MAKERS
of the
MUSLIM
WORLD
Ahmad Riza Khan
Barelwi
In the Path of the Prophet
Usha Sanjal
ONEWOKLD
prelims. 044 10/12/2004 4:09 PM Pag€Ai
c^
Ahmad Riza
Khan Barelwi
^>
^>
^>
prelims. 044 10/12/2004 4:09 PM Pa
SELECTION OF TITLES INTHE MAKERS OF
THE MUSLIMWORLD SERIES
Series editor: Patricia Crone,
Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton
Abd al-Malik, Chase F. Robinson
Abd al-Rahman III, Maribel Fierro
Abu Nuwas, Philip Kennedy
Ahmad ibn Hanbal, Christopher Melchert
Ahmad Riza Khan Barelwi, Usha Sanval
Al-Ma'mun, Michael Cooperson
r^\ Al-Mutanabbi, Margaret Larkin _T^_
Amir Khusraw, Sunil Sharma
El Hajj BeshirAgha, Jane Hathawav
Fazlallah Astarabadi and the Hurufis, Shazad Bashir
Ibn Arabi, William C. Chittick
Ibn FuJi, Ahmad Dallal
Ikhwan al-Safa, Godefroid de Callatav
Shaykh Mujid, Tumima. Bavhom-Daou
For current information and details of other books in the
series, please visit www. oneworld-publications.com/
subjects/makers-of- muslim-world.htm
^>
prelims. 044 10/12/2004 4:09 PM Page-si i±
&
Ahmad Riza
Khan Barelwi
In the Path of the Prophet
^>
USHA SANYAL
ONEWORLD
OXFORD
^>
prelims. 044 10/12/2004 4:09 PM Pag^-xiv
AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
Oneworld Publications
(Sales and Editorial)
1 85 Banbury Road
Oxford OX2 7AR
England
www. oneworld -publications, com
© Usha Sanyal 2005
All rights reserved
Copyright under Berne Convention
A CIP record for this title is available
from the British Library
ISBN 1-85168-359-3
Typeset by Jayvee, India
Cover and text designed by Design Deluxe
Printed and bound in India bvThomson Press Ltd
NL08
^>
prelims. 044 10/12/2004 4:09 PM Pa
^
TO WILLIAM R. ROFF,
MY USTAD
^>
^>
^>
prelims. 044 10/12/2004 4:09 PM Pag^-xvi
O
"&
O
prelims. 044 10/12/2004 4:09 PM Page-svii
CONTENTS
Preface x
Acknowledgments xii
1 THE EIGHTEENTH- AND NINETEENTH-
CENTURY BACKGROUND 1
The Mughal Empire 1
The North Indian Successor States 4
The History of Rohilkhand S
British India under the East India Company 7
2 THE MUSLIM RESPONSE 19
-(J)- ShahWali Ullah 22
Farangi Mahall : Training Employees for the
Muslim States 26
Nineteenth-century Reform Movements 28
3 AHMAD RIZA KHAN: LIFE OF A MUSLIM
SCHOLAR SI
Rampur State S3
Ahmad Riza's Education and Scholarly Training SS
Scholarly Imprint of his Father 56
Exemplary Stories 57
Sufi Discipleship to Shah Al-e Rasul of Marehra 61
The Importance of Dreams 61
Savvids of the Qadiri Order of Sufis 62
Going on Pilgrimage, 1 878 63
Ahmad Riza as Mujaddid 64
Fatwa Writing 66
^>
prelims. 044 10/12/2004 4:09 PM Pa
g€~x viii
viii AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
Hidden Cues in a Fatwa, or what a Fatwa may not
tell us 68
Ahmad Riza's Fatawa 70
Two Fatawa Written during Ahmad Riza's Second
Pilgrimage to Mecca 73
Political Issues in the Earlv Teens and Twenties 77
Hijrat Movement 8 1
Ahmad Riza's Popularity among Core Followers 83
Passing on the Leadership 84
4 AHMAD RIZA KHAN'S BELIEF SYSTEM AND
WORLDVIEW 87
Ahmad Riza as a Sufi 89
The Perfect Pir 90
Controversy about Sufi Intercession 91
The Three Circles of Discipleship 92
Shaikh' Abd al-Qadir Jilani and the Importance
of the Qadiri Order 94
Love of the Prophet 96
Sufi Rituals 100
Relations with other Muslims 1 02
The Accusations of Unbelief 107
Relations with Non-Muslims: Hindus and the British 109
5 AHL-E SUNNAT INSTITUTIONS AND
SPREAD OF THE MOVEMENT BEYOND
BAREILLY 111
Seminaries (Madrasas) 1 1 1
Printing Presses and Publications 113
Voluntarv Associations and Oral Debates 1 1 S
Generational Fissures in the Movement 118
Assessment of the Importance of the Movement in
Relation to other Movements 122
^>
prelims. 044 10/12/2004 4:09 PM Pa
CONTENTS
6 AHMAD RIZA'S LEGACY 127
Ahmad Riza's 'Urs in India and Pakistan 1 29
Ahl-e Sunnat/Barelwis in the Diaspora 131
Glossary 133
Major landmarks in South Asian history from
the eighteenth to the twentieth centuries 1 35
Bibliography 138
Index 143
"0" "&
^>
prelims. 044 10/12/2004 4:09 PM Pa
^
O
"&
O
prelims. 044 10/12/2004 4:09 PM Pa«Axi
PREFACE
T!
1 he subject of this book is an Indian Muslim scholar of the
late nineteenth— ear lv twentieth centuries, Ahmad Riza
Khan Barelwi (1856—1921). His writings and the interpret-
ation of Islam they espouse laid the foundation for a movement
known to its followers as the Ahl-e Sunnat wa Jama' at ("the
devotees of the Prophet's practice and the broad community")
and to all others as "Barelwi," an adjective derived from
Bareillv, the town where Ahmad Riza was born and where he
lived. It also forms the last part of his name. The movement was
one of several reformist groups to have emerged in British India
during the late nineteenth century. Like their rivals, the
-(^y— Barelwis today have a large following in South Asia, as well as in — (^y-
Britain and other parts of the world where South Asian
Muslims have migrated.
What distinguishes the Barelwis from the other reformist
groups (Deobandis, the Ahl-e Hadith, and others) is their atti-
tude to the relationship of the transcendant to this world. While
the other groups reject sufism or Islamic mysticism either wholly
or in part, and deny the importance of saintlv mediators, mir-
acles, and other manifestations of the holy in the here and now,
the Barelwis embrace everything associated with sufism as an
intrinsic part of their identity. But they share with the other
reformists a strong focus on the Prophet Muhammad as a model
of correct behavior and an example of the virtues that every
Muslim should strive to cultivate and that he or she should live by.
j
Unlike some of the other Muslim reformist groups, Ahmad
Riza defined religious communitv in cultural rather than
political terms. When Indian Muslims began to engage in
^>
prelims. 044 10/12/2004 4:09 PM Page-sxii
xii AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
national politics in the early twentieth century, he advised his
followers against it, arguing that the classical Islamic sources
did not support political action against British rule in India, as
the British had not interfered in the Muslims' internal affairs or
religious institutions. This led to a split in the movement, with
some Barelwi leaders following his advice and others rebelling.
In some respects, Ahmad Riza and the Barelwi movement in
general seem paradoxical. Thus, while Ahmad Riza's interpret-
ation of Islam was deeply rooted in South Asian culture, he
based his arguments on the classical Islamic sources and looked
to the religious leaders of Mecca and Medina for validation
and approval. And while he was a reformist in the sense of
demanding that his followers be personally responsible for
their own salvation, the kind of model Muslim person he
visualized was one who embraced rather than shunned ritual
intermediaries and a ritualistic style of "worshiping God. One
might say that he "wanted his followers to use reformist reli-
\7" gious methods so as to be better, and more individually driven, —kzj~
traditionalists.
^>
prelims. 044 10/12/2004 4:09 PM PaKxxlii
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
b;
i ill Roff, to whom I dedicate the book, guided the original
'Ph.D. dissertation on "which this book is based, and has lent
me his sage advice over many years even after he retired and
returned to his home in Scotland. David Gilmartin has helped
me think about the material in new ways which have found
their way into this book. And Patricia Crone asked difficult
questions and showed me that writing a little book can be
harder than writing a big one. I would also like to thank the
anonymous reviewer of the manuscript for making anumber of
suggestions which I have incorporated here.
I owe a great debt of gratitude to members of mv familv: mv
-(zy— dear friend (and sister-in-law), Rupa Bose, who was mv first — (^3~
reader and urged me to try and make the material both inter-
esting and relevant to as wide an audience as possible. Gautam
Bose, mv husband, gave me time to write on weekends and
holidays, while keeping our two bovs, Girish and Arun (who
are eight and six, respectively) entertained and out of mischief.
And to mv mother, Vina Sanyal, who has supported my aca-
demic endeavors in myriad "ways over the years from far-awav
New Delhi, a heartfelt thank you.
^>
prelims. 044 10/12/2004 4:09 PM Pagc-xxiv
-&
Centers of Ahl-e Sunnat (Barelwi) Influence in the
late 19th and early 20th centuries in North India
250 miles
500km
. UNITED
Muradabad. # Rampur
DELHI ■ . 'Pilibhit
Bareilly
Badayun
Marahra
-f»
# Sitapur
°Khairabad
Bilgram*
S, l PROVINCES
1 I
Jabalpur
<t>
Patna
^>
Map by MAPgrafix
^>
chl.044 10/12/2004 4:11 PM Page 1
THE EIGHTEENTH- AND
NINETEENTH -CENTURY
BACKGROUND
;
[n India, strong Muslim rule under the Mughal empire gave
way in the course of the eighteenth century to weak central
control and the establishment of a number of regional king-
doms "which were independent of the Mughals in all but name.
vv They in turn soon became indebted to the East India Companv, T7
which had started out as a trading companv in 1 600 but bv the
earlv nineteenth centurv had assumed a number of important
political functions, the most important of which was the col-
lection of land taxes. In 1858, after a failed Indian revolt against
the East India Companv, the British Crown assumed formal
control of India and the East India Companv "was dissolved.
THE MUGHAL EMPIRE
For three centuries (1526 to 1857), India was ruled by the
Mughals, who were Sunni Muslims of Central Asian descent.
The founder of the empire was Babur (r. 1 526—30), who swept
into India from present-dav Afghanistan, but whose brief reign
left him no time to consolidate his gains in north India. It was
his grandson Akbar (r. 15 56—1605) who made a lasting
^>
chl.044 10/12/2004 4:11 PM Page 2
2 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
impression on India and gave the empire a firm foundation.
From their capital in the north (Delhi for the most part, though
Akbar chose Agra and other cities as well), the Mughal emper-
ors expanded the border in all directions. Starting from the
northwest, including what are today Afghanistan and Pakistan,
the empire expanded eastward to the Gangetic plain during
Akbar 's reign, going as far as 'what is today Bangladesh. To the
north, the Himalayan mountains constituted a natural border,
preventing further conquest in that direction. Central and
southern India "were ruled by independent kings, some Hindu,
some Muslim, until well into Akbar 's reign. In fact, the south
was not incorporated into the Mughal empire until about a cen-
tury later, during Aurangzeb's long reign (r. 165 8— 1707), and
even then the very southern tip of India remained independent.
It was an agrarian empire, centered around the person and
authority of the king. Land taxes constituted its main source of
revenue. Since the majoritv of the Indian population was
\7" Hindu, during his fifty-year rule Akbar set about winning —kzj~
hearts and minds by including Hindu princes in all branches of
government and even bv marrying Hindu princesses. His
eldest son, Salim (later Emperor Jahangir) had a Hindu mother,
as did his grandson, Emperor Shah Jahan. At the same time, he
showed his respect for popular Muslim religious figures. He
paid homage to a particular lineage of Muslim mystics, or sufis,
whose hospice was in the western Indian city of Ajmer. A story
is told of how in 1 570 he walked from his capital Fatehpur Sikri
(near Agra), in the north, to Ajmer in the west, a distance of
about two hundred miles, in a gesture of thanksgiving after the
birth of his son Salim. Ajmer was the burial place of a thir-
teenth-centurv sufi whose intercession with God, the emperor
believed, had been instrumental in his son's birth. In the first
half of his reign, he also sponsored pilgrim ships from India's
west coast to Mecca, sending generous gifts to that city. In
sum, Akbar's religious eclecticism and inclusiveness helped
^>
chl.044 10/12/2004 4:11 PM Page 3
EIGHTEENTH- AND NINETEENTH-CENTURY BACKGROUND 3
Indianize the foreign Mughals and strengthened and stabilized
the empire. (In the second half of his reign, Akbar encouraged a
personality cult around himself, inventing a new "religion"
with elements of different faiths, alienating a number of
Muslims as a result.)
Mughal decline began in the late 1600s during the reign of
Akbar's great-grandson Aurangzeb (r. 165 8— 1707) and accel-
erated throughout the eighteenth century. Although historians
argue about what caused the decline, a number of factors "were
at work: Aurangzeb 's reversal of Akbar's religious policvisheld
by some to have been crucial, for he alienated a number of
Hindu princely families bv excluding them from positions of
power and imposing on them a tax which Akbar had abolished
(the jizya). In fact, the second half of Aurangzeb 's reign was
spent in incessant and, in the end, futile warfare against a minor
Hindu chieftain, Shivaji (d. 1680) , who eventually carved out a
small kingdom along India's west coast and expanded it bv war-
\7" fare and diplomatic alliances with other Hindu rulers. In time, —kzj~
he and his successors (collectively known as the Marathas)
were even able to challenge the Mughals in the north, the cen-
ter of Mughal power. The financial drain of Aurangzeb 's mili-
tary campaigns on the empire's resources contributed to the
collapse.
After Aurangzeb 's death in 1 707, the eighteenth century saw
a succession of weak rulers. This encouraged foreigners to
invade or try to take over. In 1 739 the military general-turned-
emperor Nadir Shah invaded north India from Persia in the
west. Taking Lahore (now in Pakistan) injanuarv of that year, he
proceeded to march into Delhi a few months later. According
to Juan Cole, "the savage looting of the capital later perpetrated
by his troops constituted] one of the century's great disasters"
(1989:41) .The next major attack was launched bv the Afghans,
also from the northwest. In 1761, Ahmad Shah Abdali (later
stvled "Durrani") fought the Marathas at Panipat, fiftv miles
^>
chl.044 10/12/2004 4:11 PM Page 4
4 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
northwest of Delhi, where two important battles fought in
earlier centuries had given the Mughals control over India.
This, the Third Battle of Panipat, was "won by Ahmad Shah, and
could have led to Afghan rule over India had Ahmad Shah's
troops not been wearv of war and anxious to return home. The
power vacuum in Delhi was soon to be filled bv vet another
foreign power, the British East India Company.
THE NORTH INDIAN SUCCESSOR STATES
Apart from the foreign threats to the Mughal empire in the
eighteenth century, it was also subject to internal fissures. In
north India, one of the most significant new developments "was
the rise of Shi 'ism as the state religion in two of the largest
Muslim successor states, Bengal andAwadh (known as"Oudh"
in British sources) . The kingdom of Awadh was founded by
-(^y— Burhan ul-Mulk in 1722 and was centered in Lucknow in the — (^y-
Gangetic plain. It grew in power under the first three gover-
nors or nawabs (Burhan ul-Mulk, Safdar Jang, and Shuja ud-
Dawla) over the next fiftv vears. After Nadir Shah's invasion in
1739, the Mughal emperors were probably less powerful than
the nawabs of Awadh. Although Shuja ud-Dawla, the third gov-
ernor, stopped short of proclaiming Awadh's total independ-
ence from Mughal rule, continuing to mint coins in the
emperor's name and having the Friday sermon read in his
name, for all practical purposes the state operated independ-
ently. State affairs (diplomacv, economic policv, the appoint-
ment of officials and successors to the governorship) were
conducted without reference to the Mughal emperor.
As both Cole and Francis Robinson (2001) explain, the cul-
ture of the Bengal and Awadh courts was fed bv a constant
influx of Shi'i Muslims from Iran and Iraq. Indeed, the govern-
ors of Awadh were themselves of Iranian (Nishapuri) origin.
^>
chl.044 10/12/2004 4:11 PM Page 5
EIGHTEENTH- AND NINETEENTH-CENTURY BACKGROUND 5
This "was a time of political instability in Iran as well, and
Iranians and Iraqis of all professions were eager to seek their
fortunes in either Bengal or Awadh. Spear speculates that had
the British East India Company not intervened in India in the
mid- 1700s, the governors of both states would probablv have
tried to consolidate their power at the expense of the Mughals
and/or each other, but would then have had to deal with the
Marathas (Spear, 1981: 76—77). But British intervention pre-
vented the plaving out of this rather dismal scenario.
Despite Awadh's fairly rapid political decline in the latter
part of the eighteenth centurv, Shi'ism continued to influence
the political and cultural landscape of the eastern Gangetic
plain throughout the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.
Indeed, at the end of the nineteenth century Ahmad Riza Khan
wrote frequently about the negative influence of Shi'ism in
his home territory of Rohilkhand, west of Lucknow, urging his
followers to refrain from participating in Shi'i rituals and
\7" practices. ~x3~
THE HISTORY OF ROHILKHAND
Closer to home for Ahmad Riza Khan and his family is the his-
tory of the Rohilla Afghans, after whom the region earned its
name, Rohilkhand. The region around Bareillv, Ahmad Riza
Khan's birthplace, 'was (and is) known as Rohilkhand, having
been settled by the Rohilla Afghans in the seventeenth and eight-
eenth centuries. In the mid-eighteenth century Rohilkhand
came under the authority of Hafiz Rahmat Khan (d. 1774) who
was a forceful and strong leader who might have succeeded in
making Rohilkhand a lasting regional power had there been
fewer players vying for control over north India.
But this was not to be. Instead, the constant state of warfare
finally forced the Rohillas to seek Awadh's help in order to beat
^>
chl.044 10/12/2004 4:11 PM Page 6
6 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
back the Marathas. This in turn gave Awadh, under Shuja
ud-Dawla, an excuse to take over in 1774 after Hafiz Rahmat
Khan was killed in battle. Rohilkhand was thus absorbed into
the state of Awadh. But bv this time Awadh had become
financiallv dependent on the East India Companv (indeed, the
latter had helped Awadh in its annexation of Rohilkhand).
Consequently, in 1801 Awadh had to cede Rohilkhand to the
East India Companv as part repayment of its debt. It was to
remain under Companv rule until 1 858, when India became a
part of the British Empire and Rohilkhand became part of the
new state known as the Northwest Provinces.
Economically, it is important to note, Rohilkhand had
enjoved considerable prosperity in the early period of its his-
tory under Afghan Rohilla rule. A rich alluvial plain in the
foothills of the Himalayas, it was deemed one of the most fer-
tile regions in the subcontinent in the earlv eighteenth centurv.
But after it came under Awadh's rule, heavv revenue demands
\7" — made by Awadh in order to pav off its own debts to the East —kzj~
India Company — impoverished its people. Subsequently, simi-
lar demands by the East India Company led to indebtedness and
rackrenting in the countryside.
Meanwhile, another facet of the political situation in the late
eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries is of interest to us as
part of Ahmad Riza Khan's family background, namely, the cre-
ation and growth of the independent state of Rampur, north-
west of Bareillv. Rampur was the only Rohilla principality to
survive the vicissitudes of the times and to continue to enjoy
independence as a princely state under British rule. Rampur
state was created by Faizullah Khan, who had fought by Hafiz
Rahmat 's side for over twenty years "when the latter was killed
in 1774, and had a reputation for bravery and leadership. Thus
the mantle of leadership naturallv fell to him.
However, as Rohilkhand had just been absorbed into Awadh,
he had no territorial base of his own. Warren Hastings, then the
^>
chl.044 10/12/2004 4:11 PM Page 7
EIGHTEENTH- AND NINETEENTH-CENTURY BACKGROUND 7
Governor of Bengal, concluded a treaty with him, granting him
the small estate of Rampur (about 900 square miles) situated
north of the citv of Bareillv. Faizullah Khan thus became the first
nawab of Rampur. Interestingly, although the Rampur nawabs'
ancestors were Afghans — and Sunni Muslims — after the 1 840s
most of the Rampur nawabs were followers of Shi 'ism.
Bv around 1800, the Marathas were no longer a threat in
north India, having retreated to western India and split up into
four separate confederate states, each of whom owed alle-
giance to the confederate chief or Peshwa in Pune. Bengal and
Awadh had by now both come under the political and eco-
nomic control of the East India Company: Bengal succumbed at
the Battle of Plassev, thereby setting in motion East India
Company rule over much of India for the next hundred years.
Awadh, itself formally under Mughal rule, became increasingly
indebted to the Company, and gradually, from 1775 to
1801, ceded parts of its territory to the British after Shuja
\7" ud-Dawla's death in 1774. Indirect rule over Awadh bv the —kzj~
British was to continue until its formal annexation in 1856, a
year before the Revolt.
BRITISH INDIA UNDERTHE
EAST INDIA COMPANY
If in the eighteenth century the British were one of several con-
tenders for power in the wake of Aurangzeb's death and the
weak rule of his successors, in the nineteenth they were
unquestionably the most important power holders in India. This
was not at all what they had intended, for the British had come
to India as traders rather than as conquerers. The East India
Companv, formed in 1600, was but one of several European
trading companies to come to India in search of "exotic" items
of trade — chiefly spices, but also silks, fine handspun cottons,
^>
chl.044 10/12/2004 4:11 PM Page 8
8 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
saltpetre (which had military uses), and other items. The other
companies were Portuguese, Dutch, and French. The weak-
ening of the Mughal empire in the first half of the eighteenth
centurv coincided with European rivalries at home (during the
Napoleonic wars, the War of Austrian Succession in the 1740s,
and the Seven Years' War in the 1750s and 1760s) between the
British and French, leading them into proxy wars in Bengal and
south India. In the 1760s Robert Clive of the East India
Company secured the diwani or revenue-collection rights to
large parts of Bengal and Bihar, after driving the French out of
south India. Gaining the right to the diwani was a milestone, for
it allowed the British to pay for their purchases with Bengal's
tax revenue, thereby making the annual export of bullion from
Britain to India unnecessary.
Despite safeguards against abuse (for Clive and his men
made small personal fortunes after their victories at Plassev
and Buxar in the 1 75 0s and 1 760s) put in place bv the Board of
\7" Directors in London, Company officials continued to enrich —kzj~
themselves personally until forbidden to engage in private
trade in the 1790s. In 1813 missionaries and private traders
were allowed into the country bv an Act of Parliament, and in
1833 the Company lost its monopolv on trade in everything
but opium and salt. Conquest of further territorv, some direct
and some indirect, followed swiftlv during the first half of the
nineteenth century. Under the pattern of indirect rule set in
place by Clive, local rulers "were allowed to retain their thrones
but forced to concede to certain vital annual demands for
revenue, which ultimately drove them into crippling debt to
the Company. This in turn led, in due course, to the East India
Company's assumption of political power.
A few dates will suffice to illustrate the pace of British
annexation of territorv, for these events are well known: in
1 801 Madras Presidency "was formed in the south, in 1 803 the
British defeated the Mughal emperor in Delhi and made him a
^>
chl.044 10/12/2004 4:11 PM Page 9
EIGHTEENTH- AND NINETEENTH-CENTURY BACKGROUND 9
pensioner, in 1818 parts of the Maratha confederacy were
taken over to form the bulk of Bombav Presidency, in 1 848 the
Panjab was annexed, in the 1 840s seven princely states were
taken over in as many years under the Doctrine of Lapse (which
forbade a ruler from choosing an adopted son as successor in
the absence of a natural-born son and held that such a kingdom
came under Company rule by default), and in 18S6 the
Nawab of Awadh was forced to give up his throne on grounds of
incompetence.
In 1 857— 58, parts of the country rose in the anti-British
rebellion known (in British accounts) as the Mutinv, though
it was in fact much more broad-based than a mutinv, for it
included peasants and landlords as "well as soldiers. When the
Revolt was finally put down in 1858, the anomaly of East India
Companv rule was replaced bv the more normal mode of
government called Crown rule, and the East India Companv
was dissolved. The last Mughal emperor, Bahadur Shah Zafar,
\7" was banished to Rangoon, Burma, where he lived out the rest —kzj~
of his days, after the British had murdered his sons to make sure
there would be no heirs. (In an interesting parallel to this sad
episode, in 1 885 the ruler of Burma was banished to western
India for the rest of his life after the British takeover of that
kingdom.)
Economic Consequences of British Rule
Alongside the sweeping political changes indicated by these
events were profound changes taking place in the areas under
British control in the economic, legal, educational, and other
spheres. The economic sphere was of course central to British
concerns, and changes here began with the Permanent
Settlement of Bengal in 1793. The British attempt to under-
stand local land tenure systems "was motivated bv the desire to
increase productivity and hence annual tax revenues — this
^>
chl.044 10/12/2004 4:11 PM Page 1C
10 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
being the raison d'etre for the acquisition of territory by the
Company. Seeing private property as the kev to creating a class
of "improving" landlords on the British model and hence to
ensuring future agricultural productivity, in 1793 Lord
Cornwallis, as Governor-General of Bengal, conferred private
ownership rights in perpetuitv on a number of Bengal
zamindars or landlords, "who "were required in return to meet a
"high and inflexible" annual revenue demand (Metcalf and
Metcalf,2002:77).
However, the experiment failed. Under the indigenous svs-
tem, the zamindar could "sell or transfer onlv his own revenue
collecting rights, not the land itself, for that did not belong to
him." If the peasants on his land felt overburdened, thev could
move to another part of the countrv where conditions were
better. However, under the new system, all the zamindars, now
owners of the land and liable to high taxes in good and bad
years, were under an onerous burden themselves. Manv were
\7" unable to pav the taxes and had no choice but to put their —kzj~
estates up for sale. Far from being improving landlords, a num-
ber of them sold their land to city-dwelling magnates who had
the money to treat their estates as an investment (though with-
out any incentive to "improve" them) at the tenants' expense.
As for the tenants, they "were reduced to the status of "tenants
with no rights" (Metcalf and Metcalf, 2002: 77) and few
options. Squeezed bv the tax burden from above and unable to
find better terms elsewhere (as all the landlords now enforced
the same high revenue demand), in time they became a class of
landless bonded labor. A third of the estates are believed to have
changed hands in the first twenty years following the
Settlement of 1 79 3 .
In the years ahead, various alternatives were tried in other
parts of India, ranging from assessments being revised every
twenty or thirty vears to ownership being fixed on the tenants
(ryots) rather than the landlords, in south India. Meanwhile,
^>
chl.044 10/12/2004 4:11 PM Page 11
EIGHTEENTH- AND NINETEENTH-CENTURY BACKGROUND 11
new crops 'were introduced in Bengal and elsewhere. A highly
profitable trade in opium was started in Bengal in the 1 820s for
export to China. This complicated three-way trade allowed the
Company to pay for its exports from China with the proceeds
of opium sales in China, once again making unnecessary
the export of bullion from Britain. Opium "provided up to
1 S per cent of the Indian Government's total revenue" in the
1830s (Metcalf andMetcalf, 2002: 75).
Another important economic change in India in the earlv
1 800s was the substitution of factory-made British textiles for
handmade Indian cloth, which put Indian weavers in Bengal
out of work and increased pressure on the land. The destruc-
tion of the textile industry followed — British-made textiles
being cheaper to buy than the local product — initiating "the
development of a classicallv 'colonial' economv, importing
manufactures and exporting raw materials, [in a pattern]
that was to last for a century, until the 1920s." The Metcalfs
\7" conclude, "Overall, . . . the East India Companv during the early —kzj~
decades of the nineteenth centurv did little to set India
on a path of economic growth" (Metcalf and Metcalf, 2002:
75,76).
Improvements in Infrastructure
While the economy was dramatically affected in these and
other wavs during the earlv nineteenth century, infrastructural
developments had a lasting impact on Indians of all classes and
communities. Railroads and the telegraph were introduced
during Lord Dalhousie's governor-generalship in thel850s,
and a postal system and print technology were introduced,
making newspapers and periodicals available relativelv cheap lv.
To give but one example of how significant a change the "penny
post" represented, "[i]n the 1830s an exchange of letters
between Britain and India could take two years; bv 1 870, with
^>
chl.044 10/12/2004 4:11 PM Page 11
12 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
the opening of the Suez Canal [in the 1860s], a letter could
reach Bombay in only one month" (Metcalf and Metcalf, 2002:
97). Print technology, as we will see in subsequent chapters,
greatly facilitated the growth of Islamic (as well as other
religious) reform movements in the latter half of the nineteenth
century.
Change was occurring in almost every area of life at this
time. From the point of view of the north Indian 'ulama,
two areas were particularly significant, namely, education and
the law.
A British Model for India
Having become the colonial masters of India, the British had to
decide what direction they "wanted the country to take. What
was the British purpose in being in India, what did it hope to
achieve other than the economic and imperial goals of hegem-
ony? Answering this question also involved assessing the Indian
past. Did those who now governed India see anything of value
in India's linguistic and literarv heritage, its educational trad-
itions, its legal texts, and so on, or should Britain set in place a
whollv Western system, a wholly new set of institutions that
had no local roots "whatsoever?
This debate plaved out most famously in the fields of law and
education. Among those who spoke for the liberal position (the
term meant something different in the 1 800s than it does in US
politics in the earlv twenty-first century) were Lord William
Bentinck, Governor-General of India in the late 1 820s and early
1830s, and John Stuart Mill "who worked for the East India
Company from 1823 until 1858. Mill argued that different
peoples were at different stages in the "ladder" of "progress" but
could be advanced along the way by means of education and good
government. Charles Trevelvan, who served in India in the
^>
chl.044 10/12/2004 4:11 PM Page i:
EIGHTEENTH- AND NINETEENTH-CENTURY BACKGROUND 13
1 830s, 'was also among this group. He believed that British learn-
ing and institutions would put India on the path to "moral and
political improvement" (Metcalf, 2001: 28—33). Thomas B.
Macaulav is perhaps the best-known example of this position. In
a well-known statement in 1835, he said he wanted to put in
place a system of education which would "create not just a class
of Indians educated in the English language, who might assist the
British in ruling India, but one 'English in taste, in opinions, in
morals and in intellect' " (Metcalf, 2001 : 34) .
As Thomas Metcalf points out, this view was based on the
belief that all "races" "were inherentlv educable and none had to
remain perpetuallv on the lowest rung of the ladder of "civ-
ilization ."But it was also based on a negative assessment of non-
European cultures and their traditions of learning. Thus
Macaulav is famous for his dismissal of the "entire literature of
India and Arabia ... [as worth less than] a single shelf of a good
European librarv" (Metcalf, 2001: 34). This negative assess-
\7" ment of India stood in contrast with the views of an earlier gen- —kzj~
eration of officials and scholars such as Governor-General
Warren Hastings and Sir William Jones, a judge in the East India
Companv (d. 1794), who believed that India's rich textual
tradition was worthy of studv bv Europeans (which in turn
required the studv of languages, chieflv Sanskrit, but also
Arabic for an understanding of Muslim texts) , and that the
British could best rule by basing their laws on those of the
countrv itself.
"The outcome of British studv of the ancient texts, in Jones's
view," Metcalf writes, "was to be a 'complete digest' of the
Hindu and Muslim law, which could be enforced in the
Companv's courts, and would preserve 'inviolate' the rights of
the Indian people" (Metcalf, 2001 : 1 2). It was in this spirit — as
well as a desire to be independent of Brahmin interpreters he
considered unreliable — that Jones worked on his Digest
(Metcalf, 2001 : 24). It was published in 1798 bv his successor
^>
chl.044 10/12/2004 4:11 PM Page 14
14 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
H.T. Colebrooke.To be sure, Jones also graded European and
"Oriental" learning and their laws on a hierarchical scale in
which the European was superior to the Indian. Furthermore,
in his view of things, India's glorious past or "golden age" had
given wav to a state of decline in the present. Nevertheless, he
differed fundamentally from Macaulav and others of like mind
who devalued and belittled the Sanskritic and Arabo-Persian
literary traditions altogether, and who sought to base British
laws and education in India on Western traditions alone.
In the end, Macaulav and Mill carried the dav, though with-
out totallv rejecting Hastings' and Jones' vision. Since 1772
civil law had been based on religious affiliation, for Hindus and
Muslims were governed bv their own personal laws — Hindu
law for the former, and "Anglo -Mohammadan" law for
Muslims. In practice, the manner in which Islamic law was
implemented was much altered under the East India Companv.
As Zaman shows, certain medieval texts deemed authoritative
\7" bv the British were "invested with almost exclusive authority as ~x3~
the basis of judicial practice in British courts, as far as Muslim
personal law "was concerned" (Zaman, 2002: 22). Moreover,
the manner of their application was more rigid than it had been
in Mughal times, in keeping with the British desire to impose
uniformity and predictabilitv in the law. (Zaman points out that
the British were inconsistent in their application of the law too,
but this was described as exercising "discretion" rather than
being "arbitrary.")
Macaulav was instrumental, in the 1 860s, in drafting a new
penal code which replaced what the British saw as despotic
"Oriental" rule with "predictable rules and regulations for the
adjudication of disputes." Based on Jeremy Bentham's prin-
ciples of utilitarianism, the new laws also sought to promote
"unity, precision, and simplicity" (Metcalf, 2001: 37, 38).
