6611 LuYOdad 14N THE PROBLEM Conduct tests to determine which cables are most suitable for oceanographic applications. RESULTS 1. Extensive tests were conducted on 14 cables now in general use for marine operations, to determine their resistance to elastic and rotational stretch. 2. The 3 x 19 cable was found to have characteristics that would favor its use for sensitive oceanographic problems when compared with the other cables tested. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. On the basis of the evaluation reported here, consider the 3 x 19 cable the most suitable of those now available for pre- cision oceanographic applications. 2. In future procurement of oceanographic cables, conduct similar tests on sample lengths before adopting any new types. 3. Continue investigation of new cable designs for oceano- graphic use. HANAN 0 0301 0040531 e2 ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION Work was performed under SR 004 03 01, Task 0539 (NEL 14-1). The report covers work from March 1952 to September 1963 and was approved for publication 13 November 1963. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... page 5 FACTORS IN CABLE EFFECTIVENESS... 5 HAZARDS TO CABLE IN OCEANOGRAPHIC OPERATIONS... 7 Corrosion. ..7 Abrasion... 8 Stretch. ..9 Rotation... 9 TEST PROCEDURE ...1210 SUMMARY... 722 TABLES 1 Major Characteristics of Principal Cable Materials ... page 13 2-15 Results of Tests for Stretch Characteristics... 25=31 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1-2 Tractor and fittings used for raising and lowering test cables... page 32, 33 Hanger and weights used for loading cable. . . 34 4000-1b load on 3 X 31 wire rope of 21/64" diameter... 35 4000-lb load secured to cable test specimen. . . 36 Magnified views of Mohole cable and 3 X 31 wire TAOS Gg a SPY INTRODUCTION Wire rope has important applications in industry for holding, towing, and lifting, and much has been done to improve its qual- ity and dependability. It has equal importance in oceanographic work. Deep mooring by the taut-wire technique, coring and dredging, under-water photography, and sampling of water, bot- tom materials, and biological life, are only a few of the oceano- graphic activities which require the use of cables and which pre- sent new and rigorous demands upon the strength, flexibility, and general reliability of the wire used in their construction. These demands increase as oceanographic investigations continue to in- volve greater depths and longer periods of submersion. Whereas in most industrial applications both ends of a cable are firmly se- cured, oceanographic operations require suspension and subse- quent maneuvering of a weight on the end of a line which is capable of stretching and rotating as the load is lowered into the water. The destructive effect of the ocean environment upon cable mate- rial adds to the problem of selecting wire rope of optimum char- acteristics for marine operations. The investigation reported here was undertaken to determine which cables, of the many types now available, are most suitable for oceanographic applications. FACTORS IN CABLE EFFECTIVENESS The basic requirements for any cable are strength and flex- ibility. The cables used in oceanographic operations require spe- cial characteristics in addition to the basic strength necessary to handle heavy loads. Corrosion, magnetic properties, conditions of shock, abrasion, vibration, and extremes of temperature are all potential sources of damage, premature wear, and unsatisfac- tory performance. These hazards must be considered in any choice of marine cable. Both the materials used and the method by which a cable is fabricated are factors in its suitability. Table 1 summarizes the pertinent characteristics of several materials which are in wide use in the manufacture of wire rope. It will be noted that these materials vary in effectiveness, depending upon the application for which they are considered. The method by