An Example of "Boot-Strapping" In Applied Physics
By Patrick Bruskiewich
©PSCB2012
Abstract
In mathematical physics a number of specialized techniques are learned with the passage
of time, techniques which become part of an applied physicist's box of magic. One
technique is colloquially known as "Boot Strapping", by which a minimum of data can be
used to yield a maximum of results. Sometimes this involves taking a series of under
described equations (say a single equation in two unknowns), some additional good data
points and a technique to more fully analyze the problem.
In Geophysics there is a nice example of "Boot Strapping" in how one can estimate both
the speed of a "shot wave" in seismic imaging, and the depth of an interface or feature
within the earth. This practical seismic imaging example is well suited for a first year
physics course studying wave motion.
Rudiments of Seismic Imaging
Seismic imaging is a very well developed technology, which provides geophysicists an
opportunity to study the structure of the earth to a dozen or so kilometres deep and to
prospect for much needed resources.
Seismic imaging relies on ray tracing and model building. At its rudiments is a simple
model of a "shot" providing an acoustical wave that passes through an isotropic and
homogenous medium until the acoustical wave is reflected off an interface, and back to
an array of microphones on the earth's surface which records the time-signature of
acoustical wave (refer to Fig. 1: Acoustical Wave Passing through a Medium).
Consider a surface SS and an interface RR. A shot or explosion is set off at "shot point"
and an acoustical wave travels through the isotropic and homogenous medium at some
unknown speed v to an interface at some unknown depth h.
shntpnint
^^
Fig. 1: Acoustical Wave Passing through a Medium
The microphones Pi and P2 are located in a line at measured distances from the shot point
O where microphone Pq is located (refer to Fig. 2: Position of Microphones Pi and P2).
R R
^ Microphone Position
Fig. 2: Position of Microphones P ^ and P ?
The Microphone Pi is a distance Xi from the shot point O, while the microphone P2 is a
distance X 2 from O. The microphones Pi and P2 record the reflected acoustical wave at
times Ti and T2 (refer to Fig. 3: Time Signature of the Acoustic Wave).
Elementary Concept of Seismic Reflection
From this arrangement let us use the "Boot Strapping" technique to estimate the velocity
of the acoustical wave v, and the depth of the interface h.
By analogy, the reflection of an acoustical wave off the interface RR is similar to the
optics of viewing a reflection off a mirror. The image that we see in a mirror appears to
be behind the mirror, at an Imaginary Point O' a distance similar to that from which the
mirror is away from the viewer. From the standpoint of ray tracing, the seismic imaging
is similar.
We arrive at an arrangement that the Imaginary Point O' is a distance of 2 times the depth
h from the shot point (Refer to Fig. 3: The Imaginary Point O' in the Seismic Image).
— r O'lmaginary Paint
Fig. 3: The Imaginary Point O' in the Seismic Image
By inspection, it is evident that the time it takes for the acoustical wave to travel from O
to T and back to the Microphone Pi is the same time it takes for a wave to travel from the
Imaginary Point O' to Pi.
If the distance from the shot point O to Microphone Pi is Xi and the time it takes for the
wave to travel from the shot point O to Microphone Pi is Ti then by Pythagoras'
Theorem
(vT x f=Xf + (2h) 2
which is a single equation with two unknowns. Similarly for Microphone P2 is at X 2 we
have
,2 ,^9 /~ r \2
{vT 2 )=Xl + {2h)
With two measurements of time we have now two equations in two unknowns, v and h.
It always helps to have some data to work with. Let us say then that the seismic array has
gathered the following data
Microphone
Distance X in metres
Time T in seconds
PO
1.60
PI
1,000
1.649
P2
2,000
1.787
Table 1: Data collected at Microphones P0, PI and P2
We can take any pair of data points and solve first for the velocity of the seismic wave v
and then for the depth of the feature or interface h.
Algebraic Approach
Let us use the data for PO and PI . By inspection
(2hf =v% 2 =v 2 T l 2 -X
This leads to
2 X, IX,
2
which for our chosen data yields
v = 2508m/s
and a depth h of
h = 2006m
Geometric Approach
A second technique is to solve the problem geometrically. There is an angle i at the
imaginary image point that defines the angle Z PO O' PI.
By inspection the sin of this angle is
. . x
smz
vT
If we were to follow the wave front at the instant at which it emerged from the ground we
would have a similar triangle with an emergence angle i (refer to Fig. 4: The Emergence
Angle i).
PO
dx
PI
vdt
Fig. 4: The Emergence Angle i
This triangle is similar to the triangle in Fig. 3. By inspection we see that
. . vAT
sm/ =
AX
from which we determine that
X vAT , XfAX^
vT AX
2
V =
T
K ATj
which ultimately means that
X( AX\
v =
T
K ATj
Choose the midpoint between PI and P2. For this point
and
t = \{t 1+ t 2 )
We can now also measure a difference in time AT and a difference in distance AX from
the shot point O, that is
AT = T 2 -T l
and
AX = X 2 -X 1
If we combined these four simple expressions into the equation for the velocity v we find
that
] x]-x]
v = ■ '
Ti-T(
(which is what we would arrive at using the Algebraic Approach and points PI and P2).
Using the data for the microphones at PI and P2 we find that
v = 2515m/s
and a depth h of
h = 2012m
Conclusion
While this example is known by any geophysicist worth their weight in rock, it is
nonetheless a good practical example to introduce the "Boot Strapping" technique to
freshman physics students (while we have one equation with two unknowns, a little
ingenuity helped you to get around that limitation). This example is also good for
showing that algebraic and geometric techniques many times complement each other.
©PSCB2012