Islamic criminal law ceased to be applied in the courts after this
time. Moreover, the muftis (and Brahmin pandits) who had
^>
chl.044 10/12/2004 4:11 PM Page
^>
EIGHTEENTH- AND NINETEENTH-CENTURY BACKGROUND 15
been employed to help British judges on matters of personal
religious law were no longer deemed necessary, and the pos-
ition of "native law officer" was abolished in 1864. Qadis (judges
who applied Islamic law) were frequently not appointed to
British Indian courts either. Thus the application of Anglo -
Muhammadan law in British Indian courts "was often in the
hands of non-Muslim judges. This made even simple matters
such as the dissolution of a marriage, for example, impossible,
as such a decision "was invalid in Muslim eyes if made by a non-
Muslim judge (Zaman, 2002: 25, 27). In the nineteenth cen-
tury the Deobandi 'ulama tried unsuccessfully to create an
alternative court of their own, but for a variety of reasons many
Muslims continued to use the British Indian courts (Metcalf,
1982: 147). As we shall see throughout this book, the primarv
response of the 'ulama to the loss of access to the courts under
British rule was to issue responsa (fatawa).The other alterna-
tive was to take the issue under dispute to a Muslim princely
\7" state "where British laws were not in place and where a qadi —kzj~
could be found.
Education was also a significant issue for the 'ulama during
British rule. During the late eighteenth century, Orientalist
scholars such as William Jones had promoted schools for the
education of maulwis and pandits who could assist Company
officials in the interpretation of Hindu and Muslim law, respect-
ively. Among the best-known schools of this period "were the
Calcutta Madrasa (founded in 1781), the Sanskrit College in
Benares (founded in 1 792) , and Delhi College, whichhad origin-
ated as a madrasa during Aurangzeb's reign. Although the
focus in all these schools was on "Oriental" learning, Delhi
College also taught its students Western sciences and mathe-
matics through works translated from English into Urdu. In
addition, Lord Welleslev, Governor-General from 1798 to
1805, established the College of Fort William in Calcutta in
1 800 to teach young British recruits to the Company Indian
^>
chl.044 10/12/2004 4:11 PM Page 1(
16 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
languages and Hindu and Muslim law, as well as Western sub-
jects, before sending them out into the countryside as adminis-
trators. Less well known is the College at Fort St. George,
Madras, founded in 1812 by Francis Ellis, "which trained the
British in Indian languages and Indians in Hindu and Muslim
law simultaneously (Cohn, 1996: 47—53).
When this Orientalist approach gave wav, from the 1820s,
to the supporters of "reform" and "liberalism," the purpose of
education became to instil British values. In 1835 Macaulav
wrote in his policv statement or "Minute on Education" that the
goal of British education in India should be to create a class of
Indians who would be "English in taste, in opinions, in morals
and in intellect." If this meant that down the road they would
also "want self-rule — as he thought thev must — this was to be
"welcomed, for the new political order would be one that
represented "an imperishable empire of our arts and our
morals, our literature and our laws" (Metcalf and Metcalf,
\7" 2002: 81). In anv event, this was a distant prospect, not —kzj~
something that British policv makers needed to worrv about
there and then.
The immediate consequences of Macaulav's educational
blueprint included, in 1835, the substitution of English for
Persian as the language of government. Under the reform-
minded Governor- General , Lord Bentinck (182 8—3 5 ) , several
colleges were founded, though no effort was made to set up
elementary schools. In Britain at this time, schools were run bv
parochial (religious) bodies, not by government. Among the
universities that date to this period are Patna College.
Elphinstone College was founded in the 1820s in Bombav.
Hindu College in Calcutta had been established in 1819, with
private British and Indian financial support. Bv the 1830s
English was being avidlv studied by "several thousand Indians"
in Calcutta alone (Metcalf and Metcalf, 2002: 82). The first
three Indian universities were inaugurated in 1 857.
^>
chl.044 10/12/2004 4:11 PM Page iy
EIGHTEENTH- AND NINETEENTH-CENTURY BACKGROUND 17
This embrace of Western learning was but an aspect of a
wider reform movement under Raja Ram Mohan Rov, founder
of the Brahmo Samaj in Calcutta, who sought to reform the
Hinduism of his dav in the light of a perceived golden age
accessed through the studv of ancient Sanskrit texts. That
earlier form of Hinduism, for Rov, was characterized bv
rationalism and simplicity rather than the idol worship of con-
temporary times. David Kopf has characterized this era as the
"Bengal Renaissance" on account of its spirit of enquirv and its
openness to reinterpretation of received tradition (Kopf,
1969).
"0" -&
^>
chl.044 10/12/2004 4:11 PM Page 18
O
"&
O
ch2.044 10/12/2004 5:11 PM Page
1^
THE MUSLIM RESPONSE
!
Indians of all religions were keenly aware of Western criti-
cisms of their religious customs and traditions. The Hindu
reformer Raja Ram Mohan Rov had responded bv rejecting
many aspects of contemporary ritual practice, arguing that the
"pure" Hinduism of India's "golden age" 'was rational, simple,
and devoid of practices which the British described as barbaric
(such as idol worship, caste, widow immolation, child mar-
riage, and other social practices deemed detrimental to
■women). He also considered certain Sanskritic texts authorita-
tive, and advocated their studv as a means of reforming reli-
gious and social practices.
In the Muslim case, religious leaders in the eighteenth and
nineteenth centuries promoted internal reform as a response to
Britain's rule of India. They reasoned that if Muslims had lost
political power after so many centuries of rule, it "was because thev
had been religiouslv negligent. Had thev been "good" Muslims,
they "would have been strong and the British would never have
been able to take over. Specificallv, Muslim reformers advocated
greater individual adherence to religious precepts as set out in the
shari'a, greater knowledge of the religious texts by the 'ulama and,
to some degree, by ordinary believers, and a focus on the
Prophet as a model of behavior in one's daily life. A related con-
cern was with preaching (dawa), mainlv to other Muslims, to
encourage greater religiositv. Their attitudes toward two other
19
^>
ch2.044 10/12/2004 5:11 PM Page 2(
20 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
questions — sufism (Islamic mysticism) and British rule — varied
widely. On both issues we find everything from complete
acceptance to total rejection.
The reformers' emphasis on authoritative texts, namely, the
Qur'an which Muslims regard as the literal word of God, and
secondarily the traditions of the Prophet (hadith), led to the
first translations of the Qur'an. The Qur'an is learned and
memorized in the original Arabic, but in India Muslims spoke
Persian in the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, or
Urdu starting in the mid-nineteenth centurv, or a regional
Indian language such as Bengali or Tamil. Because Arabic was
not spoken by Indian Muslims, the Qur'an "was poorly under-
stood. Muslim reformers in the late eighteenth and nineteenth
centuries translated the Qur'an into Persian, and much later
into Urdu and other Indian languages.
The Indian reform movements also highlighted the hadith lit-
erature. The hadith are narratives (literally, stories or news
\7" reports) about the Prophet (d. 632), relating to something he —kzj~
did or said, or which tell about his appearance, comportment,
and so on. These narratives "were orally transmitted by his fol-
lowers to successive generations of Muslims before being writ-
ten down about a centurv after his death. A laborious process of
evaluation over two centuries eventually resulted in six collec-
tions of hadiths, named after the jurists who had collected them.
The collection regarded as the most reliable is that of al-Bukhari
(d. 870), with that of Muslim (d. 875) the next most reliable.
The focus of the hadith literature is the Prophet, and all the
Indian Muslim reform movements of the eighteenth and nine-
teenth centuries were united in their strong emphasis on the
personality and biography of the Prophet. They saw in him a
model for how they could, and should, live their own lives. This
made him an example one could hope to emulate. Together
with the Qur'an becoming a subject of scholarly discussion and
interpretation, the view of the Prophet as a model Muslim
^>
ch2.044 10/12/2004 5:11 PM Page 21
THE MUSLIM RESPONSE 21
meant that the 'ulama, and through their leadership other
Muslims, were individually responsible for fulfilling their reli-
gious obligations as Muslims and reiving much less than before
on intermediaries and socially accepted, customarv wavs of
behavior. This characteristic unites all the reform movements,
despite their great diversity in other ways.
While the political dominance of the British in India, and their
debates about the intrinsic value or lack thereof of "Oriental"
learning, were a powerful impetus for reform among Indian
Muslims, there was also another source which came from the
Islamic world itself, namelv, the Wahhabi movement in eight-
eenth- and nineteenth-century Arabia. The influence of this
movement on Indian reform movements "was felt through the
annual pilgrimage to Mecca, through extensive periods of
study bv a small number of Indian Muslims at Mecca and
Medina, and bv the general improvement in communications
which occurred in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.
\7" The founder of the Wahhabi movement was Muhammad ibn —kzj~
'Abd al-Wahhab (1703—87). His message 'was an insistence on
the unity of God (tawhid), which meant that all forms of super-
stition (the veneration of saints' tombs, holy objects, and the
like) "were contrary to the worship of the one God. He believed
that the first generation of Muslims, namelv, the Prophet and
his companions, were the models of true Islamic practice. He
therefore rejected later developments in the history of Islam,
particularly sufism and what he viewed as its excesses. Albert
Hourani (1983: 37) describes his ideas as follows:
The true Islam, stated Ibn 'Abd al-Wahhab, was that of the
first generation, the pious forerunners, and in their name he
protested against all those later innovations which had in fact
brought other gods into Islam: against the later development
of mystical thought, with its monist doctrines, its ascetic
renunciation of the goods of the world, its organization into
brotherhoods, its rituals other than those prescribed by the
^>
ch2.044 10/12/2004 5:11 PM Page 22
22 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
Quran; against the excessive cult of Muhammad as perfect
man and intercessor with God (although great reverence was
paid to him as Prophet) ; against the worship of saints and
reverence for their shrines; and against the return into Islam
of the customs and practices of the [pre-Islamic age].
Although the precise influence of Ibn 'Abel al-Wahhab on
Indian Muslim reformers of the eighteenth and nineteenth
centuries is a matter of scholarly debate, there is no doubt that
his ideas were well known and that thev plaved a major role in
the thought of some religious thinkers in India.
SHAHWALI ULLAH
In the eighteenth century, the figure of ShahWali Ullah Dehlawi
(1703—62) stands out as preeminent. The progressive collapse
of central authority in Delhi caused him to plead with Muslim
\7" leaders in Rohilkhand and in south India to do something to ~X7~
restore order. In his anxiety to see a strong Muslim ruler, Shah
Wali Ullah even invited Ahmad Shah Abdali of Afghanistan to
invade and take over. He must have been pleased with the out-
come of the Battle ofPanipatin 1761 , which resulted in Ahmad
Shah's victory over the Marathas and held out the hope of stable
central government from Delhi. But he died the next vear, and
as we know, that battle did nothing to settle the question of cen-
tral rule as Abdali returned to Afghanistan, leaving a power vac-
uum in his wake .
However, ShahWali Ullah is remembered chieflv for his con-
tribution to religious rather than political matters. His father,
Shaikh 'Abd ur-Rahim (1644 — 1718), had established a sem-
inary or madrasa, the Madrasa-i Rahimivva, in Delhi, and this
was "where he spent his lifetime — as director of the school, as
teacher, and as thinker and writer. His chief contribution to
Islamic studies was to insist on the importance of the studv of
^>
ch2.044 10/12/2004 5:11 PM Page 21;
THE MUSLIM RESPONSE 23
hadith (pronounced hadis in Urdu), the traditions of the
Prophet, and to argue that the 'ulamahad an obligation to study
the original sources (the Qur'an and hadith) and draw on all
four Sunni schools of law (madhhab, pi. tnadhahib) eclecticallv
to make legal judgments.
The four Sunni law schools ( Shi 'i Muslims have three of their
own) came into being around the late tenth century. Named
after their founders, thev are geographically based, such that
different parts of the Muslim world have come over time to be
associated with one or other of the four. In India, the predom-
inant school is the Hanafi, named after Abu Hanifa of Iraq
(d. 767) .The schools are distinguished bv minor differences of
judgment between them. In this book, for example, we will see
the case of a scholar combining the judgments of two different
schools of law in a case relating to apostasv and marriage.
However, most Indian Muslim scholars (including Ahmad
Riza), frowned upon such practice.
\7" The founding of the four law schools had the general effect —kzj~
of making it unnecessary for jurists to go directlv to the sources
(the Qur'an and the prophetic traditions), allowing them
to relv instead on the judgments of the founding jurists on
major issues. Muslim scholars metaphorically refer to this
development as the "closing of the gate of ijtihad," or inde-
pendent reasoning. Thus, once the medieval jurists had
judged something to be forbidden or permitted, based on the
guidance of the Qur'an and prophetic traditions, all that later
generations of scholars had to do was to follow in their
footsteps. Thev no longer had to consult the original sources
themselves.
But while this was generally the case, in fact independent
reasoning never ceased as new issues constantly arose, needing
fresh interpretation and judgment by the 'ulama. Shah Wali
Ullah contributed to Islamic reform in eighteenth-century
India by reminding the Indian 'ulama of their obligation to
^>
ch2.044 10/12/2004 5:11 PM Page 24
24 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
make legal judgments in light of the original sources, choosing
between the judgments of the four schools when thev
deemed this to be necessary, rather than following the one that
was customary in their part of the world. "His espousal of
jurisprudential eclecticism combined with consultation of
Qur'an and hadis clearlv enhanced the responsibility of the
'ulama for interpreting the Law to their followers" (Metcalf,
1982: 38). It is important to note, however, that this obliga-
tion was limited to the learned, the khawass, to the exclusion
of the ordinary ( 'amm) believer. Most Muslims, including
most 'ulama, were urged to follow Hanafi law exclusively; only
a few were encouraged to engage in ijtihad along the lines
indicated.
In Islamic terms, the study of hadith is part of the branch of
studv known as manqulat, or the traditional sciences (from the
Arabic root nql, to transmit, hand down), in contrast with the
ma 'qulat or the "rational" sciences (cf. Arabic 'aql, meaning rea-
\7" son, rationality) which include subjects such as philosophy. —kzj~
ShahWali Ullah's espousal of the traditional sciences stands in
contrast to other schools of religious scholars (including
Ahmad Riza Khan) to be discussed shortly. In his view, the
rational sciences were a source of confusion and should be
avoided. The study of hadith, on the other hand, "would bring
Muslims closer to the sources of their tradition and thereby
strengthen and unite the communitv. Likewise, he encouraged
the 'ulama to studv the Qur'an directly as "well, and to this
end he translated it from Arabic into Persian. At the time, this
"was an act of great courage which elicited much criticism from
the 'ulama.
Shah Wali Ullah is also known for his contributions to a
major issue in sufism, namely, the theory of the unity of being
(wahdat al-wujud) versus the unity of witness (wahdat
al-shuhud) . This debate had been ongoing among sufis in India
since the seventeenth century. The wujudi position is identified
^>
ch2.044 10/12/2004 5:11 PM Page 2
^
THE MUSLIM RESPONSE 25
with Ibn al-'Arabi (d.1240), the famous Andalusian sufi of the
thirteenth centurv. Ibn al-'Arabi had argued that creation has
no empirical existence in and of itself, that it is but an aspect of
God Himself. It follows logically from this position
that human beings themselves are but an emanation of God, not
independent of Him. Critics of this theory, of "which there "were
many, argued that this position denies tawhid, the Oneness of
God, for it makes humans the partners of God. Shah Wali
Ullah's view on this subject was to argue that the two positions
were less at variance with one another than is commonlv
j
believed. "The whole universe is pervaded by a common exist-
ence, he argued, an existence both immanent and transcen-
dent, but bevond that existence is the Original Existence of
God" (Metcalf, 1982: 40). However, Shah Wali Ullah believed
that the subject was too subtle to be discussed publiclv, and he
urged caution in the matter. According to Metcalf, his espousal
of the wujudi position led to its wide acceptance bv later gener-
\7" ations of Indian sufis. —kzj~
Shah Wali Ullah also sought to reconcile Sunni and Shi'i
Muslims, at a time of increased Shi'a influence in the regional
courts at Awadh and Bengal. He venerated ' Ali, as did the Shi'i,
but held that the first two caliphates (those of Abu Bakr and
'Umar) were superior to the last two (those of 'Uthman and
'Ali), because the Muslims had been politicallv united during
their rule. Although this attempt at bridge -building was not
verv successful, Shah Wali Ullah's achievements in other
respects — his emphasis on hadith studies, his scholarlv
output as an 'alim, and his high attainments as a sufi — were
remarkable. Particularly important was his role in renewal of
the law, as demonstrated bv his emphasis on ijtihad. In the fol-
lowing centurv, his work was continued bv his four sons, espe-
cially Shah 'Abd ul-Aziz, whom the Ahl-e Sunnat regarded as
the Renewer of the thirteenth Islamic centurv.
^>
ch2.044 10/12/2004 5:11 PM Page 2{
26 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
FARANGI MAH ALL: TRAINING EMPLOYEES
FORTHE MUSLIM STATES
While Shah Wali Ullah taught and wrote from his Madrasa-i
Rahimivva in Delhi, another group of Sunni 'ulama, known as
the Farangi Mahallis, were making their mark in Lucknow at
the same time. Their residence in Lucknow began when, in
1 695 , Emperor Aurangzeb granted the four sons of Mulla Qutb
ud-Din (d. 1692) the house of a European merchant (hence the
name "Farangi Mahall," or foreigner's house) in recompense for
their father's murder and loss of the family's library to arson. In
the eighteenth century the third son, Mulla Nizam ud-Din,
devised a new madrasa curriculum which came to be known as
the Dars-i Nizami. Madrasas all over India gradually adopted
this syllabus. The madrasa at Farangi Mahall became a center
for learning on a par with the Madrasa-i Rahimiyya.
Unlike the latter, the Farangi Mahall madrasa focused on
r~) ma 'qulat or rational studies. Francis Robinson, who has made — (-~\-
an exhaustive study of the Farangi Mahall 'ulama, shows in
detail the differences between the curricula followed by the
two madrasas. Where the Madrasa-i Rahimivva emphasized
hadith, the Farangi Mahall curriculum emphasized grammar,
logic, and philosophy (Robinson, 2001: 46— S3). The Farangi
Mahall 'ulama believed that knowledge of these sciences was
"crucial to the studv of legal theory and jurisprudence (usul
al-Jiqh) and of theology ('ilm al-kalam), and expertise in them
helped make many ... other disciplines accessible" (Zaman,
2002: 76). They also de-emphasized the study of sufism.The
reason, Robinson explains, was that the 'ulama at Farangi
Mahall were seeking to train future
lawyers, judges and administrators . . . [whose] skills were in
demand from the increasingly sophisticated and complex
bureaucratic systems of seventeenth- and eighteenth-century
India. . . . The emphasis of the [curriculum] on training
^>
ch2.044 10/12/2004 5:11 PM Page 21r
THE MUSLIM RESPONSE 27
capable administrators for Muslim states rather than
specialists in "religion" per se may explain the dropping
of mysticism from the course. Knowledge of Sufism was
not what trainee administrators wanted. (Robinson,
2001:53)
In practice, the curriculum was flexible within the overall
framework initially set out bv Mulla Nizam ud-Din. Zaman
writes,
Onlv in the latter half of the nineteenth century, and . . .
possibly in response to a certain measure of influence
exercised by Western styles and institutions of education in
British India, did the Dars-i Nizami acquire a more or less
standardized form that was widely adopted as a "curriculum"
by madrasas of the Indian subcontinent. Madrasas have
continued, however, to differ in their versions of this
curriculum, which has scarcely been impervious to change
~\_y~ even after its standardization in the late nineteenth century. K^J
(Zaman, 2002:68)
The point that the curriculum of the Dars-i Nizami was more
rather than less flexible before British influence made itself felt is
interesting and "worth noting. (It also accords with what histor-
ians know of a host of other Indian institutions, such as caste
itself, which became relatively "fixed" and inflexible in practice
in the later nineteenth century.)
However, if the purpose of the Dars-i Nizami was to train
Muslim bureaucrats to work in the Indian Muslim states in the
late eighteenth century, the political instability of the Muslim
successor states made the princes rather undependable as
patrons for prospective qadis (judges in Islamic law courts) or
muftis ('ulama qualified to issue fatawa [sing, fatwa], juridical
responses). The same may be said for those whose skills lay in
writing poetry, in the musical arts, or even in the military, for
^>
ch2.044 10/12/2004 5:11 PM Page 2£
28 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
that matter. Metcalf writes as follows about the difficulties
Farangi Mahallis encountered at this time:
Wherever there was a prince, the Farangi Mahallis sought
positions under him. Thus in the mid-eighteenth century . . .
three members of the family joined princely armies. The
travels, the varieties of employment, the violent deaths of at
least one member in each of the first four generations of the
family — all this suggests the difficulties facing the family in
maintaining the pattern of dependence on princes. (Metcalf,
1982:32)
NINETEENTH-CENTURY REFORM
MOVEMENTS
The nineteenth -century reformists, of which there were many
\7" groups, shared in the broad set of goals indicated earlier, "\7
namely, better knowledge of the textual sources of Islam
(mainly through the creation of new seminaries for the training
of scholars), greater adherence to religious precepts by indi-
vidual believers, and a close modeling of their lives on that of
the Prophet. However, thev differed in significant ways. Based
on their attitude toward British rule, we can distinguish three
broad groups: the vast majority (Shah 'Abd ul-'Aziz, the
Deobandis, the Ahl-e Hadith, the Nadwat al-'Ulama, the
Ahmadis) were relatively uninterested in participating in the
opportunities being opened up by British rule, although most
of them accepted it without active protest. Of this group, the
Ahl-e Hadith were the least accommodating toward the British
while the Nadwa and the Ahmadis were the most so. The
jihadists (Savvid Ahmad Barelwi and his followers), on the
other hand, were actively opposed not onlv to British rule but
to all forms of non-Muslim rule. Thev sought to restore Muslim
^>
ch2.044 10/12/2004 5:11 PM Page 2i
THE MUSLIM RESPONSE 29
rule through political means, fighing the Sikhs in the Panjab,
and the British in northwest India generally. The Faraizi move-
ment in Bengal falls in between the two, in that although the
Faraizis did not declare a jihad against the British, they boy-
cotted British-run institutions and refused to pav land taxes.
Finally, the accommodationists (Sayyid Ahmad Khan)
embraced British rule as a positive good from which Indian
Muslims stood to benefit.
Ahmad Riza belongs to the first group, though his story is
not addressed until the following chapter.
Shah'Abdul-'Aziz
After ShahWali Ullah's death in 1762, his eldest son Shah'Abd
ul-'Aziz (d. 1 824) took over the management of the Madrasa-i
Rahimiyya. Shah 'Abd ul-'Aziz followed in the footsteps of his
illustrious father bv studving and promoting hadith scholar-
ly ship, but "widened the circle of those he addressed through the —kzj~
number of fatawahe wrote for individual Muslims who sought
his advice. The subject matter of the fatawa ranged widely from
details regarding the proper way to perform the ritual praver to
relations with Shi'i Muslims, and to whether it was legitimate
to seek emplovment under the British. The increased import-
ance of fatwa writing was a direct result of the loss of political
power bv Muslims, which led to a greater need for personal
guidance bv the 'ulama, now that thev no longer had state-
based shari'a courts.
One fatwa bv Shah 'Abd ul- 'Aziz has been particularly com-
mented upon bv later historians on account of its political
implications. In 1 803, he "was asked whether it was permissible
for a Muslim to give and take interest under British rule. The
date is important, for Delhi had been occupied bv the East India
Company that year. Would he take foreign occupation and the
suspension of religious law in parts of the countrv to mean that
^>
ch2.044 10/12/2004 5:11 PM Page 3(
30 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
the normal rules of conduct in other spheres of Muslim life no
longer applied either? His answer to this question was equivo-
cal. In a land ruled bv Muslims (termed dar ul-lslam in Islamic
law), interest (sud, or, in Arabic, riba) is prohibited. However,
in the troubled circumstances of the early nineteenth century,
many Muslims had fallen on hard times and "were deeply in
debt. If Shah 'Abd ul-'Aziz were to judge on the basis of the
Islamic sources of law (Qur'an, hadith, and the principles of
analogy [^jjus], and community consensus or ijma) that the
legal status of British-controlled territorv had changed (or, in
Islamic terms, that it was dar ul-harb rather than dar ul-lslam),
the prohibition on taking and receiving interest could be tem-
porarily suspended.
Shah 'Abd ul- 'Aziz's response to the question was that in
Delhi at that time, "the Imam al-Muslimin [the leader of the
Muslims, perhaps a reference to the Mughal emperor] wields
no authority, while the decrees of the Christian leaders are
\7" obeyed without fear [of retribution] .... From here to Calcutta —kzj~
the Christians are in complete control" (Metcalf, 1 982 : 46 ; my
interpolation in square brackets) .While he did not directly say
that the legal status of Delhi had changed from the abode of
Islam to that of "war, he implied that it had, so that he could be
understood as tacitly permitting the questioner to engage in
interest-bearing transactions without incurring sin (Mushir
ul-Haqq, 1969). Or, to put it another wav," 'Abdu'l- 'Aziz thus
appears to have wanted Muslims to behave politically as if the
situation were daru'l-islam, for he gave no call to military
action [against the British], vet he wanted them to recognize
that the organization of the state was no longer in Muslim
hands" (Metcalf, 1982:51).
This fatwa is particularly interesting because of the "way it
has been interpreted bv Muslims in the twentieth century. It
has been read — bv Muslim nationalists as well as Muslim
nationalist historians — as an endorsement of jihad (holy "war)
^>
ch2.044 10/12/2004 5:11 PM Page 31
THE MUSLIM RESPONSE 31
against the British. Their reasoning is that if it was no longer a
sin to take on interest-bearing debt, it could onlv mean that the
country was under non-Muslim rule, which in turn meant that
holv war was justified against it. However, Metcalf suggests that
Shah 'Abd ul-'Aziz may even have opposed the jihad that was
launched shortly before his death. At anv rate, he is known to
have encouraged his nephew and son-in-law 'Abd ul-Hayy to
accept a job offered to him by the East India Companv — further
evidence, it would seem, that he did not endorse jihad.
However that mav be, a jihad movement "was launched in 1830
by Savvid Ahmad of Rae Bareli (a town in Awadh) . To him we
may now turn.
Sayyid Ahmad Barelwi
Savvid Ahmad Barelwi (not to be confused with Ahmad Riza
Khan Barelwi, the subject of this book) was born in 1786 to a
\7" family that claimed descent from the Prophet Muhammad. —kzj~
Among Muslims, such families (known by the title "Sayyids")
enjoy high status by virtue of their ancestry. He traveled as a
voung man from his hometown to Lucknow in search of 'work,
and then to Delhi, where he studied under Shah 'Abd ul-Qadir
(Shah 'Abd ul- 'Aziz's brother) of the Madrasa-i Rahimivva
from 1805 to 1811 .Thereafter he left for central India, where
he served as a cavalryman for one Amir Khan "who worked for
the Marathas. In 1818, this Amir Khan was "forced to come to
terms with the British who [awarded] him the principality of
Tonk and stvled him a nawwab" (Metcalf, 1982: 54) .
Savvid Ahmad then returned to Delhi the second time, now
as a religious reformer determined to bring about greater
observance of the shari'a. Some prominent younger members
of the Shah Wali Ullah family accepted him as their spiritual
leader (sufi shaikh). His ideas are set out in two influential
books bv his close associate Muhammad Isma'il (d. 1831).
^>
ch2.044 10/12/2004 5:11 PM Page 32
32 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
Entitled Taqwiyat al-lman (Strengthening the Faith) and Sirat
al-Mustaqim (The Straight Path), the first was published in
Persian, but soon translated into Urdu, while the second was
actually written in Urdu. The central theme of the Taqwiyat
al-lman is the claim that the Muslims of the time had deviated
from the principle of tawhid, strict monotheism, bv a number
of objectionable practices representing a form of: shirk (associa-
tionism or polytheism, the opposite of tawhid). He divides
them into three main groups, associating some with God's
knowledge (ishrakji'l 'ilm), others with God's power (ishrakji'l
tasarruf), and others with God's worship (ishrakji'l 'ibada),
giving examples illustrating each type. Thus, belief in inter-
cession is cited as an example of association of others with
God's power. A host of popular practices, such as prostration
before a tomb, going on pilgrimage to a holv person's tomb and
making food offerings in honor of the deceased, and the like are
cited as examples of the third kind of shirk. However, Sayvid
\7" Ahmad did not condemn sufism per se, onlv its perceived —kzj~
excesses. In addition, he also promoted practices which he
deemed Islamic, such as the remarriage of widows (the upper-
caste Hindu prohibition on the remarriage of widows had no
scriptural sanction in the Qur'an). He even helped to bring
about the remarriage of women he knew.
The second phase of Savvid Ahmad's career was overtlv
political, for he decided in the earlv 1820s to wage a jihad
against the new non-Muslim rulers of India (first the Sikhs in
Panjab, then the British). He and his associates planned for it
carefullv. First Savvid Ahmad went on the pilgrimage to Mecca,
gathering followers along the way from his hometown in Rae
Bareli to Calcutta, where a number of them boarded a ship for
the long journey. After his arrival in Arabia, he had his follow-
ers swear to follow him in the jihad to come. The model in these
and other activities was the Prophet, who had led his followers
to victory against the pagan Meccans from their base in Medina
^>
ch2.044 10/12/2004 5:11 PM Page 31;
THE MUSLIM RESPONSE 33
many centuries before. The oath of lovaltv had a double
significance: at once a spiritual tie between master and disciple
(and a promise to abide by certain principles of behavior
which distinguished the devotee from the larger society
around him), it was also a political act, presaging the coming
jihad. His followers regarded him as the mujaddid (Renewer)
of the new (thirteenth) Islamic century. As we shall see in
subsequent chapters, the Ahl-e Sunnat movement disputed
this claim.
After his return to India in 1823, Savvid Ahmad toured
the north for two years, organizing and making preparations.
He proceeded in a westerly direction, intending to wage
jihad from what is today Afghanistan. The shari'a stipulates
(following the Prophet's example) that jihad be waged from a
Muslim-ruled territorv adjacent to a non-Muslim one.
Accordinglv, the target of the jihad movement "was the Panjab,
then ruled by the Sikh leader Ranjit Singh rather than the
\7" British. In 1831, after a series of military successes, Savvid —kzj~
Ahmad was killed along with six hundred others as a result of
skirmishes with local Afghans who resented the reforms
(and taxes) sought to be imposed on them. Leaderless, the
movement lingered on for many years in northwestern India
but finallv petered out in the 1 860s.
Th e Fa ra 'i zi Movetn ent
A very different Islamic reform movement, that of the Fara'izis
in Bengal, unfolded during the 1 820s through to the 1 860s. The
name derives from the word Jarz ( Arabic fard; pluraljara'iz or
Jara'id), or duties of Islam. The leader of this movement
was Haji Shari'at Ullah (d. 1840), who returned to Bengal in
1821 after living in the Hijaz in western Arabia for many
vears. Dismaved by what he saw as the laxitv of practice
^>
ch2.044 10/12/2004 5:11 PM Page 34
34 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
among Bengali weavers and peasants, he preached renewed
commitment to the duties of Islam (daily prayer, the Ramadan
fast, and the pilgrimage, among other things). Shari'at Ullah
also believed that sufism should be limited to the few, for its
esoteric teachings were likelv to be misunderstood bv ordinary
believers. His teachings have been compared to those of the
Wahhabis, whose ideas were familiar to Shari'at Ullah from his
long stay in Arabia.
Rural Bengal at this time was in the midst of a severe eco-
nomic depression brought about bv the Permanent Settlement
of 1793, which changed landholding patterns and rendered
many peasants landless. The introduction of British factory-
made cloth at low prices was also driving Indian weavers out of
business and forcing them on to the land. These circumstances
help us understand the anti-British aspects of the movement,
for Shari'at Ullah ruled that in the absence of functioning qazis
and given the non-implementation of shari'a law, Bengal was
\7" dar ul-harb (as some interpreted Delhi to have become after its ~x3~
occupation bv the British in 1 803) , and that the congregational
noontime prayer on Fridays was therefore not permissible. For
him the suspension of religious law in lands under British con-
trol meant that the normal rules of conduct in other spheres of
life no longer applied either. Under the leadership of his son,
Dudhu Miyan, Fara'izis were urged to refuse to pay British land
taxes. They also boycotted the British courts, settling their dif-
ferences themselves. The movement "was highly successful in
forging a sense of unitv and self-help among poor Bengali
Muslims for a while. However, British reprisals, and the lack of
strong leadership after Dudhu Mivan's death in the 1 860s led to
the movement's decline (Metcalf, 1982: 68— 70; Ahmad Khan,
196S).
^>
ch2.044 10/12/2004 5:11 PM Page 3
^
THE MUSLIM RESPONSE 35
The Deobandi 'Ulama
In 1867, a new seminary (madrasa) called the Dar al-'Ulum
was founded in the small town of Deoband, about eightv miles
north of Delhi. It was a new kind of madrasa:
Its founders, emulating the British bureaucratic style for
educational institutions, . . . acquired classrooms and a central
library. It was run by a professional staff, and its students
were admitted for a fixed course of study and required to take
examinations for which prizes were awarded at a yearly
convocation. Gradually an informal system of affiliated
colleges emerged. . . .The school was, in fact, so unusual that
the annual printed report, itself an innovation, made
continuing efforts to explain the organization of the novel
system. (Metcalf, 1982: 93-94)
While this mav sound fairlv unremarkable to the modern
reader, it has to be seen in the context of madrasa education at
-(^y— the time. Traditional madrasas consisted of a building attached — t^y-
to a mosque. The students did not have separate classrooms or
libraries, and thev studied individual texts taught one-to-one,
or in a small group, by a single teacher. The texts taught
depended on the capacity of the student. When the student had
mastered the texts, he received a certificate (sanad) from his
teacher and could go on to study more advanced books if he so
wished from the same or a different teacher. There were no
examinations.
