ot ax Vials AAT Keay ete tty BTR vy , Ne SAXON EO: . : Mary eye iw snk ‘ britit RENT ep toh eakan eur nett 4 Py ° , i ean ui RUN Tae ok Uy “ Si a3 Tu sn Pelee hm ye 3) 6h “+e Gu . \ te; bas ww Uy la =| ~” Ch AG y . nn = 5 x GN Is} Wd oe MG we E Z = G Of f = =z \4 s a a = 70n pe. a ree = On, dy & = = I > j 2 ‘ 5 Ass Zz 29) Pa - LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN. INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI_ NVINOSHLINS F nk t Uj ggg, * INSTITUTION NOILALILSNI LIBRARIES LIBRARIES NOILNLILSNI NVINOSHLINS S3IYVvVus!IT LIBRARIES INS] Xs SMITHSONIAN * LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILALILSNI NVINOSHLINS SJ INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI S3IY¥YVYSIT LIBRARIES SMITHS S3aliyYvysl) at fh is S3luvudgly = ” Z “” z w“ < = < = < = Na = ma a 6 x 5 Ns = 5 - 2) wo MD ~ War wo sees wn = O = AN O Es fe} _ z E Lo Zz, S = = ) > = NY >" = > a Zz a ae Z a 2 NOILALILSNI_NVINOSHLINS SAIYVYal) LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INS’ WY) mo ~ s (sp) : > : 3 We = z = YUYfn,% < 2 VAS < : < fy fe a : = NS c a ee co en fs) 4 fe) na S =i = ad 5 “LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI NVINOSHLINS $3 S = aM z id cas z a = oer S S (aes 2) i a a Pe) ~ > = > I ¥ = a - 7 ; = a 7 i = Z ss z D z : a » NOILALILSNI NVINOSHLINS S3IYVYEIT LIBRARIES. SMITHSONIAN INS ide) = w < wre ” Qs = = ‘ Ss = & & = < = Zz 4 ZZ WN F z a a n a RE a SD fe) z om = ‘SN fe) = zZ aa Zz an NS = pas aon S : > = rr = 7) » 2 = LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI NVINOSHLINS $3 a= — Ww — ” = Ze) im Lu = uu z ; us n 2M” ee Ww Ss SN pe pa oO . Use oc es AS cc = < 3 c a a ‘NY < = Bs 4 a = Se = mee 2 a 2 We 5 2 5 . s = Se E 2 E pe AK NN Ol 2 E. 4 2 Xu im SS 2 m Z m == on a be = w = wn ] aie B RAR] ES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION _ NVINGSHLIMIS 3 ae = ae z < = = a. zZ A a z a XS / = SAE)? SOE AS ESL "a 2 E WN 2 EB z = > = NY =: = Bid tty, = Gar)? Gye = WK, 3 he 977 SX “Yip = “Gar 2 Gp = aN 2 ayy = ; pp Ui = IN. DC. > f = . > ENS = if be w A * LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI NVINOSHLIWS Sa14ut =e t Js se aS rt ANS a: gk) a 5 WX. = oc Wp : ha oc = XS Y facd faa) ip —_ jaa) oo “ fon] ae “a ei _ e) a | ; pa a wd am RM aa VOILNLILSNI _NWINOSHLIWS ~°4 1yYVuad wh LIBRAR! ES_ SMITHSONIAN _INSTIT a [J ro) ae: oO A pee b oO S ah ie] — ty. “Sp oO a) Nw = D 5 Gy, 2D sat s& NK I z fe Y4jp y ais - = = AN & 2 = 47 £7 2 m SS ob m ey m IBRARIES = SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOLOLIESNI NVINOSHIINS “Sate ~ a + w = < = oN = AY = = @; z & \y 3 py, 2 2 g 7) ”n ~ BAK @ JEL: 7) w Uy Yue’ = NN DANS Oo Ge Ul: on oO 4 z E AS ee re ee SS 2 = \ Pa = > Tra 2 a) Ne ae ” Fr YOILNLILSNI NVINOSHLINS SSIYVYUSIT LIBRARIES INSTITI ae z 4 2 wn oxi ” mas 77) am ied = ow 2 = seas 4 x ; c ne S ae a = a) = re 4 fo) i e) ae e) | ras aoe me AA as IBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI NYINOSHLINS S314 re | a = r a, rd Sy’? (Rt R= HS | a | a “a a) a a Ey Ps va ms —— = = = rie ” in w” m ap) S 7) = ” woe S3SIYVYAIT LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTIT = ” ee “es n = Re = = Uy eS < KX Zz a en S SS — = fo) = ie co NG CO = SG Ws ? g ZR 8 2 NX Fs 2) En aay = = > & robe = ‘ n = ” an ee 79) -I'BRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILALILSNI NWINOSHIUNS. Si4 1uy WW Lu R Lu = yy Jp = = 4 OS Gi = : 2K = a Gy 0: = KO ac a aa z S| le - i Zz pee | ae x a YOILNLILSNI NVINOSHLINS S3!1YVYHNSEIT LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN _INSTIT ir 8 z ie z » ie = 2 ay = w a = 2 2 > = > = pice zs 5 : bY : oe z ag: z o INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNt NVINOSHLINS S3I1UY 2 a. 2 z = yf zs = a 4p, z = 4 ae oO 33 Ge TS) eR Uy 3 = Ie 7 ae 3, al ee ma . fl 24 co = 4 7 z ie 2, < = =. = = = Caan ie oe Vow ay : | yy r ay FY tas ony “~ » F&F — +) 2 } OA O}) ee Was e \ \ CG. Nat cae 4 a > Ue 4 eS* ca 1 wr _, Fis p! Dive ~ a a | ~ Commonwealth oi Australia. DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND CUSTOMS. Zoological Results of the Fishing Experiments carried out by F.I.S. “Endeavour” 1909-10 under H. C. DANNEVIG, Commonwealth Director of Fisheries. VOLUME Tf. PUBLISHED BY DIRECTION OF THE MINISTERS FOR TRADE AND Customs, Hon. FRANK GWYNNE TUDOR AND Hon. LITTLETON E. GROOM. SYDNEY, 1911-1914. CONTENTS. PART I,—PusuiisHep 22ND Decemsper, 1911. Page Plates Report on the Fishes obtained by the F.I.S. «« Endeay- our’’ on the Coasts of New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia, and Tasmania. Partl. By Allan R. McCulloch : a REE SNe Vale Report on the Mollusca obtained by the F. I. S. ««En- deavour’’ chiefly off Cape Wiles, South Australia. Part 1. By Charles Hedley ... ae Be ee 90 XVII.- XX. PART I[.—Pousuisuep 97TH Juty, 1912. Report on the Sponges obtained by the F.I. 8. ‘‘ En- deavour’’ on the Coasts of New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia, Queensland, and 'T'as- mania. Partl. By. E. F. Hallmann .... coe luli7, XeXeT= XXXVI. PART III.—PusuisHep 297TH Aucust, 1912. A new Species of Asymmetron from the Great Austra- lian Bight, South Australia. By Janet W. Raff... 304 XXXVII. Report on a sample of Globigerina Ooze from 1122 fathoms, East of Tasmania. By F.Chapman ... 309 PART IV.—PusuisHEep 4rH JuLy, 1914. Title Page, Contents, and Index: LIST OF THE CONTRIBUTORS. With References and Catalogue Numbers. Chapman, F.— 59.512 (26.5: 94.6). Report on a Sample of Globigerina Ooze from 1122 fathoms, East of Tasmania. Zool. Res. End., i., 3, 1912. Hallmann, E. F.— 59.54 (26.5: 94.2-5). Report on the Sponges obtained by the F. I. S. ‘‘ Endeavour’’ on the Coasts of New South Wales, South Australa, Queensland, and Tasmania. Part 1. Zool. Res. End. 1., 2, 1912, Hedley, Charles— 59.4 (26.5: 94.2). Report on the Mollusca obtained by the F. I. S. ‘‘Endeavour”’ chiefly off Cape Wiles, South Australia. Part 1. Zool. Res. End. %., 1, 1911. McCulloch, Allan R.— 59.7 (26.5: 94.2-6), Report on the Fishes obtained by the F. I. S. “ Endeavour’’ on the Coasts of New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia, and Tasmania. Part 1. Zool. Res. End., 1., 1, 1911, Raff, Janet W.— 59.71 (26.5: 94.2). A New Species of Asymmetron from the Great Australian Bight. Zool. Res. End., 1t., 3, 1912. L9If. Commonwealth of Australia. Department of Trade and Customs. YORE RIES. Zoological Results of the Fishing Experiments carried out by the F.1.S. ‘‘ Endeavour,’’ 1909-10 (H. C. Dannevig, Commonwealth Director of Fisheries). 663 PUBLISHED BY DIRECTION OF THE HONORABLE FRANK GWYNNE TUDOR, MINISTER FOR TRADE AND CUSTOMS, Sydney, December 22nd, 1911. a EDWARD LEE & OO., Print., 14 Oarrington Street, Syduey hy Ht INTRODUCTORY NOTE. The Reports comprised in the ‘‘Zoological Results of the Fishing Experiments carried out by the F.I.S. ‘Endeavour’ ’’ have been prepared at the Australian Museum, Sydney, under the authority of the Trustees, and at the request of the Hon. The Minister for Trade and Customs. The material for investigation is sent direct from the ‘‘Endeavour’’ by the Director of Fisheries (Mr. H. C. Dan- nevig) to the Australian Museum, and, after elaboration, is ’ distributed as follows :—-All ‘“‘types”’ are held in reserve for the Fisheries Branch of the Department of Trade and Customs; a set of ‘‘co-types’’ are retained by the Trustees; the remainder of the specimens are distributed to the other Aus- tralasian State Museums in the name of the Minister for Trade and Customs. The Reports deal with the Fishes collected on the coasts of New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia and Tas- mania. The Asteroidea and Sponges are from the same waters with the addition of those of the Queensland coast. The Mollusca are a more specialised series, chiefly obtained off Cape Wiles, South Australia. The new Asymmetron comes from the Great Australian Bight, and a sample of Globigerina Ooze was obtained to the east of Tasmania. ; ear ’ } , , hy a aigl “ i ‘ y vane! ry] Nia mn ; f fitz we ! pe iia Ne? wn ge ; ie iy 1 oh & ; VR u } ed) vi i A ryan | i i . hy i j { } i) : | a Vif : : ag fl vi at ) | i i / s j i i i : . ie (iu \ : | ? i Hi Y { é : j ie h i j i 1 i u t A | j ti h f : ; . ‘ ‘ er Hi a i i ; Tee ul } Wit nias 7 rGhg v, : ; t n | s ‘gy ' ay ; : Le ah i] LT a ! q i i i vi . p i eG , 7 ” i J vee i i } inl yeu j i tod Wyld Ci ; my | bts i ; eet , 7 1 : pl P| { 1) , ae ¥ ha = * tly ! A f, Y am OY heat ae in ‘abi ak ve " i cae ie , te a ue ny On F aan ne 7 al \! ie et . Report on the Fishes obtained by the F.I.S. ‘* Endeavour,’ on the Coasts of New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia and Tasmania. PART L BY ALLAN R. McCULLOCH, Zoo.ocist, Australian Museum Sydney. Plates I-xviI.; Text figs. 1-20. a i , \ “at — = i ; k . ' j ' i ' % a] { ¢ - ; i) : , ; ' a) j 4 a) a ; \ y | ; U ie ‘i 4 ? ; f er ve aN Pero pe ie ny avtiiiue'y Shas) fe i is iy +> a eae i = oe wih Ve ied 1: a I.—REPORT ON THE FISHES. PART we I.—INTRODUCTION. The collections dealt with in this Report were obtained’ by the Federal Fisheries Investigation Ship ‘‘Endeavour,’’ under the direction of Mr. H. C. Dannevig. They were obtained at many localities along the New South Wales, Victorian, Tasmanian and South Australian coasts at various. depths down to ninety fathoms. ‘The present part deals with the greater number of the fishes forwarded for examination to: the Australian Museum from this area, but the Scleroparei and Jugulares of the Acanthopterygii and the Pediculati and Plectognathi are reserved for a second part. In all about 1070 specimens, representing 94 species, have been critically examined, which, in conjunction with the large collections in the Australian Museum, have afforded excellent material for a detailed study of variation in many hitherto little known species. With a series of forty or fifty specimens from wide-spread localities before one, it is often a simple matter to. recognise the identity of fishes which have been regarded as. distinct when isolated examples afford no clue. In the follow- ing pages I have endeavoured to clear up the synonymy of species of Ceelorhynchus, Physiculus, Seriolella, Callanthias, Cesioperca, etc., while figures are given showing the remark- able variation of Zanclistius, Macrorhamphosus, Centriscops, Beryx and others. Many of the more striking variations were specially selected by Mr. Dannevig on board the ship, and it is largely due to his discrimination in this direction that so many extreme forms are here dealt with. When individuals. were lacking to complete a series he has gone to considerable trouble to obtain them, and in the case of fishes in which the colours were of importance, he has sent me fresh material packed in ice. For this and other valuable help I owe him my best thanks. I have also to acknowledge the kindness of the Com- mittee of the Macleay Museum who have allowed me to borrow some of Sir William Macleay’s type specimens for examination and comparison with the ‘‘Endeavour’’ collec- tions. Ten species are described as new, and four others and two: genera are recorded from Australia for the first time. Thirty- three are figured, and I have to acknowledge the very willing assistance of Mr. Dene Fry, of the Australian Museum, 1m the preparation of the plates. 2 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. II.—DESCRIPTION OF THE GENERA AND SPECIES. Famiry HEXANCHID-. GENUS HEPTRANCHIAS, Rafinesque. HEPTRANCHIAS PERLO, Bonnaterre. Seven-gilled Shark. (Plate 1.,$ieeer.) Squalus perlo, Bonnaterre, Encycl. Meth., Ichth., 1788, p. 10. Squalus cinereus, Gmelin, Linn. Syst. Nat., 1789, p. 1497. Heptanchus cinereus, Muller & Henle, Plagiost., 1839, p. 81, pl. xxv. Notidanus cinereus, Giinther, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., viii., 1870, p. 398. The collection includes seven examples which I am unable to separate from the European H. perlo, Bonnaterre. ‘Their teeth agree exactly with Muller and Henle’s figure, and they also fit the description fairly well. I forwarded a photograph of one of the specimens, together with some notes, to Mr. C. ‘Tate Regan for his opinion, and he has favoured me with the following reply :—‘‘So far as I can judge from your photo- graph the shark is H. cinereus.” These specimens are readily distinguished from H. indicus, Agassiz, the only other Australian species, by the following characters :-— Head broad, snout broadly rounded; a single median tooth in the upper jaw; colour greyish with darker spots :—indicus. Head narrow, snout pointed; no single median tooth in the upper jaw; colour uniform grey :— perlo. All the specimens were taken in the one haul in 60-70 fathoms, sixty miles south of Cape Everard, Victoria. Famiry HETERODONTIDA®. Genus HetTEROpONTUS, Blainville. HETERODONTUS PHILIPPI, Bloch and Schneider. Port Jackson Shark, Bullhead Shark, Oyster Crusher. Squalus philippi, Bloch and Schneider, Syst. Ichth., 1801, p:' 134 Cestracion phillipi, Regan, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (S) ode 1908, Pp. 495. FISHES.—MCCULLOCH. 3 Specimens of this common species were preserved from the following localities :-— Between Newcastle and Port Stephens, New South Wales, 22-60 fathoms. Shoalhaven Bight, New South Wales, 15-45 fathoms. Off the mouth of the Murray River, South Australia, 20 fathoms. Fifty miles south of Cape Wiles, South Australia, 75 fathoms. Spencer Gulf, South Australia, 70 fathoms. GENUS GYROPLEURODUS, Gill. GYROPLEURODUS GALEATUS, Giinther. Crested Port Jackson Shark. Cestracion galeatus, Ginther, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., viii., 1870, p. 416. Gyropleurodus galeatus, Regan, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (8), 1., 1908, Pp. 495- Two specimens from 43 fathoms, six miles off Port Stephens, New South Wales. Famiry SCYLIORHINIDE. GENUS SCYLIORHINUS, Blainville. SCYLIORHINUS ANALIS, Ogilby. Spotted Dog-fish, Spotted Cat-shark. Scyllium anale, Ogilby, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, x., 1885, p. 445. Scyliorhinus analis, Regan, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (8), 1., 1908, pp. 455 and 460. Scyllium maculatum, Ramsay, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, v., 1880, p. 97; id., Johnston, Proc. Roy. Soc. Tasm., 1882 (1883), p. 138 (nec. S. maculatum, Bl. Schn.). The collection includes two males, one from Shoalhaven Bight, New South Wales, 15-45 fathoms, and the other from -off Babel Island, Bass Strait. Ogilby! has suggested that the specimen doubtfully recorded from Tasmania by R. M. John- ston as Scyllium maculatum is really this species, and this view is confirmed by the second ‘‘Endeavour’’ specimen. The size of the anal fin is variable in different specimens of this species and therefore cannot be relied upon as has been done by Regan in his key to the species of Scyliorhinus. 1 Ogilby—Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales (2), iv., 1889, p. 180. 4 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. SCYLIORHINUS VINCENTI, Zietz. (Plate u-; fig. 3 aman. 1.) Scyllium vincenti, Zietz, Trans. Roy. Soc. South Australia, XXXII., 1908, p.287- Through the kindness of Professor E. C. Stirling, Director of the South Australian Museum, I have been able to compare one of Mr. Zietz’s specimens with another taken by the ‘‘En- deavour’’ in 20 fathoms off the mouth of the Murray River, South Australia. They differ slightly in the relative positions. of the fins which, however, I find to be equally variable in allied species. According to Zietz, the origin of the first dorsal is behind the middle of the total length. In both I have examined it is a little nearer the tip of the snout than the extremity of the tail. In the ‘‘Endeavour’’ specimen the base of the anal is shorter than that of the co-type and terminates below the- anterior portion of the second dorsal instead of nearer the- middle of that fin. The end of the bases of the ventrals is in advance of the origin of the dorsal, not below it, as described by Zietz, though in his specimen the flesh is shrunken around the base of the dorsal, making it appear farther forward than it really is. Finally, the colour in the better preserved example is a dark chocolate brown above, with numerous creamy-white spots all over the body and fins, except on the front half of the head. The dark cross-bands are ill-defined, and there appears to be a series of darker blotches on the sides. The belly is creamy-white in colour. The following is a description of the ‘‘Endeavour’’ speci- men :—Head to last gill-opening 5.3 in the length, its width 1.5 in its length; eye 6.5 in the head and about equal to halt the length of the snout which is 3.1 in the head. The inter- orbital space is greater than the length of the snout. Preoral portion of the head 1.5 in the width of the mouth which ts 2.4 in the head and greater than the snout. Body elongate, slightly compressed. Head depressed, flat above; snout rounded, blunt in profile, its width before the eyes one-third greater than its length. Eves lateral, with the inferior fold well marked. Spiracle large, oval, and placed just behind the eye. Gill-slits decreasing in size back- wards, the last being about half as wide as the first and placed over the base of the pectoral. Nasal valves produced as lobes directed outwards and backwards, with emarginate posterior borders; they are separated from each other and from the mouth, the space between them being rather more than the FISHES.—MCCULLOCH. 5 width of one lobe. No cirrus. A well-marked labial fold extends round the angle of the mouth, its anterior limb rather shorter than its posterior which extends less than half way towards the middle of the lower jaw. Teeth similar in both jaws, arranged in several rows, tricuspid, with the median point longer than the lateral ones. First dorsal originating a little behind the posterior base of the ventrals and slightly in advance of the middle of the total length. The length of its base is much greater than its height ; its anterior margin is very oblique, and the posterior nearly vertical, and the lower angle is pointed. The second dorsal is a trifle higher than the first, and is of similar form, though the posterior angle 1s slightly produced; its origin is over the posterior portion of the anal, and the hinder angle is midway between the posterior insertion of the first dorsal and the tip of the caudal. The anal is considerably larger than either of the dorsals, and its base is longer than its dis- tance from the caudal; the posterior angle acute. Greatest breadth of the caudal a little less than one-third of its length. Posterior angles of the ventrals acute and the margins united in the male. Scales quadrilateral and keeled on the head, becoming tri- angular and acutely pointed dorsally and tricuspid on the sides. Colour.—Chocolate brown above, with ill-defined darker cross-bars. ‘There are indications of some dark blotches on the sides, and the hinder half of the head, body, tail and fins bear many creamy-white spots which tend to form rings. Total length of adult male 414 mm. 6 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. The following key will serve to distinguish the four species of Scyliorhinus hitherto recorded from Australia :— a. Nasal valves separated from each other and from the mouth. b. Labial fold extending along the lower jaw half or less than half the distance to the symphysis. c. Body lighter with brown spots and sometimes cross- bands. Ventral fins of males not directly in con- tact behind the claspers but with an intermediate integument :— analis.. cc. Body darker, with white spots and obscure cross- bands. Ventral fins of males in contact behind the claspers :-— vincentt. bb. Labial fold extending along the lower jaw nearly to the symphysis. d. Body with scattered darker spots:— maculatum- aa. Nasal valves overlapping the edge of the upper lip. e. Body with darker spots, sometimes confluent into cross bands or ocelli :— marmoratus- GENUS CEPHALOSCYLLIUM, Gull. CEPHALOSCYLLIUM ISABELLA, Bonnaterre. Swell Shark, Carpet Shark. L’ Isabelle, Broussonet, Mem. Acad. Sci. Paris, 1780, p. 648 (non binomial). Squalus isabella, Bonnaterre, Encycl. Meth., Ichth., 1788, p-. 6. Squalus (i)sabella, Gmelin, Linn. Syst. Nat., 1789, p. 1489, Scyllium laticeps, Dumeril, Rev. et Mag. Zool., 1853, p. 84, ply tits, ig. 2. Cephaloscyllium laticeps, Waite, Rec. Cantb. Mus., i., No. 2, 1909; (p-6:, pl..xiv., fig gaeend pl ax, fg. 1 Cephaloscyllium sabella, Waite, Trans. N. Zeal. Inst., xli., IglO, p. 384. A small example is in the collection which was trawled off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait. FISHES.—MCCULLOCH. FamMiILty ORECTOLOBIDA:. ~ GENUS PARASCYLLIUM, Gill. PARASCYLLIUM VARIOLATUM, Dumeril. (Plate ii., fig. 1.) Hemiscyllium variolatum, Dumeril, Rev. et. Mag. Zool., 1053, p- '25,. pl-iim., fig. 1 Parascyllium variolatum, Ogilby and McCulloch, Proc. Roy- Soc. N.S.Wales, -xlii., 1908, p, 269. Two fine female examples were taken off Port Phillip Heads in November, 1909. PARASCYLLIUM COLLARE, Kamsay and Ogilby. Collared Cat Shark. Parascyllium collare, Ramsay and. Ogilby, Proc. Linn. Soc. NESa Wales) (2). i. 188emape. taro; id., ‘Ogilby and McCulloch, Proc. Roy. Soc. N.S. Wales, xlii., 1908, p-. 267. Three males from Shoalhaven Bight, New South Wales, 15-45 fathoms. PARASCYLLIUM FERRUGINEUM, Sp. nov. (Plate u., fig. 2, and fig. 2.) Head to last gill-opening, 5.8 in the length, its width 1% in its length. Eye g in the head, 2.8 in the snout which is 3.2 in the head. Interorbital space almost equal to the snout. Preoral portion of head equal to half the width of the mouth which is 1.3 in the snout. Body elongate, somewhat depressed anteriorly, cylindrical posteriorly. Head much depressed with its upper surface flat; snout broadly rounded, obtusely conical in profile and increasing in width backwards. Eyes lateral with a prominent fold below. Spiracle minute and situated half an eye-diameter from the infero-posterior angle of the eye. Gill-openingss in- creasing regularly in size from the first to the fourth, the last very large, 32 the width of the first and more than half as long as the snout; the last two are placed over the base of the pectoral. Nasal cirrus short and thick, just reaching to the lips; exterior nasal fold with two or three small lobes posteriorly, the outer the longest and pointed. Lower labial fold extending about half way towards the middle of the jaw and continued round the angle of the mouth. Teeth similar in Ss “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. both jaws, small, flattened, triangular and acute, with rounded projections on each side basally but not tricuspid. First dorsal fin originating well behind the ventrals, but a little nearer the tip of the snout than the end of the tail; its posterior margin nearly vertical and forming a right angle with the lower margin. Second dorsal subequal to the first and of similar form, its hinder angle about midway between the posterior insertion of the first and the tip of the caudal. Anal fin low with its outer border oblique and terminating below the anterior part of the second dorsal; the length of its base about 14 in its distance from the caudal. Greatest breadth of the caudal a little less than one-fourth its length. Pectorals longer than broad, with the angles rounded. Ven- trals quadrilateral, 12 as long as broad. Colour.—Greyish brown above with indistinct darker cross- bands; the first narrow and extending between the eyes, the next broader and covering the space between the gill-openings. There are two more before the first dorsal and one in front of the second dorsal. Entire body with evenly spaced large brown spots which are darkest on the cross-bars and become elongate on the caudal. Three similar spots on each side of the nuchal band. Fins also with spots which are most numerous on the dorsal. Type.—A female, 730 mm. long, taken outside Port Phillip Heads, Victoria, in November, 1909. Of the two described species of Parascyllium this is nearest allied to P. collare, Rams. and Ogil., but it may be at once distinguished by its much broader head, more rounded snout, larger fins and different colouration. FISHES.—McCULLOCH. 9 Famity CARCHARIID. GENUS GALEUS, Rafinesque. GALEUS AUSTRALIS, Macleay. School Shark. Galeus australis, Macleay, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, vi. 1881, p: 354. Six small examples, each about 110 mm. long, were obtained in Oyster Bay, Tasmania. y GENUS) PRIONACE, Cantor. PRIONACE GLAUCA, Linneus. Blue Shark. Squalus glaucus, Linneus, Syst. Nat., roth ed., 1758, p. 235. A number of specimens of this widely distributed species were caught with hand-lines off the South Australian coast. Famiry SPHYRNID. GENUS SPHYRNA, Rafinesque. SPHYRNA LEWINI, Lord. Hammer-headed Shark. Zygena lewini, Lord in Griffith, Anim. Kingd., x., 1834, p- 640. One small male from the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait. Famity SQUALID. GENUS SQUALUS, Linneus. SQUALUS MEGALOPS, Macleay. Dog-fish. Acanthias megalops, Macleay, Prec. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, Vi-g LOOT, P= 307. Numerous examples of this species were preserved from off Babel and Flinders Islands, Bass Strait. Famity PRISTIOPHORIDE. GENUS PRISTIOPHORUS, Miller and Henle. PRISTIOPHORUS CIRRATUS, Latham. Saw Shark. Pristts cirratus, Latham, Trans. Linn. Soc., ii1., 1794, p. 281, pl. xxvi., fig. 5, and pl. xxvii. Numerous foetal specimens and several young of this species are in the collection from Shoalhaven Bight, New South Wales, 15-45 fathoms, and north of Goose Island, Bass Strait. Io “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. PRISTIOPHORUS NUDIPINNIS, Giinther. Saw Shark. (Plate i., fig. 2.) Pristiophorus nudipinnis, Gunther, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., vill., 1870, p. 432; id.,. McCoy, Prodr. Zool. Vict., 1881, pl. Ivi., fig. 2; id., Regan, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (8), i1., LQO8;.P- 57: The collection includes several foetal and young specimens. from off the mouth of the Murray River, South Australia, 20: fathoms, and from Flinders Island, Investigator Group, South Australia, 37 fathoms. Plate 1., fig. 2, represents a young example, 445 mm. long,. from the latter locality. Famity SQUATINIDE. GENUS SQUATINA, Dumeril. SQUATINA SQUATINA, Linneus. Angel Shark. Squalus squatina, Linneus, Syst. Nat., 10 ed., 1758, p. 233- Rhina squatina, McCoy, Prodr. Zool. Vict., Dec. iv., 1879,. pl. xxxiv. Young and foetal examples were preserved from the follow- ing localities :— Shoalhaven Bight, New South Wales, 15-45 fathoms. North-west of Greenly Island, South Australia, 44 fathoms. Forty-two miles south of St. Francis Island, South Aus- tralia, 35 fathoms. Famity RAJIDAE. GENuS Raja, Linneus. RAJA AUSTRALIS, Macleay. Skate. Raia australis, Macleay, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, viii., 1884, p. 461. Raja australis, Waite, Mem. Austr. Mus., iv., 1899, p. 40, pl. iv. Two large males were preserved from the Shoalhaven Bight, N.S. Wales, 15-45 fathoms. Raja NITIDA, Giinther. (Fig. 3.) Raja ntida, Gunther, ‘‘Challenger’’ Rept., Zool. i., 1880, pe 27,eply xiv.., fig. a. This species has hitherto been known only from a small male, five inches wide, from off Twofold Bay, New South Wales, 120 fathoms. The ‘‘Endeavour’’ collection includes. FISHES.—McCCULLOCH. 1 three females and one male from seven and a half to eight inches wide, which present considerable differences from Giinther’s figure, but, in view of their larger size and the fact that they come from deep water, 90 fathoms, only one to two hundred miles from Twofold Bay, I have no hesitation in identifying them with this species. The most striking difference lies in the teeth which are described as ‘‘with very small points, almost obtuse.’’ This description fits those of my female specimens which are almost pavement-like with blunt points, but in the male they are long and acute. The development of spines on the head and body, pectorals and tail, is much: greater in the larger specimens, though less in the female than the male. None of my specimens have quite the same outward form as the young one figured, but this is variable in the different speci- mens and does not afford a specific character. Finally, the dark blotches shown in the figure are wanting in my four, though the clusters of white spots are similarly distributed. The following description is drawn up from the four “‘En- deavour’’ specimens :— Snout to anterior nostrils 3.3 in the head to the last gill-slit. Interorbital space less than two-thirds of the eye, which is 4.7 in the head. Width of the mouth about 3.5 in the head. Disk very broad, its width greater than the length from the tip of the snout to its hinder margin; its anterior margin more or less undulated, the border of the pectoral either forming an unbroken line or distinct angle with the sides of the head; hinder margin rounded and somewhat angular posteriorly. Snout with a small median papilla. The distance between the outer borders of the eyes is greater than that between the latter and the edge of the disk. Preoral length of the head equal to the width between the outer edges of the spiracles. Nasal lobes produced backwards and outwards, the space between them less than half the preoral length. Inner margin of the nostrils with two interior and one exterior lobe when folded, all of which form a broad-mouthed tube when ex- panded. Gill-slits decreasing in size backwards, much smaller than the spiracle which is about half the length of the eye. Teeth small, with expanded though not confluent bases in the male, and long median points directed backwards. In the female they are rounded, flattened and juxtaposed, the median point being reduced to a small prominence only. Entire upper surface covered with minute prickles directed backwards. ‘here are two large curved spines before each eye and three or four behind them. One to three are present on the mid-line behind the head, which may be surrounded by 12 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. several smaller ones also. Behind these are several irregular rows of thorns which range themselves in one median row and two lateral ones on the tail and extend to the first dorsal fin. — re we ~ oe ee - ~— FIG. 3. Sides of the pectoral without larger thorns in the female, but these are well developed in the male, the innermost ones being the largest. Entire lower surface perfectly smooth. Dorsal fins subequal, the space between them half or less than half the length of their bases. In some the interval between the second dorsal and the caudal is equal to that between the two dorsals, in others the two fins are almost united. A skinny flap, which is widest posteriorly, extends varying distances along the sides of the tail, sometimes reach- ing as far as the ventrals. Colour.—Light brown above with very indistinct darker marblings. Clusters of white spots are scattered over the body, the most prominent of which is on the mid-line behind the head, two pairs on each side of it, and one near the middle of each pectoral fin. Total length 350 mm. Trawled in go fathoms, east of East Sister Island, Bass Strait, and elsewhere-off the Victorian Coast. RAJA WAITH, sp. nov. (Plate iii., and fig. 4.) Space between the nostrils equal to their distance from the tip of the snout. Greatest width of the mouth 2.5 in the head to the last gill-slit. Interorbital width 5 in the same, and a little greater than the length of the eve. FISHES.—McCULLOCH. I ios) Disk broad and rounded, its length 1.1 in its breadth. Snout broadly rounded, with a median rounded papilla, and confluent with the anterior margins of the pectorals which are almost straight. The lateral margins of the pectorals are rounded, as is the angle between them and the posterior border. The distance between the outer margins of the eyes is greater than that of the latter from the edge of the disk. Preoral length much less than the distance between the outer margins of the spiracles and 2.7 in the head to the last gill- opening. Width of the spiracles one-third the preoral length. a Me / Lee FIG. 4. Nasal lobes produced backwards and outwards, the exterior margins truncate, the posterior sinuate; the distance between them near the mouth about two-thirds of that between the nostrils. Nostrils with a raised tubular margin which forms a lobe posteriorly. Gill-slits decreasing in size backwards, the ig “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. first rather more than half the width of the spiracle. ‘Teeth small and rounded, scarcely juxtaposed, each with a small median point. Upper surface of disk quite smooth except for two pairs of spines above the anterior part of the eyes and four over the posterior portions. Several minute spines are also present on the upper eye-lid. “Tail with several rows of spines which are largest anteriorly but most numerous posteriorly. Both dorsal fins are also covered with minute spines. Dorsal fins subequal, the space between them equal to half the length of their bases. Caudal absent. A broad skinny flap extends along each side of the tail as far as the end of the ventrals. Anterior lobes of the ventrals greatly produced, the gaps between them and the posterior lobes each with four small triangular lobes. On the upper surface, where the fins are covered by the disk, there is a pair of large fatty glands. Colour.—Pale brown above with lighter patches which are covered with small brown dots. Body, fins and tail with numerous small bluish spots which are absent only on the lighter patches on the disk; in places they are confluent and form reticulate patterns. Lower surfaces slate-coloured. Length of specimen 454 mm. A single female specimen was trawled in 44 fathoms, north- west of Greenly Island, South Australia. This species is at once distinguished from all other Aus- tralian species of Raja by its rounded and perfectly smooth body. Famity NARCOBATIDA. Genus NaRCINE, Henle. NARCINE TASMANIENSIS, Richardson. Tasmanian Numb-fish. Narcine tasmaniensis, Richardson, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1841, p. 22, and Prans. Zool. Soe., iti:, 1849, p. 178, plo xr, fig. 2. Specimens were preserved from the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait. FamILy DASYBATID. Genus UrovLopuus, Miiller and Henle. UroLopuus cruciatus, Lacépede. Banded Stingaree. Raja cruciatus, Lacépéde, Ann. Mus., iv., 1804, pp. 201 and 210; plolv.,. fig. 2. Urolophus cruciatus, Richardson, Zool. Erebus and Terror, Fishes, 1844, p. 35, pl. xxiv. Two specimens from 40 fathoms off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait. FISHES..__MCCULLOCH. 15 Famity AETOBATIDE. Genus AEtTosBATuS, Blainville. AETOBATUS AUSTRALIS, Macleay. Eagle Ray. Myliobatis aquila, Giinther, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., viii., 1870, p. 489; id., Castelnau, Proc. Zool. Soc. Vict., i., 1872, p. 225 (nec Raja aquila, Linn.). Myliobatis nieuhofii, Castelnau, Proc. Zool. Soc. Vict., 1, 1872, p. 226, and i1., 1873, p. 58 (nec Raja nieuhofi, BI. Schn.). Myliobatis australis, Macleay, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, Vi., 1881, p. 380; td., McCoy, Prodr. Zool. Vict., pl. Ixiu., 1882. A young specimen is preserved from the Shoalhaven Bight, New South Wales, 15-45 fathoms. Gunther identified some very young Myliobatis from Sydney with M. aquila, Linneus, though he noted certain characters in their teeth which did not agree with those of that species. Castelnau (1873) suggested that this identification was in- correct and considered that they were probably the young of M. nieuhofi, Bl. Schn. Waite regarded them as M. australis, Macleay, as is evident from the fact that he omitted aquila from his list of the fishes of New South Wales.! In another paper? he expressed the opinion that M. nieuhofi and M. aus- tralis were identical, but it would seem that they differ in the forms of their snouts, it being somewhat produced in the former, and blunt and short in the latter. McCoy showed that M. australis occurred in Port Phillip, and under the circumstances I have little doubt that Castel- nau’s specimens were really that species and not M. nieuwhofi. I therefore arrange the synonymy as above. Famity CHIMAERID. GENUS CHIMERA, Linne@us. CHIMRA OGILBYI, Waite. Ghost Shark. Chimera ogilbyi, Waite, Mem. Austr. Mus., iv., pt. 1., 1899, p. 48, pl. vi. ; id., Shigeho Tanaka, Journ. Coll. Sci. Imp. Univ. Tokio, xxii., Art. 7, p. 10. 1 Waite—Mem. N.S. Wales Nat. Club., ii., 1904. 2 Waite—Mem. Austr. Mus., iv., 1899, p. 47. 16 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. Two males are in the collection which were trawled in 40 fathoms off the East Coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait. Waite’s specimens were all females, but the males have been well described by Shigeho Tanaka from Japan. Famity CALLORHYNCHID. GENUS CALLORHYNCHUS, Cuvier. CALLORHYNCHUS CALLORYNCHUS, Linnaeus. Elephant-fish. Callorhynchus callorynchus, Waite, Rec. Cantb. Mus., 1., No. 2, 1909, p- 23, pl. xwiewaip? 2. A small specimen is preserved taken off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait, and six others from the Victorian Coast: Famity CLUPEIDA. GENUS CLUPEA, Linn@us. CLuPEA (POMOLOBUS) BASSENSIS, sp. nov. Australian Sprat. (Plate iv:, fig. 2.) Clupea sprattus, Giinther, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 672 (nec C. sprattus, Linneeus). Diers;; A. 18-20; P. 17; Vigee@ero Scales 44)” 12? Body elongate, its greatest breadth less than half its height, which is 4.4 to 4.8 in the length from the snout to the hypural. Belly somewhat rounded, the scutes small, twenty-one between the head and the ventrals, and eleven more to the vent. Scales large, cycloid, commencing above the preopercle and extending onto the base of the tail. Head 3.5 to 4 in the length, and either very little or con- siderably longer than the body is deep. Eye 3.1 to 3.6 in the head, with a narrow adipose lid before and behind. Inter- orbital space flat, equal to about two-thirds of the eye. Maxillary very large, its greatest width one-third its length, reaching to below the anterior third or almost to the middle of the eye; supplemental bone very large. Upper posterior border of the operculum emarginate; hindermost portion formed of a skinny flap. Cheeks and upper portion of oper- culum covered with translucent flesh, the rest of the head naked. Lower margin of the maxillary microscopically denticulate. A few microscopic teeth are placed at widely- spaced intervals on the anterior part of the jaws.! Origin of the dorsal well in advance of the middle of the total length and just behind the vertical of the ventral fins; 1 Gunther stated that he found palatine teeth in his specimens “as well developed as in Cl. sprattus.’’ I have failed to find any in either species, but this character is generally admitted to be inconstant. FISHES.—McCULLOCH. 17; the length of its base is just about equal to the distance from the tip of the snout to the hinder margin of the eye and longer than the anterior rays. Anal low, its length much greater than that of the dorsal. Ventrals as long as half their distance from the vent. Colour.—Silvery, the upper third of the body dark blue. Scattered darker specks are found on the jaws and preorbitals and on the caudal peduncle. Rays of the dorsal, caudal and pectoral fins also dark spotted. Length of largest specimen 117 mm. Described from two specimens from off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait. Others are from the entrance to Storm Bay, Tas- mania. It is only after a detailed comparison of these specimens with many others of C. sprattus from the London markets that I venture to regard them as distinct. They appear to differ by their more elongate form, my deepest specimen, the one figured, having the depth of the body less than the length of the head, whereas in C. sprattus it is considerably deeper. That species further seems invariably to have but seven rays in the ventral fin without counting the imperfect short one in front. All of C. bassensis have eight. C. antipodum, Hector, is a very distinct species with a much shorter body, well developed abdominal scutes, and with the ventral placed below instead of just in advance of the anterior portion of the dorsal. From C. sajax, Jenyns, the new species is at once distinguished by the position of its ventral fin. In 1867 a note from Mr. J. E. Calder was published! in which he recorded an immense shoal of these Herrings being driven ashore in Simmons’ Cove, Bruni Island, Tasmania, by Barracouta, Kingfish and others. He considered there were about one hundred tons of them on the shore and fully two hundred more at the bottom of the water, all dead. Carts and boats were used to take them away for manure, yet they were scarcely lessened in quantity. Mr. Allport also noted that a similar shoal had been observed in 1844, and numbers of the fish had passed far up into the Derwent River. CLUPEA (CLUPANODON) NEOPILCHARDUS, Steindachner. Pilchard. Clupanodon neopilchardus, Steindachner, Denk. K. Akad. Waisss Wienk, xii. 1879, p- 12: Three specimens from 26-30 fathoms, eight miles off Wooded Bluff, Clarence River, New South Wales, are of 1 Calder—Proc. Roy. Soc. Tasm., 1867, p. 5. 18 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. interest as showing how far north this species extends on our coast. It extends around southern Australia and up to Hout- man’s Abrolhos on the west coast, and is also known from Tasmania and New Zealand. Famity ARGENTINIDE. GENUS ARGENTINA, Linneus. ARGENTINA ELONGATA, Hutton. Argentina elongata, Hutton, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (5), iil., 1879, p- 53, 12., Waite, ReewCantb. Mus. 1., TOL, Mp: TOL, pl. extv. Thirteen examples of this species, 65-125 mm. long, differ from a larger one from New Zealand only in the colour-mark- ings. All have a dark band above the silvery lateral line on which are arranged six to nine blackish spots. Near the tail there is a second series on the lateral line and more or less alternate to those above them. There is also a dark mark on the side of the snout. Though they can be traced, these markings are very indistinct in the larger specimen. They were taken at the following localities :— Entrance to Oyster Bay, Tasmania. Off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait, 30 fathoms. Fifteen miles off Norah Head, New South Wales, 45-58 fathoms. No species of this genus has been previously recorded from Australian waters. Famity SYMBRANCHID. GENUS CHEILOBRANCHUS, Richardson. CHEILOBRANCHUS RUFUS, Macleay. Red-banded Shore Eel. Chilobranchus rufus, Macleay, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, vi., 1881, p. 266. Cheilobranchus rufus, Waite, Rec. Austr. Mus., vi., 1906, Ps 195,,Di: XExXvig fig. 1: Numerous specimens were obtained in Oyster Bay, Tas- mania. Famity LEPTOCEPHALID4:. GENUS CONGERMUR-ENA, Kaup. CONGERMUR-ENA HABENATA, Richardson. Little Conger Eel. Congrus habenatus, Richardson, Zool. Ereb. & Terr., Fishes, 1848, p. 109, pl. 1., fig. 1-5. FISHES.—McOULLOCH. 19 Congromurena longicauda, Ramsay & Ogilby, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales (2), ii., 1888, p. 1022. A single specimen from Port Arthur, Tasmania, belongs to the long-tailed form of this species. Comparison with five other Australian specimens and one from New Zealand shows that the lengths of the body and tail are variable and have no specific value. As this is the only character which can be relied upon to distinguish C. longicauda from C. habenata, the former name can no longer stand. Famity MYRIDA. GENUS MuRANICHTHYS, Bleeker. MURENICHTHYS TASMANIENSIS, sp. nov. (Fig. 5.) Body worm-like, the depth 3.3 in the head. Head 12.8 in the total length, and 4.3 in the space between the gill opening and the vent. Eye 3.2 in the snout, which is long and obtusely pointed, and 4.8 in the head. Cleft of mouth extending far behind the eye, and 2.7 in the head; a longitudinal fold below the end of the mouth. Tube of anterior nostril with a minute exterior lobe; flap covering the posterior nostril overhanging the lip and placed below the anterior portion of the eye. Teeth in single rows on the jaws and palate; three or four larger ones on either side of the vomer. Rows of widely- spaced pores extend along each jaw, on the upper surface of the snout and behind the eyes. Gill-opening narrow, about as wide as the eye. The lateral line appears to be almost straight anteriorly, but the sides of the head between the gill-opening and the preoperculum are considerably damaged and render this character uncertain. Vent well in advance of the middle of the length, its distance from the tip of the snout 1.4 in the tail. Dorsal and anal fins very low, almost rudimentary. Origin of the dorsal a trifle nearer the tip of the snout than the tail, its distance from the vent equal to the length of the head. FIG, 5. Colour.—Pale green in formalin, the upper portion speckled with minute brown dots which are of uniform size. Anteriorly they are confined to the upper half of the body, but posteriorly they approach the lower surface. On the head they extend onto the sides and the lower jaw. Length 170 mm. One specimen from the entrance to Oyster Bay, Tasmania. 20 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. This species differs from the specimen I have identified as M. breviceps, Gunther, in the position of the origin of the dorsal which is behind instead of far in advance of the vent. It has also a much longer and sharper snout, smaller eye, and more rudimentary fins; the colour-marking is different, the spots on the back being similar to those on the sides, and they extend onto the sides of the head and the lower jaw. It is very closely allied to, and possibly identical with M. australis, Macleay, but differs from the five specimens I have examined of that species in having the origin of the dorsal far instead of only slightly behind that of the anal. The snout is also somewhat longer, being 4.8 in the head instead of 5.3. MUR&NICHTHYS AUSTRALIS, Macleay. (Fig. 6.) PMurenichthys gymnotus ?, Giinther, Chall. Rept., Zool., i., 1880, p. 30 (nec Bleeker). Murenichthys australis, Macleay, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, vi., 1881, p. 272. Body terete and vermiform, its depth behind the gill open- ing 3.3, behind the vent 3.9 in the head. Head 13 in the total length, and 4.5 in the einle Eye very small, nearly 3 in the snout, which is obtusely pointed and 5.3 in the head. Cleft of mouth extending far behind the eye, its length from the tip of the snout 2.7 in the head; a longitudinal fold below the end of the mouth. Tube of anterior nostril with a minute exterior lobe; flap covering the posterior nostril overhanging the lip and placed below the anterior margin of the eye. Teeth in single rows on the jaws and palate; three or four larger ones. on either side of the vomer. Rows of widely-spaced pores extend along each jaw, on the upper surface of the snout, behind the eye and up towards the origin of the lateral line. Gill opening as wide as the eye. Lateral line a little arched over the branchial sac. Vent well in advance of the middle of the length, its distance from the end of the snout 1.35 in the: tail. Dorsal and anal fins very low except near the end of the tail where they are a little broadened out and extend around the point. The origin of the dorsal is a little behind me of the- anal, not over the vent as stated by Macleay. FIG, 6. Colour.—After long preservation, uniform brown, with minute darker specks above the lateral line and on the head. where they extend onto the sides and lower jaw. FISHES.—McCULLOCH. 21 Described from the type, 248 mm. long, from Lane Cove, Port Jackson. Two other specimens are in the Macleay Museum without data, and two in the Australian Museum from Port Jackson. I am indebted to Professors W. A. Haswell and T. W. E. David for the opportunity of redescribing and figuring Macleay’s original specimen. It is very probable that the specimen from Port Jackson which Gunther doubtfully identified as M. gymnotus, Bleeker, is not that species but is M. australis. The two may be easily distinguished, the latter having but a single row of maxillary teeth instead of several, and its mouth extending not slightly but far behind the eye. Ogilby has proposed the genus Scolecenchelys! for this species, and in a letter he informs me that it ‘‘differs from Murenichthys in the much more slender and elongate body and the origin and development of the dorsal fin (as comparing australis with breviceps).’’ I regard these as specific rather than generic characters. MURAENICHTHYS BREVICEPS, Giinther. (Fig. 7.) ?Murenichthys macropterus, Klunzinger, Arch. Nat., EXXVili-, 15, £872, p. 43 (nec Bleeker). Murenichthys breviceps, Gunther, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (4), XVil.. 1970, p..401- A small specimen, 195 mm. long, from South Australia, is possibly the young of this species. As will be seen by the figure, its proportions do not quite agree with those of the type, which is twenty inches long, but the differences may perhaps be accounted for by its small size. The following is a description of the ‘‘Endeavour’’ specimen :— Body worm-like, the depth 4 in the head. Head 10.8 in the total length and 2.7 in the trunk. Eye 2.6 in the snout, which is 44 in the head. Cleft of the mouth extending far behind the eye and 2.7 in the head; a longitudinal fold below the end of the mouth. Tube of the anterior nostril very large, with a minute external lobe; flap covering the posterior nostril over- hanging the lip and placed just before the eye. Rows of large widely-spaced pores extend along each jaw, on the upper sur- face of the head and behind the eye. Lateral line arched above the branchial sac. Dorsal and anal fins very low, extending 1 Ogilby—Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, xxii., i189/, p. 24. 22 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. around the end of the tail. Origin of the dorsal a trifle nearer the tip of the snout than the vent, its distance from the gill opening 2.3 in that from the vent. FIG. 7. Colour.—Pale green in formalin, speckled with minute brown dots which are very small and crowded on the upper surface, and larger near the lateral line; anteriorly they scarcely extend below the middle of the body, but posteriorly they approach the ventral surface. Extreme end of the dorsal and caudal darker, the fins otherwise colourless. Trawled in 35 fathoms, south of St. Francis Island, South Australia. The specimens identified as Murenichthys macropterus, Bleeker, from Port Phillip and the Murray River, are probably not that species, but are M. breviceps, which is said by its author to differ from the former by its comparatively shorter head and longer snout. Famity AULOPIDZE. Genus AULOPUS, Cuvier. AULOPUS PURPURISSATUS, Richardson. . Sergeant Baker. Aulopus purpurissatus, Richardson, Icones Piscium, 1843, p. Wis spl. i.e tie. 3. Already known from western and eastern Australia, this species is now recorded from South Australia, a specimen having been trawled in 75 fathoms, fifty miles south of Cape Wiles. Famity SUDIDA. GENUS CHLOROPHTHALMUS, Bonaparte. CHLOROPHTHALMUS NIGRIPINNIS, Giinther. Cucumber Fish. Chlorophthalmus nigripinnis, Ginther, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (5); 1, 1878, p. 182, andg@hall Rept... Zool., xxi, p; 193, pli, fig..a; td., Went Proc. N.Z. Inst. sro cas p. 25, and Rec. ‘Cantb. Maise1s, mois, p.-104, pl. xxv. This species exhibits considerable variation in its markings according to age, young specimens of about five inches long having the sides blotched and spotted with bluish-grey, whereas others of eleven inches are immaculate. The mark- FISHES.—McCCULLOCH. BR ings on the fins also differ in intensity in a large series of specimens. C. nigripinnis was, until recently, known only from the deeper waters of New South Wales. Waite has recorded it from New Zealand, however, and it must now be added to the Victorian and Tasmanian lists, about one hundred and fifty specimens having been preserved from the following localities :— Oyster Bay, Tasmania, 40-60 fathoms. Off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait, 4o fathoms. Between Port Stephens and Newcastle, New South Wales, 22-60 fathoms. Famity MACRORHAMPHOSIDE. Genus MacroORHAMPHOSUS, Lacépede. MACRORHAMPHOSUS ELEVATUS, Waite. Bellows Fish. (Fig. 8.) Macrorhamphosus scolopax, var. elevatus, Waite, Mem. Avista Mise, 1V5, 1609, p. S@eapleawi., tig. br. Macrorhamphosus gallinago, Ogilby, Proc. Roy. Soc. Qld., XX1-, 19S, .p- 0. In the Report of the ‘‘Thetis’’ Expedition, Waite noted certain characters in which his specimens differed from the published descriptions of M. scolopax, but in consideration of the variations to which members of this genus are subject, he regarded the Australian representative as but a variety of that species. Having compared specimens of each, I am able to point out that there are well marked specific differences between them. Examples of M. elevatus of the same size as others of M. scolopax are much deeper and have shorter and thicker snouts. The variations in the lengths of the spines in different specimens of M. scolopax have been tabulated by Ginther,! and I find similar though less striking variations in the Australian species, but it is always longer and usually much longer than the snout in M. elevatus, whereas it appears to be usually tf not always shorter in M. scolopax. The large series of specimens available to me shows that the relative depth of the body increases considerably with age, but it is also clear that the exact form of the body differs even in specimens of the same length. Under these circum- stances I have no hesitation in regarding M. gallinago, Ogilby, as identical with M. elevatus, especially as there are ‘Thetis’? specimens which only differ from Ogilby’s descrip- 1 Giinther—Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., iii., 1861, p. 519. 24 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. tion in having eighteen instead of sixteen anal rays.t The last dorsal spine is minute and often rudimentary, while the position of the base of the second spine is altered by the development or otherwise of the hump on the back. In order to show the change with growth more clearly I give a figure of the smallest specimen of the series for com- parison with Waite’s figure of the adult. It is 66 mm. long and was trawled off Cape Three Points, New South Wales, in 32-40 fathoms. As Centriscus scolopax, this species has been recorded from Tasmania by Johnston,? and there is a specimen in the Aus- tralian Museum collection from Ulverstone. The ‘‘Endea- vour’’ trawled it at the following stations :— Twenty miles off Babel Island, Bass Strait, 68 fathoms. Off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait, 60 fathoms. Disaster Bay, New South Wales, 45 fathoms. Between Port Stephens and Sydney, New South Wales, 22-65 fathoms. Ogilby’s specimen of M. gallinago came from the Tweed River Heads at the northern boundary of New South Wales. GeENus CentrRIscops, Gill. CENTRISCOPS HUMEROSUS, Richardson. (Plate v., and fig. 9.) Centriscus humerosus, Richardson, Voy. ‘‘Erebus’’ and “Terror, ? Fishes, 1846, paes@s pl axxxiv.,/ figs. 5-62.92, Giinther, Brit. Mus. Cat. Hysh.vali., 1867, (p? 522: 1 Mr. J. D. Ogilby has very kindly compared ‘Thetis’ specimens with his type and he informs me that he considers them to be identical. He further notes that the latter has eighteen and not sixteen anal rays as described, a mistake due to a printer’s error. 2 Johnston—Proc. Roy. Soc. Tasm., 1882 (1883), p. 123. FISHES.—McCULLOCH. 25 As Richardson’s description and figure of this species were prepared from a dried specimen which had apparently shrunk considerably, they are very inaccurate. Certain errors were corrected by Gunther in his later description of the same specimen, so that it only remains to give reliable figures to place the species on a sound basis. My specimens differ from the original description in the following details. None show the mesial row of small scutes before the dorsal spine, while those on the sides and around the vent are so differently arranged that they must have been considerably distorted in the type. The ‘‘acute curved teeth at the base in front’’ of the dorsal spine really represent a small detached spine anteriorly, and a pair of lateral ones, the latter being only occasionally developed. Finally, the skin is not nearly so rough as figured, but is covered with closely-set microscopic spines which give a veivety feel to the touch. The form of the body changes greatly with growth, the body becoming much deeper and the snout longer, while the dorsal spines are greatly reduced. The eye is comparatively larger in young specimens. Full grown specimens develop a peculiar patch of bristles on the dorsal line just before the hump of the back. They are also very beautifully coloured in life, though the only tints remaining in my specimens are delicate rose-pink areas on the breast and upper portion of the sides which bear numerous large silvery spots and bars. A silvery pink bar is present on the snout below and before the eye. A broad oblique dark bar extends from behind the 26 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. pectorals to the origin of the anal, behind which is a similar lighter band, and both are bordered with silvery streaks. The smallest and largest specimens in the collection are the two selected for illustration, and measure 70 mm. and 265 mm. respectively. Mr. Dannevig says this species is exceed- ingly abundant in the deeper waters of southern Australia, and one hundred and seventy-eight specimens were preserved from the following localities :— Oyster Bay, Tasmania, 40-60 fathoms. Off Storm Bay, Tasmania. Babel Island, near Flinders Island, Bass Strait, 68 fathoms. East from E. Sister Island, Bass Strait, go fathoms. Sixty miles south of Cape Everard, Victoria, 60-70 fathoms. Famity SYNGNATHID. GENUS CORYTHROICHTHYS, Kaup. CORYTHROICHTHYS PHILLIPI, Lucas. (Fig. ro.) Syngnathus phillipi, Lucas, Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict. (n. ser.), lil., 16901, ps 12. Four specimens of this species were obtained in Oyster Bay, Tasmania. They differ from Lucas’ excellent descrip- tion only in having the osseus rings and fin rays rather more numerous which brings the formula up to the following :— D. 25-28, osseus rings 18-19 + 44-48. This species is very closely allied to the more northern C. margaritifer, Peters, but is distinguished by having a larger number of tail rings, the dorsal fin placed a little farther back in relation to the vent, and by the greater development of the ridges of the head and body, particularly the ventral keel. poe PE: FIG. 10. | Corythroichthys intestinalis, Ramsay. Having had occasion to compare the above-mentioned specimens with Syngnathus intestinalis, Ramsay,! I dis- covered that the types of that species were not Australian, as has been generally supposed, but came from Bougainville Island in the Solomon Group. Ramsay gave no locality, but merely stated that they were taken from the intestinal cavity 1 Ramsay—Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, v., 1881, p. 494. FISHES.—McOCULLOCH. 27 of Holothurie. Duncker! considers this species to be syn- onymous with C. conspicillatus, Jenyns,?2 together with several other species described by Jordan and his colleagues. Having examined all the material available to me, I am sure that C. intestinalis and C. waitei, Jord. & Seale,3 are identical, and, as I have recorded? the latter from Cooktown, Queens- land, Ramsay’s species is rightly included in Australian literature. | GENUS SOLEGNATHUS, Swainson. SOLEGNATHUS SPINOSISSIMUS, Giinther. Spiny Sea-Horse. Solenognathus spinosissimus, Giinther, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish. Vill. 1870, p. 195; id., Waite, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, IX.1(2)))) WOO4, p. 2228 pl. Xvil., figs. 5 and 8. Sixteen specimens of this species were preserved. They were obtained in 15-45 fathoms in Shoalhaven Bight, New South Wales. SOLEGNATHUS FASCIATUS, Giinther. Solenognathus fasciatus, Giinther, Chall. Rep., Zool., i., LOSo, Pp. 30, pl. xiv., fig. B.;7as Waite, Proc, Linn. Soe: NSS! Wales) ix. (2), 1894, ppyzee and 227, Duncker® considers this species to be identical with the pre- ceding. I have carefully compared the thirteen specimens obtained with those of S. spinosissimus and have endeavoured to find some more definite character than the form of the scutes to distinguish the two. They are, however, identical in every other respect, and though this one difference holds good in a large number of specimens, yet the species cannot but be considered to be based on a very uncertain footing. The scutes are well shown by Waite in the figures quoted. Though several specimens have the pseudo-marsupium in such a condition that it is evident that they were carrying eggs when obtained, only two have them still attached. The most perfect of these bears forty-five eggs, and it would seem that only a very few are missing. They are very similar to those of S. spinosissimus as described by Waite, but are in a less advanced stage of development, and are arranged in about five very irregular rows commencing directly behind the vent 1 Duncker—Faun. Stidwest-Austr., ii., 1909, p. 237. 2 Jenyns—Zool. Beagle, iii., 1842, p. 147, pl. xxvii., fig. 4. 3 Jordan and Seale—Bull. U.S. Bur. Fish., xxv., 1905 (1906), p. 212, fig. 17. 4 McCulloch—Proe. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, xxxv., 1910, p. 432. 5 Duncker—Faun. Sudwest-Austr., ii., 1909, p. 235. 28 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. and occupying thirteen tail-rings. ‘They were collected in the latter part of November, 1909. The specimens are from the following localities :— South-east from Babel Island, off Flinders Island, Bass Strait. Disaster Bay, southern New South Wales. SOLEGNATHUS ROBUSTUS, sp. nov. (Plate 1xQiee ee) D. 34, P. 24-25. Body rings, 26 + 50. Head 6°4 in the length and 3°7 in the trunk. Length of tail a little less than the distance between the vent and the pec- torals, its depth behind the dorsal 32 in the base of that fin. Snout 1°7 in the head, its depth nearly 5 in its length, and less than the diameter of the eye which is 4'1 in the snout. Narrowest interorbital width a little less than half the diameter of the eye. Dorsal fin occupying ten body rings, the length of its base almost equal to the distance between the tip of the snout and the posterior border of the eye. The lateral row of scutes is not continued along the side of the tail as in S. hardwickii, but passes upwards and merges into the ‘supero-lateral row, though, owing to the upper surface being very convex, this is less conspicuous than in S. spinosissimus and S. fasciatus. Scutes of the body with radiating lines of well-developed spines, and each with a stronger flattened one in the centre. On the anterior portion of the body and sides these central spines are higher than broad and_ widely separated, but before the dorsal on the mid-line they become broader ; on the tail, especially along the median superior and inferior lines, they are much broader than high, and are arranged so closely together as to form an almost continuous keel. The whole head and space before the pectorals is covered with uniform upstanding spines which are arranged in radiating lines on the opercles. The last thirty tail rings are prehensile and are provided with fleshy excrescences on their inferior surfaces. Total length, 300 mm. One specimen from 37 fathoms off Flinders Island, South Australia, August 30th, 1909. This species is easily distinguished from the others by its broad snout and very thick tail, and also by the form of the scutes. The following is a key to the Australian species :— a. Lateral row of scutes extending along the sides of the tail, not merging into the upper row. b. Scutes rugose but with scarcely any spines :— hardwicku. FISHES.—McCULLOCH. 29 aa. Lateral row of scutes merging into those on the upper edge of the tail behind the dorsal fin. c. Depth of the tail behind the dorsal 4 or more in the base of that fin. Depth of snout 6 or more in its length. d. Scutes intensely spiny and convex :—spinosissimus. dd. Scutes rugose with one spine and flatter :— fasciatus. cc. Depth of the tail behind the dorsal about 3 in the base of that fin. Depth of snout 5 in its length. e. Scutes with rows of spines and little convex :— vrobustus. Genus Hippocampus, Rafinesque. HIPPOCAMPUS ABDOMINALIS, Lesson. (Plate vi., fig. 1.) Hippocampus abdominalis, Lesson in Ferussac, Bull. Sci. Nats, xt.) 1827, "p. 127; id), wGunther, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., viii., 1870, p. 199; id., Klunzinger, Sitzb. Akad. Wiss.-Wien., Ixxx., i., p. 420;id., Johnston, Proc. Roy. Soc. Tasm., 1882 (1883), p. 135; id., Waite, Rec. Cantb. Miusiie5, Nios 1, 1907, p. 5 jm@@enwloc: cit.,, 1911, ps 175; pl. xxvii. ; id., Duncker, Faun. Siidwest-Austr. ii., 1909, Deas The specimen figured is a very large one from Merimbula, near Twofold Bay, New South Wales, where this species is said to be common. It is recorded from New Zealand, Tas- mania and Victoria, while Ginther records a specimen in the British Museum from Sydney which was presented by Sir John Richardson. If this specimen really came from Port Jackson the species must be very rare here, as it has not been included in any of the catalogues of New South Wales fishes, nor have any local specimens come under my notice. HIPPOCAMPUS GRACILIFORMIS, sp. nov. (Plate: vi., “iesmes) Deez, Ps 16. Rings 12 + ao Body slender, its greatest depth being only 1°5 the width behind the pectorals. Tail nearly twice as long as the dis- tance between the tip of the coronet and the vent. Snout very short and thick, as long as the postorbital portion of the head. Eye 12 in the snout. Supra-orbital spines low and triangular, converging before the eyes where they form a prominent keel on the proximal portion of the snout. Behind the eyes the profile extends obliquely upwards to just before 3 30 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. the coronet where it is notched. The coronet is quadrangular with very indistinct tubercles and ridges. Tubercies of the body almost uniformly obtuse, the lateral row a little more developed than the others; below the dorsal fin those of the back are somewhat enlarged. On the tail the fifth, ninth and twelfth are prominent. None of the tubercles bear filaments. The dorsal fin stands on four body and three tail rings; its anterior portion is damaged but it appears to have had twenty-seven rays. Colour.—Light brown, the tail with nine darker cross- bands. The head has large scattered dark spots arranged around the eye and on the snout, and there are others on the sides and under surfaces of the anterior portion of the body. Total length 87 mm. One specimen taken somewhere near Bass Strait, but the exact locality is unknown. The large number of rays in the dorsal fin distinguishes this from all other Australian species except H. abdominalis, Lesson. From that species it is easily separated by its slender body, the form of the supraocular spines and coronet, and the poor development of the tubercles. Famity SCOMBRESOCID:. GENUS SCOMBRESOX, Lacépede. SCOMBRESOX FORSTERI, Cuvier and Valenciennes. Scombresox forsteri, Cuvier and Valenciennes, Hist. Nat. Poiss., xvill., 1846, p. 481. A single specimen was taken in a landing net at night, one hundred and twenty miles south-south-west of St. Francis Island, South Australia. FaMILy EXOCCETIDE. Genus Exonautes, Jordan and Evermann. EXONAUTES SPECULIGER, Cuvier and Valenciennes. Flying Fish. Exoccetus speculiger, Cuvier and Valenciennes, Hist. Nat. Poiss;,. xix.,, 1646, p. 94: Cypsilurus speculiger, Jordan and Seale, Bull. U.S. Bur. Pish.,, XXv., 1905 (1906); qarzogy e713: A single specimen agreeing perfectly with the descriptions and figure quoted was obtained between Port Stephens and Newcastle, New South Wales. FISHES.—McCULLOCH. 31 Famity ATHERINID. GENUS ATHERINA, Linne@us. ATHERINA DANNEVIGI, sp. nov. (Plate xvi., tipee2.) Devitie ier iy hh AS 1. 12-1 See PAL | Ve tons (Clr. Scales 73-75. Body very elongate, the depth 6°5 to 7°3 in the length to the hypural. Head 4 to 4°3. Eye 3 to 34 in the head, equal to or longer than the snout. Mouth oblique, not very large, the gape reaching almost to the anterior orbital rim; maxillary continued backwards to below the anterior third of the eye. The teeth are exceedingly minute and appear to be present on the jaws, vomer and palatines. Gill-rakers slender, equal to about half the length of the eve, sixteen on the lower limb of the first arch. Upper surface of the head flat, the interorbital width equal to the diameter of the eye. Muciferous system well developed, with large open pores. A row of about nine commences on the snout and extends over the eye, then downwards and along the upper margin of the opercles. Nine more are arranged from behind the eye, around the angle of the preoperculum to the mouth, where they join another row running along the margin of the preorbital. Five more pores are found along each ramus of the lower jaw. Scales extending forwards on the back as far as the hinder portion of the eye, and there are about thirty-nine along the mid-line of the back to the first dorsal, and twenty-four between the two dorsals. Those on the sides of the body are rounded but for a small median lobe which gives them an angular appearance. There are three rows on the cheeks and about seven on the operculum. They also extend well onto the base of the caudal fin. Origin of the first dorsal behind the ventrals but well before the middle of the distance between the tip of the snout and the base of the tail; second spine longest, equal to two-thirds or more of the space between the tip of the snout and the hinder orbital margin. Soft dorsal commencing over the first third of the anal, its third ray a trifle shorter than the longest spines. Anal similar to the soft dorsal but with a longer base. Origin of ventrals almost midway between the snout and the end of the anal, or a little nearer the latter. Pectorals reaching to above the base of the ventrals. Vent between the ventrals and rather nearer their tips than their bases. Colour.—Sandy yellow (in formalin), each scale of the back margined with a row of minute brown dots. A silver 32 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS band, which is rather wider than the row of scales it covers, is uniformly dotted with minute brown specks, and may or may not be defined by a black line above. Occiput darker. Described from three specimens 75 to 85 mm. long from two stations—Spencer’s Gulf, South Australia, 20 fathoms, and the entrance to Oyster Bay, Tasmania. Selected type 75 mm. long from the latter locality. This is distinguished from all other Australian species by its very small scales. It is apparently nearest to A. hep- setoides, Richardson,! but the description of that species is so imperfect I am unable to compare it satisfactorily. Richardson, however, compared his species with 4. hepsetus, Linn., to which, as his name denotes, he considered it very similar. The ‘‘Endeavour’’ specimens are so very different in appearance from the latter that I have little doubt they are distinct from Richardson’s species also, and this, together with the fact that they come from somewhat deep water induces me to describe them as new. GENUS T4:NIOMEMBRAS, Ogilby. Taeniomembras, Ogilby, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, xxiii. 1898, p. 41. Ogilby has erected this genus for Atherina microstoma, Ginther, considering that it differs from Atherina by (1) its more elongate body, (2) pointed snout, (3) small mouth, (4) stronger dentition, (5) shorter, stouter and fewer gill-rakers. I regard 1, 2 and 4 as being of specific value only, but 3 and 5 may perhaps be conveniently used to split up the large number of Australian species of Atherina. Notwithstanding Gunther’s statement, ‘‘teeth conspicuous in the jaws and on the vomer,’’ Ogilby describes the latter as smooth, while he finds a single row on the palatines. These are lacking in the specimens described below, but the vomerine teeth are well developed. ‘T4NIOMEMBRAS MICROSTOMA, Giinther. (Plate x., fig. 2.) Atherina microstoma, Ginther, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., i1., 1861, p. 401; 1d., Macleay, Proc: Linn. Soc.: N.S. Wales, Vi.,5 1881, p. 39; id., Johnston; Proc. Roy.Sec. Tasm 5 1882 (1883), p. 122, and 1890 (1891), p. 34. Br; 6-73 Ds -Vi.-Vil. 10-11 7g ait > PS pa-14 Ve se Cy 17-;25¢. Tat. 38-40; (Sc.. trite 1 Richardson—Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., xi. (1), 1843, p. 178. FISHES.—MCCULLOCH. a3 Height of the body 5?-7, length of the head 4-44 in the length to the hypural. Eye 3, a little wider than the inter- orbital space, snout 44 in the head. Depth of the caudal peduncle a little less than the width of the eye. Body moderately elongate, somewhat compressed, its breadth equal to about two-thirds of its height. Head flat above with a series of very large pores extending from the snout, over the eye, to a canal above the operculum. A second series crosses the snout in front of the eye and follows the preorbital, joining another which extends around the margins of the preoperculum. There is a series on each ramus of the lower jaw, and a single pore behind the eye. A few large scales on the upper surface of the head extending forward to the eyes, snout and preorbital region bare. A single row of large scales on the cheek, and three rows on the operculum; a single row on the sub- and interoperculum. Mouth small, the maxillary not reaching the anterior margin of the eye; jaws subequal. Teeth minute but distinct, in several rows on the anterior parts of both jaws, none on the sides; a well-developed patch on the vomer, palatines tooth- less. Gill-rakers short and stout, the longest less than a third the length of the eye; about fifteen on the first arch. Scales of the body large, cycloid and concentrically striated. There are thirty-eight to forty on the silvery lateral band from behind the base of the pectoral to the hypural, and eight in a transverse series not counting the median ones on the back and belly. There are fourteen to fifteen between the nape and the first dorsal fin. Origin of the dorsal a little behind that of the ventrals, and a little nearer the end of the snout than the hypural. The spines are very weak and flexible, the second and third the longest, subequal, and about half as long again as the eye. The distance between the first spines of the two dorsals equals that between the end of the second and the hypural. Anal originating well in advance of the second dorsal, the length of its base once and a half in its distance from the hypural. Margins of the pectorals rounded, the second and third upper rays the longest, not quite reaching the vertical of the ventrals. Ventrals reaching back a little more than half their distance from the anal, the vent placed between their tips. Chee eee in formalin with a broad dark silvery lateral band along the fourth row of scales. The upper parts of the head and back are densely spotted with minute olive green dots, which also border the scales of the body above the lateral band and sometimes those below it as well. All the fins with more or less numerous scattered dots on the rays. 34 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. Described from five specimens, about 63 mm. long, taken in the estuary of the Derwent River, Tasmania, by Mr. E. F. Lovett, who presented them to the Australian Museum. Two other very battered specimens are in the ‘‘Endeavour’’ collection from Storm Bay, Tasmania. They differ from Ginther’s description only in being rather more slender, in having one ray less in the anal fin, and in the position of the silvery lateral band, but I do not regard any of these as being of much importance. FamMiILty STROMATEID. GENUS SERIOLELLA, Guichenot. SERIOLELLA BRAMA, Giinther. Snotgall Trevally, Trevalla. (Plate ix., fig. 1.) Neptonemus brama, Ginther, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., ii., 1860, p- 390; id., Johnston, Proc. Roy. Soc. Tasm., 1882 (1883), pp. 85 and 120. Neptonemus? travale, Castelnau, Proc. Zool. Soc. Vict., I 1872, pam tG: Seriolella brama, Regan, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (7), x., 1902, p: 120; td., Waite, Reegt@antb, Mus.,4., 191i; psec; plat Notwithstanding the numerous differences appearing in the two descriptions of S. brama and S. trevale, | agree with Regan that they represent but one species. I think there can be no doubt that my specimens are correctly identified with S. brama, while the fact that they were recognised as_ the common trevalla or trevally of the Melbourne markets by Mr. Dannevig bears out their association with S. trevale which was originally obtained from that source. I have examined over a dozen specimens from various localities extending from Tasmania to Port Jackson and find the variation in the number of fin-rays and spines to be con- siderable, as the following selected examples will show :— (5) De, ‘vils 15,305. A. iii., 2eembeges. (2) vais die e anaes iii..23; P.2t: (3) D. vii. iezocgA yin. 21; P. 20; (4) Diva ii. 32; A. iii. 23; P. 20. The lengths of the spines before the second dorsal are very variable, and the second may be replaced by a jointed ray. The disagreement in the propor- tions of the head and body, as given by the two authors, is doubtless accounted for by a different system of measuring adopted by each. The depth in my specimens is about 2°6 in the length to the hypural and 3°4 in that to the tip of the tail. The only other important difference is in the armature of FISHES.