"\^\ a^rfv M" ^ vAv-, ll iltnu u uf ESS (Lulling NV £4.7 7£t '\V.B. CLARKE &CAP.RUTH, j Booksellers, BOSTON , MASS. Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2014 https://archive.org/details/variationofanima02darw_0 BY THE SAME AUTHOR. ORIGIN OF SPECIES BY MEANS OF NATURAL SELECTION; or, The Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life. New and revised edition, with Additions. i2mo. Cloth, $2.00. DESCENT OF MAN, AND SELECTION IN RELATION TO SEX. With many Illustrations. A new edition. i2mo. Cloth, $3.00. JOURNAL OF RESEARCHES INTO THE NATURAL HISTO- RY AND GEOLOGY OF THE COUNTRIES VISITED DURING THE VOYAGE OF H. M. S. BEAGLE ROUND THE WORLD. A new edition. i2mo. Cloth, $2.00. EMOTIONAL EXPRESSIONS OF MAN AND THE LOWER ANIMALS. i2mo. Cloth, $3.50. THE VARIATIONS OF ANIMALS AND PLANTS UNDER DOMESTICATION. With a Preface, by Professor Asa Gray. 2 vols. Illus- trated. Cloth, $5 .00. INSECTIVOROUS PLANTS. l2mo. Cloth, $2.00. MOVEMENTS AND HABITS OF CLIMBING PLANTS. With Illustrations. i2mo. Cloth, $1.25. THE VARIOUS CONTRIVANCES BY WHICH ORCHIDS ARE FERTILIZED BY INSECTS. Revised edition, with Illustrations. i2mo. Cloth, $1.75. THE EFFECTS OF CROSS AND SELF FERTILIZATION IN THE VEGETABLE KINGDOM. i2mo. Cloth, $2.00. DIFFERENT FORMS OF FLOWERS ON PLANTS OF THE SAME SPECIES. With Illustrations. i2mo. Cloth, $1.50. THE POWER OF MOVEMENT IN PLANTS. By Charles Dar- win, LL. D., F. R. S., assisted by Francis Darwin. With Illustrations. i2mo. Cloth, $2.00. THE FORMATION OF VEGETABLE MOULD, THROUGH THE ACTION OF WORMS. With Observations on their Habits. With II- trations. i2mo. Cloth, $1.50. For sale by all booksellers ; or sent by mail, post-paid, on receipt of price. New York: D. APPLETON & CO., 1, 3, & 5, Bond Street. THE VARIATION OF ANIMALS AND PLANTS DOMESTICATION. By CHARLES DARWIN, M.A., F.R.S., &o. SECOND EDITION, REVISED. FOURTH THOUSAND. IN TWO VOLUMES.— VOL. IL WJTH ILLUSTRATIONS. NEW YOKK: D. APPLETON AND COMPANY, 1, S, and 5 BOND STREET. 1883. SCIENCE QH VZ 1223 2 \ CONTENTS. CHAPTER XIII. INHERITANCE, continued — REVERSION OR ATAVISM. DIFFERENT FORMS OF REVERSION — IN PURE OR UNCROSSED BREEDS, AS IN' PIGEONS, FOWLS, HORNLESS CATTLE AND SHEEP, IN CULTIVATED PLANTS — REVERSION IN FERAL ANIMALS AND PLANTS — REVERSION IN CROSSED VARIETIES AND SPECIES — REVERSION THROUGH BUD- PROPAGATION, AND BY SEGMENTS IN THE SAME FLOWER OR FRUIT — IN DIFFERENT PARTS OF THE BODY IN THE SAME ANIMAL — - THE ACT OF CROSSING A DIRECT CAUSE OF REVERSION, VARIOUS CASES OF, WITH INSTINCTS —OTHER PROXIMATE CAUSES OF RE- VERSION— LATENT CHARACTERS — SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTERS UNEQUAL DEVELOPMENT OF " THE TWO SIDES OF THE BODY APPEARANCE WITH ADVANCING AGE OF CHARACTERS DERIVED FROM A CROSS — THE GERM, WITH ALL ITS LATENT CHARACTERS, A WONDERFUL OBJECT — MONSTROSITIES — PELORIC FLOWERS DUE IN some cases to reversion Pages 1-36 CHAPTER XIV. inheritance, continued — FIXEDNESS OF CHARACTER — PREPOTENCY — SEXUAL LIMITATION — CORRES PON DENCE OF AGE. FIXEDNESS OF CHARACTER APPARENTLY NOT DUE TO ANTIQUITY OF INHERITANCE — PREPOTENCY OF TRANSMISSION IN INDIVIDUALS OF THE SAME FAMILY, IN CROSSED BREEDS AND SPECIES ; OFTEN STRONGER IN ONE SEX THAN THE OTHER; SOMETIMES DUE TO THE SAME CHARACTER BEING PRESENT AND VISIBLE IN ONE BREED AND LATENT IN THE OTHER — INHERITANCE AS LIMITED BY SEX — iv CONTENTS. NEWLY-ACQUIRED CHARACTERS IN OUR DOMESTICATED ANIMALS OFTEN TRANSMITTED BY ONE SEX ALONE, SOMETIMES LOST BY ONE SEX ALONE — INHERITANCE AT CORRESPONDING PERIODS OF LIFE THE IMPORTANCE OF THE PRINCIPLE WITH RESPECT TO EMBRY- OLOGY ; AS EXHIBITED IN DOMESTICATED ANIMALS ; AS EXHIBITED IN THE APPEARANCE AND DISAPPEARANCE OF INHERITED DIS- EASES ; SOMETIMES SUPERVENING EARLIER IN THE CHILD THAN IN THE PARENT — SUMMARY OF THE THREE PRECEDING CHAPTERS. Pages 37-61 CHAPTER XV. ON CROSSING. FREE INTERCROSSING OBLITERATES THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ALLIED BREEDS — WHEN THE NUMBERS OF TWO COMMINGLING BREEDS ARE UNEQUAL, ONE ABSORBS THE OTHER — THE RATE OF ABSORPTION DETERMINED BY PREPOTENCY OF TRANSMISSION, BY THE CON- DITIONS OF LIFE, AND BY NATURAL SELECTION — ALL ORGANIC BEINGS OCCASIONALLY INTERCROSS; APPARENT EXCEPTIONS — ON CERTAIN CHARACTERS INCAPABLE OF FUSION; CHIEFLY OR EX- CLUSIVELY THOSE WHICH HAVE SUDDENLY APPEARED IN THE IN- DIVIDUAL—ON THE MODIFICATION OF OLD RACES, AND THE FORMATION OF NEW RACES, BY CROSSING — SOME CROSSED RACES HAVE BRED TRUE FROM THEIR FIRST PRODUCTION — ON THE CROSS- ING OF DISTINCT SPECIES IN RELATION TO THE FORMATION OF DOMESTIC RACES 62-77 CHAPTER XVI. CAUSES WHICH INTERFERE WITH THE FREE CROSSING OF VARIETIES — INFLUENCE OF DOMESTICATION ON FER- TILITY. DIFFICULTIES IN JUDGING OF THE FERTILITY OF VARIETIES WHEN CROSSED — VARIOUS CAUSES WHICH KEEP VARIETIES DISTINCT, AS THE PERIOD OF BREEDING AND SEXUAL PREFERENCE — VARIETIES OF WHEAT SAID TO BE STERILE WHEN CROSSED — VARIETIES OF MAIZE, VERBASCUM, HOLLYHOCK, GOURDS, MELONS, AND TOBACCO CONTENTS. V RENDERED IX SOME DEGREE MUTUALLY STERILE — DOMESTICATION ELIMINATES THE TENDENCY TO STERILITY NATURAL TO SPECIES WHEN CROSSED ON THE INCREASED FERTILITY OF UNCROSSED ANIMALS AND PLANTS FROM DOMESTICATION AND CULTIVATION. Pages 78-91 CHAPTER XVII. ON THE GOOD EFFECTS OF CROSSING, AND ON THE EVIL EFFECTS OF CLOSE INTERBREEDING. DEFINITION OF CLOSE INTERBREEDING — AUGMENTATION OF MORBID TENDENCIES GENERAL EVIDENCE OF THE GOOD EFFECTS DERIVED FROM CROSSING, AND ON THE EVIL EFFECTS OF CLOSE INTERBREED- ING— CATTLE, CLOSELY INTERBRED; HALF-WILD CATTLE LONG KEPT IN THE SAME PARKS — SHEEP— FALLOW-DEER — DOGS, RABBITS, PIGS — MAN, ORIGIN OF HIS ABHORRENCE OF INCESTUOUS MARRIAGES — FOWLS PIGEONS — HIVE-BEES PLANTS, GENERAL CONSIDERA- TIONS ON THE BENEFITS DERIVED FROM CROSSING — MELONS, FRUIT- TREES, PEAS, CABBAGES, WHEAT, AND FOREST-TREES — ON THE INCREASED SIZE OF HYBRID PLANTS, NOT EXCLUSIVELY DUE TO THEIR STERILITY — OX CERTAIX PLANTS WHICH EITHER NORMALLY OR ABNORMALLY ARE SELF-IMPOTENT, BUT ARE FERTILE BOTH ON THE MALE AND FEMALE SIDE, WHEN CROSSED WITH DISTINCT INDIVIDUALS EITHER OF THE SAME OR ANOTHER SPECIES — CON- CLUSION 92-126 CHAPTER XVIII. ON THE ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF CHANGED CONDITIONS OF LIFE : STERILITY FROM VARIOUS CAUSES. ON THE GOOD DERIVED FROM SLIGHT CHANGES IN THE CONDITIONS OF LIFE —STERILITY FROM CHANGED CONDITIONS, IN ANIMALS, IN THEIR NATIVE COUNTRY AND IN MENAGERIES — MAMMALS, BIRDS, AND IXSECTS — LOSS OF SECOXDARY SEXUAL CHARACTERS AXD OF IXSTLNCTS — CAUSES OF STERILITY — STERILITY OF DOMESTICATED ANIMALS FROM CHANGED CONDITIONS — SEXUAL INCOMPATIBILITY OF INDIVIDUAL ANIMALS — STERILITY OF PLANTS FROM CHANGED vi CONTENTS. CONDITIONS OF LIFE — CONTABESCENCE OF THE ANTHERS — MON- STROSITIES AS A CAUSE OF STERILITY — DOUBLE FLOWERS— SEED- LESS FRUIT — STERILITY FROM THE EXCESSIVE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ORGANS OF VEGETATION — FROM LONG-CONTINUED PROPAGA- TION BY BUDS — INCIPIENT STERILITY THE PRIMARY CAUSE OF DOUBLE FLOWERS AND SEEDLESS FRUIT .. .. Pages 127-156 CHAPTER XIX. SUMMARY OF THE FOUR LAST CHAPTERS, "WITH REMARKS ON HYBRIDISM. ON THE EFFECTS OF CROSSING THE INFLUENCE. OF DOMESTICATION ON FERTILITY — CLOSE INTERBREEDING — GOOD AND EVIL RESULTS FROM CHANGED CONDITIONS OF LIFE — VARIETIES WHEN CROSSED NOT INVARIABLY FERTILE ON THE DIFFERENCE IN FERTILITY BE- TWEEN CROSSED SPECIES AND VARIETIES — CONCLUSIONS WITH RE- SPECT TO HYBRIDISM LIGHT THROWN ON HYBRIDISM BY THE ILLEGITIMATE PROGENY OF HETEROSTYLED PLANTS STERILITY OF CROSSED SPECIES DUE TO DIFFERENCES CONFINED TO THE REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEM — NOT ACCUMULATED THROUGH NATURAL SELECTION — REASONS WHY DOMESTIC VARIETIES ARE NOT MUTUALLY STERILE — TOO MUCH STRESS HAS BEEN LAID ON THE DIFFERENCE IN FERTILITY BETWEEN CROSSED SPECIES AND CROSSED VARIETIES — CONCLUSION 157-175 CHAPTER XX. SELECTION BY MAN. SELECTION A DIFFICULT ART — METHODICAL, UNCONSCIOUS, AND NATURAL SELECTION — RESULTS OF METHODICAL SELECTION — CARE TAKEN IN SELECTION — SELECTION WITH PLANTS — SELECTION CARRIED ON BY THE ANCIENTS AND BY SEMI-CIVILISED PEOPLE UNIMPORTANT CHARACTERS OFTEN ATTENDED TO — UNCONSCIOUS SELECTION AS CIRCUMSTANCES SLOWLY CHANGE, SO HAVE OUR DOMESTICATED ANIMALS CHANGED THROUGH THE ACTION OF UNCONSCIOUS SELEC- TION— INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT BREEDERS ON THE SAME SUB- CONTENTS. vii VARIETY — PLANTS AS AFFECTED BY UNCONSCIOUS SELECTION — EFFECTS OF SELECTION AS SHOWN BY THE GREAT AMOUNT OF DIFFERENCE IN THE PARTS MOST VALUED BY MAN .. Pages 176-208 CHAPTER XXI. selection, continued. NATURAL SELECTION AS AFFECTING DOMESTIC PRODUCTIONS — CHARAC- TERS WHICH APPEAR OF TRIFLING VALUE OFTEN OF REAL IM- PORTANCE— CIRCUMSTANCES FAVOURABLE TO SELECTION BY MAN — FACILITY IN PREVENTING CROSSES, AND THE NATURE OF THE CONDITIONS CLOSE ATTENTION AND PERSEVERANCE INDISPENSABLE — THE PRODUCTION OF A LARGE NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS ESPE- CIALLY FAVOURABLE — WHEN NO SELECTION IS APPLIED, DISTINCT RACES ARE NOT FORMED — HIGHLY-BRED ANIMALS LIABLE TO DE- GENERATION— TENDENCY IN MAN TO CARRY THE SELECTION OF EACH CHARACTER TO AN EXTREME POINT, LEADING TO DIVERGENCE OF CHARACTER, RARELY TO CONVERGENCE — CHARACTERS CON- TINUING TO VARY IN THE SAME DIRECTION IN WHICH THEY HAVE ALREADY VARIED— DIVERGENCE OF CHARACTER WITH THE EX- TINCTION OF INTERMEDIATE VARIETIES, LEADS TO DISTINCTNESS IN OUR DOMESTIC RACES— LIMIT TO THE POWER OF SELECTION — LAPSE OF TIME IMPORTANT — MANNER IN WHICH DOMESTIC RACES HAVE ORIGINATED — SUMMARY 209-236 CHAPTER XXII. CAUSES OF VARIABILITY. VARIABILITY DOES NOT NECESSARILY ACCOMPANY REPRODUCTION — CAUSES ASSIGNED BY VARIOUS AUTHORS — INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES — VARIABILITY OF EVERY KIND DUE TO CHANGED CONDITIONS OF LIFE— ON THE NATURE OF SUCH CHANGES — CLIMATE, FOOD, EX- CESS OF NUTRIMENT — SLIGHT CHANGES SUFFICIENT — EFFECTS OF GRAFTING ON THE VARIABILITY OF SEEDLING-TREES — DOMESTIC PRO- DUCTIONS BECOME HABITUATED TO CHANGED CONDITIONS — ON THE ACCUMULATIVE ACTION OF CHANGED CONDITIONS — CLOSE INTER- BREEDING AND THE IMAGINATION OF THE MOTHER SUPPOSED TO CONTENTS. CAUSE VARIABILITY — CROSSING AS A CAUSE OF THE APPEARANCE OF NEW CHARACTERS— VARIABILITY FROM THE COMMINGLING OF CHARACTERS AND FROM REVERSION — ON THE MANNER AND PERIOD OF ACTION OF THE CAUSES WHICH EITHER DIRECTLY, OR IN- DIRECTLY THROUGH THE REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEM, INDUCE VARIA- BILITY Pages 237-259 CHAPTER XXIII. DIRECT AND DEFINITE ACTION OF THE EXTERNAL CON- DITIONS OF LIFE. SLIGHT MODIFICATIONS IN PLANTS FROM THE DEFINITE ACTION OF CHANGED CONDITIONS, IN SLZE, COLOUR, CHEMICAL PROPERTIES, AND IN THE STATE OF THE TISSUES — LOCAL DISEASES — CON- SPICUOUS MODIFICATIONS FROM CHANGED CLIMATE OR FOOD, ETC. — PLUMAGE OF BIRDS AFFECTED BY PECULIAR NUTRIMENT, AND BY THE INOCULATION OF POISON — LAND-SHELLS — MODIFICATIONS OF ORGANIC BEINGS IN A STATE OF NATURE THROUGH THE DEFINITE ACTION OF EXTERNAL CONDITIONS — COMPARISON OF AMERICAN AND EUROPEAN TREES — GALLS — EFFECTS OF PARASITIC FUNGI — CONSIDERATIONS OPPOSED TO THE BELIEF IN THE POTENT IN- FLUENCE OF CHANGED EXTERNAL CONDITIONS — PARALLEL SERIES OF VARIETIES — AMOUNT OF VARIATION DOES NOT CORRESPOND WITH THE DEGREE OF CHANGE IN THE CONDITIONS — BUD-VARIA- TION— MONSTROSITIES PRODUCED BY UNNATURAL TREATMENT SUMMARY 260-282 CHAPTER XXIV. LAWS OF VARIATION — USE AND DISUSE, ETC. NISUS FORMATIVUS, OR THE CO-ORDINATING POWER OF THE ORGANISA- TION— ON THE EFFECTS OF THE INCREASED USE AND DISUSE OF ORGANS — CHANGED HABITS OF LIFE — ACCLIMATISATION WITH ANIMALS AND PLANTS — VARIOUS METHODS BY WHICH THIS CAN BE EFFECTED — ARRESTS OF DEVELOPMENT — RUDIMENTARY ORGANS. 283-310 CONTENTS. CHAPTEE XXV. ' LAWS OF VARIATION, continued — CORRELATED VARIA- BILITY. EXPLANATION OF TERM CORRELATION — CONNECTED WITH DEVELOP- MENT MODIFICATIONS CORRELATED WITH THE INCREASED OR DECREASED SIZE OF PARTS — CORRELATED VARIATION OF HOMO- LOGOUS PARTS — FEATHERED FEET IN BIRDS ASSUMING THE STRUC- TURE OF THE WINGS CORRELATION BETWEEN THE HEAD AND THE EXTREMITIES — BETWEEN THE SKIN AND DERMAL APPENDAGES BETWEEN THE ORGANS OF SIGHT AND HEARING — CORRELATED MODIFICATIONS IN THE ORGANS OF PLANTS — CORRELATED MON- STROSITIES— CORRELATION BETWEEN THE SKULL AND EARS — SKULL AND CREST OF FEATHERS SKULL AND HORNS — CORRELATION OF GROWTH COMPLICATED BY THE ACCUMULATED EFFECTS OF NATURAL SELECTION — COLOUR AS CORRELATED WITH CONSTITUTIONAL PECU- LIARITIES Pages 31 1-332 CHAPTEE XXVI. laws of variation, continued — summary. THE FUSION OF HOMOLOGOUS PARTS — THE VARIABILITY OF MULTIPLE AND HOMOLOGOUS PARTS — COMPENSATION OF GROWTH — MECHANICAL PRESSURE— RELATIVE POSITION OF FLOWERS WITH RESPECT TO THE AXIS, AND OF SEEDS IN THE OVARY, AS INDUCING VARIA- TION— ANALOGOUS OR PARALLEL VARIETIES — SUMMARY OF THE THREE LAST CHAPTERS 333-348 CHAPTEE XXVII. provisional hypothesis of pangenesis. PRELIMINARY REMARKS FIRST PART : — THE FACTS TO BE CONNECTED UNDER A SINGLE POINT OF VIEW, NAMELY, THE VARIOUS KINDS OF REPRODUCTION — RE-GROWTH OF AMPUTATED PARTS — GRAFT- HYBRIDS — THE DIRECT ACTION OF THE MALE ELEMENT ON THE X CONTENTS. FEMALE— DEVELOPMENT — THE FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE OF THE UNITS OF THE BODY — VARIABILITY — INHERITANCE — REVERSION. SECOND PART : — STATEMENT OF THE HYPOTHESIS HOW FAR THE NECESSARY ASSUMPTIONS ARE IMPROBABLE — EXPLANATION BY AID OF THE HYPOTHESIS OF THE SEVERAL CLASSES OF FACTS SPECI- FIED in the first part — conclusion .. .. Pages 349-399 CHAPTEE XXVIII. CONCLUDING REMARKS. DOMESTICATION — NATURE AND CAUSES OF VARIABILITY — SELECTION — DIVERGENCE AND DISTINCTNESS OF CHARACTER — EXTINCTION OF RACES — CIRCUMSTANCES FAVOURABLE TO SELECTION BY MAN — ANTIQUITY OF CERTAIN RACES — THE QUESTION WHETHER EACH PARTICULAR VARIATION HAS BEEN SPECIALLY PREORDAINED. 400-428 INDEX 429 T11E VARIATION OF ANIMALS AND PLANTS UNDER DOMESTICATION. CHAPTER XIII. INHERITANCE continued — REVERSION OR ATAVISM. DIFFERENT FORMS OF REVERSION — IN PTJEE OR UNCROSSED BREEDS, AS IN PIGEONS, FOWLS, HORNLESS CATTLE AND SHEEP, IN CULTIVATED PLANTS REVERSION IN FERAL ANIMALS AND PLANTS — REVERSION' IN CROSSED VARIETIES AND SPECIES — REVERSION THROUGH BUD-PROPAGATION, AND BY SEGMENTS LN THE SAME FLOWER OR FRUIT —IN DIFFERENT PARTS OF THE BODY IN THE SAME ANIMAL — THE ACT Or CROSSING A DIRECT CAUSE OF REVERSION, VARIOUS CASES OF, WITH INSTINCTS — OTHER PROXIMATE CAUSES OF REVERSION LATENT . CHARACTERS — SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTERS — UNEQUAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE TWO SIDES OF THE BODY — APPEARANCE WITH ADVANCING AGE OF CHARACTERS DERIVED FROM A CROSS — THE GERM, WITH ALL ITS LATENT CHARACTERS, A WONDERFUL OBJECT — MONSTROSITIES — PELORIC FLOWERS DUE IN SOME CASES TO REVERSION. The great principle of inheritance to be discussed in this chapter has been recognised by agriculturists and authors of various nations, as shown by the scientific term Atavism, de- rived from atavus, an ancestor; by the English terms of Reversion, or Throiving-back ; by the French Pas en-Arriere ; and by the German Ruckschlag, or MucTcschritt. When the child resembles either grandparent more closely than its immediate parents, our attention is not much arrested, though in truth the fact is highly remarkable ; but when the child resembles some remote ancestor or some distant member in a collateral line, — and in the last case we must attribute this to the descent of all the members from a common progenitor, — we feel a just degree of astonishment. When one parent alone displays some newly-acquired and generally inheritable 2 INHERITANCE. Chap. XIII. character, and the offspring do not inherit it, the cause may lie in the other parent having the power of prepotent trans- mission. But when both parents are similarly characterised, and the child does not, whatever the cause may be, inherit the character in question, but resembles its grandparents, we have one of the simplest cases of reversion. We continually see another and even more simple case of atavism, though not generally included under this head, namely, when the son more closely resembles his maternal than his paternal grand- sire in some male attribute, as in any peculiarity in the beard of man, the horns of the bull, the hackles or comb of the cock, or, as in certain diseases necessarily confined to the male sex ; for as the mother cannot possess or exhibit such male attri- butes, the child must inherit them, through her blood, from his maternal grandsire. The cases of reversion m&y be divided into two main classes which, however, in some instances, blend into one another ; namely, first, those occurring in a variety or race which has not been crossed, but has lost by variation some character that it formerly possessed, and which afterwards reappears. The second class includes all cases in which an individual with some distinguishable character, a race, or species, has at some former period been crossed, and a character derived from this cross, after having disappeared during one or several generations, suddenly reappears. A third class, differing only in the manner of reproduction, might be formed to include all cases of reversion effected by means of buds, and therefore independent of true or seminal generation. Perhaps even a fourth class might be instituted, to include reversions by seg- ments in the same individual flower or fruit, and in different parts of the body in the same individual animal as it grows old. But the two first main classes will be sufficient for our purpose. Reversion to lost Characters by pure or uncrossed forms. — Striking instances of this first class of cases were given in the sixth chapter, namely, of the occasional reappearance, in variously-coloured breeds of the pigeon, of blue birds with all the marks characteristic of the wild Columba livia. Similar Chap. XIII. REVERSION. 3 cases were given in the case of the fowl. With the common ass, as the legs of the wild progenitor are almost always striped, we may feel assured that the occasional appearance of such stripes in the domestic animal is a case of simple reversion. But I shall be compelled to refer again to these cases, and therefore here pass them over. The aboriginal species from which our domesticated cattle and sheep are descended, no doubt possessed horns ; but several hornless breeds are now well established. Yet in these — for instance, in Southdown sheep — " it is not unusual to find among the male lambs some with small horns." The horns, which thus occasionally reappear in other polled breeds, either " grow to the full size," or are curiously attached to the skin alone and hang " loosely down, or drop oflf." 1 The Galloways and Suffolk cattle have been hornless for the last 100 or 150 years, but a horned calf, with the horn often loosely attached, is occasionally produced.2 There is reason to believe that sheep in their early domesti- cated condition were " brown or dingy black ; " but even in the time of David certain flocks were spoken of as white as snow. During the classical period the sheep of Spain are described by several ancient authors as being black, red, or tawny.3 At the present day, notwithstanding the great care which is taken to prevent it, particoloured lambs and some entirely black are occasionally, or even frequently, dropped by our most highly improved and valued breeds, such as the Southdowns. Since the time of the famous Bakewell, during the last century, the Leicester sheep have been bred with the most scrupulous care ; yet occasionally grey-faced, or black- spotted, or wholly black lambs appear.4 This occurs still more frequently with the less improved breeds, such as the Norfolks.5 As bearing on this tendency in sheep to revert to dark colours, I may state (though in doing so I trench on 1 Youatt on Sheep, pp. 20, 234. 145. The same fact of loose horns oc- 4 I have been informed of this fact casionally appearing in hornless breeds through the Rev. W. D. Fox, on the has been observed in Germany ; excellent authority of Mr. Wilmot : Bechstein, 1 Naturgesch. Deutsch- see, also, remarks on this subject in lands.' b. i. s. 362. an article in the ' Quarterly Review,' 2 Youatt on Cattle, pp. 155, 174. 1849, p. 395. 3 Youatt on Sheep, 1838, pp. 17, 5 Youatt, pp. 19, 234. 4 INHERITANCE. Chap. XIII. the reversion of crossed breeds, and likewise on the subject of prepotency) that the Rev. W. D. Fox was informed that seven white Southdown ewes were put to a so-called Spanish ram, which had two small black spots on his sides, and they pro- duced thirteen lambs, all perfectly black. Mr. Fox believes that this ram belonged to a breed which he has himself kept, and which is always spotted with black and white ; and he finds that Leicester sheep crossed by rams of this breed always produce black lambs : he has gone on recrossing these crossed sheep with pure white Leicesters during three successive generations, but always with the same result. Mr. Fox was also told by the friend from whom the spotted breed was procured, that he likewise had gone on for six or seven gene- rations crossing with white sheep, but still black lambs were invariably produced. Similar facts could be given with respect to tailless breeeds of various animals. For instance, Mr. Hewitt 6 states that chickens bred from some rumpless fowls, which were reckoned so good that they won a prize at an exhibition, " in a consider- able number of instances were furnished with fully developed tail-feathers." On inquiry, the original breeder of these fowls stated that, from the time when he had first kept them, they had often produced fowls furnished with tails ; but that these latter would again reproduce rumpless chickens. Analogous cases of reversion occur in the vegetable king- dom ; thus " from seeds gathered from the finest cultivated varieties of Heartsease (Viola tricolor), plants perfectly wild both in their foliage and their flowers are frequently pro- duced ;" 7 but the reversion in this instance is not to a very ancient period, for the best existing varieties of the heartsease are of comparatively modern origin. With most of our cul- tivated vegetables there is some tendency to reversion to what is known to be, or may be presumed to be, their abori- ginal state ; and this would be more evident if gardeners did not generally look over their beds of seedlings, and pull up 6 'The Poultry Book,' by Mr. Tegetmeier, 1866, p. 231. 7 Loudon's ' Gard. Mag.,' vol. x., 1834, p. 396 : a nurseryman, with much experience on this subject, has likewise assured me that this some- times occurs. Chap. XIII. REVERSION. 5 the false plants or " rogues " as they are called. It has already been remarked, that some few seedling apples and pears generally resemble, bnt apparently are not identical with, the wild trees from which they are descended. In our turnip 8 and carrot-beds a few plants often " break " — that is, flower too soon ; and their roots are generally hard and stringy, as in the parent-species. By the aid of a little selection, carried on during a few generations, most of our cultivated plants could probably be brought back, without any great change in their conditions of life, to a wild or nearly wild condition : Mr. Buckman has effected this with the parsnip ; 9 and Mr. Hewett C. Watson, as he informs me, selected, during three generations, " the most diverging plants of Scotch kail, perhaps one of the least modified varieties of the cabbage ; and in the third generation some of the plants came very close to the forms now established in England about old castle-walls, and called indigenous/' Reversion in Animals and Plants which have run wild. — In the cases hitherto considered, the reverting animals and plants have not been exposed to any great or abrupt change in their conditions of life which could have induced this tendency ; but it is very different with animals and plants which have become feral or run wild. It has been repeatedly asserted in the most positive manner by various authors, that feral animals and plants invariably return to their primitive specific type. It is curious on what little evidence this belief rests. Many of our domesticated animals could not subsist in a wild state ; thus, the more highly improved breeds of the pigeon will not "field" or search for their own food. Sheep have never become feral, and would be destroyed by almost every beast of prey.10 In several cases we do not know the aboriginal parent-species, and cannot possibly tell 8 'Gardener's Chron.,' 1855, p. 777. 9 Ibid., 1862, p. 721. 10 Mr. Boner speaks (' Chamois- hunting,' 2nd edit., 1860, p. 92) of sheep often running wild in the Bavarian Alps ; but, on making further inquiries at my request, he found that they are not able to es- tablish themselves; they generally perish from the frozen snow clinging to their wool, and they have lost the skill necessary to pass over steep icy slopes. On one occasion two ewes survived the winter, but their lambs perished. G INHERITANCE. Chap. XIII. whether or not there has been any close degree of reversion. It is not known in any instance what variety was first turned out ; several varieties have probably in some cases run wild, and their crossing alone would tend to obliterate their proper character. Our domesticated animals and plants, when they run wild, must always be exposed to new conditions of life, for, as Mr. Wallace 11 has well remarked, they have to obtain their own food, and are exposed to competition with the native productions. Under these circumstances, if our domesticated animals did not undergo change of some kind, the result would be quite opposed to the conclusions arrived at in this work. Nevertheless, I do not doubt that the simple fact of animals and plants becoming feral, does cause some tendency to reversion to the primitive state ; though this tendency has been much exaggerated by some authors. I will briefly run through the recorded cases. With neither horses nor cattle is the primitive stock known ; and it has been shown in former chapters that they have assumed different colours in different countries. Thus the horses which have run wild in South America are generally brownish-bay, and in the East dun- coloured ; their heads have become larger and coarser, and this may be due to reversion. No careful description has been given of the feral goat. Dogs which have run wild in various countries have hardly anywhere assumed a uniform character ; but they are probably descended from several domestic races, and aboriginally from several distinct species. Feral cats, both in Europe and La Plata, are regularly striped ; in some cases they have grown to an unusually large size, but do not differ from the domestic animal in any other character. When variously-coloured tame rabbits are turned out in Europe, they generally reacquire the colouring of the wild animal ; there can be no doubt that this does really occur, but we should remember that oddly-coloured and conspicuous animals would suffer much from beasts of prey and from being easily shot ; this at least was the opinion of a gentleman who tried to stock his woods with a nearly white variety ; if thus destroyed, they would be supplanted by, instead of being transformed into, the common rabbit. We have seen that the feral rabbits of Jamaica, and especially of Porto Santo, have assumed new colours and other new characters. The best known case of reversion, and that on which the widely spread belief in its universality apparently rests, is that of pigs. These animals have run wild in the West Indies, South America, and the Falkland Islands, and have everywhere 11 See some excellent remarks on Proc. Linn. Soc.,' 1858, vol. iii. p. 60. this subject by Mr. Wallace, ' Journal Chap. XIII. REVERSION. 7 Required the dark colour, the thick bristles, and great tusks of the wild boar; and the young have reacquired longitudinal stripes. But even in the case of the pig, Eoulin describes the half-wild animals in different parts of South America as differing in several respects. In Louisiana the pig 12 has run wild, and is said to differ a little in form, and much in colour, from the domestic animal, yet does not closely resemble the wild boar of Europe. With pigeons and fowls,13 it is not known what variety was first turned out, nor wrhat character the feral birds have assumed. The guinea-fowl in the West Indies, when feral, seems to vary more than in the domesticated state. With respect to plants run wild, Dr. Hooker14 has strongly insisted on what slight evidence the common belief in their reversion to a primitive state rests. Godron15 describes wild turnips, carrots, and celery; but these plants in their cultivated state hardly differ from their wild prototypes, except in the succu- lency and enlargement of certain parts, — characters which would certainly be lost by plants growing in poor soil and struggling with other plants. No cultivated plant has run wild on so enormous a scale as the cardoon (Cynara cardunculus) in La Plata. Every botanist who has seen it growing there, in vast beds, as high as a horse's back, has been struck with its peculiar appearance ; but whether it differs in any important point from the cultivated Spanish form, which is said not to be prickly like its American descendant, or whether it differs from the wild Mediterranean species, which is said not to be social (though this may be due merely to the nature of the conditions), I do not know. Reversion to Characters derived from a Cross, in the case of Sub-varieties, Races, and Species. — When an individual having some recognisable peculiarity unites with another of the same sub-variety, not having the peculiarity in question, it often reappears in the descendants after an interval of several gene- rations. Every one niu>t have noticed, or heard from old people of children closely resembling in appearance or mental disposition, or in so small and complex a character as expres- 12 Dureau de la Malle, in ' Comptes Rendus,' torn, xli., 1855, p. 807. From the statements above given, the author concludes that the wild pigs of Louisiana are not descended from the European Sus scrofa. 13 Capt. W. Allen, in his ' Expe- dit:on to the Niger,' states that fowls have run wild on the island of Anno- bon, and have become modified in form and voice. The account is so meagre and vague that it did not appear to me worth copying: but I now find that Dureau de la Malle {' Comp- tes Rendus,' torn, xli., 1855, p. 690) advances this as a good instance of reversion to the primitive stock, and as confirmatory of a still more vague statement in classical times bv Varro. 14 'Flora of Australia,' 1859, In- troduce, p. ix. 15 ' De l'Espece,' torn. ii. pp. 54, 58, 60. 8 INHERITANCE. Chai\ XIII. sion, one of their grandparents, or some more distant collateral relation. Very many anomalies of structure and diseases,16 of which instances have been given in the last chapter, have come into a family from one parent, and have reappeared in the progeny after passing over two or three generations. The following case has been communicated to me on good authority, and may, I believe, be fully trusted : a pointer-bitch produced seven puppies ; four were marked with blue and white, which is so unusual a colour with pointers that she was thought to have played false with one of the greyhounds, and the whole litter was condemned ; but the gamekeeper was per- mitted to save one as a curiosity. Two years afterwards a friend of the owner saw the young dog, and declared that he was the image of his old pointer-bitch Sappho, the only blue and white pointer of pure descent which he had ever seen. This led to close inquiry, and it was proved that he was the great-great-grandson of Sappho ; so that, according to the common expression, he had only 1-1 6th of her blood in his veins. I may give one other instance, on the authority of Mr. E. Walker, a large cattle-breeder in Kincardineshire. He bought a black bull, the son of a black cow with white legs, white belly and part of the tail white; and in 1870 a calf the gr.-gr.-gr.-gr.-grandchild of this cow was born coloured in the same very peculiar manner ; all the inter- mediate offspring having been black. In these cases there can hardly be a doubt that a character derived from a cross with an individual of the same variety reappeared after passing over three generations in the one case, and five in the other. When two distinct races are crossed, it is notorious that the tendency in the offspring to revert to one or both parent- forms is strong, and endures for many generations. I have myself seen the clearest evidence of this in crossed pigeons and with various plants. Mr. Sidney 17 states that, in a litter of Essex pigs, two young ones appeared which were the image of the Berkshire boar that had been used twenty-eight years 16 Mr. Sedgwick gives many in- July, 1863, pp. 448, 188. stances in the ' British and Foreign 17 In his edit, of ' Youatt on the " Med.-Chirurg. Review,' April and Pig,' 1860, p. 27. Chap. XIII. REVERSION. 9 before in giving size and constitution to the breed. I ob- served in the farmyard at Betley Hall some fowls showing a strong likeness to the Malay breed, and was told by Mr. Toilet that he had forty years before crossed his birds with Malays ; and that, though he had at first attempted to get rid of this strain, he had subsequently given up the attempt in despair, as the Malay character would reappear. This strong tendency in crossed breeds to revert has given rise to endless discussions in how many generations after a single cross, either with a distinct breed or merely with an inferior animal, the breed may be considered as pure, and free from all danger of reversion. No one. supposes that less than three generations suffices, and most breeders think that six, seven, or eight are necessary, and some go to still greater lengths.18 But neither in the case of a breed which has been contaminated by a single cross, nor when, in the attempt to form an intermediate breed, half-bred animals have been matched together during many generations, can any rule be laid down how soon the tendency to reversion will be oblitera- ted. It depends on the difference in the strength or pre- potency of transmission in the two parent-forms, on their actual amount of difference, and on the nature of the con- ditions of life to which the crossed offspring are exposed. But we must be careful not to confound these cases of reversion to characters which were gained by a cross, with those under the first class, in which characters originally common to both parents, but lost at some former period, reappear ; for such characters may recur after an almost indefinite number of generations. The law of reversion is as powerful with hybrids, when they are sufficiently fertile to breed together, or when they are repeatedly crossed with either pure parent-form, as in the case of mongrels. It is not necessary to give instances. With plants almost every one who has worked on this sub- ject, from the time of Kolreuter to the present day, has insisted on this tendency. Gartner has recorded some good instances ; but no one has given more striking ones than 18 Dr. P. Lucas, ' Hered. Nat.,' « Gard. Chronicle,' 1856, p. 620. I torn. ii. pp. 314, 892 : see a good could add a vast number of references, practical article on the subject in but they would be superfluous. 10 INHERITANCE. Chap. XII I. Xaudin.19 The tendency differs in degree or strength in different groups, and partly depends, as we shall presently see, on whether the parent-plants have been long cultivated. Although the tendency to reversion is extremely general ■with nearly all mongrels and hybrids, it cannot be considered as invariably characteristic of them ; it may also be mastered by long-continued selection ; but these subjects will more properly be discussed in a future chapter on Crossing. From what we see of the power and scope of reversion, both in pure races, and when varieties or species are crossed, we may infer that characters of almost every kind are capable of reappear- ing after having been lost for a great length of time. But it does not follow from this that in each particular case certain characters will reappear; for instance, this will not occur when a race is crossed with another endowed with prepotency of transmission. Sometimes the power of reversion wholly fails, without our being able to assign any cause for thn failure : thus it has been stated that in a French family in which 85 out of above 600 members, during six generations, had been subject to night-blindness, " there has not been a single example of this affection in the children of parents who were themselves free from it."20 Reversion through Bud-propagation — Partial Reversion, by seg- ments in the same flower or fruit, or in different parts of the body in the same individual animal. — In the eleventh chapter many cases of reversion by buds, independently of seminal genera- tion, were given — as when a leaf-bud on a variegated, a curled, or laciniated variety suddenly reassumes its proper character; or as when' a Provence-rose appears on a moss-rose, or a peach on a nectarine-tree. In some of these cases only half the flower or fruit, or a smaller segment, or mere stripes, reassume their former character ; and here we have reversion 19 Kolreuter gives curious cases in his 4 Dritte Fortsetzung.' 1766. ss. 53, 59; and in his well-known 'Memoirs on Lavatera and Jalapa.' Gartner, 4 Bastarderzeugung.' ss. 437, 441, &c. Naudin, in his " Rechercbes sur 1'Hybridite," ' Nouvelles Archives du Museum,' torn. i. p. 25. *• Quoted by Mr. Sedgwick in 4 Med.-Chirurg. Review.' April, 1861, p. 485. Dr. H. Dobell, in 4 Med.- Chirurg. Transactions,' vcL xlvi., gives an analogous ca-e. in which, in a large family, fingers with thickened joints were transmitted to several members during five generations ; but when the blemish once disappeared it never reappeared. Chap. XHL EE VERSION. 11 bv segments. Yilmorin21 has also recorded several cases with plants derived from seed, of flowers reverting by stripes or blotches to their primitive colours : he states that in all such cases a white or pale-coloured variety must first be formed, and, when this is propagated for a length of time by seed, striped seedlings occasionally make their appearance ; and these can afterwards by care be multiplied by seed. The stripes and segments just referred to are not due, as far . as is known, to reversion to characters derived from a cross, but to characters lost by variation. These cases^ however, as Xaudin22 insists in his discussion on disjunction of character, are closely analogous with those given in the eleventh chapter, in which crossed plants have been known to produce half- and-half or striped flowers and fruit, or distinct kinds of flowers on the same root resembling the two parent-forms. Many piebald animals probably come under this same head. Such cases, as we shall see in the chapter on Crossing, appa- rently result from certain characters not readily blending together, and, as a consequence of this incapacity for fusion, the offspring either perfectly resemble one of their two parents, or resemble one parent in one part, and the other parent in another part ; or whilst young are intermediate in character, but with advancing age revert wholly or by seg- ments to either parent-form, or to both. Thus, young trees of the Cytisus adami are intermediate in foliage and flowers between the two parent-fornis ; but when older the buds continually revert either partially or wholly to both forms. The cases given in the eleventh chapter on the changes which occurred during growth in crossed plants of Tropaeolum, Cereus, Datura, and Lathyrus are all analogous. As, however, these plants are hybrids of the first generation, and as their buds after a time come to resemble their parents and not their grandparents, these cases do not at first appear to come under the law of reversion in the ordinary sense of the word ; never- theless, as the change is effected through a succession of bud- generations on the same plant, they may be thus included. Analogous facts have been observed in the animal kingdom, 21 Yerlot, ' Des Varietes,' 1865, torn. i. p. 25. Alex. Braun (in his 1 Re- p. 63. juvenescence,' Ray Soc. 1853, p. 315) 22 'Xouvelles Archives du Museum,' apparently holds a similar opinion. 12 INHERITANCE. Chap. XITL and are more remarkable, as they occur in the same individual in the strictest sense, and not as with plants through a suc- cession of bud-generations. With animals the act of rever- sion, if it can be so designated, does not pass over a true generation, but merely over the early stages of growth in the same individual. For instance, I crossed several white hens with a black cock, and many of the chickens were, during the first year, perfectly white, but acquired during the second year black feathers: on the other hand, some of the chickens which were at first black, became during the second year piebald with white. A great breeder 23 says, that a Pencilled Brahma hen which has any of the blood of the Light Brahma in her, will "occasionally produce a pullet well pencilled during the first year, but she will most likely moult brown on the shoulders and become quite unlike her original colours in the second year." The same thing occurs with light Brahmas if of impure blood. I have observed exactly similar cases with the crossed offspring from differently coloured pigeons. But here is a more remarkable fact : I crossed a turbit, which has a frill formed by the feathers being reversed on its breast, with a trumpeter : and one of the young pigeons thus raised at first showed not a trace of the frill, but. after moulting thrice, a small yet unmistakably distinct frill appeared on its breast. According to Girou,24 calves produced from a red cow by a black bull, or from a black cow by a red bull, are not rarely born red, and subsequently become black. I possess a dog. the daughter of a white terrier by a fox- coloured bulldog ; as a puppy she was quite white, but when about six months old a black spot appeared on her nose, and brown spots on her ears. \N hen a little older she was badly wounded on the back, and the hair which grew on the cicatrix was of a brown colour, apparently derived from her father. This is the more remarkable, as with most animals having coloured hair, that which grows on a wounded surface is white. In the foregoing cases, the characters which with advancing age reappeared, were present in the immediately preceding -3 Mr. Teebav, in ' The Poultry 24 Quoted by Hofacker, 1 Ueber die Book.' by Mr. tegetmeier, 1866, p. Eigenschaften.' , 167. " April, p. 277. 20 INHERITANCE. Chap. XHE. who raised a large number of hybrids from a bantam-ben by GaUus sonneraiii, states that "all were exceedingly wild." Mr. Waterton44 bred some wild ducks from eggs hatched under a common duck, and the young were allowed to cross freely both amongst themselves and with the tame ducks ; they were u half wild and half tame ; they came to the windows to be fed, but still they had a wariness about them quite remarkable." On the other hand, mules from the horse and ass are certainly not in the least wild, though notorious for obstinacy and vice. Mr. Brent, who has crossed canary-birds with many kinds of finches, has not observed, as he informs me, that the hybrids were in any way remarkably wild : but Mr. Jenner Weir who has had still greater experience, is of a directly opposite opinion. He remarks that the siskin is the tamest of finches, but its mules are as wild, when young, as newly caught birds, and are often lost through their continued efforts to escape. Hybrids are often raised between the common and musk duck, and I have been assured by three persons, who have kept these crossed birds, that they were not wild ; but Mr. Garnett45 observed that his hybrids were wild, and exhibited u migratory propensities ,; of which there is not a vestige in the common or musk duck. No case is known of this latter bird having escaped and become wild in Europe or Asia, except, according to Pallas, on the Caspian Sea ; and the common domestic duck only occasionally becomes wild in districts where large lakes and fens abound. Never- theless, a large number of cases have been recorded46 of hybrids from these two ducks having been shot in a com- pletely wild state, although so few are reared in comparison with purely-bred birds of either species. It is improbable that any of these hybrids could have acquired their wildness 44 'Essays on Natural History,' p. asserts ('Zoologist.' vol. v.. 1845-46, 917. p. 1254) that several hare been shot 45 As stated by Mr. Orton, in his in various parts of Belgium and 1 Physiology of Breeding.' p. 12. Northern France. Audubon (' Ornith- 46 M. E. de Selys-Longchamps olog. Biography,' vol. iii. p. 168), refers (' Bulletin Acad. Roy. de Brux- speaking of these hybrids, says that, elles,' torn. iii. No. 10) to more than in North America, they " now and seven of these hybrids shot in then wander otF and become quite Switzerland and France. M Dehr wild." Chap. XIII. REVERSION. 21 from the musk-duck having paired with a truly wild duck ; and this is known not to be the case in Xorth America ; hence we must infer that they have reacquired, through reversion, their wildness, as well as renewed powers of flight. These latter facts remind us of the statements, so frequently made by travellers in all parts of the world, on the degraded state and savage disposition of crossed races of man. That many excellent and kind-hearted mulattos have existed no one will dispute ; and a more mild and gentle set of men could hardly be found than the inhabitants of the island of Chilce, who consist of Indians commingled with Spaniards in various proportions. On the other hand, many years ago, long before I had thought of the present subject, I was struck with the fact that, in South America, men of complicated descent between Xegroes, Indians, and Spaniards, seldom had, what- ever the cause might be, a good expression.47 Livingstone, — and a more unimpeachable authority cannot be quoted, — after speaking of a half-caste man on the Zambesi, described by the Portuguese as a rare monster of inhumanity, remarks, " It is unaccountable why half-castes, such as he, are so much more cruel than the Portuguese, but such is undoubtedly the case." An inhabitant remarked to Livingstone, " God made white men, and God made black men, but the Devil made half- castes."48 When two races, both low in the scale, are crossed the progeny seems to be eminently bad. Thus the noble- hearted Humboldt, who felt no prejudice against the inferior races, speaks in strong terms of the bad and savage disposition of Zambos, or half-castes between Indians and Xegroes ; and this conclusion has been arrived at by various observers.49 From these facts we may perhaps infer that the degraded state of so many half-castes is in part due to reversion to a primitive and savage condition, induced by the act of crossing, even if mainly due to the unfavourable moral conditions under which they are generally reared. Summary on the proximate causes leading to Reversion. — When 47 'Journal of Researches,' 1845, 49 Dr. P. Broca, on ' Hybridity in p. 71. the Genus Homo,' Eng. translat., 48 'Expedition to the Zambesi,' 1864, p. 39. 1865, pp. 25, 150. 22 INHERITANCE. Chap. XIII. purely-bred animals or plants reassume long-lost characters, — when the common ass, for instance, is born with striped legs, when a pure race of black or white pigeons throws a slaty- blue bird, or when a cultivated heartsease with large and rounded flowers produces a seedling with small and elongated flowers, — we are quite unable to assign any proximate cause. When animals run wild, the tendency to reversion, which, though it has been greatly exaggerated, no doubt exists, is sometimes to a certain extent intelligible. Thus, with feral pigs, exposure to the weather will probably favour the growth of the bristles, as is known to be the case with the hair of other domesticated animals, and through correlation the tusks will tend to be redeveloped. But the reappearance of coloured longitudinal stripes on young feral pigs cannot be attributed to the direct action of external conditions. In this case, and in many others, we can only say that any change in the habits of life apparently favour a tendency, inherent or latent in the species, to return to the primitive state. It will be shown in a future chapter that the position of flowers on the summit of the axis, and the position of seeds within the capsule, sometimes determine a tendency towards reversion ; and this apparently depends on the amount of sap or nutriment which the flower-buds and seeds receive. The position, also, of buds, either on branches or on roots, some- times determines, as was formerly shown, the transmission of the character proper to the variety, or its reversion to a former state. We have seen in the last section that when two races or species are crossed there is the strongest tendency to the re- appearance in the offspring of long-lost characters, possessed by neither parent nor immediate progenitor. When two white, or red, or black pigeons, of well-established breeds, are united, the offspring are almost sure to inherit the same colours ; but when differently-coloured birds are crossed, the opposed forces of inheritance apparently counteract each other, and the tendency which is inherent in both parents to produce slaty-blue offspring becomes predominant. So it is in several other cases. But when, for instance, the ass is crossed with E. indicus or with the horse,— animals which Chap. XIII. REVERSION. 