The funding of the madrasa at Deoband was different as
well. It was financed by private contributions from the resi-
dents of Deoband and other well-wishers, not bv an endow-
ment (waqf), as was customary. Nor "was it supported by the
patronage of princely courts (as was the Madrasa-i 'Aliyya at
Rampur, for instance) .
Intellectually, the 'ulama at Deoband had much the same
perspective as the Madrasa-i Rahimiyva in Delhi and Shah ' Abd
^>
ch2.044 10/12/2004 5:11 PM Page 3(
36 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
ul-'Aziz(d. 1824). Two 'ulama who were central to the school's
founding and early years were Maulanas Muhammad Qasim
Nanautawi (1833-79) andRashid Ahmad Gangohi (1829-1905).
Muhammad Qasim 's family had a long-standing relationship
with the 'ulama of Delhi, as did Rashid Ahmad's. Both were of
the reformist tradition; they were critical of the rituals cus-
tomarily performed at saints' tombs, lavish weddings and
feasts, and the payment of interest on loans, for instance. They
were also ambivalent about rituals associated with the death
anniversaries ('urs) of sufi saints, discouraging but not com-
pletely condemning them. On the other hand, they "were punc-
tilious about observing the ritual obligations of prayer, fasting,
and performance of the pilgrimage. They also sought to
encourage widow remarriage. "The follower was expected to
abandon suspect customs, to fulfill all religious obligations, and
to submit himself to guidance in all aspects of life" (Metcalf,
1982:76-79,151).
\7" The fact that the Deobandis were reformist does not mean —kzj~
that they were opposed to sufism — on the contrary, both Qasim
Nanautawi and Rashid Ahmad were disciples of the famous Haji
Imdadullah — but it did mean that they disapproved of what
they considered sufi excesses. The curriculum thev taught
sought to be comprehensive: they "taught all the Islamic sci-
ences and . . . represented] all the Sufi orders. Thev said that in
this they followed Shah Walivu'llah. [However, unlike him,
thev] emphasized reform of custom, not intellectual synthesis"
(Metcalf, 1982:140).
For the Deobandi 'ulama, as for those of the Ahl-e Sunnat
movement, the writing of fatawa was an important means of
disseminating the message. Although the subjects of these legal
judgments varied widely, for the most part they steered clear of
politics. Thev addressed questions related to sufism, the proper
performance of ritual prayer, fasting, pilgrimage, and relations
with other groups, both Muslim and non-Muslim.
^>
ch2.044 10/12/2004 5:11 PM Page 3y
THE MUSLIM RESPONSE 37
Zaman adds to the picture painted by Metcalf bv giving an
interesting example of the approach to problems thrown up bv
British rule in the late nineteenth and early twentieth cen-
turies, such as the lack of qadis (judges of Islamic law) in British
Indian courts. The judgments of the 'ulama were not enforce-
able in court. For instance, without a qadi it now became
impossible to have marriages annulled. As a result, women
began to declare themselves apostates from Islam, since apos-
tasv automatically terminated a marriage. In the 1930s,
Maulana Ashraf 'Ali Thanawi (d. 1943), a famous Deobandi
scholar ( 'alim) , tried to solve this problem bv arguing that apos-
tasy had no effect on the marriage contract, 'while at the same
time proposing both that the conditions under which mar-
riages could be dissolved should be made less stringent and that
in the absence of a qadi, 'ulama or other "righteous Muslims"
acting together could dissolve a marriage in his stead. These
ideas were accepted bv the political partv, Jamiyvat al-'Ulama-e
\7" Hind, which had been founded after WorldWar I and which was ~x3~
dominated bv Deobandi 'ulama, and it became the basis for the
Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act of 1939 in British India.
As Zaman points out, however, although this solved the prob-
lem related to apostasv and made it easier to dissolve a bad mar-
riage, it put no pressure on the British to appoint qadis in
British Indian courts.
The Ahl-e Hadith
The movement known as the Ahl-e Hadith ("people of the
[prophetic] hadith") derives from the fact that the 'ulama in this
group advocated reliance on the Qur'an and hadith for
guidance on matters of ritual and behavior. They denied the
legitimacy of the four Sunni law schools (Hanafi, Shafi'i,
Hanbali, and Maliki) that had emerged within some three hun-
dred years of the death of the Prophet and which had long
^>
ch2.044 10/12/2004 5:11 PM Page 3£
38 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
reached so dominant a position that one could not be a Sunni
without affiliation to one of them. Their rejection of the judg-
ments of the law schools and insistence that each believer
decide on an issue for him- or herself based on what the Qur ' an
and hadith have to say about it presupposed a high level of liter-
acy and familiarity with Arabic which the 'ulama were normally
the only ones to possess; this made it highlv elitist. This was a
reflection, perhaps, of their class status, for the leadership of
the Ahl-e Hadith belonged to the well-born, people who had
been employed by the Mughal court but had since fallen on
hard times.
Two additional features distinguished the Ahl-e Hadith from
other Sunni Muslims. The first was a ritual matter: thev favored
a certain manner of prayer that set them apart from everyone
else. The second was more important, namelv that thev con-
demned all forms of sufism, not just specific aspects of sufi
practice after the fashion of the Deobandis.Thev opposed the
\7" veneration of saints and pilgrimages to their tombs. In fact, —kzj~
they also opposed the practice of visiting the Prophet's tomb in
Medina. Because of this and their condemnation of the four law
schools, many Muslims compared them to the Wahhabis of
Arabia. Like the Arabian Wahhabis, they read and admired the
works of Ibn Taimivva (d. 1328), even translating his works
into Urdu.
The Ahl-e Hadith, however, claimed that they were intellec-
tual descendants of the eighteenth-centurv scholar Shah Wali
Ullah of Delhi. Shah Wali Ullah had, indeed, spoken of the
importance of hadith scholarship, and of the precedence of
hadith over the judgments of the law schools in cases of conflict
between them. And unlike the Ahl-e Hadith, who "denied the
legitimacv of ... the four major law schools" (Metcalf, 1982:
270), at least for the educated elite, the Wahhabis followed the
judgments of Hanbali scholars. Unlike Shah Wali Ullah,
who had been eclectic in his use of the legal tradition, the
^>
ch2.044 10/12/2004 5:11 PM Page 3i
THE MUSLIM RESPONSE 39
Ahl-e Hadith preferred a narrow interpretation of the Qur'an
andhadith.
Relations between the Ahl-e Hadith and the other Sunni
Muslim reform movements were tense, leading on several
occasions to lawsuits which the British were forced to
arbitrate. Their relations with the British were also uneasy.
The British suspected them of sedition until 1871 , when thev
concluded the so-called Wahhabi trials conducted against
the jihadists who had continued to fight the British in
Afghanistan and along the northwestern border, following
Savvid Ahmad Barelwi's lead. Thereafter relations between
them improved.
In terms of their theological positions on the Sunni law
schools and sufism, the Ahl-e Hadith was perhaps the furthest
from the Ahl-e Sunnat of all the movements considered
here.
TheNadwatal-'Ulama
The Nadwat al-'Ulama ("Council of 'Ulama," known as
Nadwa, for short) was founded in the 1 890s in the hope of
bringing Sunni and Shi'i 'ulama together on a single platform,
despite their differences of opinion. It was hoped that, thus
united, the Nadwa would be able to present to the British the
views of its members on issues thev cared about. Annual meet-
ings were planned at which all members would convene and
decide on future action. As originallv conceived, its member-
ship was to have consisted not onlv of Sunni and Shi'i 'ulama,
but also of wealthv and powerful patrons such as Muslim
"princes, government servants, traders, and lawvers" (Metcalf,
1982: 345). It was also conceived as an all-India bodv, not a
local one. It actively sought British recognition of its school, the
Dar al-'Ulum, founded in 1898. After some hesitation, the
British agreed to patronize secular learning at the school,
^>
ch2.044 10/12/2004 5:11 PM Page 4(
40 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
contributed land for the fine building subsequently built in
Lucknow, and in 1908 laid the foundation stone.
The school curriculum was a source of considerable debate
and discord from the verv outset. Some felt that English should
be taught alongside Arabic and other subjects since it would
allow the Nadwa to refute Western religion and culture all the
more effectivelv. Although two of its earlv leaders, Savvid
Muhammad 'Ali Mongiri and Maulana Shibli Numani, sup-
ported English as a subject, the 'ulama opposed it, and the idea
soon had to be given up. The opposition stemmed from fear
that in the long run the introduction of English would lead to
the secularization of the curriculum.
Another goal of the new school was madrasa reform. In
order to
infus[e] the ranks of the 'ulama with fresh vigor, and . . .
broaden the scope of their activities and their role in the
s~~\ Muslim community ... it was deemed imperative to reform s--\
the prevalent styles of learning. .. .The Nadwa 's proposed
curriculum sought to produce religious scholars capable of
providing guidance and leadership to the community in a
wide range of spheres: in law and theology, in adab (belles
lettres), in philosophy, and in "matters of the world." (Zaman,
2002: 69)
The founders hoped that all Indian madrasas would follow its
lead and adopt the curriculum that thev proposed to put
together. Thev wanted to impart a "useful" education — bv
which thev meant one that would create "a new generation of
'ulama fit to lead the Muslim communitv."The studv of "exe-
gesis [ofthe Qur'an],hadith,historv, and Arabic literature" was
to be emphasized, while that of logic and philosophv — the hall-
mark ofthe Dars-i Nizami svllabus thev were trving to reform
— was downplaved (Zaman, 2002: 71—72). If this sounds coun-
terintuitive, it has to be remembered that the Dars-i Nizami
^>
ch2.044 10/12/2004 5:11 PM Page 4:
THE MUSLIM RESPONSE 41
svllabus had been designed in the eighteenth century. The
Nadwa considered it outdated and in need of revision. Exegesis
of the Qur'an and hadith, on the other hand, required the stu-
dent to study the sources at first hand, while the studv of Arabic
literature and history were intended to broaden the student's
knowledge of the Arab world more generally.
In practice, it was hard to implement these changes, for the
authority of the 'ulama ultimately rested on their mastery of
the very texts that the Nadwa was trying to replace. (Indeed,
Zaman points out that the authority of these texts had, if any-
thing, increased during the colonial period.) The Nadwa's pro-
posal to do away not onlv with many of these texts, but also
with the discursive practices of the madrasa curriculum — in
other words, with the whole system by which religious author-
ity "was acquired and demonstrated — required the 'ulama to
distance themselves from their tradition of learning, rather
than embrace it. Another hurdle was the difficulty of getting
\7" the 'ulama to put aside their differences. The challenge —kzj~
the Nadwa thus took on was enormous, and in the end the
attempt failed.
The Nadwa continues to flourish today, but its curriculum
follows that of the Dars-i Nizami svllabus.
Sayyid Ahmad Khan and MAO College, Aligarh
Sayyid Ahmad Khan (d. 1898) "was not a religious scholar but
an official in the judicial department of the British Indian
government until his retirement in 1 877, and the college he
founded in 1 875 had a very different purpose from those dis-
cussed above. He is an important figure in the history of South
Asian nationalism, particularly in Pakistan, where he is seen as
the nineteenth-century "founder" of the idea of a separate
homeland for South Asian Muslims. When the Indian National
Congress was founded in 1885, Sayyid Ahmad spoke out
^>
ch2.044 10/12/2004 5:11 PM Page 41
42 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
against the idea of an Indian nation that might be democratic
when it became independent, as he believed this would be
detrimental to Muslim interests, and founded an organization
of his own, the Muhammadan Educational Congress (later
renamed the Muhammadan Educational Conference). Shortly
thereafter, the British honored him with a knighthood for his
services to the empire in the aftermath of the Revolt of 1857,
particularly the role he plaved in fostering mutual understand-
ing between the British and the Indian Muslim community, and
he became Sir Savvid.
Savvid Ahmad Khan was a rationalist. His reformist ideas
were in the tradition of Shah Wali Ullah, and were also similar
to those of Muhammad Isma'il, the author of the Taqwiyat
al-Iman, particularly in his disapproval of what he saw as accre-
tions to Islamic belief and practice and different forms of
associationism (shirk). He believed that Islam was a rational
religion, one that was in full accord with human nature:
I have determined the following principle for discerning the
truth of the religions, and also for testing the truth of Islam,
i.e. , is the religion in question in correspondence with human
nature or not, with the human nature that has been created
into man or exists in man. And I have become certain that
Islam is in correspondence with that nature. (Quoted in Troll,
1978:317)
And further:
I hold for certain that God has created us and sent us his
guidance. This guidance corresponds fully to our natural
constitution, to our nature. ... It would be highly irrational to
maintain that God's work [the natural world , including
humankind] and God's word [the revelation of the Qur'an]
are different and unrelated to one another. All beings,
including man, are God's work and religion is His word; the
two cannot be in conflict. ... So I formulated that "Islam is
nature and nature is Islam." (Quoted in Troll, 1 978: 317)
^>
ch2.044 10/12/2004 5:11 PM Page 4:
THE MUSLIM RESPONSE 43
This formulation led some 'ulama, the Ahl-e Sunnat among
them, to allege that Savvid Ahmad Khan worshiped nature
rather than God, an allegation he vehementlv denied.
In keeping with his modernist, rationalist thinking Savvid
Ahmad Khan denied the possibilitv of miracles, interpreting
the miracles surrounding the Prophet as later fabrications. He
also interpreted belief in angels metaphoricallv rather than lit
erallv, as a quality possessed by prophets. Thus, the angel
Gabriel "stands for the . . . inherent possession of prophethood
in the Prophet himself and thus stands for the cause of revela-
tion" (Troll, 1978: 181). He was also critical of much of the
hadith literature, dismissing it as being inauthentic. Like the
Ahl-e Hadith, he denied the legitimacy of the four Sunni law
schools, looking to the Qur'an and the example of the Prophet
for guidance. On the power of personal praver (dua) to change
one's ultimate fate, he believed that God "is pleased with such
prayer and accepts it as He accepts anv other form of service.
\7" ... Performance of this prayer brings about in man's heart —kzj~
patience and firmness" (Troll, 1978: 182). But he held that it
did not change one's predetermined destiny. The concept of
intercession and mediation between man and God were thus
also denied.
Savvid Ahmad Khan's reformist ideas were intimatelv con-
j j j
nected with the political context of late nineteenth-centurv
British India. He came from a family which had been associated
with Mughal rule, and he keenlv felt the loss of that rule. In his
view, Muslims had lost out to the British because thev had failed
to keep up with the scientific progress of the West and had
allowed their practice of the faith to lapse as "well. Judging that
British rule over India was there to stay for the foreseeable
future, he set out on the one hand to cultivate good relations
with the British and on the other to encourage Muslims to
acquire the new linguistic and scientific skills necessary to suc-
ceed in the new era.
^>
ch2.044 10/12/2004 5:11 PM Page 4'
44 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
In the educational realm, Savvid Ahmad Khan's modernist,
progressive vision expressed itself in the Muhammadan
Anglo -Oriental (MAO) College, founded in Aligarh in 187S.
The college was modeled on Oxford and Cambridge (he had
spent two years, 1 869— 70, in Britain, studying everything from
factories to schools). Not only would the curriculum offer an
array ofWestern subjects (the natural sciences, mathematics,
literature, and so on) , but it would also be residential. Over the
years, as David Lelvveld (1978) eloquently demonstrates, the
school fostered a strong sense of belonging — even brother-
hood — among the students, many of whom had come from
outside the immediate geographical area. Sayyid Ahmad Khan's
goal of training a generation of Muslims who would become
part of the new government structure was also partially real-
ized, to the extent that three-quarters of school graduates got
government positions. But there could be no sense of equality
between the British and Aligarh's Muslims: "however skilled in
\7" Western culture some Indians might become, the pall of arro- ~x3~
gant racism, inherent in the colonial situation, meant that full
acceptance of Indians as equals never happened" (Metcalf,
1982:334).
Savvid Ahmad Khan had to concede defeat on the religious
front as well. So controversial a figure was he on account of his
reformist ideas that the Muslims of Aligarh and elsewhere "were
initially reluctant to support his new institution. The British
stepped in not onlv with funds but in many cases "with profes-
sors as well. Sayvid Ahmad did his best to reassure Muslim
parents that their children would not be taught radical ideas bv
hiring some of his fiercest critics as professors in the religious
studies department. Consequently the program of religious
education at MAO College, while reformist in the Deobandi
sense, appears to have been uncontroversial.
In sum, Aligarh's MAO College was aWestern-style institu-
tion, unlike the Dar al-'Ulum at Deoband and that of the same
^>
ch2.044 10/12/2004 5:11 PM Page 4
^
THE MUSLIM RESPONSE 45
name started by the Nadwat al-'Ulama in Lucknow in the
1 890s. It shared with them a sense that Islamic education
needed reform in order to be meaningful in the late nineteenth
centurv. Unlike the Deobandi madrasa, both the Nadwa and
Savvid Ahmad Khan also aspired to some form of political asso-
ciation with the British. In the early twentieth century, MAO
College — which was recognized as a university and renamed
Aligarh Muslim University in 1920 — fulfilled its promise by
becoming the training ground for several prominent Indian
Muslim nationalists.
The Ahmadi Movement
The Ahmadi movement, which was highly controversial, was
founded by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (d. 1908), in 1889. Ghulam
Ahmad was born in the village of Qadiyan, Panjab, in the
Qj 1 830s, to a familv that had prospered during Mughal times but — (^y-
had lost much of its wealth during Sikh rule. He credited the
British with an improvement in his family's fortunes, and in
later years "was noticeably pro-British in his politics. His educa-
tion was traditional (study of the Qur'an, Arabic, and other
subjects) , but acquired at home, not at a madrasa.
Unlike most of the other Muslim movements discussed in
this book, the Ahmadis can date the beginning of their move-
ment precisely, for in March 1 889 Ghulam Ahmad held a cere-
mony of sufi initiation (bay 'a) at which he accepted his first
disciples in the city of Ludhiana, Panjab. From 1891 onward,
the group held annual meetings each December "to enable
every Ahmadi to increase his religious knowledge by listening
to speeches, ... to strengthen the fraternal bonds between the
members, and to make plans for missionary activity in Europe
and in America" (Friedmann, 1989: 5). The initial activities of
the movement revolved around public oral debates with
^>
ch2.044 10/12/2004 5:11 PM Page 4(
46 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
Hindus (the Arya Samaj) about miracles and eternal salvation,
with Christians about the death of Jesus Christ and Christ's
divinity, and with other Muslims (the Ahl-e Hadith), also about
Jesus Christ. Ghulam Ahmad was also a prolific writer of books
and articles in Urdu, Arabic, and Persian, and in 1902 began an
English monthlv periodical, The Review of Religions, which has
continued to be published ever since. The third significant
thrust of the movement has been a missionarv one, with
emphasis particularly on growth in Britain.
The disagreements between the Ahmadivva and other Sunni
Muslims in South Asia are mainlv over Ghulam Ahmad's claims
to religious authority. He believed he was the "mujaddid,
renewer (of religion) at the beginning of the fourteenth cen-
tury of Islam; muhaddath, a person frequently spoken to by
Allah or one of His angels; and mahdi, 'the rightlv guided one,
the messiah,' expected by the Islamic tradition to appear at the
end of days" (Friedmann, 1989: 49). Of the three claims made
\7" here, the second, that of being spoken to by Allah, was particu- ~x3~
larly controversial, as the rank of muhaddath is considered to be
only slightly below that of prophethood and implies direct
communication with God. No Sunni reformer had ever
claimed it before. By contrast, the claim to the status of Mahdi
is relatively common in Sunni history, and several claimants
appeared in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, associ-
ated with anticolonial jihad movements against British or
French rule. It was not, however, as a militant Mahdi that
Ghulam Ahmad cast himself. On the contrary, he denied not
only the obligatory nature, but also the very legitimacy of
jihad in the sense of armed confrontation, an extraordinarily
bold heretical move only partly explained in terms of his
positive attitude to British rule. In his view, jihad was to be
interpreted as the peaceful attempt to spread the faith through
conversion.
Ghulam Ahmad was fierce in his denunciation of the Indian
^>
ch2.044 10/12/2004 5:11 PM Page Ay
THE MUSLIM RESPONSE 47
'ulama, who in his view had allowed Islam to fall into a sorry
state :
Like leaders of other revivalist and messianic movements in
Islam, Ghulam Ahmad was convinced that Islamic religion,
Islamic society, and the position of Islam vis-a-vis other
faiths sank in his times to unprecedented depths. Corruption,
blameworthy innovations (bida'), tomb worship (qabr parasti) ,
worship of Sufi shaykhs (pir parasti) , and even polytheism
became rampant. The Islamic way of life was replaced
with drinking, gambling, prostitution, and internal
strife. The Qur'an was abandoned, and (non-Islamic)
philosophy became the people's qibla [guide]. (Friedmann,
1989: 105)
More specifically, Ghulam Ahmad accused the 'ulama of failing
to stem the tide of Christian influence in India. Ghulam Ahmad
propounded a number of anti-Christian arguments. In agree-
Qj ment with the Qur'an (4: 1 57), he maintained that Christ had — (^y-
not died on the cross, but whereas most Muslims believe that
he is alive and will return together with the Mahdi, Ghulam
Ahmad claimed that he had died at the age of a hundred and
twenty and was buried in Srinagar, the capital of Kashmir. For
Ghulam Ahmad, belief in the death of Jesus was important in
light of the Christian missionaries' denunciation of the Prophet
Muhammad as a dead prophet, in contrast to Jesus Christ who,
they said, was alive in heaven and would one day return (as the
Sunnis agreed). In Ghulam Ahmad's depiction of the second
coming, he, Ghulam Ahmad, would be the messiah, not Jesus
Christ. "By claiming that Jesus died a natural death, Ghulam
Ahmad tried to deprive Christianity of the all-important cruci-
fixion of its founder. In doing this he was following classical
Muslim tradition. Bv claiming affinitv with Jesus, he went one
step further: he tried to deprive Christianity of Jesus himself"
(Friedmann, 1989: 118).
^>
ch2.044 10/12/2004 5:11 PM Page 4i
48 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
Two further theological ideas need to be understood in this
brief summary, namelv, Ghulam Ahmad's ideas about prophecy
and his claim to be a "shadowy" (zilli) prophet himself. As
Friedmann makes clear, these ideas — and indeed other aspects
of Ghulam Ahmad's thought — are based on sufi concepts trace-
able to Ibn 'Arabi (d. 1240). Ibn 'Arabi believed that the total
cessation of prophecy after the death of the Prophet
Muhammad would have left the Muslim community utterly
bereft. This was impossible in his view, so he postulated that
prophecy had continued in a new form. There were two differ-
ent tvpes of prophecv, he said, the legislative, which is superior
and which had ceased on the death of the Prophet, and the non-
legislative, which is given to sufis of extraordinary caliber and
insight and which he claimed for himself. Friedmann sums up
the difference, in Ghulam Ahmad's view, between the Prophet
and himself as follows :
^~A while it is true that no law-giving prophet can appear after f"\
Muhammad, prophetic perfections are continuously
bestowed upon his most accomplished followers, such as
Ghulam Ahmad, to whom Allah speaks and reveals his secrets.
However, since Ghulam Ahmad attained this position only by
his faithful following of Muhammad, his prophethood does
not infringe upon Muhammad's status as the seal of the
prophets. (Friedmann, 199S: 56)
Furthermore, after Muhammad's mission had been com-
pleted, Muslims were the only ones favored with direct com-
munication from God bv having people among them who were
muhaddath .This proved their superiority over Christianity.
A few years after Ghulam Ahmad's death in 1 908, the move-
ment split into two factions, subsequently known as the
Qadivanis and the Lahoris (after the places where they have
their headquarters; Qadivan is now in India, Lahore in
Pakistan). The Qadivanis, led bv Ghulam Ahmad's son, were
^>
ch2.044 10/12/2004 5:11 PM Page 4<
THE MUSLIM RESPONSE 49
more numerous and supported Ghulam Ahmad's prophetic
claim, while the Lahoris watered it down, rejecting his claim to
prophethood and only accepting him as a Renewer (mujaddid)
rather than a prophet. (In the 1 970s and 1 980s, the Ahmadis of
both factions 'were declared non-Muslims in Pakistan bv a con-
stitutional amendment and other legislative means.)
"0" "&
^>
ch2.044 10/12/2004 5:11 PM Page 5C
O
"&
O
ch3.044 10/12/2004 5:17 PM Page 5]
AHMAD RIZA KHAN: LIFE
OF A MUSLIM SCHOLAR
A!
hmad Riza Khan 'was born in Bareillv, in the western
.United Provinces, in 18S6, just a year before the great
Indian Revolt. A story is told about his grandfather, Maulana
Riza 'Ali Khan (1809—65/66), relating to the British resump-
tion of control over Bareillv after the Revolt had been put down
in that town:
-$-
After the tumult of 1 8S7, the British tightened the reins of
power and committed atrocities toward the people, and
everybody went about feeling scared. Important people left
their houses and went back to their villages. But Maulana Riza
o
'Ali Khan continued to live in his house as before, and would
go to the mosque five times a day to say his prayers in
congregation. One day some Englishmen passed by the
mosque, and decided to see if there was anyone inside so they
could catch hold of them and beat them up. They went inside
and looked around but didn't see anyone. Yet the Maulana was
there at the time. Allah had made them blind, so that they
would be unable to see him. . . . [When] he came out of the
mosque, they were still watching out for people, but no one
saw him. (Bihari, 1938:5)
Bihari goes on to quote the Qur ' anic verse, "And We shall raise
a barrier in front of them and a barrier behind them, and cover
51
^>
ch3.044 10/12/2004 5:17 PM Page 52
52 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
them over so that they will not be able to see" (36: 9, Ahmed
'Ali translation).
The storv is interesting at many levels. It casts Maulana Riza
'Ali as a fierce opponent of the British who put his trust in God
instead of fleeing and who was so holv and so good that God pro-
tected him, blinding the enemy to his presence. This miracle, for
so it "was described (karamat) , was a sign of his eminence as a sufi
(mvstic).The title of Maulana before his name shows that he was
also a religious scholar (faqih). Or, to put it another way, he
didn't just practice his faith bv meticulously adhering to the Law
(shari'a), he also lived it and breathed it in his inner being.
Ahmad Riza Khan's familv had not always been associated
with religious learning. His ancestors were Pathans who had
probably migrated from Qandahar (in present-day Afghanistan)
in the seventeenth century, joining Mughal service as soldiers
and administrators. One familv member eventually settled
down in Bareillv, where he was awarded a land grant bv the
\7" Mughal ruler. There followed a brief interlude in Awadh, when —kzj~
Ahmad Riza Khan's great-grandfather served the nawab in
Lucknow, probably in the late 1700s, when Mughal power was
in decline and Awadh in the ascendant. The nawab is said to have
given Hafiz Kazim 'Ali Khan, Ahmad Riza's great-grandfather,
two revenue-free properties. These properties were in the fam-
ily's possession until 1 954 (Hasnain Riza Khan, 1986:40^+1).
We know that Hafiz Kazim 'Ali later returned to Bareillv, for
that is where his son Riza 'Ali (Ahmad Riza's grandfather) grew
up. It was Riza 'Ali who made the break from soldiering and
state administration to become a scholar and sufi. In the earlv
nineteenth centurv, at a time when Muslim states all over India
were bowing to British power, the opportunities for a soldier
who sought a Muslim patron were diminishing rapidly. Riza
'Ali was educated atTonk, the onlv Muslim state in central India
(where, as mentioned in the previous chapter, Sayyid Ahmad
had been a soldier in the ruler's army in the 1820s). After
^>
ch3.044 10/12/2004 5:17 PM Page 51;
AHMAD RIZA KHAN: LIFE OF A MUSLIM SCHOLAR 53
completing his study of the Dars-i Nizami svllabus there by
the age of twenty-three, he returned to Bareillv and made his
reputation as a scholar.
Ahmad Riza's father, Naqi 'Ali Khan (1 83 1—80), carried on
the scholarly tradition begun bv his father, while also looking
after the family properties. By this time the family owned sev-
eral villages in the adjoining districts of Bareillv and Badavun.
The Revolt of 18S7 did not affect the familv significantlv,
though some property in Rampur was lost in its aftermath
because of failure to find the title deeds and prove ownership to
the British. Relations with the British appear to have been
indirect but cordial. Ahmad Riza's nephew Hasnain Riza owned
a printing press which later published many of Ahmad Riza's
writings. Hasnain Riza reportedly collected certain fees from
the police tribunal for the British, acted as arbitrator between
Muslims in the town, and mediated between them and the
British on occasion. He did not, however, -work for the British
\7" in an official capacity. —kzj~
The family also had close ties with officials in Rampur state,
which, as noted in chapter 1 , retained its independence under
a Muslim nawab throughout the period of British rule. Thus,
for instance, Ahmad Riza's father-indaw "was an employee at
the Rampur Post Office, and attended the nawab 's court
(Hasnain Riza Khan, 1986: 152). Rampur 's nawabs had been
Shi'is since the 1840s — all but one, that is: Kalb 'Ali Khan
(r. 1 865— 87) "who was a Sunni.
RAMPUR STATE
As noted earlier (pp. 6—7), Rampur state was founded by
Faizullah Khan in the 1 770s bv treaty with Warren Hastings, then
the Governor of Bengal. It was all that was left to the Rohillas
after the absorption of Rohilkhand by the up-and-coming state
^>
ch3.044 10/12/2004 5:17 PM Page 54
54 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
of Awadh to the east. Having acquired a little state of his own,
Faizullah Khan put down his arms and devoted the remaining
vears of his life to developing Rampur as a center of Muslim
cultural life and sought to attract writers, poets, and other men
of literary or scholarlv talent to his court. There is some evi-
dence that he founded the Raza Library, which is in operation
to this dav, home to a large collection of valuable manuscripts
in Arabic, Persian, and Urdu.
Awadh became increasinglv indebted to the East India
Companv over the course of the early nineteenth centurv, and
was finallv forced to cede power to the Companv altogether in
1 856. The Rampur court then rose as an alternative source of
patronage to which people would travel in search of emplov-
ment. "Mulla Hasan [of Farangi Mahall] went from Lucknow
to Shahjahanpur, and thence to Rampur via Delhi; Mawlana
'Abd 'Ali Bahr al-'Ulum (1731-1810) from Lucknow to
Shahjahanpur, to Rampur, to Buhar in Bengal and finallv to
\7" Madras" (Robinson, 2001 : 23). The 'ulama of Farangi Mahall, it —kzj~
should be noted, were Sunni bv persuasion. The Rampur court,
which became Shi'i in the 1 840s, was hospitable to both Sunnis
and Shi 'is.
The court welcomed a number of poets, most famouslv, in
the nineteenth century, Mirza Ghalib (d. 1869), who taught
poetry to Rampur 's nawab,Yusuf 'Ali Khan (r. 1855— 65).Yusuf
'Ali was himself a poet. From 1859, he began to send Ghalib a
regular monthly grant for correcting his poetry and writing
occasional panegvrics on important state occasions. Contrary
to custom (andYusuf 'Ali's preference), Ghalib was permitted
to live in Delhi, making onlv occasional visits to the Rampur
court. Ghalib, like manv of his contemporaries, wrote not only
in Persian — the language of choice for the educated elites of all
communities, Muslim as well as Hindu, throughout the
eighteenth and the first half of the nineteenth centuries — but
also in Urdu, which rapidlv began to replace Persian in the
^>
ch3.044 10/12/2004 5:17 PM Page 5
^
AHMAD RIZA KHAN: LIFE OF A MUSLIM SCHOLAR 55
second half of the nineteenth century. Thus, Ahmad Riza Khan's
writings, which I will examine in later chapters, were almost
entirely in Urdu.
The madrasa at Rampur known as ' Alivva also attracted well-
known 'ulama from other parts of north India. Among them
were Maulanas Fazl-e Haqq Khairabadi (d. 1861) and 'Abd
ul-Haqq Khairabadi (d. 1 899) , both specialists in the rational sci-
ences (ma 'qulat). It was founded in the eighteenth century with
endowment (waqf) funds from two villages, and enjoved state
patronage under the nawabs. However, it never achieved the sta-
tus of other madrasas in the country, such as Farangi Mahall in
Lucknow or the Madrasa-i Rahimivva in Delhi, where ShahWali
Ullah taught in the eighteenth century. Rampur 's Raza Librarv,
on the other hand, was an institution of great renown. For seven
years, from 1 896 to 1 903, it was managed bv the famous Indian
nationalist leader, Hakim Ajmal Khan (1863—1927), who
expanded the library's holdings on medicine (tibb), enabling it
\7" to become one of the best in the country. A new library building —kzj~
was also constructed at the end of the nineteenth century.