—McCULLOCH. 35 the preoperculum, as described by Castelnau, but I find this to be a very unreliable character, some specimens having the ridges and denticulations distinctly, though feebly, developed, while in others there is no trace of them. The following description is drawn up from all the material available to me :— DP wit-vile t=.) 20-34 A. iit. Saeee PY 20-295 Vii 1. 955 C. 17; 1. lat. about 90. Depth 2°6, head 34 to 34, pectoral 3 to 3°4, base of dorsal 1°7, base of anal 3 to 3°2 in length to the hypural. Caudal peduncle 3°5. Eye-opening 4 to 4°5. Vertical diameter of orbit 3°4 to 4 in the head. Body compressed, rather deep, its dorsal and ventral pro- files almost equally arched, covered with moderate cycloid scales, those of the lateral line somewhat smaller than the others. Caudal peduncle narrow. Whole upper surface and sides of the head covered with a thick fleshy skin which largely hides the scales and other characters beneath it. Snout tumid, the nostrils placed close together and nearer the end of the snout than the eye, the anterior the largest and rounded, the posterior slit-like. Mouth oblique, maxillary small and weak, and reaching to or a little beyond the vertical of the anterior margin of the eye. Preorbital narrow, its margin smooth or crenulated. Eye large, placed in the middle line of the head. Bones of the head very weak, their margins either feebly denticulated or smooth; posterior margin of the preoperculum emarginate, the angle produced and broadly rounded. Oper- culum terminating in a very thin flat point margined with skin. Teeth extremely fine and small, arranged in a single row on each jaw; vomer, palatines and tongue toothless. Dorsal fin commencing a little before, over, or behind the base of the pectoral ; the spinous portion is low and the middle spines the longest. If present, the*second spine of the second dorsal is generally higher than any of those of the first; the second and third rays are the longest and about as long as the distance between the tip of the snout and the hinder margin of the eye. The two first spines of the anal are short and thick and somewhat detached from the rest of the fin; third spine longer and weaker and adpressed to the first ray. Soft portion of the fin similar to, but lower than, the second dorsal. Pectoral falecate reaching to or beyond the vertical of the first anal ray. Ventrals rather small, placed below the posterior base of the pectorals, and reaching about two-thirds of the distance between their insertion and the vent. Caudal deeply forked. Colour.—Body with large somewhat irregular blotches dis- tributed over its upper half, of which the most conspicuous ts a 36 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. dark rounded one at the origin of the lateral line. Two large and less distinct marks descend from the origin and middle of the second dorsal to below the lateral line, and besides these there are numerous smaller markings scattered over the body. These markings have not been noted by Castelnau, whose description was prepared from fresh specimens, and as all mine have lost most of their scales it may be that they are not shown or are indistinct in perfect examples. A dark bar extends vertically across the eye which is otherwise golden. Dorsal, anal, pectorals and ventrals dusky, especially towards their margins. Fifteen specimens were preserved from the following localities :—— Spencer Gulf, South Australia, 20 fathoms. Forty miles west of Kingston, South Australia, 30 fathoms. Off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait, 40 fathoms. Oyster Bay, Tasmania. SERIOLELLA PUNCTATA, Forster. (Plate xan. 1.) Gasterosteus punctatus, Forster, in Bloch and Schneider, Syst. Ichth.,; 1801, p. 36: Neptonemus bilineatus, Hutton, Trans. N. Zeal. Inst., v., 1872, p. 261, pl. viii. Seriolella bilineata, Regan, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (7), x., 1902, p. 128. Seriolella punctata, Waite, Rec. Cantb. Mus., i., 1911, p. 231, plait. IDS Vi.-=Vil.. 34-39; A. ili. 22224eeP. 20-22: V1 52 Comm Depth 3°3 to 4, head 3°4 to 3°6, pectoral about 4, base of dorsal 1°7, and base of anal 3°8 in the length to the hypural. Caudal peduncle 4 to 4°5, eye-opening 4°8 to 5'5, vertical diameter of the orbit 3°4 to 3°8 in the head. Body compressed, elongate, the dorsal and ventral profiles evenly arched, upper parts covered with large pores. Caudal peduncle narrow. Upper surface and sides of the head covered with a thick fleshy porous skin which hides the scales and other characters beneath it. Snout somewhat fleshy and rounded. Nostrils close together, nearer the tip of the snout than the eye; the posterior longer than the anterior which is round. Mouth oblique; maxillary rather narrow and weak, FISHES.—MCCULLOCH. 37 extending to or beyond the vertical of the anterior margin of the eye. Preorbital narrow. Eye moderate, placed a little above the mid-line of the head. Opercular bones very weak, and with smooth margins in all my specimens, but they are doubtless subject to the same variation as in S. brama. Posterior margin of the preoperculum qblique and usually a little emarginate, the angle produced and broadly rounded; operculum terminating in a very thin flat point margined with skin. Dorsal fin commencing a little behind the vertical of the base of the pectoral; the spinous portion is low and the middle spines are the longest. The third or fourth rays are the longest, but are shorter than the distance between the tip of the snout and the hinder margin of the eye. The two first spines of the anal are very small and more or less hidden in the skin; the third is longer and adpressed to the first ray. Soft portion of the fin similar to, but lower than that of the dorsal. Pectoral falcate not nearly reaching the vertical of the vent. Ventrals small, inserted just behind the pectorals and reaching one-third or more of the distance between them and the anal. Caudal forked. Colour.—Body with numerous small round spots along the middle line, and a large dark mark behind the head, near the base of the lateral line, which is deeper than broad. A dark vertical bar across the eye. Pectorals, dorsal and anal fins dusky, especially towards their margins. Ventrals and caudal lighter. Longest specimen 280 mm. Seriolella porosa, Guichenot,! is said to differ from S. punctata in being more slender, the depth being 4 to 44 in the length as against 33 to 3%. The original figure of that species, however, agrees very well in this respect with my specimens of S. punctata. Regan? considers the Tasmanian S. dobula, Gunther, to be synonymous with S. porosa, and I think it possible that both will prove to be merely variations of Forster’s species, though I have seen no specimens in, which the depth is 44 in the length as described by Gunther. Two specimens were preserved which were taken between Port Stephens and Newcastle, New South Wales, 22-60 fathoms, and seven others from the Victorian coast and from Oyster Bay, Tasmania. 1 Guichenot in Gay—Fauna Chilena, Pisces, 1847, p. 238; Atlas ii., Ichth. PL Gviley hen 2. 2 Regan—Ann. Mag. Nat Hist. (7), x., 1902, p. 128. 28 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. FamMiLy GADID. GENuS PuysicuLus, Kaup. PHYSICULUS BARBATUS, Giinther. Rock Cod, Cape Cod, Red Cod. Pseudophycis barbatus, Ginther, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (3), xi., 1863, p. 116; id., Castelnau, Proc. Zool. Acclim. Soc: Vict., 1., 1872, p.eiG2eiid.. McCoy, Prodr: Zool Viect., pl. xx., 1878; id2@ johnston, Proc. Roy. See Tasm., 1882 (1883), pp. 88 and 126. Physiculus palmatus, (Klunzinger, Arch. fur. Naturg., XXKVIM da TO7e, P- 3S: Lotella grandis, Ramsay, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, v., 1881, p. 462. Physiculus barbatus, Waite, Mem. N.S. Wales Nat. Club, 1904, p. 24. Only one specimen of this common southern species was preserved. It is fifteen inches long and was obtained off Cape Everard, Victoria, in 70 fathoms. There seems to be little doubt that P. palmatus, Klunzinger, from Hobson’s Bay, Port Phillip, is identical with the common Victorian Rock Cod since the description agrees perfectly with that given by McCoy of the latter species. The fact that KXlunzinger compared his fish with P. breviusculus, Richard- son, only, indicates that he was unaware of Gunther’s species. FamIty MACROURID. GENUS CCLORHYNCHUS, Giorna. CG@LORHYNCHUS AUSTRALIS, Richardson. Lepidoleprus australis, Richardson, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1839,. p. 100, and Trans. Zool{sec., 1i., 1840, p. 151, pl vill, ne. 1. Macrurus australis, Giinther, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., iv., 1862, p- 391; id., Johnston, Proc. Roy. Soc. Tasm., 1882 (7883), p. 127+: td., Gunther, Chall. Rept., Zool. xxi, 1S07, p- 127. Celorhynchus mortoni, Ogilby, Proc. Roy. Soc. Tasm., 1896 (1897), Pp. 83. Coeelorhynchus australis, Waite, Rec. Cantb. Mus., i., 1911, Ps L7goieen ky Dl: XIX. jaueene When recording Optonurus denticulatus from New South Wales I noted! that several specimens lacked the ends of their 1 McCulloch—Rec. Austr. Mus., vi., 1907, p. 746. FISHES.—MCCULLOCH. 39 tails, and that in one the dorsal and anal fins had grown together around the injured portion, thereby giving it the appearance of being perfect. Many examples of C. australis in the ‘‘Endeavour”’ collection exhibit this same peculiarity, some having the tail so truncated and the anal rays so com- plete around it that they almost seem to have heterocercal instead of leptocercal tails. Dissection shows that the injured vertebra spreads out into a cartilaginous fan somewhat resembling a true hypural bone, to which the rays are movably articulated. A large series of specimens, seventy-five in number, con- clusively proves that C. mortoni, Ogilby (the type specimen of which is lost), is identical with Richardson’s species, and that the differences noted between the two are nearly all due to the one having.a more perfect and therefore longer tail than the other. The only character that cannot be so explained lies in the armature of the scales, Ogilby counting 18 to 23 ridges in C. mortoni, while C. australis is said to have 12 to 18 only. I find that the number varies according to the size of the specimens, my smallest having only six ridges, whereas a large scale in a big example has twenty-two. When fresh, the specimens were greyish with darker bands extending along the body and occupying the overlapping por- tions of each row of scales. There is a more or less distinct dark band between the eyes, and the operculum is blackish. Upper half of the first dorsal black with a lighter margin. Anal dark with a white border. Pectorals and ventrals dusky with lighter edges. Specimens were preserved from off Storm Bay, Tasmania, 60 fathoms, and from Oyster Bay, Tasmania. Famity BERYCID/. GENUS AUSTROBERYX, gen. nov. Body rather deep, compressed, covered with moderately large, ctenoid scales which are regularly arranged. Abdomen trenchant, with a row of slightly enlarged, keeled scales. Head large, with thin bones and high ridges which have deep muciferous Cavities between them; the exposed bones rough with raised strie. Snout short, mouth oblique, the chin prominent. Eye large. Jaws, vomer and palatines with villiform teeth. Opercles serrated ; operculm with two spines, preoperculum with more or less strongly developed spines on its inner border. Dorsal with six or seven spines which in- crease regularly in height, and eleven to fourteen soft rays. Anal with four spines and twelve to fourteen rays, its base shorter than that of the dorsal. Ventrals with one spine and seven rays. 40 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS Type Beryx affinis, Gunther. B. gerrardi, Gunther, and B_ lineatus, Cuvier and Valenciennes, also belong to this genus. They are distinguished from Beryx, Cuvier (type B. decadactylus, Cuv. and Val.), by having the anal shorter than the dorsal and composed of only 12-14 rays instead of 26-30. The bones of the head also appear to be more strongly armed, and the suborbitals are broader. Regan! has placed Beryx affinis, Gunther, and its allies in the genus Hoplopteryx, Agassiz?, of which most of the species are Cretaceous fossils. Judging from Woodward’s restoration of H. lewesiensis,’ Mantell, however, the recent forms seem to differ in having the opercular bones more strongly armed and in having much smaller scales. Note on the genera Trachichthys, Shaw and Nodder, and Hoplostethus, Cuvier and Valenciennes.—It would seem that Trachichthys (type T. australis, Shaw & Nodder) is a mono- typic genus characterised by having three dorsal and two anal spines which are placed close together, and, like the rays, are entirely covered with minute asperities. Minute tuberculiform teeth are crowded on the jaws, vomer and palatines. Ginther4 counted three spines and twelve rays in the dorsal, and two spines and ten rays in the anal of the type specimen of T. australis. McCoy® describes iv./11 and iii./g (10) respectively, but has mistaken the anterior rays for spines, while Waite® expressly states that there are three and not two anal spines in Trachichthys. I have counted nine specimens of T. australis, and find the number of spines and rays to be as stated by Giinther. Boulenger’ has united Hoplostethus with Trachichthys, re- garding some Australian and New Zealand species (T. inter- medius, Hector, and T. elongatus, Gunther) as intermediate between the two. Both these fishes, however, bear little resemblance to T. australis, having four and six dorsal spines and three anal spines which are well separated, and which, together with the rays, are not covered with minute asperities. They are much nearer to Hoplostethus (type H. mediter- rvaneus, Cuv. & Val.), but both differ from that genus, as defined by Jordan and Fowler,’ in possessing microscopic 1 Regan—Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (8), vii., 1911, p. 5. 2 Agassiz—Poiss. Foss., iv., 1838, p. 4. 3 Woodward—Brit. Mus. Cat. Foss. Fish., iv., 1901, p. 398, fig. 31. 4 Gunther—Cat. Fish. Brit. Mus., i., 1859, p. 10. 5 McCoy—Prodr. Zool. Vict., 1886, pl. cxiv. 6 Waite—Mem. Austr. Mus., iv., 1899, p. 66. 7 Boulenger—Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (7), ix., 1902, p. 202. 8 Jordan & Fowler—Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., xxvi., 1902, p. 7. FISHES.—McCULLOCH. 4l vomerine teeth, while T. elongatus also has only four instead of six dorsal spines. In all other respects, however, they agree with Hoplostethus, T. intermedius indeed being very closely allied to H. mediterraneus, so that I think it better to expand the limits of that genus to include them rather than form an unnatural group by uniting Hoplostethus and Tra- chichthys. AUSTROBERYX GERRARDI. Giinther. (Plate viii.). Beryx Gerrard’, Gunther, Ann.’ Mag. Nat. Hist. (5), xx., TG07, P- 238, fie. Bio Wa Vig ea A. iV., T2-neement ss Voi, 7 Cl 1% 1. lat. 36-39; 1. tr. 6 + 11. Height 118-2, head 24-22 in the length to the hypural. Eye 24 in the head. Interorbital width slightly less than 2 of the eye, and equal to the length of the snout. Base of the anal 2 that of the dorsal which equals the length of the head. Caudal peduncle ¢ of the eye and almost equal to the post-orbital portion of the head. Body short and deep. Upper profile very convex from the snout to the first dorsal spine which marks its highest point. The curve from the snout to the ventral fin is much less than that of the back; the line between the ventrals and the anal is straight and bears 9-11 keeled scales which decrease in size backwards. Maxillary reaching to below the posterior third of the eye, stiliform anteriorly but very broad behind; there is a small rough patch of spines on the narrow portion which is in con- tact with the supplemental bone, but the rest is smooth. Supplemental bone with numerous ridges each ending in spines. Turbinal bones bilobed and margined with sharp spines. Preorbital denticulated, without a curved spine but with a slight notch at its upper end to receive a blunt spine projecting from the maxillary. Bones of the infraorbital arch spine-like and roughened. Interorbital space narrowest above the middle of the eye, becoming a little wider forwards, then narrowing again towards the nostrils. Supraciliary edges finely denticulated, terminating anteriorly above the nostrils; between these are two curved, slightly roughened ridges which approach each other at either end and enclose a some- what elliptical area, with truncate ends, which is 34-4 times as long as broad. Above the first third of the eye these ridges each give off a branch which again divides and passes back- wards ending in some rather strong spines some distance before the suprascapular. Preoperculum with two parallel margins, the hinder borders of which are serrated; the angle of the inner margin is formed 42 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIO RESULTS. of two flattened, denticulated spines, while that of the outer is armed with smaller simple spines. Both lower borders finely denticulated. Operculum narrow, its anterior halt covered with scales, the posterior portion with coarse striz ending in marginal points; two strong spines on the upper portion of the bone. Subopercle with one or two small spines at its lowest point. Interoperculum with a broad notch near its junction with the subopercle, its angle and lower border striated and finely denticulated. Margin of the suprascapular denticulated, its lower portion with an oblique ridge terminat- ing in some enlarged spines. Nostrils more widely separated than in 4. affinis, the hinder ones being very close to the orbital margins. First bran- chiostegals very slender, second to fifth “broad and denti- culated below, the others smooth. Gill-rakers very long and slender posteriorly, about half as long as the eye; twenty-two on the lower limb of the first arch. Exceedingly fine villiform teeth on the jaws without larger ones near “the middle. A small triangular patch on the vomer and a long cuneiform band on each palatine bone. With the exception of the form of the ridges on top of the head, the position of the nostrils and the absence of enlarged teeth, all the characters of the head are almost exactly similar to those of young A. affinis. Dorsal spines gradually increasing in length, the last 14-14 as long as the eye and 2 the length of the second ray; all are more or less angular and striated. Second ray the longest, about 2} as long as the last. The first anal spine is placed below the third “dorsal ray, the fourth equals the fifth dorsal spine in length and is about § 2 as long as the second ray; the last ray is placed far behind that of the dorsal. Pectoral not quite 2 in the head and reaching to above the base of the anterior anal rays. Ventrals with strong, flattened, striated spines, 3 as long as the rays which extend to the base of the fourth anal spine. Caudal deeply forked, the lobes somewhat pointed and about equal to the head in length. All the scales rather coarsely denticulated, the external half of their exposed surfaces with smooth ridges ending in mar- ginal teeth. Bases of the dorsal and anal fins protected by sheaths formed of several rows of scales, the outermost of which is the largest. A small patch of scales on the cheeks. A large angular scale at the axil of the ventral fin. Lateral line straight, each scale with a median excavation. Colourless in formalin. Described from twelve specimens, 150-200 mm. in length. FISHES.—McCULLOCE. 43 This species is distinguished from A. affinis and A. lineatus by its small number of scales on the lateral line, different fin formule and by its short and deep form. Trawled in 37 fathoms off Flinders Island, Investigator Group, South Australia. AUSTROBERYX AFFINIS, Giinther. Nanny gai. (Fig. rae Beryx affinis, Gunther, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., 1., 1859, p. 13, and Anne Mae~ Nat. Hist. (gigs, 1887, p: 238, fig.; ids Opilby, Ed. Fish. N.S. Wales, 1893, p. 69,pl. xxi-; id., Stead, Ed. Fish. N.S. Wales, 1908, p. 48, pl. xvii. Hoplopteryx affinis, Regan, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (8), vii., pass plo u This species is extremely variable with age, the young being short bodied and round, and the depth only 22 in the total length, while large specimens are much more elongate with the depth 34. The form and armature of the bones of the head is essentially the same in both, but those of the young have much more spinate edges, and their surfaces are smooth and with but few ridges. The same remarks apply to the (yy ee MOT YY ¥ rat 4 if >— SS >= reer {f Lgl Af f } == ae Hale ta : mee Ae eee =a FIG. 11. scales which have very coarsely denticulated edges and almost smooth surfaces; in the adult the denticulations are much finer and they are continued back as ridges almost half way across the exposed portions of the scales. The accompanying figure represents my smallest specimen (70 mm. long). 44 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. Constant characters appear to be afforded by the number of spines and rays in the dorsal and anal fins, and the number of perforated scales along the lateral line. In nine examples 23-16 inches long, I find them to be as follows :—D. vii/11-12, A. iv./12, lateral line 42-44. Gunther has stated that the length of the head equals the height of the body. As this character has been used in com- parison with other species, it is worth noting that it is con- siderably shorter in all the specimens I have seen, and is shown to be so in all the figures published. Only three specimens were preserved in the ‘‘Endeavour”’ collection which came from the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait, and sixty miles south of Cape Everard, Victoria, 60-70 fathoms. GENUS PARATRACHICHTHYS, Waite. PARATRACHICHTHYS TRAILLI, Hutton. Paratrachichthys trailli, Hutton—Waite, Mem. Austr. Mus., iv., 1899, p. 65. Waite noted that the number and form of the abdominal scutes of his single specimen differed slightly from the des- criptions and figure of Tvachichthys macleayi, Johnston, and T. trailli, Hutton. In the ‘‘Endeavour’’ specimens I find from twelve to sixteen scutes, and the first either divided or single, and with one median or two lateral spines. This, therefore, proves the identity of T. macleayi with Hutton’s species. Referring to the vomerine teeth, Waite states that the patch could be covered by a pin’s head. This agrees well with most of my specimens, but in others they are entirely wanting. The collection includes seventeen specimens from off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait, 40 fathoms, and Oyster Bay, Tasmania, 40-60 fathoms. Famity MONOCENTRID. Genus Monocentris, Bloch and Schneider. MONOCENTRIS GLORIA-MARIS, de Vis. Knight Fish. Monocentris gloria-maris (de Vis.)—Waite, Mem. Austr. Mus., iv., 1899, p. 67, pl. vill., figs. 1-2, and Rec. Austr. Mus., vi., 1905, p. 60. Two specimens were obtained fifteen miles off Saddle Hill, New South Wales, in 35 fathoms. FISHES.—McCULLOCH. 45 Famity PEMPHERID&. GENUS PEMPHERIS, Cuvier. PEMPHERIS MULTIRADIATA, Klunzinger. Pempheris multiradiatus, Klunzinger, Sitzb. Akad. Wiss. Wien ixxx. (1.51570, p- 35m Pempheris macrolepis, Macleay, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, v., 1881, p. 516; id.,. Waite, Mem. Austr. Mus., Wis, LOGO: Ds 74 Plet X Pempheris lineatus, Ogilby, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, x., 1886, p. 447. -Having carefully examined all the material at my disposal, I have no doubt that P. multiradiata is identical with P. macrolepis, as has been suggested by Macleay.!_ Klunzinger’s description agrees exactly with my specimens which come from various localities between the Bellinger River, New South Wales, and Kingston, South Australia. In twelve examples I find the following number of fin-rays and scales :— D. v./11-13, A. iii./32-38, lateral line to the hypural 46-50. Waite (loc. cit.) has suggested that P. multivadiata is identical with P. compressa, Shaw, but I can see no reason for this conclusion. The former has most of its scales cycloid, only those on the anterior and lower portion of the head, breast, and on the back before the dorsal fin being ctenoid. In P. compressa all are very distinctly ctenoid, and they are much smaller, there being 62-64 along the lateral line instead of only 46-50. The ‘‘Endeavour’’ specimens were taken at the following stations :— Off Bellengen, New South Wales, 40-52 fathoms. Between Port Stephens and Newcastle, New South Wales, 22-60 fathoms. Shoalhaven Bight, New South Wales, 15-45 fathoms. Off the east coast of Flinders Island and north of Goose Island, Bass Strait. Forty miles off Kingston, South Australia, 30 fathoms. PEMPHERIS AFFINIS, sp. nov. (Plate vii., Fig. 1.) Pie srOnun AS 11, 33-41 > P. toate 15. C.. 17; I: lat. 60-62; 1. tr. 7 + 19. Depth 23-24, head 34-34 in the length to the hypural. Eye 2-21 in the head; interorbital width 14- 12 in the eye and about twice as wide as the snout is long. Depth of caudal peduncle % of the eye. 1 Macleay—Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, ix., 1884, p. 21 46 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. Body rather deep; the profile arched to the first dorsal, thence straight to the tail. Lower profile forming an even curve to the origin of the anal, the base of which is very oblique. Interorbital space convex. Maxilla reaching to slightly behind the middle of the eye, and covered with large, rough ctenoid scales. Preoperculum with a very strong spine at the angle and one or two weaker ones on each border. Operculum with two very small flat points separated by a broad excavation ; above and close to the upper one are several small points which may be indistinct. Whole head, with the exception of the tip of the snout and the lips, covered with moderately large scales which are mostly cycloid, only those of the preorbital and lower portion of the head being ctenoid. Upper jaw with an outer row of large canines which increase in size as they approach the median toothless excavation; anteriorly there is an inner row of smaller teeth behind them. Lower jaw with a few large teeth directed outwards anteriorly, and two rows of smaller teeth along the sides which become united into one about half way back. A row of small conical teeth is present on each side of the vomer, and still smaller ones form bands on the palatines. Posterior gill-rakers long and slender, more than one-third the length of the eye; there are twenty-three on the lower limb of the first arch. On the back, in front of the dorsal fin, and also on the ventral surface, except on the bases of and between the ven- trals, the scales are extremely rough and ctenoid; their edges are turned obliquely outwards from the body, and they are firm and adherent. The rest of the body is covered with large, flat, cycloid scales which are only marked with very fine con- centric striz, and are very deciduous. ‘The lateral line is continued to the end of the middle caudal rays, and has 60-62 scales as far as the hypural and fifteen more to the end. The exposed portion of each scale is smooth and smaller than those on either side of it, and the edges are broken both above and below the canal by small rounded indentations. Origin of the dorsal well behind the vertical of the ventral spine; the distance between it and the end of the snout is slightly less than half that between the same point and the end of the middle caudal rays. The fifth spine is more than two-thirds the length of the second ray, which is equal to three-fourths or more of the length of the head. The base of the anal is 24 that of the dorsal, and its anterior rays are as long as the last dorsal spine; the first spine is placed below the last dorsal ray. Third pectoral ray the longest, reaching to above the fourth anal ray. Ventrals placed beneath the pectorals and reaching backwards to the vent. FISHES.—McCULLOCH. 47 Colour.—Body everywhere closely speckled with minute red- dish-brown dots which are more crowded on the back and head. Dorsal, caudal and ventrals tipped with black, while the anal also has a narrow black border. With the exception of these markings and some crowded dots on the anterior portion of the dorsal and on the caudal lobes, the fins are colourless. Described from four specimens 96-135 mm. long. Length of type (B. 7332) 135 mm. This species is very closely allied to P. multiradiata, but may be at once distinguished by its much smaller scales. It has also a somewhat different number of rays in the dorsal and anal fins, and the tail portion of the body is longer, while a good recognition character lies in the black tips to the fins. Three small specimens were taken by the ‘‘Endeavour’’ in thirteen fathoms off Nobby’s Head, Newcastle, New South Wales. A larger and somewhat better preserved example is in the Australian Museum collection from Port Jackson, and has been selected as the type. PEMPHERIS KLUNZINGERI, nom. nov. Pempheris miilleri, Klunzinger, Sitzb. Akad. Wiss. Wien., Ixxx., 1., 1879, p. 380, pl. vi. (nee P. miilleri, Poey, 1860). Both Macleay! and Waite? have suggested that this species is identical with P. compressa,3 Shaw, but it appears to be distinguished by its much more elongate form, somewhat larger number of anal rays and smaller scales. i have counted eight specimens of P. compressa and find the number of fin-rays and scales to be as follows :—D. vi./9-10, A. i./ 35-38, lateral line to the hypural, 62-64. Klunzinger gives for the same in his species:—D. v./1o0, A. 111./39-40, lateral line 75. he different forms of the two species may be seen by comparing Klunzinger’s figure with that of Stead of P. com- pressa.4 The type came from King George’s Sound. It was not obtained by the ‘‘Endeavour,’’ nor have I seen any specimens. PEMPHERIS ELONGATA, Sp. nov. (Plate iv., Big-er:) Detiveaves MO=nec A. lit. 24-27 ubeetietOs)V. i. 5. ©, 178 i jat68-71 3 | tr. .8-o.+ 18-20, /eheicht 3°1 to 2°7 in the length to the hypural. Profile slightly arched to the dorsal fin, thence straight to the tail; lower profile considerably more curved than the upper one. Caudal peduncle narrow, 13 1n the eye. i Macleay—Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, ix., 1884, p. 21. 2 Waite—Mem. Austr. Mus., iv., 1899, p. 74. 3 Shaw in White—Voy. N.S. Wales, 1790, p. 267, fig. 2. 4 Stead—Ed. Fish. N.S. Wales, 1908, p. 49, pl. xviii. 48 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. Head 2°8 to 3°1 in the length. Orbit 2°4 in the head, much greater than the interorbital width which is rather more than one-fourth of the head, convex, and one-third longer than the snout. Operculum with two very weak spines which are almost hidden by scales. With the exception of the snout and lips the whole head is covered with small scales set in a fleshy skin, beneath which are numerous muciferous canals with small pores opening onto the surface. Teeth minute, in a single row on the jaws and in very narrow bands or almost single rows on the vomer and palatines. Median portion of the scales of the body more or less pro- duced and usually with several microscopic points which are variable both in number and degree of development. There are from sixty-eight to seventy-one scales along the lateral line to the hypural and about ten more extend onto the base of the caudal; they are enlarged, those of the anterior portion being almost twice as broad as long, and have either truncate or excavate spiny margins. Below the lateral line the scales are arranged in oblique rows which descend backwards towards the lower surface of the body. The distance between the origin of the dorsal and the end of the snout is usually somewhat less, sometimes rather more than half that between it and the tip of the caudal. The first spine may be either well developed, small or absent ; the others increase regularly in height, the last being about two-thirds the length of the first ray. The latter is simple and a little longer than the space between the end of the snout to the hinder orbital margin. The length of the base of the anal is 1°5 to 1°7 that of the dorsal; its anterior rays are much higher than the posterior ones, but are only two-thirds, or less, the length of the first dorsal ray. The first spine is placed either below the hindermost portion of the dorsal or entirely behind that fin and is often minute and hidden in the scales. Third upper ray of the pectoral the longest, reaching almost to or a little beyond the vertical of the anal. Ventrals placed below the pectorals and not reaching so far back as the vent. Colour.—Upper surface of the head, back and upper portion of the sides closely speckled with microscopic brown dots which give them a greyish colour. Breast, lower jaw and lips more or less similarly dotted, and the specks also extend onto the dorsal and caudal rays. Otherwise colourless in preserved examples. Described from sixteen specimens 90 to 132 mm. long, the longest of which is selected as the type. This species is allied to P. unwint, Ogilby, but is at once distinguished by its much less spiny and more numerous FISHES.—McCULLOCd. 49 scales. The dorsal and anal fins also have several more rays each, but otherwise the two are very similar. The specimens were trawled off Flinders Island, Bass Strait, in 40 fathoms, and off Wilson’s Promontory, Victoria. The following key will serve to distinguish the Australian species of Pempheris :— a. Anal fin with more than 30 rays; body rather deep. -b. Scales mostly cycloid, ctenoid anteriorly, deciduous. c. Scales large, 46-50 on lateral line (to the hypural) :— multiradiata. cc. Seales smaller, 60-62 on the lateral line:— = affints. bb. Scales ctenoid, adherent. d. 62-64 scales on the lateral line :— compressa. dd. 75 scales on the lateral line :— klunzingert. aa. Ana! fin with less than 30 rays, body rather elongate. e. Edges of the scales with minute, irregular points, though scarcely ctenoid :— elongata. Famity SERRANIDZE. GENUS EPINEPHELUS, Bloch. EPINEPHELUS SEPTEMFASCIATUS, Thunberg. Grey-banded Rock Cod. Plectropoma susuki, Giinther, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1867, p. 100. Epinephelus septemfasciatus, Boulenger, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., i.; 1895, p. 226; id., Waite, Mem. Austr. Mus., iv., 1899, p- 75; id., Jordan & Richardson, Proc. U.S. Nat. Mis. Xxxvile, 1g1O, p. 458. Jordan and Richardson have recently expressed the opinion that the Australian records of this species are probably in- correct. I have compared the specimen taken by the ‘‘Thetis,’’ another of unknown origin, and two in the ‘‘En- deavour’’ collection with the description given by these authors of Japanese specimens, and find that they differ in two small details only. None show the small patch of very ' fine scales near the tip of the maxillary, nor in any is the sixth band divided as described. Giinther stated, however, that the colouration of his Port Jackson specimens was as in that figured by Schlegel, so that, though I think it possible that the Australian fish represents a distinct subspecies, it is best to leave the matter open until examples from both localities can be compared. Two specimens trawled off the Clarence River, New South Wales, in 26-30 fathoms. 