aah : OR . ' ve aah at wd : ‘ 4 ROC ' 2 ‘ bah AD A 4 me ‘ Ate ais Lee trys PC ketch ¥ " ek a on Nahe Atal BS Yvavee * ; afepeiote hints te wat Coe) Be, 4 ‘ . ’ i ‘ . ‘ ed vA ' ' , y ' A ; ; ile alata! Oa Wiel “eli Nea ; ei tara a ata NSA SNe, ’ F t ; BUCS CACORE CAT ne i ; a i ’ ERIC E Ye Da ty rk LAS Race ; mat ' ' ’ Ard: t ae Gon a ' , a “i ‘ ¥ ‘yrs +4 ' t 1 4 ¢ fe 8 pring! ‘ ‘ ' Vp Ve ) dete Ash, " ; eppee ’ ' a Oy 1 ye 4s ' ' ' tat Se ) ef . i" 2 ath . . J \ “ a fos Th ¥ ’ . oh SPR patie sooo ; ; : ue Kae , vaca Sy met . q ‘ ‘ : ‘ f . ee ie 1 A hoy ‘ 8 : , x ° ‘ Y “ n ve yale - # ‘ » A yrett Pe . 4 boa f : ayy e Sp’ i \ iene ' Sy } i , : H * . . ’ a ; ‘ ¥ ae , Ag . oa + oe coe ‘ . ’ ' 1 ' A WAL FE ; ' Ke rig’. ; ‘ f GEASS ; . , i ie ne : Pe Tats aay a ROSES Sa fag ontte . ; , LPP Pf ghee pe A, Ae Sah CAPES. LSS Te Pe EDAD Ih fo As ‘ ee, “ LS ee SESE E A ; } PIPE a be ' , , eeey L ; HE BEL te, rs Wk: ' Fe ; tans TOGA Y g “ff i i FIPERIS Gish © PBS Pdi , rte , it y er er, x ‘if 4 ee ' ' , | ‘. Ff Fata ; ; (it fe . eee coe Bott te ; Le Te eon: i Ss the hiy f v ee Shit of be LRA ete ; leg, es. ' 1 asin . ts TAG be ee Vth eae rg Vesa ed Pee nae Bp TALS yo CAA A ae ie Ne deed ie eee ed dae ot Rie PF OWS TTY BS GA Ge Hd 4 > SHS bod SNF a epee iF bie FY Fe. ; Lr ee 450 yn, FOV ES, FAP aries aida Ey. Baie te, ES Ge LI i eh aes PEP ang cin gag oer BU EGE i os ie ae eo | VOAW LE . PORN Tee ee hy Sb -, 439 he FT Pew pb IY WRI IE TG ab PAT WI RS OPT Rae og a Seay i pits ede tf " ».¥ 5 vy Bey $*, RUE YG a Way : Le eee ae an ae eT im ia ee ens f PEAR 5 Bie Oe eA a a Rie S's ered ey: t ire sale Pie hy PAW Osi ty od ny NEN oa indy i i) ie rosea gt HARA Ae j PP ae PEs pate da Malt Veer, AOA eM Ths ae Oo Me WU 0 a ee Oe Be eeu CRA +4 4 = mee = o — ine] — Ss = - f = om ty p) av < =) a = by ‘4 ay = - rad = = i Gif E = = = = “jh = y - 9s - Yy kK 2 m ” m = ‘if 2 = ” es no = z LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI NVINOSHLIWS ~\ASOW, ee ene S VK y LM 7 ‘ y Bo CLL AN Ab Saluvuai LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN i . a 4 JOSHLINS Sa1uvea IOSHLIWS FHSONIAN N Lf > <4 Yin, Nhe NVINOSHLINS S3IY¥VYRS IVER EE EONAEM EES NVINOSHLIWS SMITHSONIAN NOILNLILSNI NVINOSHLIWS | 1! 1BRARIES SMITHSONIAN Le et ae ee eS NOILNLILSNI ¥%, Ws fer LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN LIBRARIES 5 Ys 7 YY / MS ks + iN Te 4 Division of Mollusks A] ) NOILALILSNI_ NVINOSHLIWS Sectional Library wes te y : ili, : Wf 4 Hl : a | E Yi: SIATaVaGRaTT LIBRARTES — Vw (i UvVvVuUwe INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI INSTITUTION NYY S\S NWINOSHIIAS SAiywHaid S NOILALILSNI NVINOSHLINS NOSH.LIWS Wy = IN VIINVJOUTI2I gt Ng ~ SMITHSONIAN SN SMITHSONIAN NVI LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN 711 LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN I NOILALILSNI NVINOSHLINS SSIYVYEIT LIBRARIES x INSTITUTION NOILALILSNI NVINOSHLINS S y y ; n 5 i = o 3 i = qi Ue & a a 4 2 see Bi 2 ow Zz S, uM ~ “AW w Lt }, = < “2 4 c 7 % AQ XN ‘ %, A & i ; ~ = ~ = a a z 7 a NOILALILSNI NVINOSHLINS S3!1uYvVudiIT LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILALILSNI NVINOSHLIWS © ¢ ; a z Pe 5 = nef ie z : : : : Se : : : : > : > Eff * = > | e ~ xD — IG, nfo —_ Po) i = a8 Ke 2s i “iy Be E a E- Ww 5 DS eis : Nati z ei | atl BRARI ES SMITHSONIAN _ INSTITUTION NOES NGS So luvad moti BRARI ES |, SMITHSONIAN I oa wet Re wee z sg A = < = .< = one NS = < z AS = > = Zz SN ae oa ee AS = > > WCE Ko = ro) Be fo) =D yf FS WX = ra) EN 2 i : : 8 Gd EN 3 : a E 2 : 2 “yy Ee Ne E as ee eG Wide Go ; 3 (ap) a 7) ANOLLALILSNI NVINOSHLINS S31YuVvuagIt LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI NVINOSHLIWS § = rr ee) S : S = ae ) i Ae @ a a u 4 X ¢ x = oc = a. “4 wy = 4 gn S of ¢ ay x aa aif if 4 x + 7% (W'S a : = te = « “yp SF ac S WY « : : m 5 a “fe 3 z 5 Ve S) Zz Sy ne) mz J = a aes SS ed PPB RAR TES J SMITHSO IAN INSTITUTION NOILOLITSNI NVINOSHIINS (SSTdVa et 1 LIBRARIES SMitnsonvan | ro) os e) SN Oo a ) ig a a ty ie) — foc} —! — yy; ine} © Gy s S 2 = 2 t GY> 2 Uf : > 2 3 2 Grp ey YF. felt ae = = = a = YF 7 (apie : m Ww m wn = wn’ : m = wo = w z w = 139) 2) =< = ae 72) fe) (2 > za WNYINUVORLIMNS Oat OoOvodit SMITHSONIAN NVINOSHLIWS SMITHSONIAN SMITHSONIAN NVINOSHLIWS SMITHSONIAN NVINOSHLIWS ——— a 5. a iS 3 = a i a ca E > | = > i —— 2 E a = me Wie = =_ () * = ON, NOILALILSNI poaluvad ott BRARI ES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILALILSNI = g Se A Se es Weel ar z + - “ Q : 4 : =, a S 5GY 2G EQS Z Ae) x= (@) ges pa sy oO oe \ Oo (3 es Z “iy EE z = Ze ss = > a = > s > fee (%) a 2) Se 4 Dyes | ia poMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI NVINOSHLIWS $3 luvudly i . = im ce i & : ae i eG # 5 2 = 2 = WS e : } << ?, < EN Ni x i, wc = oc esr WH oc S i) 3 = Yi =) = re za S cl) > s Pe NPINOSHLINS 3 luvUdiT LIBRARI ES_ SMITHSONIAN” INSTITUTION — NOLLM.LILSNI fge ey cS) = S) ey = rh S) VE 2 = 0 = Gy ° = pe =) > £644. =) _ > [= > kK ye fh, », > [= te m - 2 = A te = ne m 2 m a m 2 17 LIBRARIES INSTITUTION NOILALILSNI NVINOSHLINS SSIYVYGIT LIBRARIES -. 2: ee z ee 2 = = 5 GKi, = =| J Zz 2 : z i Wy = = : g 2 8 Yb? 3 pt, ? is 2 is 2 oy Cf fe? ie Zs = ype S > = >” = >" = wo 2 ” 2 @) Zz uw) ny ON NOLLNLILSNI_NVINOSHLIWS _LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION | NOILNLILSNI Ww a W 2 tw 2 i Ww ; i a 25 Y Ea [oa = Ge ~ is | ay i) < a wie = 2 oA < 3 : 2 S ar 5 o Pit as fe} S = fe) aa ra) za 17_ul BRARI ES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILALILSNI” NVINOSHLIWS Salavyaia tl BRARIES oO ae ees) = 2) o Neo = Lif % =o) = Ic = | > EvwZL P a > % ~ > m LS 2G mz on = on mH 77) = 7) = nw eas a ee ON NOIIHLITSN|_NVINOSHLINS (Sa luvda MILLIBRAR | ES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION, NOILALILSNI = << = Pe Gs Ta ne g = it hyp & 2 = t 4 Zo By N2p) 2) YO y dys 2) SO DG vO g ° = So UG ae O 2 O Yui 2 = 2 “yy = Wiz = Zz Yj > ; = Ss = es = > G z i 2p) Ps Zp) * mz a Ps ; I7_LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI NVINOSHLINS Saluvy¥ai7_ LIBRARIES mF) nad AG i Ks ul wn \ 3 = 4 a ON = = j@ » E ¢ us > Ke > ~ Ym s > lem i a E a EKG ® f.> m SAS. 2 rn 2 m 2 SS (22) ae (dp) = wo — M1 LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI NVINOSHLIWS SaIuVURIT_LIBRARIES ie ke w rd in w z w ; Fg Se 5 = Si = ay S = , > | = Zz \, = fp Zz i A De Whi, oO 5 : g WN: 723 z ae i x fe) r WW 6 HF 2 fo) x E : Se cE : : pi > = oS >’ = a | 21) SU a ae oI ip) alist ee wa Rae vom v4 SMITHSONIAN Gig NVINOSHLIV INSTITUTIC EBS NVINOSHLIW \ NS SMITHSONIA NVINOSHLINS S31YVYSITLIBRARI _ NVINOSHLIW z= ag : ww 4 AS see (@) aps Sia. SMITHSONIA a S = a) say - Ww Z ae < ra (@) Ww as eS = 2p) SMITHSONIA! ep) ud . — By ines ’ Of ZY, a Yh a] NVINOSHLIWS ip > oo Po) > Aa m 1@p) Ww i a 3G (ep) (@} = > z Division of Moliusks Gectional “Library { be Lo) ii ay | ee ag Dy, Beer Op , 5 . i 4, is Ry H i) 1 ht } . be f xi* i] ‘ POeLIGER A Quarterly published by CALIFORNIA MALACOZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY, INC. Berkeley, California Volume II July 1, 1968 to April 1, 1969 ea eor = 7 ; a: s iS i 3: H ‘ : g aes | cd bedaidug SS OSSSATAM, 2 nb Re iO OP ONAT EAS ee We AR he ARYAN a RE Se BR ee iS nine apenas se ner. eee * a 4 ,: Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Page III TABLE OF CONTENTS A color variation of Aldisa sanguinea. RICHARD AY ROEBER Ml Vers sissicdeo eee ee aie cosne eens 280 A cowrie mutant from the Gulf of Thailand. FRANZ ALFRED SCHILDER sw... ee ee eee eee eee 34 A list of types of the family Volutidae held by the National Museum of Victoria. BREAN BP pS MIUBEWM ly pcre left alnrcteie cralsustes ote te ale sale sve 39 A method of color preservation in opisthobranch mollusks. (CORDONT AC ROBILLIARD! a). ciescts sate cle ieie oi citlets 288 A method of tagging mollusks underwater. IRIGHARD J ROSENTHAL alee ccs eee ee 0 289 An additional record for Cypraea teres in the Galapagos Islands. WituiaM K. Emerson & WituiaM E. OL, Jr. 98 An annotated list of opisthobranchs from San Luis Obispo County, California. Ricuarp A. ROLLER & STEVEN J. LONG... 424 An emendation. RAW EORDINS GATED) fice ieiald dole ental eletelete 80 An immunological study of pelecypod taxonomy. BMBIARKEVINGFISHER) «ni suc. ceca desis saves’ 434 A new genus and two new species of Typhinae from the Panamic Province (Gastropoda: Muricidae). _ Inline, IDS) Ge ocodanosuasoorGooedS 343 An investigation of the commensals of Cryptochiton stel- ler: (MipEenporrF, 1847) in the Monterey Peninsula area, California. SIEEVELINM IME SIRE Run Mnrtenareiiereiariersiebecicnciae 121 A new Neptunea from the Pacific Northwest. PANTOTE VANE Gr IMELTRET Cu asl yeiatopousileiicers. oiete: sisi olore laude 117 A new record of Corambella steinbergae LANCE, 1962. PRERRENGEMGOSEINER (0) y.'efs it srctvieie vie.’ vin levee sis 147 A new species of enopleuthid squid, Abraliopsis (Wata- senia) felis, from the California Current. Joun A. McGowan & TakasHi OKUTANI aor! Le A new species of Murexsul (Gastropoda: Muricidae) from the Galapagos Islands. WiturAM K. EMerson & ANTHONY D’ATTILIO 324 A new species of Puncturella (Cranopsis) from the north- eastern Pacific. I. McT. Cowan & JAMES H. McLean... 105 A new species of Strombina from the Galapagos Islands. Wiiu1AM K. Emerson & ANTHONY D’ATTILIO 195 A note on feeding and excretion in bivalves. Em TINA NUAINT igi salsa far aiiltas also eTavar a ua railele aya 198 A note on the range of Gastropteron pacificum (Opistho- branchia : Cephalaspidea). Hans BertscH An overlooked subgenus and species from Panama. A. Myra KEEN A preliminary survey of mollusks for Consag Rock and adjacent areas, Gulf of California, Mexico. HELEN DUSHANE & ELLEN BRENNAN... 351 Archidoris odhneri (MacFartanp, 1966) comb. nov., with some comments on the species of the genus on the Pacific coast of North America. ROBERTHBURNs) Hic a cassie: ava veieiee cea NEO 90 A record of the Indo-Pacific cone, Conus ebraeus, in Gua- temala. WIE LTANAKGrE:MERSON). sie ay stitiemciereete 33 A review of the living leptonacean bivalves of the genus Aligena. FVAROLDNWAHEVARRY ys. -hojerereiets > cre oidintes Shel ieee 164 A survey of the littoral marine mollusks of the Caribbean coast of Costa Rica. JosepH RicHarp Housrick Banding patterns in Haliotis - II. Some behavioral con- siderations and the effect of diet on shell coloration for Haliotis rufescens, Haliotis corrugata, Haliotis so- rensent, and Haliotis assimilis. DAVIDyS AOUSENT 9 i ahi) recs creeeioeiets te mheretees 135 Distribution of organic bromine compounds in Aplysia californica CoopEr, 1863. IEINDSAV@ReAVVINIKEERY® are ia-rdeicisisii reine erie 268 Effects of turbidity-producing substances in sea water on eggs and larvae of three genera of bivalve mollusks. Harry C. Davis & HERBERT Hipui............... 316 Familial placement of Hanetia JoussEAUME, 1880 (Mu- ricidae) and Solenosteira Dati, 1890 (Buccinidae). WIEETA MG KS EMERSON) Ue: ojorercie) shores srecaiejeieteiee 1 Feeding behavior of Corambella steinbergae. WANES WMICBEDH® 6 loeesroiccc'siapo)ata sie suckers 145 Five new species of Mitridae from the Indian and Pacific oceans. AAI GMI CATE 50 Beracavsc ots eicle crstwetel 0 ¢s-ceysterctonone te 85 Further observations on the West American Marginellidae with the description of two new species. Barry RotH & EUGENE COAN ...............- 62 Gross anatomy and classification of the commensal gastro- pod, Caledoniella montrouzieri SOUVERBIE, 1869. JOSEPEPROSEWATERWM gyoiiaerya crt aacioirclelere ire 345 Growth characteristics of Acmaea persona ESCHSCHOLTZ. RONBISE NINYip Mateo cise ctotnsiieloictens: ceemekepel termed 336 Growth study in Olivella biplicata (SowErRBy, 1825). RupoLF STOHLER Haliotis pourtalesii Dati, 1881 from Florida waters. @HARTESH) AGUICE Ws fcetreis.n = (ey. deed 140 Invertebrates taken in six year trawl study in Santa Moni- ca Bay. JOHN G CARTISTES| fa |. scr ys tysrecicln cos aca ciak ne et 431 Borkowsk1, MariLyNN — see BorKowskI, THOMAS V. & BorkowskI, THomas V. & M. R. BorKowskI .. 410 IBOSSSISENNETH 2) saree hess @ecieeies oes (150), (445) IBRATGHER MEWIEAL | sarc cusses seni ete eae 334 BRENNAN, ELLEN — see DUSHANE, HELEN & IBURINMSROBERT sp erascaresyoeaa eeeraitrs cue seus encletes rere 90 CALABRESE, ANTHONY & Harry C. Davis... 235 @ARTISER JOH NGG) Il GenecalGas ng is a ccnsian sine 235i CARTON, WPS MES Wa | toyecistsie gets ie erenarens orev ateisvonve 283, 284 CATE CRAWEORDPNEIDT I) ae etieieciee sce 80, 256, 364 GATHER PEAING@ MINT 9 Boo rates ck isratec ch onotste os youll cteleraueinee 85 CERNOHORSKY, WALTER OLIVER _............ 210, 293 COANE UGENE: Ver ol aaancian on tenho ee 277, 281 see also: Rotu, BARRY & COWANPIIRUM Gis rai, 3h cease ae tote cine eiuonsereans 51 Cowan, I. McT.« James H. McLean __.......... 105 Crovo, Mrs. L. E. see: Otsson, AXEL A. & IDZNSAR Os CETARTE ESB Ne mums icuseys wey acyeieteiccceseeteusion tele 182 D’Artitio, ANTHONY see: EMERSON, WILLIAM K. & Davis, Harry C.& HERBERT Hmu ............. 316 see also: CALABRESE, ANTHONY & IDEN PAIVOAIND st] Pn Tis lanes on MSIE ERG rr eG Cena Goin aie 198 D UGE RE ONAGH MEE eerercrie sctovcecianveun eet te socie 415 DuPont, JoHN ELEUTHERE see: WEAVER, CLIFTON S. & DU SEAN SE RISEN Pte peters e orelene, sicvarciain Sieve: pause ee 343 DuSHANE, HELEN & ELLEN BRENNAN ......... B5il LBD WARDS, 1D), CRN cooooncosoonvogccoconcdc 326 EMERSON VMI TAO Ke titers ere 1, 33, (444) Emerson, WILLIAM K. « A. D’ATTILIO . 195, 324 EmeErSoN, WiLtiAM K. & W.E. OLD, Jr. ...... 98 ISISIEDPRAPIGARIKSISVINE 9 | ce Sis tevalereosseie see aide aitvs eee soso 434 IESRVANN AK ORR VV Sie ite a. or eels erica ai reyecoyesreseeh evmvekere taterens 440 GOSTINERMOEERRENCHEa erence se ceiene aie 147 GREENE VRIGEVARD) WW alanine secs oa sien vere ccs eicineeiels. 100 (Cone, CrUNBuIS |, - Wooenoodcancsvovouusoscns 140 lslaawmmenom, Gionen, 15 ~§ soosoounesocsocne0dooc 185 ls leineie, Io Iolo, “epocepeccnpggouscnedonbasu 45 ARR YZ g VAR OLD: Wo aiitsers a cre ocala oreuereceryctereceue ens 164 HENDLER, GorpDon, see: LovELAND, RoBErT E. & THERTEEINS LEORGH o inrierc leis ss «rena cteiare 80, (149) Hinu, Hersert, see: Davis, Harry C. & Housrick, JosEpH RICHARD ............ 2.2.44. 4 Hrena, Marian, see: ANDREWS, J. D., D. TURGEON & [psisisisies WW HOIVEIOS Geo abeonecapdaocoteceuac 144 JOEINISONMKGAY MIN | fens cce cre lesion terior cron 272 ICEEN WAWeMiVRAS © 9 perv creniesieameerecte (83), 439 KENNEDY, WILLIAM J., see: TAYLor, JOHN Davip & Page VI IKENINY, RON) oJ) giesssatiea ghecetay tale aitacweriaagedseuses 336 LEONARD, VERNON KENNETH, Jr. ...... «200s 382 ILONGHS DEVENS) Eo Sei cetacean er 281 see also: RoLLER, RicHarp A. & IL@OGANOme, WiemOR IL; ‘oc agbvoscucdd00b00000s 153 LovELAND, Rosert E.,G. HENDLER & G. NEwxirK 418 Lu, C. C. see: ALDRICH, FREDERICK A. & IMiAcmoRaTm, Xmas 1B Salo do oo dauoacceac0000 399 MacGinitig, G. E. & Nett MacGIniTiE ......... 59 MacGiniriz, Nettie, see: MacGrnrriz, G. E. «& INPSWURERS DON Me ccs cie s,s 8 eacaneisee civesueucrs ceoraen ie 243 Itoh syereae, IOS WWE) Gogenddoobancdscodcdc0 du: 145 McGowan, JouN A. & TAKASHI OKUTANI pees 40/2 McLean, JAMEs H., see: Cowan, I. McT & Miuer, RicHarp L. Moore, Donatp R. & Donatp J. REISH Newkirk, Gary, see: LovELAND, R. E., G. HENDLER & INKZDAIRON, |/IMIIS WWE se oneboGocconoG0Kg0000 50 OxuTAnl, TAKASHI, see McGowan, JoHN A. & Op, WittiaM E., Jr., see EMERSON, WILLIAM K. & @OESEN MDA VEDA: is ea ener epe-ares ote euevey ogsveueereys 135 Otsson, AxeL A. & Mrs. L. E.Crovo _......... 31 IREEDER EARATDIAG. (018s cerhere ere cysts merce euereaete 200 REM WROBERTEG#Bae she. ce cieeusnise tire cctaenon 378 ReisH, DonaLp J., see Moore, Donatp R. & THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 ROBIELTARDs GORDON TAU Eee eee Eee ere 289 ROLLER; -RIGHARD) Ay =). 22 odes omen 280, 421 Router, RicHarp A. & STEVEN J. LonG _.......... 424 - ROSENTHAL, RICHARD J..05 {ya ec oe yee 288 ROSEWATER, JOSEPH. 7) jiecitiei cise eo sees ere 345 RotuH, Barry & EUGENE V.CoAN _............««- 62 SCHIEDER ERANZVATERED eee erie 34, 367 SCHILDER, FRANZ ALFRED & MARIA SCHILDER poo IO) ScHILDER, Marts, see: SCHILDER, FRANZ ALFRED & SmirH, Attyn G9 7 visas: a eee eee 117 SMITH; BRYAN Js.) sG050 siete clei ee eee 39 SOLEM, ALAN = 2° sche a bheteeiele aps st oeeeeneds ete 24 STOHLER, RUDOLF (84); (lol); (156) Zao aie (292), 408, (444) TayLor, JoHN Davin « W. J. KENNEDY TERRY, JUDITH Sd sists ois. bree eee 42 TurcEoNn, Donna, see: ANDREWS, J. D., —, & M. HREHA WASSALLO; MARILYN DT; 9 3 acla nce aGeneeee 223 WEAVER, CLIFTON S.& JOHN E. DuPont... 36 WEBSTER, STEVEN K. | ni. sate os eee eee 121 Witson, BARRY Ri sued ace oa oe eee 340 WINKEER, Linpsay R. 1 adc anlecen one ones 268 Wore; DouGiAS S.o. is has sete ase See 126 Wo trFson, Fay H. A Quarterly published by CALIFORNIA MALACOZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY, INC. Berkeley, California VOLUME II Jury 1, 1968 NUMBER I CoNnTENTS Familial Placement of Hanetia JoussEAUME, 1880 (Muricidae) and Solenosteira DALL, 1890 (Buccinidae) (Plate 1; 2 Text figures) WiLuiaM K. EMERSON Lael A Survey of the Littoral Marine Mollusks of the Caribbean Coast of Costa Rica (1 Text figure; 1 Map) JosEpH RicHARD Hovusrick 4 “Ptychodon” misoolensis ADAM & VAN BENTHEM JUTTING, 1939, A New Guinea Strobilopsid Land Snail and Review of the Genus Enteroplax (1 Text figure; 1 Map) PNWANS OLE Meemmmrermne min Wire Wirt iul ona tan Ne sh oua itis (eb cat a) iene cl ey taille), 2 D4 Observations on Aquarium Specimens of Oliva sayana RAVENEL (Plate 2) AXEL ACL OUSSONMEMVITSs ecm Een GROVOW GE) 62%.) be) eta) lceeminhe el ie ley ieee. a QT A Record of the Indo-Pacific Cone, Conus ebraeus, in Guatemala VBE 1S ERTIRSOR, go 6 igh Bo wot D ouoy la G86" fo) top eaaeo lara acienes A Cowrie Mutant from the Gulf of Thailand (1 Text figure) BRAN ZWALFEREDI SCHILDERVY aricte. um noe) s. eueil te qe ayios jl, ei Siel 6 8 GA The Rediscovery of Voluta (Lyria) grangeri SowERBY 3°, 1900 ~=«(Plate 3; 1 Map) Cuirton Stokes WEAVER & JOHN ELEUTHERE DUPONT. . . ..... . « 36 A List of Types of the Family Volutidae Held by the National Museum of Victoria BRIAN Pp SMUD Eee rst ie rey dol ene MRC TaUn REN lhe) es dey asi lle’ ie hts. 6) <3) 3Q Mediargo, a New Tertiary Genus in the Family Cymatiidae (Plate 4) ODI See UERR Ya umes Mii Cnc memm Ee aie FS se else) ae ae A [Continued on Inside Front Cover] Distributed free to Members of the California Malacozoological Society, Inc. Subscriptions (by Volume only) payable in advance to Calif: Malacozool. Soc., Inc. Volume 11: $18.- Domestic; $18.80 in the Americas; $19.20 in all other Foreign Countries Single copies this issue: $8.-. Postage extra Send subscription orders to Mrs. JEAN M. Cate, 12719 San Vicente Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90049. Address all other correspondence to Dr. R. STOHLER, Editor, Department of Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720 Second Class Postage paid at Berkeley, California ConTENTs — Continued The Role of Behavioral Traits in Influencing the Distribution of Two Species of Sea Mussel, Mytilus edulis and Mytilus californianus (3 Text figures) J. R. E. Harcer Notes on the Food of Conus dalli STEARNS, 1873 James W. NyBAKKEN , The Interrelationships of Certain Boreal and Arctic Species of Yoldia MOLLER, 1842 (Plate 5; 9 Tables) I. McT. Cowan Notes on Cryptochiton stellert (M1ppENDoRFF, 1846) (Plate 6) G. E. McGinirie « Nettie McGIniTIzE Further Observations on the West American Marginellidae With the Description of Two New Species (Plate 7; 2 Text figures; 1 Map) Barry RotH & EucGENE Coan On an Octopod from Placentia Bay, Newfoundland (Plate 8) FREDERICK A. ALpricH « C. C. Lu A New Species of Enoploteuthid Squid, Abraliopsis (Watasenia) felis, from the California Current (Plates 9 and 10; 1 Map) Joun A. McGowan & TakKAsHI OKUTANI NOTES & NEWS Be ee Gea ee MO NED soils aL RAC A cc Tellina ulloana, A New Species from Magdalena Bay, Baja California, Mexico Leo G. HERTLEIN An Emendation Crawrorp N. Cate BOOKS, PERIODICALS & PAMPHLETS . 80 . 83 Note: The various taxa above species are indicated by the use of different type styles as shown by the following examples, and by increasing indentation. ORDER, Suborder, DIVISION, Subdivision, SECTION, SUPERFAMILY, Famity, Subfamily, Genus, (Subgenus) New Taxa Vol. 11; No. 1 THE VELIGER Page 1 Familial Placement of Hanetia JoussEAUME, 1880 (Muricidae) and Solenosteira DALL, 1890 (Buccinidae) WILLIAM K. EMERSON Department of Living Invertebrates American Museum of Natural History Seventy-ninth Street and Central Park West, New York, New York 10024 (Plate 1; 2 Text figures) INTRODUCTION THE GENERIC NAME Hanetia was proposed by Jous- SEAUME (1880, p. 335) with Murex haneti Petir (1856, p. 90, plt. 2, figs. 7, 8) the type species by tautonymy and monotypy. Unfortunately, Petir’s taxon was briefly described and poorly illustrated on the basis of specimens stated to have been collected by Hanet Cléry from the ‘coast near Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. As Wooprinc (1964, p. 256) has recently stated, despite the questionable iden- tity of Petit’s Murex haneti and the lack of confirmation of the Brazilian locality, Hanetia JoussEAuME, 1880, has been employed in recent years for the distinctive group of New World fossil and living buccinids for which DaLi (1890, p. 122) had later proposed the generic name Solenosteira, with the Panamic species, Pyrula anomala Reeve, 1847, the type species by original designation. This group of cantharid-like gastropods is well repre- sented by numerous named fossils, ranging in age from late Miocene to late Pleistocene, that are known from Florida, Panama, Ecuador, Peru, and the west coast of Colombia, Costa Rica and Mexico. Several Recent species survive in the warm waters of the eastern Pacific, ranging from Mexico to Peru (see Keen, 1960, pp. 400 - 402). Evidence is presented in the present study to demon- strate that Hanetia JoussEAUME, 1880, is referable to the Muricidae, and therefore, is not a senior synonym of Solenosteira Datu, 1890, which is referable to the Buc- cinidae. DISCUSSION Although Petit’s original figures of Murex haneti, the type species of Hanetia, suggest an inflated, strongly ribbed specimen of “Pyrula” anomala Reeve, 1847 (Plate 1, Figures 1 - 3), similar specimens were not subsequently reported from Brazil, or elsewhere in the western Atlan- tic. Thus the identity and the western Atlantic occurrence of Petit’s taxon could not be confirmed. MaxweELi SMITH (1939, p. 16; plt. 12, fig. 7), however, illustrated a beach worn Brazilian shell as “Tritonalia haneti Petit,’ which does not compare favorably with Petit’s illustrations. According to Wooprinc (1964, p. 256) this specimen was collected by von Ihering and was deposited in the U.S. National Museum (No. 150767). Lance DE Mor- RETES (1949, p. 94) subsequently recorded “Uvosalpinx haneti (Petir)” from Rio de Janeiro, citing Prtit’s original locality, and he reported this taxon from Santa Catarina Island, Florianopolis, Brazil, citing specimens collected by von Ihering. At my request, Dr. Bernard Salvat of the Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, kindly provided me with photographs of the type of Murex haneti Petit from the collection of his institution (Plate 1, Figures 4 to 6). The holotype was found to be referable to speci- mens identified as “Urosalpinx haneti Petrr” that were collected by Dr. Bernard Tursch in 3 fathoms off Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (Plate 1, Figures 7, 8) and were depos- ited without soft parts in the collection of the American Museum. Through the courtesy of Mr. Masao Azuma of Nishinomiya, Japan, a drawing of the radula of a small specimen labeled “Murex haneti Petr’ from Governa- dor Island off Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (ex—U. S. N. M. No. 364129) was provided me (Text figure 1). The radula, although from an immature specimen, is that of a muri- cid, whereas the radula of “Pyrula” anomala (REEVE, 1847) is that of a buccinid (Text figure 2). THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 1 Figure 1 Radular rachidian tooth and lateral teeth of “Murex” haneti Petit, 1856, greatly enlarged; from a juvenile specimen collected by Dr. Waldo L. Schmitt at Governador Island, Brazil, ex U.S. N. M. No. 364129 (A. M.N.H.No. 142443) On the basis of shell morphology, and opercular and radular characters, Murex haneti Petit, 1856, is, there- fore, referable to the Muricidae, subfamily Tritonaliinae [= Ocenebrinae]. Hanetia JouSSEAUME, 1880, is avail- able for Murex haneti and possibly for other Urosalpinx- like species with similar radular and opercular charac- ters that are placed at the present time in Urosalpinx Stimpson, 1865, or in other genera. Urosalpinx rushiu Pitssry (1897, p. 297), a taxon described from Mal- donado Bay, Uruguay without an illustration, may be a junior synonym of Murex haneti Petit, 1856. Solenosteira Dax, 1890, thus can be retained, as it is the earliest available name for the Cantharus-like Buc- Figure 2 Radular rachidian tooth and lateral teeth of Solenosteira anomala (REEVE, 1847), greatly enlarged; from a specimen collected by Ben and Ruth Purdy at Puerto Pefiasco, Sonora, Mexico (A. M.N. H. No. 141801). Drawings courtesy of Mr. Azuma; redrafted by A. D’Attilio Explanation Figures 1-2, 4-8: “Murex” haneti Petit, 1865. Figures 1, 2: copy of Perrit’s (1865, plt. 2, figs. 7, 8) original figures; Xt. Figures 4, 5, 6: holotype in Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris; photograph through courtesy of Dr. B. Salvat; <1. Figures cinidae of the New World that had been erroneously assigned to Hanetia JoussEAUME, 1880. The generic name Fusinosteira Ousson (1932, p. 179), type species, by original designation: Purpura fusiformis BLAINVILLE, 1832, of the Panamic faunal province, also is available for angulated species of Solenosteira, should these prove to be a biologically valid group. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS In addition to Dr. Bernard Salvat and Mr. Masao Azuma, I am greatly indebted to the following friends and col- leagues for courtesies of various kinds: Mr. Anthony D’Attilio, Mrs. Dorothy Germer, Dr. Miguel A. Klap- penbach, Mr. Henry R. Matthews, Mr. William E. Old, Jr., Mr. & Mrs. Ben Purdy, Dr. Joseph Rosewater, Dr. Donald R. Shasky, and Dr. Bernard Tursch. LITERATURE CITED BLAINVILLE, HENR1 Marie DucrotTay DE 1832. Disposition méthodique des espéces récentes et fossiles des genres Pourpre, Ricinule, Licorne et Concholépas. Nouv. Ann. Mus. Hist. Nat., Paris 1: 189 - 263; plts. 9-12 Dati, WiLtiAM HEALEY 1890. Contributions to the Tertiary fauna of Florida. Pt. 1, Pulmonate, opisthobranchiate and orthodont gastropods. Trans. Wagner Free Inst. Sci., 3: 1-200; plts. 1 - 12. JousSEAUME, FELIX PIERRE 1880. Division méthodique de la famille des purpuridés. Le Naturaliste, Paris, 1 (42): 335 - 336 Keen, A. Myra 1960. Sea shells of tropical west America, 2%? printing. Stanford, Calif. (Stanford Univ. Press) Lance DE MorreETES, FREDERICO 1949. Ensaio de catalogo dos molluscos do Brasil. Arq. Mus. Paranaense 7: 5-216 Curitiba, Parana, Brasil Oxsson, AxEL ADOLF 1932. Contributions to the Tertiary paleontology of Northern Peru: Part 5, the Peruvian Miocene. Bull. Amer. Paleo. 19 (68) : 1-272; plts. 1 - 24 (30 June 1932) PETIT DE LA SAUSSAYE, S. 1856. Description de coquilles nouvelles. Paris, 5 (ser. 2, 1): 87-92; plt. 2 Journ. Conchyl. of Plate 1 7, 8: mature specimen from 3 fathoms off Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Dr. B. Tursch coll. (A. M.N.H.No. 129117); X2. Figure 3: Solenosteira anomala (REEVE, 1847), copy of REEVE’s (1847, plt. 3, figure 12) original figure of “Pyrula” anomala; X1 TuHeE VELIGcER, Vol. 11, No. 1 [EMERSON] Plate 1 s Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 8 WolkeilesINow! THE VELIGER Page 3 Pi_tspry, HENRY AUGUSTUS 1897. | New species of mollusks from Uruguay. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 49: 290 - 298; plts. 6, 7 Reeve, Lovett AucustTus 1847. | Conchologia iconica; or illustrations of the shells of molluscous animals. London, Monograph of the genus Pyrula. 4: 9 plts. + text SmirH, MAXxwELL 1939. An illustrated catalogue of the Recent species of the rock shells. Lantana, Florida: 83 pp.; 21 plts. Stimpson, WILLIAM 1865. On certain genera and families of zoophagous gastero- pods [sic]. Amer. Journ. Conch. I (1): 55-64; plts. 8-9 (25 February 1865) Wooprinc, WENDELL PHILLIPS 1964. | Geology and paleontology of Canal Zone and adjoining parts of Panama. U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof: Paper 306-C: 238 - 297; plts. 39 - 47 Page 4 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 1 A Survey of the Littoral Marine Mollusks of the Caribbean Coast of Costa Rica BY JOSEPH RICHARD HOUBRICK Division of Science and Mathematics , St. Leo College, St. Leo, Florida 33574 (1 Text figure; 1 Map) INTRODUCTION THE COMPOSITION OF the marine molluscan fauna of the western Caribbean is relatively unknown. For a period of six weeks the writer was able to study and collect marine mollusks in two different areasof Limon Province, Costa Rica. The purpose of this work and of the re- search that followed was to investigate the composition and range of the fauna in order to compile a list of the Recent species, to observe their ecological distribution, and to provide some basis for future study in this little- known section of the Caribbean region. Although the period was barely sufficient to allow for an exhaustive survey of the mollusks and the entire range of the variety of their habitats, a good portion of the littoral or shallow water fauna is believed to be recorded. However, more complete and sophisticated collecting methods in these areas would undoubtedly extend the list of existing species and provide further pertinent information. The marine mollusks of the Caribbean coast of Costa Rica have received little or no attention from recent workers. Indeed, the whole of the Caribbean coast of Central America has not received adequate scientific in- vestigation and is poorly known in relation to other areas of the Caribbean Province. With the prospect of a future sea-level canal being constructed somewhere in the Central American isthmus an investigation of the marine fauna of both the Carib- bean and Pacific sides is desirable. A sea-level canal would make possible a limited mixing of the Caribbean and Panamic faunas for the first time since the late Miocene. The area near Puerto Limon presented the most favor- able base for living, transportation facilities, and collect- ing. Consequently, the major portion of this paper deals with the marine mollusks from this vicinity. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS It is a pleasure to acknowledge at this time Dr. Donald R. Moore of the Institute of Marine Science, University of Miami, whose help, interest and suggestions throughout this project have been invaluable. I am also indebted to Drs. William Clench and Kenneth Boss who kindly read the manuscript and offered suggestions. Gratitude is also due to Dr. Axel A. Olsson and Mr. Ted LaRoe who assisted in the identification of some of the fauna. Finally, I am indebted to the Organization for Tropical Studies for the opportunity to collect in some of the areas of Costa Rica and to St. Leo College for both financing the field work and providing leave time for the research involved. PREVIOUS WORK on WESTERN CARIBBEAN MOLLUSKS The literature dealing with the marine mollusks of the Caribbean coast of Central America is rather sparse. This important portion of the Caribbean Province is perhaps the most poorly known by way of actual collection and study. Otsson & McGinty (1958) believed that the principal reason is the scarcity of convenient collecting stations along the Caribbean coast as compared to the abundance and ready accessibility of such grounds on the Pacific side. The earliest literature on the Recent fauna deals with the mosquito coast of Nicaragua and consists of several short articles and notes published by FLuck (1900-1901; 1905). The next reference to the area occurs in 1958 with the work of OLtsson & McGinty in Panama. This seems to be the only substantial report we have about this area. The paper consists of a faunal list along with the description of some new genera and species. Recently, Vole It-sNo; 1 Baxus (1968) has published a comparative study of littoral zonation of the gastropods on the Pacific and Atlantic coasts of Costa Rica in which a brief account of the Limon area is given with a list of the mollusks collected at Portete. With the exception of the above paper and the distributional records listed in Johnsonia, nothing more seems to be recorded of the marine mol- lusks of the Caribbean coast of Costa Rica. Two publications dealing with the southwestern Carib- bean fauna are those by Coomans (1958) and REHDER (1962), the former on the gastropods of the Netherlands Antilles and the latter on the Los Roques mollusca. The fossil mollusca of the western Caribbean have re- ceived more attention by workers. Gasp (1881) and Oxs- son (1922) have reported on the Pliocene and Miocene molluscan faunas of eastern Costa Rica. WooprINc (1957) has investigated the Canal Zone and Weisporp (1961; 1964) discussed the late Cenozoic mollusca of northern Venezuela and provided an excellent bibliography of the Caribbean fauna. In conclusion, a survey of the literature reveals that knowledge of the Recent western Caribbean fauna is surprisingly incomplete and spotty. Further research is needed to gain a full picture of this sector of the Carib- bean Province. REGIONAL GEOGRAPHY AND GEOLOGY The Caribbean slope of Costa Rica is composed of Cenozoic strata which dip away from the central moun- tains to the sea. The eastern coastline is slightly concave, lacking large bays or inlets. The Atlantic coastal plane occupies nearly one-third of Costa Rica and is almost flat. Offshore, the narrow shelf which is rarely more than 10 miles wide, slopes to a depth of 600 feet. The climate of this region is tropical with a heavy rainfall. Most of the northern coast of the province of Limon is low and covered with dense forest interlaced with rivers, creeks, brackish estuaries, and swampy areas of Raffia palms. The beaches are broad and of a gray volcanic sand. An excellent description of this coastline is given by Carr (1956). According to Otsson (1922), there was a complete inter-oceanic connection in this region during the lower Miocene, and nearly all of the Costa Rican isthmus was then beneath the sea. At the close of this epoch, eastern Costa Rica was again emergent for a short period. During the upper Miocene the whole of Costa Rica as well as Panama were in an uplifting process. This elevation de- stroyed the inter-oceanic connections and culminated in THE VELIGER Page 5 the early Pliocene. Thus, during the whole of the Terti- ary, Costa Rica underwent great changes due to periods of submergence and uplift of its land masses. In contrast to the northern coastline, the central Limén peninsula is of a coralline limestone formation. OLsson (1922) and ScHucHeErT (1935) both believed that this outcrop belongs to the Gatun formation. This area is very rich in fossiliferous marls, and Gasp (1881; 1881 a) described about 70 species of fossil mollusks from the Limon area. O_sson (op. cit.) described 334 species from the Gatun formation. FAUNAL ORIGINS anp RELATIONSHIPS The warm tropical waters of the western Caribbean support a molluscan fauna similar to that of the West Indies and the Florida Keys, and are a portion of the zoogeographical area known as the Caribbean Province. WarMKE & AppoTT (1961) presented a map showing the extent of this province. Conditions are fairly uniform, allowing many species to exist throughout the province, and the molluscan fauna is impressive. AppotT (1962) remarked that the larger West Indian islands have over 1200 species of marine mollusks, while the smaller iso- lated coral islands, poor in food, have only about 350 kinds of mollusks. Moore (personal communication) found a depauperate fauna in the Albuquerque Cays off Nicaragua. Otsson « McGinty (1958) recorded about 543 species and subspecies from the Panama coast. We report 250 species herein from Costa Rica. The lower numbers of species from the western Caribbean may indicate a poorer fauna or reflect the inadequate work done in this region. Many species of the Caribbean Province have close affinities to those of the Panamic Province. C. B. ADAMS (1852) was the first to point out the similarities and to draw up a list of analogous species between the two provinces. Dati (1912), in his study of the fossil shells from eastern Panama and Costa Rica, noted that these mollusks were mostly of common Caribbean living forms, but found an interesting admixture of species now living on the Pacific coast. Later, ScHUCHERT (1935) remarked that the Miocene shell faunas of Central America were an- cestral to the living ones of the Caribbean and to some in the Pacific. Otsson (1922) stated that “. . . thirteen percent of the Gatun fauna is identical or closely re- lated to the recent species the majority of which are found living along the Caribbean coast, certain others only on the Pacific side, and a few common to both.” He found 6 species to be specifically identical with forms in the Pacific and 18 others that showed close relationships. Page 6 There were probably two natural seaways crossing Cent- ral America during the Miocene, the main one across Costa Rica and a second through the Darien of Panama. This permitted free circulation of water between Atlantic and Pacific oceans and it was in these warm seas that the Miocene faunas developed which were ancestral in part to the bulk of modern Caribbean and Panamic faunas. Keen (1958) observed that the sizeable number of parallel or analogous species on either side testify both to the slowness of change in the isolated stocks and to their past relationships. Orsson & McGinty (1958) and Orsson (1961) pointed out that the fauna has re- mained little modified in the Pacific section while the Caribbean has undergone a greater change through a major extinction of many of the older Miocene groups due to the drainage of large tracts of its shallower parts during mid-Pleistocene glaciation in the northern hemi- sphere. Other groups later invaded this area from the PACIFIC THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 1 north and east, and present day Caribbean mollusks, when compared to the rich Miocene fauna, appear to be impoverished. COLLECTING LOCALITIES The two areas discussed in this paper are located in the province of Limén, Costa Rica. A map of the area is given in Figure 1. The station most thoroughly worked was that of Portete, a small fishing settlement on the shores of a lagoon located a few miles to the north of Puerto Limén. This is in the central portion of Costa Rica’s Caribbean coastline, more precisely at Lat. 10°N, Long. 83°02’W. The whole area consists of a projection of the land into the Caribbean, the coastline being of a coralline limestone formation and somewhat elevated. It is surrounded by moist tropical forest with a network Figure 1 Vol. 11; No. 1 B3°4' 30" 83°0'00" 83°1'00" 83°1'30" 83°2'00" STATION No. | THE VELIGER 83° 4'00" ——— @ THALASSIA BEDS Page 7 8523' 30: (@) ROCKY AREAS @) TIDAL CREEK ZONE @) MUD-SAND BOTTOM PORTETE Figure 2 of brackish water lagoons and Raffia palm swamps. Collections and observations at Portete were made during the dry season in March of 1965 for a period of 3 days. The same station was more thoroughly collected for a period of one month during July of 1966, the rainy season. The second station, Barra del Colorado, will be treated only briefly because it was worked but for a few days. It is located in the northeast portion of Costa Rica at the mouth of the Rio Colorado, Lat. 10°40’ N, Long. 63-35) W. Collecting was confined to the shallow water or littoral fauna in both stations and included beach specimens and drift material. A face mask was used in the shallow areas and on the reefs. Algae were sorted and picked through for the smaller species and drift material was selected and carefully sorted with the aid of a stereo- microscope for the smaller micromollusks. The Thalassia beds and sandy bottoms were sifted with + inch mesh strainers. When possible, specimens were obtained from local fishermen. No dredging was undertaken, but this would undoubtedly have increased the faunal list by adding more burrowers and pelecypods. COLLECTING STATIONS STATION 1: PORTETE This area (Map, Figure 2) consists primarily of rocky shoreline, surfwashed coves and a somewhat protected lagoon. A small freshwater creek empties into the lagoon and to the north and south of this station there are rivers emptying their muddy contents into the sea. Rainfall Page 8 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 1 can be heavy during the wet season and is undoubtedly a factor in the salinity of the shallow portions of the coast at this time. Unfortunately, quantitative data for many of the eco- logical factors of this area are not known. However, the author’s short experience in the area produced some qualitative information which indicates some factors of possible ecological significance and will serve as a basis for future investigation. No record of the variations of sea temperatures was compiled, but temperatures appear to be typical of the shallow waters of the Caribbean. Values of the oce- anic quadrant 10- 15° N, 80-85° W have been used. In this quadrant, sea surface temperatures average 27.3° C with a range of mean monthly values of 2° (D.R. Moore, personal communication). Very shallow areas become much warmer during the day due to the effect of the sun. The same is true of the local effects of cooling due to the heavy rains in the wet season. Varia- tions, however, do not appear to be.of any significance in the distribution of the common mollusks. Due to the prevailing trade winds (E — NE) there is a consistent wave action. Periods of severe storms cause wave action to become sufficiently intense to damage the plant and coral growth and to destroy certain ecological environments. In sandy areas the author observed mol- lusks torn from their substrate and cast up on the beaches by heavy surf action. Wave action seems fairly consistent around this station. Tides at Portete are diurnal, having a range of 1.2 feet and a mean tide level of 0.3 feet. There are no noticeable strong local currents at this station, but currents related to the wind nearly always flow W -— SW. The ranges of salinity do not seem to be of a magni- tude to be detrimental to coral growth and the typical reef-dwelling fauna. The expected forms of mollusks were found except along the margin of the lagoon area into which the freshwater creek emptied. A water sample from this station was taken and analysis of it showed a salinity of 34.083 ppt. Heavy rains can apparently change the salin- ity in the more shallow portions along the shore and increase the magnitude of the nearby river’s discharge. Turbidity is influenced by the constant wave action. There is a moderate amount of sedimentation contributed by the rivers and creeks near this region. The portion of the lagoon directly affected by the discharge of the creek is devoid of the usual fauna. During periods of heavy rain it appears to discharge considerable quantities of sand and mud, creating a sand bar near its mouth. Bottom conditions in Portete do not vary greatly. The one exception is the lagoon area where substrate con- ditions were extensively controlled and modified by flora and fauna and were quite varied. Substrate conditions at Portete were mostly of 3 types: mud-sand bottom, ‘Thalassia-sand flats, and rock-coral bottom. Intermediates and mixtures of these types were present, some areas apparently in transition from one type of bottom to another, but in general the variations of substrates were strikingly defined. For the purpose of study the writer divides the station of Portete into 3 general areas of substrate mentioned above. A. Mud-Sand Bottom The mud-sand bottom has a fine film of algal growth covering the sediment and is found only in the center of the lagoon; it extends back toward the shore near the creek. The freshwater creek and its mouth are included in this type of bottom. Few mollusks are found on this substrate, but Strombus pugilis is abundant. Water usually covers the mud-sand bottom to a depth of 5 feet or more. No portions of this type bottom seem to be exposed at low tide. B. Thalassia-Sand Bottom The Thalassia flats are all intertidal in nature and prove to be the most rewarding areas in the number of species encountered. The most extensive Thalassia beds are con- fined to the south shores of the lagoon. They consist of beds of Thalassia in the deeper portions which slope upward, forming shallow flats of mixed Thalassia, Cau- lerpa, Halimeda and Porites. The water is seldom more than a foot deep here and with low tide there are periods of incomplete exposure. Along the shore this area appears sandy with large rocks and occasional Thalassia. C. Rock and Coral Bottom Rock bottom environments are the most common and are usually covered with marine algae and corals. They are exposed to the wave action and in some places heavily pounded by surf. In areas of this substrate definite zones characterized by certain flora and fauna are noticed. A zone as defined by Ropricuez (1959) is a “band or region in the shore defined by physical conditions.” Zo- nation was, in many instances, reflected by the types of mollusks found. It is most apparent in areas which are affected by the tides. Substrate, wave action, and the distribution of bottom types are lesser contributing fac- tors in zonation. Lewis (1960) found that tides, with the varying degrees of exposure they impose, are the primary cause of zonation. This certainly appears to be the case at Portete as zonation is remarkably constant in most rocky areas. Mollusks of these zones show varying de- grees of adaptation to tidal factors. That this is due to their larval stages is evident, for the success of these mollusks is not only due to their ability to maintain them- Vol. 11; No. 1 selves as adults, but should be considered as the sum of successes of the various stages in their life histories. For purposes of convenience, rocky areas are divided into 5 zones which seemed to predominate at Portete. This partially follows the zonation system of ARNow, St. Cra, & ARNow, 1963. 1. Splash Zone — the area above the mean high wa- ter levels, including splash pools, areas affected by spray and beach debris. 2. Intertidal Zone — the area between mean high and mean low water levels. An area of loose rocks and stones, sandy-bottom pools and shallow water and fre- quently completely exposed by tidal action. 3. Rock-Ledge Zone — the subtidal shelf that fringes the coast. It is transversed by cracks filled with holes and niches. Heavy growths of Padina, Hypnea, and Acanthopora and other algae are predominant here. This zone is narrow in most parts of Portete; however, in one area the rocky ledges are quite ex- tensive. 4. Reef Zone — this zone is characterized by coral growth and deeper water. At the edge of this zone and along the outer edge of the rocky shelf zone are heavy growths of Zoanthus. Further out Siderastraea and Acropora coral are common. The hydrocoral Milleporina is abundant in this zone. Wave action is generally heavy. 5. Tidal Creek Zone — an unusual cleft cut through the promontory which formed one side of the lagoon. This promontory is heavily pounded by waves on its outer, southern portion. The water thus enters a cleft in the clifflike sides and forms a salt water creek which eventually enters the lagoon and is subject to tidal action. It is a protected zone, always in the shade, and in some places the creek is almost 15 feet deep. The sea urchin Diadema is common on the bottom. Shallow areas are covered with a fine filamentous green alga. STATION 2: BARRA DEL COLORADO An area of wide sandy beaches bisected by the estuary of the muddy Rio Colorado, the Barra del Colorado is bor- dered by wet, tropical rain forest. The beaches are broad and slope gently into the turbid sea. This area is quite similar to that of Tortuguero described by Carr (1956). No ecological data were recorded, but substrate con- ditions along the beaches are of the sand-bottom type. No collecting was done in the estuarine areas, but KELso (1965) found Polymesoda triangula, Mytilopsis zeteki, THE VELIGER Page 9 and Neritina reclivata to be common in the Tortuguero estuary further south. This station afforded a number of species and habitat records of mollusks not encountered at Portete. SUMMARY or SURVEY AND CONCLUSIONS A checklist of the species collected in Limén Province whose presence in the Western Caribbean was previously unrecorded in the literature follows: Arene tricarinata (STEARNS, 1872) Astraea tuber (Linnaeus, 1758) Tegula viridula (GmEuIN, 1791) Puperita tristis (OrpicNy, 1842) Parviturboides interruptus (C.B. Apams, 1850) Solariorbis infracarinata Gass, 1881 Heliacus bisulcatus Orsicny, 1845 Heliacus infundibuliformis (GMELIN, 1791) Petaloconchus irregularis (OrpicNy, 1842) Caecum jucundum Foun, 1867 Caecum ryssotitum Foun, 1867 Caecum cycloferum Foun, 1867 Cerithium auricoma SCHWENGEL, 1940 Cerithiopsis pupa DALL & Stmpson, 1901 Cerithiopsis latum (C. B. Apams, 1850) Cerithiopsis bicolor (C. B. Apams, 1845) Triphora nigrocincta (C. B. ApaMs, 1839) Triphora pulchellum (C. B. Apams, 1850) Balcis intermedia CANTRAINE, 1835 Balcis conoidea Kurtz & Simpson, 1851 Eulima auricincta Apsott, 1958 Stilifer subulatus BRODERIP & SOWERBY Risomurex roseus Reeve, 1856 Anachis pulchella Sowersy, 1844 Bailya parva (C.B. Apams, 1850) Colubraria lanceolata MENKE, 1828 Nassarius nanus UstickeE, 1959 Pusia gemmata (Sowersy, 1874) Marginella denticulata Conrap, 1830 Bullata ovuliformis (Orxicny, 1842) Hyalina tenuilabra Tomutn, 1917 Crassispira fuscescens (REEVE, 1843) Leptadrillia splendida Bartscu, 1934 Mangelia fusca (C.B.Apams, 1845) Pyrogocythara coxi Farco, 1953 Retusa candei Orxgicny, 1841 Aplysia brasiliana Rane, 1828 Aplysia dactylomela Rane, 1828 Cingulina babylonia (C. B. ApAms, 1845) Miralda havanensis Pitspry & AGUAYO Page 10 Lobiger souverbit FiscHER, 1856 Tralia ovula (BrucutzrE, 1789) Arca imbricata BrucutzRE, 1789 Pteria colymbus Ropine, 1798 Crassinella martinicensis (OrBicNy, 1842) Condylocardia bernardi Daux, 1903 Mytilopsis domingensis (REcLUz, 1852) Diplodonta notata Dat & Simpson, 1901 Codakia costata Orpicny, 1842 Acanthochitona rhodeus Pitspry, 1893 Octopus vulgaris Lamarck, 1798 Of the Recent mollusks found in eastern Costa Rica, a total of nearly 250 species were collected consisting of 181 species of gastropods, 35 pelecypods, 3 scaphopods, 8 chitons, and 2 cephalopods. Table 1 illustrates their composition. Table 1 Composition of Molluscan Fauna Fam. Genera Spec. Prosobranchia 43 88 161 GASTROPODA _ Opisthobranchia 9 12 16 Pulmonata 1 3 3 PELECYPODA 19 30 35 AMPHINEURA 3 5 8 SCAPHOPODA 2 2 2 CEPHALOPODA 2 Twelve families are represented by only one species. The families best represented are the Vitrinellidae with 8 genera and the Cerithiidae with 5. The best represented genera are Rissoina with 9 species, Caecum and Cerithi- opsis with 6 species each, and Nerita, Epitonium, and Triphora, each represented by 4 species. Sixteen species of Opisthobranchs remained unidentified. Thirty-five spe- cies of bivalves were collected of which the largest shares were of the families Arcidae and Tellinidae. Table 2 Ecological Distribution of Limén Province Marine Mollusks 1p G A st Sand bottom species 11 0 0 3 Mud-sand bottom species 3 3 0 0 Thalassia-sand bottom species 7 38 0 0 Rock-coral bottom species 8 56 7 0 1 P = Pelecypoda; S = Scaphopoda G = Gastropoda; A = Amphineura THE VELIGER 2 2 Vol. 11; No. 1 A summary of the general ecological distribution of mollusks collected alive follows in Table 2. The mollusks collected in this survey have been depos- ited in the following places: Division of Mollusks, U.S. National Museum; Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University; Museum of the Institute of Marine Science, University of Miami; and in the writer’s col- lection. SYSTEMATICS The following systematic listing includes all identified mollusks collected by the author in Limon Province, Costa Rica. Some unidentified opisthobranchs and many micro- mollusks have been omitted from the list. Although nearly 210 species were determined, this in no way implies a complete survey. In this checklist an attempt is made to record the general distribution of each species throughout the Car- ibbean Province. The stations and ecological areas where the species were collected then follows, together with additional information of interest. Many species were not found alive and are indicated as beach drift or beach shells. The classification used in this paper is based upon that of WarMKE & ApzorTT, 1961. The general geograph- ical ranges of mollusks were taken principally from the monographs in Johnsonia, from publications by WARMKE & AppoTT (1961) and Aspott (1954; 1958). Stations, areas and zones appear after the general range information and are assigned symbols as follows: P — Portete m mud-sand bottom t Thalassia-sand bottom r rock-coral bottom splash zone intertidal zone rockledge zone reef zone tidal creek zone Sac lll 1 = Barra del Colorado 29 66 The terms “abundant,” “common,” etc. indicate the relative occurrence of the species: abundant — 100 or more common — 15 to 100 uncommon — 6 to 15 rare — 5 or fewer Species with doubtful determination are indicated by a question mark in parenthesis: (?). Vol. 11; No. 1 GASTROPODA ScISSURELLIDAE Scissurella Orsicny, 1823 Scissurella sp., P, beach drift. Rare. FISSURELLIDAE Hemitoma Swainson, 1840 Hemitoma octoradiata (GmeuIN, 1791). Range: south Florida and the Caribbean to Brazil. P, r, 2. Found during March in holes and pits on rocks. Uncommon. Diodora Gray, 1821 Diodora listeri (OrsicNy, 1853). Range: southeast Flor- ida and the southeast Caribbean. P, r, 2, 3. Uncommon on rocks. Diodora arcuata (SowerBy, 1862). Range: Florida, the Bahamas and the Caribbean. P, t. Uncommon under stones and dead Porites coral. Common in beach drift. Fissurella BRuGUIERE, 1798 Fissurella nodosa (Born, 1778). Range: lower Florida Keys, southern Mexico and the Caribbean. P, r, 3. Com- monly covered with calcareous algae. Common. Fissurella angusta (GmeEtIN, 1791). Range: the lower Florida Keys, the Bahamas, British Guiana and the east coast of Central America. P, r, 2, 3. Found living in depressions on rocks and exposed flats. Common. Fissurella barbadensis (GMELIN, 1791). Range: southeast Florida, Bermuda, West Indies, and the Caribbean coast of Central America. P,r, 2, 3. Common on rocks and ledges. ACMAEIDAE Acmaea ESCHSCHOLTZ, 1830 Acmaea antillarum (Sowersy, 1831). Range: south half of Florida to the West Indies and the Caribbean. P, r, 2, 3. Found in cup-like depressions on rocks and ledges ex- posed to heavy surf. Common. TROCHIDAE Cittarium Puuiuipri, 1847 Cittarium pica (LinNAEuS, 1758). Range: Bahamas to the West Indies and eastern Central America; north coast of South America. P, r, 3. Commonly found adhering to alga-covered rocks in surf-pounded places; younger spe- cimens were common in the intertidal zone during the month of March, but were absent in the summer. THE VELIGER Page 11 Tegula Lesson, 1832 Tegula fasciata (Born, 1778). Range: southeastern Flor- ida and the Caribbean. P, t. Found commonly on Thalas- sia blades. Tegula excavata (LAMARCK, 1822). Range: Caribbean. P, r, 2. Found only during March under rocks or in sheltered places. Common. Tegula viridula (GmeE.in, 1791). Range: Central Amer- ica and the northern coast of South America to Brazil. P, t. Found in Thalassia beds. Uncommon. Parviturbo Pitspry & McGinty, 1945 Parviturbo sp. P. Beach drift. Common. "TURBINIDAE Arene H. « A. Apams, 1857 Arene tricarinata (STEARNS, 1872). Range: southeast U. S. to the West Indies and eastern Central America. P, t. Uncommon. Common in beach drift. Astraea Ropinc, 1798 Astraea caelata (GMELIN, 1791). Range: southeast Flor- ida, the West Indies and the Caribbean. P, r. Shells only. Fiuck, 1905, found it abundant in Nicaragua. Astraea tuber (LINNAEuS, 1758). Range: southeast Flor- ida, the West Indies and the Caribbean. P, r. One dead specimen. PHASIANELLIDAE Tricolia Risso, 1826 Tricolia affinis cruenta Ropertson, 1958. Range: West- ern Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean to Brazil. P, t. Common; abundant in beach drift. NERITIDAE Nerita Linnaeus, 1758 Nerita peloronta LiINNAEUS, 1758. Range: eastern Flor- ida, Bermuda and the West Indies to Trinidad, and also eastern Central America. P, r, 1. Found only during March. Uncommon on large rocks. Nerita versicolor GMELIN, 1791. Range: Florida to Texas, Bermuda and the Caribbean to Brazil. P, r, 2. Abundant on wet rocks in shaded areas. Nerita fulgurans GMEuIN, 1791. Range: eastern coast of Florida, Bermuda, the Caribbean and Brazil. P, r, 2. Common under rocks in sheltered places. RUSSELL, 1941, stated that this species is found in waters of lower salinity but this writer found it commonly distributed along the rocky shores of the Limon peninsula. Page 12 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 1 Puperita Gray, 1857 Puperita tristis (Orpicny, 1842). Range: Antilles and eastern Central America. P, t. Abundant only in lagoons on stones, dead coral, and debris. Neritina Lamarck, 1816 Neritina virginea (LinNAEuS, 1758). Range: Florida to Texas, Bermuda and the Caribbean to Brazil. P,m. Found only near mouth of fresh water creek. Few live speci- mens taken. Common in beach drift. Neritina meleagris LAMARCK, 1822. Range: British Hon- duras to Columbia and the Antilles to Brazil. P, t. Found on rocks and debris with Puperita tristis. Common. Neritina piratica Russe1, 1940. Range: Central Amer- ica, the Antilles, the north coast of South America to Brazil. P, m. Common in freshwater creek on submerged logs and leaves. Intergrades in color pattern ranged from typical N. piratica markings to N. recliata and N. zebra types, but Russett (1941) claimed there is no inter- grading of species. FLuck (1905) found this species to be common in the lagoons and channels peculiar to the mosquito coast of Nicaragua. Smaragdia Issei, 1869 Smaragdia viridis viridemaris Maurey, 1917. Range: southeast Florida, Bermuda, Veracruz to Yucatan, Mex- ico, and the Caribbean. P, t. Common. LITTORINIDAE Lirrorina Férussac, 1822 Littorina ziczac (GMELIN, 1791). Range: southern Flor- ida to Texas, Bermuda and the Caribbean, the Pacific side of Panama near the canal and South America to Uruguay. P, r, 1, 2. Abundant in splash zone. Littorina lineolata Orzicny, 1842. Range: southern Flor- ida to Texas and the Caribbean. P, r, 1, 2. ABport, 1964, has pointed out the close resemblance between this species and L. ziczac. Littorina lineolata was usually found in wetter areas; it is smaller and of a deeper color. Abun- dant in intertidal zone. Littorina nebulosa (LAMARcK, 1822). Range: the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean. P, r, 1. Found on rocks, trees, and debris. Common. Nodilittorina von Martens, 1897 Nodilittorina tuberculata (MENkE, 1828). Range: south- ern Florida, Bermuda and the Caribbean. P, r, 1. Com- mon in holes and pitted surfaces on rocks. Tectarius VALENCIENNES, 1833 Tectarius muricatus (LINNAEUS, 1758). Range: lower Florida Keys, Bermuda and the Caribbean. P, r, 1. Common on rocks and vegetation. TRUNCATELLIDAE Truncatella Risso, 1826 Truncatella pulchella bilabiata Preirrer, 1839. Range: southeast U.S. and the Caribbean. P, r, 1. Common in rotting vegetation under rocks and debris. RISSOIDAE Rissoina Orpicny, 1840 Rissoina chesneli (MicHaup, 1830). Range: southeast U.S. and the West Indies. P, beach drift. Common. Rissoina decussata (Montacu, 1803). Range: North Carolina to the Lesser Antilles and Central America. P, beach drift. Uncommon. Rissoina aberrans (C. B. ApAMs, 1850). Range: Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean. P, beach drift. Uncommon. Rissoina toroensis (Otsson & McGinty, 1958). Range: Central America. P, beach drift. Uncommon. Rissoina cancellata Putuprt, 1847. Range: southeast Florida and the West Indies. P, beach drift. Uncommon. Rissoina sp. P, beach drift. Common. Rissoina sp. P, beach drift. Common. Zebina H. & A. Apams, 1855 Zebina browniana (OrsicNy, 1842). Range: Carolinas to the West Indies. P, t. Under stones and debris in Thalassia beds; beach drift. Abundant. Alvania Risso, 1826 Alvania auberiana (Orpicny, 1842). Range: West In- dies. P, beach drift. Uncommon. Alvania chiriquiensis Otsson & McGinty, 1958. Range: Central America. P, beach drift. Rare. VITRINELLIDAE Vitrinella C. B. Apams, 1852 Vitrinella elegans Otsson & McGinty, 1958. Range: Central America. P, beach drift. Rare. Vitrinella heliocoidea C. B. ApAMs, 1850. Range: south- cast U.S., the West Indies, and the east coast of Central America. P, beach drift. Uncommon. Cyclostremiscus Pitspry & McGinty, 1945 Cyclostremiscus jeannae Pitspry & McGinty, 1945. Range: Central America. P, beach drift. Uncommon. Cyclostremiscus schrammu (FiscHER, 1857). Range: Volatt- Nort Guadeloupe and Central America. P, beach drift. Un- common. Cyclostremiscus ornatus Otsson & McGinty, 1958. Range: Florida and the Caribbean. P, beach drift. Un- common. Teinostoma H.&A.Apams, 1854 Teinostoma megastoma (C.B.Apams, 1850). Range: Carolinas to the Caribbean. P, beach drift. Common. Parviturboides Pirspry & McGinty, 1950 Parviturboides interruptus (C.B. ApaMs, 1858). Range: South Carolina to Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean. P, beach drift. Common. Solariorbis ConrapD, 1865 Solariorbis blakei REHDER, 1944. (?) Range: South Car- olina to the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean. P, beach drift. Rare. Solariorbis infracarinata Gasp, 1881. Range: North Car- olina to the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean. P, beach drift. Uncommon. Solariorbis sp. P, beach drift. Rare. Vitrinorbis Pitspry & Oxsson, 1952 Vitrinorbis elegans Otsson & McGinty, 1958. Range: Central America. P, beach drift. Rare. Circulus JEFFREYS, 1865 Circulus semisculptus (Otsson & McGinty, 1958). Range: southern Florida and Central America. P, beach drift. Uncommon. Macromphalina CossmMann, 1888 Macromphalina sp. P, beach drift. Rare. ARCHITECTONICIDAE Heliacus Orpicny, 1842 Heliacus bisulcatus Orpicny, 1845. Range: southeast U. S. and the Caribbean. P, beach drift. Uncommon. Heliacus infundibuliformis (GmEuIN, 1791). (?) Range: Caribbean. P, beach drift. Rare. VERMETIDAE Petaloconchus H.C. Lea, 1843 Petaloconchus irregularis (OrBIGNY, 1842). Range: southern Florida and the Caribbean. P, r, 2. Cemented on rocks. Common. Stephopoma Mo6rcu, 1860 Stephopoma myrakeenae Otsson & McGinty, 1958. THE VELIGER Page 13 Range: Central America. P, beach drift. Uncommon. CAECIDAE Caecum FLEminc, 1813 Caecum pulchellum Stimpson, 1851. Range: eastern U. S. and the Caribbean. P, beach drift. Common. Caecum jucundum Foun, 1867. Range: Caribbean. P, beach drift. Abundant. Caecum ryssotitum Foun, 1867. Range: Florida and the Caribbean to Brazil. P, beach drift. Abundant. Caecum clava Foun, 1867. Range: Caribbean. P, beach drift. Rare. Caecum cycloferum Foun, 1867. Range: Central Amer- ica. P, beach drift. Rare. Caecum sp. P, beach drift. Rare. PLANAXIDAE Planaxis LAMARCK, 1822 Planaxis lineatus (pA Costa, 1778). Range: lower Flori- da Keys and the Caribbean. P, r, 2. Abundant beneath rocks. Planaxis nucleus (BrucutERE, 1789). Range: southeast Florida and the Caribbean. P, r, 2. Abundant on rocks. MopuLIDAE Modulus Gray, 1842 Modulus modulus (LinnaEus, 1758). Range: Florida to Texas, Bermuda, and the Caribbean to Brazil. P, t. Screened in Thalassia beds. Uncommon. Modulus carchedonius (LAMaRcK, 1822). (?) Range: Greater Antilles to the north coast of South America and Central America. P, beach drift. Rare. CERITHIDAE Cerithium BrucuikreE, 1789 Cerithium variabile C. B. Abas, 1845. Range: southern Florida to Texas and the Caribbean. P, t, r, 2. Abundant in July; uncommon in March. Cerithium eburneum BruculkRE, 1792. Range: south- east Florida, the Bahamas and the Greater Antilles, to Central America. P, r, 5; t. Abundant on rocks; uncom- mon in Thalassia area. Cerithium auricoma SCHWENGEL, 1940. Range: Florida and the Caribbean. P, beach. Uncommon. Bitttum Gray, 1847 Bittium varium (PFEIFFER, 1840). Range: Maryland to Florida, Texas, Mexico and the Caribbean. P, t. Under Page 14 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 1 rocks and debris in Thalassia beds. Uncommon; common in beach drift. Alaba H. & A. ApAMs, 1853 Alaba incerta (Orxicny, 1842). Range: Bermuda, Ba- hamas, southeast Florida and the Caribbean. P, t. Screened in deeper portions of Thalassia beds. Also found in beach drift. Uncommon. Cerithiopsis ForBes & Haney, 1851 Cerithiopsis green (C.B. ApAMs, 1839). Range: Cape Cod to Florida and the Caribbean. P, t. Common alive under stones in Thalassia beds. Abundant in beach drift. Cerithiopsis regulosum (C. B. ApaMs, 1850). Range: Caribbean. P, beach drift. Uncommon. Cerithiopsis latum (C. B. ApAms, 1850). Range: Greater Antilles and Central America. P, beach drift. Uncommon. Cerithiopsis pupa DALL & Stimpson, 1901. Range: Greater Antilles and Central America. P, beach drift. Rare. Cerithiopsis emersoni (C. B. ADAMS, 1838). Range: Mas- sachusetts to the Caribbean. P, r, 5. Rare. Cerithiopsis bicolor (C. B. ApAMs, 1845). P, r, 5. Screened in green algae on rocks. Rare. Seila A. ApAMs, 1861 Seila adamsi (H.C. Lea, 1845). Range: Massachusetts to Florida, Texas and the Caribbean. P, t. Common under stones and also in beach drift. ‘TRIPHORIDAE Triphora BLAINvILLE, 1828 Triphora turristhomae Horten, 1802. Range: Carib- bean. P, t. Also in beach drift. Uncommon. Triphora nigrocincta (C.B.Apams, 1839). Range: Massachusetts to Florida, Texas and the Caribbean. P, t. Uncommon. Triphora ornata DesHAyES, 1832. Range: Florida and the Caribbean. P, beach drift. Rare. Triphora pulchellum C.B. Apams, 1850. Range: Car- ibbean. P, beach drift. Uncommon. Triphora sp. P, beach drift. Uncommon. EPITONODAE Epitonium Roopine, 1798 Epitonium krebsi (Mércu, 1874). Range: southern Flor- ida to Lesser Antilles and Central America. P, beach drift. Uncommon. Epitonium albidum (Orpicny, 1842). Range: south Florida to Argentina. P, t. Rare. Epitonium lamellosum (LamMarck, 1822). Range: south- ern Florida and the Caribbean. Also Europe. P, beach drift. Uncommon. Epitonium candeanum (Orzicny, 1842). Range: south- ern Florida to the Barbados and Central America. P, uncommon in beach drift. EULIMIDAE Balcis Leacu, 1847 Balcis intermedia (CANTRAINE, 1835). Range: New Jer- sey to the Caribbean. Also Europe. P, t. Uncommon. Balcis conoidea Kurtz & Stimpson, 1851. Range: Flori- da, the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean. P, uncommon in beach drift. Balcis sp. P, beach drift. Uncommon. Balcis sp. P, beach drift. Uncommon. Eulima Risso, 1826 Eulima auricincta Appott, 1958. Range: southern U.S. to Greater Antilles and Central America. P, uncommon in beach drift. STILIFERIDAE Stilifer Bropertp, 1832 Stilifer subulatus BRopERIP & SowerBy, 1832. Range: Caribbean. P, rare in beach drift. Athleenia Bartscu, 1946 Athleenia burryi Bartscu, 1946. Range: southern Flori- da and eastern Costa Rica. P, rare in beach drift. HIpPonicIDAE Cheilea MoverEr, 1793 Cheilea equestris (LinNAEuS, 1758). Range: southeast Florida and the Caribbean. P, common in beach drift. Hipponix DeFRANCE, 1819 Hipponix antiquatus (LinNAEuS, 1767). Range: south- east Florida and the Caribbean. P, common in beach drift. Hipponix subrufus subrufus (LaMaRcK, 1822). (?) Range: southeast Florida and the Caribbean. P, common in beach drift. FosSSARIDAE Fossarus Putri, 1841 Fossarus orbignyi FiscHer, 1864. Range: Caribbean. P, common in beach drift. Fossarus sp. P, beach drift. Uncommon. Wooler Nor STROMBIDAE Strombus LinNAEus, 1758 Strombus gigas LinNAEUS, 1758. Range: southeast Flor- ida, Bermuda and the Caribbean. P. Only a few broken pieces of this species were found. Strombus pugilis LinnaEus, 1758. Range: southeast Florida through the Caribbean to Brazil. P, m. This spe- cies was found in deeper water in the center of the lagoon on a bottom covered with sediment and a fine algal mat. It was abundant in July. The specimens appear to be typical S. pugilis and do not have the character- istics of S. pugilis nicaraguensis as described by FLuck in 1905. Strombus raninus GMELIN, 1791. Range: southeast Flor- ida and the Caribbean. P, t. Uncommon. ERATOIDAE Trivia BRopERIP, 1837 Trivia leucosphaera ScHILDER, 1931. Range: southeast U. S. and the Caribbean. P, beach drift. Uncommon. CyPRAEDAE Cypraea LINNAEUS, 1758 Cypraea zebra LINNAEUS, 1758. Range: southeast Flori- ‘da and the Caribbean. P, r, 2. Found with egg masses in March. Uncommon under large rocks. Cypraea cinerea GMELIN, 1791. Range: southeast Flori- da and the Caribbean. P, beach drift. Common. NATICIDAE Polinices MontrFort, 1810 Polinices lacteus (GutLpinc, 1834). Range: southeastern U.S. and the Caribbean. P, beach drift. Uncommon. Fiuck (1905) found it abundant in Nicaragua. CASSIDIDAE Cypraecassis STUTCHBURY, 1837 Cypraecassis testiculus (LinNaEus, 1758). Range: south- east Florida, Bermuda and from South Mexico and the Caribbean to Brazil. P. Uncommon. CyMATIDAE Charonia GIsTEL, 1848 Charonia variegata (LAMARCK, 1816). Range: southeast Florida and the West Indies. P, r, 3, 4. Usually covered with thick coralline algal growth. Common. Cymatium Ropine, 1798 Cymatium pileare (LinnagEus, 1758). Range: southeast- THE VELIGER Page 15 ern U.S. to the Caribbean. P, beach drift. Common. BuURSIDAE Bursa Ropinc, 1798 Bursa cubaniana (Orpicny, 1842). Range: southeast Florida and the Caribbean. P, r, 2. Uncommon under large rocks in March. ToNNIDAE Tonna BRuNNIcH, 1772 Tonna maculosa (Dittwyn, 1817). Range: southeast Florida and the Caribbean to Brazil. P, beach fragments. Uncommon. MurIcIDAE Drupa Rép1ne, 1798 Drupa nodulosa (C. B. ApaMs, 1845). Range: southern Florida and the Caribbean. P, r, 2; t. Common under rocks. Risomurex Otsson & McGinty, 1958 Risomurex roseus (REEVE, 1856). Range: throughout the Caribbean. P, r, 2. Uncommon under rocks. Risomurex muricoides (C.B. Apams, 1845). Range: Caribbean. P, beach drift. Uncommon. Purpura BRUGUIERE, 1789 Purpura patula (LinNAEuS, 1758). Range: southeast Florida and the Caribbean. P, r, 2. Found in depressions on wave-dashed rocks. Lewis (1960) stated that this species feeds on Acanthopleura granulata, which is abun- dant in this zone. Common. Larger specimens eroded. Thais Ropinc, 1798 Thais rustica (LaMaRcK, 1822). Range: southeast Flori- da, Bermuda and the Caribbean. P, r, 2, 3. Common. Thais deltoidea (LamMaRcK, 1822). Range: Florida, Ber- muda and the Caribbean. P, r, 2, 3. Found on rocks covered with Hypnea and Acanthophora. Common. Aspella Moércu, 1877 Aspella paupercula (C.B.Apams, 1850). Range: Car- ibbean. P, t. Uncommon under rocks and dead Porites coral. MacILIDAE Coralliophila H.& A. Avams, 1853 Coralliophila caribaea Assott, 1958. Range: southeast Florida and the Caribbean. P, t, r, 4. Uncommon. Page 16 CoLUMBELLIDAE Columbella Lamarck, 1799 Columbella mercatoria (LINNAEUS, 1758). Range: southeast Florida and the Caribbean. P, t. Uncommon on Thalassia blades. Anachis H.« A. ApAMs, 1853 Anachis catenata (SowrrBy, 1844). Range: Bermuda and the Caribbean. P, r, 3, 4. Found in colonies under rocks and coral heads. Uncommon. Anachis obesa (C. B. Apams, 1845). Range: Virginia to Florida, the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean. P, r, 2, t. Common under stones. Anachis pulchella (Sowersy, 1844). Range: Florida Keys and the Caribbean. P, t. Rare. Anachis sp. P, beach drift. Rare. Nitidella Swainson, 1840 Nitidella ocellata (GMELIN, 1791). Range: lower Flori- da Keys, Bermuda and the Caribbean. P, beach drift. Uncommon. Psarostola REHDER, 1943 Psarostola monilifera (SowERBY, 1894). Range: Florida and the Caribbean. P, uncommon in beach drift. BucciINnIDAE Bailya M. Smitu, 1944 Bailya parva (C. B. Apas, 1850). Range: Bahamas and the Caribbean. P, t, r, 4. Found under dead Porites coral and in company with Aspella paupercula under coral heads. Bailya intricata (DALL, 1883). (?) Range: southern Flor- ida and the Caribbean. P, t. Uncommon under stones and rubble. Antillophos Wooprinc, 1928 Antillophos candei (Orxicny, 1853). (?) Range: south- east U.S. and the Caribbean. P, t. Uncommon under dead Porites coral. Engina Gray, 1839 Engina turbinella (KieNneER, 1836). Range: lower Florida Keys and the Caribbean. P, t. Found under stones in sheltered areas. Common. Engina sp. P, beach drift. Rare. Colubraria ScHUMACHER, 1817 Colubraria lanceolata MENKE, 1828. Range: southeast U.S. and the Caribbean. P, beach drift. Uncommon. THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 1 Pisania Brvona-BERNARDI, 1832 Pisania pusio (LINNAEUS, 1758). Range: southeast Flor- ida and the Caribbean. P, r, 4. Uncommon. Cantharus Roépinc, 1798 Cantharus auritulus (Linx, 1807). Range: southeast Florida, south through the Caribbean to Brazil. P, beach specimens. Rare. NASSARIDAE Nassarius DumériL, 1806 Nassarius vibex (Say, 1822). Range: Cape Cod to Flori- da, the Gulf States and the Caribbean. P, t. Found on Thalassia in deeper water. Nassarius albus (Say, 1826). Range: southeastern U.S. to the Caribbean. P, beach drift. Uncommon. Nassarius nanus Usticke, 1959. Range: Caribbean. P, t. Uncommon. FASCIOLARUDAE Leucozonia Gray, 1847 Leucozonia nassa (GMELIN, 1791). Range: Florida to Texas and the Caribbean. P, r, 2, 3. Common under rocks covered with coralline algae. Leucozonia ocellata (GmeEtIN, 1791). Range: Florida and the Caribbean. P, beach specimen. XANCIDAE Vasum Roopine, 1798 Vasum muricatum (Born, 1778). Range: southern Flori- da and the Caribbean. P, t, r, 4. Common on rocks and debris. OLIVIDAE Oliva Brucutére, 1789 Oliva reticularis LAMARCK, 1811. Range. southeast Flor- ida, the Bahamas and the Caribbean. P; B. Beach frag- ments. Rare. Agaronia Gray, 1839 Agaronia testacea (LaMarcK, 1811). Range: Central America and in the Panamic Province from the Gulf of California to Peru. P, t. FLuck (1905) found this spe- cies to be abundant in Nicaragua and observed the living animals. Orsson (1958) also listed it from Panama. Tryon (1883) found it to be indistinguishable from A. hiatula (Gmeutn, 1791) from West Africa and added that both species exhibited a wide variation in both color and form. Uncommon, dead. Vol. 11; No. 1 THE VELIGER Page 17 Olivella Swainson, 1831 Olivella minuta Linx, 1897. Range: Caribbean. P, beach drift. Uncommon. This may be the subspecies O. minuta marmosa since Otsson & McGinty, 1958, list it as occurring nearby in Panama. MITRIDAE Mitra Lamarck, 1799 Mitra nodulosa (GMELIN, 1791). Range: southeast U.S. and the Caribbean. P, r, 4. Uncommon under coral heads. Mitra barbadensis (GMELIN, 1791). Range: from south- east Florida to the Caribbean. P, uncommon. Mitra olssoni McGinty, 1955. (?) Range: southeastern Florida and Central America. P, beach drift. Rare. Pusia Swainson, 1840 Pusia gemmata (Sowersy, 1874). Range: Florida and the Caribbean. P, r, 5. Common under rocks and on algae. MARGINELLIDAE Marginella Lamarck, 1799 Marginella denticulata Conrav, 1830. Range: southeast U.S. to the Caribbean. P, beach drift. Common. Bullata JoussEAuME, 1875 Bullata ovuliformis (Orpicny, 1842). Range: the south- east U.S. and the Caribbean. P, uncommon in beach drift. Persicula SCHUMACHER, 1817 Persicula adamsiana weberi Otsson & McGinty, 1958. Range: Central American coast. P, rare in beach drift. Persicula lavalleana (Orxicny, 1842). Range: southern Florida and the Caribbean. P, uncommon in beach drift. Hyalina ScHUMACHER, 1817 Hyalina avena KieneEr, 1834. Range: southeast U.S. and the Caribbean. P, uncommon in beach drift. Hyalina tenuilabra Tomuin, 1917. Range: Florida to the Caribbean. P, uncommon in beach drift. CoNnIDAE Conus LinnarEus, 1758 Conus regius GMELIN, 1791. Range: Florida to southern Mexico, the Bahamas and the Caribbean south to Brazil. P, r, 4. No living specimens were taken. Conus mus Hwass, 1792. Range: southern Florida to the Caribbean. Burcu (1960) records this species as occur- ring in the eastern Pacific at Panama Bay. P, r, 2, 3. Common on exposed rocky shelves covered with Hypnea and Acanthophora. TURRIDAE Crassispira Swainson, 1840 Crassispira fuscescens (Reeve, 1843). Range: Florida Keys to the Caribbean. P, r, 5. Common in shady, pro- tected areas. Leptadrillia Woonrinec, 1928 Leptadrillia splendida Bartscu, 1934. Range: Carib- bean. P, beach drift. Uncommon. Mangelia Risso, 1826 Mangelia fusca (C.B. Apams, 1845). Range: Caribbe- an. P, t. Common under rocks, on Thalassia leaves, and in beach drift. Pyrgocythara Wooprinec, 1928 Pyrgocythara coxi Farco, 1953. (?) Range: Florida, the greater Antilles and Central America. P, beach drift. Un- common. ONCHIDIDAE Onchidella Gray, 1850 Onchidella sp. P, r, 1, 2. Abundant on damp rocks. ACTEONIDAE Acteon Montrort, 1810 Acteon finlayi McGinty, 1955. Range: southeast Florida and Cuba to Central America. P, beach drift. Rare. BuLLIDAE Bulla Linnaeus, 1758 Bulla striata Brucutére, 1792. Range: west coast of Florida to Texas and the Caribbean. P. Common as beach specimens. ATYIDAE Atys Montrort, 1810 Atys caribaea (Orpicny, 1841). (?) Range: from southeast Florida to the Caribbean. P, r, 5. Found on green algae and rocks in shady, protected areas. Common. RETUSIDAE Retusa Brown, 1827 Retusa candet Orpicny, 1841. Range: Caribbean. P, uncommon in beach drift. Retusa oxytatus Born, 1885. Range: southeast U.S. and the Caribbean. P, uncommon in beach drift. Page 18 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 1 ACTEOCINIDAE Acteocina Gray, 1847 Acteocina inconspicua Otsson & McGinty, 1958. Range: Central America. P, uncommon in beach drift. APLYSIDAE Aplysia LinnaEus, 1767 Aplysia brasiliana RaNnc, 1828. Range: Atlantic Ocean from New Jersey to St. Helena. P, r, 2, 3. Found in inter- tidal and rock-shelf zones. Common on rocks covered with Hypnea and Acanthophora. Aplysia sp. P, t. Animals difficult to detect due to light green color and darker green reticulations. Foot white, lightly mottled with purple. Uncommon. Aplysia dactylomela Rane (?) 1828. Range: world-wide in warm seas. P, r, 2. Intertidal zone. Common on rocks covered with red algae. PyRAMIDELLIDAE Cingulina A. Apams, 1860 Cingulina babylonia (C. B. Apams, 1845). Range: Ber- muda and the Caribbean. P, beach drift. Common. Miralda A. Avams, 1863 Miralda havanensis Pitspry & Acuayo, 1933. Range: southern Florida to the Caribbean. P, beach drift. Com- mon. Miralda abbott: Otsson & McGinty, 1958. Range: Central America. P, beach drift. Uncommon. Odostomia FLEMING, 1817 Odostomia sp. P, beach drift. Common. Odostomia sp. P, beach drift. Uncommon. Oxy NOEIDAE Oxynoe RAFINESQUE, 1819 Oxynoe antillarum Morcu, 1863. Range: southeast Flor- ida to the Caribbean. P, t. Animals brilliant green and quite active. Common on Caulerpa. Lobiger Kroun, 1847 Lobiger souverbu FiscuHer, 1856. Range: southeast Flor- ida, the Caribbean to Brazil. P, t. Uncommon on Cauler- pa with Oxynoe. ELLOBODAE Pedipes MituuFexp, 1818 Pedipes mirabilis MiHLFELD, 1818. Range: Florida to the Caribbean. P, r, 1. Common under damp rocks and rotting vegetation in colonies. Tralia Gray, 1840 Traha ovula (Brucutire, 1789). Range: Bermuda, Florida, West Indies and the Caribbean coast of Central America. P, r, 1. Common under damp rocks and rotting seaweed. Melampus Montrort, 1810 Melampus coffeus (Linnaeus, 1758). Range: Florida to the West Indies and Caribbean coast of Central America. P, r, 1. Abundant under rocks and debris, feeding on rotting vegetation. PELECYPODA ARCIDAE Arca Linnagus, 1758 Arca imbricata Brucut&zrE, 1789. Range: North Caro- lina to the Caribbean. P, beach drift. Common. Barbatia Gray, 1847 Barbatia domingensis (LaMarcK, 1819). Range: south- east U.S., the Lesser Antilles and Central America. P, r, 2. Common in large groups under coral and rocks. Arcopsis VON KoENEN, 1885 Arcopsis adamsi (E.A.SmituH, 1888). Range: North Carolina, the Caribbean to Brazil. P, r, 2, t. Abundant under rocks, in large groups. Anadara DesHayeEs, 1830 Anadara ovalis (BrucutiRrE, 1789). Range: Cape Cod to the Gulf States and the Caribbean. P, beach speci- mens. Uncommon. IsoGNOMONIDAE Isognomon LicHTFooT, 1786 Isognomon alatus (GMELIN, 1791). Range: southern Florida to the Caribbean. P, r, 2. Found in large clusters attached in sheltered crevices on rocks. Common. Isognomon radiatus ANTON, 1839. Range: southeast Florida to the Caribbean. P, r, 2. Attached in fissures on rocks and usually closer to shore than J. alatus. Common. PTERMDAE Pteria Scorou, 1777 Pteria colymbus Répinc, 1798. Range: southeast U.S. to Vol. 11; No. 1 THE VELIGER Page 19 the Caribbean. P, r, 2. Uncommon. Attached to rocks in sheltered areas. Found only in March. SPONDYLIDAE Spondylus LinnaEus, 1758 Spondylus americanus HERMANN, 1781. Range: Florida and the Caribbean. P, beach specimens. LIMIDAE Lima Brucuiére, 1797 Lima scabra (Born, 1778). Range: southeast Florida and the Caribbean. P, beach specimens. CRASSATELLIDAE Crassinella Guppy, 1874 Crassinella martinicensis (OrpicNy, 1842). Range: Car- ibbean. P, beach drift. Common. Crassinella guadalupensis (Orpicny, 1842). Range: Car- ibbean. P, beach drift. Common. CoNDYLOCARDIDAE Condylocardia BERNARD, 1896 Condylocardia bernardi (Dat, 1903). Range: Caribbe- an. P, beach drift. Common. DREISSENIDAE Mytilopsis Conrap, 1857 Mytilopsis domingensis (REcLUz, 1852). Range: Car- ibbean. P, m. Found near fresh water creek attached to stones. Common. DIPLODONTIDAE Diplodonta Bronn, 1831 Diplodonta notata Dati & Simpson, 1901. Range: Flor- ida to the Greater Antilles and Central America. P, beach drift. Uncommon. LucINnIDAE Phacoides Gray, 1847 Phacoides pectinatus (GMELIN, 1791). Range: southeast U.S., Texas and the Caribbean. P, t. Common in sand under Thalassia. Anodontia Linx, 1807 Anodontia alba Link, 1807. Range: southeast U.S. and the Caribbean. P, t. Uncommon. Anodontia edentuloides is the Panamic analogue. Codakia Scorou, 1777 Codakia orbicularis (Linnagus, 1758). Range: Florida to Texas and the Caribbean. P, t. Common in sand under Thalassia beds. Codakia distinguenda is a closely related species in the Pacific. Codakia orbiculata (Montacu, 1808). Range: south- east U.S. and the Caribbean. P, t. Uncommon, dead valves. Codakia costata Orpicny, 1842. Range: southeast U. S. and the Caribbean. P, uncommon in beach drift. CHAMIDAE Chama Linnagus, 1758 Chama macerophylla GmMe.tn, 1791. Range: southeast U.S. and the Caribbean. P, r, 2, 3. Common attached to rocks in protected places. Chama congregata Conrab, 1833. Range: southeast U. S. and the Caribbean. P, t. Common as dead valves in beach drift. VENERIDAE Chione MUuH.Fep, 1811 Chione cancellata (LinNAEus, 1767). Range: southeast U.S. to Texas and the Caribbean. P, t. Only immature specimens taken in sand under Thalassia. Rare. Tivela Link, 1807 Twela mactroides (Born, 1778). Range: Caribbean south to Brazil. P; B. Common as single valves on beaches. The Panamic analogue is T: byronensis (Gray, 1838). Pitar Romer, 1857 Pitar dione (LinNaEus, 1758). Range: Texas and the Caribbean. B, common as beach specimens. Pitar lupana- ria (Lesson, 1830) is a closely related species in the Pacific. TELLINIDAE Tellina Linnarus, 1758 Tellina alternata Say, 1822. Range: southeast U.S., the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean. B, on the beach with soft parts. Shell completely pink. Uncommon. Tellina lineata Turton, 1819. (?) Range: Florida and the Caribbean. P, t. Uncommon. Tellina sp. P, beach drift. Arcopagia Brown, 1827 Arcopagia fausta (PULTENEY, 1799). Range: southeast U.S. and the Caribbean. P, t. Strigila Turton, 1822 Strigilla carnaria (LINNAEUS, 1758). Range: southeast U.S. and the Caribbean. B, beach specimens. Abundant. Page 20 Vol. 11; No. 1 THE VELIGER SEMELIDAE Semele ScHuUMACHER, 1817 Semele purpurascens (GMELIN, 1791). Range: southeast U.S. and the Caribbean. P, beach specimens. Uncommon. Semele nuculoides (Conran, 1841). Range: southeast U. S. and the Caribbean. P, beach specimens. Uncommon. DONACIDAE Donax Linnaeus, 1758 Donax denticulatus LinNAEus, 1758. Range: Caribbean. B. Some specimens unusually large. Common, burrowing at the edge of the surf. Iphigenia SCHUMACHER, 1817 Iphigenia brasiliensis (LAMARCK, 1818). Range: south- ern Florida and the Caribbean. P, beach specimens. Un- common. FLtuck (1905) found it plentiful in Nicaragua. The Panamic analogue is J. altior (SoweRBy, 1833). MactTrRIDAE Mactra Linnaeus, 1767 Mactra alata SpENGLER, 1802. Range: Caribbean to Brazil. Also occurs in the Pacific. P; B, beach specimens. Abundant. This species is eaten by the natives. Mulinia Gray, 1837 Mulinia cleryana Orsicny, 1846. Range: Caribbean to Brazil. B, beach specimens. Common. CorRBULIDAE Corbula Brucuikre, 1792 Corbula sp. P, beach drift. Uncommon. PHOLADIDAE Martesia BLAINvILLE, 1824 Martesia striata (LinNAEvS, 1767). Range: west Florida to Texas and the Caribbean. Also occurs in the Pacific. P, in driftwood. Pholas Linnaeus, 1758 Pholas campechiensis GMELIN, 1791. Range: North Caro- lina to Brazil, Caribbean, Senegal to Liberia. B, beach specimens. Common. This species is the analogue of P chiloensis Mouina, 1782 of the Pacific. PERIPLOMATIDAE Periploma SCHUMACHER, 1817 Periploma inaequivalvis ScHuMACHER, 1817. Range: Caribbean. B, beach specimens. Uncommon. AMPHINEURA CrYPTOPLACIDEA Acanthochitona Gray, 1821 Acanthochitona rhodeus Pitspry, 1893. Range: Carib- bean. P, r, 2. Uncommon under rocks and in dark places. Acanthochitona sp. P, r, 2. Rare under rocks. ISCHNOCHITONIDAE Ischnochiton Gray, 1847 Ischnochiton pectinatus (SowerBy, 1849). Range: Car- ibbean. P, r, 2. Common under rocks and in dark places. Ischnochiton sp. P, r, 2. Rare under rocks. Callistochiton Dau, 1882. Callistochiton sp. P, r, 2. Rare under rocks. CHITONIDAE Chiton Linnaeus, 1758 Chiton tuberculatus LinNaEus, 1758. Range: Caribbe- an. P, r, 2. Common in groups under wet rocks. Glides quickly away from light when disturbed. Chiton marmoratus GMELIN, 1791. Range: Caribbean. P, r, 2. Uncommon. This species is quite active and shows a negative phototropic reaction. Acanthopleura Guitpine, 1829 Acanthopleura granulata (GmeE.in, 1791). Range: southern Florida and the Caribbean. P, r, 1, 2. The most abundant chiton and seen everywhere in groups. SCAPHOPODA SIPHONODENTALIIDAE Cadulus Puiippi, 1844 Cadulus sp. P, beach drift. DENTALIDAE Dentalium Linnagus, 1758 Dentalium sp. P, beach drift. Dentalium sp. P, beach drift. CEPHALOPODA SPIRULIDAE Spirula Lamarck, 1799 Spirula spirula (LinNAEuS, 1758). Range: worldwide. B, beach specimens. Vol. 11; No. 1 THE VELIGER Page 21 OcTOPODIDAE Octopus Lamarck, 1798 Octopus vulgaris Lamarck, 1798. Range: Connecticut to Florida, the Caribbean and Europe. P, t, r, 2, 3, 4. Common. LITERATURE CITED AssoTtt, Rosert TucKER 1944. The genus Modulus in the western Atlantic. sonia 1 (14): 1-6 1950. The genera Xancus and Vasum in the western Atlantic. Johnsonia 2 (28): 201 - 219; plts. 89-95 1954. American seashells. Princeton, New Jersey. D. van Nostrand Co., Inc.; xiv + 541 pp.; 100 figs.; 40 plts. 1954. | Review of the Atlantic periwinkles, Nodilittorina, Echi- Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 103 (3228) : John- ninus, and Tectarius. 449 - 464; figs. 55 - 57 1958. The marine mollusks of Grand Cayman Island, British West Indies. Monogr. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 11: 1-138; figs. 1-7; plts. 1-5 1962. Sea shells of the World. 160 pp.; illus. 1964. Littorina ziczac (GMELIN) and L. lineolata OrsicNny. Nautilus 78 (2): 65 - 66 ApaMs, CHARLES BAKER 1852. Catalogue of shells collected at Panama, with notes on synonymy, station, and habitat. Ann. Lyceum Nat. Hist. New York 5: 229 - 344 (June) ; 345-548 (July) Arnow, L., F. Sr. Cra « T. ARNow 1963. The Mollusca of a lagoonal area at Playa de Vega Baja, Puerto Rico. Carib. Journ. Sci. 3 (2, 3): 163-172 Baker, FRANK COLLINS 1891. Notes on a collection of shells from southern Mexico. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 43: 45 - 55 BartscH, PauL 1946. A new genus and species of minute marine stiliferid mollusks from Florida. Journ. Wash. Acad. Sci. 36 (1): Golden Press, New York. 440; 1 fig. Baxus, GERALD J. 1968. Zonation in marine gastropods of Costa Rica and species diversity. The Veliger 10 (3) : 207 - 211 (1 Jan. 1968) BEQUAERT, JOSEPH CHARLES 1942. Cerithidea and Batillaria in the western Atlantic. Johnsonia 1 (4): 1-12 1943. The genus Littorina in the western Atlantic. sonia 1 (7): 1-27; 7 plts. Boss, KENNETH JAY 1966. The subfamily Tellininae in the western Atlantic. The genus Téllina (part 1). Johnsonia 4 (45): 217 - 272; plts. John- 127 - 142 BurcH, JoHN QuINcy 1960. Conus mus Brucuiére. Nautilus 74 (2): 81-82 Buscu, KATHERINE JEANNETTE 1899. _ Descriptions of new species of Turbonilla of the western Atlantic fauna. 145-177; plt. 8 Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelph., Part 1: Carr, ARCHIE 1956. The windward road. York; 258 pp.; 17 figs.; 3 maps CLeNcH, WILLIAM JAMES 1942. The genus Conus in the western Atlantic. sonia 1 (6): 1-40; 15 plts. 1947, The genera Purpura and Thais in the western Atlantic. Johnsonia 2 (23): 61-91; plts. 32-40 1964. The genera Pedipes and Laemodonta in the western Atlantic. Johnsonia 4 (42): 117-127; plts. 76-79 Ciencu, WitiiaM James & Ropert Tucker ABBorT 1941. The genus Strombus in the western Atlantic. sonia 1 (1): 1-15 1942. The genera Tectarius and Echininus in the western Atlantic. Johnsonia 1 (4): 1-4 1943. The genera Cypraecassis, Morum, Sconsia, and Dolium in the Western Atlantic. Johnsonia 1 (9): 8 pp.; 4 plts. 1943. The genera Gaza and Livona in the western Atlantic. Johnsonia 1 (12): 1-9 CLeNcH, WILLIAM James « L. C. Smiru 1944. The family Cardiidae in the western Atlantic. Johnsonia 1 (13): 1-32 CLENcH, WILLIAM JAMES « RutH Dixon TurRNER 1950. The western Atlantic marine mollusks described by C. B. ApaMs. Occas. Pap. on mollusks 1 (15) : 233 - 404; plts. 29 - 49 1956. The genus Truncatella in the western Atlantic. Johnsonia 2 (25): 149 - 164; plts. 65 - 73 1956. The genus Epitonium in the western Atlantic. Johnsonia 2 (30): 249 - 288; plts. 108 - 130 1956. The genera Epitonium (part I1), Depressiscala, Cylind- riscala, Nystiella, and Solutiscala in the western Atlantic. Johnsonia 2 (31): 289 - 356; plts. 131-177 1957. The family Cymatiidae in the western Atlantic. Johnsonia 3 (36): 189-244 plts. 110-135 Coomans, H. E. 1958. A survey of the littoral gastropoda of the Netherlands Antilles and other Caribbean islands. Stud. Fauna Cura- cao 8 (31): 42-111 Dai, WiLtt1aMmM HEALEY 1886. Reports on the results of dredging, in the Gulf of Mexico (1877-78) and in the Caribbean Sea (1879-80), by the U.S. Coast Survey Steamer “Blake”, .. . Report on the Mollusca, pt. 1, Brachiopoda and Pelecypoda. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 12: 171 - 318 1889. Reports on the results of dredging, . in the Gulf of Mexico (1877-78) and in the Caribbean Sea (1879-80), by the U. S. Coast Survey Steamer “Blake”, .. . Report on the Mollusca, pt. 2, Gastropoda and Scaphopoda. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 18 (2) : 1 - 492; plts. 1 - 40 Dati, WittiaMm HEALEY & CHARLES TORREY SIMPSON 1901. The Mollusca of Porto Rico. U.S. Fish Comm. Bull. 20: 351-516; pits. 53 - 58 Eases, NEvuE B. 1960. Revision of the world species of Aplysia (Gastropoda, Opisthobranchia) . Bull. Brit. Mus, (Nat. Hist.) Zool. 5 (10): 267 - 404; 51 text figs. Alfred A. Knopf, Inc. New John- John- Page 22 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 1 FarFANTE, ISABEL PEREZ 1943. The genera Fissurella, Lucapina, and Lucapinella in the Western Atlantic. Johnsonia 1 (10): 1-20; plts. 1-5 (7 August 1943) 1943. The genus Diodora in the western Atlantic. John- sonia 1 (11): 1-20 FiscHer, Paut 1857. Etudes sur un groupe de coquilles de la famille des Trochidae (Fin). 8. Journ. de Conchyliol. 6: 284 - 288 Fiucx, WILLIAM HENRY 1900: Shell collecting on the mosquito coast. Nautilus 14 (8): 94 1901. Correspondence [from Nicaragua] Nautilus 15 (4): 48 1905. Shell collecting on the mosquito coast. Nautilus 19 (1): 8-12; 19(2): 16-19; 19(3): 32-34; 19(5): 55-57 19 (7): 78-80; 1906 - 20(1): 1-4 Gass, WILLIAM More 1881. Descriptions of Caribbean Miocene fossils. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia Journ. (2) 8: 337 - 348 Garcia-Cusas, A. 1963. Systematica y distribucion de los micromoluscos reci- entes de la Laguna de Terminos, Campeche, Mexico. Boll. Inst. Geol. Mex. 67 (4): 1-55 Ho ie, Paut Aucust & CLARENCE FE. DINEEN 1959. Studies on the genus Melampus (Pulmonata). Nautilus 73 (1): 28 - 38; plts. 5, 6; (2): 46-51 Jaume, Micuet L. 1946. Moluscos marinos litorales del Cabo Catoche, Yucatan, Mexico. Rev. Soc. Malac. 4: 95-110 Jounson, Cuares W. 1934. List of marine mollusca of the Atlantic coast from Labrador to Texas. Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., 40: 1 - 204 Keen, A. Myra 1958. Sea shells of tropical West America; marine mollusks from Lower California to Colombia. i- xi + 624 pp.; illus. Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, Calif. (5 December 1958) Ketso, DonaLp P. 1965. A contribution to the ecology of a tropical estuary. Master’s thesis, Univ. Florida, Gainesville, Florida Kress, H. J. 1864. | The West Indian marine shells with some remarks. Rev. Soc. Malac. 5: 6 Lewis, J. B. 1960. The fauna of rocky shores of Barbados, West Indies. Canad. Journ. Zool. 38: 391 - 435 Marcus, ERNsT 1957. | On opisthobranchia from Brazil. London (Zoology) 43 (292): 46-51 1958. On western Atlantic opisthobranch gastropods. Am. Mus. Novitates no. 1906; pp. 1 - 82; figs. 1-111 McGinty, THomas LaDUE 1955. | New marine mollusks from Florida. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 107: 75-85; 2 plts. 1962. Caribbean marine shells. Nautilus 76 (2): 39 - 44; plt. 3 McLean, RicHarp ALFRED 1941. The oysters of the western Atlantic. no. 76: 1 - 14; 4 plts. Journ. Linn. Soc. Proc. Acad. Notula Natur. 1951. Scientific survey of Porto Rico and the Virgin Islands. The pelecypoda or bivalve mollusks of Porto Rico and the Vir- gin Islands. New York Acad. Sci. 17 (1): 1-183; 26 plts. Moore, Dona.p R. 1964. The family Vitrinellidae in South Florida and the Gulf of Mexico. Ph. D. dissert., Univ. Miami, Coral Gables, Florida. Otsson, AxeLt ADOLF 1922. The Miocene of northern Costa Rica. Paleontol. 9 (39): 1-311 1956. Studies on the genus Olivella. Philadelphia 108: 155 - 225; plts. 8 - 16 1961. Mollusks of the tropical eastern Pacific particularly from the southern half of the Panamic-Pacific faunal pro- vince (Panama to Peru). Panamic-Pacific Pelecypoda. Paleont. Res. Instit. Ithaca, N.Y: 574 pp.; 86 plts. (10 March 1961) Otsson, Axet Apoitr & THomas L. McGinty 1958. Recent marine mollusks from the Caribbean coast of Panama with the descriptions of some new genera and species. Bull. Amer. Paleo. 39 (177) : 1-58; plts. 1-5; 5 figs. (10 December 1958) Bull. Amer. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Otusson, Axe A. & Ricwarp E. Petir 1964. Some Neogene Mollusca from Florida and the Caro- linas. Bull. Amer. Paleont. 47 (217): 507-574; plts. 77 to 83 Parker, Rosert H. 1963. | Zoogeography and ecology of some macro-invertebrates, particularly mollusks, in the Gulf of California and the conti- nental slope off Mexico. Vidensk. Medd. Dansk Naturhist. For., 126: 1-178; plts. 1-15 Perry, Louise M. & JEANNE SANDERSON SCHWENGEL 1955. Marine shells of the western coast of Florida. Bull. Amer. Paleontol. 26 (95): 1-318; 40 plts. Pitspry, Henry Aucustus 1946. The type specimens of C.BApam’s Jamaican species of Vitrinella. Notula Nat., Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia no. 162: 1-5; 1 plt. REHDER, HARALD ALFRED 1943. | New marine mollusks from the Antillean region. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 93 (3161): 187 - 203 1962. Contribucion al conocimiento de los moluscos marinos del archipielago de los Roques y la Orchila. Mem. Soc. Cienc. Natur. la Salle 22 (62): 116 - 138 Rice, W.H. « L.S. Kornicker 1962. Mollusks of Alacran Reef; Campeche Bank, Mexico. Publ. Marine Sci. Univ. Texas 8: 366-403; 9 plts. 1965. | Mollusks from the deeper waters of the northwestern Campeche Bank, Mexico. Publ. Instit. Marine Sci. (Port Aransas), Texas 10: 108-172; 16 plts. RosERTSON, ROBERT 1958. The family Phasianellidae in the western Atlantic. Johnsonia 3 (37): 245 - 283; 3 (39): 344 - 346; plts. 136-148 RopricuEz, G. 1959. The marine communities of Margarita Island, Vene- zuela. Bul. Mar. Sci. Gulf and Carib. 9: 237-280; 26 figs. Vol. 11; No. 1 RussELL, HENry DRUMMOND 1941. The Recent mollusks of the family Neritidae of the western Atlantic. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 88: 343 - 404 ScHUCHERT, D. R. 1935. Historical geology of the Antillean — Caribbean region, or the lands bordering the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea. John Wiley & Sons, New York; xxvit+811 pp.; 107 figs.; 16 plts. Stroppart, D. R. 1962. Three Caribbean atolls: Turmeffe Islands, Lighthouse Reef, and Glover’s Reef, British Honduras. Atoll. Res. Bull. 87: 1-149 DE LA TORRE, ALFREDO 1960. Caribbean species of Truncatella. 79 - 88 Tryon, GEORGE Wasuincton « Henry Aucustus Pitssry 1895 - 1896. Manual of conchology 16. Philadelphia TurNER, RutH Dixon 1954. The family Pholadidae in the Western Atlantic and Eastern Pacific. Part I - Pholadinae.. Johnsonia 3 (33) : 1 - 63; plts. 1 - 34 UstTIcKE, G. W. NowELL 1959. A check list of the marine shells of St. Croix, U. S. Virgin Islands, with random annotations. Privately printed; 90 pp.; 4 plts. Nautilus 73 (3) : THE VELIGER Page 23 WarMKE, GERMAINE L. & RoBERT TUCKER ABBOTT 1961. Caribbean seashells; a guide to the marine mollusks of Puerto Rico and other West Indian islands, Bermuda and the lower Florida Keys. x + 346 pp.; 44 plts.; 34 text figs. WEIsBORD, NorMAN EDWARD 1926. Notes on marine mollusks from the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Nautilus 39 (3): 81-87 1962. Late Cenozoic gastropods from Northern Venezuela. Bull. Amer. Paleo. 42 (193): 1-672; plts. 1-48 (5 March 1962) 1964. Late Cenozoic pelecypods from northern Venezuela. Bull. Amer. Paleo. 45 (204): 1-523 Wooprinc, WENDELL PHILLIPS 1928. | Miocene mollusks from Bowden, Jamaica: Part II: Gastropods and discussion of results. Carnegie Inst. Washington, publ. no. 385. pp. i- vii+1-564; plts. 1-40; 3 text figs. (28 November 1928) [p. 224; plt. 13, fig. 2] 1957. | Geology and paleontology of the Canal Zone and ad- joining parts of Panama. U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper 306 - a, b, c: 1 - 297; 47 plts. 1965. Endemism in Middle Miocene Caribbean molluscan faunas. Science 148 (3672) : 961 - 963; 1 fig. Woopwarp, S. P. 1875. A manual of the Mollusca. Lockwood & Co., London; 486 pp.; 272 figs.; 24 plts.; 1 map Page 24 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 1 “Ptychodon’’ misoolensis ADAM & VAN BENTHEM JUTTING, 1939 a New Guinea Strobilopsid Land Snail and Review of the Genus Enteroplax BY ALAN SOLEM Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, Illinois (1 Text figure; 1 Map) SINCE PUBLISHING A REVIEW of Pacific Island land snail distributions (SoLeM, 1959a), I have written several pa- pers (SoLEM, 1959b, 1964a, 1964b) concerning the family position of puzzling genera whose accepted fam- ily assignment produced geographically discordant data. During preparation of major monographic reviews on the Pacific Island, Australian, Melanesian and New Zea- land endodontid land snails, many additional changes in family position have been discovered. The reclassification of Ptychodon misoolensis ADAM & VAN BENTHEM JUT- TING, 1939, as Enteroplax misoolensis is presented sepa- rately because of the great zoogeographic interest in- herent in this change. Basic data on the Strobilopsidae have been summarized by Pitspry (1927 - 1931, pp. 1 - 63 and 1948, pp. 848 to 868). Subsequent descriptions by Ho « LEonarp (1961) of fossil Strobilops from the Great Plains and of the Bermuda S$. (Discostrobilops) pilsbryi and the West Mexican S. (D.) sinaloa by Morrison (1953) do not alter the basic patterns. The family is common in the Eocene to Pliocene fossil beds of Western Europe, but is absent from the European Pleistocene and Recent faunas. Several species live in the United States and Canada south of about 52° N Latitude and generally east of the 100™ meridian. Mid-Pliocene fossils are known from the High Plains re- gions of Kansas and Oklahoma (Taytor, 1960). Rec- ords are sparse for Northern Mexico. Strobilops aenea mexicana Pitspry (1927, pp. 32-33) is known from near Monterrey, Nuevo Leon and Necaxa, Puebla (also see Pirssry, 1953, p. 165); S. stnaloa Morrison, 1953, probably from Sinaloa; S. hubbardi (A.D. Brown, 1861) from San Luis Potosi, Mexico (Pitssry, 1927, p. 49); S. strebeli (Pretrrer, 1862) and S. veracruzensis Pits- BRY, 1927 (pp. 33-37) from Vera Cruz; and S. hannai Pitssry, 1931, from Socorro Island, West Mexico. Stro- bilops strebeli guatemalensis H1iNKLEy, 1927 and S. salvini (TRIsTAN, 1863) are known from Guatemala. There are three peripheral South American records — S. hellert (Dati, 1900) from the Galapagos; S. brasiliana Frep Baker, 1913 from Para, Brazil; and S. morsei (Dati, 1885) from Puerto Cabello, Venezuela. Strobi- lops piratica Pitssry, 1930, from Old Providence Island, S. wenziana Pitspry, 1930, from Grand Cayman and forms of S. hubbard: (A.D. Brown) from Bermuda, Cuba and Jamaica comprise the West Indian records. Data on the above are summarized by Pirspry (1927 to 1931). Two Asian groups complete the known taxa. The section Eostrobilops Pitspry, 1927, consists of 4 species — Strobilops nipponica Pitssry, 1927 from Yonezawa, Uzen, Japan; S. hirasei Prrssry, 1927 from Cheju, Quel- part Island, Korea; S$. coreana Pitspry, 1927, from Pyong-Yang, North Korea; and §. diodontina HEUupDE, 1885 from Tchen-k’eou, China (probably is Ch’éng-k’ou, northeast Ssuch’uan Province = Szechwan, at about 108° 47’ long., 31° 56’ lat.). Enteroplax Gupr, 1899, previously was thought con- fined to the Philippine Islands. There are 5 named taxa representing 4 species, with available data on the pre- viously included species summarized by Pirspry (1927 to 1931, pp. 50-56). Strobilops quadrast (MOoELLEN- porFF, 1893) from Northern Luzon and S. polyptychia (MoELLENDoRFF, 1887) from Cebu Island are easily recognizable as distinct species. Strobilops trochospira (MoELLENDoRFF, 1887) from Mt. Licos, Cebu Island is quite similar to E. misoolensis. FausTINO (1930, p. 116) listed these as “Plectopylis’ in the “Helicidae” together Vol. 11; No. 1 with the endodontid Stenopylis coarctata (MOELLEN- porFF, 1894). GupeE (1899, p. 149) separated Enteroplax as a section, but indicated it probably was of generic level separation. A review of this taxon is presented below. Enteroplax Gupr, 1899 Low conic to discoidal shells with prominent radial ribs above threaded periphery and in umbilicus, sculpture absent on body whorl below periphery. Edge of parietal callus strongly elevated, upper parietal lamella fusing with it anteriorly. Parietal lamellae 2, extending posteri- orly about 4 whorl, upper high and blade-like, smooth or serrate on expanded upper edge, 2*” much lower and usually slightly recessed, rarely with a short and deeply recessed interparietal lamella, sometimes a callus con- necting the inner ends of the parietals. No columellar lamella. Palatal wall with 3 to 10 short to long lamellae recessed about $ to 4 whorl behind aperture, connected posteriorly by a transverse callus. Anatomy unknown. Type Species: Plectopylis quadrasi MoELLENDORFF, 1893, by OD. Originally considered as related to the corillid genus Plectopylis, their strobilopsid nature was recognized by Pitsspry, 1908. References to the early literature are con- tained in Pirssry (1927 - 1931, pp. 50-56). They are not repeated here in the list of references, although in- cluded in the synonymies. While Pirspry (1948, pp. 848 - 868) continued to treat the family Strobilopsidae as monotypic on the generic level, ZitcH (1959, p. 178) raised Enteroplax to generic level. I concur with this decision, since there is a greater morphologic gap be- tween the shell of Enteroplax and those classified as subgenera or sections of Strobilops, than between any of the latter. The elevation of the parietal callus and devel- opment of a threaded edge to the periphery are not extraordinary changes, but their presence in Enteroplax and absence from all other groups of Strobilops, s.1. is sufficient for generic recognition. The 3 Philippine Island species were previously re- ported from Luzon, Siquijor, Bohol and Cebu Islands. A new record from Mindanao is added below. ‘The Misool Island Ptychodon misoolensis ADAM & VAN BENTHEM Juttinc, 1939, proved to be a fourth species. Specimens of Enteroplax quadrasi and E. polyptychia were avail- able at Field Museum of Natural History (hereafter FMNH). Through the kindness of Dr. Adolf Zilch, Natur Museum Senckenberg, Frankfurt am Main (hereafter SMF), it was possible to examine specimens of E. trochospira. Study of the Misool species was possible through the cooperation of Mrs. W.S.S. van Benthem THE VELIGER Page 25 Jutting (Zoologisch Museum, Amsterdam, ZMA) and Dr. W. Adam (Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, IRB). This work was supported by National Science Foundation grants G-16419, GB-3384 and GB- 6779. For preparation of the illustrations I am indebted to Miss Margaret Moran. Mrs. Sandra Rendleman, Mrs. Lynda Hanke and Mrs. Rita Mecko assisted in various aspects of this study. Measurements of the specimens are summarized in Table 1 and enable separation of the entities. All mea- surements were made with an ocular micrometer to the nearest 0.035 mm. It soon became obvious that the char- acters used to separate species — number of palatal lamellae, presence or absence of an interparietal lamella, presence or absence of a transverse palatal callus, and degree of serration on the parietals -— were highly variable and, in certain cases, that species definitions were based on aberrant conditions. Only 26 adult examples were available. A few statements concerning similarities of populations are possible, but considerably more ma- terial will be required before the exact relationships of Enteroplax quadrasi, E. trochospira and E. misoolensis are clarified. The latter species apparently lacks serra- tions on the parietal lamellae, but the two former have the same apertural dentition and are separable only on size and overlapping shape differences that may be bridged when more populations are sampled. Outline figures of the Philippine Island taxa, drawn with the aid of a camera lucida on a Wild M-5 micro- scope, are presented in Figure 1 to indicate the rather subtle shape differences separating Enteroplax quadrasi and E. trochospira. All indications of radial sculpture have been omitted from the drawings, since there is no interspecific variation in sculptural characters and addi- tion of this feature would have been very time-consuming. Enteroplax quadrasi (MoELLENDOoRFF, 1893) (Figures 1b, 1c) Plectopylis quadrast MoELLENDORFF, 1893, Nachr. deut. Ma- lak. Gesell. 25 (11-12): 172-173 — Siamsiam, north- ern Luzon, Philippine Islds.; Gupre, 1897, Science Gossip 4 (39): 71; figs. 54a - 54e; MoELLENDorFF, 1898, Abhdl. naturf. Ges. Gorlitz 22: 122; Faustino, 1930, Philippine Journ. Sci. 42 (1): 116 Plectopylis quadrasi subsp. boholensis MoELLENDORFF, 1898, Abhdl. naturf. Ges. Gorlitz 22: 123 — Bohol, Philippine Islands (nude name) Helix (Plectopylis) quadrast (MoELLENDORFF), HIpDALco, 1891, Mem. Real. Acad. Cienc. Madrid 14: 167 — Buguey, Sitio Siam-Siam en Claveria Sitios Dimacapac y Cabayo en Palanen, Camino de Ambubuc, Prov. Caga- yan, Luzon (not the cited figs. on plt. 156, figs. 9, 10) Page 26 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 1 Table 1 Local Variation in Enteroplax Number of Specimens Ribs Height Diameter H/D Ratio Whorls D/U Ratio Enteroplax quadrasi Luzon FMNH 48337-8 87.344.19 2.13+0.036 3.58 0.068 0.596 + 0.0038 3- 3.66 =0.085 (82-97) (2.04—2.20) (3.42-3.75) (0.588-0.606) (5$-6) (3.45-3.86) Bohol FMNH 48341-2 88.5 = 2.04 2.16£0.044 3.66 £0.058 0.590 + 0.0062 64 - 3.35 +0.097 (86-91) (2.07-2.20) (3.55-3.75) (0.583-0.598) (53-64) (3.17-3.50) Mindanao FMNH 54943 107 2.40 3.68 0.652 64 4.31 trochospira Cebu SMF 9287/6 8 96.8 £1.57 2.32 £0.030 4.140.026 0.561 £0.0070 S§+ 3.63 + 0.050 SMF 118092/2 (90-101) (2.20-2.43) (4.05-4.24) (0.535-0.597) (55-52 (3.41-3.88) misoolensis Misool ZMA, IRB 6 79.8+£8.29 2.63 0.055 4.180.066 0.629 +0.0144 64 4.22 + 0.068 (67-104) (2.43-2.80) (3.88-4.34) (0.573-0.664 ) (5$-63) (4.00-4.45) polyptychia Cebu FMNH 48339-40 4 115 1.48 +0.036 4.03£0.028 0.368+0.0109 53+ 2.83+0.031 (1.38-1.55) (3.98-4.08) (0.339-0.388) (54-54) (2.75-2.88) Plectopylis trochospira var. boholensis Gupr, 1898, Science Gossip 4 (46): 285, fig. 74 - Bohol, Philippine Islds. Strobilops (Enteroplax) quadrasi (MOELLENDORFF), WENZ, 1916, Nachr. deutsch. Malak. Gesell. 48 (4): 189; Pits- BRY, 1931, Man. Conch. (2) 28: 55-56; plt. 11, figs. 11-14 Strobilops (Enteroplax) quadrasi var. brunnescens “MoE L- LENDORFF, WENzZ, 1916, Nachr. deutsch. Malak. Ge- sell. 48 (4): 189 -— nude name Strobilops (Enteroplax) boholensis (GupE), Pirssry, 1931, Man. Conch, (2) 28: 54-55; plt. 11, figs. 1-4, 7-10 Range: Luzon, Bohol and Mindanao, Philippine Islands. Material: LUZON - Tayabas (1 specimen, FMNH 48388) ; Palanan (3 specimens, FMNH 48337). BOHOL — Batuan (1 specimen, FMNH 48341); Vilar (2 speci- mens, FMNH 48342). MINDANAO -— east slope of Mt. McKinley, Davao at 7000 feet elevation (1 specimen, FMNH 54943). Remarks: Separation into two species seems to have resulted from chance inspection of aberrant specimens. The Luzon Island Enteroplax quadrasi was reported by MoELLENporrFF as having only 3 palatals, but 3 of the 4 specimens seen by me had 4 palatals and only one had 3 palatals. Similarly, the form described as boholensis was recorded to have an interparietal lamella and 5 palatals, but all material that I saw lacked the interparietal and had only 4 palatals. The size and shape of the Luzon and Bohol specimens are identical except in whorl count and a Statistically insignificant difference in D/U ratio (Table 1). Without more differences than revealed by study of these specimens, separation of these populations cannot be maintained. Reported differences in parietal serration are a factor of wear after death and correlate with worn versus unworn external sculpture. A single shell collected on Mindanao (Figure 1c) has been referred here provisionally. Although identical in size to the other Enteroplax quadrasi samples, the shell is obviously higher and with a narrower umbilicus. It has typical parietals and 4 palatals. Whether this is another atypical specimen, or is representative of populations that are consistently higher and with narrower umbilici cannot be known without further collections. In the latter case, subspecific separation may be justifiable. Enteroplax quadrasi differs from both E. trochospira and E. misoolensis in size. Other differences are bridged by variation between populations and probably have no great significance. Vol. 11; No. 1 THE VELIGER Page 27 Enteroplax trochospira (MorLLENDoRFF, 1887) (Figure 1a) Plectopylis trochospira MoELLENDORFF, 1887, Jahrb. deutsch. Malak. Gesell. 14 (3): 273-274; plt. 8, figs. 9a-9c — Mt. Licos, Cebu, Philippine Islds.; MoELLENDorRFF, 1890, Ber. Senckenb. naturf. Gesell. 1890: 221; MorELLENDoRFF, 1897, Abhdl. naturf. Ges. Gérlitz 22: 123; Gung, 1898, Science Gossip 4 (46): 285; figs. 73a-73e; FaustTINo, 1930, Philippine Journ. Sci. 42 (1): 116 Helix (Plectopylis) trochospira (MoELLENDoRFF), H1patco, 1890, Mem. Real. Acad. Cienc. Madrid 14: 118, 167 (1891) — Sitio Cambaque en Vilar y Sierra Bullones, Bohol, Philippine Islds. (not cited figs. on plt. 156) Strobilops (Enteroplax) trochospira (MoELLENDORFF), WENZ, 1916, Nachr. deutsch. Malak. Gesell. 48 (4): 189; Pis- BRY, 1931, Man. Conch. (2) 28: 52-53; plt. 11, figs. 5a-5c, 6a - 6e Range: Cebu, Philippine Islands. SS Material: CEBU - Mt. Licos (8 specimens, SMF 9287 /6 paratypes, SMF 118092/2). Remarks: Differences in spire shape and elevation (see Figures 1a to 1c) between Enteroplax quadrasi and E. trochospira are subtle. Extremes of both species show a slight overlap. There is a distinct size difference (‘Table 1) with the height and diameter not overlapping, although the whorl counts are nearly identical. Examined specimens of E. trochospira showed 4 (5 specimens) or 5 (1 speci- men) palatals that were connected posteriorly by a trans- verse callus and showed no structural differences from the lamellae seen in FE. quadrasi. With some hesitation I am accepting them as distinct species. In size, Enteroplax trochospira and E. misoolensis are identical, but the latter is distinctly more elevated, has a narrower umbilicus, the parietal lamellae are not ser- rated above, and averages 4 whorl more. Figure 1 Shells of a: Enteroplax trochospira (MoELLENDoRFF), Mt. Licos, Cebu, Philippine Islands; SMF 9287/6; Paratype. b, c: Enteroplax quadrasi (MoELLENDORFF), b: Palanan, Luzon, Philippine Islands. FMNH 48337; c: Mt. McKinley, Davao, Mindanao, Philip- pine Islands; FMNH 54943; d: Enteroplax polyptychia (MoELLENDorFF), Mt. Licos, Cebu, Philippine Islands; FMNH 48339. Probable paratype. Scale line equals 1 mm Page 28 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 1 Enteroplax polyptychia (MoELLENDORFF, 1887) (Figure 1d) Plectopylis polyptychia MorLLENDoRFF, 1887, Jahrb. deut. Malak. Gesell. 14 (3): 272-273; plt. 8, figs. 8a-8c — Mt. Licos, Cebu, Philippine Islds.; MoELLENDORFF, 1890, Ber. Senckenb. naturf. Gesell. 1890: 221; Moert- LENDoRFF, 1897, Abhdl. Naturf. Ges. Gorlitz 22: 122 —- Siquijor, Philippine Islds.; Gupe, 1898, Science Gossip 4 (40): 102; figs. 55a-d; Faustino, 1930, Philippine Journ. Sci. 42 (1): 116 Helix (Plectopylis) polyptychia (MoELLENDORFF), HiDALco, 1890, Mem. Real. Acad. Cienc. Madrid 14: 118, 167 (1891) -— not the cited figures on plt. 156 Strobilops (Enteroplax) polyptychia (MoELLENDORFF) , Wenz, 1916, Nachr. deut. Malak. Gesell. 48 (4): 188 to 189; Pmussry, 1931, Man. Conch. (2) 28: 52; plt. 12, figs. 14-16 Range: Cebu and Siquijor, Philippine Islands. Material: CEBU - Mt. Licos (3 specimens, FMNH 48339, probable paratypes) ; Barili (1 specimen, FMNH 48340). Remarks: No Siquijor material was seen, but I have no reason to question MoELLENDorFF’s identification. In its greatly depressed shape and wider umbilicus, Enteroplax polyptychia is immediately separable from the other spe- cies. Although described as having about 9-10 minute palatal lamellae, 2 of the 3 examples checked had the typical 3 or 4 palatals found in other Enteroplax. Although obviously distinctive, the depressed spire and wider um- bilicus are linked characters caused by the change in coiling pattern. Since the tooth pattern as originally described is known to be aberrant, this species is now shown to differ only in the single linked pair of changes. Enteroplax misoolensis (ADAM & VAN BENTHEM JUTTING, 1939) Ptychodon (Nesophila) misoolensis ADAM & VAN BENTHEM Jurtinc, 1939, Bull. Mus. Roy. Hist. Nat. Belg. 15 (17) : 1-3; fig. 1 — forest 10 km north of Lilinta, Misool Is., in Asplenium; ApAM & LELoup, 1939, Mem. Mus. Roy. Hist. Nat. Belg. (hors ser.) 2 (20): 16; plt. 2, fig. 9 Ptychodon misoolensis ADAM & VAN BENTHEM JUTTING, 1958, Nova Guinea 9 (2): 327 Nesophila misoolensis (ADAM & VAN BENTHEM JUTTING), VAN BENTHEM Jurtine, 1964, Nova Guinea 26: 11 Diagnosis: Shell large, diameter 3.89-4.35mm (mean 4.18mm) with 5% - 63 tightly coiled whorls. Apex and spire strongly elevated, slightly rounded above, H/D ratio 0.573 - 0.664 (mean 0.629). Umbilicus broadly “U”- shaped, barely decoiling, contained 4.00-4.45 times (mean 4.22) in the diameter, with somewhat shouldered margins. Upper surface of shell with irregularly protrac- tive radial ribs, 67 - 104 (mean 79.8) on the last whorl, whose interstices are less than twice their width. Major ribs absent from below periphery of body whorl but re- appearing within umbilicus. Periphery of body whorl protrudingly and narrowly keeled. Aperture ovate, in- clined about 25° from the shell axis. Parietal lamellae 2, extending well beyond line of vision: upper high, blade- like, attaining its greatest height at anterior end, becom- ing bifurcated and forming raised edge to parietal callus; lower less than 4 the height of the upper, stopping short of parietal callus edge. Palatal wall with 4-5 short la- mellae recessed */:; to 4 whorl within aperture. The smooth parietal lamellae, moderately narrower umbilicus, slightly more elevated spire and higher whorl count separate Enteroplax misoolensis from the Philip- pine E. trochospira. Enteroplax quadrasi is perhaps most similar in shape, but differs in its smaller size and serrated parietal lamellae. Description: Shell large, with 64 tightly coiled whorls. Apex and spire strongly and almost evenly elevated, slightly rounded above, H/D ratio 0.621. Apical whorls 13, sculpture of vaguely radially oriented granulosities. Remaining whorls with prominent, irregularly shaped, protractive radial ribs, about 67 on the body whorl, which are much less prominent near the suture and absent from the body whorl below the narrow periphery, but reap- pear within the umbilicus. Microsculpture of vaguely reticulated radial and spiral riblets, often obscured by changes in the major growth wrinkles. Umbilicus broadly “U-shaped, regularly decoiling, contained 4.26 times in the diameter. Sutures relatively shallow, whorls moder- ately rounded above, somewhat flattened laterally below periphery. Aperture ovate, lip strongly thickened and re- flected, inclined about 25° from shell axis. Parietal wall with heavy callus and 2 lamellae extending posteriorly beyond line of vision: upper parietal high, bladelike, sharply descending near anterior margin, then bifurcat- ing to form a raised edge to parietal callus; lower parietal much reduced in height, ridgelike, extending not quite to edge of parietal callus. Columellar wall without lamel- lae. Palatal wall with 4 lamellae visible from aperture, a 5™ seen through the shell, recessed */:s to + whorl within aperture. Uppermost tooth thin, low, very short; 2°” much higher, slightly expanded above and longer; 3°’ even more prominent; 4™ slightly reduced in height and length; 5™ trace apparently even shorter. Height of holotype 2.70mm, diameter 4.35 mm. Holotype: New Guinea: Misool Island. Collected Feb- ruary 26, 1929 in forest 10 km north of Lilinta, on Asplenium. Musée Royal d’Histoire Naturelle de Bel- gique no. 9223. Vol. 11; No. 1 _THE VELIGER Page 29 QUELPART® WV £ostrobilops * Enteroplax v * Chungking Figure 2 Distribution of Enteroplax (gg) and Strobilops (Eostrobilops) (‘p) Page 30 THE VELIGER Vol: 1 Nomi Paratypes: ZMA and IRB. Range: Misool Island. Known from near Lilinta, Waima and Fakal. Material: MISOOL - 10km north of Lilinta (4 spe- cimens, ZMA, IRB) ; Waima (3 specimens, ZMA) ; Fa- kal (1 specimen, ZMA). Remarks: Although identical to Enteroplax trochospira in size, the absence of any serrations on the upper parietal, distinctly narrower umbilicus, proportionately higher spire, and presence of a half whorl more at the same diameters separate E. misoolensis. Only 4 examples had the aperture clear enough or the body whorl sufh- ciently transparent to enable counting the palatal lamel- lae — one had 5 palatals and 3 had 4 palatals. ZOOGEOGRAPHY Prior to the discovery that Enteroplax was present on Misool Island, the distribution of Asian Strobilopsidae appeared anomalous. Species of the section Eostrobilops were known from China, Korea and Japan (see Map) with the Philippine Islands containing an endemic sub- genus, Enteroplax. Viewed from a North Pole perspec- tive, as in Prrspry (1927 - 1931, p. 15, fig. 2), a deriva- tion of the Philippine Enteroplax from the north, using the deus ex machina of accidental transport on the feathers of birds would seem logical and reasonable. Extension of the known distribution to Misool Island is highly significant in that it brings the probable derivation of Enteroplax into the typical pattern of 1) movement from southeast Asia into Indonesia; 2) reaching the Philippines and Misool; and 3) followed by replacement in the Indonesian area leaving the isolated populations in Misool and the Philippines. Almost certainly popula- tions will be found in New Guinea. Specimens of Eostrobilops lack the raised parietal cal- lus and the peripheral thread, plus having the parietal lamellae with superior serrated nodes (see Pitspry, 1927 - 1931, pl. 10, fig. 14). Enteroplax and Eostrobilops are not closely related to each other and their geographic juxtaposition has no systematic significance. LITERATURE CITED Apam, WILLIAM & T. vAN BENTHEM JUTTING 1939. Une nouvelle espéce de Ptychodon de VArchipel In- dien. Bull. Musée roy. d’hist. nat. Belg. 15 (17): 1-3; fig. 1 (April 1939) FaustTINo, LEopotpo A. 1930. Summary of Philippine land shells. Sci. 42 (1): 85-198 Gupe, GrErarp K. 1898. | Armature of helicoid landshells. Philipp. Journ. (May 1930) Sci. Gossip 4 (46): 284 - 285 (March 1898) 1899. Armature of helicoid landshells. Sci. Gossip 6 (66): 174-177 (November 1899) Ho, Tonc-Yun « ARTHUR Byron LEONARD 1961. Two new strobilopsids from the Pleistocene of the high plains. Nautilus 75 (2): 43-49; plt. 6; 5 figs. (4 October 1961) Morrison, JosEPH PauL ELDRED 1953. Two new American species of Strobilops. 67 (2): 53-55; plt. 6 Pirspry, HENry AuGUSTUS 1908. | Notes on the genus Strobilops. Nautilus (11 November 1953) Nautilus 22 (8): 78 - 80 (11 December 1908) 1927 - 1931. Manual of conchology (2) 28 (1-2): 1-96; plts. 1-12 1948. Land Mollusca of North America (north of Mexico). Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia Monogr. 3, 2 (2): i-xlvii + 521-1113; figs. 282 - 585 (19 March 1948) 1953. Inland Mollusca of northern Mexico. II. Urocoptidae, Pupillidae, Strobilopsidae, Valloniidae, and Cionellidae. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 105: 133 - 167; plts. 3-10; 3 figs. (9 December 1953) SoLeM, ALAN 1959a. Systematics and zoogeography of the land and fresh- water Mollusca of the New Hebrides. 43: 359 pp.; 34 plts.; 38 figs.; 18 tables (15 Oct. 1959) 1959b. On the family position of some Palau, New Guinea, and Queensland land snails. Arch. f. Molluskenk. 88: 151 to 158; plts. 12-13; 2 figs. (21 December 1959) 1964a. Amimopina, an Australian enid land snail. The Veliger 6 (3): 115 - 120; 4 text figs. (1 January 1964) 1964b Foxidonta, a Solomon Island trochomorphid land snail. The Veliger 6 (3) : 120- 123; 5 text figs. (1 January 1964) TayLor, DwicHtT WILLARD 1960. Late Cenozoic molluscan faunas from the high plains. U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. 337: 94 pp.; 4 plts.; 2 text figs.; 19 tables ZiLcH, ADOLF 1959. Handbuch der Palaozoologie. 2 (1): Berlin, Germany (Gebr. Borntraeger) Fieldiana: Zoology 1-200; 701 figs. Vol. 11; No. 1 THE VELIGER Page 31 Observations on Aquarium Specimens of Oliva sayana RAVENEL AXEL A. OLSSON 1906 Ferdinand Street, Coral Gables, Florida AND Bonoe Mrs. L. E. CROVO 2915 S W 102” Avenue, Miami, Florida 33165 (Plate 2) INTRODUCTION Oliva sayana 1S THE COMMON, large Oliva in Florida occurring along both coasts, and in some localities quite plentifully although like Olivella nivea Gmeuin, 1791, fast disappearing in others. It is an excellent aquarium snail with interesting habits and will thrive for many years with minimum attention. Essential is a fairly large or spacious tank of sea water, provided with a deep sand layer, the water kept fresh and well aerated and on occasions changed when cleaning is required. Normally, the snail lies buried in the sand out of sight, the siphonal tube generally protruding above, straight as a stick, or swinging back and forth as if to keep track of what may be taking place above. At meal time, the snails will emerge obediently and accept a great variety of animal food, such as pieces of fish, shrimp, steak, and best of all, other live mollusks such as Nassarius, Donax and Laevicardium. Olives have long been known to be both scavengers as well as active predators on other mollusks but the actual manner of food capture remained imper- fectly known. The following notes record some of our observations along this line made over a period of several years. SNAIL WATCHING In July 1967, our pastime of Snail Watching became even more exciting when several of our aquarium in- mates began to produce egg capsules in a seemingly endless procession, a performance repeated at intervals for about three months. Although the egg capsules of Olivella and its veligers have been described in detail by Marcus in Brazil, those of Oliva itself remained unre- corded at far as we have been able to learn. We are offering a few illustrations based on photographs; those of the veligers are experimental and were taken under rather high power. Since a live veliger is a very active little creature, passing in and out of the limited field of view and at different levels, instantaneous exposures were taken and only partial focus secured. FOOD HABITS Several years ago the senior author observed Agaronia preying on Olivella on a beach near Manta, Ecuador. After capture of an Olivella, the body of the Agaronia would swell up into a rounded ball suggesting that the smaller animal had been directly swallowed. Gently squeezing the body of the Agaronia, the Olivella would pop out, and placed in a dish of sea water, would quickly recover. As these observations were made in the field, incidental to more pressing duties, it is possible that a mistaken interpretation had been made as suggested by Marcus (1959). That small mollusks, such as Ervilia, Semelina, Caecum, as well as ostracods and foraminifera, are habitually swallowed by several species of Olivella (O. nivea (GMELIN, 1791), O. gracilis (BRoDERIP & Sow- ERBY, 1829), etc.) is proved, since their shells are com- monly found intact and empty in the digestive tract on dissection. Logically, Oliva should be able to do the same with even larger forms; but additional obser- vations on this subject are required. Even if the food pieces are large, the following procedure is normal. If pieces of fish, shrimp, or steak be placed in the tank, the Olives soon become aware of them and will begin to emerge and start on a round of investigation. When the food morsel is discovered, it is quickly seized and pushed Page 32 back under the foot and infolded in its hinder section as if tucked away in a pocket, which swells up into a rounded ball, the food item hidden away so completely that no part of it is visible externally. The Olive then retreats below sand level, going down head-first. The same procedure is used with live mollusks, such as Donax and Laevicardium, to which latter Oliva sayana is espe- cially partial. A L. vitellinum (Reeve, 1844), if placed in the tank, seems to become aware of a lurking danger and will flip about energetically, especially if pursued by an Olive. Large Laevicardium, nearly the size of the Olive, may be taken, infolded in the foot, and carried under- ground. Clams with a rough surface, such as Chione can- cellata (LinNAEus, 1767), are consistently rejected. EGG CAPSULES ann VELIGERS On July 13, 1967, the junior author noticed that one large Oliva had emerged and seemed to be acting rather peculiarly, the lobes of its mantle loose and flabby. At the same time, the surface of the sand appeared as if covered with small, crystal-clear balls, which like minia- ture balloons swayed and shifted about with the least agitation of the tank water. These balls proved to be transparent egg capsules containing minute white eggs, the capsules varying in shape from nearly spherical to oblong and about 1.7mm in greatest length and about 1.5mm in diameter. Each capsule held from 20 to 50 eggs, the eggs at first quite clear, darkening to nearly black as incubation set in. The skin of the capsule is quite tough, flexible when touched with a sharp needle. A group of capsules set apart in a dish of sea water in- cubated in from 3 to 5 days, the hatched embryos devel- oping rapidly into nearly full-sized veligers which could be seen spinning around within the crowded space of the capsule for a day or more. In about the seventh day, the capsule would puncture at one end, the exit generally so small that only a single veliger could escape at a time, the others pushing on behind. From one capsule closely watched, the average time for the exit of a veliger was one minute and the entire capsule of 38 THE VELIGER Volchlss Nos! embryos to empty required a little over half an hour. In several other capsules, the last few veligers, unable to find the tiny exit, perished within. Once out, the veligers were extremely active for about two days, the cilia on their vela vibrating vigorously in a continuous wave- like pattern, producing the visual impression of rapidly rotating blades. Observed from above, the veligers looked like small helicopters with rapidly spinning rotor blades, or like a man on a bicycle, the shell hanging below. Oc- casionally the velar lobes would fold inward, and the embryo would sink to the bottom, sometimes to rest, or the embryo would begin to spin around actively as if to test, or to bore into, the substrate, for further meta- morphosis, then to rise again for another tour about. At first, the velar flaps were clear but as they grew a little larger 4 brown spots appeared. As noticed by Marcus (1959) for the veligers of Olivella verreauxii (Ducros, 1857), those of Oliva sayana RAvENEL, 1834 subsisted entirely on the yolk sacs within; these at first were dark and became gradually lighter in color. None of our veligers were able to undergo further metamorphosis, the substrate evidently being unfavorable. SUMMARY The egg capsules of Oliva sayana are free, hence subject to dispersal by currents; they differ from those of Oli- vella verreauxu, which are attached (Marcus, 1959). Whether this distinction is generic remains for future research to determine. Our observations show that many details of molluscan life may be obtained by patient snail watching of aquar- ium specimens. Species of Oliva lend themselves ad- mirably for this purpose through their ready adaptability to aquarium life, and they possess many interesting habits. LITERATURE CITED Marcus, ERNST 1959. Studies on Olividae. Zool. 22: 99 - 188 Bol. Fac. Filos. Cienc. S. Paulo, Explanation of Plate 2 Figure 1: Figure 2: Oliva scouting and sensing shrimp. Oliva going down with shrimp infolded in the foot. Figure 3: Oliva held in hand showing sole of foot, the propodium down and the food package infolded in the hinder section of the foot. Figure 4: Egg capsule, punctured and partly emptied. One veliger free outside, another part way out. ca. X 35. Figures 5, 6: operculum, etc. Free veligers. ca. X 160. Note small foot, shell, Tue VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 1 [OLtson « Crovo] Plate 2 Figure 2 Figure 4 Te Vol. 11; No. 1 THE VELIGER Page 33 A Record of the Indo-Pacific Cone, Conus ebraeus, in Guatemala BY WILLIAM K. EMERSON Department of Living Invertebrates American Museum of Natural History Seventy-ninth Street and Central Park West, Conus ebraeus LINNAEUS, 1758, A WIDE-RANGING, Shallow water, Indo-Pacific species, was first known to occur in the eastern Pacific at Clipperton Island and in the Gala- pagos Islands (Hertiein, 1937). In 1953, the late Ted Dranga found this species living on the mainland of the west coast of Central America. He reported (in litt.) taking a living specimen ... “‘in a crevice on an extensive area of hard rock wave bench covered with short sea weed >” on the Pacific coast of Guana- caste Province, Costa Rica (HERTLEIN & Emerson, 1953, p. 351). This record was subsequently cited by KEEN, 1958, p. 480; Hanna, 1963, p. 61; and Emerson, 1967, p. 89 (recorded erroneously as “Conus chaldeus R6- DING”). Housrick (1968) reported collecting two ad- ditional living specimens in the intertidal zone near Playas del Coco, Guanacaste Province, Costa Rica, in 1965. According to Dr. Kenneth J. Boss (in litt.), one of these specimens, cat. no. 256447, is deposited in the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University and it is a typical specimen of Conus ebraeus. The American Museum of Natural History recently received from Mrs. Jane Zager of West Orange, New Jersey, a specimen of Conus ebraeus that was stated to have been collected by G. Farris on flats exposed by a minus tide at San José, Escuintla Department, Guate- mala, in 1947. This specimen, cat. no. 114575, which measures 24.5mm in length, is nearly identical with one figured by HerTLEIN (1937, plt. 1, fig. 2) from Clipper- ton Island. These records indicate that this species may be expec- ted to occur in suitable habitats along the coast of the West Americas within the Panamic faunal province. Collectors should make a special effort to look for this New York, New York 10024 species and other Indo-Pacific faunal elements when col- lecting in the coastal waters of this region. At the present time most of the Indo-Pacific species occurring in the tropical eastern Pacific are known only from the oceanic islands, Clipperton, Revillagigedo, Cocos, and the Gala- pagos, off the west American coast (EMERSON, 1967). LITERATURE CITED Emerson, WILLIAM KEITH 1967. Indo-Pacific faunal elements in the tropical eastern Pacific, with special reference to the mollusks. Venus, Japan. Journ. Malac. 25 (3/4): 85-93; 1 map (July 1967) Hanna, G Datias 1963. | West American mollusks of the genus Conus; II. Calif. Acad. Sci. Occ. Pap. 35: 1-103; plts. 1-11 (28 January 1963) HERTLEIN, LEO GEORGE 1937. A note on some species of marine mollusks occurring in both Polynesia and the western Americas. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. 78 (2) : 303 - 312; 1 plt.; 1 map (December 1937) Hertvein, LEo Georce « WILLIAM K. EMERSON 1953. Mollusks from Clipperton Island (eastern Pacific) with the description of a new species of gastropod. Trans. San Diego Soc. Nat. Hist. 11 (13): 345 - 364; plts. 26, 27 (22 July 1953) Hovusrick, JosepH R. 1968. New record of Conus ebraeus in Costa Rica. Veliger 10 (3): 292. Keen, A. Myra 1958. Sea shells of tropical West America; marine mollusks from Lower California to Colombia. i-xi + 624 pp.; illus. Stanford, Calif. (Stanford Univ. Press) The (1 January 1968) Page 34 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 1 A Cowrie Mutant from the Gulf of Thailand BY FRANZ ALFRED SCHILDER University of Halle, German Democratic Republic (1 Text figure) MUTANTS ARE HEREDITARY VARIANTS which differ from typical specimens by one or a few striking characters; there are no, or only rare, intermediates. The mutants live among the not-varied individuals of the same species and do not show any environmental specialization. They show a distinct center of frequency and become gradually scarcer in populations living around this locality. True mutants differ from morphes (ScHILDER, 1966, p. 185) by their area of distribution being still very restricted, if compared with that of the typical species. In cowries such local mutants evidently are very rare, as only three variants can be classified in this way: Ovatipsa chinensis tortirostris (SowERBy, 1906) from South Africa (see ScHILDER, 1966, p. 186), Lyncina carneola titan ScuiL- DER & SCHILDER, 1962 from southern Kenya (established as a distinct species), and Erronea errones azurea SCHILDER, 1968, from Broome. Recently a fourth case has been disclosed by several series of cowries presented to me chiefly by Mr. J. Orr and Mr. Franz B. Steiner: Mauritia arabica LINNAEUS, 1758, which formerly was thought to be represented by a single race in the Gulf of Thailand (ScuiLprEr, 1965, p. 26), has proved to consist of two well separable variants along the east coast of the interior part of this Gulf. The primary Mauritia arabica is mostly small, oblong to ovate, and rather depressed; in shells from the northern Gulf of Thailand the length usually (i. e. in 67% of shells approaching the mean) varies from 43 to 55mm, the usual breadth from 60 to 62% of length, and the usual height from 48 to 51% of length. These shells belong to the subspecies Mauritia arabica asi- atica SCHILDER & ScHILDER, 1939 (ranging from Japan to the Gulf of Thailand) if this “race” really can be separated from the Malayan typical M. a. arabica by its lips being more acuminate chiefly at the rear. The mutant is larger and broader, as its usual length varies from 53 to 66mm and its breadth from 64 to 69% so that the means differ in a significant way; besides, the outline of the base is rather deltoidal (instead of ellip- tical) and the dorsum is humped, viz. relatively higher (usually 52 to 55% of length, the mean being 54 instead of 50%) and its top is displaced to the rear of the shell so that the shells recall Trona stercoraria (LinNaEus, 1758) in shape ( Figure 1). The brown dorsal longitudinal striae are evidently far less interrupted by pale lacunae than it is in the other races of Mauritia arabica. This mutant should be called Mauritia arabica gibba CoENn, 1949 (see ScuiLpER, 1964, p. 104) in spite of the inaccurate type locality “China Sea”: for this region also includes the Gulf of Thailand, and Corn’s indications of habitat were mostly uncertain or even false. The extremely broad and callous Mauritia arabica dilatata Coen, 1949 (see loc. cit.) becomes a synonym of M. a. gibba as it applies to an individual variant of which several speci- mens have been collected in the populations of the more frequent and less extreme M. a. gibba. The center of distribution of Mauritia arabica gibba evidently lies in the islands of the Ko Sichang group (about 70km SE of Bangkok), especially in Ko Taitamun (see map in Figure 1) ; here and in the Ko Khrok group (opposite of Pattaya) only has M. a. gibba been collected as yet, but no M. a. arabica. On the beaches of the mainland, however, from Pattaya to east of Rayong both M. a. arabica and M. a. gibba have been collected, e. g. in Ban Pe (Bang Pae) and in Ban Klaeng Lang, where the specimens of the species M. arabica include 75% and 68% respectively M. a. gibba. Farther east, i. e. at Laem Sing and in the Ko Chang group no M. a. gibba have been collected at all, as it is, according to Mr. J. Orr, the case also in the whole west coast of the Gulf of Thailand (Hua Hin, Chumporn, Songkla). Vol. 11; No. 1 Bankok ° Ko Sichang fe g Ko Khrok-* Ko Khram? | Gulf of Thailand THE VELIGER Page 35 Figure 1 Map of the northeastern Gulf of Thailand. — Right: Profile and basal view of Mauritia arabica (dotted line) and of its mutant gibba (solid line). The largest shells of Mauritia arabica gibba, varying from 67 to 79mm, have been collected in a Japanese wreck sunk in the Ko Sichang group during World War II: the dorsum of all specimens is rich chestnut showing the usual dark brown striae; this discoloration varying in intensity shell by shell evidently has been caused by the rusty water in which these animals lived; the base, however, is rather pale as usual. Therefore Mauritia arabica gibba is restricted to the east coast of the northernmost part of the Gulf of Thai- land from the Ko Sichang group to Ban Klaeng Lang. The center of the morphologically well separable mutant is in the Ko Sichang group in the innermost part of the Gulf of Thailand, from where it spread about 100km to the southeast. Note — The subspecific name gibba of Coen, 1949 is not preoccupied by Cypraea gibba GMELIN, 1791, because CoEN established the name for a members of the genus Mauritia. Lumpers, using the single generic name Cypraea for all cowries, will be obliged to establish a new name for the secondary homonym: for the only synonym of gibba, called Mauritia (Arabica) arabica dilatata by Corn, 1949 (see above) would become also a secondary homonym preoccupied by Cypraea spurca var. dilatata MonTEROSATO, 1897. LITERATURE CITED ScHILDER, FRANz ALFRED 1964. The cowries established by Cozn in 1949 (Mollusca: Gastropoda) . The Veliger 7 (2): 103-107 (1 Oct.’64) 1965. The cowrie fauna of Thailand. The Veliger 8 (1): 23-28; 1 map (1 July 1965) 1966. Personal views on taxonomy. The Veliger 8 (3): 181-189; 1 text fig. (1 January 1966) 1968. An interesting mutation in cowries. Hawaiian Shell News (in press) SCHILDER, FRANZ ALFRED, & MARIA SCHILDER 1938 - 1939. Prodrome of a monograph of living Cypraeidae. Proc. Malacol. Soc. London, 23 (3): 119-180; (1939) 23 (4) :-181 - 231; 1 text fig.; 9 maps. 1962. Zur Kenntnis der Cypraeidae: 5. Eine neue Riesenform aus Ostafrika. Arch. Molluskenk. 91 (4/6): 207 - 212; 1 fig. (30 December 1962) Page 36 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 1 The Rediscovery of Voluta (Lyria) grangert SOWERBY 3"°, 1900 CLIFTON STOKES WEAVER Hawaiian Malacological Society, 2777 Kalakaua Avenue, Honolulu, Hawaii 96815 AND JOHN ELEUTHERE puPONT Delaware Museum of Natural History, Greenville, Delaware 19807 (Plate 3; 1 Map) In JuLy oF 1967 we received from Mr. and Mrs. C. N. Cate of Los Angeles an unidentified shell that appeared to be a new volutid species in the genus Lyria Gray, 1847. It had been trawled by pearling luggers during August, 1949 in 5 fathoms of water a few miles north-northwest of Port Hedland, central Western Australia. The arrival of a second specimen from the Cates in October of the same year from the same locality seemed to confirm our opinion. However, further research showed that in 1900 Sowersy 3” described and figured Voluta (Lyria) gran- geri, in the Annals and Magazine of Natural History, ser. 7, vol. 5, p. 440, plt. 11, fig. 2, but he gave no locality data. His figure and description closely resembled the shells in question. When photographs of the holotype of Voluta (Lyria) grangeri arrived from the British Museum (Natural His- tory) in London and we compared them with the Cates’ specimens, there remained little doubt that all 3 shells were conspecific. Since 1900 Lyria grangeri seems to have been missing from molluscan literature. We therefore take pleasure in reestablishing grangeri as a valid specics in the genus Ly- ria and in designating a type locality for it. Lyriinae Pitspry «& Oxtsson, 1954 1954. Lyriinae Pitspry & Oxsson, Bull. American Paleont. 35 (152): 285, 286 Type Genus: Lyria Gray, 1847. Lyria Gray, 1847 1847, Lyria Gray, Proc. Zool. Soc. London 15: 141 Type Species: Voluta nucleus LAMarcK, 1811; Recent, Australia, by OD. (Lyria) s. s. Lyria (Lyria) grangeri (SowERBY 3", 1900) (Plate 3, Figures 1 to 6) 1900. Voluta (Lyria) grangeri SowErBy 3°, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (7) 5: 440, plt. 11, fig. 2 (no locality given). Type: Holotype, British Museum (Natural History), London, No. 1900.5.22.83. Type Locality: Here designated a few miles north- northwest of Port Hedland, central Western Austral- ia (see Map). Explanation of Plate 3 Ventral and Dorsal Aspects of Lyria (Lyria) grangeri (Sowrrsy 3", 1900) Figures 1, 2: Holotype, ex British Museum (Natural History), No. 1900.5.22.83; no locality data on original label; photo- graphs courtesy BM (NH). Figures 3, 4: Homeotype No. 1, cx C. N. Cate Coll.; trawled by a pearling lugger several miles NNW of Port Hedland, central Figures 5, 6: Western Australia in 5 fathoms; photographs by Clifton S. Weaver. Homeotype No. 2, ex C. N. Cate Coll.; same locality data as for the preceding specimen; photographs by Clifton S. Weaver. TuHeE VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 1 [WEAVER & DUPONT] Plate 3 7.) Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Vol. 11; No. 1 THE VELIGER INDIAN OCEAN DAMPIER ARCHIPELAGO BEZOUT at" Port Hedland ISLAND~.% / en NICHOL Det, BAY , e” Cossack LONG ISLAND A: Range limits of NORTH WEST CAPE / as presently known. PT. CLOATES a ee or CAPRICORN — — — ae 5 Carnarvon | SHARK * \ BAY A HOUTMAN ABROLHOS IS. ie Geraldton CAPE BOSSUT & of By : Lyria (Lyria) grangeri (Sowerby II, !900) | | Broome La Grange 20° 30° Page 38 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 1 Table 1 Measurements (in millimeters) and Collecting Data for Lyria (Lyria) grangenn (SowERBY 3*°, 1900) Maximum Collecting Height Diameter Aperture Depth in Growth Specimen Length Locality Fathoms Collection Stage Holotype 40.0 21.0 26.5 Unknown Unknown BM (NH) No. 1900.5.22.83 Adult Homeotype No. 1 41.3 24.0 27.2 A few miles NNW of Port 5 Cc. N. Cate Adult Hedland, central Western Australia Homeotype No. 2 42.8 24.6 30.0 A few miles NNW of Port 5 Cc. N. Cate Adult Hedland, central Western Australia BM (NH) = British Museum (Natural History) Range: Known only from type locality. Habitat: In 5 fathoms. Substrate unknown. Dimensions: See Table 1. Shell Description: Shell of medium size for genus, sub- globose, light in weight. Spire low, convex; apex blunt. Protoconch small, turbinate, of 2 smooth whorls. Teleo- conch of 5 swollen whorls indented at sutures. Sculpture consists of low narrow axial ribs extending from suture to suture, these ribs becoming broader and finally obso- lete on adult body whorl, about 19 or 20 such ribs on penultimate whorl of shell measuring 42.8 mm in length. Aperture wide, expanding anteriorly; interior a yellowish- cream color. Columella curved inward, with 3 anterior plaits, followed by numerous fine lirae which disappear about midpoint on columella. A small tooth-like projec- tion appears at posterior end of columella below junction of outer lip and body whorl. Outer lip thickened exter- nally to form a parallel raised ridge about 7mm wide. Siphonal notch wide, shallow; fasciole well defined. Base color creamy-white overlaid with chestnut-brown blot- ches forming 2 broad bands on body whorl, | at periphery and 1 above anterior tip. Fine brown lines, about 2mm apart, encircle body whorl and intrude just inside outer lip. Animal and Radula: Unknown. Remarks: We have removed Lyria grangeri from Voluta and placed it in the genus Lyria for obvious reasons. The species has much in common with Lyria (Lyria) deliciosa (Montrouzirr, 1859) including the small, smooth, tur- binate protoconch, axially ribbed early whorls, and the arrangement of columellar plaits and lirae. The single tooth-like projection on the posterior end of the columella also resembles that found in L. (L.) mitraeformis (La- MARCK, 1811) and on several other species of Lyria s. s. Although the distribution of Lyria (Lyria) mitrae- formis extends as far west as Albany, south Western Australia, no other Lyria, to our knowledge, inhabits waters off the central or north Western Australian coasts. We know of the existence of only 3 specimens of Lyria (Lyria) grangeri: The holotype is in the British Museum (Natural History), London, and 2 are in the collection of Mr. and Mrs. Crawford N. Cate; the pres- ent whereabouts of a possible fourth specimen, mentioned by Sowersy 3"? in his original description, is unknown. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We wish to thank our friends, Mr. and Mrs. C. N. Cate for allowing us to see the 2 specimens which triggered this investigation. We are also grateful to Dr. Norman Tebble and the photographic staff at the British Museum (Natural History), London, who kindly sent the type photographs which appear in this paper. LITERATURE CITED Gray, JoHN Epwarp 1847. A list of the genera of Recent Mollusca, their synonyma and types. Proc. Zool. Soc. London (for 1847) 17 [part 15] (178): 129 - 219 (November 1847) Lamarck, JEAN-BapTisTE PIERRE ANTOINE DE MONET DE 1811. De la détermination des espéces des mollusques testa- cés. Ann. Mus. Nat. d’Hist. Nat. 17: 62-69 (April 1811) Monrrouzigr, R. P. 1859. Descriptions d’espéces nouvelles de l’Archipel Calé- donien. Journ. de Conchyl. (2) 7: 375 (June 1859) Pirspry, HENry Aucustus « AxEL ADOLF OLSson 1954. Systems of the Volutidae. 35 (152): 271 - 306; plts. 25 - 28 SowERBY, GEORGE BRETTINGHAM (3rd of name) Bull. American Paleont. (7 September 1954) 1900. New species of mollusca of the genera Voluta, Conus, Siphonalia, and Euthria. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (7) 5: 440; plt. 11, fig. 2 (May 1900) Vol. 11; No. 1 THE VELIGER Page 39 A List of Types of the Family Volutidae Held by the National Museum of Victoria BRIAN J. SMITH Curator of Invertebrates National Museum of Victoria, Australia BoTH PRIMARY AND SECONDARY TYPES of the family Volutidae held by the National Museum of Victoria are listed under the original name. The present status in each case is included according to the Second Provisional Spe- cies List of Living Volutidae, by C.S. WEAVER (1964). Cymbiola randalli Stoxes, 1961. Holotype. Reference: Stokes, A. J., 1961. A new species of Volute from Undine Reef, Queensland Cymbiola randalli sp. nov. R. Soc. S. Aust. Malac. Sec. Publ. 16: 3, fig. Type Locality: 3 miles from Undine Reef, North Queens- land on sandy bottom. Collected by Mr. A. J. Randall. Present Status: Synonym of Cymbiolacca wisemani (Brazier, 1870) National Museum of Victoria Reg. No. F 22758 Remarks: Shell only. Livonia mamilla leucostoma Maysiom, 1951. Holotype. Reference: Maysiom, A. 1951. Deep-sea shells from New South Wales. Aust. Zool., 11 (4): 283; plt. 26, fig. 3. Type Locality: Below 80 fms. around Gabo Island. Present Status: Synonym of Livonia mamilla (SowERBY, 1844). National Museum of Victoria Reg. No. F 19280 Remarks: Shell only. Voluta hamillei Crosse, 1869. Holotype. Reference: Crossr, H., 1869. Diagnose d’une espéce nouvelle de Voluta. Journ. de Conch., Paris. 17: 278. Crosse, H., 1870. Description d’espéces nouvelles. Journ. de Conch., Paris. 18: 97 - 99; plt. 1, fig. 5 and plt. 2, fig. 4. Type Locality: Japan. In the original description (1869) the type locality was quoted as Solomon Islands. This was corrected to Japan in the next year. Present Status: Fulgoraria hamillei (Crossr, 1869). Valid Species. National Museum of Victoria Reg. No. F 26773. Remarks: Shell only. Specimen purchased from Mr. R. Damon in 1875 for 15 pounds. Voluta roadnightae McCoy, 1881. Holotype. Reference: McCoy, F, 1881. Description of new Volute from South Coast of Australia. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. Fifth. Ser. 8: 88 - 89; plt. 7, figs. 1 and 2. Type Locality: Southern Coast of Victoria. Type speci- men found on the beach, Lake’s Entrance, Gippsland, Victoria. Collected by Mrs. Roadnight. Present Status: Livonia roadnightae (McCoy, 1881). Valid species. National Museum of Victoria Reg. No. F 662 Remarks: Shell only. The type specimen was first noticed by the eminent botanist, Baron von Mueller when on a visit to the Gippsland Lakes district where it was serving as a prop to keep his bedroom window open at his hotel. Voluta (Amoria) spenceriana GatuFF, 1908 Holotype. Reference: Gaturr, J. H., 1908. Description of Voluta (Amoria) spenceriana, sp. nov. from North Queensland. Victorian Nat. 25 (5), fig. Type Locality: North Queensland. Collected by J. F Bailey. Present Status: Amoria spenceriana (GaTurFF, 1908). Valid species. National Museum of Victoria Reg. No. F 455 Remarks: Shell only. Voluta thatcheri McCoy, 1868. Holotype. Reference: McCoy, F, 1868. On a new Volute. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. Fourth Ser., 1: 54; plt. 2, fig. 1. Page 40 Type Locality: From the type description habitat un- known. Dr. Cox (1872) states that the type specimen was purchased by Mr. C. R. Thatcher in a pawnbroker’s shop in Collins Street, Melbourne. Specimens have since been taken alive from Bampton Reefs, north of New Caledonia. Present Status: Notovoluta thatcheri (McCoy, 1868). Valid species. National Museum of Victoria Reg. No. F 22764 Remarks: Shell only. Aulica kellneri TREDALE, 1957. Paratypes Reference: IREDALE, T., 1957. Another Australian Volute. Journ. Proc. R. Zool. Soc. N. S.W. 1955-1956 [1957]: 91 to 92; plt. Type Locality: Eastern Arnhem Land, North Australia. Locality on paratypes — Blythe River Gulf, Northern Territory. Present Status: Synonym of Aulica flavicans (GMELIN, 1791). National Museum of Victoria Reg. No. F 18192 Remarks: 2 shells. Cymbiolacca cracenta McMicwae1, 1963. Paratype Reference: McMicuaet, D.F, 1963. Descriptions of two new species of the genus Cymbiolacca IREDALE (Gas- tropoda: Volutidae). Journ. malac. Soc. Austral. 7: 33 - 41 Type Locality: Dredged in 17 - 20 fathoms 15 miles SE of Cape Green (south of Townsville), Queensland. Col- lector probably T. Nielsen. Present Status: Cymbiolacca cracenta McMicuatk1, 1963. Valid species. National Museum of Victoria Reg. No. F 23822 Remarks: One shell. Cymbiolacca complexa nielsent McMicHak1, 1959. Paratype Reference: McMicuac1, D. FE, 1959. Marine Mollusca of Eastern Australia. 1. The genus C'ymbiolacca IREDALE (Family Volutidae). Aust. Zool. 12 (4): 374 - 383; plt. 44, Type Locality: 30 miles off Burnett Heads, Hervey Bay, Queensland, 10 fathoms (locality of the N. M. V. paratype given as off Bundaberg, Queensland). Present Status: Cymbiolacca complexa nielsent McMt- CHAEL, 1959. Valid subspecies. National Museum of Victoria Reg. No. F 18259 Remarks: Specimen (shell and animal) in spirit; also a radula slide from the same specimen with the same Reg. No. This is the only type radula slide of this subspecies. THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 1 Cymbiolacca peristicta McMicHae1, 1963. Paratypes Reference: McMicwaet, D.F, 1963. Descriptions of two new species of the genus Cymbiolacca IREDALE (Gas- tropoda: Volutidae). Journ. malac. Soc. Aust. 7: 33 - 41; plt. 6. Type Locality: Big Sandy Cay, Swain Reefs; dredged 2 fathoms. Collector Mr. T: Nielsen. Present Status: Cymbiolacca peristicta’ McMicHAEL, 1963. Valid species. National Museum of Victoria Reg. No. F 22757 Remarks: Two shells. Nannamoria parabola Garrarb, 1960. Paratype Reference: Garrarp, T: A., 1960. A new species of Nann- amoria (Mollusca: Volutidae) from Southern Queens- land. Journ. malac. Soc. Aust. 4: 2 - 13; plt. 1. Type Locality: 125 fathoms off Moreton Island, Queens- land. Present Status: Nannamoria parabola GarRARD, 1960. Valid species. National Museum of Victoria Reg. No. F 21107 Remarks: One shell. Pseudocymbiola provocationis McMicwHaet, 1961 Paratype Reference: McMicuaet, D. F, 1961. New Species and new records of marine Mollusca from Australia. Journ. malac. Soc. Aust. 5: 51-57; pit. 4, figs. 9 - 10. Type Locality: Off Port Kembla, N.S. W. Present Status: Pseudocymbiola provocationis McMicu- AEL, 1961. Valid species . National Museum of Victoria Reg. No. F 23821 Remarks: Shell only. Voluta (Amoria) gatliffi SowErBy, 1910. Cotypes Reference: Sowersy, G. B., 1910. Description of a new Volute. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. Ser. 8, 6: 611. Type Locality: Port Keats, Northern Territory, Australia. Present Status: Synonym of Amoria damoni (Gray, 1864). National Museum of Victoria Reg. No. F 620 & F 5066 Remarks: Shells only. — There may possibly be a third cotype, Reg. No. F 626, but this cannot be found. Voluta macgillivrayi Cox, 1873. Paratype Reference: Cox, J.C., 1873. Distribution of Australian Volutes. Second edition. Vol. 11; No. 1 Type Locality: Woodlark Island. New Guinea. Present Status: Synonym of Aulicina norrisii (GRAY, 1838). National Museum of Victoria Reg. No. F 5067 Remarks: Shell only. Voluta mamilla Gray, 1844 Figured Specimen Reference: Gaturr, J.H. « C.J. Gasrier, 1909, First record of the animal of Voluta mamilla, Gray; with re- marks thereon. Victorian Nat. 26 (8): 117-118; plts. 2 & 3, figs. 1-5. Type Locality: 15 miles SW of Gabo Island, Victoria, in THE VELIGER Page 41 30 fathoms. Present Status: Livonia mamilla (Gray, 1844). Valid species. National Museum of Victoria Reg. No. F 805 Remarks: Radula slide cannot be found. Shell only. Shell and animal of this species all figured. Also in the collections of the National Museum of Victoria are photographs of a paratype of Mesericusa stokesi Cotton, 1961. Reference: Cotton, B. C., 1961. A new species of Volute, Mesericusa stokesi sp. nov. from South Australia. R. Soc. S. Aust. Malac. Sec. Publ. 16: 1; fig. Page 42 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 1 Mediargo, a New Tertiary Genus in the Family Cymatiidae BY JUDITH S. TERRY Department of Geology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94306 (Plate 4) INTRODUCTION In THE COURSE OF RESEARCH on Recent and fossil species of the cymatiid genera Argobuccinum, Fusitriton, and Priene, the writer observed (TERRY, 1968) a number of Pliocene specimens that possess characters of all three genera but could not be assigned to any one. Juveniles resemble Recent species of Gyrineum Linx, 1807, and late juveniles are easily confused with those of Fusttriton oregonensis (REDFIELD, 1848). Young adults are similar to Recent species of Argobuccinum HERRMANNSEN, 1846, while gerontic forms such as the holotype of Gyrineum lewisti Carson, 1926 and the mature specimen figured herein are distinct from all other cymatiids. Specimens of different growth stages have been compared, and 2 species can be recognized: Mediargo mediocris (Dax, 1909) of middle or late Miocene to Pliocene age, and M. mathew- sonii (Gass, 1866), which ranges from the middle Oligo- cene to middle Miocene. Only the former, the type species, will be considered here. Mediargo TERRY, gen. nov. Type Species: Gyrineum mediocre DAL, 1909 Specimens referred to Mediargo by the writer have been classified most commonly in Ranella, Bursa and Gyrineum. Although characters, such as lateral varices and anterior pillar folds, are common to all four, the new genus is distinguished by a combination of these and other morphologic features that place it closer to Argobuccinum and Fusitriton. Diagnostic generic characters that are seen in all but the largest gerontic specimens include the following: two nearly continuous lateral varices on each volution, high spire, rounded whorls having tabulate shoulders, mod- erate to long anterior canal, anal notch oriented at an angle to the axis of coiling (as in Fusitriton, in contrast to the apically directed notch in Argobuccinum), trans- verse pillar folds over most of the columella, and a denti- culate or plicate outer lip. Axial and spiral costae may be marked or obsolete and are commonly present on juvenile whorls but conspicuously lacking in the later stages. Mediargo differs from Argobuccinum in its tabular whorls and anal notch, from Fusitriton in its lateral varices and plicate aperture, and from Gyrineum in its outline, tabulate shoulders, ovate aperture, marked anal notch, and large size. The name Mediargo is feminine in gender. It combines the root of Gyrineum mediocre, here designated as the type species, and the prefix of Argobuccinum, the genus to which it is morphologically most similar. Explanation of Plate 4 Figure 1: Mediargo mediocris (Dat, 1909). Holotype U.S.N. M. No. 153900, Coos Bay, Oregon. Pliocene. Holotype of Gyrine- um mediocre Dati, 1909. 4.4cm high. Figure 2: Mediargo mediocris (Datt), LACMIP No. 2155.96, Palos Verdes Hills, California. “Pleistocene.” [reworked Pliocene.] 4.2cm high. Figure 3: Mediargo mediocris (DaLL), Univ. Oregon F 2638, Bandon, Oregon. Mio-Pliocene. 4.2cm high. Compare variation in sculpture between specimens in Figures 2 and 3. Figure 4: Mediargo mediocris (Dat), CAS No. 11689, from a well in San Diego, California. Pliocene. 4.5 cm high. Figure 5: Mediargo mediocris (DatL), Paratype, USNM No. 645876, Coos Bay, Oregon. Miocene or Pliocene. (Former number was 153900.) 6cm high. Figure 6: Mediargo mediocris (Datt), LSJU No. 138, Santa Maria District, California. Pliocene. [Paratype of Gyrineum lewisti GARSON, 1926.] 6.2 cm high. Figure 7: Mediargo mediocris (DatL), UCMP No. 10105, Coos County, Oregon. Pliocene. Note plicate aperture. 4.6cm high. Figures 8, 9: Mediargo mediocris (Dat), LSJU No. 31625, Kettleman Hills, Fresno County, California. Pliocene. Mature spe- cimen. 11.3 cm high. Tue VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 1 [Terry] Plate 4 Figure 3 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 9 Vol. 11; No. 1 THE VELIGER Page 43 Mediargo mediocris (Dati, 1909) (Plate 4, Figures 1 to 9) Gyrineum mediocre Dati, 1909, U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pa- per 59: 54-55; plt. 7, fig. 6 Weaver, 1943, Univ. Wash. Publ. Geol. 5 (II) : 423 - 424; (III): plt. 83, fig. 13 Gyrineum lewisii Carson, 1926, Bull. So. Calif: Acad. Sci. 25: 53 - 54; plt. 2, figs. 1, 2 Ranella (Priene) mediocris (DaLL): Grant & Gate, 1931, Mem. San Diego Soc. Nat. Hist. 1: 736 Ranella (Priene) lewisti (CARSON): Grant & Gate, 1931, Mem. San Diego Soc. Nat. Hist. 1: 736 “Gyrineum” mediocre lewisiti CARSON: Wooprinc & BraM- LETTE, 1950, U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof: Paper 222: 73 - 74; pit. 12, figs. 13, 15; plt. 13, figs. 23, 24, 26, 27 Type Information: The holotype, USNM 1539000, and paratype, USNM 645876, were collected by Mr. B.H. Camman from the vicinity of Fossil Point, Coos Bay, Oregon (Lat. 43°23’ N, Long. 124°12’ W). They are in the type collection of the Division of Invertebrate Pale- ontology at the Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C. Both are worn, incomplete, half grown forms, the holotype measuring 44mm, the paratype 60mm in height. Dati (1909) considered them Miocene in age but later workers refer them to the Pliocene. The holo- type is certainly Pliocene and the paratype may be either Pliocene or reworked from Miocene beds near Fossil Point. Descriptive Notes: Mature adult specimens have at least 8 whorls and may be 136mm or more in height. Two conspicuous, discontinuous lateral varices occur on each whorl, the alignment being more perfect in juvenile forms. Shoulders are tabulate and whorls rounded and inflated. Shells are high spired, a character that is not evident in adults with broken apices. Differences in sculpture are seen in progressive growth stages, which also show considerable intraspecific variability. Numerous axial ribs bearing nodes at the junctions with bifurcated spiral costae are generally present on juvenile whorls but obscure to totally absent in adults. Most Pliocene adult specimens are characterized by sharply incised spiral grooves. Although pronounced in material from tar seeps in the Santa Maria District, California, incised spirals are not produced by a particular mode of preservation. The aperture is ovate and modified by a marked anal notch near the posterior parietal callous deposit. The slightly flexed pillar and outer lip bear plications that are present in juveniles and half grown adults, but lacking in large gerontic forms in which the outer lip is flared. Juveniles of Mediargo mediocris have been confused with those of Fusitriton oregonensis, although spiral sculpture differs slightly and E oregonensis lacks pillar furrows and regularly spaced varices. The division be- tween Mediargo mediocris (Datt) and M. mathewsonii (Gasp) is drawn between strongly grooved Pliocene and late Miocene specimens of the former and older, more coarsely sculptured forms of the latter, none of which attains the large size of M. mediocris adults. Distribution in Time and Space: Range: middle (?) or late Miocene to late Pliocene, from the Olympic Peninsula, Washington to San Diego, California. Stratigraphic units from which the species has been collected include the Quillayute Formation (Pliocene) of Washington, Astoria Formation (Miocene) and Em- pire Formation (Pliocene) of Oregon, and the Falor, Wildcat, Merced, Etchegoin, Fernando and Niguel For- mations (all Pliocene) of California. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Specimens in addition to those in the collections at Stanford University were made available by Drs. Thomas Waller and Druid Wilson of the U.S. National Museum, Dr. Leo G. Hertlein of the California Academy of Sciences, Mr. Joseph Peck of the University of California at Berkeley, Mr. George Kanakoff, Mr. Edward Wilson, and Mr. Louie Marincovich of the Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History, Dr. Warren Addicott and Mr. J. G. Vedder of the U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, and Mrs. Carole Hickman, Department of Geology, University of Oregon. Their kind generosity in providing loans and locality information is gratefully acknowledged. The manuscript was read by Dr. A. Myra Keen, whose suggestions and criticisms are most appreciated. LITERATURE CITED Carson, C. M. 1926. New molluscan species from the California Pliocene. So. Calif. Acad. Sci. Bull. 25: 49 - 62; plts. 1-4 Dati, WILLIAM HEALEY 1909. Contributions to the Tertiary paleontology of the Pa- cific coast. I. The Miocene of Astoria and Coos Bay, Oregon. U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper 59: 1 - 278; plts. 1 - 23 Gass, Witt1am More 1866. Paleontology of California, v. II, Cretaceous and 299 pp; 36 plts. (1869) Grant, Utysses S., IV. « Hoyr Ropney GALE Tertiary fossils. 1931. Catalogue of the marine Pliocene and Pleistocene Mollusca of California and adjacent regions. Mem. San Diego Soc. Nat. Hist. 1: 1- 1036; 15 text figs.; plts. 1 - 32 (3 November 1931) Page 44 THE VELIGER Terry, JupiTH S. 1968. Taxonomy and distribution in space and time of the marine gastropod genera Argobuccinum, Fusitriton, and Priene (Family Cymatiidae). Unpubl. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, 203 pp.; 11 plts. WEaveR, C. E. 1943. Paleontology of the marine Tertiary formations of Oregon and Washington. Univ. Washington Publ. Geol. 5 (2): Mollusca, pp. 275 - 562; (3): plts.; faunal tables, bibl., faunal localities, index, pp. 563 - 790; 104 plts. Wooprinc, WENDELL PHILLIPS & Mitton NuNN BRAMLETTE 1950. Geology and paleontology of the Santa Maria District, California. U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper 222: 1 - 185; plts. 1-23 Vol. 11; No. 1 Vol. 11; No. 1 THE VELIGER Page 45 The Role of Behavioral Traits in Influencing the Distribution of Two Species of Sea Mussel, Mytilus edulis and Mytilus californianus J. R. E. HARGER Department of Biological Sciences University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California ' (3 Text figures) INTRODUCTION IN THE COURSE of an investigation into the nature of competitive interactions between two species of sea mus- sels (Mytilus edulis Linnatus, 1758 and M. californi- anus Conrap, 1837) on the coast of Southern Califor- nia, I discovered that in addition to certain morphol- logical characters which served to differentiate the two species, a difference in behavior was also apparent. Know- ledge of this behavior enabled me to account for a difference in the distribution of the two species in large mussel clumps occurring intertidally on pier pilings. The pier concerned (property of Signal Oil & Gas Company) is located at Ellwood, some 14 miles west of the city of Santa Barbara, California, on an open sandy shore. It is constructed from steel girders and is about half a mile long; the pilings support clumps of mussels in the inter- tidal region, which range in size from a few individuals up to giant masses some 17 feet (5.2m) in circumference with a vertical extent of around 9 feet (2.7m). A. FIELD INVESTIGATION METHODS I investigated the distribution of the two species of mussels within the mussel clumps in the following man- ner. Before removing samples of mussels from the clumps on the pilings, I sprayed the outside animals thoroughly with white enamel paint. This provided an objective 1 Present address: Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B. C., Canada 70 60 60 50 50 40 40 30 30 a 20 20 5 10 10 go Co) = Oo = ° 210 oO 13 20 20 ° ° 0 Co) j Size (cm) “Y Figure 1 Size distribution of Mytilus edulis and Mytilus californianus from the inside and outside of a mussel clump at Ellwood Pier. The total sample represents approximately one third (by volume) of a clump measuring 7 feet (2.13m) in cricumference. Diagram 1: Mytilus edulis from outside the clump. Sample size is 262, mean is 4.6cm Diagram 2: Mytilus edulis from inside the clump. Sample size is 72, mean is 3.5cm Diagram 3: Mytilus californianus from inside the clump. Sample size is 175, mean is 3.10cm Diagram 4: Mytilus californianus from outside the clump. Sample size is 53, mean is 7.82 cm The class interval for each histogram is 1.0cm. Page 46 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 1 Table 1 Numbers of Mytilus edulis and Mytilus californianus from the inside and outside portions of a sample taken from a mussel clump containing both species. The sample represents approximately one third (by volume) of a clump measuring 7 feet (2.13m) in circumference. Outside Inside Mytilus californianus Mytilus edulis Mytilus californianus Mytilus edulis Top 68 117 317 72 Middle 168 555 687 302 Bottom 73 262 343 114 method for determining whether a particular mussel came from inside or outside a cluster. Mussels completely or partly covered with paint were recorded as “outside” mussels and the rest as “inside” mussels (hereafter the term “inside” mussels refers to animals selected in this manner). The mussels were detached by taking a straight hoe and slicing the inside individuals away from a piling face, from the top to the bottom of the aggregation. In this way, a sample of 4 to 4 of the complete clump was removed at one time. I then divided the slab of mussels into 3 equal portions: top, middle, and bottom. Individ- ual mussels of each species then were classified into 6 categories. Cs ee iType Mytilus californianus or Mytilus edulis Position Outside or Inside Depth Top, Middle or Bottom RESULTS or FIELD INVESTIGATION Table 1 records the number and positions of mussels within 4 of a clump measuring 7 feet (2.1m) in circum- ference. In mixed aggregations most of the Mytilus edulis occur on the outside of the clumps. Mytilus edulis juveniles (up to 2.5cm) tend to be found on the outside of the clumps while M. californianus juveniles tend to occur within the body of the clump. Figure 1 illustrates this distribution. B. LABORATORY INVESTIGATION METHODS ann RESULTS For the sake of convenience I will include experiments carried out in the field under the above heading (ex- periments of this nature were carried out at Ellwood Pier and in the Santa Barbara Harbor). In the course of studying competition among juvenile mussels (1 -2cm in length), I assembled cages contain- ing Mytilus edulis mixed evenly with M. californianus (100 individuals of each species). These cages were sus- pended beneath Ellwood Pier below low water level. At the first inspection of this experiment (after an immersion interval of 1 month) evidence implying a difference in behavior between the two species was re- vealed. Most of the Mytilus edulis in the cages had moved to the outside of the enclosed clumps, leaving the M. californianus in the center. Such a difference in behavior would plainly be of advantage for M. edulis in a competitive situation since it would seem reasonable to assume that mussels on the outside of a clump would be the first to capture food particles from the surrounding water and, in addition, would not be pressed upon, and therefore interfered with, by their neighbors. This im- plied difference in behavior suggested a mechanism which would account for the disparate clump distribu- tion shown by the two mussel species. It seemed reason- able to suppose that any M. edulis individuals settling within the matrix of a cluster would move to the outside, attach firmly, and then grow to maturity. To test the possibility of such a difference in behavior between the two species I took small individuals (1 - 2 cm) of both species into the laboratory, placed them (sepa- rately) about 5cm below the surface of road gravel (0.5 to 0.7/5 cm diameter) within perforated plastic containers and immersed these containers in running sea water. Figure 2 records the cumulative numbers of mussels ap- pearing on the surface of the gravel with the passing of time. Mytilus edulis obviously crawls out from the gravel at amuch higher rate of speed than does M. californianus. When individuals of Mytilus edulis were placed 5cm below the surface of a gravel filled plastic tube (1.5 inches [3.81cm] in diameter) which was sealed at one end, they always crawled through the gravel, towards and out of the open end of the tube, regardless of whether Vol. 11; No. 1 THE VELIGER Page 47 = ° ° ~I o oa fo} N on °o ° re) RSS EN [e2) sr » ve) n = .) (o) 148 Number of Mussels Appearing on Surface Time (hours) Figure 2 Comparison between the rate of “crawling out” by Mytilus edulis and Mytilus californianus when both species are initially buried under 5cm of road gravel. Two replicate runs for each species are recorded. Solid symbols represent Mytilus californianus, open symbols represent Mytilus edulis, The total number of animals used for each trial was 100. the opening faced directly upwards, horizontally or at any intermediary angle. If small mussels (1 -2cm) are buried in gravel at a depth greater than 13cm, very few of them are able to crawl to the surface, presumably because the weight of the stones is too great for them to move against. This probably helps to explain why the mussels crawled to- wards the open end of the tube rather than the closed end. Initially I had thought that small Mytilus edulis might settle within the matrix of the clump of mussels and then crawl to the outside using light as a possible orientation cue. To test this hypothesis I placed 3 cages containing small mussels at a depth of 5cm below the gravel sur- face, inside light-tight boxes through which ran sea water The first cage was illuminated from the top by a direc- tional light beam, the second was illuminated from the side and the third was kept completely dark. All mussels crawled to the top of the cages and no difference in “crawl-out” rate could be detected among the 3 treat- ments. This indicated that it was not a positive reaction to light which caused Mytilus edulis to orient themselves on the outside of the mussel clumps. This “crawling-out” reaction, then, seems to be evoked in response to some tactile sensation induced by the pres- sure of objects resting against the mussels. This hypo- thesis is supported by the fact that when small Mytilus edulis are placed separately within the interstices of a cairn of “fist-sized” stones in such a manner that they press neither against themselves nor against the stones, they do not crawl out (except for an occasional individ- ual), but remain fixed in one place. The only other mussel to occur in large numbers on the coast of Southern California is Septifer bifurcatus (Con- RAD, 1837), a rather small animal (maximum size 3.5 to 4.5cm), found only on exposed shores. The crawling be- havior of Septifer is quite different from that of Mytilus edulis or M. californianus. When Septifer is placed a few centimeters below a gravel surface it dos not move from its position. When placed on top of a bed of gravel or on a pitted surface, Septifer reacts by drawing itself down into any depression which it may encounter. Septifer is generally found in the mid-intertidal area where it nestles in nooks and crannies. Where all 3 species of mussels occur together, Septifer is to be found right next to the rock face. Mytilus californianus is next, on top of Septifer, and finally, M. edulis occurs on the outside of such a “three species” clump. If one considers the two extremes of exposure to wave impact to which Mytilus edulis and M. californianus are separately adapted, the behavioral differences can be correlated with a presumed advantage for each species. In quiet waters, where M. edulis predominates, mussel clumps tend to become saturated with fine mud which settles out from the still water. Table 2 records the mean dry weight of silt taken at bi-monthly intervals from cages immersed in Santa Barbara Harbor (heavy silting), and Ellwood Pier (less silt). Plainly it would be advan- tageous for any individual to be able to crawl above this mud and so avoid being buried. Table 2 Comparison of the dry weight of silt taken from cages of mussels sct at Santa Barbara Harbor and at Ellwood Pier (below low water), at bi-monthly intervals. N Ye S N Y ) 1 4 72.13 + 43.38 4 6.13 +3.18 2 2 34.80 + 22.0 2 6.88 +6.03 3 2 113.40 + 55.80 2 8.40 +1.20 4 4 54.45 ar 114) 8) 3 3.51 2°13 5 2 89.75 = 4.5 2 7.04 +£5.98 N = sample size Y = mean S = standard deviation [In this connection it may be noted that when small mussels of both species are grown together within cages suspended in the Santa Barbara Harbor, Mytilus edulis crawls to the outside of the clumps, leaving M. californianus on the inside to be eventually smothered by the accumulating silt.] On the exposed coast where Mytilus californianus pre- dominates, it would perhaps be advantageous to this animal to attach itself quite firmly to the substratum Page 48 TEM EIGER Vol. 11; No. 1 since any individual crawling to the outside of a clump would presumably run the danger of being washed off. In fact, pure Af. californianus clumps tend to be very tightly bound up with byssal threads and it is almost impossible to tear chunks of such clumps loose with one’s bare hands. In contrast to this, when M. edulis forms pure species clusters (i. e., on pilings within har- bors), it is possible to tear these clumps apart with little effort. It is as if individuals of M. edulis sabotage the structure of the clumps of which they are a part by con- tinually attempting to crawl out on top of each other. An alternative reason for the marked crawling behav- ior of Mytilus edulis might be that this is a “behavioral character displacement” which has been evolved through competition with M. californianus (i.e., individuals of M. edulis which become trapped within a clump are soon crushed and only those on the outside of a clump may survive). To throw some light on the latter hypothesis, I took some Mytilus edulis from the East Coast of the U.S.A. (Cape Ann, Massachusetts) where M. californianus does not occur, and compared their “crawl-out” behavior with 25 ~ x) ° nn ° Number of Mussels Appearing on Surface o QO 6 1 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72 ‘Time (hours) Figure 3 Comparison between the rate of “crawling out” shown by Mytilus edulis from the West Coast of North America (Santa Barbara, California) and Mytilus edulis from the East Coast of North America (Cape Ann, Massachusetts), when both samples are initially buried under 5cm of road gravel. Three replicate runs for each sample are recorded, solid symbols representing West Coast Mytilus edulis, open symbols representing East Coast Mytilus edulis, with total number of animals used for each trial 25 and the water temperature at 18° C. that of the West Coast (Santa Barbara) M. edulis. The East Coast mussels crawled out from the gravel at a much faster rate than the West Coast mussels (Figure 3). This experiment was repeated in water at temperatures of 12°C and 18°C (the latter was the temperature of Santa Barbara ocean water) with similar results. Since M. edulis occurs by itself on the East Coast, it would seem that this behavior might have developed as an adap- tation to the physical environment rather than as a response to interspecies competition. If this were so, one could then view “crawling out” behavior as a preadap- tation for competitive interaction with M. californianus. DISCUSSION Crawling behavior of Mytilus edulis has been noted by European workers, i. e., Fietp (1922) and Maas GEEs- TERANUS (1942). FieLp (op. cit.) described the course of several small mussels as they worked their way up an aquarium wall. Movement takes place in the following manner: the mussel extends its foot and at the same time produces a byssal thread which it then fastens by means of the foot-groove and associated glands at the tip of the foot, then releasing its old thread(s) and pulling itself onto the new one. The process is then repeated until journeying is done. This characteristic behavioral trait of M, edulis is in itself rather insignificant but it is enough to give the animal a considerable advantage when competing with M. californianus (HarceEr, 1967). Of course, the position on the outside of a mussel clump is not entirely without danger, as the likelihood of being swept away by waves or taken by some predator is greatly increased (HarRGER, op. cit., LANDENBERGER, 1967). It is possible that it is this “crawling out” behavior which has enabled Mytilus edulis to become so wide- spread throughout the world (see Stussrnes, 1954, for an account of the distribution). Certainly M. edulis is spread widely throughout the Northern and Southern hemispheres and, further, it is known to successfully col- onize both rocky shores and muddy bottomed bays (Lewis, 1953). It would indeed be interesting to know whether any other species of mussel is as adept at this crawling be- havior as Mytilus edulis. SUMMARY I have shown that a difference in behavior exists between Mytilus edulis and M. californianus in that the former Vol. 11; No. 1 THE VELIGER Page 49 species tends to crawl more rapidly out from under objects which press against it, than the latter. A third mussel, Septifer bifurcatus, does not show this behavior but rather tends to pull itself down against the substratum. The crawling behavior ensures that Mytilus edulis be- comes arranged on the outside of mixed species (M. cali- fornianus and M. edulis) mussel clumps and so enjoys an initial competitive advantage over M. californianus. This behavior also insures that M. edulis can keep above the surface of mud when it colonizes soft muddy areas (bays, etc.). ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work forms part of a Ph. D. dissertation submitted at the University of California at Santa Barbara. I wish to thank Dr. J.H.Connell for collections of Mytilus edulis made at Cape Ann, Massachusetts, for guidance and for criticism and above all for allowing me to develop ideas under his guidance. I wish also to thank Dr. D. E. Landenberger and Mr. J. Stimson for constant and helpful criticism, and Dr. E. W. Fager for his contribution in the form of a pointed question which led to my dis- covering that mussels could crawl sideways as well as upwards. iw SAN secu CT tS Finally I would like to thank the Signal Oil and Gas Company for making their pier at Ellwood, California, available for ecological research. LITERATURE CITED Fie.p, Irvine A. 1922. Biology and economic value of the sea mussel (Mytilus edulis). Bull. U.S. Bur. Fish. 38: 127 - 259 Harcer, JouN R. E. 1967. Population studies on Mytilus communities. Ph. D. dissertation, Univ. Calif. at Santa Barbara LANDENBERGER, DONALD E. 1967. Studies on predation and predatory behavior in Paci- fic starfish (Pisaster). Ph. D. dissertation, Univ. Calif. at Santa Barbara Lewis, J. R. 1953. The ecology of rocky shores around Anglesey. Proc. Zool. Soc. London 123: 481 - 549 Maas GEESTERANUS, R.A. 1942. On the formation of banks by Mytilus edulis (L.). Arch. Neerl. Zool. 6: 283 - 326 Stussincs, H. G. 1954. Biology of the common mussel in relation to fouling problems. Research, London 7: 222 - 229 Page 50 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 1 Notes on the Food of Conus dalli Stearns, 1873 JAMES W. NYBAKKEN Moss Landing Marine Laboratories, Box 223, Moss Landing, California 95039 Conus dalli STEARNS, 1873 HAS LONG BEEN considered to be the West American representative of the C. textile group and indeed its color pattern is such that it is difficult to distinguish from its Indo-Pacific congener (Hanna, 1963). Koun (1959) has reported that Conus textile Lin- NAEUS, 1758 is a mollusk eater, and it is therefore of interest to know whether or not C. dalli shares this die- tary preference. To my knowledge the food of this species has not been reported in the literature, a gap which may be due in part to the fact that it is not commonly collected alive. This note reports on observations of C. dalli feeding on mollusks. On November 13, 1967, while I was participating in Stanford University’s Te Vega Expedition 16 ', four living specimens of Conus dalli were collected at Cape San Lucas, Baja California, Mexico, by members of the ex- pedition. These four specimens were all collected in a small area of loose rock on a sand substrate. The depth varied from 5 to 8 feet. All four specimens were found buried in sand under rocks. Specimens of C. diadema Sowerby, 1834, C. tiaratus BropErip, 1833, and C. nux BroperiP, 1833, were collected at the same time. I kept the four specimens of Conus dalli alive in a small aquarium on the ship. Three days after they were collected I attempted to feed them by introducing a specimen of the gastropod genus Acanthina (probably A. tyrianthina Berry, 1957) into the aquarium. After about half an hour, during which time the potential prey made several passes around the aquarium very near to, and sometimes over, the C. dalli specimens, the lar- gest cone began to show interest and extruded its pro- boscis. The proboscis was moved around to the posterior part of the prey, and the animal was stung on the postero-lateral portion of the foot. The Acanthina imme- diately retracted into its shell. The C. dalli again probed the aperture area with its proboscis, but I could not determine whether the prey was stung again. The C. dalli then rolled the Acanthina over with the front of its foot so that the aperture faced upward toward the cone. The front part of the foot remained in place over the * Operated under NSF Grants GB 6870 and GB 6871 siphonal notch, and again the proboscis made several additional probings of the aperture. Following the probings, the buccal area expanded over the aperture of the Acanthina, obscuring any further ob- servation. This condition prevailed for 27 minutes. At the end of this period the cone withdrew its buccal area but remained in position over the shell of the Acanthina for another 4 minutes before moving off. A check of the shell of the Acanthina immediately after the cone had moved off revealed that it was com- pletely empty, the whole animal having been consumed by the cone. I subsequently brought all four specimens of Conus dalli back to my aquaria at Moss Landing, where they were placed together with several other West American Conus species. A few days after introducing the Conus dalli into the aquarium I noticed a large number of empty shells of C. nux. This sudden increase in mortality of a cone that had theretofore lived well in aquaria led me to suspect that C’. dalli was preying on C. nux. This suspicion was confirmed when I placed one specimen of each of the two cone species in an isolation aquarium. The initial attack was not observed, but the position of the C. dalh while feeding on the C’. nux was similar to that observed for Acanthina. The Conus dalli showed a marked preference for C. nux over other Conus species. Conus dalli did not, for example, attack C. diadema or C. tiaratus of a size similar to that of C. nux even though they were left together in aquaria for several weeks. Whether C’. nux is the normal food of C. dalli in the natural environment is not known, but both species were collected together so it would not seem unreasonable to suspect this. LITERATURE CITED Hanna, G Datias 1963. | West American mollusks of the genus Conus; II. Calif. Acad. Sci. Occ. Papers 35:1 - 103; plts 1-11 (28 Jan. 1963) Koun, ALan J. 1959. The ecology of Conus in Hawaii. 29: 47 - 90. Ecol. Monogr. Vol. 11; No. 1 THE VELIGER Page 51 The Interrelationships of Certain Boreal and Arctic Species of Yoldia MOLLER, 1842 BY I. McT: COWAN University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (Plate 5; 9 Tables) MEMBERS OF THE PROTOBRANCH genus Yoldia are among the most widely distributed Lamellibranchia in northern oceans. They inhabit mud bottoms to depths of 100 fathoms + and may be the most abundant mollusk on them. Their abundance in the stomachs of bottom-feeding fishes suggests that they are an important element in the benthic food chains. Within this genus there is a group of species charac- terized by the simultancous presence of an elongate form with tapered, sub-acute posterior extremity, an approxi- mately central umbo, slender rather than bulbous form, a highly polished cuticle devoid of sculpture or surface pattern of any kind, and with an unstriated resilifer. Several names have been applied to members of this group: Yoldia amygdalea VALENCIENNES, 1846, described from specimens obtained on the cruise of the ‘Venus’ at Kamchatka. Yoldia hyperborea (LovEN) Toreti, 1859, was de- scribed on the basis of specimens from Spitzbergen. Yoldia limatula gardneri OupRoyp, 1935, from Gar- den Bay, Pender Harbour, British Columbia. Yoldia limatula (Say, 1831) was based upon speci- mens taken in fish stomachs in Massachusetts waters. Yoldia norvegica. DAUTZENBERG & FISHER, 1912 regarded the specimens from the coast of Norway as distinctive and applied this name, without des- ignating a holotype. Yoldia hyperborea limatuloides OCKELMANN, 1954, is the most recent name to appear. The type locality is Fossfjord, N. W. Iceland, but the form is stated to occur also from the Lofoten Islands to eastern Finmark. All have been described from shell characters alone and in only one instance (OcKELMANN) has an attempt been made to express the observed differences quantita- tively. He used 3 shell ratios in an attempt to distinguish Yoldia limatula, Y. sapotilla and Y. hyperborea and found them to be of little use. One of the problems of developing quantitative ex- pression of difference in the form of the lamellibranch shell is that in most species it grows throughout life. In many species also the shell changes in proportions with growth and thus renders dimensional ratios meaningless. This leaves the possibility that in any comparison of shell dimension between different populations the bias due to age or size may be great. In the present study I have attempted to avoid this problem by regressing pairs of measurements so as to develop an expression of the relative growth of the dif- ferent parts of the shell in each apparently distinct popu- lation. Analysis of covariance was used in making mathe- matical comparison between the equivalent regression coefficients of different populations. In order to develop these criteria my series for meas- uring were selected to contain the widest possible size range from each locality. METHODS Samples from individual geographic locations were given close visual inspection followed, in some cases, by trial comparison of ratios. Where no or almost no differences were apparent, the samples were pooled into composite samples suspected of representing definable entities of possible taxonomic value. Greatest length of the shell has been used as the basis of each regression. While the slope of the regression line is certainly a_ biologically meaningful expression, the position of the intercept on the Y axis is probably no less a characteristic of the population. Its biological meaning, however, is less ap- parent. Page 52 All statistical procedures were undertaken on a digital computer. MEASUREMENTS All measurements were taken with a sliding caliper equipped with a dial vernier. The measurements taken and the symbols employed to designate them on the ana- lytical tables are as follows: X = The greatest length of a single valve taken in a straight line. Left and right valves were measured in each instance where they were available and intact. Y1 = The greatest height of the valve from ventral mar- gin to peak of the umbo taken at right angles to the dorsal plane. Y2 = The length of the pallial sinus measured from the posterior tip of the shell. Y3 = The anterior length of the valve taken from highest point on the umbo to the most distant point on the anterior margin. Y4 = The posterior length measured similarly. Y5 = The number of teeth on the posterior side of the umbo. Y6 = The number of teeth on the anterior side of the umbo, Y5 + Y6 = thus the total number of teeth on the hinge line. The small teeth close to the resilifer were difficult to count on certain large specimens but every effort was made to expose them and count them accurately. POPULATIONS SELECTED FOR COMPARISON The selection of populations to be compared statistically is a Critical step in the process of exploring for significant differences. I know of no substitute for careful visual inspection of the field samples supported by trial com- parison of measurements and this has been the basis of selection used here. It was felt to be important to include for comparison those populations that had been previ- ously described as differing from others, along with those that the present study revealed. Thus the following stocks have been treated separately. 1. The form inhabiting the high Arctic seas around the world. 2. The population of Kamchatka, the southwest Ber- ing Sea and the Sea of Okhotsk. 3. The population from Iceland and the coast of Nor- way. 4, The population inhabiting the western Atlantic from Nova Scotia to Massachusetts. THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 1 5. A small collection from depths of 155 - 285 fathoms in Delgado Canyon, off Cape Mendocino, California. This population appears to be discontinuous from others, both geographically and by depth occupied. 6. The specimens from the coast of Alaska south of the Alaska Peninsula. 7. The many localities represented in Georgia Strait, British Columbia. 8. A sample from Malcolm Island, Queen Charlotte Strait, British Columbia. 