AHMAD RIZA'S EDUCATION AND
SCHOLARLY TRAINING
Ahmad Riza's most important teacher was his father. He stud-
ied the Dars-i Nizami svllabus under his direction, and imbibed
from him the rationalist tradition. The pattern of a student
studying specific books under a single teacher, whether in an
institution such as a madrasa (seminary) or at the teacher's
home, was traditional throughout the Muslim world. At the
end of the period of study, the teacher would give the pupil a
certificate (sanad) stating that the student had studied certain
books under his direction (including glosses and commentaries
thereon) and giving him permission (ijaza) to teach these in
^>
ch3.044 10/12/2004 5:17 PM Page 5(
56 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
turn. Thereafter, if he so wished, the student could continue his
studies under another teacher, with whom he would remain
until he had obtained another certificate testifying to compe-
tence in another set of books. Chains of transmission of author-
ity — recorded in writing at the end of a period of studv — were
thus established between individual teachers and their stu-
dents, for each teacher received the authority to teach from the
one who had taught him. Over time, these chains of authority
linked a vast network of 'ulama in different parts of the countrv
(for an example of such a chain of ma'qulat scholars, see
Robinson 2001: 52-53).
Not surprisinglv, in view of the strong ties between teachers
and their students, the intellectual positions taken by the for-
mer often stamped themselves indelibly on the minds of the
latter. So it was with Ahmad Riza Khan. His father's stand on a
number of theological issues in the mid-nineteenth centurv
later also became his own.
SCHOLARLY IMPRINT OF HIS FATHER
One of the well-known debates of the early nineteenth centurv
dealt "with God's omnipotence. Some 'ulama argued that God
had the power, should He so wish, to create another prophet like
Muhammad. Thus, Muhammad Isma'il, author of the Taqwiyat
al-Iman (Strengthening the Faith), had written in the 1 820s:
in a twinkling, solely by pronouncing the word "Be!" [God
could], if he like[d], create crores [tens of millions] of
apostles, saints, genii, and angels, of similar ranks with
Gabriel and Muhammad, or produce a total subversion of
the whole universe, and supply its place with new creations.
(MirShahamat'Ali, tr. (modified), 1 852: 339)
This statement — known as imkan-e nazir, the possibility of an
equal (of the Prophet) — was made in the context of tawhid, as
^>
ch3.044 10/12/2004 5:17 PM Page 5y
AHMAD RIZA KHAN: LIFE OF A MUSLIM SCHOLAR 57
an illustration of God's power. It was strongly opposed by
Maulana Fazl-e Haqq Khairabadi, whose presence at the
Madrasa ' Alivva at Rampur and association with the rationalist
position in 'ulama circles were mentioned earlier. Maulana
Fazl-e Haqq — taking a position known as imtina'-e nazir, or
impossibility of an equal — argued that even God could not pro-
duce another prophet like the Prophet Muhammad.
A generation later, in the 1 85 0s and 1 860s the two views were
expressed again, both verballv and in print, with Naqi ' Ali Khan,
Ahmad Riza's father, echoing Maulana Fazl-e Haqq Khairabadi 's
position. In the 1 890s, Ahmad Riza Khan himself wrote a respon-
sum (fatwa) in which the focus of discussion was no longer on
God's transcendental power but rather on the uniqueness of the
Prophet. Arguing that it 'was impossible for anyone ever to equal
the Prophet (not only in this world but in any of the six levels of
the earth believed to exist apart from this one), he declared that
to maintain otherwise amounted to denial of the finality of his
\7" prophethood and thus to kufr, unbelief. Although the terms of ~x3~
debate had shifted from a discussion of God's powers to
Muhammad's prophethood, Ahmad Riza's stance on this issue, as
on others as well, was clearly influenced bv his father.
EXEMPLARY STORIES
Ahmad Riza's biographer, Zafar ud-Din Bihari, records a
number of stories about Ahmad Riza's spiritual and intellectual
accomplishments as a child. Each of them illustrates a
distinctive aspect of the way his followers came to see him in
later life. Thus, when learning the Arabic alphabet from his
grandfather, Ahmad Riza is said to have instinctively under-
stood the deeper significance of the letter "la"— a composite let-
ter with which the attestation of faith (the kalima or shahada, lit.
"witness") begins. He grasped not onlv its outward meaning,
^>
ch3.044 10/12/2004 5:17 PM Page 5£
58 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
that related to the Oneness of God, but also its inner, gnostic
meaning, communicated to him bv his grandfather. This story is
significant in light of the fact that Ahmad Riza went on to
become both an 'alim or scholar of Islamic law, and a sufi or
mystic seeker of God.
Other stories claim that at four, Ahmad Riza had memorized
the entire Qur'an by heart, and at six he addressed a gathering
of worshipers at the mosque from the pulpit on the occasion of
the Prophet's birthday (an annual celebration at which he
addressed large crowds from the mosque in later years) .When
studying the Dars-i Nizami from his father he showed that he
had outstripped him in knowledge bv answering a criticism
noted by him on the margins. His father was very happy to see
this and embraced him. And when he was fourteen — much
vounger than most scholars in a comparable situation — and had
finished his studies in both the rational (ma 'qulat) and copied
(manqulat) sciences, his father entrusted him with a great
\7" responsibility, that of writing fatawa(Bihari, 1938: 1 1 , 31—33). —kzj~
This was to be the hallmark of his later career as a scholar. The
number of fatawa he wrote from then until his death in 1921
was said to be in the thousands.
Ahmad Riza's superiority of intellect to other 'ulama far
older than him is also illustrated in several stories. Shortly after
his marriage, when he was about twenty, he gave an opinion
that contradicted that of a famous scholar at the Rampur court,
Maulana Irshad Hussain Rampuri.The nawab noticed this and
upon enquiry discovered that Ahmad Riza was the son-indaw
of one ofhis courtiers. So he asked to meethim (Bihari, 1938:
1 35). Accordingly, Ahmad Riza Khan came to court. Impressed
by both his youth and his erudition, the nawab suggested that
Ahmad Riza would profit by studying under the famous
Maulana 'Abd ul-Haqq Khairabadi, who had a reputation as a
scholar of logic and "who attended the Rampur court. Ahmad
Riza replied that if his father gave his permission, he would be
^>
ch3.044 10/12/2004 5:17 PM Page 5?
AHMAD RIZA KHAN: LIFE OF A MUSLIM SCHOLAR 59
happv to stay in Rampur for a few days and study with 'Abd
ul-Haqq. Just then 'Abd ul-Haqq himself came into the room.
The story continues:
Maulana 'Abd ul-Haqq believed that there were only two and
a half 'ulamain the world: one, Maulana Bahr ul-'Ulum ['Abd
al-'Ali of Farangi Mahall, d. 1810—1 1], the second, his father
[Fazl-e Haqq Khairabadi, d. 1 861], and the last half, himself.
How could he tolerate this young boy being called an 'alim?
He asked Ahmad Riza: Which is the most advanced book you
have read in logic?
Ahmad Riza answered: Qazi mubarak.
He then asked: Have you read Sharah tahzib?
Ahmad Riza Khan, hearing the derision in his voice, asked:
Oh, do you teach Sharah tahzib after Qazi mubarak over here?
['Abd ul-Haqq decided to try a different approach. He asked:]
What are you working on right now?
Ahmad Riza: Teaching, writing of fatawa, and writing.
f~^\ 'Abd ul-Haqq: In what field do you write? f"\
Ahmad Riza: Legal questions (masa'il), religious sciences
{diniyat), and rebuttal of Wahhabis (radd-e wahhabiyya) .
'Abd ul-Haqq: Rebuttal of Wahhabis? [A discussion about the
best authority in this field of disputation followed, at the end
of which 'Abd ul-Haqq fell silent.] (Bihari, 1938: 33-34)
The tone of the exchange leaves the reader in no doubt as to the
winner. Ahmad Riza Khan had defeated 'Abd ul-Haqq
Khairabadi, who belonged to an eminent family of 'ulama in
the ma'qulat tradition, with links to Farangi Mahall. Robinson
goes so far as to say that the Farangi Mahalli family's "impact
in northern India ... was intensified by the development of
a powerful offshoot, another great school specializing in
ma'qulat scholarship, that of Khavrabad in western Awadh,
whose notable scholars [included] Fazl-e Haqq Khairabadi"
(Robinson, 2001: 67). Given that Ahmad Riza's family also
adhered to the tradition of ma 'qulat studies rather than the
^>
ch3.044 10/12/2004 5:17 PM Page 6C
60 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
hadith scholarship emphasized bv the Shah Wali Ullah familv in
Delhi, there was no philosophical difference between the two
men. Moreover, Ahmad Riza's vouth and his own family's rela-
tive obscurity in the world of 'ulama scholarship ('which only
went back two generations) compared to ' Abd ul-Haqq's at this
time, would lead one to expect him to be deferential to the
older man. Instead, the conversation as reported by Zafar
ud-Din Bihari indicates that Ahmad Riza had alreadv mastered
the works of logic (standard texts of the Dars-i Nizami
svllabus) that the nawab of Rampur had suggested he study
under 'Abd ul-Haqq.The only person who ever corrected any
of Ahmad Riza Khan's writings, Bihari reports, was his father,
Naqi'AliKhan.
Apparently Ahmad Riza Khan took a personal dislike to 'Abd
ul-Haqq Khairabadi, for we are told that on another occasion
when Ahmad Riza was traveling to Khairabad with a revered
friend of the family, who was planning to visit 'Abd ul-Haqq
\7" Khairabadi, Ahmad Riza refused to accompanv him, saying that —kzj~
'Abd ul-Haqq was in the habit of saving things "detrimental to
the glorv (shan) of the . . . 'ulama", and that he would therefore
prefer to visit someone else (Bihari, 1938: 176).
The fact that Ahmad Riza's visit to the nawab 's court was
occasioned bv his writing an opinion that contradicted
Maulana Irshad Hussain Rampuri's is also part of this pattern.
If the exchange with Maulana 'Abd ul-Haqq tells the reader
about the depth of his learning and the range of his scholarship
(I will examine "what he meant by "rebutting Wahhabis" in a
subsequent chapter), his contradiction of Maulana Irshad
Hussain is intended to show that he had an independent
mind, was a skillful logician, and had outstripped his elders
early on in his career. The spirit of competition demonstrated
here was also to characterize the claims and counterclaims
made by rival Muslim movements in the later nineteenth
century
^>
ch3.044 10/12/2004 5:17 PM Page 61
AHMAD RIZA KHAN: LIFE OF A MUSLIM SCHOLAR 61
SUFI DISCIPLESHIP TO SHAH AL-E RASUL
OF MAREHRA
If the responsibility for writing fatawa at age fourteen at the end
of his Dars-i Nizami studies marked a watershed in Ahmad
Riza's life, so too did his discipleship to Sayyid Shah Al-e Rasul
in 1877, when he was twenty-one. Shah Al-e Rasul was in his
eighties at the time and died two years later, so the tie between
them was not close — for Ahmad Riza had not spent time with
him prior to his discipleship, not even the customary forty-day
period (chilla) of waiting and training. Shortly before his death,
however, Shah Al-e Rasul entrusted Ahmad Riza's spiritual
development to his grandson, Shah Abu'l Husain Ahmad,
known as Nuri Mivan (1839—1906), who was Ahmad Riza's
senior by about fifteen years, and the relationship between the
two men did become close.
THE IMPORTANCE OF DREAMS
Ahmad Riza's biographv indicates the importance of the tie
between Shah Al-e Rasul and Ahmad Riza bv reference to
dreams. Thus it is recorded that before his journey to Marehra
with his father, Ahmad Riza experienced a period of painful
spiritual longing. His grandfather appeared to him in a
dream and assured him that he would soon be relieved of his
pain. The prophecv was fulfilled when Maulana 'Abd ul-Qadir
Badavuni came to their house and suggested that both father
and son affiliate themselves to Shah Al-e Rasul. Shah Al-e
Rasul was also awaiting his arrival, for he already knew (we
are told) that this new disciple would be the gift he could
present to God after his death, when God would ask him "what
he had brought Him from this world (Hasnain Riza Khan,
1986: 55— 56). Because he was alreadv so well advanced
^>
ch3.044 10/12/2004 5:17 PM Page 62
62 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
spiritually, the forty-day waiting period had not been
necessary.
SAYYIDS OF THE QADIRI ORDER OF
SUFIS
The decision as to whom Ahmad Riza and his father should bind
themselves (for they did so together) in this all-important
relationship was probably dictated in part by Shah Al-e Rasul's
genealogical history. The Barkativya family of Marehra to
which Shah Al-e Rasul belonged were Sayvids, or descendants
of the Prophet through his daughter Fatima and son-in-law
' Ali. His very name "Al-e Rasul," meaning "[the] family of the
Prophet," indicates as much. Other males in the family had
similar names. Shah Al-e Rasul's younger brother, for example,
"was calledAwlad-e Rasul, or"children of the Prophet." Women
in the family "were often named Fatima or a compound thereof,
such as Khairiyat Fatima, "Fatima's well-being." Although such
names were not limited to Savvid families, in this case they
were indicative of such status.
The Barkativva Savvids had migrated to India, via Iraq and
Ghazni (in present-day Afghanistan), in the thirteenth century.
They had settled down in Marehra, a small country town
(qasba) about a hundred and twenty miles southeast of Delhi, in
the seventeenth century, after an earlier period of residence in
Bilgram, western Awadh.The Mughals had awarded religious
families such as the Barkativva Savvids revenue-free (mu'aji or
madad-e ma 'ash) lands to support them. The family name prob-
ably referred to their illustrious seventeenth-century ancestor,
Savvid Barkat Ullah (1660—1729), who founded the hospice
(khanqah) around which later generations of the family lived
and grew up. In time, their settlement came to be known as
"Basti Pirzadagan" (Qadiri, c. 1927) .
^>
ch3.044 10/12/2004 5:17 PM Page 63
AHMAD RIZA KHAN: LIFE OF A MUSLIM SCHOLAR 63
The sufi affiliation of the Barkativva Savvids was with the
Qadiri order, one of the three major sufi orders in India since
the eighteenth century (the others are the Chishti and the
Naqshbandi). The Qadiri order traces its origins to 'Abd
al-Qadir Jilani Baghdadi (d. 1166), and has been popular in
South Asia since the fifteenth centurv. I take up the significance
of this sufi affiliation to Ahmad Riza in the next chapter.
GOING ON PILGRIMAGE, 1878
Shortly after Ahmad Riza became Shah Al-e Rasul's disciple in
the ritual known as bai 'a, he and his father undertook another
important journev, namelv, the pilgrimage to Mecca. By per-
forming this ritual, Ahmad Riza was fulfilling one of the
so-called "pillars" of Islam, a necessary step before he could
assume his role as the leader and Renewer of his community. In
-(^y— this sense, he was undertaking a rite of passage, a transforma- — (^y-
tive event which allowed him to return to Bareillv with greater
authority.
j
Mecca and Medina, the two holiest cities for Muslims, were
under Ottoman control at this time. Mecca is the center of the
Muslim pilgrimage because it houses the sanctuary which
Abraham is believed to have built with his son Ishmael in
antiquitv and also because it is the city in which Muhammad was
born. Bv the nineteenth century it "was first and foremost as the
Prophet's birthplace that it "was revered. Medina, the city where
Muhammad lived in the second phase of his career and where he
is buried, is not a part of the pilgrimage. But because he is buried
there, many Muslims making the pilgrimage visit it too. Ahmad
Riza and his father, not surprisinglv, went to both places.
While Ahmad Riza was in Mecca he received recognition
from 'ulama in high positions of authoritv. Savvid Ahmad
Dahlan, the mufti of the Shafi'i law school, gave him a certificate
^>
ch3.044 10/12/2004 5:17 PM Page 64
64 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
(sanad ) in several fields of knowledge — hadith (the traditions
of the Prophet), exegesis of the Qur'an (tafsir) , jurisprudence
(Jiqh), and principles of jurisprudence (usul-ejiqh) .The other
scholar to do so was the mufti of the Hanafi school of law.
Although Ahmad Riza had not studied under these scholars
formally thev authorized him to teach in the fields thev had
j j j
specified and to cite their names when doing so.
Equally important, though in a different way, was his
encounter with Husain bin Saleh, the ShafTi imam. The latter
noticed him one dav during the evening praver and took him
aside. We are told that he held"his forehead for a long time, sav-
ing at length that he saw Allah's light in it. He then gave him a
new name, Zia ud-Din Ahmad, and a certificate in the six col-
lections of hadith, as well as one in the Qadiri order, signing it
with his own hand" (Rahman 'Ali, 1961: 99). This encounter
emphasized the spiritual (sufi) rather than the scholarly sources
of Ahmad Riza's authority. So too did another — Medinan —
\7" experience, a dream in which Ahmad Riza was assured that -\^r
he was absolved of all his sins. As most Muslims believe that
this assurance is granted to very few, this vision can be read as
a claim to leadership of the Ahl-e Sunnat movement in
coming vears.
AHMAD RIZA AS MUJADDID
Ahmad Riza's proclamation as the mujaddid of the fourteenth
Islamic centurv occurred in unusual circumstances and in an
unusual manner. Throughout the 1 890s the Ahl-e Sunnat had
been busy organizing meetings opposing the Nadwat
al-'Ulama. Ahmad Riza had plaved an active part in this oppos-
ition movement, writing some two hundred fatawa on this
issue alone. Starting in 1897, the Ahl-e Sunnat also published a
monthlv journal (Tuhfa-e Hanajlyya, the Hanafi Gift) from
^>
ch3.044 10/12/2004 5:17 PM Page 6
^
AHMAD RIZA KHAN: LIFE OF A MUSLIM SCHOLAR 65
Patna, Bihar, which brought together anti-Nadwa articles,
poems, and news reports about the annual meetings. It was in
print until about 1910.
Ahmad Riza's stature was heightened when one of his fatawa
was published in 1900 with the approval and certification of
sixteen 'ulama from Mecca and seven from Medina. In October
of that vear the annual meeting of the Ahl-e Sunnat 'ulama took
place in Patna, during which time a new madrasa, the Madrasa
Hanafiyya, was formally opened. The Nadwa was holding its
own annual meeting in a different part of town. In fact the
Ahl-e Sunnat appears to have deliberatelv chosen to hold its
meeting in the same place and at the same time as the Nadwa,
in order the better to undercut its message.
It was during the weekdong meetings that occurred at Patna
that one of the 'ulama present referred to Ahmad Riza in his ser-
mon as the "mujaddid of the present centurv." According to
Zafar ud-Din Bihari, all those present seconded the idea, and
\7" later thousands of others, including several 'ulama from the —kzj~
Haramain (Mecca and Medina) did so as well. As he writes,
there was thus consensus among the 'ulama of the Ahl-e Sunnat
on the question. Zafar ud-Din adds that Ahmad Riza fulfilled
the requirements of a mujaddid, namelv, that he (it could not be
a woman) be a Sunni Muslim of sound belief, endowed with
knowledge of all the Islamic "sciences and skills," the "most
famous among the celebrated of his age," defending the faith
without fear of "innovators" "who would criticize him, and also,
according to Zafar ud-Din, a profound sufi. He also had to sat-
isfy the technical requirement that he be well known when one
centurv ended and the other began (or, as Bihari puts it, at the
end of the century in which he was born and the beginning of
the centurv in which he "was to die) .The thirteenth Islamic cen-
tury had ended on 1 1 November 1882, and Ahmad Riza had
indeed begun to establish a reputation among the 'ulama of
north India bv then. The fact that 'ulama in Mecca and Medina
^>
ch3.044 10/12/2004 5:17 PM Page Si
66 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
were ready to append their names to his commentary on the
Prophet's knowledge of the unseen (see below) was taken by
his followers as confirmation that he was indeed the mujaddid of
the fourteenth Islamic century.
FATWA WRITING
Ahmad Riza's scholarly reputation rested primarily on his writ-
ing of fatawa, a responsibility entrusted to him by his father when
he "was fourteen and carried out until his death in 1 92 1 . A fatwa
is written in answer to a question asked by a Muslim man or
woman to a mufti, a scholar of Islamic law, about a legal or moral
problem, such as an inheritance dispute, a debate about vari-
ations in the prayer ritual, or questions of faith and belief. The
legal questions are not usually of the type posed to lawyers in the
West, for the law in which the mufti is an expert is religious law.
-yy— The nearest equivalent in the West to a fatwa is rather the answers —yy-
to the questions posed to "the Ethicist" in the New York Times
Sunday Magazine. In a Muslim city, there are hundreds of
"ethicists," all willing to answer questions. They are the religious
scholars, known as muftis when they act as authors of fatawa.
To qualifv as a mufti, a scholar needs to have expert know-
ledge of sources of the law — the Qur'an, the sunna (the
example of the Prophet), the consensus of the community
(ijma), and analogical reasoning (qiyas) — as well as familiarity
with the legal tradition of the school (madhhab) to which he
himself and the questioner belong. If no direct answer could be
found in the sources, a person endowed with such knowledge
was qualified to applv his judgment (ijtihad) to the question at
hand. The latitude permitted to a mufti — or that he permitted
himself — in interpreting the sources has varied considerably
throughout Muslim history. For many centuries ijtihad had
been downplayed, and following one's school of law (taqlid)
^
ch3.044 10/12/2004 5:17 PM Page 67^
AHMAD RIZA KHAN: LIFE OF A MUSLIM SCHOLAR 67
had been the norm. This was also the case in colonial India.
But regardless of the mufti's theoretical stand on ijtihad, the
activity had never ceased in practice, since new problems and
questions constantly needed answers. The mufti's answer,
while considered authoritative (on account of his knowledge),
did not have the force of law.
The question-and-answer format of a fatwa is also worth
noting. Some hold it to go back to the Prophet himself, on those
occasions when he acted in his own capacity when asked a ques-
tion: "It is reported, for example, that [a believer] asked the
Prophet, 'O Messenger of God, is the pilgrimage to be per-
formed every year or onlv once?' He replied, 'Onlv once, and
whoever does it more than once, that is an [especiallv meritori-
ous] act' " (Masud, Messick, and Powers, 1996: 6). Such reports
are recorded in the hadith literature, which complements the
Qur'an as a secondarv source. In later generations, the activitv
of the mufti was seen as a continuation of the Prophet's
\7" example. Thus the fourteenth-centurv scholar al-Shatibi wrote —kzj~
that "the mufti stands before the Muslim community in the
same place as the Prophet stood" (Masud, Messick, and
Powers, 1996:8).
Because the work of writing fatawa "was "religious" in nature
— in other words, it was a means of guidance and benefit to
other Muslims — muftis were forbidden to take bribes or gifts
of any kind from the person who had asked the question. Even
private muftis were expected to render their judgments for
free (muftis who worked for the state received salaries, like
the qadis in Islamic courts) . Whether all did so is unlikelv. In
some cases, the problem of compensation was solved bv the
creation of pious endowments (awkaf) specificallv for muftis
and teachers.
In colonial India, as noted in previous chapters, the loss of
state power and the lack of qadis in British Indian courts
increased the need for muftis, as thev were the sole authoritv
^>
ch3.044 10/12/2004 5:17 PM Page 6£
68 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
left to guide the community. The latter half of the nineteenth
century also saw a rapid increase in communications networks
and new and inexpensive print technologies that allowed
'ulama such as Ahmad Riza to reach a wider group of people
and forge a network of relationships beyond the immediate
local area. This created competition for followers, especially as
different reform movements made their appearance, so that
the activity of writing and publishing fatawa became highlv
competitive. They "were a way of reaching the hearts and minds
of Sunni Muslims throughout the subcontinent, since thev
dealt with practical issues rather than academic problems of an
erudite nature.
HIDDEN CUES IN A FATWA, OR WHAT A
FATWA MAY NOT TELL US
Fatawa vary from the verv short and simple to the long
and complex, depending on their intended audience — those
written for ordinary believers tend to be simple, straight-
forward, and without citation of sources, while those written
by scholars for scholars were naturally likelv to be complex.
However, even "when simple in form, a fatwa often contains
hidden cues about the scholar's point of view. An example
from a Deobandi fatwa about the pilgrimage, written by
Maulana Rashid Ahmad Gangohi (d. 190S) in the 1890s, is
instructive :
Query: What of a person who goes to Noble Mecca on hajj and
does not go to Medina the Radiant, thinking, "To go to Noble
Medina is not a required duty, but rather a worthy act.
Moreover, why should I needlessly . . . risk . . . property and life
[in view of the marauding tribes along the way] . . . and [spend] a
great deal of money?" ... Is such a person sinful or not?
^>
ch3.044 10/12/2004 5:17 PM Page 6?
AHMAD RIZA KHAN: LIFE OF A MUSLIM SCHOLAR 69
Answer: Not to go to Medina because of such apprehension is a
mark of lack of love for the Pride of the World [the Prophet
Muhammad], on whom be peace. No one abandons a worldly
task out of such apprehension, so why abandon this pilgrimage?
. . . Certainly, to go is not obligatory. [But] some people, at any
rate, think this pilgrimage is a greater source of reward and
blessing than lifting the hands in prayer and saying "amin" out
loud. Do not give up going out of fear of controversy or concern
for your reputation. . . . Even if not a sinner, this person lacks
faith in his basic nature. (Metcalf, 1996: 184)
At first sight the fatwa seems only to be answering a simple ques-
tion, namelv, what the mufti thinks of a nonobligatory ritual act,
that of paving homage to the Prophet bv visiting his grave at
Medina while performing the pilgrimage to Mecca (the latter
being incumbent upon all adult Muslims, men and women, to
perform once in their lifetimes). But on second reading vou
notice that it engages in polemics against the Ahl-e Hadith.
Xy Since Medina is not far from Mecca (about 270 milesnorth), ~xt~
manv Muslims make the journey there either before or after
the pilgrimage itself. But the reply contains several clues that
tell us that the question and answer were directed against the
Ahl-e Hadith. The practice of "lifting the hands in praver and
saving 'amin' out loud" was specific to the Ahl-e Hadith and dis-
tinguished them from other Sunni Muslims in South Asia. It was
also the Ahl-e Hadith who "opposed pilgrimage (ziyarat) to the
Prophet's tomb in Medina, as thev opposed pilgrimage to all
tombs," sharing the orientation of the Wahhabis who "had gone
so far as to destroy the tomb of the Prophet" in the early nine-
teenth century (Metcalf, 1996: 186-187).
Now let us look at a very different case, also from Deoband.
Masud's (1996) studv of two Deobandi fatawa shows how the
'ulama sometimes initiated a process of change in the shari'a
(bv applving their independent reasoning), but used the cit-
ation of respected medieval sources to present their judgment
^>
ch3.044 10/12/2004 5:17 PM Page 7(
70 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
as an exercise in submission to authority (taqlid), that is, the
authority of their particular school of law, which in British
India "was (and is) overwhelmingly Hanafi. Bv comparing two
fatawa bv Maulana Ashraf 'AliThanawi (d. 1943) on "whether
the apostasv of a Muslim woman annulled her marriage, Masud
shows that Thanawi changed his position between 1913, the
date of his first fatwa, and 1931, when he revised his opinion. In
1913, he had ruled that apostasy did result in annulment,
whereas in 1931, applying Maliki law (thus having recourse
to legal opinion in another school, or taljiq), he argued that
"apostasv did not annul the marriage contract and could not be
used as a legal device [to terminate the marriage]" (Masud,
1996: 193-203; cf. p. 37, on the legal issue).
The fatwa is a clear case of the application o£ ijtihad, but is not
presented as such. Had the argument been seen as an instance of
ijtihad being exercised bv a single mufti rather than one which
had the weight of traditional jurisprudential authority behind it ,
\7" it might not have been accepted. As this instance shows, ijtihad— —kzj~
far from being something the mufti could be proud of engaging
in —had to be wrapped up in the guise of taqlid.
This case — dealing with apostasv and the difficult v Muslim
women experienced in initiating a divorce — is clearlv more
complex than the first. The 1931 fatwa (the revised one) was
published as a book of over two hundred pages. Its publication
led to a political effort for marriage reform bv the national
partv representing Deobandi and other 'ulama, the Jamiyvat
al-'Ulama-e Hind, and in 1939 resulted in the enactment of
national legislation in British India to facilitate the dissolution
of Muslim marriage on specific legal grounds.
AHMAD RIZA'S FATAWA
Like the other Muslim movements of the late 1800s, the Ahl-e
Sunnat movement established a Dar al-Ifta, a "house for issuing
^>
ch3.044 10/12/2004 5:17 PM Page 71
AHMAD RIZA KHAN: LIFE OF A MUSLIM SCHOLAR 71
fatawa." Unlike the other movements, however, that of the
Ahl-e Sunnat "was attached to Ahmad Riza's house rather than to
the school established in 1904. It was from here that, assisted bv
his closest and ablest students, he responded to the questions
that came in dailv from all over the countrv.
Zafar ud-Din Bihari, Ahmad Riza's disciple and biographer,
relates that every evening Ahmad Riza would set aside some
time to meet people at his home. The day's mail would some-
times be opened and read out loud. Depending on the nature of
the question, Ahmad Riza would either answer it himself or
pass it on to one of his students to do so. Thus, if it dealt with
sufism (tasawwuf), was particularly complex, or had not come
up before, he would answer it himself. Subjects deemed less
difficult were handled bv a small group of students. He worked
in the privacv of his personal library or in his familv living quar-
ters (zenana khana) , and took pride in answering everv question
as quicklv as possible. Regarding it as a religious (shar 'i) dutv, he
\7" was offended when someone offered him payment for his ~x3~
fatwa. So devoted was he to the task of responding (istifta),
wrote Zafar ud-Din, that he did so even when he was sick. We
are told that on one remarkable occasion he was seen dictating
twentv-nine fatawa to four scribes while sick in bed: while one
scribe wrote down the answer to one question, he dictated the
answer to the second one to another, and so on, until all
twenty -nine questions had been answered (Bihari, 1938:
36-37,68).
It was by writing down and copving fatawa dictated bv
Ahmad Riza that his students learned his stvle of fatwa- writing.
Once thev had mastered the skill, Ahmad Riza was able grad-
ually to entrust some of the work to them. He considered his
student Amjad 'Ali A'zami to be the most skilled, and asked
other students to learn from him.
Many — though bv no means all — of Ahmad Riza's fatawa
were published in a twelve-volume collection known as the
^>
ch3.044 10/12/2004 5:17 PM Page 72
72 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
Fatawa-e Rizwiyya, some at the Hasani Press owned by his
brother. Only two appear to have been published during his
lifetime. Publication of the others did not begin until the
1950s, and was still ongoing in the 1980s. The process was
begun bv Maulana Mustafa Riza Khan (d. 1981), Ahmad Riza's
younger son. Perhaps the lack of funds held back further publi-
cation. Unfortunatelv, when publication was finally resumed it
was found that many of the handwritten fatawa were damaged,
and laborious effort was required to assemble the later vol-
umes. Nonetheless, most of them were published. A different
problem arose when a printer kept delaying publication on one
pretext or another until the editors caught on to the fact that he
had Deobandi views!
Some fatawa discuss a range of issues related to the question
but nevertheless distinct from it, especially when they are long
and complex. Ahmad Riza tended to expand, rather than
restrict the range. So too did the Deobandis in the same period.
\7" As Metcalf savs, "Any categorization of the topics covered in —kzj~
[Rashid Ahmad Gangohi's] pronouncements is necessarily
crude, for a single fatwa could often illustrate at once a variety
of issues concerning belief, practice, jurisprudential prin-
ciples, and attitudes toward other religious groups" (Metcalf,
1982: 148). In a fatwa responding to the question as to whether
a Muslim who had become an Ahmadi "was an apostate, Ahmad
Riza raised issues relating not only to apostasy and marriage but
also to the nature of prophecy.
Ahmad Riza's opinions were alwavs forcefully expressed.
He was decisive in his judgments, giving clear guidance to
his followers on right and wrong and backing up his
opinions by citation of an arrav of scholarly writings that added
to his religious authority. At a time when so many different
points of view were being expressed, one imagines that the
ordinary believer would have found this note of certainty
reassuring.
^>
ch3.044 10/12/2004 5:17 PM Page 7C-
AHMAD RIZA KHAN: LIFE OF A MUSLIM SCHOLAR 73
TWO FATAWA WRITTEN DURING AHMAD
RIZA'S SECOND PILGRIMAGE TO MECCA
In 1 90S— 6, Ahmad Riza went to Mecca and Medina for the sec-
ond time. In 1906, Mecca was a place "where diverse opinions
flourished. The Wahhabi movement (consisting of an alliance
between the followers of Muhammad ibn 'Abd al-Wahhab and
the Saudi family) "was based in Najd in central and eastern
Arabia. In the Hijaz (as coastal northwestern Arabia is known),
however, power was in the hands of Sharif 'Ali (r. 1905—8) of
Mecca. Although technicallv the Sharif (also known as Amir)
was an appointee of the Ottomans — the Hijaz being a province
of the Ottoman empire — in fact the amir exercised
autonomous control. Sharif 'Ali died in 1908, whereupon
Sharif Husavn — memorablv portraved in the film Lawrence of
Arabia for his part in leading the Arab Revolt against the
Ottomans — came to power.
r~) Ahmad Riza's views found a receptive audience among some — £^-
Meccan 'ulama who disliked the Wahhabi perspective. By this
time he "was a well-known Indian scholar, one who had been in
correspondence with the 'ulama of the Hijaz during the 1890s
when he had sought confirmation for his fatawa in opposition to
the Nadwa.Two Meccan 'ulama now asked for his opinion on the
status of paper money. In response he wrote a fatwa entitled
Kafl al-Faqih al-Fahimfi Ahkam Qirtas al-Darahim (Guarantee of
the Discerning Jurist on Duties relating to Paper Monev) . One
scholar reportedlv stated, "Although he was a Hindi [an Indian] ,
his light was shining in Mecca" (Malfuzat, vol. 2, p. 17). There
were other marks of respect: confirmation of his opinion on a
ritual related to the pilgrimage (despite a contrary opinion bv
some Meccan scholars) and visits to his home. Bearing in mind
that onlv a segment of the 'ulama was involved, we might even say
that relations between center and periphery, Mecca and India,
had been reversed during Ahmad Riza's three-month stay.