50 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. GENUS HYPOPLECTRODES, Gill. HyYPOPLECTRODES SEMICINCTA, Cuvier and Valenciennes. Half-banded Sea Perch. Gilbertia semicincta, Boulenger, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., 2nd eds, 12, 1895, p= 307- A single specimen was preserved from six miles off Port Stephens, New South Wales, 43 fathoms. Genus Anrtuias, Bloch. Anthias, Boulenger, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., 2nd ed., i., 1895, P3295 A careful examination of fourteen specimens of A. pulchel- lus, Waite, shows that the differences between this genus and Ce@sioperca are very slight. Comparing the definitions of the two, as given by Boulenger (loc. cit., pp. 311 and 320), tt appears that the only reliable differences between them are as follows :— Scales rough on the border, denticulated; tubes of the lateral line bifurcate, short. Dorsal with 19-23 rays. Anal with 9-10 rays :— Ce@sioperca. Scales ciliated, smooth. ‘Tubes straight or with an ascend- ing tubule and extending along nearly the entire scales. Dorsal with 14-18 rays. Anal with 6-8 rays :-— Anthias. In A. pulchellus I find the number of fin rays agrees with Anthias, while the characters of the scales are distinctly those of Cesioperca. In the fourteen specimens the number of fin- rays and scales is as follows:—D. x./16-17; A. i1./8; P. 15-16; 1. lat. 41-45. My colleague, Mr. E. F. Hallmann, very kindly pre- pared microscopical mounts for me of the scales of Anthias pleurStenia, Bleeker, A. pulchellus, Waite, C@sioperca rasor, Rich., and C. lepidoptera, Forster. In the first-named only are they smooth with ciliated edges. Those of the other three have their borders roughened for varying distances. FIG. 12. within the ciliated edges. In none do I find the tubes of the lateral line bifurcate, as stated by Boulenger, though they extend further across the scales in A. pleurotenia than in the others. FISHES.—McCULLOCH. 51 It follows, therefore, that if 4. pulchellus be admitted as a true Anthias, the differences in the number of fin-rays alone can be used to distinguish C@sioperca from that genus. ANTHIAS PULCHELLUS, Waite. (Fig. 12.) Anthias pulchellus, Waite, Mem. Austr. Mus., iv., 1899, De yi7 ple xi. Of eleven specimens preserved only three bear the black spot on the dorsal fin. They were obtained off Norah Head, New South Wales, in 65 fathoms, and 60 miles south of Cape Everard, Victoria, 60-70 fathoms. GENUS CALLANTHIAS, Lowe. CALLANTHIAS ALLPORTI, Giinther. Allport’s Perch. Callanthias allporti, Gunther, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (4), xvil., 1876, p. 390; id., Boulenger, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., 2nd edu 1595, Pp. 3395, pl: xv sv7demvatte, Prelio. Rept: /hetis Exped.) 1808, p. 31; plesu: Callanthias platei, Boulenger, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (7), i., 1899, p- 346; id., Waite, Mem. Austr. Mus., iv., 1899, Peconguds, su1d. wee: Austr. Musee, 1903, p.56 (nec C. platei, Steindachner). Callanthias platei australis, Ogilby, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, xxiv., 1699, p. 173. In 1898 Waite (Prelim. Rept. ‘‘Thetis’’) recorded six speci- mens from the New South Wales coast as C. allporti, Gunther, but noted that they did not wholly agree with the published descriptions of that species. Boulenger (Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist.), with Gunther’s type before him, considered that Waite’s figure represented a distinct species and identified it with C. platei, Steindachner,! which had just been described from Juan Fernandez. Later, Ogilby? (Proc:, Linn. Soe: N.S.W.), noting certain differences between Steindachner’s. figure and the Australian fish, proposed to separate the latter under the varietal name australis, but this name was not adopted by Waite, who referred to it simply as C. plate (Mem. Austr. Mus., iv., and Rec. Austr. Mus., v.). With twenty-three specimens taken by the ‘‘Endeavour’’ and four others in the museum collection before me, I find that the ‘‘Thetis’’ specimens were correctly identified as C. allporti, and that C. platei australis is merely the young form 1 Steindachner—Faun. Chilensis, Zool. Jahrb., Suppl., iv., 2, 1898, p. 284,. pl. xv. 52 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS of that species. C. allporti varies greatly with age both in the depth of the body and height of the vertical fins, so that Waite’s figure represents the half-grown fish about 200 mm. long, while that in the British Museum Catalogue is the figure of an adult specimen. Though closely approaching the figure of C. platei in its younger stages, C. allporti nevertheless appears to be dis- tinguished by its larger eye and higher vertical fins. The other characters used by Ogilby to differentiate the variety australis are dealt with below. My series includes specimens from less than five inches to others over eleven inches long, and they show that the body is much more slender in young individuals than in adults. The greatest depth in the smallest specimen is 3°21 in the length from the snout to the hypural, and it regularly increases with age until in the largest it is 2°66 in the same. The height of the vertical fins also varies with age, as well as individually. In the smallest specimen the longest anal rays are 7°3 in the above length, while a large example has them 5°04 in the same. In none are they so short as in the figure of C. platei which shows them to be about 8°3 in that length. The length of the head varies from 3°88 (young) to 4°61 (adult) in the length from the snout to He hypural. In his comparison of C. platei with C. p. australis, Ogilby’s figures show the head to be much smaller in the first-named. My specimens, however, and a comparison of Steindachner’s and Waite’s illustrations show that this difference is not so great as is indicated. The eye of the young is larger than that of the adult, being 2°7 as against 3 in the length of the head. The eye of C. plateit is proportionately smaller. The maxillary generally extends to below the anterior margin of the pupil, but in one specimen reaches almost to the middle of the eve. Ogilby’s counting of the fins and scales agrees with mine. Ogilby has erected the genus Anogramma for C. allporti regarding the strength of the vomerine teeth to be of generic importance. I have large specimens agreeing in every other way with the figure of C. allporti in which ‘these are either small or absent, while others of the australis form have them well developed. Anogramma is therefore unnecessary. The *‘Endeavour”’ collection includes forty-three specimens, most of which come from off Flinders Island, Bass Strait. Six were preserved from eleven miles east of Rarrenjoey Head, New South Wales, 40 fathoms. FISHES.—McCULLOCH. 53 GENUS Casioperca, Castelnau. CBSIOPERCA RASOR, Richardson. Red Perch. Serranus rusor, Richardson, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1839, p- 95, and Trans. Zool. Soc., iii., 1849, p. 73, pl. iv., fig. 1. Anthias rasor, Gunther, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., i.) EOSO, D198; id., Macleay, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, v., 1881, Passed. johnston, Procamitay. ‘Soc. Lasm... 1882 (1883), p. 109; id., Lucas, Proc. Roy Soc. Vict., 2 ser., Itz, E890} p. 17. Cestoperca rasor, Castelnau, Proc. Zool. Soc. Vict., i., 1872, p- 49; id., Boulenger, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., 2nd ed., i., 1895, P- 313. Anthias rasor var. extensus, Klunzinger, Arch. fur. Nat., MGV. LO72.0p. 17. Anthias extensus, Klunzinger, Sitzb. Ak. Wiss. Wien, Ixxx . iP ape som pla te Cesioperca extensa, Boulenger, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., 2nd Sdi i fS95 4p 33. The **Endeavour’’ specimens show that the colour marking's of this species are subject to great variation. The black mark on the side may be large or only moderately developed, or altogether absent. One specimen shows a large black spot on one side and none on the other, while in a second example it covers fifteen scales on the left side and two on the right. The blue bands around the eye and on the body are well developed in some and wanting in others. Having counted fifteen specimens I find the number of scales and fin-rays to be as follows :—D. x.-xi./19-22; A. iti./9-10; P. 14-15; V. 13/53 G-\053 lolat. 49-55. In separating his Anthias extensus from A. rasor, Klunzinger considered that it had a more slender body, longer pectorals, smooth preorbital, and lacked the characteristic markings of Richardson’s species. The above notes prove that the latter character has no specific value, while Boulenger shows that the length of the pectorals does not differ in the two. Castel- nau described the preorbital as strongly ciliated, but in all my specimens it is either entire or somewhat crenulate, and therefore agrees with both Klunzinger’s and Richardson’s figures. I find that the depth of the body varies from 2°75 to 3°0 in the length to the hypural, so that but one character, the smaller scales, is left to distinguish extensus. Klunzinger counted 62-63 scales on the lateral line, but it seems that he included some unperforated ones on the base of the tail, as. his figure, which is by that most accurate artist, Konopicky, shows only 58. 54 ‘ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. Having disposed of these apparent differences I have ne hesitation in following Macleay! in uniting the two species. The ‘‘Endeavour”’ collection includes fifteen specimens from the following stations :— Off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait, 4o fathoms. Oyster Bay, Vasmania. Forty miles west of Kingston, South Australia, 30 fathoms. Flinders Island, Investigator Group, South Australia, 37 fathoms. Five others are in the Australian Museum from Tasmania and South Australia. C4:SIOPERCA LEPIDOPTERA, Forster. Bastard Longfin. Cesioperca lepidoptera (Forster), Boulenger, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., 2nd ed:, i1., 1895, pagr2sad., Waite, Prelim: Rept ' Thetis:) Exped., .8o8jageaaaaplat- Though a large black spot on each side below the lateral line is characteristic of this species, yet some specimens in the collection show that it may occasionally be absent. Others also are marked with many small greenish spots which some- times form short, irregular lines, and may be so crowded on the upper parts as to darken them considerably, while still others show three yellow longitudinal bands along the sides below the lateral line. Twenty-two specimens were examined from the following localities :— Shoalhaven Bight, New South Wales, 15-45 fathoms, Off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait, 4o fathoms. Oyster Bay, Tasmania, 40-60 fathoms. Flinders Island, Investigator Group, South Australia, 37 fathoms. GENUS EnopLosus, Lacépede ENOPLOSUS ARMATUS, Shaw. Old Wife, Bastard Dorey, Zebra Fish. Chetodon armatus, Shaw in White, Voy. N.S. Wales, 1790, Pp. 254, fig. 1. Specimens of this widely distributed species were preserved from off the Clarence River, New South Wales, 26-30 fathoms, Shoalhaven Bight, New South Wales, 15-45 fathoms, and off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait, 40 fathoms. == 1 Macleay—Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, ix., 1884, p. 4. FISHES.—McCULLOCH. Ut on Famity APOGONICHTHYIDA:. GENUS ApoGonops, Ogilby. Apogonops, Ogilby, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, xxi., 1896, p- 23 (anomalus). Ogilby’s definition of this genus requires amendment and correction. Studying his type specimen I find that whereas he saw no supplemental bone to the maxillary there 1s really a very distinct bone lying along the upper and inner margin of the maxillary. “He writes, also, ‘‘vomer, palatines and tongue edentulous ;’’ both the first-named bear very minute teeth, and there are also some larger ones intermingled with the others on the vomer. ‘The teeth on the jaws are as described in the type, but in large examples they are as described below. Instead of ‘‘a single dorsal fin, deeply notched,’’ there are two dorsals separated by a short inter- space. No scales remain on any part of the body but the lateral line in the type, but in one of the specimens taken by the ‘‘Thetis’’ Expedition there are some on the upper portion of the head, body and base of the tail. Ogilby has stated that they are cycloid and concentrically striated. This applies to the head scales only, they being distinctly ctenoid everywhere else. All these characters are much more easily detected in my largest specimens, 122 mm. long, than in the type which ts only 54 mm. long, and, considering the care which Mr. Ogilby usually lavished on his descriptions, the differences detected are doubtless due to the want of sufficient microscopical appliances on his part. Apogonops is apparently closely allied to Synagrops, Gun- ther, but is distinguished by having three instead of only two anal spines. APOGONOPS ANOMALUS, Ogilby. (Fig. 133) Apogonops anomalus, Ogilby, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, xxi., 1896, p. 24; id., Waite, Mem. Austr. Mus., iv., ROO, P2774, Plosxi-, fig. I- Doi ao Ae a..7 3 -P. 13 ae, RoC. 175 1 lat: 46-50 to hypural. Head 22-34%, depth 4,4, in the length to the hypural. Eye 3-34 in the head, jonger than the snout which is 32. Interorbital space 44. Caudal peduncle 23-23, as long as broad, its depth equal to the length of the eye. Body elongate-oblong, tapering posteriorly, compressed. Head large, some of the bones covered with membrane enclosing canals beneath it. Mouth oblique, maxillary reach- 56 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFiC RESULTS. ing to or not so far as the middle of the eye, its posterior border slightly emarginate ; supplemental bone distinct, lying along the upper margin of the maxillary and turned in towards its inner side. Preorbital entire. Preoperculum with two borders, the inner entire, the outer serrated at and near the angle which is a little produced; short ridges extend from each tooth across the bone. Operculum with two spines, the lower a little longer than the upper. Suprascapular rounded, with a dentate margin, and a ridge on its lower portion extending forwards. Nostrils situated on the hinder half of the snout, almost equal in size, the anterior with a skinny margin. Teeth in villiform bands on the jaws, vomer and palatines, with scarcely any larger ones in the young. In the adult the premaxillaries bear crowded villiform teeth along their whole length, and have a pair of large curved fangs near their symphyses which may be double. Between these bones there is a median excavation which is toothless. Mandible with a narrow band of villiform teeth which is widest anteriorly. A strong pair of canines, corresponding to but smaller than those of the upper jaw, in front; on either side large curved teeth occur among the others which increase in size as they extend backwards, and terminate about half way along the length of the jaw. These larger teeth are variable in size and number in different specimens. Vomer with two diverging bands of minute teeth, among which are some larger ones. Palatines each with a long, narrow band of minute villiform teeth. Gill- rakers of first arch long and slender, the hinder ones more than half as long as the eye and each with the inner margin minutely denticulated ; 21-22 on the lower limb. FIG. 13. Scales very deciduous, those of the upper part of the head, preorbital and mandible rounded, concentrically striated and cycloid. They also appear to have been present on the cheeks. FISHES.—McCULLOCH. 57 and operculum. On the body they are similarly rounded and: striated, but ctenoid; those of the lateral line have a deep notch in their posterior margins. The scales extend onto the fleshy bases of the dorsal and anal fins and onto the caudal. Lateral line almost straight and extending onto the scaly base: of the caudal. First dorsal fin originating over or a little behind the base of the pectorals; the third and fourth spines are subequal, 2 or almost half as long as the head. The ninth spine is the shortest and 1s separated from the second dorsal by an inter- space a little longer than its own length. Spine of the second! dorsal slightly less than half as long as the rays, which are about equal to the length of the longest spines. Anal com- mencing below the third or fourth dorsal ray; the first spine is short and stout, the second shorter than but usually much stronger than the third which is but little shorter than the rays. Ventrals placed below the anterior part of the base of the pectoral and not nearly reaching to the vent; the spine is about two thirds the length of the second ray which is the longest. Pectorals very long, 2-2 as long as the head, the upper ray rather longer than the others. Colour.—Brownish or greyish above, lighter below ; oper- culum, thorax and abdomen silvery. A series of about five dark blotches along the sides which are less distinct or absent in large specimens. Two darker patches on the scaly portion of the tail. Upper portion of the dorsal fin with a blackish patch between the second and fifth spines. Described from two specimens, 54 and 122 mm. long, the smaller one being the type of the species. Fin formula and lateral line counted in nineteen specimens. Forty-three specimens were preserved from the following localities :— Between Port Setphens and Newcastle, New South Wales, 22-60 fathoms. Twenty-five miles south-west of Cape Everard, Victoria, 83-98 fathoms. Thirty-six miles off Cape Everard, Victoria, 75 fathoms. Famity AMBASSID-A. GENUS Priopis, Kuhl and Van Hasselt. PRIOPIS RAMSAYI, Macleay, (Plate xvi.. figs) Pseudoambassis ramsayi, Macleay, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales 188n;%p. 340. Ambassis vamsayi, Ogilby, Cat. Fish. N.S. Wales, 1886, Podl4. 38 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. Chanda ramsayi, Waite, Mem. N S. Wales Nat. Cluh, No. 2, 1904, p. 29. Ambassis gymnocephalus, Ramsay and Ogilby, Proc. Linn. Soc. N:S. Wales, i. (2), 1887, p. 1102. (Perhaps not Az gymnocephalus (Lacépéde) Bleeker. ) Abasassis, sp., Ogilby, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, iii. (2), 1889, p. 1550. Chanda gymnocephalus, Waite, Mem. N.S. Wales Nat. Club, No. 2, 1904, p. 29. D, Wis-vaeore-1.10'; A. ate eam iP ona SV Sac aaa sc. lat. 25-26; sc. tr. 3 + 7. Depth nearly 24, head 3} in the length to the hypural. Eye 23-3, orbit 24 in the head, and twice as long as the snout. Interorbital width 14 in the orbit. ‘Caudal peduncle 2 in the head. Body rather deep, compressed. Upper anterior profile interrupted over the eye, the back between the nape and the dorsal more or less keeled. Supraorbital ridge smooth anteriorly, armed with three to five spines on its posterior portion which is bent downwards. — Antero-inferior orbital ring crenulate or spinulate. Preorbital strongly denticulate. Lower limbs of preoperculum denticulated, all the other bones smooth. Maxillary reaching to below the anterior margin of the eve. Two rows of scales on the cheeks, one behind the eve; operculum with large irregular scales, a single row on the interoperculum. Minute teeth on the jaws, vomer, palatines and tongue. Gill-rakers flattened, spinulate on their inner edges, the longest about half as long as the eye. Scales of the body extending forwards to above the middle of the eye and onto the bases of the dorsal, anal and caudal fins. Lateral line interrupted below the spine of the second dorsal or farther forward, each scale with its free margin notched. There are ten to thirteen scales on the first portion which is arched, and twelve to fourteen on the straight -portion. Origin of the first dorsal a little nearer the end of the second than the tip of the snout. The first spine short, the second strong and subequal to the third and 1+ to 14 in the ‘head; the last is joined to the second dorsal by Peers es Spine of the second dorsal two-thirds as long as those of the first, shorter than the anterior rays. Anal commencing and ‘terminating behind the second dorsal, its base either slightly longer or shorter than that fin; the first.spine short, the second and third long and stout, the last as long as the rays but -shorter than the second dorsal spines. Pectorals almost reaching the vertical of the first anal spines. Ventrals reach- ‘ing to or slightly beyond the vent which is placed well in -advance of the anal fin. Caudal deeply forked. FISHES.—McCULLOCH. rs 59 Colour.—Whitish, the scales of the upper portion of the body margined with olive-green dots. A thin dark line on the median line of the tail, and a silvery lateral band in specimens in spirits. Upper portion of the head, lips and lower jaw densely spotted with olive-green. Membrane between the second and third dorsal spines blackish, and the tips of the soft dorsal and anal are darker. Caudal more or less spotted, its margin darker. Described from two specimens, 80 and 88 mm. long, recently collected in a prawn net at San Souci, Botany Bay, by Mr. J. H. Wright, and presented by him to the Australian Museum. ‘Two very imperfect specimens are in the ‘‘Endea- vour’’ collection which were taken near Sydney. I have examined the type of Pseudoambassis ramsayi in the Macleay Museum. It is very shrivelled and has lost many of its scales, but leaves no doubt that the specimens described above are correctly identified. I have also examined the specimens from the Parramatta River, identified by Ramsay and Ogilby as A. gymnocephalus, and find them to be identical with Macleay’s species, though whether they are really gymnocephalus also I am unable to say. They appear, how- ever, to have a much deeper body and less slender caudal peduncle than that species. Famity SILLAGINIDA. References to the Australian species of this family are in an extremely confused state. I have endeavoured to sort some of them into the order I believe they should be, and furnish a key which is drawn up principally from an examination of a number of specimens of each species :— a. Dorsal fins united, the first with 12-14 spines. Scales in about 130 rows :— ISOSILLAGO. b. D. xii.-xiv., 25-27; A. 24-25._ Body with small dark SOOUS S— _ punctata. aa. Dorsal fins separate, the first with 10-12 spines. Scales in 65-75 rows :— SILLAGO. c. A conspicuous dark mark at the base of the pectoral. d. Caudal peduncle as broad as the postorbital portion of the head. G2 Dexa TOs A.) 7-18 eateO3-OS) > — ciliata. dd. Caudal peduncle narrower than the postorbital por- tion of the head. js xd--Kil., 20-21 peepee ls lal. 070-71 e— maculata. 60 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS cc. No black mark on the base of the pectoral. g. Ventrals placed below the origin of the first dorsal. hn. D.-xi., 18; Ae0zo0; 1. lat. 65 :— robusta: gg. Ventrals placed in advance of the origin of the dorsal. 1. D. x= 3-20; A.. 20-22 Jijelat 66-68 :— bassensts. i. D. Sipeeera2e WAL To-21-" a ela 69-74 :— bostockit. m. D. xigpeeees: A. 24-2521. lat aoe sthama., Neosillago marmorata, Castelnau,! having only five spines. in the first dorsal, is evidently not a member of this family, but possibly belongs to the Nototheniide. Having had the opportunity of examining the types of Isosillago maculata, Macleay,2 I find that the number of spines and rays in the dorsal and anal fins are incorrectly stated in the original desc ription. ‘There are thirteen spines. in the first dorsal and one spine and twenty-four or five rays. in the second; the anal has twenty-four spines and rays in all. In these and all other characters they agree with Sillago punctata, Cuv. & Val., but may very well form the type of a distinct genus Isosillago, characterised by the union of the two dorsals, larger number of spines in the first, and by having very small scales. I am unable to find any specimens marked as the types of Sillago gracilis, Alleyne and Macleay, in the Macleay Museum, but there are two small specimens labelled ‘‘Sillago sp? Torres Straits,’’ which I have no doubt are the types. Through the kindness of Professor Haswell and Professor David, I have been allowed to borrow them for examination. Oneé is a little larger than the other, and from the snout to the: end of its broken tail is almost 82 mm. long, which is exactly the: length of the figure of S. gracilis. In other details also, such as the form of the damaged tail and the pronounced shrinkage: marks on the head, it agrees perfectly with the figure, though it has lost all trace of the colour markings with the exception of the silvery lateral band. Both differ from the description in the number of fin-rays in the dorsal and anal, there being. only one spine and twenty rays in each instead of one, twenty- 1 Castelnau—Res. Fish. Austr. (Vict. Rec. Philad. Exhib.) Fe D.ui6: 2 Macleay—Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, iii., 1878, p. 34, Si Pesto 3 ete and Macleay—Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, i., = p. 279, ple vis. pegs FISHES. MCCULLOCH. 61 two as stated. I regard this of little importance, however, since Macleay also counted the same fins wrongly in his much larger specimens of Isosillago maculata, as noted above. If these two specimens be regarded as the types of S. gracilis, that species must be sunk as a synonym of S. macu- lata, Q. & G., as both the specimens and the figure agree well with that species. GENUS SILLAGO, Cuvier. SILLAGO BASSENSIS, Cuvier and Valenciennes. Bass Whiting, School Whiting. Sillago bassensis, Cuvier & Valenciennes, Hist. Nat. Poiss., ti ro2Q, Pp. 412), 1d., Ogilby, aides Hish) N:S. sWales, 1893, pp. 99, LOU, 102; id., Waitesikec., Austr. Mus.,1v:, 1902, p. 190;-id7, Stead, Proc.) imny soc. N.S! Wales, KxXx., 1906, p. 574, and Ed: Bisha)N:S:Wales, 1908, pei ©5, Plan XHXV. Sillago maculata, Castelnau, Proc. Zool. Soc. Vict., i., 1872, p- 94; id., Johnston, Proc. Roy. Soc. Tasm., 1882 (1883), peerto7ds. lucas Proc. Roysgseesiwict. (nese), i., 1890, p. 26 (after Castelnau); 1d., Waite, Mem. Austr. Miss, Iv., 11899) sp: 109; (nec: Siamacuiatas O: & G.). Sillago ciliata, Johnston, Proc. Roy. Soc. Tasm., 1882 (1883), pp. 80, 116 (nec S. ciliata, Cuv. & Val.). Many specimens of this common southern species were preserved. I have counted the fin-rays and scales of forty specimens from New South Wales, Victoria, Tasmania, South Australia and West Australia and find them to be as follows: —D. x.-xi./18-20; A. 20-22; |. lat. 66-68. The ‘‘Endeavour’’ specimens were taken at the following stations :— Off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait. Off the mouth of the Murray River, South Australia, 20 fathoms. South-east of Flinders Island, Investigator Group, South Australia, 37 fathoms. SILLAGO MACULATA, Quoy and Gaimard. Trumpeter Whiting. Sillago maculata, Quoy & Gaimard, Voy. ‘‘Uranie,’’ 1824, p: 260, pilin, fic. 2; id., Guntheg brit. Mus. Cat. Fish: , ii.,, 1860, p. 1245 (part.); id=, Steindachner, Sitzb. Ak. Wiss. Wien., liii., p. 444; 1d., Alleyne & Macleay, Proc. Ein Soc. N.S: Wales, i., 187%, .p. 279; id:, Castelnau, 62 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, iii., 1879, pp. 380-381 ; id., Klunzinger,, Sitzb., Ale: Wise Wien:, lxxx!aonipe e708 id... Macleay,. Proc. Linn. ‘Soe.. N.S. Wales, v., 18x, p. 566; 1d.. Woods, Fish. N.S. Wales, 1882, p. 65, pl. xxi. ; id., Ogilby, Cat. Kish) N.S. Wales, 1886, p: 31; id. Kent, 3Gt. Barrier Ree 1593, pp. 2023, 3705 ade. Ogilby, Ed. Fish. N.S: Wales, 1893, p. 1o1 (pant je id... “Waite, Rec. Austr: Miss, iv-, 1902, pp. 190; Tom: id., Waite, Mem. N.S. Wales Nat. Club, No. 2, 1904, ps 305 ad., Stead, Ed BishagN Ss. Wales, 1908. p: 64, pl. xxcxiv- Sillago burrus, Richardson, Icones Piscium, 1843, p. 5, pl. il.,. fe. 1540.3, Castelnau; ,Proemlimn. Soc. N.S. Walesa. 1878, p: (232. Sillago gracilis, Alleyne & Macleay, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wreales 5.8877, Pp. 279, 9plemie, He. 2. These are all the Australian references I know of which can be definitely associated with this species. I have examined specimens from the neighbourhood of Sydney, the Gulf of Carpentaria and Fremantle, West Australia. SILLAGO CILIATA, Cuvier and Valenciennes. Sand |Whiting. Sillago ciliata, Cuvier & Valenciennes, Hist. Nat. Poiss., til.,. 7820, p» 415; id.; Gunther, Brit) Mus. Cat. Fish. 7 ur, 1860, p. 245; id., Steindachner, Sitzb. Ak. Wiss. Wien... liii., 1866, p. 443; id., Kner, Reise Novara, Fische, 1869, p. 127; 4d., All. & Mael.eErec. Emn. Soc. N.S. Wales, i., 1877, p. 279; id., Klunzinger, Sitzb. Ak. Wiss. Wien, Ixxx. 1., 1879, p.-369;.%d., Macleay, Proc. Linn. Soe. N.S. Wales, v:, 1881; pesso74 2d: Woods, Fish: NES: Wales, 1882, p. 65, pli xm; id., Ogilby, Cat. Kishk: N.S. Wales, 1886, p. 31; 1d.. McCoy, Prodr. Zools) Wactas 1889, pl. clxxxil.; id., Kent, Gt. Barrier Reef, 1893, pp. 292 and 370, pl. xlv., fig. 2; id., Ogilby, Ed. Fish. N.S. Wales, 1893, p. 102, pl. xxvil.; id., Waite, Rec. Austr- Mus.s ive" 1991, _p-- 475m, Waite, Mem. N.S. Wales. Nat. Club, No. 2, 1904, p. 31; 1d., Jordan & Seale, Bull. US: *Bur.. Bish... xxv, BOOS s019e6), \p- 2775 12-,.01ead, Ed. Fish. N.S. Wales, 1908, p. 63, pl. xxxiil. Sillago terre-regine, Castelnau, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, li, O79) 0p-. 232. Sillago bassensis, Castelnau, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, iii., 1879, p. 381; id., Macleay, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, v., 1881, p. 567; id., Kent, Gt. Barrier Reef, 1893, p. 291; id., Tosh, Proc. Roy. Soc. Olds, xvi. , 1903. p. 175, pls. vili-xiv. (nec. S. bassensis, C. & V.). FISHES.—McCULLOCH. 63: This species occurs all along the eastern coast of Australia, and has been recerded from Cape York to Port Phillip. A specimen in the British Museum is said to be from Tasmania. The specimens recorded by Castelnau from Fremantle dis- trict, West Australia, as S. ciliata! are not that species. The Australian Museum has recently received some fine examples from the same locality, from Mr. A. Abjornssen, which differ from S. ciliata in having smaller scales, a much narrower caudal peduncle, more rays in the dorsal and anal fins, and in lacking the characteristic dark mark at the base of the pectorals. They are evidently identical with Castelnau’s specimens and must, therefore, receive the alternative name, bostockii, which he proposed in case they should prove distinct from the eastern species. Famity SCIAZAENIDZ. GENUS CyNOSCION, Gill. CYNOSCION ATELODUS, Giinther. Teraglin. Otolithus atelodus, Ogilby, Ed. Fish. N.S. Wales, 1893, Dass: Pla xi, Cynoscion atelodus, Stead, Ed. Fish. N.S. Wales, 1908, p. 67, pl xxxvilr. Three examples of this species, each about a foot long, were taken fifteen miles off Saddle Hill, New South Wales, in 35 fathoms. Famity GERRIDZE. GENUS CHTHAMALOPTERYX, Ogziby. CHTHAMALOPTERYX MELBOURNENSIS, Castelnau. Gerres melbournensis, Castelnau, Proc. Zool. Soc. Vict., 1., 1872, p. 158, and i1., 1873, Pp. 37- Chthamalopteryx melbournensis, Ogilby, Proc. Zool. Soc. 1887, p. 6106, fig. The ‘‘Endeavour’’ collection includes many specimens of this species which were taken at the following stations :— Off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait, 40 fathoms. Off the mouth of the Murray River, South Australia,, 20 fathoms. Forty miles west of Kingston, South Australia, 30 fathoms. Spencer Gulf, South Australia, 20 fathoms. South-east of Flinders Island, Investigator Group, South Australia, 37 fathoms. 1 Castelnau—Proe. Zool. Soc. Vict., il., 1873, p. 133. 4 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. Famity CHEILODACTYLIDZ. GENUS GONIISTIUS, Gill. GONIISTIUS VIZONARIUS, Went. Magpie Perch. (Plate xi.) Cheilodactylus gibbosus, Castelnau, Proc. Zool. Soc. Vict., i, 1972, p75; id., Johnsteal {Proc.. Roy...Soc. Masme 1882.(1883), p. 112; id., Incas, Proc. Roy. Soc: Micts, (n.4 Sen); /11.,- 1890, . p. (2m elaiter *Castelnan) (nec G gibbosus, Richardson). Chilodactylus vizonarius, Kent, Proc. Roy. Soc. Tasm., 1887, pp. xxx., xxxi. and 48; id., Johnston, Proc. Roy. Soc. Pasmin tego (1891); pr. ie ‘Chilodactylus bizonarius, Kent, Naturalist in Austr., 1897, Pp. 165,) 106} (pl. xxviils, silos: 1D: Seviti;,; 25-285 A. ilt.;, Tommie + Os Vo 53 Caer Jl. lat. 65-68. Height of the body 2°6 to 2°8, length of the head 3°50 to 3°66 in the length to the hypural. Snout much longer than the diameter of the eve which is 4°2 to 4°8 in the head. Nostrils large, close together, the anterior with two skinny lobes. Mouth rather small, the maxillary reaching to below the posterior nostril. A band of villiform teeth in each jaw; vomer, palatines and tongue toothless. Phere is 4 larse conical projection in front of each eye, extending slightly outwards and upwards. First dorsal originating a little behind the vertical of the preoperculum, the fifth spine generally the longest, and either equal to the distance from the snout to the preoperculum or considerably shorter. Anterior rays subequal in length, gradually decreasing backwards, the longest somewhat longer than the snout. Third anal spine longer than the second; the second ray the longest and equal to the length from the snout to the preoperculum. The simple rays of the pectoral are very variable in their relative lengths; the second !s alwavs the longest and reaches either to the origin or middle -of the anal fin. Ventral spine slender, generally equal to the fourth dorsal spine in length; the first ray reaches to, or almost to the vent. Caudal deeply forked. . Scales large anteriorly, becoming smaller behind. They form a sheath to the bases of the dorsal and anal fins. On the head they are very small and extend forwards to the -anterior margin of the eyes above and to the maxillary below, leaving the snout bare. They are very small on the breast FISHES.—MCCULLOCH. 65 also, and on a narrow band which extends backwards to the ventrals. Lateral line feebly arched, its course directed to the upper part of the caudal peduncle, whence it extends onto the » base of the tail. Colour.—Silvery, the scales with or without darker margins. A broad black band occupies the space between the fifth and thirteenth dorsal spines and extends to the ventrals, narrowing considerably as it approaches them. A_ second similar band extends from the soft dorsal to the anal, while there is another less distinct one enveloping the anterior por- tion of the head and defined posteriorly by a line descending from the nape, behind the eye to the throat. These two last bands are usually not so well defined as the first, and may be altogether absent. Pectorals, ventrals and anal blackish; dorsals and caudal light or dusky, the dark bands of the body sometimes continued onto the former. Described from six specimens, the largest being 380 mm. long. This species is so far recorded from Tasmania and Victoria only, but there is a specimen in the Australian Museum from Adelaide. Castelnau confused it with Cheilodactylus gibbosus, Richardson, and as such recorded it first from Hobson’s Bay and later from Port Jackson.1 The Victorian record un- doubtedly refers to G. vizonarius, while the second is based on the true G. gibbosus which is occasionally seen around piles, etc., in Port Jackson in small numbers. This species is undoubtedly a member of the same genus as the Cheilodactylus vittatus, Garrett, described and figured by Jordan and Evermann.? but whether this really belongs to Lacépéde’s genus is doubtful. I therefore place vizonarius in Goniistius, to which genus Waite referred G. vittatus.§ The specimens preserved in the ‘‘Endeavour’’ collections came from Anderson Bay, Tasmania, 14 fathoms, and off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait. GENUS DACTYLOSPARUS, Gill. Dactylosparus, Gill, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philad., 1862 (car- ponemus, Cuv. & Val.). This genus appears to be distinguished from Cheilodactylus, Lacépéde, chiefly in having the anal fin oblong and nearly uniformly high instead of short and highest anteriorly. 1 Castelnau—Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, iii., 1879, pp. 351, 363. 2 Jordan & Evermann—Bull. U.S. Fish. Comm., xxiii., pt. 1, 1903 ‘1905)_ p. 447, pl. liv. 3 Waite—Rec. Austr. Mus., iv.. 1902, p. 185. 66 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. DACTYLOSPARUS CARPONEMUS, Cuvier and Valenciennes. Morwong. Chilodactylus carponemus (Cuvier and Valenciennes), Ogilby, Ed. Fish. N.S. Wales, 18035) p2955, pl. xvili. The collection includes six young examples, 125-145 mm. long, which have much deeper bodies than adult specimens, and are marked with a round dark spot on the lateral line below the posterior part of the spinous dorsal. They were obtained off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait, and between Port Stephens and Newcastle, New South Wales, 22-60 fathoms. DACTYLOSPARUS MACROPTERUS, Forster. Jackass Fish, Silver Perch, Terakiht. (Piate xii.) Chilodactylus macropterus (Forster), Ogilby, Ed. Fish. N.S. Wales, 1893, p. 57. This common species is represented from the following localities :— Off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait. Off the mouth of the Murray River, South Australia, 20 fathoms. Forty miles west of Kingston,.South Australia, 30 fathoms. Famity TERAPONID. Genus HELOTES, Cuvier. HELOTES SEXLINEATUS, Quoy and Gaimard. Butter Fish. Terapon sexlineatus, Quoy and Gaimard, Voy. ‘‘Uranie,”’ 182A) p. 340, pl. Ix., fea Two specimens of this species were secured in the Mel- bourne market by Mr. Dannevig, which probably came from South Australia. They were called Butter-fish by the fisher- men. Famity MA‘NID/E. Genus EmMELICcHTHYS, Richardson. EMMELICHTHYS NiTIDUS, Richardson. Emmelichthys nitidus, Richardson, Zool. Ereb. & Terr., Fishes, 1845, p- 47, pl. xxix., figs. 7-8. Two small specimens were obtained thirty-six miles off Cape Everard, Victoria, in 75 fathoms. It is probable that they FISHES.—McCULLOCH. 