<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="0.91">
   <channel>
     <title>Internet Archive Forums: FreeCache Forum</title>
	 <link>http://www.archive.org/web/freecache.php#forum</link>
	 <description>The most recent posts from the IA forum: FreeCache Forum</description>
	 <language>en-us</language>
	 <webmaster>tracey@archive.org</webmaster>
	 <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:44:46 UTC</pubDate><item>
  <title>alternative: Coral content distribution network</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=248906</link>
  <description>Use CoralCDN instead of FreeCache. It works similarly. For details, see &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.coralcdn.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.coralcdn.org&lt;/a&gt;  <p>Posted by: Ahmad Gharbeia</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>Re: Coral for mostly small files?</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=59098</link>
  <description>thanks, i'll have to remember that.

i think there was a small window between freecache and other file hosting sites like rapidshare.de and megaupload.com . luckily its now easier to find such hosts...  <p>Posted by: compn</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>Re: Coral for mostly small files?</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=59061</link>
  <description>CoBlitz service in PlanetLab (CoDeeN) now do the similar thing as FreeCache did in the past - they cache large files of unlimited size. Distinctly, they distribute every file to many nodes and collect...  <p>Posted by: AlexeyPetrov</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>Coral for mostly small files?</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=34161</link>
  <description>the whole point was to cache large files and save the original host, coral seems to be better for html and smaller files.

anyways, freecache was great while it was around and hopefully coral will c...  <p>Posted by: compn</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>Re: freecache a dead horse now?</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=22514</link>
  <description>the coral guys are up for the redirect, so prepending
freecache.org on a URL should work again.

The also changed how they handle files larger than 50MB by just redirecting back to the original sou...  <p>Posted by: brewster</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>Re: freecache a dead horse now?</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=22433</link>
  <description>Freecache is shelved for now.   We have not installed the right redirects, but yes, it is being shelved.

We did not have a good proposition or mature enough tool to attract other freecache sites.  ...  <p>Posted by: brewster</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>Re: freecache a dead horse now?</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=22432</link>
  <description>As I understand it, Freecache is an experimental service, and it's staffed largely by volunteers right now. So that's why nobody is necessarily around to help answer questions on it, unlike, say, the ...  <p>Posted by: simon c</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>freecache a dead horse now?</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=22431</link>
  <description>the service has been down for over a week, and there has been no response to the few posts made in that time by whomever may be in charge.

is it safe to assume that freecache is no more? were you g...  <p>Posted by: narial</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>Is the server down again?</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=22379</link>
  <description>Why did the status page offline?  <p>Posted by: OzLeIsrael</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>Re: alternative to freecache</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=22266</link>
  <description>Corel doesn't support files larger than 50mb  <p>Posted by: FerragoJas</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>alternative to freecache</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=22239</link>
  <description>People not happy with Freecache might take a look at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scs.cs.nyu.edu/coral/&quot;&gt;Coral&lt;/a&gt;.  Its similar in that its a network of web caches that anyone can utilize by modifying the url...  <p>Posted by: akb</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>Re: FreeCache down again?</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=22233</link>
  <description>Seems it is down again, any news or update?  <p>Posted by: dj_goku</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>FreeCache down again?</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=22202</link>
  <description>Freecache.org doesn't seem to respond, and the status page shows that no files have been accessed in the last 24hrs.  <p>Posted by: FerragoJas</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>Coral vs FreeCache</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=22023</link>
  <description>Coral: limits cached files to 50 megs
FreeCache: doesn't seem to have a limit other than the space a mirror chooses to reserve
Coral: tries to mirror sites by encoding the real hostname in the coral...  <p>Posted by: sandymac</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>Similar to Coral from New York University</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=21944</link>
  <description>This project seems very much like the Coral project from New York University, though theirs is available a bit more of the time.

