(navigation image)
Home American Libraries | Canadian Libraries | Universal Library | Community Texts | Project Gutenberg | Children's Library | Biodiversity Heritage Library | Additional Collections
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload
See other formats

Full text of "George Hunt UNCED Earth Summit 1992/Cobden Clubs Papers/Aldous Huxley "The Ultimate Revolution"-The Final Revolution/The New Order of Barbarians"

Gmail - What is your impression? 



2/5/12 7:07 AM 



Gsail 



Benjamin Steigmann <blissentia@gmail.com> 



hyUOOgfe 



What is your impression? 

5 messages 



George Washington Hunt <geo.hunt70@gmail.com> 

To: blissentia <blissentia@gmail.com> 



Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 8:48 PM 



Hello! I haven't heard from you since I mailed the Cobden Clubs literature to you. What conclusions have you drawn 
about the papers? George Hunt 



blissentia <blissentia@gmail.com> 

To: George Washington Hunt <geo.hunt70@gmail.com> 



Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 9:34 PM 



Helps to corroborate much of the information I have researched. I will be posting it all around the net. Thank you very 
much. 

I wonder if you would mind being interviewed by Jan Irvin. He hosts a website called qnosticmedia.com 

He has interviewed Eustace Mullins, John Taylor Gatto, and many others. He has different religious ideas than you, 
but I hope that would not be a problem in getting this information out. 

Also, another correspondent of mine, Richard Andrew Grove, also thought your information was vital. His website is 
http://traqedyandhope.com/7paqe id=8 

I think he would especially like to do an interview. 

I showed Jan your video, and he thought it was very important. I sent him scanned copies of the documents. 

Jan's email address is jan(5)qnosticmedia.com 
Richard's email address is Richard(a)8thestate.com 

[Quoted text hidden] 



blissentia <blissentia@gmail.com> 

To: George Washington Hunt <geo.hunt70@gmail.com> 

Hello Mr. Hunt, 



Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 12:30 PM 



I have just heard the interview you did with Jan. It thought it was of very high quality, showing the depth of insight that 
can be established when two serious researchers meet minds. I just have one question. 

In the opening letter you gave me concerning the "Cobden Clubs" document, you stated that you "did not know if it is 
true or just a joke". Is this just because the content of the document is so disturbing that you don't want to believe it's 
veracity? Is this because you think that the people who attend these kind of meetings have enough of a depraved 
sense of humor that they would put out this kind of literature (even though it corresponds to other literature put out by 
their think tanks)? 

I would very much like to know what the woman who obtained the document told you about how she got it (e.g. - was 
this read to the group?, was it in the possession of just one recipient?, etc). 

I have scanned copies of the documents onto the computer, and posted them online. I will also post your response to 



https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=1401d62371&view=pt&search = inbox&th = 1351331d3 55dea57 



Page 1 of 2 



Cmail - What is your impression? 



2/5/12 7:07 AM 



this question. 

Thank you very much for your assistance. 

Ben 

[Quoted text hidden] 



George Washington Hunt <geo.hunt70@gmail.com> 

To: blissentia <blissentia@gmail.com> 



Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 10:43 PM 



Hi Ben! Good to hear from you. Sometimes literature is spread to embarrass or defame a person. This is what I 
meant by a "joke". Not a good choice of words I'll admit.. Maurice Strong was the convener of the 1992 pre-summit in 
Des Moines yet there were adverse references to him in the Cobden papers. In which case it would be a "joke" that 
he was the author and as well as a victim in the content. I'm rambling-too lates an hour. The gal who got the goods 
removed it from a table where it was available. No one could really stop her. She certainly had a lot of chutzpah. 
Take care. George Hunt 

[Quoted text hidden] 



blissentia <blissentia@gmail.com> 

To: George Washington Hunt <geo.hunt70@gmail.com> 

Thank you. 
- Ben 

[Quoted text hidden] 



Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 11:01 PM 



https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=1401d62371&view=pt&search = inbox&th = 1351331d3 55dea57 



Page 2 of 2 



January 10,2012 



To "Bliss" from George Hunt 

Dear "Bliss": Your efforts to spread "thebigbadbank.com" site to others is certainly apapreciated. I 
hope the enclosed confidential documents from the Des Moines Pre-UN Earth Summit meeting will 
help you and your email acquaintances to get a macro-look at where society may be headed. It doesn't 
read well for "the lesser races" as they call us. 

