Skip to main content

Full text of "An introduction to the Trochilidae, or family of humming-birds"

See other formats


r safes ictemeihineete orto iors een paint wi othe Pee ee 28 bis ie ; vt actil lekadbah ect 
as cisulpadyeaniaalacet ant inde sh sa 5 . Rote Tah if EOE si 
mer penevpann eahee a , 
hi) 


Bate 
reife scene 


Pr gab 
{pee 
wget 


PRES Bina 
Be WR ghd 


Nptath 


Sols 
sate. 


at 
asienumde 


Seinugthert - 
ha Someepetine 


Ls 


fas 


Ss rigs 


‘Fa ge pe 


Mamtii ee 
ROT ats 


HUMMING-BIRDS. 


f 
wens oe 
/ 
tA 
é oats 
AN ee & 
& Geme 


INTRODUCTION 


TO 


THE TROCHILIDA, 


OR 


FAMILY OF HUMMING-BIRDS. 


BY 


JOHN GOULD, F.R.S., &c. &c. 


LONDON: 


PRINTED FOR THE AUTHOR, 
BY TAYLOR AND FRANCIS, RED LION COURT, FLEET STREET. 
1861. 


[The Author reserves to himself the right of Translation. | 


Cambridge U 
On perme ep 
the Botany 


eT De ee at ee Fey ee ee ee ee 


le atti stone 


TO 


HER ROYAL HIGHNESS 


THE CROWN PRINCESS OF PRUSSIA, 
PRINCESS ROYAL OF ENGLAND, 
THIS WORK, 
THE TROCHILIDA, 


OR 


FAMILY OF HUMMING-BIRDS, 


IS, WITH PERMISSION, 
DEDICATED 


BY HER ROYAL HIGHNESS’S 


MOST OBEDIENT AND FAITHFUL SERVANT, 


JOHN GOULD. 


NOTICE. 


As the Introduction to my “ Monograph of the Trochilidz ” 
involved much intricate and laborious investigation, parti- 
cularly with regard to the synonymy of the various species, 
I have been induced to have it set up in octavo for the faci- 
lity of correction. From this draft, as it were, it has been 
reprinted in large type for the folio work. Believing that in 
its present form it might be interesting and useful to many 
of my scientific friends and others, I have had a limited 
number of copies printed for distribution among them. It 
must not, however, be regarded as a complete history of the 
family, but merely as an introduction to, and a revision of, 
the genera: the history of the species must be sought for in 
the folio work. At the same time it contains a considerable 
amount of information which has been acquired since the com- 
mencement of the publication, together with many additions 
to the synonymy; these are indicated by prefixed asterisks, 
the synonyms not so distinguished being merely an abbre- 
viated reprint of those which have already appeared in the 
folio edition. As it is not to be expected that persons un- 
connected with science should be conversant with the abbre- 


viations of the names of the authors and the titles of the 


a 


‘ NOTICE. 


works referred to, a fully detailed list of these has been added 


for their information. 
In an early page I have stated that the family consisted of 


nearly 400 species; but it will be found that 416 are enume- 
rated, 360 of which are figured. About 400 species are con- 
tained in my own collection, and these will be at all times 
accessible to men of science for the purposes of examination 


and comparison. 


London, 26 Charlotte Street, 
Bedford Square, W.C., 
Sept. 1, 1861. 


PREFACE. 


Tuar early impressions of the mind are vividly retained, while events 
of the day flit from our memory, must have been experienced by 
every one. How vivid, then, is my recollection of the first Hum- 
ming-Bird which met my admiring gaze! with what delight did 1 
examine its tiny body and feast my eyes on its glittering plumage! 
This early impression, I well remember, gradually increased into an 
earnest desire to attain a more intimate acquaintance with the lovely 
group of birds to which it pertained, and was still further strengthened 
when an opportunity was afforded me of inspecting the, at that time, 
unique collection of the Trochilide formed by the late Mr. George 
Loddiges, of Hackney. This gentleman and myself were imbued with 
a kindred spirit in the love we both entertained for this family of 
living gems. To describe the feeling which animated us with regard 
to them is impossible; it can, in fact, only be realized by those who 
have made Natural History a study, and who pursue the investi- 
gation of its charming mysteries with ardour and delight. That 
our enthusiasm and excitement with regard to most things become 
lessened, if not deadened, by time, particularly when we have ac- 
quired what we vainly consider a complete knowledge of the subject, 
is, I fear, too often the case with most of us; not so, however, I 
believe with those who take up the study of the Family of Humming- 
Birds. Certainly I can affirm that such is not the case with my- 
self; for the pleasure which I experience on seeing a Humming-Bird 
is as great at the present moment as when I first saw one. During 
the first twenty years of my acquaintance with these wonderful works 
of creation, my thoughts were often directed to them in the day, and 
my night dreams have not unfrequently carried me to their native 
forests in the distant country of America. 

In passing through this world I have ened that when in- 
quirers of a strong will really set themselves to attain a definite object, 
they generally accomplish it ; and in my own case the time at length 
arrived when I was permitted to revel in the delightof seeing the Hum- 
ming-Birds in a state of nature, and to observe their habits in the 
ponds onl among the great flowering trees of the United States of 
America and in Canada. For some time a single Humming-Bird was 
my constant companion during days of toil by road and rail, and I 
ultimately succeeded in bringing a living pair within the confines of 

B 


il 


the British Islands, and a single individual to London, where it lived 
for two days, when, from the want of proper food or the change of 
climate, it died. 

Although so enthusiastically attached to the subject, I should not 
have formed a collection of the Trochilide, or attempted an account of 
their history, had not my late friend Mr. George Loddiges (whose 
many excellences are too universally known to need any comment 
from me) been prematurely removed from among us. Prior to his 
lamented death, whatever species I procured from my various cor- 
respondents were freely placed at his disposal; and his collection 
was then unrivalled, and the pride of the owner as well as of his 
country, so far as a private collection could be considered of national 
importance. It was not until after Mr. Loddiges’ decease that I 
determined upon forming the collection I myself possess, which now 
far surpasses every other, both in the number of species and exam- 
ples. Ten years ago this collection was exhibited for a short time in 
the Gardens of the Zoological Society in the Regent’s Park, and, I 
believe, afforded unmixed delight to the many thousands who visited 
those Gardens in the memorable year 1851. Many favourable notices 
of it appeared in the periodicals of the day ; and my friend Mr. Martin 
published a small popular work in express reference to it. During 
the period which has since elapsed I have been unceasing in my en- 
deavours to obtain every species which has been discovered by the 
enterprising travellers of this country, of Germany, of France, and of 
America. It would be invidious were I to extol the exertions of one 
more than those of another, nor could I do so without committing 
injustice; for the travellers of all these countries have shown equal 
intrepidity in their endeavours to bring to light the hidden treasures 
of the great primeeval forests of the New World. Some of them, such 
as Azara, Spix, Bullock, De Lattre, Floresi, Dyson, Hoffmann, and 
Matthews (the discoverer of the wonderful Loddigesia mirabilis), are 
no longer among us: of those living who have paid especial attention 
to the Humming-Birds I may mention the names of Prince Maximilian 
of Wied, Waterton, Gosse, Warszewicz, Linden, Bridges, Jameson, 
Wallace, Bates, Darwin, Reeves, Hauxwell, Skinner, Bourcier, Sallé, 
Salvin, Fraser, Gundlach, Bryant, Montes de Oca, &c. It is to these 
men, living and dead, that science is indebted for a knowledge of so 
many of these “gems of creation ;” and it is by their exertions that 
such collections as Mr. Loddiges’ and my own have been formed. I 
regret exceedingly that I have not seen so much of this lovely group 
of birds in a state of nature as I could have wished: the traveller and 


ili 


the historian seldom go together ; and in this instance it would have 
been impossible. The constant personal attention and care necessary 
for the production of such a work as ‘A Monograph of the Tro- 
chilidae’ could only be given in a metropolis; for in no other place 
could such a publication be accomplished without a greatly increased 
expenditure both of time and money: it is only in capitals like 
London and Paris, that undertakings of this nature can be carried 
out successfully ; for nowhere else are the requisite talents and ma- 
terials to be obtained. 

I feel that I am greatly indebted to those who have honoured this 
work with their support for their kindness and the patience with 
which they have continued with me to its completion—the more espe- 
cially as, owing to the discovery of so many new species since its com- 
mencement, it has extended far beyond its expected limits. I am also 
especially indebted to those persons connected with its production, by 
whose assistance I have been enabled to bring so great an under- 
taking to a satisfactory close. To my artist Mr. Richter, to Mr. Prince, 
and to Mr. Bayfield (all names connected with my former works), I owe 
many thanks. To the projectors and publisher of ‘ Curtis’s Botanical 
Magazine’ I am indebted also for many hints and for permission to 
copy parts of some of their plates of the flowering plants of those 
districts of South America which are frequented by Humming-Birds. 
In case the merits of this work should be unknown to some of my 
subscribers, it is generally acknowledged that its production reflects 
equal credit upon its Editors Sir William Jackson Hooker and Mr. 
Smith, to the artist Mr. Fitch, and to its publisher Mr. Lovell Reeve. 

Numerous attempts had been made at various times to give some- 
thing like a representation of the glittering hues with which this 
group of birds are adorned, but all had ended m disappointment ; 
and the subject seemed so fraught with difficulty that I at first 
despaired of its accomplishment. I determined, however, to make 
the trial, and, after a series of lengthened, troublesome, and costly 
experiments, I have, I trust, partially, if not completely succeeded. 
Similar attempts were simultaneously carried on in America by 
W. M. L. Baily, Esq., who with the utmost kindness and liberality 
explained his process to me; and although I have not adopted it, I 
must in fairness admit that it is fully as successful as my own. I 
shall always entertain a lively remembrance of the pleasant day I 
spent with this gentleman in Philadelphia. It was in his company 
that I first saw a living Humming-Bird in a garden which has become 
classic ground to all true Americans, from the pleasing associations 

B 2 


iv 


connected with its former possessor, the great and good Bartram, 
and from its having been one of the haunts of the celebrated Wilson, 
than whom no one has written more pleasingly on the species of this 
family which inhabits that part of North America, the Trochilus 
colubris. 

It now becomes my pleasing duty to place on record the very 
valuable assistance in the production of this work with which I 
have been favoured by the Directors of Public Museums and private 
individuals. Of these the foremost on the list must be the names of 
M. Jules Bourcier, of Paris, and Thomas Reeves, Esq., of Rio de 
Janeiro. Both these gentlemen have made extensive collections of 
specimens, and have had numerous drawings prepared for the express 
purpose of publishing works on the subject, which with the utmost 
liberality have been placed at my disposal. To M. Bourcier, than 
whom no one possesses a more intimate acquaintance with this group 
of birds, I am likewise indebted for much valuable information which 
has been at all times rendered with the utmost willingness and 
promptitude. My thanks are also due to the Trustees and the 
Keepers of the Zoological Department of the British Museum ; to 
the Director of the Museum of the Jardin des Plantes at Paris; to 
Dr. Peters, Director of the Royal Zoological Museum of Berlin ; 
to George Ure Skinner, Esq., long resident in Guatemala; to that 
intrepid traveller M. Warszewicz, now Director of the Botanic Garden 
at Cracow, who, during his travels in South America, brought to light 
more new species of Humming-Birds than any other explorer; to my 
friends Sir William Jardine, Bart.; W.C. L. Martin, Esq.; T.C. 
Eyton, Esq.; Dr. Sclater; Alfred Newton, Esq.; M. Edouard Ver- 
reaux, of Paris; G. N. Lawrence, Esq., of New York ; and Dr. Baird, 
of Washington ; to Edward Wilson, Esq., to Sigismund Rucker, Esq., 
F. Taylor, Esq., of Liverpool ; William Tucker, Esq., of Trinidad ; 
and to T. F. Erskine, Esq., for the readiness with which they have 
at all times favoured me with both information and the loan of spe- 
cimens. To Miss Loddiges and her brother Mr. Conrad Loddiges, 
I am under considerable obligations for the facility of access they 
have always afforded me to the very valuable collection formed by 
their lamented father. Nor must the name of another valuable friend 
—the late Prince Charles Lucien Bonaparte —be omitted from the 
list of those who took great interest in the present work, he having at 
all times rendered me that scientific assistance which his vast and 
varied talents so well enabled him to afford. 


September 1, 1861. 


INTRODUCTION. 


THE question has often been asked, whence the term Humming- 
Bird has been derived, why the bird is so called. I may state 
in reply that, owing to the rapid movement of the wings of most of 
the members of this group, but especially of the smaller species, a 
vibratory or humming sound is produced while the bird is in the air, 
which may be heard at the distance of several yards, and that it is 
from this circumstance that the trivial name by which these birds 
are known in England has arisen. In France they are recognized 
by the terms Oiseau-Mouche and Colibri ; in Germany their common 
appellation is Kolibri ; by the Dutch they are called Kolibrieve ; by 
the Spaniards Pica flores and Tomino; by the Portuguese Tomeneco 
and Beija-flor ; in the neighbourhood of Xalapa they are known by 
the names of Chupa-rosa and Chupa-myrta, Rose-sucker and Myrtle- 
sucker ; by the Creoles of the Antilles and Guiana they are known by 
the names of Murmures, Bourdons, and Frou-frous. From the Mexi- 
cans, Peruvians, and other nations of South America they have re- 
ceived various appellations, such as Ourissia, huitziteil, tzitztototl, 
guanumbi, quinti or quintiut, quindé, visicilin, pigda, and courbiri ; 
all terms of a metaphorical character, signifying “ rays of the sun,” 
«tresses of the day-star,” ‘‘ murmuring birds,” &c. 

Linneeus applied to the whole of the species known to him the 
generic appellation of Z’rochilus, a name given to some fabulous little 
bird by the ancients, and whence is derived the family designation of 
TrocHitipx. By Brisson, a contemporary of Linneus, the terms 
Polytmus and Mellisuga were proposed ; but with respect to some of 
the thirty-six species described by him, as well as by the older writers, 
such as Seba, Marcgrave, Willoughby, Ray, &c., it is extremely diffi- 
cult, if not impossible, to determine what they really were. We may, 
however, fairly commence our investigations with a greater chance of 
accuracy from the date when the great Swedish naturalist commenced 
his labours. By him twenty-two species were enumerated in the twelfth 
edition of his ‘Systema Nature.’ In Gmelin’s, or the thirteenth 
edition, the list is increased to sixty-seven. Of these I have deter- 
mined about two-thirds; the remainder must for ever continue involved 
in mystery, and their names be erased from our scientific works—the 
descriptions being extremely meagre, and the synonyms occasionally 
referring to figures of very different species. In some instances, even, 
the species are attributed to countries where Humming-Birds are never 
found ; while in others, such as that of the Harlequin Humming-Bird, 
the characters are taken from a plate which must have been drawn 
from imagination and not from any real specimen, These are a few 
of the difficulties which a naturalist has to encounter when access to 


2 


the types cannot be obtained. I think it necessary to make this 
statement as a reason for not quoting all the names given by the 
older authors. Wherever they could be with certainty determined, they 
have been quoted under the species to which they are believed to 
refer. The numerous divisions which more modern writers have 
deemed it necessary to propose will be given in the proper place. 

Latham, who added little or nothing to the previously recorded 
notices of this group of birds, enumerated sixty-five species in his 
‘Index Ornithologicus,’ published in 1790, and ninety-five in the third 
volume of his ‘ General History of Birds,’ which appeared in 1822. 
Of these about two-thirds are real species, the remainder cannot 
be determined, as they are so indefinitely described that it is im- 
possible to ascertain whether they are species or not. 

In 1802 the ‘ Oiseaux dorés,’ the great French work of Audebert 
and Vieillot, was given to the world. In it, besides figures of all the 
Jacamars and Promerops then known, were included seventy plates 
of Humming-Birds. These plates represent species which, though 
then rare, are now extremely common, and which, although not so 
numerous as those contained in the later work of Latham, had the 
advantage of being illustrated in a manner which was intended to 
convey some idea of their brilliancy. In most instances the species 
may be recognized; in others they are doubtful. Independently of 
the illustrations above-mentioned these authors attempted to explain 
the laws which produce the splendid colouring of certain parts of 
these beautiful birds, and have given a plate illustrative of their views 
on the subject. 

In 1823 appeared the second part of the ornithological portion of 
the ‘Tableau Encyclopédique et Méthodique des Trois Régnes de la 
Nature,’ by Bonnaterre and Vieillot, with an enumeration of ninety- 
four species of Humming-Birds, but no additional information as 
to their habits and manners. A few years later (between 1829 and 
1833) appeared M. Lesson’s well-known works, the ‘ Histoire Na- 
turelle des Oiseaux-Mouches,’ ‘ Histoire Naturelle des Colibris,’ and 
‘Les Trochilidées,’—publications which added considerably to our 
previous knowledge of the group, although they enumerate no more 
than 110 species. How little progress, then, had been made towards 
an intimate acquaintance with these lovely birds between the date of 
the twelfth edition of the ‘Systema Naturze’ and that of the last- 
named publications, a period of more than seventy years ! 

If the illustrious Humboldt paid no very marked attention to the 
Trockihde, he must have noticed many of the fine species lately 
brought to light; and it is therefore somewhat surprising that he 
should have been so remarkably silent respecting them when writing 
the ‘Personal Narrative’ of his travels in the new world. It is to 
him and to his associate Bonpland, however, that I consider we are 
indebted for our acquaintance with many of them; for the perusal 
of the interesting account of their enterprising travels has doubtless 
created a desire in others to follow in their footsteps. Thus suc- 
ceeding travellers, who have not been slow to perceive how wonder- 
fully different are the productions of the great Andean ranges from 


3 


those of the other parts of South America have ever been active in 
forming and transmitting to Europe collections in nearly every depart- 
ment of science, and no objects have been more assiduously sought for 
than the flying gems which constantly greeted them at every turn and 
must have been always before their eyes. Among the most eminent 
travellers who have succeeded Humboldt are D’Orbigny, Schom- 
burgk, Tschudi, Castelnau, Burmeister, and others, who, with 
more recent but less known explorers, have added so largely to our 
knowledge of the Trochilida. Both Frenchmen and Belgians have 
proceeded to South America to procure supplies of these birds; and 
dealers from those countries have established themselves in some of 
the cities of that part of the world for the like purpose. From Sta. 
Fé de Bogota alone many thousands of skins are annually sent to 
London and Paris, and sold as ornaments for the drawing-room and 
for scientific purposes. The Indians readily learn the art of skinning 
and preserving, and, as a certain amount of emolument attends the 
collecting of these objects, they often traverse great distances to pro- 
cure them; districts more than a hundred miles on either side of Bo- 
gota are strictly searched ; and hence it is that from these places alone 
we receive not less than seventy species of this family of birds. In 
like manner the residents of many parts of Brazil employ their slaves 
in collecting, skinning, and preserving them for the European mar- 
ket; and many thousands are annually sent from Rio de Janeiro, 
Bahia, and Pernambuco. They also supply the inmates of the con- 
vents with many of the more richly coloured species for the manu- 
facture of artificial-feather flowers. How numerous, then, must these 
birds be in their native wilds, and how wonderfully must they keep 


in check the peculiar kind of insect life upon which they principally 


feed! which is, doubtless, one of the objects for which they were 
designed. After these few cursory remarks I proceed to give a 
general history of the group, the range and distribution of the species, 
and such additional information as I have acquired during the course 
of my labours. 

“<The first mention which is made of the Humming-Birds,” says 
M. Lesson, “ in the narratives of the adventurers who proceeded 
to America, not with the design of studying its natural productions, 
but for the discovery of gold, dates from 1558, and is to be found in 
‘Les Singularités de la France Antarctique ’ (Brazil) of André 
Thevet and Jean de Lery, companions of La Villegaignon, who at- 
tempted in 1555 to found a French colony there; but these super- 
ficial accounts would not have unfolded their natural history, had not 
the old naturalists who published their observations at the commence- 
ment of the seventeenth century taken care to make them better 
known; and we find some good accounts of them in the voluminous 
compilation of Nieremberg, in the collection of fragments from the 
great works of Hernandez or Fernandez, and in those of Piso. 
Ximenez, Acosta, Gomara, Marcgrave, Garcilasso, and Dutertre often 
mention these birds, but their remarks are so superficial that it 
would be of little use to quote them now. Towards the end of the 
same century Sir Hans Sloane, Catesby, Edwards, Brown, Father 


4 


Labat, Plumier, Louis Feuillée, and Rochefort gave tolerably com- 
plete figures and descriptions of some of the species ; but it was not 
until the commencement of the eighteenth century that we became 
better acquainted with their natural history.” 

It will be seen that little was really known respecting the Hum- 
ming-Birds even at the end of the career of the great Linnzeus. 
From Captain Cook both Pennant and Linnzeus became aware that 
a species was found as far north as Nootka Sound, while every voy- 
ager to the eastern shores of North America brought tidings of its 
representative in the Trochilus colubris. Jamaica, St. Domingo, 
and the smaller islands of the West Indies, furnished a fair quota 
in the species inhabiting those countries ; and correspondents were 
speedily established by Sloane, Brown, Edwards and Catesby in 
Hispaniola, Demerara, and Brazil. Of all these countries the Hum- 
ming-Birds and other zoological productions were then but partially, 
and only partially, known. The great primeval forests of Brazil, 
the vast palm-covered districts of the deltas of the Amazon and 
the Orinoco, the fertile flats and savannahs of Demerara, the luxu- 
riant and beautiful region of Xalapa (the country of perpetual 
spring) and other parts of Mexico, were literally untrodden ground 
by the ornithological collector. Up to this time the vast provinces 
of the New World had only been skirted ; all within was virgin land, 
wherein even the explorer had scarcely placed a foot, and where the 
only human inhabitants were the wild children of nature—the Bota- 
cudos and other tribes of South American Indians. If the country 
glanced at in the foregoing remarks had provided the naturalists of 
the days of Linnzeus with ample materials for study and investiga- 
tion, how much greater would have been their amazement and delight 
had they been acquainted with the hidden treasures of the great 
Andean ranges, which stretch along the entire country, from the 
Rocky Mountains on the north to near Cape Horn on the south. 
Along the whole line of this great backbone, as it were, of Ame- 
rica, at remarkably short intervals, occur species of this family of 
birds of the greatest beauty and interest, which are not only spe- 
cifically but generically distinct from each other. Whole groups 
of them, remarkable for their singularity, have become known to us 
from the inquiries and explorations of later travellers ; and abundant 
as the species may he towards the northern and southern portions 
of the great chain of mountains, they vastly increase as we approach 
the equator. These equatorial regions teem with species, and even 
genera, which are not found elsewhere. Between the snowline of 
the summits of the towering volcanoes and their bases, many zones 
of temperature occur, each of which has its own especial animal and 
vegetable life. The alpine region has its particular flora, accompanied 
by insects especially adapted to such situations ; and attendant upon 
these are peculiar forms of Humming-Birds, which never descend 
to the hot valleys, and scarcely even to the cooler and more tempe- 
rate paramos. Many of the highest cones of extinct and of exist- 
ing volcanos have their own faunas and floras: even in the interior 
walls of ancient craters, wherever vegetation has gained a footing, 


~~ 


5 


some species of Humming-Birds have there, and there only, been 
as yet discovered. It is the exploration of such situations that has 
led to the acquisition of so many additional species of this family 
of birds, which now reach to nearly 400 in number. 

_It might be thought by some persons that 400 species of birds so 
diminutive in size, and of one family, could scarcely be distinguished 
from each other; but any one who studies the subject, will soon 
perceive that such is not the case. Even the females, which assi- 
milate more closely to each other than the males, can be separated 
with perfect certamty ; nay, even a tail-feather will be sufficient for 
a person well versed in the subject to say to what genus and species 
the bird from which it has been taken belongs. I mention this fact 
to show that what we designate a species has really distinctive and 
constant characters; and in the whole of my experience, with many 
thousands of Humming-Birds passing through my hands, I have 
never observed an instance of any variation which would lead me to 
suppose that it was the result of a union of two species. I write 
this without bias, one way or the other, as to the question of the 
origin of species. I am desirous of representing nature in her won- 
derful ways as she presents herself to my attention at the close of 
my work, after a period of twelve years of incessant labour, and not 
less than twenty years of interesting study. Iam, of course, here 
speaking of the special object of my own studies—the Humming- 
Birds. 

It is somewhat remarkable that any persons living in the present 
enlightened age should persist in asserting that Humming-Birds are 
found in India and Africa. Yet there are many who believe that 
such is the case. Even in a work but recently published it is stated 
that Humming-Birds and Toucans are both found in the last-men- 
tioned country ; and I was once brought into a rather stormy alter- 
cation with a gentleman who asserted that the Humming-Bird was 
found in England, and that he had seen it fly in Devonshire. Now 
the object seen in Devonshire was the insect called the Humming- 
Bird Moth, Macroglossa stellarum; and the birds supposed to be- 
long to this family by residents and travellers in India and Africa are 
of a totally different group—the Nectariniide or Sun-Birds. These 
latter birds have no relationship to the Trochilide; they are not 
even representatives of them in the countries alluded to; and their 
only points of resemblance consist in their diminutive size and the 
showy character of their plumage. Let it be understood, then, once 
for all, that the Humming-Birds are confined to America and its 
islands (that is, the West Indiés im the Atlantic, and Chiloe and 
Juan Fernandez in the Pacific; none have as yet been found in the 
Galapagos). The Selasphorus rufus goes as far north as Sitka. Kot- 
zebue informs us that it is found in summer as high as the sixty-first 
parallel on the Pacific coast ; while, on the antartic end of the con- 
tinent, Captain King observed the Eustephanus galeritus flitting about 
among the Fuchsias of Tierra del Fuego in a snow-storm. Both these 
species, however, are migrants,—the northern bird retiring, as au- 
tumn approaches, to the more temperate climate of Mexico, while the 


6 


other wends its way up to the warmer regions of Bolivia and Peru. 
The migration of these birds is of course performed at directly op- 
posite periods. Both the Selasphorus rufus and the Trochilus colu- 
bris spend the summer in high northern latitudes ; but the former 
always proceeds along the western, and the latter along the eastern 
parts of the country: the 7. colubris even extends its range as far 
as the fifty-seventh parallel, where it was observed by Sir John 
Richardson. Although these and some other species pass over vast 
extents of country, I do not believe that they are capable of long-con- 
tinued flights : that is, I question their power of crossing seas or more 
than from one island to another; for although we know that the 
two birds above-mentioned pass over many degrees of latitude in 
their migrations, I believe that these journeys are performed in a 
series of comparatively short stages, and always by land, and that 
the whole of their movements are more or less influenced by the 
progress of the sun north or south as the case may be. 

North America, then, may be said to have two Humming-Birds— 
a western and an eastern species. It is true that Audubon has men- 
tioned two others in his great work—the Lampornis Mango and 
Calypte Anne—and states that the former was found at Key West 
in East Florida. Since then, however, I believe no other example 
has been discovered there; and one can scarcely understand the oc- 
currence of the bird in that part of America, since it is a native of 
countries and islands lying so much further south. 

Leaving North America, and proceeding south, we begin to meet 
with several other species, which rarely extend their range to the 
north—viz. the Calypte Anne, C. Coste, Selasphorus platycercus, 

vochilus Alexandri, ard Calothorax Calliope. These birds are also 
migratory, but their range is much less extensive than that of the 
two species previously mentioned. As we advance im this direction, 
Humming-Birds become extremely numerous, and, as regards ge- 
nera and species, continue to increase in the more southern country 
of Guatemala, where every variety of climate is to be found. The 
forest-clad mountains of Vera Paz appear to afford a winter retreat to 
many of the northern species, as the regions contiguous to the Atlas 
range in Africa do to the numerous little warblers of this country 
and the continent of Europe. Besides these migrants, Guatemala, 
Honduras, and Costa Rica have species which are either stationary 
or merely change their quarters in accordance with the flowering- 
season of the trees on which they seek their food, moving east and 
west or vice versd according to circumstances. The countries fur- 
ther south, or those lying betweei Guatemala and Panama, appear 
to have a bird-fauna almost peculiar to themselves; for it is seldom 
that the species inhabiting Costa Rica and Veragua extend their 
range to the northward, neither are they often found in the more 
southern country of New Granada. 

It is in the last-mentioned country—New Granada—that some 
of the finest of the Trochilide are found,—its towering mountains 
having species peculiar to themselves, while its extensive paramos 
are tenanted by forms not found elsewhere. On the principal 


7 


ranges of the Andes, species exist which do not occur on the lower 
elevations situated more to the eastward. Thesé ranges are the 
sources of numerous rivers, some of which have a northerly course 
—such as the Atrato, Cauca, and the great Magdalena, which 
debouch into the Caribbean Sea—and the river Zulia, which 
empties itselfinto the Lake of Maracaybo. Some of the very finest 
species yet discovered were collected near the town of Pamplona, 
which is situated on the banks of the last-mentioned river. The 
country round Antioquia, situated on the lower, and Popayan on the 
upper part of the Cauca, appear also to be very rich in natural 
productions, and particularly so in Humming-Birds. It is, however, 
on the paramos which surround Bogota, and on the luxuriantly clad 
sides of the valleys through which flows the main stream of the 
Magdalena, that the greatest number of species have been discovered. 
Bogota, the capital of this district, has for a long time been the 
centre whence collections have been transmitted to Europe and the 
United States. The Indians have been initiated into the modes of 
preparing these lovely objects ; and as gain and excitement have thus 
gone hand in hand, this part of America may be said to have been 
thoroughly ransacked, and I expect that but few novelties remain to 
be discovered therein. Now as most of the productions that have 
yet reached us from Antioquia and Pamplona, two districts lying in 


about the same parallel of latitude on either side the great valley “« ~ 


the Magdalena, are guite distinct and different from those of Bogota, 
we may safely infer that, if they: were as closely searched, many new 
species would be found. The country of the Caraccas and Cumana _ 
have Humming-Birds which partake less of the characters of the 

mountain species, and assimilate more closely to those of the Guianas, 
and Northern Brazil. It will be seen, I think, from what I have here 
said, that the species of Humming-Birds increase in numbers as we 
proceed towards the equator; that most of them are confined to 


countries having peculiar physical characters ; and that those of New ~~ = 


Granada differ considerably from the Humming-Birds of Veragua, 
Costa Rica, and Guatemala. I have observed an equally marked 
difference in the species which inhabit the high lands giving rise to 
the rivers which run eastward; I mean the many tributaries of the 
Napo, the Caqueta or Japura, and the Amazon. 

From the eastern side of Chimborazo flow many streams which 
ultimately find their way into the Amazon; and however numerous 
the species found in the elevated districts of New Granada may be, 
I believe that when the dense and luxuriant forests bordering these 
well-watered lands are fully investigated, the species inhabiting them 
will be found far to exceed in number those of every other district. 
Even the snowy Chimborazo may be said to be inhabited by Hum- 
ming-Birds: certain it is that the Oreotrochilus Chimborazo lives 
upon it just below the line of perpetual congelation, some of my 
specimens of this bird killed by M. Bourcier bearing on the attached 
labels an elevation of 16,000 feet; and Mr. Fraser, I believe, killed 
others in an equally elevated region. Here, then, is a bird which 
encounters the cold blasts of these lofty situations with impunity, 


8 


dwelling in a world of almost perpetual sleet, hail, and rain, and 
there feeding upon the insects which resort to the Chuquiraga in- 
signis and other flowering plants peculiar to the situation. ‘These 
truly alpine birds have always a great charm with me; and as the 
Species just mentioned is especially beautiful, it is of course a great 
favourite. Besides Chimborazo, there exist many other cones of 
but little less elevation, such as Pichincha, Cotopaxi, and Cayambe, 
which, strange to say, are reported to be frequented by species pecu- 
liar to each ; and if this be the case, how many other summits yet 
untrodden may reveal others at present unknown to us? Now what 
I have said with regard to the gradual increase of Humming-Bird life 
from the north to the equator may be equally said of their increase 
towards the same line from the south. The species there found, 
although quite different from those of the north, perform precisely 
the same functions, are subject to the same migratory movements, &c. 

To the southward of the equator, however, the species appear to 
be far less numerous. And it could not be expected but that such 
would be the case when we consider the particular character of the 
country,—the dry and sterile plains of Peru, the extensive pampas 
of La Plata, &c., being all unsuited to insect and therefore to Hum- 
ming- Bird life, and a diminution in their numbers the natural result. 
But the paucity in numbers would seem to be compensated in the 
beauty of the individuals. Peru and Bolivia are the cradles ofthe 
splendid comet-tailed species of the genus Cometes, the Lesbie, Di- 
phogene, the delicate birds known as Thaumasture, &c. These 
countries produce also the largest Humming- Bird yet known, the Pa- 
tagona gigas, which with an Oreotrochilus and a Lustephanus are 
all the species known to me from the lengthened country of Chili. 
The little island called Chiloe, characterized by great humidity, is 
inhabited by the common Chilian species last mentioned ; while the 
celebrated island of Juan Fernandez, over 300 miles from the main. 
land, is tenanted by three kinds, of which two are so distinct from 
all others known, that they cannot for a moment be confounded with 
any of them. The three species, in fact, which people this solitary 
spot in the wide Pacific are very different from each other; and [ 
may mention that nothing like a cross or intermixture has ever been 
observed, an event that might have been expected to occur here, 
if ever it does among animals living in a state of nature. Strange 
to say, these beautiful creatures are almost the only examples of bird 
life existing on this remarkable island. The knowledge of the 
existence of these lovely flying gems gives an additional zest to 
the interest attached to the scene of the principal events in Defoe’s 
charming tale. 

In the foregoing pages I have glanced at the species of Humming- 
Birds inhabiting the great range of mountains running north and 
south through many degrees of latitude on both sides of the equator, 
Whole genera of the Trochilide are found there, and there alone, 
In the highlands of Mexico, among others we find the peculiar 
genera Delattria, Selasphorus, and Calypte. On crossing the rib- 
bon-like strip of land called the Isthmus of Panama, we enter upon 


9 


a region of highlands bearing the genera Oxypogon, Lafresnaya, 
Bourcierta, Dorifera, Helianthea, Heliangelus, Eriocnemis, Lesbia, 
Cynanthus, Agleactis, Metallura, Ramphomicron, and many others, 
none of which are found in the less-elevated countries of Brazil, the 
Guianas, or the West Indian Islands. It is true that these coun- 
tries, particularly Brazil, possess forms of Humming-Birds which are 
now and then feebly represented in the Andes; but these cases are 
quite exceptional. When we leave the Andes we bid adieu to the 
finest, the largest, and the most gorgeously attired species.. Other 
beautiful kinds do here and there exist in Brazil, such as the Chry- 
solampis moschitus, the Topaza pella, and the Lophornithes; but 
the greater number are comparatively small and inconspicuous. Of 
the members of the genus Phaéthornis, a group of Humming-Birds, 
popularly known by the name of Hermits, from their frequenting the 
darkest and most retired parts of the forest, three-fourths are natives 
of Brazil. The great forest-covered delta of the Amazon, where 
palms are numerous, seems to be particularly unfavourable to the 
Trochilide, since from Para to Ega there are scarcely ten species of 
the family to be met with. 

In this cursory glance at the distribution of this family of birds, 
those frequenting the West Indian Islands have yet to be noticed ; 
and here not only do we find some peculiar to those islands as a whole, 
but in each of them, with but very few exceptions, there are species 
and even genera which are not found in the Andes, the other islands, 
or the more contiguous flat parts of the South American Continent. 
Cuba has at least three, one of which is a most lovely little bird. 
The principal island of the Bahaman group is in like manner fa- 
voured with a charming Calothoraz, which Dr. Bryant tells us flies 
in great. numbers round the town of Nassau ; yet the bird does not, 
I believe, inhabit any of the other islands or the mainland. 

Jamaica possesses three, which are all quite distinct, and so widely 
different from every other, that it is a perfect mystery to the na- 
turalist how they first obtained a footing there. Nothing like in- 
terbreeding between two species appears to occur in this island ; 
if such were the case, we could not but be aware of the fact, since we 
have not only been for many years in the habit of receiving hundreds 
of birds from Jamaica, but this island has had the advantage of a 
naturalist, Mr. Gosse, who has most closely observed the birds re- 
sident there. St. Domingo has two species, differing from those of 
Jamaica. This law with respect to the Humming-Bird inhabitants 
of the West Indian and Leeward Islands, is equally carried out in 
the necklace-like string of the Wimdwards ; but when we arrive at 
the island of Trinidad, the species become much more numerous 
and partake of the character of those which inhabit the mainland— 
the opposite shores of Venezuela. 

It may be asked, what is our present knowledge of the existing 
species of Humming-Birds, and if there may not be others to be dis- 
covered in the great primeval forests of the western and other parts 
of the vast continent of the new world. My reply is that, in all pro- 
bability, many more than are known to us do exist, and that a very 


10 


lengthened period must elapse before we shall acquire anything like 
a perfect knowledge of the group. Whatever I may have done 
towards the elucidation of the subject, I must only be regarded as a 
pioneer for those who, in future ages, will render our acquaintance 
with this family of birds so much more complete than it is at the 
present time. 

The countries of South America whose productions are least known 
are Costa Rica, Veragua, Panama, the sea-bord between Carthagena 
and Guayaquil, the forests of La Paz and other parts of Bolivia, the 
whole of the eastern slopes of the Andes bordering Peru and Ecuador, 
and the western portion of Brazil. All these countries will doubtless 
furnish new kinds of Humming-Birds when the explorer shall extend 
his researches into their unknown recesses. We may feel fully con- 
vinced that such will be the case from the circumstance of single 
individuals in a youthful or imperfect state, which we cannot identify 
as belonging to any known species, occasionally occurring in the great 
collections sent from time to time to Europe. My own collection 
contains several examples of this kind, which will doubtless at some 
future day prove to belong to undescribed species. For more than 
twenty long years have I been sending the most earnest entreaties, 
accompanied with drawings, to my correspondents in Peru and Ecua- 
dor for additional examples of that truly wonderful bird the Loddi- 
gesia mirabilis. These entreaties have been backed by the offers of 
large sums of money to any person who would procure them; but 
up to the present moment no second example has been obtained. 
Probably the single individual killed by Mr. Matthews in the neigh- 
bourhood of Chachapoyas was one which had accidentally strayed 
beyond the area in which the species usually dwells, and which has 
not yet been discovered. That it may be a nocturnal bird has some- 
times suggested itself to my mind, and that this may be the reason 
why it has not since been seen. Those of my readers who are not 
acquainted with this most wonderful member of the Trochilidee will 
do well to refer to the plate, in which a correct representation of it 
is given by the masterly hand of Mr. Richter. 

The preceding remarks must, I think, have given the reader a 
general idea of the countries inhabited by the members of the 
great family of Humming-Birds ; it now becomes necessary to speak 
of their peculiar structure, and the place they appear to occupy 
in the Class Aves. By systematists they have been bandied about 
from one group to another: by some they have been associated with 
the Sun-Birds (Nectarinie) ; by others with the Cypseline, Picine, 
Sittine, Certhine, &c. 

In Brisson’s arrangement, published in 1760, they constitute with 
the Creepers his twelfth order. By Linneus in 1766, and Latham 
in 1790, they were placed in the class Pice, together with the Creep- 
ers, Hoopoes, &c. In like manner they are associated with the same 
birds in the fourteenth order of Lacépéde’s arrangement, published 
in 1799. In Duméril’s classification, proposed in 1806, they form 
part of his second order—Passerine Birds—and are associated with 
Kingfishers, Todies, Nuthatches, Bee-Eaters, Creepers, &c. They 


id 


form a distinct family of the second Order, Ambulatores, in the 
arrangement of Illiger published in 1811. They also constitute a 
distinct family by themselves of the Tenuirostral Division of the order 
Passeres in Cuvier’s system of 1817. By Vieillot, whose arrange- 
ment was published about the same time, they form part of the 
twenty-second family Sylvicole, and are associated with Creepers, 
Sun-Birds, and Honey-eaters. By Temminck, in the second edition 
of his ‘ Manuel d’Ornithologie,’ published in 1820, they were placed, 
together with the Creepers, Sun-Birds, Hoopoes, &c., in his sixth 
Order, Anisodactyli. In De Blainville’s arrangement, which appeared 
in the years in 1815, 1821, and 1822, they form a separate family 
of the Saléatores, with the Kingfishers preceding, and the Crows 
following them. Vigors, in 1825, made them a distinct family of his 
second Order, Insessores,—the preceding family being composed of the 
Sun-Birds, and the succeeding one of the Promeropide. Latreille 
in the same year pleced them in the fourth family Tenuirostres of the 
second Order or Passerine Birds, along with the Hoopoes, Promerops, 
Sun-Birds, &c. Lesson, in 1828, made them the eighth family of the 
Insessores, and associated them with the Sun-Birds, Creepers, &c. By 
Boié they were divided in the ‘Isis’ for 1831 into eleven genera, Viz. 
Bellatriz, Calliphlox, Glaucis, Anthracoraz, Heliactin, Hylocharis, 
Basilinna, Chrysolampis, Heliothriz, Smaragdites, and Eulampvs. 
Swainson, in 1837, constituted them the third family of the Tenuz- 
rostres, with the Sun-Birds preceding, and the Promeropidee and Hoo- 
poes succeeding them. In Mr. G. R. Gray’s ‘List of the Genera 
of Birds,’ published in 1841, and in his great work ‘On the Genera 
of Birds,’ completed in 1850, they form the third family of the Te- 
nuirostres. In the ‘Conspectus Systematis Ornithologie’ of Prince 
Charles Lucien Bonaparte, given to the world a few years before his 
lamented death, they form Stirps 17 suspensi, of his second Order 
Passeres; and Tribe Volucres, with the Hoopoes and Promerops 
placed before, and the Swifts and Swallows after them. In his ‘ Con- 
spectus Generum Avium’ they form the eleventh family of the Inses- 
sores, with the Swifts preceding them, and are succeeded by the 
Phytotomide or Plant-Cutters. In his ‘“‘ Conspectus Trochilorum,” 
published in the ‘ Revue et Magasin de Zoologie’ for May 1854, they 
form the seventy-second family of his Passerine Birds. In Dr. Reich- 
enbach’s arrangement, in Cabanis’s ‘Journal fir Ornithologie’ for 
1853, they are fancifully divided into groups of Fairies, Elfs, Gnomes, 
_Sylphs, &c. ; and in his ‘Trochilmarum Enumeratio’ he places 
these birds between the true Creepers on the one hand, and the 
Hoopoes on the other. By Cabanis, the latest writer on the subject, 
they are placed with the Swifts and Goatsuckers, in his 3rd Order 
Strisores and Tribe Macrochires. ; j 
Ornithologists of the present day consider them to be more inti- 
mately allied to the true Swifts than to any other group of birds. 
This view of the subject is supported by the fact of the Humming- 
Birds, like the Swifts, having most ample wings, vast powers of flight, 
and a bony structure very closely assimilating: and this alliance is 
still further exemplified in some parts of their nidification, the number 


{2 


and colour of their eggs, &c. It is not to be expected that, with 
this subject before me for so many years, I should have been inat- 
tentive to the consideration of the place these birds should occupy 
in our attempts at a natural arrangement; and while I admit that 
they are somewhat allied to the Swifts, they are so essentially distinct 
from these and all other birds, that they might be separated into a 
distinct Order with quite as much, if not greater, propriety as the 
Pigeons when considered in relation to the Gallinaceous Birds. They 
have certain characters, dispositions, and modes of life which are not 
to be noticed in any other group of birds: their cylindrical bills, 
double-tubed tongues, enormously developed sternums, and cor- 
responding pectoral muscles, rigid primaries, the first of which is the 
longest, and their diminutive feet separate them from all others. In 
the Swifts and Fissirostral birds generally the sexes are alike in out- 
ward appearance ; in the Humming-Birds they are in nearly every 
instance totally different in their colouring: in the former the young 
assume the livery of the adult before they leave the nest, while the 
contrary is the case with the Humming-Birds. How different, too, 
is the texture of the luminous feathers with which they are clothed ; 
and vastly diversified in form as the tail is in the various genera, the 
number of feathers in the whole of them is invariably ten. In their 
disposition they are unlike birds, and approach more nearly to 
insects. Many of the species fearlessly approach almost within reach 
of the hand; and if they enter an open window, as curiosity may 
lead them to do, they may be chased and battled with round the 
apartment until they fall exhausted ; and if then taken up by the 
hand, they almost immediately feed upon any sweet, or pump up 
any fluid, that may be offered them, without betraying either fear or 
resentment at their previous treatment. A Trochilus colubris, cap- 
tured for me by some friends at Washington (Baron Osten Sacken, 
Mr. Odo Russell, and his brother Mr. Arthur Russell), immediately 
afterwards partook of some saccharine food that was presented to it, 
and in two hofirs it pumped tbe fluid out of a little bottle whenever 
I offered it ; and in this way it lived with me a constant companion 
for several days, travelling in a little thin gauzy-bag distended by a 
slender piece of whalebone, and suspended to a button of my coat. It 
was only necessary for me to take the little bottle from my pocket to 
induce it to thrust its spiny bill through the gauze, protrude its 
lengthened tongue down the neck of the bottle, and pump up the 
fluid until it was satiated ; it would then retire to the bottom of its 
little home, preen its wing- and tail-feathers, and seem quite content. 

The specimens I brought alive to this country were as docile and 
fearless as a great moth or any other insect would be under similar 
treatment. The little cage in which they lived was twelve inches 
long, by seven inches wide, and eight inches high. In this was 
placed a diminutive branch of a tree, and suspended to the side a 
glass phial which I daily supplied with saccharine matter in the 
form of sugar or honey and water, with the addition of the yelk of 
an unboiled egg. Upon this food they appeared to thrive and be 
happy during the voyage along the sea-bord of America and across 


13 


the Atlantic, until they arrived within the influence of the climate of 
Europe. Off the western part of Ireland symptoms of drooping 
unmistakeably exhibited themselves ; but although they never fully 
rallied, I, as before stated, succeeded in bringing one of them alive to 
London, where it died on the second day after its arrival at my house. 
The vessel in which I made the passage took a northerly course, which 
carried us over the banks of Newfoundland; and although the cold 
was rather severe during part of the time, the only effect it appeared. 
to have upon my little pets was to induce a kind of torpidity, from 
which, however, they were readily aroused by placing them in the 
sunshine, or in some warm situation, such as before a fire, in the 
bosom, &c. I do assure my readers that I have seen these birds 
cold and stiff, and to all appearance dead; and that from this state 
they were readily restored with a little attention and removal into 
light and heat, when they would “‘ perk up,” flutter their little wings, 
and feast away upon their usual food as if in the best state of health. 

How wonderful must be the mechanism which sets in motion and 
sustains for so lengthened a time the vibratory movements of a Hum- 
ming-Bird’s wings! To me their action appeared unlike any thing of 
the kind I had ever seen before, and strongly reminded me of a piece 
of machinery acted upon by a powerful spring. I was particularly 
struck by this peculiarity in the flight, as it was exactly the opposite 
of what I expected. The bird does not usually glide through the 
air with the quick darting flight of a swallow or swift, but con- 
tinues tremulously moving its wings while passing from flower to 
flower, or when taking a more distant flight over a high tree or across 
ariver. When poised before any object, this action is so rapidly 
performed that it is impossible for the eye to follow each stroke, and 
a hazy semicircle of indistinctness on each side of the bird is all that 
is perceptible. ‘The wind produced by the wings of these little 
birds,” says Mr. Salvin, “appears to be very considerable; for I 
noticed that while an example of Cyanomyia cyanocephala which 
had flown into the room was hovering over a large piece of wool, 
the entire surface of the wool was violently agitated.” Although 
many short intermissions of rest are taken during the day, the bird 
may be said to live in air—an element in which it performs every 
kind of evolution with the utmost ease, frequently rising perpendicu- 
larly, flying backward, pirouetting or dancing off, as it were, from 
place to place, or from one part of a tree to another, sometimes 
descending, at others ascending ; it often mounts up above the tower- 
ing trees, and then shoots off like a little meteor at a right angle ; 
at other times it quietly buzzes away among the little flowers near 
the ground; at one moment it is poised over a diminutive weed, 
at the next it is seen at a distance of forty yards, whither it has 
vanished with the quickness of thought. During the heat of the 
day the shady retreats beneath the trees are very frequently visited ; 
in the morning and evening the sunny banks, the verandahs, and 
other exposed situations are more frequently resorted to. 

The foregoing remarks are from personal observation of the habits 
of Trochilus colubris ; and I have been informed by Mr. Salvin and 

c 


14 


others that a similar action characterizes most of the species. I 
believe, however, that those members of the Trochilidse which are 
furnished with more ample wings, such as the species of the genera 
Agleactis, Ramphomicron, Pterophanes, and Patagona, have a very 
different mode of flight, move their wings with diminished rapidity, 
and pass much more slowly through the air. Mr. Darwin, when 
speaking of the Patagona gigas, says, ‘‘ Like others of the family, it 
moves from place to place with a rapidity which may be compared to 
that of Syrphus among Diptera, and Sphinw among Moths; but 
whilst hovering over a flower it flaps its wings with a very slow and 
powerful movement, totally different from that vibratory one, common 
to most of the species, which produces the humming noise. I never 
saw any other bird, where the force of its wings appeared (as in a 
butterfly) so powerful in proportion to the weight of its body. 
When hovering by a flower, its tail is constantly expanded and shut 
like a fan, the body being kept in a nearly vertical position. This 
action appears to steady and support the bird, between the slow 
movements of its wings.” 