Is there any interaction between freecache and that project?

http...  <p>Posted by: sbonds</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>Re: freecache vs. bittorrent</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=21258</link>
  <description>I think that if a bittorrent could be set up to have all of the freecache mirrors/downloaders all being tracked by the tracker, then having a person download only from the people who they are closest ...  <p>Posted by: BoredNL</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>Re: Down Again?</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=21129</link>
  <description>Thanks for all of your work on this, Brak!  <p>Posted by: Ben Burch</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>Re: Down Again?</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=21111</link>
  <description>Mmm... should be better again.  It will go down again tomorrow for about an hour.  <p>Posted by: Brak</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>Down Again?</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=21107</link>
  <description>It seems that freecache is dead again, does anybody know what's going on here?  <p>Posted by: BenFranske</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>Seems to be up now.</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=20798</link>
  <description>I'm seeing indications in my log files that the cache is again functioning!  <p>Posted by: Ben Burch</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>Re: Freecache Dead? Whats happening?</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=20686</link>
  <description>Yeah - what IS happening?

This was an EXTREMELY valuable service for free music advocates. Has ANYBODY got any information about the Freecache project? It was absolutely THE solution to a large subse...  <p>Posted by: thb</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>Re: Freecache Dead? Whats happening?</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=20497</link>
  <description>I am betting that the folks who were caching illegal porn content (bestiality, child porn) ruined this for the rest of us.  :-(

All *I* want to cache are political talk radio show archives.  <p>Posted by: Ben Burch</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>Freecache Dead? Whats happening?</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=20462</link>
  <description>Been down for a while... have people forgotten about it?  <p>Posted by: FerragoJas</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>Re: Help for Mac Os X user</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=19959</link>
  <description>I am always maxed out with my dialup 56k, nothing will speed me up anymore, downloading at 5 k to 10k sometimes.  <p>Posted by: davidlaska</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>System does not seem to be up at all...</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=19953</link>
  <description>I know what the log entries look like when freecache is doing its thing, and for at least the last few days, it hasn't been...  <p>Posted by: Ben Burch</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>How do you know?</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=19839</link>
  <description>I have put a couple large files on my site with http://freecache.org infront of the links, but my traffic is really high. How do I know if its being cached?  <p>Posted by: Hadriel</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>Still no cache that I can see</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=19444</link>
  <description>Hi,
For a while now I have my files linked through http://freecache.org/http://myurl.com/file.wmv and I do not see any of them here in the 'detailed status' page. I see from the post below this that ...  <p>Posted by: Lenny23</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>%3A works, but %3a does not in freecache links</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=19426</link>
  <description>%3A works, but %3a does not in freecache links

for example this would work, http://freecache.org/http%3A//mysite.com/myfile.zip

but this would not:
http://freecache.org/http%3a//mysite.com/myfi...  <p>Posted by: jimmyD</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>Re: Two questions</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=18240</link>
  <description>If your .asx files are over 5MB, it will cache them. Otherwise, I think .asx files are generally just pointers to a server that will stream data for the users. If you want to use Freecache, let your u...  <p>Posted by: ahaning</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>Re: Help for Mac Os X user</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=18235</link>
  <description>If you're wanting to DOWNLOAD much faster from someone else, Freecache won't help you at all.

What you could do is to write to the person hosting the file and suggest that they use Freecache by pre...  <p>Posted by: ahaning</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>Two questions</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=18193</link>
  <description>Firstly, I'd like to know if this service would support .asx files, and if they'd work properly.

Secondly- I tried ussing the url http://freecache.org to preface all my large video links and I stil...  <p>Posted by: Lenny23</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>Re: Help for Mac Os X user</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=18131</link>
  <description>Hello again! I fear I must have misunderstoof but I did go under the help section and all I thought it was saying was loads of cgi stuff which I did not quite understand. I shall look into this and ho...  <p>Posted by: globalmouse</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>Re: Help for Mac Os X user</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=18130</link>
  <description>&gt; server on it and subsequently download free
&gt; cache afterwards. I am all new to this perl,
&gt; cgi-bin language (sorry to all you techies
&gt; out there! I am a half-nerd)

You probably did not unde...  <p>Posted by: dj1yfk</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>Re: WMV files</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=18129</link>
  <description>Yes, of course.  <p>Posted by: dj1yfk</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>Re: How to get cached?</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=17985</link>
  <description>I think there's a lot of confusion on how Freecache works. Perhaps Ralf (the coder) could write up a mini-FAQ for us that we could put front and center on the Freecache page.