67 entered the net as it neared the surface, since the species has been taken in a surface net, swimming with pilchards and mackerels.! This fish has been recorded from West Australia, Tasmania, New South Wales and New Zealand. Famity HISTIOPTERIDZ. GENUS ZANCLISTIUS, Jordan. Zanclistius, jordan, Proc. U:S:5 Nat. Mus., KKK LOOT, p. 236 (elevatus). Anal spines three; soft dorsal very high, usually falcate, with about twenty-six rays. ZANCLISTIUS ELEVATUS, Ramsay and Ogilby. Short Boar Fish. (Figs. 14-18.) Histiopterus elevatus, Ramsay and Ogilby, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales (2), iii., 1888, p. 1311; id., Waite, Mem. Austr. Mus., iv., 1899, p. 114, pl. xxvi. Zanclistius elevatus, Waite, Proc. N. Zealand Inst., pt. 1, 1910, p. 25, and Rec. Cantb. Mus., if, TODINps 210;; td, Kershaw, Vict. Nat. xxvill., 1911, p. 93- Fifty-two specimens, of all sizes between 75 and 300 mm. long, exhibit a remarkable range of variation in certain of the characters that are usually relied upon to differentiate the species of this family. That these are not due to either age or growth is adequately shown by this splendid series, while it is also clear that they cannot be entirely connected with sex. Figures 14-18 illustrate five selected variations, their relative sizes being shown by the inch-line accompanying each. The most striking variation is in the angle and form of the dorsal profile. In some specimens the line from the first dorsal spine to the base of the snout is almost straight, being broken only by a slight convexity over the eyes. In others it is an irregular arch interrupted by a large bony boss on the occipital region, and another smaller one over each eye. From these last the profile may extend obliquely forward so that the nostrils are placed nearly an eye-diameter in front of the anterior margin of the orbit, or it may follow the curvature of the eye so that they are only very little in front of the eye. The size of the eye is also subject to variation. 1 Stead—Add. Fish Faun. N.S. Wales, No. 1 (Dept. Fish. N.S.W.), 1907, job UG 68 “ENDEAVOUR” SOCIENTIFIO RESULTS. 2 BIG 4: t/} ) ij I FIG. 15. FISHES.-McCULLOCH. 69 Two very young specimens have the bones of the head more strongly ribbed than in the larger examples, and they bear some prominent flattened spines on the occiput and above the eyes. Smaller spines are found on the lower end of the pre- orbital and on the suprascapular, and the angle and adjacent borders of the preoperculum are armed with strong teeth. FIG. 16. The dorsal fin may originate over the preoperculum or as far back as the extremity of the operculum. The spines vary greatly in length and are either short and thick or long and slender. When laid back the longest rays may reach to Just beyond the base of the caudal or as far again. The third anal spine is either longer or shorter than the second, and the soft 70 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. portion of the fin may be rounded or else the anterior rays are much the longest. The ventral spine is placed below the middle of the pectoral in some specimens and well in advance of it in others. Notwithstanding the variable form and posi- tion of the fins, their numbers of rays and spines are fairly constant, and in twenty-five specimens I find them to be as ‘follows :—=D. vi./25-28, A. 1ii./i2-0eer. 14-160, V.1./5, C2 17- FIG. 17. A constant character is afforded by the black ocellus on the dorsal fin, it being present in all the ‘‘Endeavour’’ specimens. One very small example, 75 mm. long, is covered with large brown spots distributed evenly over the body and in no way correlated with the darker bands which appear in older specimens; others of the same size, however, show no such markiny. FISHES.—McCULLOCH. my The specimens came from the following stations :— Shoalhaven Bight, New South Wales, 15-45 fathoms. Disaster Bay, New South Wales. Off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait, 4o fathoms. North-west of Gree1.ly Island, South Australia, 44 fathoms. Flinders Island, Investigator Group, South Australia, 37 fathoms. GENUS PENTACEROPSIS, Steindachner. PENTACEROPSIS RECURVIROSTRIS, Richardson. Striped Boar Fish. Histiopterus recurvirostris, Richardson, Zool. Ereb. & Terr., Kishes,.0845,0p. 34, pl.; xxii) saitees5-6.71d.. Canestrini, Arch. Zoole Amat., i.. (2), p: W5euwale ii; 7d., Castelnau, Eroc Zool oocs,Vict., 1/, 1872 upmmogs ud.) Klunzinger, SitzapAke.WWiss..VWien., lxxx)megipe 376 wid., Johnston, Pree) Roy, Soe.. Lasm., .1882.(9883); ip: 110: 72 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. Prosoplismus recurvirostris, Waite, Rec. Austr. Mus., v., T903;40- 56, pl. vi. Pentaceropsis recurvirostris, Waite, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., “ii, (7), 1903, p. 288% abidsenee, Austr. Mus. va, 51905, corrigenda, p. xiii. ; sbid {leew cr... vi., 1905, p./625 41dq, Jordan, Proce’ U.S. Nat." Mussixxxil., 1907, p. 236. This species has been recorded from southern New South Wales, Victoria, Tasmania, South Australia and Fremantle, West Australia. Three specimens are included in the ‘‘En- deavour’’ collection which were trawled off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait. GENUS MACCULLOCHIA, Waite. Richardsonia, Castelnau, Proc. Zool. Acclim. Soc. Vict., 1., 1872, p. 112 (insignis =labiosa, not Richardsonia, Stein- dachner, 1866). Richardsonia, Jordan, Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., xxxiil., 1907, Dp. 236. Macullochia, Waite, Proc. N. Zealand Inst., pt. 1, 1910, p. 25 (labiosa), substitute for Richardsonia. Maccullochia, Waite, Rec. Cantb. Mus., 1., 1911, p. 217. Anal spines two. Dorsal spines seven, the fourth longest and very high; soft dorsal low and short, with about seventeen rays. MACCULLOCHIA LABIOSA, Giinther. Histiopterus labiosus, Gunther, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 658, pl. lix. Sad.; ‘Klunzinger, Sitz ak Wiss. Wien. , bxxx-ae. p. 376; id., Ogilby, Ed. Fish. and Crust. N.S. Wales, 1993; p- 29, pl. vii. Richardsonia insignis, Castelnau, Proc. Zool. Acclim. Soc. Wick ses, 1872) p.. bie: Histiopterus farnelli, Waite, Mem. Austr. Mus., 1v., 1899, Pp. £16, pl. xxvii. Macullochia labiosa, Waite, Proc. N. Zealand Inst., pt. 1, EQIO, Pp: 25. Eleven specimens, 170-380 mm. long, prove that H. farnelli, Waite, is the young of Gunther’s species. From the deep-bodied form, with striking dark coloursmarkings, this fish changes into an elongate and uniformly coloured adult. The largest specimen in the collection is especially interesting in that it is just intermediate between the two extremes. While having the general appearance of labrosus, it has the long spines and markings of farnelli, but these latter, instead of being uniformly black, are composed of brown reticulating FISHES.—McCULLOCH. =3 lines enclosing spots of the lighter ground colour. Mr. Waite has examined these specimens with me and agrees that they leave no doubt as to the identity of the two species. A point worthy of consideration is the difference noted by Waite in the number of scales on the lateral line as counted by Ogilby and himself. I find that the lateral line may either follow the curvature of the body in an even line or else pursue an undulatory and irregular course. Bearing this in mind, together with the difficulty of counting the scales of these fishes, the seeming discrepancy disappears. Shoalhaven Bight, New South Wales 15-45 fathoms. Disaster Bay, New South Wales. Off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait. Famity POMACENTRID#. GENUS CHROMIS, Cuvier. CHROMIS HYPSILEPIS, Gitinther. Brown Puller. (Plate xiv.) Heliastes hypsilepis, Giinther, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (3), xx., 1867, p. 66; id., Castelnau, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, ils, 1876, p. 388; td... Klunzmeem sSitzb. Ak. Wiss: Wiens ixxxs 12, 1570, p. 3983 td-aelacleay.. Eroc: Linn: Soc; NES; Wales, vi., 1881, pisgmesad.,. Ocilby, Mem. Austr. Mus., ii., 1889, p. 66. Brie nD piiin kaeae Ns 1... 1-3 3 2Onmuerte a Cosi 1 lat. ZO SCs 2:7 The height of the body is 24 to 24, the length of the head 3; to 34 in the length from the snout to the hypural. Eye 3 to 2%, caudal peduncle 2} in the head. Snout two-thirds as long as the eye. Body ovate, compressed, the dorsal profile a little more arched than the ventral, and evenly curved from the snout to the first dorsal spine. Margin of the preoperculum striated, but smooth. Operculum ending in a single flat spine which is almost hidden by scales. Preorbital not very broad, equal to about one-third of the eye at its narrowest part. Inter- orbital space strongly convex, equal to or somewhat wider than the eye. Nostril round, a little nearer the eye than the end of the snout. Maxillary reaching a little behind the anterior margin of the eye; mouth small, oblique. Teeth conical, acute and spaced, arranged in a band in front, but gradually changing into a single series on the sides, the outer teeth larger than the others. 74 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. Entire body and head, with the exception of the chin and the tip of the snout, covered with ciliated scales; on the upper parts of the head they are small and irregular, larger on the cheeks, and very large on the operculum and body. They extend about half-way up the vertical fins between the spines and rays, and there is a scaly sheath at the bases of the spinous dorsal and anterior part of the anal; small scales also cover the base and sides of the tail and basal portion of the pectoral. ) ~~ ba | Flinders Island, Investigator Group, South Australia, fathoms. ri ie, rn) " \ | i ‘ ‘ ra f 1 ty 7 EAs tft | fe j i Rae! t ! nil Pp i ® ii Hi} Pen? y i ; *. ul : j iit’ ea) ree | ren xf! fe Fy ile bias i ee } ' i nyt) b i { ft) t i i ‘a , Tat iu 1 1 TOR (V8 id H H 4 a io i ” I | 7 ‘s " yy : i f : “he a iT y : : a4 H t a : 1 a) Gi’ 9 ; %, 5a ; * : - ; ( i #, / y ‘ ' i eo 7 Agee 7 = ' l : j Wop ite > Sav One a senti ho eth agi inet: eae aaa a “HD Aol ee a: nee t ; ey? Parte ay a pr a Van he ‘ aT ; i ip ~ iy -\ ’ ‘ as ' " , fj J a7 : yy oe a i » a a ‘m wy bis rae Wins ( 7 ee ; te: t ‘ i i, Gr @ Bish {ye ve ip & by eA ri ts . iy a { : ! bie a 1 ; ve f r . 2 oe 4 — i a c j i! i 1 1 a f ct) 7 i iF yabbiars a ’ Wan i aA ) BA J i yi cas y rh aH iin re A dies “ie , wim af Vy , ihe ‘A \ j r, at Wy Hy - st Thy we a Ah : ae ut I]. Report on the Mollusca obtained by the F.I.S. ‘*Endea- vour,’’ chiefly off Cape Wiles, South Australia. PARA ele BY CHARLES HEDLEY, ASSISTANT CURATOR AND CONCHOLOGIST, Australian Museum, Sydney. (Plates XVII.-xX.) go “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. IREPORT ON DHE MOLLUSC: PaARGadle 1.— INTRODUCTION. Vhrough the kindness of the Hon. the Minister for Trade and Customs, the writer, in August and September, 1909, enjoyed an opportunity of accompanying the Director of Fisheries on a cruise of the Fishery Investigation Ship, ‘“Endeavour.’’ The voyage extended from Melbourne to the Nuyts Archipelago, South Australia. At every opportunity Mr. Dannevig gave me facilities for using my dredge. By this means a large number of Invertebrates, not procurable by the trawl, were obtained. The largest collection was made on August 28th at a depth of 95-100 fathoms, south of Cape Wiles, South Australia, the precise position being thirty- nine and a half miles S. 43 E. from Liguanea Island, itself about four miles from Cape Wiles. Here three full loads of the bucket dredge were lifted and_ sieved. The bottom temperature here was not noted, but at 80 fathoms, a short distance away, it was 14’0 Cent. (=57 Fahr.), and the surface at midnight was 12°75 Cent. (=52 Fahr.). It was in this neighbourhood that in January, 1905, Dr.. J. C: Verco, from thesis) Lady Diana,” imadev successful haul thirty-five miles south-west of the Neptune Islands in 104 fathoms, and whence he has recorded so many new species. Including fragments, illegible or undetermined forms, the Cape Wiles haul contained more than three hundred and fifty species, of which I record two hundred and twenty-six. This agrees with my experience in New South Wales and Tas- mania,! indicating that the molluscan fauna of a yard or two of the margin of the Australian Continental Shelf consists of from two hundred and fifty to three hundred and fifty species. This is richer than usual. Based chiefly on American experiences, Dr. W. H. Dall? estimates that about four hundred species would constitute an entire fauna of shell- bearing molluscs from an ordinary region between the limits of 40-60 degrees Fahrenheit. 1 Hedley—Rec. Austr. Mus., vi., 1907, p. 273; Op. cit., vii., 1908, p. 109. 2 Dall & Harris—Bull. U.S. Geol. Survey, No. 84, 1892, p. 26. MOLLUSCA.—HEDLEY. gl The species identified from the Cape Wiles station are as follows :— Nucula beachportensis, Verco. Nucula obliqua, Lamarck. Pronucula decorosa, Hedley. Leda miliacea, Hedley. Poroleda ensicula, Angas. Limopsis erectus, Hedley &~ Petterd. Limopsis eucosmos, Verco. Limopsis tenisoni, Tenison Woods. Limopsis tenisoni, var. penelevis, Verco. Cyrilla concentrica, Verco. Pleurodon maorianus, Hedley. Arca pistachia, Lamarck. Bathyarca perversidens, Hedley. Glycymeris pectinoides, Lamarck. Glycymeris tenuicostatus, Reeve. Philobrya fimbriata, Tate. Philobrya pectinata, Hedley. Trigonia margaritacea, Lamarck. Chlamys antiaustralis, Tate. Cyclopecten favus, Hedley. Lima bassi, Tenison Woods. Lima bullata, Born. Limea austrina, Tate. Limeza murrayi, Smith. Limea parvula, Verco. Modiola linea, Hedley. Modiolaria barbata, Reeve. Arcoperna scapha, Verco. Pholadomya arenosa, Hedley. Myodora albida, Tenitson Woods. Verticordia ericia, Hedley. Verticordia setosa, Hedley. Ectorisma granulata, Tate. Cuspidaria alta, Verco. Crassatellites probleema, Verco. Crassatellites producta, Verco. Cuna atkinsoni, Tenison Woods. Cuna comma, Verco. Cuna concentrica, Hedley. Cuna delta, Tate &~ May. Cuna hamata, Hedley & May. Cuna obliquissima, Tate. Venericardia amabilis, Deshayes. Venericardia bimaculata, Deshayes. Venericardia delicata, Verco. g2 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. Venericardia dilecta, Smith, var. excelsior, Verco. Venericardia rosulenta, Tate. Mytilicardia calyculata, Linne. Condylocardia compressa, Hedley ¢~ May. Cyamiomactra mactroides, Tate € May. Myrtaea bractea, Hedley. Divaricella cumingii, Adams €& Angus. Corbis percostata, Hedley. Vhyasira flexuosa, Montagu. Turquetia integra, Hedley. Coriarius semiradiatus, Tute. Cardium pulchellum, Gray. Gafrarium angasi, Smith. Chione mesodesma, Quoy € Gaimuard. Chione striatissima, Sowerby. Tellina subdiluta, Tate. Soletellina hedleyi, Sowerby. Mactra jacksoniensis, Smith. Saxicava arctica, Linne. Acanthochites crocodilus, Torr & Ashby. Schismope atkinsoni, Tenison Hoods. Schismope pulchra, Petterd. Scissurella australis, Hedley. Emarginula superba, Hedley ¢~ Petterd. Lucapinella nigrita, Sowerby. Megatebennus concatenatus, Crosse ¢> Fischer, Puncturella fumarium, Hedley. Puncturella demissa, Hedley. Gibbula ocellina, Hedley. Monilea oleacea, Hedley ¢> Petterd. Monilea philippensis, Ilutson. Calliostoma allporti, Tentson Woods. Calliostoma columnarium, Hedley & May. Calliostoma legrandi, Tenison Joods. Calliostoma meyeri, Philippi. Calliostoma retiarium, Hedley ¢~ May. Danilia telebathia, Hedley. Euchelus tasmanicus, Tenison TW oods. Leptothyra fugitiva, Hedley. Leptothyra rosea, Tenison Woods. Cirsonella weldu, Tenison Woods. Cyclostrema denselaminatum, lerco. Cyclostrema homalon, Verco. Cyclostrema jaffaensis, lVerco. Liotia annulata, Tenison Woods. Liotia denselineata, Tate. Liota incerta, Tenison Woods. MOLLUSCA.—HEDLEY. Phenacolepas calva, Verco. Cocculina tasmanica, Pilsbry. Nacella crebristriata, Verco. Helcioniscus illabratus, Verco. Rissoa hulliana, Tate, var. eucraspeda, Hedley. Rissoa incompleta, Hedley. Rissoa lockyeri, Hedley. Rissoa verconiana, Hedley. Amphithalamus costatus, Hedley. Amphithalamus pyramidatus, Hedley. Epigrus ischnus, Tate. Rissoina gertrudis, Tenison Woods. Rissoina rhyllensis, Gatliff & Gabriel. Rissoina tasmanica, Tenison Woods. Cithna angulata, Hedley. Calyptraea calyptraeformis, Lamarck. Capulus devotus, Hedley. Mathilda decorata, Hedley. Cerithiopsis dannevigi, Hedley. Cerithiopsis geniculosus, Hedley. Triphora Triphora Triphora Triphora Triphora Triphora Triphora Triphora Triphora Triphora Triphora Triphora Triphora albovittata, Hedley. angasi, Crosse. armillata, Verco. cana, Verco. disjuncta, Verco. epallaxa, Verco. gemmegens, Verco. granifera, Brazier. novapostrema, Verco. pfeifferi, Crosse. regina, Hedley. spica, Verco. tasmanica, Tenison Woods. medio- Turritella atkinsoni, Tenison Woods, var. angulata, Verco. TYurritella mediolevis, Verco. Turritella quadrata, Donald. Turritella smithiana, Donald. Vermicularia flava, Verco. Vermicularia nodosa, Hedley . Janthina exigua, Lamarck. Epitonium acanthopleura, Verco. Epitonium valida, Verco. Syrnola micra, Pritchard & Gatliff. Odostomia mayi, Tate. of “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. Cymatium kampylum, Watson. Cymatium olearium, Linne. Natica elkingtoni, Hedley & May. Natica sticta, Verco. Polinices beddomei, Johnston. Eunaticina albosutura, Verco. Ancilla petterdi, Tate. Cancellaria Marginella Marginella Marginella Marginella Marginella pergradata, Verco. altilabra, May. biplicata, Tate ¢ May. columnaria, Hedley & May. flindersi, Pritchard ¢€ Gatliff. fulgurata, Hedley. Marginella gabrieli, May. Marginella allporti, Tenison Woods. Marginella indiscreta, May. Marginella loddere, May. Marginella microscopica, May. Marginella multiplicata, Tate & May. Marginella ovulum, Sowerby. Marginella Marginella Marginella stanislaus, Tentson Joods. stilla, Hedley. vercoi, May. Conus superstes, Hedley. Daphnella bathentoma, Verco. Daphnella fenestrata, Verco. Daphnella legrandi, Beddome. Daphnella triseriata, Verco. Mangilia gatlifh, Verco. Mangilia hilum, Hedley. Mangilia kingensis, Petterd. Mangilia spica, Hedley. Drillia agrestis, Verco. Drillia denseplicata, Dunker. Drillia dilecta, Hedley. Drillia dulcis, Sowerby. Drillia hectorguia, Verco. Drillia hedleyi, Verco. Drillia jaffaensis, Verco. Drillia lacteola, Verco. Drillia saxea, Sowerby. Drillia tricarinata, Tenison Woods. Drillia trophonoides, Verco. Drillia woodsi, Beddome. Mitromorpha alba, Petterd, var. axiscalpta, Mitromorpha axicostata, Verco. Verco. MOLLUSCA.—HEDLEY. 95 Mitromorpha pallidula, Hedley. Mitromorpha paucilirata, Verco. Mitromorpha paula, Verco. Mitromorpha solida, May. Hemipleurotoma mayi, Verco. Mitra retrocurvata, l’erco. Mitra scalariformis, Tenison Woods. Mitra stadialis, Hedley. Mitra tasmanica, Tenison Woods. Imbricaria porphyria, Verco. Pisania schoutanica, May. Pyrene atkinsoni, Tentson Woods. Pyrene axiaerata, Verco. Pyrene beachportensis, Verco. Pyrene calva, Verco. Pyrene jaffaensis, Verco. Trophon plicilaminatus, Verco. Trophon recurvatus, Verco. Trophon segmentatus, Verco. Coralliophila lischkeana, Dunker. Typhis bivaricata, Verco. Actaeon retusus, Verco. Ringicula meridionalis, Hedley. Ringicula semisculpta, Hedley. Cylichna arachis, Quoy ¢ Gaimard. Cylichna atkinsoni, Tenison Woods. Philine columnarius, Hedley & May. Philine oscitans, Hedley. Cavolina inflexa, Lesueur Cavolina trispinosa, Lesueur. Cavolina virgula, Rang. Limacina bulimoides, D’Orbigny. Limacina inflata, D’Orbigny. Clio balantium, Rang. Clio pyramidata, Linne. Dentalium lubricatum, Sowerby. Dentalium thetidis, Hedley. Yerebratulina cavata, Verco. Megasella cumingil, Davidson. Megasella vercoi, Blochman. Campages jaffaensis, Blochman. Cryptopora brazieri, Crane. Kraussina tasmanica, Tenison Woods. 96 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. II.—DESCRIPTIONS OF NEW OR NOTABLE SPECIES: A.—PELECYPODA. PLEURODON MAORIANUS, Hedley. Pleurodon maorianus, Hedley, Rec. Austr. Mus., v., 1904, ps 87, tiga wat Numerous examples of this occurred off Cape Wiles in too fathoms. Some of these were of larger size than those found in New Zealand, being 3 mm. long and 4 mm. high. The species has not been seen previously in Australian waters. CHLAMYS ANTIAUSTRALIS, Tate. Pecten antiaustralis, Tate, Trans. Roy. Soc. S. Austr., viii., 1386, jp: 106, pl. ix., f. 7a-yemuxan | 1890. p. 20o% Id. Harris, Brit. Mus. Cat. Tert. Moll. Austr., 1897, p. 315. ~. Numerous small valves about half an inch in length were dredged in too fathoms, forty miles south of Cape Wiles, South Australia. Some are brightly coloured either entire lemon-yellow or irregularly clouded with opaque white and vermilion. Similar specimens were dredged by myself in 100 fathoms off Wollongong, New South Wales. Specimens reaching too mm. in diameter were taken plentifully by Mr. W. L. May and myself in 100 fathoms off Cape Pillar, Tas- mania. We considered the species,! as Prof. R. Tate himself had done on first acquaintance, to be a variety of C. asperri- mus, Lamarck. Valid distinctions pointed out by Prof. Tate between the two species are the concentric laminae which lattice the intercostal furrows in the young and the multipli- cation of the ribs in the old stages of C. antiaustralis. Com- pared with actual fossils, the recent shell is flatter, but its author expressly notes that C. antiaustralis ‘‘exhibits varia- tions in the degree of convexity.’’ Probably this is the shell identified by Gatliff and Gabriel as the young of C. radiatus, Hutton.2 In their reference, to my opinion of the: shell, there is some misunderstanding. The species has not hitherto been recorded as recent, and this identification adds another survivor from the Tertiary Fauna. VERTICORDIA ERICIA, sp. nov. (Plate xvii., Hoste eso) Shell small, subcircular, rather solid, apex incurved. Sculpture, about eighteen prominent radiating spiral ribs, which rapidly enlarge with the increase of the shell and pro- 1 Hedley & May—Rec. Austr. Mus., vii., 1908,.p. 113. 2 Gatliff & Gabriel—Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict., xxiii., 1910, p. 98. MOLLUSCA.—HEDLEY. O7 ject at the margin. These are parted by broad and deep interstices, roughened with a grain surface, whereas the summits of the ribs bristle with short, stout, close-set, divari- cating, little spikes. Lunule reduced to a narrow crescent under the umbo. Interior nacreous furrowed by the imprint of the external sculpture. In both valves a single conical tooth is set at the margin of the lunule. Length 6°7, height 6, depth of single valve 2°3 mm. A couple of odd valves occurred in 100 fathoms forty miles south of Cape Wiles, South Australia. Prof. W. A. Haswell and I dredged a fragment in 80 fathoms twenty-two miles. east of Narrabeen, New South Wales. The strong ribs and. prickly sculpture readily distinguish the species. VERTICORDIA SETOSA, Hediey. Verticordia rhomboidea, Hedley, Trans. N.Z. Inst., xxxviii., HOOS Pes viee pli ation, 12, 13, §4 wid eeceuustr. Mus... vi., 1906, p. 215. [Not Verticordia rhomboidea, Tate, rans ROY SOC. S-sANUStr., 1%. eT OSOmIISo7) pa £49) pl. SIV te Ti | Verticordia setosa, Hedley, nom. mut. Rec. Austr. Mus., vi., 1907, P- 303- A single valve from 100 fathoms, forty miles south of Cape Wiles, South Australia, represents a species new to the Adelaidean Region. I took the species first in 110 fathoms off Great Barrier Island, New Zealand, and again in 250 and in 800 fathoms off Sydney. In the South Australian example the radial ribs are less prominent than in the New Zealand shells. VENERICARDIA ROSULENTA, Tate. (Plate xvil.,) fie. 45) Cardita rosulenta, Tate, Trans. Roy. Soc. S. Austr., ix.,. TSO7, 2 OG, ply V.5 b..03 The ‘‘Endeavour’’ took C. rosulenta off Devonport, Tas- mania, and in 4o fathoms north of Cape Borda, South Aus- tralia. A giant from the former locality is 45 mm. in length. As the original figure is vague I offer an illustration of a specimen 28 mm. long from St. Vincent’s Gulf, for the iden- tification and example of which I am indebted to Dr. J. C. Verco.! The nomenclature of this species is involved in difficulty. After the publication of his name, Prof. Tate observed that Tenison Woods had previously recognised? his shell as C. quoyi, Deshayes, and he thereupon withdrew his rosulenta in 1 Verco—Trans. Roy. Soc. S. Austr., xxxii., 1908, p. 349. 2 Tenison Woods—Proec. Roy. Soc. Tasm., 1877, p. 59. ne “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIO RESULTS. its favour.t But Deshayes proposed his name for a New Zealand shell figured and described by Quoy and Gaimard as Venericardia australis, Lamarck. Actually, Deshayes indi- cated for his species Pl. 80, {. 4 of the ‘‘Astrolabe’’ Atlas, but that illustration stands for a Tridacna, and the quotation is an evident error for Pl. 70, f. 12-14. The account of Quoy and Gaimard did not profess to introduce a new species but merely to restore the V. australis of Lamarck,? a small, sub- orbicular, purple, scale-ribbed shell from New Holland, not otherwise figured. The contention of Deshayes was that the Australian shell of Lamarck was wrongly identified with the New Zealand shell of the “‘Astrolabe’’ “Expedition. Regard- ing the latter as a new and nameless species, he proposed to call it Cardita quoyi.3 Until the Lamarckian type, now probably in the Geneva Museum, can be re-examined, we cannot judge whether Quoy and Gaimard were right in their identification, and consequently whether Deshayes Was, or was not, justified in renaming their shell. But there can be no doubt that Reeve erred in reducing V’enericardia australis to a synonym of |’. tridentata, Say.4 In any case the verdict does not affect the name before us. Our species is quite different from that figured in the ‘*Astro- labe”’ Atlas, and to which, if it be maintained, the name of ‘“quoyi’’ can only apply. Incidentally it may be remarked that this name has never been adopted’ by the conchologists of New Zealand whom it chiefly concerns. V. australis, Lamarck, is not the only species of the genus that local workers have failed to recognise. Cardita (Actin- obolus) godeffroyi, Dunker,® from Bass Strait, is here un- known. I suggest that it is likely to prove identical with V. bimaculata, Deshayes. After being unseen for nearly forty years, the Cardita raouli, Angas,’ has been rediscovered by Mr. W. L. May8 in 4o fathoms off Schouten Island, Tasmania. Probably this is what Clessin intends by Cardita racuti, Angas (MS.), from New Zealand.? SUE EE EEEEEEEEEEEES SESE 1 Tate—Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, xxvi., 1901, p. 434 2 Lamarck—Anim. Sans Vert., v., 1818, p. 610. 3 Deshayes—Proc. Zool. Soc. 1852 (1854), p. 103. 4 Reeve—Conch. Icon., i., 1843, Cardita sp. 22. 5 Suter—Index Faunze Nov. Zeal., 1904, p. 93. 6 Dunker—Malak. Blatt., xviii., 1871, p. 172; Schmeltz—Cat. Mus. Godeff., v., 1874, p. 173; Clessin—Conch. Cab., Lief. 355, 1887, p. IO Rolls whyan tia We 1 7 Angas—Proc. Zool. Soc., 1872, p. 613, pl. xlii., f. 12. 8 May—Proc. Roy. Soc. Tasm., 1910 (191i), p. $12. 9 Clessin—Op. cit., p. 11, pl. ii., figs. 7, 8. MOLLUSCA.—HEDLEY. 99 MyYRT4A BRACTEA, sp. nov. (Plate-xvii., figs'51/ G78.) Shell rather solid, moderately convex, flatter in the young stages and becoming more inflated when adolescent, squarely oblong, subequilateral. Colour cream. No radial sculpture. Ribs strong, elevate, varying in number and disposition, usually about fifty and set their breadth apart, spaced medially crowded anteriorly and posteriorly. An occasional rib pro- jects at the edge of the lunule and escutcheon, thus forming a dorsal crest of imbricating seales. Umbo small, prominent. Lunule narrow, excavate, chiefly developed in the left valve. Two cardinals in the left valve. Margins of the valve entire. Length 10°5, height 9°5, depth of single valve 2°5 mm. This species is near M. brazieri, Sowerby,! but larger, rounder, more inflated and more densely ribbed. M. mayi, Gatliff & Gabriel,? is also like it, but M. bractea differs by lacking radial sculpture, by being more inflated and closer ribbed. Hab.—Several specimens from too fathoms, forty miles south of Cape Wiles, South Australia. CORBIS PERCOSTATA, sp. nov. (Plate xvit., figs. °Q, 10, meer 2. ) Shell small, rather solid, inflated inequilateral, anteriorly produced, dorsal margin rather straight, ventral margin rounded. Umbo incurved, bearing a distinct prodissoconch. Sculpture: About thirty-two elevated, strong concentric ribs run from end to end and closely follow one another from the umbo to the ventral margin. From each rib a thin broad flange arching downwards conceals most of the interspace between the ribs. Lunule small, limited by an_ indistinct groove. Pallial line entire, running from one adductor to the other. Within the ventral margin is set a line of small sockets and tubercles about forty-five in number. Dentition: In the right are two cardinals, the posterior strongest, the anterior half the size of its fellow, compressed and parallel to the hinge plate, anteriorly and posteriorly a slender lateral. In the left, the anterior cardinal of typical Corbis is repre- sented by a minute tubercle, posterior cardinal is strong and pointed. Anteriorly a groove receives the right lateral, posteriorly the margin of the valve is produced to act as a lateral. Benind the main cardinals is a slight and elongate chondrophore. Length 4°5, height 3°6, depth of single valve I°3 mm. 1 Sowerby—Proc. Zool. Soc., 1883, p. 31, pl. vii., f. 2, and Hedley—Mem. Austr. Mus., iv., 1902, p. 319. 2 Gatliff & Gabriel—Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict., xxiv., n.s., 1911, p. 189, pl. xlvii., figs. 8-12 I0o “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. This species is nearest related to Chione despecta, Hedley,! from 100 fathoms off Wollongong, New South Wales, than which the novelty is larger, more inequilateral, longer in pro- portion to height and more closely ribbed. When I described C. despecta seven years ago I failed to distinguish the muscle scars. Now I find there is no pallial sinus. But the dis- crepancy between its hinge and that of typical Chione warned me of possible error. Revising the generic position with the aid of the new and related species, | am now constrained to refer both to Corbis. Hitherto only a single recent species, a large and handsome shell from the coral reef zone, has been admitted to this genus. The hinge characters do not exactly correspond. These two small species appear to have suffered such atrophy as descent to calm, deep water might be expected to induce in the hinge development of small and thin shells. Hab.—Numerous specimens in too fathoms forty miles. south of Cape Wiles, South Australia. CHIONE MESODESMA, Quoy ¢> Gaimard. ee, yy Venus mesodesma, Quoy & Gaimard, Voy. ‘‘Astrolabe,’” Zool., ti../1835, p- 532, plaiexxiv., f. 17, 185 id., Souths Rep. Voy. Chall., Zool) amy sss, p. 131. A few specimens in 100 fathoms forty miles south of Cape Wiles. Mr. W. L. May and I took it in abundance in 100 fathoms off Cape Pillar, Tasmania.2 These specimens were worn, and, without close scrutiny, were passed for Chione gallinula, Lamarck. This is the first definite Australian record, though New Holland was assigned to the species in the original description. B.— GASTEROPODA. PUNCTURELLA FUMARIUM, Sp. nov. (Plate xviil., Higss 13, 14.) Shell laterally compressed, thin, translucent, erect, the posterior profile usually slightly convex and the anterior slightly concave. Sculpture: Delicate concentric growth lines, small tubercles, conspicuous in profile, are set in radial rows. Summit irregularly notched, subcircular seen from above, cleft with a short, steep posterior limb seen from the side, the spiral apex disappearing from half-grown specimens Septal plate deeply inserted, nearly perpendicular. Length 2°16, breadth 1°35, height 1ecanam. 1 Hedley—Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, xxviii., 1904, p. 193, pl. x., f. 35-8 2 Hedley & May—Rec. Austr. Mus., vii., 1908, p. 114. MOLLUSCA.—HEDLEY. IOI Already from Australia there are recorded P. hemipsila, Tate, from the Tasmanian Eocene, and recent P. corolla, Verco, from South Australia; P. demissa, Hedley, now recorded from South Australia in association with P. fum- arium, and previously from New South Wales, Victoria and New Zealand; P. galerita, Hedley, from Queensland; P. harrissoni, Beddome, from Tasmania, Victoria and New South Wales, and P. kesteveni, Hedley, from New South Wales. The novelty belongs to the section Fissurisepta now first represented in Australasia. Hab.—Several specimens from too fathoms, forty miles south of Cape Wiles. MONILEA OLEACEA, Hedley & Petterd. Monilea oleacea, Hedley & Petterd, Rec. Austr. Mus., vi. GOGO. Pp: 2h5y Ol XXxvii., fig. a. Some broken but recognisable specimens of this species were taken in 100 fathoms, forty miles south of Cape Wiles. The type was from 250 fathoms outside Svdney, so the present record extends it to another region. The _ specific name appeared in the description by a misprint as ‘‘oleata,”’ but was spelt correctly on the previous page 214 and in the explanation of the plate. b) GIBBULA OCELLINA, sp. nov. (Plate xviii., fig. 15.) Shell small, solid, imperforate, conical, with gradate spire, prominently keeled at the periphery and again at the shoulder. Colour: Below the periphery uniform buff, above it broad, radial stripes of buff pink, alternate with white. Along the periphery are pairs of dashes of madder brown, sometimes these enclose a tinted space and have a background of opaque white, thus assuming an ocellated aspect ; apex pink. Whorls five. Sculpture: Base with seven flat evenly-spaced concen- tric riblets, a strong, revolving cord defines the periphery and ascends the spire. The last and penultimate whorls have four spiral riblets above the periphery, the uppermost stronger and forming the angle of a subsutural shelf. Upper whorls smooth. Aperture round, outer tip simple, dentate by the spirals, columella perpendicular. Length 3, major diam. 3, minor diam. 2°5 mm. The profile recalls that of G. coxi, Angas, but by the sum of its characters this comes nearest to G. tiberiana, Crosse. From that the angulation and smaller size distinguish the novelty. Hab.—Several specimens from 100 fathoms, forty miles south of Cape Wiles, South Australia. 102 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. DANILIA TELEBATHIA, sp. nov. (Plate xviti., figs. 16, 17.) Shell ovate, acuminate, imperforate, thin and_ slightly nacreous. Whorls seven, the first wound horizontally, thus giving the spire a decapitated aspect. Median whorls separated by a channeled suture, flattened on the shoulder and subangled at the periphery, the last slightly descending behind the aperture. Colour: Pale buff with scattered irregular dashes of ochre alternate chocolate dots on the outer lip. Sculpture: The last whorl carries eleven widely-spaced fine spiral cords, the peripheral strongest. Of these six appear on the penultimate and fade gradually away on the upper whorls. Both cords and interspaces are crossed by delicate oblique lamellae which rise into scales upon the cords. They are crowded on the last whorl, do not cross the suture from whorl to whorl, and become fewer and fainter ascending the spire. The initial whorl is smooth. Aperture very oblique, subcircular. Outer lip effuse, fimbriated by the termination of the spiral sculpture, inner lip projecting over the umbilical region, thence spread from the axis to the right insertion as a solid sheet. Columella spirally ascending within, terminat- ing below in a downwardly directed tubercle, succeeded by a deep notch and an answering ridge. Thence along the edge of the gullet underneath the external varix are about a score of callus rays, alternately long and short, leading to the throat. Behind the aperture, about a millemetre from the free edge, is a sharp, narrow varix rising gradually at the base and ending abruptly at the suture. Length 10, breadth 8 mm. Judging from literature, our shell is more elevated and finely sculptured than D. tine, Calcara. This genus has not before been reported from the Southern Hemisphere. As in the Mediterranean and off the Azores, it appears to be confined to deep water. While on the subject of deep-sea Trochoids, I take this opportunity of pointing out that Trochus (Gibbula) glyptus, Watson,! from 410 fathoms off Sydney, should be transferred to Turcicula. Hab.—Several specimens from 100 fathoms forty miles south of Cape Wiles, South Australia. LEPTOTHYRA FUGITIVA, Sp. nov. (Plate xviii., figs. 18, 19, 20.) Shell small, solid, depressed-turbinate, narrowly perforate. Colour white. Whorls three and a half, rapidly increasing, last rounded, descending at the aperture. Spire slightly 1 Watson—Chall. Rep., Zool., xv., 1886, p. 75, pl. vi., fig. 6. MOLLUSCA.—HEDLEY. 103 gradate. Sculpture: On the base and spire are faint traces of radial sculpture. Along the suture runs a C»ep groove followed by a corresponding ridge. The remainder of the last whorl is surrounded by a succession of numerous fine spiral threads parted by equal grooves. Aperture subcircular, above with the vestige of a varix, below a fold running from the anterior edge of the mouth to the margin of the umbilicus, edge of lip simple bevelled within, columella excavate. Base rather flat. Umbilicus narrow but deep, a sixth of the shell’s diameter. Major diameter 1°85, minor diameter 1°55, height 1-2 mm. This is smaller, flatter and more finely grooved than other Australian species. Hab.—Numerous specimens were dredged in 100 fathoms forty miles south of Cape Wiles, South Australia. RISSOA HULLIANA, Tate, ‘VAR. EUCRASPEDA, var. now. (Plate xvii, figs y2ne) This deep-sea variety differs from the typical shore form by being pure white, slightly larger and comparatively broader, and by having fewer and more prominent radials. Thus it acquires a lip broader and more scalloped, approaching a varix. Hab.—Several specimens in 100 fathoms forty miles south of Cape Wiles, South Australia. RISSOA LOCKYERI, sp. nov. (Plate xviii., fig. 22.) Shell small, rather thin, ovate-conical, imperforate. Colour white. Whorls four, of which the two first are sharply marked off as the protoconch. Sculpture: On the shoulder is a smooth, unbroken slope, succeeded by elevated, widely- spaced spiral keels, of which the last whorl bears eight and the penultimate three. On the earlier whorls are numerous fine spiral strie. The interstices of the keels are engraved with close radial scratches. Aperture subcircular, lip slightly expanded. Behind the columella is a narrow axial crevice. Length 2, breadth 1°3 mm. The species is named in honour of Mr. N. Lockyer, Comp- troller of Customs, under whose auspices these collections were made. It is related to R. imbrex,! than which it is smaller, broader in proportion, and possesses more spirals. Hab.—Numerous specimens were taken in 100 fathoms forty miles south of Cape Wiles, South Australia. 1 Hedley—Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, xxxili., 1908, p. 469, pl. x., f. 33. 