I believe that my work is directed by and for the Lord and I am following a path He has appointed for 
me; that is, to expose and attack evil. As you know, it's no simple task to convince people (who have 
been lied to since they could hear) that evil lurks in our world affairs and systems. It seems that more 
9/11 -type crises are ahead for America. I expect waves of brutal terrorist attacks on innocent U.S. 
citizens in shopping centers, etc. will finally awaken Americans that "something is wrong".— but by 
then it will be too late. 

The enclosed documents were removed from a "no public allowed" private insiders' meeting by a 
Christian lady who lives in Des Moines, Iowa. She had become an earlier follower of mine and we 
conspired together to pierce the "no public allowed" private meeting to learn what we could. She was 
great! When they tried to turn her away she insisted on allowing her to attend by demanding her civil 
rights to attend, etc. They relented, let her attend, and out she came from the meeting with the 
enclosed document. 

"Cobden Clubs" is mentioned as the originator of the document. They are a London "think tank" that 
honors the British Anglo-Saxon race system. The Cobdens have an ideal of Britain to rule the world. 
Cobden Clubs consolidated into a private British aristocratic think-tank when the public gentlemen's 
club dissolved in 1980. We do not know if the enclosed document is true or just a joke. The 
information does tie in with other research I have gleaned about England's confederacy with the 
Rothschild Dynasty and other power-elite Britishers. 

I sent a questioning letter (attached) to Representative Gearhardt. He was noted as the "Secretariat for 
World Order" according to the first page of the "Initiative for ECO-92 Earth Charter". He did not 
respond to my letter and I did not pursue the evidence any further. 

Thank you for your request for the documentation I used in the "Earth Summit 1 992" videotape. I 
hope you use it to your great advantage to expose the New World Order and promote Liberty in our 
wonderful Country.. 




fiGote/ 




'George W/Hunt 



A UNA Environment and Development Conference I 

to provide broad public debate and support for United Nations Earth Summit "92 






Midwest Public Hearing 
on Environment and Development 

i 

House Chambers, State Capitol 

Des Moines, Iowa 

September 22, 1991 

j£xmiiibF fjeparfmrttt 

M Sk IMC juhi Br III kHM « 1« Sn« » MM 

PROCLAMATION 

VHFKEAS A CRITICAL HEED EXISTS TO EDUCATE CITIZENS OF ALL 

W * RtH ' HATIUHSON StS TO CONSERVE EARTH'S RESOURCES AND 

PREVENT POLLUTION; AND 

WHEREAS. IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT HE CREATE STRATEGIES TOACMIEVE 

mtNM '- owlioHMENTALLY SOUND AHD SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 

PRACTICES ON PLANET EARTH; AND 

WHEREAS, THE UNITED NATIONS ASSOCIATION OF THIS STATE IS 

"""*" DEDICATE! TO RESEARCH AMD EDUCATION OH THJ UNITED 

NATIONS AMD GLOBAL ISSUES. INCLUDING PROTECTION OF OUR 

ENVIRONMENT; AND 

WHFRFAS THE UNITES NATIONS ASSOCIATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES, 

* wta - SSadS and iSii we sPflNsomiw a midwest region Public 

HEARIN6 I N COOPERATION WITH THE SECRETARIAT OF THE 
SsWlRIB] ^OMBf OM ENVIRONMENT MM 
DEVELOPMENT IUnCETJ). FOR THE PURPOSE OF "EAR INS 
CRAS5R00TS TESTIMONY ON ISSUES PERTAINING TO ENERGY. 
SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE AND INSTITUTIONS: AND 

WHEREAS TESTIMONY GIVEN AT THE URA-USA MIDWEST PUBLIC HEARING 

W0aS ' J, LL u FORMAREQ TO APPROPRIATE NATIONAL LEADERS WHO 

WU PREPArTthT U.S. NATIONAL REPWTTHAT JILL 

determine u.s. policy at the 1992 uhceb earth summit 
Inference to be Nelb in Brazil and attended by 159 

MEMBER nations: 

HCM. THEREFORE, 1, TERRY E. BRAHSTAB, GOVERNOR OF J* STATE OF 
i™— -™_ lQ ^^ ^ MHEBT PROCLAIM SUNDAV, SEPTEMBER 22. 