9. A sample from Masset Inlet, Queen Charlotte Is- lands, British Columbia. At the same time some local variation seemed ap- parent along the coast of British Columbia where barriers to free dispersion seemed to be few. To explore the nature of variation under these circumstances, 3 populations (7, 8, 9) were included in comparison with specimens from the contiguous areas along the Alaskan coast. COMPARISONS Tables 1 to 6 present the results of covariance analysis derived from the regressions obtained from the 9 popu- lations. For purpose of interpretation I have used .01 as the level of significance to which systematic meaning can be attached. Let us first examine the several samples drawn from the relatively continuous north-south distribution along the coast of British Columbia and southeastern Alaska using the centrally placed Masset Inlet population as a basis of comparison (Table 4). Gross inspection sug- gests that the specimens from the Strait of Georgia are uniformly deeper for their length than those from the other areas. The only exception from this general con- dition is found in the small series that served as the type lot for Yoldia limatula gardneri OupRroyp. These are pro- portionately shallower, i.e. more slender than the Strait of Georgia form but can be matched among series from the outer coast of British Columbia and Alaska. It will be seen that the Queen Charlotte Islands stock is identical with the Malcolm Island stock in all slopes of the regressions and differs in only one intercept feature — that is the posterior length. In comparison with the Georgia Strait stock the regression of width on length is different, confirming the general impression referred to above. Two of the intercept figures are different, the pallial sinus scar and the anterior teeth. The Queen Charlotte Island sample is identical with the Alaskan sample in all features except length — width relationship. It differs from the California sample in two intercept features only. Vol. 11; No. 1 THE VELIGER Page 53 Table 1 Probability of Significance of Covariance Analysis of Slopes of Yoldia “norvegica” Compared with Y1/x Y2/x Y3/x Y4/x Y5/x Y6/x Y5+ Y6/x Y. hyperborea + — — — + + '- Y. amygdalea (K) ' — 1 — .05- .1 — — _ Y. amygdalea, Alaska — .1-.2 — 05 — _— — Y. limatula, Atlantic — — — .O1- 025 05-.1 01-025 .025 Probability of Significance of Covariance Analysis of Intercepts of Yoldia “norvegica” Compared with Y1/x Y2/x Y3/x Y4/x Y5/x Y6/x Y5+Y6/x Y. hyperborea + + aE =F + + + Y. amygdalea (K) .05- .1 — + .01- .025 + .005- .01 a Y. amygdalea, Alaska + + .001- .005 005 .025-.01 .025-.01 01 Y. limatula, Atlantic .1- .2 — + qF 01 + + * Kamchatka stock +indicates a probability of accidental occurrence < .001 — indicates a probability of accidental occurrence > .1 Table 2 Probability of Significance of Covariance Analysis of Slopes of Yoldia hyperborea “Compared with Yi/x Y2/x -Y3/x.—sY4/x.~=s«éY'Bs/x = Y6/x = Y6/x Y. amygdalea (K) + + 3 .025- .05 + + ar Y. amygdalea, Alaska + .001 — 1-2 + + oF Y. limatula, Atlantic + 01 .001 .001- .005 + at + Probability of Significance of Covariance Analysis of Intercepts of Yoldia hyperborea Compared with Y1/x Y2/x Y3/x Y4/x Y5/x Y6/x Y5+ Y6/x Y. amygdalea (K) + oF oP + + + + ¥. amygdalea, Alaska + at .01- .005 + + + + Y. limatula, Atlantic + + 1-2 + + + + Table 3 Probability of Significance of Covariance Analysis of Slopes of Yoldia amygdalea (K) Compared with Y1/x Y2/x Y3/x Y4/x Y5/x Y6/x Y5+ Y6/x Y. amygdalea, Alaska _— — — — — — —_— Y. amygdalea, Georgia Str. — — — — — .05 al Y. amygdalea, California _ = — — .005- .01 at + Probability of Significance of Covariance Analysis of Intercepts of Yoldia amygdalea (K) Compared with Y1/x Y2/x NS} / x Y4/x Y5/x Y6/x Y5+ Y6/x Y. amygdalea, Alaska + ain + ate .025- .05 2 .05- .1 Y. amygdalea, Georgia Str. ar .005- .01 + + .05- .1 ar .001- .005 Y. amygdalea, Humboldt — + + .005- .01 all ar 1-2 Thus along the 1000+ miles of coastline from the tential comparisons for any 2 of the sub-populations Alaskan Peninsula to the coast of California there is a that gave rise to the samples. These represent a bathy- great uniformity in the measurable features of this Yoldia, metric range from 10 fathoms to 200 fathoms. The con- with significant differences in no more than 2 of 14 po- clusion reached is that the Pacific Coast is inhabited by Page 54 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 1 Table 4 Probability of Significance of Covariance Analysis of Slopes of Yoldia amygdalea, Masset Compared with Y1/x Y2/x Y3/x Y4/x Y5/x Y6/x Y5+ Y6/x Y. amygdalea, Malcolm Isld. 1-2 — 1-2 1-2 — — — ¥. amygdalea, Georgia Str. + .05- .1 1-2 .05- .1 — — — Y. amygdalea, Alaska .001-.05 .1-.2 — — — — — Y, amygdalea, California .01- .02 — — — — 1-.15 2 Y. amygdalea (K) .005- .01 — — — — — — Y. norvegica, Norway-Iceld. .025- .05 .005- .01 Probability of Significance of Covariance Analysis of Intercepts of Yoldia amygdalea, Masset Compared with Y1/x Y2/x Y3/x Y4/x Y5/x Y6/x Y5+ Y6/x ° ¥. amygdalea, Malcolm Isld. _ —_— .1- .2 001-.005 .025-.05 .05-.1 .025- .05 Y. amygdalea, Georgia Str. .025- .5 + = = 1 001-.005 .01- .025 Y. amygdalea, Alaska _— _ .025- .05 .1-.2 1-2 .05- .1 .05- .1 Y. amygdalea, California + — l .001- .005 ne — — Y. amygdalea (K) + al + ar 2 .05- .1 ol Y. norvegica, Norway-Iceld. .001- .005 + .001-.005 .001-.005 .025-.05 .025 .025- .05 Table 5 Probability of Significance of Covariance Analysis of Slopes of Yoldia amygdalea (Bering “Intergrades”’) Compared with Y1/x Y2/x Y3/x Y4/x Y5/x Y6/x Y5+ Y6/x Y¥. amygdalea (K) .01- .025 05 05 — .O1 .001 .001 Y. hyperborea _— 1-2 — — .025- .05 l .05 Probability of Significance of Covariance Analysis of Intercepts of Yoldia amygdalea (Bering “Intergrades”) Compared with Y1/x Y2/x Y3/x ¥. amygdalea (K) aP .005- .01 + ¥. hyperborea + .05 ap a remarkably uniform stock of this species of Yoldia, displaying only minor geographic variation in form and in relative growth features. The most obvious of these variants is that occupying the heavily silted bottoms of the Strait of Georgia and Puget Sound. Table 6 summarizes the differences appearing in the comparisons of the 14 potential differences in numerical attributes that could occur between each of the stocks analysed. If these are arranged to reveal geographic. re- placement, the Pacific Coast stock differs from that of the Okhotsk-Kamchatka areas in a total of 5 of the Y4/x Y5/x Y6/x Y5+Y6/x .05 -1- .2 = a oF aR + oP indices, Kamchatka from the Arctic stock in 12, the Arc- tic from Norway-Iceland in 11, and from the American Atlantic coast stock in 13. The number of differences appearing between the Norway-Iceland form and the American Atlantic form is 5. The Arctic form therefore differs from all others with which it is in contact in 11 or more of the 14 features studied here, whereas none of the other stocks, even those separated by the entire extent of the Arctic Seas, and presently occurring in the North Atlantic and North Pa- cific, differ in more than 5 features when one uses the .01 Explanation of Plate 5 Figure 1: Yoldia amygdalea, Sakhalin Island, NW Pacific. X 1.2 Figure 2: Yoldia amygdalea, Masset, Queen Charlotte Island, British Columbia x1 Figure 3: Yoldia amygdalea, Strait of Georgia, British Columbia X 1.6 Figure 4: Yoldia amygdalea, California Coast X 1.2 Figure 5: Yoldia amygdalea, Iceland xX 1.6 Figure 6: Yoldia hyperborea, Point Barrow, Alaska xX 1.5 Figure 7: Yoldia hyperborea, Disco, Greenland xX 15 Figure 8: Yoldia limatula, Eel Pond, Massachusetts xX 2 THE VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 1 [Cowan] Plate 5 Figure 7 Vol. 11; No. 1 THE VELIGER Page 55 Table 6 Numbers of Features Distinguishing Stocks of Yoldia Comparison Number of Significant Differences Slope (max. 7) Interc. (max. 7) Totals (max. 14) (a) (b) (a) (b). (a) (b) Significant Significant at.01 at.05 at.01 at.05 1. Masset : Malcolm Isld. 0 0 1 3 1 3 2. Masset : Georgia Str. 1 1 1 4 2 5 3. Masset : Alaska 1 1 0 1 1 2 4. Masset : California 0 1 2 2 2 3 5. Masset : Kamchatka 1 1 4 4 5 5 6. Masset : Norway-Iceland 1 2 3 6 4 8 7. Arctic : Pacific Coast 5 5 7 7 12 12 8. Arctic : Amer. Atlantic 7 7 6 6 13 13 9. Arctic : Norway-Iceland 4 4 7 7 11 11 10. Arctic : Kamchatka 5 6 7 7 12 13 11. Kamchatka : Norway-Iceld. 0 1 4 5 4 6 12. Norway-Iceland : American Atlantic 0 3 5 5 5 8 level of probability as the criterion of significance. The .05 level of significance does not alter the situation re- specting the Arctic population. It is clearly a very differ- ent stock. This level, however, reveals the Georgia Strait stock as having more distinctive features than the other samples drawn from the NE Pacific. It also increases the apparent difference between the Norwegian and the A- merican Atlantic stocks. Returning to the differences at the .01 level (total “a” of Table 6), and comparing geographically contiguous stocks, it is possible to suggest that 3 clearly differentiable stocks exist: (1) that inhabiting the NE Pacific Ocean, the Sea of Okhotsk, the coast of Kamchatka and the southern Bering Sea; (2) the Arctic Seas of both hemi- spheres; and (3) the shallow waters of the North Atlantic Ocean including Iceland and the coast of Norway. The American Atlantic stock differs from Arctic and Pacific stocks to a similar degree. The data derived from the covariance analysis of regressions and intercepts reveals the numbers of criteria by which the several stocks differ from one another but tell us little about the nature or direction of the differ- ences. These details can be derived from inspection of the specimens and from the conventional measurements. They do not alter the conclusions to be reached from the present analysis. Specimens originally from Iceland and the coast of Norway are remarkably similar in general appearance to the specimens taken along the Pacific coast of North America. In fact, the characteristics by which they each differ from the Arctic population (Tables 1-4) are in general the same. One might ask, therefore, are they indeed the same organisms separated into the North At- lantic and North Pacific stocks by an inhospitable area of Arctic environment occupied by another form. A direct comparison between the North Pacific and North Atlantic stocks reveals that, at the .01 level of significance, they do not differ in any of the 7 regressions (Tables 1 & 4), but do so in 4-6 of the intercepts, de- pending upon which Pacific Coast sample is used in the comparison. Clearly then, the differences between the stocks of the two oceans is greater than the differences between any two of the samples from the Pacific coast of North America. The relationship between the North Atlantic stock and that of the American Atlantic is also interesting. As OckKELMANN (1954) pointed out, there are distinct and consistent differences in the shape of the shell between these two stocks. The American Atlantic specimens lack the anterior and posterior indentations in the ventral margin of the shell. There are differences also in the shape of the siphonal muscle scar. My data suggest two features of shell proportion and dentition (p < .025) and 5 intercept characteristics that distinguish the two Atlantic stocks. The general form of the North Atlantic specimens suggests that they might be the outcome of intergrada- tion between the Arctic form and that of the American Atlantic. Their geographic situation and the absence of any substantial evidence of intergradation along the coasts of Newfoundland and Labrador leave us with no evidence to support such an explanation. I have seen no Page 56 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 1 series of Yoldia from Newfoundland and Labrador, so future collections may require a re-examination of the relationships between the 3 forms encroaching upon the North Atlantic. TAXONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS It has been shown that there are few differences between several stocks of Yoldia separated widely along the Pacific coast of North America. It has also been shown that these do not differ substantially from the form inhabiting the Sea of Okhotsk and the Kamchatka coast. The first available name for this stock is Yoldia amygdalea VALEN- CIENNES, 1846. The name gardneri O.pRoyp, 1935, applied to a sup- posed subspecies of Yoldia limatula (now Y. amygdalea) in the northern part of the Strait of Georgia, British Columbia, appears to be without foundation. It referred to unusually slender examples that occur among the normal population. Yoldia hyperborea (Loven) Toreti, 1859 is the ac- cepted name applicable to the distinctive and remark- ably uniform stock of Arctic Seas. In my opinion, the characteristics of the stock from the North American coast of the Atlantic, taken with the absence of certain evidence of intergradation with Yoldia hyperborea to the north argue for recognizing this as a separate species under the name Y. limatula (Say, 1831), that has been used for this form for more than a century. OcKELMANN (1954) regarded the form of the North Atlantic as a subspecies of Yoldia hyperborea and applied the name limatuloides to it. It has now been shown that this population differs as profoundly from Y. hyperborea as any of the other stocks compared. The weight of evi- dence now suggests that this stock be regarded as con- specific with Y. amygdalea and that this species, as is the case with Y. myalis, is now divided into Atlantic and Pacific stocks differing but little from one another. If a subspecies designation be regarded as useful, the name Y. norvegica DAUTZENBERG & FiscHeER, 1912, though not described with a designated type specimen, was clearly applied to the form of the Norwegian coast and has priority over limatuloides of OckELMANN. This author regarded Y. norvegica as a synonym of Y. hyperborea, but the geographic reference by DAUTZENBERG & FISCHER seems to deny this. In this instance there seems to be no need for a separate designation for this stock. It is pertinent to ask whether there is any strong evidence of intergradation between stocks I have defined as possessing characteristics suggesting clear cut differ- ences. Thirteen specimens from the eastern Bering Sea (St. Matthews Island, Nunivak Island, N of Unimak Island, near Pribiloff Islands) originate from an area where intergradation between Yoldia hyperborea and Y. amygdalea might be expected to occur. They do indeed show characteristics of form apparently intermediate in some degree. Table 5 presents the probabilities of signi- ficance of covariance analyses comparing the possible intergrades with both the putative parent stocks. While Y. amygdalea differs from Y. hyperborea in 12 criteria, it differs from the supposed intermediates in 5 and Y. hyper- borea differs from them in 6. The differences are in the expected direction. On the strength of these comparisons, and others in- volving unmeasurable aspects of shell form there seems to be evidence that these specimens are indeed inter- mediates between the Arctic and North Pacific-Kam- chatka forms. The question then arises as to the inter- pretation to be placed upon this intergradation. It could be regarded as evidence that complete introgression is possible and that the two populations should be regarded as subspecific expressions of a single wide ranging species. In the genus Yoldia, Y. myalis and Y.thraciaeformis both occur in twin populations occupying the North Pacific and North Atlantic and separated by the Holarctic re- gion in which they do not now occur. In this study evidence is produced to reveal Y. amygdalea as similarly distributed. The first two species named have no surviving close relative in Arctic waters. One can conclude, there- fore, that they previously occupied Arctic waters but have been exterminated in them so recently that little or no morphological difference has developed between the relict populations. The failure of the Arctic stocks may well have occurred during the closure of Bering Straits, with the considerable alteration in the circulation of Arctic waters and possibly of local mid water habitats. A possible alternative explanation would involve conti- nuity of distribution through tropical waters at a time when the two Americas were separate. This seems less likely. In the case of Yoldia amygdalea rather than extermi- nation, evolutionary change gave rise to a form adapted to arctic conditions (Y. hyperborea). The evidence of the samples now available from the southern Bering Sea sug- gest that genetic isolation between the two species is incomplete. It seems to me, however, that the existence of the North Atlantic stock of Y. amygdalea, the very extensive range of this species in the Pacific, the extent of the area occupied by Y. hyperborea in the Arctic, and the absence of any evidence of intergradation between it and the Atlantic Y. amygdalea all point to species status as best expressing the relationship between Y. hyperborea and Y. amygdalea despite the evidence of some introgres- sion over a narrow area of contact in the Bering Sea. Vol. 11; No. 1 THE VELIGER Page 57 Table 7 Regression Formulae for Yoldia amygdalea Yoldia amygdalea (British Columbia & Alaska) N = 76 x/Y1 x/Y2 x/Y3 x/Y¥4_x/Y5._x/Y6 Y3/Y4 Y5/Y6 Correlation between 9896 .9896 .9959 .9949 .9016 .8821 .9867 .8821 Slope of Regression 4085 8=.5248 = 5252) 5331 = 9567 «1.2466 1.0025 1.2466 Intercept 1.0274 -.2126 .6928 -.6860 8.7841 12.4484 -1.2110 12.4485 Yoldia amygdalea (Kamchatka) N = 39 x/Y1 x/Y2 x/Y3 x/Y4 x/Y5 x/Y6 Y3/Y4 Y5/Y6 Correlation between 9749 9575 .9765 .9815 .8773 .3167 .9316 .8672 Slope of Regression 4239 =.5359 5146 = 5418 = .3908)=— 2977 Ss 9759 1.1894 Intercept 1.5869 -1.7885 2.3090 -1.7059 8.5078 19.0575 —2.4483 3.5084 Yoldia amygdalea (Iceland & Norway) N = 22 x/Y1 x/¥2 x/Y¥3 x/Y4_x/Y5.x/Y6 Y3/Y4 Y5/Y6 Correlation between 9855 .9601 .9795 .9842 .7486 .8453 .9547 9224 Slope of Regression 4250 .4476 .5329 4819 .4164 5777 8566 1.1334 Intercept 1.2303 1.0776 .7688 .7797 10.0510 11.8195 .8456 3.4409 Yoldia amygdalea (California) N = 27 x/Y¥1 x/Y2 x/Y3 x/Y4_x/Y5. x/Y6 Y3/Y4 Y5/Y6 Correlation between 9675 .9048 .9594 .9898 3466 .1850 .9482 .5634 Slope of Regression 4488 5059 5030 5469 1551 .2714 9992 .5672 Intercept 5167 = .7929 1.4659 -1.4475 1.9588 18.6113 -.9333 16.8931 Table 8 Regression Formulae for Yoldia hyperborea N = 107 x/Y1 x/Y2 x/Y3 x/Y¥4 x/Y5 x/Y6 Y3/Y4 Y5/Y6 Correlation between 9935 .9906 .9835 .9848 8445 .8384 9465 .9582 Slope of Regression 4898 4444 5686 .4882 .3867 .4336 .8114 1.0750 Intercept 0602 =.3732 -1.4579 2.2097 10.2074 13.9943 4.1348 3.1618 Table 9 Regression Formulae for Yoldia limatula N = 48 x/Y1 x/Y2_x/Y3._x/Y4__x/Y5.-x/Y6 Y3/Y4 Y5/Y6 Correlation between 9964 9965 .9990 9985 9102 9037 9967 .9674 Slope of Regression 4430 4692 5229 5268 .2799 .3431 1.0046 1.1942 Intercept 4979 §=.4674 ~=—.4598 »9=—.0071 12.3751 15.0194 -.1296 5069 Page 58 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 1 Résumé of Species Yoldia amygdalea VALENCIENNES, 1846 (Plate 5, Figures 1 - 5) Type locality: Kamchatka. Original description: VALENCIENNES, A. Mollusques (in) ABEL Du Petit-THouars. 1846. Voyage autour du monde de la Frégate Venus. plt. 23, fig. 6. Selected Synonymy: Y. amygdala [sic] REEvE, 1873. Conchologia Iconica 18: plt. 1, figs. 3a, 3b. Y. limatula (pars) Dati, 1921. U.S. Nat. Mus. Bull. 112: 13 (and elsewhere) (pars) La Rocegue, A., 1953. Nat. Mus. Canada 1953: 25; Otproyp, I.S., 1924. Stanford Univ. Publ. Geol. Sci. Y. gardneri Otproyp, 1935. Nautilus 49: 14 (Type locality: Garden Bay, Pender Harbour, Vancouver Island, B.C.) Y. norvegica DAUTZENBERG & FiIscHER, 1912. Résultats des campagnes scientifique ... par Albert I, Prince Souverain de Monaco. Fasc. 37: 403 (Type locality: Norway). ¥. hyperborea limatuloides OckELMANN, 1954. Medd. om Gronland 107 (7): 11 (Type locality: Fossfjord. N. W. Iceland). Distribution: This is the species from the Okhotsk Sea and Kam- chatka and from the Pacific Coast of North America, south of the Bering Sea into Northern California. The Atlantic stock occupies both coasts but comes north to Iceland but not Greenland. South further in the west than in the east. Specimens examined from: USSR: Avancha Bay; Plover Bay; Kamchatka coast at 55°57’N, 162°20’E; Okhotsk Sea at 52°43’N, 155°41’E; Aniva Bay, South Sakhalin Island. NE Pacific: Alaska: Redfish Bay, Stikine Delta; St. Matthews Is.; Nunivak Is.; N of Unimak Is.; near Pribiloff Islands. British Columbia: Masset, Queen Charlotte Island; Malcolm Island; Smith Inlet; Beaver Harbour; Okeover Arm; Tofino Inlet; Barclay Sound; Georgia Strait (many localities) . Washington: off San Juan Island. California: Delgado Canyon off Buck Creek, Mendocino County. I have seen no specimens from Oregon or from the outer coast of Washington. Iceland: Fossfjord. Norway: Lofoten Islands; Bergen; Ramsfjord; Vadso. Western Atlantic: 40°29’N, 70°46’W; Bedford Basin; N of Sable Island, Nova Scotia; Bradilla in Gulf of St. Lawrence; Grand Manan Island; off Halifax, Nova Scotia. Yoldia hyperborea (LovEN) TorE., 1859. (Plate 5, Figures 6, 7) Type locality: Spitzbergen. Original description: Torexi, O. 1859. Bidrag till Spitzenbergens Molluskenfauna. Stockholm, pp. 149-150; plt. 2, figs.6.a,6b. Selected Synonymy: Yoldia arctica M. Sars, 1851. Nyt Maf. f Naturv., 6 (2). Kristiania. Nucula sapotilla REEVE, 1855 (non Goutp, 1841) (in) BEx- cHER, E., The last of Arctic voyages. vol. 2, London. Yoldia limatula G.O. Sars, 1878. Mollusca regionis arcticae Norvegiae, Christiania. Yoldia glacialis Gray, 1828, La RocguE, 1953. Nat. Mus. Can- ada, Bull. 129. Distribution: Believed to be circumboreal in the Arctic basin, but I have seen no specimens, nor published records of occurrence, from the North American Arctic east of Point Barrow and west of Foxe Basin; nor from the Siberian Arctic east of Novaya Zemlya. Specimens examined from: Spitzbergen (several localities); Novaya Zemlya; Disco, Green- land; West Coast Greenland; Foxe Basin; Hudson Bay; and many stations in Canadian Eastern Arctic; Point Barrow, Alaska. OcKELMANN (1954) cites specimens from the Murman coast and the Kara Sea. Yoldia limatula Say, 1831. (Plate 5, Figure 8) Type locality: Nahant, Massachusetts. Original description: Say, R. 1831. American Conchology, prt. 2, pit. 12, 3 figs. Distribution: The North American coast from Nova Scotia to North Carolina. Specimens examined from: : Halifax, Nova Scotia; Sand Island, New Brunswick; Casco and Frenchman’s Bay, Maine; Woods Hole, Massachusetts; New- port, Rhode Island; Rariton Bay, New Jersey; Cape Hatteras, North Carolina. I have seen two specimens from close to Halifax that suggest that intergradation may occur between Yoldia limatula and Y. amygdalea. However, the evidence is too meager to interpret. Vol. 11; No. 1 THE VELIGER Page 59 Notes on Cryptochiton stelleri (MIDDENDORFF, 1846) G. E. MacGINITIE NETTIE MacGINITIE Route 1, Box 93A, Friday Harbor, Washington 98250 (Plate 6) For QUITE A NUMBER OF YEARS, we have been intrigued by the fact that the giant chiton Cryptochiton stelleri is almost invariably free of epibiotic growths. As we have emphasized (MacGinitie & MacGinitie, 1968), there are nearly always exceptions to any generalization, so it is not surprising that the defense mechanism of the chiton is occasionally damaged or fails to function. On rare occasions, a barnacle, a tuft of seaweed, or a tunicate may be found growing on the giant chiton. These ex- ceptions are no doubt due to some injury sustained from a rolling rock or floating debris or other abrasive causes. The present study was begun in an attempt to deter- mine the means by which Cryptochiton stelleri keeps its surface free of epibiotic growth. In order to do this, it was first necessary to learn something of the food and habits of the animal so that a number of them could be maintained in aquaria in as healthy and normal condi- tions as possible. FOOD anp HABITS This chiton species is found from low tidal exposures down to a depth of 50 or 60 feet or possibly deeper. Its range is from San Nicolas Island to Alaska and across to Japan. It is most abundant in the northern part of its range. Because its food consists mainly of Ulva, Monastrema, Iridia, or other thin-fronded algae, it may be found where such growth is abundant. We have kept specimens in our laboratory for more than a year and tried them with different types of seaweed, but they show a decided preference for Ulva and Monostrema. We have withheld food until they were hungry enough to eat, very sparingly, some heavier types of seaweed, even including the stipe of Nereocystis. However, they are able to go for months without food of any kind. Examin- ation of the fecal material reveals that the heavier types of seaweed pass through with little apparent di- gestion. Even some of the preferred sea weeds, such as Ulva, pass through in larger pieces than one would expect. These giant chitons are extremely slow-moving crea- tures and move very short distances, say a few inches, in a night when browsing. Those we have kept in aquaria seem to be strictly nocturnal. Very rarely does one move about during the day. Two that we have kept in an aquarium at temperatures ranging from 3°C to 5 or 6°C ceased all visible activity while the temperature remained this low. As most of the seaweeds are annuals, we doubt that even in their natural environment these chitons feed to any extent during the winter months. Although the chitons of this species reject plants or animals that might adhere to their dorsal surface, they do have commensals. A scale worm Arctonoe vittata (GRUBE, 1855) and a pinnotherid crab Opisthopus transversus RaTHBUN, 1893, are often found in the gill chamber, usually singly, but occasionally together. GROWTH anpb AGE Cryptochiton stellert is the largest chiton in the world. Specimens 330mm (13 inches) long have been recorded. The largest specimen we used was 240mm long by 115 mm wide. It was about 32 mm high at the highest point. The smallest was 95mm by 60mm. This species grows very slowly. From a count of growth lines on the dorsal valves, it appears that any Cryptochiton stelleri that is 7 or 8 inches long or longer is at least 20 years old. On most of the valves, the growth lines die out and become obscure about two thirds of the way in from the outer edge. We have counted the growth Page 60 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 1 lines on many valves that showed up to 18 or 20 lines and we concluded that such specimens were more than 25 years old. We have not checked the reproduction care- fully, but the lines of growth and habits of the animal indicate that it spawns but once a year. Small juvenile specimens are seldom found. This scarcity of young is typical of marine invertebrates that live a long time. MECHANISM ror KEEPING CLEAN We believe we have found the answer to how Cryptochi- ton stellert keeps so free of epibiotic growth. To under- stand how this is accomplished, one must know something about the structure of the dorsal integument. The entire dorsal surface of the animal is covered with tufts of fine spicules of calcium carbonate (Plate 6, Figures 2 and 3). Sometimes these tufts, as well as the integument, are a dark brick red over the entire surface but in some specimens the surface is mottled by patches of grayish tufts of spicules. The tufts of spicules terminate abruptly at the edge of the dorsal surface where the integument turns under to form the under side. The number of spicules per tuft varies from about 25 to 365 or over. On a specimen 217mm long, the number of tufts per square centimeter was fairly uniform, averaging 118 tufts. These tufts of spicules may stand erect in tight vertical columns or they may spread out more or less in the form of rosettes. The individual spicules are 1 mm long or some- what longer. They are individually controlled, so that some of the spicules in a tuft may stand erect while the others spread out. A tuft of spicules originates as a bulbous structure within the integument, with a small opening to the sur- face, and gradually evaginates until it becomes only a depression on the surface with a full bloom of spicules (Plate 6, Figure 1). The bulbous structure is lined with cells, each of which secretes a spicule. When a tuft of spicules is at the surface and functional, each spicule is controlled by a cell at the base. Our first reaction was to suppose that these tufts spread into rosettes to prevent the settling of larvae on the integument, but quite the reverse is true. The introduction of fine planktonic material to the surface of the chiton causes the tufts of spicules that are spread in rosettes to become erected into columns. Further study revealed that these columns of spicules were supporting a sheet of mucus. We have never found a dye that will stain secreted mucus. It is possible to stain preserved mucous cells, but not fresh mucus itself. It is impossible to demonstrate mucous layers by any means except by the introduction of finely divided material. To show the presence of mucus, we have nearly always used detritus (MacGInITIE & MacGiniTig, 1968, p. 11) because it does not in any Way irritate the secreting animal. Stained sections of the integument show that mucous glands are abundant and open to the surface in the areas between the tufts of spicules. Though there are no tufts of spicules on the under side, mucous secreting cells con- tinue to be present in that portion of the integument that turns under at the edge. With secretions from the mucous glands, Cryptochiton is rapidly able to cover its dorsal surface with a sheet of mucus from 1 to 2mm thick. As is well known, when mucus comes in contact with water, it quickly swells. As has been shown before (MacGrnitTIEz, 1945), mucus, at least as it is used by several invertebrate animals (MacGinitie & MacGinitiz, 1968, pp. 186, 203, 336), will prevent the passage of anything larger than 40 A. Although mucus allows water to flow through it almost unimpeded, it will prevent the passage through it of any larvae, algal spores, bacteria, or viruses — or even molecules with a molecular weight of 160000 or larger. By placing some detritus or fine planktonic material on the surface of Cryptochiton, the presence of mucus is easily observed. We were unable to determine whether the stimulus of a settling larva causes secretion of mucus only in that local area or whether the mucus covers more of the surface of the chiton. Evidence points to a pro- gressive weakening of the mucous secretion in specimens Explanation of Plate 6 Cryptochiton stelleri (MippENDoRFF, 1846) Figure 1: Section through the dorsal integument; 60. The irreg- ular diagonal line is the upper surface of the integument. Lower left: developing tuft of spicules. Upper center: mucus secreting glands. Upper right: section through depression where a tuft of spicules is attached. At the base of each spicule is a cell that regulates the position of the spicule. Figure 2: View of portion of dorsal surface, showing tufts of spicules; X 2. Figure 3: Same as Figure 2; <4. Note that the tufts of spicules are spread into rosettes. [MacGinitie « MacGinirtie] Plate 6 Tue VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 1 Vol. 11; No. 1 of Cryptochiton the longer they are kept in aquaria. In specimens that have been kept in tanks 3 or 4 months or longer, we have found as many as 6 different organisms among the spicules, although they were not attached to the integument. One of the functions of the spicules is to hold the sheet of mucus in place. The invasion of the surface by foreign material stimulates the animal to secrete and discharge mucus and draw the spicules together into columns. How- ever, most of the time, the tufts are spread in the form of rosettes (Plate 6, Figure 3), which undoubtedly is a sort of passive way of excluding larger larvae and tiny ani- mals from its surface. There is no indication that a toxic substance is secreted, for larvae that are introduced onto the sheet of mucus do not respond as they would to a toxic material. They continue to struggle for a much longer time than they would if affected by a toxin. The surface of the sheet of mucus gradually disintegrates and the entrapped organic material is carried away by cur- rents in the water. THE VELIGER Page 61 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We are grateful to the personnel of the Friday Harbor Laboratories of the University of Washington for several courtesies. Through Dr. Paul Illg, we were able to use for study and photographic purposes the excellent slides of the integument (Plate 6, Figure 1) of Cryptochiton stel- leri made by Deborah L. Christensen, microtechnician at the University of Washington, Seattle. We also wish to thank SCUBA divers Rich Bettger and Jerry Brown of Everett, Washington, for obtaining specimens for us. LITERATURE CITED MacGrnitiE, GEoRGE EBER 1945. The size of the mesh openings in mucous feeding nets of marine animals. Biol. Bull. 88 (2): 107-111 MacGinitie, Georce Esper & Nettie MaAcGInitie 1968. Natural history of marine animals. 2%? ed. xii+523 pp.; 286 text figs. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York Page 62 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 1 Further Observations on the West American Marginellidae With the Descriptions of Two New Species BY BARRY ROTH 1217 Waller Street, San Francisco, California 94117 AND EUGENE COAN Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305 (Plate 7; 2 Text figures; 1 Map) IN oUR ACCOUNT oF the west American Marginellidae (Coan & Rorn, 1966), we stated that with further work on the family, especially the examination of more speci- mens, our ideas would probably change. In addition, we felt certain that the article would arouse interest among workers, both to study the material they had on hand and to collect additional specimens. Both anticipations have proved correct. We have accumulated comments adding to and correcting our published account. It seems appropriate to make the new information available at this time. 1. Marginella (Prunum) sapotilla Htnps, 1844 (Plate 7, Figures 1, 2) Coan & Rortn, 1966: 279 - 280; plt. 48, figs. 1-3; text fig. 1 Photographs of the lectotype of Marginella evax Lt, 1930, are presented on the Plate. The synonymy of M. evax and M. (P.) sapotilla remains certain. Because L1’s photograph was poor and because his article is not readily available, illustrations of this lectotype are included here. In addition we are able to refine the distributional information. The species has been found from Bahia Honda, Panama, to Bella Vista, Panama, and as far off the mainland as Isla Pedro Gonzales in the Bay of Panama. Ecuadorian records remain uncertain. PARKER (1964) reported it from the Gulf of California. His spe- cimen is in the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard University and proves to be a young Olivella. 2. Marginella (Prunum) albuminosa Daur, 1919 (Plate 7, Figures 3, 4) Coan & RotH, 1966: 281 - 282; plt. 48, fig. 11 Records and correspondence in the Division of Mol- lusks at the United States National Museum indicate that Dr. Alfred Dugés sent the unique specimen, along with other material, to Dall in 1895, and that Dall initially identified it as Marginella (Prunum) curta SOWERBY, 1832. There is some indication that Dugés’ shipment may have been poorly packed and have arrived at the USNM somewhat mixed. Thus there is additional reason to doubt the occurrence of this species in the west American fauna. Correspondence in the USNM files suggests that Dugés may also have sent some of his material to the Paris Museum, but a search there prompted by our in- quiry turned up nothing. We have not yet located other specimens of this species from any province in any muse- um. STANTON (1966) reported a specimen of Marginella (Prunum) from the Castaic Formation (Upper Miocene) of Los Angeles County, California, as “Marginella cf. M. albuminosa Dau.” This is a new geologic record for the family and genus in northwest America. STANTON’s species will probably require a name of its own in light of the continuing doubt about Dugés’‘type specimen. Two better photographs of the holotype of M. ig nee albuminosa are provided here. Vol. 11; No. 1 3. Persicula porcellana (GMELIN, 1791) (Plate 7, Figures 5, 6) Coan & Roru, 1966: 282 - 283 (pars) ; plt. 48, figs. 12 - 15; non ibid.: plt. 48, figs. 16-17 In our earlier article we designated one of the speci- mens therein illustrated ( plt. 48, figs. 14, 15) “lecto- type” of Marginella tessellata LaMaRcK, 1822 - a mistake, since, as the only specimen in the Lamarckian collection, it is assuredly the holotype. At the same time we designated the identical specimen neotype of GmeE.in’s Voluta porcellana — the specimen figured by Cuemnirz (1788: plt. 150, figs. 1419, 1420), on which GMELIN based his species, having been lost. We hoped to stabilize nomenclature by this step, which we took after consultation with several other malacologists. At the time of that writing we had examined many west American specimens, but no Caribbean ones. Now we have seen, from the Caribbean, specimens that look like LAMarcK’s type and still others which closely resemble the original Cuemnirz figures. Some species of Persicula are mor- phologically consistent; others show considerable varia- tion even within local populations (Coan « Rot, 1966: pp. 284 - 285). We suspect that there is only one, some- what variable species in the Caribbean. In light of the Caribbean specimens, there is much less doubt what form Chemnitz had; in the absence of serious doubt, our neotype designation seems superfluous. Since it helps stabilize the nomenclature, however, and since its retrac- tion could cause needless additional confusion, we intend to let the designation stand. Lamarck’s holotype of Marginella tessellata is illus- trated here with two better photographs. It is without locality data, but most likely came from the Caribbean, considering the early date of Lamarck’s publication. Voluta porcellana was incorrectly stated by Gmelin to have come from the Indian Ocean. While the Atlantic species retains the name Persicula porcellana, the Pacific species, isolated from it since the Pliocene by the Isthmus of Panama, requires a new name as follows: Persicula accola RotH & Coan, spec. nov. (Plate 7, Figures 7,8 - Holotype) Persicula porcellana (GMELIN), CoaAN &« RotH, 1966: 282 - 283 (pars); plt. 48, figs. 16-17; non Gmeuin, 1791: 3449 (species 139) Description of Holotype: Shell of moderate size, solid; elongate-ovate, narrower anteriorly; pale yellowish-tan, with about 10 spiral rows of dark reddish-brown, more or less rectangular blotches which show a tendency to- ward doubling with maturity; entirely covered with a THE VELIGER Page 63 thin glaze of translucent whitish enamel; outer lip thick- ened, finely denticulate, white, tinged with brown along outer edge; inner lip covered by a pad of white callus; spire low, covered with clear enamel, circled by a solid brown band; aperture even, slightly wider anteriorly, white within; anterior canal deep, oblique; columella with 7 folds, second fold from anterior end widest, most anterior fold at base of columella. Dimensions of Holotype: Length 13 mm; width 8.2 mm. Paratypes: Of the 3 paratypes, 2 are worn mature specimens and 1 is a live-collected, sub-mature speci- men with a sharp, uncalloused outer lip. All 3 differ very slightly from the holotype in arrangement of the rows of brown blotches. Dimensions of Paratypes: 1: Length 12.5 mm; width 7.5 mm (live) 2: Length 13.3 mm; width 8.2 mm 3: Length 12.2 mm; width 7.2 mm Type Locality: Isla Coiba, Panama (about 7°30’ N by 81°45’ W) ; collected by A. Mendez. Discussion: The pattern of rows of rectangular blotches distinguishes Persicula accola from all other west Ameri- can species of the genus. A key to the west American species (in which this species is identified as “Persicula porcellana’) appears in Coan & Rotu, 1966, p. 278. This species is morphologically very similar to its Carib- bean analogue, Persicula porcellana (GmeEun). Although museums contain only a few lots of each species from which to make comparisons, some minor differences have been noted. First, the west American species is broadest much posterior to the middle of the body whorl, while the Caribbean one tends to be more nearly ellipsoidal. Persicula porcellana tends also to be more obese. Second, as in the Chemnitz figures mentioned above, P. porcellana may have smaller spots, especially in the northern part of its range — Honduras, Panama, Venezuela. Brazilian specimens have larger spots. Persicula accola has, in gen- eral, larger, squarer spots. Third, the posterior end of the outer lip of the Caribbean species tends to be pro- duced slightly more than that of the west American form. Etymology: The specific name derives from the Latin noun for “neighbor.” Material Examined and Range: This species has evi- dently been collected only 4 times, and 2 of these lots have been divided among several museums. The recorded localities are Isla Coiba, Isla Jicaron, and Bahia Montijo, all in roughly the same area of Panama. Deposition of Types: Holotype: USNM 513647; Para- types (3): USNM 665526. 4. Persicula bandera CoaAN & Rotu, 1965 Coan & Rotn, 1965: 67 - 69; pit. 12, figs. 1-5 Coan & Ror, 1966: 285; plt. 50, figs. 38, 39 Page 64 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 1 When first describing Persicula bandera, we compared it to the closely related P hilli (SmitH, 1950), but not to any species from the Atlantic. We have recently ob- tained a photograph of the holotype of Marginella multilineata SowerBy, 1846 from the British Museum (Natural History) (Plate 7, Figures 9, 10); that species is a Persicula, very similar to P. bandera. Marginella multilineata was described from a speci- men in the Cuming collection, picked up by a Mr. Dyson at “Belieze [sic], Bay of Honduras.” Belize, Brit- ish Honduras, and the Gulf of Honduras are on the Atlantic coast of Central America; and other Dyson- collected material from “Honduras” has proven to be Atlantic, so there is no reason to doubt the Caribbean locality. REEvE (1865) compared M. multilineata to M. interrupta LAMARCK, 1822 (= Persicula interruptoline- ata [MEGERLE von MUHLFELD, 1816]), a variable Carib- bean and west African species; and Tomutn (1917) in- correctly synonymized the two. It seems plausible that, as with so many other mar- ginellids, analogous Atlantic and Pacific species are in- volved. If it ever were to be shown conclusively that Dyson’s shell came from the Pacific side of Central America, the name Persicula bandera would become a synonym of PR multilineata (SowERBy, 1846). 5. Persicula hilli (Smitu, 1950) (Plate 7, Figures 11, 12) Coan & Rotu, 1966: 285; plt. 50, figs. 40, 41 At the time of our earlier review, we were unable to locate the type specimens of this species. Through the Explanation Figures 1, 2: Marginella (Prunum) sapotilla Hinps, 1844. Lecto- type of Marginella evax Li, Columbia Univ. Paleo. Coll. 22118; Panama Bay, 2.1 (ventral and dorsal views) Figures 3, 4: Marginella (Prunum) albuminosa Dat, 1919. Holotype, USNM 10168, “West Mexico,” 1.5 (ventral and dorsal views) Figures 5, 6: Persicula porcellana (GMELIN, 1791). Neotype of Voluta porcellana Gmeuin and holotype of Marginella tessellata Lamarck, Mus. Hist. Nat. Geneva, no locality given; < 2.1 (vent- ral and dorsal views). Photographs courtesy of Dr. E. Binder Figures 7, 8: Persicula accola RoruH & Coan, spec. nov. Holotype, USNM 513647, Isla Coiba, Panama, X 3 (ventral and dorsal views) Figures 9, 10: Persicula multilineata (SowERBy, 1846). Holotype, British Museum (Natural History), Cuming Coll., “Belieze, Bay of Honduras,” X 3 (ventral and dorsal views). Photographs cour- tesy of and © by British Museum (Natural History) Figures 11, 12: Persicula hilli (Smitu, 1950). Lectotype, Univ. Alabama, Maxwell Smith Coll. 15374, Bahia Chamela, Jalisco, Mexico, X 2.6 (ventral and dorsal views) courtesy of Dr. Herbert T: Boschung, we have been loaned the type lot from the Maxwell Smith collection in the Museum of Natural History at the University of Alabama at Tuscaloosa. The type lot consists of 4 speci- mens. SmiTH (1950: plt. 4, fig. 6) figured 2 of these. We hereby designate as lectotype the specimen we have illustrated here — the specimen which SmirH figured in ventral view — leaving 3 paralectotypes. The lectotype measures 14.7mm in length and 9.7mm in width. Smitu’s figured paralectotype is 14.5mm long and 9.2 mm wide. 6. Volvarina sp., cf. V. taeniolata MOrcu, 1860 Among uncatalogued material at Stanford University, we have seen one immature specimen belonging to the genus Volvarina, collected at Salinas, Ecuador, in 1951 by Dr. Donald L. Frizzell. This specimen extends the known west American range of the genus to South America. Adult specimens will have to be studied to determine whether this is Morch’s species. 7. Cystiscus politulus (Dati, 1919) (Plate 7, Figures 13, 14; Map) Coan & Rotu, 1966: 290-291; plt. 51, fig. 64 Hyalina myrmecoon Datu, 1919: 308 Cystiscus myrmecoon (Dati), Coan & Roru, 1966: 291; plt. 51, fig. 65 Examination of additional material now leads us to synonymize these two species. Since both of Datt’s names date from the same article, we are acting as “first of Plate 7 Figures 13, 14: Cystiscus politulus (Dat, 1919). Hypotype, US NM 268953, Bahia Magdalena, Baja California Sur, Mexico, 25m, <9 (ventral and dorsal views) Figure 15: Cystiscus jewettu (CARPENTER, 1857). Hypotype, SU PTC 9943, Punta Abreojos, Baja California Sur, Mexico, x 8.8 (ventral view) Figure 16: Cystiscus jewettu. Hypotype, CASGTC 13107, Point Pinos, Monterey County, California, X 8.8 (ventral view) Figures 17, 18: Cystiscus palantirulus RoTH & COoAN, spec. nov. Holotype, AMNH 128732, Los Frailes Bay, Baja California Sur, Mexico, 37- 73m, X 8.8 (ventral and dorsal views) Figure 19: Kogomea polita (CARPENTER, 1857). Lectotype, Brit- ish Museum (Natural History) 57.6.4.2108/1, Mazatlan, Sinaloa, Mexico, X 35 (ventral view). Photograph courtesy of and © by British Museum (Natural History) Figure 20: Cypraeolina margaritula (CARPENTER, 1857). Lecto- type, British Museum (Natural History) 57.6.4.2109/1, Mazatlan, Sinaloa, Mexico, X 16.8 (ventral view). Photograph courtesy of and © by British Museum (Natural History) TuHeE VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 1 [RotH &« Coan] Plate 7 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 9 Figure 11 Figure 12 Figure 13 Figure 14 Figure 15 Figure 16 Figure 17 Figure 18 Figure 19 Figure 20 Vol. 11; No. 1 THE VELIGER Page 65 LEGEND Rangeof Cysts plus: — ———E—————_——> Range of Cystiscus jewettii: —a_=» aa=> a= Range of Cystiscus palantirulu’: —e a= @ Isla Guadalupe MEXICO Punta Isla Pacific Ocean Be Poe “aN Monserrate’: ” Ranges of the West American Species of Cystiscus Page 66 revisers” in the sense of Article 24a of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. The holotype of Hya- lina myrmecoon is simply an elongate specimen of C’ystzs- cus politulus. Additional range records include the southern Gulf of California (Map). The Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History collection includes specimens recently collected by Dr. James H. McLean at Cabo San Lucas, Pulmo Reef, and Isla Cerralvo, Baja California Sur. We have tentatively determined as Cystiscus politulus a poor specimen from Bahia de las Banderas, mainland Mexico, so collectors should keep watch for the species in that area as well. A specimen from Bahia Magdalena on the outer coast of Baja California Sur is here illustrated and discussed in connection with the description of a new species. 8. Cystiscus jewettti (CARPENTER, 1857a) (Plate 7, Figures 15, 16; Text figure 1; Map) Coan & Rortn, 1966: 291; plt. 51, figs. 66 - 68 From its previously reported distribution (Monterey, California, to Isla San Martin and Isla Guadalupe, Baja California) we can now extend the known range south- ward to Punta Abreojos, Baja California Sur. Note that this is still considerably north of the range of the next species. We are illustrating a specimen from Punta Abre- ojos and one from the northern end of the range, Point Pinos, Monterey County, California, for comparison with the new species described below. Cystiscus jewetti is common in the intertidal area at Pacific Grove, Monterey County, California, where speci- mens were collected and observed in August, 1967 (Text figure 1). Throughout the period of observation, the THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 1 mantle was never extruded over the top of the shell of C. jewettii in the manner of Cypraeolina margaritula in the same dish. 9. Cystiscus palantirulus RoTH & CoAN, spec. nov. (Plate 7, Figures 17, 18 [Holotype]; Map) Cystiscus sp., Coan & Roru, 1966: 291 - 292; plt. 51, figs. 69 - 70 We have now seen a sufficient number of specimens of this form to propose a name for it. Description of Holotype: Shell pear-shaped, broad and evenly rounded posteriorly, elongate and narrow anteri- orly; white, smooth, highly polished; spire very low, covered by irregular callousing; outer lip extending high on body whorl, forming a 90° arc slightly anterior to the spire, most strongly thickened by callus posteriorly; a- pertural margin (columellar area) forming a long S-curve, concave anteriorly, very bulbous posteriorly, scarcely thickened by callus, with 2 large folds at base of colu- mella and 4 smaller ones posterior to them, evenly decreasing in size, extending very slightly onto face of body whorl; aperture moderately wide anteriorly; ante- rior margin of aperture rounded; anterior end slightly flaring and twisted toward columella. Dimensions of Holotype: Length 3.5 mm; width 2.1 mm. Dimensions of Paratypes: 1. Length 3.1 mm; width 1.7 mm 2: Length 3.2 mm; width 1.7 mm Paratypes: The two paratypes differ from the holotype in the following details: the apex of Paratype 1 projects as a minute nubbin; the apex of Paratype 2 is worn to a smooth dome; in curving to meet the spire, the outer lip of Paratype 1 changes direction by less than 90°. Figure 1 Cystiscus jewettii (CARPENTER, 1857) Living specimen, Pacific Grove, Monterey County, California. Intertidal xX 14 Vol. 11; No. 1 THE VELIGER Page 67 Type Locality: Station 89 of the Puritan-American Mu- seum of Natural History Expedition to West Mexico: Los Frailes Bay, Baja California Sur (Gulf of California), 23°21’ N by 109°25’ W, 20-40 fathoms, fine sand, 19 April 1957, taken with the Puritan dredge. Deposition of Types: Mollusk collection, American Mu- seum of Natural History, New York, No. 128732 (Holo- type) and AMNH No. 77942 (Paratypes). Range: Specimens of C'ystiscus palantirulus in other mu- seum and private collections indicate a range limited to the southwestern part of the Gulf of California, from off Isla Monserrate to Cabo San Lucas, Baja California Sur (see Map), with one possible specimen from Aca- pulco, Guerrero. Collection records range from 6 to 80m depth, plus 2 shore-collected dead shells. In addition to the type lot, we have examined the following material: Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History: Invert. Zool. Loc. 66-12, Cabo San Lucas, diving in 6 - 24m near the pinnacle - 3 specimens Invert. Zool. Loc. 66-17, dredged in 18m between El Tule and Punta Palmilla, Baja California Sur - 35 specimens Invert. Zool. Loc. 66-23, Between Punta Ventana and Isla Cerralvo, Gulf of California, 18- 27m - 12 specimens California Academy of Sciences: No. 24062, Bahia San Lucas - 2 specimens San Diego Museum of Natural History: No. 33654, Isla Espiritu Santo, Gulf of California - 1 speci- men, juvenile Locality L-2155, Isla Espiritu Santo - 3 specimens Stanford University Paleontological Type Collection: No. 9849, 10 miles north of Isla Espiritu Santo - one speci- men (figured by Coan « Rorn, 1966) Collection of Dr. Donald R. Shasky, Redlands, California: 37 - 73m off Isla Monserrate, Gulf of California Collection of Dr.S. Stillman Berry, Redlands, California: No. 10074, Acapulco, Guerrero - one specimen cf. C. pa- lantirulus, but not recently re-examined Discussion and Comparisons: A comparison of Cystiscus palantirulus with the other 2 west American species of Cystiscus is presented in Table 1. Neither Cystiscus jewettii nor C. palantirulus has yet been taken in the area between Punta Abreojos and Cabo San Lucas (see Map). This apparent gap of about 400 coastal miles between the ranges supports the notion of C. palantirulus as a specifically distinct population. In addition, although C. jewettii exhibits consistent differ- ences in form between the northern and the southern ends of its range (Plate 7, Figures 15, 16; and Table 1), and, although there is some individual variation between specimens from a single locality, there is no tendency for its populations to take on the distinctive shape of C. palantirulus. In areas where their ranges overlap, Cystiscus politulus (Plate 7, Figures 13, 14) can be distinguished from C. jewettu or C. palantirulus by its narrower, more elongate aspect, and by its generally smaller size. Etymology: The palantiri, from which the specific name is derived, are magical globes of crystal mentioned in the fiction of J. R. R. Tolkien. Table 1 Cystiscus politulus Size: Small for genus; 2.9mm (average of Medium to large for genus; 4.8mm (average of 2 northern specimens) 10 from 6 localities) Cystiscus jewetti Cystiscus palantirulus Medium for genus 3.2mm (average of 27 from 9 localities) 3.1mm (average of 4 from Pta. Abreojos) Shape: Elongate; not shouldered; length to width ratio 1.8 (average of 10 from 6 localities) Texture: Callousing: Thin Spire: Low to slightly elevated; not callus- covered Outer Lip: Slightly thickened at maturity Aperture: Anterior end rounded, even Columella: Range: (see Map) Gulf of California; intertidal to 60m 50m Ovate; shouldered; length/width ra- tio 1.5 (average of 6 from 3 local.) Much thickened at maturity Anterior end effuse, even Pear-shaped; shouldered; length/width ratio 1.6 (average of 27 from 9 localities) All species shiny, translucent Often thick, esp. on northern specim. Thin Low to well elevated (in south. spec.) ; Low; sometimes mamillate northern specimens callus-covered Slightly thickened Anterior end effuse, twisted to left in dorsal view Much the same in all 3 species; also variable from specimen to specimen Santa Barbara, California, to southern Monterey, California, to Pta. Abreojos, Isla Monserrate to Cabo San Lucas, Baja California Sur; intertidal to Baja California Sur; 6 to 80m Page 68 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 1 10. Kogomea polita (CARPENTER, 1857b) (Plate 7, Figure 19)’ Coan & Roru, 1966: 293; plt. 51, fig. 75; text fig. 3 We are illustrating the previously designated lectotype of this species by a photograph for the first time. 11. Cypraeolina margaritula (CARPENTER, 1857b) (Plate 7, Figure 20; Text figure 2) Coan & Rotu, 1966: 294 - 295; plt. 51, fig. 77; text figs. 4, 5 A photograph of the lectotype is provided. One of a number of specimens collected in August, 1967, at Pacific Grove, Monterey County, California, where the species is abundant intertidally, is illustrated (Text figure 2). Its mantle was black, with red patches and minute spots of pale blue, and a narrow white mar- gin. The rest of the animal was translucent tan, closely spotted with pale lemon-yellow. Figure 2 Cypraeolina margaritula (CARPENTER, 1857) Living specimen, Pacific Grove, Monterey County, California. Intertidal X 14 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors wish to thank the following persons for providing data and photographs, for offering recommend- ations, and for permitting the loan of specimens used in this study: Dr. S. Stillman Berry, Dr. Eugéne Binder, Dr. Herbert T: Boschung, Dr. Kenneth J. Boss, Mr. Robert C. Bullock, Mr. S. Peter Dance, Dr. William K. Emerson, Dr. Leo G. Hertlein, Dr. John Imbrie, Sister Marion Johnson, Dr. A. Myra Keen, Dr. Jorgen Knudsen, Dr. James H. McLean, Dr. Joseph Rosewater, Dr. Donald R. Shasky, Dr. Norman Tebble, Dr. Edward C. Wilson. LITERATURE CITED CarPENTER, Puitip PEARSALL 1857a. see GouLD & CARPENTER, 1857 1857b. Catalogue of the collection of Mazatlan shells in the British Museum collected by Frederick Reigen ... London (British Museum) pp. i-iv + ix-xvi + 1-552 (June 1857) CuHEmnitz, JoHann HiEROoNyMUS 1788. | Neues systematisches Conchylien Cabinet 10. Niirnberg (G. N. Raspe) pp. [1-22] + 1-376; plts. 137 - 173 Coan, Eucene Victor & Barry RoTH 1965. A new species of Persicula from West Mexico. The Veliger 8 (2) : 67 - 69; plt. 12; 1 map (1 October 1965) 1966. |The West American Marginellidae. The Veliger 8 (4) : 276 - 299; plts. 48-51; 5 text figs. (1 April 1966) Dai, WiLt1AM HEALEY 1919. Descriptions of new species of Mollusca from the North Pacific Ocean in the collection of the United States National Museum. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 56 (2295): 293 - 371 (30 August 1919) GMELIN, JoHANN FREDERICH 1791. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae decima tertia, aucta, reformata 1 (6): 3021 - 3910. Goutp, Aucustus Appison & Puitip PEARSALL CARPENTER 1857. _ Descriptions of shells from the Gulf of California, and the Pacific coasts of Mexico and California. Part 2. Proc. Zool. Soc. London 26 [for 1856] [part 24] (313): 198-208 (7 January 1857) Editio Lipsia Hinps, Ricuarp BrinsLey 1844. Descriptions of Marginellae collected during the voyage of H. M.S. Sulphur, and from the collections of Mr. Cuming. Proc. Zool. Soc. London 14 (134) [for 1844]: 72-77 (September 1844) LaMaRcK, JEAN-BaptisTE PrerrRE ANTOINE DE MONET DE 1822. Histoire naturelle des animaux sans vertébres, 7 [Mol- lusques]. Paris (“chez l’auteur, au jardin du Roi”) pp. 1-711 (August 1822) Li, Co1n CHanc 1930. The Miocene and Recent Mollusca of Panama Bay. Bull. Geol. Soc. China 9 (3): 249-296; plts. 1-8; 1 map (October 1930) Vol. 11; No. 1 THE VELIGER Page 69 MEGERLE von MUuLrFELD, JOHANN Karu 1816. Beschreibung einiger neuen Conchylien. Gesellsch. naturforsch. Freunde Berlin: Mag. f. neuest. Entdeck. i. d. ges. Natupk. 8 (1) [article 1]: 3-11; plts. 1-2 Morcu, Otro AnprEas Lowson 1860. Beitrage zur Molluskenfauna Central-Amerikas. Malak. Blatter 7: 66-96 (July 1860); 97- 106 (Aug. 1860) Parker, Rosert H. 1964. | Zoogeography and ecology of some macro-invertebrates, particularly molluscs, in the Gulf of California and the conti- nental slope off Mexico. Vidensk. Medd. Dansk naturh. Foren 126: 1 - 178; 15 plts.; 29 text figs.; 7 tables REEvE, Lovett Aucustus 1864-1865. Conchologia iconica: or illustrations of molluscous animals 15 (Monograph of the genus Marginella) : plts. 1 - 27 plts.2-13 —- August 1864 pits. 1,14-27 + Index and Errata — January 1865 SmitH, MAaxwELu 1950. | New Mexican and Panamic shells. Nautilus 64 (2): 60-61; plt. 4 (27 October 1950) SoweErsy, GrorcE BrRETTINGHAM (157 of name) 1832. | Characters of new species of Mollusca and Conchifera collected by Mr. Cuming. Proc. Zool. Soc. London 2 [for 1832] [part 2] (17): 50-61 (5 June 1832) and (18): 104-108 (31 July 1832) SoweErsBy, GeorcE BRETTINGHAM (2%? of name) 1846. Descriptions of new species of Marginella. Proc. Zool. Soc. London 16 [for 1846] [part 14] (164): 95-97 (November 1846) Stanton, Roser J., Jr. 1966. Megafauna of the Upper Miocene Castaic Formation, Los Angeles County, California. Journ. Paleont. 40 (1): 21-40; plts. 5-7; 2 text figs. (January 1966) Tomuin, JoHN ReaD LE BRocKTON 1917. A systematic list of the Marginellidae. Proc. Malacol. Soc. London 12 (5) : 242 - 306 (22 August 1917) Page 70 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 1 On an Octopod from Placentia Bay, Newfoundland BY v FREDERICK A. ALDRICH AND Cc. GC. LU Marine Sciences Research Laboratory Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Newfoundland (Plate 8) IN CONTRAST TO THE ABUNDANCE of squid, octopods appear to be rare in Newfoundland waters. On October 28, 1967, a local fisherman obtained an octopod from water 60 fathoms deep, one mile west from Grass Island, Placentia Bay. Due to the rarity of octopods in this area, he brought the specimen to the Marine Sciences Research Laboratory on October 30, where it was turned over to the authors for study. Due to lack of proper treatment, the specimen was damaged and its surface somewhat peeled. The animal is identified as Benthoctopus piscatorum (VERRILL, 1879) (Plate 8, Figure 1). The body is globu- lar; its surface smooth and purplish brown in color. Arms are long and slender, tapering to the tips, and suckers are small. The measurements and indices are given in iablemls Benthoctopus piscatorum was first described by VER- RILL in 1879 as Octopus piscatorum. The present genus was established by Grimpe in 1921, with B. piscatorum as the type species. Specimens from fairly wide distributions, both vertical and horizontal, have been reported, i. e., Le Have Bank, Nova Scotia in 120 fathoms; Grand Bank in 200 fathoms; 39° 26’N, 70°02’ W, in 1362 fathoms (VERRILL, 1880 - 1881) ; 78° 02’ N, 9° 25’E, in 416 fath- oms (ApPELLOF, 1893); 66°41’ N, 6°59’E, in 350 fathoms (AppELLOF, 1893) ; 60° 40’ N, 4° 50’ W, in 563 fathoms (RussELL, 1909); 61° 27’ N, 1° 47’ W, in 681 fathoms (British Museum [quoted from Rosson, 1932]) ; 51° 15’ N, 11° 47’ W, in 707 - 710 fathoms (Massy, 1907); Faroe Channel in 540-608 fathoms (Hoyts, 1886). Muus (1962) postulated that this species “might be expected” in the waters of Davis Strait west of Green- land. It is the first time that this species has been reported from the inshore waters of Newfoundland. The specimen is a female, with a very large ovary, measuring 35 by 42 mm (Plate 8, Figure 2). The ovarian egg measures 18 by 6 mm. The spermathecae are globular, black and large, measuring 18 by 10mm The values quoted in Table 1 are considerably different from those presented by Rosson (1932) for Benthoctopus piscator- um. The discrepancies are undoubtedly due to the preser- vation of our specimen. The rarity of the octopod in Newfoundland waters may only be apparent and further collection by use of proper gear would increase our knowledge of the local octopodan fauna. We wish to express our appreciation to Dr. G. L. Voss of the Institute of Marine Sciences of the University of Miami for sending us specimens from his collections for purpose of comparison. — Explanation of Plate 8 Figure 1: Figure 2: Benthoctopus piscatorum (VERRILL, 1879), dorsal view of specimen from Placentia Bay, Newfoundland. Eggs (in situ) of described specimen of Benthoctopus piscatorum (VERRILL, 1879). EPR avions Vol an NO. i [ALpRicH & Lu] Plate 8 HE VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. SINddNS AYOLVHORV) NvIaYNYD Figure 1 Figure 2 Vol. 11; No. 1 THE VELIGER Page 71 Body proportions and indices of the examined specimen of Benthoctopus piscatorum (VERRILL, 1879) Table 1 (following Voss, 1956 and 1963). Body Proportions (length in mm) Web Depth: Number of gills: Indices (%) TL, ML VML MW HW AUP MWI HWI MAL WDI ALI SI SLI SWI Left 10, Right 8 362 89 58 45 31 25 12 260 203 212 179 56 52 62 45 26 50.68 34.57 34.15 23.85 71.82 5.4 28.15 12.84 LITERATURE CITED APPELLOF, A. 1893. Teuthologische Beitrage III. Bergens Mus. Aarb. No. 1 GrimpPeE, GEORG 1921. Teuthologische Mitteilungen VII. Systematische Uber- sicht der Nordseecephalopoden. Zool. Anz. 52: 296 - 304 Hoye, WiLii1AM E. 1886. Report on the Cephalopoda collected by H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873 - 76. Rept. Sci. Res. Voy. Challenger 1873-76. Zool. 16 (44): 1-245; 33 plts.; 10 figs. in text Massy, ANNE L. 1907. Preliminary notices of new and remarkable cephalo- pods from the S. W. coast of Ireland. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (Ser. 7) 20: 377 - 384 Muus, B. J. 1962. Cephalopoda. Meddelelser om Gronland 81 (5): 1 - 23 Rosson, Guy Cosurn 1932. A monograph of the Recent Cephalopoda. Part 2: The Octopoda, excluding the Octopodinae. Brit. Mus. 2: 1-359; 6 plts.; 79 text figs. RussELL, E. S. 1909. _—‘ Preliminary notice of the Cephalopoda collected by the fishery cruiser Goldseeker, 1903 - 1908. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (Ser. 8) 3: 446 - 453 VERRILL, ADDISON E. 1879. Notice of recent additions to the marine fauna of the eastern coast of North America, No. III. Amer. Journ. Sci. (Ser. 3) 17: 239 - 243 1880-1881. The cephalopods of the northeastern coast of America. Part II. The smaller cephalopods, including the “squid” and the octopi, with other allied forms. Trans. Connecticut Acad. Sci. 5: 259-446; 2 plts. Voss, GiLBerT L. 1956. A review of the cephalopods of the Gulf of Mexico. Bull. Mar. Sci. Gulf and Carib. 6 (2): 85-178; 18 figs. 1963. | Cephalopods of the Philippine Islands. U.S. Nat. Mus. Bull. 234: 1-180; 4 plts.; 36 text figs. Page 72 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 1: A New Species of Enoploteuthid Squid, Abraliopsis (Watasenia) felis, from the California Current JOHN A. McGOWAN Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California 92037 TAKASHI OKUTANI Tokai Regional Fisheries Research Laboratory, Tokyo (Plates 9 and 10; 1 Map) INTRODUCTION IN AN EXAMINATION of the extensive collection of pelagic cephalopods at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography a number of specimens of apparently undescribed spe- cies was found. One group of these specimens was so numerous and the series so complete that we have decided to describe it separately from the rest of the collection. A further reason for describing this species now is that it was discovered in a study of the distribu- tion and abundance of the larval squid of the California Current that this species ranked first in abundance (OxuTani & McGowan, in press). Including larvae, juveniles and adults, we have examined about 1850 in- dividuals of this new species. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The specimens reported on here were collected by many individuals of the staff of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography. Twenty specimens were obtained from Dr. William Pearcy of Oregon State University. Mr. Charles B. Miller made many of the measurements and Mr. Kenneth H. Isaacs sorted many of the specimens. This work was supported by the Marine Life Research Program, the Scripps Institution of Oceanography’s part of the California Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investi- gations, which are sponsored by the Marine Research Committee of the State of California and by the Nation- al Science Foundation Grant GB 2861. Abraliopsis (Watasenia) felis McGowan & OXKUTANI, spec. nov. (Plates 9 and 10) Synonyms: None. Diagnosis: An Abraliopsis with a double row of tenta- cular hooks, the ventral row of which consists of 3 or occasionally 4 large hooks and the dorsal row of 3 or occasionally 4 small hooks. The fixing apparatus on the carpus is compact and consists of 4 suckers and 7 knobs. The right ventral arm and occasionally both the right and left ventral arm of the male is hectocotylized. The hectocotylus consists of two semilunar membranes on the lateral edges of the arm just proximal to the 3 large photophores of the arm tip. These membranes are offset from one another, the inner one being more proximal than the outer. The ventral surface of the mantle with many small photophores arranged randomly but with a narrow median bare area running the entire length of the mantle. The body is elongate and fusiform with the width being less than 4, but more than 4 the length. Description: The body is muscular and firm. The mantle shape is fusiform and somewhat elongated. Based on measurements of 94 adult specimens, the width is less than + of the dorsal mantle length but more than + of the dorsal mantle length. The broadest part of the mantle is at the free margin which flares out slightly, The dorsal margin of the mantle is triangularly lobed and projects slightly at the mid-point. On the ventral side there are THE VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 1 [McGowan « Oxutani] Plate g Abraliopsis (Watasenia) felis McGowaNn & OKUTANI, 0. sp. Holotype, Male De GURL hE | Sie DEA OR a ne a cnt Seer mal yep lb ai i dam ey engi merge ym—me lis ws arcs tna mmc ele te eco “ iB f ¥ 5 ; mye Vol. 11; No. 1 THE VELIGER Page 73 slight angular projections at the position of both funnel cartilages. Between these two projections the margin is slightly concave (Plate 9). The fins are broadly sagittate with the posterior margin being slightly concave and the anterior margin somewhat convex. The width of both fins, taken together, is about 86% of the mantle length (22 adult specimens measured, see Table 1). The free margins of the fins are thinner than the remaining parts. The head is rather large and is as wide as the mantle and approximately 4 as long as the mantle length. The eye opening has a distinct sinus on the anterior edge at about the position of the third arm. There are 3 nuchal folds on either side of the head, the ventral 2 of which are semi-lunar in shape and the dorsal one somewhat squared and elongated (Plate 10, Figure 1). The central fold bears an “olfactory organ. ” The neck is constricted and distinct and has a shallow funnel excavation. The funnel is conical and short. The funnel organs consist of a dorsal V-shaped pad and two ventral oblong pads (Plate 10, Figure 3). There is a transverse fold anterior to the dorsal funnel organ. The funnel cartilages are about 3 times as long as wide and have a slightly curved but simple groove (Plate 10, Fig- ure 1). The nuchal cartilage is straight, spatulate and bi- laterally symmetrical. It is widened a little on both ends. The arms are nearly equal in length with an arm formula 4,3, 2,1 or 4, 2,3,1. The dorsal arms have a low membranous keel on the distal +. The oral face of the dorsal arms has from 12 to 17 hooks arranged in a zigzag row (Table 1, based on 12 specimens). Distal to the hooks are 10 to 18 suckers, also alternating in a zigzag row. The outer margin of the hook-bearing face of these arms has a low swimming membrane supported by nu- merous muscular filaments. The second arms are similar to the dorsals except that they tend to have a slightly greater number of hooks. The third arms have well-de- veloped aboral keels extending along the entire length of each arm. The armature is similar to that of the second but with fewer distal suckers and somewhat fewer hooks (Plate 10, Figure 7). The ventral arms have aboral keels their entire length. They have from 7 to 14 hooks in a zigzag row but no distal suckers. Generally the right vent- ral arm is hectocotylized but in an examination of 39 males, 2 of them had both the right and the left ventral arms hectocotylized. The hectocotylus is a pair of semi- Table 1 Measurements of Types Holotype Total length (including tentacle) 84.8 mm Mantle length, mm 36.7 Mantle width, mm 10.6 Fin length at attachment, mm 20.5 Width across the fins, mm 26.2 Width of the head (inter-ocular 10.6 length), mm Head length (from anterior end 12.7 of nuchal cartilage to the prox- imal end of the dorsal arms), mm Eye (transverse length X longi- 5.5 X 5.5 tudinal length of eye opening), mm Dorsal arm: Right 18.9 length, mm Left 18.1 Second arm: Right 20.9 length, mm Left 20.2 Third arm: Right 19.2 length, mm Left 19.3 Ventral arm: Right 21.5 length, mm Left 21.8 Tentacle: Right 37.0 length, mm Left 32.2 Paratype 1 Paratype 2 Paratype 3 (= Allotype) 105.5 - 80.0 417 33.5 39.2 12.4 10.2 11.8 25.0 16.0 21.6 33.8 26.1 29.8 11.1 11.5 9.5 11.0 10.1 12.0 5.9 X 4.5 4.1 X 3.3 4.3 X 3.5 17.8 12.5 18.0 18.5 13.0 16.0 21.8 15.8 21.0 21.8 14.2 20.2 22.8 16.6 = 22.4 15.0 - 27.0 - 24.0 27.0 - 21.0 42.7 - 345 41.0 - = Page 74 lunar membranes offset from one another with the inner membrane being somewhat more distal than the outer (Plate 10, Figures 6, 6a, 6b). Between these crests is a deep groove. The tentacle is as long as the mantle and has a gradu- ally tapered stem which is flattened on the oral surface. The club (or manus) is not expanded and occupies */« to */; of the tentacle length. There is no membrane on the outer side of the club. The armature of the proximal portion of the club consists primarily of hooks arranged in two rows. In the ventral row there are 3 or occasionally 4 large hooks and muscular pads are sometimes present between these. The dorsal row consists of 3 and occasion- ally 4 small hooks which are usually about half the size of the large hooks (Plate 10, Figures 5a and 5b). There are very small suckers and sometimes pads between these hooks. The distal part of the club has 13 transverse rows of 4 suckers each. The horny rings of these suckers have 5 to 6 rather blunt teeth on the margin (Plate 10, Fig- ure 5a). The carpus bears a fixing apparatus which con- sists of 4 suckers arranged in a quadrate and 6 to 7 small papillae or knobs (Plate 10, Figure 5). The mantle has many photophores, particularly on its ventral surface. These range in size from 150 to 250u. There is an almost random arrangement of these, but a narrow longitudinal strip without photophores exists on the mid-ventrum. The funnel has about 60 photo- phores, particularly on the ventral side, but also on the dorsum. The ventral surface of the head also has photo- phores on its integument, but these are arranged in no consistent order except about 28 surrounding the peri- phery of the eyes (Plate 9). The eyeball has 2 large (600) and 3 small (400) photophores along the vent ral periphery. The third arms have a row of 9 to 11 photophores on the ventral surface. The ventral arms bear 3 rows of photophores of which the dorsal-most consists of 5 small ones on the keel. The other 2 rows are along both edges of the aboral surface (Plate 9). Very near the distal tip of the ventral arms are 3 very large ellipsoid luminous organs about 0.8mm in length (Plate THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 1 10, Figure 6). Distal to these are 4 small photophores. These large luminous organs are a characteristic feature of the genus. The buccal membrane has 8 supporting muscles and its inner surface is heavily papillated (Plate 10, Figure 2). The radula is quite delicate and has 7 unicuspid rha- chidian teeth in a row and no accessory plates (Plate 10, Figure 4). The gladius is penniform with a maximum width about $ of the length. The rhachis has a sharp keel which appears as a dark streak on the dorsum of the mantle. The spermatophores are about 5.5mm in length and 0.16mm wide. The sperm cord is thick and occupies about 3 of the length. The distal portion of this is opaque and without structure, posterior to this it coils 2$ to 3 times and continues to a striated portion (Plate 10, Figure 8). Types: Holotype (male): Station 87.90 of CalCOFI Cruise 25 (31°59’N, 122°24’W), May 1951. Paratype No. 1 (female): (32°39.3’N, 117°37.2’ W), August, 1953. Paratype No. 2 (male): (32°49’N, 117°43’W), August 1953. Paratype No. 3 (male): St. 93.90 of CalCOFI Cruise 5704 (30°49.5'N. 121°32’W), April 1957. Deposition of Types: Holotype: U.S. National Museum, one male, USN M 678792 Paratype 1: U.S. National Museum, one female, US NM 678793 Paratype 2: California Acad. Sci. Dept. Invert. Zool., one male, CAL Acad. Invert. Type Coll. No. 310 Paratype 3: Scripps Institution of Oceanography, Marine Invertebrate Collections, one male. DISCUSSION There are at least 3 other species of the genus in the North Pacific. As is frequently the case with oceanic in- vertebrates, which are difficult to collect, many of the Explanation of Plate 10 Abraliopsis (Watasenia) felis McGowan & OKUTANI, Nn. sp. Figure 1: Latero-ventral view of the cephalic part (Paratype No. 3, male) showing funnel cartilage, olfactory lobe, nuchal folds and the funnel adductors. The photophores on the eyeball are shown by removing a part of the eye lid. The photophores on the integu- ment are not drawn. Figure 2: Buccal membrane (Paratype No. 3). Ventro-anterior view. Figure 3: Funnel organ (Paratype No. 3). The funnel is cut open. Figure 4: Three transverse rows of the radula (Paratype No. 3). Figure 5: Club and carpus of the tentacle (Holotype). Figure 5a: A large sucker of the tentacle (Paratype No. 3). Figure 5b: A large hook of the tentacle (Paratype No. 3). Figure 6: Right ventral arm of the male (Paratype No.2). Figure 6a: The distal tip of the right hectocotylized arm (Holotype). Figure 6b: The distal tip of the left hectocotylized arm (Holotype). Figure 7: Left third lateral arm (Holotype). Figure 8: A spermatophore taken from the spermatophore sac (Paratype No. 3). THE VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 1 [McGowan & Oxutanl] Plate 10 ge abs beetle wnt Vol. 11; No. 1 THE VELIGER Page 75 descriptions and reports of these species are confusing and contradictory because they are based on immature or damaged specimens. Further, the problem of discrim- inating between these species is difficult because the authors did not report the ranges over which important meristic, taxonomic characters varied. It has been neces- sary, therefore, to re-examine these and other characters of two closely “related” species, Abraliopsis (Watasenia) scintillans BERRY, 1911 and Abraliopsis affinis (PFEFFER, 1912). The former is closely related to our new species in a morphological sense and the latter has a contiguous and occasionally overlapping geographical distribution. Abraliopsis scintillans from Japanese waters was de- scribed by Berry in 1911 and 1912. However, earlier WatasE (1905) had reported a new species of the genus from Japan but did not describe it. IsHrkawa (1913) in reviewing the characteristics of this species decided that Berry’s and Watase’s squids were identical and created the new genus Watasenia (= Watasea IsHtKawa, 1913) for it. This was done on the basis that Berry’s A. scintillans had only 2 large tentacular hooks instead of the 3 large and 3 small ones of A. morisii (VERANY, 1837) or 5 large and 5 small ones of A. pfefferi Jounin, 1896. A further distinction of the new genus was based on the fact that the right ventral arm was hectocotylized with 2 small semi-lunar membranes near the tip. This, according to ISHIKAWA, set it off from A. morisii and presumably other members of the genus because Coun (1910) after synonymizing most other species of the genus with A. morisi illustrates a spectacularly enlarged swimming web (or “Schutzsaum’’) on the left ventral arm which he calls the hectocotylus (plt. 6, fig. 1 and plt. 10, fig. 1). How- ever, in at least one of the species he synonymized (namely A. hoylei of Hoye, 1904, which Prerrer, 1912 described as a new species, A. affinis, see below) this large swimming web is not the hectocotylus. The hectocotylus of A. hoylei (of Hoye, 1904, not of Prerrer, 1884 or 1912 but rather = A. affinis Prerrer, 1912) is on the right ventral arm and is somewhat similar to those of A. scintillans Berry, 1911 and A. felis, spec. nov. Further, Voss (1960) mentions having a specimen of A. morisii with the right ventral arm hectocotylized. The type of hectocotylization is not mentioned. Therefore one of the two characters IsHiKAwa uses to distinguish his new genus Watasenia is common in the genus Abraliopsis and cannot be used to set off Watasenia uniquely. The other character used by him, the presence of only 2 hooks on the tentacle club rather than the 6 to 10 found in the other members of the genus seems to us to be insufficient for the creation of a new genus. At best, Watasenia can be considered only a subgenus of Abraliopsis JousIN, 1896. We so consider it here. The differences between Abraliopsis scintillans and A. felis are listed in Table 1. It is evident that A. felis has a different body shape and mantle length to fin width ratio. It has more hooks on the manus of the tentacles and the fixing apparatus of the tentacle carpus differs. The ventral mantle photophores are arranged somewhat differently and the arms have, generally, more hooks but fewer distal suckers than in A. scintillans. Most of the differences between these species are quantitative rather than qualitative; however, they are consistent and significant and may be used for a rather easy visual separation of specimens. It is obvious that the two species are Closely related and should be considered members of the subgenus Watasenia. South of the area occupied by Abraliopsis felis a second species of the genus, A. affinis (PFEFFER, 1912), is found in abundance (see Map). The first report of the presence of this species in the eastern tropical Pacific was that of Hoye in 1904 who illustrated it and identified it as Abraliopsis hoyle: Jounin, 1896 (= Enoploteuthis hoylei Prerrer, 1884). However, PFEFFER (1912), without ap- parently seeing any specimens and using Hoy te’s descrip- tion and figures as a basis, claimed that Hoy.e’s speci- mens were not the A. hoyle: that he had described in 1884, but rather a new species, Abralia (= Abraliopsis) affinis, which he proceeded to describe. PFEFFER further re-described his A. hoyle: in more detail and it is clear that Hoy e’s specimens do not fit this description. In spite of this, Rosson (1948) reports that 8 specimens (one male) were collected in the vicinity of the Galapagos and Cocos Islands by the Arcturus Expedition. Rosson chose to call these specimens A. hoylei PFEFFER. But he did not illustrate the specimens, gave no counts of meris- tic characters and apparently has confused the swimming web of the left ventral arm with the hectocotylus. Fur- ther, his single male specimen was “damaged” and “not very well preserved” (op. cit., p. 118). It would seem, therefore, that Abraliopsis affinis (PFEFFER, 1912) must be considered a valid species. We have in our collection at Scripps Institution of Oceanography several hundred specimens of an Abrali- opsis species from the eastern tropical Pacific that fit both Hoy.e’s (1904) illustrations of “A. hoyle’ and PreFFER’s (1912) description of A. affinis very well. There is no doubt that they are the A. affinis of PFEFFER, 1912, but because his original descriptions are incomp- lete, additional details need to be added. For example, the left ventral arm is as Hoye shows it and resembles strongly the left ventral arm of A. morisu as figured by Cuun (1910) ; that is, with a greatly enlarged swimming web. Cuun called this swimming web “the hectocotylus.” While this is a good secondary sexual characteristic, being No. 1 ° ’ Vol. 11 THE VELIGER Page 76 Character Tentacle armature Fixing apparatus Hectocotylus Ventral mantle photophores Arms, hooks Arms distal suckers Body shape Mantle length (mm) Fin width (mm) Mantle length (mm) Volume cm® Eye ball photophores Geographic range _———————— ee ee a a a el a a ee ee See ee Abraliopsis felis, n. sp. Table 2 A Comparison of Several Species Abraliopsis scintillans BERRY 3, or occasionally 4 large hooks 2 large hooks and no small and 3 or occasionally 4 small hooks in a double row. No membrane on club. 4 suckers and 7 knobs, compact. Right or occasionally left and right ventral arms. Two small semilunar crests, offset. A “random” arrangement but with a narrow median bare area entire length of mantle. Ist L. range = 15-17, * 16 ist R. range = 12-17, x 15.4 2° L. range = 16-18, x 17 2” R. range = 16-19, x 17.4 3P0L. range = 15-18, x 15.9 322 R. range = 13-17, x 16 4m]. range = 10-14, x 11.8 4m R.range = 7-14, x 114 Ist L. range = 13-18, x 15 Is™R. range = 10-18, x 13 2° L, range = 13-18, x 15 2° R. range = 12-20, x 16 3 L. range = 4-18, x 12.3 3) R.range = 6-18, x 12.1 Elongate, fusiform Width <4 length Range = 1.0-1.3 3 x = 1.11 Range = 0.74 - 3.66 x = 1.28 2 large 3 small California Current hooks. Club with semilunar membrane on outer side. 3 or 4 suckers and 3 knobs, somewhat diffuse. Right ventral arm. Two small semilunar crests, offset. An almost even arrangement with median bare area entire length of mantle. 1st L. range = 9 -12, x 10.8 1s™R. range = 8-12, x 10.5 2xo L. range = 11 - 14, x 13.1 2° R. range = 11-14, x 12.7 38> L. range = 10- 14, x 12.2 32 R. range = 12-13, x 12.5 4m™L.range = 9-11, x 10.2 4m R. range = 9-12, x 10.4 1st L. range = 26 - 34, x 29 1s*R. range = 26 - 34, x 29 2x L. range = 27 - 31, x 28 2 R. range = 28 - 34, x 31 38> L. range = 24 - 34, x 28.6 3" R. range = 28 - 34, x 29.5 Elongate, fusiform Width <3 length. Range = 1.2- 1.4 x = 1.28 Range = 0.57 - 0.86 x = 0.67 2 large 3 small Coastal waters of Japan, Korea and Okhotsk Sea Abraliopsis affinis (PFEFFER, 1912) ' 3 large and 4 small hooks in a double row. Club with semi- lunar membrane on outer side. 3 to 5 suckers and knobs, compact. Right ventral arm with 3 small semilunar crests, offset. Left ventral arm with greatly enlarged swimming web 3 X width of arm. Arranged in longitudinal rows with wide median bare area terminating on distal 4 of mantle in bare circular patch. 1s L. range = 14 - 25, x 18.2 ISR. range = 15-27, x 19 2x? LL. range = 16 - 26, x 20.6 2x? R. range = 16 - 26, x 20.4 3° L. range = 16 - 24, x 19.8 3°? R. range = 13 - 24, x 19.7 4m]. range = 14-47, x 31 4™ R, range = 17 - 40, x 24 1s L. range = 10 - 24, x 16 IR. range = 8-22, x 15 2° L. range = 6-26, x 11 2° R. range = 3-20, x 11 372L. range = 6-14,x 98 3P°R. range = 7-14, x 10.8 Short, semifusiform Width <4 length Range = 0.96 - 1.1 x = 0.98 Range = 0.90 - 2.8 x = 1.50 2 large 3 small Eastern tropical Pacific Abraliopsis hoylet (PFEFFER, 1884) * 4 large and 4 small hooks in a double row. 4 or 5 suckers and 7 knobs. Not described. Somewhat irregularly arranged but tend to be in longitudinal rows. Narrow median bare area on posterior % of mantle. 1* 20 xv 19-21 3 19-21 4™ 19.91 “97 distal to hooked area” “Short semifusiform” Width <4 length 0.91, single specimen 1 large 4 small A single specimen, “presumably from the Mascarenes,” Indian Ocean. Vol. 11; No. 1 THE VELIGER Page 77 found only in the males, it is not the hectocotylus. The right ventral arm of this species is hectocotylized just as is the right ventral arm of A. scintillans and A. felis. This hectocotylization (in A. affinis) takes the form of 3 small semilunar membranes near the tip of the right ventral arm just posterior to the 3 large swellings that contain the light organs. These membranes are offset from one another, 2 of them are on the inner and 1 on the outer lateral edges of the oral surface of the arm. The most proximal of these is somewhat larger than the other 2. It may be seen in Table 1 that the number of hooks on this arm is fewer than on the left ventral arm. The females of A. affinis do not, of course, have a hecto- cotylus nor do they possess the greatly enlarged swimming web. The web of the left ventral arm of the female is similar to the male’s but very much smaller, being only about $ as wide as the arm width. That the specimens examined were, as a matter of fact, females of A. affinis was determined by examining them for the presence of ovaries and by comparing the other taxonomic charac- to those of the male. A particularly useful character for this purpose is the arrangement of the ventral mantle photophores. These ventral mantle photophores were illustrated well by Hoyte (1904, plt. 10, fig. 1), but he did not discuss the uniqueness of their arrangement nor did PFEFFER in his description of A. affinis. In the more than 100 specimens examined by us, both the males and females of this species have rather indistinct longitudinal rows of photophores on their ventral mantle surface but with a very broad medial area lacking such photophores. This bare area begins at the anterior edge of the mantle and terminates on the distal 4 of the mantle in a bare, circu- lar patch somewhat greater in diameter than the width of the medial bare area. A fourth species of this genus is present in our collec- tions from the waters off southern Baja California. It resembles greatly CHuN’s (1910) description and illus- trations (particularly plt. X, fig. 1) of Abraliopsis morisu (VerRANyY, 1837). We cannot, however, formally identify it as such because the hectocotylus of our specimens is similar to that of A. scintillans, A. affinis and A. felis, <— Explanation to Table 2 1 This is based primarily on an examination of 136 specimens in our collections. The data presented here do not disagree with PFEFFER’s description but merely enlarge upon it. 2 Based entirely on Prerrer, 1912. 3 It is obvious that the range over which this character varies overlaps that of A. scintillans; however, by the Mann-Whitney “U” test the differences between the means for the two species is significant, p < 0.001 (Tate « CLELLAND, 1959, p. 89). that is, small semilunar membranes near the tip of the right ventral arm. The left ventral arm of these Baja California specimens have the enlarged swimming web as illustrated by Coun in A. morisii and which he called the hectocotylus. Until the Atlantic and Indian Ocean species of this genus (A. morisii, A. pfefferi and A. hoylei) are re-examined and the nature of the hectocotylization of the ventral arms clarified, no further discussion of this fourth North Pacific species seems warranted. Natural History: The identifying characteristics, distri- bution and abundance of the larvae and juveniles of Abraliopsis felis spec. nov. have been studied (OKUTANI & McGowan, in press). The larvae of this species were found to be the most abundant ones in the California Current. They are more than five times as numerous as the larvae of Loligo opalescens Berry, 1911. Seasonal studies on the occurrence of the larvae show them to be both most abundant and most frequent during the months of June and July and although some larvae are found all year, this probably indicates that the peak spawning ac- tivity is in the early summer. They are more abundant offshore (i.e., greater than 50 nautical miles from the coast) than inshore and more abundant in the central sector of the California Current (i.e., between Point Conception [34°30’N], California and Punta Eugenia [27°51’N], Baja California, Mexico). Based on an ex- amination of 91 adult specimens the male to female ratio male female ue: Thus far this species has been found only in the Cali- fornia Current (see Map). LITERATURE CITED Berry, SAMUEL STILLMAN 1911. Note on a new Abraliopsis from Japan (A. scintillans, n. sp.) Nautilus 25: 93 - 94 1912. A catalogue of Japanese Cephalopoda. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 64: 380 - 444; 4 figs.; 5 plts. Cuun, Cari 1910. | Die Cephalopoden. I. Teil: Oegopsida. Wissen- schaftl. Ergebn. deutsch. Tiefsee-Exp. Valdivia, 18: 1-402; 32 figs.; 61 plts. Hoye, WILLIAM Evans 1904. Reports on the scientific results of the expedition to the eastern tropical Pacific Albatross V. Reports on the Cephalopoda. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard 43 (1): legis iO) jks Isuikawa, C. 1913. | Einige Bemerkungen iiber den leuchtenden Tintenfisch, Watasenia n. gen., (Abraliopsis der Autoren) scintillans Brrry, aus Japan. Zool. Anz. 43: 162 - 172 Page 78 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 1 130° 120° 110° 100° SOg 80° 70° Abraliopsis felis © Abraliopsis affinis oO 40° 30° 20° 10° 02 20° FROM HO CHART 1500 130° (20° 110° 100° SO 80° 70° Localities at which specimens of Abraliopsis felis and A. affinis have been collected. The solid circles indicate A. felis, the open circles A. affinis. Vol. 11; No. 1 THE VELIGER Page 79 Jounin, Louts 1896. Observations sur divers céphalopodes. Abraliopsis pfef- fert (nov. gen. et nov. spec.) Bull. Soc. scient. et méd. Ouert 5: 19-35 OxuTANI, TAKASHI & JoHN A. McGowan In press. Systematics, distribution and abundance of plank- tonic decapod (Cephalopoda) larvae from the California Current, April 1954- March 1957. Bull. Scripps Inst. Oceanogr. PFEFFER, GEorG J. 1884. Die Cephalopoden des Hamburger Naturhistorischen Museums. Abhandl. Naturw. Ver. Hamburg 8: 1 - 30 1912. Die Cephalopoden der Plankton-Expedition. Ergebn. Plankton-Exped.. Humboldt-Stift. 2: 1-815; 48 plts. Rosson, Guy Cosurn 1948. The Cephalopoda Decapoda of the Arcturus Oceano- graphic Expedition, 1925. Zoologica 33 (3): 115 - 132 Sasaki, MapoKa 1929. A monograph of the dibranchiate cephalopods of the Japanese and adjacent waters. Journ. Coll. Agr. Hokka- ido Imp. Univ. 20: 1 - 357; 158 figs.; 30 plts. Tate, M. W.& R. C. CLELLAND 1957. Non parametric and shortcut statistics. Interst. Printers & Publ., Danville, Ill. VERANY, J. B. 1837. | Mémoire sur six nouvelles espéces des céphalopodes trouvée dans le Méditerranée 4 Nice. Mem. Acad. Sci. Torino, Ser. 2, 1: 91 - 98 Voss, GILBERT L. 1960. Bermudan cephalopods. to 446 WaTASE, S. 1905. Hotaru-ika no Hakkoki (“On the luminous organs of the firefly squid’). Dobutu-Gaku-Zassi. 17: 119 - 123 Fieldiana, Zool. 39: 419 Page 80 NOTES & NEWS Tellina ulloana A New Species from Magdalena Bay, Baja California, Mexico BY LEO G. HERTLEIN Tellina declivis SowERBy, 1868 (species 261, plt. 44, fig. 261) was described without information as to the locality from which it came. Tellina declivis ConraD, 1834 (p. 131) was described from the late Tertiary of Yorktown, Virginia. This made necessary a new name for T. declivis Sowersy. Datt (1900, p. 301) on the basis of the orig- inal figure, judged the form to be a West American species, and in this he has been followed by other authors. We proposed a replacement name for the homonym as Tellina (Merisca) proclivis HERTLEIN & StRoNG (1949, p. 83; plt. 1, figs. 6, 7, 14), with an illustration of a West American specimen. Recently Dr. Kenneth J. Boss examined Sowerby’s holotype and found that it is not a West American form. An illustration of that specimen shown to me recently by Eugene Coan bears out Boss’ observation. Under the International Code of Zoological Nomen- clature (Art. 72d), the replacement name applies to Sowerby’s species and not to the West American form that had been erroneously identified as Tellina declivis. Therefore, Tellina ulloana HERTLEIN is here proposed as a new species, based upon type specimen 9226 (Calif. Acad. Sci. Dept. Geol. Type Coll.) , from Magdalena Bay, Baja California, with the description, illustrations and other details as given by HERTLEIN & StronG for T: pro- clivis. This species has been reported as ranging south to Panama. Both Boss and Coan called my attention to the similar- ity between the West American species here described as Tellina ulloana and the Caribbean species T: martinicensis D’Orpicny, 1842 (see WaRMKE & AssorT, 1961, p. 196; plt. 40, fig. i). Dr. Boss informed me (written communication Octo- ber 20, 1967) that the type specimen of Tellina declivis (T: prochvis) appears to be macomoid, perhaps from the Caribbean but possibly elsewhere. LyncE (1909, p. 193) cited “Tellina (Arcopagia?) declivis SowErBy” from the Gulf of Thailand (Gulf of Siam) and from Singapore THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 1 and stated, “My specimens exactly agree with SowERBY’s description and figure.” This species is named for Francisco de Ulloa, the first navigator to reach the head of the Gulf of California in September, 1539. LITERATURE CITED Conrap, TimoTHy ABBOTT 1834. | Observations on the Tertiary and more recent forma- tions of a portion of the southern states. App. Descriptions of new Tertiary fossils from the southern states (pp. 130 - 157). Journ. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 7(1): 116-157 (post September, according to Sherborn) Dai, WILLIAM HEALEY 1900. Synopsis of the family Tellinidae and of the North American species. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., 23 (1210): 285 to 326; plts. 2 - 4 (14 November 1900) HErRTLEIN, LEo GeorcE & ARCHIBALD McCLurRE STRONG 1949. Eastern Pacific expeditions of the New York Zoolog- ical Society. XL. Mollusks from the west coast of Mexico and Central America. Part 7. Zoologica 34 (2): 63 - 97; 1 plt. (10 August 1949) Lynce, H. 1909. The Danish Expedition to Siam 1899-1900. IV. Ma- rine Lamellibranchiata. Kongl. Danske Vidensk. Selsk. Skrift., Raekke 7, Naturvidensk. Mathem. Afd. 3: 97 - 299; pits. 1-5; 1 map SOWERBY, GEORGE BRETTINGHAM (2%? of name) 1866 - 1869. Conchologia Iconica; or, illustrations of the shells of molluscous animals (London), vol. 17: Teéllina, plts. 1-58 with expl. (July 1866 - April 1869) WarMKE, GERMAINE L. & RoBERT TUCKER ABBOTT 1961. | Caribbean seashells. Livingston Publ. Co., Nar- berth, Pennsylv. pp. i- x, 1 - 346; plts. 1-44; maps 1-19; 34 text figs. AN EMENDATION BY CRAWFORD N. CATE 12719 San Vicente Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90049 It has come to my attention that a recent paper on West Australian cowries (CaTE, 1968) contains some inaccu- racies and errors which I wish to correct. They are as follows: Entry 18, p. 227: Cypraea (Lyncina) leviathan gedlingae Cate, 1968. — The diagnosis of this new subspecies was omitted. The shell of C. (L.) leviathan gedlingae differs from that of C. (L.) I. leviathan ScHILDER & SCHILDER, Vol. 11; No. 1 1937 by being narrower, more cylindrical, less pyriform; more thickly, more solidly formed; by apparently being a smaller form (it will require additional live collected ma- terial to determine this) ; and by apparently being geo- graphically isolated from the presently known range of the nominate subspecies. Since publication of the above mentioned article another specimen of C. (L.) I. ged- lingae has been received; it was collected by Molly Ged- ling in 1962 on the beach just S of Vlaming Head Light, North West Cape. Entry 19, p. 227: The data should read as follows: (Go 12/3) 10/07 30) 25) Entry 32, pp. 220 and 228; The designations for the species in the text and on plate 29, fig.42 are incorrect. They should be corrected to read: Erosaria (Erosaria) lamarcku lamarckit (Gray, 1825). For the reference on p. 220 read : Zool. Journ. 1: 506 Entry 37, p. 29: The data should read as follows: POR ION 8:5 199 17) Entry 61, p. 232: The assertion is made that the “species is clearly separable from Bistolida s. stolida because of the total absence of lateral marks at each quarter of the shell.” Bistolida brevidentata does possess lateral marks on the angle of the shell margins; however, what I in- tended to convey is that these markings do not normally become broader, extending up the sides of the shell, often coming into direct contact with the large central, chest- nut-brown color blotch as in B. s. stolida. This particular shell pattern is almost never seen in B. brevidentata. The indications of magnification for figs. 26 (plate 26) and 33 (plate 27) should be corrected to x 13. LITERATURE CITED Cate, Crawrorp NEILL 1968. | West Australian cowries. — a second, revised, and ex- panded report. The Veliger 10 (3) : 212 - 232; plts. 21 - 34; 5 maps. (1 January 1968) CORRECTION OF AN OMISSION The title of the paper by Dr. E. C. Haderlie, starting on page 327 of our April 1968 issue should read the same as in the Table of Contents, i. e. Marine Fouling and Boring Organisms in Monterey Harbor. The two words “and Boring” were omitted quite acci- dentally; in citing the work these two words should, of course, be included. Your Editor apologizes for this very regrettable oversight on his part. THE VELIGER Page 81 Moving? If your address is changed it will be important to notify us of the new address at least six weeks before the effective date, and not less than six weeks before our regular mailing dates. Because of a number of drastic changes in the regulations affecting second class mailing, there is now a sizeable charge to us on the returned copies as well as for our remailing to the new address. We are forced to ask our members and subscribers for reimbursement of these charges; further, because of increased costs in connection with the new mailing plate, we also must ask for reimbursement of that expense. Effective January 8, 1968 the following charges must be made: change of address — $1.- change of address and re-mailing of a returned issue — $2.-. We must emphasize that these charges cover only our actual expenses and do not include compensation for the extra work involved in re-packing and _ re-mailing returned copies. Important Notices Because of the changed rules affecting second class mail matter, we will no longer be able to include the customary reminders in our January issue, nor can we attach any flyers to our journal henceforth. We shall, from now on, print a statement when dues-renewal time has arrived or announcements regarding special publi- cations in our Notes & News column. Manuscripts received up to February 14 each year will be considered for publication in our July issue; May 14 is the deadline for the October issue, August 14 for the January issue and November 14 for the April issue. For very short papers of less than 500 words (including title, etc.) the deadlines are one month later than those given above, provided that these short notes are impor- Page 82 tant enough to warrant preferential treatment. It is, how- ever, understood that submission of a manuscript before the dates indicated is not a guarantee of acceptance. On May 15, 1968 we published the second part of the supplement to Volume 3 and mailed it to those of our members and subscribers who, according to our records, had purchased Part 1 before December 31, 1964. Part 2 will be available at $3.- plus a handling charge of $-.35 (plus sales tax, for California residents). The complete supplement is available at $6.- plus a handling charge of $-.45 (plus, again, the sales tax for California residents). We deplore the long delay in the publication of Part 2 as it is our policy to publish as promptly as is technically feasible. But unusual and completely unpredictable cir- cumstances over which we had absolutely not the slightest control are responsible. We also regret that the delay may have inconvenienced some of our readers who had given up hope of ever seeing Part 2 in print and therefore had their journal bound. To these readers we extend our apologies. We are pleased to announce the publication on July 15, 1968 of a Supplement to Volume 11, entitled: The Biology of Acmaea edited by D. P Abbott, D. Epel, I. A. Abbott and R. Stohler. This supplement is a group of 20 papers dealing with various aspects of the biology of several different species of limpets. It comprises 112 pages, 7 halftone plates and numerous text figures, charts and tables. This supplement, like all our supplements, will be sold on separate order only. The price is $5.- plus a handling charge of $0.35; however, members in good standing are granted a discount of 20% on the sales price provided remittance for the correct amount is received before June 30, 1969. No discount can be granted after that date. California residents must add the appropriate amount of sales tax. — CauiroRNIA MALAcOzooLocicaL Society, Inc. announces: Backnumbers of THE VELIGER and other publications Volume 9: $22.- Volume 10: $24.- Volumes 1 through 8: out of print THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 1 Supplement to Volume 3: $6.-* plus $-.35 handling charge [Part 1: Opisthobranch Mollusks of California by Prof. Ernst Marcus; ; Part 2: The Anaspidea of California by Prof. R. Beeman and The Thecosomata and Gymnosomata of the Cali- fornia Current by Prof. John A. McGowan] [The two parts are available separately at $3.- each plus a handling charge of $-.35 or as indicated above. If purchased separately, each part is subject to the Califor- nia State sales tax if mailed to California addresses. | Supplement to Volume 6: $4.-* plus $-.35 mailing charge [Biology of Tegula funebralis (A. ApAMs), edited by Abbott, Blinks, Phillips and Stohler] Supplement to Volume 7: $2.-* plus $-.35 mailing charge [Glossary of A Thousand-and-One Terms used in Conchology, compiled by W1n1FrEp H. Arno.p] Items marked with * are subject to sales tax in the State of California; residents of that State please add the appropriate amount to their remittances. Prices subject to change without notice. Send orders with remittance to: Mrs. Jean M. Cate, Manager, 12719 San Vicente Boule- vard, Los Angeles, Calif. 90049. Please, make checks payable to C. M.S., Inc. Shipments of material ordered are generally made within two weeks after receipt of remittance. Backnumbers of the current volume will be mailed to new subscribers, as well as to those who renew late, on the first working day of the month following receipt of the remittance. The same policy applies to new members. Subscription to Volume 11: $18.- domestic; $18.80 in Canada, Mexico, Central and South America; $19.20 all other foreign coutries. Affiliate Membership in the C. M.S., Inc. is $6.- for the fiscal year July 1, 1967 to June 30, 1968. Postage for members living in Canada, Mexico, Central and South America 80 cents, for members living in any other foreign country $1.20 additional. Membership open to indi- viduals only - no institutional memberships. Please, send for membership application forms to the Manager or the Editor. At a Regular Membership Meeting of the CattrorNiA MatacozootocicaL Society, Inc. the following policies were adopted by unanimous vote: Vol. 11; No. 1 There will be an initiation fee of $2.- (in addition to the annual dues) for persons joining the Society on or after January 1, 1967. Members receive The Veliger free of further charges and are entitled to purchase one copy of any supplement pub- lished during the current membership year at a special discount (to be determined for each supplement). Membership renewals are due on or before April 15 each year. If renewal payments are made after April 15 but before March 15 of the following year, there will be a re-instatement fee of $1.-. Members whose dues pay- ments (including the re-instatement fee) have not been received by the latter date, will be dropped from the rolls of the Society. They may rejoin by paying a new initiation fee. The volume(s) published during the time a member was in arrears may be purchased, if still available, at the regular full volume price plus applicable handling charges. CALIFORNIA MALACOZOOLOGICAL Society, Inc. is a non-profit educational corporation (Articles of In- corporation No. 463389 were filed January 6, 1964 in the office of the Secretary of State). The Society publishes a scientific quarterly, the VELIGER. Donations to the Society are used to pay a part of the production costs and thus to keep the subscription rate at a minimum. Donors may designate the Fund to which their contribution is to be credited: Operating Fund (available for current production) ; Savings Fund (available only for specified purposes, such as publication of especially long and signi- ficant papers); Endowment Fund (the income from which is available. The principal is irrevocably dedicated to scientific and educational purposes). Unassigned dona- tions will be used according to greatest need. Contributions to the C.M.S., Inc. are deductible by donors as provided in section 170 of the Internal Revenue Code (for Federal income tax purposes). Bequests, lega- cies, gifts, devices are deductible for Federal estate and gift tax purposes under section 2055, 2106, and 2522 of the Code. The Treasurer of the C. M. S., Inc. will issue suitable receipts which may be used by Donors to substan- tiate their respective tax deductions. THE VELIGER Page 83 BOOKS, PERIODICALS, PAMPHLETS Marine Botany: An Introduction by E. Yate Dawson. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc. New York. 1966. pp. xii+371; illust. $10.95 The malacologist will find this a useful reference work if for no other reason than that it aids in the recognition of the seaweeds among which mollusks occur. It is more than an identification manual, however, for there are chapters on the marine environment, bacteria, fungi, phytoplankton, the several groups of algae, their mor- phology, physiology, ecology and distribution. The three final chapters are on the history of the study of seaweeds, utilization of marine algae, and collecting procedures. Two appendices bring together several lists of useful information, such as the research facilities of the United States where marine collections are housed. We may be glad that Yale Dawson was able to see this book into print before his tragic drowning. It is a book that one can read without feeling bogged-down by special terminology, yet the technical terminology is there when needed. Numerous line drawings and halftone pictures are well chosen as illustrations. MK VENUS The Japanese Journal of Malacology Vol. 25, nos. 3 and 4, July 1967. | Some papers from the Eleventh Pacific Science Congress, Tokyo, 1966 Indo-Pacific faunal elements in the Tropical Eastern Pa- cific, with special reference to the mollusks. — WiLuiaM K. EMERSON The composition and relationships of marine molluscan fauna of the Hawaiian Islands. — E. ALison Kay Cenozoic history of Indo-Pacific and other warm-water elements in the marine Mollusca of New Zealand. —- CuHar_es A. FLEMING Mass production of molluscs by means of rearing larvae in tanks. — Takeo IMAI Cytological relationships of some Pacific Gastropods. - J. B. Burcu Characteristics and origin of archibenthal molluscan fauna on the Pacific Coast of Honshu, Japan. — T. OKUTANI MK Page 84 Natural History of Marine Animals. by G. E. MacGinitie and Nettie MacGiniriz. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1968. pp. xii + 523; frontisp. + 286 figs. in text (line drawing and halftone illustrations) . Second Edition. The authors are well-known naturalists who have de- voted together more than one human life span to the loving study of the marine animals. It seems almost superfluous to say anything about this second edition, at least as far as the many users of the first edition are con- cerned, except, perhaps, to mention that various portions of the book have been rewritten to include the results of more recent findings. However, as is the earlier edition, so is this one eminently readable, though there is no avoiding of technical terminology where needed. As the authors have intended, the book is useful to a beginning nature-lover as well as to the teacher of marine biology. In these days when molecular biology is the vogue - we almost said, the fashion - it is good to see a book again that deals with the entire living organism in its many facets. It is unnecessary to enumerate the various chap- ters into which the book is divided; the appendices, occupying 40 or so pages, are, however, worth a special mention. RS THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 1 American Opisthobranch Mollusks by Evetine Marcus and Ernst Marcus. Studies in Tropical Oceanography No. 6. Institute of Marine Sciences, University of Miami, Florida. De- cember 1967. pp. viii + 256; 1 color plate; 155 + 92 line drawings in text. Clothbound, $7.50. The book is divided into two sections. The first portion deals with 62 species of mollusks from Florida, the West Indies, the Pacific side of the Panama Canal Zone, and from Brazil. The second portion deals with 47 species of mollusks, mostly, if not exclusively, from the northern Gulf of California. In all, 40 new taxa are described on the species and subspecies level and 2 on the generic level; 3 replacement names are introduced. The authors have devoted many extremely productive years to the study of mollusks in general and to opistho- branchs in particular. The present work reflects the rich background in the knowledge possessed by the authors. In view of the modern trend in secondary schooling to neglect the teaching of the so-called classical languages, it might be regretted that the authors steadfastly refuse to give the etymology of the names they choose or coin. Aside from this slight flaw, the work appears to come up to the usual standards of these well known workers. It is unequivocally an important contribution to the know- ledge of a beautiful group of animals. RS THE VELIGER is open to original papers pertaining to any problem concerned with mollusks. This is meant to make facilities available for publication of original articles from a wide field of endeavor. Papers dealing with anatomical, cytological, distri- butional, ecological, histological, morphological, physiological, taxonomic, etc., aspects of marine, freshwater or terrestrial mollusks from any region, will be considered. Even topics only indirectly concerned with mollusks may be acceptable. It is the editorial policy to preserve the individualistic writing style of the author; therefore any editorial changes in a manuscript will be submitted to the author for his approval, before going to press. Short articles containing descriptions of new species or other taxa will be given preferential treatment in the speed of publication provided that arrangements have been made by the author for depositing the holotype with a recognized public Museum. Museum numbers of the type specimens must be included in the manuscript. Type localities must be defined as accurately as possible, with geo- graphical longitudes and latitudes added. Short original papers, not exceeding 500 words, may be published in the column “NOTES and NEWS’; in this column will also appear notices of meetings of regional, national and international malacological organizations, such as A.M. U., U. M. E., W.S. M., etc., as well as news items which are deemed of interest to our Members and subscribers in general. Articles on “METHODS and TECH- NIQUES” will be considered for publication in another column, provided that the information is complete and techniques and methods are capable of duplication by anyone carefully following the description given. Such articles should be mainly original and deal with collecting, preparing, maintaining, studying, photographing, etc., of mollusks or other invertebrates. A third column, entitled “INFORMA- TION DESK,” will contain articles dealing with any problem pertaining to collecting, identifying, etc., in short, problems encountered by our readers. In contrast to other contributions, articles in this column do not necessarily contain new and original materials. Questions to the editor, which can be answered in this column, are invited. The column “BOOKS, PERIODICALS, and PAMPHLETS” will attempt to bring reviews of new publications to the attention of our readers. Also, new timely articles may be listed by title only, if this is deemed expedient. Manuscripts should be typed in final form on a high grade white paper, not exceeding 81,” by 11”, at least double spaced and accompanied by a clear carbon or photo copy. A pamphlet with detailed suggestions for preparing manuscripts intended for publication in THE VELIGER is available to authors upon request. A self-addressed envelope, sufficiently large to accommodate the pamphlet (which measures 51,” by 81”), with double first class postage, should be sent with the request to the Editor. Forwarding Postage Guaranteed by Addressee but if not forwardable Return Postage Guaranteed If not delivered, return to R. STOHLER 1584 Milvia Street Berkeley, CA 94709 Second - Class Postage Paid at Berkeley California The Library Smithsonian Institution Washington, D.C. 20560 THE P ELIGER A Quarterly published by CALIFORNIA MALACOZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY, INC. Berkeley, California VOLUME II OcrToseErR 1, 1968 NUMBER 2 CoNnTENTS Five New Species of Mitridae from the Indian and Pacific Oceans. (Plate 11) aEANN Ge VIC CAE ete eh eae Sie cess ieee ae) ah Gerda Go ee 6 ee ee lo ne OG Archidoris odhneri (MacFar.Lanp, 1966) comb. nov., With some Comments on the Species of the Genus on the Pacific Coast of North America. INOBER TOURING 6 usta tte Many roe ot eels )ig) cel) ai Gioaee ou este Sota elutes: OO Quantitative Studies on Cowries (Cypraeidae) of the Allan Hancock Foundation Collections. GERALD A) BAIKUS Hen Muerte iat cn ooy a i See ee ee on ms Gator 2 OS An Additional Record for Cypraea teres in the Galapagos Islands. (Plate 12) WiInLIAM KeeEMERSON & WILLIAM, FE. Oup, fro. 2 4. 5 a 98 The Ege Masses and Veligers of Southern California Sacoglossan Opisthobranchs. (6 ‘Text figures) IRIGHARDMEWa GREENE Gi (4050 ie cack aos 2 ea rae hol ee weil ces eu TOO A New Species of Puncturella (Cranopsis) from the Northeastern Pacific. (Plate 13; 1 Text figure) Ie WMicikiCowANn, loci ou a eee, ee eles pee ce a gee ee te A An Investigation of the Commensals of Cryptochiton stelle: (MipDENDORFF, 1847) in the Monterey Peninsula Area, California. (5 Text figures) CEE WE NMI VIER SIDER rete ae ane ee ase noe en oui ae) reek oc oe TOE [Continued on Inside Front Cover] A a sn se Distributed free to Members of the California Malacozoological Society, Inc. Subscriptions (by Volume only) payable in advance to Calif. Malacozool. Soc., Inc. Volume 11: $18.- Domestic; $18.80 in the Americas; $19.20 in all other Foreign Countries Single copies this issue: $8.-. Postage extra Send subscription orders to Mrs. JEAN M. Care, 12719 San Vicente Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90049. Address all other correspondence to Dr. R. STOHLER, Editor, Department of Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720 Second Class Postage paid at Berkeley, California ConTENTs — Continued Notes on the Habitat and Anatomy of Jouannetia quillingi from North Carolina Coastal Waters. (Plate 15; 1 Text figure) Doueras\. Ay Wore! | tees. ee ee ee TE Some Observations on the Ecology and Behavior of Lucapinella callomarginata (Plate 16; 1 Text figure) RICHARD T./MILLER) 2s 15 a) ay, yom anetbeccmo hota Bunton mmol eae a ETO Banding Patterns in Haliotis — II Some Behavioral Considerations and the Effect of Diet on Shell Coloration for Haliotis rufescens, Haliotis corrugata, Haliotis sorensent, and Haliotis assimilis. (Plate 17) DAVID A.SOUSEN! (0 sy cel Sole) ts eee ae) Ome fen ea CS Haliotis pourtalesii Dati, 1881 from Florida Waters. (Plate 18) CHARLES J. GUuIGE ) a S50) Ce ey a te rege en Removal of Pea Crabs from Live Oysters by Using Sevin. Jay D. ANprews, Donna TurcEON & Marian HREHA . ...... . . IAI New Northern Limit for the Limpet, Acmaea digitalis WitiiaAm FE JESSEE/| (00.0 oo) kis ere) coll sete cele cote tc a state teers SLE Feeding Behavior of Corambella steinbergae. James W. MeBETH 50) .. #- ci) 207 eyo) salen ees sino tet Ue CO NODES S2NEWS) 0c cer Eee oy (ie C17 A New Record of Corambella steinbergae LANcE, 1962. TERRENCE GOSLINER BOOKS? PERIODICALS & PAMPHEE MS yi mentrsimcn ae ene) tease etme LAC) Note: The various taxa above species are indicated by the use of different type styles as shown by the following examples, and by increasing indentation. ORDER, Suborder, DIVISION, Subdivision, SECTION, SUPERFAMILY, Famity, Subfamily, Genus, (Subgenus) New Taxa Vol. 11; No. 2 THE VELIGER Page 85 Five New Species of Mitridae from the Indian and Pacific Oceans JEAN M. CATE 12719 San Vicente Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90049 (Plate 11) INTRODUCTION DuRING THE PAST SEVERAL YEARS a number of unknown mitrids from widespread localities have come to my at- tention from several sources. At least five of these seem to be unquestionably new species. Three of them were first encountered during my visit to Western Australia in 1966; the fourth was a single specimen from Easter Island given to me perhaps a dozen years ago by Raymond L. Summers of Petaluma, California; and the final species, from Coron, Philippine Islands, was recently sent to me for identification by Fernando G. Dayrit of Manila. All five will be described here. ACKNOWLEDGMENT I am grateful for the valuable assistance of all of the individuals and institutions mentioned herein. In addi- tion, I should like to thank Dr. Takeo Susuki for his expert help in processing my film, and Crawford Cate for many less tangible kinds of aid. 1. In October 1966, Alexander Gilbertson of Geraldton, Western Australia showed me the collection of miscel- laneous shells he has put together during several years of lobster fishing and dredging in the vicinity of the Abrol- hos Islands, some 50 miles offshore from his home base. Among these shells I noticed a species of mitrid I had never seen before; later, though it was his only specimen, Mr. Gilbertson very generously presented it to me for my own collection. About a week later, while working in the mitrid collection at the Western Australian Museum upon the invitation of its Curator of Molluscs, Dr. Barry Wilson, I found an almost identical shell from a different locality some 250 miles to the south of the Abrolhos Islands. To the best of my knowledge these are the only two specimens of this species now known. Pterygia gilbertsoni J. Cate, spec. nov. (Plate 11, Figures 1a - 1d) Shell large, solid, heavy, cylindrically ovate, ventricose, light tan in color, mottled and vaguely axially striped with irregular white “flames”. Sutures moderately im- pressed and lightly crenulated; spire slightly less than half the length of the shell. Whorls convex, numbering 8, plus 14 nuclear whorls; apex slightly eroded in both known specimens. Surface of earliest whorls decussate with numerous axial grooves and about 3 smooth, shallow spiral grooves; body whorl with 3 distinct spiral grooves at shoulder and about 8 additional irregularly-spaced, very shallowly impressed spiral grooves on body whorl to base of shell; in the paratype these are somewhat stronger than in the holotype, and appear as darker brown, faintly incised lines. Aperture about twice as long as spire, straight; labrum in the holotype thin (immature); in the paratype thick, simple and with barely perceptible callus- nodes at end-points of incised spiral lines of body whorl. Columella, aperture and lip porcelain-white. Columella calloused, with 5 to 6 prominent oblique folds; anterior canal short, straight. Discussion: Pterygia gilbertsoni is somewhat similar to P. hayashu (Kira, 1959), a rare form from Japan. It dif fers from that species by its lack of axial spots and punc- tate spiral sculpture throughout, both of these characters being prominent in P hayashu. Pterygia gilbertsoni dif- fers from P nucea (GMELIN, 1791) by its more produced spire, its faintly incised spiral sculpture which is lacking in P. nucea, its straight lip (flaring in P nucea), and the Page 86 apparent lack of a periostracum, which is blackish and fairly heavy in P nucea. Pterygia gilbertson differs from P. dactylus (LinNaAkEus, 1758) in its more produced spire, its fewer columellar folds and its less flaring lip. Holotype: No. 1129-67, Western Australian Museum, Perth, Western Australia. Length: 46.4mm; Width: 18.9 mm; Length of Aperture: 28.7mm. Collected 5 miles west of NW end of Rottnest Island in 194 fms, on sand and dead coral substrate. Leg. Hawo, 5/7/60. Paratype: No. 12379 in coll. Jean M. Cate, Los An- geles, California, U.S. A. Length: 51.6mm; Width: 20.4 mm; Length of Aperture: 32.7mm. Dredged in 24 fms on coral bottom, 4 mile NE of Eaglesnest Island, Easter Group, Abrolhos Islands, Western Australia, July 1963. Leg. Alexander Sutton Gilbertson, a crayfisherman re- siding at Geraldton; the new species is named in his honor. Type Locality: Off Rottnest Island, near Fremantle, Western Australia in 19 fms (Lat. 32°00’S; Long. 115°30’ W). The known range at present is from Rott- nest Island to the Easter Group of the Abrolhos Islands, a span of 4°32’, 2. By an interesting coincidence, the other new species from Western Australia also seems to belong to the com- paratively small genus Pterygia Ropinc, 1798. It is re- presented by a unique specimen now in the collection of the Western Australian Museum at Perth. Pterygia barrywilsoni J. CATE, spec. nov. (Plate 11, Figures 2a, 2b) Shell large, heavy, solid; cylindrically ovate, ventricose. Sutures moderately impressed, spire less than half the length of shell. Whorls convex, numbering 7 plus 1 nuclear whorl which is somewhat worn. All whorls marked by closely punctate spiral grooves, about 21 on the body whorl and 7 on the penultimate whorl. Colu- mella whitish, with 4 prominent rust-colored oblique folds. Color of shell off-white, with prominent brownish- gray to yellowish irregular flame-like axial markings; base of shell rust colored. Two fairly narrow white trans- verse zones appear at about mid-point of dorsum, though these are not so clearly defined on ventral side. Discussion: Pterygia barrywilsoni somewhat resembles P gilbertsoni, but has a rougher, rather chalky texture whereas P. gilbertsoni appears smooth and shining. Ptery- gia barrywilsoni has a distinctive surface ornament, a much more developed punctate sculpture, and a vivid coloration not present in other Pterygia species. The original museum label indicates that this specimen had THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 2 been misidentified as Scabricola sphaerulata (= S. papi- lio (Linx, 1808)), an error brought about evidently through the combination of color and pattern which are remotely similar to that species; however, P barrywilsoni quite definitely seems to fall within the subfamily Cylind- romitrinae and in the genus Pterygia because of its short spire and general shell shape. The soft parts and radula are unknown. Holotype: No. 334-66 in the Western Australian Muse- um, Perth, Western Australia. Length: 38.9mm; Width: 15.5mm; Length of Aperture: 23.0mm. Collected at Nightcliffe, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia. Leg. Jo Cunningham, 1962. Type Locality: Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia (bets, WA AOV Ss Ibo, IxO°SS) 18))). This new species has been named for Dr. Barry R. Wilson, Curator of Molluscs at the Western Australian Museum, in recognition of his pioneering activities in the field of malacology on the west coast of Australia. 3. ‘The third new species to come to my attention in the Western Australian Museum Collection is not from Aus- tralian waters, but from the Sulu Sea area near Borneo, where it was collected by the Pele-Sulu Expedition of 1964. Specimens from that expedition were shared with the museum at Perth because its Curator of Molluscs, Dr. Barry Wilson, accompanied the expedition as a collec- tor. The type lot consists of 14 shells, which will be shared with other appropriate museums of Dr. Wilson’s choice. Vexillum sitangkaianum J. CaTE, spec. nov. (Plate 11, Figures 3a, 3b) Shell long, slender, fusiform, somewhat turriculate; spire shorter than body whorl. Protoconch deviated, pauci- spiral, transparent glassy brown; teleoconch consisting of 10 flatly convex abutting whorls plus 14 nuclear whorls. Axial sculpture of prominent smooth collabral costae (10 to 11) on penultimate whorl which tend to become obsolete near outer lip; costae not regularly aligned at sutures. Spiral ornament of equidistant shallowly incised grooves, 3 on spire whorls, about 15 on body whorl, faintly granulose at neck. Aperture straight, siphonal canal short and slightly recurved. Labrum relatively thin, simple, flattened in the middle, constricted at base, nu- merous faint irregular lirae within. Columella straight, with 4 strong oblique posterior folds and one weak fold anteriorly; peristome continuous. Siphonal fasciole weak- ly produced, helicocone nonumbilicate. Wolo! 1 Not2 Shell color pure white throughout except protoconch, which is glassy brown. Protoconch present only in Para- type 7, eroded in others. Weak, colorless periostracum present in some specimens. Animal and radula unknown. Discussion: Vexillum sitangkaianum most closely resem- bles V. vulpecula (Linnageus, 1758), but differs from that species in the following ways: it has a more slender and tapering spire, more shouldered whorls, a more con- stricted base, a flattened and more constricted outer lip, fewer axial costae and a total absence of color or surface ornament. Holotype: No. 1230-67 in the Western Australian Mu- seum, Perth, Western Australia. Collected by the Pele- Sulu Expedition in 9 to 13 fms, South Lagoon, Sitangkai, Sibutu Island in the southernmost part of the Sulu Archipelago, northwestern Celebes Sea, March 25, 1964. MEASUREMENTS or tHe TYPE LOT (in millimeters ) Maximum Length of Height Diameter Aperture Holotype 34.2 13.3 20.4 Paratype 1 31.6 11.8 IV/E2, Paratype 2 Bol) oF 14.1 Paratype 3 25.6 V8) 14.6 Paratype 4 DSS) OM 15.8 Paratype 5 24.3 9.4 14.5 Paratype 6 Bae 8.5 13.6 Paratype 7' ZR Oat 14.3 Paratype 8 Zeal 8.9 13.8 Paratype 9 23.0 ie 13.0 Paratype 10 22.3 10.1 159 Paratype 11 20.4 Us eZ Paratype 12 20.0 8.9 12.1 Paratype 13 19.6 7.3 Hild ‘ with protoconch Type Locality: 9 to 13 fms, South Lagoon, Sitangkai (Lat. 4°50’ N; Long. 119°50’ E). The range of the spe- cies is unknown, as the type lot represents the only speci- mens known to me at this time. The specific name sitangkaianum is derived from the name of the type locality. 4. The fourth new species under discussion was collected at Easter Island in the southeast Pacific Ocean by Father Sebastian Englert in 1955; he sent a number of specimens to Raymond Summers, who divided them among several THE VELIGER Page 87 collections. One shell was sent to me, 4 went to the Cali- fornia Academy of Sciences, and it is believed that additional specimens were sent to the U.S. National Museum, the American Museum of Natural History, and possibly to other museums as well; no records were kept of where they were sent. The 5 specimens now in California (those at the California Academy of Sciences and in my own collection) will be enumerated as the type lot; I have not seen the shells sent elsewhere by Mr. Summers. Strigatella rapanuiensis J. CATE, spec. nov. (Plate 11, Figures 4a, 4b) Shell small, cylindrically ovate, nearly smooth; whorls slightly convex, numbering 5 including the body whorl, nucleus lacking; spire less than half the length of shell; sutures impressed; labrum thick, smooth, slightly reflec- ted in the middle, flaring at base; columella with 44 oblique folds; anterior canal very short, straight; color dark yellowish-tan with approximately equidistant deep chocolate-brown, minutely punctate spiral stripes; one pale ochre band appears in center of spire-whorls and 2 near base of shell; interior of aperture and columella glossy white. A periostracum may be present in living examples. Animal and radula unknown. Discussion: Strigatella rapanuiensis superficially re- sembles Mitra vexillum REEveE, 1844 because of its similar size and the general color and pattern. It differs, how- ever, in that the stripes are not deeply incised as in M. vexillum, instead being smooth, though minutely punc- tate; S. rapanuiensis has a lower spire, a strigatelliform outline, and a glazed white aperture, all of which are lacking in M. vexillum. The species is tentatively assigned to the genus Striga- tella on the basis of its reflected lip, and its general outline and color which conform to the typical characters of that genus; however, further research is needed to determine whether this placement is correct. Among the Strigatellas it most closely resembles S. tristis (BRODERIP, 1836) from the Panamic Province, but the presence of the striped pattern and a lack of a whitish band below the sutures, among other characters, mark it as clearly different from S. trastis. Holotype: No. CAS 13103 in the California Academy of Sciences Geology Department Type Collection, San Francisco, California. Leg. Father Sebastian Englert, 1955. Paratypes: Paratypes 1 to 3 in the California Academy of Sciences Geology Department Type Collection (CAS 13104, 13105, 13106), San Francisco, California. Para- Page 88 type 4 in the collection of Jean M. Cate, Los Angeles, California (No. 12380). MEASUREMENTS or tHe TYPE LOT (in millimeters) Maximum Length of Height Diameter Aperture Holotype 25.0 1179 15.7 Paratype 1 22.1 10.4 15)67/ Paratype 2 Al 10.8 14.4 Paratype 3 21.4 10.8 14.4 Paratype 4 24.3 11S 15.6 Type Locality: Easter Island (Rapa Nui), south Paci- fic Ocean (Lat. 29°00’S; Long. 109°30’ W). The spe- cific name rapanuiensis is derived from the local name for the type locality. The range of the species is unknown, as the type lot constitutes the only specimens of record at present. Addendum: My conviction that the single specimen I received nearly a dozen years ago was a valid new species now seems to be borne out by the discovery of at least 9 additional specimens (including the 4 at the California Academy of Sciences). I have recently verified that the American Museum of Natural History has at least one specimen (W. E. Old, Jr., personal communication). After the species description was in manuscript I received 4 additional shells as a further gift from Mr. Summers; these had been collected by Father Englert (presumably at the same locality) in 1965 — ten years later than the original lot. I have not included the measurements of these specimens with those of the type lot, but note that they all fall within the size range listed above. It is likely, from Mr. Summers’ recollections, that specimens of Strigatella rapanuiensis exist in the collection at the U.S. National Museum and possibly others as well. 5. The final new species to be described is a small, colorful shell from the southern Philippines; it is repre- sented by two nearly identical specimens. THE VELIGER Vol: i= INow2 Vexillum coronense J. CATE, spec. nov. (Plate 11, Figures 5a, 5b) Shell small, slender, fusiform, somewhat turriculate; spire about the same height as the body whorl. Protoconch lacking in both known specimens; teleoconch consists of 8 flatly convex whorls. Axial sculpture of 10 prominent costae (11 to 12 on penultimate whorl) which are not regularly aligned at sutures. Sutures impressed; spiral ornament consists of numerous equidistant shallowly in- cised transverse grooves (15 on body whorl) in intercostal interstices, becoming nearly obsolete over ribs. Aperture straight, siphonal canal short and slightly recurved. Neck of shell, starting at first posterior columellar fold, is coarsely ribbed, granulose. Labrum thin, simple, con- stricted at base, with numerous faint irregular lirae within. Columella straight, with 3 strong oblique folds posteriorly and 1 very weak fold anteriorly. Siphonal fasciole weakly produced, helicocone nonumbilicate. Shell color bright, deep orange except neck and colu- mella which are both porcelain-white. First 4 whorls bear narrow white spiral bands; final 2 to 3 whorls are surrounded by a fainter orange band at periphery. Animal and radula unknown. Discussion: Vexillum coronense is so markedly different from any other species known to me that it was difficult to select a species for diagnostic comparison. Almost ar- bitrarily I have chosen V. moana J. Cate, 1963 because of its similarity in coloration and construction at the base of the shell; the sharply defined rugose white base is striking in both species. Otherwise, however, V. coronense and V. moana differ markedly, V. coronense being more slenderly tapering and having an altogether different sculpture, surface ornament and color. In overall shape Vexillum coronense more closely re- sembles V. intertaeniatum (SowerBy, 1874), but that species lacks the interstitial spiral sculpture, is not con- stricted at the base, has a greater number of axial costae and bears a different type of surface ornament. The color of V. coronense recalls the brilliant orange of V. taenia- tum (Lamarck, 1811), but is perhaps a shade or two deeper and richer in color than V. taeniatum. Explanation of Plate 11 Figures 1 a, 1b: Holotype, Plerygia gilbertsoni, spec. nov. (ca. X1) Figures 1c, 1d: Paratype, Pterygia gilbertsoni, spec. nov. (X 1) Figures 2a, 2b: Holotype, Pterygia barrywilsoni, spec. nov. ( X 14) Figure 3.a,3b: Holotype, Vexillum sitangkaianum, spec. nov. (X 14) Figures 4a, 4b: Holotype, Strigatella rapanuiensis, spec. nov. (X 2) Figures 5a, 5b: Holotype, Vexillum coronense, spec. nov. (X 3) Tue VELIcER, Vol. 11, No. 2 [J. Care] Plate 11 Figure 1c Figure 2b photographs by Jean M. Cate Wolk ll: No. 2 THE VELIGER Page 89 Holotype: No. 13112 in the California Academy of ean ee FREDERICH ant ; : “ : ystema naturae per regna tria naturae itio peromces Gec doey Department Type Calicenion, San Fran decima tertia, aucta, reformata 1 (6): 3021 - 3910 Lipsia. cisco, California. Length: 16.7mm; Width: 6.0mm; ein, TRS Length of Aperture: 8.3mm. 1959. Descriptions on Siphonalia trochulus tokaiensis, n. sub- Paratype: No. 12382 in collection of Jean M. Cate, sp., and Mitra hayashu, n. sp. Venus 20 (4): 339 - 342; Los Angeles, California. Masts ew : 4 - Phil Lamarck, JEAN-BAPTISTE PIERRE ANTOINE DE MONET DE Type Locality: Coron Island, Calamian Group, Phil- 1811. Sur la détermination des espéces parmi les animaux sans ippine Islands (Lat. 12°10’ N; Long. 120°13’ E). The specific name coronense is derived from the name of the type locality. LITERATURE CITED Broverip, WILLIAM JOHN 1836. Genus Mitra (Lamarck & Swainson). Soc. London for 1835, part 3: 192 - 198 Care, JEAN McCreery 1963. Revision of Dati’s Hawaiian Mitrids with descriptions of three new species (Mollusca: Gastropoda) . The Veliger 6 (1): 23-43; plts. 5-8, 1 map (1 July 1963) Proc. Zool. (8 April 1836) vertébres, et particulierement parmi les mollusques testacés. Ann. Mus. d’Hist. Nat. Paris (Mitra) 17: 195 - 222 (July 1811) Link, Hertnricu FRIEDRICH 1807. Beschreibung der Naturaliensammlung der Universitat zu Rostock, 2%¢ - 3'¢ Abth., pp. 82 - 160 (29 March-17 May, 1807) LINNAEUS, CAaROLUS 1758. | Systema naturae per regna tria naturae. Ed. 10, refor- mata. Holmiae 1 (1): 1-824 REEVE, LoveLL AUGUSTUS 1844-1845. Conchologia Iconica. Monograph of the genus Mitra. 10: plts. 1 - 39 SoweErBy, GEorcE BRETTINGHAM 1874. Thesaurus Conchyliorum. Mitra. 4: 1 - 46; plts. 1 - 28. Monograph of the genus Page 90 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 2 Archidoris odhnert (MacFartanp, 1966) comb. nov., With some Comments on the Species of the Genus on the Pacific Coast of North America BY ROBERT BURN Honorary Associate in Conchology National Museum of Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria IN HIS MAGNIFICENT memorial volume on the Opistho- branchia of the Pacific Coast of North America (1966), the late Frank Mace MacFaruanp introduced many new species with minutely detailed descriptions and beau- tifully executed plates, both in colour and pen and wash. The validity and synonymy of the new species is a desideratum for students of the opisthobranch molluscs the world over and remains an important task for com- petent Pacific Coast researchers. In some instances, the generic placement of species is open to question. The present contribution, though very short, presents the case for the generic transfer of one species. Within the large family Dorididae, often the only cri- teria for generic separation are found in differences of the reproductive systems. Thus, genera have been founded upon the armature or its absence in the male and female ducts, the presence of a prostate gland whether discrete, a mere dilation or its absence, and the formation of the spermatheca and spermatocyst in their modes of attach- ment to the vagina and uterine duct and in their rela- tionship to one another. In the subfamily Doridinae (OpHNER, 1939: 26, 27; = Doridinae plus Archidori- dinae of OpHNer, 1926: 54), the external and pharyngeal differences between some genera are so slight that only careful examination of the reproductive organs can in- dicate the true generic position. Thus in the following text, considerable emphasis is placed on the various parts of the reproductive organs. Austrodoris odhneri MacFaruanp, 1966 (173 - 179; plt. 26; plt. 29, fig. 14; plt. 36, figs. 1-19) is a large apparently rare dorid from the Monterey Bay region of California. MacFarLanp (pp. 171-173) gave a generic definition, noted that his species was the first of the genus from the northern hemisphere, and tabled the valid and reputed species of the genus. The writer has recently examined 3 species of Austrodoris from Austral- ian Antarctica as well as 2 species of Archidoris from New Zealand and Heard Island (an Australian depend- ency in the subantarctic Indian Ocean), during which time a survey of the literature of these 2 genera was made. Austrodoris ODHNER, 1926 (p. 55) is defined as having (1) the winding vas deferens of uniform diameter with- out prostate gland or prostatic section, and enclosed with- in a tough leathery sheath for its whole length, (2) no penis or penial armature, and (3) the spermatheca and spermatocyst in vaginal combination. Almost all know- ledge of Austrodoris is contained in two papers (ODHNER, 1926, 1934) where good figures of the reproductive sys- tems of various species are given. Study of MacFaranp’s figure (1966: plt. 36, fig 7) shows that Austrodoris odhneri has (1) the vas deferens at first wider and coiled, then much narrower and winding tortuously within a long broad sheath of fibrous tissue, (2) the former terminating in a low wide penial papilla, and (3) the spermatheca and spermatocyst in semiserial combination. As these reproductive differences are of generic value, Austrodoris odhneri cannot be maintained in Austrodoris. However, this species does closely resemble Archidoris wellingtonensis (ABRAHAM, 1877, p. 259) from New Zealand in which (1) the vas deferens is at first narrow and neatly coiled in a glomerate mass, then wider and straighter as it passes through the long broad sheath of fibrous tissue, (2) there is a low wide penial papilla, and (3) the spermatheca and spermatocyst are in semiserial combination. Hence the writer believes Austrodoris odh- nert and Archidoris wellingtonensis to be congeneric and the former to belong to Archidoris BeRcH, 1878, where it will be known by the new combination Archidoris odhnern (MacFar.anp, 1966). Vol. 11; No. 2 On the other hand, the reproductive system of Archi- doris montereyensis (Cooper, 1862) (MacFarLanp, 1966, p. 181), a common species of the Pacific Coast from Alaska to San Diego (STEINBERG, 1963: 70), differs con- siderably from A. odhneri in that there is a very distinct- ive digitiform penis and the spermatheca and spermato- cyst, while still semiserially combined, lie very close together. These reproductive characteristics are also pres- ent in specimens of A. kerguelensis Bercu, 1884 (p. 85) from Heard Island. It seems therefore that a re-appraisal of generic and subgeneric units is necessary for these species of Archidoris, but this must await comparative examinations with specimens of the type species of the genus, Archidoris tuberculata (Cuvier, 1804). Furthermore, it should be pointed out that Marcus, 1961 (p. 16) appears to have confused Archidoris odh- neri and Archidoris montereyensis. His figure of the re- productive system (plt. 3, fig. 55) suggests by the spacing of the spermatheca and spermatocyst and the absence of a distinct penis that he examined small specimens of Archidoris odhneri. Two other species of Archidoris are reported from the Pacific Coast of North America. The first is A. tubercu- lata (Cuvier, 1804) to which there are but two references. In the “Albatross” report on the dredgings along and off the American west coasts, BercH (1894: 158) gives a brief description of some Atlantic specimens of A. tuber- culata, and in a separate paragraph (p. 159) records a single specimen from off La Paz, Baja California (24°11’ N, 109°55’ W) in 10 fathoms. It was somewhat like A. montereyensis in colour and shape of the radular teeth though these were rather more numerous in number of rows and teeth per half row (formula 56x 84084). This specimen was 21 mm long, 14mm broad and 9mm high. BERGH was quite familiar with A. tuberculata from European and eastern Atlantic waters with its distinctive patterning of larger tubercles set among more numerous smaller tubercles (ALDER & Hancock, 1854; Family 1, pit. 3, figs. 1-2, 6). As this specimen had a radular for- mula within the range of that species, he no doubt considered it identical. O’DoNoGHUE (1926, p. 207) re- corded this specimen as Archidoris britannica (JOHNSTON, 1838). Shortly afterwards, BeErcH (1900: 221) recorded a smaller specimen from Bare Island (between Vancouver Island and the Canadian mainland) which he also identi- fied with Archidoris tuberculata. It was only 13mm long, 8mm broad and 4mm high with the radular formula 29 x 37-037. In this specimen the number of teeth per row is half that of European specimens, hence the iden- tification must be regarded as rather uncertain. THE VELIGER Page 91 Zoogeographically, it is possible that Archidoris tuber- culata should occur on both coasts of North America. Already there are several nudibranch species with this distribution, viz. Aeolidia papillosa (LinNAEus, 1761), Onchidoris bilamellata (LinNaEuS, 1767), Dendronotus frondosus (Ascantus, 1774) (Marcus, 1961: 56-57). These 3 species also occur in Hokkaido, northern Japan (Basa, 1957) and A. tuberculata is recorded from far eastern Russian seas (VOLODSCHENKO, 1941: 60; 1955: Ja), Itskd8 Foyle Gao, sitex, Se ABRAHAM'S specimens from Vancouver Island, listed as Doris tuberculata (1877: 198), were examined by O’Do- NOGHUE (1926: 206, footnote) who found them to be identical with Archidoris montereyensis. The last species of Archidoris is A. nyctea BERGH, 1900 (p. 222) from Bare Island. It is known only from a single 50mm long specimen with small (2mm diameter) and smaller rounded tubercles and 8 branchiae. The radula of 37 x 70:0:70 is both very close in formula and shape of teeth to A. montercyensis. Similarly, the repro- ductive organs with the vas deferens coiled into a twisted mass and the semiserial spermatheca and spermatocyst each with a long duct, are very close to A. montereyensis (MacFartanp, 1966: 182; plt. 37, figs. 9, 10). BercH appears not to have examined A. montereyensis in detail (1878: 624; 1879: 107) except for the radula, hence when confronted with reasonably fresh material in which a spurious rhachidian tooth occurred, he preferred to create a new species instead of referring it to the former. Until it can be shown otherwise, the writer believes that A. nyctea should be maintained among the synonymy of A. montereyensis. O DONOGHUE (1921: 154; 1926: 206) does not mention A. nyctea as a separate species nor list it among the synonymy of any other species. To summarize, there are four points: 1. Study of various figures of reproductive systems show that Austrodoris odhneri MacFarLanp, 1966 is unten- able in that genus and must be transferred to Archidoris in the new combination Archidoris odhneri (MaAcFar- LAND, 1966). 2. Three species of Archidoris occur on the Pacific Coast of North America: A. montereyensis (Cooper, 1862) with low bluntly conical small tubercles of uniform size is widespread and common; A. odhneri (MAcFaRLAND, 1966) with low large and small tubercles is rarer and probably often confused with the first; and A. tuberculata (Cuvier, 1804) with larger tubercles set in a field of smaller tubercles is reported from 2 internally differing specimens. 3. Archidoris nyctea BercH, 1900 is most probably a junior synonym of A. montereyensis; its only distinction is a spurious rhachidian in the radula. Page 92 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 2 4. Archidoris tuberculata from Baja California and Bare Island needs to be re-discovered and compared directly with European specimens. The Bare Island specimen may be only a small A. montereyensis with somewhat reduced radula; that from Baja California may represent an extra- limital southern form of the same species in which the radula has evolved a greater number of teeth. LITERATURE CITED ABRAHAM, P. 1877. Revision of the anthobranchiate nudibranchiate Mol- lusca. Proc. Zool. Soc. London 1877: 196 - 269; plts. 27 to 30 (August 1877) ALDER, JosHuA, « ALBANY HaNcock 1845 - 1855. A monograph of the British nudibranchiate mollusca 1845. Ray. Soc., pts. 1-7. Basa, K1KUTARO 1957. A revised list of the species of Opisthobranchia from the northern part of Japan. Journ. Fac. Sci. Hokkaido Univ. 6, Zool. 13 (1-4): 8- 14 Bercu, Lupwic SopHus RUDOLF 1878. | Malacologische Untersuchungen. In C. SEMPER, Reisen im Archipel der Philippinen 2 (14): 603-645; plts. 66 - 68 1879. On the nudibranchiate gastropod mollusca of the north Pacific ocean, with special reference to those of Alaska. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, pt. 1: 71-132; plts. 1-8. 1884. | Report on the Nudibranchiata. Challenger Exped. 10: 1 - 154; plts. 1 - 14 1894. Reports on the dredging operations off the west coast of central America to the Galapagos, to the west coast of Mexico and in the Gulf of California, in charge of Alexander Agassiz, carried on by the U.S. Fish Commission steamer “Alba- tross’, during 1891. XIII. Die Opisthobranchien. _—_ Bull. Mus. Rep. Sci. Results Comp. Zool., Harvard Univ. 25 (10): 125 - 233; plts. 1-12 (October 1894) 1900. Ergebnisse einer Reise nach dem Pacific. Zool. Jahrb., Abt. Syst. 13: 207 - 246; plts. 19-21 MacFarianp, Frank Mace 1966. Studies of opisthobranchiate mollusks of the Pacific Coast of North America. Mem. Calif. Acad. Sci. 6: xvi + 546 pp.; 72 plts. (8 April 1966) Marcus, ErNstT 1961. | Opisthobranch mollusks from California. The Veliger 3 (Supplement, pt. I) : 1-85; plts. 1-10. (Feb. 1, 1961) Opuner, Nits HyjALMAR 1926. Die Opisthobranchien. in: Further Zoological Re- searches of the Swedish Antarctic Expedition 1901-1903, 2 (1): 1-100; plts. 1-3. 1934. | The Nudibranchiata. In British Antarctic (“Terra Nova”) Expedition, 1910. Nat. Hist. Rep. Zool. 7 (5): 229-310; plts. 1-3. London. O’ DONOGHUE, CHARLES HENRY 1921. Nudibranchiate mollusca from the Vancouver Island region. ‘Trans. Roy. Canad. Inst. 13 (1): 147-209; plts. 7-11 1926. A list of the nudibranchiate mollusca recorded from the Pacific coast of North America, with notes on their distribution. Trans. Roy. Canad. Inst. 15 (2): 199 - 247. STEINBERG, JOAN EmILy 1963. Notes on the opisthobranchs of the West Coast of North America - IV. A distributional list of opisthobranchs from Point Conception to Vancouver Island. The Veliger 6 (2) : 68 to 73 (1 October 1963) VoLopcHENKO, N. I. 1941. New nudibranchiate molluscs from seas of the far east of the U.S.S.R. 53 - 68; plts. 1-4 1955. Atlas of the invertebrates of the eastern seas of Russia. Russian Acad. Sci. Moscow and Leningr. (Opisthobranchia: 181-185) 240 pp.; 66 plts. Invest. Far East. Seas U.S.S.R. 1: Vol. 11; No. 2 _ THE VELIGER Page 93 Quantitative Studies on the Cowries (Cypraeidae) of the Allan Hancock Foundation Collections BY GERALD J. BAKUS Allan Hancock Foundation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90007 ' THE CypRAEIDAE OF THE ALLAN Hancock Foundation Collections consist of shells and preserved specimens taken during the Hancock Pacific and Atlantic Expeditions (see Fraser, 1943; Gartu, 1945). The remainder of the col- lection includes cowrie shells collected from the Indo- Pacific by various persons. Because information obtained on Hancock Expediton-collected Cypraeidae is detailed, quantitative studies were made on these specimens. Most cowries included in this paper are presently on loan to the Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History under the care of Dr. James H. McLean, Curator of Invertebrate Zoology. For convenience, the order of pres- entation of information is as follows: 1) Panamic Re- gion; 2) Caribbean Region; and 3) Indo-Pacific Re- gion. Continental and insular geographical distribution of Hancock Panamic and Caribbean Cypraeidae is dis- cussed alphabetically by species. Quantitative information is summarized in ‘Table 1, using standard statistical tests found in Bamey (1959) and Simpson et al. (1963). Hancock station number, latitude and longitude are in- dicated in parentheses. Distributions, habitats, and shell measurements are based on mature specimens unless otherwise indicated. Hancock Indo-Pacific species are listed alphabetically. Raw data and detailed records of Hancock Cypraeidae are on file in the Hancock Foun- dation. The living Cypracidae of the western hemisphere, including data on certain meristic characters, are dis- cussed in INGRAM (1951). A more recent summary of Panamic cowrie distribution is given by Keen (1958) and Emerson & Orp (1963), and that of Caribbean cowrie distribution by WARMKE & Apspott (1961). Mol- lusks of the Galapagos Archipelago are covered in part by HERTLEIN & Strone (1955) and the Galapagos Cyp- raeidae by INcRAM (1948). ' Allan Hancock Foundation Contribution No. 313 PANAMIC CYPRAEIDAE 1. Cypraea (Erosaria) albuginosa Gray, 1825 Localities: San Francisquito Bay, Gulf of California (AHF 531-36; 28°25'55” N and 112°53’30” W) south to Braithwaite Bay, Socorro Island, Mexico (AHF 128 -34; 18°42’45” N and 110°56’50” W) ; Bahia Honda, Panama (AHF 247-34; 7°43’32” N and 81°32’19” W) south to Port Utria, Colombia (AHF 419-35; 5°59’10” N and 77°21’20” W) and Sulivan Bay, James Island, Galapagos Archipelago (AHF 796-38; 00°17/00” S and 90°35/13” W). Specimens examined: 26 adults and 1 immature; 1 adult specimen is preserved (AHF 2601-54). Remarks: Data from the Hancock Collections support KeeEn’s (1958) statement that this species has a dis- continuous distribution, i. e., between the mid-Gulf of California and Socorro Island (Hancock data) and Manzanillo, Mexico (McLean, pers. communic.) and from Panama to Ecuador and the Galapagos. There is no significant difference in adult shell lengths between the northern and southern populations (‘Student’s’ f- teste 0105) 2. Cypraea (Zonaria) annettae Dat, 1909 Localities: Tepoca Bay, Sonora, Gulf of California (AHF 1077-40; 30°15’45” N and 112°53’20” W) and Puerto Refugio, Angel de la Guarda, Gulf of California (AH F 1049-40; 29°32’47” N and 113°34’35” W) south to Agua Verde Bay, Gulf of California (AHF 655-37; 25°31’00” N and 111°01’45”W) and San Gabriel Bay, Espiritu Santo Island, Gulf of California (AHF 634-37; 24°25'25” N and 110°20'55” W). Specimens examined: 46 adults and 17 immatures. 3. Cypraea (Zonaria) arabicula LAMarRck, 1811 Localities: Isabel Island, Gulf of California (AHF 124- 33; 21°51’30” N and 105°53’35” W) and west of is- lets off Navidad Head, Tenacatita Bay, Mexico (AHF Page 94 275-34; 19°12’50” N and 104°49’48” W) south to La Plata Island, Ecuador (AHF 22-33; 01°16’00” S and 81°05’10” W) and west of Manta, Ecuador (AHF 403-35; 00°56’43” S and 80°44’43” W). Specimens examined: 38 adults and 24 immatures; 1 adult specimen is preserved (AHF 2596-54). 4. Cypraea (Macrocypraea) cervinetta KieNER, 1843 Localities: Isabel Island, South of Mazatlan, Mexico (AHF 278-34; 21°51’30” N and 105°53’35” W) and Tenacatita Bay, Mexico (AHF 272-34; 19°16’38” N and 104°50’35” W) south to the Galapagos Archipel- ago (6 stations) and west of Manta, Ecuador (AHF 403-35; 00°56’43” S and 80°44’43” W). Specimens examined: 29 adults and 58 immatures. 5. Cypraea (Luria) isabellamexicana STEARNS, 1893 Localities: Secas Islands, Panama (AHF 867-38; 07°57’ 10” N and 82°00’45” W) south to Sulivan Bay, James Island, Galapagos Archipelago (AHF 796-38; 00°17’ 00” S and 90°35’13” W). Specimens examined: 4 adults. Remarks: SHasxy (1961) reported collecting 3 living specimens of this species near Guaymas, Sonora, Mex- ico. McLean (personal communication) says that it occurs with relative frequency around Cape San Lucas, Baja California. 6. Cypraea (Zonaria) nigropunctata Gray, 1828 Localities: Jicarita Island, Panama (AHF 243-34; 07° 12/50” N and 81°48’05” W) south to the Galapagos Archipelago (15 stations). Specimens examined: 26 adults and 18 immatures. 7. Cypraea (Zonaria) robertsi Hwatco, 1906 Localities: Puerto Culebra, Costa Rica (AHF 115-33; 10°25’20” N and 85°40’20” W) south to Port Utria, Colombia (AHF 413-35; 5°59/10” N and 77°21/20” W) and off North Point, Gorgona Island, Colombia (AHF 409-35; 3°02’00” N and 78°10’30” W). Specimens examined: 15 adults and 3 immatures. 8. Cypraea (Zonaria) spadicea Swainson, 1823 Localities: South of San Miguel Island, California (AHF 894-38; 34°01’00” N and 120°24’00” W) and Portu- guese Bend, California (AHF 1446-42; 33°44’10” N 118°22’06” W) south to mouth of Rio Santo Tomas, outer Baja California (AHF 1595-47; 32° N and 117° W) and Melpomene Cove, Guadalupe Island (AHF 1920-49; 28°51'03” N and 118°17’43” W). Specimens examined: 47 adults and 2 immatures. Remarks: Smitu (1962) reported the collection of 20 specimens off Cypress Point, Monterey County, Cali- fornia, at a depth of 80 feet (24m). THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No..2 9. Cypraea (Blasicrura) teres GmMeuin, 1791 Localities: Secas Islands, Panama (AHF 447-35; 07°57’ 10” N and 82°00’45” W) south to Bahia Honda, Pan- ama (AHF 247-34; 07°43’32” N and 81°32/19” W). Specimens examined: 2 adults. Remarks: The specimen taken at Bahia Honda, Panama, represents the first record of this Indo-Pacific species from the Pacific American coast, so far as is known. The first report from the Galapagos Archipelago (beach, Puerto Grande, San Salvador Island) was that of EMERSON & Oxp (1965). ATLANTIC CYPRAEIDAE 1. Cypraea (Luria) cinerea GmeEun, 1791 Localities: Punta Arenas, Joyuda, Puerto Rico (Mattox 92); Punta Basora, Aruba, Netherlands West Indies (A 16-39); and Buccoo Reef, Tabago Island, British West Indies ( A41-39). Specimens examined: 9 adults; 5 of these are preserved (A 41-39). 2. Cypraca (Erosaria) spurca LinNAEuS, 1758 Localities: Outside Caledonia Bay, Panama (A 10-39), Cabo Mala Pascua, Puerto Rico (Mattox 137), and southwest of San Nicolaas Bay, Aruba, Netherlands West Indies (A 18-39). Specimens examined: 7 adults; 1 specimen is preserved (A 18-39). 3. Cypraca (Macrocypraea) zebra LinNAEus, 1758 Localities: Rincon, Puerto Rico (Mattox 88). Specimens examined: 1 adult and 1 immature. INDO-PACIFIC CYPRAEIDAE The number of shells examined for each species is placed in parenthesis. 1. Cypraca (Monetaria) annulus Linnaeus, 1758 (503) 2. Cypraca (Mauritia) arabica Linnaeus, 1758 (35) 3. Cypraca (Palmadusta) artuffeli JoussEAUME, 1876 (2) 4. Cypraca (Erosaria) caputserpentis LinNAEUS, 1758 (49) 5. Cypraca (Cypraea) carneola Linnaezus, 1758 (3) 6. Cypraca (Erronea) caurica LinNAEUuS, 1758 (2) 7. Cypraca (Bistolida) coxeni Cox, 1873 (4) 8. Cypraca (Mauriti) depressa Gray, 1824 (8) 8. Cypraca (Mauritia) depressa Gray, 1824 (8) 9. Cypraca (Erosaria) erosa LINNAEUS, 1758 (20) 10. Cypraea (Erronea) errones LinnaEus, 1758 (11) 11. Cypraca (Erronea) felina GMEun, 1791 (1) Vol. 11; No. 2 12. Cypraea (Palmadusta) gracilis GasKotn, 1848 (14) 13. Cypraea (Erosaria) helvola Linnaeus, 1758 (14) 14. Cypraea (Bistolida) hirundo Linnagus, 1758 (5) 15. Cypraca (Luria) isabella LINNAEUS, 1758 (12) 16. Cypraea (Erosaria) labrolineata Gasxotn, 1848 (5) 17. Cypraea (Cypraea) lynx Linnaeus, 1758 (18) 18. Cypraea (Palmadusta) lutea Gmeuin, 1791 (1) 19. Cypraea (Mauritia) maculifera ScuiLpER, 1932 (7) 20. Cypraca (Erosaria) miliaris GmMeuin, 1791 (5) 21. Cypraea (Monetaria) moneta LinnaEus, 1758 (492) 22. Cypraea (Erronea) onyx LINNAEUS, 1758 (7) 23. Cypraea (Bistolida) pallidula Gasxotn, 1849 (3) 24. Cypraea (Erosaria) poraria LINNAEUS, 1758 (1) 25. Cypraea (Bistolida) quadrimaculata Gray, 1824 (1) 26. Cypraea (Mauritia) scurra GMELIN, 1791 (1) 27. Cypraea (Talparia) talpa Linnarus, 1758 (1) 28. Cypraea (Cypraea) tigris LinnaEus, 1758 (5) 29. Cypraca (Cypraea) vitellus LINNAEUS, 1758 (7) 30. Cypraea (Erronea) walkeri Sowersy, 1832 (2) 31. Pustularia (Pustularia) cicercula (Linnagus, 1758) (1) 32. Pustularia (Pustularia) globulus (Linnagus, 1758) (1) 33. Staphylaea (Staphylaea) limacina (Lamarck, 1810) (3) 34, Staphylaea (Staphylaea) nucleus (LinNAEus, 1758) (7) 35. Staphylaea (Staphylaea) staphylaea (Linnaeus, 1758) (2) DISCUSSION The discontinuous distribution of Cypraea albuginosa has been narrowed, but reasons for the discontinuity are ob- scure. It is assumed that geographical isolation, if gen- uine, may have taken place in relatively recent geological history because the meristic and ornamental features of shells in the two populations are similar. Geographical isolation may have originated during Pleistocene periods of wandering isotherms (see BANDy, 1967). ScHILDER & ScuHiLpEr (1938) consider the two populations to be different races, but this decision is questionable according to IncraM (1951) and quantitative data from the present author. Cypraea teres is reported from the Pacific coast of the Americas for the first time, so far as is known. From present data on habitat affinity and information on Cyp- raeidae from eastern Pacific Islands (EMERSON & OLD, 1965), it is suggested that this Indo-Pacific species may live on the Pacific coast of Central America in very small numbers because of the absence, with few exceptions, of THE VELIGER Page 95 coral reefs. EMerson (1967) noted that 47% of the Clipperton Island (atoll) molluscan fauna has Indo-Pa- cific affinities and concluded that the present impover- ishment of coral reef habitat would appear to be the primary factor that limits establishment of Indo-Pacific mollusks in the Panamic region. I agree with EMERSON and would add that lack of coral reefs would also imply possible lack of specific foods preferred by Indo-Pacific mollusks. Moreover, complex spatial heterogeneity (e. g., coral reefs) would appear to be an important factor in the maintenance of high species diversity since it provides numerous physical “niches” and this would offer the po- tential for frequent biological interactions. Some of the major reasons why Panamic animals have not been suc- cessful in invading the Indo-Pacific region include pat- terns of ocean currents, brief larval periods, competition (Briccs, 1967), and in the case of Panamic cowries, their affinity for non-coral hard substrates (see below). An analysis of Table 1 provides certain insights into cowrie populations. Caution should be taken since the number of stations and specimens is somewhat low and approximately equal effort and time in collecting cowries were not allotted to each of the habitats. All Panamic cowries were collected more frequently on rock than on coral and several species showed no significant affinity for coral over sand. This suggests that most Panamic cowries may not be well adapted to the coral reef habitat, some- thing quite different from that of many Indo-Pacific Cypraeidae. Moreover, those Panamic species with close Indo-Pacific affinities (i. e., Cypraea isabellamexicana and C. teres) may have the most restricted habitat preferences but the data are insufficient to support this hypothesis. Cypraea albuginosa, C’. robertsi and C. spadicea show the greatest affinity for marine plants. Whether this is indi- rectly related to feeding specificity is unknown. Cypraea albuginosa and C. spadicea show the greatest depth distri- bution and C’. cervinetta the least, since the latter species was collected at 28 shore stations from a total of 29 stations. Mean adult shell lengths are greatest in C. cervinetta and least in C’. albuginosa and C. robertsi. Shell lengths of the vicariate (very closely related) species C’. cervinetta and its Caribbean counterpart C’. zebra are similar although sufficient data are lacking for the latter species. Confidence in the position of mean shell length is greatest in C. annettae and least in C. cervinetta. All species (with data calculated) show a somewhat high degree of variation in shell length with C. roberts: the most variable and C’. cervinetta the least variable for their respective sizes. The statistics present here, with the exception of certain coefficients of variation, compare favorably with those of ScHILDER & SCHILDER (1966) for the same species. Data from the present study serve to Page 96 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 2 Table 1 Habitat, depth, and shell length of cowries (Cypraea) from the Pacific and Atlantic Hancock Expeditions gs Bey og £ a os s = g Sea So uae : oe g 03 *) as) o po Species Se a2 eI § § pa ral 40 4 ae) a ae} =| ae} s Cypraea albuginosa _ 22 35% 18% 4% 21% - 4% - 11% 7% annettae 28 55% 14% 10% 7% 10% 7% — - = arabicula 20 73% 9% 4% 14% = - - - = cervinetta 29 67% 7% 13% 10% - 3% - - = cinerea 3 2stations — - lstation — - - - = isabellamexicana 3 2stations — - lstation — - - - - nigropunctata 17 83% 11% - 6% - = = = a robertsi 10 62% - 8% 7% - - - 23% = spadicea 27 55% 7% 21% - - - 7% = 10% Spurca * 3 - - - Il station station -— - - = teres 2 - - - 2stations — - - - = zebra * 1 - - - - - - - = = provide information necessary for partial interpretation of population structure. What is needed are specific data on age and sex distribution, natality per female, mortality, and considerably greater emphasis on ecological aspects such as specific habitat affinity and feeding habits. Be- cause cowries are thought to be rather specialized carni- vores, feeding on ascidians (GRAHAM, 1955), detailed knowledge of food and habitat should provide a logical basis for successful discovery leading to thorough bio- logical studies. ACKNOWLEDGMENT Greatly appreciated are the initial identifications of Hancock cowries by the late Dr. Norman T. Mattox, Allan Hancock Foundation, and especially the recent identifications made by Mr. Crawford N. Cate, Los Angeles, California. The manuscript was kindly read by Dr. John S, Garth, Allan Hancock Foundation, and Dr. James H. McLean, Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History. Of considerable help were the references provided by and cooperation given by Dr. McLean. LITERATURE CITED BariLey, Norman T. J. 1959. Statistical methods in biology. London, England (English Univ. Press) Banpy, OrvILLE L. 1967. Problems of Tertiary foraminiferal and radiolarian zona- tion, circum-Pacific area. pp. 95-102 in: Harat, K. (ed.) i-ix + 200 pp. Tertiary correlations and climatic changes in the Pacific. Symp. No. 25 of the 11™ Pacific Sci. Congr. (1966). Sasaki Publ. Co., Sendai, Japan, pp. 1 - 102 Briccs, JoHN C. 1967. Dispersal of tropical marine shore animals: coriolis Nature 216 (5113): 350 parameters or competition? Emerson, WILLIAM KEITH 1967. Indo-Pacific faunal elements in the tropical eastern Pacific, with special reference to the mollusks. Venus 25 (3-4) : 85 - 93 Emerson, WiLuiAm KeituH & WILLIAM Erwoop OL, Jr. 1963. Results of the Puritan-American Museum of Natural History expedition to western Mexico. 17. The recent mollusks: Gastropoda, Cypraeacea. Amer. Mus. Novitates no. 2136, 32 pp; 18 text figs. New York, N. Y. 1965. | New molluscan records for the Galapagos Islands. Nautilus 78 (4): 116 - 120 Fraser, C, McLean 1943. | General account of the scientific work of the Velcro III in the eastern Pacific, 1931-41. Part III. A ten-year list of the Velero III collecting stations. Allan Hancock Pac. Exped. 1 (3): 259-431. Univ. South. Calif: Press, Los Angeles. Calif. GarTH, JOHN S. 1945. | Geographical account and station records of Velero III in Atlantic waters in 1939. Allan Hancock Atlantic Exped. Rept. 1: 1 - 106 GrauHam, ALASTAIR 1955. Molluscan diets. 144 -159. HErTLEIN, LEo Georce & ARCHIBALD McC.iure StroNnG 1955. Marine mollusks collected at the Galapagos Islands during the voyage of the Velero III, 1931-32. pp. 111-145 Proc. Malac. Soc. London 31: Vol. 11; No. 2 THE VELIGER Page 97 Table 1 Habitat, depth, and shell length of cowries (Cypraea) from the Pacific and Atlantic Hancock Expeditions ce € £8 i E fe , Se e Oo +l — SI ° ao a¢ 3 Ps g £ ‘ ap SES 2 se Sy a5 Se See BE be De Be >? GB » Qs S28 ao Se isi =o =U = 6 = oO 38 = ae goa oe oe 5 BC 45 ad Ce Seed ie 28 Il 23 pn ae esie 38 ee 3% om ee oS Gs] aS} (G) 36 me} in eo co an au ao ao Cy praea 22+0.14 22etie39 16.41 albuginosa 0-18-93 to 274 15-22-31 3.61 [13] [26] 37+0.65 37 +£1.04 12.03 annettae 0-5-38 25-37-47 4.45 [20] [46] 23 +0.79 23 + 1.20 16.43 arabicula 0- 3-46 to 64 17-23-29 3.78 [18] [38] 69+0.90 69+2.72 10.86 cervinetta O- 1-46 39-69-89 7.49 [28] [29] 2 - - - cinerea shore 21-26-34 - (9 - : = isabellamexicana shore 29-37-43 - [3] [4] 27 +0.88 27+1.75 16.89 " nigropunctata 0- 4-28 to 37 22-27-37 4.56 [14] [26] 22 +0.28 22+2.16 19.41 robertst Q- 4-37 17-22-28 4.27 [8] [15] 45 +0.89 45+1.70 13.22 spadicca 0- 7-91to 93 30-45-57 5.95 [21] 3 [47] - - - Spurca 0 to 44 17-19-25 - (7) S E > teres shallow water 23 and 26 - (I - - - zebra littoral 68 [14 - - - ee 00 Sa——>~"a>«>*>TRa22"— va——= " Caribbean specics 2 AHF 48-33 (immature shell) measures 79 mm in length In: Hatmos, D. (ed.) Essays in the natural sciences in honor of Captain Allan Hancock. Univ. South. Calif. Press, Los Angeles, Calif., pp. 1 - 345 IncRAM, WILLIAM Marcus 1948. The cypracid fauna of the Galapagos Islands. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. 26 (7): 135-145 1951. The living Cypraeidae of the western hemisphere. Bull. Amer. Paleont. 33 (136): 1-55 Keen, A. Myra 1958. Sea shells of tropical West America; marine mollusks i-xi+624 pp.; 10 Stanford Univ. Press, Stan- from Lower California to Colombia. colored plts.; 1700 text figs. ford. Calif. (5 December 1958) Scuitper, Franz ALFRED & MARIA SCHILDER 1966. The size of ninety-five thousand cowries. ‘The Veliger 8 (4): 208-215 (1 April 1966) 3 Two shells (AHF 2049-51) were collected from a mud bottom at a depth of 604m in San Pedro Channel, southern California 4 An immature shell (Mattox 88) mcasures 74mm in length SCHILDER, Marta, & FRANZ ALFRED SCHILDER 1938 - 1939. Prodrome of a monograph on living Cypraeidae. Proc. Malacol. Soc. London, 23(3- 4): 119 - 231. Suasky, Donatp R. 1961. Range extension for Cypraea (Luria) isabellamexicana Stearns, 1893. The Vecliger 3 (4): 111-112 (1 Apr. ’61) Simpson, Grorcr GAYLorp, ANNE Rowe & RicHarp C. LEwontIN 1963. Quantitative Zoology. i-vii + 440 pp. New York, N. Y. (Harcourt, Brace & World) Smirn, ALLyN GoopWwIN 1962. California brown cowrie in central California. The Veliger 4 (4): 215 (1 April 1962) WarMkr, GERMAINE L. « RoBpertT TucKER ABBOTT 1961. Caribbean seashells; a guide to the marine mollusks of Puerto Rico and other West Indian islands, Bermuda and the lower Florida Keys. x+346 pp.; 44 plts.; 34 text figs. Narberth, Pennsylvania (Livingston Publ. Co.) Page 98 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 2 An Additional Record for Cypraea teres in the Galapagos Islands BY WILLIAM K. EMERSON AND WILLIAM E. OLD, Jr. Department of Living Invertebrates American Museum of Natural History Seventy-ninth Street and Central Park West, New York, New York 10024 (Plate 12) IN A PREVIOUS PAPER on the marine mollusks of the Galapagos Islands (EMERSON & OLD, 1965), we reported the first records for the Indo-Pacific species, Cypraea (Ta- lostolida) teres GMELIN, 1791, in these islands. One large, nearly complete, beach specimen (A.M.N.H. No. 110483) had been obtained at Puerto Grande, Isla San Cristobal (not Isla San Salvador, as we erroneously stated). A second dead specimen, which was mentioned in our report, is now known to have been found by Mrs. Jacque- line De Roy in a fathom of water in Academy Bay, Isla Santa Cruz. A third specimen has since been found by Mrs. Carmen Angermeyer. It is a glossy, fresh, dead-collected specimen obtained at Sombrero, Isla San Salvador at a depth of 2 fathoms (Plate 12, Figures 7 to 9). This specimen, which is in the Angermeyer collection, is the largest ex- ample of this species that we have seen, having a length of 50mm and a height of 22.7 mm. The specimen from Puerto Grande, although not complete, measures 46.2 mm in length and 20.7 mm in height. The largest example of this species recorded by ScHILDER & SCHILDER (1964, p. 8) is a specimen in the British Museum (Natural History) measuring 45 mm in length. No locality was cited for it. Dr. E. Alison Kay kindly examined our Galapagan specimens and she confirmed our identification. She com- mented (7n litteris) that the specimen from Isla San Sal- vador was the largest that she had seen with the possible exception of a large fragment representing the dorsal part of a shell that was dredged off Kihei Lagoon, Maui, Hawaiian Islands, which is in the collection of Dr. C. M. Burgess. According to Dr. Kay, the fragment fits over the dorsum of the largest Galapagan specimen, and she con- cludes that the Hawaiian specimen must have been nearly 50mm in length. She pointed out, however, that all other specimens she has seen from the Hawaiian Archi- pelago, including Midway Island, do not exceed a maxi- mum of 35mm in length. We have found the larger Galapagan specimen to be about 10 mm greater in length than the largest specimen with data in the 50 lots from throughout the Indo-Pacific region contained in the col- lection of the American Museum. In this widely ranging Indo- Pacific species, the shells exhibit two distinct forms that apparently represent sexu- al dimorphism. In the larger inflated form, presumably the female, a maximum length of about 36 mm is most commonly encountered. The smaller, less globose shells of the apparent males, rarely attain a maximum length greater than 30 mm. A similar dimorphic condition exists in the population occurring at Clipperton Island, the only other record for this species in the eastern Pacific. The Explanation of Plate 12 Figures 1 to 3: Cypraea (Talostolida) teres pellucens MELVILL, 1888, Secas Island, Panama, 7°57’10” N, 82°00'45”W, shallow water, coral, 1935 (A. H.E 447-35; Frazer, 1943) ; K 1B Figures 4 to 6: Cypraea (Talostolida) teres pellucens MELVILL, 1888, off Fort Kamehameha, Oahu, Hawaii, shallow water, C. M. Bur- gess coll. (A. M.N.H. 91898, ex-Burgess) ; X 1.3 Figures 7 to 9: Cypraea (Talostolida) teres GMELIN, 1791 (s. l.), off Sombrero, Isla San Salvador [James Island], Galapagos Islands, in 1 fm, Angermeyer collection; XI THE VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 2 [EMERSON & OLD] Plate 12 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 7 Figure 8 Figure 9 Seige 7“ es if : > any) - - = : 4 mt = f o oe is D . i f a \ ey , © VW aia “i “ 7 Vol. 11; No. 2 THE VELIGER Page 99 largest specimen we have seen from this oceanic island is 35mm in length, and these specimens are typical of examples from populations occurring in the Hawaiian Archipelago and Central Pacific that have been recog- nized as a subspecies, Cypraea (Talostolida) teres pellu- cens MeEtvitt, 1888. A specimen from Oahu, Hawaii (A. M.N.H. No. 91898; ex Burgess) is illustrated for comparison (see Plate 12, Figures 4 to 6). As one might expect giant specimens to occur in iso- lated, peripheral areas of a widely ranging species, we believe, on the basis of our limited Galapagan sample, that it is prudent to consider these insular specimens a large growth form of Cypraca teres s.1. that does not merit subspecific recognition. Additional collecting may demonstrate, however, that the Galapagan population is unique. ADDENDUM After the text for this manuscript was completed, Bakus (1968, p. 94, this issue) cited specimens of Cypraea teres from west Panama, the first known records for this taxon on the continental shelf of the New World. These specimens, one from Secas Island and one from Bahia Honda in the Gulf of Panama, were obtained by the Allan Hancock Pacific Expeditions more than 30 years ago. Through the courtesy of Drs. Gerald J. Bakus and James H. McLean these specimens were examined by us, and they were found to be the small, narrow form, pre- sumably males. The specimens appear to be referable to the subspecies Cypraca (Talostolida) teres pellucens MEL- VILL, which is known to occur in the eastern Pacific at Clipperton Island. The Panamanian specimens were col- lected alive in association with stony corals, apparently the same habitat occupied by this species at Clipperton Is- land (HERTLEIN & ALtison, 1960). The larger of the 2 Panamanian specimens, which is nearly an inch less in length than the largest of the Galapagan specimens, is here illustrated (Plate 12, Figures 1 to 3). The smaller specimen from Panama (A.H.F. Station 247-34; Fra- SER, 1943), measures 22.7 mm in length, 12.3 mm in width, and 9.5 mm in height; it is a more mature indi- vidual than the larger, figured specimen. The discovery of this Indo-Pacific species in the Gulf of Panama, although belatedly recorded, serves to de- monstrate once again our limited knowledge of the faunas associated with the isolated coral reefs occurring in the southern part of the Panamic Province (EMERSON, 1967). Additional specimens of this species complex are required from the eastern Pacific in order to compare them with populations from the Hawaiian Archipelago and the western Polynesian islands before the taxonomic significance of the large Galapagan specimens can be determined more critically. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS In addition to Mesdames Carmen Angermeyer and Jacqueline De Roy of Academy Bay, Isla Santa Cruz, Galapagos Islands, we are indebted to the following individuals for courtesies of various kinds: Dr. E. Alison Kay of the University of Hawaii, Honolulu and Dr. C. M. Burgess of Honolulu, Hawaii; Dr. James H. McLean of the Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History, Los Angeles, and Dr. Gerald J. Bakus of the Allan Han- cock Foundation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California. LITERATURE CITED Bakus, GERALD JOSEPH 1968. Quantitative studies on cowries (Cypraeidae) of the Allan Hancock Foundation Collections. The Veliger, 11 (2): 93-96 (1 October 1968) EMERSON, WILLIAM KEITH 1967. Indo-Pacific faunal elements in the tropical eastern Pacific, with special reference to the mollusks. Venus 25 (3, 4): 85-93; 1 fig. Emerson, WILLIAM KeiTrH & WILLIAM ERwoop OLDp, Jr. 1965. | New molluscan records for the Galapagos Islands. The Nautilus 78 (4): 116 - 120 Fraser, C. McLEAN 1943. General account of the scientific work of the Velero III in the eastern Pacific, 1931-41. Part III. A ten-year list of the Velero III collecting stations (charts 1-115). Allan Hancock Pacif. Exped. 1 (3): 259 - 431. Univ. So. Calif. Press, Los Angeles, California GMELIN, JOHANN FRIEDRICH 1791. Caroli Linnaei systema naturae per regna tria naturae. Ed. 13, aucta, reformata, Vermes Testacea Lipsiae 1 (6). HERTLEIN, LEo GeorcE & Epwin C. ALLISON 1960. Species of the genus Cypraea from Clipperton Island. The Veliger 2 (4): 94-95; plt. 22 (1 April 1960) MELviILL, James Cosmo 1888. A survey of the genus Cypraea (Linn.), its nomencla- ture, geographical distribution, and distinctive affinities; with descriptions of two new species and several varietics. Mem. & Proc. Manchester Literary & Philosoph. Soc., Ser. 4, 1: 184 - 252; plts. 1, 2 ScHILDER, MartA & FRANZ ALFRED SCHILDER Hawaiian (October 1964) 1964. Minima and Maxima in cowry shells. Shell News 12 (12): 6-8 Page 100 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 2 The Egg Masses and Veligers of Southern California Sacoglossan Opisthobranchs RICHARD W. GREENE Department of Zoology, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90024 (6 Text figures) INTRODUCTION Hurst (1967) HAS DEMONSTRATED the importance of egg masses and veliger larvae to the systematics of north- east Pacific opisthobranchs. The present paper deals with the order Sacoglossa as an addition to the work of Hurst, and as a contribution to our knowledge of this group. Horst (op. cit.) has described the egg mass and veliger of Olea hansineensis AcERSBoRG, 1923 (Sacoglossa: Oleidae). A brief description of the egg mass of Her- maeina smithi Marcus, 1961 has been given by Gonor (1961), and Lance (1962) has given a short description of egg masses of Stiliger fuscovittata LANCE, 1962 (both Sacoglossa: Hermaeidae). The animals included in the present study are Elysia hedgpetht Marcus, 1961 (Elysiidae), Hermaeca dend- ritica ALDER & Hancock, 1846 and Hermaeina smithi (Hermaeidae). All three species were collected intertid- ally in Los Angeles County, California. In order to make the data more useful, the methods used by Hurst (1967) for description of egg masses and veligers have been applied. EGG MASSES All the egg masses described in this paper belong to the Type B of Hurst (1967). They are more or less cylindri- cal in cross-section through the individual egg bands. When attached to a flat substrate, the masses possess a very thin jelly-free layer, while those found tangled among filamentous algae (i. e., Chaetomorpha) have no appar- ent jelly-free layer. Elysia hedgpethi (Text figure 1; Tables 1 and 2): The egg mass of Elysia hedgpethi (Figure 1) is in the form of a counter-clockwise spiral. The mass is invariably attached along its entire length to the substrate. In the field the eggs are laid among the fronds of Codium fragile Harior, 1889, the alga upon which the animal lives and feeds. Individual masses of eggs may range between 4 and 6mm in diameter. The egg band itself measures between 1 and 2 mm in width depending upon the size of the spawning animal. The terminal portion of the egg band sometimes encloses several capsules con- taining no ova. A single ovum is found in each capsule. The entire egg mass is white in color, and the eggs within the band appear randomly distributed in space. Figure 1 Egg mass of Elysia hedgpethi The pattern of spawning and structure of the egg mass of Elysta hedgpethi closely resembles that of E. maoria Powe LL, 1937 from New Zealand (Rem, 1964). Hermaca dendritica (Text figure 2; Tables 1 and 2): This species lays an egg mass very similar to that of Elysia hedgpetht. The mass is in the form of a counter- clockwise spiral and is found in the field attached to the fronds of Codium fragile. When kept in captivity, Her- maea may lay thread-like masses along the glass sides of the container. The egg mass of H. dendritica is white and is attached to the substrate along its entire length (Figure 2). The eggs are deposited in a spiral within the egg mass which serves to distinguish the egg mass of H. dendritica from that of E. hedgpethi, which is found on the same alga species. Vol. 11; No. 2 THE VELIGER Page 101 Table 1 Characteristics of the Egg Masses of Sacoglossans = on a G, 8 &q Bs 5 os § 2 o 4 u af 3 5 8 ts} wn 9 Ss on n qo) iS bo s a a a (@) = 3 Q & on io) : : & 2 as) e Ga 8 5s Le} ww o = : g Sell Pom mies 1a a a 8 = a & 2 ° i=} 2 o o Oo a & 3 ae} (eS) egg g ee oe fee Ss VA & © @ 2 ee =e < ils 7-8 5 Hermaeina smithi X xX average of greatest diameter < average of least diameter (1967) discussed at length the difficulties of orienting veliger shells for measurement. Table 1 gives data on development of the egg masses, and Table 3 gives meas- urement data and length: width: depth ratios for the veliger shells. Elysia hedgpetht (Text figure 4; Tables 1 and 3): The veliger shell of Elysta hedgpethi resembles that of both other species in the present study in that the only apparent sculpture consists of minute pits over the entire surface of the shell which are visible only under 150 magnification. The lip around the aperture is somewhat variable in that the anterior portion may project beyond the rest of the lip (Figure 4a) or may be even with it. In general, the gross shape of the shell seems to be of major importance when comparing it with other species (i. e., Figures 5 and 6). Hermaea dendritica (Text figure 5; Tables 1 and 3): Of the species considered in the present study, Her- maca dendritica has the roundest of the shells examined. In addition, Figure 5 shows that the posterior portion of the shell is narrower than the anterior portion, and that there is little evidence of coiling externally (Figure 5a). Sculpture consists of small pits as in the other two species. Hermacina smithi (Text figure 6; Tables 1 and 3): The apertural lip on the veliger is commonly flared, though not all shells examined had this appearance (Fig- ure 6). Sculpturing is manifested once again by small pits over the surface of the veliger shell. Of the three species included in the present study, Hermaeina smithi shows the greatest degree of coiling on the right side. DISCUSSION The usefulness of data on opisthobranch egg masses and veliger larvae has been pointed out by Hurst (1967) along with the problems of obtaining such data. THomp- son (1961) discussed the importance of veliger shells in the classification of sacoglossans. Vol. 11; No. 2 THE VELIGER Page 103 Table 3 Veliger Shell Dimensions a qe) 3 B g me (e) Length Width Depth Ratio L:W:D Elysia hedgpethi 10 105. +206 66.1p +11.2 Usp, =) Bpil 1e5f2)-3 ih 3 ily) Hermaea dendritica 10 97n +15.0 65.54 + 8.2 Wiley, se Mil 1.48: 1: 1.09 Hermaeina smithi 10 1092 + 1.7 69.54 + 3.6 ey, se Gsil eay7/,S ilo jlale Figure 5 Veliger Shell of Hermaca dendritica a — right side b — left side c — ventral d —- dorsal The egg masses of sacoglossans may be distinguished not only by their gross form and positioning of egg cap- sules, but also to a great extent by where they are found in the field. Sacoglossan opisthobranchs are found in specific habitats such as fronds of algae and generally leave their eggs on the algal substrate. Thus, eggs of Elysia hedgpethi and Hermaea dendritica are found on the fronds of Codium fragile, while egg masses of Her- maeina smithi are found among the filaments of Chaeto- morpha acrea, or, as reported by Gonor (1961), among the various algae in the Enteromorpha mat. LANCE (1962) shows an egg mass of Stiliger fuscovittata attached to Polysiphonia pacifica HoLtenBerc, 1942, the alga upon which the animal feeds. It is interesting to note that the three species of saco- glossans considered all maintain a symbiotic relationship Figure 6 Veliger Shell of Hermaeina smithi b — left side c — ventral d - dorsal a — right side Page 104 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 2 with the chloroplasts of their algal substrate (GREENE, in preparation). The chloroplasts are obtained during feeding and are retained within the cells of the digestive diverticula in a functional condition. The egg masses have been examined for evidence of transmission of chloro- plasts from one generation to the next, and the results are negative. The chloroplast symbionts are apparently not obtained until some time after settling and metamorphosis of the veligers. The veliger shells of the species described here are distinguishable by their gross form and dimensions. The shells of all three species are small compared with most of those described by Hurst (1967). The egg masses and veliger shells described here correspond well with those described for sacoglossans in other parts of the Pacific Ocean (OsTERGAARD, 1950; Rem, 1964). ACKNOWLEDGMENT The author wishes to express gratitude to Dr. Leonard Muscatine of the Department of Zoology, University of California at Los Angeles for his critical reading of the manuscript and to James R. Lance for confirmation of identifications of species used in the study. LITERATURE CITED Gonor, JEFFERSON J. 1961. Observations on the biology of Hermaeina smithi, a sacoglossan opisthobranch from the west coast of North Amer- ica. The Veliger 4 (2): 85-98; 13 text figs. (1 Oct. ’61) Hurst, ANNE 1967. The egg masses and veligers of thirty Northeast Pacific opisthobranchs. The Veliger 9 (3) : 255 - 288; plts. 26 - 38; 31 text figs. (1 January 1967) LaNncE, JAMES RoBERT 1962. No. 2 THE VELIGER Page 115 Map 4: Anterior Spots Map 5: Basal Color Page 116 and Tonga): this arrangement recalls that observed in other cowrie species too (KE A. ScurLper, 1961, 1962). The largest populations live along the Queensland coast from Mackay to Moreton Bay, while the shells collected at the offshore islands become smaller by increasing distance (see also F A. & M. Scuitper, 1964; M. « F A. ScHILper, 1967). Map 2: Breadth (BL). Mostly narrow populations live in the area between Bali, Solomon Islands, Japan, and Thailand; the western populations ranging from Ceylon to Java are mostly broader, as well as the southern popu- lations from West Australia to Fiji. It is curious that the shells coming from the Keppel Bay Islands are narrower than those from the opposite mainland coast as well as those from the Capricorn Islands farther away from the shore. Map 3: Dorsal blotch (DB). In the great central area from the Andaman Islands to New Caledonia popula- tions with rather large blotches are mixed with those with reduced blotches; in the farthest West (Ceylon) and the farthest East (Fiji, Tonga) the dorsal blotch is mostly small to absent, as it seems to be in Micronesia also, whereas in the South (i.e. both regions of Aus- tralia) the blotches usually are large. Map 4: Anterior spots (AS). In West Australia the terminal spots are mostly absent, and in East Australia they are small, as well as from the Admiralty Islands to Fiji and Micronesia; in the central zone, i.e. in Tonga and New Caledonia as well as from western New Guinea to Ceylon, these spots are usually well developed to large, though sporadic populations with reduced spots may occur, especially in the Andaman Islands. Map 5: Basal color (BC). In the populations living in a central zone from Java to the Solomon Islands the base is whitish; this zone may extend northward to Thai- land and Japan with few darker populations scattered among many pale ones. In the South from West Australia to Fiji and in the West from Ceylon to Singapore yellow populations are prevalent. One will observe that in all characters discussed there are widely regional differences in the predominant classes. One could surmise that there is usually a rather equatorial central zone differing from peripheral regions especially in the West and South, and less markedly also in the East and North: so one could summarize the predominant characters as follows: Central Zone Peripheral Regions L small large BL narrow broad DB various N, W, E: small S: large AS large reduced BC whitish yellowish However, there is no parallelism between the bound- THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 2 aries of the regions, because the border lines of the pre- dominant classes of each character cross each other in various ways. Therefore no distinct geographical races can be established by the sum of several characters (EF A. & M. Scuiwp_er, 1961, p. 305). Nevertheless, in some restricted areas all or most popu- lations agree in several characters which fact may be explained by a common gene pool influenced by selection in similar environments. Besides, one will observe that in small islands off-shore, as Dampier Archipelago, Capricorn Islands, Whitsunday Islands, Green Island, Mondoure outer reef, Manava Island, Edam Island, the shells are smaller, narrower, with less developed anterior spots and paler base than in the adjacent coastal populations. LITERATURE CITED SCHILDER, FRANZ ALFRED 1961. _A statistical study in cowries: the size of Mauritia ara- bica (LINNAEUS). The Veliger 4 (1): 15-17; 2 text figs. (1 July 1961) 1962. ‘The size of Cypraca tigris LINNAEUS. The Cowry 1 (3): 43-44 (1 February 1962) 1965. The geographical distribution of cowries. The Veliger 7 (3): 171-183; figs. 1-3 1968a. An interesting mutation in cowries. News (n.s.) 98: 5; 1 fig. (1 January 1965) Hawaiian Shell (February 1968) 1968b. Zur Kenntnis der Cypraeidae: 13. Eine Mutation von Erronea errones (LINNAEUS). Arch. Molluskenk. 97: (in press) SCHILDER, FRANZ ALFRED, & MARIA SCHILDER 1938. Prodrome of a monograph on living Cypraeidae. Proc. Malacol. Soc. London 23 (3/4): 119 - 231; 1 fig.; 9 maps (15 November 1938 and 15 March, 1939) 1961. Zur Variabilitat der Zeichnungselemente bei Porzellan- schnecken (Cypraeidae) . Zool. Anz. 167 (7/8) : 303 - 309; 2 diagrams 1964. Latitudinal differences in size of East Australian cowries. The Cowry 1 (7): 100 - 101 (1 November 1964) ScHILDER, FRANZ ALFRED, Maria SCHILDER & GARFIELD Houston 1964. The cowrie fauna of Penrith Island. The Veliger 6 (3): 155 - 161; 4 tables; 1 text fig. (1 January 1964) ScHILDER, Maria 1967. Length, breadth, and dentition in living cowries. The Veliger 9 (4) : 369 - 376; 1 diagram (1 April 1967) ScHILDER, Marta & FRANZ ALFRED SCHILDER 1967. Studies on East Australian cowries. 