104 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. RISSOA VERCONIANA, Sp. nov. (Plate. xix. fie .\23-) Shell small, ovate, thin, translucent. Colour white. Whorls four, rounded and parted by deep sutures. Sculpture: First whorl and a half smooth, next with about twenty-five sharp though delicate radial ribs, these increase till on the last whorl they amount to about forty, below the periphery they fade gradually. Different individuals vary in the development and number of these radials. On the last whorl eight or ten spirals equal in grade to the radials override them, thus enclosing rectangular meshes. On the upper whorls the spirals grad- ually vanish, so that on the base are spirals alone and on the upper whorls radials alone. A secondary microscopic sculp- ture of close spiral scratches is most conspicuous in the meshes of the body whorl. Aperture subcircular, angled above. Outer lip fortified by a slight external varix, columella margin expanded and reflected over a small umbilical furrow. Length 2, breadth 1 25 mm. This species is closely related to R. filosa, Hedley and Petterd,! from the east coast, but that is larger, has an extra whorl and is more coarsely sculptured. That the difference is not due to growth is shown by the contrast between the upper whorls of the two species. The novelty is dedicated to Dr. J. C. Verco, who has done such admirable work on the Marine Mollusca of South Australia. Hab.—Numerous specimens from 1oo fathoms forty miles south of Cape Wiles, South Australia. AMPHITHALAMUS COSTATUS, sp. nov (Plate xix., fig. 24.) Shell small, rather solid, imperforate, narrowly oblong, glossy. Colour uniform ivory white. Whorls five, including a smooth turbinate protoconch of two whorls. Adult whorls wound obliquely, parted by a deeply channeled suture. Sculp- ture: Broad, flat radial ribs of irregular breadth, crowded on the last half whorl, their ends denticulate the summits of the whorls. So sharp and narrow are the interstices as to resemble cracks. On the last whorl the radials amount to twenty-two. Aperture trumpet-mouthed, oblique, submedian. Length 3, breadth 1°3. Attempts have been made by Tryon? and by Tate? to sub- divide the Rissoa of Australia into groups. These arrange- ments, though helpful, cannot be regarded as final. If only 1 Hedley & Petterd—Rec. Austr. Mus., vi., 1906, p. 217, pl. xxxvii., f. 2. 2 Tryon—Man. Conch., ix., 1887, pp. 314-69. 3 Tate—Trans. Roy. Soc. 8S. Austr., xxiii., 1899, pp. 232-7. MOLLUSCA.—HEDLEY. 105 as a convenience it would be desirable to break up a genus so unwieldy as Rissoa is according to Tryon’s presentation. Bearing in mind that the type of Rissoa, Freminville, 1814, is Turbo cimex., Linn.,! it is clear that many of the Australian shells usually so called are not entitled to the name. In studying the Rissoide taken by the ‘‘Thetis’’ Expedition,? I noted that, though Watson’s subgenus Scrobs had been reduced by Tryon to a synonym of the earlier Amphithalamus, Carpenter, yet Carpenter’s type was rejected by Tryon as insufficiently known. Under these circumstances it seemed unsafe to use Amphithalamus. By the kindness of Mrs. B. Williamson, of Los Angeles, Cali- fornia, I have received a specimen of the type species of the genus 4. inclusus, Carp., collected by Mr. Henry Hemphill. No illustration of the species seems to have yet appeared, so I figure (Pl. xx., fig. 34) the gift of Mrs. Williamson, which had been identified as A. inclusus, Carp.,3 by Dr. W. H. Dall. On this foundation I can now accept and use Tryon’s interpretation of the synonomy. Rep-) Zool xv., 1886, pxeresplxivi., f.-35. (Not R. badia, Petterd, 1884.) | A. KERSHAWI, Ten. Woods. Risoina kershawi, Ten. Woods, Trans. Roy. Soc. Vict., xiv., 1878, Pp: .57- R. tumida (Ten. W oods), Tate and May, Procy Linn Soc NES Wales, exvie, 1901; ‘pl’ xxwie, 167: A. OLIVACEUS, Frauenfeld. Alvania olivacea, Frauenfeld, Reise der Novara, Zool., ii., 3, Py Lily Plead, te Ley As synonyms of this Brazier (Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales [seal tee 1895, p- 696) has reduced Diala tumida (Ten. Woods, Proc. Roy. Soc. Tasm., 1875, p- 14) and Rissoa diemenensis (Petterd, Journ. of €onch., iv, 18845 ps gs.) A. PELLUCIDUS, Tate & May. Rissoa (Nodulus) pellucida, Tate and May, Trans. Roy. Soc. Ss Austr), xxiv.,91900, p. 100 ;7d eabrocy Linn: S0c..N:S. Wales. xxvi., roo1, pl. xxiil.,. fi: A. PETTERDI, Brazier. Rissoa petterdi, Brazier, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, ix., 1895, p- 697; id., Tate and May, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S Wales, xxvl. t901, pls xo fs 73 |[nom. mut. for R. pulchella (Petterd, Journ. of Goncue iv., 1884, p. 138)]. A. PULVILLUS, Hedley. Rissoa pulvillus, Hedley, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, xxx., GOGO. pa G20. pl, Xxxil., f. 215. A. PYRAMIDATUS, Hedley. Scrobs pyramidatus, Hedley, Mem. Austr. Mus., iv., 1903, P- 354, f. 77. A. RuBICUNDUS, Tate & May. Rissoa (Cingula) rubicunda, Tate and May, Trans. Roy. Soc. S. Austr., xxiv., 1900, p. 100; 7d., May, Trans. Roy. Soc. Tasm:lqo2"(1903), p. 1x4) ft. 108 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. A. SALEBROSUS, Frauenfeld. Alvania salebrosa, Frauenfeld, Reise der Novara, Zool., i., 3, LOOT, pall, pk. Met as. A. SCROBICULATOR, Watson. Rissoa (Scrobs) scrobiculator, Watson, Chall. Rep., Zool., XV, "rSS6,ep.) 61. pltslyi. sepa: A. suBFuscUSs, Hutton. Barleeia subfusca, Hutton, Cat. N.Z. Moll., 1873, p. 28. Rissoa purpurea (Hutton), Tryon, Man. Conch., ix., 1887, pe 244, ple Ix, £89. Recorded as Victorian by Gatliff and Gabriel (Proc. Roy. Soc. With, May. Natica elkington, Hedley and May, Rec. Austr. Mus., vil 1908, P. 11O, pl. xxuly fans: This species was recently discovered off the Tasmanian coast, and is new to South Australia. It appears in the dredging of too fathoms forty miles south of Cape Wiles, South Australia. 4 =9 MARGINELLA FULGURATA, Sp. nov. d]- ar = (Plate xii, figs sormgues 32-.30)) Shell ovate, solid, glossy, with a buried spire. Colour variable; ordinarily on a white ground are drawn narrow, longitudinally directed, orange, zig-zag lines describing about a dozen angles in the shell’s length, about ten such to a whorl. MOLLUSCA.— HEDLEY. LTT The elbows pointing to the right are filled in with three or four longitudinal strokes. Two spiral bands are indicated by the darkening of one line of markings near the shoulder and of another above the centre. Complete gradations occur between this pattern and one in which the cross strokes and dark spirals are both absent, while broader, fewer, orange lines describe fewer and larger angles. In form the shell passes through a metamorphosis. For about three whorls it is rolled in the same plane, thus exposing above the summits of previous whorls in a flat spire. Passing from a subcylin- drical to an ovate shape, the whorl commences to ascend. A callus pad proceeding from the inner lip is piled on the summit. The axis of the shell is marked by a slight depression from beside which the lip springs. A spiral crest, to which the growth striz are brushed backwards, runs from the vertex around the summit. The columella plaits are variable. Two prominent ones always appear at the anterior extremity, above these and decreasing in size posteriorly there may be from one to seven. the uppermost usually too deep-seated to be visible externally. The inner margin of the lip is finely denticulated for the whole length by about twenty tubercles. In the voung stage the throat is grooved to correspond. Length &8°5, breadth 5 mm. This species ranges west to Cape Lewin and north along the West Australian coast to the tropics. It is well known from the beaches of the latter region. Australian collectors have commonly received it through Tryon and Brazier’s identi- fication as M. sagittata, Hinds. But that is a native of the tropical West Atlantic,! and in colour pattern does not correspond. The record of M. sagittata, from Hao in the Paumotus, by Couturier,? appears to me to need confirmation. M. pulchella, Kiener, from Norfolk Island,’ is near this, but is narrower above and appears to have a regular involute growth. In many respects the description of Marginella liturata, Menke,’ agrees, but that unrecognised West Aus- tralian shell is excluded by ‘“‘spira breve conica.”’ CONUS SUPERSTES, sp. nov. (Plate xx:, fiesaia5ee ees) Shell small, solid, regularly conical, angled at the shoulder. Apex mamillate smooth, two whorled, slightly oblique. Sculpture: The whole shell is decorated with flat spiral cords 1 Smith—Journ. Linn. Soc., xx., 1890, p. 489. 2 Conturier—Journ. de Conch., lvy., 1907, p. 132. 3 Brazier—Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales (2), ii., 1888, p. 997. 4 Menke—Moll. Nov. Holl., 1843, p. 28. 112 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. defined by narrow, shallow grooves. On the last whorl there are three sulci above and twenty-five below the shoulder, anteriorly these become more crowded and oblique. | The whole shell is traversed by delicate growth-strie. Colour white, in a few examples faint brown dashes appear on the shoulder. Aperture linear. Whorls six, including the proto- conch. Length 8°5, breadth 4 mm. Probably the species attains a larger size, but, as the apex is the chief distinction, larger examples would be recognisable from the present information. Apparently its nearest relation is C. convexus, Harris,! from the Victorian Eocene, of which I have not seen specimens. Compared with C. anemone, Lamarck, the apex of C. superstes is more mamillate, and the spiral grooves are stronger; the shoulder of the spire whorls are not tuberculate in superstes, as they are in anemone. Hab.—Several specimens, mostly young, from 100 fathoms forty miles south of Cape Wiles, South Australia. MITRA STADIALIS, sp. nov (Plate sexeyphiees 37. | Shell small, thin, fusiform. Colour white, opaque and glossy above the horizon of the lip insertion, below that level dull and subtranslucent, a spiral pair of orange threads run along the centre of each whorl. Whorls seven, of which two form a small and glossy protoconch. Sculpture: Low, rounded radial ribs, about eighteen to a whorl, their breadth apart, traverse the upper whorls and cease at the subtrans- lucent zone. On the upper part of the whorl are a few lightly engraved spirals, the most conspicuous following the pair of colour lines. Six slight and crowded spirals run along the tip of the snout. Aperture narrow, canal short, bent, outer lip lirate within, inner lip a thin callus. Plaits four, deep- seated, upper nearly horizontal, lower oblique. Length 8'5, breadth 3 mm. This species is allied to M. tasmanica, Ten. Woods, but ts narrower, with slighter sculpture. Hab.—Several specimens from 100 fathoms forty miles south of Cape Wiles, South Australia. RINGICULA MERIDIONALIS, sp. nov (Plate xx., fig. 38.) Shell ovate, thin, glossy, the more solid parts opaque white, the less solid translucent pearl grey. Whorls five. Sculp- ture: The whole shell is girt with flat-topped spiral ribs parted 1 Harris—Brit. Mus. Cat. Tert. Moll. Austr., i., 1897, p. 31, pl. ii., f. 5. MOLLUSCA._HEDLEY. ate) by sharp but shallow spiral grooves, these are evenly dis- tributed, they amount to sixteen on the last whorl and to six on the penultimate and antepenultimate in the example drawn. In other instances the ribbing is closer. Aperture: The outer lip is thickened to form a slight external varix but is not dentate within. Columella with two strong plications, above which a callus thick-spread on the body whorl projects a broad, blunt tubercle into the aperture. Length 2°5, breadth 1°65 mm. R. australis, Hinds, also from South Australia, is larger but proportionately narrower. R. delecta, Murdoch and Suter, from New Zealand, is larger, proportionately broader and more densely striated. Hab.-—Numerous specimens were dredged in 100 fathoms forty miles south of Cape Wiles. RINGICULA SEMISCULPTA, sp. nov. (Plate ixx.; figs. gover) Shell rather large and thin for the genus, ovate-globose, glossy, subtranslucent. Whorls rounded, five, including a tilted subimmersed apex. Suture impressed, bordered by an opaque iine. Sculpture: Everywhere are fine microscopic growth lines, and on the shoulder a few microscopic revolving scratches, on the base half a dozen widely-spaced spiral grooves. Outer lip thickened in a low varix, not dentate, sinuate posteriorly, insertion rising a little above the line of the suture. Inner lip spread on the body whorl! in a thick callus, but without any tubercle. Columella with two pro- minent, deeply-entering folds, the anterior larger and pro- jecting beyond the canal. Length 5, breadth 3°5 mm. Judging from literature, it is related to R. nitida, Verrill, from which the spiral sculpture would distinguish it. Hab.—A few specimens from too fathoms forty miles south of Cape Wiles, South Australia. I have also taken it in 80 fathoms off Narrabeen, New South Wales, and in 300 fathoms off Sydney. C.—SCAPHOPODA. DENTALIUM THETIDIS, Hedley. Dentalium thetidis, Hedley, Mem. Austr. Mus., iv., 1903, P= 32711> Or. This species is new to the province, not having yet been recorded beyond the original habitat of New South Wales. A few specimens occurred in 100 fathoms forty miles south of Cape Wiles, South Australia. Whereas the type has but 114 “ENDEAVOUR” SOIENTIFIC RESULTS. seven ribs, these have mostly eight, but sometimes nine or even ten. The intercostal threads are less distinct in the western examples. D.—_BRACHIOPODA. CAMPAGES JAFFAENSIS, Blochmann. (Plate xx., figs. 41, 42.) Magasella jaffaensis, Blochmann, Trans. Roy. Soc. S. Austr., XXKIV.,' I9OI1O, p: 92, pl... xy eh, 6-9. In describing this species, Professor Blochmann seems to have used imperfect material, at any rate, his figure displays the brachial apparatus in a broken state. It is therefore here refigured. The original definition of Magasellat runs:—‘‘Shell with the reflected portions of the apophyses united, forming a loop.’’ In the Australian shell the union of the apophyses is carried to a much greater extent. They join in a hood or funnel rather than a loop. The ascending and descending limbs also coalesce in a fold which forms a double wall to the funnel. Further, the mesial septum does not project beyond the fold and is insignificant compared to the development attained in typical Magasella. These characters seem as substantial as those by which Magasella is differentiated from other groups, and I have therefore already employed them to found a genus Campages.? C. jaffaensis is quite distinct from the type species C. furcifera, which attains a larger size and has the corners of the mouth turned down. From P. Eichier’s illustrations’ it would appear that Magellania joubini, Blochmann, should also be referred to Campages. In describing Cistella australis, Blochmann‘ appears to have overlooked Dall’s correction® of that generic name. Cistella, Gray, 1853, was preoccupied by Cistella, Gistel, 1848; in sub- stitution, Dr. Dall has proposed ‘‘Argyrotheca.’’ Hab.—The ‘‘Endeavour’’ trawled C. jaffaensis in 40 fathoms north of Cape Borda, South Australia. I have taken it in 250 fathoms outside Sydney, in 80 fathoms outside Narrabeen, and, in conjunction with Mr. W. L. May, in 100 fathoms off Cape Pillar, Tasmania. 1 Dall—Am. Journ. Conch., vi., 1871, p. 134. 2 Hedley—Rec. Austr. Mus., vi., 1905, p. 43, f. 5, 6. 3 LT pce Sud-Pol. Exped., xii., Zool., iv., 1911, p. 388, pl. xliv., 4 Blochmann—Trans. Roy. Soc. S. Austr., xxxiv., 1910, p. 93, pl. xxvii., for 10512: 5 Dall--Nautilus, xiv., Aug. 1900, p. 44. hes Commonwealth of Australia. Department of Trade and Customs. Pilot iNge: Zoological Results of the Fishing Experiments carried out by the F.I.S. ‘‘ Endeavour,”’ 1909-10 (H. C. Dannevig, Commonwealth Director of Fisheries). PART II. 223205 = ntl eat ASB - PUBLISHED BY DIRECTION OF THE HONORABLE FRANK GWYNNE TUDOR, MINISTER FOR TRADE AND CUSTOMS. Sydney, duly 9th, 1912. EDWARD LEE & Co., 14 CARRINGTON STREET, SYDNEY. III. Report on the Sponges obtained by the F.I.S. ‘“ Endeavour’’ on the Coasts of New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia, Queensland, and ‘Tas- mania. AU ola aele BY Be Ee. HALLMANN, B:S@s, Zoonocist Australian Museum, Syduey. Plates XXI.-XXXVI.; Text-figs. 21-69. SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 117 II]. REPORT ON THE SPONGES: Paris 1.—INTRODUCTION. The Sponges which have so far been obtained by the ‘*Endeavour’’ consist almost exclusively of Monaxonellida and Keratosa in approximately equal numbers. In this Report I propose to deal only with the former of these; the latter will scarcely prove suitable for purposes of investigation unless taken in conjunction with additional material, since in the main they are preserved in a dry condition, and there are among them altogether too few specimens of any one species. Inasmuch as an extensive collection of well-preserved Keratose sponges, particularly from the Australian area, would un- questionably be of extreme scientific value, it is greatly to be hoped that the fullest advantage will be taken of the unique opportunities provided by the trawling operations of the ‘‘Endeavour’’ to bring together as large a number as possible of these forms. In order to deal effectively with the material placed at my disposal, it was found necessary, as a preliminary task, to undertake the re-investigation of certain previously described species, including more particularly a number of those which were first described by Dr. R. von Lendenfeld in his ‘‘ Descrip- tive Catalogue of Sponges in the Australian Museum,’’! and afterwards by Mr. T. Whitelegge in his “‘Report on Sponges from the Coastal Beaches of New South Wales.’ As a result I find that, whereas the latter author is correct in pronouncing the original descriptions of these species to be in many instances inaccurate, yet he himself has committed a number of serious errors, owing to a too hasty conclusion that the specimens investigated were the actual types. This explains the anomalous circumstance that the descriptions which the two authors have given of certain species are devoid of agreement in any essential particular. Unfortun- ately, however, not all the discrepancies can be thus explained, and considerable caution will be necessary in deciding par- ticular cases. Mr. Whitelegge evidently proceeded on the assumption that the specimen carrying the author’s label must be accepted unquestioningly, in preference to the description, as the ultimate criterion of the species; but, although such a 1 8vo, Sydney, 1888. 2 Whitelegge—Rec. Austr. Mus., iv., 2, 1901, p. 55, pls. x.-xv 118 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. course may be perfectly reasonable and right so jong as the authenticity of the specimen remains undoubted, it surely can no longer be pursued when sufficient evidence exists to prove the contrary. It was not my intention, at the outset, to include in this Keport any details of the results of this subsidiary investiga- tion {except in so far as they bore directly upon the species of the ‘‘Endeavour’’ collection), but to reserve them as_ the subject of an independent paper. Owing, however, to the very unsatisfactory state of the descriptions of many of the species examined, and in view of the possibility that a con- siderable time may elapse before a complete account of them can be furnished, I came to the conclusion that it would be wrong to allow this opportunity to pass without at any rate making such corrections as might render possible their identi- fication. Accordingly I have added to the Report, often in the form merely of foot- -notes, a series of observations which practically amount to a brief revision of the Ectyonine originally described in various publications of the Aus- tralian Museum. As the work of preparation was con- ducted in the Australian Museum itself, I have had the advan- tage of having before me in most cases the actual specimens, and in many cases the actual slides upon which the original descriptions were based. In addition, very material assist- ance was afforded me in the identification of species by a valuable series of mounted sections of Port Phillip sponges and a large number of fragments of Australian sponges pre- served in the British Museum, which Prof. A. Dendy some years ago generously placed at the disposal of this Museum. In regard to certain Ectyonine species I have expressed the opinion that new genera should be established for them, but I have purposely refrained from introducing such new genera because I recognise that, in order to do this in a thoratenily satisfactory manner, it would be necessary to undertake a much wider comparative study of the species of this group than—owing to lack of literature, if for no other reason—I have found to be possible. After the manuscript of the Report had been completed and at too late a date to admit of any alterations in the text, I received a copy of the second part of Dr. Hentschel’s paper on the sponges of South-west Australia; consequently any de- ductions which it has enabled me to make are necessarily relegated to the footnotes, or to concluding paragraphs. SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 119 Il. —_DESCRIPTION OF THE GENERA AND SPECIES. FamiLty: SPIRASTRELLIDE. GENUS SPIRASTRELLA, Schmidt. SPIRASTRELLA MONTIFORMIS, Sp. nov. (Plate: xxi., fig. 2 and ties (27.)) Sponge mound-shaped, rising to a central peak, on the summit of which one or several oscula are situated; upper aspect of sponge with short digitiform or ridge- like processes on which apical oscula are rarely to be found. No rind. Spicules not aggregated into definite fibres. Megascleres:—Tylostyli (sometimes reduced to styli), of varying length and stoutness, reaching a maxi- mum size of 710 X 12 p. Microscleres :—S pirasters of two kinds, viz., shorter tuberculated forms principally conjined to the superficial layer, 25 long; and slender zigzag sharp-spined forms chiefly to be. found in the canal walis of the interior and reaching to So y or more in length. This species is represented in the collection by eight speci- mens, all of which are preserved in the dry state. Although showing a moderate amount of variability in external form, they may be satisfactorily described in general terms as mas- sive, sessile, somewhat mound- shaped sponges, roughly circular in horizontal section, and usually prolonged upwards into a more or less well-defined pinnacle. They are attached by a broad base of only slightly lesser extent than the maxi- mum transversal of the sponge, which is attained some short distance above it. The fact that the maximum girth does not coincide with the actual base, renders the term ‘‘mound- shaped’’ not perfectly applicable, and admits of a distinction into an extensive upper surface, and a restricted lower one. [From the former there arise few or many elevations in the form either of short digitiform processes, or of compressed ridges. The interior of the sponge, to within a few milli- metres of the surface, is traversed by numerous rather wide canals, some of which attain a diameter of ro mm. ; they are lined by a distinct aspiculous membrane, which also forms dissepiments across their lumina. The central peak is pene- trated to its apex by one or several of these canals, which terminate in a corresponding number of oscula. Occasionally a few of the secondary elevations are similarly provided, but usually they contain only minor branches of the canal system. 120 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. In the present condition of the sponges, the oscula are closed, and not readily perceived; but their presence is, in every case, indicated by longitudinal furrows and puckers of the extremity of the processes bearing them, and is, of course, readily demonstrated by sectioning. Of the specimens of the present series, the largest and the smallest are those which depart most from the mean form. The former is sub-elliptical in horizontal outline, and in 120 mm. in height; the principal diameters of its base are 140 mm. and 90 mm. respectively, whilst the cor- responding measurements of its greatest transverse section are 200 mm. and 120 mm. It is fur- nished with more than 100 pro- cesses, the greater number of which are ridge-shaped. The smallest specimen is subfusiform in shape, and is provided with only four digitiform processes. The consistency in the dry state is, one might say, intermediate between that of cork and pith; the superficial layer is slightly harder and more friable, but there is no indication of a rind. The colour is pale grey within, and yellowish- grey on the surface. The skeleton is diffuse, without any indication of definite fibres, and consists of a fairly dense and irregular aggre- gation of straight spicules show- ing all gradations between styli and tylostyli. Even in proximity to the surface there is no well- Fig. 21—S. montiformis. a defined arrangement of the mega- Larger tylostyli (basal ex- scleres, although a considerable tremity). b Slender tylo- proportion of them stand more or styli (ditto). c Spined spi- [ancumeae Bea eee le sade rasters. d Tuberculated BS PA Ce oe spiraster. points (or not infrequently, in the case of the larger spicules, with their basal extremities) impinging on, or barely projecting beyond, the surface. The spirasters are comparatively few in number and are confined almost exclusively to the external surface and to the walls of the canals immediately beneath their lining membrane. SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 121 Megascleres.—It is difficult to say whether these belong to one, two, or three categories. At first sight it might appear that two kinds are to be distinguished, viz., (1.) stouter tylo- styli, with a tylosis of only moderate size, which is perhaps most frequently subterminal in position and more or less re- duced (or sometimes absent) and which has a quite smooth surface and not very variable contour; and (ii.) very slender tylostyli (of scarcely lesser length), in which the frequently relatively large tylosis is extremely variable in shape and size, often exhibits tubercular irregularities of the surface, and is occasionally several times repeated. The former spicules vary in length from less than 200 y to slightly more than 700 1, and in diameter up to 12 #1; it is seldom, however, that their length exceeds 650 yj or their diameter 10 ft; usually they taper to a quite sharp point, but more or less strongylote terminations occur. ‘The latter or slender tylostyli appear to be rarely more than 3 y in diameter and may attain a length of at least 640 yw. A more thorough scrutiny of the spicules shows, however, that forms intermediate between these kinds occur, though they are comparatively few in number; and, taking all the facts into consideration, it 1s not possible to decide with certainty whether the two degrees of stoutness are merely the expression of different developmental stages, or whether they have a more important significance and indicate either that the spicules have undergone a partial differentia- tion into two groups or actually represent two distinct orders. Again, it is to be observed that the stouter spicules vary con- siderably in length; and on analysis it appears not improbable that in another respect also a certain amount of differentiation into two groups has been affected since a relatively large pro- portion of the spicules below a length of 300 yt or thereabouts (the diameter of which is 6 to 8 y) are simply stylote, and are subfusiform in shape. But these peculiarities are not confined to the shorter spicules, and are not, indeed, strikingly charac- teristic of them. These shorter spicules appear to greatly predominate amongst those which stand perpendicularly at the surface of the sponge. Microscleres.—Spirasters of two kinds occur: (i.) Small tuberculated forms, extremely variable in shape, often with the tubercules chiefly confined to one side, 12 to 32 in length, and up to 4 pw in breadth exclu- sive of the tubercules. These, together with an inconsiderable admixture of those of the second kind, form an exceedingly thin but apparently not continu- ous superficial layer, and also occur in limited numbers in the canal walls. 122 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. (ii.) Elongated spined forms, occurring for the most part only in the immediate circumference of the canals, 1 the walls of which they lie tangentially, loosely scattered in a single layer. It frequently happens that several together are apposed so closely, and in such a way, that they cannot by any means be distinguished from a single large branched spicule. Speaking generally, they are characterised by their slender zig- zag form, and the very evident spiral arrangement of their spines. Their length, which is rather variable, sometimes reaches above 80 y; their diameter rarely exceeds 3 jl Loc.—East coast of Queensland, seven miles east of Double Island Point, 33 fms. (‘‘Endeavour’’). S. montiformis is probably most nearly related to S. vaga- bunda, Ridley, and S. tentorioides, Dendy. ‘The striking resemblance which its elongated zigzag spirasters bear to those of Clonopsis platei, Vhiele, and to certain species of Cliona, not only supports the opinion that Spirastrella, Cliona and Clionopsis are allied genera, but seems also to show that such spirasters are of primitive form. SPIRASTRELLA POCULOIDES, sp. nov. (Plate xxi. , fio. | Tyandahc.* 22. ) Sponge sessile, massively cup-shaped. Surface smooth; even, or provided with a few low dome-shaped eleva- tions. The oscula (?) are microscopic circular openings onan average *25 mm. apart. Skeleton semi-diffuse, non- fibrous; spirasters scattered in moderate abundance throughout all parts and forming a cortical layer. Megas- cleres :—T ylostyli of a single kind measuring 560 x 13 l. Microscleres :—Spirasters of a single kind, 50 x 10 uy. The following description is based on a single specimen. The sponge is a stout-walled and exceeding thick-bottomed, compressed, sessile cup. Its shape may be conceived as hav- ing been attained by the upgrowth of a broad pillar, in which growth has proceeded most rapidly at the periphery. The surface is very smooth, and generally even; the only inequali- ties are in the form of a few broad, rounded protuberances. The interior of the sponge is free from noticeable cavities, and of very uniform structure throughout. The texture of its internal substance, when dry, is such as might result from the close compression of some finely divided fibrous material ; there is no appearance macroscopically of extended fibres. Owing to the firmness and density of the superficial layer and the SPONGES.—_HALLMANN. 123 compactness of the skeleton generally, the sponge is (in the dry state) fairly hard and incompressible. The dimensions of the specimen are as follows :—Height, too mm. ; depth of cup, 40 mm.; average thickness of cup-wall, 15 mm.; principal internal diameters of cup, 120 mm. and 30 mm. No oscula are visible to the naked eye. The surface, however, is pierced by minute circular openings 40 to 50 # in diameter and, on an average, about 250 yw apart. Ina a thick vertical section, cut trans- versely through the cup-wall, two regions are roughly distinguishable : (i.) A superficial layer varying from I mm. to 4 mm. wide, in which the spicules are not at all collected into x strands, but are closely crowded without recognis- a able order except in some parts of its outer limits, where the majority of the spicules may stand more or less perpendicularly to the surface. The _ spirasters, which are plentifully scat- a tered throughout the whole sponge, become more and more Closely aggregated as the surface is approached, 7 and ultimately produce, by their close crowding, a dense and compact thin b external crust. ; 5 (ii.) An extensive central region traversed by irregularly sinuous, ascending “‘fibres’’ Big. 22S. poculoides or ‘‘columns’’ composed of a_ Tylostyle. 4 Ditto loosely associated spicules. basalextremity). b Spi- It the section ‘the ster “‘columns’’ appear to be discontinuous, owing pro- bably to their passing out of the plane of section. They sometimes broaden out into diffuse bands, sometimes contract into more compact strands. The 124 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. spaces between the ‘‘columns’’ are occupied by a pro- fusion of single spicules, spicule bundles, short spicule str ands and sheet-like patches, as w ell as by scattered spirasters: all of which together constitute no inconsiderable proportion of the entire skeleton, and in macroscopic examination mask from view the more definitely fibrous aggregations of the spicules. Spicules. (i.) The megascleres are tylostyli which, as a rule, are straight; they are of uniform diameter throughout the greater part of their length and gradually taper thence to a sharp point; greatest size 560 x 13 y. (ii.) The spirasters are of a single kind and reach a length of 50 jt (though usually much shorter) and a dia- meter, exclusive of spines, of 5 to 10 7. The spines are large, approximating in length to the diameter of the spicule-shaft, and in the case of the larger spic- ules are about twenty in number. Loc.—North coast of New South Wales, eight miles east of Sandon Bluffs, 35-40 fms. (‘‘Endeavour’’). SPIRASTRELLA ALCYONIOIDES, SD nov (Plate xxi., fig? 2;.andifig. 23.) Sponge an erect, compact, sessile cluster of frondiform or of angular or only slightly compressed digitiform up- growths, of which some proceed from the very base of the sponge, whilst some arise as outgrowths or lobes from others. Oscula situated apically on the digitiform ter- minals. Surface smooth, with slight longitudinal in- equalities and a few small ascendant papilliform projec- tions. Sponge in the dry state very hard. Skeleton semi-diffuse; without fibres, but with occasional very broad columns of parallely-arranged spicules. The sub- stance of the sponge is abundantly traversed by browntsh spongin-like streaks which, however, show no particular relation to the spicule arrangement. Spirasters of a single kind are plentifully scattered through all parts and form a compact superficial layer. Spicules :—Tylostyli of one kind, with blunt rounded distal extremity, measuring 440 x 8 w; and large-spined stout spirasters, 40 x 7 ML. Two specimens of this species were obtained, both of which are preserved in a dry state. The characteristic form of the sponge appears to result from the upgrowth, in the first place, of a few processes from a basal disk of limited extent, which processes, as they grow, either remain simply digitiform, SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 125 or become broadened and flattened (frondiform) and more or less subdivided. In any case the uppermost part of the sponge consists chiefly, of separated digitiform terminals, which are usually tapered and somewhat pointed, and are provided apically each with one or a few oscula. The larger speci- men (Plate xxi., fig. 3), which measures 130 mm. in height, consists almost entirely of frondiform components ; the smaller, q if digitiform. Inits dried , condition, the sponge is particularly dense, hard and tough; although the amount of shrinkage has seemingly been but slight. The surface is smooth, but slightly uneven owing to the presence of dis- continuous undulations and obscure ridges, which, however, may be due to contraction. In addition, the sponge is provided with small scat- tered verruciform up- wardly directed eleva- tions; these are some- times fairly numerous on the upper margins of the more flattened upgrowths, but, generally speaking, their occurrence is irre- gular and it is not certain that they are a constant feature. The colour of the sponge is yellowish- Fig. 23—Spirastrella alcyonioides. grey. a Tylostyle. 4 Ditto. (basal ex- The precise arrange- ‘emity). b Spiraster. ment of the skeleton is not apparent in the present condition of the specimens owing to the distortion which it has undergone, consequent upon drying. It is only possible to refer in general terms to its main features (e.g., as exhibited in longitudinal section of a ~ 126 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. digitiform terminal). Such a section, in general, shows one or two main or oscular canals cut longitudinally, and a spicular skeleton which is, for the most part, of a diffuse type, without any definite aggregation of spicules into fibres. It 1s traversed, however, by a few broad ‘‘columns”’ of rather closely packed parallel spicules, somewhat resembling the ‘‘axial condensa- tions’’ of certain Axinellids. Some of these run longitudinally, whilst others are cut transversely. Another feature, perhaps deserving of note, is the occurrence of numerous longitudinal pale brownish-coloured streaks, the appearance of which is somewhat suggestive of spongin. These streaks are absent from the columnar spicule-tracts. Megascleres.—Vhe megascleres are straight cylindrical tylo- styli of a single kind, with strongylote distal extremity ; size, 400-440 X 4-5 Ht. Microscleres.—The spirasters are fairly straight spicules, provided with twenty to thirty large spines, which are about 7 w in length. ‘They are plentifully scattered through the tissues, and form a dense superficial layer 100 to 200 yt in thickness; the size of the largest is about 4o x 7 pL. Loc.—East coast of Queensland, twenty-five miles south- east of Double Island Point, 33 fms. (‘‘Endeavour.’’) SPIRASTRELLA PAPILLOSA, Ridley and Dendy. 1887. Spirastrella papillosa, Ridley and Dendy, ‘‘Challenger’ Monaxonida, 1887, p. 232, pl. xli., fig. 5, pl. xlv., figs. rishi ag The Museum collection contains six speciments of this species. They vary considerably in shape, but are always provided with several large apically situated oscula, and in other respects agree exactly with the description of the type, except that they do not show any sign of “‘deep longitudinal wrinkles’? near the apex. The warty appearance of the sur- face appears to be a constant character. Locs.