1991. AS 

SIISTtflllLE DEVELOPIIEHT DAY 

IH IOWA. AND URGE C1T1IEHS TO PARTICIPATE WITH THE UNITED NATIONS 
ASSOCIATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF HEARIHS TESTIMONY ON £»«'_._ 
SUSTAINABLE ASRICULTURE AND THE INSTITUTIONS NECESSARY TO PROTECT 
THE ENVIRONMENT IN lONA AND AROUND THE WORLD. 

IN TESTWOW WfflSDF. I HAVE HERE- 
UNTO SUBSCRIBED W NAME AND CAUSED 
THE GREAT SEAL OFTHE STATE OF lOHA 
TO BE AFFIXED. DONE AT DES MOINES 
THIS 27TH DAY OF AUGUST IN THE YEAR 
OF OUR LORD ONE THOUSAND NIK 
HUNDRED NINETY-ONE. 









k 'm\SkM~*^ 



SECRETARY OF ItAJf 



Sponsored by 
The United Nations Association of Iowa 




'COBDEN CLUBS 
September 20, 199 1 

INITIATIVE FOR ECO-92 EARTH CHARTER 



1. THE PRESSING NEED 

a. The time is pressing. The Club of Rome was founded in 1968, Limits 
to Growth was written in 1971, GLobal 2000 was written in 1979, but 
insufficient progress has been made in population reduction. 

b. Given global instabilities, including those in the former Soviet 
bloc, the need for firm control of world technology, weaponry, and natural 
resources, is now absolutely mandatory. The immediate reduction of world 
population, according to the mid-1970 1 s recommendations of the Draper Fund, 
must be immediately effected. 

c. The present vast overpopulation:, now far beyond the world carrying 
capacity, cannot be answered by future reductions in the birth rate due to 
contraception, sterilization, abortion, but must be met in the present by the 
reduction in the numbers presently existing. This must be done by whatever 

means necessary. .«.__• 

d. The issue is falsely debated between a political and a cultural 
approach to population and resources, when in fact, faced with stubborn 
obstruction and day-to-day political expediency which make most of the 
leaders of the most populous poor countries unreiiable, the issue is 

compulsory cooperation. 

e Compulsory cooperation is not debatable with 166 nations, most of 
whose leaders are irresolute, conditioned by local ist "cuttufes," and 
lacking appropriate notions of the New World Order. Debate means delay and 
forfeiture of our goals and purpose. 

f. The U.N. action against Iraq proves conclusively that resolute 
action on our part can sway other leaders to go along with the necessary 
program. The Iraq action proves that the aura of power can be projected and 
sustained and that the wave of history is sweeping forward. 

PERILS TO BE HEEDED 

There is a twofold opposition which must be eliminated by quick 
action. There are rumblings among some of the "South" regions, notably Brazil 
and Malaysia, to thwart the aims of the UNCED Earth Charter and to thwart the 
international gathering in Brazil in June 1992. 

There is also the unfortunate vacillation in our own ranks, an 
argument that the UNCED leaders have made made the agenda "too political" and 
that the way must first be prepared on a less abrasive cultural basis. 

We present only the fflost recent evidence: 

* Gilberto Hello Hourao, the Brazilian writer, warned in the August 
4 Folha de Sao Paulo that at Hunich in 1938, "It won't be easy»to row 
against the current of that type of ecological epidemic, unleashed against 
our country, which threatens the structure of our cultural, spiritual, and 

political values, and against our very national sovereignty Hessrs. 

Chamberlain and Daladier, heads of the governments of England and France, 
calmly offered the Brazilian Amazon to the Fuehrer." Hitler reportedly 
observed that since the Amazon was in South America, the United States would 
cite the Monroe Doctrine and reject a German occupation of Brazilian 
territory. "Chamberlain and Daladier responded that the proposal had 
Washington's backing." 



/ 



2 - 



» The prime minister of Malaysia, Mahathir Mohamad, announced on Aug. 
16 that his country may boycott the Earth Summit and stated that if the 
conference is used to suppress the Third World, it would be better for these 
nations to hold their own meeting. Speaking to newsmen in Petaling Java, 
Mahathir claimed that environmentalists have launched a global assault on 
Malaysia, while it Is the developed nations, not Malaysia, who are polluting 
the environment. 