In the intervals of flight, I believe that they not only rest in the 
ordinary way, but even pass some time in sleep ; at least I found 
that this was the case with my living birds, and that from this state 
of partial torpor they were not easily aroused. In the morning and 
evening they were far more animated than at any other period of the 
day ; and they would even perform their buzzing evolutions round 
their cage, and sip from their little bottle in the night-time, if a light 
was brought into the room. They usually sat in a moping position, 
with the bill in a line with the body, or slightly elevated, after the 
manner of the Kingfishers. I never saw them hang by their feet 
and sleep with their heads downwards—a position which I have 
been informed is sometimes assumed by Humming-Birds. 

When we have compared the wings of Calliphlow Amethystinus with 
those of Patagona gigas, we have noticed the two extremes of develop- 
ment in these organs, but many intermediate forms exist, and each 
modification has doubtless an influence on the mode and power of 
flight. I cannot leave the subject of the wings without alluding to the 
extraordinary development of the shafts of the primaries in the Cam- 
pylopteri. The great dilatation of these feathers would lead one to 
suppose that they have an influence on the aérial movements of 
the birds; but, strange to say, this remarkable feature only occurs 
in the males; the females are entirely destitute of it. It might 
naturally be supposed that such a: modification of so important an 
organ must be formed with an especial object. What, then, can be 
the particular use of the broad dilated shafts of these singularly and 
apparently awkwardly shaped wings? Generally the primaries and 
secondaries are of a sombre and uniform hue, while the shoulders 
or wing-coverts, in most instances, are of the same coloar as the 
other parts of the body. There are, however, a few, but a very few 
exceptions to the rule; and I may mention the Eulampis jugularis 
and Pterophanes Temmincki as instances in point: both these birds 
have luminous wings, and must form very striking objects during 


i 


4‘ 


flight ; and, as I believe colour is seldom given without the intention | 
of its being exhibited, there is doubtless something peculiar in the | 
economy of these birds. The primaries and secondaries are in some ~ 


instances stiff and rigid, while in others they are soft and yielding ; 
some are broad, others narrow ; they are always the same in number, 
and the first quill is constantly the longest, except in Polytmus 
cephalater, where the second exceeds the first in length. 

_ When we turn to the bill, we find this organ to be greatly diver- 
sified in form, and that each of these variations appears to be specially 
adapted for some given purpose ; indeed, I have never seen the law of 
adaptation more beautifully exemplified than in the multiplied forms 
exhibited in the bills of the members of the various genera of this 
family of birds. A certain generic character runs through the whole 
of them; the gape in all cases is very small, and whether the bill be 
curved or straight, the upper mandible overlaps the under one on both 
sides, and thus forms an admirable protection for the delicate double- 
tubed tongue. If we examine the extraordinarily lengthened bill of 
Docimastes ensifer and the short feeble bill of the Lesbia Gouldi, we 
see the extremes as regards the length of this organ ; and we are net 
less astonished at the functions they are both intended to perform. The 
bill of the D. ensifer, which is nearly six inches long, and which 
contains a tongue capable of being protruded nearly as far beyond its 


tip, is most admirably fitted for the exploration of the lengthened_ 


and pendent corollas of the Brugmansie; while the short-billed Lesbie | 
cling to the upper portion of those flowers, pierce their bases, and — 
with the delicate feelers at the extremities of the tongue, readily | 


secure the insects which there abound. I have been assured by M. 


Bourcier that this is really a practice of the bird, and that it fre- | 
quently resorts to this device for the purpose of gaining its insect | 


food; but I suspect that, besides exploring the stalwart Brugmansia, 
a more delicate flora is the object for which its bill is especially 
formed. In no part of America are so many tubular-flowered plants 
as among the Andes, and the greater number of the Humming- 
Birds found there have straight and lengthened bills, such as the 
members of the genera Helianthea, Bourcieria, Celigena, etc. The 
arched bills of the Phaéthornithes are admirably adapted for securing 
the insects which resort to the leaves of trees, and upon which these 
birds are said to exist. But how much are we astonished, when 
we examine the bill of Hutoveres! and find this organ curved down- 
wards beyond the extent of a semicircle, a form beautifully adapted 
for exploring the scale-covered stems of the larger palms. 

Let us turn to another genus of this group—Grypus. Here the 
bill is not only armed with a strong hook at the end of the man- 
dibles, but with a row of numerous and thickly set teeth. The G. 
nevius is said to frequent the borders of the great forests, and to gain 
its food from among the interstices of the bark of the palm trees, 
Both this bird and the utoweres, aswell as the Phaéthornithes, aresaid 
(and, I believe, with truth) to feed principally upon spiders; and we 
know that these are the food of the Grypus. All the members of the 
genus Ramphomicron are said to feed on insects which inhabit the 

c2 


ait mereee 


16 


alpine Flore; and their bill is well suited to the capture of the minute 
insects found in those elevated regions. In some instances the bill 
is perfectly wedge-shaped, as in Heliothrix ; while in others it sud- 
denly turns upwards, as in dvocettula. ‘These forms are also adapted 
for some special purpose, of which, however, at present we are igno- 
rant. Besides these, there are others whose bills approach somewhat 
to the form of the flycatchers, as the dithurus. This bird we know 
frequently seizes insects on the wing; and so doubtless do many of 
the others. It will have been seen that all these forms of bill are 
well suited for the capture of insects; and, as might be supposed, 
insects constitute the principal food of the Humming-Bird; but that 
liquid honey, the pollen and other saccharine parts of flowers are also 
partaken of is evident from the double tubular tongue with which 
all the species are provided. Besides this they readily and greedily 
accept this kind of food when offered to them in a state of captivity, 
or when the corollas of a bouquet of flowers placed in a window are 
filled with sugar to entice them to approach ; and from my own ex- 
perience I know that they have been kept in captivity for several 
months upon this kind of food. 

Connected intimately with the mode of flight is the form and 
structure of the tail, and in no group of birds is this organ more 
varied ; in some species it is four times the length of the body, in 
others it is so extremely short as to be entirely hidden by the coverts. 
Ais cases in point I may mention Lesbia Amaryllis and Calothoraa 
micrurus. HKvery Humming-Bird, however, has ten tail-feathers, and 
no more. Iam aware that this number is not apparent in some of 
the smaller fork-tailed species, the two centre-feathers being so ex- 
ceedingly minute as to be almost obsolete; but if a careful exami- 
nation be made, that number will be found. I may instance 
Thaumastura Core, T. enicura, and Calothorax Fannie. 

The tail appears to be, and doubtless is, a very important organ in 
all the aérial movements of the Trochilide; and accordingly we find 
very great variations in its form among the many different genera of 
which the family is composed. In Cometes and Lesbia, the forked 
character is carried to its maximum, while its minimum is seen in Ca- 
lothorax, Acestrura, and the allied groups. The tails of all the mem- 
bers of the two former and many other genera are of this form ; while 
in others it is only seen in a single species of a group, all the other 
members of which have rounded, square, or cuneate tails. As a case 
in point I may cite Hupetomena hirundinacea, among the Campy- 
loptert, which may be regarded as the aérial type of its own particular 
group. Next to this we may notice the species with feathers termi- 
nating in spatules, such as Loddigesia, Spathura, etc. I was informed 
by the late Mr. Dyson that the flight of these birds presents a 
marked difference from that of other Humming-Birds, and that their 
appearance in the air is most singular,—the tail being not only con- 
stantly opened and shut, but the spatules always in motion, par- 
ticularly when the bird is poising over a flower; and if this be 
really true, what an extraordinary appearance must the Loddigesia 
mirabilis present during its evolutions! But we cannot attempt to 


17 


describe it; the discovery of a second. example,.and the peculiarity 
of its flight, must be left for future historians to make known to us. 

In some few instances, such as Juliamyia typica and Campylopte- 
rus Pampa, the tails are cuneate ; but this form is quite exceptional 
if we exclude the Phaéthornithes and Eutoxeres, in which this is the 
prevailing form. Besides the groups with forked or cuneate tails, 


there are others in which this organ 1s square OF rounded, as in 
the Florisuge and Metallure. The reverse of the spatulate form 
occurs in some species, such as the members of the genus Gouldia, 
in which the tip of the outer tail-feathers terminates in thread-like 
filaments. The citation of one more will be sufficient to show how 
widely different is the form of this organ among the various genera. 
The outer feathers of the Oreotrochili are narrow, rigid, and turned. 
inwards: this calliper-like form one might suppose would assist, in 
combination with the lengthened hind toe and claw, in supporting the 
bird on the sides of rocks; and we find that this is really the case ; for 
Mr. Fraser informs me that he has seen several of the Oreotrochilus 
Pichincha clinging, half-benumbed with cold, on a ledge of rocks 
during one of the frequent snow-storms which occur on Pichincha. 
Quinarians would pronounce this to be the scansorial type among 
Humming-Birds. Now I think we may fairly infer that many of 
the other structures above alluded to are equally adapted for some 
peculiar purpose; yet there must be exceptions to this hypothesis, — 
since the structure of the caudal feathers is in many instances totally | 
different in the two sexes of the same species. 

Nothing has yet been said respecting the legs and feet. Diminutive 
as they are, they will be found to be very diversified. In some instances 
the tarsi are bare, in others they are thickly clothed, as in the Erio- 
cnemides ; in some the toes are very diminutive, and are furnished with 
equally small, rounded nails; in others all the toes, particularly the 
hinder one, are greatly developed and armed with long, curved, and 
extremely sharp, spine-like claws. This latter form is admirably 
adapted for clinging to the petals of flowers—a habit common to 
many members of the family, which not only settle upon, but thrust 
their spiny bills through the bell-shaped flowers. ‘The power these 
little birds possess of clinging to the branches is very remarkable : 
they hang on with their little feet and hooked claws like bats, with 
such pertinacity that I was often fearful of dislucating the legs of 
my living birds when attempting to remove them from their perch. 

I may mention here, although somewhat out of place, that the 
skins of Pterophanes Temminckt have a strong musky smell, very 
similar to that exhaled by the Petrels. I consider this merely a 
coincidence; for although I am aware that many species of Humming- 
Birds fly close to the surface of water, they are merely hawking for 
insects among the aquatic plants peculiar to such situations. 

It is the great diversity of forms in this family of birds which 
renders the study of them so very interesting. If these little ob- 
jects were magnified to the size of Hagles, their structural differences 
would stand out in very bold relief, and the many marked generic 
distinctions they present would be far more clearly perceptible, 


\ 
| 


18 


The members of most of the genera have certain parts of their 
plumage fantastically decorated; and in many instances most re- 


. Splendent in colour. My own opinion is, that this gorgeous colour- 


\ ing of the Humming-Birds has been given for the mere purpose of 

| ornament, and for no other purpose of special adaptation in their 
| mode of life—in other words, that ornament and beauty merely as 
such was the end proposed—especially when we remember that the 
plumage of Humming-Birds seems to follow a general rule in the 

subordination and contrast with which the colours are arranged. 
These extraordinary developments are nearly always confined to the 
male, and are, doubtless, bestowed upon these little gems as a gorgeous 
train is given to the Peacock, beautiful markings to the Polyplectron, 
&c. I know of no others but the two species of the genus Cephalepis 
in which a single feather is made to serve the purpose of ornament. 
In all other instances the feathers are disposed in pairs, or in equal 
number on either side of the head or body, as the case may be ; but 
in both these species the crest terminates in a single plume, which 
greatly adds to the elegance of the slender topping. How splendid 
are the spangles which deck the neck-plumes of the Lophornithes! and 
how well do the blue ear-tufts of the Petasophore harmonize with 
the surrounding greeh of the neck! The genera Oxypogon and 
Ramphomicron may be cited as singular instances of ornamentation ; 
for they are both bearded and crested. Independently of these extra- 
developed portions of the plumage, certain parts of the body are 
gorgeously coloured; and here, again, some curious features are 
observable. In very many instances the crowns are truly resplendent, 
as in Heliodoxa; while in Helianthea the forehead only is decorated 
with a star brighter than Venus, the queen-of planets. 

All the members of the genus Heliangelus:.are remarkable for 
their beautiful gorgets, succeeded by acrescent of white separating it 
from the green of the under surface. Some species of the Erio- 
enemides, beside their thickly clothed tarsi, have rich and luminous 
upper tail coverts; while others, such as the Erioenemis Aline, have 
the under tail-coverts unsurpassingly brilliant and beautiful. The 
members of the genus Auyastes are conspicuous for the shining, metal- 
like masks with which their faces are adorned ; while, differing from 
all these, the Agleactines have the lower part of their backs clothed 

in armour-like feathers, the brilliancy of which must be seen to be 
understood, but which, strange to say, is only apparent when viewed 
from behind; for if looked at in the direction of the feather, none 


19 


of these hues ‘are perceptible. Many more instances besides these 
might be mentioned ; but a reference to the plates on which they are 
represented, or, still better, the birds themselves, will give a more 
correct idea of these remarkable colourings than can be conveyed by 
any description. ‘ 

Before leaving the subject of extra development, I may mention | 
that I often find it carried to a greater extent in some one species of a 
genus than in the others. I will give an example of what I here 
intend, by reference to what is observable in another family of birds, 
the Trogonide. Tere the extra development of the upper tail- 
coverts which occurs in members of the genus Pharomacrus, com- 
mences in the P. pavoninus, increases in the P. antisianus, and 
extends beyond the tail in P. auriceps ; but no species with upper 
tail-coverts of intermediate length between those of the last-mentioned 
species and the immensely long plumes of P. paradiseus, appears to - 
exist. In like manner among the Andean Humming-Birds there is a 
tendency to a gradual increase in the length of the bill to the extent of 
two or two and a half inches ; but no species has yet been seen in which 
that organ is intermediate between that length and the extraordi-: 
narily developed bill of Docimastes, which measures at least five 
inches. A similar fact is also observable with respect to the spa- 
tules in the Spathure. 

Apart from development, I observe that in the Humming-Birds, as 


in some other groups to which I have paid particular attention, the f 


species of one genus are much more numerous than those of others, 
and that, whenever this is the case, the genus usually comprises 
many closely allied species. 

Among the most pleasing recollections of our youthful days is that of 
a birds’ nest. Where is the person who has lived in the country and 
paid any attention to natural history, that does not recollect that 
of the Hedge-Sparrow (Accentor modularis) with its beautiful blue 
eges; or has he ever ceased to wonder at the surprising construction 
of the nest of the Bottle-Tit (Mecistura caudata)? Their domestic 
architecture is indeed among the most interesting of the many singu- 
lar features in the economy of birds; and how truly wonderful are 
some of the nests of the Humming-Birds! In form and size 
they vary as much as the different structures of the birds would 
lead us to expect, and a similar difference occurs in the situations 
in which they are placed. Some of these cradles are not larger than 
the half of a walnut-shell, and these coracle-shaped structures are 
among the neatest and most beautiful. The members of the | 
Trochilus and their allies’ expend the greatest ingenuity, not so 
much in their constructions i the lavish decoration of theit outer \/ 
walls; with the utmost ‘taste do these birds instinctively fasten | 
thereon beautiful pieces of flat lichen, the larger pieces in the middle 
and the smaller on the part attached to the branch. Itis-a-question 
among omithologists whether-these adornments~are fixed on-by a 
glutinous secretion from the bird or by the invisible webs of some of the 
smaller kinds of spiders ; my own belief is, that-the latter is the means 
employed. Nowand then a pretty feather is intertwined or fastened 


Z,. 
Mow 


20 


to the outer side, the stem being always so placed that the feather 
stands out beyond the surface. These little cup-shaped nests are 
frequently placed on the bifurcation of the horizontal part of a branch 
near the ground, and at other times higher up towards the summit. 
Quite the reverse of this kind of nest are those built by the Phaé- 
thornithes: these latter are generally very frail structures, woven round 
and attached to the side of a drooping palm-leaf, very frequently 
overhanging water. Such a nest is figured in my plate of P. Eury- 
nome. Another of a similar form but of different materials is figured 
in the same volume in the plate illustrative of P. Eremita, with two 
young ones therein. 

Other Humming-Birds suspend their nests to the sides of rocks. 
These are hammock-shaped in form, and are most ingeniously 
attached to the face of the rock by means of spiders’ webs and the 
cottony materials of which they are sometimes built, Those made 
by the Oreotrochili, are very large, and composed of wool, llama 
hair, moss, and feathers; at the top of this great mass, of nearly 
the size of a child’s head, is a little cup-shaped depression in 
which the eggs are deposited. Respecting the nest made by the Oreo- 
trochilus Pichincha, my friend Professor Jameson, of Quito, writes, “On 
the first of the present month (November 1858), I visited the snowy 
mountain of Antisana in company with the American Minister. In 
the celebrated farm-house (about 13,500 feet above the sea) I found in 
one of the lower or ground apartments, unprovided with a door, several 
nests of Oreotrochilus Pichincha, one of which was attached to a straw 
rope suspended from the roof. Iam quite certain as to the identity of 
the species, having shot one of the birds. The rest will be sent to you 
in my next parcel.” See the figure of this nest given by Dr. Sclater 
in the ‘ Proceedings of the Zoological Society,’ 1860, p. 80. 

Some of the Humming-Birds, and perhaps this very species, are 
said to suspend their great nests by the middle from the fine hanging 
root of a tree, or a tendril; and should the nest, which is of a curved 
form and built of any coarse materials at hand, prove to be heavier 
on one side than the other, the higher side is weighted with a small 
stone or square piece of earth until an equilibrium is established and 
the eggs prevented from rolling out. If such powers so nearly ap- 
proaching to that of reason should be doubted by some of my readers, 
I can assure them that one or more of these loaded nests are con- 
tained in the Loddigesian Collection; and one is at this moment 
before me, an examination of which will satisfy the most sceptical of 
the truth of this statement. Occasionally the old nests are repaired 
or built over the old one, two, three or more years in succession. 
Many other instances might be given to show that the nidification 
of the Humming-Birds is as singular as are the birds themselves. I 
believe that generally the eggs are two in number, but I also think 
it likely that some of the Phaéthornithes, or rather the members of 
the genus Glaucis, occasionally lay but one; for I have frequently 
seen only a single young bird in the nests sent to this country, and 
this single bird generally filled up the entire space of the frail 
structure, which, as I have before stated, is usually attached to the 


ae es 


21 


leaflet of a palm. The eggs are certainly large when we consider 
the tiny size of the birds which produce them ; in shape they are 
oblong, nearly alike in form at both ends, and are probably of a 
pinkish hue before their contents are removed; after which they 
become of an opaque white, and so closely resemble bon-bons that 
they might easily be mistaken for them. The birds are said to pro- 
duce two broods a year ; and the period of incubation generally oc- 
cupies about twelve or fourteen, or, according to Captain Lyon, 
eighteen days. This gentleman, when giving an account of some 
Humming-Birds whose hatching and education he sedulously watched, 
as the nest was made in a little orange-bush by the side of a fre- 
quented walk in his garden at Gongo Soco, in Brazil, states that the 
nest “was composed of the silky down of a plant, and covered with 
small flat species of yellow lichen. The first egg was laid January 
26th, the second on the 28th; and two little creatures like bees made 
their appearance on the morning of February 14th. As the young 
increased in size, the mother built her nest higher and higher. The 
old bird sat very close during a continuance of heavy rain for several 
days and nights. The young remained blind until February 28th, 
and flew on the morning of March 7th, without previous practice, as 
strong and swiftly as the mother, taking their first dart from the nest 
to a tree about twenty yards distant.” 

Let me now mention one of the devices employed for the discovery 
of the nest of the Humming-Birds. Every observer who has written 
upon them has not failed to descant upon their boldness and pugnacity : 
not only do they attack birds of much larger size than themselves, but 
it is even asserted that they will tilt at the Eagle if he approaches 
within the precinctsof the nest ; nor is man exempt from their assaults, 
of which an amusing instance will be found in the extract from Lady 
Emmeline Stuart Wortley’s ‘Travels’ given on a subsequent page. 

It is this readiness for combat which is taken advantage of to find 
the nest and eggs, and all that is necessary is to tie a string to your 
hat, and wave it round your head, when, if a female be sitting in the 
neighbourhood, the male wili instantly come down upon you; and by 
watching his return the nest may be detected. 

Many really absurd statements have been made as to the means 
by which these birds are obtained for our cabinets. It is most fre- 
quently asserted that they are shot with water or with sand. Now, so 
far as I am aware, these devices are never resorted to, but they are 
usually procured in the ordinary ‘way, with numbers ten and eleven 
shot, those being the sizes best suited for the purpose. If smaller shot 
be used, the plumage is very frequently so cut and damaged that the 
Specimen is rendered of little or no value. By far the greater number 
fall to the clay ball of the blowpipe, which the Indians, and in some 
instances even Europeans use with perfect certainty of aim. My 
friend Professor Jameson has a son who appears to be a proficient in 
this mode of obtaining Humming-Birds, as I know that many of the 
specimens he has sent me have been thus procured. 

In Brazil very fine nets are employed for this purpose, but how: 
this engine is employed I am unable to state ; unfortunately for me 


22 


many specimens of the fine species Cometes sparganurus in my pos- 
session have been obtained by means of birdlime, and this is evidently 
the way in which these birds are captured in the neighbourhood of 
Chuquisaca. 

That the Humming-Bird is not altogether denied the power of 
song we learn from the notices respecting its vocalization by various 
authors; but as this is a point upon which I cannot speak from 
personal observation, I shall take the liberty of quoting from those 
who have written on the subject. To begin with the remarks of 
my friend Mr. W. C. L. Martin :— 

“It is not to the most beautiful birds that the voice of melody is 
given. The Mocking-Bird, the Nightingale, and the Thrush, are but 
plainly attired; and it would appear that if Nature be lavish in one 
respect, she is parsimonious in another. On the Humming-Birds she 
has bestowed the gift of heauty—she has created them winged gems— 
she has chased their plumage with burnished metals or overspread it 
with laminze of topaz and emerald—she has strained, so to speak, at 
every variety of effect—she has revelled in an infinitude of modifi- 
cations, whether we look at the hues or the development of the 
feathering. We can scarcely, then, expect that, to such an external 
perfection, the gift of song will be also added; and, indeed, when we 
reflect upon the structure of the tongue, of the os hyoides which 
supports its base, and of the mechanism by which it is rendered 
capable of protrusion, remembering that the os hyoides is connected 
with the larynx, we cannot in reason suppose that these birds can be 
eminent as songsters. Nevertheless it would appear that some species 
at least utter, while perched, a sort of querulous warble. 

“The ordinary cry of the Humming-Birds is sharp and shrill, 
generally uttered on the wing, and frequently reiterated by the males 
during their combats with each other. It is principally, says Lesson, 
in passing from one place to another, that their ery, which he likens 
to the syllables ¢ére-tére, articulated with more or less force, is ex- 
cited. Most frequently, he says, they are completely dumb; and 
he adds that he has passed whole hours in observing them in the 
forests of Brazil without having heard the slightest sound proceed 
from their throats.”’ 

Mr. Gosse, in his ‘ Birds of Jamaica,’ speaking of a species which 
he calls the Vervain Humming-Bird (the Mellisuga minima of this 
work), says, “The present is the only Humming-Bird that I am ac- 
quainted with that has a real song. Soon after sunrise, in the spring 
months, it is fond of sitting on the topmost branch of a mango or 
orange-tree, where it warbles in a very weak, but very sweet tone, a 
continuous melody for ten minutes at a time; it has little variety. 
The others only utter a pertinacious chirping.” 

It will be expected that some remarks should now be made with 
regard to the luminous character of certain parts of the plumage 
of these charming birds—a point which has engaged the attention 
of many naturalists and physiologists, but of which I believe 
no very satisfactory solution has yet been attained. “A few days 
since,” says Mr, Martin, “we were examining a Humming-Bird, the 


23 


gorget of which was an intense emerald-green, but on changing the 
light (that is altering its angle of incidence) the emerald was changed. 
into velvet-black. Audebert considered this changeableness to be 
due to the organization of the feathers, and to the manner in which 
the luminous rays are reflected on falling upon them ; and of this 
we think there ean be little doubt, for each feather, when minutely 
inspected, exhibits myriads of little facets so disposed as to present 
so many angles to the incidence of light, which will be diversely 
reflected according to the position of the feather, and im some 
positions not reflected in any sensible degree, and thus emerald may 
become a velvet-black. _ 

“ Lesson supposes that the brilliant hues of the plumage of the 
Humming-Birds are derived from some elements contained in the 
blood, and elaborated by the circulation—a theory we do not 
quite understand, inasmuch as colour is the result of the reflection 
of some rays and the absorption of others, caused by the arrange- 
ment of the molecules of any given body. He adds, however, that 
the texture of the plumes plays the principal part, in consequence of 
the manner in which the rays of light traverse them, or are reflected 
by the innumerable facets which a prodigious quantity of barbules or 
fibres present. All the scaly feathers, he observes, which simulate 
velvet, the emerald, or the ruby, and which we see on the head and 
throat of the Epimachi (as the Grand Promerops of New Guinea), 
the Paradise-Birds, and the Humming-Birds, resemble each other in 
the uniformity of their formation; all are composed of cylindrical 
barbules, bordered with other analogous regular barbules, which, in 
their turn, support other small ones, and all of them are hollowed in 
the centre with a deep furrow, so that when the light, as Audebert 
first remarked, glides in a vertical direction over the scaly feathers, 
the result is that all the luminous rays are absorbed in traversing 
them, and the perception of black is produced. But it is no longer 
the same when the light is reflected from these feathers, each of 
which performs the office of areflector; then it is that the aspect of 
the emerald, the ruby, &c. varying with the utmost diversity under 
the incidences of the rays which strike them, is given out by the 
molecular arrangement of the barbules. It is thus that the gorget 


of many species takes all the hues of green, and then the brightest 


and most uniformly golden tints down to intense velvet-black, or, 
on the contrary, that of ruby, which darts forth pencils of light, or 
passes from reddish orange to a crimsoned red-black. 

“It is thus, we think, that the everchanging hues of the gorgets 
of the Humming-Birds from black to emerald, ruby, crimson, or 


: s 29 
flame colour are to be explained. 


In a note just received from Dr. Davy, dated Ambleside, June 10, 
1861, that gentleman says :—“ I have examined with the microscope 
the feathers of the Humming-Bird, Agleactis cupripennis, you en- 
trusted to me, which is so remarkable for its rich colours as seen in 
one direction, and only one. The result is merely the following— 
viz., that those feathers in which this peculiarity is most strongly 
marked are membranous, terminating in pointed filaments, set on 


24 


obliquely, so that looking from the head each feather is only par- 
tially seen. This result, I apprehend, will help very little to account 
for the peculiarity in question. Its explanation’ must be sought 
(must it not?) inthe higher optics.” 

“As to the question you ask me about the beautiful play of colours 
in the Humming-Birds,” says Dr. Stevelly, **T have never studied 
the subject, and I should greatly fear to say anything about it, par- 
ticularly if what I said were to be looked on as of any authority. 

“There are two optical principles only which I can see to be any 
way concerned in such an effect. One is the cause of the play of 
colours in mother-of-pearl, and which Brewster proved to arise from 
very fine striated rulings, the distance between the parallel lines not 
being greater than from the 10,000th to the 100,000th of an inch. 
Barton, of Birmingham, imitated this by ruling very fine parallel 
lines on steel dies, and then impressing these on buttons, which 
showed very beautiful colours when exposed to strong light. The 
other optical principle, which I think, however, to be the most likely 
to produce the effect in the case of feathers, is the influence of thin 
plates. If you know Mr. Gassiot (one of your leading Royal Insti- 
tution savants) get him to show you some of his copper-plates, on 
which by an electrotype process he has had very thin films of lead 
deposited ; and I think you will see colours fully as beautiful, though 
not as varied or as variable in different aspects as those of the Hum- 
ming-Bird,”’ j 

It may not be out of place now to give a few extracts from the 
works of those authors who have written on the Trochilide in gene- 
ral or on some particular species. A perusal of these will tend to 
confirm much that I have said ; and it is but fair that the writings of 
those who have wielded the pen in elucidation of the history, habits, 
and manners of these lovely birds should be duly recognized, 

It is fortunate for the science of Ornithology that so many persons 
gifted with the power of expressing their ideas in elegant and poetical 
Janguage should have bestowed a large share of their attention upon 
the Humming-Bird. The writings of Buffon, Wilson, Waterton, 
Audubon, Gosse, and others, treating exclusively on natural history, 
are not, perhaps, so generally known as they ought to be; the 
extracts from these authors will therefore, I doubt not, be found of 
interest. 

“ Of all animated beings,” says Buffon, “ this is the most elegant 
in form and the most brilliant’ in colour. The stones and metals 
polished by art are not comparable to this gem of nature: she has 
placed it in the order of birds, but among the tiniest of the race— 
maxime miranda in minimis; she has loaded it with all the gifts of 
which she has only given other birds a share. Agility, rapidity, 
nimbleness, grace, and rich attire, all belong to this little favourite, 
The emerald, the ruby, and the topaz, glitter in its garb, which is 
never soiled with the dust of earth ; for, leading an aérial life, it rarely 
touches the turf even for an instant. Always in the air flying from 
flower to flower, it shares their freshness and their splendour, lives 
on their nectar, and only inhabits those climates in which they are 


25 


unceasingly renewed. ‘The Humming-Bird seems to follow the sun, 
to advance, to retire with him, and to fly on the wings of the wind 
in pursuit of an eternal spring.” 

“* Nature in every department of her works,” says Wilson, *‘ seems 
to delight in variety; and the present subject is almost as singular 
for its minuteness, beauty, want of song, and manner of feeding, as 
the preceding (the Mocking-Bird) is for unrivalled excellence of 
notes and plainness of plumage. This is one of the few birds that 
are universally beloved ; and amidst the sweet dewy serenity of a 
Summer’s morning, his appearance among the arbours of honey- 
suckles and beds of flowers is truly interesting. 


« When morning dawns, and the blest sun again 
Lifts his red glories from the eastern main, 
Then through our woodbines, wet with glittering dews, 
The flower-fed Humming-Bird his round pursues ; 
Sips with inserted tube the honied blooms, 
And chirps his gratitude as round he roams ; 
While richest roses, though in crimson drest, 
Shrink from the splendour of his gorgeous breast. 
What heavenly tints in mingling radiance fly! 
Each rapid movement gives a different dye ; 
Like scales of burnished gold they dazzling show— 
Now sink to shade, now like a furnace glow!” 


‘«‘ Where is the person,’’ says Audubon, speaking of the Trochilus 
colubris, ‘‘ who, on seeing this lovely little creature moving on hum- 
ming winglets through the air, suspended as if by magic in it, flit- 
ting from one flower to another, with motions as graceful as they are 
light and airy, pursuing its course and yielding new delights wherever 
it is seen—where is the person, I ask, who, on observing this glitter- 
ing fragment of the rainbow, would not pause, admire, and turn his 
mind with reverence towards the Almighty Creator, the wonders of 
whose hand we at every step discover, and of whose sublime concep- 
tions we everywhere observe the manifestations in his admirable 
system of creation? There breathes not such a person; so kindly 
have we all been blessed with that intuitive and noble feeling— 
admiration. 

‘I wish it were in my power to impart to you, kind reader, the 
pleasures which I have felt while watching the movements and viewing 
the manifestations of feelings displayed by a single pair of these most 
favourite little creatures, when engaged in the demonstration of their 
love for each other ;—how the male swells his plumage and throat, 
and, dancing on the wing, whirls around the delicate female ; how 
quickly he dives towards a flower, and returns with a loaded bill, 
which he offers to her to whom alone he desires to be united ; how 
full of ecstacy he seems to be when his caresses are kindly received ; 
how his little wings fan her as they fan the flowers, and he transfers 
to her bill the insect and the honey which he has procured with a 
View to please her ; how these attentions are received with apparent 
Satisfaction; how, soon after, the blissful compact is sealed; how, then, 
the courage and care of the male is redoubled ; how he even dares 


26 


to give chase to the tyrant Flycatcher, hurriés the Blue-Bird and the 
Martin to their boxes ; and how, on sounding pinions, he joyously 
returns to the side of his lovely mate. Reader, all these proofs 
of the sincerity, fidelity, and courage with which the male assures 
his mate of the care he will take of her while sitting on her nest, 
may be seen, have been seen, but cannot be pourtrayed or de- 
scribed. 

“ Could you cast a momentary glance on the nest of the Humming- 
Bird and see, as I have seen, the newly hatched pair of young, little 
larger than humble-bees, naked, blind, and so feeble ag scarcely to be 
able to raise their little bill to receive food from the parents ; and 
could you see those parents full of anxiety and fear, passing and re- 
passing within a few inches of your face, alighting on a twig not more 
than a yard from your body, waiting the result of your unwelcome 
visit in a state of the utmost despair, you could not fail to be im- 
pressed with the interest of the scene. “Then how pleasing it is, on 
your leaving the spot, to see the returning hope of the parents when, 
after examining the nest, they find their nestlings untouched ! These 
are the scenes best fitted to enable us to partake of sorrow and joy, 
and to determine every one who views them to make it his study to 
contribute to the happiness of others, and to refrain from wantonly 
or maliciously giving them pain. 

“ A person standing in a garden by the side of a common Althea 
in bioom, will be surprised to hear the humming of their wings, and 
then see the birds themselves within a few feet of him, as he will be 
astonished at the rapidity with which the little creatures rise into the 
air, and are out of sight and hearing the next moment. 

“No bird seems to resist their attacks; but they are sometimes 
chased by the larger kinds of humble-bees, of which they seldom take 
the least notice, as their superiority of flight is sufficient to enable 
them to leave those slow-moving insects far behind in the short space 
of a minute. 

“If comparison might enable you to form some tolerably accurate 
idea of their peculiar mode of flight, and their appearance when on the 
wing, I should say that, were both objects of the same colour, a large 
Sphinz or moth when moving from one flower to another, and in a 
direct line, comes nearer the Humming-Bird in aspect than any other 
object with which I am acquainted.”’— Audubon, Ornithological Bio- 
graphy, vol. i. p. 248, &e. For the other portions of Wilson’s and 
Audubon’s very interesting observations, I must refer my readers to 
my account of Trochilus colubris. 

“Though least in size,” remarks Mr. Waterton, “ the glittering 
mantle of the Humming-Bird entitles it to the first place in the list 
of the birds of the New World. It may truly be called the Bird of 
Paradise ; and had it existed in the Old World it would have claimed 
the title, instead of the bird which has now the honour to bear it. 
See it darting through the air almost as quick as thought !—now 
it is within a yard of your face !—in an instant it is gone !—now it 
flutters from flower to flower to sip the silver dew—it is now a rub 
—now a topaz—now an emerald—now all burnished gold! It would 


27 


be arrogant to pretend to describe this winged gem of nature after 
Buffon’s elegant description of it. 

‘Cayenne and Demerara produce the same Humming-Birds. 
Perhaps you would wish to know something of their haunts. Chiefly 
in the months of July and August, the tree called Bois Immortel, 
very common in Demerara, bears abundance of red blossom, which 
stays on the tree for some weeks ; then it is that most of the species 
of Humming-Birds are very plentiful. The wild red sage (Salvia 
splendens) is also their favourite shrub ; and they buzz like bees round 
the blossom of the Wallaba-tree ; indeed there is scarce a flower in 
the interior, or on the sea-coast, but what receives frequent visits from 
one or other of the species. 

** On entering the forests of the rising land in the interior, the blue 
and green, the smallest brown, no bigger than the humble-bee, with 
two long feathers in the tail, and the little forked-tail purple-throated 
Humming-Birds glitter before you in everchanging attitudes. 

“Ags you advance towards the mountains of Demerara, other 
Species of Humming-Birds present themselves before you. It seems 
to be an erroneous opinion that the Humming-Bird lives entirely on 
honey-dew. Almost every flower of the tropical climate contains in- 
sects of one kind or other ; now the Humming-Bird is most busy 
about the flowers an hour or two after sun-rise, and after a shower 
of rain; and it is just at this time that the insects come out to 
the edge of the flower in order that the sun’s rays may dry the 
nocturnal dew and rain which they have received. On opening the 
stomachs of the Humming-Bird dead insects are almost always found 
there.”’ 

“The Humming-Birds in Jamaica,” says Lady Emmeline Stuart 
Wortley in her Travels, “are lovely little creatures, and most won- 
derfully tame and fearless of the approach of man. One of these 
charming feathered jewels had built its delicate nest close to one 
of the walks of the garden belonging to the house where we were 
staying. ‘The branch, indeed, of the beautiful little shrub in which 
this fairy nest was suspended almost intruded into the walk; and 
every time we sauntered by there was much danger of sweeping 
against this projecting branch with its precious charge, and doing it 
some injury, as very little would have demolished the exquisite 
fabric ; m process of time, two lovely little pear-like eggs had ap- 
peared; and while we were there we had the great pleasure of seeing 
the minute living gems themselves appear, looking like two very 
small bees. The mother-bird allowed us to look closely at her in 
the nest, and to inspect her little nurslings, when she was flying 
about near, without appearing in the least degree disconcerted or 
alarmed. I never saw so tame or so bold a little pet. But she did 
not allow the same liberties to be taken by everybody unchecked. 
One day, as Sir C was walking in the pretty path beside which 
the fragile nest was delicately suspended amid sheltering leaves, he 
paused, in order to look at its Lilliputian inhabitants. While thus 
engaged, he felt suddenly a sharp light rapping on the crown of his 
hat, which considerably surprised him. He looked round to ascer- 


28 


tain from whence the singular and unexpected attack proceeded : but 
nothing was to be seen. Almost thinkmg he must have been mis- 
taken, he continued his survey; when a much sharper and louder 
rat-tat-tat-tat-tat seemed to demand his immediate attention, and a 
little to jeopardize the perfect integrity and preservation of the fabric 
in question. Again he looked round, far from pleased at such extra- 
ordinary impertinence ; when what should he see but the beautiful 
delicate Humming-Bird, with ruffled feathers and fiery eyes, who 
seemed by no means inclined to let him off without a further infliction 
of sharp taps and admonitory raps from her fairy beak. She looked 
like a little fury in miniature—a winged Xantippe. Those pointed 
attentions apprised him that his company was not desired or accep- 
table ; and, much amused at the excessive boldness of the dauntless 
little owner of the exquisite nest he had been contemplating, Sir 
C moved off, anxious not to disturb or irritate further this 
valiant minute mother, who displayed such intrepidity and cool deter- 
mination. As to V and me, the darling little pet did not mind 
us in the least; she allowed us to watch her to our hearts’ content 
during the uninterrupted progress of all her little household and 
domestic arrangements, and rather appeared to like our society than 
not, and to have the air of saying, ‘Do you think I manage it well, 
eh ites 33 

“I cannot quit the subject,” says the Reverend Lansdown Guilding, 
“without speaking of the delight that was afforded me, in Jamaica, 
by seeing Humming-Birds feeding on honey in the florets of the 
great Aloe (Agave Americana, Linn.) On the side of a hill upon 
Sutton’s Estate (the property of Heury Dawkins, Esq.) were a con- 
siderable number of aloe plants, of which about a dozen were in full 
blossom. They were spread over aspace of about twenty yards square. 
The spikes bearing bunches of flowers in a thyrsus, were from twelve 
to fifteen feet high ; on each spike were many hundred flowers of 
a bright yellow colour, each floret of a tubular shape and containing 
a good-sized drop of honey. Such an assemblage of floral splendour 
was in itself most magnificent and striking; but it may be imagined 
how much the interest caused by this beautiful exhibition was in- 
creased by vast numbers of Humming-Birds, of various species flut- 
tering at the opening of the flowers, and dipping their bills first 
into one floret and then into another,—the sun, as usual, shining bright 
upon their varied and beautiful plumage. The long-tailed or Bird- 
of- Paradise Humming-Bird was particularly striking, its long feathers 
waving as it darted from one flower to another. I was so much de- 
lighted with this sight that I visited the spot again in the afternoon, 
after a very long and fatiguing day’s ride, accompanied by my wife, on 
horseback, when we enjoyed the scene before us for more than half- 
an-hour.” 

The pugnacity of the Humming-Birds,”’ remarks Mr. Gosse, “ has 
been often spoken of; two of one species can rarely suck flowers 
from the same bush without a rencontre. I once witnessed a com- 
bat between two, which was prosecuted with much pertinacity, and 
protracted to an unusual length. It was in the month of April, when 


29 


I was spending a few days at Phoemix Park, near Savannah la Mar, 
the residence of my kind friend Aaron Deleon, Esq. In the garden 
were two trees, of the kind called Malay Apple (Hugenia Malae- 
censis), one of which was but a yard or two from my window. The 
genial influence of the spring rains had covered them with a profu- 
sion of beautiful blossoms, each consisting of a multitude of crimson 
stamens, with very minute petals, like bunches of crimson tassels ; 

7 but the leaf-buds were only beginning to open. A Humming- Bird 
had every day and all day long been paying his devoirs to these 
charming blossoms. On the morning to which I allude another 
came, and the manceuvres of these two tiny creatures became very 
+ interesting. They chased each other through the labyrinths of twigs 

ic and flowers till, an opportunity occurring, the one would dart with 

1s seeming fury upon the other, and then, with a loud rustling of their 
wings, they would twirl together, round and round, till they nearly 
came to the earth.. It was some time before I could see, with any , 
distinctness, what took place in these tussles ; their twirlings were so \ 
rapid as to baffle all attempts at discrimination. At length an en- | 


counter took place pretty close to me, and I perceived that the beak 


of the one grasped the beak of the other, an ‘thus fastened both 


in triumph to the tree, where, perched on a lofty twig, he chirped | 
monotonously and pertinaciously for some time—I could not help 
thinking in defiance. In a few minutes, however, the banished one 

returned and began chirping no less provokingly, which soon brought ° 
on another chase and another tussle. I am persuaded that these 
were hostile encounters ; for one seemed evidently afraid of the other, 
fleeing when the other pursued, though his indomitable spirit would 
prompt the chirp of defiance ; and when resting after a battle, I 
noticed that this one held his beak open, as if panting. Sometimes: 
they would suspend hostilities to suck a few blossoms, but mutual 

proximity was sure to bring them on again, with the same result. m) 

4 In their tortuous and rapid evolutions the light from their ruby necks i 

would occasionally flash in the sun with gem-like radiance ; and as | 

they now and then hovered motionless, the broadly expanded tail, 

the outer feathers of which are crimson-purple, but when intercepting 

the sun’s rays transmit orange-coloured light, added much to their 

beauty. A little Banana Quit (Certhiola flaveola), that was peeping 

among the blossoms in his own quiet way, seemed now and then to 

look with surprise on the combatants ; but when the one had driven 

his rival to a longer distance than usual, the vietor set upon the un- 

offending Quit, who soon yielded the point, and retired, humbly 

enough, to a neighbouring tree. The war (for it was a thorough 

campaign, a regular succession of battles) lasted fully an hour, and 

then I was called away from the post of observation. Both of the 
Humming-Birds appeared to be males.” 7 

* All the Humming-Birds have more oF less the habit, when in 


iy f | D 


om 


—— 


=e See 


ESOT BE SA IIE REG Sh ag 2S SS aa eee 


weak SSR SS 


30 


flight, of pausing in the air and throwing the body and tail into rapid 
and odd contortions. This is most observable in the Polytmus, from 
the effect that such motions have on the long feathers of the tail. That 
the object of these quick turns is the capture of insects I am sure, having 
watched one thus engaged pretty close tome. I observed it care- 
fully, and distinctly saw the minute flies in the air which it pursued 
and caught, and heard repeatedly the snapping of the beak. My 
presence scarcely disturbed it, if at all.” 

In some notes on the ‘Habits of the Humming-Birds of the 
Amazon,’ kindly furnished me by Mr. Wallace, that gentleman says— 

“The great number of species that frequent flowers, do so, I am 
convinced, for the small insects found there, and not for the nectar. 


_ In dozens, and perhaps hundreds, of common flower-frequenting 


species which I have examined, the crop, stomach, and intestines 
have been entirely filled with minute beetles, bees, ants, and spiders, 
which abound in most flowers in South America. Very rarely, in- 
deed, have I found a trace of honey or of any liquid in the crop or 
stomach. The flowers they most frequent are the various species of 
Inga, and the papilionaceous flowers of many large forest-trees. I 
have never seen them at the Bignonias or any flowers but those which 
grow in large masses covering a whole tree or shrub ; as they visit 
perhaps a hundred flowers ina minute and never stop at a single one. 
The little Emerald Hummer I have seen in gardens and at the com- 
mon orange Asclepias, which often covers large spaces of waste ground 
in the tropics. But there are many, such as Phaéthornis Eremita, 
and some larger allied species, which I have never seen at flowers. 
These inhabit the gloomy forest-shades, where they dart about among 


‘the foliage, and I have distinctly observed them visit in rapid succes- 


sion every leaf on a branch, balancing themselves vertically in the air, 
passing their beak closely over the under surface of each leaf, and thus 
capturing, no doubt, any small insects that may be upon them. 
While doing this the two long feathers of their tail have a vibrating 
motion, serving apparently as a rudder to assist them in performing 
the delicate operation. I have seen others searching up and down 
stems and dead sticks in the same manner, every now and then picking 
off something exactly as a Bush-strike, or a Tree-creeper does, with 
this exception that the Humming-Bird is constantly on the wing. 
They also capture insects in the true fissirostral manner. How often 
may they be seen perched on the dead twig of alofty tree—the same 
station that is chosen by the tyrant Flycatchers and the Jacamars, 
and from which, like those birds, they dart off a short distance and, 
after a few whirls and balancings, return to the identical twig they had 
left. In the evening too, just after sunset, when the Goat-suckers are 
beginning their search after insects over the rivers, I have seen Hum- 
ming-Birds come out of the forest and remain a long time on the 
wing, now stationary, now darting about with the greatest rapidity, 
imitating in a limited space the varied evolutions of their companions 
the Goat-suckers, and evidently for the same end and purpose. 
“‘Many naturalists have noticed this habit of feeding on insects, but 
have generally considered it as the exception, whereas I am inclined 


31 


to think it is the rule. The frequenting of flowers seems to me only 
one of the many ways by which they are enabled to procure their 
insect-food.”’ 


“ Wilson, Audubon, Mr. Gosse, and several others gifted with the. 


‘pen of a ready writer,’”’ says Mr. Alfred Newton, “ have so fully 
described, as far as words will admit, the habits of different members 
of the family Trochilida, that it is unnecessary to say much upon 
this score. ‘Their appearance is so entirely unlike that of any other 
birds, that it is hopeless to attempt in any way to bring a just con- 
ception of it to the ideas of those who have not crossed the Atlantie ; 
and even the comparison so often made between them and the Sphin- 
gide, though doubtless in the main true, is much to the advantage 
of the latter. One is admiring the clustering stars of a scarlet 
Cordia, the snowy cornucopias of a Portlandia, or some other brilliant 
and beautiful flower, when between the blossom and one’s eye sud- 
denly appears a small dark object, suspended as it were between four 
short black threads meeting each other in a cross. For an instant 
it shows in front of the flower; an instant more, it steadies itself, and 
one perceives the space between each pair of threads occupied by a 
grey film ; again another instant, and emitting a momentary flash of 
emerald and sapphire light, it is vanishing, lessening in the distance, 
as it shoots away, to a speck that the eye cannot take note of,—and 
all this so rapidly that the word on one’s lips is still unspoken, 
scarcely the thought in one’s mind changed. It was a bold man or 
an ignorant one who first ventured to depict Humming-Birds flying ; 
but it cannot be denied that representations of them in that attitude 
are often of special use to the ornithologist. The peculiar action of 
one, and probably many or all other species of the family, is such, 
that at times, in flying, it makes the wings almost meet, both in. 
front and behind, at each vibration. Thus when a bird chances to 
enter a room, it will generally go buzzing along the cornice: standing 
beneath where it is, one will find that the axis of the body is vertical, 
and each wing is describing a nearly perfect semicircle. As might. 
be expected, the pectoral muscles are very large ; indeed the sternum 
of this bird is a good deal bigger than that of the common Chimney 
Swallow (Hirundo rustica, L.). But the extraordinary rapidity 
with which the vibrations are effected seems to be chiefly caused by 
these powerful muscles acting on the very short wing-bones, which 
are not half the length of the same parts in the Swallow; and ac- 
cordingly great as this alar action is, and in spite of the contrary 
Opinion entertained by Mr. Gosse (Nat. Sojourn in Jamaica, 240), 
it is yet sometimes wanting in power, owing doubtless to the dis- 
advantageous leverage thus obtained ; and the old authors must be. 
credited who speak of cobwebs catching Humming-Birds. . 
“On the 3rd of May, 1857, a bird of this species” (Lulampis 
chlorolemus, Gould) “ flew into the room where I was sitting, and, 
after fluttering for some minutes against the ceiling, came in contact 
_ with a deserted spider’s web, in which it got entangled, and re- 
mained suspended and. perfectly helpless for more than a minute, 
when by a violent effort it freed itself. I soon after caught it, still 
D2 


32 


having fragments of the web on its head, neck, and wings ; and I 
teel pretty sure that had this web been inhabited and in good repair, 
instead of being deserted and dilapidated, the bird would never have 
escaped.” —A. N. : ; 

In his ‘Notes on the Humming-Birds of Guatemala,’ Mr. Salvin’ 
says, “ During the months of August and September the localities of 
the various species of Humming-Birds are usually as follows :— 
Among the trees on the south-eastern side of the lake” of Duejias 
“are Amazilia Devillei, Thaumastura henicura (mostly females), 
Campylopterus rufus, Heliomaster longirostris, Chlorostilbon Os- 
berti (in small number), Cyanomyia cyanocephala, and Trochilus 
colubris. 