which the cable is constructed strongly in- fluences its ability to meet the rigorous demands of oceanographic operations. Two common types of construction are the Warring- ton and the Seale configurations, both consisting of two layers of wire about a central wire: six wires in the inner layer and twelve © in the outer. The Warrington varies from the Seale by using large and small wires alternately in the outer layer; the Seale construc- tion uses the same size throughout. The Seale type yields a f smoother surface which reduces friction and resulting abrasion; | - and the presence of smaller wires in its outer layer increases | flexibility and therefore reduces bending stresses, especially | when the cable is being operated over sheaves of small diameter. The strength of a wire rope increases with its size and with the excellence of the material (especially the core material) of which itis made. The strength offered by any method of construc- tion will vary with the metallic area involved and the basic strength of the wire used. If a cable is made with an independent metallic core or inner strand it will be somewhat stiffer than a similarly constructed rope with a fiber core but, when heavy loads and high radial pressures are involved, may offer greater strength and re- sistance to bending fatigue. In many applications the fiber-core wire rope is satisfactory or even preferable, as when it must con- form to the diameter of a small sheave or drum. The flexibility of a wire rope is a function of its "lay," or the manner in which the strands are joined or twisted, and also depends upon whether or not the wire is preformed. The com- monly used Lang lay produces a cable with large cover wires and. the same number of wires in the outside layers as in the inside layer. If the helical angle of the wire wrap is kept tight with a small angle from the normal to the cable, flexibility will decrease. A long lay will tend to increase the flexibility up to a point where, | 7 if too great a load is placed on the core of a cable, its strength will be reduced. The flexibility of a wire rope of fixed diameter also in- creases with the number of wires or strands used in its con- struction, with the size of the individual strands decreasing proportionately. HAZARDS TO CABLE IN OCEANOGRAPHIC OPERATIONS Cable used in oceanographic operations must meet rigorous demands, imposed both by the ocean environment itself and by the nature of the work in which the cable is used. The principal haz- ards to the cable are as noted briefly here. Corrosion Constant exposure to sea water has a corrosive effect upon cable, first appearing as microscopic pitting which cannot be de- tected without powerful magnification. The pits act like little keys; as they develop they restrict the action of the cable ele- ments, creating stress concentration points, rapidly diminishing the flexibility of the cable, and reducing its ability to withstand impact loads and shock. Corroded rope creates a serious hazard not only to the equipment being handled but to the persons using it. Frequent inspection and regular lubrication are imperative, as by the time the corrosive effect becomes visible it is too late to take preventive action. Generally, corrosion attacks wire rope on the exposed sur- face of the wire first and, when this is the case, it is readily ap- parent. However, it is possible for corrosion to develop inside the wire rope before any evidence is visible on the outside. This has been found to be the result of a lubricating practice which has been adequate to keep the outside of the rope coated but has been insufficient to prevent the loss of the original lubricant from in- side the cable and has permitted moisture to penetrate it. Abrasion Abrasion and other forms of wear generally appear to pro- gress very rapidly on a new rope, since only a small surface of the wires is exposed to abrading objects. However, as worn sur- faces develop on the wire crowns, the wear