* Malaysia's Science, Technology, and Environment minister, Law Hieng 
Ding, announced Aug. 20, according to the New Straits Times of Aug. 23, that 
Malaysia is preparing a document entitled "Greening the World," urging 
developed countries to use wealth and technology to turn the deserts green, 

* Ahmed Djoglaf, Algeria's delegate to the Aug. 15 meeting of the U.N. 
Conference for Environment and Development, said Aug. 23 in Geneva, according 
to the U.N. Inter Press Service, that "We have the old pattern of the North 
imposing the system and the South having to accept. Non-governmental 
organizations are saying that the North hafl hijacked the agenda, and they are 
right They are prepared to let people die but not forests." 

* The Malaysian Sunday Times editorial of Aug. 16 said, 
"Environmentalists make so much of their noble mission In protecting the 

environment which sustains all of us They do not credit Malaysians with 

much intelligence, with a similar concern for the health of the land and 
themselves. Shades of precious fin de siecle romanticism; visions of the noble 
savage stalking big game in arboreal groves, in grunting communion with the 
voices of the land. The same kind of romantic claptrap that got natives all 
over the world sold down the river into slavery, decimated by smallpox and 
clap, driven from their land Into alcoholism and hopsiess helplessness. 

"Malaysia has had its fill of cultural and intellectual domination " 

» The Brazilian Jornal de Commercio on Aug. 19 reported that Brazilian 
Foreign Minister Francisco Rezek said that it was "hypocritical to campaign to 

preserve flora and fauna If the human race becomes extinct, there won't be 

any sense in preserving an exuberant flora or fauna on this planet." 

* Brazil's chief of staff of the Amazon military command, Gen. 
Tnaumaturgo Sotero.Vaz, stated in an interview in the Aug. 28 Folha de Sao 
Paulo, that the nation's armed forces will not permit £co-92 resolutions 
restricting Brazil's sovereignty over the Amazon or creating "Indian nations" 
within the region. The general did not rule out the possibility that Brazil 
could be subjected to "something similar to what happened In the Persian 
Gulf," and declared that persons like Francois Mitterrand and Ted Kennedy 
would not be permitted to order reductions In or elimination of Brazil's armed 
forces. Sotero Vaz said, "If those idiots try to come in here, we're going to 

give it to them and [treat them] like guerrillas " The governor of the 

Amazon, Gilberto Mestrinho, stated Sept. &, "The generals' position is the 
product of looking at reality." 

• A 

* The president of the Industrial Federation of the Brazilian state of 
Para in the Amazon region, Fernando Flexa Ribiero, was quoted by the press 
Sept. 14 as stating that environmentalists want to make the Amazon "a sterile 
preservation." He said Eco-92 could "promote colonialist practices." 

* The Brazilian daily Tribuna de Impresa quoted Joann Grossi, a 
spokesperson for the U.S. Agency for International Development, as saying that 
sterilization is the family planning 'method preferred by President George 
Bush to increase the effectiveness of birth control in the Third World." 



* The Italian Catholic weekly II Sabato published a Sept. 14 article 
by Prof. Franco Cardini stating: "It must be said with utmost clarity that the 
plans of the International Monetary Fund for the [formerl U.S.S.R. and the 

eastern countries are infamous The European Community is in the position 

to supply not only suggestions, but also capital and technological structures, 
hut all this obstructs the plans of the New World Order, which is strictly 
hooked to the United States, the country that remains (have we forgotten?] the 
most indebted country in the world, and is facing a crisis of production 
exemplified by the crashes of the stock market and the big banks. It is this 
new frontier that re-emerging liberal ists would like to propose to the former 
Soviet Union...." The article has been much discussed in Poland, as the first 
frontal criticism of the International Monetary Fund and the free-market model 
from this quarter. 

* India' s delegate at the Geneva UNCED negotiations told the Earth 
Charter organizers, with the support of negotiators from China, the 
Philippines, Chile, Venezuela, Ethiopia, Ghana, and Malaysia, that "we are not 
here as supplicants, and we have not come here for aid,* but "compensatory 
financial flows" to underdeveloped nations are required, according to the 
Sept. 13 Indian press. The delegate, Chandrashekar Dasgupta, also strongly 
opposed plans to bring environmental matters under the U.N. Security Council, 
and insisted that "development" be put center stage instead of bracketed next 
to the environment. He told newsmen that both India and China will have to be 
satisfied on these questions before they attend the Rio summit, declaring that 
without the assent of India and China, no charter will be worth the paper it 
is written on. 

