Skip to main content

Full text of "(1) Elements of the petrographic study of bonding clays and of the clay substance of molding sands"

See other formats


s 


} 


STATE  OF  ILLINOIS 

JOHN  STELLE,  Governor 

DEPARTMENT  OF  REGISTRATION  AND  EDUCATION 

JOHN  J.  HALLIHAN.   Director 

DIVISION  OF  THE 

STATE     GEOLOGICAL    SURVEY 

M.  M.  LEIGHTON,  Chief 
URBANA 


REPORT  OF  INVESTIGATIONS  —  NO.   69 


(1)     Elements  of  the  Petrographic  Study  oi  Bonding  Clays 
and  of  the  Clay  Substance  of  Molding  Sands 

Ralph  E.  Grim 

(2)     Mineral  Composition  and  Texture  of  Clay  Substance 
of  Natural  Molding  Sands 

Ralph  E.  Grim  and  Carl  E.  Schubert 

(3)     The  Relationship  Between  the  Physical  and  Mineralogical 
Characteristics  of  Bonding  Clays 

Ralph  E.  Grim  and  Richards  A,  Rowland 


Reprinted  from  the  Transactions  of  the  American  Foundrymen's  Association, 
Vol.  47,  No.  4,  pp.  895-908;  935-953;  Vol.  48,  No.  1,  pp.  211-224,  1940. 


PRINTED  BY  AUTHORITY  OF  THE  STATE  OF  ILLINOIS 


URBANA,  ILLINOIS 
1940 


STATE  OF   ILLINOIS 

HON.  JOHN  STELLE,   Governor 

DEPARTMENT  OF  REGISTRATION  AND   EDUCATION 

HON.  JOHN  J.   HALLIHAN,   Director 


EDSON  S.  BASTIN,  Ph.D 
WILLIAM  A.  NOYES,  Ph.D 

Chemistry 
LOUIS  R.  HOWSON,  C.E.,  Engineering 


BOARD  OF 
NATURAL  RESOURCES  AND  CONSERVATION 

HON.  JOHN  J.   HALLIHAN,   Chairman 
Geology  WILLIAM  TRELEASE 


LL.D.,  Chcm.D.,  D.Sc, 


D.Sc.,  LL.D.,  Biology 
EZRA  JACOB   KRAUS,  Ph.D.,  D.Sc.,  Forestry 
ARTHUR    CUTTS    WILLARD,    D.Engr.,    LL.D. 
President  of  the  University  of  Illinois 


STATE    GEOLOGICAL    SURVEY    DIVISION 

Urban  a 
M.   M.  LEIGHTON,   Ph.D.,  Chief 


ENID  TOWNLEY, 
JANE  TITCOMB, 


M.S.,  Assistant  to  the  Chief 
M.A.,  Geological  Assistant 


GEOLOGICAL  RESOURCES 

Coal 

G.  H.  CADY,  Ph.D.,  Senior  Geologist  and  Head 
L.  C.  McCABE,  Ph.D.,  Geologist 
JAMES  M.  SCHOPF,  Ph.D.,  Asst.  Geologist 
J.  NORMAN  PAYNE,  Ph.D.,  Asst.  Geologist 
CHARLES  C.  BOLEY,  M.S.,  Asst.  Mining  Eng. 

Industrial  Minerals 

J.  E.  LAMAR,  B.S.,  Geologist  and  Head 
H.  B.  WILLMAN,  Ph.D.,  Assoc.  Geologist 
DOUGLAS  F.  STEVENS,  M.E.,  Research  Associate 
ROBERT  M.  GROGAN,  Ph.D.,  Asst.  Geologist 
ROBERT  R.  REYNOLDS,  B.S.,  Research  Assistant 

Oil  and  Gas 

A.  H.  BELL,  Ph.D.,  Geologist  and  Head 
G.  V.  COHEE,  Ph.D.,  Asst.  Geologist 
FREDERICK  SQUIRES,  B.S.,  Assoc.  Petr.  Eng. 
CHARLES  W.  CARTER,  Ph.D.,  Asst.  Geologist 
WILLIAM  H.  EASTON,  Ph.D.,  Asst.  Geologist 
ROY  B.  RALSTON,  B.A.,  Research  Assistant 
WAYNE  F.   MEENTS,   Research  Assistant 

Areal  and  Engineering  Geology 

GEORGE  E.  EKBLAW^  Ph.D.,  Geologist  and  Head 
RICHARD  F.  FISHER,  B.A.,  Research  Assistant 

Subsurface  Geology 

L.  E.  WORKMAN,  M.S.,  Geologist  and  Head 
ELWOOD  ATHERTON,  Ph.D.,  Asst.  Geologist 
MERLYN  B.  BUHLE,  M.S.,  Asst.  Geologist 
I.  T.  SCHWADE,  M.S.,  Asst.  Geologist 
FRANK  E.  TIPPIE,  B.S.,  Research  Assistant 

Stratigraphy  and  Paleontology 

J.  MARVIN  W^ELLER,  Ph.D.,  Geologist  and  Head 
CHALMER  L.  COOPER,  M.S.,  Assoc.  Geologist 

Petrography 

RALPH  E.  GRIM,  Ph.D.,  Petrographer 

RICHARDS  A.  ROWLAND,  Ph.D.,  Asst.  Petrographer 

Physics 

R.  J.  PIERSOL,  Ph.D.,  Physicist 

DONALD  O.  HOLLAND,  M.S.,  Asst.  Physicist 

PAUL  F.  ELARDE,  B.S.,  Research  Assistant 


GEOCHEMISTRY 

FRANK  H.  REED,  Ph.D.,  Chief  Chemist 
W.  F.  BRADLEY,  Ph.D.,  Assoc.  Chemist 
G.  C.  FINGER,  Ph.D.,  Assoc.  Chemist 
ROBERTA  M.  LANGENSTEIN,  B.S.,  Research  Assist- 
ant 

Fuels 

G.  R.  YOHE,  Ph.D.,  Assoc.  Chemist  in  Charge 
CARL  HARMAN,  M.S.,  Research  Assistant 

Industrial  Minerals 

J.  S.  MACHIN,  Ph.D.,  Chemist  and  Head 
JAMES  F.  VANECEK,  M.S.,  Research  Assistant 

Analytical 

O.  W.  REES,  Ph.D.,  Chemist  and  Head 
L.  D.  McVICKER,  B.S.,  Asst.  Chemist 
GEORGE  W.  LAND,  M.S.,  Research  Assistant 
P.  W.  HENLINE,  M.S.,  Asst.  Chemical  Engineer 
MATHEW  KALINOWSKI,  M.S.,  Research  Assistant 
ARNOLD  J.  VERAGUTH,  M.S.,  Research  Assistant 
WILLIAM  F.  WAGNER,  M.S.,  Research  Assistant 


MINERAL  ECONOMICS 

W.  H.  VOSKUIL.  Ph.D..  Mineral  Economist 
GRACE  N.  OLIVER,  A.  B.,  Assistant  in  Mineral  Eco- 
nomics 


EDUCATIONAL  EXTENSION 

DON  L.  CARROLL.  B.S.,  Assoc.  Geologist 

PUBLICATIONS  AND  RECORDS 

GEORGE  E.  EKBLAW,  Ph.D..  Geologic  Editor 
CHALMER  L.  COOPER.  M.S..  Geologic  Editor 
DOROTHY  ROSE.  B.S..  Technical  Editor 
KATHRYN  K.  DEDMAN,  M.A.,  Asst.  Technical 

Editor 
ALMA  R.  SW^EENY,  A.B.,  Technical  Files  Clerk 
FRANCES  HARPER  LEHDE,  A.M.,  Asst.  Technical 

Files  Clerk 
JEWELL  WALCHER,  Asst.  Technical  Files  Clerk 
MEREDITH  M.  CALKINS,  Geologic  Draftsman 
LESLIE  D.  VAUGHAN,  Asst.  Photographer 
DOLORES  THOMAS  SIMS,  B.A.,  Geologic  Clerk 


Consultants:     Ceramics,  CULLEN  W.  PARMELEE,  M.S.,  D.Sc,  and  RALPH  K.  HURSH,  B.S.,  University  of  Illinois; 
Pleistocene  Invertebrate  Paleontology,  FRANK  COLLINS  BAKER,  B.S.,  University  of  Illinois. 
Topography  Mapping  in  Cooperation  with  the  United  States  Geological  Survey. 

This  Report  is  a  Contribution  of  the  Petrography  Division. 


ILLINOIS  STATE  GEOLOGICAL  SURVEY 


3  3051  00005  7186 


(A32934— 1500— 10-40) 


November  1,  1940 


^^1 

rvo,  G) 

(L,  a 

CONTENTS 


PAGE 

Elements  of  the  Petrographic  Study  of  Bonding  Clays  and  of  the  Clay  Substance  of  Molding  Sands: 

Ralph  E,  Grim 5 

Mineral  Composition  and  Texture  of  the  Clay  Substance  of  Natural  Molding  Sands:    Ralph  E.  Grim 

and  Carl  E.  Schubert 12 

Relationship  Between  the  Physical  and  Mineralogical  Characteristics  of  Bonding  Clays:   Ralph  E.  Grim 

and  Richards  A.  Rowland 24 


Digitized  by  the  Internet  Archive 

in  2012  with  funding  from 

University  of  Illinois  Urbana-Champaign 


http://archive.org/details/1elementsofpetro69grim 


ELEMENTS  OF  THE  PETROGRAPHIC  STUDY  OF  BONDING 

CLAYS  AND  OF  THE  CLAY  SUBSTANCE 

OF  MOLDING  SANDS* 

By  Ralph  E.  Grim 

ABSTRACT 

This  paper  briefly  outlines  the  modern  methods  for  the  study  of  clay  materials,  the  pre- 
vailing concept  of  the  composition  of  clays,  and  the  application  of  modern  clay  researches 
to  studies  of  natural  molding  sands  and  bonding  clays.  An  appended  bibliography  of  a 
selected  list  of  reports  giving  details  and  theoretical  considerations  of  points  discussed  is 
included. 


INTRODUCTION 

It  has  been  known  for  a  long  time  that 
molding  sands  are  essentially  mixtures  of 
silica  sand  and  clay  substance  with  more  or 
less  yellow  or  red  hydrated  ferric  iron  oxide. 
This  fact  is  recognized  in  the  preparation  of 
synthetic  sands  by  mixing  silica  sand  and 
bonding  clay. 

Papers^  have  been  published  in  the  A.F.A. 
Transactions  describing  in  detail  the  char- 
acteristics of  the  silica :  shape  of  grains,  grain 
size  distribution,  etc.  Detailed  information 
on  the  clay  substance  has  not  been  obtained 
and  investigations  of  molding  sands  state 
only  that  the  quality  of  the  clay  substance 
varies  in  different  sands  without  making  any 
attempt  to  study  it  in  detail.  Some  reports 
give  chemical  analyses  of  the  clay,  but  it 
is  generally  recognized  that  chemical  data 
alone  tell  very  little  about  the  character  of 
a  clay. 

Within  the  last  ten  years  a  large  amount 
of  work  has  been  done  on  the  development 
of  methods  for  the  study  of  clays  and  in 
actually  studying  them  by  these  new  meth- 
ods. A  large  number  of  publications  in 
many  scientific  journals  have  reported  new 
and  important  data  on  the  composition  and 
properties  of  clay  materials.  As  a  conse- 
quence of  this  recent  work,  the  character- 
istics  of   the   clay   substance   of   a   molding 


*Reprinted  from  Trans.  Am.  Foundrymen's  Assoc, 
VoL  47,  No.  4,  pp.  895-908,  1940. 

iRies,  H.,  and  Conant,  G.  D.,  The  character  of  sand 
grains:  Trans.  Am.  Foundrymen's  Assoc,  VoL  39.  pp. 
353-392,   193L 

Ries,  H.,  and  Lee,  H.  V.,  Relation  between  shape  of  grain 
and  strength  of  sand:  Trans.  Am.  Foundrymen's  Assoc, 
VoL  39,  pp.  857-860,  193L 

Note:  This  paper  was  presented  at  the  Sand  Research 
session  of  the  43rd  annual  A.F.A.  Convention,  Cincinnati, 
O.,  May  17,  1939. 


sand  can  now  be  determined  as  thoroughly 
as  the  characteristics  of  the  silica  sand  por- 
tion. 

It  is  proposed  in  the  present  paper  to 
briefly  outline  the  modern  methods  for  the 
study  of  clay  materials,  to  state  the  prevail- 
ing concept  of  the  composition  of  clays,  and 
to  point  out  the  application  of  modern  clay 
researches  to  studies  of  natural  molding 
sands  and  bonding  clays.  For  details  and 
theoretical  considerations  of  any  points  con- 
sidered herein,  reference  should  be  made  to 
the  reports  of  the  work  on  which  this  paper 
is  based.  The  appended  bibliography  is  a 
selected  list  of  such  reports. 

CLAY  COMPOSITION 

If  a  pure  clay^  could  be  examined  with 
a  microscope  magnifying  many  thousand 
times,  it  would  be  found  that  it  was  nothing 
but  an  aggregation  of  flake  shaped  particles. 
The  actual  size  of  these  flakes  would  vary 
from  several  microns^  to  less  than  0.1  mi- 
cron in  diameter.  A  working  picture  of  the 
makeup  of  clays  may  be  had  if  one  starts 
with  large  flakes  of  mica  and  then  reduces 
the  size  of  the  flakes  until  each  flake  is  about 
one  micron  in  size.  A  mass  composed  of 
such  flakes  approximates  the  makeup  of  a 
clay.  If  the  flakes  composing  clays  are  ana- 
lyzed, it  is  found  that  they  are  composed  of 
atoms  of  aluminum,  silicon,  oxygen,  and 
hydrogen.  Potassium,  magnesium,  and/or 
iron  would  be  found  in  the  flakes  of  some 
clays. 

'■^The  discussion  of  clay  composition  holds  for  almost  all 
clays.  There  may  be,  however,  a  few  relatively  unim- 
portant clay  materials  which  have  a  composition  slightly 
different  from  that  presented. 

^One  micron  is  one  thousandth  of  a  millimeter  (0.001  mm.) 
or  about  one  twenty-five  thousandth  of  an  inch  (0.00004  in.). 


[5] 


PETROGRAPHIC  STUDY 


The  atoms  have  a  definite  arrangement 
in  the  flakes ;  e.g.,  the  silicon  atoms  have 
fixed  positions  with  respect  to  the  oxygen 
atoms,  the  aluminum  atoms  have  definite 
positions  with  respect  to  the  oxygen  atoms, 
and  so  on  for  the  other  elements.  Substances 
composed  of  atoms  arranged  in  a  definite 
pattern  are  crystalline,  and  hence  the  flakes 
which  compose  clays  are  crystalline.  The 
flakes  are  minute  fragments  of  crystals. 

That  fraction  of  clay  composed  of  parti- 
cles smaller  than  a  given  size  (±1  micron) 
is  the  so-called  colloid  fraction.  The  col- 
loidal material  in  clay  is  made  up  of  crystal- 
line clay  mineral  flakes,  and  it  is  not  an 
amorphous  heterogeneous  mixture  of  silica, 
alumina,  etc. 