23 have not striped legs, — and the hybrids have conspicuous stripes on their legs and even on their faces, all that can be said is, that an inherent tendency to reversion is evolved through some disturbance in the organisation caused by the act of crossing. Another form of reversion is far commoner, indeed is almost universal with the offspring from a cross, namely, to the characters proper to either pure parent-form. As a general rule, crossed offspring in the first generation are nearly inter- mediate between their parents, but the grandchildren and succeeding generations continually revert, in a greater or lesser degree, to one or both of their progenitors. Several authors have maintained that hybrids and mongrels include all the characters of both parents, not fused together, but merely mingled in different proj)ortions in different parts of the body; or, as Xaudin50 has expressed it, a hybrid is a living mosaic-work, in whic-h the eye cannot distinguish the discordant elements, so completely are they intermingled. We can hardly doubt that, in a certain sense, this is true, as when we behold in a hybrid the e^ments of both species segregating themselves into segments in the same flower or fruit, by a process of self-attraction or self-affinity ; this segregation taking place either by seminal or bud-propagation. Naudin further believes that the segregation of the two specific elements or essences is eminently liable to occur in the male and female reproductive matter ; and he thus explains the almost universal tendency to reversion in succes- sive hybrid generations. For this would be the natural result of the union of pollen and ovules, in both of which the elements of the same species had been segregated by self- affinity. If, on the other hand, pollen which included the elements of one species happened to unite with ovules includ- ing the elements of the other species, the intermediate or hybrid state would still be retained, and there would be no reversion. But it would, as I suspect, be more correct to say that the elements of both parent-species exist in every hybrid in a double state, namely, blended together and com- 'Xouvclles Archives du Museum,' torn. i. p. 151. 24 INHERITANCE. Chap. XIII. pletely separate. How this is possible, and what the terra specific essence or element may be supposed to express, I shall attempt to show in the chapter on the hypothesis of pangenesis. But Naudin's view, as propounded by him, is not applicable to the reappearance of characters lost long ago by variation ; and it is hardly applicable to races or species which, after having been crossed at some former period with a distinct form, and having since lost all traces of the cross, neverthe- less occasionally yield an individual which reverts (as in the case of the great-great-grandchild of the pointer Sappho) to the crossing form. The most simple case of reversion, namely, of a hybrid or mongrel to its grandparents, is connected by an almost perfect series with the extreme case of a purely-bred race recovering characters which had been lost during many ages ; and we are thus led to infer that all the cases must be related by some common bond. Gartner believed that only highly sterile hybrid plants ex- hibit any tendency to reversion to their parent-forms. This erroneous belief may perhaps be accounted for by the nature of the genera crossed by him, for he admits that the tendency differs in different genera. The statement is also directly con- tradicted by Naudin's observations, and by the notorious fact that perfectly fertile mongrels exhibit the tendency in a high degree, — even in a higher degree, according to Gartner himself, than hybrids.51 Gartner further states that reversions rarely occur with hybrid plants raised from species which have not been culti- vated, whilst, with those which have been long cultivated, they are of frequent occurrence. This conclusion explains a curious discrepancy : Max TVichura,52 who worked exclu- sively on willows which had not been subjected to culture, never saw an instance of reversion ; and he goes so far as to suspect that the careful Gartner had not sufficiently protected his hybrids from the pollen of the parent-species : Naudin, on the other hand, who chiefly experimented on cucurbitaceous and other cultivated plants, insists more strenuously than any other 51 ' Bastarderzeugung,' s. 582, 438, &c 52 ' Die Bastardbefruchtuug , . . der Weiden,' 1865, s. 23. For Gartner's remarks on this head, see 'Bastard- erzeugung,' s. 474, 582. Chap. XIII. REVERSION. 25 author on the tendency to reversion in all hybrids. The con- clusion that the condition of the parent-species, as affected by culture, is one of the proximate causes leading to reversion, agrees well with the converse case of domesticated animals and cultivated plants being liable to reversion when they become feral ; for in both cases the organisation or constitution must be disturbed, though in a very different way.53 Finally, we have seen that characters often reappear in purely-bred races without our being able to assign any proximate cause ; but when they become feral this is either indirectly or directly induced by the change in their condi- tions of life. With crossed breeds, the act of crossing in itself certainly leads to the recovery of long-lost characters, as well as of those derived from either parent-form. Changed conditions, consequent on cultivation, and the relative position of buds, flowers, and seeds on the plant, all apparently aid in giving this same tendency. Reversion may occur either through seminal or bud generation, generally at birth, but sometimes only with an advance of age. Segments or portions of the individual may alone be thus affected. That a being should be born resembling in certain characters an ancestor removed by two or three, and in some cases by hundreds or even thousands of generations, is assuredly a wonderful fact. In these cases the child is commonly said to inherit such characters directly from its grandparent, or more remote ancestors. But this view is hardly conceivable. If, however, we suppose that every character is derived exclusively from the father or mother, but that many characters lie latent or dormant in both parents during a long succession of genera- tions, the foregoing facts are intelligible. In what manner characters may be conceived to lie latent, will be considered in a future chapter to which I have lately alluded. Latent Characters. — But I must explain what is meant by 53 Prof. Weismann, in his very curious essay on the different forms produced by the same species of butterfly at different seasons (' Saison- Dimorphismus der Schmetterlinge,' pp. 27, 28), has come to a similar con- clusion, namely, that any cause which disturbs the organisation, such as the exposure of the cocoons to heat or even to much shaking, gives a tendency to reversion. 20 INHERITANCE. Chap. XIII. characters lying latent. The most obvious illustration is afforded by secondary sexual characters. In every female all the secondary male characters, and in every male all the secondary female characters, apparently exist in a latent state, ready to be evolved under certain conditions. It is well known that a large number of female birds, such as fowls, various pheasants, partridges, peahens, ducks, &c, when old or diseased, or when operated on, assume many or all of the secondary male characters of their species. In the case of the hen-pheasant this has been observed to occur far more frequently during certain years than during others.54 A duck ten years old has been known to assume both the perfect winter and summer plumage of the drake.55 Water- ton 56 gives a curious case of a hen which had ceased laying, and had assumed the plumage, voice, spurs, and warlike disposition of the cock ; when opposed to an enemy she would erect her hackles and show fight. Thus every character, even to the instinct and manner of fighting, must have lain dormant in this hen as long as her ovaria continued to act. The females of two kinds of deer, when old, have been known to acquire horns ; and, as Hunter has remarked, we see some- thing of an analogous nature in the human species. On the other hand, with male animals, it is notorious that the secondary sexual characters are more or less completely lost when they are subjected to castration. Thus, if the operation be performed on a young cock, he never, as Yarrell states, crows again ; the comb, wattles, and spurs do not grow to their full size, and the hackles assume an intermediate appearance between true hackles and the feathers of the hen. Cases are recorded of confinement, which often affects the reproductive system, causing analogous results. But cha- 54 Yarrell, ' Phil. Transact.,' 1827, p. 268; Dr. Hamilton, in ' Proc. Zoolog. Soc.,' 1862, p. 23. 55 ' Archiv. Skand. Beitrage zur Naturgesch.' viii. s. 397-413. 56 In his ' Essays on Nat. Hist.,' 1838, Mr. Hewitt gives analogous cases with hen-pheasants in ' Journal of Horticulture, July 12, 1864, p. 37. Isidore Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, in his ' Essais de Zoolog. Gen.' ('suites a Buffon,' 1842, pp. 496-513), has collected such cases in ten different kinds of birds. It appears that Aristotle was well aware of the change in mental disposition in old hens. The case of the female deer acquiring horns is given at p. 513. Chap. XIII. REVERSION. 27 racters properly confined to the female are likewise acquired by the male ; the capon takes to sitting on eggs, and will bring up chickens ; and what is more curious, the utterly sterile male hybrids from the pheasant and the fowl act in the same manner, " their delight being to watch when the hens leave their nests, and to take on themselves the office of a sitter." 57 That admirable observer Reaumur 58 asserts that a cock, by being long confined in solitude and darkness, can be taught to take charge of young chickens ; he then utters a peculiar cry, and retains during his whole life this newly acquired maternal instinct. The many well-ascertained cases of various male mammals giving milk shows that their rudi- mentary mammary glands retain this capacity in a latent condition. We thus see that in many, probably in all cases, the secondary characters of each sex lie dormant or latent in the opposite' sex, ready to be evolved under peculiar circumstances. "We can thus understand how, for instance, it is possible for a good milking cow to transmit her good qualities through her male offspring to future generations ; for we may confi- dently believe that these qualities are present, though latent, in the males of each generation. So it is with the game-cock, who can transmit his superiority in courage and vigour through his female to his male offspring ; and with man it is known 59 that diseases, such as hydrocele, necessarily confined to the male sex, can be transmitted through the female to the grandson. Such cases as these offer, as was remarked at the commencement of this chapter, the simplest possible examples of reversion ; and they are intelligible on the belief that characters common to the grandparent and grandchild of the same sex are present, though latent, in the intermediate parent of the opposite sex. The subject of latent characters is so important, as we shall see in a future chapter, that I will give another illustration. Many animals have the right and left sides of their body 57 ' Cottage Gardener,' 18G0, p. 59 Sir H. Holland, ' Medical Notes 379. and Reflections,' 3rd edit., 1855, p. 55 'Art de faire Eclore,' &c, 1749, 31. torn. ii. p. 8. 28 INHERITANCE. Chap. XIII. unequally developed : this is well known to be the case with flat-fish, in which the one side differs in thickness and colour and in the shape of the fins, from the other, and during the growth of the young fish one eye is gradually twisted from the lower to the upper surface.60 In most flat-fishes the left is the blind side, but in some it is the right ; though in both cases reversed or" wrong fishes," are occasionally developed ; and in Platessa flesus the right or left side is indifferently the upper one. "With gasteropods or shell-fish, the right and left sides are extremely unlike ; the far greater number of species are dextral, with rare and occasional reversals of development, and some few are normally sinistral ; but certain species of Bulimus, and many Achatinellae,61 are as often sinistral as dextral. I will give an analogous case in the great articulate kingdom : the two sides of Verruca62 are so wonderfully unlike, that without careful dissection it is extremely difficult to recognise the corresponding parts on the opjjosite sides of the body; yet it is apparently a mere matter of chance whether it be the right or the left side that undergoes so singular amount of change. One plant is known to me 03 in which the flower, according as it stands on the one or other side of the spike, is unequally developed. In all the foregoing cases the two sides are perfectly symmetrical at an early period of growth. Now, whenever a species, is as liable to be unequally developed on the one as on the other side, we may infer that the capacity for such development is present, though latent, in the undeveloped side. And as a reversal of development occasionally occurs in animals of many kinds, this latent capacity is probably very common. The best yet simplest cases of characters lying dormant are, perhaps, those previously given, in which chickens and young pigeons, raised from a cross between differently coloured 60 See Steenstrup on the ' Obliquity p. 209. of Flounders ' : in ' Annals and Mag. of 62 Darwin, ' Balanidse,' Ray Soc, Nat. Hist.' May, 1865, p. 361. I 1854, p. 499 : see also the appended have given an abstract of Malm's remarks on the apparently capricious explanation of this wonderful pheno- development of the thoracic limbs on menon in the 'Origin of Species' 6th the right and left sides in the higher Edit. p. 186. crustaceans. 01 Dr. E. von Martens, in ' Annals 63 Mormodes ignea : Darwin, ' Fer- and Mag. of Nat. Hist.' March, 1866, tilisation of Orchids,' 1862, p. 251. Chap. XIII. REVERSION. 29 birds, are at first of one colour, but in a year or two acquire feathers of the colour of the other parent ; for in this case the tendency to a change of plumage is clearly latent in the young bird. So it is with hornless breeds of cattle, some of which acquire small horns as the3T grow old. Purely bred black and white bantams, and some other fowls, occasionally assume, with advancing years, the red feathers of the parent-species. I will here add a somewhat different case, as it connects in a striking manner latent characters of two classes. Mr. Hewitt 64 pos- sessed an excellent Sebright gold-laced bantam hen, which, as she became old, grew diseased in her ovaria, and assumed male characters. In this breed the males resemble the females in all respects except in their combs, wattles, spurs, and instincts ; hence it might have been expected that the diseased hen would have assumed only those masculine characters which are proper to the breed, but she acquired, in addition, well-arched tail sickle-feathers quite a foot in length, saddle- feathers on the loins, and hackles on the neck, — ornaments which, as Mr. Hewitt remarks, " would be held as abominable in this breed." The Sebright bantam is known 65 to have originated about the year 1800 from a cross between a common bantam and a Polish fowl, recrossed by a hen-tailed bantam, and carefully selected ; hence there can hardly be a doubt that the sickle-feathers and hackles which appeared in the old hen were derived from the Polish fowl or common bantam ; and we thus see that not only certain masculine characters proper to the Sebright bantam, but other masculine characters derived from the first progenitors of the breed, removed by a period of above sixty years, were lying latent in this henbird, ready to be evolved as soon as her ovaria became diseased. From these several facts it must be admitted that certain characters, capacities, and instincts, may lie latent in an indi- vidual, and even in a succession of individuals, without our being able to detect the least sign of their presence. When fowls, pigeons, or cattle of different colours are crossed, and 64 ' Journal of Horticulture,' July, 186-i, p. 38. I have had the oppor- tunity of examining these remarkable feathers through the kindness of Mr. Tegetmeier. 65 'The Poultry Book,' by Mr. Tegetmeier, 1866, p. 241. 30 INHERITANCE. Chai\ XIII. their offspring change colour as they grow old, or when the crossed turbit acquired the characteristic frill after its third moult, or when p arely-bred bantams partially assume the red plumage of their prototype, we cannot doubt that these qualities were from the first present, though latent, in the individual animal, like the characters of a moth in the cater- pillar. Now. if these animals had produced offspring before they had acquired with advancing age their new characters, nothing is more probable than that they would have trans- mitted them to some of their offspring, who in this case would in appearanc3 have received such characters from their grand- parents or more distant progenitors. We should then have had a case uf reversion, that is. of the reappearance in the child of an ancestral character, actually present, though during youth completely latent, in the parent ; and this we mav safely conclude is what occurs in all reversions to pro- genitors, however remote. This view of the latency in each generation of all the cha- racters which appear through reversion, is also supported by their actual presence in some cases during early youth alone, or by their more frequent appearance and greater distinctness at this age than during maturity. We have seen that this is often the case with the stripes on the legs and faces of the several species of the horse-genus. The Himalayan rabbit, when crossed, sometimes produces offspring which revert to the parent silver-grey breed, and we have seen that in purely bred animals pale grey fur occasionally reappears during early youth. Black cats, we may feel assured, would <. ccasionally produce by reversion tabbies ; and on young black kittens, with a pedigree66 known to have been long pure, faint traces of stripes may almost always be seen which afterwards dis- appear. Hornless Suffolk cattle occasionally produce by reversion horned animals : and Youatt 67 asserts that even in hornless individuals M the rudiment of a horn may be often felt at an early age." Xo doubt it appears at first sight in the highest degree im- probable that in every horse of every generation there should 66 Carl Vogt, 1 Lectures on Man,' 67 1 On Cattle,' p. 174. Eng. translat., 1834, p. 411. Chap. XIIL EEYEESIOX. 31 be a latent capacity and tendency to produce stripes, though these may not appear once in a thousand generations ; that in every white, black, or other coloured pigeon, which may have transmitted its proper colour during centuries, there should be a latent capacity in the pluniRge to become blue and to be marked with certain characteristic bars ; that in every child in a six-fingered family there should be the capacity for the production of an additional digit ; and so in other cases. Nevertheless, there is no more inherent improbability in this being the case than in a useless and rudimentary organ, or even in only a tendency to the production of a rudimentary organ, being inherited during millions of generations, as is well known to occur with a multitude of organic beings. There is no more inherent improbability in each domestic pig, during a thousand generations, retaining the capacity and tendency to develop great tusks under fitting conditions, than in the young- calf having retained for an indefinite number of generations rudimentary incisor teeth, which never rrotrude through the gums. I shall give at the end of the next chapter a summary of the three preceding chapters ; but as isolated and striking cases of reversion have here been chiefly insisted on, I wish to guard the reader against supposing that reversion is due to some rare or accidental combination of circumstances. When a character, lost during hundreds of generations, suddenly reappears, no doubt some such combination must occur ; but reversions to the immediately preceding generations may be constantly observed, at least, in the offspring of most unions. This has been universally recognised in the case of hybrids and mongrels, but it has been recognised simply from the difference between the united forms rendering the resemblance of the offspring to their grandparents or more remote pro- genitors of easy detection. Reversion is likewise almost in- variably the rule, as Mr. Sedgwick has shown, with certain diseases. Hence we must conclude that a tendency to this peculiar form of transmission is an integral part of the general law of inheritance. Monstrosities. — A large number of monstrous growths and 32 INHERITANCE. Chap. XIII. of lesser anomalies are admitted by every one to be due to an arrest of development, that is, to the persistence of an embry- onic condition. But many monstrosities cannot be thus explained ; for parts of which no trace can be detected in the embryo, but which occur in Gther members of the same class of animals occasionally appear, and these may probably with truth be attributed to reversion. As, however, I have treated this subject as fully as I could in my ' Descent of Man ' (chap, i., 2nd edit.), I will not here recur to it. When flowers which have normally an irregular structure become regular or peloric, the change is generally looked at by botanists as a return to the primitive state. But Dr. Maxwell Masters, 08 who has ably discussed this subject, remarks that when, for instance, all the sepals of a Tropseolum become green and of the same shape, instead of being coloured with one prolonged into a spur, or when all the petals of a Linaria become simple and regular, such cases may be due merely to an arrest of development ; for in these flowers all the organs during their earliest condition are symmetrical, and, if arrested at this stage of growth, they would not become irregular. If, moreover, the arrest were to take place at a still earlier period of development, the result would be a simple tuft of green leaves ; and no one probably would call this a case of reversion. Dr. Masters designates the cases first alluded to as regular peloria ; and others, in which all the corresponding parts assume a similar form of irregularity, as when all the petals in a Linaria become spurred, as irregular peloria. We have no right to attribute these latter cases to reversion, until it can be shown that the parent-form, for instance, of the genus Linaria had had all its petals spurred ; for a chance of this nature might result from the spreading of an anomalous structure, in accordance with the law, to be discussed in a future chapter, of homologous parts tending to vary in the same manner. But as both forms of peloria frequently occur on the same individual plant of the Linaria,69 they probably stand in some close relation to one another. On the doctrine that peloria is simply the result of an arrest of development, it is difficult to understand how an organ arrested at a very early period of growth should acquire its full functional perfection ; — how a petal, supposed to be thus arrested, should acquire its brilliant colours, and serve as an envelope to the flower, or a stamen produce efficient pollen ; yet this occurs with 68 'Natural Hist. Review,' April, 1863, p. 258. See also his Lecture, Royal Institution, March 16, 1860. On same subject, see Moquin-Tandon, ' Elements de Teratologic,' 1841, pp. 184-, 352, Dr. Peyritsch has collected a large number of very interesting cases, Sitzb. d. k. Akad. d. Wissensch. : Wien. Bd. LX. and especially Bd. LXVL, 1872; p. 125. 09 Verlot, 'Des Varictes,' 1865, p. 89 ; Naudin, ' Nouvelles Archives du Museum.' torn. i. p. 137. Chap. XIII. REVERSION. 33 many peloric flowers. That pelorism is not due to mere chance variability, but either to an arrest of development or to reversion, we may infer from an observation made by Ch. Morren,70 namely, that families which have irregular flowers often " return by these monstrous growths to their regular form; whilst we never see a regular flower realise the structure of an irregular one." Some flowers have almost certainly become more or less completely peloric through reversion, as the following interesting case shows. Corydalis tuber osa properly has one of its two nectaries colourless, destitute of nectar, only half the size of the other, and therefore, to a certain extent, in a rudimentary state; the pistil is curved towards the perfect nectary, and the hood, formed of the inner petals, slips off the pistil and stamen in one direction alone, so that, when a bee sucks the perfect nectary, the stigma and stamens are exposed and rubbed against the insect's body. In several closely allied genera, as in Dielytra, &c, there are two perfect nectaries, the pistil is straight, and the hood slips off on either side, accord- ing as the bee sucks either nectary. Now, I have examined several flowers of Corydalis tuberosa, in which both nectaries were equally developed and contained nectar ; in this we see only the redevelop- ment of a partially aborted organ ; but with this redevelopment the pistil becomes straight, and the hood slips off in either direction , so that these flowers have acquired the perfect structure, so well adapted for insect agency, of Dielytra and its allies. We cannot attribute these coadapted modifications to chance, or to correlated variability; we must attribute them to reversion to a primordial condition of the species. The peloric flowers of Pelargonium have their five petals in all respects alike, and there is no nectary ; so that they resemble the symmetrical flowers of the closely allied genus Geranium ; but the alternate stamens are also sometimes destitute of anthers, the shortened filaments being left as rudiments, and in this respect they resemble the symmetrical flowers of the closely allied genus Erodium. Hence we may look at the peloric flowers of Pelargo- nium as having reverted to the state of some primordial form, the progenitor of the three closely related genera of Pelargonium, Geranium, and Erodium. In the peloric form of Antirrhinum majus, appropriately called the " Wonder," the tubular and elongated flowers differ wonderfully from those of the common snapdragon ; the calyx and the mouth of the corolla consist of six equal lobes, and include six equal instead of four unequal stamens. One of the two additional, stamens is manifestly formed by the development of a microscopically minute papilla, which may be found at the base of the upper lip of the flower of the common snapdragons in the nineteen plants examined 70 In his discussion on some curious nal of Horticulture,' Feb. 24, 1863, peloric Calceolarias, quoted in ' Jour- p. 152. 34 INHERITANCE. Chap. XIII. by ine. That this papilla is a rudiment of a stamen was well shown by its various degrees of development in crossed plants between the common and the peloric Antirrhinum. Again, a peloric Gahob- dolon luteum, growing in my garden, had five equal petals, all striped like the ordinary lower lip, and included five equal instead of four unequal stamens ; but Mr. E. Keeley, who sent me this plant, informs me that the flowers vary greatly, having from four to six lobes to the corolla, and from three to six stamens.71 Now, as the members of the two great families to which the Antirrhinum and Galeobdolon belong are properly pentamerous, with some of the parts confluent and others suppressed, we ought not to look at the sixth stamen and the sixth lobe to the corolla in either case as due to reversion, any more than the additional petals in double flowers in these same two families. But the case is different with the fifth stamen in the peloric Antirrhinum, which is produced by the redevelopment of a rudiment always present, and which probably reveals to us the state of the flower, as far as the stamens are con- cerned, at some ancient epoch. It is also difficult to believe that the other four stamens and the petals, after an arrest of develop- ment at a very early embryonic age, would have come to full perfection in colour, structure, and function, unless these organs had at some former period normally passed through a similar course of growth. Hence it appears to me probable that the progenitor of the genus Antirrhinum must at some remote epoch have included five stamens and borne flowers in some degree resembling those now produced by the peloric form. The conclusion that peloria is not a mere monstrosity, irrespective of any former state of the species, is supported by the fact that this structure is often strongly in- herited, as in the case of the peloric Antirrhinum and Gloxinia and sometimes in that of the peloric Corydalis solida.n Lastly I may add that many instances have been recorded of flowers, not generally considered as peloric, in which certain organs are abnormally augmented in number. As an increase of parts cannot be looked at as an arrest of development, nor as due to the redevelopment of rudiments, for no rudiments are present, and as these additional parts bring the plant into closer relationship with its natural allies, they ought probably to be viewed as rever- sions to a primordial condition. These several facts show us in an interesting manner how intimately certain abnormal states are connected together; namely, arrests of development causing parts to become rudi- mentary or to be wholly suppressed, — the redevelopment of 71 For other cases of six divisions in peloric flowers of the Labiatae and Scrophulariaceae, see Moquin-Tandon, ♦Teratologic,' p. ly2. 72 Godron, reprinted from the ' Memoires de l'Acad. de Stanislas,' 1868. Chap. XIII. REVERSION. 35 parts now in a more or less rudimentary condition, — the re- appearance of organs of which not a vestige can be detected, — and to these may be added, in the case of animals, the presence during youth, and subsequent disappearance, of cer- tain characters which occasionally are retained throughout life. Some naturalists look at all such abnormal structures as a return to the ideal state of the group to which the affected being belongs ; but it is difficult to conceive what is meant to be conveyed by this expression. Other naturalists maintain, with greater probability and distinctness of view, that the common bond of connection between the several foregoing cases is an actual, though partial, return to the structure of the ancient progenitor of the group. If this view be correct, we must believe that a vast number of characters, capable of evolution, lie hidden in every organic being. But it would be a mistake to suppose that the number is equally great in all beings. AVe know, for instance, that plants of many orders occasionally become peloric ; but many more cases have been observed in the Labiatse and Scrophulariaceaa than in any other order ; and in one genus of the Scrophulariaceae, namely Linaria, no less than thirteen species have been de- scribed in this condition.73 On this view of the nature of peloric flowers, and bearing in mind certain monstrosities in the animal kingdom, we must conclude that the progenitors of most plants and animals have left an impression, capable of redevelopment, on the germs of their descendants, although these have since been profoundly modified. The fertilised germ of one of the higher animals, subjected as it is to so vast a series of changes from the germinal cell to old age, — incessantly agitated by what Quatrefages well calls the tourbillon vital, — is perhaps the most wonderful object in nature. It is probable that hardly a change of any kind affects either parent, without some mark being left on the germ. But on the doctrine of reversion, as given in this chapter, the germ becomes a far more marvellous object, for, besides the visible changes which it undergoes, we must Moquin-Tandon, ' Teratologie,' p. 186. 36 INHERITANCE. Chap. XIII. believe that it is crowded with invisible characters, proper to both sexes, to both the right and left side of the body, and to a long line of male and female ancestors separated by hundreds or even thousands of generations from the present time : and these characters, like those written on paper with invisible ink, lie ready to be evolved whenever the organisa- tion is disturbed by certain known or unknown conditions. Ciiap. XIV. INHERITANCE : FIXEDNESS OF CHARACTER. 37 CHAPTER XIV. INHERITANCE continued — FIXEDNESS OF CHARACTER — PREPOTENCY — SEXUAL LIMITATION — CORRESPONDENCE OF AGE. FIXEDNESS OF CHARACTER APPARENTLY NOT DUE TO ANTIQUITY OF INHERI- TANCE—PREPOTENCY OF TRANSMISSION LN INDIVIDUALS OF THE SAME FAMILY, IN CROSSED BREEDS AND SPECIES ; OFTEN STRONGER IN ONE SEX THAN THE OTHER ; SOMETIMES DEE TO THE SAME CHARACTER BEING PRESENT AND VISIBLE IN ONE BREED AND LATENT IN THE OTHER — INHERITANCE AS LIMITED BY SEX — NEWLY- ACQUIRED CHARACTERS IN OUR DOMESTICATED ANIMALS OFTEN TRANSMITTED BY ONE SEX ALONE, SOMETIMES LOST BY ONE SEX ALONE — INHERITANCE AT CORRESPONDING PERIODS OF LIFE — THE IMPORTANCE OF THE PRINCIPLE WITH RESPECT TO EMBRYOLOGY ; AS EXHIBITED IN DOMESTICATED ANIMALS : AS EXHIBITED IN THE APPEARANCE AND DISAPPEARANCE OF INHERITED DISEASES; SOMETIMES SUPERVENING EARLIER IN THE CHILD THAN IN THE PARENT — SUMMARY OF THE THREE PRECEDING CHAPTERS. In the last two chapters the nature and force of Inheritance, the circumstances which interfere with its power, and the tendency to Reversion, with its many remarkable contingen- cies, were discussed. In the present chapter some other related phenomena will be treated of, as fully as my materials permit. Fixedness of Character. It is a general belief amongst breeders that the longer any character has been transmitted by a breed, the more fully it will continue to be transmitted. I do not wish to dispute the truth of the proposition that inheritance gains strength simply through long continuance, but I doubt whether it can be proved. In one sense the proposition is little better than a truism ; if any character has remained constant during many generations, it will be likely to continue so, if the conditions of life remain the same. So, again, in improving a breed, if care be taken for a length of time to exclude all inferior individuals, the breed will obviously tend to become truer, as it will not have been crossed during many generations by an inferior animal. We have previously seen, but without 2-t 38 INHERITANCE Chap. XIV. being able to assign any cause, that, when a new character appears, it is occasionally from the first constant, or fluctuates much, or wholly fails to be transmitted. So it is with the aggregate of slight differences which characterise a new variety, for some propagate their kind from the first much truer than others. Even with plants multiplied by bulbs, layers. &c, which may in one sense be said to form parts of the same individual, it is well known that certain varieties retain and transmit through successive bud-generations their newly-acquired characters more truly than others. In none of these, nor in the following cases, does there appear to be any relation between the force with which a character is transmitted and the length of time during which it has been transmitted. Some varieties, such as white and yellow hya- cinths and white sweet-peas, transmit their colours more faithfully than do the varieties which have retained their natural colour. In the Irish family, mentioned in the twelfth chapter, the peculiar tortoiseshell-like colouring of the eyes was transmitted far more faithfully than any ordinary colour. Ancon and Mauchamp sheep and niata cattle, which are all comparatively modern breeds, exhibit remarkably strong powers of inheritance. Many similar cases could be adduced. As all domesticated animals and cultivated plants have varied, and yet are descended from aboriginally wild forms, which no doubt had retained the same character from an immensely remote epoch, we see that scarcely any degree of antiquity ensures a character being transmitted perfectly true. In this case, however, it may be said that changed conditions of life induce certain modifications, and not that the power of inheritance fails ; but in every case of failure, some cause, either internal or external, must interfere. It will generally be found that the organs or parts which in our domesticated productions have varied, or which still continue to vary, — that is. which fail to retain their former state, — are the same with the parts which differ in the natural species of the same genus. As, on the theory of descent with modification, the species of the same genus have been modified since they branched off from a common progenitor, it follows that the characters by which they differ from one another Chap. XIV. FIXEDNESS OF CHARACTER. 39 have varied, whilst other parts of the organisation have re- mained unchanged ; and it might be argued that these same characters now vary under domestication, or fail to be in- herited, from their lesser antiquity. But variation in a state of nature seems to stand in some close relation with changed conditions of life, and characters which have already varied under such conditions would be apt to vary under the still greater changes consequent on domestication, independently of their greater or less antiquity. Fixedness of character, or the strength of inheritance, has often been judged of by the preponderance of certain charac- ters in the crossed offspring between distinct races ; but prepotency of transmission here comes into play, and this, as we shall immediately see, is a very different consideration from the strength or weakness of inheritance.1 It has often been observed that breeds of animals inhabiting wild and mountainous countries cannot be permanently modified by our improved breeds; and as these latter are of modern origin, it has been thought that the greater antiquity of the wilder breeds has been the cause of their resistance to im- provement by crossing ; but it is more probably due to their structure and constitution being better adapted to the sur- rounding conditions. When plants are first subjected to culture, it has been found that, during several generations, they transmit their characters truly, that is, do not vary, and this has been attributed to ancient characters being strongly inherited : but it may with equal or greater probability be consequent on changed conditions of life requiring a long time for their cumulative action. Notwithstanding these considerations, it would perhaps be rash to deny that charac- ters become more strongly fixed the longer they are trans- mitted ; but I believe that the proposition resolves itself into this, — that characters of all kinds, whether new or old, tend to be inherited, and that those which have already withstood all counteracting influences and been truly transmitted, will, as a general rule, continue to withstand them, and conse- quently be faithfully inherited. 1 See Youatt on Cattle, pp. 92, 69, p. 325. Also Dr. Lucas, 1 L'Here\i. 78, 88, 163; and Youatt on Sheep, Nat.,' torn. ii. p. 310. 40 INHERITANCE. Chap. XIV. Prepotency in the Transmission of Character. When individuals, belonging to the same family, but distinct enough, to be recognised, or when two well-marked races, or two species, are crossed, the usual result, as stated in the previous chapter, is, that the offspring in the first generation are intermediate between their parents, or resemble one parent in one part and the other parent in another part. But this is by no means the invariable rule ; for in many cases it is found that certain individuals, races, and species, are prepotent in transmitting their likeness. This subject has been ably discussed by Prosper Lucas,2 but is rendered extremely complex by the prepotency sometimes running equally in both sexes, and sometimes more strongly in one sex than in the other ; it is likewise complicated by the presence of secondary sexual characters, which render the comparison of crossed breeds with their parents difficult. It would appear that in certain families some one ancestor, and after him others in the same family, have had great power in transmitting their likeness through the male line ; for we cannot otherwise understand how the same features should so often be transmitted after marriages with many females, as in the case of the Austrian Emperors ; and so it was, according to Niebuhr, with the mental qualities of certain Eoman families.3 The famous bull Favourite is believed 4 to have had a prepotent influence on the short-horn race. It has also been observed 5 with English race-horses that certain mares have generally transmitted their own character, whilst other mares of equally pure blood have allowed the character of the sire to prevail. A famous black greyhound, Bedlamite, as I hear from Mr. C. M. Brown " invariably got all his " puppies black, no matter what was the colour of the bitch ;" but then Bedlamite " had a preponderance of black in his " blood, both on the sire and dam side." 2 'Hered. Nat.,' torn. ii. pp. 112- 120. 3 Sir H. Holland, 'Chapters on Mental Physiology,' 1852, p. 234. 4 'Gardener's Chronicle,' 1860, p. 270. 5 Mr. N. H. Smith, 1 Observations on Breeding,' quoted in ' Encyclop. of Rural Sports,' p. 278. Chap. XIV. PREPOTENCY OF TRANSMISSION. 41 The truth of the principle of prepotency comes ont more clearly when distinct races are crossed. The improved Short-horns, not- withstanding that the breed is comparatively modern, are generally acknowledged to possess great power in impressing their likeness on all other breeds ; and it is chiefly in consequence of this power that they are so highly valued for exportation.6 Gocline has given a curious case of a ram of a goat-like breed of sheep from the Cape of Good Hope, which produced offspring hardly to be distinguished from himself, when crossed with ewes of twelve other breeds. But two of these half-bred ewes, when put to a merino ram, produced lambs closely resembling the merino breed. Girou de Buzareingues 7 found that of two races of French sheep the ewes of one, when crossed during successive generations with merino rams, yielded up their character far sooner than the ewes of the other race. Sturm and Girou have given analogous cases with other breeds of sheep and with cattle, the prepotency running in these cases through the male side ; but I was assured on good authority in South America, that when niata cattle are crossed with common cattle, though the niata breed is prepotent whether males or females are used, yet that the prepotency is strongest through the female line. The Manx cat is tailless and has long hind legs ; Dr. Wilson crossed a male Manx with common cats, and, out of twenty-three kittens, seventeen were destitute of tails; but when the female Manx was crossed by common male cats all the kittens had tails, though they were generally short and imperfect.8 In making reciprocal crosses between pouter and fantail pigeons, the pouter-race seemed to be prepotent through both sexes over the fantail. But this is probably due to weak power in the fantail rather than to any unusually strong power in the pouter, for I have observed that barbs also preponderate over fantails. This weak- ness of transmission in the fantail, though the breed is an ancient one, is said 9 to be general ; but I have observed one exception to the rule, namely, in a cross between a fantail and laugher. The most curious instance known to me of weak power in both sexes is in the trumpeter pigeon. This breed has been well known for at least 130 years: it breeds perfectly true, as I have been assured by those who have long kept many birds : it is characterised by a peculiar tuft of feathers over the beak, by a crest on the head, by a singular coo quite unlike that of any other breed, and by much- feathered feet. I have crossed both sexes with turbits of two sub- breeds, with almond tumblers, spots, and runts, and reared many mongrels and recrossed them ; and though the crest on the head ' Quoted by Bronn, ' Geschichte der Natur,' b. ii. s. 170. See Sturm, ' Ueber Racen,' 1825, s. 104-107. For tbe niata cattle, see my 4 Journal of Researches,' 1845, p. 146. 7 Lucas, ' L'Heredite Nat.,' torn. ii. p. 112. 8 Mr. Orton, ' Physiology of Breed- ing,' 1855, p. 9. 9 Boitard and Corbie, 1 Les Pigeons,' 1824, p. 224. 12 INHERITANCE. Chap, XIV. and feathered feet were inherited (as is generally the case with most breeds), 1 have never seen a vestige of the tuft over the beak or heard the peculiar coo. Boitard and Corbie 10 assert that this is the invariable result of crossing trumpeters with other breeds : Neumeister,11 however, states that in Germany mongrels have been obtained, though very rarely, which were furnished with the tuft and would trumpet: but a pair of these mongrels with a tuft, which I imported, never trumpeted. Mr. Brent states 12 that the crossed offspring of a trumpeter were crossed with trumpeters for three generations, by which time the mongrels had 7-8ths of this blood in their veins, yet the tuft over the beak did not appear. At the fourth generation the tuft appeared, but the birds though now having 15-16ths trumpeter's blood still did not trumpet. This case well shows the wide difference between inheritance and pre- potency ; for here we have a well-established old race which transmits its characters faithfully, but which, when crossed with any other race, has the feeblest power of transmitting its two chief characteristic qualities. I will give one other instance with fowls and pigeons of weakness and strength in the transmission of the same character to their crossed offspring. The Silk-fowl breeds true, and there is reason to believe is a very ancient race ; but when I reared a large number of mongrels from a Silk-hen by a Spanish cock, not one exhibited even a trace of the so-called silkiness. Mr. Hewitt also asserts that in no instance are the silky feathers transmitted by this breed when crossed with any other variety. But three birds out of many raised by Mr. Orton from a cross between a silk-cock and a bantam-hen had silky feathers.13 So that it is certain that this breed very seldom has the power of transmitting its peculiar plumage to its crossed progeny. On the other hand, there is a silk sub-variety of the fantail pigeon, which has its feathers in nearly the same state as in the Silk-fowl : now we have already seen that fantails, when crossed, possess singularly weak power in transmitting their general qualities ; but the silk sub- variety when crossed with any other small-sized race invariably transmits its silky feathers ! 14 The well-known horticulturist, Mr. Paul, informs me that he fertilised the Black Prince hollyhock with pollen of the White Globe and the Lemonade and Black Prince hollyhocks reciprocally; but not one seedling from these three crosses inherited the black colour of the Black Prince. So, again, Mr. Laxton, who has had such great experience in crossing peas, writes to me that " when- " ever a cross has been effected between a white-blossomed and a " purple -blossomed pea, or between a white-seeded and a purple- " spotted, brown or maple-seeded pea, the offspring seems to lose 10 'Les Pigeons,' pp. 168, 198. 11 'Das Ganze,' &c, 1837, s. 39. 12 ' The Pigeon Book,' p. 46. 13 'Physiology of Breeding,' p. 22 ; Mr. Hewitt, in 'The Poultry Book,' by Tegetmeier, 1866, p. 224. 14 Boitard and Corbie, 'Les Pigeons,' 1824, p. 226. Chap. XIV. PREPOTENCY OF TRANSMISSION. 43 " nearly all the characteristics of the white-flowered and white- " seeded varieties ; and this result follows whether these varieties " have been used as the pollen-bearing or seed-producing parents." The law of prepotency comes into action when species are crossed, as with races and individuals. Gartner has unequivocally shown15 that this is the case with plants. To give one instance: when Kicotiana paniculata and vincceftora are crossed, the character of N. paniculata is- almost completely lost in the hybrid ; but if N. quadrivalvis be crossed with N. viuccejlora, this latter species, which was before so prepotent, now in its turn almost disappears under the power of N. quadrivalvis. It is remarkable that the prepotency of one species over another in transmission is quite in- dependent, as shown by Gartner, of the greater or less facility with which the one fertilises the other. With animals, the jackal is prepotent over the dog, as is stated by Flourens, who made many crosses between these animals ; and this was likewise the case with a hybrid which I once saw between a jackal and a terrier. I cannot doubt, from the observations of Colin and others, that the ass is prepotent over the horse ; the pre- potency in this instance running more strongly through the male than through the female ass ; so that the mule resembles the ass more closely than does the hinny.16 The male pheasant, judging from Mr. Hewitt's descriptions,17 and from the hybrids which I have seen, preponderates over the domestic fowl ; but the latter, as far as colour is concerned, has considerable power of transmission, 15 ' Bastarderzeugung,' s, 256, 290, &c. Naudin (' Nouvelles Archives du Museum/ torn. i. p. 149) gives a striking instance of prepotency in Datura stramonium when crossed with two other species. 16 Flourens, * Longevite Humaine,' p. 144, on crossed jackals. With respect to the difference between the mule and the hinny, I am aware that this has generally been attributed to the sire and dam transmitting their characters differently ; but Colin, who has given in his ' Traite Phys. Comp.,' torn. ii. pp. 537-539, the fullest description which I have met with of these reciprocal hybrids, is strongly of opinion that the ass pre- ponderates in both crosses, but in an unequal degree. This is likewise the conclusion of Flourens, and of Beeh- stein in his ' Naturgeschichte Deutsch- lands,' b. i. s. 294. The tail of the hinny is much more like that of the horse than is the tail of the mule, and this is generally accounted for by the males of both species trans- mitting with greater power this part of their structure ; but a compound hybrid which I saw in the Zoological Gardens, from a mare by a hybrid ass-zebra, closely resembled its mother in its tail. 17 Mr. Hewitt, who has had such great experience in raising these hybrids, says (' Poultry Book,' by Mr. Tegetmeier, 1866, pp. 165-167) that in all, the head was destitute of wattles, comb, and ear-lappets ; and all closely resembled the pheasant in the shape of the tail and general con- tour of the body. These hybrids were raised from hens of several breeds by a cock-pheasant ; but another hybrid, described by Mr. Hewitt, was raised from a hen- pheasant, by a silver-laced Bantam cock, and this possessed a rudimental comb and wattles. 