10 (2): 103 - 110; 9 tables The Veliger (1 October 1967) Vol. 11; No. 2 THE VELIGER Page 117 A New WNeptunea from the Pacific Northwest ALLYN G. SMITH Associate Curator Department of Invertebrate Zoology, California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, California 94118 (Plate 14) For MANY YEARS the operations of commercial trawlers along the west coast of North America, particularly off central and northern California and the Pacific North- west, have been restricted to moderate depths generally not exceeding 100 fathoms and usually in the range of 50 to 75 fathoms. In the last ten years, however, due to offshore fisheries investigations by the California Division of Fish and Game and similar organizations, excellent table fish, such as sole and sablefish (black cod), have been discovered in commercial quantities in much deeper water. As a result, trawler captains have been lengthening their lines and making successful hauls on new fishing grounds at depths ranging from 100 fathoms to 400 fath- oms with the possibility of increasing the range to as deep as 500 fathoms. These deeper-water trawl hauls started early in 1948, when two otter-trawl captains worked their nets in 200 fathoms off the northern Cali- fornia coast and continued to get good results in the 185 to 215 fathom range (Hotmperc, 1948; ScorieLp, 1948). To conchologists fortunate enough to enlist the co- operation of trawl fishermen to save some of the deeper- water mollusks brought up in their nets instead of throw- ing them back overboard as they usually do, some of the deeper hauls have turned out to be veritable bonan- zas. The larger carnivorous mollusks, such as Neptunea and Beringius, have been turning up more frequently and this has been true also for many smaller species. Among other mollusks obtained from trawler captains in the last several years by Mr. Everett C. Stiles of Bellingham, Washington, is a new species of Neptunea taken sparingly in an area from Cape Flattery, Washing- ton, north to Cape Scott at the northern end of Vancouver Island, British Columbia. Neptunea stilesi A. G. Smitu, spec. nov. (Plate 14, Figures 1 to 7) General Diagnosis: This Neptunea is of medium size for the genus and is distinguished mainly by its much shorter spire compared with other Northwest Pacific species, such as Neptunea pribiloffensis (Dati, 1919), N. phoenicea (Dati, 1891), and N. lyrata (GMELIN, 1791). In general shape it is closer to N. beringiana (Mippenvorrr, 1848), which has a smaller, somewhat heavier shell and a geographical range much farther to the north. It has a capacious bodywhorl with an unflared lip when adult, and a short canal. In color it is off-white to beige or yellowish and occasionally a reddish-brown. Major sculpture consists of widely-spaced, moderate to heavy, rounded spiral chords or ribs, which are usually darker in color than the ground-color of the shell. Description of the Holotype: Shell from an adult living specimen with operculum, of short fusiform shape with a relatively short spire, a large, evenly-rounded, tumid bodywhorl that terminates in a capacious aperture, and a short canal bent slightly to the left and rather sharply to the rear. Divergence of spire (apical angle) approx- imately 87°. Nuclear whorls damaged at the tip, about 2 remaining, nearly straight-sided, with a small channel near the suture and a low chord below it, otherwise smooth. Postnuclear whorls 44, rounded, and decorated with a series of evenly-spaced, low, rounded, spiral ribs of which there are 14 on the bodywhorl and 3 each on the preceding postnuclear whorls, with a fourth showing near the suture at the base of the penultimate whorl; uppermost rib weak, the remaining are stronger. The spacing of the spiral ribs becomes gradually wider with the growth of the shell, being 5 to 9 mm apart near their terminations at the peristome. Spaces between the spiral ribs slightly concave and decorated with from 2 to 4 fine spiral chords. Transverse sculpture consists of many, closely-spaced, rather rough lines of growth, overridden by the fine intercalated spiral chords; it is much roughened on the canal. Sutures distinct and slightly channeled; below them the tops of the whorls are slightly flexed, forming a shallow, encircling channel. Outer lip fairly thick, blunt-edged, unflared, somewhat crenulated by the major spiral chords, with a small notch at its anterior terminus with the bodywhorl. Inner lip a smooth wash of callus only. Columella sinuate, terminating on Page 118 THE VELIGER Vol) Hie Now2 the canal in a well-marked siphonal fasciole that extends to the tip of the canal. Color of shell cream-white, the major spiral chords a contrasting red-brown. Aperture white, porcellaneous. Operculum heavy, normal for the genus. Periostracum lacking. Measurements are: length, 93.9; maximum diameter, 64.9; length of aperture (including canal), 71.5; width of aperture, 31.8; length of canal, about 20 mm. Type Locality and Range: Because of lack of accurate data, no specific type locality can be pinpointed. Most specimens received for study were trawled in depths of approximately 100 to 125 fathoms in the area bounded, in general, on the south by La Perouse Bank, 40 miles west of Cape Flattery, Washington, and on the north by Cape Scott at the northern tip of Vancouver Island, British Columbia. A single specimen was dredged in 34 fathoms, Hakai Pass, British Columbia, by Dr. I. McT: Cowan of the University of British Columbia (UBC No. 1540). Another halfgrown shell was also taken by Dr. Cowan in about 85 fathoms, Queen Charlotte Sound, just north of Cape Scott. An old, dead adult specimen in the Stanford University Collection (Department of Geo- logy) was dredged in 110 fathoms, Virago Sound, British Columbia. Disposition of Specimens: Holotype deposited in the California Academy of Sciences, Geology Type Collec- tion, no. 13124. Twenty-eight paratype shells have been placed in several institutions, including the California Academy of Sciences, Stanford University, the University of British Columbia, Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History, United States National Museum, and the Academy of Sciences of the U.S. S. R. (Leningrad) ; and in the private collection of Everett C. Stiles. Pre- served animals of 6 paratypes have been deposited in the California Academy of Sciences, Invertebrate Zoo- logy Type series, nos. 371 to 376, inclusive. Remarks: This fine new species of Neptunea is dedi- cated to Mr. Everett C. Stiles of Bellingham, Washing- ton, whose diligence in enlisting the interest and cooper- ation of several Pacific Northwest trawler captains has resulted in most of the specimens that have been available to date. Although it is found in the same general area and at about the same depths as the heavily-ribbed Ber- ingius eyerdami A. G. SmitH, 1959, it has been taken less frequently and must be rated as a relatively rare species. In the type lot of 29 shells, 23 were obtained alive, 17 with opercula, although in most instances the animals had disintegrated and could not be saved. There is con- siderable variation in this series of shells in size, sculp- ture and color. Size limits are shown by the following measurements: Dimension Largest Smallest Length, over-all 116.1mm 69.5 mm Maximum diameter 72.3mm 48.6mm Length of aperture and canal 78.2mm 544mm Width of aperture 35.3mm 26.4mm Length of canal 26.0 mm 8.3 mm Number of postnuclear whorls 6 De Apical angle 96° Je The most striking sculptural feature is the presence on typical specimens of prominent spiral ribbing of a red- brown color against a cream-white background. This feature is not at all consistent, however. Twenty-eight of the 29 shells can be ranked as follows in terms of the presence and prominence of the spiral ribs or chords: Ribs obsolete or weak 6 Ribs of medium strength J Ribs fairly prominent 15 The shell texture of full-grown adults is only moder- ately heavy; in younger specimens the shell is quite thin and partially translucent. Older shells have a heavy wash of callus on the inner lip, which makes the peritreme complete. There is no tendency for the outer lip to flare with age or senility. While a small anterior notch, though present, is not especially prominent in the holotype, it Explanation of Plate 14 Figure 1: Neptunea stilesi A.G. Smiru, spec. nov. Holotype, Calif. Acad. Sci. Geol. Type coll. no. 13124. Length: 93.9mm; maximum diameter: 64.9mm; apical angle:83°. Apertural view. Figure 2: Same, dorsal view. Figure 3: Enlarged view of the nuclear tip of a subadult paratype from 85 fms, Queen Charlotte Sound, British Columbia. Length (nuclear whorls only) : 5.5mm; maximum diameter: about 3mm; number of nuclear whorls: 24. Figure 4: Paratype. Brownish color-form with subobsolete spiral sculpture. Length: 94.3mm; maximum diameter: 65.8mm; apical angle: 77°. Figure 5: Paratype with well-developed spiral ribs. Length: 106.0 mm; maximum diameter: 71.7mm; apical angle: 92°. Figure 6: Paratype with somewhat weaker spiral ribs having fine intercalaries between them, stronger on the body-whorl. Length: 106.4mmi; maximum diameter: 69.1 mm; apical angle: 78°. Figure 7: Radula of paratype animal, Calif. Acad. Sci. Inv. Zool. Type Series no. 371, slide no. 490. Center section, mounted width: I.I mm. THE VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 2 [A. G. Smiry] Plate 14 ie ie 7 ; | of 7 Hay aa Po Vol. 11; No. 2 is quite deep in other shells and can be considered as a normal character for the species. Two shells in the series have complete nuclear whorls. An enlarged view of one of these is shown in Plate 14, Figure 3. It consists of about 2} smooth whorls with a length of 5.5 mm and a width of about 3 mm. The tip is dome-shaped and folded over on to the second nuclear whorl, which has slightly diverging sides and minutely channeled sutures. This tip broke off during measurement in spite of careful handling; fortunately it could be repaired satisfactorily. This incident developed the fact that while the tip itself was hollow spirally, the be- ginning of the first postnuclear whorl had already been plugged with shelly material as a protective step prepar- atory to the loss of the nuclear tip from erosion or other causes. This illustrates why so few Neptunea shells of this and other species are collected with their nuclear tips intact. The normal color-phase is represented in the holotype (Plate 14, Figures 1, 2), which has relatively prominent spiral ribs. Another color-phase is dark red-brown, oc- curring on 4 shells. Plate 14, Figure 4 shows a smoother form of the latter color although another similar, red- brown shell has relatively heavy spiral ribs marked with a still darker color. A shell with the heaviest, most prominent spiral ribs is shown on Plate 14 in Figure 5, and another with several fine intercalary spirals between the ribs on the upper part of the bodywhorl is shown in Figure 6. The shell apertures are generally pure white inside; however, two have the columella tinted a deep orange-brown with a lighter wash inside the outer lip and in another the entire aperture is colored lavender- pink, edged with white in the vicinity of the peristome. Animal and Radula: Of the 6 specimens with preserved animals, 2 were males and 4 were females. One of each sex had shells with obsolete ribbing; one male and 3 females had shells with more or less prominent spiral ribs. From this, and from the size and general configura- tion of the shells, the possible occurrence of any sexual dimorphism in this species is not evident. The animals (in alcohol) are yellowish-cream color, with occasional black streaks and maculations on the head and foot. The radula (Plate 14, Figure 7) is typically neptuneid. The central tooth is tricuspid, the central cusp being slightly larger than the other two. The major laterals are also tricuspid, the innermost pair being close together and separated by a narrow V-shaped interval, the inner- most cusp being the larger of the two; this pair is separated from the third, narrowly elongate, outer cusp THE VELIGER Page 119 by a broadly U-shaped interval. Radulae from other animals are not basically different from the one illustrated except for the minor differences that might be expected to occur from age, wear, or individual variation. Although the available information is somewhat in- definite at present, the species apparently lives on a fairly soft mud bottom. Its egg-capsules have not been identified as yet. Relationships: Neptunea stilesi has no really close rela- tives. Its short-spired aspect, tumid bodywhorl, and the sculptural characters distinguishes it specifically from other described Neptunea, Recent and fossil. Comparison with living species has been made with the work of Go.ikov (1962, 1963), who has discussed and illustrated those from northern seas in considerable detail; compari- son with fossil species was made on the basis of unpub- lished work of Dr. F Stearns MacNeil, formerly of the United States Geological Survey. Neptunea stilesi approaches the shape and in some instances the type of spiral ribbing of N. beringiana (Mippenporrr, 1848) but the latter has a somewhat smaller-sized, heavier shell and a range extending to the north of the Aleutian chain (Goutkov, 1963, fig. 95). Its relationship with other Neptunea species occurring off the Pacific Northwest coast is less close as all of them have long-spired shells. Of these, N. lyrata (GMELIN, 1791) has heavy spiral keels and a range extending southward into southeast Alaska and northern British Columbia; N. phoenicia (Dat, 1891), from British Co- lumbia and Puget Sound, has a dark-brown shell covered with an olivaceous periostracum and a sculpture of rather fine spirals devoid of prominent ribs; N. pribi- loffensis (Dat, 1919), from the Gulf of Alaska to British Columbia, has more rounded whorls, much deeper su- tures, and more closely-spaced, less prominent spiral sculpture; N. amianta (Dati, 1889) has a smaller, thinner shell, finely lirated spirally but sometimes with fairly strong spiral keels, and a much deeper habitat ranging from 400 to 1000 fathoms; N. smirnia (Datu, 1919), which ranges south off Humboldt Bay, California, has a totally different, larger, smooth, brownish shell with deeper sutures; N. zthia (DALL, 1891) is of the same type as N. smirnia but is much smaller and has been recorded so far with certainty only in Monterey Bay, California, in 200 to 400 fathoms. Possibly Neptunea stiles: could be considered to be an offshoot from N. beringiana stock that has developed in a new, more southerly region under changed ecological conditions but this can hardly be more than pure specu- lation. Page 120 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Thanks are due to the following associates in the Cali- fornia Academy of Sciences: Mr. Dustin D. Chivers for his excellent microscope slide preparations of radulae; Dr. Victor Zullo for photographing the radula slide used on Plate 14; and to Mr. Maurice Giles for photographing the shells and the preparation of the black-and-white prints used for illustrations. LITERATURE CITED Go.tkov, A. N. 1962. New species of gastropods of the genus Neptunea Bot- TEN from the far-eastern seas of the U.S.S.R. (Gastropoda, Prosobranchia) . Acad. Sci. USSR, Trudy, Zool. Inst. 30: 1-10; 2 plts.; 2 maps Moscow/Leningrad [in Russian] 1963. The gastropod mollusks of the genus Neptunea BoLTEN. Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R, Zool. Inst., n.s. no. 85 (Fauna of the U. S.S.R., Mollusks, vol. 5, issue 1): 1-217; plts. 1-28; figs. 1-97 in text Moscow /Leningrad [in Russian] HoLMBERG, Epwin K. 1948. Deep dredging by Eureka otter trawlers. Calif. Fish & Game 34 (4): 218-219 (October 1948) MacNetm., FE STEaRNS 1957. Cenozoic megafossils of northern Alaska. U. S. Geol. Surv. Prof: Paper 294-C: 99 - 126; plts. 11-17 ScoFIE.p, W. L. 1948. Trawling gear in California. Calif. Div. Fish & Game, Fish Bull. 72: 1-60; figs. 1 - 24 Vol. 11; No. 2 THE VELIGER Page 121 An Investigation of the Commensals of Cryptochiton stelleri (MIDDENDORFF, 1846) in the Monterey Peninsula Area, California BY STEVEN K. WEBSTER Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305 (5 Text figures) INTRODUCTION THE GIANT CHITON or THE Pacific Coast, Cryptochiton steller. (Mippenporrr, 1847), occasionally attains a length of 35cm, and often harbors commensals in its pallial grooves. A pea crab, Opisthopus transversus (RaTHBUN, 1893), and a polynoid worm, Arctonoe vit- tata (GruBE, 1855), are frequently found in the pallial grooves of C. stelleri in the Monterey Peninsula area. These grooves, each with a row of about 70 ctenidia, are bordered on the inside by the dorso-lateral edges of the foot and on the outside by the girdle margins. While Arctonoe vittata may be found free-living under rocks, Opisthopus transversus is always found as a com- mensal. Both O. transversus and A. vittata are found as commensals in other hosts. For A. vittata some of these are Solaster, Dermasterias, Pisaster, Henricia, Crossaster (asteroids); Stichopus (a holothurian); Diodora, Acmaea, and Puncturella (gastropods). Opisthopus transversus is also found with Megathura, Aplysia, and Astraea (gas- tropods) ; Mytilus, Tresus, and the siphons of pholads (pelecypods) ; and Stichopus (HARTMAN & Retsu, 1950; Davenport, 1950; Ricketts & Cavin, 1962; BEonpé£, 1968). A more complete list of hosts for O. transversus can be obtained in BEonpé (1968). The primary objective of this investigation was to determine the incidence and distribution of the com- mensals on Cryptochiton in the Monterey Peninsula area. In addition, observations were made concerning the nat- ural history of Cryptochiton, and experiments on the role of diffusible attractants to commensals produced by Cryptochiton were conducted. FIELD METHODS Two subtidal sites were chosen within which dives were made using SCUBA equipment. The two stations were: Cabrillo Point, Monterey Bay (121°54’10” W; 36°37’30” N) and San Jose Beach (121°55’30” W; 36°30’50” N) on more exposed coast 2 miles S of Carmel. Both sites contained granite boulders surrounded by granite gravel and shell fragments. Boulders extended to a depth of 20m at Cabrillo Point and to over 50m at San Jose Beach. These sites were chosen for their accessibility and because they represented contrasting conditions of ex- posure. While the largest number of dives was made between October, 1966 and September, 1967 (20 at each site), several dives were conducted in June and July, 1965. The data from both periods have been included in the discussion. A single dive was made in August, 1965, on the shale beds 4 mile offshore at Del Monte Beach, Monterey Bay. Dives were of about 45 minutes’ duration and involved the use of either rectangular or zig-zag swimming pat- terns in order to avoid repeated encounters with the same chitons. Each chiton was removed from the substrate and turned over to expose the pallial groove. When the chiton began to curl and close the pallial grooves, a finger was inserted in the anterior end of the groove and moved pos- teriorly, exposing the groove and commensals. Specimens which curled so tightly as to preclude thorough examina- tion were not counted. Notes on the numbers of Crypto- chiton and commensals observed were recorded on an underwater slate. The incidence of juvenile Arctonoe (less than 3cm) was recorded separately. Additional obser- Page 122 vations (physical conditions, behavior, etc.) were record- ed shortly after each dive. RESULTS or FIELD WORK Although chitons were observed most frequently on granite boulders, they were occasionally seen on gravel within a meter or so of large boulders. In addition, C’ryp- tochiton was found in both stations on Diapatra ornata (Moore, 1911), a polychaete tube-worm, apparently to browse on red algae found in association with the worm colonies. Cryptochiton stelleri in both sites was distributed more or less uniformly at depths of about 4 to 40m. An occasional aggregation of 3 or 4 specimens was observed. Most of the chitons were between 20 and 35cm long. Young specimens of 12 to 20cm were common in some areas. Smaller individuals were rare but are more common _intertidally. Cryptochitons were observed browsing red and brown algae common to these rocky subtidal areas. Gigartina, Iridaea, small Laminaria, Ulva, and Macrocystis are common foods (TucKER & Giese, 1962). I also found them feeding on Plocamium and various coralline red algae. Although RickETTS & Carvin (1962) mention that feeding occurs primarily at night intertidally, numerous individuals were observed in both subtidal stations feeding actively during daylight hours. 1) Incidence of Commensals on Cryptochiton (Figures 1 to 4) While Arctonoe occurred on Cryptochiton at both San Jose Beach and Cabrillo Point, Opisthopus was found only at Cabrillo Point and on the shale beds opposite Del 100 3 Cabrillo Point 1966-1967 FI San Jose Beach 1966-1967 : 80 Cabrillo Point 1965 8 “6 San Jose Beach 1965 fj S 97 “= $ 60 mire 3 40 S 3 20 ws Figure 1 Numbers adjacent to points on the graph represent the numbers of observations from which the % of incidence of commensals on Cryptochiton was calculated. THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 2 Monte Beach. It appears, therefore, that Opisthopus is confined to Monterey Bay. The incidence of Arctonoe (Figure 1) reached a max- imum of nearly 60% at both stations between October and December. The minimum incidence of 22 to 25% occurred in both stations between May and August. Juvenile Arctonoe were most abundant in August and September (Figure 2), just preceding the period of highest adult incidence. These data indicate that a high yearly turnover rate may be occurring within the Arc- tonoe population. iS) on Cabrillo Point 1966-1967 San Jose Beach 1966-1967 20 % of C. stelleri with commensal A. vittata juveniles (<3 cm long) a S -O'N D JF M "Aes Months Figure 2 Numbers adjacent to points on the graph represent the numbers of observations from which the % of incidence of commensals on Cryptochiton was calculated. The incidence of Opisthopus (Figure 3) fluctuated somewhat throughout the year but was considerably more stable than that of Arctonoe. The incidence of Opisthopus at the Cabrillo Point station averaged be- tween 20 and 40% throughout the year. The incidence of Opisthopus in the shale beds during August, however, was 90%. The occurrence of more than one commensal Opisthopus on a single chiton was common in this area. Two chitons harbored 2 Opisthopus each (both in the same pallial groove), and one chiton contained 3 (2 in one groove, one in the other). The high incidence of Opisthopus might be a result of the abundance of rock- boring clams (Pholadidae), whose siphons may provide space for large numbers of Opzsthopus. Encounters be- tween Opisthopus and potential host chitons seem more likely in this area than at Cabrillo Point where potential Opisthopus hosts are less dense. While C’ryptochiton was often found to harbor 2 or even 3 Opisthopus at one time, chitons were never found to harbor more than one Arctonoe. Several Cryptochitons observed at Cabrillo Point contained both Arctonoe and Vol. 11; No. 2 100 Cabrillo Point 1966-1967 Cabrillo Point 1965 80 % of C. stelleri with commensal O. transversus ‘Sm One Nae Die) hae Me Av Many ay vA Months Figure 3 Numbers adjacent to points on the graph represent the numbers of observations from which the % of incidence of commensals on Cryptochiton was calculated. Opisthopus, one of each in opposite pallial grooves. These combinations were most abundant (18$% inci- dence) in December, coinciding with the period of maximum occurrence of Arctonoe. The incidence of Opisthopus alone is average (31.6%) during December. This appears to be one of the few instances where more than one species of commensal is found at the same time on one host. 25 a Cabrillo Point 1966-1967 & 3 = aS os Q sO es ‘2 8 8 3 & us wN [o} 2 IN SHOMNED IN| 1 ME AN OME AN Months Figure 4 Numbers adjacent to points on the graph represent the numbers of observations from which the % of incidence of commensals on Cryptochiton was calculated. 2) Position and Orientation of Commensals Arctonoe were usually found wholly within and toward the anterior end of the pallial groove, facing anteriorly. THE VELIGER Page 123 The worms were usually clinging to the dorso-lateral surface of the grooves or to the ventral surfaces of the ctenidia. In either case, the worm is upside-down in relation to the Cryptochiton and the substrate. Occasion- ally, Arctonoe was found clinging to the ventral surface of the foot of Cryptochiton, or partially within the groove and partially on the foot. In such cases the worm also faces anteriorly and is upside-down. Opisthopus was always found within the pallial groove, any place throughout its length; they were either upside- down or right-side-up, but always faced the midline of the host. The crabs were often found to have varying amounts of mucus adhering to them, which presumably originates from the pallial mucous tracts on the inner walls of the pallial grooves. Mucus was rarely found adhering to Arctonoe. DISCUSSION By labeling the relationships between Arctonoe, Opistho- pus and C’ryptochiton as commensal ones, it is assumed that the commensals derive some benefit from the host at its expense, without harming it. It is evident that the pallial grooves of the Cryptochiton provide shelter for the commensals that is well protected from wave surge, predators, and desiccation (during rare periods of inter- tidal exposure). The respiratory currents in the pallial grooves also provide the commensal with a nearly con- tinuous supply of sea water containing plankton and bits of detritus, a ready supply of food. Gut analyses of Arctonoe indicated that they are detritus feeders. That they always face the inhalant stream and are never observed crawling on the substrate would seem to support this interpretation. The frequently observed association of Opisthopus with the pallial mucus might indicate that the mucus and its contents serve as food for the crab. Both Arctonoe and Opisthopus produce planktonic larvae. It is possible that the initial contact of these com- mensals with Cryptochiton occurs when they are in the plankton and that they are carried into the pallial grooves via the inhalant respiratory current. Settling and meta- morphosis might then occur within the pallial grooves. It is also possible that both commensals enter the C'rypto- chiton as metamorphosed juveniles or as adults. An un- disturbed Cryptochiton lifts the margin of the girdle both anteriorly and posteriorly to form the inhalant and exhalant openings to the pallial grooves. These raised portions of the girdle would provide easy access for com- mensals. The smallest of the commensal organisms ob- served in Cryptochiton were already adults. Additional study of this question is warranted. Page 124 LABORATORY STUDIES Introduction and Methods The presence of substances which serve as physiological attractants of the host for its commensals has been dem- onstrated by Davenport (1950) and DaveNpoRT & Hicxockx (1951) in the Arctonoe fragilis — Evasterias association. Using an apparatus similar to the one used by these authors, the Arctonoe vittata — Cryptochiton stelleri relationship was investigated for the presence or absence of such an attractant. A Y-shaped tube was con- structed of 1/16 inch plexiglass, with inside dimensions of 24 by 24cm. The stem was 20cm long and the two arms were 10 cm each. Each arm of the Y-tube was con- nected to two plywood tanks each with a volume of one cubic foot. Pinchcocks were installed to control the flow of water from the tanks to each arm of the Y-tube such that water could be directed from either tank to either arm of the tube (Figure 5). Each tank contained sea \Y . By “Point of Choice” Ye Cork “A” Pinch Clamp ty & Stopcock Figure 5 water with a temperature between 15.8 and 17.0° C. Sea water was added to maintain the two tanks at equal levels. Between trials, sea water was run through all tubing. The flow characteristics of the Y-tube were THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 2 checked with dye, indicating that a definite side-to-side concentration gradient occurred at the “point of choice” where water from each arm of the Y-tube converged. A Cryptochiton without commensals was placed in one tank of sea water, while the second tank contained sea water only. The appropriate pinchcocks were opened to allow for flow from the two tanks into opposite arms of the Y-tube. When the stem of the Y-tube was filled, cork “A” was removed and a commensal inserted. The cork was then replaced. The speed of flow was adjusted so as not to wash the commensal backward. Flow of water through the arms of the Y-tube was alternated from one trial to the next. If after 10 minutes the commensal failed to enter either arm of the Y-tube, a failure was recorded but not counted. Entrance of the commensal into the plain sea water arm was counted as “negative.” Movement into the arm containing water from the tank with the Crypto- chiton was considered “positive.” RESULTS Arctonoe Opisthopus Number of trials 45 45 Number of failures 5 1 Number and % of movements into the Cryptochiton arm 34 (85%) 33 (75%) Number and % of movements into sea water arm 6 (15%) Il (25%) P >0.01 0.05 to 0.01 DISCUSSION Two other experiments were performed, for which data are not presented in detail. Both Opisthopus transversus and Arctonoe vittata, or A. vittata - A. pulchra (JouNson, 1897) “intergrades” inhabit the cloacal chamber of Stichopus californicus (Strmeson, 1857), a holothurian common in both sta- tions (Davenport, 1950). An experiment was run in which Stichopus (free of commensals) was substituted for the Cryptochiton and tests made on Arctonoe and Opisthopus collected from the pallial grooves of Crypto- chiton. In 31 trials, a considerably larger number of “failures” occurred with Stichopus than with Crypto- chiton in the previous experiment, and the runs into the two arms of the Y-tube approached randomness. Vol. 11; No. 2 ‘THE VELIGER Page 125 An experiment was conducted with Stichopus califor- nicus in one tank and Cryptochiton stelleri in the other. Arctonoe vittata and Opisthopus transversus collected from Cryptochiton were tested. Thirty trials were made with each commensal. The results were essentially identi- cal with those of the first experiment, with both com- mensals showing a preference for the arm containing water from the tank with Cryptochiton. Although the above data are based on too few trials to be conclusive, I believe the presence of a diffusible chemical serving as an attractant produced by Crypto- chiton stelleri is indicated. It seems possible that Sticho- pus produces a diffusible attractant which operates as such only on commensals previously conditioned to it in their development. Such an adaptation might be entirely independent of genetic factors (DAVENPoRT, 1950). ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author wishes to express his appreciation to Dr. Donaid P. Abbott, Dr. Myra Keen, and Eugene V. Coan for their helpful suggestions in the preparation of the manuscript. The services of George W. Ackerman and Don G. Tennyson as diving companions are also gratefully acknowledged. LITERATURE CITED BEonbE, ANTHON CRAIG 1968. Aplysia vaccaria, a new host for the pinnotherid crab, Opisthopus transversus. The Veliger 10 (4): 375 - 378; 2 text figs. (1 April 1968) DavENPORT, DEMOREST 1950. Studies in the physiology of commensalism. 1. The poly- noid genus, Arctonoe. Biol. Bull. 98 (2): 81-93 Davenport, DEMorEsT & JoHN FE. Hicxock 1952. Studies in the physiology of commensalism. 2. The poly- noid genera Arctonoe and Halosydna. Biol. Bull. 100 (2): 71 - 83 Hartman, Orca & Donatp J. ReIsH 1950. The marine annelids of Oregon. Oregon State Monographs, Studies in Zoology 6: vit 64 pp.; 1 plt.; 3 maps Oregon State College, Corvallis (August 1950) Ricketts, Epwarp FE « Jack Cavin 1962. Between Pacific tides. 34 ed., rev. by J. W. Hepcretu xill+502 pp.; illust. Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, Calif. Tucker, JouHn S. & ArrHuR C. GiEsE 1962. The reproductive cycles of Cryptochiton stelleri (Mi- DENDORFF). Journ. Exper. Zool. 150 (1): 33 - 43 Page 126 Walls WIEUIGER Vol. 11; No. 2 Notes on the Habitat and Anatomy of Fouannetia quillingi from North Carolina Coastal Waters DOUGLAS A. WOLFE Bureau of Commercial Fisheries, Radiobiological Laboratory Beaufort, North Carolina 28516 (Plate 15; 1 Textfigure) Jouannetia quillingi 1S A RARE BIVALVE which I have recently discovered burrowed into pieces of marl and sandstone submerged in coastal waters near Beaufort, North Carolina. Before describing Jowannetia (Pholadop- sis) quillingt (Pholadidae; Jouannetiinae) as a new spe- cies, TURNER (1955) examined (among others) 2 speci- mens collected in 1885 on the Albatross cruises southeast of Cape Fear, North Carolina. The specimens came from depths of 17 and 18 fathoms, but no records were avail- able on whether the specimens were living or dead, or on the substratum in which they were found. Specimens of J. quillingi are rare, and the species has not been reported from elsewhere off North Carolina, even though several faunal surveys have been conducted in the area (CERA- ME-VIVAS & Gray, 1966; Menzies et al., 1966; WELLS, WELLS, & Gray, 1964; Pearse & WiLuiaMs, 1951). The soft parts of this species were heretofore unknown. Throughout 1966 and in early 1967, several boats from Beaufort, North Carolina, regularly trawled for calico scallops in 10 to 15 fathoms just south of Beaufort Inlet and west of Cape Lookout (approximately 34°20-32’ N; 76°35-55' W). The bottom in this area consists mainly of sand and shell fragments, but large pieces of Trent marl, coquina and coral (Siderastea elegans) were encountered occasionally in the trawls. I periodically met the trawlers at the dock to collect specimens from the catch as it was unloaded. On January 23, 1967, I found several large pieces of Trent marl which had been dumped beside the dock after the previous day’s work. Nine dead, but other- wise intact, specimens of Jowannetia quillingi were re- trieved from their tight burrows in one piece (about 10 in. x 7 in. x 24 in.); 2 others in the same rock were dis- carded because they were badly damaged. No more spe- cimens were found in other similar pieces of rock in the same pile. The clams had been out of the water at least 27 hours, but no more than 36 hours; the tissues were still quite moist, but were probably in early stages of decomposition. Seven of the 9 specimens were preserved in 40% methanol containing 0.1 molar Na-CO;; the others were cleaned and dried, one in situ in its burrow (No. 1253; Plate 15, Figure 1 a). Other specimens (about 20 in all) were collected from burrows in similar rocks trawled from the same area on January 17, March 2, March 3, and May 12, 1967 (No. 1544; Plate 15, Figure 1b), but only one of these (No. 1366; March 2, 1967) contained the soft parts; it was preserved as described above. Several small immature specimens were also in- cluded in the March 2 sample. A representative selection of immature and adult specimens, including the one illustrated in Plate 15, Figure 1 b, now is in the collection at the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard Uni- versity. HABITAT anp ECOLOGY Substratum: All specimens of Jouannetia quillingi were burrowed into the tops or sides of pieces of soft rock obtained from depths of 10 to 15 fathoms. The rock usu- ally was marl (limestone) from the Trent Formation, which outcrops at several points along the continental margin of the Carolinas (PEARSE & WitLams, 1951). In one such piece of marl, recent burrows and shells of J. quillingt were found among a concentration of lower Miocene fossil casts of Venus gardneri Kettum. On March 3, 1967, J. quilling: were found in a softer piece of rock (Plate 15, Figure 2), which seemingly consisted of cemented sand grains, more nearly characteristic of the formations of coquina in this area (WELLS & RicH- ARDS, 1962; Menzigs et al., 1966). The shell of J. quil- lingi completely fills the lower part of the burrow, and the callum of the left valve in the adult is loosely cemen- ted against the bottom and sides of the burrow so that Vol. 11; No. 2 THE VELIGER Page 127 only the right valve is free to move (Plate 15, Figure 1). The callum, which is so extensive in the non-burrowing adult, is completely lacking in young burrowing speci- mens. Jouannetia, like other callum-building pholads (Turner, 1954), probably extends its foot through the anterior gape of the shell while burrowing, but when burrowing ceases, the callum is built and the foot is resorbed. The siphons must be extended a few millimeters behind the siphonoplax to reach the narrow (2 to 4mm diameter) aperture of the burrow (Plate 15, Figure 2). The entrances to the burrows are extremely inconspicuous from the outside; the posterior end of the siphonoplax of the entrenched mollusk is generally not visible through the aperture. Jouannetia quillingi’s apparent preference Figure 1 Internal morphology of Jouannetia quilling: A: Specimen collected January 23, 1967, with left valve removed. C: Different B: Same specimen, with left mantle laid back. specimen from same sample, left mantle laid back. collected March 2, left mantle laid back. D: Specimen Explanations of numbers (after TuRNER, 1962) . Anterior adductor muscle . Thickened anterior margin of mantle Mantle Shell . Posterior adductor muscle . Excurrent siphon . Siphonoplax . Siphonal retractor muscle . Incurrent siphon KHSOoOomrgaopre —a— 12. Labial palps 13. Foot 14. Visceral mass (abdominal mass of FiscHeEr, 1860, 1862) 15. Inner demibranch of gill 16. Outer demibranch of gill 18. Closed mantle of adult 19. Edge of calcareous callum 20. Brownish digestive tissue 21. Retracted siphons 22. Cut edge of mantle Page 128 for substrata of soft rock is characteristic of other species of the genus, although the holotype of J. quillingi was reportedly found insubmerged and rotted wood (TuRNER, 955) Associated Mollusks: Principal mollusks found in con- junction with Jouannetia quillingi on and in similar pieces of rock taken in hauls made for calico scallops are listed below: GASTROPODA Vermicularia spirata Puiipri, 1836 Vermicularia knorri (DESHAYES, 1843) PELECYPODA Lithophaga bisulcata (OrBicNy, 1842) Lithophaga aristata (Dittwyn, 1817) Gastrochaena hians GmMeE.in, 1791 Gastrochaena ovata SOWERBY, 1834 Petricola typica (Jonas, 1844) Hiatella arctica (LINNAEUS, 1767) Pododesmus rudis (BropErip, 1834) Diplodonta punctata (Say, 1822) Chama macerophylla GmMeun, 1791 Chama congregata Conrab, 1833 Pseudochama radians (LAMaRCK, 1819) Arca imbricata BruGuizRE, 1789 ANATOMY oF Jouannetia quillingi Three preserved specimens were dissected: two from the January sample and the one collected on March 2. The tissues of the former specimens were very soft and dis- integrated upon extensive probing, and the tissues in the latter were distinguished much more readily. General internal morphology of all 3 specimens is shown in Text figure 1. For convenience, the numbers identifying ana- tomical features are the same, where possible, as those used by TurNeErR (1962). Upon removing the left valve with its overlapping cal- lum, one sees only the adductor muscles and the closed mantle of the organism (Text figure 1 A). The mantle is thickened along the anterior margin and also posteriorly where it joins the siphonal retractor muscles. In the 3 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 2 specimens dissected, the siphons were fixed in different positions, ranging from fully extended (Text figure 1 D) to completely retracted (Text figure 1 B). The siphons are of equal length and are covered with a rather heavy brown periostracal sheath. When the mantle is opened and laid aside (Text fig- ures 1 A to 1 D), the most prominent anatomical feature is the large, white, smooth, rounded body of the retracted siphons (No. 21).When the siphons are fully retracted (Text figure 1 A, 1B), they occupy most of the space en- closed by the mantle and thereby displace the visceral mass anteriorly and dorsally. The visceral mass is differ- entiated into a cream-colored ventral portion (No. 14) and a more dorsal brownish digestive gland which was green- ish in the March 2 specimen (No. 20).The paired labial palps are long and strap-like and lie on either side of the slit-like mouth on the antero-dorsal surface of the cream- colored portion of the visceral mass. The labial palps were overlooked during the dissection of the first 2 specimens because of the condition of the tissues, but I have included them in their proper position in Text figures 1 B and 1 C. The 2 paired demibranchs of the gill are situated mainly dorsal and posterior to the visceral mass and the retrac- ted siphons. The anatomy of Jouannetia quilling: differs somewhat from that of J. cumingi and J. globulosa as illustrated by Fiscuer, 1860, 1862). [FiscHEr’s original drawings are reproduced in part by TurNeER, 1962.] FiscHER pictures the siphons of both J. cwmingi and J. globulosa as being very much shorter than those of J. quillingi, so that the mantle cavity is occupied by only the visceral mass, labial palps, and gills. FiscHeR also does not mention any dif ferentiation of the visceral mass, a feature quite notice- able in my 3 dissections of J. quilling:. According to Tur- NER (1954, 1962), a detailed description of the anatomy of J. cuming: SowErsy is given also in a private publica- tion by Eccrr (1887), but I have been unable to examine this reference. SUMMARY Jouannetia quillingi Turner, 1955, first found off the coast of North Carolina during the Albatross cruises of Explanation of Plate 15 Jouannetia quillingi from 10 to 15 fathoms off Beaufort, North Carolina Figure 1 a: Dorsal view of specimen in situ in shallow burrow in Trent marl. The original entrance of the burrow was destroyed during removal of excess rock. Figure 1 b: View of left valve of deeply embedded specimen. The upper one-half of the burrow has been removed. Figure 2: Typical burrow of Jouannetia quillingi in soft cemented sandstone, sectioned to show the shape and proportions of the burrow. Tue VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 2 [Wo FE] Plate 15 Figure 1b es te. ——>» 1966. Vol. 11; No. 2 THE VELIGER Page 129 1885, has been rediscovered south of Beaufort Inlet in 10 to 15 fathoms. The species lives burrowed into soft marl and sandstone. It seems likely that the rarity ascribed to the species arises at least partly from the seclusion afforded by its inconspicuous burrows in submerged rock. The general internal morphology of the species, hereto- fore unknown, has been described. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Radiobiological Laboratory is supported by a co- operative agreement between the Atomic Energy Com- mission and the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries. Photo- graphs are by Twyla Miner and Curtis Lewis of this laboratory. I thank Dr. Ruth Turner for her comments and suggestions on the manuscript. LITERATURE CITED \ CrraME-Vivas, M. J. « I. E. Gray The distributional pattern of benthic invertebrates of the Continental Shelf off North Carolina. Ecology 47 (2): — > 260 - 270 ; ng ; A) Eccerr, E. 1887. Jouannetia cumingii Sow. baden, pp. 1 - 69; plts. 1-3 Privately published, Wies- FiscHer, PAUL 1860. Etudes sur les pholades. 337-351; plt. 15 1862. Note sur l’animal du Jouannetia cumingi, suivie de la description de deux espéces nouvelles du méme genre. Journ. de Conchyl. 10: 371 - 377; plt. 15 Menzigs, R. J., O.H. Pirxey, B. W. BLackweLpEr, D. DExTER, P Hutine, & L. M. McCLosKeEy 1966. A submerged reef off North Carolina. ges. Hydrobiol. 51 (3): 393 - 431 Pearse, A.S. & L. G. WILLIAMS 1951. The biota of the reefs off the Carolinas. Mitchell Sci. Soc. 67: 133 - 161 Turner, RutH Dixon 1954. The family Pholadidae in the Western Atlantic and Eastern Pacific. Part I — Pholadinae. Johnsonia 3 (33): 1-63; plts. 1 - 34 1955. The family Pholadidae in the Western Atlantic and Eastern Pacific. Part II - Martesiinae, Jouannetiinae and Xylophaginae. Johnsonia 3 (34): 65-160; plts. 35 - 93. 1962. Nettastomella japonica Yokoyama in North America and notes on the Pholadidae. Occas. Pap. Mollusks Harvard Univ. 2 (28): 289 - 308 WELLS, H. W. & H. G. RicHarps 1962. Invertebrate fauna of coquina from the Cape Hatteras region. Journ. Paleont. 36 (3): 586 - 591 WELLS, H. W, M. J. WELts « I. E. Gray 1964. The calico scallop community in North Carolina. Bull. Marine Sci. Gulf Carib. 14 (4): 561 - 593 Journ. de Conchyl. 8: Int. Rev. d. Journ. Elisha Page 130 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 2 Some Observations on the Ecology and Behavior of Lucapinella callomarginata RICHARD L. MILLER Department of Zoology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331 and the Kerckhoff Marine Laboratory, Corona del Mar, California 92625 ' (Plate 16; 1 Text figure) INTRODUCTION McLean (1967) 1n HIS REVISION of the West American species of Lucapinella reported Lucapinella callomarg- inata (Dati, 1871) from the intertidal: “on the under- side of rocks and on pilings near aggregations of Mytilus edulis in bays and channels in southern California. It has not been collected in the sub-littoral zone.” No report other than this exists as to the habitat of this species, nor is there any description of the general biology of this organism. During the late summer of 1967, while dredg- ing in the main channel leading to upper Newport Bay, California, I found 2 L. callomarginata in a radically different niche — the mud-flat sponge Tetilla mutabilis DE LAUBENFELS, 1930. Subsequent collections and labo- ratory observations have served to confirm and extend this finding. COLLECTIONS AND PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS Dredging runs, made parallel to the northern shore of the channel about 300 yards east of the Route 101 bridge in about 10 to 15 feet of water, yielded a large number of Tetilla and 2 limpets were found tightly embedded in one of them. The importance of this find was not realized at the time, so no further search was made for limpets. The 2 limpets were brought back to the laboratory for identification and kept isolated in a running sea-watcr aquarium for 2 weeks before a fresh sponge was pro- vided. The animals moved under the sponge and burrowed up and into it. ‘ Current address: Department of Biology, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122 A second collection was made some weeks later at the same location by raking sponges by hand and a total of 9 limpets was recovered from 15 sponges. In most cases, if one limpet was found in a sponge, others would be present. Three limpets were placed on one of the sponges brought back to the laboratory at this time and it was used for the photographs in Plate 16. A third collection was made at a small marina just east of the bridge, where, at low tide, sponges could be raked by hand in from 3 to 5 feet of water. Both Tetilla and a massive, branched, yellow sponge (tentatively identified as a species of Halichondria) were found, but there were only 3 limpets in about 30 specimens of Tetilla. All of these were found in one sponge. This particular Tetilla was highly irregular in form with 4 large oscula, whereas the vast majority of the others was more regular, with a single central osculum (Plate 16, Figure 5). The Hali- chondria (?) contained no limpets. A fourth collection was made from the pilings under the bridge in an attempt to recover animals in the habitat described by McLean. A single limpet was found here away from any sponge. This animal was brought back to the laboratory alive for analysis of the contents of the fecal pellets. EXTERNAL MORPHOLOGY oF Lucapinella callomarginata Figures 1 to 4, Plate 16, are photographs taken of a representative specimen of Lucapinella callomarginata. Figure 1 is a dorsal view, showing the highly sculptured shell, the fringed mantle, the excurrent siphon set off by an anterior and posterior set of 6 or more large, fleshy papillae, and the massive posterior portion of the foot. Figure 2 shows the same animal from the side. The ante- Vol. 11; No. 2 rior end is to the right in the figure. The fringed mantle extends just over the edge of the shell and down over the foot for a distance of 2 to 4mm. The portion of the mantle shielding the head is considerably broader than the portion that extends over the foot. Each of the mantle papillae on the upper portion of the flap appears to line up with a shell ridge. Many times two anterior portions of the mantle are held up, forming fan-shaped openings on either side of the head at about the position of the tentacles. This can be seen from above in the upper lefthand animal in Figure 4, Plate 16 and is prob- ably used as a method of increasing the incurrent water flow. The excurrent siphon is extendable to at least 5mm above the shell surface at the aperture. An animal with its siphon extended is shown in Plate 16, Figure 6. The shell of this animal has been described (McLean, 1967). Figure 3, Plate 16, shows an animal resting in the lower corner of an aquarium. The lower mantle flap has been lifted, displaying the proboscis, head tentacle, and a line of epipodial tentacles decreasing in size posteriorly. The obvious fold in the foot is not a permanent structure. Figure 4, Plate 16, shows 6 animals found during one of the collecting trips and demonstrates the variability in shell and body color and the differences in spot patterns on the surface of the foot. In general, the over-all color of the flesh is an orange-brown to orange-red. The larger scattered spots on the foot range from darker shades of brown to black. The brown or reddish color tended to fade when the animals were kept away from sponges. FEEDING BEHAVIOR General observations were made of the feeding behavior of Lucapinella callomarginata. The animals appear to attack Tetilla anywhere along the sides but seem to prefer the area around the base where the sponge is attached to the mud (Plate 16, Figure 6). The limpet grazes on the surface and forms a cavity which is eventually enlarged to encompass the entire foot of the animal (Plate 16, Figure 8). The limpet crawls forward, burying itself in the sponge, evidently eating its way through. It may be covered by subsequent growth of the sponge around and over it (Plate 16, Figures 5, 6). As the limpet moves for- ward in the sponge, it creates a groove, one of which was 4 inches long. In 2 cases, limpets were seen to enter the sponge by way of the large osculum and commence feeding while in it. No experiments were done to see if the limpets were attracted to the sponge. The fecal pellets of limpets grazing on Tetilla were col- lected and examined. They contained sponge spicules and unidentifiable debris. Several of the animals were then starved for a few days and presented a number of sponges THE VELIGER Page 131 in isolation to determine if Tetilla was the sole food. In each situation fecal pellets were collected and a search was made for sponge spicules. The types found in the feces were compared with the spicules obtained from the sponge on which the animal was feeding. Text figure 1 summarizes the results when limpcts were exposed to the sponges Tetilla mutabilis, Hymeniacidon synapium DE LAUBENFELS, 1930 (Plate 16, Figure 10) and the speci- men of Halichondria (?) (Plate 16, Figure 9) mentioned earlier. As the figure shows, the limpets attacked all 3 sponges, and in each case the spicules in the feces, though somewhat broken up, matched those of the sponge endo- some. Also shown (G) are the spicules found in the fecal pellets of the one limpet taken from the pilings. This assemblage, not found in any of the 3 sponges tested, is probably a conglomerate. The tylostyle is probably from a sponge in the family Clionidae while the prodiaene may be from the ectosome of Tetilla (pE LAUBENFELS, 1932). Indications are, then, that sponges of the order Demo- spongia are eaten and the limpets do not restrict their diet to a single genus. It is also evident that the limpets can do severe damage to the sponges they attack (Plate 16, Figure 9). Since the limpets are often found in areas away from sponges (MacGinitie, personal communication), it is pos- sible that these animals are grazers as well as predators. During a series of observations of isolated limpets it was noticed that portions of the surfaces of the aquarium had been cleaned of the coating of debris. Eventually, one limpet was observed through the glass wall of an aquarium to be grazing on the surface. In contrast to Tegula or Haliotis, the stroke of the radula was very short, which might be an indication that it is designed more for tearing than for scraping. Confirming evidence of feeding on algae was obtained from the feces of the limpet found on the bridge piling. Fragments of plant material were seen along with the spicules. No diatom tests were noted, though there was much unidentifiable debris present. Although the animals may remain in one Tetilla for a considerable period of time, they must eventually exhaust the resources of their prey and have to find another sponge. Therefore, observations were made on the behav- ior of limpets placed on a soft, sandy-mud substrate. Surprisingly, the animals had little difficulty, making almost as rapid progress as they do on glass. Initially, the anterior portion of the foot is splayed out in front of the animal, forcing itself into the mud. At the same time, the proboscis is extended forward as a narrow tube, sliding on the upper surface of the foot. When it reaches its maximum extension, the tip expands and remains expanded as the proboscis is drawn back Page 132 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 2 on fo) Figure 1 (<— adjacent column) (not to scale) A. Tornote from the endosome of Tetilla mutabilis. The longest spicule seen measured about 33mm in length while the smallest measured 8mm. B. Oxea from the endosome of the yellow sponge thought to be Halichondria. The largest measured 3.2mm in length, 0.8mm in width. C. Style from the endosome of Hymeniacidon synapium (2 views). The largest measured 0.75 mm in length, 165, in width. D. Tornote from the fecal pellets of a specimen of Lucapinella cal- lomarginata fed only on Tetilla mutabilis. This was the only type of spicule found. E. Oxea from the fecal pellets of a specimen of Lucapinella callo- marginata fed only on Halichondria (?). This was the only type of spicule found. F. Style from the fecal pellets of a specimen of Lucapinella callo- marginata fed only on Hymeniacidon synapium. This was the only type of spicule found. G. Representative assemblage of spicules found in the fecal pellets of a specimen of Lucapinella callomarginata collected on a piling in Newport Bay, California. Shown are (from left to right) a prodiaene, a tylostyle (0.15mm length X 4ou width) and an oxea (100p length X 5 width). toward the head. The animal then glides forward. Poster- iorly, the foot is spread out to at least twice the length of those shown in Plate 16, Figure 4, and the active secretion of mucus is in evidence as a trail of compacted mud behind the animal. In this manner, the limpet actively burrows along, though it was not seen to move into the mud above the level of the shell. The mantle flap is maximally lifted in the head tentacle areas and these openings may be pressed posteriorly or even oblit- erated by the mud piling up in front of and beside the animal. The epipodial tentacles are maximally extended. Small masses of sediment particles taken into the mantle cavity are ejected periodically through the excurrent siphon, which is also maximally extended. Explanation of Plate 16 Figure 1: A specimen of Lucapinella callomarginata from above. The smallest scale division is 1 mm. Figure 2: The same animal in side view. Same scale as Figure 1. Figure 3: The same animal from below. The scale is in millimeters. Figure 4: Figure 5: A large specimen of Tetilla mutabilis in the “regular massive’ form. The dish on which the sponge rests measures six inches in diameter. The arrow points to the position of a limpet. Two more limpets are in the sponge but hidden from view. Scale equals 25mm (Figures 6 to 10 on same scale). Figure 6: The same sponge in side view. The long root attachment system is clearly shown. The arrow indicates the position of the Six specimens of Lucapinella callomarginata. limpet. The shell aperture and siphon of the animal are visible. Figure 7: The same view with sponge overgrowth cleared away. Figure 8: The limpet has been pulled out of the sponge. The large cavity left by the foot can be seen, as well as a thin layer of sponge still attached to the foot (arrow). The extended tentacles of the limpet can also be made out. Figure g: The same sponge after three weeks. Four possible centers of regeneration have been created. The two finger-like structures in the foreground are portions of the yellow sponge thought to be a species of Halichondria. Figure 10: A large specimen of Hymeniacidon synapium collected in four feet of water at low tide. THE VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 2 [Mixter] Plate 16 Vol. 11; No. 2 THE VELIGER Page 133 Some observations were also made of the behavior of the animals during spawning. Recently collected animals often spawned within 3 hours after being brought into the laboratory. Some of the animals which had been in the laboratory for a few weeks could be induced to spawn by placing them in a six-inch finger bowl. Evidently the rise in water temperature would trigger spawning. In one case, a number of animals was observed to spawn en masse in a 5-gallon capacity aquarium containing a healthy Tetilla on which they had been feeding. All of the animals appeared on the surface of the sponge close to the osculum prior to spawning. Each animal showed a definite contraction of the foot and uniform compression of the shell down against the foot every 3 to 5 minutes. This was accompanied by a burst of gametes from the excurrent siphon. Spawning lasted approximately 2 hours after which the limpets returned to the interior of the sponge. Some of the fertilized eggs were collected. They were encased in 2 jelly layers, an inner dense one about 100 uw thick, and an outer, less dense one, about 200 u thick. The egg itself was a dull yellow color and 132 p in diameter. Cleavage was not observed. DISCUSSION A number of interesting questions is raised by the finding that Lucapinella callomarginata feeds on the sponge Te- tilla, as well as on other Demospongia. Since no observa- tions were made on the detailed behavior of the limpets as they enter the sponges, the question remains as to the actual use of the foot during this process. It does provide a strong grip on the sponge, as attested to by the dif ficulty of pulling the limpets out of the sponges. In many cases, in fact, removal of the limpet would result in tearing away a layer of sponge that remained attached to the foot (Plate 16, Figure 8). Whether it could provide some leverage to aid the limpet in penetrating the sponge remains to be seen. The use of the foot and proboscis during locomotion in mud is interesting in this regard. There is also the distinct possibility that the limpets rarely, if ever, completely destroy a sponge. Since natural growth rates may far exceed those in the laboratory the sponges in nature might well be growing faster than the limpets can eat them. Sponges are notorious for their sensitivity to laboratory conditions. Although Tetilla seemed to do reasonably well, there is always the possi- bility that some subtle deterioration was taking place that would make the sponges in the laboratory more suscep- tible to predation by the limpets and thus tend to amplify whatever effects the limpets might have in nature. DE LAUBENFELS (1932) recorded two shapes for Tetilla mutabilis, “pedunculate-clavate” and “irregularly mas- sive.” In general, the “clavate” form has a relatively symmetrical shape with a central osculum and is rather small. The largest size observed by p—E LAUBENFELS was 22mm. This is probably the juvenile Tetilla. I have no- ticed that the “massive” form, on the other hand, com- monly appears in two shapes, one “irregular” and the other “regular.” The “irregular” has a low, almost flat outline and bears a number (3 or more, usually) of oscula, about 3 inches apart. This form is much larger than the “pedunculate clavate,” and may be over 12 inches by 9 inches by 3-5 inches when full of water. The “regu- lar massive” form resembles a much enlarged “clavate” form although its outline is more nearly spherical (Plate 16, Figures 5, 6). It bears a central osculum, from which extend, like blunt spokes, 3 or 4 irregular lobes of con- siderable thickness and it may be up to 6 inches or more in diameter. Limpets were rarely found in this form, and the one pictured in Plate 16, Figures 5, 6, 7, and 8 was introduced. It is possible that the “irregular massive” form is produced from the “regular massive” by the predations of the limpets. Plate 16, Figure 9 shows the results of predation by 3 limpets on the “regular massive” sponge shown in Figure 5 aftera period of 3 weeks. This collapsed form could easily give rise to the “irregular massive” form if the limpets left the sponge and regeneration occurred; the lobes of the “regular” form that remained giving rise to secondary centers of organization each with its own osculum. Distribution of Tetilla is erratic in Newport Bay, al- though it is a common species. The few collections of limpets indicate that their distribution may be even more erratic. The largest number taken were in an area where great numbers of Tetilla occurred but too few collections were made in other areas to see if there was any corre- spondence. Locality records in the Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History collections reveal that large numbers of Lucapinella have been taken on the bridge pilings in the past, confirming a lack of restriction to sponges. I have noticed that Tetilla seems to disappear during the late spring or early summer and Dr. Charles Brokaw confirmed this (personal communication). Prof. G. E. MacGinitie stated (personal communication) that the sponge was seen during the months of October, Jan- uary, February, and April. pp LauBENFELS (1932) com- mented that although the sponges were extraordinarily plentiful in November, he could find none in June of that same year. Possibly there is a true seasonal bloom of Tetilla in Newport Bay, but it is doubtful that the distri- Page 134 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 2 bution of the limpet can be correlated with it, considering the prevalence of other edible sponges elsewhere in the bay. Little is known of the feeding behavior of most Fis- surellidae except the common assumption that the rocky intertidal reef-dwellers are surface grazers, foraging on the layers of diatoms and encrusting algae on hard sur- faces. Dr. Jefferson Gonor has observed (personal com- munication), however, that the limpet Diodora aspera (EscHscHoLtz, 1833) will seek out and consume en- crusting bryozoans in preference to algae. FRETTER & Granam (1962) report that D. apertura (Montacu, 1807) utilizes similar food sources. Sponges are common food sources of many opisthobranchs and some, such as Rostanga pulchra MacFartanp, 1905 may have diets restricted to a single species (Coox, 1962). In some cases, the mollusks are definitely attracted by their food (Coox, op. cit.; Lone, 1967; Owen, 1966). No tests were run to determine the attraction of Lucapinella to Tetilla. However, the possibility that the limpets do aggregate in a sponge once it is being attacked cannot be overlooked, since in most collections more than one limpet was usually found in a sponge. Observations on the feeding behavior of Aeolidia indicate that damaged prey becomes more attractive to other Aeolidia (STEHOUWER, 1952). In Melongena, the first feeding organism rather than the prey becomes attractive to other Melongena, which in turn attack the prey (TuRNeR, 1959). Attraction mech- anisms like these are probably of advantage for spawning or mating purposes, and would certainly be of advantage to Lucapinella. Turner, Rutu Dixon ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I should like to thank Dr. Charles Graham at the Kerck- hoff Laboratory for his hospitality during my stay at the jaboratory and Dr. Jefferson J. Gonor for reading the ‘manuscript. LITERATURE CITED Cook, EMILy F. 1962. _A study of food choice of two opisthobranchs, Rostanga pulchra McFartanp and Archidoris montereyensis (Coo- PER). The Veliger 4 (4): 194-196; 4 text figs. (1 April 1962) DELAUBENFELS, Max WALKER 1932. The marine and fresh-water sponges of California. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 82: 1 - 140 FRETTER, VERA & ALASTAIR GRAHAM 1962. British prosobranch molluscs, their functional anatomy and ecology. London, Ray Soc. xvi+755 pp.; 317 figs. Lone, Epwarp 1967. The associates of four species of marine sponges of Washington and Oregon. Thesis, Oregon State Univ. McLean, JAMES HAMILTON 1967. | West American species of Lucapinella. 9 (3): 349-352; plt. 49; 3 text figs. Owen, GaRETH 1966. Feeding. In: Physiology of Mollusca, ed. K. M. WiLBuR &« C.M. Yonce. II: 1-51 STEHOUWER, E. C. 1952. The preference of the slug Aeolidia papillosa (L.) for the sea anemone Metridium senile (L.). Arch. Neéerl. Zool. 10: 161 - 170. The Veliger (1 January 1967) 1959. Notes on the feeding of the slug Melongena corona. The Nautilus 73: 11 - 13 Vol. 11; No. 2 THE VELIGER Page 135 Banding Patterns in Haliotis - II Some Behavioral Considerations and the Effect of Diet on Shell Coloration for Haliotis rufescens, Haliotis corrugata, Haliotis sorensen, and Haltotis assimilis DAVID A. OLSEN Zoology Department, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 ' (Plate 17; 1 Table) INTRODUCTION IN A PREVIOUS PAPER (OLSEN, 1968) I attempted to develop a technique for using the sequence of colored bands in the shells of Haliotis rufescens Swainson, 1822 to trace the seasonal variation in the abundance of Nereo- cystis luetkeana (MERTENS) PosTELs & RuPRECHT, 1840, the primary component in the diet of the abalones in Morro Bay (Cox, 1962). Nereocystis is a large brown alga that floats well off the bottom. Commercial fishermen make it available to the abalones by cutting the stipes while diving and with the propellers of their boats. I mentioned that this technique could be used to study algal abundance in the abalone’s home area and would also be of use to investigators interested in abalone growth rates. In addition, it would be useful in studying seasonal variations in feeding intensity as reported by INo (1943) and later tied in to seasonal temperature fluctuations by SAKAI (1962a). Abalone growth rate is economically important since Haliotis is a widespread genus with some 50 or more species (SORENSEN, 1949) and is important in a number of countries including Japan, Australia, ‘South Africa, Mexico, and the United States of America. Forster (1967) discusses the importance of growth rate data in fisheries investigations. Before the information contained in the banding pat- terns can be used by sublittoral ecologists certain behav- 1 This work was completed while the author was working on the Master of Arts program in the Department of Biological Sci- ences at the University of California at Santa Barbara. The com- puter analysis was supported by University of California Com- mittee on Research grant for computer research no. 5997. ioral information must be considered. The most important aspect to be considered is whether the animals graze the macroalgae in their immediate vicinity or trap food par- ticles which are carried to them by currents and surge. Any attempt to use the banding patterns to study the algal abundance in the abalone’s home area would certainly be unsuccessful if the animals were eating food that was carried to them by the current from a distant point. Haliotis feeding behavior has been reported for a num- ber of species. Cox (1962) says that the red abalone, H. rufescens, feeds by extending its epipodium and capturing pieces of macroalgae that float by in the drift. SivcLair (1963) described the grazing of H. iris kept in aquaria. She also described populations of abalones living in the New Zealand tidepools where there were no algae avail- able for grazing. She hypothesized that the abalones left these pools at night in order to feed, but it seems possible that they feed by trapping algal debris washed into these pools. STEPHENSON (1924) describes the grazing of captive Haliotis tuberculata LINNAEUS, 1758 in England, but also mentions inducing animals in nature to feed by holding a piece of Fucus near the mouth. From these and other studies it appears that although abalones will graze, the normal method of feeding is by capturing particles of macroalgae in the drift. Cox (1962) reported annual growth of Haliotis rufes- cens of up to 48mm but says that it is irregular and varies greatly. LEIGHTON & BooLootiANn (1963) found the annual growth rate of H. cracherodu Lracu, 1817 to be 20mm. In England, Forster (1967) found that H. tuberculata grew 15 to 16mm per year. SaKar (1962 b) Page 136 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 2 found that H. discus hannai Ino, 1953 grew an average of 20mm per year over a 5-year period. Commercial fishermen report annual growth of up to 2 inches (51 mm) but feel that 4 inch (13 mm) is more likely the average figure. It is the purpose of this paper to supply the behavioral information that is necessary before this shell banding in- formation can be used for dating purposes. In addition, I have presented the results of a series of feeding experi- ments which were an extension of the diet and shell color studies of Ino (1952), Saxar (1962a) and LEIGHTON (1961, 1963). A preliminary attempt at taking the yearly patterns of shell colors and utilizing them to group the sample into age classes is also reported. MATERIALS ann METHODS Growth was measured by taking the shell band data described in the previous paper and totalling the distance from one red winter band to (but not including) the next. This was done with a simple program on an IBM 360-50 computer. To study the effects of changes in diet upon shell color, 5 species of abalones were collected by SCUBA divers, brought into the laboratory, placed in 8-liter plastic pans, and maintained at 14 to 20° C in running sea water. I used small individuals because of space limitations and because earlier workers reported a rapid early growth rate. The number of individuals, species, and the size range were as follows: 8 Haliotis rufescens (64 to 153mm), 10 H. sorensent Bartscu, 1940 (64 to 127mm), 4 H. assimilis Dati, 1878 (51 to 102mm), 3 H. corrugata Gray, 1828 (19 to 140mm), and 1 H. cracherodu (33 mm). The animals were fed by placing a liberal quantity of the algae into the tank and leaving it there until it was eaten or until it began to deteriorate. The tanks were cleaned regularly to prevent growth of other species of algae which would contaminate the experiment. The ani- mals were fed one species of alga until there was an obvious area of new shell growth. At this time they were transferred to another condition. They were fed Macro- cystis as a brown alga, Gelidium for red and Entero- morpha for green alga. Behavioral information came from the abalones used in the shell color studies, from a series of simple condi- tioning experiments run predominantly on red abalones, and from 2 years spent as a commercial abalone fisher- man. The behavioral observations were conducted in the following manner: after collection, the abalones were placed in tanks with running sea water; the tanks were 4x4x1 foot in dimension. The abalones were left alone for 3 or 4 days to acclimate themselves. The experiment itself consisted of touching the epipodial, cephalic, and respiratory tentacles with Macrocystis, probes, and in one series, juice from ground Macrocystis. Any change in the behavior of the animal was then recorded. Forty Haliotis rufescens were used in these experiments. RESULTS Annual Growth: There were 361 annual band series (from one red, or winter band, to but not including the next red band) observed in the 45 shells. This gives an average age of the animals used in this study of 8.02 years. There was too much variation in the width of the year bands to group them into well defined year classes. The width of these bands represents one year’s growth and the average was 17.13 mm (S?= 256). The width of these annual bands ranged from 2mm to 146 mm. Shell Color and Diet: The results of the feeding - shell color study are listed below and in Table 1 by species. The colors given are comparable to colors listed in MAERZ & Paut (1950) ; the designations in the atlas are given in parenthesis with each color. Haliotis sorenseni: Red algae in the diet in every case resulted in a deep red color (L-7, p. 36) while brown algae resulted in green-white (G-9, p. 77) or brown-white (1-3, p. 47). The shell color of the Sorensen abalones that were fed green algae was the same green-white as when the animals were fed brown algae. None of the abalones formed blue-grey shell, a color frequently encountered in specimens collected from waters deeper than 15 m. Haliotis rufescens: New shell growth was red (L-7, p. 36) on a red algal diet. When fed brown algae, animals with shells under 85 mm formed new shell of a pale blue-green color (E-4, p. 77), while the larger animals had shells of brown-white (A-1, p. 47). Haliotis corrugata: New shell growth of Haliotis cor- rugata was a brown-red (J-12, p. 36) in every case when Explanation of Plate 17 Figures a to c: Feeding behavior of Haliotis cracherodit. a: Epipodial tentacles are extended into the water in search of food. b: Contact is made with a piece of Macrocystis and the animal extends the foot to capture it. After the food is captured, it is pulled under the foot (c) before the animal commences eating. Figure d: Defensive behavior of Haliotis rufescens. The epipodial tentacles are extended while the shell is clamped down close to the substrate. e — epipodial tentacle; f —- foot; m — piece of Macrocystis frond; r — respiratory tentacle THE VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 2 [OtsEN] Plate 17 Figure 1 b Figure 1 d Vol. 11; No. 2 THE VELIGER Page 137 Table 1 Haliotis Shell Color Under Various Algal Diets Species (sample size) Red algae Haliotis assimilis (4) Brown Algae Green Algae Diatoms red, blue, and white mottled turquoise and white mottled pale brown orange Haliotis corrugata (3) — brown-red turquoise, white Haltotis cracherodit (1) reddish-brown ' blue-black blue-green 2 blue-green ! Halhiotts rufescens (8) red white pale green 3 blue-green 3 pale green 3 olive green 3 Haliotis sorensent (10) red pale green pale green purple ? pale brown Haliotis discus hannai brown 45 bluish green 4 bluish green? bluish green 4 yellowish brown 5 green 5 Haliotis gigantea 5 brown or yellowish-brown green Haliotis steboldu 5 brown or yellowish-brown brown or yellowish-brown ' LEIGHTON, 1963 2 LEIGHTON, personal communication 3 LEIGHTON, 1961 4 Saxat, 19624 5 INO, 1952 fed red algae. When they were fed brown algae 2 of them (one 19 mm and the other 140mm) laid down a vivid turquoise shell (1-3, p. 83) and the other (85 mm) laid down a pure white shell. Haliotis cracherodiu: When fed brown algae this aba- lone laid down the deep blue-black shell described by LeIicHTon, 1963. Haliotis assimilis: Haliotis assimilis was the most vari- able of the species studied. When fed brown algae indi- viduals with a predominantly blue shell laid down a turquoise and white mottled shell; one individual with a large proportion of red mixed with the blue background laid down a brown and white mottled shell, and one small individual (51 mm) with an orange shell continued to lay down the same color when put on a brown algal diet. When fed red algae the 2 animals with blue and white mottled shells laid down shells which were red and white and blue mottled. No results were obtained for red algae from the other H. assimilis. Behavior: The first behavioral action was noticed when the abalones were brought in from the field. At this time they would draw the shell down as close as they could to the substrate and extend their epipodial tentacles as is shown in Plate 17, Figure 1 d. They would wave these tentacles rapidly through the water. If the animal was disturbed further, it would retract the tentacles and clamp the shell down to the substrate. Feeding behavior was similar to that described by Cox, 1962. The animal would raise its shell and extend the cephalic and epipodial tentacles into the water (Plate 17, Figure 1a). When a piece of alga touched one of these tentacles (Plate 17, Figure 1 b), the abalone turned and extended the foot in the direction of the contact. At the same time tentacular waving would increase and con- sequently there was an increased number of contacts be- tween the tentacles and the food. Once the foot made contact with the alga, it pulled the piece under the shell and the animal began eating (Plate 17, Figure Ic). Some abalones held food in this position for 12 hours without eating it. This feeding behavior occurred in all of the species used in the diet - shell color experiments and invariably in the 40 Haliotis rufescens studied. Feed- ing could be stimulated by a variety of stimuli, among them water current and light. A successful attempt at conditioning red abalones was made using light as the stimulus and will be reported in a later paper. Small abalones (40 mm and under) probably do feed primarily by grazing since they are found under rocks and in cracks where drift algac are seldom available. In abalone cultivation efforts they are frequently fed crustose calcareous algae which are found on rocks. Abalones can distinguish the difference between food particles and non- food particles with their tentacles but not with their foot. If a glass probe, a finger or any other non-food substance Page 138 was presented to the tentacles, it would be rejected unless it had been coated with the juice of some food item. If the same substance was presented directly to the foot it would be passed under the foot and the animal would begin to feed upon it with the radula. The epipodial tentacles, followed by the cephalic and respiratory ten- tacles, were the most sensitive to stimulation. All of the species would graze if no other food was presented. DISCUSSION The growth rate of 17.13 mm annual shell increase for Haliotis rufescens is in remarkably good agreement with the yearly figures for other species of Haliotis as reported in the literature. The fact that these shells could not be grouped into year classes can be attributed to the fact that they were all greater than 7? inches (196mm) in length since the California Game Laws forbid the taking of red abalones under this size by commercial fishermen. Year classes might have become evident if there had been a greater size range. The individual variation in growth rate first noted by Cox, 1962, occurred in 5 abalones used in a simple conditioning study. They were fed nearly iden- tical amounts of Macrocystis daily for 160 days and grew 4.7, 6.7, 7.6, 12.2, and 16.8 mm respectively. Shell color of Halotis sorenseni, H. rufescens, H. cor- rugata, and to some extent, H. cracherodu varies with the diet. Red algal diets are recorded in the shells by red shell color. It would be interesting to raise these species on a diet of blue-green algae to see if the similarity in red and blue-green photosynthetic pigments would result in the same red shell color. Anything but red algal diets results in a variable color which is usually a turquoise blue or off-white. Haliotis assimilis presents a more comp- licated situation and the results of this study indicate that although diet plays a role in shell color, there may be some genetic control over the capabilities of the indi- vidual abalone. The genetics of this species would be extremely interesting since there appear to be several easily distinguishable phenotypes. In using the banding patterns of a haliotid species as an indicator of algal abundance, care should be taken to choose a species where the diet effect is readily apparent and not masked by the genetic makeup of the animal. Many characteristics of the feeding behavior are sim- ilar to the escape behavior in Haliotis rufescens and H. assimilis described by MontTcoMEry (1967). It is curious that he has not mentioned the defensive behavior de- scribed in this study. This defensive behavior, with the shell retracted and the tentacles extended to their maxi- mum, appears to allow the abalone to test the environ- THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 2 ment for danger while exposing itself to a minimum of that danger. The marked similarity between the defen- sive behavior and the feeding behavior demonstrates how an animal with a limited behavioral repertoire meets the demands of a complex environment. Abalones held in captivity would graze only when no other food was presented. Normally they fed by finding pieces of algae with their cephalic and epipodial ten- tacles and capturing these algae with their foot. They then pulled a piece under the foot before eating. This is apparently the normal method of feeding as evidenced by the following observations from the commercial fishery. Abalones are normally found clamped on a “scar” on the rocks, a scar which they have grazed to the bare rock. The algae around this scar show no signs of grazing. The second observation is that commercial abalone fishermen normally find a large proportion of their catch with a piece of Macrocystis clamped to the bottom of the foot, even in areas above and below the range of this kelp spe- cies. These pieces could only have been carried to these areas by surge and current. Commercial fishermen also report frequently seeing the abalones raised off the bot- tom, apparently feeding, during the day, although most workers feel that abalones are most active at night. These drift algae are sufficient to support populations of aba- lones since pockets of them are found in healthy condition in areas devoid of algae. It would also account for Cox’s (1962) figure of 540 feet as the lower limit of Haliotis rufescens distribution, although this level is several hun- dred feet below the photic zone given by Dawson (1966). More likely this figure is a misprint of CurTNER’s (1919) figure of 240 feet. This feeding behavior probably resulted in the annual cycle of Nereocystis being recorded in red abalone shells from Morro Bay, California (OLsEN, 1968). The pre- servation of the cycle can probably be regarded as an artifact of the heavy local fishery. The fishermen cause many stipes to sink to the bottom where the abalones can get them. This study has presented some information on the effect of diet on shell color for 3 previously unreported species. This information, along with the observations of feeding behavior, should serve to make the technique of using shell banding patterns in ecological studies more available to investigators from a variety of locales. SUMMARY The annual cycle of the brown alga Nereocystis luetkeana has been recorded as a regular pattern of colored bands in the shells of the red abalone, Haliotis rufescens. A Vol. 11; No. 2 dating system based on this information could be useful to sublittoral ecologists if certain assumptions about ab- alone feeding behavior are satisfied. Abalones feed by trapping particles of macroalgae in the drift instead of by grazing. The effects of variation of the algal diet on the shell color of abalones has been discussed by several authors and is expanded here to include several heretofore unreported species. Growth rates of 45 H. rufescens have been determined by an indirect method and compared to other rates reported in the literature. Haliotis growth rates are markedly similar between species. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank Barbara Johanson for help in pro- gramming, Larry Liddle for moral support and help in caring for the abalones, Chuck Sites for furnishing the abalone shells from Morro Bay, and my wife Susan for typing and other assistance. LITERATURE CITED Cox, Keitu 1962. California abalones, family Haliotidae. & Game Comm., Fish Bull. 118: 1 - 133 Curtn_r, W. W. 1919. Observation of the growth and habits of the red and black abalones. Stanford Univ. Master’s thesis, 21 pp. Calif. Fish Dawson, E. YALE 1966. Marine botany. New York, N. Y. Forster, G. R. 1967. The growth of Haliotis tuberculata: results of tagging experiments in Guernsey 1963-65. Journ. Marine Biol. Assoc. U. K. 47: 287 - 300 Ino, TAKASHI 1943. Ingestion and growth of abalone. Sci. Fisheries 2: 171 - 174 1952. _ Biological studies on the propagation of Japanese aba- lone (genus Haliotis). Tokai Regional Fish. Res. Lab. Bull., Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc. Bull. Japan. Soc. THE VELIGER Page 139 Tokyo, 1953.—English transl., mimeogr. Stanford Univ., Calif., pp. 1-114. LEIGHTON, Davin L. 1961. | Observations on the effect of diet on shell coloration in the red abalone, Haliotis rufescens SwAInson. The Veliger 4 (1): 29-32; plt. 6 (1 July 1961) LeicHTon, Davin L. « R. BooLooTIAN 1963. Diet and growth in the black abalone Haliotis crachero- dit. Ecology 44: 227 - 238 Maerz, Atoys J. « M. Rea PauL 1950. A dictionary of color (2nd. ed.). | McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York, pp. 1 - 208; 56 composite color plates. Montcome_ry, Davin H. 1967. Responses of two haliotid gastropods (Mollusca), Hali- otis assimilis and Haliotis rufescens, to the forcipulate asteroids (Echinodermata) , Pycnopodia helianthoides and Pisaster ochra- ceus. The Veliger 9 (4) : 359 - 368; plts. 50, 51; 2 text figs. (1 April 1967) OtseEn, Davin 1968. Banding patterns of Haliotis rufescens as indicators of botanical and animal succession. Biol. Bull. 134 (1) : 139 - 141 Saxkal, S. 1962a. Ecological studies on the abalone Haliotis discus hannat Ino — I. Experimental studies on the food habit. Bull. Japan. Soc. Sci. Fisheries 28: 766 - 779 1962b. Ecological studies on the abalone Haliotis discus hannai Ino — IV. Studies on the growth. Fisheries 28: 899 - 908 Srncrair, M. 1963. Studies on the Paua, Haliotis iris MARTYN in the Wel- lington district, 1945-46. Victoria Univ. of Wellington, New Zealand, Zool. Publ. 25: 1 - 16 SoRENSEN, ANDREW W. 1949. Some observations on Haliotidae (abalones) and their world distribution. The Nautilus 62 (4): 138 - 142 Bull. Japan. Soc. Sci. STEPHENSON, T. A. 1924. Notes on Haliotis tuberculata. Assoc. U. K. 13: 480 - 495 Journ. Marine Biol. Page 140 THE VELIGER Voll 1 Now2 Haliotis pourtalest:i DALL, 1881 from Florida Waters CHARLES J. GUICE Fishery Biologist Bureau of Commercial Fisheries Biological Laboratory, Galveston, Texas 77550 ' (Plate 18) THE RARE ABALONE, Haliotis pourtalesu DA.u, 1881, pre- viously has been collected in the Gulf of Mexico on the steep continental slope bordering the Yucatan and Flor- ida Straits (Foster, 1946; Harry, 1966). Also, PARKER (1960) illustrated a fragmented shell of H. pourtalesu taken from a calcareous bank in the northwestern Gulf. On April 21, 1967, personnel of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Bureau of Commercial Fisheries dredged a specimen from 45 fathoms on the continental shelf of Florida at Latitude 24°56.8’ N, Longitude 83°40’ W. The specimen was taken about 100 nautical miles west-north- west of the location reported by Foster (1946) and 20 fathoms shallower than any previous record. Although about 200 bottom grabs were taken along 8 transects from 5 to 1 800 fathoms between St. Petersburg and Key West, Florida, Haliotis pourtalesi occurred in only one sample. The specimen is illustrated in Plate 18. Shell dimen- sions are: Height, 8mm; maximum diameter, 30 mm; and minimum diameter, 21 mm. There are 28 pore tu- bercles, 6 of which are open. The color of the shell is ' Contribution No. 268, Bureau of Commercial Fisheries, Bio- logical Laboratory, Galveston, Texas. brick red, with irregular splotches of tan scattered be- tween the line of pores and the columellar border. The apex has a well-defined protoconch, pore tubercles, spiral and shoulder threads. The specimen is deposited in the museum of the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries Biological Laboratory, Galveston, Texas. Identification was verified by Dr. Harold Harry, Texas A&M University. LITERATURE CITED FosteEr, RicHarp W. 1946. The family Haliotidae in the Western Atlantic. Johnsonia 2 (21): 36 - 40 Harry, Haroitp WILLIAM 1966. Haliotis pourtalesii Darr, 1881, from Yucatan. The Veliger 8 (4): 207 - 208; plt. 30 (1 April 1966) Parker, Rosert H. 1960. Ecology and distributional patterns of marine macro- invertebrates, northern Gulf of Mexico. In: Recent sediments, northwestern Gulf of Mexico, ed. F R.SHEpARD, E B. PHLEGER & T.H. Van ANDEL, pp. 302 - 337. Amer. Assoc. Petrol. Geol., Tulsa, Oklahoma Explanation of Plate 18 Dorsal View of Haliotis pourtalesit Dati, 1881 [GuicE] Plate 18 THE VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 2 ate 3 Vol. 11; No. 2 THE VELIGER Page 141 Removal of Pea Crabs from Live Oysters by Using Sevin” JAY D. ANDREWS DONNA TURGEON MARIAN HREHA Virginia Institute of Marine Science, Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062 Minchima nelsoni, A HAPLOSPORIDIAN PARASITE, known by the anonym MSX, caused a severe epizootic of oysters in Chesapeake Bay beginning in 1959 (ANpDREwsS, 1967). Old surviving oysters were dredged for breeding in 1964 but occurrence of pea crabs (Pinnotheres ostreum) was high. Poor condition, attributed in part to the parasitic crabs, made spawning and stripping of sexual products difficult. In the fall of 1964, progeny of these survivors being monitored for resistance to MSX also acquired serious infestations of pea crabs. Although early growth appeared normal, lots held at VIMS pier contained stunted oysters at 2 years of age in 1966. These stunted oysters often contained large pea crabs. A safe method of removing pea crabs from live oysters was needed to elim- inate another variable in our field tests of oysters for disease resistance. In 1966, Miss Hreha, a NSF summer research student, was assigned the task of finding a method for removal of pea crabs. After brief attempts with low-salinity waters, we turned to Sevin, a widely used pesticide for insects and crustaceans. Our objective was short-term exposure to kill the crabs rather than continuous exposure at low concentrations commonly used in tolerance studies. A method was developed which removes pea crabs without harming oysters. The choice of Sevin was based on garden experience and literature which indicated low toxicity for mammals and quick detoxification. Also, we found later that Loos- ANOFF (1961, 1965) had casually reported control of Pinnotheres ostreum on oyster beds treated with Sevin and chlorinated benzenes. Probably Sevin was the effec- ® Registered trademark, Union Carbide Corp., New York, N. Y. * Contribution No. 281 from the Virginia Institute of Marine Science tive agent and he suggested use of this insecticide for pea crabs in 1961. MATERIALS ann METHODS For treatment, oysters were crowded in shallow pans (25 in a pan 18 by 24 by 4 inches) holding about 10 1 of water. Technical Sevin (95%) in powder form was added to freshly pumped ambient sea water by stirring. Very low solubility of Sevin made concentrations to which oysters were exposed quite subjective. Periods of expo- sure and concentration of pesticide were gradually re- duced as elimination of crabs continued successfully. Periods of time for expulsion were measured from the beginning of treatment. After exposure, oysters were held in standing or running water until sacrificed or returned to the York River. Wooden vats were used for treating trays of experimental oysters. RESULTS Summer Studies: Oysters 2 years or more of age were treated. Only mature pea crabs were present. Treat- ments were for 24 hours with 100 mg/l of Sevin followed by continued observation in trays of running sea water. Concern that oysters might not pump led to use of freshly-drawn salt water and addition of cultured algae. Five lots of old oysters from one tray of dredged survivors of MSX were treated. Some crabs became ap- parent in 4 hours after Sevin was first added and most were out or protruding from oysters within 48 hours (Table 1). All samples had over 50% prevalence of crabs. Oysters extruding crabs were marked for later observa- tions of gill and palp damage. Damage by mature crabs to gill lamellae was always quite evident (see STAUBER, Page 142 1945). No additional crabs were found when oysters were opened after 72 hours. All crabs were dead. Table 1 Expulsion’ of Pea Crabs by Old Mobjack Bay Oysters exposed 24 hours to 100 mg/I of Sevin (2 to 12 August 1966) No. of Number of pea crabs expelled in oysters 24 hrs. 48 hrs. 72 hrs. Total 25 9 2 3 14 25 9 5 1 15 25 12 1 1 14 27 12 7 1 20 27 10 3 2 15 Total: 1292 52 18 8 78 ' Defined as first appearance of pea crab along valve margins. 2 Pea crabs in 60% of oysters Mature crabs were slowly extruded (often visible sev- eral hours on shell margins) after compression by valve action or decay. Most crabs were pushed out the ventral margin opposite their position posterior to the palps in the oysters. Legs usually appeared first but sometimes the orange-red egg sponges were the earliest parts visible. Smaller oysters (2-year-olds) yielded 26 crabs from 97 oysters, of which 4 came out on the fourth and fifth days. The crabs ranged from 4 to 15 mm but only 2 were less than 9 mm. These oysters were not sacrificed because they were progeny being monitored for resistance to MSX. The treated oysters, returned to trays in the York River, exhibited no differences from controls in growth and mor- tality during the subsequent year. Other groups gave similar results, with all crabs dead or dying even when found inside oysters. Winter Experiments: The winter experiments focused on small crabs in dormant oysters whereas the summer studies involved large crabs and active oysters. In the winter of 1966/1967, attention was given to removal of immature crabs after a rather heavy late-summer infes- tation of oysters at VIMS pier. Our objectives were to determine the effects of temperature, dosage of Sevin, length of treatment, and method and timing of ejection of small crabs. Crabs of the 1966 year-class (prehard to stage III and 1.6 to 5.2mm in carapace width) were easily distinguished from older mature ones (stage V and 8 to 15 mm). Descriptions of small crab stages are given by StauBer (1945) and CuristeENSEN & McDermott (1958). THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 2 We were concerned about effects of dosage and length of exposure time on oysters in winter because running water could not be used effectively. Oysters were inactive at ambient winter temperatures of about 5°C and warm- ing to induce pumping was presumed to be necessary. In a series of experiments, dosage was reduced from 100 mg/I to 50, 25, and 10 without change in effective- ness and timing of expulsion. Furthermore, treatment with Sevin was reduced from 48 hours (crabs were ejected more slowly in winter) to 12 hours with complete elimi- nation of crabs thereafter. At first pan water was warmed to room temperature and cultured food added before treating oysters. However, oysters placed in ambient river water with Sevin added and allowed to warm for 12 hours at room temperature pumped sufficiently to kill and expel small crabs within 48 hours (water changed to remove Sevin at 12 hours). Small crabs (<( 5mm) were ejected intact (sometimes moribund) beginning about 12 hours after initial treatment and usually removal was completed in 48 hours. Large crabs (> 8 mm) took sev- eral days to be extruded, depending upon size of oysters and rate of decay of pea crabs. In all experiments, oysters were held 48 hours or longer and pea crabs were collected frequently. It was not always possible to determine which oysters ejected small pea crabs. All oysters were opened and examined for pea crabs and gill injury. Almost without exception and regardless of size of crabs, conspicuous and charac- teristic gill damage was observed. Data on sexes, stages and sizes of pea crabs were collected. Table 2 Prevalence of Pea Crabs in VIMS Pier Oysters No. of No. of % pre- Date oysters pea crabs valence Jan. 13-16, 1967 33 9 27.3 Jan. 26 - 31 30 22 73.3 Feb. 1-6 60 35 58.3 Feb. 9- 12 40 21 52.2 Feb. 18 - 20 25 12 48.0 Feb. 21 - 24 50 33 66.0 Feb. 28 - Mar. 2 40 16 40.0 May 31 - June 7 30 7 23.3 June 26 25 5 20.0 Total 278 146 52.5 Prevalences in 1964 year-class oysters attached to pilings at VIMS pier are given for the winter of 1967 (Table 2). Oysters were treated with various dosages of Sevin for 12 to 48 hours and were opened from 2 to Vol. 11; No. 2 THE VELIGER Page 143 several days after first treatment. The small crabs were nearly always out in 48 hours but large crabs were found dead or dying in opened oysters. All crabs were expelled if oysters were held a week or more, even at ambient (winter) water temperatures. Only 11 of 146 pea crabs in Table 2 were stage V crabs (6 to 12mm). The rest were 1966 year-class pea crabs (prehard to stage III). The decrease in prevalence between winter and June samples is probably due in part to disappearance of males which were last found in the May 31 lot (see CHRISTENSEN & McDermott, 1958). Possibly tiny crabs were overlooked in the first sample, thereby accounting for the low prevalence, or oysters from a higher level on pilings may have been used. RECOMMENDED TREATMENT Our purpose was to find a program of treatment which would remove pea crabs from oysters without injury to the hosts. We sought a simple and quick method for ex- perimental purposes only. Oysters pumped freely in Se- vin concentrations up to 100 mg/l. Use of Sevin in a fine hydrophobic powder state raised questions about the con- centration in solution. Lowe (1967) states that the re- ported solubility of Sevin in water is less than 99 mg/l. Hence, all of our experiments were conducted within the probable solubility range of Sevin although not all flakes were dissolved, particularly at 100 mg/1 despite limited stirring. In October 1967 and April 1968, experiments were performed using Sevin powder and Sevin dissolved in 50 ml of acetone at 1 and 10 mg/l. Only mature pea crabs of the 1966 year-class were available in oysters because infestation by pea crabs failed completely in 1967 in lower Chesapeake Bay. Acetone appears to hasten the appear- ance of pea crabs being extruded between the valves of oysters but both treatments were equally effective in eventual removal of the parasites. For example, Brown Shoal oysters with a prevalence of 13 pea crabs in 25 oysters, were treated with 10 mg/l of powdered Sevin on Tuesday. By Friday 1 pea crab was out and another visible. Then the oysters were placed in the York River to stimulate pumping and were opened Monday. Seven- teen of 26 oysters showed typical gill erosion and only 1 decaying pea crab was found. Mature pea crabs cannot physically pass between the valves of oysters until they are mashed or rotted into a collapsed state. For simplicity we recommend treatment for 24 hours with 10 mg/l of powdered Sevin in ambient sea water. Oysters should then be placed in natural waters where vigorous pumping will occur and pea crabs be expelled. DISCUSSION Pea crabs are killed when the oyster hosts are exposed to 10 mg/1 technical Sevin in freshly drawn sea water for 24 hours. After this exposure, oysters may be returned to ambient conditions with a high probability that pea crabs will be eliminated. Salinity and temperature levels are not crucial provided the oysters pump. In winter, standing sea water should be allowed to warm from ambient tem- peratures during treatment. Attempts to accelerate pumping with artificial food were ineffective and un- necessary. Sevin is toxic to pea crabs at concentrations of less than 10 mg/] as it is to other arthropods and fish (Lowe, 1967). Pea crabs in oysters were killed with 1 mg/1 Sevin in acetone in one experiment. Heavier dosage seems to provide quicker response in terms of appearance of large pea crabs being ejected from oysters. For our purpose, a dosage of 10 mg/I for limited periods seems reasonable in view of rapid hydrolysis of Sevin. Although 12 hours has been adequate for killing crabs in oysters, 24 hours provides some margin for oysters which may be slow to resume pumping, and longer exposure does no harm. No attempt has been made to determine critical toxicity levels for oysters or crabs because chronic exposure is not desirable or necessary. No consideration was given to testing oysters for Sevin or its derivatives since the method is intended only for experimental purposes. LITERATURE CITED AnprEws, Jay D. « J. L. Woop 1967. | Oyster mortality studies in Virginia. VI. History and distribution of Minchinia nelsoni, a pathogen of oysters, in Virginia. Chesapeake Sci. 8 (1): 1-13 CHRISTENSEN, AaGE MOLLER & JOHN J. McDERMOTT 1958. Life-history and biology of the oyster crab, Pinnotheres ostreum Say. Biol. Bull. 114 (2): 146-179 LoosanorF, Victor L. 1961. | Recent advances in the control of shellfish predators and competitors. Proc. Gulf Caribb. Fish. Inst. 13 (1960): 113 - 128 1965. Pesticides in sea water and the possibilities of their use in mariculture, pp. 135-145. In Research in Pesticides. Academ. Press, New York, N. Y. Lowe, Jack L. 1967. Effects of prolonged exposure to Sevin on an estuarine fish, Leiostomus xanthurus LACEPEDE. Bull. Environ. Con- tamin. and Toxicol. 2 (3): 147-155 Srauser, L. A. 1945. Pinnotheres ostreum, parasitic on the American oyster, Ostrea (Gryphaea) virginica. Biol. Bull. 88: 269 - 291 Page 144 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 2 New Northern Limit for the Limpet, Acmaea digitalis WILLIAM F. JESSEE School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego La Jolla, California 92037 DurING THE RECENT Bering Sea Expedition of the re- search vessel Alpha Helix, there was some brief oppor- tunity to examine the intertidal fauna of the southern coast of the Bering Sea. The intertidal zone in this region presents an extremely hostile environment in comparison with either the strictly terrestrial or the strictly marine zones. During the winter, intertidal invertebrates are ex- posed twice daily to submergence in water of temper- atures from +2° to —1.5° C, followed by exposure to air in which temperatures of — 10° C or lower are quite common. Survival and propagation under such conditions is indeed remarkable. In mid-March, 1968, 6 specimens of the limpet Acmaea digitalis EscHScHOLTZ, 1833 were collected from the rocks along the shore of the enclosed bay at Dutch Har- bor, on the Bering Sea side of Unalaska Island. The area of collection was at a latitude of about 53°50’ N. Air temperatures ranged from a daily high in the mid- thirties (Fahrenheit) to an early morning low of +15° to +20° FE The animals collected were unremarkable in any aspect of their morphology, and were definitely iden- tified as specimens of A. digitalis. The largest specimen measured 25 mm in length, 18 mm in width, and 15 mm in height. As far as can be determined from the literature, this is the first instance in which Acmaea digitalis has been re- ported from the Bering Sea. Test (1945, 1946) cites Acmaea as being a Pacific genus with the northern limit of distribution of A. digitalis being the Aleutians. Earlier works (Datt, 1871, 1878) appear somewhat contradic- tory in their descriptions of the distribution of this species, but in no instance does reference appear to its occurrence on the shores of the Bering Sea. Dati (1871) states that the northern limit appears to be Cape Spencer (near Juneau), a region of much milder climate than Unalaska Island. Attempts to locate specimens of Acmaea species further north, through colleagues in Nome and on the island of Nunivak, were unsuccessful. Although their re- ports are most likely correct, personal confirmation of the absence of Acmaea in these areas is not available at this time. That an intertidal species should have such a wide distribution as does Acmaea digitalis seems truly amazing. At the southern extreme of its distribution, near San Diego, California, individuals may be exposed to tem- peratures as high as 35° to 40° C during summer low tide periods, while at Dutch Harbor the animals are subject to winter low tide temperatures considerably be- low the freezing point of sea water. It is hoped that studies on temperature tolerances, desiccation, and freez- ing resistance in this species can soon be undertaken. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author wishes to express his gratitude to Professor Per FE Scholander, director of the Physiological Research Laboratory of Scripps Institution of Oceanography, for the opportunity to participate in his phase of the Bering Sea Expedition of the R/V Alpha Helix. This expedition was made possible by grant GB-7173 from the National Science Foundation to Professor Scholander. LITERATURE CITED Dati, WiLL1AM HEALEY 1871. | On the limpets; with special reference to the species of the West Coast of America, and to a more natural classifica- tion of the group. Amer. Journ. Conch. 6: 227 - 282 1878. Report on the limpets and chitons of the Alaskan and Arctic regions. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 1: 281 - 344 Test, Avery Ransom (Grant) 1945. Ecology of California Acmaea. 395 - 405 1946. Speciation in limpets of the genus Acmaea. Con- trib. Lab. Vertebrate Biol., Univ. Michigan, Ann Arbor. No. 31: 1-24 Ecology 26 (4): Vol. 11; No. 2 THE VELIGER Page 145 Feeding Behavior of Corambella steinbergae BY JAMES W. McBETH Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California 92037 INTRODUCTION ONE OF THE MOST CoMMON nudibranchs found in the Friday Harbor region of the San Juan Islands, Washing- ton, is Corambella steinbergae LANcer, 1962. In the sum- mer of 1967 I had the opportunity to study the feeding behavior of this dorid in relation to the bryozoan, Mem- branipora sp., upon which it is exclusively found and whose color and pattern it mimics perfectly. A search of the literature yielded nothing concerning the interaction between these organisms, but it is generally agreed that C. steinbergae teeds upon this ectoproct. Studies on the feeding of the Corambidae in general are also very sparse. Corambe pacifica MacFaRLAND & O’DonocuuE, 1929 has been reported to feed on Mem- branipora villosa Hincxks, but no detail is given (Mac- FarLAnp & O’DonocHUE, op. cit.). Similarly, a recent paper on the biology of Doridella obscura VerriL1, 1870 mentions only that this nudibranch is “always found in association with and feeding on encrusting Bryoza” Membranipora crustulenta PaLvas in this case (FRANZ, 1967). The purpose of this study was to find out if Corambella Steinbergae does, in fact, feed upon Membranipora colo- nies, and if so, to describe the feeding behavior. OBSERVATIONS Initial laboratory observations with a dissecting micro- scope revealed that Corambella steinbergae definitely does feed upon Membranipora colonies. The dorid ap- proaches a fresh zooecium by pressing its mouth against the smooth surface of the frontal membrane. The lips are then protruded to form a water-tight attachment to the membrane. The radula begins to move in short bursts, from its normal position under the crop, out to the frontal membrane, where a breach is made. The effective rasping stroke is the posterior to anterior one, during which the large lateral spines point forward. When a slit has been made in the outer, tough, dorsal covering of the zooid, the soft part is sucked out. Sucking is achieved by pulsating dilations of the buccal pump, rhythmically assisted by the lips, which press on the zooid membrane, compressing the contents of the cell. Action of the radula is continued and the more solid parts of the zooid body are carried up on the radular teeth, al- though the radula was never seen to extend into the body cavity of the zooecium. As soon as the zooecium is emptied of living material, the radula is retracted and the nudibranch pulls its head away. The lips continue to stick to the frontal membrane for a brief moment until the suction is released. This lip protrusion can be artifi- cially induced by forcing the head up while the animal is feeding. When a zooecium has been cleaned out, the nudibranch moves to another one and repeats the process. Studies were also made on the potential feeding behav- ior of Corambella steinbergae on other genera of encrust- ing ectoprocts, but in no case was feeding observed. DISCUSSION The feeding behavior of the Corambidae offers a rela- tively untapped field of research. Detailed studies could be accomplished by growing Membranipora colonies on glass plates in order for the feeding process to be observed through the underside of the plate. Other interesting problems related to feeding behavior could include a com- parison of the bryozoan growth rate to the nudibranch grazing rate. Tentative studies show that the colonies of Membranipora could support many more individuals of Corambella than they do, despite the presence of other predators, such as Corambe pacifica. Many colonies of Membranipora were found to be free of Corambella steinbergae, while others of the same size had as many as 20 individuals on them. It would, therefore, be of great interest to make a detailed, local distributional study of these organisms, as well as a study of movement and post-metamorphic settling. Another study that demands attention is concerned with the relationship between Corambella steinbergae and Corambe pacifica. These two species have very sim- ilar physical and behavioral characteristics and are often found on the same Membranipora colony. It would be of great ecological interest to compare the biology of Page 146 THE VELIGER these two nudibranchs to expose the full extent of their similarity. SUMMARY Direct observations show that the nudibranch Corambella steinbergae preys on the colonial bryozoan Membrani- pora sp. Its mode of feeding is a combination of radular and sucking action. Further possible studies on the bio- logy of Corambella steinbergae are mentioned. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am grateful for the opportunity afforded me to do this study at the Friday Harbor Laboratories, University of Washington, through the aid of N.S.E Marine Sci- ences Training grant 11-5055. I would like to express appreciation to Dr. J. A.C. Nicol and Dr. D.L. Ray for their help throughout the course of the study; to J. R. Lance for his valuable initial suggestions; and to Dr. D.L. Fox for his criticisms of the manuscript. LITERATURE CITED Franz, Davip R. 1967. On the taxonomy and biology of the dorid nudibranch Doridella obscura. The Nautilus 80: 73 - 79 Lance, JAMES ROBERT 1962. A new Stiliger and a new Corambella (Mollusca: Opis- thobranchia) from the northwestern Pacific. The Veliger 5 (1): 33-38; plt. 6; figs. 1-10 (1 July 1962) MacFarianpb, FRANK Mace « CuarLes Henry O’DoNOGHUE 1929. A new species of Corambe from the Pacific Coast of North America. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. ser. 4, 18: 1 - 27 Vol..11; No.:2 Vol. 11; No. 2 NOTES & NEWS A New Record of Corambella steinbergae LANCE, 1962 BY TERRENCE GOSLINER 859 Butterfield Road, San Anselmo, California 94960 On May 16, 1968 I collected at San Francisco Yacht Harbor (Marina) one specimen of Corambella stein- bergae LANcE, 1962. It measured 8 mm in length and was found on the Membranipora membranacea (LINNAEUS, 1767) which was encrusted on Laminaria. The range of this dorid extended from San Diego to British Columbia. The next area north of Monterey, where C. steinbergae was known to occur, was Puget Sound, Washington. Thus, the occurrence of this species in San Francisco Bay estab- lishes an important intermediary location. The specimen was identical with the original specimen described by Lance and was very close to Corambella bolini MacFartanp, 1966. The specimen has smooth rhinophores with a clear transparent dorsum marked with narrow lanes that closely resemble Membranipora. My thanks to Miss Joan Steinberg who enlightened me as to the significance of the presence of this animal in San Francisco Bay and also for her help in the identi- fication of the specimen. LITERATURE CITED Lance, JAMES RoBERT 1961. A distributional list of Southern California opistho- branchs. The Veliger 4 (2): 64-69 (1 October 1961) 1962. A new Stiliger and a new Corambella (Mollusca: Opis- thobranchia) from the northeastern Pacific. The Veliger 5 (1): 33-38; plt. 6; figs. 1- 10 (1 July 1962) W. S. M. THE SECOND ANNUAL MEETING of the Western Society of Malacologists will be held at the conference grounds at Asilomar State Park, Pacific Grove, California June 18 to 21, 1969. Scientific papers, symposia on related problems, and exhibits will be presented in various fields related to the study of malacology and invertebrate zoo- logy. THE VELIGER Page 147 Officers for the coming year who were elected at the 1968 conference are as follows: President, Dr. William K. Emerson, American Museum of Natural History; First Vice President, Dr. A. Myra Keen, Stanford Uni- versity; Second Vice President, Mr. Eugene Coan, Stan- ford University; Secretary, Mrs. Paul O. Hughes, Los Alamitos; Treasurer, Mrs. Leroy Poorman, Pasadena; Members-at-Large, Dr. Judith Terry, Palo Alto, Cali- fornia and Miss Betsy Harrison, Honolulu, Hawaii. All persons interested in malacology and conchology are cordially invited to attend and participate in the coming conference. Excellent accommodations in varying price ranges (American Plan) will be available for those making their reservations early. For information on the conference or on membership in the Society please address the Secretary, Mrs. Paul O. Hughes, 12871 Foster Road, Los Alamitos, California 90720. Moving? If your address is changed it will be important to notify us of the new address at least six weeks before the effective date, and not less than six weeks before our regular mailing dates. Because of a number of drastic changes in the regulations affecting second class mailing, there is now a sizeable charge to us on the returned copies as well as for our remailing to the new address. We are forced to ask our members and subscribers for reimbursement of these charges; further, because of increased costs in connection with the new mailing plate, we also must ask for reimbursement of that expense. Effective January 8, 1968 the following charges must be made: change of address — §$1.- change of address and re-mailing of a returned issue — $2.-. We must emphasize that these charges cover only our actual expenses and do not include compensation for the extra work involved in re-packing and re-mailing returned copies. Page 148 Important Notices Because of the changed rules affecting second class mail matter, we will no longer be able to include the customary reminders in our January issue, nor can we attach any flyers to our journal henceforth. We shall, from now on, print a statement when dues-renewal time has arrived or announcements regarding special publi- cations in our Notes & News column. Manuscripts received up to February 14 each year will be considered for publication in our July issue; May 14 is the deadline for the October issue, August 14 for the January issue and November 14 for the April issue. For very short papers of less than 500 words (including title, etc.) the deadlines are one month later than those given above, provided that these short notes are impor- tant enough to warrant preferential treatment. It is, how- ever, understood that submission of a manuscript before the dates indicated is not a guarantee of acceptance. On May 15, 1968 we published the second part of the supplement to Volume 3 and mailed it to those of our members and subscribers who, according to our records, had purchased Part 1 before December 31, 1964. Part 2 will be available at $3.- plus a handling charge of $-.35 (plus sales tax, for California residents). The complete supplement is available at $6.- plus a handling charge of $-.45 (plus, again, the sales tax for California residents). We deplore the long delay in the publication of Part 2 as it is our policy to publish as promptly as is technically feasible. But unusual and completely unpredictable cir- cumstances over which we had absolutely not the slightest control are responsible. We also regret that the delay may have inconvenienced some of our readers who had given up hope of ever secing Part 2 in print and therefore had their journal bound. To these readers we extend our apologies. We are pleased to announce the publication on July 15, 1968 of a Supplement to Volume 11, entitled: The Biology of Acmaea edited by D. P. Abbott, D. Epel, I. A. Abbott and R. Stohler. This supplement is a group of 20 papers dealing with various aspects of the biology of several different species of limpets. It comprises 112 pages, 7 halftone THE VELIGER Vol. 11; Now2 plates and numerous text figures, charts and tables. This supplement, like all our supplements, will be sold on separate order only. The price is $5.- plus a handling charge of $0.35; however, members in good standing are granted a discount of 20% on the sales price provided remittance for the correct amount is received before June 30, 1969. No discount can be granted after that date. California residents must add the appropriate amount of sales tax. ———SSSE ESS CALIFORNIA MALACOZOOLOGICAL Society, Inc. announces: Backnumbers of THE VELIGER and other publications Volume 9: $22.- Volume 10: $24.- Volumes 1 through 8: out of print Supplement to Volume 3: $6.-* plus $-.35 handling charge [Part 1: Opisthobranch Mollusks of California by Prof. Ernst Marcus; Part 2: The Anaspidea of California by Prof.. R. Beeman and The Thecosomata and Gymnosomata of the Cali- fornia Current by Prof. John A. McGowan] [The two parts are available separately at $3.- each plus a handling charge of $-.35 or as indicated above. If purchased separately, each part is subject to the Califor- nia State sales tax if mailed to California addresses.] Supplement to Volume 6: $4.-* plus $-.35 mailing charge [Biology of Tegula funebralis (A. ApAms), edited by Abbott, Blinks, Phillips and Stohler] Supplement to Volume 7: $2.-* plus $-.35 mailing charge [Glossary of A Thousand-and-One Terms used in Conchology, compiled by Winirrep H. ArNotp] Items marked with * are subject to sales tax in the State of California; residents of that State please add the appropriate amount to their remittances. Prices subject to change without notice. Send orders with remittance to: Mrs. Jean M. Cate, Manager, 12719 San Vicente Boule- vard, Los Angeles, Calif. 90049. Please, make checks payable to C. M.S., Inc. Shipments of material ordered are generally made within two weeks after receipt of remittance. Woolen T= Now2 THE VELIGER Page 149 Backnumbers of the current volume will be mailed to new subscribers, as well as to those who renew late, on the first working day of the month following receipt of the remittance. The same policy applies to new members. Subscription to Volume 11: $18.- domestic; $18.80 in Canada, Mexico, Central and South America; $19.20 all other foreign coutries. Affiliate Membership in the C.M.S., Inc. is $6.- for the fiscal year July 1, 1968 to June 30, 1969. Postage for members living in Canada, Mexico, Central and South America 80 cents, for members living in any other foreign country $1.20 additional. Membership open to indi- viduals only - no institutional memberships. Please, send for membership application forms to the Manager or the Editor. At a Regular Membership Meeting of the CaLirorNia MatacozooLocicaL Society, Inc. the following policies were adopted by unanimous vote: There will be an initiation fee of $2.- (in addition to the annual dues) for persons joining the Society on or after January 1, 1967. Members receive The Veliger free of further charges and are entitled to purchase one copy of any supplement pub- lished during the current membership year at a special discount (to be determined for each supplement). Membership renewals are due on or before April 15 each year. If renewal payments are made after April 15 but before March 15 of the following year, there will be a re-instatement fee of $1.-. Members whose dues pay- ments (including the re-instatement fee) have not been received by the latter date, will be dropped from the rolls of the Society. They may rejoin by paying a new initiation fee. The volume(s) published during the time a member was in arrears may be purchased, if still available, at the regular full volume price plus applicable handling charges. CALIFORNIA MALACOZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY, Inc. is a non-profit educational corporation (Articles of In- corporation No. 463389 were filed January 6, 1964 in the office of the Secretary of State). The Society publishes a scientific quarterly, the VELIGER. Donations to the Society are used to pay a part of the production costs and thus to keep the subscription rate at a minimum. Donors may designate the Fund to which their contribution is to be credited: Operating Fund (available for current production) ; Savings Fund (available only for specified purposes, such as publication of especially long and signi- ficant papers); Endowment Fund (the income from which is available. The principal is irrevocably dedicated to scientific and educational purposes). Unassigned dona- tions will be used according to greatest need. Contributions to the C. M.S., Inc. are deductible by donors as provided in section 170 of the Internal Revenue Code (for Federal income tax purposes). Bequests, lega- cies, gifts, devices are deductible for Federal estate and gift tax purposes under section 2055, 2106, and 2522 of the Code. The ‘Ireasurer of the C. M. S., Inc. will issue suitable receipts which may be used by Donors to substan- tiate their respective tax deductions. BOOKS, PERIODICALS, PAMPHLETS The Deep-Sea Bivalvia. The John Murray Expedition 1933-34, Scientific Reports, Vol. XI, No. 3, Publ. No. 657, pp. 237 - 343, pls. 1 - 3, figs. 1-38 in text, May 19, 1967. Published by the Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History). by J. KNupsEN. Forty-four species of deep-sea bivalves from the Indo- west Pacific region are described and illustrated in this paper. Of these 39 were dredged by the John Murray Expedition and 5, chiefly in the Zoological Museum col- lection in Copenhagen, were collected by other expedi- tions. The species are distributed into 16 families and 24 genera. Families embracing the largest number of species are the Pectinidae (9) and the Cuspidariidae (8). Six species are described as new: Tindaria murrayi, Spinula filatovae, Amussium sewelli, Pitar sewelli, Xylophaga murrayt and Lyonsia murrayt. Most of the specimens were recovered from depths below 400m. The minimum and maximum depths re- ported for stations from which the assemblage was ob- tained were 196 and 3872 m respectively. Remarks on the systematics, observations on the soft parts, and repro- ductive development of the various species are included as well as distribution, bottom content and temperature. Four, possibly 6, are widely distributed abyssal species. Four were from the Red Sea, but 3 of these also live outside that area. Thirty-four are bathyal of which 10 range to East Africa and to Japanese waters. The author of the paper mentions that the bathyal bivalves suggest the existence of an Indo-West Pacific fauna having the Page 150 same range as the adjacent shallow water fauna but distinct from the bathyal bivalves of New Zealand, Australia, and South Africa. Twenty species were found to be carnivorous. Seven of these, whose stomach content revealed small crustaceans (copepods, ostracods) and foraminifera, belong in the Pectinidae; 13 other species belong to the Septibranchia. An interesting distribution is given for Amygdalum politum (VERRILL & SMITH) (pp. 269-272, text figs. 14 and 38 [map]), from Japan to the Red Sea, east and west Africa, western Europe and in the western Atlantic off eastern United States. A species of special interest to west American workers is that cited as C'ryptodon bisecta (Conran, 1849), (pp. 284, 325, pl. 2, figs. 7, 8), from the south Arabian coast and from the Banda Sea. Conrad’s species was originally described from strata of middle Miocene age at Astoria, Oregon. It has been reported as a fossil at other localities in western North America, western Panama, Japan, Kamtschatka, Spitzbergen, and Colombia. In the synony- my of C. bisecta in the present paper are included both C. investigatoris E. A. SmirH, 1895, originally described from the Indian Ocean, and Conchocele disjuncta Gass, 1866, originally described from strata of late Pliocene or carly Pleistocene age at San Pedro, California. Most west American authors currently consider the Recent species cited in the literature as Thyasira bisecta living in west American waters to be referable to Thya- sira disjuncta (Gass) (Conchoccle disjuncta Gass, 1866), an assignment discussed by TEGLAND (Nautilus, vol. 41, pp. 129-130, 1928). The shell of this species differs from that of T. bisecta in that the anterior end is steeply trun- cated rather than rounded and projecting. Thyasira dis- juncta also has been reported living in Japanese waters and recently Boss (Bull. Mar. Sci., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 386 to 388, 1967) reported it living in Caribbean waters in the Gulf of Darien off Colombia at depths of 421-641 m. In view of the variation and wide distribution reported by various authors for these large forms of Thyasira, further study of their identity and range is desirable. A survey of the deep-sea bivalves of the R.I. M.S. Investigator and a pertinent list of references are in- cluded in this interesting contribution to knowledge of deep-sea Pelecypoda. LGH Lavori della Societa Malacologica Italiana Volumes 1 to 3. Milano, 1964-1966. $12.00, Dr. Fernando Ghisotti, Via Grotto, 9, Milano. This collection represents the rebirth of an Italian mala- cological journal, replacing the long defunct Giornale THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 2 di Malacologia (Pavia, 1853-1854), Bullettino Malaco- logico Italiano (Pisa, 1868-1874), and Bullettino della Societa Malacologica Italiana (Pisa, 1875-1895). Fol- lowing the establishment of the European Malacological Union, the Italian contingent, led by Sacchi (Naples) and Ghisotti (Milan) formed a society in 1963. The first two volumes consist of reprints of articles published in other Italian scientific journals, the most notable paper is by Sacchi on the origin and evolution of the molluscan fauna of the southern Apennines which originally appeared in 1963 in the Annual of the Insti- tute and Museum of the University of Naples. The first convention of the society took place in Sep- tember 1966, and volume 3 of the Lavori includes the original articles, some with descriptions of new species, which were presented at this meeting. One of the best papers was given by the French authority Lamotte. His summary of the factors contributing to the polymorphism in color and banding in populations of Cepaea nemoralis generated considerable interest. Phenotypic differences in color and banding are of selective significance as shown in the results of a number of experiments, and environ- mental conditions, such as temperature and proximity to the sea are related to the frequency of the banding; unbanded snails are more resistant to environmental extremes. A molecular approach to the study of molluscan phylogeny was postulated by Parisi; he recounted the value of immunological experiments in ascertaining re- lationships between species and summarized information available on the distribution and occurrence of molluscan _ blood pigments. Girod and Pezzoli presented an exhaust- ively documented account of the ecology and distribution of two species of the hydrobiid Bythinella in Lombardy. The first convention was dedicated to Giorgio Jan who, with Guiseppe de Cristofori, was responsible for the founding of the Milan Museum of Natural History. - Conci presents a short history of that institution along with a list of Jan’s published works. For American mala- cologists who have had references to the works of Stop- pani or Brocchi, it is unfortunate to discover that the Stoppani collection was destroyed during the second World War. However, much of Brocchi’s material was saved and critically redescribed by C. Rossi Ronchetti (1952-1955. I tipi della “Conchiologia fossile subapen- nina” di G. Brocchi. Riv. Ital. Paleont. Stratigr., Mem. V, Milano, 343 pp., 185 figs.). Of the remaining articles, the more important include Mariani and Ravera on the trophic ecology of Physa acuta; Ravera on mollusks as experimental subjects in radiobiology; Torchio on stranding in cephalopods; and Carrada et al. on the biogeography of the mollusks of Vol. 11; No. 2 THE VELIGER Page 151 Sardinia. Most of the articles have summaries in English, German or French. Attention should be called to the “Schede Malacolo- giche del Mediterraneo,” edited for the Societa by Dr. Ghisotti (price for the first 11 Schede, 3 175 Lire, $5.00; see review by S. Peter Dance, 1968, Journ. Conch., 26 (4): 281-282). K. J. Boss The Systematic Relationship of Pomatiopsis lapidaria and Oncomelania hupensis formosana by G. M. Davis. pp. 1-143; 32 plts.; 15 text figs. Malacologia, vol. 6, nos. 1-2, 1967. The comparative anatomy and the potential for hybridi- zation of the two members of related hydrobiid genera were studied, as well as the electrophoretic properties and laboratory ecology in an attempt to ascertain differences which might be of value to systematics. On the basis of their anatomy Pomatiopsis and Onco- melania are judged to be distinct genera in the subfamily Pomatiopsinac. This is well documented in the paper. Disc electrophoretic studies revealed the fact that the members of the two genera have specific patterns of protein components, those of the Oncomelanias being dense and faster moving, while those of the species of Pomatiopsis are less dense and not fast moving. Members of Oncomelania did well in laboratory cult- ure, while the species of Pomatiopsis studied did not adapt well to laboratory culture. Young of Oncomelania grew at the rate of 0.65 mm per week with low mortality, whereas the young of Pomatiopsis grew at a rate of less than 0.14 mm per week, with a mortality of over 30% in 2 months, Documentation of the findings is supported by numer- ous well executed drawings and graphs. The pertinent literature seems to be thoroughly reviewed. RS Summary of North American Blancan Nonmarine Mollusks by Dwicut W. Taytor. Malacologia, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1-172; plts. 1-8; 18 text figs. The author reviews all known North American nonmarine mollusks of late Pliocene and early Pleistocene (Blancan) age. Lists of last appearances of genera and families are given. About 50 or so Blancan assemblages together with 10 to 15 older or younger faunas (these included for convenience of discussion) are summarized under 57 local geographic headings. On pp. 132 and 133 taxonomic changes are listed; among these are: 1 new genus (Savaginius) ; 3 new sub- genera (Calibasis, Oreobasis and Idabasis, all subgenera of Juga) ; a new species (Planorbella wilsoni) and a new family (Pliopholygidae in the Viviparacea). New names are proposed as follows: Juga chrysopylica for “Goniobasis rodeoensis’ of Hanna, 1923, not of Crark, 1915; and Radix intermontana for Lymnaea ida- hoensis YEN, 1946 non HEeNnperson, 1931. There are 54 taxonomic changes in classification in- cluding 20 species being synonymized and the remaining changes involving transfers of species to other genera, re- storation of a family, and other clarifications of status. About 20 pages are taken up by the list of references. RS Notice des Titres et Travaux Scientifiques (1941-1966) by Denise Monain. pp. 1-78; 7 figures. Apparently privately printed; Paris, July 1967. This brochure contains a complete list of papers, both published as well as unpublished ones, of Dr. Mongin. With each title is given a brief abstract. There is a list of the new taxa proposed by the author, 7.¢., 3 new genera and 23 new spccies; this list is followed by a detailed list of the collections containing the fossils studicd by this author. In all, 50 papers are listed, comprising from 2 or 3 pages to about 500 pages. These papers are the result of 25 years of active scientific work by Miss Mongin. Of special interest to the reviewer is the statement by the author of her philosophy which guided her in all her work. She states that in the course of her studies of fossil mollusks her views were always oriented toward a biological and ecological interpretation of the collected faunas and a reconstruction of the bathymetric conditions of the marine deposits and from these the paleography of the epoch under study. RS Les Mollusques du Bathonien Saumatre du Moyen-Atlas by Denise Moncin. Notes et Mémoires du Service géologique du Maroc, no. 200; pp. 35-95; plts. 1-5, 1967. New spccies described are:Isognomon marocanus; Eo- miodon gardcti; Neomiodon skouraensis; and Terebrella Page 152 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 2 falloti. The treatment of the species is in the best taxo- nomic tradition and all species discussed — not only the new ones — are beautifully illustrated. RS Der Schwimmvorgang bei Gasteropteron rubrum (Rafinesque 1814) by H.R. HArreLrincer & A. Kress. Revue Suisse de Zoologie, vol. 74, no. 3: pp. 547-554; 4 text figs. Gastcropteron rubrum, an opisthobranch, occurring in the Mediterranean and in the Atlantic, lives primarily on slimy bottoms in depths of 50 to 80m, but occasionally is encountered on rocky bottoms. Although this species has been observed at times in great numbers in the vicin- ity of Banyuls-sur-Mer, the authors were able to obtain but a single specimen over a period of 30 months during which they sought it intensively. The specimen observed and photographed was obtained while dredging over a coralline bottom in about 50m depth on May 30, 1964. The swimming activity was filmed at 24 frames/second. It was observed that the parapodia are used in a man- ner comparable to the fluttering of butterflies. They per- form a few strong motions, lasting about 30 to 40 seconds, after which time the motions may become weaker or stop altogether for a restperiod of 20 to 30 seconds. During this quiescent period the animal slowly sinks to the bot- tom. The parapodia are extended sideways like wings.. Such swimming could be induced by disturbing the resting animal; however, the animal also could start the swimming spontancously. The swimming of Gasteropteron was compared with that of other opisthobranchs and it was noted that it is similar to that of several listed species, but differs from that of Notarchus punctatus. That species seems to swim by the principle of repulsion. RS Die embryonale Ausgestaltung der frithen Mitteldarmanlage von Octopus vulgaris Lam, by Sicurp v. BoLeTzky. Revue Suisse de Zoologie, vol. 74, no. 3: pp. 555-562; 5 text figs. In this paper the development from stage VII to stage XII (stage designation according to Narr, 1921) is pre- sented. It was noted that the formation of the mid-gut complex in Octopus is essentially the same as it is in decapods. RS Beobachtungen tber den Feinbau des Schulps von Sepia officinalis , by Icnaz KALtn. Revue Suisse de Zoologie, vol. 74, no. 3: pp. 596-602; 3 text figs.; 1 plt. The author demonstrates that the supporting clements in the swelling (“Wulst”) of the cuttlebone of Sepia officinalis are not pillars, but rather ramified bands which are not closed in themselves. They differ in length and in their meandering form in the dorsal and ventral portions of the chambers. The crossing of wide and narrow me- andering bands on the dorsal and ventral sides of the septa are of utmost importance in the supporting task in the cuttlebone. Where the bands meander widely, the connection of the bands is strong, whereas where they meander narrowly, the connection is weak. These obser- vations are interpreted as pointing to the possibility that the cuttlebone is not an absolutely rigid hydrostatic sys- tem but that it may possess some elasticity. RS Statement of Ownership, Management, etc. of “The Veliger,” published quarterly, on the first day of July, October, January, and April, at Berkeley, California, as required by the Act of August 24, 1912. Publisher: California Malacozoological Socicty, Inc. Editor: Rudolf Stohler. Owner: California Malacozoological Soicety, Inc., a non-profit, educational corporation. Bondholders, mortgagees, and security holders: none. (signed) R. SToH eR, Editor. THE VELIGER is open to original papers pertaining to any problem concerned with mollusks. This is meant to make facilities available for publication of original articles from a wide field of endeavor. Papers dealing with anatomical, cytological, distri- butional, ecological, histological, morphological, physiological, taxonomic, etc., aspects of marine, freshwater or terrestrial mollusks from any region, will be considered. Even topics only indirectly concerned with mollusks may be acceptable. It is the editorial policy to preserve the individualistic writing style of the author; therefore any editorial changes in a manuscript will be submitted to the author for his approval, before going to press. Short articles containing descriptions of new species or other taxa will be given preferential treatment in the speed of publication provided that arrangements have been made by the author for depositing the holotype with a recognized public Museum. Museum numbers of the type specimens must be included in the manuscript. Type localities must be defined as accurately as possible, with geo- graphical longitudes and latitudes added. Short original papers, not exceeding 500 words, may be published in the column “NOTES and NEWS’; in this column will also appear notices of meetings of regional, national and international malacological organizations, such as A. M.U., U. M. E., W.S. M., etc., as well as news items which are deemed of interest to our Members and subscribers in general. Articles on “METHODS and TECH- NIQUES” will be considered for publication in another column, provided that the information is complete and techniques and methods are capable of duplication by anyone carefully following the description given. Such articles should be mainly original and deal with collecting, preparing, maintaining, studying, photographing, etc., of mollusks or other invertebrates. A third column, entitled “INFORMA- TION DESK,” will contain articles dealing with any problem pertaining to collecting, identifying, etc., in short, problems encountered by our readers. In contrast to other contributions, articles in this column do not necessarily contain new and original materials. Questions to the editor, which can be answered in this column, are invited. The column “BOOKS, PERIODICALS, and PAMPHLETS” will attempt to bring reviews of new publications to the attention of our readers. Also, new timely articles may be listed by title only, if this is deemed expedient. Manuscripts should be typed in final form on a high grade white paper, not exceeding 81,” by 11”, at least double spaced and accompanied by a clear carbon or photo copy. A pamphlet with detailed suggestions for preparing manuscripts intended for publication in THE VELIGER is available to authors upon request. A self-addressed envelope, sufficiently large to accommodate the pamphlet (which measures 51,” by 81”), with double first class postage, should be sent with the request to the Editor. EDITORIAL BOARD Dr. Donatp P. Assort, Professor of Biology Hopkins Marine Station of Stanford University Dr. Jerry DonouueE, Professor of Chemistry University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, and Research Associate in the Allan Hancock Foundation University of Southern California, Los Angeles Dr. J. Wyatr Duruam, Professor of Paleontology University of California, Berkeley Dr. E. W. Facer, Professor of Biology Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla University of California at San Diego Dr. Caner Hann, Professor of Zoology and Director, Bodega Marine Laboratory University of California, Berkeley Dr. G Darras Hanna, Curator Department of Geology California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco Dr. Jorn W. Hepcpetn, Resident Director Marine Science Laboratory, Oregon State University Newport, Oregon Dr. Lro G. HERTLEIN, Curator of Invertebrate Paleontology California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Dr. RupotF SToH LER, Research Zoologist University of California, Berkeley Dr. A. Myra KEEN, Professor of Paleontology and Curator of Malacology Stanford University, Stanford, California Dr. Victor Loosanorr, Professor of Marine Biology Pacific Marine Station of the University of the Pacific Dr. Journ McGowan, Associate Professor of Oceanography Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla University of California at San Diego Dr. Frank A. Piretxa, Professor of Zoology University of California, Berkeley Mr. Attyn G. Smiru, Associate Curator Department of Invertebrate Zoology California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco Dr. Ratpu I. Smiru, Professor of Zoology University of California, Berkeley Dr. Cuartes R. STasEK, Associate Professor of Zoology Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida Dr. Donatp M. Witson, Professor of Biology Department of Biological Sciences Stanford University, Stanford, California ASSOCIATE EDITOR Mrs. JEAN M. CaTE Los Angeles, California THE VELIGER A Quarterly published by CALIFORNIA MALACOZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY, INC. Berkeley, California VOLUME II JANUARY I, 1969 NUMBER 3 CoNnTENTS Maturation of Gonads of Oysters, Crassostrea virginica, of Different Geographical Areas Subjected to Relatively Low Temperatures (Plates 19 to 2 Victor L. LoosaANorF . .-. , Pan) 6G A Review of the Living Llentanaeean, Bivalves of the Gens Atenas (40 Text figures) EIAROLD Wa Harry) > ..\ eee sete gOS The Egg Capsules of Jenneria Pastulata ee arroow 1786); with ‘Notes on Spawning in the Laboratory (1 Text figure; 1 Table) CuHartes N. D’Asaro . . . : Sicoub yee (a) The Taxonomic Significance and Theoketical Gaen af ‘Surace pattems ona Newly Discovered Bivalve Shell Layer, the Mosaicostracum (Plates 26 to 38; 3 Tables) Georce H. Hami_ton At SAE Fe eRe ue aa Gey) loe POG A New Species of Strombina from the @alapaccs Helarids (Plate 39) WILTIAMUK EMERSON S7ANTHONY, DYATEILIO) (0) 5) ee es TOR A Note on Feeding and Excretion in Bivalves P DinaMANI . . . 198 Volutocorbis and F aivotlta: Two Gan of ‘Deepwater Woluudae ibe South Atica (Plates 40 to 43; 1 Table) Haratp A. REHDER . . . + - 200 List of Type Specimens of Terebridaes in tHe British iim ‘(Natural Ehistony) WALTER O. CERNOHORSKY .. . 250 The Ecology of Macoma inconspicua (Eeopenm & SeUreLoY. 1829) i (Central San Francisco Bay. Part I. The Vertical Distribution of the Macoma Community (Plate 44; 6 Text oe 2 Tables) Marityn T. VASSALLO , . . ; mores e223 Spawning of the American Oper Gore virginica, at Bictreme we Levels (Plate 45) ANTHONY! CALABRESE & HARRY, ©. DAVISuseiseeies Se a EE O35 [Continued on Inside Front Cover] Distributed free to Members of the California Malacozoological Society, Inc. Subscriptions (by Volume only) payable in advance to Calif: Malacozool. Soc., Inc. Volume 12: $18. Domestic; $19.- in the Americas; 19.50 in all other Foreign Countries Single copies this issue $12.-. Postage extra. Send subscription orders to Mrs. JEAN M. Cate, 12719 San Vicente Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90049. Address all other correspondence to Dr. R. STOHLER, Editor, Department of Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720 Second Class Postage paid at Berkeley, California ConTENTs — Continued Invertebrates Taken in Six Year Trawl Study in Santa Monica Bay Joun/ Gy CARMISEE sti ae Sry Fy chiara Uh WN 26%] Pelecypod — Sediment Association in Tomales Bay, Colina (1 eee 3 Tables) Don Maurer . . . . 243 Studies on the Mytilus oa Communion in Atartos iBese leaieamel - IV, Sexsonal Variation in Gametes from Different Regions of the Bay (5 Text figures; 1 Table) Donavp R.- Moore & DoNALD J. REISH = 72 =) 2 2 Se oO Two New Cypraeid Species in the Genus Erronea uaa 46) CrawFrorpD N.CaTteE. . . : . 256 Growth Study in Olivella eRaete (oman, ness) G Manan I Text foure) RupoLtF STOHLER . . . 259 Distribution of Organic Bromine Compounds: in A Dyes dalifoniea Coma 1863 (1 Text figure) Linpsay R. WINKLER . . . . 268 Quantitative Relationships Between Gill Number Respiratory Seb, and Chit Shape in Chitons (6 Text figures) Kay M. JoHNson . . 5 Bye Recognition of an Eastern Bacibe Messina in he Comiline icine fea England and its Biogeographic Significance EUGENE V.'GOAN 3s 0 ot D ieee Sake AO 2 EI ee ee oa 07 NOTES & NEWS .. . . eee eid re Saat an EEE Duke Wig 6: PISO A Color Variation of Aldisa sanguinea (1 Text figure) RicHarp A. ROLLER Two New Records of Cratena abronia STEVEN J. Lonc What is Macoma truncaria Datu? (1 Text figure) EucENE V. Coan Spawning Notes, II. — Mitra dolorosa (3 Text figures) Fay H. WoLFson Littorina littorea in California (San Francisco and Trinidad Bays) James CarLToNn Revision of “Introduced Mollusks of Western North America” JaMEs CARLTON METHODS & TECHNIQUES .. . MT ee MERT CS fer es. 8 Ge) A Method of Tagging Mollusks Wnderwater, (1 Text figure) RicHarp J. RosENTHAL A Method of Color Preservation in Opisthobranch Mollusks Gorpon A. RoBILLIARD BOOKS; PERIODICALS) &PAMPHIEEAS) 202 sete eee tee Cea 2 Oy Note: The various taxa above species are indicated by the use of different type styles as shown by the following examples, and by increasing indentation. ORDER, Suborder, DIVISION, Subdivision, SECTION, SUPERFAMILY, FamiLy, Subfamily, Genus, (Subgenus) New Taxa WoleeliliNon3 THE VELIGER Page 153 Maturation of Gonads of Oysters, Crassostrea virginica, of Different Geographical Areas Subjected to Relatively Low Temperatures ' BY VICTOR L. LOOSANOFF Pacific Marine Station, University of the Pacific, Dillon Beach, California 94929? Bureau of Commercial Fisheries, Biological Laboratory, Milford, Connecticut and 06460 (Plates 19 to 25) INTRODUCTION THE QUESTION OF PHYSIOLOGICAL VARIANTS in,natural populations of a species has interested biologists for a long time. The problem was well summarized by PrRossER (1955) who stated that, regardless of the general interest, the variations in physiological characters of races, or sub- species, have rarely been studied systematically. This lack of research is unfortunate because a comparison of phys- iological adaptations and requirements of closely related forms should contribute much to the understanding of intraspecific relations. Prosser, nevertheless, named sev- eral criteria used in distinguishing subspecies, and indi- cated that the response to temperature was one to be considered. My article deals with several aspects of gon- adal development of oysters, Crassostrea virginica (GME- LIN, 1791), of widely separated geographical areas, subjected to several different, relatively low temperatures. The existence of physiologically different groups within the general population of Crassostrea virginica was first suggested by Coe (1934) during his studies of alternation of sexuality of these oysters. Long before Coer’s statement was made, however, practical biologists noticed certain differences among the oysters of different areas of the Atlantic Coast. For example, Wetts (1925), who dis- cussed this matter at some length, stated that an oyster planter of New England or New York would prefer ' This study was supported in part by National Science Foundation Grant No. GB-5250 2Present address: 17 Los Cerros Drive, Greenbrae, California 94904, U.S.A. oysters originating in certain locations: “Today a bushel of seed from the famous Bridgeport bed will command double the price of Delaware or Chesapeake seed” (p. 19). Several years later, in studying spawning of Long Island Sound oysters LoosANOFF & ENGLE (1942) con- cluded that this population was not homogencous in its spawning behavior but consisted of different groups, per- haps races or subspecies, some of which required a higher temperature than others for completing matura- tion of their gonads and initiation of spawning. This opinion was shared by STauBER (1947, 1950) who, using information available in the literature on spawning of oysters of different areas, came to the conclusion that there are probably several physiologically different races within the general population of C. virginica of our Atlantic Coast. The question remained speculative until LOOSANOFF & Nomeyjko (1951) presented the first evidence on the dif ference in temperature requirements for gonad matura- tion in several groups of Crassostrea virginica. These authors, working with oysters that originated in Massa- chusetts, Connecticut, New Jersey, and Virginia, demon- strated that, even though all the mollusks were of the same species, the temperature requirements for gonad development and successful spawning of the northern groups were lower than for groups living in warmer, southern waters. Preliminary examination of data based on new and much more extensive studies, in which samples again represented populations of different areas of our oyster producing belt from the Gulf of Mexico to Cape Cod were used, supported the original conclusion (LoosanorrF, 1958a). Moreover, it is now generally ac- Page 154 cepted that there are physiological subspecies in Ostrea edulis Linnazus, 1758 (Korrinca, 1957) and Crass- ostrea gigas (THUNBERG, 1793) (Imai & SaKat, 1961) which differ in their responses to environmental factors. Recently, Harman (1964) working with two groups of oysters, one indigenous to Long Island Sound and the other to James River, Virginia, offered additional evi- dence, based on chromatographic studies of intraspecific serological differences in C’. virginica. A year later the same author (HiLttman, 1965), using oysters representa- tive of Long Island Sound, Delaware Bay, several sections of Chesapeake Bay, Virginia, and Louisiana, further demonstrated inherent metabolic differences among the populations. MATERIALS anp METHODS This article is based principally on the results of experi- ments performed and material collected while I was at the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries Laboratory, Milford, Connecticut. Additional material has been collected, how- ever, and practically all microscopic examination and study of about 1500 histological preparations of gonads of oysters, as well as the analysis of the data, have been completed more recently, since I became associated with the University of the Pacific Marine Biological Station at Dillon Beach, California. Some of the oysters used in these studies came from Long Island Sound. Others were shipped from New Jersey, Virginia, North Carolina, and Florida. All oysters were mature and were 3 to 6 inches long. Except for the ~ lot from Florida (which was sent on November 5), they were shipped to Milford during the second half of Sep- tember or early in October after, or near the end of, the spawning period. The sources of the different lots of oysters were as follows: Long Island Sound, dredged in Milford Bay at a depth of about 30 feet; Miah Maull, New Jersey; the lower part of York River, Virginia (where the salinity is about 21 ppt); the vicinity of the State Laboratory near Bears Bluff, South Carolina; and Apalachicola Bay, Florida. Upon arrival the oysters were suspended in wire trays in Milford Harbor to recover from shipment and to complete the extremely complex physiological processes taking place in their bodies at the end of the spawning pe- riod. These processes include the resorption of gonads and accumulation of glycogen and other reserve materials before the oysters begin hibernation (Loosanorr, 1942). They remained in the Harbor until the middle of Janu- ary and then were transferred to the laboratory and THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 placed in trays through which sea water of different temperatures was running at a constant rate. Approximately 48 hours after the oysters were placed in Milford Harbor samples of gonads of all groups were taken for histological studies. All samples came from the same anatomical portion of the oyster, namely, the right side behind the line passing through the stomach on a level with the lower edge of the palps. In this way ana- tomical uniformity of the samples was assured. The blocks of gonadal tissue were carefully removed with a sharp razor blade to avoid pressure that could distort the tissue and produce various artifacts. The tissue was pre- served in Bouin’s solution and later processed by stand- ard histological methods, sectioned at 5, and stained with iron-hematoxylin and eosin. REACTIONS or OYSTERS To DIFFERENT TEMPERATURES PRELIMINARY CONDITIONING AND EXPERIMENTAL ARRANGEMENTS Examination of the Long Island Sound oysters, made approximately 48 hours after they were placed in Mil- ford Harbor, showed that they were nearing completion of, or had completed spawning, and many had virtually undifferentiated gonads. In this group, resorption, which follows spawning, had been completed and the oysters were accumulating glycogen and other reserve materials (Plate 19, Figure 1). A few individuals, nevertheless, still contained small quantities of spawn. Gross examination showed that the meats were healthy and all oysters had crystalline styles and food in their stomachs. The New Jersey oysters were not as far advanced as the Long Island Sound group; they had more individuals in the late stages of gonad resorption (Plate 19, Figure 2). The majority of these oysters, nevertheless, had already completed resorption and were approaching winter con- dition. All oysters contained large quantities of glycogen, and crystalline styles and large quantities of food were found in their stomachs. The Virginia oysters were, as a rule, in the final stages of gonad resorption or already displayed winter-like gon- ads, although a few individuals of both sexes still con- tained different quantities of undischarged sexual prod- ucts. Many oysters contained large quantities of glycogen (Plate 19, Figure 3). This observation suggests that a lack of this material could not be the reason for the failure of Virginia oysters to develop gonads later in the season when they were subjected to the conditioning THE VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 3 [LoosanorF] Plate 19 Ly al ay , : VRS Y * ¢ «J pS Figure 1: Gonad of a typical Long Island Sound oyster late in September after completion of spawning. The thin gonadal layer is confined between the body wall of the oyster and the tubules of the digestive diverticula. The small, undifferentiated gonadal fol- licles are surrounded by large cells of connective tissue containing glycogen. Later in the season, when the oysters have accumulated more reserve material, the glycogen-gonadal layer will become much thicker. (X 125) Figure 2: Gonad of New Jersey female oyster late in September still containing some eggs that will soon be either discharged or resorbed. (X 125) Figure 3: Gonad of Virginia oyster late in September. The small, newly formed gonadal follicles are surrounded by large masses of connective tissue. (X 125) Figure 4: Gonad of South Carolina male oyster late in September still containing a large quantity of undischarged spermatozoa. (% 125) Y, i eh Y t i lh if = T ¥ 1 THE VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 3 [LoosanorFF] Plate 20 mf mo} lee 3 I 4 Lt tw ¥, 5 A : ? ae: ’ ee NOE beh. ENE Figure 6 Figure 5: Gonad of Florida oyster collected on November 15. Gonadal follicles are virtually absent and a large portion of the entire area is occupied by leucocytes. Part of genital duct is visible. (X 125) Figure 6: Gonad of Virginia oyster collected on January 15 con- taining small, undifferentiated follicles and large quantities of glycogen-laden tissue. (X 125) Figure 7: Gonad of South Carolina oyster collected on January 15. (X 125) Figure 8: Gonad of one of the most advanced Long Island Sound female oysters conditioned for 45 days at 12° C. (X 125) 4 i ‘ i i FEL i; , , é a ) y i A, 7 i ‘ { f B diy " 7 7 ; \ Vol. 11; No. 3 THE VELIGER Page 155 methods employed at Milford Laboratory (Loosanorr, 1945; LoosanorF & Davis, 1950). The South Carolina group was distinctly different from the 3 others described. Nearly all oysters still contained large quantities of spawn, and some appeared entirely unspawned (Plate 19, Figure 4). All were feeding well; their stomachs contained large quantities of food and all had large, well developed crystalline styles. The first examination of the Florida oysters showed that they were in a much poorer condition than any of the previously described groups. They were “watery”, and contained little glycogen or gonadal tissue (Plate 20, Figure 5). They had almost no gonadal follicles and the area between the digestive diverticula and the body wall was often filled with leucocytes or phagocytic cells. The presence of large numbers of these cells was characteristic of this group of oysters. Regardless of their poor condi- tion, these oysters were feeding, although their crystalline styles were thin and their stomachs usually contained much less food than was found in the oysters of the other groups. All groups remained suspended in Milford Harbor un- til January 15, at which time the bottom temperature was 3° C. Then, the oysters were brought into the labor- atory, cleaned, and placed in trays of running water the temperature of which was about 5° C. The next day the temperature was increased to about 8° C and the oysters began to receive, as supplementary food, a mixture of phytoplankton grown in a tank of about 3000 liter capac- ity (LooSANOFF & ENGLE, 1942 b). All groups of oysters brought into the laboratory on January 15 were examined to ascertain their pre-experi- mental physical condition. The Long Island Sound oysters were in excellent condition, containing large quantities of glycogen; their gonads were in typical winter stage. The New Jersey oysters were in the same condition but contained even larger quantities of glycogen. The Vir- ginia oysters were also in typical winter stage with un- differentiated gonadal follicles. None carried unspawned cells and, as a rule, all individuals had sufficient glyco- gen for normal development of gonads (Plate 20, Figure 6). Although the South Carolina oysters still contained much spawn in September, by January 15 it was either entirely discharged or (more probably) resorbed in all individuals. Therefore, at the beginning of the condition- ing experiments these oysters were in about the same physiological state as those of the 3 northern groups, since these South Carolina oysters also contained suffi- cient quantities of glycogen for development of gonads (Plate 20, Figure 7). The Florida oysters differed radically from all other groups because, with the exception of a few individuals whose glycogen reserve was probably adequate (although considerably less than that of the other groups), the majority displayed a very thin glycogen-gonadal layer in which a few winter-like follicles were imbedded. Large numbers of blood cells were present throughout the bodies of these oysters, much the same as is shown in Figure 5, Plate 20. No individuals were found, however, with un- spawned eggs or spermatozoa. The general plan of the experiments was to hold some oysters of each geographic group at temperatures of 12°, 15°, 18°, 21°, and 24°C. = 1°C for different periods to determine the number of days required for maturation of their gonads, including the stage when the oysters become so ripe that they can be induced to spawn (LoosanorrF, 1945; Loosanorr & Davis, 1963). In all trays the water temperature was increased gradually to the desired level to avoid possible physiological shock to the oysters. Positions of the trays were randomized and all trays received the same quantity of water and plank- ton food. Enough oysters were left in reserve for repeti- tion of the experiments, if necessary, or for studies of the behavior of the oysters at higher temperatures. The pres- ent article discusses the observations made at compara- tively low temperatures, namely, 12°, 15°, and 18°C =e Ile (@, In evaluating the condition of the oysters of the dif ferent groups, especially those of Florida, it was antici- pated that many might be heavily infested with parasites, such as Bucephalus, or disease-causing forms, such as Dermocystidium. Because these organisms may adversely affect gonadal development, it was decided to base final conclusions only on those oysters which, upon microscopic examination, showed no easily recognizable parasites. It was realized, nevertheless, that even this precaution to achieve a fair approach in estimating the gonadal devel- opment was not entirely reliable because the numerous microorganisms that may affect oysters are not fully known. Nevertheless, the decision to base conclusions on only those oysters that appeared healthy helped, undoubt- edly, to estimate more fairly the condition of the experi- mental animals. Two criteria were used to evaluate the rate of gonad development. The first consisted in determining the num- ber of days required, at a given temperature, for 50% of the oysters in the sample to develop physiologically ripe spermatozoa or fertilizable eggs. Attainment of this state was ascertained by examination of gonadal material from each oyster as it was dissected. This material was suspended in a small quantity of sea water and examined Page 156 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 under a microscope to determine whether it contained eggs or sperm. Gametes of the opposite sex were then added to determine if those of the examined oyster were physiologically ripe. The sex cells for this test were always taken from the oysters conditioned at a temperature of about 24° C and known to be entirely ripe. The second criterion, applied chiefly to higher tem- peratures not discussed in this article, was to determine the length of the conditioning period necessary at each temperature before 50% of the oysters in a sample could be induced to spawn. This test was accomplished by plac- ing each oyster in an individual container and then stimu- lating it to spawn by a rapid increase of water tempera- ture to about 28° C or 30°C, and by simultaneous addi- tion of a suspension of gonadal material taken from ripe oysters. Normally, each sample, especially those taken for final examination, consisted of 50 individuals. These groups will be discussed in geographic order, the northern oysters being considered first. OBSERVATIONS AT 12° C On March 4, after 45 days of conditioning at 12° C, the Long Island Sound oysters were again measured and examined. All showed new growth and some, whose total length was near 100 mm at the beginning of the experi- ment, had grown as much as 10mm. The meats were good and the thickness of the gonadal layer varied from 0.5 mm to 1.0 mm. All stomachs contained food and crys- talline styles were present. None of the oysters of this group spawned when sub- jected to thermal and chemical stimulation. A later histo- logical examination of the gonadal tissue showed that none were ripe and that many still had typical winter gonads characterized by small follicles containing virtu- ally undifferentiated cells. Nevertheless, some advanced females possessed ovocytes measuring up to 30, although most of the cells in the follicles were considerably smaller (Plate 20, Figure 8). After a total of 50 days of condi- tioning at 12°C a larger number of females had ovo- cytes measuring between 25 and 30p, and in some males gametogencsis had progressed to the stage of formation of spermatids or, possibly, even a few spermatozoa. Even though the thickness of the gonadal layer of the most developed oysters was 1.5 mm, none could be induced to spawn. The next group of Long Island oysters was examined after being kept for 61 days at 12°. They were subjected to spawning stimuli, by slowly raising the temperature of the water and holding it near 30° C for 2 hours, and by the addition of spermand egg suspensions. None spawned. Histological examination of the gonad showed that the oysters varied greatly in degree of ripeness. Some females contained many eggs measuring 45, but the majority had unripe gonads in which the largest ovocytes were only about 15 in diameter. Spermatozoa were found in several males (Plate 21, Figure 9). None of the ripe eggs of the normal females, to which sperm of the 12° C males was added, were fertilized, however, even though the sperm remained active for at least 2 hours. It was also noted that most of the spermatozoa suspended in the water were still connected by the heads in groups of 2 or 4, probably because they were not entirely ripe. Some of the eggs taken from the most advanced females were fertilized by sperm that came from males conditioned at a temperature of 24°C. Fertilization occurred but none of the eggs developed into straight-hinge larvae. The first spawning of the male oysters conditioned at a temperature of 12°C was induced after 68 days. Spawning began when the temperature in the spawning dish reached 28°C. Discharged spermatozoa were ap- parently normal because they fertilized the eggs of fe- males conditioned at higher temperatures; the eggs de- veloped into normal straight-hinged larvae. The male spawned for 22 minutes, discharging a large quantity of spermatozoa. A female was induced to spawn after 78 days. Initially, I attempted to induce spawning in this group merely by adding sperm and egg suspensions to the 12° C water in which the oysters were conditioned. When none of the oysters responded after 1 hour, the temperature was rap- idly increased; when it reached 23°C, 15 minutes later, the first female responded. It was the only female that spawned in the group of 49 oysters. The eggs released were fertilized with normal sperm. Many embryos de- veloped into abnormal larvae, which never progressed beyond the trochophore, but some reached the normal straight-hinge stage. Thus, experimental evidence was ob- tained that certain Long Island Sound oysters can be conditioned to ripeness at a temperature as low as 12°C. Histological examination of the gonads of the oysters used in the spawning experiment after 78 days of condi- tioning showed that about 80% contained either large numbers of apparently normal spermatozoa or some fer- tilizable eggs (Plate 21, Figure 10) in contrast to the smaller groups that still had essentially winter gonads (Plate 21, Figure 11). This difference may indicate, as already suggested by LoosANorr & ENGLE (1942a), that the population of Long Island Sound is not genetically homogeneous. The New Jersey oysters and the more southern groups were kept under the same experimental conditions as THE VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 3 [LoosanoFF] Plate 21 a , xy) Figure 12 Figure 9: Gonadal follicle of Long Island Sound male oyster kept for 61 days at 12°C. The follicle contains ripe or nearly mpe spermatozoa. (X 575) Figure 10: Gonad of Long Island Sound female oyster conditioned for 78 days at 12° C. This individual, one of the most advanced of the group, contains some ripe eggs. (X 125) Figure 11: Gonad of Long Island Sound oyster showing almost no development after conditioning for 78 days at 12°C. The small follicles, just beginning to differentiate, are surrounded by large quantities of connective tissue. (X 125) Figure 12: Gonad of one of the most advanced New Jersey oysters conditioned at 12° C for 67 days. Note small, undeveloped follicles and large quantities of connective tissue. Genital duct is visible. (X 125) Tue VE.icrEr, Vol. 11, No. 3 ed is “ 4 Figure 15 ; | Figure 16 Figure 13: Gonad of New Jersey female oyster conditioned at 12° C for 78 days. (X 125) Figure 14: Gonad of one of the most advanced Virginia oysters conditioned for 78 days at 12° C. (X 125) Figure 15: Gonad of South Carolina oyster conditioned for 78 days at 12°C. (X 125) Figure 16: Gonad of Florida oyster after 78 days of conditioning at 12°C. (X 125) [LoosaNnorF] Plate 22 y S o + 7 %, - oa 2» \ : a c =! ond “ \ i by 12 Vol. 11; No. 3 those described for Long Island Sound oysters, but the New Jersey group was not subjected to spawning stimuli until the 67" day of conditioning because microscopic examination of the gonadal material before that day always showed the absence of ripe cells. Regardless of slow ripening, the New Jersey oysters were healthy, their meats containing a large quantity of glycogen. In some the thickness of the gonadal-glycogen layer exceeded 1.5 mm. Practically all showed new shell growth; often more than 10mm had formed since the beginning of conditioning. Food and crystalline style were usually present. After 67 days of conditioning the oysters were subjec- ted to a temperature between 25° C and 30° C for over 24 hours and to regular chemical stimulation, but none spawned or made the rhythmic shell motions character- istic for females which are ripe or nearly ripe. Examina- tion of the gonadal material revealed the presence of neither spermatozoa nor recognizable ovocytes. Histolog- ical examination showed that even the most advanced individuals still possessed typical undeveloped winter gon- ads (Plate 21, Figure 12). The New Jersey oysters were again subjected to spawn- ing stimulation after 78 days of conditioning. None re- sponded after being kept at a temperature of 25°C to 30° C for about 24 hours. A few ovocytes measuring as much as 25 in diameter were present in about 20% of the oysters (Plate 22, Figure 13). Strangely enough, not a single ripe male was found. None of the ovocytes taken from the most advanced females could be fertilized. Clear- ly, the New Jersey oysters were not yet ripe. The advent of spring was making it so difficult to keep the oysters at 12° C that the experiment was terminated at this time. The Virginia oysters still possessed winter gonads even after 78 days of conditioning at 12° C. The 50 individuals that constituted the sample included only 2 with a few ovocytes, the largest less than 25 in diameter (Plate 22, Figure 14). The males of this group were also obviously too immature to be able to spawn. Again, the experiment had to be ended because of the approach of spring. After 61 days of conditioning the South Carolina oysters differed from those of the first 3 groups by being much poorer. This condition was characterized by the small quantities of glycogen and by the thinness of the gonadal layer which in the South Carolina oysters was almost undetectable; in most it was between 0.0 and 0.5mm. Morcover, these oysters grew much more slowly than the northern oysters; the best showed an increase in length of only about 5mm, and at least half of the oysters showed no new growth. After 6/7 days at this temperature the conditions remained practically the THE VELIGER Page 157 same; there was no increase in gonadal thickness and the oysters remained unripe. The same situation prevailed on the 78" day of con- ditioning when the experiment was terminated. The sexes still could not be easily ascertained and the thickness of the gonadal layer remained at 0.5 mm or less (Plate 22, Figure 15). The final gross examination showed that the meats remained watery until the end. These oysters grew poorly or not at all. Approximately 75% had no crystalline style or food in their stomachs. Since, as is shown later, the South Carolina oysters conditioned at 15° C and 18° C contained crystalline styles and had food in their stomachs, it may be assumed that these were absent in the oysters kept at 12° C because the tempera- ture was too low for normal feeding. The Florida oysters resembled those of South Caro- lina in appearance and behavior. Throughout the con- ditioning period of 78 days they remained watery and poor and displayed a thin gonadal layer of only about 0.5mm or, more commonly, even less. They also grew much more slowly than the oysters from the 3 northern areas but, nevertheless, somewhat better than those from South Carolina. At the end of the experiment no recog- nizable sex cells could be found in gonadal smears and, as is shown in Figure 16 (Plate 22), even the best specimens were in retarded condition. As in the South Carolina group, more than 3 of the Florida oysters had no crystal- line styles or food in their stomachs. Obviously, the Flor- ida oysters could not reach ripeness at 12°C even after about 24 months of conditioning. OBSERVATIONS AT 15°C Previous observations on the behavior of Crassostrea vtr- ginica at low temperatures have shown that Long Island Sound oysters can be conditioned to ripen and induced to spawn at a temperature of 15°C (LoosANOFF «& Davis, 1952). Nevertheless, these oysters were included in this experiment primarily to serve as the control for the more southern groups. When, after 45 days of conditioning, the Long Island Sound oysters were exposed to spawning stimuli about 60% of them responded. Histological examination showed, however, that although many males spawned, a large portion of the sex cells in their gonadal follicles was still unripe (Plate 23, Figure 17). Females with well- developed but not fully ripe gonads were also common (Plate 23, Figure 18). Abnormalities, principally mani- fested by the presence in the gonadal area of a large number of phagocytes, were observed in some oysters. Page 158 The spawning experiment was repeated with Long Island Sound oysters conditioned for 50 days. About 70% spawned, many females discharged several million eggs each. These eggs, fertilized with the spermatozoa of males also conditioned at 15° C, developed into normal larvae. Gross examination of the oysters showed that they were in good condition, having gonads that aver- aged slightly more than 1 mm in thickness. The follicles, nevertheless, still contained large numbers of immature sex. cells. Soon after the above-described experiment a natural, unprovoked mass spawning occurred in all 15°C trays containing Long Island. Sound oysters. Since we already knew that these oysters can spawn at 15°C, it was not entirely unexpected. Because these oysters had a long history of conditioning at a relatively low temperature, however, it was decided to use them in auxiliary experi- ments in which an attempt was made to induce spawning by chemical stimulation alone at a temperature as low as 12° C. In the first experiment 15 oysters conditioned for 59 days at a temperature of 15° C were placed in water of 12°C. After being held at this temperature for 2 hours a suspension of ripe sex products was added to the water. None of the oysters of either sex responded to this stimulation even after a 2-hour contact with the sex cells. In another experiment a second group of 15 oysters, conditioned at 15° C for 68 days, was placed in water of 12°C and treated as were the oysters used in the first experiment. After being kept at 12° C for 1 hour and 10 minutes none spawned or showed any response to stimu- lation. Then, the temperature was slowly increased; when it attained 13.2°C one male began to spawn copiously. This, to the best of my knowledge, is the lowest tempera- ture at which the American oyster, C'rassostrea virginica, has ever been seen to spawn. Possibly, other oysters of this same group would have spawned also if a natural spawning had not occurred in the trays containing this group only 3 days before this experiment. The New Jersey oysters conditioned at 15°C were, throughout the experiment, in excellent physical con- dition, containing a larger quantity of glycogen than any other group. The oysters also grew well and, after 45 days of conditioning, their new shell growth averaged about 5mm. Microscopic examination of smears of the gonadal material, and histological studies showed that all except 2 of the oysters of this group possessed virtu- ally undifferentiated winter gonads. Even the most ad- vanced males were in the early stages of gametogenesis and still had only small gonadal follicles (Plate 23, Figure 19). None of the oysters spawned upon stimulation. THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 About 2 weeks later, after 60 days of conditioning, the oysters were examined again. Most still possessed undeveloped gonads, but one female contained a few fer- tilizable eggs. Only a few ripe spermatozoa could be de- tected in the most advanced male, and nearly all of the cells still remained in the earlier stages of spermato- genesis. After 72 days of conditioning 20% of the New Jersey oysters could be recognized as females in early stages of ovogenesis. In only 1 of 25 oysters could some of the stripped eggs be fertilized and, in general, the oysters in this group were unripe; most still displayed almost winter- like gonads (Plate 23, Figure 20). The experiment was terminated on that date. The remaining oysters were in excellent condition. Until the very end of the experiment the oysters fed vigorously, discharging large quantities of normal true feces. None of the Virginia oysters conditioned at 15°C showed much progress at the end of 45 days. After 60 days, however, one male contained a few motile sperma- tozoa although most of them were connected by their heads, indicating that they were still not ripe. The rest displayed virtually winter gonads. After 70 days of con- ditioning none of the 25 oysters examined possessed either ripe sperm or fertilizable eggs. Histological prepa- rations of gonads of these oysters showed that at the end of the conditioning period, which extended for 72 days, even the most advanced males were still far from being ripe; the follicles were undeveloped and small (Plate 24, Figure 21). It is probably significant that, contrary to conditions observed in the Virginia oysters kept at 12° C, about 75% of those subjected to 15°C contained well-developed crystalline styles and large quantities of food. This dif ference may indicate, as previously mentioned, that the group of Virginia oysters, with which we dealt, could not feed efficiently at 12° C, whereas the temperature of 15° was high enough for them to feed actively. At the end of the experiment the meats of the Virginia oysters were still good and contained large quantities of glycogen. Approximately 40% of the oysters did not show any new shell growth, however, a condition which was contrary to that recorded for the 2 northern groups where the oysters showed considerable increase in shell length. The South Carolina oysters differed radically in their general condition from the oysters of the 3 more northern areas. Samples of 50 oysters examined on the 60™ and 72° days of conditioning showed that only about 20% of the individuals were in good condition, possessing a glyco- gen-gonad layer about 1 mm thick; 26% were medium poor (gonadal layer of only 0.5mm), and 54% were Tue VELIcER, Vol. 11, No. 3 [LoosanorrF] Plate 23 Figure 18 > ery e hats he Fs. 4d r 4 s + i : Ae ey pe we 4 - wy ie yb ’ ‘ y ‘ LS - ” Ag 4 iy Fie 3 ah Se a 2 ~ a ey! Figure 19 Figure 20 Figure 17: Gonad of partially spawned Long Island Sound male oyster conditioned for 45 days at 15° C. (X 125) Figure 18: Gonad of Long Island Sound female oyster condi- tioned for 45 days at 15° C. Although the oyster is approaching ripeness, a majority of the cells in its follicles are still relatively small. (X 125) Figure 19: Gonad of New Jersey male oyster conditioned at 15° C for 45 days. (X 125) Figure 20: Gonad of New Jersey female oyster in early stages of ovogenesis, conditioned for 72 days at 15° C. (X 125) Vol. 11; No. 3 THE VELIGER Page 159 watery (gonadal layer so thin that it could not be ac- curately measured). Only about 38% of the oysters con- tained food in their stomachs and possessed crystalline styles; the rest had neither styles nor food. All the South Carolina oysters still displayed undevel- oped gonads after 60 days of conditioning. Even after 72 days only 1 male of the entire sample contained some sperm and only 2 females had recognizable small ovo- cytes. Because the rest of the oysters in the group were clearly immature (Plate 24, Figure 22), no stimulation of spawning was attempted. Of the entire Florida group of 50 oysters conditioned at 15°C for 72 days only 8 had medium good meats; the rest were either poor or in the still lower category known as “watery”. At the end of the experiment only 2 indi- viduals had a gonadal layer about 1 mm thick; 8 had a layer of approximately 0.5mm, and the remaining 40 oysters had no definite gonad. The thinness of the gonadal layer was characteristic of Florida oysters. Moreover, even this layer was usually invaded by a large number of leucocytes. In general, the gonads were so poorly developed that at the end of the long conditioning period the sex of most of the oysters could not be easily determined even in the histological preparations (Plate 24, Figure 23). Strangely enough, these oysters with poor meat grew well. Only 4 of 50 oysters showed no increase in length, and several showed an increment of more than 10 mm. Thirty percent con- tained food and crystalline style, but some individuals lacked a crystalline style although some food was found in their stomachs. OBSERVATIONS AT 18°C The temperature of the third series of observations is the one at which Long Island Sound oysters, living under natural conditions, can fully develop their gonads and spawn (LoosANoFF & ENGLE, 1940). It was not known at the time these experiments were begun, however, how the oysters of other geographic areas would behave at this temperature. Moreover, it was of interest to compare the behavior of Long Island Sound oysters at this tem- perature with that at 12°C and 15°C. Examination of the Long Island Sound oysters after only 15 days of conditioning at 18° C showed that their gonads were sufficiently developed to contain easily recog- nizable ovocytes or spermatids although, in general, the oysters were still unripe. After 21 days, however, occa- sional females already contained some mature, fertiliz- able eggs and many males had physiologically ripe sper- matozoa. Three days later the majority of the oysters contained either ripe sperm or eggs. Regardless of the presence of some ripe cells, the gonadal follicles of the Long Island Sound oysters were not fully developed at that time (Plate 24, Figure 24). Nevertheless, some oys- ters spawned when subjected to our usual method of stimulation. After 32 days at 18°C 75% of the oysters in the sample were ripe enough to spawn, while approximately 15% still contained immature, winter-like gonads. The New Jersey oysters exposed to 18°C differed radically from the Long Island Sound group of which 75% could be induced to spawn at the end of 32 days. Almost none of the New Jersey oysters, even the most advanced, contained easily recognizable sex cells (Plate 25, Figure 25) in 32 days. Strangely enough, this retarded condition prevailed even though the oysters contained much glyco- gen, fed well, and appeared healthy. A few fertilizable eggs or ripe spermatozoa were found in several New Jersey oysters after 51 days of conditiop- ing, but none of either sex could be induced to spawn. After 71 days the majority still displayed virtually undif- ferentiated gonads but, strangely enough, about 10% of them could be induced to spawn. Histological studies of the tissues of the unripe oysters clearly showed that, regardless of their retarded gonadal development at the end of the conditioning period, they were healthy and contained large quantities of glycogen (Plate 25, Figure 26). All Virginia oysters exposed to 18°C for 30 days pos- sessed undifferentiated winter-like gonads. Nevertheless, the generally good appearance of the oysters excludes the possibility that gonad development was retarded because of poor physical condition. Oysters examined after 51 and 58 days of conditioning also contained neither active sperm nor fertilizable eggs, and most displayed winter- like gonads surrounded by large quantities of glycogen- laden connective tissue cells. None could be induced to spawn. Even after 71 days at 18° C, when the experiment was discontinued, the most advanced females were still in the early stages of ovogenesis, containing follicles in which the largest ovocytes were only about 10m or 15p (Plate 25, Figure 27). No spermatozoa were found and none of the oysters composing the sample responded to spawning stimulation. Histological studies of the tissues preserved at the end of the experiment showed that large portions of the oys- ters’ bodies, frequently including the gonadal area, con- tained unusually large numbers of leucocyte-type cells. The exact nature of this phenomenon is not understood but even if it represented a pathological condition, it did not interfere with feeding; practically all of the oys- Page 160 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 ters contained food in their stomachs and possessed large, normal crystalline styles. Our lack of success in conditioning Virginia oysters for spawning during the winter was later shared by other investigators. For example, in a letter to me dated March 30, 1955, Dr. Jay Andrews of Gloucester Point, Virginia, wrote: “Could you send us a dozen oysters conditioned for spawning? We have been trying for two months to prepare Virginia oysters without success.” He was sent several dozen Long Island Sound oysters which were easily induced to spawn by our usual method in Dr. And- rews’ laboratory. During a recent conversation with Dr. Andrews, in January 1968, I was told that they still can- not condition their oysters for normal spawning, and that to culture the larvae of these oysters they still have to depend on stripping the gonads to obtain some ripe eggs that are later fertilized artificially. Since the Virginia oysters kept at 18°C failed to de- velop ripe gonads at this temperature even after 71 days, it was anticipated that the South Carolina oysters, a more southern group, would probably react in the same way. This expectation was strengthened by the previously re- ported observation that these oysters when kept at 15° C did not develop fertilizable eggs or sperm, had poor, watery meats and, typically, showed a near absence of glycogen in their tissues. Examination of the South Caro- lina oysters conditioned at 18°C clearly showed, how- ever, that these expectations were not justified because the meats of these oysters were considerably better than those of the 15°C group. This observation strongly sug- gests that a difference of 3°C within this temperature range is highly important ecologically and physiologi- cally because the South Carolina oysters feed and as- similate food much more efficiently at 18° C than at 15° C. Possibly 15° C is near the minimal temperature for the active feeding of this geographic group. Prob- ably a temperature of about 18° C for South Carolina oysters can be compared with the temperature level of approximately 10° C for Long Island Sound oysters, below which the water-pumping rate is significantly lower than between 12°C and 15°C (Loosanorr, 1958b). It should be extremely interesting to verify this possibility by repeating the experiments on rate of pumping of Long Island Sound oysters on the Virginia, South Caro- lina, and Florida populations. After 30 days at 18° C the South Carolina oysters still possessed undeveloped follicles. After 51 and 58 days at this temperature, however, some of them, unlike the Vir- ‘ginia group kept at the same temperature, showed well- developed gonads. Although none could be induced to spawn, some males had a few spermatozoa, and some fe- males had a few ripe eggs that could be fertilized (Plate 25, Figure 28). Strangely enough, nearly 50% of the oysters in this sample were still entirely undeveloped. They were not the poorest individuals; on the contrary, many of them showed a layer of connective tissue, con- taining glycogen, that was in excess of 1 mm. Oysters of both sexes were induced to spawn after 71 days of conditioning. The spawners represented only about 15% of the sample, but ripe sperm and eggs were found in other individuals that could not be induced to spawn. Again, about half the oysters were still unripe, displaying winter-like gonads. Samples from the most southern, or Florida, group of oysters exposed to a temperature of 18° C for a period of 71 days were examined macroscopically and microscop- ically on the 30™, 51%, and 71 days. All of them were poor, watery, and contained little glycogen. None showed even partially developed gonads and neither spermatozoa nor recognizable ovocytes could be seen in histological preparations. A common condition in these oysters was the presence of masses of blood cells in the area normally occupied by gonadal follicles. In general, these observa- tions showed conclusively that it was impossible under the conditions of the experiment to ripen the Florida oysters at 18°C even after 71 days of conditioning. DISCUSSION anp SUMMARY This article is the first comprehensive report on the prog- ress of gametogenesis of different populations of Crass- ostrea virginica subjected to low temperatures. It shows that groups of oysters from Long Island Sound, New Jer- sey, Virginia, South Carolina, and Florida, kept in Mil- ford Harbor, Connecticut, for about 3 months and then subjected to a long conditioning period at temperatures of 12°C, 15°C, or 18°C, displayed sharp differences in the stage attained in the development of their gonads. Some of the oysters that originated in Long Island Sound were able to ripen even at 12°C. After 68 days of con- ditioning at this temperature about 65% of these oysters contained either active spermatozoa or mature eggs. Spawning of one male was induced after this period and 10 days later a female also spawned. Some Long Island Sound oysters, therefore, can be brought to ripe condi- tion by being kept at a temperature of only 12°C. The New Jersey oysters and those of the more southern groups differed radically from the Long Island Sound oysters by being unable to carry on active gametogenesis at this temperature. As a rule, the gonads in most of these oysters were so poorly developed at the end of 78 days Tue VELIcER, Vol. 11, No. 3 [LoosanorF] Plate 24 Figure 23 Figure 24 Figure 21: Gonad of Virginia oyster conditioned for 72 days at 15° C. (X 125) Figure 22: Gonad of South Carolina oyster conditioned for 72 days at 15° C. (X 125) Figure 23: Gonad of Florida oyster conditioned for 72 days at iio (Oh, (X 125) Figure 24: Gonad of Long Island Sound female oyster condi- tioned for 24 days at 18° C. (X 125) Vol. 11; No. 3 that the sexes could not be easily distinguished even by microscopic examination of gonadal smears. The differences in the ability of the oysters of the different groups to ripen at the same temperatures were also clearly demonstrated at a temperature of 15°C. Again, the Long Island Sound oysters ripened compara- tively well under this condition, giving about 60% spawn- ers after a conditioning period of 45 days. Even after 72 days of conditioning, however, only 20% of the New Jer- sey oysters could be recognized as males or females and the majority possessed winter-like gonads. Only a single oyster had some eggs sufficiently developed to be fertiliz- able. The same condition existed with minor modifica- tions in the Virginia and South Carolina groups, and the Florida oysters were so poorly developed that no definite gonad was detectable in most. When exposed to a temperature of 18°C the Long Island Sound oysters again stood apart from the other groups. After 21 days of conditioning the majority of these oysters already contained ripe gametes. When these oysters were stimulated by exposure to higher tempera- ture, after only 24 days of conditioning, many spawned. On the other hand, none of the New Jersey group could be induced to spawn after 51 days of conditioning, and even after 71 days of conditioning at 18°C, most of the oysters in this group still contained virtually undifferenti- ated gonads, even though some could be induced to spawn. The Virginia oysters could not develop ripe gam- etes after being subjected to 18°C for 71 days. Strangely enough, after the same period of conditioning about 15% of the South Carolina oysters were ripe and could be induced to spawn, although about half of the individuals possessed such undifferentiated gonads that the sex could not be determined. The ability of a considerable percentage of South Carolina oysters to develop gonads at 18° C, although none of the Virginia group could, interrupted the other- wise orderly progression, from north to south, of the tem- perature requirements for gonad development of different geographical populations of Crassostrea virginica. An explanation for the unexpected behavior of this preco- cious fraction of the South Carolina population is not available at present. Moreover, these precocious few seem incongruous, considering that about 50% of the group failed to respond to conditioning at 18° C for more than a 2-month period. The possibility is suggested that the South Carolina oysters, even though, according to the sender, collected from the same area, were apparently of different genctic composition and thus resemble the ap- parent mixture of several distinct genotypes in the oyster population of Long Island Sound (Loosanorr, 1965). THE VELIGER Page 161 Nevertheless, causes other than genetic may be responsible for such differences in the gametogenic activities of the South Carolina oysters. Obviously, such atypical fractions of the general popu- lations, as in the samples of South Carolina oysters, make it increasingly clear that, in addition to histological and chromatographic studies of the oysters, to which refer- ences have already been made, it may be necessary to employ genetic studies to clarify that rather difficult problem. While I was still the director of Milford Labor- atory a program for genetic studies of bivalves was estab- lished, and at present experiments of this nature are being conducted by Dr. Arlene C. Longwell. According to Dr. Longwell, with whom I corresponded, “There is sufficient justification for the interesting speculation that genetic differences play a role in the differences in gametogenic activities of the South Carolina oysters exposed to the same temperatures which failed to elicit a response from the other southern groups studied.” The design of these experiments may be criticized on the grounds that the differences which I found among the groups of oysters of different regions may be due to the fact that the preconditioning period, extending roughly from the second half of September until the middle of January, was too short to allow the oysters to become ac- climated to the new environment. The matter of acclima- tion in mollusks, which was so ably discussed by SEGAL (1961), is still poorly understood, however. It can prob- ably be considerably clarified by conducting a series of experiments with successive generations of laboratory- reared oysters originating from parents of different geo- graphical areas to determine whether successive genera- tions of these oysters still fail to spawn in Long Island Sound. We had planned a series of these experiments in the past but, unfortunately, a heavy mortality of south- ern oysters in Milford Harbor during winters (especially Florida seed oysters of which almost 100% died) pre- vented completion of the research. Nevertheless, our preliminary studies definitely established that oysters that originally came as seed from different geographical regions and spent approximately 2 years in Milford Har- bor did not become acclimated even after that long period (LoosaNorF & Nomejxko, 1951). Additional observations of a similar nature were made on 150 New Jersey oysters shipped to me as seed by Dr. Thurlow Nelson in the fall of 1948. These oysters, which came from the Delaware River near Cape May, were attached to Mactra shells and were easily identifiable. They grew well and during the first winter showed no mortality whatsoever — indeed were the best of the 6 groups with which we were working at that time, excel- Page 162 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 ling even the Long Island Sound oysters which showed a mortality of 9%. In the fall of 1949 the average length of these oysters was 77.7 mm; in the fall of 1950 it was 92.8 mm; and in the late summer of 1951 it exceeded 12 cm. When these large, healthy oysters were examined in the fall of 1951 over 30% still contained nearly un- discharged gonads, and many others were in only parti- ally spawned condition. Thus, even after 3 years of exist- ence in Long Island Sound the New Jersey oysters, or at least a large portion of them, were unable to spawn. Still another evidence of lack of acclimation in oysters, which has already been briefly reported (LOOSANOFF & Nomeyjko, 1951), was found in a large shipment of native oysters from Seaside of Virginia, near Chinco- teague. These oysters were planted by F: Mansfield & Sons Company in comparatively shallow water in Long Island Sound south of West Haven. Our observations showed that these Virginia oysters, even after 3 years existence in the new environment, failed to discharge their gonads. These oysters, which, by general appearance and other peculiarities, were easily distinguished from those of Long Island Sound, went into hibernation each fall still re- taining all or at least large quantities of undischarged spawn, thus clearly demonstrating that they had not ac- climated to the new set of conditions. One more group of oysters transplanted to Long Is- land Sound that were unable to discharge their spawn in the new environment was that of several carloads of Crassostrea virginica shipped by EM. Flower «& Sons Oyster Company from the lower part of the Hudson River, the area between Hastings-on-Hudson and Tarry- town, and planted near the mouth of the Housatonic River, which enters Long Island Sound near Milford. We examined these oysters for more than 3 years and found that they also went into hibernation with undischarged gonads. This last transplantation is of special interest because it clearly demonstrates that distinctly different oyster populations, as far as their spawning requirements are concerned, may exist comparatively close to each other since the distance between the Housatonic River and the area of the Hudson River from which the oysters came is only about 70 miles. Perhaps the most striking evidence of the inability of some pelecypods to acclimate to the new conditions was offered by Davis (1955). He has shown conclusively in his experiments with Ostrea lurida CarPENTER, 1864, that the 6" generation of these oysters transplanted from Puget Sound to Long Island Sound could not survive New England winters, despite some selection, through the death of the most susceptible each year, before the remainder were brought into the laboratory during the coldest period. We may close this discussion by concluding that there are distinct populations of Crassostrea virginica that re- quire different temperature regimes for completion of gametogenesis and spawning. ‘This conclusion is based on the experiments described in this article, which were devoted to studies of the comparative progress of gam- etogenesis of oysters of different geographical areas kept in Milford Harbor for approximately 3 months and then subjected to conditioning at relatively low temperatures ranging from 12°C to 18° C. These observations support our earlier conclusion (LoosANoFF & NomEjxko, 1951) that Netson’s (1928) assumption that the breeding temperature is the same for C’rassostrea virginica over all parts of its range is incorrect. Moreover, the present ex- periments clearly indicate the existence of several phyiso- logical variants within the general populations of C. virginica. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank Dr. Harold Haskins of Rutgers University, Dr. Jay Andrews of Virginia Fisheries Laboratory, Dr. G. R. Lunz of Bears Bluff Laboratories, and Dr. Robert Ingle of ‘Tallahassee, Florida, for sending me the samples of oysters from their respective areas; Mr. Harry Davis of the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries Biological Labora- tory at Milford, Connecticut, for assisting in some of the studies; Miss Rita Riccia of the same laboratory for her assistance in the preparation of this manuscript, and Mr. Andrew Driscoll of the Pacific Marine Station, for pre- paring the photo-micrographs. I also thank the National Science Foundation for giving me the opportunity to complete these studies. LITERATURE CITED Cor, WESLEY ROSWELL 1934. Alternation of sexuality in oysters. 68 (716) : 236 - 251 Davis, Harry Cari Amer. Natur. 1955. Mortality of Olympia oysters at low temperatures. Biol. Bull. 109 (3) : 404 - 406 Hituman, Rosert E. 1964. | Chromatographic evidence of intraspecific genetic dif- ferences in the Eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica. Syst. Zool. 13 (1): 12-18 1965. | Chromatographic studies of allopatric populations of the Eastern oyster Crassostrea virginica. 6 (2): 115-116 Chesapeake Sci. Tue VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 3 [LoosanorF] Plate 25 ’ j a) bbe Ye! (74 7% ig BI SUPT Pome me Pid vas BLY e ae Re ” Figure 26 Figure 25:Gonad of New Jersey oyster conditioned for 32 days at 18° C. (X 125) Figure 26: Gonad of unripe New Jersey oyster conditioned for 71 days at 18° C. (X 125) Figure 27: Gonad of Virginia oyster conditioned for 71 days at 18° C. (X 125) Figure 28: Gonad of South Carolina oyster conditioned for 58 days at 18° C. Some ripe eggs were found in this individual. (X 125) Vol. 11; No. 3 THE VELIGER Page 163 Imat, Takeo « Seucut SAKAI 1961. Study of breeding of Japanese oyster, Crassostrea gigas. Tohoku Journ. Agr. Res. 12 (2): 125-171 Korrinca, PETER 1957. _\Water temperature and breeding throughout the geo- graphical range of Ostrea edulis. Ann. Biol. 33 (1-2): 1-17 LoosanorrF, Victor Lyon 1942. Seasonal gonadal changes in the adult oysters, Ostrea virginica, of Long Island Sound. Biol. Bull. 82 (2): 195 to 206 1945. Precocious gonad development in oysters induced in midwinter by high temperature. Science 102 (2640) : 124 - 125 1958a. Challenging problems in shellfish biology In: Per- spectives in marine biology, Part IV (1956), A. A. Buzzatti- ‘Traverso (Ed.), Univ. Calif. Press, Berkeley & Los Angeles, pp. 483 - 495 1958b. peratures. Some aspects of behavior of oysters at different tem- Biol. Bull. 114 (1): 57-70 1965. | Gonad development and discharge of spawn in oysters of Long Island Sound. Biol. Bull. 129 (3) : 546 - 561 Loosanorr, Vicror Lyon « Harry Cari Davis 1950. Conditioning V. mercenaria for spawning in winter and Biol. Bull. 98 (1) : breeding its larvae in the laboratory. ~ 60-65 1952. ‘Temperature requirements for maturation of gonads of Biol. Bull. 103 (1): 80-96 1963. Rearing of bivalve mollusks Jn: Advances in Marine Biology, EF S. Russet (ed.), Acad. Press, London 1: 1 - 136 northern oysters. Loosanorr, Victor Lyon & JAMEs B. ENGLE 1940. Spawning and setting of oysters in Long Island Sound in 1937, and discussion of the method for predicting the in- tensity and time of oyster setting. Bul. U.S. Bur. Fish. 49: 217 - 255 1942a. Accumulation and discharge of spawn by oysters living at different depths. Biol. Bull. 82 (3): 413 - 422 1942b. Use of complete fertilizers in cultivation of microor- ganisms. Science 95 (2471): 487 - 488 Loosanorr, Victor Lyon « GHartes A. NomMEJKo 1951. Existence of physiologically-different races of oysters, Crassostrea virginica. Biol. Bull. 101 (2): 151 - 156 Netson, THURLOW CHRISTIAN 1928. __ Relation of spawning of the oyster to temperature. Ecology 9 (2): 145 - 154 Prosser, Citrrorp Lapp 1955. Physiological variation in animals. Biol. Rev. 30 (3): 229 - 262 Seca, Earu 1961. Acclimation in molluscs. 235 - 244; 5 figs.; 4 tables Srauser, LEsuie A. Amer. Zoologist 1 (2) : 1947. On possible physiological species in the oyster, Ostrea virginica. Anat. Rec. 99 (4): 614 1950. The problem of physiological species with special ref- erence to oysters and oyster drills. | Ecology 31(1): 109-118 WEL Ls, WILLIAM FE 1925. Oyster investigations. Conserv. Comm., State of New York, Fourteenth annual report for the year 1924: 3 - 22 Page 164 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 A Review of the Living Leptonacean Bivalves of the Genus Aligena HAROLD W. HARRY Texas A&M Marine Laboratory, Galveston, Texas 77550, and Rice University, Houston, Texas 77001 (40 Text figures) IDENTIFYING A SPECIES OF Aligena from Galveston, which proved to be undescribed, led to the present review. I have reappraised all Recent species named in the genus or referred to it. Possibly other species will soon be found to belong here, for many of the descriptions and illustra- tions of leptonid bivalves in the literature are tantalizingly vague with regards to critical characters of the shell, and their generic allocations are questionable. I am grateful to Mr. Cornelius Mock and Mr. Charles Guice of the U.S. Bureau of Commercial Fisheries, Gal- veston, for aid in field work and much useful material. Dr. J.P. E. Morrison, Dr. Harald Rehder and Dr. Joseph Rosewater, as well as the whole staff of the Department of Mollusks of the U.S. National Museum were very generous in aiding my studies there. This study was sup- ported in part by National Science Foundation Grant GB 2753. Aligena H.C. Lea, 1846 The genus Aligena H. C. Lea, 1843, when proposed, con- tained but two species of fossil bivalves from the Miocene beds of Petersburg, Virginia, A. striata and A. laevis, both nude names with neither designated as type. Lea de- scribed these species in 1846. In his synopsis of the Lep- tonacea of North America, Dati (1899) designated “Abra aequata Conrab’ as type of the genus. The fol- lowing year he published a monographic account of Aligena (Dati, 1900: pp. 1175 - 1177), in which he noted that Conran’s species was originally named Amphidesma aequata Conrap, 1843, and that this is a senior synonym of Aligena striata H.C. Lea, 1846. Kelliopsis VERRILL & Busn, 1898, type by monotypy Montacuta elevata StimP- son, 1851, was considered a subjective synonym of Aligena by Dat. (1899, p. 895; 1890, p. 1175). In this he is probably justified, for the type species of Kelliopsis differs from the type of Aligena chiefly in being smaller, more quadrate, and in having weaker sculpturing. I have not had the opportunity to examine specimens of 2 other nominal genera based on Tertiary fossils of Europe, which Dati (1900) cites as congeneric (Laubriereia CossMann, 1887) or closely related (Spaniodon REUuss, 1867). Several additional living species have been added to Aligena in the twentieth century. Aligena cerritensis AR- NoLD, 1903 was described from a Pleistocene deposit in southern California and has since been found living, chief ly south of there. Aligena borniana Datt, 1908 from deep water in the mid-Pacific is dubiously a member of the genus, and A. pisum Datt, 1908, from the Strait of Magellan, is generically misplaced. Aligena cokert DALL, 1909 from Peru is a member of the genus, as is A. nucea Dat, 1913 from the Gulf of California. TueLe (1935) noted that Aligena differed so slightly from Montacuta that he was only doubtfully willing to recognize it as a subgenus therein. He pointed out that most living Aligena were on the shores of the American continents, but he also suggested, correctly, that Mont- acuta salamensis JAECKEL & THIELE, 1931 (in THIELE & JAeckeEL, 1931) from the east coast of Africa might be an Aligena, Two more species have recently been added to the list from the eastern Pacific, Aligena redondoensis T: BurcH, 1941, and A. borealis Cowan, 1964. For reasons noted below, these probably belong elsewhere. The nondescript bivalves which are usually cited in the superfamily Erycinacea or Leptonacea are so poorly known that the allocation of genera to families is a complex question, which cannot yet be fully decided. For the present we may place Aligena in the Montacutidae, and define the genus as follows. Vol. 11; No. 3 THE VELIGER Page 165 DEFINITION or THE GENUS Aligena Shell equivalve, small, 1 cm or less in maximum dimen- sion; color always uniformly white; shape various, but usually the height and length are about the same; umbos touching, slightly prosogyrous, located midway the length or behind it, or rarely before it. There is no lunule, escutcheon or corcelet. The dorsal margins do not project across the midline. Outer surface sculptured only with growth lines, which may be very faint, or moderately pronounced, regular in size and spacing or irregular in those characters. Adductor scars are about equal in size, subquadrate to suboval; the pedal retractor scars join the adductor scars above (or are separated from them slightly, perhaps depending on stage of growth). Pallial line simple, without sinus, joining the ventral end of the adductor muscle scars, usually with ragged margins, at least on the upper side, and often discontinuous in one or several places. Valve margin thin and smooth. Umbonal cavity deep, the hinge plate very narrow, usually with a finger-like tooth below the umbo in each valve, of which the right onc is slightly larger than the left. Lateral teeth are always absent. Ligament consisting of a thin, exter- nal part (tensilium) on the very margin of the shell following its curvature and extending before and behind the umbos, and a larger, straight, elongate internal part (resilium) which is entirely separated from the tensilium. The resilium extends in a straight line from immediately below the umbos for a moderate distance backward, and is therefore entirely opistodetic. Its attachments, or re- silifers, are usually buttressed by a moderate thickening of the shell, or chondrophore, often terminated behind in a sharp angle. The resilifers diverge outward and down- ward from the umbos, and thus the resilium is narrow in front, broader behind, with the form of an elongate tri- angle in ventral view. The ventral surface of the resilium may be calcified, forming a lithodesma. The protoconch is oval, smooth, large (about 0.3 to 0.4mm long) and remarkably persistent, being plainly evident in most large shells which are not worn. The periostracum is thin or moderately thick, light tan, usually with a smooth outer surface. It is only moderately persistent in most species. In some species there is a vague, shallow sulcus on the disc of the valve, running from the umbo to the mid- ventral margin, and a corresponding sinus in the latter. Such species are slightly reniform in profile. This sulcus and marginal sinus are found in several other gencra of the Leptonacea. The species of Aligena as presently restricted are ma- rine, mostly living from the lower tide level to shallow depths of perhaps 40 fathoms along the temperate and tropical shores chiefly of the American continents. One species of the Indo-Pacific fauna extends to greater depths. None are known from the eastern Atlantic or Antarctic faunas. Although a few species of Leptonacea may be free living, most seem to be commensal with burrowing in- vertebrates, chiefly crustacea, polychaete worms and echi- noderms. Nothing definite is known about the habits of most species of Aligena, but A. cokeri and possibly A. texasiana are probably polychaete associates. TYPE SPECIES oF THE GENUS Aligena Aligena aequata (Conran, 1843) (Figures 1, 2, and 3) Amphidesma aequata Conran, 1843. Proc. Acad. Sci. Phila- delphia 1:307. Not figured. Type locality: St. Mary’s Co., Maryland, and Wilmington, North Carolina. (Miocene) Aligena striata H: C. Lea, 1846, Trans. Amer. Philosoph. Soc., 28° Ser. 9: 238; pl. 34, fig. 13. Type locality: Tertiary beds of Petersburg, Virginia. (Miocene, fide DAL) Aligena acquata Conrap, 1843. Dati, 1900, Trans. Wagner Free Inst. Sci. 3 (5): 1175; pl. 24, figs. 8, 8a, 8b (of vol. 3, no. 4). The following description is based on a single left valve which is lot No. 144173 of the U.S.N. M. Paleontologi- cal Collection. It is labeled “St. Mary’s River, Md., Miocene.” Shell subtriangular, dorsal margins only slightly con- vex, of about equal length, sloping abruptly at about the same angle. Ends and ventral margin evenly rounded. Umbo moderately inflated, protoconch large (but too indistinct to measure), located midway the length of Figure 1 Aligena aequata Conrap. Hinge of the specimen, USNM 144173, from the Miocene of Maryland, which Dall studied Page 166 TRE WERIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 the valve, and slightly turned forward. Curvature of the disc even, slightly flattened over the middle, but with no trace of a sulcus, nor any appreciable expansion of the anterior slope. No lunule, escutcheon or corselet. Sculp- Figure 2 Interior of valve of same shell as Figure 1. Length 9.93 mm ture of numerous, closely spaced growth rests, of un- equal size, but periodically enlarged to form small con- centric ridges. Valve thin for its size, inner margin smooth. Hinge plate narrow, with a single finger-like tooth below the umbo in this, the left valve. The tooth projects well across the midplane. The resilial and tensilial parts of the ligament may have been completely separated, with the latter running along the very margin, where a nymphal roughening is evident. The inner part attached along a resilifer which begins below the umbo, and diverges ventrally and laterally. The chondrophore is very thickened, ending in a rounded point too far from the median plane to be a tooth. Length (extrapolating for the broken end) 9.93 mm; height 8.78 mm; semi-dia- meter 2.84 mm. Another lot, U.S.N.M. 112378, labeled “Aligena aequata Conrap from the Pliocene, Waccamaw River, South Carolina”, consists of a left and a right valve much Figure 3 Exterior of valve of same shell as Figure 1 better preserved than the lot from the Maryland locality. These valves are perhaps the ones figured by Dat, 1898, pl. 24, figs. 8, 8a, 8b. The ridges on the specimens are regular, but not quite as strong as he has shown them. They have no differentiated nymphal attachment for the tensilium, and the hinge plate is narrower than that of the valve from the Maryland Miocene. To evaluate the relationship of Aligena to Montacuta Turton, 1822, specimens of M. substriata MontTacu from the Jeffreys collection at the National Museum were studied. This species, originally named Mya substriata Montacu, 1808, is the type species of Montacuta Tur- TON, 1822 by subsequent designation of Gray, 1847. I have not seen Montagu’s work, but according to ForBEsS & Haney (1850, 2: 77), the species was published in the supplement, which appeared in 1808 (fide Parmer, 1958, js DZ). Montacuta substriata (Montacu, 1808) (Figures 4 to 7) The shell is minute (2.97 mm long, 2.84 mm high, 0.79 mm semidiameter), thin, obliquely ovate, with the anterior end longer than the posterior. The umbos are scarcely in- flated, touching, and essentially orthogyrous. The proto- conch is persistent, small and oval (0.125 mm long). Equivalve, with the disc moderately and regularly in- flated, somewhat polished, with a few widely spaced Figure 4 Montacuta substriata (Montacu). A specimen from Zetland in the Jeffreys collection (USNM 170517). Length 2.97 mm growth rests. Major sculpture is of 3 to 10 widely spaced, faint radial lines, slightly elevated, most prominent on the middle third of the disk and toward the ventral margin. Valve margin smooth and sharp; pallial line wide, without a sinus and with even margins, joining the Vol. 11; No. 3 THE VELIGER Page 167 adductor muscle scars at their lower ends. Adductor scars about equal in size, irregularly elongate, and with dorsal projections which are probably the scars of the pedal retractor muscles. Hinge short, with a single tooth in each valve. The teeth are rounded, elongated ridges be- ginning under the umbos and extending forward. That of the right valve is larger, and the tooth at the left Figure 5 Interior of same valve as in Figure 4 valve fits in a shallow, poorly defined socket in front of and above the right one. A tensilial part of the ligament, if present, must be small and without noticeable attach- ment on the shell. The resilium is a flat ribbon, its attach- ments beginning at the umbo and sloping downward and laterally. The mid-ventral part of the resilium isa calcified strip. Thus, the resilium is very similar to that of Aligena, which it also resembles in lacking lateral teeth, lunule and escutcheon. But these negative characters are outweighed by the differences between this species and Aligena aequata: Montacuta substriata is a much smaller shell, with small protoconch and umbos orthogyrous rather Figure 6 Interior of left valve of same shell shown in Figure 4 than prosogyrous. Growth striae are so poorly developed that the surface appears polished, whereas all species in- cluded in Aligena as here defined and limited, have moderate to prominent growth striae, giving the shell a silky texture, or even expanded to form concentric ribs. The pallial line in Montacuta is smooth and continuous, but the dorsal margin is ragged in all species of Aligena in which I have been able to study it. The radial sculpture of Montacuta is lacking in Aligena, and there is no finger- like projection of the teeth which are nearly always present in Aligena. Another species of the eastern Atlantic generally in- cluded in Montacuta, M. ferruginosa (Montacu, 1808), has finger-like cardinal teeth projecting normal to the median plane of the shell, as well as low lamelliform bases of these teeth, continuing forward along the hinge plate. This may be why Tutete (1935) included Aligena in Montacuta. Montacuta ferruginosa is an elongate shell, with smooth surface, smooth margined pallial line, small size and orthogyrous protoconch, thus showing similari- ties to M. substriata. Its resilium is somewhat shorter than in M. substriata, the attachments diverging down- ward and outward more abruptly, so that it approaches the transverse ligament of Mysella. The differences in anatomy of the soft parts between Montacuta substriata Figure 7 Ventral view of the hinge line of a shell of Montacuta substriata from the same lot as Figure 4, which had been fortuitously broken in such a way that the interlocking of the teeth and the resilium, with lithodesma, can be seen and M. ferruginosa as detailed by OLpFIELD (1961) are, when considered in conjunction with differences in the shell, sufficient to suggest that the two species may ulti- mately be placed in different genera. The loss of teeth may be a secondary character within the leptonid bivalves, which has occurred several times independently. At least one true Aligena, A. cokeri, is consistently edentate. We may suppose that ancestral pop- ulations may have had true lateral teeth (1.e. no pro- jections of one valve margin below the other) and a cardinal tooth in each valve which had an elongated base extending forward under the hinge margin, with a digiti- form projection normal to it at its umbonal end. The lateral teeth were lost in some later populations (including Montacuta and Aligena), the digitiform process lost in Page 168 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 M. substriata (but retained in M. ferruginosa), the elon- gate base lost in most Aligena, but not A. coker: and A. (?) borniana. Montacuta substriata and M. ferruginosa are the only two species recognized in that genus by WINCKworRTH (1932) in his list of British Marine Mollusca. A third species was included with doubt. According to ForBES & Hantey (1850), M. ferruginosa is known only from Brit- ish seas, and lives subtidally to at least 30 fathoms. Montacuta substriata was known to them from Britain and Scandinavia, but not southward. They report it from depths of 5 to 140 fathoms. Orprietp (1961) gave an extensive anatomical account of both species, and noted that they are commensals on sea urchins. Insofar as com- parison is possible, there are few significant differences in the anatomy of the soft parts of M. substriata and Aligena texasiana (see below). SPECIES or THE WESTERN ATLANTIC Aligena elevata (Stimpson, 1851) (Figures 8 and 9) Montacuta bidentata “Turton 1822” of Goutp, 1841, In- vert. Mass. Ed. 1, p. 59, not of Turron (whose species is Mya bidentata Montacu, 1803, now placed in Mysella) . Montacuta elevata Stimpson, 1851. Shells of New England, p. 16 (merely renamed the species misidentified by GouLp). Kelliopsis elevata Stimpson, 1851. VerRRILL & BusuH, 1898, Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., 20: 784; pl. 93, figs. 2-4; pl. 94, figs. 7, 8. Aligena elevata Stimpson, 1851. Dati, 1899, Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 21: 879, 884; 1900, Trans. Wagner Free Inst. Sob, 3) (@))e Jhl77 The shell is small (length 5.84 mm, height 4.75 mm, dia- meter 3.34 mm), equivalve, moderately inflated, oval to subtriangular, with the umbos moderately prominent, slightly closer to the hind end, and distinctly prosogyrous. The dorsal and ventral margins are only slightly convex, the front and hind margins more strongly rounded. The disc is evenly convex, with no median sulcus. Sculpture of fine, somewhat irregular growth lines, giving the shell a silky texture. There is a very thin, light tan periostracum. The protoconch is oval, about 0.4 mm long. The hinge line is narrow, with a prominent finger-like cardinal tooth, projecting normal to the median plane. The resilifer is typical of the genus, and a tensilium at- taches to the very margin of the shell over it. The dorsal margin of the broad, simple pallial line is ragged. Figure 8 Aligena elevata (Stimpson), interior of a right valve from Chelsea Beach, Massachusetts (USNM 159288). Length 5.81 mm Figure 9 Exterior of same valve as Figure 8 This species is represented in the National collection from 16 lots ranging from Massachusetts to Long Island, from the shore to 10 fathoms. Aligena texasiana Harry, spec. nov. (Figures 10 to 14) Shell small (length 4.81 mm, height 3.75 mm, diameter 2.50 mm), white, chalky, moderately inflated; equivalve, sculptured only with numerous, irregularly spaced, fine Vol. 11; No. 3 THE VELIGER Page 169 growth lines. Subtriangular to suboval or subquadrate, almost equilateral, the beaks being slightly closer to the hind end, but distinctly turned forward. The dorsal mar- gins are very slightly convex, the hind one somewhat shorter than the front one. Both the front and hind ends of the shell are evenly rounded, and of nearly the same Figure to Aligena texasiana Harry, spec. nov. Holotype. Length 4.81 mm convexity. They continue as a smooth curve into the ventral margin, which is almost straight, but shows a slight sinus midway its length, at the end of the sulcus. The region of the disc between the umbo and antero- ventral part of the margin is somewhat more inflated than the rest of the disc. From the umbo to the middle of the ventral margin is a shallow, vague sulcus, only prominent on the lower half of larger shells. The proto- conch is prominent, oval, about 0.348 mm in diameter. Figure 11 Aligena texasiana Harry, spec. nov. Holotype The umbos touch, and there is no lunule or escutcheon. The valves are thin, with smooth inner surfaces and mar- gins. Adductor scars are prominent, suboval, and about equal in size. Retractor scars are adjacent or confluent (depending on growth) with them dorsally. The pallial line is prominent, without sinus, and broken into a series of subtriangular marks probably representing discrete muscle bundles. The resilium is flattened, short, attached by its long edges to each valve, along a slight ridge just under the dorsal valve margins and behind the umbos. The resilial attachments descend and diverge posteriorly. The medial third of the ventral surface of the resilium is calcified along its axis. There is a single tooth in each valve, rounded and projecting slightly forward across the midline. The one in the right valve is larger, and passes in front of the left tooth. A thin, light tan periostracum on fresh shells gives them a satiny luster. Figure 12 Aligena texasiana Harry, spec. nov. Paratype, Length 5.13 mm Type Locality: East end of West Bay, Galveston, Texas. The holotype is USNM no. 679103. This species has been found only in West Bay and Lower Galveston Bay at Galveston. It was not found in more than 60 samples ranging from 3 to 18 fathoms offshore. Within the bays, it occurs from the lowest tide level to 7 feet, which is about the deepest water of the bays, outside of the passes and dredged channels. It seems to be only local within the bays, and is not common. Frequently polychaetes are abundant in the samples containing it, suggesting it may have some mutualistic relationship with them, but details are lacking. It also occurs with Mysella planulata, with which it is easily confused. The latter is more flattened, has opistogyrous umbos with a smaller protoconch, and is without a sulcus on the disc. PARKER (1959, pp. 2128- Page 170 WBE VEEIGER Vol. 11; No. 3. 2129) evidently confused them, labeling a figure of Alz- gena texasiana with the name “Mysella planulata” (l.c., figs. 21a, 21b). His specimens were from bays farther south on the Texas coast, but no exact localities are in- dicated. This species also occurs in Barataria Bay, Louisi- ana, where I recorded it as Aligena sp. (Harry, 1942). From Aligena elevata, this species differs in being gen- erally smaller, more inflated, and with a median sulcus on the disc. Aligena texasiana is perhaps closest to what I have called A. nucea Datu from the west coast of Mexi- co, but the latter is not as inflated and the sulcus is less prominent. The Texas species is smaller than A. cokeri, with the sculpture and sulcus not as prominent, and cardinal teeth seem always to be present. ANATOMICAL NOTES In the laboratory, Aligena texasiana is moderately active, extending the foot and pulling its body, resting on its side, up to it. It crawls up the vertical wall of the glass dish, and up large shell fragments, attaching itself very loosely by a minute byssal thread or two. In the active animal, the siphonal opening is not evident, and my study did not extend to the direction of water currents. The mantle margin is exposed along the edge of the shell only to show a row of minute, closely spaced papillae, scarcely longer than their diameter, uniformly distributed along the edge of both mantle lobes between the adductor muscles. Figure 13 Aligena texasiana Harry. Postventral view of an animal from which the shell has been decalcified Figure 14 Aligena texasiana Harry, spec. nov. Diagram of the superficial anatomy of a specimen from which the shell has been removed Symbols used in Figures 13 and 14: aad anterior adductor muscle ar anterior pedal retractor muscle d diaphragm f foot fl fused lamellae of mantle margin g gill im dorsal margin of ascending gill lamella k_ kidney Ip labial palp mr retractor muscle of mantle margin np nascent periostracum P periostracum pa posterior adductor muscle pr posterior pedal retractor muscle s siphonal opening (excurrent) vg visceral ganglion vh ventricle of the heart The flesh of the living animal internally is snow white, except that the liver is colored light brown, and the kidney is faint tan. A byssal gland is not evident in the living animal, but there is a groove along the keeled ventral margin of the foot. The foot is somewhat finger-shaped, although short and rounded when retracted. Studies on specimens preserved in 70% isopropyl al- cohol were made after the shell was dissolved in a very weak hydrochloric acid (2%) solution in alcohol of 70% strength. The outer, or true, periostracum is thin, transparent, light tan colored, with a roughened outer surface in harmony with the growth ridges of the shell. The free edge of this layer of periostracum is held firmly in the periostracal groove between the outer and middle lamellae of the mantle margin. Since the latter has re- Vol. 11; No. 3 THE VELIGER Page 171 tracted some distance from the shell margin, there is an abrupt turning of the outer periostracal sheet, along the line of the shell margin, and a wide strip of nascent peri- ostracum between it and the mantle margin. An inner periostracal sheet seems to adhere closely to the outer surface of the mantle in specimens deshelled in acid, but it was probably separated from the mantle by the innermost layer of calcareous material, the hypostra- cum. I therefore propose for this sheet of periostracum the name mesostracum. In Aligena texasiana it is smooth, tough, pliable, thin, and very faint tan colored. It seems to extend to the very margin of the mantle. The margins of the two mantle lobes are fused for a short distance below the posterior adductor muscle. The fusion is in the form of a thin, transverse sheet, with a large round hole at its upper end. This hole has a smooth margin and is the excurrent siphonal opening. The papil- lae extend along the sides of the sheet, and the two rows of them join above the siphonal opening. The mantle margin is thickened, but the rest of the mantle is very thin, almost transparent. Discrete bundles of retractor muscles can be seen in it, extending upward for a short distance, and originating on the valves of the shell along the pallial line. -The gills are represented only by a single huge subtri- angular demibranch on each side. There is no muscular suspensory septum. Each demibranch has about 50 fila- ments, the longest being anterior, and the others shorten- ing in length progressively toward the hind end. The lamellae are not pleated. They are eulamellibranchian, with firm inter-filamentary junctions orderly arranged horizontally to give the gill a latticed appearance (not shown in Figure 14). The free margins of the demi- branchs are grooved. The anterior filament of each is attached along the visceral mass throughout its length. The ascending lamellae are somewhat narrower than the outer, descending ones. They attach along the visceral mass in the front part of the gill, and behind it to each other. The hind tips of the gills do not reach quite to the siphonal opening, but there is a triangular, horizontal sheet of tissue extending from the hind tip of the gills to the fusion of the mantle lobes just below the opening. Thus, the mantle cavity is completely separated into in- current and excurrent chambers by a structurally com- plete diaphragm. The labial palps are minute triangles, which overlap only the first few filaments of the gill. The ventricle of the heart surrounds the rectum, the kidney is between the pericardium and the posterior adductor muscle. No internal detail of the viscera has been determined. On the surface of the visceral mass, there were a few low projections, which could as easily be interpreted as phenomena of contraction rather than as projections of the liver and gonads. The latter condition has been de- scribed in other leptonids (OLpFIELD, 1961). A specimen collected in early spring had several hund- red early embryos in the gills, but there was no evidence of embryos in specimens examined in June and July. OLDFIELD (of. cit.) describes a sequential shift in sexu- ality of some British leptonids. SPECIES or tHe EASTERN PACIFIC : Aligena cerritensis ARNOLD, 1903 (Figures 15 to 17) . Aligena cerritensis ARNOLD, 1903. Mem. Calif. Acad. Sci. 3: 138; pl. 13, fig. 3. Type locality: Los Cerritos (Signal Hill) near Long Beach, Los Angeles County, California. (Pleistocene) The following description is based on the holotype USNM 162529, a single right valve (Figure 15). Figure 15 Aligena cerritensis ARNOLD. Holotype, USNM 162529. Length 9.03 mm Shell large for the genus (length 9.03 mm, height 8.39 mm, semidiameter 2.58mm), obliquely ovoid, the pos- terior dorsal margin sloping downward at a greater angle | with the horizontal than the anterior dorsal one. The shell is unusually thick, and the inside of the disc, above the pallial line, has an irregular surface. The chevron- shaped origins of the pallial retractor muscle give the upper part of the pallial line an irregular appearance. These are actually engraved on the thickening of the disc. The adductor scars seem to be large and slightly kidney- Page 172 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 shaped. The resilifer is as in Aligena, and the shell ridge along it is large. There is a single, finger-like tooth in front of the ligament in this, the right valve, projecting normal to the midplane and across it. Outer surface slightly flattened over the middle of the disc, smooth, with only a few irregular growth rests on the lower third of the shell. No lunule or escutcheon. This species is living on the coast of Lower California and on the mainland opposite. Some of the 14 lots of Figure 16 Aligena cerntensis ARNOLD A Recent shell from “off Lower Calif? USNM 212588 to show the steep slope of the postdorsal margin. Length 5.63 mm this species in the National Museum have depth data, showing it occurs in from } to 5 fathoms, and in fine grey or black sand. It may occur with Aligena nucea. Fresh shells are rarely as thickened as the holotype. They often have a periostracum which is much thicker than on any other species of Aligena, and which may persist only over the lower third of the shell. It is brownish grey in Figure 17 Aligena cerritensis ARNOLD A Recent shell from Magdalena Bay, Lower California (USNM 217809) showing papillate periostracum over lower third of valve. Length 5.00 mm some shells, light tan on others, and usually has small triangular projections from its surface. Figure 17 is drawn from a Recent shell having such a cuticle. The protoconch is large. The shape is variable, and small shells are difficult to separate from A. nucea. The beak cavities are not as deep as in that species, there is never a sulcus on the disc, and the ventral margin is always slightly convex, never having a sinus. The umbos are always well toward the hind end of the shell. Aligena obliqua Harry, spec. nov. (Figures 18 to 20) Shell small (length 6.19 mm; height 6.19 mm, at right angle to length; diameter 2.38 mm; protoconch oval, 0.284 mm long), white, covered with a light tan, very thin periostracum. Moderately and regularly inflated, obliquely oval, with the margins evenly rounded. Equi- valve, inequilateral, with the umbos about a third of the Figure 18 Aligena obliqua Harry, spec. nov. Holotype, USNM 532795. Length 6.19 mm length from the hind end. Umbos only moderately in- flated, turned slightly forward, touching, with persistent protoconchs. No lunule or escutcheon. Sculptured only with growth striae, faint, close together, and mostly reg- ular, with occasional (3 on holotype) growth rests more prominently defined. The growth striae give the surface a silky texture. Valves of moderate and even thickness, margin smooth and sharp, adductor muscle scars very elongate oval, with the foot retractor scars confluent with their dorsal ends. Beak cavities deep, hinge very narrow. A single prominent finger-like tooth arises just in front of the umbo in each valve, projecting well across the midline. The tooth of the right valve is larger than that Wola ll: Nov 3 Figure 19 Aligena obliqua Harry, spec. nov. Holotype, interior of valve of the left, more directly under the umbo, and it passes behind the left when the valves are joined. Ligament with a thin, external part on the very margin of the shell, and of the same length as the resilial part. The latter begins under the umbo, its attachment slopes downward and laterally, for not quite half the distance from the umbo to the top of the posterior adductor scar. The ventral surface of the resilium is strongly calcified. The shell is thickened slightly along the resilial attachment. Holotype, USNM no. 532795, is from Bacochibampo Bay, Sonora, Mexico (Orcutt). This lot also contains 2 paratypes with joined valves and 10 disjoined valves. All are in fresh condition, showing little evidence of weath- ering. The distinctive shape of this species easily separates it from the other 3 living on the west coast. It is very similar Figure 20 Aligcena obliqua Harry, spec. nov. Dorsal view of a paratype from same lot as that of Figure 18 THE VELIGER Page 173 to Aligena minor Dat (1900, p. 1177, pl. 44, fig. 8), a Miocene species from North Carolina, which differs chiefly in being smaller, and not as oblique. The National Museum has 6 lots of this species, from Guaymas (Sonora) and Mazatlan (Sinaloa) on the main- coast of the Gulf of California. Depths are indicated on the labels as 4 to 14 fathoms, and substrate type of medium-coarse grey sand. Aligena nucea Dat, 1913 (Figures 21 to 24) Aligena nucea Dati, 1913. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., 45: 597. Not figured. Type locality: Gulf of California. Burcn, 1941, Nautilus 55: pl. 4, fig. 3 (photograph of holotype). Otsson, 1961. Panamic-Pacific Pelecypoda, p. 234; pl. The single left valve, which is the holotype of this species (USNM no. 267149), is probably a more extreme variant of the populations which I think constitute this species than is ordinarily found in populations of Aligena. A description of the holotype (Figure 21) is as follows: Figure 21 Aligena nucea Datu. Holotype, USNM 267149. Length 3.88 mm Shell small (length 3.88 mm, height 3.19 mm, semidia- meter 1.31 mm), the umbo is very slightly behind the midpoint of the length, slightly prosogyrous, and evident- ly touched the one opposite. Protoconch large, persistent as Figure 22 Aligena nucea Datu. Dorsal view of holotype but indistinct. Resilifer typical of Aligena, but unusually large and prominent. There is a single finger-like tooth just in front of the umbo. Sculpture of growth lines only, more prominent on the lower third of the valve. Disc THE VELIGER Page 174 Figure 23 Aligena nucca Datv. Interior of valve from Conception Bay, Gulf of California (USNM 558735). Length 5.63 mm curvature uniform, with no flattening or sulcus. Ventral margin evenly rounded, with the post-ventral part slightly flattened. No lunule or escutcheon. It differs from Aligena cerritensis of the same length in having a more swollen umbo, which is more centrally placed. Aligena obliqua of this size is already markedly oblique. From A. cokeri it differs in being dentate. Several lots of specimens have accumulated in the National Mu- seum since Dall named this species, which, though poorly represented by the holotype, seem nonctheless to be con- specific with it. Figures 23 and 24 are drawn from a valve of USNM 558735 from Conception Bay, Gulf of California. The shell is about equally rounded at both ends, with the ventral margin flattened, or more often with a slight sinus in the middle. There is usually a vague, very shallow and broad sulcus on the lower half of the middle of larger valves, and the anterior slope of the disc sometimes is slightly inflated. The texture is silky, formed by very fine, closely spaced and somewhat irregular growth lines. The cardinal tooth is always present. The umbos vary in position, may be slightly in front or slightly behind the midpoint of the length. Figure 24 Aligena nucea Datu. Exterior of same valve as in Figure 23 Vol. 11; No. 3 Eleven lots of this species at the National Museum are all from the Gulf of California, with depths indicated as 1 to 7 fathoms, and substrate as fine grey or black sand. Otsson (1961) notes it extends south to Nicaragua. Aligena cokert Datx, 1909 (Figures 25, 26) Aligena cokeri Datu, 1909. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 37: 155-156; pl. 28, figs. 5, 6. Type locality: “Attached to worm tubes thrown upon the beach of the lagoon at Capon, Peru.” Oxsson, 1961. Panamic-Pacific Pelecypoda, p. 234; pl. 33, figs. 6, 6a, 6b. Shell small (Holotype, USNM 207759, length 7.74 mm, height 6.45 mm, diameter 5.68 mm), very inflated, ends of about equal curvature, rounded, ventral margin only slightly curved, and with a rounded shallow notch in the middle, where the sulcus ends. Beaks strongly prosogyrous, slightly in front of the midpoint of the length. Proto- conch persistent and large (about 0.38 mm long, slightly oval). A vaguely defined, moderately wide furrow runs from the umbo to the midpoint of the ventral margin, is Figure 25 Aligena cokeri Dati. Holotype, USNM 207759. Length 7.74 mm scarcely evident on the umbones, becomes more pro- nounced on the lower 3 of the shell. Growth lines very prominent, standing up as small, sharp ridges, but some- what irregular, though closely spaced; the shells tend to be peculiarly maleolated in some places, with vague, ir- regular depressions and elevations. In other lots than the type, the growth-line sculpture may be very regular or nearly absent, and the depressions and elevations absent, or variously prominent. In some specimens from the northern part of the range, the growth lines are absent, the bumps and hollows so pronounced and numerous that one might almost proclaim it a different species, were there no connecting intergrades. The form may become Vol. 11; No. 3 THE VELIGER Page 175 subtriangular in these, and the sulcus on the disc be absent. The resilifer is typical of the genus; in some para- type shells with both valves connected, a tensilium is evi- dent, but this is scarcely more than a slight thickening of the periostracum, joining the valves over the resilium. The finger-like tooth of Aligena is absent in this species, Figure 26 Aligena cokeri Datu. Hinge of right valve of a syntype which has a slight, rounded ridge running forward from the umbos along the hinge. The ridge of the left valve is smaller than that of the right one. Neither ridge projects across the median plane. The edentulous condition was noted by Dati (1909) and Orsson (1961, pl. 33, fig. 6) has illustrated it with a good photograph. Besides the type lot, there are several others at the National Museum ranging from the Gulf of California to Panama. Some labels indicate depths of 1 to 4 fathoms. SPECIES or tHE WESTERN PACIFIC AND INDIAN OCEANS Aligena salamensis (JAECKEL & THIELE, 1931) (Figures 27 to 29) Montacuta salamensis JAECKEL & THIELE, 1931. Wiss. Ergeb. d. deutsch. Tiefsee- Expedit. 21 (1): 226; pl. 4, fig. 98. Type locality: Dar es Salam, 50 meters deep. Ture.e (1935) noted that this species from the coast of East Africa might belong to Aligena. Several lots in the National Museum from southeastern Asia seem to fit it, insofar as comparison with the meager description and figure of JAECKEL & THIELE (in THIELE & JAECKEL, 1931) allow comparison. Figure 27 Aligena salamensis JAECKEL & THIELE. China Sea, 230 fathoms, off Pratas Island. USNM 297075. Length 9.42 mm Shell small (length 9.42 mm, height 8.39 mm, semidia- meter 3.57 mm), very inflated, subquadrate in profile, with margins evenly rounded. Beaks about midway the length, turned forward, touching, the protoconch oval, large, smooth, and persistent. Ventral margin slightly sinuous, where the sulcus of the disc meets it. The sulcus is prominent only over the lower half of larger shells, and the anterior slope of the shell is slightly more inflated than the rest of the disc. Sculpture of closely placed growth lines of uniform size, which become coarser on the lower half of the shell. Figure 28 Aligena salamensis JAECKEL & THIELE. Dorsal view of valve drawn in Figure 29 Valve thin, margin smooth and sharp. The hinge has a large fingerform tooth projecting below the umbo; the resilial attachment slopes downward and outward from the umbo, and is buttressed by a thickening of the shell along it, ending in a prominent angle at the hind end of the resilium. Page 176 Young specimens are evenly inflated and almost circu- lar. They lack a median sulcus, and might be thought another species, were it not for connecting intergrades. The National Museum has 4 lots from the China Seas, off Pratas Island, ranging from 88 to 230 fathoms, and 7 lots from the Philippines, ranging from 10 to 37 fathoms. A Figure 29 Aligena salamensis JAECKEL & THIELE. A valve from 32 fathoms S.E, of Bantayan Island, Philippines (USNM 293038). Length 4.69 mm. This was drawn at twice the magnification of Figure 27 single lot from the Buton Strait, Celebes, is from 37 fathoms also. Most lots have only one or two valves, the maximum being six. All of the smaller shells are from the greater depths, but there are sufficient intergrades to demonstrate they are conspecific with the larger ones. These were collected in 1909 by the research vessel “Albatross.” This species seems to penetrate to greater depths than others in the genus, but its shell is very characteristic of Aligena in all respects. SPECIES INCERTIS SEDIS Aligena (?) borniana Datt, 1908 (Figures 30, 31) Aligena borniana Dat, 1908. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 43 (6) : 413; pl. 10, fig. 2. Type locality: Pacific Ocean, 16°32’ S latitude, 119°59’ W longitude, 2012 fathoms. Shell large for the genus (length 14.2 mm, height 10.3 mm, semidiameter 3.6mm; protoconch oval, about 0.44 mm long), elongate oval, the front and hind margins evenly THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 Figure 30 Aligena (?) borniana Day. Holotype, USNM 110585. Length 14.2 mm rounded and of nearly the same arc, the ventral margin almost straight. Valves inflated, of the same size, beaks about + the length from the hind end, prosogyrous and touching each other. Very closely spaced growth lines and a light tan peri- ostracum give the outer surface a silky texture. Growth lines are more prominent near the beaks than elsewhere. No lunule or escutcheon, but there is a narrow, vaguely defined sulcus on the posterior slope on the upper third of the shell only. The middle of the disc is slightly flat- tened, but shows no trace of a sulcus (contrary to Dall’s description). No evidence of a tensilium on the disjoined Figure 31 Aligena (°) borniana Datu. Hinge of holotype with resilium attached to left valve Vol. 11; No. 3 THE VELIGER Page 177 valves of the single available specimen, the holotype. The resilium is typical of Aligena, but seems not to have a calcified strip. The hinge line in front of the umbo is slightly thickened, more so in the right than in the left valve, but there is no finger-like projection, and neither thickening extends across the midplane. The adductor scars and pallial line could not be distinguished. The relatively compressed appearance of this species, its large size, the faint sulcus on the posterior slope, as well as the great depth at which it occurs, are characters which, if relatively insignificant, argue against this species being an Aligena. The lack of a projecting tooth typical of most species of Aligena is not significant, since A. cokeri has no such tooth. This might be placed in Mont- acuta, except for the large size and the faint posterior sulcus. The latter suggests a corcelet, and thus the Thya- siridae, but the shape is unlike that group. SPECIES REMOVED From Aligena Three species have been described as Aligena which belong elsewhere. Two of these are probably Thyasiridae: Aligena redondoensis T. Burcu, 1941 and A. piswm Dat, 1908. The third, A. borealis Cowan, 1962 may belong to that family. The three are sufficiently distinct from each other to merit being placed in separate genera. The smaller species of Thyasiridae may be covered with iron encrustation, a character which has not been found in Aligena, although it is known to occur in Mont- acuta ferruginosa (see OLpFIELD, 1961). The thyasirids, at least the smaller ones, are generally found at greater depths than most species of Aligena, and occur in cooler waters when living in shallow depths. A lunule, escutcheon and corcelet (see CarTErR, 1967, for a discussion of these characters) may occur in various combinations and mani- fest to varying degrees in the Thyasiridae, but they are absent in Aligena. Axinulus VERRILL & Busu, 1898 Axinulus (?) pisum (Datt, 1908) (Figures 32, 33) Aligena pisum Datt, 1908. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 43 (6) : 413. Not figured. Type locality: “Magellan Strait, in 61 fathoms.” Only the holotype of this species, a slightly worn left valve, is known. In a large series at the National Museum of unidentified shells dredged near the Philippines by the “Albatross,” there are a few valves which are very similar, if not identical (USNM 300962, Lagonoy, G., E. Luzon, Philippines, 569 fms.). The following description is based on the holotype. Figure 32 Axinulus (?) pisum DALL. Holotype, USNM 110715. Length 2.43 mm Figure 33 Axinulus (?) pisum Datu. Holotype, interior view Shell small (length 2.43 mm, height 2.69 mm, semi- diameter 0.82 mm), subcircular, white and opaque with a very light tan, thin periostracum to which no dirt is adhering. Umbo moderately inflated, and slightly proso- Page 178 gyrous. The protoconch is scarcely evident, but seems to be slightly oval, about 0.156 mm long. The curvature of the disc is regular, with no lunule, escutcheon, or corce- let evident externally. Surface almost smooth, showing only a few very faint growth rests. The valve is thin, its edge smooth, Adductor scars and pallial line not evident. There is a faint but distinct ridge, ill-defined but fairly broad, extending from the umbonal cavity near the pos- terior dorsal margin, very suggestive of a corcelet. Hinge plate narrow, with no evidence of a tensilium, but with a resilifer beginning just under the umbo and sloping downward and outward for a moderate length. A single irregular tooth is immediately below and in front of the umbo. The hind part of the tooth may be a broken, finger-like projection, but it appears to have several rounded bosses, one of which is on the top side. A triangular extension forward of this tooth has a moder- ately sharp ventral border, along which are several incised lines sloping upward and backward. Tomburchus Harry, gen. nov. in Thyasiridae Type Species: Aligena redondoensis T. Burcu, 1941. Shells small, oval, equivalve, inequilateral, with the umbos nearer the hind end, and prosogyrous. An escutch- eon is well defined by a sharp angle on the posterior slope, extending from the umbo to the hind end of the shell. No lateral teeth, but the postdorsal slope of the left valve extends under the margin of the right one. The left valve margin is also deflected under and just before the umbo, as a tooth-like lamella with bifid margin, passing under a small, rounded, tooth-like extension of the mar- gin of the right valve. Ligament superficial, but covered by a turned up margin of the shell, extending along the adumbonal half of the escutcheon. The genus is named in honor of Dr. Tom Burch, of a family whose several members have greatly stimulated and furthered the study of malacology. Tomburchus redondoensis (1. Burcu, 1941) (Figures 34 to 37) Aligena redondoensis T. Burcn, 1941. Nautilus 55: 50 - 51; pl. 4, figs. 5, 6, 7. Type locality: 75 fathoms off Redondo Beach, California, about latitude 33°38’50” W, longitude 118°26’30” N. The paratypes of this species cited by T Burcu (1941) as sent to the National Museum were misplaced and un- available to me when I studied Aligena there in 1968. Two lots of the National collection identified by Dr. A. THE VELIGER Vol. 11; Nor3 M. Keen and cited by T: Burch were studied instead. One of these, USNM 211882 (48 fms., off Santa Rosa Id., Calif.) has only a single very worn valve, but is possibly this species. The other, USNM 331216a (129 fms., off La Jolla, Calif), has two specimens which fit very closely the figures and description of Aligena redondoensis. The following description is based on that lot. Figure 34 Tomburchus redondoensis (T. Burcu) From 128 fathoms “off La Jolla, Calif” (USNM 331216a). Hinge of left valve. Length 3.10mm Shell small (length 3.10 mm, height 2.53 mm, semidia- meter 1.14 mm), oval, equivalve, inequilateral, with the umbos slightly closer to the hind end, moderately inflated and prosogyrous. Protoconch persistent, oval, about 0.158 mm long. Valves white, moderately inflated, sculptured only by fine growth lines, with a thin periostracum to which mud and iron deposits adhere tenaciously in a few places. The margin of the shell is formed by one contin- uous curve, somewhat more flattened anterodorsally and along the ventral margin, but closed by the more flattened segment of the postdorsal margin, which meets the vent- ral margin in a rounded angle, about halfway between the top and the bottom of the shell. (i Figure 35 Tomburchus redondoensis (T. BurcH) Top view of same valve as in Figure 34. The dashed line is the limit of the postdorsal margin inserted below that of the right valve No lunule is differentiated. A narrow, lenticular es- cutcheon is well defined by a sharp margin and deeply excavated surface, which is pinched up into a keel along the umbonal half of the shell margin. There is no corce- let. The ligament seems to consist of one piece, with the tensilium and resilium possibly fused. It is about } as Vol. 11; No. 3 long as the escutcheon, and attached to the inner side of the pinched up part of the shell margins. It is effectively concealed by this keel. There are no lateral teeth as such, but in the left valve the posterior half of the dorsal margin within the escutcheon is extended across the me- Figure 36 Tomburchus redondoensis (T. BurcH) Right valve of same shell as in Figure 34 dian plane, and bent slightly downward. It fits under the margin of the right valve, which does not cross the me- dian plane there. The margin of the left valve is also extended just before and under the umbo, as a flattened, bifid tooth. Seen from above, this “tooth” is narrow, elongate along the shell margin, with its free margin smoothly rounded. In the right valve there is a small, hemispherical extension of the shell margin, which does Figure 37 Tomburchus redondoensis (T. Burcw) Top view of a shell with valves joined, from same lot as Figure 34. Darkened areas are detritus not extend across the median plane, but fits in the notch of the tooth of the left valve. The adductor scars and pallial line could not be studied. A few lots of unidentified shells at the National Mu- seum, dredged near the Philippines by the “Albatross” in 1909, evidently are this species or a closely related one, but THE VELIGER Page 179 the present study could not be extended to include them. Another member of Tomburchus may be Axinus dubius DAUTZENBERG & FiscHER, 1897 (10: 215 - 216, pl. 6, figs. 18 to 21; renamed Thyasira dubia (DAUTZENBERG & FiscHer by DauTzenseErG, 1927: 312 - 313, pl. 8, figs. 35 to 38) from the Azores, but I have seen no authentic specimens. “Lucina” ferruginosa Forses, 1843, as described and figured by Forpes « HANLEy (1850, 2: 60 - 62, pl. 34, fig. 1) from Britain may also be of this genus. WincK- worTH (1932, p. 242) puts Forses’ species in Thyasira. VERRILL & BusH (1898, p. 793, pl. 87, figs. 7, 8) cite what may be the same species as “C'ryptodon (Axinulus) ferruginosus (ForBEs)”, but they give no description and the figure has insufficient detail. Odontogena Cowan, 1964 Odontogena borealis (Cowan, 1964) (Figures 38 to 40) Aligena (Odontogena) borealis Cowan, 1964. Veliger 7 (2): 108 - 109; pl. 20, figs. 1, 2. Type locality: Georgia Strait, British Columbia, Canada, 190 fathoms. The following description is based on the single paratype, disjoined valves of one shell, which is USNM 657130. Shell small (length 2.56 mm, height 2.37 mm, semi- diameter 0.63 mm), subcircular, resembling a minute Lucina, with slightly convex, long post-dorsal margin. The moderately convex shorter anterior margin meets the umbo in such a way as to give the dorsal margin a notched appearance. No lunule, escutcheon or corcelet. Inflated, and covered with a ferruginous deposit which had been mostly removed, to show a faint tan surface of silky texture with a few irregular growth lines as the only Figure 38 Odontogena borealis (Cowan). Paratype, USNM 657130 Length 2.56mm Page 180 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 sculpture. Beaks touching, slightly turned forward, about midway the length of the shell. Valves thin, the margin acute and smooth. Adductor scars and pallial line could not be made out. Hinge line very narrow, poorly mani- fest; ligament entirely internal, elongate, flattened, at- tached along its side to the valves, beginning at the umbos and extending a short distance behind; the attachments do not diverge posteriorly. Teeth two in each valve; these Figure 39 Odontogena borealis (Cowan) . Right valve of same shell as in Figure 38 are large masses, poorly defined, as are the sockets into which they fit. One tooth in cach valve is just under and in front of the umbo, the other is behind the ligament. Those in the right valve are bifid and receive in the vague groove thus formed a short rounded projection from the teeth of the left valve. The ligament does not appear to have a calcareous midstrip, but this could be a matter of age. Figure 40 Odontogena borealis (Cowan). Top view of shell in Figures 38 and 39 This species resembles Aligena of the east coast in type of ligament, general shape, texture and size of shell, and absence of lunule and escutcheon. The type of teeth, however, removes it from that genus, as characters in this group go, and the subgenus Cowan erected for it may be used unless an earlier name is found. LITERATURE CITED ARNOLD, RALPH 1903. The paleontology and stratigraphy of the marine Plio- cene and Pleistocene of San Pedro, California. Mem. Calif. Acad. Sci. 3: 1-420; plts. 1-37 Burcu, THomas ADAMS 1941. A survey of the West American Aligenas with a descrip- tion of a new species. The Nautilus 55 (2) : 48-51; plt. 4 Carter, Rosert M. 1967. On the nature and definition of the lunule, escutcheon and corcelet in the Bivalvia. Proc. Malacol. Soc. London 37: 243 - 263 Conrap, TimotHy ABBOTT 1843. Descriptions of a new genus, and of twenty-nine new Miocene and one Eocene fossil shells of the United States. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 1: 305 - 311 Cowan, Ian McTaccart 1964. A new species of the lamellibranch genus Aligena from western Canada. The Veliger 7 (2): 108-109; plt. 20 (1 October 1964) Dati, WitutAM HEALEY 1890-1903. Contributions to the Tertiary fauna of Florida. Trans. Wagner Free Inst. Sci. 3 (1-6): 1654 pp.; 60 plts. [part 4, 1898, and part 5, 1900, contain the data relevant to the present study] 1899. Synopsis of the Recent and Tertiary Leptonacea of North America and the West Indies. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 21: 873 - 897; plts. 87, 88 1908. Reports on the dredging operations off the west coast of Central America to the Galapagos, to the west coast of Mexico, and in the Gulf of California XIV. The Mollusca and Brachiopoda. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., Har- vard; 43 (6): 205 - 487; plts. 1-22 (October 1908) 1909. Report on a collection of shells from Peru, with a sum- mary of the littoral marine Mollusca of the Peruvian zoological province. Proc. U.S.N.M. 37 (1704): 147 - 294; plts. 20 to 28 (24 November 1909) 1913. | Diagnoses of new shells from the Pacific Ocean. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 45: 587 - 597 DauTzENBERG, PHILIPPE 1927. Mollusques provenant des campagnes scientifiques du Prince Albert 1*® de Monaco dans lOcéan Atlantique et dans le Golfe de Gascogne. Rés. Camp. Scient. Prince de Mo- naco Fasc. 72: 1 - 400; plts. 1-9 DauTZENBERG, PHILIPPE & HENRI FISCHER 1897. Dragages éffectués par L’Hirondelle et par La Prin- cesse-Alice. Mém. Soc. Zool. France 10: 139 - 234; plts. 3-7 Forses, Enwarp & SYLVANUS HANLEY 1848-1853. A history of British Mollusca and their shells. Van Vorst, London; 4 vols.; illustr. Vol. 11; No. 3 THE VELIGER Page 181 Goutp, Aucustus ADDISON Otsson, AxEL ADOLF 1841. | Report on the Invertebrata of Massachusetts, comprising 1961. Mollusks of the tropical eastern Pacific particularly the Mollusca, Crustacea, Annelida, and Radiata. Cambridge (printed for the legislature): i-ili+ 1-373; 15 plts. Gray, JoHn Epwarp 1847. _A list of the genera of Recent Mollusca, their synonyma and types. Proc. Zool. Soc. London (for 1847) 17 [part 15] (178) : 129 - 219 (November 1847) Harry, Harotp WILLIAM 1942. List of Mollusca from Grand Isle, Louisiana, recorded from the Louisiana State University Marine Laboratory, 1929- 1941. Occ. Pap. Marine Lab., Louisiana State Univ. 1: 1-15 Lea, Henry C. 1843. Descriptions of some new fossil shells from the Tertiary of Virginia. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. 3: 162 - 165 1846. Descriptions of some new fossil shells from the Tertiary of Petersburg, Virginia. Trans. Amer. Philos. Soc. 9: 229 - 274; plts. 34 - 37 Monracu, GrorcE 1803. Testacea Britanica or natural history of British shells, marine, land and fresh-water, including the most minute: systematically arranged and embellished with figures. Romsey (J.S. Hollis). pp. i-xxxvii + 1-606; plts. 1-16 Supplement (1808): 183 pp.; plts. 17 - 30 [not seen] OLpFIELD, E. 1961. The functional morphology of Kellia suborbicularis (Monracu), Montacuta ferruginosa (Montacu) and M. sub- striata (Monrtacu). Proc. Malacol. Soc. London 34 (5): 255 - 295 from the southern half of the Panamic-Pacific faunal pro- vince (Panama to Peru). Panamic-Pacific Pelecypoda. Paleont. Res. Instit. Ithaca, N. Y.: 574 pp.; 86 plts. (10 March 1961) PaLMER, KATHERINE VAN WINKLE 1958. ‘Type specimens of marine mollusca described by P. P Carpenter from the West Coast (San Diego to British Colum- bia). Memoir 76, Geol. Soc. Amer. i- viii + 1-376; plts. 1-35. New York, N. Y. (8 December 1958) Parker, Ropert H. 1959. Macro-invertebrate assemblages of Central Texas coastal bays and Laguna Madre. Bull. Amer. Assoc. Petrol Geol. 43 (9): 2100 - 2166 Stimpson, WILLIAM 1851. Shells of New England. Boston, 56 pp.; 2 plts. Phillips, Sampson & Co., THIELE, JOHANNES 1931-1935. Handbuch der systematischen Weichtierkundc. Jena, pp. 1 - 1154; 893 text figs. THIELE, JOHANNES & SIEGFRIED JAEGKEL 1931. | Muscheln der Deutschen Tiefsee Expedition. Wiss. Ergebn. d. deutsch. Tiefs. Expedit. “Valdivia”, 1898 - 1899 21 (1): 161 - 268; pits. 6-10 [pp. 1-110; plts. 1-5, reprint numbers] Turton, WILLIAM 1822, Conchylia dithyra insularum Britannicarum. MA Nuttall; 279 pp.; 20 plts. VERRILL, Appison & KATHARINE JEANNETTE BusH 1898. Revision of the deep-water Mollusca of the Atlantic coast of North America, with descriptions of new genera and species. WINCKworTH, RONALD 1932. The British marine Mollusca. 19 (7): 211-252 Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 20: 775 - 901; plts. 71 - 97 Journ. Conch. London Page 182 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 The Egg Capsules of Jenneria pustulata (Licutroor, 1786) with Notes on Spawning in the Laboratory CHARLES N. D’ASARO Institute of Marine Sciences, University of Miami', Miami, Florida 33149 (1 Text figure; 1 Table) INTRODUCTION Jenneria pustulata (LicHtTroot, 1786) is a brightly colored cypraeacean distributed in shallow water from ‘the southern end of the Gulf of California to Ecuador (Keen, 1958). It is a hardy species normally found in association with the stony corals upon which it feeds. The relationship of the species to other members of the superfamily is not well established. KEEN (of. cit.) believes the shape of the radular teeth and other ana- tomical characters can be homologized with those of Trivia; however, SCHILDER (1936) places J. pustulata in the Ovulidae (Amphiperatidae). Data on the structure of the egg capsule and the larval stages can add to the understanding of phylogeny in this species. METHODS Adult specimens of Jenneria pustulata were collected by Dr. E M. Bayer of the Institute of Marine Sciences, University of Miami, from Venado Island in the Bay of Panama in August, 1965. Of this material, a pair (female 18mm, male 13mm) were transported alive to the In- stitute, where they were maintained for three years. The specimens were kept in an aquarium with running sea water at ambient temperatures. Assorted coelenterates were also kept in the same aquarium. Stony corals, in- cluding Porites sp., Phyllangia americana MiLNe-Ep- warps & Haine, 1850 and Siderastrea siderea ELLIS & SoLANDER, 1786 were used as food. There was a marked preference for Phyllangia over the the other species; how- ever, all were eventually accepted. During the period of observation, which extended from January, 1967 to May, ‘ Contribution No. 955 from the Institute of Marine Sciences, University of Miami. This investigation was conducted under the auspices of the U.S. Public Health Service (GM-125-41-02). 1968, the animals were not disturbed and had a con- stant supply of food. The egg capsules and embryos were preserved in 10% sea water formalin. All drawings were made from pre- served material with the aid of a camera lucida. BREEDING HABITS © Spawning began when the water temperature exceeded 24° C for 3 to 4 weeks (Table 1). The breeding season at Miami extended from April to December. During this period, 20 egg masses were produced. The number of capsules deposited per spawning ranged from 14 to 233 with an average of 125. A total of 2495 capsules was produced. Copulation took place from about 4 days to minutes prior to the beginning of spawning. The female moved onto the walls of the aquarium away from the sediment before beginning to spawn. No capsules were found on the corals. During the annual period, this pro- cess was repeated approximately twice a month. Before selecting a site for oviposition, the female ex- amines the walls of the aquarium for several hours. After selection, an area slightly larger than the diameter of a capsule is cleaned of periphyton and other surface de- posits by the radula for about 8 minutes. Then the pro- podium is folded over the cleared area, and a capsule is passed from the oviduct down a ciliated groove on the right side. Transport involves about one minute, The propodial muscles knead the capsule while it is held in place. Glandular cells secrete a layer of adhesive which imparts the final shape. Cleaning begins again about 2 minutes before the capsule is completely attached. The whole cycle involves approximately 20 minutes. At this rate to produce the larger egg masses, oviposition must continue for at least 3 days. Brooding, as noted among related cypraeaceans by OsTerGAARD (1950), does not occur. Vol. 11; No. 3 THE VELIGER Page 183 Table 1 The Spawning of Jenneria pustulata at Miami, Florida Number of Capsules Date per Mass Bay Temperature (° C) January, 1967 0 21.51 February 0 21.5! March 0 22.0! April - 25.0! April 26 120 26.5 April 30 14 25.0 May 21 ye) 28.0 May 31 101 28.5 June 19 72 28.0 June 26 85 30.0 July 4 50 2 29.5 July 7 81? 29.0 July 20 99 3 30.0 July 22 643 30.0 July 28 79 30.5 August 7 192 29.0 September 3 169 30.0 September 18 111 29.5 September 25 110 29.0 October 22 205 25.5 October 27 ala 26.5 November 9 233 25.0 November 20 202 24.0 December 5 152 23.0 January 1968 0 Zs) February 0 20.0: March 0 21.5% April - DAs April 179 26.0 ™ = average; 7 = communal mass; 3 = communal mass There is some indication that communal spawning takes place in the natural habitat. In two instances, the parent returned to an egg mass several days after the initial spawning to deposit capsules (Table 1). In areas with dense populations, it is possible that several females will use the same mass. Communal structures can be identified during development by noting that the contents of the older oothecae have a uniformly darker pigment. THE EGG MASS Each cluster of oothecae forms a very irregular oval with a long dimension varying between 5 mm and 30 mm. The pustulate capsules are always placed in a single layer. When overlapping between adjacent structures occurs, only a small portion of the edge of each is in- volved (Figures 1 a, 1b). The escape aperture is never covered. Placement of the oothecae in the mass does not vary. The side with the aperture is always placed between 2 capsules in a preceding row. The arrangement of the capsules in long arcs reflects the movements of the parent during spawning. Imm Figure 1 The Egg Capsules of Jenneria pustulata a: dorsal view of 6 capsules from a typical egg mass. One capsule contains embryos. b: lateral view of 3 capsules. Oothecae of Jenneria pustulata are transparent, color- less, pustulate structures which are somewhat variable in shape. The basal outline of each capsule is roughly the shape of an obtuse triangle with rounded angles (Fig- ure 1 a). Occasional capsules, ovate or round in outline, are the result of the parent’s ability to mold the capsules into a compact mass. An oval suture in the membranes of the upper surface close to the obtuse angle marks the escape aperture. Indistinct sutures extending laterally from the aperture reflect the bilobed structure of the oviduct (FRETTER & GRAHAM, 1962). The average di- mensions of the capsules are: length — 2.3mm; width — 1.7mm; and height — 0.5mm. Individual oothecae Page 184 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 contain from 65 to 107 embryos and average about 90. The number of embryos per mass varied between 1 200 and 21 000 with an average of 11 200. The total seasonal production for the female was 224 500 embryos. Development is indirect, with the formation of a long-term planktotrophic veliger. The pinkish-brown pigment which appears in the capsules after about 4 days is the result of the development of a pigmented proto- conch. Hatching begins after 13 or 14 days and is com- pleted in 24 to 72 hours. DISCUSSION The egg masses of cypraeaceans have general characters which are very uniform within a given genus; however, in some families (as presented by KEEN, 1958) consid- erable variation does occur. ‘These variations are recon- ciled in part by suggestions to separate the groups with an echinospira larva (see FRETTER & GRAHAM, 1962). A number of cypraeids were examined by Lo Branco (1899), VayYSSIERE (1927), and OsTERGAARD (1950). A survey of these investigations and personal observations on the spawn of Cypraca spurca acicularis GMELIN, 1791, C. cervus LINNAEUS, 1771, and C. zebra Linnagus, 1758, have shown that the structure of the egg capsules in this family is very uniform. As noted by OsTERGAARD (of. cit.), brood protection is also a characteristic of the family. Erronea errones (LINNAEUS, 1758) (Narvarajan, 1958) has a layered egg cluster quite similar to that of Cypraca and also exhibits brood protection. The capsules of Trivia arctica (Monracu, 1803) and T: monacha (pa Costa, 1778), which were studied by Lesour (1932 a), differ greatly from those of their suggested close relative, Jen- neria pustulata, in that they are vasiform and are im- bedded individually in compound ascidians. Both species have a characteristic echinospira which does not occur in J. pustulata. In the Ovulidae, however, Simnia patula (PENNANT, 1777) (LeBour, 1932 b) has pustulate cap- sules arranged in a single layer like J. pustulata. Similar structure and placement is also found in another ovulid, Cyphoma gibbosum (LinNAEuS, 1758) (personal ob- servation ) . In conclusion, it can be stated that the structural ar- rangement and placement of capsules by Jenneria pus- tulata is most similar to the processes occurring in the Ovulidae and that a close relationship is implied. LITERATURE CITED FRETTER, VERA, & ALASTAIR GRAHAM 1962. British prosobranch molluscs, their functional anatomy and ecology. London, Ray Soc. xvi + 755 pp.; 316 figs. Keen, A. Myra 1958. Sea shells of tropical West America; marine mollusks from Lower California to Colombia. i- xi + 624 pp.; illus. Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, Calif. (5 December 1958) Lesour, Marie V. 1932a. The British species of Trivia: T: arctica and T: monacha. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 18 (2): 477 - 484 1932b. The larval stages of Simnia patula. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 18 (1): 107-115 Lo Branco, S. Journ. Mar. 1899. Notizie biologiche riguardante specialmente il periodo di maturita sessuale degli animali del golfo di Napoli. Mitt. Zool. Stat. Neapel 13: 448 - 573 NatarajAN, A. V. 1957. Studies on the egg masses and larval development of some prosobranchs from the Gulf of Mannar and the Palk Bay. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. B. 46: 170 - 228 OSsTERGAARD, JENS Matias 1950. Spawning and development of some Hawaiian marine gastropods. Pacific Sci. 4: 75 - 115 ScHILDER, FRANZ ALFRED 1936. | Anatomical characters of the Cypraeacea which confirm the conchological classification. Proc. Malacol. Soc. London, 22 (2): 75-112; 2 plts. VAYSSIERE, ALBERT JEAN BapTisTE Marie 1927. | Recherches zoologiques et anatomiques sur les mollusques de la famille des Cypraeidés. 2™° partie. Ann. Mus. Hist. Nat. Marseille, Zool., 21: 133 - 184; plts. 24 - 28 Vol il INows THE VELIGER Page 185 The Taxonomic Significance and Theoretical Origin of Surface Patterns on a Newly Discovered Bivalve Shell Layer, the Mosaicostracum GEORGE H. HAMILTON Department of Paleobiology, Division of Invertebrate Paleontology, Smithsonian Institution Washington, D.C. 20560 (Plates 26 to 38) INTRODUCTION THE STRUCTURE OF BIVALVE SHELLS has been studied with the light microscope at magnifications which allow for a point resolution of 0.2 micron. However, structures present in the shell which are consistent at the species level have not been resolved. The body of knowledge gained so far through use of the light microscope has shown that shell structure is taxonomically consistent to varying degrees at the ordinal level (NEWELL, 1965) and in some cases (i. e. Ostreidae) at generic through familial levels (GUNTER, 1950; CarPENTER, 1848; OBERLING, 1955, 1964; Boccitp, 1930). The two major advantages that the electron microscope technique offers are resolutions in the 10 A range and replicas that permit observation of finely structured sur- faces. Electron microscopic examination and an under- standing of calcification in the bivalve shell is still in preliminary phases. The body of knowledge is quite large but only a few of the major problems have been resolved regarding the mechanism of crystal growth and related organic components. Significant new discoveries and con- cepts of shell formation are still being made. An under- standing of the genetic control of the mode and product of calcification may furnish valuable new tools to biology and paleontology in the fields of systematics, ecology, phylogeny and evolution. Electron microscopic examination of the calcified outer surface in fossil and living bivalve shells has resulted in significant new discoveries concerning bivalve shell struc- ture. These potentially have an important bearing on taxonomy and the interpretation of phylogenetic relation- ships. A discrete, previously unknown calcareous layer, the mosaicostracum (Plates 26 to 38), between the ecto- stracum and periostracum of numerous, if not all Bival- via, and at least in some gastropods, has been defined and studied in detail on the Tellinidae. In this family, the mo- saicostracum is unique in that it displays patterns which are easily recognized and are definitive for each species (Plates 26 to 35). The most cursory examination of areas extraneous of the mosaicostracum shows many additional features of the shell useful in species recognition and pos- sibly new approaches to taxonomic description based on shell structure. In view of the large amount of data that has been obtained, this study is restricted to the mosaic- ostracum for the present inasmuch as it is apparently the most useful of the valve structures for taxonomic and phylogenetic studies. Other structures were observed in the ectostracum and mesostracum and will be considered in subsequent studies. Species recognition from the shell, whether it be whole or fragmented, presents a basic problem to the paleonto- logist and neontologist. The main purpose of this study is to examine the possibilities of species determination based on electronmicroscopic shell structures and to estab- lish control for the investigation of similar shell structures on fossil bivalves. Preliminary investigations indicate the preservation of the mosaicostracum in bivalves at least as old as the Late Cretaceous (Campanian). This study establishes a technique whereby the mala- cologist and paleontologist engaged in the study of bi- valves can solve problems inherent in the macromorpho- logical approach to taxonomy with the additional infor- mation gained by observations with the electron micro- scope at the ultramicromorphological level. The mosaic- ostracum and the whole study of microstructure adds a potent new tool to the systematic and phylogenetic study of the Bivalvia. Page 186 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 With the application of modern technology to classical problems in systematics some limit will emerge at which the evidence for species identification is reached. Those faunal elements which form mineralized components have given the systematist a most useful device to decipher the intricate code of evolution. If these mineralized com- ponents are studied at the ultramicromorphological level, then the limit of investigation should be the smallest set of organized structures that consistently, at the species level, can aid in a rigorous evaluation of patterns useful to the systematist. The patterns found on the mosaicos- tracum fit into this realm of evidence. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author gratefully acknowledges Dr. K. M. Towe of the Smithsonian Institution for the many stimulating con- versations and his liberal attitude toward the use of the electron microscope laboratory; Dr. E. G. Kauffman of the Smithsonian Institution for his constant encourage- ment, criticism and constructive advice; Dr. K. J. Boss of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard Uni- versity for his assistance in the taxonomy of the Tellini- dae; Dr. Joseph Rosewater of the Smithsonian Institution for allowing the author to use specimens of the Tellini- dae in the Division of Mollusks collection; Dr. P. E. Hare of the Geophysical Laboratory, Washington, D. C.; Mr. David Massie of the U.S. Geological Survey for his in- valuable aid in many of the problems connected with the photography; Mr. Larry B. Isham of the Smithsonian Institution for his help in preparing the plates; Mr. J. M. Jackson, now a graduate student at Yale University, for suggesting the Tellinidae as a group most fitting for the problem and for many discussions of the biology of modern bivalves. Explanation of Plate 26 Plan Views from Pt/C Single Stage Replicas of the Surface of the Mosaicostracum. xX 15000 Figure 1: Tellina (Tellina) radiata LinnaEus, 1758; USNM No. 598232 . Figure 2: Tellina (Moerella) salmonea (CARPENTER, 1864) USNM No. 108639 Explanation of Plate 27 Plan Views from Pt/C Single Stage Replicas of the Surface of the Mosaicostracum. % 15 000 Figure 3: Tellina (Laciolina) laevigata LINNAEUS, 1758 USNM No. 83334 Figure 4: Tellina (Laciolina) magna SpENGLER, 1798 USNM No. 36174 METHODS The mosaicostracum was detected when replicas of the outer shell surface of Brachidontes recurvus (RAFIN- ESQUE, 1820) were being examined in an attempt to iso- late the area of the valve where calcite exists. Initial observations of the outer surface revealed a type of calcification that was not continuous with the underlying shell structures. The nonconformity with the underlying ectostracum and the unique appearance of this layer incited further studies on other species of the family Mytilidae. It appeared that a systematic study of the layer may have implications on the problems of inter- preting shell structure as well as a possible tool for the recognition of shell structure differences at the species level. The family Tellinidae was chosen for a systematic study of the patterns on the mosaicostracum for the following reasons: 1. They are well represented in Recent and fossil bivalve assemblages. 2. They have world-wide distribution. Many species have broad geographic ranges spanning several biogeo- graphic provinces. 3. They are euryhaline, have a depth tolerance from the littoral zone to hundreds of feet and inhabit numer- ous marine environments (YONGE, 1949). 4. Large, relatively complete collections are in the Smith- sonian Institution. These had been utilized in a recent revision of the Tellinidae by Dr. K. J. Boss, Harvard University, and could therefore be relied upon to be taxonomically up-to-date and in good order. Boss’s systematics were employed in this study. 5. The species are infaunal and are commonly well pre- served in the fossil record. The Tellinidae are there- fore a group useful to the geologist in interpreting Explanation of Plate 28 Plan Views from Pt/C Single Stage Replicas of the Surface of the Mosaicostracum. 15 000 Figure 5: Tellina (Phyllodina) squamifera DESHAYES, 1855 USNM No. 461776 Figure 6: Tellina (Phyllodina) persica DALL & SIMPSON, 1901 USNM No. 161780 Explanation of Plate 29 Plan Views from Pt/C Single Stage Replicas of the Surface of the Mosaicostracum. x 15000 Figure 7: Tellina (Merisca) cristallina SPENGLER, 1798 USNM No. 530395 Figure 8: Tellina (Merisca) aequistriata Say, 1824 USNM No. 194658 Tue VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 3 [Hamitton] Plate 26 Figure 2 THE VELIcER, Vol. 11, No. 3 ne ¥ ‘ Me wr ! > Cec coh ) Ps a + zt} , Man Ys re a : - | furans ef ur > a ro yt . e, ~ ita oF, “2 [Hamitton] Plate 27 THE VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 3 [Hamitton] Plate 28 THE VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 3 [Hamiton] Plate 29 Vol. 11; No. 3 THE VELIGER Page 187 the species-substrate relationships not only from the paleoecologic point of view but also for correlation of ancient sediments. The specimens of Recent Tellinidae studied were ob- tained from the United States National Museum, Division of Mollusks collection. Fossils from USNM Department of Paleobiology were classified according to the recent work of Dr. K. J. Boss. The technique was basically that of Dr. K. M. Towe with modifications (Tower & CIFELLI, 1967). The specimens were soaked in a 5% solution of sodium hypochlorite for 30 to 60 days to remove the periostracum and an organic layer layer covering the mosaicostracum. The organic layer on different species required varying periods of time to dissolve. The smaller species were treated whole and the larger species were cored with an 0.25 inch diamond circular saw. The cores were treated separately from the whole shell. This technique prevented the complete destruction of the shell which could then be returned to the collection. The smaller species were crushed between two pieces of lens tissue while the cores were either broken in half or used whole. Following the bleach treatment the specimens were rinsed and soni- cated in de-ionized water, dried at room temperature and shadowed with carbon and platinum simultaneously at an angle of 45°. The coated specimens were decalcified in Na EDTA at a pH of 7.5 and rinsed for 30 minutes in HCl and NaClO with intermediate rinses in distilled water. The cleaned replicas, supported on copper grids covered with a parlodion film, were examined with an RCA EMU 2D electron microscope. The initial magni- fication of the micrographs was 2500 diameters which were recorded on 210 glass lantern slide plates and developed in Microdol-X to produce a fine-grained im- age. The micrographs were reversed and dodged onto Kodak Fine Grain Positive film with a Log Etronics con- tact printer in the full dodge position and then photo- graphically enlarged 6 diameters to give a final magni- fication of 15 000 diameters. A comparison of the pat- terns at magnifications of less than and more than 15 000 diameters proved unsatisfactory. Judgment as to opti- mum enlargement was determined by a comparison of the structures that form the patterns. Observation of the shell surface patterns was always executed at this mag- nification so that an objective evaluation could be made of the information on each specimen. Some of the smaller species could be replicated whole so that the entire surface of the valve was examined in the microscope without breaking up the continuity of the patterns over the surface. The replicas made from the cores were broken up into two or three pieces and then examined separately. No difference could be detected be- tween replicas made from the cores or the crushed specimens. DESCRIPTION oF THE MOSAICOSTRACUM The mosaicostracum, a calcareous veneer having an average thickness of 0.3, is defined as a layer between the periostracum and the ectostracum (Plate 36) and is continuous over the entire outer surface of the valve of bivalve mollusks. The thickness of this layer is uniform and apparently reflects the microscopic surface of the underlying ectostracum. This relief can be observed on some species (Plate 29, Figure 8; Plate 35, Figure 19). The remaining structures which can be seen only with the electron microscope form the most important features of the mosaicostracum and are unique to this layer. They are of the order of 0.5 and less in size, generally. Species of the family Tellinidae have megascopic shell surface architectures ranging from very smooth to one of coarse concentric ridges. However, the mosaicostracum is con- tinuous over the most pronounced ornamentation (Plate 36). Examination of replicas made of the entire surface of the valve confirms this situation for all of the species studied. There are variations in the distribution of the patterns, or the mosaicostracum may be lacking as a result of abrasion or minor defects due to handling of the specimens prior to this study (see Plate 38). The mosa- icostracum may be obscured by the occurrence of ran- dom features such as larger than average crystals or organic material insoluble in the bleach. From the features of the mosaicostracum it is possible to group the patterns into major categories: crystalline, pustular, linear, mosaic, and planar. Crystalline: Surface displays structures with geometric forms recognized as elements of crystal morphology which can be coarse, medium or fine (Plate 28, Fig- ure 6). Pustular: Blisterlike elevations of coarse, medium or fine pustules which may or may not have a crystalline appearance (Plate 29, Figure 8). Linear: Basically linear elements superimposed on a pus- tular, crystalline or planar surface (Plate 35, Figure 19). Mosaic: Planar surface broken by incisions or anastom- osing sutures and grooves (Plate 30, Figure 10). Planar: Basically flat surface with a generally smooth appearance (Plate 32, Figure 13). A definitive description of each category with the in- clusion of variations resulting from a compounding of smaller features will necessarily imply that there are Page 188 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 similarities between patterns. The categories are based on observations of the mosaicostracum at 15 000 diameters. Differences in magnification would change the informa- tion available for interpretation and thereby alter the position of the pattern in the categories. These catego- ries are tentative, proposed here only as an aid to illus- trate the differences between patterns. Future studies will undoubtedly expose new categories. In order to preserve the simplicity of approach to species recognition by observation of the patterns a de- scription will not be made of each species pattern. They are illustrated on Plates 26 to 35. The difference between patterns of species in the same subgenus is apparent, for example, in Plates 26 to 31, 33, and 35. In some rare instances the difference between patterns of species is subtle and an observation of greater areas of the shell surface is necessary before the pattern for the particular species can be recognized. Experience has shown that an absolute minimum of 3 separate valves or valve frag- ments of each species must be examined before confidence of new pattern recognition is achieved. Decisions were made on those patterns that appeared dominant or unique. An evaluation of the percent distribution of the pattern indicative of each species over the surface of the valve is shown in Table 1. This evaluation was made from examination of the entire outer surface of smaller valves of each species. Those species with patterns ex- hibited on less than 50% of the mosaicostracum show other structures which are helpful in species identification but do not fit into any recognizable systematic relation at the present time. Future studies may prove these struc- tures to be of greater use. THEORY or THE ORIGIN oF THE MOSAICOSTRACUM The scheme for the formation of the mineralized com- ponents in the invertebrates, especially those having car- bonate hard parts, is not fully understood and no known system of reactions can express even the simplest of Explanation of Plate 30 Plan Views from Pt/C Single Stage Replicas of the Surface of the Mosaicostracum. % 15 000 Figure 9: Tellina (Merisca) martinicensis D’ORBIGNY, 1842 USNM No. 42897 Figure 10: Téllina (Eurytellina) angulosa GMELIN, 1791 USNM No. 33740 structures that occur. There is a general consensus that 2 phases are present in the formation of the mineral com- ponents of the skeletal material: the mineral or inorganic phase and the organic phase. The mineral phase, which in the Tellinidae can be restricted to CaCOs, is formed in conjunction with various responses of the organism either to a time sequenced mechanism such as circadian cell activity or cell sequences of some shorter period, or to changing conditions of the environment not only of the immediate area of the zone of mineralization but also to an interaction of the organism with the gross environment (Orton, 1928). There is the possibility that the metabolism of the bivalve reflects the catabolism and assimilation of food with a correlation in shell struc- tures (Fox & Cor, 1943). The rate of growth of the valve has been shown to be related to salinity and temperature (MatoneE & Dopp, 1967). Probably the most significant influence on the type of CaCO; formed is the presence of organic material (KiTANo & Hoop, 1965). It is on this last point that the theory of the origin of the mosa- icostracum is based. The role of the mantle tissue in the secretion of the various layers of the shell has been investigated and the secretion of the periostracum by the inner epithelium of the outer mantle lobe has been confirmed (BEEDHAM, 1958; BEVELANDER & NAKAHARA, 1967). The formation of the mosaicostracum occurs after secretion of the peri- ostracum and prior to secretion of the ectostracum and is related to calcification either on or in an organic sub- strate forming the innermost surface of the periostracum and the outermost surface of the ectostracum. The com- position of this organic substrate is not known but it is within the bounds of the present theory that it is some combination of protein and carbohydrate. If the protein is recognized as being the active compound and the car- bohydrate as the passive compound a reasonable relation between the two in terms of their role in the formation of shell material can be visualized. The source of both compounds is the mantle. Within each mantle cell there is the necessary machinery to synthesize proteins and their synthesis is dependent on the proper stimulus from the Explanation of Plate 31 Plan Views from Pt/C Single Stage Replicas of the Surface of the Mosaicostracum. X 15000 Figure 11: Tellina (Eurytellina) alternata (Say, 1822) USNM No. 40536 Figure 12: Tellina (Eurytellina) punicea Born, 1778 USNM No. 122226 Tue VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 3 [HamiLton] Plate 30 Tue VELIcER, Vol. 11, No. 3 [HamiLTon] Plate 31 Figure 12 Vol. 11; No. 3 THE VELIGER Page 189 cell nucleus by the DNA. The synthesis of proteins is not completely understood, so only a brief outline will be given on which to base a particular aspect of the theory. The cytoplasm of the cells making up the mantle-epi- thelia contains ribosomes which are a combination of RNA and protein. These ribosomes are utilized in the synthesis of proteins when they react to messenger RNA which is patterned after the DNA. When the proper or specific information is transferred from the DNA by the RNA to the ribosome, individual amino acids are assim- ilated in some sequence to form a chain-like structure or protein. The protein separates from the ribosome and assumes some role in the organism. It is important to bear in mind that the DNA contains the genetic information. Although many types of protein are produced in the cell, some of these (if not just one) are instrumental in the calcification process in the shell and have certain genetic properties reflected in their structure. We could consider these properties as being the smallest unit of species indication where species are based on the shell character- istics. The protein is then secreted from the mantle and arrives at the shell surface or, as is the case with the mosaicostracum, at the surface of the periostracum distal of the periostracal groove and immediately adjacent to the ectostracum (Plate 38, Figure 31). This transport of protein implies that the mantle is in intimate contact with the shell and the periostracum or that there is some mechanism that drives the proteins across the extrapallial fluid. It is most likely a combination of both, depending on when the secretion occurs. There is a detectable differ- ence in electric potential across the mantle so the mechanism could be electrophoretic (Wi1pur, 1964). The passive or carbohydrate compounds which may have a role in the process of calcification are derived from mucus cells adjacent to the mantle epithelial cells. They are found to be abundant outside the pallial line and particularly in the outer mantle fold and secrete a mucus-like compound best described as a mucoprotein or neutral polysaccharide (BEEDHAM, 1958). This mucus may play an active role in the transport of calcium or calcium salts and is necessary for lubrication of the mantle-shell interface. Essentially an environment con- ducive to shell formation is created by the mantle in the zone between the outer lobe and the periostracum. What the source and transport mechanism of the calcium is and how it enters into a reaction with the organic phase is a subject of great speculation in current research. The shell material is forming and this aspect can be inter- preted on the basis of the interaction of the specific amino acids making up the shell protein, accepting the presence of the carbohydrate, and examining the patterns of calcification. It has been demonstrated that some pro- teins can give evidence as to their stage of evolution by the number and sequence of amino acids in the peptide chain (AcHER, 1966). It has been proposed that there are active and passive sites in the protein-carbohydrate complex and that these active sites coincide with or are more prone to formation of the mineral components that form the shell. Theoretically these active sites are a speci- fic amino acid or amino acid combination such as aspar- tic acid or glutamic acid or both (PE. Hare, personal communication). Their position on the protein molecule responsible for the calcifying process is determined by the genetic nature at the species level of the material forming the patterns observed on the outer surface of the shell or the mosaicostracum. The difference in size between the structures seen on the mosaicostracum and the individual protein fibers which contribute to the formation of the patterns is on the order of many hundred times. The protein fibers or- ganize into a three-dimensional network before calcifi- cation begins in a configuration governed by the chemistry Table 1 Estimated Percent Distribution of Mosaicostracum Showing Distinctive Pattern Tellina (Tellina) radiata 95% Tellina (Moerella) salmonea 95% Tellina (Laciolina) laevigata 50% Tellina (Laciolina) magna 25% Tellina (Phyllodina) squamifera 25% Tellina (Phyllodina) persica 25% Tellina (Merisca) cristallina 95% Tellina (Merisca) aequistriata 50% Tellina (Merisca) martinicensis 25% Tellina (Eurytellina) angulosa 75% Tellina (Eurytellina) alternata 75% Tellina (Eurytellina) punicca 95% Tellina (Arcopagia) fausta 25% Tellina (Acorylus) gouldu 75% Tellina (Scissula) similis 95% Tellina (Scissula) iris 95% Tellina (Angulus) versicolor 95% Tellina (Angulus) carpenteri 75% Tellina (Tellinella) listeri 50% Tellina (Tellinella) virgata 25% of the protein-polysaccharide mix. Again, this network symmetry is determined by the genetic nature of the calcifying proteins and polysaccharides. ‘There are prob- ably networks which are common to many genera and families of bivalves but the specific characteristics are seen only in the subunit distribution which forms the Page 190 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 overall pattern. These subunits are generated at the pre- viously mentioned specific sites on the protein molecule. The remanent of such a calcifying network is illustrated (Plate 38, Figure 34). DISCUSSION The previous sections have given evidence for the presence of a structure unique to each species of the Tellinidae studied by a technique with the electron microscopee. These structures form patterns which are believed to be controlled by the genetic nature of the calcifying sub- strate of organic material. Furthermore, evidence has shown that the mosaicostracum is preserved in fossil ma- terial. One specimen of Tellina (Arcopagia) gabbi Garp- NER, 1916, from the Upper Cretaceous, Monmouth for- mation, Brightseat, Prince Georges County, Maryland, and one specimen of Tellina sp. from the Upper Creta- ceous, Ripley formation, Quitman County, Georgia were examined. Both specimens showed a well preserved mo- saicostracum. This is the result of a durable layer of the periostracum covering the mosaicostracum. The necessary elements for a phylogenetic study of the mosaicostracum have been proposed concurrent with the theory that the portion of the periostracum covering the mosaicostracum will prevent diagenesis to a degree that overall morpho- logy of the patterns will not be altered in the geological record. ‘Tests on fossil bivalves through time and space where differences in environment of local diagenesis could be detected as well as variation in time of the structure of the patterns is the next step in confirming the time sequenced substitution of different amino acids acting to produce new and hopefully related patterns on the mosa- icostracum. Such studies may not only elucidate the phy- logeny of calcified tissues but also the type of calcification that can be considered as being primitive and advanced. Explanation of Plate 32 Plan Views from Pt/C Single Stage Replicas of the Surface of the Mosaicostracum. * 15 000 Figure 13: Tellina (Arcopagia) fausta PULTENEY, 1799 USNM No. 461708 Figure 14: Tellina (Acorylus) gouldii HANLEY, 1846 USNM No. 383373 Explanation of Plate 33 Plan Views from Pt/C Single Stage Replicas of the Surface of the Mosaicostracum. 15.000 Figure 15: Tellina (Scissula) similis SowERBY, 1806 No Number Figure 16: Tellina (Scissula) iris Say, 1822 USNM No. 193052 If these studies are made in conjunction with amino acid analyses of the shell proteins, new evidence may be gained to show more precisely the interrelationships of species, genera, families, etc., of bivalves. In the event these studies show that the mosaicostracum is subject to some degree of alteration in the geologic record, the usefulness of the techniques may be lost for the pale- ontologist but it will still give the neontologist a new tool to study the bivalves. At the outset an extensive study of modern bivalves may be more in order before going to the fossil record so that possible revisions of related species and genera may be confirmed or revised. Moreover, the phylogeny of modern bivalves may be better understood when the interrelationship of calcified patterns and gen- etically controlled organic calcifying substrates is fully understood. A more qualified inference of the space relationships of the same species of Tellinidae is facilitated by recog- nizing geographic sites for the collection of specimens that best exhibit the designated pattern for the species. The patterns illustrated were selected from specimens which display the essential characteristics of the species based on the categorical system proposed in the previous sec- tion. The USNM collection numbers for the illustrated species are to be regarded as designating the locality where specimens of the species can be found which best show the pattern. This is intended to designate a type locality and population and not to designate a type specimen. PHYLOGENETIC IMPLICATIONS oF THE PATTERNS At the outset it was hoped that the patterns seen on each different species would be so distinct that possible taxo- nomic confusion resulting from a similarity between the Explanation of Plate 34 Plan Views from Pt/C Single Stage Replicas of the Surface of the Mosaicostracum. > 15 000 Figure 17: Tellina (Angulus) versicolor (CozzENs MS) DeKay USNM No. 462008 Figure 18: Tellina (Angulus) carpenteri DALL, 1900 USNM No. 219470 Explanation of Plate 35 Plan Views from Pt/C Single Stage Replicas of the Surface of the Mosaicostracum. X 15000 Figure 19: Tellina (Tellinella) listeri Rovinc, 1798 USNM No. 530399 Figure 20: Tellina (Teéllinella) virgata LINNAEUS, 1758 USNM No. 17632 THE VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 3 [HamiLTon] Plate 32 SESE TY es KG SSS SI Figure 14 [HamiLTon] Plate 33 THE VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 3 x , je * re ee, “ -— $ Cr Ee <9 ya age? \y oe > A 4 , es ' & ’ a y “ aS, 3 (1 “ s +e Pa} ‘ 5 ‘ « om bet 4 : a ives) © = bs L onl — f © 2 o vere! 5 i} 80 te) ’ 4 ‘ 2] Na he \ . PTR § y Ve “S " PADS | * A p ~~ 4 2 . ‘ ® « “~~ 4 a a i : AAS ‘ ~ Wwe . ‘ ui ~ ; mm. x ‘El § a’ \ ’ « a AL oe. er , - ‘adh . x 5 < a ? 4 fs > 7, A . I » M, ” a 4 a. ~ . > eg ; le os Soe CS & ®. mae 2 = Oi Fema lr 2 ae pa r,s ak > Oh % ge: Pr "1 . Magish rk ae ~ ) me, ee \ Pee ~ oe . : Po nM "Rial ali tw ON +» 9 * & THE VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 3 [HamiLTon] Plate 34 tS ae Sw Fe 4 ro - wm < r ~ ‘ 5 » . - . oo Jae ° ~ ~ . = < t 7 - \« . fe s a. ty , THE VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 3 [HamiLton] Plate 35 Vol. 11; No. 3 THE VELIGER Page 191 patterns would be avoided. The study demonstrated, however, that closely related, but not precisely similar patterns characterized many species. In some cases, spe- cies with very similar patterns represented the subgenera defined on macromorphological grounds. In a few cases species of different subgenera had similar patterns. These features and the apparent developmental sequence of patterns imply that the patterns are related phylogene- tically. The pattern groups were erected without a conscious pre-existing scheme in mind and only after attempts to establish the phylogenetic relationships of the patterns did it seem plausible to propose how the patterns are related and what the implications of such an arrangement might be. Some of the pattern similarities agree with Boss’s (1966) divisions at the subgeneric level and some are distinct to such a degree that it would be a simple matter to regroup the species into different existing sub- genera or to identify closely related subgenera. The cri- terion of any phylogeny is the progression from similar characteristic to similar characteristic until the two dis- tinct end members are separated by a progression of interrelated features. The degree of complexity exhibited by the mosaicostracum patterns serves as another basis for evaluating phylogenetic relationships within the Tel- linidae. The basis of this phylogenetic scheme will be the degree of complexity that the patterns display. The de- gree of pattern complexity is divided into 3 major divi- sions: the simple group, the compound group, and the complex group. The schematic representation is shown in Table 2. The simple pattern groups which are comprised of the mosaic, pustulose, crystalline, linear, and planar patterns will represent the basic pattern groups upon which to erect a hierarchy. These 5 groups are divided into 3 sets. (A), which is the mosaic sct, contains the species Tellina alternata T. angulosa, T: punicea, T. carpenter, and T: magna. (B), which is the crystalline and pustulose set, contains the species T: cristallina, T: martinicensis, T. iris, T: persica, T. aequistriata, and T: similis. (C), which is the planar and lincar sct, contains the species T- listeri and T: virgata. (A) subset, which is the compound group pustulose-mosaic, contains the species T: radiata and T. versicolor. (B) subset, which is the compound group crystalline-pustulose, contains the species T: salmonea. (C) subset, which is the compound group crystalline- linear, contains the species T: squamifera and T. gouldit. (D), the last subset, is the complex group crystalline- linear — crystalline-pustulose — pustulose-lincar, contains one species, T: laevigata. Table 2 COMPOUND SIMPLE COMPLEX Laciolina Eurytellina A Set Eurytellina B Eurytellina & A Subset angela Angulus Tellina Merisca D Subset Scissula Pustulose Moerella Scissula Merisca Merisca Phyllodina Laciolina C Subset Crystalline Pustulose-Linear Phyllodina Acorylus Tellinella Crystalline-Linear |Crystalline-Pustulose | Pustulose- Mosaic C Set Tellinclla Arcopagia Starting with set (A) it may be concluded that Tellina (Laciolina) magna, T: (Eurytellina) angulosa, T. (E.) alternata, T. (E.) punicea, and T. (Angulus) carpenteri are Closely related. Tellina (Angulus) versicolor represents the transition species at the subgeneric level from the simple mosaic group to the compound pustulose-mosaic group and is also closely related to T: (Tellina) radiata. In set (B), 7: (Merisca) acquistriata and T. (Scissula) similis are closely related as are T. (S.) iris, T. (Merisca) martinicensis, T. (Af.) cristallina and T. (Phyllodina) per- sica. These species have no transition species at the sub- gencric level to subset (B), which is represented by T.: (Moercella) salmonea. Note that T: salmonea is a Pacific species. This could imply that some other unstudied spe- cies in the subgenus Moerella may have a transition pat- tern or that no transition pattern exists at the subgeneric level. Tellina (Phyllodina) persica is the transition species Page 192 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 to subset (C) and is related to T: (P.) squamifera, which is closely related to T: (Acorylus) gouldii. In set (C) T. (Tellinella) listert is not as closely related to T. (T.) vir- gata and T. (Arcopagia) gouldii as it is to the species in subset (C). In set (C) there is no transition pattern at the subgeneric level and only an allusion of the rclation- ship to subset (C) is seen with the linear pattern on T: (Tellinella) listeri. The species T: fausta and T. virgata seem to be more isolated than any of the other species in the simple pattern group. This could imply that the planar pattern is the most primitive in terms of its posi- tion in the phylogenetic hierarchy. The compound group contains 5 species, each of which may be related at the subgeneric level to 2 common ancestors: Tellina (Phyllodina) squamifera and T. (Angu- lus) versicolor. Subset (D), which contains one species, Tellina (Lacio- lina) laevigata, is the end member of the hierarchy. It probably represents the most advanced species of the 20 studied. Boss (1966) remarks that Laciolina represent- atives have not been discovered in the fossil record of the Western Atlantic. It is noteworthy that most of the other subgenera studied do have fossil representatives. The overall validity of the phylogeny can be justified by the number of species that share the same pattern. At the subgeneric level there are 3 species in Eurytellina confined to set (A), 3 species in Merisca and 2 in Scissula confined to set (B), and 2 species in Tellinella confined to set (C). The departure from this degree of similarity is better born out by the interrelationships of the patterns in the subsets. The fact that simple patterns are combined with each other to form the compound patterns, and that the com- pound patterns are combined to form the complex pat- terns leads to the question as to how this sequence of combinations can be used to determine the phylogenetic relationship of the species and subgenera. Three assump- tions can be made: (1) that the simple patterns are primary and the complex advanced phylogenetically and therefore the complex pattern represents a recombina- Explanation of Plate 36 Figure 21: Oblique view, single stage Pt/C stage replica from contact of mosaicostracum with ectostracum fractured edge. Note mosaicostracum overhanging at middle and far right. Tellina (Eu- rytellina) angulosa. X 15000 Figure 22: Oblique view, single stage Pt/C replica of concentric growth ridge showing continuity of mosaicostracum over ridge and two areas where the ridge is fractured revealing the underlying ectostracum and the mosaicostracum overhanging at the lower left and upper right. Tellina (Eurytellina) alternata. % 5000 Figure 23: Oblique view, single stage Pt/C replica from contact of mosaicostracum with ectostracum at fractured edge. Note angular break of mosaicostracum lacking an overhang as in Figures 21, 22, and 24. Tellina (Scissula) similis. 15.000 Figure 24: Oblique view, single stage Pt/C replica from contact of mosaicostracum with ectostracum fractured edge. Note mosaicost- racum overhanging the contact. Tellina (Eurytellina) alternata. X 15 000 Explanation of Plate 37 Explanation of Plate 38 Figures 25, 26, 27: Ontogenetic series with range in shell size by Figure 31: Diagrammatic sketch to illustrate a typical mantle-shell length 9mm, 13mm, 21 mm. Plan view, single stage Pt/C replica of mosaicostracum. Tellina (Merisca) aequistriata. USNM No. 40737. % 5000 Figure 28: Plan view, single stage Pt/C replica of mosaicostracum from Tellina (Merisca) aequistriata. USNM No. 194658. XX 5 000 Figure 29: Plan view, single stage Pt/C replica of mosaicostracum from Tellina (Merisca) aequistriata. USNM No. 461671. *X 5 000 Figure 30: Plan view, single stage Pt/C replica of mosaicostracum from Tellina (Merisca) aequistriata. USNM No. 46309. XX 5 000 ? relationship and probable area (A) where the mosaicostracum is first formed. Not to scale. After BerpHamM, 1958. Figures 32 and 33: Plan view, single stage Pt/C replica of con- centric growth ridge (GR) with mosaicostracum to either side of ridge and absent, probably due to abrasion, on top of ridge. Note organic material clinging to replica in Figure 33 along lower left edge of ridge. XX 5000 Figure 34: Plan view, sing’e stage Pt/C replica of reticulated fibrous matrix which may be a bleach-insoluble calcifying network between the major portion of the periostracum and the mosaicost- racum. Observed on all species with same general appearance. Tellina (Tellina) radiata. | 15000 THE VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 3 [HamiLTon] Plate 36 EEE, 4 Tree Sh J oe ; a Fe “ a. “EN ae SS Figure 23 Figure 24 THE VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 3 [HamiLTon] Plate 37 Figure 27 Figure 30 THE VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 3 periostracal : roove periostracum s 7, as Je AC WM “a 44 ee we) poral mucous cells epithelium of outer fold Figure 31 Fi igure 33 [HamILTon] Plate 38 Vol. 11; No. 3 THE VELIGER Page 193 Table 3 Number in Specimens Growth Series Examined USNM Left Right Left Right Subgenus and Species Number Locality Valve Valve Tellina (Tellina) radiata Linnazus, 1758 598232 Varadero Beach, Cuba 3 2 4 15 (Tellina) radiata LinnagEus, 1758 621563 Bermuda 1 (Tellina) radiata Linnagus, 1758 589833 Bimini, Bahamas 6 (Tellina) radiata Linnarus, 1758 360265 San Salvador 2 1 (Tellina) radiata Linnagus, 1758 27175 Cedar Keys, Florida 1 3 (Tellina) radiata Linnarus, 1758 440497 Haiti 2 1 (Tellina) radiata Linnazus, 1758 161443 Miami, Florida 2 1 (Tellina) radiata Linnarus, 1758 122222 La Guayra, Venezuela 2 1 (Tellina) radiata Linnazus, 1758 168854 Sanibel Island, Florida 2 1 (Moerella) salmonea (CARPENTER, 1864) 108634 Kiska Island, Alaska 2 (Moerella) salmonea (CarPENTER, 1864) 108649 Saint Paul, Alaska 3 (Moerella) salmonea (CARPENTER, 1864) 13688 Monterey, California 1 2 (Laciolina) laevigata Linnarus, 1758 83354 Bermuda 1 2 (Laciolina) magna SPENGLER, 1798 36174 Tampa Bay, Florida 1 (Laciolina) magna SPENGLER, 1798 57151 East Coast, Florida 1 (Laciolina) magna SpENGLER, 1798 426098 Cuba 1 (Laciolina) magna SpencuiER, 1798 621627 Bermuda 1 (Phyllodina) squamifera Desuayes, 1855 461776 Miami, Florida 2 1 (Phyllodina) persica Day « Simpson, 1901 161780 Puerto Rico 2 1 (Merisca) cristallina SPENGLER, 1798 530395 Saint Thomas, Virgin Islands 1 2 (Merisca) aequistriata Say, 1824 461671 Santa Lucia, Cuba 3 (Merisca) aequistriata Say, 1824 465309 Cape Hatteras, N. C. 1 (Merisca) aequistriata Say, 1824 194658 West Coast of Florida 4 1 (Merisca) martinicensis p’'OrBicNy, 1842 42897 Saint Dominique 2 1 (Eurytellina) angulosa Gmeuin, 1791 33740 Saint Croix 1 (Eurytellina) alternata Say, 1822 40536 Cape Hatteras, N.C. 3 4 (Eurytellina) alternata Say, 1822 35836 Cape Hatteras, N.C. 3 3 (Eurytellina) alternata Say, 1822 36173 Charleston Bay, S.C. 2 4 (Eurytellina) alternata Say, 1822 461622 Texas 1 1 (Eurytellina) alternata Say, 1822 36608 Beaufort, N.C. 1 1 (Eurytellina) alternata Say, 1822 464192 West Florida 1 1 (Eurytellina) alternata Say, 1822 46866 Florida 2 1 (Eurytellina) punicea Born, 1778 122226 La Guayra, Venezuela 3 (Arcopagia) fausta PuLTENEY, 1799 461708 Cabanas Bay, Cuba 1 2 (Arcopagia) fausta PuLTENEY, 1799 56583 Vera Cruz, Mexico 2 1 (Arcopagia) fausta PuLTENEY, 1799 53639 Key West, Florida 2 3 (Arcopagia) fausta PuLTENEY, 1799 461709 Kings, Jamaica 1 2 (Acorylus) gouldii HANLEy, 1846 500913 Barbados 3 1 (Acorylus) gouldii HANiEy, 1846 383373 Jeremie, Haiti 1 (Scissula) similis Sowersy, 1806 no No. Florida 3 (Scissula) iris Say, 1822 429015 Cape Hatteras Pt., N. C. 2 (Scissula) iris Say, 1822 193052 Cameron, Louisana 1 (Scissula) iris Say, 1822 426111 Saint Augustine, Florida 2 1 (Scissula) iris Say, 1822 128435 South Carolina 1 4 (Scissula) iris Say, 1822 461670 Bimini, Bahamas 1 1 (Angulus) versicolor (CozzEns MS) DeKay 40566 Cape Hatteras, N. C. 5 3 (Angulus) versicolor (GozzENs MS) DeKay 462123 Key West, Florida 3 2 (Angulus) versicolor (CozzEns MS) DreKay 462098 Santa Lucia, Cuba 3 2 (Angulus) carpenteri Dati, 1900 219470 Chirikoff Island, Alaska 2 1 (Tellinella) listeri ROpinc, 1798 461634 Miami, Florida 1 (Tellinella) listeri Rovinc, 1798 27238 Tortugas, Florida 1 1 (Tellinella) listeri ROpinc, 1798 426079 Havana, Cuba 1 (Tellinella) listeri ROpinc, 1798 83334 Bermuda 2 1 (Tellinella) listert Ropinc, 1798 441522 Montego Bay, Jamaica 1 (Tellinella) listeri Ropinc, 1798 393926 El Rogue Island, Venezuela 1 (Tellinella) listeri ROpinc, 1798 426323 Haiti 1 1 (Tellinella) listeri Rovinc, 1798 530399 Saint Thomas, Virgin Islands 6 4 po (Tellinella) virgata LinnaEus, 1758 17632 Singapore, China 2 Page 194 TimEMVIELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 tion of genetic material from simple stocks; (2) that the compound groups represent links between simple pattern groups in which only one pattern mutated and introduced a new pattern; (3) that the complex and compound lineages are ancestral to simple lineages which represent ‘genetic isolation of the simple pattern groups contained in the complex group. SUMMARY A newly discovered calcareous shell layer, the mosaicost- racum, forms a veneer between the ectostracum and peri- ostracum of bivalve shells and externally displays distinct surface patterns when examined with the electron micro- scope at magnifications of 2500 & and greater. These patterns appear to be taxonomically consistent at the species level and can generally be arranged in morpho- groups, some of which are compatible with existing sub- generic categories. The family Tellinidae was chosen to test the constancy of the patterns at the generic, subgeneric and species levels under 5 parameters relevant to each tested species: 1. variation in the adult population; 2. variation between the right and left valves; 3. ontogenetic variation; 4. ge- ographic variation; 5. variation over the area of a single valve with tests to compare the patterns between pig- mented zones and unpigmented zones. Representative species for each subgenus of the Tellinidae (Boss, 1966) of the Western Atlantic and a few from the Pacific were tested. Two fossil Tellins were examined from the Late Cretaceous of Georgia and Maryland. The species examined consistently displayed the same patterns regardless of the tested parameters and could be identified, on shell fragments alone, by this method. Pat- terns of species within a single subgenus are sometimes closely related, and the general patterns of genera and subgenera are distinct to varying degrees, suggesting that the ultrastructure of the mosaicostracum is a potential tool for specific identification, and for the study of phylo- geny and evolution in living and fossil bivalves. The prob- able origin of this layer is discussed. LITERATURE CITED AcuHer, R. 1966. Evolutionary aspects of the structure of proteins. Angewandte Chemie 5 (9): 798 - 806 BEEDHAM, G. E. 1958. Observations on the mantle of the Lamellibranchia. Quart. Journ. Micro. Sci. 99 (2), 3° ser., no. 46: 181 - 197; plts. 1, 2 BEvELANDER, G. « H. NAKAHARA 1967. An electron microscope study of the periostracum of Macrocallista maculata. Calcified Tissue Res. 1 (1): 55 to 67; 6 figs. Boccixp, G. B. 1930. The shell structure of the mollusks. D. Kg. Danske Vidensk. Selsk. Skr., Naturv. Math. Afd., 9 R II 2: 231 - 325; 10 figs.; plts. 1-15 Boss, KENNETH JAY 1966. The subfamily Tellininae in the western Atlantic. The genus Tellina (part 1). Johnsonia 4 (45): 217 - 272; plts. 127 - 142 CarPENTER, W. 1848. | On the microscopic structure of shells. meeting Brit. Assoc. Adv. Sci., pp. 1 - 24; 20 plts. Reprt. 147 Fox, Dennis LLEWELLYN & WESLEY ROSWELL COE 1943. Biology of the California sea mussel Mytilus californi- anus. Journ. Exper. Zool. 93 (2): 205 - 249 GuNTER, GORDON 1950. The generic status of living oysters and the scientific name of the common American species. Amer. Midl. Nat. 43 (2): 438 - 449 Kirano, Y. & D. W. Hoop 1965. The influence of organic material on the polymorphic crystallization of calcium carbonate. Geochim. et Cosmo- chim. 29: 29 - 41 Matong, P.G. « J. R. Dopp 1967. ‘Temperature and salinity effects on calcification rate in Mytilus edulis and its paleoecological implications. Lim- nol. & Oceanogr. 12 (3): 432 - 436 NeweE Lt, N. D. 1965. Classification of the Bivalvia. 2206; 3 figs.; 1 tab. OBERLING, J. J. Amer. Mus. Novit. 1955. Shell structure of West American Pelecypoda. Wash. Acad. Sci. 45 (4): 128 - 130 1964. | Observations on some structural features of the pelecy- pod shell. Mitteil. Naturforsch. Gesellsch. Bern, new ser., 20: 1 - 63; 6 plts.; 59 figs. Orton, Joun H. Journ. 1928. On rhythmic periods in shell-growth in Ostrea edulis with a note on flattening. Journ. Marine Biol. Assoc. U. K. 15 (2): 365 - 427 Towe, K. M. « R. CIreLur 1967. Wall ultrastructure in the calcareous Foraminifera: crystallographic aspects and a model for calcification. | Journ. Paleont. 41 (3): 742 - 762; plts. 87 - 99 Wivzur, K. M. 1964. Shell formation and regeneration In K.M. WILBUR « C.M.Yonce (eds.) Physiology of Mollusca; Academic Press, New York, N. Y., 1: 243 - 282 YoncE, CHARLES MAurRICE 1949. On the structure and adaptations of the Tellinacea, deposit-feeding Eulamellibranchia. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, ser. B, Biol. Sci. 234 (609): 29-76 Wolyplli-sINow3 THE VELIGER Page 195 A New Species of Strombina from the Galapagos Islands BY WILLIAM K. EMERSON AND ANTHONY D’ATTILIO Department of Living Invertebrates, American Museum of Natural History Seventy-ninth Street and Central Park West, New York, New York 10024 (Plate 39) AMONG SEVERAL NEW or otherwise interesting mollusks received from Mrs. Jacqueline DeRoy of Academy Bay, Santa Cruz Island, The Galapagos Islands, are two spe- cimens of an apparently new species of Strombina. We take pleasure in describing this species in honor of Mrs. DeRoy. Strombina (Cotonopsis) deroyae EMERSON & D’ATTILIO, spec. nov. Diagnosis: This species may be distinguished from Strombina (Cotonopsis) esmeraldensis Otsson, 1964, a precursor in the Ecuadorian Neogene, by having a much larger shell (attaining nearly twice the length of the fossil), with a less robust outline, a proportionately larger and more strongly recurved siphonal canal, and with finer spiral threads on the base of the body whorl. Description: The shell is thin though large for the genus, surface smooth, except for first 4 post-nepionic whorls; spire extended; body whorl swollen, ending in a long recurved canal. The holotype is a well-preserved, but dead-collected specimen, lacking soft parts. The shell has 10 whorls, the nepionic whorls having been lost. The individual whorls of the spire are slightly convex; the suture is well-defined but simple; each of the 4 whorls of the spire are sculptured with about 11 axial ribs which extend the length of each whorl to give the suture a slight undulation; the ribs are about equal in size to the interspaces and gradually become obsolete on the fifth whorl. A few widely spaced spiral striae are present on the body whorl above the aperture; the lower half of the body whorl is sculptured with numerous, closely set, rounded, spiral striae that continue in the same manner to the base of the siphonal canal. The length of the aperture and canal is about one half the height of the shell; the aperture is narrowly elliptical; the inner lip sinuously turns into the canal; the parietal region is poorly defined except below, along the siphonal canal; anteriorly a strong cord arises from within, on the inner lip, and curves around to join the labial edge to form an anal canal; in addition, the labrum is thickened ante- riorly within by a large rounded knob-like plica furthering the formation of the anal canal; above this knob there are 2 smaller plicae. The lip edge is thickened into an axial cord above and diminishes below into a thin edge along the siphonal canal; within the labrum there are present below the knob forming the anal canal 12 to 14 lirations extending within the aperture for a short dis- tance; the lirations are weakest anteriorly. The strongly recurved siphonal canal is widely open. The opercular and radular characters are not known, as the holotype and paratype were both empty shells when dredged. The color on the dorsum of the shell consists of a medium shade of brown broken up into a pattern ar- ranged in axial, lightning-like streaks and daubs of brown over white in a broad band on the spire; the lighter area is directly below the suture; on the body whorl an addi- tional lighter band is found starting anteriorly near the anal canal and divides the pattern on the body whorl more or less into 2 more lightly and 2 more heavily maculated areas. Measurements: Holotype, 49mm in length (early whorls missing), 26.7 mm in width (Plate 39, Figures 1 Page 196 to 3). Paratype, 46 mm in length (early whorls missing), 25.4 mm in width (Plate 39, Figures 4 to 7). Type Locality: Southeast of Academy Bay, Santa Cruz Island, dredged in 102 fathoms, April 26, 1967, by the DeRoys. Type Repositories: Holotype, American Museum of Natural History no. 146277; paratype, collection of Mrs. DeRoy. Remarks: Except for the recently re-discovered Carib- bean species, Strombina pumilio (REEVE, 1859) (WEIs- BORD, 1962; Wooprinc, 1964), representatives of this New World genus are now confined to the warm waters of the eastern Pacific Ocean. We here add an additional species to the approximately 24 known from the Panamic faunal province (see KEEN, 1958, for a list of the living species). The genus flourished in the tropical western Atlantic and eastern Pacific during early to late Miocene time, ranging from the southeastern United States, the West Indies, to Venezuela, and from Costa Rica to Ecuador. In the Pliocene, its distribution became more limited, with species known only from Florida, Trinidad, Venezuela, Ecuador, and westem Panama. With the closure of the trans-American seaways in the late Terti- ary, only the above mentioned species is known to have survived in the western Atlantic. WrIsBorp (1962, pp. 323 - 329) lists about 50 nominal species of Strombina reported as fossils from deposits ranging in age from early Miocene to late Pliocene. Of this number, only 4 of the records refer to living species. The new species appears to represent a living repre- sentative of a small group of the genus that lacks a strombinoid hump on the body whorl. This group was afforded subgeneric recognition by Orsson (1942, p. 227), who proposed the name Cotonopsis, with Strombina (C.) panacostaricensis OLsson (1942, pp. 227, 228; plt. 23, fig. 5) the type of the subgenus. The type species is a fossil from the Pliocene Charco Azul formation of the Panamanian Burica Peninsula. According to Oxsson (1942, p. 227), a second, unnamed species of this group also occurs in these deposits. A third species, S. (C.) esmeraldensis OLsson (1964, p. 148; plt. 28, figs. 3, 3a), which more closely resembles the present species, occurs in the Mio-Pliocene Esmeraldas formation at Quebrada Camarones, Ecuador. The Ecuadorian fossil is much THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 smaller than the new species, being only 25.9mm in length, and it possesses a stouter appearance. Of the known living species of Strombina (sensu lato) that lack a strombinoid hump, the shell of the new Gala- pagan species is reminiscent of Strombina (?Cotonopsis) edentula Dat, 1908, but the resemblance may be solely superficial. DaL’s holotype, which has not been illus- trated, has a shorter (34 mm in length) and stouter shell with a proportionately shorter and less recurved siphonal canal (teste A. A. Olsson, in litteris). DaLu’s type has each of the first 4 post-nepionic whorls ornamented with 14 to 15 axial ribs, whereas the new species has about 11 ribs on each of these whorls. Strombina turrita (SowER- By, 1832), which is a living ally of S. edentula, also lacks denticulations or lirations of any sort on the inside of the outer lip. SowErBy’s taxon has a much smaller, more slender shell than that of the new species; and unlike the new species and S. edentula, it lacks axial ribs on the early whorls. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS In addition to Mrs. DeRoy, we are indebted to Dr. George E. Radwin of the San Diego Museum of Natural History, Mr. Axel A. Olsson of Coral Gables, Florida, Dr. James H. McLean of the Los Angeles Museum of Natural History, Dr. Leo George Hertlein of the California Aca- demy of Sciences, Dr. Joseph Rosewater of the U.S. National Museum, and Mr. William E. Old, Jr. of the American Museum of Natural History, for various cour- tesies. Mr. Olsson and Dr. Radwin kindly read a draft of the manuscript. LITERATURE CITED Dari, WitutiAM HEaALey 1908. Reports on the dredging operations off the west coast of Central America to the Galapagos, to the west coast of Mexico, and in the Gulf of California. . XIV. The Mollusca and Brachiopoda. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., Harvard 43 (6): 205-487; 22 plts. KEEN, A. Myra 1958. Sea shells of tropical West America; marine mollusks from Lower California to Colombia. i- xi + 624 pp.; illus. Stanford, Calif. (Stanford Univ. Press) Explanation of Plate 39 Strombina (Cotonopsis) deroyae EMERSON & D’ArTILio, spec. nov. Figures 1 to 3: Holotype, A.M.N.H. no. 146277; Figures 1-2: X1.5; Figure 3: early whorls greatly enlarged to show axial ribs Figures 4 to 7: Paratype, DeRoy Collection; 1.5 TuHE VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 3 [EMERSON & D’ArTILI0] Plate 39 Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 7 Vol. 11; No. 3 THE VELIGER Oxsson, AXEL A. 1942. ‘Tertiary and Quaternary fossils from the Burica Penin- sula of Panama and Costa Rica. Bull. Amer. Paleo. 27 (106) : 153 - 258; plts. 14 - 25 1964. | Neogene mollusks from northwestern Ecuador. Ithaca, New York (Paleo. Res. Inst.) pp. 1 - 256; plts. 1 - 38 (28 Oct.) REEvE, LovELL Aucustus 1859, | Monograph of the genus Columbella. In Conchologia Iconica, London, vol. 2; 37 plts. and text. SoweErsBy, GEorcE BRETTINGHAM (1ST of name) 1832. | Characters of new species of Mollusca and Conchifera collected by Mr. Cuming. Proc. Zool. Soc. London for 1832, pt. 2 (19): 113 - 120 (14 August 1832) WEIsBorD, NorRMAN EDWARD 1962. Late Cenozoic gastropods from Northern Venezuela. Bull. Amer. Paleo. 42 (193): 1-672; plts. 1-48 (5 March 1962) Wooprinc, WENDELL PHILLIPS 1964. Geology and paleontology of Canal Zone and adjoining parts of Panama. U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper 306-C: 238 - 297; plts. 39-47 Page 197 Page 198 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 A Note on Feeding and Excretion in Bivalves BY P DINAMANI Department of Marine Biology, University of Kerala RECENT stTupIEs on the faecal pellets of bivalve molluscs (Kornicker, 1962; ARAKAwA, 1963, 1965) and on their rectum (JEGLA & GREENBERG, 1968) have drawn atten- tion to yet another aspect of variation in the morphology and functioning of the gut of bivalves. There is, however, a facet of functional variation which I believe might be relevant to these studies and which came to my notice while I was conducting some feeding experiments on bi- valves (Mytilus, Cardium), using different unialgal cul- tures. Some of the main points of these observations are: a) the form and type of faecal ribbon ejected from the animal was found to depend upon the time ingested material was retained within the gut; b) this was found to vary with the type of ‘food’ material used (or available to the animal), as well as the rate of its passage through the gut; c) with higher concentration of food material in the medium, strong rejectory mechanisms in the stomach caused ingested matter to be rejected and expelled rap- idly as faeces, at times within 20 minutes of intake; d) faecal ribbons were initially composed wholly of unutilized ‘food’ (in my experiments, live algal cells) loosely bound with quantities of mucus; e) subsequent faecal ribbons were usually of a dif ferent texture, colour and form; and those expelled after an interval of 12 to 20 hours after intake were markedly different in these aspects from the first-formed ribbons; the quantity of mucus in the faeces usually proved to be an indicator of retention-time within the gut: [in Mytilus for example, faecal ribbons varied in cross-section from shapeless to oval to cylindrical mass, with a thick or thin or a separated keel-like part; and in colour from greenish to brownish shades; f ) coarser material tended to be localized in faecal ribbons and these probably marked the sites of grooves in the gut. Therefore, in classifying faecal ribbons on the basis of their physical characteristics, one has to take into account this variability which may be directly related to the amount and type of food available to the animal. Korn- ICKER (1962) has in fact recorded for filibranchs and eulamellibranchs a wide range of faccal types from ‘un- sculptured’ to ‘oval’ to ‘shapeless’ masses. ALLEN (1961) and van WEEL (1961) have reported how faecal material may vary in colour varying with the time within the gut. Observations by LoosaANorF & ENGLE (1947) and Haven & ALAMO (1966) may also be cited in this connection since these authors have drawn attention to negative cor- relation between faeces and total seston and to greater faecal production at lowest levels of seston in oysters. These reveal sources of variability in faecal production according to the amount and type of food available to continuous feeders such as the bivalves. Another consideration is that though the term ‘faeces’ generally means all matter rejected from the gut, usually the larger sense that it specifies refuse matter after digestion is brought in by connotation. This is, for ex- ample, implied in the observations by JEGLA & GREEN- BERG (1968), who regard the “preparation and propul- sion of fecal matter as an important and mandatory function of the rectum” in the bivalves also. The time of retention within the hindgut of ingested matter, as well as the rate of its passage through other regions of the gut are factors to be established for a more functional interpretation of these structures in the bivalves. There appears in fact to be a greater need for observations at different times in natural populations in the field in order to resolve many questions of bivalve nutrition. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I acknowledge with pleasure the kindness of the Director and Staff of the Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, where this work was carried out while I was in receipt of the Royal Society and Nuffield Foundation Commonwealth Bursary. LITERATURE CITED ALLEN, J. A. 1962. Preliminary experiments on the feeding and excretion of bivalves using P32. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 42: 609 - 623 Vol. 11; No. 3 THE VELIGER Page 199 ARAKAWA, KonHMAN Y. 1963. Studies on the molluscan faeces (1). Publ. Seto Mar. Biol. Lab. 11: 185 - 208 1965. Studies on the molluscan faeces (II). Publ. Seto Mar. Biol. Lab. 13: 1-21; plts. 1-6 Haven, D.S. « R. ALamo 1966. Aspects of biodeposition by oysters and other inverte- brate filter feeders. Limnol. & Oceanogr. 11 (4:) 487 - 498 Kornicker, Louis S. 1962. Evolutionary trends among mollusk fecal pellets. Journ. Paleontol. 36: 829 - 834 Jecia, THomas Cyrit « MiciarL, Joun GREENBERG 1968. Structure of the bivalve rectum. — I. Morphology. The Veliger 10 (3) : 253 - 263; plts. 36-40; 1 text fig. (1 January 1968) Loosanorr, Victor L. « James B. ENGLE 1947. Effect of different concentrations of microorganisms on the feeding of oysters (O. virginica). U.S. Wildlife Serv. Fishery Bull. 51. 42: 31 - 57 vAN WEEL, P. B. 1961. The comparative physiology of digestion in molluscs. Amer. Zoologist 1: 245 - 252 Page 200 THE VELIGER Vol ial INoms Volutocorbts and Fusivoluta, Two Genera of Deepwater Volutidae from South Africa HARALD A. REHDER Senior Zoologist, Division of Mollusks Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C. 20560 (Plates 40 to 43) THE SUBMISSION SOME YEARS AGO by Mr. Clifton S. Weaver of Lanikai, Hawaii, and Mrs. Helen Boswell of Valhalla, Transvaal, South Africa, of specimens of deep- water species of volutes from South Africa for identifica- tion induced me to make a study of the species assigned to the genera Volutocorbis and Fusivoluta. To these indi- viduals and to Mr. John E. duPont, Delaware Museum of Natural History, I give my thanks for the loan of important material. In addition, I am grateful to Dr. John A. Grindley, late of the South African Museum of Natural History, and to Mary Louise Penrith, Head of the Department of Marine Biology of that institution, for the loan of specimens studied by Barnard and for information regarding this material. Dr. R. Tucker Ab- bott of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, and Dr. Ruth D. Turner of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, have assisted this project by the loan of specimens. In referring to specimens from these various institu- tions, I have used the following abbreviations: ANSP Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia DMNH _ Delaware Museum of Natural History MCZ Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University SAM _ South African Museum, Cape Town USNM_ United States National Museum VOLUTIDAE FLEMING, 1822 Athletinae Prtspry & Oxisson, 1954 Volutocorbis Datu, 1890 Volutocorbis Dax, 1890, p. 75; BarNarb, 1959, p. 24 This name was originally proposed by Dall as a subgenus of Volutilithes Swarnson, 1831, a taxon of which he considered the type to be Voluta spinosa LaMARCK [= Voluta spinosa (LinnaEus, 1767)] of the Paris Basin Eocene, but which is now recognized to have as type species Voluta muricina LaAMaARCK, 1803, also of the Paris Basin Eocene. At that time, Dall recognized only four species as belonging to Volutocorbis: the type species Voluta lim- opsis Conrap, 1860, Paleocene of Alabama and Texas, V. lima Sowersy, 1823, from the Barton Beds of the English Upper Eocene, V. digitalina Lamarck, 1811, of the Paris Basin Upper Eocene, and the Recent V. abyssi- cola ADAMS & Reeve, 1848. CossMann (1899, p. 138), in reviewing the family Volutidae, considered Volutocorbis to be of only sectional value, placing it under Volutilithes s. str. To Dall’s list of species he added two species from the Paleocene: V. muricata ForBES, 1846, from India and V. radula Fores, 1846, from India and Brazil. The first is not a Voluto- corbis, but the Indian specimens of radula appear to belong to a member of this group, while those from Brazil belong elsewhere in the Volutidae. To the Eocene species he added Volutocorbis crenuli- fera Bayan, 1870 (V. crenulata Lamarck, 1803, not Gein, 1791) from the Lutetian (Middle Eocene) of the Paris Basin. The Oligocene species that he cites as belonging here is not a Volutocorbis but possibly a species of Athleta. The first worker to consider Volutocorbis a distinct genus was R. Bullen Newton in 1906, although other workers still considered it a subgenus or section of Ath- leta. Since 1931, however, the group has quite generally been given generic rank. Vol. 11; No. 3 THE VELIGER Page 201 The following list, undoubtedly incomplete, comprises the fossil species that appear to belong in Volutocorbis Table | Group, Stage, Age or Formation Location Volutocorbis limopsis (Conrap, 1860) Paleocene Midway Alabama, Texas texana PLUMMER, 1933 Paleocene Midway Texas kerenensis PLuMMER, 1933 Paleocene Midway Texas daviest (VREDENBURGH, 1923) Paleocene Ranikot W. Pakistan burtonit (VREDENBURGH, 1923) U. Paleocene _ U. Ranikot W. Pakistan eugeniae (VREDENBURGH, 1923) U. Paleocene — U. Ranikot W. Pakistan ‘victoriae (VREDENBURGH, 1923) U. Paleocene __U. Ranikot W. Pakistan indica DouviLLE, 1929 U. Paleocene U. Ranikot W. Pakistan sykest (p’ArcHiaAc « Hare, 1853) U. Paleocene U. Ranikot W. Pakistan soriensis EAMES, 1952 L. Eocene M. Laki W. Pakistan harnaiensis Cox, 1931 L. Eocene M. Laki W. Pakistan grauert (OPPENHEIM, 1915) L. Eocene Togo olssoni PLUMMER, 1933 L. Eocene L. or M. Wilcox Texas stenzeli PLUMMER, 1933 L. M. Eocene L. Claiborne Texas crenulifera (BAyAN, 1870) M. Eocene Lutetian France pyrenaica (ViILLALTA CoMELta, 1956) M. Eocene Spain pakistanica Eames, 1952 M. Eocene Khirthar W. Pakistan celebesensis (DotiFus, 1915) 4 M. Eocene ? Lutetian Celebes darchiaci (Datton, 1908) U. Eocene Burma digitalina (Lamarck, 1811) U. Eocene Bartonian France, England icket (Martin, 1914) U. Eocene Nanggoelan Java 4 This species was originally assigned to the Oligocene by DoLiFus. The single specimen undoubtedly came from nearby beds of Eocene age (see Martin, 1917) Certain other species originally allocated to Volutocor- bis belong to other genera. Thus, meridionalis OLsson, 1944, from the Upper Cretaceous of Peru and oregon- ensis TURNER, 1928, from the Eocene of Washington are not members of Volutocorbis. Volutocorbis exornata Petuo, 1906, from the Upper Cretaceous of Hungary is close to Lyria. Volutospina multispinosa Newton, 1922, from the Upper Eocene of Nigeria was placed by EAMES (1957, p. 46) in Volutocorbis, but this species also does not belong here. Many of the species placed by PLum- MER (1933, pp. 381-384) in Volutocorbis belong to Athleta. At the present time, four living species, all occurring in the waters off the South African Coast, have been assigned to this genus. These are discussed below along with the description of two new species. Burnett SmitrH (1906) has shown effectively that Volutocorbis limopsis Conrap of the Midway Paleocene is the ancestral form of a phylogenetic line that evolved into the Oligocene species that are now placed in Athlcta (Volutispina). A similar phylogenetic evolution can un- doubtedly be traced out among some of the European species of this complex. In the following systematic review of the Recent spe- cies of the genus, I have figured two of the fossil species to demonstrate their resemblance to some of the Recent species (Plate 42, Figures 26 - 30). The genus Volutocorbis is represented only in the Pale- ocene, Eocene, and Recent, and the considerable gap in time between the fossil species and those found living today, amounting to some forty million years, led me to try to find some tangible differences between the two groups of species. Although some species such as V. abyssicola have evolved characteristics quite divergent from the fossil forms, other recent species resemble the fossil species closely in shape and sculpture; for instance, V. gilchristt SowErBY looks very much like V. digitalina (Lamarck ). I am, therefore, constrained to retain both Recent and fossil species in the one genus. The geographic distribution of this genus in the Pale- Page 202 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 ocene and Eocene coincides very closely with the extent of the Tethys Sea, with the living forms now restricted to the deeper waters off South and Southeast Africa. The protoconch in almost all shells of Recent species that I have seen has been so eroded that the outer shell layer is gone, leaving what appears to be the inner calcitic shell layer. Our single specimen of Volutocorbis gilchristi SowErRBY does show part of the complete protoconch, and from an examination of the latter, we see that it is short and obtuse, consisting of 1¢ smooth glossy whorls (Plate 40, Figure 1). The thin, outer glossy layer in this specimen has become chipped away in places revealing the dull calcitic layer underneath. The protoconch of Volutocorbis limopsis (CoNRAD) has a more slender smooth nucleus of slightly over 2 whorls, but specimens of V. digitalina (LAMARCK) from the Bartonian Upper Eocene of England show a more broadly conical protoconch of about 24 whorls (Plate 40, Figure 2), resembling that found in the Recent V. dispar- lis REHDER, new species. Volutocorbis abyssicola (ADAMS & REEvE, 1848) (Plate 40, Figure 3; Plate 41, Figures 10 to 13) Voluta abyssicola ADAMS & REEvE, 1848, p. 25, pl. 7, fig. 6 Volutilithes abyssicola (ADAMS & REEVE), Woopwarp, 1900, p. 121; Sowersy, 1902, p. 97, pl. 2. fig. 6 Volutocorbis abyssicola (ADAMS & REEVE), BARNARD, 1959, p. 25, figs. 7a, 9a Distribution: In 85 - 300 fathoms off the South African coast from off Hondeklipbaai, Namaqualand, western South Africa, to the southern edge of Agulhas Bank. Remarks: A distinctive species, reaching on occasions a relatively large size (97 mm), it is characterized by its elongate-ovate shape and strong reticulation of axial and spiral sculpture, particularly on the penultimate whorl; the body whorl occasionally shows a greater prominence of the spiral sculpture. The eroded apical whorls suggest a broadly conical protoconch of 2 whorls or less (Plate 40, Figure 3). Barnarp (1959, pp. 26-27) included specimens of Volutocorbis lutosa Kocu and V. boswellae REHDER (de- scribed in this paper) in his concept of V. abyssicola. The characters differentiating the latter from V. lutosa and V. boswellae will be discussed under these species. This species varies considerably in size and somewhat in shape, as well as in the strength and number of the columellar plaits. A comparison of Figures 11 and 12 shows a marked difference in breadth of shell and length of spine. I have seen two specimens (DMNH 19306 and Helen Boswell Collection) from 300 fathoms off Agulhas Bank that are somewhat heavier, with a shorter broader spine, a thickened, rather straight outer lip which is distinctly angulate near its juncture with the body whorl (Plate 41, Figure 13). Volutocorbis lutosa Kocu, 1948 (Plate 40, Figure 6; Plate 41, Figures 14, 15) Volutocorbis lutosa Kocu, 1948, pp. 5-6, pl. 2 Volutocorbis abyssicola var. lutosa Kocu, BARNARD, 1959, p. 27 Distribution: In 40 - 100 fathoms off the western coast of South Africa, from 14 miles almost due south of Cape of Good Hope to the mouth of the Orange River. Remarks: I am retaining this as a species distinct from Volutocorbis abyssicola because of its very striking char- acters: broad-oval shape, shorter body whorl, more or less distinctly shouldered below the suture, and fewer and more irregular folds on the columella. This species seems to inhabit somewhat shallower water than V. abyssicola does, and specimens are frequently more or less encased in a hard, reddish-brown clay. It has to date been found only on the western side of South Africa and off the western slope of the Agulhas Bank. The sculpture on the penultimate and antepenultimate whorls is more distinctly and distantly clathrate than on the body whorl, and the axial sculpture on the last whorl, when present in unworn specimens, consists of more or less distant ribs diminishing in strength towards the base. The rather slender, elevated protoconch apparently consists of about 14 whorls (Plate 40, Figure 6). Volutocorbis boswellae REHDER, spec. nov. (Plate 40, Figure 5; Plate 41, Figures 16 to 19) Diagnosis: Shell glossy, generally smaller than Voluto- corbis abyssicola ADAMS & REEVE, with strong axial ribs, and with the spiral sculpture restricted to the subsutural Explanation of Plate 40 Figure 1: Volutocorbis gilchristi (SowERBY), USNM 652796 Figure 2: Volutocorbis digitalina (Lamarck), USNM 645874 Figure 3: Volutocorbis abyssicola (ADAMS & REEVE), USNM 631849 Figure 4: Volutocorbis disparilis Reuprer, SAM A3335 Figure 5: Volutocorbis boswellae Rruper, SAM A2011 Figure 6: Volutocorbis lutosa Kocu, SAM A2012 Figure 7: Fusivoluta blaizci (BARNARD), SAM A3433 Figure 8: Fusivoluta clarket Rruprr, DMNH 12833 Figure 9: Fusivoluta barnardi Renper, DMNH 10751 Magnification: x 3.75 THE VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 3 [REHDER] Plate 40 Vol. 11; No. 3 area and the lower half of the last whorl. Distribution: In 80 - 300 fathoms off South Africa, from Saldanha Bay to Cape Seal. Description: Shell clongate-ovate in shape, glossy, light yellowish-brown to dark orange-ycllow in color'; some specimens, particularly immature ones, show sevcral rows of squarish maculations of moderate reddish-orange color. Nuclear whorls 2 - 2+, bulbous, subcylindric, with large initial whorl. Postnuclear whorls moderately con- vex, strongly ribbed, with a pronounced shoulder at the suture. Ribs bluntly and broadly angulate, gradually noticeably flattening out towards the base of the body whorl; ribs spinosely nodulate at sutural shoulder, some- times causing whorl to appear channeled at suture; ribs below subsutural row of nodules are depressed followed by a pointed nodulation and another very shallow depres- sion; the result is that whorls in their upper part appear to be encircled by 2 rows of rather sharp nodules sepa- rated by a shallow channel, the upper one being stronger. Upper half of whorl below nodulation without any spiral sculpture, lower half of body whorl marked by broad, shallow grooves very gradually increasing in strength an- teriorly; in some specimens these grooves are faintly noticeable in upper portion of body whorl. Aperture narrow, broadly acuminate at posterior end, broad, with a shallow sinus at anterior end. Outer lip in adult speci- mens with an external, whitish, rather heavy callus, some- what thickened and faintly denticulate within. Columella with 9 to 11 spiral folds increasing in strength anteriorly; immature specimens usually show from 4 to 9 thin folds. A thin whitish glaze, more or less sharply delimited, covers last whorl in columellar area. Holotype: In 300 fathoms off Mosselbaai (Mossel Bay), South Africa (USNM 683585). Measurements (in mm) height diameter locality Holotype 59.1 25.0 off Mosselbaai Paratype 34.35 16.5 off Cape Town Paratype 36.35 Wed off Cape Town Paratype ses) 15.3) off Cape Town Paratype 34.5 15.4 off Cape Town Paratype 36.3 17.0 off Cape Town Paratype 28.9 15.3 off Cape Town Eight other paratype specimens in the collection of the South African Museum from 4 stations off San Sebas- ' Color terminology in this paper from the ISCC-NBS Mcthod (KELLY « Jupp, 1965) THE VELIGER Page 203 tian Bay to Cape Seal in 85 - 90 fathoms vary in length from 24.6 to 43.5 mm. One paratype in the Helen Boswell collection from off Saint Sebastian Bay in 80 - 100 fathoms measures 28.3 mm in height and 11.2 mm in diameter (Plate 41, Figures 15, 16). Another paratype (DMNH 19308) from the same locality measures 24.7 mm in height, and 10.9 mm in diameter. Remarks: I have been able to examine some of the material that K. H. Barnard used in his discussion of this group of species (BARNARD, 1959, pp. 26 - 27). The spe- cimens with reduced spiral sculpture to which he refers belong to this species and not to Volutocorbis abyssicola. It should be pointed out that V. abyssicola and V. bos- wellae, as well as the following species, V. disparilis, have all been collected together at one station, A3335 in 80 to 100 fathoms. The differences between Volutocorbis abyssicola and V. boswellae are well marked, and in the material I have examined I have found no intermediate forms. Not only is the spiral sculpture greatly reduced in V. boswellae, but the axial ribs are much fewer in number, numbering 36 in one specimen of V. boswellac while in a comparable specimen of V. abyssicola the ribs number 60. The sub- sutural nodes are stronger in V. boswellae, which makes the furrow below much more pronounced. The surface in all fresh specimens I have seen of V. abyssicola is dull, whereas V. boswellae has a glossy surface. Volutocorbis disparilis REHDER, spec. nov. (Plate 40, Figure 4; Plate 41, Figures 20 to 22) Diagnosis: Close to Volutocorbis boswellae but smaller, more inflated, with whorls of the spire proportionately broader, the subsutural serics of projections not as pointed but more rounded, and the protoconch broadly conical with about 2} whorls and a small pointed apex. Distribution: Between Cape Town and Mosselbaai, South Africa in 80 - 300 fathoms. Description: Shell glossy when fresh, dark grayish-yellow in color, rather broadly ovate. Protoconch consisting of 24 to 24 whorls, broadly trochoid, with pointed apex and small initial whorl. Postnuclear whorls moderately convex, regularly ribbed, sharply shouldered at the shoul- der where the ribs are marked by an angulate laterally compressed node; below the first series of nodes is a broad spiral groove, followed by another series of obtuse nodes on the ribs, and below that by another broad depression; as in Volutocorbis boswellae the latter 2 spiral grooves are caused by the nodes on the ribs and are not marked Page 204 on the body of the whorl. Central part of body whorl similarly sculptured by ribs and spiral rows of nodules, but showing more or less distinct but narrower spiral grooves; lower half with distinct but broader spiral grooves, rendering ribs closely nodulose. Aperture narrow with shallow sinus at anterior end. Outer lip in adults with a rather thin external callus, and somewhat thick- ened and faintly denticulate within; parietal wall with callus on lower half, bearing 7 to 8 spiral folds, the ante- rior one largest; immature specimens show only 3 slender folds on anterior part of parietal wall. Holotype: In 80 - 100 fathoms, 36°40’ S, 21°26’ E (125 miles off Saint Sebastian Bay), Station A3335, southern slope of Agulhas Bank, South Africa (SAM A3335). Paratypes: One specimen in South African Museum from Station A3335; two specimens (USNM 683651) from 300 fathoms, off Agulhas Bank; three specimens (DMNH 10760) also from 300 fathoms, Agulhas Bank. Measurements (in mm) height diameter Holotype SAM A3335 ZOE 14.0 Paratype SAM 3335 30.7 14.6 Paratype USNM 683651 36.4 16.0 Paratype USNM 683651 32.85 ont Paratype DMNH 10760 3D 17.4 Paratype DMNH 10760 30.9 13.5 Paratype DMNH 10760 30.2 14.0 Remarks: The combination of characters that separate this species from both Volutocorbis abyssicola and V. bos- wellae are such that I am constrained to consider it distinct, and because all three have been brought up in one dredge haul and are clearly distinguishable without any cross-over of characters I cannot but consider them to be three specics. THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 Volutocorbis gilchristi (SowERByY, 1902) (Plate 40, Figure 1; Plate 42, Figures 23, 24) Volutilithes gilchristi Sowersy, 1902, p. 99, pl. 2, fig. 5 Volutocorbis gilchristi (SowERBY), BARNARD, 1959, p. 28 Distribution: In 160-200 fathoms off the coast of Natal, from Durban to northern Zululand. Remarks: This distinctive species is characterized by its small size (25.2 to 30mm long), strong axial sculp- ture, and deeply channeled suture. The specimen figured (USNM 652796), taken from a specimen of Xenophora pallidula Reeve, 1843 trawled in 160-180 fathoms off Zululand, fortunately had the nuclear whorls fairly well preserved. The protoconch (Plate 40, Figure 1) is globosely low- spired, consisting of 12 large smooth, glossy whorls; the thin outer shell layer is broken away in places, revealing the dull shell layer below that is seen in most specimens of Volutocorbis. The inner edge of the outer lip is weakly denticulate as BARNARD (1959, p. 28) mentions, bearing a series of low, rounded, somewhat distant nodules. The columellar folds in this specimen number seven. Measurements: Height, 25.2mm; width, USNM 652796. 11.8 mm. Volutocorbis epigona (Martens, 1904) (Plate 42, Figure 25) Voluta epigona Martens, 1904, pp. 106 - 107, fig. Volutocorbis cpigona (MaRTENS), BARNARD, 1959, p. 28 Distribution: In 224 fathoms off Dar es Salaam, Tan- zania. Remarks: The three specimens and one fragment on which Martens based his description are apparently the only known representatives of this species. For the sake of completeness, I have reproduced the drawing that Explanation of Plate 41 Figure 10: Volutocorbis abyssicola (ADAMS & Reeve), Coll. Helen Boswell (x 1) Figure 11: Volutocorbis abyssicola (ADAMS & ReEvE), ANSP 204528 (x 1) Figure 12: Volutocorbis abyssicola (ADAMS & REEVE), USNM 612629 (x 1) Figure 13: Volutocorbis abyssicola (ADAMS & REEVE), DMNH (x 1) Figure 14: Volutocorbis lutosa KocH, USNM 592439 (x 1) Figure 15: Volutocorbis lutosa Kocu, USNM 612628 (x 1) Figures 16 & 17: Volutocorbis boswellae REHDER, spec. nov., Holotype USNM 683585 (x 1) Figures 18 & 19: Volutocorbis boswellae REHDER, spec. nov. Paratype, Collection Helen Boswell (x 1.7) Figure 20: Volutocorbis disparilis REHDER, spec. nov., Paratype DMNH Figure 21: Volutocorbis disparilis REHDER, spec. nov., Paratype DMNH Figure 22: Volutocorbis disparilis REHDER, spec. nov., Holotype SAM A3335 (x 1.75) Tue VELIcER, Vol. 11, No. 3 [REHDER] Plate 41 Figure 10 Figure 14 Figure 22 Figure 18 Figure 19 Figure 20 Figure 21 Vol. 11; No. 3 THE VELIGER Page 205 accompanies the original description. This species differs from all other living species in the strong subspinose sculpture and the internal liration of the outer lip. The sculpture of Volutocorbis epigona bears consider- able resemblance to the type species V. limopsis (Conrap) from the Paleocene of Alabama and Texas, except that V. limopsis bears strong spiral furrows within the aperture behind the outer lip. Volutocorbis epigona has an even closer resemblance to V. icket Martin, 1914, of the Upper Eocene of Java, in general shape and in the pres- ence of internal furrows (or ridges) on the inside of the outer lip. Volutocorbis limopsis (Conrap, 1860) (Plate 42, Figures 26, 30) Volutilithes limopsis Conran, 1860, p. 292, pl. 7, fig. 24 Volutilithes (Volutocorbis) limopsis Conrap, Dat, 1890, p. 75 Volutocorbis limopsis (Conrap), Newton, 1906, p. 10 Distribution: Alabama and Texas, in the Midway group of the Paleocene. Remarks: ‘This species has two folds near the base of the columella with occasionally a smaller one in between. ‘The specimens figured (USNM 137044) were collected at Matthews Landing, Wilcox County, Alabama. Volutocorbis digitalina (LAMARcK, 1811) (Plate 40, Figure 2; Plate 42, Figures 27 to 29) Buccinum scabriculum SOLANDER in BRANDER, 1766, p. 33, pl. 5, fig. 71 (not Linnarus, 1758) Voluta digitalina Lamarck, 1811, p. 77; DEsHayEs, 1824, p. 693, pl. 93, figs. 1 - 2 Voluta lima Sowrrsy, 1823, p. 136, pl. 398, fig. 2 Distribution: France and England, in the Bartonian Stage of the Upper Eocene. Remarks: This species resembles in general shape Volu- tocorbis gilchristt Sowrrsy but has strongly cancellate sculpture and possesses three or four folds on the lower part of the columella. The specimens figured are from the Paris Basin (Plate 42, Figures 24, 25, USNM 644670) and from the Isle of Wight, England (Plate 42, Figure 26, USNM 644671). Fusivoluta von Martens, 1902 Fusivoluta von Martens, 1902, p. 237; Barnarp, 1959, p. 29 I consider this genus to comprise 7 deepwater species which I discuss below. They occur from off South Africa to off Kenya, East Africa. Fusivoluta elegans BARNARD (1959, p. 32), described from off East London, South Africa, does not appear to be a Fusivoluta and may belong in the Fusinidae. The type of Fusivoluta is Fusivoluta anomala (von MarTENS), designated by M. SmitH (1942, p. 17). Fusivoluta pyrrhostoma Watson, 1882 (Plate 42, Figure 31) Fusus (Sipho) pyrrhostoma Watson, 1882, p. 374; WATSON, 1886, p. 208, pl. 12, fig. 2 Neptuneopsis pyrrhostoma (Watson) Sowersy, 1903, p. 226, pl. 3, fig. 1 Fusivoluta pyrrhostoma (Watson), Martens, 1904, p. 32, pl. 3, fig. 15; BaARNarp, 1959, p. 29, fig. 7 (b, c), 9 (b, c) Distribution: In 39-200 fathoms off the coast of South Africa, from Cape Saint Blaize to Saldanha Bay. Remarks: Large examples of this species were named forma major by BARNarD (1959, p. 30). From an exam- ination of 12 specimens of this large form, ranging in length from 55.9 mm to 83 mm, I can see no reason for giving these specimens a distinctive name, even of infra- subspecific rank. Fusivoluta capensis (THIELE, 1925) (Plate 42, Figure 32) Glypteuthria (?) capensis TuiELE, 1925, p. 179, pl. 19, fig. 27 Glypteuthria capensis Tomutn, 1932, p. 165, fig. 6 (not THIELE) Glypteuthria sculpturata Tomuin, 1945, p. 135 Fusivoluta capensis (THIELE), BARNARD, 1957, p. 210; Bar- NARD, 1959, pp. 30 - 31 Fusivoluta capensis (THIELE), WEAVER, 1965, p. 7, figs. 5, 6 Distribution: In 250 - 560 fathoms from off Cape Point to off Danger Point, South Africa. Remarks: A distinct species because of its less fusiform shape and stronger spiral sculpture. Measurements: Height 30.4mm; diameter 13.0mm (DMNH 10668) figured. Height 30.0mm; diameter 125mm (DMNH 10123). Fusivoluta anomala (Martens, 1902) (Plate 42, Figure 33) Voluta (Fusivoluta) anomala Martens, 1902, p. 237 Fusivoluta anomala (Martens), 1904, pp. 107 - 108, pl. 3, fig. 14 Page 206 Distribution: In 257 - 480 fathoms from north of Zan- zibar Island to off Takaunga, Kenya. Remarks: I have seen no specimens of this species, which is isolated geographically from the other species of the genus. The whorls are more convex and angulate, and the anterior canal seems to be more strongly twisted. Fusivoluta decussata BARNARD, 1959 (Plate 42, Figure 34) Fusivoluta decussata BARNARD, 1959, p. 31, fig. 8c Distribution: In 310 fathoms, 15 miles off mouth of Buffalo River, East London, South Africa. Remarks: This species was assigned to Fusivoluta with some doubt by Barnard, and because of its general form and nature of the nuclear whorls, it may provisionally remain in this genus. I have not seen specimens of this species. Fusivoluta blaizei (BARNARD, 1959) (Plate 40, Figure 7; Plate 43, Figures 35, 36) Fulgoraria blaizei BARNARD, 1959, p. 28, fig. 8 (b) Fusivoluta blaizei (BARNARD), WEAVER, 1963, p. 1; WEAVER, 1964, p. 2 (in part) Distribution: In 105 - 125 fathoms on southern slope of Agulhas Bank off Cape Saint Blaize, South Africa. Remarks: Barnard undoubtedly placed this species in Fulgoraria largely because of the presence of a fold at the base of the columella. Undoubtedly, however, he intended to compare his new species with the Japanese species now placed in Psephaea Crosse, 1871, and not with Fulgoraria, which has a large, bulbous protoconch, and 8 to 12 folds on the columella. From Psephaea, how- ever, this species also differs in the nature of protoconch, the weakness of the columellar fold, and in the propor- tionately shorter aperture and greater length of the spire. THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 Until more adult specimens are found, I follow Weaver in assigning this species to Fusivoluta. The presence of a weak columellar fold may be a juvenile character. I have not seen a specimen, but through the kind cooperation of Mr. John E. duPont, I am reproducing photographs taken by him of the holotype in the South African Museum. Fusivoluta clarket REHDER, spec. nov. (Plate 40, Figure 8; Plate 43, Figures 37 to 39) Diagnosis: Shell rather large, solid, fusiform, of a yellowish flesh color; protoconch of 2 whorls, first 4 whorl low, submersed, rest of protoconch with axially oriented nodules; early postnuclear whorls more or less angulate, with prominent axial ribs, which become obso- lete on the fourth to sixth postnuclear whorl; postnuclear whorls with fine, sharp, subequal, spiral cords. Distribution: In 240-300 fathoms off Lourengo Mar- ques District, Mozambique. Description: Shell dull when fresh, color grayish-yellow- ish pink, covered with a thin, adherent pale brownish- pink periostracum; elongate-fusiform in shape. Proto- conch of about 2 nuclear whorls, usually rather worn, first nuclear whorl low, submersed, subsequent nuclear whorls made angulate by axial peripheral nodules (14 in last nuclear whorl of holotype) ; first postnuclear whorl shows commencement of spiral cords which gradually increase in strength and number, crossing the strong axial ribs, and becoming rather distant; spiral cords number 18 on antepenultimate whorl; on penultimate and ultimate whorl weak threads are often present in the interspaces; axial ribs become weak on fifth postnuclear whorl and disappear on the penultimate and ultimate whorls. Outer lip effuse, occasionally somewhat thickened, and with a broad shallow sinus just above the periphery; internally the outer lip is somewhat thickened, rarely very strongly so, color moderate yellowish-pink in contrast to the pale to light yellowish-pink color of the rest of aperture. Explanation of Plate 42 Figures 23 & 24: Volutocorbis gilchristi (SoOwERBY) , USNM 652796 (x 2) Figure 25: Volutocorbis epigona (MartTENS), copy of original figure (x 1.4) Figure 26: Volutocorbis limopsis (Conrap), USNM 137044 (x 2) Figures 27 & 28: Volutocorbis digitalina (Lamarck), USNM 644670 = (x 2) Figure 29: Volutocorbis digitalina (LAMaRcK), USNM 644671 (x 2) Figure 30: Volutocorbis limopsis (GonraD), USNM 137044 (x 2) Figure 31: Fusivoluta pyrrhostoma (Watson), USNM 612611 (x 1) Figure 32: Fusivoluta capensis (Turete), DMNH 10123 (x 1.7) Figure 33: Fusivoluta anomala (MarTENS), copy of original figure (x 1) Figure 34: Fusivoluta decusssata BARNARD, copy of original figure (x 3) “re THE VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 3 [REHDER] Plate 42 Figure 23 Figure 29 Figure 30 Figure 31 Figure 32 Figure 33 Vol. 11; No. 3 Aperture elongate-acuminate; anterior canal straight, rather short, moderately broad. Columella slightly sinu- ous, without trace of folds, and with a sharply limited yellowish-pink glaze over the parietal wall. Operculum half the size of aperture, elongately ovate, somewhat unguiculate; nucleus terminal, dark brown. Specimens Examined: Holotype (DNMH 12833) and two paratypes (MCZ 264225, USNM 686370): off Joao Belo, District Gaza, Mozambique in 240 fathoms; two paratypes (DMNH 19305): 80km E of Inhaca Island, District Lourengo Marques, Mozambique; paratype (DMNH 19307): 92km E of Inhaca Island. Measurements (in mm) aperture length width length Holotype 96.7 SHES 47.6 Paratype 98.3 B28) AOE Paratype 80.1 28.1 40.6 Paratype 79.8 Diol 39.0 Paratype 75.6 26.9 40.2 Paratype (239) 25 ol) 38.7 locality Off Joao Belo Off Joao Belo * Off Joao Belo Remarks: ‘This species is closest in general size and shape to Fuswvoluta barnardi Reuoer, differing markedly, how- ever, in the stronger sculpture, different protoconch, and in the color of the shell. Fusivoluta blaizei differs from F clarke in the lack of spiral sculpture on the later whorls (except for lirae on the base of the body whorl) and in possessing a smooth bulbous protoconch of 24 whorls (Plate 42, Figure 31). The two paratypes from off Joao Belo, sent originally by C.S. Weaver to Dr. Ruth Turner, contained the soft parts, which, however, were poorly preserved. Dr. Turner was able, nevertheless, to obtain some anatomical infor- mation, which she has kindly permitted me to include in this paper, as follows: The siphon had a large left lobe but no real right lobe. The eyes are minute, black, and situated at the base of the broad flat tentacles. The anatomy of the digestive tract is very close to that figured for the Volutinac (CLENcH & Turner, 1964, p. 136, pl. 82). The racemose salivary glands had nearly disinte- grated, and the tubular glands were so free of them that it is possible that their condition resembles that in the Volutinac. It is, however, equally possible that they were only loosely connected with the racemose glands as in the Zidoninae, and became “easily un- wound” (CLenci & TuRNER, 1964, p. 134) due to THE VELIGER 92km E of Inhaca 80 km E of Inhaca 80km E of Inhaca Page 207 the disintegration of the soft parts. Leiblein’s gland was as in the Volutinae with an enlarged distal end. Both specimens were males, with very large intro- mittant organs. The radula resembles that described and figured for Fusivoluta pyrrhostoma (Watson, 1882) (BaRNARD, 1959, p. 30, fig. 9b, 9c) except that the basal edge is more broadly emarginate, similar to the radula of Callio- tectum vernicosum (Dau, 1890) (Pirspry & OLsson, IQ ES, Jol, Bp oe, 1G). Fusivoluta barnardi Revver, spec. nov. (Plate 40, Figure 9; Plate 43, Figures 40 to 43) Fulgoraria blaizei BARNARD, 1963, p. 163 (not BARNARD, 1959) Diagnosis: Shell rather large, solid, fusiform, with a somewhat bulbous, smooth protoconch of few whorls, early postnuclear whorls angulate, axially ribbed, and with fine spiral threads, which on the later whorls become very fine and obscure, giving a smooth appearance to penultimate and ultimate whorls. Outer lip somewhat effuse. Distribution: Off the Natal coast, South Africa, gener- ally in the vicinity of the mouth of the Tugela River, in 120 - 180 fathoms. Description: Shell rather large, 105 - 117 mm in length, elongate fusiform, dull white in color when fresh, dead shells orange-yellow (stained by iron oxide?). Protoconch large, bulbous, consisting of 1 to 14 smooth whorls; the 8 postnuclear whorls sculptured as follows: first whorl with slightly angulate periphery marked by axially elongate nodules, which are at first crowded, but become gradually more separated; following whorls begin to show spiral cords, at first below the periphery, and then appearing above and gradually becoming more numerous by inter- calation. These fine spiral cords cross axial ribs of which the first few are obscure and somewhat distantly sepa- rated, but then become more pronounced, especially at the periphery, making these whorls subangulate. At about the beginning of the fourth whorl the axial ribs begin diminishing in strength and the whorls become moderate- ly and evenly convex; with the fifth whorl ribs become very faint; on the last two whorls they have completely disappeared, the surface being marked only by irregular growth lines crossing the crowded, fine, unequal, spiral threads and rendering the latter somewhat irregular; on the penultimate whorl of the holotype these fine spiral threads number 62. ‘The body whorl terminates in a moderately short attenuate canal, and the outer lip flares Page 208 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 out somewhat. The aperture is rather elongate, the colu- mella straight, without folds, and the parietal wall is usually covered by a thin glaze. Specimens Examined: Holotype (DMNH 10751): Off Natal coast, trawled in 120 fathoms, June 1962. Paratypes: (USNM 686300) off North Natal to South Zululand coast, trawled in 120 fathoms; (DMNH 10750): off mouth Tugela River, South Zululand, in 160 - 180 fathoms, July 1960. Measurements (in mm) apert. length width length? Holotype (DMNH 10751) Moe 34.6 S28) Paratype (USNM 686300) O34 32:3, 45.2 Paratype (DMNH 10750) WO." B90 45.9 Remarks: ‘This species is closest to Fusivoluta clarkei but can be readily separated from it by the bulbous pro- toconch, the finer, more numerous spiral threads, be- coming obscure on the body whorl, the less prominent axial ribs, and the apparently different color of fresh shells. Fusivoluta clarkei occupies a more northerly geo- graphic range than does F barnardi. LITERATURE CITED ApaMs, ARTHUR « Lovett Aucustus REEVE 1848-1850. The zoology of the voyage of H.M.S.Samarang, under the command of Captain Sir Edward Belcher. Mollusca. London, prts. 1-3: 1-87; 24 plts. Avams, Henry « ArTHUR ADAMS 1853[1853-1858]. The genera of Recent Mollusca; arranged accord- ding to their organization. London (John van Voorst) 1: i to xl; 1 - 484 2 measured to end of anterior canal 3 early whorls and anterior end missing Barnarb, KepreL Harcourt 1957. Glypteuthria capensis: a generic correction. Conch. 24: 210 1959. Contributions to the knowledge of South African marine Mollusca, Part II :Gastropoda: Prosobranchiata: Rhachiglossa. Ann. South Afric. Mus. 45 (1): 1-237; 52 figs. (June) 1963. Fulgoraria blaizei BARNARD. Journ. Conch. 25: 163 Journ. BrANDER, G. 1766. _ Fossilia Hantoniensia collecta, et in Musaeo Britannico deposita. vit 43 pp.; 9 plts. London CLENCH, WILLIAM JAMES & RutH Drxon TurRNER 1964. The subfamilies Volutinae, Zidoninae, Odontocymbioli- nae and Calliotectinae in the western Atlantic. Johnsonia 4 (43): 129-180; plts. 80-114 (13 February 1964) Conrap, Timotuy ABBotTT 1860. Descriptions of new species of Cretaceous and Eocene fossils of Mississippi and Alabama. Journ. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, ser. 2, 4: 275 - 297; plts. 46, 47 Cossmann, ALEXANDRE EpouaRp MAurRICE 1899. __ Essais de paléoconchologie comparée 3: 1-201; 8 plts. Paris Dai, WILLIAM HEALEY 1890. Contributions to the Tertiary fauna of Florida. Pt. 1, Pulmonate, opisthobranchiate and orthodont gastropods. Trans. Wagner Free Inst. Sci., 3: 1 - 200; plts. 1 - 12. DESHAYES, GERARD PAUL 1824. Description des coquilles fossiles des environs de Paris. 2 vols. & atlas. Paris. EAMEs, FRANK EVELYN 1957. Eocene mollusca from Nigeria: a revision. Bull. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) Geology, 3. (2): 25-70; plts. 5-10 KeLty, KENNETH Low & DEANE BREWSTER Jupp 1965. The ISCC-NBS method of designating colors and a dictionary of color names. Nat. Bur. Standards Circ. 553 (reprint ed.) v+158 pp. ISCC-NBS color-name charts illust- rated with centroid colors (Suppl. to NBS Circ. 553) Kocu, H. J. 1948. A new South African Volute. 5-6; plt. 2 Martens, Epuarp [Cart] von Journ. Conch. 23: 1902. Einige neue Arten von Meer-Conchylien aus den Samm- lungen der deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition. Sitzungsber. Ges. Naturf. Freunde, Berlin, 1902: 237 - 244 Explanation of Plate 43 Figures 35 & 36: Fusivoluta blaizei (BARNARD), Holotype SAM A3433 (x 2) Figure 37: Fusivoluta clarkei REupER, spec. nov., Holotype DMNH 12833 (x 1) Figures 38 & 39: Fusivoluta clarkei Revver, spec. nov., Paratype DMNH 19307 (x 1) Figures 40 & 41: Fusivoluta barnardi Rewer, spec. nov., Holotype DMNH 10751 (x 1) Figures 42 & 43: Fusivoluta barnardi Reuper, spec. nov., Paratype USNM 686300 (x 1) Tue VELicER, Vol. 11, No. 3 [ReHpER] Plate 43 Figure 35 Figure 36 Figure 39 Figure 42 Figure 43 Vol. 11; No. 3 THE VELIGER Page 209 Martens, Epuarp [Cart] von 1904. Die beschalten Gastropoden der deutschen Tiefsee- Ex- pedition 1898-1899. A. Systematisch-geographischer Teil. Wiss, Ergebn. deutsch. Tiefsee-Exped. “Valdivia,” 7 (1)(1903): 1 - 146; plts. 1-5 According to J. Thiele (letter, April 14, 1905) this work was published during the second half of January 1904; he re- ceived his copy on January 30, 1904. Martin, [Jouannes] Kari [Lupwic] 1917. Bemerkungen iiber sogenannt oligociine und andere Ver- steinerungen von Celebes. Sammi. Geol. R.-Museums Lei- den (N.E) 2 (7): 299 - 308 Newron, RicHarp BULLEN 1906. Note on Swainson’s genus Volutilithes. Proc. Mala- col. Soc. London 7: 100 - 104; plt. 12 PALMER, KATHERINE VAN WINKLE 1937. The Claibornian Scaphopoda, Gastropoda and dibran- chiate Cephalopoda of the Southern United States. Bull. Amer. Paleontology 7: 730 pp.; 90 plts. Pitspry, Henry Aucustus « AxEL ApoLPH OLSSON 1954. Systems of the Volutidae. 35 (152): 271 - 306; plts. 25 - 28 PLUMMER, FREDERICK ByRON Bull. American Paleont. (7 September 1954) 1933. The geology of Texas; vol. 1: Stratigraphy; part 3: . Cenozoic systems in Texas. Univ. Texas Bull. no. 3232: 519 - 818; plts. 7-10; text figs. 28 - 54 SmitH, BuRNETT 1906. Phylogeny of the races of Volutilithes petrosus. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia (1906): 52-76; plt. 2 SmitH, MaxwELL 1942. A review of the Volutidae. Lantana, Florida 127 pp. incl. 26 plts. Sowersy, GrorcE BrRETTINGHAM, (3"° of name) 1902. Mollusca of South Africa. Cape of Good Hope Department of Agriculture. Marine Investigations in South Africa (1902) : 93 - 100; plt. II Sowersy, GrorcE BretTincHaM, (3° of name) 1903. Mollusca of South Africa. Cape of Good Hope, Depart- ment of Agriculture. Marine Investigations in South Africa 2: 213 - 232; plts. 3-5 SowERBY, JAMES 1823. The mineral conchology of Great Britain. 160 pp.; plts. 307 - 406. London THIELE, JOHANNES vol. 4; 1904. Die beschalten Gastropoden der deutschen Tiefsee-Ex- pedition 1898 - 1899. B. Anatomisch-systematische Untersuch- ungen einiger Gastropoden. Wiss. Ergebn. Deutsch. Tief see-Exped. “Valdivia,” 7 (1) (1903): 147-180; plts. vi-ix 1925. | Gastropoden der deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition. II. Teil. Wiss. Ergebn. Deutsch. Tiefsee-Exped. “Valdivia,’ 1898-1899. 17 (2): 35-382; plts. 13-46; 31 text figs. ToMLIN, JOHN REap LE BrocKTON 1932. | Reports of the marine Mollusca in the collection of the South African Museum. VI - VIII. Ann. South Afr. Mus, 30: 157 - 169; 10 text figs. 1945. Two South African species renamed. 22: 135 Watson, Rosert Booc 1882. Mollusca of the H. M.S. ‘Challenger Expedition. Part XIV. Journ. Linn. Soc. London, Zoology 16: 372-392 1886. Report on the Scaphopoda and Gastropoda collected by H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873 - 1876. Chall. Reprts. Zoology, vol. 15, 756 pp.; 50 plts. Journ. Conch. WEAVER, CLIFTON STOKES 1963. Provisional species list of living Volutidae (Gastropoda) 8 pp. Honolulu, Hawaii 1964. Second provisional list of living Volutidae. Honolulu, Hawaii 1965. _Volute problems. 8 text figs. 10 pp. Hawaiian Shell News 13 (3): 7; Woopwarpb, Martin FouNTAIN 1900. Note on the anatomy of Voluta ancilla (Sov.), Nep- tuneopsis gilchristi Spy., and Volutilithes abyssicola (Ap. & Rve.). Proc. Malacol. Soc. London 4: 117-125 plt. x Page 210 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 List of Type Specimens of Terebridae in the British Museum (Natural History) BY WALTER OLIVER CERNOHORSKY Vatukoula, Fiji Islands and Division of Mollusks, Smithsonian Institution, U.S. National Museum, Washington, D.C. 20560 DuRING A RECENT VIsIT to the British Museum (Natural History), London, I have examined and recorded the dimensions of all Terebridae types preserved in the type- collection of the British Museum. All the types present were photographed in colour, with the exception of 4 Carpenter types from Mazatlan, which have been dealt with recently by Keen (1968). It has been found in some instances that specimens marked in the collection as types or syntypes were in fact neither. Specimens have been selected as “types” which do not correspond with either the original author’s stated dimensions or figure, if such was appended; usually larger or better preserved specimens have been selected as types possibly by Smith, Tomlin or some other worker. Tomuin (1944) suggested that Cuming may have sub- stituted better specimens at a later date and subsequent to the description of the species. My own observations show that such specimens have indeed been added at a later date and were glued to the same tablet as the orig- inal type or type series. The isolation of unequivocal types depends firstly on the undoubted physical and possible presence of such types in the British Museum. If Deshayes for instance described a species from his own collection, we can ex- pect the holotype to be in the Ecole des Mines in Paris and not in the Cuming collection in London. Secondly, the types present must correspond as closely as possible with either the original description, the stated dimensions or the original figure. Only those types which meet the foregoing requirements have been listed as “holotypes.” In a case where 2 or more specimens in a syntype series agree in dimensions with a fraction of a millimeter with the original measurements given for the “type,” an ap- propriate lectotype has been selected. Such holotypes and lectotypes should be interpreted purely as units of refer- ence representative of a species and not as units of natural populations. Hinps (1844) stated his size in “lin.” (= lines) for one particular specimen of a species he described. Since British naturalists used the “inch,” “pollex” or “mm’ as units of measure for mollusks, it is presumed that Hinps (loc. cit.) adopted the French “ligne” of continental authors, and popular with French malacologists at that time, due to the restoration period re-introduction. The French “ligne” is equivalent to 2.25 mm, and using this conversion factor, type specimens present in the type col- lection match the given dimensions far better than the one-tenth of an inch conversion factor adopted by KEEN (1966). Some of the type specimens present in the type col- lection have been marked with an “x” in either the aper- ture of the shell or on the tablet next to the supposed holotype. It should be pointed out that some specimens have been wrongly marked as the type in a few instances. Specimens described by E. A. Smit have a small spot of red wax attached to the type, in some cases in addition to an “x” mark in the aperture or on the tablet; we can presume that these have been marked in this way by Smith himself. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express my appreciation to Dr. N. Tebble, British Museum (Natural History), London, for having made the collection available for examination, and for the help and assistance extended by himself and his staff. This work was supported (in part) by a National Re- search Council postdoctoral Research Associateship with the Smithsonian Institution, U. S. National Museum, Washington, D. C. Wole lili Nox3 THE VELIGER Page 211 LIST or SPECIES Pana (3 le mnn))ies Var bs eraciuionle4 \(— 25.4 mm). Holotype no. 74.11.10.17: 42.5 mm; var. a: 31.0 mm; var. b: 27.6 mm. africana, Terebra — Gray in GRIFFITH & PipcEON, 1834, Moll. Reg. Anim. Cuv., plt. 23, fig. 5. Hab. ? Species are arranged in alphabetical order for quick ref- erence. The following abbreviations for publications and 8. journals have been adopted in this paper: Coll. J. E. Gray. Size of figure: 68.0 mm. Holotype = i f Natural Ao NL INe IRL ate eee see Sree no. 74.10.12.12:67.4mm (marked x inside aperture) ; LGU Beet Canine ee syntype is 61.6mm. = Terebra variegata Gray, 1834. ‘i a : Se ae Gmauisione pare 9. albida, Terebra — Gray, 1834, P.Z.S.L., p. 63. Hab. ? M.P.M.L.P.S. = Memoirs and Proceedings of the Manchester Literary and Philo- Coll. J. E. Gray. Size: 13” (=44.5 mm); Var. a. Coll. J. E. Gray. Size: 14” (=31.7 mm). Holotype no, 74.11.10.4: 34.3 mm. Soltteall Seorstoy 10. albocincta, Terebra (Myurella) — CARPENTER, 1857. PM.S.L. -= Proceedings of the Malacological SECISEEN; re Hine Volts NB 228) jolt, 98) ig, 00. Soccer Uondon = Terebra variegata Gray, 1834. : ; ; 11. albomarginata, Terebra — DesHayes, 1859, P.Z.S.L., Pe Za Sli = Proceedings of the Zoological Soci- 3 : : E ayy of loadin: p. 314. Hab. L’Australie. Coll. Cuming. Size: 44x 8mm. Holotype: 44.5 mm (marked x inside aper- . aciculina, Terebra — Reeve, 1860, Conch. Icon., plt. urte) ; this shell is yellowish-orange in colour with 23, fig. 121 b (non LamMarcx, 1822). Hab. ? Coll. a white sutural band, obsolete axial plicae and 4 Taylor. Size of REEve’s figure: 38.0 mm. Holotype: spiral rows of deep pits on each whorl. There is No. 74.12.11.298: 36.0 mm. another specimen in the same box measuring 39.6 . acuminata, Terebra — REEvE, 1860, Conch. Icon., plt. mm, and the loose label says “Coll. Dr. Gray” — no. 26, sp. 143 (non Borson, 1820; nec GRATELOUP, 74.10.12.14. This Gray specimen is identical in sculp- 1834). Hab. ? Coll. Cuming. Size of figure: 28.5 mm. ture with the holotype of Terebra albomarginata, Holotype: 29.5 mm (marked x near apex of shell on except that it is uniformly dark brown in colour, and tablet). = Hastula exacuminata Sacco, 1891. is the T: cumingit of authors, not of DrsHayes, 3. acuta, Terebra — Desuayes, 1857, J.C. P, 6: 100; 1857. plt. 4, figs. 4, 5. Hab.: les mers de Chine. Size: 57 12. albozonata, Terebra — E. A. Smiru, 1875, A. M.N. 7mm (1857); 977mm (1859). Coll. Cuming. H., 15: 415 and 1877, A.M.N.H., 19: 226. Hab. Supposed holotype: 46.9 mm (marked x inside aper- Matoza Harbour, Japan (Commander St. John). ture). The dimension of 97 mm given by Deshayes Coll. J. G. Jeffreys. Size: 25><7 mm. Holotype, no. in 1859 is certainly an error for 57 mm which was 73.8.6.9: 24.7 mm (spot of red wax on labial lip) ; the largest specimen among the specimens examined paratype: 8.0mm. by Deshayes. The specimen present in the collection 13. ambrosia, Terebra — Metvit, 1912, P.M. S. L., 10: is appreciably smaller. = Terebra anilis (RODING, 250, pit. 11, fig. 10. Hab. Mekran coast, Charbar. 1798). Size: 1644 mm. Holotype no. 1912.9.17.38: 15.9 4. adamsi, Terebra — E. A. Smitu, 1873, A. M.N.H., mm; Paratype no. 1912.9.17.39: 12.4 mm. — Tereb- 11: 264. Hab. Japan (A. Apams). Coll. Cuming. ra exigua DEsHAYES, 1859. Size: 366} mm. Holotype: 35.5 mm; paratypes: 14. amoena, Terebra — Desuayes, 1859, P. Z. S. L., p. 33.6 mm and 21.8 mm. 297. Hab. Les mers de la Chine. Coll. Cuming. Size: 5. adansoni, Terebra — Desuayes, 1859, P.Z.S.L., p. 246mm. Holotype: 24.2 mm. 291. Hab. Sénégal. Coll. Cuming and Deshayes. Size: 15. andamanica, Terebra — MeELviILL & SyKEs, 1898, P 398 mm. There are 3 syntypes in the type collec- M.S. L., 3: 41, plt. 3, fig. 3. Hab. Andaman Islands. tion: 32.6 mm, 32.5 mm and 31.8 mm, but these are Size: 479 mm and 35 <7 mm. Only holotype pres- appreciably smaller than the stated type, which is ent, no. 1895.4.30.2: 47.9 mm (marked x inside aper- possibly in the Deshayes collection in the Ecole des ture). — Terebra pertusa Born, 1778. Mines in Paris. — Terebra micans Hinps, 1844. 16. anomala, Terebra — Gray, 1834, P Z. S. Ibn p. 62. 6. addita, Terebra — Desuayes, 1859, PZ. S.L., p. 293. Hab. ? Coll. J. E. Gray. Size: 12” (= 44.5 mm). Hab. La Terre de Van Diemen. Coll. Cuming. Size: Holotype: 42.6mm (marked x near apex of the 337 mm. Holotype: 32.3 mm. shell on tablet). 7. affinis, Terebra — Gray, 1834, P.Z.S.L., p. 60. Hab. ? 17. antarctica, Abretia — E. A. Smiru, 1873, A. M.N. lel 11: 270. Hab. Antarctic region (“New Zealand” on Page 212 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 18. 20. Zi 22. 23. 24. 2). 26. tablet). Coll. Justice Gillies. Size: 14><44 mm. Holo- type no. 80.7.2.5: 13.3mm; plus 5 paratypes pres- ent in collection. = Terebra tristis DESHAYES, 1859. apicina, Terebra — Desuayes, 1859, P. Z. S. L., p. 284. Hab. Singapore. Coll. Cuming. Size: 225mm; Holotype: 22.7 mm; syntypes 21.2mm and 18.8mm. . apicitincta, Terebra — SowerBy, 1901, P. M.S. L., 4: 5, pit. 1, fig. 14. Hab. The Kowie. Size: 12.53 mm. Holotype no. 1900.5.22.42: 12.6 mm (marked x near apex of shell on tablet) ; paratypes no. 1900.5.22.43- 44: 12.6 and 11.8 mm, respectively. arabella, Terebra — Tureve, 1925, Wiss. Erg. Deut. Thee, lesqp, Walleliy,, 7/8 Sl, jak, AS), ise, De. Isley, Sumatra. Ex coll. Berlin Museum. Three paratypes no. 1948.12.10.5-7. archimedis, Terebra — DESHAYES, 1859, P. Z. S. L., p. 314. Hab. ? Size: 316mm. Holotype: 32.7 mm; syntypes: 39.6mm (this specimen is erroneously marked as the type with an x inside the aperture) and 20.5 mm. This is the Terebra funiculata of au- thors, not of Hinps, 1844. areolata, Terebra — ADAMS & REEVE, 1850, Voy. Sam- arang, p. 30, plt. 10, fig. 23 (non Vertagus areolatus Link, 1807). Hab. China Seas (“Fiji Islands” on label). Size of figure: 36.0 mm. Three syntypes pres- ent, rather questionable ones at that, of which the largest measures 24.0 mm and is marked with x in- side the aperture and near the apex of the shell on the tablet. These 3 specimens are the same species as Terebra kilburni R. D. Burcu, 1965. argus, Terebra — Hinps, 1844, P.Z.S.L., p. 160 (nom. nov. pro Terebra nebulosa KieNER, 1838). Hab. Tahiti, Society Islands, Cuming; and Nukuhiva, Marquesas, Belcher. Size: none given. Lectotype no. 1968253: 88.7 mm; paralectotypes 81.6mm and 74.1 mm. armullata, Terebra — Hinps, 1844, P. Z.S. L., p. 154. Hab. Between Panama and the Bay of Magdalena in Lower California, also Galapagos. Coll. Belcher and Cuming. Size: 22 lin. (= 49.5 mm). Holotype: 49.2 mm; syntypes: 43.3 mm and 43.1 mm. aspera, Terebra — Hinps, 1844, P.Z.S.L., p. 154 (non Bosc, 1801). Hab. Panama, Monte Christi, St. Ele- na, west coast of America (‘Punta St. Elena, West Colombia” on label). Coll. Cuming. Size: 23 lin. (= 51.8mm). Holotype: 54.5 mm (marked x in- side aperture) ; syntypes: 46.8 mm and 37.9 mm. assimulis, Acus (Abretia) — Ancas, 1867, P.Z.S. L., p. 111, plt. 13, fig. 8. Hab. Dredged in Port Jackson. Coll. Angas. Size: 54> 14 lines (= 12.4X3.4mm). Holotype no. 70.10.26.53: 11.7 mm; syntype: 10.2 mm. = Terebra fictilis Htnps, 1844. Pall 28. 2OF 30. Ble 32) 33) 34. 35. 36. Sie 38. australis, Terebra — E. A. Smiru, 1873, A. M.N. H., 11: 264. Hab. Swan River, and Paterson’s Bay, Tor- res Strait, North Australia (J. R. Elsey). Size: 55 124 mm. Holotype: 54.4 mm. bacillus, Terebra — DEsSHAYES, 1859, P. Z. S. L., p. 285. Hab. files Sandwich. Coll. Cuming. Size: 235 mm. Holotype: 22.9 mm; syntypes: 22.0mm, 19.4 mm, 17.4 mm, and 17.0 mm. ballina, Duplicaria — HEpiey, 1915, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. W, 39: 729, plt. 84, fig. 86. Hab. Trial Bay, N. S. W. Coll. Hedley. Paratype: 19.6 mm. bathyrhaphe, Terebra (Myurella) — E. A. Situ, 1875, A.M.N.H., 15: 415 and 1877, A. M.N.H., 19: 226. Hab. Gulf of Yedo, Japan (Commander St. John). Coll. J. G. Jeffreys. Size: 255mm. Holo- type no. 73.8.6.10: 24.8mm (spot of red wax on columella) ; syntypes: 21.7 mm, 20.0 mm, 17.0 mm, and 10.3 mm. belcheri, Myurella — E. A. Smitu, 1873, A. M.N. H., 11: 267 (non Terebra belcherit Puiuipri, 1851). Hab. Guayaquil, Ecuador. Coll. Belcher. Size: 398 mm. Holotype no. 44.6.7.77: 38.0 mm. = Terebra guay- aquilensis E. A. Smiru, 1880. bernardu, Terebra — DesHayes, 1857, J. C. P, 6: 84, pit. 4, fig. 10. Hab. Les cétes orientales de l’Australie. (Moreton Bay on label). Coll. Cuming. Size: 58 14mm. Holotype: 57.4 mm (marked x inside aper- ture) ; syntypes: 52.8 mm and 49.9 mm. bicolor, Acus (Abretia) — ANGAs, 1867, P. Z. S. L., p. 111, plt. 13, fig. 7. Hab. Dredged in Middle Har- bour, Port Jackson. Coll. Angas. Size: 82 lines (= 1844 mm). Six syntypes: 15.0 mm, 15.0 mm, 14.3 mm, 13.4 mm, 12.8 mm, and 11.6 mm. bifrons, Terebra — Hinps, 1844, P. Z. 8. L., p. 155. Hab. Japan; leg. Dr. Siebold. Coll. Cuming. Size: 23 lines (= 51.8 mm). Holotype no. 1968237: 51.0 mm (marked x inside aperture). There is another specimen present in the type collection 45.3 mm in length, which is not a type, as Hinps (1844) men- tioned the specimen he described to be unique. bipartita, Terebra — DrEsHaAyeEs, 1859, P Z. S. L., p. 284 (non Sowersy, 1850). Hab. les Sandwich. Coll. Cuming. Size: 225 mm. Holotype: 22.3 mm; syntype: 19.1 mm. = Hastula albula (MENkE, 1843). blanda, Terebra — DesHAyeEs, 1859, P. Z. S. L., p. 298. Hab. Les mers du Japon. Size: 308mm. Holotype: 29.9 mm. booleyi, Terebra crenulata var. — MELVILL & SYKES, 1898, PR M.S. L., 3: 44, plt. 3, fig. 5. Hab. Andaman Islands. Size: not given. Holotype: 68.7mm. = Terebra crenulata (LinNAEUuS, 1758). bourguignati, Terebra — DesHAYES, 1859, P.Z. S. L., Wolm il INoes3, 39. 40. Al. 42. 44. 4n3). 