View Post [edit]
Poster: | inthistube | Date: | May 11, 2006 1:16pm |
Forum: | etree | Subject: | Chipmunk-style streams? |
I've noticed that several of the shows streaming from the new embedded player are played back at double speed (e.g. Chipmunk style). Is this a problem with one of my plugins, or an issue with the lossy deriver?
Example:
http://www.archive.org/details/dbern2002-02-22.shnf
Reply [edit]
Poster: | Diana Hamilton | Date: | May 12, 2006 12:56am |
Forum: | etree | Subject: | Re: Chipmunk-style streams? |
This post was modified by Diana Hamilton on 2006-05-12 07:56:54
Reply [edit]
Poster: | xtifr | Date: | May 12, 2006 8:09am |
Forum: | etree | Subject: | Re: Chipmunk-style streams? |
Didn't check the oggs, but then I can only stream those with my local player. (Another complaint I have about the flash player.)
Reply [edit]
Poster: | Jonathan Aizen | Date: | May 15, 2006 12:42am |
Forum: | etree | Subject: | Re: Chipmunk-style streams? |
Jon
Reply [edit]
Poster: | Diana Hamilton | Date: | May 15, 2006 1:09am |
Forum: | etree | Subject: | Re: Chipmunk-style streams? |
This post was modified by Diana Hamilton on 2006-05-15 08:09:39
Reply [edit]
Poster: | Jonathan Aizen | Date: | May 15, 2006 1:52am |
Forum: | etree | Subject: | Re: Chipmunk-style streams? |
Jon
Reply [edit]
Poster: | xtifr | Date: | May 16, 2006 7:17am |
Forum: | etree | Subject: | Re: Chipmunk-style streams? |
Curiously, the most recent report (and the only one that's still open) suggests that the problem only occurs if the bitrate is NOT a multiple of 16, while the Archive is only seeing the problem with files whose bitrate IS a multiple of 16.
I looked (or tried to look) at the player that PhunkyZen pointed to, but it requires Flash8, and I only have Flash7. I suspect that could be a problem for a lot of people, since this is the first I'd heard that there even was a Flash8. And if the problem is in Flash (and not the player), it's possible that upgrading to Flash8 would fix the problem in any case. Someone who cares enough to try upgrading their flash might want to investigate.
Reply [edit]
Poster: | Tyler | Date: | May 17, 2006 5:05am |
Forum: | etree | Subject: | Re: Chipmunk-style streams? |
the 'pause' feature seems to have time limit before it changes the position to the 'stopped' position. I.E. if you pause a show in the embedded streaming player. you can 'un pause it' in the near future, but if you leave it paused for ~ 5 minutes or so, (maybe less) the player will go to the 'stop' position and if you hit 'play' thinking it will resume at the original paused position, it will not. it will start at the beggining of the song (since it was 'stopped').
Reply [edit]
Poster: | xurizaemon | Date: | May 17, 2006 8:00am |
Forum: | etree | Subject: | Re: Chipmunk-style streams? |
11Khz, 22Khz, 44Khz
Although other INTARWEB references also say that things are fine if you use a multiple of 16KHz or only for 64/96/128Khz. Or is that Kbps? Ah! See the compatability table here - there is a difference:
http://loudblog.de/forum/viewtopic.php?id=46 has a compatability table which lists working bitrates.
Or, Google for "chipmunk mp3 flash"
http://music.podshow.com/music/faq.htm claims that 8 khz, 11.025 khz, 12 khz, 16 khz, 22.05 khz, 24 khz work.
Macromedia Flash's "Publish" settings apparently have a fixed number of bitrates. I guess this would give us a good clue as to what might work and what might not. Why MM opted to hardcode these is probably best known to them, I'm sure there's a good reason :)
You may want to ask Macromedia to fix this:
http://www.macromedia.com/support/email/wishform/
Reply [edit]
Poster: | xtifr | Date: | May 17, 2006 5:52pm |
Forum: | etree | Subject: | Re: Chipmunk-style streams? |
Reply [edit]
Poster: | xurizaemon | Date: | May 17, 2006 6:53pm |
Forum: | etree | Subject: | Re: Chipmunk-style streams? |
above is just pointing to other references, nothing to debunk here, move along.
hyperlink points but not is
i got mine working fine anyway ... good luck, dude!
Reply [edit]
Poster: | Diana Hamilton | Date: | May 17, 2006 6:52pm |
Forum: | etree | Subject: | Re: Chipmunk-style streams? |
But specifically, the some = every one created since the changeover, none prior to the changeover.
Reply [edit]
Poster: | mezzy777 | Date: | Jul 9, 2006 4:38pm |
Forum: | etree | Subject: | Re: Chipmunk-style streams? |
http://www.archive.org/details/Seven_League_Boots_Mar31_06.mp3
so this is not fixable?
Reply [edit]
Poster: | xurizaemon | Date: | May 17, 2006 8:19am |
Forum: | etree | Subject: | Re: Chipmunk-style streams? |
Reply [edit]
Poster: | xurizaemon | Date: | May 17, 2006 8:20am |
Forum: | etree | Subject: | Re: Chipmunk-style streams? |
Reply [edit]
Poster: | PhunkyZen | Date: | May 15, 2006 11:07pm |
Forum: | etree | Subject: | Re: Chipmunk-style streams? |
http://www.jeroenwijering.com/?item=Flash_MP3_Player
It seems that the license is ok for this site since it's non-commercial.
Reply [edit]
Poster: | Jonathan Aizen | Date: | May 15, 2006 11:11pm |
Forum: | etree | Subject: | Re: Chipmunk-style streams? |
Jon
Reply [edit]
Poster: | inthistube | Date: | May 16, 2006 9:59am |
Forum: | etree | Subject: | Re: Chipmunk-style streams? |
FYI, I tried loading one of the LMA-generated xml playlists into the player from www.jeroenwijering.com, and it suffers from the same problem with 64k files. I also upgraded to the latest version of Flash 8, and that didn't help either.
This is an issue with Flash in general... or perhaps the two players derive from the same codebase and suffer from the same flaw. :)
- Lance
Reply [edit]
Poster: | inthistube | Date: | May 16, 2006 10:14am |
Forum: | etree | Subject: | Re: Chipmunk-style streams? |