^>
ch3.044 10/12/2004 5:17 PM Page 74
74 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
Ahmad Riza wrote three fatawa while in Mecca. While the
first is the one on paper money, the second, Al-Dawlat
al-Makkiyya bi'l Maddat al-Ghaybiyya (The Meccan Reign onThat
Which Is Hidden), deals with the Prophet, particularly his
"knowledge of the unseen" ('ilm-e ghaib), which had been an
object of debate between Ahmad Riza and the Deobandi 'ulama
for some time. (The third fatwa, Husam al-Haramayn 'ala Manhar
al-Kufr wa'l Mayn [The Sword of the Haramavn at the Throat of
Unbelief and Falsehood] , is discussed in the next chapter.)
Ahmad Riza made two related arguments in Al-Dawlat
al-Makkiyya. The first 'was that God's knowledge is distinct from
that of the Prophet. As he wrote:
One is the masdar or source, from where knowledge
emanates, and the other is dependent upon it. In the first
case, knowledge is zati, that is it is complete and independent
in itself. ... In the second case, it is ata'i, that is "gifted" by an
outside source. Zati knowledge is exclusively Allah's. ...The
second kind is peculiar to Allah's creatures. It is not for Allah.
(Al-Dawla al-Makkiyya, IS, 17, 19)
Having made this fundamental distinction between God's
knowledge and the Prophet's, Ahmad Riza then proceeded at
great length (the fatwa is approximately two hundred pages
long) to lav out the scope of the Prophet's knowledge of the
unseen. He began bv saving that some knowledge of the unseen
is possessed even by ordinary human beings : Muslims believe in
the resurrection of the dead, heaven and hell, and other unseen
things, as commanded by God. The knowledge possessed bv
prophets was of course much greater than that of ordinary
people, and although it was but a drop in the ocean compared
to what God knows, it was itself "like an ocean beyond count-
ing, for the prophets know, and can see, evervthing from the
First Dav until the Last Dav, all that has been and all that will be"
(Al-Dawlat al-Makkiyya, 57, 59).
^>
ch3.044 10/12/2004 5:17 PM Page 7
^
AHMAD RIZA KHAN: LIFE OF A MUSLIM SCHOLAR 75
As for the Prophet, his knowledge kept growing as the
Qur'an was revealed to him over a twenty-two-year period
(610—32 CE).Thus, Qur'anic passages that refer to his lack of
knowledge about something refer to a time when knowledge of
the particular matter still had not been revealed, and were
abrogated by later verses on that subject. By the end of his life,
however, God had told him about
the tumult of the resurrection (hashr o nashr), the accounting,
and the reward and punishment. So much so that he will see
everyone arriving at their proper places [at the end of times],
whether heaven or hell, or whatever else God may tell him.
Undoubtedly, the Prophet knows this much, thanks to God,
and God alone knows how much else besides. When He has
given his beloved [Muhammad] so much, then it is apparent
that knowledge of everything in the past and the future,
which is recorded in the Tablet (lawh-e mahfuz) is but a part of
his knowledge as a whole. (Al-Dawlat al-Makkiyja, 77)
The Prophet also knew what was going on inside people's
minds: "He knows the movement and glance of the evelid, the
fears and intentions of the heart, and whatever else exists"
(Al-Dawlat al-Makkijja, 90).
And, most controversially (for the Deobandis, among
others, denied this), the Prophet had knowledge of the five
things referred to in Qur'an 3 1 : 34:
Only God has the knowledge of the Hour.
He sends rain from the heavens,
and knows what is in the mothers' wombs.
No one knows what he will do on the morrow;
no one knows in what land he will die.
Surely God knows and is cognisant.
(31: 34, Ahmed 'Ali trans.)
Ahmad Riza argued that apart from the resurrection, the other
four things — knowledge of when it would rain, of the sex of a
^>
ch3.044 10/12/2004 5:17 PM Page 7f
76 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
yet unborn child, of what one would earn on the morrow, and
of the land where one would die — were not all that significant
in themselves. In fact, they were rather minor in scale of import-
ance compared to knowledge of the attributes of God, heaven
and hell, and the like. (In fact, Ahmad Riza argued, knowledge
of these five things had been given not only to the Prophet, but
also to Shaikh 'Abd al-Qadir Jilani, the qutb or "pivot" at the
head of the invisible hierarchy of saints on "whom the govern-
ment of the world depends.) The reason God had singled out
these five things for mention in the Qur'an was that the sooth-
sayers (kahins) of early seventh- centurv Arabia — the age of the
Prophet, when the Qur'an was revealed — believed thev could
predict such things. God "wanted them to know that these
things were "hidden" (al-ghayb) and that none could know them
but He and those He favored. The Prophet had been favored
with this knowledge (including the hour of the resurrection)
but had been commanded not to reveal it.
\7" Ahmad Riza cited two Qur'anic verses in defense of his ~x3~
views. They "were 3: 179, "nor will God reveal the secrets of the
Unknown. He chooses (for this) from His apostles whom He
will", and 72: 26— 27, "He is the knower of the Unknown, and
He does not divulge His secret to any one other than an apostle
He has chosen" (Ahmed ' Ali trans.) .
In keeping with the sufi dimensions of Ahl-e Sunnat belief
and practice (discussed in the next chapter), Ahmad Riza also
held a number of related beliefs about the Prophet, some of
which are found in Shi'ism: that he "was God's beloved for
whom God had created the world, that Muhammad had been
created from Allah's light and therefore did not have a shadow,
and, most importantlv, that he mediated between God and the
Muslim believer in the here and now — one did not have to wait
for the last day and the resurrection for such mediation to
occur. Ahmad Riza's views about the Prophet's knowledge of
the unseen were in keeping with his overall perception of the
^>
ch3.044 10/12/2004 5:17 PM Page 7 7^
AHMAD RIZA KHAN: LIFE OF A MUSLIM SCHOLAR 77
Prophet as one who was uniquely endowed bv God. Also note-
worthy in this regard is the hierarchy of levels of knowledge
laid out in the above fatwa: after God, Muhammad's knowledge
was greatest, then followed the knowledge of various
prophets, that of the 'ulama and sufi shaikhs and pirs (Shaikh
' Abd al-Qadir Jilani foremost among these), and finallv, that of
ordinary believers.
In 1911, Ahmad Riza's translation of the Qur'an, entitled
Kanz al-Imanji Tarjuma al-Qur'an (Treasure of Faith relating to a
Translation of the Quran), was published in Muradabad, a
north Indian citv where some of his followers were based.
Although an English translation "was subsequently published bv
the Islamic World Mission in Britain, it has yet to receive schol-
arly attention.
POLITICAL ISSUES IN THE EARLY TEENS
AND TWENTIES
In the years leading up to World War I the Indian nationalist
movement united behind the British Crown by sending troops
all over the world to fight on behalf of the British, but with high
hopes that after the 'war was over the process of self-rule would
be speeded up. Into this mix were added fears on the part of the
Muslim leadership that they might not fare too well in demo-
cratic elections in a Hindu-dominated India, and that steps
needed to be taken to safeguard Indian Muslim interests. This
led a small group of Muslim leaders to form the All-India
Muslim League in 1906.
The 'ulama had to decide whether or not they should take a
political stand as "well, and if so, whether they should throw
their support behind the Indian National Congress, which was
the dominant nationalist party, or the Muslim League, or
^>
ch3.044 10/12/2004 5:17 PM Page 7£
78 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
whether thev should form a party — or parties — of their own.
And if they did form their own party, should they join with
Congress in anti-British agitation, or act independently? As
may be imagined, there were many different opinions among
them, expressed once again in fatawa, commentaries, and
other scholarly writings, not to mention oral debates and
speeches made during Friday prayers. Ahmad Riza's opinion
that there was no religious justification for Indian Muslims tak-
ing an anti-British stand was challenged by 'ulama from other
movements, "who accused him of being pro-British.
During the prewar years a number of Indian Muslims had
begun to organize around an international issue, that of helping
the Ottoman caliph, whose empire was in danger of complete
dismemberment by the Allies after the war. This pan-Islamic
movement was supported bv Indian Muslim leaders such as
Abu'l Kalam Azad (1888—1958), who owned and contributed
regularly to the influential Urdu journal Al-Hilal, and Maulana
'Abd ul-Bari Farangi Mahalli (1878-1926), who was involved
in efforts to raise money for Turkish relief from India. In 1913,
'Abd ul-Bari began an association called Societv of the Servants
of the Ka'ba (Anjuman-e Khuddam-e Ka'ba). Ahmad Riza's
support was sought, but he refused — not because he was
unsvmpathetic to the plight of the Turks or because he did not
want to protect the Ka'ba, but because he objected to the
composition of the Anjuman. Because it strove to be an
inclusive body, welcoming all Muslims, whether Shi'a, Ahl-e
Hadith, modernist, or other, Ahmad Riza refused to be associ-
ated with it. He did so on grounds similar to those he had
expressed against the Nadwa in the 1890s, namely, that he
could not support a body 'which included people he deemed
"bad" Muslims (bad-mazhab) or those who had "lost their way"
(gumrah), his terms for the groups mentioned above.
Although he 'was all in favor of helping the Turks financially,
Ahmad Riza believed that given the straitened circumstances of
^>
ch3.044 10/12/2004 5:17 PM Page 7?
AHMAD RIZA KHAN: LIFE OF A MUSLIM SCHOLAR 79
Indian Muslims there was not much that thev could do, and he
was critical of what he saw as the wasteful expenditure of
resources bv politically active 'ulama. In a 1913 fatwa he
expressed his svmpathv for the plight of the Turkish people,
quoting Qur'an 13: 11: "Verily God does not change the state
of a people till thev change it themselves" (Ahmed ' Ali trans.).
After suggesting that both the Turks and the Indian Muslims
would ultimately have to depend on their own resources rather
than external help, he went on to suggest that if every Muslim
donated a month's salarv, living for twelve months on eleven
months' earnings, they would be able to render the Turkish
Muslims substantial help.
In addition, he proposed a fourfold course of action aimed at
making the Indian Muslim community economically and polit-
ically self-sufficient: first, by boycotting the British Indian
courts (as he was to do in 1917) they would save money on
stamp duties and legal fees. Secondly, they should buv whatever
\7" goods they needed from fellow Muslims, thereby keeping —kzj~
money "within the Muslim communitv (and not allowing them-
selves to go into debt to Hindu moneylenders). Thirdly,
wealthy Muslims in large cities such as Bombay should open
interest-free banks for use bv Muslims. And finally, all Indian
Muslims should strengthen themselves bv acquiring the know-
ledge of their faith (Ahmad Riza Khan, 1913).
This is the onlv fatwa known to me in which Ahmad Riza
addressed himself to practical issues rather than religious
ones. It is interesting that he concentrated entirely on eco-
nomic self-sufficiency, and said nothing about political action.
To the end of his life he remained convinced that the Indian
Muslim communitv needed internal reform rather than
political independence. His reference to Hindus in this fatwa
is also revealing. In his view, political alliances forged "with
Hindus for the sake of overthrowing the British were mis-
placed.
^>
ch3.044 10/12/2004 5:17 PM Page 8(
80 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
Taking Ahmad Riza's cue, leaders of the Ahl-e Sunnat move-
ment formed their own associations and organizations address-
ing such issues as helping theTurks, instead of joining nationally
prominent ones such as the Anjuman. In fact, several other
Muslim groups formed associations of this kind in the teens and
twenties of the twentieth century. But fissures began to appear
in the Ahl-e Sunnat movement as a younger generation of
Ahl-e Sunnat 'ulama challenged his apolitical stance. I follow
this development in chapter S bv studying a debate on a matter
of religious ritual, the call to praver, which culminated in a
court case in 1917.
Not surprisingly, the politicization of the Muslims was
speeded up bv the war. The Khilafat movement, launched in
1919 to preserve the caliphate after the Ottoman defeat in
WorldWar I, was the first national movement in which Hindus
and Muslims struggled side bv side against the British in sup-
port of a specifically Muslim issue. By this time Mohandas
\7" K. Gandhi (known as Bapu ["father"] to his followers) had —kzj~
returned to India after many years in South Africa and had
assumed leadership of the Indian National Congress.
Determined to "work toward Hindu— Muslim unitv, he saw in
the khilafat issue an opportunity to bring the two sides
together. In 1920, the Muslim leadership reciprocated bv
urging Indian Muslims to join with the Indian National
Congress in its nationwide Noncooperation movement
(1920—2) to oust the British from India. The Noncooperation
movement involved everything from giving up British honors
(titles bestowed on eminent Indians, for example) to
boycotting British courts and schools and the nonpayment of
taxes.
On the Muslim side of the Khilafat movement were
leaders such as Maulana 'Abd ul-Bari, the 'Ali brothers
(Shaukat 'Ali and Muhammad 'Ali), Maulana Azad, Mufti
Kifavatullah, 'Abd ul-Majid Badavuni (a sufi disciple of
^>
ch3.044 10/12/2004 5:17 PM Page 81
AHMAD RIZA KHAN: LIFE OF A MUSLIM SCHOLAR 81
Maulana 'Abd ul-Muqtadir Badayuni), and a number of
Deobandi 'ulama, including Shabbir Ahmad 'Usmani and
Husain Ahmad Madani. In 1919 they had created the first
national political organization of 'ulama, namelv, the Jam'iyyat
al-'Ulama-e Hind (Society of the 'Ulama of India). Its goals
were at once pan-Islamic (protection of Arabia, particularly
the holy cities of Mecca and Medina) and national (the
promotion of Muslim Indian interests and pursuit of freedom
from British rule). Deeming the British rulers the greater
enemy, it was willing to cooperate with Hindus on the national
front.
Ahmad Riza, characteristically, opposed the Khilafat move-
ment. Part of his objection related to his insistence that the sul-
tan of Turkey could not claim the title of caliph as he was not
of Quravsh descent (there were other shar 'i conditions as well,
though this was the most important). The other had to do "with
his view that Muslims could not seek the cooperation of kajirs
\7" (unbelievers) in the pursuit of a religious (shar 'i) goal — a clear —kzj~
indication that he was looking at the Khilafat movement in reli-
gious rather than political terms.
HIJRAT MOVEMENT
In the late summer of 1920, Maulana 'Abd ul-Bari launched a
new movement, known as the Hijrat (Emigration) movement.
He issued a fatwa declaring that Muslims should abandon
British-ruled India and migrate to a neighboring Muslim terri-
tory. Hoping that thev could acquire land in Afghanistan, some
twentv thousand people — most of them Pathans from what is
today the Northwest Frontier Province in Pakistan, but also
peasants from the United Provinces and Sind — sold their pos-
sessions and marched toward Kabul. However, Amir
Amanullah Khan (r. 1919—30) had just come to power in
^>
ch3.044 10/12/2004 5:17 PM Page
82 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
Afghanistan in the previous vear, having launched a jihad
against the British (an event known to historv as the Third
Afghan War) with the help of Afghan religious leaders, to get
rid of British control of the country. Although defeated, he had
concluded a settlement with the war-wearv British that
accorded Afghanistan full independence, including control
over foreign affairs. Fearing the economic consequences of the
influx of so many people, Amanullah closed Afghanistan's fron-
tiers to the emigrants, forcing most of them —now destitute —
to go back to their homes.
This was the context for Ahmad Riza's fatwa, published in
the Rampur newspaper Dabdaba-e Sikandari in October 1920,
declaring that India was dar ul-hlam, or a land of peace, not
dar ul-harb, a land of "war. In fact the fatwa had originally been
written in the 1 880s, but it was as relevant as ever. He wrote:
In Hindustan . . . Muslims are free to openly observe the two
^~A 'ids, the azan, ... congregational prayer ... which are the signs ("\
of the shari'a, without opposition. Also the religious duties,
marriage ceremony, fosterage There are many such
matters among Muslims ... on which . . . the British
government also finds it necessary to seek fatawa from the
'ulama and act accordingly, whether the rulers be Zoroastrian
or Christian. ... In short, there is no doubt that Hindustan is
dar al-Islam. (Ahmad Riza Khan, 1 888-9)
Despite the anti-British sentiment among Indian Muslims at
this time, he continued to insist that the fundamental shar'i sta-
tus of the countrv had not changed. There was thus no justifica-
tion for either jihad or hijrat.
A flood of accusations of his pro-British svmpathies fol-
lowed, including an allegation that he had met with the
Lieutenant Governor of the United Provinces, Sir James
Meston, while in Nairn Tal, the hill retreat where he went in the
last few years of his life to observe the Ramadan fast. He also
^>
ch3.044 10/12/2004 5:17 PM Page 8:
AHMAD RIZA KHAN: LIFE OF A MUSLIM SCHOLAR 83
had to answer charges of lack of concern for the Turks and the
holy cities of Mecca and Medina.
AHMAD RIZA'S POPULARITY AMONG
CORE FOLLOWERS
While Ahmad Riza's views on national issues mav not have
enjoved widespread support outside the Ahl-e Sunnat
movement, he continued to be revered and loved bv his core
group of followers to the end of his life. An event in 1919 illus-
trated this clearlv. That year, he undertook a long journey by
train from Bareillv to Jabalpur, in central India, to perform the
dastar-bandi (tying of the turban) ceremony ("which marks the
end of a student's career, akin to a student's graduation cere-
monies), for one particular student, Burhan ul-Haqq Jabalpuri
\7" (d. 1 984) . Bv this time his health was poor, and the journev of "\7
about six hundred miles took two davs. He was greeted like
royalty not only at the Jabalpur station, but at smaller stations
along the way. People thronged to kiss and touch his feet, and
lined the streets on the "way to the station.
Once arrived there, Ahmad Riza was surrounded bv well-
wishers and distributed lavish presents to all and sundry, not
just to his hosts. Zafar ud-Din Bihari writes about everybody's
amazement at the money, gold ornaments, and clothes which
he had brought as gifts. In return, they gave nazar, a token gift
given to a sufi pir, and feasts throughout his one-month stay.
Bihari also reports that at a series of public meetings people
came forward to seek his pardon for sins of omission and com-
mission — some of them minor, such as shaving the beard or
dveing the hair black, both of which he disapproved of.
Spiritual matters of deeper import were discussed in private
sessions (Bihari, 1938: 56—57).
^>
ch3.044 10/12/2004 5:17 PM Page 84
84 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
PASSING ON THE LEADERSHIP
In the years before his death in 1 92 1 , Ahmad Riza made a series
of decisions about the leadership of the movement in the
future. Already in 1 9 1 S , as reported bv the Dabdaba-e Sikandari,
he had chosen his older son, Hamid Riza Khan (1 875— 1943), as
his sufi successor (sajjada nishin). After 1921, Hamid Riza
became the head of what came to be known as the Khanqah-e
' Alivva Rizwivva, the new sufi order named after Ahmad Riza.
Ahmad Riza's vounger son, Mustafa Riza Khan (1892—1981),
had been active in the Dar al-Ifta during the teens of the twen-
tieth century. In the twenties, he was involved in organizational
activities centered on defense of the Arab holv cities and rebut-
tal of the Arva Samaj. In addition, he was a scholar in his own
right and did a great deal to collect and publish his father's
works. In the 1930s, he started a second school in Bareillv,
which is still functioning today.
(") In 1921, Ahmad Riza passed on to both his sons (and a — C\-
nephew) the responsibilitv for writing fatawa. Responding to a
question whether India would ever gain its freedom from the
British, and if so how qadis and muftis would be appointed, he
told his audience that one day:
The country will definitely become free of English
domination. The government of this country will be
established on a popular basis. But there will be great
difficulty in appointing a qadi and a mufti on the basis of
Islamic shari'a law. ... I am today laying the foundation for this
[process] so that ... no difficulty will be experienced after
independence. (Rizwi, 198S: 20—21)
He then proceeded to appoint one of his close followers,
Amjad 'Ali 'Azami, as the qadi, and two others — Mustafa Riza
Khan and Burhan ul-Haqq Jabalpuri — as muftis to assist him.
This qadi would be the qadi for all India, he said. The fact that he
^>
ch3.044 10/12/2004 5:17 PM Page 8
^
AHMAD RIZA KHAN: LIFE OF A MUSLIM SCHOLAR 85
believed he was choosing an all-India qadi speaks to the way he
viewed the Ahl-e Sunnat movement, as part of the worldwide,
universal umma or communitv of Sunni Muslims. To his mind its
reach and status were pan-Islamic, not merely local. That these
arrangements were not in fact realized reflects the realitv on
the ground, in that the future of the Indian Muslim communitv
"was largely determined bv people and events far removed from
Bareillv. The Ahl-e Sunnat movement, though bv no means
absent during the momentous events of the 1930s and 1940s in
British India, was but a small part of a larger whole.
"0" "&
^>
ch3.044 10/12/2004 5:17 PM Page
O
"&
O
ch4.044 10/12/2004 5:19 PM Page 8y
B;
AHMAD RIZA KHAN'S
BELIEF SYSTEM AND
WORLDVIEW
i y the 1880s, Ahmad Riza had begun to establish an identity
'of his own as a mufti who wrote erudite works, including
dailv responsa (fatawa) in response to questions from Bareillv
Muslims and others in distant places, and as a sufi surrounded
bv a close group of disciples. His perspective was markedly
hierarchical. In the spiritual sphere, what mattered most was
"closeness" to God, just as in the scholarly one it had been the
amount of knowledge the person had. Bv both measures, the
Prophet came first, followed bv the founder of the Qadiri
order, and finally the sufi master to whom the individual
believer was linked through discipleship.
In his personal life, Ahmad Riza took pains to follow the
sunna (the "wav") of the Prophet down to the smallest detail. It
was because thev gave primacv to the Prophet in their lives that
Ahmad Riza and his group of followers referred to themselves
asthe"Ahl-e Sunnatwa Jama' at," or "devotees of the Prophet's
practice and the broad communitv." Ahmad Riza's biographer,
Zafar ud-Din Bihari (who was also part of his inner circle of
disciples) , gives us the following picture of Ahmad Riza:
He wouldn't put any book on top of a book of hadith
[traditions of the Prophet]. . . .When reading or writing, he
would draw his legs together, keeping his knees up. . . . He
87
O
ch4.044 10/12/2004 5:19 PM Page 8£
AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
never stretched his legs out in the direction of the qibla [the
direction of prayer in Mecca]. He offered all his daily prayers
in the mosque [not just the Friday noontime prayer, as
required by law] (Bihari, 1938: 28).
Elsewhere, Zafar ud-Din relates that when Ahmad Riza
entered the mosque, he did so with his right foot first, while
upon leaving it, he did so with his left foot. Even within the
mosque, he made sure he stepped up to the mihrab (the praver
niche) with his right foot first (Bihari, 1938: 177).
As should be clear from this, the dailv lives of the 'ulama
were governed by strict etiquette (adab) . Like Ahmad Riza, the
famous 'ulama of Farangi Mahall were always mindful of the
example of the Prophet. Maulana'Abd ur-Razzaq (1821—89),
for example, "is portrayed as following the Prophet in
almost every possible respect. When he drank water, he did so
in three gulps. When he ate, he did so sparingly. . . . And before
-(^y— he began he always said 'Bi'sm allah' " (Robinson, 2001: 83). — (^y-
Veneration of the Prophet also caused many 'ulama to be
verv respectful of sayyids, descendants of the Prophet: thus,
Maulana 'Inayat Ullah, one of the Farangi Mahall scholars,
"revered the Prophet's family, excusing a savyid hundreds of
rupees rent he owed for the sake of his ancestor. For the same
reason ... he even went so far as to always use the respectful 'ap'
rather than the usual 'turn' when he spoke to the sayyids
amongst his pupils" (Robinson, 2001: 84). Similarlv, when
Ahmad Riza discovered that a young man hired as household
help was a savvid, he forbade everyone in the house to ask him
to do anything, asking that thev take care of his needs instead.
Uncomfortable with all the attention, after a while the man left
of his own accord.
Ahmad Riza was not just a strict Sunni in the sense of imita-
tor of the Prophet's conduct, however, but also a sufi of the
Qadiri order.
^>
ch4.044 10/12/2004 5:19 PM Page
BELIEF SYSTEM AND WORLDVIEW 89
AHMAD RIZA AS A SUFI
Ahmad Riza became Shah Al-e Rasul's disciple (murid, lit.
seeker) in 1 877. He seems to have thought of the relationship
between master and disciple as unbreakable bv the disciple even
after the master's death, even though it had not necessarily been
close in his lifetime. That at least is how he treated the relation-
ship with his own master, Shah Al-e Rasul, who had died a mere
two years after it had been formed. As mentioned alreadv, Shah
Al-e Rasul's grandson, Nuri Mivan, took over as Ahmad Riza's
spiritual director (though technically they were sufi "brothers"
or pirbhai, being disciples of the samepir), and Ahmad Riza con-
tinued to pav his respects to his deceased master by commem-
orating his death every year at his home in Bareillv.
The reason the relationship with the pir was so important,
according to Ahmad Riza, was that the pir had a unique insight
into his disciple's mental frame of mind, and was alwavs on
(") hand to guide him: — C\-
Sayyid Ahmad Sijilmasi was going somewhere. Suddenly his
eyes lifted from the ground, and he saw a beautiful woman.
The glance had been inadvertent [and so no blame attached to
him]. But then he looked up again. This time he saw his pir
and teacher (murshid) , Sayyid . . . Abd al -Aziz Dabagh.
(Malfuzat, vol. 2, p. 45)
On the second occasion the pir had intervened to prevent Savvid
Ahmad Sijilmasi from looking — intentionally, this time — at a
"woman outside the circle of relatives with whom social intim-
acy was permitted, and possibly being led astray. Scrupulous
Muslims hold the very act of looking at an unrelated woman as
sinful because it enables impure thoughts to arise. The Muslim
standard is therefore more stringent than the Christian one. For
Christians, a sin is committed when the viewer is lustful, but not
before: "He who looks at a woman to lust after her has alreadv
^>
ch4.044 10/12/2004 5:19 PM Page 9C
90 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
committed adulterv with her in his heart." (Matthew, 5:28).
Therefore without a pir's guidance the believer was likely to fall
into error. Or, as Ahmad Riza put it elsewhere, "To try [to go
through life without a pir] is to embark on a dark road and be mis-
led along the wav bv Satan" (Ahmad Riza Khan, 1901: 9—1 1 ) .
However, such acts of dav-to-dav guidance were but a small
part of the pir's role in the disciple's life. The most important
reason whv a person should bind himself to a pir, Ahmad Riza
explained, was that pirs are intermediaries between the believer
and God in a chain of mediation that reaches from each pir to the
one preceding him, all the way to the Prophet and thence to
God. Hadith (prophetic traditions) proved, he said, that
there was a chain of intercession to God beginning with the
Prophet interceding with God Himself. At the next level, the
sufi masters (masha'ikh) would intercede with the Prophet on
behalf of their followers in all situations and circumstances,
including the grave (qabr). It would be foolish in the extreme,
\y therefore, not to bind oneself to a pir and thus ensure help in vJ
times of need (Ahmad Riza Khan, 1901: 12).
THE PERFECT PIR
The pir, in turn, should conform to four exacting standards:
he should be a Sunni Muslim of sound faith (sahih 'aqida),
should be a scholar ('alim) qualified to interpret the shari'a, his
chain of transmission (silsila) should reach back from him in an
unbroken line to the Prophet, and finallv, he should lead an
exemplarv personal life and not be guilty of transgressing the
shari'a (Maljuzat, vol. 2, p. 41).
If both master and disciple conformed to these high stand-
ards, the disciple would eventually attain a state of complete
absorption in his pir, a condition known as fanaji'l shaikh. Nuri
Mivan was cast as a perfect illustration of the model of/ana:
^>
ch4.044 10/12/2004 5:19 PM Page 91
BELIEF SYSTEM AND WORLD VIEW 91
[Nuri Miyan] loved and respected his [pir, Shah Ale Rasul];
indeed, he loved everyone who was associated with him, and
all the members of his family He followed his commands, he
presented himself before him at his court (darbar) , he sought
his company, he was completely absorbed in him. His face had
the same radiance [as Shah Ale Rasul], his personality had the
same stamp (hat), he walked with the same gait, when he
talked it was in the same tone. His clothes had the same
appearance, he dealt with others in the same way. In his
devotions and strivings, he followed the same path (maslak).
The times set apart for rest in the afternoon and sleep at night
were times when he went to him particularly, receiving from
him guidance in every matter and warning of every danger.
(Ghulam Shabbar Qadiri, 1968: 91)
CONTROVERSY ABOUT SUFI
INTERCESSION
I'
Belief in the intercession of saintly persons with Allah on behalf
of the ordinary believer is controversial in Sunni Islam. Indeed,
Muslim reformers have often spoken out against it on the
grounds that it is a form of: shirk or associationism and an accre-
tion to "pure" Islam . Year s before , Muhammad Isma 'il had writ-
ten against this very belief (and the practices that arise from it)
in his book Taqwiyat al-Iman, classifying it as the second of
three types of: shirk (see p. 32). Ahmad Riza, for his part, wrote
extensively in favor of such belief, declaring that Muhammad
Isma'il's position was contrary to the Qur'an, which gives the
prophets the power to intercede with God's "permission" (izn),
and that it detracted from the Prophet's power, which included
the ability to perform miracles.
For Ahmad Riza and the Ahl-e Sunnat movement, which saw
sufism as a necessary complement to the law, the intercession
of sufi masters and, ultimately, of the Prophet himself was
^>
ch4.044 10/12/2004 5:19 PM Page 92
92 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
crucial to the relationship between master and disciple, for the
living hope that the dead pir (here the ordinary dead are less
central than the holv, exalted dead) will intercede for them
both in the here and now and when they face Judgment Dav.
But the living can do something for the dead too : the pravers of
the living can increase the dead person's chances of a favorable
judgment on Judgment Dav through the concept of the trans-
fer of merit (isal-e sawab). Haji Imdad Ullah "Muhajir" Makki
(1817—99), one of the most famous sufis of the nineteenth cen-
tury — who belonged to the Chishti order and was respected bv
'ulama from a number of rival movements, including the Ahl-e
Sunnat — wrote in his book Faisla-e Haft Mas'ala (Solution to
Seven Problems) that the pravers of the living could help the
dead person answer the questions of the two angels Munkar
and Nakir correctly when thev visited the dead in the grave and
therebv ensure his or her ultimate entry into heaven.
The spiritual power or grace (baraka, barkat) of the pir is
\7" believed to be especially strong at his tomb, and indeed to grow —kzj~
over time. As Ewing writes:
[When a saint dies] his spirit is so powerful and so dominant
over the body that the body itself does not die or decay but is
merely hidden from the living. The baraka of the saint is not
dissipated at the saint's death. It is both transmitted to his
successors and remains at his tomb, which becomes a place of
pilgrimage for later followers. The pir does not actually die in
the ordinary sense of the term. He is "hidden," and overtime
he continues to develop spiritually, so that his baraka increases,
as does the importance of his shrine. (Ewing, 1 980: 29)
THE THREE CIRCLES OF DISCIPLESHIP
As Ewing points out, a pir's followers fall into three distinct
groups which can be visualized as a series of concentric circles.
^>
ch4.044 10/12/2004 5:19 PM Page 93
BELIEF SYSTEM AND WORLD VIEW 93
In the first, outermost circle are the large number of people
who come to the pir with evervdav problems to be solved, such
as curing an illness, ensuring the birth of a son, or answering a
request for an amulet to be worn for good luck. Ahmad Riza
would pass on all such people to his students, unless their prob-
lem had to do with sufism (Bihari, 1938: 68).
Within this outer circle was a smaller "inner circle" of fol-
lowers in whose training he took great interest. All were
known as khalifas (deputies) .They were divided into "ordinary"
( 'amm), the second group, and special (khass), the third group,
also the smallest. Some of Ahmad Riza's ordinarv khalifas went
on, in the 1920s, to become prominent leaders of the Ahl-e
Sunnat movement during the Khilafat and Indian nationalist
movements. He looked upon them as lieutenants or right-hand
men who could be counted upon to debate with an opponent,
run a newspaper or school (madrasa), and generally promote
the goals of the movement in their hometowns, but did not
\7" regard them as spiritual disciples. This relationship, Ahmad —kzj~
Riza said, ceased upon the death of the teacher. His relationship
with the khalifa-e khass, on the other hand, was of primarily
religious significance and was continuous, not ceasing with the
death of the teacher. Those in this small group experienced
Jana of the pir and saw themselves as tied to their master even
after he had died, as described above. Out of this select group
the pir would choose one as his successor (sajjada nishin).
Ahmad Riza chose his eldest son, Hamid Riza Khan — authoriz-
ing him, in November 1915, to continue the chain of sufi dis-
cipleship (silsila) named the silsila Rizwivva (from the "Riza" in
his name). The sajjada nishin also bore worldlv responsibilities
for the maintenance of properties and management of funds
(Ahmad Riza Khan, 1901 : 14). This ensured the continuity of
the sufi master's spiritual and worldlv network over time.