“On the hill-side to the south-westward of the lake are great 
numbers of Campylopterus rufus, and among the willows close to the 
water the males of Thaumastura henicura congregate. About the 
Convolvulus-trees in the llafio at the foot of the volcano are found 
Eugenes fulgens, Amazilia Devillei, Thaumastura henicura (in small 
numbers), T'rochilus colubris (very commonly towards the end of 
September). 

“Entering the first barranco that opens out into the plain, we meet 
with Campylopterus rufus, Myiabeillia typica, H eliopedica melanotis, 
and a little higher up, Petasophora thalassina and Delattria viridi- 
pallens. Of course, occasionally a species is found not in its place as 
here indicated ; for instance, I have seen in the first locality a single 
specimen (the only female I have met with) of Eugenes fuigens, and 
another high in the voleano. I have also seen a single Petasophora 
thalassina out on the llafio. These localities must therefore be taken 
as only generally indicating the distribution of the species found 
about Duefas.”-—Jdis, vol. ii. p. 263. 

At the moment of printing these pages, I have received a very in- 
teresting letter from my friend the Hon. G. W. Allan, of Moss Park, 
Toronto, in which the following passage occurs respecting the Tro- 
chilus colubris :— 

“I wish you could have been with us last summer, you would have 
had an opportunity of watching your favourite Humming-Birds to 
your heart's content. I do not in the least exaggerate when I say that, 
during the time the horse-chestnuts were in flower, there were hundreds 
of these little tiny creatures about my grounds. While sitting in my li- 
brary I could hear their little sharp, querulous note, as the males fought 
like so many little bantam cocks with each other. On one large 
horse-chest.1ut tree, just at the corner of the house, they swarmed 
about the foliage like so many bees; and as the top branches of the 
tree were close to my bed-room windows, every now and then one 
bird, more bold than the rest, would dart into the open window and 
perch upon the wardrobe or the top of the bed-post.” 

It will be expected that, in a monograph of a group of birds which 
have attracted so much notice, some account should be given of their 
internal structure, and as our well-known bird-anatomist, T. C. Eyton, 
Eisq., who has paid much attention to the subject, has given a very 
clear description of that of the largest species of the family—the 


38 


Patagona gigas—in Mr: Darwin's Zoology of the Voyage of H. M. 8. 
Beagle,’ I have much pleasure in transferring it to my pages :— 

“Tongue bifid, each division pointed ; hyoids very long, in their 
position resembling those in the Picide (Woodpeckers) ; trachea of 
uniform diameter, destitute of muscles of voice ; bronchia very long ; 
cesophagus funnel-shaped, slightly contracted on approachmg the 
proventriculus, which is small and scarcely perceptible ; gizzard small, 
moderately muscular, the imner coat slightly hardened, and filled 
with the remains of insects; intestine largest near the gizzard ; I 
could not perceive a vestige of caca. Length of the cesophagus, 
including the proventriculus, 1} inch ; of the intestinal canal 33; 
length of the gizzard 3, breadth 3. 

« Sternum with the keel very deep, its edge rounded and project- 
ing anteriorly ; posterior margin rounded, and destitute of indentation 
or fissure ; the ridges to which the pectoral muscles have their attach- 
ment large and prominent, the horizontal portion much narrowed 
anteriorly, consequently the junctions of the coracoids are very near 
together. ; 

“Pelvis short, very broad; os pubis long, curved upwards at the 
extremities, projecting far downwards, and posteriorly beyond the 
termination of the caudal vertebree ; the ischiatie foramen small and 
linear ; femora placed far backwards; coracoids short, very strong, 


their extremities much diverging ; os furcatum short, slightly arched 


near the extremities of the rami, which are far apart, furnished with 


only a small process on its approach to the sternum ; scapula flat- 


tened, long, broadest near the extremity ; humerus, radius, and ulna 
short, the metacarpal bones longer than either ; the former furnished 
with ridges much elevated for the attachment of the pectoral mus- 
cles ; caudal and dorsal vertebree with the transverse processes long 
and expanded ; cranium of moderate strength, the occipital portion 


- indented with two furrows, which pass over the vertex, and in which 


the hyoids lie ; orbits large, divided by a complete bony septum ; the 
lacrymal bones large, causing an expansion of the bill near the 
nostrils. 

«Number of cervical vertebree 10, dorsal 6, sacral 9, caudal 5; 
total 30. - 

«‘ Number of true ribs 5, false 4; total 9.” _ 

Dr. Davy states that the blood-corpuscles of a recently killed 
Humming-Bird, examined by him in Barbadoes, ‘‘ were beautifully 
definite, regular and uniform. T he disk very thin, perfectly flat ; the 
nucleus slightly raised, and the two corresponding in outline. The 
corpuscles 1-2666th by 1-4000th of an inch, the long diameter of 
the nucleus very nearly 1-4000th. The blood was small in quantity, 
as I apprehend is the blood of birds generally, but not deficient 
in red corpuscles. I have found its temperature to be about 105 
degrees.” 


I have found it impossible to divide the Humming-Birds into 
more than two subfamilies—Phaéthornithine and Trochiline—for 
I find no such well-marked divisions among. them as will enable me 


34 


so to do; neither can I arrange them in anything like a continuous 
series ; so many gaps occur here and there, that one is almost led 
to the belief that many forms have either died out or have not yet 
been discovered ; consequently I am unable to commence with any 
one genus and arrange the remainder in accordance with their 
affinity. Whenever I have observed an apparent relationship be- 
tween two or more genera, they have been placed in contiguity, and 
the species which appear to be allied to each other are arranged in 
continuous succession. I do not consider one species more typical 
than another ; all are equally and beautifully adapted for the purposes 
they are intended to perform. 

The following Synopsis will be found to contain a general view of 
the subject; and as it also comprises the additional information I 
have been able to obtain during the progress of the work, should 
always be consulted. 

I shall now give the general characters by which the Trochilide 
are distinguished :— 

Body small; 
longer than the 


protrusion, and bifid at the tip; nostrils y 
an operculum ; wings lengthened, pointed, the first of which is the 
longest, except in the genus dithurus, where it is the second 3 pri- 
maries ten in number; tarsi and feet very diminutive ; tail con- 
sisting of ten feathers. ‘The entire structure adapted for aérial pro- 
gression. 


Subfamily I. PHAETHORNITHINA. 


I commence my first volume with that well-marked section of the 
family comprising the genera Grypus, Eutoxeres, Phaéthornis, and ° 
their allies. The members of all these genera are remarkable for 
being destitute of metallic brillianey, and, as their trivial name of 
“hermits ” implies, for affecting dark and gloomy situations. They 
constitute, perhaps, the only group of the great family of Humming- 
Birds which frequent the interior of the forests, and there obtain 
their insect food, some from the underside of the leaves of the great 
trees, while others assiduously explore their stems in search of such 
lurking insects as may be concealed in the crevices of the bark. 
It has been said that spiders constitute the food of many species 
of this group; and I believe that such ‘is the case, for we find the 
bills admirably adapted for their capture, particularly those of 
‘Grypus and Eutoxeres. To individualize by name any particular 
country in South America in which these birds are found is un- 
necessary, for they are generally distributed over its temperate and 
hotter portions; but they are not to be met with either very far 
north or very far south of the equator; that is to say, their range 
is bounded northwardly by Southern Mexico, and southwardly by 
Bolivia. Within these limits, the high and the low lands are alike 
tenanted by them ;- but it isin the equatorial region that they are the 


35 


most numerous, and where all, or nearly all, the genera have repre- 
sentatives. In the colouring of their plumage the sexes are generally 


alike. As a whole, they form a well-marked division distinguished [ 


by their own especial peculiarities of form and style of plumage. 


Genus Gryrus, Spiz. 


This form, which comprises two species, both natives of Brazil, 
is remarkable for the bill of the male being different in structure 


from that of the female. 


1. Grypus NEVIUS . Seen a, Bret Pen en Ue Pl. I. 


Trochilus nevius, Dumont, Temm., Vieill., Drap., Burm. 

—— squamosus, Licht. 

Grypus ruficollis, Spix. 

Mellisuga nevia, Steph. 

Ramphodon maculatum, Less. 

— nevius, Less., Jard. 

Grypus nevius, Gray & Mitch., Bonap. 

+ Phathornis nevius, Jard. Nat. Lib. Humming-Birds, vol. ii. p. 152. 

* Ramphodon nevius, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 15; Id. T roch. 
Enum. p. 12; Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 3. 


Habitat. South-eastern Brazil. 


9. Grypus Spixt, Gould - - + + + 2 tt 8 Vol. I. Pl. II. 

* Ramphodon chrysurus, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 15; Id. Troch. 
Enum. p. 12? 
Habitat. Brazil. 


The law of adaptation is perhaps equally carried out in every one 
of the multiplied forms, not only of ornithology, but of every other 
department of nature’s works, each being. constructed for some 
given purpose contributing to the well-being of the animal ; in some 
instances, however, particular developments are more striking and 
singular than in others. The form to which the generic name of Bu- 
toxeres has been given is a case in point. Of this remarkable genus 
two species are known, poth of which are natives of the Andes of 
Ecuador, New Granada, and Veragua. It would be most interesting 
to become acquainted with their peculiar modes of life, and to ascer- 
tain for what end their singularly curved bills were designed. Some 
persons affirm that it is for the purpose of probing the scaly covering 
of the upright stems of certain trees, and others for the exploration 
of peculiar cup-shaped flowers, such as that of the orchid which I 
have figured in the plate of Eutoxeres Aquila. Whatever may be the 
design, future research must determine it; all that we at present know 
is, that this form does exist, and that there is none other which 


approaches to it. In size the two species are very similar, but there 


are good and plain specific characters by which they may be distin- 


- guished, and which will, I trust, be sufficiently apparent on reference 


to the plates in which the birds are represented. 


36 


Genus Evroxeres, Peichenb. 


The oldest-known species of this form is the— 


3. OVO aS GGA AE yoke we Se eo aa, Pi kit. 


Trochilus Aquila, Lodd., Bourc. 
Politmus Aquila, Gray & Mitch. 
Glaucis Aquila, Bonap. 
*EHutoxeres Aquila, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p- 15; Id. Troch, 
Enum. p. 12; Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p- 3, note. 
*Myiaétina aquila, Bonap. Rev. et Mag. de Zool. 1854, p. 249. 


. Habitat. Costa Rica, New Granada, and Ecuador. 


The following notes respecting this species by Dr. J. King Mer- 
ritt will be read with interest. They are extracted from the 6th 
volume of the ‘ Annals of the Lyceum of Natural History of New 
York,’ p. 139:-— 

‘“‘ It was, as near as I can recollect, during the month of Septem- 
ber 1852 that I saw for the first time and obtained a specimen of 
this (to me) curious and novel bird, I was at that time stationed 
in the mountainous district of Belen, province of Veragua, New 
Granada. 

“ My attention at that particular period was directed towards 
the collection of specimens of the Humming-Bird family. One 
day, while out hunting a short distance from the camp, I was startled 
by the swift approach of a small object through the close thicket, 
which darted like a rifle bullet past me, with a loud hum and 
buzzing of wings. Indeed, it was this great noise that accompanied 
its flight that especially attracted my attention as something un- 
common. pad 

“ The bird continued its flight but a short distance beyond the 
spot where I stood, when it suddenly stopped in its rapid course 
directly in front of a flower. There for a moment poising itself in 
this position, it darted upon the flower in a peculiar manner ; in 
fact, the movements which now followed were exceedingly curious, 
_ Instead of inserting its beak into the calyx by advancing in a direct 
line towards the flower, as customary with this class of birds, this 
one performed a curvilinear movement, at first stooping forward 
while it introduced its beak into the calyx, and then, when appa- 
rently the point of the beak had reached the desired locality in the 
flower, its body suddenly dropped downwards, so that it seemed as 
though it was suspended from the flower by the beak. That this 
was not actually the case, the continued rapid movement of its wings 
demonstrated beyond a doubt. In this position it remained the or- 
dinary length of time, and then, by performing these movements in 
the reverse order and direction, it freed itself from the flower, and 
afterwards proceeded to the adjoining one, when the same opera- 
tion was repeated as already described. 

“The flower from which it fed is somewhat peculiar in form, &c. 
The plant belongs to the Palm species, and grows in low marshy 


37 


places, on or near the margins of rivers and mountain streams. It 
consists of a dozen or more straight stems, each of which terminates 
above in a broad expanded leaf that somewhat resembles the plan- 
tain. These stems all start from a clump at the surface of the 
ground, but they immediately separate, aud slightly diverge from. 
each other. The stems with the leaf grow to the height of six to 
ten feet, more or less. From one or two of the centre stems a flower- 
stalk puts forth, which hangs pendent, and to this are attached 
alternately on either side the flowers, while the space between each 
corresponds with the attachment of the one on the opposite side of 
the stalk. 

“ The flower resembles somewhat in form the Roman helmet 
inverted, and is attached, as it were, by the point of the crest to the 
stalk. It is a fleshy mass, and the cavity of the calyx extends in a 
tortuous manner downwards towards the attachment of the flower 
to the stalk.” 


4, EUTOXERES ConDAMINEI er reer a ere IV. 


Trochilus Condamini, Boure. . 
* Buioxeres Condaminei, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 15; Id. Troch. 
Enum. p. 12; Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 3, note. 
* Myiuétina condamini, Bonap. Rev. et —Mag. de Zool. 1854, 
p- 249. 


Habitat. Eastern Ecuador. : 


For the knowledge of the existence of E. Condaminei science 
is indebted to the researches of M. Bourcier, who brought specimens 
from Archidona. 


Genus Giaucis, Boié. 


This genus comprises at least six species, three of which are very 
nearly allied. It will be seen, on reference. to my account of 
G. hirsutus, that when it was written I was much perplexed with 
regard to its synonymy, or rather, as to whether the small red- 
coloured bird, G. mazeppa, was or was not identical with it; and 
although some years have since elapsed, I have not even now been 
able to arrive ata satisfactory solution of the difficulty. Under these 
circumstances, I think it will be best to regard the G. mazeppa as 
distinct; and this view of the subject is supported by the fact that 
‘I do not find small red-coloured birds accompanying the allied 
species, affinis, Lawr., which is a native of Bogota. I think it 
likely that all these birds, when fully adult, have the tail shorter 
‘and more rounded than during the period of immaturity or at the 
end of the first year of their existence. The youthful state then is 
indicated by a more cuneate form of tail, all the feathers of which 
are pointed and tipped with white; and as the birds advance in age 
—that is, at each moult—the tail-feathers become more rounded 
and the white tipping less, until at length it is reduced to a mere 
fringe, existing in some instances on the middle feathers alone. 

The distribution of the species of the genus Glaucis extends over 


38 


the whole of the eastern parts of Brazil, the Guianas, Trinidad, 
Tobago, Venezuela, the banks of the Amazon, New Granada, and 
Veragua. 


Oe SR RGIS TEMS Sek cs ee Vol. I. Pl. V. 
Trochilus hirsutus, Gmel., Vieill., Dumont, T emm., Less., Jard. 
Phethornus hirsutus, Jard. & Selb. 

Polytmus Brasiliensis, Briss. 

Lrochilus Brasiliensis, Lath. 

Polyimus hirsutus, Gray & Mitch. 

Glaucis hirsutus, Boié, Bonap. 
hirsuta, Reich. 

*Trochilus Dominicus, Licht. Doubl. p. 12; Cab. Schomb. Reise 
Guian. tom. iii. p. 708. 

*—____. ferrugineus, Wied, Beitr. iv. p. 20. 

*——__—_ superciliosus, foem., Less. Hist. Nat. des Col. p. 38, 
pl. 7; Id. Traité d’Orn. p. 289; Jard. Nat. Lib. Humming- 
Birds, vol. ii. p- 120, pl. 27; Burm. Th. Bras. tom. li. p. 324. 

* hirsuta, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil ili. p. 4. 


Habitat. Eastern Brazil, Venezuela, and the Island of Trinidad. 


6. Graucis Mazerppa . .., Serre 6) be Oe 


*Gilaucis Mazeppa, Less. Troch. p. 18, pl.3; Jard. Nat. Lib. 
Humming-Birds, vol. ii. p. 130. 
*Phaéthornis Mazeppa, Jard. Nat. Lib. Humming-Birds, vol. ii. 
. 162. . 
*Poiiiinus mazeppa, Gray & Mitch. Gen. of Birds, vol. ii. p- 108 
Polytmus, sp. 32. 
*Glaucis Mazeppa, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p- 15. 


Habitat. Cayenne, the Guianas, and the Islands of Trinidad and 
Tobago. 


“ This little bird,” says Mr. Kirk, “is the most restless of all the 
Humming-Bird tribe ; it can scarcely be said to be seen at rest, but 
darting right and left, zigzag. At times, when suddenly surprised 
feeding, uttering a sharp squeak it will dart off and disappear like a 
meteor ; at other times it will seem as if suspended for several seconds 
by the point of the bill within three feet of a person’s face, after 
which it is sure to disappear like lightning; in these cases it trul 
assumes an attitude which a stranger might construe into a medi. 
tated attack upon his person. I have often been induced to strike 
at them with my fowling-piece from their proximity.”—* Hore 
Loologice,’ by Sir W. Jardine, Bart., in Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist. 
Vol XS. D. 372. 


? 


7. GLAUCIS AEPINIS, Laon, 2° Ee os eee VIL. 
* Glaucis affinis, Lawr.in Ann. Lyc. Nat. Hist. New York, vol. vi, 
p- 261. 
Habitat. The high lands of New Granada. Specimens are fre- 
quently sent from Bogota. 


39 


8° Giabers wancmonatus, Gould dex! 0 0 MoldidPl WIN. 


Habitat. Para. 


9. GLAucIs mELANURA, Gold... . . + Vole I PLEX. 
Habitat. The banks of the Rio Napo and the Rio Negro. 


i Camtee one . Se ee ee, VOL LT 


Trochilus Dohrnii, Boure. 
Glaucis Dorhni, Bonap., Reich. 
* Glaucis Dohrni, Cab: et Hein. Mus. Hein. ‘Theil iii. p. 4. 


Habitat. Southern Brazil. 


M. Bourcier has given Ecuador as the locality where his speci- 
men was procured; but my bird was received direct from the dis- 
trict of Espirito Santo in Brazil. 


Miadahaois MuCKERT . seu 6 a te Shien: VOR a. ke 


Trochilus Ruckert, Bourc. 
Polytmus Ruckeri, Gray & Mitch. 
* Threnetes Ruckeri, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 15; Id. Troch. 
Enum. p. 12. 
* Glaucis Ruckeri, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 4. 


Habitat. Veragua. 


19. Guaucis Fraser, Gould . . . . « - Vol. 1 Pll XII. 
* Glaucis Ruckeri, Sclat. in Proc. of Zool. Soc. part 28. p. 296. 


Mr. Fraser collected at Babahoyo, in Ecuador, specimens of a bird 
which both Dr. Sclater and myself considered to be identical with 
the Glaucis Ruckeri, but which, on a more minute comparison with 
specimens from Veragua, I find to be sufficiently different to entitle 
it to be regarded as distinct ; I have therefore named it after its 
discoverer, as a just tribute to one who has played a good part in 
the furtherance of science. The G. Fraseri differs from G. Ruckert 
in being rather larger in size, in having a smaller amount of rusty 
red on the chest, and in having a decidedly grey breast; in other 
respects the two birds are very similar. 

The following is Mr. Fraser’s note respecting this species :— 

“ Found on the edge of the virgin forest; always solitary; gene- 
rally in dark and lonely places, and very restless. Irides hazel ; 
upper mandible black, lower yellow, with a black tip; legs and feet 
flesh-colour.” . 


Habitat. Ecuador. 


Allied to the last form are the members of the genus Threnetes ; 
these birds are not distinguished by any brilliancy of colouring, 
but two of them are very prettily marked about the throat and 
chest. 


Surinam and the adjacent countries are given as the habitat of 


40 


T. leucurus, while the banks of the Rio Napo are known to be the 
home of the bird I have called cervinicauda; and the sombre- 
plumaged Antonie is a native of Cayenne and the Guianas. I 
believe that the females of all three species are clothed like the 
males. 


Genus THRENETES, Gould. 


(Opnvnrijs, a mourner.) 


Generic characters. 

Male.— Bill lengthened, arched, and pointed ; wings moderately 
long, and rounded at the tip; ¢az/ short, square, or rounded; ¢arsi 
partially clothed; feet very small; hind toe and nail short. 


EOL ER BNET ie GEUOURUS:-<. 4, sas, . 2) Vb bok wee 
Trochilus leucurus, Linn., Gmel., Lath., Less., Vieill., Dumont, 
Drap. ; 
Polytmus Surinamensis, Briss. 
- leucurus, Gray & Mitch. 
Gilaucis leucurus, Bonap. 
* Threnetes leucurus, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p.15; Id. Troch. 
Enum. p. 12. 


Habitat. Surinam and British Guiana. 


14. THRENETES CERVINICAUDA, Gould . . . Vol. I. Pl. XIV. 


* Threnetes cervinicauda, Gould in Proc. of Zool. Soc. part 22. 
Damo oe 


Habitat. Province of Quijos in Ecuador. 


15. THRENETES ANTONIE ee Po be, Oe ae eee ee 


Trochilus Antonie, Bourc. et Muls. 
Polytmus Antonie, Gray & Mitch. 
Lampornis Antonie, Bonap. 
* Aphantochroa Antoniae, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p.- 15; Id. Troch. 
Enum. p. 12. 


Habitat. Cayenne and the Guianas. 


I now enter upon the genus Phaéthornis, the members of which 
are so widely dispersed, that the remark I made on the extended 
distribution of the entire group is almost applicable to this section of 
it. In the body of this work I have figured nearly thirty species 
under this generic appellation, including therein the smaller kinds 
to which Bonaparte gave the name of Pygmornis, a term I shall 
now adopt for these little birds: but a further subdivision of the 
group I cannot for a moment entertain; the separation of the P. Bour- 
cieré into a distinct genus, for which the term Ametrornis has been 
proposed by Dr. Reichenbach, and of the P. Guyi under that of Toxo- 
teuches by Dr. Cabanis, being, in my opinion, quite unnecessary, 


Ad 


Genus PHakrHornis, Swains. 


16. PHA#THORNIS EURYNOME - - + + + ° Vol. I. Pi. XVE. 
Trochilus Eurynome, Less. . 
Eurynomus, Jard. } 
Phetornis eurynomus, Gray & Mitch., Bonap. 

* Phethornis Eurynomus, Jard. Nat. Lib. Humming-Birds, vol. ii. 
p- 150. 

* Phaétornis eurynome, Bonap. Consp. Gen. Av. tom. i. p. 67, Phaé- 

. tornis, sp. 5. 

* Trochilus melanotis, “ Licht.” Nordm. Erm. Reis. Atl. p. 2. 

* Phetornis melanotis, Gray & Mitch. Gen. of Birds, vol. i. p. 104, 
Phetornis, sp. 3; Bonap. Consp. Gen. Av. tom. i. p. 67, Phe- 
tornis, sp. 3. 

* Ptyonornis Hurynome, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 14; Id. Troch. 
Enum. p. 12. . 

* Phaéthornis eurynome, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 9. 

Habitat. Brazil. 


17. PHAETHORNIS MALARIS. — 
Phaéthornis superciliosus . - + + ss * Vol. I. Pl. XVII. 


* Phaéthornis malaris, Gray & Mitch. Gen. of Birds, vol. i. p. 10), 
sp.2; Bonap. Consp. Gen. Av. tom. i. p. 67, sp. 2; Cab. et Hein. 
Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 9. 

* Colibri a longue queue de Cayenne, Buff. Pl. Enl. 600, 3. 

* Brin blane mdle, Vieill. Ois. Dor. tom. i. p. 37, pl.17.. 

* Trochilus superciliosus, Id. Enc. Méth. Orn. part 2. p. 549, sp. oe 
Less. Hist. Nat. des Col. p. 35, pl. 6 ; Id. Traité d’Orn. p. 288 ; 

Jard. Nat. Lib. Humming-Birds, vol. ii. p. 119, pl. 26; Cab. 

Schomb. Reise Guian. iii. p. 708 ; Burm. Th. Bras. ii. p. 323. 

malaris, “ Licht.” Nordm. Erm, Reis. Atl. p. 2, 15. 

* Phaéthornis superciliosus, Swains. Class. of Birds, vol. il. p. 330; 
Jard. Nat. Lib. Humming-Birds, vol. ii. p. 1505 Gray & Mitch. 
Gen. of Birds, vol. i. p. 104, Phetornis, sp. 1; Bonap. Consp. 
Gen. Av. tom. i. p. 67, Phetornis, sp. 1 ; Pelzeln, Sitz. Acad. 
Wien. 1856, p. 157, 1. , 


Habitat. Cayenne, the Guianas, and Northern Brazil ? 


* 


It will be seen that the above list of synonyms differs from 
those given with my account of this species. I adopt them on 
the authority of Dr. Cabanis, who considers that I am in error in 
applying the term superciliosus to the bird I have figured under 
that name, and that it properly belongs to the one I have called 
Pretrei,—an opinion which is probably correct, as the German natu- 
valists are doubtless better acquainted with the type specimens of 
continental writers than we can be: the synonyms of malaris and 
superciliosus are therefore given as stated by Dr. Cabanis. 


4-2 


18. PHAETHORNIS CONSOBRINUS. 


* Trochilus consobrinus, “ Boure.” Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. ee 
*Phethornis Moorei, Lawr. in Ann. Lye. Nat. Hist. New York, 
vol. vi. p. 259. 
Habitat. New Granada, Ecuador, and the banks of the Napo.. 


This is the bird so commonly sent from Bogota, and which so 
closely assimilates both to the malaris (superciliosus of my work) 
and longirostris (cephalus). It ranges over the north-western parts 
of Venezuela and New Granada. I have also a specimen from 
Archidona in Ecuador. A great number of specimens from all 
these countries are now before me, and among them two named 
consobrinus by M. Bourcier himself, and one from Mr. Lawrence 
of New York, labelled P. Moorei, proving that. these two names 
have been applied to the same bird. 


19. PHAETHORNIS FRATERCULUS, Gould . . Vol. I. Pl. XVIII. 
Habitat. Cayenne and the neighbouring countries. 


Every ornithologist who has paid attention to the Zrochilide 
must have seen a Humming-Bird from Cayenne and the adjacent 
countries which is very similar to, but smaller than, the malaris (su- 
perciliosus of this monograph); yet, strange to say, I find no de- 
scription that, will accord. with it. I have therefore given it the 
pl Me specific appellation. It is possible that it may be the female 
of 


he malaris (superciliosus). 


20. PHAHTHORNIS LONGIROSTRIS . . . . ~ Vol. I. Pl. XIX. 
Trochilus longirostris, De Latt. 
————. cephalus, Boure. et Muls., Gray & Mitch. 
Phetornis cephalus, Bonap. 
Ptyonornis cephalus, Reichenb. 
* Phaéthornis longirostris, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 9. 


Habitat. Central America. 


21. PHAETHORNIS SYRMATOPHORUS, Gould . . Vol. I. Pl. XX. 
Habitat. Ecuador. 


“ Trides hazel; upper mandible black; lower mandible red, tipped 
with black; legs and feet dark flesh-éolour. Stomach contained 
yellow insects. Allinsects previously examined amongst the Hum- 
ming-Birds have been black.” —Fraser in Proc. of Zool. Soc. part 27, 
p. 145. 


22. PHatruornis Boxiviana, Gould. 


Upper mandible black; under mandible yellow, with a dark tip; 
above and beneath the eye a stripe of buff; chin smoky brown; 
throat, chest, belly, and under tail-coverts dull reddish-fawn colour ; 
crown dark brown, each feather faintly striated with buff; all the 
upper surface dull reddish fawn-colour, crescented with small marks 


| 
= ee \ 


43 


of brown; base of the four outer tail-feathers on each side bronzy 
green, to which suceeeds a bar of black, beyond which the tip is 
reddish buff; the two prolonged centre feathers bronze at the base, 
then brownish black, and white for the remainder of their length. 
Total length 53 inches, bill 12, wing 2}, tail 23. 
Habitat. Bolivia. 


This bird is somewhat allied to P. syrmatophorus; but it is of much 
smaller size and has the throat and chest differently coloured, those 
parts being obscure smoky grey without the conspicuous streakings 
of buff; the whole under-surface also, as well as the rump, is less 
richly coloured. 


93, PHAETHORNIS PHILIPPI PT icp AW Olea tale XXI. 


Trochilus Philippii, Boure. 
De Filippit, Boure. 
Phatornis Philippi, Gray & Mitch. 
Phaétornis philippi, Bonap. 
- Orthornis defilippi, Bonap. 
Ametrornis De Filippi, Reichenb. 
* Ametrornis Defilippii, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 10, note. 


Habitat. Peru or Bolivia. 


94, PHAETHORNIS HISPIDUS, Gould a ena PR aT. 
Trochilus ( ?) hispidus, Gould. 
Phetornis hispidus, Gray & Mitch. 
Phaétornis hispidus,. Bonap. 
* Ptyonornis hispida, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 14; Id. Troch. 
Enum. p. 12. 


Habitat. Bolivia. 


95, PHABTHORNIS OSERYI- - + + + + + Vol. I. Pl. XXIII. 
Trochilus Oseryi, Boure. et Muls. 
| Ametrornis Osery?, Reichenb. 
Orthornis osery?, Bonap. 
Phethornis villosus, Lawr. 


Habitat. New Granada and Ecuador. 


26. PHAHTHORNIS ANTHOPHILUS + «© + - Vol. I. Pl. XXIV. 


Trochilus Anthophilus, Boure. 
Phetornis anthophilus, Gray & Mitch., Bonap. 
Phaétornis anthophilus, Bonap. 
7 * Phaethornis anthophila, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 9. 


Habitat. New Granada. 
27. PHAETHORNIS Bountrent..-.° «.- -. Vol. ET. PL XAXY. 


Trochilus Bourcieri, Less. 
Phetornis Bourciert, Gray & Mitch. 


— - a — SSS SS ee = 


a 


44 


Phaétornis bourcieri, Bonap. 
* Trochilus Bourcieri, Jard. Nat. Lib. Humming-Birds, vol. ii. 
p- 124. 
* Phethornis Bourcieri, Id. p- 150. 
* Orthornis Bourcieri, Bonap. Rev. et Mag. de Zool. 1854, p. 249. 
* Ametrornis Bourciert, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 14; Id. Troch. 
Enum. p.12; Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 10. 


Habitat. Cayenne and the adjacent countries. 


Oe PaAareronwis GuYt 2.62% Yo 4 t40dis “Vekd? PRE wie 


Trochilus Guy, Less., Jard. 
Ornismya G'uy, Delatt. Echo du Monde Savant, no. 45, Juin 15, 
1843, col. 1069. : 
Phetornis Guy, Gray & Mitch. 
Phaétornis Guy, Bonap. 
Trochilus apicalis, Licht., Tsch. 
-Phetornis apicalis, Gray & Mitch. 
Phaétornis apicalis, Bonap. . 
*Phethornis Guy, Jard. Nat. Lib. Humming-Birds, vol. ii. p. 150; 
Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p.14; Id. Troch. Enum. p. 12. 
* Guyornis typus, Bonap. Rev. et Mag. de Zool. 1854, p. 249. 
* Toxoteuches Guyi, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 11. 


Habitat. Trinidad. 


29. PHAHTHORNIS EMILI&. 
Trochilus Emilie, Boure. 

*Phetornis Emilia, Gray & Mitch. Gen. of Birds, vol. i. p. 104, 
Phetornis, sp.’7; Bonap. Consp. Gen. Av. vol. i. p. 68, Phaé- 
tornis, sp. 7. 

Habitat. New Granada. 


On reference to my account of P. Guyi, it will be seen that I 
questioned whether the Trochilus Emilie of M. Bourcier was not 
identical with that species; but having since seen a great number 
of examples of the latter from Bogota, and of the former from 
Trinidad, I find that each possesses certain characters by which 
an experienced ornithologist would be able at once to say whence 
specimens of either had been received. The Andean bird, when 
fully adult, is rather larger in size, is much darker in general ap- 
pearance, has the chin stripes less conspicuous, the apical two- 
thirds of the tail-feathers blacker, and their basal third and the 
upper tail-coverts bluish green instead of pure green. The differ- 
ences in the two birds are, in fact, precisely analogous to those which 
occur between the Glaucis hirsutus and G. affinis. 


307 PHAMrHoRNIs Yarvour. . «= <'o:( Wohi’ Ph AW, 


Trochilus Yaruqui, Boure. 
*Phaéthornis Yarugui, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p..14; Id. Troeh. 
Enum. p. 12. 
*Guyornis Yaruqui, Bonap. Rev. et Mag. de Zool. 1854, p. 24.9. 


45 


* Toxoteuches Yaruqui, Cab.et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p.11, note. 
Habitat. Ecuador. . 


“Upper mandible black; lower deep red with a black tip; legs 
and feet reddish.”—Frraser, Proc. of Zool. Soc. part 28, p» G4. — 


As the last three species advance in age their tails become shorter, 
their feathers broader, and the white fringing of the lateral ones 
almost obsolete. 


| 31. PHAETHORNIS SUPERCILIOSUS. . 
| Mico Presta 6 Pee ORR XXVIII. | 


* Polytmus Cayanensis longicaudus, Briss. Orn. tom. iii. p. 686, 13, 
tab. 35. fig. 5. . 

* Trochilus superciliosus, Linn. Syst. Nat. tom. i. p. 139; Lath. Ind. 
Orn.tom. i.p.302; Wied, Beitr. tom.iv.p.116 ; “ Licht.” Nordm. 
Erm. Reis. Atl. p. 2,16. 

*________ Pretrei, Delatt. et Less. Rev. Zool. 1839, p. 20. 

*.____ brasiliensis, Cab. in Schomb. Reis. Guian. tom. ili. 

: elas FOG: 

* Phetornis Pretrei, Gray, Gen. of Birds, vol. i. p. 104, Phetornis, 

sp. 16, pl. 35; Bonap. Consp. Gen. Av. tom. i. p. 68, Phetornis, 
‘-—gpel5: 

* Trochilus affinis, Natt. in Mus. Vindob. 

* Phathornis affinis, Pelzeln, Sitz. Acad. Wien, 1857, p. 157. 

- superciliosus, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 9. 


Habitat. Eastern Brazil. 


As in the case of P. malaris, the above list of synonyms is given 
on the authority of Dr. Cabanis. 


32. PuaiirHornts AUGUSTI . : eae TEMES | 0s Oe rel © <e. 


Trochilus Augusti, Boure. 
Phetornis Augusta, Gray & Mitch. 
augustt, Bonap. 
Phaétornis augustae, Bonap. 
*Phaéthornis Augusti, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 14; Id. Troch. 
Enum. p.12. . . 


Habitat. Venezuela. {' 


33. PHAETHORNIS SQUALIDUS. 
Phaéthornis intermedius - - * + = * Vol. I. Pl. XXX. 
* Trochilus squalidus, “ Natt.” Temm. Pl. Col. 120. fig. 1; Less. 


Man. d’Orn. p. 289; Id. Hist. Nat. des Col. p. 40, pl.8; Id. 
Traité d’Orn. p. 289; Jard. Nat. Lib. Humming-Birds, vol. ii. 


p- 125. 


intermedius, Less. Troch. p. 65, pl. 19; Jard. Nat. Lib. 


Humming-Birds, vol. ii. p. 123. 
leucophrys, “ Licht.” Nordm, Erm. Reis. Atl. p. 2, 18. 


E 


siege ee ee a 


46 


*Phethornis squalidus, Jard. Nat. Lib. Humming-Birds, vol. ii. 
p-151; Bonap. Consp. Gen. Av. tom. i. p. 68, sp.11; Burm. 
Th. Bras. tom. ii. p. 325. 

, intermedius, Jard. Nat. Lib. Humming-Birds, vol. ii. 
p. 150; Gray & Mitch. Gen. of Birds, vol. i. p. 104, sp. 8; 

_ Bonap. Consp. Gen. Av. tom. i. p. 67, Phaetornis, sp. 8. 

* ____—__ leucophrys, Gray & Mitch. Gen. of Birds, vol. i. p. 104, 
sp. 4. 

* brasiliensis, Gray & Mitch. Gen. of Birds, vol. i. p. 104, 
sp. 10. 

* Ptyonornis intermedia, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 14 ; Id. Troch. 
Enum. p. 12. 

* Phaéthornis squalida, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 8. 

Habitat. South-eastern Brazil. 


We now come to that section to which Bonaparte gave the name 
of Pygmornis. As the term implies, these birds are all extremely 
diminutive; so minute, indeed, are they, that, if subjected to the 
balance, their tiny bodies must be weighed by grains. That these 
mites of birds perform some important office in the scale of nature 
is certain, from the number both of species and individuals: they 
are very widely dispersed over every part of the great country which 
is inhabited by this extensive family of birds; with the exception of 
one species, however (the P. Adolphi), they all fly to the southward 
of the Isthmus of Panama. How minute must be the insects taken 


by these diminutive birds, how perfect must be their vision, and how 
~ » delicately sensitive must be their tongues! 

The only external difference between the sexes consists in the 
' longer and more graduated tails of the females; in colour they are 
as nearly alike as possible. 


34. PyGmMoRNIs LONGUEMAREUS. 
- Phaéthornis Longuemareus- - . . . ~ Vol. I. Pl. XXXI. 
Trochilus Longuemareus, Less. 
Phetornis Longuemareus, Gray & Mitch. 
Phaétornis Longuemareus, Bonap. 
Phaéthornis Longuemari, Reich. 
‘* Trochilus Longuemareus, Jard. Nat. Lib. Humming-Birds, vol. ii. 
p. 126; Cab. in Schomb. Reis. Guian. tom. iii. p. 709. 
* Phethornis Longuemareus, Jard. Nat. Lib. vol. ii. p. 151. 
* Pygmornis Longuemarei, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 7, 
note. 
Habitat. Cayenne, Guiana, Trinidad, and the eastern part of 
~ ‘Venezuela. idee 
35. PyGMoRNis AMAURA. 
Phaéthornis Amaura . . - + + + + Vol. I. Pl. XXXII. 
Pygmornis Amaura, Boure. 
. Phethornis atrimentalis, Lawr. 
* Pygmornis amaura, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 7, note. 
Habitat. Banks of the River Napo. 


47 


36. PyGMorNis ASPASI®. eae Reo 
. Phaéthornis viridicaudata, Gould . . ~ Vol. I. Pl. XXXII. 


*Trochilus Aspasie, Boure. et Muls. Ann. de la Soe. Linn. de. 
Lyon, tom. iii. 1856. 

* Phaéthornis viridicaudata, Gould, Proc. of Zool. Soc. 1857, p. 14. 

* Trochilus (Polytmus) pygmaeus, Tschudi, Consp. p. 36; Id. Faun. 
Per. p. 243. . 

* Pygmornis viridicaudata, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 7; 
note. 


Habitat. Brazil and Peru. 


37. PyamMornis zoNuRA, Gould. 
Phaéthornis zonura, Gould . . . . . Vol. I. Pl. XXXIV. 
Habitat. Peru. 


38. Pycmornis AvoLPHI. 
Phaéthornis Adolphi, Boure.. . . . . Vol. I. Pl. XXXV. 


' Phaéthornis Adolphi, Bourc. 
' Pygmornis Adolphi, Parzudaki. . 
* Pygmornis Adolphi, “ Sallé, MSS.” Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. 
Theil iii. p. 7, note. =e 
Habitat. Central America. 


“This,” says Mr. Salvin, “is an abundant species in the forest 
about Yzabal, but the density of the under growth renders it ex- 
tremely difficult to obtain a shot at so small and active an object. 
The bird is by no means shy, and takes but little notice of an ob- 
server—even searching the flowers almost within arm’s reach, for the 
insects and honey therein contained. In movement it is extremely 
elegant and graceful, and, flitting from flower to flower, shows its 
beautifully. formed tail conspicuously in every motion. Like all 
others of its family, it selects a small twig for its perch, giving pre- 
ference to a dead one. While at rest it trims its feathers dexter- 
ously with its bill, which every now and then it cleans by rubbing 
it first on one side and then on the other of the twig on which it 
stands.”—‘ Ibis,’ vol. i. p. 127. 


39. PyGMoRNIS GRISEOGULARIS, Gould. 

- Phaéthornis griseogularis, Gowld . . . Vol. I. Pl. XXXVI. 
“* Pygmornis griseigularis, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theiliii. p. 8. 
_ Habitat. New Granada; and Ecuador? 


In my description of this species I have inadvertently stated that 
it has a crescent of black across the breast, which is not the case. 
_ Mr. Bell of New York informs me that he has heard the “ little 
Pygmornis of Panama,” by which I believe the present bird is 
intended, “sing beautifully, the notes forming a soft, shrill, and 
pretty song.” 
EQ 


48 


40. PyGMorNIS STRIIGULARIS, Gould. 
Phaéthornis-striigularis, Gould . . + Vol. I. Pl. XX XVII. 
* Pygmornis striigularis, Cab.et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p.'7, note. 
Habitat. New Granada. 


41. Pygmornis IDALIZ. 
Phaéthornis obscura, Gowld . . . . Vol. I. Pl. XXXVIII. 
* Trochilus Idalia, Bourc. et Muls. Ann. de la Soc. Linn. de Lyon, 
tom. iii. 1856. 
* Phethornis obscura, Gould, Proc. of Zool. Soc. 1857, p. 14. 
* Pygmornis obscura, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 7, note. 
Habitat. Brazil. 


42. Pyemornis NIGRICINCTUS. 
Phaéthornis nigricinctus, Lawr. . Vol. I. Pl. XXXIX. fig. 1. 


Phaéthornis nigricinctus, Lawr. 
* Pygmornis nigricincta, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 7, note. 


Habitat. The forests bordering the upper part of the River 
Amazon. 


43. Pyemornis Eriscopus, Gould. 
Phaéthornis Episcopus, Gould . . Vol. I. Pl. XXXIX. fig. 2. 


Phaéthornis Episcopus, Gould. 
* Pygmornis episcopus, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 7, note. 


Habitat. British Guiana. 


44. PYGMORNIS RUFIVENTRIS. 


* Brin blane jeune dge, Vieill. Ois. Dor. tom. i. p. 39, pl. 19. 

* Trochilus rufigaster, Vieill. Nouv. Dict. d’Hist. Nat. tom. vii. 
p- 357; Id. Enc. Méth. Orn. part ii. p. 551. 

*—____. Davidianus, Less. Troch. p. 50, pl. 13; Jard. Nat. Lib. 
Humming-Birds, vol. ii. p. 127. 

* Phethornis Davidianus, Jard. Nat. Lib. Humming-Birds, vol. ii. 
p- 151; Gray & Mitch. Gen. of Birds, vol. i, p- 108, sp. 13. 

“a — rufigaster, Gray & Mitch. Gen. of Birds, vol. i. p. 108, 
sp. 12. ; 

Pas A pygmaeus, Cab. in Schomb. Reis. Guian. tom. iii. p.’708. 

* Bremita Davidianus, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 14; Id. Troch. 
Enum. p. 11. 

*Pygmornis Davidianus, Bonap. Rev. et Mag. de Zool. 1854, p. 250. 

24 — rufiventris, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 7, note. 


Habitat. Cayenne. 


_ The above list of synonyms are given on the authority of Dr. 
Cabanis : it is just possible that they may refer to the female of my 
P. Episcopus; but I fear that this cannot at present be satisfactorily 
determined. 


—————— 


= 


49 


45. Pyamornis Eremita, Gould. 


Phaéthornis Eremita, Gould » .°. + + +. Vol. tT. PL XL. 


Trochilus Brasiliensis, Temm. 
———— rujfigaster, Less. 
Phetornis rufigaster, Gray & Mitch. 
Phaéthornis Eremita, Gould. 
*Trochilus Brasiliensis, Less. Man. d’Orn, tom. ii. p. 75; Id. 
Traité d’Orn. p. 289... - . 
*____ mfigaster, Jard. Nat. Lib. Humming-Birds, vol. ii. 
p- 83, pl. 4.» 
* Phethornis rufigaster, Jard. Nat. Lib, Humming-Birds, vol. ii. 
p. 151; Burm. Th. Bras, tom. ii. p. 326. 
* Phatornis, sp., Gray & Mitch. Gen. of Birds, vol. iii. App. p. 30a. 
* Phaétornis eremita, Bonap. Consp. Gen. Av. tom. i. p. 68, Phae- 
tornis, sp. 12. 
* Hremita rufigaster, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 14; Id. Troch. 
LO ire Ue? & | Sanh eee 
* Pygmornis rufigaster, Bonap. Rev. et Mag. de Zool. 1854, p. 250. 
_ eremita, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 7. 


Habitat. Northern Brazil, Bahia, the banks of the Lower Amazon. 


46. PYGMORNIS PYGMEA. 
-Phaéthornis pygmeus - - + + + + + > Vol. I. Pl. X%LI. 


Trochilus pygmaeus, Spix. 
Phaétornis pygmeus, Bonap. 
*Trochilus Brasiliensis, Wied, Beitr. tom. iv. p. P11. 
.: pygmaeus, Burm. Th. Bras. tom. ii. p. 327. 
*Bremita pygmaeus, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 14; Id. Troeh. 
Enum. p. 10. 
* Pygmornis pygmaea, Cab. et Hein, Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 6. 


Habitat. South-eastern Brazil. 


Subfamily Il. TROCHILIN/. 


I commence the second volume with the Campylopteri, a group 
of Humming-Birds distinguished by their great size, by the diver- 
sity of their colouring, and by the broad dilated shafts of the first 
three primaries or quill-feathers of the males. The members of this 
group are spread over nearly the whole of the temperate regions of 
America, from Mexico to the equator, including Brazil, Guiana, 
Venezuela, and some of the West Indian Islands. 

This section of the Trochilide comprises several very distinct 
forms :-—one remarkable for a deeply forked tail, for the rich blue 
colouring of the body, and for the similarity in the outward appear- 
ance of the sexes; another for having the tail cuneate ; while a 
third, comprising six or seven species, 18 distinguished by a very 
ample and rounded tail. It is for the last form alone that I have 
retained the generic appellation of Campylopterus, applying that of 


eet sett 
— — 


50 


Eupetomena to the deeply forked-tailed bird macroura, Spheno- 
proctus to the .cuneate-tailed Pampa, and Pheochroa to the Cu- 
viert and the allied Roberti, which may be considered as aberrant, 
the broad shafts of the primaries (the principal characteristic of the 
_ group) being but slightly developed. These birds lead on to Aphan- 
tochroa. 

Genus EupETOMENA, Gould. 


(Ev, bené, et rerovévn, volans.) 


Generic characters. . 

Male.— Bill longer than the head, and slightly arched; wings 
moderate; shafts of the first two or three primaries bowed, dilated 
and flattened ; tail long and deeply forked ; éarsi partially clothed ; 
Jeet rather small; hind toe shorter than the middle toe. 

Female.—Similar to the male in plumage. 


47. EUPETOMENA MACROURA, 
Eupetomena hirundinacea . . . . - Vol. I. Pl. XLII. 


Trochilus macrourus, Gmel., Licht. 
——-~ forcipatus, Lath. 
Mellisuga Cayanensis caudd bifured, Ray, Willughb., Briss. 
Ornismya hirundinacea, Less. 
Polytmus macrourus, Gray & Mitch. 
* Prognornis macroura, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col., p.11; Id. Troch. 
Enum. p. 9, pl. 805. figs. 4873-75. 
* Hupetomena macroura, Bonap. Rev. et Mag. de Zool. 1854, p. 254. 
* Cynanthus macrourus, Jard. Nat. Lib. Humming-Birds, vol. ii. 
. 149. 
+ aehetomeite macrura, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 14. 
*Ornismya hirundinacea, Dev. Rev. et Mag. de Zool. 1852, p. 214. 


Habitat. Brazil, Cayenne, and the neighbouring countries. 


M. Deville states that “this Humming-Bird sometimes accom- 
panies the Chrysolampis moschitus into the fields, but generally 
prefers the neighbourhood of the river-banks, where the silky tufts 
of the Inge and the blossoms of the numerous Lianes suffice for 
its wants. It flies very rapidly, has a shrill ery, and is so fearless 
that it will settle within a few feet of the object which has alarmed 
it. It is found throughout the whole of Brazil all the year round, 
but appears to be most numerous in August, September, and 
October.” 


Genus SpHrenorroctus, Cab. 


Of this form there are evidently two species—one inhabiting 
Mexico, and the other Guatemala. It bas always been considered 
by Trochilidists that the 15th Plate of the Supplement to ‘ Lesson’s 
Histoire Naturelle des Oiseaux-mouches’ represents one or other 
of them, but that he was in error in giving the interior of La Plata 
as its habitat. I have not been able to see Lesson’s type; otherwise 
I could have ascertained to which of the two it has reference, or 
whether it is different from both. My figures were taken from 


\e 


~~ 


51 ms 
4 
Guatemalan specimens, and Lesson’s plate would appear to have 
been taken from an example procured in the same country; con- 
sequently the term Pampa must be retained for the Guatemalan 
bird, while for the larger and stouter Mexican birds we must use 
Lichtenstein’s name curvipennis. 


48. SpuHenoproctus Pampa. 
Campylopterus Pampa, Less. - - + - - Vol. I. Pl. XLII. 


-Ornismya Pampa, Less. 
Polytmus pampa, Gray & Mitch. 
Campylopterus pampa, Less., Bonap., Jard. 
Pampa campyloptera, Reichenb. 
-*Campylopterus pampa, Sclat. & Salv. Ibis, vol. i. p.127; Salv. 
Ibis, vol. ii. p. 260. 
Habitat. Guatemala. 