is distributed over a larger area of contact and the apparent rate of abrasion decreases. On regular lay ropes, the wearing action causes a loss of metal from the crowns of the outside wires and small, elliptical flat surfaces develop. A constant contributor to wear is the peening action produced when the wire rope is subjected to short, sharp blows against sta- tionary or moving objects such as small track rollers on a ship. This type of abuse causes some loss of metal from the wires, but its principal damage is the deformation of their original circular shape. The speed with which the wire rope is handled is a very im- portant factor in its wearing qualities. Any section of rope oper- ating over a sheave makes two complete bends (one when it con- forms to the sheave groove and another when straightened). These changes in curvature require rapid movement of the wires and strands, and materially influence their bending fatigue. In general, the safety of a working load is determined by the same conditions which contribute to abrasion and corrosion: the weight of the applied load, the speed of operation and of accelera- tion and deceleration, the length of the wire rope used, and the number, size, and location of sheaves and drums. Stretch Stretching is a propensity of wire rope which must be taken into account in selecting and using marine cables. When drops to precise depths are required, a lengthening of the cable could re- sult in erroneous data. Also, long cables could be weakened to a point where critical instrumentation could be lost or subsurface buoys would gradually rise to the surface as the cable unwound. There are two types of wire rope stretch: (1) elastic stretch, which is a function of the elastic properties of the material of which the rope is made, and which is recoverable in accordance with Hooke's law; and (2) constructional stretch, which is caused by the progressive adjustment of the individual wires moving to seat themselves more firmly into the cable structure. Construc- tional stretch is not recoverable and will manifest itself, during the first few times the cable is loaded, to a degree depending upon the severity of the loading. Corrosion and rope stretch, as discussed above, may be considered mechanical problems, which depend largely upon the composition and construction of the wire rope. There are other aspects of the corrosion and wear problems, such as electrolytic corrosion and the effects of sheave and drum action, but these all point mainly to proper selection and maintenance of the cable. Rotation A further problem which exists in the use of wire rope in oceanographic operations is that of rotation. When a weight is suspended from a ship, the cable supporting it becomes a free body able to rotate at will. Such rotation causes an unlay of the wires composing the cable and could, if permitted to proceed far enough, reduce its strength capability to the breaking point and cause the loss of both cable and load. The personal hazards in- volved are obvious. A further undesirable effect of the rotation is that it opens the cable structure and allows entry of sea water, thus hastening corrosion of the core and inner wrap wires. 10 Rotation of the wire rope is a function of its helical con- struction, and the direction in which it rotates depends upon the direction in which the strands are laid. Length of cable and weight of loading determine the degree of rotational stretch which will be produced. TEST PROCEDURES Conducting a study at sea to gather the information sought in this evaluation would require operation of a test vessel with in- strumentation which would be prohibitively expensive. The manu- facturers of wire rope and cable were not able to supply directions for such an investigation, and since no A.S.T.M. standards or guide lines were available, the test procedure to be described was developed empirically at NEL. NEL towers were used to support a length of cable. Gener- ally 120 feet