^>
ch4.044 10/12/2004 5:19 PM Page 94
94 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
SHAIKH 'ABD AL-QADIR JILANI AND THE
IMPORTANCE OF THE QADIRI ORDER
Ahmad Riza was affiliated to the Qadiri order (tariqa), one of the
three major sufi orders in nineteenth-century India (along with
the Chishti and Naqshbandi) . The Qadiri order was founded in
the twelfth century by Shaikh ' Abd al-Qadir, a native of the town
of Jilan in Iran, who later became a scholar and preacher in
Baghdad. His tomb in Baghdad is visited bv pilgrims from all
over the Muslim world, particularly from South Asia. To his fol-
lowers, he is a saint, an intercessor with God, and the occupant
of a place of honor in the hierarchy of saints "between this world
and the next, between the Creator and the created" (Padwick,
1996: 240). One of his most popular epithets is "Ghaus-e
A'zam," the "Greatest Helper." Qadiris regard him as the Qutb,
axis or pole of the invisible hierarchv of saints who rule the spir-
itual universe. This spiritual "government" is as follows:
Every ghaus has two ministers. The ghaus is known as Abd
Allah. The minister on the right is called 'Abd al-Rab, and the
one on the left is called 'Abd al-Malik. In this [spiritual]
world, the minister on the left is superior to the one on the
right, unlike in the worldly sultanate. The reason is that this is
the sultanate of the heart and the heart is on the left side.
Every ghaus [has a special relationship with] the Prophet.
(Malfuzat, vol. l,p. 102)
The first ghaus, Ahmad Riza said, was the Prophet. He was fol-
lowed by the first four caliphs (Abu Bakr, 'Umar, 'Uthman, and
'Ali), each of whom was first a minister of the left before he
became ghaus upon the death of the previous incumbent. They
were followed bv Hasan and Husain ('Ali's sons, the second and
third imams, respectively, in Shi'ism) . The line continued down
to 'Abd al-Qadir Jilani. He was last "great" ghaus (ghausiyat-e
kubra) . All who followed after him were deputies (na'ib) . In this
^>
ch4.044 10/12/2004 5:19 PM Page 9
^
BELIEF SYSTEM AND WORLDVIEW 95
chain of spiritual authority, the sources of spiritual knowledge
are united with those of shari'a knowledge — for the source of
the latter is none other than the Prophet, followed bv the first
four caliphs of Sunni Islam. This is a fitting image for one who,
like Ahmad Riza Khan, saw himself as embodying the path of
both shari'a and sufism (tariqa).
Shaikh 'Abd al-Qadir Jilani was also a relative of the
Prophet, being descended on his mother's side from Husain
('Ali's vounger son bv the Prophet's daughter Fatima) and on
his father's from Hasan ('Ali's older son bv Fatima). This is the
source of the epithet "Hasan al-Husain."This double genea-
logical connection mattered greatlv to Shaikh 'Abd al-Qadir 's
followers, for thev believed him to have inherited the spiritual
achievements of all his ancestors.
Ahmad Riza's views on Shaikh 'Abd al-Qadir are expressed
in several poems, some of which relate to his exalted status:
Except for divinity and prophethood
you encompass all perfections, O Ghaus.
Who is to know what your head looks like
as the eye level of other saints corresponds to the sole of
vour foot?
Or:
You are mufti or the shar', qazi of the community
and expert in the secrets of knowledge, 'Abd al-Qadir.
Or again:
Prophetic shower, 'Alawi season, pure garden
Beautiful flower, your fragrance is lovely.
Prophetic shade, 'Alawi constellation, pure station
Beautiful moon, vour radiance is lovelv.
' j j
Prophetic sun, 'Alawi mountain, pure quarry
Beautiful ruby, your brilliance is lovely.
(Ahmad Riza Khan, 1976: 234)
^>
ch4.044 10/12/2004 5:19 PM Page 9(
96 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
All the adjectives refer to specific persons, namely, Muhammad
("prophetic"), his cousin and son-in-law 'Ali ('"Alawi"), his
daughter Fatima ("pure"), and his grandsons Hasan ("beauti-
ful," the literal meaning of hasan) and Husain ("lovelv," husain
being the diminutive of hasan). These five figures, popularlv
svmbolized by the human hand in Shi'ism (the panj), are parti cu-
larlv holy to Shi'i Muslims.
This emphasis on Shi'i figures of authority in the poetry of a
religious leader who prided himself on his Sunni identity mav
seem odd to readers familiar with the Sunni— Shi'i divide in
Muslim historv. Ahmad Riza's own writings are on manv occa-
sions fiercelv anti- Shi'i in tone. Nevertheless, the sufi chains of
authority in all the South Asian orders — the Chishti and
Naqshbandi as well, though the Qadiri more emphatically so —
bring the two sides together bv their emphasis on genealogv.
LOVE OF THE PROPHET
Muhammad became an object of devotion early in Islamic his-
tory, perhaps as early as the eighth century, within a hundred
vears of the birth of Islam. It displaved itself, among other things,
in the birth of the concept of the Prophet's light (nur-e muham-
madi), the idea that Muhammad was created out of God's light
and that his creation preceded that of Adam and the world in gen-
eral. In the tenth century, the famous Baghdadi mystic al-Hallaj
(d. 922) wrote that the Prophet was the "cause and goal of cre-
ation." He supported his assertion bv quoting the hadith qudsi (a
hadith in which the Prophet reports a statement by God but
which does not form part of the Qur'an), that "If you had not
been, I would not have created the heavens." The idea of the
prophetic light (on which, see Schimmel, 197S: 215—16;
Schimmel, 1987) has been developed in both Sunni and Shi'i
mvsticism, though with an important difference. In Sunni Islam,
^>
ch4.044 10/12/2004 5:19 PM Page 9y
BELIEF SYSTEM AND WORLD VIEW 97
the prophetic light belonged to the Prophet alone, whereas in
Shi'ism it was inherited and carried forward by each of the twelve
Imams. Among Sunni mvstics, it eventually came to be connected
with the concept of "annihilation in the Prophet" (Janaji '1 rasul ) .
"The mystic no longer goes straight on his Path toward God: first
he has to experience annihilation in the spiritual guide, who func-
tions as the representative of the Prophet, then the ... 'annihila-
tion in the Prophet,' before he can hope to reach, if he ever does,
Jana Jl Allah [annihilation in Allah]" (Schimmel, 197S: 216).
Somewhat later, in the thirteenth century, the Spanish mvstic
Ibn al-'Arabi (d. 1240) developed the concept of Muhammad as
the Perfect Man (insan kamil) , "through whom His consciousness
is manifested to Himself. . . . [T]he created spirit of Muhammad is
... the medium through which ...the uncreated divine spirit
[expresses itself and] through which God becomes conscious of
Himself in creation" (Schimmel, 197S: 224).
Of the relationship between God and the Prophet, Ahmad
\7" Riza said: —kzj~
Only the Prophet can reach God without intermediaries. This
is why, on the Day of Resurrection, all the prophets, saints
(auliya), and 'ulama will gather in the Prophet's presence and
beg him to intercede for them with God. . . . The Prophet
cannot have an intermediary because he is perfect (kamil).
Perfection depends on existence (wujud) and the existence of
the world depends on the existence of the Prophet [which in
turn is dependent on the existence of God]. In short, faith in
the preeminence of the Prophet leads one to believe that only
God has existence, everything else is his shadow. (Ahmad Riza
Khan, Malfuzat, vol. 2, p. 58)
To those who argued that belief in the perfection of the Prophet
was contrary to belief in the Oneness of God (tawhid) , Ahmad
Riza replied that "everything comes from God," that only God
is intrinsic (zat) while everything else is extrinsic or depend-
ent. This said, however, God chose Muhammad as "His means
^>
ch4.044 10/12/2004 5:19 PM Page 9£
98 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
of bringing the extrinsic ( ghair) world to Him. . . . Muhammad
distributes what He gives. What is in the one is in the other."
And on Muhammad as God's light, he said:
God made Muhammad from His light before He made
anything else. Everything begins with the Prophet, even
existence (wujud). He was the first prophet, as God made him
before He made anything else, and he was the last as well,
being the final prophet. Being the first light, the sun and all
light originates from the Prophet. All the atoms, stones,
trees, and birds recognized Muhammad as prophet, as did
Gabriel, and the other prophets. (Bihari, 1938: 96—98)
Being made of light, the Prophet Muhammad had no shadow.
Ahmad Riza wrote in a fatwa, "Undoubtedlv the Prophet did
not have a shadow. This is clear from hadith, from the words of
the 'ulama, of the [founders of the four Sunni law schools], and
the learned" (Ahmad Riza Khan, 1405/ 1985:51-52). He cited
vy numerous hadith to prove the luminous qualitv of the Prophet's T7
face and bodv, to show that flies did not settle on his body, that
after he had ridden on the back of an animal, the animal did not
age any further, and so on. Such miracles associated with the
Prophet also have a long historv in popular literature through-
out the Muslim world.
Ahmad Riza wrote a number of eloquent verses about the
Prophet. One, entitled Karoron Durud (Millions of Blessings), is
well known in Pakistan today, and is recited on the Prophet's
birthdav:
I am tired, you are my sanctuary
I am bound, you are my refuge
My future is in your hands.
Upon you be millions of blessings.
My sins are limitless,
but you are forgiving and merciful
^>
ch4.044 10/12/2004 5:19 PM Page 9?
BELIEF SYSTEM AND WORLDVIEW 99
Forgive me my faults and offenses,
Upon you be millions of blessings.
I will call vou "Lord," for vou are the beloved of the Lord
There is no "yours" and "mine" between the beloved and the
lover.
And like poets all over the Muslim world, Ahmad Riza also cele-
brated the Prophet's Night Journev to Jerusalem in his poetrv:
You went as a bridegroom of light
on your head a chaplet of light
wedding clothes of light on your body.
(Ahmad Riza Khan, 1976: 9, 13)
The Prophet was a personal presence in Ahmad Riza's life.
When he went on his second pilgrimage in 1 90S— 6, he spent a
month in Medina, where the Prophet is buried. Ahmad Riza
was in Medina during the Prophet's birthday celebrations.
According to his own statement, he spent almost the entire
period at the Prophet's tomb ; he even met the 'ulama of Medina
there. He considered this the holiest place on earth, even sur-
passing the Ka'ba, as he wrote in the following verse:
O Pilgrims! Come to the tomb of the king of kings
You have seen the Ka'ba, now see the Ka'ba of the Ka'ba
(Ahmad Riza Khan, 1976: 96; Maljuzat, vol. 2, p. 47-48)
Ahmad Riza believed that the Prophet could help whoever he
wished, in whatever "way he saw fit, from his tomb. (He also had
the capacity to travel in spirit to other places.) While most Sunni
'ulama believe that the Prophet will intercede with God on
Judgment Dav for ordinarv Muslims, Ahmad Riza believed that
the Prophet's intercession is ongoing from the grave. (The
Prophet lives a life of sense and feeling while in his grave and
spends his time in devotional praver.) He mediates with God
everv dav; his abilitv to do so is not limited to Judgment Day.
Ahmad Riza had undertaken this second hajj particularly in the
^>
ch4.044 10/12/2004 5:19 PM Page 1C
100 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
hope of being blessed with a vision of the Prophet. And according
to Bihari, this did indeed occur after he had presented the
Prophet with a poem (ghazal) he had composed to him. In
Bihari's words, "His fortune (qismat) awoke [on the second night
of waiting]. His watchful, vigilant eves were blessed with the
presence of the Prophet" (Bihari, 1938: 43—44). He also reported
having seen the Prophet in a dream (Maljuzat, vol. 1 , p. 82—83) .
Ahmad Riza also expressed his love of the Prophet in small,
everyday acts. For instance, in all correspondence, fatawa, and
other writings he signed himself as 'Abd al-Mustafa, meaning
"Servant of the Chosen One," the latter being an epithet of the
Prophet.Andonone occasion he told a follower that if his heart
were to be broken into two pieces, one would be found to say,
"There is no God but Allah," and the other would say, "And
Muhammad is His Prophet" (Maljuzat, vol. 3, p. 67). Together,
the two phrases constitute the profession of faith for a Muslim.
SUFI RITUALS
In addition to daily acts of devotion to the sufi pir, Shaikh 'Abd
al-Qadir Jilani, and the Prophet, special rituals marked their
birth or deathdavs. It was a time when the community came
together, affirming not only their shared beliefs but also their
group identity. Some of the rituals were particular to them, not
being favored bv the other groups.
The ritual celebration of a pir's deathdav ( 'urs) "was frowned
upon bv 'ulama such as the Ahl-e Hadith whom Ahmad Riza
called "Wahhabi." Others, such as the Deobandis, held that it was
in order as long as the celebrations did not involve anv forbidden
activities such as singing, dancing, and the use of intoxicants.
Ahmad Riza would mark the occasion by recitation of the entire
Qur'an (khatma), poetry in praise of the Prophet (na't), and ser-
mons bv the 'ulama. He himself would deliver a sermon at the
^>
ch4.044 10/12/2004 5:19 PM Page 1C
BELIEF SYSTEM AND WORLD VIEW 101
mosque, speaking not only about Shah Al-e Rasul but also about
Shaikh 'Abd al-Qadir, the founder of the Qadiri order to which
he belonged, and the Prophet. The event would be reported in
Rampur's Urdu newspaper, the Dabdaba-e Sikandari.
It lasted anvwhere between four and six days. In 1 9 1 2 , a year
in which the Dabdaba-e Sikandari reported on an 'urs celebrating
Nuri Mivan on his death anniversary, it lasted five days and was
attended by four to five thousand people, some from distant
parts of the countrv (this was a much smaller turnout than the
usual twentv thousand, on account of confusion as to the dates
of the event). Apart from the Qur'an readings and recitation of
poetrv in praise of the Prophet, Nuri Mivan's 'urs featured the
viewing of prized relics (tabarrukat) such as ahair of the Prophet
or 'Ali's robe, which had come into the famih/'s possession.
These objects were also viewed fortv days after the pir's death,
when his successor (sajjada nishin) was formallv installed in a
ceremonv known as the dastar-bandi ("tving of the turban"). The
\7" symbolism of this and other rituals, it is fascinating to note, —kzj~
bears close similarities with ceremonies associated with royalty.
Ahmad Riza's veneration for Shaikh 'Abd al-Qadir was ritu-
ally expressed through the eating of consecrated food and the
drinking of consecrated water on the eleventh of everv month
(gyarahwin) in memory of his birthdate.This was done to the
accompaniment of certain pravers (durud ghausia) and the
recitation of the Qur'an while facing Baghdad (Bihari, 1938:
202—203). As with the celebration of the 'urs in memorv of
one's pir, the observance of gyarahwin was frowned upon bv
some 'ulama, including those of Deoband.
The Prophet's birth anniversary was the occasion for a big
joyous celebration every year (majlis-e milad or milad al-nabi) . It
was one of the few annual occasions when Ahmad Riza gave a
sermon at the mosque in Bareillv, addressing a large gathering
that overflowed the mosque's seating capacity (Bihari, 1938:
96—98). Like the other ritual occasions mentioned above — the
^>
ch4.044 10/12/2004 5:19 PM Page 1C
102 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
'urs for pirs or sufi masters and the gyarahwin for Shaikh 'Abel
al- Qadir Jilani — some ' ulama obj ected to the milad celebrations
on the grounds that it could lead to worship of the Prophet, and
hence shirk or association of partners with Allah. As Metcalf
reports, the 'ulama of Deoband tried to "avoid fixed holidays
like the maulud [milad] of the Prophet, the 'urs of the saints,"
and other feasts (Metcalf, 1982: 151). The Ahl-e Hadith were
even more disapproving than the Deobandi 'ulama. Not onlv
did thev prohibit the 'urs and gyarahwin, but they even "prohib-
ited all pilgrimage, even that to the grave of the Prophet at
Medina. ... In their emphasis on sweeping reform, thev under-
stood sufism itself, not just its excesses, to be a danger to true
religion" (Metcalf, 1982: 273-274).
However, not all were as willing to condemn such ritual cele-
brations. Haji Imdad Ullah, mentioned earlier, had addressed
the issue in his book Faisla-e Haft Mas'ala. In his view, the per-
missibility of the event depended on the intention of the par-
\7" ticipants. If a person equated the ritual with ibadat or worship, —kzj~
on a par with obligations such as ritual prayer (namaz) or the
fast during Ramadan, then it was reprehensible. However, if it
was seen as a means of honoring and respecting the Prophet, it
was acceptable (Faisla-e Haft Mas'ala, 50—76). Another contro-
versial issue had to do with the ceremony known as aiyam or
"standing up" during the milad. This was a point at which the
Prophet's birth was recalled during the sermon. Ahmad Riza
justified the act of standing up as a mark of respect for the
Prophet, and also quoted a scholar from Arabia who said that
the Prophet's spirit was present in the room at that time.
RELATIONSWITH OTHER MUSLIMS
Ahmad Riza's relations with the other Indian reform move-
ments are best understood with reference to his 1906 fatwa,
^>
ch4.044 10/12/2004 5:19 PM Page 10c-
BELIEF SYSTEM AND WORLD VIEW 103
Husam al-Haramain, written while in Mecca. In his Maljuzat,
Ahmad Riza explains that when he arrived in Mecca he found
that the judgment of unbelief was about to be passed on an
Indian scholar for having supported the argument that the
Prophet had knowledge of the unseen. He suggests that had it
not been for the presence of a Deobandi scholar, Maulana
Khalil Ahmad Ambethwi (a disciple of Maulana Rashid Ahmad
Gangohi) in Mecca, this judgment would not have been arrived
at. He therefore hastened to write a fatwa of his own to avert
the expected pronouncement of kufr (or takfir). As Ahmad Riza
said: "the Wahhabis had arrived before [me] , among them Khalil
Ahmad Ambethwi. ...Thev had obtained access to the minis-
ters of the kingdom, right up to the Sharif. And thev had raised
the issue of the [Prophet's] knowledge of the unseen" (Maljuzat,
vol. 2, p. 8).
Ahmad Riza was anxious to present his arguments to the
highest authorities in the Sunni Muslim world while he was
\7" there, for confirmation of these arguments bv the Meccan —kzj~
'ulama would bolster his standing at home while undermining
that of his opponents. The fatwa begins by describing the sorrv
state of Sunni Islam in India at the time :
The school (madhab) of the Ahl-e Sunnat is a stranger in India.
The darkness of dissension (Jltna) and trial is fearful; wicked-
ness is in the ascendancy; mischief has triumphed. ... It is
incumbent on [you] to help the religion and humiliate the
miscreants, if not by the sword, then at least by the pen.
(Husam: 9-10)
Later in the fatwa he makes the same point by citing a hadith in
which Abu Bakr, the first Sunni caliph, is said to have heard the
Prophet say that a time will come when things are so bad that a
person who was a Muslim in the morning will be a kajlr in the
evening, and vice versa. This is how bad things are in India, he
tells the Meccan 'ulama.
^>
ch4.044 10/12/2004 5:19 PM Page 1C
104 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
What do vou think of mv judgment, he asks them in urgent
tones:
Tell me clearly whether you think these leaders . . . are as I
have portrayed them in my commentary, and if so, whether
the judgment [of unbelief ] that I have passed on them is
appropriate, or whether, on the contrary, it is not permissible
to call them kafirs — even though they deny the fundamentals
of the faith (zaruriyat-e din), . . . areWahhabis, and . . . insult
Allah and the Prophet. (Husam: 10)
We must pause to consider two terms used in this passage.
First, what is meant bv "fundamentals of the faith," and second,
what exactly did Ahmad Riza mean when he called the people
he accused of unbelief "Wahhabis"?
The first term is easily explained, as it was the subject of pre-
vious fatawa bv Ahmad Riza which had dealt primarily with the
Nadwa. As he explained there, the fundamentals (or essentials)
Qj included beliefs based on clear verses (nusus) of the Qur' an (as — (^y-
against verses open to a variety of interpretations), on accepted
and "widely known hadith, and on the consensus (ijma) of the
Muslim community. Such beliefs include: the unitv of Allah,
the prophethood of Muhammad, heaven and hell, the delights
and punishments of the grave, the questioning of the dead, the
reckoning on the dav of judgment, belief in the prophets, in the
corporeal existence of the angels, including the Angel Gabriel
through whom Muhammad received the revelations contained
in the written Qur' an, in the jinn and Satan, and the occurrence
of miracles. All these beliefs were "articles of faith" or aqida, and
had to be accepted. As Friedmann comments with regard to
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, "Faith is . . . indivisible : even the rejec-
tion of one essential article places the person bevond the pale"
(Friedmann, 1989: 160). It is ironic that when this was
applied bv other Indian 'ulama to Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, he
"was judged an unbeliever. He is the first person so judged in
^>
ch4.044 10/12/2004 5:19 PM Page 10€-
BELIEF SYSTEM AND WORLD VIEW 105
Husam al-Haramain. Unlike the other people named in the
fatwa, however, he was not described as a"Wahhabi."
The term "Wahhabi" has been encountered in previous chap-
ters with reference to Indian 'ulama such as Muhammad Isma'il
and Savvid Ahmad Barelwi (leaders of the Tariqa-e
Muhammadivva in the 1 820s), for instance, or the Ahl-e Hadith
and Savvid Ahmad Khan (the founder of MAO College in
Aligarh). Ahmad Riza was not specificallv suggesting that the
'ulama he called Wahhabi had anv direct link with the nineteenth-
centurv Wahhabi movement in Arabia, though he did think that it
had influenced these Indian 'ulama. He used it as a general term
of abuse for anyone he deemed to be disrespectful of the Prophet.
In the rest of the fatwa, Ahmad Riza proceeded to name four
groups of Indian 'ulama and explain whv he considered the
leader of each group to be an unbeliever. The first, as noted
above, was Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, whose followers Ahmad Riza
calls the Ghulamivva (rather than Ahmadivva, as thev called
\7" themselves) , in a plav on words — the literal meaning of the word —kzj~
ghulam is "slave "though here it is probablv better understood as
"knave," as Ahmad Riza accused him of making a number of mis-
leading claims about himself (claims we examined in chapter 2) .
Reversing Ghulam Ahmad's claim that he was "like the Messiah"
(Jesus Christ), Ahmad Riza denigrated him as the Antichrist
(dajjal), inspired bv Satan. However, it was Ghulam Ahmad's
statement that he was a"shadowy" prophet that incensed Ahmad
Riza the most. His unbelief was said to be greater than that of
any of the other scholars named in the fatwa.
Ahmad Riza's second group consisted of "Wahhabis" who
believed that this world was only one out of seven, and that
there were prophets like Muhammad in the other six worlds as
well, making seven in all. He referred to this group by the
home-made term Wahhabiyya Amthaliyya , "likeness Wahhabis."
According to him, most of them held that the likenesses of
Muhammad were the last prophets in their respective worlds,
^>
ch4.044 10/12/2004 5:19 PM Page 1C
106 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
as Muhammad 'was in this one, but there 'were also some "who
denied it: in the other six worlds the "seal of the prophets"
(Arabic, khatim al-anbiya') would be someone else. Ahmad Riza
called these people, whom he found particularly offensive,
"seal Wahhabis." Ahmad Riza appears to have been referring to
debates about God's unlimited power which had been ongoing
since the early nineteenth century. In Taqwiyat al-Iman
(Strengthening the Faith) , Muhammad Isma'il had written:
In a twinkling, solely by pronouncing the word "Be!" [God]
can, if he like[s], create tens of millions of apostles, saints,
genii, and angels, of similar ranks with Gabriel and
Muhammad, or can produce a total subversion of the whole
universe, and supply its place with new creations.
(Mir Shahamat 'Ali trans. , 339)
Since that time, the Indian reformist 'ulama had been debating
among themselves whether this meant that there could hypo-
\j- thetically be other final prophets in the six other worlds they —kzj~
believed to exist apart from the one we know.
All three of the 'ulama Ahmad Riza described as leaders of
the "likeness" or "seal" Wahhabis were from Deoband. One
'alim was quoted as saving that the discerning among the
'ulama know that prophetic superiority is unrelated to being
either first or last in time. Ahmad Riza declared that they were
unbelievers because they had implicitly denied the finality of
the Prophet Muhammad, "which of course "was a "fundamental"
belief on which all Muslims agreed.
The third group (whom Ahmad Riza called the "Wahhabivva
Kadhdhabivva," "the lie Wahhabis,") also from Deoband, "were
said to believe that God can lie should He wish to. The leader of
these 'ulama was said to be Maulana Rashid Ahmad Gangohi,
the Deobandi'alim whose fatwa on pilgrimage we examined in
chapter 3. Bv saving that God can lie, Ahmad Riza said that
Rashid Ahmad was casting doubt on the verv profession of
^>
ch4.044 10/12/2004 5:19 PM Page 1C
BELIEF SYSTEM AND WORLD VIEW 107
faith, the shahada or kalima. The first part of the profession savs,
"There is no God but God," and belief in it is, once again, neces-
sary if one is to be considered a Muslim. Once again, Ahmad
Riza's discussion ignored the hypothetical nature of Gangohi's
statement, which was also about God's absolute power.
He called the last group the "Wahhabiyva Shavtaniyva", "the
Satanic Wahhabis." Allegedly led bv Rashid Ahmad Gangohi,
like the third group, thev were said to believe that Satan's
knowledge exceeded that of the Prophet and that the Prophet's
knowledge of the unseen was onlv partial. Rashid Ahmad was
said to have cited a controversial hadith to the effect that the
Prophet Muhammad did not even know what lay on the other
side of a wall, claiming that highlv respected authorities also
accepted it, which Ahmad Riza doubted. In support of his own
argument Ahmad Riza cited a Qur'an verse:
He is the knower of the Unknown,
and He does not divulge His secret to any one
Other than an apostle He has chosen.
(72: 26-27, Ahmed 'Ali trans.)
The suggestion that the Prophet Muhammad's superiority to
preceding prophets since the beginning of time was even hvpo-
theticallv denied, or that the finality of his prophethood was
being denied, or that his knowledge of the unseen was not
acknowledged led Ahmad Riza to declare that the 'ulama con-
cerned were kajlrs and apostates (murtadd) from Islam.
THE ACCUSATIONS OF UNBELIEF
This accusation was not lightly made. In earlier fatawa on
Muhammad Isma'il and his statements in Taqwiyat al-Imam, for
example, Ahmad Riza had cited seventv different grounds for
declaring Muhammad Isma'il to be an unbeliever, but had not
^>
ch4.044 10/12/2004 5:19 PM Page 1C
108 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
in fact done so. He had believed it prudent to "restrain the
tongue" (kaff-e lisan) and had given Muhammad Isma'il the
benefit of the doubt, as he believed one should. In 1896, he had
written a fatwa in which he characterized a number of contem-
porary Muslim movements —from Savvid Ahmad Khan's mod-
ernist Aligarh movement, to the Ahl-e Hadith, Deoband, and
the Nadwa, not to mention the Shi 'a — as having "wrong" or
"bad" beliefs (bad-mazhab) and being "lost" (gumrah). These
people were misleading ordinarv Muslims, he said. In 1900, he
had sent this fatwa (most of which was against the Nadwa)
to certain Meccan 'ulama, asking them to confirm his opinions
(sixteen Meccan 'ulama had signed their assent to this fatwa).
But "with the exception of the Aligarh modernists (whom he
described as "kajirs and murtadds," he had stopped far short of
calling the other groups unbelievers, even though thev had, in
his view, denied the "essentials" of the faith (zaruriyat-e din) .
Much had changed bv 1906,apparentlv. In 1900 a number of
\7" his followers had declared him to be the Renewer (mujaddi d) of ~x3~
the fourteenth Islamic century. Not surprisingly, the claim was
not accepted bv rival movements who elevated their own
'ulama to the title. Perhaps this helps explain whv it was that
when Ahmad Riza went on pilgrimage in 1905—6, he was pre-
pared to write a fatwa against a small group of Deobandi
'ulama, as well as Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, naming them all as
unbelievers.
For the Ahl-e Sunnat, this effort was crowned with success
when twenty 'ulama from Mecca and thirteen from Medina
certified Husam al-Haramain, giving it their support. They
belonged to three different law schools, namely, the Hanafi,
Shafi'i, and Maliki. One of them (whose title was Shaikh
al-' Ulama) appears to have been a scholar of great standing in
Mecca. Khalil Ahmad Ambethwi, the Deobandi scholar who
had preceded Ahmad Riza to Mecca and had been trying to get
a fatwa declaring an Indian scholar to be an unbeliever because
^>
ch4.044 10/12/2004 5:19 PM Page 1C
BELIEF SYSTEM AND WORLD VIEW 109
of his belief in the Prophet's knowledge of the unseen, had to
leave Mecca two weeks after his arrival because, Metcalf savs,
some people "objected to his visit." Back in India, the
Deobandis got busy writing fatawa of their own responding to
Ahmad Riza "point bv point," leading to what Metcalf calls a
Jatwa war" (Metcalf, 1982:310).
RELATIONSWITH NON-MUSLIMS: HINDUS
AND THE BRITISH
With regard to Muslims' relations with Hindus, Ahmad Riza's
assessment was that the interests of Hindus and Muslims were
intrinsicallv opposed. He argued that the Muslim leaders of the
Khilafat (and Noncooperation) movements had lost their sense
of balance, as thev wanted to cut off relations with one set of
+ unbelievers, the British, while seeking close relations with
another, the Hindus. In religious terms, this was tantamount to
"pronouncing that which was indifferent (mubah; neither good
nor bad) to be forbidden (haram) , and that which was forbidden
to be an absolute duty (Jarz qati ' ) ." The Christians were at least
people of the book, whereas the Hindus were pagans.
In a 1920 fatwa about the Noncooperation movement (one
of his last), he argued that even in political terms it made no
sense for the Muslims to throw in their lot with the Hindus, for
whereas the British had refrained from interfering in Muslims'
internal (and religious) affairs, the Hindus had done the very
opposite. Here he cited the incidence of recent Hindu— Muslim
riots in the United Provinces, and Hindu refusal to allow the
sacrifice of cows during the 'Id festivities. Criticizing the
Muslim leadership bitterlv, he wrote:
What religion is this that goes from its [previously]
incomplete subservience to the Christians to completely
^>
ch4.044 10/12/2004 5:19 PM Page 1]
110 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
shunning them, and immerses itself wholly in following the
polytheists (mushrikin)? They [the Muslims] are running
from the rain only to enter a drainpipe. (Ahmad Riza Khan,
1920:94)
In the same fatwa, Ahmad Riza went on to argue that social rela-
tions (mu 'amalat) "with the British were permissible according
to the shari'a as long as unbelief or disobedience to the shari'a
were not promoted thereby. But the leaders of the Khilafat and
Noncooperation movements had prohibited such relations,
while simultaneously advocating intimacy with Hindus. If all
relations with the British were to be cut off, he argued, then
whv did the Muslim leaders continue to use the railways, the
telegraph, and the postal system, all of which benefited the
British Indian government's revenues?
Ahmad Riza was not alone among the 'ulama to make such
arguments on the basis of his interpretation of the sources.
According to I. H. Qureshi (1974: 270—271), some 'ulama of
Deoband were also opposed to the Noncooperation move-
ment, but such was the atmosphere in the countrv that their
voices were not heeded.
^>
ch5.044 10/12/2004 5:22 PM Page 1
^
AHL-E SUNNAT
INSTITUTIONS AND
SPREAD OFTHE
MOVEMENT BEYOND
BAREILLY
TheAhl-e Sunnat (or"Barelwi") movement began to take shape
in the 1 880s, and came into its own in the 1 890s in the context
of its anti-Nadwa campaign. Thereafter it grew steadily in
different parts of the country, as Ahmad Riza's followers them-
selves began schools, published journals, held oral disputa-
tions, and organized around specific issues in different parts of
the country. Being built around scholarly interpretation of the
Qur ' an and prophetic sunna together with sufi practice and rit-
ual, its participants also encouraged the kinds of annual calen-
drical observations described in chapter 4.
In this chapter I look at the organizational features of the
movement, and then turn to a divisive debate that split its mem-
bers along generational and political lines during Wo rid War I.
SEMINARIES (MADRASAS)
Unlike the Deobandis and the Nadwat al-'Ulama, the Ahl-e
Sunnat movement did not have a central Dar al-'Ulum at
^>
ch5.044 10/12/2004 5:22 PM Page 11
O
112 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
Bareillv or in any of the other small towns in the United
Provinces where they were influential, although thev did have
small-scale, relatively modest madrasas in Bareillv and else-
where. An important madrasa associated with the movement
later on was the Dar al-'Ulum Hizb al-Ahnaf in Lahore,
founded in 1924 by Sayyid Didar 'Ali Alwari (1856-1935),
who belonged to the Chishti (Nizami) order of sufis. He
counted Ahmad Riza as one of his teachers, having received a
certificate from him in jurisprudence (fiqh) and hadith, among
other things. Like all the other Ahl-e Sunnat madrasas, the Hizb
al-Ahnaf taught the Dars-i Nizami svllabus. Amplv supported
by financial contributions by Panjab-based pirs, it trained large
numbers ("hundreds of thousands," according to Sayyid Didar
'Ali's grandson) of 'ulama and teachers throughout Panjab.
Organized along the same lines as Deoband's Dar al-'Ulum, it
also had specialized departments of preaching (tabligh) and
debate. Preachers were needed both to counter the influence
\7" of rival Muslim movements (described in the Ahl-e Sunnat lit- —kzj~
erature as "Wahhabis") and the Arya Samaj. The Arya Samaj, a
Hindu reformist organization founded bv Swami Davanand in
the Panjab in the 1860s, had become a matter of concern for
Muslim reformers in the earlv twentieth century, on account of
its shuddhi or reconversion movement, that is, the effort to con-
vert Hindus who had converted to Islam back to Hinduism.