* At the Non-Aligned foreign ministers' meeting in Ghana, India's t 
external affairs, Hadhavsinh Solanki, called Sept. 11 for a comprehensive and 
integrated strategy on debt and a development consensus for this decade. The 
African group at the conference sponsored an urgent call for an international 
conference on debt. 

* The U.N. Conference on trade and Development IUNCTAD) issued its 
annual report Sept. 16, declaring, according to BBC, that the liberal free 
market is not an appropriate model for the developing nations. Finance should 
serve industry, not the other way around, and government has a key role to 
play in certain sectors of the economy. Directed credit for special projects 
is sometimes necessary. Developing nations should look to Germany and Japan 
rather than the U.S. and Britain as examples. The report deplores the tendency 
to introduce an ' Anglo-Saxon" banking system into developing countries. 

WHAT THE WORLDWIDE FUND FOR NATURE IS SAYING 

* An official of the World Wide Fund for Nature IWWFI said Sept. 10 
that the Geneva UNCED results were "absolutely a serious setback. There will 
be no convention on forests by June 1992 for Brazil. Nobody wants to say it 
publicly, but the forests convention is finished. The situation has reached a 
deadlock. This is the first casualty for the UNCED process. Increasingly, 
UNCED is being broken down into blocs, with the developing sector in one bloc. 
We heard the statements of Mahathir, and these can be serious. We hope it is 
just a tactic to precipitate new negotiations, but is has the potential to set 
the ball rolling and cause other countries besides Malaysia to withdraw. It 
is a very difficult situation." 

* A senior advisor on ecological affairs to Britain's Prince Philip 
said Sept. 15 that Eco-92 organizer Maurice Strong had "over-politicized" the 
issue of environmental ism and had raised "ridiculously messianic expectations" 



- 4 - 

for the Earth Summit. 'Strong is mis-focusing attention away from a 
clear and present danger confronting the entire ecology movement: the general 
shift in paradigm toward favoring economic growth. In the former communist 
nations.... We should be avoiding too much overt politicking. We should 
concentrate on change-of-awareness models, and attack the underlying ethical- 
moral considerations that motivate people. Eastern Europe and the Soviet 
Union, that is our biggest challenge. We will have a major problem if they 
try to achieve the level of economic growth of the advanced Western nations. 
This is potentially one of our biggest challenges, and Prince Philip is 
getting more and more involved in dealing with it. 

'Strong is somebody who spent too much time at his wife's New Age 
center, it obviously touched his mind. It all reminds me of the so-called 
Hillerites of the 19th century, who predicted that the world would come to an 
end at some point in 1844, so they all went into the mountains to prepare. 
The world didn't come to an end, and the Hillerites became the Jehovah's 
Witnesses. That is what I see happening with the Earth Summit. Just listen to 
Strong talk about v the most significant event in human history ever,' and Hhe 
last chance to save the planet.' What could be more ridiculous, and 
guaranteed to create a mess? We see the backlash already, in the reactions of 
various Third World countries." 



WHAT MUST BE DOKE 

In the face of mounting opposition from Third World elements, certain 
forces in the Eastern European and Russian regions, and by the Vatican, and 
certain weak-kneed response within the ecology effort, what really is the 
purpose of traipsing around America to convince a handful of farmers, 
unionists, local officials, churchmen, and university environmentalists of the 
necessity of the Earth Charter? If one truly wished to convert the American 
public, would it not be necessary to say fully, openly and explicitly what 
must be done? And that it must be done now? 

Do you really imagine that parading some Third Worlders before 
"hearings" conducted by local celebrities, the Third World will simply quiet 
down, or that the American press coverage of these events will overwhelm this 
opposition? 

Will you take action now that President Bush has the political 
momentum or wait until you must convince America to fight a hundred Vietnams 
simultaneously? This is the time to save the Anglo-Saxon race and its most 
glorious production, the Anglo-Saxon system of banking, insurance and trade. 