of cable was used so that one end could be secured in the tower. The working length was 100 feet, suspended to within 5 or 6 feet of the ground. A drag or brake system was used to regulate the twist, from unwind to rewind, to the speed at which it was estimated the cable would be turning in the sea, and to sim- ulate the drag it would encounter in sea water. Count was made of rotational turns from unwind to wind. Other tests were made, on longer lengths of cable, by securing sheaves at different levels in the tower and, by means of a winch from a tractor, raising and lowering the weights to distribute a load over the required length of cable (figs. 1-6). To determine the amount of stretch for any given load, the cable length was measured before addition of a weight and again after it was completely ''relaxed" under the addi- tional load. Each cable was tested under these conditions to determine the elastic stretch and rotational effect when known loads were applied to a given length of cable. The test results are summa- rized in tables 2-15 which indicate the amount of elongation produced by suspension with various loads and the amount of "'re- turn" to original length, both immediately after release of weights and as measured after the cables were removed from the test lo- cation, coiled, and allowed to relax for several hours or days. 11 12 SUMMARY On the basis of the extensive tests reported here, the 3 X 19 cable is considered the most suitable of those now available for oceanographic applications, from the standpoint of its resistance to elastic and rotational stretch. In future procurement of marine cables, any new types under consideration should be similarly tested before adoption. New cable designs should be investigated as they are developed. Material Blue center steel Composition Finest quality im- proved plow steel TABLE 1. Applications Fabricated into ropes for uses requiring optimum strength, toughness and uniformity MAJOR CHARACTERISTICS OF PRINCIPAL CABLE MATERIALS Advantages Disadvantages Can withstand heavy loads, severe abrasion, shock, and vibration Plow steel a Steel ropes Traction steel Iron ropes +— Designed especially for elevator cables High strength; unusual toughness High resistance to bending fatigue; shows minimum wear over sheaves and drums Comments All cables should be prop- erly lubricated before immersion and carefully rinsed with fresh water after using in sea water Advantages exceeded only by those of blue center grade Is of exceptionally high quality Low carbon steel Stainless steel Phosphor bronze rope 18 chromium, 8 nickel Principally used for wire ropes in marine and air- craft applications and in industrial uses where excessive environments are to be encountered Tin-copper alloy Used mainly when loads are light Low in strength compared to other steel grades Corrosion resistant when material is properly chosen and treated for expected environment Inferior to carbon steel in stress fatigue Recommended for situa- tions requiring frequent submersion and removal rather than continuous submersion Effectively resists certain types of corrosion; is nonmagnetic Has little resistance to abrasion; low fatigue life 13 { ig wart i pl ni 3 oe s ani ve Ate i sp i ' ar nis Phan tot idddoomeorbiandalets wets cERly At bi Fan ah dae ite pW et rae Bey ues eyo Dig . | ek io Sere | Ret Sane ad ees SS KGa one 4 Se a ie ae a bags) velit autuetialaiad tab we \ ; j p by 4 higew aru a a 1 ; 1 alles Mla ea pail a pinata eae Asp 6 Rela a aste if >" f ‘ ; ; h j Pit iaeee tens: ceccale emit ° ia an Sin rahe ae eee ree me he srhny bhp i rem ney hth 7p Fig wt aay ml A o x " Y pie le Ween stannic te ary nat ‘Deotab johonegttnededt ihn PRE Pee OY eur | gene, sul ratory fe teiolan 1: ae ee se ae ea Lebpisp iat | : | f yw saa iy nahi Lind ‘ajar Auta "ae hice Swastika) Wes 4} : ferar(iteo 'S a wistie eee in yi a a Ay ff citevideinn hve NriRIatiKe | tae t) i: Ba yadstierenies at at aya | ‘d es ; en forme oo ceil rete wt. fates na en ee ee i fe eee, oe | aot hinds yieebgerty' sh wey hy oa until Ais fei) aa. fp trendy Sa tate ras % 14 TABLE 2. TEST FOR TOTAL STRETCH OF 0.170" DIA. CABLE (50-FT LENGTH) Number of Turns To Unwind Load released To Wind Cable removed from tower, coiled in 2-ft circle, allowed to relax for 175 hr at 70°F. Cable measured; it had returned to original length and was in good condition. 