Debaters had a similar competitive function, namely, to
increase Ahl-e Sunnat influence and curtail that of its rivals.
A number of smaller Ahl-e Sunnat madrasas dotted the north
Indian plains: the Madrasa Manzar al-Islam in Bareillv founded
bv Ahmad Riza in 1904, and managed bv his brother and bv
Zafar ud-Din Bihari, was perpetually short of funds, particu-
larly during the war years (191 4—1 8) . In Badavun, the Madrasa
Shams al-'Ulum was founded in 1 899 , and fared well because of
a grant from the Nizam of Hyderabad (which lasted until 1948,
when Hyderabad was incorporated into independent India). It
^>
ch5.044 10/12/2004 5:22 PM Page lLc-
INSTITUTIONS AND SPREAD OF THE MOVEMENT 113
also received British support in the form of land and buildings.
This madrasa had a separate publications wing, and its graduates
went on to pass BA examinations in Urdu and Persian at
Panjab and Allahabad universities, earning the title of Maulawi
'Alim (Urdu) and Munshi Fazil (Persian). In Muradabad,
Ahmad Riza's close follower Na'im ud-Din Muradabadi
founded a school, the Madrasa Na'imivva, in the 1920s. Bv the
1930s it had become large enough to earn the title of Jam'ivva
(center of learning). It had a Dar al-Ifta (center for the writing
of fatawa) and handsome buildings. In the late 1 980s, I found it
in the heart of Muradabad, surrounded bv narrow lanes and
bustling commerce. The classrooms surrounded an open court-
vard, to one side of which was Na'im ud-Din's simple tomb.
These and countless other madrasas like them (many are
flourishing in the Pakistani cities of Karachi, Lahore, and else-
where todav) are "modern" in the sense that thev no longer fol-
low the one-to-one stvle of instruction practiced until the
\7" mid-nineteenth centurv, and also in that thev have annual —kzj~
examinations, classrooms, libraries, and all the other organiza-
tional features of regular public schools. But the svllabus is still
based on the Dars-i Nizami curriculum.
PRINTING PRESSES AND PUBLICATIONS
In the early nineteenth centurv, most printing presses in India
were owned bv Christian missionaries who used them to pub-
lish copies of the Bible in Indian languages and a few classical
Indian texts. Bv the 1 880s, however, the situation had changed
dramatically, as Indian-owned printing presses grew in number
and Indian-language publishing blossomed. In Bareillv, two
printing presses published most of Ahmad Riza Khan's fatawa
and other writings between them. They were the Hasani Press,
owned bv Ahmad Riza's brother Hasan Riza Khan (and later by
^>
ch5.044 10/12/2004 5:22 PM Page IV
114 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
his nephew Hasnain Riza Khan) , and the Matba' Ahl-e Sunnat wa
Jama'at, run bv Ahmad Riza's close follower Amjad'AliA'zami.
The earlier books published date from the late 1870s. Some
were only fifteen pages long, others had hundreds of pages, and
most fell somewhere in between. They had print runs of
between five hundred and a thousand copies, and popular titles
were sometimes reprinted as many as three times. For instance,
an anti-Deobandi fatwa on the need to respect graves (entitled
Ihlak al- Wahhabiyyin 'ala Tauhin Qubur al-Muslimin, or Ruin to the
Wahhabis for their Disrespect toward Muslim Graves) was first
published in 1904, and reprinted for the fourth time in 1928
with a print run of a thousand. Given the fact that books were
often read aloud (since there were many more people who
could not read than those who could), the reach of a single copy
"was much greater than is apparent from the numbers.
Much care was expended in finding an appropriate title, the
beginning and end of which not onlv rhvmed but also poked fun
\7" at the opponent. For example, in 1896 Hasan Riza Khan, the —kzj~
owner of the Hasani Press, wrote an anti-Nadwa work entitled
Nadwe ka Tija — Rudad-e Som ka Natija (The Nadwa's Tija —The
Result of Its Third Report). The word tija means the third dav
after a person's death. Thus, Hasan Riza implied that the
Nadwa's third report showed that the Nadwa was dead as an
institution. (Ahmad Riza alone wrote more than two hundred
fatawa against the Nadwa.) Furthermore, the numerical value
of the individual letters (in accordance with the abjad svstem,
which assigns each letter of the Arabic alphabet a number)
vielded the date of the work when added together.
Journals were another category of publication. In Patna, Qazi
'Abd ul-Wahid Azimabadi, a close follower, started publishing a
monthly journal, the Tuhfa-e Hanajiyya (Hanafi Gift) in 1897—8,
with the primary purpose of rebutting the Nadwa. It carried art-
icles about tenets of the faith, jurisprudence, hadith, stories about
the prophets and the first caliphs, and reports about rival 'ulama
^>
ch5.044 10/12/2004 5:22 PM Page 1L£-
INSTITUTIONS AND SPREAD OF THE MOVEMENT 115
organizations, particularly the Nadwa. It had a small circulation
(of two hundred to two hundred and fifty), its subscribers being
the educated elite (ru 'asa, sing, ra'is) of towns in Bihar, the United
Provinces, Bombav, Ahmadabad, and Hyderabad.
Newspapers constituted vet another kind of Ahl-e Sunnat
publication. Here I am thinking particularly of the Rampur-
based Dabdaba-e Sikandari (in translation, Alexander 's [Awesome]
Majesty), which began weekly publication in the 1860s. I
examined issues dating from 1908 to 1917. The paper had a
pro-British perspective, which paralleled that of the Nawab of
Rampur (though it was privately owned by a scholar of the
Chishti (Sabiri) line of sufis; the nawab probably patronized the
paper, but he did not own it). In its international political
coverage, the Dabdaba reported on the war and other major
events in Europe, as well as national events in India (such as the
constitutional devolution of power to Indians in the early
twentieth centurv), particularly those of interest to Muslims.
\7" In addition, it devoted space to purely "religious" events, such —kzj~
as 'urs announcements, detailed reports on a divisive debate
within the Ahl-e Sunnat movement about the call to prayer (see
pp. 118—22), and, during Ramadan, the exact time of sunrise
and sunset as determined by the 'ulama. Starting in 1910,italso
devoted two full pages (out of sixteen) to fatawa by the Ahl-e
Sunnat 'ulama in answer to questions. Bv February 1 9 1 2 , it had
published two hundred such fatawa.
VOLUNTARY ASSOCIATIONS AND
ORAL DEBATES
Finallv, let us look at two other kinds of activities less depend-
ent on the written word, namely, voluntary associations and
oral debates, common to all the reform movements of the late
nineteenth centurv. The organizational structure of voluntarv
^>
ch5.044 10/12/2004 5:22 PM Page \\A-~
116 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
associations, like that of the madrasas, showed clear British
influence, in that each had office bearers, annual reports, fund-
raising committees, and so on. To quote Kenneth Jones on the
Arya Samaj, "Battles were fought, victories won, and defeats
suffered according to the proper forms of parliamentary pro-
cedure" between the rival "sabhas, samajes, clubs, anjumans,
and societies" which proliferated in this period (Jones, 1976:
318-319).
Thus in 1921, the Ahl-e Sunnat 'ulama formed an organiza-
tion called "Ansar al-Islam" (Helpers of Islam, the word
"Ansar" being a reference to the seventh-century helpers of the
Prophet at Medina) in order to raise money for the Ottomans
after their defeat at the hands of the Allies in World War I. It was
but one of several such Indian organizations, and was in compe-
tition with the Farangi Mahall-led (and much better known)
Anjuman-e Khuddam-e Ka'ba (Societv of the Servants of the
Ka'ba). Another organization, the Jama'at-e Riza-e Mustafa
\7" (Society Pleasing to the Prophet Muhammad), was formed -\^r
around 1924 in order to counter the conversion efforts of
the Arva Samaj .
Oral disputations (munazara) "were perhaps the oldest form
of contestation between rival groups, both Hindu and Muslim.
In the earlv nineteenth centurv, the contestation had been
between Christian missionaries on the one hand and Hindu or
Muslim learned men on the other. In the latter half of the cen-
tury, by contrast, the contestants were often adherents of the
same religion, challenging each other's version of reform. The
disputations "were highlv public events observed bv large num-
bers of onlookers, and thus they had the air of a fair (me/a). They
lasted several hours, sometimes several days. Although neither
side was ever won over, both usually left feeling thev had won.
Here is the description of a disputation between an Ahl-e
Sunnat contestant and a Deobandi one, from the Ahl-e Sunnat
perspective:
^>
ch5.044 10/12/2004 5:22 PM Page 11
8"
INSTITUTIONS AND SPREAD OF THE MOVEMENT 117
In 1 9 1 9-1 920, [Ahmad Riza] sent Hashmat 'All to debate
with [a Deobandi 'alim] at Haldwani Mandi, all bv himself.
He was only nineteen years old. He harassed his opponent
and silenced his argument [in defense of a Deobandi book] .
And on the question of the Prophet's knowledge of the unseen,
[the opponent] was left astounded. This was his first debate. . . .
After successfully defeating his opponent, he returned to
[Ahmad Riza, who] was very pleased with his report, embraced
him, and prayed for him. He gave him the name "the father of
success," as well as a turban and tunic, and five rupees. He also
said that henceforth [Hashmat ' Ali] would get five rupees every
month. . . . And, by the grace of Allah, [Ahmad Riza's] favor was
always with him, and he won a debate on every occasion.
(Mahbub 'Ali Khan, 1960: 7-8)
The following reports on a disputation between the Ahl-e
Sunnat and Swami Shraddhanand, leader of the Arva Samaj,
that never took place :
\J" When Shraddhanand began [the conversion movement], ^ J
Hazrat [Na'im ud-Din Muradabadi] invited him to a debate.
He accepted the invitation. Hazrat went to Delhi [to debate
with him]. He ran from there and came to Bareilly. Hazrat
went to Bareilly and challenged him to debate. He ran from
there and went to Lucknow. When Hazrat went to Lucknow,
he went to Patna. Hazrat followed him to Patna, but he went
to Calcutta. Hazrat went there too, and caught [up with] him.
He then clearly refused to debate. (Na'imi, 19S9: 9)
The point was made: Swami Shraddhanand knew he would lose
if he debated with Na'im ud-Din Muradabadi but could not
refuse the challenge thrown at him. The disputations had an
element of "social inversion," a term used by scholars who have
studied public theater to describe occasions when the normal
social etiquette observed between equals is dispensed with,
giving each partv license to insult the other. Occasionally, the
disputations led to violence.
^>
ch5.044 10/12/2004 5:22 PM Page 11,4
118 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
GENERATIONAL FISSURES IN
THE MOVEMENT
In January 1914, alongside news of impending war in Europe
and national events in British India, the Rampur newspaper
Dabdaba-e Sikandari began to report a verv local story. The
issue, which had evidently been agitating the 'ulama of Bareillv
and a number of local country towns — all of whom identified
with the Ahl-e Sunnat movement — for some time before it
began to be reported in the paper, had to do with the Fridav
noontime praver, the most important of all the weeklv prayers.
The Fridav noontime prayer is distinguished bv the fact that
the call to it is sounded twice rather than once. The question
"was: should the muezzin, the one who issues the call, be stand-
ing inside the mosque or outside it when he makes the second
call? According to Ahmad Riza, he should be standing outside
the mosque, for this had been the practice since the time of the
-yy— Prophet and the first two caliphs. He cited a hadith from Abu —yy-
Daud in support of his view. Opposing him were 'ulama from
towns near Bareillv, such as Rampur, Pilibhit, and Badayun.
They argued that the second azan had been sounded from
within the mosque since the beginnings of Islam and that there
was no reason to change the practice now.
The space devoted to this dispute in the Dabdaba-e Sikandari
indicates that it had been brewing for some time. In January
1914, Ahmad Riza addressed a number of related questions:
what had been the precedent and model (sunnat) set by the
Prophet and his closest companions? What should be done
when the prevailing practice contravened this ideal? Should
people change their practice to conform to the ideal?
Ahmad Riza's response — that the current practice of sound-
ing the call from within the mosque was mere custom (rawaj)
and had no basis in either the Qur'an or the hadith, and that it
was the 'ulama's moral dutv to "revive a dead sunnat" — was
^>
ch5.044 10/12/2004 5:22 PM Page 11*
9"
INSTITUTIONS AND SPREAD OF THE MOVEMENT 119
followed bv a request that supporters of his view let the Dar
al-Ifta at Bareillv know. They were also asked to collect the
signatures of those who had decided to follow his lead, and to
send them on to the Dar al-Ifta.
Two weeks after Ahmad Riza's Januarv fatwa, his opponents
countered that the practice of sounding a second azan had not
existed during the Prophet's time.Thev said it had been started
by the third caliph, Caliph 'Uthman (r. 644—56) , and that it had
been done from within the mosque for thirteen hundred years:
far from reviving a dead sunnat, Ahmad Riza and his followers
were "kill[ing] a living sunnat. And far from getting a reward,
[thev] would be punished." Ahmad Riza Khan was basing his
view on his own independent reasoning (ijtihad), thev claimed;
it was the consensus of the communitv that ought to prevail,
not the opinion of a single scholar. Given that Ahmad Riza — like
the majority of Indian 'ulama — laid no claim to exercising
ijtihad, and that he believed firmlv in staving within the confines
\7" of the Hanafi law school, eschewing even the mixing of law —kzj~
schools after the fashion of Ashraf 'AliThanawi (see p. 70), this
was a particularly offensive charge.
In subsequent months the debate grew more heated as accus-
ations proliferated on both sides. Ahmad Riza argued that the
'ulama opposing him were misleading the people, "turning
their backs on religion [din] ," "slandering the shari' a," "follow-
ing a bid V rather than a sunna, and "committing a grave sin ."In
a later issue of the Dabdaba, he accused a particular scholar of
being influenced bv certain Deobandi 'ulama. A follower of
Ahmad Riza's offered a Deobandi scholar a fiftv-rupee prize if
he was able to satisfactorily answer a list of questions related to
the second azan. The debate was thus widening beyond the
original group of contestants.
In February 1915, Ahmad Riza successfully secured the
signatures of a small number of 'ulama from the Haramain
assenting to his point of view. One of the Medinan scholars
^>
ch5.044 10/12/2004 5:22 PM Page 12
120 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
wrote : "There is no advantage to giving the azan in the mosque .
Those people who are outside [are alerted by the azan that
thev] should strive after the remembrance of Allah." It was also
reported that pamphlets were now being written bv both sides.
The opponents now included 'ulama who considered them-
selves Ahl-e Sunnat as well as Deobandis, as some Ahl-e Sunnat
'ulama began to defect to the other side. The use of pamphlets
was also significant, as a pamphlet might reach more people
than either a fatwa or a newspaper. Being intended for a wider
audience than a small erudite circle of 'ulama, it might also be
written in a looser, more informal stvle. (On the other hand, it
must be admitted that fatawa were often published in the form
of little booklets or pamphlets for general circulation as well.)
The next stage in the debate was quite dramatic: sometime
in 1916 a court case was instituted against Ahmad Riza in
Badavun on a charge of libel. The details are unclear, but the
plaintiff charged that one of Ahmad Riza's pamphlets (entitled
\7" Sad al-Firar, A Hundred Flights [i.e., Defeats]) was libelous of ~x3~
Maulana 'Abd ul-Muqtadir Badavuni, "who had recently died.
This was a surprising development, because the latter came
from a familv with close ties with Ahmad Riza's own.
Moreover, Maulana 'Abd ul-Muqtadir had plaved a prominent
part at the 1900 meeting in Patna at which Ahmad Riza had
been proclaimed mujaddid, having initiated that proclamation.
In 1917 Ahmad Riza "was summoned to court, but failed to
appear. This was a clear indication that he did not acknowledge
the authority of the court. His reasons included the public set-
ting of a British Indian court, in "which British Indian law rather
than shari'a law was applied, and one in which the judge him-
self was usuallv a non-Muslim (in this case it was a Hindu) .
Some months later the judge dismissed the case, saving the
plaintiff had no grounds for his case. Ahmad Riza's supporters
interpreted this judgment as a victorv, and the event was cele-
brated with the group recitation of verses in praise of the
^>
ch5.044 10/12/2004 5:22 PM Page 1
^
INSTITUTIONS AND SPREAD OF THE MOVEMENT 121
Prophet (na 't) and victory processions in Bareillv. There ended
the "azan debate," as no appeal was filed. (Nevertheless, the
actual practice of calling the second azan from within rather
than outside the mosque did not change either.)
This debate shows us how the community, in the sense of the
people who actually interacted and took account of each other,
had become vastlv bigger than it used to be and now included
people who were linked bv newspapers and other modern
communications. It probablv started as an oral discussion in
Bareillv, then moved on to debate in the Rampur newspaper,
then widened further still when Ahmad Riza received approval
for his point of view from Mecca and Medina, and finallv moved
to a British Indian court where he was charged with libel. The
audience increased substantially after the Rampur paper began
reporting on it in 1914. The paper was probablv read bv the
literate Muslim classes throughout the modern state of Uttar
Pradesh — by 'ulama, landed gentrv, and urban professionals.
\7" These people, who had probablv heard of Ahmad Riza even if —kzj~
thev did not know of him personally, became part of a
"consuming public" — following Benedict Anderson's insights in
Imagined Communities — through their act of reading the paper.
It was characteristic of this public that it was anonymous,
unlike the initial group of people close to Ahmad Riza, whose
lovaltv he could count on. Public opinion had to be won over.
Presentation of validating opinions from Mecca and Medina
was important in the Indian context precisely because it could
be expected to carry weight outside the circle of people bound
to Ahmad Riza bv personal ties. In the final stage of debate, that
centered on the courtroom, the issue became even more pub-
lic and, for the first time, political as well, in the sense that the
authority of the colonial state was being pitted against that of a
traditional scholar.
The fissures in the Ahl-e Sunnat movement, evident at the
conclusion of the azan debate, were occurring at a time of
^>
ch5.044 10/12/2004 5:22 PM Page 12
122 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
enormous political change in British India. The politicization of
the Muslim community had begun even before World War I —
witness not onlv the organizational efforts of 'Abd ul-Bari
(see p. 78), but also the Kanpur mosque dispute and riot in
1 9 1 3 , in which the Sunni Muslims of Kanpur, a major city in the
United Provinces, angrilv protested against the demolition bv
the British Indian government of part of a mosque in order to
make "way for a road. The issues that arose after the war —
whether or not to join the Indian National Congress, or form a
joint partv of 'ulama from different movements, or abstain
from politics altogether — were to grow in urgencv after
Ahmad Riza's death in 1921 .The new leaders of the movement
adopted different solutions and led their followers in different
directions. While no single person "was able to unite the Ahl-e
Sunnat movement as Ahmad Riza had done, this "was perhaps a
sign of the success of the movement rather than the reverse,
illustrating its geographic spread and growth far beyond
\7" Bareillv, its original birthplace. —kzj~
ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPORTANCE
OF THE MOVEMENT IN RELATION TO
OTHER MOVEMENTS
There are no statistics to tell us which of the rival reform move-
ments of the late nineteenth and earlv twentieth centuries had
the most followers, particularly in the early twentieth centurv.
Most scholars believe that the Deobandis were influential in the
urban areas, while the "Barelwis," as the Ahl-e Sunnat are
widely known, "were popular in the countryside. If this were
true, it would make the Ahl-e Sunnat vastly more influential
than the Deobandis, and probablv the erudite Ahl-e Hadith as
well, not to mention the followers of Sayyid Ahmad Khan,
as the South Asian population was and continues to be
^>
ch5.044 10/12/2004 5:22 PM Page 12^~
INSTITUTIONS AND SPREAD OF THE MOVEMENT 123
overwhelmingly rural. However, this judgment arises from the
general identification of the "Barelwis" with sufism, and with
unreformed Islamic practice among the population at large.
But since we have no way of knowing whether Muslims who
prayed at the sufi shrines that are ubiquitous throughout South
Asia thought of themselves as "Barelwi," we cannot make this
assumption.
How we name things affects how we think about them.
Those who think of "Barelwis" think of a general sufi-oriented
group of people with a vast popular following. However, if we
keep the self-image of "Ahl-e Sunnat" before us, we see the
movement as more focused and less diffuse. In my view, we
have to start by looking at those who identified with the move-
ment by attending its schools, subscribing to and buving its
journals, attending its meetings, and participating in other
ways in the issues that engaged its leadership. In addition, con-
sidering that the people who did these things were part of the
\7" literate elite, by definition a small minority, we can assume that —kzj~
a larger number of people around them were influenced by
being read aloud to, and by constituting a silent audience that
attended and participated in events. Even when we add these
people in, the membership of the Ahl-e Sunnat movement
could not have exceeded thousands, perhaps tens of thousands,
particularly in the late nineteenth century.
Some examples will help put this in perspective. Thus,
as noted earlier in the discussion of Ahl-e Sunnat publications,
in the 1 890s a strong anti-Nadwa campaign was waged by a
follower of Ahmad Riza's in Patna, Bihar, through the journal
Tuhfa-e Hanajiyya (Hanafi Gift). Its circulation at its height
was about two hundred and fiftv. Most of its subscribers in its
early davs were from Bihar (72 out of 119), followed by the
United Provinces (23). Their professions included legal
representatives, revenue collectors, students, mosque leaders,
and school administrators, among others. Another example is
^>
ch5.044 10/12/2004 5:22 PM Page 12
124 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
provided by the printing history of an anti-Deobandi fatwa by
Ahmad Riza dealing with the Deobandis' alleged disrespect
for graves and gravesites (Ihlak al- Wahhabiyyin 'ala Tauhin Qubur
al-Muslimin, Ruin to the Wahhabis for Their Disrespect
toward Muslim Graves). It went through four printings
between 1904 and 1928; a thousand copies were printed in the
fourth printing (we have no numbers for the earlier editions) .
Given that Ahmad Riza Khan was less interested in schools
than were the Deobandis, the school network of the latter was
wider and more influential than that of the Ahl-e Sunnat.To cite
some rough numbers: the Madrasa Manzar al-Islam in Bareillv
graduated between four and ten students per year between
1 908 and 1917. Resources "were poor, with few teachers, class-
rooms, and inadequate library and boarding facilities. Schools
run bv Ahmad Riza's followers in other north Indian towns also
tended to be relativelv modest, though as indicated above they
increased steadily through the years. Bv comparison, bv 1900
\7" the Dar al-'Ulum at Deoband had about a dozen teachers and —kzj~
between two and three hundred students in a given vear, new
buildings, including classrooms and boarding facilities, and it
graduated about fifteen thousand students in its first hundred
vears (1867—1967). It also had a wide network of affiliated
schools, starting in 1866 with a school at Saharanpur, just north
of Deoband in the western part of the Northwestern
Provinces. Although its student numbers were small (about a
hundred), the network 'was constantly growing.
Numbers for other aspects of the two movements are hard
to specifv, though thev can be assumed to have been similar. In
general, the two were often paired as oppositional groups:
thus, "Deobandi— Barelwi" was a common term for sectarian-
ism within the Indian Muslim fold.
The Ahl-e Sunnat side gained additional strength from
another quarter, namelv, reformist sufi groups which sup-
ported them on specific issues. Reformist sufis (of the
^>
ch5.044 10/12/2004 5:22 PM Page 12^~
INSTITUTIONS AND SPREAD OF THE MOVEMENT 125
Naqshbandi and Chishti orders) were distinguished from the
vast populace bv their insistence on adherence to the shari'a
and a general concern for reform. In the Panjab, a state with
wealthv sufi hospices, such sufis had great influence. To cite an
example, Pir Mehr 'Ali Shah of Golra (18S6— 1937), a small
town in the Panjab, who was directlv associated with the Ahl-e
Sunnat movement, went to the Northwestern Provinces to
studv Qur'anic exegesis (tafsir) and hadith under reformist
'ulama, then returned to Golra to transform it into a reformist
Chishti center. Anti-British in his politics, he instructed his fol-
lowers to be personally observant and promoted knowledge of
religious law among his followers. He often issued fatawa on
points of religious law. His self-identification with the Ahl-e
Sunnat added to the influence of the movement in Panjab state.
To sum up, the reformist groups had different regional
emphases but more or less equal overall importance in the
countrv as a whole, parti cularlv in the Northwestern Provinces
\7" (renamed the United Provinces of Agra and Oudh in 1900). —kzj~
However, because the Deobandis emphasized schools more
than the Ahl-e Sunnat, in the long term thev had greater influ-
ence in the urban areas than the Ahl-e Sunnat.
^>
ch5.044 10/12/2004 5:22 PM Page 12
O
"&
O
ch6.044 10/12/2004 5:26 PM Page 12
AHMAD RIZA'S LEGACY
Ahmad Riza Khan, leader of the Ahl-e Sunnat or "Barelwi"
movement, was quintessentiallv South Asian. The movement
he led made universalist claims, as its very name makes
clear. Translated, the term Ahl-e Sunnat wa Jama'at means
"the devotees of the Prophet's practice and the broad com-
munity." It resonates with Sunni Muslims the world over, and
has been used in the past bv Sunni Muslim movements in dif-
-(^y— ferent historical contexts and geographical settings as a means (^J
of identifying their own communitv with that of the first
Muslims established by the Prophet in seventh-century Arabia.
It was Ahmad Riza's firm belief that he was following in the path
of the Prophet, and in everything he did and said he considered
the Prophet his model. To those who agreed, this made him,
Ahmad Riza, a model for emulation in his turn.
Ahmad Riza's interpretation of the sunna of the Prophet "was
informed bv ideas of hierarchy and religiositv derived from sufi
notions of "love" for the Prophet, and expressed itself in ritual
worship centered on sufi shrines and calendrical anniversaries
of sufi pirs, Shaikh 'Abd ul-Qadir Jilani, and, of course, the
Prophet's birthdav. It "was thus informed bv personal devotion
to a wide arrav of pious and holv ancestors. This was its hall-
mark and its source of strength. A warm, loving (and simultan-
eously demanding) relationship between each believer and
his or her pir lav at its heart. Such a relationship is particularly
127
^>
ch6.044 10/12/2004 5:26 PM Page 12
128 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
resonant in the South Asian context, for it mirrors similar ties
among other religious communities in the subcontinent, par-
ticularly Hindu followers of the bhakti tradition. Bhakti or devo-
tional "worship of God emphasized the individual believer's
relationship with a personal god (forms of Vishnu or Shiva).
"The devotee's . . . adoration "was often focused on the person of
a human guru or spiritual preceptor who "was revered as a liv-
ing manifestation of the god" (Bayly, 1989: 41). In fact, south
Indian sufi texts since the fifteenth century have frequently
interwoven Hindu and Muslim sufi motifs, enabling the
Muslim saint to "leap the boundaries between 'Hindu' and
'non-Hindu', 'Islamic' and 'un-Islamic' "(Bavlv, 1989: 120).
Critics of the Ahl-e Sunnat also claim that ritual practices dur-
ing the Prophet's birth celebrations (milad) resemble Hindu
worship practices. Indeed, despite some major differences
between the two traditions, such as the lack of images and of
priests in the Islamic context, there are many similarities: for
\7" instance, food and water offered to and consecrated by the —kzj~
saint, then consumed by the worshiper, the sprinkling of rose
petals in the sanctum, the recitation of religious texts and the
telling of exemplarv stories about the Prophet and the saints
are similar to Hindu worship practices.
Nevertheless, I take seriously the Ahl-e Sunnat claim to be a
reformist movement. While critics might argue that the Ahl-e
Sunnat were too accommodating of local practice, too local,
and too parochial to be considered "reformist" — unlike the
Deobandis or the Ahl-e Hadith or the Nadwa, for example — I
would argue that the Ahl-e Sunnat movement "was reformist in
the self-consciousness of its practice, and in its insistence on
following the sunna of the Prophet at all times. In paving atten-
tion to every detail of their comportment on a dailv basis,
members of the Ahl-e Sunnat were no different from followers
of rival movements at the time. What set them apart from the
other movements "was their interpretation of "what, in practice,
^>
ch6.044 10/12/2004 5:26 PM Page 12
AHMAD RIZA'S LEGACY 129
was entailed bv following the Prophet's example. While they
interpreted this in more customdaden terms than their rivals,
in their view thev never transgressed the boundaries of the
shari'a at any time.
While the Ahl-e Sunnat movement was certainlv more
inclined toward the emotional or magical than the Deobandi,
both shared a common wo rldview. Ahmad Riza was punctilious
about observing the sunna, as he interpreted it, in every detail
of his life, and taught his followers to do likewise. Frowning on
what he considered be-shar' (without shari'a) behavior, he
dressed, "walked, and conducted himself with others in ways
that conformed with what he took to be the shari'a. Public
events such as the milad and 'urs were also conducted within the
bounds of shari'a — without use of drugs and intoxicants and
qawwali singing (though the latter was allowed in small groups
by some 'ulama), and emphasizing Qur'an readings and the
recitation of poetrv in honor of the Prophet. Like the other
\7" reform movements, he and the Ahl-e Sunnat 'ulama in general —kzj~
also encouraged their followers to fulfill the five "pillars" of
Islam and to refrain from antisocial behavior of anv kind.
AHMAD RIZA'S 'URS IN INDIA
AND PAKISTAN
Since his death in 1921 , Ahmad Riza's 'urs has been celebrated
bv his followers every vear in Bareillv. In 1987,1 was in Bareillv
during the 'urs. Here is a transcription from my notes:
I attended one session of the three-day annual 'urs
celebrations for Ahmad Riza and his son Mustafa Riza.
Women are discouraged, though not prohibited, from going. I
was amazed at the size of the crowd. A newspaper report the
next day said that lakhs, or hundreds of thousands, of people
had attended. The program consisted of three days of
^>
ch6.044 10/12/2004 5:26 PM Page l:
130 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
speeches, interspersed with Qur'an readings and recitation of
na't poetry in praise of the Prophet.
The venue is a large open ground adjacent to the local
college, which suspends classes for the duration of the 'urs
and makes the classrooms available to people to sleep in at
night. So for three days the place is like a large camp, with
provision for food and shelter for some thousands of people. I
didn't get to see what went on in the khanqah itself, because
of the crowd. It is down in the heart of the city, accessed
through narrow lanes and alleys, and there was no way one
could force one's way through — my host and guide was most
reluctant to attempt it.
In Pakistan, I found that Ahmad Riza's death anniversary was
also commemorated with conferences at five -star hotels at
which speeches were made and na 't poetry recited. There are a
number of Pakistani organizations which sponsor events
honoring Ahmad Riza's life and work throughout the vear as
\7" well as publishing his books. One of the most prominent of ~X7~
these, called Idara-e Minhaj al-Quran, was headed bv a law
professor,Tahir ul-Qadiri, in the late 1 980s.Tahir ul-Qadiri 'was
a well-known public figure in Pakistan, as he made frequent
appearances on national television, delivered speeches at
mosques, and was active at conferences. At a more grassroots
level, the Ahl-e Sunnat were busv building schools (madrasas)
throughout the countrv. Zaman (2002: 235 n. 51) estimates
that the number of Ahl-e Sunnat schools went up from 93 in
1971 to 1,216 in 1994. The Ahl-e Sunnat are also represented
at the political level. Their partv is known as the Jamiyvat
al-'Ulama-e Pakistan (JUP) and its leader through the 1970s
and 1980s was a well-known 'alim and pir, Maulana Shah
Ahmad Nurani.
I should add, however, that the Ahl-e Sunnat in Pakistan
appear to be less prominent nationally than the Deobandis.
Their perspective on sufism being at odds with that of the Saudi
^>
ch6.044 10/12/2004 5:26 PM Page 1
^
AHMAD RIZA'S LEGACY 131
regime, thev have not benefited from Saudi munificence as have
other reformist groups (Zaman, 2002).
AHL-E SUNNAT/BARELWIS INTHE
DIASPORA
It is not only in Pakistan that the Ahl-e Sunnat are active.
They are 'well represented in other parts of the world as well,
chieflv Great Britain, where immigration from the subcontin-
ent has been sizeable since independence. The late 1960s
saw a transformation in the South Asian Muslim immigrant
population as a whole, as immigrants began to see themselves
for the first time as permanent settlers rather than temporary
migrants. As male workers were joined bv their families, the
need was felt for institutional structures — chieflv mosques
and schools — which would allow communitv life to flourish.
-(^y— Mv comments are limited to the Muslims of Bradford, a north- — t^y-
ern industrial citv representative in many "ways of the overall
picture.
In 1973, Pir Maroof, a prominent Ahl-e Sunnat leader,
founded the World Islamic Mission ( WIM) , "an umbrella organ-
ization for Barelwi dignitaries, with its head office located in
his mosque at Southfield Square in Bradford. ... Its first presi-
dent [was] Maulana Noorani" (Lewis, 1994: 83). As Lewis
explains, "the Wo rid Islamic Mission [was] clear lv intended as a
counterweight to the Mecca-based Muslim World League, a
vehicle for those whom Barelwis scornfullv dismiss as
Wahhabis, whether Deobandi, Jama'at-e Islami or Ahl-i
Hadith" (Lewis, 1994: 84). (The Jama'at-e Islami, founded bv
Maulana Mawdudi [d. 1979] in 1941, frowns upon sufi
practices of the kind favored bv the Ahl-e Sunnat.)