46. ae 48. ars), p. 288. Hab. Les mers de la Chine. Coll. Cuming and Deshayes. (“coll. Fortune” on label). Size: 19 4mm. Paratype only present, measuring 14.5 mm; holotype probably in Ecole des Mines in Paris. = Terebra plumbea Quoy & Gamarp, 1833. brasiliensis, Abretia — E. A. Smiru, 1873, A. M.N. H., 11: 271. Hab. Botafogo Bay, Rio de Janeiro (Macgillivray, H. M.S. Rattlesnake). Size: 113 mm. Holotype no. 60.5.2.28: 10.3 mm; syntypes: 9.0 mm and 7.5mm. brazieri, Terebra (Hastula) — Ancas, 1871, P.Z. S.L., p. 16, plt. 1, fig. 15. Hab. Brisbane Water, New South Wales; Brazier. Size: 1” 2 lines 3 lines (—29.9 6.8mm). Holotype no. 71.7.5.15: 27.8mm; syn- types: 26.2 mm, 25.8 mm, and 23.2 mm. brevicula, Terebra — DESHAYES, 1859, P. Z.S. L., p. 296. Hab. La Terre de Van Diemen. Coll. Cuming. Size: 37><8 mm. Two specimens present: 25.6 mm (erroneously marked x inside aperture) and 21.6 mm, but neither corresponds with Deshayes’ given size. bruguicri, Terebra — DesHayes, 1859, P. Z. S. L., p. 297 (nom. nov. pro Terebra hindsii DEsHAyEs, 1857), Hab. La Chine. Coll. Cuming. Size: 429 mm. Holotype: 39.8mm (marked x inside aperture) ; syntype: 37.5mm, — Terebra conspersa Hutnps, 1844. . buccinulum, Terebra — DesHayes, 1857, J. C. P, 6: 92. pit. 5, fig. 12. Hab. lAustralie, céte orientale. Coll. Cuming. Size: 37><10mm. Lectotype: 37.1 mm; syntypes: 36.9mm, 36.0mm, and 36.0 mm. This is the same species as Bullia turrita Gray, 1839. caelata, Terebra — ADAMS & REEvE, 1850, Voy. Sam- arang, p. 30, plt. 10, fig. 22. Hab, China Seas. Size of figure: 40.6 mm. Holotype: 41.0 mm. — Terebra fenestrata Hinps, 1844. caledonica, Terebra — Sowersy, 1909, PR M.S. L., 8: 198, text fig. Hab. Isle of Pines, New Caledonia. Size: 47><11 mm. Holotype no. 1909.10.19.103: 46.8 mm. caliginosa, Terebra — DesuHayeEs, 1859, P. Z. S. L., p. 287. Hab. Isles Philippines. Coll. Cuming. Size: 30 “6mm. Holotype: 29.7 mm. capensis, Myurella — E. A. Smiru, 1873, A. M. N. H., 11: 269. Hab. Port Elizabeth, Cape of Good Hope. Size: 19><5 mm. Holotype: 17.0 mm; syntypes: 14.1 mm, 12.7 mm 11.6 mm, 9.2 mm, and 9.0 mm. casta, Terebra — Hinps, 1844, P.Z.S. L., p. 156. Hab. Tlo-Ilo, Island of Panay, Philippines. Size: 13 lin. (= 29.2mm). Holotype no. 1968242: 29.0 mm; syntypes: 38.2 mm, 33.3mm, 32.5 mm, and 30.3 mm. = Hastula alba (MENxkE, 1843). celidonota, Terebra — MELVILL & Sykes, 1898, P.M. S.L., 3: 42, plt. 3, fig. 2, Hab. Andaman Islands. THE VELIGER 50. 58), OAs ie 60. Page 213 Size: 153mm. Holotype no. 98.4.30.5: 15.0 mm; paratype no. 98.4.30.6: 13.2 mm. = Hastula strigi- lata (LINNAEUS, 1758). cernohorskyi, Hastula (Punctoterebra)—R.D. Burcu, 1965, The Veliger 7: 244, plt. 31, fig. 3. Hab. Nata- dola, Fiji Islands. Coll. W. O. Cernohorsky. Para- type no. 1965142: 59.8 mm. Rather similar to Has- tula laurina (Hinps, 1844). . cinctella, Terebra — Desuayes, 1859, P. Z. S. L., p. 305. Hab. L’embouchure de l’Indus. Coll. Cuming. Size: 296 mm. Holotype: 27.8 mm; syntypes: 31.0 mm (erroneously marked x inside aperture), and 26.9 mm. . circinata, Terebra — Desuayes, 1857, J. C. P, 6: 99, plt. 4, figs. 6, 7. Hab. les mers de Chine. Coll. Cu- ming. Size: 42 <6 mm. Holotype: 41.3 mm (marked x inside aperture). == Tercbra anilis (ROpING, 1798). circumcincta, Terebra — DesHayeEs, 1857, J. C. P, 6: 77, pit. 3, fig. 9. Hab. la mer Rouge (Red Sea and Port Curtis on label). Coll. Cuming (ex Stutchbury). Size: 408 mm. Holotype: 38.0 mm (marked x in- side aperture) ; probable syntype: 50.1 mm. cognata, Terebra (Myurella) — E. A. Situ, 1877, A. M. N. H., 19: 229. Hab. Persian Gulf (Colonel Pelly). Size: 1434mm. Coll. R. MacAndrew. Holotype: 73.7.5.7: 13.3mm (spot of red wax on whorl above aperture and marked x near apex of shell on tablet) ; syntypes: 6.1 mm, and 5.6 mm. 5. columellaris, Terebra — Hinps, 1844, P. Z. S. L., p. 151. Hab. ? (“Tahiti?” on label). Coll. Cuming. Size: 19 lin. (= 42.8mm). Holotype no. 1968228: 43.0 mm; syntypes: 44.0 mm (erroneously marked x in aperture), and 40.8 mm. . concolor, Terebra — E. A. Smiru, 1873, A. M. N. H., 11: 265. Hab. ? Size: 226mm. Holotype no. 1858. 5.12.252: 22.0mm. This appears to be a worn speci- men of Duplicaria jukesu (DESHAYES, 1857). consobrina, Terebra — Desuayes, 1857, J. C. P, 6: 72, pit. 3, fig. 3. Hab. la mer Rouge (“Massau, Red Sea” on label). Coll. Cuming. Size: 93> 14mm (9312mm in 1859). Holotype: 89.3 mm; _syn- types 88.5 mm, and 84.0 mm. . consors, Terebra — Hinps, 1844, P Z. 8. L., p. 150. Hab. Tahiti, Socicty Islands. Coll. Cuming. Size: 31 lin. (= 69.8 mm). Holotype no. 1968173: 70.9 mm; syntypes: 53.2 mm, and 46.8 mm. . conspersa, Terebra — Hinps, 1844, P. Z. S. L., p. 153. Hab. Catbalonga, island of Samar, Philippines. Coll. Cuming. Size: 10 lin. (= 22.5mm). Holotype: 23.5 mm; syntype: 19.5 mm. continua, Terebra — Desutayes, 1859, P. Z. S. L., p. 286. Hab. ? (“Japan” on label). Coll. Cuming and Deshayes. Size: 317mm. Holotype: 32.5 mm, Page 214 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 61. 62. 63. 64. 65. 67. 66. 68. 69. contracta, Myurella — E. A. Smiru, 1873, A. M. N. H., 11: 268. Hab. ? Coll. Belcher. Size: 173% mm. Holotype: 16.00mm._. copula, Terebra — Hinps, 1844, P Z.S.L., p. 151. Hab. Guinea. Coll. Cuming. Size: 17 lin. (= 38.3 mm). Holotype no. 1968227: 39.4mm; syntypes: 33.8 mm, and 29.8 mm. crenifera, Terebra — DesuayeEs, 1859, P. Z. S. L., p. 298. Hab. les mers de la Chine. Coll. Cuming. Size: 306mm. Holotype: 29.8 mm. This species is oc- casionally synonymized with T: cingulifera LAMaARCK, 1822, but it is not that species; the locality itself is cispect. The type of T: crenifera bears a great resem- blance to T: ligyrus Prtspry & Lowe, 1932: the vxial ribs are well defined and slender and form slender nodes at the sutures; the interstices are very broad and there are traces of an orange-brown colour on the shell and in the interstices of the sut- ural nodes. cumingu, Terebra — DESHAYES, 1857, J. C. P, 6: 66, pit. 3, fig. 1. Hab. les mers de Chine. Coll. Cuming. Size: According to DesHayes (1857), he examined 3 examples, the largest of which measured 95x12 mm. Holotype: 93.0mm; only one syntype: 58.3 mm. cuspidata, Terebra — Hinps, 1844, P. Z. S. L., p. 157 (non Bosc, 1801). Hab. Cape Coast, Africa. Coll. Cuming. Size: 13 lin. (= 29.3 mm). Holotype no. 1968247: 29.4mm; syntypes: 29.9mm, and 27.7 mm. = Hastula traillu (DESHAYEsS, 1859). delicatula, Terebra — Preston, ? Hab. Martinique on label. Holotype no. 1911.8.22.273: 9.0 mm. I was not able to trace the reference for this species. decorata, Terebra — DesuHayEs, 1857, J. C. P, 6: 75, pit. 4, fig. 13. Hab. Pidang (ile Sumatra). Capt. Martin. Coll. Cuming. Size: 286mm. Holotype: 27.0 mm. There is another specimen in the type col- lection, 44.0 mm in length, which was collected by Lt. Col. Wilmer at Aden, and is not a type. (= “T. tessellata Gray, 1834”, on label). dillwyni, Terebra — DEsHAYES, 1859, P. Z. S. L., p. 279. Hab. les mers du Japon. Coll. Cuming and Deshayes. Size: 409mm. Holotype: 38.9 mm; juvenile syntype: 12.6 mm. diversa, Terebra (Abretia) — E.A.Smiru, 1901, J.C. L., 10: 115, plt. 1, fig. 6. Hab. Umzinto, Natal (H. Burnup). (On label is written “Turton”, not Burnup). Size: 275mm. Questionable syntypes: 22.5 mm, 17.6 mm, and 17.6 mm. These syntypes appear to be the same species as Hastula parva (Bairp in BRENCH- LEY, 1873), except that on the latter species the sut- ural brown spots are set closer. 70. 71. 2 73: 74. 78). 76. die 78. 9). 80. edgaru, Terebra — Metvi1, 1898, M.P M.L. PS., 42: 8, plt. 2, fig. 12. Hab. Karachi. Size: 19<44mm. Holotype no. 98.7.5.32: 19.0 mm — juvenile speci- men. elata, Terebra — Hinps, 1844, P. Z. S. L., p. 156. Hab. Bay of Montijo, west coast of America. Coll. Cum- ing. Size: 12 lin. (= 27.0 mm). Holotype no. 1968- 240: 26.6 mm; syntypes: 24.9 mm, and 24.3 mm. evoluta, Terebra — DesHayes, 1859, P Z. S. L., p. 292. Hab. Japon. Coll. Cuming. Size: 5011 mm. Probable holotype: 56.2mm; syntypes: 29.6 mm, 22.3 mm, and 21.7 mm. exigua, Terebra — DresHayeEs, 1859, P. Z. S. L., p. 301. Hab. La céte orientale d’Australie. Coll. Cum- ing. Size: 1934 mm. Holotype: 20.8 mm; there is another 14.6 mm specimen in the type collection ex Wilmer from the Andaman Islands, which is not a type. fatua, Terebra — Hinps, 1844, P. Z.S. L., p. 150. Hab. St. Christopher, West Indies (Mr. Miller, 1799). Coll. Cuming. Size: 34 lin. (= 76.5 mm). Holotype no. 1968175: 74.9 mm (marked x inside aperture) ; syntype: 62.7 mm. fenestrata, Terebra — Hinps, 1844, P Z.S. L., p. 153. Hab. San Nicholas, Island of Zebu, Philippines. Coll. Cuming. Size: 15 lin. (=33.7 mm). Holotype no. 1968233: 32.7 mm; syntypes: 31.3 mm and 30.0 mm. festiva, Terebra — Desuayes, 1857, J. C. P, 6: 74, plt. 3, fig. 4. Hab. le Sénégal. Coll. Cuming. Size: 35 <8 mm (398 mm in 1859). Holotype: 35.5 mm; syn- types: 36.7mm (wrongly marked x in aperture), and 32.8mm. = Terebra senegalensis LAMARCK, 1822. fictilis, Terebra — Hinps in Sowersy, 1844, Thes. Conch. 1: 183, plt. 45, figs. 109, 110. Hab. Australia. Coll. Cuming. Size of figure: 144 mm. Holotype: 14.8 mm; syntypes: 15.9 mm, and 12.6 mm. fijiensis, Myurella — E. A. Smiru, 1873, A. M.N. H., 11: 266. Hab. Ovalau, Fiji Islands (J. McGillivray on label). Size: 214mm. Holotype no. 1856.10. 27.8: 19.8 mm. fimbriata, Terebra — DesHayeEs, 1857, J. C. P, 6: 71, plt. 5, fig. 1. Hab. ? (Coll. Cuming and Deshayes in 1859). Size: 8819 mm. Paratype: 71.7 mm (holo- type probably in Ecole des Mines in Paris). = Terebra crenulata (LinnaEus, 1758). flava, Terebra — Gray, 1834, P. Z.S. L., p. 60. Hab. ? Size: 1” (= 25.4 mm). Holotype: 23.4 mm (marked x inside aperture). = Terebra lutescens E. A. Smiru, 1873. Vol. 11; No. 3 81. 82. 83. 84. 85. 86. 87. 88. 89. 90. flavescens, Terebra — Desuayes, 1859, P. Z.S. L., p. 299. Hab. Les files Sandwich. Coll. Cuming (“Mr. Pease” on label). Size: 45><9 mm. Holotype: 44.6 mm. formosa, Terebra —- Desuayes, 1857, J. C. P, 6: 65, plt. 3, fig. 6. Hab. la mer de Panama. Coll. Cuming. Size: 7213 mm. Holotype: 70.9 mm. fortunei, Terebra — Desuayes, 1857, J. C. P, 6: 79, pit. 4, fig. 1. Hab. les mers de Chine. Coll. Cuming. Size: 699mm. Holotype: 68.1 mm. funiculata, Terebra — Hinps, 1844, P. Z. S. L., p. 153. Hab. ? (“Marquesas” on label). Coll. Belcher and Cuming. Size: 23 lin. (= 51.7 mm). Holotype: 50.3 mm (marked x inside aperture) ; syntype: 46.5 mm. (Terebra langfordi Pitspry, 1921 is a synonym). fuscobasis, Terebra (Myurella) — E. A. Smiru, 1877, A. M. N. H., 19: 227. Hab. Persian Gulf (Colonel Pelly). Coll. R. MacAndrew. Size: 1133mm. Holotype: 11.3 mm (spot of red wax on whorl above aperture) ; syntype: 9.2 mm. fuscocincta, Terebra (Myurella) — E. A. Smiru, 1877, A. M.N. H., 19: 228. Hab. Persian Gulf (Colonel Pelly). Coll. R. MacAndrew. Size: 8><2 mm. Holo- type no. 73.7.5.3: 7.7 mm (spot of red wax on whorl above aperture); syntypes: 6.3mm, 5.3mm, 4.9mm, and 3.8 mm. geminata, Terebra — Desuayes, 1859, P. Z. S. L., p. 296. Hab. Cap Natal. Coll. Cuming. Size: 307mm. Holotype: 30.3mm (marked x inside aperture) ; syntype: 264mm. = Terebra spectabilis Hinps, 1844. glabra, Terebra — Desuayes, 1857, J. C. P, 6: 101, pit. 5, fig. 13. Hab. les mers de Chine. Coll. Des- hayes. Size: 7013mm. The specimen present in the Cuming Collection and measuring 43.3 mm in length is not a type; the holotype is probably in the Ecole des Mines in Paris. The specimen present is a worn Terebra consors Hinps, 1844. glauca, Terebra — Hinps, 1844, P. Z. S. L., p. 155. Hab. ? Coll. Cuming. Unique! Size: 14 lin. (= 314 mm). Probable holotype: 27.8mm. There is another specimen present in the type collection, measuring 18.3 mm and from the Seychelles; since Cuming’s specimen was said to be unique, the Seychelles speci- men is a later addition. gotoensis, Terebra — E. A. Smitu, 1879, P. Z.S.L., p. 183, plt. 19, figs. 1, la. Hab. Goto Island, Japan. Coll. J. G. Jeffreys. Size: 255mm (fig. 1); var- iety: 2942 mm (fig. la). Holotype no. 78.11.7.18: 25.1 mm (spot of red wax on whorl above aper- ture) ; paratype of variety 29.3 mm; a third syntype: 16.4mm.= Hastula melanacme (E. A. Smiru,1877). THE VELIGER Oe 92. 93} 94. 95. 96. Di. 98. 99. Page 215 gouldu, Terebra — DesHayeEs, 1857, J. C. P, 6: 89, pl. 5, fig. 2. Hab. les iles Sandwich. Coll. Cuming and Deshayes. Size: 70 18mm. Paratypes: 61.6 mm (wrongly marked x inside aperture), and 59.2 mm. Holotype is probably in the Ecole des Mines in Paris. gracilis, Terebra — Retve, 1860, Conch. Icon., plt. 24, spec. 131 (non Lea, 1833; nec Gray, 1834). Hab. Africa. Size of figure: 21.6 mm. Holotype no. 74.10 29.2: 22.0mm. (“Coll. J. E. Gray” on loose label). According to SmirH (1877), T. gracilis REEVE is not the T. gracilis of Gray; he points out that T: gracilis Gray was mounted on the same tablet as T. gracilis REEVE. This would account for the “Coll. J. E. Gray” on the loose label. On the reverse side of the tablet on which the specimen of T: gracilis REEVE is present- ly mounted, is the following note: “this specimen is figured by Reeve as the type of gracilis. For the true type see another tablet.” No such tablet with Gray’s T. gracilis could be traced. REEvE’s T. gracilis is a small specimen of T: spectabilis Hinps, 1844, with fewer ribs per whorl. granulosa, Myurella — E. A. Smitu, 1873, A. M. N. H., 11: 268 (non Terebra granulosa Lamarck, 1822). Hab. Japan (A. Adams). Coll. Cuming. Size: 266 mm. Holotype: 24.6 mm (marked x next to specimen on tablet) ; syntypes: 21.8 mm, and 18.2 mm. = Terebra pustulosa E. A. Smiru, 1879. gray, Terebra — E. A. Smiru, 1877, A. M. N. H., 19: 227 (nom. nov. pro Terebra gracilis Gray, 1834). No types present in the type collection. guayaquilensis, Terebra — E. A. Smiru, 1880, P. Z. S. L., p. 481 (nom. nov. pro Myurella belcheri E. A. SmitH, 1873 — non Terebra belchert Puiuprt, 1851). For types see under Myurella belcheri E. A. SmitH; this appears to be an earlier name for Terebra monti- joensis Pitspry « Lowe, 1932. helichrysum, Terebra — MELvILL & STANDEN, 1903, A. M. N. H., 12: 310, plt. 22, fig. 14. Hab. Persian Gulf, Mussandan. Size: 245mm. Holotype no. 1903.12.15.117: 244mm; paratype no. 1903.12.15. 118: 15.3 mm. hindsii, Terebra (Myurella) — Carpenter, 1857 — see KEEN, 1968, p. 428, plt. 58, figs. 71a-b. bra variegata Gray, 1834. hindsi, Terebra — DESHAYES, 1857, J. C. P, 6: 81, plt. 5, fig. 5 (non CarPENTER, 1857). Hab. les mers de Chine. Coll. Cuming. Size: 429 mm. Only one spe- cimen present in the type collection which measures 27.6 mm; it is a worn T. conspersa Hinps, 1844. incolor, Terebra — Desuayes, 1859, P. Z. S. L., p. 283. Hab. fles Philippines. Coll. Cuming. Size: 34> 8mm. Holotype: 33.4mm. =Hastula alba (MEN- KE, 1834). ——Wene= Page 216 100. 101. 102. 103. 104. 105. 106. 107. 108. 109. 110. incomparabilis, Terebra — DesuayeEs, 1859, P. Z.S. L., p. 307. Hab. Panama. Coll. Cuming. Size: 85 13 mm. Holotype: 84.6 mm; there is a slightly shoul- dered ridge in the centre of each whorl and the 2 spiral rows of spots are equal sized. = Terebra lingualis Hinps, 1844. inconstans, Terebra — Hinps, 1844, P. Z. S. L., p. 156. Hab. Sandwich Islands. Coll. Cuming. Size: 16 lin. (= 36.0 mm). Lectotype no. 1968243: 33.2 mm; syntypes: 33.1 mm, and 32.6 mm. insalli, Terebra (Triplostephanus) — BRATCHER & Burcu, 1967, The Veliger, 10: 7, plt. 2, figs. 1-3. Gulf of Akabar (sic). Paratype: 52.4 7.9 mm. insignis, Terebra — DESHAYES, 1857, J. C. P, 6: 70, plt. 3, fig. 2. Hab. Panama. Size: 7815 mm. Holo- type: 77.0mm; another specimen, possibly added later, 118.7 mm. = T: lingualis Hinps, 1844. interlineata, Terebra — DESHAYES, 1859, P. Z. S. L., p. 277. Hab. Les files Sandwich. Coll. Cuming. Size: 60.0 mm. Holotype: 61.2 mm, = juvenile specimen of Terebra crenulata (LinNaAEus, 1758). intertincta, Terebra — Hinps, 1844, P. Z. S. L., p. 155. Hab. Gambia. Coll. Cuming and Saul. Size: 20 lin. (= 45.0 mm). Holotype no. 1968235: 44.1 mm; syntypes: 42.7 mm, and 40.4 mm (this specimen is erroneously marked x inside aperture). The local- ity indication is obviously erroneous; the species re- sembles in form, colour and sculpture the species T: armillata Hinps, 1844. The figure of T: intertincta in Keen (1958) is dissimilar to the type, which has vertically concave whorls. japonica, Terebra — E. A. Smitu, 1873, A. M.N. H., 11: 265. Hab. Japan (A. Apams). Size: 327 mm. Holotype: 31.4mm (marked x inside aperture) ; syntypes: 29.3 mm, and 26. 8mm. jeffreysu, Terebra — E. A. Situ, 1879, P. Z. S.L., p. 184, plt. 19, fig. 2. Hab. Station 20 & 21, Japan. Size: 255 mm. Holotype no. 78.10.16.4: 25.0 mm (spot of red was on body whorl); syntypes: 22.5 mm, 21.0mm, and 13.2 mm. jenningsi, Terebra (Triplostephanus) — R. D. Burcu, 1965, The Veliger, 7: 248, plt. 31, fig. 9. Hab. Namo- tu Island, Fiji Islands. Coll. W. Cernohorsky. Para- type no. 19655143: 47.8 mm. jukesu, Terebra — DesuayeEs, 1857, J. C. P, 6: 95, pit. 6, fig. 9. Hab. Port Essington. Coll. Cuming. Size: 338 mm. Holotype: 32.8 mm; syntype: 34.2 mm (erroneously marked x inside aperture). kienert, Terebra — Desuayes, 1859, P. Z. S. L., pp. 292, 294. Hab. La Terre de Van Diemen. (‘“‘Tas- mania” on label). Coll. Cuming and Paris Museum. THE VELIGER I. 2, 113. 116, 13), 116. il 118. 118), 120. Walle 122. Vol. 11; No. 3 Size: 226 mm. Holotype: 21.2 mm; syntype: 19.1 mm. kilburni, Terebra (Decorthastula)- R. D. Burcu, 1965, The Veliger, 7: 249, plt. 31, fig. 8. Hab. Off Wading Island, Fiji Islands. Coll. W. Cernohorsky. Paratype no. 1965141: 16.3 mm. knockert, Terebra — E. A. Smiru, 1871, P. Z. S. L., p. 730, plt. 75, fig. 7. Hab. Whydah [West Africa]. Size: 204 mm. Lectotype no. 70.1.3.47: 18.9 mm; syntypes: 18.6mm, 14.9mm, 14.5mm, and 13.8mm. = Hastula modesta (DEsHAYEs, 1859). knorri, Terebra — Gray, 1834, P. Z. S. L., p. 59. Hab. ? Size:25 <4” (= 634 12.7 mm). Holotype: 62.7mm. = T. chlorata LaMarck, 1822. lactea, Terebra — DesHayes, 1859, P. Z. S. L., p. 285. Hab. Isles Sandwich (“Vasigapatam, Dr. Traill” on label). Coll. Cuming and Deshayes. Size: 214 mm. Probable holotype: 19.6mm; syntypes: 18.2 mm, and 16.0mm. =Hastula bacillus (DESHAYES, 1859). laevigata, Terebra — Gray, 1834, P. Z. S. L., p. 61. Hab. ? Size: 13” (= 31.7 mm). Holotype no. 74.11. 10.9: 28.0 mm; syntype: 21.7 mm. laevis, Terebra — Gray, 1834, P. Z. S. L., p. 61. Hab. ? Size: 14” (= 31.7mm). Probable holotype no. 74.11.10.10: 34.3 mm. == T. cingulifera LAMarcK, 1822. larvae formis, Terebra — Hinps, 1844, P. Z. S. L., p. 155. Hab. St. Elena, Monte Christi, west coast of America (“Punta St. Elena, West Colombia” on label). Coll. Cuming. Size: 23 lin. (= 51.7 mm). Holotype no. 1968239: 50.7 mm; syntypes: 37.3 mm, and 31.7 mm. laurina, Terebra — Hinps, 1844, P. Z. S. L., p. 152. Hab. Western Africa. Coll. Cuming. Size: 32 lin. (= 72.0mm). Holotype no. 1968229: 67.6mm; syntype: 63.0 mm. lepida, Terebra — Hinps, 1844, P. Z. S. L., p. 158. Hab. Guinea. Coll. Cuming. Size: 10 lin. (= 224 mm). Holotype: 23.0mm; syntypes: 244mm, and 21.9 mm. = Hastula strigilata (LinnaEus, 1758). ligata, Terebra — Hinps, 1844, P. Z. S. L., p. 153. Hab. Marquesas. Coll. E. Belcher. Size: 154 lin. (= 34.9mm). Probable holotype: 31.1mm (juv. specimen). lightfooti, Terebra (Abretia) — E. A. Smiru, 1899, J Geo 24 7p plts op atie- alae labaalablem ban, (Lightfoot). Coll. J. H. Ponsonby. Size: 194 <6 mm. Holotype no. 99.9.9.2: 19.5 mm. ligneola, Terebra — REEve, 1860, Conch. Icon., plt. 7, spec. 25 (nom. nov. pro T: castanea Hinps, 1844 Vol. 11; No. 3 THE VELIGER Page 217 123. He 125. 126. Di 128. 129. 130. UBil. 132. —non Krener, 1838). Hab. China; Fortune. Coll. Cuming. Size of figure: 63.2 mm. Holotype: 63.0 mm; syntypes: 62.4 mm, and 57.2mm. = T: badia Desuayes, 1859. lima, Terebra -DEsuayes, 1857, J. C. P, 6: 69, plt. 4, fig. 2. Hab. les mers de Chine. Size: 7811 mm. Holotype: 764 mm. lingualis, Terebra — Hinps, 1844, P. Z. S. L., p. 153. Hab. Gulf of Papagayo, Bay of Montejo, west coast of America. Coll. Cuming. Size: 30 lin. (= 674mm). Holotype no.1968232: 68.1 mm; syntypes: 73.3 mm, and 57.2 mm. The specimen figured by CAMPBELL (1962) as the “type” of T: lingualis was the 73.3 mm syntype. livida, Terebra — REEVE, 1860, Conch. Icon., plt. 22, spec. 116. Hab. Philippine Islands. Coll. Taylor. Size of figure: 41.8mm. Holotype no. 74.12.11.299: 38.4 mm. loisae, Terebra — E. A. SmituH, 1903, P. M. S. L., 5: 360, plt. 15, fig. 1. Hab. Umkomaas, Natal (Burnup). Coll. J. H. Ponsonby. Size: 306mm. Holotype no. 1901.9.22.81: 28.4mm; there are another 2 specimens present in the type collection which are not type material. longiscata, Terebra — DesuHAYES, 1859, P. Z. S. L., p. 294. Hab. Les Isles Philippines. Coll. Cuming. Size: 299 mm. There is one specimen in the type collec- tion which is most probably the holotype and meas- ures 24.4><4.8 mm. Deshayes’ stated dimensions are obviously an error, since the given width in relation to the total length is out of proportion for such a slender species of Terebra. luctuosa, Terebra — Hinps, 1844, P. Z. S. L., p. 157. Hab. Gulf of Nicoya, Puerto Portrero, west coast of America. Coll. Cuming and Belcher. Size: 17 lin. (= 38.3 mm). Holotype no. 1968246: 38.4 mm; syn- types: 40.6mm, and 33.0mm. The types are not smooth, but have fine slender axial ribs. lutescens, Terebra — E. A. Smiru, 1873, A. M.N. H., 11: 264 (nom. nov. pro T: flava Gray, 1834). For types see under Terebra flava Gray, 1834. macandrewi, Terebra (Myurella) — E. A. Smitu, 1877, A. M. N. H.,19: 228. Hab. Persian Gulf (Colo- nel Pelly). Coll. R. MacAndrew. Size: 1344 mm. Holotype no. 73.7.5.5: 13.4mm (spot of red wax on whorl above aperture) ; syntype: 11.2 mm. macgillivrayi, Myurella — E. A. Smiru, 1873, A. M. N. H., 11: 267. Hab. Brunei Island, south coast of New Guinea (J. MacGillivray, H. M. S. Rattle- snake). Size: 225mm. Holotype no. 56.12.8.93: 21.8 mm. mamillata, Terebra (Myurella) — Watson, 1886, 133. 134. 135% 136. IS 138. 140. 141. Voy. Challenger, Zool., 15: 381, plt. 16, fig. 1. Hab. Station 204A or B, Philippines. Size: 1.35><0.25 inches (= 34.3 mm). Holotype no. 87.2.9.1159: 33.7 mm; paratype no. 87.2.9.1160: 29.6 mm, marginata, Terebra — Desuayes. 1857, J. C. P, 6: 86, plt. 4, fig. 8. Hab. L’embouchure de la Gambie. Coll. Cuming. Size: 348 mm. Holotype: 34.0 mm (marked x inside aperture) ; syntype: 29.6 mm. The locality indication of Gambia appears to be errone- ous, since the types are coarsely sculptured T. armil- lata Hinps, 1844. mariesi, Terebra — E.. A. Situ, 1880, P. Z. S. L., p. 480, plt. 48, fig. 5. Hab. Japan (Mr. Maries). Size: 457 mm. Holotype no. 1880.3.1.94: 43.0 mm (spot of red wax on whorl above aperture) ; syntype: 40.6 mm. marmorata, Terebra — DesHayes, 1859, P. Z. S. L., p. 279. Hab. Moreton Bay (there is also a label present bearing the locality “Port Curtis, ex Stutch- bury”). Coll. Cuming. Size: 418 mm. Holotype: 4034 mm. melanacme, Terebra — E. A. Smiru, 1875, A. M.N. H., 15: 415, and 1877, A. M. N. H., 19: 224. Hab. Cape Sima, Japan (Commander St. John). Coll. J. G. Jeffreys. Size: 174mm (juvenile specimen). Holotype no. 73.8.6.11: 17.8mm (spot of red wax on second whorl above aperture). There are two other specimens in the type collection, no. 1900.2.13. 58.7: 23.2 mm, and 11.8 mm, which are later addi- tions since SmirH (1877) had only 1 juvenile speci- men on hand at the time of description. micans, Terebra — Hinps, 1844, P. Z. S. L., p. 157. Hab. ? (“Cape Palmas, West Africa” on label). Coll. Cuming. Size: 13 lin. (= 29.3mm). Holotype no. 1968248: 30.4mm; syntypes: 23.1 mm, and 21.8mm. miranda, Myurella — E. A. Smitu, 1873, A. M.N. H., 11: 267. Hab. Malacca. Coll. Cuming. Holotype: 24.7 mm; syntype: 20.8 mm. The locality is suspect, since the types appear to be faded specimens of the West American radula-aspera group of species. 9. modesta, Terebra — DEsSHAYES, 1859, P. Z. S. L., p. 288. Hab. L’embouchure de l’Indus. Coll. Cuming. Size: 224mm. Holotype: 21.6 mm; syntype: 20.6 mm (on label is written “== T: matheroniana DEs- HAYES, 1859). morbida, Terebra — Rerve, 1860, Conch. Icon., plt. 24, spec. 133. Hab. ? Coll. Taylor. Size of figure: 13.8mm. Holotype no. 79.2.26.25: 14.1 mm. nana, Terebra — DesuayeEs, 1859, P Z.S.L., p. 291. Hab. L’embouchure de l’Indus. Coll. Cuming. Size: 1024 mm. Holotype: 9.9 mm. Page 218 1 143. 144. 145, 146. WAT): 148. 149, 150. 151. —_— 152. nassoides, Terebra — Hinps, 1844, P. Z. S. L., p. 158. Hab. ? Coll. Cuming. Size: 6 lin. (= 13.5 mm). Lectotype no. 1968251: 13.8mm; syntypes: 15.5 mm, and 13.9 mm. This appears to be the same spe- cies as T: bridgest Dat, 1908. nimbosa, Terebra — Hinps, 1844, P. Z.S.L., p. 151. Hab. ? Coll. Cuming. Size: 25 lin. (= 56.3 mm). Lectotype: 58.8 mm; syntypes: 64.9mm, and 58.7 mm (worn and faded), and 52.66mm. = Hastula hectica (LinnaEus, 1758). nitida, Terebra — Hinps, 1844, P. Z. S. L., p. 152. Hab. Marquesas. Coll. Belcher. Size: 10 lin. (= 224 mm). Holotype no. 1844.6.7.85: 20.5 mm. nodularis, Terebra — DEsHAYES, 1859, P. Z.S.L., p. 295. Hab. Les Isles Sandwich. Coll. Cuming & Des- hayes (“ex Pease” on label). Size: 356 mm. Holo- type: 346 mm; syntypes: 37.1 mm, and 33.0 mm. obesa, Terebra — Hinps, 1844, P Z. S. L., p. 158. Hab. ? Coll. Cuming; unique! Size: 6 lin. (= 13.5 mm). Holotype no. 1968250: 13.6 mm. The labrum of the aperture is lirate in the type. pallida, Terebra — Desuayes, 1857, J. C. P, 6: 87, plt. 4, fig. 3. Hab. Les isles Marquises. Coll. Cuming. Size: 72<11mm. Holotype: 71.8mm; syntypes: 59.2 mm (erroneously marked with x inside aper- ture), and 51.9mm. The holotype is the same spe- cies as T’ punctatostriata Gray, 1834; the two smaller syntypes are T: cingulifera LAMarckK, 1822. parva, Terebra (Leiostoma) Bairp in BRENCHLEY, 1873, Cruise H. M. S. Curacao, p. 435, plt. 37, figs. 5, 6. Hab. New Caledonia. Size: 8-11 lin. & 2 lin. (= 18-24.8mm 4.5 mm). Lectotype no. 56: 22.8 mm (marked with an x on the tablet near the apex of the shell) ; paralectotype no. 65: 18.4 mm. paucistriata, Myurella — E. A. Smirn, 1873, A. M. N. H., 11: 269. Hab. Ovalau, Fiji Islands (J. Mac- Gillivray, H. M. S. Rattlesnake). Size: 19x4 mm. Holotype no. 1856.11.3.17: 18.6 mm. peasu, Terebra — Desuayes, 1859, P. Z. S. L., p. 302. Hab. Les Iles Sandwich (“ex Pease” on label). Size: 45 <9 mm. Holotype: 45.6 mm. pellyi, Terebra — E. A. Smitu, 1877, A. M. N. H., 19: 226. Hab. Persian Gulf (Colonel Pelly). Coll. R. MacAndrew. Size: 133 mm. Holotype no. 73.7. 5.1: 12.4 mm (spot of red wax on whorl above aper- ture and marked with x under specimen on tablet). There are additionally 7 syntypes in the type collec- tion, all smaller than the holotype. penicillata, Terebra — Hinps, 1844, P. Z. S. L., p. 157. Hab. Seychelles. Coll. Belcher & Cuming (“ex Rousseau” on label). Size: 17 lin. (= 38.3 mm). Holotype no. 1968244: 40.0 mm; syntypes: 34.4 mm, and 26.4 mm. THE VELIGER 153. WS), 155. 156. Hore 158. 159. 160. 161. 162. 163. Vol. 11; No. 3 persica, Terebra — E. A. Smitu, 1877, A. M. N. H., 19: 225. Hab. Persian Gulf (Colonel Pelly). Coll. R. MacAndrew. Size: 123mm. Holotype no. 73.7. 5.4: 11.4mm; syntypes: 10.0 mm, 9.0mm, and 8.1 mm. petiveriana, Terebra — DesHayeEs, 1857, J. C. P, 6: 85, plt. 5, fig. 10. Hab. Panama. Coll. Cuming. Size: 4210 mm. Holotype: 43.0 mm (marked with x in- side aperture); syntype: 409mm. = T: radula Hinps, 1844. philippiana, Terebra — DesHayEs, 1859, P. Z. S. L., p. 289. Hab. isles Marquises? Size: 824mm. Lec- totype: 9.3 mm. Two specimens have been previous- ly attached to the tablet on either side of the lecto- type, but these are missing now. == Hastula albula (MENKE, 1843). polygonia, Terebra — Reeve, 1860, Conch. Icon., plt. 27, spec. 154. Hab. ? Coll. Taylor. Size of figure: 10.6mm. Holotype no. 74.12.11.302: 10.7 mm. polygyrata, Terebra — DesHAYES, 1859, P. Z. S. L., p. 301. Hab. Les fles Philippines. Coll. Cuming. Size: 133mm. Holotype: 12.6 mm. praclonga, Terebra — DEsSHAYES, 1859, P. Z. S. L., p. 315. Hab. Port Curtis. Coll. Cuming. Size: 939 mm. Holotype: 92.4mm; syntype: 102.6mm (er- roneously selected as the “type” in the collection). = T. triseriata Gray, 1834. pretiosa, Terebra — ReEve, 1842, P. Z. S. L., p. 200 & 1842, Conch. Syst., 2: plt. 274, fig. 2. Hab. ? (“China” on label). Coll. Stainforth. Size: 59/16 + poll. (= 141.317.4 mm). Obtained by Cum- ing; unique! Holotype: 140 mm; another specimen, 136.6mm long, is present in the type collection which is not a type, as the specimen was said to be unique at the time of description. pulchella, Terebra — Desuayes, 1857, J. C. P, 6: 94, plt. 5, fig. 4 (non Epitonium pulchellum Noopt, 1819). Hab. les mers de la Chine. Coll. Cuming. Size: 40 <8 mm. Holotype: 39.2 mm; syntype: 41.2 mm (erroneously marked x inside aperture). pulchra, Terebra — Hinps, 1844, P. Z. S. L., p. 151. Hab. Marquesas. Coll. Belcher. Size: 11 lin. (= 24.7 mm). Holotype: 24.7/mm. = T. cerithina La- MARCK, 1822 (juvenile specimen). punctatostriata, Terebra — Gray, 1834, P.Z.S.L., p. 61. Hab. ? Coll. J. E. Gray. Size: 22” (= 69.9 mm). Holotype no, 74.11.10.1: 70.2mm. This species is not conspecific with T. cingulifera Lamarck, 1822, but is an earlier name for T: pallida Desuayes, 1857. pura, Terebra — Desuayss, 1857, J. C. P, 6: 82, plt. 5, fig. 8. Hab. Zanzibar. Coll. Cuming. Size: Not given in 1857; (69>11mm in 1859). Holotype: 64.7 mm (marked x inside aperture, also on whorl Vol. 11; No. 3 above aperture and near apex of the shell on the tablet). Syntypes: 51.5 mm, and 45.8 mm. . pustulosa, Terebra — E. A. Smiru, 1879, P. Z. S. L., p. 186 (nom. nov. pro T. granulosa E. A. Situ, 1873 — non Lamarck, 1822). For types see under T. granulosa E. A. Smitu. . radula, Terebra — Hinps, 1844, P. Z. S. L., p. 155 (non GraveNnHorsT, 1807). Hab. Puerto Potrero, west coast of America. Coll. Cuming. Size: 19 lin. (= 42.7mm). Holotype no. 1968236: 40.8 mm. = T. panamensis Dati, 1908 (fide CAMPBELL in Keen, 1968), but 7: glauca Hinps, 1844 is a small specimen of T: radula. Terebra aspera Hinps, 1844, is not T. variegata Gray, 1834, as suggested by KEEN (1968), but is rather similar to T: radula; it differs in having 3 prominent spiral rows of coarse nodules on each whorl which do not have the tendency to form axial ribs; this, however, may be a variable factor. . reevei, Terebra — DesHayeEs, 1857, J. C. P, 6: 88, plt. 4, fig. 14. Hab. les iles Moluques. Coll. Cuming. Size: 5211 mm (9211 m min 1859). Holotype: 50.9 mm; syntypes: 50.0 mm, and 45.5 mm. = Duplicaria duplicata (Linnarus, 1758). . regina, Terebra — Desuayes, 1857, J. C. P, 6: 67, plt. 3, fig. 7. Hab. le Sénégal (“Loanda” on label). Coll. Cuming. Size: 78*13mm (8913 mm in 1859). Holotype: 76.3mm. = T? corrugata, La- MARCK, 1822. . remanalva, Terebra — Me viii, 1910, A. M. N. H., 6: 12, plt. 2, fig. 21. Hab. Persian Gulf, Bundo Ab- bas and Bushire. Size: 31><7 mm. Holotype no. 1911.6.21.11: 33.8 mm (marked x inside aperture) ; paratype no. 1911.6.21.12: 229mm. = a worn and faded T: spectabilis Hinps, 1844? . robusta, Terebra — Hinps, 1844, P. Z.S. L., p. 149. Hab. Panama, Gulf of Nicoya, Gulf of Papagayo and San Blas, west coast of America. Coll. Belcher & Cuming. Size: 57 lin. (= 128.2 mm). Lectotype no. 1968171: 117.4mm; syntypes: 136.7 mm, and 88.0 mm. . roseata, Terebra — ADAMS & REEVE, 1850, Voy. Sam- arang, Zool., p. 30, plt. 10, fig. 24. Hab. Sooloo Is- lands. Size of figure: 29.5 mm. Holotype: 29.2 mm; GES VELIGER — Page 219 variegata Gray, 1834. . rufopunctata, Terebra (Hastula) — E. A. Smitu, 1877, A. M.N. H., 19: 229. Hab. ? Coll. J. E. Gray. Size: 225 mm. Holotype no. 74.10.12.3: 21.6 mm (spot of red wax on whorl above aperture) ; syntypes: 19.9mm, 19.6mm, and 17.4 mm. = Hastula trailli (DesHayEs, 1859). . Sallaeana, Terebra — Desuayes, 1859, P. Z. S. L., p. 287. Hab. Mexico (Sallé). Coll. Cuming. Size: 245mm. Holotype: 2355 mm; syntypes: 25.3 mm, and 23.2mm. = Hastula cinerea (Born, 1778). . serotina, Terebra — AvdAMS & Reeve, 1850, Voy. Samarang, Zool., p. 30, plt. 10, fig. 20. Hab. Japan Island, Nagasaki Bay (“ Isle of Luzon” on label). Size of figure: 45.0mm. Holotype: 48.3 mm; syn- types: 55.8mm, and 52.2mm. The syntypes may possibly be later additions from the Philippines. = T. anilis (R6ptnc, 1798). . severa, Terebra — MEtvitt, 1897, M. P M. L. B.S., 41 (7): 9, plt. 6, fig. 8. Hab. Mekran coast. Size: 143.4 mm. Holotype no. 97.7.30.103: 14.8 mm. . sicyodes, Terebra nitida var. — MELVILL & SYKES, 1898, P. M.S. L., 3:.43, plt. 3, fig. 8. Hab. Andaman Islands. Size: 37><6mm. Holotype no. 98.4.30.4: 35.0mm. = T! nitida Hinps, 1844. . similis, Terebra — F.. A. Smitu, 1873, A. M. N. H., 11: 265. Hab. ? (“Madras” on label). Coll. Cuming. Size: 226mm. Questionable holotype: 27.4 mm. (== “T. concolor E. A. Smirn” on label). . solida, Terebra — Desuayes, 1857, J. C. P, 6: 78, pit. 3, fig. 11. Hab. le Japon. Coll. Cuming. Size: 308mm. Holotype: 29.9 mm. . sowerbyana, Terebra — Desuayes, 1857, J. C. P, 6: 93, plt. 3, fig. 8. Hab. la mer de Gambie (“River Gambia, Mr. Deal” on label). Coll. Cuming. Size: Not given in 1857, 5612 mm in 1859. Holotype: 56.3 mm. . Specillata, Tercbra — Hinps, 1844, P.Z.S.L., p. 155. Hab. San Blas (“San Blas, Mexico” on label). Coll. Belcher. Size: 20 lin. (== 45.0mm). The only speci- men present in the type collection is a Cuming speci- men no. 1844.6.7.84: 39.3 mm, and is most prob- ably a paratype. syntypes: 25.2 mm, 21.0 mm; 20.0 mm, and 6.8 mm 182. speciosa, Terebra — Desnayes, 1859, P. Z. S. L., p. (juvenile specimen). 279 (non BEAN in TuHorPeE, 1844). Hab. ? (“West 171. rudis, Terebra — Gray, 1834, P Z. S. L., p. 60. Africa” on label). Coll. Cuming & Deshayes. Size: Hab. ? Coll. J. E. Gray. Size: 14” (= 38.1 mm). 397 mm. Holotype: 39.8X7.6mm. = T. sene- Holotype no. 74.11.10.11: 36.8mm. = T. dislocata galensis LAMARCK, 1822. Say, 1822. 183. spectabilis, Terebra — Hinps, 1844, P. Z. S. L., p. 172. rufocinerea, Terebra (Myurella) — CARPENTER, 1857 150. Hab. Guinea and Sumatra. Coll. Cuming (“ex = Gee Iasi, IGOR, jo, 4243, poll, SS, ie, fo, = IE E. Layard” on label). Size: 134 lin. (= 30.4 mm). Page 220 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 184. 185. 186. 187. 188. 189. 190. 191. — 192. 193. Questionable syntypes: 49.7 mm, 38.0 mm, and 35.8 mm. (“= T. gracilis Gray, 1834” on label). straminea, Terebra — Gray, 1834, P. Z.S. L., p. 62. Hab. ? Coll. J. E. Gray. Size: 23” (= 63.5 mm). Holotype: 63.0mm (marked x inside aperture). There are another 2 larger specimens in the type collection ex coll. Cuming from the Philippine Is- lands, which are not type material. = worn and faded T. anilis (Rop1nc, 1798). striata, Terebra — Gray, 1834, P. Z.S. L., p. 60 (non Basterot, 1825; nec Quoy « Garmarp, 1833). Hab. ? Coll. J. E. Gray. Size: 14” (= 38.1 mm). Holo- type no. 74.10.11.3: 35.0 mm (juvenile specimen). = T. babylonia Lamarck, 1822. stylata, Terebra — Hinps, 1844, P. Z. S. L., p. 152. Hab. Japan, Philippine Islands (“Cagayan, Island of Mindanao” on label). Coll. Cuming. Size: 21 lin. (= 47.3mm). Holotype no. 1968230: 48.8 mm; syntypes: 49.3mm, and 38.0 mm. subnodosa, Terebra (Myurella) — CarPENTER, 1857 — see KEEN, 1968, p. 428, plt. 58, fig. 72, = T. intertincta Hinps, 1844. subtextilis, Terebra — E. A. Smiru, 1879, P. Z. S. L., p. 185, plt. 19, fig. 3. Hab. Station 21; Japan. Coll. J. G. Jeffreys. Size: 376mm. Holotype no. 78.10. 16.28: 35.0mm. = T! textilis Hinps, 1844. succinea, Terebra — Hinps, 1844, P. Z. S. L., p. 149. Hab. ? Coll. Cuming. Size: 54 lin. (= 121.5 mm). Probable holotype no. 1968172: 113.5 mm (marked x inside aperture); syntypes: 100.6mm, and 78.8 mm (juvenile specimen). sumatrana, Terebra strigilata — THIELE, 1925, Wiss. Erg. Deut. Tief. Exp. Valdivia, 17: 344, plt. 29, fig. 20. Hab. Sumatra. Ex coll. Berlin Museum. Paratypes no. 1948.12.10.3-4: 18.7 mm, and 12.8 mm. = Hastula strigilata (LInNAEUs, 1758). suspensa, Terebra — EK. A. Situ, 1904, Journ. Ma- lac. 11: 30, plt. 2, fig. 12. Hab. Port Elizabeth (“‘Pt. Alfred, Cape Colony; ex Turton” on label). Size: 204.5 mm. Holotype no. 90.3.12.19.858: 19.8 mm. Syntypes no. 90.3.12.19.859-862: 18.0 mm, 17.5 mm, 16.3 mm, and 16.1 mm. swainsoni, Terebra — DESHAYES, 1859, P. Z. S. L., p. 299. Hab. Les Isles Sandwich. Coll. Cuming (“ex Pease” on label). Size: 305 mm. Holotype: 30.0 6.0 mm; syntypes: 30.2 mm, and 26.5 mm. tantilla, Myurella — E. A. Smitu, 1873, A. M. N. H., 11: 270. Hab. Japan (A. Adams). Coll. Cuming. Size: 63>2$mm. Holotype no. 73.7.5.2: 7.5mm (marked with an x above the apex of the shell on the tablet). There are another 3 specimens in the type collection, ex coll. R. MacAndrew, mounted on the 194. NE, 196. 197, 198. IS), 200. 201. — 202. 203. same tablet on the extreme right, but these are not type material. taylort, Terebra — Reeve, 1860, Conch. Icon., plt. 23, spec. 124. Hab. Torres Strait, Australia. Coll. Taylor. Size of figure: 27.2 mm (? enlarged). Prob- able holotype no. 74.12.11.300: 19.3 mm. tenera, Terebra — Hinps, 1844, P Z. S. L., p. 158. Hab. Straits of Malacca; Ceylon. Coll. Belcher. Size: 4 lin. (= 9.0 mm). Three syntypes present in- stead of two, no. 44.6.7.86-67: 6.2 mm, 5.9 mm, and 5.8 mm; one of the three specimens is not a type. textilis, Terebra — Hinps, 1844, P. Z. S. L., p. 156. Hab. Sorsogon, Bay of Manila, Philippines; Straits of Macassar. Coll. Cuming & Belcher. Size: 114 lin. (= 25.9mm). Holotype: 25.7 mm (spot of red wax on whorl above aperture and x marked inside aperture) ; syntypes: 22.4mm, and 22.3mm. An- other 15.2 mm specimen ex coll. Belcher is a different species. thyraea, Terebra (Euryta) — Me.vi.i, 1897, M. P. L. P.S., 41 (7): 10, plt. 6, fig. 13. Hab. Karachi and Mekran coasts. Size: 124 mm. Holotype no. 97.7. 30.89: 11.9 mm. tiarella, Terebra — DEsHaAYES, 1857, J. C. P, 6: 91, plt. 5, fig. 7. Hab. Natal. Coll. Cuming. Size: 328 mm. Holotype: 31.6mm; syntype: 31.1mm. The locality indication is erroneous, as the types appear to be conspecific with T: fitchi Berry, 1958. torquata, Terebra — ADAMS & REEVE, 1850, Voy. Samarang, Zool., p. 30, plt. 10, fig. 13. Hab. China Sea (“Nagasaki Bay, Japan” on label). Coll. Cum- ing. Size of figure: 45.0mm. Holotype: 45.5 mm; syntype: 52.1 mm. There are another 2 specimens in the type collection, 34.1 mm, and 22.9 mm in length, ex coll. J. G. Jeffreys, which are probably later ad- ditions; the locality of “Japan” on the label prob- ably applies to the Jeffreys specimens. traillu, Terebra — DEesHayes, 1859, P. Z. S. L., p. 285. Hab. Vasigapatam, Océan Indien (“Madras Presidency, India” on label). Coll. Cuming. Size: 2343 mm. Lectotype: 23.84.6 mm; syntypes: 24.9 mm, 24.2 mm, and 22.4 mm. tricincta, Terebra — E. A. Smiru, 1877, A. M.N. H., 19: 225. Hab. Persian Gulf (Colonel Pelly). Coll. R. MacAndrew. Size: 1123mm. Holotype no. 73.7.5.6: 10.9 mm; syntype: 10.8 mm. triseriata, Terebra — Gray, 1834, P. Z. S. L., p. 62. Hab. ? Size: 12’ (= 44.5 mm). Holotype no. 74.9. 9.1: 46.7 mm. trismacaria, Terebra — MEtviLu, 1917, J. C. L., 15: 188, text fig. Hab. Mekran coast, probably off Char- bar. Size: 184mm. Holotype no. 1925.3.12.14: Vol. 11; No. 3 THE VELIGER Page 221 170mm. = T. polygyrata DesHayeEs, 1859. CAMPBELL in KEEN, 1968), but T: larvaeformis 204. tristis, Terebra — DESHAYES, 1859, P. Z.S. L., p. 306. Hinps, 1844 is the same species. 205. 206. 207. 208. 209. 210. Hab. les mers du Japon (= error! the species occurs in New Zealand waters). Coll. Cuming. Size: 199 mm. Holotype: 17.7 mm; another specimen, 14.8 mm in length, is a J. E. Gray specimen. Deshayes’ stated width of 9 mm is obviously an error for 6mm. trochlea, Terebra — DesHayeEs, 1857, J. C. P, 6: 89, plt. 5, fig. 6. Hab. Zanzibar. Coll. Cuming. Size: 6513 mm (6913 mm in 1859). Holotype: 65.3 mm (marked x inside aperture) ; syntype: 50.5 mm (juvenile specimen). tuberculosa, Terebra — Hinps, 1844, P. Z. S. L., p. 154. Hab. Panama, Gulf of Papagayo and San Blas. Coll. Belcher. Size: 24 lin. (= 54.0 mm). Holotype no. 1844.6.7.82: 55.7 mm (marked x inside aperture) ; syntypes (ex coll. Cuming, Panama): 46.4 mm, and 42.6mm. The holotype of T: tuberculosa is not like the shell figured for the species by CAMPBELL (1964) on plt. 17, fig. 7, but rather similar to T. cracilenta Li, 1930, as figured by the same author on plt. 17, fig. 9. The penultimate whorl has 4 spiral rows of small nodules and the body whorl 7 rows up to the peripheral ridge. turrita, Myurella — E. A. Smiru, 1873, A. M.N. H., 11: 266. Hab. Torres Strait. Coll. Cuming. Size: 26 44 mm. Holotype: 23.0mm. = T: exigua Des- HAYES, 1859. undulata, Terebra — Gray, 1834, P. Z. S. L., p. 60. Habs Size; 13/7 (= 38mm); Coll, J, Ey Gray. Lectotype no. 74.11.10.5: 33.6mm; syntypes: 33.3 mm, and 32.7 mm. ustulata, Terebra — DesHayeEs, 1857, J. C. P, 6: 97, plt. 3, fig. 12. Hab. la Terre de Van Diemen. Coll. Cuming. Size: 3510mm. Holotype: 35.0 10.7 mm (marked x inside aperture) ; syntypes: 36.9 mm, and 31.3 mm. There are another 3 specimens in the type collection which are not type material but have been purchased at a later date. varicosa, Terebra — Hinps, 1844, P. Z. S. L., p. 152 (non Buccinum varicosum GMELIN, 1791; nec Tereb- ra varicosa Bosc, 1801). Hab. Gulf of Papagayo, west coast of Central America. Coll. Belcher. Size: 11 lin. (= 248mm). Holotype no. 1844.6.7.88: 25.0 mm; questionable Cuming syntype: 19.8 mm. It is suspected that sometime during labelling the smaller Cuming specimen has been interchanged with the larger Belcher specimen; from the dimen- sions supplied by Hinps, it is evident that the larger holotype originated from the Belcher collection. = T. brunneocincta Pirspry & Lowe, 1932 (fide 211. variegata, Terebra — Gray, 1834, P. Z. S. L., p. 61. Hab. ? Coll. J. E. Gray. Size: 24” (= 63.5 mm). Holotype: 61.4mm (marked x inside aperture). There are 2 other specimens in the type collection (“Guaymas, Gulf of California, ex Mr. Babb?” on label) 78.0mm and 61.7 mm in length, which are later additions and not type material. venilia, Terebra — TENtISoN-Woops, 1880, Proc. Timn. Soc. N.S. W,.4: 23, plt. 4; figs! 2) 2a: Hab: Sow and Pigs reef, Port Jackson. Size: 4274 mm. Holotype no. 96.11.30.28: 41.1 mm. venosa, Terebra — Hinps, 1844, P. Z. S. L., p. 157. Hab. ? Coll. Cuming. Size: 16 lin. (= 36.0mm). Holotype no. 1968245: 35.0 mm; syntypes: 34.9 mm and 27.0 mm. = Hastula penicillata (Hinps, 1844). virginea, Terebra — DESHAYES, 1857, J. C. P, 6: 83, pit. 4, fig. 12. Hab. Zanzibar. Coll. Cuming. Size: 5211mm. Holotype: 52.3 mm. —= worn and faded T: consors Hinps, 1844. walkeri, Terebra — E. A. Smiru, 1899, P. M. S. L., 3: 312, fig. 1. Hab. Holothuria Banks, North-West Australia; J. J. Walker. Size: 266mm. Holotype no. 91.11.21.326: 26.2 mm (juvenile specimen). wilkinsi, Strioterebrum (Partecosta) — DANCE & Eames, 1966, P. M.S. L., 37: 42, plt. 3, fig. 4 & pit. 5, fig. 5. Hab. Fao, Persian Gulf. Coll. W. D. Cum- ming. Size: 9.22.8 mm. Holotype no. 1893.12.15. 74: 9.2 mm; plus 6 paratypes nos. 1893.12.15.75-80. = Terebra fuscobasis E. A. Smitu, 1877. Tomutn (1944) did not locate the type specimens of the following species: Terebra archimedis Desuayes, T: buccinulum Desuayes and T: lactea DESHAYEs; these types were in the type collection when I examined them. However, I did not find the type of T: histrio DESHAYES, 1857, which Tomuin (loc. cit.) reported as being in Cuming’s collection. For 14 species Tomutn reported a single type in each case but I found 2 or more syntypes present in the type collection. It is obvious that in the short span of time since ToMLIN reported on DEesHAyeEs’ Terebra types, the type collection has undergone changes, and more types are now present in the type collection than there were in 1944. It is probable that additional types have been isolated and removed from the general collection. Apart from bona fide holotypes and lectotypes, remaining syn- types are E. A. Smith’s, Melvill, and Melvill and Sykes material excluded, rather questionable paratype material. PAE 213. Blab, “Alle 216. Page 222 LITERATURE CITED CAMPBELL, G. BRUCE 1963. Rediscovery of Terebra formosa DrsHayes, 1857. The Veliger 5 (3): 101-103; plts. 12, 13. (1 January 1963) 1964. | New terebrid species from the eastern Pacific (Mollusca: Gastropoda). The Veliger 6 (3): 132-138; plt. 17 (1 January 1964) DEsHAYES, GERARD PAUL 1857. Descriptions d’espéces nouvelles du genr: Terebra. Journ. de Conchyl. 6: 65 - 102; plts. 3-5 1859. A general review of the genus Jerebra, and a description Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 270 - 321 of new species. 5 pits. Gray, JoHN Epwarp 1854. | Untitled. [Terebra] _ Proc. Zool. Soc. London, Part II (1834) : 50 - 63 (50 - 56: 26 Sept.; 57-63: 25 Nov. 1834) Hinps, Ricrarp BrRINSLEY 1844. | Description of new shells, collected during the voyage of the Sulphur, and in Mr. Cuming’s late visit to the Philip- pines. Proc. Zool. Soc. London for 1843, pt. 11: 149 - 168 (June 1844) THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 Keen, A. Myra 1958. Sea shells of tropical West America; marine mollusks from Lower California to Colombia. i- xi + 624 pp.; illus. Stanford, Calif. (Stanford Univ. Press) 1966. | West American mollusk types in the British Museum (Natural History), II. Species described by R. B, Hinps. The Veliger 8 (4) : 265 - 275; plts. 46, 47; 6 text figs. (1 April 1966) 1968. West American mollusk types at the British Museum (Natural History). - IV. Carpenter's Mazatlan collection. The Veliger 10 (4): 389-439; plts. 55-59; 171 text figs. (1 April 1968) REEvE, LovELL AuGcustus 1860. | Conchologia Iconica. Monograph of the genus Terebra. 13: plts. 1-27 (May - June 1860) SmitH, Epcar ALBERT 1873. | Remarks on a few species belonging to the family Tere- bridae, and descriptions of several new forms in the collection of the British Museum. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., (ser. 4), 11: 262 - 271 1877. Descriptions of new species of Conidae and Terebridae. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., (ser. 4), 19: 222 - 231 ToMuin, Joun Reap LE BrockroNn 1944. Deshayes’ review of Terebra. 104 - 108 Journ. Conch. 22 (5): (30 November 1944) Vol. 11; No. 3 THE VELIGER Page 223 The Ecology of Macoma inconspicua (Broprrip & SOWERBY, 1829) in Central San Francisco Bay. Part I. The Vertical Distribution of the Macoma Community BY MARILYN T: VASSALLO Department of Biological Sciences California State College at Hayward, Hayward, California 94542 ' (Plate 44; 6 Text figures; 2 Tables) INTRODUCTION THE PRESENT STuDy of the distribution of Macoma inconspicua (BRODERIP & SOWERBY, 1829) (== Macoma balthica LinNAEus, 1758) community of central San Francisco Bay is of significance as no systematic subtidal or intertidal studies have been made in the expanse of shallow water (less than 5m in depth) covering 48% of the central bay. The purpose of this research was fourfold: (1) to delineate the vertical distribution of the fauna, (2) to describe the physical structure of the community within the mud, (3) to observe the interactions among the in- vertebrate fauna, and (4) to compare this community to parallel communities investigated by other authors. The second aspect of the study will be discussed in a later paper. In this paper the name Macoma inconspicua is treated synonymously with M. balthica as in previous studies on this species in the San Francisco Bay region. LOCATION or tHe STUDY San Francisco Bay is located in the central portion of California. For purpose of discussion, it is convenient to divide San Francisco Bay into 3 sections: northern, cent- ral and southern. Because the United States Coast and ' Present address: Department of Biological Sciences, University of Victoria, Victoria, B. C., Canada Geodetic Survey does not recognize these divisions, pre- vious authors have used conflicting boundaries. Although the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey has not defined north, central, and south San Francisco Bay as such, its charting system divides the northern region from the central portion in maps 5531 and 5532. Central San Francisco Bay is here defined as bounded on the north by a line extending from Hunters Point to Bay Farm Island and on the south by the San Mateo Bridge. These boundaries were used by Gram (1966) in his compre- hensive study of the marine geology of central San Francisco Bay. Benthic samples analyzed in this study were taken from an intertidal mud flat bordering the ponds of the Oliver Brothers’ Salt Company on the east side of central San Francisco Bay one half mile north of the San Mateo Bridge (Text figure 1). PREVIOUS ECOLOGICAL STUDIES Previous ecological studies have, for the most part, been restricted to subtidal work by investigators who oper- ated a dredge from a large boat or ship. The U.S.S. “Albatross”, commissioned by the U.S. Bureau of Fish- eries to make a biological survey, cruised San Francisco Bay from January 1912 to April 1913 (Packarp, 1918a). A report of the physical conditions from Suisun Bay to San Mateo Point based on data taken during this cruise was made by SuMNER et al. in 1914. This work was preceded by the limited geological investigations made Page 224 from the Russian ship “Rurik” in 1816 (in Gram, 1966) and the biological investigations of H. M.S. “Blossom” in 1826 (RosEwatTEeR, 1968). The report by SuMNeER et al. (1914) was the basis of ecological studies made on the molluscan fauna by E. L. Packarp. His first report was a qualitative study based on the fauna obtained from “several common types of dredges” (1918a). The second study was quantitative based on material taken with an orange peel dredge, the first time such a dredge was used in biological studies (Packarp, 1918b). Another early investigation of the physical factors of the bay was that of Miter et al. in 1928. Extensive work in the northern part of the bay has been carried out by Fruice (1954a, 1954b, 1958) and M. L. Jones (1961). In his work on the distribution of in- vertebrates in the northern bay Finice used both Ekman and Petersen dredges. Jones collected his samples off Point Richmond with a core sampler. An investigation of water sediment quality and pollu- tional characteristics of the bay was made by McCarty (1962). This study was followed by a faunal study in which samples were taken with an orange peel dredge in the north and central bay (Storrs et al., 1965). Most recently, samples from 6 stations in the north and central bay were taken, again with an orange peel dredge, by Apuin (1967). PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE ENVIRONMENT TIDES: On the Pacific coast two high tides of unequal magni- tude and two low tides also of different heights occur during each lunar day. San Francisco Bay communicates to the ocean through the narrow Golden Gate. The narrow opening creates a lag in the time of low and high tides between the entrance to the bay and the southern reaches of the bay. At the San Mateo Bridge low tide is 1 hour 14 minutes later and 0.1 ft higher than at San Francisco (Fort Point). Miter (1928) and Gram (1966) have emphasized that the time and height of the tide is influenced by the prevailing winds. The wind is generally from the northwest and 46% of the time is between 4 and 10 knots (Conomos, 1963). WAVES: Due to the shallow character of the central bay, the prevailing winds produce an important amount of wave activity. Gram (1966) calculates that in east central San THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 Francisco Bay “the water depths are such that waves two feet or less in height would readily disturb the bottom material, thereby allowing the materials once deposited to again become suspended and probably transported.” The term wave front seems more appropriate than surf as a description of the advancing edge of the tide on a mud flat. The wave front of the incoming and out- going tides suspends and carries sediment with it. CURRENTS anp SEDIMENTS: Ripples in a substrate indicate the presence of a cur- rent. On the Oliver Brothers’ mud flat ripples are formed on the mud closest to shore and tend to diminish towards the lower part of the mud flat (Plate 44, Figures 1 to 3). The upper zone is most frequently subjected to sedi- ment suspension by the wave front. SANDERS (1956) and Kitcuinec et al. (1952) note that suspended sediments will tend to be deposited where the current which carries them decreases in speed. ‘The largest particles are first to settle out and then, as the current decreases, smaller and smaller particles will settle. On the present study site the combination of current (as reflected by ripples) and wave action produces a gradient in which coarse sediments are left in the upper part of the mud flat and the finest settle in the lower part of the flat. METHODS anp MATERIALS LINE TRANSECTS: The relationship between tide level and distribution was determined by taking core samples along 3 line tran- sects. Because the slope of the mud was very slight (es- pecially below the 1.5 ft tide level), a tidal difference of one tenth of a foot would bare 30m to 70m of mud. Exposure in this broad band of mud was the same, so samples were taken at 36.6 m intervals. The first line of 22 samples was taken from May 10 to June 3, 1967. This line was perpendicular to the shore- line and extended up into a small creek which drains the surrounding marshland. A line parallel to the first and 180m south was sampled the following month from June 10 to June 22. The backshore of this area consisted of a rock and concrete levee. Twenty-one samples were taken. From July 1 to July 12 a third set of 20 samples was taken along a line north of the first line lying at a 30° angle to it. The backshore consisted of marshland (Text figure 1). Vol. 11; No. 3 THE VELIGER Page 225 ——— 100 meters Ocean {Hayward Air *: Terminal Pacific 70) ky US We iG WS . ao 6 ° ° ° ° 43.42 41 40 39EIB 37) 736)9(35134 133) 32) 1311 30) 29) 28 517) 716 Figure 1 Number and location of samples taken on the Oliver Brothers’ mud flat. The scale on the figure refers only to the east-west dimension of the tide flat which is somewhat foreshortened in the north-south direction. The map is based on an aerial photograph taken from an oblique (south to north) angle. Page 226 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 CONSTRUCTION or tHe SAMPLERS: Two parameters were utilized to measure the fauna of the mud flat. The organisms in the mud were measured as numbers of individuals per core (in cubic centimeters). Those living on the mud surface were measured as num- bers of individuals per quadrat (in square centimeters). The core sampler consisted of an aluminum casing which fit snugly over a halfgallon milk carton with its base removed. The cross section of a half-gallon milk carton is 9.7 cm by 9.7 cm; the area 94.09 cm?. This is less than 6% short of a sampling area of 0.01 m?. To obtain a sample of mud the casing with the carton in it was pushed into the mud and brought up with a shovel. The carton was prevented from collapsing by ap- plying strips of masking tape to the inside of the carton which were then extended through the battom of the carton to the outside of the casing. TIDE 2.6 1.0 Nassarius obsoletus Macoma icons picua Tharyx parvus Flosmaris grandis Ampelisca miller Mediomastus californiensis Gemma gemma Neanthes succinea Mya arenaria Marphysa sanguinea Hemigrapsus oregonensis Ostrea 1 lurida 0 100 200 Previous authors have sampled to varying depths for Macoma inconspicua. FRASER (1932) went to a depth of 7.5 cm. No reason was given for this limitation, nor did Rees (1940) explain why he sampled to a depth of 18cm. BEANLAND (1940) took only the top 2.5 cm be- cause: “Previous work in the area seemed to indicate that the surface inch contained a representative fauna.” Brapy (1943) sampled to a depth of 25cm _ since the organisms did not penetrate to a greater depth. Preliminary work on the Oliver Brothers’ mud flat revealed a dense layer of clay about 20 cm beneath the surface. No animals penetrated into the clay; therefore, a sampling depth of 21 cm was chosen. Counting the numerous thread-like polychaetes was facilitated by subsampling. At one corner of each sample a 3cm by 3cm by 21 cm section was marked off. The subsample was sieved through a 0.297 mm mesh under running water. The upper 2 cm were also sieved through LEVEL ee ee ee ee ee 300 400 50cm 600 DISTANCE FROM SHORE IN METERS Figure 2 A comparison of the 3 transects. Heavy line, transect 1; light line, transect 2; dashed line, transect 3. Single light line indicates distri- bution of fauna not taken in the sampler in significant numbers. Vol. 11; No. 3 THE VELIGER Page 227 a 0.297 mesh. A geologic sieve of 0.5mm was used to sort the remainder of the sample. SAMPLING ror Nassarius obsoletus (Say, 1822): The mud snail Nassarius obsoletus (Say, 1822) was extremely abundant on the mud surface. The milk carton sampler took an adequate volume of mud to obtain significant numbers of the infauna; however, even at optimum densities of N. obsoletus the surface area of 94 cm? could potentially take only 3 or 4 snails per sample. In addition, the mud snail’s tendency to converge on a given area when a choice morsel of food was found also indicated a larger surface area should be taken. An aluminum frame 50cm by 50cm by 5cm was placed on the mud. The milk carton sample was taken in one corner and then the snails within the frame were picked up by hand. Nassarius obsoletus Macoma Mya inconspicua arenaria WWE ile Wie te (0) Up Tharyx parvus RESULTS DISTRIBUTION or COMMON SPECIES: The distribution according to tide level was the same for the 3 transects (Text figure 2). The difference in backshores did not appear to affect the faunal distribu- tion except in the case of transect 1. The backshore of this transect consisted of a creek bed and the mud therefore extended beyond the marshland and the rock levee of the other transects. The upper zone from the 2.5 ft tide level to 1.3 ft was characterized by Nassarius obsoletus, Macoma inconspi- cua and Tharyx parvus BERKELEY, 1929. Specimens of Streblospio benedictt WeBsTER, 1789 and Flosmaris gran- dis HAND & BUSHNELL, 1967 were occasionally observed in this region. Neanthes Mediomastus succinea Marphysa sanguinea Ambelisca milleri californiensis ee dd we ee tee eee eee e Figure 3 Per cent of each population at a given tide level. Page 228 From 1.2 ft to 0.9 ft several additional species ap- peared in the samples. This area appeared to be the upper limit for Mediomastus californiensis HARTMAN, 1944: Neanthes succinea (FREY & Leuckart, 1847) ; Marphysa sanguinea (Montacu, 1804); Mya arenaria Linnaeus, 1758; and Ampelisca milleri BARNARD, 1954. In addition, small numbers of Gemma gemma (ToTTEN, 1834); Hemigrapsus oregonensis (DANA, 1851) and a goby were recovered. This area corresponds to one of the critical tide levels described by Doty (1946). At the levels of 3.5 (LLHW), 3.0 (HHLW) and 1.0 (LHLW) there is a sudden increase in duration of a single exposure. At the end of the second transect Ostrea lurida Car- PENTER, 1864 was abundant on the surface of the mud. Specimens of the slipper shell Crepidula convexa Say, 1822 were found on the oysters. Specimens of the ane- mone Diadumene leucolena (VERRILL, 1866), two pos- sessing catch tentacles (VASSALLO, in press), were also found on the oysters. Text figure 3 represents the per cent of individuals in 8 common populations found at a given tide level. Nassarius obsoletus A total of 348 mud snails were taken in 43 quarter meter square samples. The maximum number taken in a single sample was 36. There was a gradual decrease in the numbers from the optimum region at 2.4 ft where 13% of the population was found. Macoma inconspicua Two hundred and fifty - six specimens of Macoma in- conspicua were taken in 63 milk carton samples. The clam was most abundant at the 2.6 ft tide level. A maximum of 13 per core was found in the optimum region where 17.5% of the population occurred. Mya arenaria Seventy specimens of Mya arenaria were taken in the core sampler. The upper limit was 1.3 ft. The optimal region was ().9 ft. No specimens were taken beyond the 0.1ft level. No more than 3 specimens were recovered in a single core. Neanthes succinea A total of 11 specimens of this polychaete was taken with the core sampler. The maximum number per core was 2. Neanthes succinea was evenly distributed over its range. The upper limit found during this survey was 1.0 ft. THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 Marphysa sanguinea Thirteen specimens of Marphysa sanguinea were ob- tained with the core sampler. No more than 1 specimen was found per core. The upper limit was 0.8 ft. Mediomastus californiensis Subsampling was utilized in the recovery of Medio- mastus californiensis from the milk carton core. Sixty- three specimens of this polychaete were taken. The upper limit of the polychaete was 1.3 ft. There was an increase from 1 per subsample to 3 per subsample in the optimum area at 0.9 ft. Tharyx parvus The cirratulid polychaete was found from the shoreline out to a distance of 100 m. Limitation to the upper zone is apparently not the direct effect of exposure per se since Jones (1961) found it in high numbers at a station 3 ft below MLLW. Ampelisca milleri Counts of this amphipod were made along one tran- sect because of the difficulty they presented to counting. Two hundred and fifty-five amphipods were taken in the subsamples from transect 2. The upper limit was about 1.2 ft where 3 amphipods per subsample were found. The numbers increased to the 0.7 ft level where a maximum of 29 per subsample were found. This is a conservative count. Sieving through a 0.297 mm mesh did allow some amphipods to pass through. When the mud was screened over trays, small amphipods passed through and within 2 days had built new tubes. DISTRIBUTION or tHE DOMINANT SPECIES: In a previous section on the sediments of the mud flat it was noted that ripples in the upper zone indicated a current was present along the shoreline. The current as well as the wave front of the incoming tide suspended sediment. Larger particles settled out first and lighter ones settled as the current decreased. At a distance of 150m from shore the ripples became less distinct until they were no longer present 300m from shore. The area between 150m and 300m was intermediate in strength of current and in size and amount of particles deposited on the surface. This zone between the area experiencing strong currents and the lower zone where no current was apparent might be con- Tue VELIcER, Vol. 11, No. 3 [VAssaLLo] Plate 44 “y Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 1: Detail of well defined ripples in the upper zone. Six inch rule for scale. Figure 2: Detail of intermediate zone. Note faint ripples. Figure 3: Lower zone of the mud flat. Ripples absent. Small pro- jections from the mud are tubes of Ampelisca milleri. The snails covered with detritus and diatoms are Nassarius obsoletus. Figure 4: Indentations characteristic of Busycotypus canaliculatus found in the lower zone of the mud flat. Vol. 11; No. 3 ° /o rl Macoma inconspicua a] Other Ampelisca milleri THE VELIGER Page 229 SLIGHT CURRENT INTERMEDIATE CURRENT STRONG uw x CURRENT = < 72) a wi a (2) < > (a) e a z uw o} fe) Zz 0 100 200 300 400 500 DISTANCE FROM SHORE IN METERS Figure 4 The dominant species of the community changes with distance from shore. sidered an ecotone. The existence of an ecotone on an intertidal mud flat was suggested by DExTER (1947). In the upper zone of the mud flat from 2.6 ft to 1.3 ft Macoma inconspicua formed 55% of all the individuals in the community and the amphipod Ampelisca milleri represented 1% of the individuals. In the intermediate zone the per cent of M. inconspicua dropped to an aver- age of 16% and the amphipod increased to 50%. In the lowest zone from 0.8 ft to —0.1 ft Ampelisca mil- leri was the dominant species forming 90% of the com- munity. The change of dominance is shown in Text figure 4. At the extreme ends of the figure two communities are evident. DISCUSSION Tue Macoma COMMUNITY: Macoma inconspicua occurs in subtidal (Forp, 1923; TuHorson, 1957) as well as intertidal muds. Brapy (1943), Spooner & Moore (1940) and Fraser (1932) found no definite trend with respect to tide level. ALLEN (1954) reports M. inconspicua in mud as well as mud- sand. HotmMe (1949) found it in soil ranging from moist sand to mud. Studies by BEANLAND (1940), ReEs (1940) and Fraser (1932) indicate that soil grade in itself does not appear to be the determining factor in the distribu- tion of M. inconspicua. Page 230 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 BEANLAND suggests that the abundance of Macoma inconspicua in estuaries depends on two factors: (a) quality and quantity of available food supply correlated with type of soil; and (b) available feeding time corre- lated with distance below high tide mark. Yonce (1949) found this species to be a detritus feeder. In the field as well as in the laboratory Macoma incon- 1.2 Transect 1 Y= 1:0798 —- .0023 x 75 150 225 300 375 450 Transect 2 = 13838 — .0036x 8 = “3 Dy = S 8 Ss 8 § is) S s 75 150 225 300 375 450 O Zz ) 1.2 é Transect 3 rs Y = 1:0796 —- .0022 — 75 150 225 300 375 450 DISTANCE FROM SHORE IN METERS Figure 5 Regressions of the number of Macoma taken on the Oliver Brothers’ mud flat Spicua was observed sweeping its siphon over the surface of the mud. In the course of the sweeping it would some- times crook the end of the siphon into the mud as if to loosen the surface of the mud. The inhalant siphons extended several centimeters out of the mud. Although they were long enough to extend towards the water above them, the siphons remained sweeping at the detritus- water interface. McNutty et al. (1962) found detritus feeders most abundant in fine soils. On the Oliver Brothers’ mud flat the greatest amount of detritus occurs in the lower zone. This area also has the greatest amount of feeding time, yet, contrary to BEANLAND’s suggestion, Macoma incon- spicua is most abundant in the upper zone where there is less detritus and less feeding time. In summary, the literature indicates that there does not appear to be direct relationship between distribution and exposure or particle size. The present study does not support BEANLAND’s suggestion that detritus and avail- ability of feeding time are important factors. THE Ampelisca COMMUNITY: Ampelisca milleri is found subtidally to a record depth of 65 fathoms (Barnarp, 1967). In San Francisco Bay, Jones (1961) found it to be abundant at a station 3 ft below Mean Lower Low Water. Jones (op. cit.) noted that the sediment was coarse at the station where Ampelisca was abundant and finer where it was present in smaller numbers. No other infor- mation on the ecology of Ampelisca milleri was found. Eneguist (1950) noted that the ampeliscid Haploops cannot build its tubes in pure clay or coarse sand. The tubes of A. milleri on the Oliver Brothers’ mud flat were made of fine sediment. The need for tube construc- tion could restrict the species to finer soils. All of the ampeliscids studied by ENEQuisT were found to be detritus feeders. In the present study Ampelisca was observed in the laboratory to continuously swecp detritus with its long antennae and move particles toward its mouth — indicating this species may also be a detritus feeder. In the intermediate and lower zones of the mud flat water does not drain completely from the mud flat. This residual water could serve to protect Ampelisca from desiccation. Hart (1930) suggests that such a layer of water may protect Corophium volutator from desicca- tion. Like Ampelisca milleri, C. volutator feeds on detri- tus and lives at the mud surface in semi-permanent tubes (Hart, op. cit.). BEANLAND (1940) noted that when Corophium leaves its tube, it is at the mercy of the currents. Ampelisca Vol. 11; No. 3 THE VELIGER Page 231 was observed caught in the movements of outgoing tides on the Oliver Brothers’ mud flat. BEANLAND suggested that shelter may be an important factor affecting the distribution of Corophium. She noted that, where Coro- phium was found in previous studies, it occurred in sheltered arcas where the amphipod was protected from currents which could sweep it away. GoopHarT (1941) records that it is absent from steep banks where it might be washed away by the current. Transect 2 Y = 1-3700 + .0008 X 2.1 LOG NO. Ampelisca | miller DISTANCE FROM SHORE IN METERS Figure 6 Regression of the number of Ampelisca taken on Oliver Brothers’ mud flat In the Dovey Estuary, BEANLAND found that as shelter decreases from shore to low water the numbers of Coro- phium decrease. On the Oliver Brothers’ mud flat the presence of ripples in the upper tide level and their ab- sence in the lower level indicates that “shelter” in the sense of less overturn of mud by the current increases with a decrease in tide level. The upper tide level is also less sheltered in the sense it is more frequently exposed to the sediment stirring influence of the incoming and outgoing tide. In summary, the accumulation of detritus and the presence of shelter seem to be important in affording favorable conditions to the maintenance of the Ampelisca community in the lower zone of the mud flat. It could be argued that the distribution (abundance in the upper flat) of Macoma inconspicua is due to phys- iological differences in the San Francisco Bay population. However, north of this study area in upper San Francisco Bay, Fitice (1958) reports that M. inconspicua prefers the intertidal and upper 5 subtidal feet. Predation by Busycotypus canaliculatus (LINNAEUS, 1758) may be a factor limiting Macoma. Large inden- tations made by the whelk have been found in the lower zone of the mud flat (Plate 44, Figure 4). No living spe- cimens or shells have been dug from the mud or have been found on or near the Oliver Brothers’ mud flat. However, hundreds of individuals of this species are found on the mud flats in west central bay and fishermen stranded by low tide about a mile from the east shore have observed the whelk on the mud surface. The fact that Busycotypus has never been directly ob- served on the Oliver Brothers’ mud flat and the presence of relatively few indentations (in contrast to abundant numbers occurring on exposed flats of west central bay) suggests that Busycotypus may not be a major limiting factor. Both in San Francisco Bay and the Dovey Estuary (BEANLAND, 1940) numbers of detritus feeding amphi- pods populate the mud flats. In the Dovey Estuary the amphipod community dominates the upper tide levels (BEANLAND, op. cit.). As the level decreases, the numbers of amphipods decrease and the clam Macoma incon- Spicua appears and gradually replaces the amphipod as the dominant species. On the Oliver Brothers’ mud flat it is M. inconspicua that dominates the upper tide level and is replaced by an amphipod community at the lower Table 1 Faunal Change with Distance from High Tide Mark on the Oliver Brothers’ Mud Flat Sample No. Ampelisca miller Macoma inconspicua 23 - 9 24 — 12 25 - 13 26 9 7 27 24 4 28 24 10 29 36 a 30 33 6 31 45 3 32 60 1 33 57 1 34 81 = 35 78 = 36 78 = 37 81 = 38 75 = 39 75 = Ragves232 THE VELIGER Vol, Mig Noss level. Tables 1 and 2 give the results of the present study and that of BEANLAND’s study.In both areas the sample number represents increasing distance from shore. It should be noted that BEANLAND’s sampling area was one meter square. Table 2 Faunal Change with Distance from High Tide Mark, BEANLAND, 1940 Sample No. Corophium volutator Macoma inconspicua 1 = = 2 445 1 3 24 - 4 191 1 5 44 11 6 2 2 7 844 6 8 455 2 9 82 1 10 Di2 2 11 20 1 12 29 - 13 11932 16 14 1 11 15 5 7 16 24 15 17 2 19 18 1 8 19 - 401 20 = 195 21 - 369 22 - 416 23 - 657 24 - 58 25 - 4 26 - - 2 Probably a mixture of Corophium volutator and C. arenarium The Tables and the regressions in Text figures 5 and 6 show an inverse relationship between the amphipod and Macoma inconspicua. The correlation itself does not necessarily imply a direct effect of one variable on an- other. However, the feeding habits of M. inconspicua and the amphipods suggest that this correlation may be significant. That Ampelisca lies on its dorsum sweeping its anten- nae over the surface, has already been mentioned. If, incleed, this is an indication that it is a detritus feeder as were all of the ampcliscids studied by ENEguist (1950), then the tremendous numbers of A. miller: (roughly 8000 individuals per m’) are significant competitors with Macoma inconspicua for this food. In addition to competition for food, the sweeping habit could conceivably affect the spat fall. SEGERSTRALE (1957) reported that in an area of the Baltic, where the amphipod Pontoporeia affinis is abundant, the Macoma inconspicua population has failed over a number of years. He suggested that the amphipods may eat young Macoma as they sink to the bottom after the planktonic stage. KaANNEWoRFF (1965) found that Ampelisca macro- cephala feeds on detritus in the field. In his laboratory, however, the amphipod was observed to create currents in which Mytilus larvae, copepods and Artemia salina were carried to the gnathopods and then transferred to the mouth. Pontoporeia and Ampelisca macrocephala are about 4 times larger than A. millert. While A. millert may not be large enough to prey on the spat, the sweeping motion of the antennae could prove a physical barrier to the spat. At Icast 3 possibilities of competition between Macoma and Ampelisca millert exist: (1) the use of detritus as food, (2) predation by the amphipod on the spat, and (3) physical interference with spat fall. SUMMARY 1. The distribution of invertebrates on and in a mud flat of central San Francisco Bay was studied. 2. Near the 1.0 ft level, one of the critical tide levels cited by Doty (1946), the number of animals in the mud flat increased. 3. Two communities were found on the mud flat. Maco- ma inconspicua was the most abundant organism in the upper zone. This community gradually gave way to one dominated by the amphipod Ampelisca millert. 4. The distribution of Macoma inconspicua appears to be determined by currents which affect sediment settle- ment and by degree of shelter. Sediment and shelter favor the amphipod which competitively excludes Maco- ma inconspicua. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS For their advice and encouragement I would like to thank the members of my committee: Dr. James Ny- bakken, Dr. Howard L. Cogswell and Dr. Robert Main. Vole its No:3 I am grateful to Dr. Olga Hartman for her help with the identification of the polychaetes. To Dr. J. L. Barnard I owe thanks for his lesson in the identification of an amphipod. I would also like to thank the Oliver Brothers’ Salt Company for the use of its tide lands. LITERATURE CITED ALLEN, J. FRANCES 1954. ‘The influence of bottom sediments on the distribution of five species of bivalves in the Little Annemessex River, Chesapeake Bay. Nautilus 68 (2): 56-65 Apuin, J. A. 1967. Biological survey of San Francisco Bay 1963 - 1966. Mar. Resources Oper. Ref. No. 67-4, Mar. Operat. Lab., Menlo Park, Calif: BarRnarD, J. LAURENS 1967. | New species and records of Pacific Ampeliscidae (Crus- tacea : Amphipoda). Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 121: 1-20 BEANLAND, FE. Louise 1940. Sand and mud communities in the Dovey estuary. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U. K. 24: 589 - 611 Conomos, T. Joun 1963. Geologic aspects of the Recent sediments of South San Francisco Bay. Master of Sci. Thesis, San Jose State Coll., San Jose, Calif. Dexter, Ratpu H. 1947. The marine communities of a tidal inlet. Ecolog. Monogr. 17: 236 - 295 Doty, M.S. 1946. Critical tide factors that are correlated with the vertical distribution of marine algae and other organisms along the Pacific coast. Ecology 27: 315 - 328 ENEQuIST, PAUL 1950. Studies on the soft-bottom amphipods of the Skagerak. Zool. Bidr. Uppsala 28: 297 - 492 Firice, Francis P. 1954a. An ecological survey of the Castro Creek area in San Pablo Bay. Wasmann Journ. Biol. 12: 1 - 24 1954b. A study of some factors affecting the bottom fauna of a portion of the San Francisco Bay estuary. Journ. Biol. 12: 257 - 293 Wasmann 1958. Invertebrates from the estuarine portion of San Fran- cisco Bay and some factors influencing their distribution. Wasmann Journ. Biol. 16: 159 - 211 Forp, E. 1923. Animal communities of the level sea-bottom in the waters adjacent to Plymouth. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U. K. 13: 164 - 224 THE VELIGER Page 233 Fraser, JAMES H. 1932. Observations on the fauna and constituents of an estuarine mud in a polluted area. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. Goopuart, C. B. 1941. The ecology of the amphipods in a small estuary in Hampshire. Journ. Anim. Ecol. 10: 306 - 322 Gram, RALPH 1966. The marine geology of the Recent sediments of central San Francisco Bay. Master of Sci. Thesis, San Jose State Coll., San Jose, Calif. Hart, T. J. 1930. Preliminary notes on the bionomics of the amphipod Corophium volutator. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 16: 761 - 789 Houmeg, N. A. 1949. The fauna of sand and mud banks near the mouth of the Exe estuary. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 28: 189 to 237 Jones, MerepitH L. 1961. A quantitative evaluation of the benthic fauna off Point Richmond, California. Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool. 67: 219 - 320 KANNEWORFF, EBBE 1965. — Life cycle, food and growth of the amphipod Am pelis- ca macrocephala LitjEBorc from the Oresund. Ophelia 2: 305 - 318 Kitcuine, J. A., Sytvia J. Litty, SHeita M. Lopce, J. F SLoane, R. BassInpALeE & FE J. Esiinc 1952. The ecology of Lough Ine rapids with special reference to water currents. III. The effect of current on other environ- mental conditions. Journ. Ecol. 40: 179 - 202 McCarty, JAMEs C., R.A. WacGNER & ERMAN A. PEARSON 1962. An investigation of water and sediment quality and pol- lutional characteristics of three areas in San Francisco Bay, 1960 - 61. Berkeley: Sanit. Eng. Res. Lab., Univ. Calif. McNutty, J. KNEELAND, Ropert C. Work & Hirary B. Moore 1962. Some relationships between the infauna of the level bottom and the sediment in south Florida. Bull. Mar. Sci. Gulf and Carib. 12: 322 - 332 Miier, Rospert C., Witttam D. RaAMacE « Epcar L. LAziEer 1928. A study of physical and chemical conditions in San Francisco Bay, especially in relation to the tides. Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool. 31: 201 - 267 PacKarp, Earv L. 1918a. Molluscan fauna from San Francisco Bay. Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool. 14: 199 - 452 1918b. A quantitative analysis of the molluscan fauna of San Francisco Bay. Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool. 18: 299 - 336 Rees, Couin B. 1940. A preliminary study of the ecology of a mud flat. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 24: 189 - 199 Page 234 ROsEWATER, JOSEPH 1968. Itinerary of the voyage of H.M.S. Blossom, 1825 to 1828. The Veliger 10(4) : 350 - 352 (1 April 1968) SANDERS, Howarp L. 1958. Benthic studies in Buzzards Bay. I. Animal sediment relationships. Limnol. & Oceanogr. 3: 243 - 258 SEGERSTRALE, SVEN G, 1957. Baltic Sea. ecology. J. W. Hedgpeth (ed.) 1: 751 - 800 SPoonerR,.G. M. « Hitary B. Moore In Treatise on marine ecology and paleo- Geol. Soc. Amer. Mem. 67, 1940. The ecology of the Tamar estuary. VI. An account of the macrofauna of the intertidal muds. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 24: 283 - 330 Srorrs, Puitip N., Ropert BE. SELLEcK & ERMAN A. PEARSON 1964. A comprehensive study of San Francisco Bay 1962-1963. Berkeley: Sanit. Eng. Res. Lab., Univ. Calif. THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 Sumner, Francis B., Gzorce D. LoupERBAcK, WALDO SCHMITT & Epwarp C. JoHNSTON 1914. A report upon the physical conditions in San Francisco Bay based upon the operations of the United States Fisheries Steamer “Albatross” during the years 1912 and 1913. Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool. 14: 1 - 198 THorRSON, GUNNAR 1957. | Bottom communities. In Treatise on marine ecology and paleoecology. J. W. Hedgpeth (ed.) Geol. Soc. Amer. Mem. 67, 1: 461 - 534 VASSALLO, MariLyn T. in press. A report on the sea anemone Diadumene leucolena (VERRILL) YoncE, CuHarLes Maurice 1949. On the structure and adaptations of the Tellinacea, deposit-feeding Eulamellibranchia. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc London, B. 234: 29 - 76 Vol. 11; No. 3 THE VELIGER Page 235 Spawning of the American Oyster, Crassostrea virginica, at Extreme pH Levels BY ANTHONY CALABRESE AND HARRY C. DAVIS Bureau of Commercial Fisheries, Biological Laboratory, Milford, Connecticut 06460 (Plate 45) Tue AMERICAN OYSTER, Crassostrea virginica (GMELIN, 1791), is the most important commercial mollusk of the Atlantic Coast and the Gulf of Mexico. Of the various interacting biological, physical, and chemical factors that affect oysters in these waters, pH has received less atten- tion than any other major factor. PryTHERCH (1928), who measured pH at several stations in Milford Harbor and the Milford area of Long Island Sound, found that it ranged from 7.2 to 8.4 during the day. He observed that oysters in Milford Harbor spawned at pH 7.8 and 8.2 and concluded that low pH inhibited oyster spawning and that oysters in Milford Harbor spawned at high tide because this was the only tidal stage at which the pH was between 7.8 and 8.2. In laboratory experiments LoosANOFF & ‘TOMMERS (1947) determined that adult oysters kept in water ad- justed to pH 4.25 remained open, on an average, 76% of the time, but pumped only 10% as much water as did control oysters kept in water of pH 7.75. Oysters kept at pH 6.75 and 7.00 initially pumped more vigorously than the controls, but the rate of pumping later decreased to less than that of the controls. Although the pH of sea water usually ranges from 7.5 to 8.5, the pH in tidepools, bays, and estuaries may decrease to 7.0 or lower due to dilution and production of H.-S (Sverprup et al, 1942). These inshore areas con- stitute a major portion of the habitat of oysters, and Davis & CaLaBrese (1964) suggested that these regions may also be exceedingly important as nursery grounds for larval stages. Since oyster larvae must, at times, encoun- ter a wide range in pH in their natural habitat, it is possible that success or failure of recruitment in some areas may be determined by variations in pH. In previous studies CALABRESE & Davis (1966) found that normal development from the fertilized egg to the 48-hour, straight-hinge larval stage took place within the pH range from 6.75 to 8.75. In experiments with oyster larvae, which were terminated after 12 days at experi- mental pH levels, more than 68% of the larvae survived within the pH range from 6.25 to 8.75, and the lowest pH limit for survival was 6.00. The optimum pH for larval growth was from 8.25 to 8.50, although growth was good from 6.75 to 8.75. At pH 9.00 to 9.50 the per- centage of eggs that developed normally, the percentage of larvae that survived, and the percentage increase in mean length decreased rapidly. The present experiments were initiated to determine the minimum and maximum pH at which oysters will spawn and to determine the length of time that eggs and sperm remain viable at these extreme pH levels. The methods used at this laboratory for conditioning oysters and obtaining gametes have been described previously by LoosanorF & Davis (1963). In these experiments we placed oysters in normal laboratory sea water (pH ap- proximately 7.8) and sea water adjusted to the desired pH level with either HCl or NaOH. We attempted to induce spawning by either of two methods: (1) by raising the temperature of the sea water to approximately 29° C and simultaneously adding to the sea water small quantities of sperm suspension made from gonadal mate- rial of ripe male oysters (combined thermal and chemi- cal stimulation), and (2) by thermal stimulation only (Plate 45). We concluded from these experiments that the mini- mum and maximum pH levels at which American oysters will spawn are 6.0 and 10.0, respectively. A summary of Page 236 the data collected at these pH levels is presented in Table 1. Table 1 Spawning of American oysters at extreme pH levels as compared to spawning at normal pH Group 1 Group 2 = a 2 as a are S Es Sa Bees 3 a 2S aie Number of oysters used 155 114 118 100 Number spawned 23. « 58 28 46 Percentage spawned 14.8 50.9 23.7 46.0 Number of males spawned 21 38 19 27 Number of females spawned 2! 20 9 19 ' pH when spawning was observed was 6.4 As indicated in Table 1, the percentage of oysters that spawned at pH 6.0 and 10.0 was considerably lower than the percentage that spawned at normal pH of sea water. In all tests male oysters spawned more readily than fe- males and at pH 6.0 it was most difficult to induce females to spawn. To determine the viability of eggs and sperm from oysters spawned at pH 6.0 and 10.0 we induced spawn- ing by thermal stimulation only. As male or female gam- etes were released, we attempted fertilization with male or female gametes released from spawners at normal pH. Eggs or sperm released at pH 6.0 or 10.0 were removed after 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 240, and 360 minutes of exposure to those pH levels and we tried ferti- lization with normal eggs or sperm to test viability. Al- though the data are insufficient to determine precisely how long eggs and sperm can tolerate these extreme pH levels, it is obvious that oyster eggs and sperm released at pH 6.0 and 10.0 lose their viability rapidly, and are no longer viable after 2 to 4 hours. GaLttsorr (1964) re- ported that fertilizability of oyster eggs kept under nor- mal sea-water conditions decreased to about 20% in 10 hours, and that only a few eggs fertilized after 10 and 24 hours cleaved normally. He also stated that sperm, kept at room tempcrature in a dilute suspension, lost their fertilizing ability within 4 to 5 hours. In consideration of this finding we tried fertilization with 15- and 210-min- ute-old gametes from a male and female that spawned at normal pH. Development to the straight-hinge stage with the 15-minute-old gametes was 100% ; with the 210- min- ute-old gametes development was only 77%. At this time THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 we also tried fertilization with 15- and 210-minute-old gametes from a male that spawned at pH 6.0 and the same female that spawned at normal pH. Development to the straight-hinge stage with the 15-minute-old gam- etes was 100%; with the 210-minute-old gametes devel- opment was only 48%. The lowered viability of eggs and sperm in these experiments was, therefore, due to a com- bination of pH and aging. The spawning season of the American oyster in Long Island Sound extends from late June to early September (LoosanorF, 1965). During this time excessive changes of pH caused by siltation or pollution could cause a failure of recruitment of oysters into the population. SUMMARY The minimum and maximum pH levels at which the American oyster, Crassostrea virginica, will spawn are 6.0 and 10.0, respectively. Oyster eggs and sperm released at pH 6.0 and 10.0 lose their viability rapidly within 2 to 4 hours. Lowered viability was due, however, to a combination of pH and aging. LITERATURE CITED CaLaABRESE, ANTHONY & Harry Cari Davis 1966. _ The pH tolerance of embryos and larvae of Mercenaria mercenaria and Crassostrea virginica. Biol. Bull. 131 (3): 427 - 436 (December 1966) Davis, Harry Cart & ANTHONY CALABRESE 1964. Combined effects of temperature and salinity on de- velopment of eggs and growth of larvae of M. mercenaria and C. virginica. Fish. Bull. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Serv. 63: 643 - 655 Ga.tsorF, PauL SIMoNn 1964. The American oyster Crassostrea virginica GMELIN. Fish. Bull. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Serv. 64: 480 pp. LoosaNorF, Victor Lyon 1965. | Gonad development and discharge of spawn in oysters of Long Island Sound. Biol. Bull. 129 (3): 546 - 561 (December 1965) LoosanorF, Victor Lyon « Harry Cart Davis 1963. Rearing of bivalve mollusks In: Advances in Marine Biology, EF S. Russet (ed.), Acad. Press, London 1: 1 - 136 Loosanorr, Victor Lyon « FRANCES DorEetTa TOMMERS 1947. Effect of low pH upon rate of water pumping of oysters, Ostrea virginica. Anat. Record 99: 112 - 113 PryTHERCH, HERBERT F. 1928. Investigation of the physical conditions controlling spawning of oysters and the occurrence, distribution, and setting of oyster larvae in Milford Harbor, Connecticut. Bull. U.S. Bur. Fish. 44: 429 - 503 Sverprup, H. U., Martin W. JoHNson & RicHarp H. FLeminc 1942. The Oceans, their physics, chemistry and general biol- ogy. Prentice-Hall, Inc., New York, 1087 pp. THE VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 3 [CALABRESE] Plate 45 Inducing spawning of oysters by immersing dishes of sea water containing oysters in warm water on spawning table and adding sperm suspension Vol. 11; No. 3 THE VELIGER Page 237 Invertebrates Taken in Six Year Trawl Study in Santa Monica Bay JOHN G. CARLISLE, Jr. Marine Resources Operations, California Department of Fish and Game, California State Visherics Laboratory Terminal Island, California 90731 INTRODUCTION In 1958 THE BuREAU OF SANITATION, City of Los Ange- les and the California Department of Fish and Game entered into an informal agreement as part of a surveil- lance program for Santa Monica Bay. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects on the marine en- vironment, as measured by bottomfish catches, of waste discharges from the Hyperion Treatment Plant, the large scale sewage waste disposal plant for the City of Los Angeles. This plant discharged effluent varying from 261 to 283 million gallons of waste a day during the 6 years of the study. In addition, solids discharged into the ocean by the sludge line ranged from 130 to 156 tons per day. The effluent line is 5 miles long, the sludge line 7. The biological work was done by Department of Fish and Game biologists; the City of Los Angeles provided the boat, equipment, and crew. In the past, all attempts to prove any long-term and subtle influence of major waste discharges on an open coastal biotope have failed (Lupwic & Onopera, 1964). A large amount of data was gathered during 6 years of trawling from 1958 through 1963. The analysis of the data pertaining to bottomfish populations is the subject of another report (CaruisLeE, in press). The present report deals with the large quantity of invertebrates, primarily mollusks, taken incidental to the catch of bottomfish. METHODS Trawling was conducted from the Prowler, a 65-foot converted salmon troller used in the Santa Monica Bay monitoring program. Trawling equipment included a winch deriving its power from the main engine, and an A-frame on the fantail through which a single cable led over a block to the trawl net. A 25-foot cable bridle was attached to a pair of otter boards fixed to short lines on the wings of the net. The boards were 12- by 18-inch steel-reinforced plywood weighted heavily along the bot- tom. The net was a 24-foot semi-balloon or tri-net with a body of 14-inch mesh, number 18 twine. The liner of the bag was of 4-inch mesh synthetic material. Thirty-nine regular stations in depths of 60 to 600 fect were sampled every 3 months. While difficulties in sched- uling the boat and crew made it impossible to adhere to the quarterly program perfectly, it was followed as close- ly as possible. Each trawl lasted 10 minutes, clocked from the time the net was on the bottom (and fishing) until the winch was started and net retrieving began. All fishes were returned to the California State Fisheries Laboratory for further study. Invertebrates were counted and returned to the water or saved for later identification. During the 6 years, 705 net hauls were made. It was impossible to assess the catch of invertebrates in the same manner as the bottomfish because the net was designed to catch fishes and not invertebrates. How- ever, the large incidental catch of invertebrates was of considerable interest since it provided information on population densities, distribution in depth and ecological associations. No attempt was made to evaluate the cat- ches as proof of pollution or non-pollution of the area. Only live individuals were tallied; dead shells were abun- dant in many hauls but they were not noted since their distribution could have been influenced by currents or other factors. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research was begun and supervised for the first 5 years by John L. Baxter before I took over the project. The work accomplished and subsequent help on many Page 238 occasions are gratefully acknowledged. John E. Fitch was extremely helpful throughout the entire study. Sincere thanks are due to many in a truly cooperative project, especially in carrying out the field work. The following, in particular, must be included: Gordon Chap- man, William Craig, William Donnelly, Ronald Little, Dennis Peterson, and Donald Zumwalt. Norman J. Abramson also gave fully of his time with advice and help. I would like to take this opportunity to thank the following personnel of The Hyperion Treatment Plant and the Los Angeles Bureau of Sanitation for their con- sideration through the years: Eugene Nelson, Charles Gunnerson, Homer Rheinschmidt, Charles Imel, John Stanton, and Joseph Arai. Many thanks are also due those who helped in the task of invertebrate identification, particularly: S. Still- man Berry, James H. McLean, John Garth, Olga Hart- man, and Fred Ziesenhenne. Without all this help the project would have been truly impossible. One of the pleasures inherent in the completion of a research project is the opportunity to express gratitude to all those who made it possible. LIST or INVERTEBRATES TAKEN sy TRAWL INCIDENTAL to FISH CATCHES, 1958 To 1963 Frequency and Depth of Occurrence PORIFERA Occasional Depth range: 192 - 426 feet COELENTERATA Stylatula sp. sea pens Frequent Depth range: 60 - 600 feet Renilla sp. sea pansy Frequent Depth range: 60 - 104 feet Sea anemones Frequent Depth range: 180 - 600 feet Gorgonians Occasional Depth range: 120 - 570 feet ECHIUROIDEA Listriolobus pelodes VisuErr, 1946 Occasional Depth range: 108 - 354 feet THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 SIPUNCULOIDEA Occasional Depth range: 174 - 192 feet ANNELIDA Polychaeta Aphrodita refulgida Moore, 1910 sea mouse Frequent Depth range: 60 - 600 feet Phyllochaetopterus sp. seca mouse Occasional Depth range: 60 - 300 feet Hyalinoccia juvenalis Moore, 1911 Occasional Depth range: 186 - 300 feet Pectinaria californicnsis HARTMAN, 1941 Frequent, extremely large numbers at times Depth range: 360 - 564 feet ARTHROPODA Crustacea Cancer anthony Stimpson, 1856 yellow crab Frequent Depth range: 60 - 430 feet Cancer gracilis DANA, 1852 slender crab Frequent Depth range: 60 - 570 feet Loxorhynchus crispatus Stimpson, 1875 decorator crab Frequent Depth: 60 feet Loxorhynchus grandis Stimpson, 1857 ___ spider crab Frequent Depth range: 60 - 126 feet Pyromaia tuberculata (LockincTon, 1876) spider crab Frequent Depth range: 60 - 120 feet Hetcrocrypta occidentalis (DANA, 1854) elbow crab Occasional Depth range: 60 - 300 feet Mursia gaudichaudi’ (MtLNE-Epwarps, 1837) Frequent Depth range: 120 - 600 feet Randallia ornata (RANDALL, 1839) Frequent Depth range: 60 - 540 feet Portunus xantusu (Stimpson, 1860) Occasional Depth: 60 feet Portunus sp. Occasional Pinnixa longipes (LockincTon, 1877) Occasional Depth range: 120 - 420 feet Pleuroncodes planipes Stimpson, 1860 Depth: 60 feet Frequent Depth range: 174 - 180 feet Paralithodes sp. Occasional Depth not recorded Lopholithodes foraminatus (Stimpson, 1859) Occasional Depth range: 516 - 540 feet Panulirus interruptus (RANDALL, 1839) Occasional Depth: 60 feet Vol. 11; No. 3 Galathea californiensis BENEDICT, 1904 Occasional Depth range: 276 - 378 feet Crago nigromaculata (LockincTon, 1877) Frequent Depth range: 60 - 570 feet Crago alaskensis (RaTHBUN, 1902) Occasional Depth not recorded Sicyonia ingentis BURKENROAD, 1938 Frequent Depth range: 120 - 600 feet Pandalus jordani RatuBun, 1902 Frequent Depth range: 564 - 600 feet Spirontocaris sp. Frequent Depth range: 60 - 600 feet Penaeus californicus Kincstey, 1878 Occasional Depth not recorded Pseudosquilla bigelowi (Scumirt, 1940) Occasional Depth range: 60 - 222 feet MOLLUSCA Cephalopoda Rossia pacifica Berry, 1911 squid Frequent Depth range: 120 - 600 feet Loligo opalescens Berry, 1911 squid Frequent Depth range: 60 - 600 feet Octopus spp. octopus Frequent Depth range: 60 - 600 feet Tectibranchiata sea hares Frequent Depth range: 60 - 600 feet Nudibranchiata sea slug Frequent Depth range: 60 - 600 feet Gastropoda Diodora aspera (EscHSCHOLTZ, 1833) Occasional Depth range: 180 - 540 feet Puncturella cucullata (Goutp, 1846) Occasional Depth range: 240 - 300 feet Puncturella coopert CARPENTER, 1864 Occasional Depth range: 216 - 466 feet Crepidula sp. slipper shell Occasional Depth range: 60 - 246 feet Acteocina intermedia WILLETT, 1928 Frequent Depth range: 120 - 600 feet Philene alba Matrox, 1958 Occasional Depth range: 120 - 240 feet Turcica caffea Gass, 1865 Rare Depth range: 192 - 198 feet Cidarina cidaris ADAMS, 1864 Rare . Depth range: 252 - 360 feet Calliostoma tricolor Gasp, 1865 Frequent Depth range: 60 - 558 feet Calliostoma annulatum (LicutFoot, 1786) Occasional Depth range: 192 - 300 feet THE VELIGER Page 239 Calliostoma gloriosum Datu, 1871 Rare Depth: 80 feet Calliostoma turbinum Dat, 1895 Rare Depth: 80 feet Calliostoma variegatum CARPENTER, 1864 Rare Depth range: 252 - 324 feet Solariella peramabilis CARPENTER, 1864 Frequent Depth range: 180 - 300 feet Sinum scopulosum (Conran, 1849) Rare Depth range: 60 - 600 feet Acteon painei Dau, 1903 Rare Depth range: 252 - 300 feet Acteon punctocaelatus (CARPENTER, 1864) Rare Depth range: 210 - 240 feet Polinices altus (Dat, 1909) Rare Depth: 120 feet Polinices draconis (Dati, 1903) Occasional Depth range: 60 - 600 feet Polinices lewisti (Gouxp, 1847) Occasional Depth range: 60 - 126 feet Polinices recluzianus (DESHAYES, 1839) Frequent Depth range: 120 - 180 feet Cypraca spadicca Swainson, 1823 Rare Depth: not recorded Trivia rittert RayMonp, 1903 Rare Depth range: 276 - 300 feet Turbonilla sp. Occasional Depth range: 60 - 600 feet Balcis micans (CARPENTER, 1864) Occasional Depth range: 276 - 300 feet Eunaticina oldroydi (Dat, 1897) Frequent Depth range: 570 - 588 feet Eulima sp. Occasional Depth range: 120 - 588 feet Epitonium bellistriatum (CARPENTER, 1864) Rare Depth range: 54- 60 feet Epitonium sp. Rare Depth: 588 feet Opalia wroblewsky: Morcu, 1852 Rare Depth range: 276 - 288 feet Turritella coopert CARPENTER, 1864 Rare Depth: 192 feet Erato sp. Occasional Depth range: 120 - 228 feet Neosimnia catalinensis Berry, 1916 Frequent Depth range: 192 - 450 feet Bittium interfossa (CARPENTER, 1864) Rare Depth: 588 feet Bittium subplanatum Bartscu, 1911 Rare Depth: 180 feet Bittium sp. Frequent Depth range: 180 - 600 feet Page 240 Terebra pedroana Datu, 1908 Occasional Depth range: 60 - 120 feet Nassarius cooperi (ForBES, 1850) Rare Depth: 180 feet Nassarius fossatus (Goutp, 1850) Occasional Depth: 60 feet Nassarius insculptus (CARPENTER, 1864) Frequent Depth range: 180 - 600 feet Nassarius mendicus (Goutp, 1850) Occasional Depth: 60 feet Nassarius perpinguis (Hinps, 1844) Occasional Depth range: 60 - 192 feet Olivella baetica CARPENTER, 1864 Occasional Depth range: 60 - 300 feet Olivella pycna Berry, 1935 Occasional Depth: 60 feet Cancellaria coopert Gass, 1865 Frequent Depth range: 330 - 588 feet Cancellaria crawfordiana Dat, 1891 Frequent Depth range: 432 - 600 feet Mitra idae Mrivint, 1898 Frequent Depth range: 192 - 300 feet Mitrella carinata (Hinps, 1844) Rare Depth: 120 feet Mitrella gausapata (GouLp, 1850) Frequent Depth range: 180 - 420 feet Mitrella tuberosa (CARPENTER, 1864) Rare Depth: 60 feet Amphissa bicolor Dau, 1892 Rare Depth range: 414 - 420 feet Amphissa undata (CARPENTER, 1864) Occasional Depth range: 180 - 540 feet Shaskyus festivus (Hinps, 1844) Frequent Depth range: 60 - 564 feet Fusinus barbarensis (Trask, 1855) Occasional Depth range: 180 - 228 feet Pteropurpura macropterus DESHAYES, 1839 Rare Depth range: 66 - 180 feet Pteropurpura vokesaec EmMERSon, 1964 Occasional Depth range: 60- 72 feet Trophonopsis bentleyi (Dati, 1908) Frequent Depth range: 420 - 600 feet Trophonopsis lasius (Dati, 1919) Rare Depth range: 240 - 300 feet Trophonopsis scitulus (Day, 1891) Rare Depth range: 216 - 300 feet Trophonopsis triangulatus (CARPENTER, 1864) Rare Depth range: 180 - 600 feet Ocenebra barbarensis (Gass, 1865) Rare Depth: 252 feet Kelletia kelletu (Forsrs, 1850) Frequent Depth range: 60 - 564 feet THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 Daphnella clathrata Gass, 1865 Rare Depth range: 180 - 432 feet Forreria belchert (Hinps, 1843) Rare Depth: 60 feet Bursa californica (Hinps, 1843) Frequent Depth range: 60 - 387 feet Conus californicus Hinps, 1844 Frequent Depth range: 60 - 192 feet Megasurcula carpenteriana (Gass, 1865) Frequent Depth range: 60 - 600 feet Megasurcula stearnsiana (Raymonp, 1904) Occasional Depth range: 216 - 360 feet Antiplanes litus Dau, 1919 Rare Depth: 588 feet Antiplanes perversa (Gass, 1865) Rare Depth: 588 feet Antiplanes sp. Rare Depth range: 432 - 444 feet Burchia redondoensis (T. Burcu, 1938) Occasional Depth: 60 feet Elaeocyma empyrosia (DA, 1899) Occasional Depth range: 180 - 420 feet Mangelia arteaga DALL & Bartscu, 1910 Occasional Depth range: 180 - 420 feet Mangelia beta Datt, 1919 Rare Depth range: 336 - 456 feet Clathurella crystallina Gass, 1865 Rare Depth range: 576 - 600 feet Ophiodermella halcyonis (Daux, 1908) Rare Depth: 120 feet Pelecypoda Acila castrensis Hinps, 1843 Frequent Depth range: 360 - 600 feet Nucula tenuis Montacu, 1808 Occasional Depth range: 180 - 588 feet Nuculana hamata (CARPENTER, 1864) Occasional Depth range: 186 - 600 feet Nuculana acuta (Conrap, 1832) Occasional Depth range: 408 - 600 feet Yoldia ensifera Dati, 1897 Frequent Depth range: 336 - 600 feet Acquipecten latiauratus (ConraAp, 1837) Occasional Depth range: 60 - 456 feet Chlamys hastatus SowERBy, 1843 Occasional Depth range: 216 - 228 feet Lima hemphilli HERTLEIN & STRONG, 1946 Occasional Depth range: 60 - 234 feet Pecten diegensis Dati, 1898 Frequent Depth range: 60 - 408 feet Cardita ventricosa GouLp, 1850 Rare Depth: 558 feet Vol. 11; No. 3 Cyclopecten vancouverensis (WHITEAVES, 1886) Rare Depth range: 60 - 248 feet Delectopecten sp. Occasional Depth range: 180 - 564 feet Anomia peruviana D’OrBIGNY, 1846 ; Occasional Depth range: 324 - 330 feet Amygdalum pallidulum (Dau, 1916) Frequent Depth range: 180 - 600 feet Modiolus neglectus Soot-RYEN, 1955 Rare Depth: 180 feet Solamen columbianum (Datu, 1897) Occasional Depth: 180 feet Pandora filosa (CARPENTER, 1864) Occasional Depth range: 186 - 420 feet Solemya panamensis Dau, 1908 Occasional Depth range: 252 - 588 feet Hiatella arctica (Linnarvus, 1767) Occasional Depth range: 180 - 372 feet Lyonsia californica Conrap, 1837 Occasional Depth range: 180 - 192 feet Thracia trapezoides Conran, 1849 Rare Depth range: 330 - 480 feet Thyasira barbarensis Dati, 1889 Occasional Depth range: 180 - 600 feet Solen rosaceus CARPENTER, 1864 Occasional Depth: 60 feet Pscudochama exogyra (Conran, 1837) Occasional Depth range: 186 - 324 feet Pseudochama granti StRoNG, 1934 Occasional Depth range: 198 - 306 feet Cuspidaria apodema Dat1, 1916 Frequent Depth range: 180 - 588 feet Cuspidaria planetica DALL, 1908 Frequent Depth range: 234 - 600 feet Cuspidaria californica Dati, 1886 Rare Depth: 336 feet Nemocardium centifilosum (CARPENTER, 1864) Frequent Depth range: 120 - 444 feet Trachycardium quadragenarium (Conran, 1837) Occasional Depth range: 60 - 192 feet Lucinoma annulata (ReEve, 1850) Occasional Depth range: 384 - 420 feet Lucinoma tenuisculpta (CARPENTER, 1864) Occasional Depth range: 316 - 318 feet Compsomyax subdiaphana (CarPENTER, 1864) Frequent Depth range: 120 - 600 feet Cooperella subdiaphana (CARPENTER, 1864) Rare Depth: 120 feet Gari edentula (Gass, 1868) Rare Depth: 120 feet Macoma carlottensis WritrEAvEs, 1880 Frequent Depth range: 342 - 600 feet THE VELIGER Page 241 Macoma sp. Rare Depth range: 330 - 480 feet Tellina arenica HERTLEIN & STRONG, 1949 Occasional Depth range: 300 - 588 feet Amphineura Lepidozona retiporosa (CARPENTER, 1864) Occasional Depth range: 180 - 600 feet Scaphopoda Dentalium rectius CARPENTER, 1864 Frequent Depth range: 360 - 600 feet Dentalium vallicolens RayMonp, 1904 Rare Depth range: 384 - 420 feet BRACHIOPODA Glottidia albida (Hinps, 1844) Rare Depth range: 120 - 174 feet Terebratalia occidentalis (Dai, 1871) Occasional Depth range: 216 - 378 fect Laqueus californicus (Cocu, 1848) Rare Depth range: 384 - 432 feet ECHINODERMATA Asteroidea Astropecten sp. Frequent Depth range: 60 - 600 feet Large numbers at times Mediaster aequalis Stimpson, 1857 Frequent Depth range: 120 - 432 feet Astrometis sp. Occasional Depth: 300 feet Pisaster brevispinus (Stimpson, 1857) Frequent Depth range: 60 - 420 feet Luidia foliolata GruBe, 1866 Occasional Depth range: 60 - 564 feet Rathbunaster californicus FisHer, 1906 Occasional Depth range: 60 - 240 feet Ophiuroidea Frequent Depth range: 114 - 600 feet Echinoidea Allocentrotus fragilis Jackson, 1912 Frequent Depth range: 219 - 570 feet Large numbers at times Lytechinus anamesus H. L.Criarx, 1912 Frequent Depth range: 174 - 436 fect Large numbers at times Strongylocentrotus sp. Occasional Depth range: 114 - 252 fect Brisaster townsendi (Acassiz, 1898) Frequent Depth range: 60 - 540 feet Large numbers at times Page 242 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 Crinoidea Florometra perplexa A. H.Ciark, 1907 Frequent Depth range: 60 - 387 feet Holothuroidea Stichopus spp. Frequent Depth range: 60 - 600 feet Large numbers at times TUNICATA Salpa spp. Frequent Depth range: 60 - 378 fect Large numbers at times LITERATURE CITED CaruisLE, Joun G. Jr. in press. Results of a six-year trawl study in an area of heavy waste discharge: Santa Monica Bay, California. Lupwic, Harvey F « BEN ONopERA 1964. Scientific parameters of marine waste discharge. pp. 37-49 In: BE. A. Pearson (ed.), Advances in water pollu- tion research, vol. 3. Pergamon Press, New York, N. Y.; 431 pp. Vol. 11; No. 3 THE VELIGER Page 243 Pelecypod-Sediment Association in Tomales Bay, California BY DON MAURER Shellfish Laboratory, University of Delaware, Lewes, Delawarc 19958 ' (1 Map; 3 Tables) INTRODUCTION THIS STUDY WAS UNDERTAKEN to determine whether there was an association between distribution, abundance and size of pelecypods and sediment particle size. Re- search was conducted during the summers of 1961 through 1963 at the Pacific Marine station in Tomales Bay, located in Marin County, California between 38° 1400” N Latitude, 122°58’35’" W Longitude and 38°05’ 30” N Latitude, 122°49’40’” W Longitude. The species under study, Tellina buttont Dati, 1900, T: salmonea (CarPENTER, 1864), Mysella tumida (CarPENTER, 1864) Lyonsia californica Conrab, 1837, and Transennella tan- tilla (GouLp, 1852) were selected because they are nu- merous, widely distributed and occur in a variety of sediment types in Tomales Bay. Most research on bivalve- sediment relationships has been chiefly concerned with species commonly collected by dredges. Such collections mix different sediment types and tend to confuse natural pelecypod-substrate associations. The present study dif- fers from earlier investigations in that samples were col- lected with a quantitative grab which assures a collection of bivalves from the sediment in which they live, an important prerequisite for the determination of pelecy- pod-sediment associations. The purpose of the paper is to report the results of an investigation on bivalve-sediment relationships in Tomales Bay. Results indicate that distribution and abundance of all species except Transennella tantilla appear to be strongly influenced by sediment type. The average size of the tellinids and Mysella tumida is statis- tically associated with sediment particle size, whereas a corresponding significant association did not exist for Lyonsia californica and Tr. tantilla. ALLEN (1963) provides the most recent comprehensive review of studies concerning distribution, abundance and growth of bivalves related to substrate influences. Associ- ' Contribution No. 55, University of Delaware Marine Laboratories ation of tellinid species with sediment type has been reported in California by several authors, Packarp (1918) observed the occurrence of Tellina buttoni and T. salmo- nea in mud and sand and of the latter in gravel, and sand-shell substrates of San Francisco Bay. Reisu (1961) found T: buttonz in gray clay of a boat harbor in south- ern California. Ricketts & Carvin (1962) presented a sketch map which showed a Tellina sand facies in Toma- les Bay and Jones (1964) stated that species of Tellina were common benthic mollusks living in sand bottoms off southern California. As regards the other species, OLp- royD (1924) and Keep (1935) indicated that Transen- nella tantilla lives in fine sand and Lyonsia californica occurs in muds of bays. ReisH (1961) included L. cali- fornica in a species list of mollusks that were found in clay. However, these studies were primarily concerned with reporting the occurrence and relative number of these species in a general sediment type rather than de- fining any quantitative aspects of bivalve-sediment re- lationships. Furthermore, no studies are available on these species concerning their size related to sediment type. MATERIALS anno METHODS During the months of June, July and August of 1961 through 1963, 142 pelecypod-sediment samples were ob- tained aboard the R/V Bios Pacifica with a 0.1 square meter van Veen grab. At each collecting site, a sediment sample was taken, and the position, depth of water, volume of grab and a brief description of flora and fauna were recorded. Samples were washed aboard through a screen of 1.0mm mesh and the residue was placed in jars with 5 to 10% formalin. Pelecypods were sorted, identified, and counted in the laboratory. Measurements were taken on 3 297 individuals. Maxi- mum anterior-posterior dimension was selected to repre- sent the size of clams. This measurement is convenient Page 244 Sand ; Lawsons Flat Point iw: Pacific Ocean TOMALES BAY CALIFORNIA 0 5000 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 % = Tomales Bay LEGEND CS Coarse Sand MS Medium Sand SF Fine Sand SC Silt - Clay ¢ Sample Site f Double Point Figure 1 Index Map of Tomales Bay, California. Sediment Distribution and Sample Sites. and has been commonly used as an indication of size (KrisTENSEN, 1957). A vernier caliper was used to measure Lyonsia californica and larger specimens of tel- linids. An ocular micrometer and microscope reticle were used on Mysella tumida, Transennella tantilla and smaller tellinids. Measurements with all devices had an opera- tional error of 0.02 mm. Sediments were analyzed by standard sieve analyses Pipette analyses were required for silt and clay samples. A measure of the 20th, 50th, and 80th sediment per- centiles, the percentage of silt and clay, the sorting coef ficient (80th minus 20th divided by 50th) were deter- mined. Among 142 sediment samples 22%, 59%, 4%, and 14%, were mud, fine, medium, and coarse sand Vol. 11; No. 3 respectively (Table 1). Sediment types are defined in this table. Jounson (1965) has summarized the hydrographic conditions of the bay. These factors together with the substrate are important features in the ecology of bi- valves. It is often difficult to recognize the effect or to isolate the importance of one ecological factor to the exclusion of others. In order to assess the effect of sedi- ment type on pelecypod ecology in Tomales Bay an intensive study of animal-sediment relationships was also conducted in White Gulch. White Gulch is a small cove 4.8 km from the mouth of the bay (Map, Figure 1). The cove is naturally suited for such studies in that it contains various sediment types and has a relatively narrow range of hydrographic features compared to the wider range of conditions throughout the bay. Mertes (1962) has shown that subtidal conditions in White Gulch are homo- geneous with regard to water temperature and salinity. If pelecypod-sediment associations are relatively uni- Table | Abundance of Five Species of Bivalves in Different Sediment Types Se of Be Se GB gS oy a ¢ ie gle Be ce Se & Seo ef Bo He . 56 LS gO a AY =K A oA — —< Number of Sediment Samples 31 85 6 20 142 Percent of Sediment Samples 22 59 4 14 Tellina buttont Number of Clams 42 1049 53 9 1153 Percent of Clams 4 91 5 0.8 Tellina salmonea Number of Clams - 207 78 422 707 Percent of Clams ~ 29 11 60 Mysella tumida Number of Clams 6 308 — - 314 Percent of Clams 2 98 - - Transennella tantilla Number of Clams 592 160 33 170 955 Percent of Clams 62 17 3 18 Lyonsia californica Number of Clams 102 66 = = 1638 Percent of Clams 61 39 = = Total: 3297 The measurements which define sediment type refer to median particle size. THE VELIGER Page 245 form, then the ecological significance of sediment can be extended to similar associations found in the bay at large. A more detailed account of methods can be found in Maurer (1964). DISTRIBUTION ann ABUNDANCE In Tomales Bay Tellina buttoni has been collected from depths of 0.6 to 18.9m and lives mainly in depths of 4.6 to 10.6m. Locally 7: buttont occurs in the northern part of the bay from Sand Point to Pelican Point. South of Pelican Point it has been taken occasionally from holes and channels that lie along the western margin of the bay. This tellinid lives in sediment that varies from mud through coarse sand and, in rare cases, pebbles. It occurs most frequently and in greatest numbers in fine sediment. Ninety-one percent of JT. buttont were found in fine sand (Table 1) with 5 to 30% silt and clay. On the northeastern margin of White Gulch JT. buttonz lives in sediment that contains as much as 50% silt and clay. Fine sediment here is due to the gradual decay of eel grass and trapping of particulate matter by clusters of Zostera. Tellina salmonea dwells most frequently in depths be- tween 3.0 and 7.9m and it has the same depth range as T. buttoni. Although the salmon tellinid has not been collected intertidally, subtidal sampling and presence of many shells washed ashore on a beach north of Sand Point indicate that a large population lives in or just beyond the surf zone. Tellina salmonea ranges from the open ocean south to Pelican Point. Distribution south of Pelican Point agrees with that of 7? buttoni. Tellina sal- monea may inhabit fine sand; however, it occurs most frequently and in greatest numbers in coarse sediment with less than 5% silt and clay. Sixty percent of T. sal- monea were found in coarse sand with 29% and 11% in fine and medium sand respectively (Table 1). Range of depth of Mysella tumida is from the inter- tidal zone to 10.6m though this species more often in- habits depths from 1.2 to 9.1m. Mysella tumida ranges from ‘Toms Point to south of Pelican Point. South of Pelican Point distribution seems to be restricted to the same submarine topography that contains the tellinids. In this southern portion within the central axis of the bay, M. tumida is replaced by M. ferruginosa (Dati, 1916.) The former species lives in mud and fine sand and occasionally in medium sand, but typically inhabits fine sand with 10 to 30% silt and clay. Ninety-eight percent of M. tumida were taken from fine sand (Table 1). On the other hand, M. ferruginosa lives characteristically in mud with 70 to 100% silt and clay and was infrequently Page 246 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 Table 2 Pelecypod and Sediment Measurements Median Particle Size Average Clam Size in Relation to Spccies Clam Size in mm mm or % Silt & Clay Median Particle Size a © = o Sts oe = g 5 > 3 > 54 5 & 4 < a < Au 7) (e) Tellina buttoni 1.9-18.5 6.5 0.063 — 0.830 0.165 38 < 0.154 39) 38 > 0.154 Wee, Tellina salmonea 2.0 - 18.7 9.4 0.113 — 2.090 0.634 19 < 0.370 6.0 19 > 0.370 11.7 Mysella tumida 16- 38 2.7 0.052 - 0.190 0.132 18 < 0.122 2.8 18 > 0.122 2.6 Transennella tantilla 15- 9.4 4.3 100% to pebbles 43.1% 18 < OMI 4.4 18 > 0.177 4.3 Lyonsia californica 4.5 — 38.5 13.7 10.7% — 98.4% 86.5% 19 - - found in sand. In White Gulch M. tumida is numerous in Zostera beds and occurs often with Tellina buttoni. Lyonsia californica was collected from depths of 1.2 to 13,7 m and is taken more commonly from 3.0 to 9.1m. It ranges from just north of White Gulch to south of Double Point. This bivalve has been obtained almost exclusively from mud and fine sand, and when it occurs in White Gulch, it is collected from very fine sand. It lives essen- tially in sediment with 80 to 100% silt and clay and is characteristic of the southern two-thirds of the bay or of more northern localities where high concentrations of silt and clay accumulate in protected coves. Sixty-one percent and 39% of L. californica were collected from mud and fine sand respectively (Table 1). Among the 5 species it shows the most restricted occurrence in fine sediment. Transennella tantilla ranges from intertidal locations to the deepest (19.9 m) holes in the bay. The species may occur intertidally in great numbers at Lawsons Flat and White Gulch, although its occurrence is sporadic and seems to fluctuate like populations of Donax. Subtidally it generally inhabits depths from 3.0 to 9.1 m. Contrary to the distribution and abundance of the other 4 species Tr. tantilla is one of the most ubiquitous clams in the bay. It was found recently in a rocky intertidal area on the ocean side of Tomales Point and its range extends south of Double Point within the bay. This venerid occurs in channels and shoals from Hog Island northwards to Law- sons Flat and throughout the White Gulch area. Its great- est numbers and frequency are seen in mud. Sixty-two percent of Tr. tantilla were gathered from mud, while 18%, 17%, and 3% were collected from coarse sand, fine sand, and medium sand respectively (Table 1). In White Gulch, Tr. tantilla occurs throughout the range of sedi- ment types. SIZE ANALYSIS In addition to distribution and abundance another pele- cypod-sediment relationship was recognized. From Table 2 it can be inferred that there is some association between the size of tellinids and sediment particle size. For example, the average size of 19 samples of Tellina sal- monea from sediment with a median size less than 0.370 mm is 6.0mm, whereas the average size of 19 samples from sediment with median size greater than 0.370mm is 11.7 mm. To determine whether these relationships were signifi- cant, a hypothesis was posed and tested statistically. ‘The hypothesis, which defines an association between a de- pendent and independent variable, was that pelecypod size is associated with sediment particle size. Since bivalve and sediment sizes may not assume a bivariate normal distribution a nonparametric statistic, the Kendall Cor- relation Coefficient, was applied. HrepcpetH (1957) cautioned “that many of the data of ecology are non- parametric and hence not amenable to parametric tests,...’ According to SteceL (1956) the Kendall Correlation Coefficient does not make any assumptions concerning the distributional function. For each sample an average bivalve size was correlated with a sediment measurement (20th, 50th, and 80th sediment percentiles, sorting co- efficient, percent of silt and clay) and depth of water. From this a correlation coefficient was obtained and its Vol. 11; No. 3 THE VELIGER Page 247 probability was determined. Level of significance is 0.05 for all analyses. If size-frequency distributions are bimodal or polymod- al and standard deviations are high, average size can be misleading as an estimate of central tendency. Histograms of bivalve size indicated that, in most samples, variance was relatively low and that there were only a few irregu- lar distributions. As a check on the use of average size the median pelecypod size of some samples was correlated with a sediment particle measure. Results were compa- rable to those analyses in which the average clam size was used. However, average size was preferred because: (1) samples were generally large enough not to be un- duly influenced by extreme values; (2) average size Table 3 Summary of Statistical Analyses Sediment Percentiles 20th Tellina buttoni 1 White Gulch Correlation Coefficient 0.394 0.394 Probability 0.038* Samples (Specimens) 62(828) 2 Tomales Bay Correlation Coefficient 0.667 0.538 Probability 0.001+ Samples (Specimens) 13(241) Tellina salmonea 3 White Gulch Correlation Coefficient 0.286 0.786 Probability 0.199- Samples (Specimens) 16(144) 4 Tomales Bay Correlation Coefficient 0.636 0.673 Probability 0.003+* Samples (Specimens) 22 (563) Transennella tantilla 5 White Gulch Correlation Coefficient 0.238 0.095 Probability 0.281- Samples (Specimens) 6 Tomales Bay Correlation Coefficient 0.143 0.107 Probability 0.360- Samples (Specimens) 8 (266) Mysella tumida 7 White Gulch Correlation Coefficient -0.697 Probability 0.001+ Samples (Specimens) 36 (297) Lyonsia californica 8 Tomales Bay Correlation Coefficient Probability Samples (Specimens) 0.038* IBID 0.005* IBID 0.003* 0.002* IBID IBID IBID IBID IBID 0.430- 13(97) IBID 0.406- -0.515 0.010* a o) on Fu Ss =] Ss cee Sah vide 80th ao gz =A 0.424 0.348 -0.576 0.394 0.027* 0.058 0.005 ~—-0.038+ IBID IBID 58(870) 62(828) 0.461 -0.460 -0.187 0.026 0.014" 0.026 0.176- 0.452- IBID IBID 14(283) 13(241) 0.643 0.571 -0.429 0.357 0.016 0.031* 0.089- _—0.138- IBID IBID IBID IBID 0.636 0.418 0.003* 0.037* —0.163 0.079 0.245- 0.500- 0.333 0.333 0.143 0.238 0.1917 0.191- 0.386- 0.281- IBID IBID IBID IBID 0.286 -0.071 0.030 0.152 0.199 0.452- 0.448 0.248- IBID IBID 23(858) 23(858) 0.273 0.303 0.227. 0.500 O03 O08 — OSI OOM IBID IBID 37(314) 36(297) 0.398 0.444 0.090- —_0.060- 19(168) 19(168) + Statistically significant at 0.05 - Not statistically significant at 0.05 Page 248 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 of large numbers of specimens is easier to calculate than median or mode which require additional manipulation of raw data to define; (3) small samples contain in- sufficient entries to form clusters and so the mode is indeterminate. In such cases the mode can not be used and unless the average is applied, information may be lost. For Tellina buttoni, T. salmonea and Transennella tan- tilla the null hypothesis is that there is no association between increasing pelecypod size and increasing sedi- ment particle size, whereas the null hypothesis for Mysella tumida and Lyonsia californica is that there is no associa- tion between decreasing pelecypod size and increasing sediment particle size. Table 3 indicates that the average size of Tellina but- toni in the bay and White Gulch is, in general, signifi- cantly associated with sediment particle size. In White Gulch the highest correlation is the 80th sediment per- centile and the highest correlation in the bay is the 20th sediment percentile. For T: salmonea a significant associ- ation was found in the bay and White Gulch and its highest correlation is the 50th sediment percentile in both areas. The average size of Mysella tumida is also signifi- cantly associated with particle size. This species was not collected in sufficient numbers throughout the bay to be compared statistically with samples from White Gulch and therefore analyses were only made for samples from the latter area (Table 3). In contrast to the tellinids, the correlation of M. tumida is significant in a negative di- rection. With Transennella tantilla the average size is not significantly associated with particle size. Finally, since Lyonsia californica occurs almost exclusively in fine sedi- ment its average size was correlated only with percent of silt and clay. The correlation coefficient was not signifi- cant. DISCUSSION In the northern part of the bay, Sand Point to White Gulch, sediment type can be characterized as a sandy substrate, with medium and coarse sand in the channels and off headlands, and fine sand in protected coves and shoals. The stretch from White Gulch to Pelican Point represents a transitional area as sand size becomes finer and increases in organic material content. In the transi- tion area the occurrence of all five species overlaps. Pelican Point affords an excellent physiographic boundary for distribution patterns as it marks the beginning of the “mud line” or local sedimentary threshold in Tomales Bay. South of this point the substrate contains 70 to 100% silt and clay. Small patches of coarse sand and pebbles may occur off headlands, but these are usually confined to the western shore. Occasional beds of fragmented Ostrea lurida shells are present between Marshall and Double Point. Based on intensive sediment sampling it was found that fine sand actually extends in tongues slightly farther south than Pelican Point on both sides of the bay (personal communication, Dr. C. C. Daetwyler). The distribution of the species under study and the majority of subtidal pelecypods in the bay responds in a very sensitive fashion to the mud line. For example, the tellinids and Mysella tumida range essentially from the northern part through the transitional area and stop abruptly at the mud line. Tellina buttoni occurs in a wider range of sediment than T. salmonea. The former is best represented in fine sand with some organic material, while the latter finds its maximum development in clean, coarse sand. A few specimens of Lyonsia californica were found in White Gulch, yet it is almost exclusively restric- ted to sediment (70 to 100% silt and clay) south of Pelican Point. Distribution and abundance of Transen- nella tantilla is an exception as it appears to be uninflu- enced by sediment type. Concerning bivalve size and sediment size only the tellinids and Mysella tumida show any significant associ- ations. In general, as sediment particle size increases, size of the tellinids living in those sediments increases. This association is so marked that it can be observed in the field for both tellinids. Not so with M. tumida, for the difference in size between this mollusk in finer and coarser sediment is too small for detection in the field. Until statistical analyses were made it was unknown that the size of M. tumida decreases as particle size increases. It should be emphasized for at least the tellinids and Transennella tantilla that sediment associations in White Gulch are consistent with those found throughout the bay. If, as previously suggested, pelecypod-sediment associa- tions exist where hydrographic conditions are relatively uniform, then the ecological importance of sediment to similar bivalve associations in the bay at large can be confidently asserted. In passing, the largest forms and greatest numbers of Tellina salmonea occur north of Sand Point in pebbles and shell-sand and are commonly twice the size of individuals in medium and coarse sand south of the point. Here the influence of the ocean is unmistakable. Nevertheless, samples collected in close proximity to that area were shown statistically to be drawn from two different populations. Particle size was the striking environmental factor that differed. Although there were insufficient numbers of Mysella tumida and Lyonsia californica to compare sediment associations from Vol. 11; No. 3 THE VELIGER Page 249 White Gulch to the bay, both species were obviously best developed in a specific sediment type, fine sand for the former and mud for the latter. Work by Swan (1952), Pratr (1953), Pratr & CamMpBELL (1956), Weis (1957), and Pearce (1965) with other bivalves support the view that there can be causal relationship between bivalve distribution, abun- dance, size and sediment type. Maurer (1967a) was concerned with the biological significance of sediment to pelecypods. Working with the same species except Lyon- sia californica, Maurer, (1967 a, 1967 b, 1967 c)_ pro- vided experimental evidence to indicate that the effect of turbidity and sediment as a food source were impor- tant factors influencing bivalve-sediment associations. The writer submits that sediment type may be a limiting factor in determining the distribution and abundance of Tellina buttoni, T: salmonea, Mysella tumida, and L. californica in Tomales Bay. Moreover, the size of the tellinids and Mysella tumida appears to be influenced by sediment. No explanation for the significant negative correlation coefficient obtained with M. tumida is offered at the present, and no noteworthy bivalve-sediment asso- ciations were recognized with Tr. tantilla. Although the effect of some important life-cycle aspects (life span, reproductive periods, size of settling larvae, larval sub- strate preference) remain to be studied in order to more completely evaluate the proposed sediment relationships, the writer asserts that the broad outline and definition of the pelecypod-sediment associations are valid. LITERATURE CITED ALLEN, JoHN A. 1963. Ecology and functional morphology of molluscs, in Harotp Barnes (ed.), Oceanography and marine biology, an annual review. 1: 253 - 288. | George Allen and Unwin, Ltd., London HepcpPETH, JoEL W. 1957. | Concepts of marine ecology. Jn: Treatise on marine ecology and paleoecology. J. W. Hedgpeth, ed. Geol. Soc. Amer. Mem. 67 (1): 29-52 JouNson, Ratpu G. 1965. _Pelecypod death assemblages in Tomales Bay, Califor- nia. Journ. Paleon. 39 (1): 80-85 Jones, G. FE 1964. The distribution and abundance of subtidal benthic Mollusca on the mainland shelf of southern California. Malacologia 2 (1): 43-68 Keen, A. Myra 1963. Marine molluscan genera of western North America: An illustrated key. Stanford Univ. Press; 126 pp.; text figs. not separately numbcred (14 February 1963) KEEP, JosIAH 1935, | West coast shells. Rev. by Josuua L. Baty, Jr. Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, Calif. pp. 1 - 350 KRISTENSEN, INGVAR 1957. Differences in density and growth in a cockle population in the Dutch Wadden Sea. Arch. Neerl. Zool. 12: 351 - 454 Maurer, Don 1964. Pelecypod size and sediment size. tion, Univ. of Chicago, Library, pp. 1 - 98 Ph. D. disserta- 1967 a. Filtering experiments on marine pelecypods from Toma- les Bay, California The Veliger 9 (3): 305 - 309 (1 January 1967) 1967b. Burial experiments on marine pelecypods from Tomales Bay, California. The Veliger 9 (4): 376 - 381 (1 April 1967) 1967. Mode of feeding and diet, and synthesis of studies on marine pelecypods from Tomales Bay, California. The Veliger 10 (1): 72-76 (1 July 1967) MertTEs, Davip 1962. Summary of various salinity determinations from To- males Bay during the periods from Dec. 3, 1960 to Jan. 27, 1962. Unpubl. Rep. Pacific Marine Station OLprRoyp, IpA SHEPARD 1924. ‘The marine shells of the west coast of North America. Stanford Univ. Publ. Geol. Sci., 1: 1 - 247; plts. 1-57 Packarp, Ear L. 1918. A quantitative analysis of the molluscan fauna of San Francisco Bay. Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool. 18 (13): 236 to 299 Pearce, Jack B. 1965. On the distribution of Tresus nuttalli and Tresus capax (Pelecypoda: Mactridae) in the waters of Puget Sound and the San Juan Archipelago. The Veliger 7 (3): 166-170; plt. 27; 1 text fig. (1 January 1965) Pratt, Davin M. 1953. | Abundance and growth of Venus mercenaria and Callo- cardia morrhuana in relation to the character of bottom sedi- ments. Journ. Mar. Res. 12: 60 - 74 Pratt, Davin M. « D. A. CAMPBELL 1956. Environmental factors affecting Venus mercenaria. Limnolog. « Oceanogr. 1: 2 - 17 ReisH, Donatp J. 1961. A study of a benthic fauna in a recently constructed boat harbor in southern California. Ecology 42: 84 - 91. Ricketts, Epwarp FE « Jack CaLviIN 1962. Between Pacific tides. 34 ed., rev. by J. W. HepcPeTH xili+502 pp.; illust. Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, Calif. SIEGEL, SIDNEY FE 1956. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill series in psychology, New York, pp. 1 - 312 Swan, Emery FREDERICK 1952. ‘The growth of the clam Mya arenaria as affected by the substratum. Ecology 33 (4): 530 - 534 WELLs, Harry W. 1957. Abundance of the hard clam Mercenaria mercenaria in relation to environmental factors. Ecology 38: 123 - 128 Page 250 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 Studies on the Mytilus edulis Community in Alamitos Bay, California. - IV. Seasonal Variation in Gametes from Different Regions in the Bay DONALD R. MOORE DONALD J. REISH Department of Biology, California State College at Long Beach, California 90804 (5 Text figures; 1 Table) INTRODUCTION THE BAY MUSSEL, Mytilus edulis LINNAEUS, 1758, is distributed throughout Alamitos Bay, California (Figure 1). It is especially abundant wherever floating boat docks occur, but in the upper reaches of the bay, notably Colorado Lagoon and Cerritos Channel, the number of specimens decreases. The chlorinity of the bay is uniform throughout except immediately following infrequent win- ter rains (STONE & ReisH, 1965). Since formation of the gametes and subsequent fertilization and development is essentially for repopulation, and since M. edulis is distributed throughout the bay, the authors were curious whether or not the mussels will produce gametes in all areas of their distribution in the bay, and, if so, would they be produced at the same or at different times of the year. In other words, is the reproductive population in a limited area of the bay surrounded by a vegetative, non- reproductive population of /. edulis? Gonadal tissue was examined periodically from 4 areas of the bay to de- termine whether or not seasonal differences occurred within an area and from area to area. The seasonal reproduction of Mytilus edulis has been studied in the past by the analysis of gonads (FIELp, 1922), CuipperFieLD (1953), Sucrura (1959), and by seasonal attachment of larvae by ENGLE & LOOSANOFF (1944), GraHamM & Gay (1945), CHipperFIELD (1953), and Loosanorr & Davis (1963), and ReisH (1964a). CHIPPERFIELD indicated sexually mature mussels occurred from mid-April to the end of May in British waters. Gamete maturation began when the water temperatures reached 7° C and spawning commenced while the tem- peratures were rising from 9}° to 124° C. In warmer Japanese waters, SuciurA (1959) noted gamete matura- tion occurred when the water temperature dropped to 18° C in the fall. Larval settlement took place in late spring and early summer in Connecticut (ENGLE & LoosanorF, 1944), in central California (GRAHAM & Gay, 1945), and in England (CHippEN¥FIELD, 1953). However, in Alamitos Bay larval settlement occurred in late winter and early spring when the water temperatures were not below 13° C (Reisu, 1964a). Since the previous studies on seasonal reproduction in Mytilus edulis have been carried out in more northern latitudes, the purpose of this study was to determine whether or not a seasonal variation in the maturity of the ova and sperm occurred in Alamitos Bay. An addi- tional purpose of this study was to investigate whether or not variations in the degree of intensity of reproduc- tion existed in populations from different areas of the bay. Vol. 11; No. 3 MATERIAL anp METHODS Monthly samples of Mytilus edulis were collected from 4 localities within Alamitos Bay, Long Beach, California, from November, 1964 through July, 1966 (Figure 1). Subsurface water temperatures were taken at the time of collection. Water samples were taken for chlorinity deter- minations during the first year. Since this value varies only during periods of rainfall (Stone & ReisH, 1965), Figure 1 Map of Alamitos Bay, California, showing Station Locations the chlorinity data were not included herein because they were of little significance to this report. Samples were taken from Stations 1 and 2 at the same time and at Stations 3 and 4 one or two weeks later. Stations 1, 3, and 4 represented extremes in the distri- bution of the population where sufficient numbers of specimens were present. Station 2 is in an intermediate location where earlier studies on Mytilus edulis were conducted (Reis, 1964a, 1964b). Occasional specimens occur along the rock jetty at the channel entrance and up the channel from Station 3, but there was not a sufficient number of specimens to permit analysis. All mussels were collected from floating boat docks; thus, the specimens were always covered with water. The specimens were brought back to the laboratory to ascertain the degree of gamete development. Smears THE VELIGER Page 251 were made of gonadal tissues, and the classification sys- tem of CuippERFIELD (1953) was followed as: Stage 0. Sex unknown (indeterminate); no follicles present. Stage 1. Follicles present; sperm mother cells and sper- matids present; a few small oocytes scen. Stage 2. Sperm present, but not motile; ova not fully developed, wrinkled, and would not become spher- ical when placed in sea water; no fertilization. Stage 3. Sperm motile; ova fully developed and be- came spherical when placed in sea water; ferti- lization. Recent spent stage: A few residual gametes left in follicles. Ten individuals of each sex were selected for micro- scopic examination of gonadal smears. Mature males could be distinguished by the cream or yellowish-cream colored gonads, and mature females by their apricot or red-brown colored gonads. The colors of the gonads were light orange or light yellow in stages 1 and 2 of both sexes. Gonadal smears were made of each speci- men and the stage of development was noted. A separate count of indeterminates or recently spent mussels was made. An average stage of gamete development was calcu- lated for each male and female each month by totalling the figures for the different stages observed and dividing the number of individuals examined. The number of indeterminates was totalled separately. DATA The data for the seasonal variation in male and female gamete development over the 20-month period of obser- vation are presented in Table 1 and Figures 2 to 5. The range and average stage of gametogenesis for each sex are presented by date for the 4 stations in Table 1. The data are summarized graphically by station for each sex for each period of observation as the average stage of gamete development. These averages are based on 10 specimens of each sex except when a large number of indeterminates was encountered. The number of inde- terminates and the water temperature are also included in each graph. The data show that some degree of gametogenesis occurred in both sexes to a greater or lesser extent at all stations throughout the entire period of observation from November 1964 through July 1966. However, the degree of gametogenesis fluctuated seasonally in both males and females. The higher levels of gamete development were observed during the late fall and early winter months. Page 252 Mussels with mature gametes decreased in numbers from March to the end of July each year. The greatest num- ber of indeterminates was observed from May to October. SEASONAL VARIATION IN MALE GAMETOGENESIS Mature sperm were present in some specimens at all 4 stations throughout the period of observation except at Station 2 in March and April 1965 and at station 4 in July 1966 (Table 1). However, a seasonal variation in the average stage of gamete development occurred at all stations, and, furthermore, variations in the degree of gamete maturity from station to station were noted (Fig- ures 2 to 5). A total of 68 samples was taken from all stations during the 20 months of study; of these 14 (or 21%) THE VELIGER Vol Gi Nors of the samples of males were composed entirely of mussels at stage 3 of gamete development. Six of these 14 samples were observed at Station 1, 3 each at Stations 2 and 3, and 2 at Station 4. Only 3 samples, or 4%, of the 68 samples did not have any individuals at stage 3 of gamete development. The overall average stage of male gamete development was 2.6, 2.5, 2.5, and 2.4 for Sta- tions | to 4, respectively. The length of time during which the average gamete stage of development was high (over 2.5) and longer was at Stations 1 and 2. An inverse relationship between the male gamete stage and water temperature was observed at all stations (Fig- ures 2 to 5). The low point in the average stage of male gamete development occurred from the months of March to August when the water temperature rose from 17° C to 24°C. The high point in the average stage of male gamete development occurred from October to February when the water temperature dropped from 24° to 13° C. Table 1 Seasonal Changes in the Stages of Gamete Development in Males and Females of Mytilus edulis Based on a Numerical Scale of | to 3! Date Station 1 Station 2 Station 3 Station 4 Males _- Females Males Females Males Females Males Females oO o o o o o Bos) Css ee SB 88 See [a4 < ew < fa <= < a4 we Experimental Are: IRS Pacific Ocean Map of the Flood Control Channel in San Diego, California observed under water that individuals are carried fairly long distances by the currents if the animals become dis- lodged. Nevertheless, it must be assumed that some active travelling does occur as all captured animals, marked and unmarked alike, were returned after examination in one small area of less than a square meter. ‘These artificially created densitics of populations —_ several thousand individuals per square meter — would prob- ably cause the individuals to seek less densely populated feeding grounds. The FCC was, however, not without disadvantages. Since it is a flood control channel, at times of extremely heavy winter rains there is a very heavy run-off of fresh water, and though fresh water may tend to form a layer above the sea water it will, nevertheless, tend to kill off many of the animals living in the upper portions of the sand exposed or nearly exposed at low tide. Such extreme- ly heavy rainfalls do not occur often in the San Diego area and during the term of our observations there only two such events took place, both times with -— for the purposes of this study -— catastrophic results. Another disadvantage of the FCC for the study is its accessibility to the pleasure fishermen and their families. The children pick up the rather attractive shells of Oli- vella biplicata and carry them away. However, the worst case was that of a “shell jewelry” collector who scooped up many thousands of Olivella animals exactly in the ex- perimental area. These untoward occurrences are re- flected in the tables, to be discussed below, by the small numbers of animals gathered on various occasions. The entire study was carried out over a period of 9 years, from July 27, 1959 to July 13, 1968. The area was visited every 3 months and strenuous efforts were made to recover as many marked individuals as possible. ‘This Vole INow3 required the participation of several to many individuals and it is a great pleasure to acknowledge the enthusiastic participation of many persons; it would hardly be fair to single out any individual for special thanks, except per- haps a few who participated at every “Olivella Dive’; among these are Mrs. Fay Wolfson, Mr. and Mrs. R. Dilworth and, later, practically all the members of the San Diego Shell Club and at one time or another, mem- bers of various SCUBA diving clubs from the San Diego region. Without this help, it would have been impossible to carry out this study since one individual could not possibly hope to collect, even under the best conditions, the number of individuals obtained on the different oc- casions. To all these persons go my sincere thanks. MATERIAL ann METHODS The species used for the investigation reported here is Olivella biplicata (SoweERBy, 1825). As described earlier (STOHLER, 1962), the animals were collected first at 1960 (226) 16.0 - 18.0 mm VANS 1961 II (347) (316) (167) 18.1 - 20.0 mm 14.1 - 16.0 mm 16.1 - 18.0 mm (964) 14.1- 16.0 mm ») 1967 IX (1005) 15.5 - 16.0 mm THE VELIGER IV Page 261 Solana Beach, a few miles north of San Diego; later, the collections were made at Shelter Island in San Diego Harbor by members of the San Diego Shell Club. Until measured, selected and marked, the snails were main- tained in large tanks with running sea water in the ex- perimental aquarium of Scripps Institution of Oceano- graphy at La Jolla. The method of measuring and mark- ing was given in an earlier paper (STOHLER, 1962). Other methods of marking had been tried, as stated in the earlier report, and found unsuitable. Tagging with discs, permitting individual numbering, as described by Darsy (1964) for Tegula funebralis (A. ApAMs, 1855) was deemed highly desirable from the point of view that this method would be capable of yielding accurate re- sults, but was considered unsatisfactory because the pro- truding tags would interfere with normal activities of the marked snails and thereby possibly affect growth rate and life span. To obtain simultaneously data for several stages in the growth series of Olivella, the animals in 1961 were di- (70) 20.1 - 22.0 mm 22.1 - 23.0 mm 23.1 - 24.0 mm Numbers in parentheses indicate number of individuals marked for that size class. Roman numerals refer to the corresponding column in Table 10. Figure 1 Marks used in different years and for different size classes Page 262 vided into different size classes and marked diffcrently (see Figure 1). After the heavy rains of December 1964 this particular series was forcibly terminated. In 1965 I returned to the marking of a single size class, but to offset the predation by sea gulls and removal by human beings I used almost 1000 individuals. When this partic- ular experiment again was terminated by the heavy rains of 1966, I selected for the final attempt in 1967 a much more limited size class, spanning not more than 4mm, while previously the size classes comprised all individuals within a 2mm range. This last selection was made pos- sible by the enormous number of specimens collected by members of the San Diego Shell Club. It was possible to select over 1000 individuals in the size range 15.5 to 16.0 mm, with a majority measuring exactly 15.5 mm. Although I did not keep a count of the total number, I think close to 25000 animals were collected; from these the experimental group was selected. Of course, as al- ways, the unused animals were returned to their original habitat and the marked ones were deposited in the ex- perimental area in the FCC. THE VELIGER Table 1 oO 43) wr) — u = i) @ S ye ies ou oO. oO. So a 2 Se ee ae a we ay £e Gey Bi 77 Ss + N © -Q Ss 6} (S| g so es me q g 5... § a S oC Z 7p) —] a 1960 XI 5 5 {18.6 } {20.25} {19.07} x6 2 (BE GO” } KO23) 18:6 20.25 19.14 1961 I 28 7 17.8 21.9 20.01 IV 22 4 17.7 20.9 19.1 VII 4 6 17.6 19.7 18.53 xX 14 0 1962 i 6 2 19.3 20.1 19.7 IV 14 3 18.5 25.0 20.83 VII 12 2 19:2 21.0 20.01 x © 0 1963 It iS 1 22.52 IV 6 1 20.9 VII 21 4 20.18 25.55 23.11 MS 5 0) starting date: 16 VII 1960 226 individuals marked starting sizes: 16.0 mm to 18.0 mm minimum increment 2.18 mm to 4.18 mm maximum increment 9.55 mm to 7,55 mm Vol. 11; No. 3 RESULTS The results are summarized in the 11 Tables that follow. General explanation for the tables: Because of the range in each size class (2 mm in the case of Tables 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 8; 1 mm in that of Tables 6 and 7; and 4mm in that of Table 8) minimum and maximum increments given at the foot of each Table are cited with these be- ginning ranges reflected in the end results. In Table 1, separate recovery collections were made on 2 successive days and the results computed separately; these are re- corded brackets in { } in the Table, with the total from both days following in the appropriate columns. Because of the possibility of adversely affecting the marked ani- mals by keeping them overnight in an aquarium, no more collections were made on successive days thereafter. Table 1: Of the 226 individuals marked in 1960 only 4 were recaptured after 3 years. Because of the initial size range of 2.0 mm an accurate measurement of the total increment is impossible. However, it is possible to state that Olivella biplicata grew not less than 2.18 mm nor more than 9,55 mm in the 3 years. It is noteworthy, how- ever, that at least one individual had attained almost the final size as much as 14 years earlier. Table 2 - Bs =, 5 BS E a 2 Se Le 2 Se se ie eI . Ba ae 2 eae aoe d A Ze Ss = 1961 XxX 14 13 15.4 19.2 Ad 1962 I 6 3 17.8 19.1 18.46 IV 14 7 17.4 20.4 18.72 VII 12 7 17.9 Diol 20.24 xX 6 8 18.8 22.7 20.54 1963 I 13 5 22.8 23.9 23.49 IV 6 8 19.0 25.2 22.53 VII 21 10 19.6 26.8 22.64 x5 4 Di 2) 23.6 22.5 1964 1965 1966 VII 9 1 24.9 1967 Ihy 2 1 27.8 starting date: 3/4 VII 1961 347 individuals marked starting sizes: 14.1 mm to 16.0 mm minimum increment 11.8 mm maximum increment 13.7 mm Vol. 11; No. 3 THE VELIGER Page 263 Table 2: Of the 347 individuals marked in 1961, one Table 4 was recovered as much as 53 years later and had, by that time, attained almost the maximum size (31.2 mm) ‘ "al nae reported for Olivella biplicata (STOHLER, 1960). = 5 5 ‘g Table 3: This group was of some interest because for e e 28 = 2 almost 2 years no member of this size class was recovered ; fe & ol = = = yet, when at the end of 4 years one specimen was found, i § Ks 9 z I = it had grown less in this total time than one other speci- © Be oo I men had in one year. A 7 & 5 = 1961 X 14 3 20.1 20.8 24.43 Table 3 1962 I 6 2 21.4 22.0 2ilied IV 14 5 20.7 (ep 21.42 mae ar VII 12 1 2353 e = s S x © 1 24.0 2 8) ol eles 1963 1S | Bit BD Bi Pare. § SS ee NY Gi Ge Le ee Ee ‘s Bet oa f=) 9A, VII 21 3 2319 25.8 24.63 5 se Oe ae P Kee re 24.6 S ERTS ee er S 1964 WII 5 1 22.3 fa Za 4 a i561 X 14 74 198 18.96 starting date: 3/4 VII 1961 : 90.2 167 individuals marked 5) ae 2 © l starting sizes: 18.1 mm to 20.0 mm IV 14 2 IS) 21.0 20.45 aes ‘ Sian minimum increment (last captured individ.) 2.3 mm WADTeptr2 3 21.0 25.8 22.83 : : Nerene maximum increment (last captured individ.) 4.2 mm 2S © ‘ Wed Lis) al maximum increment (any individual) 7.7 mm to 5.8 1963 I 13 2 2p DB) 24.3 aa EV 16 2 235ml 2323 Def VII 21 5 Dee 24.3 23.42 ieee Table 5 N9G5 ee WALT 24 1 23.6 starting date: 3/4 VII 1961 v 2 3 = 316 individuals marked 2 fe ao) = 0 0 Q. jor ae) =O starting sizes: 16.1 mm to 18.0mm aS s ao 2 oO maximum increment (any indiv.) 9.7 mm to 7.8 mm g & Je 5 = = minimum increment (last captured individ.) 5.5 mm ‘ g % S z 3s Bs maximum increment (last captured individ.) 7.5 mm c E |x 5p a S 5 E a ~ a) Zz, Nn — a Table 4: Again one individual recovered after 3 years 1961 X 14 1 21.6 had grown less than one other individual had grown in 1962 I 6 0 one year. IV 14 1 22a WANE WP 0 Table 5: This group and the next yielded the poorest XenG 1 25.8 results. Because of a peculiar mark caused by a slip as 1963 I 13 0 the shell was pressed against the marking drill, the indi- ay & 0 vidual animal was recognized; unfortunately, an oppor- VII 21 1 95.9 tunity to obtain exact results was missed in this instance. == = = I did not anticipate the possibility of recapturing exactly starting date: 3/4 VII 1961 the same individual 4 times at various intervals and ther- 70 individuals marked fore did not record the individual size of the one where starting sizes: 20.1 mm to 22.0 mm the shell had slipped. Thus, the animal whose measure- minimum increment 3.9 mm ments are recorded in ‘Table 5 may havc been as small as maximum increment 5.8 mm Page 264 20.1 mm when marked but could not have been more than 21.6 mm. However, it attained almost its maximum size within the first 18 months. Table 6: Only one individual of 26 originally marked was recovered after 14 years. In that time it had not grown more than 14mm. Table 6 e 2 OS = Z 2 oe ee < s 22 38 9 © E5 a5 = =) om rv & =F ‘S & be fa © I = x 5p & q a 5 & o fa Ze =] = 1961 xX 14 3 22.1 23.7 23.3 1962 li © 1 23.6 starting date: 3/4 VII 1961 26 individuals marked Starting sizes: 22.1 mm to 23.0 mm minimum increment 0.6 mm maximum increment (any individual) 1.6 mm maximum increment (last captured individ.) 1.5 mm Table 7: In this group we again find that one individual attained in one year a greater length than another in 9 more months. Table 7 @ o° S ra 3 i es) 2 Se ee Be Be © So Ee Ee % Be ae g ¢ de is ; A 2 &§ 4 s 1961 xX 14 4 24.1 24.4 24.75 1962 I 6 0 IV 14 OAD 95,5 94.7 VII 12 DDG 26.6 25,65 x 6G 1 26.3 1963 I 13 2 | OBO 26.3 95.75 IV 6 1 24.5 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 Table 8: This group was subjected to the effects of one extremely heavy rainfall runoff and one fairly heavy one. Yet one individual survived both of these catastrophes. The lone survivor had added in 3 years a maximum of 11.2 mm to its length. Table 8 0 i) = 5 3. 5 a Qa So 255) § Bu sh ee S 2 &3 ES Ge w wy A, “= Oy } ® o8 2 S L G& AR bn 5 3 5 g a x a) ZS 4 a 1965 VII 24 10 14.8 19.8 17.4 Xl, 16 15.3 21.4 18.37 1966 I 15 0 IV 17 3 16.9 20.6 19.17 VII 9 4 16.9 19.6- 18.23 ee 115) 6 18.0 21.6 18.22 1967 1968 VII 13 1 DP) starting date: 10/12 I 1965 964 individuals marked starting sizes: 14.1 mm to 16.0 mm minimum increment 9.2 mm maximum increment 11.2 mm Table 9: In some respects this was the most disappointing experiment. Of the very large number (1005) of experi- Table 9 Smallest individual recaptured Largest individual recaptured | Date of recapture a — [op) nN —_ “I 1S) — Dn ~I on 1967 1968 I 113) IV 6 13 170 19.8 VIL 13 16 15.6 20.6 © ~| Number recaptured starting date: 3/4 VII 1961 109 individuals marked starting sizes: 23.1 mm to 24.0 mm minimum increment 0.5 mm to 1.4 mm maximum increment 3.5mm to 2.6 mm starting date: 11/13 VII 1967 1005 individuals marked starting sizes: 15.5 mm to 16.0 mm minimum increment 0.1 mm maximum increment 5.1 mm to 4.6 mm Vol. 11; No. 3 THE VELIGER Page 265 Table 10 Minimum and Maximum sizes At Six Months Intervals I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX (226) (347) (316) (167) (70) (26) (109) (964) (1005 ) 14.0-16.0 14.1-16.0 16.1-18.0 18.1-20.0 20.1-22.0 22.1-23.0 23.1-24.0 14.1-16.0 15.5-16.0 6 mo 17.6 21.9 17.8 19.1 20.2 21.4 22.0 - 23.6 = 14.6 19.8 = 12 mo 7a Wa gS) Bile Pil Pos 23.3 - ~ 24.7 26.6 — 15.6 20.6 18 mo 19.3 20.1 22.8 23.9 23.1 25.5 21.2 24.7 - _ 25.2 26.3 16.9 19.6 24 mo 19.2 21.0 19.6 26.8 22.2 24.3 23.9 25.8 25.9 = = = 30 mo 22.5 - - = = - - — 36 mo 20.2 22.6 - - 22.3 = = = = 42 mo = = - - - - - 252. 48 mo = — 23.6 = - — = 54 mo = = - - - — = 60 mo = 27.8 - - - — - The Roman numerals at the heads of the columns refer to the preceding 9 Tables. Numbers in parentheses indicate the numbers of individuals marked in each size group. The third line in the column headings indicates the respective size ranges for each class. mental animals only very small numbers were recovered on subsequent dives. Still, because of the narrowness of the initial size range, the results seem to me to have some value. One individual could not possibly have grown more than one tenth of one millimeter in a full year, while another could not have grown more than 5.1 mm. Table 10: I have attempted to summarize the results presented in the first 9 Tables, listing the maxima and minima attained at 6 months intervals. In columns VIII and IX the heavy line indicates the termination of the study on July 13, 1968; for all other columns the bottom line represents the final date. In this representation the columns II through VII, including all the size classes of the experiment started in 1961, present an especially interesting picture. Each size class had last representatives (1 or more) at shorter and shorter intervals; this could lead one to assume that in the FCC Olivella biplicata dies when it has attained what Table 11 Size Increases in Pooled Size Classes {1537} {316} (14.0-16.0) (16.1-18.0) 1 yr 17.6-21.7 21.0-25.8 2 ys 19.2-26.8 22.2—24.3 3 ys 20.2-22.6 - 4 ys - 23.6 5 ys 27.8 minimum and maximum increments at yearly intervals (in millimeters) 1 yr 1.6—7.7 3.0 — 9.7 2 ys 3.2-12.8 4.2-8.2 3 ys 4.2-8.6 — 4 ys — 5.6—7.5 5 ys {167} {70} {109} S200) (ON 2 220) en (2341-2420) 23.3 = 24.7-26.6 23.9-25.8 25.9 22.3 BGM = 0.7-35 S914) 3.95.8 VRAD 11.8-13.8 = Page 266 THE VELIGER Vol iisNows appears to be its maximum size here, i.e. ca. 26 to 28 mm. Yet on April 22, 1961 an unmarked specimen meas- uring 29.3 mm was found, indicating that in FCC Olivel- la might attain as large a size as it does elsewhere and that the 26 to 28 mm size is not the absolute maximum. The possible explanation for the disappearance of the “Jarge” specimens from the FCC may have to be sought in the selective collecting by the shell jewelers. Special mention may be made of the specimen listed in column JI. It had survived 5 full years since the marking. Table 11: This Table was compiled by pooling all results for each of the 5 different size classes used, in an attempt to uncover possible general trends. DISCUSSION Darsy (1964) showed that in Tegula funebralis from Sunset Bay, Oregon age can be estimated on the basis of growth lines visible on the underside of the body whorl. In the collection of the Department of Zoology, Univer- sity of California in Berkeley, there is a large series of the same species from many localities in California. Close examination of these specimens reveals the presence of the “small” incremental lines but does not show any of the “larger” lines which Darsy equates to annual growth lines, except in a few exceptionally large speci- mens from Duxbury Reef. On the other hand, among an almost equally large series of T. brunnea (Putippt, 1848) I observed growth lines of a similar nature on a speci- men from Tomales Bay, Marin County, California. I hesitate to interpret the presence of the distinct lines in Oregon material and the general absence of them in our California material as a consequence of possibly more rigorous climatic conditions in Oregon. However, DARByY’s work did alert me to the possible significance of lines on the shells of Olivella biplicata. By close examination of the specimens that I know to have spent more than one year in the FCC I hoped to discover any significant lines. But there is no regularity in the lines discernible. The general shell pattern is almost devoid of macroscopically visible distinct lines and the few very distinct lines that may be observed on an occasional individual either have an irregular course or are so irregularly spaced that it is hard to conceive of them as “annual” growth lines. The irregularly shaped lines would seem to me to be an indi- cation of a repaired lip and the irregularly spaced lines might be indicative of fluctuations in diet. It cannot be denied, of course, that the growth lines could give a clue to the age of the individual. Unfortunately, our overall knowledge of the biology of O. biplicata at present is in- sufficient to answer this question. It seems clear from a study of the various Tables that different individuals of Olivella biplicata in the FCC grow at different rates. The greatest increase in size in one year is a possible 9.7 mm (from 16.1 to 25.8mm), while the smallest is a possible 0.1 mm (or, conceivably, 0.0 mm). It would be interesting to know if the differences in growth rates are due to the sex of the individuals con- cerned. No attempt had been made to determine the sex of the individuals to be marked as this would have required too much time. Dr. D.C. Edwards was kind enough on the occasion of one of the “Olivella dives” to show me his method of ascertaining the sex of an indi- vidual; but even with his considerable experience it took an average of 10 minutes per specimen. The most interesting specimen of the entire series is the one originally marked in July 1961 and recovered in April 1967. In the intervening 5 years and 9 months this animal almost doubled in size. Another specimen of al- most equal interest is the one included in Table 9, for which a possible increment of 0.1 mm in one full year was reported. Epwarps (1968) reports that Olivella biplicata ma- tures sexually at about the time the shell attains a length of 16mm. It would seem then, if this holds true for O. biplicata in the San Diego region, that I picked out, with one exception, sexually mature individuals for marking. The consideration for picking the particular sizes was, however, one of convenience in handling and marking. The only exception was the group reported in Table 2. In this case 347 individuals (perhaps) not yet sexually ma- ture were marked; yet within 3 months they had appar- ently attained a size at which sexual maturity may be presumed. It may appear reasonable to allow a lapse of 2 or possibly 3 years, at the most, for O. biplicata to arrive at a sexually mature stage from the veliger stage. But this relatively narrow limit need not really apply when the fact that one individual did not grow more than 0.1 mm in one year is taken into account. It then becomes possible to assume with some degree of justification that the sex- ually mature stage is not reached before 4, 5, or more years after metamorphosis. When this figure is added to the actually observed time in the one specimen, i.e. 5 years, an estimate of a total life span, under ordinary conditions, of 8 to 12 years would not appear exagger- ated; and under exceptionally favorable conditions per- haps an even longer life span may be expected. This does not appear exorbitant in the light of the estimates of 30 years, more or less, for Tegula funebralis made by Darsy (1964). Vol. 11; No. 3 THE VELIGER Page 267 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS In addition to the many individuals who have contributed numerous hours in swimming, diving, or otherwise col- lecting the experimental animals, I owe gratitude to Dr. E. W. Fager who repeatedly made all the facilities of his laboratory available to me for measuring and marking of the shells as well as for maintaining the animals prior to, during and immediately after the marking procedure. The Department of Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, supported the study throughout the several years. Dr. Cadet Hand critically read the manuscript and Mrs, Emily Reid drew the map and the text figure accompanying this paper. LITERATURE CITED Darsy, RicHarp L. 1964. On growth and longevity in Tegula funebralis (Mollus- ca: Gastropoda) . The Veliger 6, Supplement: 6-7; pit. 1. (15 November 1964) Epwarps, DALLas CRAIG 1968. Reproduction in Olivella biplicata. The Veliger 10 (4): 297 - 304; plt. 44; 3 text figs. (1 April 1968) Keen, A. Myra 1937. An abridged check list and bibliography of west North American marine Mollusca. Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, Calif.; pp. 1 - 88; 2 figs. (29 September 1937) STOHLER, RUDOLF 1959. Studies on mollusk populations: IV. The Nautilus 73 (2): 65-72; 3 text figs. 1960. Studies on mollusk populations: IV. The Nautilus 73 (3): 95 - 103 1962. Preliminary report on growth studies in Olivella bipli- cata. The Veliger 4 (3): 150-151; plt. 36 (1 Jan. 1961) ZELL, CLARACE PLUMB Bock 1955. The morphology and general histology of the repro- ductive system of Olivella biplicata (SowERByY), with a brief description of mating behavior. Univ. Calif., Berkeley, M.A. Thesis Page 268 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 Distribution of Organic Bromine Compounds in Aplysia californica Cooper, 1863 LINDSAY R. WINKLER College of the Desert, Palm Desert, California 92260 (1 Text figure) INTRODUCTION THE EXISTENCE OF organic bromine compounds in the lipids of Aplysia kurodai Baza, 1937 was first noted during routine studies of marine organisms by TANAKA & ToryAMA (1959). This report led indirectly to the pres- ent exploratory study to determine the presence and dis- tribution of bromine-containing organic compounds in the California species, Aplysia californica Cooper, 1863. The work of TANAKA & ToyAMA was introduced to the non-Japanese speaking world by an article on the chemical structure of 2 of the compounds by YAMAMURA & Hirata (1963). In the first sentence of this latter report the authors state “. . . but it is our experience that the kind and content of bromo-compounds in A fly- sia kurodai depends on when and where they were gathered.” Since bromo-synthesization is rare in animal metabolism the origin and function of such compounds might be of interest. As a sequel to this and other papers (WINKLER, 1959 and 1961; WINKLER & Dawson, 1963) an unsuccessful attempt to locate a biological precursor for these bromine- containing organic compounds in the sea weed Ploca- mium pacificum (KyLIN) was reported by DarLinc & Coscrove (1966). Search of the recent botanical literature revealed ar- ticles by a number of authors who reported the presence of organic bromine compounds in a number of species of the red algae. The most recent paper is that of Craicig & Gruenic (1967), which, together with one by Hopckin, Craicie, « McInnes (1966) has bibliograph- ic references to most extant algal papers on the subject. Among the red algae containing bromine organic com- pounds reported by these authors were listed members of the genus Laurencia, previously noted as the major dietary item of some specimens of Aplysia californica (WINKLER & Dawson, 1963). The previously mentioned paper by YAMAMURA & HI- RATA employed the term ‘aplysin’ in several combinations to denote the bromine-containing lipids of Aplysia ku- rodai. This term, however, had previously been employed to refer to a different, water-soluble toxin found in the digestive gland of A. californica (WINKLER, 1961 and 1962). As a result of this duplication of terminology, the term ‘organo-bromines’ is used in the present paper to avoid confusion. MATERIALS ann METHODS The previous Japanese papers reported only on extracts made from entire, dried animals. However, previous ex- ploratory work by the present writer has indicated that the digestive gland was a main locus of lipids in Aplysia. Preliminary studies of digestive gland lipids made on celite columns led to the isolation of apolar fractions giv- ing the Beilstein test for halogens. With this assurance of halogen content the determination of relative content of bromine in the various organs was begun using a semi- quantitative paper chromatographic technique adapted for the purpose. Animals were collected at La Jolla and Doheny Beach, California. Specimens were killed and dissected in the laboratory under hypothermia and were usually di- vided into the following parts: digestive gland, digestive tract (including oral capsule), kidney, glandular mantle margin, opaline gland, and the foot including total body wall and dermis. Each organ was minced finely with scis- sors and placed in the thimble of a flask-type lipid extrac- tor and after thorough extraction with acetone the residue was removed, dried, and weighed. After the acetone had beenremoved from the extract inacurrent of air, the ex- tract was cleansed of hydrophilic residues, after which it too was weighed and the resultant 2 weights for each or- Vol. 11; No. 3 THE VELIGER Page 269 gan were added together to give the total dry weight. The extract was then subjected to sodium fusion after which the sodium salts produced were taken up in water, fil- tered, and reduced to a quantity equivalent to the gram weight of the extracted material, or multiples of that weight if the amount was too small for convenient dilu- tion or too much NaOH was present as a result of ex- cess sodium being used during the sodium fusion. Chromatograms made of 648 inch sheets of What- man No. | filter paper were spotted along a line drawn 4inch from one of the long edges of the paper with 0.005 ml aliquots of the solution resultant from the so- dium fusions. The papers were then formed into cylin- ders, stapled, and stood in self-supporting position in petri dishes containing the developing solvent. Each was then covered with a gallon-capacity mayonnaise jar dur- ing the development period. The developer giving best separation between bromine and chlorine was pyridine and water (90:10). After drying on an histological slide warmer the spots on the chromatograms were made visible by one of 2 methods. The first method involved a silver nitrate spray followed by a 20 minute exposure to fluorescent room lighting. The removal of excess silver nitrate was accomplished by a wash in a weak nitric acid solution and a water rinse. The alternate method involved the use of a spray modified from FrEicy (1958) made up of equal parts of glacial acetic acid, 30% hydrogen peroxide and 5% uramine (sodium fluorescein). After spraying, the chromatograms were placed on the slide warmer set at maximum temperature of 65° C and dried. The bright red color of eosin was formed wherever bromine was present. After thorough airing, such chro- matograms were made “permanent” by spraying several times with ‘Krylon’ plastic spray. These chromatograms are still bright after 9 months. While this method was very specific for bromine, care was required in order to prevent running of the water-soluble eosin dye. It was consequently somewhat less accurate for quantitative estimation than the less specific silver nitrate method which depended entirely upon rf value for the final identification of the spots. In order to obtain the degree of quantitation required each chromatogram was dried and the limits of the spots were outlined with heavy pencil lines. The sheet was then imprinted with a rubber stamp having } inch quadran- gular rulings. The number of squares counted within each spot outline provided a close estimate of the relative area of each spot. A standard curve was prepared by spotting chromato- grams with 0.005 ml of standard dilutions of sodium bromide, using 4 spots for each dilution. The areas of the 4 spots were averaged and the resulting figures were plot- ted against quantity of bromine (not NaBr) actually present. The resulting curve became the standard from which quantitative estimates of the unknown spots were determined. Experimental results were read from this curve in grams of bromine in a 100 gram sample. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS Table 1 summarizes the amounts of bromine found in the various organs of a single small specimen taken from La Jolla, California, in February 1966. Figure 1 illustrates Table 1 Sample Analysis of Bromine Distribution by the Silver Nitrate Method. Results represent average values on five chromatographic determin- ations for each tissue. Averages of four determinations for each organ using the uramine/eosin method gave similar results but the variability between runs was greater. o 2 S = de =) cole : © 8 g 3 Ep) eae Fea Organ Ee eee es Bb « 8 fal 2A o QO. Ss Digestive gland 4.89 1.64 11.6 12.8 Body wall and dermis 6.65 2.74 0.2 5.48 Anterior digestive tract 1.12 0.20 Neg Mantle margin 0.18 0.13 Neg. Opaline gland 0.74 0.13 Neg. Kidney 0.32 0.08 0.45 0.36 Total dry weight 13.9 gm 4.92 gm Dermis ' 0.114gm 0.02gm _ Trace Blood ! 6 ml Trace ' Results from different animals the percentage of the total bromine found in each organ in which it was demonstrable as well as the lipid distri- bution in those organs. Other specimens taken on the same collection trip and on subsequent trips to Doheny Beach, California, indicated similar levels of bromine. The levels given for blood and dermis represent runs on blood and on skin scrapings from other individuals. Amounts of extract from these samples were insufficient, however, for successful quantitation. Page 270 1 Lip Br SS —._—-—_— ~~ Digestive Kidney Body Wall Gland Complex Figure 1 Graphic representation of the percentage of the total bromine- organic compounds (Br) and lipids (Lip) in each organ in which measurable amounts were found. Though the total quantity of lipids was considerably greater in the body wall complex the organo-bromides were found in relatively small quantities compared with the reverse situation in the digestive gland. DISCUSSION ann CONCLUSION While bromine was clearly identified by rf value when using the silver nitrate method, the specific reaction of bromine with uramine to form the red dye eosin was a further proof of its identity. The latter reaction appeared quite spectacular against the yellow background of ur- amine (sodium fluorescein) and even more pronounced when viewed under long-wave ultraviolet light. Since no color reaction was produced with chlorides when this method was used, it was possible to use the less odorifer- ous ethanol: water (diluted 90:10) as a developer. This latter developer produced a nicer, rounder spot but this was too close to the chloride spot for use when silver nitrate (which was equally good as a chloride revealer) was used for visualization. The uramine/eosin method THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 was less satisfactory for quantitative work, however, due to running of the soluble eosin produced as opposed to the highly stable spot size resulting from the use of the silver nitrate precipitation. The results of this preliminary study indicate that the digestive gland is the principal site of organic bromine compounds in the sea hare and that these materials are probably excreted by the kidney and perhaps also by the skin which has previously been suggested as an excretory organ (MacMunn, 1899; WinKLEr, 1959). These sub- stances may very well be transferred to the foot muscle by way of the blood to become one of the predation- deterrents employed by this mollusk which lacks an ex- ternal shell. Furthermore, it may be inferred that the brominated organic compounds are probably obtained from the environment rather than being the result of synthesis within the animal. The reports of various red algae containing amounts of brominated organic com- pounds and the fact that Aplysia californica is known to include at least one genus of organo-bromine producing algae in its diet (WINKLER & Dawson, 1963) along with the concentration of bromo-organic compounds in the digestive gland, makes the former hypothesis seem more plausible, especially in view of the original statement from YAMAMURA & Hirata (1963) quoted in the intro- duction to this paper. On the other hand, its concentra- tion in the digestive gland which is recognized as the normal site of great numbers of enzymatic reactions may indicate that it is there bromated as one of the various, little-undertsood, detoxification processes. The absence of the bromine compounds from the opaline gland and the mantle margin would seem to exclude the organo-bromine compounds from a part in these particular predation-deterrent systems. However, their presence in the body wall and skin may indicate that they may function to make Aplysia repulsive to potential predators. The number of specimens used in this study is admit- tedly small but is justified by the fact that the information obtainable by this method involving the destruction of the total acetone-extractable lipids is necessarily limited to what we here report — the distribution of the organic bromine fractions within the animal. Further study into the ultimate origin of the brominated compounds and their variation from animal to animal requires the frac- tionation and identification of the apolar lipids and the determination of the relative quantities of the different bromine containing fractions. Such studies. usiny more sophisticated equipment and methods, are now in the planning and development stages. Vol. 11; No. 3 THE VELIGER Page 271 SUMMARY Organs and organ systems of specimens of Aplysia cali- fornica Cooper, 1863 were dissected out and extracts were made with acetone. The residues after removal of the acetone were subjected to sodium fusion. The result- ant sodium salt was then taken up in water and semi- quantitatively estimated by paper chromatography. Re- sults indicated over 90% of the bromine-containing or- ganic compounds were to be found in the digestive gland and of the remainder more than # were found in the foot, body wall and skin complex. Less than 0.3% were found in the kidney. Trace amounts, unmeasurable by the methods used, were found in the blood or hemolymph. LITERATURE CITED CraiciE, J.S. « D. E. GRuEnic 1967. Bromophenols from red algae. Daruinc, STEPHEN D. & Ricwarp E. Coscrove 1966. Marine natural products. I. The search for Aplysia terpenoids in red algae. The Veliger 8 (3): 178 - 180. (1 January 1966) Science 157: 1058 FEIcL, Fritz 1958. Spot tests in inorganic analysis. Elsevier Publ. Co. Amsterdam, 5'* ed. Hopcxin, J.H.,J.S. Craicre « A.G. McINNEs 1966. The occurrence of 2, 3-dibromobenzyl alcohol 4, 5-di- sulfate, dipotassium salt in Polysiphonia lanosa. Canad. Journ. Chem. 44: 74 MacMunv, C. A. 1899. The pigments of Aplysia punctata. 24: 1-10 Tanaka, TATSUO & YOSHIYUKI TOYAMA 1959. ‘Fatty oils of aquatic invertebrates: XXI Fatty oil of Aplysia kurodat and its sterol components; XXII Unsaponi- fiable components other than sterols in the oil of the sea hare Aplysia kurodai. Nippon Kagaku Zasshi 8: 1326 - 1332 (in Japanese with English summary) WINKLER, LINDSAY ROBERT 1959. A mechanism of color variation operating in the west coast sea hare, Aplysia californica Cooper, Pacific Sci. 13 (1): 63 - 66; 1 text fig. 1961. Preliminary tests of the toxin extracted from California sea hares of the genus Aplysia. _ Pacific Sci. 15 (2) : 211 - 214 WINKLER, Linpsay RosBErT & E. YALE Dawson 1963. | Observations and experiments on the food habits of California sea hares of the genus Aplysia. Pacific Sci. 17 (1): Journ. Physiol. 102 - 105 WINKLER, LinpsAy Ropert, BERNARD E. TILTON & MERVYN G. HarDINGE 1962. A cholinergic agent extracted from sea hares. Arch. Internat. Pharmacodyn. Thérap. 137: 76 - 83; 5 Text figs. YAMAMURA, S. & YOSHIMASA HiraTA 1963. Structures of aplysin and aplysinol, naturally occurring bromo-compounds. Tetrahedron 19: 1485 - 1496 Page 272 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 Quantitative Relationships Between Gill Number, Respiratory Surface, and Cavity Shape in Chitons KAY M. JOHNSON | (6 Text figures) INTRODUCTION CHITONS HAVE A NUMBER of characteristics which sug- gest that they are a very primitive group of mollusks: an ovoid shape, a broad, flat foot, shells of only two layers — the tegmentum and the articulamentum — , a microphagous, herbivorous mode of feeding, a non-gang- lionated nervous system, and a trochophore larva which metamorphoses directly into the adult form. Yet, with all of these primitive characteristics they are not termed an “ancestral mollusk” type. That is largely because of the many gills found in the grooves along the sides of the foot. YoncE (1939, 1947) describes an “ancestral mollusk” with a posterior mantle cavity with only 2 gills. He believes that the chitons evolved from this ancestor due to a flattening of the animal with an extension of the pallial cavity in grooves alongside of the body. The gills were seemingly forced into multiplying in number and shortening so as to fit into the grooves. Until recently YonceE’s hypothesis was not challenged. With the discovery of Neopilina galathea LEMcHE, 1957, a doubt as to the complete validity of YoncE’s hypothesis was raised. Neopilina was obviously a very primitive mollusk with its ovoid shell, flat foot, and radula. But the most astonishing fact was that it had a series of gills along the side of the foot. To LEMcHE (1957) this was enough to prove that multiplicity of gills was the prim- itive condition of the molluscan pallial cavity and also enhanced the idea that mollusks had a segmented ances- tor. So, from LEMcHE’s hypothesis it could be concluded that the gills in chitons are arrayed like the primitive condition and that the number of gills in other groups of mollusks is a reduction. Only Hunter & Brown (1965) have tried studying the gills in chitons in an attempt to show with data just which theory might be reasonable. HUNTER & BRowN studied only the relationship between the weight-length and the number of gills. Their results showed what they considered too great an asymmetry between the number of gills on each side of animals of equal weight-length for there to be any basis for the idea that chitons are related to a segmented ancestor. And, therefore, the con- dition of the gills was not even possibly like the primitive state. In other words, they decided that the gills were a secondary replication of structures of the ‘ancestral mol- lusk’ as YoncE had hypothesized it. Hunter & Brown may have been correct in conclud- ing that the asymmetry in gill numbers may show a lack of segmentation. But that does not necessarily mean that a multiplicity of gills was not a primitive condition of - the mollusks. There are 3 groups which are very primi- tive mollusks and do have numerous gills — Neopilina, Nautilus, and the chitons. So, why could not the primi- tive condition have been a “mantle cavity as a groove bounded by the mantle edge and surrounding the head- foot rather than a posterior cavity”? (FRETTER & Gra- HAM, 1962). HunrtTeER & Brown used only 2 species, Chaetopleura apiculata (Say, 1834) and Lepidochitona cinereus (Lin- NAEuS, 1767). And they only counted the number of gills. I have sought to further clarify that picture of the chiton gill cavity by making additional measurements. MATERIALS ann METHODS Various measurements of a chiton’s gill cavity assist in portraying the gills in relation to the whole animal: (1) the length of the animal along the foot; (2) lengths of the gill series on both sides; and (3) the length of the most posterior gill itself. Also, I counted the number of gills on both sides of the animal. And by likening the effective gill surface (that which water must pass through during respiration) to a triangle I could compute that surface area by using the length of the last gill and the Vol. 11; No. 3 length of the gill series in the formula: 4bh = area of a triangle. These various measurements can be used for a descrip- tion of the gill cavities of a group of chitons with a wide range of types, sizes, and shapes. I used chitons from 2 suborders and 4 families of different adult lengths and shapes, and of a range of sizes within each species. The species I used are further described below: Acanthochitonina ACANTHOCHITONIDAE 1. Acanthochitona exquisita Pitspry, 1893, is a small (1.1 to 3.3. cm) oblong chiton. Lepidopleurina ISCHNOCHITONIDAE 1. Stenoplax (Stenoradsia) magdalenensis (Hinps, 1844) is a long (2.1 to 9.0cm), rather narrow chiton. 2. Tonicella lineata (Woop, 1815) is a small chiton (1.8 to 4.4 cm). Its general shape is a gently rounded oblong. MoPALIDAE 1. Mopalia muscosa (Goutp, 1846) is a large (1.1 to 8.1 cm) oval chiton. 2. Placiphorella velata DAL, 1879 is a small (0.9 to 2.5 cm) broad, oval, flattened chiton. CHITONIDAE 1. Chiton sulcatus Woop, 1815 is a large (0.5 to 7.5 cm) chiton which is fairly broad and oval. All of the specimens were preserved in the collection at the Department of Invertebrate Zoology, California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco. So, I tried to look at a range in sizes of each species of chiton that had come from one collecting area. In that way I could pos- sibly be working on a growth series of a species. There- fore, I chose the following lots: 100 Acanthochitona exquisita from Puerto Refugio, An- gel de la Guarda Island, Gulf of California; 25 Stenoplax magdalenensis from Punta Abreojos, Baja California; 92 Tonicella lineata from False Bay, San Juan Island, Puget Sound, Washington; 20 Placiphorella velata from Cedros Island, Mexico; 40 Chiton sulcatus from near and in Academy Bay, Santa Cruz Island, Galapagos Islands. Mopalia muscosa was the exception. The Academy did not have a large number of animals from any one place. Therefore I took groups which had been collected along the range of this species. Thus, 17 M7. muscosa were from RE WWEEIGER Page 273 False Bay, Washington; 8 from near San Simeon, Cali- fornia; and 10 from one mile north of Camalu Arroyo near Guerrero, Baja California. RESULTS Just as HUNTER & Brown (1965) showed in Chaeto- pleura and Lepidochitona, there is an asymmetry of the right and left sides in the chitons studied. It is evident when one compares the average number of gills per side with the length of an animal, that the right and left sides are not similar. Growth seems to be random. This is easily seen by comparing the gill numbers on either side of Tonicella lineata in Figures 1 and 2. Thus, it appears that HUNTER « BRown’s work is correct. 30 es S 28 a 2 g 3 Zz 26 24 2. 4 3 2 Length (cm) Figure 1 Graph showing the number of gills found on the right side of Tonicella lineata of different lengths. But much more is evident from my data, as may be seen in Figure 3. Those chitons which eventually reach a “large” adult size (8 to 9cm) have more gills than do those which attain only a “small” adult size (1 to 5cm). The difference is quite obvious when one compares ani- mals of the same sizes, between 0.5 and 5.0 cm, but of different adult sizes. Thus, some may have adult stages larger than 5 cm and some may not. The “large” chitons are from at least 2 species and 2 different families, yet of Gill Page 274 30 3 28. es o 2 A 06 24 tt ____—_—_1— 2.3 3 4 Length (cm) Figure 2 Graph showing the number of gills on the left side of Tonicella lincata. A comparison with Figure 1 demonstrates the lack of symmetry between the two sides. ihey possess on the average from 4 to 10 more gills per side than do the “small” chitons (which include even representatives of 2 different suborders). Thus, there is “Small Chitons ——-— “Large” Chitons ==--=-= Chiton sulcatus 50 ns Set NY ; I 2 3 4 5 Length (cm) Figure 3 chitons have more gills than “small” chitons at all lengths THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 some major difference between “large” and “small” chi- ton growth. Chitons of different adult size have the same effective gill surface per unit length. This is found by comparing the gill cavity area with the length as in Figure 4. ax BY Oo & oO ~~ 3 o ~ < ip a 2) ) .06 (0) 1.2 2 3 Length (cm) Figure 4 Both “large” and “small” chitons have equal gill surface area per unit length The difference between “large” and “small’ chitons is found when one compares the gill series lengths with the body lengths, and the length of the last gill with the length of the gill series. It appears that the length of the gill series of the “large” chitons are somewhat longer than in the “small’ chitons, even when both groups are of the same lengths (Figure 5). And the “small” chitons 2.0 “Small Chitons —— — “Large” Chitons ne / & es) Length of Last Gill (cm) 5 1.2 2 3 Length (cm) Figure 5 “Large” chitons have longer gill series than “small” chitons Vol. 11; No. 3 THE VELIGER Page 275 achieve equal gill cavity area by lengthening their gills more than the “large” chitons do (Figure 6). Thus, the most posterior gill of the “small” chitons are longer than “Small Chitons — — — “Large” Chitons Gill Series Length (cm) Length (cm) Figure 6 “Small” chitons have longer gills than “large” chitons the last gill of “large” chitons of equal length. In other words, the “small” chitons have shorter, wider gill cavi- ties than do the “large” chitons. DISCUSSION Hunter & Brown (1965) may be correct regarding the non-segmented nature of an “ancestral mollusk” type. In fact, my results seem only to support that part of their arguments. The right and left gills of chitons are never completely equal in number. Deciding that the “ancestral mollusk” was not segmen- ted does not necessarily support YoONGE’s hypothesis of a two-gilled ancestor. The additional information I have supplied about the chiton gill cavity adds a new perspec- tive to the problem. If the many gills in chitons are due to a forced multiplication of them due to the chitons’ being flattened over evolutionary history, why do “large” and “small” chitons differ? If each type, “large” and “small”, was achieved separately, why do such similar animals, as those found in the same family, have differ- ently shaped gill cavities? Thus, it seems that YONGE’s hypothesis fails to account for these differences in gill cavity shapes. A simple and more adequate explanation would be that the multiplicity of gills as seen in Neopilina or the chitons may be like the primitive condition of the mol- luscan gills. It seems much more plausible that the two trends seen in the “large” and “small” chiton gill cavities were present in the “ancestral mollusk” and have been maintained by the chitons, than that they were the result of a couple of stages of flattening of the animals. Thus, the two gills found in gastropods and lamellibranchs and the four gills in some cephalopods are most probably the product of a reduction in number of gills with an en- largement of the posterior part of the gill cavity. This reduction in the number of gills would, of course, oblit- erate the pattern of “small” and “large” animal gill areas. Therefore, it appears that the chitons have main- tained a condition found in the “ancestral mollusk” type, although more gills may have been added, since the chitons have so many more gills than does the more primitive Neopilina. SUMMARY Chitons of “large” adult size have more gills present on both sides of the animal at all sizes than do the “small” adult-size chitons. The difference in number does not affect the effective gill surface per unit length. The ef fects of the difference in number on the area of gills are equalized in the “small” chitons by possession of longer gills. Therefore, the “large” chitons have long narrow gill cavities, while the “small’ chitons have short wide gill cavities. These two trends in the chitons do not seem to be adequately explained by YonceE’s hypothesis as to the origin of the multiplicity of gills in chitons. A more ade- quate explanation is that the trends were present in some “ancestral mollusk” type and have been maintained in the chitons and in Neofilina. All other mollusks have, therefore, modified this primitive gill cavity. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank Dr. Michael T: Ghiselin of the Department of Zoology, University of California, Ber- keley, for his kind assistance throughout this project and for criticizing the manuscript. Also, I would like to thank Mr. Allyn G. Smith of the California Academy of Sciences for his help and for allowing me to use the col- lection of preserved chitons in his care. Page 276 THE VELIGER LITERATURE CITED FRETTER, VERA & ALASTAIR GRAHAM 1962. _ British prosobranch molluscs, their functional anatomy and ecology. London, Ray Soc. xvi+/55 pp.; 316 figs. Hunter, W. RusseE.i « STEPHEN C. BROWN 1965. | Ctenidial number in relation to size in certain chitons with a discussion of its phyletic significance. Biol. Bull. 128 (3): 508 - 521 (June 1965) LemMcHE, HENNING « Kart GEorG WINGSTRAND 1957. The anatomy of Neopilina galathea LemcuE, 1957 (Mollusca: Tryblidiacea) M. Galathea Rep. 3: 9-71 SmitH, ALLYN GoopwIN 1960. Amphineura Jn Treatise on invertebrate paleontology: Mollusca I 1. 41 - 84; figs. 31-50 Raymond C. Moore, ed. Univ. Kansas Press YONGE, CHARLES MAURICE 1939. On the mantle cavity and its contained organs in the Loricata (Placophora). Quart. Journ. Micro. Sci. 81 (3) : 367 - 390 (June 1939) 1947. The pallial organs in the aspidobranch gastropoda and their evolution throughout the Mollusca. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, B 232: 443 - 518 (22 April 1947) Vol. 11; No. 3 Vol. 11; No. 3 THE VELIGER Page 277 Recognition of an Eastern Pacific Macoma in the Coralline Crag of England and its Biogeographic Significance BY EUGENE V. COAN Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University Stanford, California 94305 EvIDENCE HAS BEEN ACCUMULATING over the last few years that Bering Strait was open during the late Mio- cene, closed through most of the Pliocene, then open and closed several times from the late Pliocene through the Pleistocene. These submergences allowed the exchange of marine life, chiefly from the Pacific to the Atlantic O- ceans (MacNem, 1965; Hopkins, 1967). Pacific elements in the Coralline Crag of England, of Astian (Pliocene) age (BADEN-PowELL, 1960), may rep- resent either late arrivals from the late Miocene submer- gence (Hopkins, personal communication) or early arrivals from the late Pliocene submergence (Zullo, per- sonal communication). The larger influx (in terms of the number of species) of Pacific elements present in the Red Crag (Pleistocene) of England and similar deposits on the mainland of Europe and in Iceland may represent either an event of submergence in the Bering Strait area or similar tectonic events in the Canadian archipelago (Hopkins, 1967). In connection with a revision of the Eastern Pacific Tellinacea, I can now report further evidence concerning the trans-Arctic migrations of mollusks. The boreal spe- cies of the genus Macoma, with a geological record from the Eocene to the Recent in the Eastern Pacific (KEEN & Bentson, 1944), have recently been discussed as not having reached the Atlantic Ocean until the Pleistocene influx (DuRHAM & MacNeit in Hopxtins, 1967). I find that M. obliqua (Sowersy, 1817)', reported from the Coralline Crag of England (Woop, 1848, 1874; British Museum [Natural History|], 1963) and from the correl- ative, Scaldisian strata in Belgium (Gutpert, 1958a, b), is conspecific with a Recent West American boreal spe- cies, commonly identified with M. incongrua (von Mar- TENS, 1865)’. Macoma lyelli Dati, 1894, described from the late Miocene or early Pliocene of Marthas Vineyard, Mas- sachusetts (also Dati, 1900b), and M. cookei GARDNER, 1943, described from the Upper Miocene of Virginia seem to be closely related. As Recent and fossil Eastern Pacific specimens of Macoma obliqua differ significantly from Recent material from Japan, type locality of M. incongrua, the Western Pacific form should be regarded as a distinct subspecies or species. Macoma obliqua has become extinct in the North Atlantic since the Pleistocene. ' Tellina obliqua J. Sowersy, 1817, non Woop, 1815. The Inter- national Commisson on Zoological Nomenclature has been pe- tioned to conserve the name of this well-known Cenozoic fossil which has only recently been discovered to be a junior homo- nym of an unimportant junior subjective synonym. Type spe- cimens of the Sowerby species are in the British Museum (Natural History), and Stanford University now has specimens from the Red Crag which have been compared with this type material. 