49. SPHENOPROCTUS CURVIPENNIS. 
* Trochilus curvipennis, Licht. Preis-Verz. Mex. Thier. v. Deppe & 
Schiede (Sept. 1830), no. 32. 
* Sphenoproctus pampa, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 11. 
* Campylopterus pampa, Montes de Oca in Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. 
Philad. 1860, p. 551. . 


Habitat. Mexico. 


This species differs from the preceding in its much larger size, 
and in the paler tint of its blue crown. 

“The people of Coantepec, nine miles from Jalapa,” says M. 
Montes de Oca, “give to this species the name of Chupa-mirto fan- 
danguero, or Fandango Myrtle-sucker, apparently because it has a 
somewhat musical voice. It is the only Humming-Bird with which 
I am acquainted whose notes are sufficient to recognise it by in the 
woods: though rather monotonous, they are very pleasing. It is 
occasionally found in the neighbourhood of Jalapa, but it is more 
abundant at Coantepec. It inhabits the forest in the winter season, 
and generally feeds on the flowers of the high bushes called Asa- 
saretos, which are then in full bloom, and densely covered with 
smooth emerald-green leaves, amongst which it is very difficult to 
be detected. Very few are to be seen in summer time.” 


Genus CampyLorrerus, Swains. 


50. CAMPYLOPTERUS LAZULUS + * * = = Vol. II. Pl. XLIV. 


Trochilus lazulus, Vieill. 
falcatus, Swains., Less. 
Mellisuga lazulus, Gray & Mitch. 
Campylopterus lazulus, Bonap- 
Teniopterns lazulus, Reichenb. 
-* Ornismya falcata, Less. Hist. Nat. des Ois. Mou. pp. xliv. 126. 
+» pl. 36. 
* Campylopterus lazulus, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 13. 


52 


Habitat. Venezuela, the hilly parts of New Granada generally, 
and Ecuador, from which latter country I have received spe- 
cimens through Professor Jameson, collected near Barza. 


51. CAMPYLOPTERUS HEMILEUCURUS. 
Campylopterus Delattrei . . . . » - + Vol. II. Pl, XLV. 


Ornismya (Campylopterus) De Lattre, Less. 

Mellisuga De Lattrei, Gray & Mitch. 

Campylopterus delattre, Bonap. 

delattrii, Bonap. 

Delattrei, Reichenb. 

* Trochilus hemileucurus, Licht. Preis-Verz. Mex. Thier. v. Deppe 
& Schiede (Sept. 1830), no. 33. 

*Campylopterus hemileucurus, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. 

- 13. 

* De Lattrei, Montes de Oca in Proc. Acad. Nat. 

Sci. Philad. 1860, p. 47. 


Habitat. Mexico and Guatemala. 


“ The large and showy tail of this Humming-Bird,” says Mr. Salvin, 
“makes it one of the most conspicuous when on the wing. It is 
common at Coban, feeding among the Salvi; it is said also to be 
found in the Volean de Fuego, but I have not met with it. The 
females of this species are most abundant, their ratio to the males 
being as five to two. It is not nearly so shy as its congener, C. rufus.” 
—Tbis, vol. ii. p. 260. 

“ This beautiful Humming Bird,” says M. Montes de Oca, “ is 
generally known in Mexico by the name of Chupa-mirto real 
azul, or Royal Blue Myrtle-sucker. It arrives in the vicinity of 
Jalapa, Coantepec, and Orizaba in considerable numbers during the 
months of October and November, and is mostly found feeding 
from a plant called Masapan, between the hours of nine and one 
o'clock. During this time it is seldom seen to alight, and then only 
for a very short time in any one place, but is constantly on the 

_wing, flitting from flower to flower, describing the segment of a 
circle in its flight, and sometimes almost touching the ground. For 
the remainder of the day very few are to be seen, and I think it 
probable that they visit the woods for certain kinds of mosquitoes, 
with which I have often found their stomachs well filled. 

“The pugnacity of this species is very remarkable. It is very 
seldom that two males meet without an aérial battle. The contest 
commences with a sharp cholerie shriek, after which, with dilated 
throats, the feathers of the whole of their bodies erected on end, 
and their tails outspread, they begin to fight with their bills and 
wings, and the least powerful soon falls to the ground or flies away. 
I have never known one of these battles last longer than about ten 
seconds; and in the specimens I have had under my notice in cages, 
their fighting has mostly ended in the splitting of the tongue of one 
of the two, which then surely dies from being unable to feed,” 


53 


52. CAMPYLOPTERUS ENSIPENNIS . - - + Vol. II. Pl. XLVI. 


_Trochilus ensipennis, Swains. 
Campylopterus ensipennis, Less. Jard., Bonap., Reichenb. 
Polytmus ensipennis, Gray & Mitch. | 
*Trochilus latipennis, Jard. Nat. Lib. Humming-Birds, vol. i. 
i: p- 116, pl. 34. | 
| * Campylopterus latipennis, Jard. ib. p. 153. 
i ensipennis, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 12. 


Habitat. The Island of Tobago. 


On reference to my account of Campylopterus Villavicencio, it 

will be seen that I was inclined to believe the C. splendens of M. 

a Lawrence to be identical with that bird; but on reconsidering the 
) - matter, and observing how numerous and how closely allied are the 
species of the genus Campylopterus, I now think it probable that 
it is really distinct. The throat in C. splendens is beautiful blue, 
and the abdomen washed with green; while in C. Vallavicencio, the 
whole of the under surface is pure grey. Both these birds have 
4 fine metallic-green crowns, which circumstance induced me to 
i believe that they were opposite sexes of one and the same species, 
and it is possible that they may yet prove to be so; but for the 


present I shall regard them as distinct. 


53. CAMPYLOPTERUS SFLENDENS, Lawr. . Vol. I. Pl. XLVII, 
(Upper fig.) 
* Campylopterus splendens, Lawr. in Ann. Lyc. Nat. Hist. New 
York, vol. vi. p. 262. 
Habitat. The forests between the upper waters of the Napo and 
Quito. 


54. CAMPYLOPTERUS VILLAVICENCIO . . Vol. II. Pl. XLVII. 
(Lower fig.) 
Trochilus Villaviscensio, Boure. 
Heliomaster Villaviscensio, Reichenb. 
Heliomastes villavisencio, Bonap. 


Habitat. Forests bordering the Rio Napo in Ecuador. 


55. CAMPYLOPTERUS LATIPENNIS. .. . Vol. II. Pl. XLVI 


I] Trochilus campylopterus, Gmel., Valenc., Drapiez. 
| | ———— cinereus, Gmel., Lath. 
largipennis, Bodd. : 
1 Bieeee —_———— latipennis, Lath., Vieill., Swains., Jard. 
Polytmus largipennis, Gray & Mitch. 
Ornismya latipennis, Less. 
Campylopterus latipennis, Swains., Jard., Bonap., Less., Reichenb. 
* Campylopterus latipennis, Cab. 1n Schomb. Reis. Guian. tom. ili. 


p- 709. 
* * 


’ Habitat. Cayenne and British Guiana. 
In my account of C, datipennis I have stated my belief that 


largipennis, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p.12.” 


54 


another species of that particular form would be found to inhabit 
Ecuador, as I have in my collection a specimen received direct 
from Quito which does not accord with C. latipennis nor with the bird 
I have called C. obscurus. The tipping of the two or three outer 
tail-feathers of this Ecuadorian bird is about a quarter of an inch 
in length. Judging from the form of the shafts of the primaries, it 
appears to be a female or a young male; and had I not seen very 
many specimens of C. latipennis, 1 should have supposed it to be- 
long to that species. The bill is a little longer than that of C. lati- 
pennis, and so also are the wings; as in that species, all the under 
surface is pure grey, while the upper part of the body is uniform 
green. I believe that two specimens from the same country are in 
the Loddigesian collection. Provisionally, I propose for this bird 
the name of C. Aquatorialis. 


56. CAMPYLOPTERUS /EQUATORIALIS, Gould. 
Habitat. The neighbourhood of Quito. 


57. CAMPYLOPTERUS oBSCURUS, Gould . . Vol. II. Pl. XLIX. 


Campylopterus obscurus, Gould, Bonap., Reichenb. 
Polytmus obscurus, Gray & Mitch. 


Habitat. Forests bordering the Lower Amazon. 


58. CAMPYLOPTERUS RUFUS, Less. ~. . . . « Vol. II. Pl. L. 
Campylopterus rufus, Less., Delatt., Bonap. 
Polytmus rufus, Gray & Mitch. 
* Platystylopterus rufus, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p.11; Id. Troch. 
Enum. p. 8, pl. 788. figs. 4834-35. 


Habitat. Guatemala. 


Mr. Salvin noticed that, during the first season of his residence in 
Guatemala, this species was so scarce at Duenas that he was induced 
to believe it to be an inhabitant of a higher district, especially as it 
was more numerous about Atitlan. The next year it was just as 
abundant, and, instead of being one of the rarest, was one of the 
most familiar species. He adds that the flowers of the Banana 
(Musa) were much resorted to by this bird. 


59. CAMPYLOPTERUS HYPERYTHRUS, 6k. SOS Vor TR Pia. 
* Campylopterus hyperythrus, Cab.in Schomb. Reis. Guian. tom. iii. 
p- 709. 
* Platystylopterus hyperythrus, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 11 ; 
» Id. Troch. Enum. p. 8, pl. 789. figs. 4836-38. 
* Loxopterus hyperythrus, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 13. 
Habitat. The Roraima Mountains, in the interior of British 
Guiana. 
Genus PumocuroA, Gould. 
(®axds, fuscus, et Xpda, color.) 


Generie characters. 
Male.—Bill longer than the head, and slightly arched; wings 


55 


large; the shafts of the first and second primaries slightly dilated ; 
tail moderately long and square, or very slightly rounded ; tarsi par- 
tially clothed ; feet rather large; hind toe shorter than the middle 
toe; claws short. 


60. Puyzocuroa CUVIERI. 
Campylopterus Cuvieri . . . . . . - + Vol. II. Pl. LU. 


Trochilus Cuvierii, Delatt. et Boure. 
Polytmus Cuviert, Gray & Mitch. 
Campylopterus Cuviert, Bonap., Reichenb. 
Aphantochroa Cuvieri, Bonap., Reichenb. 
* Aphantochroa Cuvieri, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 14. 


Habitat. Venezuela, New Granada, Panama, and Veragua. 


Gl. Pamocunos BRoperTi. . + .« «i>. *Woly He Pe iii 
.* Aphantochroa Roberti, Salv. in Proc. Zool. Soc. 1861, p. 203. 
Habitat. Vera Paz Mountains in Guatemala. 


We next arrive at a genus characterized by a very sombre style of 
colouring. It will be seen that I have proposed the generic appella- 
tion of Aphantochroa for the Trochilus cirrhochloris of Vieillot. 1 have 
since added another species to this form under the name 4. gularis. 
Up to the present moment (July 1861) no second specimen of this bird 
has been sent to Europe: when we receive others, it may be neces- 
sary to institute a still further subdivision ; but at present I do not 
know of any genus in which the bird could be more correctly placed 
than the one to which I have assigned it. 


Genus APHANTOCHROA, Gould. 


("Agayzos, obscurus, et xpda, color.) 

Generic characters. 

Male.—Bill stout, rather longer than the head, and slightly 
arched ; wings broad and moderately long ; tail square and mode- 
rately large; tarst clothed ; hind toe rather short. 

Sexes alike in the sombre colouring of the plumage. 


62. APHANTOCHROA CIRRHOCHLORIS . . .. Vol. II. Pl. LIV. 


Trochilus cirrhochloris, Vieill. 

Ornismya simplex, Less. 

Polytmus cirrhochloris, Gray & Mitch. 

Trochilus campylostylus, Licht. 

Campylopterus cirrhochloris, Bonap., Jard. 
* Campylopterus campylostylus, Burm. Th. Bras. ii. p. 329. 2. 
* Aphantochroa cirrochloris, Reich. Aufz. der Col. p. 15 ; Id. Troch. 
“Enum. p.12; Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil ii. p. 14. 


Habitat. Brazil. 


63. ApHANTocHROA GuLARIS, Gould . . ~ Vol. II. Pl. LV. 
Aphantochroa’ gularis, Gould. | 
Habitat. Banks of the Napo. 


56 
Genus Doterisca, Cab. 


The typical species of this form is the T’rochilus fallax of M. Bour- 
cier, a bird distinguished by its tawny-coloured breast, and by the 
white tippings of its outer tail-feathers. I wish it to be understood 
that I do not include in this genus the albicollis or the chiono- 
gaster, which have been inadvertently figured as pertaining to it. 
At the same time were I to state that the genus is confined to a 
- single species, I believe that I should be leading ornithologists into 
error ; for I have a specimen which, I think, will prove to belong to 
a second. The example in question, although bearing all the general 
characteristics of the 7. fadlax, differs in some minor details, and I 
shall therefore provisionally propose for it the specific name of 
cervina. 


64. DoLERISCA FALLAX. ; 
Lewetppus fallax, 4 he one % ei SORE VE, 


Trochilus fallax, Boure. 
—— (Lampornis ?) fulviventris, Gould. 
Polyimus fallax, Gray & Mitch. 
Leucippus fallax, Bonap., Reichenb. 
Doleromyia fallax, Bonap. 
*Dolerisca fallax, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil ui. p. 6. 


Habitat. Venezuela. 


65. DoLERISCA CERVINA, Gould. 
Habitat. Unknown. 


This new species is larger than the fadlax in all its admeasure- 
ments, and has a lesser amount of white on the tips of the outer 
tail-feathers. In fallax these greyish-white tippings occupy both 
webs of the apical portion of each of the three outer feathers, while 
in the cervina the inner webs only are thus marked ; these marks 
are about three-eighths of an inch long on the outer feather, a 
quarter of an inch on the next, and but a little more than an eighth 
on the third; the upper mandible in cervina is reddish brown, while 
in fallax the upper one is black. The habitat of the latter is well 
known to be Venezuela, but that of the former has yet to be ascer- 
tained. 

Genus Urocuroa, Gould. 
(Odpa, cauda, et ypda, color.) 

Generic characters. ~ 

Male.—Bill lengthened and straight, or slightly arched; wings 
moderately long and pointed; ¢az/ square; tarsi partly clothed ; 
hind toe as long as the middle toe; maz/s short. 


Female.— Unknown. 7 
Of this remarkable form only one species is at present known. 


66. Wmacteoa BOUCUERI <2 + $0. '@ aac 0 Obed y LIL 
Trochilus Bougueri, Boure. 


oF 


Ceeligena bougueri, Bonap. 
Celigena Bouguieri, Reichenb. 
Urochroa bougieri, Sclat. Proc. Zool. Soc. part 28. p. 95. 


Habitat. Nanegal, in Ecuador. 


Genus Srernociyta, Gould. 
(Brépvor, pectus, et cAvrds, insignis.) 

Generic characters. 

Male.—Bill unusually large, rather arched, and much longer than 
the head; wings ample; tac’ moderate and rounded ; farse partly 
clothed ; feet moderate; throat and breast luminous. 

Female.—Unadorned. 

Three outer tail-feathers tipped with white in both sexes. 


67. STERNOCLYTA cYANEIPECTUs, Gould . Vol. IL. Pl. LVIII. 


Trochilus (Lampornis) cyanopectus, Gould. 
Sternoclyta cyanopectus, Gould. 
Campylopterus cyantpectus, Bonap. 
Lampornis cyanopectus, Bonap. 
Sepiopterus cyanopectus, Reichenb. 
* Polytmus cyanopectus, Gray & Mitch. Gen. of Birds,vol. i. p. 108. 
Polytmus, sp. DA 
*Sternoclyta cyanipectus, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein, Theil iii. p. 13, 
ote. . , 
Habitat. The province of La Guayra in Venezuela. 


We now proceed to the genera Delattria, Celigena, Lamprolema, 
Eugenes, and their allies, all of which are peculiar to Central America ; 
at least, so far as is yet known, none of them have been found to the 
southward of the Isthmus; even Veragua, so far as we are awate, is 
not tenanted by any one of them. 

It may be considered by some ornithologists that here the sub- 
division of genera has been carried too far; but having once broken 
ground, and separated the old genus Trochilus,it would be inconsistent 
to place together in one genus all the members of this Central Ame- 
\ . tican group of Humming-Birds ; for while a certain degree of unity 

pervades them, no generic character could be found which would be 
applicable to the whole. This instance will serve most efficiently to 
illustrate the great diversity of closely allied forms which occur in 
the great family of Humming-Birds. We frequently find groups, 
like the present, so diversified that nearly every species demands 
a generic title, while in such genera as Thalurania, Petasophora, and 
Agleactis, the species, though as distinct as they well can be, possess 
characters common to all. Feild 


-% 


IT commence with the 


Genus EvGEenes, Gould. 
(Evyevis, nobilis. ) 
Generic characters. 
Male.—Bill straight, longer than the head; wings long. and 


a pn ERE ——————— 


58 


pointed; ¢azd moderate and very slightly forked; tarsi clothed ; 
feet rather small ; hind toe about equal in length to the middle one; 
crown and throat luminous. 

Female.—Unadorned. 

Of this form only one species is known; it is a native of Guate- 
mala and Southern Mexico, and is distinguished from its allies by 
the gorgeous colouring of its crown and breast. It is in the posses- 
sion of a luminous crown, and other characters, that this bird differs 
from that immediately following. 


GS. BUGENES PULGENS.......-.+..«. +.4..¥0b dle FL Bie 


Trochilus fulgens, Swains. 
Ornismya Rivolii, Less. 
Trochilus Rivolii, Jard. 
Mellisuga fulgens, Gray & Mitch. 
| Delatiria fulgens, Bonap. 
Celigena fulgens, Bonap. 
Celigena fulgens, Reichenb. 
* Coeligena fulgens, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p.3, pl. 686. figs.4513— 
14. 
* Kugenes fulgens, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 20. 
*Trochilus melanogaster, Licht. in Mus. Berlin. 
*—______. Rivoli, Swains. Birds of Brazil, pl. 76. 


Habitat. Mexico and Guatemala. 


“This species,” says Mr. Salvin, “is rare at Coban. The 
western boundary of the Llafio of Duefias is the spot where I have 
found it in the greatest numbers; indeed, with two exceptions, I 
have never met with it elsewhere. It is a most pugnacious bird. 
Many a time have I thought to secure a fine male, which I had 
perhaps been following from tree to tree, and had at last seen 
quietly perched on a leafless twig, when my deadly intention has 
been anticipated by one less so in fact, but to all appearance equally 
so in will. Another Humming-Bird rushes in, knocks the one [ 
covet off his perch, and the two go fighting and screaming away at 
a pace hardly to be followed by the eye. Another time this flying 
fight is sustained in mid air, the belligerents mounting higher and 
higher, till the one worsted in battle darts away, seeking shelter, 
followed by the victor, who never relinquishes the pursuit till the 
vanquished, by doubling and hiding, succeeds in making his escape. 
These fierce raids are not waged alone between members of the same 
species. Hugenes fulgens attacks with equal ferocity Amazilia du- 
merilii, and, animated by no high-souled generosity, scruples not to 
tilt with the little Trochilus colubris. 1 know of hardly any species 
that shows itself more brilliantly than this when on the wing ; yet it 
is not to the midday sun that it exhibits its splendour. When the 
southerly wind brings clouds and driving mist between the volcanos 
of Agua and Fuego, and all is as in a November fog in England, 
except that the yellow element is wanting, then it is that Hugenes 
JSulgens appears in numbers; Amazilia Devillei, instead of a few 
scattered birds, is to be seen in every tree, and Trochilus colubris in 


59 


reat abundance: such animation awakes in Humming-Bird life as 
would hardly be credited by one who had passed. the same spot an 
hour or two before; and the flying to and fro, the humming of 
wings, the momentary and prolonged contests, and the incessant 
battle-cries seem almost enough for a time to turn the head of a lover 
of these things. I have fifteen males from Dueiias to one female.’’ 
—Ibis, vol. i. p. 261. . 
Following the Eugenes fulgens is the softly coloured Delattria 
Clemencie of my work, the proper name of which is Ceeligena Cle- 
mencia, it being the type of the 


Genus Coiszenna, Less. 
69. Caxigena CLeMENCIm&, Less. ; 
Peis Clemencias ~~ | 0o.geueth enone eh DA, 


Ornismya Clemencie, Less. 
Lampornis Clemencie, Less. 
Celigena Clemencie, Less. 
Mellisuga Clemencie, Gray & Mitch. 
Delattria clemenciea, Bonap. 
Lampornis clemencia, Bonap. 

~ Ceeligena Clemencia, Reichenb. 

* Campylopterus Clemencie, Jard. Nat. Lib. Humming-Birds, vol. ii. 

; ag alae aa 

*Tyochilus lucidus, Licht. in Mus. of Berlin. 

*Cceligena Clemencia, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 3, pl. 687. fig. 4516; 

Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 15. 


Habitat. Mexico, where it is far from common. 
| The 
pikes Genus Lamprotama, Reichend. 
was instituted for the truly beautiful bird known as De Rham’s 


Garnet. 
. 70. LAMpROLEMA Ruamr .. . . . ~ Vol. II. Pl. LXI. 
Ornismya Rhami, Less. . 
' Ornismia Rhami, Delatt. et Less. 


Mellisuga Rhami, Gray & Mitch. 
- Lampornis rhami, Bonap. 
Delattria rhami, Bonap. 
Lamprolaima Rhami, Reichenb. 
_Heliodoxa Rhami, Reichenb. 
*Trochilus fulgidus, Licht. in Mus. of Berlin. | 
*Lamprolema Rhami, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 30. 


Habitat. Guatemala. 
We now come to the 


Genus DexatTris, Bonap. 


as restricted to the D. Henrici and D. viridipallens, both of which | 
species are natives of Guatemala. | 


60 


7s DetbatTrridA HenRict ><a eae tw > Vole. PL: LX. 


Ornysmia Henrica, Less. et Delatt. 
Topaza Henrica, Gray and Mitch. 
Delattria henrica, Bonap. 
——__—— henrici; Bonap. 
*Lamprolaima Henrici, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 9. 
*Heliodoxa Henrici, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 6, pl. 742. figs. 
4701-3. 


Habitat. Guatemala. 


72. DELATTRIA VIRIDIPALLENS « . . . Vol. LI. Pl. EXPL 


Trochilus viridi-pallens, Bourc. et Muls. 
Polytmus viridi-pallens, Gray & Mitch. 
Delattria viridi-pallens, Bonap. 
Thaumantias viridipallens, Bonap. 
Agyrtria viridipallens, Reichenb. 


Habitat. Guatemala. 


“* Occurs, in company with Petasophora thalassina, on the Volcan 
de Fuego. Seems to keep entirely to the forests‘of the voleano. I 
have never met with it in the plains below. This is one of the com- 
monest species at Coban. It may readily be recognized by the 
peculiar harshness of its note.””—Salvin in ‘ Ibis,’ vol. ii. pp. 40, 263. 


Near to these are the members of the 


Genus Hetiopzanpica, Gould. 
("HXoos, sol, et wardexds, juvenilis.) 


Generic characters. 

Male.—Bill straight, and rather longer than the head; head 
round, or with the feathers not advancing on the bill; ¢az/ slightly 
rounded, the feathers broad; tarsi clothed; hind toe shorter than 
the middle one; head and breast luminous. 

Female.—Unadorned. 


This genus comprises two species, both of which are natives of 
Central America, Mexico, and Southern California; they are some- 
what diminutive in size, and possess the white mark behind the eye 
which occurs in most of the members of the genera of this section 
of the Trochilide. 


73. HELIOPEDICA MELANOTIS . .-. - + Vol. II. Pl. LXIV. 


Trochilus melanotus, Swains. 
Ornismya Arsenni, Less. 
Trochilus leucotis, Vieill. ? 
Thaumatias leucotis, Bonap. ? 
Basilinna leucotis, Reichenb. ? 
*Trochilus leucocrotaphus, Shaw (Cabanis). 
Fa euculliger, Licht., Preis-Verz. Mex. Thier. v. Deppe & 
Schiede (Sept. 1830), no. 29, 31. 


61 


*Trochilus leucotis, Jard. Nat. Lib, Humming-Birds, vol. ii. 
p. 144. | 

* Hylocharis leucotis, Gray & Mitch. Gen. of Birds, vol. i. p. 114, 
Hylocharis, sp. 28. 

* Heliopedica melanotis, Sclat. & Salv. Ibis, vol. i. p. 130. 

* Basilinna leucotis, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil ii. p. 45. 

*Trochilus lucidus, Shaw? Gen. Zool. vol. viii. p. 327. 

* Mellisuga lucida, Steph. Cont. of Shaw, Gen. Zool. vol. xiv. p. 247. 

* Sapphironia lucida, Sallé, Liste des Oiseaux; Sclat. Proc. Zool. 
Soc. part xxvi. p. 297, and part xxvii. p. 386. 


Habitat. Guatemala and Mexico. 


I observe that specimens from Guatemala are much smaller than ¢ 
those from Mexico; but as the colouring and disposition of the 
markings are precisely similar, I regard them as races only. 

M. Sallé, in his ‘ List of the Birds of Mexico,’ has assigned to one 
of them the name of lucidus of Shaw, believing it to be an earlier 
name for this bird than melanotis or Arsennt. This list has been 
followed by Dr. Sclater in his papers on the birds received by 
M. Sallé from and collected by M. Boucard in Oaxaca ; but as 
Shaw’s description of Zucidus, as well as the country in which it is 
said to be found (Paraguay), does not accord with that of melanotis, 
that name must sink into a synorviym. 

‘In some of the open savannahs scattered among the oak-forests 
of the Volcan de Fuego near Calderas, this species is not uncommon ; 
I have also frequently met with it in some of the barrancos’ of the 
same volcano. The white mark running from the eye and the deep 
coral-red of the bill show conspicuously in the living bird. Itisa 
very shy species. A single specimen was shot near Coban, and 
another was brought to me from the mountains of 8. Cruz, near San 
Gerénimo.”’—Salvin in Ibis, vol. ii. p. 271. 


74. Heviopmpica Xantust. . . . . - Vol. II. Pl. LXV. 


Amazilia Zantusii, Lawr. 
Heliopedica castaneocauda, Lawr. 


Habitat. Southern California. 


If I have extolled the members of the genus Cometes as being 
among the most gorgeous birds in existence with regard to the 
colouring of their tails, in like manner I may pronounce the Topaze, 
which now claim our notice, to be as remarkable for their lustrous 
throat-marks. 

One of these beautiful birds, the Topaza Pella, is an inhabitant 
of Cayenne and the adjacent countries; while another, the 7. Pyra, 
flies in the forests of the Upper Rio Negro. 


Genus Topaza, G. R. Gray. 
iors Meh iach eee ee. + Vol, IL. Ph. Wee 


Polytmus Surinamensis longicaudus ruber, Briss. 
Trochilus pella, Linn. et Auct. 


62 


Falcinellus gutture viridi, Klein. 
Certhia Surinamensis, Spalowsky. 
Colkbri pella, Less. 
Topaza pella, Gray & Mitch., Bonap., Reick., Cabanis. 
* Trochilus paradiseus, Linn. Syst. Nat. tom. i. p. 189. 
*Lampornis pella, Jard. Nat. Lib. Humming-Birds, vol. ii. p. 155. 
Habitat. Cayenne and the adjacent countries. 


I find that specimens from Demerara have more-richly coloured 
throat-marks than those procured in Cayenne; there is also another 
variety distinguished by the great breadth of their lengthened tail- 
feathers ; but these differences are not of specific importance. 


few Lopa7e® PyRa 0. Mey Vol. If. Pl. LX VII. 


Trochilus ( Topaza) pyra, Gould. 
Topaza pyra, Gray, Bonap., Reichenb., Cabanis. 
Habitat. The Upper Rio Negro. 


It is only at a comparatively recent date that we became ac- 
quainted with the birds for which I proposed the term Oreotrochilus. 
D’Orbigny introduced to us the O. Estelle and O. Adele ; while in 
1846 the fine O. Chimborazo was brought to light through the 
researches of M. Bourcier; in 1849 the same gentleman made us 
aware of the existence of the little less beautiful O. Pichincha, and 
I, on my own part, had the pleasure of making known the O. mela- 
nogaster and O. leucopleurus. All these birds inhabit loftier eleva- 
tions than any other genus of Humming-Birds; for they love to 
dwell in regions just beneath the line where the melting snows and 
the warmth of the sun call forth an alpine flora and a peculiar 
character of insect life; and I question if any other insessorial birds 
seek their food at so great an elevation as the O. Chimborazo and 
O. Pichincha. As far as our present knowledge extends, no species 
has been found to the northward of Ecuador, while to the south 
they range along the highlands of Peru and Bolivia. 


Genus OREOTROCHILUS, Gould. 


(Opos, mons, et zpdxeAos, trochilus ; Mountain Humming-Bird.) 


Generic characters. 

Male.— Bill longer than the head, almost cylindrical, and slightly 
incurved ; wings rather long and powerful; ¢az/ large, the feathers 
narrow and rigid ; ¢arsi clothed; feet strong ; hind toe and nail about 
the same length as the middle toe and nail; throaé luminous. 

Female.—Unadorned. 


77. OrnEoTROCHILUS CHIMBORAZO . - - Vol. II. Pl. LXVIII. 


Trochilus Chimborazo, Boure. 
Oreatrochilus Chimborazo, Gould, Gray & Mitch., Bonap., Reich. 
* Orotrochilus Chimborazo, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 15, 
note. 


Habitat. Immediately below the snow-line round the cone of the 
voleanic mountain Chimborazo. 


63 


Mr. Fraser, who killed many examples at Panza, at an altitude of 
14,000 feet, says, “ Irides hazel ; bill, legs, and feet black. To be 
seen occasionally on the Arbor Maria, but feeds generally on a red 
thistle. It is common, and by no means shy, and has rather a pretty 
song, oft repeated, and to be heard at a considerable distance. In 
bad weather, when the wind is high, this bird is said to creep under 
and into the clumps of Paja (a species of Stipa).” 


73. OnroTRocuinus Picuincaa i . . . Vol. IL. Pl. LXIX. 


Trochilus Pichincha, Boure. et Mauls. 

Oreotrochilus Jamesoni, Jard. 

Pichincha, Bonap., Reichenb. 

* Orotrochilus Pichinchae, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 15. 


Habitat. The snow-line of the voleanic mountains of Pichincha 
and Cotopaxi in Ecuador. 


“ Guagua and Rueo Pichincha (14,000 feet alt.), many examples. 
The Pichincha Humming-Bird, like the Chimborazo, is found only 
close under the line of perpetual snow; but this species, according to 
the present state of our knowledge, is more widely distributed than the 
latter, being found not only on Pichincha, but also on Antisana and 
Cotopaxi. Upon my first visit to Guagua Pichincha these birds were 
feeding entirely on the ground, hunting the little moss-covered clumps 
as fast as the snow melted. They are not uncommon in this loca- 
lity, but always met with singly. They are very restless, but not 
shy, seldom remaining on one clump more than a second, then away 
to another, perhaps a yard distant. Sometimes they would take a 
rapid flight of 40 or 50 yards. On my second visit, the Chuquiragua 
(Chuquiraga insignis, Humb.) being in flower, they were feeding 
from it like the Quindi of Chimborazo, but still occasionally hunted 
the mossy clumps. They flit with a burr of the wings, and occasion- 
ally settle, with the feathers all ruffled, on the top of the Chuquira- 
gua or other small plant. In this respect, so far as my observations 
and those of Professor Jameson go, they differ from O. Chimborazo. 

“ June 5. No snow on the ground, and all birds were apparently 
scarce and shyer; these birds in particular were chasing each other, 
in twos and threes, like flashes of lightning.”—-Fraser in Proc. of 
Zool. Soc. part xxviii. p- 79. 


79, OrnzoTrocHitus EstELLH +--+ . . Vol. TE Pi LXX. 


Trochilus Estella, D’Orb. et La Fres. 

Orthorhynchus Estella, D’Orb. 

Trochilus Cecilie, Less. 

Oreotrochilus Estella, Gould, Gray & Mitch., Bonap., Cabanis. 
* Orotrochilus Estellae, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 16. 


Habitat. The high lands near La Paz in Bolivia. 


80. OREOTROCHILUS LEUCOPLEURUS, Gould . Vol. II. Pl. LXXI. 


Oreotrochilus leucopleurus, Gould, Gray & Mitch., Bonap., Rei- 
chenb. 
iy 


64. 


* Orotrochilus leucopleurus, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 16. 

*« Oreotrochilus leucopterus, Reichenb.”, Cab. et Hein. ib. 

* Trochilus Milleri, Lodd. MS.; Fras. in Proce. of Zool. Soe. 
part xi. p. 114. 


Habitat. The Chilian Andes. 


“This beautiful and rare species of Humming-Bird,” says Mr. 
Bridges, “is only found in the elevated valleys of the Andes, residing 
amongst storms of hail, rain, and thunder, and in places where the 
naturalist would least expect to find a species of T'rochilus. It 
subsists more upon small flies than upon the nectar of flowers. On 
examination of the crops I found them filled with flies, which they 
take before sun-down along the margin of the mountain rivulets. 
Specimens were taken at Los Ojos de Aqua, province of Aconcagua, 
at an elevation of from 6000 to 8000 feet, and I saw them at least 
1000 feet above that place. Iris brown.”—Proc. Zool. Soc. part xi. 

~ 114. 
Dr. Philippi met with this bird at Hueso Parado in Northern 
Chili, at an elevation of not more than 1000 feet above the sea-level. 


81. OREOTROCHILUS MELANOGASTER, Gould. Vol. I. Pl. LXXII. 
Oreotrochilus melanogaster, Gould, Gray & Mitch. Bonap., 
Reichenb. 
Orotrochilus melanogaster, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. 
p. 15, note. 
Habitat. The high lands of Peru; precise locality unknown. 


82. OrEotTrRocHitus ApELH . . . . . Vol. II. Pl. LUXXIII. 
Trochilus Adela, D’Orb. et Lafresn. 
Orthorhynchus Adela, D’Orb. 
Oreotrochilus Adele, Gould, Gray & Mitch., Bonap., Reichenb. 
* Orotrochilus Adelae, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 15, note. 


Habitat. Bolivia; the high lands around Chuquesaca being one 
of its localities. j 


I now proceed to the 


Genus Lampornis, Swains. 


This genus comprises many species, some of which inhabit the 
West Indian Islands, and others the mainland. The best-known 
among them, the Lampornis Mango, has a wider range than any of 
the others, as will be seen on reference to my account of that 
species. They are all distinguished by the harmonious colours of 
their ample tails, which are even more beautiful in the females than 
in the males. 


83. Lampornis Manco. . + + + + «+ Vol. II. Pl. LXXIV. 
Trochilus Mango, Linn. et auct- 
violicauda, Bodd. 
albus, Gmel. 
punctulatus, Gmel. 


Troehilus nitidus, Lath. 
Polyimus punctulatus, Briss. 
Trochilus atricapillus, Vieill.. 
fasciatus, Shaw. 
quadricolor, Vieill. 
nigricollis, Vieill, 
Lampornis Mango, Swains., Bonap. 
Polytmus Mango, Gray & Mitch. 
Anthracothorax Mango, Reichenb. 
* Trochilus punctatus, Vieill. Eney. Méth. Orn. part il. p. 550 
(young). 
*______ Jazulus, Less. Traité d’Orn. p. 290. 
*Lampornis Mango, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 19. 
Habitat. The eastern part of Brazil, Trinidad, Venezuela, and 
the high lands of New Granada. 


84. LAMPORNIS IRIDESCENS, Gould. 

This is the bird from Guayaquil which I have spoken of in my 
account of L. Mango as differing from the Mangos of the other 
parts of America. The chief differences are a rather shorter tail 
and a glittering wash of blue and green on the throat, instead of 
that part being velvety black; there is also a greater amount of 
green on the flanks. ‘Three specimens of this bird were killed and 
sent to me by Professor Jameson during one of his visits to the 
coast. 

Habitat. Guayaquil. 


85. LAMPORNIS PREVOSTT . - © + © = Vol. II. Pl. LXXV.. 


Trochilus Prevostii, Less., Bourc. 
Polytmus Prevostii, Gray & Mitch. 
Lampornis prevosti, Bonap. 
Anthracothorax Prevostii, Reichenb.. 
Habitat. Guatemala and Honduras. 


86. Lampornis VERAGUENSIS, Gowld . . Vol. IL. Pl. LXXVI. 

Lampornis Veraguensis, Gould, Bonap. j 

Sericotes Veraguensis, Reichenb. 

Anthracothorax Veraguensis, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p: 9, pl- 

793. fig. 4848. 

Lampornis Veraguensis, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Thiel. iii. p. 18. 

Habitat. Veragua and Costa Rica. 

Mr. Bridges “ found this species in the outskirts of the town of 
David, feeding among the flowers of a large arborescent species of 
Erythrina.” 


87. LAMPORNIS GRAMINEUS + + + * ¢ Vol. IL. Pl. LXXVIL. 
Trochilus gramineus, Linn. et auct. 

—— pectoralis, Lath., Vieill., Steph. 

maculatus, Gmel., Vieill. 

gularis, Gmel., Lath., Vieill. 


—_— 


66 


Trochilus marmeratus, Vieill. 
Polytmus dominicus, Gray & Mitch., Bonap. 
Lampornis dominicus, Bonap. 
Hypophania dominica, Reichenb. 
* Anthracothorax dominicus, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 9, pl. 792, 
figs. 4845-46. 
*Lampornis graminea, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 18. 


Habitat. Trinidad, Cayenne, and Guiana. 


63. LAWPORNIS VrRIDIS « 6 6 6n . Vol. IJ. Pl. LXXVIII. 


Trochilus viridis, Aud. et Vieill., Bonn., Dumont, Drapiez, Temm. 
Le Colibri eyanure, Trochilus viridis, Less. 
* Chalybura viridis, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 10. 
*Agyrtria viridis, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 7, pl. 765, figs. 
4771-72. 


Habitat. Porto Rico. 


89. LAMPORNIS AURULENTUS. . . . . Vol. II. Pl. UXXIX. 


Trochilus aurulentus, Vieill. et auct. 
Polyimus aurulentus, Vieill. 
margaritaceus, Gray & Mitch. 
Lampornis margaritaceus, Bonap. 
Eulampis aurulentus, Bonap. 
Margarochrysis aurulenta, Reichenb. 
Trochilus dominicus, Linn., Gmel., Lath., female ? 
Polytmus dominicus, Briss., female ? 


Habitat. St. Domingo. 


90. LAMPORNIS VIRGINALIS, Gould . . . Vol. II. Pl. LXXX. 


Crown and all the upper surface bronzy green; wings light pur- 
plish brown, shining greenish wax-yellow ; chest and centre of the 
abdomen black, passing into green on the flanks; upper tail-coverts 
brilliant bronzy green; two centre tail-feathers rich bronze, the re- 
mainder fine purple; margined and tipped with bluish black; bill 
black; feet dark brown. 

Total length 44 inches; bill 13; wing 22; tail Ii; tarsi 4. 

Habitat. The Island of St. Thomas. 


If I have led my friend, Alfred Newton, Esq., into an error, by 
causing him to state in the ‘Ibis,’ vol. i. p. 375, that the Lampornis 
aurulentus is found in the Island of St. Thomas : it was quite unin- 
tentional on my part. Since we made an examination and com- 
parison of specimens of aurulentus from St. Domingo, with those, 
which we believed to be identical, from St. Thomas, I have received 
numerous other examples from the latter island, a careful considera- 
tion of which induces me to regard them as distinct; and as such, I 
have described them under the name of Lampornis virginalis. The 
difference between this new species and awrulentus is very marked : 
it is of much smaller size, and has a shorter, more square, and 
differently coloured tail, the two centre feathers being rich bronze 


67 


instead of purplish black ; the throat-mark is richer; the upper tail- 
coverts are very much finer and more brilliant; and the bill is 
shorter. 


91. LAMPORNIS PORPHYRURUS . - + «+ > Vol Tie Pl TAXI. 


Trochilus porphyrurus, Shaw, Steph. 
bromicolor, Less. 
—_ = Filoresit, Boure. 
Polytmus porphyrurus, Gray & Mitch. 
Lampornis Mango, Gosse. 
porphyrurus, Bonap. 
floresi, Bonap. 
Floresia porphyrura, Reichenb. 
*Anthrocothorax porphyrurus, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 8, 
pl. 794. figs. 4849-50. 
* Lampornis porphyrura, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 19. 


Habitat. Jamaica. 


‘This species differs from all its allies in the female or the young 
male assimilating to the male in the colour of the tail, which is 
quite contrary to what occurs in the females of the other species; 
unlike them also, the female of this species has a different and more 
beautiful gorget than the male. This is one of the anomalies which 


cannot be explained, inasmuch as in structure, in size, and other . 


characters it is a true Lampornis. 


The genus Hulampis now claims our attention. It is composed 
of four species, the distinguishing features of which are their lumi- 
nous upper tail-coverts. These broad and glittering feathers, re- 
sembling: plates of shining metal, have doubtless been designed for no 
special purpose connected with the habits of the bird, but for mere 
ornament; but such characters, trifling though they be, are of no 
little use in enabling us to group together nearly allied species. It 
will be recollected that in some genera—that of Hypuroptila for in- 
stance—the under and not the upper tail-coverts are extraordinarily 
developed ; and many other instances might be cited of a similar 
development of other parts of the plumage, for which no other use 


but that of mere ornament can be conceived. The members of this \ 


genus differ from most others in the perfect similarity in the colour- 
ing of the sexes. So far as I am aware, they are all confined to the. 
West Indian Islands. / 


Genus EuLaAmpis, Boie. 
92, EuLAMPIs JUGULARIS- + - + + - Vol.IL. PE iok XL 


Trochilus jugularis, Linn., Gmel., Lath. Temm. 
- Eulampis jugularis, Bonap-, Reichenb. 
Polytmus jugularis, Gray & Mitch. 
Trochilus auratus, Gmel., Less. 
granatinus, Lath. 
———— Bancrofti, Lath. 
cyanomelas, Gmel. 


cae nat 


‘ 


Trochilus violaceus, Gmel. 
auritus, Vieill. 
Polytmus Cayennensis violaceus, Briss. 
Topaza violacea, Gray & Mitch. 
Certhia prasinoptera, Lath., Sparrm. 
Cynanthus ? jugularis, Jard. 
Trochilus cyaneus, Lath. 
—__———_ venustissimus, Gmel. 
* Bulampis jugularis, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 17. 


Habitat. The Islands of Nevis and Martinique. 


93. EULAMPIS HOLOSERICEUS . . . . Vol. II. Pl. LX XXIII. 
Trochilus holosericeus, Linn. et auct. 
Polytmus mexicanus, Briss. 
Trochilus aurigaster, Shaw. 
Polytmus holosericeus, Gray & Mitch. 
Eulampis holosericeus, Bonap. 
Sericotes holosericeus, Reichenb. 
* Anthracothorax holosericeus, Reichenb.Troch. Enum. p. 9, pl. 793 
fig. 484:7. 
* Trochilus atrigaster, “ Shaw,” Cabanis. 
* Bulampts holosericea, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 17. 


Habitat. Islands of Nevis? and Martinique ? 
94. EULAMPIS CHLOROLEMUS, Gould. . Vol. II. Pl. LXXXIV. 


Sericotes chlorolaimus, Reichenb. 
Eulampus chlorolemus, Bonap. 
* Anthrocothorax chlorolaimus, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 9. 
* Hulampis chlorolaema, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 17, 
note. 

Habitat. The Islands of St. Thomas and St. Croix. 

“ This bird,” says Mr. Edward Newton, speaking of the Hum- 
ming-Birds of St. Thomas and St. Croix, “ breeds from the end of 
March to the end of June. It is no easy matter to find its nest ; 
for on approaching within two or three yards of where it is, the 
bird, if it is on, is sure to fly at you, and then retreating remains 
suspended a few seconds just above your head, when it darts off and 
perches on some dead twig, most likely on the very tree which holds 
its nest. It does not stay here long, but takes short flights into the 
air, returning to the same place and, when there, showing its im- 
patience by a continual flirting, or rather twitching of its wings. If 
you then retire, keeping your eye on the bird, it will presently dart 
straight on to its nest, leaving it, however, at the least movement 
on your part. ‘This species is not particular as to the tree on which 
it builds, as I have found nests on the Silk-cotton, Mango, Man- 
chioneel, Avocado-Pear (Laurus persea, Linn.). They are placed 
on a horizontal branch, from half an inch to two inches thick, and 
are composed of cotton or the down of a species of Cactus, studded 
on the outside with white Lichen or shreds of bark, the whole 
structure measuring nearly two inches across, and built at the height 


69 


of from about five to fifteen feet from the ground, sometimes concealed 
by leaves, at others on an almost naked bough.”—J6is, vol. i. p. 140. 

Mr. Newton informs me that the yellow of the base of the bill and 
gape of this bird shows rather conspicuously. 


95. EuLAmPiIs LoncIRosTRIs, Gould. 


In its size, general plumage, and style of colouring, this bird is 
very similar to the EZ. chlorolemus; but the much greater length 
and curvature of its bill will, I am sure, satisfy the most sceptical 
that it is quite distinct. I possess two examples of this, both of 
which are unfortunately ina very bad state of plumage. One of these 
was presented to me by my valued friend Sigismund Rucker, Esq., 
the other I obtained on the continent; I could gain no information 
whatever as to its native locality. The average length of the bill in 
E. chlorolemus is three-quarters of an inch, while that of B. longi- 
rostris is nearly an inch and a quarter. 


Habitat. Unknown. 


There is scarcely a more isolated form in the family of T’rocht- 
lide than that for which the generic name of Lafresnaya was pro- 
posed by Bonaparte in honour of the venerable Baron de Lafresnaye, 
and it gives me great pleasure to assist in perpetuating the name of 
a French nobleman, lately deceased, who devoted the leisure hours 
of a long life to the pleasing study of natural history. 

Strictly confined to the Andes, one of the species is quite equa- 
torial, the others fly several degrees further north. The males are 
very boldly coloured, the brilliant green of their throats and flanks 
being beautifully relieved by the velvety black of the abdomen. 
The females have none of these contrasted colours, their entire 
under surface being spangled with green on a white or a buff ground. 
The species known are very much alike except in the colouring and 
markings of the tail,—one of them having the four outer feathers 
white tipped with purplish black, while the same feathers in another 
are buff tipped with bronzy brown, and the tail of the third is white 
tipped with greenish bronze. 


‘Genus Larresnaya, Bonap. 
06. LAFRESNAYA FLAVICAUDATA . . .~ Vol. II. Pl. LXXXV. 
Trochilus flavieaudatus, Fras. 
Lafresnayi, Boiss. 
Calothoraz Lafresnayi, Gray & Mitch. 
Lafresnayi flavicaudatus, Bonap. 
—_——__—— flavicaudata, Reichenb., Bonap. 
*Entima Lafresnayi, Cab. et Hein. Mas. Hein. Theil iii. p. 51. 
Habitat. The high lands of New Granada. Common at Bogota 
and Popayan; and probably in the northern parts of Ecuador. 


Oe Tigrinya Gavt sows  VOLIL Pl. LXXXVE 


Trochilus Gayi, Boure. et Muls. 
Calothorax Gayi, Gray & Mitch. 


70 


Lafresnaya gayi, Bonap. : 
*Entima Gayi, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 51. 


Habitat. Ecuador and Peru. 


98. LAFRESNAYA SAULZ. 
* Trochilus Saule, Boure. Rev. Zool. 1846, p. 309. 
* Calothorax Saulit, Gray & Mitch. Gen. of Birds, vol. i. p. 110, 
Calothorax, sp. 3. 
* Lafresnaya Saule, Bonap. Consp. Gen. Av. tom. i. p. 68, Lafres- 
nayda, Sp. 3. 
* Saul, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 11. 


Habitat. Unknown: supposed to be Popayan. 


Since writing my account of Lafresnaya Gayi I have received 
many additional examples, all of which had white tails tipped with 
purplish black; but I possess fully adult examples of a white-tailed 
bird named Sau/e, by M. Bourcier, in which the tippings are 
bronzy green. My specimens were brought by Delattre; but from 
what locality,is unknown. The difference mentioned seems to warrant 
the belief that the bird is distinct ; and I therefore give it a place in 
this synopsis, notwithstanding the opinion to the contrary expressed 
in my account of L. Gayi. 


Those who have not closely studied the Humming-Birds have 
but little idea how diversified are their forms; the birds next to be 
considered are unlike all the other members of the family. The 
species are short, thick-set birds, with a very peculiar style of 
plumage, have their crowns plated with metal-like feathers, and bills 
as straight and sharp as needles ; and woe to any bird, should say, 
which gave offence to the members of this genus. 

I am exceedingly puzzled with respect to the species of this form ; 
that is, I am at a loss to determine whether they are two, three, four, 
or five in number. First, with regard to Johanne, whose under- 
surface is black, and frontal mark violet-blue; I have always re- 
garded this colouring as indicative of the adult, but I am in doubt 
whether the skins which frequently accompany them from Bogota, 
and which assimilate in size and form, but differ in having a green 
frontlet and a dull-green upper and under surface, are the females 
or young males of this bird, or if they be distinct. Of the Ludovicie, 
which comes from Bogota, I have many examples, all of which are 
very uniform in size and style of colouring. From Quito I have 
another bird assimilating to the Ludovicie most closely in colouring, 
but which is about a fifth larger in all its admeasurements. Accom- 
panying the specimens from this latter locality is one without any 
frontal mark whatever; in other respects it is precisely like the rest, 
and, I am sure, is a fully adult bird. Is this the female of the Quitan 
birds, or a distinct species? I have never seen examples in this 
state of plumage among the numerous specimens sent from Bogota. 
I think I shall be right in regarding the Ecuadorian bird as distinct, 
and I therefore propose for it the name that of rectirostris. 