14 INHERITANCE. Chap. XIV. for hybrids raised from five differently coloured hens differed greatly in plumage. I formerly examined some curious hybrids in the Zoological Gardens, between the Penguin variety of the com- mon duck and the Egyptian goose (Anser oegyptiacus) ; and al- though I will not assert that the domesticated variety prepon- derated over the natural species, yet it had strongly impressed its unnatural upright figure on these hybrids. I am aware that such cases as the foregoing have been ascribed by various authors, not to one species, race, or individual being prepotent over the other in impressing its character on its crossed offspring, but to such rules as that the father influences the ex- ternal characters and the mother the internal or vital organs. But the great diversity of the rules given by various authors almost proves their falseness. Dr. Prosper Lucas has fully discussed this point, and has shown 1S that none of the rules (and I could add others to those quoted by him) apply to all animals. Similar rules have been announced for plants, and have been proved by Gartner 13 to be all erroneous. If we confine our view to the domesticated races of a single species, or perhaps even to the species of the same genus, some such rules may hold good ; for instance, it seems that in reciprocally crossing various breeds of fowls the male generally gives colour ; 20 but conspicuous exceptions have passed under my own eyes. It seems that the rain usually gives its peculiar horns and fleece to its crossed offspring, and the bull the presence or absence of horns. In the following chapter on Crossing 1 shall have occasion to show that certain characters are rarely or never blended by cross- ing, but are transmitted in an unmodified state from either parent- form ; I refer to this fact here because it is sometimes accompanied on the one side by prepotency, wlrich thus acquires the false appearance of unusual strength. In the same chapter I shall show that the rate at which a species or breed absorbs and ob- literates another by repeated crosses, depends in chief part on prepotency in transmission. In conclusion, some of the cases above given, — for instance, that of the trumpeter pigeon, — prove that there is a wide difference between mere inheritance and prepotency. This latter power seems to us, in our ignorance, to act in most cases quite capriciously. The very same character, even though it be an abnormal or monstrous one, such as silky feathers, may be transmitted by different species, when crossed, either with prepotent force or singular feebleness. It is obvious, 18 ' L'Hered. Nat./ torn. ii. book ii. Museum,' torn. i. p. 148) has arrived ch. i. at a similar conclusion. 19 ' Bastarderzeugung,' s. 264-266. 20 'Cottage Gardener,' 1856, pp. Naudin (; Nouvelles Archives du 101, 137. Chaf. XIV. PREPOTENCY OF TRANSMISSION. 45 that a purely-bred form of either sex, in all cases in which prepotency does not run more strongly in one sex than the other, will transmit its character with prepotent force over a mongrelised and already variable form.21 From several of the above-given cases we may conclude that mere antiquity of character does not by any means necessarily make it pre- potent. In some cases prepotency apparently depends on the same character being present and visible in one of the two breeds which are crossed, and latent or invisible in the other breed ; and in this case it is natural that the character which is potentially present in both breeds should be prepotent. Thus, we have reason to believe that there is a latent ten- dency in all horses to be dun-coloured and striped ; and when a horse of this kind is crossed with one of any other colour, it is said that the offspring are almost sure to be striped. Sheep have a similar latent tendency to become dark-coloured, and we have seen with what prepotent force a ram with a few black spots, when crossed with white sheep of various breeds, coloured its offspring. All pigeons have a latent tendency to become slaty-blue, with certain character- istic marks, and it is known that, when a bird thus coloured is crossed with one of any other colour, it is most difficult afterwards to eradicate the blue tint. A nearly parallel case is offered by those black bantams which, as they grow old, develope a latent tendency to acquire red feathers. But there are exceptions to the rule : hornless breeds of cattle possess a latent capacity to reproduce horns, yet when crossed with horned breeds they do not invariably produce offspring bearing horns. We meet with analogous cases with plants. Striped flowers, though they can be propagated truly by seed, have a latent tendency to become uniformly coloured, but when once crossed by a uniformly coloured variety, they ever afterwards fail to 21 See some remarks on this head with respect to sheep by Mr. Wilson, in ' Gardener's Chronicle,' 1863, p. 15. Many striking instances of this result are given by M. Malingie-Xouel (' Journ. R. Agricult. Soc./ vol. xiv. 1853, p. 220) with respect to crosses between English and French sheep. He found that he obtained the desired influence of the English breeds by crossing intentionally mongrelised French breeds with pure English breeds. INHERITANCE. Chap. XIY. produce striped seedlings.22 Another case is in some respects more curious : plants bearing peloric flowers have so strong a latent tendency to reproduce their normally irregular flowers, that this often occurs by buds when a plant is trans- planted into poorer or richer soil.23 Now I crossed the peloric snapdragon (Antirrhinum majus), described in the last chapter, with pollen of the common form ; and the latter, reciprocally, with peloric pollen. I thus raised two great beds of seed- lings, and not one was peloric. Xaudin 2i obtained the same result from crossing a peloric Linaria with the common form. I carefully examined the flowers of ninety plants of the crossed Antirrhinum in the two beds, and their structure had not been in the least affected by the cross, except that in a few instances the minute rudiment of the fifth stamen, which is always present, was more fully or even completely de- veloped. It must not be supposed that this entire obliteration of the peloric structure in the crossed plants can be accounted for by any incapacity of transmission ; for I raised a large bed of plants from the peloric Antirrhinum, artificially fer- tilised by its own pollen, and sixteen plants, which alone survived the winter, were all as perfectly peloric as the parent-plant. Here we have a good instance of the wide dif- ference between the inheritance of a character and the power of transmitting it to crossed offspring. The crossed plants, which perfectly resembled the common snapdragon, were allowed to sow themselves, and out of a hundred and twenty- seven seedlings, eighty-eight proved to be common snap- dragons, two were in an intermediate condition between the peloric and normal state, and thirty-seven were perfectly peloric, having reverted to the structure of their one grand- parent. This case seems at first sight to offer an exception to the rule just given, namely, that a character which is present in one form and latent in the other is generally transmitted with prepotent force when the two forms are crossed. For in all the Scrophulariaceee, and especially in the genera Antirrhinum and Linaria, there is, as was shown 22 Verlot, 1 Des Varietes,' 1865, p. 66. 23 Moquin-Tandon, ' Teratologic,' p. 191. 84 1 Nouvelles Archives du Museum,' torn. i. p. 137. Chap. XIV. SEXUAL LIMITATION. 47 iii the last chapter, a strong latent tendency to become peloric ; but there is also, as we have seen, a still stronger tendency in all peloric plants to reacquire their normal irregular structure. So that we have two opposed latent tendencies in the same plants. Now, with the crossed Antirrhinums the tendency to produce normal or irregular flowers, like those of the common Snapdragon, prevailed in the first generation ; whilst the tendency to pelorism, ap- pearing to gain strength by the intermission of a generation, prevailed to a large extent in the second set of seedlings. How it is possible for a character to gain strength by the intermission of a generation, will be considered in the chapter on pangenesis. On the whole, the subject of prepotency is extremely intri- cate,— from its varying so much in strength, even in regard to the same character, in different animals, — from its running either equally in both sexes, or, as frequently is the case with animals, but not with plants, much stronger in one sex than the other, — from the existence of secondary sexual charac- ters,— from the transmission of certain characters being limited, as we shall immediately see, by sex, — from certain characters not blending together, — and, perhaps, occasionally from the effects of a previous fertilisation on the mother. It is therefore not surprising that no one has hitherto succeeded in drawing up general rules on the subject of prepotency. Inheritance as limited by Sex. New characters often appear in one sex, and are afterwards transmitted to the same sex, either exclusively or in a much greater degree than to the other. This subject is important, because with animals of many kinds in a state of nature, both high and low in the scale, secondary sexual characters, not directly connected with the organs of reproduction, are con- spicuously present. With our domesticated animals, characters of this kind often differ widely from those distinguishing the two sexes of the parent species ; and the principle of inheri- tance, as limited by sex, explains how this is possible. 48 INHERITANCE. Chap. XIV. Dr. P. Lucas has shown25 that when a peculiarity, in no manner connected with the reproductive organs, appears in either parent, it is often transmitted exclusively to the offspring of the same sex, or to a much greater number of them than of the opposite sex. Thus, in the family of Lambert, the horn-like projections on the skin were transmitted from the father to his sons and grandsons alone; so it has been with other cases of ichthyosis, with super- numerary digits, with a deficiency of digits and phalanges, and in a lesser degree with various diseases, especially with colour-blindness and the hsemorrhagic diathesis, that is, an extreme liability to profuse and uncontrollable bleeding from trifling wounds. On the other hand, mothers have transmitted, during several generations, to their daughters alone, supernumerary and deficient digits, colour-blindness and other peculiarities. So that the very same peculiarity may become attaced to either sex, and be long inherited by that sex alone ; but the attachment in certain cases is much more frequent to one than the other sex. The same peculiarities also may be promiscuously transmitted to either sex. Dr. Lucas gives other cases, showing that the male occasionally transmits his peculiarities to his daughters alone, and the mother to her sons alone; but even in this case we see that inheritance is to a certain extent, though inversely, regulated by sex. Dr. Lucas, after weighing the whole evidence, comes to the conclusion that every peculiarity tends to be transmitted in a greater or lesser degree to that sex in which it first appears. But a more definite rule, as I have elsewhere shown,26 generally holds good, namely, that variations which first appear in either sex at a late period of life, when the reproductive functions are active, tend to be developed in that sex alone ; whilst variations which first appear early in life in either sex are commonly trans- mitted to both sexes. I am, however, far from supposing that this is the sole determining cause. A few details from the many cases collected by Mr. Sedgwick,27 may be here given. Colour-blindness, from some unknown cause, shows itself much oftener in males than in females ; in upwards of two hundred cases collected by Mr. Sedgwick, nine-tenths related to men ; but it is eminently liable to be transmitted through women. In the case given by Dr. Earle, members of eight related families were affected during five generations : these families consisted of sixty-one individuals, namely, of thirty-two males, of whom nine- sixteenths were incapable of distinguishing colour, and of twenty- nine females, of whom only one-fifteenth were thus affected. Although colour-blindness thus generally clings to the male sex, 23 ' L'Hered. Nat.,' torn. ii. pp. 137- 1»55. See, also, Mr. Sedgwick's four memoirs, immediately to be referred to. 26 1 Descent of Man,' 2nd edit., p. 32. 27 On Sexual Limitation in Heredi- tary Diseases, 'Brit, an 1 For. Med. - Chirurg. Review,' April 1861, p. 477 ; July, p. 198 ; April 1863, p. 445 ; and July, p. 159. Also in 1867, 'On the influence of Age in Hereditary Dit^ase.' Chap. XIV. SEXUAL LIMITATION. 49 nevertheless, in one instance in which it first appeared in a female, it was transmitted during five generations to thirteen individuals, all of whom were females. The hsemorrhagic diathesis, often accom- panied by rheumatism, has been known to affect the males alone during five generations, being transmitted, however, through the females. It is said that deficient phalanges in the fingers have been inherited by the females alone during ten generations. In another case, a man thus deficient in both hands and feet, trans- mitted the peculiarity to his two sons and one daughter ; but in the third generation, out of nineteen grandchildren, twelve sons had the family defect, whilst the seven daughters were free. In ordinary cases of sexual limitation, the sons or daughters inherit the peculiarity, whatever it may be, from their father or mother, and transmit it to their children of the same sex ; but generally with the hemorrhagic diathesis, and often with colour-blindness, and in some other cases, the sons never inherit the peculiarity directly from their fathers, but the daughters alone transmit the latent tendency, so that the sons of the daughters alone exhibit it. Thus the father, grandson, and great-great-grandson will exhibit a peculiarity, — the grandmother, daughter, and great-grand-daughter having transmitted it in a latent state. Hence we have, as Mr. Sedgwick remarks, a double kind of atavism or reversion; each grandson apparently receiving and developing the peculiarity from his grandfather, and each daughter apparently receiving the latent tendency from her grandmother. From the various facts recorded by Dr. Prosper Lucas, Mr. Sedgwick, and others, there can be no doubt that peculiarities first appearing in either sex, though not in any way necessarily or invariably connected with that sex, strongly tend to be inherited by the offspring of the same sex, but are often transmitted in a latent state through the opposite sex. Turning now to domesticated animals, we find that certain characters not proper to the parent species are often confined to, and inherited by, one sex alone ; but we do not know the history of the first appearance of such characters. In the chapter on Sheep, we have seen that the males of certain races differ greatly from the females in the shape of their horns, these being absent in the ewes of some breeds ; they differ also in the development of fat in the tail and in the outline of the forehead* These differences, judging from the character of the allied wild species, cannot be accounted for by supposing that they have been derived from distinct parent forms. There is, also, a great difference between the horns of the two sexes in one Indian breed of goats. The bull zebu is said to have a larger hump than the cow. In the Scotch deer-hound the two sexes differ in size more than in any other variety of the dog,28 and, judging from analogy, more than in the aboriginal parent-species. The peculiar colour called tortoise- W. Scrope, ' Art of Deer Stalking,' p. 354. 50 INHERITANCE. Chap. XIV. shell is very rarely seen in a male cat ; the males of this variety being of a rusty tint. In various breeds of the fowl the males and females often differ greatly ; and these differences are far from being the same with those winch distinguish the two sexes of the parent-species, the f J alius bankiva : and consequently have originated under domesti- cation. In certain sub-varieties of the Game race we have the unusual case of the hens differing from each other more than the cocks. In an Indian breed of a white colour shaded with black, the hens invariably have black skins, and their bones are coveted by a black periosteum, whilst the cocks are never or most rarely thus characterised. Pigeons offer a more interesting case : for throughout the whole great family the two sexes do not often differ much ; and the males and females of the parent-form, the C. livia, are undistin- guishable : yet we have seen that with pouters the male has the characteristic quality of pouting more strongly developed than the female: and in certain sub-varieties the males alone are spotted or striated with black, or otherwise differ in colour. When male and female English carrier-pigeons are exhibited in separate pens, the difference in the development of the wattle over the beak and round the eyes is conspicuous. So that here we have instances of the appearance of secondary sexual characters in the domesticated races of a species in which such differences are naturally quite absent. On the other hand, secondary sexual characters which belong to the species in a state of nature are sometimes quite lost, or greatly diminished, nnder domestication. We see this in the small size of the tusks in our improved breeds of the pig. in comparison with those of the wild boar. There are sub-breeds of fowls, in which the males have lost the fine- flowing tail-feathers and hackles ; and others in which there is no difference in colour between the two sexes. In some cases the barred plumage, which in gallinaceous birds is commonly the attribute of the hen. has been transferred to the cock, as in the cuckoo sub-breeds. In other cases mascu- line characters have been partly transferred to the female, as with the splendid plumage of the golden-spangled Hamburg hen, the enlarged comb of the Spanish hen, the pugnacious disposition of the Game hen, and as in the well-developed spurs which occasionally appear in the hens of various breeds. In Polish fowls both sexes are ornamented with a topknot, that of the male being formed of hackle-like feathers, and this is a new male character in the genus Gallus. On the Chav. xiy. at corresponding periods. 51 whole, as far as I can judge, new characters are more apt to appear in the males of our domesticated animals than in the females,29 and afterwards to be inherited exclusively or more strongly by the males. Finally, in accordance with the principle of inheritance as limited by sex, the preserva- tion and augmentation of secondary sexual characters in natural species offers no especial difficulty, as this would follow through that form of selection which T have called sexual selection. Inheritance at corresponding periods of Life. This is an important subject. Since the publication of my • Origin of Species,' I have seen no reason to doubt the truth of the explanation there given of one of the most remarkable facts in biology, namely, the difference between the embryo and the adult animal. The explanation is, that variations do not necessarily or generally occur at a very early period of embryonic growth, and that such variations are inherited at a corresponding age. As a consequence of this the embryo, even after the parent-form has undergone great modification, is left only slightly modified ; and the embryos of widely- different animals which are descended from a common pro- genitor remain in many important respects like one another and probably like their common progenitor. VTe can thus understand why embryology throws a flood of light on the natural system of classification, as this ought to be as far as possible genealogical. AVhen the embryo leads an inde- pendent life, that is, becomes a larva, it has to be adapted to the surrounding conditions in its structure and instincts, independently of those of its parents ; and the principle of inheritance at corresponding periods of life renders this possible. This principle is, indeed, in one way so obvious that it escapes attention. We possess a number of races of animals and plants, which, when compared with one another and with 29 I have given in my ' Descent of usually more variable than the fe- Man' (2nd edit. p. 223) sufficient males, evidence that male animals are 52 INHERITANCE. Chap. XIV. their parent-forms, present conspicuous differences, both in their immature and mature states. Look at the seeds of the several kinds of peas, beans, maize, which can be propagated truly, and see how they differ in size, colour, and shape, whilst the full-grown plants differ but little. Cabbages, on the other hand, differ greatly in foliage and manner of growth, but hardly at all in their seeds ; and generally it will be found that the differences between cultivated plants at dif- ferent periods of growth are not necessarily closely connected together, for plants may differ much in their seeds and little when full-grown, and conversely may yield seeds hardly distinguishable, yet differ much when full-grown. In the several breeds of poultry, descended from a single species, differences in the eggs and chickens whilst covered with down, in the plumage at the first and subsequent moults, as well as in the comb and wattles, are all inherited. With man peculiarities in the milk and second teeth (of which I have received the details) are inheritable, and longevity is often transmitted. So again with our improved breeds of cattle and sheep, early maturity, including the early develop- ment of the teeth, and with certain breeds of fowl the early appearance of secondary sexual characters, all come under the same head of inheritance at corresponding periods. Numerous analogous facts could be given. The silk-moth, perhaps, offers the best instance ; for in the breeds which transmit their characters truly, the eggs differ in size, colour, and shape : the caterpillars differ, in moulting three or four times, in colour, even in having a dark-coloured mark like an eyebrow, and in the loss of certain instincts ; — the cocoons differ in size, shape, and in the colour and quality of the silk ; these several differences being followed by slight or barely distinguishable differences in the mature moth. But it may be said that, if in the above cases a new pecu- liarity is inherited, it must be at the corresponding stage of development ; for an egg or seed can resemble only an egg or seed, and the horn in a full-grown ox can resemble only a horn. The following cases show inheritance at corresponding periods more plainly, because they refer to peculiarities which might have supervened, as far as we can see, earlier or later Chap. XIV. AT CORRESPONDING PERIODS. 53 in life, jet are inherited at the same period at which they first appeared. In the Lambert family the porcupine-like excrescences appeared in the father and sons at the same age, namely, about nine weeks after birth.30 In the extraordinary hairy family described by Mr. Crawford,51 children were produced during three generations with hairy ears ; in the father the hair began to grow over his body at six years old; in his daughter somewhat earlier, namely, at one year ; and in both generations the milk teeth appeared late in life, the permanent teeth being afterwards singularly deficient. Grey- ness of hair at an unusually early age has been transmitted in some families. These cases border on diseases inherited at corresponding periods of life, to which I shall immediately refer. It is a well-known peculiarity with almond-tumbler pigeons, that the full beauty and peculiar character of the plumage does not appear until the bird has moulted two or three times. Neumeister describes and figures a brace of pigeons in which the whole body is white except the breast, neck, and head ; but in their first plumage all the white feathers have coloured edges. Another breed is more remarkable : its first plumage is black, with rusty-red wing-bars and a crescent-shaped mark on the breast ; these marks then become white, and remain so during three or four moults ; but after this period the white spreads over the body, and the bird loses its beauty.32 Prize canary-birds have their wings and tail black : " this colour, however, is only retained until the first moult, so that " they must be exhibited ere the change takes place. Once " moulted, the peculiarity has ceased. Of course all the birds " emanating from this stock have black wings and tails the first year."33 A curious and somewhat analogous account has been given 34 of a family of wild pied rooks which were first observed in 1798, near Chalfont, and which every year from that date up to the period of the published notice, viz., 1837, " have several of their " brood particoloured, black and white. This variegation of the " plumage, however, disappears with the first moult ; but among ? the next young families there are always a few pied ones." These changes of plumage, which are inherited at various corre- sponding periods of life in the pigeon, canary-bird, and rook, are remarkable, because the parent-species passes through no such change. Inherited diseases afford evidence in some respects of less value 30 Prichard, ' Phys. Hist, of Man- kind,' 1851, vol. i. p. 349. 31 ' Embassy to the Court of Ava,' vol. i. p. 320. The third generation is described by Capt. Yule in his ' Narrative of the Mission to the Court of Ava,' 1855, p. 94. 32 1 Das Ganze der Taubenzucht,' 1837, s. 24, tab. iv., fig. 2 ; s. 21, tab. i.; fig. 4. 33 Kidd's ' Treatise on the Canary,' p. 18. 34 Charlesworth, 'Mag. of Nat. Hist.,' vol. i. 1837, p. 167. 54 INHERITANCE. Cuap. XIV than the foregoing cases, because diseases are not necessarily con- nected with any change in structure ; but in other respects of more value, because the periods have been more carefully observed. Certain diseases are communicated to the child apparently by a process like inoculation, and the child is from the first affected; such cases may be here passed over. Large classes of diseases usually appear at certain ages, such as St. Vitus's dance in youth, consumption in early mid-life, gout later, and apoplexy still later ; and these are naturally inherited at the same period. But even in diseases of this class, instances have been recorded, as with St. Vitus's dance, showing that an unusually early or late tendency to the disease is inheritable.35 In most cases the appearance of any inherited disease is largely determined by certain critical periods in each person's life, as well as by unfavourable conditions. There are many other diseases, which are not attached to any particular period, but which certainly tend to appear in the child at about the same age at which the parent was first attacked. An array of high authorities, ancient and modern, could be given in support of this proposition. The illustrious Hunter believed in it; andPiorry36 cautions the physician to look closely to the child at the period when any grave inheritable disease attacked the parent. Dr. Prosper Lucas,37 after collecting facts from every source, asserts that affections of all kinds, though not related to any particular period of life, tend to reappear in the offspring at whatever period of life they first appeared in the progenitor. As the subject is important, it may be well to give a few instances, simply as illustrations, not as proof; for proof, recourse must be had to the authorities above quoted. Some of the following cases have been selected for the sake of showing that, when a slight departure from the rule occurs, the child is affected some- what earlier in life than the parent. In the family of Le Compte blindness was inherited through three generations, and no less than twenty-seven children and grandchildren were all affected at about the same age; their blindness in general began to advance about the fifteenth or sixteenth year, and ended in total deprivation of sight at the age of about twenty-two.38 In another case a father and his four children all became blind at twenty-one years old ; in another, a grandmother grew blind at thirty-five, her daughter at nineteen, and three grandchildren at the ages of thirteen and eleven.39 35 Dr. Prosper Lucas, ' Hered. Nat.,' torn. ii. p. 713. 36 ' L'Hered. dans les Maladies,' 1840, p. 135. For Hunter, see Har- lan's ' Med. Researches,' p. 530. 37 ' L'Hered. Nat.,' torn. ii. p. 850. 38 Sedgwick, ' Brit, and For. Med.- Chirurg. Review,' April, 1861, p. 485. In some accounts the number of children and grandchildren is given as 37 ; but this seems to be an error judging from the paper first published in the 1 Baltimore Med. and Phys. Reg.' 1809, of which Mr. Sedgwick has been so kind as to send me a copy. 39 Prosper Lucas, 'Hered. Nat.' torn. i. p. 400. Chap. XIV. AT COEEESPONDING PEEIODS. 55 So with deafness, two brothers, their father and paternal grand- father, all became deaf at the age of forty.40 Esquirol gives several striking instances of insanity coming on at the same age, as that of a grandfather, father, and son, who all committed suicide near their fiftieth year. Many other cases could be given, as of a whole family who became insane at the age of forty.41 Other cerebral affections sometimes follow the same rule, — for instance, epilepsy and apoplexy. A woman died of the latter disease when sixty-three years old ; one of her daughters at forty- three, and the other at sixty-seven : the latter had twelve children, who all died from tubercular meningitis.42 I mention this latter case because it illustrates a frequent occurrence, namely, a change in the precise nature of an inherited disease, though still affecting the same organ. Asthma has attacked several members of the same family when forty years old, and other families during infancy. The most different diseases, such as angina pectoris, stone in the bladder, and various affections of the skin, have appeared in successive genera- tions at nearly the same age. The little finger of a man began from some unknown cause to grow inwards, and the same finger in his two sons began at the same age to bend inwards in a similar manner. Strange and inexplicable neuralgic affections have caused parents and children to suffer agonies at about the same period of life.43 I will give only two other cases, which are interesting as illustrating the disappearance as well as the appearance of disease at the same age. Two brothers, their father, their paternal uncles, seven cousins, and their paternal grandfather, were all similarly affected by a skin-disease, called pityriasis versicolor ; " the disease, strictly limited to the males of the family (though transmitted through the females), usually appeared at puberty, and dis- appeared at about the age of forty or forty-five years." The second case is that of four brothers, who when about twelve years old suffered almost every week from severe headaches, which were relieved only by a recumbent position in a dark room. Their father, paternal uncles, paternal grandfather, and granduncles all suffered in the same way from headaches, which ceased at the age of fifty-four or fifty-five in all those who lived so long. None of the females of the family were affected.44 It is impossible to read the foregoing accounts, and the many others which have been recorded, of diseases coming 40 Sedgwick, ibid., July, 1861, p. 202. 41 Pioriy, p. 109 ; Prosper Lucas, torn. ii. p. 759. 42 Prosper Lucas, torn. ii. p. 748. 43 Prosper Lucas, torn. iii. pp. 678, 700, 702; Sedgwick, ibid., April, 1863, p. 449, and July, 1863, p. 162 , Dr. J. Steinan, ' Essay on Hereditary Disease,' 1843, pp. 27, 34. 44 These cases are given by Mr. Sedgwick, on the authority of Dr. H. Stewart, in ' Med.-Chirurg. Review,' April, 1863, pp. 449, 477. 56 INHEEITANCE. Chap. XIV. on during three or even more generations in several members of the same family at the same age, especially in the case of rare affections in which the coincidence cannot be attributed to chance, and to doubt that there is a strong tendency to in- heritance in disease at corresponding periods of life. When the rule fails, the disease is apt to come on earlier in the child than in the parent ; the exceptions in the other direction being very much rarer. Dr. Lucas 45 alludes to several cases of inherited diseases coming on at an earlier period. I have already given one striking instance with blindness during three generations ; and Mr. Bowman remarks that this fre- quently occurs with cataract. With cancer there seems to be a peculiar liability to earlier inheritance : Sir J. Paget, who has particularly attended to this subject, and tabulated a large number of cases, informs me that he believes that in nine cases out of ten the later generation suffers from the disease at an earlier period than the previous generation. He adds, " In the instances in which the opposite relation holds, and the members of later generations have cancer at a later age than their predecessors, I think it will be found that the non-cancerous parents have lived to extreme old ages." So that the longevity of a non-affected parent seems to have the power of influencing the fatal period in the offspring ; and we thus apparently get another element of complexity in inheritance. The facts, showing that with certain diseases the period of inheritance occasionally or even frequently advances, are important with respect to the general descent- theory, for they render it probable that the same thing would occur with ordinary modifications of structure. The final result of a long series of such advances would be the gradual obliteration of characters proper to the embryo and larva, which would thus come to resemble more and more closely the mature parent-form. But any structure which was of service to the embryo or larva would be preserved by the destruction at this stage of growth of each individual which manifested any tendency to lose its proper character at too early an age. 45 ' Hered. Nat.,' torn. ii. p. 852. Chat. XIV. SUMMARY, 57 Finally, from the numerous races of cultivated plants and domestic animals, in which the seeds or eggs, the young or old, differ from one another and from those of the parent- species ;— from the cases in which new characters have ap- peared at a particular period, and afterwards been inherited at the same period ; — and from what we know with respect to disease, we must believe in the truth of the great principle of inheritance at corresponding periods of life. Summary of the three preceding Chapters. — Strong as is the force of inheritance, it allows the incessant appearance of new characters. These, whether beneficial or injurious, — of the most trifling importance, such as a shade of colour in a flower, a coloured lock of hair, or a mere gesture, — or of the highest importance, as when affecting the brain, or an organ so perfect and complex as the eye, — or of so grave a nature as to deserve to be called a monstrosit}', — or so peculiar as not to occur normally in any member of the same natural class, — are often inherited by man, by the lower animals, and plants. In numberless cases it suffices for the inheritance of a pecu- liarity that one parent alone should be thus characterised. Inequalities in the two sides of the body, though opposed to the law of symmetry, may be transmitted. There is ample evidence that the effects of mutilations and of accidents, es- pecially or perhaps exclusively when followed by disease, are occasionally inherited. There can be no doubt that the evil effects of the long-continued exposure of the parent to in- jurious conditions are sometimes transmitted to the offspring. iSo it is, as we shall see in a future chapter, with the effects gf the use and disuse of parts, and of mental habits. Periodi- cal habits are likewise transmitted, but generally, as it would appear, with little force. Hence we are led to look at inheritance as the rule, and non-inheritance as the anomaly. But this power often ap- pears to us in our ignorance to act capriciously, transmitting a character with inexplicable strength or feebleness. The very same peculiarity, as the weeping habit of trees, silky feathers, 61 ON CROSSING AS A CAUSE. Chap. XV. this will lead to the mongrels increasing more rapidly than the pnre parent-breeds. When listinct breeds are allowed to cross freely, the result will be a heterogeneous body ; for instance, the dogs in Para- guay are far from uniform, and can no longer be affiliated to their parent -races.4 The character which a crossed body of animals will ultimately assume must depend on several con- tingencies,— namely, on the relative members of the individuals belonging to the two or more races which are allowed to mingle ; on the prepotency of one race over the other in the transmission of character ; and on the conditions of life to which they are exposed. When two commingled breeds exist at first in nearly equal numbers, the whole will sooner or later become intimately blended, but not so soon, both breeds being equally favoured in all respects, as might have been expected. The following calculation 5 shows that this is the case : if a colony with an equal number of black and white men were founded, and we assume that they marry indis- criminately, are equally prolific, and that one in thirty annually dies and is born ; then "in 65 years the number of " blacks, whites, and mulattoes would be equal. In 91 years " the whites would be l-10th, the blacks 1-1 Oth, and the " mulattoes, or people of intermediate degrees of colour, " 8-10ths of the whole number. In three centuries not " l-100th part of the whites would exist." "When one of two mingled races exceed the other greatly in number, the latter will soon be wholly, or almost wholly, absorbed and lost.6 Thus European pigs and dogs have been largely introduced in the islands of the Pacific Ocean, and the native races have been absorbed and lost in the course of about fifty or sixty years ; 7 but the imported races no doubt were favoured. Eats maybe considered as semi-domesticated animals. Some snake-rats (Mus alexandrinus) escaped in the Zoological Gardens of London, " and for a long time after- 4 Rengger, ' Saugethiere,' &c, s. 154. 5 White, 1 Regular Gradation in Man,' p. 146. 6 Dr. W. F. Edwards, in his < Ca- racteres Physiolog. des Races Hu- maines,' p. 24, first called attention to this subject, and ably discussed it. 7 Rev. D. Tyerman and Bennett, 1 Journal of Voyages,' 1821-1829, vol. i. p. 300. Chap. XV. OF UNIFORMITY OF CHARACTER. 65 " wards the keepers frequently caught cross-bred rats, at " first half-breds, afterwards with less of the character of the " snake-rat, till at length all traces of it disappeared.8 On the other hand, in some parts of London, especially near the docks, where fresh rats are frequently imported, an endless variety of intermediate forms may be found between the brown, black, and snake rat, which are all three usually ranked as distinct species. How many generations are necessary for one species or race to absorb another by repeated crosses has often been dis- cussed; 9 and the requisite number has probably been much exaggerated. Some writers have maintained that a dozen or score, or even more generations, are necessary ; but this in itself is improbable, for in the tenth generation there would be only 1-1 024th part of foreign blood in the offspring. Gartner found,10 that with plants, one species could be made to absorb another in from three to five generations, and he believes that this could always be effected in from six to seven generations. In one instance, however, Kolreuter11 speaks of the offspring of Mirabilis vulgaris, crossed during eight successive generations by M. longiflora, as resembling this latter species so closely, that the most scrupulous observer could detect " vix aliquam notabilem differentiam " or, as he says, he suceeeded, " ad plenariam fere transmuta- tionem." But this expression shows that the act of absorp- tion was not even then absolutely complete, though these crossed plants contained only the l-256th part of M. vulgaris. The conclusions of such accurate observers as Gartner and Kolreuter are of far higher worth than those made without scientific aim by breeders. The most precise account which I have met with is given by Stonehenge,12 and is illustrated by photographs. Mr. Hanley crossed a, greyhound bitch with a bulldog ; the offspring in each succeeding generation being recrossed with first-rate greyhounds. As Stonehenge remarks, 8 Mr. S. J. Salter, < Journal Linn. Soc.,' vol. vi., 18(32, p. 71. 9 Sturm, ' Ueber Racen, &c.,' 1825, s. 107. Bronn, ' Geschichte der Na- tur,' b. ii. s. 170, gives a table of the proportions of blood after successive crosses. Dr. P. Lucas, ' L'Heredite Nat.,' torn. ii. p. 308. 10 ' Bastarderzeugung,' s. 463, 470. 11 'Nova Acta Petrop.,' 1794, p. 393 : see also previous volume. 12 ' The Dog,' 1867, pp. 179-184. 66 ON CROSSING AS A CAUSE Chap. XV it might naturally be supposed that it would take several crosses to get rid of the heavy form of the bulldog; but Hysterics, I he gr-gr-granddaughter of a bulldog, showed no trace whatever of this breed in external form. She and all of the same litter, however, were " remarkably deficient in " stoutness, though fast as well as clever." I believe clever refers to skill in turning. Hysterics was put to a son of Bedlamite, " but the result of the fifth cross is not as yet, I M believe, more satisfactory than that of the fourth." On the other hand, with sheep, Fleischmann 13 shows how persistent the effects of a single cross may be : he says " that the original " coarse sheep (of Germany) have 5500 fibres of wool on a " square inch ; grades of the third or fourth Merino cross " produced about bOOO, the twentieth cross 27,000, the per- " feet pure Merino blood 40,000 to 48,000." So that common German sheep crossed twenty times successively with Merino did not by any menus acquire wool as fine as that of the pure breed. But in all cases, the rate of absorption will depend largely on the conditions of life being favourable to any particular character ; and we may suspect that there would be a constant tendency to degeneration in the wool of Merinos under the climate of Germany, unless prevented by careful selection ; and thus perhaps the foregoing remarkable case may be explained. The rate of absorption must also depend on the amount of distinguishable difference between the two forms which are crossed, and especially, as Gartner insists, on prepotency of transmission in the one form over the other. We have seen in the last chapter that one of two French breeds of sheep yielded up its character, when crossed with Merinos, very much more slowly than the other ; and the common German sheep referred to by Fleischmann may be in tliis respect analogous. In all cases there will be more or less liability to reversion during many subsequent generations, and it is this fact which has probably led authors to maintain that a score or more of generations are requisite for one race to absorb another. In considering the final result of the commingling of two or more breeds, we must not forget that 13 As quoted in the ' True Principles of Breeding,' by C. H. Macknight and Dr. H. Madden, 1865, p. 11. Chap. XV. OF UNIFORMITY OF CHARACTER. 67 the act of crossing in itself tends to bring back long-lost characters not proper to the immediate parent-forms. With respect to the influence of the conditions of life on any two breeds which are allowed to cross freely, unless both are indigenous and have long been accustomed to the country where they live, they will, in all probability, be unequally affected by the conditions, and this will modify the result. Even with indigenous breeds, it will rarely or never occur that both are equally well adapted to the surrounding cir- cumstances ; more especially when permitted to roam freely, and not carefully tended, as is generally the case with breeds allowed to cross. As a consequence of this, natural selection will to a certain extent come into action, and the best fitted will survive, and this will aid in determining the ultimate character of the commingled body. How long a time it would require before such a crossed body of animals would assume a uniform character within a limited area, no one can say ; that they would ultimately become uniform from free intercrossing, and from the survival of the fittest, we may feel assured ; but the characters thus acquired would rarely or never, as may be inferred from the previous considerations, be exactly intermediate between those of the two parent-breeds. With respect to the very slight differences by which the individuals of the same sub-variety, or even of allied varieties, are characterised, it is obvious that free crossing would soon obliterate such small distinctions. The formation of new varieties, independently of selection, would also thus be prevented ; except when the same variation continually recurred from the action of some strongly pre- disposing cause. We may therefore conclude that free crossing has in all cases played an important part in giving uniformity of character to all the members of the same domestic race and of the same natural species, though largely governed by natural selection and by the direct action of the surrounding conditions. On the possibility of all organic brings occasionally intercrossing. — But it may be asked, can free crossing occur with herma- phrodite animals and plants ? All the higher animals, and the few insects which have been domesticated, have separate ON ALL ORGANIC BEINGS Chap. XV. sexes, and must inevitably unite for each birth. With respect to the crossing of hermaphrodites, the subject is too large for the present volume, but in the ' Origin of Species,' I have given a short abstract of the reasons which induce me to believe that all organic beings occasionally cross, though perhaps in some cases only at long intervals of time.14 I will merely recall the fact that many plants, though herma- phrodite in structure, are unisexual in function ; — such as those called by C. K. Sprengel dichogamoits, in which the pollen and stigma of the same flower are matured at different periods ; or those called by me reciprocally dimorphic, in which the flower's own pollen is not fitted to fertilise its own stigma; or again, the many kinds in which curious mechani- cal contrivances exist, effectually preventing self- fertilisation. There are, however, many hermaphrodite plants wnich are not in any way specially constructed to favour intercrossing, but which nevertheless commingle almost as freely as animals with separated sexes. This is the case with cabbages, radishes, and onions, as I know from having experimented on them : even the peasants of Liguria say that cabbages must be prevented " from falling in love " with each other. In the orange tribe, Gallesio15 remarks that the amelioration of the various kinds is checked by their continual and almost regular crossing. So it is with numerous other plants. On the other hand, some cultivated plants rarely or never intercross, for instance, the common pea and sweet-pea (Lathyrus odoratus); yet their flowers are certainly adapted for cross fertilisation. The varieties of the tomato and aubergine (Solarium) and the pimenta (Pimento, vulgaris?) are said 16 never to cross, even when growing alongside one another. But it should be observed that these are all exotic plants, and we do not know how they would behave in their native country when visited by the proper insects. With 14 With respect to plants, an admir- able essay on this subject (Die Gesch- lechter-Vertheilung bei den Prlanzen : 1867) has been published by Dr. Hil- debrand, who arrives at the same general conclusions as I have done. Various other treatises have since appeared on the same subject, more especially by Hermann Miiller and Delpino. 15 ' Teoria della Riproduzione Vege- tal,' 1816, p. 12. 18 Verlot, r of rank 5 asserts that horses of three of these races, whilst living a free life, almost always refuse to mingle and cross, and will even attack one another. It has been observed, in a district stocked with heavy Lincolnshire and light Norfolk sheep, that both kinds, though bred together, when turned out, " in a short time separate to a sheep ; " the Lincolnshires drawing off to the rich soil, and the Norfolks to their own dry light soil ; and as long as there is plenty of grass, " the two breeds keep themselves as 4 Rengger, 1 S'augethiere von Para- guay,' s. 336. 4 Sec a memoir by MM. Lherbette and De Quatrefages, in ' Bull. Soc. d'Accliraat.,' torn, viii., July, 1861, p. 312. Chap. XVI. THE CROSSING OF VARIETIES. 