There  are  several  important  kinds  of 
flakes  which  make  up  clays.  All  the  different 
kinds  of  flakes  are  composed  of  about  the 
same  atoms,  but  for  each  kind  of  flake  there 
is  a  distinctive  and  different  arrangement  of 
the  atoms.  From  the  viewpoint  of  mineral- 
ogy, the  different  kinds  of  flakes  are  different 
mineral  species  and  warrant  different  min- 
eral names.  These  minerals,  which  are  the 
essential  constituents  of  clays,  are  called  clay 
minerals.  Extensive  analysis  of  clays  has 
shown  that  there  are  only  three  important 
clay  minerals,  and  that  almost  all  clays  are 
composed  essentially  of  extremely  minute 
flake-shaped  particles  of  one  or  more  of  these 
three  minerals  (Table  1).  In  addition  to 
the  clay  minerals,  minor  amounts  of  quartz, 
organic  material,  limonite,  and  other  min- 
erals, are  also  found  in  many  clays.  Some 
examples  of  the  composition  of  clay  mate- 
rials are  as  follows :  Bentonites  are  made  up 
of  extremely  minute  flakes  of  montmoril- 
lonite,  shales  are  composed  usually  of  par- 
ticles of  illite  frequently  with  quartz  and 
other  minor  constituents,  fireclays  are  usual- 
ly mixtures  of  flakes  of  kaolinite  and  illite, 
and  kaolins  and  china  clays  are  made  up 
essentially  of  particles  of  kaolinite. 

Table  1. — Important  Clay  Minerals 

Name  Chemical  Composition 

Kaolinite (OH)8Al4Si40io 

Illite (0H)4Ky  (Al4-Fe4-Mg4-Mg6) 

(Sis-yAly)  O20 
Montmorillonite,  .  (OH)4Al4Si8O20-XH2O 

Since  the  atoms  are  arranged  differently 
in  the  three  important  species  of  clay  min- 
erals,  it   follows   that   their   characteristics, 


and  the  physical  properties  of  the  clay  which 
they  make  up  will  be  different;  e.g.,  the 
characteristics  of  kaolinite  will  be  unlike 
those  of  montmorillonite  and  the  physical 
properties  of  a  clay  composed  of  kaolinite 
will  be  different  from  those  of  a  clay  com- 
posed of  montmorillonite. 

CLAY  MINERAL  PROPERTIES 

In  the  following  discussion  some  of  the 
characteristics  of  the  three  important  clay 
minerals  which  are  related  to  the  properties 
of  natural  molding  sands  and  bonding  clays 
are  considered. 

The  montmorillonite  clay  minerals  usual- 
ly occur  in  particles  less  than  1  to  0.1  micron 
in  diameter,  or  in  larger  particles  which 
are  easily  reduced  to  this  size  when  the  clay 
is  worked  with  water.  Kaolinite  occurs  in 
particles  which  are  rarely  smaller  than  1 
micron  and  which  are  not  easily  broken 
down  by  working  in  water.  Most  illite 
occurs  in  particles  about  the  same  size  as 
kaolinite,  but  there  are  some  clays  in  which 
the  illite  flakes  are  much  smaller.  It  fol- 
lows, therefore,  that  if  a  clay  composed  of 
montmorillonite  is  compared  with  one  com- 
posed of  kaolinite,  the  montmorillonite  clay 
will  be  made  up  of  smaller  flakes  than  the 
kaolinite  clay.  As  a  consequence,  a  given 
amount  of  montmorillonite  clay  will  contain 
a  larger  number  of  flakes,  and  a  larger  total 
flake  surface  than  will  a  kaolinite  clay.  As 
many  of  the  properties  of  clays  are  closely 
related  to  the  size  of  their  component  parti- 
cles, it  follows  that  this  difference  between 
montmorillonite  and  kaolinite  would  cause 
clays  composed  of  montmorillonite  to  have 
properties  that  differ  from  those  composed 
of  kaolinite. 

All  the  clay  minerals  have  the  power  to 
adsorb  certain  ions.  Thus,  if  a  solution  con- 
taining lime  is  passed  through  a  clay  some 
of  the  lime  will  be  taken  out  of  solution  by 
the  clay  unless  the  clay  already  has  all  the 
lime  it  can  adsorb  or  the  lime  solution  is 
too  dilute.  The  adsorbed  ions  are  exchange- 
able, e.g.,  if  a  clay  carrying  lime  is  treated 
with  a  potash  solution,  some  of  the  adsorbed 
lime  will  be  replaced  by  potassium  ions. 
Hydrogen,  sodium,  potassium,  calcium,  and 
magnesium  are  the  common  exchangeable 
ions  held  by  clays.  Montmorillonite  has 
about  ten  times  as  much  capacity  as  kaolinite 
to  hold  adsorbed  ions.  The  capacity  of  illite 
varies;  some  illite  has  the  capacity  of  kaolin- 


OF  BONDING  CLAYS 


ite,  whereas  other  illite  has  several  times 
this  capacity.  The  difference  in  the  adsorp- 
tive  capacity  of  clay  minerals  is  illustrated 
by  their  dye  adsorption;  a  montmorillonite 
clay  will  adsorb  much  more  dye  than  a 
kaolinite  clay. 

It  is  known  in  a  general  way  that  the 
physical  properties  of  clays  vary  with  the 
ion  which  the  clay  carries.  An  example  will 
illustrate  the  point;  if  the  green  and  dry 
compression  strengths  of  two  montmorillo- 
nite clays  are  compared,  one  of  which  carries 
hydrogen  and  the  other  sodium  as  the  ex- 
changeable ion,  it  will  be  found  that  the 
hydrogen  clay  has  higher  green  strength 
than  the  sodium  clay,  and  that  the  hydrogen 
clay  has  lower  dry  strength  than  the  sodium 
clay.  The  exact  variation  of  bonding  prop- 
erties caused  by  various  exchangeable  ions 
is  a  promising  field  of  future  research  which 
remains  to  be  worked  out. 

The  clay  minerals  differ  from  each  other 
in  their  refractoriness  and  in  their  dehydra- 
tion characteristics.  Kaolinite  fuses  at  a 
much  higher  temperature  than  either  mont- 
morillonite or  illite.  Kaolinite  loses  all  of 
its  water  when  it  is  heated  to  about  900° F., 
and  after  subjection  to  this  temperature  does 
not  again  regain  its  moisture  or  its  physical 
properties  when  cooled  to  ordinary  tempera- 
tures. Montmorillonite  may  be  heated  to 
about  1025°F.  before  its  moisture  is  perma- 
nently removed  and  its  physical  properties 
are  destroyed.  The  dehydration  character- 
istics of  illite  are  not  well  known.  The 
above  temperatures  are  equilibrium  temper- 
atures. Montmorillonite,  for  example,  must 
be  held  at  1025°F.  for  a  considerable  period 
of  time  before  it  is  completely  changed. 
When  montmorillonite  is  heated  to  1025°F. 
and  immediately  cooled,  only  a  small  amount 
of  it  is  irreversibly  dehydrated. 

It  is  clear  from  the  foregoing  considera- 
tions that  clays  composed  of  different  clay 
minerals  must  have  different  properties.  A 
large  amount  of  work  must  be  done  before 
the  relation  between  the  various  clay  min- 
erals and  bonding  properties  are  well  under- 
stood, but  some  information  on  this  subject 
is  available.  It  is  known,  for  example,  that 
montmorillonite  clays  have  higher  compres- 
sion strengths  than  kaolinite  clays,  and  that 
some  illite  clays  are  weak,  whereas  others 
have  high  strength.  Thus,  a  mixture  of  95 
per  cent  sand  and  5  per  cent  clay  composed 
of  montmorillonite  will  have  greater  green 


and  dry  strengths  than  a  mixture  of  95  per 
cent  sand  and  5  per  cent  kaolinite  clay  at 
their  optimum  moistures.  The  properties  of 
bonding  clays  depend,  therefore,  on  the  clay 
minerals  of  which  they  are  composed.  Also, 
as  brought  out  before,  the  properties  will 
vary  depending  on  the  exchangeable  ions 
which  they  contain. 

Similarly,  it  is  clear  that  two  natural 
molding  sands  with  the  same  fineness  char- 
acteristics, and  the  same  amount  of  clay  will 
not  necessarily  have  the  same  strength.  In 
fact  the  natural  sands  can  not  have  the  same 
strength  unless  their  clay  is  made  up  of  the 
same  clay  mineral  carrying  the  same  ex- 
changeable base.  It  is  obvious,  then,  that 
the  properties  of  two  sands  cannot  well  be 
compared  without  information  on  the  char- 
acter of  their  clay  mineral  content. 

DETERMINATION  OF  MINERAL 
COMPOSITION 

It  is  easy  to  study  the  characteristics  of 
the  sand  grains  and  of  the  coarse  silt  in 
molding  sands  with  the  microscope.  Clays 
generally  or  the  clay  substance  of  molding 
sands  cannot  be  studied  so  easily  because 
they  are  composed  of  particles  which  are  so 
small  that  they  cannot  readily  be  seen  with 
the  microscope  even  using  very  high  mag- 
nification, much  less  identified  and  studied. 
These  very  small  particles  are  mostly  the 
clay  mineral  flakes  just  mentioned,  and  only 
lately  has  it  been  possible  to  devise  tech- 
niques for  their  adequate  study.  In  the  fol- 
lowing paragraphs  these  techniques  are  re- 
viewed briefly. 

X-RAY  Method 

When  a  beam  of  x-rays  is  passed  through 
a  crystalline  substance,  the  beam  is  reflected 
and  refracted  from  the  planes  of  atoms 
which  make  up  the  crystal.  The  x-rays 
emerge  from  the  crystal  as  a  series  of  beams 
which  can  be  recorded  on  a  photographic 
film  as  a  series  of  lines  (fig.  1 )  or  dots, 
depending  on  the  details  of  the  procedure 
followed  and  the  character  of  the  material. 
The  position,  intensity,  and  number  of 
beams  emerging  from  any  crystalline  sub- 
stance depend  on  the  character  of  its  atoms 
and  their  arrangement  in  the  substance. 
Thus,  it  follows  that  if  two  crystalline  sub- 
stances with  different  atomic  structures  are 
placed    in    front    of    x-ray    beams    and    the 


PETROGRAPHIC  STUDY 


KAOLJNITE 


MONTMGRILLONITE 


ILLITE 


r-'-%|    ■if'^. 


Fig.  1— X-ray  Diffraction  Patterns.     (After  W.  Noll.,  Ber.  Deut.  Keram.  Qes.  19,  p.  181,  1938) 


emerging  beams  are  recorded  on  photo- 
graphic films,  the  pattern  of  the  lines  on  the 
films  will  be  different. 

The  clay  minerals  have  different  atomic 
structures  and,  therefore,  yield  different 
x-ray  patterns.  Thus,  if  a  beam  of  x-rays 
is  sent  through  a  clay  sample  and  the  emerg- 
ing beams  recorded,  it  is  possible  to  deter- 
mine from  the  recorded  beams  the  minerals 
which  make  up  the  clay,  regardless  of  the 
fact  that  the  particles  composing  the  clay 
are  extremely  small.  The  identification  of 
the  minerals  is  made  by  comparing  the  pat- 
tern from  the  clay  with  patterns  of  known 
pure  mineral  material. 

One  of  the  greatest  difficulties  in  the  iden- 
tification of  the  constituents  of  clays  has 
been  to  obtain  pure  samples  of  many  of  the 
minerals  found  in  clay  for  determining 
standard  analytical  data.  Thus,  it  is  difficult 
to  obtain  pure  illite  for  the  study  of  its 
x-ray,  optical,  chemical,  and  other  proper- 
ties which  can  be  used  as  a  basis  of  compari- 
son and  hence  for  the  identification  of  illite 
in  clays  generally. 

It  is  frequently  possible  to  work  out  the 
exact  arrangement  of  the  atoms  within  a 
crystal  from  the  pattern  of  the  emerging 
beams  of  x-rays.  In  recent  years  a  large 
body  of  data  has  become  available  on  the 
arrangement  of  the  atoms  within  the  various 
clay  minerals.  This  work  is  providing,  per- 
haps for  the  first  time,  a  fundamental,  basic 
explanation  of  the  physical  properties  of 
clays. 


Microscopic  Method 

One  difference  between  crystalline  and 
noncrystalline  substances  is  that  in  crystals 
the  velocity  of  light  traveling  through  them 
depends  on  the  direction  of  the  path  of  light. 
In  a  flake  of  mica  for  example,  light  passing 
through  the  flake  at  right  angles  to  the  flake 
surface  has  a  different  velocity  than  light 
passing  through  parallel  to  the  flake.  An- 
other character  of  crystalline  material  is 
that  light  passing  through  it  is  polarized, 
i.e.,  broken  up  into  light  vibrating  in  only 
one  plane.  As  a  result  of  these  phenomena 
crystalline  substances  have  certain  optical 
properties.  The  optical  properties  of  crys- 
tals are  dependent  on  their  atomic  structure 
and,  therefore,  materials  with  different  crys- 
tal structures,  such  as  the  clay  minerals, 
have  different  optical  properties.  The  petro- 
graphic  microscope  is  constructed  so  that 
optical  properties  can  be  measured  and,  as  a 
consequence,  minerals  can  be  identified.  Sat- 
isfactory determinations,  however,  can  only 
be  made  on  individual  particles  coarser  than 
about  1  micron,  which  is  larger  than  many 
of  the  clay  mineral  particles  in  clays.  This 
limitation  to  the  application  of  petrographic 
microscopic  technique  in  the  study  of  clays 
has  been  overcome  by  taking  advantage  of 
the  flake  shape  of  the  clay  mineral  particles. 
Aggregates  of  clay  minerals  can  be  prepared 
in  such  a  way  that  the  flakes  rest  on  top  of 
each  other  in  the  same  relative  crystallo- 
graphic  position.  The  optical  properties  of 
the  aggregates  can  be  measured  as  if  they 


OF  BONDING  CLAtS 


12 


, 

MOK 

TMORI 

LLONl 

TE 

y 

> 

/^ 

^ 

— 

^ 

z' 

^ 

i 

-ILL 

ITE 

/ 

/ 

/ 

1 

^ 

^ 

^ 

♦-KAC 

LINIT 

E 

^ 

J 

" 

200   300   400   500   600   700 
TEMPERATURE  -  DEGREES  C 

Fig.  2- — ^Dehydration  Curves 


800       900 


were  large  individual  cr3^stals.  In  this  way 
the  component  particles  can  be  identified 
even  though  they  are  too  small  to  be  seen 
individually.  The  aggregates  are  prepared 
by  carefully  drying  suspensions  of  the  clay. 

Dehydration  Method 

The  clay  minerals  contain  different 
amounts  of  water,  and  they  lose  their  water 
at  different  temperatures  when  heated  (fig. 
2).  Thus,  it  would  seem  possible  to  deter- 
mine which  clay  minerals  are  present  in  a 
clay  by  determining  the  amount  of  water 
present  and  the  loss  of  water  as  the  clay  is 
heated.  The  method  has  been  used  in  clay 
studies,  but  it  must  be  used  with  caution 
chiefly  because  the  dehydration  character- 
istics of  the  clay  minerals  vary  with  the  size 
of  the  particles  in  which  they  occur.  It  has 
been  shown,  for  example,  that  extremely 
finely  ground  mica  has  dehydration  proper- 
ties that  differ  from  those  of  the  same  mica 
composed  of  coarser  particles. 

Chemical  Method 

Past  studies  of  clay  materials  have  fre- 
quently included  chemical  analyses.  In  gen- 
eral, chemical  analyses  alone  do  not  permit 


an  identification  of  the  mineral  components 
of  clay  substances.  Such  determinations  give 
values  for  the  amount  of  silica,  alumina, 
etc.,  in  the  substance  but  do  not  indicate 
in  what  minerals  they  are  present.  There- 
fore, the  chemical  data  do  not  give  informa- 
tion on  the  units  making  up  the  clay  which 
largely  determine  its  properties,  i.e.,  the  clay 
minerals.  Along  with  x-ray  and  optical 
analyses,  chemical  data  are  helpful ;  alone 
they  have  little  value. 