I've seen a lot of peo...  <p>Posted by: simon c</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>Re: How to get cached?</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=17987</link>
  <description>The docs say all you do is add freecache.org/ before your url, that's a simplicity that seems logical.  And the project can't really be abused as its goal is to spread out bandwidth regardless of cont...  <p>Posted by: akb</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>Re: How to get cached?</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=17984</link>
  <description>But it doesnt seem logical that there's no link to simply add the content. I mean, so many people could be abusing that feature.  <p>Posted by: Paulius_G</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>Re: How to get cached?</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=17983</link>
  <description>Maybe there's a threshold for number of downloads.  <p>Posted by: akb</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>Re: How to get cached?</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=17982</link>
  <description>already a few weeks now..  <p>Posted by: Paulius_G</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>Re: How to get cached?</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=17959</link>
  <description>It takes a certain amount of time and requests before the caches pick up your content.    <p>Posted by: akb</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>Re: How to get cached?</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=17912</link>
  <description>Uhhh.... But what it does is that it downloads directly from my server. And because the server is on same network as me (domain name is put in windows hosts) the download was clocked at 15802kbps for ...  <p>Posted by: Paulius_G</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>Help for Mac Os X user</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=17893</link>
  <description>hi! I am new to free cache, Mac os X server and all. After doing some research on the net, I realise that my Mac OS X already has pre-installed apache on it and I can run a server on it and subsequent...  <p>Posted by: globalmouse</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>Not being cached?</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=17847</link>
  <description>How do I know that my files are being cached? I added http://freecache.org/ to my files, but I don't see any difference and I don't see my files listed the detailed status or content pages on this arc...  <p>Posted by: AllKnightAccess</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>Great idea!</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=17541</link>
  <description>Thanks for this, it's a great service and finally gives me something to do with the 1.4TB/month of bandwidth I wouldn't actually use otherwise.  <p>Posted by: sourceo</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>Re: A simpler method</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=17263</link>
  <description>The exact link for the Javascript and the onload() mod needed to fully enable all large downloads as freecache links can be found at http://onionnetworks.com/ocn/ocn-example.php  <p>Posted by: mrG</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>Re: when caching start to get to action?</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=17138</link>
  <description>Do some math; a 6.5MB file downloaded 500 times would be 3250MB. So, your file would appear to be cached, and cached queries (savings) are accounting for ~85% of your downloads.  <p>Posted by: Guspaz</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>Re: Hosted Content</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=17031</link>
  <description>Registered users of the Internet Archive can delete files from FreeCache system-wide. Use the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.archive.org/web/freecache/content.php&quot;&gt;Remove Content&lt;/a&gt; link, featured in the upper ...  <p>Posted by: Ralf Muehlen</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>Hosted Content</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=16981</link>
  <description>I've recently put up a freecache mirror, however recently it's begun to serve porn - beastiality nontheless.. I understand the concept of a free system and whatnot.. but should there not be some sort ...  <p>Posted by: sHORTYWZ</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>Re: How to get cached?</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=16963</link>
  <description>The link works fine. Clocked the download at 35 KB/s.   <p>Posted by: giantkicks.com</p></description>
</item><item>
  <title>Re: mirror propagation heurstics</title>
  <link>http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=16792</link>
  <description>Yes. I look like you are correct. I see the same behavior, but still I am not 100% sure.  <p>Posted by: gilco</p></description>
</item>    </channel>
</rss>