—Shoalhaven Bight, New South Wales, 15-45 fms. (““Eendeavour’’); Port Jackson, New South Wales, 30-35 fms. (‘‘Challenger’’); Port Jackson, New South Wales, and Port Phillip, Victoria (Austr. Mus. Coll.). ’ Genus LatrRuNcULIA, Bocage. LATRUNCULIA CONULOSA, Sp. nov. (Plate xxii., fig. 1, and fig. 24.) Sponge submassive, sessile, with aculeated surface. Consistency and texture dense, somewhat rubber-like. No oscula. Surface glabrous, dotted with minute pore- groups. Main skeleton a reticulation of strongly- SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 127 developed, stout fibres composed of styli. Surface conuli, each forming the centre of a radiate system of slender fibres. There is a dermal layer of discasters of the larger kind. Megascles:—Blunt-pointed styli 365 x 11 yp, together with a few (probably immature) sharp-pointed, slenderer spicules which attain an equal length. Micro- scleres :—Dtiscasters of two kinds, of which the larger form a superficial layer and a packing round the main fibres, and are also scattered through the ground sub- stance along with the smaller. The larger are provided with simple spines, the smaller often with compound spines, the spines in both cases being arranged in four whorls, two at either end. The single specimen consists of a sessile, submassive, erect, cylindrical main portion, together with a similar but smaller upgrowth which arises partly from the substratum in con- tinuity with the base of the former and partly from its side. The main trunk is 70 mm. in height, and 30 mm. in diameter. The surface, which is smooth and glabrous, is provided with numerous spine-like conuli, 1 to 3 mm. in height. There are no oscula. The surface is closely dotted with minute pore areas, about .2 mm. in diameter, and each with two to four pores. The texture is dense and com- pact, the consistency firm and fairly tough; in both respects the sponge is somewhat suggestive of india-rubber, although, of Course) NOt «So 4 /Gense, homogeneous or elastic. ' : : 1 1 : ' ' ' 1a 1 | ! ; 1 : ! i} \ ' 1 | 1 ! ' | > Oe ’ The colour (in spirits) is pale brownish-grey. j The main skeleton conr- i sists of a very loose reti- culation of stout fibres (up to 4oo mm. or more in Fig. 24—Latrunculia conulosa. a thickness) which are com-_ Styli. b Larger discaster. c Smaller posed solely of densely discasters. packed parallel _ styli. Each surface-conulus forms the apex of a convergent pencil of fibres, of which the axial or principal fibre only is derived from the main skeletal reticulation, whilst the remainder— which are very much slenderer fibres—both begin and termin- ate at the surface. Probably it would be more correct to say 128 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. of the latter, that they proceed from the apex of the conulus, and after running inwards, with gradually increasing diver- gence, for a short distance towards the sponge-interior, gradually curve round and return again to meet the surface at varying distances from their starting point—-the more cen- trally situated fibres of the pencil proceeding to a further distance than the more peripheral. Styli similar to those com- posing the fibres are sparingly scattered through the tissues together with discasters of two kinds, a larger and a smaller. The former are closely aggregated in the immediate surround- ing of all the main fibres encircling them as a kind of loose sheath. The cortical skeleton is a layer of closely packed discasters almost exclusively of the larger kind; it is about 300 to 400 p in thickness. Megascleres.—These are styli, probably of a single kind— the stouter with a more or less blunt or rounded distal ex- tremity, and occasionally becoming almost perfectly stron- gylote; the slenderest usually sharply pointed. They are sometimes elongately subtylote at the basal end, and have a maximum size of 365 x II w. Microscleres.—(i.) The larger discasters are stout spicules, having a short central region devoid of spines, and on either side of this two more or less distinct whorls of large spines: those of the terminal whorl projecting obliquely forwards; those of the sub-terminal, stand- ing more or less perpendicularly to the spicule-axis. They are about 40 ye in length (exclusive of spines), and have a diameter in their spineless central region of about 12 yt. The spines are 10 to 12 4 long. (ii.) The smaller discasters are very variable in form, no two apparently being quite alike. They are much slenderer spicules than the preceding, with an elon- gated spineless central region, and at either end, two more or less distinct whorls of simple or (more usually) compound spines, the latter of which are columnar in form, with a few terminal spinules. The terminal whorl of spines is often reduced and then appears as a prolongation of the axis of the spicule. These spicules are at most 38 yw in length (inclusive of spines), and have a diameter centrally of 1 to 4 4 (rarely more than 2.5 #4). The stouter individuals may represent a third kind of discaster intermediate between the other two. Loc.—North coast of Tasmania, off Devonport. (‘‘En- deavour.’’) SPONGES. -HALLMANN. 129 Famity POLYMASTIID. Genus PotymastTiA, Bowerbank. POLYMASTIA CRATICIA, Sp. nov. (Plate xxii., fig. 3, and fie. 25. ) Sponge depressed dome-shaped, sessile, with thick- walled digitiform tubular processes some of which are provided with a single apical osculum. Main skeleton consisting of a fairly dense matrix of scattered spicules and spicule bundles traversed vertically by fairly stout distant fibres. The fibres lying immediately beneath the cortex of the processes comprise an outer series of wavy fibres running circumferentially and forming an elegant wickerwork, and of an underlying series of equidistant longitudinal fibres. The cortex consists of styli arranged in a dense palisade. Spicules :—These are of three kinds, viz., fusiform styli of two orders of size which (par- ticularly the larger) are scarcely distinguishable from oxea, the larger occurring in the main skeleton, the smaller in the cortex; and fusiform tylostyli which occur along with the larger styli scattered through the ground tissues. The first attain a size of 1200 x 22 p; the second, 350 x 9 p; and the last, 200 x 5 u. The sponge is sub-circular in horizontal! outline, broadest at the base, with a convex upper surface from which numerous longer or shorter stout digititorm processes arise. Of four specimens, the two which differ most in their proportions are respectively 55 x 80 x 50 mm., and.40 x-90 x 75 mm. in aeight, length and breadth. These two also differ most in the lengths of their processes, which in the former are never more than 10 mm. long, in the latter usually between 15 and 30 mm. The processes are usually tapered to a point and vary from 60 to 80 in number. When, as sometimes is the case, they are cylindrical and distally rounded, the osculum, if it occurs, is situated on the summit of a small terminal papilla. The specimens are preserved in a dry state, and the follow- ing remarks therefore apply to the sponge in that condition. The surface is quite smooth to the touch but has a minutely velvety appearance due to the slightly projecting points of the densely crowded cortical spicules. Internally the sponge con- sists of a dense, but rather soft and friable matrix traversed vertically by fibres about 250 yt in stoutness. The fibres are composed solely of closely packed spicules of the largest kind, which are fusiform styli closely resembling oxea; the matrix consists of a disorderly profusion of spicule-bundles and single 130 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. spicules of the same kind together with smaller tylostyli. The cortical skeleton proper consists of crowded fusiform sub- styli arranged perpendicularly to the surface, but immediately beneath and closely associated with it is a_ thin matted layer of mostly horizontally dis- posed styli of the larger kind. Fibres from the inner skeleton penetrate intO the cortex, spreading out slightly at their extremities in a penicillate fashion ; the terminal spicules of these fibres usually project slightly at the surface. The arrangement of the fibres imme- diately underlying the cortex is one of marked regularity. In the body of the sponge, a series of equidistant parallel fibres running upwards from the base is most conspicuous, but in the processes, a series of circumferentially directed a b c : : fibres external to these also comes into prominence. The latter run undulat- ingly and intercross so as to form a wickerwork-like structure of very ele- gant pattern. The specific name has been bestowed in reference to this feature. Spicules.— (i.) The larger oxea-like styli are straight, and measure 660- 1200 °X 12-22 4l. di.) The smaller are usually slightly curved and more distinctly stylote ; they range in size from 220.16 tO 250! X Oye: (iii.) The tylostyli (or subtylostyli) are fusiform and _ usually slightly curved. They occur singly and in small bundles in Fig. 25— P. craticia. the ground substance. Size: a Stylus (of the fibres). 120 X%) 3 tO 200 X* 5 4g: b Stylus (of the cortex, drawn to a larger scale ,.._ ~=s North coast of New South than the preceding). ¢ Tylostylus (of the Wales, eight miles east of Sandon cortex). Bluffs, 35-40 fms. (‘‘Endeavour.’’) SPONGES.—HALLMANN. I 31 FaMIty ASTRAXINELLIDA, Dendy. Dendy! has suggested the advisability of instituting a new family—Astraxinellidea—for the reception of certain Axinel- lide which are distinguished by the possession of ‘astrose microscleres. The Astraxinellida he would place in the divi- sion Astromonaxonellida, whilst the Axinellide in the restricted sense would remain in the Sigmatomonaxonellida. If we could learn all the facts concerning the phylogeny of the Axinellidze it would no doubt be found that, whereas some have been evolved from Desmacidonid and Haplosclerid ancestors and some (? e.g., Tvachycladus*) directly from more primitive sigmatophorous forms, yet a considerable number have developed along lines of descent which diverge from the Astrotetraxonid stem. In a natural system of classification the last-mentioned would be excluded from the Sigmatomon- axellida, and they would probably require several families for their reception. Unfortunately, it is impossible in the present state of our knowledge to determine, in the majority of cases, to which of the two primary Tetraxonid subdivisions a given Axinellid genus belongs, and consequently no altogether satisfactory bipartition of the family is to be expected without much further enquiry. Nevertheless, there is much to be said in favor of a removal forthwith from the Axinellidz of such genera as afford sufficient evidence of their Astrotetraxonid affinities; and these might very well be placed provisionally in a single family, irrespective of any question as to whether their relationships are close or distant. On this understanding I feel but slight hesitation in placing under the family Astrax- inellidzee the new genus Paracordyla, which possesses an Axin- ellid type of skeletal structure and yet has microscleres in the form of amphiasters. 1 Dendy—Rept. Pearl Oyster Fisheries, Gulf of Manaar, with Rept. Mar. Biol. Ceylon, Part 3, 1905, p. 107. 2 In this connection, I would suggest that a new family—Spirasigmide —be established to include Trachya globosa, Carter (Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 5, Xvii., 1886, p. 121), and its variety, rugosa (Op. cit., xviii. 1886, p. 457), Gellius aculeatus, Whitelegge (Sponges of Funafuti, Austr. Mus. Mem., iii., 5, 1897, p. 326), and perhaps also the genus Tvachycladus. For the first- mentioned of these species Topsent (Mém. Soc. Zool. France, vii., 1894, p. 8), has already proposed the genus Trachygellius; for the second I now propose a new genus Spirasigma. In both of these genera the micro- scleres resemble the sigmaspires of Trachycladus more closely than they resemble ordinary sigmata, and the conformation of the skeleton is strongly suggestive of their derivation from the Tetillidz. Of these species I have examined (only) sections which were prepared by Mr. Whitelegge—those of TJ. globosa and its variety having been cut from pieces of British Museum specimens, and that of the latter from its type- specimen. If the former sections are correctly labelled—and I scarcely doubt that they are—T. globosa and T.globosa, var. rugosa are specifically distinct. Both in Trachygellius and Spirasigma the skeleton has a radial arrangement recalling that of the Donatiide. In the former the large diactinal spicules (oxea in the two known species) are accompanied by sigmata only; in the latter (in which, in the single species, the large 1g2 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. GENUS PARACORDYLA, gen. nov. The inner skeleton is a dense columnar aggregation of large oxea which, in linear outgrowths of the sponge- body (if these be present), takes the form of a very com- pact axial core. Spongin appears to be wholly absent. The ectosomal skeleton is a dense palisade of vertical microxea supplemented by ‘‘dermal brushes’’ of styli or oxea. Between the ectosomal layer and the inner skeleton-mass is a narrow zone penetrated by canals and crossed by strands of the large oxea. In addition to microxea, microscleres in the form of small amphiasters are present. The spiculation of this genus is remarkably similar to that of Scolopes moseleyi, Sollas ;1 but since Sollas speaks of fibres in connection with his species, and remarks that the general character of its skeleton reminds one forcibly of that in Carter’s genus T'rachya, there is evidently a distinct generic difference between Paracordyla and Scolopes. Amongst the Axinellida, the genus which makes the nearest approach to Paracordyla, appears to be Ceratopsis, Thiele.? PARACORDYLA LIGNEA, Sp. nov. (Plate xxi, fig? 2, sandies: 26, 27.) Sponge sessile, with a massive body from which branch-like elongations may arise. Consistency, owing to the enormous development of the spicules, very dense and solid. Surface even, pilose. Oscula wanting. The skeleton of the whole of the inner mass of the sponge to within a few millimetres of the surface is formed of closely aggregated large oxea, with a general parallel arrange- ment, which, in the branch-like parts, form an almost solid core. Between the core and the superficial layer (cortex) is a narrow gone, 2 to 3 mm. wide, crossed by strands of similar oxea, the outer spicules of which pro- ject well beyond the surface. The surface is also pro- tected by brushes of shorter spicules varying in form from styl to oxea. The canals of the subcortical sone are surrounded by radially disposed microxea, and similar spicules, together with minute amphiasters, are scattered through the ground substance. Megascleres :—(i.) Oxea of the main skeleton reaching a size of 3200 x 50 jt; (i.) styli and asymmetrical oxea of the dermal brushes vary- ee in length from less than 200 to about 7oo qt, with spicules of the fibres are substrongyla) there are in addition scattered small oxea. If in Spirasigma aculeata the fibre-forming strongyla dis- appeared, the species would, without doubt, owing to the mode of dis- LYE of its smaller oxea, be classed as a Gellius. i Sollas—‘‘Challenger’”’ Tetraxonida, 1885, p. 432, pl. xliii., figs. 1-9. 2 Thiele—Studien uber pazifische spongien, Zoologica, Heft 24, 1898, p. 56. SPONGES.—HALLMANN. G3 maximum diameter of 18 jp. Microscleres :—(t.) Mi- croxea, 100 to 140 # in length by about 4 w in diameter; (ii.) amphiasters, 4 to 5 jt long. The single specimen is a moderately large, massive, sessile sponge, of great density and solidity, with a rounded cuboidal or sub-globose body which measures about 120 mm. in each of its three principal directions. From the marginal region of the somewhat flat- tened upper surface of the main body there are given off, at sub-equal dis- tances, three stout branch-like pro- cesses, 100 to 150 mm. in length. One of these is cylindrical, the others are club-shaped and are polytomously divided at their extremities into in- cipient branches. The specimen, which has been longitudinally bisected, 1s, with the exception of one of its processes, preserved in a dry state. The contrac- tion resulting from drying has caused the surface to split in places, giving rise to a number of shallow gaping fissures, such as are occasioned under similar circumstances in many Axinellids. The surface of the dried portion somewhat resembles short-piled velvet, both in appearance and to the touch; that of the spirit piece has a harsher feeling. The colour of the former is yellowish- white, both externally and internally ; the latter is similarly tinted, except superficially, where to a depth of about one-third of a millimetre, it exhibits an intense purple colouration which, how- ever, is almost certainly a stain derived from crinoids originally preserved in the same liquid. The texture, as revealed by the cut surface resulting from the bisection of the specimen, bears a close resemblance to that of some coarse and exceedingly short-grained hardwood. The densely packed spicules are visible to the naked eye, and throughout the entire central mass of the sponge have ' ! I ! ' i] i} | { \ ! \ \ ( ; ; \ i} U i i \ ( @ y ‘ b ' J 1 1 ‘ ! sy / 1 i) a / ! 1 ! \ ) | 1 ' | |" Bis, 26—P. henea- a Oxea (showing the spicule’s extremities.and its diameter relatively to that of the other spicules). b Styli (of the dermal brushes). c¢ Microxea. ' 134 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. an approximately parallel arrangement. (The general struc- ture and arrangement of the skeleton were examined micro- scopically only in the branch-like processes; the following description is drawn from a rather thick median longitudinal section of one of such preserved in alcohol. Owing to the great development of spicules and their disposition, the pre- paration of a transverse section would be wholly impossible without desilicification. The structure of the main body of the sponge is apparently not essentially different from that described for the processes). Fig. 27—Faracordylalignea. Vertical section, show- ing the arrangement of the skeleton in the cortical and subcortical region. Superficially, there is a fairly well-defined layer, about 150 in thickness, densely packed with perpendicular microxea which appear to project about half their length beyond the surface. In addition, the surface is provided with brushes of fusiform styli and oxea, of much shorter length than the spicules composing the main skeleton. The components of a single bundle diverge from a point close beneath the cortex. With the exception of a sub-cortical zone about two or three millimetres wide the whole of the interior of the branch-like process is occupied by an almost solid core of longitudinally- SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 135 disposed large oxea. The sub-cortical zone is crossed at close intervals by slightly penicillate fascicles of similar spicules, which give support to the cortical layer. The innermost spicules of these bundles emerge from between the spicules of the core; the outermost project for a considerable distance beyond the surface. ‘There are thus three orders of projecting spicules at the surface. The inter-fascicular spaces of the subcortical zone are filled-in with soft tissues containing scattered spicules and traversed by canals which in cross- section show a circular outline and a surrounding whorl of radially-disposed microxea. The largest canals occur in the deeper parts of the zone, and may attain a diameter of .6 mm. In the immediate neighbourhood of the cortex, the canals are of capillary dimensions, and the microxea-—which presumably surround them—are so closely and confusedly intermingled, that the precise inner limit of the cortex 1s very often difficult of determination. Megascleres.— (i.) The oxea of the inner skeleton are straight or only slightly curved symmetrical fusiform spicules attain- ing a size of 3200 x 50 #. They are usually much more than 1000 # long, but spicules of all lengths between these larger oxea and the dermal oxea occur, and (since the asymmetry of the latter is sometimes in- appreciable) c consequently no actual lower limit can be assigned to their size. Abnormalities of these spicules in the shape of styli of only about one-half their length are of extremely rare occurrence. (ii.) The fusiform styli and (usually asymmetrical) oxea, which form the dermal brushes and are also to be found in small number scattered in the subcortical zone, range in length from somewhat less than 200 to slightly more than 700 jt; the largest may attain a diameter of 18 po All maceereciatel grades ‘of form between styli and oxea occur. Microscleres.— (i.) The microxea are similar in form to the largest oxea, but are about twice as stout in proportion to their length. They are rarely less than 100 #, or more than 140 jt long, and attain a diameter of slightly more than 4 #. Occasionally spicules intermediate in size between these and the shortest dermal oxea are met with, but appear to belong rather to the latter category. 136 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. (it.) The amphiasters! bear at either end a terminal whorl of about six to eight rays which stand almost perpen- dicularly to the shaft or are directed forwards at a small angie (up to 30°, say). The width of the spicule, between the tips of the rays, measures from about three-fourths of, to slightly less than the length of the spicule, which is rarely as much as«5 yp. Loc.—Coast of New South Wales, eight miles east of San- ic ’ don Bluffs, 35-40 fms. (‘‘Endeavour.’’) Famity DESMACIDONID-. Whether the Desmacidonide be divided into two sub- families, Mycalinee and Ectyonine, in the usual way; or whether, in accordance with Topsent’s proposal, the Myca- linee be sub-divided so as to yield an additional sub-family, the Dendoricine—the result, if a natural grouping of the genera be our aim, is not altogether satisfactory. Of the two, Top- sent’s classification is the better since, with very few excep- tions as their microscleres show, the genera which remain in the Mycaline after the removal of the Dendoricine stand well apart from the rest of the family. The main fault lies in the artificiality of the distinction upon which the separation of the Ectyonine and Dendoricine is based. Species are placed in one or the other of these sub-families according as spicules of one particular kind—the accessory spicules—are present or absent, whilst no value at all is placed upon the presence or absence of the equally important ‘‘skeletal’’ and ‘‘dermal’’ spicules, nor any notice taken of the plain indications afforded by the microscleres. As a consequence, we have closely allied if not almost identical genera like Ectyodoryx and Lissoden- doryx, Ectyomyxilla and Myxilla, Pocillon and lophon, Hyme- trochota and Iotrochota placed, the one in the Ectyonine, the other in the Dendoricine, whilst on the other hand wholly un- related species like those of Vilsonella and Clathria are put in a single genus without question or comment. Under these circumstances there is no advantage in maintaining these sub- divisions, and I propose therefore to merge the Dendoricin:e and Ectyonine in a single sub-family, to be called the Myxil- line. It is probable that the Myxillinge are capable of sub- division into two fairly natural groups in the way suggested below, but on this question I prefer to reserve judgment. I would, however, venture the opinion that the Myxilline are derived from a single stem distinct from that from which the great majority of the Mycaline have sprung, and from this point of view will enter upon a brief discussion of the sub- family. 1 Not having succeeded in making out the details of the structure of this spicule, I have not attempted to figure it. The rays appear to be often bifureate and to have at times a slightly tuberculated surface. SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 137 SUB-FAMILY MYXILLINAE. _ the preponderance of evidence is in favour of the supposi- tion that the most primitive Myxilline possessed a type of organisation closely resembling that which obtains in certain existing genera such as Leptosia, Hymenancora, Hymetro- chota and Hymeraphia ; and it is possible, in accordance there- with, to imagine a common ancestral form, or hypothetical ‘*Promyxilline,’’ characterised by the following features :—The sponge grew in the form of a thin encrustment, and produced in contact with the substratum a basal layer of spongin echi- nated by erect acanthostylote spicules which acted as pillars for the support of the soft structures. These spicules (which for convenience will be termed the basical megascleres) ex- hibited a tendency to differentiate into two kinds, a less spiny larger, and a more spiny smaller kind, and this was probably associated with an accompanying tendency towards an ar- rangement of the spicules in clusters, in each of which larger individuals were surrounded by smaller. Megascleres of a second kind, smooth and probably monactinal, were also present, these (which may be distinguished as auxiliary} megascleres) occurred, without definite arrangement, more particularly in the superficial layers of the sponge, and also formed descending strands stretching towards the sponge- base. Sponginous fibres were not produced, but the pri- mordia of such, in the form of low dome-shaped elevations of the basal spongin lamina, coinciding in position with the areas occupied by the spicule-clusters, had probably made their appearance. It is diffcult to say what the microscleres were, but since cheloids, sigmata, toxa and rhaphides (often in drag- mata) are found in the group, it is necessary to assume that these, or at least the forms from which they have been derived, were present. From such a hypothetical form all the different types of Myxillinee are capable of being derived. The evidence afforded by the microscleres, considered in conjunction with other facts, indicates either that a consider- able amount of evolution in various directions had been ac- complished, and that the prototypes of quite a number of different groups of co-related genera had already come into existence prior to the origin of sponginous fibres and to the 1 These spicules are commonly known as “dermal” or ‘“ectosomal”’ megascleres: but the part which they play in the conformation of the skeleton varies to such an extent in different genera that it is advisable in a comparative treatment to designate them by a term unsuggestive of position or function. The term “auxiliary” is not altogether an appro- priate one, but it will suit the present purpose; the spicules to which it applies correspond for the most part, in the Myxilline, to the megascleres which Bowerbank included under the same name. I shall apply the epithet “dermal’’ only to those spicules, of whatever category, which are specially concerned in the formation of a dermal skeleton. 138 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. assumption of an erect habit of growth, or that a return to a primitive condition on the part of more or less highly evolved species has occurred again and again within the group; other- wise it is ee to account for the existence of groups of gener Hymeraphia, Microciona, Clathria and Ophlita- eine oa Stylostichon, Ectyodoryx and Lissoden- doryx; Hymenancora, Plumohalichondria, Ectyomyxilla and Myxilla; Dragmatyle, Tedania and Acheliderma ; and others— each of which comprises a natural series connecting ‘‘promyx- illine’’ with Ectyonine and Dendoricine forms. Whilst it is probable that each of the two possible explanations contains some portion of the truth, it would seem that the former is more satisfactorily in accord with the bulk of the evidence, although it involves the assumption that, amongst the Myxil- linge, sponginous fibres have originated independently many times over. If, however, as is scarcely to be doubted, such fibres have arisen as linear upgrowths of the basal spongin- lamina, there is no great improbability in such an assumption provided that there already existed in the common ancestor an incipient tendency, such as has been postulated, towards fibre- formation. Taking into account only those features which belong to the skeleton, but neglecting, for the time being, any considerations in reference to the microscleres, it may be said that nearly all of the diversities of spiculation and structure which occur in the Myxilline are ascribable to (a) modifications in the form of the megascleres and the division of either or both of the origi- nal groups of megascleres into two or more kinds; (b) differences in the arrangement and constitution of the fibres, and in connection therewith different combinations of the megascleres in respect to their particular location in the skele- ton; or (c) the loss by atrophy of one or more groups of megas- cleres formerly present. Of very common occurrence has been the differentiation of the basical megascleres into two kinds, a larger, in the case of which the primitive spination has usually undergone partial reduction or become entirely lost, and a smaller, in which it has almost invariably been retained; these may be distinguished as principal and accessory basical megascleres respectively, or simply as ‘“principals”’ and ‘‘accessories.’’ The resultant tri- megascleric condition 1 is that which is characteristic of normal ‘‘Ectyonine.’’ In many Myxillina, however, the ‘‘basicals’’ are only incompletely differentiated and in such cases, unless (as in Crella) there be a determinable difference of function between the spicules which lie at one end of the series and those which lie at the other, it is difficult to decide whether they should be regarded as belonging to one or to two groups. (e.g g. species of Stylostichon, Clathrissa, etc. ). The maximum SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 139 degree of differentiation between principal and accessory spic- ules appears to have been attained in genera like Raspailia and Echinodictyum and in those in which the microscleres are isochelze palmate and toxa, though amongst the last-men- tioned there are species (vide Clathria caelata, sp. n.) in which an unbroken transition of spicule forms occurs between the small echinating spined ‘‘accessories’’ and the large (often quite smooth) principal styli of the fibre-core. Finally, in a third group of genera, comprising the ‘‘Dendoricine’’ and certain ‘‘Ectyonine’’ (e.g., Ophlitaspongia, Echinoclathria, Wilsonella, Agelas, etc.) the basical spicules are unequivocally of but a single kind. The iogical conclusion with regard to these is that either a differentiation of their basical spicules has never occurred or that one or the other of the resultants of such a differentiation has subsequently disappeared in the course of evolution; in most cases, the probability is that the absence of a second kind is due to loss, inasmuch as the (basical) spicules actually present, usually exhibit, in the matter of form and function, features which are more characteristic either of prin- cipal megascleres or of accessory. The further consideration of the spicules renders it necessary to take into account other features of the skeleton, and particularly the fibres. In the Myxillinz skeletal fibres have originated in apparently two quite independent ways, viz., by the upgrowth of processes from the basal lamina, and by the ‘‘ingrowth’’ of strands of auxiliary spicules from the superficial layer. In many cases, however, the fibres are the product of both modes of forma- tion. Fibres which are wholly or partly of basal origin are, with possible exceptions, more or less sponginous and traverse the whole extent of the sponge; those of purely superficial origin are, at the most, scantily proy ided with spongin and proceed from the surface (usually?) only for a short distance (as, for example in ‘‘Echinodictyum”’ arenosum, *“‘ Plumohali- chondria’ gravida and Fusifer fistulatus).1| The former might be distinguished as basifugal, the latter as basipetal fibres. The mode of origination of basifugal fibres in the Myxillinee is capable of being explained as follows :—The spongoblasts (and probably also the ‘“‘basical’’ scleroblasts) which primi- tively—it may be presumed—were uniformly distributed over the surface of the basal lamina, became at particular points on it more closely aggregated. The consequent more rapid de- position of spongin at these points produced at each of them a thickening of the lamina which gradually assumed the form, say, of a papilla. Scattered over the surface of this papilla, just as over other portions of the surface of the lamina, though perhaps more closely, were scleroblasts 1 Dendy—Proc. Roy. Soc. Victoria, ix. (n.s.), 1897. 140 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. producing echinatingly-disposed basical megascleres. As a final step the cells, which, by their proliferation, main- tain the supply of spongoblasts and scleroblasts, became localised at the extremity of the papilla, the further growth of which was thereby limited to increase in length. The manner of growth of the fibre might accordingly be likened to that of a Phanerogam stem—the spongoblast- and scleroblast-produc- ing cells of the former corresponding to the apical meriste- matic cells of the latter, and the spicules, like the leaves, developing in acropetal succession. Thus at every stage of growth the fibre would be surmounted at its extremity by a “tuft?” of newly-formed basical spicules, and it would depend almost solely upon the initial orientation of these spicules with regard to the direction of growth of the fibre, and their precise location (whether at the extreme tip of the fibre or subtermin- ally) whether they subsequently became wholly enveloped by the onwardly developing spongin as coring spicules or whether, being more or less perpendicularly disposed, they were left with only their bases imbedded in spongin, as echinating spi- cules. When the fibre- forming spicules are of a single kind the attempt to draw a distinction between coring and echinat- ing spicules is, to a great extent, artificial, and usually breaks down in practice ; as a matter of fact the spicules at the time of their formation at the growing-point of the fibre are, in a sense, all of them echinating. Accordingly Ophlitaspongia and Echinoclathria which, by common agreement, were placed in the ‘‘Ectyoninz,’’ should logically have been included in the “Dendoricine.”’ The foregoing remarks concerning the mode of origin and formation of basifugal fibres apply more particularly to those of which the constituent spicules are basical megascleres only. Although fibres of this kind are the rule, there are a number of genera in which auxiliary spicules also participate in their formation and some again in which these are the only fibre- forming spicules. In these exceptional cases we may consider either that the ascending sponginous fibres have come into association with, and have enveloped in their progress the ‘“descending’’ (basipetal) strands of auxiliary spicules ;1 or that in connection with the formation of the fibres, ‘‘auxiliary’’ scleroblasts have come to take a regular place amongst the cells of the fibre-growing point. From the point of view of spicular constitution merely, the skeletal fibres of the Myxil- linze are referable to three main types, according as basical megascleres only, basical and auxiliary both, or auxiliary megascleres only, take part in their formation. 1 In Aulosnongus tubulatus, Bowbk. (Proc. Zool. Soc., 1873, p. 29; Dendy, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (6), iii., 1889, p. 29). the fibres appear to grow up in an analagous way around the tubes of commensal worms. SPONGES.--HALLMANN. 141 This introduces an interesting point in connection with the megascleres, viz., their versatility in respect to the different parts they play 1 in different genera in the conformation of the skeleton ; and it also raises ihe question as to the nature of the criteria at our disposal for determining, in a given species, to which category—principal, accessory or auxiliary—the megas- cleres of each kind belong. According to my interpretation, if we take into account only the siimanon of the megascleres, the following types of skeleton are, amongst others, dis- tinguishable :-— I.—The spicules of the fibres are ‘‘basicals’’ of one or two kinds; the ‘‘auxiliaries,”’ if (as is almost invariably the case) present, occur interstitially and dermally. (a) The ‘‘basicals’’ are of two kinds, both of which occur in connection with the fibres. (1.) The fibres are cored by ‘‘principals’’ and echinated by “‘accessories.’’ Normal ‘‘Ectyonine.’’ (ii.) Both kinds of ‘‘basicals’’? are longitudinally dis- posed in the fibres. ‘‘Clathria’’ chartacea’ (vide remarks on Clathria); Heteroclathria. (b) The ‘‘basicals’’ are scarcely or not at all differentiated into two groups, and echinating spicules, if present, are not distinguishable in form from the directive spicules ; or either the one kind’ or the other of the ‘‘principal’’ and ‘‘acces- sory’’ groups has been lost by atrophy. (iii.) The ‘‘basicals’’ are imperfectly differentiated. Stylostichon. (iv.) ‘‘Accessories’’ are absent. Normal ‘‘Dendori- cinee,’’ Ophlitaspongia, Echinoclathria. (iio *Rrmeipals’* are. absent) > Clathia’*- mollis,1 Paramyxilla infrequens.? I].—The spicules composing the fibres comprise both “‘basi- cals’’ and ‘‘auxiliaries ;’’ the latter, which are situated axially in the fibres also occur interstitially or dermally. vi.) Principal and accessory spicules are well distin- . P . a . . guished, and both kinds are associated with the fibres. ‘‘Echinodictyum’’ ridleyi (p. 151). 1 Kirkpatrick—Marine Investigations in South Africa, ii., 1904, p. 249. 