Application  of  Present  Methods 

The  study  of  clay  materials  has  shown 
that  they  are  frequently  composed  of  mix- 
tures of  clay  minerals.  Clay  minerals  occur- 
ring in  mixtures  are  particularly  difficult  to 
study  and  identify  because,  although  the 
optical  and  x-ray  properties  of  the  clay  min- 
erals on  which  identification  is  based  are 
different,  the  differences  are  not  great  and 
frequently  the  analytical  data  for  mixtures 
cannot  be  interpreted  readily.  For  example, 
x-ray  and  optical  analytical  data  for  a  clay 
composed  of  a  large  proportion  of  one  clay 
mineral,  and  a  minor  amount  of  another  clay 
mineral,  may  not  positively  indicate  the 
presence  of  the  minor  component.  To  over- 
come this  difficulty,  a  fractionation  proced- 


10 


PETROGRAPHIC  STUDY 


ure  has  been  developed  which  literally  takes 
the  cla}^  apart  into  fractions  of  its  component 
minerals.  The  object  is  to  isolate  the  clay 
minerals  in  fractions  of  sufficient  purity  so 
that  they  can  be  identified  positively. 

The  general  procedure  is  as  follows:  The 
material  is  disaggregated  and  placed  in  sus- 
pension in  water,  using  ammonia  as  the 
dispersing  agent.  The  suspension  is  allowed 
to  stand  until  the  material  coarser  than  2 
microns  has  settled  out.  The  suspension 
carrying  the  — 2  micron  particles  then  is 
removed  and  saved,  and  the  settled  material 
again  is  placed  in  suspension  and  allowed  to 
stand  until  particles  coarser  than  2  microns 
have  settled.  This  process  is  repeated  until 
the  material  coarser  than  2  microns  has  been 
freed  of  particles  smaller  than  this  size, 
i.e.,  the  sample  has  been  split  into  a  fraction 
carrying  -\-2  micron  particles  and  a  suspen- 
sion carrying  finer  particles.  The  particles 
in  the  coarse  fraction  can  be  identified  and 
studied  individually  by  means  of  the  petro- 
graphic  microscope. 

Oriented  aggregates  are  prepared  of  the 
material  in  the  suspension  and  they  are 
studied  with  the  petrographic  microscope. 
If  the  finest  fraction  of  the  clay  is  composed 
of  only  one  clay  mineral,  it  can  be  studied 
adequately  by  x-ray  and  optical  analyses  of 
the  entire  — 2  micron  grade  size.  If  the 
finest  grade  size  is  a  mixture  of  clay  min- 
erals, it  may  be  necessary  to  fractionate  the 
suspension  by  sedimentation  (e.g.,  pipette 
analysis)  or  by  supercentrifuge  processes. 
By  running  the  suspension  through  a  super- 
centrifuge,  it  is  possible  to  separate  the  parti- 
cles of  the  suspension  into  size  fractions. 
Frequently,  fractions  containing  particles  2 
to  1  microns,  1  to  0.1  micron,  and  — 0.1 
micron  are  obtained.  Because  the  clay  min- 
erals tend  to  break  down  into  different  sizes, 
a  concentration  of  clay  minerals  will  be 
effected  by  such  a  fractionation.  For  exam- 
ple, if  the  suspension  contained  kaolinite  and 
montmorillonite,  the  kaolinite  would  tend  to 
be  concentrated  in  the  +1  micron  fraction 
and  the  montmorillonite  would  be  concen- 
treted  in  the.-—]  micron  fractions.  Frac- 
tions of  relatively  pure  clay  minerals  would 
be  obtained  which  would  permit  accurate 
identification  of  the  constituents  of  the  clay. 

Thus  by  taking  a  clay  material  apart  a 
complete  picture  of  its  makeup  can  be  ob- 
tained. Also  the  technique  gives  some  infor- 
mation on  the  size  distribution  of  the  min- 


erals making  up  the  material.  Such  data  on 
the  makeup  of  clays  and  molding  sands  arc 
the  fundamentals  on  which  studies  of  the 
causes  of  variation  in  properties  must  be 
based.  They  are  the  necessary  starting  point 
for  investigations  of  why  molding  sands  and 
bonding  clays  have  the  properties  they  do, 
and  what  determines  their  variations.  Until 
the  factors  controlling  the  properties  of 
sands  are  understood,  the  sands  themselves 
cannot  be  controlled  with  complete  satis- 
faction. 


SELECTED   BIBLIOGRAPHY 

Bragg,  W.,  Clay:  Royal  Institution  of  Great 
Britain,  Nov.  19,  1937. 

Bray,  R.  H.,  Grim,  R.  E.,  and  Kerr,  P.  F.,  Appli- 
cation of  clay  mineral  technique  to  Illinois'  clay  and 
shale:  Bull.  Geol.  Soc.  of  Am.  46,  pp.  1909-1926, 
1935. 

Correns,  C.  W.,  The  petrography  of  clay:  Natur- 
wiss.    24,  pp.  117-124,  1936. 

Correns,  C.  W.,  and  Mehmel,  M.,  On  the  optical 
and  X-ray  data  for  kaolinite,  halloysite,  and  mont- 
morillonite:   Zeit.  f.  Krist.    94,  pp.  337-348,  1936. 

Endell,  K.,  Hofmann,  U.,  and  Wilm,  D.,  The 
nature  of  ceramic  clav:  Ber.  deut.  keram.  Ges. 
14,  pp.  407-438,  1933.' 

von  Engelhardt,  W.,  The  silicate  clay  minerals: 
Fort.  Min.  Krist.  u.  Pet.  21,  pp.  276-337,  1937. 

Grim,  R.  E.,  Relation  of  the  composition  to  the 
properties  of  clays:  Jour.  Am.  Cer.  Soc.  22,  pp. 
141-151,  1939. 

Grim,  R.  E.,  and  Bray,  R.  H.,  The  mineral  con- 
stitution of  various  ceramic  clays:  Jour.  Am.  Cer. 
Soc.  19,  pp.  307-315,  1936. 

Grim,  R.  E.,  Bray,  R.  H.,  and  Bradley,  W.  F., 
The  constitution  of  bond  clays  and  its  influence  on 
bonding  properties:  Trans.  Am.  Foundrymen's 
Assoc.  44,  pp.  211-228,  1936. 

Grim,  R.  E.,  Bray,  R.  H.,  and  Bradley,  W.  F., 
The  mica  in  argillaceous  sediments:  Am.  Min.  22, 
pp.  813-829,  1937. 

Hofmann,  U.,  Endell,  K.,  and  Wilm,  D.,  X-ray 
and  colloid  chemical  study  of  clav:  Angew.  chem. 
14,  pp.  539-547,  1934. 

Hendricks,  S.  B.,  and  Fry,  W.  H.,  The  results  of 
X-ray  and  microscopical  examinations  of  soil 
colloids:      Soil  Sci.   29,  pp.  457-478,   1930. 

Kelley,  W.  P.,  Jenny,  H.,  and  Brown,  S.  M., 
Hydration  of  minerals  and  soil  colloids  in  relation  to 
crystal  structure:  Soil  Sci.  41,  pp.  259-274,  1936. 

Kerr,  P.  F.,  A  decade  of  research  on  the  nature 
of  clay:   Jour.  Am.  Cer.  Soc.  21,  pp.  267-286,  1938. 

de  Lapparent,  J.,  Structural  formulae  and  classi- 
fication of  clays:  Zeit.  f.  Krist.  98,  pp.  233-258, 
1937. 

Marshall,  C.  E.,  The  chemical  constitution  as 
related  to  the  physical  properties  of  clavs:  Trans. 
Cer.  Soc.  (Eng.)  35,  pp.  401-411,  1936. 

Mehmel,  M.,  Water  content  of  kaolinite,  hallo- 
site,  and  montmorillonite:  Chem.  d.  Erde.  11,  pp. 
1-16,  1937. 

Noll,  W.,  Minerals  of  the  system  Al203-Si02-H20: 
Neues  Jahrb.  f.  Min.  Beilage  Bd.  70  Abt.  A.,  pp. 
65-115,    1935. 


OF  BONDING  CLAYS 


11 


Orcel,  J.,  The  use  of  differential  thermal  analysis 
in  determining  the  constituents  of  clays,  laterites, 
and  bauxites:  Int.  Congress  Min.  Met.  I,  pp.  359- 
371,1935. 

Pauling,  L.,  The  structure  of  micas  and  related 
minerals:  Proc.  Nat.  Acad,  of  Sci.  16,  pp.  123-129, 
1930. 

Ross,  C.  S.,  and  Kerr,  P.  F.,  The  clay  minerals 
and  their  identity:  Jour.  Sed.  Petrog.  1,  pp.  55-65, 
1931. 

Ross,  C.  S.,  and  Kerr,  P.  F.,  The  kaolin  minerals: 
U.  S.  Geol.  Survey,  Prof.  Paper  165  E,  1931. 

Ross,  C.  S.,  and  Shannon,  E.  V.,  Minerals  of 
bentonite  and  related  clays  and  their  physical 
properties:    Jour.  Am.  Cer.  Soc.  9,  pp.  77-96,  1926. 


DISCUSSION 


Presiding:  H.  S.  Washburn,  Plainville  Casting 
Co.,  Plainville,  Conn. 

Dr.  H.  Ries^:  We  all  realize  that  this  subject  is  a 
very  deep  one  and  it  may  seem  intensely  theoretical, 
but  I  believe  it  brings  out  one  very  important  point, 
and  that  is  that  as  we  go  farther  with  the  study  and 
the  research  on  molding  sands,  that  we  are  getting 
down  into  finer  and  finer  details.  I  presume  when 
we  first  started  on  molding  sands  back  in  1921,  at  a 
time  when  I  think  all  of  us  will  admit  now  we  did 
not  know  anything  about  them- — we  thought  we 
did,  but  we  have  found  out  since  how  little  we  ac- 
tually did  know — we  did  not  think  of  these  very 
small  details.  We  knew,  of  course,  that  sands  had 
bonds  and  that  these  bonds  behaved  in  different 
ways.  Now,  we  are  coming  to  a  point  where  we  are 
beginning  to  study  these  bonds  in  greater  detail. 
Of  course,  the  study  of  them  requires  a  considerable 
expertness,  particularly  when  you  have  to  use  these 
high-powered,  complicated  microscopes,  but,  as 
Dr.  Grim  has  pointed  out,  we  do  have  these  different 
clay  minerals  in  the  bond,  and  it  has  been  shown 
that  they  have  different  bonding  properties,  and  so 
that  would  tend  to  explain  why  certain  clays  might 
be  more  efficient  as  bonds  than  others. 

But  there  is  another  interesting  point  which  I 
think  he  has  brought  out — I  am  not  sure  whether  he 
mentioned  these  by  name — namely  base  changes, 
the  possibility  of  kicking  out  one  ion  in  a  clay  and 
substituting  another  ion  for  it,  as,  for  instance,  the 
comparison  he  drew  in  the  case  of  this  water  soften- 
ing material,  the  zeolites. 

To  put  it  in  plain  language,  we  might  say  we  give 
the  clay  a  dose  of  salts  and,  as  a  result  of  that,  it 
behaves  differently  from  what  it  did  before. 

That  opens  up  an  interesting  field.  It  is  possible 
that  if  a  bonding  clay  does  not  behave  just  right, 
perhaps  by  treating  it  with  some  chemical  and 
getting  the  ions  of  this  chemical  to  take  the  place 
of  certain  ones  which  were  in  the  clay,  we  may  im- 
prove its  properties.  Of  course,  whether  we  do  it  or 
not  may  be  influenced  somewhat  by  the  expense 
which  might  be  Incurred  by  doing  so,  but  I  think 
it  is  something  that  will  be  worth  trying  in  the 
future. 


^Cornell  University,  Ithaca,  N.  Y. 


Member:  In  the  very  descriptive  information 
as  to  the  constitution  of  these  various  layers,  Mr. 
Grim  pointed  out  that  in  certain  clays  the  struc- 
ture shows  a  contact  point  of,  in  one  place  OH  and 
the  other  point,  O.  Does  he  by  these  terms  indicate 
that  there  is  actually  atomic  OH  or  atomic  O? 
That  is,  is  this  contact  point  based  on  a  chemical 
reaction? 

Dr.  Grim:  The  OH  and  the  O  are  not  in  contact. 
They  are  parts  of  different  units  that  tend  to  make 
up  the  whole  lattice  structure.  The  theory  of  the 
thing  is  that  because  you  have  the  OH  in  the  top 
layer  of  one  kaolinite  unit  and  O  in  the  bottom 
layer  of  the  next  unit,  there  is  a  tendency  to  hold 
the  units  in  a  relatively  fixed  position  which  is  more 
secure  than  you  would  have  if  O  and  O  were  in 
adjacent  layers  of  two  units  (e.g.  montmorillonite). 

Member:  That  supposedly  is  based  on  the  affinity 
of  those  elements  for  each  other? 

Dr.  Grim:   Yes,  that  is  the  basis  for  it. 

Member:  Dr.  Grim  could  you  show  by  a  molecu- 
lar diagram  what  happens  when  the  clay  substance 
loses  its  water?    In  other  words,  dehydration. 

Dr.  Grim:  That  depends  on  what  sort  of  clay 
you  are  talking  about.  In  the  case  of  montmorillon- 
ite, the  lattice  structure  seems  to  be  retained  in  all 
of  its  attributes  up  to  about  550°C.  That  is  about 
1025°F.  There  may  be  a  considerable  amount  of 
water  present  in  montmorillonite  between  the 
structural  units  but  that  is  lost  at  relatively  low 
temperatures,  perhaps  of  the  order  of  magnitude 
of  220  or  250°F.  Above  550°C.  the  whole  lattice 
tends  to  break  down  and  different  constituents  are 
formed  before  eventual  fusion.  Exactly  what  the 
mineralogical  changes  are  that  take  place  when 
montmorillonite  and  illite  break  down,  are  not 
known,  but  it  is  quite  well  known  for  kaolinite  be- 
cause the  ceramists  have  worked  it  out  in  their  study 
of  China  clay.  There  is  a  change  to  cristobalite, 
which  is  a  high  temperature  form  of  quartz,  and 
mullite,  which  is  aluminum  silicate.  As  the  temper- 
ature is  raised  above  the  temperature  where  all  the 
water  is  lost,  mullite  and  cristobalite  form  eventually 
and  then  later  fusion  takes  place.  To  be  perfectly 
correct,  there  is  some  dispute  among  ceramists  as  to 
the  exact  sequence  of  changes  that  take  place  within 
that  range  when  all  the  water  is  gone  and  before 
the  new  crystalline  material  develops.  It  is  difficult 
to  get  any  positive  evidence  on  which  to  identify  the 
material.  X-ray  pictures  provide  patterns  that  are 
very  difficult  to  interpret  and  you  can  not  see  much 
under  the  microscope. 

Member:  Dr.  Grim  showed  the  difference  be- 
tween the  adjacent  layers  of  kaolinite  as  differing 
from  montmorillonite  and  their  apparent  attraction 
for  each  other.  What  would  be  the  case  there  in  the 
instance  of  the  illite  as  regards  the  adjacent  oxygen 
atoms? 

Dr.  Grim:  Illite  differs  from  montmorillonite  in 
that  some  of  the  silicon  atoms  are  replaced  by 
aluminum  atoms  in  the  silica  tetrahedral  sheet.  In 
the  lattice  structure,  silicon  carries  four  charges  and 
aluminum  carries  three.  Every  time  a  silicon  is  re- 
placed by  an  aluminum,  there  is  one  excess  charge 
in  the  lattice  and  that  excess  charge  is  usually  com- 
pensated by  an  atom  of  potash  that  occurs  on  top 
of  the  silica  sheet.  The  potash  ions  in  between  the 
silica  sheets  act  as  sort  of  a  bridge  that  binds  them 
together,  so  that  they  do  not  swell  and  come  apart 
easilv. 