15 TABLE 3. TEST FOR TOTAL STRETCH OF 0.170" DIA. CABLE (150-FT LENGTH) Number of Turns Time Load To To {From Start} Stretch (lb) | Unwind Wind (hr) in. /50 ft) Notes 1000 Test cable up in the control tower through three sheaves. Elastic stretch at loading. Load raised 50 feet Load lowered 50 feet Total elongation 26.5" 500 7" relaxation Load raised 50 feet Load lowered 50 feet HL 05 When the final increment of load was released and the cable re- laxed for 48 hours, the cable was back to its original length. 16 TABLE 4. TEST FOR TOTAL STRETCH OF 3 X 19E (0.217"' DIAMETER) GALVANIZED MONARCH CABLE (150-FT LENGTH) Number of Turns Time Load To To |From Start} Stretch (Ib) | Unwind Wind (hr) in. /50 ft) Notes 1500 0 72 The load was raised for 48 hours then lowered to distribute the loading equally in all sec- 120 tions of the cable. This resulted in an additional elongation of 7.0". When com- pared to the stretch in 120 hours with the same load, the effects of sheave resistance are striking. 1000 192 240 2. 3B} 500 264 336 1.5 408 0.67 456 17 TABLE 5. TEST FOR TOTAL STRETCH OF WIRE CABLE 7 X 19 (150-FT LENGTH) Number of Turns Time Load To To |From Start} Stretch (Ib) | Unwind Wind (hr) (in. /50 ft Notes 1500 0 Data required were limited to stretch characteristics after preload; therefore, the prelim- inary stretch measurement was not taken. Load raised 75 feet 48 Load lowered 75 feet 90.5 40.3 11.0 U2 168 1000 23.3 358 1.3 6.12 Load raised 75 feet 192 Load lowered 75 feet 240 21.6 Bod! 312 18 TABLE 5. (Continued) Number of Turns Time Load To To |From Start} Stretch (Ib) | Unwind Wind (hr) (in. /50 ft) Notes 500 42.3 6.3 i, 6 1.3 5. 03 Load raised 75 feet 360 4,95 Load lowered 75 feet 408 3.81 0.8 0.3 4,65 480 4.67 0 504 1.04 Upon release of the last 500 lb, the wire cable twisted and curled considerably. There was a per- manent stretch of 3.13 inches. 19 TABLE 6. TEST FOR STRETCH CHARACTERISTICS OF PRELOADED WIRE CABLE 3 X 19D, SPECIMEN 474, 3/32" DIAMETER, REEL 34893 (100-FT LENGTH) Number of Turns Time Load To To |From Start] Stretch (Ib) | Unwind Wind (hr) (in. /50 ft) Notes 292 Bio BS! 0 Data required were limited to Load raised 50 feet 48 stretch characteristics after Load lowered 50 feet 72 preload; therefore, the prelimi- 67.5 nary stretch measurement was 20.0 not taken. To® 4.5 144 196 As the load was lightened, the 10.5 reduction in elongation extended Load raised 50 feet 192 negatively from the initial Load lowered 50 feet 288 measurement. 312 100 Load raised 50 feet 336 Load lowered 50 feet 360 115), © 6.0 384 -2.12 0 0.00 No permanent stretch. 20 TABLE 7. TEST FOR STRETCH CHARACTERISTICS OF PRELOADED WIRE CABLE 7 X 7D, SPECIMEN 475, 3/32" DIAMETER, REEL 34894 (100-FT LENGTH) Number of Turns Time Load To To |From Start] Stretch (Ib) | Unwind Wind (hr) (in. /50 ft Notes 292 0 Data required were limited to 10.0 stretch characteristics after 1.0 preload; therefore, the prelimi- Load raised 50 feet 48 nary stretch measurement was Load lowered 50 feet 72 not taken. 37.0 168 196 As the load was lightened, the Load raised 50 feet 192 reduction in elongation indicated Load lowered 50 feet 216 a zero elongation at 100 lb. 18.75 2.9 240 100 Load raised 50 feet 264 Load lowered 50 feet 336 360 -1.66 0 0.12 Permanent stretch. 21 TABLE 8. TEST FOR STRETCH CHARACTERISTICS OF PRELOADED STANDARD B.T. CABLE SPECIMEN 476, WIRE CABLE, 3/32" DIAMETER (100-FT LENGTH) Number of Turns Time Load To To |From Start} Stretch (Ib) | Unwind Wind (hr) in. /50 ft) Notes 292 0 Data required were limited to stretch characteristics after preload; therefore, the prelimi- nary stretch measurement was not taken. 