71 


Genus DoryFera, Gould. | 
(Aépy, hasta, et pépw, fero; Lance-bill.) 

Generic characters. 

Male.— Bill \ong, basal half straight, apical half inclined upwards 
and pointed ; wings of moderate size; tail rounded, the feathers 
broad and rigid ; ¢arsi partly clothed ; Aind doe and nail as long as 
the middle toe and nail ; forehead luminous ; plumage adpressed. 

Female.—I believe the female is destitute of the forehead mark ; 
but this is uncertain. 


99. DorYFERA JOHANNE .. .. . Vol. II. Pl. LUXXXVII. 


Trochilus Johanne, Boure. . 
Mellisuga Johanne, Gray & Mitch. 
Trochilus (Doryfera) violifrons, Gould. 
Dorifera Johanne, Bonap. 
* Hemistephania Johanne, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 9. 
* Helianthea Johanne, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 6, pl..731. figs. 
4675-76. 
* Doryphora Johanne, Cab.et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p.78, note. 


Habitat. New Granada. 


100. DoryrerA Lupovicim . . . . Vol. II. Pl. LXXXVIII. 


Trochilus Ludovicie, Bource. et Muls. 
Mellisuga Ludovicie, Gray & Mitch. 
Dorifera ludovicie, Bonap. 
* Hemistephania Ludovicie, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 9. 
* Helianthea Ludovicia, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 6, pl. 731. figs. 
4673-74. 
Doryphora Eudovicie, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 77. 


Habitat. New Granada. 


101. DoryFERA RECTIROSTRIS, Gould. 


Bill and feet black; tarsi clothed with brown feathers ; forehead 
brilliant glittering green ; crown and back of the neck reddish bronze, 
passing into dull green on the back ; upper tail-coverts washed with 
blue; tail black, tipped with greyish-brown, largely on the external 
feathers, slightly on the middle ones; under surface olive; under 
tail-coverts grey ; wings purplish brown. 

Total length 5 inches; bill 1}; wing 23; tail 13. 

Habitat. Ecuador. 


How remarkable it is that development and even beauty should 
be bestowed upon the under tail-coverts of a bird! yet this is often 
found to be the case: the Marabou Stork may be cited as an in- 
stance in point among the larger birds, and the genera Eriocnemis, 
Erythronota, &c. among the Trochilide. In no group, however, is 
this feature so conspicuously marked as in the members of the 
succeeding genus Chalybura ; there it is carried to its maximum and 
is rendered so much the more apparent from the striking contrast 
of the snow-white plumed under tail-coverts with the dark or black 


72 


colouring of the tail-feathers. These birds form a very natural 
section of the Trochilide. Venezuela, New Granada, and Panama 
may be regarded as their head quarters,—two of the species, C. Buf- 
foni and C. ceruleogaster, being frequently sent in collections from 


Bogota. : 
Although the sexes of this genus of birds are very differently 


coloured, the females have the plumed under tail-coverts as well as 
the males. : 
Genus Cuatysura, Reichenb. 
102. CHaLyBuRA BuFFONI. 
Hypuroptila Buffoni. . . - + - > Vol. II. Pl. LXXXIX. 


Trochilus Buffonii, Less., Sard. 
Polyimus Buffoni, Gray & Mitch. 
Lampornis buffoni, Bonap., Jard. 
*Chalybura Buffoni, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p.10; Cab. et Hein. 


Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 20. 
*Agyrtria Buffonii, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 7, pl. 766. 
figs. 4773-74. 
Habitat. Venezuela and New Granada. 


103. CHALYBURA UROCHRYSEA, Gould. 
Hypuroptila urochrysea, Gould . . + + + Vol. II. Pl. XC. 
Hypuroptila urochrysa, Gould in Proe. of Zool. Soc. part xxix. 


p- 198. 
Habitat. Panama. 
104. CHALYBURA CERULEOGASTER, Gould. 
Hypuroptila ceeruleogaster, Gould. “9 > eee Vol, TE. Pl. XW. 
Trochilus ( Glaucis ?) ceruleogaster, Gould. 
Polytmus ceruleogaster, Gray & Mitch. 


Lampornis ceruleigaster, Bonap. 
* Oyanochloris coeruleiventris, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 10. 


*Agyrtria coeruleiventris, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 7, pl. 77. 
* Chalybura caeruleiventris, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 20. 
Habitat. New Granada. 


105. CHALyBURA? IsauRz, G'ould. 


Hypuroptila Isaure, Gould in Proce. of Zool. Soc. part xxix. 
p- 198. 

Head, all the upper surface, wing-coverts, flanks, and abdomen 
coppery bronze, inclining to purple on the lower part of the back 
and upper tail-coverts ; wings purplish-brown; tail very dark 
bronze, inclining to purple; throat and breast grass-green ; under 
tail coverts white ; upper mandible black; under mandible fleshy 
with a black tip; tarsi yellow or flesh colour. 

Total length 42 inches ; bill 145; wing 23; tail 1}; tarsi q. 

Habitat. The Bocca del Toro in Costa Rica. 


73 


The specimen from which the above description was taken, is 
somewhat immature; it is, however, sufficiently advanced to show 
that it would have, when adult, a fine green breast; but whether 
the green colour would extend over the abdomen, I am unable 
to say. It is nearly equal in size to the C. urochrysea, C. Buffoni, 
and C. ceruleigastra ; but it has a shorter wing and a more rounded 
tail than either of those species, and the under tail-coverts, though 
white, are less plume-like in form. It is just possible that it may be 
necessary to separate this bird into a new genus when we see it in 
its fully adult state; but it appears at present to be most nearly 
allied to the members of the genus in which I have provisionally 
placed. I received this bird from M. Edouard Verreaux, of Paris, 
many years ago, and I have never seen another. 

The name of Jsaure was suggested to me by my late highly 
valued friend the Prince Charles Lucien Bonaparte, who wished thus 
to convey a compliment to Madame la Baronne de Lafresnaye, the 
niece of Montbeillard, the able coadjutor of the celebrated Buffon. 


Genus IotamaA, Growld. 
(“Iov, viola, et Aaupds, gula.) 

Generic characters. 

Male.— Bill considerably longer than the head and slightly arched ; 
wings long and curved ; primaries rigid, of moderate length, and 
forked; farsi clothed ; feet rather small ; hind toe shorter than the 
middle toe; nails short and curved. 

This genus was proposed for the Trochilus Schreibersii of Lod- 
diges; and of this form Mr. G. N. Lawrence, of New York, has 
made us acquainted with a second species in his Jolema frontals. 
Both these birds inhabit the eastern slopes of the Andes of Ecuador 
and forests bordering the River Napo. 


106. IovzMa FRontTaALis, Lawr. . . . - Vol. Il. Pl. XCII. 
Habitat. The head-waters of the Napo. 


107. IonmmA ScuREIBERSI . . . . . . Vol. II. Pl. XCIIL. 


Trochilus Schreibersii, Lodd. MS. 
Calothorax? Schreibersii, Gray & Mitch. 
Thalurania Schreibersii, Bonap. 
Tonolaima Schreibersii, Reich. 
Campylopterus Schreiberst, Bonap. 


Habitat. The forests bordering the Upper Rio Negro and the 
Napo. 

The Blanes composing the Andean genera to which the names of 
Heliodoxa and Leadbeatera have been given are all truly beautiful 
birds. ‘They are of large size, and have certain parts of their plu- 
mage more than usually resplendent,—so much so, indeed, that no 
bird has yet been found which equals them in this respect. From 
Venezuela and New Granada on the north to Bolivia in the south, 
the various members of these genera find a congenial habitat. 


74: 


Genus Hettopoxa, Gould. 
(“HAwos, sol, et ddéa, gloria.) 

Generic characters. 

Male.— Bill longer than the head, straight and cylindrical ; wings 
long and pointed ; tail ample and forked ; tars clothed ; feet small ; 
hind toe shorter than the middle one; nazls feeble; centre of the 
throat blue, surrounded by brilliant green. 

Female.— Unadorned. 


108. Hettopoxa sacuLta, Gould . . . . Vol. II. Pl. XCIV. 


Leadbeatera jacula, Bonap., Reichenb. 
* Coeligena jacula, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 4, pl. 688. fig. 4522. 
* Heliodoxa jacula, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 22. 


Habitat. New Granada. 
109. Hetropoxa JAMEsonI . . . . ~ ~ Vol. JI. Pl. XCV. 


Trochilus Jamesoni, Boure. 

Leadbeatera Jamesoni, Bonap., Reichenb. 
Coeligena Jamesoni, Reichenb. 
Heliodoxa Jamesoni, Sclat., Cab. 


Habitat. Ecuador. . 
Hitherto I have entertained the opinion that the yacula and Lead- 


beateri were of the same form ; but upon further consideration I now 
believe them to be distinct; and as the former is the type of my 


genus Heliodoxa, I retain that of Leadbeatera for the other. 


Genus LeapBEATERA, Bonap. 


. Of this form I possess three very distinct birds, which might be 
| considered by some persons as one and the same, but in this opinion 
' I cannot agree: the Ofero from Bolivia, and the Leadbeateri are too 
unlike to be considered otherwise than as separate species ; while 
the third, which is from Venezuela, is allied to the Bolivian bird 
rather than to that from New Granada. 


- 110. LEADBEATERA OTERO. 
Palindoxe Oterd 6 6 Wet te ee ee Ae VE 


Trochilus Otero, Tschudi. 
Leadbeatera otero, Bonap., Reichenb. 
*Colligena Otero, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 3, pl. 689. figs. 
4523-24. 
* Heliodora Otero, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 22, note. 
* Leadbeatera sagitta, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 7. 
* Coeligena sagitta, Reichenb. Ib. p. 23; Id. Troch. Enum. p. 4, 
pl. 689. fig. 4525, and pl. 690. figs. 4527-28. 
* Heliodoxa sagitta, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 22. 


Habitat. Peru and Bolivia. 
111. LeapBEaTERA SPLENDENS, Gould. 
Centre of the crown brilliant blue, bordered on each side with jet- 


18 


black; upper surface bronzy green; wings purplish brown; two 
centre tail-feathers bronzy, the remainder black; under surface 
glittering green ; under tail-coverts olive-grey ; bill black ; feet dark 
brown. 
Total length, 54 inches ; bill 14, ; wing ae; tail 94; tarsi 4. 
Habitat. Venezuela. 


This species is very nearly allied to the Leadbeatera Otero, but it 
differs in having a straighter and shorter bill, and in the green tint 
of the under surface. 


112. LEADBEATERA GRATA. 


Heliodoxa Leadbeatert . . . . . - « Vol. II. Pl. XCVIL. 
Trochilus Leadbeateri, Bourc. 

Leadbeatera grata, Bonap. 

Mellisuga Leadbeateri, Gray & Mitch. 

Heliodoxa Leadbeateri, Sclat. 


Habitat. The hilly parts of New Granada. 


' It matters not where we place the single species of the genus 
Aithurus (Trochilus polytmus, in the body of the work), since it 
offers no direct alliance to any one group. It is perhaps the most 
singular and most aberrant of Humming-Birds : for it departs from 
all the rest in the form of its wings, the second feather being the 
longest, while in all the others the first exceeds the rest in length ; 
how different also are its other characters! for instance, the tail 
is not forked in the usual way, the second feather being lengthened 
into flowing plumes, which apparently tend more to add to its , 
graceful appearance than to. facilitate its aérial evolutions. The | 
young males do not possess this peculiarly formed tail; and the 
females are so unlike both, that we should not have even suspected 
their alliance, had we not positive evidence of it. This very isolated 
form is a native of Jamaica, and there alone is it found. That so 
large a bird and so very marked a form should be confined to such 

a limited area is very surprising. | 


Genus Airnurus, Cab. 
113. AITHURUS POLYTMUS. 
Trochilus polytmus . - + + + + + ~ Vol. II. Pl. XCVIII. 


Mellisuga Jamaicensis atricapilla, cauda bifurca, Briss. 
Mellivora avis maxima, Sloane. 
Trochilus polytmus, Linn. et auct. 
Ornismya cephalatra, Less. 
*Cynanthus polytmus, Jard. Nat. Lib. Humming-Birds, vol. ii. 
2145. : 
*Polytmes cephalatra, Bonap. Consp. Gen. Av. tom. i. p. 72, 
Polyimus, sp. 1. 
*—_______ Ib. sp.2.; Trochilus stellatus, “ Gosse,” young male? 
* Trochilus Maria, Hill, Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist. ser. 2. vol. iii. 
p. 258, 1849; Gosse, Ill. Birds of Jamaica, pl. 22. 


76 


* Polytmus viridans, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p 11; Id. Troch. 
Enum. p. 9, pl. 799. figs. 4858-60. 

Aithurus polytmus, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 50. 

Habitat. Jamaica. 

It will be seen that I have placed the séellatus of Gosse as a 
synonym of Polytmus ; at the same time it is only justice to state 
that I have never seen a second specimen in a similar state of plu- 
mage, and it may be another species. I make this remark with Mr. 
Gosse’s type specimen before me, it having been kindly presented 
to me by that gentleman. 


Genus THALURANIA, Gould. 


(OddXw, vireo, et odpdrios, ccelestis.) 


If all genera were as well defined as that of Zhalurania, the 
ornithologist would be far less perplexed than he frequently is with 
regard to the position of the species of which they are composed. 
All the members of this extensive group are characterized by great 
elegance of contour, the bill, wings, and tail being well propor- 
tioned, and in harmony with the size of the body ; green and blue 
are the prevailing hues of the under surface, while the crown and 
throat, and sometimes the shoulders, are ornamented with blue. 
The females are less elegant in form, and not so beautifully attired, 
all those parts which are green and blue in the males being, in every 
instance I believe, of a dull grey. 

The extent of country ranged over by the members of this group 
is very great: one, and one only, has been found to the north of 
Panama; the remainder inhabit all the countries southward to the 
latitude of Rio de Janeiro. 


14s THALURANIA GLAUCOPIS “SS eo. Vel Ee 2 Ex, 


Trochilus glaucopis, Gmel., Pr. Max., Vieill., Jard. 
Mellisuga Brasiliensis, cauda bifurca, Briss. ? 
Ornismya glaucopis, Less. 
Polytmus glaucopis, Gray & Mitch. 
Trochilus frontalis, Lath. 
Thalurania glaucopis, Bonap., Reichenb. 
Coeligena glaucopis, Reichenb. 
*Cynanthus glaucopis, Jard. Nat. Lib. Humming-Birds, vol. ii. 
p- 147. 
* Glaucopis frontalis, Burm. Th. Bras. tom. ii. p. 333. 
* Thalurania glaucopis, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 23. 
Habitat. South-eastern Brazil. 


115. THALURANIA WATERTONI . - + + ~~ Vol. If. Pl. C. 


Trochilus Watertoni, Lodd., Boure. 
Polytmus Watertoni, Grey & Mitch. 
Thalurania Watertoni, Bonap. 

— Whatertoni, Reichenb. 
Coeligena Whatertoni, Reichenb. 


Habitat. British Guiana; and Northern Brazil ? 


eis 


I9GC2PRALORANIA FURCATA ©« °o o> ss “We Ole er CL 


Mellisuga Jamaicensis, violacea, cauda bifurca, Briss. 

Trochilus furcatus, Gmel., Lath., Shaw, Vieill., Steph., Jard. 

Ornsmya furcata, Less. 

Polytmus furcatus, Gray & Mitch. 

Thalurania furcata, Gould, Bonap. 

_furcatus, Bonap. 

*Cynanthus furcatus, Jard. Nat. Lib. Humming-Birds, vol. ii. 
p- 148. 

* Thalurania Gyrinno, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 7. 

*Coeligena Gyrinno, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 3, pl. 682. figs. 
4500-1. 

* Thalurania furcata, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 24. 

*__—_+_____—. furcata, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 7. 

*Coeligena furcata, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 3, pl. 682. figs. 
4498-99. 

* Trochilus furcatus, Burm. Th. Bras. tom. ii. p. 335. 

Habitat. Cayenne and Guiana. 


117. THALURANIA FURCATOIDES, Gould. 
Thalurania furcatoides, Gould, in text to 7. furcata. 
Habitat. Para and the lower part of the Amazon. 


This bird is very like 7. furcata, but is of smaller size, has a much 
less-forked tail, and the breast ultramarine-blue instead of purplish- 
blue. I haveat this moment seven specimens before me, all of which 
are alike, and readily distinguishable from the Cayenne bird. 


118. THALURANIA FORFICATA, Cab. 
* Thalurania forficata, Cab. et Hein. in Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 24. 
Habitat. Supposed to be the neighbourhood of Para. 


Through the kindness of Dr. Peters, the Director of the Royal 
Museum of Berlin, I have had their specimen of 7’. forficata sent 
to me for comparison. It is certainly distinct from any of the 
species contained in the collections of this country: in size it is 
nearly the same as 7. furcata; but its bill is rather shorter, its tail 
longer, more deeply forked, and of a purplish-black colour instead 
of steely black: it differs from that bird also in having the blue 
colouring more extended down the back, approaching to that of 
Watertoni; the green of the throat is circumscribed and truncate 
below, as in furcata; and the crown of the head is black, but near 
the centre is a single small blue feather: I think it likely that this 
is accidental, as the bird appears to be fully adult: the under tail- 
coverts are black. 


119. THALURANIA REFULGENS, Gould . . . Vol. II. Pl. CII 


Thalurania refulgens, Gould, Bonap., Reichenb. 
Coeligena refulgens, Reichenb. 
Habitat. Unknown ; supposed to be Venezuela. 


78 


190. THaLurania Tscuuptt, Gould. . . . Vol. Il. PL. CHL. 
Trochilus furcatus, Tschudi. 
Habitat. Ucayali and the eastern part of Ecuador. 


121. THALURANIA NIGROFASCIATA, Gould. . Vol. II. Pl. CIV: 


Trochilus (—?) nigrofasciatus, Gould. 

Thalurania nigrofasciata, Gould, Reichenb., Cab. 
— nigrofasciatus, Bonap. 

Polytmus nigrofasciatus, Gray & Mitch. 

Thalurania nigrofasciata, Bonap. 

Coeligena nigrofasciata, Reichenb. 

Thalurania viridipectus, Gould, Bonap., Reichenb. 

Coeligena viridipectus, Reichenb. 


Habitat. Upper Amazon and Rio Napo. 


122. THALURANIA vENUSTA, Gould . . + - Vor 12 Fa cy. 


Trochilus ( Thalurania) venusta, Gould. 
) puella, Gould. 
Thalurania venusta, Gould, Bonap., Reichenb. 
— puella, Bonap., Reichenb. 
* Coeligena venusta, Reichenb., Troch. Enum. p. 3, pl. 683. figs. 
4504-5. 
: puella, Reichenb. Ib. p. 3. 


Habitat. Chiriqui in Costa Rica. 


123. THALURANIA COLUMBICA-. - + + + + Vol. II. Pl. CVI. 


Ornismya Colombica, Boure. et Muls. 
Polytmus Columbicus, Gray & Mitch. 
Thalurania Columbiana, Gould. 
— colombiea, Bonap. 
— columbica, Reichenb. 
i’ — columbica, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iti. p. 24. 


Habitat. The hilly parts of New Granada. 


124. THALURANIA VERTICEPS, Gould . - - Vol. II. Pl. CVII. 


Trochilus ( Thalurania) verticeps, Gould. 
Thalurania verticeps, Gould, Bonap. 
Thalurania Lydia, Reichenb. 
Riccordia verticeps, Reichenb. 
* Chlorestes verticeps, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p.4, pl. 705. fig. 
4590. 


Habitat. Ecuador. 


125. THALURNIA FANNIE. 


Trochilus Fanny?, Bourc. et Delatt. 
Hylocharis Fannyi, Gray & Mitch. 
*Coeligena Fanny, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 3, pl. 683. figs. 
4502-3. 


79 


* Thalurania Fanny, Bonap. Rev. et Mag. de Zool. 1854, p. 254; 
Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 23. 

Habitat. The Andes of Quindios. 

I have a specimen of this bird, collected by Warszewicz on the 
Cordillera of Quindios, which is precisely the same with the type 
specimen of the 7. Fannyi of MM. Bourcier and Delattre. It 
differs from my 7. verticeps in being considerably smaller and in 
having the abdomen purple-blue in lieu of cold prussian-blue. 


126. THALURANIA ERIPHYLE . ... Vol. I. Pl. CVI. 
Ornismya Eriphile, Less. 
Polytmus Eriphile, Gray & Mitch. 

Thalurania eryphila, Bonap. 
Eryphile, Reichenb. 
————- eriphile, Bonap., Gould. 
Ornismya meriphile, Less. in err. 
* Coeligena Eryphile, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 3, pl. 582. figs. 
4507-8. 
* Glaucopis eriphile, Burm. Th. Bras. tom. ii. p. 334. 
* Trochilus excisus, Licht. in Mus. of Berlin. 
* Thalurania eryphile, Cab. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 23. 
Habitat. Eastern Brazil. 
197. THALURANIA? WAGLERI. . . . « + Vol, II. Pl CIX. 
Ornismya Waglerii, Less. 
Trochilus Waglerii, Jard. 
Cynanthus Waglerii, Jard. 
Hylocharis Wagleri, Gray & Mitch. 
Thalurania wagleri, Bonap., Reichenb. 
* Trochilus bicolor, Vieill. Ois. dor., tom. i. p. 75, pl. 36. 
* Coeligena Wagleri, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 3, pl. 702. figs. 
4576-77. 
* Thalurania Wagleri, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 24. 
Habitat. Brazil. 


The three species constituting my genus Panoplites very closely 
resemble each other in size, in structure, and in the markings of 
their tails, but are very dissimilar in the colouring of their bodies. 
They are all inhabitants of the Ecuadorian Andes, and one of them 
(P. flavescens) extends its range as far north as Bogota. The 
most remarkable species of this form is the P. Jardinei, whose glit- 
tering upper surface is wonderfully brilliant. 


Genus Panoruites, Gould. 
(Havorhirys, omnino armatus. ) 


Generic characters. 

Male.—Bill strong, and a trifle longer than the head; body stout 
and thick-set ; wings long and pointed ; fail moderately long and 
square, the feathers broad ; ¢arsz clothed and stout ; hind toe strong, 
and of the same length as the middle one; mails short. ; 

Female—Very similar to the male in plumage. 

G2 


198; Pawopiives JARDINEDS. 26 eso seu Vol HPL CK. 


Trochilus Jardini, Boure. : 
Florisuga jardinii, Bonap., Reichenb. : 
* Panoplites Jardinet, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 75, note. 


Hobitat. Nanegal and other warm parts of Ecuador. 


129. PANOPLITES FLAVESCENS. .,. . + - Vol. II. Pl. CXI. 


Trochilus flavescens, Lodd. 

Ornismia paradisea, Boiss. 

Mellisuga flavescens, Gray & Mitch. 

Amazilius flavescens, Bonap. 

Clytolema flavescens, Bonap. 
* Boissonneaua flavescens, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 11; Id. Troch. 

Enum. p. 8, pl. 787. figs. 4830-31. 

* Panoplites flavescens, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 74. 
* Trochilus Lichtensteinii, Saucer. in Mus. of Berlin. 


Habitat. Ecuador and New Granada. 


130. Panoptires MattnHewst .. . . . Vol. Il. Pl. CXII. 


Trochilus Matthewsi, Lodd., Bourc. 
Mellisuga Matthews, Gray & Mitch. 
Clytolema matthewsi, Bonap. 
* Heliodoxa Maitthewsii, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 9. 
* Boissonneaua Matthewsii, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 8, pl. 787. 
figs. 4832-33. 
* Panoplites Matthewsi, Cab.et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p.74, note. 


Habitat. Ecuador. 


Somewhat allied to the Panoplite, are the members of the 


Genus FLorisuca, Bonap., 


all of which are remarkable for their‘large fan-shaped tails, and for 
having all the feathers of this organ white. The females are less 
strikingly coloured. One of the species, F’. mellivora, enjoys a most 
extensive range; for it inhabits alike the low lands of Northern Brazil, 
Cayenne, Guiana, Trinidad, Venezuela, the temperate regions of New 
Granada, and Central America; the other two are confined to more 
limited areas. The F. mellivora and fF’. atra are among the oldest- 
known and the commonest of the Humming-Birds, there being no 
collection of any extent without examples of them. 


131. FrORISUGA MerEDoRa: (i 106s 4 6" 2 -Vol i. PL CAUIL 


Trochilus mellivorus, Linn. et auct. 

Mellisuga Surinamensis torquata, Briss. 
Surinamensis, Steph. 

Ornismya mellivora, Less. 

Topaza mellivora, Gray & Mitch. 

Florisuga mellivora, Bonap. 

Trochilus fimbriatus, Linn., Lath. 


81 


Mellisuga Cayenensis gutture nevio, Briss. 
Topaza fimbriata, Gray & Mitch. , 
*ZLampornis mellivora, Jard. Nat. Lib. Humming Birds, vol. ii. 
p- 155. 
* Florisuga mellivora, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 14; Id. Troch. 
Enum. p. 12; Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 29. 


Habitat. Brazil, Trinidad, New Granada, Bogota, and Guatemala. 


132. FLoRISUGA FLABELLIFERA, Gould . . Vol. II. Pl. CXIV. 


Trochilus ( ?) flabelliferus, Gould. 
Florisuga flabellifera, Bonap. 
* Florisuga flabellifera, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 14; Id. Troch. 
Enum. p. 12; Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein, p. 29, note. 
* Topaza flabellifera, Gray & Mitch. Gen. of Birds, vol. i. p. 110. 
Topaza, sp. 8. 
Habitat. The Island of Tobago, and perhaps elsewhere. 


«Tam not able,” says Mr. Kirk, “to decide as to this bird being 
a native of Tobago. It is only to be met with at certain seasons ; but 
whether it leaves the island, or retires to the interior, I am not at 
present prepared to say. It is seldom to be found in open sunshine: 
the mornings and evenings are its principal times for feeding, and 
its evolutions then are truly pleasing,—at one instant suspended 
immovable to the eye (although alternately showing the purest white 
and green), at the very top of our tallest bamboo, guava, or other 
tree, and at the next moment at the root, with two or three zigzags 
right and left, up and down, dipping either into the river or snapping 
a fly from the surface, and then disappearing. I think it probable 
that this bird feeds more upon winged insects than most of the 
others, which may account for its being seen so early in the calm 
mornings, retiring generally into the thick wild plantain bushes as 
soon as the sun begins to spread his rays upon them, and appearing 
again in the evening when he is going down, or when his rays cease 
to act upon their spot of pleasure. A female shot on the 19th of 
April contained an egg almost perfect.”—Hore Zoologice, by Sir 
W. Jardine, Bt. in Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist. vol. xx. p. 373. 


Poa PieIs0GA ATRA oo sone es VO DL PL eee 
’  Trochilus ater, Pr. Max. 
atratus, Licht. 
— niger, Swains. 

Jfuscus, Vieill. 

Ornismya lugubris, Less. 

Colibri leucopygius, Spix- 

Mellisuga ater, Steph. 

Topaza atra, Gray & Mitch. 

Florisuga atra, Bonap. , 
* Lampornis niger, Jard. Nat. Lib. Humming Birds, vol. ii. p. 156. 
* Florisuga fusca, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p.14; Id. Troch. Enum. 

p. 12; Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 29. 


Habitat. Eastern Brazil. 


82 


That all the Humming-Birds are not yet discovered we may very 
reasonably conjecture, and we may ask what will be our next novelty — 
in this group of birds. This remark has suggested itself upon find- 
ing next in succession the singular little Microchera albocoronata. 
Although America has been discovered for more than 300 years, and 
collectors have been employed for the last fifty in searching for its 
treasures of various kinds, we had no knowledge of the existence of 
this bird until 1852, when Dr. J. K. Merritt shot three examples in 
the district of Belen in New Granada. 


Genus Microcuera, Gould. 
(yuKpos, parvus, et yypa, vidua.) 


Generic characters. 

Male.— Bill about the same length as the head, and straight ; 
wings moderate ; ¢azé rather short and square ; ¢arsi clothed ; feet 
small; claws diminutive. 


134. MicrocHERA ALBOCORONATA, Gould. . Vol. II. Pl. CXVI. 
Mellisuga albo-coronata, Lawr. 
Habitat. The district of Belen in New Granada. 


A considerable hiatus here occurs, which cannot at present be 
filled up, and we come to the elegant frill-necked Coquettes, the 
Lophornithes ; and with these I commence the third volume. 

They are among the most beautiful of the smaller members of 
the Trochilide, and are distinguished by the possession of length- 
ened ornamental plumes springing from the sides of the neck, 
which generally have a spangle of metallic lustre at the tip; they 
are further ornamented with beautiful lengthened crests, which are 
developed to a greater extent in some species than in others: in 
those in which the neck plumes are the longest, the crests are least 
so, and vice versd. They are spread over a great part of America, 
from Mexico along the Andes to Bolivia; they also occur in Brazil, 
the Guianas, and the Island of Trinidad. 


Genus Lopuornis, Less. 
135. LopuHornis ornatus .. . . .. Vol. III. Pl. CXVIL 


Trochilus ornatus, Gmel., Lath., Shaw. 
Ornismya ornata, Less. 
Mellisuga ornata, Gray & Mitch. 
Lophornis auratus, Bonap. 
ornatus, Bonap. . 
ornata, Less., Gray, Reichenb. 


Habitat. Northern Brazil, Guiana, and Trinidad. 


Mr. W. Tucker informs me that in Trinidad this species “ fre- 
quents the pastures and open places, and visits the flowers of all the 


83 


small shrubs, but is particularly fond of those of the Ipecacuanha 
plant, and that it is very pugnacious, erecting its crest, throwing out 
its whiskers, and attacking every Humming-Bird that may pass 
within its range of vision.” 


136. LopHornis Goutpt . . . . ~- Vol. IL. Pl. CXVIII. 


Ornismya Gouldii, Less. 
Trochilus Gouldii, Jard. 
Lophornis Gouldii, Less. 
Mellisuga Gouldt, Gray § Mitch, 
Lophornis gouldi, Bonap. 
Bellatriz Gouldii, Reichenb. 


Habitat. Northern Brazil. 


137. LopHornis MaGniricus . . , . Vol. III. Pl. CXIX. 


Trochilus magnificus, Vieill., Temm., J ard., Pr. Max. zu Wied. 
—____ decorus, Licht. 
Colibri helios, Spix. 
Ornismya magnifica, Less. 
strumaria, Less. 
Lophornis strumaria, Less. ; 
Mellisuga magnifica, Gray & Mitch. 
Lophornis magnificus, Bonap. 
Bellatriz magnifica, Reichenb. 
* Ornismya strumaria, Dev. Rev. et Mag. de Zool, 1852, p. 215. 
Habitat. South-eastern Brazil. 


Mr. Deville states that this bird is found for a portion of the 
year in different Brazilian districts, and is so bold that the sight of 
man creates no alarm. Its food chiefly consists of small insects, 
which it seizes on the wing, precipitating itself from the extremity 
of a dead bough, upon which it often passes entire hours in the same 
position: when it has chosen a branch it rarely proceeds far from it, 
and always returns to it. It is very common in the environs of Rio 
de Janeiro. 


138. LopHornis ReGuyus, Gould . . a NBs Ill, FE CXX. 


Trochilus (Lophornis) regulus, Gould. 
Mellisuga regulus, Gray & Mitch. 
Lophornis regulus, Bonap. 

Habitat. Cochabamba in Bolivia. 


I possess a bird of this genus from Peru, with a more truncate 
form of crest than that of L. Regulus, the fine feathers of which are 
rather largely tipped with spangles of dark green. This may pro- 
bably prove to be, and I believe 1s, really distinct; I have conse- | 
quently proposed for it the specific name of lophotes. Insizeand | 
colouring it very closely resembles the L. Regulus, with the excep- 
tional difference in the form of the crest. 


139. LopHORNIS LOPHOTES, Gould. 
Habitat. Peru. 


84 


140. Lopnornis Denatrret, Less.. . . Vol. II. Pl. CXXI. 
Habitat. New Granada. 


141, Lopuornis Recina, Gould . . . Vol. Ill. Pl. CXXII. 


Lophornis Regine, Gould. 
Mellisuga regine, Gray & Mitch. 
Lophornis regine, Bonap. 
Bellatrix Regine, Reichenb. 
Habitat. New Granada. 


Mr. Fraser, who killed an example at Zamora, in Ecuador, states 
that the irides of this species are black, and its mandibles reddish 
flesh-colour, with a black tip ; he adds that it was feeding from a 
large Guarumba tree. 


142. LorHornis TEENS... « «+: «> VobeRie OL 4X MALL, 


Ornismya Helene, Delatt. 
Mellisuga Helene, Gray & Mitch. 
Lophornis helene, Bonap. 
helena, Bonap. 
Helene, Reichenb. 


Habitat. Guatemala and Southern Mexico. 


Mr. Salvin states that this species is not uncommon in the vicinity 
of Coban, and that its ery “is peculiarly shrill and unlike that of — 
any other species I know ; hence its presence may be noticed if only 
the cry of a passing bird be heard. It feeds among the Salvie that 
so abound in the mountain-hollows about Coban ; and it is said also 
to show a partiality for the flowers of the Tasisco when that tree is in 
full bloom, in the month of December. In the month of November 
females of this species are very rare. Of the specimens I collected, 
there was only one female to seventeen males. 

“In the Indian language of Coban, Lophornis Helene has, besides 
the name ‘ Tzunnun,’ which is applied to all the small Humming- 
Birds, the additional name of ‘ Achshukub.’ The Spanish name is 
‘ El Gorrion Cachudo’—the Horned Humming-Bird.”—TIéis, vol. ii. 
p- 268. 


Although I have placed all the species known by the trivial name of 
Coquettes in the genus Lophornis, the L. chalybeus and L. Verreauzi 
have been separated by M. Cabanis into a distinct genus, under the 
name of Polemistria. 


Genus Potemistria, Cab. 


These birds, as will be seen on reference te the plates on which 
they are represented, vary considerably from all the true Lophor- 
nithes ; the feathers of the neck-frill are very different, and the tail 
is much longer and more rounded. I shall not be surprised if an- 
other species of this peculiar form should be discovered ; for I have 
in my possession the skin of a female from Bogota, which I am inclined 
to think is the female of an unknown species. 


85 


143. PoLEMISTRIA CHALYBEA. 
Lophornis chalybeus . . + + + © Vol. III. Pl. CX XIV. 


Trochilus chalybeus, Vieill., Temm., Jard. 
festivus, Licht. 
Ornismya Vieillottii, Less. 
Mellisuga chalybea, Gray & Mitch. 
: Lophornis chalybeus, Bonap. 
Ornismya Audenetii, Less. 
Trochilus Audenetu, Jard. 
Colibri mystax, Spix. 
Mellisuga Audenetii, Gray & Mitch. 
Lophornis Audeneti, Bonap. 


Habitat. Brazil. 


144, PoLeMisTRIA VERREAUXI. i 
Lophornis Verreauxi . . . . . « Vol. IIT. Pl. CXXV. HH 


Trochilus Verreauzi, Boure. 
Lophornis Verreauxi, Reichenb. 
Bellatriz verreauai, Bonap. 


Habitat. Peru. 


I shall now proceed to the single species of the genus Discura. 
The band which crosses the lower part of the back allies this bird to 
the Lophornithes on the one hand, and to Prymnacantha and the 
Gouldie on the other. ; 


Genus Discura, Bonap. 
145. DiscuRA LONGICAUDA ~ oy a aa CALS hs EY I. 


Trochilus longicaudus, Gmel. 

Mellisuga longicauda, Gray & Mitch. 

Discosura longicauda, Bonap. 

Discura longicauda, Bonap., Reichenb. 

Trochilus platurus, Lath., Vieill., Drapiez, Pr. Max. zu Wied. 
Ornismya platura, Less. 

Mellisuga platura, Steph. 

Trochilus (Ocreatus) ligonicaudus, Gould. 

| ; Discosura ligonicauda, Bonap. 

Discura platura, Reichenb. 


Habitat. Cayenne, Brazil, and Demerara. 


Gouldia, Popelairia, Gouldomyia and Prymnacantha, are all ge- 
neric terms proposed for the four species I have called by the trivial 
name of Thorn-tail. Of these Bonaparte’s name of Gouldia, having 
the priority, has been adopted by me in the body of this work ; but 
as the first species G. Popelairi differs from the others In possess- 
ing a most singular and elegant crest terminating in two hair-like 
feathers, I propose to adopt M. Cabanis’s classical name of Prymna- 
cantha for this species, and to retain Gouldia for the others. 


86 


Genus PrymMNacantHa, Cab. 


146. Prymnacantua PorEeLAtREl. 
Gouldia Popelairi «.d-i..0> . s.. VolLIDG- Pl, OXXYII. 
Trochilus Popelairii, Dubus. 
Mellisuga Popelairii, Gray & Mitch. 
Gouldia popelairt, Bonap. 
Habitat. New Granada. 


Genus Gouxp1a, Bonap. 


147. Goutp1a Lancsporrrir . . . Vol. III. Pl. CXXVIII. 


Trochilus Langsdorfi, Vieill., Temm., Valenc., Less. 
Ornismya Langsdorfi, Less. 

Colibri hirundinaceus, Spix. 

Mellisuga Langsdorfii, Gray & Mitch. 

Gouldia langsdorffi, Bonap. 


Habitat. Brazil; and I have a single specimen from the Rio Napo. 


148. Goutpia Converst . . . ... Vol. IDL. Pl: OXXIX, 
Trochilus Conversii, Boure. 
Mellisuga Conversii, Gray & Mitch. 
Gouldia conversi, Bonap. 


Habitat. From Bogota along the Andes to Popayan; and Ecuador, 
from which latter country I have a single specimen. 


149. Goutpia Laritim . . . . . . Vol. IIL. Pl. CXXX. 
Trochilus Letitie, Bource. 
Gouldia letitia, Bonap. 
Laetitia, Reichenb. 
Habitat. Bolivia. 


Genus Trocai.us, Linn. 


The members of this genus as now restricted are only two in num- 
ber—T. colubris and T. Alexandri. Both these birds are of moderate 
size and of elegant proportions. The males are decorated with richly- 
coloured gorgets, while the females are clothed in a sombre livery. 


150. TRocuitus cotusris, Linn. . . Vol. III. Pl. CXXXI. 
Trochilus colubris, Linn. et auct. 
Mellisuga Carolinensis gutture rubro, Briss. 
colubris, Steph., Gray & Mitch. 
Ornismya colubris, Less. 
*Cynanthus colubris, Jard. Nat. Lib. Humming-Birds, vol. ii. p- 143. 
Habitat. The eastern part of North America in summer; Mexico 
and Guatemala in winter, at which season it is also occasionally 
found in Cuba, and sometimes in Bermuda. 


T have observed that specimens from Guatemala are smaller 
and lighter-coloured than those obtained in North America. In 


87 


all probability these constitute a race which does not migrate so far 
north as the United States. It is probable, also, that the birds 
frequenting the latter country do not go further south than Mexico. 

«This species,” say Messrs. Sclater and Salvin, ‘would appear to 
be abundant in the winter months in Guatemala, as numerous ex- 
amples were obtained by Mr. Skinner. It occurs at Acatenango, a 
village on the southern slope of the great Cordillera, showing that it 
chooses for its winter retreat the moderate climate afforded by the 
region lying between the elevations of 3000 and 4000 feet.”’—Jdis, 
vol. i. 1859, p. 129. 


151. Trocuitus ALEXANDRI, Boure. et Muls. 
: Vol. IIL. Pl. CXXXII. 
Trochilus Alecandri, Bourc. et Muls., Cassin. 
Mellisuga Alexandri, Gray & Mitch. 
Archilochus Alexandri, Reichenb. 
Trochilus Alexandri, Bonap. 
*Trochilus Cassini, Bonap. MSS. 
*______ Suecicus, in Mus. Gétzian. Dresden. 
* Selasphorus Alexandri, Reich. Troch. Enum. p. 10. 
Habitat. Northern Mexico and California. Found by Dr. Heer- 
mann at Sacramento city, within the limits of the United States. 


Genus Mexuisuea, Briss. 


This genus contains but a single species, unless the very minute 
Humming-Bird in the Loddigesian Collection should prove to be 
really distinct. The member or members of the genus, as the case 
may be, must be regarded as the very smallest of the Trochilide. 
Both sexes are destitute of luminous colouring. 


152. MELLISUGA MINIMA. . . « + Vol. III. Pl. CXXXIII. 


Trochilus minimus, Linn. et auct. 

Polytmus minimus variegatus, Brown. 

Trochilus minutulus, Vieill. 

Mellisuga Dominicensis, Briss. 

Trochilus Vieilloti, Shaw. 

Mellisuga Vieilloti, Steph. 

Ornismya minima, Less. 

Mellisuga humilis, Gosse. 

Trochilus Catharine, Sallé. 

Hylocharis nigra, Gray & Mitch. 

Mellisuga minima, Bonap. 

Trochilus niger, Gmel., Lath., &e. 
*____ pygmaeus, Swains. Birds of Brazil, pl. 7s. 


Habitat. Jamaica and St. Domingo. 
Genus CaLyere, Gould. 
(Kakurri, operta). 


Generic characters. 
Male.—Bill longer than the head, straight, or slightly arched ; 


88 


éail rather short, the three outer feathers stiff, narrow, and slightly 
incurved ; éarsi clothed ; feet small ; hind and fore toes nearly equal 
in length ; entire head and throat luminous. 

Female.—Destitute of luminous colouring. 

This is strictly a Mexican genus, all the members of which are 
beautifully coloured, the entire head and face of the males appear- 
ing as if covered with a mask of burnished metal. 


Loo, CALYETH COSTS 4 .: .. + « . Vol. dil, PL CXXXIV. 


Ornismya Coste, Bourc., Longuem. & Parz. 
Melhisuga Coste, Gray & Mitch. 
Selasphorus Coste, Bonap. 

Atthis Coste, Reichenb. 

Trochilus Coste, Reichenb. 


Habitat. Mexico, Southern California, and Colorado Basin. 


154, Canyere ANNA -2 3-5. °°) Wok TEE PR GORRXV. 


Ornismya Anna, Less. 

Trochilus Anna, Jard. 

Mellisuga Anna, Gray & Mitch. 

Selasphorus anna, Bonap. 

Calliphlox anna, Gambel. 

Atthis Anna, Reichenb. 

Trochilus icterocephalus, Nuttall. 

*Calliphlow lamprocephalus, Licht. Cat. of Birds in Mus. of Berlin, 
ee 

Habitat, The table lands of Mexico and California. 


155. Catypre Henenam . . . >. . Vol. Ill. Pt. CXXXVI. 


Orthoriynchus Helene, Lambeye. 
Boothi, Gundl. 


Habitat. Cuba. 


Genus SeLaspHorvs, Swains. 


The species of this form are characterized by the great brilliancy 
of the gorgets of the males. The females are destitute of these fine 
colours. The rounded or cuneate form of the tail in these birds at once 
separates them from the members of the last-mentioned genus. 


156. SELAspHoRUs RUFUS . . . . Vol. III. Pl. CXXXVII. 
Trochilus rufus, Gmel. et auct. 
collaris, Lath. 
———— WSitkensis, Rathke. 
Ornismya Sasin, Less. 
Trochilus (Selasphorus) rufus, Swains. & Rich. 
Selasphorus rufus, Audub. 
Mellisuga rubra, Gray & Mitch. 
Selasphorus ruber, Bonap. 
Calliphlox rufa, Gambel. 


89 


%Selasphorus ruber, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 56. 
Habitat. Mexico. In summer it also occurs in California, and 

even as far north as Nootka Sound, and sometimes at Sitka. 
Refer to the account of this species for my remarks respecting its 
not being identical with the Trochilus ruber of Linnzeus ; and also to 

a very interesting paper in the ‘Natural History of Washington- 

territory,’ by Drs. Cooper and Suckley. 

157. SELASPHORUS SCINTILLA, Gould. Vol. III. Pl. CXXXVIII. 
Trochilus (Selasphorus) scintilla, Gould. 

Habitat. The inner sides of the voleanic mountain Chiriqui in 
Costa Rica. 

158. SeuaAspHorus Froresir . . . Vol. If. Pl, CKXXIX. 
Trochilus Floresii, Lodd. MSS. i . 
Habitat. Bolanos in Central Mexico. ie 

159. SeLASpHoRUS PLATYcERCUS. . . . Vol. III. Pl. CXL. 


Trochilus platycercus, Swains. 

Ornismya tricolor, Less. 

montana, Less. 

Mellisuga platycerca, Gray & Mitch. 

Selasphorus platycercus, Bonap. 

*Trochilus montanus, Swains. Birds of Brazil, pl. 74. 


Habitat. Guatemala, Mexico, and, according to Dr. Baird, “through i 
Rocky Mountains to Fort Bridger, Utah.” 


I have observed that specimens from Guatemala are much smaller | ni 
than those from the table lands of Mexico. M. Boucard found this — ae 
bird at Oaxaca in Southern Mexico, and Mr. Salvin at Duefias in © | | 
Guatemala. 


Genus Arruis, Reichenb. 


The type of this genus is 4. Heloise; and I retain the term 
for this very singular and beautiful bird, which in the character of 


its plumage and the colouring of its tail differs from every other with 
which I am acquainted. The plumage is extremely soft, and easily 
| disarranged. 


160. Arruis HELoIsz. 
Selasphorus Heloise . - - + + - + Vol. III. Pl. CXLI. 
Ornismya Heloisa, Less. & Delatt. 
. Mellisuga Heloisa, Gray & Mitch. 
| Tryphena heloisa, Bonap. 
Habitat. Central America and Southern Mexico. 


« Two birds were given to me,” says Mr. Salvin, ‘* by Don Vicente 
Constancia, who had received them from a place called Chimachoyo, 
near Calderas, in the Volcan de Fuego; and two other specimens I 
have in my collection were shot in the tierra caliente north of Co- 


¢ 


90 


ban. Hence it would appear that this, like many other species of 
Humming-Birds, is found in very different climates.” — Ibis, ii. 
p. 266. 


Numerously subdivided as the members of this family already are, 
I cannot pass over the beautiful Calliope without perceiving the ne- 
cessity for a separate distinctive appellation; I therefore propose 
that of Stedlula. 
Genus STELLuLA, Gould. 


(dim. of S¢ella.) 

Generic characters. 

Male.—Bill longer than the head, straight and pointed ; wings 
moderately long and. sickle-shaped ; first primary rigid ; tail short 
and truncate ; feet small; claws diminutive and curved. 

The starry throat-mark of this bird would appear to indicate that 
it should be associated with the members of the next genus, Calo- 
thorax ; but on an examination of the tail we find it to be short and 
truncate, and that consequently the bird is of a very different form. 

At present but one species of this form has been discovered; and 
this ranges very far north, not only over the high lands of Mexico, 
but even enters California, as is shown by specimens having been 
sent to me from thence by Dr. Baird of Washington, and Mr. Bridges 
of California. 


161. SreLLuLa CALLIOPE. 


Calothorax Calliope, Gould. . . . . Vol. IIL. Pl. CXLII. 


Trochilus (Calothorax) Calliope, Gould. 
Calothoraz caltiope, Gray & Mitch., Bonap., Reichenb. 


Habitat. The table lands of Northern Mexico and California. 
The type of the 


Genus Catornorax, G. R. Gray, 


is the well-known Mexican Star, C. cyanopogon, which, together 
with the new species discovered by M. Sallé, and named by me C. 
pulchra, are all that are known of this peculiar form. Both these 
birds are natives of Mexico—one inhabiting the table lands, the other 
the more southern and hotter districts. Both have very singularly 
formed tails—the outer feather being shorter than the next, and the 
four central ones so abbreviated as to be almost hidden by the 
coverts. When the males display their luminous gorgets, they must 
appear truly beautiful. The females possess none of this fine colour- 
ing, but, on the contrary, are very plainly attired. 


162, CanorHorax cyanopocon . . . Vol. III. Pl. OXLIII. 
Cynanthus Lucifer, Swains. ; 
Ornismya cyanopogon, Less. 

Calothorax lucifer, Gray & Mitch. 
Lrochilus cyanopogon, Jard. 
~ lucifer, Jard. 


91 


Lucifer cyanopogon, Reichenb. 

Trochilus simplex, Less. ae 

s cyanopogon, Swains. Birds of Brazil, pl. 77. 

ss coruscus, Licht. Preis-Verz. Mexican. Thier. v. Deppe 
& Schiede (Sept. 1830) No. 34, 35. 


Habitat. The table land of Northern Mexico. 


163. CaLoTHoRAX PULCHRA, Gould . . Vol. III. PI. CXLIV. 
Habitat. Oaxaca in Southern Mexico. 


It has always appeared to me that the well-known Calothorax 
Mulsanti and C. Heliodori might very properly be separated into a 
distinct genus ; and this I have accordingly done. With these must 
be associated the species to which I have given the name of C. deco- 
ratus, and, I think, the singular little C. micrurus. They are all from 
the Andes, and are among the most diminutive of the Trochilide. 
Their structure would lead one to suspect that their wings are capable 
of very rapid motion, that organ being so small that it must be moved 
with increased rapidity to enable the bird to sustain itself when poising 
before a flower. 