12 


MINERAL  COMPOSITION  AND  TEXTURE 


MINERAL  COMPOSITION  AND  TEXTURE  OF  THE  CLAY 
SUBSTANCE  OF  NATURAL  MOLDING  SANDS f 


By  Ralph  E.  G 


RIM^    AN 


D    Ci 


E.  Schubert** 


ABSTRACT 

The  authors  experimented  with  samples  of  eight  different  molding  sands.  Six  of  these 
sands  are  in  commercial  use  and  two  are  potential  Illinois  molding  sands.  The  size-grade 
distribution  of  the  clay  substance  is  determined,  the  minerals  making  up  the  clay  sub- 
stance of  each  sand  were  identified,  and  the  distribution  of  the  important  mineral  con- 
stituents with  respect  to  particle  size  was  determined.  Curves  of  the  frequency  distribu- 
tion of  the  various  samples  are  included. 


INTRODUCTION 

The  clay  substance  of  a  molding  sand  is 
defined  by  the  American  Foundrymen's 
Association^  as  that  part  occurring  in  parti- 
cles less  than  0.02  mm.  in  diameter.  The 
physical  properties  of  any  sand  are  closely 
related  to  the  detailed  characteristics  of  its 
clay  substance'  and,  consequently,  properties 
cannot  be  well  understood  until  the  clay 
substance  has  been  studied  in  detail. 

In  the  researches  herein  reported,  the  size- 
grade  distribution  of  the  clay  substance  was 
determined  for  each  one  of  a  number  of 
molding  sands  selected  because  the  general 
character  of  their  clay  was  thought  to  vary. 
Also,  the  minerals  which  make  up  the  clay 
substance  of  each  molding  sand  were  identi- 
fied and  the  distribution  of  the  important 
mineral  constituents  with  respect  to  particle 
size  was  determined. 

Objective 

The  objective  of  the  present  study  was 
to  obtain  detailed  analytical  data  for  the 
clay  substance  of  various  natural  molding 
sands  and  thereby  to  develop  a  basis  for  a 
study  of  the  factors  controlling  some  of  the 
physical  properties  of  natural  sands. 


iTesting  and  grading  molding  sands  and  clays:  Am. 
Foundrymen's  Assoc,  1938  edition,  pp.  26-27,   157-158. 

^Throughout  this  report  "clay  substance"  is  used  as 
defined  by  the  American  Foundrymen's  Association. 

tReprinted  from  Trans.  Am.  Foundrymen's  Assoc, 
Vol.  47,  No.  4,  pp.  935-53,  1940. 

*Petrographer,   Illinois  State  Geological  Survey. 

**Associate  in  Mechanical  Engineering,  University  of 
Illinois. 

Note:  This  paper  was  presented  before  the  Sand  Re- 
search Session  of  the  43rd  Annual  A.F.A.  Convention, 
Cincinnati,  O.,  May  17,  1939. 


Sands  Investigated 

The  molding  sands  investigated  are  listed 
in  Table  1,  together  with  their  content  of 
clay  substance  and  their  green  compression 
strength  at  optimum  moisture.  Six  of  the 
samples  are  molding  sands  in  commercial 
use,  and  two  samples  are  potential  Illinois 
molding  sands  obtained  by  the  Illinois  Geo- 
logical Survey  in  a  recent  study  of  the  mold- 
ing sand  resources  of  Illinois, 

PROCEDURE 

The  amount  of  clay  substance  was  deter- 
mined by  the  standard  method  of  the  Ameri- 
can Foundrvmen's  Association.^ 


'able  1, 


-Clay  Substance  and  Green  Compression 
Strength  of  Molding  Sands 


Green   compression 

Sample 

Clay  substance 

at  optimum 

No. 

Per  cent 

moisture 
lb.  per  sq.  in. 

1 

20.0 

18.0 

2 

10.8 

7.5 

3 

19.2 

13.5 

4 

21.2 

13.0 

5 

16.8 

11.0 

6 

6.6 

12.5 

7 

26.0 

14.5 

8 

46.6 

21.0 

The  size-grade  distribution  within  the 
clay  substance  was  determined  on  an  aliquot 
of  the  original  sample  by  pipette  method,  as 
applied  to  molding  sands." 

^Jackson,  C.  E.,  and  Saeger,  C.  M.  Jr.,  Use  of  pipette 
in  the  fineness  test  of  molding  sands:  U.  S.  Bur.  Standards, 
Jour,  of  Research  14,  1935,  pp.  59-66. 


CLAY  SUBSTANCE  OF  MOLDING  SANDS 


13 


In  order  to  obtain  samples  for  mineralog- 
ical  study,  another  aliquot  of  the  original 
sample  was  dispersed  in  water  using 
NH4OH  as  the  dispersing  agent.  The  sus- 
pension was  then  allowed  to  stand  until 
particles  larger  than  0.02  mm.  had  settled 
out.  The  suspension  carrying  — 0.02  mm. 
material  was  then  removed  and  allowed  to 
stand  until  the  -|-0-01  mm.  particles  had 
settled  out.  The  particles  settling  out  of 
this  suspension  ranged  in  size  from  0.02 
mm.  to  0.01  mm.  contaminated  by  some 
finer  material.  By  repeatedly  placing  this 
settled  material  into  suspension  and  remov- 
ing the  —0.01  mm.  particles,  a  fraction 
containing  only  grains  ranging  from  0.02 
mm.  to  0.01  mm.  was  obtained.  By  a  sim- 
ilar procedure,  but  with  different  settling 
times,  fractions  containing  particles  from 
0.01  to  0.005  mm.,  0.005  to  0.002  mm., 
—  0.002  mm.,  and  — 0.001  mm.  were  ob- 
tained. NH4OH  was  used  as  the  dispersing 
agent,  because  on  evaporation  no  salt  is  left 
as  a  residue. 

The  minerals  making  up  the  fractions 
coarser  than  0.002  mm.  were  identified  on 
the  basis  of  their  optical  characteristics  using 
the  petrographic  microscope.  The  compo- 
nents of  the  fractions  finer  than  0.002  mm. 
were  identified  on  the  basis  of  their  optical 
and  x-ray  characteristics. 

Determinations  of  green  compression 
strength  and  fineness  characteristics  were 
made  by  the  standard  A.  F.  A.  procedures. 

PARTICLE  SIZE  ANALYSES 

The  results  of  the  determinations  of  size- 
grade  distribution  were  plotted  in  the  form 
of  cumulative  curves  on  semi-logarithmic 
paper.  From  the  cumulative  curve  of  each 
sample,  a  frequency  distribution  curve  (figs. 
lA  to  8A)  was  constructed  by  the  graphic 
diiiferentiation  method  described  by  Krum- 
bein.*  The  frequency  curves  show  the  rela- 
tive abundance  of  various  size  grades  by  the 
area  under  the  curve.  For  example,  the  per- 
centage of  material  between  0.005  and  0.002 
mm.  in  any  sample  is  obtained  by  dividing 
that  portion  of  the  area  under  the  curve 
which  is  bounded  by  vertical  lines  construct- 
ed at  the  0.005  and  0.002  mm.  divisions  of 
the  horizontal  axis  by  the  total  area  under 
the  curve;  e.g.,  in  figure  lA,  15  per  cent 
of  the  total   area  under  the  curve  lies   be- 


tween the  0.005  and  0.002  mm.  verticals, 
and  therefore  15  per  cent  of  the  sample 
occurs  in  the  0.005  to  0.002  mm.  grade  size. 
Thus  the  relative  abundance  of  any  size  can 
easily  be  visualized  or  accurately  deter- 
mined. 

The  relative  amount  of  — 0.0005  mm. 
material  is  represented  by  the  area  of  the 
rectogram  thus, 


Per  cent  material- 
0.0005  mm. 


Area  of  rectogram 


Area  beneath  curve  including 
area  of  rectogram 


If  the  — 0.0005  mm.  fractions  were  pre- 
sented as  a  continuation  of  the  curve  rather 
than  as  a  rectogram,  the  curves  would  ex- 
tend to  infinity  since  the  — 0.0005  mm. 
fraction  contains  all  material  from  0.0005 
mm.  to  an  infinitely  small  particle  size. 

The  chief  components  of  the  clay  sub- 
stance of  the  molding  sands  studied  are 
quartz,  clay  minerals,  and  limonite.'"'  The 
distribution  and  relative  abundance  of  the 
quartz  and  clay  minerals  plus  limonite  are 
shown  by  figures  IB,  C  to  8B,  C.  The  clay 
minerals  and  limonite  are  shown  together 
because  together  they  are  chiefly  responsible 
for  the  strength  properties  of  the  sand,  and 
because  they  cannot  well  be  separated  in 
such  material  on  an  accurate  quantitative 
basis. 

In  figures  IB,  C  to  8B,  C  the  distribution 
curves  of  the  entire  clay  substance  are 
broken  down  into  two  curves  representing, 
respectively,  the  distribution  of  quartz  and 
the  clay  minerals  plus  limonite.  The  dis- 
tribution curves  for  the  total  clay  substance 
are  constructed  on  the  basis  of  weight  analy- 
ses. The  curves  for  the  component  mineral 
are  constructed  on  the  basis  of  numerical 
values.  The  shape  and  specific  gravity  of 
the  particles  are  sufficiently  alike  so  that  the 
curves  are  comparable. 

An  analysis  of  figures  lA,  B,  C  will 
illustrate  the  data  contained  in  the  curves. 
The  area  beneath  the  curve  for  the  clay 
minerals  plus  limonite;  added  to  the  area 
beneath  the  curve  for  quartz  is  equal  to  the 
area  beneath  the  curve  for  the  total  clay 
substance,  and  thus  in  the  claj^  substance : 

Per  cent  Area  beneath  quartz  curve 

quartz  = 

Area  beneath  curve  for  total  clay 
substance 


^Krumbein,  W.  C,  Size  frequency  distribution  of  sedi- 
ments: Jour.  Sed.  Petrology,  vol.  4,  1934,  pp.  65-77. 


■"'Limonite  is  used  througliout  the  report  for  the  hydrated 
ferric  iron  oxide  compounds  present  in  tlie  clay  substance. 


14 


MINERAL  COMPOSITION  AND  TEXTURE 


A 

TOTAL  CLAY 

SUB5TANC 

E 

r^ 

V 

1 

B 

CLAY    MINERikLS   PLUS 

LIMONITE 

>- 
U 

UJ 

a 

s. 

r^ 

C 

QUARTZ 

^ 



.02  .01  .005  .00  2  .001  .0005 

LOG    DIAMETER    IN    MM. 

Fig.  1 — Frequency  Distribution  Curves  for  Sample  1 


"^ 

^N 

TOTAL    CLAY 

SUBSTANC 

E 

/ 

\ 

/ 

\ 

V 

\^ 

^^ 

1 

>- 

B 

.^^ 

CLAY    MINER-* 

,LS     PLUS 

LIMONITE 

UJ 

a 

/ 

\ 

a. 