81 distinct as rooks and pigeons." In this case different habits of life tend to keep the races distinct. On one of the Faroe islands, not more than half a mile in diameter, the half-wild native black sheep are said not have readily mixed with the imported white sheep. It is a more curious fact that the semi-monstrous ancon sheep of modern origin "have been observed to keep together, separating themselves from the rest of the flock, when put into enclosures with othei sheep."6 With respect to fallow-deer, which live in a semi -domesti- cated condition, Mr. Bennett 7 states that the dark and pale coloured herds, which have long been kept together in the Forest of Dean, in High Meadow Woods, and in the New Forest, have never been known to mingle : the dark-coloured deer, it may be added, are believed to have been first brought by James I. from Norway, on account of their greater hardiness. I imported from the island of Porto Santo two of the feral rabbits, which differ, as described in the fourth chapter, from common rabbits; both proved to be males, and, though they lived during some years in the Zoological Gardens, the superintendent, Mr. Bartlett, in vain endea- voured to make them breed with various tame kinds ; but whether this refusal to breed was due to any change in the instinct, or simply to their extreme wildness, or whether confinement had rendered them sterile, as often occurs, cannot be determined. Whilst matching for the sake of experiment many of the most distinct breeds of pigeons, it frequently appeared to me that the birds, though faithful. to their marriage vow, retained some desire after their own kind. Accordingly I asked Mr. Wicking, who has kept a larger stock of various breeds together than any man in England, whether he thought that they would prefer pairing with their own kind, suppos- ing that there were males and females enough of each ; and he without hesitation answered that he was convinced that 6 For the Norfolk sheep, see Mar- shall's 'Rural Ecommy of Norfolk,' vol. ii. p. 136. See Rev. L. Landt's ' Description of Faroe,' p. 66. For the ancon sheep, see ' Phil. Transact.,' 1813, p. 90. 7 White's < Nat. Hist, of Selbourne,' edited by Bennett, p. 39. With respect to the origin of the dark-coloured deer, see * Some Account of English Deer Parks,' by E. P. Shirley, Esq. 82 CAUSES WHICH CHECK Chap. XVI. this "was the case. It has often "been noticed that the dovecot pigeon seems to have an actual aversion towards the several fancy breeds ; 8 yet all have certainly sprung from a common progenitor. The Rev. W. D. Fox informs me that his flocks of white and common Chinese geese kept distinct. These facts and statements, though some of them are incapable of proof, resting only on the opinion of experienced observers, show that some domestic races are led by different habits of life to keep to a certain extent separate, and that others prefer coupling with their own kind, in the same manner as species in a state of nature, though in a much less degree. With respect to sterility from the crossing of domestic races, 1 know of no well-ascertained case with animals. This fact, seeing the great difference in structure between some breeds of pigeons, fowls, pigs, dogs, &c, is extraordinary, in contrast with the sterility of many closely allied natural species when crossed ; but we shall hereafter attempt to show that it is not so extraordinary as it at first appears. And it may be well here to recall to mind that the amount of external difference between two species is not a safe guide for predicting whether or not they will breed together, — some closely allied species when crossed being utterly sterile, and others which are extremely unlike being moderately fertile. I have said that no case of sterility in crossed races rests on satisfactory evi- dence; but here is one which at first seems trustworthy. Mr. Youatt,9 and a better authority cannot be quoted, states, that formerly in Lancashire crosses were frequently made between longhorn and shorthorn cattle ; the first cross was excellent, but the produce was uncertain ; in the third or fourth generation the cows were bad milkers ; " in addition to which, there was much uncertainty whether the cows would conceive ; and full one-third of the cows among some of these half-breds failed to be in calf."' This at first seems" a good case : but Mr. Wilkinson states,10 that a breed derived from this same cross was actually established in another part of England; and if it had failed in fertility, the fact would surely have been noticed. Moreover, supposing that Mr. Youatt had proved his case, it might be argued that the sterility was wholly due to the two parent-breeds being descended from primordially distinct species. In the case of plants Gartner states that he fertilised thirteen heads (and subsequently nine others) on a dwarf maize bearing 8 « The Dovecote,* by the Rev. E. S. 9 4 Cattle,' p. 202. Dixon, p. 155; Bechstein, 1 Xatur- 10 Mr. J. WilkinsoD, in 'Remarks gesch. Deutschlands,' Band 1795, addressed to Sir J Sebright," 1820, s. 17. p. 38. C!hap. XVI. THE CROSSING OF VARIETIES. 83 yellow seed 11 with pollen of a tall maize having red seed ; and one head alone produced good seed, but only five in number. Though these plants are monoecious, and therefore do not require castration, yet I should have suspected some accident in the manipulation, had not Gartner expressly stated that he had during many years grown these two varieties together, and they did not spontaneously cross ; and this, considering that the plants are monoecious and abound with pollen, and are well known generally to cross freely, seems explicable only on the belief that these two varieties are in some degree mutually infertile. The hybrid plants raised from the above five seeds were intermediate in structure, extremely variable, and perfectly fertile.12 In like manner Prof. Hildebrand13 could not succeed in fertilising the female flowers of a plant bearing brown grains with pollen from a certain kind bearing yellow grains ; although other flowers on the same plant, which were fertilised with their own pollen, yielded good seed. No one, I believe, even suspects that these varieties of maize are distinct species ; but had the hybrids been in the least sterile, no doubt Gartner would at once have so classed them. I may here remark, that with undoubted species there is not necessarily any close relation between the sterility of a first cross and that of the hybrid offspring. Some species can be crossed with facility, but produce utterly sterile hybrids; others can be crossed with extreme difficulty, but the hybrids when produced are moderately fertile. I am not aware, however, of any instance quite like this of the maize, namely, of a first cross made with difficulty, but yielding perfectly fertile hybrids.14 The following case is much more remarkable, and evidently per- plexed Gartner, whose strong wish it was to draw a broad line of distinction between species and varieties. In the genus Verbascum, he made, during eighteen years, a vast number of experiments, and crossed no less than 1085 flowers and counted their seeds. Many of these experiments consisted in crossing white and yellow varieties of both V. lychnitis and V. blattaria with nine other species and their hybrids. That the white and yellow flowered p'ants of these two species are really varieties, no one has doubted ; and Gartner actually raised in the case of both species one variety from the seed of the other. Now in two of his works 15 he distinctly asserts that crosses between similarly-coloured flowers yield more seed than between dissimilarly-coloured ; so that the yellow-flowered variety of either species (and conversely with the white-flowered variety), when crossed with pollen of its own kind, yields more seed than when 11 ' Bastarderzeugung,' s. 87, 169. See also the Table at the end of volume. 12 ' Bastarderzeugung,' s. 87, 577. 13 'Bot. Zeitung,' 1868, p. 327. 14 Mr. Shirreff formerly thought (' Gard. Chron.,' 1858, p. 771) that the offspring from a cross between certain varieties of wheat became sterile in the fourth generation ; but he now admits (' Improvement of the Cereals/ 1873) that thi« was an error. 15 ' Kenntaiss der Befruchtung,' s. 137 ; ' Bastarderzeugung,' s. 92, 181. On raising the two varieties from seed, see s. 307. 84 CAUSES WHICH CHECK Ciiap. XVI crossed with that of the white variety ; and so it is when differently coloured species are crossed. The general results may be seen in the Table at the end of his volume. In one instance he gives 16 the following details; but I must premise that Gartner, to avoid ex- aggerating the degree of sterility in his crosses, always compares the maximum number obtained from a cross with the average number naturally given by the pure mother-plant. The white variety of V. lychnitis, naturally fertilised by its own pollen, gave from an average of twelve capsules ninety-six good seeds in each; whilst twenty flowers fertilised with pollen from the yellow variety of this same species, gave as the maximum only eighty-nine good seeds ; so that we have the proportion of 1000 to 908, according to Gartner's usual scale. I should have thought it possible that so small a difference in fertility might have been accounted for by the evil effects of the necessary castration ; but Gartner shows that the white variety of V. lychnitis, when fertilised first by the white variety of V. blattaria, and then by the yellow variety of this species, yielded seed in the propor- tion of 622 to 438; and in both these cases castration was performed. Now the sterility which results from the crossing of the differently coloured varieties of the same species, is fully as great as that which occurs in many cases when distinct species are crossed. Unfortu- nately Gartner compared the results of the first unions alone, and not the sterility of the two sets of hybrids produced from the white variety of V. lychnitis when fertilised by the white and yellow varieties of V. blattaria, for it is probable that they would have differed in this respect. Mr. J. Scott has given me the results of a series of experiments on Yerbascum, made by him in the Botanic Gardens of Edinburgh.17 He repeated some of Gartner's experiments on distinct species, but obtained only fluctuating results, some confirmatory, the greater number contradictory ; nevertheless these seem hardly sufficient to overthrow the conclusion arrived at by Gartner from experiments tried on a larger scale. Mr. Scott also experimented on the relative fertility of unions between similarly and dissimilarly-coloured varieties of the same species. Thus he fertilised six flowers of the yellow variety of V. lychnitis by its own pollen, and obtained six capsules; and calling, for the sake of comparison, the average number of good seed in each of their capsules one hundred, he found that this same yellow variety, when fertilised by the white variety, yielded from seven capsules an average of ninety-four seed. On the same principle, the white variety of V. lychnitis by its own pollen (from six capsules), and by the pollen of the yellow variety (eight capsules), yielded seed in the proportion of 100 to 82. The yellow variety of V. thapsus by its own pollen (eight capsules), and by that of the white variety (only two capsules), yielded seed in the proportion of 100 to 94. Lastly, the white variety of V. blattaria 16 ' Bastarderzeugung,' s. 216. published in 1 Journ. Asiatic Soc. of 17 The results have since been Bengal,' 1867, p. 145. Ohap. XVI. THE CROSSING OF VARIETIES. 85 by its own pollen (eight capsules), and by that of the yellow variety ( five capsules), yielded seed in the proportion of 100 to 79. So that in every case the unions of similarly-coloured varieties of the same species "were more fertile than the unions of dissimilarly-coloured varieties ; when all the cases are grouped together, the difference of fertility is as ICO to 86. Some additional trials were made, and altogether thirty-six similarly-coloured unions yielded thirty-five good capsules ; whilst thirty-five dissimilarly-coloured unions yielded only twenty-six good capsules. Besides the foregoing experiments, the purple V. phosniceum was crossed by a rose-coloured and a white variety of the same species ; these two varieties were also crossed together, and these several unions yielded less seed than V. phce- niceum by its own pollen. Hence it follows from Mr. Scott's experi- ments, that in the genus Verbascum the similarly and dissimilarly- coloured varieties of the same species behave, when crossed, like closely allied but distinct species.18 This remarkable fact of the sexual affinity of similarly-coloured varieties, as observed by Gartner and Mr. Scott, may not be of very rare occurrence ; for the subject has not been attended to by others. The following case is worth giving, partly to show how difficult it is to avoid error. Dr. Herbert19 has remarked that variously- coloured double varieties of the Hollyhock (Althea rosea) may be raised with certainty by seed from plants growing close together. I have been informed that nurserymen who raise seed for sale do not separate their plants; accordingly I procured seed of eighteen named varieties; of these, eleven varieties produced sixty-two plants all perfectly true to their kind ; and seven produced forty- nine plants, half of which were true and half false. Mr. Masters of 18 The following facts, given by Kolreuter in his ' Dritte Fortsetzung,' ss. 34, 39, appear at tirst sight strongly to confirm Mr. Scott's and Giirtner's statements ; and to a certain limited extent they do so. Kolreuter asserts, from innumerable observations, that insects incessantly carry pollen from one species and variety of Verbascum to another ; and I can confirm this assertion ; yet he found that the white and yellow varieties of Verbas- cum lychnitis often grew wild mingled together : moreover, he cultivated these two varieties in considerable numbers during four years in his garden, and they kept true by seed ; but when he crossed them, they pro- duced flowers of an intermediate tint. Hence it might have been thought that both varieties must have a stronger elective affinity for the pollen of their own variety than for that of the other ; this elective affinity, I may add of each species for its own pollen (Kolreuter, 'Dritte Forts.' s. 39, and Gartner, ' Bastarderz., passim) being a perfectly well-ascertained power. But the force of the fore- going facts is much lessened by Gartner's numerous experiments, for, differently from Kolreuter, he never once got (' Bastarderz.,' s. 307) an intermediate tint when he crossed the yellow and white flowered varieties of Verbascum. So that the fact of the white and yellow varieties keep- ing true* to their colour by seed does not prove that they were not mutual- ly fertilised by the pollen carried by insects from one to the other. 19 ' Amaryllidaceae,' 1837, p. 366. Gartner has made a similar observa- tion. 26 86 CAUSES WHICH CHECK Chap. XVI. Canterbury has given me a more striking case ; he saved seed from a great bed of twenty-four named varieties planted in closely ad- joining rows, and each variety reproduced itself truly with only sometimes a shade of difference in tint. Now in the hollyhock the pollen, which is abundant, is matured and nearly ail shed before the stigma of the same flower is ready to receive it ; 20 and as bees covered with pollen incessantly fly from plant to plant, it would appear that adjoining varieties could not escape being crossed. As, however, this does not occur, it appeared to me probable that the pollen of each variety was prepotent on its own stigma over that of all other varieties, but I have no evidence on this point. Mr. C. Turner of Slough, well known for his success in the cultivation of this plant, informs me that it is the doubleness of the flowers which prevents the bees gaining access to the pollen and stigma; and he finds that it is difficult even to cross them artificially. Whether this explanation will fully account for varieties in close proximity propagating themselves so truly by seed, I do not know. The following cases are worth giving, as they relate to monoecious forms, which do not require, and consequently cannot have been injured by, castration. Girou do Buzareingues crossed what he designates three varieties of gourd,*1 and asserts that their mutual fertilisation is less easy in proportion to the difference which they present. I am aware how imperfectly the forms in this group were until recently known; but Sageret,2,3 who ranked them according to their mutual fertility, considers the three forms above alluded to as varieties, as does a far higher authority, namely, M. Naudin.23 Sageret 24 has observed that certain melons have a greater tendency, whatever the cause may be, to keep true than others ; and B£ Naudin, who has had such immense experience in this group, informs me that he believes that certain varieties intercross more readily than others of the same species; but he has not proved the truth of this conclusion ; the frequent abortion of the pollen near Paris being one great difficulty. Nevertheless, he has grown close together, during seven years, certain forms of Citrullus, which, as they could be artificially crossed with perfect facility and produced fertile offspring, are ranked as varieties; but these forms when not artificially crossed kept true. Many other varieties, on the other hand, in the same group cross with such facility, as M. Naudin repeatedly insists, that without being grown far apart they cannot be kept in the least true. Another case, though somewhat different, may be here given, as 20 Kolreuter first observe J this fact, 1 Mem. de l'Acad. de St. Petersburg,' vol. iii. p. 127. See also G. K. Sprengel, ' Das Entdeckte Geheimniss,' s. 345. 21 Namely, Barbarines, Pastissons, Giraumous: 'Annal. des Sc. Nat.' torn, xxx., 1833, pp. 398 and 405. n 1 Memoire sur les Cucurbitacea?,' 1826, pp. 46, 55. 23 'Annates des Sc. Nat.,' 4th series, torn. vi. M. Naudin considers these forms as undoubtedly varieties of Cucurbit t pepo. 24 ' Mem. Cucurb.,' p. 8. Chai\ XVI. THE CROSSING OF VARIETIES. 8? it is highly remarkable, and is established on excellent evidence. Kolreuter, minutely describes five varieties of the common tobacco,25 which were reciprocally crossed, and the offspring were intermediate in character and as fertile as their parents : from this fact Kolreuter inferred that they are really varieties ; and no one, as far as I can discover, seems to have doubted that such is the case. He also crossed reciprocally these five varieties with N. glutinosa, and they yielded very sterile hybrids; but those raised from the var. perennis, whether used as the father or mother plant, were not so sterile as the hybrids from the four other varieties.26 So that the sexual capacity of this one variety has certainly been in some degree modified, so as to approach in nature that of N. glutinosa?1 These facts with respect to plants show that in some few cases certain varieties have had their sexual powers so far modified, that they cross together less readily and yield less seed than other varieties of the same species. We shall presently see that the sexual functions of most animals and plants are eminently liable to be affected by the conditions of life to which they are exposed ; and hereafter we shall 23 'Zweite Forts.,' s. 53, namely, Nicotiana major vulgaris; (2) peren- nis ; (3) transylvanica ; (4) a sub- var. of the last ; (5) major latifol. fl. alb. 26 Kolreuter was so much struck with this fact that he suspected that a little pollen of N. glutinosa in one of his experiments might have acci- dentally got mingled with that of var. perennis, and thus aided its fer- tilising power. But we now know conclusively from Gartner (' Bastar- derz.,' s. 34, 43) that the pollen of two species never acts conjointly on a third species ; still less will the pollen of. a distinct species, mingled with a plant's own pollen, if the latter be present in sufficient quantity, have any effect. The sole effect of mingling two kinds of pollen is to produce in the same capsule seeds which yield plants, some taking after the one and some after the other parent. 27 Mr. Scott has made some obser- vations on the absolute sterility of a purple and white primrose {Primula vulgaris) when fertilised by pollen from the common primrose (' Journal of Proc. of Linn. Soc.,' vol. viii., 1864, p. 98) ; but these observations require confirmation. I raised a number of purple-flowered long-styled seedlings from seed kindly sent me by Mr. Scott, and, though they were all in some degree sterile, they were much more fertile with pollen taken from the common primrose than with their own pollen. Mr. Scott has likewise described a red equal-styled cowslip (P. veris, ibid. p. 106), which was found by him to be highly sterile when crossed with the common cow- slip ; but this was not the case with several equal - styled red seedlings raised by me from his plant. This variety of the cowslip presents the remarkable peculiarity of combining male organs in every respect like those of the short-styled form, with female organs resembling in function and partly in structure those of the long-styled form ; so that we have the singular anomaly of the two forms combined in the same flower. Hence it is not surprising that these flowers should be spontaneously self- fertile in a high degree. ^8 DOMESTICATION ELIMINATES STERILITY. Chap. XVI. briefly discuss the conjoint "bearing of this fact, and others, on the difference in fertility between crossed varieties and crossed sj^ecies. Domestication eliminates the tendency to Sterility which is general with Species when crossed. This hypothesis was first propounded by Pallas,25 and has been adopted by several authors. I can find hardly any direct facts in its support ; but unfortunately no one has compared, in the case of either animals or plants, the fertility of anciently domesticated varieties, when crossed with a distinct species, with that of the wild parent- species when similarly crossed. Xo one has compared, for instance, the fertility of Gallus lanJciva and of the domesticated fowl, when crossed with a distinct species of Gallus or Phasianus ; and the experiment would in all cases be surrounded by many difficulties. Dureau de la Malle. who has so closely studied classical literature, states 29 that in the time of the Eomans the common mule was produced with more difficulty than at the present day; but whether this statement may be trusted I know not. A much more important, though somewhat dif- ferent, case is given by M. Greenland,30 namely, that plants, known from their intermediate character and sterility to be hybrids between iEgilops and wheat, have perpetuated themselves under culture since 1857, with a rapid but varying increase of fertility in each generation. In the fourth generation the plants, still retaining their intermediate character, had become as fertile as common cultivated wheat. The indirect evidence in favour of the Pallasian doctrine appears to me to be extremely strong. In the earlier chapters I have shown that our various breeds of the dog are descended from several wild species ; and this probably is the case with sheep. There can be no doubt that the Zebu or humped Indian ox belongs to a distinct species from European cattle : the latter, moreover, are descended from two forms, which may be called either species or races. We have good evidence 28 ; Act. Acad. St. Petersburg,' (1st series), p. 61. 1780, part ii. pp. 84, 100. 30 1 Bull. Bot. Soc. de France,' Dec 29 ' Annales des Sc. Nat.' torn. ui. 27th, 1861, torn. viii. p. 612. Chap. XVI. INCREASED FERTILITY FROM DOMESTICATION. 89 that our domesticated pigs belong to at least two specific types, S. scrofa and indicus. Now a widely extended analogy leads to the belief that if these several allied species, when first reclaimed, had been crossed, the}r would have exhibited, both in their first unions and in their hybrid offspring, some degree of sterility. Nevertheless, the several domesticated races descended from them are now all, as far as can be ascertained, perfectly fertile together. If this reasoning be trustworthy, -and it is apparently sound, we must admit the Pallas i an doctrine that long-continued domestication tends to eliminate that sterility which is natural to species when crossed in their aboriginal state. On increased Fertility from Domestication and Cultivation. Increased fertility from domestication, without any refer- ence to crossing, may be here briefly considered. This subject bears indirectly on two or three points connected with the modification of organic beings. As Buffon long ago re- marked,31 domestic animals breed oftener in the year and produce more young at a birth than wild animals of the same species ; they, also, sometimes breed at an earlier age. The case would hardly have deserved further notice, had not some authors lately attempted to show that fertility increases and decreases in an inverse ratio with the amount of food. This strange doctrine has apparently arisen from individual animals when supplied with an inordinate quantity of food, and from plants of many kinds when grown on excessively rich soil, as on a dunghill, becoming sterile : but to this latter point I shall have occasion presently to return. With hardby an exception, our domesticated animals, which have been long habituated to a regular and copious supply of food, without the labour of searching for it, are more fertile than the corresponding wild animals. It is notorious how fre- quently cats and dogs breed, and how many young they produce at a birth. The wild rabbit is said generally to 31 Quoted by Isid. Geoffroy St. the present subject has appeared in Hilaire, ' Hist. Naturelle Generale,' Mr. Herbert Spencer's ' Principles of torn. iii. p. 476. Since this MS. has Biology,' vol. ii., 1867, p. 457 ct scq. been sent to press a full discussion on 90 INCREASED FERTILITY Chap. XVI. breed four times yearly, and to produce each time at most six young ; the tame rabbit breeds six or seven times yearly, producing each time from four to eleven young ; and Mr. Harrison Weir tells me of a case of eighteen young: having been produced at a birth, all of which survived. The ferret, though generally so closely confined, is more prolific than its supposed wild prototype. The wild sow is remarkably prolific ; she often breeds twice in the year, and bears from four to eight and sometimes even twelve young ; but the domestic sow regularly breeds twice a year, and would breed oftener if permitted ; and a sow that produces less than eight at a birth " is worth little, and the sooner she is fattened for the butcher the better." The amount of food affects the fertility of the same individual : thus sheep, which on moun- tains never produce more than one lamb at a birth, when brought down to lowland pastures frequently bear twins. This difference apparently is not due to the cold of the higher land, for s-heep and other domestic animals are said to be ex- tremely prolific in Lapland. Hard living, also, retards the period at which animals conceive ; for it has been found dis- advantageous in the northern islands of Scotland to allow cows to bear calves before they are four years old.32 Birds offer still better evidence of increased fertility from domesti- cation : the hen of the wild GaUus hankiva lays from six to ten eggs, a number which would be thought nothing of with the domestic hen. The wild duck lays from five to ten eggs ; the tame one in the course of the year from eighty to one hundred. The wild grey -lag goose lays from five to eight eggs; the "tame from thirteen to eighteen, and she lays a second time ; as Mr. Dixon has remarked, " high-feeding, care, and moderate warmth induce a habit of proli- ficacy which becomes in some measure hereditary." Whether the semi-domesticated dovecot pigeon is more fertile than the wild rock-pigeon, C. livia, I know not; but the more thoroughly domesti- 32 For cats and dogs, &c., sec Bel- lingeri, in ' Annal. des Sc. Nat.,' 2nd series, Zoolog.. torn. xii. p. 155. For ferrets, Bechstein, ' Naturgeschichte Deutschlands,' Band i., 1801, 's. 783, 795. For rabbits, ditto, s. 1123, 1131 ; and Bronn's 4 Geschichte der Natur.,' B. ii. s. 99. For mountain sheep, ditto, s. 102. For the fertility of the wild sow, see Bechstein's ' Naturgesch. Deutschlands,' B. i., 1801, s. 534; for the domestic pig, Sidney's edit, of Youatt on the Pig, 1830, p. 62. With respect to Lapland, see Acerbi's 4 Travels to the North Cape,' Eng. translat., vol. ii. p. 222. About the Highland cows, see Hogg on Sheep, p. 263. Chap. XVI. FROM DOMESTICATION. 91 cated breeds are nearly twice as fertile as dovecots: the latter, however, when caged and highly fed, become equally fertile with house pigeons. 1 hear from Judge Caton that the wild turkey in the United States does not breed when a year old, as the domesti- cated turkeys there invariably do. The peahen alone of domesti- cated birds is rather more fertile, according to some accounts, when wild in its native Indian home, than in Europe when exposed to our much colder climate.33 With respect to plants, no one would expect wheat to tiller more, and each ear to produce more grain, in poor than in rich soil ; or to get in poor soil a heavy crop of peas or beans. Seeds vary so much in number that it is difficult to estimate them ; but on comparing beds of carrots in a nursery garden with wild plants, the former seemed to produce about twice as much seed. Cultivated cabbages yielded thrice as many pods by measure as wild cabbages from the rocks of South Wales. The excess of berries produced by the culti- vated asparagus in comparison with the wild plant is enormous. No doubt many highly cultivated plants, such as pears, pineapples, bananas, sugar-cane, &c, are nearly or quite sterile ; and I am inclined to attribute this sterility to excess of food and to other unnatural conditions ; but to this subject I shall recur. In some cases, as with the pig, rabbit, &c, and with those plants which are valued for their seed, the direct selection of the more fertile individuals has probably much increased their fertility; and in all cases this may have occurred in- directly, from the better chance of some of the numerous offspring from the more fertile individuals having been pre- served. But with cats, ferrets, and dogs, and with plants like carrots, cabbages, and asparagus, which are not valued for their prolificacy, selection can have played only a sub- ordinate part ; and their increased fertility must be attributed to the more favourable conditions of life under which they have long existed. 33 For the eggs of G alius bank iv t, Pigeons,' p. 158. With respect to see Blyth, in 'Annals and Mag. of peacocks, according to Temminck Nat. Hist.,' 2nd series, vol. i., 1848, (' Hist. Nat. Gen. des Pigeons,' &c, p. 456. For wild and tame ducks, 1813, torn. ii. p. 41), the lien lays in Macgillivray, 'British Birds,' vol. v. India even as many as twenty eggs ; p. 37 ; and ' Die Enten,' s. 87. For hut according to Jerdon and another wild £eese, L. Llovd, ' Scandinavian writer (quoted in Tegetmeier's Adventures,' vol. ii. 1854, P. 413; 'Poultry Book,' 18(36, pp. 280, 28-'), and for tame geese, ' Ornamental she there lays only from four to nine Poultry,' by Rev. E. S. Dixon, p. 139. or ten eggs: in England she is said, On the breeding of Pigeons, Pistor, in the ' Poultry Book.' to lay five or * Das Ganze der Taubenzucht,' 1831, six, but another writer says from *. 46 ; and Boitard and Corbie ' Les eight to twelve eggs. . 92 GOOD FROM CROSSING. Chap. XVII. CHAPTER XVII. ON THE GOOD EFFECTS OF CROSSING, AND ON THE EVIL EFFECTS OF CLOSE INTERBREEDING. DEFINITION OF CLOSE INTERBREEDING — AUGMENTATION OF MORBID TEN- DENCIES— GENERAL EVIDENCE OF THE GOOD EFFECTS DERIVED FROM CROSSING, AND ON THE EVIL EFFECTS FROM CLOSE INTERBREEDING CATTLE, CLOSELY INTERBRED; HALF-WILD CATTLE LONG KEPT IN THE SAME PARKS SHEEP — FALLOW-DEER — DOGS, RABBITS, PIGS — MAN, ORIGIN OF HIS ABHORRENCE OF INCESTUOUS MARRIAGES — FOWLS PIGEONS — HIVE- BEES PLANTS, GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS ON THE BENEFITS DERIVED FROM CROSSING — MELONS, FRUIT-TREES, PEAS, CABBAGES, WHEAT, AND FOREST- TREES — ON THE INCREASED SIZE OF HYBRID PLANTS, NOT EXCLUSIVELY DUE TO THEIR STERILITY — ON CERTAIN PLANTS WHICH EITHER NOR- MALLY OR ABNORMALLY ARE SELF-IMIOTEXT, BUT ARE FERTILE, BOTH ON THE MALE AND FEMALE SIDE, WHEN CROSSED WITH DISTINCT INDI- VIDUALS EITHER OF THE SAME OR ANOTHER SPECIES — CONCLUSION. The gain in constitutional vigour, derived from an occasional cross between individuals of the same variety, but belonging to distinct families, or between distinct varieties, has not been so largely or so frequently discussed, as have the evil effects of too close interbreeding. But the former point is the more important of the two, inasmuch as the evidence is more decisive. The evil results from close interbreeding are difficult to detect, for they accumulate slowly, and differ much in degree with different species ; whiLt the good effects which almost invariably follow a cross are from the first manifest. It should, however, be clearly understood that the advantage of close interbreeding, as far as the retention of character is concerned, is indisputable, and often outweighs the evil of a slight loss of constitutional vigour. In relation to the subject of domestication, the whole question is of some importance, as too close interbreeding interferes with the improvement of old races. It is important as indirectly bearing on Hybridism ; and possibly on the extinction of species, when any form has become so rare that only a few individuals remain within a confined area. It bears in an Chap. XVII. EVIL FROM INTERBREEDING. 93 important manner on the influence of free intercrossing, in obliterating individual differences, and thus giving uniformity of character to the individuals of the same race or species ; for if additional vigour and fertility he thus gained, the crossed offspring will multiply and prevail, and the ultimate result will be far greater than otherwise would have occurred. Lastly, the question is of high interest, as bearing on mankind. I shall therefore discuss this subject at full length. As the facts which prove the evil effects of close interbreeding are more copious, though less decisive, than those on the good effects of crossing, I shall, under each group of beings, begin with the former. There is no difficulty in defining what is meant by a cross ; but this is by no means easy in regard to " breeding in and in " or " too close interbreeding," because, as we shall see, different species of animals are differently affected by the same degree of interbreeding. The pairing of a father and daughter, or mother and son, or brothers and sisters, if carried on during several generations, is the closest possible form of interbreeding. But some good judges, for instance Sir J. Sebright, believe that the pairing of a brother and sister is much closer than that of parents and children ; for when the father is matched with his daughter he crosses, as is said, with only half his own blood. The consequences of close interbreeding carried on for too long a time, are, as is generally believed, loss of size, constitutional vigour, and fertility, sometimes accompanied by a tendency to malformation. Manifest evil does not usually follow from pairing the nearest relations for two, three, or even four generations ; but several causes interfere with our detecting the evil — such as the deterioration being very gradual, and the difficulty of dis- tinguishing between such direct evil and the inevitable augmentation of any morbid tendencies which may be latent or apparent in the related parents. On the other hand, the benefit from a cross, even when there has not been any very close interbreeding, is almost invariably at once conspicuous. There is good reason to believe, and this was the opinion of that most experienced observer Sir J. Sebright,1 that the evil 1 'The Art of Improving the Breed, &c,' 1809, p. 16. 94 GOOD FKOM ( HOcBING. ■ Chap. XVII. effects of close interbreeding may be checked or quite pre- vented by the related individuals being separated for a few- generations and exposed to different conditions of life. This conclusion is now held by many breeders ; for instance Mr. Carr 2 remarks, it is a well-known " fact that a change of soil and climate effects perhaps almost as great a change in the constitution as would result from an infusion of fresh blood." I hope to show in a future work that consanguinity by itself counts for nothing, but acts solely from related organisms gene- rally having a similar constitution, and having been exposed in most cases to similar conditions. That any evil directly follows from the closest interbreeding has been denied by many persons ; but rarely by any practical breeder ; and never, as far as I know, by one who has largely bred animals which propagate their kind quickly. Many physiologists attribute the evil exclusively to the combination and consequent increase of morbid tendencies common to both parents ; and that this is an active source of mischief there can be no doubt. It is unfortunately too notorious that men and various domestic animals endowed with a wretched constitution, and with a strong hereditary disposition to disease, if not actually ill, are fully capable of procreating their kind. Close interbreeding, on the other hand, often induces sterility ; and this indicates something quite distinct from the augmentation of morbid tendencies common to both parents. The evidence immediately to be given convinces me that it is a great law of nature, that all organic beings profit from an occasional cross with individuals not closely related to them in blood ; and that, on the other hand, long-continued close interbreeding is injurious. Various general considerations have had much influence in leading me to this conclusion ; but the reader will probably rely more on special facts and opinions. The authority of experienced observers, even when they do not advance the grounds of their belief, is of some little value. Now almost all men wdio have bred many kinds of animals and have written on the subject, such as Sir J. Sebright, Andrew ' ' The History of the Rise and Progress of the Killerby, &c. Herds,' p. 41. Chap. XVII. EVIL FROM INTERBREEDING. 95 Knight, &c.,3 have expressed the strongest conviction on the impossibility of long-continued close interbreeding. Those who have compiled works on agriculture, and have associated much with breeders, such as the sagacious Youatt, Low, &c., have strongly declared their opinion to the same effect. Prosper Lucas, trusting largely to French authorities, has come to a similar conclusion. The distinguished German agriculturist Hermann von Kathusius, who has written the most able treatise on this subject which I have met with, concurs ; and as I shall have to quote from this treatise, I may state that Xathusius is not only intimately acquainted with works on agriculture in all languages, and knows the pedigrees of our British breeds better than most Englishmen, but has imported many of our improved animals, and is him- self an experienced breeder. Evidence of the evil effects of close interbreeding can most readily be acquired in the case of animals, such as fowls, pigeons, &c, which propagate quickly, and, from being kept in the same place, are exposed to the same conditions. Now I have inquired of very many breeders of these birds, and I have hitherto not met with a single man who was not thorough^ convinced that an occasional cross with another strain of the same sub-variety was absolutely necessary. Most breeders of highly improved or fancy birds value their own strain, and are most unwilling, at the risk, in their opinion, of deterioration, to make a cross. The purchase of a first-rate bird of another strain is expensive, and exchanges are troublesome ; yet all breeders, as far as I can hear, ex- cepting those who keep large stocks at different places for the sake of crossing, are driven after a time to take this step. Another general consideration which has had great influence on my mind is, that with all hermaphrodite animals and plants, which it might have been thought would have per- petually fertilised themselves and been thus subjected for long ages to the closest interbreeding, there is not a single species, as far as I can discover, in which the structure ensures self- fertilisation. On the contrary, there are in a multitude of 3 For Andrew Knight, see A. Walker, on 1 Intermarriage,' 1838, p. 227. Sir J. Sebright'* Treatise has just been quoted. 96 GOOD FROM CROSSING. Chap. XVII. cases, as briefly stated in the fifteenth chapter, manifest adaptations which favour or inevitably lead to an occasional cross between one hermaphrodite and another of the same species ; and these adaptive structures are utterly purposeless, as far as we can see, for any other end. With Cattle there can be no doubt that extremely close inter- breeding may be long carried on advantageously with respect to external characters, and with no manifest evil as far as constitution is concerned. The case of Bake well's Longhorns, which were closely interbred for a long period, has often been quoted; yet Youatt says4 the breed "had acquired a delicacy of constitution inconsistent with common management," and " the propagation of the species was not always certain." But the Shorthorns offer the most striking case of close interbreeding ; for instance, the famous bull Favourite (who was himself the offspring of a half-brother and sister from Foljambe) was matched with his own daughter, grand- daughter, and great-granddaughter ; so that the produce of this last union, or the great-great-granddaughter, had 15-16ths, or 93'75 per cent, of the blood of Favourite in her veins. This cow was matched with the bull Wellington, having 62-5 per cent, of Favourite blood in his veins, and produced Clarissa ; Clarissa was matched with the bull Lancaster, having 68*75 of the same blood, and she yielded valuable offspring.5 Nevertheless Collings, who reared these animals, and was a strong advocate for close breeding, once crossed his stock with a Galloway, and the cows from this cross realised the highest prices. Bates's herd was esteemed the most celebrated in the world. For thirteen years he bred most closely in and in ; but during the next seventeen years, though he had the most exalted notion of the value of his own stock, he thrice infused fresh blood into his herd : it is said that he did this, not to improve the form of his animals, but on account of their lessened fertility. Mr. Bates's own view, as given by a celebrated breeder,6 4 ' Cattle,' p. 199. 5 I give this on the authority of Nathusius, ' Ueber Shorthorn Rind- vieh,' 1857, s. 71 {see also ' Gardener's Chronicle,' 1860, p. 270). But Mr. J. Storer, a large breeder of cattle, informs me that the parentage of Clarissa is not well authenticated. In the first vol. of the ' Herd Book,' she was entered as having six descents from Favourite, " which was a palpa- ble mistake," and in all subsequent editions she was spcsen of as having only four descents.. Mr. Storer doubts even about the four, as no names of the dams are given. Moreover, Cla- rissa bore " only two bulls and one heifer, and in the next generation her progeny became extinct." Analogous cases ot close interbreeding are given in a pamphlet published by Mr. C. Macknight and Dr. H. Madden, 1 On the True Principles of Breeding ; ' Melbourne, Australia, 18G5. 6 Mr. Willoughby Wood, in 'Gar- dener's Chronicle,' 1855, p. 411 ; and 1860, p. 270. See the very clear tables and pedigrees given in Nathu- sius' ' Rindvieh,' s. 72-77. Chap. XVII. EVIL FROM INTERBREEDING. 97 was, that " to breed in-and-in from a bad stock was ruin and de- vastation; yet that the practice may be safely followed within certain limits when the parents so related are descended from first- rate animals." We thus see that there has been much close inter- breeding with Shorthorns ; but Nathusius, after the most careful study of their pedigrees, says that he can find no instance of a breeder who has strictly followed this practice during his whole life. From this study and his own experience, he concludes that close interbreeding is necessary to ennoble the stock ; but that in effecting this the greatest care is necessary, on account of the ten- dency to infertility and weakness. It may be added, that another high authority 7 asserts that many more calves are born cripples from Shorthorns than from other and less closely interbred races of cattle. Although by carefully selecting the best animals (as Nature effectually does by the law of battle) close interbreeding may be long carried on with cattle, yet the good effects of a cross between almost any two breeds is at once shown by the greater size and vigour of the offspring; as Mr. Spooner writes to me, " crossing distinct breeds certainly improves cattle for the butcher." Such crossed animals are of course of no value to the breeder ; but they have been raised during many years in several parts of England to be slaughtered ; 8 and their merit is now so fully recognised, that at fat-cattle shows a separate class has been formed for their re- ception. The best fat ox at the great show at Islington in 1862 was a crossed animal. The half-wild cattle, which have been kept in British parks pro- bably for 400 or 500 years, or even for a longer period, have been advanced by Culley and others as a case of long -continued inter- breeding within the limits of the same herd without any consequent injury. With respect to the cattle at Chillingham, the late Lord Tankerville owned that they were bad breeders.9 The agent, Mr. Hardy, estimates (in a letter to me, dated May, 1861) that in the herd of about fifty the average number annually slaughtered, killed by fighting, and dying, is about ten, or one in five. As the herd is kept up to nearly the same average number, the annual rate of increase must be likewise about one in five. The bulls, I may add, engage in furious battles, of which battles the present Lord Tan- kerville has given me a graphic description, so that there will always be rigorous selection of the most vigorous males. I pro- cured in 1855 from Mr. D. Gardner, agent to the Duke of Hamilton, 7 Mr. Wright, ' Journal of Royal Agricult. Soc.,' vol. vii., 1846, p. 204. Mr. J. Downing (a successful breeder of Shorthorns in Ireland) informs me that the raisers of the great families of Shorthorns carefully conceal their sterility and want of constitution. He adds that Mr. Bates, after he had bred his herd in-and-in for some yeais, "lost in one season twenty -eight calves solely from want of constitu- tion." 8 Youatt on Cattle, p. 202. 9 ' Report British Assoc., Zoolog. Sect.,' 1838. 98 GOOD Fl.OM CROSSING. Cuap. XVII the following account of the wild cattle kept in the Duke's park in Lanarkshire, which is about 200 acres in extent. The number of cattle varies from sixty-five to eighty ; and the number annually killed (I presume by all causes) is from eight to ten ; so that tlu annual rate of increase can hardly be more than one in six. Now in South America, where the herds are half-wild, and therefore offer a nearly fair standard of comparison, according to Azara the natural increase of the cattle on an estancia is from one-third to one-fourth of the total number, or one in between three and four ■ and this, no doubt, applies exclusively to adult animals fit for con- sumption. Hence the half-wild British cattle which have long interbred within the limits of the same herd are relatively far less fertile. Although in an unenclosed country like Paraguay there must be some crossing between the different herds, yet even there the inhabitants believe that the occasional introduction of animals from distant localities is necessary to prevent " degeneration in size and diminution of fertility." 10 The decrease in size from ancient times in the Chillingham and Hamilton cattle must have been pro- digious, for Professor Rutimeyer has shown that they are almost certainly the descendants of the gigantic Bos primiyenius. No doubt this decrease in size may be largely attributed to less favour- able conditions of life ; yet animals roaming over large parks, and fed during severe winters, can hardly be considered as placed under very unfavourable conditions. With Siie p there has often been long-continued interbreeding within the limits of the same flock; but whether the nearest rela- tions have been matched so frequently as in the case of Shorthorn cattle, I do not know. The Messrs. Brown during fifty years have never infused fresh blood into their excellent flock of Leicesters. Since 1810 Mr. Barforci has acted on the same principle with the Foscote flock. He asserts that half a century of experience has convinced him that when two nearly related animals are quite sound m constitution, in-and-in breeding does not induce dege- neracy ; but he adds that he " does not pride himself on breeding from the nearest affinities." In France the Naz flock has been bred for sixty years without the introduction of a single strange ram.11 Nevertheless, most great breeders of sheep have protested against close interbreeding prolonged for too great a length of time.12 The most celebrated of recent breeders, Jonas Webb, kept five separate families to work on, thus " retaining the requisite distance of rela- tionship between the sexes;"13 and what is probably of greater importance, the separate flocks will have been exposed to somewhat different conditions. 1# Azara, ' Quadruples du Para- guay,' torn. ii. pp. 354, 368. 11 For the case of the Messrs. Brown, see 'Gard. Chronicle,' 1855, p. 26. For the Foscote flock, ' Gard. Chron.,' 1860, p. 416. For the Naz flock, 1 Bull, de la Sue. d'Acclimat.,' 1860, p. 477. 12 Nathusius, ' Rindvieh,' s. 65 ; Youatt on Sheep, p. 495. 13 'Gard. Chronicle,' 1861, p. 631. Chap. XVII. EVIL FROM INTERBREEDING. 