Genus AcrstruRA, Gould. 
axéorpa, acts, et ovpa, cauda. 


Generic characters. et 

Male.— Bill longer than the head, cylindrical, and very slightly 
arched ; two centre tail-feathers extremely small, the two outer ones 
filamentous and shorter than the third; wings diminutive ; tarsi 
clothed ; feet small; gorget luminous. 

Female-——Unadorned. 


164. AcestruRA MULSANTI. 
Calothorax Mulsanti . . . «© . . « Vol. III. Pl. CXLV. 


Ornismya Mulsanti, Boure. 
Mellisuga Mulsanti, Gray & Mitch. 
Calothoraz Mulsanti, Bonap. 
*Lucifer Mulsanti, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 10. 
*Trochilus filicaudus, Licht. in Mus. Berol. 
*Chaetocercus Mulsanti, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 60. 


Habitat. The temperate regions of the Andes, from Bogota to 
Quito. 
I observe that specimens from the former locality are smaller than 


those from the latter. : i 
Mr. Fraser found this bird at Pallatanga and Puellaro in Ecuador, 


165. ACESTRURA DECORATA, Gould, : st hy 
Calothorax decoratus, Gould . - + - Vol IL. Pl. CXLVL 
Habitat. Uncertain, but supposed to be Antioquia, in New 

Granada. GE TiS Se otEsa 5 


92 


166. Acrestrura Hextoport. . 
Calothorax Heliodori . . . . . . Volz III. Pl. CXLVII. 


Ornismya Heliodori, Boure. : 

Mellisuga Heliodori, Gray & Mitch. 

Calothorax Heliodori, Bonap. 
* Lucifer Heliodori, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 10. 
*Chaetocercus Heliodort, Cab. et Hein, Mus. Hein, Theil iii, p. 60. 
*Calothorax bombilus, Reichenb. MS. 


Habitat. The Andes of New Granada. 


167, ACESTRURA MicRURA, Gould. 
Calothorax micrurus, Gould. . . . Vol. III. Pl. CXLVIII. 
Habitat. Peru or Bolivia. 


The members of the genus Acestrura naturally lead on to the 
Calothorax Rose and C. Jourdani constituting the 


Genus Cumrtocercus, G. R. Gray. 


Both these birds have very singularly formed tails, as may be seen 
on reference to the respective plates on which they are represented. 


168. CuztTocercus Rosa. 
Calothorax Rost -s-5, i. 5 --« a Web Pl, CXLIX. 
Trochilus Rose, Boure. & Muls. 

Mellisuga rose, Gray & Mitch. 
Calothorax Rosae, Reichenb. 


— rosa, Bonap. 
*Chaetocercus Rosae, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p- 60. 


Habitat. Venezuela. 


169. CHarTrocercus JouRDANI. 
Cuethorax courdant ...< -o . noc oc. ¥ol. Ii. PLC. 


Ornismya Jourdani, Boure. 
Jordani, Boure. 
Melhisuga Jourdani, Gray & Mitch. 
Calothorax jourdani, Bonap. 
-—— Jourdani, Reich. 
Callothorax jourdani, Bonap. 
Chetocercus Jourdani, Gray. 


Habitat. The Island of Trinidad, where Mr. Tucker states that it 
frequents the Savannahs, but is very rare. 


The bird which I have figured under the name of Calothorax 
Fanny is the type of the 


Genus Myrtis, Reichend., 
which I adopt for that beautiful bird and the C. FY arrelli, as I con- 


93 


sider them to be a very distinct form, and one which is especially re- 
markable for the structure of the tail. 


170. Myrtis Fanni&. oe 
Calothorax Fanny... + ~¢-+00* + Vol. IJ. Pl. CLI. 


Ornismya Fanny, Less. 
Trochilus Labrador, Boure. 
Calothorax Fanny, Gray & Mitch. 
Thaumastura fanny, Bonap. 
Lucifer labrador, Bonap. 
Labrador, Reichenb. — 
Myrtis Fanny, Reich. 
Habitat. Ecuador and Peru. 
Mr. Fraser found it at Cuenca in November 1857, when it was 
“common about the gardens and lane hedgerows. It makes much 


more humming with its wings than the long-tailed green Lesbia.”— 
Proce. Zool. Soc. part xxvi. p. 499. 


171. Myrris YARRELLI. 
Calothorax Yarrelli. ©. - 2 6 2 toe Vol. IIL. Pl. CLIT. 


Trochilus Yarrelli, Bourc. 
Habitat. Western Peru, particularly the neighbourhood of Arica. 


How very singular and diversified in form are the Humming-Birds 
of Peru! So varied indeed are they that almost every species demands 
a generic appellation ; the T’. Core with its beautiful throat and length- 
ened tail is the type of the 


Genus TuaumasturRA, Bonap. 


Of this peculiar form only one species is known, of which the male 
alone is decorated with fine colours, and bears the singularly con- 
structed tail. 


172. TaaumastuRACoRmH. . . . = - Vol. II. Pl. CLIII. 


Ornismya Cora, Less. 

Calothorax cora, Gray & Mitch. 

Trochilus Cora, Jard. 

Thaumastura cora, Bonap. . 
*Ornismya cora, Dev. Rev. et Mag. de Zool. 1852, p. 21 ys 


Habitat. Peru. 


M. Deville states that this bird is found during the months of 
February, March, April, and May only, in the humid districts bor- 
dering the River Rime at Lima. it is seen in small troops com- 
posed of six or eight couples, which are constantly pursuing one 
another, and uttering a slight cry. It is very airy in its flight, and 
rarely permits any other Humming-Bird to remain in its neighbour- 
hood, but wages a continual and terrible war with them. 


The largest species of the luminous lilac-throated Peruvian 
H 


94 


Humming-Birds, the Vespera, constitutes the 


Genus Ruoports, Reichenb., 


which, as the form differs from all the others, I have no other alter- 
native, if I act with consistency, than to adopt. It has a deeply 
forked tail, the feathers of which are narrow and rigid, not soft and 
yielding as in the 7. Core. I have never seen a second species of this 
particular form. The female, like that sex in many other allied 
genera, is destitute of brilliant colouring. 


173. RHODOPHIS VESPERA .. ., «ect VOL bike DeCaa 


Ornismya vesper, Less. 

Trochilus vesper, Jard. 
Calothorax vesper, Gray & Mitch 
Thaumastura vesper, Bonap. 
Lucifer vesper, Bonap. 

Rhodopis vespera, Reichenb. 
Calliphlox vespera, Reichenb. - 


Habitat. Peru. 


Not less beautiful in the colouring of their gorgets are the mem- 
bers of the 
Genus Doricna, Reichenb. 


The Eliza, the Guatemalan bird known as enicura, and the less- 
known Bahama species Evelyne, are all associated by me in this 
genus; and if the Plates on which they are respectively figured be 
referred to, it will be seen how beautiful are the throat-markings of 
the males. 


174. Doricua Exviz@. 
Thaumastura Elizeé?*s: . 2. 2...) .).) Vol. ITT. Pl. GLY. 


Trochilus Eliza, Less. 
Myrtis Elisa, Reichenb. 
Lucifer elisa, Bonap. 
Calothorax Eliza, Gray & Mitch. 
*Thaumastura Eliza, Montes de Oca in Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. 
Philad. 1860, p. 552. 


Habitat. Southern Mexico. 


“This,” says M. Montes de Oca, “is one of the rarest of the 
Mexican Humming-Birds. It is small, very beautiful, and flies with 
wonderful rapidity, moving its wings with such velocity that it is 
almost impossible to see them; and it might easily be mistaken for 
a large bee, from the buzzing sound produced by their incessant 
motion. In the vicinity of Jalapa it is called Mirto de Colo de 
tisera, or the spear-tailed Myrtle-sucker. It is very shy, and differs 
in its habits and manners from all other species. It is on the wing 
very early in the morning; and I have never seen any of the few 
specimens that have come under my observation between the hours 
of seven or eight o’clock a.m and five p.m., when they are again to 


95 ‘* 


be met with until dusk. When it has once been detected feeding at 
any patticular spot, it is almost sure to be found there at the same 
hour for several days in succession. It feeds on the Masapan and To- 
baco flowers, preferring, I think, the latter. It is also found and 
breeds at the Barrancas de Jico (or the Precipices of Jico), about 
twenty miles from Jalapa. The nest, which is very small, round, 
flat at the bottom, and neither so deep nor so thick at the base as 
those of most Humming-Birds, is covered on the outside with moss 
from stones, and lined with ¢wle, or cattail silky floss.” 


175. DoricHa EVELYNE. . 
Thaumastura Evelyne . . . . . ~ Vol. III. Pl. CLVI. 


Trochilus Evelyne, Bourc. 
Calothorax Evelyne, Gray & Mitch. 
Eveline, Reichenb. 
Callothoraz evillina, Bonap. 
Trochilus Bahamensis, Bryant. 


Habitat. Bahama Islands. 


176. DorrcHa ENICURA. 
Thaumastura enicura . . . - - « = Vol. If. Pl. CLVII. 


Trochilus enicurus. Vieill., Temm., Jard. 
Ornismya heteropygia, Less. 

Trochilus Swainsonii, Less. 

Calothorax enicurus, Bonap. 


Habitat. Guatemala. 


«< On no occasion,” says Mr. Salvin, “ were the males of this species 
observed about Duefias during the months of February and March ; 
indeed it was not until the month of May that both males and females 
were seen together, at which time the Nopal of the cochineal planta- 
tions being in full flower, great numbers of Humming-Birds, espe- 
cially of this species, were in the habit of feeding from the blossoms 
of that cactus. The females during the winter months are common 
enough, and frequent the same places, and feed principally on the 
same trees as the Cyanomyia cyanocephala.”’—Ibis, vol.i. p. 129. 

“‘ Occasionally, when flying, the elongated tail-feathers are stretched 
to a considerable angle.” —Jdvs, vol. ii. p. 40. 

Speaking of three nests of this species Mr. Salvin says :-—* One of 
these was in a coffee-tree, and had two eggs. . The other was most 
curiously placed in the cup-shaped top of a fruit of the Nopal (Cactus 
cochinellifer), the fastenings being dexterously wound round the 
clustering prickles, and thus retaining the whole structure most firmly 
in its place. This nest was remarkably shaliow ; so much so that, 
if it had not contained its two eggs, I should have pronounced. it far 
from complete. It may be that, being based on a firm foundation 
(one not nearly so liable to oscillation by the wind) the bird had 
found that a greater depth was not necessary to keep the eggs from 
falling out. Had she placed her nest on a slender twig, as seems to 

H2 


96 


be usual, the case might have been different. The third nest had 
young. It was placed in the upper shoots of a Dahlia at the fur- 
ther end of the court-yard. The hen seemed to have the entire duty 
of rearing the young ; for I never once saw the male near the place ; 
in fact, I never saw a male inside the court-yard. When sitting she 
would sometimes allow me to go close to her, and even hold the 
branch still when it was swaying to and fro by the wind, without 
evincing the slightest alarm. But it was only when a hot sun was 
shining that she would allow me to do this ; when it was dull or rain- 
ing four or five yards was the nearest I could approach. Frequently 
when I had disturbed her, I would sit down close at hand and wait 
for her return, and I always noticed that, after flying past once or 
twice overhead, she would bring a small piece of lichen, which, after 
she had settled herself comfortably in her nest, she would attach to 
the outside. All this was done with such a confident and fearless 
air, that she seemed to intimate, ‘I left my nest purely to seek for 
this piece of lichen, and not because I was afraid of you.” When 
sitting upon her nest, the whole cavity was quite filled by her puffed- 
out feathers, the wings, with the exception of their tips, being en- 
tirely concealed by the feathers of the back. When the young were 
first hatched, they looked little, black, shapeless things, with long 
necks and hardly any beak. They soon, however, grew, and entirely 
filled the nest. I never saw the old bird sitting after the young had 
emerged from the eggs: she seemed to leave them alike in sun and 
rain. When feeding them she would stand upon the edge of the 
nest with her body very upright. The first of these young ones 
flew on October 15. It was standing on the side of the nest as I 
happened to approach, when it immediately flew off, but fell among 
the flowers below. I placed it in the nest, but a moment after it was 
off again, nothing daunted by its first failure—this second time with 
better success, for it flew over a wall close by and settled on a tree 
on the other side. In the evening I saw the old one feeding it, and 
went up to the tree; but it started off with increased vigour to an 
orange-tree, and tried at first to rest on one of the fruit, but failing, 
found a more appropriate perch on the edge of a leaf. I never saw 
it afterwards. The other young one flew two days later. 

“The seeds of the willow and bulrush are favourite materials for 
the interior structure of the nest, while lichen is freely used outside.”’ 
—Ibis, vol. ii. p. 264. 


Genus TrypHana, Gould. 
(Tpvgarva, nom. prop.) 
Generic characters. 

- Male.—Bill as long as the head, and straight ; wengs very small ; 
primaries narrow ; tail deeply forked, the outer feather narrow, 
tapering at the tip and incurved ; feet small, claws short and hooked ; 
gorget richly coloured but not luminous ; tail ornamented. 

Female.—Unadorned ; tail extremely short. 
The single species of this genus stands quite alone in the great 


oF 


family of Humming-Birds. The peculiar and beautiful markings of 
its tail are most remarkable ; the colouring of the throat-mark is 
equally distinct. It must be remembered that these features are con- 
fined to the male, the female being very plainly attired, and having 
a very diminutive tail. Guatemala may well be proud of this sin- 
gular bird, rich as her fauna really is. 


177. Trypumna DUPONTI. ..- «+ - Vol. IIL. Pl. CLVIII. 


Ornismya Duponti, Less., Jard. 
Zémes, Less. 
celestis, Less. 

Mellisuga Duponti, Gray & Mitch. 

— Duponti, Jard. Nat. Lib. Humming-Birds, vol. i. p. 131. 
pl. 26. 

*Cynanthus Duponti, Tb. vol.ii. p. 145. 

*Trochilus lepidus, Licht. in Mus. Berol. 

*Tilmatura lepida, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 8; Ib. Troch. Enum. 
p. 5. pl. 711. figs. 4610, 4611. 

*Thaumastura Duponti, Bonap. in Rev. et Mag. de Zool. 1854, 
p- 297. 

me Duponti, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 55, 
note. 

Habitat. Guatemala. 

“San Gerdnimo, December 10. Don Vicente Constancia assures 
me that this species is found near the city of Guatemala; otherwise 
this is the only locality I have been able to discover, as yet, where it 
occurs. 

« Following the course of the river of San Gerdnimo up its bed to 
about half a league from the village, you come upon a small patch 
of forest with here and there open spots covered with Salve. Here 
it was that this bird was shot by a boy, who told me there were 
plenty ; however on visiting the place soon after, I was not suceess- 
ful in obtaining more specimens, nor was I fortunate enough to see 
one.” —Salvin in Ibis, vol. ii. p. 266. . 


Genus CaLuipHiox, Boié. 


Perhaps the very commonest of the frill-necked Humming-Birds 
is the C. amethystina. It is more widely spread than many other spe- 
cies, since it inhabits all the countries from Brazil to Venezuela. 


In this genus I have also placed the C. Mitchelli ; but I have some 
doubt as to the propriety of so doing. The throats of the two birds, 
although beautifully coloured, are not luminous. 


178. CALLIPHLOX AMETHYSTINA - + * Vol: TIT. Pi. CLIX. 


Trochilus amethystinus, Gmel., Lath., Vieill., P. Max. zu Wied, 


Shaw, Jard. 
Ornismya amethystina, Less. 
orthura, Less. ? 


ore gepitennenugneinntresrat er 


98 


Meilisuga amethystina, Steph., Gray & Mitch. 

Trochilus campestris, Pr. Max. zu Wied. 

Tryphena amethystinus, Bonap. 

— amethystina, Bonap. 

Calliphlox amethystina, Reichenb. 

Amethystine Humming- Bird, Lath., Shaw. 

Tryphena amethystina, Gould. 
*Trochilus brevicaudus, Spix, Av. Bras. tom. i. p- 79. tab. 
# — orthurus, Jard. Nat. Lib. Humming-Birds, vol. ii. p. 60. 

ple Bt 

*Cynanthus amethystinus, Ib. vol. ii. p. 143. 
4 * orthura, Ib. vol. ii. p. 143. ? 


Habitat. Brazil, Demerara, Cayenne, and Trinidad. 


Whether the Ornismya orthura of Lesson be a species or an old 
female of C. amethystina requires further investigation. Wherever 
the O. amethystina is found in Brazil, Trinidad, or Demerara, the 
O. orthura is found in its company—a fact which militates against its 
being a distinct species. 


179. CALLIPHLOX AMETHYSTOIDES, Less. 


Ornismya Amethystoides, Less. 
Mellisuga Amethystoides, Gray & Mitch. 
*Trochilus amethystoides, Jard. Nat. Lib. Humming-Birds, vol. ii. 
p. 62. 
*Cynanthus amethystoides, Ib. vol. ii. p. 143. 
*Calliphlox amethystoides, Bonap. Consp. Gen. Av. p. 84. 


Habitat. Minas Geraes in Brazil. 


In my account of C. Amethystina I have regarded this species as 
identical with that bird; but M. Bourcier is still of opinion that it 
is distinct; and as I find that it is of smaller size, and the tint of 
the gorget is somewhat different, I defer to his opinion. It will not, 
however, be necessary to give a separate figure of it. Specimens from 
Minas Geraes are certainly more diminutive than from elsewhere. 


180. Cauurpntox? Mircuennr . . . . Vol. III. pl. CLX. 


Trochilus Mitchelli, Bourc. 
Mellisuga Mitchelli, Gray & Mitch. 
Calothorax Mitchelli, Reichenb. 
Tryphena mitchelli, Bonap. 


Habitat. Southern parts of New Grenada and Ecuador. 


I have now gone through the species of Humming-Birds distin- 
guished for their diminutive size, the delicacy of their structure, and 
for their luminous gorgets. It is true that many other groups have 
their throats similarly adorned, such as the members of the g nera 
Oreotrochilus, Heliangelus, &c. ; but these birds are all of large size 
and of very different form, and as we proceed I think it will be seen 
that they are better placed hereafter. . I proceed next, then, with the 
racquet-tailed species—the Spathure, &c. I admit that there 


85 


is nu direct alliance between these and the former, but it wiil be re- 
collected that I have stated that the Humming-Birds cannot be ar- 
ranged in anything like a series of affinities. Here, then, we com- 
mence with a very different group ; remarkable for the peculiar 
character of the tail in most of its members. Among these I place 
in the foremost rank the extraordinary bird bearing the specific name 
mirabilis. As any description, however accurate, must fail to give a 
correct idea of this singular species, I must refer my readers to the 
Plate, upon which it is correctly depicted. 


Genus LoppicxEsia, Gould. 
(Loddiges, nom. prop.) 
Male.—Bill straight and longer than the head ; wings diminutive ; 
primaries rounded at the tip ; outer tail-feather on each side very 


much prolonged, and terminating in a large spatule. 
Female.—Unknown. 


181. Loppi1gEsiA mrraBitis, Gould . . Vol. Ill. Pl. CLXI. 


Trochilus mirabilus, Lodd. MS., Boure. 
Loddigesiornis mirabilis, Bonap. 


Habitat. Chachapoyas in Peru. 


The racquet-tailed birds I have figured under the generic name of 
Spathura are spread over the temperate regions of the great Andean 
range of mountains from the northern parts of New Granada to 
Bolivia. Much confusion prevails with respect to the generic ap- 
pellation of these birds. The case stands thus: in 1846 I proposed 
the term Ocreatus for the rufocaligatus, and in 1850 substituted. 
that of Spathura; while in 1849 Dr. Reichenbach employed that 
of Steganurus, which he changed in 1853 to Steganura. In the 
body of this work all the species are arranged under my own generic 
name, which I hope may be allowed to stand. 


Genus Sparuura, Gould. 
(Sra6n, spatha, et obpd, cauda.) 


Generic characters. 
Male.—Bill straight and rather longer than the head ; wings mo- 
“derately long and somewhat rounded ; ¢ai/ deeply forked ; the outer 
tail-feather on each side terminating in aspatule; feet small; tarsi 
thickly clothed ; hind toe and nail shorter than the middle toe and 
nail; ¢hroat luminous. 
Female.—Unadorned and destitute of spatules. 


182. SparHurA UNDERWOODI - + «+ » Vol. IL[. Pl. CLXIT. 


Ornismya Underwoodi, Less. 
Trochilus Underwoodi, Jard. 
Trochilus ventilabrum, Lath. 
Mellisuga Underwoodi, Gray & Mitch. 


100 


*Ornismya Kieneri, Less. Les Troch. p. 165, pl. 65, female. 
*Cynanthus Underwoodi, Jard. Nat. Lib. Humming Birds, vol. ii. 
. 144. 
stot Kienerii, Ib. p. 146. 
*Steganura_ spatuligera, Reich. Aufz. der Col. pp. 8 & 24; Id. 
Troch. Enum. p. 5. pl. 708. figs. 4598-600. 
*________. Underwoodi, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p- 66. 
*Steganura remigera, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. pp. 8, 24; Id. 
Troch. Enum. p. 5, pl. 708, figs. 4601-2. 
*Steganurus remigera, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 67. 
Habitat. The neighbourhood of Bogota, on the Andes, and the 
hilly portion of eastern Venezuela. 
In his ‘ Trochilinarum Enumeratio’ Dr. Reichenbach has figured 
a white-booted Racquet-tail under the name of Steganura remigera, 
which, after a careful examination of the type specimen, I have no 


doubt is identical with this species, I have therefore placed that name 
among its synonyms. 


183. SPATHURA MELANANTHERA, Jard.. Vol. III. Pl. CLXIII. 


Trochilus (Spathura) melananthera, Jard. 
Steganura melananthera, Reichenb. 
Discura melananthera, Bonap. 


Habitat. Ecuador. 


Mr. Fraser, who procured specimens of S. melananthera at Pal- 
latanga and Nanegal in Ecuador, states that its feet are “ white.” 


184, Sparnursa Peruana, Gould . . . Vol. III. Pl. CLXIV. 
Habitat. Moyobamba in Peru. 


185. SPATHURA RUFOCALIGATA, Gould . Vol. III. Pl. CLXV. 


Trochilus (Ocreatus) rufocaligatus, Gould. 
Adde, Boure. 
Mellisuga rufocaligata, Gray & Mitch. 


Habitat. La Paz in Bolivia. 


The Trochilus Adde of M. Bourcier is considered to be identical 
either with the S. Peruana or the present bird ; in all probability it 
was applied to the latter ; and if this should prove to be the case, the 
term ddde, having been proposed prior to that of rufocaligata, should 
be adopted for this species. 


186. SparHura cisstura, Gould . . . Vol. III. Pl. CLXVI. 
Habitat. Peru. ; 
Perhaps the next in affinity, although not directly allied, are the 

members of the genus Lesbia, which are equally confined to the 


Andes, and fly at the same elevation as the Spathure. Like those 
birds, they are distributed along that great chain of mountains 


101 


throughout many degrees of latitude on each side of the equator. 
They may be regarded as among the most elegant of the Trochilidee. 
Their long and deeply cleft tails would seem to indicate that they 
possess very great powers of aérial progression,—a remark which 
equally applies to the members of the genera Cynanthus and Cometes. 


Genus Less1a, Less. 


187. Lesp1a Goutrpt . . . . «~~ «Voi. III. Pl. CLXVII. 
Trochilus Gouldii, Lodd. 
Ornismya sylphia, Less. 
Mellisuga Gouldii, Gray & Mitch. 
Cynanthus gouidi, Bonap. 
Lesbia Gouldii, Reichenb. 
Agaclyta Gouldi, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil i. p. 70. 
Habitat. The high lands of New Granada, particularly the neigh- 
bourhood of Bogota. 


188. Lespia Graciuis, Gould. . . . Vol. IID. Pl. CLXVIII. 
Trochilus (Lesbia) gracilis, Gould. 
Mellisuga gracilis, Gray & Mitch. 
Cynanthus gracilis, Bonap. 
Lesbia gracilis, Reichenb. | 


Habitat. Ecuador. 


oO. “neers NUNA si .o>.s a 4 «he VOL, Lid El, Gale 
Ornismya Nuna, Less. ? 
Habitat. Peru. 


Refer to my remarks respecting this bird in the letter-press accom- 
panying the Plate. 


190. Lespra AMARYLLIS . . . . Sah cs Wp A Wee id Bal 6 B. 


Trochilus Amaryllis, Boure. et Muls., Gray & Mitch. 
Cynanthus amaryllis, Bonap. 
*Trochilus Victorie, Bourc. Rev. Zool. 1846, p. 315, pl. 4. 
* Mellisuga Victoria, Gray & Mitch. Gen. of Birds, vol. i. p. 103, 
Mellisuga, sp. 94. 
*Cynanthus Victorie, Bonap. Consp. Gen. Av. tom. i. p. 81. 
Cynanthus, sp. 6. 
*Lesbia Victorie, Reich. Aufz. der Col. p. 8; Id. Troch. Enum, 
p. 5, pl. 715. figs. 4622-23. - ; 
* Psalidoprymna Victoriae, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iti. p. 52. 


Habitat. New Granada, Ecuador, and Peru. 


Dark or nearly black varieties not unfrequently occur among the 
Trochilidee ; and I think that the bird to which M. Bourcier has 
given the name of Vietori@ is merely such a variety of the L. Ama- 
ryllis. ? 


192. Dessia prodanis-> eo. Mo soo. 1: PLACA 


Trochilus eucharis, Boure. 
Lesbia eucharis, Reichenb. 
Cynanthus eucharis, Bonap. 
“*Lesbia bifurcata, Reich. Troch. Enum. pl. 716. figs. 4624-25. 


Habitat. New Granada. 


Considerable, and I fear inextricable, confusion exists with regard 
to the genera Lesbia and Cynanthus, which would appear to be due 
to the various authors who have used those terms taking their cha- 
racters from defective descriptions or imperfect drawings, instead of 
actual specimens. This confusion I have endeavoured to rectify 
by applying the terms to the birds which I believe their respective 
proposers actually intended, and I do hope that, for the sake of 
science, they will be allowed so to stand for the future. 


Leaving the genus Lesdia, then, we proceed to that of Cynanthus, 
. and here we arrive at some of the most remarkable and the most 
beautiful of the Trochilidee. Strictly confined to the great Andean 
mountains and the spurs which jut out as far as eastern Venezuela, 
these blue-tailed birds enjoy a range of habitat extending from the 
lands washed by the Caribbean Sea to Peru. 

Those inhabiting the neighbourhood of Bogota appear to be 
divided into two or three local varieties or races ; for they are not, in 
my opinion, sufficiently different to warrant us in regarding them as 


species. Onthe other hand, the Ecuadorian bird possesses characters 
which induced me to consider it distinct. 

The variation observable among the Bogotan birds is principally 
in the colouring of the tail—some having the whole of the feathers 
blue, while others have the eight central ones tipped with beautiful 
green. 


Genus Cynantuus, Swains. 


192. CynanTHUS CyANURUS . . .. .. Vol. III. Pl. CLXXII. 


Trochilus cyanurus, Steph. 
Ornismya Kingii, Less. 
*Lesbia forficatus, Reich. Aufz. der Col. p. 8; Id. Troch. Enum. 
p- 5, pl. 718. figs. 4628-29. 
Lesbia Gorgo, Reich. Aufz. der Col. pp. 8, 24; Id. Troch. Enum. 
p.5; Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil ii. p. 71. 

Habitat. New Granada. 

A somewhat smaller and more delicate bird than the Cynanthus 
cyanurus occurs in Venezuela, having the whole of the body green, 
with the exception of a patch of blue on the throat; and the crown 
brilliant metallic green, without the superciliary stripe of black seen 
in that species: I refrain, however, for the present ‘from character- 
izing it as distinct. 


193. Cynanruus Ca@Lestis, Gould. 
Habitat. Ecuador. 


103 


This new Humming-Bird is considerably larger than the C. eyanu- 
rus; it also presents a marked difference in the colouring of the 
under surface,.which is uniform coppery brown, instead of green ; in 
other respects the colouring is very similar to the specimens from 
Bogota, with green and blue tails. Inno instance have I seen a spe- 
cimen from Ecuador with an entirely blue tail, whereas they frequently 
occur among those sent. from Bogota. 


194. Cynantuus Mocoa. 
Cynanthus smaragdicaudus, Gould. . Vol, IL. Pl. CLXXIII. 


-Trochilus Mocoa, Delatt. et Bourc. 
(Lesbia) smaragdinus, Gould. 
Mellisuga smaragdinis, Gray & Mitch. 
Cynanthus mocoa, Bonap- 


_ Habitat. Peru and Bolivia. 


Specimens of this species, like those of the C. eyanurus, are found |” 
to differ considerably ; but as it is a bird of comparative rarity, we \ \ 
have seen too few examples to come to any positive conclusion as to 
whether these are referable to one or two species. The Mocoa may 
be regarded as the southern representative of the C. cyanurus. It 
frequents the forests of Bolivia and Peru, particularly those clothing 
the eastern slopes of the great Andean range. 


As the Lesbie naturally led-us on to the Cynanthi, so do the 
latter in their broad tail-feathers offer an alliance to the Comete ; 
and, however much I have extolled the beauty of any of the prece- 
ding genera, it is scarcely possible to select terms sufficiently ex- 
pressive to convey an idea of the loveliness of the birds comprised in 
this latter genus. The two birds generally known under the names 
of Sappho and Phaon are par excellence the most gorgeous birds 
in existence so far as regards the colouring of their tails; and well 
do these living meteors deserve the more general name of Comets. 


Genus Cometes, Gould. 
(Koparys, cometa.) 

Generic characters. 

Male.—Bill longer than the head, straight or slightly arched ; 
wings moderate ; tail long and deeply forked, the feathers broad and 
luminous ; farsi naked; feet small; hind toe and nail nearly as long 
as the middle toe and nail ; throat luminous. 

Female.—Swmaller in size and nearly destitute of fine colouring. 


195. CoMETES SPARGANURUS . - - .~ Vol. III. Pl. CLXXIV. 


Trochilus sparganurus, Shaw, Steph., Jard. 
chrysurus, Cuv. 

—_—— _radiosus, Temm. 

Ornismya Sappho, Less. 

Cometes Sappho, Gould. 

sparganurus, Bonap.. 
Mellisuga sparganura, Gray & Mitch. 


104 


Orthorhynchus chrysurus, D’ Orb. et Lafres. 
Trochilus chrysochloris, Vieill. 
*Cynanthus sparganurus, Jard. Nat. Lib. Humming Birds, vol. ii. 


*Troohilus (Oynanthus) chrysurus, Tsch. Consp. p. 36, sp. 200 ; 
Id. Faun. Per. p. 244. 

* Orthorhynchus chrysurus, D’Orb. et Lafres. Syn. p. 26. 

* Sappho sparganura, Reich. Aufz. der Col. p. 9; Id. Troch. Enum. 
p- 5, pl. 724. figs. 4651-52. 

*Lesbia sparganura, Bonap. Rev. et Mag. de Zool. 1854, p. 252. 

*Sparganura Sappho, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 52. 


Habitat. Bolivia. ' 


186; Conuane Puiaom; Could. see ee ee Cae 


Mellisuga phaon, Gray & Mitch. Gen. of Birds, vol. i. p. 113, 
Mellisuga, sp. 47. 
Cometes phaon, Bonap. 
* Sappho phaon, Reich. Aufz. der Col. p. 9 ; Id. Troch. Enum. p. 5, 
pl. 725. figs. 4653-54. 
*Lesbia phaon, Bonap. Rev. et Mag. de Zool. 1854, p. 252. 
*Sparganurus Phaon, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil in. p. 52, note. 


Habitat. Peru. 


197. Cometes? Guyvcerta . . . . Vol. III. Pl. CLXXVI. 


Cometes Mossai, Gould. 
Lesbia glyceria, Bonap. 

*Sparganura Mossat, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 52, note. 
Habitat. Popayan in New Granada. 


This is perhaps the most extraordinary bird I have had the good 
fortune to describe. I have placed it in the genus Cometes with a 
reservation ; for it comprises characters which are found both in 
Lesbia and Cometes: in form it most nearly approaches the latter, 
while in its markings and in the colouring of its throat it resembles 
the former. At present only a single example has been obtained, 
and this, I am inclined to think, is not quite adult ; it may possibly 
be only a young male of a splendidly coloured but unknown species ; 
and if so, a fine bird remains in store to reward the researches of some 
future explorer. 


198. Cometres? Carotr . . . . .. Vol. Hl. Pl. CLXXVII. 


Trochilus Caroli, Bourc. 

Hylocharis Caroli, Gray & Mitch., Bonap. 
Calliphlox Caroli, Reichenb. 

Avocettinus carolus, Bonap. 


Habitat. Peru. 
Of this remarkable bird about four specimens have been in our 


collections for many years ; but whether they are males or females is 
unknown; for in fact nothing has been recorded respecting these 


105 


puzzling birds. If the description accompanying my plate of the 
species be referred to, it will be seen that it has been bandied about 
from one genus to another, different authors having assigned. it to 
Trochilus, Hylocharis, Calliphlow, and Avocettinus! Some day, 
when the little-known country of Peru has been more fully investi- 
gated, we shall doubtless acquire a better knowledge of it, and be 
able to decide to which genus it really pertains: for the present let 
it remain in the one in which I have placed it. 


Genus PreROPHANES, Gould. 
(IIrepor, ala, et daiva, ostendo. ) 


Generic characters. 
Male.—Bill cylindrical, longer than the head, and slightly up- 
curved ; wings very large and sickle-shaped ; ¢ai/ broad and large ; 
tarsi clothed; feet small; hind toe shorter than the middle one ; 
claws long, slightly curved, and sharp at the point. 
Female.—Unadorned. 


199. Pruropuanes Temmincxi . . Vol. ITI. Pl. CLXXVIIT. 


Ornismya Temmincki, Boiss. 
‘Trochilus cyanopterus, Lodd. MS. 
Mellisuga Temmincki, Gray & Mitch. — 
*«Pterophanes Temmincki, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col.p.14; Id. Troch. 
Enum. p. 11; Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil ii. p. 80. 


Habitat. New Granada and Ecuador. 


The Pterophanes Temmincki must rank with the Patagona gigas 
among the very largest of the Humming-Birds ; the two species are 
nearly equal in size, but in their structure and the colouring of their 
plumage they are very different. The native country of the P. Tem- 
mincki is the temperate portion of the Andes, over which it ranges 
for a considerable distance from Bogota, the probable centre of its 
area. I have also seen specimens from Ecuador, where it appears to 
be scarce. This fine bird is rendered a very striking species by the 
beautiful blue colouring of its wings. 


Genus Acuamactis, Gould. 
(‘Aydaia, splendor, et dkris, radius solaris. ) 

Generic characters. : 

Moale.—Bill rather short, depressed at the base, and straight ; 
wings long and powerful ; primaries, particularly the outer one, 
sickle-shaped ; tail moderately large, and slightly forked when closed ; 
tarsi partially clothed ; feet strong and powerful ; hind toe and nail 
longer than the middle toe and nail; dreast ornamented with a tuft 
of lengthened plumes ; back luminous when viewed from behind. 

The birds for which I instituted the above genus have always 
greatly interested me. They are of large size, have very ample wings, 
and are distinguished from all other Humming-Birds by their lumi- 


106 


nous backs, of which the rich and glittering hues are only percept- 
ible when viewed from behind, or reversely to the direction of the 
feathers ; contrary to the law which regulates the disposition of the 
colouring in all the other genera except in Ceeligena, where it is 
slightly apparent. All the species are natives of the Andes, over 
which they roam from the northern part of New Granada to Bolivia. 
The latter country is the cradle of the Agleactis Castelnaudi and 
the richly coloured 4. Pamela. These extraordinary birds, to which 
I have given the trivial name of Sunbeams, are among the most won- 
derful of the Trochilide. 


200. AGLHZACTIS CUPRIPENNIS . . . Vol. III. Pl. CLXXIX. 


Trochilus cupripennis, Bourc. et Muls. 
Mellisuga cupripennis, Gray & Mitch. 
Agleactis cupripennis, Bonap. 
cupreipennis, Bonap. 
Helianthea cupripennis, Reichenb. 
*Aglaiactis cupripennis, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 69. 


Habitat. New Granada. 


Professor Jameson and Mr. Fraser state that ‘“ The females of this 
species have the glittering back, but not so brilliant as in the males.” 
—Ibis, vol. i. p. 400. 


201. Acumactis AAQUATORIALIS. 


Aglaiactis equatorialis, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iti. p. 70, 
note. 


Habitat. Ecuador. 


This bird is considered distinct from H. cupripennis by Dr. Cabanis ; 
but the only difference I can perceive between this and Bogota speci- 
mens is in its larger size and longer wing ; but if this be admitted as 
a species, I must further increase the list by calling another parvula, 
of which I have two specimens shot by M. Warszewicz in Peru or 
Bolivia, for the precise locality is unknown to me. © 


202. AGL@HACTIS PARVULA, Gould. 
Habitat. Peru, or Bolivia. 


This bird has a much shorter bill, is of a deeper red on the under 
surface, more red in the tail, and altogether of much smaller size. 
Total length 4} inches ; bill 41; wing 3; tail 13. 
203. AGLHACTIS CAUMATONOTA, Gould. 
Agleactis caumatonotus, Gould in Proc. Zool. Soc. part xvi. 1848, 
pee. 


Habitat. Peru, or Bolivia. 


Described by me as above from a single specimen said to have 
been procured in Peru, which differs from the preceding in being of 


107 


smaller size and in the darker hue of the luminous portion of the 
back. 


204. AcL@HactTis CASTELNAUDI 


Trochilus Castelnaudii, Bourc. et Muls. 
Castelnaui, Gray & Mitch. 

Aglaeactis castelnaudi, Bonap. , 

Agleactis castelneaui, Bonap. 
* Aglaeactis Castelnaudi, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 9. 
*Helianthea Castelnaudi, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 6, pl. 739. 

fies. 4694-95. 

* AglaiactisCastelnaui, Cab .et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 69, note. 
*Ornismya Castelnandii, Dev. Rev. et Mag. de Zool. 1852, p. 216. 


Habitat. The mountains near Cusco in Peru. 


M. Deville says “this bird, which is very rare, confines itself to the 
blossoms of a species of mimowa, the odours of which attract the small 
insects which form its food. Its cry is very piercing ; its flight very 
rapid and noisy. This species, which is quite new, was killed by 
myself in the valley of Echaraté, near Cusco.” 


205. AGLHACTIS PAMELA . Vol. IJ. Pl. CLXXXI. 


Orthorhynchus Pamela, D’Orb. et Lafres. 
Hylocharis Pamela, Gray & Mitch. 
Aglectis pamela, Bonap. 
Helianthea Pamela, Reichenb. 
* Aglaiactis Pamelae, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 69. 


Habitat. Bolivia. 


Distinct from every other genus are the two species of Oxypogon. 
These bearded birds ‘stand quite alone among the Trochilide ; and 
although not remarkable for brilliancy of colour, their fantastic mark- 
ings, towering crests, and lengthened beards render them very con- 
spicuous objects. I shall not be surprised if other species of this 
form be discovered when the higher peaks of the great Andean range 
of mountains have been more closely examined. 

For a long time the Oxypogon Guerini was the only species known ; 
but inthe year 1842 the intrepid traveller Mons. J. Linden ascended 
the high mountains of the Sierra Nevada de Merida, and was re- 
warded by the discovery of the second species, which bears his name. 


Vol. III. Pl. CLXXX. 


Genus OxyroGon, Gould. 
(‘Ofds, acutus, et maywr, barba.) 
Generic characters. é 
Male.—Bill shorter than the head, feeble, and straight ; face 
both above and below ornamented with lengthened plumes, the former 
erect, the latter pendent ; wings rather long ; fail large and forked 
when closed ; tarsi bare; feet large and strong ; hind toe and nail 


longer than the middle toe and nail. 
Female.—Smaller, and destitute of the ornamental face-plumes. 


206. Oxypocon Guerinr . . . ~ Vol. IL. Pl. CLXXXII. 
Ornismia Guerinii, Boiss. 
Trochilus parvirostris, Fras. 
Ornismya Guerinii, Lodd. 
Mellisuga Guerinii, Gray & Mitch. 
*Oxypogon Guerint, Reich. Aufz. der Col. p. 12; Id. Troch. Enum. 
p- 10; Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 67. 


Habitat. New Granada; plentiful around Bogota. 


207. Oxyrpocon Linpent . . . . Vol. III. Pl. CLXXXIII. 


Ornysma Lindenii, Parz. 
Mellisuga Lindenti, Gray & Mitch. 
*Oxypogon Lindeni, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 12; Id. Troch. 
Enum. p. 10; Cab. et Hein. Mus. Heim. Theil iii. p. 67, note. 


Habitat. The Sierra Nevada de Merida in New Granada. 


“This bird,” says M. Linden, “inhabits the regions immediately 
beneath the line of perpetual congelation, and never at a less eleva- 
tion than 9000 feet.” It might be thought that such bleak and 
inclement situations were ill-adapted for so delicate a structure as 
that of the Humming-Bird ; but there, and there only, does it dwell, 
while the equally lofty Paramos of Bogota are the native locality of 
the allied species O. Guerini. The minute insects which frequent 
the alpine flora of these districts afford abundance of food to these 
birds ; and beautifully constructed are their little bills for searching 
among the flowers in which they are found. 

Near the members of the genus Ozypogon are the various species 
of Ramphomicron, another bearded group, but differing in the total 
absence of any lengthened plumes on the crown, and in the structure 
and colour of the pendent chin feathers. It will only be necessary 
to glance at the plates on which these species are depicted to per- 
ceive that, though they bear a general resemblance to the Oxypogons, 
they are generically distinct from them. Their short and feeble bills 
indicate that they feed on a similar kind of insect food; and we 
know that such flowers as those of Sida and other plants with open 
corollas are frequently visited for the insects which abound therein. 

It is said that the members of this genus fly with great rapidity, 
and that like flashes of light they are constantly dashing about the hill- 
sides from one flower to another. It must be extremely interesting 
to watch the aérial movements of these comparatively large birds 
among the lofty regions they frequent, and where the air is so pure 
and rarified. In all the hilly countries, from the Caribbean Sea 
southward to Bolivia, are the members of this genus to be obtained ; 
in the neighborhood of Bogota one of them is very common: this 
bird (the R. heteropogon) extends its range from thence to about the 
latitude of Popayan, while the little microrhyncha is equally abundant 
in New Granada and Ecuador. At Quito, or around those towering 
mountains immediately under the equator, we find the Stanleyi 
and Herrani; while Bolivia gives us the Vulcani and the rujiceps. 


109 


Genus RampHomicron, Bonap. 
908. RAMPHOMICRON HETEROPOGON . Vol. III. Pl. CLX XXIV. 


Ornismya heteropogon, Boiss, 
Trochilus coruscus, Fras. 
Mellisuga heteropogon, Gray & Mitch. 
Ramphomicron heteropogon, Bonap. 
*Lampropogon heteropogon, Bonap. Rev. & Mag. de Zool. 1854, 
. 252. 
* Ohaleostigna heteropogon, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 12. 
* Ramphomicron heteropogon, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 10 ; Cab. 
et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iti. p. 67. 


Habitat. New Granada. 


I possess two very marked varieties or races of this bird, one being | 
much smaller than the other: the large race, I believe, is from Pam- | 


plona, and the smaller from the neighbourhood of Bogota. 


209. Rampnomicron Stanteyi . . Vol. III. Pl. CLXXXV. 


 Trochilus Stanleyi, Boure. et Muls. 
*Chalcostigma Stanleyi, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 12 ; Id. Troch. 


Enum. p. 10. 
Habitat. Ecuador. 
210. RAMPHOMICRON VULCAN], Gould Vol. Il. Pl. CLXXXVI. 


*Chalcostigma Vulcani, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. pl. 12. 
*Ramphomicron Vulcani, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 10. 


Habitat. Bolivia. 
211. Rampnomicron Herrant. . Vol. Ill. Pl. CLXXXVII. 


Trochilus Herrani, De Latt. & Boure. 
Calothorax herrani, Bonap. 
*Chalcostigma Herrani, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 12; Id. Troch. 


Enum. p. 10. 
*Lampropogon herrani, Bonap. Rev. et Mag. de Zool. 1854, p. 253. 
Habitat. Ecuador. . 
212. RaMPHOMICRON RUFICEPS,Gould. Vol. III. Pl. CLXXXVHI. 


Trochilus (—-— °) ruficeps, Gould. 
Mellisuga ruficeps, Gray & Mitch. 
Ramphomicron ruficeps, Bonap. 
* Ramphomicron ruficeps, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 12; Id. Troch. 


Enum. p. 10. 
* Lampropogon ruficeps; Bonap. Rev. et Mag. de Zool. 1854, p. 253. 


Habitat. Bolivia. 
213. RAMPHOMICRON MICRORHYNCHUS, Vol. III. Pl. CLXXXIX. 


Ornismya microrhyncha, Boiss. 
Trochilus brachyrhynchus, Fras. 


110 


Mellisuga microrhyncha, Gray & Mitch. 
Ramphomicron microrhyncha, Bonap. . 
*Rhamphomicron microrhynchum, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 12; 
Id. Troch. Enum. p. 10, pl. 718. figs. 4915-18, 
*Rhamphomicrus microrhynchus, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. 
- {Us 
* Trochilus euanthes, Licht. in Mus. of Berlin. 


Habitat. The Andes from the equator to seven degrees north. 


I must now ask those who take an interest in the various forms 
of this family of birds to turn to my plate of Urosticte Benjamini, 
and examine the little bird figured thereon with a beautiful gorget 
of green and purple. This species is rendered very singular by the 
two tufts of white feathers which spring from behind the eye, and 
still more so by the white tipping of the four central tail-feathers. 
Ornithologists will view this character with astonishment, and in- 
wardly ask, Is this particular mark given for a special purpose in 
connexion with the economy of the bird, or-for the mere purpose 
of ornament? That ornament and variety is the sole object, I have 
myself but little doubt. OF this recently acquired form, the single 
species to which I have assigned the generic name of Urosticte is all 
that is known. Like so many others that have preceded it, this is 
an Andean species, its native country being Ecuador. 


Genus UrosticTs, Gould. 
(Ovpad, cauda, et orrds, notatus.) 


Generic characters. 

Male.— Bill much longer than the head, and straight ; head round, 
the feathers not advancing on the bill; wings moderately long and 
rather pointed ; ¢azl slightly forked ; tarsi clothed ; hind toe shorter 
than the middle toe; throat luminous. 

Female.—Unadorned. © — 


214. Urosticre BENJAMINI « . . « «+ Vol. HI. Pl. CX€. 


Trochilus Benjamini, Boure. 

*Urosticta Benjamini, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 13. 

*Bastlinna Benjamini, Reich. Troch. Enum. p. 11. 

*Urosticte benjaminus, Bonap, Rev. et Mag. de Zool. 1854, p. 253. 
Habitat. Ecuador. 


' Tt will have been observed that each of the foregoing groups is 
characterized by certain peculiarities, and that one feature is more 
prominent than the others in each of the different forms; in some 
the back, and back only, is lit up with luminous colours ; in others, 
the throat is the only part thus adorned; in another (the Ptero- 
phanes) the wings alone are lustrous. The group which stands 
next on my list of genera and species have their share of ornament 
disposed on their broad and ample tails. In nearly every species this 


{11 


organ is illumined with brilliantly shining colours—some blue, others 
purple, and others, again, bronze ; in some these glittering hues appear 
on both the upper and under surface, while in others it is either con- 


fined to or is most brilliant on the latter. These colours, I am sure, ; 


the bird has the power of displaying to the greatest advantage, in 
order to render himself as attractive as may be when desirous of 
pleasing the female, perhaps, like the Peacock, for the purpose of his 


own vain glory. These varied beauties serve to increase our admira- 


tion of nature’s works. At least such is the feeling they create in | 


my own breast. 


Genus Merautuura, Gould. 
(Méraddov, metallum, et ovpa, cauda.) 


Generic characters. 


Male.—Bill straight and of moderate length ; wings moderate ; 


tail rather large and rounded ; tars bare ; feet rather large ; hind 
toe and nail as long or longer than the middle toe and nail; 
throat and under surface of the tail luminous, like shining metal. 

Female.—Much less brilliant than the male, and in most of the 
species destitute of the luminous throat-mark. 

All the members of this genus are tenants of the Andes, and by 
far the greater portion of them of Bolivia and Peru; one species, 
however (the M. tyrianthina), ranges over the whole of the tempe- 
rate portions of New Granada. I now proceed to arrange the species 
according to their affinities, commencing with the largest and most 


gorgeously coloured. 


215. MeraLtura cupreicaupa, Gould . Vol. III. Pl. CXCI. 


Trochilus ( ?) cupricauda, Gould. 
_ Mellisuga cupreo-cauda, Gray & Mitch. 
Metallura cupreicaudus, Bonap. 
—_. cupreicauda, Reichenb. 
Agleactis cupreicauda, Bonap. 
*Trochilus (Lampornis) opaca, “ Licht.” Tschudi, Consp. pp. 38, 
210; Id. Faun. Peru. p. 248, 13. 
*Metallura opaca, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iti. p. 69. 


Habitat. Bolivia. 