/ 

^^^^^..^^^^ 

~~~^ 

1 

c 

__^ 

1 

OUARTZ 

/^ 

\ 

1 

^-^.. 

02  .01 


.005  .002  .001  .0005 

LOG     DIAMETER    IN     MM. 


Fig.  2 — Frequency  Distribution  Curves  for  Sample  2. 


CLAY  SUBSTANCE  OF  MOLDING  SANDS 


15 


A    /'^ 

TOTAL   CLAY 

SUBSTAN 

CE 

/ 

/ 

/ 

/ 

\ 

^-^_ 



1 

B 

CLAY    MINER; 

LS     PLUS 

LIMONITE 

\ 

\ 

\, 

-^ 

1 

c 

QUARTZ 

\ 

1 

005  002  .001 

LOG     DIAMETER     IN  MM 


.0005 


Fig.  3 — Frequency  Distribution  Curves  for  Sample  3. 


A 

TOTAL    CLAY 

SUBSTAN ( 

:e 

f-^ 

^^ 

1 

--^.__ 

o 

B 

CLAY   MINER/ 

LS   PLUS 

LIMONITE 

~~" 

u 

o 

UJ 

a. 
u 

/ 

c 

QUARTZ 

/x 

/ 

"■~' — 



.02 


.005  .002  .001  .0005 

LOG    DIAMETER    IN   MM. 


Fig.  4 — Frequency  Distrihution  Curves  for  Sample  4. 


16 


MINERAL  COMPOSITION  AND  TEXTURE 


V\, 

TOTAL   CLAY 

SUBSTANCE 

/  \ 

y^ 

B 

CLAY    MINER  kLS    PLIJS 

LIMONITE 

^ 

A 

QUARTZ 

/  ^ 

, 

.005  .002  .oor 

LOG    DIAMETER     IN    MM. 


.0005 


Fig.  5 — Frequency  Distribution  Curves  for  Sample  5. 


A 

TOTAL  CLAY 

SUBSTAN 

CE 

/ 

^Ns 

/ 

B 

CLAY    MINER 

kLS    PLUS 

LIMONITE 

O 

z 

UJ 
O 

UJ 

a. 

/ 

/ 

' 

/ 

^ 

c 

QUARTZ 

.005  002  .001 

LOG    DIAMETER    IN   MM. 


Fig.  6^ — Frequency  Distribution  Curves  for  Sample  6. 


CLAY  SUBSTANCE  OF  MOLDING  SANDS 


17 


A 

^-\ 

TOTAL  CLAY 

SUBSTANC  E 

/ 

\ 

/ 

V 

" 

/ 

B 

CLAY    MINER/ 

.LS   PLUS 

LIMONITE 

^.^ 



^ 

c 

^ 

QUARTZ 

/ 

V 

/ 

V 

02 


.005  002  .001 

LOG    DIAMETER    IN   MM  . 


Fig.  7 — Frequency  Distribution  Curves  fo^  Sample  7. 


A 

TOTAL   CLAY 

SUBSTANC 

E 

r\. 

^ 

\ 

1 

B 

CLAY    MINER 

^LS    PLUS 

LIMONITE 

f 

1 

W 

QUARTZ 

\ 

1 

\^ 

""^^.^ 

.005  .002  .001 

LOG    DIAMETER    IN    MM 


Fig.  8 — Frequency  Distribution  Curves  for  Sample  8. 


18 


MINERAL  COMPOSITION  AND  TEXTURE 


The  frequency  curves  for  the  quartz  and 
clay  minerals  plus  limonite  represent  the 
size-grade  distribution  of  these  constituents 
in  the  same  manner  that  the  curve  for  the 
entire  clay  substance  represents  the  size- 
grade  distribution  of  the  entire  clay  sub- 
stance. For  example,  in  the  curve  for  the 
clay  minerals  plus  limonite  (fig.  IB),  the 
area  under  the  curve  and  between  vertical 
lines  drawn  at  0.02  and  0.01  mm.  is  13  per 
cent  of  the  total  area  under  this  curve,  and 
therefore  13  per  cent  of  the  total  clay  min- 
erals plus  limonite  occurs  in  the  size  grade 
0.02  to  0.01  mm.  The  curves  are  so  con- 
structed that  the  area  under  curve  B  be- 
tween any  grade  size,  plus  the  area  under 
curve  C  between  the  same  grade  size  is  equal 
to  the  area  beneath  curve  A  between  these 
grade  sizes.  Thus,  in  figure  1  the  area  under 
curve  B  between  0.02  and  0.01  mm.  is  two 
thirds  of  the  area  under  curve  A  between 
0.02  and  0.01  mm.,  and  therefore  two  thirds 
of  the  clay  substance  occurring  between 
0.02  and  0.01  mm.  is  clay  mineral  plus 
limonite.  It  is  possible,  therefore,  from  the 
above  curves  to  determine  the  relative 
amount  of  the  mineral  components  in  the 
total  clay  substance  and  in  any  size  grade. 

ANALYTICAL  RESULTS 

The  clay  substance  of  sample  1  shows  a 
concentration  of  material  in  the  0.02  to  0.01 
mm.  and  the  — 0.0005  mm.  grade  sizes. 
Only  a  small  proportion  of  the  clay  sub- 
stance is  quartz,  and  it  is  concentrated 
slightly  in  the  coarser  fractions.  The  clay 
mineral  and  limonite  fraction  shows  two 
points  of  concentration ;  in  the  coarsest  frac- 
tion (0.02  to  0.01  mm.)  and  the  finest 
fraction    (-0.0005  mm.). 

In  sample  2  there  is  a  pronounced  con- 
centration of  the  total  clay  substance  in  the 
0.02  to  0.005  mm.  grade  size.  Only  about 
10  per  cent  of  the  total  clay  substance  occurs 
in  particles  smaller  than  0.002  mm.  which 
is  frequently  considered  the  upper  size  limit 
of  true  clay.  Quartz  is  almost  as  abundant 
as  the  clay  minerals  plus  limonite,  and  all 
constituents  show  a  great  concentration  in 
the  sizes  coarser  than  0.005  mm. 

The  clay  substance  of  sample  3,  like 
sample  2,  is  chiefly  composed  of  particles 
coarser  than  0.005  mm.    Only  about  15  per 


cent  of  the  clay  substance  is  found  in  parti- 
cles finer  than  0.002  mm.  Quartz  is  con- 
siderably less  abundant  than  the  clay  min- 
erals plus  limonite,  and  all  constituents  are 
concentrated  in  the  sizes  coarser  than  0.005 
mm. 

The  clay  substance  of  sample  4  is  com- 
posed chiefly  of  particles  coarser  than  about 
0.002  mm.  There  is  a  minor  concentration 
in  the  —0.0005  mm.  grade  size.  Most  of 
the  clay  substance  is  composed  of  clay  min- 
erals plus  limonite  concentrated  slightly  in 
the  coarsest  and  finest  sizes.  A  considerable 
amount  of  quartz  is  present,  and  it  is  con- 
centrated in  the  coarsest  sizes. 

In  sample  5,  a  large  part  of  the  clay  sub- 
stance is  concentrated  in  particles  larger 
than  0.005  mm.  Clay  mineral  plus  limonite 
is  more  abundant  than  quartz  and  is  evenly 
distributed  except  for  a  slight  concentration 
of  the  finer  sizes.  The  quartz  is  concen- 
trated in  the  coarsest  grades. 

A  large  part  of  the  clay  substance  of 
sample  6  is  found  in  particles  smaller  than 
0.001  mm.  There  is  a  small  concentration 
in  the  0.02  to  0.01  mm.  grade  size,  which 
reflects  the  concentration  of  the  minor 
amount  of  quartz  in  this  size.  The  sample 
is  distinctive  because  of  the  small  amount 
of  limonite  plus  clay  mineral  in  particles 
coarser  than  0.001  mm.,  and  the  great  con- 
centration of  this  material  in  particles  finer 
than  this  size. 

The  clay  substance  of  sample  7  shows 
pronounced  concentrations  in  the  0.02  to 
0.005  mm.  and  the  finest  grades.  Quartz 
is  slightly  less  abundant  than  clay  mineral 
plus  limonite,  and  it  is  highly  concentrated 
in  particles  coarser  than  0.005  mm.  There 
is  little  clay  mineral  plus  limonite  in  the 
coarser  sizes,  this  material  being  concen- 
trated in  the  sizes  finer  than  about  0.002 
mm. 

The  clay  substance  of  sample  8  shows  a 
high  concentration  in  the  coarsest  size  with 
decreasing  amounts  in  successively  finer 
sizes.  About  half  of  the  clay  substance  is 
quartz  in  particles  concentrated  in  the  coars- 
est grade  sizes.  The  limonite  plus  clay  min- 
eral is  evenly  distributed  throughout  the 
entire  clay  substance  except  for  a  slight 
concentration  in  sizes  between  about  0,005 
to  0.0005  mm. 


CLAY  SUBSTANCE  OF  MOLDING  SANDS 


19 


DISCUSSION  OF  RESULTS 

The  analytical  data  show  that  in  all 
samples  very  little  quartz  occurs  in  particles 
smaller  than  0.002  mm,  and  that  most  of  it 
is  present  in  grains  coarser  than  0.005  mm. 
Particles  of  quartz  are  angular  in  shape,  and 
they  do  not  add  to  the  bond  strength  of  a 
sand.  If  the  clay  substance  were  defined 
with  an  upper  limit  of  0.002  mm.,  quartz 
grains  would  be  largely  eliminated  and  the 
clay  substance  would  be  more  nearly  com- 
posed of  clay  minerals  and  limonite,  which 
are  the  materials  determining  bonding 
strength. 

The  clay  mineral  plus  limonite  component 
of  the  clay  substance  usually  is  found  in 
particles  smaller  than  0.002  mm.  However, 
in  some  samples  much  of  the  clay  mineral 
and  limonite  is  present  in  particles  larger 
than  0.002  mm.  These  larger  particles  are 
aggregates  of  smaller  clay  mineral  flakes 
bound  rather  loosely  together  by  limonite. 
In  general  these  materials  add  little  to  the 
strength  of  a  sand  when  they  are  present  in 
aggregates.  When  a  sand  is  mulled  or  re- 
vivified there  is  a  tendency  to  break  up  the 
aggregates  thereby  releasing  the  component 
particles  which  then  add  to  the  strength  of 
the  sand.  Thus,  a  sand  containing  aggre- 
gates may  maintain  its  strength  or  even 
increase  it  for  the  first  several  heats.  As 
the  sand  is  used,  aggregates  are  broken  up 
and  bond  is  developed  which  may  more  than 
compensate  for  the  bond  burned  out  during 
the  first  several  heats. 

It  has  long  been  known  that  all  sands 
with  the  same  amount  of  clay  substance  do 
not  have  the  same  strength.  The  absence  of 
a  close  correlation  between  amount  of  clav 


substance  and  green  compression  strength  is 
shown  by  the  data  in  table  1.  Thus  samples 
1  and  3  have  about  the  same  amount  of  clay 
substance  whereas  the  green  compression 
strength  of  sample  1  is  18  lb.  per  sq.  in.  as 
compared  with  13.5  lb.  per  sq.  in.  for  sample 
3.  Sample  6  has  only  one  third  as  much  clay 
substance  as  sample  3,  but  has  a  green  com- 
pression strength  about  equal  to  that  of  sam- 
ple 3. 

The  variations  in  size-grade  distribution 
and  in  relative  amounts  of  quartz  and  clay 
minerals  plus  limonite  within  the  clay  sub- 
stance explain  to  a  considerable  extent  the 
absence  of  a  close  correlation  between  physi- 
cal properties  and  amount  of  clay  substance. 
For  example,  the  clay  substance  of  sample 
1  contains  only  a  small  amount  of  a  con- 
stituent (quartz)  which  does  not  add  to  its 
bonding  power.  Also  in  sample  1  a  large 
amount  of  the  clay  mineral  plus  limonite 
is  in  the  finest  size  grade  ( — 0.0005  mm.) 
and  it  is  well  recognized  that  the  finer  the 
size  of  the  particles  of  a  given  type  of  clay 
mineral  the  greater  its  bonding  power.  In 
comparison  the  clay  substance  of  sample  3 
contains  a  large  proportion  of  quartz  and 
a  comparitively  small  amount  of  the  clay 
mineral  plus  limonite  in  a  fine  size.  It  fol- 
lows, therefore,  that  the  bonding  power  of 
the  clay  substance  of  sample  3  would  be 
less  than  that  of  sample  1.  This  correlation 
between  the  strength  of  the  sand  and  the 
constitution  of  the  clay  substance  is  further 
substantiated  by  the  fineness  test  results  in 


tabl( 


The  fineness  test  shows  that  sand 


No.  1  is  coarser  grained  than  sand  No.  3. 
Because  of  the  composition  of  its  clay  sub- 
stance, the  coarser  sand  (Sample  1)  has  the 
higher  green  compression  strength. 


Table  2. — Clay  Substance  and  Fineness  Tests  of  the  Molding  Sands 


Per  cent 


Sieve  Sample  Sample  Sample  Sample  Sample  Sample  Sample  Sample 

Size  12  3  4  5  6  7  8 

40 0.8  0.8  0.4  2.0  0.0  0.4  2.8  0.2 

70 3.4  2.8  0.6  22.2  0.8  7.8  20.2  0.4 

100 510  8.4  21.6  37.0  21.6  55.8  41.0  2.4 

140 12.0  4.0  34.6  3.6  9.2  12.6  2.4  1.2 

200 6.0  19.4  19.4  2.6  12.0  8.0  1.6  2.6 

270 1.6  27.0  1.0  1.2  13.0  3.0  0.8  4.0 

—270 5.2  26.8  3.2  10.2  26.6  5.8  5.2  42.2 

Clay 20  0  10.8  19.2  21.2  16.8  6.6  26  0  46.6 

Total 100  0  100  0  100.0  100.0  100  0  100  0  100  0  99.6 

A  F  A 

Fineness  No 96  194  125  95  158  95  79  266 


20 


MINERAL  COMPOSITION  AND  TEXTURE 


Sample  6  shows  a  very  large  proportion 
of  its  clay  substance  in  the  finest  grade  size 
and  comparatively  little  quartz  whereas  the 
clay  substance  of  sample  3  has  a  large 
amount  of  quartz  and  a  small  amount  of 
material  in  the  — 0.0005  mm.  grade  size. 
This  explains  why  sample  6  has  a  green 
compression  strength  about  equal  to  that  of 
sample  3  which  has  several  times  as  much 
total  clay  substance.  Again,  the  correlation 
is  supported  by  the  fineness  test  results  in 
table  2  which  show  that  sample  3  is  a  finer 
grained  sand  than  sample  6.  On  the  basis 
of  fineness  tests  alone,  sample  3  should  have 
a  much  higher  green  compression  strength 
than  sample  6.  The  fact  that  it  does  not 
have  much  higher  strength  emphasizes  the 
important  effect  of  the  composition  of  the 
clay  substance  on  bonding  properties. 

Sample  2  has  a  small  amount  of  clay  sub- 
stance, and  the  clay  substance  has  a  large 
amount  of  quartz  and  a  small  amount  of 
clay  mineral  and  limonite  in  the  finest  sizes. 
The  low  green  compression  strength  of  this 
sand  is,  therefore,  explained.  The  impor- 
tance of  the  composition  of  the  clay  sub- 
stance is  again  emphasized  by  the  fineness 
tests  of  sample  2  (table  2).  Sand  No.  2  is 
a  fine-grained  molding  sand  and  on  this  basis 
alone  a  greater  green  compression  strength 
would  be  expected.  The  size  of  the  clay 
particles  and  the  large  amount  of  quartz 
in  the  clay  substance,  however,  cause  the 
strength  to  be  low.  A  further  check  of  tables 
1  and  2  and  figures  1  to  8  shows  that  all  the 
molding  sands  investigated  exhibit  the  same 
general  correlation  between  their  green  com- 
pression strength  and  composition  of  clay 
substance  as  the  ones  selected  and  quoted 
herein. 

Table  3. — Composition  of  the  Clay  Mineral  Plus 
Limonite  Portion  of  the  Clay  Substance 

Sample  Composition 

1.  Kaolinite  VA;  illite  A;  limonite  A. 

2.  Kaolinite  A;  illite  A;  limonite  A. 

3.  Kaolinite  VA;  illite  (?);  limonite  A. 

4.  Kaolinite  VA;  illite  A;  limonite  VA. 

5.  Kaolinite  A;  illite  A;  limonite  VA, 

6.  Illite  VA;  kaolinite  (?);  montmorillonite  (?); 
limonite  C. 

7.  Kaolinite  A;  illite  A;  montmorillonite  (?); 
limonite  A. 

8.  Illite  VA;  kaolinite  A;  limonite  C. 
VA=40  per  cent  +;       A=40-20  per  cent; 

C^20  per  cent  — . 


Variations  in  the  relative  abundance  of 
quartz  and  clay  minerals  plus  limonite  and 
in  the  size-grade  distribution  within  the 
clay  substance  are  not  the  only  factors  tend- 
ing to  prevent  a  close  correlation  between 
amount  of  clay  substance  and  physical  prop- 
erties. Another  factor  is  the  variation  in  the 
type  of  clay  mineral  present.  In  a  previous 
paper, ^  it  has  been  shown  that  the  bonding 
power  of  a  clay  will  vary  depending  on 
whether  illite,  kaolinite,  or  montmorillonite 
is  the  constituent  of  the  clay.  The  identity 
of  the  clay  minerals,  their  relative  abun- 
dance, and  the  relative  abundance  of  the 
limonite  are  given  in  table  3.  It  is  evident 
from  this  table  that  the  clay  mineral  in  all 