99 Although by the aid of careful selection the near interbreeding of sheep may "be long continued without any manifest evil, yet it has often been the practice with farmers to cross distinct breeds to obtain animals for the butcher, which plainly shows that good of some kind is derived from this practice. We have excellent evi- dence on this head from Mr. S. Druce,14 who gives in detail the comparative numbers of four pure breeds and of a cross-breed which can be supported on the same ground, and he gives their pro- duce in fleece and carcase. A high authority, Mr. Pusey, sums up the result in money value during an equal length of time, namely (neglecting shillings), for Cotswolds 248?., for Leicesters 223/., for Southdowns 204/., for Hampshire Downs 264/., and for the cross- bred 293/. A former celebrated breeder, Lord Somerville, states that his half-breeds from Eyelands and Spanish sheep were larger animals than either the pure Eyelands or pure Spanish sheep. Mr. Spooner concludes his excellent Essay on Crossing by asserting that there is a pecuniary advantage in judicious cross-breeding, especially when the male is larger than the female.15 As some of our British parks are ancient, it occurred to me that there must have been long-continued close interbreeding with the fallow-deer (Cervus da ma) kept in them ; but on inquiry I find that it is a common practice to infuse new blood by procuring bucks from other parks. Mr. Shirley,16 who has carefully studied the management of deer, admits that in some parks there has been no admixture of foreign blood from a time beyond the memory of man. But he concludes " that in the end the constant breeding in-and-in " is sure to tell to the disadvantage of the whole herd, though it " may take a very long time to prove it; moreover, when we find, " as is very constantly the case, that the introduction of fresh blood " has been of the very greatest use to deer, both by improving their " size and appearance, and particularly by being of service in re- " moving the taint of 'rickback/ if not of other diseases, to which " deer are sometimes subject when the blood has not been changed, " there can, I think, be no doubt but that a judicious cross with a " good stock is of the greatest consequence, and is indeed essential, " sooner or later, to the prosperity of every well-ordered park." Mr. Meynell's famous foxhounds have been adduced, as showing that no ill effects follow from close interbreeding; and Sir J. Sebright ascertained from him that he frequently bred from father and daughter, mother and son, and sometimes even from brothers and sisters. With greyhounds also there has been much close interbreeding, but the best breeders agree that it may be carried 14 4 Journal R. Agricuit. Soc.,' vol. xiv., 1853, p. 212. 15 Lord Somerville, ' Facts on Sheep and Husbandry,' p. 6. Mr. Spooner, in 1 Journal of Royal Agri- cult. Soc. of England,' vol. xx. part ii. See also an excellent paper on the same subjectin ' Gard. Chronicle,' 1860, p. 321, by Mr. Charles Howard. 16 ' Some Account of English Deei Parks,' by Evelyn P. Shirley, 1867. ICO GOOD FROM CROSSING. Chap. XVII. too far.17 But Sir J. Sebright, declares,18 that by breeding in-and-in, by which he means matching brothers and sisters, he has actually seen the offspring of strong spaniels degenerate into weak and diminutive lapdogs. The Eev. W. D. Fox has communicated to me the case of a small lot of bloodhounds, long kept in the same family, which had become very bad breeders, and nearly all had a bony enlargement in the tail. A single cross with a distinct strain of bloodhounds restored their fertility, and drove away the tendency to malformation in the tail. I have heard the particulars of an- other case with bloodhounds, in which the female had to be held to the male. Considering how rapid is the natural increase of the dog, it is difficult to understand the large price of all highly im- proved breeds, which almost implies long-continued close inter- breeding, except on the belief that this process lessens fertility and increases liability to distemper and other diseases. A high authority, Mr. Scrope, attributes the rarity and deterioration in size of the Scotch deerhound (the few individuals formerly existing throughout the country being all related) in large part to close interbreeding. With all highly-bred animals there is more or less difficulty in getting them to procreate quickly, and all suffer much from delicacy of constitution. A great judge of rabbits19 says, "the long-eared does are often too highly bred or forced in their youth to be of much value as breeders, often turning out barren or bad mothers." They often desert their young, so that it is necessary to have nurse-rabbits, but I do not pretend to attribute all these evil results to close interbreeding.20 With respect to Figs there is more unanimity amongst breeders on the evil effects of close interbreeding than, perhaps, with any other large animal. Mr. Druce, a great and successful breeder of the Improved Oxfordshires (a crossed race), writes, "without a change of boars of a different tribe, but of the same breed, constitu- tion cannot be preserved." Mr. Fisher Hobbs, the raiser of the 17 Stonehenge, ' The Dog,' 1867, pp. 175-188. 18 'The Ait of Improving the Breed,' &c, p. 13. With respect to Scotch deerhounds, see Scrope's 'Art of Deer Stalking,' pp. 350-353. 19 ' Cottage Gardener,' 1861, p. 327. 20 Mr. Huth gives (' The Marriage of Near Kin,' 1875, p. 302) from the ' Bulletin de l'Acad. R. de Med. do Belgique' (vol. ix., 1866, pp. 287, 305), several statements made by a M. Legrain with respect to crossing brother and sister rabbits for five or six successive generations with no consequent evil results. I was so much surprised at this account, and at M. Legrain's invariable success in his experiments, that I wrote to a distinguished naturalist in Belgium to inquire whether M. Legrain was a trustworthy observer. In answer, I have heard that, as doubts were ex- pressed about the authenticity of these experiments, a commission of inquiry was appointed, and that at a suc- ceeding meeting of the Society (' Bull, de l'Acad. R. de Med. de Beigique,' 1867, 3rd series, Tome 1, No. 1 to 5), Dr. Crocq reported " qu'il etait materiellement impossible que M. Le- grain ait fait les experiences qu'il annonce." To this public accusation no satisfactory answer was made. Chap. XVII. EVIL FROM INTERBEEEDLNU. celebrated Improved Essex breed, divided his stock into three separate families, by which means he maintained the breed for more than twenty years, "by judicious selection from the three distinct families"21 Lord Western was the first importer of a Neapolitan boar and sow. "From this pair he bred in-and-in, until the breed was in danger of becoming extinct, a sure result (as Mr. Sidney remarks) of in-and-in breeding." Lord Western then crossed his Neapolitan pigs with the old Essex, and made the first great step towards the Improved Essex breed. Here is a more interesting case. Mr. J. Wright, well known as a breeder, crossed22 the same boar with the daughter, granddaughter, and great-grand- daughter, and so on for seven generations. The result was, that in many instances the offspring failed to breed; in others they produced few that lived; and of the latter many were idiotic, without sense, even to suck, and when attempting to move could not walk straight. Now it deserves especial notice, that the two last sows produced by this long course of interbreeding were sent to other boars, and they bore several litters of healthy pigs. The best sow in external appearance produced during the whole seven generations was one in the last stage of descent; but the litter consisted of this one sow. She would not breed to her sire, yet bred at the first trial to a stranger in blood. So that, in Mr. Wright's case, long-continued and extremely close interbreeding did not affect the external form or merit of the young; but with many of them the general constitution and mental powers, and especially the reproductive functions, were seriously affected. Nathusius gives23 an analogous and even more striking case: he imported from England a pregnant sow of the large Yorkshire breed, and bred the product closely in-and-in for three generations : the result was unfavourable, as the young were weak in constitution, with impaired fertility. One of the latest sows, which he esteemed a good animal, produced, when paired with her own uncle (who was known to be productive with sows of other breeds), a litter of six, and a second time a litter of only five weak young pigs. He then paired this sow with a boar of a small black breed, which he had likewise imported from England ; this boar, when matched with sows of his own breed, produced from seven to nine young. Now, the sow of the large breed, which was so unproductive when paired with her own uncle, yielded to the small black boar, in the first litter twenty-one, and in the second litter eighteen young pigs ; so that in one year she produced thirty-nine fine young animals ! As in the case of several other animals already mentioned, even 21 Sidney's edit, of 1 Youatt on the Pig, ' 1860, p. 30 ; p. 33, quotation from Mr. Druce ; p. 29, on Lord Western's case. 22 ' Journal of Royal Agricult. Soc. of England,' 1846, vol. vii. p. 205. 23 'Ueber Rindvieh,' &c, s. 78. Col. Le Couteur, who has done so much for the agriculture of Jersey, writes to me that from possessing a fine breed of pigs he bred them very closely, twice pairing brothers and sisters, but nearly all the young had fits and died suddenly. 102 GOOD FROM CROSSING. Chap. XVII. when no injury is perceptible from moderately close interbreeding, yet, to quote the words of Mr. Coate (who five times won the annual gold medal of the Smithfield Club Show for the best pen of pigs), " Crosses answer well for profit to the farmer, as you get more " constitution and quicker growth ; but for me, who sell a great " number of pigs for breeding purposes, I find it will not do, as " it requires many years to get anything like purity of blood " again."21 Almost all the animals as yet mentioned are gregarious, and the males must frequently pair with their own daughters, for they expel the young males as well as all intruders, until forced by old age and loss of strength to yield to some stronger male. It is therefore not improbable that gregarious animals may have been rendered less susceptible than non-social species to the evil consequences of close interbreeding, so that they may be enabled to live in herds without injury to their offspring. Unfortunately we do not know whether an animal like the cat, which is not gregarious, would suffer from close interbreeding in a greater degree than our other domesticated animals. But the pig is not, as far as I can discover, strictly gregarious, and we have seen that it appears eminently liable to the evil effects of close interbreeding. Mr. Huth, in the case of the pig, attributes (p. 285) these effects to their having been " cultivated most for their fat," or to the selected individuals having had a weak constitution ; but we must remember that it is great breeders who have brought forward the above cases, and who are far more familiar than ordinary men can be, with the causes which are likely to interfere with the fertility of their animals. The effects of close interbreeding in the case of man is a difficult subject, on which I will say but little. It has been discussed by various authors under many points of view.25 24 Sidney en the Pig, p. 36. See also note, p. 34-. Ah) Richardson on the Pig, 18+7, p. 26. 25 Dr. Dally has published an excel- lent arti.de (translated in the ' Anthro- polog. Review,' May, 1864-, p. 0.">), criticising all writers who l ave main- tained that evil follows from con- sanguineous marriages. No doubt on this side of the question many advo- cates have injured their cause by in- accuracies : thus it has been stated (Devay, ' Du Danger des Manages,' &c, 1862, p. 141) that the marriages of cousins have been prohibited by the legislature of Ohio; but I have been assured, in answer to inquiries made in the United States, that this statement is a mere fable. Chap. XVII. EVIL FROM INTERBREEDING. 103 Mr. Tylor 20 has shown that with widely different races in the most distant quarters of the world, marriages between relations — even between distant relations — have been strictly prohibited. There are, however, many exceptions to the rule, which are fully given by Mr. Huth.27. It is a curious problem how these prohibitions arose during early and barbarous times. Mr. Tylor is inclined to attribute them to the evil effects of consanguineous marriages having been ob- served ; and he ingeniously attempts to explain some apparent anomalies in the prohibition not extending equally to the relations on the male and female side. He admits, however, that other causes, such as the extension of friendly alliances, may have come into play. Mr. W. Adam, on the other hand, concludes that related marriages are prohibited and viewed with repugnance, from the confusion which would thus arise in the descent of property, and from other still more recondite reasons. But I cannot accept these views, seeing that incest is held in abhorrence by savages such as those of Australia and South America,23 who have no property to bequeath, or fine moral feelings to confuse, and who are not likely to reflect on distant evils to their progeny. According to Mr. Huth the feeling is the indirect result of exogamy, inasmuch as when this practice ceased in any tribe and it became endogamous, so that marriages were strictly confined to the same tribe, it is not unlikely that a vestige of the former practice would still be retained, so that closely-related marriages would be prohibited. With respect to exogamy itself Mr. MacLennan believes that it arose from a scarcity of women, owing to female infanticide, aided perhaps by other causes. It has been clearly shown by Mr. Huth that there is no 26 See his interesting work on the ' Early History of Man,' 1865, chap. x. 27 4 The Marriage of Near Kin,' 1875. The evidence given by Mr. Huth would, I think, have been even more valuable than it is on this and some other points, if he had referred solely to the works of men who had jong resided in each country referred to, and who showed that they possessed judgment and caution. See also Mr. W. Adam, ' On Consanguinity in Mar- riage ' in the ' Fortnightly Review,' 1865, p. 710. Also Hofacker, ' Ueber die Eigenschaften,' &c., 18:'8. 28 Sir G. Grey's ' Journal of Expe- ditions into Australia,' vol. ii. p. 243 ; and Dobrizhoffer, 'On the Ablpones of South America.' 104 GOOD FROM CROSSING. Chap. XVII. instinctive feeling in man against incest any more than in gregarious animals. We know also how readily any prejudice or feeling may rise to abhorrence, as shown by Hindus in regard to objects causing defilement. Although there seems to be no strong inherited feeling in mankind against incest, it seems possible that men during primeval times may have been more excited by strange females than by those with whom they habitually lived ; in the same manner as accord- ing to Mr. Cupples,29 male deerhounds are inclined towards strange females, while the females prefer dogs with whom they have associated. If any such feeling formerly existed in man, this would have led to a preference for marriages beyond the nearest kin, and might have been strengthened by the offspring of such marriages surviving in greater numbers, as analogy would lead us to believe would have occurred. "Whether consanguineous marriages, sucli as are permitted in civilised nations, and which would not be considered as close interbreeding in the case of our domesticated animals, cause any injury will never be known with certainty until a census is taken with this object in view. My son, George Darwin, has done what is possible at present by a statistical investigation,30 and he has come to the conclusion, from his own researches and those of Dr. Mitchell, that the evidence as to any evil thus caused is conflicting, but on the whole points to the evil being very small. Birds. — Iu the case of the Fowl a whole array of authorities could be given against too close interbreeding. Sir J. Sebright positively asserts that he made many trials, and that his fowls, when thus treated, became long in the legs, small in the body, and bad breeders.31 He produced the famous Sebright Bantams by complicated crosses, and by breeding in-and-in ; and since his time there has been much close interbreeding with these animals ; and they are now notoriously bad breeders. 1 have seen Silver Bantams, directly descended from his stock, which had become almost as barren as hybrids; for not a single chicken had been that year 29 1 Descent of Man, 2nd. edit p. Review,' June, 1875. 524. 31 ' The Art of Improving the 30 ' Journal of Statistical Soc.' June, Breed,' p. 13. 1875, p. 153 ; and ' Fortnightly Chap. XVII. EVIL FROM INTERBREEDING. 105 hatched from two full nests of eggs. Mr. Hewitt says that with these Bantams the sterility of the male stands, with rare exceptions, in the closest relation with their loss of certain secondary male characters : he adds, " I have noticed, as a general rule, that even " the slightest deviation from feminine character in the tail of the " male Sebright — say the elongation by only half an inch of the two " principal tail feathers — brings with it improved probability of " increased fertility."32 Mr. Wright states33 that Mr. Clark, "whose fighting-cocks were " so notorious, continued to breed from his own kind till tbey lost " their disposition to fight, but stood to be cut up without making " auy resistance, and were so reduced in size as to be under those " weights required for the best prizes ; but on obtaining a cross " from Mr. Leighton, they again resumed their former courage and " weight." It should be borne in mind that game-cocks before they fought were always weighed, so that nothing was left to the imagi- nation about any reduction or increase of weight. Mr. Clark does not seem to have bred from brothers and sisters, which is the most injurious kind of union; and he found, after repeated trials, that there was a greater reduction in weight in the young from a father paired with his daughter, than from a mother with her son. I may add that Mr. Eyton, of Eyton, the well-known ornithologist, who is a large breeder of Grey Dorkings, informs me that they certainly diminish in size, and become less prolific, unless a cross with another strain is occasionally obtained. So it is with Malays, according to Mr. Hewitt, as far as size is concerned.34 An experienced writer35 remarks that the same amateur, as is well known, seldom long maintains the superiority of his birds ; and this, he adds, undoubtedly is due to all his stock "being of the same blood;" hence it is indispensable that he should occasionally procure a bird of another strain. But this is not necessary with those who keep a stock of fowls at different stations. Thus, Mr. Ballance, who has bred Malays for thirty years, and has won more prizes with these birds than any other fancier in England, says that breeding in-and-in does not necessarily cause deterioration ; " but all depends upon how this is managed." " My plan has been to keep about five or six distinct runs, and " to rear about two hundred or three hundred chickens each year, "and select the best birds from each run for crossing. I thus " secure sufficient crossing to prevent deterioration." 33 32 'The Poultry Book,' by W. B. Tegetmeier, 1866, p. 245. 33 ' Journal Royal Agricult. Soc.,' 1846, vol. vii. p. 205 ; see also Fergu- son on the Fowl, pp. 83, 317 ; see also ' The Poultry Book,' by Tegetmeier, 1866, p. 135, with respect to the extent to which cock-fighters found that they could venture to breed in- and-in, viz., occasionally a hen with her own son ; " but they were cautious not to repeat the in-and-in breeding." 34 'The Poultry Book,' by W. B. Tegetmeier, 1866, p. 79. 35 « The Poultry Chronicle,' 1854, vol. i. p. 43. 36 ' The Poultry Book,' by W. B. Tegetmeier, 1866, p. 79. 106 GOOD FROM CROSSING. Chat. XVII. We thus see that there is almost complete unanimity with poultry-breeders that, when fowls are kept at the same place, evil quickly follows from interbreeding carried on to an extent which would be disregarded in the case of most quadrupeds. Moreover, it is a generally received opinion that cross-bred chickens are the hardiest and most easily reared.37 Mr. Tegetme;er, who has carefully attended to poultry of all breeds, says38 that Dorking hens, allowed to run with Houdan or Crevecceur cocks, " produce in the early spring chickens that for size, hardihood, '•' early maturity, and fitness for the market, surpass those of any " pure breed that we have ever raised." Mr. Hewitt gives it as a general rule with fowls, that crossing the breed increases their size. He makes this remark after stating that hybrids from the pheasant and fowl are considerably larger than either progenitor : so again, hybrids from the male golden pheasant and female common pheasant "are of far larger size than either parent-bird." 39 To this subject of the increased size of hybrids I shall presently return. With J'ifjeons, breeders are unanimous, as previously stated, that it is absolutely indispensable, notwithstanding the trouble and expense thus caused, occasionally to cross their much-prized birds with individuals of another strain, but belonging, of course, to the same variety. It deserves notice that, when size is one of the desired characters, as with pouters,40 the evil effects of close interbreeding are much sooner perceived than when small birds, such as short-faced tumblers, are valued. The extreme delicacy of the high fancy breeds, such as these tumblers and improved English carriers, is remarkable; they are liable to many diseases, and often die in the egg or during the first moult ; and their eggs have generally to be hatched under foster-mothers. Although these highly-prized birds have invariably been subjected to much close interbreeding, yet their extreme delicacy of constitution cannot perhaps be thus fully explained. Mr. Yarrell informed me that Sir J. Sebright continued closely interbreeding some owl- pigeons, until from their extreme sterility he as nearly as possible lost the whole family. Mr. Brent41 tried to raise a breed of trumpeters, by crossing a common pigeon, and recrossing the daughter, granddaughter, great granddaughter, and great-great- granddaughter, with the same male trumpeter, until he obtained a bird with |f of trumpeters blood; but then the experiment failed, for breeding so close stopped reproduction." The ex- perienced Neumeister 42 also asserts that the offspring from dove- cotes and various other breeds are "generally very fertile and 37 'The Poultry Chronicle,' vol. i. p. 39. 38 'The Poultrv Book,' 1866, p. 210. 39 Ibid. 1866, p. 167 ; and ' Poultry Chronicle,' vol. iii., 1855, p. 15. 40 1 A Treatise on Fancv Pigeons,' by J. M. Eaton, p. 56. ' 41 ' The Pigeon Book.' p. 46. . 42 1 Das Ganze der Taubenzucht,' 1837, s. 18. Chap. XVII. evil f;:um interbreeding. 107 hardy birds : " so again, MM: Boitard and Corbie/3 after forty-five years' experience, recommend persons to cross their breeds for amusement ; for, if they fail to make interesting birds, they will succeed under an economical point of view, " as it is found that mongrels are more fertile than pigeons of pure race." I will ref3r only to one other animal, namely, t lie Hive-bee, because a distinguished entomologist has advanced this as a case of inevitable close interbreeding. As the hive is tenanted by a single female, it might have been thought that her male and female offspring would always have bred together, more especially as bees of different hives are hostile to each other ; a strange worker being almost always attacked when trying to enter another hive. But Mr. Tegetmeier has shown44 that this instinct does not apply to drones, which are permitted to enter any hive ; so that there is no a priori improbability of a queen receiving a foreign drone. The fact of the union invariably and necessarily taking place on the wing, during the queen's nuptial flight, seems to be a special provision against continued interbreeding. However this may be, experience has shown, since the introduction of the yellow-banded Ligurian race into Germany and England, that bees freely cross : Mr. Woodbury, who introduced Ligurian bees into Devonshire, found during a single season that three stocks, at distances of from one to two miles from his hives, were crossed by his drones. In one case the Ligurian drones must have flown over the city of Exeter, and over several intermediate hives. On another occasi in several common black queens were crossed by Ligurian drones at a distance of from one to three and a half miles.45 Plants. When a single plant of a new species is introduced into any country, if propagated by seed, many individuals will soon be raised, so that if the proper insects be present there will be crossing. With newly-introduced trees or other plants not propagated by seed we are not here concerned. With old-established plants it is an almost universal practice occasionally to make exchanges of seed, by which means individuals which have been exposed to different conditions of life, — and this, as we have seen with animals, diminishes the evil from close interbreeding, — will occasionally be introduced into each district. With respect to individuals belonging to the same sub- variety, Gartner, whose accuracy and experience exceeded that of all other' observers, states 46 that he has many times observed good effects from this step, especially with exotic genera, of which the fertility is somewhat impaired, such as Passiflora, Lobelia, Fuchsia. 43 ' Les Pigeons,' 1824, p. 35. pp. 39, 77, 158 ; and 1864, p. 206. 44 1 Proc. Entoroolog. Soc.,' Aug. 46 ' Beitrage zur Kenntniss der 3th, 1860, p. 126. Bofruchtung/ 1844, s. 366. 43 ' Journal of Horticulture,* 1861, 108 GOOD FROM CROSSING. Chap. XVII. Herbert also says,47 " I am inclined to think that I have derived "advantage from impregnating the flower from which I wished " to obtain seed with pollen from another individual of the same "variety, or at least from another flower, rather than with its "own." Again, Professor Lecoq ascertained that crossed offspring are more vigorous and robust than their parents.48 General statements of this kind, however, can seldom be fully trusted : I therefore began a long series of experiments, continued for about ten years, which will I think conclusively show the good effects of crossing two distinct plants of the same variety, and the evil effects of long-continued self-fertilisation. A clear light will thus be thrown on such questions, as why flowers are almost invariably constructed so as to permit, or favour, or necessi- tate the union of two individuals. "NVe shall clearly understand wThy monoecious and dioecious, — why dichogamous, dimorphic and trimorphic plants exist, and many other such cases. I intend soon to publish an account of these experiments, and I can here give only a few cases in illustration. The plan which I followed was to grow plants in the same pot, or in pots of the same size, or close together in the open ground ; carefully to exclude insects ; and then to fertilise some of the flowers with pollen from the same flower, and others on the same plant with pollen from a distinct but adjoining plant. In many of these experiments, the crossed plants yielded much more seed than the self-fertilised plants; and I have never seen the reversed case. The self- fertilised and crossed seeds thus obtained were allowed to germinate in the same glass vessel on damp sand; and as the seeds germinated, they were planted in pairs on opposite sides of the same pot, with a superficial partition between them, and were placed so as to be equally ex- posed to the light. In other cases the self- fertilised and crossed seeds were simply sown on opposite sides of the same small pot. I have, in short, followed different plans, but in every case have taken all the precautions which I could think of, so that the two lots should be equally favoured. The growth of the plants raised from the crossed and self-fertilised seed, were carefully observed from their germination to maturity, in species belonging to fifty-two genera; and the difference in their growth, and in withstanding unfavourable conditions, was in most cases manifest and strongly marked. It is of importance that the two lots of seed should be sown or planted on opposite sides of the same pot, so that the seed- lings may struggle against each other ; for if sown separately in ample and good soil, there is often but little difference in their growth. I will briefly describe two of the first cases observed by me. Six crossed and six self-fertilised seeds of Jpomoea purpurea, from plants treated in the manner above described, were planted as soon as they had germinated, in pairs on opposite sides of two pots, and rods of equal thickness were given them to twine up. Five 17 1 AmarylliJaceae,' p. 371. 48 « De la Fecondation,' 2nd edit., 18G2, p. 79. Cuai . XVII. EVIL FROM INTERBREEDING. 109 of the crossed plants grew from the first more quickly than the opposed self-fertilised plants; the sixth, however, was weakly and was for a time beaten, but at last its sounder constitution prevailed and it shot ahead of its antagonist. As soon as each crossed plant reached, the top of its seven-foot rod its fellow was measured, and the result was that, when the crossed plants were seven feet high the self-fertilised had attained the average height of only five feet four and a half inches. The crossed plants flowered a little before, and more profusely than the self-fertilised plants. On opposite sides of another small pot a large number of crossed and self- fertilised seeds were sown, so that they had to struggle for bare existence ; a single rod was given to each lot : here again the crossed plants showed from the first their advantage ; they never quite reached the summit of the seven-foot rod, but relatively to the self-fertilised plants their average height was as seven feet to five feet two inches. The experiment was repeated during several succeeding generations, treated in exactly the same manner, and with nearly the same result. In the second generation, the crossed plants, which were again crossed, produced 121 seed - capsules, whilst the self- fertilised, again self-fertilised, produced only 84 capsules. Some flowers of the Mimulus lutens were fertilised with their owrn pollen, and others were crossed with pollen from distinct plants growing in the same pot. The seeds were thickly sown on opposite sides of a pot. The seedlings were at first equal in height ; but when the young crossed plants were half an inch, the self-fertilised plants were only a quarter of an inch high. But this degree of inequality did not last, for, when the crossed plants were four and a half inches high, the self-fertilised were three inches, and they retained the same relative difference till their growth was complete. The crossed plants looked far more vigorous than the uncrossed, and flowered before them; they produced also a far greater number of capsules. As in the former case, the experiment was repeated during several succeeding gene- rations. Had I not watched these plants of Mimulus and Ipoincea during their whole growth, I could not have believed it possible, that a difference apparently so slight as that of the pollen being taken from the same flower, or from a distinct plant growing in the same pot, could have made so wonderful a difference in the growth and vigour of the plants thus produced. This, under a physiological point of view, is a most remarkable phenomenon. With respect to the benefit derived from crossing distinct varieties, plenty of evidence has been published. Sageret49 re- peatedly speaks in strong terms of the vigour of melons raised by crossing different varieties, and adds that they are more easily fertilised than common melons, and produce numerous good seed. 49 ■ Memoire sur les Cucurbitacees,' pp. 36, 28, 30. 27 110 GOOD FROM CROSSING. Cukp. XVIL Here follows the evidence of an English gardener:'0 "I have this M summer met with better success in my cultivation of melons, in " an unprotected state, from the seeds of hybrids (/>. mongrels) " obtained by cross impregnation, than with old varieties. The " offspring of three different hybridisations (one more especially, of " which the parents were the two most dissimilar varieties i could " select) each yielded more ample and finer produce than any one " of between twenty and thirty established varieties." Andrew Knight51 believed that his seedlings from crossed varieties of the apple exhibited increased vigour and luxuriance; and M. Chevreul0- alludes to the extreme vigour of some of the crossed lruit-trees raised by Sageret. By crossing reciprocally the tallest and shortest peas, Knight53 says : " I had in this experiment a striking instance of the " stimulative effects of crossing the breeds; for the smallest variety, " whose height rarely exceeded two feet, was increased to six feet : " whilst the height of the large and luxuriant kind was very little " diminished/' Mr. Laxton gave me seed-peas produced from crosses between four distinct kinds ; and the plants thus raised were extraordinarily vigorous, being in each case from one to two or three feet taller than the parent-forms growing close alongside them. "Wiegrnann54 made many crosses between several varieties of cabbage; and he speaks with astonishment of the vigour and height of the mongrels, which excited the amazement of all the gardeners who beheld them. Mr. Chaundy raised a great number of mongrels by planting together six distinct varieties of cabbage. These mongrels displayed an infinite diversity of character; "But " the most remarkable circumstance was, that, while all the other " cabbages and borecoles in the nursery were destroyed by a severe " winter, these hybrids were little injured, and supplied the kitchen " when there was no other cabbage to be had." Mr. Maund exhibited before the Boyal Agricultural Society55 specimens of crossed wheat, together with their parent varieties ; and the editor states that they were intermediate in character, " united with that greater vigour of growth, which it appears, in " the vegetable as in the animal world, is the result of a first cross." Knight also crossed several varieties of wheat,56 and he says " that " in the years 1795 and 1796, when almost the whole crop of corn " in the island was blighted, the varieties thus obtained, and these " only, escaped in this neighbourhood, though sown in several " different soils and situations." 50 Loudon's ' Gard. Mag.,' vol. viii., 1832, p. 52. 51 1 Transact. Hort. Soc.,' vol. i. p. 52 ' AnnaL des Sc. Nat.,' 3rd series, Bot., torn. vi. p. 189. 53 1 Philosophical Transactions,' 1799, p. 200. 54 ' Ueber die Bastarderzeugung,' 1828, s. 32, 33. For Mr. Chaundy's case, see Loudon's ' Gard. Mag.' vol. vii. 1831, p. 696. 55 ' Gardener's Chron.,' 1846, p 601. 5S 1 Philosoph. Transact.,' 1799, p 201. Chap. XVII. EVIL FROM INTERBREEDING. Ill Here is a remarkable case : M. Clotzsch57 crossed Pinus sylvestris and nigricans, Qitercus robur and pedunculata, Alnus glutinosa and incana, Ulmus campestris and effasa ; and the cross-fertilised seeds, as well as seeds of the pure parent-trees, were all sown at the same time and in the same place. The result was, that after an interval of eight years, the hybrids were one-third taller than the pure trees ! The facts above given refer to undoubted varieties, excepting the trees crossed by Clotzsch, which are ranked by various botanists as strongly-marked races, sub-species, or species. That true hybrids raised from entirely distinct species, though they lose in fertility, often gain in size and constitutional vigour, is certain. It would be superfluous to quote any facts; for all experimenters, Kolreuter, Gartner, Herbert, Sageret, Lecoq, and Naudin, have been struck with the wonderful vigour, height, size, tenacity of life, precocity, and hardiness of their hybrid productions. Gartner58 sums up his conviction on this head in the strongest terms. Kol- reuter59 gives numerous precise measurements of the weight and height of his hybrids in his comparison with measurements of both parent-forms ; and speaks with astonishment of their statura por- " tentosa" their "ambitus vastissimus ac altitudo valde conspicua." Some exceptions to the rule in the case of very sterile hybrids have, however, been noticed by Gartner and Herbert; but the most striking exceptions are given by Max "Wichura,60 who found that hybrid willows were generally tender in constitution, dwarf, and short-lived. Kolreuter explains the vast increase in the size of the roots, stems, <&c, of his hybrids, as the result of a sort of compensation due to their sterility, in the same way as many emasculated animals are larger than the perfect males. This view seems at first sight extremely probable, and has been accepted by various authors;61 but Gartner 62 has well remarked that there is much difficulty in fully admitting it ; for with many hybrids there is no parallelism between the degree of their sterility and their increased size and vigour. The most striking instances of luxuriant growth have been observed with hybrids which were not sterile in any extreme degree. In the genus Mirabilis, certain hybrids are unusually fertile, and their extraordinary luxuriance of growth, together with 5T Quoted in 'Bull. Bot. Soc. France,' vol ii., 1855, p. 327. 58 Gartner, ' Bastarderzeugung,' s. 259, 518, 526 et seq. 59 'Fortsetzung,' 1763, s. 29; ' Dritte Fortsetzung,' s. 44, 96 ; ' Act. Acad. St. Petersburg,' 1782, part ii., p. 251; 'Nova Acta,' 1793, pp. 391, 394; 'Nova Acta,' 1795, pp. 316, 323. 60 ' Die Bastardbefruchtung,' &c, 1865, s. 31, 41, 42. 61 Max Wichura fully accepts this view (' Bastardbefruchtung,' s. 43), as does the Rev. M. J. Berkeley, in 'Journal of Hort. Soc.,' Jan. 1866, p. 70. 62 ' Bastarderzeugung,' s. 394, 526, 528. GOOD FROM (.KOISING. Chap. XVIL their enormous roots,63 have been transmitted to their progeny. The result in all cases is probably in part clue to the saving of nutriment and vital force through the sexual organs acting imper- fectly or not at all, but more especially to the general law of good being derived from a cross. For it deserves especial attention that mongrel animals and plants, which are so far from being sterile that their fertility is often actually augmented, have, as previously shown, their size, hardiness, and constitutional vigour generally increased. It is not a little remarkable that an accession of vigour and size should thus arise under the opposite contingencies of increased and diminished fertility. It is a perfectly well ascertained fact64 that hybrids invariably breed with either pure parent, and not rarely with a distinct species, more readily than with one another. Herbert is inclined to explain even this fact by the advantage derived from a cross ; but Gartner more justly accounts for it by the pollen of the hybrid, and probably its ovules, being in some degree vitiated, whereas the pollen and ovules of both pure parents and of any third species are scund. Nevertheless, there are some well-ascertained and re- markable facts, which, as we shall presently see, show that a cross by itself undoubtedly tends to increase or re-establish the fertility of hybrids. The same law, namely, that the crossed offspring both of varieties and species are larger than the parent-forms, holds good in the most striking manner with hybrid animals as well as with mongrels. Mr. Bartlett, who has had such large experience says, " Among all " hybrids of vertebrated animals there is a marked increase of size." He then enumerates many cases with mammals, including monkeys, and with various families of birds.6,3 On certain Hermaphrodite Plants which, either normally or abnor- mally, require to be fertilised by pollen from a distinct individual or species. The facts now to be given differ from the foregoing, as self-sterility is not here the result of long-continued close interbreeding. These facts are, however, connected with our present subject, because a cross with a distinct individual is shown to be either necessary or advantageous. Dimorphic and trimorphic plants, though they are hermaphrodites, must be reciprocally crossed, one set of forms by the other, in order to be fully fertile, and in some cases to be fertile in any degree. 63 Kolreuter, 'Nova Acta," 1795, 430. p. 316. M Quoted by Dr. Murie, in ' Proc 04 Gartner, 1 Bastarderzeugung,' s. Zoolog. Soc.,' 1870, p. 40. Chap. XVII. EVIL FROM IXTEKBREEDIXG. 113 But I should not have noticed these plants, had it not been for the following cases given by Dr. Hildebrand :66 — Primula sinensis is a reciprocally dimorphic species : Dr. Hilde- brand fertilised twenty-eight flowers of both forms, each by pollen of the other form, and obtained the full number of capsules containing on an average 427 seed per capsule ; here we have complete and normal fertility. He then fertilised forty-two flowers of both forms with pollen of the same form, but taken from a distinct plant, and all produced capsules containing on an average only 11HS seed. Lastly, and here we come to our more immediate point, he fertilised forty-eight flowers of both forms with pollen of the same form and taken from the same flower, and now he obtained only thirty-two capsules, and these contained on an average 18 6 seed, or one less per capsule than in the former case. So that, with these illegitimate unions, the act of impregnation is less assured, and the fertility slightly less, when the pollen and ovules belong to the same flower, than when belonging to two distinct individuals of the same form. Dr. Hildebrand has recently made analogous experiments on the long-styled form of Oxalis rosea, with the same result.67 It has recently been discovered that certain plants, whilst growing in their native country under natural conditions, cannot be fertilised with pollen from the same plant. They are sometimes so utterly self-impotent, that, though they can readily be fertilised by the pollen of a distinct species or even distinct genus, yet, wonderful as is the fact, they never produce a single seed by their own pollen. In some cases, moreover, the plant's own pollen and stigma mutually act on each other in a deleterious manner. Most of the facts to be given relate to orchids, but I will commence with a plant belonging to a widely different family. Sixty-three flowers of CorydaJis aca, borne on distinct plants, were fertilised by Dr. Hildebrand 08 with pollen from other plants of the same species; and tifty-eight capsules were obtained, iucluding on an average 45 seed in each. He then fertilised sixteen flowers produced by the same raceme, one with another, but obtained only three capsules, one of which alone contained any good seeds, namely, two in number. Lastly, he fertilised twenty-seven flowers, each with its own pollen; he left also fifty-seven flowers to be spontaneously fertilised, and this would certainly have ensued if it 65 ; Botanische Zeitung,' Jan. 1864-, Berlin, 1866, s. 372. *• 3. International Hort. Congress, 57 ' Monatabericht Akai. WissenJ London, 1866. 114 GOOD FROM CROSSING. Chap. XVII. had been possible, for the anthers not only touch the stigma, but the pollen-tubes were «een by Dr. Hildebiand to penetrate it; nevertheless these eighty-four flowers did not produce a single seed-capsule ! This whole case is highly instructive, as it shows how widely different the action of the same pollen is, according as it is placed on the stigma of the same flower, or on that of another flower on the same raceme, or on that of a distinct plant. With exotic Orchids several analogous cases have been observed, chiefly by Mr. John Scott.69 Oncidium sphacelatum has effective pollen, for Mr. Scott fertilised two distinct species with it; the ovules are likewise capable of impregnation, for they were readily fertilised by the pollen of 0. divarication ; nevertheless, between one and two hundred flowers fertilised by their own pollen did not produce a single capsule, though the stigmas were penetrated by the pollen-tubes. Mr. Eobertson Munro, of the Boyal Botanic Gardens of Edinburgh, also informs me (1864) that a hundred and twenty flowers of this same species were fertilised by him with their own pollen, and did not produce a capsule, but eight flowers, fertilised by the pollen of 0. dioaricatum, produced four fine cap- sules: again, between two and three hundred flowers of 0. divan* catum, fertilised by their own pollen, did not set a capsule, but twelve flowers fertilised by O.Jiexuosum produced eight fine cap- sules : so that here we have three utterly self-impotent species, with their male and female organs perfect, as shown by their mutual fertilisation. In these cases fertilisation was effected only by the aid of a distinct species. But, as we shall presently see, distinct plants, raised from seed, of Oncidium flexuosum, and probably of the other species, would have been perfectly capable of fertilising each other, for this is the natural process. Again, Mr. Scott found that the pollen of a plant of 0. microchilum was effective, for with it he ferti- lised two distinct species ; he found its ovules good, for they could be fertilised by the pollen of one of these species, and by the pollen of a distinct plant of 0. microchilum; but they could not be ferti- lised by pollen of the same plant, though the pollen-tubes penetrated the stigma. An analogous case has been recorded by M. Riviere,70 with two plants of 0. cavendisldanum, which wrere both self-sterile, but reciprocally fertilised each other. All these cases refer to the genus Oncidium, but Mr. Scott found that Maxillaria atro-rubens was " totally insusceptible of fertilisation with its own pollen." but fertilised, aud was fertilised by, a widely distinct species, viz. M. squalens. As these orchids had been grown under unnatural conditions in hot-houses, I concluded that their self-sterility was due to this cause. But Fritz Muller informs me that at Desterro, in Brazil, he u9 1 Proc. Bot Soc. of Edinburgh,' May, 18(33 : these observations are given in abstract, and others are added, in the 'Journal of Proc. of Linn. Soc.,' vol. viii. Bot., 1364-. p. 162. 70 Prof. Lecoq, 1 De la Fecondation, 2nd edit.. 1862, p. 76. Chap. XYII. SELF-IMPOTENT PLANTS. 115 fertilised above one hundred flowers of the above-mentioned Onci- dium flexuosum, which is there endemic, with its own pollen, and with that taken from distinct plants : all tbe former were sterile, whilst those fertilised by pollen from any other plant of the same species were fertile. During the first three days there was no difference in the action of the two kinds of pollen : that placed on stigma of the same plant separated in the usual manner into grains, and emitted tubes which penetrated the column, and the stigmatic chamber shut itself; but only those flowers which had been fertilised by pollen taken from a distinct plant produced seed-capsules. On a subsequent occasion these experiments were repeated on a large scale with the same result. Fritz Miiller found that four other endemic species of Oncidium were in like manner utterly sterile with their own pollen, but fertile with that from any other plant : some of them likewise produced seed-capsules when impregnated with pollen of widely distinct genera, such as Cyrtopodium, and Eodriguezia. Oncidium crispum, however, differs from the fore- going species in varying much in its self-sterility ; some plants producing fine pods with their own pollen, others failing to do so in two or three instances, Fritz Miiller observed that the pods pro- duced by pollen taken from a distinct flower on the same plant, were larger than those produced by the flower's own pollen. In L),idMetzger, ' Getreidearten,' 1841, s. 63. For France, Loiseleur- Deslongchamps ('Consid. sur les Cereales,' 1843, p. 200) gives nu- merous references on this subject. For Southern France, see Godron, ' Florula Juvenalis,' 1854, p. 28. 2 'A General Treatise of Hus- bandry,' vol. iii. p. 58. 3 'Gardener's Chronicle and Agri- cult. Gazette,' 1858, p. 247 ; and for the second statement, Ibid., 1850, p. 702. On this same subject, see also Rev. D. Walker's ' Prize Essay of Highland Agri^ult. Soc.,' vol. ii. p. 200. Also Marshall's 'Minutes of Agriculture,' November, 1775. 4 Oberlin's ' Memo»r3,-' Eng. trans- late p. 73. For I ancashire, see Marshall's ' Review of Reports,' 1808, p. 295. 5 'Cottage Gardener,' t£56, p. 183. For Mr. Robson's subsequent state- ments, see 'Journal of Horticulture^ Feb. 18, 1866, p. 121. For Mr Abbey's remarks on grafting, &c. Ibid., July 18, 1865, p. 44. CHAr. XVIII. FROM CHANGED CONDITIONS. 129 that he has himself witnessed decided advantage from obtaining bulbs of the onion, tubers of the potato, and various seeds, all of the same kind, from different soils and distant parts of England. He further states that with plants propagated by cuttings, as with the Pelargonium, and especially the Dahlia, manifest advantage is derived from getting plants of the same variety, which have been cultivated in another place; or, "where the extent of the place " allows, to take cuttings from one description of soil to plant on " another, so as to afford the change that seems so necessary to the " well-being of the plants." He maintains that after a time an exchange of this nature is " forced on the grower, whether he be " prepared for it or not." Similar remarks have been made by another excellent gardener, Mr. Fish, namely, that cuttings of the same variety of Calceolaria, which he obtained from a neighbour, " showed much greater vigour than some of his own that were " treated in exactly the same manner," and he attributed this solely to his own plants having become " to a certain extent worn " out or tired of their quarters." Something of this kind appar- ently occurs in grafting and budding fruit-trees ; for, according to Mr. Abbey, grafts or buds generally take with greater facility on a distinct variety or even species, or on a stock previously grafted, than on stocks raised from seeds of the variety which is to be grafted ; and he believes this cannot be altogether explained by the stocks in question being better adapted to the soil and climate of the place. It should, however, be added, that varieties grafted or budded on very distinct kinds, though they may take more readily and grow at first more vigorously than when grafted on closely allied stocks, afterwards often become unhealthy. I have studied M. Tessier's careful and elaborate experiments,6 made to disprove the common belief that good is derived from a change of seed ; and he certainly shows that the same seed may with care be cultivated on the same farm (it is not stated whether on exactly the same soil) for ten consecutive years without loss. Another excellent observer, Colonel Le Couteur,7 has come to the same conclusion ; but then he expressly adds, if the same seed be used, " that which is grown on land manured from the mixen one " year becomes seed for land prepared with lime, and that again " becomes seed for land dressed with ashes, then for land dressed " with mixed manure, and so on." But this in effect is a systematic exchange of seed, within the limits of the same farm. On the whole the belief, which has long been held by many cultivators, that good follows from exchanging seed, tubers, &c, seems to be fairly well founded. It seems hardly credible that the advantage thus derived can be due to the seeds, especially if very small ones, obtaining in one soil some 6 ; Mem. de l'Acad. des Sciences,' 7 ' On the Varieties of Wheat,' p* 1790, p. 209. 