0), 75 2.47 Load raised 50 feet 48 Load lowered 50 feet 120 4.0 4.00 14.25 196 42.25 4.0 Load raised 50 feet 144 Load lowered 50 feet Bo ZNO) 168 100 39.0 As the load was lightened, the 6.5 reduction in elongation indicated 2.0 0.35 a zero elongation at 100 pounds. Load raised 50 feet 240 0.35 Load lowered 50 feet 9.0 264 3.0 0) 0 288 iL, OS} Permanent stretch. 22 TABLE 9. TEST FOR TOTAL STRETCH OF H.I. WIRE CABLE (100-FT LENGTH) Number of Turns Time Load To To | From Start} Stretch (lb) | Unwind Wind (hr) (in. /50 ft Notes (Hanger) 39 230 0 0.78 Lo 8} 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 0.8 1.0 0.65 No rotation 72 423 1.53 4,29 3.79 3.50 3.90 3.33 3.25 3.25 3.00 3.00 2.86 2.76 2.62 2.50 1.55 No rotation 144 5 23 TABLE 9. (Continued) Number of Turns Time Load To To |From Start] Stretch (Ib) | Unwind Wind (hr) (in. /50 ft) Notes 616 as PAON 7c BH0) 216 Pag yy 809 2.90 4.25 Bio A) No rotation 312 Bia Za 1004 35 18 7.00 5.30 5) 2B) 5.00 4,88 4,795 4,50 4.50 3. 94 No rotation 384 4.10 No rotation 480 4,42 24 TABLE 9. (Continued) Number of Turns Time Load To To | From Start} Stretch (lb) | Unwind Wind (hr) (in. /50 ft 809 576 3.68 5 LS 88 3.62 rotation 648 615 63 .38 rotation 744 423 i BS 0.30 5.00 5.00 4,75 4.63 4.50 2.47 No rotation 816 Ph, BND) Notes 25 TABLE 9. Number of Turns Load To (tb) | Unwind 230 5.00 4.50 AL 25) No rotation (Hanger) 39 | No rotation (Hanger) 26 (Continued) Time To |From Start] Stretch Wind (hr) (in. /50 ft) 1.35 5.63 4.75 4.38 1.75 912 1.53 1.06 1296 0.94 Notes Permanent stretch. The cable shows excellent characteristics in resisting rotation under vari- ous loads. The elastic stretch reached 8.44 inches with a 1000-lb load. TABLE 10, TEST FOR TOTAL STRETCH OF 0.123" DIA. STRANDED CABLE (100-FT LENGTH) Number of Turns Load To To Stretch (Ib) Unwind Wind (in. /50 ft) Notes Test 1. 39.0 134.5 Bo 1 0,35) 6.50 2.00 After rotating to still condition 0.47 Test 2. 39.0 760.0 82.00 Zeit 60.75 93.20 40.00 3.32 Left hanging overnight 3.40 39.75 3on2D 27.90 5 AG) UY, .00 . 00 .00 3.88 Test 3. 134.5 291 1195.5} 149.0 70.75 62.25 54.00 47.00 40,25 34.25 28.29 22.75 These tests were made for com- US parison with those shown in After rotating to still condition 7.10 |table 11 for 0.250" dia. cable. 27 TABLE 11. Load (Ib) Test 1, 39.0 Test 3. 39.0 1198.5 28 TEST FOR TOTAL STRETCH OF 0.250" DIA. STRANDED CABLE (100-FT LENGTH) Number of Turns To Unwind iL After rotating to still condition 21. 20. 18. ie 16. 15. 14, 13. 172i. After rotating to still condition 50 50 75 25 25 25 00 00 29 50 To Wind 20.25 19.00 17.75 16.75 15.50 14.50 13.75 13.00 12,25 No rotation 30. 20. 24, 22. 20. After rotating to still condition 50 00 00 25 79 27.00 25.00 23.25 21,50 Stretch in. /50 ft) Notes 0.25 0.68 1.39 These tests were made for com- parison with those shown in PB. IG} table 10 for 0.123" dia. cable. TABLE 12. TEST FOR TOTAL STRETCH OF BLACK POLYETHYLENE-COVERED STEEL CABLE (100-FT LENGTH) Number of Turns Time Load To To |From Start Stretch (Ib) Unwind Wind (hr) (in. /50 ft) Notes 39.0 521.0 Special consecutive hourly measurements were made on one day to determine the effect of temperature on the length measurement. No effect was noted. 714.5 After rotating to still condition 905.0 2.65 168 2.78 13.75 11,50 10.50 9.50 After rotating to still condition 2.92 |The total stretch was 6 in/100' of cable; of this, 1-13/16" was due to unwinding of the cable under load. This rotational stretch was approximately 30% of the total stretch. No rotation 240 3.00 29 TABLE 13. TEST FOR TOTAL STRETCH OF PACIFIC TEST ROPE 7971A, 3 X 36, SUPERSTEEL GALVANIZED, REGULAR LAY 3/8" DIAMETER (100-FT LENGTH) To Unwind The lack of rotation is a unique characteristic. TABLE 14. TEST FOR TOTAL STRETCH OF 1 X 19 BETHANIZED FORMSET AIR- CRAFT STRAND, 7/32" DIAMETER, WIRE ROPE, USED FOR THE MOHOLE PROJECT (100-FT LENGTH) Time From Start} Stretch Number of Turns To To Unwind Wind Load gob (ever) Due to the urgency of this 4000 problem no intermediate 42 loading was required. This cable was tested for a specific 1.5 4 application. 