the  samples  is  essentially  a  mixture  of  kao- 
linite and  illite.  Samples  6  and  7  also  appear 
to  contain  montmorillonite.  The  relative 
amounts  of  these  clay  minerals  and  the  char- 
acter of  the  illite  would  have  to  be  deter- 
mined in  considerable  detail  before  a  close 
correlation  with  ph5^sical  properties  could  be 
made. 

SUMMARY 

It  has  been  shown  that  there  is  consider- 
able variation  in  the  size-grade  distribution 
within  the  clay  substance  of  molding  sands, 
in  the  relative  amounts  of  quartz,  clay  min- 
erals, and  limonite  which  compose  the  clay 
substance  of  different  sands,  and  in  the  size- 
grade  distribution  of  these  mineral  constitu- 
ents in  the  clay  substance  of  various  sands. 
These  variations  explain  to  a  considerable 
degree  the  absence  of  a  close  correlation 
between  amount  of  clay  substance  and  physi- 
cal properties  of  natural  molding  sands. 

The  quartz  grains  are  concentrated  in  the 
coarser  fractions  of  the  clay  substance,  and 
only  a  very  small  amount  of  quartz  is  found 
in  particles  smaller  than  0.002  mm.  The 
clay  minerals  and  limonite  occur  in  all  sizes 
within  the  clay  grade,  and  are  frequently 
concentrated  in  the  coarsest  (0.02  to  0.01 
mm.)  and  finest  (—0.0005  mm.)  fractions. 
These  materials  in  the  coarsest  fraction  are 
present  as  aggregates  which  are  broken 
down  on  using  so  that  strength  is  developed 
in  the  sand  during  the  first  few  times  the 
sand  is  used. 


''Grim.  R.  E.,  Elements  of  the  petrographic  study  of 
bonding  clays  and  of  the  clay  substance  of  molding  sands: 
Trans.  Am.  Foundrymen's  Assoc,  vol.  47,  No.  4,  pp. 
89.S-908^   1940;  see  this  Rept.   Inv.,  pp.  5-11. 


CLAY  SUBSTANCE  OF  MOLDING  SANDS 


21 


The  clay  minerals  in  the  sands  investi- 
gated are  kaolinite  and  illite.  Two  of  the 
sands  also  appear  to  contain  small  amounts 
of  montmorillonite. 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

The  x-ray  analyses  were  made  by  W.  F. 
Bradley  of  the  Illinois  State  Geological 
Survey.  R.  A.  Rowland,  also  of  the  Illinois 
Geological  Survey,  assisted  in  making  the 
determinations  of  size-grade  distribution  and 
green  compression  strength.  It  is  desired 
also  to  acknowledge  the  counsel  of  W.  F. 
Krumbein  of  the  University  of  Chicago  in 
preparing  the  graphs  portraying  some  of  the 
analytical  data. 


DISCUSSION 


Presiding'.  H.  S.  Washburn,  Plainville  Casting 
Co.,  Plainville,  Conn. 

H.  L.  Daasch^  {Written  discussion):  The  conten- 
tions of  the  authors  might  be  stated:  (1)  quartz 
particles  should  not  be  considered  effective  in  bond 
strengths  and  (2)  equally  coarse  aggregates  of  true 
clay  minerals  are  ineffective  in  bond  strength. 
These  lead  to  (3)  sub-micron  clay  minerals  plus 
limonite  are  "chiefly  responsible  for  strength  prop- 
erties of  the  sand."  A  number  of  comparisons  will 
be  made  on  these  premises. 

Samples  1  and  3  are  noted  in  paragraph  25  of  the 
paper.  Table  3  shows  quite  similar  clay  mineral 
composition.  If  less  than  one  micron  size  clay 
mineral  content  is  considered  for  each,  we  find  a 
ratio  of  approximately  4:1;  a  ratio  much  different 
than  the  strength  ratio  of  18:13.5. 

Samples  6  and  3  are  also  compared  in  paragraphs 
25  and  27  (pp.  19,  20).  Note  however,  that  if 
clay  which  is  smaller  than  one  micron  is  consid- 
ered, a  ratio  of  such  clay  contents  is  practically 
2:1.    Yet  strength  ratio  is  12.5:13.5. 

Again,  compare  samples  2  and  5.  The  below  one 
micron  size  clay  content  is  approximately  in  the 
ratio  of  1:5  while  the  strength  ratio  is  7.5:11.0. 
Table  3  shows  very  similar  clay  composition. 

The  writer  does  not  feel  that  conclusions  should 
be  too  quickly  drawn  on  the  data  now  available  on 
clay.  For  example,  kaolinite  should,  according  to 
Grim^,  occur  in  particle  sizes  larger  than  1  micron. 
Grim  indicates  further  that  illite  is  most  likely  to 
occur  in  similarly  1  micron  and  larger  particles. 
Let  us  now  consider  samples  1,  2, 3  and  5  which  have 
been  compared  in  previous  paragraphs.  If  kaolonite 
is  eliminated  and  illite  similarly  but  reasonably  not 
considered  because  of  the  likelihood  of  greater  than 
1  micron  size;  we  have  left  primarily  limonite  in 
sub-micron  size.  In  three  of  the  four  cases  the  per- 
centage of  this  limonite  is  20-40  per  cent.  According 
to  the  premises  of  the  authors,  we  would  conclude 
that  such  limonite  would  have  to  account  for 
strength  property  characteristics. 

1  Associate  Professor,  Dept.  of  Mechanical  Engineering, 
Iowa  State  College,  Ames,  Iowa. 


Again,  let  us  consider  statements  of  Casberg  and 
Schubert^  and  Grim-  which  indicate  that  base  ex- 
change capacity  is  a  criteria  of  strength  properties. 
Consider  further  the  statements  of  Grim^  that 
kaolinite  has  relatively  low  ionic  exchange  and  that 
illite  may  often  be  similarly  low.  This  would  bring 
us  to  the  peculiar  conclusion  that  base  exchange 
variations  for  the  samples  1,  2,  3  and  5  would  be  ac- 
counted for  by  (1)  low  exchange  capacity  material  or 
(2)  by  limonite. 

The  writer  does  not,  of  course,  concur  in  these  con- 
clusions. They  are  based  on  generalized  statements 
propounded  by  the  authors  in  the  present  paper  and 
in  the  references  quoted. 

The  point  the  writer  would  make  is  that  a  "gen- 
eral correlation  between  green  compression  strength 
and  composition  of  clay  substance"  is  not  necessar- 
ily shown  by  the  data  submitted.  When  viewed  in 
the  light  of  preceding  paragraphs  we  do  not  "ex- 
plain to  a  considerable  degree  the  absence  of  a  close 
correlation  between  amount  of  clay  substance  and 
physical  properties." 

The  writer  has  produced  a  wide  variety  of  molding 
sand  strength  properties  by  adjustment  or  change  in 
sand  component  without  any  change  in  type  or 
amount  of  bond  material.  Variations  in  molding 
sand  strength  properties  need  not  involve  ipso  facto 
any  differences  in  the  clay. 

Finally,  the  writer  would  like  to  ask  the  authors 
if  any  control  is  offered  in  the  use  of  the  pipette  size 
analysis  and  the  A.F.A.  strength  tests  which  would 
permit  a  correlation  study  as  made  in  the  paper. 
This  query  is  prompted  by  a  recent  report  by 
Grim*.  After  discussing  the  effect  of  water  in  fine- 
ness and  use  tests,  Doctor  Grim  writes:  "In  such 
correlation  work,  the  objective  should  to  deter- 
mine the  effective  particle  size  i.e.,  the  particle  size 
of  the  clay  as  it  is  usually  used."  So  far  as  the 
writer  can  determine,  the  authors  have  neglected 
this  previous  admonition  in  the  present  correlation 
study. 

A.  Samuel  Berlin^  {Written  discussion):  This 
paper,  like  others  by  the  same  authors,  is  extremely 
interesting.  It  constitutes  a  valuable  contribution 
on  the  influence  of  clay  particle  size  on  green  strength 
of  molding  sands.  Since  the  increase  in  the  green 
strength  depends,  to  a  certain  extent,  upon  the 
breaking  down  of  the  large  size  particles  into  smaller 
ones  as  for  example,  the  mineral  kaolinite,  1  think 
it  would  be  advantageous  to  find  a  rapid  method  to 
determine  the  chemical  and  mineral  content  of  the 
clays  so  that  we  would  be  able  to  control  the  green 
strength  of  the  molding  sands  in  those  cases  where 
these  factors  are  important. 

Having  an  economical  and  positive  method  of 
controlling  the  particle  size  of  the  clay  so  that  it 
would  approach  the  ( — 0.0005  mm.)  fraction,  I  think 
would  be  the  solution  of  quite  a  few  of  our  molding 
difficulties  that  are  attributed  to  green  strength 
failure. 


'R.  E.  Grim,  Elements  of  the  petrographic  study  of 
bonding  clays  and  of  the  clay  substance  foundry  sands: 
Trans.  Am.  Foundrymen's  Assoc,  vol.  47,  1940;  see  this 
Rept.   Inv.,   pp.   5-11. 

•■'Casberg,  C.  H.,  and  Schubert,  C.  E.,  An  investigation 
of  the  durability  of  molding  sands:  Illinois  Eng.  Exp.  Sta., 
Bui.,   281,   April,    1936. 

^Grim,  R.  E.,  Relation  of  the'compositionjtorthe  proper- 
ties of  clays:  Jour.  Am.  Cer.  Soc.  22,  pp.  141-151,  1939. 

■''American  Manganese  Steel  Division,  New  Castle,  Del. 


22 


MINERAL  COMPOSITION  AND  TEXTURE 


R.  E.  Grim  and  C.  E.  Schubert  {Reply  to  written 
discussions):  Mr.  Daasch  has  arrived  at  conclusions 
from  our  data  that  are  obviously  in  error  because  he 
has  failed  to  understand  our  statements  or  has  read 
into  them  meanings  which  they  do  not  contain. 

We  state  that  "particles  of  quartz  ...  do  not 
add  to  the  bond  strength  of  a  sand."  The  point  is 
made  that  the  bonding  power  of  the  clay  substance 
rests  in  the  clay  mineral  and  limonite  component 
and  not  in  the  quartz  component.  We  realize,  and 
in  fact  point  out,  that  the  total  bond  strength  of  a 
natural  bonded  sand  is  partly  dependent  on  the 
size  of  quartz  grains  which  the  clay  mineral  and 
limonite  must  bond.  This,  in  no  way,  argues  against 
the  idea  that  the  seat  of  the  bonding  power  is  in  the 
clay  mineral  and  limonite  and  not  in  the  quartz. 

Daasch  has  somehow  read  into  our  statements  the 
idea  that  only  the  portion  of  the  clay  mineral  and 
limonite  occurring  in  particles  less  than  0.001  mm. 
in  diameter  has  bond  strength.  He  then  proceeds  to 
show  that  the  ratio  of  the  — 0.001  mm.  clay  mineral 
and  limonite  fractions  of  various  sands  is  not  the 
same  as  the  ratio  of  the  bond  strength  of  the  same 
sands.  W'e  state  clearly  (in  par.  23  for  example, 
p.  19)  that  bond  strength  rests  in  the  clay  mineral 
and  limonite  component.  Nothing  is  said  anywhere 
that  only  — 0.001  mm.  clay  mineral  and  limonite  has 
bond  strength.  What  is  stated  is  that  the  bonding 
power  of  this  (Component  of  the  clay  substance  tends 
to  increase  as  the  particle  size  decreases.  The  ratio 
between  the  — 0.001  mm.  clay  mineral  and  limonite 
for  different  sands  should,  of  course,  not  be  the 
same  as  the  ratio  of  the  bond  strength  of  the  same 
sands  because  this  — 0.001  mm.  material  does  not 
alone  determine  strength  of  the  sands  even  when 
the  clay  minerals  are  the  same.  As  pointed  out  all 
the  clay  mineral  plus  limonite  component  has 
strength,  the  fineness  of  the  quartz  must  be  con- 
sidered, and  the  character  of  the  exchangeable  base 
also  exerts  an  influence.  What  we  believe  our  data 
show  convincingly  is  that  the  relative  total  amount 
of  clay  mineral  and  limonite  in  the  clay  substance 
of  a  molding  sand  is  important  in  determining  its 
strength,  and  also  that  the  initial  strength  of  two 
molding  sands,  equivalent  in  every  way  except  in 
the  size  distribution  of  the  clay  mineral  and  limonite 
particles  and  aggregates  will  be  different — the  one 
containing  these  components  in  the  finer  size  having 
the  higher  strength. 

Grim  states  that  kaolinite  occurs  in  particles 
rarely  smaller  than  — 0.001  mm.  and  that  most 
illite  occurs  in  particles  about  this  same  size.  Grim 
also  states  that  some  illite  occurs  in  finer  particles. 
Daach  concludes,  as  the  clay  minerals  in  the  samples 
are  chiefly  kaolinite  and  illite,  that  there  are  no  clay 
minerals  in  the  — 0.001  mm.  size  grades  and  that  it 
is  all  limonite.  As  Daasch  has  thought  that  only — 
0.001  mm.  material  has  bonding  power,  he  concludes 
that  the  bonding  power  is  only  possessed  by  the  li- 
monite.    This  is,  of  course,  an  erroneous  conclusion. 

Some  of  the  kaolinite  and  i  llite  occur  in  the 
— 0.001  mm.  fractions  and  the  entire  clay  mineral 
plus  limonite  fraction  is  responsible  for  bonding 
power.  Grim  is  perhaps  responsible  for  Daasch's 
false  conclusion  here,  by  not  stating  that  kaolinite 
rarely  occurs  in  particles  smaller  than  about  0.001 
mm.  The  point  that  Grim  wished  to  emphasize 
was  that  kaolinite  and  most  illite  tend  to  occur  in 
particles  larger  than  about  QX)Q\  mm.,  and  that  they 
are  not  easily  broken  down  by  agitation  in  water 
into  particles  much  smaller  than  this  size.    This  is 


a  generality  encountered   by   all  students  of  clay 
mineralogy. 

Kaolinite  is  shown  to  have  a  low  base-exchange 
capacity,  and  illite  is  known  to  have  low  or  moderate 
base-exchange  capacity.  These  are  the  clay  mineral 
components  of  the  samples  studied.  We  have  not 
determined  the  base-exchange  characteristics  of 
our  samples,  and  consequently  do  not  know  whether 
such  determination  would  substantiate  or  deny  the 
findings  of  Casberg  and  Schubert.  Because  the 
clay  minerals  are  those  having  low  capacity  seems 
to  us  to  be  no  reason  to  conclude,  as  Daasch  has 
done,  before  any  determinations  are  made  that 
such  determinations  would  not  agree  with  Casberg 
and  Schubert. 

In  reply  to  Daasch's  question  about  particle  size 
analysis,  we  would  say  that  we  followed  the  Bureau 
of  Standards  procedure  to  which  reference  is  made. 
We  point  out  that  the  pipette  analyses  show  some 
clay  mineral  and  limonite  in  all  size  grades  and  that 
it  is  frequently  concentrated  in  the  coarse  (because 
of  aggregates)  and  in  the  finest  size  grades.  These 
fractionations  were  made  to  show  first  the  particle 
size  distributions  of  quartz  in  the  clay  substance. 
It  should  be  emphasized  that  Grim's  statements  of 
"effective  particle  size"  referred  to  clay  minerals 
only  and  not  to  quartz.  The  fractionations  were 
made  also  to  determine  the  particle  size  of  the  clay 
minerals  and  limonite  when  prepared  by  a  method 
suggested  for  molding  sands.  The  authors  made  no 
attempts  to  correlate  the  size  grade  determinations 
in  detail  with  the  bonding  properties.  This  cannot 
be  done  in  detail  because  of  the  "effective  particle 