2 Tellina incongrua voN Martens, 1865. A potential lectotype, measuring 25.4mm in length, is in the Zool. Mus., Humboldt Univ., Berlin, no. 7624. Synonyms appear to be Tellina nasuta truncata MuippENporFF, 1851, non Linnarus, 1767, and T: nasuta brevior SCHRENCK, 1867. Macoma frigida (HANLEY, 1844), described from Kamchatka, seems to be a closely-related, but distinct species. Dati (1900a) suggested that Tellina rotundata SoweErRBy, 1867, might be a synonym of Macoma incongrua. The type specimen in the BM(NH) proves to be M. balthica (LINNAEus, 1758). He also suggested that M. californiensis Bertin, 1878, was a synonym. Photographs of the type specimens of the latter, kindly provided by I’Ecole des Mines, Paris, prove these to be Macalia bruguiert (Hantey, 1844), mislabeled as to locality, for the species is Asian. Page 278 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 The synonymy of Macoma obliqua and the West A- merican M. incongrua of authors, foreshadowed by the association of the two names in the Pleistocene of Iceland (Erarsson, Hopkins, & Doet in Hopxins, 1967), sug- gests that migrations from the Pacific to the Atlantic during the first Cenozoic submergence of Bering Strait in the late Miocene may have been more extensive in terms of the number of species involved than previously thought (as listed by DuRHAM & MacNetL in Hopkins, 1967). West American paleontologists and marine mol- luscan systematists will have to take into account this exchange and the resulting nomenclatural involvements with European and Atlantic fossil species. I would also suggest that the isolation created by the Pliocene land bridge subsequent to the late Miocene sea passage may partially explain the presence of so many boreal species of some genera, such as Macoma, in the North Pacific Basin. For instance, M. middendor ffi Dat, 1884, a related Bering Sea species, with published records in the Miocene, Pliocene, and Pleistocene of the North Pacific, may represent the population which remained in the Pacific Ocean when M. obliqua traveled to and became isolated in the Atlantic-Arctic in the Pliocene. A preliminary survey of literature indicates that an- other, now extinct species of boreal Macoma may have reached the Atlantic as early as the European Anversian (Miocene). Taxa that ought to be compared with one another in order to prove this are M. albaria (Conrap, 1849), M. virginiana (Conrap, 1866) (and its subspe- cies), and M. elliptica (Broccui, 1814) of GutBERT (1958a, 1958b) and others. LITERATURE CITED BapEN-PoweELL, D. F W. 1960. On the nature of the Coralline Crag. CH (Bis WB = ey BErTIN, VICTOR 1878. Révision des tellinidés du Muséum d’Histoire Natu- relle .... Nouv. Arch. Natl. Mus. Hist. Nat. Paris (2) 1: 201 - 361; plts. 8-9 BritisH Museum (Natura History) 1963. British Caenozoic fossils, 2%” ed. Mus.) pp. i- vii+1 - 133; plts. 1 - 44 Broccu1, GIovANNI BATTISTA 1814. Conchiologia fossile Subapennina con osservazioni geo- logiche sugli Apennini e sula suolo adiacente. Milano (Dalla Stamp. Reale) 1: 1-56 + i-Ixxx + 1-240; 2: 241-712; plts. 1 - 16 Conrapb, TimotHy ABBOTT 1849. Fossils from northwestern America. In J.D. Dana “Geology: United States Exploring Expedition, during the years ... , under the command of Charles Wilkes, ... .” 10: 723 - 728; plts. 17 - 21 1866. Note on the genus Gadus, with the descriptions of some Geol. Mag. London (Brit. new genera and species of American fossil shells. Amer. Journ. Conch. 2 (1): 75-78 (1 January 1866) DALL, Wi1LLt1aAM HEALEY 1884. | Report on the Mollusca of the Commander Islands, Bering Sea, collected by Leonard Stejneger in 1882 and 1883. (Contributions to the history of the Commander Islands, no. 3). Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 7 (22) : 340 - 349; plt. 2 (3 October 1884) 1894. | Notes on the Miocene and Pliocene of Gay Head, Martha’s Vineyard, Mass., and on the “land phosphate” of the Ashley River district, South Carolina. Amer. Journ. Sci. (3) 48 [148] (286) [art. 42]: 296 - 301 (Oct. 1894) 1900a. Synopsis of the family Tellinidae and of the North American species. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., 23 (1210): 285 to 326; plts. 2-4 (14 November 1900) 1900b. Contributions of the Tertiary fauna of Florida with especial reference to the Silex Beds of Tampa and the Plio- cene beds of the Caloosahatchie River including in many cases a complete revision of the generic groups treated and their American Tertiary species. Trans. Wagner Free Inst. 3 (5) [Teleodesmacea: Solen to Diplodonta]: i -x+949 - 1218; plts. 36 - 47 (December 1900) Garpner, JULIA ANNA 1943. Mollusca from the Miocene and Lower Pliocene of Virginia and North Carolina. Part I. Pelecypoda. U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper 199A: i-iv+1-178; plts. 1 - 23 GLIBERT, MAxIME 1958a. ‘Tableau stratigraphique des mollusques du Neogene de la Belgique. Bull. Inst. Roy. Sci. Nat. Belg. 34 (32): 1-20 (October 1958) 1958b. Pelecypodes du Diestien, du Scaldisien et du Merxe- mien de la Belgique, 3™* note. Bull. Inst. Roy. Sci. Nat. Belg. 34 (42): 1 - 27; plts. 3-4 (November 1958) HANLEY, SYLVANUS 2 1844. | On new species of the genus Tellina, chiefly collected by Hugh Cuming, Esq., in the Philippine Islands and Central America [one section only]. Proc, Zool. Soc. London (for 1844) 14 [prt. 12] (138): 140 - 144 (December 1844) Hopxins, Davin M., (ed.) 1967. ‘The Bering land bridge. Univ.) : i- xiiit1 - 495; illust. Keen, A. Myra & Herpis BENTSON 1944. Check list of California Tertiary marine Mollusca. Geol. Soc. Amer. Spec. Pap. 56: i- viiit+1 - 280; 4 text figs.; Stanford, Calif. (Stanford 2 tab. (30 August 1944) LINNAEUS, CAaROLUS 1758. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae ... editio decima, reformata 1 [Regnum animale]. Stockholm (Laurentii Salvii) pp. 1 - 824+41- iii 1767. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae ... editio duodecima, reformata 1 [Regnum animale] (2): 533 - 1327. Stockholm (Laurentii Salvii) MacNem, Francis STEARNS 1965. Evolution and distribution of the genus Mya, and Ter- tiary migrations of Mollusca. U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper 483G: i-iv+1-51; plts. 1- 11 MippEnporFF, ALEXANDER THEODOR (VON) 1851. Mollusken Jn “Dr. A. Th. v. Middendorff’s Reise in den dussersten Norden und Osten Sibiriens” 2 [Zoologie] (1- Wirbellose Thiere) : 163 - 464, 505 - 508, 512 - 516; plts. 8 - 30. Saint Petersburg (Kaiserl. Akad. Wissensch.) (30 Sept. 1851) Vol. 11; No. 3 THE VELIGER Page 279 ScHRENCK, LEoPoLD IvANovICH (voN) VON MartENs, EDUARD 1867. Mollusken des Amur-Landes und des Nordjapanischen 1865. Description of new species of shells. Ann. Mag. Meeres. Reisen und Forschungen im Amur-Lande in den Jah- Nat. Hist. (3) 16 (96) [art. 49]: 428 - 432 (Dec. 1865) ren 1854 - 1856 im Auftrage der Kaiserl. Akad. Wissensch. zu St. Petersburg 2 [Zoologie] (Mollusken): 259 - 976; pits. 12 - 30 (post-October 1867) SoweErsBy, GeorcE BRETTINGHAM (2%? of name) 1867[1866 - 1869]. Monograph of the genus Tellina In Con- chologia Iconica: or, illustrations of shells of molluscous ani- mals, by L. A. Reeve 17 (2): plts. 1-58, each individually dated. SoweErRBY, JAMES 1817 [1815 - 1818]. The mineral conchology of Great Britain; or coloured figures and descriptions of those remains of testaceous animals or shells, which have been preserved at various times and depths in the earth. London (privately printed) 2: 1-251; plts. 103 - 203 Woop, SEARLES V. 1848. A monograph of the Crag Mollusca, with descriptions of shells from the upper Tertiaries of the British Isles 2 (Bi- valves) . Palaeo. Soc. 9: 217 - 342; plts. 21 - 31 1874. Supplement to the monograph of the Crag Mollusca, with descriptions of shells from the upper Tertiaries of the east of England. Palaeo. Soc. 27: 99-231; plts. 8-11 +1 more Woop, WILLIAM 1815. | General conchology; or, a description of shells, arranged according to the Linnean system, and illustrated with plates drawn and coloured from nature, .. . 1. London (John Booth). [only one volume ever issued]: i-lxit1-7+1- 246; pits. 1-59, 4* (issued in as-yet undated parts, from 1814 to 1815) Page 280 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 NOTES & NEWS A Color Variation of Aldisa sanguinea BY RICHARD A. ROLLER 1127 Seaward Street, San Luis Obispo, California 93401 (1 Text figure) COLLECTION AND OBSERVATION of a fairly large number of specimens of the nudibranch Aldisa sanguinea (Coo- PER, 1862) over a 2-year period in San Luis Obispo County, California, have shown that this species commonly has varying amounts of yellow pigment on the dorsal surface. This pigment tends to be arranged in repeated patterns, frequently in the shape of a “T”. Color descriptions of Aldisa sanguinea given in the literature by Baza (1949), Cooper (1862), MAcFARLAND (1905, 1906, 1966), Marcus (1961), and O’DoNocHUE (1927) indicate a body color of red, in varying shades, accompanied generally by two black spots on the median line of the dorsum. No mention is made in the literature. of any yellow pigment or distinctive yellow pattern. Pruvot-Fou (1954, p. 268; fig. 106) pictures a “T”- shaped marking for A. banyulensis Pruvot-Fo., 1951, a red species with whitish stripes. BaBa (1949, plt. 25, fig. 94) shows a figure of Halgerda rubicunda Basa, 1949 with a similar “T-shaped marking, except that the “T” points in an anterior direction, rather than a posterior one. The animal is described (op. cit. p. 135) as “Gen- eral body colour orange-red, a short longitudinal band of dull yellow medianly between the rhinophores, and there is another, but transverse, band of the same colour a short distance in front of the branchiae.” To date 27 specimens of Aldisa sanguinea (from 11 to 35 mm in length) have been collected or observed alive by the author. Of these animals, 17 had an obvious chrome-yellow “T”’-shaped marking on the posterior half of the dorsum. This marking is made up of a dense series of fine yellow dots forming an irregular band across the dorsum, just ahead of the posterior black spot. This yellow pigment disappears completely from the median area of the dorsum. A similar yellow band extends from the branchial area, posteriorly along the median line to the mantle edge (Figure 1). Of the 27 animals observed, all but 2 exhibited a transverse yellow band across the dorsum, and only one animal had no observable yellow pigment. Many of the animals were heavily marked with yellow pigment, scat- tered in varying amounts, over the anterior or posterior regions of the dorsum, or both, the branchial plumes, and the anal area inside of the branchial plumes. Continued collection of specimens with variations from the usually reported color tends to make this color vari- ety the expected one for this area. Baba (personal com- munication) states that he has not seen a single “T”- shaped marking in Japanese specimens of Aldisa sangui- Figure 1 Aldisa sanguinea (Cooper, 1862) Stippling indicates yellow pigment nea. No collectors that I have contacted have seen this color variation anywhere except in San Luis Obispo County; however, a color slide by Mr. Robert Ames of Oakland, California, shows 2 specimens with transverse yellow bands. It is hoped that anyone collecting specimens of A. sanguinea will look for similar markings and pig- mentation; and I would appreciate any information on the color pattern of this species. I acknowledge the assistance of Mr. Steven J. Long and Mr, Gary McDonald in obtaining specimens. I also appreciate the aid and advice of Mr. James R. Lance in preparing the manuscript. Vol. 11; No. 3 LITERATURE CITED Basa, K1KUTARO 1949. Opisthobranchia of Sagami Bay, collected by his Majesty the Emperor of Japan. 4, 2, 194, 7 pp., plts. 1-50 (in color), 161 text figs. Iwanami Shoten, Tokyo. Cooper, JAMES GRAHAM 1862. Some genera and species of California Mollusca. Proc, Calif. Acad. Nat. Sci. 2: 202 - 207 MacFaruanp, FRANK Mace 1905. A preliminary account of the Dorididae of Monterey Bay, California. Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, 18: 35 - 54 1906. | Opisthobranchiate mollusca from Monterey Bay, Cali- fornia, and vicinity. Bull. U.S. Bur. Fish for 1905, 25: 109 - 151; plts. 18 - 31 1966. Studies of opisthobranchiate mollusks of the Pacific Coast of North America. Mem. Calif. Acad. Sci. 6: xvi + 546 pp.; 72 plts. (8 April 1966) Marcus, Ernst 1961. Opisthobranch mollusks from California. The Veliger 3 (Supplement, pt. I) : 1-85; plts. 1-10. (Feb. 1, 1961) O’ DONOGHUE, CHARLES HENRY 1927. Notes on a collection of nudibranchs from Laguna Beach, California. Journ. Entom. Zool. Pomona College 19: 77-119; plts. 1-3 Pruvot-Fox, ALICE 1951. Etudes des nudibranches de la Méditerrannée (2 partie) . Arch. Zool. Expér. Génér. 88: 1-80; 42 figs.; pits. 1-4 1954. | Mollusques opisthobranches. in Faune de France, 58: 460 pp.; 1 plt.; 173 text figs.; Paris, Paul Lechevalier. Two New Records of Cratena abronia BY STEVEN J. LONG 126 Esparto Avenue, Pismo Beach, California 93449 On June 11, 1968, a single specimen of Cratena abronia MacFar.anp, 1966 was collected by the author at Dino- saur Cave in the north end of Pismo Beach, San Luis Obispo County, California. The specimen was found in the mid-tide zone on Desmarestia herbacea (TuRNER, 1808). The specimen measured 5mm in length, and matched well MacFar.anp’s description and illustration of the species. Mr. Richard A. Roller, of San Luis Obis- po, California, made a series of color transparencies of the animal and extracted the radula to permit corrobora- tion of the identification. The radula has been preserved in alcohol. On June 12, 1968, a second Cratena abronia was taken at the south end of Sunset Palisades, about 2 miles north of the first collecting point. This specimen was found in the same tidal region, also on Desmarestia herbacea. This animal was in poor condition, having lost several cerata. THE VELIGER Page 281 It measured 5 mm in length when alive; it was preserved in alcohol for later study. Cratena abronia was described from several speci- mens collected at Point Pinos, Monterey Bay, California (36°38’ N; 121°55’ W). Pismo Beach is located at 35°09’ N and 120°38’ W. This constitutes a southward range extension of about 230 miles. LITERATURE CITED MacFarianp, Frank Mace 1966. Studies of opisthobranchiate mollusks of the Pacific Coast of North America. Mem. Calif. Acad. Sci. 6: xvi + 546 pp.; 72 plts. (8 April 1966) What is Macoma truncaria DALL? BY EUGENE V. COAN Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University Stanford, California 94305 (1 Text figure) WHILE STUDYING TYPE SPECIMENS of West American tellinaceans at the United States National Museum, I photographed and sketched the unique holotype of Ma- coma truncaria Dati, 1916, described from between Cape Halkett and Garry Creek [as “River’] on the Arctic coast of Alaska. A brief synonymy is as follows: Datt, 1916a: 37 [nomen nudum] Dati, 1916b: 414 Dati, 1921: 48 O.proyp, 1925: 177 Burcu, 1945: 15 Figure 1 “Macoma” truncaria DaLL, 1916, holotype, USNM 210916, X 2.4 Drawing by Mr. Perfecto Mary Page 282 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 The holotype, USNM 210916, a broken pair with only the left valve complete, measures 15 mm in length and proves to be a small, thickened specimen of Thracia (Crassithracia). It seems closest to T. (C.) beringi Dat, 1915, but the correct allocation would require careful study by one more familiar with the several circum-Arc- tic species of the genus than I. A line drawing is here provided for the use of other workers. LITERATURE CITED Burcu, JoHNn Quincy (ed.) 1945. Superfamily Tellinacea. Calif. no. 43: 3 - 33 Dai, WituiamM HEALEY 1915. A review of some bivalve shells of the group Anatina- cea from the west coast of America. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 49 (2116): 441-456 (27 November 1915) 1916a. Checklist of the Recent bivalve mollusks (Pelecypoda) of the northwest coast of America from the Polar Sea to San Diego, California. Los Angeles, Calif. (Southwest Mus.). pp. 1 - 44; 1 portrait (28 July 1916) 1916b. Diagnoses of new species of marine bivalve mollusks from the northwest coast of America in the collection of the United States National Museum. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 52 (2183): 393 - 417 (27 December 1916) 1921. Summary of the marine shellbearing mollusks of the northwest coast of America, from San Diego, California, to the Polar Sea, mostly contained in the collection of the United States National Museum, Smithson. Inst., U.S. Nat. Mus. Bull. 112: 1-217; plts. 1-22 (24 February 1921) O.proyp, Ipa SHEPARD 1925. The marine shells of the west coast of North America 1 [Pelecypoda]. Stanford Univ. Publ., Univ. Ser. Geol. Sci. 1 (1): 1-247; pits. 1-57 (September 1925) Min. Conch. Club South. (January 1945) Spawning Notes, II. - Mitra dolorosa BY FAY H. WOLFSON San Diego Natural History Museum, San Diego, California 92115 (3 Text figures) No spAWNING BY Mitra (Strigatella) dolorosa DAtt, 1903 had been noted during field trips to Bahia de los Angeles, Baja California, Mexico in April, August, September and December 1967 or in January and April 1968. However, on 23 July 1967 and again on 25 May 1968, I observed spawning at approximately mid-tide level during low tide. In both cases, eggs were being deposited on a small stone situated beneath larger overhanging rocks. There were 2 Figure 1 Figure 2 Detail of capsule, top view Figure 3 Detail of capsule, side view individuals on the stone in July and 5 on the stone in May, although in each case only a single individual ap- peared to be in the process of oviposition. Approximately 50 capsules, forming an irregular ellipse, had been ex- truded in both instances. The translucent sausage-shaped capsules rest lightly against each other. Each tapers to a thin stalk which flares into a basal membrane by which the cluster is attached to the substrate (Figure 1). The capsules aver- Voll I Nos 3 age 1.04 < 2.16 mm in size, with a range of from 0.88 x 1.91 mm to 1.17 & 2.35 mm. An oval inner membrane completely fills the “sau- sage” and contains approximately 100 opaque, cream-col- ored eggs, many of which bear a small cap of darkly pigmented cells. The eggs average 0.147 mm in greatest diameter and appear to be distributed in random clumps. Figures 2 and 3 show the raised, thickened structure situated at or near the top of the capsule. Rupturing of the thin membrane between the “lips” in the center of the structure presumably provides an exit at hatching time. The figures were drawn by Anne Acevedo of the San Diego Museum of Natural History. Littorina littorea in California (San Francisco and Trinidad Bays) BY JAMES CARLTON 521 Mandana Boulevard, Oakland, California 94610 A SINGLE LIVING SPECIMEN of the common Atlantic peri- winkle, Littorina littorea LinNaEuS, 1758 was collected by the writer at Berkeley, in San Francisco Bay, Califor- nia, on July 11, 1968, approximately 300 m north of the foot of Ashby Avenue, along the East Shore Highway. The animal was in a rock crevice, and despite an hour’s search, no additional specimens were located. The pres- ent specimen measures 15.7 mm in length and 13.8mm in width, Littorina littorea is known from the Pacific coast of North America through the collection of at least 5 speci- mens in Deception Pass, Puget Sound, Washington, in 1937 (Hanna, 1966). The hypotype illustrated by Han- NA was compared with the present specimen and its identification confirmed by Dr. Leo G. Hertlein of the California Academy of Sciences. All 5 specimens from Washington bear opercula, indicating live collection. In addition, there are 2 specimens in the collections of the California Academy of Sciences (cat. no. 39464) from Trinidad Bay, California (just north of Humboldt Bay), collected alive by Dr. Doris K. Niles on July 28, 1942, but not received at the Academy until 1965, too late for inclusion in Dr. Hanna’s paper. The specimens measure 27.0mm in length by 21.4 mm in width, and 26.1 mm by 20.4 mm. THE VELIGER Page 283 It may be noted here that no specimens of Littorina littorea from Pacific coast localities have been found in the Stanford University collection (Dr. A. Myra Keen, personal communication), nor in the collection of the Department of Paleontology of the University of Cali- fornia, Berkeley (examined by the writer through the courtesy of Dr. Joseph H. Peck). Thus, living Littorina littorea are now known on the Pacific coast from Puget Sound, Washington; Trinidad and San Francisco Bays, California. The collection of additional specimens from San Francisco Bay will help to determine whether this mollusk has been able to estab- lish a reproducing population, or whether the present collection represents only one of a limited number of individuals directly transported to the Bay. Dr. Niles reports (in litt.) that she has been unable recently to find this species in Trinidad Bay and there are no known subsequent reports from Puget Sound. It is interesting to note that the discovery of Littorina littorea on the Pacific coast has proceeded chronologically southward. A similar situation has prevailed since the early part of the nineteenth century on the Atlantic coast of the United States, where this mollusk has been recorded as progressively moving southward, from Nova Scotia (since 1840) to Maryland (in 1959) (WELLS, 1965). Its probable southern limit is correlated with a 21° C mean water isotherm (WELLS, op. cit.). There is no indication, however, that the Pacific coast occurrences illustrate a natural southward movement, but rather it appears that this species was accidentally introduced into the 3 known localities on as many different occa- sions. The progressively southern occurrence of L. litto- rea on the Pacific coast is apparently a coincidence with the Atlantic coast phenomenon. The means of introduction of this northern Atlantic snail into San Francisco Bay, and earlier into Trinidad Bay, remain problematical. The abundance of exotic mollusks in the San Francisco Bay region [e. g., the At- lantic species Modiolus demissus (Dittwyn, 1817), Mya arenaria LINNAEUS, 1758, Gemma gemma (TorTTEN, 1834), Nassarius obsoletus (Say, 1822), Urosalpinx cin- ereus (Say, 1822), Busycotypus canaliculatus (LINNAE- us, 1758), and the Oriental species Tapes japonicus DEs- HAYES, 1853, and Musculus senhouse: (BENSON, 1842) ], as well as a number of other invertebrates, supposedly largely introduced through oyster transport, well illus- trates the ease with which exotic species have established themselves locally. Almost all of the accidentally intro- duced Atlantic mollusks arrived when shipments of the American oyster, Crassostrea virginica (GMELIN, 1791) were still being transported on a large scale to the Pacif- Page 284 ic coast, before 1935 (Hanna, 1966). The possibility that this rather conspicuous species was introduced with Crassostrea into San Francisco Bay more than 30 years ago, and has been overlooked, is not probable, when the continuous collecting and numerous field expeditions by local biologists, students, and shell collectors are con- sidered. The possibility that the large introduced Atlantic whelk, Busycotypus canaliculatus, was overlooked for a period of 10 years (between 1938 and 1948) is held im- probable by SToHLER (1962). However, small shipments of Crassostrea from the Atlantic coast of the United States are still being received for placement in San Fran- cisco Bay, and between 1962 and 1967 plantings of oyster spat were made 2 or 3 times in the southern por- tion of the Bay on an experimental basis only (Mr. W. Dahlstrom, Calif. Dept. Fish and Game, personal com- munication). It is possible that juvenile Littorina, or Lit- torina eggs, may have been introduced with these ship- ments. A second method by which this snail may have been introduced involves the Atlantic quahog, Mercenaria mercenaria (LINNAEUS, 1758). The report by NortH (1963), cited by Hanna (1966), concerning the planting 6f 2000 Mercenaria in San Francisco Bay in 1963 is in error (personal communications from Dahlstrom and Dr. V. Loosanoff), and thus there have apparently been no official plantings of this bivalve in the Bay (Dahlstrom, Loosanoff, and J. A. Aplin, personal communications). However, in January, 1968 several living Mercenara were discovered at Coyote Point, San Mateo County, in San Francisco Bay, together with numerous specimens of the venerid Tapes japonicus by Mr. R. Setzer, a grad- uate student at San Francisco State College (personal communications from Setzer and Mr. D. Chivers, Calif. Acad. Sci.). This small and questionably established population is apparently the result of an independent ef- fort by an unknown person, and was without the planting permission of the California Department of Fish and Game (Aplin, personal communication). In addition, local restaurants are continually importing Atlantic qua- hogs, and may dump spoiled shipments into the Bay. It is also known that many independent introductions of Atlantic oysters and clams have been made into the San Francisco Bay region, and that, additionally, plantings made officially in other California bays may be brought into San Francisco Bay by private persons (Loosanoff, personal communication). It is thus also quite possible that specimens of Littorina may have been transported recently from the Atlantic coast with Mercenaria. The present shell with the operculum has been depos- ited in the Department of Geology, California Academy THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 of Sciences (catalogue no. 40981); the animal has been placed in the wet collections of the Department of In- vertebrate Zoology of the same institution. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS For generous assistance with various details and in the examination of specimens in the collection of the Cali- fornia Academy of Sciences, I thank Dr. Leo G. Hertlein. Mr. Dustin Chivers of the Academy kindly aided with the curating of the specimen and contributed suggestions and advice as did Mr. John Holleman of Merritt College, Oakland. Dr. Joseph Peck generously permitted me to examine the large shell collection of the Department of Paleontology of the University of California, and Dr. Myra Keen kindly provided information about the Stan- ford collections. Dr. Doris K. Niles also furnished addi- tional information concerning the material from Trini- dad Bay. I wish to thank also Mr. J. Allan Aplin, Mr. Walter Dahlstrom, Dr. Victor Loosanoff, and Mr. Robert Setzer for communicating to me their records of Mer- cenaria or Crassostrea in San Francisco Bay. LITERATURE CITED Hanna, G Datias 1966. Introduced mollusks of western North America. Occ. Pap. Calif. Acad. Sci. no. 48: 108 pp.; 85 figs.; 4 plts. (16 February 1966) Nortu, Dan 1963. Oysters from Europe for San Francisco. San Fran- cisco Examiner, sect. 1, p. 23 [cited in Hanna, 1966] (16 June 1963) STOHLER, RUDOLF 1962. Busycotypus (B.) canaliculatus in San Francisco Bay. The Veliger 4 (4): 211-212; 1 text fig. (1 April 1962) WELLs, Harry M. 1965. Maryland records of the gastropod, Littorina littorea, with a discussion of factors controlling its southern distribution. Chesapeake Sci. 6 (1): 38-42; 1 fig. (March 1965) Revision of “Introduced Mollusks of Western North America’’ JAMES CARLTON 521 Mandana Boulevard, Oakland, California 94610 A REVISION OF G DaLias HANnna’s recent paper on the introduced Mollusca of western North America (HANNA, 1966) is currently being undertaken under the supervision Vol. 11; No. 3 of Allyn G. Smith, Associate Curator, Department of Invertebrate Zoology, California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco. Geographic regions covered include Cali- fornia, Oregon, Washington, and British Columbia. Wor- kers with any corrections, comments, suggestions, or new records are encouraged to send such information to Mr. Smith at the Academy, Golden Gate Park, San Francisco, California 94118. LITERATURE CITED Hanna, G Datias 1966. Introduced mollusks of western North America. Occ. Pap. Calif. Acad. Sci. no. 48: 108 pp.; 85 figs.; 4 plts. (16 February 1966) A.M. U. AT THE ANNUAL MEETING of the American Malacologi- cal Union at Corpus Christi, Texas, the following officers were elected to serve during 1968-1969: Dr. Joseph Rosewater, President Dr. Alan G. Solem, Vice-President Dr. Bruce G. Campbell, Second Vice-President ' Mrs. Margaret C. Teskey, Secretary Mrs. H. B. Baker, Treasurer Mr. Morris K. Jacobson, Publications Editor Councillors-at-Large elected are: Donald R. Moore, Robert Robertson, Donald R. Shasky, Myra Taylor. The 1969 annual meeting will be held July 21 to 25 at Marinette, Wisconsin. Margaret C. Teskey, Secretary. A. M. U. Pacific Division AT THE ANNUAL MEETING at Asilomar, California, in June 1968 the following officers were elected to serve for an indefinite period: Dr. Bruce G. Campbell, Chairman Dr. James H. McLean, Vice-Chairman Mrs. Ruth French, Secretary and Treasurer No meetings are planned for the near future. The an- nual assessment of 50 cents per person was rescinded. The Honor Award, bestowed by the Division from time to time, was presented to Dr. Leo G. Hertlein of the California Academy of Sciences for his continued out- standing contributions to Malacology. THE VELIGER Page 285 W. S. M. AT THE FIRST ANNUAL MEETING at Asilomar, California, in June 1968, the Society adopted its bylaws. Officers elected are: Dr. William K. Emerson, President Dr. A. Myra Keen, First Vice-President Mr. Eugene V. Coan, Second Vice-President Mrs. R. (Forrest) Poorman, Treasurer Mrs. Bernadine Hughes, Secretary As Representatives-at-Large were elected: Dr. Judith Terry, and Miss Betsy Harrison. At the meeting a contest was held for the best paper submitted by a college student. A first and a second prize was awarded to Miss M. T. Vassallo and Mr. S. K. Webs- ter, respectively. The second annual meeting will be held from June 18 to 21, 1969, at Asilomar. U. M. E. AT THE THIRD Concress of the European Malacologi- cal Union in Vienna, September 2 to 7, 1968, the follow- ing officers were elected: Dr. Eugéne Binder (Geneva), President Dr. FE E. Loosjes (Wageningen), Vice President Dr. A. Zilch (Frankfurt), Secretary Dr. Lothar Forcart (Basle), Treasurer The next meeting of the Unitas Malacologica Euro- paea will take place in Geneva, Switzerland in the year LOWE Important N otices Because of the changed rules affecting second class mail matter, we will no longer be able to include the customary reminders in our January issue, nor can we attach any flyers to our journal henceforth. We shall, from now on, print a statement when dues-renewal time has arrived or announcements regarding special publi- cations in our Notes « News column. Page 286 Moving? If your address is changed it will be important to notify us of the new address at least six weeks before the effective date, and not less than six weeks before our regular mailing dates. Because of a number of drastic changes in the regulations affecting second class mailing, there is now a sizeable charge to us on the returned copies as well as for our remailing to the new address. We are forced to ask our members and subscribers for reimbursement of these charges; further, because of increased costs in connection with the new mailing plate, we also must ask for reimbursement of that expense. Effective January 8, 1968 the following charges must be made: change of address — $1.- change of address and re-mailing of a returned issue — $2.-. We must emphasize that these charges cover only our actual expenses and do not include compensation for the extra work involved in re-packing and re-mailing returned copies. THE CALIFORNIA MALACOZOOLOGICAL SocIETy, Inc. announces Backnumbers of THE VELIGER and other publications Volume 9: $22.- Volume 10: $24.- Volumes 1 through 8: out of print Supplement to Volume 3: $6.-* plus $-.50 handling charge [Part 1: Opisthobranch Mollusks of California by Prof. Ernst Marcus; Part 2: The Anaspidea of California by Prof. R. Beeman THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 and The Thecosomata and Gymnosomata of the Cali- fornia Current by Prof. John A. McGowan] [The two parts are available separately at $3.- each plus a handling charge of $-.40 or as indicated above. If purchased separately, each part is subject to the Califor- nia State sales tax if mailed to California addresses. ] Supplement to Volume 7: $2.-* plus $-.40 handling charge [Glossary of A Thousand-and-One Terms used in Conchology, compiled by WintrreD H. Arnop] Supplement to Volume 11: $5.-* plus $-.40 handling charge [The Biology of Acmaea by Prof. D. P. Assortr et al., ed.] Items marked with * are subject to sales tax in the State of California; residents of that State please add the appropriate amount to their remittances. Prices subject to change without notice. Send orders with remittance to: Mrs. Jean M. Cate, Manager, 12719 San Vicente Boule- vard, Los Angeles, Calif. 90049. Please, make checks payable to C. M.S., Inc. Shipments of material ordered are generally made within two weeks after receipt of remittance. Backnumbers of the current volume will be mailed to new subscribers, as well as to those who renew late, on the first working day of the month following receipt of the remittance. The same policy applies to new members. Subscription to Volume 11: $18.- domestic; $18.80 in Canada, Mexico, Central and South America; $19.20 all other foreign coutries. Subscription to Volume 12: $18.- domestic; $19.- in Canada, Mexico, Central and South America; $19.50 in all other foreign countries. Affiliate Membership in the C.M.S., Inc. is $6.- for the fiscal year July 1, 1968 to June 30, 1969. Postage for members living in Canada, Mexico, Central and South America 80 cents, for members living in any other foreign country $1.20 additional. Membership open to indi- viduals only - no institutional memberships. Please, send for membership application forms to the Manager or the Editor. Affiliate Membership for the fiscal year July 1, 1969 to June 30, 1970 has been set at $8.-. Postage for members in Canada, Mexico, Central and South America $1.-, for members in any other foreign country $1.50 additional. Vol. 11; No. 3 At a Regular Membership Meeting of the CaLirornia Matacozoo.tocicaL Society, Inc. the following policies were adopted by unanimous vote: Effective January 1, 1967 there will be an initiation fee of $2.- for persons joining the Society. NOTE: No Insti- tutional Memberships are possible in the C. M.S., Inc. Members receive The Veliger free of further charges and are entitled to purchase one copy of any supplement pub- lished during the current membership year at a special discount (to be determined for each supplement). Membership renewals are due on or before April 15 each year. If renewal payments are made after April 15 but before March 15 of the following year, there will be a re-instatement fee of $1.-. Members whose dues pay- ments (including the re-instatement fee) have not been received by the latter date, will be dropped from the rolls of the Society. They may rejoin by paying a new initiation fee. The volume(s) published during the time a member was in arrears may be purchased, if still available, at the regular full volume price plus applicable handling charges. Manuscripts received up to February 14 each year will be considered for publication in our July issue; May 14 is the deadline for the October issue, August 14 for the January issue and November 14 for the April issue. For very short papers of less than 500 words (including title, etc.) the deadlines are one month later than those given above, provided that these short notes are impor- tant enough to warrant preferential treatment. It is, how- ever, understood that submission of a manuscript before the dates indicated is not a guarantee of acceptance. CALIFORNIA MALACOZOOLOGICAL Society, Inc. is a non-profit educational corporation (Articles of In- corporation No. 463389 were filed January 6, 1964 in the office of the Secretary of State). The Society publishes a scientific quarterly, the VELIGER. Donations to the Society are used to pay a part of the production costs and thus to keep the subscription rate at a minimum. Donors may designate the Fund to which their contribution is to be credited: Operating Fund (available for current production) ; Savings Fund (available only for specified purposes, such as publication of especially long and signi- ficant papers); Endowment Fund (the income from which is available. The principal is irrevocably dedicated THE VELIGER Page 287 to scientific and educational purposes). Unassigned dona- tions will be used according to greatest need. Contributions to the C. M.S., Inc. are deductible by donors as provided in section 170 of the Internal Revenue Code (for Federal income tax purposes). Bequests, lega- cies, gifts, devices are deductible for Federal estate and gift tax purposes under section 2055, 2106, and 2522 of the Code. The Treasurer of the C. M. S., Inc. will issue suitable receipts which may be used by Donors to substan- tiate their respective tax deductions. Endowment Fund At a Regular Membership meeting of the Society in No- vember 1968 a policy was adopted which, it is hoped, will assist in building up the Endowment Fund of the Society. An issue of the journal will be designated as a Memorial Issue in honor of a person from whose estate the sum of $5000.- or more has been paid to the Veliger Endowment Fund. If the bequest is $25 000.- or more, an entire volume will be dedicated to the memory of the decedent. In the face of continuous rises in the costs of printing and labor, the income from the Endowment Fund would materially aid in avoiding the need for repeated upward adjustments of the membership dues of the Society. It is the stated aim of the Society to disseminate new infor- mation in the field of malacology and conchology as widely as possible at the lowest cost possible. ABOUT SUPPLEMENTS Many of our members desire to receive all supplements published by the Society. Since heretofore we have sent supplements only on separate order, some members have missed the chance of obtaining their copy through over- sight or because of absence from home. It has been sug- gested to us that we should accept “standing orders” from individuals to include all supplements published in the future. After careful consideration we have agreed to the proposal. We will accept written requests from individuals to place their names on our list to receive all future sup- plements upon publication; we will enclose our invoice at the same time. The members’s obligation will be only to pay promptly upon receipt of the invoice. Requests to be placed on this special mailing list should be sent to the Manager, Mrs. Jean M. Cate, 12719 San Vicente Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90049. Page 288 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 METHODS & TECHNIQUES A Method of Tagging Mollusks Underwater BY RICHARD J. ROSENTHAL Westinghouse Ocean Research Laboratory San Diego, California 92121 (1 Text figure) INTRODUCTION THE TAGGING OF SUBTIDAL marine mollusks has usually been done at the surface. Most of these tagging studies have involved a small number of economically important species. Cox (1962) studied the red abalone, Haliotis rufescens SwAINSsoN, 1822, along the California coast, attaching the tags by wire threaded through the respira- tory holes of the shell. NEwMAn (1966) used a disc tag fastened by a nickel pin passing through a respiratory pore to study the movements of the South African aba- lone, H. midae LinNAEuS, 1758. More recently, FoRSTER (1967) described tagging the British ormer, H. tubercu- lata LINNAEUS, 1758, with disc tags using resin cement as an adhesive. A study being conducted off southern California by T- C. Tutschulte (personal communication) on the migratory movements of Haliotis spp. utilizes time-lapse photography and luminous tags cemented with epoxy to the shells in situ. In the first three investigations the animals were col- lected by divers and the majority of the tagging was completed above water. Surface tagging may introduce more variables than are necessary, since the organisms are removed from their normal environmental situation and exposed for a brief period of time to unnatural con- ditions. Placing the animals back in their original habitat after marking does not guarantee that they will return to a “normal” pattern of behavior. Tagging at the sur- face may also be impractical when dealing with subtidal mollusks which are solidly attached or cemented to the substrate. This study was undertaken to perfect a method for tagging hard-shelled mollusks underwater, with a mini- mum amount of disturbance to the animals and their surroundings. MATERIALS anp METHODS A commercially available non-toxic epoxy’ was used to attach the tag to the shell surface. This particular epoxy was selected because it hardens thoroughly underwater. The curing time depends on the water temperature and the thickness of the epoxy used on each shell. Mixing the resin and catalyst in a 1:1 volume on the surface was found to be the best procedure, since attempts at mixing the two components underwater proved unsatisfactory. The resin-catalyst mixture is grey-white in color, which may be suitable for mollusks having lightly pigmented shells. For those with darker shells, a black pigment can be added to darken the epoxy, thereby lessening the at- tention of predators or the attraction of curious fishes to the tagged mollusks. Engraved disc tags made from gravoply were used to increase the permanence of the number and ease of read- ing underwater. The tags and newly mixed epoxy were taken underwater in separate containers by scuba divers. When suitable animals were located, the overall shell length was recorded and the tagging region of the shell was cleaned with a wire brush. Then the epoxy was ap- plied to the mollusk shell and a numbered tag was pressed into the epoxy (Figure 1). RESULTS anv DISCUSSION A tagging experiment on Kellet’s Whelk, Kelletia kelletu (Forses, 1850) was started in December 1967 to acquire more knowledge about the ecology and life history of this marine gastropod. A total of 120 K. kelletu have been tagged in depths of 15 to 20 m of water at 3 differ- ent localities off San Diego County, California. The tag- gings have been conducted off of Point La Jolla, Mission Beach, and along an ecological survey line near Del Mar. These 3 subtidal areas were selected because they differ substantially in substrates and species composition. A great deal of the tagging took place during the reproductive season (March-June), when large numbers of these whelks were copulating and laying eggs at the 3 localities. During subsequent dives, copulation and egg laying was observed in tagged individuals — an indica- tion that the tagging had not disturbed their behavioral activities. The tags remain securely attached to the shells of the animals located to date (September 1968), 263 days after * Sea Go-In Poxy Putty — 1324; Permalite Plastics Corporation, Costa Mesa, California. Vol. 11; No. 3 THE VELIGER Page 289 the initial 11 Kelletia kelletui were tagged on December 11, 1967. Success in finding these motile benthonic ani- mals is largely dependent upon the visibility underwater, although searching from a permanently emplaced survey line eases the difficulty in locating them. Other mollusks have been successfully tagged using this method: The rock scallop, Hinnites multirugosus (GaeE, 1928); the red abalone, Haliotis rufescens; and the wavy top shell, Astraea undosa (Woop, 1828). Figure 1 The drawing shows a tagged Kelletia kelletii with a numbered disc embedded in epoxy and cemented to the dorsal region of the shell. The size of the mollusk does not present a problem, since the epoxy can be shaped to conform to the charac- teristics of the outer shell and the disc tags sized accor- dingly. This reduces any hindrance to the movement of the animal and the possibility of the epoxy coming in contact with the animal’s living tissue (Figure 1). The advantages of this technique appear to be the permanence of marking, and the fact that tagging can be completely carried out underwater with a minimum amount of disturbance to the subjects and their environ- ment. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am particularly grateful to Dr. W. D. Clarke for valuable advice and encouragement, and to Mr. R. E. Bower for technical assistance in the field. LITERATURE CITED Cox, Keitn W. 1962. California abalones, family Haliotidae. Fish Bull. 118, Calif. Dept. Fish and Game, Sacramento, Calif. Forster, G.R. 1967. The growth of Haliotis tubcrculata: results of tagging experiments in Guernsey 1963-65. Journ. Marine Biol. Assoc. U. K. 47: 287 - 300 Newman, G. G. 1966. Movements of the South African abalone Haliotis midae. Invest. Rep. Div. Sea Fish. S. Afr. No. 56: 1 - 20 RANDALL, JOHN E. 1964. Contributions to the biology of the queen conch, Strom- bus gigas, Bull. Mar. Sci. Gulf and Carib. 14 (2): 246 to 293 A Method of Color Preservation in Opisthobranch Mollusks BY GORDON A. ROBILLIARD Department of Zoology University of Washington Seattle, Washington 98105 INTRODUCTION CoLor AND COLOR PATTERN are useful taxonomic charac- ters in the opisthobranch mollusks. However, I know of no published reports describing a method of preserving color in opisthobranchs. Instead, it is usually assumed that the colors will fade or be bleached out in formalin, Page 290 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 alcohol, or other preservatives. Color is usually preserved in color photographs or field notes or both, ToyaMa & Mriyosui (1963) and WALLER & EscH- MEYER (1965) successfully employed an antioxidant, butylated hydroxytoluene (hereafter referred to as Ionol C. P. -40), to preserve some colors in fish and a prawn. WALLER & ESCHMEYER (op. cit.) used 1, 10, and 20 cc of Ionol C. P.-40 per 4500 cc of 10% formalin to make the test solutions (0.02%, 0.22%, and 0.44% concentra- tions respectively). Eighteen months later, they found that the color of fish in the 0.44% solution was best preserved, but preservation of colors of fish in other test solutions was superior to that of fish in untreated formalin solution. In this note, I report the results of testing this tech- nique on opisthobranchs from 3 orders (Cephalaspidea, Sacoglossa, and Nudibranchia) with emphasis on the nudibranchs. MATERIALS ann METHODS A stable emulsion was formed by vigorously stirring Ionol C. P. -40 into hot sea water (55° to 65° C) (Shell Tech- nical Bulletin, IC:67-16). Concentrations of Ionol C, P. -40 used in the emulsions gave final dilutions of 0.1% to 0.5% Ionol C. P. -40 by volume. Formalin was added to this emulsion to give a final concentration of 5% formalin by volume (hereafter referred to as Ionol C. P. -40 emulsion). Ionol C. P. -40 is also readily soluble in alcohol. Most of the opisthobranchs were relaxed for 1 to 5 minutes, depending on size, with succinylcholine chloride (BEEMAN, 1968). A few, especially the Cephalaspidea, were relaxed for 2 to 8 hours in propylene phenoxetol using 1% by volume of propylene phenoxetol in sea water (Owen, 1955; OWEN & STEEDMAN, 1958). Small animals (< 1.5 to 2.0cm long) were then put directly into Ionol C. P. -40 emulsion. Formalin diffuses inward rapidly enough to preserve the internal tissues. Larger animals (>2cm long) were injected with a small amount of 5% formalin in sea water without Ionol C. P. -40, to preserve the internal tissues, then put into the Ionol C. P. -40 emulsion. The Ionol C. P. -40 emulsion was not injected into the animal because it eventually forms an oily film in the body cavities and over the tissues. This is particularly un- desirable if the animals are to be dissected. In any case, there are few internal organs in an opisthobranch in which color is distinctive or taxonomically important. The method was tested on 1 sacoglossan, Elysia hedg- pethit Marcus, 1961; 2 cephalaspideans, Haminoea sp., and Aglaja diomedea (Brercu, 1893) ; and 30 species of nudibranchs of which 12 were dorids, 12 were dendro- notaceans, and 6 were aeolids. RESULTS Of the concentrations tested, 0.3% Ionol C. P. -40 emul- sion resulted in maximal color retention and was used for most of the specimens. Stored in bottles in glass-door cabinets, the specimens in Ionol C. P. -40 emulsion have been exposed to normal artificial lighting, but protected from direct sunlight, for up to 2 years. In most cases, the original color has been retained albeit with varying degrees of fading in some species. The color of virtually all specimens stored under similar conditions, but in untreated 5% formalin in sea water, has faded markedly or disappeared. Some colors are preserved better and longer than others. The yellow body color and black spots of Aniso- doris nobilis (MacFarianp, 1905) and Archidoris mon- tereyensis (Cooper, 1862) are well preserved as are the yellow and orange pigments of Triopha carpenter (Stearns, 1873). The orange on the cerata of Laila cockerelli MacFar.anp, 1905 is completely preserved while the orange on Hermissenda crassicornis (EscH- SCHOLTZ, 1831) faded slightly. Slight fading has occurred in the orange-red body color of Rostanga pulchra Mac- FarLAND, 1905. The salmon-pink body color of Tritonia festiva (STEARNS, 1873) and T: gilberti (MacFarLanp, 1966) and the orange body color of T: (Tochuina) tetra- quetra (Pauvas, 1788) fade only slightly. The same is true of the brown blotches of Diaulula sandiegensis (Cooper, 1862). Many specimens of Dendronotus spp. have been preserved in Ionol C. P. -40 emulsion and the colors — white, metallic orange, brown, magenta, yel- low, mauve, purple, pink, grey, red — have faded slightly over periods of up to 2 years. The orange body color and white spots of Dirona aurantia Hurst, 1965 and the white pigment on the cerata of D. albolineata CocKErR- ELL & Eviot, 1905 fade somewhat. The dark green body color of Elysia hedgpethi and the black (or dark purple) of Aglaja diomedea have faded very little. In a few cases, the color faded markedly or completely disappeared. The chocolate brown color of Onchidorts bilamellata (Linnaeus, 1767) faded to about a third of its original intensity. In Cadlina marginata MAcFaRLAND, 1905, the yellow pigment disappears completely within 12 to 24 hours. The yellow on the notal papillae of Acanthodoris hudsoni MacFarLanp, 1905 fades marked- ly over a week. Structural colors, such as blue on Her- muissenda crassicornis and other opisthobranchs (Burcin, Vol. 11; No. 3 THE VELIGER Page 291 1965, Bircin-Wyss, 1961) usually disappear when the animal is killed and they cannot be preserved by an antioxidant. CONCLUSION The use of an antioxidant such as Ionol C. P. -40 with a preservative seems to be a successful and relatively simple method of preserving most colors in the opisthobranchs. However, on the basis of this study, it is not possible to generalize about which colors will be preserved between different taxa or even within a certain taxon. Further experimentation with Ionol C. P. -40 will likely demon- strate a more widespread applicability as well as deline- ating more precisely which colors will or will not be preserved. The optimal concentration proved to be 0.3% Ionol C. P. -40 by volume in a solution of 5% formalin in sea water. Color retention is an obvious advantage to the taxon- omist in that it allows him to augment the description of a species. This is especially true in soft-bodied animals like opisthobranchs where color, though quite variable intraspecifically, often serves as a guide in species identi- fication. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to extend my thanks to Brian Case, University of Manitoba, for first bringing the method to my attention and to the Shell Chemical Company, Industrial Chemicals Division (Portland Office) for the sample of Ionol C. P. -40. I am grateful to Dr. Alan J. Kohn for reading the manuscript and for his suggestions. This work was sup- ported by a Special Scholarship from the National Re- search Council of Canada. LITERATURE CITED ANONYMOUS 1967. Ionol CP antioxidant. BEEMAN, Ropert Davip 1968. Order Anaspidea. prt. 2) :87- 102; plt. 11; 12 text figs. Burcin-Wyss, ULRIKE 1961. Die Riickenanhange von Trinchesia coerulea (Mon- Shell Tech. Bull. IC: 67-16 The Veliger 3 (Supplement, (1 May 1968) TAGU). Rev. Suisse Zool. 68 (4): 461 - 582; plt. Burcin, Urrike F 1965. The color pattern of Hermissenda crassicornis (Escu- scuoLtz, 1831) (Gastropoda: Opisthobranchia: Nudibranchia) The Veliger 7 (4): 205-215; 9 text figs. (1 April 1965) OweEN, GARETH 1955. Use of propylene phenoxctol as a relaxing agent. Nature 175 (4453) : 434 (5 March 1955) Owen, GareTtu « H. F. STEEDMAN 1958. Preservation of molluscs. 33 (3): 101 - 103 Toyama, Kenzo « Gota Miyosu1 1963. Prevention from color fading of aquatic animals under preservation. Journ. Tokyo Univ. Fish. 50 (1): 43-48 WALLER, RicHarp A. & WILLIAM N. EscHMEYER 1965. A method for preserving color in biological specimens. Bioscience 15 (5): 361 Proc. Malacol. Soc. London BOOKS, PERIODICALS, PAMPHLETS Between Pacific Tides by Epwarp FE Ricketts & Jack Catvin, Fourth edition, revised by Joe, W. HepcpetH. September 19, 1968. xiv +614 pp.; 8 color plates; 302 text figures. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California. $10.-. This classic work on the ecology and natural history of plants and animals inhabiting the Pacific shores in the area between the low and the high tide marks was written, originally, “for laymen, for beginners ... ” but it has filled a need far beyond that envisioned by Ed Ricketts. Because of the thoroughly annotated bibliography, the book has become an important first source for many serious investigators and an indispensable text book in many courses in invertebrate zoology. The book has gone through three previous editions, the first two by the original author, and the third edition revised by Dr. Hedgpeth. Each edition was better than the previous one, each updated to include the latest develop- ments in the fields of endeavor covered by the scope of the work. This fourth edition, again revised and brought up to date, is a worthy successor to the other three editions. Dr. Hedgpeth has brought his critical talents to bear and his influence can be perceived on practically every page, although he has managed beautifully to preserve the orig- inal charm of the book. And while a number of the illus- trations are the old familiar ones, many have been super- seded by better pictures illustrating more precisely what was desired to be called to the reader’s attention. Even the color plates have been much improved, although they may perhaps, in a future edition, be printed with a still better technique which will render the delicate colors of the intertidal area more life-like. Page 292 We can only say that this new edition is a must for the layman who wishes to become better acquainted with the seashore and its wealth of animals and plants; it is indispensable for the serious student, be he a beginner or advanced; and the professional invertebrate zoologist will find many tidbits of important knowledge in the pages of this book. There is, however, one part of the book that was not possible in the “good old days” of Ed Ricketts, a part which should be required reading not only for the student of the seashore, but for politicians and all those persons who are in a position to make policy and to decide “what is best for all.” To this portion of the book Dr. Hedgpeth brings some of his best thoughts and it is evident from these pages that “conservation” is not a sometime thing for him. It is a truly thought-provoking chapter and it alone would be worth the price of the entire book. RS Tidepool Animals from the Gulf of California by Westey M. Farmer. 70 pp.; 4 color plates (with 6 photographs each) ; 170 line drawings. Wesword Comp., Post Office Box 15333, San Diego, California 92115. Price, $6.50. Stiff paper bound. Since travel into Lower California is increasingly pop- ular, shell collectors from near (San Diego, for example) and far (New York and Teaneck, for example) roam over the sandy beaches and rocky shores of the rich Gulf of California. The climatic conditions are, during a part of the year, very agreeable and collecting thus becomes a pleasant occupation. For the Pacific coast of North America we have the book by Ricketts and Calvin, as well as a few other, more limited books to help the collector in identifying his loot. Aside from Steinbeck’s “The Sea of Cortez” there is no popularly written work available for the Gulf. Or, rather, there was, until now, no such work available. Mr. Farmer, who was Curator of exhibits at the San Diego Museum of Natural History, has brought together in this booklet a brief description accompanied by an ex- cellent pen-and-ink drawing of somewhat over 100 of the animals one is likely to encounter in the tidepools. His color photographs, especially of his favorite nudi- branchs, are superb. His descriptions are pithy and to the point. It may be anticipated that future editions will be ex- panded to include many species of invertebrates that are THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 3 relatively frequently encountered, although, perhaps not by the person casually strolling along the beaches. RS Descriptions of New Species of Gastropods from Clipperton Island by Leo G. HeErTLEIN & Epwin C. Atuison. Occas. Papers Calif. Acad. Sci. No. 66; 13 pp.; 13 figs. June 27, 1968. Nine species of some extremely small (less than 4 mm) to medium sized (50mm) snails are discussed. Six of these species are new to science. RS Kelp Habitat Improvement Project by WHEELER J. NortH. 123 pp.; 47 figures; 22 tables. Published after July 1, 1968 by the W. M. Keck Labora- tory of Environmental Health Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California. This, the fifth annual report, appears to us to be more encouraging than its predecessors inasmuch as the general outlook for the re-establishing of the once thriving kelp beds along the California coast seems more promising. Much detailed information, of value to the student of marine ecology, is contained in these pages. The conser- vationist also will take heart from the perusal of the report. RS Water Quality and Biologic Conditions South Bay Aqueduct by C. A. McCuttoueu. State of California Resources Agency, Department of Water Resources. 180 pp.; nu- merous tables; 1 multiple fold-out; 15 pages with 2 to 4 photographs. Of particular interest to the malacologist is the part of the report that deals with the Asiatic clam, Corbicula. RS Age of first Marine Terrace Near Santa Cruz, California by Witi1aAM C. BrapLey & WARREN O. AppicotTT. Geol. Soc. America Bull., vol. 79, pp. 1203-1210; 1 table; 1 fold-out insert. September 1968. THE VELIGER is open to original papers pertaining to any problem concerned with mollusks. This is meant to make facilities available for publication of original articles from a wide field of endeavor. Papers dealing with anatomical, cytological, distri- butional, ecological, histological, morphological, physiological, taxonomic, etc., aspects of marine, freshwater or terrestrial mollusks from any region, will be considered. Even topics only indirectly concerned with mollusks may be acceptable. It is the editorial policy to preserve the individualistic writing style of the author; therefore any editorial changes in a manuscript will be submitted to the author for his approval, before going to press. Short articles containing descriptions of new species or other taxa will be given preferential treatment in the speed of publication provided that arrangements have been made by the author for depositing the holotype with a recognized public Museum. Museum numbers of the type specimens must be included in the manuscript. Type localities must be defined as accurately as possible, with geo- graphical longitudes and latitudes added. Short original papers, not exceeding 500 words, may be published in the column “NOTES and NEWS’; in this column will also appear notices of meetings of regional, national and international malacological organizations, such as A.M. U., U.M.E., W.S.M., etc., as well as news items which are deemed of interest to our Members and subscribers in general. Articles on “METHODS and TECH- NIQUES” will be considered for publication in another column, provided that the information is complete and techniques and methods are capable of duplication by anyone carefully following the description given. Such articles should be mainly original and deal with collecting, preparing, maintaining, studying, photographing, etc., of mollusks or other invertebrates. A third column, entitled “INFORMA- TION DESK,” will contain articles dealing with any problem pertaining to collecting, identifying, etc., in short, problems encountered by our readers. In contrast to other contributions, articles in this column do not necessarily contain new and original materials. Questions to the editor, which can be answered in this column, are invited. The column “BOOKS, PERIODICALS, and PAMPHLETS” will attempt to bring reviews of new publications to the attention of our readers. Also, new timely articles may be listed by title only, if this is deemed expedient. Manuscripts should be typed in final form on a high grade white paper, not exceeding 81,” by 11”, at least double spaced and accompanied by a clear carbon or photo copy. A pamphlet with detailed suggestions for preparing manuscripts intended for publication in THE VELIGER is available to authors upon request. A self-addressed envelope, sufficiently large to accommodate the pamphlet (which measures 51/,” by 81”), with double first class postage, should be sent with the request to the Editor. EDITORIAL BOARD Dr. Donatp P. Assort, Professor of Biology Hopkins Marine Station of Stanford University Dr. Jerry DononvueE, Professor of Chemistry University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, and Research Associate in the Allan Hancock Foundation University of Southern California, Los Angeles Dr. J. Wyatr Duruam, Professor of Paleontology University of California, Berkeley Dr. E. W. Facer, Professor of Biology Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla University of California at San Diego Dr. Caper Hann, Professor of Zoology and Director, Bodega Marine Laboratory University of California, Berkeley Dr. G Datias Hanna, Curator Department of Geology California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco Dr. Jorn W. Hepcretu, Resident Director Marine Science Laboratory, Oregon State University Newport, Oregon Dr. Leo G. HERTLEIN, Curator of Invertebrate Paleontology California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Dr. Rupotr STroutre, Research Zoologist University of California, Berkeley Dr. A. Myra KEEN, Professor of Paleontology and Curator of Malacology Stanford University, Stanford, California Dr. Victor Loosanorr, Professor of Marine Biology Pacific Marine Station of the University of the Pacific Dr. Joun McGowan, Associate Professor of Oceanography Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla University of California at San Diego Dr. Frank A. Pireixa, Professor of Zoology University of California, Berkeley Mr. Attyn G. Smiru, Associate Curator Department of Invertebrate Zoology California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco Dr. Ratpu I. Siru, Professor of Zoology University of California, Berkeley Dr. Cuarces R. STASEK, Associate Professor of Zoology Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida Dr. Donatp M. Witson, Professor of Biology Department of Biological Sciences Stanford University, Stanford, California ASSOCIATE EDITOR Mrs. Jean M. Cate Los Angeles, California A Quarterly published by CALIFORNIA MALACOZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY, INC. Berkeley, California VOLUME II APRIL 1, 1969 NUMBER 4 ConTENTS The Muricidae of Fiji — Part II. Subfamily Thaidinae. (Plates 47 to 49; 21 Text figures; 1 Map) WaLTER OLIVER CERNOHORSKY .. . . 203 Effects of Turbidity-Producing Substances) in Shp Waren! on Gas ane anae af Three Genera of Bivalve Mollusks. (7 Text figures) Harry C. Davis & HERBERT Hipu ae Bee hae PO RSnRE | maul iia were se ONT A New Species of Murexsul (Gastropoda: Murieidae) from the Galapagos Islands. (Plate 50; 1 Text figure) WitiiaM K. Emerson & ANTHONY D’ArTILIO’. Cw “E324. Predators on Olivella biplicata, Including a Species- opecinc Pretor ‘Aveiasate Response. (Plate 51; 1 Text figure) D. Craic Epwarps . . . Ra INAS Wan A Memes 8) IMSS Eis etc i HI 8) Rediscovery of Terebra trochlea eee eee (Plate 52) Twita BRATCHER . . ‘ Bi te se Gita eRe og la eR OA: Growth Characteristics of Aenea peicons Eee cenon (4 Text figures) Ron KENNY . + . 336 Use of the Binet € asa Semis: Oran in an Peete (Gastronede: Onatey (Plate 53; 1 Text figure) Barry R. Witson . . Br eo eee 3 G40 A New Genus and Two New Species oe lay pings fom ‘Ihe Panamie Province (Gastropoda: Muricidae) . (Plate 54) HELEN DUSHANE . . » 343 Gross Anatomy and Giesineation of ie Gommensal: Gascon, \Galedonicla fone: rouzierl SOUVERBIE, 1869. (Plate 55; 4 Text figures) JosEPH ROSEWATER Wisc: - 345 A Preliminary Survey of WeaTnes or Cone: Rook abe Ndideent Areas! Gulf of California, Mexico. (1 Map) HELEN DUSHANE & ELEN DRENNAN ee) eos ee hs fe se ene) S61 [Continued on Inside Front Cover] Distributed free to Members of the California Malacozoological Society, Inc. Subscriptions (by Volume only) payable in advance to Calif. Malacozool. Soc., Inc. Volume 12: $18. Domestic; $19.- in the Americas; 19.50 in all other Foreign Countries Single copies this issue $12.-. Postage extra. Send subscription orders to Mrs. JEAN M. Caté, 12719 San Vicente Boulevard, Los Angeles, California g0049. Address all other correspondence to Dr. R. STOHLER, Editor, Department of Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720 Second Class Postage paid at Berkeley, California AS SONA JUN 17 1968 LIBRARIES ContTENTs — Continued Two New Species of the Genus Volua Ropine, 1798 (Ovulidae FLEMING, 1828). (Plate 56) CrawForp NEILL CaTE : aoe, 2 eae (G8 Zoogeographical Studies on Living Cowes (1 Map) Franz ALFRED SCHILDER : Seasonal Observations on Diet, and Stored Glycouent atid pias in dhe Home Cen. Tresus capax (GouLp, 1850). (Plate 57; 1 Text figure) Rosert G. B. Rei Seasonal Gonadal Changes in Two Bivalve Moluckoe in remales, Pay Grifter, (Plates 58 to 60; 4 Text figures; 1 Map) \, VERNON KENNETH oe |i OS ee The Shell Structure and Mineralogy of Ghana pellucida IBeOnER TT (Plates 61 to 64; 6 Text figures) Joun Davin TayLor « WILLIAM JAMES KENNEDY Molluscan Faunas of Pacific Coast Salt Marshes and Tidal Gree (1 Map) Keir B. MacponaLp von che le spor soak eee ae The Type of Tegula funebralis (A. Apts: "BER (Plate 65) RupoLF STOHLER ‘ Eee ae wy The Littorina ziczac Species Compler! (Plate 66; 4 Text figures) Tuomas V. Borkowski & MarRILyNN R. Bonen apart Spawning and Development in the Trochid Gastropod Euchelus penunan us (GouLp, 1841) in the Hawaiian Islands. (2 Text figures) Tuomas M. DucH New Records of Nudibranchs fron New Tose Rosert E. LovELAND, Gorpon HENDLER & Gary NEWKIRK ‘ Nomenclatural Changes for the New Species Assigned to Cratena by MING SARaAi, 1966. (2 Text figures) RicHarp A. ROLLER An Annotated List of Opisthobranere Gorn on ine Onen (Conny, Galera. (1 Map) RicHaArp A. ROLLER & STEVEN J. Lone A Note on the Range of Gastropteron pacificum (Onismobrenenn Corhalesatilen) (1 Map) XS Hans Brertscu ‘ PAM al Oe nd. Gl ‘An Immunological Study of Belecypod conten (3 Text figures) LARKLYN FISHER NOTES & NEWS ieee ee Ser oe An Overlooked Subcenus ond Saists from Barrie A. Myra KEEN Laternula Living on the Pacific Coast? A. Myra KEEN Sexual Dimorphism in Tegula funebralis. PETER W. FRANK Spawning Notes — III. Strombina maculosa. Fay Henry WOLFSON Spawning Notes — IV. Cerithium stercusmuscarum. Fay Henry WOLFSON BOOKS, PERIODICALS & PAMPHLETS - 364 = 307 5 yi) . 382 - 391 2 B89) . 408 . 410 9 43i'5) . 418 . 421 = 424 » 431 - 434 - 439 - 444 Note: The various taxa above species are indicated by the use of different type styles as shown by the following examples, and by increasing indentation. ORDER, Suborder, DIVISION, Subdivision, SECTION, SUPERFAMILY, Famity, Subfamily, Genus, (Subgenus) New Taxa Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Page 293 The Muricidae of Fiji Part II — Subfamily Thaidinae BY WALTER OLIVER CERNOHORSKY Vatukoula, Fiji Islands, and Division of Mollusks, Smithsonian Institution U.S. National Museum, Washington, D.C. 20560 (Plates 47 to 49; 21 Text figures; 1 Map) THIS IS THE NINTH PART in the series of faunal mono- graphs dealing with the marine mollusca of the Fiji Islands; it is the second part of the Muricidae of Fiji, the first having been published by the author in 1967. Species recorded from Fiji have an Indo-Pacific distri- bution and none of the species is endemic to the Fiji Islands. For notes on the geography of the Fiji Islands and other pertinent data see CERNoHOoRSKY, 1964. TAXONOMY The systematics of the muricid subfamily Thaidinae is presently in a state of flux. Several applications are pend- ing with the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (BRADLEY & PaLMer, 1963; Keen, 1964, 1964a) for either a suppression or validation of thaidine genera, type species and even family groups. Since rulings by the ICZN on these applications cannot be anticipated, pre-application taxonomy has largely been adopted. Existing taxonomic treatments of the thaidine group are not only few but highly conflicting in opinion; some workers retain the thaidine group of species within the family Muricidae while others assign them to a separate family Thaididae. Powerit (1962) arranged the Neo- zelanic species of Thais s. 1. under the family Thaisidae. IREDALE & McMicuHaev (1962) accorded familial rank to East Australian Thaidinae, Typhinae and Trophoninae. Keen (1958) considers West American Trophoninae and Typhinae to be of muricid stock but separates Thaididae as a separate family. Workers who study the shell, animal, ecology, and em- bryology of thaidine species as a single biological unit disagree with an elevation of Thaidinae to familial rank and consider the various muricid groups under discussion to be of a common phylogenetic origin. Cooke (1919), TuieEre (1929), ARAKAwa (1962), Wu (1965a), Hane & Kosuce (1966, 1967), and Orr-Maes (1967) are some of the workers who retain thaidine genera in the family Muricidae. As far as tropical Pacific thaidine species are concerned, there seems to be little or no zoological reason for a separation from the Muricidae. In shell morphology, animal, anatomy, radula, habitat, feeding requirements, and geographical distribution, Thaidinae are so closely related to other muricid genera that existing natural af- finities and common phylogenetic origin can hardly be concealed. There is no decided gap between the tritonali- ine genera Urosalpinx Stimpson, 1865 and Muricopsis Bucguoy, DauTZENBERG & Bouce, 1882, on the one hand and the Morula-Cronia group in Thaidinae on the other; here the characters are transitional and rather nebulous. THE THAIDINE RADULA A generic grouping based on shell characters alone dis- agrees with a classification based on radula features. Cooke (1919) contended that “an examination of the radula of the various specis of Thais lends little support to the groupings of that genus, based on the forms of the shell, to which are given the names of Stramonita, Tribulus, Polytropa, Thalessa, etc.’ He indicated that certain groupings are desirable, but rather in a different direction. How generic groupings based on shell characters alone cut right across an arrangement based on radular evi- dence is best illustrated by Mancinella Linx, 1807. The two species M. mancinella (Linnazus, 1758) and M. tuberosa (ROpiNG, 1798) do have a common radula pat- tern which differs from radula features of some species of Thalessa H. & A. Apams, 1853 and would support a generic separation based on shell characters (lirate lab- rum). Thais aculeata Desuayes, 1844 (= T. hippocas- Page 294 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 tanum auctt.) is generally assigned to Thalessa on the basis of shell characters, but belongs to Mancinella on the basis of radula features. The radula of the type spe- cies of Thais Ropinc, 1798, i.e. T: nodosa (LINNAEUS, 1758) is of the same pattern as the radula of the Man- cinella group, according to Cooxe’s description (op. cit., as T. neritoides); the variant Thais nodosa var. ascension- is (Quoy & Gammarp, 1833) [== T. meretricula Rovine, 1798] has, however, the radular pattern of Thalessa. It is realized that there is a certain amount of variation in muricid radula pattern within a species, but the differ- ences between the radula of a species and a varicty as described by Cooke (op. cit.) exceed the expected range of variation. Should Cooxe’s results prove to be correct, and Thais nodosa and the variety T: meretricula are in- deed conspecific, then the variability of the thaidine radula is much ercater than anticipated. The radulae of the Thais-Mancinella-Thalessa group shade through gradual stages from a simple tricuspid rhachidian of Afancinella to the claborate pattern of Thais and Thalessa with bifid side cusps, numerous side denticles and prominent outer cusps. The radulae of Drupa Rovinc, Drupella Tuireve, Drupina Dart and Morula ScuiuMACHER have a sufficiently modified radula and shell to merit recognition of these groups as full genera. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to record my thanks to Dr. Harald A. Rehder, Smithsonian Institution, U.S. National Museum, Wash- ington, for the research facilities made available by the Division of Mollusks, and for his valuable discussions and opinions on nomenclatural problems. Thanks are due to Dr. E. Binder, Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle, Geneva; Dr. N. Tebble, British Museum (Nat- ural History) London and Mr. J. O'Grady, Linnean Socicty, London, for the opportunity afforded me to examine the type collections of Muricidae in these Insti- tutions. Fiji collectors have generously made available their collections for this study, and my thanks are due to Mr. and Mrs. R. I Browne, Nausori; Mr. and Mrs. FE Freitag, Suva; Mr. E. Gardner, Suva; Mrs. C. Jameson, Lautoka; and Mr. A. Jennings, Auckland, New Zcaland. This work was supported (in part) by a National Research Council postdoctoral Research Associateship with the Smithsonian Institution, U.S. National Museum, Washington. INDEX ( * indicates a homonym or synonym) aculeata Drsuaves ( Thais) 295 clathrata (Drupa) 298n |) Sailinstrisc WOOD) pesete rae 2098 * aculcata Link 296 | * concatenalus . 306 | * indigoferum * affine . 298 | * confragosa 311 | * infwmata * affinis 295 cornus (Drupella) 3 SOV |) CAIRO! cxcimercmnerernarenconcec * alba Womnron & JAQuINOT 304 | * dactylordes 303 intermedia (Thais) co. * alba More 310 | * dealbata GYOV.L, || HOMOMPV —coemnseererumronsancn ecerncetin con snienranene * albolabris . 299 | * digitata 303 * Taurentiana * alouina .. 296 | * churnca 304 | * lobata * ambusta . 309 | * echinata . 309 | * major . anaxercs (Mforula) 307 caregius (Maculotriton) » BID mancilla eae 304 * andrewst 309 | * clata . 304 mancinella (Mancinella) occccoecuennen 296 angulata (Drupella) 306 fixcclla Guiviin (Morula) 5 Ru margariticola (MOrUIA) cececccncunne 312 * angulalum 309 | * fiseclla BustINVILLE . 312 marginatra (Drupa) a. 298 * arachnoides GEXGVGY || UU PRCLCOLAE essteae ee nseerceet ae ne ear dhens 306 | * martiniana armigera (Thais) 295 | * fusca . 298 | * miticula | 2 @SIWOMO. porcecenernre HO) || fMOGKCOMUGIE croocerteesrmrcom txconnerrriernensooscen 298 MIOTILUP ONG! Pe cninscmicnumdna:t atc.csee nee aurantiaca (Morula) 311 | * gemmulata 296 morum (Drupa) .. * bicalenala 308 | * glacialis 296 | * morus biconica (Morula) - 308 | * glossularia BYOB. || ACISTVONCOR caraos stoinccanstensanseterorrscos * canccllala 307 granulata (Morula) 308 | * nassoides . * castanca 297 grossularia (DrUpinad) coe GIO) |) 2 GAGINNCNELS WAVE: canorennomnm * castancum . 297 | * hederacca : 313 | * nenitordea . * ceylonica . 308 | * hippocastanum auct. POR || WCRROICHS swrnvanreccomomorseer * chaidca Orr-Mars 304 | * Iippocastanum Woon .. 301 nodicostata (Morula) ccc * chrysalis . MOOR Pion day acne ee aaadronesuncmen nna PHOKS) |) PORMYOCRE crrrsrecrrseeccertereeecransrees * chrysostoma so SX) |] HAG INMTITS WANS cxcirnconncconommscer FON |) POGUE crmunscemaxcammmrenoreiiae * cingulifera 308 | * hystrix LINNAEUS .. . 299 Ochrostoma (Drupella) voces Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Page 295 "9 ALE OANGNGTORY rae See cee ert rape Pee ey 310 | * rubuscaestwm KIRA wissen QO SMa na Tell ammeter sen ienumnnmmeenean og parva (MOrula) vrcmesmcnnnnnnennunnnnn 309 | * rubuscaesius HIRASE & TAKI wins PSS} | NS CH AYE) aul hee re a ee 297 S111 CORMe et rae ne eee ee OOH TLD USC LESLUS INODING | aomrenntstiect tee er PHOR) || HAYS HIOUE, cerccerctcerrceeacetreceeeert terete 311 * picta RODING ...... 313 rubusidaeus (Drupa) .. Bon |) * tribulus vec. . 299 * picta SWAINSON 1. 313 rugosa (Drupella) . 306 | * tuberculata . 308 * pseudohippocastanum . 205 serta (Nassa) wu. . 313 tuberosa (Mancinella) w 297 "GO OTOOGDOTE ccmmmrecrtemimeerermemnncremmees SXOS),|| GAC DVORS cocemmmnmmcacommvesnemmnm 6{)! HC WORN) ccarcrrmmronmirerseceemrmaerecn, GO) PRTC CON CMe rene mere ene One a RULE her Ot | prrae SPE CETILINN \acnite Santee tr etatetus cant nisnciactstonicont BOM MCA TECDILIS i ise rrenctrnrcetse ones comin eee ace 308 PRET TLV SSCL teeter iste erste cen 312 | * sphaeridea ...... « 310 wevill mn (Veoill a) ieee teen ee nenane 313 ricinus LINNAEUS (Drupa) 299 spinosa (Morula) PHS OG a |e ULOLA Ge armen eee sl mene ene tenes es 298 STIGINUS\VIOOD Ee seeteer eres Bog | A stellaris, vnc: meSile |) a Wittenselen 304 San UDIUSGACSIOWEAIRASE)eenatee een YOKE) |) OCHIOUDO: ceerrecertacer eterna ccc BION aCe NS tS yteanece ee en eee teenie renee ies 304. EGON IAL A te rrersstonen stn sterteeittee tanemtesa teens QQ NEOGASTROPODA Type Locality: None. Habitat: On reefs, under coral and basalt rocks, in shal- MuRICACEA low water. Uncommon. Distribution: Throughout the Fiji Islands. — Indo-Pacific. AiroRierD Discussion: Murex hippocastanum Linnarus, 1758 is Thaidinae not the Thais hippocastanum of authors. The Linnaean Thais Rovinc, 1798 Thais Ropinc, 1798, Mus. Bolten., p. 54. Type species by SD (Stewart, 1927) T: lena Ropvtinc, 1798 = Nerita no- dosa LinNAEus, 1758 Thais aculeata (DESHAYES & MILNE Epwarps, 1844) (Plate 47, Figure 1) — Thais hippocastanum auctt. (non Murex hippocastanum Linnaeus, 1758) 1822. Purpura hippocastanum Lamarck, Anim. s. vert., 7: 258 (non Murex hippocastanum LinnaEvs, 1758) 1836. Purpura hippocastanum Kiener, Spec. gén. icon. coq. viv., 7: 52; pl. 12, figs. 33, 33a (non Murex hip pocastan- um LinnAEus, 1758) 1844. Purpura aculeata DEsHAYES & MILNE Epwarps, Anim. s. vert., 10: 104 (nom. nov. pro P hippocastanum Krener, 1836) 1919. Thais hippocastanum Lamarck, Cooke, Proc. Malacol. Soc. London, 13: 95 (descr. radula) (non Murex hippo- castanum LINNAEUS, 1758) 1929. Purpura (Thalessa) pseudohippocastanum DaAvutTzEN- BERG, Contrib. Faun. Madag., p. 221 (nom. nov. pro P. hippocastanum KiENER, 1836) Shell: Dirty grey in colour, nodules occasionally dark brown. Sculptured with 4 rows of blunt or spinose nodes on the body whorl and 1 - 2 rows on earlier whorls; in- terstices spirally striate. Interior of aperture bluish-white or light violet, edge of labial lip purplish-brown and denticulate; columella chocolate-brown, occasionally banded with white, sculptured anteriorly with 1 - 2 weak plicae. L: 24-55mm; W: 66-79%; HA: 63 - 75% collection of the Linnean Society in London contains 3 specimens in the box for Murex hippocastanum which represent 2 different species; one specimen is the Man- cinella tuberosa (ROp1NG, 1798) and 2 specimens are the Volema galeodes (LAMARCK, 1822). LinNAgus’ taxon cannot be simply ignored, and the most appropriate spe- cimens conforming to Linnagus’ diagnosis and figure citations must be selected to serve as types of Murex hippocastanum. The following are here selected as types: Lectotype: length- 53.7 mm; width- 44.7 mm; height of aperture- 46.8mm; this specimen has “Mur. B” written on the labrum and “545” on the columella. Para- lectotype: length- 39.0mm; width- 31.8mm; height of aperture - 34.2 mm. These 2 specimens are conspeci- fic with the Pyrula galeodes Lamarck, 1822. The third specimen (53.4 < 47.2 33.5mm) is the species Gale- odes tuberosa ROpinc, 1798, and should be excluded from the type series. Thais armigera (Linx, 1807) (Plate 47, Figure 2) 1807. Mancinella armigera Linx, Beschr. Nat. Samml. Univ. Rostock, p. 115 1846. Purpura affinis ReEve, Conch. Icon., 3, pl. 13, sp. 77 1919. Thais armigera “CHEMNITZ”, Cooxe, Proc. Malacol. Soc. London, 13: 92, fig. 10 (radula) Shell: Dirty-white in colour, occasionally ornamented with brown bands. Body whorl sculptured with 2 - 4 spiral rows of prominent somewhat spinose nodes, earlier whorls with a single row; interstices spirally corded. Aper- ture wide, white to yellowish in colour, edge of labial lip Page 296 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 flecked with brown, denticulate; columella white, irreg- ularly banded with fawn or chocolate-brown, anteriorly with weak or prominent plicae. L: 40 - 98.0 mm; W: 65-80%; HA: 56-61% Type Locality: None. Habitat: On reefs, under coral rocks, in shallow water. Moderately common. Distribution: Throughout the Fiji Islands, — Indo-Pacific. Thais intermedia (KiENER, 1835) (Plate 47, Figure 3) 1835. Purpura intermedia KiENER, Spec. gén. icon. coq. viv., 7: 51; pl. 12, figs. 34, 34a 1919. Thais hippocastanum var. intermedia KIENER, COOKE, Proc. Malacol. Soc. London, 13: 95, fig. 4 (radula) Shell: Similar in form, size and sculpture to Thais acule- ata but differing in apertural features. The aperture is white, the edge of the labial lip has 4 - 5 squarish choco- late-brown blotches and 25 - 30 small and sharp exterior denticles; interior denticles white and round, numbering from 9 - 13. L: 30-50 mm; W: 63 - 70%; HA: 57 - 64% Type Locality: Les cétes du Sénégal, Océan des Grandes Indes, et la mer Pacifique. Habitat: On reefs, under coral rocks, in shallow water. Moderately rare. Distribution: North and West Viti Levu. — Indo-Pacific. Mancinella Linx, 1807 Mancinella Linx, 1807, Beschr. Nat. Samml. Univ. Rostock, 3te Abth., p. 115. Type species by T Murex mancinella Linnaeus, 1758 Mancinella mancinella (LINNAEUS, 1758) (Plate 47, Figure 4; Text figure 1) 1758. Murex mancinella LinNAEUuS, Syst. Nat., ed. 10: p. 751 1798. Volema alouina R6pinc, Mus. Bolten., p. 58 1798. Volema glacialis R6pinc, Mus. Bolten., p. 58 1807. Mancinella aculeata Linx, Beschr. Nat. Samml. Univ. Rostock, p. 115 1816. Purpura gemmulata Lamarck, Tabl. Encycl. Méthod., p. 2; pl. 397, figs. 3a, 3b 1822. Purpura mancinella Lamarck, Anim. s. vert., 7: 239 Shell: Globose, yellowish to reddish orange in colour, irregularly flecked with white. Sculptured with 4 spiral rows of sharp or blunt spines and spiral cords. Aperture wide, labrum with orange lirae, columella smooth or irregularly plicate. Radula: Odontophore 10.9 mm long and 0.24 mm wide in an individual with a shell 52.7 mm in length; rows 100p Ee) Sem Figure 1 Mancinella mancinella (LINNAEUS) half row of radular teeth Fiji Islands of teeth number 159 (plus 13 nascentes). Rhachidian with a long central cusp, intermediate denticles lacking, side-cusps bifid, and laterals simple and curved. L: 25-60mm; W: 72-80%; HA: 65 - 73% Type Locality: None. Habitat: On reefs, under coral rocks, in shallow water. Moderately common. Distribution: Throughout the Fiji Islands. — Indo-Pacific. Discussion: E. A. SmitH (1913) in an article on Murex mancinella LINNAEUS pointed out that the Linnaean taxon is a composite species, but failed to designate a type or restrict the usage of M. mancinella. The Linnae- an collection in London contains 3 specimens in a box for M. mancinella, which were isolated by HANLEY when Explanation of Plate 47 Figure 1: Thais aculeata (DESHAYES) « 0.75 Figure 2: Thais armigera (Link) x 0.75 Figure 3: Thais intermedia (KIENER) xX 1.0 Figure 4: Mancinella mancinella (LINNAEUS) xX 1.0 Figure 5: Mancinella tuberosa (Ropinc) x Oo Figure 6: Drupa clathrata (LAMaARcK) x 1.2 Figure 7: Drupa morum Ropinc X1.2 Figure 8: Drupa ricinus (LinNarus) - White form X15 Figure 8a: Drupa ricinus (LINNAEUS) - Orange spotted form x 1.5 Figure 9: Drupa marginatra (BLAINVILLE) xX 1.0 Figure 10: Drupa rubusidaeus RopiING x tO Figure 10a: Drupa rubusidaeus ROpING X 1.0 THE VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 4 [CeERNOHORSKY] Plate 47 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 8 Figure 8 a Figure 9 Figure 10 Figure 10 a photographs by W. O. CernoHorsky Vol. 11; No. 4 he examined the collection: 2 specimens are the species Drupa cornus Roévinc, 1798 and 1 specimen is the Man- cinella mancinella of authors. LinNAEvs’ original de- scription applies only to the M. mancinella of authors, not to the Drupa cornus Ropinc. LinnaEus described the aperture of Murex mancinella as toothless, but both specimens of Drupa cornus in the Linnaean collec- tion have 5-6 prominent labial denticles. To preserve the usage of Mancinella mancinella of authors, the fol- lowing specimen is designated here as the lectotype of Murex mancinella LinnAEus: length- 41.6mm; width - 30.9 mm; height of aperture - 27.7 mm; the shell has 16 orange labral lirae and represents the species Man- cinella mancinella of authors. The other two specimens (43.2 25.8 & 22.4mm and 35.5 & 23.9 & 22.8mm) have the number “544” marked on the columella; on the larger specimen the number “762” has been obliterated. These 2 specimens are the Drupa cornus ROp1NG and are excluded from the type series; they were either added by Linnagus after 1758 or were erroneously selected by HANLEy as types of Murex mancinella. Mancinella tuberosa (RopiNc, 1798) (Plate 47, Figure 5; Text figure 2) 1798. Galeodes tuberosa Rovinc, Mus. Bolten., p. 53, No. 679 1798. Drupa trapa Ropinc, Mus. Bolten., p. 56, No. 709 1798. Vasum castaneum Ropinc, Mus. Bolten., p. 57, No. 716 1807. Mancinella castanca Linx, Beschr. Nat. Samml. Univ. Rostock, 3te Abth., p. 115 1832. Purpura pica BuainvittE, Nouv. Ann. Mus. Hist. Nat., 1: 213; pl. 9, fig. 9 1907. Purpura pica var. major Couturier, Journ. Conchyl. 55: 142 Shell: Dirty white in colour, nodes flecked with brown. Sculptured with 2 rows of angulate nodes on the body whorl and smaller nodules towards the base; interstices spirally striate. Aperture wide, yellowish in colour, edge of labial lip with small and numerous denticles and blackish spots; the labrum has prominent orange lirae, the columella has small plicae anteriorly. Operculum has either an offcentral or lateral nucleus. Radula: Odontophore 15.6 mm long and 0.27 mm wide in an animal with a shell 49.5 mm in length; rows of teeth number 196 (plus 13 nascentes). Rhachidians with a long central cusp, intermediate denticles simple, outer cusps prominent; laterals simple. L: 30-60 mm; W: 67-77%; HA: 63-73% Type Locality: None. Habitat: On reefs, under coral rocks, in shallow water. Moderately common. THE VELIGER Page 297 100u Figure 2 Mancinella tuberosa (Ropinc) Fiji Islands half row of radular teeth Distribution: Throughout the Fiji Islands. — Indo-Pacific. Discussion: Mancinella tuberosa is the type species of Menathais Irepate, 1937. The radula of Mancinella tuberosa is basically similar to the radula of M. manci- nella; both species have a lirate labrum. Cooke (1919) figured a radula of M. mancinella (as Thais gemmulata) which had a rhachidian with simple side-cusps and no intermediate denticles whatever, and M. tuberosa (as Thais pica) with rhachidians equipped with short inter- mediate denticles. It is obvious that the presence or ab- sence of intermediate denticles is a variable character. Drupa Ropine, 1798 Drupa Ropinc, 1798, Mus. Bolten., p. 55. Type species by SD (RoverETO, 1899) D. morum Ropine, 1798 Discussion: Suter (1913) is generally credited with the type species designation; however, RovERETo’s (1899) designation is an earlier one. The radula of Urosalpinx cinereus (Say, 1824), the type species of Uvosalpinx Stimpson, 1865, as figured by Stimpson (1865), does not differ in basic features from the radula of the Drupa group. It is suggested that Urosalpinx, on the basis of shell and radula characters, would be more properly placed in the Thaidinae than in the Tritonaliinae. HerTLEIN (1960) differentiates Drupa ROpinc from Morula ScHUMACHER by the feature of grouped and un- grouped labial denticles respectively. This feature is not constant, as both types of denticles can occur in the same species. The radula of Drupa species differs from those of Morula in one essential characteristic: the side-denticles of the rhachidians in Drupa are bifid to quadrifid, but are always simple in Morula and the subgenus Cronia H. « A. ADAMS. Page 298 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 For a discussion on Canrena Linx, 1807, see under Drupa morum Ropine. Drupa clathrata (LAaMarck, 1816) (Plate 47, Figure 6) 1816. Ricinula clathrata Lamarck, Tabl. Encycl. Mécth., p. 2; pl. 395, figs. 5a, 5b 1828. Murex hystrix Woop, Ind. Test., pl. 26, fig. 50 (non Linnaeus, 1758) 1936. Drupa rubuscaesia BottTEN-ROpinc, Hirase, Col. Jap. shells, p. 79; pl. 110, fig. 10 (non D. rubuscaesius ROp- Inc, 1798) 1951. Drupa rubuscaesius Ropinc, Hirase & Taxkt, Handb. illust. shells col., pl. 110, fig. 10 (non Ropine, 1798) 1959. Drupa rubuscaesium Ropinc, 1798, Kira, Col. Ill. shells Japan, 1: 58; pl. 23, fig. 9 (non D. rubuscaesius Rop- ING, 1798) Shell: Light fawn to yellowish in colour, window-like in- terstices dark brown. Sculptured with about 6 spiral rows of spinose nodules on the body whorl, earlier whorls with a single row; interstices spirally corded. Edge of labial lip orange-brown, ornamented with bifid or trifid dent- icles; columella violet posteriorly, plicae white, inter- stices orange-brown. Operculum moderately thin, orange- brown in colour and with a lateral nucleus. L: 25-35 mm; W: 80-87%; HA: 72 - 86% Type Locality: None. Habitat: On reefs, under coral rocks, in shallow water. Moderately rare. Distribution: Throughout the Fiji Islands. — Indo-Pacific. Discussion: Hepitey (1913) initiated the erroneous as- sumption that Drupa clathrata is synonymous with D. rubuscaesius, and several authors have adopted this taxo- nomic treatment. R6prnc referred to Martini (1777), plate 102, figures 976 and 977 for his species; the figures cited are a convincing likeness of the orange-flecked form of Drupa ricinus (LINNAEUS). Drupa marginatra (BLAINVILLE, 1832) (Plate 47, Figure 9; Text figure 3) 1832. Purpura marginatra BLAINVILLE, Nouv. Ann. Mus. Hist. Nat. 1: 218; pl. 10, fig. 1 1853. Purpura infumuta HomBRON & JaQuiNoT, Voy. Pole Sud Ast. & Zélée, Atlas, pl. 22, figs. 13, 14° 1854. Purpura infumata HomBRON & JAQUINOT, Voy. Pole Sud Astr. « Zélée, text, p. 85 (emend.) 1862. Ricinula fusca Ktster, Conch. Cab. 2nd ed., 3: 26; pl. 4, fig. 16 1862. Sistrum affine Pease, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, p. 244 1871. Purpura (Sistrum) fusco-nigra DUNKER, Malak. Blatter, 18: 154 1901. Sistrum indigoferum MeEtvitt, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 7: 551; pl. 9, fig. 1 Shell: Dirty grey to dark brown in colour; sculptured with coarse and blunt nodules, interstices of nodules ei- ther grooved or scaly. Aperture wide, dark chocolate to purplish-brown; labial lip with 4-5 denticles, columella with obsolete plicae. The interior of the aperture either bluish-white, violet, or brownish-purple, and lirate. Peri- ostracum thick, brown in colour. Radula: Odontophore 3.1 mm long, 0.14 mm wide in an animal with a shell 17.8 mm long; rows of teeth number 171 (plus 9 nascentes). The central cusp of the rhachi- dian is simple, intermediate denticles are absent and the 100n Da ey Figure 3 Drupa marginatra (BLAINVILLE) Fiji Islands half row of radular teeth side cusps are trifid. Side-denticles number from 4 to 6. L: 14-26mm; W: 69-75% HA: 67 - 75% Type Locality: fles Samoa. Habitat: Under basalt rocks, near the high tide level. Common. Distribution: Throughout the Fiji Islands. — Indo-Pacific. Drupa morum Ropinc, 1798 (Plate 47, Figure 7; Text figure 4) 1798. Drupa morum Répinc, Mus. Bolten., p. 55, No. 694 1807. Canrena neritoidca Linx, Beschr. Nat. Samml. Univ. Rostock, 3te Abth., p. 126 (restricted to Martint, 1777, 3, pl. 101, figs. 972, 973) 1816. Ricinula horrida Lamarck, Tabl. Encycl. Méth., p. 1; pl. 395, figs. la, 1b 1817. Ricinella violacea ScHUMACHER, Ess. nouv. syst., p. 240 Shell: Creamy-white in colour, ornamented with dark brown nodes. Sculptured with 5 - 6 spiral rows of nodules on the body whorl and a single row on earlier whorls; interstices spirally lirate. Aperture constricted, light or dark violet, labial lip with 2 groups of multiple denticles and 2 single denticles, columella plicate anteriorly. Oper- culum dark brown with a lateral nucleus. Radula: Odontophore 11.0 mm long and 0.19 mm wide in an animal with a shell 39.3 mm in length; rows of Vol. 11; No. 4 ; 100n Figure 4 Drupa morum RODING Fiji Islands ‘half row of radular teeth teeth number 275 (plus 16 nascentes). Rhachidian with a simple central cusp, prominent bifid or trifid side-cusps and 5 - 7 side-denticles. L: 25-42mm; W: 82-94%; HA: 80-90% Type Locality: None. Habitat: In crevices of reefs and under coral rocks, in shallow water. Common. Distribution: Throughout the Fiji Islands. — Indo-Pacific. Discussion: On the basis of Linx’s (1807) cited refer- ences, his Canrena neritoidea is a composite species. The cited figures from Martini (1777, pl. 101, figs. 972, 973) represent the species Drupa morum Roopinec, and have also been cited by ROpinc (1798) for his species; the other cited figures from Martini (pl. 102, figs. 976 to 979) are Drupa grossularia Ropinc, 1798 (figs. 978, 979 only). To prevent Canrena Linx, 1807, being uti- lized as an earlier name for Drupina Dat1, 1923, figures 972 and 973 on plate 101 in Martini (1777) are here designated as the lectotype representatives of Canrena neritoidea Link. Canrena neritoidea is the type species of Canrena Link by monotypy, and thus becomes an objective synonym of Drupa Répine. Drupa ricinus (LinnaEus, 1758) (Plate 47, Figures 8, 8a; Text figures 5, 6) 1758. Murex ricinus LINNAEUS, Syst. Nat., ed. 10, p. 750, No. 464 (orange-spotted form and white form) 1758. Murex hystrix LINNAEUS, Syst. Nat., ed. 10, p. 750, no. 468 (? specim. juv.) 1798. Drupa tribulus Ropinc, Mus. Bolten., p. 55, No. 695 1798. Drupa rubuscaesius Ropinc, Mus. Bolten., p. 55, No. 696 (orange-spotted form) 1816. Ricinula arachnoides Lamarck, Tabl. Encycl. Méth., p. 1; pl. 395, figs. 3a, 3b (orange-spotted form) 1832. Purpura albo-labris BuratnvittE, Nouv. Ann. Mus. Hist. Nat., 1: 208; pl. 9, fig. 5 (white form) THE VELIGER Page 299 Shell: White in colour, nodules dark brown. Generally sculptured with 5 spiral rows of blunt or spinose brown nodules, earlier whorls with a single row; interstices spi- rally lirate. Aperture narrow, and either pure white or flecked with orange; the orange flecks are situated op- 100p » Figure 5 Drupa ricinus (LINNAEUS) - white form Fiji Islands a. half row of radular teeth b. part of rhachidian showing variation of cusps c. penis posite the nodules on the labial lip, one pair of flecks borders the anal canal and a single orange streak is situated on the columellar side of the siphonal canal. Labial denticles are generally grouped, the columella is prominently plicate. Radula: Odontophore 6.2 mm long and 0.11 mm wide in an animal with a shell 25.0 mm in length; rows of teeth number 204 (plus 19 nascentes). Rhachidian with a simple central cusp, side-cusps long or short, bifid to quadrifid, side denticles number from 2 - 3; laterals are simple. L: 18-32mm; W: 84- 107%; HA: 82-94% Type Locality: O. Asiatico. Habitat: In crevices of coral rocks, on algae-matted reef platforms, in shallow water. Common. Distribution: Throughout the Fiji Islands. — Indo-Pacific. Discussion: Authors usually separate the form with a pure white aperture as Drupa albolabris (BLatNnviLLe) and the form with an orange-flecked aperture as D. arachnoides Page 300 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 (Lamarck). The Linnaean type-series of Murex ricinus consists of 3 specimens: 1 specimen is the form with the white aperture, another specimen is the orange-spotted form and the third specimen is juvenile. Linnaeus’ speci- ' 100p \ ATR ws Figure 6 Drupa ricinus (LINNAEUS) - orange spotted form Fiji Islands a. half row of radular teeth b. part of rhachidian showing variation of cusps fic name is therefore applicable to cither form. The specific validity of the 2 forms has been open to question, and a more detailed study of this common spe- cies was indicated. In the notes which follow, the form with a pure white aperture will be referred to as the “white form” and the form with orange flecks as the “orange-spotted form.” Seven localities right around Viti Levu, a circumfer- ence of approximately 320 miles, were sampled, and these will be referred to as stations A to G. Station A: Nananu-i-Ra Island, off the North coast of Viti Levu: Both forms occur in about equal numbers and share the same habitat. Station B: Islands of the Mamanuca group: Both forms occur in about equal numbers and share the same habitat. Station C: Manava Island, off the coast of Northwest Viti Levu: the orange-spotted form is rather more numerous than the white form, but they share the same habitat. Station D: Nadroga reef, extending from Cuvu to Koro- levu, a distance of approximately 40 miles: Both forms are represented in about equal numbers and share the same habitat. Station E: Namagumagua village, South Viti Levu: Col- lecting in January 1968 produced only the orange- spotted form and not a single specimen of the white form; however, 10 miles further west and one day later, both forms were found on the same reef, under the same conditions. Station F: Rat-Tail Passage, main Suva reef: Here the orange-spotted form was more numerous than the white form, but both shared the same habitat. Station G: Viti Levu Bay, Northeast of Viti Levu: Both forms occur in about the same numbers and share the same habitat. Habitat: Both forms of the species are rare in muddy- sand localities of Northern Viti Levu coastal reefs; the species is more common in clean coral sand localities of Southern coastal reefs. The species occurs in great num- bers on algae-matted reef platforms and is more frequent towards the reef-edge. It also lives in cracks and crevices of reefs without algal matting and is also found on the underside of coral rocks. Both forms may be found on the same recf only a few feet apart or under the same coral rock. Shell Morphology: Apart from the different colouring of the aperture, there is no single diagnostic character which would separate the species; in beach-worn condition the 2 forms cannot be separated. The majority of specimens of the orange-spotted form generally have 7 orange spots which are arranged as fol- lows: 2 spots border the anal canal (1 on each side), 1 spot is situated opposite the first quadrifid group of labial denticles, another spot opposite the bifid labial denticle, and a spot each is situated opposite the single anterior denticles; 1 spot is placed on the columellar side of the siphonal canal. Occasional specimens show an orange line on the edge of the columella. Specimens have been collected which are obvious inter- grades between the 2 colour-forms: specimens with a pure white aperture, apart from a thin orange line on the labial lip; specimens with either 1 or 2 single orange spots near the anal canal, and specimens with a single orange spot on the labial lip. Radula: No constant difference could be observed in ei- Explanation of Plate 48 Figure 11: Drupina grossularia (ROpING) xX 1.5 Figure 12: Drupella cornus (Ropinc) - Female XK 1.5 Figures 12a, 12b: Drupella cornus (Ropinc) - Males x 1.75 Figure 13: Morula biconica (BLAINVILLE) X 2.0 Figures 14, 14a: Drupella ochrostoma (BLAINVILLE) X .2.0 Figures 15, 15a: Drupella rugosa (Born) Figure 16: Drupella cf. D. angulata (REEVE) X 1.75 X 2.25 Figures 16a, 16b: Drupella cf. D. angulata (REEVE) X 2.25 Figures 17, 17a: Morula anaxeres (KIENER) X 2.0 Figure 18: Morula biconica (BLAINVILLE) X 2.0 THE VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 4 [CeRNOHORSKY] Plate 48 Figure 12 Figure 12 a Figure 12 b Figure 13 Figure 15 Figure 15 a Figure 16 Figure 16 a Figure 16 b Figure 17 Figure 17 a Figure 18 photographs by W. O. CernoHorsky Wole tl Noy 4 ther the pattern of the rhachidians or laterals, nor in the ratio of length : width of the odontophore or in the oc- currence of either bifid, trifid, or quadrifid side-cusps. Wu (1965) was unable to find any constant differences in the radula of both forms, but pointed out that one form had more numerous side-denticles than the other; this feature I found extremely variable in both forms (see Text figures). Sexual Dimorphism of the Shell: None was observed; the white and orange-spotted forms occur in both males and females. Sexual Dimorphism of the Radula: None was observed ; variations which do exist are erratic in both males and females of both forms. Penis: The muriciform penis is common to both colour forms and is appreciably different from the tubular penis of Drupella THIELE. Stomach Pouch: This was found to be either orange-red or brown in both colour forms of both sexes. Gut Content: Same in both forms, consisting of coral fragments, sponge spicules and algal matter. Living Animal: The short, stubby tentacles may be either plain brownish-fawn or may have an additional blackish- brown transverse band on the tentacles in either form. Both forms have been reported from widely-scattered Indo-Pacific localities. HErTLEIN (1960) reports both colour forms from the Galapagos and Clipperton Islands. Evidence on hand strongly suggests that the two forms are conspecific. The occurrence of 2 colour forms in a species is by no means confined to Drupa ricinus, but can be observed in Strombus gibberulus gibbosus (Rop- ING, 1798), Duplicaria duplicata (LinNAEus, 1758), and Conus marmoreus LinNAgEus, 1758, and _ several other gastropods. This once again confirms the futility of using shell-colour as a guide for specific diagnosis of molluscs. Drupa rubusidaeus Ropine, 1798 (Plate 47, Figures 10, 10 a) 1798. Drupa rubusidaeus Rovinc, Mus. Bolten., p. 55, No. 698 1807. Mancinella hystrix Linx, Beschr. Nat. Samml. Univ. Rostock, p. 115 1822. Ricinula miticula Lamarck, Anim. s. vert., 7: 231 1828. Murex hippocastanum Wooo, Ind, Test., pl. 26, fig. 53 (non Murex hippocastanum Linnaeus, 1758) 1832. Purpura spathulifera BLAINvILLE, Nouv. Ann. Mus. Hist. Nat., 1: 212; pl. 9, fig. 8 1862. Ricinula reeveana CrossE, Journ. Conchyl. 10: 47; pl. 1, fig. 3 Shell: Yellowish in colour, generally heavily encrusted with coral growth. Sculptured with 4-6 spiral rows of THE VELIGER Page 301 bluntly spinose nodes, earlier whorls with a single row. Edge of aperture yellow or orange, labial lip rose-violet and ornamented with 7-9 denticles which may extend into the aperture and become whitish within. Columella rose-violet in colour, irregularly flecked with yellow or orange, and sculptured with plicae anteriorly; the edge of the columellar callus occasionally has 6 - 7 small den- ticles. Operculum moderately thin, orange-brown in col- our and with lateral nucleus. L: 25-58mm; W: 78 -94%; HA 76 - 87% Type Locality: None. Habitat: On reefs, under coral rocks, in shallow water. Moderately common. Distribution: Throughout the Fiji Islands. — Indo-Pacific. Discussion: The species Drupa rubusidaeus has a con- fused nomenclature, and R6p1no’s specific name has oc- casionally been applied to the species Drupa clathrata (Lamarck). The confusion probably started with Hep- LEY (1913) who placed Ricinula clathrata Lamarck, R. speciosa DUNKER, 1867 and Purpura spathulifera BLAIN- VILLE in the synonymy of Drupa rubusidaeus Ropinc; several Japanese workers subsequently adopted HEDLEY’s synonymy. The identification of D. rubusidaeus depends on the interpretation of Ropinc’s (1798) cited figures from Martini (1777, 3: 283, pl. 101, figs. 974, 975). It has to be admitted that the cited figures are somewhat ambiguous, and could represent in part either D. clath- rata (LaMarcK) or D. rubusidaeus ROpiNnc. The general form, numerous spines, and shape of the juncture of the aperture would favour D. clathrata, but the colouring and general aspect of the apertural features strongly favour D. rubusidaeus. MARTINI (op. cit.) called his spe- cies “Der Igel,” and referred to Guattierr (1742), pl. 28, fig. N as a reference; it is unfortunate that these figures represent the species D. ricinus (LinNAEUS). No denticles are visible in the Martini figures of D. rubusi- daeus, but they are mentioned by Martini in the descrip- tion. Although ambiguous, the figures tend to represent the same species as the Purpura spathulifera BLAINVILLE, and R6p1Ne’s earlier name has been accepted in this paper. DunKeErR (1867) described a Ricinula speciosa (non Purpura speciosa VALENCIENNES, 1832), but in 1870 (p. 139) he stated that his R. speciosa is a smaller and mature example of R. reeveana Crosse. The United States Na- tional Museum collection has numerous specimens of Drupa speciosa from Polynesia, and it is evident that this is a valid species confined to Polynesia, and inter- mediate in characters between D. clathrata and D. rubu- sidaeus. EMERSON in WEAVER (1966) reported the species from the Fiji Islands, but it does not occur there. Oos- Page 302 THE VELIGE Vol. 11; No. 4 eo MAMANUCA wm) Waya ae | Ag Wed Nacula (tu 2 8 ‘3 Yaduo ey oe _VANUA LEVU af 6 Oo Q@ Noaviti OWaya Loilai Korotogo’ Sovi Bay Korolevu CQvarucece ape K QUEENSLAND AUSTRALIA mauRU °! . QABERT le PHOENIX Ie 4 4 quUIcE ls. | ENS : TOKELAU Is - Si hy © gana caur ls aS Samos ? eanns lo °s we HeORiDgS e Vv @. Ful Is OO OF ° : Tones Now 3 © LOYALTY Io 5 CALEDONIA a PZ OA Ge Eh IG: + WORFOLK |. LEV U Nansnura! RA ih ZEtlingto n Whorft ae: és 2 KADAVU oY « A fed RAY 0246810 SUVA :Nukula sNasilai u _?Dravuni -°Bulia >Ono Scale of Miles 20 30 —$$$$__i——____| Longitude East 179° Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Page 303 TINGH (1931) reports D. hystrix var. speciosa DUNKER from Sumatra, but this record needs clarification. The types of Ricinula miticula Lamarck are in the Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle in Geneva; the holotype measures 26.3 mm, the paratype 26.0 mm; they are the species Drupa rubusidaeus Ropinc. The holotype of Rz- cinula reeveana Cross: is in the British Museum (Natural History) in London; it measures 48.2 38.8 mm; this spe- cies which was described from Nouhiva (=Nukuhiva), Marquesas, is not conspecific with D. speciosa (DUNKER), but is a large, immature example of D. rubusidaeus ROp- ING with a bright maroon coloured aperture. Drupina Dat, 1923 Drupina Dax, 1923, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila., 75: 303. Type species by OD Ricinula digitata Lamarck, 1816 = Drupa grossularia Rovinc, 1798 Discussion: The shell of Drupina is similar to that of Drupa Rooprne, but the sculpture is more scabrous and minutely foliated, labial teeth are smaller and grouped, although they may be paired, and the columella is heav- ily calloused. The labial digitations are extended. The radular pattern of Drupina differs appreciably from any known radula of other thaidine genera, and fully supports DaLL’s generic separation on morphologi- cal features of the shell. The genus is at the present time monotypic and contains an Indo-Pacific species. Drupina grossularia (Ropinc, 1798) (Plate 48, Figure 11; Text figure 7) 1798. Drupa grossularia Rovinc, Mus. Bolten., p. 55, No. 700 1816. Ricinula digitata Lamarck, Tabl. Encycl. Méth., p. 2; pl. 395, figs. 7a, 7b 1817. Ricinella dactyloides ScHUMACHER, Ess. nouv. syst., p. 241 1828. Murex ricinus Woop, Ind. Test., pl. 26, fig. 51 (non Linnaeus, 1758) 1832. Purpura lobata BLAINvILLE, Nouv. Ann. Mus. Hist. Nat., 1: 210; pl. 9, fig. 7 (Indian Ocean subspecies) 1850. Purpura laurentiana PETIT DE LA SAUSSAYE, Journ. Con- chyl., 1: 403; pl. 13, fig. 2 (specim. juv.) 1965. Drupina glossularia (Ropinc), Wu, Bull. Inst. Zool. Acad. Sin., 4: 99 (invalid emendation) 1967. Drupina glossularia (LinNE), Hase & Kosuce, Std. Book Japan. shells col., p. 70; pl. 27, fig. 22 Shell: Uniformly creamy-white to yellow in colour. Sculp- tured with about 5 heavy spiral cords and intermediate scabrous lirae on the body whorl, and a single row of obsolete and indistinct nodules. Aperture narrow, orange in colour, edge of labial lip with 5 digitations which are actual extensions of the spiral cords; the labial lip has prominent white nodules and the columella is heavily calloused and plicate; the edge of the labial callus is sometimes finely denticulate. Operculum brown in colour, with a lateral nucleus. Radula: Odontophore 6.5 mm long and 0.14 mm wide in an animal with a shell 30.3 mm in length; rows of teeth 100. : CLA Figure 7 Drupina grossularia (ROop1NGc) Fiji Islands half row of radular teeth number 271 (plus 17 nascentes). The rhachidian is equipped with about 13 moderately short cusps of al- most uniform size, the side-cusps are trifid; laterals small and simple. L: 22-36mm; W: 96- 113%; HA: 85-91% Type Locality: None. Habitat: On reefs, near reef’s edge, in crevices and under coral rocks, in shallow water. Moderately common. Distribution: Throughout the Fiji Islands. — Pacific. Discussion: Drupina lobata (BLAINVILLE, 1832) is a subspecies or colour form of D. grossularia with a dark brown-maroon aperture, and appears to be restricted to the Indian Ocean. Drupella Turere, 1925 Drupella THIELE, 1925, Wissensch. Erg. Exp. Valdivia, 17: 171. Type species by SD (TurEte, 1929) Drupa (Drupella) ochrostoma (BLAINVILLE, 1832) = Purpura ochrosto- ma BLAINVILLE, 1832 Discussion: In shell features, species of Drupella re- semble Morula ScHuMACHER, 1817 and Cronia H.& A. ApamMs, 1853, or even some species of Maculotriton Dati, 1904. They are a small compact group whose radu- la bears no similarity to any other muricid genus, with the possible exception of Vexilla Swarnson, 1840. Spe- cies of Vexilla also have a plain or serrated rhachidian; the laterals, although not as long as those of Drupella, are more elongate than the typical muricid lateral, and are also either simple or denticulate (see Cooke, 1919, and TureLe, 1929). The penis also differs in structure Page 304 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 from that of Drupa s. str.; it is stout, stubby and tubular, and has a large oval seminal duct exit. Species of Drupella are widely distributed in the Indo- West Pacific. They inhabit a variety of habitats and are not confined to branching coral (fide Cooke, 1895 and Demonp, 1957) ; they may be found in branching coral, in crevices of algae-matted reef platforms and on the underside of coral blocks which litter Fiji reefs, and occur on coastal reefs as well as outlying islets. Drupella cornus (Ropine, 1798) (Plate 48, Figures 12, 12a, 12b; Text figure 8) 1798. Drupa cornus Ropinc, Mus. Bolten., p. 56, No. 704 (female form) 1832. Purpura nassoidea BLAINvILLE, Nouv. Ann. Mus. Hist. Nat., 1: 205 (male form) 1832. Purpura elata BLAINvILLE, Nouv. Ann. Mus. Hist. Nat. 1: 207; pl. 11, fig. 1 (female form) 1833. Purpura nassoides Quoy & GatmarD, Voy. Astrolabe, Zool., 2: 564; pl. 38, figs. 7, 8, 9 (male form) 1839. Purpura (Ricinula) martiniana ANTON, Verz. Conch., p. 88 1846. Ricinula spectrum REEvE, Conch. Icon., 3, pl. 3, sp. 19 (female form) 1846. Ricinula dealbata ReEEvE, Conch. Icon., 3, pl. 4, sp. 26 1852. Ricinula eburnea Kuster, Conch. Cab., 2™4 ed., 3: 17; pl. 3, fig. 9 1853. Purpura alba HomBRON & Jagutnot, Voy. Pole Sud Ast. « Zélée, Atlas, pl. 22, figs. 30, 31 (specim. juv.) 1918. Drupa vitiensis Prrspry & Bryan, Nautilus 31, pl. 9, fig. 5 (dark noduled male form) 1921. Sistrum vitiense Prtspry, Proc. Acad, Nat. Sci. Phila., 72: 319 1967. Drupella mancilla [sic] LinNE, Habe « Kosuce, Std. Book Japan. shell, p. 70; pl. 27, fig. 20 (female form) 1967. Drupa (Drupella) chaidea (Ductos), Orr-Maes, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila., 119: 129; pl. 11, fig. 6 (male form) Shell (Female): White in colour throughout. Sculptured with 4 spiral rows of prominent and pointed nodes, earlier whorls with a single row; interstices of nodules with 3 - 5 spiral grooves. Aperture narrow, porcellaneous white, labial lip with from 5-8 moderately sized denticles, lower half of columella with 2 -5 irregular short plicae. Anal notch indistinct, base with a heavy callus. Shell (Male): Generally smaller than that of females, but rare specimens may attain the same size. The shell is more bulbous in appearance and the sculpture is ap- preciably more discrete. ‘The spiral nodules are more nu- merous, smaller and blunter, and the shell is spirally corded, not grooved; the aperture appears wider and labial denticles smaller. Radula: Odontophore brown in colour, 8.0 mm long and 0.28 mm wide in an animal with a shell 38.0mm in length; rows of teeth number 264 (plus 33 nascentes). Rhachidian with a massive central cusp, moderately smaller outer cusps, thin and sharp intermediate den- ticles and 8 - 13 serrated denticles at either side of the central cusp; laterals are long and thin, ca. 6 times as broad as the rhachidian, sharply and minutely denticu- late at the base, distal end curved and pointed, and either simple or bifid. Eighteen specimens from various Fijian localities were examined and no sexual dimorphism of the radula was evident. Both males and females had the same type of rhachidian; the curved distal end of the laterals was simple in most specimens, bifid in others, and 1 male specimen 22.3 mm in length showed both simple and bi- fid tips on laterals in the same ribbon. The inner part of the base of the lateral teeth is obviously also used in abrading food particles; in the first one dozen or more rows of teeth, the inner denticles were completely worn off and came back to normal size as the rows progressed towards the end with the nascentes. L: 18-50mm; W: 51-61%; HA: 48-57% Type Locality: None. Habitat: On reefs in crevices and under coral rocks, in shallow water. Common. Distribution: Throughout the Fiji Islands. — Indo-Pacific. Discussion: ARAKAWA (1958) figured the radulae of Drupella cornus (RopiNG) and D. fragum (BLAINVILLE), and reported on the sexual dimorphism of the radula in the two species. His text figures 1 and 2 of D. fragum are both immature specimens of D. cornus; the rhachidians and laterals of the radula of D. cornus depicted by Ara- Explanation of Plate 49 Figure 19: Morula granulata (Ductos) X 2.0 Figure 20: Morula nodicostata (PEASE) xX 3.0 Figure 21: Morula parva (REEVE) 352 Figures 22, 22a: Morula spinosa (H. « A. ADAMS) Figures 23, 23a: Morula uva (Rop1nc) xX 1.5 ln? Figure 28: Vexilla vexillum (GMELIN) Figure 29: Nassa serta (BRUGUIERE) Figure 24: Morula (Cronia) aurantiaca (HOMBRON & JAQUINOT) x 15 Figure 25: Morula (Cronia) fiscella (GMELIN) X 1.2 Figure 26: Morula (Cronia) margariticola (BRoDERIP) xX 15 Figure 27: Maculotriton egregius (REEVE) X15 xX 1.3 xX 1.0 THE VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 4 [CeRNoHOoRSky] Plate 49 Figure 21 Figure 22 Figure 22 a Figure 23 Figure 23 a Figure 25 Figure 26 Figure 27 Figure 28 Figure 29 photographs by W. O. CernoHorsky Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Page 305 KAWA on plate 6, figures 5 and 12 fully agree with the radula of D. cornus from the Fiji Islands. In the 8 males and 10 females of D. cornus from Fiji waters examined, no difference in the pattern of rhachidians between the sexes was observed; a sexual dimorphism in the shell, however, was evident. In the juvenile stage (thin labial lip devoid of denticles) the shells of both sexes are the same, i. e., they are barrel-shaped with blunt small nod- ules and distinct spiral cords. In fully mature specimens, however, all the females examined had a heavy and large shell with prominent and spinose nodes, while all adult males retained the barrel-shaped form with blunt nodules and prominent spiral lirae. Both forms occurred in small colonies under the same rock and were observed in mating position. The reed-like laterals of Drupella cornus are always serrated for a short distance at the base, whereas they are smooth in D. rugosa (Born, 1778) and D. ochrostoma (BLAINVILLE, 1832). No side-denticles on the rhachidians 100p. , 200u Figure 8 Drupella cornus (Rop1nc) Fiji Islands a. half row of radular teeth b. basal portion of lateral teeth - enlarged c. distal end of lateral teeth - enlarged d. penis of D. rugosa (=D. fragum of ARAKAWA) were observed in any of the specimens examined. The distal end of the laterals may, as pointed out by ARAKAWA (op. cit.) be either bifid or simple. In view of the discrepancies be- tween ARAKAWA’s and my own findings, it is suspected that the differences in radula pattern are either regional or a third similar species may be involved. The male form of Drupella cornus has been occasion- ally listed as Purpura chaidea Ductos, 1832. Ductos’ species, however, is a nassarid-shaped species with prom- inent and thick axial folds which are decussated by close- set spiral striae. The species Ricinula siderea REEVE, 1846, is generally placed in the synonymy of Drupella cornus (R6pINGc). REEvE’s 3 syntypes are in the British Museum (Natural History), London, and from examination of the types it is evident that Rerve’s Ricinula siderea is a columbellid species and not a muricid; the holotype measures 12.8 by 6.4 mm. Drupella ochrostoma (BLAINVILLE, 1832) (Plate 48, Figures 14, 14a; Text figure 9) 1832. Purpura ochrostoma BiainviLte, Nouv. Ann. Mus. Hist. Nat., 1: 205 1833. Purpura nassoides yar. Quoy & GarmarD, Voy. Astro- labe, Zool., 2: 564; pl. 38, figs. 10, 11 (non BLaINvILLE, 1832) Shell: Whitish to creamy-yellow in colour, nodules oc- casionally brown. Sculptured with 4 spiral rows of small, blunt and often brownish nodules (ca. 9-12 per row) which decrease in size towards the base; the penultimate whorl with a single or rarely double row of nodules. Interstices sculptured with 2 regular and scabrous spiral cords. Aperture orange, labial lip with 5-6 prominent white denticles; siphonal canal short and calloused. Radula: Odontophore 7.0 mm long and 0.15 mm wide in 100pn = 00 200K | Figure 9 Drupella ochrostoma (BLAINVILLE) Fiji Islands half row of radular teeth Page 306 an animal with a shell 22.5 mm in length; rows of teeth number 205 (plus 26 nascentes) and early rows are worn. Rhachidians with a massive central cusp, thick outer cusps and small intermediate denticles; laterals long, slender and simple, curved at the distal end, and approx- imately 9 times as broad as the rhachidians. L: 17-25mm; W: 58-60%; HA: 56 - 63% Type Locality: Tonga. Habitat: On reefs, in crevices and under coral rocks, in shallow water. Uncommon. Distribution: Throughout the Fiji Islands. — Indo-Pacific. Discussion: BLAINvILLE’s (1832) reference to figure 8 is possibly an error for figure 10, which depicts a specimen with an orange aperture. Figures 7 - 9 are Purpura nasso- idea BLAINVILLE, 1832. Drupella rugosa (Born, 1778) (Plate 48, Figures 15, 15a; Text figure 10) 1778. Murex rugosus Born, Ind. rer. nat. Caes. Vindob., p. 303 1822. Murex concatenatus Lamarck, Anim. s. vert., 7: 176 1832. Purpura fragum BuainvitLtE, Nouv. Ann. Mus. Hist. Nat., 1: 203; pl. 9, fig. 4 Shell: White in colour, rarely creamy-yellow, nodules oc- casionally dark brown. Sculptured with 3 - 4 spiral rows of prominent nodules, penultimate whorl with a single row; nodules are connected by scabrous spiral cords, and interstices are ornamented with 3-5 spiral ridges, base of shell with 2-3 heavy cords; some specimens show a distinct varix on the body whorl. Aperture white, labial lip with 6-10 denticles which are uniformly spaced, lower half of columella with 3 - 4 short plicae; siphonal canal short, stained with orange anteriorly. Young specimens are scabrous, dark orange in colour with the nodules dark brown; penultimate whorl carries 2 rows of nodules which in the adult stage fuse into a single row; interstitial spiral cords very weak. Radula: Odontophore brown in colour, 8.7mm _ long and 0.23 mm wide in an animal with a shell 23.0 mm in length; rows of teeth number 166 (plus 21 nascentes). Rhachidians with a massive central cusp, prominent outer cusps and with or without an intermediate denticle. Lat- erals long and about 8 times as broad as the rhachidians, simple and curved at the distal end. L: 20-35mm; W: 52-56%; HA: 55 - 60% Type Locality: None. Habitat: On reefs, under coral rocks, in shallow water, Uncommon. Distribution: Throughout the Fiji Islands. — Indo-Pacific. Discussion: Born (1778) cited a figure from CHEMNITZ (1780, pl. 124, figs. 1155, 1156) for his species, which is a rather indifferently executed figure for the species un- THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 100p 200u Figure 10 Drupella rugosa (Born) Fiji Islands half row of radular teeth der discussion; LAMARCK’s Murex concatenatus was based on the same Cuemnirz figure. In addition, Lamarck (1822) cited Lister (1685-92, pl. 954, fig. 5) which is Morula uva (Ropinc, 1798), while the reference to Knorr (1769, pl. 26, fig. 2) could just about represent any similar species. BLAINvVILLE (1832) described his Purpura fragum as yellowish-white on the outside, with dark rose nodules and a completely white aperture. Fiji specimens agree with BLAINVILLE’s diagnosis of a white aperture, but specimens with a yellowish-orange aperture do occur in other Pacific localities. The shells of Drupella cornus and D. rugosa may ap- pear similar when both are adult and heavily encrusted with coral growth; juvenile shells of both species, how- ever, differ quite prominently. The species Drupella rugosa from Fiji has a different radula pattern than has been figured by ARAKAWA (1958, as D. fragum), and no sexual dimorphism of the radula has been observed in this species. Drupella c.f. D. angulata (REEVE, 1844) (Plate 48, Figures 16, 16a, 16b; Text figure 11) 1844. Triton angulatus REEVE, Conch. Icon., 2, pl. 9, sp. 88 Shell: Small and moderately slender, variable in colour, but generally white or yellow, occasionally ornamented with spiral rows of black spots or orange-brown trans- verse zones. Whorls number from 5 - 6, and protoconch is not distinguishable in adult specimens. Body whorl sculptured with 1-3 rows of prominent or feeble and blunt nodules, while the penultimate whorl has either a single row of nodules or from 10 - 13 angulate and nod- ulose axial ribs; body whorl has an additional 12 - 20 moderately coarse spiral cords which may override the nodules. Aperture white, labial lip ornamented with 5 - 6 Vol. 11; No. 4 50 200K Figure 11 Drupella cf. D. angulata (REEVE) Fiji Islands a. half row of radular teeth b. distal end of lateral teeth small denticles, columella smooth; anterior canal short and open, anal canal prominent and almost resembling a daphnelloid notch. Radula: Odontophore 4.6 mm long and 0.12 mm wide in an animal with a shell 12.5 mm in length; rows of teeth number 120 (plus 8 nascentes) and early rows are worn. Rhachidians with a long and slender central cusp, inter- mediate denticles small but slender, side cusps broad; laterals long and slender, 10 times as broad as the rhachi- dians, the distal end terminates in a simple curved cusp which has at the base a smaller accessory cusp. L: 9- 20mm; W: 49-58%; HA: 52 - 60% Distribution: Throughout the Fiji Islands. — ? Habitat: On reefs, under coral rocks, in shallow water. Moderately common. Discussion: This species, although moderately common in Fiji, is not represented in the rather comprehensive mol- luscan collections of the U.S. National Museum. The species has been tentatively associated with REEvE’s Triton angulatus as his description and figure appear fairly compatible with the Fiji species. Morula ScHuMacHeER, 1817 Morula Scuumacu_Er, 1817, Ess. nouv. syst., pp. 68, 227. Type species by M Morula papillosa ScHUMACHER, 1817 = Drupa uva Roving, 1798 Discussion: ARAKAWA (1965) established the new genus Tenguella with Purpura granulata Ductos, 1832 as the type species; he erected his new genus on the basis of differences in the number of side-denticles of the rhachid- ians of the radula in Morula uva (ROpINc) and M. granulata (Ductos). Wu (1965a) commented on the variability of the number of side-denticles in the two THE VELIGER Page 307 species under discussion and doubted the validity of Tenguella. The number of side-denticles was found to vary in both species from 1-3 and the length of these denticles also was found to be variable; one can see no merit in retaining this monotypic genus in muricid no- menclature. The type species of Morulina Dati, 1923 is Ricinula mutica LAMARCK, 1822 by original designation, and not Morulina ceylonica Dax, 1923 as pointed out by ArRa- KAWA (1965); the latter species is an immature speci- men of Morula granulata (Ductos, 1832). The side-cusps of the rhachidians in Morula are always simple and not bifid to quadrifid as in Drupa. Morula anaxeres (KIENER, 1835) (Plate 48, Figures 17, 17a; Text figure 12) 1835. Purpura cancellata KiENER, Spec. gén. icon. coq. viv., p- 25; pl. 7, figs. 16, 16a (non Quoy « Garmarp, 1833) 1835. Purpura anaxeres KIENER, Spec. gén. icon. coq. viv., p. 26; pl. 7, figs. 17, 17a Shell: Variable in colour, dirty grey or brown, nodules occasionally white; interstices sometimes banded with brown. Sculptured with spiral rows of nodules and striae. Labial lip either dark purplish-brown or with occasional white flecks; labial denticles number from 4-5. Columella either fully dark purplish-brown or brown, occasionally streaked with white or light violet, sculptured with 2-4 small and irregular plicae. Figure 12 50p SEE. Morula anaxeres (KIENER) Fiji Islands half row of radular teeth Radula: Odontophore 3.4 mm long and 0.14 mm wide in an animal with a shell 25.0 mm in length; rows of teeth number 94 (plus 4 nascentes). Rhachidians with a large central cusp, smaller side-cusps, small intermediate den- ticles and 0 - 2 side denticles. L: 10-28mm; W: 61-79%; HA: 63-70% Type Locality: L’ile Tycopia, des Nouvelles Hebrides. Habitat: Under basalt rocks, near high tide level, rarely under coral rocks in the intertidal zone. Common. Distribution: Throughout the Fiji Islands. — Indo-Pacific. Page 308 Morula biconica (BLAINVILLE, 1832) (Plate 48, Figures 13, 18; Text figures 13, 14) 1832. Purpura biconica BuLatInviILLE, Nouv. Ann. Mus. Hist. Nat., 1: 203; pl. 9, fig. 1 1846. Ricinula bicatenata REEVE, Conch. Icon., pl. 6, sp. 48 1868. Engina variabilis Peasr, Amer. Journ. Malac., 3: 275; pl. 23, fig. 9 Shell: Small, whitish to dark grey in colour, pointed at both ends. Sculptured with blackish axial ribs which are generally spinose, and white, prominent and_ scabrous cae Figure 13 Morula biconica (BLAINVILLE) Fiji Islands half row of radular teeth \ 50H j TARE oi Figure 14 Morula biconica (BLAINVILLE) Fiji Islands a. half row of radular teeth b. part of rhachidian showing variation of cusps spiral cords. Edge of labial lip white and scabrous, aper- ture angulate and narrow, violet to dark purple in colour; columella irregularly plicate anteriorly. Radula: Odontophore 1.16 mm long and 0.06 mm wide in an animal with a shell 11.5 mm in length; rows of teeth number 69 (plus 3 nascentes). Rhachidians have a large central cusp, short or long intermediate denticles, simple side-cusps and 2 - 3 side denticles; laterals simple and curved. L: 8-17 mm; W: 57-65%; HA: 56 - 63% Type Locality: None. Habitat: On reefs, under coral rocks, in shallow water. Common. Distribution: Throughout the Fiji Islands. — Indo-Pacific. THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 Morula granulata (Ductos, 1832) (Plate 49, Figure 19; Text figures 15, 16) 1832. Purpura granulata Ductos, Ann. Sci, Nat., 26: 9; pl. 2, fig. 9 1832. Purpura tuberculata BLAINvILLE, Nouv. Ann. Mus. Hist. Nat., 1: 204; pl. 9, fig. 3 1835. Purpura tuberculata cingulifera KiENER, Spec. gén. icon coq. viv., pl. 5, fig. 10a 1908. Sistrum chrysalis Sowersy, Proc. Malac. Soc. London, 8: 17; pl. 1, fig. 5 1923. Morulina ceylonica Dau, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila., 75: 305 (specim. juv.) Shell: Dirty white in colour, ornamented with spiral rows of brown nodules. Sculptured with 5-6 spiral rows of squarish but rounded large brown nodules, earlier whorls with 1 - 2 rows; interstices finely spirally lirate. Aperture violet, edge of columella and labial lip dark purple- brown; labial lip with 4 - 5 denticles which are generally bluish-white, columella with 2-4 sinuous plicae. Oper- culum with a lateral nucleus. 100u Ss) Figure 15 Morula granulata (Ductos) Fiji Islands half row of radular teeth 100u, Figure 16 Morula granulata (Ductos) Fiji Islands Rhachidian of radula Radula: Odontophore 5.6 mm long and 0.14 mm wide in an animal with a shell 26.0 mm in length; rows of teeth number 203 (plus 12 nascentes), Rhachidians with a Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Page 309 large central cusp, smaller side-cusps and small inter- mediate denticles; the side denticles number from 1 -3, but one specimen examined almost lacked side denticles altogether, apart from a weak hump on one side. L: 15-30mm; W: 62-73%; HA: 50-69% Type Locality: Nouvelle-Hollande. Habitat: On reefs, under coral rocks, in shallow water. Common. Distribution: Throughout the Fiji Islands. — Indo-Pacific. Morula nodicostata (PEASE, 1868) (Plate 49, Figure 20; Text figure 17) 1868. Engina nodicostata Peasz, Amer. Journ. Conch., 3: 274; pl. 23, fig. 8 1909. Engina purpureo-cincta Preston, Rec. Ind. Mus., 3: 136 Shell: Small, light violet in colour, nodules white, inter- stices occasionally dark brown. Sculptured with 3 spiral rows of white round nodules; the nodules nearest the suture are rather large and are bisected by 3-4 spiral cords; earlier whorls with a single row of nodules. Inter- stices smooth and ornamented with dark brown blotches. Aperture violet in colour, interior of aperture with a broad, white median band; labial lip has 6 small denticles, columella 2-3 short plicae. 50p ; Figure 17 Morula nodicostata (PEASE) Fiji Islands half row of radular teeth Radula: Odontophore 1.28 mm long and 0.06 mm wide in an animal with a shell 9.8mm in length; rows of teeth number 110 (plus 6 nascentes). Rhachidians have a moderately long central cusp, short intermediate den- ticles, simple side cusps and 2 - 3 side denticles; laterals simple and curved. L: 7-11mm; W: 61-67%; HA: 60-64% Type Locality: Paumotus. Habitat: On reefs, under coral rocks, in shallow water. Uncommon. Distribution: Throughout the Fiji Islands. — Indo-Pacific. Discussion: Orr-Mars (1967) figured the radula of Morula nodicostata from Cocos-Keeling Islands (Indian Ocean) ; the particular specimen examined lacked side- denticles on the rhachidians of the radula. It is obvious that the presence or absence of such side-denticles in the Morula-Cronia group of species is a variable feature, and has been observed in other species of Morula. Morula parva (Reeve, 1846) (Plate 49, Figure 21) 1846. Ricinula parva Reeve, Conch. Icon., pl. 6, sp. 43 1846. Ricinula echinata Reeve, Conch. Icon., pl. 6, sp. 54 1860. Engina nodulifera PEAsE, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, p. 142 1893. Sistrum angulatum Sowersy, Proc. Malac. Soc. Lon- don, 1: 46; pl. 4, fig. 3 Shell: Small, white in colour, ornamented with white and orange nodules and spines. Sculptured with a row of orange nodules at the sutures and prominent white or orange spinose spiral cords; the penultimate whorl has one row of orange nodules at the sutures and 2 spinose spiral cords; interstices finely axially striate. Aperture narrow and elongate, white in colour, interior of aper- ture with a dark purplish-brown band; labial lip has 4 - 5 prominent white nodules and the columella 2 - 3 plicae. L: 6-10 mm; W: 56-62%; HA: 56-60% Type Locality: Island of Luzon, Philippines. Habitat: On reefs, under coral rocks, in shallow water. Distribution: Throughout the Fiji Islands. — Indo-Pacific. Morula spinosa (H. & A. Apams, 1853) (Plate 49, Figures 22, 22a) 1846. Ricinula chrysostoma DesHAYES, REEVE, Conch. Icon., pl. 2, fig. 12b only (non Desuayes, 1844) 1853. Pentadactylus (Sistrum) spinosus H. « A. Apams, Gen. rec. Moll., 1: 130 (nom. nov. pro Ricinula chrysosto- ma REEVE, 1846) 1853. Murex iostomus A. Apams, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, p. 267 1862. Ricinula chrysostoma DEsHayEs, Kuster, Conch. Cab., 274 ed., p. 24; pl. 4, fig. 7 (non Desuayes, 1844) 1909. Sistrum andrewsi E. A. Smiru, Proc. Malac. Soc. Lon- don, 8: 369; 2 figs. 1923. Morula ambusta Datu, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila., 75: 304 (nom. nov. pro Ricinula chrysostoma REEVE, 1846) Shell; Variable in colour, uniformly whitish, yellow or grey, occasionally ornamented with brown spiral cords and spinose nodes. Sculptured with about 9 spinose vari- ces on the body whorl which are arranged in 3 - 4 spiral rows; penultimate whorl with a single row of spinose nodes. Interstices sculptured with 4-10 brown spiral cords. Aperture elongate and narrow, yellow to orange or Page 310 violet in colour, labial lip with about 5 small denticles; columella with 0-5 obsolete short plicae anteriorly. L: 18-38mm; W: 63-72%; HA: 57-67% Type Locality: Islands of Bohol and Ticao, Philippines. Habitat: On reefs, under coral rocks, in shallow water. Uncommon. Distribution: Throughout the Fiji Islands. — Indo-Pacific. Discussion: The holotype of Murex iostomus A. ADAMS from the Philippine Islands, ex coll. Cuming, no. 196572 — 23.0 < 17.8 mm, is in the British Museum (Natural History) ; it is an immature specimen with dark brown fronds. The types of Sistrum andrewsi E. A. SmitH from Christmas Island (Indian Ocean) are in the British Mu- seum collection; the holotype no. 1909.5.8.62 — 25.4 mm in length is a fully mature specimen of the species under discussion. Hase & Kosuce (1966, pl. 20, fig. 12) figure this spe- cies as Thaisiella rugosa (Born). Morula uva (Ropinc, 1798) (Plate 49, Figures 23, 23a; Text figure 18) 1798. Drupa uva Rovinc, Mus. Bolten., p. 56, No. 703 1816. Ricinula aspera Lamarcx, Tabl. Encycl. Méth., pl. 395, figs. 4a, 4b 1816. Ricinula nodus Lamarcx, Tabl. Encycl. Méth., p.2; pl. 395, figs. 6a, 6b 1817. Morula papillosa ScHuMacuER, Ess. nouv. syst., p. 227 1822. Ricinula morus LAMaARCcK, Anim. s. vert., 7: 232 1832. Purpura sphaeridea Ducios, Ann. Sci. Nat., 26: 9; pl. 2, fig. 10 1852. Ricinula alba Morcn, Cat. Conch. Yoldi, p. 87 1868. Sistrum striatum Pease, Amer. Journ. Conch., 3: 276; pl. 23, fig. 12 1966. Morula nodilifera [sic] HaBE « Kosuce, Shells world col., 2: 14; pl. 20, fig. 14 (specim. juv.) (non Purpura nodulifera MENKE, 1829) Shell: White in colour, spiral rows of nodules or short spines blackish-brown. Sculptured with 5 spiral rows of small, blackish-brown nodules, early whorls with 2 such rows; interstices of nodules with 1-4 scabrous spiral cords. In some forms the nodules are spinose, may co- alesce and form ill-defined blackish-brown axial folds. Aperture narrow, violet in colour, labial lip with about 4 denticles, basal denticles usually smaller, columella with 2 - 4 short plicae. Radula: Odontophore 2.1 mm long and 0.09 mm wide in an animal with a shell 20.6 mm in length; rows of teeth number 162 (plus 8 nascentes). Rhachidian with a large central cusp, smaller side-cusps and small intermediate denticles; side denticles number from 1 - 3. L: 13-30mm; W: 58-70%; HA: 57-63% Type Locality: None. THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 50H. Figure 18 Morula uva (Ropinc) Fiji Islands one row of radular teeth - lateral shown in different position Habitat: On reefs, under coral rocks, in shallow water. Moderately common. Distribution: Throughout the Fiji Islands. — Indo-Pacific. Discussion: Drupa uva, Morula papillosa and Ricinula alba are all based on the same figure from Martini (1777, pl. 101, fig. 970). Ropinc (1798) cited an additional reference to Lister (1685-92, pl. 954, fig. 5), which clearly represents the species Drupa uva, and has been erroneously cited by Lamarck (1822) for his Murex concatenatus. Purpura nodulifera MENKE, 1829, which is the type species of Oppomorus IrREDALE, 1937, is absolutely un- identifiable. MENKE (1829) described his species as white, conically-ovate, axially nodulosely costate, nodes transversely striate; he did not cite a figure and his de- scription is applicable to several species of Morula. The types of Ricinula aspera LAMARCK are in the Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle in Geneva. The holotype no. 1107/17/1 — 20.5 mm, is the species Morula uva, as is the 15.5 mm paratype. There is a third specimen in the type-collection measuring 21.5 < 14.3 mm, which is the species Drupa marginatra (BLAINVILLE). This speci- men must have been added after the description, since according to Rosalie de Lamarck’s annotation in her father’s copy of the “Animaux sans vertébres,” Lamarck possessed only 2 specimens. These two specimens are the form with the spinose nodes. Lamarck’s holotype of Ricinula nodus is preserved in the same Museum under no. 1101/18/2 — 24.7 * 16.4 mm, and also is the spe- cies Morula uva. (Cronia) H. & A. Apams, 1853 Cronia H.« A. Apams, 1853, Gen. rec. Moll., 1: 128. Type species by M Purpura amygdala KiENER, 1835 Discussion: In this subgenus are placed species of Morula with prominent spiral and sometimes axial sculpture. The Vol. 11; No. 4 radula of Cronia is said to differ from that of Morula in the absence of side denticles on the rhachidians of Cro- nia, While this is true as far as the 2 species of Cronia from Fiji are concerned, rhachidians devoid of side den- ticles do occasionally crop up in the Morula group (see M. granulata Ductos and M. nodicostata Pease — fide Maes-Orr, 1967). Morula(Cronia) aurantiaca (Homsron & Jaguinot, 1853) (Plate 49, Figure 24) 1853. Purpura aurantiaca HomBron & JaQuiNnor, Voy. Pole. Sud Ast. & Zélée, pl. 22, figs. 28, 29 1854. Purpura aurantiaca HoMBRON & JAQuINoT, Voy. Pole Sud. Ast. « Zélée, text, p. 91 Shell: Only one juvenile specimen has so far been re- corded from the Fiji Islands. The adult shell has strong and broad axial ribs, close-set spiral striae which are oc- casionally purplish-brown, about 6 labial denticles and a few weak columellar plicae and some denticles. L: ca. 25 mm Type Locality: L’ile Hogoleu. Habitat: The single specimen was found under a coral rock near the reef’s edge, in 2 feet of water. Distribution: West Viti Levu. — Pacific. Discussion: A comparison of specimens of Morula amyg- dala (KiENER) and M. aurantiaca (HoMBRON & JAQUI- NOT) in the United States National Museum would in- dicate two extremely similar species. Morula aurantiaca from Pacific localities seems to be more brightly coloured with a predominance of orange than are specimens of M. amygdala from Australian localities. Morula (Cronia) fiscella (GMELIN, 1791) (Plate 49, Figure 25; Text figure 19) 1791. Murex fiscellum Gmeuin, Syst. Nat., ed. 13, p. 3552, No. 160 1845. Murex fiscellum “Cuemnitz,’ Reeve, Conch. Icon., pl. 27, fig. 124 1853. Purpura stellaris HoMBRON & JAQUINOT, Voy. Pole Sud Ast. & Zélée, Atlas, pl. 22, figs. 13, 14 1863. Coralliophila confragosa H.x A.Avams, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, p. 432 1868. Ststrum triangulatum PEasE, Amer. Journ. Conch., 3: 278; pl. 23, fig. 15 1869. Murex fiscellum Ktster, Conch. Cab., ed. 2, p. 95; pl. 33, figs. 10, 11 Shell: White or dirty grey, base of depressions in latticed sculpture brown in fresh specimens. Sculptured with 7 - 8 broad and scabrous axial ribs, which consist of a number THE VELIGER Page 311 of axially arranged fluted foliations; axial ribs overridden by 3-4 spiral cords, which are either double or triple stranded; towards the base are generally 2 rows of oblique foliated but blunt spines. The axial and spiral sculpture gives rise to recessed “windows” which are brown in colour. Aperture light or dark violet, edge of labial lip slightly fluted and sculptured with 6-7 small regular denticles, columella with 2-4 small denticles anteriorly. Operculum with lateral nucleus. Young specimens have an angulate labial lip near the juncture of the aperture; the apertural interior is whitish and ornamented with 1 - 2 broad dark brown bands. 100 ————————d Figure 19 Morula (Cronia) fiscella (GMELIN) Fiji Islands half row of radular teeth Radula: Odontophore 3.03 mm long and 0.19 mm wide in an animal with a shell 24.5 mm in length; rows of teeth number 129 (plus 7 nascentes). Rhachidians with a long central cusp, small intermediate denticles and simple side cusps; side denticles absent. Central cusp may be shorter in some specimens than in others; intermediate denticles are sometimes close-set to the side cusps. Laterals simple and curved. L: 18-35mm; W: 63-67%; HA: 68-73% Type Locality: Insulam Pulo Condore, prope Sinam. Habitat: On reefs, under coral rocks, in shallow water. Moderately common. Distribution: Throughout the Fiji Islands. — Indo-Pacific. Discussion: Morula fiscella (GMEtIN) and M. margariti- cola (BropErip, 1832) had a very confused nomencla- tural history and both names have been applied to both species interchangeably. GmMeELIn’s (1791) description is equivocal on its own merits, and the interpretation of the species depends on the cited figures from CHEMNITZ (1788, pl. 160, figs. 1524, 1525) and on CHEmnirz’s description. CHEMNITZ (op. cit.) clearly described his species as strongly clathrate with deeply recessed “win- dows” (depressions) which are coloured brown; his de- scription and figure are only applicable to M. fiscella and not to M. margariticola. The species has been cor- rectly figured by ReEve (1845). Page 312 Morula (Cronia) margariticola (BropERtP, 1832) (Pate 49, Figure 26; Text figure 20) 1832. Murex margariticola BropEriP, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lon- don, p. 177 1832. Purpura fiscella Lam., BiainviLLE, Nouv. Ann. Mus. Hist. Nat., 1: 206; pl. 10, fig. 8 (non Murex fiscellum Ge in, 1791) 1833. Purpura thiarella Quoy & Garmarp, Voy. Astrolabe, Zool., 2: 571; pl. 39, figs. 4, 5, 6 . 1923. Morula rhyssa Dax, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila., 75: 304 (nom. nov. pro Ricinula fiscellum REEVE, 1846) Shell: Dark brown to almost black in colour, interstices whitish. Sculptured with 9-12 broad axial ribs on the body whorl and 11 - 14 ribs on the penultimate whorl; axial ribs bisected by scabrous spiral cords which form nodules at the point of intersection. Spiral ridges number from 13-19 on the body whorl and from 5-9 on the penultimate whorl; usually 3 - 4 ridges are more promi- nent than the remainder. Aperture light violet or bluish- white, labial lip with 5-6 small denticles, columella with 1-3 elongated denticles anteriorly; parietal wall 100u —E—————— Figure 20 Morula (Cronia) margariticola (BRoDERIP) Fiji Islands a. half row of radular teeth b. ventro-lateral view of rhachidian occasionally with a brown blotch. Radula: Odontophore 6.0 mm long and 0.22 mm wide in an animal with a shell 26.0 mm in length; rows of teeth number 161 (plus 6 nascentes). Rhachidians with a long central cusp, small intermediate denticles and simple side cusps; side denticles absent. Laterals simple and curved. The chitinous teeth are set and hinged onto a darker THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 coloured base plate (dotted line in Text figure). Early rows of teeth are so worn that only the elongated base- plate remains. L: 18- 37mm; W: 55-63%; HA: 57 - 62% Type Locality: Oceano Pacifico, Lord Hood’s Island. Habitat: Under basalt boulders, near the high tide level and on reefs under coral rocks, in shallow water. Mod- erately common. Distribution: Throughout the Fiji Islands. — Indo-Pacific. Discussion: There are 3 syntypes of Murex margariticola in the British Museum (Natural History) in London. Broperip (1832) gave the measurements of the holotype as 13 x °/1” (= 34.9 X 16.8mm), but all 3 syntypes are smaller than the given size. The largest specimen measures 30.0 mm and is a fully mature specimen; this specimen is obviously the holotype. A smaller (25.3 mm) specimen is immature and has an “x” marked inside the aperture. Maculotriton Datu, 1904 Maculotriton Dati, 1904, Smiths. Misc. Coll., 47: 136. Type species by OD Triton bracteatus Hinps, 1844 Discussion: Species of this group are ranellid in appear- ance and may, or may not, have a varix on some of the whorls. The radula (fide THIELE, 1929) is similar to that of Cronia H. « A. ADAMs. Maculotriton egregius (REEVE, 1844) (Plate 49, Figure 27) 1844. Triton egregius REEVE, Conch. Icon., pl. 18, sp. 78 Shell: White to yellowish in colour, occasionally orna- mented with faint brown spots. Sculptured with 2 promi- nent varices on the body whorl and 3 coarse angulate axial ribs between the varices; penultimate whorl has 8-9 axial ribs and varices become indistinct on earlier whorls. Axial ribs are crossed by spiral cords, some of which are more prominent than others. Aperture creamy- white to light yellow in colour, labial lip with 7 - 8 elon- gated denticles, columella either smooth or with 1 - 2 very small denticles. L: 20-30 mm; W: 55-60%; HA: 58 - 62% Type Locality: Island of Masbate, Philippines. Habitat: On reefs, under coral rocks, in shallow water. Rare. Distribution: North Viti Levu. — Philippines. Discussion The spiral striae are not brown as described by REEvE, and the Fiji species is only tentatively associ- ated with REEveE’s Triton egregius. Triton eximius REEVE, Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Page 313 1844, is another similar species, but the axial ribs are much finer and more numerous. Vexilla Swainson, 1840 Vexilla Swanson, 1840, Treat. Malac., pp. 69, 300; fig. 67. Type species by M Vexilla picta Swainson, 1840 = Strombus vexillum GMELIN, 1791 Discussion: The radula of Vexilla (fide Cooke, 1919) is similar to the radula of Drupella THIELE, except that the laterals are less broad; it also resembles the radula of Nassa ROpiNnc in some aspects. Vexilla vexillum (GMELIN, 1791) (Plate 49, Figure 28) 1791. Strombus vexillum GMELIN, Syst. Nat., ed. 13, p. 3520, No. 52 1836. Purpura taeniata Powts, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, p. 96 1840. Vexilla picta Swainson, Treat. Malac., p. 300, fig. 67 Shell: This well-known species hardly requires a detailed description. The shell is dark brown in colour, ornamented with white transverse bands; the aperture is wide, creamy- yellow in colour and the labial lip is denticulate. L: 15- 22mm; W: 54-58%; HA: 78 - 84% Type Locality: Oceano Indico. Habitat: On reefs, under coral rocks, in shallow water. Uncommon. Distribution: South Viti Levu. - Indo-Pacific. Nassa Ropinc, 1798 Nassa Ropinec, 1798, Mus. Bolten., p. 132. Type species by SD (Dati, 1909) Nassa picta Ropinc, 1798 = Buc- cinum sertum BruGuiERE, 1789 Nassa serta (BRuGUIERE, 1789) (Plate 49, Figure 29; Text figure 21) 1789. Buccinum sertum BrucutkrRE, Encycl. Meéth., 1: 262 1798. Nassa picta Ropinc, Mus. Bolten., p. 132, No. 1655 1817. Stramonita hederacea SCHUMACHER, Ess. nouv. syst., p. 227 1967. Nassa serta (BRUGUIERE), CERNOHORSKY, Mar. shells Pacif., pl. 60, fig. 443 (spawn) Shell: Reddish-brown in colour, ornamented with broad and irregular white or light yellow zones and bands. Sculp- tured with from 25 - 35 obsolete axial ribs and 20 - 30 nodulose spiral cords; axial ribs generally more promi- nent on earlier whorls. Aperture wide, creamy-yellow in colour, edge of labial lip obsoletely denticulate; colu- mella creamy-white, smooth, apart from an anterior den- ticle. Operculum dark brown with a lateral nucleus. 100% 100u AA) AX) Figure 21 Nassa serta (BRUGUIERE) Fiji Islands a. half row of radular teeth b. rhachidian of radula Radula: Odontophore is 9.8 mm long and 0.26 mm wide in an animal with a shell 41.0mm in length; rows of teeth number 151 (plus 10 nascentes). Rhachidian with a long or moderately short central cusp, with or without intermediate denticles and short but massive side cusps; laterals simple and curved. L: 30-60mm; W: 49-56%; HA: 69 - 76% Type Locality: None. Habitat: On reefs, under coral rocks, in shallow water. Common. Distribution: Throughout the Fiji Islands. — Indo-Pacific. Discussion: The egg capsules of Nassa serta are typically muriciform and rather similar to those of Chicoreus car- neolus (Ropinc 1798). SUMMARY A total of 28 species of Thaidinae have been recorded from the Fiji Islands to date; all the species inhabit the littoral zone. The species recorded from Fiji are distrib- uted over the following genera: Thats 3 Mancinella 2 Drupa 5 Drupina 1 Drupella 4 Morula 7 (Cronia) 3 Maculotriton 1 Vexilla 1 Nassa 1 8 Total 28 species Page 314 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 LITERATURE CITED ARAKAWA, KOHMAN Y. 1958. | On the remarkable sexual dimorphism of the radula of Drupella. Venus, Japan. Journ. Malacol., 19 (3/4): 206 to 214; plt. 6; 2 text figs.; tables (February 1958) 1958a. Some notes on the radula of Purpura echinulata La- MARCK. Venus, Japan. Journ. Malacol., 20: 69-75 (July 1958) 1962. _A study on the radulae of the Japanese Muricidae. (1) The genera Purpura, Thais, and Mancinella. Venus, Jap- an. Journ. Malacol., 22 (1): 70- 78; plts. 5, 6 (Aug. 1962) 1964. A study on the radulae of the Japanese Muricidae (2). The genera Vexilla, Nassa, Rapana, Murex, Chicoreus, and Homalocantha. Venus, Japan. Journ. Malacol., 22 (4): 355 - 364; pit. 21 (March 1964) 1965. A study on the radulae of the Japanese Muricidae (3). The genera Drupa, Drupina, Drupella, Cronia, Morula, Moru- lina, Phrygiomurex, Cymia, and Tenguella gen. nov. Ve- nus, Japan. Journ. Malacol., 24 (2): 113-126; plts. 13, 14 (October 1965) BLAINVILLE, HENR1 Marie Ducrotay DE 1832. Disposition méthodique des espéces récentes et fossiles des genres Pourpre, Ricinule, Licorne et Concholépas de M. de Lamarck. Nouv. Ann. Mus. Hist. Nat., Paris. 1: 189 - 263; plts. 9- 12 Born, IcNATZ von 1778. Index rerum naturalium Musei Caesarei Vindobon- ensis; pars I, Testacea. Vienna, i- xlii; 1 - 458 Brabey, J. C. « KATHERINE VAN WINKLE PALMER 1963. The cases of Purpura and Ceratostoma. nomencl. 20: 251 - 253 Broperip, WILLIAM JOHN 1832. no title. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, pt. 2: 173 - 179 CERNOHORSKY, WALTER OLIVER 1964. The Cypraeidae of Fiji (Mollusca:Gastropoda) . The Veliger 6 (4): 177-201; plts. 21-26; 1 Text fig.; 1 map (1 April 1964) 1967. The Muricidae of Fiji (Mollusca : Gastropoda) Part I subfamilies Muricinae and Tritonaliinae. The Veliger 10 (2) : 111 - 132; plts. 14, 15; 11 text figs; 1 map (1 October 1967) CHEMNITZ, JoHANN HreronyMus 1780-1795. Neues systematisches Conchylien-Cabinet (conti- nuation of F H.W. Martini) Nimberg, vols. 4-11 Cooke, ALFrep Hanns, A. E. Suiptey « ER. GC. Reep 1895. | The Cambridge natural history; molluscs and brachio- pods. Macmillan « C., London, 3: i- xi; 1-535; 334 text figs.; maps Cooxe, ALFRED Hanps 1919. The radula in Thais, Drupa, Morula, Conchole pas, Cronia, Iopas, and the allied genera. Proc. Malacol. Soc. London 13 (3, 4): 90-110; 38 text figs. (16 April 1919) Dati, WititiAM HEALEY 1923. Notes on Drupa and Morula. Phila., 75: 303 - 306 DauTzenseErG, Puivipre & J.-L. BoucE 1933. Les mollusques testacés marins des établissements Fran- cais de l’Océanie. Journ. Conchyl. 77 (2): 145 - 326 (25 July 1933) Bull. zool. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. DEMOND, JOAN 1957. | Micronesian reef-associated gastropods. 11 (3): 275 - 341; plts. 1-4; 42 text figs. Dopcr, HENRY 1957. A historical review of the mollusks of Linnaeus. Part 5. The genus Murex of the class Gastropoda. _—_ Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. 113 (2): 77-224 (30 September 1957) Ductos, M. 1832. Description de quelques espéces de Pourpres, servant de type a six section établies dans ce genre. Ann. Sci. nat. Paris 26: 1-11; plts. 1, 2 DuNKER, WILHELM 1858-1870. Novitates conchoiogicae. Mollusca marina. Beschreib- ung und Abbildung neuer oder wenig bekannter Meeres-Con- chylien. Cassel, pp. 1 - 144; plts. 1-45 GMELIN, JOHANN FREDERICH 1791. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae decima tertia, aucta, reformata 1 (6): 3021 - 3910 Hase, TADASHIGE & SADAO KosucE 1966. Shells of the world in colour (Tropical Pacific). Hoikusha, Osaka 2: i- vii; 1- 193; 68 col. plts.; map (15 January 1966) 1967. The standard book of Japanese shells in colour. Hoikusha, Osaka 3: i - xviii; 1 - 223; 64 col. plts.; text figs. HEDLEY, CHARLES 1913. On the nomenclature of Drupa. (7): 79 - 80 HErRTLEIN, LEo GreorcEe 1960. The subfamily Drupinae (Gastropoda) in the eastern The Veliger 3 (1): 7-8 Pacif. Sci. (July 1957) Editio Lipsia. The Nautilus 27 Pacific. (1 July 1960) TREDALE, Tom 1911. | On the value of the gastropod apex in the classification. Proc. Malacol. Soc. London 9 (5): 319-323 (30 June 1911) 1929. Queensland molluscan notes, no. 1. Mem. Queensld. Mus. 9 (3): 261 - 297; plts. 30-31 IREDALE, Tom « DonaLtp F McMicHAEL 1962. A reference list of the marine Mollusca of New South Wales. Austral. Mus. (Sydney), Mem. 11: 1 - 109 (30 May 1962) (29 June 1929) KEEN, A. MyRA 1958. Sea shells of tropical West America; marine mollusks from Lower California to Colombia. i-xi + 624 pp.; illus. Stanford, Calif. (Stanford Univ. Press) 1964. Purpura, Ocenebra, and Muricanthus (Gastropoda) : Request for clarification of status. Z. N. (S.) 1621. Bull. zool. nomencl. 21 (3): 235 - 239 1964. Six misidentified type species in the superfamily Muni- cacea (Gastropoda). Z.N. (S.) 1623 21 (6): 422 - 428 KrieneErR, Louis CHARLES 1835. | Spécies géneral et iconographie des coquilles vivantes. Genre Pourpre. Paris, 8: 1 - 151; plts. 1 - 46 Knorr, GEorG WOLFGANG 1757-1772. Vergniigen der Augen und des Gemiiths, in Vorstel- lung einer allgemeinen Sammlung von Schnecken und Mu- scheln, welche im Meer gefunden werden. Nirmberg, vols. 1, 2; plts. 1-6 Kuropa, ToKuBEI & TADASHIGE HABE 1952. Check list and bibliography of the Recent marine mol- lusca of Japan. pp. 1-210; 2 maps. Tokyo, Japan. (4 April 1952) Bull. zool. nomencl. Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Page 315 Lamarck, JEAN-BapTisTE PreERRE ANTOINE DE MONET DE ReEEvE, Lovett Aucustus 1822. Histoire naturelle des animaux sans vertébres. 1846. | Conchologia Iconica: or illustrations of the shells of 7: 711 pp. Paris molluscous animals. Monograph of the genus Purpura. Link, Hernricu FriEpRicu 1807. Beschreibung der Naturaliensammlung der Universitat zu Rostock, 3'* Abth., pp. 101 - 160 (17 May, 1807) LInNAEusS, CAROLUS 1758. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae ... editio decima, reformata 1 [Regnum animale]. Stockholm (Laurentii Salvii) pp. 1 - 824+i- iii LisTER, MARTIN 1685-1692. Historiae sive synopsis methodicae conchyliorum. London, 2 Vols., 6 parts; 1057 plts. MartTINI, FrrEpRIcH HEINRICH WILHELM 1777. | Neues systematisches Conchylien-Cabinet. 3: 1-434; plts. 66 - 121 MENKE, Kart THEODOR 1829. VerzeichnifS$ der ansehnlichen Conchylien-Sammlung des Freiherrn von der Malsburg. Pyrmont, Heinrich Gelp- ke. pp. i-vi; 1 - 123 OostincH, C. H. 1931. Beitrag zur Kenntnis ter Molluskenfauna von Siid-Su- matra. Arch. Molluskenk. 63: 166 - 257; plts. 18 - 20 Orr-Maes, VIRGINIA 1967. ‘The littoral marine mollusks of Cocos-Keeling Islands (Indian Ocean). Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. 119 (4): 93 - 217; plts. 1 - 26; 4 text figs. (6 September 1967) PowELL_, ARTHUR WILLIAM BADEN 1962. Shells of New Zealand. Whitcombe & Tombs, Auck- land, 48 ed., pp. 1 - 203; plts. 1 - 36; text figs. REEvE, LovELL Aucustus 1845-1846. Conchologia Iconica: or Illustrations of the shells of molluscous animals. Monograph of the genus Murex. London, plts. 1 - 36 (April 1845 to April 1846) Nurnberg, London, plts. 1 - 13 (July 1846 to October 1846) 1846. | Conchologia Iconica: or illustrations of the shells of molluscous animals. Monograph of the genus Ricinula. London, plts. 1-6 (August 1846 to October 1846) RovERETO, GAETANO 1899. Prime ricerche sinonimiche sui generi dei gasteropodi. Atti. Soc. Lig. Sci. Nat. Geog. 10: 101 - 110 Ropinc, PETER FRIEDRICH 1798. Museum Boltenianum sive catalogus cimeliorum; pars secunda Conchylia. Hamburg, 1- viii; 1 - 199 (10 September 1798) SmirH, Epcar ALBERT 1913. Note on Murex mancinella Linn. Soc. London 10 (4): 287 - 289 Stimpson, WILLIAM Proc. Malacol. (28 March 1913) 1865. On certain genera and families of zoophagous gastero- pods [sic]. Amer. Journ. Conch. 1 (1): 55-64; plts. 8-9 (25 February 1865) THIELE, JOHANNES 1931-1935. Handbuch der systematischen Weichtierkunde. Jena, pp. 1- 1154; 893 text figs. [Muricidae: pp. 287 - 300] WEAVER, CLIFTON STOKES 1966. Corrected name for Drupa speciosa. Hawaiian Shell News 14 (14): 2; 2 figs. Wu, SuI-KuEI 1965. Comparative functional studies of the digestive system of the muricid gastropods Drupa ricina and Morula granu- lata. Malacologia 3 (2): 211 - 233; text figs. 1965a. Studies of the radulae of Taiwan muricid gastropods. Bull. Inst. Zool. Acad. Sinica 4: 95 - 106; 35 text figs. Page 316 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 Effects of Turbidity-Producing Substances in Sea Water on Eggs and Larvae of Three Genera of Bivalve Mollusks BY HARRY C. DAVIS AND HERBERT HIDU! Bureau of Commercial Fisheries, Biological Laboratory, Milford, Connecticut 06460 (7 Text figures) INTRODUCTION THE EFFECT OF SILT or other turbidity-producing sub- stances on shellfish generally, and particularly on oysters and their larvae, has long been of interest to biologists and to shellfish producers. In addition to the obvious damage to oyster beds silted over in harbor dredging and in building bridges and roads in estuarine areas, it has been suspected that turbidity from these sources affected larval development and setting of oysters. Lunz (1938), however, found no harmful effects from high turbidities on adult oysters or on spawning and setting, in his field study during the dredging of the Intra-Coastal Water- way of South Carolina, except where the oysters were actually buried by the spoil. Only a few studies of the effects of turbidity have been made under controlled conditions. LoosANoFF & Tom- MERS (1948) who, in laboratory experiments, studied the effects of a series of concentrations of turbidity-producing materials on adult oysters found that 0.1 gm of silt per liter of sea water reduced the pumping rate of adult oysters by 57% and that concentrations of 3 and 4 gms per liter reduced pumping by 94%. They reported gener- ally similar results with kaolin and chalk, and that 0.5 gm of Fuller’s earth per liter reduced pumping by 60%. More recently, Davis (1960) determined quantitatively the effects of a series of concentrations of several tur- bidity-producing substances on the percentage of eggs of the hard clam (Mercenaria (= Venus) mercenaria) that developed into normal straight-hinge larvae and on ' Present address: University of Maryland, Natural Resources Institute, Box 38, Solomons, Maryland 20688 the survival and growth of the larvae. In the work reported here the same techniques were used to determine the effects of several concentrations of silt, clay, and Fuller’s earth on embryonic development of the American oyster (Crassostrea virginica) and on survival and growth of larvae of the American oyster and the European oyster (Ostrea edulis). In addition, a series of experiments was run to com- pare the effects of different-sized particles of pure silicon dioxide on embryos and larvae of hard clams and Ameri- can oysters, in an attempt to determine the effect of particle size of a suspended material, as opposed to pos- sible effects of its chemical composition. MATERIALS ann METHODS The turbidity-producing materials used — silt, clay (ka- olin N. E VII Mallinckrodt)?, and Fuller’s earth (dusting powder, McKesson), — were the same as those used in the experiments on clam larvae (Davis, 1960). The silt was collected from the bed of Milford Harbor just upstream from the laboratory. It was washed through a 325-mesh screen to remove larger particles and debris, after which it was collected in a Buchner funnel and washed with distilled water to remove the salts. It was then dried at 200° C and the dried cake was ground in an all-ceramic jar mill. The Fuller’s earth was similarly ground. Fisher’s flotated silica powder (about 240 mesh) was used for the experiments to determine the effect of particle 2 Mention of trade names does not imply endorsement of com- mercial products by the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries. Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Page 317 size. It was suspended in distilled water and allowed to settle in a tall column. The settled plug was pushed out and cut into sections. The sections used were chosen to give particle sizes within the ranges: <5y, 5 - 25, and 25 - 50m. Particle-size determinations, made by Dr. Keith E. Chave, Director, Marine Science Center, Lehigh Uni- versity, are given in Table 1. Table 1 Percentages by weight of particles of different sizes composing the materials tested * Particle Fuller’s Sizes Silt Kaolin Earth > 62.5p 8.24 12.06 8.87 62.5 - 15.6u 28.36 6.03 18.16 15.6- 3.9u 39.10 10.72 26.10 3.9- 0.98 9.85 44.87 21.27 < 0.98y 14.54 26.32 25.60 Silicon Dioxide < Sp 5 - 25p 25 - 50u 125 - 64y — trace 1.8 62.4 - 31.2u — 1.3 17.3 31.2 - 15.6 — 9.3 64.9 15.6- 7.84 trace 84.8 16.0 7.8- 3.9u 4.1 2.4 trace 3.9- 1.95u 56.9 2.3 —_ 1.95 - 0.98 18.3 trace — 0.98 - 0.49u 17.2 — — < 0.49n 3.5 — — 3 Particle size determinations made by Dr. Keith E. Chave, Director, Marine Science Center, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsyl- vania In our larval cultures appreciable quantities of kaolin and Fuller’s earth, particularly at low concentrations, flocculated as particles 100u or more in size. Dr. Chave reported similar flocculations in his particle size deter- minations and believed, “the significant percentages of material greater than 62.54 probably represent floccula- tion of particles in the water” (personal communication). Concentrations of all materials are expressed as grams of dry powder per liter. In making up a suspension, a weighed quantity of the powdered material was thorough- ly mixed with sea water and the various experimental concentrations were prepared by serial dilution. The methods for obtaining fertilized oyster eggs out of season have been described, as have methods for deter- mining the percentage of eggs developing to the straight- hinge larval stage, and for determining the survival and rate of growth of larvae (LoosanorF & Davis, 1963). In all experiments the sea water in the larval cultures was changed every second day and larvae in all cultures were fed a mixture of Isochrysis galbana and Mono- chrysis lutheri daily. The quantity and quality of food were the same for all cultures within an experiment since each culture received an equal volume of algal food. The quantity and quality of food in successive experiments, however, were not necessarily equal, due to changes in the algal cultures and sea water. Duplicate cultures were used in each experiment at each concentration of sus- pended material. Temperatures of all cultures were main- tained between 23° C and 25°C and salinity between 26 ANC OAc: European oyster larvae may start setting 8 days after release under optimum conditions and are, thereafter, not available for quantitative sampling. Consequently, samples for determining percentage survival and rate of growth of these larvae were taken on the 7" day after the larvae were released, i.e., after 7 days at experimental condi- tions. Few American oyster larvae set before the 14" day even under near-optimum conditions. Samples of American oyster larvae, therefore, were taken on the 14" day after fertilization or after 12 days at the experimental conditions. Some clam larvae may reach setting size and undergo metamorphosis as early as the 8" day, but even these early post-setting stages can be suspended and accurate quantitative samples can be taken as late as the 12" day after fertilization, i.e., after 10 days at the experimental conditions. EFFECTS on EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT Silt was more harmful to American oyster embryos than either clay (kaolin) or Fuller’s earth. As little as 0.188¢/1 of silt had a significant effect on the percentage of oyster eggs developing to the straight-hinge larval stage, whereas Fuller’s earth had no significant effect until concentrations exceeded 1g/1 and kaolin had no sig- nificant effect until concentrations exceeded 2g/1 (Table 2). Moreover, in only one experiment did any (3%) of the oyster eggs develop normally in 1g/1 of silt, whereas the average number developing normally, for all experi- ments in 4g/l1 was 26% for Fuller’s earth and 76% in kaolin. Davis (1960) found that a normal number of clam eggs developed in silt concentrations as high as 0.75g/I, but it required only 0.125g/1 of Fuller’s earth or 0.5g/1 of kaolin to cause a significant reduction in the number of clam eggs developing normally. The experiments re- ported here show that oyster embryos are less tolerant of silt than are clam embryos, but oyster embryos are considerably more tolerant of kaolin and Fuller’s earth Page 318 than are clam embryos. Results with clam eggs and with oyster eggs were similar, however, in that no embryos of either species developed normally at the higher con- centrations of silt, whereas a significant number of em- bryos of both species did develop normally in even the highest concentrations (4g/1) of kaolin and Fuller’s earth. Table 2 Percentage of clam and American oyster eggs developing to the straight-hinge larval stage in different concen- trations of suspended materials. The number of eggs developing to the straight-hinge stage in control cultures was considered 100% Concentration Silt Kaolin Fuller’s Earth grams/liter Clam4 Oyster Clam* Oyster Clam*+ Oyster 0.0 (controls) 100 100 100 100 100 ~=©100 0.125 95 95 82 100 75 104 0.188 90 78 — — — — 0.250 96 73 82 100 61 103 0.375 93 66 — — — — 0.500 99 31 52 104 41 102 0.750 92 9 — _ — — 1.000 79 3 37 +108 57 98 1.500 65 0 — — — — 2.000 39 0 49 94 50 79 3.000 0 0 — — = — 4.000 0 0 42 76 45 26 Silicon Dioxide Particles < Su 5 - 25u 25 - 50p Clam Oyster Clam Oyster Clam Oyster 0.0 (controls) 100 ~=100 100 ~=100 100 ~=100 0.125 106 94 106 =105 114 = 112 0.250 105 109 96 104 98 94 0.500 105 93 98 106 102 100 1.000 OD) 107 945 103 98 111 2.000 85 =114 CP iY 96 109 4.000 69 = 123 103 96 92 ly 4 from Davis, 1960 The experiments with silt, kaolin, and Fuller’s earth led us to conclude, tentatively, that the larger particles present in silt and, to a lesser extent, in kaolin and Ful- ler’s earth were primarily responsible for the deleterious effects on oyster eggs, whereas the smaller particles, most numerous in kaolin, were probably responsible for the effect on clam eggs. The percentage of oyster eggs developing normally did not decrease significantly, however, in any of the various concentrations of silicon dioxide tested, regardless of particle size. Moreover, only at the highest concentrations THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 of the smallest particles of silicon dioxide did the per- centage of clam eggs developing normally decrease sig- nificantly. Obviously, then, the decreases in the percentage of clam and oyster eggs developing in the higher concen- trations of silt, kaolin, and Fuller’s earth, and the dif ferences between their effects arc not wholly the result of differences in particle size. Although silicon dioxide has a higher density than the other substances tested and fewer particles of any given size per unit of weight, it seems unlikely that this difference alone can account for the difference in results. Although 4¢/1 of silicon dioxide gave no reduction in the percentage of oyster eggs developing normally, only 1g/1 of silt reduced the number by 97%. Even if the silicon dioxide were 4 times as dense as the silt, there should be at least as many particles in 4g of silicon dioxide as in 1g of silt. EFFECTS on SURVIVAL or LARVAE European oyster larvae were the most hardy of the 3 species tested in that survival did not decrease significant- ly in concentrations up to 4g/1 of any of the suspended material used, except kaolin (Figures la, 2a, 3a). This result is in striking contrast to that with clam larvae, which showed a fair survival in 4g/ of silt but no survival in 1g/1 of either kaolin or Fuller’s earth (Davis, 1960). American oyster larvae were less tolerant of silt than either European oyster larvae or clam larvae, for as little as 0./5g/1 of silt caused a significant decrease in the per- centage of American oyster larvae surviving. American oyster larvae, nevertheless, were more tolerant of kaolin and Fuller’s earth than were clam larvae. Approximately 27 to 34% survived in 4g/1 of either kaolin or Fuller’s earth. We noted that many clam larvae, in the presence of the smaller particles of kaolin and Fuller’s earth, eventu- tually lost their ability to reject these particles. The lar- vae then ingested the particles, the stomach became packed, and the larvae died. We postulated that both species of oyster larvae were better able to reject these small particles and, hence, showed a lower mortality than clam larvae in kaolin and Fuller’s earth. The experiments with silicon dioxide indicated that it is primarily the smaller particles that affect survival. Both hard clam (Figure 4a) and American oyster (Figure 5a) larvae suffered severe mortality at comparatively low (0.5g/1) concentrations of the smallest (up to 5u) par- ticles, whereas neither species suffered significant mortali- ty at values as great as 4g/1 of the larger particles; even at 4g/l of the smallest particles of silicon dioxide, how- ever, mortality was not as great as with lesser concentra- tions of some of the other materials. Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Page 319 The effects of kaolin and Fuller’s earth, for example, particularly at higher concentrations, on survival and growth of clam larvae were more drastic than would be expected from the effect of silicon particles of similar size. Nevertheless, the much greater mortality of clam and oyster larvae in the presence of the smallest particles of silicon dioxide, as compared to mortality in the presence of larger particles, did follow the same trend as with kaolin and Fuller’s earth. The observation of numerous oyster larvae with their guts packed with silicon particles demonstrated that the American oyster larvae could not reject these small silicon dioxide particles as successfully as they did the particles of kaolin or Fuller’s earth. Euro- pean oyster larvae, however, were apparently capable of rejecting all suspended particles and, hence, suffered little mortality. EFFECTS on GROWTH or LARVAE The effects of suspended material on growth of both species of oyster larvae were somewhat different from their effects on clam larvae. For example, silt had no deleterious effect on growth of clam larvae until con- centrations reached 1g/l, and growth was not reduced drastically until silt concentrations were in excess of 2g/I. Moreover, clam larvae showed evidence of feeding even in 4g/1 of silt although growth was negligible (Davis, 1960). Larvae of American and European oysters reared in 0.75g/1 of silt, however, suffered a significant reduction in growth and those in 2g/] and over did not grow at all (Figure 1b). At 3g/l and 4g/1 of silt all American oyster larvae eventually died. Even though most European oyster larvae survived at all silt concentrations, reduction in growth of these larvae at concentrations of 1g/1 and less was more drastic than for clam or American oyster larvae. Conversely, both species of oyster larvae tolerated ka- olin (Figure 2b) and Fuller’s earth (Figure 3b) better than clam larvae did. Growth of clam larvae was drasti- cally reduced by 0.5g/1 of either kaolin or Fuller’s earth and all clam larvae were killed by 1g/1 of either material (Davis, 1960). Growth of American oyster larvae, on the other hand, was not significantly reduced by 1g/I1 of kaolin. Moreover, in at least 3 of the 4 experiments these oyster larvae showed appreciable growth in 2g/1 of kaolin and growth of European oyster larvae was significantly affected only in concentrations of 4g/l of kaolin (Figure 2b). Fuller’s earth had a more deleterious effect than kaolin on growth of both species of oyster larvae. Nevertheless, both species showed significant growth and good survival at 1g/l of Fuller’s earth, but American oyster larvae showed only fair survival and no appreciable growth at 2g/l. European oyster larvae still showed good survival and fair growth even at 2g/1 of Fuller’s earth (Figure 3b). Growth of clam larvae was not seriously affected by concentrations up to 2g/1 of either the 25-50 or the 5 - 25u particles of silicon dioxide (Figure 4b). Even in the presence of the smallest particles (<5) growth of the clam larvae that survived was fairly good. Results with American oyster larvae (Figure 5b) were similar. The rate of growth decreased at almost all concentrations of all particle sizes of silicon dioxide, but the largest particles interfered least with growth of these larvae. Even in the presence of the smallest particles that interfered most, with oyster larvae, as with clam larvae, those that sur- vived showed appreciable growth. VARIATIONS AMONG SUCCESSIVE EXPERIMENTS AND POSSIBLE CAUSES Davis & CHANLEY (1956) pointed out that the first evi- dence of toxicity to larvae, either of toxins produced by living microorganisms or of synthetic chemical toxins, was a reduction in the growth rate of larvae. It was sug- gested by Davis (1960) that the more rapid growth of clam larvae in the lower concentrations of silt, kaolin, and Fuller’s earth was due, in part, to chelation or adsorption of toxic substances present in the sea water or produced by the algae and bacterial contaminants added as foods. In the 3 experiments with silt, the effect of silt in con- centrations of 0.5g/1 and lower was to increase the rate of growth of the oyster larvae. The rate of growth of the larvae differed somewhat in the 3 consecutive ex- periments, but the increases in length, when converted to percentages of the length increase in control cultures, were in general agreement and results of the 3 experi- ments were averaged to give the curve plotted in Figure 1b. Four experiments were run with kaolin and Fuller’s earth concurrently but subsequent to the experiments with silt and, consequently, the food cultures and sea water were different. Growth of larvae in the control cultures was poor in Experiments 2 and 3, of the 4 con- secutive experiments, and the shapes of the curves are different from those of Experiments 1 and 4 in which growth of larvae in control cultures was normal (Figures 6, 7). We believe the poor growth of larvae in the control cultures was due to an excessive amount of toxins pro- duced by microorganisms present in the sea water or, possibly, by toxin-producing bacteria contaminating our algal food cultures. When the quantity of toxins appeared to be low (Ex- periments 1, 4) (“normal” for our laboratory cultures) Page 320 growth was optimum in about 0.5g/1 of kaolin, i. e., 0.5g/1 was sufficient to adsorb the toxins (Figure 6). When the quantity of toxins appeared to be greater (Experiments 2, 3), about 1g/l of kaolin was required to adsorb the toxins and give optimum growth, whereas at the lower concentrations the harmful effects of suspended mate- rials and toxins almost appeared to be additive (Figure 6). The data from the experiments with Fuller’s earth gave less clear-cut but similar results. When the concentration of toxins was low (Experiments 1, 4) 0.25g to 0.5g/1 was sufficient to adsorb the toxins, whereas 0.5g/1 or, perhaps, slightly more was required when the concentration of toxins was high (Experiments 2, 3, and Figure 7). Of the materials used, only silt caused any appreciable change in the pH of our sea water. Even with silt the maximum change in pH was from 7.5 (normal for our laboratory sea water) to 6.40. Other experiments have shown that at pH 6.40 the decrease in the proportion of clam or oyster eggs developing into normal larvae and in the survival and growth of larvae of these two genera of bivalves is less drastic than is caused by silt alone (CaLaB- RESE & Davis, 1966). A portion of the effect of silt may be attributable, nevertheless, to its effect on the pH of sea water. Other possible causes for the difference in effects of silt, kaolin, Fuller’s earth, and silicon dioxide include possible soluble toxic components or, more probably, dif- ferences in their adsorptive and chelating characteristics. Silt, a mixture of organic and inorganic materials, would seem most likely to contain toxic components and highly effective chelators capable of causing mortality of embry- os or larvae by over-chelation. Our experiments indicate that bivalve larvae can toler- ate turbidities higher than those normally encountered in natural waters, and that under certain circumstances low concentrations of turbidity-producing materials may be beneficial. Nevertheless, higher silt concentrations, such as those produced by dredging or filling operations, could be detrimental to bivalve larvae, both as a direct effect of the particulate matter and, indirectly, as a result of lowered pH. We also suspect that, in natural waters, disturbing the bottom may release numerous bacteria, some of which may be toxic, and organic enrichment sufficient to enable these bacteria to reproduce rapidly. The effect of dredging, therefore, may be more deleterious to bivalve larvae than would be indicated by their tolerance to turbidity-pro- ducing materials alone. SUMMARY 1. As little as 0.188g/1 of silt caused a significant de- crease in the percentage of oyster eggs developing nor- THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 mally, as did 3g/1 of kaolin or 4g/1 of Fuller’s earth. 2. The percentage of American oyster eggs developing normally was not affected by concentrations of silicon dioxide of 4g/1, regardless of particle size. Clam eggs were affected only at 4g/1 of the smallest particles (<5). 3. Survival of European oyster larvae was less affected by silt, kaolin, and Fuller’s earth than was survival of larvae of either American oysters or hard clams. 4, The smallest particles (<(5y) of silicon dioxide had the greatest effect on survival and growth of clam and oyster larvae. Larger particles (5-25 and 25 - 50m) had little effect on survival of either species or on growth of clam larvae. Growth of American oyster larvae de- creased progressively as the size of silicon dioxide par- ticles was decreased. 3. Growth of European oyster larvae was less affected by kaolin and Fuller’s earth than was growth of larvae of the American oyster or hard clam, but was more strongly affected by silt than was growth of larvae of either of the other two species. 6. Bivalve larvae grew faster in low concentrations of turbidity-producing substances than in clear sea water, possibly because the suspended particles chelate or ad- sorb toxins present in larval cultures. The “optimum” concentration of suspended material probably depends upon the amount of toxin to be chelated or adsorbed. LITERATURE CITED CALABRESE, ANTHONY & Harry Caru Davis 1966. The pH tolerance of embryos and larvae of Mercenaria Biol. Bull. 131 (3) : mercenaria and Crassostrea virginica. 427 - 436 (December 1966) Davis, Harry Cari 1960. Effects of turbidity-producing materials in sea water on eges and larvae of the clam (Venus (Mercenaria) mercenaria). Biol. Bull. 118 (1): 48 - 54 Davis, Harry Cari & Paut Epwin CHANLEY 1956. Effects of some dissolved substances on bivalve larvae. Proc. Nat. Shellfish. Assoc. 46: 59 - 74 LoosanorF, Victor Lyon « Harry Cart Davis 1963. Rearing of bivalve mollusks In: Advances in Marine Biology, F S. RussEiu (ed.), Acad. Press, London 1: 1 - 136 LoosanorrF, Victor Lyon & Frances DorEetTa TOMMERS 1948. Effect of suspended silt and other substances on the rate of feeding of oysters. Science 107: 69 - 70 Lunz, Ropert GEORGE 1938. Part I. Oyster culture with reference to dredging oper- ations in South Carolina, 1 - 135. Part II. The effects of the flood- ing of the Santee River in April 1936, on oysters in the Cape Romain area of South Carolina. Rep. U.S. Engineer Office, South Carolina, 1 - 33 * Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Page 321 ‘ * Crassostrea virgini 160 — PERCE ° ° Crassostrea virginica (after 12 days exposure) ° : (after 12 days exposure) | Ctoccooe ° Ostrea edulis 140; : 160+ fe q Me Cnecrooosed * Ostrea edulis a ae) ays SHORE) \ (after 7 days exposure) | 140+ ier: Mee ee 1207 \ OssesaHe « Mercenaria mercenaria oe 1960) : wae (Davis, 1960) i-t) ae’ ~o-0\_ “gral (after 10 ae exposure) § 100" oe (after 10 days exposure) | o use 1S) “a g o Ss | s os | n i a 3 : | ec 3 : o op [=¥) . | SS | 20} js : SAS poamaaa aera A ) OR eis ee MAR ako 4.0 eearsee, L pent, . grams per liter ) 0.5 #%110 1.5 20 2.5 3.0 4.0 grams per liter Figure 1a Figure 1b Percentage survival of three genera of bivalve larvae reared in Increase in mean length of three genera of bivalve larvae, grown in sea water suspensions containing different concentrations of silt. different concentrations of suspended silt, plotted as percentages of The number of larvae surviving in control cultures the increase in mean length of larvae in control cultures. was considered 100%. a [ = e Crassostrea virginica 165 ° ° Crassostrea virginica 160 \(after 12 days exposure) (after 12 days exposure) Sa is *|Ostrea edulis | yeni e Ostrea edulis 140} (after 7 days exposure) | 1407 (after 7 days exposure) Ore * Mercenaria mercenaria | . . i} e------ e Mercenaria mercenaria Pool (Davis, 1960) | 120} « (Davis, 1960) ° (after 10 days exposure) | Fea ets eS (after 10 days exposure) © Ee Reo Casboso99n09K2200%% Soe | Be PROP caerr “, 2 100k \ S 100F**, oe s ; . | peony oe eS 5 2 \ Np = g \ 2 \ eae A © 8or \ ° 2 80r \ eye ee \ One Coe « \ [s) \ “0 fel e a N 85, + 60f \ B fo: sy : ‘ c Bo \ 40} \ | - 407 ‘ Ys \ 20r i" 207 \ \ | ‘ 1. ® —t 4 —tL 1 g . ® is ere fm fo) i 1.0 Te 2.0 2. Ae) 0 ° 05 %11.0 1.5 20 25 3.0 4,0 0.5 5 of ie 3 4 grams per liter gramsip. Figure 2a Figure 2b Percentage survival of three genera of bivalve larvae reared in Increase in mean length of three genera of bivalve larvae, grown in different concentrations of suspended kaolin. The number of larvae different concentrations of suspended kaolin, plotted as percentages surviving in control cultures was considered 100%. of the increase in mean length of larvae in control cultures. Page 322 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 ° e Crassostrea virginica — (after 12 days exposure) 140} . ° Crassostrea virginica i 140+ . Sheen * Ostrea edulis (after 12 days exposure) (after 7 days exposure) AeA Orreeeees ° Ostrea edulis 120} e-----=- * Mercenaria mercenaria (after 7 days exposure) (Davis, 1960) a Qzeesnas ¢ Mercenaria mercenaria ne _ ees 10 days exposure) 2, FENN cn (Davis, 1960) ts tae 8 \ bce (after 10 days exposure) encdctelo Vator (= 4 “095, “4 S 80 | #9 oO ‘ ‘° “8, 3 8ot ~~ g 4 : © Gap | OF 1 + 6 L S 1 g 00 : \ o H 2 E, o 407 \ . 407 \ yo 5) : \ | 207 me 207 \ SS ‘ (ee ee a a aT. F —— ih Z| : eee otis eds eae ya fo) 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 4.0 ° 0.5 1.0 im a® Be 3.0 4.0 grams per liter grams per liter Figure 3a Figure 3b Percentage survival of three genera of bivalve larvae reared in different concentrations of suspended Fuller’s earth. The number of Increase in mean length of three genera of bivalve larvae, grown in larvae surviving in control cultures was considered 100%. different concentrations of suspended Fuller’s earth, plotted as per- centages of the increase in mean length of larvae in control cultures. ial ’ 120 3 7 . BO a | fey ee ass eee ‘| z eas [TOO fegx¢=~ g==— == gg — by |i | g oy : = ===2 nnd gg 80; : *-----*| & 5 micron particles = 80} Bie Et Psi ‘ Onanesce *|5- 25 micron particles | 2 a at Peceo2acon3<9. Sob 8 *——. 25 - 50 micron particles Saf a F en ; 4 4 | oO | ‘ | | = B, 40; | : 40} Para | ag gies sear ° Casncbnios * <5 micron particles eal : 2or »------» 5 - 25 micron particles 0 e 25 - 50 micron particles ° 0.5 1.0 15 2.0 ; 4.0 0 0.5 a 1.5 DD wate grams per liter grams per liter Figure 4a Figure 4b Percentage survival of clam larvae reared in different concentrations Increase in mean length of clam larvae grown in different concen- of suspended silicon dioxide particles of three different particle sizes. trations of suspended silicon dioxide of three different particle sizes. The number of larvae surviving in control cultures The increase in mean length is plotted as a percentage of the was considered 100%. —- increase in mean length of larvae in control cultures. Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Page 323 120 ee = 5 = = 100K YN, | : ee Hea, Kg 3 80}: s 80+ aa DISS S Sea i ime le ee = ; 5 =. @ Gor § e-....-e <5 micron particles es a) 5 siezale: * 5-25 micron particles 2 i 3 gol * * 25 - 50 micron particles S$ 40+ SUNOS 0s Se eee Paco ssoh cabaret A io A e nana Canora | e e------@ <5 micron particles GYAL Sol GN ie ane a cPERREOcao paca Onboentne CosqoocHcoooBHeDeHo@oanen cod | 20- : : | e------- * 5-25 micron particles | . * 25-50 micron particles | FS 05 a Tae eD 4.0 o Of LO mA 20 4.0 grams per liter Figure 5a Percentage survival of American oyster larvae reared in different concentrations of suspended silicon dioxide particles of three differ- ent sizes. The number of larvae surviving in control cultures was considered 100%. 190 Leger ae zee eee : * Experiment 1 Gop =e aoe eane Experiment 12) -— —.— Experiment 3 170[° % Oneonaooens + Experiment 4 - fop) (o) SI ay Y» / a ae mean length in microns oo ° = —— 2 —— o 05 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 CONCENTRATIONS IN GRAMS PER LITER Figure 6 Effect of different concentrations of kaolin on mean length of American oyster larvae at 14 days in four separate experiments. Points plotted are averages for duplicate cultures at each concentration in each experiment. grams per liter Figure 5b Increase in mean length of American oyster larvae grown in differ- ent concentrations of suspended silicon dioxide of three different particle sizes. The increase in mean length is plotted as a percentage of the increase in mean length of larvae in control cultures. 180 ] | | * Experiment 1 | « Experiment 2 | ¢ Experiment 3 -* Experiment 4 | \]\ - \ Oh mean length in microns —s es 1007, . 80r Etat 4 | foe i 1 L I QO Of 1 2.0 3.0 4.0 CONCENTRATIONS IN GRAMS PER LITER Figure 7 Effect of different concentrations of suspended Fuller's earth on mean length of American oyster larvae at 14 days in four separate experiments. Points plotted are averages for duplicate cultures at each concentration in each experiment. Page 324 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 A New Species of Murexsul from the Galapagos Islands BY WILLIAM K. EMERSON AND ANTHONY D’ATTILIO Department of Living Invertebrates, American Museum of Natural History Seventy-ninth Street and Central Park West, New York, New York 10024 (Plate 50; 1 Text figure) THROUGH THE KINDNESS of Mrs. Jacqueline DeRoy and Mrs. Carmen Angermeyer of Academy Bay, Santa Cruz Island, Galapagos Islands, we are privileged to describe a new muricid species which we have placed in the genus Murexsul on the basis of shell morphology and radular- opercular characters. Murexsul jacquelinae EMERSON & D’ATTILIO, spec. nov. Plate 50; Text figure 1 The shell is small, pink, flesh-colored, with numerous, fine, deeply cut, scabrous, spiral ridges; there are 5 post-nucle- ar whorls preserved, the nepionic whorls being eroded. The fusiform shell has a centrally located, medium sized aperture; the whorls are angled, with an impressed su- ture, and there are, on the penultimate whorl of the spire, 8 spiral ridges that are of equal size with the inter- spaces; these are crossed axially by 8 varices, at the most elevated point of which the spiral ridges develop into upturned open spines; both spiral and axial sculpturing gradually increase in number on each succeeding whorl. The body whorl has 6 varices crossed by 5 spiral ridges, which are similar in character to those of the spire, above the shoulder angle; these are followed by 6 ridges below the shoulder; the canal has 4 additional ridges, with some of intermediate and minor development. The varices, on the elevated portion of the body whorl, have spiral ridges that form more prominent spines than those developed on the spire. The aperture is ovate, vividly colored a rosy-violet; the inner lip is elevated mostly posteriorly; the crenulated labrum is sculptured within, reflecting the exterior ridges. The siphonal canal is long, narrowly opened, and slightly recurved; it is broad above where it possesses only growth striae on its flattened surface; below it is narrowly tube- like; on the left the canal bears the distal portion of previous canals which are the projecting ends of the varices of the body whorl. The operculum is muricid, with a basal nucleus. The radular characters (Text figure 1) suggest placement of the new species in the genus Murexsul IREDALE, 1915. Drawings of the radula of Murex octogonus Quoy & Gamarp, 1833, the type species of Murexsul, were pre- viously published by Hutton, (1883; plt. 13, fig. C) and by Ponper (1968, plt. 1, fig. 1). Measurements: Holotype, 20.4 mm in length, 11.1 mm in width; largest paratype, 26.3 mm in length, 15.6 mm in width. Explanation of Plate 50 Murexsul jacquelinae EMERSON & D’ATTILIO0, spec. nov. Figures 1, 2: Holotype (A. M. N.H. No. 147968), 100 m off Tagus Cove, Isabella Island, Galapagos Islands; 3. Operculum in aperture. Figures 3, 4: Paratype (A.M.N.H.No. 147969), 50m off Bar- rington Island, Galapagos Islands; 3. Note foreign growths and drill hole. Figures 5, 6: Paratype (coll. D’Attilio) 30m off Jervis Island, Galapagos Islands; 3. Labrum broken. [EMERSON & D’ATTILI0] Plate 50 THE VELIcER, Vol. 11, No. 4 Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Page 325 Type Locality: Off Tagus Cove, Isabella Island, Gala- pagos Islands in 100 m, January 30, 1968, by the DeRoys, holotype (Plate 50, Figures 1, 2) and 2 paratypes. Figure 1 Murexsul jacquelinae Emerson « D’ArtTILIO, spec. nov. Two lateral teeth and a central tooth from the radula of the holotype; 300 Remarks: The new Galapagan species may be distin- guished from its apparent congeners in the eastern Pa- cific, Murexsul vittatus (Broperip, 1833) and Murexsul lappa (Broperip, 1833), by their possession of heavier and coarser sculptured shells that have fewer spiral ridges. Additionally, the shells of MZ. vittatus may be essentially white or may be colored with brown or blackish bands, and the shells of Af. lappa are commonly white with 2 broad, ochre-colored bands. The aperture of the new Galapagan species is distinctively colored a rosy-violet. Type Repositories: Holotype, A. M.N. H. No. 147968 and 2 paratypes from the type locality (DeRoy Collection) ; 3 paratypes from off Barrington Island, Galapagos Is- lands in 50 m, by the DeRoys, December 29, 1967 (1 - A. M.N.H. No. 147969; 2 - D’Attilio Collection) ; 1 paratype from off North Barrington Island, Galapagos Islands, in 55 - 64 m, by the Angermeyers, 1967 (ex Angermeyer Col- lection) ; 1 paratype from off Jervis Island, Galapagos Islands, in 30 m, by the DeRoys, March 22, 1967 (DeRoy Collection ). The largest paratypic specimen represents a more ma- ture growth stage than that of the holotype (Plate 50, Figures 1, 2) and a figured paratype (Plate 50, Figures 3, 4). This specimen, here illustrated, Plate 50, Figures 5, 6, which was collected dead, is bleached white, with the labrum badly broken. It shows the mature character of the elevated ridges with the long, spiny processes on the varices. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS In addition to the Angermeyers and the DeRoys, we are indebted to Professor Masao Azuma of Nishinomiya, Japan, who kindly provided us with the original radular drawing from which we have drafted the present drawing. Our colleague, William E, Old, Jr., assisted us in various ways. LITERATURE CITED Broperip, WILLIAM JOHN 1833. | Characters of new species of Mollusca and Conchifera collected by Mr. Cuming. 