In 1989 the Muslims of Bradford were in the national —
indeed, international — spotlight following the publication of
^>
ch6.044 10/12/2004 5:26 PM Page l:
132 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
Salman Rushdie's book, The Satanic Verses. After an initial book-
burning protest which created the impression among Britons
that thev were religious "fundamentalists" without furthering
the British understanding of why they found the book offen-
sive, the Bradford Council for Mosques, an umbrella group that
included both Ahl-e Sunnat/ Bare Wis and Deobandis, tried to
make its case in other ways. In 1990 the Council opened a
"nationwide debate on the future of Muslims in [Britain]," and
invited the Bishop of Bradford, as well as Sikh and Hindu lead-
ers in the citv, to a dialogue, hoping to enlist their support in
their campaign against the book. As Lewis writes,
The emphasis of the conference was on the need for a
constructive engagement with the nation's institutions,
political, social, and educational. Muslim concerns were
articulated in an idiom accessible to the non-Muslim
majority. . . .There was a readiness to be self-critical. . . . Such
a conference was a tribute to the realism of the Bradford
Council for Mosques and a refusal to allow Muslims to
withdraw into sullen resentment. (Lewis, 1994: 164)
But this was not of course a response unique to the Ahl-e
Sunnat, who formed one group of manv in these events.
For all that, it is clear that the Ahl-e Sunnat movement is
thriving wherever there are South Asian Muslims. Todav it has
its own websites, as do its competitors, so that one can follow
the issues engaging its adherents at any time simply by search-
ing the WorldWide Web. At the present time, its greatest chal-
lenge appears to be to find common ground with other
reformist Muslim movements and to promote understanding
of its perspective among non-Muslims, whose lack of know-
ledge of the Muslim world leads them to see all Muslims as the
same, and in a negative light. In this dav and age, the need for
better understanding couldn't be greater.
^>
glossary. 044 10/12/2004 5:27 PM
133
GLOSSARY
'alim (pi. 'ulama) scholar of Islamic law
'amm (pl.'awamm) ordinary (in the plural, refers to
ordinary people)
azan call to praver
bid'a reprehensible innovation, opposite of sunna
dar ul-harb enemy territory; opposite of dar ul-hlam
dar ul-Islam land where Islamic law (shari a) is in force
dastar-bandi "tving of the turban," ceremony marking
the end of a person's studies or apprenticeship to a
sufi master
din the faith; opposite oidunja, the "world
\Z_j faqih jurisprudent, one who is knowledgeable in the law i^J
fatwa (pi. fatawa) legal opinion given by a mufti
hadith traditions or stories traced to the Prophet
hajj pilgrimage to Mecca, one of the five "pillars" of Islam
ijma consensus of scholars which constitutes one of the
sources of Islamic law
ijtihad independent inquirv to establish the legality of a
particular matter in shari 'a terms
jihad struggle, can be internal (spiritual) or external (against
an aggressor)
khalifa Caliph (during Ottoman rule); also a successor to a
sufi master
khass (pl.khawass) special, the opposite of 'amm
khutba sermon delivered by an 'alim at Fridav noontime
praver
madhhab legal tradition or school, of which there are four
among Sunni Muslims
133
O
glossary. 044 10/12/2004 5:27 PM Pa^-e 134
134 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
madrasa a religious academy, "where the Islamic sciences are
taught
manqulat the "copied" sciences, especially hadith
mansab/mansabdari a Mughal rank, or the holder of that
rank
ma'qulat the philosophical or rational sciences
milad celebration of the Prophet's birth anniversary
mujaddid Renewer of the shari 'a, expected at the start of
everv new Islamic century
na't poetry in praise of the Prophet
nawab a Mughal noble, or semi-independent Muslim ruler
during Mughal times
pir sufi master, one who has murids or disciples
qadi judge who applies Islamic law in a court
Sayyid descendant of the Prophet
shaikh "elder" or "leader," in South Asia a title often used of a
sufi master
~x^y— shari'a sacred law of Islam — (-_-/-
Shi'a/Shi'i followers of the Prophet's son-indaw'Ali, and
other Shi'i imams
shirk idolatry, associating partners with God
sufi Muslim mvstic
sunna the ""way" or "path" of the Prophet Muhammad, as
known to Muslims through the hadith literature
taqlid following one of the Sunni law schools in preference
to iitihad
tariqa sufi order
tawhid unity or oneness of God
'urs celebration of a saint's death anniversary
wahdat al-shuhud "unity of appearance," a sufi concept
wahdat al-wujud "unity of being," a contrasting idea
zakat mandatory alms-tax on accrued wealth
^>
glossary. 044 10/12/2004 5:27 PM P^cs. 135
MAJOR LANDMARKS IN
SOUTH ASIAN HISTORY
From the Eighteenth to the
Twentieth Century (to 1947)*
EIGHTEENTH CENTURY
1707 Aurangzeb dies in the Deccan.
1709 Nadir Shah and Ahmad Khan Abdali conquer Herat,
Kabul, Panjab.
1733 Bengal independent from Mughals.
1747 Durranis (Afghan dvnasty created bv Ahmad Khan
Abdali) conquer Delhi. Mughals under Awadh's
protection.
1757 East India Company becomes zamindar of 24 Parganas,
Bengal, after victory at the Battle of Plassev.
1765 British nawabi of Bengal and Bihar.
1772 Rohillas independent until 1792, then come under
Awadh's protection.
1773 Awadh becomes a native state under the British.
1 793 Permanent Settlement in Bengal .
* Adapted from David Ludden, India and South Asia: A Short History
(Oxford: Oneworld, 2002), pp. 111-112, 148-149, 198, and 212.
135
O
glossary. 044 10/12/2004 5:27 PM P^cs. 136
136 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
1798 Hyderabad becomes a native state under the British.
1799 British defeat Tipu Sultan of Mysore.
NINETEENTH CENTURY
1801 Madras Presidency formed. Rampur becomes a native
state in former Rohilkhand.
1803 British conquer Delhi and make it a dependency.
1804 Rohillas absorbed bv Awadh.
1818 Marathas conquered bv British , and their territory
forms the bulk of Bombay Presidency.
1835 Macaulay's Minute on Education. English becomes the
official language of government and the courts.
1857 The Revolt or "Mutiny" sweeps across north India.
C") Calcutta, Bombav, and Madras Universities founded. — C^X-
1858 India comes under Crown rule.
1867 Dar al-'Ulum founded at Deoband.
1875 Arva Samaj founded bv Swami Davanand.
Muhammadan Anglo-Oriental (MAO) College
founded in Aliparh bv Savvid Ahmad Khan.
o J J J
1885 Indian National Congress founded.
TWENTIETH CENTURY (TO 1947)
1905 Partition of Bengal. Anti-Partition protests.
1906 All-India Muslim League founded at Dhaka.
1911 Delhi Durbar; Bengal Partition revoked; capital
moved from Calcutta to Delhi.
^>
glossary. 044 10/12/2004 5:27 PM Pacts 137
MAJOR LANDMARKS IN SOUTH ASIAN HISTORY 137
1914 Gandhi returns to India from South Africa;
World War I starts; Indian troops sent overseas.
1919 Khilafat movement launched.
1920 Non-Cooperation movement; Hijrat movement to
Afghanistan.
1921 Dvarchv established.
1930 RoundTable conferences 1930 and 1932;
Salt Satvagraha.
1932 Second civil disobedience movement. Communal
Award. Gandhi's Poona Pact with B. R. Ambedkar.
1935 Government of India Act.
1937 Elections in India. Congress ministries formed in
seven provinces. Muslim League reorganized.
1939 WorldWar II starts. Congress ministries resign.
+ Muslim League declares "Deliverance Day."
"$" ^>
1940 Muslim League adopts Lahore Resolution stating goal
of creating Pakistan.
1941 Jama'at-e Islami founded bv Maulana Maududi.
1942 Quit India movement.
1943 Bengal famine (to 1 944) .
1946 Cabinet Mission; violence in Bengal; elections.
Muslim League wins Muslim-majority areas;
Lord Mountbatten comes to India as Vicerov.
j
1947 Independence for India and Pakistan; violence in
Panjab and Bengal; mass migration and massacre of
populations; Kashmir accedes to India.
^>
glossary. 044 10/12/2004 5:27 PM P^cs. 138
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Ahmad Khan, Muin ud-Din. History of the Fara'izi Movement in Bengal
(1 81 8-1 906). Karachi: Pakistan Historical Society, 1 965 .
Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin
and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso, 1983.
Bayly, Susan. Saints, Goddesses and Kings: Muslims and Christians in
South Indian Society, 1 700—1900. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1989.
Bihari, Zafar ud-Din. Hayat-eA 'la Hazrat.Vol. 1 . Karachi: Maktaba
Rizwiyya, 1938.
Cohn, Bernard S. Colonialism and Its Forms of Knowledge: The British in
, India. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996.
Cole,J.R.I. Rootsof North Indian Shi'ism in Iran and Iraq: Religion and
State in Awadh, 1 722-1839. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1989.
Denny, Frederick M. An Introduction to Islam. New York: Macmillan,
1985.
Ewing, Katherine. 1 980. "The Pir or Sufi Saint in Pakistani Islam."
PhD dissertation, University of Chicago.
Friedmann,Yohanan. Shaykh Ahmad Sirhindi: An Outline ofHisThought
and a Study of His Image in the Eyes of Posterity. Montreal: McGill-
Queen's University Press, 1971.
Prophecy Continuous: Aspects ofAhmadi ReligiousThought and Its
Medieval Background. Berkeley: University of California Press,
1989.
"Ahmadiyah," in The Oxford Encyclopedia ojthe Modern Islamic
World. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
Gilmartin, David. Empire and Islam: Punjab and the Making of Pakistan.
Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.
Hallaq, Wael. "Was the Gate of Ijtihad Closed?" International Journal
of Middle East Studies, 16, 1 984, pp. 3-41 .
138
O
glossary. 044 10/12/2004 5:27 PM Pa^-e 139
BIBLIOGRAPHY 139
Hardy, Peter. The Muslims ojBritish India. London: Cambridge
Universitv Press, 1972.
Hourani, Albert. Arabic Thought in the Liberal Age, 1 798—1 939.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, revised edition, 1983.
Imdad Ullah Makki, Haji. Faisla-e Haft Mas 'ala. Reprinted, with
commentary by Muhammad Khalil Khan Qadri Barkati
Marehrawi. Lahore: Farid Book Stall, 1406/1986.
Jones, Kenneth W. Arya Dharm: Hindu Consciousness in 19th-century
Punjab. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976.
Kopf, David. British Orientalism and the Bengal Renaissance:
The Dynamics of Indian Modernization, 1 773—1 835 . Berkeley:
University of California Press, 1 969.
Lelyveld, David. Aligarh's First Generation: Muslim Solidarity in British
India. Princeton: Princeton Universitv Press, 1978.
Lewis, Philip. Islamic Britain: Religion, Politics and Identity among
British Muslims. London: I.B.Tauris, 1994.
Ludden, David. India and South Asia: A Short History. Oxford:
Oneworld, 2002.
C^i Mahbub 'Ali Khan, Muhammad. BulandPaya Hayat-e Hashmat 'Ali. f"^\
Kanpur: Arakin-e Bazm-e Qadiri Rizwi, 1 960.
Masud, Muhammad Khalid. "Apostasy and Judicial Separation
in British India," in Islamic Legal Interpretation: Miiftis and Their
Fatwas, Muhammad Khalid Masud, Brinkley Messick, and David
S. Powers, eds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996.
Masud, Muhammad Khalid, Brinkley Messick, and David S.
Powers, eds. Islamic Legal Interpretation: Muftis and Their Fatwas.
Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996.
Metcalf, Barbara Daly. Islamic Revival in British India: Deoband,
1 860— 1900. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1982.
"Two Fatwas on Hajj in British India," in Islamic Legal
Interpretation: Muftis andTheir Fatwas, Muhammad Khalid Masud,
Brinkley Messick, and David S. Powers, eds. Cambridge:
Harvard University Press, 1996, pp. 184—192.
Metcalf, Barbara D. , and Thomas R . Metcalf. A Concise History of
India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
Metcalf, Thomas R. Ideologies of the Raj. The New Cambridge History of
^
glossary. 044 10/12/2004 5:27 PM P^cs. 140
140 AHMAD RIZA KHAN BARELWI
India, vol. III. 4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
reprint, 2001 .
Mir Shahamat 'Ali, trans. "Translation of theTakwivat-ul-Iman,
Preceded by a Notice of the Author Maulavi Isma'il Hajji."
journal of the Royal Asiatic Society , 13 (1852), pp. 310—372.
Mushir ul-Haqq, "Unniswin Sadi ke Hindustan ki Hai'at Shar'i: Shah
'Abd ul- 'Aziz ke Fatawa-e Dar al-Harb ka Ek 'IlmiTajzi'a."
Burhan, 63, 4 (October 1969), pp. 221-244.
Na'imi, Ghulam Mu'in ud-Din. "Tazkira al-Ma' ruf Hayat-e Sadr
al- Aiazil." Sawad-eA'zam, vol. 2. Lahore: Na'imi Dawakhana, 1959.
Padwick, Constance E. Muslim Devotions: A Study of Prayer-Manuals in
Common Use. Oxford: Oneworld, 1996.
Pearson, Harlan Otto. "Islamic Reform and Revival in Nineteenth
Century India: TheTariqah-i Muhammadiyah." PhD dissertation,
Department of History, Duke University, 1979.
Qadiri, MaulanaAulad-e Rasul. "Muhammad Mivan." Khandan-e
Barakat. Marehra: c. 1927.
Qadiri Nuri Badayuni, Ghulam Shabbar. Tazkira-e Nuri: Mufassal
r~~\ Halat o Sawanih-eAbu'l Hussain Nuri Miyan. La'ilpur: 1968. f"\
Qureshi, I. H. Ulema in Politics: A Study relating to the Political Activities
of the Ulema in the South Asian Subcontinent from 1556 to 1947.
Karachi: Ma'aref, 1974.
Rahman 'Ali, Maulawi. Tazkira-e 'Ulama-e Hind, trans. Muhammad
Ayub Qadiri. Karachi: Pakistan Historical Society, no. 16, 1961 .
Riza Khan, Ahmad. Al-Dawlat al-Makkiyya bi'l Madat al-Ghaibiyya.
Karachi: Maktaba Rizwiyya, n.d.
Dawam al- Aishjl'l Ummat min Quraish. Lahore: Farid Book
Stall, n.d.
Hada' iq-e Bakhshish . Karachi: Medina Publishing Company, 1976.
Husam al-Haramain 'ala Manhar al-Kufr wa'l Main. Lahore:
Maktaba Nabawiyya, 1405/1985.
77am al-A 'lam ba-an Hindustan Dar al-Islam. Bareilly: Hasani
Press, 1306/1888-9.
Al-Mahajjat al-Mu'tamanajl Ayat al-Mumtahana (1339/1 920) .
Reprinted in Kasai'il-e Rizwiyya, vol. 2, Lahore: Maktaba
Hamidiyya, 1976.
^>
glossary. 044 10/12/2004 5:27 PM P^cs. 141
BIBLIOGRAPHY 141
Maljuzat-e A 'la Hazrat. 4 vols. Gujarat, Pakistan: Fazl-e Nur
Academy, n.d.
Naqa al- Salajaji Ahkam al-Bai 'a wa'l Khilafa. Sialkot, Pakistan:
Maktaba Mihiriyya Rizwiyya, n.d. Originally published in
1319/1901.
Tadbir-e Falah wa Nijat wa Islah. Bareilly : Hasani Press,
1331/1913.
Riza Khan, Hasnain. Sirat-e 'Ala Hazrat. Karachi: Maktaba
Qasimiyya Barkatiyya, 1986.
Rizvi, S. A. A. A History of Siifsm in India.Vol. 2. Delhi: Munshi
Manoharlal, 1983.
Rizwi, Muhammad Hamid Siddiqi. Takzira-e Hazrat Burhan-e Millat.
Jabalpur: Astana 'Aliyya Rizwiyya Salamiyya Burhaniyya, 1 98S .
Robinson, Francis. The 'Ulama ofFarangi Mahall and Islamic Culture in
South Asia. Delhi: Permanent Black, 2001 .
Sanyal, Usha. "AreWahhabis Kafirs? Ahmad Riza Khan Barelwi and His
Sword of the Haramayn," in Islamic Legal Interpretation: Mirftis and
Their Fatwas, Muhammad Khalid Masud, Brinkley Messick, and
r~~\ David S. Powers, eds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996. f"\
Devotional Islam and Politics in British India: Ahmad Riza Khan
Barelwi and His Movement, 1870—1920. Delhi: Oxford University
Press, 1999.
"Generational Changes in the Leadership of the Ahl-e Sunnat
Movement in North India during the Twentieth Century." Modern
Asian Studies, 32, 3, 1998, pp. 63S-6S6.
Schimmel, Annemarie. Mystical Dimensions of Islam. Chapel Hill:
University of North Carolina Press, 197S.
And Muhammad Is His Messenger: The Veneration of the Prophet in
Islamic Piety. Lahore: Vanguard, 1987.
Spear, Percival. A History of India .Vol. 2. Harmondsworth: Penguin,
1981.
Troll, Christian W. Sayyid Ahmad Khan: A Reinterpretation of Muslim
Theology. Delhi: Vikas, 1978.
Zaman, Muhammad Qasim. The Ulama in Contemporary Islam:
Custodians of Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press,
2002.
^>
i ndex. 044 10/12/2004 5:28 PM Page
INDEX
^>
'Abd ul-Bari Farangi Mahalli 78, 80,
81
'Abd ul-Haqq Khairabadi 55, 58-9, 60
'Abd ul-Majid Badayuni 80—1
'Abd ul-Muqtadir Badavuni 120
'Abd ul-Qadir Badavuni 61
'Abdal-Qadir Jilani Baghdadi 63, 76,
77
and Qadiri sufis 94—6
ritual to celebrate birthdav 101
'Abd ur-Rahim, Sheikh 22—3
'Abd ur-Razzaq, Maulana 88
'Abd al Wahhab, Muhammad ibn
21-2
'Abd ul-Walid Azimabadi, Qazi 114
AbuBakr 25,94, 103
administrators, training of 26—8, 44
Afghanistan 2,81-2
Agra 2, 125
Ahl-eHadith 28,37-9,46,69,100,
102, 108, 122
Ahl-e Sunnat
Dar al-Ifta 70-1 , 84
in diaspora 131—2
fissures in 118—22
help for Turks 80,81, 116
influence of 85, 122—5
madrasa 1 1 1-1 3, 1 24, 1 30
in Pakistan 1 30-1
publications of 64—5 , 1 1 3—1 5 ,
123^4
as reformist movement 12 8—9
and sufism 91
voluntary associations 1 1 5—1 6
Ahmad Ambethwi, Khalil 103, 108-9
Ahmad Khan Abdali 135
Ahmad Riza Khan 23,24
death anniversary 1 2 9—30
education and training 5 5—7
family 51—3
asmujaddid 64-6, 108, 120
primacy of Prophet 87-8,96-100,
127
stories of 57—60
Ahmadis 28,45-8
Akbar 1-3
AI-Dawlat al-Makkiyya 74—6
Al-Hilal 78
'All 25,94,95,96
'Ali Shah, Pir Mehr 125
Aligarh 44-5, 108, 136
Amanullah Khan, Amir 81—2
Amir Khan 31
Amjad 'Ali 'Azami 84, 1 14
angels 43, 104
Anjuman-e Khuddam-e Kaba {Society
of the Servants of the Ka'ba) 78,
116
Ansar al-Islam (Helpers of Islam) 116
anti-British Revolt, 1857 9, 53, 1 36
apostasy 37, 70
Arabic \ 3, 14,20,38
ArvaSamaj 46, 1 1 2, 1 1 6, 1 36
Ashraf 'Ali Thanawi 37,70,119
Aurangzeb 3,135
Awadh 4, 5,6,7,52,54, 125, 135,
136
Azad, Abu'lKalam 78,80
azan debate 1 1 8—2 1
Babur 1
Badavun, Madrasa Shams al- ' Ulum
'l 12-1 3
Baghdad 94
Bahadur Shah Zafar 9
Barelwi see Ahl-e Sunnat
Bareilly 51,53,84, 101, 122
madrasa in 84, 112, 124
MS for Ahmad Riza 129-30
Barkatiyva familv 62—3
Bayly, S. 128
Benares, Sanskrit College 15
Bengal 4,7,8, 34, 135, 136, 137
Fara'izi movement 33—4
Permanent Settlement of 9—1 1 , 34
Bengal Renaissance 1 7
O
142
O
i ndex. 044 10/12/2004 5:28 PM Page
INDEX 143
"O"
Bentinck, Lord William 12,16
bhakti 128
Bihar 8, 123, 135
Bihari, Zafar ud-Din 51,57,59,60,
65,71,83,87-8, 100, 112
Bombay 9
Elphinstone College 1 6
Bradford , Muslims in 131—2
British, Ahmad Riza's relations with
53,78,82, 110
British India x, xi, 7—10
attitudesto 28-9,32,39,43,45
bovcott of courts 15,34,79,80,
120
economic consequences of 9—1 2
and education 15-16,39-40
Burhan ul-Haqq Jabalpuri 84
Calcutta
Brahmo Samaj 1 7
College of Fort William 15—16
Hindu College 16
Madrasa 1 5
Chishtisufis 92,94,96,112,115,125
Christians 46,47,89, 109
Clive, Robert 8
Cole,]. 3,4
Cornwallis, Charles, 1st Marquis 10
Dabdaba-e Sikandari 101,115,118,
119, 121
Dar al-Ifta 70-1 ,84,113
Daral-'Ulum 35,44, 124, 136
Hizbal-Ahnaf 112
ofNadwa 39,45
Dars-i Nizami syllabus 26—7,40—1,
53,58, 113
dastar-bandi ceremony 83,101,
133
D
nd, Sv
112
ayanand, swarm
debate 112
see also oral disputation
Delhi 8, 135, 136, 137
College 1 5
legal status for Muslims in 29—30
Madrasa-i Rahimiyya 22,26,29,
31, 55
Deobandis 28,36-7,75,106,128,
129
azan debate 119, 120
Daral-'Ulum 35-6, 124
fatawaof 68, 69-70, 72, 108, 109
influence of 122, 125, 130
and Noncooperation movement
110
andsufism 36, 100, 102
discipleship 89—93
Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act
37
Doctrine of Lapse 9
dreams 61— 2 , 64
Dudhu Miyan 34
East India Company 1,4,5,6, 7—1 1 ,
12, 14,29,54, 135
education
British 12-13, 15-17
Muslim 44, 55—6; see also madrasa
Ellis, F. 16
English
as official language 16,136
in schools 40
Ewing, K. 92
Faizullah Khan 6-7,53,54
Faraizi movement 29 , 33 — 4
Farangi Mahall 26-8,54,59,88,116
fatawa 15,36,66-70
Shah 'Abd ul- Aziz 29-31
Deobandis 68,69-70,72,108,
109
fatawa of Ahmad Riza 58,65,70-3,
84,87
anti-Deobandi 124
Husam al-Haramain 103-4, 108
India being dar al-lslam 8 2
Noncooperation movement
109-10
on practical issues 79
on the Prophet 57, 74-6
publication of 71-2, 113, 114, 120
unbelief 107-8
Fatawa-e Kizwiyya 71—2
Fazl-e Haqq Khairabadi 55, 57, 59
Friedmann,Y. 45,46,47,48,104
Gandhi, M.K. 80, 137
ghaus 94
Ghulam Ahmad, Mirza 45-8, 104,
105
God 25,76
knowledge of 74, 75
Muhammad and 97—8
omnipotence of 56—7
Sayyid Ahmad Khan and 42—3
O
O
i ndex. 044 10/12/2004 5:28 PM Page
144 INDEX
"O"
Golra 125
hadith 20,23,24,38,43,67,90
Hafiz Kazim ' Ali Khan (great-grandfa-
ther) 52
Hafiz Rahmat Khan 5 , 6
Hakim Ajmal Khan 55
al-Hallaj 96
Hamid Riza Khan (son) 84,93
Hanafi school of law 23,24,108,119
Hanbali school of law 38,64,70
Hasan Riza Khan (brother) 113
Hasani Press 72, 113-14
Hasnain Riza (nephew - ) 5 3, 114
Hastings, Warren 6—7, 13, 53
Hijaz 73
Hijrat movement 81—3, 137
Hindus 2, 3, 17, 19,46
devotional worship 1 28
Muslim relationship with 79, 80,
81, 109-10
reformist organization 1 1 2
Hourani, A. 21-2
Husain Ahmad Madani 8 1
Husain bin Saleh 64
Husam al-Haramain 103-4,108
Hyderabad 112, 136
Ibnal-'Arabi 25,48
Ibn Taimiyya 38
Idara-e Minhaj al-Quran 1 30
ijma (consensus) 66, 119
ijtihad (independent reasoning) 23,
24,25,66,70, 119
ImdadUllahMakki 36,92,102
'InayatUllah 88
India
Ahmad Riza's death anniversary
129-30
independence 1 37
Mughal Empire 1—4
North Indian successor states 4—5
political issues in early 20th century
77-81
see also British India
Indian National Congress 41,77,80,
122,136
intercessions 32, 91—2, 99
interest 29-30,79
interpretation of law" 2 3^4-
Iran 4-5
Irshad Hussain Rampuri 58, 60
Islam 42
see also Shi'ism; Sunni Islam
Jama'at-e Islami 131, 137
Jama'at-e Riza-e Mustafa 116
Jamiyyatal-'Ulami-eHind 37,70,81
Jamiyvat al-' Ulama-e Pakistan (JUP)
130
Jesus Christ 46,47
jihad 30-1, 32-3, 133
Ghulam Ahmad and 46
jihadists 28-9
Wahhabi trials against 39
Jones, K. 116
Jones, Sir William 13-14, 15
journals 114-15, 123
Kanpur, mosque debate 1 22
Karoron Durud 98—9
khalifas 93
Khanqah-e 'Aliyya Rizwiyya 84
Khilafat movement 80-1 ,' 109, 1 37
knowledge of the unseen 74—6, 77,
103, 107
Kopf, D. 17
Lahore 3,112
Lahoris 48,49
law 13-15
interpretation of 23^4-
see also Sunni law schools
Lelyveld,D. 44
Lewis, P. 131, 132
logic 26,59,60
Lucknow 26,40, 52
Macaulay, T.B. 13, 14
educational policy 16, 136
Madras 8, 16, 136
madrasa 35, 1 34
of Ahl-e Sunnat 111-13
in Deoband 35—6
of Farangi Mahall 26—8
at Rampur 55, 57
reform of 40—1
Madrasa 'Aliyya 55, 57
Madrasa Hanafiyya 65
mahdi 46
Malfuzat 100, 103, 104
Maliki school of law 70,108
ma 'qulat (rational sciences) 24, 26, 55,
58,59
^>
^>
i ndex. 044 10/12/2004 5:28 PM Page
INDEX 145
"O"
manqulat (traditional sciences) 24, 58
Marathas 3,5,7, 136
Marehra 62
marriage 37, 70
remarriage of widows 32,36
Masud,M.K. 69-70
Matba' Ahl-e Sunnat wa Jama'at 114
Mecca 2,21,69, 121
Ahmad Riza's pilgrimages to 21,
32-3,63-4,73,99, 103
Medina 21,69,99, 121
Meston, Sir James 82
Metcalf, B.D. 11,24,25,28,30,31,
35,44,72, 102, 109
Metcalf, T. 11,13
milad 101-2, 128, 129
Mill, J. S. 12, 14
miracles 43, 51-2,98
muftis 14, 27, 66-8, 84
Mughal Empire 1—4
muhaddath 46,48
Muhammad, the Prophet x, 32, 48,
67,94
Ahmad Riza's devotion to 87—8,
96-100, 127
birthday celebrations 101—2, 128
fatwa on 74—6
God and 97-8
knowledge of unseen 74—6 , 77 ,
103, 107
light of 96-7,98
as model of behavior 19,20—1
prophethood of 48, 57, 87-8
Muhammad 'Ali 80
Muhammad Isma'il 31-2,42,105
Taqwiyat al-lmam 32, 56, 91, 106
as unbeliever 107—8
Muhammad Qasim Nanautawi 36
Muhammadan Anglo-Oriental (MAO)
College 44-5, 136
Muhammadan Educational Congress
42
mujaddid 33,49, 108, 134
Ahmad Riza as 64-6,108,120
Ghulam Ahmad as 46, 49
munazaras 116—17,121
Muradabad 77, 113
Muslim League 77,136,137
Mustafa Riza Khan (son) 72 , 84
Nadir Shah 3,4, 135
Nad wat al- ' Ulama 28,39-41,64-5
campaign against 108, 114, 115,
123
Na'imud-DinMuradabadi 113,117
Najd 73
Naqi 'Ali Khan (father) 53,58,
60,62
influence of 55, 56, 57
Naqshbandi sufis 94,96,125
Nizam ud-Din 26
Noncooperation movement 80,
109-10, 137
Nuri Miyan (Shah Abu'l Husain
Ahmad) 61,89,90-1, 101
opium trade 1 1
oral disputations 45—6, 1 1 6—1 7
Pakistan 2,41,81, 137
Ahmad Riza's death anniversary
celebrations 1 30—1
Panipat 3-4,22
Panjab 29,45, 112, 113, 125, 135
Patna 16,65, 123
penal code 14—15
Persian language 16,20,24,32,54
pilgrimage 36,68,102
pir
relationship with 89-91 , 92, 1 34
rituals on birth- and deathdays
100-1
Plassy, battle of 7,8
politicization of Muslim community
80,122
postal system 11—12
print technology 12,68
printing presses 1 1 3—1 5
prayer 36, 38,43
call to 118-21
preaching 112
prophecy 48
Prophet see Muhammad, the Prophet
Qadiri Nuri Badavuni, Ghulam
Shabbar 91
Qadiri sufis 63, 94-6
qadis 15,27,37,84-5, 134
Qadiyyanis 48—9
qiyas (analogical reasoning) 66
Qur'an 23,37-8,41,43,66,104
revelation of 76
translations of 20, 24, 77
Qureshi,I.H. 110
O
O
i ndex. 044 10/12/2004 5:28 PM Page
146 INDEX
"O"
Rampur state 6,7,53—5,136
nawabsof 7,52,53,58, 115
Rashid Ahmad Gangohi 36,68-70,
72, 103, 106-7
Raza Library 54,5
reform movements
18th century 19-22
19th century 28-49
religious obligations 19,21
rituals, sufi 100-2, 127
Riza ' Ali Khan (grandfather) 5 1 -2
Robinson, F. 4,26-7,54,59,88
Rohilkhand 5-7,53
Roy, Raja Ram Mohan 17,19
sanad 55-6, 63^4
Sanskrit 13, 14, 17, 19
Satan 104, 105, 107
The Satanic Verses (Rushdie) 132
Sayyid Ahmad Barelwi 28,31-3,105
Sayyid Ahmad Dahlan 63
Sayyid Ahmad Khan 29,41-5,105,
122
Sayyid Barkat Ullah 62
Sayyid Didar 'Ali Alwari 112
Sayyids 31,62,88
Schimmel, A. 96,97
Shafi'i school of law 70, 108
Shah 'Abd ul-Aziz 25,28,29-31
Shah 'Abd ul-Qadir 3 1
Shah Abu'l Husain Ahmad see Nuri
Miyan
Shah Ale Rasul 89,91
discipleship to 61—3,89
ritual on deathdav 1 00—1
Shah Ahmad Nurani 1 30
Shah Wali Ullah Dehlawi 22-5, 36,
38
Shaikh al-'Ulama 108
shari'a 19,31,95, 125, 129
Shari'at Ullah, Haji 33, 34
Sharif 'Ali 73
Sharif Husayn 73
al-Shatibi 67
Shaukat 'Ali 80
Shi'ism 4,5,7,76,96
attempts to reconcile with Sunnis
25, 39
and prophetic light 97
shirk 32,42,91, 102, 134
Shivaji 3
Shuja ud-Dawla 4,6,7
Spear, P. 5
spiritual authority 94—5
sufism x, 21,24-5,26, 31-2, 34,
102, 128
Ahl-e Sunnat and 12 3, 128
Deobandis and 36
and intercession 91—2
reformist 124—5
rejection of 21—2, 32, 38
sunna 87, 118, 129, 134
Sunni Islam 103,127
and Ahmadiyya 46
attempts to reconcile with Shi'ism
25,39
Mughals and 1
prophetic light 96—7
Sunni law schools 23,37—8,39
Tahir ul-Qadiri 130
taqlid (submission to authority) 70,
1 34
tawhid (unity of God) 21,25,32,97
textile industry 1 1 , 34
Third Afghan War 82
Tonk 52
Trevelvan, Charles 1 2—1 3
Troll, C.W. 42,43
Tuhfa-e Hanafiyya 64-5 ,114-15,123
Turks, support for 78,79,80,81,
116
'Umar 25, 103
unbelief 103, 104-9
universities 16, 136
United Kingdom, Ahl-e Sunnat in
131-2
Urdu 20, 32,54-5
\irs (deathdav celebrations) 89, 100—1
of Ahmad Riza 129-30
'Uthman 25, 103, 119
voluntary associations 115—16
Wahhabi movement 21-2,34,38,
39,69,73, 105
Wahhabis, movements designated bv
Ahmad Riza 105-7, 131
Welleslev, Richard, 1 st Marquis 15
World Islamic Mission 77,131
Yusuf 'Ali Khan 54
Zaman,M.Q. 14,27,37,41,130
zamindars 1
O
O
Live Music Archive
Librivox Free Audio
Metropolitan Museum
Cleveland Museum of Art
Internet Arcade
Console Living Room
Books to Borrow
Open Library
TV News
Understanding 9/11