52. 130 STERILITY FROM Chap. XVIII. chemical element deficient in the other and in sufficient quantity to influence the whole after-growth of the plant. As plants after once germinating are fixed to the same spot, it might have been anticipated that they would show the good effects of a change more plainly than do animals which continually wander about ; and this apparently is the case. Life depending on, or consisting in, an incessant play of the most complex forces, it would appear that their action is in some way stimulated by slight changes in the circum- stances to which each organism is exposed. All forces through- out nature, as Mr. Herbert Spencer8 remarks, tend towards an equilibrium, and for the life of each organism it is neces- sary that this tendency should be checked. These views and the foregoing facts probably throw light, on the one hand, on the good effects of crossing the breed, for the germ will be thus slightly modified or acted on by new forces ; and on the other hand, on the evil effects of close interbreeding prolonged during many generations, during which the germ will be acted on by a male having almost identically the same constitution. Sterility from Changed Conditions of Life. I will now attempt to show that animals and plants, when removed from their natural conditions, are often rendered in some degree infertile or completely barren ; and this occurs even Avhen the conditions have not been greatly changed. This conclusion is not necessarily opposed to that at which we have just arrived, namely, that lesser changes of other kinds are advantageous to organic beings. Our present subject is of some importance, from having an intimate con- nection with the causes of variability. Indirectly it perhaps bears on the sterility of species when crossed : for as, on the one hand, slight changes in the conditions of life are favour- able to plants and animals, and the crossing of varieties adds 8 Mr. Spencer has fully and ably from cross-breeding, and of the evil discussed this whole subject in his effects from great changes in the con- ' Principles of Biology,' 1 864-, vol. ii. ditions anl from crossing widely dis- ch. x. In the first edition of my tinct forms, as a series of facts " con- ' Origin of Species,' 18'>9, p. 267, I nected together by some common but spoke of the good effects from slight unknown bond, which is essentially changes in the conditions of life and related to the principle of life. Chap. XVIII. CHANGED CONDITIONS. 131 to the size, vigour, and fertility of their offspring ; so, on tho other hand, certain other changes in the conditions of life cause sterility; and as this likewise ensues from crossing much-modified forms or species, we have a parallel and double series of facts, which apparently stand in close relation to each other. It is notorious that many animals, though perfectly tamed, refuse to breed in captivity. Isidore Geoffroy St.-Hilaire9 consequently has drawn a broad distinction between tamed animals which will not breed under captivity, and truly domesticated animals which breed freely — generally more freely, as shown in the sixteenth chapter, than in a state of nature. It is possible and generally easy to tame most animals ; but experience has shown that it is difficult to get them to breed regularly, or even at all. I shall discuss this subject in detail ; but will give only those cases which seem most illustrative. My materials are derived from notices scattered through various works, and especially from a Keport, kindly drawn up for me by the officers of the Zoological Society of London, which has especial value, as it records all the cases, during nine years from 1838-46, in which the animals were seen to couple but produced no offspring, as well as the cases in which they never, as far as known, coupled. This MS. Report I have corrected by the annual Keports subsequently published up to the year I860.10 Many facts are given on the breeding of the animals in that magnificent work, 'Gleanings from the Menageries of Knowsley Hall,' by Dr. Gray. I made, also, particular inquiries from the expe- rienced keeper of the birds in the old Surrey Zoological Gardens. I should premise that a slight change in the treat- ment of animals sometimes makes a great difference in their fertility ; and it is probable that the results observed in 9 ' Essais de Zoologie Generale,' kept, and of these 1 species in 1*9 1841. p. 256. have bred at least once during the 10 Since the appearance of the first 20 years; of 28 Marsupialia, 1 in 2 '5 oiition of this work, Mr. Sclater has have bred ; of 74 Carnivora, 1 in 3'0 published (' Proc. Zoolog. Soc.,' 1868, have bred; of 52 Kodentia. 1 in 4*7 p. 623) a list of the species of mam- have bred; and of Quadrumana 75 mals which have bred in the gardens species have been kept, and 1 in 6'2 from 1848 to 1867 inclusive. Of the have bred. Artiodactyla 85 species have been 132 STERILITY FROM Ciiai\ xvi ri. different menageries would differ. Indeed, some animals in our Zoological Gardens have become more productive since the year 18-46. It is, also, manifest from F. Cuvier's account of the Jardin des Plantes,11 that the animals formerly bred much less freely there than with us ; for instance, in the Duck tribe, which is highly prolific, only one species had at that period produced young. The mo.-t remarkable cases, however, are afforded by animals kept in their native country, which, though perfectly tamed, quite healthy, and allowed some freedom, are absolutely incapable of breeding. Kengger,1* who in Paraguay particularly attended to this subject, specifies six quadrupeds in this condition ; and he mentions two or three others which most rarely breed. Mr. Bates, in his admirable work on the Amazons, strongly insists on similar cases ; 13 and he remarks, that the fact of thoroughly tamed native mammals and birds not breeding when kept by the Indians, cannot be wholly accounted for by their negligence or indifference, for the turkey and fowl are kept and bred by various remote tribes. In almost every part of the world — for instance, in the interior of Africa, and in several of the Polynesian islands — the natives are extremely fond of taming the indigenous quadrupeds and birds; but they rarely or never succeed in getting them to breed. The most notorious case of an animal not breeding in captivity is that of the elephant. Elephants are kept in large numbers in their native Indian home, live to old age, and are vigorous enough for the severest labour ; yet, with a very few exceptions, they have never been known even to couple, though both males and females have their proper periodical seasons. If, however, we proceed a little eastward to Ava, we hear from Mr. Crawfurd 14 that their " breeding in the domestic state, or at least in the half-domestic state in which the female elephants are generally kept, is of every- day occurrence ;" and Mr. Crawfurd informs me that he believes that the difference must be attributed solely to the females being allowed to roam the forest with some degree of freedom. The captive rhinoceros, on the other hand, seems from Bishop Heber's account15 to breed in India far more readily than the elephant. Four wild species of the horse genus have bred in Europe, though here exposed co a great change in their natural habits of life ; but the species have generally been crossed one with another. Most of 11 Du Rut, 'Annales du Museum,' 1807, torn. ix. p. 120. 12 ' S'augethiere von Paraguay,' 1830, s. 49, 106, 118, 124, 201, 2u8, 249, 265, 327. 13 ' The Naturalist on the Amazons,' 1863, vol. i. pp. 99, 193 ; vol. ii. p. 113. 14 1 Embassy to the Court of Ava,' vol. i. p. 534. 15 « Journal,' vol. i. p. 213. Chap. XVIII. CHANGED CONDITIONS. 133 the members of the pig family breed readily in our menageries ; even the Eed Biver hog (Potamochcerus penicillatus), from the sweltering plains of West Africa, has bred twice in the Zoological Gardens. Here also the Peccary (Dicoti/les torquatus) has bred several times ; but another species, the D. labiatus, though ren- dered so tame as to be half-domesticated, is said to breed so rarely in its native country of Paraguay, that according to Eengger 16 the fact requires confirmation. Mr. Bates remarks that the tapir, though often kept tame in Amazonia by the Indians, never breeds. Ruminants generally breed quite freely in England, though brought from widely different climates, as may be seen in the Annual Reports of the Zoological Gardens, and in the Gleanings from Lord Derby's menagerie. The Carnivora, with the exception of the Plantigrade division, breed (though with capricious exceptions) about half as freely as ruminants. Many species of Felidre have bred in various mena- geries, although imported from diverse climates and closely con- fined. Mr. Bartlett, the present superintendent of the Zoological Gardens,17 remarks that the lion appears to breed more frequently and to bring forth more young at a birth than any other species of the family. He adds that the tiger has rarely bred ; " but there are several wTell-authenticated instances of the female tiger breed- ing with the lion." Strange as the fact may appear, many animals under confinement unite with distinct species and xn-oduce hybrids quite as freely as, or even more freely than, with their own species. On inquiring from Dr. Falconer and others, it appears that the tiger when confined in India does not breed, though it has been known to couple. The chetah (Fclis jubata) has never been known by Mr. Bartlett to breed in England, but it has bred at Frankfort ; nor does it breed in India, where it is kept in large numbers for hunting ; but no pains would be taken to make them breed, as only those animals which have hunted for themselves in a state of nature are serviceable and worth training.18 According to Eengger, two species of wild cats in Paraguay, though thoroughly tamed, have never bred. Although so many of the Felidse breed readily in the Zoological Gardens, yet conception by no means always follows union : in the nine-year Report, various species are specified which were observed to couple seventy-three times, and no doubt this must have passed many times unnoticed ; yet from the seventy-three unions only fifteen births ensued. The Carnivora in the Zoological Gardens were formerly less freely exposed to the air and cold than at present, and this change of treatment, as I was assured by the former superintendent, Mr. Miller, greatly increased their fertility. Mr. Bartlett, and there cannot be a more capable 16 ' Saugethiere,' s. 327. 140. 17 On the Breeding of the Larger 18 Sleeman's 'Rambles in India,' lielidae, ' Proc. Zoolog. Soc.,' 1861, p. vol. ii. p. 10. 28 134 STERILITY FROM Chaf. XVIIL judge, says, " it is remarkable that lions breed more freely in " travelling collections than in the Zoological Gardens ; probably " the constant excitement and irritation produced by moving from " place to place, or change of air, may have considerable influence " in the matter." Many members of the Dog family breed readily when confined. The Dhole is one of the most untamable animals in India, yet a pair kept there by Dr. Falconer produced young. Foxes, on the other hand, rarely breed, and I have never heard of such an occur- rence with the European fox: the silver fox of North America (Cariis argentatus), however, has bred several times in the Zoo- logical Gardens. Even the otter has bred there. Every one knows how readily the semi-domesticated ferret breeds, though shut up in miserably small cages ; but other specie's of Viverra and Paradoxurus absolutely refuse to breed in the Zoological Gardens. The Genetta has bred both here and in the Jardin des Plantes, and produced hybrids. The Herpestes fasciutus has likewise bred ; but I was formerly assured that the //. griseus, though many were kept in the Gardens, never bred. The Plantigrade Carnivora breed under confinement much less freely than other Carnivora, although no reason can be assigned for this fact. In the nine-year Report it is stated that the bears had been seen in the Zoological Gardens to couple freely, but previously to 1848 had most rarely conceived. In the Reports published since this date three species have produced young (hybrids in one case), and, wonderful to relate, the white Polar bear has produced young. The badger (Meles tarns) has bred several times in the Gardens ; but I have not heard of this occurring elsewhere in England, and the event must be very rare, for an instance in Germany has been thought worth recording.19 In Paraguay the native Nasua, though kept in pairs during many years and perfectly tamed, has never been known, according to Rengger, to breed or show any sexual passion ; nor, as I hear from Mr. Bates, does this animal, or the Cercoleptes, breed in Amazonia. Two other plantigrade genera, Procyon and Gulo, though often kept tame in Paraguay, never breed there. In the Zoological Gardens species of Nasua and Procyon have been seen to couple ; but they did not produce young. As domesticated rabbits, guinea-pigs, and white mice breed so abundantly when closely confined under various climates, it might have been thought that most other members of the Rodent order would have bred in captivity, but this is not the case. It deserves notice, as showing how the capacity to breed sometimes goes by affinity, that the one native rodent of Paraguay, which there breeds freely and has yielded successive generations, is the L'a via aperea; and this animal is so closely allied to the guinea-pig, 19 Wiegmann's ' Archiv fiir Xaturgesch.,' 1837, s. 162. Chap. XVIIL CHANGED CONDITIONS. 135 that it has been erroneously thought to be the parent form.20 In the Zoological Gardens, some rodents have coupled, but have never produced young ; some have neither coupled nor bred ; but a few have bred, as the porcupine more than once, the Barbary mouse, lemming, chinchilla, and agouti (Dasyprocta aguti) several times. This latter animal has also produced young in Paraguay, though they were born dead and ill-formed ; but in Amazonia, according to Mr. Bates, it never breeds, though often kept tame about the houses. Nor does the paca (Coelogenys paca) breed there. The common hare when confined has, I believe, never bred in Europe ; though, according to a recent statement, it has crossed with the rabbit.21 I have never heard of the dormouse breeding in confine- ment. But squirrels offer a more curious case : with one exception, no species has bred in the Zoological Gardens, yet as many as fourteen individuals of S. palmarum were kept together during several years. The S. cinera has been seen to couple, but it did not produce young ; nor has this species, when rendered extremely tame in its native country, North America, been ever known to breed.22 At Lord Derby's menagerie squirrels of many kinds were kept in numbers, but Mr. Thompson, the superintendent, told me that none had ever bred there, or elsewhere as far as he knew. I have never heard of the English squirrel breeding in confinement. But the species which has bred more than once in the Zoological Gardens is the one which perhaps might have been least expected, namely, the flying squirrel (Sciuropterus volucella) : it has, also, bred several times near Birmingham ; but the female never pro- duced more than two young at a birth, whereas in its native American home she bears from three to six young.23 Monkeys, in the nine-year Report from the Zoological Gardens, are stated to unite most freely, but during this period, though many individuals were kept, there were only seven births. I have heard of only one American monkey, the Ouistiti, breeding in Europe.-4 A Macacus, according to Flourens, bred in Paris ; and 20 Rengger, ' S'augethiere,' &c, s. 276. On the parentage of the guinea- pig, see also hid. Geofiroy St.-Hilaire, ' Hist. Nat. Gen.' I sent to Mr. H. Denny of Leeds the lice which I col- lected from the wild aperea in La Plata, and he informs me that they belong to a genus distinct from those found on the guinea-pig. This is important evidence that the aperea is not the parent of the guinea-pig ; and is worth giving, as some authors erro- neously suppose that the guinea-pig since being domesticated has become sterile when crossed with the aperea. 31 Although the existence of the Leporides, as described by Dr. Broca ('Journal de Phys.,' torn. ii. p. 370), has been positively denied, yet Dr. Pi- geaux (' Annals and Mag. of Nat. Hist.' vol. xx., 1867, p. 75) affirms that the hare and rabbit have produced hybrids. 22 ' Quadrupeds of North America, by Audubon and Bachman, 1846, p. 268. 23 Loudon's 'Mag. of Nat. Hist.,' vol. ix., 1836, p. 571 ; Audubon and Bachman's ' Quadrupeds of North America,' p. 221. 24 Flourens, ' De l'lnstinct,' &o., 1845, p. 88. 136 STERILITY FROM Chap, a f 1IL more than one species of this genus has produced young in London, especially the Macacus rhesus, which everywhere shows a special capacity to breed under confinement. Hybrids have been produced both in Paris and London from this same genus. The Arabian baboon, or Cynocephalus hamadryas2'0 and a Cercopithecus have bred in the Zoological Gardens, and the latter species at the Duke of Northumberland's. Several members of the family of Lemurs have produced hybrids in the Zoological Gardens. It is much more remarkable that monkeys very rarely breed when confined in their native country ; thus the Cay (Cebus aza ret) is frequently and completely tamed in Paraguay, but Rengger 26 says that it breeds so rarely, that he never saw more than two females which had produced young. A similar observation has been made with respect to the monkeys which are frequently tamed by the aborigines in Brazil.27 In Amazonia, these animals are so often kept in a tame state, that Mr. Bates in walking through the streets of Para counted thirteen species ; but, as he asserts, they have never been known to breed in captivity.28 Birds. Birds offer in some respects better evidence than quadrupeds, from their breeding more rapidly and being kept in greater numbers.29 We have seen that carnivorous animals are more fertile under confinement than most other mammals. The reverse holds good with carnivorous birds. It is said30 that as many as eighteen species have been used in Europe for hawking, and several others in Persia and India ; 31 they have been kept in their native country in the finest condition, and have been flown during six, eight, or nine years ; 32 yet there is no record of their having ever produced young. As these birds were formerly caught whilst young, at great expense, being imported from Iceland, Norway, 25 See 'Annual Reports Zoolog. Soc.' 1855, 1858, 1863, 1864; 'Times' newspaper, Aug. 10th, 1847; Flou- reus, ' De l'lnstinct,' p. 85. 86 ' Saugethiere,' &c, s. 34, 49. 27 Art. Brazil, ' Penny Cyclop.,' p. 363. 28 ' The Naturalist on the Amazons,' vol. i. p. 99. 29 A list of the species of birds which have, bred in the Zoological Gr.rdens from 1848 to 1867 inclusive has been published by Mr. Sclater in ' Proc. Zoolog. Soc.,' 1869, p. 626, since the first edition of this work appeared. Of Columba; 51 species have been kept, and of Anseres 80 species, and in both these families, 1 species in 2 • 6 have bred at least once in the 20 years. Of Gallimc, 83 species have been kept, and 1 in 2*7 have bred ; of 57 Gralla?, 1 in 9 have bred; of 110 Prehensores, 1 in 22 have bred ; of 178 Passeres, 1 in 25*4 have bred; of 94 Accipitres, 1 in 47 have bred ; of 25 Picariaj, and of 35 Herodiones, not one species in either group has bred. 30 ' Lncyclop. of Rural Sports,' p. 691. 31 According to Sir A. Burnes (' Cabool,' &c, p. 51), eight species are used for hawking in Sinde. 32 Loudon's 'Mag. of Nat. Hist.,' vol. vi., 1833, p. 110. Chap. XVIII. CHANGED CONDITIONS. 137 and Sweden, there can be little doubt that, if possible, they would have been propagated. In the Jardin des Plantes, no bird of prey has been known to couple.33 No hawk, vulture, or owl has ever produced fertile eggs in the Zoological Gardens, or in the old Surrey Gardens, with the exception, in the former place on one occasion, of a condor and a kite (Milvus niger). Yet several species, namely, the Aquila fusca, Ealicatus leucocephalus, Fako tinnuncutus, F. sub- bitteo, and Buteo vulgaris, have been seen to couple in the Zoological Gardens. Mr. Morris 34 mentions as a unique fact that a kestrel (Fako tinnunculus) bred in an aviary. The one kind of owl which has been known to couple in the Zoological Gardens was the Eagle Owl (Bubo maximus) ; and this species shows a special inclination to breed in captivity; for a pair at Arundel Castle, kept more nearly in a state of nature " than ever fell to the lot of an animal deprived of its liberty," 35 actually reared their young. Mr. Gurney has given another instance of this same owl breeding in confinement ; and he records the case of a second species of owl, the Strix passerina, breeding in captivity.36 Of the smaller graminivorous birds, many kinds have been kept tame in their native countries, and have lived long ; yet, as the highest authority on cage-birds37 remarks, their propagation is " uncommonly difficult." The canary-bird shows that there is no inherent difficulty in these birds breeding freely in confinement ; and Audubon says38 that the Fringilla (Sjnza) ciris of North America breeds as perfectly as the canary. The difficulty with the many finches which have been kept in confinement is all the more remarkable as more than a dozen species could be named which have yielded hybrids with the canary; but hardly any of these, with the exception of the siskin (Fringilla spi>2«.s), have reproduced their own kind. Even the bullfinch (Loxia pyrrhula) has bred as frequently with the canary, though belonging to a distinct genus, as with its own species.39 "With respect to the skylark (Alauda arvensis), I have heard of birds living for seven years in an aviary, which never produced young; and a great- London bird-fancier assured me that he had never known an instance of their breeding ; nevertheless one case has been recorded.40 In the nine-year Eeport from the Zoological Society, twenty-four 33 F. Cuvier, ' Annal. du Museum,' torn. ix. p. 128. 34 ' The Zoologist.' vol. vii.-viii., 1849-50, p. 2648. 35 Knox, ' Ornithological Rambles in Sussex,' p. 91. 36 'The Zoologist,' vol. vii.-viii., 1849-50, p. 2566 ; vol. ix.-x., 1851-2, p. 3207. 37 Bechstein, ' Naturgesch. der Stu- benvogel,' 1840, s. 20. 38 ' Ornithological Biography,' vol. v. p. 517. 39 A case is recorded in ' The Zoo- logist,' vol. i.-ii., 1843-45, p. 453. For the siskin breeding, vol. iii.-iv., 1845- 46, p. 1075. Bechstein, 1 Stuben- vogel,' s. 139, speaks of bullfinches making nests, but rarely producing young. 40 Yarrell's 'Hist. British Birds,' 1839, vol. i. p. 412. 138 STERILITY FROM Chap. XVIIL iiisessorial species are enumerated which had not bred, and of these only four were known to have coupled. Parrots are singularly long-lived birds ; and Humboldt mentions the curious fact of a parrot in South America, which spoke the language of an extinct Indian tribe, so that this bird preserved the sole relic of a lost language. Even in this country there is reason to believe41 that parrots have lived to the age of nearly one hundred years ; yet they breed so rarely, though many have been kept in Europe, that the event has been thought worth recording in the gravest publications.42 Nevertheless, when Mr. Buxton turned out a large number of parrots in Norfolk, three pairs bred and reared ten young birds in the course of two seasons ,• and this success may be attributed to their free life.43 According toBechstein^4 the African Psittacus erithacus breeds oftener than any other species in Germany : the P. macoa occasionally lays fertile eggs, but rarely succeeds in hatching them; this bird, however, has the instinct of incubation sometimes so strongly developed, that it will hatch the eggs of fowls or pigeons. In the Zoological Gardens and in the old Surrey Gardens some few species have coupled, but, with the exception of three species of parrakeets, none have bred. It is a much more remarkable fact that in Guiana parrots of two kinds, as I am informed by Sir E. Schomburgk, are often taken from the nests by the Indians and reared in large numbers ; they are so tame that they fly freely about the houses, and come when called to be fed, like pigeons ; yet he has never heard of a single instance of their breeding.45 In Jamaica, a resident naturalist, Mr. K. Hill,46 says, "no birds more readily submit to human "dependence than the parrot-tribe, but no instance of a parrot " breeding in this tame life has been known yet." Mr. Hill specifies a number of other native birds kept tame in the West Indies, which never breed in this state. The great pigeon family offers a striking contrast with the parrots : in the nine-year Report thirteen species are recorded as having bred, and, what is more noticeable, only two were seen to couple without any result. Since the above date every annual Report gives many cases of various pigeons breeding. The two magnificent crowned pigeons (Goura coronata and victorict) produced hybrids; 41 Loudon's ' Mag. of Nat. History,' vol. xix., 1836, p. 347. 42 ' Memoires du Museum d'Hist. Nat.,' torn. x. p. 314: five cases of parrots breeding in France are here recorded. S:e also ' Report Brit. Assoc. Zoolog.,' 1843. 43 ' Annals and Mag. of Nat. Hist.,' Nov. 1868, p. 311. 44 1 Stubenvogel,' s. 105, 83. 45 Dr. Hancock remarks (' Charles- worth's Mag. of Nat. Hist.' vol. ii., 1838, p. 492), "it is singular that, amongst the numerous useful birds that are indigenous to Guiana, none are found to propagate among the Indians ; yet the common fowl is reared in abundance throughout the country." 46 'A Week at Pert Royal,' 1855, p. 7. Chap. XVIII- CHANGED CONDITIONS. 139 nevertheless, of the former species more than a dozen birds were kept, as I am informed by Mr. Crawfurd, in a park at Penang, under a perfectly well-adapted climate, but never once bred. The Columbq migratoria in its native country, North America, invariably lays two eggs, but in Lord Derby's menagerie never more than one. The same fact has been observed with the C. hucocp-phala*? Gallinaceous birds of many genera likewise show an eminent capacity for breeding under captivity. This is particularly the case with pheasants, yet our English species seldom lays more than ten eggs in confinement ; whilst from eighteen to twenty is the usual number in the wild state.48 With the Gallinacese, as with all other orders, there are marked and inexplicable exceptions in regard to the fertility of certain species and genera under confinement. Although many trials have been made with the common partridge, it has rarely bred, even when reared in large aviaries ; and the hen will never hatch hei own eggs.*9 The American tribe of Guans or Cracidae are tamed with remarkable ease, but are very shy breeders in this country;50 but with care various species were formerly made to breed rather freely in Holland.51 Birds of this tribe are often kept in a perfectly tamed condition in their native country by the Indians, but they never breed.52 It might have been expected that grouse from their habits of life would not have bred in captivity, more especially as they are said soon to languish and die.53 But many cases are recorded of their breeding : the caper- cailzie {Tetrao urogaUus) has bred in the Zoological Gardens; it breeds without much difficulty when confined in Norway, and in Russia five successive generations have been reared : Tetrao tetrix has likewise bred in Norway ; T. scoticus in Ireland ; T. umbellus at Lord Derby's; and T. cupido in North America. It is scarcely possible to imagine a greater change in habits than that which the members of the ostrich family must suffer, when cooped up in small enclosures under a temperate climate, after freely roaming over desert and tropical plains or entangled forests; 47 Audubon, ' American Ornith- ology,' vol. v. pp. 552, 557. 4* Moubray on Poultiy, 7th edit., p. 133. 49 Temminck, ' Hist. Nat. Gen. des Pigeons,' &c, 1813, torn. iii. pp. 288, 382; 'Annals and Mag. of Nat. Hist.,' vol xii., 1843, p. 4-53. Other species of partridge have occasionally bred ; as the red-legged (P. ru'.ra), when kept in a large court in France (see ' Journal de Physique,' torn. xxv. p. 294), and in the Zoological Gardens in 1856. *• Rev. E. S. Dixon, 'The Dove- cote,' 1851, pp. 243-252. 51 Temminck, ' Hist. Nat. Gen. des Pigeons,' &c., torn. ii. pp. 456,458; torn. iii. pp. 2, 13. 47. 52 Bates, 'The Naturalist on the Amazons,' vol. i. p. 193 ; vol. ii. p. 112. 33 Temminck, ' Hist. Nat. Gen.,' &c, torn. ii. p. 125. For Tetrao urogaUus, see L. Lloyd, 'Field Sports of North of Europe,' vol. i. pp. 287, 314 ; and ' Bull, de la Soc. d Acclimat.,' torn, vii., 1860, p. 600. For T. sc ticus, Thompson, 'Nat. Hist, of Ireland,' vol. ii. 1850, p. 49. For T. cupido. ' Boston Journal of Nat. Hist.,' vol. iii. p. 199. 140 STERILITY FROM Chap. XVIII. yet almost all the kinds have frequently produced young in the various European menageries, even the mooruk (Caswirius bennetii) from New Ireland. The African ostrich, though perfectly healthy and living long in the South of France, never lays more than from twelve to fifteen eggs, though in its native country it lays from twenty-five to thirty.54 Here we have another instance of fertility impaired, but not lost, under confinement, as witb the flying squirrel, the hen-pheasant, and two species of American pigeons. Most Waders can be tamed, as the Eev. E. S. Dixon informs me, with remarkable facility ; but several of them are short-lived under confinement, so that their sterility in this state is not surprising. The cranes breed more readily than other genera : Grvs montigresia has bred several times in Paris and in the Zoological Gardens, as has G. cinerea at the latter place, and G. antigone at Calcutta. Of other members of this great order, Tetrapteryx paradisca has bred at Knowsley, a Porphyrio in Sicily, and the Qallinula chloropus in the Zoological Gardens. On the other hand, several birds belonging to this order will not breed in their native country, Jamaica ; and the Psophia, though often kept by the Indians of Guiana about their houses, " is seldom or never known to breed." 55 The members of the great Duck family breed as readily in confinement as do the Columbae and Gallinae ; and this, considering their aquatic and wandering habits, and the nature of their food, could not have been anticipated. Even some time ago above two dozen species had bred in the Zoological Gardens ; and M. Selys- Longchampshas recorded the production of hybrids from forty-four different members of the family ; and to these Professor Newton has added a few more cases.56 " There is not," says Mr. Dixon,57 " in the wide world, a goose which is not in the strict sense of the word domesticable ;" that is, capable of breeding under confinement ; but this statement is probably too bold. The capacity to breed sometimes varies in individuals of the same species; thus Audubon58 kept for more than eight years some wild geese (Anser cawidensis), but they would not mate; whilst other individuals of the same species produced young during the second year. I know of but one instance in the whole family of a species which absolutely refuses to breed in captivity, namely, the Dendrocygna viduata, although, according to Sir R. Schomburgk,59 it is easily tamed, and is frequently kept by the Indians of Guiana. Lastly, with respect 54 Marcel de Serves, 'Annales des Sci. Nat.,' 2nd series, Zoolog., torn, xiii. p. 175. 55 Dr. Hancock, in ' Charlesworth's Mag. of Nat. Hist.,' vol. ii., 1838, p. 49 1 ; R. Hill, < A Week at Port Royal,' p. 8 ; ' Guide to the Zoological Gardens,' by P. L. Sclater, 1859, pp. 11, 12; k The Knowsley Menagerie,' by Dr. Gray, 18t6, pi. xiv. ; E. Blyth, 'Pieport Asiatic Soc. of Bengal,' May 1855. 56 Prof. Newton, in ' Proc. Zoolog. Soc.,' 1860, p. 336. 57 ' The Dovecote and Aviary,' p. 428. 58 'Ornithological Biography,' voL iii. p. 9. 59 ' Geograph. Journal,' toI. xiii., 1844, p. 32. char xvm. CHANGED CONDITIONS. 141 to Gulls, though many have been kept in the Zoological Gardens and in the old Surrey Gardens, no instance was known before the year 1818 of their coupling or breeding; but since that period the herring gull (Larus argentatus) has bred many times in the Zoological Gardens and at Knowsley. There is reason to believe that insects are affected by confinement like the higher animals. It is well known that the Sphingidre rarely breed when thus treated. An entomologist60 in Paris kept twenty-five specimens of Xaturnia pyri, but did not succeed in getting a single fertile egg. A number of females of Orthos/'a munda and of Mamestra suam reared in confinement were unattractive to the males.61 Mr. Newport kept nearly a hundred individuals of two species of Vanessa, but not one paired ; this, however, might have been due to their habit of coupling on the wing.62 Mr. Atkinson could never succeed in India in making the Tarroo silk- moth breed in confinement.63 It appears that a number of moths, especially the Sphingidae, when hatched in the autumn out of their proper season, are completely barren ; but this latter case is still involved in some obscurity.64 Independently of the fact of many animals under confine- ment not coupling, or, if they couple, not producing young, there is evidence of another kind that their sexual functions are disturbed. For many cases have been recorded of the loss by male birds when confined of their characteristic plu- mage. Thus the common linnet (Linota cannabind) when caged does not acquire the fine crimson colour on its breast, and one of the buntings (Emberiza passerina) loses the black on its head. A Pyrrhula and an Oriolus have been observed to assume the quiet plumage of the hen-bird ; and the Falco albidus returned to the dress of an earlier age.65 Mr. Thomp- son, the superintendent of the Knowsley menagerie, informed me that he had often observed analogous facts. The horns of a male deer (Ceruus canadensis) during the voyage from America were badly developed ; but subsequently in Faris perfect horns were produced. 60 Loudon's 'Mag. of Nat. Hist.,' 5764-; and Dr. Wallace, in ' Proc. vol. v., 1832, p. 153. Entomolog. Soc.,' June 4th, 1860, p. 61 'Zoologist,' vols, v.-vi., 1847-48, 119. p. 1660. 65 Yarrell's ' British Birds,' vol. i. 62 ' Transact. Entomolog. Soc.,' vol. p. 506; Bechstein, ' Stubenvogel,' s. iv., 1845, p. 60. 185 ; ' Philosoph. Transact.,' 1772, p. 63 'Transact. Linn. Soc.,' vol. vii. 271. Bronn (' Geschichte der Natur,' p. 40. Band ii. s. 96) has collected a number 64 See an interesting paper by Mr. of cases. For the case of the deer, see Newman, in the 'Zoologist,' 1857, p. ' Penny Cyclop.,' vol. viii. p. 350. 142 STERILITY FROM Chap. XVIII. "When conception takes place under confinement, the young are often born dead, or die soon, or are ill-formed. This frequently occurs in the Zoological Gardens, and, according to Bengger, with native animals confined in Paraguay. The mother's milk often fails. We may also attribute to the dis- turbance of the sexual functions the frequent occurrence of that monstrous instinct which leads the mother to devour her own offspring,— a mysterious case of perversion, as it at first appears. Sufficient evidence has now been advanced to prove that animals when first confined are eminently liable to suffer in their reproductive systems. "We feel at first naturally inclined to attribute the result to loss of health, or at least to loss of vigour ; but this view can hardly be admitted when we reflect how healthy, long-lived, and vigorous many animals are under captivity, such as parrots, and hawks when used for hawking, chetahs when used for hunting, and elephants. The reproductive organs themselves are not diseased ; and the diseases, from which animals in menageries usually perish, are not those which in any way affect their fertility. No domestic animal is more subject to disease than the sheep, yet it is remarkably prolific. The failure of animals to breed under confinement has been sometimes attributed exclusively to a failure in their sexual instincts : this may occasionally come into play, but there is no obvious reason why this instinct should be especially liable to be affected with per- fectly tamed animals, except, indeed, indirectly through the reproductive system itself being disturbed. Moreover, numerous cases have been given of various animals which couple freely under confinement, but never conceive; or, if they conceive and produce young, these are fewer in number than is natural to the species. In the vegetable kingdom instinct of course can play no part ; and we shall presently see that plants when removed from their natural conditions are affected in nearly the same manner as animals. Change of climate cannot be the cause of the loss of fertility, for, whilst many animals imported into Europe from extremely different climates breed freely, many others when confined in their native land are completely sterile. Change of food cannot be Chap. XVIII. CHANGED CONDITIONS. 143 the chief cause; for ostriches, ducks, and many other animals, which must have undergone a great change in this respect, breed freely. Carnivorous birds when confined are extremely- sterile, whilst most carnivorous mammals, except plantigrades, are moderately fertile. Nor can the amount of food be the cause ; for a sufficient supply will certainly be given to valuable animals ; and there is no reason to suppose that much more food would be given to them than to our choice domestic productions which retain their full fertility. Lastly, we may infer from the case of the elephant, chetah, various hawks, and of many animals which are allowed to lead an almost free life in their native land, that want of exercise is not the sole cause. It would appear that any change in the habits of life, what- ever these habits may be, if great enough, tends to affect in an inexplicable manner the powers of reproduction. The result depends more on the constitution of the species than on the nature of the change ; for certain whole groups are affected more than others ; but exceptions always occur, for some species in the most fertile groups refuse to breed, and some in the most sterile groups breed freely. Those animals which usually breed freely under confinement, rarely breed, as I was assured, in the Zoological Gardens, within a year or two after their first importation. When an animal which is generally sterile under confinement happens to breed, the young apparently do not inherit this power : for had this been the case, various quadrupeds and birds, which are valuable for exhibition, Avould have become common. Dr. Broca even affirms 66 that many animals in the Jardin des Plantes, after having produced young for three or four suc- cessive generations, become sterile ; but this may be the result of too close interbreeding. It is a remarkable circum- stance that many mammals and birds have produced hybrids under confinement quite as readily as, or even more leadily than, they have procreated their own kind. Of this fact many instances have been given ; 67 and we are thus reminded of those plants which when cultivated refuse to be fertilised by 66 'Journal de Physiologie,' torn. subject, see F. Cuvier, in ' Annales da ii. p. 347. Mfcseum,' tom. xii. p. 119. 87 For additional evidence on this STERILITY FROM Chat. XVIIL their own pollen, but can easily be fertilised by that of a distinct species. Finally, we must conclude, limited as the conclusion is, that changed conditions of life have an especial power of acting injuriously on the reproductive system. The whole case is quite peculiar, for these organs, though not diseased, are thus rendered incapable of performing their proper functions, or perform them imperfectly. Sterility of Domesticated Animals from cfianged conditions. — With respect to domesticated animals, as their domestication mainly depends on the accident of their breeding freely under captivity, we ought not to expect that their reproductive system would be affected by any moderate degree of change. Those orders of quadrupeds and birds, of which the wild species breed most readily in our menageries, have afforded us the greatest number of domes- ticated productions. Savages in most parts of the world are fond of taming animals;68 and if any of these regularly produced young, and were at the same time useful, they would be at once domesti- cated. If, when their masters migrated into other countries, they were in addition found capable of withstanding various climates, they would be still more valuable; and it appears that the animals which breed readily in captivity can generally withstand different climates. Some few domesticated animals, such as the reindeer and camel, offer an exception to this rule. Many of our domesticated animals can bear with undiminished fertility the most unnatural conditions ; for instance, rabbits, guinea-pigs, and ferrets breed in miserably confined hutches. Few European dogs of any kind withstand the climate of India without degenerating, but as long as they survive, they retain, as I hear from Dr. Falconer, their fertility; so it is, according to Dr. Daniel], with English dogs taken to Sierra Leone. The fowl, a native of the hot jungles of India, becomes more fertile than its parent-stock in every quarter of the world, until we advance as far north as Greenland and Northern Siberia, where this bird will not breed. Both fowls and pigeons, which I received during the autumn direct from Sierra Leone, were at once ready to couple.69 I have, also, seen pigeons 68 Numerous instances could be given. Thus Livingstone ('Travels,' p. 217) states that the King of the Barotse, an inland tribe which never had any communication with white men, was extremely fond of taming animals, and every young antelope was brought to him. Mr. Galton informs Mie that the Damaras are likewise fond of keeping pets. The Indians of South America follow the same habit. Capt. Wilkes states that the Poly- nesians of the Samoan Islands tamed pigeons ; and the New Zealanders, as Mr. Mantell informs me, kept various kinds of birds. 59 For analogous cases with the fowl, see Reaumur, ' L'Art de fairs Eclore,' &&, 1749, p. 243 ; and Cel. Sykes, in 4 Proc. Zoolog. Soc.,' 1832, &c. With respect to the fowl not breeding in northern regions, see Latham's ' Hist, of P>irds,' vol. viii., 1823, p. 169. CHAr. XVIII. CHANGED CONDITIONS. 145 breeding as freely as the common kinds within a year after their importation from the upper Nile. The guinea-fowl, an aboriginal of the hot and dry deserts of Africa, whilst living under our damp and cool climate, produces a large supply of eggs. Nevertheless, our domesticated animals under new conditions occasionally show signs of lessened fertility. Eoulin asserts that in the hot valleys of the equatorial Cordillera sheep are not fully fecund;70 and according to Lord Somerville,71 the merino-sheep which he imported from Spain were not at first perfectly fertile. It is said72 that mares brought up on dry food in the stable, and turned out to grass, do not at first breed. The peahen, as we have seen, is said not to lay so many eggs in England as in India.' It was long before the canary-bird was fully fertile, and even now first- rate breeding birds are not common.73 In the hot and dry province of Delhi, as I hear from Dr. Falconer, the eggs of the turkey, though placed under a hen, are extremely liable to fail. According to Eoulin, geese taken to the lofty plateau of Bogota, at first laid seldom, and then only a few eggs ; of these scarcely a fourth were hatched, and half the young birds died ; in the second generation they were more fertile; and when Eoulin wrote they were becoming as fertile as our geese in Europe. With respect to the valley of Quito, Mr. Orton says:74 "the only geese in the valley are a few imported from Europe, and these refuse to propagate." In the Philippine Archipelago the goose, it is asserted, will not breed or even lay eggs.75 A more curious case is that of the fowl, which, accord- ing to Eoulin, when first introduced would not breed at Cusco in Bolivia, but subsequently became quite fertile ; and the English Game fowl, lately introduced, had not as yet arrived at its full fertility, for to raise two or three chickens irom a nest of eggs was thought fortunate. In Europe close confinement has a marked effect on the fertility of the fowl : it has been found in France that with fowls allowed considerable freedom only twenty per cent, of the eggs failed ; when allowed less freedom forty per cent, failed ; and in close con- finement sixty out of the hundred were not hatched.76 So we see that unnatural and changed conditions of life produce some effect on the fertility of our most thoroughly domesticated animals, in the same manner, though in a far less degree, as with captive wild animals. It is by no means rare to find certain males and females which will not breed together, though both are known to be perfectly fertile with other males and females. "We have no reason to suppose that this is caused by these animals having been subjected to any change in their habits of life ; therefore such cases are hardly related to our present subject. The cause apparently lies in an innate sexual in* 70 " Mem. par divers Savans," 'Acad, des Sciences,' torn, vi., 183-5, p. 347. 71 Youatt on Sheep, p. 181. 72 J. Mills, 'Treatise on Cattle,' 1776, p. 72. 73 Bechstein, ' Stubenvogel,' s. 242. 74 'The Andes and the Amazon,' 1870, p. 107. 75 Crawfurd's ' Descriptive Diet, of the Indian Islands,' 1856, p. 145. 76 ' Bull, de la Soc. d'Acclimat.,' tom. ix., 1862, pp. 380, 384. 14(3 STERILITY FROM Ciiap. XVIII. compatibility of the pair which are matched. Several instances have been communicated to me by Mr. W. C. Spooner (well known for his essay on Cross-breeding), by Mr. Eyton of Eyton, by Mr. Wicksted and other breeders, and especially by Mr. Waring of Chelsfield, in relation to horses, cattle, pigs, foxhounds, other dogs, and pigeons.77 In these cases, females, which either previously or subsequently were proved to be fertile, failed to breed with certain males, with whom it was particularly desired to match them. A change in the con- stitution of the female may sometimes have occurred before she was put to the second male ; but in other cases this explanation is hardly tenable, for a female, known not to be barren, has been unsuccessfully paired seven or eight times with the same male likewise known to be perfectly fertile. With cart-mares, which sometimes will not breed with stallions of pure blood, but subsequently have bred with cart- stallions, Mr. Spooner is inclined to attribute the failure to the lesser sexual power of the race-horse. But I have heard from the greatest breeder of race-horses at the present day, through Mr. Waring, that " it frequently occurs with a mare to be put several times during " one or two seasons to a particular stallion of acknowledged power, " and yet prove barren ; the mare afterwards breeding at once with " some other horse." These facts are worth recording, as they show, like so many previous facts, on what slight constitutional differences the fertility of an animal often depends. Sterility of Plants from changed Conditions of Life, and from other causes. In the vegetable kingdom cases of sterility frequently occur, analogous with those previously given in the animal kingdom. But the subject is obscured by several circum- stances, presently to be discussed, namely, the contabescence of the anthers, as Gartner has named a certain affection — monstrosities — doubleness of the flower— much-enlarged fruit — and long -continued or excessive propagation by buds. It is notorious tha*- many plants in our gardens and hot-houses, though preserved in the most perfect health, rarely or never pro- duce seed. I do not allude to plants which run to leaves, from being kept too damp, or too warm, or too much manured ; for these do not flower, and the case may be wholly different. Nor do I allude to fruit not ripening from want of heat or rotting from too much moisture. But many exotic plants, with their ovules and pollen appearing perfectly sound, will not set any seed. The sterility in many cases, as I know from my own observation, is simply due to the absence of the proper insects for carrying the pollen to the stigma. But after excluding the several cases just 77 For pigeons, see Dr. Chapuis, ' Le Pigeon Voyageuv Beige,' 1865, p. 66. Chai>. XVIIL CHANGED CONDITIONS. 