1832 (prt. 2): 173-179 Hutton, FREDERICK WOLLASTON 1883. | Notes on some branchiate Gastropoda. Trans. Proc. New Zealand Inst. 1882, 15: 118-131; plts. 13 - 16 (May 1883) Proc. Zool. Soc. London for (14 January 1833) TrREDALE, Tom 1915. A commentary on Suter’s “Manual of New Zealand Mollusca.” Trans. Proc. New Zealand Inst. 47: 417 - 497 Ponper, W. F. 1968. Nomenclatural notes on some New Zealand rachiglos- san gastropods with descriptions of five new species. Rec. Domin. Mus. 6 (4): 29-47; plts. 1-5 Quoy, JEAN RENE Constant, & JosEpH PAuL GaIMarRD 1833. | Voyage de découvertes de l’Astrolabe exécuté par ordre du Roi, pendant les années 1826 - 1829, sous le commandement de M. J. Dumont d’Urvile. Zoologie, Mollusca 2: 321 - 686 Page 326 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 Predators on Olivella biplicata, Including a Species-Specific Predator Avoidance Response BY D. CRAIG EDWARDS ! Department of Zoology, University of Chicago, and Department of Oceanography, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, California (Plate 51; 1 Text figure) IN THE COURSE OF MORE GENERAL STUDIES of Olivella biplicata (SowerBy, 1825) (Epwarps, 1965, 1968) it has been possible to assemble for the first time a list of its predators with some observations on their feeding. The predators include Octopus sp., Conus californicus Hinps, 1844, Polinices recluzianus (DESHAYES, 1839), Pisaster brevispinus (Stimpson, 1857), Astropecten armatus Gray, 1840, one or more species of crabs, shore birds, and man. Olivella was also found to exhibit a specific, vigorous es- cape response to Pisaster brevispinus, but not to P ochra- ceus (BRANpbT, 1835) or Astropecten armatus. The new information on predators extends food lists and will aid community energetics studies; it should also facilitate fur- ther studies of the ecology of O. biplicata and could form the basis of a thorough investigation of the effect of predation on this long-lived (see below), abundant, inter- tidal gastropod. The demonstration of a species-specific avoidance response to a predator adds to the growing literature on this ecologically important form of chemi- cal communication. Field work was done from Newport, Oregon, to Ensen- ada, Baja California. Most observations were made at low tide when the animals were exposed or shallowly immersed; snorkeling was also used at most sites. Labora- tory studies were done at the Oregon Institute of Marine Biology, Charleston, Oregon, and at Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, California. PREDATORS The most diverse and possibly the chief predators on adult Olwella biplicata are other mollusks. Numerous laboratory and field observations by R. T: Paine (personal communi- cation), N. Fotheringham (personal communication) , and myself show O. biplicata of all sizes (8.5 to 26.1 mm) ' Present address: Department of Zoology, University of Massa- chusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01002 are eaten by small Octopus bimaculoides PickForD & McConnaucHeEYy, 1949, or O. bimaculatus VERRILL, 1883, or both, in southern California. (Olivella size data herein- after are shell lengths from siphonal canal to apex.) The octopuses emerge from beneath rocks on sand flats, seize Olivella, drill a very small hole (ca. 0.5mm maximum external diameter) near the shell apex (edge of body whorl or on whorl above; Plate 51, Figure 1), and appar- ently inject a paralyzing venom (see Pirson & TayLor, 1961). The effect of Octopus predation on natural Oli- vella populations, however, appears small: very few emp- ty Olivella shells bear Octopus bore holes (see below), and the proportion remains small even when shells are collected near a regularly occupied Octopus burrow. Several gastropods eat Olivella. In the San Diego, California, area Conus californicus eats O. biplicata both in aquaria and in the field (SAUNDERS & WoLFson, 1961); and, of 56 known observations of prey taken by this pred- ator in nature, more (10) were of O. biplicata than any other species (KoHN, 1966). Conus swallows its prey whole and may prefer small Olivella: two large C. cali- fornicus (> 25mm) kept in an aquarium provided with running sea water, a sand substrate, and 20 medium to large O. biplicata (20- 28mm) for three weeks ate no Olivella. Another carnivorous prosobranch, Polinices recluzianus, widely co-occurs with Olivella biplicata in California and Baja California, and a small percentage of empty O. bi- plicata shells from the field regularly bears the character- istic countersunk bore hole of this predator (Plate 51, Figure 2). Polinices, which is rarely abundant, feeds primarily on bivalves; it also accepts gastropods as alter- native food, but probably takes few olives in nature (see below). The maximum rate of predation on O. biplicata, were no other prey available, was determined, using three Polinices of similar size (means and standard errors: 33.43 + 1.05 mm shell height & 29.50 + 1.15 mm shell width; 1531 + 234 mgm shell-free dry weight). The predators were first acclimated to eating Olivella in cap- Vol. 11; No. 4 tivity and then placed in an aquarium provided with running sea water, a sand substrate, and ca. 20 prey ranging in size from 18.3 to 28.4mm. The three Poli- nices (4593 mgm total shell-free dry weight) ate 13 O. biplicata (4198 mgm total shell-free dry weight) in 15 days (3-18 November 1965); thus, the Polinices con- sumed 6% of their own dry weight per day. This feeding rate, while exceeding the 1.2 to 4.6% rate of some species of Conus in the tropics (Koun, 1959, and in press), falls far short of the 15 - 25% of body weight per day rates given for other predatory gastropods, including Polinices duplicatus (Say, 1822) and other Conus (THorson, 1958; Koun, in press). Possibly the non-preferred prey status of Olivella and the season of observations — many predaceous gastropods feed little, if at all, in winter — or both affected the feeding rate of P recluzianus. The feeding behavior of Polinices recluzianus is like that described for other naticids (Gonor, 1965; FRETTER & GRAHAM, 1962). Prey are seized with the propodium, drawn under the predator, and wrapped up in the con- cave ventral surface of the mesopodium. Under attack, Olivella moves with strong forward lurches and often for- ces its way under or around the enclosing mesopodium; es- capees then continue their lurching progression for 8 - 10 cm. Polinices recluzianus may carry captured prey around in the mesopodium before burrowing into the sand and drilling them. Through apparently stereotyped behavior in the handling of prey, P recluzianus always bores O. biplicata on the body whorl near the posterior end of the aperture (Plate 51, Figure 2). Boring the shell seems an extremely inefficient way to attack Olivella, whose oper- culum is a thin corneous scale. In fact, of 21 O. biplicata eaten in aquarium trials, only 4 were completely bored, 14 were incompletely bored, and 3 were unbored. Incom- pletely bored, empty Olivella shells are also taken in the field. Although Polinices may occasionally force its prey’s operculum, the incomplete bore holes suggest another ex- planation, viz., that O. biplicata suffocates while wrapped in the predator’s foot and relaxes. Since Olivella suffers no harm from being deeply withdrawn into its shell for 10 hours or more in response to osmotic stress (EDWARDS, 1965), this answer requires the snails be deprived of oxygen for lengthy periods. Moribund, but unbored, O. biplicata can be recovered from P. recluzianus. Since par- tially drilled, live snails also occur, escape is still possible after drilling begins. Probably the length of time the prey is enveloped in the predator’s foot determines the mode of death. Although Olivella biplicata often frees itself from Poll- nices grasp, both the largest (28.4mm) and smallest (17.0 mm) individuals available in feeding trials were eaten by the medium-sized P recluzianus: neither was there any statistically significant difference between the THE VELIGER Page 327 sizes of Olivella taken and those surviving, though sample sizes were inadequate (13 vs. 9 respectively). Other field and laboratory observations by N. Fotheringham (person- al communication) and myself show olives of all sizes (10.4 - 28.4 mm) fall prey to P recluzianus. Occasionally O. biplicata exhibits strong escape responses upon coming in contact with Polinices (see below). Other gastropods may prey on Olivella. Larger olivids, though absent from the area under study, feed on Olivella species in Latin America (Otsson, 1956). In the labora- tory small O. biplicata are drilled (Plate 51, Figure 3) and eaten by Acanthina spirata (BLAINVILLE, 1832) (FoTHERINGHAM, 1966). These two species do not nor- mally occur together in the field, A. spirata preferring rocky shores; but at more exposed sites Olivella are most abundant on sand near rocks and pilings where predators from solid substrates could attack them. Jaton festivus (Hinps, 1844), Nassarius fossatus (Goutp, 1849), and the opisthobranch Navanax inermis (Cooprr, 1862) co- occur with O. biplicata and may eat it. No Jaton bore holes have been found in Olivella shells, however, and Nassarwus is mainly a scavenger. Navanax proved unres- ponsive to Olivella in the field (Edwards) and in the laboratory (Paine, 1963), and O. biplicata is not found in Navanax fecal pellets (PatneE, op. cit.). FoTHERINGHAM (1966) has noted a distinctive bore hole on the columella of Olivella (Plate 51, Figure 4) and other gastropod shells. These shells were occupied by hermit crabs and were collected from rocky intertidal sites in the San Diego area. I have not found this marking on the shells of living Olivella or on hermit crab shells collected from subtidal sand bottom. The bore hole re- sembles those of gastropods, but may be made by a barnacle (Tomuinson, 1953) or a flatworm (WoELKE, 1961). The much higher incidence of the bore holes in worn, encrusted “old” shells than in clean, “new” shells, though, suggests a non-predatory agent (Fotheringham, personal communication). Asteroids commonly prey upon gastropods, and at least two eat Olivella biplicata. Pisaster brevispinus was occa- sionally observed taking these snails on the northern Cali- fornia and Oregon coasts. At Duxbury Reef (37°54’N Latitude), the only site where the two species co-occurred abundantly at low tide, ca. 40 seastars were examined; only one was feeding, taking an Olivella (22.7 mm) whose shell lip was damaged, possibly by a crab. These two species also live together near extreme low tide at Monterey Harbor and subtidally off North Spit at Coos Bay. Olivella biplicata shows a species-specific avoidance response to this seastar (see below). The second asteroid predator on Olivella biplicata, Astropecten armatus, is more specialized for sand bottom life. The two species are commonly taken together in Page 328 southern California and Baja California, usually subtidally (Scripps Pier) but occasionally intertidally (Estero de Punta Banda, below Ensenada, Baja California). The feeding sequence was observed in an aquarium provided with fresh sand and running seawater. The seastar, ap- parently using distance chemoreception, quickly “runs” to and over an O. biplicata placed nearby and begins forcing its arms into the sand around the prey. While burying its arms, the seastar may shift laterally in the direction the snail was moving, or it may appear to carry or push the prey for a distance. Astropecten does not extrude its stomach but swallows prey whole. Even the largest O. biplicata do not gain safety through their size or strength: a 29.0 mm snail was readily taken and completely ingested in just over 2 minutes. During in- gestion the predator’s central disc may swell aborally and prey Olivella shells can be felt inside. Intraoral di- gestion may be an adjustment to life in sand or to the loss of suckers on the podia, or both; in any case, external examinations in the field will fail to reveal the foods of Astropecten. Although the shell of the 29.0mm Ol- vella was still inside the seastar 23 hours after ingestion, in several aquarium trials an initially unfed Astropecten regularly ate > 1 adult snail per day over 4 - 5 days; and MacGinitre & MacGinitic (1949) report 3 or 4 snails (species unspecified) may be found at one time in an Astropecten. Clearly Astropecten armatus, to which O. biplicata shows no definite escape response (see below), could be an important predator upon O. biplicata. Various crabs eat snails, either by cracking them open or by pulling them from their shells (see SHoup, 1968, for references). Small Cancer magister DANA, 1852, which co- occurred with Olivella biplicata on several beaches in Oregon, ate live, though possibly moribund, O. biplicata in the laboratory. The crab held the snail with the legs of one side of its body, while reaching deeply into the shell aperture with the opposite cheliped. Considerable in- direct field evidence — shells broken into many pieces (sometimes with all the fragments lying within a few square centimeters), empty shells with the body whorl alone broken away (Plate 51, Figure 5), occupied and empty shells with the lip broken back, and rare moribund snails with both the shell lip broken away and the foot torn raggedly -— indicates crab predation on O. biplica- ta. Suspects include adult Portunus xantusu (Stimpson, 1862), Cancer antennarius Stimpson, 1856, and Cancer magister, all of which have been taken with O. biplicata. Exsuine et al. (1964) found Carcinus maenas LINNAEUS, 1758, Portunus puber (Linnaeus, 1767) and Cancer pa- gurus LINNAEUS, 1758, when kept in cages in the field with Nucella lapillus (LinNAEus, 1758) (similar size range as Olivella), smashed and ate the snails as well as THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 removed others from their shells. Further, Portunus puber observed in the laboratory, used its master chelae to break away the body whorl of Nucella, producing shell damage like that observed in Olivella shells (Plate 51, Figure 5). Similarly, Kon (1959) found xanthid crabs attacked Conus in the laboratory, breaking the outer lip of the snail’s shells. These crabs never killed snails, though, probably because the latter could retreat into older, thicker portions of the shell. Clearly, then, crabs can and do produce the type of shell damage observed in Olivella shells. Among vertebrates, gulls and other shore birds regular- ly forage in the sand at low tide, taking snails and other forms. Olivella is eaten by shore birds in northern Peru (Korpcke & Korprcxe, 1952), and Stohler (personal com- munication) and I have observed gulls taking O. biplicata in California and Oregon, respectively. The gulls, probing irregularities in the sand, sometimes throw the snails out on the surface, and then overlook their find. All along the Pacific coast small Olivella shells can occasionally be found in the droppings of shore birds’. With the rising tide, on the other hand, fish, which are major predators on snails in some areas, move in large numbers over Olwvella-rich sand flats and may well prey upon the snails, but this has not been observed. Purple dye substances irritating to fish are known for some olive shells (AsgorrT, 1954). Probably the most important depredator on Olwella biplicata in accessible localities is man. Humans do not eat olive snails on our Pacific Coast, though they do in Brazil, where one species is locally called “vitela” (veal) or “vaquinha”’ (little cow) (Marcus & Marcus, 1959), and in Peru (Oxsson, 1956). Olwwella biplicata shells were extensively traded by the American Indians, who used them as jewelry and money (STEARNS, 1889; HEN- DERSON, 1930; Batty, 1935; Girrorp & Girrorp, 1942; and Appott, 1954). Today the animals are collected in great numbers simply for the beauty of their shells. Shell dealers take them for sale at tourist stands across the country; some shells are made into earrings. A few West Coast residents also use Olivella to “decorate” furniture and to construct “artistic” shell mosaics. The protective shell has caused heavy losses for O. biplicata. Thus, at low tide, Olivella biplicata are attacked by shore birds, especially gulls, and man; and, as the tide rises, they are preyed upon by seastars, octopuses, at least two species of gastropods, and probably by crabs and fish as well. 2 REEDER (1951) also found Olivella in the stomach of a Marbled Godwit, Limosa fedoa, in southern California. Vol. 11; No. 4 SPECIES-SPECIFIC PREDATOR AVOIDANCE RESPONSE Various marine gastropods show specific escape reactions to predatory seastars and gastropods. The literature has been reviewed regularly (BuLLocK, 1953; Passano, 1957; Koun, 1961; Feper, 1963, 1967; Marcouin, 1964a; FE- DER & CHRISTENSEN, 1966). Further work is available on herbivorous gastropods responding at a distance to camivorous ones (see KoHN & WATERS, 1966, and refer- ences therein). The escape responses generally consist of rapid movement (“running,” “galloping”) away from the predator, sometimes with the shell being violently swung about, and occasionally accomplished by means of curious “leaping”; some naticids, Haliotis rufescens SwaInson, 1822, and Diodora aspera (ESCHSCHOLTZ, 1833) extend a fold of the foot or mantle over their shells, preventing seastar tube foot adhesion (Marco.in, 1964a; Montcomery, 1967). The stimulus is chemical and apparently emanates from the external epithelium of the predator, especially from the epidermis of tube feet (FEDER & Lasker, 1964). Contact with a single tube foot elicits vigorous escape reactions. Effective stimulation also occurs through distance chemoreception of whole animals and extracts. Tests of escape responses in Olivella biplicata consisted of touching the snail’s foot (propodium and parapodia) with isolated and intact tube feet from the seastars Pis- aster ochraceus, P. brevispinus, and Astropecten armatus, as well as observing outcomes of contacts between whole animals. Controls consisted of similarly touching snails with a blunt probe or a glass rod. Olivella biplicata ex- hibited a vigorous avoidance response to contacts with P brevispinus tube feet, but no greater reaction to P ochra- ceus and A. armatus than to control treatments. The snails failed to give strong responses to contacts with the aboral surfaces of any of the three seastar species. The minimum escape reaction of Olivella biplicata consists of a sharp turning away from the point of contact with Pisaster brevispinus or one of its tube feet, followed by top-speed crawling. More often upon contact O. bipli- cata rears up on the hind portion of its foot, withdrawing the propodium and throwing the parapodia forward; this response frequently flips the snails over backwards in a reverse half-somersault. In the extreme form of the response the animal, after throwing itself on its back, pumps the expanded metapodium up-and-down violently, lifting the snail from the substrate and carrying it away some 5 - 10 cm in a form of upside-down swimming. This metapodial swimming response is qualitatively distinct from any previously reported gastropod escape behavior. It is effected by holding the parapodia close to the sides THE VELIGER Page 329 of the shell, especially at the anterior end, so the vigorous down beats of the large, horizontally extended metapod- ium force water down and back, lifting the gastropod and propelling it forward. After each of the more energetic responses the snails quickly right themselves and rapidly crawl a short way (ca. 8 - 12 cm) before resuming a nor- mal pace. Escape movements, while carrying the animals away from the point of first contact with a whole seastar, may carry them up against another ray of the predator; in this case the avoidance reaction is repeated. Initially Olivella biplicata gave no noticeable response to Polinices recluzianus in feeding trials, even crawling over the predator’s propodia without reaction. Later in the trials, however, Olivella occasionally gave violent avoidance responses to contacts with Polinices, including the “swimming” response. Whether experience with the predator accounts for the appearance of the sporadic escape behavior is not known. Olivella also forces its way from the grasp of Polinices as described above. Pisaster ochraceus is abundant on rocks and pilings pro- jecting from beaches, but only occasionally ventures onto the sand; whereas, P brevispinus, the species Olivella bi- plicata avoids, is a natural neighbor of and predator on Olivella (see above). Thus, the escape reaction is only elicited by the species of Pisaster that O. biplicata is likely to meet in the field, and the response appears to have direct survival value in carrying the snail away from a known predator. Astropecten armatus, on the other hand, lives with and eats O. biplicata, but elicits no defi- nite avoidance response from it. Qualitative observations indicate Astropecten moves so quickly over sand that escape efforts by O. biplicata, including the “swimming” response with its slow start, would be futile and could not be selected for. Several Astropecten species can crawl 10mm/sec (FEDER & CHRISTENSEN, 1966), which ex- ceeds all but the fastest escape responses of gastropods (KoHn & Waters, 1966). Animals exhibiting avoidance responses show varying abilities to discriminate between possible predators. Two highly specific responses are pertinent to the case of Oli- vella. Appropriately for its rocky intertidal habitat and vulnerabilities, Acmaea pelta EScHSCHOLTZ, 1833, shows a “running” escape response to Pisaster ochraceus, but not to PR brevispinus (Marcotin, 1964b) -— the opposite reactions from those of O. biplicata. In contrast, Dendr- aster excentricus ESCHSCHOLTZ, 1831, responds like Oli- vella, avoiding the predatory P brevispinus by burrowing into the sand, while ignoring Astropecten armatus (Mac- Ginrrie & MacGinitte, 1949), even though the latter commonly feeds on sand dollars (E. W. Fager, personal communication). These differing responses could be used as bioassays in isolating the specific chemicals eliciting Page 330 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 avoidance reactions. Whether animals of the various taxa respond to the same or different chemicals is a question of particular interest; representatives of different phyla do respond to certain seastar extracts (FEDER & ARVIDSSON, 1967), and the substances in extracts of different seastars show chemical similarities (Mack et al., 1968). Gonor (1966), from a consideration of the escape responses of various prosobranchs, suggests these behavior patterns were not evolved de novo, but developed from pre-existing locomotory and righting mechanisms. In the case of Olivella biplicata the minimum avoidance res- ponse of rapid crawling does, but the more vigorous responses do not, appear to agree with this view. The “rearing” and “swimming” escape behavior has, however, other uses than predator avoidance: it is seen when, under conditions of crowding, one olive is bitten by an- other, or when a snail is placed in an alien environment, e. g., a plastic bag. The truly striking thing about Olivella is the dexterity and versatility with which it uses its foot — in locomotion, burrowing, handling of live prey, and in reproductive behavior. Perhaps a more intriguing, and resolvable, aspect of the development of avoidance responses concerns not the movements themselves but the acquisition of, and sensory mechanisms used in, the dis- crimination of substances from predators. Various investigators have seen gastropod avoidance behavior succeed in permitting at least some individuals to escape predators (see FEDER, 1967; Marco in, 1964a). Feper (1963) found that snails exhibiting escape respon- ses to Pisaster ochraceus were not fed upon in proportion to their abundance and availability, whereas mussels and barnacles were; the non-responding Acmaea scabra (GouLtp, 1846), on the other hand, ranks high on the seastar’s food list even though few live within the latter’s range. The apparent rarity of captures of Olivella bipli- cata by Pisaster brevispinus, despite the abundance of both, was noted earlier. Defensive escape reactions, even if effective in only a limited percentage of predator con- tacts, would be of selective advantage to gastropods. In- deed, that these behavior patterns have evolved demon- strates both their adaptive value and, in turn, the effectiveness of asteroids as predators. POPULATIONAL EFFECTS or PREDATION The significance of predation for Olivella biplicata populations can only be speculatively evaluated since available information is fragmentary. Probably larvac and newly metamorphosed young, vulnerable to a wider and different array of predators than adults and to fluctuations in physical factors as well, suffer heavy losses, though the evidence is circumstantial. Size frequency distributions obtained through quantitative sampling of natural populations at Coos Bay, Oregon, Yaquina Bay, Oregon, and Duxbury Reef, California (Edwards, unpubl.) show that, while new young are occasionally abundant, proportionally few reach reproductive size (over 16 mm). Olivella populations are often primarily composed of larger, slow-growing animals, which may live 10 years or more (P. W. Frank and D. C. Edwards, unpubl.; Storer, 1962, and personal communication). Yet, despite a po- tentially lengthy reproductive life during which increasing numbers of progeny are likely produced each year, even a medium-sized Olivella female (20.6mm) produced 4 236 eggs in a single spawning period (Epwarps, 1968). Also the species reproduces year-round (EDWARDS, op. cit.). Thus many young are spawned for even the low, though continuous, population turnover indicated. Numerous sus- pension feeders and small predators could, of course, take heavy tolls on the bottom-swimming larvae (Epwarps, op.cit.) and newly settled young. In some species the escape responses of smaller animals to seastars are less successful than those of larger individuals (FEDER, 1967). Gulls and Conus also take small, immature Olivella (see above). Although a variety of predators has been shown to attack adult Olivella biplicata, several factors mitigate their populational effects. First, the snails may evade predators. A species-specific avoidance response to Pisas- ter brevispinus was detailed above, and escape reactions to Polinices recluzianus were noted. In addition, larger Olivella, which live higher on the shore, tend to remain buried during bright light conditions (EpDwarps, 1965) ; and this behavior may aid in the avoidance of visual pred- Explanation of Plate 51 Figure 1: Olivella biplicata shell (11mm) bored by Octopus sp. (photograph by Ron Lam) Figure 2: Olivella biplicata shell (22mm) bored by Polinices re- cluzianus (photograph by Ron Lam) Figure 3: Olivella biplicata shell (8mm) bored by Acanthina spirata (photograph by Ron Lam) Figure 4: Olivella biplicata shell (15mm) with bore hole of un- known origin (photograph by Ron Lam) Figure 5: Olivella biplicata shells (ca. 25mm) with the body whorl broken back, possibly by crabs John W. Evans) (photograph by THE VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 4 [Epwarps] Plate 51 i Figure 4 Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Page 331 ators. Second, not all the predators attack O. biplicata in any given locality, e. g., Conus californicus and Astro- pecten armatus occur only in southern California, whereas Cancer magister and Pisaster brevispinus are more north- erly species. Further, in the temperate latitudes under consideration predator food choices may vary seasonally and feeding may cease altogether in winter. But likely the main factor reducing predation on adults is their size: they have simply grown too large to be taken by small carnivores, e. g., various worms. Indeed the larger snails themselves prey on polychaetes (Edwards, unpubl.) . Nonetheless, Polinices, Astropecten, and Octopus eat even the largest Olivella. Since empty Olivella shells of different sizes probably do not disintegrate at very different rates, an unbiased collection of such shells would provide information on both size specific mortality rates and predation rates for predators that leave distinctive marks. Empty shells are always rare on Olivella beaches, so hermit crabs, Holo- pagurus pilosus Homes, 1900, were employed as collect- ors. (A difficulty here is that bored shells, which should afford less protection, may be selected against by the crabs.) E. W. Fager kindly provided me with an arbitrary sample of 130 O. biplicata shells from a large hermit ‘crab aggregation in 18 feet of water at Scripps Pier. The size-frequency distribution of the shells (Text figure 1) shows a sharp decline in the abundance of larger ones: only 12 shells (9%) were of adult size (>16mm). Although the size structure of the La Jolla population is not known, the shell data suggest relatively high mortali- ty among immature snails, but very low mortality among adults. Only 10 (7.7%) of the 130 Olivella shells gave 30 | fy | fo} — LL 20 22 6 8 10 I 14 16 18 Shell Length (mm) ix) fo) Number of Shells 3 a uo Figure 1 Size-frequency distribution of 130 Olivella biplicata shells from a Holopagurus pilosus aggregation at Scripps Pier evidences of particular predators: 4 had Polinices bore holes, 4 had broken shell lips indicative of crab attacks, and 2 bore possible Octopus drill holes. Possibly Polinices and Octopus prefer larger prey, as half their marks fell among the few adult shells. With the possible exception of man’s destruction of snails in some localities, predation on adults is apparently not important in the regulation of Olivella biplicata pop- ulations, though losses among the more vulnerable young may well be crucial. In nearly 3 years of observations that included diving, only a few scattered cases of preda- tion were observed. Neither is food availability likely limiting in this gregarious, omnivorous species (Edwards, unpubl. ), at least not until great densities (> 130 per m? on bay beaches, over 700 per m? in lagoons) are attained, and here again the stress falls primarily on the very young (Epwarps, 1965). Olivella biplicata populations are often heavily infected with parasitic trematodes (STEINMETZ, 1951; Duerr, 1965; Epwarps, 1968; Ivan Pratt, personal communication), and well over 50% of adults may be unsexed by the infections (Epwarps, 1968). Parasitic disease definitely reduces natality and could limit popula- tion sizes. Sporadic “disasters” may also kill many Oli- vella. Exceptional fresh water flooding and silting took heavy tolls in the San Diego Flood Control Channel in November, 1965; and similar threats arise periodically on the northern coast. Storms and winter sea turbulence — also tidal waves like that from the 1964 Alaska earth- quake — produce shifts of beach sand, posing dangers of deep burial and transport out of suitable habitat. Whole beaches may be carried away in winter, and one storm (October, 1963) deposited 1-2m of new sand on a Coos Bay, Oregon, beach, markedly reducing O. biplicata densities (Epwarps, 1965). These erratic upsets eliminate snails, but probably occur too rarely and unpredictably to regulate densities or to account for the regular size- frequency structure of most Olivella populations. The size (age) structure in Olivella populations, charac- terized by a preponderance of adults, probably results from high mortality among juveniles (and possibly re- duced adult fecundities in parasitized populations) and excellent survivorship and individual longevity among adults; turnover of the breeding population is likely limited. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to thank Drs. Peter W. Frank and E. W. Fager for making available facilities for these studies at the Oregon Institute of Marine Biology and Scripps Institution of Oceanography, respectively. I am also indebted to Mr. Page 332 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 Nick Fotheringham and Drs. E. W. Fager and Robert T. Paine for contributing useful information and to Drs. Alan J. Kohn, Peter W. Frank, and Howard M. Feder for critical comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by National Science Foundation Predoctoral and Postdoctoral Fellowships. LITERATURE CITED AxssBott, Ropert TUCKER 1954. | American seashells. Princeton, New Jersey. D. van Nostrand Co., Inc.; xiv + 541 pp.; 100 figs.; 40 plts. Barty, JosHuA LoNGsTRETH, Jr. 1935. The first Pacific conchologist. Nautilus 48 (3) : 73-75 Buttock, THEopoRE HoLMEs 1953. Predator recognition and escape responses of some intertidal gastropods in presence of starfish. Behaviour 5 (2): 130-140 DueErr, FREDERICK G. 1965. Survey of digenetic trematode parasitism in some proso- branch gastropods of the Cape Arago region, Oregon. The Veliger 8 (1): 42 (1 July 1965) Esuinc, F J., J. A. Kircuinc, L. Muntz « C. M.Taytor 1964. | The ecology of Lough Ine. XIII. Experimental observa- tions of the destruction of Mytilus edulis and Nucella lapillus by crabs. Journ. Anim. Ecol. 33: 73 - 82 Epwarps, DaLias Craic 1965. Distribution patterns within natural populations of Olivella biplicata, their underlying behavioral mechanisms, and their ecological significance. Univ. of Chicago Ph.D. Thesis. And: Bull. Ecol. Soc. Amer. 46: 168 1968. Reproduction in Olivella biplicata. 10 (4): 297 - 304; plt. 44; 3 text figs. FeperR, Howarp MITCHELL 1963. | Gastropod defensive responses and their effectiveness Ecology 44 (3): 505 The Veliger (1 April 1968) in reducing predation by starfishes. to 512; 2 figs. 1967. | Organisms responsive to predatory seastars. Sarsia 29: 371 - 394 FEDER, Howarp M. « J. ARviDSSON 1967. Studies on a sea-star (Marthasterias glacialis) extract responsible for avoidance reactions in a gastropod (Buccinum undatum) . Ark. Zool. 19: 369 - 379 FEDER, Howarp MiTcHELL & AAGE M@LLER CHRISTENSEN 1966. Aspects of asteroid biology. pp. 87-127 In: Physio- logy of Echinodermata, RicHarp A. Bootootian (ed.). Intersci. Publ. (Wiley), New York. FepER, Howarp M. « RuBEN LASKER 1964. Partial purification of a substance from starfish tube feet which elicits escape responses in gastropod molluscs. Life Sciences 3 (9): 1047 - 1051 FoTrHERINGHAM, Nick 1966. An analysis of predation on gastropods. Unpubl. student reprt. in Adv. Invert. Zool., Scripps Institution of Oceanography FRETTER, VERA & ALASTAIR GRAHAM 1962. _ British prosobranch molluscs, their functional anatomy and ecology. London, Ray Soc. xvi+/755 pp.; 316 figs. GirrorD, DELiLa Sara GirFEN & Epwarp WINSLow GIFFORD 1942. Olivella pycna. Nautilus 55 (3): 92-93 Gonor, JEFFERSON JoHN 1965. Predator-prey reactions between two marine prosobranch gastropods. The Veliger 7 (4): 228-232 (1 April 1965) 1966. | Escape responses of North Borneo strombid gastropods elicited by the predatory prosobranchs Aulica vespertilio and Conus marmoreus. The Veliger 8 (4): 226 - 230 (1 April 1966) HENDERSON, JUNIUS 1930. Ancient shell “trade routes”. 109 - 110 Koepcke, H. W. & M. KoErckE 1952. Sobre el proceso de transformacion de la materia or- ganica en las playas arenosas del Peru. Rev. Cienc. Univ. Nac. San Marcos 54 (479-480): 5-29 (also as Publ. Mus. Hist. Nat. “Javier Prado”, Ser. A, Zool., no. 8: 1-25) Koun, ALAN JACOBS 1959. The ecology of Conus in Hawaii. 29: 47 - 90. 1961. | Chemoreception in gastropod molluscs. 1: 291 - 308. 1966. Food specialization in Conus in Hawaii and California. Ecology 47: 1041 - 1043 Koun, ALAN JAcoBS & VIRGINIA WATERS 1966. | Escape responses of three herbivorous gastropods to the predatory gastropod Conus textile. Anim. Behav. 14: 340 - 345 MacGiniTiE, Grorce Esper & Nettie MacGIniTIE Nautilus 43 (4): Ecol. Monogr. Am. Zool. 1949. Natural history of marine animals. McGraw- Hill, New York, xii+473 pp.; 282 text figs. Mackig, A. M., REUBEN LASKER & P. T. GRANT 1968. Avoidance reactions of a mollusc Buccinum undatum to saponin-like surface-active substances in extracts of the star- fish Asterias rubens and Marthasterias glacialis. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 26: 415 - 428 Marcus, EvALINE & Ernst Marcus 1959, Studies on Olividae. Bol. Fac. Filos. Cienc. S. Paulo, Zool. 22: 99 - 188 : Marco tin, ABE S. 1964a. The mantle response of Diodora aspera. Animal Behavior 12 (1): 187 - 194 1964b. A running response of Acmaea to seastars. Ecology 45 (1): 191 - 193 Montcomery, Davin H. 1967. Responses of two haliotid gastropods (Mollusca), Hali- otis assimilis and Haliotis rufescens, to the forcipulate asteroids (Echinodermata) , Pycnopodia helianthoides and Pisaster ochra- ceus. The Veliger 9 (4) : 359 - 368; plts. 50, 51; 2 text figs. (1 April 1967) Oxsson, AXEL ADOLF 1956. Studies on the genus Olivella. Philadelphia 108: 155 - 225 Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Page 333 EN TE eee eee ee —_— Paine, RoBertT TREAT 1963. Food recognition and predation on opisthobranchs by Navanax inermis (Gastropoda: Opisthobranchia). The Veliger 6(1): 1-9; plt. 1; 1 text fig. (i July 1963) Passano, Leonarp Maccruper, III 1957. Prey-predator recognition in the lower invertebrates. pp. 37-47 In: Recent advances in invertebrate physiology, Brap.ey T. ScHEER (ed.). Univ. Oregon, Eugene. Prtson, MicHaEL EpwaArD QUINTON & PETER BERKLEY TAYLOR 1961. Hole drilling by octopus. Science 134: 1366 - 1368 REEDER, WILLIAM G. 1951. | Stomach analysis of a group of shorebirds. 53: 43 - 45 Saunpers, PAu R. & Fay HENRY WoLFSoNn 1961. | Food and feeding behavior in Conus californicus Hinps, 1844. The Veliger 3 (3): 73-76; plt. 13 (1 Jan. 1961) SHoup, Joun B. 1968. Shell opening by crabs of the genus Calappa. Science 160: 887 - 888 STEARNS, ROBERT EDWARDS CARTER Condor 1889. | Ethno-conchology: a study of primitive money. Smithson. Inst., U.S. Nat. Mus., Rept. for 1887: 297 - 334 STEINMETZ, R. D. 1951. Group movements of Olivella biplicata at Monterey Harbor. Unpubl. student rep. Invert. Zool., Univ. Calif., Berkeley STOHLER, RUDOLF 1962. Preliminary report on growth studies in Olivella bipli- cata. The Veliger 4 (3): 150-151; plt. 36 (1 Jan. 1962) Tuorson, GUNNAR 1958. Parallel level-bottom communities, their temperature adaptation, and their “balance” between predators and food animals. pp. 67-86 In: Buzzatti-Traverso, A. A. (ed.), Perspectives in marine biology. | Univ. Calif. Press, Berkeley, California TomLInson, JAck TrisH 1953. A burrowing barnacle of the genus Trypetesa (Order Acrothoracica) . Journ. Wash. Acad. Sci. 43: 373 - 381 Turner, Harry Jackson, Jr. 1951. Fourth report on investigations of the shellfisheries of Massachusetts. Commonw. Mass., Dept. Conserv., Div. Marine Fish., pp. 3-21 (Contrib. no. 615, Woods Hole Oce- anogr. Inst.) WoELKE, CHar_Les E. 1957. The flatworm Pseudostylochus ostreophagus Hyman, a predator of oysters. Proc. Nat. Shell. Assoc. 47: 62 - 67 Page 334 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 Rediscovery of Terebra cochlea DrsHayes BY TWILA BRATCHER 8121 Mulholland Terrace, Hollywood, California 90046 (Plate 52) In 1857 DESHAYES DESCRIBED A SINGULAR and beautiful species of Terebra (T. trochlea) in the Journal de Con- chyliologie, page 89, number 24 and illustrated on plates 5 and 6. This medium large species (holotype 65 mm X 13 mm) of a soft fawn color is decorated with flammules of creamy white. The type locality was given as Zanzibar. Two specimens of the type lot from the Cuming collection are in the type collection of the British Museum (Natural History). These I examined and photographed. Deshayes also retained a specimen or specimens of the type lot in his own collection (Ecole des Mines, Paris). In 1860 REEVE published an excellent figure of this species in his Mono- graph of the genus Terebra, in the Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London (species no. 54), though his description reverses the colors and lists the shell as whitish with fawn markings. In 1885 Tryon included it in the Terebra section of the Manual of Conchology (vol. 7, p. 16; plt. 12), and in 1888 Partet included it in the “Catalog der Conchylien Sammlung” (p. 255). He also included T: cochlea DEsuHayYEs, type locality Zanzi- bar, which obviously was a misspelling for T: trochlea. For nearly a hundred years T: trochlea seems to have been dropped completely from molluscan literature, and since the type lot this species has not been reported from Zanzibar or any other locality. In July 1967 Clifton S. Weaver of Hawaii sent me for examination a specimen of Terebra which matches the holotype of 7: trochlea. This specimen was collected at Nukuhiva in the Marquesas by Richard Sixberry. At the convention of the American Malacological Union in 1968 at Corpus Christi, Texas, another specimen of this species was shown on a slide accompanying a paper by Dr. Harald Rehder of the Uniter States National Museum, though at that time the Jerebra was unidentified. This latter speci- men (U.S.N. M. no. 679155) was collected by Richard Sixberry also at a depth of 20 feet in muddy sand at Taiohae Bay, Nukuhiva, Marquesas. The specimen is 65.3 mm X 12.8mm. Though it is possible that this species occurs in the Zanzibar area, one must assume that, like many other species of Terebra described in early literature, the type locality is erroneous unless other specimens are reported from that area. Description of the shell: Shell medium large; color fawn to light reddish brown with flammules of creamy white; whorls slightly convex and turreted, shouldered anterior to prominent convex subsutural band which is set off by well defined suture and broad, deeply impressed subsu- tural groove which is microscopically punctate in the early whorls; sculpture of early whorls of indistinct axial grooves and obsolete flat axial ribs which form small nodes at their posterior endings on both whorl and sub- sutural band; in later whorls axial grooves become nu- merous fine axial striations, but nodes continue to occur anterior to suture and subsutural groove; body whorl of medium length; aperture ovate; outer lip thin with color pattern showing through; columella white, heavy, quite straight; siphonal fasciole well defined, striate, set off by a sharp keel; anterior canal very broad, short, recurved. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to thank Dr. Harald A. Rehder of the Smithsonian Institution for the loan of the specimen of Terebra troch- lea DesuHayeEs for study and photography. I also wish to thank Clifton S. Weaver for sending for my examination the specimen which brought this species to my attention. Explanation of Plate 52 Terebra trochlea DESHAYES, 1857 Figure 1: Holotype and paratype, British Museum (Natural His- tory) ; holotype on left. Figures 2, 3, 4: Specimen no. 679155, in the United States Na- tional Museum. THE VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 4 [BRATCHER] Plate 52 Figure 2 mV) ” ‘ Figure 3 Figure 4 photographs by Twita BRaATCHER Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Page 335 LITERATURE CITED DesHAYES, GERARD PAUL 1857. | Descriptions d’espéces nouvelles du genre Terebra. Journ. de Conchyl. 6: 65 - 102; plts. 3-5 PAETEL, FRIEDRICH 1875. Die bisher veréffentlichten Familien- und Gattungs- Namen der Mollusken. Berlin (Paetel) pp. i- iv+1 - 229 1888. Mit Hinzufiigung der bis jetzt publicierten Recenten Arten, sowie der ermittelten Synonyma; Fam. Terebridae: pp. 247 - 255 REEvE, LovELL AuGUSsTUS 1860. | Conchologia Iconica. Monograph of the genus Terebra. 12: plts. 1-27; species 1-155; a descriptive letter press plus index 13: plts. 1 - 27 (May - June 1860) Tryon, GEorcE WASHINGTON, Jr. 1885. | Manual of Conchology. Monograph of the family Te- rebridae. 7: 1-64; plts. 1-12. Philadelphia Page 336 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 Growth Characteristics of Acmaea persona EscHSCHOLTZ' RON KENNY Zoology Department, University College of Townsville, Queensland, Australia Marine Science Center, Oregon State University, Newport, Oregon 97365 (4 Text figures) WILBuR & Owen (1964) HAVE REVIEWED the literature on growth studies of mollusks and Frank (1965a, 1965b) has discussed some aspects of growth for 3 species of Acmaea on the Pacific coast of North America. Acmaea persona ESCHSCHOLTZ, 1833 has a geograph- ic range from latitude 37°N to latitude 60°N on the Pacific coast of North America (FrircHMan, 1962). The vertical range of the species in the intertidal zone ex- tends approximately from mean sea level to mean higher high water. Characteristically this limpet is found in ' Supported by U.S. Office of Naval Research, Project Number NR 104-936, “Marine Ecological Studies.” areas sheltered from the heaviest wave action, such as the heads of small bays (KENNy, in MS). The specimens used in this study were collected at Boiler Bay and Yaquina Head near Newport, Oregon (lat. 44° N; long. 124° W) during the summer of 1967. During the collecting period temperatures in the area ranged from 10° to 23° C (air), 8.5° to 16°C (sea), and 10.5° to 31°C (rock surface). January sea temperatures for the area range between 7.7° and 10.3°C (Wyatt, STILL & Haac, 1965) and the mean range of air tem- peratures for January is 3.4° to 9.7°C (U.S. Weather Bureau records). No particular selection was exercised in collecting these limpets, but as the collections were made initially for physiological experiments, they are representative of size range rather than truly random collections. One hundred and eighty-nine limpets were collected and the analysis of annual growth rings is based on records from 166 individuals in which the rings were considered not to have been affected by erosion. Allometric growth data are based on measurements of approximately 100 limpets. Measurements were taken of shell length, breadth and height (mm), shell weight (gm) and tissue weight (gm) Figure 1 Dorsal and lateral views of Acmaea persona, length 44.4mm, Vol. 11; No. 4 after removal from the shell and surface drying with paper towelling. Shell volume (ml) was measured with distilled water containing liquid detergent, from gradu- ated pipettes. In analysis and graphical presentation all measure- ments have been related to shell length. The step-like ridges on the shell surface are caused by differences in the rate of shell formation. As the result of observations in the field on a small number of marked animals, Dr. P. W. Frank has stated (personal communi- cation) that these ridges are annual growth rings formed in winter (Figure 1). Further, within each annual step, fine, regularly arranged, secondary rings may be seen under magnification. The measurements of shell length have been arranged in classes on the basis of number of annual rings and the size frequencies for these classes are shown in Figure 2. As the shell edge must be presumed to be forming part of the next annual ring, the age of the limpet is the annu- al ring number of years plus part of a year. The number of animals in the 0 ring class is too small to warrant detailed analysis, but the samples for other classes show a mean annual increase in shell length of 6 mm in the second year, 4 mm in the third year, 4 mm in the fourth year, and 3 mm in the fifth year. Shell Length in mm O I II III IV Vv VI Ring Class Figure 2 Frequency distribution of shell length related to number of annual showing annual rings; drawn from glass tracings. rings, for Acmaea persona. As the largest specimen collected was 44.4mm in length, it is probable that the life span is considerably longer than 6 years. THE VELIGER Page 337 Counts of the number of secondary rings occurring on the surface of an annual growth area (both summer and winter sections of the step) were made from 55 individu- als, with no surface erosion, ranging in shell length from 25.3 mm to 35.8 mm and showing 2, 3, or 4 annual rings. In each case the count was made on the area one step in from the shell edge, i. e. irrespective of age, for the same period of time. The number of rings recorded varied from 114 to 201 with a mean of 149. The allometric patterns of growth for various shell dimensions and for the soft tissues are shown in Figures 3 and 4. Growth equations for these relationships are listed below, where L is shell length in mm, B is shell breadth in mm, H is shell height in mm, V is shell volume in ml, W is shell weight in gm, and wt is tissue weight in gm. B= 0.85 L- 1.2 log V = 3.27 (log L) — 4.4 log wt = 4(log L) —5.7 30 A 25 20 mls : gms 15 xe 15 20 25 30 35 40 Shell Length in mm Figure 3 Relationship between shell length and shell breadth (A) and shell height (B), for Acmaea persona. The relationships of shell height and shell weight to shell length are more complex and neither growth pattern can be described readily by a single mathematical formula throughout the range of shell lengths. The shell weight relationship can be expressed as two equations, one for small shells and a second for larger specimens, with the change of form taking place at lengths between 25 and 28 mm. Page 338 log W = 2.7 (log L) — 3.9 (small shells) log W —5 (log L) —7.2 (large shells) Similarly the shell height to length equation, log H = (log L) —0.6 : gms mls 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Shell Length in mm Figure 4 Relationship between shell length and shell volume (A), shell weight (B), and tissue weight (C), for Acmaea persona. The vertical scale represents millilitres for the shell volume graph, and milligrams for the shell weight and tissue weight graphs. applies only to small shells and for shells longer than 25 mm, a single formula cannot be derived. Frank (1965a, 1965b), commenting on other species of Acmaea (A. pelta EscuscHo.tz, 1833, A. digitalis EscuscHo tz, 1833, A. paradigitalis FrircHMan, 1960), has noted that due to the wide size range in any age class, size alone does not permit an estimate of either age or longevity. A similar statement would apply to A. persona. Hyman (1967) has combined the results of studies on Patella vulgata LinnaEus, 1758 from English coasts by RussELL & Orton to give size ranges for age classes of that species. Calculations from these data show P. vulgata having a 50% increase in length in the second year and a 28% increase in the third year, compared with corre- sponding figures of 36% and 16% for Acmaea persona. The suggested probable life span of more than 6 years is similar to the “5 to 16 years” listed for Patella vulgata by Hyman (op. cit.). Comrort (1957) gives 15 years as the life span for Acmaea dorsuosa Gou.tp, 1859 and Darsy (1964) discussing a gastropod from the Oregon THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 coast, Tegula funebralis (A. ApaMs, 1855), mentions individual specimens estimated to be 12 and 30 years old. The graphs for length-breadth and length-height rela- tionships are similar in form to those presented by HAMAI (1937) for Patelloida grata (GouLp, 1859). The increase in height of the shell in older specimens of Acmaea per- sona can be related to the change of direction of shell growth in older animals (see lateral view, Figure 1). “Ledging” ‘has been reported by Moore (1934) in Patella vulgata. Moore described this as a “temporary change in the angle of shell growth” and considered it to be due to slowing of shell formation during the winter. As noted above, FRANK has suggested a similar explana- tion for the formation of annual rings in Acmaea persona shells. From the available data the overall winter range of environmental temperatures for Acmaea persona is 3.4° to 10.3° C and the overall summer range 8.5° to 31° C. WILBUR & Owen (1964) cite several studies showing direct relationships between growth rate of mollusks and environmental temperature. It seems probable that the annual differences in rate of shell growth in Acmaea per- gona are primarily related to seasonal differences in en- vironmental temperatures in the intertidal zone. The number of secondary rings developed in an annual growth area suggests the number of short term active growth periods in one year. The wide range recorded for Acmaea persona shows considerable individual variability in number of short term growth periods per annum. For an intertidal species, such as A. persona, this variability is probably influenced by several environmental factors (microclimate, tidal patterns, and wave action) as well as by physiological factors. ACKNOWLEDGMENT The author wishes to thank Dr. Joel W. Hedgpeth for the laboratory accommodation and facilities made avail- able at the Oregon State University, Marine Science Center, Newport. LITERATURE CITED Comrort, ALEXANDER 1957. ‘The duration of life in molluscs. London 52: 219 - 241 Darsy, Ricuarp L. 1964. | On growth and longevity in Tegula funebralis (Mollus- ca: Gastropoda). The Veliger 6, Supplement: 6 - 7; pit. 1. (15 November 1964) Frank, PETER WOLFGANG 1965a. Growth of three species of Acmaea. 7 (3): 201 - 202; 1 fig.; 1 table 1965b. Ecology 46 (6) : Proc. Malacol. Soc. The Veliger (1 January 1965) 831 - 844; 8 figs.; 6 tables The biodemography of an intertidal snail population. — Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Page 339 FRITCHMAN, Harry K.., II 1962. A study of the reproductive cycle in the California Acmaeidae (Gastropoda). Part IV. The Veliger 4 (3): 134 to 140; plts. 30 - 32 (1 January 1962) Hamat, I. 1937. | Some notes on relative growth, with special reference to the growth of limpets. Sci. Repts. Tohoku Univ., 4" ser., 12: 71-95 Hyman, Lipsy H. 1967. Mollusca, I - vol.6 of The invertebrates. McGraw- Hill, New York Kenny, Ron P. (in MS) Ecology of the limpet genus Acmaea on the Oregon coast. Moore, Hitary Brooke 1934. On “ledging” in shells at Port Erin. Proc. Malacol. Soc. London 21: 213 - 222 Wixeur, K. M. & GARRETH OWEN 1964. Growth. In K. M. Wilbur « C. M. Yonge (ed.) Phys- iology of Mollusca. Acad. Press, New York Wyatt, B., R. Stitz, & C. Haac 1965. Surface temperature and salinity observations at Pacif- ic Northwest shore stations for 1963 and 1964. Dept. Oceanogr., Oregon State Univ., Data Rept. 21 Page 340 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 Use of the Propodium as a Swimming Organ in an Ancillid (Gastropoda : Olividae) BY BARRY R. WILSON Western Australian Museum, Perth, Western Australia (Plate 53; 1 Text figure) AMONG THE PROSOBRANCH molluscs swimming as the prime method of locomotion is confined to the pelagic Heteropoda although there are reports that several mem- bers of the families Olividae and Naticidae are capable of brief “flights” of swimming activity. p’Orpicny (1841, p. 418) observed this type of loco- motion in Oliva tehuelchana (p’Orxicny, 1841), and Oxsson (1956, p. 161) mentioned the swimming ability of species of the genus Olivella. Marcus & Marcus (1959, p. 103) reported swimming in Olivella verreauxu (Ducros, 1857). In all these cases the movement was effected by the lateral wing-like flaps of the metapodium which characteristically fold over and cover the shell in members of the Olividae. There are no details in these reports concerning the duration of the swimming activity or the circumstances in which it occurred. ZIEGELMEIER (1958) reported swimming in the Medi- terranean naticid Polinices josephinus (Risso, 1838). In this case the propodium is the propulsive organ. The animal “swims” in two positions. Most frequently it re- mains in the normal crawling position and the “whip- ping” of the propodium lifts the front end of the body off the sand and propels it forward. The posterior part of the foot remains in contact with the surface of the sand. Less commonly the animal twists into an upside-down position and the “whipping” of the propodium lifts the animal off the substrate and propels it forward a distance of 3 to 5cm (in a large animal) for each stroke. Each propodium stroke is from the horizontal position upwards, almost as far as the anterior wall of the shell, and then downwards again to the original position, and lasts be- tween 1 and 2 seconds. ZIEGELMEIER interpreted both forms of “swimming” behaviour as escape or “flight” reactions. It occurred when crawling animals were touched with a stick or when they collided with another animal. Similar behaviour by the ancillid Ancillista cingulata (SowerBy, 1830) was observed on a recent field trip in the North-West of Western Australia. A single specimen was collected in fairly coarse sand on an intertidal sand flat on the western side of Point Cloates (22° 43’S; 113° 40’ E). It was crawling beneath the surface of the sand and left a long trail, wider than those of Oliva orna- ta Marrat, 1870, which is common at the same place. The preserved body and the shell of the specimen are now in the collection of the Western Australian Museum (cat. no. 4902-68). External Anatomy of Ancillista cingulata Like other olivids, the foot of this specimen of Ancillista cingulata is divided by curved transverse grooves on both dorsal and ventral surfaces into a crescent-shaped anterior part, or propodium, and a posterior part, or metapodium. (For detailed structure of Oliva, Olivella and Olwancil- laria see Marcus & Marcus, 1959). The anterior edge of the propodium does not have a deep horizontal groove as in Oliva and Olivella but there is a deep medial longitu- dinal groove from the anterior margin to the posterior margin on the dorsal surface. At its posterior end the me- tapodium is deeply forked, a characteristic of the subfam- ily Ancillarinae (see Otsson, 1956, p. 169). The much reduced head is completely covered by the anterior ends of the lateral metapodial flaps, and is represented by only 2 small flap-like tentacles. There are no eyes. Beneath the right hand tentacle the small mouth is located. There is a very thin, elongate operculum carried on the dorsal sur- face of the metapodium medially, below the spire and concealed by the posterior ends of the lateral metapodial flaps. In the fully extended crawling position (Plate 53) the foot was greatly expanded (approximately 9cm_ long, 6cm broad) and the length of the propodium was a little less than one quarter of the total foot length, i. e. rather larger than in other olivids. The lateral flaps of the metapodium covered the body whorl of the shell, except when the animal was disturbed, but they gaped around the spire so that that part of the shell was usually Tue VELIcER, Vol. 11, No. 4 [Witson] Plate 53 A living specimen of Ancillista cingulata (SowERBY, 1830), collected at Point Cloates, Western Australia, in the fully extended crawling position. Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Page 341 visible. The siphon was carried in an oblique-erect posi- tion. The body was white, flecked with pale grey and fawn. Swimming Behavior of Ancillista cingulata The animal made no attempt to burrow into a thin cover of sand which was put in the bottom of the dish of water. Its usual method of locomotion was rapid gliding aided by secretion from the anterior edge of the propodium of a thick mucous sheet which passed over the dorsal and ventral surfaces of the body. When the animal was agitated by prods with a pencil it suddenly threw itself into a series of violent contractions which carried it to the surface of the water and around the dish in a jerky, apparently random manner, reminiscent of the random swimming movement of scallops. The pro- podium repeatedly flapped backwards from the horizon- tal plane, first dorsally and then ventrally at regular intervals of slightly more than one second. Each move- ment threw the animal forward a distance varying be- Sp Figure 1 Diagram illustrating swimming movement by beating of the propodium.in Ancillista cingulata. p = propodium; m = metapodium; sp = shell spire; s = siphon. 1. dorsal stroke; 2. intermediate position (and crawling position) ; 3. ventral stroke. tween 5 and 15 cm. The ventral beat appeared to be the most effective. Most of the time the animal remained in the normal horizontal position with the shell uppermost, but “barrel-rolls” were frequent. This activity continued for 45 seconds, during which time the propodium flapped 35 times. The animal then sank to the bottom and re- sumed its crawling activity. During the next 24 hours the same swimming response was observed several times, sometimes stimulated by agi- tation and sometimes occurring spontaneously. Each time the number of beats and the duration of the swimming period were about the same as before. Although the prog- ress of the animal was erratic and confined within the dish, it is estimated that the total distance travelled in the open water during each burst of swimming activity would be about 3 meters. The following day a thick layer of sand, an inch or so, was put in the dish and the animal buried itself and there- after remained motionless with only the siphon tip visible. When dug out and agitated, it again responded by the swimming reaction with the same duration as before. It seems most likely that this response is an escape re- action. The distance travelled and the erratic progress would allow the animal to evade most predators if this is its function. Observations on the locomotory behaviour of other ancillids which have a similarly broad propodi- um would be of interest. It is noteworthy that in the two unrelated families Naticidae and Olividae similar foot structure, i. e. division into propodium and metapodium, has been evolved independently, and that in each family at least one species has made use of the propodium as a swimming organ. SUMMARY A specimen of the ancillid Ancillista cingulata SowERBY, collected at Point Cloates, Western Australia, was ob- served to swim by dorso-ventral flapping of its broad propodium. This behaviour is interpreted as an escape reaction. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Dr D. J. G. Griffin of The Australian Museum and Miss Anne Paterson of the Western Australian Museum shared in this observation. Mrs Shirley Slack-Smith helped in the literature search for other records of swimming in prosobranchs and Mrs A. Neumann kindly translated Ziegelmeier’s paper. Page 342 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 LITERATURE CITED Marcus, EvELINE DU Bots-REYMOND & ErNstT Marcus 1959a. Studies on Olividae. Univ. Sao Paulo Fac. Filos. Cienc. e Letras. Bol. Zool. 22: 99 - 188; plts. 1 - 11 Oxtsson, AxEL ADOLF 1956. Studies on the genus Olivella. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 108: 155 - 225; plts. 8 - 16 p Orsicny, ALCIDE DESSALINES 1834-1847. Voyage dans l’Amérique Méridionale. Mollusques. Paris, vol. 5, pt. 3, xliii + 758 pp., atlas, 85 plts. [not seen] ZIEGELMEIER, E. 1958. Zur Lokomotion bei Naticiden (Gastropoda Prosobran- chia). Kurze Mitteilung uber Schwimmbewegungen bei Poly- nices josephinus Risso. Helgolander wissenschaft. Meeres- untersuch. 6: 202 - 206 Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Page 343 A New Genus and Two New Species of Typhinae from the Panamic Province (Gastropoda : Muricidae) BY HELEN DuSHANE Research Assistant, Invertebrate Zoology, Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History Los Angeles, California 90007 (Plate 54) IT SEEMS DESIRABLE to put on record the following un- described forms of Typhinae. One is of a group previously not known in the Panamic province. In Typhinae, with a world wide range of distribution from the Eocene to the Recent, it is unusual to have in one’s possession two new species to be described, one of them even requiring a new genus. Since KEEn’s (1944) revision of the Typhi- nae, new interpretations of typhine morphology have been projected by FLeminc (1962) and Vetta (1961). How- ever, until such time as workers have expressed their views in a proposed revisional work the author prefers to fol- low the outline presented by KEEN (op. cit.). Cinclidotyphis DUSHANE, gen. nov. (Plate 54, Figures 1 to 3) Varices 4 per whorl; sculpture of numerous axial riblets and fine, raised spiral cords that are continuous across the varices and interspaces; tubes folded back, not form- ing vertical ribs; cancellate sculpture distinctive and un- like that in all other species of Typhinae. Type Species: Cinclidotyphis myrae DUSHANE, spec. nov. Cinclidotyphis myrae DUSHANE, spec. nov. (Plate 54, Figures 1 to 3) Shell small, fusiform, color dingy white, protoconch white (nuclear whorl worn off in holotype), followed by 4 subsequent whorls; shoulder narrow, sloping, not deeply channeled between whorls; varices 4 per whorl, each a rounded fold which extends above shoulder to join pre- ceding varix; tubes folded back, not forming vertical ribs, each with a suture on the anterior surface which is carried horizontally onto face of succeeding varix; varices with prominent spiral and axial sculpture producing a beaded effect at the junction, about 22 spiral cords on the last whorl; every other cord at the middle of the body whorl being smaller; 18 axial ribs on the body whorl at a line with the top of the aperture; aperture oval elongate and set off by a raised margin; lip narrow and crenulated; anterior canal open, narrowing toward the base with a slight dorsal curve; operculum lacking in type. Type Material: The holotype is on deposit in the Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History, Invertebrate Zoology Type collection, catalogue number 1194. Type Locality: The holotype was collected by the author at Tenacatita Bay, Jalisco, Mexico, January 25, 1968, among rocks near a sand beach; Lat. 19°16’50” N; Long. 104°48’27” W. It is the only specimen known. Dimensions: Height 13 mm; maximum diameter 6.5 mm. Discussion: The appearance of this shell in the Panamic province is all the more remarkable because of the paucity of world wide material in the nearest related genus, Siphonochelus. The largest concentration of species of this genus occurs in the Tertiary of Europe with the earliest known species S. parisiensis (D’OrBIGNY, 1850) dating back to the Middle Eocene according to KEEN & CampBELL (1964). The genus is represented in the Aus- tralian fauna with 5 species and in the Japanese fauna with 2, but up to the present time no specimens of this genus have been reported from the Panamic province. The Mexican specimen differs from those in the genus Pterotyphis by having more than 3 tubes per whorl and in having finer sculpture. It has weak varices as in Siphonochelus, with 4 tubes per whorl. The cancellate sculpture is unlike that in all species of Siphonochelus. The open canal is distinctive. Perhaps it is closed in some Page 344 part of the growth cycle, but one would have to have more material to be certain. Another peculiar feature is the manner in which the tubes seem to have been folded back, not forming vertical ribs. This species is named in honor of Dr. A. Myra Keen whose ready help is always a boon to the worker. Pterotyphis (Tripterotyphis) arcana DUSHANE, Spec. nov. (Plate 54, Figures 4 to 6) Shell small, base and tubes ivory white, body whorl brown with blotches of brown on earlier whorls, whorls 5 to 6, nuclear whorls two in number, rounded, smooth; adult sculpture developed in first postnuclear whorl, the third with the first tube; varices 3 per whorl, the upper end of each varix left open as a tube; tube openings elevated and at tips of spine; outer face of body whorl with 2 strong white spiral ribs riding over the varices; aperture oval, outer lip with a wide sinuous margin, reflected against the ends of 6 to 10 spiral ribs, smooth within; anterior canal sealed except at end; pillar with remnants of 2 previous canals. Type Material: The holotype is on deposit in the Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History, Invertebrate Zoology Type Collection, catalogue number 1195; 2 para- types, DuShane collection. Type Locality: Mazatlan, Sinaloa, Mexico; Lat. 23°11’N, Long. 106°26’ W. The 3 specimens were collected by the author on a rocky reef, February 24, 1968. Two additional specimens from Banderas Bay, collected in January 1969 by J. DuShane indicate that the range of this species extends at least as far as 275 miles south of the type locality. Dimensions: Holotype, height 15 mm, maximum diameter 8mm, length of aperture 3.2mm; Paratype 1, height 16 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 mm, diameter 8.5mm; Paratype 2, height 14mm, dia- meter 7mm. Discussion: Unlike Pterotyphis (Tripterotyphis) fayae KEEN & CAMPBELL, 1964, which is sculptured with about 22 spiral ribs, specimens of the new taxon have 2 major cords or ribs on the body whorl. Also, the brown coloration is less diffused on P (T.) arcana. It differs from P (T.) lowei Pitssry, 1931 of the West Central American coast, by being easily separable on the basis of the 2 major ribs and the remnants of 2 previous canals; P (T:) lowei has 3. The earliest fossil record seems to be in the Miocene of Europe. Recent species occur in the Caribbean, Panamic, and Gulf of California areas. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am grateful to Dr. A. Myra Keen for her encouragement in suggesting that specimens of this importance should be reported, and to Dr. Bruce Campbell for his critical reading of the manuscript. Photographs are by Mr. Per- fecto Mary, Stanford University. LITERATURE CITED FLemine, C. A. 1962. The genus Pterynotus Swainson (Gastropoda, Family Muricidae) in New Zealand and Norfolk Island. Trans. Roy. Soc. New Zealand, Zool. 2 (14): 109-119; 22 figs. KEEN, A. MYRA 1944. Catalogue and revision of the gastropod subfamily Typhinae. Journ. Paleontology 18 (1): 50-72; 20 figs. Keen, A. Myra, & G. BRucE CAMPBELL 1964. ‘Ten new species of Typhinae (Gastropoda: Muricidae). The Veliger 7 (1): 46-57; plts. 8-11; 3 text figs. (1 July) VELLA, PAUL 1961. Australasian Typhinae (Gastropoda) with notes on the subfamily. Palaeontology, 4 (3): 362 - 391; plts. 46 - 47. Explanation of Plate 54 Figure 1: Cinclidotyphis myrae DUSHANE, gen. nov., spec. nov. Ventral view of holotype, LACM, Invertebrate Zoology Type Col- lection, catalog number 1194 (X 4) Figure 2: Lateral view of the holotype Figure 3: Apical view of the holotype Figure 4: Pterotyphis (Tripterotyphis) arcana DUSHANE, spec. nov. Ventral view of holotype, LACM, Invertebrate Zoology Type Col- lection, catalog number 1105 (X 4) Figure 5: Lateral view of the holotype Figure 6: Apical view of the holotype THe VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 4 [DuSHan_E] Plate 54 Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Page 345 Gross Anatomy and Classification of the Commensal Gastropod, Caledoniella montrouziert SOUVERBIE, 1869 BY JOSEPH ROSEWATER Division of Mollusks, U.S. National Museum, Washington, D.C. 20560 (Plate 55; 4 Text figures) SPECIMENS OF A COMMENSAL GASTROPOD were reported by Manninc (1968) on two species of Gonodactylus (Crustacea:Stomatopoda) from the southwest Indian Ocean. Upon examination these were found to be Cale- doniella montrouziert SOUVERBIE, 1869, originally described from New Caledonia, a species whose anatomy was virtu- ally unknown and whose systematic relationships are poorly understood. In the present paper an attempt is made to describe the gross anatomy of this species, comment on its supposed habits and to suggest for it a familial allo- cation. HISTORICAL The monotypic genus Caledoniella was described briefly by SouversicE (1869) with C. montrouzieri as its only contained species. In the following year SOUVERBIE & Montrouzier (1870) supplemented the original descrip- tion and published a figure of the shell, commenting that the animal had been found living on the thoracic append- ages of Gonodactylus. They made no assignment of the taxon to a higher category. Tryon (1886) assigned the species to the subfamily Lamellariinae of his family Nati- cidae with some doubt because the animal was unknown. As noted by ALLAN (1936), BAsEpow (1905) described a second supposed species of C’aledoniella which subse- quently has been found not to belong to that genus. Preston (1912) described Epistethe gonodactyli from the Persian Gulf and Andaman Islands, and it is now con- sidered to be an absolute synonym of C. montrouzieri. He gave the first sketchy description of the animal, but did not assign it to a family. ALLAN (op. cit.) reported specimens of Caledoniella attached to a Gonodactylus from Albany Passage, Cape York, Queensland. In all probability these are C’. montrouzieri (see Text figure 1). Latest attempts at suprageneric classification of Cale- doniella are those of THrete (1929) and Wenz (1940). THIELE placed it in the Superfamily Lamellariacea, sub- family Lamellariinae and described a radula (see below under Radula). The assignment quite probably was made on the basis of shell shape since Caledoniella resembles Lamellaria, WENz placed it in the Superfamily Pyrami- dellacea, Family Stiliferidae, probably because of the commensal relationship with Gonodactylus. Hoituuis (1951) reviewed the known information relating to the geographic occurrence of Caledoniella montrouziert and mentioned the presence of gastropod egg-capsules on the ventral surface of several of its host Gonodactylus. The same author (1941) figured similar egg-capsules and suggested that they were probably those of Epistethe (= Caledoniella; see Text figure 4). ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I express my appreciation to Raymond B. Manning for calling to my attention the specimens of gastropods upon which this paper is based and to both him and L. B. Holthuis for discussing the relationship with Gonodactylus. I am also grateful to Mrs. Carolyn Bartlett Gast for preparing the plate illustrating animal and shells of Cale- doniella montrouzieri. Ideas and interpretations are mine alone and I accept full responsibility for them. Page 346 THE VELIGER EXTERNAL ANATOMY Material: Shell Tocality H' W’ 1. Male 2.6 4.3 AnjouanId, USNM 679176 (Plate 55, Figs. A - F) Comoro Ids. 2. Female 2.8 5.2 AnjouanId, USNM 679176 (not figured ) Comoro Ids. 3. Male 14 2.2 ‘Tulear, USNM 679177 (Plate 55, Figs. G- I) Madagascar 4. Female 2.8 4.6 ‘Tulear, USNM 678177 (Plate 55, Figs. J - L) Madagascar H' = height in mm; W? = width in mm The male animal from Anjouan, Comoro Islands, was used mainly for the following description and accompa- nying Plate. The three other available specimens were compared and found to agree. Foot: Preston’s (1912) description, although brief, char- acterized the foot and its epipodial fringe. He described the foot as an “‘adhesive organ’, and this may be the case (see Plate 55, Figure C). The ventral surface of the foot (mesopodium) is disklike, and in one of the specimens examined was covered with a thin, chitinous “epidermis” which may be secreted for attachment to the host. Attach- ment is here not considered to be permanent, as evidence gained from a specimen examined zn situ indicates these gastropods move about on the host (see Reproduction). At the anterior edge of the foot there is a groove which ascends dorsally to the base of the propodium. “Epipodial Fringe”: As described by Preston (1912) there occurs dorsal to the foot-disk, laterally and posteri- orly, a foliated (in preserved specimens) fringe of tissue which he termed the “epipodial fringe” (Plate 55, Figures A to C). This structure appears to be the metapodium. Its function in living Caledoniella has not been reported, but may be analogous to that in Natica (FRETTER & Gra- HAM, 1962, fig. 304) in partially covering the shell. A somewhat similar metapodial fringe was described and figured by Quoy « Garmarp (1832, 1833) and by BERcH (1896) in Vanikoro cancellata (LAMaRcK, 1822) (see Rosertson, 1962 and Text figures 2, 3). An operculum was not observed in Caledoniella mont- rouziert. It is probable that the operculum has been lost during the evolution of the species in connection with its adaptation to existence as a commensal. Propodium: Located antero-medially above the anterior edge of the foot and between the anterior edges of the “epipodial fringe” there is a partially bilobed structure Vol. 11; No. 4 which was dorso-ventrally folded in the preserved animal (Plate 55, Figures A to C). This is the propodium. When unfolded (Figure A), it forms a structure which appears to be highly utilitarian. YoncE (1953) has suggested that in Hipponix antiquatus (Linnagus, 1767) the propodi- um may be concerned with egg-capsule attachment. He did not mention the structure in males of H. antiquatus, although it may be shown in the figure of a male (see Figures 1 to 4 Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Page 347 Yonce, 1960, fig. 1). It is well developed in both male and female Caledoniella montrouziert. Since it is prob- able that only the female takes part in egg-mass deposi- tion, the presence of the propodium in males may signify protandry, or the structure may have some additional function, such as in feeding. Proboscis: A prominent, muscular and extensible pro- boscis is present above the propodium with the mouth as a vertical slit at its extremity. Radula: A radula was not found, although three of the animals were dissected in search of that structure. The only known report of a radula in Caledoniella mont- rouzieri is that of THrere (1929): “Mittelplatte der Radula rundlich quadratisch, Schneide breit dreieckig, jederseits mit einigen Zahnchen, Zwischenplatte maBig gro, Schneide spitz, mit einer inneren Nebenzacke, die beiden Seitenplatten mit einfachen hakenformigen Spit- zen.” Unfortunately the radula was not figured, and THIELE’s description contains no clue to the relationships of Caledoniella. 1 am somewhat confused by the absence of a radula in the specimens examined by me and am led to question THIELE’s report until it is confirmed. Tentacles: A pair of fleshy tentacles is located above the proboscis. Due to preservation it is difficult to be certain how extensible these may be in the living animal, but they are relatively long. Tentacles are joined by a con- necting lobe between their bases. The eyes occur as black- pigmented spots buried within the semitransparent tissue of the tentacles and are located somewhat toward the outer edges of their bases. Similar eyes have been re- ported in Vanikoro (BEercuH, 1896) and in Natica (FReET- TER & GRAHAM, 1962). Penis: The penis, located near the base of the right tentacle, is long and slender in the two male specimens examined (see Plate 55, Figures A to C). It is simple (i. e., unbranched) and semitransparent; there is a closed gonoduct passing through its tissue. Mantle and Mantle Cavity: In the illustration (Plate 55, Figures A to C) the mantle edge is rolled back to reveal the animal’s tentacles, eyes and penis. The mantle edge is grayish-white in color and somewhat thickened; behind the edge the outside of the mantle is darkly pigmented, the dark color showing through the transparent shell; it is semitransparent and thin in the region of the ctenidia. The ctenidia are not excessively developed, nor is the mantle cavity extremely large. Shell: There is evidence of sexual dimorphism in the shells of male and female specimens, especially in size. All are wider than long. In shells of male Caledoniella montrouz- teri (Plate 55, Figures D-I) the body whorl is by far the major constituent and the spire consists of the proto- conch and only about one subsequent whorl. Shell color is pale yellowish-white and there is a shiny darker yellow periostracum which becomes deciduous upon drying. Sculpture is limited to fine, irregular axial lines of growth. The columellar lip may be roughly formed and rather deeply concave. Columellar muscle scar is elon- gate-oval, large and well defined; it is clearly visible within the aperture on inner wall of outer lip near pos- terior junction of outer lip and columella. The name “columellar muscle scar” in C. montrouzieri is somewhat a misnomer, as it is not altogether located on the colum- ella! The muscle probably performs the same function as in other prosobranchs, that of pulling the animal into its shell. In the female shell (Plate 55, Figures J to L) the spire of the specimen from Tulear is definitely lifted above the posterior limit of the aperture. There are about 3 whorls present, but the columella is considerably shorter. A small columellar muscle scar is visible within the aperture in a position similar to that in the male specimen. The shell is very narrowly umbilicate, while in the males there is no umbilical opening. The shell of the female from Anjouan is much the same as that of the male, but larger. Protoconch: The protoconch in the two male specimens available for study is unsculptured, smoothly rounded and hardly raised, consisting of about 14 whorls. There is a sharp change in sculpture between protoconch and adult shell, the latter being defined by the beginning of the fine growth lines (Plate 55, Figures D, G). The female protoconch differs only in being partly covered by the adult shell, a phenomenon possibly related to sexual dimorphism. GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION Distributional data accumulated to date indicate a rather extensive range for Caledoniella montrouziert from the western Indian Ocean through the East Indies to western Polynesia in the tropical Indo-Pacific. Until recently the gastropod was reported only on Gonodacty- lus chiragra or Gonodactylus “species.” MANNING (1968) has distinguished two additional host species. It is apparent, therefore, that the relationship is not specific so far as the species of Gonodactylus is concerned. Locality Records: Persian Gulf (Preston, 1912; on Gonodactylus chiragra (Fasricius) ). Comoro Islands: Anjouan Island (Manninc, 1968; on G. platysoma Woop-Mason). Madagascar: Tulear (MANNING, 1968; on G. smithu Pocock). Andaman Islands (Preston, 1912; on G. chiragra). Australia: Albany Passage, Cape York, Queensland (ALLAN, 1936; Gonodactylus sp.). In- Page 348 donesia: Amboina (Hottuuts, 1941; G. chiragra). New Caledonia: Art Island (Souversiz, 1869; SouVERBIE & Montrouzier, 1870; Gonodactylus sp.). Samoa: Mata- pao, Savaii (HottHuts, 1951; G. chiragra). REPRODUCTION Yonce (1953, 1960) has discussed the problems asso- ciated with reproduction in a sedentary gastropod. He demonstrated how in Hipponix antiquatus, a species which lives permanently attached to hard substrates, and in which protandric hermaphroditism is the apparent condition, fertilization is probably effected by individuals of the male phase extending the long penis to the mantle cavity and oviduct of an adjacent female. YoNGE sug- gested that, although sedentary, these gastropods oc- curred in sufficient density to make feasible such an ar- rangement for the adequate perpetuation of the species. Available data indicate that Caledoniella montrouziert always lives on Gonodactylus; at least none has been reported in any other habitat. Information concerning placement of the gastropod on its host seems to indicate a trend. More than one Caledoniella per Gonodactylus has been reported in the literature 4 times: (1) by ALLAN (1936), (2) by HottuHurs (1941, 1951 same case), and (3, 4) by Mannine (1968, specimens de- scribed and figured here). In three of these cases the larger of the two gastropods, here believed to be female, was located near the ventral posterior end of the crusta- ceans’ abdomen between the pleopods; the smaller gas- tropod, believed to be male, was always located near the ventral posterior end of the thorax, between the perio- pods. In the fourth case, Mannine (1968) found two gastropods between the pleopods of G. platysoma. Of the last two specimens reported, only one, a male (Plate 55, Figures A to F), was transmitted to me for study initially. It was located on the Gonodactylus on the poste- rior surface of the first right pleopod, and the place of attachment was later noted to be marked on the pleopod by a mucoid deposit with the outline of the foot. The second specimen was not removed from the Gonodactylus and was not received for examination by me until much of the present paper had been written. It caused a change in certain of the concepts I had formed con- cerning the permanency of attachment to the host. The specimen, a female, was located between the fourth and fifth pleopods on the right side of the ventral posterior abdomen of Gonodactylus platysoma. It did not appear to be attached by its foot to the host, but rather was very firmly grasping a single gill filament of the Gonodactylus between the lobes of its propodium. It THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 is probable that the foot attachment was disturbed during collection or preservation. The animal probably was attached by its foot to the broad anterior surface of the fifth pleopod. In all cases reported, therefore, of a male and female occurring together on Gonodactylus, the male shows a tendency to be located on the posterior thorax or in the last case, the anterior abdomen. The females have been found on the posterior abdomen. The following infor- mation concerning distribution of egg-masses indicates that it is most probable that the female, at least, moves about and is not sessile. Egg-Masses: HottHuis (1941) mentioned and figured egg-masses, supposedly those of Caledoniella montrouzi- ert, on the abdominal pleopods of specimens of Gono- dactylus chiragra from the Moluccas and from Samoa (see Text figure 4, from Hottuuis, 1941). The egg- masses are similar to those described and figured by YonceE (1953, fig. 8) in Hipponix antiquatus except that C. montrouzieri deposits its masses outside of its own mantle cavity. Eleven masses are shown by HoLTHutIs to be attached over an area comprising about 3 abdom- inal segments. The specimen of Gonodactylus platysoma from Anjou- an Island had distributed over its abdominal segments a total of 35 egg-masses. These were attached to the more medial gill filaments of all but the first pair of pleopods. Their distribution was as follows: Left Right Pleopod Number 1 0 0 Pleopod Number 2 3 4 Pleopod Number 3 3 d Pleopod Number 4 6 7 Pleopod Number 5 4 1 Total 16 IG) = 3) Eggs within the capsules were in all stages of develop- ment. Some capsules contained material having no defi- nite form, others contained fully formed young snails whose shells, consisting of about 1 whorl, resembled the protoconchs of the adults; several of the capsules were empty and evidenced terminal apertures through which the young may have escaped. Considering the advanced stage of development of the young in several of the capsules it is almost certain that when hatched from the capsules they are already at the crawling stage. The large number of capsules, together with their widespread placement on the host, would indicate the female moves about over the surface of the pleopods during their depo- sition. It is most probable that fertilization takes place when the female approaches the position of the male in Page 348a THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 Through an oversight, the explanations to the Text figures and the Plate figures were omitted in our April issue of Volume 11. We apologize to the author, Dr. Joseph Rosewater, as well as to our readers. Explanation of the Text figures (see page 346) Figure 1: Caledoniella montrouzieri on ventral side of Gonodactylus sp. from Albany Passage, Cape York, Queensland; note supposed male on thorax, female on posterior abdomen (from ALLAN, 1936, plt. 26, fig. 1). Figures 2 and 3: Vanikoro cancellata LAMARCK; two views of animal; Figure 2, animal in aperture of shell, showing circular foot, propodium, epipodial fringe, operculum, proboscis, tentacles and eyes; Figure 3, animal withdrawn from shell and viewed from side (from Quoy & GammarD, Atlas, 1833, plt. 66 (bis), figs. 20, 21). Figure 4: Egg-masses of Caledoniella montrouzieri on abdominal appendages of Gonodactylus chiragra (from Ho.ituurs, 1941, fig. 7). Explanation of Plate 55 Figures A to F: Caledoniella montrouziert, male from Figure D: Enlarged view of protoconch. Anjouan Island, Comoros Islands. Figures E and F: Two views of shell. Figures A to C: Front and side views showing propodium, Figures G to I: Shell of male from Tulear, Madagascar. foot, “epipodial fringe”, proboscis, tentacles and penis. Figures J to L: Shell of female from same locality. (scale represents 1 mm; detail squares are 0.75 mm) a THE VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 4 [Rosewater] Plate 55 Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Page 349 its location anterior on the host, although it has not yet been proven satisfactorily that the male is completely sedentary. As mentioned by YoncE for Hipponix, the propodium, well developed in Caledoniella montrouzern, probably plays an active role in egg-mass formation and deposition. It was mentioned above that the female specimen of Caledoniella montrouziert which was found in situ on Gonodactylus platysoma was grasping between the lobes of its propodium a single gill filament of the stomato- pod. All of the 35 egg-capsules observed on the stomato- pod were fastened to it by means of the capsules having incorporated along one edge | or 2 gill filaments. When the propodium was examined, its “pouch” was found to be lined with material very much resembling that which forms the egg-capsules. These items of circumstantial evidence leave the strong impression that the propodium is directly involved in egg-mass formation, that its in- trinsic secretions form the egg-capsule around eggs trans- ported from the female gonoduct, and that the lobes of the propodium also manipulate the Gonodactylus’ gill filaments and incorporate them into the capsules. The groove running from the base of the foot to the propodi- um also appears to enter into this process. FEEDING Little real information is available regarding the feeding habits of Caledoniella montrouzieri except in a negative sense. Ctenidia do not appear to be developed for ciliary feeding, nor were a radula or jaws found, contrary to THIELE’s (1929) description. A hint to the possible food of this species was extrapolated from observations made during the examination of the female specimen attached to Gonodactylus platysoma (see Reproduction). It was noted that numerous gill filaments were damaged at their tips and showed evidence of subsequent repair. Damage may have resulted from other causes or have been caused during egg-laying, although filaments were involved other than those to which capsules were at- tached. It is possible that the gastropod manipulates the gill filaments with the propodium (a well-developed pro- podium is also present in males), removes the tips of the filaments (just how this is done would be difficult to explain in the apparent absence of jaws or a radula; perhaps by chemical means), and “sucks” the body fluids of the host with its well-developed proboscis. If this is the case, the stomatopod-gastropod relationship should be termed a host-parasite one rather than a commensal one. If this theory proves invalid, the species also may feed on detritus or remnants of the food of its host. Direct observation of the living animals is needed to settle this question. CLASSIFICATION The previous assignments to family group of Caledoni- ella montrouziert by Tryon and THIELE (Lamellariinae) and by Wenz (Stiliferidae) are considered erroneous. In spite of the lack of a radula in present material, resemb- lance of the animal features to both Vanikoro and Hip- ponix, and of egg-laying habits to Hipponix, suggest placement in the Superfamily Hipponicacea (see TayLor & SoHL, 1962). As Caledoniella does not appear clearly to belong in either the Vanikoridae or Hipponicidae, however, a new family is proposed here: Family Caledoniellidae, new family Type Genus: Caledoniella Souversie, 1869, monotypic. Diagnosis: The family concept is based on the character- istics of the type genus, in turn essentially those of its type species Caledoniella montrouzieri. Further study may uncover evidence which will change this concept, but at present this placement seems to be the most logical for the species. The chance that Cale- doniellidae belongs in Calyptraeacea seems more remote as animal resemblances are not so great (YonGE, 1938). SUMMARY Caledoniella montrouzieri is a reduced-spirally-coiled mesogastropod which lives on species of the stomatopod crustacean Gonodactylus throughout the tropical Indo- Pacific. The animal is adapted for its commensal existence by possessing a “sucker-like” foot. A fringe-like metapodium probably partially covers over the shell in life. A well- developed propodium below the proboscis serves in the formation and attachment of egg-masses and probably is involved in feeding activities. Placement of male gastropods on terminal thoracic or anterior abdominal and of females on posterior abdom- inal segments of Gonodactylus indicates a possible pref erence of these loci as habitats, although the female, at least, moves about on the abdomen of the host during egg-laying and probably feeding activities. The family Caledoniellidae is proposed for Caledoni- ella montrouzieri and the group is assigned to the super- family Hipponicacea with which it shows strongest rela- tionship. Page 350 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 LITERATURE CITED ALLAN, JOYCE 1936. Mysticoncha, a new generic name for Caledoniella Ba- SEDOW, non SOUVERBIE. Rec. Austral. Mus. 19: 391 - 396; pit. 26 BaseEpow, H. 1905. On naticoid genera Lamellaria and Caledoniella from South Australia. Trans. Proc. Roy. Soc. South Austral. 29: 181 - 186; plts. 26 - 29 Bercy, Lupwic SopHus RUDOLF 1896. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Gattungen Narica und Onustus. Verhandl. k.-k. zool.-bot. Gesellsch. Wien, 1896: 1-14 [re- print]; plts. 2-3 FRETTER, VERA & ALASTAIR GRAHAM 1962. _ British prosobranch molluscs, their functional anatomy and ecology London, Ray Soc. xvit+ 755 pp.; 317 figs. Hottuuts, L. B. 1941. | The Stomatopoda of the Snellius Expedition. Biological results of the Snellius Expedition, XII. Temminckia, Journ. Syst. Zool. 6: 241 - 294; figs. 1-9 1951. Note on Caledoniella montrouziert SOUVERBIE, a gastro- pod mollusc living commensally on stomatopod Crustacea. Basteria 15: 69-71 Mannine, R. B. 1968. Stomatopod Crustacea from Madagascar. Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus. 124 (3641): 1-61; figs. 1-16 Preston, H. B. 1912. On a new genus and species of marine parasitic Gastro- poda from the Indian region. Jn: N. ANNANDALE, Fauna Symbiotica Indica No. 2. Rec. Indian Mus. 7: 126 - 127; figs. Quoy, JEAN RENE ConsTANr & JoSEPH Paut GarmarpD 1832. Voyage de découvertes de l’Astrolabe, Zoology 2 (1): 1 to 320; Atlas (1833): plt. 66 (bis), figs. 20 - 22 Rosertson, RoBERT 1962. Vanikoro Quoy & Gatmarp, 1832 (Mollusca, Gastro- poda) ; proposed validation under the Plenary Powers. Z. N. (S) 1524. Bull. Zool. Nomenclat. 19: 332 - 336 SOUVERBIE, S. M. 1869. Diagnoses de mollusques inédits provenant de la Nou- velle-Calédonie. Journ. Conchyl. 17: 416 - 421 SouversiE, S. M. « R. P MontTROUZIER 1870. _ Descriptions d’espéces nouvelles de I’archipel calédonien. Journ. Conchyl. 18: 71 - 83; plt. 9 Taytor, DwicHT WILLARD « NorMAN SOHL 1962. An outline of gastropod classification. 1: 7-32 THIELE, JOHANNES 1929. Handbuch der systematischen Weichtierkunde. Erster Teil, Loricata; Gastropoda. I: Prosobranchia (Vorderkiemer). pp. 1-376; 470 text figs. Tryon, Georce WASHINGTON, Jr. 1886. Naticidae, Calyptraeidac, etc. In: Manual of Con- chology, structural and systematic 8: 1 - 461; plts. 1-79 WENZ, WILHELM 1940. Handbuch der Palaozoologic 6, prt. 1 (6): 721 - 960; figs. 2084 - 2787 YonGcE, CHARLES MAurRICE Malacologia Jena, Gustav Fischer Verlag 1938. Evolution of ciliary feeding in the prosobranchia, with an account of feeding in Capulus ungaricus. Biol. Assoc. U. K. 22: 453 - 468; figs. 1-6 1953. | Observations on Hipponix antiquatus (LINNAEUS). Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. ser. 4, 28 (1): 1-24; 9 figs. (15 July 1953) 1960. Further observations on Hipponix antiquatus with notes Proc. Calif. Acad. Journ. Marine on North Pacific pulmonate limpets. Sci., ser. 4, 31: 111-119; figs. 1-4 ——=. Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Page 351 A Preliminary Survey of Mollusks for Consag Rock and Adjacent Areas, Gulf of California, Mexico HELEN DuSHANE! AND ELLEN BRENNAN 2 (1 Map) INTRODUCTION Consac Rock, GuLF oF CALIFORNIA, Mexico is at Lati- tude 31°07’N, Longitude 114°27’W in the extreme upper reaches of the Gulf of California, east by north of San Felipe Bay, offshore approximately 20 miles. As far as we have been able to determine, no extensive collecting of mollusks has been done in the waters surrounding Con- sag Rock. For this reason we consider it desirable to publish the results of a 3-day trawling expedition in this and the immediately adjacent areas. The list of mollusks which follows is based on the results of a joint trip made by the authors and other indi- viduals on June 27, 28, and 29, 1968 during which 217 species were collected. The trip was organized primarily for members of the Conchological Club of Southern Cali- fornia by Ellen Brennan. The following persons have made their collections from this trip available to us: Twila Bratcher, Don Cadien, Billee Dilworth, Joseph DuShane, William and Joyce Gemmell, Roy Poorman, William E. Viney, Erwin and Gertrude Wahrenbrock. The nudibranch fauna of the Panamic province is only recently becoming better known through the efforts of FarMER (1963, 1966, 1967), Lance (1961, 1966, 1968), and Marcus (1967). Therefore, a determined effort was made by Don Cadien of the Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History to collect representatives of this group of animals and to transport them back alive. Some of the other areas in the Gulf of California have been rather extensively explored over a period of years * 15012 El Soneto Drive, Whittier, California 90605 2 9636 La Cima Drive, Whittier, California 90603 by the California Academy of Sciences (1888 - 1921), the Velero III of the Allan Hancock Foundation (1931 to 1941), and the Puritan - American Museum of Natural History Expedition (1958). Poorman dredged mollusks over a period of years (1961 - 1967) in the areas of San Carlos and Bacochibampo Bays, Guaymas, Sonora, Mexi- co. The specimens collected have been reported (Du- SHANE & Poorman, 1967). PREVIOUS COLLECTING IN THE VICINITY or CONSAG ROCK Historically, the Jesuit, Father Fernando Consag was among the first to make a reconnaissance trip in 1746 to the extreme northern reaches of the Gulf of California (ENGELHARDT, 1929: p. 266). The rock named for him is 289 feet high. A manuscript map by Consag (AppING- Ton MSS), with notations in his own handwriting, states that at Santa Isabel, “hasta aqui llegan los placeros de perlas” (thus far extend the pearl grounds). Santa Isa- bel was at a point on the east coast of peninsular Lower California about where Puertecitos is today. Two records of molluscan collecting in the vicinity of Consag Rock appear in the literature: (1) The Allan Hancock Pacific Expeditions of 1937 and 1940 collected on and around Consag Rock and in San Felipe Bay. Fraser (1943) listed 6 dredging stations and 2 shore stations, but the mollusks remain largely unreported. (2) The 1957 Puritan - American Museum of Natural History Expedition reported 2 dredging stations 14 miles SW of Consag Rock. A general account of this expedition was given by Emerson (1958). Page 352 OCEANOGRAPHIC CONSIDERATIONS Very little is known concerning meteorological and oce- anographic conditions at San Felipe and Consag Rock. Since the Jesuit missionaries established no mission at San Felipe we must rely on other, more recent, reports for information on air and water temperatures. No year around water temperature data are available (RoDEN & Groves 1959: p. 11). The air temperature in the northeastern section of the peninsula shows extremes from 18° F in winter to 128° F in summer (NeEtson, 1922: p. 102), making this the hottest and driest part of Lower California. Occasionally violent storms come up the Gulf of California from the south or are driven over the high Peninsular Range from the Pacific ocean. The most recent devastating storm occurred at San Felipe on September 1, 1967. Summer rains are capricious and irregular; one place may be deluged while another close by may not receive a single drop. These rains are commonly in the form of cloudbursts, usually in July, August, or September with resultant heavy runoff into the western edge of the Gulf of California. Winter rains are also irregular and sometimes last only a few hours. Some years no winter rains fall. Average yearly rainfall is about 2.5 inches (Nelson, 1922: pp. 96, 98, 99). One cannot discuss oceanographic conditions in this area without due consideration of the effects of the Colorado River upon the waters of the Gulf of Califor- nia. Prior to 1938, when Boulder Dam was completed, the Colorado River watershed annually discharged billions of tons of silt into the waters of the Gulf. Since the tidal current in the Gulf is counterclockwise (BERRY, 1954: p. 24; Ronen, 1958: pp. 24, 33) this detrital material had been carried from the Colorado River as far south as San Felipe Point, an isolated volcanic part of the Peninsular Range on the western shore of the Gulf. As a result of this deluge of silt there are many pockets of mud in the northern end of this body of water. According to Sykes (1937: p. 107), “Driftwood, plainly of Colorado River origin, has been observed as far to the southward as the San Luis Islands, along the Lower California shore (latitude 30° N), and in this case the transporting agency was probably tidal current rather than wind.” In the literature no such phenomenon has been reported on the Sonoran coast. With the comple- tion of Boulder Dam and the further construction of an impounding and diversion dam at Parker, the movement of fresh detrital material is practically stopped (SyKEs, IQB/e jee, WS) San Felipe Bay is a shallow depression on the west side of the Gulf, with a sandy bottom and a tidal range of about 22 feet (7 m). The sea floor outside the bay slopes THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 very gradually to a depth of 27 fms (48 m) beyond Con- sag Rock at Lat. 31°12’N, Long. 114°22’W with many mud holes and sandy ridges present. Extensive evapora- tion, which increases salinity, occurs on the shallow pro- tected bays of San Felipe as well as at Adair Bay on the Sonoran side and Concepcion Bay on the Lower Cali- fornia side (RopEN & Groves, 1959: p. 16). In the 30 years since the completion of Boulder and Parker Dams the silt, being more dense than the current-driven sand, still lies in pockets on the ocean floor. The current U. S. Navy Oceanographic map (Chart 620) shows these deposits. FAUNAL RELATIONSHIPS The following lists record 217 species of mollusks, of which 58 are pelecypods, 5 are scaphopods, and 154 are gastropods. One is doubtfully identified (“cf”) and 7 are identified only to genus. Because, to us, there are no known records of mollusks collected this far north in the Gulf of California we con- sider all specimens collected to represent northern exten- sions of the known range with the exceptions of Callio- stoma palmeri, Crepidula arenata, Crepidula incurva, Terebra glauca, Terebra armillata, Nassarius iodes, and Nassarius moestus which the senior author collected inter- tidally in November 1967 at El Gulfo, Sonora, Mexico. Although the molluscan fauna is predominantly Pan- amic, some members of the Californian province are represented in the northern Gulf. Specimens of the fol- lowing species occurring in both the Californian and Pan- amic provinces are also to be found in trawling at Consag Rock and in the immediate vicinity of San Felipe Bay: Nucula linki Dau, Hiatella arctica (LINNAEUS), Aesopus chrysalloides CARPENTER, and Iselica fenestrata CARPEN- TER. The faunal element restricted to the northern and northwestern shores is less well known but includes: Ac- maea strongiana, Nomaeopelta dalliana, Cantharus mac- rospira, Turritella anactor, Terebra berryi, Terebra du- shanae, Recluzia palmeri and Melampus mousleyi. Speci- mens of Nassarina pammicra reported by McLean (1961) from Los Angeles Bay as a range extension northward from Nicaragua have also been collected at Gonzaga Bay by DUSHANE & SpHON (1968) as well as at Puertecitos by DuSHANE (1964). Terebra berry: and Terebra dushanae seem to have a very limited distribution on the northwestern shores of the Gulf of California (type locality for both: Puertecitos). The former has not been found living at San Felipe but occurs sparingly at Gonzaga Bay to the south. The latter species occurs inter- Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER nnn nn eee UNE EEUE SEIS SNE SEE URE SEEED UE tidally uncommonly at Agua Chale, 24 miles south of San Felipe. Terebra variegata, well known throughout the Gulf, is missing from the San Felipe fauna, but was trawled off Agua Chale. Strombina dorsata occurs at both Puertecitos and Gonzaga Bay but is unrecorded at Los Angeles Bay. It occurs uncommonly at San Felipe Bay. Nassarina anitae, described by Campsett (1961) from Guaymas, occurs uncommonly on clumps of Pteria sterna in the vicinity of Consag Rock. Specimens collected are essentially the same as the ones ParKER (1963: p. 167) reported from 11 to 26 meters in the northern Gulf. The more unusual extensions of range northward are represented by specimens including: Nucula linki, Diplo- thyra curta, Ostrea megodon, Lophocardium cumingi, Psephidia cymata, Macoma undulata, Aequipecten pal- meri, Iselica fenestrata, Clathrodrillia adonis, Crassispira bacchia, Clathurella acapulcana, Vitularia salebrosa, and Conus tornatus. Allyn G. Smith (personal communication) reports that a new species of Fusinus was taken in the area of Consag Rock. Another species of Fusinus awaits determination after a comparison of the radula with intertidal speci- mens of Fusinus ambustus. An unusual occurrence of an arthropod taken merits a note: Eupagurus varians BENeEbIcT, together with its commensal hydractinian Janaria mirabilis StTECHOW (Treatise Inv. Paleo.: p. 84) was common at stations 7, 8, and 13. SYSTEMATIC ACCOUNT The following format is adopted: 1. The order in the checklist, the nomenclature, and the species numbers are those given by KEEN (1958) with a few changes as new material was discovered. Re- ferences to species listed by KEEN may be located in her bibliography. References to species described since 1958 are included in the present paper. 2. The habitat and relative abundance of species taken are given. Indications are made for those species not taken alive. 3. The collecting stations referred to in the list by num- bers are shown on the accompanying map. All species reported are from depths of from 3 to 21 fms (5 to 38m). 4. Unusual range extensions are indicated by an asterisk (*) following the “Keen numbers.” The area from which the range is extended follows the collector’s initial. 5. The following collectors are designated by initials: Page 353 Twila Bratcher B Ellen Brennan Br Don Cadien Cc Billee Dilworth D Joseph « Helen DuShane Du William & Joyce Gemmell G Roy Poorman P William E. Viney Vv Erwin & Gertrude Wahrenbrock W The specimens reported are in the private collections of the individuals named and the Cadien collection is in the Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We wish to express our gratitude to Dr. A. Myra Keen and to Roy Poorman for identification of many of the small species; to Dr. James H. McLean of the Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History for critical evalua- tion of the manuscript; to Don Cadien of the same institution for identification of the nudibranchs. ECOLOGICAL NOTES on 16 COLLECTING STATIONS (see Map) Over a three-day period mollusks were trawled at the following 16 stations. After an initial pull at 3 mph, which proved to be too rapid, all pulls were made at 2 mph, the minimum speed of the boat. in the notes below, longitude and latitude are given for the beginning of each pull. 1. Two miles off Punta Diggs, 12 miles S of the town of San Felipe; Lat. 30°51’12” N, Long. 114°39’ W; course 160°. The nets were down for 40 minutes over sand bottom at a depth of 5 fm. Fish and sea stars comprised the bulk of the material trawled. The stomachs of one species of sea star yielded many mollusks, among them species of Nuculana, Pitar, Pandora, Olivella and Acte- ocina. 2. Two miles offshore from Alicia Playa, 18 miles S of the town of San Felipe; Lat. 30°46’N, Long. 114°40’W; course 130°. The nets trawled over sand bottom at a depth of 6 to 7 fm. A great number of sea stars were included in this haul and their stomachs yielded species of Crassinella, Trigoniocardia, Nassarius, and Olivella, along with Chione mariae and juvenile Cosmioconcha palmeri. Page BAe THE VELIGER Isla “WEI Golfo Montague Joo vy GG ‘ 10 San Felipe 62j11 Pg Punta Cc Be . on San Felipe Rock Ba 64 Punta Diggs 13 I 73, 2 ye 5 Puertecitos O¢ : ae Ce Gulf of California Map showing dredging stations EE a a | © 5 10 15 20 25 miles S ~ Vol. 11; No. 4 lt 56 Punta Pefiasco €: \i6 Puerta wig; Penasco Bahia . de aro San Jorge f oS SS Nf: a = Vol. 11; No. 4 3. Four rope tangles were set south of Alicia Playa, 18 miles S of the town of San Felipe, Lat. 30°44’30” N, Long. 114°41’W, in 3 fm of water over rocks. They were baited with decaying fish contained in nylon bags. The tangles were left in the water about 3 hours and when retrieved, the bait was gone. Quick examination on the spot revealed no mollusks; however, later careful examination revealed several specimens of Anachis va- ria, A. milium, and a juvenile Muricanthus nigritus which had crawled high into the untwisted strands of the tangle. If a way could be devised to keep the bait in the tangles, this could prove to be a good collecting device. 4. Two miles offshore from Agua Chale, 24 miles S of = the town of San Felipe; Lat. 30°41’ N, Long. 114°40’06” W;; course 195°. This pull covered one mile of sand bottom at a depth of 5 fm paralleling an offshore rock reef. It yielded fish, crustaceans, and 2 species of sea stars. Examination of the stomachs of these echino- derms produced several species of Nuculana, Pandora brevifrons, Calliostoma palmeri, and Eupleura murici- formis. Eight miles E of Agua Chale, 24 miles S of San Fe- lipe; Lat. 30°41’N, Long. 114°32’W; course 340°. This one-mile pull over sand and mud pockets at a depth of 10 fm yielded a large quantity of fish and 2 species of sea stars, their stomachs containing species of Nuculana, juvenile Trachycardium senticosum, Chi- one mariae, C. gnidia, and C. pulicaria. . Two miles SW of Consag Rock, Lat. 31°06’ N, Long. 114°30’30” W; course 095°. On this pull and all sub- sequent ones, more weight was added to the nets, pro- ducing better results. The nets trawled over one mile of sand bottom at a depth of 12 fm, producing quantities of Hexaplex erythrostomus, Muricanthus nigritus with eggs. Calyptraea, Crepidula, and Crucibulum were com- mon attached to dead shells. Two miles S of Consag Rock, Lat. 31°05’ N, Long. 114°28’30” W; course 100°. On this pull the nets trawled over ? of a mile of sand bottom at a depth of 11 fm. Among the mollusks trawled were Calliostoma palmeri, Ficus ventricosa, Murex elenensis, M. recurvi- rostris lividus, Pteropurpura erinaceoides, Acanthina tuberculata, and Cancellaria cassidiformis. Basket stars of the genus C’rinoidea were common as were sponges, red-brown in color, each growing upon and completely enveloping a shell. Eight miles ENE of Consag Rock, Lat. 31°08’30” N, Long. 114°21’W; course 340°. A one mile pull over sand bottom at a depth of 18 fm produced many THE VELIGER Page 355 clumps of living Pteria sterna among the lamellae of which were Septifer zeteki, Hiatella arctica, Epitonium keratium, Iselica fenestrata, and Nassarina anitae. Vitu- laria salebrosa was taken living on dead P. sterna shells, as was Modiolus capax. 9. Seven miles ENE of Consag Rock, Lat. 31°08’ N, Long. 114°21’W; course 020°. A one mile pull over sand bottom at 15 fm depth produced approximately the same mollusk species as were trawled at Station 8, with the addition of Lioberus splendida and Atrina tuber- culosa. 10. Seventeen miles NW of Consag Rock, Lat. 31°20’18” N, Long. 114°41’W. After a one mile pull at a depth of 14 fm over mud bottom, the nets were full of Astropecten. Examination of the stomachs of the sea stars produced such mollusks as Nucula linki, Natica broderipiana, and Strombina dorsata. 11. Three-fourths of a mile offshore, beginning north of San Felipe Point and ending south of San Felipe Point; Lat. 31°02’30” N, Long. 114°48’ W. This pull was 2 of a mile long, over sand and mud bottom at a depth of 6 fm. The nets yielded a coral-related material con- taining Diplothyra curta and Lithophaga attenuata rogersi. A large mass of aborted egg strings was found to contain a multitude of small shells. Among the gen- era represented were Nucula, Nuculana, Balcis, Niso, Epitonium, Cyclostremiscus, Seila, Aesopus, Nassarina, Anachis, Clavus, Clathrodrillia, and Mangelia. 12. Three miles SW of Consag Rock, Lat. 31°04’30” N, Long. 114°31’30” W; course 080°. This was a one mile pull over sand bottom at a depth of 13 fm. The otter trawl brought up Polinices intemeratus, Hexaplex eryth- rostomus, Muricanthus nigritus with eggs, and Soleno- steira capitaneus. 13. Five miles SSE of Consag Rock, Lat. 31°02’12”N, 114°26’24” W; course 070°. A one mile pull over sand bottom at 11 fm depth produced such mollusks as Ficus ventricosa, Murex recurvirostris lividus, Pteropurpura erinaceoides, Cancellaria cassidiformis, and Conus poor- mani. 14. Eight miles NE of Consag Rock, Lat. 31°12’ N, Long. 114°22’ W; course 080°. A 2 mile pull over sand and clay bottom at a depth of 21 fm produced essentially the same species as were trawled at Stations 8 and 9. 15. Ten miles ENE of Consag Rock, Lat. 31°09’12” N, Long. 114°17’36” W; course 314°. This was a one mile pull over sand and clay bottom at 16 fm depth. The trawl was full of clumps of Pteria sterna attached to which were Ostrea conchaphila, O. megodon, O. pal- Page 356 mula, Chama sordida, C. buddiana, and Nassarina pam- micra. 16. Five miles S of Consag Rock, Lat. 31°03’N, Long. 114°31’30” W; course 270°. This one mile pull over sand bottom at 11 fm depth produced essentially the same mollusk species as were trawled at Station 13. 3% 10 12 13 87 9la 101 106 107 tts ING) 123 124 126 PELECYPODA Nucula declivis Hinps, 1843. Uncommon (10, 11), 6 - 14 fm, mud and sand bottom, in sea star stom- achs and entangled in aborted egg mass (B, C, D, Ee IP ))e Nucula linki Day, 1916. Rare (10), 14 fm, mud and sand bottom, from sea star stomachs; Pt. Fer- min, Gulf of California (Du, G). Nuculana elenensis (SowERBy, 1833). Uncommon (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, entangled in ab- orted egg mass (Br, C, Du). Nuculana impar (Pitssry & Lowe, 1932). Common (1, 4, 5, 10, 15), 5-16 fm; sand, mud, and clay bottom; in sea star stomachs (B, Br, C, D, G). Nuculana laeviradius (Pitspry & Lowe, 1932). Com- mon (4, 5, 9, 10, 14), 5 - 21 fm; sand, mud, and clay bottom; in sea star stomachs (B, C, D, Du, G, P). Septifer zeteki HERTLEIN & STRONG, 1946. Rare (8), 18 fm, sand bottom (C, Du). Lithophaga attenuata rogerst Berry, 1957. Uncom- mon (11), 6 fm, in chunks of coral-related material (C, W). Modiolus capax (Conrab, 1837). Rare (8), 18 fm, attached to Pteria sterna (Du). Lioberus splendida DuNKER, 1857. Uncommon (7, 14), 11-21 fm, sand bottom and on Pteria sterna (Br, Du, G). Pteria sterna (Goutp, 1851). Common (8, 9, 14, 15), 15 - 21 fm, sand and clay bottom (B, Br, C, D, Du, G, P, V, W). Atrina tuberculosa (SowERBy, 1835). Rare (9), 15 fm, sand bottom (C). Ostrea conchaphila CarPENTER, 1857. Uncommon (9, 10, 14, 15), 15 - 21 fm, sand and clay bottom, on dead Pteria sterna shells (Du). Ostrea megodon Han ey, 1846. Rare (15), 16 fm, sand and clay bottom (D). Ostrea palmula CarPENTER, 1857. Uncommon (9, 10, 14, 15), 15-21 fm, sand and clay bottom, on Pteria sterna (Du). Pecten vogdesi ARNOLD, 1906. Uncommon as valves and dead specimens (8, 13), 11- 18 fm, sand bottom (Br). THE VELIGER 128 IZ 147 159 231 238 241 251 256 262 263 264 265 282 286 287 296 306 Vol. 11; No. 4 Aequipecten palmeri (Dati, 1897). Common (7, 8, 9, 13, 16), 11-18 fm, sand bottom (Br, C, Du, G, P). Aequipecten circularis (SowERBY, 1835). Common (6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16), 11-21 fm, sand and clay bottom; attached to Pteria sterna, gastropods, and in sea star stomachs (Br, C, Du, G, P). Plicatula anomioides Kren, 1958. Uncommon (15), 16 fm, sand and clay bottom, on dead Pteria sterna shells (Du). Crassinella pacifica (C.B. ADAMs, 1852). Uncom- mon (2, 11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, in sea star stomachs and entangled in aborted egg mass (B, Br, C, D, Du, P). Mysella compressa (Dat, 1913). Rare (9), 15 fm, sand bottom, in sea star stomachs (P). Chama buddiana C.B. Apams, 1852. Uncommon (8), 18 fm, sand bottom, juveniles attached to dead shells (C, Du). Chama sordida Broperip, 1835. Common (8, 9, 14, 15), 15-21 fm, sand and clay bottom, attached to Pteria sterna (Br, C, Du, G). Trachycardium senticosum (SowErBy, 1833). Com- mon (5, 16), 10-11 fm, sand bottom, juveniles in sea star stomachs (Br, C, Du, P). Trigoniocardia granifera (BRODERIP & SOWERBY, 1829). Uncommon (2, 4), 5 - 7 fm, sand bottom, ju- veniles in sea star stomachs (C, Du, G, P). Laevicardium elatum (SoweErsy, 1833). Rare (6), juvenile, 12 fm, sand bottom (C). Laevicardium elenense (Sowersy, 1840 [?1841]). Uncommon (11, 12), 6- 13 fm, sand and mud bot- tom, juveniles in crevices of coral-related material and in sea star stomachs (Br, C, G, P). Lophocardium annettae (DA.u, 1889). Rare (14), valve only, 21 fm, sand and clay bottom (Br). Lophocardium cumingu (BropErip, 1833). Rare (9), valve only, 15 fm, sand bottom (Du). Transennella tantilla (Goup, 1853). Rare (9), 15 fm, sand bottom, in sea star stomachs (P). Pitar helenae Ousson, 1961. Uncommon (6, 10), 12-14 fm, sand and mud bottom, in sea star stom- achs (Br, Du). Pitar perfragilis Pitspry « Lowe, 1932. Rare (4), 5 fm, sand bottom, in sea star stomachs (P). Pitar concinnus (SoweErBy, 1835). Common (1, 2, 4,5), 5-10 fm, sand and mud bottom, in sea star stomachs (C, Du, G, P). Dosinia ponderosa (Gray, 1838). Uncommon (2, 13), 6-11 fm, sand bottom, juveniles in sea star stomachs (C, Du, P). Vol. 11; No. 4 315 Psephidia cymata Datu, 1913. Uncommon (10, 14, 15), 14-21 fm, sand and clay bottom, in sea star stomachs (C, Du, P). 326 Chione gnidia (BRoDERIP & SOWERBY, 1829). Com- mon, juveniles (1, 2, 4,5), 5-10 fm, sand and mud bottom, in sea star stomachs (C, Du, G, P). 327. Chione pulicaria (BroperiP, 1835). Uncommon (2, 3, 5), 5- 10 fm, sand and mud bottom, juveniles in sea star stomachs (Br, C, Du, P). 331 Chione mariae (p’OrpicNny, 1845). Common (2, 4, 5, 10, 13, 16), 5-14 fm, sand and mud bottom, in sea star stomachs (Br, C, Du, G, P). 335 Chione picta WittETT, 1944. Rare (2), 6-7 fm, sand bottom, in sea star stomachs (B). 392 Tellina amianta Da.t, 1900. Common (10, 14, 15), 14 - 21 fm, mud, sand, and clay bottom; from wash- ings of Pteria sterna and in sea star stomachs (Br, C, Dia, Lee 425 Macoma undatella (HANLEy, 1844). Uncommon (10), 14 fm, mud bottom, in sea star stomachs (Br, Du) GP). 436 Macoma pacis Pitspry & Lowe, 1932. Uncommon (4), 5 fm, sand bottom, in sea star stomachs (G). 438 Strigilla cicercula (Puttippt, 1846). Rare (9), 15 fm, sand bottom, in sea star stomachs (G). 441 Strigilla lenticula Puiipri, 1846. Rare (7), 11 fm, sand bottom, in sea star stomach (P). 450 Donax gracilis HANLEY, 1845. Uncommon (4, 5), 5 - 10 fm, sand and mud bottom, in sea star stomachs (Br, Du, G). 475 Tagelus politus (CARPENTER, 1857). Uncommon (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, juveniles en- tangled in aborted egg mass (C, P). 483 Semele guaymasensis (Pirspry & Lowe, 1932). Un- common (6), 12 fm, sand bottom, in sea star stomachs (Duy G; Py: 489 Semele pacifica Dati, 1915. Uncommon (7), 11 fm, sand bottom, in sea star stomachs (Du, G). 507 Abra tepocana Datu, 1915. Rare (5), 10 fm, sand and mud bottom, in sea star stomachs (G). 527 Corbula nasuta Sowersy, 1833. Common (6 to 10, 12 to 16), 11 - 21 fm, sand, mud, and clay bottom; in sea star stomachs and in washings from Pteria sterna (BY Bre; Dp: Du; GP): 539 Gastrochaena ovata SowErRBy, 1834. Rare, valves only (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, embedded in coral-related material (Br). 542 Hiatella arctica (LINNAEUS, 1767). Common (7, 8, 9, 13, 14, 15), 11-21 fm, sand and clay bottom, nestling on outer edges of Pteria sterna and on Muri- canthus nigritus (Br, C, Du, G, P). THE VELIGER Page 357 545 Panope globosa DaLt, 1898. Valve only (13), 11 fm, sand bottom (C). 553 Diplothyra curta (SowERBy, 1834). Common (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, boring in coral-related material (Br, C, W). 567 Pandora brevifrons SowErBy, 1835. Common (4, 6, 7, 12, 13, 16), 5-13 fm, sand bottom, in sea star stomachs (Br, C, G). 569 Pandora claviculata CARPENTER, 1855. Uncommon (10), 14 fm, mud bottom, in sea star stomachs (Du). 576 Pandora granulata Datu, 1915. Uncommon (1, 2), 5 - 7 fm, sand bottom, in sea star stomachs (Du, P). 591* Asthenothaerus villosior CARPENTER, 1864. Uncom- mon (10), 14 fm, mud bottom, in sea star stomachs; Cape San Lucas, Lower California (P). 597 Cuspidaria didyma (Hinps, 1843). Rare (14), valves only, 21 fm, sand and clay bottom, from sea star stomachs (Du). SCAPHOPODA 2 Dentalium inversum DersHayEs, 1826. Uncommon (14), 21 fm, sand and clay bottom, in sea star stom- achs (B, D). 3 Dentalium oerstedii MOrcuH, 1860. Common (9, 11, 15), 6-10 fm, sand, clay, and mud bottom; in sea star stomachs and entangled in aborted egg mass (B, Br, C, D, Du, P). 5 Dentalium sectum DesuayeEs, 1826. Uncommon (4), 5 fm, sand bottom, in sea star stomachs (G). 9 Dentalium quadrangulare Sowersy, 1832. Uncom- mon (8), 18 fm, sand bottom, in sea star stomach (G). 12 Cadulus panamensis PitsBry & SHARP, 1897. Com- mon (1, 2, 8, 10, 11), 5-18 fm, sand and mud bot- tom, entangled in aborted egg mass, in sea star stom- achs, and in washings from Pteria sterna (B, Br, C, D, Du, G, P). GASTROPODA 30 Diodora alta (C. B. Aas, 1852). Rare (8), 18 fm, sand bottom, attached to dead shell (C). 45 Calliostoma marshalli Lowe, 1935. Common (2, 4, 8, 9, 14, 15), 18 fm, sand and clay bottom, in sea star stomachs and in clumps of Pteria sterna (B, C, D, Du, G). 47 Calliostoma palmeri Dat, 1871. Uncommon (7, 8, 13), 11-18 fm, sand bottom, also in sea star stom- achs (Br, C, Du, P). Page 358 60 Solariella triplostephanus Dati, 1910. Rare (11), 6 66 87 99 105 106 107 108 fm, sand and mud bottom, entangled in aborted egg mass (G). Turbo mazatlanicus Pitspry & Lowe, 1932. Rare (4), 5 fm, sand bottom, in sea star stomachs (B, D). Liotia balboai STRONG & HERTLEIN, 1939. Rare (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, entangled in aborted egg mass (B, D, G). Liotia stearnsi DALL, 1918. Rare (2), 6-7 fm, sand bottom, in sea star stomachs (B, D). Arene rammata (Datu, 1918). Uncommon (4, 5), 5 - 10 fm, sand and mud bottom, in sea star stomachs (B, D). Tricolia equilirata CARPENTER, 1857. Uncommon (9), 15 fm, sand bottom, in sea star stomachs (B, D). Balcis mexicana BartscH, 1917. Rare (1, 11), 5-6 fm, sand and mud bottom, in sea star stomachs and entangled in aborted egg mass (Br, C, Du). Niso excolpa BartscH, 1917. Uncommon (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, entangled in aborted egg mass (B, C, D, Du). Epitonium keratium Dat, 1919. Uncommon (8, 11), living on Pteria sterna shells, 18 fm; entangled in aborted egg mass, 6 fm, sand and mud bottom (Br, C, Du). Epitonium walkerianum HERTLEIN & STRONG, 1951. Uncommon (2, 11), 5 - 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, in sea star stomachs and dead in aborted egg mass (Br, C, G). Epitonium reflexum (CARPENTER, 1856). Uncom- mon (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, dead in aborted egg mass (C, Du). Epitonium bakhanstranum KEEN, 1962. Uncommon (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, dead in aborted egg mass (Br, C, Du). Epitonium appressicostatum Daur, 1917. Uncom- mon (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, dead in aborted egg mass (Du). Epitonium barbarinum Datu, 1919. Common (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, dead in aborted egg mass (B, D, P). Epitonium durhamianum HERTLEIN & STRONG, 1951. Rare (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, dead in aborted egg mass (B, D, P). Lacuna succinea Morcu, 1860. Rare (8), 18 fm, sand bottom, juveniles in washings from Pteria ster- na; Gulf of Nicoya, Costa Rica (C, Du). Cyclostremiscus bifrontia CARPENTER, 1857. Rare (4), 5 fm, sand bottom, in sea star stomach (G). Cyclostremiscus tricarinatus C.B.Apams, 1852. Common (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, entangled in aborted egg mass (B, Br, C, D, Du, P). THE VELIGER 180 187 233 240 242 245 248 251 Vol. 11; No. 4 Macromphalina sp. Rare (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, entangled in aborted egg mass (Br). Delphinoidea hambachi Stronc & HERTLEIN, 1939. Rare (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, entangled in aborted egg mass (P). Teinostoma amplectans CARPENTER, 1857. Rare (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, entangled in aborted egg mass (C). Teinostoma ecuadorianum Pitsspry & Oxsson, 1941. Rare (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, in aborted egg mass; Punta Blanca, Ecuador (B, D, P). Vitrinella dali (Bartscu, 1911). Uncommon (7), 11 fm, sand bottom, in sea star stomach (D). Assiminea sp. Uncommon (15), 16 fm, sand and clay bottom, on Pteria sterna shells (G). Turritella anactor BERRY, 1957. Uncommon (7, 13), 11 fm, sand bottom, dead specimens and juveniles in sea star stomachs (Br, C, Du, G). Turritella nodulosa Kinc & Broperip, 1832. Uncom- mon (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, juveniles en- tangled in egg mass (P). Metaxia sp. Uncommon (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, in aborted egg mass (G). Seila assimilata C. B. Apams, 1852. Common (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, entangled in aborted egg mass (B, Br, D, P). Seila sp. Uncommon (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bot- tom, entangled in aborted egg mass (C, Du). Triphora hanna: Baker, 1926. Rare (8), 18 fm, sand bottom, in washings from Pteria sterna (Du). Iselica fenestrata CARPENTER, 1864. Common (8, 9, 14, 15), sand and clay bottom, on Pteria sterna; San Diego, California (Br, C, Du, G, P). Calyptraea mamillaris Bropertp, 1834. Common (1, 7, 8, 9, 12 to 16), 5 - 21 fm, sand, clay, and mud bottom; attached to dead shells (Br, Du, P). Crepidula arenata (Broperip, 1834). Common (7, 8, 13), 11 - 18 fm, sand bottom, on Calliostoma pal- ment (Du). Crepidula incurva (Broperip, 1834). Common (7, 8, 13), 11-18 fm, sand bottom, on Calliostoma pal- meri (Du). Crepidula onyx SowERBY, 1824. Common on dead shells (6, 7, 12, 13), 11-13 fm, sand bottom (B, Br, D, Du, P). Crepidula striolata MEeNKeE, 1851. Uncommon (7, 11), 6-11 fm, sand and mud bottom, entangled in aborted egg mass and on dead bivalves (G, P). Crucibulum personatum KEEN, 1958. Common (11, 13, 16), sand and mud bottom, on coral-related ma- terial and on dead shells (B, Br, C, D, Du, P). Vol. 11; No. 4 252 Crucibulum scutellatum (Woop, 1828). Common (13, 16), 11 fm, sand bottom, on other shells (Br, C, Duy PE): 254 Crucibulum spinosum (SoweErBy, 1824). Common (8, 11, 14, 15), 6-21 fm, sand, mud, and clay bot- tom; juveniles on other shells and entangled in abort- ed egg mass (Du, G, P). 261 Natica idiopoma Pitssry &« Lowe, 1932. Rare (8), 18 fm, sand bottom, in sea star stomachs (B, P). 263 Natica broderipiana Réciuz, 1844. Uncommon. (10), 14 fm, mud bottom, in sea star stomachs (Br, G). 266 Polinices bifasciatus (GriFFITH & PcEoN, 1834 from Gray MS.). Uncommon (13), 11 fm, sand bottom, juvenile in sea star stomach (Br). 269 Polinices intemeratus (PxHivippt, 1853). Uncommon (12), 13 fm, sand bottom (Du). 272 Polinices uber (VALENCIENNES, 1832). Uncommon (1, 2,4), 5-7 fm, sand and mud bottom, in sea star stomachs (B, D, G). 274 Polinices reclusianus (DESHAYES, 1839). Common (1, 4, 5), 5-10 fm, juveniles in sea star stomachs (B, Br, C, D, Du, G, P). 280 Lamellaria inflata (C. B. ApaMs, 1852). Rare (14), _ 21 fm, sand and clay bottom, in washings from Pteria sterna (B). 289 Erato columbella MENxKE, 1847. Uncommon (15), 16 fm, sand and clay bottom with clumps of Pteria sterna, in sea star stomachs (D, P). 317 Ficus ventricosa (SowERBY, 1825). Uncommon (7, 13, 14), 11 - 21 fm, sand and clay bottom (C, D, Du, G). 335 Murex elenensis Dati, 1909. Uncommon (7, 16), 11 fm, sand bottom (Du, V). 336a Murex recurvirostris lividus CARPENTER, 1857. Un- common (7, 13), 11 fm, sand bottom (B, C, D, P). 339 Hexaplex erythrostomus (Swainson, 1831). Com- mon (6, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14), 11 - 21 fm, sand and clay bottom (Br, C, Du, P, V, W). 344 Muricanthus nigritus (PHttiprt, 1845). Common (6, 7, 12, 13), 11 - 13 fm, sand bottom (B, Br, C, D, Du, G, P, V). 348 Pteropurpura erinaceoides (WALENCIENNES, 1832). Uncommon (7, 13), 11 fm, sand bottom (B, Br, D, V). 364 Eupleura muriciformis (BropEriP, 1833). Common (4, 11), 5-6 fm, sand and mud bottom, juveniles in sea star stomachs and entangled in aborted egg mass (B, Br, C, D, Du, G, P). 370* Vitularia salebrosa (KiNG & Broperip, 1832). Un- common (8, 9, 14, 15), sand and clay bottom, at- tached to Pteria sterna; Guaymas, Sonora, Mexico (Br, C, Du, G). THE VELIGER Page 359 409 Acanthina tuberculata (SowrErBy, 1835). Uncom- mon (7), 11 fm, sand bottom (C, Du). 417 Aesopus sanctus Dati, 1919. Uncommon (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, in aborted egg mass (B, Br, D, P). * Aesopus chrysalloides CARPENTER, 1864. Rare (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom; San Diego, California (Du, G). 429 Anachis diminuta (C.B.Apams, 1852). Uncommon (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, dead in aborted egg mass (Du, P). 442 Anachis milium (Dat, 1916). Common (3, 11), taken in rope tangles, 3 fm, rocky bottom; in aborted egg mass, 6 fm, sand and mud bottom (Br, C, Du). 444 Anachis nigricans (SowErBy, 1844). Uncommon (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, dead in egg mass (P). 454 Anachis sanfelipensis Lowe, 1935. Uncommon (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, juveniles dead in egg mass (Du). 464 Anachis varia (SoweRBy, 1832). Common (3, 7, 11), taken in rope tangle, 3 fm, rocky bottom; in sea star stomachs and on chunks of coral-related materi- al, 6 - 11 fm, sand and mud bottom (B, Br, C, D, Du, GSP)r 470 Cosmioconcha palmeri (Dati, 1913). Common as juveniles (2, 5, 8, 11), 6-18 fm, sand and mud bot- tom, in sea star stomachs and in egg mass (B, Br, C, D, Du, G, P). 490 Nassarina pammicra PitsBry & Lowe, 1932. Rare (15), 16 fm, sand and clay bottom, on Pteria sterna (Du). Nassarina anitae CAMPRELL, 1961. Uncommon (8), 18 fm, sand bottom, in washings from Pteria sterna (Gs ID wy, IP )e Nassarina, possibly new spec. Rare (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, in aborted egg mass (Br, G). 508 Strombina dorsata (SowerBy, 1832). Uncommon (10, 11, 14), 6- 21 fm, sand, mud, and clay bottom; in sea star stomachs and dead in egg mass (Br, Du). 512 Strombina gibberula (SoweRsy, 1832). Uncommon (14), 21 fm, sand and clay bottom with clumps of Pteria sterna, in sea star stomachs (B, C, D, Du, G). 541 Solenosteira capitaneus (Berry, 1957). Uncommon (8, 11), 6- 13 fm, sand bottom (Br, P). 543 Solenosteira macrospira (BERRY, 1957). Uncommon (8, 11), 6- 18 fm, sand bottom, dead specimens and juveniles entangled in egg mass (C, Du, G). 563 Phos gaudens Hinps, 1844. Common (11, 14), 6 to 21 fm, mud, sand, and clay bottom; in sea star stomachs and entangled in egg mass (B, Br, C, D, Du, G, P). Page 360 577 Nassarius guaymasensis (Prtspry & Lowe, 1932). Common (11), sand and mud bottom, dead in egg mass (C, Du, G). 583 Nassarius pagodus (REEvE, 1844). Uncommon (2, 6, 10), 6 - 14 fm, sand and mud bottom (Br, Du, P). 586 Nassarius taeniolatus (Puiipri, 1845). Common (2, 10, 11), 6- 14 fm, sand and mud bottom, in sea star stomachs and entangled in egg mass (B, Br, C, D, Du, G, P). 587 Nassarius versicolor (C. B. ApaMs, 1852). Common (9, 10, 11), 6- 15 fm, sand and mud bottom, in sea star stomachs and in egg mass (B, Br, C, D, Du, G, P). 591 Nassarius iodes (Dati, 1917). Common (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, entangled in egg mass (Du, G, P). 593 Nassarius moestus (Hinps, 1844). Uncommon (1, 2), 5-7 fm, sand bottom, in sea star stomachs (Du, P). Nassarius howardae Cuace, 1958. Uncommon (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, entangled in egg mass (Br, P). 610 Fusinus dupetitthouars: (KieNeR, 1846). Uncom- mon (8), 18 fm, sand bottom, dead (Br, C). 612 Fusinus ambustus (Goutp, 1853). Uncommon (13), 11 fm, sand bottom, dead (G). 614 Fusinus fredbakert Lowe, 1935. One dead specimen (11), 6 fm, sand bottom, entangled in egg mass (C). Fusinus, new spec. Uncommon (7, 13), 11 fm, sand bottom (C, Du). Fusinus spec. (possibly new, or dredged form of EF ambustus). Common (7 to 10, 13, 16), 11-16 fm, sand and mud bottom (B, Br, D, Du, P, V). 625 Oliva spicata (R6p1NG, 1798). Uncommon (11, 14), 6-21 fm, sand bottom (Br, C, Du, G). 627 Oliva undatella LaMarck, 1810. Uncommon (11), 6 fm, sand bottom, dead (C, Du, P). 634a Olivella fletcherae BERRY, 1958. Common (2, 4, 7, 11, 13, 16), 5- 11 fm, sand bottom, in sea star stom- achs and in egg mass (Br, C, Du, G, P). Olivella stevent BurcH & CAMPBELL, 1963. Rare (4), 5 fm, sand bottom, in sea star stomachs (P). 693 Cancellaria cassidiformis SowERBY, 1832. Uncom- mon (6, 7), 11-12 fm, sand and mud bottom (C, Du, G). 717 Daphnella bartschi Dati, 1919. Rare (13), 11 fm, sand bottom, in sea star stomachs (B, D). 741 Clavus roseolus (HERTLEIN & STRONG, 1955). Rare (7), 11 fm, sand bottom, in sponge (P). 747° Clavus aeolius (Dati, 1919). Uncommon (1, 11), 5 - 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, in sea star stomachs and in egg mass (B, C, D, Du, G). 748 Clavus aerope (Datu, 1919). Rare (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, in egg mass (Br). THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 753 Clavus ianthe (Dati, 1919). Common (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, in egg mass (B, Br, C, D, Du, G). 758 Clavus pembertoni Lowe, 1935. Uncommon (7), 11 fm, sand bottom, in sponge (P). 765 Clathrodrillia callianira Datu, 1919. Rare (15), 16 fm, sand and clay bottom with clumps of Pteria Sterna, in sea star stomachs (Br). 767 Clathrodrillia maura (SowerRsy, 1834). Rare (8), 18 fm, sand bottom, in sponge (Br). 769 Clathrodrillia pilsbryi Lowe, 1935. Uncommon (11, 14), 6-21 fm, sand, mud, and clay bottom; in sea star stomachs and in egg mass (B, Br, D, Du, G). 771 Clathrodrillia adonis (Pirspry & Lowe, 1932). Un- common (15), 16 fm, sand and clay bottom, from sea star stomachs (Du). 772 Clathrodrillia alcestis Dat, 1919. Rare (15), 16 fm, sand and clay bottom, in sea star stomach (P). 774 Clathrodrillia duplicata (Sowersy, 1834). Un- common (7), 11 fm, sand bottom, in sponge (B, Br, D). 776 Clathrodrillia halis Dati, 1919. Uncommon (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, entangled in egg mass (B, D, P). 776a Clathrodrillia halis soror (Pitspry & Lowe, 1932). Common (6, 7, 11, 13), 6 - 12 fm, sand and mud bot- tom; in sponge, in sea star stomachs, and in aborted egg mass (Br, C, Du, G, P). 790 Crassispira bacchia Datu, 1919. Common (6, 11), 6 - 12 fm, sand and mud bottom, in sea star stomachs and dead in egg mass (B, Br, C, D, Du, P). Crassispira cf. C. pauxillus Reeve, 1843. Uncommon (1), 5 fm, sand bottom, in sea star stomachs (Du). 825 Crassispira pluto Pispry « Lowe, 1932. Uncom- mon (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, dead in egg mass (Br). 843 Hindsiclava militaris (Reeve, 1843 ex Hinps MS). Uncommon (7), 11 fm, sand bottom, in sponge (Br). 858 Mangelia aethra (Dati, 1919). Rare (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, in egg mass (D). 862 Mangelia melita (Dati, 1919). Common (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, in egg mass (B, Br, C, D, Du, P). 866 Mangelia subdiaphana CarPENTER, 1864. Rare (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, in aborted egg mass (C, Du). 867 Mangelia antiochroa Pitspry & Lowe, 1932. Com- mon in sea star stomachs (B, D, G). 868 Mangelia antipyrgus Pitspry & Lowe, 1932. Com- mon (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, in egg mass (C, Du, P). Vol. 11; No. 4 869 875 881 883 909 910 Mangelia cymatias Pitspry « Lowe, 1932. Uncom- mon (9, 11), 6- 15 fm, sand and mud bottom, in sea star stomachs and in egg mass (B, Br, D). Mangelia roperi Dati, 1919. Uncommon (1, 11), 5 - 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, in sea star stomachs and entangled in egg mass (B, C, D, Du). Clathurella rigida (Hinps, 1843). Rare (2), 6-7 fm, sand bottom, in sea star stomach (B). Clathurella trichoides (Dat, 1919). Rare (15), 16 fm, sand and clay bottom (B). Clathurella acapulcana (Pirspry & Lowe, 1932). Uncommon (10), 14 fm, mud bottom, in sea star stomachs (Du, G, P). Clathurella adria (Dax, 1919). Uncommon (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, in aborted egg mass (B, D, Du, P). Pleuroliria artia Berry, 1957. Uncommon (8), 18 fm, sand bottom, dead (G). Pleuroliria nobilis (Hinps, 1843). Rare (13, 15), 11 - 16 fm, sand and clay bottom, in sponges and in Pteria sterna clumps (Du, G). 91la Pleuroliria oxytropis albicarinata (SowERBY, 1870). 913 926 928 956 963 966 980 992 Uncommon (7, 13), 11 fm, sand bottom, in sponges (Br, P). Pleurolinia picta (REEVE, 1843, ex Beck MS). Un- common (13), 11 fm, sand bottom, in sponges (Du, P). Conus perplexus SowErBy, 1857. Rare (8), 18 fm, sand bottom, juveniles (C). Conus tornatus SowERBy, 1833, ex BropErip MS. Uncommon (9), 11 fm, sand bottom (Du). Conus poormani Berry, 1968. Rare (13), 11 fm, sand bottom (Br). Terebra armillata Hinps, 1844. Juveniles common (11, 14), 6-21 fm, sand, mud, and clay bottom; in sea star stomachs and in aborted egg mass (B, Br, C, D, Du). Terebra glauca Hinps, 1844. Common (6, 11), 6 - 12 fm, sand and mud bottom, juveniles in sea star stomachs and in egg mass (B, Br, C, D, Du, G). Terebra ira PitsBry & Lowe, 1932. Uncommon (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, juveniles in aborted egg mass (B, Br, C, D, Du). Terebra variegata Gray, 1834. Uncommon (4, 5), 5 - 10 fm, sand and mud bottom, juveniles in sea star stomachs (G). Terebra dushanae CAMPBELL, 1964. Rare (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, dead in aborted egg mass (G). Acteocina angustior BAKER & Hanna, 1927. Com- mon (2, 4, 8, 9, 14, 15), 5-18 fm, sand and clay bottom, in sea star stomachs and in washings from Pteria sterna (B, Br, C, D, Du). THE VELIGER Page 361 994 Acteocina inculta (GoutD & CarPENTER, 1857). 997 Uncommon (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, in aborted egg mass (G). Cylichna defuncta Baker & Hanna, 1927. Uncom- mon (1), 5 fm, sand bottom, in sea star stomachs (C, Du). Cylichna fantasma (BAKER « Hanna, 1927). Rare (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, in aborted egg mass (C, Du). Cylichnella sp. Rare (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bot- tom, in aborted egg mass (G). 1000 Pyramidella adamsi CarPENTER, 1864. Rare, in sea star stomachs (G). 1003. Pyramidella mazatlanica Dat. & BartscH, 1909. Uncommon (10), mud bottom, in sea star stomachs (D). Odostomia clathratula C. B. ApaMs, 1852. Rare (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, in egg mass (P). Odostomia corintoensis HERTLEIN & STRONG, 1951. Uncommon (6), sand bottom, in sea star stomach; Corinto, Nicaragua (Du). Turbonilla academica STRONG & HERTLEIN, 1939. Rare (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, in egg mass; Bahia Honda, Panama (G). Turbonilla amortajadensis BAKER, HANNA & STRONG, 1928. Rare (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, in egg mass (Du). Turbonilla azteca BAKER, HANNA & STRONG, 1928. Uncommon (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, in egg mass (Du). Turbonilla contrerasiana HERTLEIN & STRONG, 1951. Rare (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, in egg mass (Du). Turbonilla gonzagensis BAKER, HANNA & STRONG, 1928. Rare (11), 6 fm, sand and mud bottom, in egg mass (Du). Turbonilla prolongata CarPENTER, 1857. Uncommon (10, 11), 6-14 fm, mud and sand bottom, in sea star stomachs and in aborted egg mass (B, C, D, P). Nembrotha eliora Marcus, 1967. Uncommon (14), 21 fm, sand and clay bottom with clumps of Pterza sterna (C). Coryphella cynara Marcus, 1967. Uncommon (14), 21 fm, sand and clay bottom with clumps of Pteria sterna (C). Flabellinopsis iodinea (Cooper, 1862). Uncommon (8, 9, 14, 15), 15 - 21 fm, sand and clay bottom with clumps of Pteria sterna (C). Spurilla chromosoma CocKERELL & Euiot, 1905. Uncommon (8, 9, 14, 15), sand and clay bottom, on Pteria sterna (C). Page 362 LITERATURE CITED ApaMs, CHARLES BAKER 1852. Catalogue of shelis collected at Panama, with notes on synonymy, station, and habitat. Ann. Lyceum Nat. Hist. New York 5: 229 - 344 (June) ; 345-548 (July) Appincton MSS No. 17660 British Museum BAKER, FREDERICK 1926. Mollusca of the family Triphoridae. Acad. Sci., ser. 4; 15 (6) :223 - 239; plt. 24 BAKER, FREDERICK & G Dattas HANNA 1927. | Marine Mollusca of the order Opisthobranchiata. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci., ser. 4, 16 (5): 123-135; plt. 4 (22 April 1927) Baker, FREDERICK, G DaLLas HANNA & ARCHIBALD M. STRONG 1928. Some Pyramidellidae from the Gulf of California. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci., ser. 4, 17 (7): 205 - 246; plts. 11-12 (29 June 1928) Proc. Calif. (26 April 1926) BartscH, PAauL 1911. The Recent and fossil mollusks of the genus Cerithi- opsis from the west coast of America. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 40 (1823) : 327 - 367; plts. 36 - 41 (8 May 1911) 1917. A monograph of West American melanellid mollusks. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 53 (2207): 295-356; plts. 34-49 (13 August 1917) Berry, SAMUEL STILLMAN 1958. Is the Colorado River an efficient barrier to mollusk distribution? Amer. Malacol. Union Bull. 24: 24 1962. Leaflets in Malacology 1 (20): 123-130 (13 Nov.) 1964. Notices of new eastern Pacific Mollusca — VI. Leaflets in Malacology 1 (24): 147 - 154 (29 July 1964) 1968. Notices of new eastern Pacific Mollusca. -— VII. Leaflets in Malacology 1 (25): 154 - 158 (26 Sept. 1968) Burcu, JoHN Quincy « G. Bruce CAMPBELL 1963. Four new Olivella from the Gulf of California. Nautilus 76 (4): 120-126; 2 plts.; 6 figs. (April 1963) CampBELL, G. Bruce 1961. Four new Panamic gastropods. The Veliger 4 (1): 25 - 28; plt. 5 (1 July 1961) 1964. New terebrid species from the eastern Pacific (Mollusca: Gastropoda). The Veliger 6 (3): 132 - 138; plt. 17 (1 January 1964) CARPENTER, PHILIP PEARSALL 1857. © Catalogue of the collection of Mazatlan shells in the British Museum collected by Frederick Reigen. London, British Museum xvi + 552 pp. (June 1857) 1864. | Supplementary report on the present state of our know- ledge with regard to the Mollusca of the west coast of North America. Reprt. Brit. Assoc. Adv. Sci. for 1863: 517 - 686 (August 1864) Cuace, Emery PERKINS 1958. A new mollusk from San Felipe, Baja California. Trans. San Diego Soc. Nat. Hist. 12: 333 - 334; fig. 1 (16 October 1958) CockERELL, THEODOR Dru ALISON & CHARLES ELIOT 1905. Notes on a collection of California nudibranchs. Journ. Malacol. 12 (3): 31-53; plts. 7, 8 Cooper, James GRAHAM 1862. Some genera and species of California Mollusca. Proc. Calif. Acad. Nat. Sci. 2: 202 - 207 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 DaLL, WILLIAM HEALEY 1918. Descriptions of new species of shells, chiefly from Mag- dalena Bay, Lower California. Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington 31: 5-8 (27 February 1918) 1919. Descriptions of new species of Mollusca from the North Pacific Ocean in the collection of the United States National Museum. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 56 (2295): 293-371 (30 August 1919) DuSHANE, HELEN 1962. A checklist of mollusks for Puertecitos, Baja California, Mexico. The Veliger5 (1): 39-50;1map (1 July 1962) DuSwan_e, HELEN « Roy PoorRMAN 1967. A checklist of mollusks for Guaymas, Sonora, Mexico. The Veliger 9 (4): 413-441; 1 map (1 April 1967) DuSwane, HELEN & GaLe G. SPHON 1968. A checklist of intertidal mollusks for Bahia Willard and the southwestern portion of Bahia San Luis Gonzaga, Baja California, Mexico. The Veliger 10 (3) : 233 - 246; plt. 35; 1 map. (1 January 1968) Emerson, WILLIAM KEITH 1958. Results of the Puritan-American Museum of Natural History expedition to western Mexico. 1. General account. Amer. Mus. Novit. No. 1894: 1 - 25; 9 figs. (22 July 1958) ENGELHARDT, Fr. ZEPHYRIN, O. F. M. 1929. The Missions and Missionaries of California, vol. 1 Lower California. Mission Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, 784 pp. FarMErR, WESLEY M. 1963. Two new opisthobranch mollusks from Baja California. Trans. San Diego Soc. Nat. Hist. 13 (6): 81 - 84; plt. 1; fig. 1 1966. Range extension of Berghia amakusana (Basa) to the East Pacific. The Veliger 9 (2): 251; 1 text fig. (1 October 1966) 1967. Notes on the Opisthobranchia of Baja California, Mexi- co, with range extensions - II. The Veliger 9 (3): 340 - 342; 1 text fig. (1 January 1967) Fraser, C. McLEAN 1943. General account of the scientific work of the Velero III in the eastern Pacific, 1931-41. Part III. A ten-year list of the Velero III collecting stations (charts 1 - 115). Allan Hancock Pacif. Exped. 1 (3) : 259 - 431. Univ. So. Calif: Press, Los Angeles, California HeErTLEIN, LEo Grorce & ARCHIBALD McCiure STRONG 1951. | Eastern Pacific expeditions of the New York Zoological Society. XLIII. Mollusks from the west coast of Mexico and Central America; PartsI-X. Zoologica, prt. 10; 36: 67 - 120; pits. 1-11 (20 August 1951) KEEN, A. Myra 1958. Sea shells of tropical West America; marine mollusks from Lower California to Colombia. Stanford, Calif. (Stanford Univ. Press) 1966. | MorcwH’s west central American molluscan types with proposal of a new name for a species of Semele. Calif. Acad. Sci. Occ. Papers 59: 1 - 33; 41 figs. (30 June 1966) LaNncE, JAMES ROBERT 1961. A distributional list of southern California opistho- branchs. The Veliger 4 (2) : 64 - 69 (1 October 1961) 1966. New distributional records of some northeastern Pacific Opisthobranchiata (Mollusca: Gastropoda) with descriptions of two new species. The Veliger 9 (1) : 69- 81; 12 text figs. (1 July 1966) i-xi + 624 pp.; illus. Vol. 11; No. 4 Lance, JAMES ROBERT 1968. New Panamic nudibranchs (Gastropoda: Opisthobran- chia) from the Gulf of California. Trans. San Diego Soc. Nat. Hist. 15 (2): 13 pp.; 2 plts.; 5 figs. (8 January) LeicH, RANDOLPH 1941. Forgotten waters. New York, N. Y. McLean, James Howarp 1961. Marine mollusks from Los Angeles Bay, Gulf of Cali- fornia. Trans. San Diego Soc. Nat. Hist. 12 (28): 449 to 476; figs. 1-3 (15 August 1961) Marcus, EveLine « Ernst Marcus 1967. American opisthobranch mollusks. Studies in tropical Oceanography no. 6. Inst. Marine Sci., Univ. Miami, 324 pp. J.B.Lippincott Co., Florida; viii+ 256 pp.; 1 plt.; 155 +95 text figs. (December) Moore, Raymonp Cecm. (editor and director) 1956. Treatise on invertebrate paleontology - (F) Coe- lenterata — Geol. Soc. ; Univ. Kansas Press; 498 pp.; illus. Morcu, Orro AnprEAs Lowson 1860. Beitrige zur Molluskenfauna Central-Amerikas. Malak. Blatter 7: 66-96 (July 1860); 97- 106 (Aug. 1860) NeEtson, Epwarp WILLIAM 1922. Lower California and its natural resources. Nat. Acad. Sci. 16. First Mem. Governmt. Printing Office, Wash- ington, 194 pp. (reprinted 1966) Oxsson, AxEL ADOLF 1961. Mollusks of the tropical eastern Pacific particularly from the southern half of the Panamic-Pacific faunal pro- vince (Panama to Peru). Panamic-Pacific Pelecypoda. Paleont. Res. Instit. Ithaca, N. Y.: 574 pp.; 86 plts. (10 March 1961) Syxes, GopFREY 1937. | The Colorado delta. no. 19, 193 pp. U.S. Navy Oceanographic Office THE VELIGER Page 363 Parker, Rosert H. 1963. Zoogeography and ecology of some macro-invertebrates, particularly mollusks, in the Gulf of California and the conti- nental slope off Mexico. Vidensk. Medd. Dansk Naturhist. For., 126: 1-178; plts. 1-15 Pitspry, Henry Aucustus « Axe, ApoLtF OLsson 1941. A Pliocene fauna from Western Ecuador. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 93: 1 - 79; plts. 1 - 19 ReEEvE, Lovett Aucustus 1843. Descriptions by Mr. Lovell Reeve of new species of shells figured in the “Conchologia systematica.” Proc. Zool. Soc. London for 1842: 197 - 200 (February 1843) Ropen, Gunnar I. 1958. | Oceanographic and meteorological aspects of the Gulf of California. Pacific Sci. 12 (1): 21-45; 19 figs.; 4 tables (January 1958) Proc. Acad. (9 Sept. 1941) RopEen, Gunnar I. « G. W. Groves 1959. Recent oceanographic investigations in the Gulf of Cali- fornia. Journ. Mar. Res. Sears Found. 18 (1): 10-35; 16 figs.; 3 tables (30 June 1959) SLEvin, JoserH R. 1923. Expedition of the California Academy of Sciences to the Gulf of California in 1921. General Account. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci., ser. 4, 12 (6) :55-73; 1 map (June 1923) Smiru, ALLYN Goopwin 1966. Staghorns and longhorns. Pacif. Discov. 19 (5): 30-31; 5 photographs (September/October 1966) Srronc, ArcHiBALD McCuure & Leo GrorcE HERTLEIN 1939. Marine mollusks from Panama collected by the Allan Hancock expedition to the Galapagos Islands, 1931 - 32. Allan Hancock Publ. Univ. South. Calif. 2 (12): 177 - 245; plts. 18 - 23 (21 August 1939) Amer. Geogr. Soc. spec. publ. Surveys between 1873 and 1875, with additions to 1962 (chart 620) Dept. Navy, Washington, D.C. Page 364 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 Two New Species of the Genus Volva Ropinc, 1798 (Ovulidae FLeminc, 1828) CRAWFORD N. CATE 12719 San Vicente Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90049 (Plate 56) THE PURPOSE OF THIS PAPER is to describe two new species belonging to the genus Volua Ropinc, 1798; it will list and illustrate the more common Pacific species for comparative purposes, and will present the currently accepted synonymy. For further comprehensive detail of the family Ovulidae FLEmine, 1828, the reader is referred to ScHILDER, 1932. CYPRAEACEA Gray, 1824 OvuLwAE FLEMING, 1828 Syn.: AMPHIPERATIDAE SCHILDER, 1927 (em.) Ovulinae FLEminc, 1828 (Ovulini) FLemine, 1828 Volva Ropine, 1798 Mus. Bolten. 21 Type species: Bulla volua LinNaEus, 1758 Syn.: Radius Montrort, 1810. Conchyl. Syst., 2: 627 Type species: Bulla volua LinnaEus, 1758 Birostra Swainson, 1840. Treat. Malacol. 1840: 325 Type species: Bulla volua LinnaEus, 1758 (Phenacovolva) Irepae, 1930. Mem. Queensld. Mus., 10 (1): 85 Type species: Phenacovolva nectarena IREDALE, 1930 1. Voluva (Phenacovolva) birostris (LINNAEUS, 1758) Syst. Nat., ed. 10: 725 (Plate 56, Figure 3) Syn.: Ovula longirostrata SowErRBy ', 1828 Zool. Journ. 1828, 4: 160 The species is known to range into Japanese waters and throughout the Malayan Archipelago, from the Gulf of Tonkin, to Vietnam, to Siasi Island, to New Guinea, and along the east coast of Australia. The species appears to maintain a rather constant shell morphology, differing only as to length, and it can be recognized without much difficulty. From available information, it would appear to be most abundant on an unnamed species of coral (local collectors call it Alcyon-type coral). The shells seem to average about 41mm in length and 7.5mm in width at the body whorl and outer lip. ‘The specimen illus- trated here was collected at Cooktown, Queensland, Aus- tralia, living on the coral mentioned above. 2. Volua (Phenacovolva) brevirostris (ScHUMACHER, 1817) Ess. Nouv. Syst. Vers Test. 1817: 259 (Plate 56, Figure 5) Syn.: Ovule birostre Lamarck, 1810 Ann. Mus. Hist. Nat. Paris 16: 113 Ovula rosea A. Apams, 1854 Proc. Zool. Soc. London 22: 130 Ovula recurva A. ApAMS & REEVE, 1848 Voy. Samarang, Moll., 1848: 21; plt. 6, fig. 3 Cyphoma elongatum A. ApamMs, 1864 J. P. Linn. Soc. London 7: 96 Phenacovolva nectarena IREDALE, 1930 Mem. Queensld. Mus., 10 (1): 85; plt. 9, fig. 6 This species has a wide living range throughout the Pacific region. It is a rather common species along the East Asian coast and the offshore islands, including the Philippines, Taiwan, Ryukyu Islands, and the Japanese is- land chain, as well as the coast of mainland China; other- wise the distribution of this species is as far east as Hawaii, then south to the Cook Islands, and southwest into the Celebes-Sulu Seas. The shell possesses a charac- teristic shape, with sharply angled shoulders; a singular THE VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 4 [C. N. Cate] Plate 56 Figure 1 Figure 2 Volva (Phenacovolva) brunneiterma Volva (Phenacovolva) lahainaensis C. N. Cate, spec. nov. X 23 C. N. Cate, spec. nov. X 14 Figure 3 Volva brevirostris (ScHUMACHER, 1817) X 2 Biomed Figure 5 Volva (Phenacovolva) philip pinarum (Sowersy ?"4, 1848) x 24 Volva birostris (LINNAEUS, 1758) X 13 photographs by Jean M. Cate Vol. 11; No. 4 shade of beige-grey color; a shorter, broader shell, with shorter, sturdier terminal beaks and with a conspicuous white transverse band of color across the central dorsal area. The shell varies in size, with an average length of 29mm and an average width of 11.5mm at the body whorl and lip. The specimen illustrated was collected in 190 feet of water off Lahaina, Maui, Hawaii, living on black coral, the same habitat as one of the species de- scribed as new herein. 3. Volua (Phenacovolva) philip pinarum (Sowersy ™, 1848) Proc. Zool. Soc. London 1848: 136 (Plate 56, Figure 4) Syn.: Volva carpentert DuNKER, 1877 Malakol. Blatter 24: 75 Volua maccoyi TENIsoN-Woops, 1878 Trans. Roy. Soc. Victoria 14: 56 Volva haynesi SowErRsy '"', 1889 Journ. Linn. Soc. London 20: 397; plt. 25, figs. 1-2 This is one of the smallest Volva species to be considered in this report, with the shell averaging about 21.5mm in length and 5.5mm in width. The species seems to range from Japan south through the Ryukyus, Taiwan, the Phil- ippines, the east coast of Australia, and possibly into South Australia [Volua (Phenacovolva) exsul (IREDALE, 1935) is probably the same as V. philippinarum]. VeERco, of the South Australian Museum, recorded a specimen collected in South West Australia as Ovula philippinarum Sow_Ersy; it had been dredged from 72 fathoms, 40 miles at sea from Eucla. I have not seen this shell and therefore cannot ascertain the correctness of this identification at this time. The Philippine Islands seem to be the center of greatest abundance for this species. The shell is narrow, with an outer lip somewhat flaring anteriorly, with fine transverse dorsal sculpture; it varies in color from pale beige-white to pink. The specimen illustrated is from Kii, Japan. 4. Volva (Phenacovolva) lahainaensis C. CATE, spec. nov. (Plate 56, Figure 2) Shell narrow, elongately-ovate, subcylindrical, light in weight though strong; body whorl inflated, narrowing ab- ruptly toward the terminals; dorsum transversely sculp- tured with faint, parallel, zigzag embossed lines adapically and abapically, though lines do not zigzag anteriorly; ter- minals long, narrow, pinched laterally, both in front and in back, more so to the front; aperture narrow to the rear, widening, becoming openly constricted abapically; left margin rounded, not thickened, right margin on outer lip THE VELIGER Page 365 thickened, narrowly, sharply, abruptly formed, creating a sharp angle with the body whorl, thus becoming keeled into a distinct carina, which extends entire length of outer lip; fossula primitively formed, subconcave, slightly more so centrally; columella smooth, glossy, with a bifid (almost trifid) first funiculum adapically (see Carte, 1964: plt. 19, fig. 3); shell predominantly translucent orange in color, although the body whorl reflects an overtone of orange-grey; a distinct, deep, rich orange line encircles the shell at the margins, broken only by ter- minal openings, — on the right side enveloping the sharp marginal angle of the outer lip carina; untoothed, semi- sharp, adaxial edge of outer lip noticeably lighter in color in some specimens; interior of shell, fossula, columella, and interior of terminal channels rich orange color, funic- ulum a shade lighter. Type Locality: The specimen was collected alive on black coral in 190 feet of water off the southwest shore of the Hawaiian island of Maui; the specific area is referred to locally as “Lahaina Roads” (20°52’N Lat.; 156°41’ E Long.), which may generally be stated as being between Maui and Lanai. SCUBA divers brought the coral to the surface where this and other specimens were easily re- moved. It was sent to me for identification by Clifton S. Weaver of Lanikai, Oahu, Hawaii. Type Repository: The holotype will be deposited in the Bernice P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii; it will bear the Malacology Catalogue no. 217597. Discussion: The holotype of Volva lahainaensis is 31.2 mm long and 9.1 mm broad at the outer lip, and 7.3 mm high from ventral to dorsal surface. The shell shows a gently curving aperture, flaring, widening, then abruptly constricting abapically. To my knowledge there are be- tween 5 and 10 specimens known at present; all are from deep water habitats, and all have been collected from black coral. At the present time it is not known whether the species occurs elsewhere in this island chain; future discovery will determine the extent of its range. This new Hawaiian species appears morphologically distinct from other forms of Volva. It differs from another Hawaiian species, V. brevirostris (see Plate 56, Figure 5), by its lighter weight, narrower, less sharply angled shoul- ders, and slimmer overall appearance; by its lack of a central color band; by the intense, dark orange color; and by the presence of a deep, rich orange peripheral line bordering the sides of the shell. Also, V. brevirostris appears generally wider and shorter. Perhaps the most similar form would be that of the color variant of Volva brevirostris mentioned as living on the coasts of mainland China and Japan, reported as Ovu- la rosea A. ApaMs, 1854. However, its apparent strong Page 366 morphological affinity to V. brevirostris despite its pinkish coloring seems to separate the two forms. The new Maui species differs from V. rosea by being a narrower, more delicate shell; by the absence of the angulate shoulder; by the presence of the distinct funiculum, by the intense orange coloring, and particularly by the presence of the encircling orange line. 5. Voluva (Phenacovolva) brunneiterma C. CATE, spec. nov. (Plate 56, Figure 1) Shell delicate, though strongly constructed, well formed, elongately narrow; dorsal surface smooth (except for mi- nute, barely visible, longitudinal growth lines), untex- tured; funiculum absent; terminals minutely flaring; ap- erture exceedingly narrow, opening broadly at constric- tion of outer lip anteriorly; left margin not thickened, rounded; right margin without callus, lip flatly thickening adaxially, then rolling and curving upward within; fos- sula smooth, not impressed; primary shell color milk- white; terminal ends dark brown, with a pale brush of yellow-brown abapically the length of terminal ridge area. Type Locality: The specimen was found in the subtidal waters off Siasi Island, Sulu Sea (5°32’N Lat.; 120°52’E Long.). It was collected in 1960, and was sent to me by Mr. Fernando G. Dayrit, Manila, Philippines, for identi- fication. Type Repository: The holotype, a unique shell, will be deposited in the California Academy of Sciences Geology Department Type Collection, where it will bear the number 13161. Discussion: The holotype of Volva brunneiterma is 20.3 mm long, 4.7 mm broad at the left margin and outer lip, THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 and 4.2 mm high. This new species has been confused with V. philippinarum, which it vaguely resembles; however, it differs radically by being a narrower shell; by possessing a nearly closed aperture; by the compact outer lip (not flaring as in V. philippinarum); by having a smooth dorsal surface, although there are very faint growth lines longitudinally (as compared with the horizontally sculp- tured, evenly spaced lines of the latter species) ; by the outer lip being peculiarly crimped and constricted ante- riorly; by the dark brown coloring at the terminal ex- tremities. Because of the lack of adequate material, the distribution of this new taxon is at present unknown. The conspicuous dark brown terminals are a character- istic color feature in this species, providing a means for easily separating it from others. Therefore it seemed ap- propriate to use this distinguishing character as a basis for its specific name, which is derived from the Latin word brunneus (dark brown) and the Greek terma (for the shell terminals) ; hence the name brunneiterma. I want to thank Jean Cate for the excellent photo- graphic work, and Dr. Takeo Susuki for the film proces- sing. I also want to thank Dr. Franz Alfred Schilder for his considerations of the new species. LITERATURE CITED Cate, Crawrorp NEILL ¢ 1964. A new species of Primovula from the Philippines (Mol- lusca: Gastropoda) . The Veliger 7 (2): 102-103; plt. 19 (1 October 1964) ScHILDER, FRANZ ALFRED 1932. The living species of Amphiperatinae. Proc. Malacol. Soc. London 20 (1): 46-64; plts. 3-5 (78 figs.) Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Page 367 Zoogeographical Studies on Living Cowries FRANZ ALFRED SCHILDER University of Halle, German Democratic Republic (1 Map) Four years Aco I published a systematic list of species and races of living cowries with exact indications of the then known geographical distribution (ScHILDER, 1965). In the intervening 4 years several new cowrie species have been discovered and enthusiastic collectors have enlarged the knowledge of occurrence by filling small gaps in evi- dently continuous distribution as well as by slightly ex- tending the known boundaries of inhabited areas. However, in present times zoogeographers must be very careful in taking localities for granted even if the determina- tion can be checked; for since World War II soldiers and tourists often have thrown away shells in areas other than where they had collected them, seamen emptied ballast tanks on remote coasts, and dealers and natives indicated wrong localities to gain higher prices. Therefore the Central Pacific species collected as beach shells on the West Coast of Amer- ica have been rejected in the present paper as no living speci- men has ever been collected here. Even single living speci- mens cannot exclude the possibility of having been intro- duced by man (for references see ScHILDER, 1965, p. 171). The present paper does not consider often uncertain details but aims to give a survey about the general rules concerning the distribution of living cowries and to com- pare similar distributions in species of different descent and in taxa of different evolutionary status. Its aim is to encourage similar investigations in other groups of marine mollusca. TAXONOMY Species and subspecies have been treated in the same way as the classification of these taxa is often dubious and the rules of distribution seem to be hardly influenced by the present phase of evolution of species. Intraspecific taxa have been considered to be of subspecific rank (prospecies and subspecies) only if they are well sepa- rable by morphological characters without knowledge of the habitat of the specimens; infraspecies have been treated only if their distribution is discontinuous; clines and local mu- tants mostly have been ignored (see ScHILDER, 1966). The customary citation of generic names does not make clear the exact position of the species in Cypraeidae to a reader not well acquainted with the phylogenetical sys- tematics of the family. Therefore I prefer to replace the generic names by 3-digit numbers according to my paper on the generic classification of cowries (ScHILDER, 1968); the first figure indicates the subfamily, the second indi- cates the tribus (infrafamily), the third indicates the (in 1968 not numbered) genus; subgenera have been ignored so that 4-digit numbers can be avoided. The figures indicate the following taxa of living Cypraeidae: 4 Bernayinae 62 (Cypraeovulini) 42 (Bernayini) 622 Cypraeovula 421 Bernaya 623 Notocypraea 424 Zoila 624 Unmbilia 426 Siphocypraea 63 (Erroneini) 5 Cypraeinae 631 Erronea 51. (Cypraeini) 632 Notadusta 512 Trona 633 Palmadusta 513. Macrocypraea 634 = Bistolida 514 Mauritia 635 Ovatipsa 515 Talparia 636 = Cribrarula 516 Cypraea 7 Erosariinae 71 ( Pustulariini) 517 Lyncina = : 50 (meen) 711 Pustularia OME GEO aiaes 714 Propustularia BOE z d yp 72. (Erosariini) Case 721 Monetaria 6 _Erroneinae TOD Naan 61 (Zonariin1) 723 ~+Erosaria 612 Schildera 724 Staphylaea 613. Zonaria 725 Nucleolaria The citing of authors of specific names in the text might distract the reader’s concentration on the zoogeo- graphical facts; these names can be found in the ap- pended list of living cowries. ZOOGEOGRAPHICAL CLASSIFICATION There is a surprising symmetry in the natural arrange- ment of littoral territories with regard to the distribution of living cowries. Page 368 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 Hemispheres The boundaries between the western and eastern hemi- spheres lie in the eastern Pacific between Easter Island and the Galapagos Islands, about at Walvis Bay in South West Africa, and in the Suez Canal. They are never crossed by any living cowrie species. For the Indopacific 523 isabella and its West American rep- resentative 523 mexicana should be regarded as distinct spe- cies rather than as prospecies, and the pair 523 lurida (Med- iterranean) and 523 pulchra (Red Sea) is still far less allied each to the other, as these species belong to different sub- genera. Even on the generic level the hemispheral separation becomes evident as only 3 genera are common to both hemispheres, viz. 523 (Luria), 612 (Schilderia the Pacif- ic species of which possibly should be separated gener- ically), and 723 (Erosaria); 5 genera (425, 512, 513 613, 714) are restricted to the western hemisphere, whereas the remaining 21 genera live in the eastern hemisphere only. On the tribus level the separation of the hemispheres is much reduced as 6 tribes occur in both hemispheres and only 2 (62, 63) are restricted to the eastern one. All 4 subfamilies live in both hemispheres. Latitudinal Zones In both hemispheres one can distinguish a broad tropical zone along the equator and two less extended and usually less warm marginal zones accompanying it in the north and in the south. Many tropical cowries extend far beyond the equatorial zone into remote areas, while only few obviously northern or southern taxa have also been discovered in scattered locali- ties situated in the equatorial belt. In the two southernmost regions inhabited by cowries live 4 genera all species of which are restricted to these relatively cold waters. They are 622 (Cypracovula) in South Africa and 424 (Zoila), 623 (Notocypraea), and 624 (Umbilia) on the south coast of Australia. In these 4 genera there is a curious splitting into many allied sympatric species, Umbilia excepted in which the splitting into many south Australian species partially of unique features (624 gastroplax McCoy) took place in Tertiary times, as it was also in Zoila (424 platypyga McCoy, 424 gigas McCoy). Along the other borders of the territory in- habited by living cowries no similar unusual fauna will be found: the splitting of 613 (Zonaria) in Senegal and of 612 (Schilderia) in Japan is far less striking. Longitudinal Districts Moreover, in either hemisphere 3 longitudinal districts can be distinguished: a western, a central, and an eastern district. Their boundaries are caused by the present coasts of the continents. In the western hemisphere the 3 districts are distinctly separated with regard to the cowrie fauna: there are un- surmountable boundaries between West America, East America, and West Africa (the Mediterranean Sea in- cluded), as no cowrie species crosses the Panama Canal nor the half way line along the Atlantic. For the West American 513 cervinetta and the East A- merican 513 cervus can be well separated at least as pro- species, and the intermediate status of 723 spurca sanctaehe- lenae between the East American 723 acicularis and the West African 723 spurca needs confirmation. In the eastern hemisphere, however, the 3 longitudinal districts gradually pass each into the other as many cowrie species occur far beyond the borders of the western half of the Indian Ocean, the central district from Japan to Australia, and the small islands of the Central Pacific. There are plenty of species ranging from East Africa to Polynesia, but there are also many species limited to one of these 3 districts, e. g., 633 diluculum in the West, 633 lutea in the middle, and 517 schilderorum in the East. Central and Peripheral Regions From the combination of latitudinal zones and longitu- dinal districts a net-like pattern results in which a cent- ral region is surrounded by at least 9 peripheral regions in either hemisphere. In the more extended eastern hem- isphere the central region is far more spacious than the peripheral regions which look like appendices to the vast Indopacific region. The 4 corner regions (South Africa, Red Sea plus Persian Gulf, Tuamotu, Hawaii) are more important faunistically than the border regions between them, Japan and the south coast of Australia excepted. Among the many cowrie species which live across the tropical Indopacific from East Africa to Polynesia rather few species inhabit also the 4 corners — Natal, Red Sea, Tuamotu, Hawaii: 514 mauritiana, 515 talpa, 517 lynx, 517 carneola, 523 isabella, 721 moneta, 723 helvola, 725 nucleus; however, only 517 carneola, 523 isabella, 721 moneta, and 723 helvola reach the south coast of South Africa and the most widely spreading cowrie species 517 carneola reaches also the Per- sian Gulf, but none of them reaches the south coast of Australia (the most western parts excepted) nor New Zea- Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Page 369 land. The other widely spread species are absent in at least one corner region, or replaced there by closely allied, but well distinguishable species or races. In some species there is a tendency to produce similar clines along the whole periphery of the inhabited area. So, e.g., in 514 arabica (Scumper, 1961) and 516 tigris the general size increases distinctly from an Indopacific cen- ter to all border areas, and in 631 errones (SCHILDER & SCHIL- DER, 1968) several characters show gradual peripheral changes. CONTINUOUS DISTRIBUTION The primary mode of distribution of a monophyletic natural taxon undoubtedly is continuous. The inclusion of very small areas in which a taxon cannot live on account of unsuitable environments does not contra- dict the term ‘continuity of distribution’. Monotypic Taxa Continuous distribution can be observed in taxa restrict- ed to very small areas as well as in species which range from East Africa to Polynesia without developing mor- phologically distinguishable races. Examples of such Indopacific species are 514 mauritiana, 517 vitellus, 633 asellus, 634 teres, 721 moneta, 725 nucleus. In such species we have tried 30 years ago (ScHILDER & ScuiLper, 1938/1939) to distinguish widely distributed geo- graphical races (infraspecies) by the sum of variable minute characters; the distribution of these minor taxa is continuous and rather coincides with similar taxa separated by distinct gaps in discontinuous Indopacific species. However, as we have examined far more populations of these species for these 30 years, we now doubt the reality of many infraspecies and we consider them to represent indistinct clines at most. In some rare species the few known localities seem to be separated by larger vacant areas, but future research most probably will fill these gaps. So, for instance, 633 gracilis and 633 saulae evidently in- habit the same territory from Japan to Australia and from the Gulf of Bengal to the westernmost Pacific; within this terri- tory the common 633 gracilis has been found in 36 “areas” (according to ScHILDER & ScuiLpeER, 1965, p. 173, paragraph 6), but the rare 633 saulae sofar only in 13. The size of the inhabited territory of a species varies from 1 to 80 “areas” as distinguished by ScHILDER (1965, pp. 173-175, to which the area “54a: Auckland and North New Zealand, 10-16 centigrades” should be added). Many very rare species are known from one area only, and even 631 vredenburgi of which many hundred beach shells have been collected in southern Java, just reaches the border of a second area. The most widely distributed species is the Indopacific 517 carneola which inhabits at least 80 areas. Even if the arrangement of coasts and islands would allow a rather circular expansion of the boundaries of a species, the real distribution often consists in a rather narrow band longitudinally or latitudinally. Rather circular areas are inhabited, e. g., by 723 boivinii, 631 ovum, and 631 errones (all 3 in Malaysia, but with in- creasing diameter), 514 immanis (western Indian Ocean), 631 bregeriana (Melanesia), and 634 goodallii (Polynesia). Linear distributions are either longitudinal as in 613 robertsi in West America and 512 stercoraria in West Africa (both avoiding the off-shore islands), 631 felina and 723 margina- lis on the west coast of the Indian Ocean, 631 xanthodon in East Australia (common on the coast, rare on the off-shore islands, absent from Lord Howe Islands), 723 guttata on the west coast of the Pacific, and 725 granulata (cassiaui in- cluded) in Polynesia; or latitudinal as 426 mus along the north coast of South America, 723 gangranosa in the north- ern Indian Ocean, 723 maturata (marielae included) in the northern Pacific, and 636 fischeri on its southern border; the distribution of 631 pallida and 723 ocellata could be called more oblique as these species range from the Persian Gulf to southern Malaysia. Polytypic Taxa Continuous distribution is necessary in species developing clines especially in less warm areas (ScHILDER, 1966, p. 184). Thus 723 caputserpentis gradually passes from the tropics into the South-East-Australian cline caputanguis, 723 erosa in the same region into the cline pulchella, and 723 helvola into the South-African cline meridionalis. But continuous distribution often can be found also in species that can be divided into 2 or more morphologi- cally well distinguishable geographical subspecies or even in pairs of allied species constituting a superspecies (ScuiLper, 1966, p. 182) ; their territories are separated along a common boundary line which mostly runs longi- tudinally. This common case may be illustrated by pairs of allied taxa which have been arranged according to their boundary line being displaced from west to east (ScHILDER, 1965, pp. 173-175). The first named partner occupies the larger ter- ritory or is obviously the more primitive taxon, the second may be called peripheral; an asterisk (*) marks pairs of undoubted specific rank; for the inhabited regions see the appended list or more accurately in Scuttper, 1965 (pp. 176 to 183): Page 370 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 * 523 isabella/mexicana * 613 annettae/spadicea 513 cervinetta/cervus * 523 cinerea/lurida 723 acicularis/spurca 631 listeri/felina 723 redimita/lamarcku 723 erosa/nebrites 634 stolida/erythracensis 723 marginalis/ocellata 723 miliaris/redimita 631 pallida/vredenburgi 631 cylindrica/sowerbyana * 494 thersites/friendiu * 624 hesitata/armeniaca 631 subviridis/dorsalis 631 walken/bregeriana 633 humphreysiu/lutea 517 schilderorum/kuroharai kk OK Ox 723 marielae/maturata * 723 caputserpentis/caputdraconis * 723 scarabaeus/englerti 725 granulata/cassiaui Also the tripartite species can be added: 514 arabica/immanis/grayana 631 adusta/onyx/melanesiae However, in some pairs the adjacent territories do not meet along a common boundary line, but they distinctly overlap in a narrow zone, in which occasionally hybrids may be observed: * 613 zonaria/picta 613 pyrum/petitiana (hybrids? “senegalensis ScHiL- DER”) * 516 tigris/pantherina (hybrids) * 517 vitellus/camelopardalis * 723 lamarckiu/turdus 723 miliaris/eburnea (hybrids) Rarely is the continuous area of Indopacific distribu- tion composed of more than 3 taxa; on the subspecific level such series of taxonomic units may be classified as clines, but on a higher level they become real subspecies or even well separable species which replace each other along definite boundary lines or slightly overlap at their borders. In 523 isabella 3 clines and a border species can be distin- guished by the black terminal spots increasing from west to east: * isabella, lekalekana, controversa, and * mexicana. On the other hand, in the series 723 * lamarcku, redimita, * miliaris, eburnea the brown pigmentation decreases from west to east. The areas of peripheral species often become almost covered by widely spread central allies so that a very small corner remains for the sole presence of the former. So, for instance, 523 pulchra lives also in the Persian Gulf where the Indopacific 523 isabella is absent, while in the whole Red Sea both live side by side; 633 artuffeli extends in Japan farther to the north than its widely distributed ally 633 clandestina; and 634 subteres seems to be an analogous taxon in the Tuamotu Islands with regard to its Indopacific ally 634 teres. In rare extreme cases the area of the peripheral species has been quite covered by its widely distributed ancestor species, so that both become sympatric in the whole terri- tory of the former. Thus 513 cervus is restricted to the northernmost border areas of its ancestor 513 zebra, and 515 exusta is restricted to the southern Red Sea, while the Indopacific 515 talpa crosses it as far as Sinai. WAYS to DISCONTINUITY In some latitudinally or longitudinally tripartite species the two border taxa are more similar to each other than to the immediately adjacent central taxon; there is the question whether the two border taxa are farther developed in a parallel way than the older central taxon, or, on the contrary, the latter is the younger taxon arisen in the central area and pushing back the border halves of the original taxon. Morphological aspects seem to favor the latter interpretation. Such cases may be illustrated latitudinally by 633 gracilis of which the northern and southern clines japonica and ma- cula are hardly distinguishable, while the central gracilis is different at least statistically; the Mediterranean 613 pyrum and the hardly separable unique angolensis from southern An- gola are connected by the morphologically distinct tropical petitiana. Longitudinally the western 631 adusta becomes sep- arated from the very similar melanesiae by the central onyx differing in color, at least, and the western 635 variolaria from the eastern chinensis by the north Indian coloba. On the spe- cific level one could add 523 isabella between pulchra and mexicana, both with large terminal spots and brown pigment on the teeth or margins, respectively; and possibly also 514 eglantina between histrio and maculifera. The rare cases of several minor taxa of a species sur- rounding the often overlapping central territory occupied by another less closely related species may belong to the same category. The discontinuous races of 631 pulchella (viz. vayssierei, pericalles, pulchella, novaebritanniae) and of 723 cernica (viz. cernica, viridicolor, tomlini, maturata, marielae) seem to be grouped around the central territory occupied by 631 pyriformis and 723 labrolineata, respectively. In some few cases of now discontinuous distribution the at present existing gap can be filled by extinct an- cestors so that the distribution becomes continuous for the scientist familiar with both living and fossil species. Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Page 371 ee The rare Pleistocene 631 semicostata ScH1LpER from Java seems to connect the living races of pulchella just mentioned, and the recent pyriformis which is more frequently repre- sented in the same beds (propyriformis ScHILDER). The now discontinuous genus 613 (Zonaria) becomes continuous by considering fossil species, as the living species 613 zonaria (West Africa) and 613 aequinoctialis (plus annettae, both in West America) were connected in Miocene times by the East American 613 raymondrobertsi Pirspry and 613 bowdenen- sis Prtspry. Possibly one could add on a still higher level the 3 relic species of 421 Bernaya, viz. teulerei (Arabia), fultoni (South Africa), and catei (West Australia) which live about in corners of the eastern Tethys region occupied by their many Eocene ancestors in 421 (Bernaya); even 426 mus whose Neogene ancestors were widely distributed in North and South America could be regarded as a fourth corner relic of the vast distribution of 42 (Bernayini) along the Paleo- gene Tethys Sea. DISCONTINUOUS DISTRIBUTION According to the generally adopted rules of evolution and dispersion of all living beings there is no primary discontinuous distribution, as all taxa originated from single populations inhabiting a small continuous territory. Therefore the discontinuity is always secondary, in cowries 1. if members of a population have been displaced a) naturally in larval stages by currents, etc. or b) accidentally by man with his ships and hydroplanes to remote areas where the species could gain a footing; or 2. if the discontinuity is the result of extinction of con- necting taxa in past geological times. The discontinuity also may be apparent only if it is caused by still insufficient knowledge of recent faunas and if there is some hope to discover geographically connecting taxa es- pecially in the as yet less explored deep waters. The distribution of living cowries is rather well known, though future research undoubtedly will fill many gaps and correct many boundary lines. So the specialist is the more surprised by the relatively large number of evidently real discontinuities in distribution revealed by critical ex- amination of all available indications of habitat. Some isolated discoveries of single specimens often said to have been collected alive in remote areas will be excluded from the following considerations; they need further confir- mation, or may rely on specimens accidentally introduced by man. Such cases include 631 errones and 723 miliaris in East Africa, 514 maculifera, 517 nivosa, and 631 barclayi in Lemuria, etc. There are two prevalent directions of geographical discontinuity in living cowries: 1. latitudinal: two allied taxa live in the north and in the south of an equatorial belt in which no related taxon occurs; 2. longitudinal: two related taxa live in the west and in the east along the equatorial belt, but they are separated by a central region uninhabited by any re- lated taxon. Of course, latitudinal discontinuities refer only to pairs of taxa living in about the same longitudinal district. The only non-equatorial longitudinal discontinuity exists along south- ern Asia between 631 pericalles (Persia) and 631 pulchella (China). Latitudinal Discontinuities Some pairs of taxa, from allied species to hardly discern- ible infraspecies, live in opposite areas of the northern and southern zone without being connected geographic- ally by a related equatorial taxon. One could call this fact “bipolarity” in a broad sense, as it probably is caused by parallelism of the areas concerning temperature. There- fore one must bear in mind that future research may supply connecting links in very deep waters of the equa- torial zone. Such bipolarity has been observed almost only in 6 (Erroneinae). An accumulation of such “bipolar” pairs recently has been discovered to exist in the Japanese and East Australian faunas: 612 langfordi — moretonensis * 612 hiraset — queenslandica 631 hungerfordi — coucomi 631 piscatorum — subviridis * 632 katsuae — hartsmithi 723 maturata — tomlini but it occurs also in the central Pacific (Hawaii - Melanesia) : 634 latior — rashleighana 636 gaskoini — fischeri as well as in West Africa (Mediterranean - Angola) : 612 achatidea — inopinata 613 pyrum — angolensis (here the gap is filled by the less closely allied petitiana, see above) and in West America (Gulf of California - Ecuador) : 613 annettae — aequinoctialis. In a few pairs a northern or a southern taxon is re- placed by an allied cowrie in the equatorial zone; how- ever, as the boundaries of the equatorial partners are still uncertain on account of their rarity, these cases also may be interpreted as continuous distribution: 631 pulchella (China) — novaebritanniae (Melanesia) 631 xanthodon (East Australia) — fernandoi (Phil- ippines) 633 hammondae (Australia) — rayswmmersi (Malay- sia) one could add from the past: Page 372 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 * 424 friendiu (West Australia) — kendengensis ScuiL- DER (Pleistocene of Java) Longitudinal Discontinuities In many widely distributed taxa a distinct discontinuity between a western and an eastern branch can be observed, comparable to the north-southern “bipolarity” discussed above. This “bicentricity”, however, cannot be explained by climatic reasons, but we must suppose that a continu- ously distributed species has become extinct in its central territory so that the geographically separated halves even- tually could develop in different ways. In a few cases a slightly less closely allied taxon still fills the area between the two very similar border taxa or an extinct central taxon has been discovered as fossil (see above). In the western hemisphere the longitudinal range of species is too small so that such longitudinal discontinuity * 613 aequinoctialis (Ecuador) — zonaria (West Africa) ; the gap in East America is filled by Tertiary species (see above) . In the eastern hemisphere, however, many discontinu- ities have been discovered by accurate research on trust- worthy localities. These discontinuities occur chiefly in widely distributed pairs of rather common species sep- arating an Indian and a Pacific taxon. The central area devoid of any member of the pair is not identical in any of the cases, but it changes from India to Central Mal- aysia. In the following lists the vacant area has been named be- tween arrow heads ( > <) separating the first named west- ern taxon and its eastern ally. Such discontinuities occur on the infraspecific level, 1. e. the two partners cannot be distinguished morphologi- cally from each other; nevertheless one must expect that the partners separated for a long time have developed hereditary differences by different selection of genes, can be shown only in which possibly could be discovered by statistical methods: 631 amabilis > India < walken 724 interstincta > Andamans-Sumatra <_ limacina 635 variolaria > Ceylon-Borneo <_ chinensis 522 ingens > West and Central Malaysia < testudinaria 711 lemurica > southern Malaysia < children 514 dispersa > central Malaysia < depressa 723 poraria > central Malaysia < scarabaeus , 631 adusta > Malaysia <_ melanesiae The differences have been intensified to true subspecies level in: 514 alga > Maldives, India < mappa (incl. geographica) 633 notata > India < gracilis 633 chrysalis > India, Sumatra < microdon 631 pericalles > India, South Malaysia < pulchella 514 scurra > central Malaysia < indica Rarely pairs of equal specific rank occur: * 723 macandrewi > India to Celebes < becku * 514 histrio > Malaysia, New Guinea < maculifera To these examples of discontinuous distribution one can add 2 pairs of species, each pair living in restricted parts of the Indo- pacific: * 517 broderipu > Lemuria < _nivosa in the Indian Ocean and * 723 boivinit > Micronesia < ostergaardi in the Pacific Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Raversio SYSTEMATIC LIST These general observations may be followed by a system- atic list of living species, (p) prospecies, (s) subspecies, (c) clines, (i) infraspecies, and (m) local mutants (ScHIL- DER, 1966). The present list shows far less details in distribution than the list published 4 years ago (ScHILDER, 1965, pp. 176-183), but it isa clearer survey of the general distribution over the greater regions. These “regions” have been designated in the former list (Scumper, 1965) by 2-digit numbers and 3 capital letter- abbreviations; for augmenting the clarity in a more concen- trated table I now prefer to return to the 1-capital system used in a previous paper (ScuiLpER, 1941 with partially modified regional capitals and limits). As there are 30 regions at least, some capitals must be used twice; therefore the less ‘numerous regions of the western hemisphere have been print- ed in italics, and the western species have been marked with lok The following alphabetical list of regions contains the abbreviation (one capital letter), the name of the re- gion, and its former designation with 2 digits. The Map shows the boundaries of these regions. WESTERN HEMISPHERE A Antillean 81 H St. Helena 85 B Brasilian 86, 73 L Lusitanian 96 C Californian 89, 35 M Mediterranean 95 E Ecuadorian 87 P Panamic 88 F Floridan 82 S Senegal 83 G Guinean 84 EASTERN HEMISPHERE East African 18 South African 17 Dampierian 15 Erythraean 19 Fijian 46 M Malayan 48 N New Guinean 41 P Persian 12 Q Queenslandian 47 (including 54h = Lord Howe Is.) PoaHmoOAmMpaAS Guam (Micronesian) 42 R Rapanuian 45 Hawaiian 43 S Sumatran 14 Indian 13 T Tahitian 44 Japanese 49, 37 V Victorian 58 Z Zealandian 54 (h excluded) Lemurian 11 In the list of valid taxa of living cowries the regions inhabited by each taxon have been enumerated according to my previous arrangement (ScHILDER, 1965, pp. 173 to 175) as follows: CPEFABMLSGH CALEPISDVZQFNMJGTRH western ((_]): eastern: If it appears to be necessary to emphasize the restric- tion to a part of a region, the nine digits used in my former paper (ScHILDER, 1965, p. 171) will be used as exponents: Sie NW 2 N oa NE 8 — W ™ — central AOE 7 = SW 6—S§ SSE; The sign || marks greater discontinuities within the taxon. Page 374 CYPRAEIDAE Gray, 1824 4 Bernayinae ScHILDER, 1927 42 (Bernayini ScuiLpEr, 1927) 421 Bernaya JoussEAUME, 1884 teulerei (CAZENAVETTE, 1846) lp Je fultoni (SowerBy, 1903) C? catei SCHILDER, 1963 D’ 424 Zoila JouUSSEAUME, 1884 decipiens (Smiru, 1880) D” venusta (SowErRBy, 1846) D’ V® thersites (GasKotn, 1849) V' friendii (Gray, 1831) D’ Vv’ marginata (Gaskotn, 1849) DY WY rosselli (Cotton, 1948) We 426 Siphocypraca Herrin, 1887 [] mus (Linnaeus, 1758) A ¥) Cypraeinae Gray, 1824 51 (Cypraeini) Gray, 1824 512 Trona JoussEAuME, 1884 L] stercoraria (LinNAEuS, 1758) S*+G 513. Macrocypraea Scuitper, 1930 L] zebra (Linnatus, 1758) FAB [J cervus (Linnaeus, 1771) je “EC [] — (p)cervinetta (Krener, 1843) GP IP ja 514 Mauritia TroscHeEL, 1863 valentia (PERRY, 1811) Q? N? mappa (Linnaeus, 1758) D?Q? FNM J°GT —(c) geographica SCHILDER & SCHILDER, 1933 S —(s) alga (Perry, 1811) INE TL, TBP arabica (LinNaEuS, 1758) ISDQFNMJGT? —(m) gibba Corn, 1949 M® — (s) ¢mmanis SCHILDER & SCHILDER, 1939 CP AN IL grayana SCHILDER, 1930 AO 18, 12 IP eglantina (Ductos, 1833) S*>DQFNMJ°G histrio (GmeEtin, 1791) ALISD maculifera Scuitper, 1932 (L'?)||F'J°GTH depressa (Gray, 1824) He Neves le Gang — (i) dispersa SCHILDER & SCHILDER, 1939 AES mauritiana (LINNAEUuS, 1758) (Cz) PASIEN ES ISS DEO EeNe MiG alve Et scurra (GMELIN, 1791) AX Mb, IS THE VELIGER —(s) indica (GMELIN, 1791) QFNM*)°>GTH 515 Talparia TRoscHEL, 1863 talpa (Linnaeus, 1758) C A LE PS DO? FN Maia exusta (SOwERBY, 1832) 18 516 Cypraea LinnaEus, 1758 tigris LINNAEUS, 1758 CALE ES DO EN Mi ijcGeeG — (c) schildertiana Cate, 1961 Te pantherina SoLANDER, 1786 E 517 Lyncina TroscHEL, 1863 aurantium (GMELIN, 1791) FNMGT broderipu (SOWERBY, 1832) (Ee (Le?) nivosa (BRopERIP, 1827) (ie? TESS? leucodon (Bropverip, 1828) (14?) Ms argus (LINNAEUS, 1758) ALIS D OE MeGa portert (CATE, 1966) Mea lynx (Linnaeus, 1758) GAL ELS Di OQ FN MejsGwiar vitellus (LINNAEUS, 1758) GCALETSD V2 ZO FIN Maj Caria camelopardalis (Perry, 1811) E° reevel (SOWERBY, 1832) Ve ventriculus (LAMARCK, 1810) EN MM ¢ schilderorum (IrREDALE, 1939) FGTiH —(s) kurohara (Kuropa & Hasse, 1961) J sulcidentata (Gray, 1824) H carneola (LinNAEUS, 1758) GCALEPIS DZ OE NeMaiiGaiee —(m) titan ScHILDER & ScHILDER, 1962 A L’ —(m) leviathan (SCHILDER & SCHILDER, 1937) H 52 (Luriini) ScHILper, 1932 522 Chelycypraca SCHILDER, 1927 testudinaria (LINNAEUS, 1758) DIO_E N MesiiGal — (i) ingens ScHiLpeR & ScuitpeR, 1938 A'LI° 523 Luria JouSSEAUME, 1884 tessellata (Swainson, 1822) H pulchra (Gray, 1828) EP isabella (LInNAEuS, 1758) CALE TI — (c) lekalekana (Lapp, 1934) s) 1D) 22 (QO) Ja IN| WME J) © WE —(c) controversa (Gray, 1824) H L] mexicana (Stearns, 1893) GP IP? ja? [_] cinerea (GMELIN, 1791) FAB [] lurida (Linnaeus, 1758) IGE Ie SS (GE Sel Vol? 11; Now: ——— Vol. 11; No. 4 6 61 Erroneinae ScHILDER, 1927 (Zonariini) ScHILDER, 1932 612 Schilderia Tomutn, 1930 [] achatidea (Sowersy, 1837) M® [] -(i) inopinata ScuitpeEr, 1930 G® langfordi (Kuropa, 1938) J — (i) moretonensis ScHILDER, 1965 Q' hiraset (Roperts, 1913) J queenslandica ScHILDER, 1966 Q' teramachu (Kuropa, 1938) i midwayensis (AzUMA & Kurowara, 1967) HH? 613 Zonaria JousSEAUME, 1884 62 L] gambiensis (SHaw, 1909) S4 L_] zonaria (GMELIN, 1791) I We (G L] picta (Gray, 1824 ) S [_] sanguinolenta (Gmeun, 1791) St L] pyrum (Gmeun, 1791) M L S* L] - (i) angolensis (OpHNER, 1923) G® L] —(p) petitiana (Crosse, 1872) S* G' |] annettae (Dat, 1909) Gi _] — (p) aequinoctialis ScuttpER, 1933 E* L] spadicea (Swainson, 1823) (OR L] roberts: (Hmatco, 1906) GE IP 1d: [_] arabicula (Lamarck, 1810) GRBE [_] nigropunctata (Gray, 1828) E (Cypraeovulini) ScriLpEr, 1941 622 Cypraeovula Gray, 1824 fuscorubra (SuHaw, 1909) c* fuscodentata (Gray, 1825) Ce cohenae (Burcess, 1965) Cc’ algoensis (Gray, 1825) C® edentula (Gray, 1825) C amphithales (MELvILL, 1888) C capensis (Gray, 1828) C 623 Notocypraca ScHILDER, 1927 pulicaria (Reeve, 1846) Vv’ bicolor (Gasxoin, 1849) ve — (c) reticulifera (ScutmLpER, 1924) Vv’ — (s) occidentalis IREDALE, 1935 ve piperita (Gray, 1825) V OQ —(c) compton (Gray, 1847) ve —(m) casta SCHILDER & SUMMERS, 1963 \We declivis (SowERBY, 1870) Vv angustata (GMELIN, 1791) Vi 624 Umbilia JoussEAUME, 1884 armeniaca (VeERco, 1912) V' hesitata (IrEDALE, 1916) W253 @x THE VELIGER Page 375 (Erroneini) ScHiLpErR, 1927 631 Erronea TroscHEL, 1863 walkeri (SowerBy, 1832) SDOQOMJ@ — (i) amabilis (JoussEAuME, 1881) 1b —(p) bregeriana (Crosse, 1868) Fo Nt pyriformis (Gray, 1824) It'sSoDQ’M pulchella (Swainson, 1823) MES lor — (i) vayssierei SCHILDER & ScHILDER, 1938 E* —(s) pericalles (MELVILL & STANDEN, 1904) P® —(s) novaebritanniae SCHILDER & SCHILDER, 1937 LINE hungerfordi (SoweErRBy, 1888) J — (1) coucomi ScHILpER, 1964 Q' barclayt (REEvE, 1837) @? (2?) xanthodon (Sowersy, 1832) Q —(p) fernandoi Cate, 1969 M3 vredenburgi ScHILDER, 1927 S> M® pallida (Gray, 1828) PE S* M2 — (c) insulicola SCHILDER & SCHILDER, 1938 M® stohlert CATE & SCHILDER, 1968 M3 subviridis (REEVE, 1835) QF’ — (p) dorsalis ScHILDER & SCHILDER, 1938 D — (i) piscatorum ScHiLper, 1965 J onyx (LinNaEus, 1758) N° M J G —(p) adusta (Lamarck, 1810) A L™® PTI 8 — (i) melanesiae SCHILDER & SCHILDER, 1937 FY N* —(m) nymphae (Jay, 1850) 14 ovum (GMELIN, 1791) SDQ? NM f errones (LINNAEUS, 1758) (A?) | ISDQFNMJGT — (m) azurea ScuILpER, 1968 D' cylindrica (Born, 1778) SOQOFNMJG — (s) sowerbyana ScHILDER, 1932 D caurica (LinNAEuS, 1758) CPAC Es Pale SD OpkeNeMes Gaal felina (GMELIN, 1791) CAL’ —(c) fabula (Krener, 1843) 18? 