size"  concept,  and,  as  pointed  out  before,  because 
other  factors  control  bond  strength.  The  justifica- 
tions for  the  statement  of  Daasch  that  some  general 
conclusions  cannot  be  recognized  because  details 
cannot  be  worked  out  is  not  clear  to  us.  In  our 
minds  the  discussion  of  the  break  down  of  the 
aggregates  with  the  liberation  of  bonding  power  as 
the  sand  is  used  is  an  illustration  of  the  importance 
of  "effective  particle  size"  rather  than  a  neglect  of  it. 

Finally  we  feel  that  the  data  presented  by  us  show 
that  the  abundance  and  size  grade  distribution  of 
the  quartz  and  clay  mineral  plus  limonite  "explain 
to  a  considerable  degree  the  absence  of  a  close  corre- 
lation between  amount  of  clay  substance  and 
physical  properties  of  natural  molding."  We  in- 
serted the  expression  "to  a  considerable  degree"  be- 
cause these  "are  not  the  only  factors  tending  to 
prevent  a  close  correlation"   (paragraph  29,  p.  20). 

In  reply  to  Mr.  Berlin  we  wish  to  say  that  at  the 
present  time  the  method  for  determining  the  mineral 
composition  of  the  clay  substance  of  molding  sands 
and  for  studying  the  size  grade  distribution  of  the 
clay  mineral  particles  is  long  and  somewhat  in- 
volved. The  method  embodies  a  combination  of 
size-grade  fractionation  and  petrographic  analysis. 
The  petrographic  analysis  identifies  the  minerals  by 
X-ray  and  optical  analytical  data.  Mr.  Berlin  is 
quite  correct,  it  would  be  very  advantageous  to  find 
a  shorter  method  for  this  work,  and  we  hope  that 
this  may  be  possible. 

Member:  Is  it  possible  to  separate  the  limonite 
from  the  clay  minerals? 

Dr.  Grim:  There  are  ways  of  getting  rid  of  the 
iron  oxide.  You  can  remove  it,  but  it  is  frequently 
impossible  to  remove  it  quantitatively  and  still  re- 
tain the  clay  minerals  with  their  original  character. 

H.  RiEs";  In  paragraph  6,  the  authors  state  that 
the  size-grade  distribution  of  the  grains   was  de- 


CLAY  SUBSTANCE  OF  MOLDING  SANDS 


23 


termined  with  a  pipette.  Have  the  authors  in  their 
laboratories  ever  used  the  hydrometer  method? 

Dr.  Grim:  Yes,  we  have  used  the  hydrometer 
method.  The  chief  reason  for  the  pipette  method 
here  was  to  obtain  fractions  for  microscopic  study. 
In  the  case  of  the  pipette,  you  draw  off  a  certain 
amount  that  represents  the  material  finer  than  a 
given  size  grade  and  then  you  have  something  to 
study  for  the  identification  of  the  constituents. 
We  have  no  objection  to  the  hydrometer  method. 
We  chose  to  use  the  pipette  method  simply  because 
it    gave    us    samples    for  mineralogical    analysis. 

Member:  Would  the  amount  of  limonite  present 
be  indicative  of  the  effective  life  of  the  clay? 

Mr.  Schubert:  According  to  the  hydration  and 
dehydration  curve,  I  might  answer  it  in  this  way. 
Limonite  breaks  up  at  a  very  low  temperature  and 
gives  up  its  water  of  crystallization  or  what  might  be 
called  water  crystallization.  Therefore,  a  lot  of 
limonite  in  any  natural  sand  or  any  bonding  sub- 
stance should  cut  down  the  life  of  the  sand.  Now, 
we  have  not  yet  determined  the  durability  or  life 


of  sands  of  the  natural  variety.  We  reported^  at  the 
1937  convention  on  what  we  call  synthetic  sands. 
Those  were  of  the  montmorillonite  and  kaolinite 
type  and  we  did  not  include  plain  limonite  and 
silicia  sand.  From  the  hydration  curves  alone,  we 
know  that  limonite,  being  a  hydrated  ferric  oxide, 
does  give  off  its  water  at  very  low  temperatures  and 
in  ordinary  casting  work,  you  would  expect  that 
sand,  if  it  had  an  appreciable  amount  of  it  in  there, 
to  burn  out  very  readily,  and  therefore  its  life 
would  be  cut  down  to  some  extent. 

Member:  In  these  two  comparative  cases,  1 
and  3,  could  the  author  give  us  an  indication  as  to 
the  difference  in  the  amount  of  limonite? 

Mr.  Schubert:  That  is  contained  in  Table  3. 
The  limonite  was  about  20  per  cent  in  both  samples. 


'•Cornell  University,  Ithaca,  N.  Y. 

^Schubert,  C.  E.,  A  correlation  of  the  physical  and  chemi- 
cal properties  of  clays  with  the  durability  of  molding 
sands:  Trans.  Am.  Foundrymen's  Assoc,  vol.  45,  pp.  661- 
688,  1937. 


24 


PHYSICAL  AND  MINERALOGICAL 


THE  RELATIONSHIP  BETWEEN  THE  PHYSICAL  AND 
MINERALOGICAL  CHARACTERISTICS  OF  BONDING  CLAYSf 

By  Ralph  E.  Grim  and  Richards  A.  Rowland 

ABSTRACT 

Data  are  presented  to  show  that  the  kind  and  amount  of  clay  mineral  in  a  clay  are 
the  most  important  factors  determining  its  bonding  strength.  The  relation  between 
these  factors  is  discussed.  The  problem  of  the  break  up  of  the  clay  mineral  in  clays, 
such  as  might  be  brought  about  by  muUing,  is  analyzed  in  relation  to  bonding  strength. 


INTRODUCTION 

The  object  of  the  investigation  reported 
herein  was  to  study  the  fundamental  factors 
controlling  the  variations  in  the  bonding 
properties  of  clays.  It  is  a  well  recognized 
fact  that  not  all  clays  possess  the  same 
bonding  characteristics,  but  the  factors  that 
determine  the  variations  have  not  been  well 
understood.  This  report  is  the  fourth^-  ■''  ^* 
of  a  series  reporting  the  results  of  the  Illi- 
nois State  Geological  Survey's  project  for 
the  investigation  of  the  fundamental  proper- 
ties of  bonding  clays  and  molding  sands. 

In  recent  3^ears,  it  has  been  shown  that 
most  clays  and  shales  are  made  up  of  ex- 
tremely small  particles,  frequently  less  than 
0.001  mm.  (1/25000  in.),  of  a  limited 
number  of  minerals  known  as  the  clay  min- 
erals. Stated  another  way,  clays  and  shales 
are  essentially  aggregates  of  extremely  mi- 
nute particles  of  one  or  more  of  the  clay 
minerals.  The  most  common  clay  minerals 
are  noted  in  table  1. 


fReprinted  from  Trans.  Am.  Foundrymen's  Assoc,  VoL 
48,  No.  1,  pp.  211-24,  1940. 

^Superior  numbers  refer  to  bibliography  at  end  of 
paper. 

Note:  This  paper  was  presented  at  the  Foundry  Sand 
Research  Session  during  the  44th  annual  A.F.A.  conven- 
tion held  in  Chicago,  May  8,  1940. 


In  addition  to  clay  minerals,  clays  and 
shales  also  may  contain  varying  amounts  of 
quartz,  organic  material,  limonite  (hydrat- 
ed  ferric  iron  oxide),  etc.  Of  the  non-clay 
mineral  constituents,  quartz,  in  the  form  of 
grains,  is  by  far  the  most  abundant  and 
most  common.  Clays  differ  from  each  other 
fundamentally  in  the  clay  minerals  that 
compose  them,  in  the  amount  of  admixed 
quartz  or  other  non-clay  mineral  constitu- 
ents, and  in  their  texture  (size  of  particles, 
etc.).^  It  is  the  purpose  of  this  report  to 
present  the  results  of  a  study  of  the  influence 
of  these  fundamental  differences  between 
clays  on  their  bonding  characteristics. 

PROCEDURE 

In  the  past  eight  years,  the  complete  min- 
eral composition  of  a  large  number  of  clays 
and  shales  has  been  determined  by  x-ray  and 
microscopic  methods  in  the  laboratory  of 
the  Illinois  State  Geological  Survey.  From 
these  clays  and  shales,  a  group  was  selected 
for  the  present  investigation  that  exhibited 
wide  variations  in  composition  and  texture. 
The  clays  selected  are  not  all  commercial 
bond  clays.    The  clays  used  were  chosen  so 


Table  1. — Chemical  Composition  and  Occurrence  of  Common  Clay  Minerals 
Name  Chemical  Composition*  Occurrence 

Montmorillonite..  .  (0H)4  AI4  Sig  O20  XH2O Bentonites,  gumbotils,  etc. 

IlHte (0H)4  Ky  (Al4-Fe4-Mg4-Mg6)  (Si  (g-y).  Aly)  O20.  .Shales,  gumbotil,  underclays,  etc. 

Kaolinite (0H)8  AI4  Si4  Oio Underclays,  fire  clays,  china  clays,  etc. 


*Certain  substitutions  are  possible  in  these  general  formulae.  For  details  see  Grim,  R.  E.,  Relation  of  the  composition  to 
the  properties  of  clay:  Jour.  Am.  Ceramic  Society,  vol.  22,  pp.  141-151,  1939;  reprinted  as  Illinois  Geological  Survey,  Cir- 
cular 45,  1939. 


CHARACTERISTICS  OF  BONDING  CLAYS 


25 


that  the  results  would  provide  a  broad  pic- 
ture of  the  effect  of  different  characteristics 
of  clays  on  their  bonding  properties. 

The  green  compression  strength  of  each 
sample,  at  several  different  moisture  con- 
tents, was  determined  using  8  per  cent  clay 
and  92  per  cent  sand  (except  for  the  benton- 
ite  sample  when  4  per  cent  clay  and  96  per 
cent  sand  were  used).  These  determinations 
were  carried  out  according  to  A.  F.  A.  stand- 
ard procedure  except  that  the  sand*  used 
had  a  fineness  number  of  56  instead  of  50. 

For  each  sample,  the  amount  of  material 
coarser  than  the  A.  F.  A.  clay  grade^  and 
the  size  grade  distribution  within  the  A.  F. 
A.  clay  grade  were  determined  by  the  pipette 
method  (modified  after  Jackson  and  Sae- 
ger^).  Any  method  for  the  determination 
of  the  size  grade  distribution  of  a  clay  or 
shale  requires  that  the  clay  or  shale  be  first 
broken  down  in  water  into  a  suspension. 
The  results  obtained  are  always  dependent 
to  some  degree  on  the  amount  the  clay  or 
shale  has  been  disaggregated  in  water  prior 
to  the  analysis.  In  other  words,  widely 
different  size  grade  distribution  determina- 
tions may  be  obtained  from  a  single  clay  by 
the  use  of  different  amounts  and  kinds  of 
disaggregation. 

In  the  present  research,  great  care  was 
used  to  carry  out  the  disaggregation  of  all 
samples  in  exactly  the  same  manner  so  that 
the  results  would  be  comparable.  The  dis- 
aggregation procedure  followed  was  mild, 
/.  e.,  no  attempt  was  made  to  break  the  clays 
or  shales  down  to  anything  like  their  ulti- 
mate particle  size.  The  mild  procedure  was 
followed  because  in  the  actual  use  of  clays 
or  shales  for  rebonding,  they  are  in  general 
not  immediately  broken  down  to  their  ulti- 
mate particle  size.  It  was  felt  that  the  fol- 
lowing procedure  disaggregated  the  clay  to 
about  the  same  degree  as  in  the  actual  use 
of  the  clay  for  rebonding  and,  therefore, 
that  the  results  would  be  particularly  sig- 
nificant in  an  understanding  of  the  varia- 
tions of  the  bonding  properties  of  clays  or 
shales. 

The  clay  or  shale  was  first  ground  to  pass 
a  70-mesh  screen  and  then  soaked  in  water 
for  7  days.  During  the  soaking  period,  the 
clay  and  water  were  agitated  about  once 
every  12  hours.  Ammonium  hydroxide 
(NH_jOH)  was  used  as  the  dispersing 
agent. 


*The   sand   used   comes  from   the   Ottawa,    111.,   district 
and  is  regularly  sold  as  "bond"  sand. 


ANALYTICAL  DATA 

The  determinations  of  maximum  green 
compression  strength,  moisture  content  at 
maximum  strength,  quantity  of  clay  min- 
erals, clay  mineral  composition,  and  quantity 
of  material  in  the  A.  F.  A.  clay  grade  are 
given  in  table  2.  The  per  cent  of  clay  min- 
eral in  the  entire  sample  was  determined  by 
means  of  microscopic  examination.  In  some 
clays  and  shales,  the  clay  minerals  occur  in 
individual  particles  and  aggregate  masses 
that  are  larger  than  the  upper  size  limit  of 
the  A.  F.  A.  clay  grade,  i.e.,  0.020  mm. 

The  quantity  of  A.  F.  A.  clay  given  in 
table  2  is  that  portion  of  the  sample  shown 
by  the  pipette  analyses  to  be  less  than  0.020 
mm.  in  diameter.  The  disaggregation  pro- 
cedure preliminary  to  the  pipette  analyses 
was  a  very  mild  one  which  did  not  reduce 
all  the  clay  mineral  aggregates  or  large  indi- 
vidual particles  in  all  samples  to  a  size 
smaller  than  0.020  mm.  As  a  consequence, 
the  table  shows  the  total  amount  of  clay 
mineral  to  be  more  than  the  A.  F.  A.  clay 
for  some  samples. 

The  determinations  of  the  size  grade  dis- 
tribution of  each  sample  within  the  A.  F.  A. 
clay  grade  are  given  in  figure  1.  The  dis- 
tribution curves  in  figure  1  were  constructed 
by  the  graphic  differentiation  method^  from 
cumulative  curves  plotted  from  the  results 
of  the  pipette  analyses.  The  distribution 
curves  show  the  amount  of  material  between 
any  given  size  limits  by  the  proportion  of 
the  area  under  the  curve  between  the  given 
size  limits  to  the  area  beneath  the  entire 
curve. 

For  example  in  curve  No.  2,  the  area 
(EFSC)  beneath  the  curve  and  between 
vertical  lines  constructed  at  the  0.020  mm. 
and  0.010  mm.  points  is  11.2  per  cent  of  the 
area  beneath  curve  (EJNCJ,  plus  the  rec- 
tangular areas  (ABCD  and  KLMN )  and 
therefore  11.2  per  cent  of  the  sample  is  in 
the  0.020  mm.  to  0.010  mm.  grade  size. 
The  area  of  the  rectangle  (KLMN J,  on 
the  right,  in  proportion  to  the  area  under 
the  curve  (EJNC)  plus  the  area  of  the 
rectangles  (ABCD  and  KLMN)  represents 
that  portion  of  the  sample  smaller  than 
0.005  mm.  in  size  (12.7  per  cent  for  sample 
No.  2).  The  rectangle  (ABCD),  on  the 
left  for  sample  No.  2,  has  an  area  equal 
to  33.9  per  cent  of  the  area  under  the  curve 
(EJNC)     plus     the     areas     of     rectangles 


26 


PHYSICAL  AND  MINERALOGICAL 


OJ  o* 

.S  oo 

*— (  '— I  On 

^  I       I 


o  o 
S  £ 


SS     S 


4^  (U     <Li 


(U     <U 


I        I 


^    = 


o  o       c;       ^       jt:       it: 


^1 


^.Sc>^ 


O 


0Hl>g  CO 


£  £ 

3    O 

£U 


O 


c 

.2  wj  ^ 


c/2 


i~     (U 


C^Ul 


00  CX3 


rD         ^ 

O         ^ 


03  iH  a; 

.    '*>  4; 

as 

.>  °  8 

-^  C  o 
O.  ^-.— 


^— '   >^  c   ;j  ■;-; 

U      ^      <!-'  Ch   .2 


00       00       00       00      00  oo       00       00      00 


o 


(U    O 

PQW 


So 

OS    >, 


Oh 


c  6 


<u 


O-^ 


_  '^  — 

h-^  _C  M 


rt  LJ    rt    :>,   03  w  r  1    rt  .  ^    rt  "Tl 
t3    rt " 


?.0  CO  c  ^^  cc/:  CH 

Oh 


,  c/)    o 

cU 

.5  c 

>  I 

. — I      TO 


8.S 


-^  ox) 

— '  ^  I' 
^  c.S 

o  o6 

C   <L1  c 

os5 

3_   C 
O   rt« 

ill 

cc  S  3 

§■  i 

O-C   03 


CHARACTERISTICS  OF  BONDING  CLAYS 


27 