117 specified, there are many plants in which the reproductive system has been seriously affected by the altered conditions of life to which they have been subjected. It would be tedious to enter on many details. Linnaeus long ago observed78 that Alpine plants, although naturally loaded with seed, produce either few or none when cultivated in gardens. But exceptions often occur : the Draba sylvestns, one of our most thoroughly Alpine plants, multiplies itself by seed in Mr. H. C. "Watson's garden, near London ; and Kerner, who has particularly attended to the cultivation of Alpine plants, found that various kinds, when cultivated, spontaneously sowed themselves.79 Many plants which naturally grow in peat-earth are entirely sterile in our gardens. I have noticed the same fact with several liliaceous plants, which nevertheless grew vigorously. Too much manure renders some kinds utterly sterile, as I have myself observed. The tendency to sterility from this cause runs in families ; thus, according to Gartner,80 it is, hardly possible to give too much manure to most Gramineae, Cruciferae, and Legu- minosae, whilst succulent and bulbous-rooted plants are easily affected. Extreme poverty of soil is less apt to induce sterility ; but dwarfed plants of Trifolium minus and repens, growing on a lawn often mown and never manured, were found by me not to produce any seed. The temperature of the soil, and the season at which plants are watered, often have a marked effect on their fertility, as was observed by Kolreuter in the case of Mirabilis.81 Mr. Scott, in the Botanic Gardens of Edinburgh, observed that {^iridium divaricatum would not set seed when grown in a basket in which it throve, but was capable of fertilisation in a pot where it was a little damper. Pelargonium fulgidum, for many years after its introduction, seeded freely; it then became sterile; now it is fertile 82 if kept in a dry stove during the winter. Other varieties of pelargonium are sterile and others fertile without our being able to assign any cause. Very slight changes in the position of a plant, whether planted on a bank or at its base, sometimes make all the difference in its producing seed. Temperature apparently has a much more powerful influence on the fertility of plants than on that of animals. Nevertheless it is wonderful what changes some few plants will withstand with undiminished fertility : thus the Zephyranthes Candida, a native of the moderately warm banks of the Plata, sows itself in the hot dry country near Lima, and in Yorkshire 78 'Swedish Acts,' vol. i., 1739, p. 3. Pallas makes the same remark in his ' Travels ' (Eng. translat.), vol. i. p. 292. 79 A. Kerner, ' Die Cultur der Al- penpflanzen,' 1864, s. 139; Watson's 'Cybele Britannica,' vol. i. p. 131; Mr. D. Cameron, aiso, has written on the culture of Alpine plants in '■ Gard. Chronicle,' 1848, pp. 253, 268. and mentions a few which seed. so 4 Beitrage zur Kenntniss der Befruchtung/ 1844, s. 333. 81 'Nova Acta Petrop.,' 1793, p. 391. 82 ' Cottage Gardener,' 1856, pp 44, 109. 148 STEKILITY FROM CHANGED CONDITIONS. Chap. XVIII. resists the severest frosts, and I have seen seeds gathered from pods which had been covered with snow during three weeks.83 Berberis wallichii, from the hot Khasia range in India, is uninjured by our sharpest frosts, and ripens its fruit under our cool summers. Nevertheless, I presume we must attribute to change of climate the sterility of many foreign plants ; thus, the Persian and Chinese lilacs (Syringa persica and chinensis), though perfectly hardy here, never produce a seed ; the common lilac (>S\ vulgaris) seeds with us moderately well, but in parts of Germany the capsules never contain seed.84 Some few of the cases, given in the last chapter, of self-impotent plants, might have been here introduced, as their state seems due to the conditions to which they have been subjected. The liability of plants to be affected in their fertility by slightly changed conditions is the more remarkable, as the pollen when once in process of formation is not easily injured ; a plant may be transplanted, or a branch with flower-buds be cut off and placed in water, and the pollen will be matured. Pollen, also, when once mature, may be kept for weeks or even months.85 The female organs are more sensitive, for Gartner 8fi found that dicotyledonous plants, when carefully removed so that they did not in the least flag, could seldom be fertilised ; this occurred even with potted plants if the roots had grown out of the hole at the bottom. In some few cases, however, as with Digitalis, transplantation did not prevent fertilisation; and according to the testimony of Mawz, Brassica rapa, when pulled up by its roots and placed in water, ripened its seed. Flower-stems of several monocotyledonous plants when cut off and placed in water likewise produce seed. But in these cases I presume that the flowers had been already fertilised, for Herbert 87 found with the Crocus that the plants might be re- moved or mutilated after the act of fertilisation, and would still perfect their seeds; but that, if transplanted before being fertilised, the application of pollen was powerless. Plants which have been long cultivated can generally endure with undiminished fertility various and great changes ; but not in most cases so great a change of climate as domesticated animals. It is remarkable that many plants under these circumstances are so much affected that the proportion and the nature of their che- mical ingredients are modified, yet their fertility is unimpaired. Thus, as Dr. Falconer informs me, there is a great difference in the character of the fibre in hemp, in the quantity of oil in the seed of 83 Dr. Herbert, ' Amaryllidacea?,' p. 176. 84 Gartner, ' Beitrage zur Kennt- niss,' &c, s. 560, 564. 85 ' Gardener's Chronicle,' 1844, p. 215; 1850, p. 470. Faivre gives a good resume on this subject in his ' La Variability des Especes,' 1868, p. 155. 86 1 Beitrage zur Kenntniss,' &c, s. 252, 333. 87 ' Journal of Hort. Soc.,' vol. ii., 1817, p. 83. Chap. XVIII CONTABESCENCE. 149 the Linum, in the proportion of narcotin to morphine in the poppy, in gluten to starch in wheat, when these plants are cultivated on the plains and on the mountains of India ; nevertheless, they all remain fully fertile. Contabescence. — Gartner has designated by this term a peculiar condition of the anthers in certain plants, in which they are shri- velled, or become brown and tough, and contain no good pollen. When in this state they exactly resemble the anthers of the most sterile hybrids. Gartner,88 in his discussion on this subject, has shown that plants of many orders are occasionally thus alfected ; but the Caryophyllaceoe and Liliaceae suffer most, and to these orders, I think, the Ericaceae may be added. Contabescence varies in degree, but on the same plant all the flowers are generally affected to nearly the same extent. The anthers are affected at a very early period in the flower-bud, and remain in the same state (with one recorded exception) during the life of the plant. The affection cannot be cured by any change of treatment, and is propagated by layers, cuttings, &c, and perhaps even by seed. In contabescent plants the female organs are seldom affected, or merely become precocious in their development. The cause of this affection Ij doubtful, and is different in differeni cases. Until I read Gartner's discussion I attributed it, as apparently did Herbert, to the un- natural treatment of the plants ; but its permanence under changed conditions, and the female organs not being affected, seem incom- patible with this view. The fact of several endemic plants be- coming contabescent in our gardens seems, at first sight, equally incompatible with this view ; but Kolreuter believes that this is the result of their transplantation. The contabescent plants of Dianthus and Verbascum, found wild by Wiegmann, grew on a dry and sterile bank. The fact that exotic plants are eminently liable to this affection also seems to show that it is in some manner caused by their unnatural treatment. In some instances, as with Silene, Gartner's view seems the most probable, namely, that it is caused by an inherent tendency in the species to become dioecious. I can add another cause, namely, the illegitimate unions of hetero- styled plants, for I have observed seedlings of three species of Primula and of Ly thrum salicaria, which had been raised from plants illegitimately fertilised by their own-form pollen, with some or all their anthers in a contabescent state. There is perhaps an additional cause, namely, self-fertilisation ; for many plants of Dianthus and Lobelia, which had been raised from self-fertilised seeds, had their anthers in this state ; but these instances are not conclusive, as both genera are liable from other causes to this affection. Cases of an opposite nature likewise occur, namely, plants with 83 1 Beitrage zur Kenntniss,' &c, s. 117 et seq. ; Kolreuter, 'Zweite Fort- setzung,' s. 10, 121; ' Dritte Fort- setzung,' s. 57. Herbert, ' Amarylli- daceae,' p. 355. Wiegmann, 1 Ueber die Bastarderzeugung,' s. 27. 150 STERILITY. Chat. XVIII. the female organs struck with sterility, whilst the male organs remain perfect. Dianthus jajonims, a Passi flora, and Nicotiana, have been described by Gartner s9 as being in this unusual con- dition. Monstrosities as a cause of sterility. — Great deviations of structure, even when the reproductive organs themselves are not seriously affected, sometimes cause plants to become sterile. But in other cases plants may become monstrous to an extreme degree and yet retain their full fertility. Gallesio, who certainly had great ex- perience,90 often attributes sterility to this cause; but it may be suspected that in some of his cases sterility was the cause, and not the result, of the monstrous growths. The curious St. Valery apple, although it bears fruit, rarely produces seed. The wonderfully anomalous flowers of Begonia frigida, formerly described, though, they appear fit for fructification, are sterile.91 Species of PrimuLi in which the calyx is brightly coloured are said92 to be often sterile, though I have known them to be fertile. On the other hand, Verlot gives several ca«es of proliferous flowers which can be pro- pagated by seed. This was the case with a poppy, which had become monopetalous by the union of its petals.93 Another extra- ordinary poppy, with the stamens replaced by numerous small supplementary capsules, likewise reproduces itself by seed. This has also occurred with a plant of Saxifraga geum, in which a series of adventitious carpels, bearing ovules on their margins, had been developed between the stamens and the normal carpels.94 Lastly, with respect to peloric flowers, which depart wonderfully from the natural structure, — those of Lin-aria vulgaris seem generally to be more or less sterile, whilst those before described of Antirrhinum muju.% when artificially fertilised with their own pollen, are perfectly fertile, though sterile when left to themselves, for bees are unable to crawl into the narrow tubular flower. The peloric flowers of Oorydalis solida, according to Godron,95 are sometimes barren and sometimes fertile; whilst those of Gloxinia are well known to yield plenty of seed. In our greenhouse Pelargoniums, the central flower of the truss is often peloric, and Mr. Masters informs me that he tried in vain during several years to get seed from these flowers. I likewise made many vain attempts, but some- times succeeded in fertilising them with pollen from a normal 89 1 Bastarderzeugung,' s. 356. 90 'Teoria delia Kiproduzione,' 1816, p. 8±; 'Traite du Citrus,' 1811, p. 67. 91 Mr. C. W. Crocker, in 'Card. Chronicle,' 1861, p. 1092. 92 Verlot, 4 Des Varietes,' 1865, p. 80. 93 Verlot, ibid., p. 88. 94 Prof. Allman, Brit. Assoc., quoted in the ' Phytologist,' vol. ii. p. 483. Prof. Harvey, on the autho- rity of Mr. Andrews, who discovered the plant, informed me that this monstrosity could be propagated bv seed. With respect to the poppy, sea Prof. Goeppert, as quoted in '.Journal of Horticulture,' July 1st, 1863, p. 171. 95 'Comptes Pendus,* Dec. 19th, 1864-, p. 1039. Chai-. XVi.I. DOUBLE FLOWERS. 151 flower of another variety ; and conversely I several times fertilised ordinary flowers with peloric pollen. Only once I succeeded in raising a plant from a peloric flower fertilised by pollen from a peloric flower borne by another variety ; but the plant, it may be added, presented nothing particular in its structure. Hence we may conclude that no general rule can be laid down; but any great deviation from the normal structure, even when the repro- ductive organs themselves are not seriously affected, certainly often leads to sexual impotence. Double Flowers. — When the stamens are converted into petals, the plant becomes on the male side sterile ; when both stamens and pistils are thus changed, the plant becomes completely barren. Symmetrical flowers having numerous stamens and petals are the most liable to become double, as perhaps follows from all multiple organs being the most subject to variability. But flowers furnished with only a few stamens, and others which are asymmetrical in structure, sometimes become double, as we see with the double gorse or Ulex, and Antirrhinum. The Composite bear what are called double flowers by the abnormal development of the corolla of their central florets. Doubleness is sometimes connected with prolification,96 or the continued growth of the axis of the flower. Doubleness is strongly inherited. No one has produced, as Lindley remarks,97 double flowers by promoting the perfect health of the plant. On the contrary, unnatural conditions of life favour their production. There is some reason to believe that seeds kept during many years, and seeds believed to be imperfectly fertilised, yield double flowers more freely than fresh and perfectly fertilised seed.98 Long-continued cultivation in rich soil seems to be the commonest exciting cause. A double narcissus and a double Anthemis nobilis, transplanted into very poor soil, has been observed to become single;99 and I have seen a completely double white primrose rendered permanently single by being divided and transplanted whilst in full flower. It has been observed by Profes-sor E. Morren that doubleness of the flowers and variegation of the leaves are antagonistic states ; but so many exceptions to the rule have lately been recorded,100 that, though general, it cannot be looked at as invariable. Variegation seems generally to result from a feeble or atrophied condition of the plant, and a large proportion of the seedlings raised from parents, if both are variegated, usually perish at an early age ; hence we may perhaps infer that doubleness, which is 9G 1 Gardener's Chronicle,' 1866, p. 681. 97 ' Theory of Horticulture,' p. 333. 98 Mr. Fairweather, in 4 Transact. Hort. Soc.,' vol. iii. p. 406 : Bosse, quoted by Bronn, 'Geschichte der Natur,' B. ii. s. 77. On the effects of the removal of the anthers, see Mr. Leitner, in Silliman's ' North Ameri- can Journ. of Science,' vol. xxiii. p. 47 ; and Verlot, ' Des Varietes,' 186.">, p. 84. 99 Lindley's ' Theory of Horticul- ture,' p. 3 3. 100 ' Gardener's Chronicle,' 1865, p. 626; 1866, pp.290, 730; and Verlot, ' Des Varietes,' p. 75. 152 STERILITY FROM THE DEVELOPMENT Chap. XVIII. the antagonistic state, commonly arises from a plethoric condition. On the other hand, extremely poor soil sometimes, though rarely, appears to cause doubleness : I formerly described 101 some completely double, bud-like, flowers produced in large numbers by stunted wild plants of Gentiana amarella growing on a poor chalky bank. I have also noticed a distinct tendency to doubleness in the flowers of a Eanunculus, Horse-chestnut, and Bladder-nut {Ranunculus repens, /Esculus pavia, and Staphylea), growing under very unfavourable conditions. Professor Lehmann 102 found several wild plants growing near a hot spring with double flowers. With respect to the cause of doubleness, which arises, as we see, under widely different circum- stances, I shall presently attempt to show that the most probable view is that unnatural conditions first give a tendency to sterility, and that then, on the principle of compensation, as the reproductive organs do not perform their proper functions, they either become developed into petals, or additional petals are formed. This view has lately been supported by Mr. Laxton,103 who advances the case of some common peas, which, after long-continued heavy rain, flowered a second time, and produced double flowers. Seedless Fruit. — Many of our most valuable fruits, although con- sisting in a homological sense of widely different organs, are either quite sterile, or produce extremely few seeds. This is notoriously the case with our best pears, grapes, and figs, with the pine-apple, banana, bread-fruit, pomegranate, azarole, date-palms, and some members of the orange-tribe. Poorer varieties of these same fruits either habitually or occasionally yield seed.104 Most horticulturists look atthe great size and anomalous development of the fruit as the cause, and sterility as the result ; but the opposite view, as we shall presently see, is more probable. Sterility from the excessive development of the organs of Growth or Vegetation. — Plants which from any cause grow too luxuriantly, and produce leaves, stems, runners, suckers, tubers, bulbs, &c, in excess, sometimes do not flower, or if they flower do not yield seed. To make European vegetables under the hot climate of India yield seed, it is necessary to check their growth ; and, when ODe-third grown, they are taken up, and their stems and tap-roots are cut or 101 < Gardener's Chronicle,' 1843, p. 628. In this article I suggested the theory above given on the doubleness of flowers. This view is adopted by Carriere, 1 Production et Fix. des Varices,' 1865, p. 67. 102 Quoted by Gartner, ' Bastarder- zeugung,' s. 567. 103 ' Gardener's Chronicle,' 1866, p. 901. 104 Lindley, 1 Theory of Horticul- ture,' pp. 175-179 ; Godron, ' De l'Es- pece/ torn. ii. p. 106 ; Pickering, 4 Races of Man ; ' Gallesio, ' Teoria della Riproduzione,' 1816, pp.101-1 10. Meyen (' Reise um Erde,' Th. ii. s. 214) states that at Manilla one variety of the banana is full of seeds : and Chamisso (Hooker's ' Bot. Misc.,' vol. i. p. 310) describes a variety of the bread-fruit in the Mariana Islands with small fruit, containing seeds which are frequently perfect. Burnes. in his ' Travels in Bokhara,' remarks on the pomegranate seeding in Mazen- deran, as a remarkable peculiarity. GOAF. XVIII. OF THE ORGANS OF VEGETATION. 153 mutilated.103 So it is with hybrids ; for instance, Prof. Lecoq 105 had three plants of Mirabilis, which, though they grew luxuriantly and flowered, were quite sterile ; but after beating one with a stick until a few branches alone were left, these at once yielded good seed. The sugar-cane, which grows vigorously and produces a large supply of succulent stems, never, according to various observers, bears seed in the West Indies, Malaga, India, Cochin China, Mauritius, or the Malay Archipelago.107 Plants which produce a large number of tubers are apt to be sterile, as occurs, to a certain extent, with the common potato; and Mr. Fortune informs me that the sweet potato (Convolvulus batatas) in China never, as far as he has seen, yields seed. Dr. Eoyle remarks 108 that in India the Agave vivipara, when grown in rich soil, invariably produces bulbs, but no seeds ; whilst a poor soil and dry climate lead to an opposite result. In China, according to Mr. Fortune, an extraordinary number of little bulbs are developed in the axils of the leaves of the yam, and this plant does not bear seed. Whether in these cases, as in those of double flowers and seedless fruit, sexual sterility from changed conditions of life is the primary cause which leads to the excessive development of the organs of vegetation, is doubtful ; though some evidence might be advanced in favour of this view. It is perhaps a more probable view that plants which propagate themselves largely by one method, namely by buds, have not sufficient vital power or organised matter for the other method of sexual generation. Several distinguished botanists and good practical judges believe that long-continued propagation by cuttings, runners, tubers, bulbs, &c, independently of any excessive development of these parts, is the cause of many plants failing to produce flowers, or producing only barren flowers, — it is as if they had lost the habit of sexual generation.109 That many plants when thus propagated are sterile there can be no doubt, but as to whether the long continuance of this form of propagation is the actual cause of their sterility, I will not venture, from the want of sufficient evidence, to express an opinion. That plants may be propagated for long periods by buds, without the aid of sexual generation, we may safely infer from this being the case with many plants which must have long survived in a state of nature. As I have had occasion before to allude to this subject, I will here give such cases as I have collected. Many alpine plants 10i Ingledew, ia ' Transact, of Agri- cult, and Hort. Soc. of India,' vol. ii. 106 'De la Fecondation,' 1862, p. 308. 107 Hooker's ' Bot. Misc.,' vol. i. p. 99; Gallesio, 'Teoria della Ripro- duzione,'p. 110. Dr. J. de Cordemoy, in 'Transact, of the R. Soc. of Mauri- tius' (new series), vol. vi. 1873, pp. 60-67, gives a large number of cases of plants which never seed, including several species indigenous in Mauri- tius. los 'Transact. Linn. Soc.,' vol. xvii. p. 563. 109 Gcdron, 1 De l'Espece,' torn. ii. p. 106 ; Herbert on Crocus, in ' Jour- nal of Hort. Soc.,' vol. i., 1846, p. 254 : Dr. Wight, from what he has seen in India, believes in this view ; ' Madras Journal of Lit. and Science,' vol. iv., 1836, p. 61. 154 STERILITY. Ciiai\ XVIII ascend mountains beyond the height at which they can produce seed110 Certain species of Poa and Festuca, when growing on mountain-pastures, propagate themselves, as I hear from Mr. Bentham. almost exclusively by bulblets. Kalm gives a more curious instance111 of several American trees, which grow so plentifully in marshes or in thick woods, that they are certainly well adapted for these stations, yet scarcely ever produce seeds ; but when acciden- tally growing on the outside of the marsh or wood, are loaded with seed. The common ivy is found in Northern Sweden and Russia, but flowers and fruits only in the southern provinces. The Acorus calamus extends over a large portion of the globe, but so rarely perfects fruit that this has been seen only by a few botanists; according to Caspary, all its pollen-grains are in a worthless condi- tion.112 The Hypericum calycinum, which propagates itself so freely in our shrubberies by rhizomes, and is naturalised in Ireland, blossoms profusely, but rarely sets any seed, and this only during certain years; nor did it set any when fertilised in my garden by pollen from plants growing at a distance. The Lysimachia nummu- larii, which is furnished with long runners, so seldom produces seed-capsulcs, that Prof. Decaisne,113 who has especially attended to this plant, has never seen it in fruit. The Curex rigida often fails to perfect its seed in Scotland, Lapland, Greenland, Germany, and New Hampshire in the United States.114 The periwinkle ( i 'inca minor), which spreads largely by runners, is said scarcely ever to produce fruit in England ; 115 but this plant requires insect-aid for its fertilisation, and the proper insects may be absent or rare. The Jussioeo gmndi flora has become naturalised in Southern France, and has spread by its rhizomes so extensively as to impede the naviga- tion of the waters, but never produces fertile seed.116 The horse- radish (' 'orhlearia armuracia) spreads pertinaciously and is natural- ised in various parts of Europe ; though it bears flowers, these rarely produce capsules : Professor Caspary informs me that he has watched this plant since 1851, but has never seen its fruit; 65 per cent, of its pollen-grains are bad. The common Han unculus ficaria rarely bears seed in England, France, or Switzerland; but in 1863 I observed seeds on several plants growing near my house.117 Other 110 Wahlenberg specifies eight species in this state on the Lapland Alps : see Appendix to Linnaeus' 'Tour in Lapland,' translated by Sir J. E. Smith, vol. ii. pp. 274-280. 111 'Travels in North America,' Eng. translat., vol. iii. p. 175. 112 With respect to the ivy and Acorus, see Dr. Bromfield in the ' Phy- tologist,' vol, iii. p. 376. Also Lind- ley and Vaucher on the Acorus, and see Caspary as below. 113 'Annal.des Sc. Nat.,' 3rd series, Zool., torn. iv. p. 280. Prof. Decaisne refers also to analogous cases with mosses and lichens near Paris. 114 Mr. Tuckermann, in Silliman's ' American Journal of Science,' vol. xlv. p. 1. 115 Sir J. E. Smith, ' English Flora,' vol. i. p. 339. 116 G. Planchcn, 'Flora de Mont- pellier,' 1864, p. 20. 117 On the non-production of seeds in England, see Mr. Crocker, in ' Gar- dener's Weekly Magazine,' 1852, p. Chap. XVIII. STERILITY. 155 cases analogous with the foregoing could be given; for instance, some kinds of mosses and lichens have never been seen to fructify in France. Some of these endemic and naturalised plants are probably rendered sterile from excessive multiplication by buds, and their consequent incapacity to produce and nourish seed. But the sterility of others more probably depends on the peculiar condi- tions under which they live, as in the case of the ivy in the northern parts of Europe, and of the trees in the swamps of the United States; yet these plants must be in some respects eminently well adapted for the stations which they occupy, for they hold their places against a host of competitors. Finally, the high degree of sterility which often accom- panies the doubling of flowers, or an excessive development of fruit, seldom supervenes at once. An incipient tendency is observed, and continued selection completes the result. The view which seems the most probable, and which connects together all the foregoing facts and brings them within our present subject, is, that changed and unnatural conditions of life first give a tendency to sterility ; and in consequence of this, the organs of reproduction being no longer able fully to perform their proper functions, a supply of organised matter, not required for the development of the seed, flows either into these organs and renders them, foliaeeous, or into the fruit, stems, tubers, &c, increasing their size and succulency. But it is probable that there exists, independently of any incipient sterility, an antagonism between the two forms of repro- duction, namely, by seed and buds, when either is carried to an extreme degree. That incipient sterility plays an impor- tant part in the doubling of nowers, and in the other cases just specified, I infer chiefly from the following facts. When fertility is lost from a wholly different cause, namely, from hybridism, there is a strong tendency, as Gartner118 affirms, 70; Vaucher, 'Hist. Phys. Plantes phar,'" Abhand. Naturw.Gesellsch. zu d'Europe,' torn. i. p. 33; Lecoq, 'Geo- Hall ■,' B. xi. 1870, p. 40, 78. graph. Bot. d'Europe,' torn. iv. p. 118 ' Bastarderzeugung,' s. 565 46(3; Dr. D. Clos, in ' Annal. des Sc. Kolreuter (Dritte Fortsetzung, s. Nat.,' 3rd series, Bot., torn, xvii., 73, 87, 119) also shows that when 1852, p. 129: this latter author refers two species, one single and the other to other analogous cases. See more double, are crossed, the hybrids are especially on this plant, and on other apt to be extremely double, allied cases, Prof. Caspary, " Die Nu- 156 STERILITY. Chap. XVIII. for flowers to become double, and this tendency is inherited. Moreover, it is notorious that with hybrids the male organs become sterile before the female organs, and with double flowers the stamens first become foliaceous. This latter fact is well shown by the male flowers of dioecious plants, which, according to Gallesio,119 first become double. Again, Gart- ner 120 often insists that the flowers of even utterly sterile hybrids, which do not produce any seed, generally yield perfect capsules or fruit,— a fact which has likewise been repeatedly observed by Naudin with the Cucurbitaceae ; so that the production of fruit by plants rendered sterile through any cause is intelligible. Kolreuter has also expressed his unbounded astonishment at the size and development of the tubers in certain hybrids; and all experimentalists 121 have remarked on the strong tendency in hybrids to increase by roots, runners, and suckers. Seeing that hybrid plants, which from their nature are more or less sterile, thus tend to produce double flowers ; that they have the parts including the seed, that is the fruit, perfectly developed, even when containing no seed ; that they sometimes yield gigantic roots ; that they almost invariably tend to increase largely by suckers and other such means ; — seeing this, and knowing, from the many facts given in the earlier parts of this chapter, that almost all organic beings when exposed to unnatural conditions tend to become more or less sterile, it seems much the most probable view that with cultivated plants sterility is the exciting cause, and double flowers, rich seedless fruit, and in some cases largely-developed organs of vegetation, dec., are the indirect results — these results having been in most cases largely increased through continued selection by man. 119 'Teoria della Riproduzione 120 ' Bastarderzeugung,' s. 573. Veg.,' 1816, p. 73. 181 Ibid., s. 527. Chap. XIX. SUMMARY OF THE FOUR LAST CHAPTERS. 157 CHAPTER XIX. SUMMARY OF THE FOUR LAST CHAPTERS, WITH REMARKS ON HYBRIDISM. ON THE EFFECTS OF CROSSING — THE INFLUENCE OF DOMESTICATION ON FERTILITY — CLOSE INTERBREEDING — GOOD AND EVIL RESULTS FROM CHANGED CONDITIONS OF LIFE — VARIETIES "WHEN CROSSED NOT IN- VARIABLY FERTILE ON THE DIFFERENCE IN FERTILITY BETWEEN CROSSED SPECIES AND VARIETIES — CONCLUSIONS "WITH RESPECT TO HYBRIDISM — LIGHT THROWN ON HYBRIDISM BY THE ILLEGITIMATE PROGENY OF HETEROSTYLED PLANTS — STERILITY OF CROSSED SPECIES DUE TO DIFFERENCES CONFINED TO THE REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEM — NOT ACCUMULATED THROUGH NATURAL SELECTION — REASONS WHY DOMESTIC VARIETIES ARE NOT MUTUALLY STERILE — TOO MUCH STRESS HAS BEEN LAID ON THE DIFFERENCE IN FERTILITY BETWEEN CROSSED SPECIES AND CROSSED VARIETIES — CONCLUSION. It was shown in the fifteenth chapter that when individuals of the same variety, or even of a distinct variety, are allowed freely to intercross, uniformity of character is ultimately ac- quired. Some few characters, however, are incapable of fusion, but these are unimportant, as they are often of a semi-monstrous nature, and have suddenly appeared. Hence, to preserve our domesticated breeds true, or to improve them by methodical selection, it is obviously necessary that they should be kept separate. Nevertheless, a whole body of individuals may be slowly modified, through unconscious selection, as we shall see in a future chapter, without separa- ting them into distinct lots. Domestic races have often been intentionally modified by one or two crosses, made with some allied race, and occasionally even by repeated crosses with very distinct races ; but in almost all such cases, long-con- tinued and careful selection has been absolutely necessary, owing to the excessive variability of the crossed offspring, due to the principle of reversion. In a few instances, how- ever, mongrels have retained a uniform character from their first production. When two varieties are allowed to cross freely, and one is 29 158 SUMMARY OF THE Chap. XIX. much more numerous than the other, the former will ulti- mately absorb the latter. Should both varieties exist in nearly equal numbers, it is probable that a considerable period would elapse before the acquirement of a uniform character ; and the character ultimately acquired would largely depend on prepotency of transmission and on the con- ditions of life ; for the nature of these conditions would generally favour one variety more than another, so that a kind of natural selection would come into play. Unless the crossed offspring were slaughtered by man without the least discri- mination, some degree of unmethodical selection would like- wise come into action. From these several considerations we may infer, that when two or more closely allied species first came into the possession of the same tribe, their crossing will not have influenced, in so great a degree as has often been supposed, the character of the offspring in future times ; although in some cases it probably has had a considerable effect. Domestication, as a general rule, increases the proliflcness of animals and plants. It eliminates the tendency to sterility which is common to species when first taken from a state of nature and crossed. On this latter head we have no direct evidence ; but as our races of dogs, cattle, pigs, &c, are almost certainly descended from aboriginally distinct stocks, and as these races are now fully fertile together, or at least incom- parably more fertile than most species when crossed, we may with entire confidence accept this conclusion. Abundant evidence has been given that crossing adds to the size, vigour, and fertility of the offspring. This holds good when there has been no previous close interbreeding. It applies to the individuals of the same variety but belonging to different families, to distinct varieties, sub-species, and even to species. In the latter case, though size is gained, fertility is lost ; but the increased size, vigour, and hardiness of many lrybrids cannot be accounted for solely on the principle of compensation from the inaction of the reproduc- tive s}Tstem. Certain plants whilst growing under their natural conditions, others when cultivated, and others of hybrid origin, are completely self-impotent, though per- Chap. XIX. FOUR LAST CHAPTERS. 159 fectly healthy ; and such plants can be stimulated to fertility only by being crossed with other individuals of the same or of a distinct species. On the other hand, long-continued close interbreeding between the nearest relations diminishes the constitutional vigour, size, and fertility of the offspring ; and occasionally leads to malformations, but not necessarily to general de- terioration of form or structure. This failure of fertility shows that the evil results of interbreeding are independent of the augmentation of morbid tendencies common to both parents, though this augmentation no doubt is often highly injurious. Our belief that evil follows from close interbreed- ing rests to a certain extent on the experience of practical breeders, especially of those who have reared many animals of quickly propagating kinds ; but it likewise rests on several carefully recorded experiments. With some animals close interbreeding may be carried on for a long period with im- punity by the selection of the most vigorous and healthy individuals ; but sooner or later evil follows. The evil, how- ever, comes on so slowly and gradually that it easily escapes observation, but can be recognised by the almost instantaneous manner in which size, constitutional vigour, and fertility are regained when animals that have long been interbred are crossed with a distinct family. These two great classes of facts, namely, the good derived from crossing, and the evil from close interbreeding, with the consideration of the innumerable adaptations throughout nature for compelling, or favouring, or at least permitting, the occasional union of distinct individuals, taken together, lead to the conclusion that it is a law of nature that organic beings shall not fertilise themselves for perpetuity. This law was first plainly hinted at in 1799, with respect to plants, by Andrew Knight,1 and, not long afterwards, that sagacious 1 ' Transactions Phil. Soc.,' 1799, observer failed to understand the full p. 202. For Kolreuter, see ' Mem. de meaning of the structure of the l'Acad. de St.-Petersbourg,' torn. iii. flowers which he has so well de- 1809 (published 1811), p. 197. In scribed, from not always having reading C. K. Sprengel's remarkable before his mind the key to the pro- work, 'Das entdeckte Geheimniss,' blem, namely, the good derived from &c, 1793, it is curious to observe the crossing of distinct individual how often this wonderfully acute plants. 160 SUMMARY OF THE Chap. XIX. observer Kolreuter, after showing how well the Malvaceae are adapted for crossing, asks, " an id aliquid in recessu habeat, quod hujuscemodi flores nunquam proprio sno pul- vere, sed semper eo aliarum suae speciei impregnentur, merito quaeritur? Certe natura nil facit frustra." Although we may demur to Kolreuter's saying that nature does nothing in vain, seeing how many rudimentary and useless organs there are, yet undoubtedly the argument from the innumer- able contrivances, which favour crossing, is of the greatest weight. The most important result of this law is that it leads to uniformity of character in the individuals of the same species. In the case of certain hermaphrodites, which probably intercross only at long intervals of time, and with unisexual animals inhabiting somewhat separated localities, which can only occasionally come into contact and pair, the greater vigour and fertility of the crossed offspring will ultimately tend to give uniformity of character. But when we go beyond the limits of the same species, free intercrossing is barred by the law of sterility. In searching for facts which might throw light on the cause of the good effects from crossing, and of the evil effects from close interbreeding, we have seen that, on the one hand, it is a widely prevalent and ancient belief, that animals and plants profit from slight changes in their condition of life ; and it would appear that the germ, in a somewhat analogous manner, is more effectually stimulated by the male element, when taken from a distinct individual, and therefore slightly modified in nature, than when taken from a male having the same identical constitution. On the other hand, numerous facts have been given, showing that when animals are first subjected to captivity, even in their native land, and although allowed much liberty, their reproductive functions are often greatly impaired or quite annulled. Some groups of animals are more affected than others, but with apparently capricious exceptions in every group. Some animals never or rarely couple under confinement ; some couple freely, but never or rarely conceive. The secondary male characters, the maternal functions and instincts, are occasionally affected. With plants, when first subjected to cultivation, analogous facts Chap. XIX. FOUR LAST CHAPTERS. 161 have been observed. We probably owe our double flowers, rich seedless fruits, and in some cases greatly developed tubers, &c, to incipient sterility of the above nature combined with a copious supply of nutriment. Animals which have long been domesticated, and plants which have long been cultivated, can generally withstand, with unimpaired fertility, great changes in their conditions of life ; though both are sometimes slightly affected. With animals the somewhat rare capacity of breeding freely under confinement, together with their utility, mainly determine the kinds which have been domesticated. We can in no case precisely say what is the cause of the diminished fertility of an animal when first captured, or of a plant when first cultivated ; we can only infer that it is caused by a change of some kind in the natural conditions of life. The remarkable susceptibility of the reproductive system to such changes, — a susceptibility not common to any other organ, — apparently has an important bearing on Variability, as we shall see in a future chapter. It is impossible not to be struck with the double parallelism between the two classes of facts just alluded to. On the one hand, slight changes in the conditions of life, and crosses between slightly modified forms or varieties, are beneficial as far as prolificness and constitutional vigour are concerned. On the other hand, changes in the conditions greater in degree, or of a different nature, and crosses between forms which have been slowly and greatly modified by natural means, — in other words, between species, — are highly injurious, as far as the reproductive system is concerned, and in some few instances as far as constitutional vigour is concerned. Can this parallelism be accidental ? Does it not rather indicate some real bond of connection? As a fire goes out unless it be stirred up, so the vital forces are always tending, according to Mr. Herbert Spencer, to a state of equilibrium, unless disturbed and renovated through the action of other forces. In some few cases varieties tend to keep distinct, by breed- ing at different seasons, by great difference in size, or by sexual preference. But the crossing of varieties, far from 162 HYBRIDISM Chap. XIX. diminishing, generally adds to the fertility of the first union and of the mongrel offspring. Whether all the more widely distinct domestic varieties are invariably quite fertile when crossed, we do not positively know ; much time and trouble would be requisite for the necessary experiments, and many difficulties occur, such as the descent of the various races from aboriginally distinct species, and the doubts whether certain forms ought to be ranked as species or varieties. Nevertheless, the wide experience of practical breeders proves that the great majority of varieties, even if some should hereafter prove not to be indefinitely fertile inter se, are far more fertile when crossed, than the vast majority of closely allied natural species. A few remarkable cases have, however, been given on the authority of excellent observers, showing that with plants certain forms, which un- doubtedly must be ranked as varieties, yield fewer seeds when crossed than is natural to the parent-species. Other varieties have had their reproductive powers so far modified that they are either more or less fertile than their parents, when crossed with a distinct species. Nevertheless, the fact remains indisputable that domesti- cated varieties, of animals and of plants, which differ greatly from one another in structure, but which are certainly descended from the same aboriginal species, such as the races of the fowl, pigeon, many vegetables, and a host of other productions, are extremely fertile when crossed; and this seems to make a broad and impassable barrier between domestic varieties and natural species. But, as I will now attempt " to show, the distinction is not so great and over- whelmingly important as it at first appears. On the Difference in Fertility between Varieties and Species when crossed. This work is not the proper place for fully treating the subject of hybridism, and I have already given in my ' Origin of Species ' a moderately full abstract. I will here merely enumerate the general conclusions which may be relied on. and which bear on our present point. Firstly, the laws governing the production of hybrids are Chap. XIX. HYBRIDISM. 163 identical, or nearly identical, in the animal and vegetable kingdoms. Secondly, the sterility of distinct species when first united, and that of their hybrid offspring, graduate, by an almost infinite number of steps, from zero, when the ovule is never impregnated and a seed-capsule is never formed, up to com- plete fertilit}''. We can only escape the conclusion that some species are fully fertile when crossed, by determining to designate as varieties all the forms which are quite fertile. This high degree of fertility is, however, rare. Nevertheless, plants, which have been exposed to unnatural conditions, sometimes become modified in so peculiar a manner, that they are much more fertile when crossed with a distinct species than when fertilised by their own pollen. Success in effecting a first union between two species, and the fertility of their hybrids, depend in an eminent degree on the conditions of life being favourable. The innate sterility of hybrids of the same parentage and raised from the same seed-capsule often differs much in degree. Thirdly, the degree of sterility of a first cross between two species does not always run strictly parallel with that of their hybrid offspring. Many cases are known of species which can be crossed with ease, but yield hybrids excessively sterile ; and conversely some which can be crossed with great difficulty, but produce fairly fertile hybrids. This is an inexplicable fact, on the view that species have been specially endowed with mutual sterility in order to keep them distinct. Fourthly, the degree of sterility often differs greatly in two species when reciprocally crossed ; for the first will readily fertilise the second ; but the latter is incapable, after hundreds of trials, of fertilising the former. Hybrids produced from reciprocal crosses between the same two species likewise sometimes differ in their degree of sterility. These cases also are utterly inexplicable on the view of sterility being a special endowment. Fifthly, the degree of sterility of first crosses and of hybrids runs, to a certain extent, parallel with the general or system- atic affinity of the forms which are united. For species be- L64 HYBRIDISM. Chap. XIX. Longing to distinct genera can rarely, and those belonging to distinct families can never, be crossed. The parallelism, however, is far from complete ; for a multitude of closely allied species will not unite, or unite with extreme difficulty, whilst other species, widely different from one another, can be crossed with perfect facility. Nor does the difficulty depend on ordinary constitutional differences, for annual and perennial plants, deciduous and evergreen trees, plants flowering at different seasons, inhabiting different stations, and naturally living under the most opposite climates, can often be crossed with ease. The difficulty or facility ap- parently depends exclusively on the sexual constitution of the species which are crossed ; or on their sexual elective affinity, i.e. Wahlverivandtschaft of Gartner. As species rarely or never become modified in one character, without being at the same time modified in many characters, and as systematic affinity includes all visible similarities and dissimilarities, any difference in sexual constitution between two species would naturally stand in more or less close relation with their systematic position. Sixthly, the sterility of species when fiiot crossed, and that of hybrids, may possibly depend to a certain extent on distinct causes. With pure species the reproductive organs are in a perfect condition, whilst with hybrids they are often plainly deteriorated. A hybrid embryo which partakes of the con- stitution of its father and mother is exposed to unnatural conditions, as long as it is nourished within the womb, or egg, or seed of the mother-form ; and as we know that unnatural conditions often induce sterility, the reproductive organs of the hybrid might at this early age be permanently affected. But this cause has no bearing on the infertility of first unions. The diminished number of the offspring from first unions may often result, as is certainly sometimes the case, from the premature death of most of the hybrid emmyos. But we shall immediately see that a law of an unknown nature apparently exists, which leads to the offspring from unions, which are infertile, being themselves more or less infertile ; and this at present is all that can be said. Seventhly, hybrids and mongrels present, with the one great Chap. XIX. HYBRIDISM. 165 exception of fertility, the most striking accordance in all other respects ; namely, in the laws of their resemblance to their two parents, in their tendency to reversion, in their varia- bility, and in being absorbed through repeated crosses by either parent-form. After arriving at these conclusions, I was led to investigate a subject which throws considerable light on hybridism, namely, the fertility of heterostyled or dimorphic and trimorphic plants, when illegitimately united. I have had occasion several times to allude to these plants, and I may here give a brief abstract of my observations. Several plants belonging to distinct orders present two forms, which exist in about equal numbers, and which differ in no respect except in their reproductive organs; one form having a long pistil with short stamens, the other a short pistil with long stamens ; both with differently sized pollen-grains. With trimorphic plants there are three forms likewise differing in the lengths of their pistils and stamens, in the size and colour of the pollen-grains, and in some other respects ; and as in each of the three forms there are two sets of stamens, there are altogether six sets of stamens and three kinds of pistils. These organs are so proportioned in length to one another that, in any two of the forms, half the stamens in each stand on a level with the stigma of the third form. Now I have shown, and the result has been confirmed by other observers, that, in order to obtain full fertility with these plants, it is necessary that the stigma of the one form should be fertilised by pollen taken from the stamens of corresponding height in the other form. So that with dimorphic species two unions, which may be called legitimate, are fully fertile, and two, which may be called illegitimate, are more or less infertile. With trimorphic species six unions are legitimate, or fully fertile, and twelve are illegitimate, or more or less infertile.2 The infertility which may be observed in various dimorphic 2 My observations ' On the Cha- racter and hybrid-like nature of the offspring from the illegitimate union of Dimorphic and Trimorphic Plants ' were published in the ' Journal of the Linnean Soc.,' vol. x. p. 393. The abstract here given is nearly the same with that which appeared in the 6th edition of my 'Origin of Species.' 