(navigation image)
Home American Libraries | Canadian Libraries | Universal Library | Community Texts | Project Gutenberg | Children's Library | Biodiversity Heritage Library | Additional Collections
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload
See other formats

Full text of "Chemical warfare / Burt Solomon."

Chemical Warfare 

Chemical warfare is commonly thought of as some strange 
new kind of warfare having it's origin In the first World 
War. While it is true that all the scientific advancements 
in chemical warfare have been made in and since the last war, 
it's history dates "back many year3 . 

Chemical warfare history goes back at least twenty- 
three hundred years when the city of Platea was besieged by 
the Spartans in 429 B.C. Pots of pitch, sulphur, and burning 
charcoal were placed against the walla of the city by the 
attackers in the hope that the irritating gases would haraas 
their foes. A century later a combination of pitch, sulphur, 
tow, granulated frankincense, and pine sawdust was used in 
the Peloponnesian war. This combination was known a3 Greek 
fire. The value of this Greek fire was recognized by Emperor 
Leo VI, who also advised throwing jars of quicklime on the 
enemy's ships to suffocate him. 

In 1284, in a war between Genoa and Pisa, missiles 
containing lime and other alkalies were used and were effect- 
ive in irritating the eyes of many of the Genoese so badly 
that they could not see. In 1456, in a battle between the 
Turks and the inhabitants of the beleagured city of Belgrade, 
the Christian victory was due completely to their crude 
chemical devices. The Turks were beating the Christian 
defenders and had almost succeeded in penetrating the walls 
of the city when suddenly at a prearranged plan the Christians 
began began hurling down upon the enemy bundles of burning 
sulphur steeped brush wood. The Tur^s perished by the thousands 
in the flame3 and fumeg and fled. 



In the Middle Ages gas stink bombs were known and used. 
The Chinese and Malay pirates had a form of chemical warfares 
in their 3tink pots. Gustavus Adolphus of Sweden in 1631 
learned how to use screening smokes and won several battles 
through their use. The value of screening 3mokes quickly 
became known and thereafter screening smokes were used 
fairly frequently. 

In the Crimean war the British conceived the Idea of 
using 3Ulphur fumes to subdue strongholds. The suggestion 
wag made by Lord Dundonald in I885. The suggestion was 
rejected on the score of its inhumanity. Lord Dundonald 's 
scheme was supposedly reviewed by German chemists and im- 
proved during the World War. 

The diplomats at the Hague convention realized the 
possibilities of chemical warfare and made a treaty limiting 
the use of chemical warfare agents. This treaty was signed 
by all the countries represented except the United states and 
Great Britain. 

In World War I poison gas was first used by the Germaas 
on April 22, 1915, notwithstanding the fact that they had 
signed the Hague treaty. The results were disasterous for 
the Allies who suffered some 20,000 casualties and retreated. 
So new and unaccountable was the first attack that the 
Germans had no inkling of it's success. It has been said 
that if the German High Command had known the real situation 
at the close of the first gas attack the outcome of the war 
would have been much different and the result much quicker. 
The Allies immediately had to cope with the situation and 
the race to develop chemical warfare started. The gas mask 
was quickly developed and then a succession of gases and 

implements such as mustard ga3 , phosgene, and the chemical 



mortar made their appearance before the end of the war. 

Chemical warfare has not yet been used in the present 
war extensively. Our own Chemical Warfare Service has been 
active in keeping up with all the advancements in chemical 
warfare and we may feel sure that if and when chemical 
warfare is used by the enemy we are prepared to retaliate.