1 

'///// 

A 

B 

2 

'///// 

'W/. 

^rTTT77 

_G 

H 

K 

—1- 

D 

/////. 

s 

R 

P 

0 

J 
N 

M 

3 

'/////. 

W/, 

-.^ 

4 

////// 

////// 

X    X 

20 


10 


5  2 

MICRONS 


05 


Q^CLAY    MINERAL     fTZI  QUARTZ 

Fig.  1 — Size  Grade  Distribution  Curves.  1  Micron  is  Equal  to  0.001  mm.    For  the  Significance  of  the  "XX' 

See  Text  Below. 


(ABCD  and  KLMN )  and,  therefore,  indi- 
cates that  33.9  per  cent  of  the  sample  is 
composed  of  particles  larger  than  0.020 
mm.  in  size. 

In  the  curves  in  figure  1,  the  cross-hatched 
areas  represent  the  amount  of  calcite,  the 
diagonal  ruled  areas  represent  the  amount 
of  quartz,  and  the  remaining  area  represents 
the  amount  of  clay  mineral.  The  amount  of 
these  minerals   in   the   samples   as   a   whole 


or  in  the  individual  size  grades  can  be  ob- 
tained from  the  curves  by  comparing  areas. 
The  clay  mineral  material  occurring  in  the 
coarser  size  grades,  for  example  -]-0.005 
mm.,  may  be  either  aggregates  of  smaller 
particles  or  individual  particles  of  the  size 
indicated.  Where  the  size  grade  is  com- 
posed primarily  of  individual  particles  of 
clay  minerals  rather  than  aggregates,  the 
designation  "XX"  is  used. 


28 


PHYSICAL  AND  MINERALOGICAL 


^Tm. 

5 

///./// 

////// 

''//jU^ 

22222>^^ 

X  X 

^ 

6 

////// 

////// 

X  X 

>  /  ^  /  >  ^  ^  • 

^'^ 

^^^/ 

7 

^:>:% 

^/^ 

o^'^ 

y^7777 

^2222^^^ 

^ 

-^ 

XX 

N 

8 

^///// 

^-r-/' 

^::^^^^ 

y////zz 

V//// 

^^ 

//ji/jL 

9 

v////. 

,<-7^z22 

^2z>>>^ 

■^j^^-^^- 

^^^^^ 

20 


10 


5  2 

MICRONS 


05 


I         ICLAY     MINERAL     r//J  QUARTZ 
Fig.  1  Continued. 


SIGNIFICANCE  OF 
DISTRIBUTION  CURVES 

The  size  grade  distribution  curves  in 
figure  1  show  that  there  may  be  a  tremen- 
dous variation  in  the  size  distribution  of 
particles  for  different  clays.  Thus,  one  clay 
material  (No.  1)  has  most  of  its  particles 
smaller  than  0.005  mm.  whereas  another 
(No.  12)  has  very  few  particles  finer  than 


this  size.  Some  samples  (Nos.  1  and  11) 
have  very  few  particles  coarser  than  the 
A.  F.  A.  clay  grade,  i.e.,  0.020  mm.,  whereas 
other  samples  (Nos.  4  and  6)  have  many 
particles  coarser  than  this  size.  One  clay 
(No.  2)  has  a  very  even  distribution  of 
particles  between  0.020  mm.  and  0.0005 
mm.,  whereas  another  one  (No.  11)  has  an 
uneven  distribution  of  particles  between 
these    sizes. 


CHARACTERISTICS  OF  BONDING  CLAYS 


29 


10 

y////. 

r^-r^ 

'7>, 

X  X 

^ 

^^ 

2-^_^^_ 

^ 

A        t\ 

II 

y 

.^ 

^^^»>, 

<^ 

X  X 

^■^^-^223 

N^ 

////// 

^ 

12 

V//// 

^<^ 

///// 

'/  /  /A 

^7>->^ 

>- 

X    X 

V///. 

v///: 

^^ 

z 

a 

X 

X 

5  2 

MICRONS 

[^CLAY     MINERAL     [^^QUARTZ 
Fig.  1  Continued. 


CALCITE 


The  distribution  curves  in  figure  1  are 
arranged  in  the  order  of  decreasing  green 
compression  strength  of  the  clay  materials 
they  represent,  No.  1  having  the  greatest 
and  No,  14  the  least  strength.  A  critical 
analysis  of  the  size  distribution  data  of  these 
samples  in  relation  to  their  bonding  strength, 
brings  out  the  fact  that  there  is  no  precise 
correlation  between  any  single  size  distribu- 
tion characteristic,  or  combination  of  them, 
and  the  bonding  strength   of  the  clay  ma- 


terials. For  example,  there  is  no  correlation 
between  the  amount  of  A.  F.  A.  clay  grade 
as  determined  in  this  study  and  the  green 
compression  strength ;  also  there  is  no  cor- 
relation between  the  amount  of  material 
finer  than  0.0005  mm.,  and  the  green  com- 
pression strength.  This  means  that  some 
other  factors  are  dominant  in  controlling 
the  bonding  strength  of  clay  materials.  It 
will   be   shown   presently   that   the   amount 


30 


PHYSICAL  AND  MINERALOGICAL 


and  character  of  the  clay  mineral  content 
are  the  dominant  factors. 

One  might  conclude,  on  the  basis  of 
theoretical  considerations  and  microscopic 
study  of  clay-bonded  sands,  that  a  clay  com- 
posed chiefly  of  extremely  minute  particles 
(less  than  0.001  mm.),  or  of  larger  particles 
that  broke  down  immediately  to  such  minute 
particles  when  used,  would  have  the  high- 
est bonding  power,  other  factors  being  equal. 
This  conclusion  would  seem  to  follow,  be- 
cause smaller  particles  would  give  a  greater 
total  surface  area  in  the  clay  for  bonding 
purposes,  and  microscopic  study  shows  that 
a  very  fine-grained  clay  evenly  coats  the 
sand  grains  while  another  clay  of  larger 
particle  size  coats  the  quartz  grains  irregu- 
larly with  many  large  clay  lumps  between 
grains  that  can  have  little  influence  on  the 
strength  of  the  sand-clay  mixture. 

In  the  clays  studied,  the  sample  composed 
of  the  finest  particles  has  the  greatest 
strength  (No.  1).  However,  sample  No.  2 
with  about  the  same  clay  mineral  composi- 
tion is  composed  of  much  larger  particles 
and  yet  has  about  the  same  strength  as  sam- 
ple No.  1.  Data  from  other  samples  support 
the  conclusion  that  a  raw  clay  need  not 
necessarily  be  composed  of  extremely  minute 
particles  ( — 0.001  mm.)  to  be  a  good  com- 
mercial bonding  clay.  In  fact  a  clay  com- 
posed of  somewhat  coarser  particles  of  clay 
mineral  may  have  certain  advantages  over 
one  composed  only  of  extremely  minute 
particles.  If  the  coarser  clay  contains  clay 
mineral  particles  that  break  down  into  mi- 
nute particles  with  fair  rapidity  when  the 
clay  is  worked,  the  clay  will  probably  have 
better  durability  because  breaking  down  of 
the  clay  mineral  particles  will  continue  to 
provide  new  bonding  surfaces  as  the  clay  is 
being  used. 

It  should  be  emphasized  that  only  the 
clay  mineral  particles  in  a  clay  possess  bond- 
ing strength'',  and  that  only  the  clay  mineral 
particles  can  easily  and  readily  be  broken 
into  smaller  sizes  when  the  clay  is  worked, 
e.ff.,  in  mulling.  The  clay  mineral  particles 
are  flake-shaped  and  their  breakdown  tends 
to  take  place  by  cleavage  of  the  flakes.  Al- 
though clay  mineral  particles  tend  to  occur 
in  clays  generally  in  particles  less  than 
0.002  mm.,  individuals  and  aggregates  are 
frequently  0.020  mm.  or  more  in  diameter 
in  many  clays  and  shales. 


In  general  the  clays  studied  that  have  a 
relatively  even  distribution  of  particles,  be- 
tween 0.020  mm.  and  0.0005  mm.,  also 
have  high  green  compression  strength.  The 
explanation  seems  to  be  that  such  clays  do 
not  contain  large  amounts  of  non-clay  min- 
eral material  in  particles  smaller  than  0.020 
mm.  and  also  that  they  are  composed  of  clay 
mineral  particles  and  aggregates  that  break 
down  with  reasonable  rapidity  into  extreme- 
ly minute  particles.  A  critical  consideration 
of  the  data  indicates  that  a  clay  composed  of 
large  clay  mineral  particles  that  does  not 
break  down  into  very  fine  particles  is  not 
a  satisfactory  bonding  clay.  On  the  other 
hand  a  satisfactory  bonding  clay  is  not  neces- 
sarily one  composed  only  of  very  fine  parti- 
cles, or  of  larger  particles  that  break  down 
immediately  when  the  clay  is  first  used.  A 
clay  composed  of  particles  that  break  down 
with  intermediate  ease  is  apt  to  be  a  most 
satisfactory  bonding  clay  (other  factors  of 
clay  mineral  composition,  etc.,  being  equal). 

Those  clays  studied  that  show  an  irregu- 
ular  distribution  between  0.020  mm.  and 
0.005  mm.  are  also  those  that  contain  a  large 
amount  of  non-clay  mineral  material,  or  an 
abundance  of  large  clay  mineral  particles 
that  do  not  break  down  easily.  In  either 
case  the  sample  has  low  bonding  value  be- 
cause it  contains  a  large  proportion  of  ma- 
terial wnth  little  or  no  bonding  power. 

SIGNIFICANCE  OF  CLAY 
MINERAL   COMPOSITION 

Data  obtained  in  the  present  work  sub- 
stantiate the  conclusion  of  an  earlier  paper" 
that  the  clay  mineral  composition  is  the 
most  important  factor  in  determining  the 
bonding  strength  of  a  clay.  The  data  also 
verify  the  conclusion  that  montmorillonite 
is  the  clay  mineral  providing  the  highest 
strength  (samples  1  and  2),  and  that  the 
presence  of  a  small  amount  of  montmorillo- 
nite in  a  clay  will  raise  the  bonding  strength 
out  of  all  proportion  to  the  actual  amount 
of  the  montmorillonite.  This  is  illustrated 
by  comparing  the  green  compression  strength 
of  samples  4  and  5,  which  contain  small 
amounts  of  montmorillonite  in  addition  to 
kaolinite  and  illite,  with  samples  7  to  12 
which  contain  only  kaolinite  and  illite. 

The  present  data  show  that  kaolinite  and 
most  illite  materials  have  much  lower  bond- 
ing strength  than  clays  composed  of  mont- 
morillonite,   and    that   kaolinite   clays   have 


CHARACTERISTICS  OF  BONDING  CLAYS 


31 


higher  strength  than  most  illite  materials. 
The  characteristics  of  illite  vary  within  wide 
limits  and  the  data  indicates  that  occasion- 
ally an  illite  clay  may  have  very  high  bond- 
ing power.  For  example,  sample  No.  3  com- 
posed largely  of  illite  has  very  high  strength. 
Chemical  data,  obtained  in  another  study, 
show  that  there  is  a  range  in  the  potassium 
oxide  (KgO)  content  of  the  illite  clay  min- 
erals, and  that  in  general  clay  materials 
composed  of  illite  with  relatively  high 
K2O  content  have  low  green  compression 
strength. 

It  is  significant  that  one  of  the  attributes 
of  montmorillonite  and  the  certain  illite 
{e.ff.,  sample  No.  3)  is  that  they  either 
occur  in  extremely  minute  particles  or  in 
larger  particles  that  break  down  easily  into 
very  small  particles.  Kaolinite  and  illite, 
particularly  illite  with  a  high  K^O  content, 
tend  to  occur  in  particles  of  larger  size  that 
break  down  with  difficulty  into  particles  of 
very  small  size.  One,  but  probably  not  the 
only  reason  for  the  difference  in  bonding 
power  of  the  different  clay  minerals,  is  the 
variation  in  the  ease  with  which  they  break 
down  into  very  fine  particle  size. 

A  comparison  of  samples  2  and  8  empha- 
sizes the  importance  of  the  clay  mineral  com- 
position in  determining  bonding  strength. 
Sample  No.  2  has  much  less  material  finer 
than  0.0005  mm.  and  much  more  material 
coarser  than  0.020  mm.  than  has  sample 
No.  8,  yet  sample  2  is  the  stronger  clay 
because  it  is  composed  of  montmorillonite. 
In  both  samples  the  actual  amount  of  clay 
mineral  is  about  the  same. 

INFLUENCE  OF  THE  AMOUNT 
OF  CLAY  MINERAL 

The  data  in  table  2  illustrate  that  there 
is  a  relation  between  the  amount  of  clay 
mineral  in  clay  materials  of  the  same  clay 
mineral  composition  and  their  bonding 
strength.  Thus  samples  13  and  14  with  low 
clay  mineral  content  have  very  low  bond 
strength.   The  data  suggest  further  that  the 


non-clay  mineral  content  does  not  reduce 
the  bond  strength  of  a  clay  or  shale  very 
much  unless  there  is  more  than  about  30 
per  cent  of  it  present.  In  other  words  non- 
clay  mineral  matter  tends  to  have  little 
effect  on  bond  strength  unless  it  makes  up 
more  than  30  per  cent  of  the  total  clay 
material. 

SUMMARY 

The  green  compression  strength  of  four- 
teen clays  of  widely  different  compositions 
was  determined,  at  8  per  cent  clay  and  92 
per  cent  sand  (except  bentonite — 4  per  cent 
clay  and  96  per  cent  sand). 

Pipette  analyses  of  these  clays  were  made 
using  mild  disaggregation  procedure.  These 
analyses  show  approximately  the  effective 
particle  sizes  of  the  clays  as  they  exist  when 
the  clay  is  used  in  the  foundry. 

An  analysis  of  the  size  distribution  of  the 
clays  in  conjunction  with  their  green  com- 
pression strength  shows  that  those  clays 
which  break  down  with  intermediate  ease 
are  apt  to  be  most  satisfactory  (other  fac- 
tors of  clay  mineral  composition,  etc.,  being 
equal). 

A  comparison  of  the  kind  of  clay  min- 
eral with  bonding  strength  indicates  that 
clays  composed  of  montmorillonite  have  the 
greatest  green  compression  strength.  Clays 
composed  of  kaolinite  and  illite  have  lower 
bonding  strength.  An  example  of  an  unus- 
ual illite  clay  is  given  that  has  high  green 
compression  strength.  A  small  amount  of 
montmorillonite  present  in  a  mixture  with 
either  kaolinite  or  illite  yields  a  bonding 
strength  out  of  all  proportion  to  the  amount 
of  montmorillonite  present 

The  presence,  in  amounts  greater  than 
about  30  per  cent,  of  such  materials  as 
quartz,  calcite  and/or  large  clay  mineral 
flakes  which  do  not  break  down  easily  causes 
low  bonding  strength. 

There  is  a  relation  between  the  amount 
of  clay  mineral  and  the  bonding  strength 
in  clays  of  the  same  clay  mineral  content. 


32 


PHYSICAL  AND  MINERALOGICAL 


BIBLIOGRAPHY 


1.  Grim,  R.  E.,  Elements  of  the  petrographic 
study  of  bonding  clays  and  of  the  clay  substance 
of  bonding  sands:  Trans.  Am.  Eoundrymen's  Assoc, 
vol.  47,  pp.  895-908  (1940).  See  this  Rept.  Inv., 
pp.  5-11. 

2.  Testing  and  Grading  Foundry  Sands  and 
Clays:  Am.  Eoundrymen's  Assoc,  1938  edition, 
pp.  26-27. 

3.  Jackson,  C.  E.,  and  Saeger,  C.  M.,  Jr.,  Use 
of  pipette  in  the  fineness  test  of  molding  sands: 
Jour,  of  Research,  U.  S.  Bureau  of  Standards,  pp. 
59-66,   1935. 


4.  Krumbein,  W.  C,  Size  frequency  distribution 
of  sediments:  Jour.  Sedimentary  Petrology,  vol.  4, 
pp.  65-77,  1934. 

5.  Grim,  R.  E.,  and  Schubert,  C.  E.,  Mineral 
composition  and  texture  of  the  clay  substances  of 
molding  sands:  Trans.  Am.  Eoundrymen's  Assoc, 
vol.  47  pp.  935-953,  1940;  see  this  Rept.  Inv.  pp. 
12-23. 

6.  Grim,  R.  E.,  Bray,  R.  H.,  and  Bradley,  W.  F., 
The  constitution  of  bond  clays  and  its  influence  on 
bonding  properties:  Trans.  Am.  Eoundrymen's 
Assoc,  vol.  44,  pp.  211-228,  1936. 


ILLINOIS  STATE  GEOLOGICAL  SURVEY 

Report  of  Investgations  No.  69,  1940