166 HYBRIDISM. Chap. XIX. and trimorphic plants, when illegitimately fertilised, that is, by pollen taken from stamens not corresponding in height with the pistil, differs much in degree, np to absolute and utter sterility ; just in the same manner as occurs in crossing distinct species. As the degree of sterility in the latter case depends in an eminent degree on the conditions of life being more or less favourable, so I have found it with illegitimate unions. It is well known that if pollen of a distinct species be placed on the stigma of a flower, and its own pollen be afterwards, even after a considerable interval of time, placed on the same stigma, its action is so strongly prepotent that it generally annihilates the effect of the foreign pollen ; so it is with the pollen of the several forms of the same species, for legitimate pollen is strongly prepotent over illegitimate pollen, when both are placed on the same stigma. I ascer- tained this by fertilising several flowers, first illegitimately, and twenty-four hours afterwards legitimately, with pollen taken from a peculiarly coloured variety, and all the seedlings were similarly coloured ; this shows that the legitimate pollen, though applied twenty-four hours subsequently, had wholly destroyed or prevented the action of the previously applied illegitimate pollen. Again, as, in making reciprocal crosses between the same two species, there is occasionally a great difference in the result, so the same thing occurs with trimorphic plants; for instance, the mid-styled form of Lythrum salicaria could be illegitimately fertilised with the greatest ease by pollen from the longer stamens of the short- styled form, and yielded many seeds ; but the short-styled form did not yield a single seed when fertilised by the longer stamens of the mid-st}Tled form. In all these respects the forms of the same undoubted species, when illegitimately united, behave in exactly the same manner as do two distinct species when crossed. This led me carefully to observe during four years many seedlings, raised from several illegitimate unions. The chief result is that these illegitimate plants, as they may be called, are not fully fertile. It is possible to raise from dimorphic species, both long-styled and short-styled illegitimate plants, and from trimorphic plants all three illegitimate forms. These Chaf. XIX. HYBRIDISM. 167 can then be properly united in a legitimate manner. When this is done, there is no apparent reason why they should not yield as many seeds as did their parents when legiti- mately fertilised. But such is not the case ; they are all infertile, but in various degrees ; some being so utterly and incurably sterile that they did not yield during four seasons a single seed or even seed-capsule. These illegitimate plants, which are so sterile, although united with each other in a legitimate manner, may be strictly compared with hybrids when crossed inter se, and it is well known how sterile these latter generally are. When, on the other hand, a hybrid is crossed with either pure parent-species, the sterility is usually much lessened : and so it is when an illegitimate plant is fertilised by a legitimate plant. In the same manner as the sterility of hybrids does not always run parallel with the difficulty of making the first cross between the two parent- species, so the sterility of certain illegitimate plants was unusually great, whilst the sterility of the union from which they were derived was by no means great. With hybrids raised from the same seed-capsule the degree of sterility is innately variable, so it is in a marked manner with illegiti- mate plants. Lastly, many hybrids are profuse and persistent flowerers, whilst other and more sterile hybrids produce few flowers, and are weak, miserable dwarfs; exactly similar cases occur with the illegitimate offspring of various dimorphic and trimorphic plants. Although there is the closest identity in character and behaviour between illegitimate plants and hybrids, it is hardly an exaggeration to maintain that the former are hybrids, but produced within the limits of the same species by the improper union of certain forms, whilst ordinary hybrids are produced from an improper union between so- called distinct species. We have already seen that there is the closest similarity in all respects between first illegitimate unions, and first crosses between distinct species. This will perhaps be made more fully apparent by an illustration : we may suppose that a botanist found two well-marked varieties (and such occur) of the long-styled form of the trimorphic Ly thrum salicaria, and that he determined to try by crossing 168 HYBRIDISM. Chap. XIX. whether they were specifically distinct. He would find that they yielded only about one-fifth of the proper number of seed, and that they behaved in all the other above- specified respects as if they had been two distinct species. But to make the case sure, he would raise plants from his supposed hybridised seed, and he would find that the seedlings were miserably dwarfed and utterly sterile, and that they behaved in all other respects like ordinary hybrids. He might then maintain that he had actually proved, in accordance with the common view, that his two varieties were as good and as distinct species as any in the world ; but he would be com- pletely mistaken. The facts now given on dimorphic and trimorphie plants are important, because they show us, first, that the physio- logical test of lessened fertility, both in first crosses and in hybrids, is no criterion of specific distinction ; secondly, because we may conclude that there is some unknown bond which connects the infertility of illegitimate unions with that of their illegitimate offsjDring, and we are led to extend the same view to first crosses and hybrids ; thirdly, because we find, and this seems to me of especial importance, that two or three forms of the same species may exist and may differ in no respect whatever, either in structure or in constitution, relatively to external conditions, and yet be sterile when united in certain ways. For we must remember that it is the union of the sexual elements of individuals of the same form, for instance, of two long-st}Tled forms, which results in sterility ; whilst it is the union of the sexual element proper to two distinct forms which is fertile. Hence the case appears at first sight exactly the reverse of what occurs in the ordinary unions of the individuals of the same species, and with crosses between distinct species. It is, however, doubt- ful whether this is really so ; but I will not enlarge on this obscure subject. We may, however, infer as probable from the consideration of dimorphic and trimorphie plants, that the sterility of dis- tinct species when crossed, and of their hybrid progeny, depends exclusively on the nature of their sexual elements, and not on any difference in their structure or general con- Chap. XIX. HYBKIDISM. 169 stitution. We are also led to this same conclusion by con- sidering reciprocal crosses, in which the male of one species cannot be united, or only with great difficulty, with the female of a second species, whilst the converse cross can be effected with perfect facility. That excellent observer, Gartner, likewise concluded that species when crossed are sterile owing to differences confined to their reproductive systems. On the principle which makes it necessary for man, whilst he is selecting and improving his domestic varieties, to keep them separate, it would clearly be advantageous to varieties in a state of nature, that is to incipient species, if they could be kept from blending, either through sexual aversion, or by becoming mutually sterile. Hence it at one time appeared to me probable, as it has to others, that this sterility might have been acquired through natural selection. On this view we must suppose that a shade of lessened fertility first spon- taneously appeared, like any other modification, in certain individuals of a species when crossed with other individuals of the same species ; and that successive slight degrees of infertility, from being advantageous, were slowly accumulated. This appears all the more probable, if we admit that the structural differences between the forms of dimorphic and trimorphic plants, as the length and curvature of the pistil, &c, have been co-adapted through natural selection ; for if this be admitted, we can hardly avoid extending the same conclusion to their mutual infertility. Sterility, moreover, has been acquired through natural selection for other and widely different purposes, as with neuter insects in reference to their social economy. In the case of plants, the flowers on the circumference of the truss in the guelder-rose (Viburnum opulus) and those on the summit of the spike in the feather- hyacinth (Muscari comosum) have been rendered conspicuous, and apparently in consequence sterile, in order that insects might easily discover and visit the perfect flowers. But when we endeavour to apply the principle of natural selection to the acquirement by distinct species of mutual sterility, we meet with great difficulties. In the first place, it may be remarked that separate regions are often inhabited by groups 170 HYBRIDISM. Chap. XIX. of species or by single species, which when brought together and crossed are found to be more or less sterile ; now it could clearly have been no advantage to such separated species to have been rendered mutually sterile, and consequently this could not have been effected through natural selection ; but it may perhaps be argued, that, if a species were rendered sterile with some one compatriot, sterility with other species would follow as a necessary consequence. In the second place, it is as much opposed to the theory of natural selection, as to the theory of special creation, that in reciprocal crosses the male element of one form should have been rendered utterly impotent on a second form, whilst at the same time the male element of this second form is enabled freely to fertilise the first form ; for this peculiar state of the repro- ductive .system could not possibly have been advantageous to either species. In considering the probability of natural selection having come into action in rendering species mutually sterile, one of the greatest difficulties will be found to lie in the existence of many graduated steps from slightly lessened fertility to absolute sterility. It may be admitted, on the principle above explained, that it would profit an incipient species if it were rendered in some slight degree sterile when crossed with its parent-form or with some other variety ; for thus fewer bastardised and deteriorated offspring would be produced to commingle their blood with the new species in process of formation. But he who will take the trouble to reflect on the steps by which this first degree of sterility could be increased through natural selection to that higher degree which is common to so many species, and which is universal with species which have been differentiated to a generic or family rank, will find the subject extraordinarily complex. After mature reflection it seems to me that this could not have been effected through natural selection. Take the case of any two species which, when crossed, produce few and sterile offspring ; now, what is there which could favour the survival of those individuals which happened to be endowed in a slightly higher degree with mutual infertility, and which thus approached by one small step towards absolute sterility Q Chat. XIX. HYBRIDISM. 171 Yet an advance of this kind, if the theory of natural selection be brought to bear, must have incessantly occurred with many species, for a multitude are mutually quite barren. With sterile neuter insects we have reason to believe that modifications in their structure and fertility have been slowly accumulated by natural selection, from an advantage having been thus indirectly given to the community to which they belonged over other communities of the same species ; but an individual animal not belonging to a social community, if rendered slightly sterile when crossed with some other variety, would not thus itself gain any advantage or indirectly give any advantage to the other individuals of the same variety, thus leading to their preservation. But it would be superfluous to discuss this question in detail ; for with plants we have conclusive evidence that the sterility of crossed species must be due to some principle, quite independent of natural selection. Both Gartner and Kblreuter have proved that in general including numerous species, a series can be formed from species which when crossed yield fewer and fewer seeds, to species which never produce a single seed, but yet are affected by the pollen of certain other species, for the germen swells. It is here manifestly im- possible to select the more sterile individuals, which have already ceased to yield seeds ; so that this acme of sterility, when the germen alone is affected, cannot have been gained through selection ; and from the laws governing the various grades of sterility being so uniform throughout the animal and vegetable kingdoms, we may infer that the cause, what- ever it may be, is the same or nearly the same in all cases. As species have not been rendered mutually infertile through the accumulative action of natural selection, and as we may safely conclude, from the previous as well as from other and more general considerations, that they have not been endowed through an act of creation with this quality, we must infer that it has arisen incidentally during their slow formation in connection with other and unknown changes in their organisation. By a quality arising incidentally, I refer to such cases as different species of animals and plants being differently affected by poisons to which they are not naturally 172 HIBRIDISM. Chap. XIX. exposed ; and this difference in susceptibility is clearly in- cidental on other and unknown differences in their organisa- tion. So again the capacity in different kinds of trees to be grafted on each other, or on a third species, differs much, and is of no advantage to these trees, but is incidental on struc- tural or functional differences in their woody tissues. We need not feel surprise at sterility incidentally resulting from crosses between distinct species, — the modified descendants of a common progenitor, — when we bear in mind how easily the reproductive system is affected by various causes — often by extremely slight changes in the conditions of life, by too close interbreeding, and by other agencies. It is well to bear in mind such cages as that of the Passiflora alata, which re- covered its self-fertility from being grafted on a distinct species — the cases of plants which normally or abnormally are self-impotent, but can readily be fertilised by the pollen of a distinct species — and lastly the cases of individual domesticated animals which evince towards each other sexual incompatibility. We now at last come to the immediate point under dis- cussion : how is it that, with some few exceptions in the case of plants, domesticated varieties, such as those of the dog, fowl, pigeon, several fruit-trees, and culinary vegetables, which differ from each other in external characters more than many species, are perfectly fertile when crossed, or even fertile in excess, whilst closely allied species are almost invariably in some degree sterile ? We can, to a certain extent, give a satisfac- tory answer to this question. Passing over the fact that the amount of external difference between two species is no sure guide to their degree of mutual sterility, so that similar differ- ences in the case of varieties would be no sure guide, we know that with species the cause lies exclusively in differences in their sexual constitution. Kow the conditions to which domesticated animals and cultivated plants have been sub- jected have had so little tendency towards modifying the reproductive system in a manner leading to mutual sterility, that we have very good grounds for admitting the directly opposite doctrine of Pallas, namely, that such conditions Chap. XIX. HYBEIDISM. 173 generally eliminate this tendency ; so that the domesticated descendants of species, which in their natural state would have been in some degree sterile when crossed, become perfectly fertile together. With plants, so far is cultivation from giving a tendency towards mutual sterility, that in several well - authenticated cases, already often alluded to, certain species have been affected in a very different manner, for they have become self-impotent, whilst still retaining the capacity of fertilising, and being fertilised by, distinct species. If the Pallasian doctrine of the elimination of sterility through long-continued domestication be admitted, and it can hardly be rejected, it becomes in the highest degree improbable that similar circumstances should commonly both induce and eliminate the same tendency ; though in certain cases, with species having a peculiar constitution, sterility might occa- sionally be thus induced. Thus, as I believe, we can under- stand why with domesticated animals varieties have not been produced which are mutually sterile ; and why with plants only a few such cases have been observed, namely, by Gartner, with certain varieties of maize and verbascuni, by other ex- perimentalists with varieties of the gourd and melon, and by Kolreuter with one kind of tobacco. With respect to varieties which have originated in a htate of nature, it is almost hopeless to expect to prove by direct evidence that they have been rendered mutually sterile : for if even a trace of sterility could be detected, such varieties would at once be raised by almost every naturalist to the rank of distinct species. If, for instance, Gartner's statement were fully confirmed, that the blue and red flowered forms of the pimpernel (Anagallis arvensis) are sterile when crossed, I pre- sume that all the botanists who now maintain on various grounds that these two forms are merely fleeting varieties, would at once admit that they were specifically distinct. The real difficulty in our present subject is not, as it appears to me, why domestic varieties have not become mutually in- fertile when crossed, but why this has so generally occurred with natural varieties as soon as they have been modified in a sufficient and permanent degree to take rank as species. We are far from precisely knowing the cause ; but we can see 174 HYBRIDISM. Chap. XIX. that the species, owing to their struggle for existence with numerous competitors, must have been exposed to more uni- form conditions of life during long periods of time than domestic varieties have been, and this may well make a wide difference in the result. For we know how commonly wild animals and plants, when taken from their natural conditions and subjected to captivity, are rendered sterile ; and the reproductive functions of organic beings which have always lived and been slowly modified under natural con- ditions would probably in like manner be eminently sensitive to the influence of an unnatural cross. Domesticated pro- ductions, on the other hand, which, as shown by the mere fact of their domestication, were not originally highly sensitive to changes in their conditions of life, and which can now generally resist with undiminished fertility repeated changes of conditions, might be expected to produce varieties, which would be little liable to have their reproductive powers inju- riously affected by the act of crossing with other varieties which had originated in a like manner. Certain naturalists have recently laid too great stress, as it appears to me, on the difference in fertility between varieties and species when crossed. Some allied species of trees cannot be grafted on one another, whilst all varieties can be so grafted. Some allied animals are affected in a very different manner by the same poison, but with varieties no such case until recently was known ; whilst now it has been proved that immunity from certain poisons sometimes stands in correla- tion with the colour of the individuals of the same species. The period of gestation generally differs much in distinct species, but with varieties until lately no such difference had been observed. Here we have various physiological differences, and no doubt others could be added, between one species and another of the same genus, which do not occur, or occur with extreme rarity, in the case of varieties ; and these differences are apparently wholly or in chief part incidental on other constitutional differences, just in the same manner as the sterility of crossed species is incidental on differences confined to the sexual system. AVhy, then, should these latter differ- ences, however serviceable they may indirectly be in keeping Chap. XIX. HYBRIDISM. 175 the inhabitants of the same country distinct, be thought of such paramount importance, in comparison with other inci- dental and functional differences ? No sufficient answer to this question can be given. Hence the fact that widely distinct domestic varieties are, with rare exceptions, perfectly fertile when crossed, and produce fertile offspring, whilst closely allied species are, with rare exceptions, more or less sterile, is not nearly so formidable an objection as it appears at first to the theory of the common descent of allied species. 176 SELECTION. Chap. XX CHAPTER XX. SELECTION" BY MAX. SELECTION A DIFFICULT ART — METHODICAL, UNCONSCIOUS, AND NATURAL SELECTION — RESULTS OF METHODICAL SELECTION CARE TAKEN IN SE- LECTION— SELECTION "WITH PLANTS — SELECTION CARRIED ON BY THE ANCIENTS AND BY SEMI-CIVILISED PEOPLE — UNIMPORTANT CHARACTERS OFTEN ATTENDED TO — UNCONSCIOUS SELECTION AS CIRCUMSTANCES SLOWLY CHANGE, SO HATE OUR DOMESTICATED ANIMALS CHANGED THROUGH THE ACTION OF UNCONSCIOUS SELECTION — INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT BREEDERS ON THE SAME SUB- VARIETY — PLANTS AS AFFECTED BY UNCONSCIOUS SELECTION — EFFECTS OF SELECTION AS SHOWN BY THE GREAT AMOUNT OF DIFFERENCE IN THE PARTS MOST VALUED BY MAN. The power of Selection, whether exercised by man, or brought into play under nature through the struggle for existence and the consequent survival of the fittest, absolutely depends on the variability of organic beings. Without variability nothing can be effected; slight individual differences, how- ever, suffice for the work, and are probably the chief or sole means in the production of new species. Hence our dis- cussion on the causes and laws of variability ought in strict order to have preceded the present subject, as well as inheri- tance, crossing, &c. ; but practically the present arrange- ment has been found the most convenient. Man does not attempt to cause variability ; though he unintentionally effects this by exposing organisms to new conditions of life, and by crossing breeds already formed. But variability being granted, he works wonders. Unless some degree of selection be exer- cised, the free commingling of the individuals of the same variety soon obliterates, as we have previously seen, the slight differences which arise, and gives uniformity of cha- racter to the whole body of individuals. In separated districts, long-continued exposure to different conditions of life may produce new races without the aid of selection ; but to this subject of the direct action of the conditions of life I shall recur in a future chapter. UHAP. 1A. SELECTION. 177 When animals or plants are bom with some conspicuous and firmly inherited new character, selection is reduced to the preservation of such individuals, and to the subsequent pre- vention of crosses ; so that nothing more need be said on the subject. But in the great majority of cases a new character, or some superiority in an old character, is at first faintly pronounced, and is not strongly inherited ; and then the full difficulty of selection is experienced. Indomitable patience, the finest powers of discrimination, and sound judgment must be exercised during many years. A clearly predetermined object must be kept steadily in view. Few men are endowed with all these qualities, especially with that of discriminating very slight differences ; judgment can be acquired only by long experience ; but if any of these qualities be wanting, the labour of a life may be thrown away. I have been astonished when celebrated breeders, whose skill and judg- ment have been proved by their success at exhibitions, have shown me their animals, which appeared all alike, and have assigned their reasons for matching this and that individual. The importance of the great principle of Selection mainly lies in this power of selecting scarcely appreciable differences, which nevertheless are found to be transmissible, and which can be accumulated until the result is made manifest to the eyes of every beholder. The principle of selection may be conveniently divided into three kinds. Methodical selection is that which guides a man who systematically endeavours to modify a breed according to some predetermined standard. Unconscious selection is that which follows from men naturally preserving the most valued and destroying the less valued individuals, without any thought of altering the breed ; and undoubtedly this process slowly works great changes. Unconscious selection graduates into methodical, and only extreme cases can be distinctly separated ; for he who preserves a useful or perfect animal will generally breed from it with the hope of getting offspring of the same character ; but as long as he has not a prede- termined purpose to improve the breed, he may be said to be selecting unconsciously.1 Lastly, we have Natural selection, 1 The term unconscious selection has been objected to as a contradiction; 178 SELECTION. Chap. XX. which implies that the individuals which are best fitted for the complex, and in the course of ages changing conditions to which they are exposed, generally survive and procreate their kind. With domestic productions, natural selection comes to a certain extent into action, independently of, and even in opposition to, the will of man. Methodical Selection. — What man has effected within recent times in England by methodical selection is clearly shown by our exhibitions of improved quadrupeds and fancy birds. With respect to cattle, sheep, and pigs, we owe their great improvement to a long series of well-known names — Bake- well, Colling, Ellman, Bates, Jonas Webb, Lords Leicester and Western, Fisher Hobbs, and others. Agricultural writers are unanimous on the power of selection ; any number of statements to this effect could be quoted ; a few will suffice. Youatt, a sagacious and experienced observer, writes,2 the principle of selection is " that which enables the agricul- turist, not only to modify the character of his flock, but to change it altogether." A great breeder of Shorthorns 3 says, " In the anatomy of the shoulder modern breeders have made " great improvement on the Ketton shorthorns by correcting " the defect in the knuckle or shoulder-joint, and by laying " the top of the shoulder more snugly in the crop, and thereby " filling up the hollow behind it The eye has its " fashion at different periods : at one time the eye high and " outstanding from the head, and at another time the sleepy • 1 eye sunk into the head ; but these extremes have merged ' into the medium of a full, clear and prominent eye with a placid look." Again, hear what an excellent judge of pigs 4 says : " The ' legs should be no longer than just to prevent the animal's " belly from trailing on the ground. The leg is the least but see some excellent observations on this head bv Prof. Huxley ('Nat. Hist. Review,' Oct. 1864, p. 578), who remarks that when the wind heaps up sand-dune3 it sifts and uncon- sciously selects from the gravel on the beach grains of sand of equal size. 2 'On Sheep,' 1838, p. 60. 3 Mr. J. Wright on Shorthorn Cattle, in ' Journal of Royal Agricult Soc.,' vol. vii. pp. 208, 209. * H. D. Richardson ' On Pigs,' 1847, p. 44. Chap. XX. METHODICAL SELECTION. 179 " profitable portion of the hog, and we therefore require no " more of it .than is absolutely necessary for the support of " the rest." Let any one compare the wild-boar with any improved breed, and he will see how effectually the legs have been shortened. Few persons, except breeders, are aware of the systematic care taken in selecting animals, and of the necessity of having a clear and almost prophetic vision into futurity. Lord Spencer's skill and judgment were well known; and he writes,5 " It is therefore very desirable, before any man com- " mences to breed either cattle or sheep, that he should make " up his mind to the shape and qualities he wishes to obtain, "and steadily pursue this object." Lord Somerville, in speaking of the marvellous improvement of the New Leicester sheep, effected by Bakewell and his successors, says, " It would seem as if they had first drawn a perfect form, and then given it life." Youatt 6 urges the necessity of annually drafting each flock, as niany animals will certainly degenerate " from the standard of excellence which the breeder has established in his own mind." Even with a bird of such little importance as the canary, long ago (1780-1790) rules were established, and a standard of perfection was fixed ac- cording to which the London fanciers tried to breed the several sub- varieties. 7 A great winner of prizes at the Pigeon - shows,8 in describing the short-faced Almond Tumbler, says, "There are many first-rate fanciers who are particularly " partial to what is called the goldfinch-beak, which is very " beautiful ; others say, take a full-size round cherry then " take a barleycorn, and judiciously placing and thrusting it " into the cherry, form as it were your beak ; and that is not " all, for it will form a good head and beak, provided, as I "said before, it is judiciously done; others take an oat; but " as I think the goldfinch-beak the handsomest, I would advi-e " the inexperienced fancier to get the head of a goldfinch, and " keep it by him for his observation." Wonderfully different 5 ' Journal of Royal Agricult. Soc.,' rol. i. p. 24. 6 ' On Sheep,' pp. 520, 319. 7 Loudon's ; Mag. of Nat. Hist.,' vol. viii., 1835, p. 618. 8 ' A treatise on the Art of Breed- ing the Almond Tumbler,' 1851, p. 9. 180 SELECTION. Chap. XX. as are the Leaks of the rock pigeon and goldfinch, the end has undoubtedly been nearly gained, as far as external shape and proportions are concerned. Not only should our animals be examined with the greatest care whilst alive, but, as Anderson remarks,9 their carcases should be scrutinised, " so as to breed from the descendants of such only as, in the language of the butcher, cut up well." The 44 grain of the meat " in cattle, and its being well marbled with fat,10 and the greater or less accumulation of fat in the abdomen of our sheep, have been attended to with success. So with poultry, a writer,11 speaking of Cochin-China fowls, which are said to differ much in the quality of their flesh, says, " the best mode is to purchase two young brother-cocks, " kill, dress, and serve up one ; if he be indifferent, similarly " dispose of the other, and try again ; if, however, he be fine " and well-flavoured, his brother will not be amiss for breeding 44 purposes for the table." The great principle of the division of labour has been brought to bear on selection. In certain districts 12 " the rt breeding of bulls is confined to a very limited number of " persons, who by devoting their whole attention to this '• department, are able from year to year to furnish a class of '• bulls which are steadily improving the general breed of the " district." The rearing and letting of choice rams bas long been, as is well known, a chief source of profit to several eminent breeders. In parts of Germany this principle is carried with merino sheep to an extreme point.13 So impor- tant is the proper selection of breeding animals considered, " that the best flock-masters do not trust to their own judg- " ment or to that of their shepherds, but employ persons called " 4 sheep-classifiers,' who make it their special business to 44 attend to this part of the management of several flocks, 44 and thus to preserve, or if possible to improve, the best 44 qualities of both parents in the lambs." In Saxony, 44 when 9 1 Recreations in Agriculture,' vol. ii. p. 409. 19 Youatt on Cattle, pp. 191. 227. 11 Ferguson, 4 Prize Poultry,' 1854, p. 208. 12 Wilson, in ' Transact. Highland Aericult. Soc.,' quoted in 4 Gard. Chronicle,' 1844, p. 29. 13 Simmonds, quoted in 1 Gard. Chronicle,' 1855, p. 637. And for the second quotation, see Youatt on Sheep, p. 171. Chap. XX. METHODICAL SELECTION. 181 " the lambs are weaned, each in his turn is placed upon a "table that his wool and form may be minutely observed. " The finest are selected for breeding and receive a first " mark. When they are one year old, and prior to shearing " them, another close examination of those previously marked " takes place : those in which no defect can be found receive " a second mark, and the rest are condemned. A few months " afterwards a third and last scrutiny is made ; the prime " rams and ewes receive a third and final mark, but the " slightest blemish is sufficient to cause the rejection of the " animal." These sheep are bred and valued almost ex- clusively for the fineness of their wool ; and the result corresponds with the labour bestowed on their selection. Instruments have been invented to measure accurately the thickness of the fibres ; and " an Austrian fleece has been produced of which twelve hairs equalled in thickness one from a Leicester sheep." Throughout the world, wherever silk is produced, the greatest care is bestowed on selecting the cocoons from which the moths for breeding are to be reared. A careful cultivator14 likewise examines the moths themselves, and destroys those that are not perfect. But what more immediately concerns us is that certain families in France devote themselves to raising eggs for sale.15 In China, near Shanghai, the in- habitants of two small districts have the privilege of raising eggs for the whole surrounding country, and that they may give up their whole time to this business, they are interdicted by law from producing silk.16 The care which successful breeders take in matching their birds is surprising. Sir John Sebright, whose fame is per- petuated by the " Sebright Bantam," used to spend " two and three days in examining, consulting, and disputing with a friend which were the best of five or six birds." 17 Mr. Bult, whose pouter-pigeons won so many prizes, and were exported to North America under the charge of a man sent on purpose, 14 Robinet, ' Vers a Soie,' 1848, p. 16 M. Simon, in 'Bull.de la Soc. 271. d'Acclimat.,' torn, ix., 1862, p. 221. 15 Quatrefages, 1 Les Maladies du 17 ' The Poultry Chronicle/ vol. i., V«r a Soie,' 1859, p. 101. 1854, p. 607. 30 182 SELECTION. Chap. XX. told ine that lie always deliberated for several days before he matched each pair. Hence we can understand the advice of an eminent fancier, who writes,18 " I would here particularly " guard you against having too great a variety of pigeons, " otherwise you will know a little of all, but nothing about " one as it ought to be known." Apparently it transcends the power of the human intellect to breed all kinds : " it •• is possible that there may be a few fanciers that have a "v good general knowledge of fancy pigeons ; but there are kk many more who labour under the delusion of supposing " they know what they do not." The excellence of one sub- variety, the Almond Tumbler, lies in the plumage, carriage, head, beak, and eye ; but it is too presumptuous in the beginner to try for all these points. The great judge above quoted says, " There are some young fanciers who are over- " covetous, who go for all the above five properties at once ; they have their reward by getting nothing." We thus see that breeding even fancy pigeons is no simple art : we may smile at the solemnity of these precepts, but he who laughs will win no prizes. What methodical selection has effected for our animals is sufficiently proved, as already remarked, by our Exhibitions. So greatly were the sheep belonging to some of the earlier breeders, such as Bakewell and Lord Western, changed, that many persons could not be persuaded that they had not been crossed. Our pigs, as Mr. Corringham remarks,19 during the last twenty years have undergone, through rigorous selection together with crossing, a complete metamorphosis. The first exhibition for poultry was held in the Zoological Gardens in 1845 ; and the improvement effected since that time has been great. As Mr. Bailey, the great judge, remarked to me, it was formerly ordered that the comb of the Spanish cock should be upright, and in four or five years all good birds had upright combs ; it was ordered that the Polish cock should have no comb or wattles, and now a bird thus fur- nished would be at once disqualified ; beards were ordered, 18 J. M. Eaton, 'A Treatise on 1851, p. 11. Fancy Pigeons,' 1852, p. xiv., and 19 'Journal Royal Agricultural *A Treatise on the Almond Tumbler,' Soc.,' vol. vi. p. 22. Chap. XX. METHODICAL SELECTION. 183 and out of fifty-seven pens lately (1860) exhibited at the Crystal Palace, all had beards. So it has been in many other cases. But in all cases the judges order only what is occa- sionally produced and what can be improved and rendered constant by selection. The steady increase in weight during the last few years in our fowls, turkeys, ducks, and geese is notorious ; " six-pound ducks are now common, whereas four pounds was formerly the average." As the time required to make a change has not often been recorded, it may be worth mentioning that it took Mr. Wieking thirteen years to put a clean white head on an almond tumbler's body, " a triumph," says another fancier, " of which he may be justly proud." 20 Mr. Toilet, of Betley Hall, selected cows, and especially bulls, descended from good milkers, for the sole purpose of improving his cattle for the production of cheese ; he steadily tested the milk with the lactometer, and in eight years he increased, as I was informed by him, the product in propor- tion of four to three. Here is a curious case 21 of steady but slow progress, with the end not as yet fully attained: in 1784 a race of silkworms was introduced into France, in which one hundred in the thousand failed to produce white cocoons; but now after careful selection during sixty-five generations, the proportion of yellow cocoons has been reduced to thirty -five in the thousand. With plants selection has been followed with the same good result as with animals. But the process is simpler, for plants in the great majority of cases bear both sexes. Nevertheless, with most kinds it is necessary to take as much care to prevent crosses as with animals or unisexual plants ; but with some plants, such as peas, this care is not necessary. With all improved plants, excepting of course those which are propagated by buds, cuttings, &c, it is almost indispen- sable to examine the seedlings and destroy those which depart from the proper type. This is called " roguing," and is, in fact, a form of selection, like the rejection of inferior animals. Experienced horticulturists and agriculturists 20 'Poultry Chronicle,' vol. ii., 21 Isid. Geoffroy St.-Hilaire, 'Hist 1855, p. 596. Nat. Gen.,' torn. iii. p. 254. 184 SELECTION. Chap. XX. incessantly urge every one to preserve the finest plants for the production of seed. Although plants often present much more conspicuous variations than animals, yet the closest attention is generally requisite to detect each slight and favourable change. Mr. Masters relates 22 how " many a patient hour was devoted," whilst he was young, to the detection of differences in peas intended for seed. Mr. Barnet 23 remarks that the old scarlet American strawberry was cultivated for more than a century without producing a single variety ; and another writer ob- serves how singular it was that when gardeners first began to attend to this fruit it began to vary ; the truth no doubt being that it had always varied, but that, until slight vari- ations were selected and propagated by seed, no conspicuous result was obtained. The finest shades of difference in wheat have been discriminated and selected with almost as much care as, in the case of the higher animals, for instance by Col. Le Couteur and more especially by Major Hallett. It may be worth while to give a few examples of method- ical selection with plants ; but in fact the great improvement of all our anciently cultivated plants may be attributed to selection long carried on, in part methodically, and in part unconsciously. I have shown in a former chapter how the weight of the gooseberry has been increased by systematic selection and culture. The flowers of the Heartsease have been similarly increased in size and regularity of outline. With the Cineraria, Mr. Glenny 24 " was bold enough when " the flowers were ragged and starry and ill defined in colour, "to fix a standard which was then considered outrageously " high and impossible, and which, even if reached, it was " said, we should be no gainers by, as it would spoil the " beauty of the flowers. He maintained that he was right ; " and the event has proved it to be so." The doubling of flowers has several times been effected by careful selection : the Rev. W. Williamson,25 after sowing during several years 22 'Gardener's Chron.,' 1850, p. 24 ' Journal of Horticulture,' 18G2, 198. p. 369. 23 1 Transact. Hort. Soc.,' vol. vi. p. 25 ' Transact. Hort. Soc.,' vol. iv. 152, p. 381. Chap. XX. BY THE ANCIENTS. 185 seed of Anemone coronaria, found a plant with one additional petal ; he sowed the seed of this, and by perseverance in the same course obtained several varieties with six or seven rows of petals. The single Scotch rose was doubled, and yielded eight good varieties in nine or ten years.26 The Canterbury bell (Campanula medium) was doubled by careful selection in four generations.27 In four years Mr. Buckman,28 by culture and careful selection, converted parsnips, raised from wild seed, into a new and good variety. By selection during a long course of years, the early maturity of peas has been hastened by between ten and twenty-one days.29 A more curious case is offered by the beet plant, which since its culti- vation in France, has almost exactly doubled its yield of sugar. This has been effected by the most careful selection ; the specific gravity of the roots being regularly tested, and the best roots saved for the production of seed.30 Selection by Ancient and Semi-civilised People. In attributing so much importance to the selection of animals and plants, it may be objected, that methodical selec- tion would not have been carried on during ancient times. A distinguished naturalist considers it as absurd to suppose that semi-civilised people should have practised selection of any kind. Undoubtedly the principle has been systematically acknowledged and followed to a far greater extent within the last hundred years than at any former period, and a corre- sponding result has been gained ; but it would be a greater error to suppose, as we shall immediately see, that its impor- tance was not recognised and acted on during the most ancient times, and by semi- civilised people. I should premise that many facts now to be given only show that care was taken in breeding ; but when this is the case, selection is almost sure to be practised to a certain extent. We shall hereafter be enabled better to judge how far selection, when only occa- cs 'Transact. Hort. Soc.,' vol. iv. p. vi. p. 96; Mr. Earnes, in 'Gard. 285. Chronicle,' 1844, p. 476. 27 Rev. W. Bromehead, in 'Gard. 30 Godron, 'De l'Espece,' 1859, Chronicle/ 1857, p. 550. torn. ii. p. 69; 'Gard. Chronicle,' 28 'Gard. Chronicle,' 1862, p. 721. 1854, p. 258. 29 Dr. Anderson, in ' The Bee,' vol. 186 SELECTION". Chap. XX. sionally carried on, by a few of the inhabitants of a country, will slowly produce a great effect. In a well-known passage in the thirtieth chapter of Genesis, rules are given for influencing, as was then thought possible, the colour of sheep ; and speckled and dark breeds are spoken of as being kept separate. By the time of David the fleece was likened to snow. Youatt,31 who has discussed all the passages in relation to breeding in the Old Testament, con- cludes that at this early period " some of the best principles of breeding must have been steadily and long pursued." It was ordered, according to Moses, that " Thou shalt not let thy cattle gender with a diverse kind ; " but mules were pur- chased,32 so that at this early period other nations must have crossed the horse and ass. It is said33 that Erichthonius, some generations before the Trojan war, had many brood- mares, " which by his care and judgment in the choice of stallions produced a breed of horses superior to any in the surrounding countries." Homer (Book v.) speaks of ^Eneas' horses as bred from mares which were put to the steeds of Laomedon. Plato, in his ' Bepublic,' says to Glaucus, " I see that you raise at your house a great many dogs for the chase. Do you take care about breeding and pairing them ? Among animals of good blood, are there not always some which are superior to the rest ? " To which Glaucus answers in the affirmative.34 Alexander the Great selected the finest Indian cattle to send to Macedonia to improve the breed.35 Acccord- ing to Pliny,36 King Pyrrhus had an especially valuable breed of oxen : and he did not suffer the bulls and cows to come together till four years old, that the breed might not degenerate. Yirgil, in his Georgics (lib. iii.), gives as strong advice as any modern agriculturist could do, carefully to select the breeding stock ; " to note the tribe, the lineage, and the sire ; whom to reserve for husband of the herd ; " — to brand the progeny ; — to select sheep of the purest white, and t > examine if their tongues are swarthy. We have seen that the 31 On Sheep, p. 18. 34 Dr. Dally, translate! in ' Anthro- 32 Volz, 1 Beitrage zur Kulturge- pological Review,' May 1864, p. 101. schichte.' 1852, s. 47. ^"Volz, 'Beitrage,' &c, 1852, s. 33 Mitford's 'History of Greece." 80. vol. i. p. 73. 35 1 History of the World,' ch. 45. Chap. XX. BY THE ANCIENTS. 187 Romans kept pedigrees of their pigeons, and this would have been a senseless proceeding had not great care been taken in breeding them. Columella gives detailed instructions about breeding fowls : " Let the breeding hens therefore be of a choice colour, "a robust body, square-built, full- breasted, with " large heads, with upright and bright-red combs. Those " are believed to be the best bred which have five toes." 37 According to Tacitus, the Celts attended to the races of their domestic animals; and Caesar states that they paid high prices to merchants for fine imported horses.33 In regard to plants, Virgil speaks of yearly culling the largest seeds ; and Celsus says, " where the corn and crop is but small, we must pick out the best ears of corn, and of them lay up our seed separately by itself." 39 Coming down the stream of time, we may be brief. At about the beginning of the ninth century Charlemagne expressly ordered his officers to take great care of his stallions ; and if any proved bad or old, to forewarn him in good time before they were put to the mares.40 Even in a country so little civilised as Ireland during the ninth century, it would appear from some ancient verses,41 describing a ransom demanded by Cormac, that animals from particular places, or having a particular character, were valued. Thus it is said, — Two pigs of the pigs of Mac Lir, A ram and ewe both round and red, I brought with me from Aengus. 1 brought. with me a stallion and a mare From the beautiful stud of Manannan, A bull and a white cow from Druim Cain. Athelstan, in 930, received running-horses as a present from Germany ; and he prohibited the exportation of English horses. King John imported "one hundred chosen stallions from Flanders." 42 On June 16th, 1305, the Prince of Wales 37 ' Gardener's Chronicle,' 1848, p. 323. 38 Reynier, ' De l'ficonomie des Celtes,' 1818, pp. 487, 503. 39 Le Couteur on Wheat, p. 15. 40 Michel, 4 Des Haras,' 1861, p, 84. 41 Sir W. Wilde, an 1 Essay on Un- manufactured Animal Remains,' &c, 1860, p. 11. 42 Col. Hamilton Smith, 'Nat. Library,' vol. xii., Horses, pp. 135, 140. 18S SELECTION". Chap. XX. wrote to the Archbishop of Canterbmy, begging for the loan of any choice stallion, and promising its return at the end of the season.43 There are numerous records at ancient periods in English history of the importation of choice animals of various kinds, and of foolish laws against their exportation. In the reigns of Henry VII. and VIII. it was ordered that the magistrates, at Michaelmas, should scour the heaths and commons, and destroy all mares beneath a certain size.44 Some of our earlier kings passed laws against the slaughter- ing rams of any good breed before they were seven years old, so that they might have time to breed. In Spain Cardinal Ximenes issued, in 1509, regulations on the selection of good rams for breeding.45 The Emperor Akbar Khan before the year 1600 is said to have " wonderfully improved " his pigeons by crossing the breeds ; and this necessaril}' implies careful selection. About the same period the Dutch attended with the greatest care to the breeding of these birds. Belon in 1555 says that good managers in France examined the colour of their goslings in order to get geese of a white colour and better kinds. Mark- ham in 1631 tells the breeder " to elect the largest and good- liest conies," and enters into minute details. Even with respect to seeds of plants for the flower-garden, Sir J. Hanmer writing about the year 16 6 0 46 says, in "choosing seed, the best seed is the most weighty, and is had from the lustiest and most vigorous stems ; " and he then gives rules about leaving only a few flowers on plants for seed ; so that even such details were attended to in our flower-gardens two hundred years ago. In order to show that selection has been silently carried on in places where it would not have been expected, I may add that in the middle of the last century, in a remote part of North America, Mr. Cooper improved by careful selection all his vegetables, " so that they were greatly " superior to those of any other person. When his radishes, 43 Michel,