In the third part of his “Museum Heineanum,”’ Dr. Cabanis has 
placed the specific name of opaca to this species as having the 
priority ; if this should prove to be correct, my name of cupreicauda 
must sink into a synonym. 


216. 1 rene ce Gould. . Wel HAP CXCII, 


Trochilus (—— °) eneocauda, Gould. 

Mellisuga eneocauda, Gray & Mitch. 

Metallura eneicaudus, Bonap. 
eneicauda, Reichenb. 


Agleactis eneicauda, Bonap. 


112 


*Urolampra aeneicauda, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil i. p. 68. 
Habitat. Bolivia. 


217. Merattura Witutramit . - - - Vol. III. Pl. CXCIII. 


Trochilus Williami, Boure. et De Latt. 
Mellisuga Williami, Gray & Mitch. 
Metallura Williami, Bonap., Reichenb. 
william, Bonap. 
*Urolampra Williami, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil in. p. 68, 
note. 


Habitat. Popayan. 


218. Merautura Primouit, Bonap. . . Vol. Il. Pl. CXCIV. 


Metallura promolina, Boure., Reichenb. 
primolinus, Bonap. 

Urolampra primolina, Cab. 

Habitat. Peru. 


219, METALLURA TYRIANTHINA . . . Vol. ITT. Pl. CXCV. 


Trochilus tyrianthinus, Lodd. 
Ornismya Allardi, Boure. 
Pauline, Boiss. 
Trochilus Allardi, Jard. 
Mellisuga tyrianthinus, Gray & Mitch. 
Metallura tyrianthina, Reichenb. 
tyrianthinus, Bonap. 
*Urolampra tyrianthina, Cab. et Hein.Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 68. 


Habitat. New Granada. 


In my account of Metallura tyrianthina, 1 have given that bird 
a very wide range of habitat, extending from the Gulf of Darien to 
Ecuador; but having since had ample opportunities for examining 
numerous specimens from every locality, I find that the birds from 
Eucador are so much larger than those from Bogota that I cannot do 
otherwise than regard them as distinct. In examples from the two 
localities mentioned, there is a difference of more than half an inch 
in the length of their wings, and fully an eighth in the length of 
their bills; I observe also that the small birds from Bogota are 
much more richly coloured than the larger ones from Ecuador ; the 
throat is of a more beautiful green, the abdomen much darker, and 
the reddish-purple of the tail more resplendent; believing the 
Ecuadorian bird to be distinct, I have no alternative but to give it a 
name, and I therefore propose for it that of Quitensis :— 


220. Merattura Quitensis, Gould. 
Habitat. Ecuador. 


221. METALLURA sMARAGDINICoLLIS. . Vol. III. Pl. CXCVI. 


Orthorhynchus smaragdinicollis, D’ Orb. et Lafres. 
Mellisuga smaragdinicollis, Gray & Mitch. 


LIS 


Metallura smaragdinicollis, Bonap., Reichenb. gues 
*Urolampra smaragdinicollis, Cab, et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil m1. 


p- 68, note. 
Habitat. Peru and Bolivia. 


Varied as have been the subjects hitherto referred to in the 
present volume, and beautiful as is the colouring of many of the 
species, the next genus is composed of birds which cannot boast of 
any brilliancy of colourmg; on the contrary, they are clothed im 
very sombre attire, and have nothing to recommend them to our 
notice but chaste and delicate hues ; still in my opinion they are not 
the less interesting. 


Genus ApELomytA, Bonap. . 
222, ADELOMYIA INORNATA, Gould. . Vol. III. Pl. OXcVil. 


Trochilus ( ?) inornata, Gould. 
Mellisuga inornata, Gray & Mitch. 
Ramphomicron inornatus, Bonap. 
Adelomyia inornata, Bonap. 
Metallura inornata, Reichenb. 
* Adelisca inornata, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 72, note. 


Habitat. Bolivia. 
223. ADELOMYIA MELANOGENYS . .- Vol. U1. Pl. CXCVILL. 


Trochilus melanogenys, Fras. 
—_—___— Sabine, Boure. et Muls. 
Mellisuga Sabine, Gray & Mitch. 
melanogenys, Gray & Mitch. 

Ramphomicron sabinae, Bonap. 
melanogenys, Bonap. 

Adelomyia sabina, Bonap. 

Metallura Sabinae, Reich. 
| * Adelisca melanogenys, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil ii. p. 72. 


Habitat. New Granada, Ecuador, and Peru. 


4 


Precisely the same kind of difference occurs between examples of | 


| 
t 


this form from Venezuela and Ecuador that has been described as 

occurring with regard to the Metallura tyrianthina and M. Quitensis. | 
| The Adelomyia of Ecuador and Peru is very considerably larger than 
the A. melanogenys from Venezuela; it has more buff at the base of 

the tail-feathers, and a much more conspicuously spotted throat and 

breast ; for this Ecuadorian bird I therefore propose the name of 
maculata :— 


. 994 Apeiomyia macULsTA, Gould ., «Vol. EI. Pl CXCIX. 
Habitat. Vcuador. 
Avocettula and Avocettinus ave the generic terms applied to the 


two species rendered remarkable by the points of the mandibles being 
curved upwards in the shape of a hook: this extraordinary deviation 


} 
t 
4 


114 


from the usual structure is doubtless designed for some especial pur- 
pose; but what that may be, is at present unknown to us. 

In placing these two species near to each other I do not mean to 
convey an idea that they are very nearly allied. One isan inhabitant 
of the Andes, the other of Guiana and the neighbouring countries. 
Nothing whatever is known respecting these singular birds. 


Genus AvoceTTINus, Bonap. 


225. AVOCETTINUS EURYPTERUS . . . .. Vol. III. Pl. CC. 


Trochilus eurypterus, Lodd. 
Polytmus euryptera, Gray & Mitch. 
Trochilus Georgine, Boure. 
Polytmus Georgine, Gray & Mitch. 
“Delattria georgina, Bonap. 
Avocettinus eurypterus, Bonap. 
Avocettula euryptera, Reichenb. 
—————. Georginae, Reichenb. 
*Opisthoprora euryptera, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil ui. p. 76, 
note. 


Habitat. The high lands of New Granada. 


Genus AvocetruLa, Reichenb. 


226. AvocETTULA RECURVIROSTRIS . . . Vol. ITI. Pl. CCI. 
Trochilus recurvirostris, Swains. 
Mellisuga? recurvirostris, Steph. 
Ornismya recurvirostris, Less. 
avocetta, Less. 
Campylopterus recurvirostris, Swains. 
Hylocharis recurvirostris, Gray & Mitch, 
Avocettinus recurvirostris, Bonap. 
——-— lessoni, Bonap. 
Avocettula recurvirostris, Bonap., Reich. 
*Trochilus avocetta, Jard. Nat. Lib. Humming Birds, vol. i. p. 78, 
ig 
il recurvirostris, Jard. Nat. Lib. Humming Birds, vol. ii. 
Heli 
* Hylocharis avocetta, Gray & Mitch. Gen. of Birds, vol. i. p. 114, 
Hylocharis, sp. 12. 
* Streblorhamphus recurvirostris, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. 


p- 76. 
Habitat. The Guianas. 


Genus ANTHOCEPHALA, Cab. 


This generic term has been proposed by Dr. Cabanis for the bird 
I have figured under the name of Adelomyia floriceps, which is at 
present the only species of the form known ; for, although I have 
ventured to place with it my <Adelomyia ? castaneiventris, | am 


iG 


unable to say, from the imperfect materials at my command, whether 
it really belongs to the present or to some other genus. 
227. ANTHOCEPHALA FLORICEPS. 
Adelomyia floriceps, Gould . . . . . Vol. Il. Pl. CCI. 
Trochilus ( 2) floriceps, Gould. 
Adelomyia floriceps, Bonap. 
Metallura floriceps, Reichenb. 


* Anthocephala floriceps, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 72, 
note. 


Habitat. Columbia. 
228. ANTHOCEPHALA? CASTANEIVENTRIS. 
Adelomyia ? castaneiventris, Gould. . . Vol. III. Pl. CCIII. 


Trochilus (——*) eastaneoventris, Gould. 
Metallura castaneiventris, Reichenb. 


Habitat. Chiriqui. 


The fourth volume commences with a species which plays no 
inconsiderable part as an article of trade; for it is the one, par 
excellence, of which thousands are annually sent to Europe for the 
purpose of contributing to the decorations of the drawing-rooms of 
the wealthy, for the manufacture of artificial flowers, &c.; and well 
suited is it for such purposes, its rich ruby and topaz-like colouring 
rendering it one of the most conspicuous and beautiful objects 
imaginable. The Chrysolampis moschitus (better known by its 
trivial name of Ruby and Topaz Humming-Bird) enjoys a very wide 
range, being found all over the eastern parts of Brazil, Cayenne, 
Guiana, Venezuela, the high lands of Bogota and Trinidad. 

The females of this form differ very widely from the males in the 
colouring of their plumage ; and the young males undergo so many 
changes between youth and maturity, that they must have puzzled 
the most astute of ornithological investigators. 


Genus CurysoLampis, Bove. 


999. CurRYSOLAMPIS MoscHITUS . . . . Vol. IV. Pl. CCIV. 
Trochilus moschitus, Linn. et auct. 
Mellisuga Brasiliensis, gutture topazino, Briss. 
Ornismya moschita, Less. 
Chrysolampis moschitus, Boié, Bonap. 
Mellisuga moschita, Steph., Gray & Mitch. 
Chrysolampis mosquitus, Bonap. Reichenb. 
Trochilus pegasus, Gmel. 

gujanensis, Gmel., Lath. 

carbunculus, Gmel., Lath. 

elatus, Gmel. 


Mellisuga Cayanensis, ventre griseo, Briss. 
Chrysolampis corbunculus, Reichenb. 
Trochilus hypopheus, Shaw. 


116 


* Chrysolampis moschita, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 21. 
* Chrysolampis Reichenbachi, Cab.et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii.p. 21. 


Habitat. Guiana, Cayenne, Brazil, Venezuela, the Andes of New 
Granada, and the islands of Trinidad and Tobago. 


Dr. Cabanis is of opinion that the bird from New Granada 
is distinct from that obtained in the other localities; but I must re- 
ceive more decided evidence that such is the case than I at present 
possess, before I can admit that there is any difference between the 
Andean and Brazilian examples; for the present, therefore, I place 
his name of C. Reichenbachi as a synonym of C. moschitus, which 
I believe to be the only species yet known of the genus. 

“This pretty little species,” says Mr. Kirk, “arrives in Tobago 
at the end of January or about the lst of February. It begins to 
build about the 10th, lays two pure white eggs, and sits fourteen 
days. It feeds on ants as well as flowers. I detected 115 small 
insects in the stomach of one I dissected. One of these birds 
having attached its nest to the trunk of a logwood tree close to a 
window of my residence, I had an opportunity of observing its 
manners during incubation, and I can assert that, although I con- 
fined the young by means of some coarse wire cloth, through 
which the parent could feed them, for upwards of three weeks after 
they were ready to leave the nest, and although she evinced the 
greatest distress by her chirping note when flying around me, often 
within three feet, I never but twice, from the laying until the period 
I mention, saw a male near the nest; and whether they pair seems 
to be disputed, as on both these occasions he was hotly pursued by 
the female to a considerable distance with all the bickering violence 
so peculiar to the tribe.”’—Hore Zoologice, by Sir W. Jardine, 
Bart., in Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist. vol. xx. p. 373. 


In proceeding next to the genus Orthorhynchus, composed of 
birds ornamented with glittering green and blue crests, I do not 
insist that they have any direct affinity with the last, nor are they 
intimately allied to the members of the succeeding one: a more 
isolated form, in fact, is not to be found among the Trochilide. 
Only two species have been recorded by previous writers, but spe- 
cimens of a third are contained both in the Loddigesian and my own 
collections ; I allude to the bird here described under the name of 
Orthorhynchus ornatus. 

All the members of the 


Genus ORTHORHYNCHUS, Cuw., 


are confined to the West India Islands, but our present knowledge 
of them does not admit of my stating positively the extent of the 
range of each species; this is a point which requires further in- 
vestigation. The females differ from the males in being destitute 
of the glittering crown. 


930. ORTHORHYNCHUS CRIsTATUS . . . . Vol. IV. Pl. CCV. 
Trochilus cristatus, Linn. et auct. 


117 


Mellisuga cristata, Briss., Gray & Mitch. 
Orthorhynchus cristatus, Bonap., Reichenb. 
Ornismya cristata, Less. 

Trochilus pileatus, Lath. 

puniceus, Gmel. 


* Orthorhynchus cristatus, Cab. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 61. 
Habitat. Barbadoes, and St. Vincent. 


The Rev. Lansdown Guilding states that this species “ sometimes 
deviates from its usual habits. In general it is remarkably wild, 
and soon disturbed. I once, however, saw a pair of this species 
almost domesticated, in the house of a gentleman whose kindness 
and humanity had brought round him many a lizard and winged 
pet. They built for many years on the chain of the lamp suspended 
over the dinner-table; and here they educated several broods, in a 
room occupied hourly by the family. I have been seated with a 
large party at the table when the parent bird has entered, and, 
passing along the faces of the visitors, displaying his glorious crest, 
has ascended to the young without alarm or molestation.” —Loudon’s 
Mag. Nat. Hist. vol. v. p. 570. 

931. ORTHORHYNCHUs oRNATUS, Gould. . Vol. IV. Pl. CCVI. 
*I’ Oiseau-mouche huppé, Less. Hist. Nat. des Ois.-mou. p. 113, 
pis. 31,32 7 - 

Habitat. One of the Windward Islands; but which of them, is 

unknown. 


Basal two-thirds of the crest green, the apical third blue; upper 
surface deep grass green ; throat dark smoky grey, becoming much 
darker on the abdomen; flanks glossed with green; wings and tail 
purplish black ; bill black. ; 

Total length 33 inches ; bill, 4; wing 14; tail 14. 

This species bears a general resemblance to the O. cristatus, but 
differs from that bird in being of a somewhat smaller size, and in 
having the basal two-thirds of the crest glittering green and the tip 
only blue; the crest is also longer and more elegant in form than that 
of C. cristatus or C.exilis. With the latter it never can be confounded, 
while the former may always be distinguished from it by the trun- 
cate form of the green portion of its crest. It is just possible that 
the birds represented on the 31st and 32nd plates of Lesson’s “ His- 
toire Naturelle des Oiseaux-mouches’ may have reference to this 
bird. 

932. ORTHORHYNCHUS EXILIS. . . . ~ Vol. IV. Pl. CCVIH. 
Trochilus exilis, Gmel., Lath., Vieill. 
Mellisuga ewilis, Gray & Mitch. 
Trochilus cristatellus, Lath., Vieill. 
Orthorhynchus chiorolophus, Bonap. 
exilis, Reichenb., Bonap., Cabanis. 
Habitat. The Islands of Martinique, Nevis, St. Thomas, and St. 
Croix. 


118 


“ After a careful examination of skins procured from St. Croix 
, and St. Thomas,” says Mr. Alfred Newton, “we refer them to the 
_ above-named species, though one of a male presents a slightly dif- 
_ ferent appearance from the ordinary type, in having a narrow blue 
edging to the otherwise golden-green crest, and thus exhibiting an 
' affinity to the closely-allied Blue-crest (O. eristatus) from St. Vin- 
cent and Barbadoes. The present bird has, we believe, hitherto 
been known only from Martinique and Nevis. 

“I shot a female of this species at Southgate Farm on the north 
shore of the eastern end of the Island of St. Croix, where much of 
the land, being out of cultivation, is chiefly covered with Casha 
bushes, interspersed with Manchioneel along the coast. I have been 
told that a Humming-Bird smaller than the ordinary one, and there- 
fore probably of this species, has been seen in other localities ; but 
it must be very uncommon. Of its habits I know nothing.” —Jbis, 
vol. i. p. 141. 


The Brazilian genus Cephalepis comprises two species, with 
lengthened ornamental crests terminating in a single plume, on 
which account they stand alone not only in their own family, but, 
so far as I am aware, among birds generally. The females are 
entirely devoid of this conspicuous character. I think it very pro- 
bable that additional species of this form will be discovered when 
the natural productions of the interior of Brazil become better 
known. 


Genus CepHa.epris, Boié. 


233. CEPHALEPIS DELALANDI . . . . Vol. IV. Pl. CCVIII. 


Trochilus Delalandi, Vieill., Temm,, Valenc., Less. &c. 
Ornismya Delalandi, Less. 
Trochilus versicolor, Vieill. 
Mellisuga Delalandi, Gray & Mitch. 
Cephalepis lalandii, Bonap. 
*Cephalepis Delalandii, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 12. 
* Orthorhynchus Delalandii, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p- 9. 
* Cephalolepis Delalandi, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p- 61. 


Habitat. Southern Brazil. 
234. CEPHALEPIS Loppicxsi, Gould. . . Vol. IV. Pl. CCIX. 


Trochilus Loddigesii, Gould, Less., Jard. 
optsthocomus, Licht. 
Cephalepis loddigesi, Bonap. 
Melhsuga Loddigesii, Gray & Mitch. 
* Cephalepis Loddiggesii, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 12. 
* Orthorhynchus Loddiggesii, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. Pp. 9. 
* Cephalolepis Loddigesi, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii, p- 61, 


note. 
Habitat. Minas Geraes and other parts of eastern Brazil. 


Near to Cephalepis is the 


i19 


Genus Kuais, Reichenb., 


of which but one species is known. This singular bird, which 
has no ornamental crest, and but little fine colouring to recommend 
it to our notice, is a native of Venezuela and the hilly parts of 
New Granada. The females of this form are much less highly 
coloured than the males. 


235. Kyuais GUIMETI .. . Foal ais s Wig dite fee 


Trochilus Guimeti, Boure et Muls. 
Hylocharis Guimeti, Gray & Mitch. 
Klais Guimeti, Reichenb. 
Myiabeillia guimeti, Bonap. 
* Basilinna Guimeti, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 12; Cab. et Hein. 
Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 45. 
* Myiabellia guimeti, Selat. in Proc. Zool, Soc. part xxv. p. 17, 
* Mellisuga Merrittii, Lawr. Ann. Lye. Nat. Hist. in New York, 
vol. vii. April 9, 1860. 


- Habitat. Venezuela and the Andes of New Granada. 


‘In the district of El Mineral” in New Granada, says Dr. Mer- 
ritt, “there has been a slight attempt at cultivation of the soil and 
planting of fruit trees. The Orange, the Guama, and Guayava 
trees are the most numerous, particularly the last named, which is 
very prolific, bearing nearly throughout the year fruit in all its 
stages from the blossom to maturity. Consequently the Guayava 
tree is the favourite resort of the Humming Bird. I often watched 
these little creatures feeding and quarrelling around a tree near the 
door of my palm-leaf hut, and soon my attention was attracted to 
one much smaller than the rest, whose pugnacity and indomitable 
‘pluck’ greatly amused me. Upon closer examination of this di- 
minutive feathered warrior my interest increased, as I soon became 
convinced that it was new to me. I frequently afterwards saw nu- 
merous specimens of it, and almost invariably encountered them 
feeding from the blossoms of the Guayava, and I therefore conclude 
they are quite local in their habitat.” 


Genus MyraBeILiia, Bonap. 


This is a very distinct generic form. Like that of Kats, it con- 
tains but a single species, a delicately formed bird inhabiting 
Mexico and Guatemala. The male is decorated with a brilliant 
green gorget, a feature which is entirely absent in the female. 


936. MYIABEILLIA TYPICA . - + + + ~ Vol. IV. Pl. CGAL. 


Trochilus Abeillei, Delatt. et Less. 
Mellisuga Abeillei, Gray & Mitch. 
Ramphomicron abeilleit, Bonap. 
Myiabeillia typica, Bonap. 
* Baucis Abeillei, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 13. 
* Abeillia typica, Bonap. Consp. Gen. Av. tom. i. p. 79, Rampho- 
micron, sp. 4. ; 


120 


*Basilinna Abeillii, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 11. 
*Baucis Abeillei, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 72. 


Habitat. Mexico and Guatemala. 


“Volcan de Fuego and Coban. The barrancos of the volcano 
are the only localities I am aware of, near Duefias, where this spe- 
cies is found. Here, however, it is a common bird. It is usually 
to be seen feeding about upon the brushwood, seeking the flowers, 
&e. It is a restless species, but shows little symptoms of fear. My 
skins from the Volcano are one female and three males. The pro- 
portions at Coban are very different. Here it is common, being 
found in all the mountain-hollows feeding among the Salvie. The 
ratio of the sexes is as twenty males to one female.” — Salvin in Lis, 
vol. ii. p. 262. 


I must now direct the notice of my readers to some of the most 
chaste and elegant species yet discovered of this or any other family 
of birds—namely, the members of the genera Heliactin, Heliothrix, 
Schistes, and Petasophora. 


Genus Hetiactin, Boté. 


The single species of this genus stands alone for the resplendent 
and richly coloured tufts of feathers which spring from above and 
behind the eye. 


Zoe SLIACTIN CORNUTS 3. °So Ee ae BY. pid SE Gees 8 thy 


Lrochilus cornutus, Pr. Max., Jard. 
dilophus, Vieill. 
bilophus, Temm. 
Ornismya chrysolopha, Less. 
Mellisuga bilopha, Steph. 
Heliactin cornuta, Bonap. 
Mellisuga cornuta, Gray & Mitch. 
Helactinia cornuta, Reichenb. 
* Heliactinus cornutus, Burm. Th. Bras. tom. ii. p- 356. 
* Trochilus bilobus, Licht. in Mus. of Berlin. 
* Heliactin cornuta, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p- 64. 


Habitat. Brazil, particularly the district of Minas Geraes, 


The female of this species, like that sex in the genus Heliothrix, 
has a longer and more ample tail than her mate,— in which respect 
the form offers an affinity to the members of the succeeding genus. 


Genus Hetiorurix, Boié. 


This, like the last, is a very well-marked form, of which two 
species are natives of Central America and New Granada, one of 
the regions of the upper Rio Negro, and two of the rich country of 
Brazil. They are all distinguished by being decorated with beautiful 
blue tufts on the sides of the neck, relieved by glittering green 
checks and snowy breasts. In addition to this fine display of 


121 


colours, two of them have rich blue crowns ; there is yet another 
character common, I believe, to the whole—that of the tail of the 


females being much larger and more lengthened than that of the 


males ; the young males, too, have this organ much more prolonged 


than in the adult males; they have all peculiarly sharp wedge- 


shaped bills, lengthened wings, and small feet. Judging from these 


points in their structure, I believe these birds to be endowed with the 
power of more rapid flight than any other members of the family. 


938, FIELIOTHRIX AURITUS + + + = * Vol. IV. Pl. CCXIII. 


Trochilus auritus, Gmel., Lath., Vieill., Swains. 
Mellisuga Cayenensis major, Briss. 
Ornismya aurita, Less. 
Heliothrix auritus, Boié, Gray & Mitch., Bonap. 
aurita, Gray. 
Ornismya nigrotis, Less. 
Heliothria nigrotis, Gray & Miteh., Bonap. 
* Trochilus leucocrotaphus, Vieill. Nouv. Dict. d’Hist. Nat. tom. vil. 
p. 374; Id. Ency. Méth. Orn. part. 2nde, p. 571. 
*Heliothrix aurita, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 13; ‘Troch. Enum. 
p-11; Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 28. 


Habitat. Northern Brazil, the banks of the Amazon, the Guianas, 
and Venezuela. 


939. HxeLioTHRIX AURICULATUS - + + > Vol. IV. Pl. CCXIV. 


Trochilus auriculatus, Licht. 
Ornismya Pouchettii, Less. 
Heliothrix auriculatus, Gray & Mitch. 
—_—_—— poucheti, Bonap. 
* Heliothrix auriculata, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p.13; Id. Troch. 
Enum. p. 11; Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 28. 
aurita, jun., Burm. Th. Bras. tom. ii. p- 336. 


Habitat. South-eastern Brazil. 


* 


940. HELIOTHRIX PHAINOLAMA, Ctl x 5 OV AY. PCR. 


* Heliothrix phenoleuca, Hartl. Wieg. Arch. xxii. 2. p. 23. 
* phenolema, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 28, 


note. 
Habitat. The banks of the Upper Rio Negro. 


94), HELIOTHRIx BARROTI- 
Heliothrix purpureiceps, Gould. . . Vol. IV. Pl. CCXVI. 
Heliothrix purpuretceps, Gould in Proc. Zool. Soc., part xxii. 


BBE ts st te 
Barroti, Salvin in Ibis, vol. iii. p. 410. 


Trochilus Barroti, Boure. 
Heliothria Barroti, Gray & Mitch., Bonap. 
* Heliothrix Barrott, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 13; Id. Troch. 
Enum. p.11; Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 28 note. 


122 


*Ornismya Gabriel, Delatt. Echo du Monde Savant, No. 45, Juin 
15, 1843, col. 1070. 

Habitat. Guatemala, Costa Rica, and the forests of New Granada 

bordering the Pacifie coast, as far south as Ecuador; Esme- 


raldas (Fraser ). 


942. HELIOTHRIX VIOLIFRONS, Gould. 
Teliothrix Barroth... . ... . . Vol IV. PL @CXVIL 


Habitat. Carthagena, or Veragua. 


On receiving this bird from M. Warszewicz, I considered it to be 
referable to the Heliothrix Barroti, and accordingly figured and 
described it under that name. Subsequently I received another 
bird with a differently coloured crown, which, believing it to be 
new, I described and figured as H. purpureiceps, but I now find 
that the latter is the true H. Barroti, and that the former is a new 
bird; I therefore propose for it the distinctive appellation of 
H. violifrons. 


Between the genera Heliothrix and Petasophora appears to be 
the proper situation for my genus Schistes; for to the former it 
is nearly allied in its wedge-shaped bill, and to the latter in the 
colouring of the tail. The three species known are all inhabitants 
of the Andes of New Granada and Ecuador. I have often thought 
that the white gular mark in Schistes albigularis is characteristic of 
immaturity ; but this is by no means certain. 


Genus ScuisTEs, Gould. 
(2x iZw, findo.) 

Generic characters. 

Male.— Bill longer than the head, straight, wedge-shaped at the 
tip ; wings moderately long and slightly rounded ; ¢ail rounded, the 
feathers broad ; tars? partially clothed ; feeé small ; hind toe and nail 
shorter than the middle toe and nail. 


243. ScHisTes GEOFFROYI . . . . . Vol. IV. Pl. CCXVIITI. 


Trochilus Geoffroyt, Boure. et Muls. 
Petasophora? Geoffroyi, Gould. 
Polytmus Geoffroyi, Gray & Mitch. 
Colibri Geoffroy, Bonap. 
* Schistes Geoffroyi, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 13. 
* Petasophora Geoffroyi, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 11. 
* Schistes Geoffroyz, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 27. 


Habitat. The Andes of New Granada. 

244. SCHISTES PERSONATUS, Gould . . Vol. IV. Pl. CCXIX. 
Schistes geoffroyii, Sclat. in Proc. Zool. Soc. part xxviii. p. 70. 
Habitat. Ecuador. g 


This bird was obtained by Mr. Fraser at Pallatanga. He re- 
marks, “I should have taken this to be the male of S. albogularis 
but for the colour of the feet and shape of the tail. Bill and feet 
black. Stomach contained insects.” 


123 


94h. SCHISTES ALBIGULARIS, Gould . . Vol. IV. Pl. CCXX. 


* Schistes albigularis, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 13. 
* Petasophora albigularis, Ib. Troch. Enum. p.11. 
* Schistes albigularis, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 27, note. 


Habitat. The western side of Pichincha, in Ecuador, at an eleva- 
tion of 6000 feet. 


Mr. Fraser, who procured this bird at Pallatanga, says, “ Bill 
black ; feet dark flesh-colour; gizzard contained insects; found in 
the underwood.” 


The members of the next genus, Augastes, have perhaps no direct 
alliance with the preceding ; but as they are characterized by masked 
faces, and have buffy marks on the sides of the chest, they are as well 
placed here as elsewhere. 

Both the 4. scutatus and A. Lumachellus are very beautiful 
species, and have had the trivial name of Vizor-bearers applied to 
them, from the very peculiar manner in which their entire faces are 
covered with shining metallic feathers, giving the birds the appear- 
ance of being masked; the under surface of their tails is also lumi- 
nous, in which respect they present a similarity to the Metallure. 


Genus Aueastes, Gould. 
(AbydZo, illucesco, de airy?), splendor.) 


Male.—Bill straight, longer than the head, and inclining to a 
wedge-shape at the tip; head round, the feathers not advancing 
upon the bill; wings rather long ; tail moderately long and square, 
the feathers broad ; tarsi clothed; feet small; hind toe very dimi- 
nutive ; face and tail luminous. 

Female.—Destitute of luminous colouring. 


246. AUGASTES scuratus . . . . . Vol. IV. Pl. CCXXI. 


Trochilus superbus, Vieill. 
scutatus, Natt., Temm., Jard. 
Ornismya Nattereri, Less. 
Hylocharis superba, Gray & Mitch. 
*Trochilus venustus, Licht. in Mus. of Berlin. 
* dugastes superbus, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 13; Troch. Enum. 
p- 11; Bonap. Rev. et Mag. de Zool. 1854, p. 253. 


Habitat. Ecuador. 


247, Aucastes Lumacuettus . . . Vol. IV. Pl. CCXXII. 


Ornismya lumachella, Less. 
Trochilus Lumachellus, Bourc. e 
Hylocharis Lumachellus, Gray & Mitch. 
*Lamprurus Lumachellus, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 12. 
*Ramphomicron Lumachellus, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 10. 
* Augastes lumachellus, Bonap. Rev. et Mag. de Zool. 1854, 
p. 253; Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 46. 


Habitat. Central and Northern Brazil. 


124 


One of those genera which give but little trouble to the ornitho- 
logist is the 
Genus Petasopuora, G. R. Gray, 


all the species having characters in common, while each has its own 
peculiar distinction either in colour or markings. ‘The sexes are 
alike in colour, but the females are always much smaller than the 
males. This is strictly an Andean group, most of the species being 
found in those elevated regions from Mexico in the north to Bolivia 
in the south; one species, the P. serrirostris, inhabits Brazil. 


948. PETASOPHORA SERRIROSTRIS «. . Vol. IV. Pl. CCXXIII. 


Trochilus serrirostris, Vieill. 
janthinotus, Natt. 
petasophorus, Pr. Max., Temm., Jard. 
Ornismya petasophora, Less. 
Grypus? Vieilloti, Steph. 
Colibri crispus, Spix. 
Petasophora serrirostris, Gray, Gould, Bonap. 
Polytmus serrirostris, Gray & Mitch. 
* Trochilus (Lophornis) petasophorus, Tschudi, Consp. p. 37. 
No. 205. 
+. chalcotis, Licht. in Mus. of Berlin. : 
* Petasophora chalcotis, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 13; Id. Troch. 
Enum. p. 11. 
“4 serrirostris, Id. ib. p. 13. 
de erispa, Burm. Th. Bras. tom. ii. p. 335. 
* serrirostris, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 25. 
Petasophora Gouldi, Bonap. (proposed for a smaller bird inhabit- 
ing Bahia). 
Habitat. Brazil, from Minas Geraes to Bahia. 
949. PerasopHora ANAIS...... + « Vol. IV. Pl. CCXXIV. 


Ramphodon Anais, Less. 
Polytmus Anais, Gray & Mitch. 
Colibri anais, Bonap. 
Trochilus thalassinus, Jard. 
Anais, Jard. 
*Petasophora Anais, Bonap. Rev. et Mag. de Zool. 1854, p. 250 ; 
Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 11; Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil 
iii, p. 26. ; 
*Praxilla Anais, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 12. 
Habitat. New Granada and Venezuela. 


950. PETASOPHORA IOLATA, Gould . . Vol. IV. Pl. CCXXV. 


Polytmus iolatus, Gray & Mitch. 
Colibri jolata, Bonap. 
*? Trochilus (Coeligena) Anais, Tschudi, Consp. p. 36, No. 201; 
Id. Faun. Peru. p. 244, No. 4. 
* Praailla iolata, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 13. 
* Petasophora iolata, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 11. 


125 


* Petasophora rhodotis “ Gould,” Saucerotte in Mus. Heinean. 
Wi iolata, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 26. ” 


| Habitat. Ecuador, Peru, and Bolivia. 
251. PerasopHora coRuscANns, Gould . Vol. IV. Pl. CCXXVI. 


Trochilus (Petasophora) coruscans, Gould. 
Petusophora coruscans, Gould. 

_ Polytmus coruscans, Gray & Mitch. 
Colibri coruscans, Bonap. 


Habitat. Unknown. 


I have never seen a second example of this singular bird, which 
departs from the ordinary species, and assimilates somewhat to the 


P. Delphine. 
952, PETASOPHORA THALASSINA «+ + Vol. IV. Pl. CCXXVII. 


Trochilus thalassinus, Swains. 
Polytmus thalassinus, Gray & Mitch. 
Colibri thalassinus, Bonap. 
* Trochilus Anais, Swains. Birds of Brazil, pl.’75. 
* Ornismya Anais, Less. Supp. des Ois.-mou. pg. Se. 
* Ramphodon Anais, Less. Troch. p. 148, pl. 56? 
* Trochilus Anais, Jard. Nat. Lib. Humming Birds, vol. ii. p. 2? 
* Cynanthus thalassinus, Jard. ib. p. 148. 
* Colibris thalassina, Sclat. in Proe. of Zool. Soe. part. xxiv. p. 287. 
*Petasophora thalassina, Bonap. Rev. et Mag. de Zool. 1854, 
p-250; Cab, et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 27; Reichenb. 
Troch. Enum. p. 11. 
* Praxilla thalassina, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 13. 


Habitat. Mexico and Guatemala. 
<The barrancos of the Volcan de Fuego are favourite resorts of 
this species. A specimen obtained at Duedas on the 15th of Sep- 


tember was the only one I saw out on the llano, as the bird is 
usually found in the dense forest.” — Salvin in Ibis, vol. ii. p. 260. 


953. PeTASOPHORA CYANOTIS . . + Vol. IV. Fl. CCX XVII. 


Trochilus cyanotus, Boure. 
Petasophora cyanotus, Gould. 
Polytmus cyanotus, Gray & Mitch. 
Colibri cyunotis, Bonap. 
* Ornismya Anais, Less. Troch. p.151, pl. 57? 
* Praxilla cyanotis, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 13. 
* Petasophora cyanotus, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 11. 
* - cyanotis, Bonap. Rev. et Mag. de Zool. 1854, p. 251 ; 
Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil ii}. p. 26. ; 


Habitat. New Granada and Venezuela. 


954. PerasopHorA DELPHINE « « . Vol. IV. Pl. CCX XIX. 


Ornismya Delphine, Less. 
Polytmus Delphine, Gray & Mitch. 


126 


Colibri delphine, Bonap. 
* Telesiella Delphine, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 13. 
* Petasophora Delphine, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 11. 
eee delphina, Bonap. Rev. et Mag. de Zool. 1854, p.251. 
* Telesilla Delphine, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 27. 


Habitat. The Guianas, Trinidad, Venezuela, Guatemala, New 
Granada, and Ecuador. 


«“ This Humming-Bird seems to have been quite unknown at 
Coban previously to the collection of my specimens. The first was 
shot by my collector, Cipriano Prado, among some Salvie, in one 
of the mountain hollows near Coban. Salvie being in flower in 
November, their blossoms are sought after by nearly every species 
of Humming-Bird near Coban, and this among the rest. It is rare 
even at Coban; and though much sought for by the Indian boys 
in consequence of my offers of reward, but few specimens were 
obtained. 

“Three males to one female appears to be about the proportion 
of the sexes.” —Salvin in Ibis, vol. ii. p. 261. 


There is no one genus among the Trochilide that has more 
sadly puzzled me, and doubtless other ornithologists, than that 
containing the two species known under the specific names of 
virescens and viridissimus (Chrysobronchus virescens and C. viridi- 
caudus of my Plates), no two persons agreeing as to the place 
they should fill in the family. Dr. Cabanis, in his ‘Museum Hei- 


neanum,’ is of opinion that the generic name of Polytmus, proposed 
by Brisson in 1760, is the one under which they should be retained ; 
although I concur in this opinion, I cannot agree with him in 
placing them near to the genus Gilaucis; and I may be open to 
criticism in ranging them here, but I really cannot find a better 
situation for them. I have stated that there are two species of this 
form, but I have some reason to believe there is a third, as I have a 
small specimen collected by M. Warszewicz on the River Magdalena, 
which may prove to be distinet; but until I have further evidence 
that such is the case, I decline to characterize it; independently of 
its smaller size, it has much more white on the tail than any other 
I have seen. : 
Genus Potytmus, Briss. 


The P. virescens and P. viridissimus are the only species yet 
characterized of this genus. ‘They are distinguished by the golden 
hues of their throats. A great similarity exists between the sexes ; 
but the young of P. virescens have reddish-brown breasts, and are 
altogether different in colour from the adults. 


955. PoLYTMUS VIRESCENS. 
Chrysobronchus virescens . . - + + Vok IVuPE LER. 
Trochilus Thaumatias, Linn., Lath., Vieill. 
——— viridescens, Linn. 
virescens, Dumont, Licht., Vieill., Pr. Max. 
chrysobronchus, Shaw, Steph. 


Trochilus viridis, Vieill. 
Ornismya viridis, Less. 
Trochilus chlor oleucurus, Sauc. 
Polytmus chrysobronchus, Gray & Mitch. 
Chrysobronchus virescens, Bonap. 
Leucippus chrysobronchus, Reichenb. 

* Polyimus thaumantias, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 5. 


_ Habitat. Trinidad; Venezuela; and New Granada? 


256. PoLYTMUS VIRIDISSIMUS. 
Chrysobronchus viridicaudus  . . . Vol. IV. Pl. CCXXXI. 


Trochilus viridissimus, Aud. et Vieill. 
Trochilus Theresia, Da Silva. 
* Ornismya viridis, Less. Les Troch. p. 96, pl. 33. 
* Trochilus virescens, Wied, Beitr. iv. p. 107. 
*Amazilia viridissima, Bonap. Gen. Av. tom. i. p. 77; Amazilia, 
sp. 4. 
© Smeragditis viridissima, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 7. 
* Chrysobronchus viridissimus, Bonap. Rev. et Mag. de Zool. 1854, 
252. 
+ Gniaedns viridissimus, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 4, pl. 695. 
figs. 4547-48. 
* Thaumatias viridissimus, Burm. Th. Bras. tom. ii. p. 344. 
* Thaumatias chrysurus, Burm. ib. p. 345. 
* Trochilus viridicaudus, Sauc. MSS. 
* Trochilus prasinus, Licht. in Mus. of Berlin. 
+ Polytmus Theresia, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 5. 


Habitat. The banks of the Amazon, from Para to the confines of 
Peru. I have also received specimens from Demerara. 


I have before stated that it would be impossible to arrange the 
Humming-Birds on the score of affinity ; and I repeat that the vari- 
ous genera are so widely different, and so many connecting forms are 
wanting, that it is quite out of the question to attempt their arrange- 
ment on this ground. It is of little importance, then, where we place 
the bird known under the name of Patagona gigas and distinguished 
from all others by its great size, its ample wings, its sombre colour- 
ing, and by the similarity in the plumage of the two sexes. At 
present the single species which has been characterized, and which 


ranges from Ecuador to the southern parts of Chili, where it isa | 
migrant, is all that is known of this form; but I observe that the | 


Chilian and Ecuadorian specimens differ considerably in size, the | 


Jatter being the largest. 


Genus Paracona, G. R. Gray. 


257. PaATAGONA GIGAS . + + + + Vol ly. bic OCR % XL. 


Trochilus gigas, Vieill., Jard. 
Ornismya tristis, Less. 


Kee 


128 


Cynanthus tristis, Less. 
Ornismya gigantea, D’Orb. et Lafres. 
Patagona gigas, Gray, Bonap., Reichenb. 
Hylocharis gigas, Gray. 
* Hypermetra gigas, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 81. 
* Trochilus gigas, Bridges, Proc. of Zool. Soc. part xi. p. 114; 
Darwin, Zool. of Beagle, part iii. Birds, p. 111. 


Habitat. Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia, and Chile. 


«The American Aloe (Agave Americana) is the only plant this 
bird is ever seen feeding upon in Eeuador.”’—Jameson and Fraser 
in Idzs, vol. i. p. 400. 

“This species,” says Mr. Darwin, “ is common in Central Chile. 
It is a large bird for the delicate family to which it belongs. At 
Valparaiso, in the year 1834, I saw several of these birds in the mid- 
dle of August, and I was informed they had only lately arrived from 
the parched deserts of the north. Towards the middle of Septem- 
ber (the vernal equinox) their numbers were greatly increased. 
They breed in Central Chile, and replace, as I have before said, the 
foreguing species ” (Fustephanus galeritus), “ which migrates south- 
ward for the same purpose. The nest is deep in proportion to its 
width—externally three inches and a half deep, internal depth a 
little under one inch and three quarters, width within one inch and 
two-tenths; mouth slightly contracted. Externally it is formed of 
fine fibrous grass woven together, and attached by one side, and bot- 
tom, to some thin upright twigs ; internally it is thickly lined with 
a felt, formed of the pappus of some composite fower. When on 
the wing, the appearance of this bird is singular. Like others of the 
genus, it moves from place to place with a rapidity which may be 
compared to that of Syrphus among Diptera, and Sphinx among 
Moths; but whilst hovering over a flower, it flaps its wings with a 
very slow and powerful movement, totally different from that vibra- 
tory one, common to most of the species, which produces the hum- 
ming noise. I never saw any other bird, where the force of its 
wings appeared (as in a butterfly) so powerful in proportion to the 
weight of its body. When hovering by a flower, its tail is con- 
stantly expanded and shut like a fan, the body being kept in a nearly 
vertical position. This action appears to steady and support the 
bird, between the slow movements of its wings. Although flying 
from flower to flower in search of food, its stomach generally con- 
tained abundant remains of insects, which I suspect are much more 
the object of its search than honey is. The note of this species, 
like that of nearly the whole family, is extremely shrill.’— Darwin, 
Zooloyy of the Beagle, part iii. Birds, p. 111. 

“The Troch. gigas is found in all the central provinces of 
Chile: it is seen about Valparaiso during the spring and summer 
months, feeding on the flowers of Pouwrretia coarctata and Lobelia 
polyphylla in preference to others. It generally builds its nest near 
a little rivulet, frequently on a solitary. twig or branch over the water ; 
the nest is beautifully constructed, and is composed of moss and the 


129 


down of a species of Gnaphalium. _ Eggs white; iris dark brown. 
Catches flies.’"— Bridges in Proc. Zool. Soc. pt. vi. p.- 114. 


The forms to which we now proceed are mostly of large size, have 
straight lengthened bills, and are very gorgeously coloured. These 
straight and prolonged bills are in unison with the flora with which 
they are associated, particularly such deep tubular flowers as those of 
the genera Brugmansia, Lepageria, Nematanthus, Tacsonia, Alstro- 
meria, Dipladenia, &e. 

The first genus is that of Docimastes. Of this remarkable form, 
the single species known stands alone among Humming-Birds for the 
great length of its bill. Nature here appears to have carried the de- 
velopment of this organ to its maximum ; and how wonderfully is it 
adapted for exploring the lengthened tubular flowers from which the 
bird obtains its insect food ! 


Genus Docirmastss, Gould. 
(Aoxtpafw, exploro.) 


Generic characters. | 
Male.—Bill of extraordinary length, exceeding that of the head 


and body, and inclining upwards; wings long and pointed; tad 
moderately long and forked ; tarsi short and partially clothed ; feet 
small; Aind toe shorter than the middle toe ; face and gorget dull ; 
sides of the chest luminous. 

Female.—Unadorned. 


258. DOCIMASTES ENSIFERUS . « - Vol. IV. Pl. CCXXXIHI. 


Ornismya ensifera, Boiss. 
Trochilus Derbianus, Fras. 
Mellisuga ensifera, Gray & Mitch. 


* Docimastes Derbyanus, Licht. in Mus. Berlin. 
* — ensifera, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil ii. p. 77-- 


Habitat. Columbia and Ecuador. 


Specimens from the neighbourhood of Bogota differ from those 
received from Quito in being of much smaller size; but I consider 


romaine 


these as mere races of one and the same species, for I can see no | 


characters on which a specific distinction could be founded. 


The next species is interesting for its great size, the elegance of 
its proportions, and the beauty and harmony of its colours. This 


new and extraordinary bird I have named Hugenia Imperatriz in 
honour of the Empress of the French. 


Genus Eveenta, Gould. 
(Eugenia, nom. propr.) 


Generic characters. : gee 8 
Male.—Bill straight or slightly mclimng upwards, longer than 


the head; wings long; primaries rigid ; tail long and forked, the 


130 


feathers narrow and unyielding ; ¢arsi partially clothed ; feet small ; 
hind toe long ; nail moderate ; face luminous. Female.—Unadorned. 


259. Eveenia IMPERATRIX. .. - Vol. IV. Pl. CCXXXIV. 
Habitat. Ecuador. 


“‘ Professor Jameson’s specimens of this fine bird were obtained in 
the neighbourhood of Auca, on the road to Nanegal, at about 6000 
or 7000 feet elevation. They were feeding on the Alstremeria, 
Dature not being found in that locality.” —Jameson and Fraser in 
Ibis, vol. 1. p. 400. : 


The members of the genus Helianthea, distinguished by their star- 
like frontlets and luminous under surfaces, appear to range next to 
the preceding. Three of them (namely, H. typica, H. Bonaparter, 
and H. Kos) are quite typical ; while the H. Lutetze and H. violifera 
differ somewhat in their colouring, the lower part of the body of 
the two latter species not being luminous, while they assimilate in all 
other respects. Dr. Reichenbach’s separation of the H. typica and 
H. Bonaparte into a separate genus (Hypochrysia) cannot, in my 
opinion, for a moment be admitted. 


Genus Heviantuea, Gould. 


(“HAws, sol, et avOos, flos.) 

Generic characters. 

Male.—Bill long, straight and cylindrical ; wings moderately long 
and powerful ; ¢azl of medium size and slightly forked when closed ; 
tarsi extremely short and clothed with feathers; feet very small ; 
hind toe the shortest ; forehead and under surface luminous. 

Female.—Destitute of luminous colouring. 

The members of this genus frequent the Andes for at least eight 
degrees on each side of the equator. 


260. HELIANTHEA TYPICA . ..,.. . Vol. IV. Pl. CCXXXV. 


Ornismya helianthea, Less. 
Mellisuga helianthea, Gray & Mitch. 
Helianthea typica, Bonap., Cabanis. 
*Trochilus porphyrogaster, Licht. in Mus. of Berlin. 


Habitat. New Granada. Is exceedingly common in the neigh- 
bourhood of Bogota. A large race occurs near Pamplona. 


261. HeviantHeaA Bonaparter . . Vol. IV. Pl. CCXXXVI. 


Ornismya Bonapartei, Boiss., Bourc. 
Trochilus aurigaster, Lodd. 
Mellisuga Bonapartei, Gray & Mitch. 
Helianthea Bonapartii, Bonap., Cabanis. 
* Hypochrysa Bonaparti, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p.9; Id. Troch. 
Enum. p. 6, pl. 739. figs. 4683-84. 
*Trochilus chrysogaster, Licht. in Mus. Berlin. 


Habitat. New Granada. Examples frequently occur in collections 
from Bogota. -— 


131 


262. Hentanruea Eos, Gould . . Vol. IV. Pl. CCXXXVII. 
Mellisuga eos, Gray & Mitch. 


Helianthea eos, Bonap. 
Hypochrysia eos, Reichenb. 


Habitat. Paramos da los Conejos, near Merida in Columbia. 
263. Hewianruea Luretia . . . Vol. IV. Pl. CCXXXVIII.. 


Trochilus Lutetie, Delatt. et Boure. 

Mellisuga lutetie, Gray & Mitch. 

Helianthea lutetie, Bonap., Cabanis. 

Habitat. Popayan and Ecuador. Professor Jameson and Mr. 
Fraser state that “This bird is found in the valleys of Lloa and 
Pelogalli, but not nearer Quito.”’—Ibis, vol. i. p. 400. 


264. HELIANTHEA VIOLIFERA, Gould Vol. IV. PI. COXXXEX. 


Trochilus violifer, Gould. 
Mellisuga violifera, Gray & Mitch. 
Helianthea violifera, Bonap. 
— violifera, Bonap., Cabanis. 
Habitat. “In proving Chulimani au Cordilera”’ in Bolivia (War- 
szewicz). 


Genus HretiotryeHa, Gould. 


(“HAuos, sol, et TPUOI, luxuria. ) 

Generic characters. 

Male.—Bill straight and of the same length as the head; wings 
rather long; tail long and forked; tarsi partially clothed; feet 
small; hind toe rather shorter than the middle one; forehead and 
throat luminous. 

Female.—Destitute of luminous colouring on the throat. 

The members of this genus, two in number, differ from those of 
Heliangelus in the absence of any band of white on the chest and in 
having a lengthened and deeply forked tail. 


265. HEeLIoTRYPHA PARZUDAKI. . . .; Vol. IV. Pl. CCXL. 


Ornismya Parzudaki, De Longuem. et Parz. 
Mellisuga Parzudaki, Gray & Mitch. 
Heliangelus parzudaki, Bonap. 
Heliotrypha parzudakii, Bonap. 
Trochilus exortis, Fras. 
Parzudakia dispar, Reichenb. 
* Ramphomicron dispar, Reich. Troch. Enum. p. 10. 
*Trochilus lasiopygus, Licht. in Mus. Berlin. 
* Heliotryphon Parzudakii, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 74. 