We are the living sponsors of the great Cecil Rhodes will of 1877, in 
which Rhodes devoted his fortune to: "The extension of British rule throughout 
the world... the colonization by British subjects of the entire Continent of 
Africa, the Holy Land, the Valley of the Euphrates, the islands of Cyprus and 
Candia, the whole of South America, the islands of the Pacific not heretofore 
possessed by Great Britain, the whole of the Malay Archipelago, the seaboard 
of China and Japan, the ultimate recovery of the United- States of America as 
an Integral part of the British Empire...." - • 

We stand with Lord Hllner's Credo. We too, are 'British Race Patriots" 
and our patriotism is "the speech, the tradition, the principles, the 
aspirations of the British Race.' Do you fear to take this stand, at the very 
last moment when this purpose can be realized? Do you not see that failure 
now, Is to be pulled down by the billions of Lilliputians of lesser race who 
care little or nothing for the Anglo-Saxon system? ' 



- 5 - 

> 

THEREFORE THE FOLLOWING POLICY MUST BE IMPLEMENTED: 

A. The Security Council of the U.N., led by the Anglo-Saxon Hajor 
Nation powers, will decree that henceforth, the Security Council will inform 
all nations that its suffranae on population has ended, that all nations have 
quotas for REDUCTION on a yearly basis, which will be enforced by the Security 
Council by selective or total embargo of credit, items of trade including food 
and medicine, or by military force, when required. 

B. The Security Council of the U.N. will inform all nations that 
outmoded notions of national sovereignty will be discarded and that the 
Security Council has complete legal, military, and economic jurisdiction in 
any region in the world and that this will be enforced by the Major Nations of 
the Security Council. 

C. The Security Council of the U.N. will take possession of all natural 
resources, including the watersheds and great forests, to be used and 
preserved for the good of the Major Nations of the Security Council. 

D. The Security Council of the U.N. will explain that not all races and 
peoples are equal, nor should they be, t Those races proven superior by superior 
achievements ought to rule the lesser races, caring for them on suffrance that 
they cooperate with the Security Council, Decision making, including banking, 
trade, currency rates, and economic development plans, will be made in 
stewardship by the Major Nations. 

E. All of the above constitute the New World Order, in which Order, 
all nations, regions and races will cooperate with the decisions of the Major 
Nations of the Security Council. 

The purpose of this document is to demonstrate that action delayed 
could well be fatal. All could be lost if mere opposition by minor races is 
tolerated and the unfortunate vacillations of our closest comrades is cause 
for our hesitations. Open declaration of intent followed by decisive force is 
the final solution. This must be done before any shock hits our financial 
markets, tarnishing our credibility and perhaps diminishing our force. 






\ffbft v^A^J l%w*w^I« WD G&irttrts* OtC/frf&j 



October 2, 1991 




Congressman Richard A Gephardt 
Attn: Adrianne 

959 Gravois 

t . Louis MO 63123 

ear Congressman Gephardt : 

Adrianne>asked me to send this literature to you. It bears your 
teleph»»e-tTCEmber , but certainly doesn't seem to represent your 
political mind. It emerged at the UNCED conference held in Des Moines 
on September 22, 1991 where an acquaintance was gleaning information 
about the ECO-92 meeting to be held in Rio in June 1992. 

Though the paper speaks against Maurice Strong, we have reason to 
think that people in his camp distributed this rascist literature. Why 
he would "shoot himself in the foot" is beyond me. And why he would 
insinuate you as the creator of this volatile literature is still 
another puzzle of which, perhaps, you may already know. 

Strong is stirring up controversy about the Rio meeting. He will 
preside as the Secretary-General of the Conference. An article not 
included with these papers quotes his speculations that a world 
financial collapse will be precipitated by the Rio meeting. Many are 
watching and listening as this Rio Conference unfolds. 

Our country has been undermined by the same sorts of persons who 
convened the Des Moines UNCED ("unsaid") Conference. We seem to be 
powerless to stop them. It must be doubly hard on you. Congressman 
Gephardt, to serve in these last years of our Constitution, seeing how 
we have lost control of our affairs as we ooze toward the brink. When 
foreigners like Maurice Strong can thwart our laws and dismantle 
American systems at will (I have proof of these statements) right under 
our noses and get away with them, any discerning American can see the 
fat lady rising up to sing". 

It seems that you and your colleagues are much too busy with other 
agendae than to follow the machinations of M. Strong and his European 
treasure hunters, but if Strong is truly responsible for placing your 
phone number on this literature, you may have some real problems at 
hand. 

Sincerely, 







Seorge W ^/Hunt 







K}- 



*f<(<t-T7t/ 



Is 



)1