2 Carter—Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (5), vii., 1881, 369; Dendy—Report Pearl Oyster Fisheries, Gulf of Manaar, iii., 1505, Dancoos 142 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. (vil.) Principal and accessory spicules are more or less well distinguished; the former echinate the fibres, the latter are interstitial and dermal. Crella. (vil.) The ‘‘basicals’’ are scarcely or not at all differ- entiated into two kinds or are represented only by accessory spicules. Clathrissa, Plumohalichondria, Stylotellopsis, Wilsonella, Fusifer, ‘‘Echino- dictyum’’ spongiosum,} ‘‘E.”’ arenosum,! ‘‘Micro- ciona’’ scabida (p. 150). (ix.) The ‘‘basicals’’ are represented only by principal spicules. Echinochalina. III.—The fibre-forming spicules are ‘‘auxiliaries’’ only ; basical spicules, if present, are (so far as known) of a single kind, and, on account of their spination, appear to belong rather to the category of accessory than of principal mega- scleres. (x.) Basical megascleres are present. Pseudoclathria Grayella, Histodermella, Microtylotella. (xi.) Auxiliary megascleres only are present. Species ot lotrochota and Melonanchora, and certain species included in the Mycaline. In the case of those Myxillinze in which the megascleres are of three kinds, the homologies of the spicules are, as a rule, obvious ; and almost invariably it is found that the directive or axial spicules of the fibres belong to the principal, the echinat- ing spicules to the accessory, and the interstitial or dermal to the auxiliary category of megascleres. When this mode of arrangement of the spicules obtains, or when it is departed from only through the loss of accessory spicules, the skeleton might be described as being of the normal type, since it is that in particular which is characteristic of most Myxilline. Amongst “‘trimegascleric’’ genera, Crella is exceptional in the fact that in it the fibres are cored by auxiliary and echinated by principal megascleres whilst the accessory occur extra-fibrally. From a study of the different forms assumed by the spicules (both megascleres and microscleres) amongst the normal Myx- illinaze, we obtain much information which is of service in enabling us to form a conclusion concerning the identity of the megascleres in cases where the skeleton is of an anomalous or aberrant type. Thus there can be absolutely no doubt that the ‘skeletal’? spicules of Melonanchora emphysema, Forcepia 1 Dendy—Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict., viii., 1896, p. 50. SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 143 colonensis,1 Iotrochota coccinea? and of other species which might be mentioned, are auxiliary megascleres, and that they therefore differ from normal species of their respective genera in the absence of principal megascleres ; and since we are en- abled to detect the relationships of these species only by reason of the marked peculiarities of their microscleres, it is extremely probable that a number of the species included in certain My- caline genera (e.g., Desmacidon, Amphilectus, Esperiopsis and Batzella) are similarly derived from various Myxillinee which are lacking in striking microscleric characters. Further, one feels scarcely any hesitation in asserting that the dermal spi- cules of Pseudociathria, Crella and Grayella, and the scattered spined diactinal spicules of Histodermella, are accessory or, at any rate, undifferentiated basical megascleres; whilst the peculiar forms assumed by the accessory spicules in certain species of Acarnus, e.g., by the ‘‘cladotylostyles”’ of A. tortilis$ and the cladotylota of A. tenuis4 lead one to suspect that the microtylota of Microtylotella giintheri belong to the same cate- gory, and that this genus ought therefore to be given a place in the vicinity of Acarnus. Also, it is not altogether improb- able that the spined forcipes of Leptobasts and Forcepia are derivatives of accessory megascleres; the larger forcipes of L. arcuata® are especially suggestive of such a derivation, and it is worthy of notice also that in the genera Crella, Gray- ella and Histodermella, which, like Forcepia and Leptobasts, possess chelze arcuate, the scattered accessory spicules are frequently curved and diactinal. If the megascleres other than the accessory are of a single kind only, it is not always pos- sible to decide with certainty whether they are principal or auxiliary spicules; as a rule, however, reasons can be found, depending upon their form, in support of their identification with one, rather than with the other, of these categories. Principal megascleres, in nearly all cases in which their identity is certain, are sub-conical or more or less fusiform, somewhat curved styli, which are either quite smooth or are pravided with spines over a greater or less portion of their length ex- tending from the basal extremity upwards. The auxiliary megascleres, on the other hand, are typically straight and of fairly uniform diameter, and are rarely spined except at their extremities ; in comparison with the principal spicules they are of relatively slender proportions, and in most genera are typi- cally diactinal in the fully developed state, with usually tornote, 1 Carter—Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (5), xv., 1885, p. 110. For this species Hentschel (1911) has recently proposed a new name, Ff. Michaelseni. 2 Carter—Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (5), xviii., 1886, p. 378; Dendy—Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict., viii (n.s.), 1896, p. 23. 3 Topsent—Résultats Camp. Scient. Pr. de Monaco, Fasc. xxv., 1904, Vo Als Tolle salir, Gallen 3) 4 Dendy—Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict.. viii., (n.s.), 1896, p. 50. 5 Topsent—Op. cit., p. 183, pl. xv., fig. 18b. 144 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. strongylote or tylote extremities. One is inclined to think, therefore—in regard to those genera included in the Mycalinze which afford reason for believing that they are degraded Myx- illinee—that the megascleres of typical species of Desmacidon and Homeodictya are homologous with principal spicules whilst in some species at least which have been assigned to the same genera and to Amphilectus and Batzella they are homologous with auxiliary megascleres.1 The presence or absence of spination on the principal spicules has been found lacking in generic value, and everything points to the fact that the spined ‘condition is the more primitive; it is perhaps not a rare occurrence in species in which they are smooth when fully mature, that they are spined in their early dev elopmental stages (as, for example, in Myxilla diversiancorata®), or during the larval period of life of the sponge (as in Myxilla pedunculata®). It is a peculiar circumstance that the principal megascleres are almost invariably curved; exceptions to the rule are provided by Raspailia and its allies, but it is significant that these are also aberrant in other respects. In Echinodictyum and Tri- kentrion amongst the ‘‘Ectyonine,’’ and in Dendoricella and some species of other genera (e.g., lotrochota) amongst the ‘‘Dendoricine,’’ they are diactinal (as in Desmacidon and Homeodictya), and take the form of oxea or strongyla; yet they still exhibit the curvature and fusiformity which, in general, are characteristic of principal megascleres. Certain Myxillinae are possessed of more than _ three kinds of megascleres owing to the division of one or more of the primary groups into two kinds; and_ this division usually appears to be correlated with, and to have been the outcome of a performance by the spicules concerned of two different functions. Instances of such, in which the principal megascleres have undergone division, are provided by Echinodictyum clathratum4 and species of Raspailia (e.g., R. ramosa, Mont., and R. tenuis, R. and D.); and in w fren the ‘‘accessories’’ have undergone division by the species of Plo- camia. That the ‘‘dumbbell’’ spicules of the last-named genus are derivatives of the accessory megascleres, the indication afforded by P. plena5 leaves scarcely any room to doubt; and this species also, by reason of its possession of stunted ab- normal forms of the principal megascleres, renders it probable 1 Examples of such are provided by Homeodictya dendyi (Whit.); Des- macidon plicatum (=D. stelliderma, Carter); D. psammodes and Ratzella inaequalis. (Hentschel, Fauna Sudwest- Australiens, Bd. iii., 1911); and by Amphilectus ceratosus, R. and D 2 Lundbeck—Porifera Danish Ingolf-Expedition, Pt. 2, 1905, p. 150. 3 Lundbeck—Loe. cit., p. 149. 4 Dendy—Rept. Pearl Oyster Fisheries, Gulf of Manaar, Pt. 3. 1905, p. 5 Sollas—Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (4). v., p. 44. SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 145 that in P. clopetaria, Schmidt,! with its ‘“‘pegtop-shaped”’ styli we have a species in which there are present two kinds of prin- cipal and two kinds of accessory spicules. The differentiation of the auxiliary megascleres into two groups, as in Rhaphi- dophlus, appears to have occurred but seldom. An interesting point in connection with the microscleres, and one which possesses considerable classificatory importance is the rarity of the occurrence of sigmata and toxa in the same species. ‘i hese two microscleres are found together in certain Mycaline, but not to my knowledge in any species of the Myx- illinee. Furthermore, in the latter sub-family, the microscleres which occur in association with toxa are (except in Ploca- miopsis) isochele palmate, whilst those associated with sig- mata are isochele arcuate, isancore, or rhaphides (usually in dragmata). Thus we have on the one hand the genera Hymeraphia, Microciona, Clathria, Rhaphidolphus, Ophlita- spongia, Echinoclathria, Heteroclathria, Plocamia, Acarnus, Microtylotella, Fusifer, Cornulum, and Artemisina in which the microscleres are toxa and (or) isochele palmate but not sigmata; and, on the other hand, Leptosia, Stylostichon, Ectyodoryx, Lissodendoryx, Clathrissa, Crella, Grayella, Paramyxilla, Forcepia, Leptobasis, Hamigera, Dendoricella, Histodermella, Histoderma, Hymenancora, Myxilla, Ectyo- myxilla and Melonanchora in which the microscleres are sigmata and isochele arculate or isancore with or without trichodragmata, but not toxa. There can scarcely be any doubt that these groups of genera are representative of two distinct lines of evolution in the Myxilline; and since they comprise between them the majority of the species the ques- tion naturally arises as to whether they can be utilised as a basis for the division of the sub-family. The probability is that they can. In the former group, the accessory megascleres, when present, are well distinguished from the principal, and the auxiliary spicules are typically stylote; whereas in the latter, principal and accessory spicules as a rule are not widely different in form, and often graduate insensibly one into the other, and the auxiliary spicules are typically more or less diactinal. This is not only significant in itself, but it provides a means whereby one is enabled to arrive at an opinion con- cerning the allotment of most of the remaining genera. Thus the genera Raspailia and Clathriodendron (and with them Sy- ringella); Echinodictyum, Trikentrion and Cyamon; Aulo- spongus ; and Spanioplon—all of which are lacking in micro- scleres—are evidently to be assigned to the former group; Acheliderma, Tedania and Dragmatyle ; Hymetrochota, Iotro- chota and Amphiastrella ; and perhaps also the somewhat aber- rant lophon and Pocillon—to the latter. To the former group 1 Ridley—Jour. Linn. Soc., Zool., xv., 1881, p. 479. 146 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. also, one is inclined to refer: Mesapos, Tethyspira, Hymer- habdia and Cerbaris (which appear to be lacking in auxiliary megascleres) on account of the analogy which ‘their spicules bear to principal and accessory spicules : Echinochalina, which seems to be related to Echinoclathria; Suberotelites, regarded by Topsent as allied to Plocamia; and the aberrant genus Agelas (including Ectyonopsis) the affinities of which appear to be rather with the toxa-bearing Myxilline. On the other hand, one would assign rather to the latter group: Pseudo- clathria, which presents some analogies with Grayella; Stylo- tellopsis, on account of its resemblance in many respects to Clathrissa; and (necessarily) Tylosigma, because of its sig- mata. A few genera still remain to be accounted for, the position of which is not quite clear; but sufficient has been adduced, I think, to indicate the feasibility of such a subdivision of the Myxilline as has been suggested. It is clearly evident, how- ever, that no wholly satisfactory grouping of the species and genera of the Desmacidonideé can be arrived at, until other characters, in addition to those which the spicules afford, are taken into account in classification. GENUS CLATHRISSA, Lendenfeld. 1888. Clathrissa, Lendenfeld, Descr. Cat. Sponges, Austr. Mus., 1888, p. 217. The genus Clathrissa was introduced by Lendenfeld for three Port Jackson sponges which he named C. arbuscula, C. elegans, and C. pumila respectively; of these, the first mentioned possesses chief claim to be regarded as the type- species, and is here so considered. They were defined as ‘‘Desmacidonide with a skeleton composed of dense bundles of slender oxea with very little spongin, echinated by spined styli.’? Concerning the precise nature of C. elegans, nothing can be said with certainty, since in the existing collection of the Museum, no sponges identifiable as such have so far been met with. An examination of the type-specimens of the other species shows that in both the structure of the main skeleton is similar to that of Plumohalichondria, and that microscleres are present in the form of chelae arcuatae. In C. pumila, however, there is, in addition, a dermal skeleton of acantho- styles, so that this species belongs to the genus Crella. The other, C. arbuscula, agrees essentially w ith many species at present included in Plumohalichondria, viz, those with arcuate chelae. If, however, the microscleres of P. microcionides (the type of Plumohalichondria) be ancore, as Thiele’s figures of the spicules of P. neptunel and his statement concerning the - TMhiele—Archiv. Naturg., 1903, i., Heft 3, p. 387, pl. xxi., fig. 19. SPONGES:-HALLMANN. 147 likelihood of the latter species’ identity with P. microcionides would lead one to suppose, the retention in Plumohalichondria of the species referred to, will be contrary to established prac- tice. If this supposition be correct, the genus Clathrissa will be a valid one, standing in the same einen to Leptosia as Plumohalichondria to Eigecanmcone I was at first in doubt whether the specimens which are labelled as the types of Clathrissa arbuscula were genuine ex- amples of the species, partly because the lengths of their spicules do not agree very well with those w hich Lendenfeld has given, but mainly on account of their lack of resemblance to the figure (Loc. cit., pl. v., fig. 2). I am now, however, quite sure in my own mind that this figure is wrongly repre- sented as illustrating Clathrissa arbuscula, inasmuch as it bears a striking likeness to ordinary specimens of Clathiodendron arbuscula, a species which is described in the same Catalogue ; and I would therefore go so far as to say that the latter species has been figured in mistake for the former. One can the more easily conceive the possibility of such an error in connection with these two species owing to the sameness of their specific names and of the initial letters of their generic names. It is confirmatory also of the opinion here expressed that the ex- ample of Clathrissa arbuscula in Prof. Dendy’s donation of pieces of British Museum sponges agrees with the Australian Museum specimens so labelled. The other discrepancy men- tioned—that in regard to the lengths of the spicules—is of negligible import, since Lendenfeld seems usually to have taken the mean length of spicules into account, rather than their maximum. A brief description of Clathrissa arbuscula may not be out of place. The sponge grows in the form of a tussock of numer- ous, prolifically multiplying, erect slender branches with highly uneven, warty surface. Lendenfeld’s description of the ex- ternal features is fairly satisfactory, but requires some slight emendation. It reads, ‘‘Small, irregular, lobose or digitate sponges wih erect processes, attaining a height of 150 mm. The living sponge is very soft and resilient, orange-red in colour. Spirit specimens are brownish-grey. The whole of the surface is covered with densely-situated villous, distally rounded or thickened outgrowths, which are about 1.5 mm. thick and from 2-8 mm. long.’’ The description might sug- gest that the sponge has a more massive basal portion, but this is not so; though the sponge is sessile and occupies an extended base, the primary branches, except for occasional anastomoses, are independent almost to the subtratum. The 1 Ridley—Zool. Coll. H.M.S. ‘‘Alert,” 1884, p. 430, pl. xl., fig. G, pl. xlii., figs. a-a”. 148 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. warty out-growths of the surface are probably incipient or abortive branches; in fact, the longer ones (‘‘8 mm. long’’) mentioned by Lendenfeld are more correctly described as young branches. This species is closely allied to, if not actually identical with, Ridley’s Myxilla arborescens! which also comes from Port Jackson. The spicules are asymmetrical straight oxea, acanthostyles of two sizes and isochele arcuate. The oxea, when more fully developed, show a _ very faint sub-terminal constriction at both extremities, so that the end portions appear somewhat lanceolate in shape. This feature is usually more distinct at one extremity than the other, and 1s often confined to one end. Sometimes one extremity is much more rounded than the other, and then the spicule may appear monactinal. In young spicules the asymmetry is more pro- nounced, and the end which corresponds to the lanceolate extremity of older spicules usually bears an elongated slender tylosis. The spicules vary in length from about 160 to 285 jt, though comparatively few exceed 220 yp; the stoutest are 5 in diameter. The acanthostyles are conical and tapering, and almost invariably curved; the spines are densely crow ded on the basal end (the spicule appears in consequence somewhat ty lote), and decrease in abundance progressively from base to tip; more than one-third of the length distally, particularly in the case of the larger spicules, may ‘be free from spines. Their length varies from about 85 to over 200 yp; the largest actually seen was 225 yt long. Individuals between 120 and 160 # in length are extremely rare. The spicules accordingly appear to conform to two sizes, the odd ones of intermediate length being possibly stunted individuals of the larger kind. Both kinds echinate the fibres. The largest acanthostyles are, at most, 8 to 9 jt in diameter immediately above the base. The chele are abundant and measure 20 to 26 71 in length. ‘Their end parts are relatively small and the shaft may reach 4.5 }¢ in thickness. A peculiar feature of the skeleton is the occur- rence of elongated tufts of oxea, often standing off from the main fibres as if they were short branches from them, which have been left unprovided with echinating spicules. Stylostichon conulosum, Whitelegge,} is eae closely related to Clathrissa arbuscula to ‘be regarded as a variety of it. The oxea are similar in shape to those of fe latter, and exhibit in some degree the same peculiarity. The sponge is not encrusting in the proper sense of the word, but from an encrusting base numerous miniature crumpled lamella with conulated surface arise vertically. The oxea vary in length from about 165 to 215 4; the stoutest are 6 j in diameter. 1 Whitelegge—Austr. Mus. Mem., iv., 10, 1907, p. 492. SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 149 The acanthostyles bear a close resemblance to those of C. arbuscula and like them are divisible into two sizes. Their lengths lie between go and 210p, but individuals between 120 and 180 in length have not been observed; the stoutest are 121 in diameter. The isochele arcuate differ from those of C. arbuscula only in their slightly larger size; they measure from 21 to 284 in length, with a maximum stoutness of shaft of slightly more than 4.5. Whitelegge’s description would imply that the oxea do not occur as coring spicules, and that the larger acanthostyles do not to any notable extent echinate the fibres. The fact that he placed the species in the genus Stylostichon would imply the same. However, I find that wherever the fibres are not so densely echinated as to obscure the coring spicules, oxea in small numbers are usually to be seen; at the same time, the larger acanthostyles occur plenti- fully as echinating spicules. Nevertheless, it must be con- fessed that the occurrence of oxea in the fibres appears to be more or less sporadic, and accordingly it would seem that no hard and fast distinction can be drawn between Clathrissa and Stylostichon. Plumohalichondria c@spitosa (Carter), as identified by Dendy,! 1s another species sufficiently closely related to C. arbuscula to admit almost of its being regarded as a variety of it. I have examined a slide of this sponge, presented to the Australian Museum by Professor Dendy, and find that the spicules are of the same general character as those of C. arbus- cula. The oxea are slightly smaller, rarely reaching quite as much as 4 in stoutness and varying in length from 150 to 200 yw. Acanthostyles of all lengths from 84 to 240 occur, there being no actual separation into two sizes, although spicules of intermediate lengths are of less frequent occurrence. The isochele arcuate are 27 to 32 in length. It will be noticed that the lengths of the two last-mentioned spicules are much greater than those given by Carter, viz., 20-6000ths and 34-6000ths of an inch respectively. Yvesia commensalis, Whitelegge? is possibly a Stylostichon, that is to say, the main skeleton consists of stout vertical columns composed solely of acanthostyles. The acanthostyles. are, however, arranged plumosely, making an acute angle with the direction of the fibres, and are not differentiated into coring and echinating spicules. The dermal skeleton is a layer of a closely packed isochele arcuate, beyond which the outer ends of divergent tufts of smooth oxea project slightly. The 1 Dendy—Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict., vili., 1896, p. 41; Carter—Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (5), xvi., 1885, p. 352. 2 Whitelegge—Austr. Mus. Mem., iv:, 9, 1906, p. 483. i50 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. dermal, or rather sub-dermal, tufts are sometimes prolonged below into strands which may descend for a moderate distance towards the base of the sponge. A remarkable feature of the species is the occurrence of small irregularly monilated rods, scattered in the ground substance. The rods are apparently proper to the sponge—at any rate they are siliceous; they are possibly homologous with the forcipes of Forcepia. The acan- thostyles vary in length from about 80 to 240 » and may attain a diameter of 17 yw. ‘They are covered, except for a varying distance from the pointed end,with relatively short and stout recurved spines. The microscleric rods are 20 to 50 #4 long and, even in their most swollen portions, rarely as much as 5 }/ in diameter. The oxea are very abruptly and often acuminately pointed spicules ranging in length from about 80 to 180 4, though rarely less than 100, or more than 160 p long; the stoutest are 8y in diameter. The chele are very abundant; they usually have a much curved shaft, so that the extremities of the anterior teeth approach each other very closely and sometimes overlap or fuse; size variable, the length ranging from 10 to 244. The dimensions of the spicules given above differ slightly from those given by Whitelegge, so that prob- ably some amount of variation in their size occurs in different specimens. It is of interest to note that Microciona scabida, Carter,! differs from Clathrissa mainly through the possession of sty- lote, instead of diactinal auxiliary spicules. The microscleres are chele apparently of three or four kinds, viz. :—(1.) a stout isochela arcuata, 30 » long ; (il.) a smaller slender isochela with curved shaft and very sharply pointed flukes, which occurs in great abundance ; (iii.) a cheloid with much curved shaft, which appears to be an abnormality of the first-mentioned ; and (iv.) a peculiar cheloid also with much curved shaft and of smaller size than the others, which apparently belongs to the same Category as certain of the forms termed bipocilla, but which may be a derivative of the second kind. As my object in referring to this species is merely to draw attention to its relationship with Clathrissa on the one hand and with Stylo- tellopsis on the other I have not undertaken the possibly diff- cult task of determining the precise nature of these cheloids. The fibres are echinated and to some extent cored, by acantho- styles of two orders of size, the smaller rarely exc eeding say 110 in length, the larger reaching to 220 x 7 yw. The coring spicules are chiefly straight slender subtylostyli, of which the 1 Dendy—Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict., viii. (n.s.), 1896, p. 51; Carter—Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (5), xv., 1885, p. 112, figs. 4, 5. SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 151 jargest measure about 270 x 4p. Beneath the surface of the sponge and running pee meuciciaals towards it are numerous wispy strands of the same spicules. With regard to the ar- rangement of the skeleton Microciona scabida stands precisely in the same relation to the type-species of Stylotellopsis—S. amabilist-—as does Crella incrustans var. levis to C. incrustans var. pumila; and, in compliance with the present scheme of classification, should accordingly be placed in Thiele’s genus. Another interesting species whose systematic position ap- pears to be somew Bere in the vicinity of Clathrissa and Stylo- tellopsis 1s Echinodictyum ridleyt, Dendy. 2 The skeleton is made up almost entirely of slender longitudinal wispy fibres and is consequently rather of the dendritic than of the reticu- late type. Accompanying the slender oxeote or rather torno- toxeote spicules (size about 270 x 4) which chiefly compose these fibres, are a few conical smooth styli (190 x 7 y#) and acanthostyles (100 x 6), both kinds of which occasionally project from the fibres somewhat in the manner of echinating spicules. There are no microscleres. The diactinal spicules of the fibres evidently correspond to the auxiliary megascleres of normal Myxillina, and the species accordingly possesses no claim to a place in the genus Echinodictyum in which the fibres are formed by principal spicules and in which the aux- iliary spicules are represented by interstitial or dermal styli. Also, it is scarcely to be doubted that the smooth conical styli are homologues of the larger acanthostyles of Clathrissa arbuscula, Stylotellopsis amabilis and S. (Microciona) scabida and to the principal styli of normal Myxilline. C. arbuscula and S. amabilis differ in generic characters mainly in this respect, that in the latter the auxiliary megascleres are pointed at one end only, whilst in the former they are pointed at both ends. But this difference cannot be regarded as of much im- portance since the probability is that the tornotoxea of C. arbuscula are, strictly speaking, just as truly monactinal as the tornostrongyles of S. amahilis. Consequently Echino- dictyum ridleyi owing to the perfect smoothness of its prin- cipal styli, stands farther removed from either of the two last mentioned species than these do from each other, and is thus fairly entitled to distinction under a new generic name. In E. ridleyi, as already mentioned, the principal and accessory styli are both comparatively rare in their occurrence; if the former spicules were to disappear, such a species as Echino- dictyum spongiosum, Dendy,’ would result; whilst if both kinds were lost, there would be scarcely anything in the struc- 1 Thiele--Fauna Chilensis, Bd. 3, p. 456, fig. 72 a-d. 2 Dendy—Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict., viil., 1896, p. 44. 3 Dendy—Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict., viii., 1896, p. 45. nee “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. ture of the skeleton to distinguish it generically from certain species at present included in the genus Axinella. The three sponges described by Lendenfeld! under the name of Echinonema anchoratum, Carter, have, according to their description, the spiculation of Clathrissa, but the skeleton is reticulate. The best plan to adopt in regard to these sponges is to regard them as species dubi@ of Wilsonella (g.v.). GENUS CRELLA, Gray. Thiele? has expressed the opinion that Plumohalichondria incrustans, Carter, should be placed in the genus Pytheas which, as Lundbeck has recently shown, must now be called Crella. Accordingly | employ the latter name for the sponges about to be described. These agree so closely in the charac- ters and dimensions of their spicules that, despite considerable differences in some other respects, they might very well be treated—in contrast with other species of the genus—as varieties of a single species, Crella incrustans. In this species, as in Clathrissa arbuscula the smooth oxeote spicules are secondarily diactinal. CRELLA INCRUSTANS, Carter, ET VARR. (Plate xxiil., figs. 2, 3; Plate xxiv. ; and figs. 28-34.) General diagnosis: External form various ; encrusting, massive or ramose. Oscula present in probably all the varieties. Typically (unless in encrusting varieties) the branching ascendent fibres of the main skeleton are sinuous and interosculate so as to form a kind of loose reticulation (pseudo-reticulation); connecting fibres, in small number, may occur. The fibres are fairly closely, sometimes extremely densely, echinated with straight conical acanthostyles; the coring spicules may be exclu- sively smooth oxea, or exclusively acanthostyles, or a mixture of ,both. Foreign particles are in some cases included in the fibres. The dermal skeleton ts a layer of shorter (usually slightly curved) acanthostyles, with a reticulate or more or less confused arrangement, rarely accompanied by relatively few smooth oxeotes. All three kinds of megascleres occur interstitially, the dermal acan- thostyles typically in greatest abundance. The micro- scleres are of a single kind, isochele arcuate, scattered interstitially and in the dermal layer in moderate abund- 1 Lendenfeld—Cat. Sponges Austr. Mus., 1888, p. 219. The three sponges referred to bear the varietal names. ramosa, dura and lamellosa. Their type-specimens appear to have been lost, since the specimens which Whitelegge regarded as such cannot at all be reconciled with Lendenfeld’s descriptions (vide Appendix). 2 Thiele—Archiv. Naturg., 1903, p. 388. SPONGES.—_HALLMANN. 153 ance. The smooth oxeotes are asymmetrical, and when they attain in the fullest degree their characteristic shape are tornotoxea with a slight flexion at the tip of the oxeote extremity. The extremes of the maximum dimen- sions of the spicules in the known varieties are as fol- lows :—Tornotoxea: Length, 160 to 220 p; diameter, 4.5 to 6 pw. Echinating acanthostyles: Length, 145 to 200 yw; diameter, 8 to 12 pw. Dermal acanthostyles: Length, So to 100 4; diameter, 5 to § yp. Isochele arcuate: Length, 16 to 25 yp. The several sponges now to be described agree so closely in the form and dimensions of their spicules that—despite con- siderable differences in some other respects—it has been con- sidered preferable to treat them as varieties of a single species. Any differences that there may be in the shapes of the spicules in the different varieties are too slight to be of diagnostic value, and a single description will therefore suffice for all. The megascleres are smooth oxeotes, and acanthostyles of two kinds; the microscleres are isochele arcuate of a single kind. The oxea are slender, asymmetrical, slightly fusiform straight spicules which in their very earliest stages of growth appear to be monactinal. Their characteristic peculiarity— which is usually, however, to be observed only in small pro- portion of them—is a slight bending to one side of the tip of one extremity. This peculiarity as it appears when most highly developed, is illustrated in text-figure 29, where it is also to be observed that the spicule is most correctly described as a tornotoxea. Throughout the descriptions they will be re- ferred to merely as the oxea, or sometimes as the auxiliary spicules. The extent to which they enter into the formation of the fibre-core varies greatly in the different varieties ; in the, variety digitata they are pretty well the sole constituents ; in the varieties perramosa and levis they are mingled with a variable proportion of acanthostyles ; in the varieties arenacea and rubra they are usually more or less completely supplanted by acanthostyles. An interesting condition is found in the variety pumila, where columns of oxea, descending down- wards from the surface without admixture of acanthostyles, form a common and characteristic feature of the skeleton. The oxea also occur as interstitial spicules, but except in the variety digitata are outnumbered as such by the accessory acanthostyles ; in the last named variety also, they participate in the formation of the dermal skeleton. The acanthostyles, as previously mentioned, are of two kinds. Those which predominate as echinating spicules and often in addition core the fibres are straight conical spicules of variable length, pro- vided with more or less recurved spines which are usually 154 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. absent, for a short distance, from the distal extremity. These spicules will be referred as the principal acanthostyles. The acanthostyles of the second kind are the characteristic and usually the sole elements of the dermal skeleton and at the same time the predominant spicules of the ground substance. From the evidence afforded chiefly by the varieties perramosa and digitata— in which, owing to the absence of crowding, the echinating spicules are, with greater advantage than in the other varieties, individually discernible in detail—I am convinced that spicules, similar in all respects to these dermal acanthostyles, may also occur quite commonly both as echin- ating and coring spicules. Accordingly, I will not in general use the terms “‘echinating’’ and ‘‘dermal’’ to distinguish the two forms of acanthostyles, but instead ‘‘principal’’ and ‘‘ac- cessory.”*> One sees also in the different varieties that there is a perfect gradation between the extremes of form shown by the accessory spicules on the one hand and the principal spicules on the other. Accordingly in determining the dimen- .sions of the accessory acanthostyles I have measured those spicules only which are situated actually in the dermal skele- ton, and as regards the principal acanthostyles, have taken account of their maximum size alone. The accessory acan- thostyles are slightly curved and slightly fusiform spicules covered, almost or quite to the distal extremity, with spines which stand perpendicularly to the axis of the spicule. The isochelee arcuate are rather abundant and show a tendency, which is strongly marked in some varieties, to become dif- ferentiated into two sorts, a larger and a smaller. The arrangement of the skeleton shows appreciable differences in the different varieties, though not always to an extent that permits of distinction in a verbal description. In the non- encrusting varieties with the exception of levis, the fibres, owing to their undulating courses and anastomoses, often form a kind of pseudo-reticulation; in the variety perramosa, actual transverse fibres in moderate number are developed. This last-mentioned variety is therefore of considerable in- terest, since it shows that a reticulate type of skeleton may be developed directly from a dendritic type-——a fact which lessens the importance of a generic distinction based solely on such a difference in the character of the skeleton. In all the varieties the fibres are rich in spongin. The typical variety of the species is Carter’s Echinonema incrustans from Port Phillip. which has been described as ‘‘massive incrusting, thick, covering the whole of a Pecten.’’ I have not so far met with any specimen in the Australian Museum collection of Port Phillip sponges which admits of identification with Carter’s species, but I have before me two mounted sections prepared by Mr. Whitelegge from pieces of British Museum specimens, SPONGES.-HALLMANN. 155 labelled ‘‘Echinonema incrustans Carter type,’’ and ‘‘Plumo- halichondria mammullata, Carter’’ respectively. These do not satisfactorily corroborate Dendy’s assertion of the synonymy of the two names, since the latter slide shows a skeletal struc- ture rather resembling that of the var. levis, and chele vary- ing from 13 to 26y in length; whilst in the former the structure is much looser—somewhat similar to that of the var. digitata—-and the chelz are only 12 to 22 p long. Without wishing to attach any great importance to this discrepancy, I simply point to the possibility of a varietal difference between the sponges of Carter’s two species. The point can only be settled by a re-examination of the original specimens. — In view of the existence of so many distinct but closely allied varietal forms of this species,! it is necessary to proceed cautiously in introducing synonymy; unless a complete con- necting series between two forms is known to exist, it is far better—because less liable to lead to confusion—to treat them as distinct varieties, each with a distinguishing name.