12 —(p) listeri (Gray, 1824) eee? SD ES Nie Many «Gah? —(c) velesia (IREDALE, 1939) ve QO 632 Notadusta ScHILpER, 1935 punctata (LInNAEUuS, 1771) ALS DY OLE N May (Gan rabaulensis SCHILDER, 1964 N? katsuae (Kuropa, 1960) M? J hartsmithi ScHILDER, 1967 Q° martini (SCHEPMAN, 1907) —(p) superstes (SCHILDER, 1930) Fs Page 376 633 Palmadusta IREDALE, 1930 asellus (LINNAEUS, 1758) ALISDQFNMJGT clandestina (LINNAEUS, 1767) CALEISDOFNMJGT? artuffeli (JoUSSEAUME, 1876) J@ saulae (Gasko1n, 1843) S° || D Q M3 J G contaminata (SowERBY, 1832) c’Li|SsSDOFNM jf lutea (GmMeEtIN, 1791) (1°?) SD N° M J G° —(p) humphreysu (Gray, 1825) QF N* G ziczac (LINNAEUS, 1758) CALEPISDQFNMJ GT diluculum (ReEEvE, 1845) (CP AN 18? — (c) virginalis SCHILDER & SCHILDER, 1938 L lentiginosa (Gray, 1825) 1sy 1 II gracilis (Gaskoin, 1849) IS F' NMG —(c) japonica (ScuitpeEr, 1931) J —(c) macula (Ancas, 1867) re) — (s) trescens (SoweErRBy, 1870) D —(p) notata (Git, 1858) A’ E P hammondae (IrEDALE, 1939) Q N — (i) dampierensis (SCHILDER & CERNOHORSKY, 1965 ) D —(p) raysummersi (ScHILDER, 1960) mM” fimbniata (GMELIN, 1791) CALISSDFNMJG —(c) unifasciata (MicHELs, 1845) TH minoridens (MEeEtviLz, 1901) S || QFN MJIGT — (p) serrulifera SCHILDER & SCHILDER, 1938 T microdon (Gray, 1828) SOFNM J —(s) chrysalis (KieneEr, 1843) A’ L?® E# 634 Bistolida Cossmann, 1920 quadrimaculata (Gray, 1824) SDQFNMJG coxent (Cox, 1873) Fo Ns — (s) hesperina (ScHILDER & SUMMERS, 1963) Nrt 4 M3 interrupta (Gray, 1824) IS M*® pallidula (Gaskon, 1849) M G — (c) luchuana (Kuropa, 1960) J — (i) rhinoceros (SouverBiE, 1865) DQEN —(c) summers: (ScHILDER, 1958) F* rashleighana (MELvIL1, 1888) Fe — (s) latior (MELvILL, 1888) H teres (GMELIN, 1791) CALI SDQFNMJGTH —(p) subteres (WeEINKAUFF, 1881) ae goodallui (SoweErRBy, 1832) F3 G+ T kieneri (Hwatco, 1906) Agile Tc THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 —(c) depriestert (ScHILDER, 1933) SDQFNMJG — (i) landent (ScHILDER & GriFFITHS, 1962) T° owentt (SoweErBy, 1837) L —(s) vasta (SCHILDER & ScutLpER, 1938) CA hirundo (LINNAEUS, 1758) A LEISDQFNMJGT ursellus (GmMEtIN, 1791) SD QFNM J G@ erythraeensis (SOWERBY, 1837) E stolida (LinNAkEus, 1758) CALESDOEN MijgeGae 635 Ovatipsa IREDALE, 1931 chinensis (GMELIN, 1791) SDOFNM*jJGTH — (i) variolaria (LaMaRcK, 1810) CALE —(m) tortirostris (SowERBy, 1906) C —(p) coloba (MeEtvi11, 1888) lee | ISP 636 Cribrarula Stranp, 1929 cribraria (LINNAEUS, 1758) 1G a IOS DY WE O18 NW IME | G —(c) comma (Perry, 1811) (CP A IL? cribellum (Gasxkotn, 1849) A’ > esontropia (Ductos, 1833) Ls catholicorum (SCHILDER & SCHILDER, 1938) Oe aNe gaskoin (REEVE, 1846) H —(p) fischert VayssizreE, 1910) is (IEP) cumingu (SOWERBY, 1832) G: T Erosariinae SCHILDER, 1924 71 (Pustulariini) Scuiper, 1932 711 Pustularia Swainson, 1840 mariae ScHILDER, 1927 Q? F N M3 J’ GT H globulus (LinnaEus, 1758) rPSDQFNMJG — (i) brevirostris SCHILDER & SCHILDER, 1938 AuaE mauiensis (BuRGESS, 1967) H cicercula (LINNAEUS, 1758) ALE|SDQFNMJGT — (c) margarita (Dittwyn, 1817) FN MGT bistrinotata SCHILDER & SCHILDER, 1937 SDQFNMJGTH childreni (Gray, 1825) 1) IN| WWE J) Ge IP Tel — (1) lemurica SCHILDER & SCHILDER, 1938 1G (Q72) 714 Propustularia ScuiLpER, 1927 L] surinamensis (Perry, 1811) F° A B? Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Page 377 72 (Erosariini) ScHriLpErR, 1924 721 Monetaria TroscHEL, 1863 moneta (LINNAEUS, 1758) CALEPISDQFNMJGTH annulus (LINNAEUS, 1758) CALEPISDQFNMJGT — (c) obvelata (Lamarck, 1810) TS 722 Naria Broperip, 1837 irrorata (Gray, 1828) F? N? M?G T 723 Erosaria TRoscHEL, 1863 dillwyni (ScuiLpvER, 1922) F* (G?) T beckii (Gaskon, 1836) Q? N M‘J GT? H macandrewi (SoweErBy, 1870) E P® labrolineata (Gasxotn, 1849) Ss DQFNMJGH —(m?) ogasawarensis SCHILDER, 1944 G’ cernica (SowERBY, 1870) L* —(s) viridicolor (CaTE, 1962) D —(p) tomlini Scuitper, 1930 Z™ Q F* (T°?) —(s) maturata (Kira, 1959) JG — (i) marielae (Cate, 1960) H citrina (Gray, 1825) Cc A® (L??) L3 E° I S M® S* M gangranosa (Dittwyn, 1817) bowini (KiENER, 1843) ostergaardi (DALL, 1921) H helvola (Linnaeus, 1758) ALEISDV.QFNMJGTH —(c) meridionalis ScHILDER & SCHILDER, 1938 C caputserpentis (LInNAEUuS, 1758) GALE ISDZ7> QO FNMJGT —(c)kenyonae SCHILDER & SCHILDER, 1938 D’ V® —(c) caputanguis (Putprt, 1849) Q® — (i) caputophidi ScuiwpeEr, 1927 H caputdraconis (MELVvILL, 1888) R [_] albuginosa (Gray, 1825) GP 122 15 [] spurca (Linnaeus, 1758) MLSG L] - (i)sanctaehelenae ScuiLperR, 1930 H L] — (p) acicularis (GmeEuin, 1791) FAB poraria (Linnaeus, 1758) ASI SED — (i) searabaeus (Bory, 1827) 2ZOFNMJGTH englerti (SUMMERS & BurceEss, 1965) R erosa (LinnaEus, 1758) CALISDZ2OFNMIJGTH —(c) pulchella Corn, 1949 QO —(p) nebrites (MELvILL, 1888) IX 1S, Jet 12 ocellata (LinNaEus, 1758) EPs marginalis (Dittwyn, 1827) C A L? Et P® miliaris (GMELIN, 1791) (A?) |S) D Q N™» MJ G — (p) eburnea (Barnes, 1824) OFN lamarckii (Gray, 1825) CAL’? — (s) redimita (MEtvitt, 1888) L**? P+ I S?® turdus (LAmMarRcK, 1810) FXp 13, Ve —(c) pardalina (DuNkER, 1852) 1) — (c) winckworthi ScHILDER & SCHILDER, 1938 Pt guttata (GMELIN, 1791) F? N M? J G’ 724 Staphylaea JoussEauME, 1884 limacina (Lamarck, 1810) SDV OPE Ne May G: — (i) interstincta (Woop, 1828) OPN IAI — (p) semiplota (MicueEts, 1845) H staphylaea (LinnaEus, 1758) CALE SDOQOFNMIJGTH 725 Nucleolaria Oyama, 1959 nucleus (LINNAEUS, 1758) ALEFSDQOFNMJGTH granulata (PrEasE, 1862) H — (s) cassiaut (BurcEss, 1965) a te LITERATURE CITED ScuiLperR, Franz ALFRED 1941. | Verwandtschaft und Verbreitung der Cypraeacea. Arch. Molluskenk. 73 (2-3): 57-120; 2 plts. (15 May 1941) 1961. _A statistical study in cowries: the size of Mauritia ara- bica (Linnaeus). The Veliger 4 (1): 15-17; 2 text figs, (1 July 1961) 1965. The geographical distribution of cowries (Mollusca: Gastropoda) The Veliger 7 (3): 171 - 183; 2 maps (1 January 1965) 1966. Personal views on taxonomuy. The Veliger 8 (3): 181-189; 1 text fig. (1 January 1966) 1968. The generic classification of cowries. The Veliger 10 (3): 264 - 273 SCHILDER, FRANZ ALFRED, & MARIA SCHILDER 1938 - 1939. | Prodrome of a monograph on living Cypraeidae. Proc. Malacol. Soc. London 23 (3/4): 119 - 231; 1 fig.; 9 maps 1968. Studies on populations of the cowrie Erronea errones (LinnaEus). The Veliger 11 (2): 109-116; 5 maps; 6 tables. (1 October 1968) ScHILpER, Maria 1967. Length, breadth, and dentition in living cowries. The Veliger 9 (4) : 369 - 376; 1 diagram (1 April 1967) (1 January 1968) Page 378 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 Seasonal Observations on Diet, and Stored Glycogen and Lipids in the Horse Clam, Tresus capax (GouLD, 1850) BY ROBERT G. B. REID Department of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada (Plate 57; 1 Text figure) INTRODUCTION A sTUDY OF TWO BIVALVES, Lima hians (GMELIN, 1791) and Mya arenaria LINNAEUS, 1758 revealed the presence of fat globules in the digestive diverticula of these ani- mals (Rei, 1966). Although glycogen is generally re- garded as the major food storage compound in the Bivalvia, the fat contained in the digestive diverticula represents a significant amount of food energy. It was of interest therefore to undertake a seasonal study of the diverticular lipid as it related to lipid and glycogen storage in the gonad, which is the major organ of food storage, in the hope that the following questions might be answered: does the lipid of the digestive diverticula increase with an increase in food, or is it kept constant by the transport of excess lipid to the gonad? Does the diverticular fat represent a final energy store, to be de- pleted when the gonad glycogen and lipid are exhausted, or does the level of diverticular fat fall along with the level of glycogen and fat in the gonad? The seasonal availability of food was relevant to these problems and a study of the diet was undertaken along with stored food observations. MATERIALS anp METHODS Specimens of Tresus (=Schizothaerus) capax (GouLp, 1850) were dug at Esquimalt Lagoon, near Victoria, B. C. The average age of the animals was 4 years. They were collected at each spring tide over the period of a year, from July 1966 to June 1967. Adverse tidal and weather conditions made it occasionally impossible to collect, and sometimes limited the number of animals collected to two. The maximum number of animals sampled at any col- lection time was 6, though the general condition of the gonads of all the animals dug was observed. Bearing in mind the admonition of Mansour (1946) that digestion of some of the diet components in bivalves may be so rapid that any delay between collecting and examination of the stomach contents might give a wrong impression about diet, the stomach contents during the first few collections were examined on the beach, minutes after the animals were dug. It soon became obvious that a delay of many hours made little difference to the quali- tative aspects of the stomach contents, and subsequent observations were made in the comfort of the laboratory. The stomach contents of animals which were dug while still covered with several feet of water during the ebb of the tide were also examined to compare actively feeding animals with those which had been exposed to the air for some hours. Within 12 hours of collection of the ani- mals plankton samples were taken in the vicinity of the Tresus bed to determine the degree of selection exercised by the animals. Lipid from the digestive diverticula and gonad was estimated by the chloroform/methanol extraction method of ForcH et al. (1957). Glycogen was estimated by the anthrone method of ViILES & SILVERMAN (1949) after extraction with 5% trichloracetic acid at 90° C. The digestive diverticula were usually invested with gonad tissue and it was difficult to separate the two tissues completely. This problem was surmounted thus: a previ- ous histochemical study (Rem, 1968) indicated that gly- cogen is absent from the digestive diverticula proper. Thus the glycogen value obtained from the diverticula must have come from investing gonad. Therefore, applying the glycogen: lipid ratio obtained from the gonad proper, the % dry weight of lipid derived from investing gonad ——. Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Page 379 could be subtracted from the diverticular lipid value to obtain the true lipid value. It should be observed here that the histochemical ob- servation on Tresus diverticular fat included in the author’s 1968 paper was false, due to a technical mishap, but that the observations on the other species were valid. RESULTS Stored Lipid and Glycogen The results presented in Table 1 are graphed in Text figure 1, with different scales for average % dry weight lipid (left hand ordinate) and average % dry weight gly- cogen (right hand ordinate). Proceeding chronologically Table 1 Percent dry weight of gonad lipid, diverticular lipid, and gonad glycogen of Tresus capax, averaged for all individuals collected. * — sample lost through technical error] Date Gonad Diverticular Gonad Lipid Lipid Glycogen (corrected value) July 19 13.0 11.7 83.0 August 15 11.3 13.3 77.3 September 12 15.5 12.5 63.9 October 5 tS oe 63.9 November 16 14.0 9.5 52.4 December 1 15.7 S.0 44.2 December 15 18.0 10.2 33.2 December 28 13.3 10.2 3.2 January 9 13.7 10.6 3.4 January 24 11.8 8.8 10.4 February 7 14.2 8.3 19.5 February 22 13.3 10.6 19.8 March 6 8.1 10.0 2.8 March 23 8.7 6.5 6.8 April 13 12.8 7.2 lef April 27 9.9 12.1 18.8 May 10 10.4 11.7 16.6 May 24 8.88 10.6 20.6 June 10 12.7 9.9 9.3 June 24 11.5 11.7 60.1 a falling off in glycogen begins about the end of July, 1966, the curve steepens in December and rapidly falls to a minimum value at the beginning of January. Rising temporarily during February it falls to a new low which lasts throughout March and part of April. Then the glycogen content begins to rise, interrupted by a slight gonad glycogen Co oO o oO a ° average % dry weight glycogen gonad lipid digestive diverticular lipid 70 -_ oP OO WN wo ° tS) fo} average % dry weight lipid a ° yooAN S) © IW iD yp Pe SNe Months Figure 1 Graph of average % dry weight of gonad glycogen and lipid, and digestive diverticular lipid, in Tresus capax, over the period July 1966 to June 1967 dip in the beginning of May, to rise finally to the peak in July. Both digestive diverticular and gonadal lipid are fairly similar in their progress. However, during November there is a slight rise in gonad lipid to reach the highest peak of the year, while the digestive diverticular lipid falls slightly. Both organs reach a low in lipid content which coincides with the second low in glycogen content, recovering in step with the glycogen halfway through April. In May the gonad lipid drops along with the glycogen, but the lipid in the digestive diverticula shows less of a dip at the same time. Incidental observations on the general condition of the gonads of all the animals collected are included in Table 2, along with the diet observations. From these observa- tions it seems that individual animals vary considerably during the period December to March in the amount of stored material (i.e., in degree of fatness). Since an average of 4 animals only was sampled at each collecting time over the year it looks as if this number of animals is too small to make the individual differences insignifi- cant, and so the first low and the small peak in glycogen content during February is probably not indicative of the general trend throughout the population. Thus it is likely that a larger sample would have the glycogen content of the gonad falling smoothly from July to March. Diet Observations on diet and available phytoplankton are detailed in Table 2. Typical summer and winter stomach contents are shown in Plate 57. Naked flagellates are almost impossible to identify after exposure to the gastric juice of the clam, since they immediately become dis- torted and the flagellae are no longer obvious. Wherever Page 380 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 Table 2 Comparison of stomach contents of Tresus capax with available phytoplankton in the sea; notes on the general condition of the gonads of all animals collected Date Stomach Contents Phytoplankton not Ratio of fat: in Stomachs thin: depleted gonads June 20 Many Fragilaria; colonial Navicula; various diatoms; detritus 0 Cpe 75 6 (0) June 30 Mainly Fragilaria; detritus 0 T2210 July 18 Mainly Melosira 0 6:0:0 August 15 Various diatoms and flagellates 0 AS OO August 27 Melosira; Meridion; many flagellates peridinians 5:0: 0 September 1 Various diatoms 0 6:0:0 September 12 Meridion; Gomphonema; Melosira; many flagellates peridinians 4:0:0 October 5 Meridion; Gomphonema; Melosira; many flagellates Coscinodiscus 780) 3 November 2 Various diatoms; flagellates Coscinodiscus as 2 3 0 November 16 A few, varied diatoms 0 73-2073 5 (0) December 5 A few Melosira; flagellates Gyrosigma; Triceratium; Isthmia; 130 Chaetoceras; Coscinodiscus December 15 Mainly detritus As December 5 Os 23% December 28 Mainly detritus; a few varied diatoms; flagellates As December 5 Os 23 8 January 8 Mainly detritus; a few varied diatoms; flagellates peridinians; Coscinodiscus OFS eS January 24 Mainly detritus; a few varied diatoms; flagellates Biddulphia arctica 0:2: 4 February 7 Mainly detritus; a few varied diatoms; flagellates Biddulphia arctica Ose February 22 Mainly detritus; a few varied diatoms; flagellates 0 Oo a! March 6 Many Biddulphia aurita 0 Os 032 March 22 Various diatoms Chaetoceras OF aie April 15 Many varied diatoms 0 gl g 3 April 27 Many small diatoms 0 rece s al May 10 Many Fragilaria; Melosira 0 0:2:0 May 24 Many Fragilaria; Melosira 0 0:2:0 June 10 Many Fragilaria; Melosira 0 15250 June 24 Many, varied diatoms 0 sy 8 W possible diatoms are identified to genus and occasionally to species. In summary, there are a number of larger diatoms (with large cell bodies, or made effectively large by pos- sessing many long spines) such as Coscinodiscus, Chaeto- ceras, and Isthmia species, and Biddulphia arctica (BRIGHTWELL, 1853) which commonly occur in the re- gion of the clam beds, but which the animals do not in- gest, presumably because of their large size, being selected out and rejected by the sorting mechanisms of the mantle cavity. At times there are also large peridinian dino- flagellates which are available to the clams, and which would seem to be within the upper limits of the accept- able particle size (150 u), but which are not ingested, for reasons unknown. For the most part Tresus ingests all of the other smaller phytoplankton members, any bloom of a particular species being reflected by the stomach contents. Some time in November the amount of the food in the stomachs was noticeably reduced from the earlier part of the year, and from December to the end of February most of the particulate material in the stomach was inorganic or detrital. As early as March 6 the first phytoplankton bloom, of Biddulphia aurita (LyNcBYE, 1819) appeared, and the quantity of phytoplankton found in the stomachs gradually increased into June where it seemed to level off. Explanation of Plate 57 Figure 1: Stomach contents of Tresus capax, collected July 1966; various diatom species; flagellates Figure 2: Stomach contents of Tresus capax, collected December 1966; several flagellates; diatom frustules; Cristispira [ReEr] Plate 57 ba 5 7 S > a (<2) Q a > | rr i Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Page 381 The stomachs of all the animals examined contained a species of the spirochaete genus Cristispira. These bac- teria were most abundant during the summer. Currently work is underway to determine the role of the spiro- chaetes in the alimentation of Tresus. DISCUSSION When this work began the unwarranted assumption was made that adequate information would be available on the biology of Tresus. Unfortunately, most of the work on Tresus has been ecological, and the only relevant work is that of Swan & Finucane (1953) in which the authors imply that Tresus capax is a winter-spawning species. Dr. Quayle of the Biological Station, Nanaimo, in a personal communication informs me that the condition of the spat also indicates that T. capax is a winter-spawner. My lipid and glycogen analysis, together with the observations of gonad condition are only explicable in terms of T. capax being an early spawner, but it would have been more satisfactory to have done a seasonal histological study of the gonads along with the other aspects of the work. _ The preliminary questions which this work set out to answer are satisfied, with respect to this species. ‘The amount of fat in the digestive diverticula is relatively constant, falling from a summer level of around 13% dry weight to a winter low of about 8%. Thus fat stored in the digestive diverticula of Tresus can be re- garded mainly as an energy store which is called upon only after several months of food scarcity, during which time the glycogen store of the gonad is rapidly being depleted. How dynamic is the flow of lipid in and out of the storage globules is not known, and the transport mechanism responsible for moving excess fat from the tubule cells of the digestive diverticula is equally unclear, though amoebocytes may have a role in this transport as suggested by YoncE (1926). The lipid in the gonad fluctuates rather more. Of particular interest is the peak in mid-December which probably is related to the build-up of lipid in the forma- tion of eggs in the gonad. In a study of Crassostrea gigas (THunsErG, 1793) by Masumoto et al. (1934), reported in a review of the subject by Gopparp & Martin (1966), a similar lipid peak was observed during the period of “gonadal ripening.” This accumulation of gonad lipid probably occurs at the expense of both gonadal glyco- gen and diverticular lipid. The drop in gonadal lipid after mid-December is explicable as the release of eggs and the continued use of fat as an energy source. This peak cannot be easily dismissed as an artifact caused by the smallness of the samples, since the gonadal glycogen of the animals sampled is rapidly decreasing. The sudden drop in the level of glycogen occurs partly because food becomes noticeably scarce in November, and the glycogen is the major storage product. As well as the depletion of glycogen for the purpose of fueling the general metabolism of the animal, extra demands are being made upon this food store for the production of eggs and sperm. The re-accumulation of glycogen lags about one month behind the re-availability of phyto- plankton; the lag presumably reflects the increased en- ergy requirements of the animals for growth. After the middle of April the food available to the clams is in excess of all the energy requirements, and storage can rapidly take place. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am grateful to Miss Margaret Campbell who did most of the analytical work. This study was supported by a grant of the National Research Council of Canada. LITERATURE CITED Fotcu, Jorpi, M. Lees & STantey G. H. SLoaNE 1957. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. Journ. Biol. Chem. 226: 499 - 509 Gopparp, C. K. & A. W. Martin 1966. Carbohydrate metabolism. In: Physiology of the Mol- lusca, 2: 275 - 308 Acad. Press, New York & London Mansour, K. 1946. Food and digestive processes of the lamellibranchs. Nature, London 157: 482 Masumoto, B., M. Masumoto « M. Hrsino 1934. Biochemical studies of Magaki (Ostrea gigas). II. The seasonal variation in the chemical composition of Ostrea gigas. Journ. Sci. Hiroshima Univ., Ser. A, 4: 47 - 56 Rem, Rosert G. B. 1966. Digestive tract enzymes in the bivalves Lima hians (Gmeutn) and Mya arenaria L. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 17: 417 - 433 1968. The distribution of digestive tract enzymes in lamelli- branchiate bivalves. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 24: 727 - 744 Swan, Emery Freperick & JoHN H. FINUCANE 1952. Observations on the genus Schizothaerus. 66 (1): 19-26; plts. 2-4 ViLEs, FREDERICK J., Jr. « LESLIE SILVERMAN 1949. Determination of starch and cellulose with anthrone. Jour. Anal. Chem. 21: 950 - 953 Yonce, CHARLES MAUuRICE 1926. Structure and physiology of the organs of feeding and digestion in Ostrea edulis. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 14: 295 - 386 Nautilus Page 382 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 Seasonal Gonadal Changes in Two Bivalve Mollusks in Tomales Bay, California BY VERNON KENNETH LEONARD, Jr. Pacific Marine Station, Dillon Beach, California 94925 (Plates 58 to 60; 4 Text figures; 1 Map) INTRODUCTION Pododesmus cepio (Gray, 1850), A BIVALVE mollusk of the family Anomiidae, is native to the Pacific coast of North America and common in Tomales Bay, California. A small population of the European oyster, Ostrea edulis Linnaeus, 1758, is being raised experimentally at the Tomales Bay Oyster Company. The histological study of the seasonal gonadal changes of these two species, in Tomales Bay, is described below. The study of gametogenesis in Ostrea edulis in Tomales Bay is desired to evaluate the reproductive adaptation of this species to a new set of ecological conditions. The inclusion of the native Pododesmus cepio in this study allows comparison of the gonadal development of these two species. Such a comparison aids not only in under- standing the seasonal gonadal changes in both species, but also in examining the adjustment of the introduced form, O. edulis, to a new environment. At the present time the oyster industry in Tomales Bay imports large numbers of oysters bred in other local- ities and raises them until they reach marketable size. These imported oysters, the Japanese [Crassostrea gigas (THunNBERG, 1793) | and the American oyster [C. virgin- ica (GMELIN, 1791)], do not normally reproduce in California waters. The oyster industry in California would be revolutionized if an exotic oyster, such as Ost- rea edulis, were able to grow and reproduce in these waters. Knowledge of the reproductive cycle in Pododesmus cepio is valuable not only because it offers a natural com- parison to the introduced species, Ostrea edulis, but also because it would then be the first member of the family Anomiidae whose natural seasonal gonadal changes have been examined. There are no references to gonadal studies of Podo- desmus cepio. However, prior to 1953 (Fircu, 1953) P cepio was considered to be the same species as a very closely related form, PR macroschisma (DEesHayes, 1839). All available literature deals with this northern species. Kettoce (1915) described the gross morphology and ciliary currents of the mantle cavity of Monia (= Podo- desmus) macroschisma. FrizzELt (1930) published a note on the collection of a specimen of P macroschisma in a Teredo navalis (LinNaEus, 1758) burrow from Puget Sound. Brief references were also made to P mac- roschisma in discussions of the family Anomiidae by At- KINS (1937) and YonceE (1962). There are no works on the seasonal gonadal changes in any other member of the Anomiidae. In contrast, Ostrea edulis is one of the most thoroughly studied of all mollusks. Orton (1920, 1927, 1933, 1937), Core (1936, 1941, 1942), and Korrinca (1940, 1952, 1957) have studied many aspects of the reproductive cycle and sex change of the European oyster in its native waters. LoosaNorr (1955) introduced O. edulis to New England waters in 1949 and later studied the seasonal gonadal changes of these oysters while they were adjust- Explanation of Plate 58 Figure 1: Section of gonad of undifferentiated male Pododesmus cepio. Collected October 1966 X125 Figure 2: Section of gonad of undifferentiated female Pododes- mus cepio. Collected October 1966 125 Figure 3: Section of gonad of undifferentiated Ostrea edulis. Collected November 1966 X125 Figure 4: Section of gonad of developing male Pododesmus cepio. Collected February 1967 X 500 Figure 5: Section of gonad of developing female Pododesmus cepio. Collected January 1967 X125 Figure 6: Section of gonad of developing Ostrea edulis. Collected December 1966 X125 THE VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 4 [LEonarp] Plate 58 Figure 6 Vol. 11; No. 4 ing to the new environmental conditions (LoosANoFF, 1962). Three hundred European oysters were raised from lar- vae cultured in the U. S. Bureau of Commercial Fisheries Laboratory at Milford, Connecticut. With the assistance of Dr. Victor L. Loosanoff and the courtesy of the State of California, these oysters were imported to Tomales Bay in October 1965. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to thank Drs. Victor L. Loosanoff and Edmund H. Smith for their kind assistance and encouragement during this study. I also thank Mr. Carl Berg and Mr. Les Watling for aid in collecting the specimens. METHODS ann MATERIALS Sampling Methods About 25 specimens of Pododesmus cepio were taken monthly from a natural population in White Gulch, a small cove in Tomales Bay, California (see Map, Text figure 1). Samples were collected from October 1966 to March 1968. With each collection, water temperature, salinity, and turbidity measurements were taken. Samples of Ostrea edulis were collected twice a month at the beginning of the study and during the most active reproductive period (March to July), then once a month for the duration of the study. The sampling program ex- tended from October 1966 to December 1967. As with the White Gulch samples, temperature, salinity, and turbidity were measured at each collection. During the late spring and summer months, attempts were made to obtain larvae from the spawning oysters. To collect settling larvae, strings of cleaned oyster shells were suspended in the water around the racks in which the oysters were kept. Laboratory Procedure Each specimen was measured and the gonad examined externally for features, such as size and color, which might indicate its stage of development. The gonadal tis- tue was prepared for histological study as follows: trans- verse sections of the gonad, 1 to 2mm thick, were fixed in Bouin’s fluid, dehydrated in isopropyl alcohol and em- bedded in paraffin (melting point 52.5° C). Sections, 8u thick, were stained with Heidenhain’s iron hematoxylin and counterstained with eosin. THE VELIGER Page 383 California lg Pacific Marine Ke pu,; Station White Gulch | | 3 Q B . ~ ..Tomales Bay : i EON. “<9 Tomales Bay é pS TN Eke Onster 2 \ Company F 3286 KS ee ieee 2 : i BS boa: miles Figure 1 Map of the Study Area CRITERIA ror ESTABLISHING STAGES oF DEVELOPMENT After examination of the gonadal tissue, a number from 1 to 5, representing a particular stage of development, was given to each specimen. Each of these stages repre- sented a naturally occurring and characteristic change in the gonads of the animals during the entire reproduc- tive cycle. Stage I This stage represents the resting or indifferent phase through which Ostrea edulis and Pododesmus cepio pass Page 384 following the activity of the previous reproductive period (Plate 58, Figures 1, 2, and 3). In O. edulis, the gonadal tissue surrounding the digestive gland is reduced to a thin, translucent layer less than 1mm thick. The fine tubules connecting the follicles to the genital ducts can be seen through this layer. In P cepio, the gonad forms a layer of tissue partially covering the stomach and con- tinues anteriorly as an irregular tube attached to the byssus gland. During this period the gonad is clear, and the delicate genital tubules can be seen beneath the sur- face epithelium. The gonad of P cepzio is usually 2-3mm thick at this time. In both species the follicles are separated by connective tissue, often forming isolated pockets of follicular tissue. Usually the follicles are small and completely void of sex cells. However, primary germ cells are sometimes present and are attached to the follicular wall. The gonads of both species are colorless at this time; it is difficult to determine their sex. Stage II Early gametogenesis in Ostrea edulis and Pododesmus cepio is characterized by the development of primary and secondary oogonia, spermatogonia, and, in some advanced cases, oocytes and spermatids (Plate 58, Fig- ures 4, 5, and 6). The connective tissue surrounding the follicles supplies nutrient material (glycogen) for the developing cells (Loosanorr, 1942). As the sex cells proliferate, the follicles slowly enlarge and become more numerous. During early development all stages of gam- etogenesis can usually be found in one individual. Ostrea edulis often has male and female sex cells in various stages of gametogenesis in the same-or adjacent follicles. In general, however, mature gametes are not present at this time. Externally the gonads become opaque as the develop- ing cells fill the follicles. At this time the gonad of the female Pododesmus cepio has a faint red-orange color which becomes more brilliant as the animal ripens. Throughout their development, the gonads of the male THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 have a creamy white color, similar to that of Ostrea edults. The later stages of gametogenesis are characterized by the rapid increase in numbers of mature eggs and sperm. In Ostrea edulis, ripe eggs interspersed with oo- cytes line the follicles. In males and hermaphroditic in- dividuals, the spermatids and spermatozoa fill the lumen of the follicle. In this species the sperm characteristically form spermballs with the tails projecting outwards as in Plate 59, Figure 9. As the gonads of Pododesmus cepio ripen, eggs rapidly fill the follicle, with a corresponding decrease in the number of cells in earlier stages of oogenesis. Male fol- licles typically have primary stages of spermatogenesis in the outer portion of the follicle, with more mature sex cells occupying the lumen. In P cepio, the sperm are arranged in branching networks with their tails aligned toward the center of the follicle. Externally the gonads of both species become firmer and larger than during earlier stages. The color also becomes brighter, especially in female Pododesmus cepio. Stage III When fully ripe, both species possess large, character- istically swollen follicles containing mature gametes (Plate 59, Figures 7, 8, and 9). Developing stages of gameto- genesis are seldom present at this time. Ripe ova and spermatozoa are commonly found in the genital ducts awaiting discharge. Mature eggs in Pododesmus cepio often have a highly compressed appearance. The eggs are 60 to 75y. in size at this time. In Ostrea edulis, the eggs have a diameter of 85 to 90m but do not appear com- pressed. At this time the gonad of Pododesmus cepio attains its largest size, sometimes a centimeter or more in diam- eter. Ostrea edulis, however, never develops a thick gon- adal layer. In Tomales Bay, as in Boothbay Harbor, Maine (LoosanorrF, 1962), the gonad of O. edulis is rarely more than 14 mm thick. The ripe condition in the European oyster is obvious when the gonad is punctured, allowing the tightly packed gametes to be released. Explanation of Plate 59 Figure 7: Section of gonad of ripe male Pododesmus cepio. Collected June 1967 X125 Figure 8: Section of gonad of ripe female Pododesmus cepio. Collected June 1967 125 Figure 9: Section of gonad of ripe Ostrea edulis. Collected May 1967 X125 Figure 10: Section of gonad of spawned male Pododesmus cepio. Collected August 1967 X125 Figure 11: Section of gonad of spawned female Pododesmus cepio. Collected August 1967 X125 Figure 12: Section of gonad of spawned Ostrea edulis. Collected August 1967 X125 ora Tue VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 4 [LEonarp] Plate 59 Figure 11 Figure 12 Vol. 11; No. 4 Stage IV Examination of recently spawned specimens of Podo- desmus cepio and Ostrea edulis reveals large empty fol- licles (Plate 59, Figures 10, 11, and 12). Although a few unspawned gametes are often visible in the lumina of the follicles, no developing cells are present. In many cases, partially spawned animals will have empty fol- licles on the periphery of the gonad but fully ripe fol- licles closer to the digestive gland. Specimens of O. edulis commonly have cells of the next sexual phase undergoing gametogenesis in the evacuated follicles im- mediately following spawning. For example, a female phase may be completed early in the summer with a male phase beginning soon after the spawning of the eggs. The appearance of the gonads following spawning is dramatically different from the previous ripe condition. The gonads are greatly reduced in size, no longer firm, and usually void of sex cells in areas adjacent to the genital ducts. This shrunken condition is especially ob- vious in Pododesmus cepio. Stage V Ostrea edulis and Pododesmus cepio pass through a period of resorption following spawning, in which any remaining sex cells are absorbed by phagocytes (Plate 60, Figure 13). During this time the follicles of both species are small; the lumina are filled with phagocytes and fragments of partially resorbed gametes. Resorption is a slow process and often extends over several months’ time, thereby overlapping with the development of new gametes. GAMETOGENESIS It is appropriate to begin the description of gameto- genesis in Pododesmus cepio and Ostrea edulis with the inactive period (Stage I) following spawning and re- sorption. In Tomales Bay this period occurred during October and November, in both 1966 and 1967. The water temperature was 16° C over the O. edulis popula- tion and approximately 13°C in White Gulch (Text figures 2 and 3). The gonads of both species were typical- ly in the Stage I condition, undifferentiated and empty. During this stage the oyster usually had some primary germ cells attached to the follicular wall, while P cepio was completely barren. The duration of this indifferent period was similar for P cepio and the oyster (Tables 1 and 2). Early gametogenesis (Stage II) began late in Novem- ber 1966 and continued until April and early May 1967. THE VELIGER Page 385 Temperature °C ES 8 OENED EM pea Meare) Ay Ss” OFN De] br M 1966 1967 1968 Figure 2 Water Temperature at White Gulch, Tomales Bay, California, from October 1966 to March 1968 Although the water temperature in both study areas dropped to 12.5°C, each species had begun to show gonadal differentiation by early December 1966. The European oyster developed more rapidly than did Podo- desmus cepio. Ripe Ostrea edulis were found as early as December 1966, while a significant number of ripe P cepio was not found until April 1967. All stages of spermatogenesis and oogenesis were found during this active period. In both species, individuals were found lagging behind or developing more rapidly than the rest of the specimens of the sample. As the water warmed from a low of 9° C in January to 12- 13°C in March 1967, both species continued to Temperature °C = OENeDI Ee MyArMe J VAlS) OFNEDeI 1966 1967 1968 Figure 3 Water Temperature at Tomales Bay Oyster Company, California, from October 1966 to January 1968 Page 386 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 Table 1 Numbers of Pododesmus cepio in different stages of gonad development recorded at each collection; October 1966 to March 1968 See ta ce a aes Mae ae ass QQ Hoe eb gd 4 of BF ee 8 By 2 Se eB ef 2 S 8 BS Se eB BB Stage 8B Bg BSB) 9) ey SBS) ores) coe Oe es Ss ee 4s 48 85262-0242 46 Sea a 1966 1967 1968 rt A 1 Bi 6 210 12 iO in, 6 1 ih 1 1 2) WM Ge S Dn i 3 AO Si e316 IL. 3 AA MG Bf 4 10 8 8 IV. iO 22 op 10 4 Visi? VM IG SF Ml 12° 12 3 Note: The approximate duration of each stage is indicated by the blocks surrounding the numbers in the table above. Table 2 Numbers of Ostrea edulis in different stages of gonad development recorded at each collection; October 1966 to December 1967 Bes ame ze PAS ail sion rs! OB ea he ae 484 & 6a © 8 2 1966 1967 I. 10 9 1 4 3S) II. 220) 260) LOM Se t/a 1 1 III. 1 1 3. 2 8 ml 1 7 ie 1 2 vA Byes IV. 1 Do Bae 385 36 1 V. 1 1 1 tied a | 1 1 Note: The approximate duration of each stage is indicated by the blocks surrounding the numbers in the table above. Explanation of Plate 60 Figure 13: Section of gonad of resorbing female Pododesmus Figure 14: Section of gonad of hermaphroditic Pododesmus cepio. Collected November 1967 125 cepio. Collected November 1967 X125 Tue VELIcER, Vol. 11, No. 4 [LEonarp] Plate 60 Figure 13 x - Figure 14 Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Page 387 ripen, reaching advanced stages of gametogenesis in April. The fully ripe condition (Stage III) was not prevalent in Ostrea edulis until April 1967, when 30% of the sample attained this stage. Pododesmus cepio did not become fully mature until late May or early June 1967, although ripe individuals were observed in late March. During April the water temperature in both localities rose above 15° C, after which the gonads of both species ripened rapidly. The climax of the reproductive cycle of the two bi- valves in Tomales Bay (Stage IV) was reached during July 1967 (Tables 1 and 2). The duration of the spawn- ing period in Ostrea edulis was from May to September 1967, while in Pododesmus cepio it extended only from June to August. The period of most intense spawning coincided with the warmest water temperatures of the year, 19° C in White Gulch and 21.5° C at the oyster bed. Following spawning, each species entered a period of resorption (Stage V) during September and October of 1966 and 1967. Phagocytic cells were found within the lumina of the follicles, resorbing unspawned material. In Pododesmus cepio the phagocytes invade the follicles from the surrounding connective tissue, while in Ostrea edulis the phagocytes enter directly from the blood vessels (LoosanorF, 1962). The resorptive phase provides some nutritive material for the development of new germ cells. Resorption is a slow process, both in Tomales Bay and in Boothbay Harbor, Maine (Loosanorr, 1962), and often overlaps the early stages of gametogenesis in the next season, thereby completing the reproductive cycle. FACTORS AFFECTING GAMETOGENESIS Temperature Gametogenesis in Ostrea edulis and Pododesmus cepio is an uninterrupted process in Tomales Bay. Once begun in November, the development continued until the gon- ads were ripe in March or April. This uninterrupted development is unusual for Ostrea edulis. OrToN (1933) stated that O. edulis in England began rapid gonadal development in the early spring fol- lowing a period of hibernation (December to February). LoosanorF (1962), in discussing gonadal changes in O. edulis in Maine, noted that the oyster passed through a period of dormancy during the winter months and did not begin gametogenesis until April or May each year when the water temperature reached 10° C. In the Adri- atic Sea, O. edulis began gametogenic activity in the early spring and usually spawned by April following the period of winter quiescence (PERUSKo, 1967). Interrupted gametogenesis is common in several other bivalves. Crassostrea virginica is dormant during the win- ter in Long Island Sound and exhibits rapid gonadal development in May and June when the water tem- perature rises from 10°C to 12°C (Loosanorr, 1942). In Cyprina islandica, the ocean quahog of Rhode Island, gametogenic activity is slowed appreciably, although not completely arrested during the cold winter months (LoosanorFr, 1953). The hard shell clam, Mercenaria mercenaria (LINNAEUS, 1758), also passes through a winter period of reduced gametogenic activity in Long Island Sound (Loosanorr, 1937a). _ It is not surprising that Ostrea edulis should develop well and spawn in Tomales Bay, for the temperature range is probably more favorable than in its native Euro- pean waters. In Tomales Bay the water temperature dropped to approximately 9°C during December 1966 and January 1967, but rose above 15°C by April 1967 (Text figures 2 and 3). This “critical temperature” (Or- TON, 1920) was maintained or exceeded from May to October 1967, allowing 7 months for active gonadal de- velopment and spawning. This favorable temperature range no doubt accounts for the early and rapid matura- tion of the gonad of O. edulis in Tomales Bay. Many early workers, in studying lamellibranch repro- duction, discussed the existence of a minimum tempera- ture below which the bivalves could not successfully reproduce. Hopkins (1936, 1937), in his work with Ostrea lurida CARPENTER, 1864, noted that ripening and spawning of the oyster in British Columbia did not occur until the water temperature reached 15 to 16°C. Cor (1931b, 1932) found that when the water tempera- ture reached 15°C in southern California, O. lurida would spawn soon after. More recently, LoosANOFF & NomeyKo (1951) showed that not only is there a mini- mum temperature limiting reproduction, but oysters raised in northern latitudes would spawn at different times and different temperatures than individuals raised in warmer, southern areas. They found that actual physi- ological races existed in the same species grown in dif- ferent areas. Chesapeake Bay oysters would not spawn when transferred to the cold waters of Long Island Sound. Crassostrea virginica from Milford, Connecticut, however, would spawn earlier and at lower tempera- tures when transplanted in Chesapeake Bay (LoosaNoFr & NomMEjxko, 1951). Although no conclusive evidence is available regarding Pododesmus cepio in Tomales Bay, the indication is that a temperature of 15°C or higher is necessary for the ripening and spawning of gametes. A recent study has been made of the seasonal gonadal changes in Crassost- rea virginica and C’. gigas in Tomales Bay (BeErc, personal Page 388 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 communication). It was found that gametogenesis oc- curred in the spring, and that the gametes began to ripen in May and June after the water temperature reached 15° C. Likewise, Ostrea edulis began to ripen significantly when the water temperature rose above 15°C. This evidence suggests that, as with the Olympia oyster, O. lurida, 15°C may be the minimal temperature; below this temperature P cepio and O. edulis cannot spawn in Tomales Bay. Salinity The oysters were grown in wire cages suspended 1 foot above the bottom where the winter salinity never dropped below 22.5%. Although the surface salinities dropped below 5%, at the oyster beds, and below 11%, in White Gulch (Text figures 4 and 5), the development of the gonads appeared unaffected by the lowered concentra- tions. Pododesmus cepio occurs in the low intertidal zone, where the briefly lowered salinity (during February storms) could only be deleterious during extremely low OLNED IERIE Al Niji ANSE ONNID TmENN 1966 1967 1968 Figure 4 Salinity at White Gulch, Tomales Bay, California, from October 1966 to March 1968 tides. According to Davis & ANSELL (1958), develop- ment and larval growth of Ostrea edulis was normal at salinities of 22.5%, in Milford, Connecticut. Since the average salinity at the Tomales Bay oyster beds was 27 to 32%. for most of the year, it is unlikely that extremes in salinity adversely affected gonadal development. Hydrogen-Ion Concentration The hydrogen-ion concentration in both areas was re- markably constant during the study period. The pH ranged from 7.6 to 8.2. CaLaBrEsE & Davis (1966) found that oysters kept at a salinity of 27%, could toler- Surface Salinity 9 ' ‘ 6 Aut \ 3 = . ONDJFMAMJJASOND J 1966 1967 1968 Figure 5 Salinity at Tomales Bay Oyster Company, California, from October 1966 to January 1968 ate extremes in pH from 6.75 to 8.75. In most cases the oysters developed normal straight-hinge larvae. Since the observed pH in Tomales Bay was within the accepted tolerance limits, it is doubtful that this factor caused any changes in the gonadal development of Ostrea edulis and Pododesmus cepio. Turbidity Excessive turbidity most likely has a greater effect on both species, especially their larval forms, than lowered salinities. The author observed turbid water at Tomales Bay Oyster Company all year, with extreme conditions at times of peak run-off from winter and late spring storms. The White Gulch area was turbid only during and after heavy spring rains. In many cases during the summer spawning periods, the oyster shells would be covered with a layer of silt and mud several millimeters thick. Quantitative turbidity measurements made by Pa- cific Marine Station (Water Quality Study) substantiate these field observations. These data are available in the recent Federal Water Pollution Control Administration Progress Report (WP-GW-1061-02). It seems likely that excessive turbidity did affect larval development of Ostrea edulis in Tomales Bay. Although the animals developed and spawned normally, no larvae were seen by this investigator. Every specimen sampled during the spring and summer months was examined for the presence of larvae in the gills, but none were found. Similarly, Bere (personal communication), in his study of Crassostrea gigas and C. virginica, found only 4 or 5 bivalve larvae and a similar number of spat during the summer spawning period. Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Page 389 In addition to the high concentration of mud and silt observed, a large bloom of dinoflagellates occurred during July and August at the oyster beds. These turbid- ity-causing organisms, together with particles of silt, affected the oyster larvae by covering all available sur- faces with material, thus preventing any larvae present from settling. Moreover, the large concentrations of plant cells either removed nutrients from the water vital to the larvae, or released toxic metabolites causing mass mortality. Finally, CALABRESE & Davis (1966) noted that high turbidity could lower the pH, in some cases below the tolerance limit of the larvae, and cause mortality. While turbidity and related factors most likely caused larval mortality, there was less than 10% mortality among the Ostrea edulis adults. It is doubtful, therefore, that turbidity affected gonadal changes in the European oyster. In comparison, no significant mortality of Podo- desmus cepio larvae was observed; in fact, spat were found just a few weeks after the main spawning period in August. Sexuality Hermaphroditism in mollusks, especially in bivalves, is well known and has been thoroughly reviewed by Cor (1943, 1944). Orton (1927, 1933) established that Ost- rea edulis is a protandric hermaphrodite which passes through consecutive sexual phases. Examination of O. edulis in Tomales Bay revealed that the majority of the animals developed as functional females early in spring and, immediately after spawning, began producing male gametes. Cor (1931b, 1932) has described similar sexual phases in O. lurida and in the ship worm, Teredo navalis (LinnaEus, 1758) (Cor, 1941). Approximately 1% of the Pododesmus cepio examined was hermaphroditic (Plate 60, Figure 14). In 4 of the cases the animal had spawned as a male and still had undischarged sperm in the tubules; at the same time young ovocytes were developing on the follicular walls. In another case the animal had fully developed sperm and eggs. Over 95% of all animals under 40 mm (average of length and width) were male. This evidence suggests that Pododesmus cepio is protandric. In addition, the sex ratio of larger animals (55% ¢&, 40% 2, 4% unde- termined) indicates that some sex reversal must occur as the animal becomes older. As noted earlier, both P cepio and Ostrea edulis pass through an indifferent stage in which the sex cannot be determined. It is possible that during this period P cepio may change sex if the ap- propriate stimulus is present. CONCLUSION Seasonal gonadal changes in Ostrea edulis and Pododes- mus cepio in Tomales Bay took place in a continuous manner. Gametogenesis began in the late fall and con- tinued until the ripened condition was attained in the spring. Ostrea edulis began mass spawning in June, while P. cepio did not spawn until July and August. Resorption of unspawned gametes took place for varying lengths of time in each species following spawning. Prior to the onset of the next reproductive cycle, P cepio and O. edulis underwent a brief period of quiescence, during which time the gonads were generally undifferentiated. The temperature and salinity factors were favorable for the normal development and spawning of the imported European oyster. However, highly turbid conditions at the oyster beds appear to be responsible for the failure of Ostrea edulis to propagate in Tomales Bay. LITERATURE CITED ATKINS, DAPHNE 1937. On the ciliary mechanisms and interrelationships of lamellibranchs. Part III. Types of lamellibranch gills and their food currents. Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci. 79: 375 - 421 CALABRESE, ANTHONY & Harry Cari Davis 1966. The pH tolerance of embryos and larvae of Mercena- ria mercenaria and Crassostrea virginica. Biol. Bull. 131 (3): 427 - 436 Cor, WESLEY ROSWELL 1931. | Sexual rhythm in the California oyster (Ostrea lurida). Sci. 74: 247 - 249 1932. Development of the gonads and the sequence of the sexual phases in the California oyster (Ostrea lurida). Bull. Scripps Inst. Oceanogr. Tech. Ser. 3 (6): 119 - 144 1943. Sexual differentiation in mollusks. I. Pelecypods. Quart. Rev. Biol. 19: 85 - 97 1944. Sexual differentiation in mollusks. II. Gastropods, amphi- neurans, scaphopods, and cephalopods. Quart. Rev. Biol. 19: 85-97 CoLe, HERBERT AUBREY 1936. | Experiments in the breeding of oysters (Ostrea edulis) in tanks with special reference to the food of the larva and spat. Fish Invest. London Ser. ITI, 15: 1 - 28 1941. The fecundity of Ostrea edulis. Journ. Marine Biol. Assoc. U.K. 25: 243 - 260 1942. Primary sex-phases in Ostrea edulis. Parts Ili, IV. Quart. Journ. Microsc. Sci. 83: 317 - 356 Davis, Harry Cart & ALAN Davip ANSELL 1962. Survival and growth of the European oyster, O. edulis, at lowered salinities. Biol. Bull. 122 (1): 33-39 Fircu, JoHN Epcar 1953. | Common marine bivalves of California. Fish and Game, Fish Bull. 90: 102 pp. Calif. Dept. Page 390 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 FrizzELL, DonNALp LESLIE 1930. Pododesmus macroschisma DESHAYES. Nautilus 43 (3): 104 [for correction, see (4): 138] Hopkins, A. E. 1936. Ecological observations on spawning and early larval development on the Olympia oyster (Ostrea lurida). Ecology 17 (4): 551 - 566 1937. Experimental observations on spawning, larval devel- opment and setting in the Olympia oyster, Ostrea lurida. Bull. U.S. Bur. Fish. 23: 439 - 503 KeEttocc, JAMES LAWRENCE 1915. Ciliary mechanisms of lamellibranchs with descriptions of anatomy. Journ. Morph. 26 (4): 625-701 Korrinca, PIETER 1940. Experiments and observations on swarming, pelagic life and setting of the European flat oyster, O. edulis. — Arch. Neerl. Zool. T. V. 14: 1 - 249 1952. Recent advances in oyster biology. Biol. 27: 266 - 308; 339 - 365 1957. | Water temperature and breeding throughout the geo- graphical range of Ostrea edulis. Ann. Biol. 33 (1-2): 1-17 Loosanorr, Victor Lyon 1937. Seasonal gonadal changes of adult clams, Venus mer- cenaria (L.). Biol. Bull. 72 (3): 406 - 416 1942. Seasonal gonadal changes in the adult oysters, Ostrea virginica, of Long Island Sound. Biol. Bull. 82 (2): 195 to 206 Quart. Rev. Loosanorr, Victor Lyon 1953. | Reproductive cycle in Cyprina islandica. Biol. Bull. 104 (2): 146-155 1955. The European oyster in American waters. Sci. 121: 119- 121 1962. | Gametogenesis and spawning of the European oyster, Ostrea edulis, in waters of Maine. Biol. Bull. 122 (1): 86 - 94 LoosanorrF, Victor Lyon « CHartes A. NoMEJKo 1951. Existence of physiologically-different races of oysters, Crassostrea virginica. Biol. Bull. 101 (2): 151 - 156 Orton, Joun H. 1920. Sea temperature, breeding and distribution in marine animals. Journ. Marine Biol. Assoc. U.K. 12: 339 - 366 1927. Sex change in the European oyster. Journ. Marine Biol. Assoc. U. K. 14: 967 - 1045 1933. | Observations and experiments on sex change in the European oyster (Ostrea edulis). Part III. On the fate of the unspawned ova. Part IV. On the change from male to female. Journ. Marine Biol. Assoc. U. K. 19: 1 - 53 PeruSko, GiLiian H. 1967. A study of the gonads of Ostrea edulis L. in relation to its spawning cycle in the North Adriatic. Thallasia Jugoslav. 3 (1-6): 5-10 YonceE, CHARLES MAuRICE 1962. On the primitive significance of the byssus in the Bival- via and its effect in evolution. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U, K., 42: 113 - 127 Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Page 391 The Shell Structure and Mineralogy of Chama pellucida Broperip BY JOHN DAVID TAYLOR Department of Zoology, British Museum (Natural History), London AND WILLIAM JAMES KENNEDY Department of Geology and Mineralogy, Oxford (Plates 61 to 64; 6 Text figures) THE CALCIFIED SHELL OF THE BIVALVIA is normally built up of two forms of calcium carbonate, aragonite and calcite. Shells may be wholly aragonitic, or may contain both aragonite and calcite, always in separate monomin- eralic and structurally distinct layers. Amongst extant bivalves, calcite is confined to 7 super- families of the subclass Pteriomorphia (classification af ter NEWELL, 1965) and a single member of the Het- erodonta. This species is Chama pellucida Broverip, 1835. Primary calcite was also present in an extinct hetero- dont group, the rudists (Hippuritacea; KENNEDY «& _ Taytor, 1968). The distribution in living bivalves is: superfamilies Palaeotaxodonta: Nuculacea aragonite only Nuculanacea aragonite only Cryptodonta: Solemyacea aragonite only Pteriomorphia: Arcacea aragonite only Limopsacea aragonite only Mytilacea aragonite only or aragonite ++ calcite Pinnacea aragonite + calcite Pteriacea aragonite + calcite Pectinacea aragonite + calcite Anomiacea aragonite + calcite Limacea aragonite + calcite Ostreacea aragonite + calcite Palaeoheterodonta: Unionacea aragonite only Trigonacea aragonite only Heterodonta: All wholly aragonite, so superfamilies far as is known, ex- cept for Chama pel- lucida. Anomalodesmata: All wholly aragonitic The single occurrence of calcite in Chama pellucida, outside the Pteriomorphia, is therefore of considerable in- terest. This fact was first reported by Lowenstam (1954a, 1954b) and confirmed subsequently by him (LowEenstTam, 1963, 1964) and by our present work. In bivalve superfamilies where calcite and aragonite occur together in the same shell, LowEenstam (1954a, 1954b, 1963, 1964) and Dopp (1963, 1964) have shown that in some cases the proportion of aragonite is related to temperature. Species living in warmer water tend to have a higher proportion of aragonite in their shells than species living in temperate or cold waters. Chama pellucida is a West American species ranging from Peru to California. It thus extends into cooler waters well outside the normal range of the Chamacea, which are otherwise more or less confined to the tropics and sub- tropics. LowenstaM (1954b, 1963, 1964) was thus able to use Chama pellucida to illustrate the temperature ef fect on mineralogy. That is, calcite appears in a species which inhabits cooler waters than the other wholly aragon- itic members of the superfamily. Furthermore, he illust- rated (LowENstTAM, 1963, plate iv) the microstructure of the shell, stating that the outer aragonitic layer of the shell in warm water species of Chama is transformed to an outer calcitic layer in Chama pellucida. This layer has a distinct and different microstructure. During a general survey of the mineralogy and micro- structure of the Bivalvia (TayLor, KENNEDY & HALL, in press), we have found this interpretation to be incorrect. In view of the exceptional nature of Chama pellucida we present this more detailed study. METHODS Mineralogical determinations were carried out by X-ray diffraction on samples of the shell layers of 29 species of Page 392 Chamacea. The microstructure of the shell was examined at optical level by use of acetate peels prepared from pol- ished, etched sections (methods after KUMMEL & Raup, 1965). Petrographic thin sections were also examined. Fine structure was studied on shell interiors and on pol- ished and E.D.T.A. etched sections with a Cambridge Instrument Company (U. K.) ‘Stereoscan’ scanning elec- tron microscope. Two-stage formvar, gold palladium shad- ed replicas were studied by transmission electron micro- scopy (techniques from Kaye, 1964). OBSERVATIONS The shell of most Chamacea consists of two layers, an outer, crossed-lamellar layer and an inner, complex crossed- lamellar layer (terminology from Boccip, 1930, TayLor, KENNEDY & HALL, in press). These two layers are sepa- rated by a thin layer of a blocky prismatic aragonite. This is the pallial myostracum (OBERLING, 1964), and repre- sents the trace of mantle attachment at the pallial line, being deposited below the pallial muscles. It is the ‘pellucid layer’ of Japanese workers (i.e. KopayAsHt, 1964), the hypostracum of Jameson (1912), Lowenstam (1964) and others, and the ‘helle Schicht’ of many workers. When sections are cut through the muscle scars, thick pads of similar myostracal prisms are seen, forming thick adductor myostraca. Small areas of myostracal prisms occur else- where in the shell, and are discussed below. These relations are summarised in Text figure 1. In Chama pellucida there is an additional, outer layer, built of prismatic calcite. Within this there is a middle, crossed-lamellar layer, and an inner, complex crossed- lamellar layer, bordered by the trace of the pallial myos- tracum. These relationships are summarised in Text figure 2. Chama pellucida thus possesses an additional lay- er, not, as LowENnstAM (1964) states, a layer which THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 pallial myostracum e (RE outer crossed-lamellar layer inner complex crossed-lamellar layer adductor pallial myostraca myostracum Figure 1 Distribution of shell layers in Chama macerophylla A — section B — shell interior replaces the outer layer of wholly aragonitic species. The middle layer of C. pellucida is equivalent to the outer layer of other species of Chama. Explanation of Plate 61 Figure 1: The contact of the middle crossed-lamellar layer and the adductor myostracum of Chama radians. Acetate peel of a radial section. x 100 Figure 2: Radial section of the inner layer of Chama lamellosa showing complex crossed-lamellar structure and thin sheets of ‘my- ostracal type’ prisms. Acetate peel. X 100 Figure 3: Transverse section of the outer, prismatic calcite layer of Chama pellucida showing the large irregularly prismatic blocks with much finer units within. Acetate peel. X 100 Figure 4: Planar section of the outer prismatic, calcite layer of Chama pellucida. Sub-parallel finely prismatic units and growth bands are visible. Acetate peel. 100 Figure 5: Contact of the outer prismatic layer (above) and the middle crossed-lamellar layer (below) in Chama pellucida. Growth bands are continuous between layers. Crossed-lamellar structure is seen in the lower right hand corner of the picture, the transition zone between the layers is homogeneous and rich in organic matrix. Acetate peel. X 100 Figure 6: The inner complex crossed-lamellar layer of Chama pellucida showing myostracal pillars. Acetate peel. 100 Figure 7: Myostracal pillars in the inner complex crossed-lamellar layer of Chama radians. Acetate peel of a radial section. X 100 Figure 8: Planar section through the adductor myostracum of Chama lazarus. Acetate peel. Xx 100 Tue VELicER, Vol. 11, No. 4 [TayLor & KENNEDY] Plate 61 pa raha > 4 t ERR. Figure 8 Vol. 11; No. 4 inner complex crossed-lamellar layer outer prismatic calcite layer SS Nos WNOUGIAZ ss x eZ middle crossed-lamellar layer tm ( 4 & adductor myostraca ligament Figure 2 Distribution of shell layers in Chama pellucida A — section B — shell interior The structure of the various parts of the shell is de- scribed below. STRUCTURE OF THE CROSSED-LAMELLAR LAYER Conventional microscopy shows the inner surface of this layer as a series of elongate, branching and interdigitating lenses. These are arranged with their long axes running concentrically, parallel to the shell margins. These lenses are the first order lamels of Boccitp (1930). In sections, these lamels run normal to the inner surface of the shell layer, although often bending and turning towards the outer surface of the shell. They often branch and inter- THE VELIGER Page 393 digitate, producing a strong interlocking structure (Plate 64, Figures 20, 21). Thin sections and peels of this layer show a very strik- ing colour pattern, with adjacent first order lamels being either straw or red-brown in colour. Lamels may be up to several millimeters long, and are usually of the order of 0.5 mm wide. Sections of the um- bonal region show a characteristic pattern of diverging primary lamels. Internal structures of first order lamels are not easily resolved at optical level. It can be seen, however, that each first order lamel is built of second order lamels which are inclined to the shell interior, with opposed di- rections of inclination in adjacent first order lamels. Each second order lamel appears to be built of smaller laths, joined in side-to-side contact. Becke line studies reveal that the whole of the crossed-lamellar layer is an intergrowth of aragonite crystals in only two crystallo- graphic orientations. These observations are confirmed and extended by electron microscopy (Plate 62, Figure 12). These results are summarised in Text figure 3. Thus the whole layer can be seen to be built of minute laths, lying parallel within each first order lamel, and joined into sheets. These laths are up to 1m in diameter, and some tens of laths building up second order lamels’ first order lamels 2 CS ~~ PR adjacent: first 4 _ order lamels organic matrix Figure 3 Block diagram of crossed-lamellar structure, based on electronmicrographs Page 394 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 microns long. Etching reveals the presence of lace-like membranes within the crossed-lamellar layer; these cor- respond to the proteinaceous organic matrix well known in molluscan nacre and prisms. (GrecorE, 1967, with references. ) STRUCTURE OF THE COMPLEX CROSSED-LAMELLAR LAYER Peels and thin sections (Plate 61, Figures 2, 6, 7) show that this layer is built up of the same basic elements as crossed-lamellar structure, i. e., laths arranged into second order lamels. These are not arranged into lenticular first order lamels, but form irregular interdigitating blocks, with lamel attitudes similar within blocks, but opposed Civ = > Resse SSE Figure 4 Block diagram of complex crossed-lamellar structure, based on electronmicrographs in adjacent blocks. Sections show areas of granular ap- pearance between blocks which have a distinct lamel structure within them, and since this pattern is seen in sections cut in all orientations, we conclude that this layer type is built up of second order lamels inclined in many directions. Electronmicroscopy confirms these observa- tions (Plate 62, Figure 9), and also shows the presence of lace-like organic matrix within the complex crossed- lamellar structure. This structure is shown diagrammati- cally in Text figure 4. STRUCTURE OF THE PRISMATIC LAYER In hand specimens, this layer has a distinctive translucent, ‘pellucid’ appearance, and gives Chama pellucida its spe- cific name. The outer layer is projected into a series of irregular folia and squamae. At optical level (Plate 61, Figures 3, 4, 5) this layer has a grey appearance, and is built up of minute blade-like prisms, arranged more or less normally to the shell interior margin at the time of secretion. These minute prisms are variable in their atti- tude, and are arranged into longer irregular blocks. Under polarised light, these blocks go into extinction very irreg- ularly, and there is thus no uniformity of orientation within the blocks. This structure is markedly different from that of the calcite prismatic layer of most other bivalves, in that thick conchiolin walls are not developed between prisms. There is a variable relationship at the contact between the prismatic layer and the crossed-lamellar layer. The inner surface of the prismatic layer shows irregular cor- rugations arranged radially from the umbo which are im- pressions of radial musculature of the mantle. Over wide areas of the contact there is a marked discontinuity with a zone of fine-grained aragonite, rich in organic matrix (Plate 64, Figures 21, 22, 23). This fills up the underlying grooves in the corrugated surface. Elsewhere, minute angular calcite crystals project into the outer part of the aragonite crossed-lamellar layer (Plate 64, Figure 22). Explanation of Plate 62 Figure 9: Scanning electronmicrograph of a fractured section of the inner complex crossed-lamellar layer of Chama macerophylla. Parts of three blocks of parallel laths are shown, the inclination of laths in each block is different. 550 Figure 10: Scanning electronmicrograph of a polished, HCI- etched section of the crossed-lamellar layer of Chama pellucida showing sheets of fenestrate organic matrix. 1 400 Figure 11: The inner surface of a myostracal pillar in the inner layer of Chama macerophylla. Note the irregular form of the myostracal pillars and grooves between the prisms. Scanning elec- tronmicrograph. X 2 200 Figure 12: Fractured section of the crossed-lamellar layer of Chama macerophylla. The contact of two first order lamels is shown, the second order lamels and laths of each first order lamel are in- clined in opposed directions. Scanning electronmicrograph. X1 100 [TayLor & KENNEDY] Plate 62 THE VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 4 ° cD =] 3 ep ea Figure 12 Figure 11 Vol. 11; No. 4 The crossed-lamellar layer must thus grow over an angular irregular prismatic surface. Electron microscopy confirms these observations. Frac- tured sections show the larger prismatic blocks, with prominent transverse striations (Plate 63, Figure 16). These are obviously built up of smaller elements. On the inner surface of the shell layer, these blocks are not distinct; all that can be made out is an irregular surface of small pyramidal mounds and small granules (Plate 63, Figure 13). These correspond to the outcrop of the smal- ler prismatic units seen at optical level. Etching of sections brings out details not seen at optical level. Thus the fine prisms appear as elongate blocks, whilst oblique sections show their outlines (Plate 63, Figure 14). Etching also reveals the presence of organic matrix, as reticulate lace-like sheets surrounding the prisms. This organic matrix is heavily developed at the contact with the crossed-lamellar layer, whilst the matrix of both layers appears to be in continuity. STRUCTURE or tHE MYOSTRACA The myostracal structure of all Chamacea is very similar. At optical level it has a characteristic grey colour, strongly contrasting with adjacent shell layers. The structure is built of prisms, which are highly variable and irregular in outline, with re-entrant angles (Plate 61, Figure 8). Figure 5 Block diagram of myostracum based on electronmicrographs is not shown THE VELIGER | Page 395 These prisms vary greatly in size, but are always oriented normal to the surfaces of the myostracum, with crystallo- graphic c axes in the same direction. These relationships are summarised in Text figure 5. On shell interiors, my- ostracal prisms outcrop as minute irregular polygons. Pallial and adductor myostraca are rcadily understood, being secreted below areas of undoubted muscle attach- ment. In the Chamacca myostracal structure is also de- veloped as discrete sheets and pillars within the inner shell layer (Plate 61, Figure 2). Myostracal sheets of this type occur in some other bivalves, and we believe they may indicate sites of temporary mantle attachment, although conclusive evidence is lacking. Figure 6 Block diagram of myostracal pillars. The structure of the surrounding complex crossed-lamellar structure Pillar-like structures (Plate 61, Figures 6 and 7), which we propose to refer to as myostracal pillars, are developed in most Chamacea. In peels and sections these appear as elongate columns, with the long axis normal to the shell interior. Serial sections reveal that these are in fact sec- tions of continuous blocks of myostracum extending in- wards from, and continuous with, the pallial or adductor myostraca (Text figure 6). On shell interiors these outcrop as minute bosses usually 0.5 to 0.1 mm across, sometimes arranged in rows which radiate from the apex of the shell. Plate 62, Figure 11 shows the surface of such a boss. Here it is clear that there is a series of discrete prisms, Page 396 separated by grooves (of uncertain origin). There are also traces of finer structure visible within the prisms. Histological preparations of Chama jukesu show that the outer mantle surface is locally modified into papillae, as the result of elongation of the mantle cells. These papillae agree in size and shape with the myostracal pil- lars present in the inner shell layer of that species, and thus appear to represent the points of attachment. TUBULES The Chamacea all possess the remarkable shell feature described by Oxseruine (1964) as tubules. These are minute cylindrical perforations, usually only a few microns in diameter, which open at the interior of the shell and penetrate the shell layers. These are undoubtedly a pri- mary feature of the shell, not to be confused with algal borings or other perforations (OBERLING, op. cit.). The distribution of tubules is very constant in the Chamacea where they are largely confined to the inner shell layer. At optical level tubules appear as minute, hollow, un- branched, straight cylinders, cutting the finest observable elements of shell structure. At electron microscope level (Plate 64, Figures 17, 18, 19) the tubules are empty and unlined, and penetrate, but do not seem to disturb, shell fabric. Indeed, details of layering and fine structure are visible inside the tubule (Plate 64, Figure 18). The opening of the tubule is a distinct conical pit, and in some species of Chama, in- cluding C. pellucida, the tubules are grouped in minute oval depressions (Plate 64, Figure 17). THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 We have been unable to determine the origin of tubules. Since they occur more abundantly in older parts of the shell, and in some species of bivalve are absent at the margin, they may be resorptive, but histological work on decalcified material has revealed only the ambiguous tra- ces of mantle extensions into these holes. DISCUSSION anp CONCLUSIONS Chama pellucida has a shell structure which is compa- rable to that of all other species of Chamacea in many respects. It is, however, unique in possessing an outer, prismatic calcite layer. The middle shell layer is equi- valent to the outer layer of all other species; there is no change in microstructure as LoweNnstTam (1963) has im- plied; a new outer layer appears in C. pellucida, which thus has a three layered, not a two layered shell. It is also difficult to accept Chama pellucida as a wholly cold-water species of Chama, for it ranges across the equatorial belt. We would therefore question previous interpretations of the structure of Chama pellucida, and without further evidence would doubt the validity of using it as an example of environmental controls on shell mineralogy. This species is, however, quite unique amongst extant heterodonts in the development of calcite in its shell, and the significance of this is not understood. The calcite layer is, however, outermost, as is the calcitic shell layer in most other bi-mineralic bivalves. In common with Chama pellucida all other calcite bearing bivalves are epifaunal, or are derived from epifaunal ancestors. Explanation of Plate 63 Figure 13: Scanning electronmicrograph of the inner surface of the outer prismatic calcite layer of Chama pellucida. The outcrop of the minute prisms building up this layer are shown. 2 100 Figure 14: Polished, HCl-etched radial section of the outer pris- matic layer of Chama pellucida. Scanning electronmicrograph. X 700 Figure 15: Polished, etched section of the contact between the middle crossed-lamellar layer (above) and the pallial myostracum (below). Scanning electronmicrograph. 700 Figure 16: Scanning electronmicrograph of a fractured section of the outer prismatic calcite layer of Chama pellucida. Surfaces of larger prismatic units are visible, with distinct parallel, transverse striations. The finer prismatic units building the larger blocks are also visible. X 280 Explanation of Plate 64 Figure 17: Inner surface of the inner complex crossed-lamellar layer of Chama pellucida. The openings of six tubules are visible, four lie together in an oval depression, two are in separate circular depressions. Scanning electronmicrograph. 270 Figure 18: Detail showing the opening of a single tubule. Note details of fine structure within the hole and the lack of an obvious lining. Scanning electronmicrograph. X 2750 Figure 19: Fractured section of inner complex crossed-lamellar layer of Chama pellucida showing a tubule. Note the lack of lining and the absence of any change of structure associated with the tubule. Scanning electronmicrograph. X2 800 Figure 20: Radial section of the middle crossed-lamellar layer of Chama pellucida. Bands of myostracal prisms representing the pal- lial and adductor myostraca are seen. Acetate peel. X 100 Figure 21: Radial section of the contact between the outer calcite prismatic layer and the middle crossed-lamellar layer of Chama pellucida. Acetate peel. X 100 Figure 22: As above, showing details of the highly irregular contact. The calcite prismatic layer (lower part of field) projecting into the crossed-lamellar layer. Acetate peel. X 100 Figure 23: Radial section of the prismatic and crossed-lamellar layer contact, showing the irregular contact and an organic rich zone next to the prismatic layer. Thin section. X 100 [TayLor « KENNEDY] Plate 63 THE VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 4 Figure 14 Figure 13 tT > a = é S => & Se gl t ant * o es - a ; ae 4 me A wy ps . \ “< ~ oe “ 4 a ‘ er . we Ss N ¥ , a ¥¢ rf ‘ : ¥ wa | F > i 4 a 4 bags Ps ~ a ee re Ps 4 4 ~ * ‘ ‘ # e SAS id ~~ a ¥ - a Z “ - - f ef 2 f , ot ne 4° > ‘ s ‘ i P , 4 very a, id -. : Le . . re es Figure 16 Figure 15 Tue VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 4 [TayLor & KENNEDY] Plate 64 igure Figure 18 ee Figure 22 Figure 23 Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Page 397 An interesting comparison comes from the extinct het- erodont group, the rudists. These are derived from wholly aragonitic pachydonts such as Megalodon and Pachyrisma (Cox, 1960), but on assuming a cemented habitat, and de- veloping massive shells, calcitic outer layers appear. This cannot, however, be taken as evidence for affinity between Chamacea and Hippuritacea as NEwELL (1965) or YONGE (1967) have suggested. We also describe evidence for the local attachment of mantle to shell interior as demonstrated by the presence of sheets of myostracal prisms. Myostracal pillars and papillae on the mantle surface of Chama jukesu indicate continued attachment at localised sites with the pallial line throughout the life of the animal in this, and by inference, all other Chamacea. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We gratefully acknowledge the help of Dr. A. Hall (King’s College, London) with mineralogical determinations. We are also grateful to Mr. B. Martin and the staff of the electronmicroscope unit of the British Museum (Natural History), and Mr. R. Holland (Department of Geology and Mineralogy, Oxford) for technical assistance. APPENDIX A calcitic outer layer is also present in specimens in the British Museum (Natural History) labelled Chama exo- gyra ConraD, from California. Examination of the type specimens of Chama exogyra Conrap, 1837 and C. pellucida show that the specimens are distinctive. Chama pellucida is rounded in outline, ‘normal’ (i. e., attached by the left valve) and has striking translucent squamae. Chama exogyra is ‘inverse’ (at- tached by the right valve), irregular, elongate, and lacks conspicuous squamae. Other specimens of Chama exogyra show rather more conspicuous ridges and cementation can take place by the left valve. ‘Normal’ specimens of C. exogyra closely resemble C. pellucida and ‘inverse’ specimens of C. pel- lucida closely resemble C’. exogyra. The similarity of the unusual shell structure together with the similar geographical range (YoncE, 1967) of these two species, taken together with the problems of inversion in the Chamacea makes us suspect that these species may be synonymous. We believe that there is sufficient doubt of their valid- ity to merit a field investigation of their relationships. We hope that this note will stimulate workers in California to investigate the problem. LITERATURE CITED Boccixp, O. B. 1930. The shell structure of the mollusks. D. Kg. Danske Vidensk. Selsk. Skr., Naturv. Math. Afd., 9 R II 2: 231 - 325; 10 figs.; plts. 1-15 Cox, Lestm REGINALD 1960. Thoughts on the classification of the Bivalvia. Proc. Malacol. Soc. London 34 (2): 60-68 Dopp, J. R. 1963. Palaeoecological implications of shell mineralogy in two pelecypod species. Journ. Geol. 71: 1-11 1964. Environmentally controlled variation in the shell struc- ture of a pelecypod species. Journ. Palaeont. 38: 1065 - 1071 GréEcore, C. 1967. Sur la structure des matrices organiques des coquilles des mollusques. Biol. Rev. 42: 653 - 688 Jameson, L. H. 1912. Studies on pearl-oysters and pearls. I. The structure of the shell and pearls of the Ceylon pearl-oyster (Margaritifera vulgaris SCHUMACHER): with an examination of the Cestode Theory of pearl-production. Proc. Zool. Soc. London 1912: 260 - 358 Kaye, D. 1964. ‘Techniques for electron microscopy, pp. 1 - 381. Blackwell Scient. Publ., Oxford KENNEDY, WILLIAM JAMES & JOHN Davip TayLor 1968. Aragonite in rudists. Proc. Geol. Soc. London 1645: 325 - 331 Kosayasui, I. 1964. Microscopical observations on the shell structure of Bivalvia, part I, Barbatia obtusoides (Nysvt.) Sci. Rep. Tokyo. Kyoika Daig. Sect. C, 8: 295 - 301 KummMEL, B. & D. M. Raup 1965. | Handbook of palaeontological techniques. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco & London, xiii+852 pp. LowEnNsTaM, HEINnz A. 1954a. Environmental relationships of modification composi- tions of certain carbonate-secreting marine invertebrates. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 40: 39 - 48 1954b. Factors affecting the aragonite:calcite ratios in car- bonate-secreting marine organisms. Journ. Geol. 62: 284 - 322 1963. _ Biological problems relating to the composition and dia- genesis of sediments. In: The earth sciences: Problems and progress in current research: 138 - 195 1964. Coexisting calcites and aragonites from skeletal carbon- ates of marine organisms and their strontium and magnesium contents. In: Recent researches in the fields of hydrosphere, atmosphere and nuclear geochemistry: 373 - 404 Matong, PG. & J. R. Dopp 1967. Temperature and salinity effects on calcification rate in Mytilus edulis and its paleoecological implications. Lim- nol. & Oceanogr. 12 (3): 432 - 436 NEWELL, Norman D. 1965. Classification of the Bivalvia. 2206; 3 figs.; 1 tab. Amer. Mus. Novit. Page 398 THE VELIGER OBERLING, J. J. 1964. Observations on some structural features of the pelecy- pod shell. Mitteil. Naturforsch. Gesellsch. Bern, new ser., 20: 1 - 63; 6 plts.; 59 figs. TayLor, JoHN Davin, WILLIAM JAMES KENNEDY & A. HALL (in press) Shell structure and mineralogy of the Bivalvia: (Nuculacea — Trigonacea). Bull. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) (Zool.) YONGE, CHARLES MAUuRICE 1967. Form, habit and evolution in the Chamidae (Bivalvia) with reference to conditions in the rudists. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., B 252: 49 - 105 Vol. 11; No. 4 — Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Page 399 Molluscan Faunas of Pacific Coast Salt Marshes and Tidal Creeks KEITH B. MACDONALD! Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, California 92037 (1 Map) INTRODUCTION Paciric Coast Spartina - Salicornia salt marshes, and the tidal creeks that dissect them, contain distinctive mollus- can faunas. The taxonomy of most of the species repre- sented in these faunas is well documented (Frrcu, 1953; Paumer, 1958; Keen, 1958, 1963; Hanna, 1966) and in some cases papers describing aspects of the ecology of individual species, or of closely related species in other localities are available (e.g., HausEMAN, 1932; Mac- GiniTig, 1935; SanpErR, 1950; Yonce, 1951; Meyer, 1955; SELLMER, 1967). These faunas deserve further study, not only because they occupy habitats that are rapidly disappearing on the Pacific Coast, but because the huge species populations found at several sites may play an important role in the cycling of nutrients and detritus (organic debris) and thus indirectly affect offshore communities (NEWELL, 1965; CarrikerR, 1967; HepcpETH, 1967). This report outlines the geographic distribution and relative abundance of the species represented in these faunas. No previous studies of this subject have been found in the literature. METHODS Salt marshes and tidal creeks in 9 Pacific Coast bays and estuaries were examined (Figure 1). At 7 of these locali- ties single sites were sampled. Local spacial variations were studied by sampling 2 sites at both Tomales Bay and San Quintin Bay. Ten of the sites were sampled only once, each sample-set being collected over a 2-3 day period. To provide a basis for separating real latitudinal differ- 1 Present address: Department of Geology, University of Califor- nia, Santa Barbara, California 93106 ences from yearly population fluctuations, 5 replicate sample-sets were taken at Mission Bay, at approximately quarterly intervals (November 1964 to July 1966). Individual sites were selected for a minimum of pollu- tion and freshwater runoff. Isolated marshes that could be sampled as discreet units were preferred to artificially defined sections of more extensive marshlands. At each site the vegetated marsh surfaces and tidal creeks were sampled independently. For the former, stra- tified random sampling patterns were set up (CocHRAN, 1954). Random number tables were used either to locate samples at random intervals paced along previously sur- veyed relief transects, or, to select pairs of random co- ordinates locating the samples within quadrants of a prescribed irregular area. The molluscan data were collec- ted from stainless steel rings enclosing an area of 200 cm’; each sample was excavated to a depth of 1 cm. At 9 of the sites the tidal creek samples were located at random intervals paced along the creek banks; at Grays - Harbor and Mission Bay these samples were collected at fixed intervals. In most cases (cf. Table 2) the creek bottom mollusks were sampled from 25 25 cm quadrats excavated to a depth of approximately 25 cm. Upon return to the laboratory each marsh or creek sample was washed through a 1 mm mesh screen and all of its molluscan components were sorted, identified and counted (see Macpona_p, 1967, for additional details of sites and sampling methods). RESULTS ann DISCUSSION Seventy-six mollusk species were collected during this study; 64 of these were represented in the quantitative samples and the remainder were picked up during recon- naissance of the sites. In the samples, 2 species were represented by live specimens only, 28 species by both Page 400 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 Figure 1 North American Pacific Coast, showing the general location of the sites investigated living and dead material and, the remaining 34 species by empty shells only. Only the live material from the quantitative samples is considered in this report. The geographic distribution and relative abundance (i. e., percentage of total individuals, per sample set) of the mollusks represented in the live material are shown in Tables 1 and 2. Table 3 summarizes seasonal changes in the relative abundance of selected species in the replicate samples taken at Mission Bay. ABUNDANCE In sets of 25 - 178 samples, 2 - 7 species were found in the salt marshes and from 0-11 in the tidal creeks. The number of species increases significantly southward in the marsh environment (Kendall rank correlation procedure, P < 0.05, 1-tailed). There is similar increase in the tidal creeks, but largely because of the poor represen- tation of mollusks at San Quintin Bay (Keen, 1962), it is not significant (P > 0.05). The mean density of mollusks (i. e., total individuals per sample set/combined area of samples) and the mean densities of separate species in both environments show no correlation with the number of species recorded from each marsh or creek, or with the latitude or area of the site being sampled. This suggests that the abundance of mollusks at a specific site is controlled by a variety of local factors (sediment type, food supply, etc.) rather than by regional trends of climatic or oceanographic variables. The distribution of individuals between species exhibits a distinct pattern in the faunas of both environments: 90 - 100% of the individuals collected in each sample set belonged to 2 or 3 species; any additional species present were each represented by relatively very small numbers of individuals. Inspection of individual sample-sets also reveals that the abundant species were widely distributed at each site whereas the less common species had markedly patchy distributions. This pattern remains essentially the same despite differences in the latitude and area of the site and the species compositon and density of the faunas. SPECIES COMPOSITION The creek faunas usually contain more species and have a more variable species composition than do those of the marshes. In part this may reflect the more highly special- ized fauna of the latter, a marked contrast to that of the less extreme creek environments which contain a wide variety of species found in other barely subtidal habitats. Since a majority (83%) of the creek species are infaunal and thus subject to the selective effects of substrate (THorson, 1957; Purpy, 1964) the compositional vari- ability between sites might also reflect the variable nature of creek sediments. For example, at Tomales Bay shelly Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Page 401 Table 1 Salt Marsh Mollusk Faunas Species Composition and Relative Abundance (i. e., percentage of total individuals per site) Species 1 2 3 Gastropoda Littorina newcombiana (HEMPHILL, 1876) SUG 2:3 0.3 eae 7) 65.8 Assiminea translucens (CARPENTER, 1864) 9.4 44.0 33.9 Phytia myosotis (DRAPARNAUD, 1801) Batillaria zonalis (BRuGUIERE, 1792) + Cerithidea californica (HALDEMAN, 1840) Melampus olivaceus CARPENTER, 1857 Littorina scutulata Gou.p, 1849 Acteocina culcitella (Goutp, 1852) Littorina planaxis (Putvipri, 1847) Acteocina carinata (CARPENTER, 1857) Bivalvia Chione fluctifraga (SowErRBy, 1853) Mytilus edulis LinNaEus, 1758 Ostrea lurida CARPENTER, 1864 Lasaea subviridis DAL, 1899 Total individuals 553 300 693 Marsh area (km?) 0.237 0.071 0.056 Number of samples 50 59 40 “Localities as in Figure 1 + =present, < 0.1% individuals per site * — present at site but did not occur in samples + = introduced species, not native to the West Coast ** — common at other sites around Grays Harbor “ Mission Bay values obtained from combined replicate sample sets gravels were common, at Grays Harbor only coarse clean sands were present, at Coos Bay both soft muds rich in plant debris and firmer muddy sands were found and at the Humboldt Bay and San Quintin Bay sites almost liquid muds predominated. The geographic distribution of recurrent groups of spe- cies supports the classification of Pacific Coast molluscan provinces proposed by VALENTINE (1966). Within the salt marsh faunas the Californian (27° - 34° N) and Ore- gonian (34°-50° N) provinces are characterized by Assiminea - Cerithidea and Assiminea - Phytia associations respectively. The distribution of the more abundant tidal creek species suggests that the Oregonian Province can be fur- ther divided into 2 sub-provinces: the Macoma- Mya assemblage from Grays Harbor and Coos Bay, and rep- resented by in situ empty shells at Humboldt Bay, charac- terizing a northern sub-province; the Batillaria - Gemma (both introduced species) assemblage from Tomales Bay Locality ' 4 5 6 7 8A 9 10 11 64.1 7.1 45.0 35.9 8.8 55.0 93.2 68.6 79.3 76.0 5.0 84.1 * 5:9 a) 28:2) 200) = ee 5 087 019) 0.3 32.4 4 - AO. OF Be + 27.6 - 0.5 * * ileil 245 309 5246 2282 8 8§=—. 2153 852 362 809 0.111 0.046 0.104 0.886 0.139 0.060 0.019 0.099 49 20 45 60 100 50 20 50 and Elkhorn Slough characterizing a southern one. The Acteocina - Cerithidea association found in the tidal creeks south of Point Conception characterizes the Californian Province. LOCAL VARIATION Reconnaissance of different sites bordering the same bay or estuary indicates that the faunas of adjacent marshes or creek systems can vary considerably. Some of this vari- ation reflects the environmental gradients characteristic of estuaries: for example, Phytia myosotis was not found at Westport but was common at other sites well within Grays Harbor (Markham, Oyhut), perhaps indicating a preference for less exposed or more brackish habitats. Conversely, Littorina newcombiana was very rare at Ar- cata but reached densities of 16 to 48 per m? on Samoa Marsh near the mouth of Humboldt Bay, suggesting a tH 3 Zz b) Vol. 11 THE VELIGER Page 402 Table 2 Tidal Creek Mollusk Faunas: Species Composition and Relative Abundance Species Locality ! 1 2 3 4 5 6 i 8 9 10 11 Gastropoda Littorina newcombiana (HEMPHILL, 1876) 0.7 Batillaria zonalis (BRUGUIERE, 1792) + 92.2 63.9 43.0 Assiminea translucens (CARPENTER, 1864) 0.1 + Cerithidea californica (HaLpEmMaN, 1840) * 84.4 28.2 3.5 78.0 74.4 Acteocina culcitella (Goup, 1852) 11.5 68.7 29.4 22.0 Bulla gouldiana Pirssry, 1893 0.1 + Stphonaria brannani STEARNS, 1873 + Nassarius tegula (REEVE, 1853) 1.4 4.42 Bittium sp. 67.1 Acteocina carinata (CARPENTER, 1857) 19.4 Bivalvia Macoma inconspicua (BRopERIP & SOWERBY, 1829) 77.5 lee Mya arenaria LinnaEus, 1758 4.2 71.4 0.1 Cryptomya californica (Conran, 1837) 1.4 0.1 “3 Macoma nasuta (Conran, 1837) 16.2 + 0.6 o Laternula japonica (LiscHxKE, 1872) + 21.4 Gemma gemma (TortTEN, 1834) + 7.8 29.7 56.9 Modiolus senhousei (BENSON, 1842) + 5.3 ee 0.6 Protothaca staminea (Conrap, 1837) 0.6 2.8 0.2 Tapes japonica DESHAYES, 1853 + 0.1 Mytilus edulis LinnaEus, 1758 ae 0.1 oe Chione undatella (SowERBy, 1835) 0.4 uP Lyonsia gouldit Datu, 1915 + Chione. fluctifraga (SowERBY, 1853) 0.6 1.3 Tagelus californianus (Conrap, 1837) 0.3 0.4 Total individuals 142 14 0 490 1010 3179 720 5462 681 1496 227 Creek area (km?) 0.026 0.006 0.003 0.008 0.004 0.004 0.045 0.003 0.003 0.001 0.003 Number of samples 20 29 16 18® 5° 20° 15 78 10 4 10 ee — (000.0 ‘ Localities as in Figure 1 For explanation of symbols, see Table 1 B: sample size 312cm?; ©: sample size 400cm?; : sample size 200cm?; =: represented by Nassarius tegula tiarula (KIENER, 1834), a possible subspecies. Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Page 403 Table 3 Mission Bay Relative abundance of selected species in successive sample sets Salt marsh Assiminea translucens (CARPENTER, 1864) Cerithidea californica (HaLpEmAN, 1840) Acteocina culcitella (GouLp, 1852) Melampus olivaceus CARPENTER, 1857 Tidal creek Acteocina culcitella (CARPENTER, 1864) Cerithidea californica (HaLtpEMAN, 1840) Nassarius tegula (REEvE, 1853) A B Cc D E 4.9 0 0 0.2 77.0, 45.7 66.5 85.4 61.1 19.9 50.0 30.4 13.0 35.9 1.8 Zl 0.2 0.2 Nees A — November 1964 (marsh samples hand-picked in the field, data found unreliable) B — July 1965; © — October 1965; E = July 1966 preference for less brackish environments. Data from Tomales Bay and San Quintin Bay suggest that differences of drainage pattern, substrate or vegeta- tion can also account for local variability. The dominance of Bittium in the creek fauna of one of the San Quintin sites (10), for example, reflects the presence of dense Zostera (Eel-grass) beds, absent from the other site (9). Similarly, much of Millerton’s (5) diverse fauna was collected from a network of narrow protected creeks with soft mud bottoms, while at Walker Creek (4) exposed, deep-water creeks with gravel bottoms were sampled. Possibly the highly dissected nature of the Millerton marsh also allowed Batillaria to remain closer to water sources and successfully colonize the marsh surface while it did not do so at either Walker Creek or Moss Landing (6). SEASONALITY Data from replicate samples taken at Mission Bay (‘Table 3) suggest that the relative proportions of the more abun- dant species remain generally similar throughout the year. Changes noted among the less common species prob- ably reflect the sampling problems associated with rare or accidental species ( e. g., Bulla gouldiana, Littorina plan- axis, Siphonaria brannani), or with patchily distributed species (c. g., Index of Dispersion indicated that all the bivalve species were aggregated), rather than real com- positional differences. Seasonality was noted in Melampus olivaceus and Nas- sarius tegula. The former exhibited hibernation behavior similar to that described in M. bidentatus (HAUSEMAN, 1932) and was generally absent from the marsh surface D = March 1966; from about November through March. During this period many individuals were found clustered together in crab burrows 5-10cm beneath the surface. Nassarius ap- peared to be a seasonal migrant into creek habitats rather than a permanent resident; January, March and October samples showed individuals to be restricted to the creek mouth, while in July they extended well upstream. The apparent seasonality of Acteocina in the marsh fauna marked the establishment of small temporary populations from larvae accidentally washed ashore. Several new species records and range extensions have been noted during this study. For example, Laternula is not a native West Coast genus and the occurrence of Laternula sp., cf. L. japonica (LiscHKe) at Pony Slough, Coos Bay, Oregon, is the first known record of this species from the North American Pacific Coast. Occurrences of Modiolus senhousei (BENSON) at Elkhorn Slough and Mission Bay represent a considerable southward extension of the previously known West Coast range (36° to 48° N, Hanna, 1966) of this introduced species. The occurrence at Mission Bay of Siphonaria brannani STEARNS, previ- ously known only from a single site near Santa Barbara (34° N; Keen, 1937), also represents a range extension. Several of the salt marsh gastropods, Assiminea trans- lucens (CARPENTER), Phytia myosotis (DRAPARNAUD) and Littorina newcombiana (HEMPHILL) were previously known only from scattered localities (TRvon, 1865; Hemp- HILL, 1876; BartscH, 1920; Pautson, 1957; Duccan, 1965; Hanna, 1966) ; this study indicates that in fact these species are widely distributed on most marine marshes between latitudes 25° to 48° N, 35° to 49° N, and 41° to 47° N, respectively. Page 404 SUMMARY Quantitative sampling at 11 sites between latitudes 27° to 48° N reveals that the molluscan faunas of Pacific Coast salt marshes and tidal creeks have a characteristic struc- ture. At each site onc or two species are widely distributed and very abundant; additional species are all represented by small numbers of very patchily distributed individuals. The creek faunas usually contain more species and have a more variable species composition than do the marsh faunas. The geographic distribution of recurrent species groups supports the classification of Pacific Coast molluscan provinces proposed by VALENTINE (1966). There are some indications that both environments in the Californi- an Province (27° - 34° N) contain a greater variety of species than do similar environments in the Oregonian Province (34° - 50° N). Now that the general composition of these faunas is known, their community interrelationships and ecological significance can be assessed through experimental studies of their more common species. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Financial support was made available through the Scripps Institution of Oceanography and the United States Steel Research Fund. I wish to thank E. W. Fager for his advice and encouragement throughout this study. Identifications of the molluscan material were confirmed by: E. P. Chace (Natural History Museum, San Diego), A. Myra Keen (Stanford University) , R. Stohler (University of Cali- fornia, Berkeley) and D. W. Taylor (U.S.G.S., Menlo Park, California). LITERATURE CITED BartscH, PauL 1920. The West American mollusks of the families Rissoellidae and Synceratidae, and the rissoid genus Barleeia. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 58 (2331): 159-176; plts. 12, 13 (9 November 1920) CarrRIKER, MELBOURNE ROMAINE 1967. Ecology of estuarine benthic invertebrates: A perspec- tive. pp. 442-487 In: G.H.Laurr (ed.) Estuaries, Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci., Washington Cocuran, W. A. et al. 1954. _— Principles of sampling. 49: 13 - 35 Journ. Amer. Stat. Assoc. THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 Duccan, ELEANor P. 1963. Report of non-indigenous marine shells collected in the State of Washington. The Veliger 6 (2): 112 (1 October 1963) Fircu, Joun Epcar 1953. Common marine hivalves of California. Calif. Dept. Fish & Game Bull. 90: 102 pp.; illust. Hanna, G DALias 1966. Introduced mollusks of western North America. Occ. Pap. Calif: Acad. Sci. no, 48: 108 pp.; 85 figs.; 4 polis. (16 February 1966) Hauseman, S. A. 1932. A contribution to the ecology of the salt-marsh snail, Melampus bidentatus Say. Amer. Naturalist 66: 541 - 545 HepcpPetTH, JoeL W. 1967. The sense of the meeting. pp. 707-710 In: G. H. LaurF (ed.), Estuaries. Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci., Washington HEMPHILL, HENRY 1876. Description of a new California mollusc. Acad. Sci. 6: 49 Keen, A. Myra 1937. An abridged check list and bibliography of west North American marine Mollusca. Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, Calif.; pp. 1 - 88; 2 figs. (29 September 1937) 1958. Sea shells of tropical West America; marine mollusks from Lower California to Colombia. i-xi+624 pp.; 10 colored plts.; 1700 text figs. Stanford Univ. Press, Stan- ford. Calif: (5 December 1958) 1962. A new West Mexican subgenus and new species of Montacutidae (Mollusca, Pelecypoda) . Pacific Naturalist 3 (9): 321-328; 5 text figs. (16 October 1962) 1963. | Marine molluscan genera of western North America: an illustrated key. Stanford Univ. Press; 1 - 126; illust. MacponaLp, Keiru B. 1967. Quantitative studies of salt marsh mollusc faunas from the North American Pacific coast. Univ. Calif, San Diego. Ph. D. Thesis, 291 pp. MacGinitie, Georce Esser Proc. Cal. 1935. Ecological aspects of a California marine estuary. Amer. Midl. Natur., 16 (5): 629 - 765 Meyer, K. O. 1955. | Naturgeschichte der Strandschnecke Ovatella myosotis (DRAPARNAUD). Arch. Molluskenk. 84: 1 - 43 NEWELL, R. 1965, The role of detritus in the nutrition of two marine deposit feeders, the prosobranch Hydrobia ulvae and the bi- valve Macoma balthica. Proc. Zool. Soc. London 144: 25 - 45 PALMER, KATHERINE VAN WINKLE 1958. Type specimens of marine mollusca described by P P Carpenter from the West Coast (San Diego to British Colum- bia). Memoir 76, Geol. Soc. Amer. i- viii + 1-376; plts. 1 - 35. New York, N. Y. (8 December 1958) PauLson, Epwarp G. 1957. Taxonomy of salt marsh snail, Ovatella myosotis, in central California. Nautilus 71 (1): 4-7; 1 fig. Purpy, E, A. 1964. Sediments as substrates. pp. 238-271, In: J. Imsrie « N. D. Newett (ed.), Approaches to Paleoecology. Wiley, Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Page 405 New York SANDER, K. 1950. Beobachtungen zur Fortpflanzung von Assiminea gray- ana LEACH. Arch. Molluskenk. 79: 147 - 149 SELLMER, G. P. 1967. Functional morphology and ecological life history of the gem clam, Gemma gemma. Malacologia 5: 137 - 223 Tuorson, GUNNAR 1957. | Bottom communities. In Treatise on marine ecology and paleoecology. J. W. Hedgpeth (ed.) Geol. Soc. Amer. Mem. 67, 1: 461 - 534 Tryon, GeorcE WASHINGTON, Jr. 1865. Descriptions of new species of Amnicola, Pomatiopsis, Somatogyrus, Gabbia, Hydrobia and Rissoa. Amer. Journ. Conchology 1: 219 - 222 VALENTINE, JAMES W. . 1966. Numerical analysis of marine molluscan ranges on the extratropical northeastern Pacific shelf. Limnol. Oceanogr. 11: 198 - 212 YonceE, CHaRLES MAurRICE 1952. Studies on Pacific coast mollusks. ITV. Observation on Siliqua patula Drxon and on the evolution within the Solen- idae. Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool. 55: 421 - 438. Page 406 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 The Type of Tegula funebralis (A. ADAMS, 1855) BY RUDOLF STOHLER Department of Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720 (Plate 65) As WAS SHOWN EARLIER (STOHLER, 1964), Tegula funeb- ralis (A. ApAMs, 1855) is a relatively variable species, even though, at the same time, it appears to be one of the least variable species of gastropods on the western coast of North America. This variability seems to apply only to two or, perhaps, three characters of the shell. One of these variable characters is the configuration of the base of the shell with which the paper already cited dealt. Another variable character seems to be the general shape of the shell. However, while the configuration of the base shows essentially the same type and range of variability from population to population, it would seem that the variability of the shape is limited to certain localities. This fact was also briefly mentioned in 1964. In the latter part of August 1968 I had the opportunity to examine the type specimens of Chlorostoma funebrale A. Apams, 1855 in the collection of the British Museum (Natural History) (Figures 1 to 3, Plate 65). It will be noticed that one of the 3 specimens (Figure 3) is very similar to the specimen illustrated in figure 2 of the earlier report. Unfortunately no exact type locality was given by Apams (1855, p. 317), only the very general statement “Hab. California.” After my return to Berkeley I re-examined the 596 specimens from 55 localities in the collection of the De- partment of Zoology at the University of California, Berkeley, with a view to measuring them and ascertaining the height: width ratios of these shells. However, even a casual glance at the 7 specimens shown in Figures 4 to 10 on the accompanying plate reveals the utter futility of such an attempt. The extremely variable amount of damage done to the apex of the shells by the responsible fungus and other agents (see PEpparp, 1964) could not possibly allow statistically valid measurements, calcula- tions, and conclusions. When, in spite of these acknowledged difficulties, I measured the figured specimens, it was done only for the purpose of ascertaining general trends in shell shape. The Table includes also the measurements obtained from the syntypes of the species in the BM(NH). A careful examination of lots of specimens from a single locality shows that the shells of young animals havea lower H:W ratio, i. e., are relatively wider than older shells. There seems to be no correlation with geographical origin of the specimens. On the other hand, the specimens shown in Figures 3 and 8 are so similar in appearance and their respective H: W ratios that it becomes a great temp- tation to conclude that they come from the same locality. 1.e., Duxbury Reef, Marin County, California. Yet the specimens shown in Figures 1 and 2 would fit very well into the population represented by the specimens pictured in Figures 4 and 5. These were collected at La Jolla, San Diego County. It seems more probable that the specimens Explanation of Plate 65 Tegula funebralis (A. ADAMS, 1855) Figure 1: Lectotype, Chlorostoma funebrale A. ADAMS, 1855. Cuming Collection, British Museum (Natural History) no. 1968208a Figure 2: Paralectotype, BM(NH) no. 1968208b Figure 3: Paralectotype, BM(NH) no. 1968208c Figure 4: Tegula funebralis, collected at La Jolla, California, 25 March, 1957; 30°52’N; 117°15/19” W; R, Stohler, coll. Figure 5: Same data as for preceding figure Figure 6: San Simeon, California, 18 August 1947; 35°39’30" N; 121°14’ W; R. Stohler, coll. Figure 7: Same data as for preceding figure Figure 8: Duxbury Reef, California, 30 October 1947; 37°53 N; 122°42’ W; R. Stohler, coll. Figure 9: Drakes Estero, California, 18 July 1947; 38°02’N; 122°56’ W; R. Stohler, coll. Figure 10: Elk, California, 24 June 1947; 39°06’ N; 123°42’30” W; R. Stohler, coll. Tue VELIGER, Vol. 11, No. 4 [SToHLER] Plate 65 Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 { Figure 5 | ‘Figure Go Figure 7 Figure 9 Figure 10 photographs by R. STOHLER Vol. 11; No. 4 Table 1 Height and Width Measurements (in millimeters) and Height: Width Ratios of Some Specimens of Tegula funebralis Height Width H:W (mm) (mm) Figure 1 39.45 34.45 LS Figure 2 35,85 3272 eve Figure 3 41.15 29.9 1.38 Figure 4 28.3 2029) ail Figure 5 24.0 24.9 0.96 Figure 6 26.5 5) Hels Figure 7 3515) 29.1 12 18.25 18.3 0.99 18) 18.6 0.85 11.1 12.8 0.87 Figure 8 43.85 31.0 eal Figure 9 26.9 28.0 0.96 Figure 10 28.75 29M 0.97 14.4 19.4 0.74 14.0 17.8 0.79 GF2 10.8 0.85 (Note: the data for shells following those for Figures 7 and 10, respectively, were obtained from specimens from the same locality. ) in the Cuming collection were actually obtained at or near San Diego, rather than at the northern site. It has been emphasized earlier (STOHLER, 1964) that the tall and relatively slender specimens found in fairly large numbers at Duxbury Reef can always be picked out with ease in any general collection. A close comparison of Figures 3, 7 and 8 will, I believe, substantiate this claim, although possibly not as convincingly as the actual examination of specimens in large collections would. Despite the unusually large and relatively slender speci- men from near San Simeon in San Luis Obispo County, THE VELIGER Page 407 I still maintain that the shape observed at Duxbury Reef is characteristic for the Tegula funebralis population there. The specimen from San Simeon is but a single one in a lot of 6, where the remaining 5 conform more to the “normal” shape of the species, while the one from Dux- bury Reef is one of a lot of 6, all of which are extremely similar to this one. Since the type lot of Apams’ species included 3 speci- mens, one of which exhibited a shape relatively rarely encountered in the field among large populations of Tegula funebralis, I here select as the lectotype the shell illustrated in Figure 1 on Plate 65; the other 2 specimens are to be considered as paralectotypes. In my opinion the lectotype exemplifies the most commonly encountered representative of T: funebralis, while the paralectotypes may be considered as illustrating the range of normal variability of adult specimens. The lectotype has been given the number 1968208a, and the paralectotypes the numbers 1968208b « 1968208c, respectively, at the British Museum (Natural History). ACKNOWLEDGMENTS It is a pleasant duty to acknowledge the gracious cour- tesy with which the specimens and facilities at the British Museum (Natural History) were made available to me by Dr. Norman Tebble and Miss A. Fullick. LITERATURE CITED ApAMs, ARTHUR 1855. Descriptions of twenty-seven new species of shells from the collection of Hugh Cuming, Esq. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lon- don 22: 311 - 317 (8 May 1855) PrpparD, MarGARET CAROLINE 1964. Shell growth and repair in the gastropod Tegula funeb- ralis (Mollusca: Gastropoda) The Veliger 6, Supplement: 59 - 63; 3 text figs. (15 November 1964) STOHLER, RupDOLF 1964. Studies on mollusk populations VI. - Tegula funebralis (A. Apams, 1855) (Mollusca: Gastropoda) The Veliger 6, Supplement: 77 - 81; 5 text figs. (15 November 1964) Page 408 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 The Litiorina ziczac Species Complex BY THOMAS V. BORKOWSKI Department of Biological Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306"? AND MARILYNN R. BORKOWSKI Bureau of Commercial Fisheries, Tropical Atlantic Biological Laboratory, Virginia Key, Miami, Florida 33149 (Plate 66; 4 Text figures) INTRODUCTION Tue Littorina ziczac SPECIES COMPLEX has had a confused taxonomic history. The group has been described and fig- ured by several authors since GMeuin (1791) (D’Orsic- ny, 1840, 1841; Puiriprr, 1847, 1851; MoOrcu, 1876; Tryon, 1887; Bequaert, 1943; ABBoTtT, 1964) and each has changed the nomenclature. Tryon placed them all under the name Littorina ziczac but indicated three vari- eties. BEQUAERT concurred and attributed the differences in shape and sculpture to sexual dimorphism; however, RopricuEz (1959) stated that he could almost always separate the species into two forms showing different vertical distributions and FRAENKEL (1968) found two forms that differ in opercular structure. ABBotT (1964), examining live material, concluded that there are two species, Littorina ziczac (GMELIN) and L. lineolata p’Or- BIGNY, but from evidence given below, it will readily be seen that there are actually three species which are eco- logically and morphologically distinct. TAXONOMY The three species of the Littorina ziczac species complex are: Littorina ziczac (GMELIN, 1791), L. lineolata p’Or- « This study is based upon a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Masters of Sciences Degree at Florida State University by the senior author. 2 Present address: Institute of Marine Sciences, 1 Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami, Florida 33149 BIGNY, 1840, and L. lineata p’OrBicNy, 1841 (Plate 66). Partial synonymies are given for each species. Littorina ziczac (GMELIN, 1791) Trochus ziczak (pars) CHEMNITZ, 1781, Syst. Conchyl. Cab., 5, pit. 166, fig. 1599 [non-binomial] Trochus ziczac GMELIN, 1791, in Syst. Nat., 13 ed., 1, prt. 6, no. 3587 Littorina zigzag D’OrRBIGNY, 1842, In DE LA Sacra, Hist. Phys. Pol. Nat. Cuba, Moll., Atlas, plt. 15, figs. 5 - 8 Littorina debilis Puivipri1, 1846, Proc. Zool. Soc. London for 1845, p. 140 Littorina d’Orbignyana Puiiprt, 1847, Abb. Beschr. Conch., 2: 162; plt. 3, fig. 12 Cuemnitz in 1781 first figured Littorina ziczac, sensu stricto, and based his description on the descriptions of LisTER (1687) and FavANNE (1784). But the name as given and spelled by CuEmnitz must be considered in- correct because the International Commission of _Zoo- logical Nomenclature ruled that the first 11 volumes of CueEmnitz’ Conchylien Cabinet were nomenclatorially in- valid (SCHENK & McMasters, 1948). LisTER’s descrip- tion is pre-Linnean while FAVANNE uses non-binomial names. Therefore, GMELIN’s description and spelling of L. ziczac is the taxonomically valid citation for the species. D’Orpicny (1842) apparently used the names zigzag and ziczac interchangeably so that zigzag is to be considered only as an emendation of ziczac. Examination of Puiuippr’s (1851) and Tryon’s (1887) figures of Littorina debilis and Puiiprr’s (1847) figure of L. d’Orbignyana (which is L. zigzag p’OrBicny, 1842, Cuba p. 210, plt. 15, figs. 5-8) shows that these are synonyms of L. ziczac (GMELIN). Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Page 409 After some practice, this species can be easily distin- guished from the other two species by its lighter color, smooth shell surface, microscopic spiral striations, dark nuclear whorls, and by its generally larger size. As will be seen later, vertical position on the shore and the presence of 2 color bands in the aperture are also useful discrim- inators. frtor Littorina lineolata p’Orpicny, 1840 Trochus ziczak (pars) CHemnirz, 1781, Syst. Conchyl. Cab. 5: plt. 166, fig. 1600 [non binomial] Littorina lineolata p’Orsicny, 1840, Voy. Amér. Mérid., 5, prt. 3, Moll., p. 392 Littorina lineata (pars) p’OrpicnNy, 1841, in DE LA Sacra, Hist. Phys. Pol. Nat. Cuba, Moll., text p. 208; Atlas (1842), plt. 14, fig. 25 (not 24, 26-27) Littorina lineata Puiirri, 1847, Abb. Besch. Conch., 2: 162; pit. 3, fig. 18 minor Littorina jamaicensis C. B. ApaMs, 1850, Contr. Conch. 5: 71 Littorina floccosa Morcu, 1876, Malak. Blatter 23: 140 Littorina angustior var. fasciata Morcu, 1876, Malak. Blat- ter 23: 139 Cuemnitz described and figured a variety of Trochus ziczak which he did not name and GMELIN, 1791, copied this description, but p’OrBicny named it in 1840. Litto- ‘rina jamaicensis, as redescribed by MOrcu, is lineolata and L. floccosa Morcu, 1876, must be considered a syn- onym of L. lineolata since M6rcu considered Trochus ziczak, fig. 1600, and L. lineata v’Orsicny, fig. 25, as synonyms of L. floccosa. MOrcu lists L. lineata, fig. 25, as a synonym for L. angustior, var. fasciata. As Tryon indicates, this species is more ovate, with conspicuous striations. It is sometimes sharply keeled and has but one adapical color band in the aperture. The nuclear whorls are light colored and the columella tends to be a light brown or lavender, as opposed to dark brown in the other two. This species may also have a smooth grayish appearance due to erosion and the presence of boring fungi, but in this condition it cannot be mistaken for L. ziczac. Littorina lineata D’OrsIGNY, 1841 Littorina lineata p’Orsicny, 1841, in DE LA Sacra, Hist. Phys. Pol. Nat. Cuba, Moll., text p. 208; Atlas plt. 14, figs. 24, 26-27 (not fig. 25) Littorina carinata pD’OrBIGNY, 1842, in DE LA Sacra, Hist. Phys. Pol. Nat. Cuba, Moll. (not Turbo carinatus SowEr- By), Atlas, plt. 15, figs. 1-4; text p. 209 Littorina angustior Morcu, 1876, Malak. Blatter 23: 139 This species, although common and easy to find, has often been overlooked because of its smaller size and proximity to the other, more conspicuous species. D’OrR- BIGNY Split it into 2 groups, keeled and unkeeled, and named them carinata and lineata, respectively. This dis- tinction, however, cannot be consistently made, since the two extremes completely intergrade into one another. Either name, then, is applicable to the species. The name carinata, however, is a homonym to Turbo carinatus SoweErsy, 1819, which is also a littorinid, but not the same as Littorina carinata D’OrBIGNY (BEQUAERT, 1943). There- fore, the name lineata p’Orpicny, 1841 is the correct name, with the understanding that p’Orsicny’s figure 25 is lineolata. It is unfortunate that the two names lineata and lineolata are so similar but p’OrBIGNYy made it clear that he considered these different when he described line- olata in 1840 and considered lineata as a variety of lineo- lata. It is also unfortunate that Puiwiprr in 1847 rede- scribed lineata p’OrBicNy in such a manner that lineata Puiippi is clearly a synonym of lineolata. Assort (1964) included Littorina lineata p’OrBicNy within his concept of L. lineolata but has since agreed (personal communication) that this third species is valid and distinct. M6rcn’s and Tryon’s figures and descrip- tions show that L. angustior is a synonym of L. lineata. This species is exceedingly similar to Littorina lineolata, but several characters serve to separate them easily. Lit- torina lineata is generally smaller and darker than the other two, and has tendencies towards flattened whorls and straight rather than wavy or zigzag “flames.” Its nuclear whorls are light and there are two or more color bands in the aperture. A melanic form of the species is found on the east coast of Florida and the Florida Keys. DISTRIBUTION The Littorina ziczac species complex belongs to the West Indian fauna, but it is also found all around the Caribbe- an and most of the Gulf of Mexico (HEpcPETH, 1953; Bequaert, 1943). It is not found on the Florida west coast and is absent from the Gulf coast of the United States as far west as Galveston, Texas, where it again becomes abundant. The complex extends as far south as Uruguay and as far north as Bermuda. All three species seem to occur together nearly uniformly, but collectors have not been aware of the three species within the com- plex and records are not always reliable. On the Florida east coast, the three are distributed decidedly differently and show separate limits of northern and southern distributions (Text figure 1). The farthest north any of the three ranges is Cape Kennedy, where Littorina lineolata reaches its limit. Only occasional spe- cimens of L. lineata are found north of Sebastian Inlet and L. ziczac seldom occurs north of Jupiter Inlet. On Page 410 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 Cape Kennedy . Sebastian Inlet Ft. Pierce Inlet Hutchinson’s Island Jupiter Inlet North Palm Beach Inlet * Boca Raton eod Government Cut Cape Florida %: Key Largo Tavernier ~ Jon Islamorada OD & West Summerland Key we fon e Figure 1 Species Distribution between Cape Kennedy and West Summerland Key @ = Littorina lineolata; O = Littorina lineata; CD = Littorina ziczac the other hand, L. lineolata occurs only sporadically south of Cape Florida on Key Biscayne, Miami, Florida. These limits do not appear to be operable on the other side of the Florida straits. Littorina ziczac is abundant at Bermuda and L. lineolata is found throughout the Baha- mas and the West Indies, as far south as Barbados. The mechanisms determining the distribution patterns on the Florida east coast are not known. The vertical distributions of the three species are dif ferent, although all live supratidally in the splash zone. On the Florida coast, because of their latitudinal distri- bution, either Littorina ziczac or L. lineolata is often ab- sent or poorly represented. In those areas where all 3 are well represented, the total number of animals is small or the substrate is so irregular that adequate transects are difficult to obtain. Such results as have been obtained, however, indicate that the order of representation of the 3 species on the shore, from highest to lowest, is: Littorina lineata, L. lineolata, and L. ziczac. The distribution of each species overlaps those of the others somewhat and in areas where L. lineolata is absent, i. e., the Florida Keys, there is no gap in the distribution between L. lineata and L. ziczac. Similarly, where L. ziczac is absent, L. lineolata extends as far down the shore as the barnacle zone (Tetraclita spp.). Table 1 Vertical distribution of Littorina lineata and Littorina lineolata on beachrock at Boca Raton, Florida, 14 August 1966 Distance Littorina (meters) lineata lineolata ziczac 4.5 2 0 0 4.2 1 0 0 3.9 4 0 0 3.6 9 0 0 3.3 15 (0) 0 3.0 18 0 0 2.7 34 0 0 2.4 27 2 0 2.1 21 1 0 1.8 0 5 0 1.5 1 16 0 1.2 0 10 1 0.9 0 21 0 0.6 0 18 1 0.3 0 15 1 MHW 0 0 0 Table 1 indicates the distinctness of the vertical sepa- ration of Littorina lineata and L. lineolata at Boca Raton, Florida. The supratidal zone at Boca Raton is consider- ably widened by wave action against a sandstone outcrop- ping, which extends about 2 m above mid-tide level and the range of distribution extends considerably onto the top of the outcrop because of splash. In more sheltered areas, since the tidal range is less than a meter along most of the Florida coast, the vertical distributions are con- siderably compressed. The observed pattern is the same regardless of exposure or type of substrate (i.e., sand- stone, coral limestone, broken concrete granite, cement bags, etc., incorporated into jetties, sea walls, or com- posing natural formations) (Borkowski, 1967). The pattern is not changed when L. ziczac replaces L. lineolata. SHELL MORPHOLOGY The three species are statistically distinct in shell character measurements. Less than one misidentification in 1000 is likely if shell measurements alone are used. Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Page 411 The procedures of Kim, Brown & Cook (1964, 1966) were used to select key characters for the 3 species, those characters with low intercharacter correlation and proba- bility of misclassification. Shell characters for analysis were chosen on the basis of their importance in describing shell shape as discussed by FRETTER & GRAHAM (1962). These were: height; height/width ratio; aperture diame- ter; ratio of suture-to-suture whorl widths; spire angle; angle of the parietal wall from the axis; and angle at the keel (Text figure 2). The characters, lines/millimeter and ——— Figure 2 Measurements for Statistical Comparisons A - height; B- width; C - aperture diameter; D - whorl width; E - lines per millimeter number of zigzags per whorl, were added as possible specific discriminators. Distances were measured by sliding scale Vernier calipers, accurate to 0.1 mm, supplemented by a pair of small cartographer’s dividers on smaller dis- tances, and angles were measured by a protractor accurate to one degree. Accuracy of measurement was checked by measuring 10 specimens 5 times for each character, each measure- ment of a character separated by a sufficient time lapse to minimize repetitive measurement bias. Specimens of Littorina lineata and L. lineolata were collected from Boca Raton beachrock, just north of the Boca Raton Inlet, on 29 April 1966. Several small, indis- criminately chosen areas were denuded of all animals until approximately 1000 animals had been collected, about 500 of each species. Littorina ziczac, s.5., was scarce at this collecting site, so that a somewhat smaller number had to be used, collected at various dates from the vicinity. Table 2 Intercharacter correlation coefficients for Littorina lineata, Littorina lineolata and Littorina ziczac Littorina Variables lineata lineolata —ziczac Whorl ratio: spire angle . 0.9 0.8 - 7 height 0.8 -0.1 -0.3 height-width -0.7 —_ — aperture diameter -0.7 0.0 0.4 lines/mm -0.7 0.03 -0.7 flames -0.8 -0.2 -0.8 angle parietal wall 1.0 0.1 0.3 angle at keel 0.0 -0.5 -0.7 Spire angle: height -0.9 -0.9 -0.9 height-width 0.8 -0.2 -0.8 aperture diameter 0.7 -0.9 —0.7 lines/mm -0.3 0.4 -0.9 flames 0.8 0.2 -0.1 angle parietal wall 0.0 -0.9 -0.3 angle at keel 0.9 -0.98 -0.8 Height: height-width 0.7 0.6 0.9 aperture diameter 0.98 1.0 0.99 lines/mm -0.9 -0.7 0.6 flames 0.97 0.97 0.8 angle parietal wall 0.9 0.3 0.5 angle at keel 0.9 0.9 0.97 Height-width: aperture diameter 0.9 -0.1 1.0 lines/mm —0.7 -0.3 -0.2 flames 0.95 -0.4 -0.4 angle parietal wall — 0.0 0.8 angle at keel 0.6 0.8 0.8 Aperture diameter: lines/mm -0.9 -0.7 0.6 flames 0.99 -0.8 -0.1 angle parietal wall 0.7 0.6 0.0 angle at keel 0.8 0.9 0.7 Flames: lines/mm 0.7 -0.6 -0.1 angle parietal wall 0.7 0.6 0.3 angle at keel 0.4 0.2 0.3 Angle parietal wall: lines /mm -0.6 0.0 0.2 angle at keel 0.8 0.95 0.4 Angle at keel: lines/mm -0.7 —0.6 0.9 Table 2 shows intercharacter correlations for the three species; several characters appear promising as discrim- inators. The character pairs that may separate Littorina ziczac from the other two are: whorl ratio-spire angle, Page 412 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 height-lines/mm, aperture diameter-lines/mm, and angle at the keel-lines/mm. For L. lineata, whorl ratio-height, whorl ratio-aperture diameter, whorl ratio-angle at the parietal wall, spire angle-aperture diameter, spire angle- flames, spire angle-angle at the keel, height-width ratio- flames, and angle of the parietal wall-lines/mm, and per- haps whorl ratio-angle at the keel, appear promising. But for L. lineolata, whorl ratio-lines/mm and height- width ratio-aperture diameter are the only promising character pairs. Spire angle-height-width ratio, spire angle -lines/mm, aperture diameter-flames, flames-lines/mm, and flames-angle of the parietal wall, may discriminate among all three. Further examination, however, indicates that height, height-width ratio, aperture diameter, angle at the keel, spire angle, and flames form a well-correlated unit. The 2 characters correlated to this unit and separating Littorina ziczac from the other two are lines/mm and whorl ratio. These are quite well correlated to one another so that one or the other may be useful as a key character when compared to the others on a common size scale such as height. None of the above characters seems useful for separating L. lineata from L. lineolata, but the lines in the aperture, not included in the correlations because of stable consistent differences, are very important in this respect. Littorina lineolata has only one color line in the aper- ture. The other two species have 2 color lines in the aper- ture. Littorina lineata and L. ziczac may have 3 color lines depending on the darkness of the aperture pigment and its ability to make the zone below the keel opaque. Littorina lineolata seldom, if ever, shows more, or less, than one line in the aperture. A triangular graph (Text figure 3), using percentages 58560500 L. carinata L. lineolata ——-— LL. ziczac Aperture Diameter Figure 3 Multicharacter Comparison of the Three Species of a combined total of 3 character values, shows the good discrimination among the 3 species when compared against a size parameter, in this case, aperture diameter. This result is based on data from specimens from several collecting stations and from different times of the year, as well as the original data, so that the result may be con- sidered as indicative of actual species differences and not just 3 variants of one population. The values used for aperture diameter were restricted to the height range 6 - 12 mm to make the data comparable for the 3 species, but the normal size range of all 3 species does not differ considerably from this. The apparent overlap between Littorina ziczac and L. lineata on the triangular graph is not important if the size parameter is noted because the values for L. ziczac are overlapping those of much smaller L. lineata. EGG CAPSULE DIFFERENCES Another good species discriminator is the shape and size of the egg capsule. All 3 species release free-floating egg capsules of a uniform size and characteristic shape for each species (Text figure 4). Egg capsules were collected on several occasions by putting freshly collected animals in a jar containing sea water overnight. The water was then examined for cap- sules which were measured, and drawn by aid of a camera lucida. The capsules of Littorina lineolata are considerably different from those of the other 2 species. They are large and bell-shaped while the other 2 types are small and beehive-shaped. The absence of rings on the sides of the L. ziczac capsule is the most reliable characteristic in distinguishing the L. lineata and L. ziczac capsules. The ridges on the L. lineata capsule may occasionally be less distinct so that it closely resembles the L, ziczac capsule in general appearance. The capsules of Nodilittorina tuberculata MENKE are very similar to the Littorina lineata capsules, although less so than the figures of AsBotT (1954) would tend to indicate. In the Nodilittorina capsules, as seen from the side, the number of rings is 9 or 10. The L. lineata cap- sules have only 6 or 7, and the rings are farther apart. All 3 capsules, Littorina ziczac, L. lineata, and Nodi- littorina, may appear concentric or spiral from the top depending on the individual capsule and method of lighting the capsules when observing. The 3 Littorina capsules have been figured in the liter- ature under the name L. ziczac. LrBour (1945) figured the capsule of L. ziczac s.s., and Lewis (1960) figured the capsules of L. lineolata and L. lineata, calling them Vol. 11; No. 4 (@) OR 1G) & Figure 4 Egg Capsules of the Three Species A = Littorina lineolata; B = Littorina lineata; C = Littorina ziczac The line in each case represents one millimeter large and small type L. ziczac capsules, respectively. Aspotr (1954) and Marcus & Marcus (1963) fig- ured the capsule of L. ziczac. ABpotr in 1964 used these authors’ figures as partial evidence that 2 species exist, but failed to distinguish between the Lewis L. lineata capsule and the Lesour L. ziczac capsule. CONCLUSIONS Vertical and latitudinal distributions of the 3 species strongly indicate that each is a distinct ecological entity. Littorina lineolata has a more northern distribution in THE VELIGER Page 413 Florida, while L. ziczac is found farther south, and L. lineata has a higher position on the shore than either. Three distinct egg capsule types furnish further proof of this distinctness. Statistical testing for diagnostic characters has shown that the characters, lines in the aperture and spiral striae per millimeter, can distinguish among the 3 species with an error of less than one in a thousand. Certain differences in the operculum and the reproduc- tive structures have also been noted. These are currently being investigated and will be discussed in a later paper on the comparative anatomy of the tropical western Atlantic littorinids. On this basis, it is evident that three species are present within the Littorina ziczac species complex bearing the names: Littorina lineata D’OrpicNy, 1841; L. lineolata p Orsicny, 1840; and L. ziczac (GMELIN, 1791). ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank Dr. H. W. Wells and Dr. Wm. H. Heard for facilities and guidance during preparation of the Master’s Thesis. We also thank Dr. R. T: Abbott and Dr. J. Rose- water for encouragement and taxonomic informaton, and Dr. H.B. Moore, Dr. D. Moore and Dr. EM. Bayer for critically reading this manuscript. LITERATURE CITED Assott, Ropert TUCKER 1954. Review of the Atlantic periwinkles, Nodilittorina, Echi- ninus, and Tectarwus. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 103 (3228) : 449 - 464; figs. 55 - 57 1964. Littorina ziczac (GMELIN) and L. lineolata OrpBIcNy. Nautilus 78 (2): 65 - 66 BEQUAERT, JOSEPH CHARLES 1943. The genus Littorina in the western Atlantic. sonia 1 (7): 1-27; 7 plts. Borkowski, THomas V. 1967. An analysis of the systematics of the Littorina ziczac species complex, intertidal gastropods of the West Indian fauna. Masters Thesis, Florida State University. Burma, B. H. 1948. Studies in quantitative paleontology. I. Some aspects of the theory and practice of quantitative invertebrate paleon- tology. Journ, Paleontol. 22: 725 - 761 FRETTER, VERA, & ALASTAIR GRAHAM 1962. British prosobranch molluscs, their functional anatomy and ecology. London, Ray Soc. xvi + 755 pp.; 316 figs. GMELIN, JOHANN FREDERICH 1791. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae 3021 - 3910. John- Editio decima tertia, aucta, reformata 1 (6): Lipsia Page 414 HEpcPETH, JoEL W. 1953. An introduction to the zoogeography of the north- western Gulf of Mexico with reference to the invertebrate fauna. Inst. Mar. Sci. 3: 110 - 224 Kim, K. C., B. W. Brown «& E. FE Coox 1964. A quantitative taxonomic study of the Enderleinellus suturalis complex (Anoplura: Hoplopleuridae). Syst. Zool. 12:134 - 148 1966. A quantitative taxonomic study of the Hoplopleura hes- peromydia complex (Anoplura: Hoplopleuridae), with notes @ posteriori taxonomic characters. Syst. Zool, 15: 24-45 Lesour, Marie V. 1945. The eggs and larvae of some prosobranchs from Ber- muda. _ Proc. Zool. Soc. London 114: 462 - 489. Lister, M. 1687. Historia conchyliorum. Edit. 3, 2. Marcus, EvELYN & Ernst Marcus 1963. | Mesogastropoden von der Kiiste von Sao Paulo. Abhandl. Math.-Naturwissensch. Klasse Akad. Wiss. & Lit. 1: 105 pp. MOoNTCERVELLE, FAVANNE DE 1784. Catal. Cabinet M. de Montcervelle (Le Comte de la Tour d’Auvergne). Morcu, Otro ANpREas Lowson 1876. Synopsis molluscorum marinorum Indiarum occidenta- lium. Malakozool. Blatter 26: 87 - 142 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 Orsicny, ALcipe DESSALINES D’ (1841) -1853. Mollusques, in Ramon de la Sagra, Histoire phy- sique, politique et naturelle de l’tle de Cuba. Paris (Arthus Bertrand): 2 vols., atlas of 28 plts. 1840. Voyage dans l’Amérique méridionale 5 (3): Puiuipr1, RUDOLF AMANDUS 1845-1851. Abbildungen und Beschreibungen neuer oder wenig gekannter Conchylien. vols. 1 - 3 RopricuEz, G. . . . Mollusques. 1959. The marine communities of Margarita Island, Vene- zuela. Bul. Mar. Sci. Gulf and Carib. 9: 237-280; 26 figs. Scuenk, E. T. « J. H. McMasrTers 1948. Procedure in taxonomy. Rev. ed. Stanford Univ. Press 93 pp. Stanford, California STEPHENSON, T. A. « ANNE STEPHENSON 1952. Life between the tidemarks in North America. II. North- ern Florida and the Carolinas. Journ. Ecol. 40: 1 - 49 Tryon, GEorcE WASHINGTON, Jr. 1887. | Manual of conchology, structural and systematic. IX. Solariidae, Ianthinidae, Trichotropidae, Scalariidae, Cerithiidae, Rissoidae, Littorinidae. 9: 1-488; 71 plts. Philadelphia. Explanation of Plate 66 The Littorina ziczac species complex Figures 1 & 2: Littorina lineata p’OrBIGNY, 1841 Figures 3 & 4: Littorina lineolata p’OrBIGNY, 1840 Figures 5 & 6: Littorina ziczac (GMELIN, 1791) The lines on the figures equal one millimeter Tue VELIcER, Vol. 11, No. 4 [Borkowsk1 & BorKxowskI] Plate 66 Figure 2 Figure 4 ” P : y Figure 5 he _.. : Figure 6 Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Page 415 Spawning and Development in the Trochid Gastropod Euchelus gemmatus (Goutp, 1841) in the Hawaiian Islands THOMAS M. DUCH Science Department, Bennett College, Millbrook, New York 12545 (2 Text figures) THE PURPOSE OF THIS PAPER is to describe the breeding habits and development of the trochacean gastropod Eu- chelus gemmatus (Goup, 1841) in the Hawaiian Islands. There are no previous reports of spawning periodicity or laboratory observations on the spawning behavior of a tropical trochid. Euchelus gemmatus is a small (2 to 4mm in height) trochid which is common in shallow water along the shore- lines of the Hawaiian Islands. Large populations of this ‘animal occur on the lower surfaces of dark, mottled rocks ~ in tidepools and in shallow offshore waters where there is moderate turbulence. The snails are usually found con- gregated in crevices and beneath algae, but they are also able to cling to exposed rock surfaces. METHODS Forty animals averaging 2 to 4mm in height were collec- ted in October, 1965, and maintained in 2 one-gallon con- tainers, 20 in a non-aerated jug and 20 in a container in which the turbulence of the natural habitat was simu- lated by means of an air stone. The animals were main- tained in both situations for a period of 2 years and spawning and development occurred equally well among snails in both containers. Egg masses which were deposited on the glass walls of the containers were removed by means of dissecting needles and placed on microscope slides which were set on a stand in a finger bowl. The egg masses were then easily removed for microscopic examination and could be replaced without injury. Daily changes of sea water and a soft jet of air bubbles directed onto the egg masses increased the survival rate of the developing em- bryos by reducing the numbers of ciliates which often congregate about the egg masses. SPAWNING HABITS Spawning in Euchelus gemmatus occurs from late De- cember through April. The beginning of the spawning period is marked by the secretion of a gelatinous coat over the surface of the female shells; the covering remains on the shells throughout the spawning period. Subsequent to the appearance of the coat, pair formation occurs, a smaller male becoming attached to the left apertural sur- vitelline membrane spherical enclosure ess oval capsule — 120p egg mass _————— 10 mm Figure 1 Euchelus gemmatus (Gou.p, 1841) Egg capsule and egg mass Page 416 face of the female shell. Because trochids presumably do not copulate, it is suggested that the male’s position near the aperture of the female shell permits gametes to pass into the mantle cavity of the female. During the period of observation 13 egg masses were deposited on flat surfaces from 1 to 5cm above the sur- face of the water; the egg masses were deposited at twilight and at the time of high tide, with 9 of the egg masses deposited in March at the time of “extreme” high tide. After the initial spawning of one or two pairs of trochids, the remaining pairs spawned with increasing frequency. Although it was difficult to observe egg deposition be- cause of the initial transparency of the egg mass, it was possible to see the general pattern. Each female moves over a path about 15 mm in length in a counter-clockwise direction, depositing the egg mass (Figure 1). The egg masses are 3 to 14mm in length, 2 to 3mm wide, and about 1 mm thick, and they are deposited in the form of 3 to 5 loops. Females with smaller shells produce masses with fewer loops. The egg masses are flexible, jelly-like structures, enveloped by a thin, transparent integument which becomes translucent within an hour after depo- sition. The wall of the mass is tubulate and several layers of egg capsules are contained within the translucent ma- trix except at the tapered tips of the loop. The eggs are brown and spherical, about 50 in dia- meter. Each egg is surrounded by a relatively homogenous sphere of albumen-like material, that nearest the egg semi-fluid and clear, the remainder more viscous. The egg and semi-fluid material are in turn surrounded by the vitteline membrane which is contained within a spherical elastic enclosure suspended in an outer oval capsule (Fig- ure 1). The elastic enclosure stretches slowly as the em- bryo develops, exhibiting a fibrillar appearance. Prior to hatching, when the envelope is ripped by the embryo, the elastic enclosure almost fills the outer capsule. The cap- sules, which are closely packed within the matrix of the egg mass, are irregularly shaped because of crowding. DEVELOPMENT Early cleavage is initiated immediately after the egg mass is deposited. The first 2 cleavages are equal and occur within a few hours at a water temperature of 23°C. Subsequent cleavages result in the formation of large macromeres and small micromeres which envelop the macromeres, giving rise to the blastula within 2 days. A ciliated gastrula, which is flattened at the poles, de- velops during the next 2 or 3 days. The eggs at the surface of the egg mass are generally more advanced than are those near the center of the matrix, THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 The trochophore is recognizable 2 to 4 days after the egg mass is deposited and persists within the egg capsule for 3 to 5 days. The velar lobes are lightly pigmented and, although ciliated, the only noticeable motion is a slight vertical vibration. In the dorsal region a thickened clump of cells, the shell gland, becomes visible, and by the end of the third or fourth day this area of the embryo is covered by a thin sheet of shell matrix. The shell expands, occupying about # of the dorsal surface, in a trochophore ready to metamorphose. Anterior and vent- ral to the visceral mass are 2 large, rounded protuber- ances which fuse, forming the foot of the veliger. As the foot develops, statocysts form as 2 elongated depressions behind the region of the mouth. There are 7 to 12 vibrating, calcareous grains in each statocyst, which grad- ually “sink” into the foot and are covered by pedal tissue. Rudiments of eyes, as 2 dark pigmented areas, are also visible at this period. —epipodial tentacle shell shell — SSS 250p Figure 2 Euchelus gemmatus (Goutp, 1841) Dorsal view of the late veliger stage The veliger becomes recognizable 3 to 9 days after spawning, with a cap-like shell and anteriorly projecting foot (Figure 2). There is now a series of 5 protuber- ances: 3 small protuberances from which develop the epipodial tentacles and 2 larger protuberances which develop into the large anterior tentacles. Each protuber- Vol. 11; No. 4 ance has a concentration of cilia about it, moving more or less in a counter-clockwise direction. The visceral hump with its cap-like shell slowly shifts posteriorly, and torsion occurs within the next 24 hours. The shell seems to be deposited by the mantle as a thin translucent covering. Shortly after the translucent cover- ing has been deposited, a shingle-like layer is deposited and continues to develop, soon occupying the entire dorsal surface behind the prototroch. On the posterior side of the foot a thin functional operculum develops, which in a short time is large enough to close the aperture of the shell. The operculum is first laid down as a series of “cellular” blocks which fuse and ultimately form the “true operculum.” At the same time, the shell, which was very thin, becomes thicker and calcareous, with a furrowed surface. As early as the second week of development, the veliger is seen actively moving about in the fluid of the egg capsule. The movement is generally limited to extending THE VELIGER Page 417 and quickly retracting the foot into the shell. The re- tractive response seems to be associated with changes in light intensity and slight external vibrations. Shortly after, when the albumen-like material is gone, the veliger becomes very active and rips the egg capsule with its radula, leaving as a semi-crawling larva. Though the lar- vae are capable of darting movement, they remain rela- tively inactive, their movement localized to midway on the sides of the container. The larvae grow to 2mm in height and, as the next breeding season approaches, the snails pair up and begin moving up and down the sides of the container with the times of the tides, laying egg masses in the same fashion as their parents. ACKNOWLEDGMENT I greatly appreciate the advice and comments of Dr. E. Alison Kay, University of Hawaii. Page 418 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 New Records of Nudibranchs from New Jersey BY ROBERT E. LOVELAND, GORDON HENDLER AND GARY NEWKIRK ! Rutgers, the State University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903 IN A RECENT PAPER by FRANZ (1968), it was suggested that the paucity of records for species of nudibranchs occurring in New Jersey can be attributed to the absence of systematic and diligent collecting along the coastline. Although the general substrate of muddy-sand in New Jersey might restrict the number of species of nudibranchs, there are suitable outcroppings of man-made jetties and floating wharves where nudibranchs may occur. It is probable that new state records will occur for various kinds of invertebrates as collecting intensity increases. This was shown to be true for benthic, macroscopic algae by Taytor et al. (1968). The following list represents new information concerning the occurrence and distribu- tion of nudibranchs along the Atlantic coast of North America. NUDIBRANCHIA DENDRONOTACEA 1. Dendronotus frondosus (Ascantus, 1774), as Dendro- notus arborescens in MINER (1950). Occurrence: Shark River, April-May, 1968. Previous distribution, from Bay of Fundy to Long Island Sound (Moore, 1964). Many hundreds of this species were found in associa- tion with Tubularia on a floating wharf. Color ranged from nearly pure white to dark brown. ODHNER (1939) asserts that the white form of Dendronotus is predominant in deep water. 2. Doto coronata (GmeEuN, 1791), as Idulia coronata in Moore (1964). Occurrence: Shark River, May, 1968. Previous distribution, from Bay of Fundy to Long Island Sound (Moore, 1964). Originally described from Great ' We are indebted to Dr. David R. Franz, Biological Sciences, University of Connecticut, for criticizing this manuscript and for confirming our identifications. This work was supported, in part, by a grant from the Joint Investigatory Committee for Environmental Effects on Thermal Addition in Barnegat Bay. Egg Harbor, New Jersey, by VerRILL & SmirH (1873), but rediscovered only recently. DORIDACEA 3. Acanthodoris pilosa (O. EF Mier, 1776), as Doris pilosa in ALDER & Hancock (1845 - 1855) and as Doris bifida in VERRILL & SmirH (1873). Occurrence: Delaware Bay, May, 1968. Previous distribution, throughout New England (Moore, 1964). Reported, however, from Mary- land by Marcus (1961). A single specimen of this dorid was collected from among unidentified encrusting ectoprocts on the back of a large Limulus. EOLIDACEA 4. Trinchesia aurantia (ALDER & Hancock, 1842), as Eolis aurantia in ALDER & Hancock (1845 - 1855), as Montagua gouldu in VERRILL & SmitH (1873), as Catri- ona aurantia in AppotT (1954), and as Cratena aurantia in Moore (1964). Occurrence: Shark River, April-May, 1968. Previous distribution, from New Hampshire to Woods Hole (Moore, 1964). j This species occurs commonly on the Connecticut shore on Tubularia (Franz, personal communication) ; how- ever, this is the first instance of Cratena aurantia in New Jersey. Specimens were found in association with Dendro- notus frondosus among thick growths of Tubularia on floating wharves, although its food source could not be ascertained. 5. Eubranchus pallidus (ALDER & Hancock, 1842), as Folis picta in ALDER & Hancock (1845 - 1855) and as Aeolis picta in Goutp & Binney (1870). Occurrence: Shark River, February, 1967. Previous distribution, from Bay of Fundy to Rhode Island (Moore, 1964). This single specimen was found very low on the inter- tidal zone of an exposed jetty, among unidentified hyd- roids. It is interesting to note that Lomentaria orcadensis, a rare species of boreo-arctic algae for New Jersey, was Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Page 419 also found from this same collection. Franz (personal communication) reports Eubranchus pallidus as being commonly found on Obelia along the Connecticut shore. 6. Tergipes tergipes (ForskaL), as Eolis despecta in Auper & Hancock (1845 - 1855), as Aeolis despecta in GouLp & Binney (1870), as Tergipes despectus in Moore (1964) and in Franz (1968). Occurrence: Shark River, May, 1968; previously a single animal collected at Shark River by Franz (1968) in November, 1961. Previous distribution, from Bay of Fundy to Rhode Island (Moore, 1964). A second specimen of Tergipes despectus reported for New Jersey in 7 years qualifies this species as rare. 7. Aeolidia papillosa (Linnaeus, 1761), as Eolis papil- losa in AtpER & Hancock (1845-1855) and as Aeolis papillosa in Goutp & Binney (1870) and. in MINER (1950). Occurrence: Shark River, May, 1965 - 1968; Manasquan River, May, 1967 - 1968; also reported by Franz (1968) for August, 1964. Previous distribution, from Bay of Fundy to Woods Hole (Moore, 1964) ; from Greenland to Rhode Island (Miner, 1950). Franz (personal communication) reports this species as being common in Connecticut. When first collected by Franz, this species was con- sidered quite rare for New Jersey. It has been our expe- rience that Aeolidia is rapidly becoming established in the estuaries of New Jersey as evidenced by its rather common occurrence in both Shark River and Manasquan Inlet during the spring of 1968 (Alan Schwartz, Rutgers Uni- versity, personal communication). Specimens of 3 - 4 cm have been taken from both localities. Both of these inlets are characterized by water of high salinity and rock jetties. Although our records for this nudibranch are from the rocks, Schwartz reports these animals from within the estuary. DISCUSSION It is becoming more evident that the marine fauna of New Jersey, especially the nudibranch mollusks, repre- sents a southern extension of the New England fauna, as was originally suggested by Franz (1968). It is not known, however, whether the species reported in this paper have recently invaded New Jersey or have been here unnoticed all along. Invasion by northern species of algae is apparently occurring, as in the case of Codium fragile (see Taytor, 1967). It is, therefore, possible that the eggs of nudibranchs, or the animals themselves, are being transported southward along the Atlantic coast by the same mechanism that is moving the algae. Once in New Jersey, they might then establish themselves in the man-made, compatible habitats that are being rapidly established in this densely populated coastal state. The white form of Dendronotus is reported generally from deep water (OpHNER, 1939). However, of the specimens collected in Shark River, at least 3 out of approximately 20 were of the white variety. All of these specimens were on floating wharves and, therefore, never deeper than several feet below the surface of the water. One white specimen has been sent to Dr. D. R. Franz of the University of Connecticut for further study. We have included a listing of the nudibranchs reported to date from New Jersey in Table 1. LITERATURE CITED ApsoTtt, RoBERT TUCKER 1954. American seashells. Princeton, New Jersey, D. van Nostrand Co., Inc.; xiv+541 pp.; 100 text figs.; 40 plts. ALDER, JosHUA, & ALBANY Hancock 1845 - 1855. A monograph of the British nudibranchiate mollusca Ray Soc. London, 438 pp. BLEAKNEY, J.S. « KantAuLono H. BaiLey 1967. Rediscovery of the salt-marsh sacoglossan Aldcria mo- desta LovEN in Eastern Canada. Proc. Malacol. Soc. London 37: 347 - 349 Cuameers, L. A. 1934. Studies on the organs of reproduction in the nudi- branchiate mollusks. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. 66: 599 - 641 Franz, Davip R. 1967. On the taxonomy and biology of the dorid nudibranch Doridella obscura. The Nautilus 80: 73 - 79 1968. Occurrence and distribution of New Jersey Opistho- branchia. The Nautilus 82 (1): 7-12 (July 1968) Gou.Lp, Aucustus AppISON & WILLIAM G. BINNEY 1870. | Report on the Invertebrata of Massachusetts. 24 ed. vit524 pp. Boston LowpbeEn, R. 1966. |New Jersey Mollusca checklist -— marine. The Jersey Sheller 1: 56 - 64 Marcus, Ernst 1961. Opisthobranchia from North Carolina. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc. 77 (2): 141-151 Miner, Roy WALDO 1950. ‘Field book of seashore life. to 251; G. PR Putnam’s Sons, New York Moore, GeorcEe M. 1964. Shell-less Opisthobranchia, pp. 153 - 164; 27 figs. In: R.1I.Smrru (ed.) Keys to marine invertebrates of the Woods Hole Region. Contr. 11, System.-Ecol. Program, Marine Biol. Labor., Woods Hole, Mass. Opune_r, Nits Hyatmar 1939. | Opisthobranchiate mollusca from the western and north- em coasts of Norway. Kgl. Norska Vidensk. Selsk. Skr. 1: 1-93; 59 text figs. Taytor, J. E. 1967. Codium reported from a New Jersey estuary. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 94: 57 - 59 Journ. xv +888 pp.; plts. 1 Page 420 THE VELIGER Table 1 Checklist of Nudibranchs Reported for New Jersey Species SACOGLOSSA Elysia catula (Goutp, 1870) Elysia chlorotica (Goutp, 1870) Alderia modesta (LovEN) NUDIBRANCHIA Doridacea Acanthodoris pilosa (Mier, 1776) Doridella obscura VERRILL Polycerella emertont VERRILL Polycerella conyma Marcus Tenellia fuscata (Goutp, 1870) Dendronotacea Doto coronata (GmEutN, 1791) Dendronotus frondosus (ASCANIUS, 1774) Eolidacea Aeolidia papillosa (Linnagus, 1761) Cratena pilata (Goutp, 1870) Trinchesia aurantia (ALDER & Han- cock, 1842) Eubranchus pallidus (ALDER & Han- cock, 1842) Tergipes tergipes FORSKAL Collected by VERRILL & SMITH (1873) F Phillips (Franz, 1968) VERRILL & SMITH (1873) K. Clark (Franz, 1968) Franz (1968) K. Clark (Franz, pers. comm., 1968) Loveland ¢ al., 1968 VERRILL & SMITH (1873) Franz (1967) LowpeEN (1966) as Corambella bara- tariae Harry D. Dean (FRANz, 1968) CuHamsers (1934) Franz (1968) CHampers (1934) Franz (1968) Hendler (personal communication) VERRILL & SMITH (1873) Loveland et al., 1968 Loveland e¢ al., 1968 Franz (1968) Schwartz (Loveland e¢ al., 1968) Lowpen (1966) Franz (1968) FE Phillips (Franz, 1968) Loveland et al., 1968 Loveland et al., 1968 Franz (1968) Taytor, J. E., E.T. Mout « R. E. Loveranp 1968. New and rare records of benthic marine algae from New Jersey (in prep.) VERRILL, Appison E. « S. I. Smiru 1873. Report upon the invertebrate animals of Vineyard Sound with an account of the physical characters of the region. Rep. U.S.Comm. Fish. for 1871-1872; prt. I: 295 - 778, Washington. Vol. 11; No. 4 Location Great Egg Harbor Barnegat Bay Great Egg Harbor Cheesequake Park Shark River Cheesequake Park Delaware Bay Great Egg Harbor Delaware Bay Not given Raritan Bay Barnegat Bay Jarvis Sound Barnegat Bay Shark River Delaware Bay Great Egg Harbor Shark River Shark River Shark River Manasquan Inlet Not given Delaware Bay Barnegat Bay Shark River Shark River Shark River Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Page 421 Nomenclatural Changes for the New Species Assigned to Cratena by MACFARLAND, 1966 RICHARD A. ROLLER 1127 Seaward Street, San Luis Obispo, California 93401 (2 Text figures) Frank Mace MacFarLANnpb’s POSTHUMOUSLY published volume on the opisthobranchiate mollusks of the Pacific coast of North America (1966) has been used by many research workers who felt the need for a comprehensive reference work on this group. The difficult task faced by the late Olive H. MacFarland in collating her late hus- band’s notes and drawings was mentioned by G Dallas Hanna in his preface to the monograph, and he antici- pated that corrections and additions might be required . at a later date. Burn (1968) commented on the need for Pacific coast workers to synonymize and validate the species described by MacFarland as new. The present contribution demon- strates the need for the generic transfer of 7 of these new species. MacFar.tanp (1966) introduced 7 new aeolid species (abronia, albocrusta, flavovulta, fulgens, rutila, spadix, and virens) and assigned them to the genus Cratena BEeRcH, 1864. Mrs. MacFarland added a note (op. cit., p. 332) that stated, “There is evidence among his notes and a letter from Nils Odhner that the author was carefully evaluating the status of the proper genus name for this group of aeolids prior to his death in 1951. However, the manuscript is published as left by him because he had not seen the later publications. The paper by WinckworTH (1941, pp. 146-149) in which Catriona is substituted for Cratena is especially significant.” Species of the genus C’ratena have the cleioproctic anal position; however, all 7 of the new species of aeolids described by MacFarland have the acleioproctic anal po- sition. Therefore the 7 species cannot be retained in Cratena. Opinion no. 777 of the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (1966) added Trinchesia InE- RING, 1879 to the Official List of Generic Names. In his proposal for stabilization of Trinchesia, LEmcueE (1964) stated that “there is still the possibility that Catriona could be used for a genus independently of Trinchesia.” BurN (1964) and EpmMunps (1968) main- tained Catriona as a valid genus separate from Trinchesia, and several other specialists (personal communications) have concurred with this separation. The two genera may be characterized as follows: Catriona Trinchesia Acleioproct Eolidacea Acleioproct Eolidacea Radula uniseriate with cusp Radula uniseriate with cusp shorter than lateral as long as, or longer than, denticles lateral denticles Small secondary denticles No small accessory denticles interspersed among lateral among lateral denticles of denticles of radular tooth — radular tooth Denticles on cutting edge of Denticles on cutting edge jaw in form of fine bristles, of jaw not bristled or bristled rodlets Of the 7 new species of MacFarland, 6 have the characteristic radular tooth shape and jaw denticulation of Trinchesia, while the remaining one has the radular tooth shape and jaw denticulation of Catriona (Figure 1). Therefore I propose that the following species be assigned to Trinchesia: abronia, albocrusta, flavovulta, fulgens, and virens, SPHON & Lance (1968) synonymized Cratena rutila MacFarianb, 1966 with Catriona lagunae (O’Donoc- HUE, 1926). Since C. lagunae cannot be included in Catriona because of its typical Trinchesia radular tooth shape and jaw denticulation, it must be transferred to Trinchesia as a comb. nov., Trinchesia lagunae (O’Donoc- HUE, 1926). As shown in Figure 1, the radular tooth shape and denticulation of the jaw of Catena spadix MacFarLanp, 1966 are obviously different from the remaining 6 species. Page 422 Radular Teeth Masticatory Border of Jaw Cratena rutila Cratena fulgens Cratena albocrusta Cratena flavovulta A X650 Cratena abronia Cratena virens Cratena Spadix Figure 1 Specific differences of the species assigned to Cratena by MacFarzanp, 1966 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 MacFar1anp (1966, p. 354) notes that the penial stylet of C. spadix is not “as in the allied forms.” This species was assigned to Catriona by EpmuNDs (1968). SPHON & Lance (1968) provided an “abbreviated syn- onymy” of certain of MacFarland’s 1966 species. One of these species was Cratena spadix MAcFarLanp, 1966 which they synonymized with Cuthona alpha BaBa & Hamatanl, 1963. The findings below support their syn- onymy. Lance, (1966) reported the collection of 6 specimens of Cuthona alpha from San Diego, Newport Harbor, and Santa Barbara, California All specimens were collected on boat landings in protected waters. The author collected 2 specimens of C. alpha on 9 February 1968 from boat landings in Morro Bay, California. They agreed with the description of the holotype of C. alpha as given by BaBa & Hamatant (1963). They also agreed with the descrip- tion of Cratena spadix MacFarLanp. Careful study of the descriptions of these two species showed them to be alike in almost all of their character- istics, but different in 2 important points: the presence or absence of a penial stylet, and differences in the masticatory margin of the jaw. MacFar.anp in 1966 described the penial stylet of Cratena spadix as a “thin-walled chitinous armature which does not project beyond the surface of the tip as in the allied forms.” BabA & HAMATANI (1963) described Cutho- na alpha as a “mosaic species which has the decided rad- ula type of Catriona on one hand, and the presumed penis peculiarity of Cuthona on the other hand.” Cuthona was described as having an unarmed penis. The authors ten- tatively placed the species in the genus Cuthona ALDER & Hancock, 1855. It appeared to the author that the 2 species might be synonymous, if Cuthona alpha did in fact possess a minute non-protruding stylet. This possibility was suggested to Dr. Baba, and upon re-examination (at high magnifica- tion) of paratype material he found a very short non-pro- truding stylet (personal communication). Epmunps (1968) characterizes Catriona WINCKWORTH, 1941 as having “‘denticles on cutting edge of jaw in the form of fine bristles . . . short, straight stylet on penis.” He assigned Cratena spadix to the genus Catriona and also proposed the possibility of the inclusion of Cuthona alpha in Catriona, “if details of the preradula and jaws were known, and if the genus were extended to include species without a penial stylet.” The presence of a stylet in Cuthona alpha makes the extension of the genus Catri- ona unnecessary in order to include this particular species. The masticatory margin of the jaw of Cratena spadix, as described by MacFartanp (1966) was very different from the remaining 6 species of Cratena he described Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Page 423 at the same time. The margin of C. spadix was listed as bearing “a series of transverse rod-like thickenings which project beyond the margin as closely set blunt rodlets or ridges laterally in contact with each other ... The rodlets are nearly straight near the hinge but become slightly curved as the tip is approached. At this tip, with high magnification, the surface seems to show minute spines.” In unpublished notes of MacFarland, a footnote by Mrs. MacFarland states, “With 5D magnification the sur- face of these rodlets at the lower end show a rough sur- face of minute spines. (Frank made one drawing).” This drawing (Figure 2) is reproduced herein for the purpose of augmenting MacFarLanp’s original description, since this drawing was not included in the monograph. Figure 2 Rodlets at lower end of masticatory margin of mandible (from unpublished notes of F.M. MacFarianp) Basa (personal communication) re-examined paratype material of Cuthona alpha, and found that the denticu- lations of the jaw edge “appeared as if they were covered with short, thick bristles.” Members of the genus Cuthona ALDER & HANcock, 1855, are considered to have no penial stylet. Since Cu- thona alpha is now known to have a short, straight stylet and bristled denticles on the jaw edge, the author pro- poses that the species be known by the new combination, Catriona alpha (BaBA & Hamatant, 1963). I would like to thank Dr. Kikutar6 Baba for his kind assistance in this study, and also Mr. Allyn G. Smith of the California Academy of Sciences who made it possible for me to use the unpublished notes of Dr. and Mrs. F M. MacFarland. LITERATURE CITED Basa, KikuTArO & Iwao HaMaTANI 1963. A cuthonid, Cuthona alpha n. sp., with a radula of Catriona type (Nudibranchia-Eolidoidea) . Publ. Seto Mar. Biol. Lab. 11 (2): 339 - 343; plt. 11 Burn, RosBert 1964. Descriptions of Australian Eolidacea (Mollusca: Opis- thobranchia). 2. The genera Nossis, Eubranchus, Trinchesia, and Toorna. Journ. Malacol. Soc. Austral. 8: 10 - 22; figs. 1-21 1968. Archidoris odhneri (MacFarianp, 1966) comb. nov., with some comments on the species of the genus on the Pacific Coast of North America. The Veliger 11 (2): 90 - 92 (1 October 1968) EpmMunps, MaLcoLm 1968. Eolid Mollusca from Ghana, with further details of West Atlantic species. Bull. Mar. Sci. 18 (1): 203 - 219; figs. 1-9 Lance, JAMES RoBERT 1966. New distributional records of some Northeastern Pacific Opisthobranchiata (Mollusca: Gastropoda) with descriptions of two new species. The Veliger 9 (1) : 69 - 81; 12 text figs. (1 July 1966) Lemcuer, HENNING 1964. Proposed stabilization of the generic name Trinchesia IneERING, 1879, and suppression under the plenary powers of Diaphoraeolis IREDALE « O’DonocuueE, 1923 (Class Gastro- poda). Z.N. (S.) 1106 Bull. Zool. Nomencl. 21 (1): 52 - 55 MacFarianp, Frank Mace 1966. Studies of opisthobranchiate mollusks of the Pacific Coast of North America. Mem. Calif. Acad. Sci. 6: xvi + 546 pp.; 72 plts. (8 April 1966) O’DonocHuE, CHARLES HENRY 1926. _A list of the nudibranchiate mollusca recorded from the Pacific coast of North America, with notes on their distribution. Trans. Roy. Canad. Inst. 15 (2): 199 - 247. Opinion 777 1966. Trinchesia InErinc, 1879 (Gastropoda), added to the Official List of Generic Names. Bull. Zool. Nomencl. 23 (2-3): 95-97 SpHON, Gate G., Jr. « James RoBert LANCE 1968. An annotated list of nudibranchs and their allies from Santa Barbara County, California. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. 36 (3): 73-84; 1 fig. (25 September 1968) WINCKWoRTH, RONALD 1941.. The name Cratena. 24 (4) :146 - 149 Proc, Malacol. Soc. London Page 424 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 An Annotated List of Opisthobranchs from San Luis Obispo County, California BY RICHARD A. ROLLER 1127 Seaward Street, San Luis Obispo, California 93401 AND STEVEN J. LONG 126 Esparto Avenue, Pismo Beach, California 93449 (1 Map) TO DATE VERY LITTLE INFORMATION has been published on the opisthobranchs of San Luis Obispo County, Califor- nia. MacFarianp (1925), Hanna (1951), and STEIN- BERG (1963a) have mentioned single species collected from the county. Lance (1961) and STEINBERG (1963b) in- clude the county within the scope of their distribution lists. However, most studies of California opisthobranchs have been done in the Dillon Beach, San Francisco Bay, and Monterey Bay areas to the north, and in the Santa Barbara, Laguna Beach, and San Diego areas to the south, leaving a gap in data for the central coast area. This list is an attempt to fill that gap and to add to the data recently reported by SPHON & LANcE (1968) for the southern bordering county, Santa Barbara. We have tried to continue their basic format, so that both lists may be used conveniently by workers of the central coast area. The present list, together with the lists of BRooksHIRE (1968a, 1968b) form a reasonably complete catalog of the molluscan fauna of San Luis Obispo County. Specimens were collected during field trips made by the authors, either jointly or separately, over a 2-year period. The entire coastline of the county was considered for possible collection sites, and 7 general localities were chosen (see Map, Figure 1). The coastline north of San Simeon is practically inaccessible except by boat, and only sandy beaches are found south of Shell Beach. Adjacent collecting sites of similar habitat were joined under one locality name. Most of the specimens were collected from the intertidal region; however, an attempt was made to include ecologically different regions (e. g., mud flats, boat docks) in the collections. «County Boundary 35°40’ San Simeon N Ria Piedras Blancas \Cayucos Pt. Estero “48; f \e Morro Bay p Nog a B San Luis Obispo Pe Rock Avila “<0.5 mm in cross-section. The eggs, averaging 0.1 mm in diameter, are very numerous, 50 or more being packed into a 4 mm segment of the long ribbon. The figures were drawn by Anne Acevedo of the San Diego Natural History Museum. LITERATURE CITED Lesour, M. V. 1944. The eggs and larvae of some prosobranchs from Ber- muda. Proc. Zool. Soc. London 114: 462 - 489 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 THE CALIFORNIA MALACOZOOLOGICAL SoctETyY, Inc. announces Backnumbers of THE VELIGER and other publications Volume 9: $22.- Volume 10: $24.- Volume 12: $24.- Volumes 1 through 8: out of print Supplement to Volume 3: $6.-* plus $-.50 handling charge [Part 1: Opisthobranch Mollusks of California by Prof. Ernst Marcus; Part 2: The Anaspidea of California by Prof. R. Beeman and The Thecosomata and Gymnosomata of the Cali- fornia Current by Prof. John A. McGowan] [The two parts are available separately at $3.- each plus a handling charge of $-.40 or as indicated above. If purchased separately, each part is subject to the Califor- nia State sales tax if mailed to California addresses. | Supplement to Volume 7: $2.-* plus $-.40 handling charge [Glossary of A Thousand-and-One Terms used in Conchology, compiled by WiniFrep H. ARNoLp] Supplement to Volume 11: $5.-* plus $-.40 handling charge [The Biology of Acmaea by Prof. D. P. Aszortr et al., ed.| Items marked with * are subject to sales tax in the State of California; residents of that State please add the appropriate amount to their remittances. Prices subject to change without notice. Send orders with remittance to: Mrs. Jean M. Cate, Manager, 12719 San Vicente Boule- vard, Los Angeles, Calif. 90049. Please, make checks payable to C. M.S., Inc. Shipments of material ordered are generally made within two wecks after receipt of remittance. Subscription to Volume 12: $18.- domestic; $19.- in Canada, Mexico, Central and South America; $19.50 in all other foreign countries. Backnumbers of the current volume will be mailed to new subscribers, as well as to those who renew late, on the first working day of the month following receipt of the remittance. The same policy applies to new members. Affiliate Membership for the fiscal year July 1, 1969 to June 30, 1970 has been set at $8.-. Postage for members in Canada, Mexico, Central and South America $1.-, for members in any other foreign country $1.50 additional. Vol. 11; No. 4 Membership open to individuals only - no institutional or society memberships. Please send for membership ap- plication forms to the Manager or the Editor. At a Regular Membership Meeting of the CaLirorNIA MatacozootocicaL Society, Inc. the following policies were adopted by unanimous vote: Effective January 1, 1967 there will be an initiation fee of $2.- for persons joining the Society. NOTE: No Insti- tutional Memberships are possible in the C. M.S., Inc. Members receive The Veliger free of further charges and are entitled to purchase one copy of any supplement pub- lished during the current membership year at a special discount (to be determined for each supplement). Membership renewals are due on or before April 15 each year. If renewal payments are made after April 15 but before March 15 of the following year, there will be a re-instatement fee of $1.-. Members whose dues pay- ments (including the re-instatement fee) have not been received by the latter date, will be dropped from the rolls of the Society. They may rejoin by paying a new initiation fee. The volume(s) published during the time a member was in arrears may be purchased, if still available, at the ~ regular full volume price plus applicable handling charges. Manuscripts received up to February 14 each year will be considered for publication in our July issue; May 14 is the deadline for the October issue, August 14 for the January issue and November 14 for the April issue. For very short papers of less than 500 words (including title, etc.) the deadlines are one month later than those given above, provided that these short notes are impor- tant enough to warrant preferential treatment. It is, how- ever, understood that submission of a manuscript before the dates indicated is not a guarantee of acceptance. ABOUT SUPPLEMENTS Many of our members desire to receive all supplements published by the Society. Since heretofore we have sent supplements only on separate order, some members have missed the chance of obtaining their copy through over- sight or because of absence from home. It has been sug- gested to us that we should accept “standing orders” from individuals to include all supplements published in the future. After careful consideration we have agreed to the proposal. We will accept written requests from individuals to place their names on our list to receive all future sup- plements upon publication; we will enclose our invoice THE VELIGER Page 443 at the same time. The members’s obligation will be only to pay promptly upon receipt of the invoice. Requests to be placed on this special mailing list should be sent to the Manager, Mrs. Jean M. Cate, 12719 San Vicente Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90049. RICE’S =) BURNING GAD a STRAW \DENGINE hh If your address is changed it will be important to notify us of the new address at least six weeks before the effective date, and not less than six weeks before our regular mailing dates. Because of a number of drastic changes in the regulations affecting second class mailing, there is now a sizeable charge to us on the returned copies as well as for our remailing to the new address. We are forced to ask our members and subscribers for reimbursement of these charges; further, because of increased costs in connection with the new mailing plate, we also must ask for reimbursement of that expense. Effective January 8, 1968 the following charges must be made: change of address — $1.- change of address and re-mailing of a returned issue — $2.-. We must emphasize that these charges cover only our actual expenses and do not include compensation for the extra work involved in re-packing and re-mailing returned copies. Because of the changed rules affecting second class mail matter, we will no longer be able to include the customary reminders in our January issue, nor can we attach any flyers to our journal henceforth. We shall, from now on, print a statement when dues-renewal time has arrived or announcements regarding special publi- cations in our Notes & News column. Page 444 BOOKS, PERIODICALS, PAMPHLETS Die europaischen Meeres-Gehauseschnecken (Prosobranchia) vom Eismeer bis Kapverden und Mittelmeer by Dr. Frirz NorpstEck. 1968. viii+273 pp.; 1200 line drawings on 31 plates; 16 color pictures on 4 plates. Hardcover, 48.- German marks; Gustav Fischer, publ., Stuttgart, West Germany. This book will be a most welcome addition to the malaco- logical library of museums as well as collectors in general. Although the scope of the work is limited to shell-bearing prosobranchs of the European seas (including the Medi- terranean), and although it excludes the pyramidellids (as these animals are now generally believed to be opistho- branchs), it still covers 1220 species and 180 subspecies and includes the descriptions of 5 new species and 7 new subspecies. While the worker who is not very con- versant with the German language may have some diffi- culties with the text, he will find the approximately 1200 line drawings, illustrating almost every species, of great help. The treatment of the species is thorough and consistent. Not only are all major taxa succinctly defined (i. e., super- families, families, subfamilies and genera, but in the latter case the type species is given, as well. The treatment of the species starts with the currently valid name, followed by synonyms, if any. Size indications and distribution data precede the diagnosis of the species. Color indication (for the animal), anatomical and radular characteristics are mentioned, where known or references to generally available literature are listed. In the opinion of this reviewer the unusually large store of important information contained in a very compressed form through the liberal use of abbreviations could be made more easily available to the non-German worker if a list of all abbreviations were appended, or, at least of some of the less commonly encountered ones, such as “idR.” which stands for “in der Regel” or, in English, “as a rule”. RS The Zoological Taxa of William Healey Dall by KENNETH J. Boss, JosEpH ROSEWATER & FLORENCE A. RuHorFrF. U. S. National Museum Bulletin 287: 427 pp., 1968. Available from Superintendent of Docu- ments, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 20402. Price: $2.50, paper cover. THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 William Healey Dall described and named a total of 5 427 taxa. Of these 5 302 belong to the mollusks. Many of Dall’s papers were published in periodicals that are now either very rare or difficult to find. The authors have made a careful compilation of all names created by Dall, omitting only the suprageneric taxa for very good reasons. In their introduction the authors stress that the list was compiled with a meticulous avoidance of rendering decisions, or even suggestions, as to the proper assignment of the various taxa, leaving this task for the specialist to do when they review one higher taxon or another. Of special value to the taxonomist is the account of Dall’s early work in which he indulged in practices that have caused much confusion. It might be stressed here, however, that Dall apparently adhered meticulously to the Rules of the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature after the Rules were established. The alphabetical arrangement of the taxa created by Dall make this book easy to use. It is not possible to overestimate the value of this work and it is no exaggera- tion when we say that it should be in the library of every serious student of malacology. The cost of the book can be this low only because it is produced by a non-profit making organization, the United States Government. RS The Shell. Five Hundred Million Years of Inspired Design by Hucu and Marcuerite Stix, and R. Tucker ABgort. Harry N. Abrams, Inc. $25.00; approx. 200 pp.; illus. This is a gorgeous art book that serves to present with a dramatic layout and design the beautiful diversity of shell characters possessed by the world of living mollusks. The 203 illustrations, including 82 hand-tipped plates in full color, are the creative photographic work of H. Landshoff. Dr. R. T. Abbott, the well known malacologist, collaborated with The Stixs, who are New York shell dealers, to provide a scientifically accurate commentary. This attractive, large volume is not only oriented to the general reader of natural history, but it will be especially welcomed by students of art and design in nature, and by the legion of avid shell collectors. WK. Emerson — Vol. 11; No. 4 THE VELIGER Page 445 The Helmet Shells of the World (Cassidae). Part I. - R. Tucker Assott. Indo-Pacific Mollusca, vol. 2, no. 9, 202 pp., 187 pls. Publ. by the Department of Mollusks, Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. $14.75. ALPHA taxonomy concerns itself with the characteriza- tion and naming of species and is often eclipsed by the more spectacular results of BETA and GAMMA taxonomy. But perhaps there should be an OMEGA taxonomy, an all- there-is-to-know level of the study of organic diversity. ApgotT’s paper is the OMEGA approach to a family of higher prosobranch gastropods to which have been ap- plied over a thousand names but which constitute about 60 living species. Part 1 of this monograph considers the genera Cassis, Cypraecassis, Phalium, and Casmaria. The world-wide coverage of the living species and the inclu- sive treatment of the many fossil species constitute an outstanding contribution to malacology. The most interesting aspect of this paper is its illustra- tion of the dynamics of evolution. In contrast to results of typological approaches of the past, this study reveals the probabilistic nature of biological phenomena and ex- poses species as natural entities in different stages of the evolutionary process. Species possess both spatial and tem- poral dimensions. Recent populations are the survivors of the past and some have stabilized a genetic system which permits little phenotypic divergence while others are spectacularly variable. The results of this paper show: 1. polytypic species of a wide distribution whose nearly indistinguishable subspecies are allopatrically separated by thousands of miles (Cypraecassis testiculus testiculus and C. t. senegalica; Phalium granulatum, P. g. centri- quadratum, and PR. g. undulatum) ; 2. species in the process of forming geographic isolates (incipient subspecies) with the ultimate prospect of gen- etic distinction and speciation (Phalium areola) ; 3. polytypic species whose rapid divergence has resulted in a fragmentation into ‘parapatric’ subspecies with vir- tually little isolation (C'asmaria erinaceus) ; 4. two species of Xenophalium with a broad spectrum of ecophenotypic and intrademe variation coupled with the possibility of introgressive hybridization. In general, the plates are excellent. The maps are of value for the immediate assessment of distributional data, but they should be referred to in the text under the respec- tive species. The information included on depth distribu- tion, bottom type preference and probable feeding habits is important. This work is uneven in the treatment accorded various taxa. Cenozoic European species and subspecies of the mamullaris (p. 55) and rondeleti (p. 97) complexes are discussed more thoroughly than some fossil Phalium (p. 152) and Galeodosconsia (p. 123) where the species are only listed. The use of a key to the species of Phalium s. s., but not to those of other genera and subgenera is unfor- tunate. The term ‘forma’ has no biological or evolutionary significance, and its usage in a modern taxonomic study is deplorable. ‘Type-information is now generally included in the syno- nymy ; it presents mistakes of omission: where is the type of menkrawitense BEETS?; the syntypes of Cassis pfeifferi are in the Madrid museum according to the caption to plate 111, but they are not mentioned in the paragraph on types of P bisulcatum, with which pfeifferi is synonymous. A more trenchant discussion of the genera, their phylo- genetic relationships and distinctiveness plus a diagnostic key to the Recent genera and subgenera should be included in the second portion of this monograph as should an expanded bibliography which includes all the papers cited in the text. The reviewer wonders how the same author who recog- nizes the great variation in Phalium bisulcatum and syn- thetically treats the Phalium coronadoi-wyvillei-pilsbryi species complex can then describe a new species, P kurodai (p. 105, pl. 87) which differs from the ecologically and geographically sympatric P carnosum (p. 104, pl. 86) by a mere number of knobs. An important error in type-setting occurs on p. 200. The remainder of the paragraph on Types and Records for Casmaria ponderosa nipponensis is found on p. 201, bottom of first column under C. ponderosa perryi. And the subspecies discussed under ponderosa are placed in the polytypic species ertnaceus in the captions on plate 14. Dr. Abbott is to be congratulated for a substantive con- tribution to the malacological literature. His study has shown that to obtain a modern systematic revision of a cosmopolitan family, research must be done on a world- wide basis and not be constricted by the parochialism which has characterized much systematic work. Kenneth J. Boss Page 446 THE VELIGER Vol. 11; No. 4 Oceans a monthly magazine, published by Jack C. Reynolds. Subscription $9.- from Oceans Magazine, P. O. Box 1820, La Jolla, California 92037. This new magazine, started in January 1969, is devoted to the lore of the oceans. It brings in popular language and with numerous black-and-white and excellent color illus- trations articles on many topics. As may be expected, the emphasis is not on mollusks, although this group of marine creatures is by no means neglected. An interesting feature of the magazine is the section entitled “Sea Squirts” - written primarily for the young reader, although of interest also to the layman in general. Another valuable section is the glossary appended to each issue in which scientifically accurate definitions of the technical terms used in the articles are given. Advertising is restricted to non-text pages, a commend- able arrangement. It is to be hoped that this will not be changed when increased circulation makes the magazine an attractive advertising medium. It would be deplorable to have an interesting account of salmon biology broken up by sales pitches for diving gear or underwater photo- graphy. As it is now, the magazine can be recommended to any one interested in any of the many thousands of problems connected with the oceans. RS A Checklist of the Marine Gastropods from the Puget Sound Region by Tuomas Rice. Of Sea and Shore, P. O. Box 33, Port Gamble, Washington 98364. Approximately 170 pp.; 4 maps with list of collecting stations; frontispiece. This mimeographed checklist is divided into an alphabet- ical list of species, occupying 138 pages; a bibliography of 9 pages; an index of 9 pages and a systematic list of 7 pages. Under each species in the first part of the list are given references, followed by indications of the range of the species; in most instances the type locality is also mentioned and usually collecting data in the Puget Sound area complete the entry. Where the author is aware of synonyms, he is careful to include them. A possible flaw in the list is the fact that, as stated in the introduction, “Not all specimens have been checked for the validity of the record, but those interested might contact those collectors listed in the “Collecting data” sec- tions in reference to particular species.” RS THE VELIGER is open to original papers pertaining to any problem concerned with mollusks. This is meant to make facilities available for publication of original articles from a wide field of endeavor. Papers dealing with anatomical, cytological, distri- butional, ecological, histological, morphological, physiological, taxonomic, etc., aspects of marine, freshwater or terrestrial mollusks from any region, will be considered. Even topics only indirectly concerned with mollusks may be acceptable. It is the editorial policy to preserve the individualistic writing style of the author; therefore any editorial changes in a manuscript will be submitted to the author for his approval, before going to press. Short articles containing descriptions of new species or other taxa will be given preferential treatment in the speed of publication provided that arrangements have been made by the author for depositing the holotype with a recognized public Museum. Museum numbers of the type specimens must be included in the manuscript. Type localities must be defined as accurately as possible, with geo- graphical longitudes and latitudes added. Short original papers, not exceeding 500 words, may be published in the column “NOTES and NEWS’; in this column will also appear notices of meetings of regional, national and international malacological organizations, such as A.M. U., U. M. E., W.S. M., etc., as well as news items which are deemed of interest to our Members and subscribers in general. Articles on “METHODS and TECH- NIQUES” will be considered for publication in another column, provided that the information is complete and techniques and methods are capable of duplication by anyone carefully following the description given. Such articles should be mainly original and deal with collecting, preparing, maintaining, studying, photographing, etc., of mollusks or other invertebrates. A third column, entitled “INFORMA- TION DESK,” will contain articles dealing with any problem pertaining to collecting, identifying, etc., in short, problems encountered by our readers. In contrast to other contributions, articles in this column do not necessarily contain new and original materials. Questions to the editor, which can be answered in this column, are invited. The column “BOOKS, PERIODICALS, and PAMPHLETS” will attempt to bring reviews of new publications to the attention of our readers. Also, new timely articles may be listed by title only, if this is deemed expedient. Manuscripts should be typed in final form on a high grade white paper, not exceeding 81” by 11”, at least double spaced and accompanied by a clear carbon or photo copy. A pamphlet with detailed suggestions for preparing manuscripts intended for publication in THE VELIGER is available to authors upon request. A self-addressed envelope, sufficiently large to accommodate the pamphlet (which measures 514” by 81%’’), with double first class postage, should be sent with the request to the Editor. EDITORIAL BOARD Dr. Donatp P. Assott, Professor of Biology Hopkins Marine Station of Stanford University Dr. Jerry DonouueE, Professor of Chemistry University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, and Research Associate in the Allan Hancock Foundation University of Southern California, Los Angeles Dr. J. Wyatr Duruam, Professor of Paleontology University of California, Berkeley Dr. E. W. Facer, Professor of Biology Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla University of California at San Diego Dr. Cavet Hanp, Professor of Zoology and Director, Bodega Marine Laboratory University of California, Berkeley Dr. G Datias Hanna, Curator Department of Geology California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco Dr. Jorn W. Hepcretu, Resident Director Marine Science Laboratory, Oregon State University Newport, Oregon Dr. Leo G. HERTLEIN, Curator of Invertebrate Paleontology California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Dr. Rupotr STOHLER, Research Zoologist University of California, Berkeley Dr. A. Myra KEEN, Professor of Paleontology and Curator of Malacology Stanford University, Stanford, California Dr. Victor Loosanorr, Professor of Marine Biology Pacific Marine Station of the University of the Pacific Dr. Joun McGowan, Associate Professor of Oceanography Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla University of California at San Diego Dr. Frank A. Pire.xa, Professor of Zoology University of California, Berkeley Me. Attyn G. Smirn, Associate Curator Department of Invertebrate Zoology California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco Dr. Ratpu I. Smiru, Professor of Zoology University of California, Berkeley Dr. Cuarwes R. StasEx, Associate Professor . of Zoology Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida Dr. Donatp M. Witson, Professor of Biology Department of Biological Sciences Stanford University, Stanford, California ASSOCIATE EDITOR Mrs. Jean M. Cate Los Angeles, California QO NG ] 2 “Rays “yy 2 ‘Sarpy = J 2 NN =i Ne J 2 \ NS o Say m Says 2 Vfl m onoe” 2 ns m NY D Says mm Me nies = 2) cS wn = O- HSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI NVINOSHLINS S3IYVYE!IT LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN N zg 2 : ene g g oe) So 32 YY S Wek = S z : é BYIT BRR 8 : g FE 2 2 “fy = Noe re Z| = > > = Rees = > 7) Zz =. oe Hae 77) ps a SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILALILSNI Sat1yvydi z = Zz (e) 7) Ze Ss = 7) ” = 7) = @ = ae ” = | = a = 4 = 4 AN = =o < = oe = =z = Ws fe a4 ox S oc Ss ox c XN NS o c | Se : : 8 : 2 ee ey = “ THSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILALILSNI SA!luvusdiT LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Ni = (e) = ‘ Cw 1 Vy oo = ow = ow = pe =a ey ae 5 Zu =) 2 5 U4, ® = Up fi > = = z S Kies ey / ae ae Le = Fe 2. Lee ipa ee Leen si Z a vz m 2 m 24 7) < = 7) = 7) = JOSHLINS Saruvugia LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILMLILSNI NVINOSHLINS Saluvuaiq. LIE oe eh Seat 2 ee = Es = 5 = Wy, 2 S Vi > Se yy ‘dy, g : g : i WG? g V a z = z = 2 2 Y ff Ce 2S /*" em , > — ) ey = a s z a pa a 5 a | HSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI_NVINOSHLIWS _LIBRARI ES _ INSTITUTION . i Snes i fr uw ies uw Pees we YU iy, ° = aS z 4 2 “ = | Yip. — oc 3 oe — o Bet oa Lae a 2° NY a 2 ae a a | Z 5 > mo. — S zy Zz NS a S = g = . . od + | Saluvudit LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI NVINOSHLINS S3IYVYUEIT LIB Z gi S c cS Cee z _ nae ° loa) = ve aw — ow iS) wo Ss a > 47. a Ss 2 a a4 =) > = sf, db > - > ‘ = > | es co = Wy 2 Ee Zz E 24 f z 0 “Use mn SG = a ‘s 3 = n == ” = on. THSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILALILSNI NVINOSHLINS S3JIYVYUEIT LIBRARIES N z an wo e g = Ron g z oO. ke > = i = JOSHLIWS a INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI_ NVINOSHLINS S3iuvaaly_& Z < < eh a = Ws < — NY = 1 hy, Pe : Z : 2 \. i Y? 2 YY. g : 8 2 WN 3 HZ ? Ot 2 z Ee Zz = AS zi YD fe on Ziyi ee aes >" = cae SE >" = > = Zs aS 77) 79) cas ze n yes ” THSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILMLILSNI_NVINOSHLINS S31YVYGI1 LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION By u 2 My tu if vei wh N el // ee NI! CASTIT ES N ““.oTITL _ slhPn ee ~ > er, CY 7714 Aus CGA B Neaws7 im Ness ee = VINOSHLINS. S31UVu rig: J, oy On nC (dp) Cintas» m i = ILSNI N Ph oa a eS INSTITUTION | NOILNL = 2 ; =H z < = .< = es z ee As - z x 2 g “yy > 1 Wtf 5 ANN 2B) fe) = = 147 fe) ny bye 3c Ni ES = J = Zz - 2 ay 2 \ : B . Bete este menlan wertiu = = = a 2 INOSHLINS S31YVYaIT_ n Zz “amrisoman = NSTITUTION” WounLILSNI= & “ 2 mI pie wn Pe ud o ASS z = x 5 c Pe : Qo = e = S i AAU NO a 4 nip = = ) [tg = “a S) ons ON ~ NOILALILSNI NVINOSHLINS | SI a. @ = 4 1ES~ SMITHSONIAN” INSTITUTI z es re) A s~saiuvualt LIBRAR = p iS o Gi = |_NVINOSHLIWS _ ie 5) py, = 2 We 5 2 2 "| Gy ° 2 2 WWE ow = 0 =) “ye Fi > as oS KS 2 2 = © LO ; = WY G a . LAB ee > ” pa T 2 o m 2 egruyua 1 t!8RARIES suiTAsoNiaN= INSTITU m Zz 2) ~ NVINOSHLIWS ore g ao ” = NOILNLILSNI o : = _ SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION 7 z 2 Se = zZ g os = Wy, 2 2 S j - 3 2 Ng 3 G7 3 : = Z E i DD) oe AN a YE be <= Z = > = o 2 S IW fe) Y fh Qe Fes = = > ” 8 le NS z=» = = a) NVINOSHLINS fs = aS = ES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION i = ta Be SS3IYVYSIT LIBRAR a > g o 2 |_ NVINOSHLIW in S G Ue: 7 i 4 e be Ww oy re Gly, al = c WOK & al a = < V fos ec a : ay at _< e « WF VA as eal 9 OS a & oe = ca Ss oh ITUT 5 = S$ 5 2 17 LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN _INST S 4 i W_NVINOSHIINS S31uV¥a17_ Zz = . INSTITUTION NOILALILSNI z = S) o } - = = A ° oe ie a zg & fe) wo SN ia 0 a > Ee 2 > = Es a Oo m “ P le eo) load = z= o i (op) - —_ 2 Joainvaeliotinnan esesumison an = werirur 2 < 5 tty | Zz Roe < = bs “fl = LY yy (Og CIPI 2 CO: % 5 bY 2 We fe = 2 YY = > YD ‘ = = ee = > 9 hints 7 = 2 2 ILSNI_NVINOSHLINS S31uVugIT~ a 2 ir INSTITUTION NOILAL a 7 o Zz Ww +0 3 SMITHSONIAN _ - Bee ae o = = 12) Fe a) o ASN = = Ss zd = WY S a = <4 Cc [3 ies o = Ac = BeOS & fe Aw 2 Ly aa — = EWI AVINGEHUNe Sone da = = Jw eS” = 2 NOILNLILSNI_ NVI n : / Seaateeronanes®outnaneminon ae ee wet i, meet wm: 3 za SONG — AwWewro “ x. ~«x- ” O