30 TABLE 15. TEST FOR TOTAL STRETCH OF 3 X 31 WARRINGTON SCALE WIRE ROPE, 21/64" DIAMETER (100-FT LENGTH) Number of Turns Load To (Ib) Unwind 4000 89 (slight braking action) 2.12 1,25 0.33 0.84 No rotation To Wind 3 0.33 Time From Start} Stretch (hr) (in. /50 ft) 0 LY) 5.81 24 6.25 6.25 48 6.28 72 6.28 96 6.28 168 6.28 336 6.28 Notes This is considered a prelimi- nary test. Due to excessive rotational stretch further test- ing was deemed unnecessary. 31 —— TEST CABLE é ( / ‘ ( f ( é ‘ ( ( { Figure 1. Fittings for securing CAMLE « 32 TERT RTE ars rea, Pigure 2, Lraccvop Gnd Mine UVSed jor PaVS Tig and lowering test cable. 33 34 Figure 3. Hanger and weights used for IOGEMEAG CGO - Wile tases A ay 4000-1b load on 3 X 31 wire rope of 21/64" diameter. Figure 4, 390 Figure 5. 4000-1b load secured to cable test specimen. 36 SCALE IN INCHES Figure 6. Cable used in Mohole project (top) and specimen of 3 X 31 wire rope 21/64" in diameter. 37 = dae ha Ad — - a7 GaIdISSVIONN 8} preo srqz, ([-¥1) TAN 6£S0 H8BL ‘TO £0 400 US "uM ‘UY ‘uedoT ‘O ‘f¢ ‘uosdwoyy ssa], - Sa]qeo JayeM1apun uoljzejUueunNs4suy - Ayderd0uRaDQ sjsa. - sajqep GaIdISSVIONN 8! preo s1yy, ([-¥1) TUN 6£S0 AS®L ‘TO €0 #00 US "NM ‘uy ‘uedo7 "Oo ‘f ‘uosdwoyy 8}9a], - Sajqeo JazeMiapun uoljze}UaUINI4suy - Aydeisouea0Q sjsay, - salqep *pajsa} Sajqeo 1a4j0 a4] 0} patedwioo uaym Sula] qoid o1ydeidouea0 aAI}ISUaS OJ aSN S}I IOABJ P]NOM 7eY} SONSI -19}0B1BYO BALY 0} PUNO} SEM 2IGed GI X F PUL ~Yoje1}S [eUOIze}0I1 pue d4SE]A 0} 9oUEISISAI Itay} aUTUIIa}ap 0} ‘SUOIzeIedo auIIeW IOJ asn ]¥1eue3 Ul MOU Sa[qed Uaa}INOJ UO pajoNpUOD a1eM S489} BATSUa}Xq “€96T Toquiaaon gt ‘"dgg ‘uedo] “y"y pue uosdwoyy "DO “Lf Aq ‘SNOILVUAdO OIHd VHDONVAOO HOI SATAVO ANIM GaIdIssvIONN 6611 q10day Aroyerogey soru01j9a1q AACN *pajsaj} Sa]qeo 1ay}0 94} 0} paredwioo uaym swalqoid o1ydei1d0uvac0 aAT}ISUaS IOJ 9SN S}I IOARJ P[NOM 7eY} SOT}ST -Ja}0B1 YO BABY 0} PUNO} SEM a]qud GT KX FOUL “Yo}e1}S TeUOT}E}01 pue O14SE]A 07 BOURISIYaI Itayj} aUTULIa}ap 0} ‘suOIjvtedo aulIeW 10j asn ]®1aued ul MOU SaTqud UsazA1NOJ UO payoONpuoD a1eM S389} BAISUAIX| “E961 Iaquiaaon ET ‘*dgg ‘uedoyT “yy pue uosdwoyy “OD ‘Lf Aq ‘SNOILVUAdO OIHAVUDONVANO HOU SATAVO ANIM ddgIdISSVIONN 6611 y20day Aroyeriogey sowosjoatq AAeN GaIGISSVIONN St pred styy, (-¥1) TON 6£S0 HSBL “TO £0 400 US “Mu ‘uesoT IT "O. "f ‘uosdwoyy “LT sjSaq, - Sa]qeo IajeMIapun = -¢ uoljze}Uuawnaysuy - AyderSoura0Q *Z sjsal - sajqed ‘T GUIGISSVIONN St pxreo s1yg, (I-71) TAN 6£S0 HSBL ‘TO £0 $00 YS “MY ‘uRZ0T “IT "Oo ‘f ‘uosdwoy, -“{ sjSaL - Sajqeo JayeMaapun “Eg uorjejUuaunaysuy - AydeisouraoQ = *Z sisal - sajqeQ tT *pajsa} Sa]qeo 1ayj0 ay} 0} paredwioo uayM swa]qoid o1ydeidouvac0 aAtjISuas IO} asn S}I IOARJ p]NOM 7eY} SOTST -Ja}JOBIVYD BABY 0} PUNO] SEM 91Ged GI X F AYL “Yojat}S JeuoIZe}01 pue d4SE]A 0} 9OUEISISAI Ifay} VUlWAa}ap 0} ‘SuoIzZIado auIIeW IOJ asN ]B4aua3 ur Mou Sa]qed uaazINOj UO payoNpuOD a1aM S}S9q BAISUA}IX| “€96T Taqwmaaon ET ‘“dgg “uedo7 “y"y pue uosdwoyy “9 “¢ 4q ‘SNOILVUAdO OIHd VUDONVADO YOU SATAVO AHIM aIdIssvIONA 66IT j10day Azoyerogey sowo.3joa,q AABN *paj}sa} Sayqeo 1ayj0 ay} 0} pareduioo uay Swa]qoid o1ydetSouva00 aAT}ISUaS IOJ ASN S}I IOABJ P[NOM 7eY} SO14ST -1a}OBIVYO BABY 0} PUNOJ SBM 2Iqed GT X F AYL “Yo}oI}S [eUOTzeIOA pue O14SB]a 0} BOURISISaI ITY} AUTUIIaJap 0} ‘suoTyerado oUIIeUI I0J Asn ]¥1auad ut Mou Sa]qeo UaajzAINOJ UO pajJONpUOD aaaM S}Saq JAISUA}X| “E961 Iequaron et ‘*dge ‘uesoT “y"y pue uosdwoyy “9 “fF Aq ‘SNOILVUAdO OIHd VUDONVADO HOU SATAVO ANIM ddqgIdISSVIONN 66IT Jaoday Aroyeroqey soruoajoa}q AACN INITIAL DISTRIBUTION LIST CHIEF» BUREAU OF SHIPS CODE 210L (3) CODE 240C (2) CODE 320 CODE 360 CODE 370 CHIEF» BUREAU OF NAVAL WEAPONS DLI-3 DLI-31 FASS RU-222 RUDC-2 RUDC-11 CHIEF» BUREAU OF YARDS AND DOCKS CHIEF OF NAVAL PERSONNEL PERS 118 CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS OP-07T OP-71 OP-76C OP-03EG OP-09B5 CHIEF OF NAVAL RESEARCH CODE 416 CODE 466 CODE 468 COMMANDER IN CHIEF US PACIFIC FLEET COMMANDER IN CHIEF US ATLANTIC FLEET COMMANDER OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION FORCE DEPUTY COMMANDER OPERATIONAL TEST —- EVALUATION FORCE» PACIFIC COMMANDER CRUISER-=DESTROYER FORCE» US ATLANTIC FLEET US PACIFIC FLEET COMMANDER TRAINING COMMAND US PACIFIC FLEET COMMANDER SUBMARINE DEVELOPMENT GROUP TWO US NAVAL AIR DEVELOPMENT CENTER NADC LIBRARY US NAVAL MISSILE CENTER TECHe LIBRARY» CODE NO 3022 PACIFIC MISSILE RANGE /CODE 3250/ US NAVAL ORDNANCE LABORATORY LIBRARY US NAVAL ORDNANCE TEST STATION PASADENA ANNEX LIBRARY CHINA LAKE PUGET SOUND NAVAL SHIPYARD USN RADIOLOGICAL DEFENSE LABORATORY DAVID TAYLOR MODEL BASIN APPLIED MATHEMATICS LABORATORY /LIBRARY/ HONOLULU-JOHN C MARR LA JOLLA» CALIFORNIA HONOLULU» HAWAII STANFORD» CALIFORNIA POINT LOMA STA-Je He JOHNSON DEFENSE DOCUMENTATION CENTER ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND» MARYLAND REDSTONE SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION CENTER BEACH EROSION BOARD CORPS OF ENGINEERS» US ARMY DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF» US AIR FORCE AFRST-SC STRATEGIC AIR COMMAND HQ AIR WEATHER SERVICE UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI THE MARINE LABe LIBRARY (3) COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HUDSON LABORATORIES LAMONT GEOLOGICAL OBSERVATORY DARTMOUTH COLLEGE THAYER SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING RUTGERS UNIVERSITY CORNELL UNIVERSITY OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF OCEANOGRAPHY US NAVY MINE DEFENSE LABORATORY. US NAVAL TRAINING DEVICE CENTER CODE 365H» ASW DIVISION USN UNDERWATER SOUND LABORATORY LIBRARY (3) ATLANTIC FLEET ASW TACTICAL SCHOOL USN MARINE ENGINEERING LABORATORY US NAVAL RESEARCH LABORATORY CODE 2027 US NAVAL ORDNANCE LABORATORY CORONA USN UNDERWATER SOUND REFERENCE LABe BEACH JUMPER UNIT TWO US FLEET ASW SCHOOL US FLEET SONAR SCHOOL USN UNDERWATER ORDNANCE STATION OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH PASADENA USN WEATHER RESEARCH FACILITY US NAVY OCEANOGRAPHIC OFFICE (2) US NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL LIBRARY (2) DEPTe OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH LONDON BOSTON CHICAGO SAN FRANCISCO FLEET NUMERICAL WEATHER FACILITY US NAVAL ACADEMY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE NAVY R-D ONR SCIENTIFIC LIAISON OFFICER WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION AIR DEVELOPMENT SQUADRON UNE /VX-1/ DOD RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING TECHNICAL LIBRARY. NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER (3) COMMITTEE ON UNDERSEA WARFARE US COAST GUARD OCEANOGRAPHY - METEOROLOGY BRANCH ARCTIC RESEARCH LABORATORY WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION US COAST AND GEODETIC SURVEY MARINE DATA DIVISION /ATTN-22/ (3) US WEATHER BUREAU US CIVIL ENGINEERING LABORATORY (2) US GEOLOGICAL SURVEY LIBRARY DENVER SECTION US BUREAU OF COMMERCIAL FISHERIES LA JOLLA DRe AHLSTROM WASHINGTON 255 De Ceo POINT LOMA STATION WOODS HOLE» MASSACHUSETTS UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND NARRAGANSETT MARINE LABORATORY YALE UNIVERSITY BINGHAM OCEANOGRAPHIC LABORATORY FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII A-M COLLEGE OF TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF OCEANOGRAPHY THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DEFENSE RESEARCH LABORATORY HARVARD UNIVERSITY SCRIPPS INSTITUTION OF OCEANOGRAPHY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ALLAN HANCOCK FOUNDATION UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF OCEANOGRAPHY FISHERIES-OCEANOGRAPHY LIBRARY NEW YORK UNIVERSITY DEPT OF METEOROLOGY - OCEANOGRAPHY UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DRe JOHN Ce AYERS (2) UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA GEOPHYSICAL INSTITUTE