Habitat. New Granada; and Ecuador, where it is rare. 
266. HexiorryPHA VIOLA, Gould . . . VOWIV Ply CORLL 
Heliangelus viola, Gould. 


132 


* Parzudakia viola, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 12. 
*Ramphomicron viola, Id. Troch. Enum. p. 10. 
* Heliotryphon viola, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 74. 


Habitat. Ecuador. 


Genus HELIANGELUS, Gould. 


("Hrwos, sol, et dyyedos, angelus.) 


Generic characters. 

Male.— Bill straight, about the same length as the head, and 
eylindrical ; wings somewhat powerful ; ¢ail rather round in form 
and of medium size; feet moderately strong: hind toe and nail the 
same length as the middle toe and nail; gorget luminous, bounded 
below by a crescent of white. 

Female.—Destitute of luminous colouring. 

This is perhaps a better-defined genus than any other of those mto 
which the Andean groups of Humming-Birds have been divided. Its 
characteristics are a moderately long bill surmounted by a band of 
lustrous colour on the forehead, and a deep luminous gorget sepa- 
- rated from the general colour of the body by a semicircular band of 
white. Like the Helianthee and Heliotryphe the species of this 
form range along the Andes on both sides of the equator. 

Dr. Reichenbach, in my opinion, went far out of his way when he 
separated these birds into three genera—Trochilus, Anactoria, and 
Diotima. Had he carefully studied the group from actual speci- 
mens, he would have seen that this was unnecessary. 


267. HeniaNGeLus Cuariss#. . . . Vol. IV. Pl. CCXLII. 


Ornismia Clarisse, De Longuem. 

Mellisuga Clarisse, Gray & Mitch. 

Heliangelus Clarisse and Clarissa, Bonap. 

Anactoria Clarissa, Reichenb. 
*Trochilus Clarissa, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 10. 
* Heliangelus Clarisse, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 75. 
* Anactoria Libussa, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 12; Id. Troch. 

Enum. p. 10. 


Habitat. The high lands of New Granada. Plentiful in collections 
from Bogota. 
268. Hexiance us stropaianvs, Gould Vol. IV. Pl. CCXLIII. 


Trochilus strophianus, Gould. 
Mellisuga strophiana, Gray & Mitch. 
Heliangelus strophianus, Bonap. 
Anactoria Strophiana, Reichenb. 
*Trochilus Strophiana, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 10. 


Habitat. Ecuador. 
269. Henianceuus Spencer. . . . Vol. IV. Pl. CCXLIV. 


Trochilus Spencet, Boure. 


SS 


133 


Mellisuga Spencei, Gray & Mitch. 
Heliangelus Spencei, Bonap. 
Diotima Spencei, Reichenb. 
*Trochilus Spencei, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 10. 


Habitat. The ranges of Sierra Nevada de Merida in New Granada. 


270. HELIANGELUS AMETHYSTICOLLIS . Vol. IV. Pl. CCXLV. 


- Orthorhynchus amethysticollis, D’Orb. et Lafres. 
Mellisuga amethysticollis, Gray & Mitch. 
Trochilus amethysticollis, Tschudi. 
Lampornis amethysticollis, Tschudi. 
Heliangelus amethysticollis, Bonap., Cabanis. 
Anactoria amethysticollis, Reichenb. 
*Trochilus amethysticollis, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 10. 


Habitat. Peru. 


271, Heuiancecus Mavors, Gould. . Vol. IV. Pl. CCXLVI. 


Mellisuga Mavors, Gray & Mitch. 
Heliangelus mavors, Bonap. 
Trochilus Mavors, Reichenb. 
*T'rochilus Mavors, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 10. 


Habitat. The Paramos of Portachuela and Zumbador in New 
Granada. 


That almost terra.incognita, so far at least as its zoological produc- 
tions are concerned, the Andes of La Paz, has given us, through the 
researches of M. Warszewicz, one of the most distinct as well as one of 
the most beautiful forms yet discovered among the T rochilide. This 
remarkable bird is the type of my genus Diphlogena, to which I have 
since added a second species under the name of D. Aurora, with a 
mark of reservation in case it may prove to be the female of D. Iris ; 
for the present, however, I regard it as distinct. 


‘ Genus DirenLocana, Gould. 
(&-, duplex, et proyatyvos, flammeus.) 


Generic Characters. ; 
Male.—Bill straight and longer than the head; wing very long 
and pointed ; tail lengthened and deeply forked; tarsi short and 
partially clothed ; feet small; hind toe short ; natls moderately long 
and straight ; crown decorated with several luminous colours. 

Female.—Unknown. 


272. Dreuiocana Iris, Gould vec wee Ode 1 COXLVII. 
Helianthea Iris, Gould, Bonap. 


Habitat. Andes of Bolivia, between Sorata and Illinani. The 
locality given me by M. Warszewicz is the province of Huanca- 
bamba au Cordilera Solaio, 9000 feet. 


134 


f 


273. DipHLoGH@Nna AURORA, Gina . Vol. IV. Pl. CCXLVIII. 


*Hypochrysia Aurora, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 9. 

*Coeligena Warszewizii, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 23. 

* Coeligena Warszewiceti, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 4, pl. 690. 
fig. 4526. 


Habitat. Peru; locality the same as D. Iris. 


Dr. Reichenbach’s specific name of Warszewiczi must, I believe, 
give place to that of Diphlogena Aurora, unless his name was pro- 
posed prior to the 12th of April, 1853, when I read my paper on this 
and other new species before the meeting of the Zoological Society of 
poe as reported in the ‘Athenzeum’ of the 16th of the same 
month. 


The form which appears to me to range next in point of affinity is 
that of Clytolema. The two members of this genus, unlike their 
predecessors, which are from the Andes, are natives of the low coun- 
tries,—one, the C. rubinea, being found in Brazil, and, so far as we 
yet know, confined to the most eastern parts of that country; the 
other, the beautiful C. aurescens, is an inhabitant of the forests of 
the upper part of the Rivers Madeira and Negro. 


Genus CiyTroLama, Gould. 
(KXvros, celebris, et Naruds, guttur.) 


Generic characters. 

Male.—Bill straight and rather longer than the head; wings 
moderately long and pointed ; ¢ai/ rather short, andvery slightly, tarsi 
partially clothed; feet strong; hind toe and nail shorter than the 
fore toes and nails; crown and gorget luminous. 

Female.—Destitute of any fine colour. 


274, CLYTOLEMA RUBINEA . . . . Vol. IV. Pl. CCXLIX. 


Mellisuga Brasiliensis, gutture rubro, Briss. 

Trochilus rubineus, Gmel., Lath., Vieill., Cab. 

Ornismya rubinea, Less. 

Mellisuga rubinea, Gray & Mitch. 

Heliomaster rubineus, Bonap. 

Trochilus obscurus, Gmel., Lath. (Cabanis). 
* — ruficaudatus, Vieill. Nouv. Dict. d Hist. Nat. tom. vii. 

p- 370, tom. xxii. p. 429. 
*Cynanthus rubineus, Jard. Nat. Lib. Humming Birds, vol. ii. 
. 146. 

* Heliodowa rubinea, Reich. Troch. Enum. p. 9, pl. 744. fig. 470-69. 
* Calothorax rubinea, Burm. Th. Bras. i. p. 340. 


Habitat. The eastern portions of Brazil; common at Rio de 
Janeiro. 
275. CiryroLama? AURESCENS, Gould . . Vol. IV. Pl. CCL. 
Trochilus (Lampornis) ‘aurescens, Gould. 


135 


Polytmus aurescens, Gray & Mitch. 

Lampornis aurescens, Bonap. 

Margarochrysis aurescens, Reichenb. 

Campylopterus aurescens, Bonap. 

Habitat. The forests bordering the Rivers Madeira, Upper Amazon, 
and Negro. 


_ By some Trochilidists it may be thought that this species should 
form the type of a distinct genus; but after a careful comparison I 
believe that I have placed it in its right situation; at the same time 
I admit that there is some little doubt on the subject. 


{ next proceed to a group of birds of considerable size, with 
lengthened straight bills, and the plumage and markings of which 
yender them very conspicuous—the prevailing colours being black 
and white, relieved by blue and other tints on the crown ; they have 
small and very delicate feet, the colours of which are either rosy or 
white. I consider them to constitute a very distinct section of the 
Trochilidee, and I have much pleasure in adopting for them the 
generic appellation of Bourcierta proposed by the late Prince Charles 
Bonaparte. All the known species are from the Andes, over which 
they are spread from the southern part of Peru to the northern part 
of New Granada. 


Genus BourcreriaA, Bonap. 


As a typical example of the form, I commence with— 


276. BOURCIERIA TORQUATA . «+ + + > Vol. IV. Pl. CCLI. 


Ornismya torquata, Boiss. 
Mellisuga torquata, Gray & Mitch. 
Bourcieria torquata, Bonap., Reichenb. 
* Homophania torquata, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 79. 
Habitat. Columbia. Common in the temperate regions round 
Bogota. 
277, BourcreRia FuLGIDIGULA, Gould . Vol. IV. Pl. CCLII. 
Homophania fulgidigula, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein, Theil iu. p. 79, 
note. 
Habitat. Ecuador. 


278. BOURCIERIA INSECTIVORA. 


*Trochilus (Lampornis) insectivorus, Tschudi, Consp. p. 38, No. 
211; Id. Faun, Per. p. OAS) t 28, 1. ls 

I observe that M. Cabanis has placed the T. insectivorus of 
Tschudi among the synonyms of B. torquata ; but, having had 
Tschudi’s type specimen sent to me from Neuchatel, I am not satis- 
fied as to its identity with that species. The specimen referred to 
seems to me to be the young of some bird of which we have not yet 
seen the adult. I therefore retain the name in my list; but of course 


136 


do not figure it. It appears to me to offer an alliance to the 
B. Conradi. 


Habitat. Peru. 
279. BourcreriA Conrapbit. . «. « ~ Vol. IV. Pl. CCLIII. 


Trochilus Conradii, Boure. 
Mellisuga Conradii, Gray & Mitch. 
Conradinia Conradi, Reichenb. 
Bourcieria Conrad, Bonap., Reichenb. 
* Helianthea Conradi, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 80, note. 


Habitat. Pamplona in New Granada. 


280. Bourciertia Inca, Gould. . . ~. Vol. IV. Pl. CCLIV. 
_ Bourcieria Inca, Gould, Bonap., Reichenb. 
* Homophania Inca, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 79. 


Habitat. Province of Coroico in Bolivia; 6000 or 8000 feet (War- 
szewicz). 


Genus Lampropyeta, Reichend. 


The members of this genus (all figured in the work under the 
generic appellation of Celigena) bear a general resemblance to the 
last as regards their size and the lengthened and straight form of 
their bills ; but their style of colouring is very different, and, however 
much some naturalists may dissent from the idea of colour being re- 
garded as a generic character, I do think that it is of no little im- 
portance in this group of birds ; for I find that every distinct section 
or genus is distinguished by some peculiar style of plumage and 
colouring common to all the species of which it is composed, and not 
found in the others. Thus the members of the present genus all 
bear a plumage of a rather dull or sombre character with the excep- 
tion of the lower part of the back, where it is luminous ; but, as is the 
case with the Agleactines, this luminous colouring is only to be seen 
when viewed from behind. All the known species are found among 
the Andes, both on the northern and southern sides of the equator. 


281. LAMPROPYGIA C@LIGENA. 


Complies ty pica. . hei 5 5 ee hs VON AV gly We 


Ornismya ceeligena, Less. 
Mellisuga ceeligena, Gray & Mitch. 
Celigena typica, Bonap. 
*Lampornis celigena, Jard. Nat. Lib. Humming-Birds, vol. ii. p. 
roa, 
* Ceeligena typica, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 3, pl. 686. fig. 4515, 
*Lampropygia celigena, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 78, 


Habitat. New Granada. 


: In my account of this species, which is common ih the neighbour- 
| hood of Bogota, I stated that the Bolivian birds which appeared to 
| be identical with it are much larger in size and darker in colour, and 


137 


that I thought it probable that they would prove to be distinet and 
undescribed ; I still entertain the same opinion. I therefore take this 
opportunity of assigning to this southern representative a specific ap- 
pellation, but do not consider it necessary to give a figure of it. 


282. Lampropyera Boxrviana, Gould. 


This bird bears a general resemblance to the L. eceligena, but differs 
in being of a much darker colour on the head and neck, and in having 
the tail dark olive-brown washed with bronze in lieu of light bronzy- 
brown ; the lower part of the back also is more richly coloured, the 
crescentic markings of green showing still greater lustre when viewed 
from behind. 

Total length 53 inches ; bill 13 ; wing 34; tail 24; tarsi }. 

Habitat. Bolivia. 


233. LAMPROPYGIA PURPUREA. 3 
Ceeligena purpurea, Gould . . . = - Vol. IV. Pl. CCLVI. 


* Ocligena ——, Bonap. Consp. Gen. Av. tom. i. p. 73, Coeligena, 
sp. 2. 

* Celigena purpurea, Reich. Troch. Enum. p. 3, pl. 753. figs. 4727, 
4728. 

* Lampropygia purpurea, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 71, 
note. 


Habitat. Popayan. 


984. LAMPROPYGIA PRUNELLEI. 
Ceeligena Prunelli . - - + + + + Vol. IV. Pl. CCLVII. 


Trochilug Prunelli, Bourc. 
Mellisuga Prunellei, Gray & Mitch. 
Homophania Prunellii, Reichenb. 
Bourcieria prunelli, Bonap. 
* Bourcieria Prunelli, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 7, pl. 750. figs. 
4721, 4722. 
* Homophania Prunelli, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 79. 
Habitat. Andes of New Granada. Common in collections from 
Bogota. 


285. Lampropyei1a WILSON. 
Coligena Wilsoni.. . 2). . 2» Vol. IV. Pl. CCLVIIL. 
Trochilus Wilsoni, Delatt. et Boure. 
Mellisuga Wilsoni, Gray & Mitch. 
Bourcieria Wilsoni, Bonap., Reichenb. 
Lampropygia Wilsoni, Reichenb., Cabanis. 
Habitat. Ecuador. 


‘There must be some error when M. Bourcier states that he killed 
this species at an elevation of 10,000 feet, and in Nono, which lies at 
about 9000 feet. The bird belongs strictly to the warmer countries, 


138 


such as Nanegal, which is only about 4000 feet in altitude.’’— 
Jameson and Fraser in Ibis, vol. 1. p. 400. 


A group rather than a genus next claims our attention; for two or 
three very well-marked divisions occur among the birds I have 
figured under the generic name of Heliomaster. Unlike the last, 
which are-confined within certain limits, these birds are widely spread, 
some of them over Mexico and Central America, and others over 
Venezuela, and even further south than the latitude of Rio de Janeiro 
in Brazil. 

The members of this section of the Trochilide are of rather large 
size, have long straight bills, lengthened wings, and a structure 
admirably adapted for aérial progression. The males are mostly 
clothed with fine colours on the crown and throat. 

The species of the 


Genus HetiomastTer, Bonap., 


as now restricted, are at least five or six in number, and four of 
them are inhabitants of Central America or countries north of the 
Isthmus of Panama. Their short, nearly square tails, the outer 
feathers of which, together with their under tail-coverts, are spotted 
with white, render them very conspicuous. ; 


286. HeELIOMASTER LONGIROSTRIS. . . Vol. IV. Pl. CCLIX. 
Trochilus longirostris, Vieill. 


superbus, Shaw, Lath., Temm., Jard. 
Ornismya superba, Less. 
Long-billed Humming-Bird, Lath. 
Mellisuga longirostris, Gray & Mitch. 
Heliomaster longirostris, Bonap., Reich., Cabanis. 
*Selasphorus longirostris, Reichenb., Troch. Enum. p. 11. 


Habitat. Trinidad. 


287. HELIOMASTER STUARTA, Lawr. 


* Heliomaster longirostris, Sclat. in Proc. of Zool. Soc. part xxv. 
p- 16. 

*# —— Stuarte, Lawr. Ann. Lyc. Nat. Hist. in New York, 
April 9, 1860. 


Habitat. New Granada; the neighbourhood of Bogota. 


Mr. G. N. Lawrence, of New York, considers the bird from 
Bogota to be distinct from the Heliomaster longirostris of Trinidad, 
and has assigned to it the distinctive appellation of Stuarte, in 
honour of a most estimable lady, the wife of R. L. Stuart, Esq., 
, of New York. 

For my own part, I have always regarded the Bogota and Tri- 
nidad birds as one and the same; but Mr. Lawrence has ever 
maintained that they are distinct ; and on the day when these re- 
marks were written I received from him a copy of the first part 
of his paper entitled ‘‘ Catalogue of a Collection of Birds made in 


139 


New Granada, by James McLennan, Esq., of New York,”’ in which, 
referring to his Heliomaster Stuarte, he says :—* Since describing 
this species, I have had an opportunity of examining seven other 
specimens from Bogota. I find the bills of these to be quite as long 
as those of H. longirostris; but they are much stouter, and the 
base of the bill is very broad and bare of feathers, whereas in longi- 
rostris the bill is comparatively narrow at the base, and the feathers 
extend quite forward on the bill. These differences were constant 
in an equal number of each species.” 

Whether the birds are really distinct or mere local varieties, time 
and the acquisition of a larger number of specimens must determine. 
I have in my own collection two specimens of another bird of this 
form, which bear a very general resemblance both in size and mark- 
ings; but the crown, instead of being bluish green, is positive blue. 
So decided is this colour, that I have no hesitation in saying that, if 
so slight a difference is allowed to separate the Bogotan and Trini- 
dadian birds, these also must be regarded as belonging to a distinct 
species, and the term Selateri, which has been proposed by Dr. Caba- 
nis, be used for them. I have two very fine males of this bird in fully 
adult plumage, killed by M. Warszewicz in Costa Rica; but in what 
particular locality, is unknown to me. Besides the Costa-Rican bird, 
I have another, still more different, from Southern Mexico, a most 
charming specimen, killed by M. Montes de Oca. This beautiful 
bird also bears a general resemblance in colour and markings to 
those immediately preceding, but is distinguished from all of them 
by its delicate light-green metallic crown. For this new species I 
propose the name of pallidiceps. 

If this little section be found to be composed of four distinct 
birds, the species will stand thus :—H. Jongirostris of Trinidad and 
the adjacent portions of the continent; H. Stwarte of Bogota ; 
H. Sclateri of Costa Rica; and H. pallidiceps of Guatemala and 
Mexico. ; 


288. HELIOMASTER Scratert, Cabanis. 
* Heliomaster Sclateri, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil ii. p. 54, 
March 30, 1860. 


Habitat. Costa Rica. 


239. HELIOMASTER PALLIDICEPS, Gould. 


Crown of the head shining pale green, much paler than in H. don- 
girostris; chin black ; gorget purplish red, separated from the ear- 
coverts by a distinct mark of white; upper surface bronzy green ; 
two centre tail-feathers wholly green, the next on each side green 
tipped with black; the three outer feathers green at the base, then 
black, and a spot of pure white at the tip, the white spot becoming 
less from the outer one, until on the third it is amere speck ; wings 
purplish brown ; chest and centre of the abdomen grey; flanks 
bronzy green ; under tail-coverts pale green, tipped with white. 

Total length 32 inches; bill 12; wing 23; tail 13; tarsi up 


Habitat. Mexico and Guatemala. 


140 


“ The white sides and the white spot on the back show very con- 
spicuously as this bird rests on its perch.”’—Salvin in Ibis, vol. ii. 
p. 264. ; 

290. HetiomAsTeR CONSTANTI 18) an OO ee COE, 

Ornismya Constanti, Delatt. 

Habitat. Guatemala, and Costa Rica. 


291. HeLIoMAsTER LEOCADIA. 
Heliomaster pinicola, Gould . . . . Vol. IV. Pl. CCLXI. 


Trochilus Leocadie, Boure. Ann. des Sci. Nat. de Lyon, tom. iv. 
S852. 


Habitat. Mexico. 


Genus LeripoLarRynx, Reich. 


This form, of which the single species known has received the 
above generic appellation, differs in many particulars from the pre- 
ceding: the bill is less elongated and not so straight, while the tail 
is decidedly forked ; independently of which, the gular mark is very 
different, the entire throat being luminous, while in all the species of 
Heliomaster the chin is black. 


292. LePIDOLARYNX MESOLEUCUS. 
Heliomaster mesoleucus . . . . . Vol. IV. Pl. CCLXII. 


Trochilus mesoleucus, Temm. 
— longirostris, Natt. 
~ sguamosus, 'Termm. 
mystacinus, Vieill. 
Ornismya Temminckit, Less. 
mesoleuca, Less. 
Mellisuga mesoleuca, Steph. 
squamosa, Steph. 
melanoleuca, Gray & Mitch. 
Heliomaster mesoleucus, Bonap. 
*Lepidolarynx mesoleucus, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 13. 
*Selasphorus (Lepidolarynx) mesoleucus, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. 
pers 
*Ornithomyia mesoleuca, Bonap. in Rev. et Mag. de Zool. 1854, 
. 251. 
Mletinnntater squamosus, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 53. 
*Calothorax mesoleucus, Burm. Th. Bras. ii. p. 339, 1. 
*Trochilus mystacinus, Vieill. MSS. 


Habitat. Brazil. 


Genus CALLIPERIDIA, Reich. 


The Calliperidia Angele offers a still further departure from the 
true Heliomasters ; for it has even a shorter bill than the last, while 
its tail is much more deeply forked. It is by far the finest species 
yet discovered. Its entire body is clothed in glittering colours, and 


14] 


the bird itself must be seen and examined to obtain an idea of its 
beauty. The female, on the other hand, has the under surface of 
the body smoky grey, differing in this respect from all the others. 


293. CaLLIPERIDIA ANGELA. 
. Heliomaster Angele . . . . . . Vol. IV. Pl. CCLXII. 


Ornismya Angele, Less. 
_ Heliomaster angela, Bonap. 
*Calliperidia Angelae, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 12. 
*Calliphlox Angelae, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 10. 
*Ornithomyia angela, Bonap. Rev. et Mag. de Zool. 1854, p. 251. 


Habitat. Buenos Ayres and Tucuman. 


A single specimen of a Humming-Bird, somewhat allied to the last 
genus, was killed by M. Warszewicz on the sides of the Volcano of 
Chiriqui. It possesses so many remarkable characters that I was 
obliged, without a moment’s hesitation, to assign to it a new generic 
appellation, that of Oreopyra. Unfortunately the specimen was so 
much injured by shot that I had much difficulty in giving a correct 
delineation of it. 


Genus Orropyra, Gould. 
(Opos, mons, et wip, ignis.). 
Generic characters. 
Male.— Bill longer than the head, straight, or very slightly arched ; 
wings long and rigid; ¢ail moderately long and forked; ¢arsé 
clothed ; feet rather small ; gorget snow-white. 


294. Ornropyra LEeucaspis, Gould . . Vol. IV. Pl. CCLXIV. 
Habitat. Volcano of Chiriqui, 9000 to 10,000 feet (Warszewicz.) 


So different are the three birds found on the island of Juan Fer- 
nandez, that it would not involve a great stretch of impropriety to 
assign to each of them a separate generic appellation ; I shall, how- 
ever, retain them all under the name of Hustephanus. On an exa- 
mination of the plates of the three species it will be seen how re- 
markably they differ in size, colour, and markings. I consider it a 
very singular fact connected with the family of Humming-Birds, that 
three species should be found on an island so distant from the main- 
land, and that two of them should be confined to this isolated spot, 
surrounded as it is by the wide waters of the Pacific Ocean. 


Genus Euvstepuanus, Reichenb. 


095. EusrepHanus Gatertrus . . ~ Vol. IV. Pl. CCLXV. 
Trochilus galeritus, Mol., Lath., Buff., Sonn., Vieill. 
Mellisuga Kingu, Vig. 
Ornismya sephanoides, Less. et Garn. 
Trochilus sephanoides, Jard. 


142 


Trochilus forficatus, Gould. 
—_——— flammifrons, Lyell. 
Mellisuga galerita, Gray & Mitch. 
Sephanoides galerita, Bonap. 
*Sephanoides Kingi, Gray, List of Gen. of Birds, p. 19. 
* Hustephanus galeritus, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 14; Id. Troch. 
Enum. p. 11; Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 76. 


Habitat.. Chili and Juan Fernandez. 
«‘ Found about Valparaiso in abundance in the months of August, 


September, and October.”’—Bridges in Proc. of Zool. Soc. part. xi. 
p- 115. 


296. Eusreruanus Sroxest . . . - Vol. IV. Pl. CCLXVI. 
Trochilus Stokesi, King, Less., Jard. 
Mellisuga Stokesi, Gray & Mitch. 
Sephanoides stokesi, Bonap. 
*Thaumaste Stokesii, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 14; Id. Troch. 
Enum. p. 12. 
*Eustephanus Stokesi, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 75. 


Habitat. Juan Fernandez. 
997, EustepHANUS Fernanvensts . Vol. IV. Pl. CCLXVII. 


Trochilus Fernandensis, King. 
Ornismya cinnamomea, Gerv. 
Robinson, Less. 


Mellisuga Fernandensis, Gray & Mitch, 
Sephanoides fernandensis, Bonap. 
*Eustephanus Fernandensis, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 14; Id. 
Troch. Enum. p. 11; Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil ii. p. 76. 


Habitat. Juan Fernandez. 


The 


Genus Poxotama, Reichend., 


is composed of two Andean species, distinguished by their sombre 
colouring ; for although both have a luminous gular patch, and one 
of them a glittering mark on the centre of the crown, the brilliancy 
of these markings is not so great as usual, and their tails are coloured 
unlike those of any other group. 


298. PomoLama RuBINOipES. . . Vol. IV. Pl. CCLXVIII. 


Trochilus rubinoides, Bourc. et Muls. 
Mellisuga rubinotdes, Bonap. 
Heliomaster rubinotdes, Bonap. 
Clytolema rubinoides, Bonap. 
Phaiolaima rubinoides, Reichenb. 
*Heliodoxa rubinoides, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 6, pl. 743. 
figs. 4704-5. 
Habitat. New Granada. Frequently sent to Europe from Bogota. 


143 


299. Puoxotama AiQuaToRIALis, Gould Vol. IV. Pl. CCLXIX. 


Pheolema rubinoides, Sclat. 
equatorialis, Gould, Sclat. 


Habitat. Ecuador. 


Genus Errocnemis, Reichenb. 


The conspicuous tufts of feathers with which the legs of the 
Eriocnemides are clothed is a feature both novel and peculiar; and 
as it is not to be foundin any other group of birds, they are thereby 
rendered especially singular. In some these powder-puff-like deco- 
rations are white, in others brown and white, and in one jet black. 
All the species are confined to that portion of the Andes which is 
bounded on the north by New Granada, and on the south by 
Bolivia. 

It is not to be supposed that the minor distinctive characters which 
exist among the many species of this group should have passed un- 
noticed by ornithologists; on the contrary, they have attracted the 
notice of more than one writer, and the birds which were all for- 
merly included in the genus Eriopus or Eriocnemis have received 
the subgeneric titles of Hngyete, Threptria, Phemonoé, Aline, 
Luciania, Mosqueria, Derbyomia, &c.,—a tolerable division for the 
genus first established by me in 184:7, under the name of Eriopus. I 
shall now give my own views on the subject, and point out those 
which I consider to be natural divisions. The first, then, is the well- 


known Z. cupreiventris, with which I associate the &. Lsaacsoni, the 


E. Luciani and the EH. Mosquera. In all these the sexes are alike 
in colour. The next division comprises &. vestita and E. nigrivestis, 
as they both have a brilliant patch of feathers on the throat and 
the lower part of the back and the upper tail-coverts, exceedingly 
luminous; and their females are somewhat different and less brilliant 
in colour. The &. Godini and FE. J’ Orbignyi form another little 
section; but we really know so little respecting these species, that 
nothing can be said with certainty as to their females. The black- 
puffed £. Derb*anus stands alone, and a rare and very beautiful 
bird it is. The #. Aline is distinguished from all the rest by the 
glittering green of its face and under surface; it is by far the smallest 
species of the genus, while it has the largest puffs; and the female, 
although bearing a general resemblance to the male, is far less 
brilliant. The members of the next section are very sombre in 
their colouring, as will be seen on reference to the plates on which 
they are represented: they are E. squamata, E. lugens, and E. 
Aurelie. Ornithologists may please themselves about adopting 
generic terms for these minute divisions ; but, for myself, I have 
kept them all under that of Hriocnemis, and still feel inclined to 
do so. They all possess the important character of the puff leg, 
and they are remarkably alike as to the amount of this peculiar 
ornamentation. 
300. ERICCNEMIS CUPREIVENTRIS 

Vol. IV. Pls: CCLXX., CCLXXI. 

Trochilus cupreiventris, Fras. 
L2 


144 


Ornismya vestita 2, Longuem. 
— maniculata, Less. ? 


Hylocharis cupreoventris, Gray & Mitch. 
Eriopus cupreiventris, Bonap. 


Eriopus simplex, Gould. 
Eriocnemis simplex, Gould, Bonap., Reichenb. 


* Phemonoé cupriventris, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 9. 
* Friocnemis cupriventris, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 6, pl. 729, 


figs. 4668-69. 
* Friocnemis cupreiventris, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p.73. 


Habitat. The Andes in New Granada. 


I now believe that the bird I have called Eriocnemis simplex is 
merely a dark variety of the Z. eupreiventris. Such varieties do now 
and then occur with other species of the family; the cause I can- 
not attempt to explain. 

801. Ertocnemis IsAAcsoni Vol. IV. Pl. CCLXXII. 


Ornysmia Isaacsoni, Parz. 

Hylocharis Isaacsoni, Gray & Mitch. 

Eriocnemys isaacsoni, Bonap. 

Phemonoé Isaacsoni, Reichenb. 
*Eriocnemis Isaacsoni, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 6, pl. 761. 

fig. 4700. 

Halitat. New Granada. 

I have never seen any other than the type specimen of this species, 
which is now in the Derby Museum at Liverpool. 


302. Ertocnemis Luctant .. - - Vol. IV. Pl, CCLXXIII. 


Trochilus Luciani, Boure. 
Hylocharis Luciani, Gray & Mitch. 
Eriopus luciani, Bonap. 
T. (Eriopus) Luciani, Jard. 
* Phemonoé Luciani, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 9. 
*Briocnemis Luciani, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 6, pl. 730. 
figs. 4671-72. 
_ Habitat. Ecuador; western side of Pichincha at an elevation of 
10,000 to 12,000 feet (Jameson). 


‘803. Ertocnemis MosquERA . Vol. IV. Pl. CCLXXIV. 


Trochilus Mosquera, Boure. et Delatt. 


Hylocharis mosquera, Gray & Mitch. 


Eriopus mosquera, Bonap. 
* Threptria Mosquera, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 9- 
*Eriocnemis Mosquera, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p- 6, pl. 728. 


figs. 4664-65. 3 
Habitat. The neighbourhood of Pasto in New Granada (De- 
lattre). 


145 


304. ERIOCNEMIS VESTITA + > Vol. IV. Pl. CCLXXV. 


Ornismya vestita, Longuem., Delatt. et Boure. 
Trochilus uropygialis, Fras. 
Ornismya glomata, Less. 
Hylocharis vestita, Gray & Mitch. 
Eriopus vestita, Bonap. 
Eriocnemis vestita, Reichenb. 
_ Eriocnemys vestitus, Bonap. 
* Eriocnemis vestita, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p- 73- 
Habitat. The Andes of New Granada. Commonly sent from 
Bogota. 


305. ERIOCNEMIS NIGRIVESTIS - + + Vol. IV. Pl CCLXXVI. 


Trochilus nigrivestis, Boure. 

Eriocnemys nigrivestis, Bonap. 

Eriocnemis nigrivestis, Reichenb. 

T. vestinigra, Verr. MSS. ? 

Habitat. Ecuador, environs of Tumbaro ( Boircier). 


306. ErtocneMIs GODINI -. + = + Vol. EV. PI. CCLXXVIL. 


Trochilus Godini, Bourc. 
Eriocnemys godini, Bonap. 
Erioenemis Godini, Reichenb. 


Habitat. Ecuador. 


307. ErtocNeMIs D’ORBIGNYI - + Vol. IV. Pl. CCLXXVIIL 


Trochilus D’ Orbignyi, Boure. 
Phemonoé D’ Orbignyi, Reichenb. 
Eriocnemis D’ Orbignyi, Reichenb. 
Eriocnemys orbigny?, Bonap. 
Habitat. Peru or Bolivia. 


308. ERIOCNEMIS DeRBIANA. .- ~- Vol. IV. Pl. CCLXXIX. 


Trochilus Derbyi, Delatt. et Boure. 
Eriopus Derbyi, Gould. , 
derby, Bonap. 
Eriocnemys derbyanus, Bonap. 
Treptria Derbyi, Reichenb. 
*Briocnemis Derbyi, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 6, pl. 728. figs. 
4666-67 and pl. 741. figs. 4698-99. 3 


Habitat. Volcano of Puracé in New Granada (Delattre). 
Vol. IV. Pl. CCLXXX. 


g09. ERIOCNEMIS ALINE . + + + ° 


Ornismyia Aline, Boure. 
Ornismya Aline, Boure. 
Hylocharis Aline, Gray & Mitch. 
Eriopus aline, Bonap. 

Engyete Aline, Reichenb. 
Eriocnemys alina, Bonap. 


146, 


* Trochilus dasypus, Licht. in Mus. of Berlin. 
*Eriocnemis Alinae, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 73. 


Habitat. The hilly parts of New Granada. 


310. ERIocNEMIS SQUAMATA, Gould . Vol. IV. Pl. CCLXXXI. 
Habitat. Ecuador. 


311. ERIocNEMIS LUGENS, Gould . . Vol. 1V. Pl. CCLXXXII. 


Eriopus lugens, Gould. 
Eriocnemys lugens, Bonap. 
* Threptria lugens, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 9. 
*Eriocnemis lugens, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 6, pl. 740. figs. 
4695-96. 


Habitat. Ecuador; western side of Pichincha (Jameson). 


It is just possible that this may prove to be the female of Z. squa- 
mata; for I have received many specimens from Professor Jameson 
with wholly white puffs, which is the characteristic of the E. lugens ; 
while from another locality one has been sent with partly white and 
partly red puffs: independently of the difference in the colouring of 
the puffs, the latter birds are larger than the former. 


19° Tenickunis Ateneo rel WERE Reeth. 


Trochilus Aurelie, Boure. 
Hylocharis Aurelia, Gray & Mitch. 
Eriopus aurelia, Bonap. 
Eriocnemys aurelie, Bonap. 
Eriocnemis Aurelie, Reichenb. 


Habitat. New Granada and Ecuador. 


Specimens from the Napo differ considerably from those received 
from Bogota,—a deep coppery hue pervading both the upper and 
under surface, whereas those parts are green in the Bogotan birds. 
I have seen specimens which I consider may be females or young 
of this species with wholly white puffs. 


Proceeding from Mexico, southwards, through the high lands of 
the temperate regions of Guatemala, Costa Rica, and Veragua, we 
there find several species of the well-defined genus Cyanomyia 
which do not pass the Isthmus of Panama, while others occur in New 
Granada, Ecuador, and Peru. I have not yet seen any species of 
this form from Brazil or from any of the eastern portions of the 
South American continent. They are all very lovely birds, the 
colours with which they are adorned being blue, glittering green, 
and white, to which the red bills of one or two of them offer a 
pleasing contrast. The females, although generally resembling the 
males, are inferior to them in size and colouring. With these birds 
I commence the fifth volume. 


147 
Genus Cyanomyta, Bonap. 


313. CYANOMYIA QUADRICOLOR «- + Vol. VY. PL CCE MASSAY. 


’ Trochilus quadricolor, Vieill. — 
Polytmus quadricolor, Gray & Mitch. 
Cyanomyia quadricolor, Bonap. 
Uranomitra quadricolor, Reichenb. 
- * Ornismya eyanocephala, Less. Supp. des Ois.-mou. p. 132, pl.17. 
* Trochilus verticals, Licht. Preis-Verz. Mexican. Thier. ges. V- 
Deppe & Schiede (Sept. 1830), Nos. 27, 28. 
* Cyanomyia verticalis, Bonap. Rev. et Mag. de Zool. 1854, p. 254. 
* Agyrtria quadricolor, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 7, pl. 761. figs. 
4°758-59. ‘ 
* Uranomitra guadricolor, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 41. 


Habitat. Northern Mexico. 


814. CyaNoMyIA vioLicers, Gould . Vol. V. Pl. CCLXXXV. 


* Uranomitra violiceps, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 41, 
note. 


Habitat. Western Mexico. 


315. CYANOMYIA CYANOCEPHALA. . Vol. V. Pl. CCLXXXVI. 
* Ornismya cyanocephala, Less. Supp. des Ois.-mou. p. 134, pl. 18. 
* Polytmus verticalis, Gray & Mitch. Gen. of Birds, vol. i. p. 109. 

Polytmus, sp. 86. 

*? Uranomitra cyanocephala, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 10. 

* Cyanomyia cyanocephala, Bonap. Rev. et Mag. de Zool. 1854, 
p. 254; Montes de Oca, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philad. 1860, 
p- 80. 

* Agyrtria Faustine, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 7, pl. 760. figs. 
4756-57. 

* Agyrtria cyanocephala, Reichenb. ib. p. 7, pl. 760s figs. 4754-55. 

* Uranomitra Lessoni, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iit. p. 41. 


Habitat. Southern Mexico. 


“ This Humming-Bird,” says M. Montes de Oca, “is generaily 
known by the name of Chupa-mirto comun de peche blanco, or Com- 


mon White-breasted Myrtle-sucker. It is found very abundantly — 


and at all seasons of the year in the vicinity of Jalapa, Coatepec, 
Orizaba, and many other places in Mexico, where it remains all 
the year round, and I have often found its nest in the months of 
April and May. 

« This pretty little bird is very familiar and unsuspicious, will allow 
of a near approach in the woods, and is a constant visitor of the 
gardens of the towns and cities. Like the fine Campylopterus 
Delattrei, it frequents the magapan flowers, around which it may 
be seen at all hours of the day. 

“The nest of this species, like those of nearly all the Humming- 
Birds of this part of Mexico (Jalapa), is lined with the tull silky 
floss; and is most ingeniously covered on the outside with moss 


148 


from the rocks. The eggs are generally two in number, but upon 
one occasion I found three in a nest.” 

In my account of this species, I have stated that it was found in 
Guatemala as well as Mexico; and although this may be the case, I 
believe the latter country to be its true habitat. Guatemalan differ 
from Mexican specimens in the colouring of the tail-feathers ; in the 
latter they are olive-green, in the former rich bronzy-green. Under 
these circumstances I cannot regard them as identical, I must there- 
fore give the Guatemalan bird a distinctive appellation :— 


316. CyaNnomy1A GUATEMALENSIS, Gould. 
Cyanomyia cyanocephala, Salvin in Ibis, vol. ii. p. 39. 
Habitat. Guatemala. 


“ About Duefas,” says Mr. Salvin, ‘‘ this is an abundant species. 
It frequents the shrubby forest, feeding principally among the 
flowers of a tree which abounds there. This tree, which grows to 
a height of about 20 or 30 feet, bears clusters of white flowers, and 
has its branches and stem covered with spines, which sting when 
touched. Its bark also, wher bruised, emits a milky fluid, which 
blisters the skin if any be allowed to remain upon it. The bird, 
when taking its food from this tree, places itself ia front of a bunch 
of the flowers, and hovers opposite, at a distance of about two or 
three inches. On perceiving the object of its search, it darts in, 
and seizing whatever that may be, insect or honey, returns to its 
position in front of the cluster. So it passes on from blossom to 
blossom, and in like manner from cluster to cluster, until the whole 
tree is thoroughly ransacked. Humming-Birds do not remain long 
on the wing at once, but rest, frequently choosing for that purpose 
a small dead or leafless twig at the top or just within the branches 
of the tree. While in this position they take the opportunity of 
trimming their feathers and cleaning their bill, all the time keeping 
up an incessant jerking of their wings and tail. When this opera- 
tion has been performed, they peer about for fresh flowers at which 
to dart. The cry of the present species is somewhat represented by 
the word ‘chirik’ uttered frequently and with great rapidity. 
This cry seems common to all the family; and it is only from an 
intimate acquaintance that one can trace a difference between the 
species. When they are flying from one place to another, or pur- 
suing each other, this cry is especially used, and in the latter case 
it is uttered with great vehemence. The humming sound from 
which these birds take their trivial name is something like that 
produced by a large beetle; but very little practice will soon so 
accustom the ear that it seldom mistakes the unseen presence of a 
Humming-Bird for anything else.”—J0zs, vol. i. p. 127. 

‘< Last year, in a cypress tree near the house at Duejias, a pair of 
these birds built their nest. This year I found a branch of the 
same tree similarly tenanted, the new nest being only a few yards 
from the site of the old one. To obtain it, I was obliged to cut 
away the branch; and though, in falling, the nest was quite thrown 
on its side, the eggs, much to my surprise, did not fall out; this I 


149 


afterwards found was owing to the lip of the nest turning inwards. 
Another pair commenced building near the house ; and the male 
bird frequently came while 1 was preparing skins in the corridor, | 
and took pieces of cotton almost from my hand. In the afternoon 
of August 14 my friend Mr. Wyld observing it making a descent 
upon some small object in his room, shut the window and called me.. 
The intruder, who was wearied from fluttering against the window, 
suffered itself to be caught. In a very few moments its agitation 
ceased, and it seemed to be taking advantage of its comfortable 
place in my hand to rest from its fatigues, making no attempt to 
escape. Before letting it go I procured a piece of sugar, and, after 
dipping it in water, put it to the tip of its bill. Almost immediately 
its long tongue was employed in sucking up the liquid. On libe- 
rating it, it lew to a tree close at hand, and seemed to take no 
further notice of its late captivity.” Salvin in Ibis, vol. ii. p. 39. 


317. CyANoMYIA FRANCIZ£ . 


Trochilus Francie, Boure. 
Uranomitra Francie, Reichenb. 
Cyanomyia francia, Bonap., Sclat. 
Polytmus Francie, Gray & Mitch. 

*Agyrtria Francie, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 7, pl. 761. figs. 

4760-61. 
* Trochilus hypoleucus, Licht. in Mus. of Berlin. 
* Uranomitra Francie, Cab. et Hein, Mus. Hein. Theil iii, p. 41. 


Habitat. New Granada. 


Vol. V. Pl. CCLXXXVIU. 


318. CYANOMYIA GYANICOLLIS, Gould Vol. V. Pl. CCLXXXVII. 
Trochilus (———?) eyanocollis, Gould. 
Uranomitra cyanicollis, Reichenb. 
Cyanomyia cyanicollis, Bonap. 
* Agyrtria cyanicollis, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 7. 
* Uranomitra cyanicollis, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 41, 
note. 


Habitat. Peru. 


Nearly allied to Cyanomyta is the 


Genus Hemisti1LBon, Gould. 
(‘Hpt-, semi, et oriAPwr, micans. ) 


Generic characters. 

Male.—Biil longer than the head and straight ; wings moderately 
long and considerably curved ; taal rather short and truncate; tarsi 
clothed ; feet rather small; find toe shorter than the middle toe; 
nails short and curved. 

Although I have placed this genus next to Cyanomyia, I consider 
that it has some relationship to the Amazilia. 


150 


319. HemistTitpon Ocat, Gould. 
Amazilia Ocai, Gould . . . . . Vol. V. Pl. CCLXXXIX. 


*Pyrrhophaena Ocai, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil. iii. p- 36, 
note. 


Habitat. Mexico. 


This beautiful species was discovered by M. Rafael Montes de 
Oca at Xalapa. 


In this genus I provisionally place the Trochilus Norrisi, of 
which a single specimen exists in the Loddigesian collection, but 
unfortunately is so situated that I could not subject it to so careful 
an examination as I could have desired. 


-320. HemistTitpon Norrist. 


* Trochilus Norrisii, Boure. Proc. of Zool. Soe. part xv. p. 47. 

*Polytmus Norrisi, Gray and Mitch. Gen. of Birds, vol. i. p. 108 ; 
Polyimus, sp. 71. 

*Amazilia Norrisii, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p- 10; Id. Troch. 
Enum. p. 8. 

*Amazilius Norrisi, Bonap. Rev. et Mag. de Zool. 1854, p. 254. 

*Pyrrhophaena Norrisi, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p: 36, 
note. 


Habitat. Bolanos in Central Mexico. 


At present only one species is known of the 


Genus Leucirrus, Bonap. ; 
but I am inclined to believe that other birds of this form exist; in- 
deed I have all but positive evidence that such is the case, in a 
specimen killed by M. Warszewicz in Peru, which for the present I 
decline describing, as it may possibly be only a female of some un- 
known species, the male of which will be differently coloured. 


321. Leuciprtus CHiONOGASTER. . . . . Vol. V. Pl. CCXC, 


Trochilus leucogaster, Tschudi. 
Lampornis chionogaster, Tschudi. 
Polyimus chionogaster, Gray & Mitch. 
Leucippus turneri, Bonap. 
Lhaumatias leucogaster, Bonap. 
Lrochilus Turneri, Boure. 
ae ( ?) hypoleucus, Gould. 
Polytmus hypoleucus, Gray & Mitch. 
Thaumantias chionogaster, Bonap. 
Leucippus Turneri, Reichenb. 
*Leucippus chionogaster, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. ie Sh. 
Habitat. Peru and Bolivia. 


Genus Levéocutoris, Reichend. 


This is another form of which a singlé species only has yet been 
discovered. 


151 


329. LEUCOCHLORIS ALBICOLLIS + + + ° Vol. V. Pl. CCXCI. 


Trochilus albicollis, Vieill., Temm., Less., Jard. 
Ornismya albicollis, Less. 
Lampornis albicollis, Less. 
Basilinna albicollis, Less. 
Colibri albigularis, Spix. 
Polytmus albicollis, Gray & Mitch. 
~ Thaumatias albicolls, Bonap. 
Thaumantias albicollis, Bonap. 
Leucochloris albicollis, Reichenb. 
* Trochilus vulgaris, Wied, Beit. iv. p- 72. 
*Leucippus albicollis, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 8, pl. 782- 
figs. 4818-19. 
* Agyrtria albicollis, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 32. 
*Thaumatias albicollis, Burm. Th. Bras. tom. ii. p. 342. 


Habitat. Brazil; and Tucuman, according to Dr. Burmeister. 
This isa very pretty species, distinguished by its green and white 
plumage. The sexes are alike in external appearance. 


The genus Thawmatias, as proposed by Bonaparte and adopted 
by me, comprises many species respecting which much confusion 
exists, especially with regard to the names applied to them by the 
older authors; some confusion, also, occurs with respect to the species 


I have called Thaumatias Linnei, which I fear cannot be satisfac- © 


torily unravelled. If it should be decided that it is not the bird 
Bonaparte intended, I trust it will be allowed to stand as the 
“ Thaumatias Linnei, Gould, nec Bonap.” The other synonyms 
may or may not be applicable to it, but they are given on the au- 

_ thority of M. Bourcier of Paris. ‘This is another of those instances 
which unfortunately occur too frequently for the advantage of 
science ; I mean the impossibility of determining the species in- 
tended in the curt descriptions left us by Gmelin and others of Tobact 
or Tobagensis, Ourissia, cum multis aliis. 


Genus THaumatias, Bonap. 


The species of this form are natives of Brazil, the banks of the 
Rivers Amazon and Napo, the Guianas, the Island of Trinidad, 


Venezuela, New Granada, and Central America. The sexes Ot: 


each species are alike in colour. If any difference be observable, it 
is in the outer tail-feathers of the female being faintly tipped with 
olive-grey. 
693. THAUMATIAS CANDIDUS + + © + + Vol. V. Pl. CCXCII. 
Trochilus candidus, Boure. et Muls. 
Polytmus candidus, Gray & Mitch. 
Thaumatias candidus, Bonap. : 
* Agyrtria candida, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 33, note. 
Habitat. Guatemala and Southern Mexico. 


Mr. Salvin states that this species is “common on the Atlantic 
coast-region, about Yzabal, and thence one day’s ride into the 


152 


interior. Very abundant about Coban. Many species of Humming- 
Birds in Guatemala extend through a great range of temperature, 
the same species being frequently found both in the coast regions 
and also in the more elevated districts.” Mr. Taylor saw very few 
examples of this bird in Honduras. 


324, THAUMATIAS CHIONOPECTUS, Gould Vol. V. Pl. CCXCIII. 
* Agyrtria niveipectus, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p.33, note. 
Habitat. Trinidad, Cayenne, and Guiana. 


325. THAUMATIAS LEUCOGASTER . . . Vol. V. Pl. CCXCIV. 
Trochilus leucogaster, Gmel., Lath., Vieill. 
Mellisuga cayanensis, ventre albo, Briss. 
_ Agyrtria leucogastra, Reichenb. 
Thaumantias leucogaster, Bonap. 
Ornismya albirostris, Less. 
*Cynanthus leucogaster, Jard. Nat. Lib. Humming Birds, vol. ii. 
p- 149. , 
* Trochilus mellisugus, Burm. Th. Bras. tom. ii.. p. 343. 
* Agyrtria leucogastra, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii, p- 34. 
* Trochilus Cleopatra, Gould, MS. 
Habitat. North-eastern Brazil, Cayenne, and the Guianas. 


326. THAUMATIAS VIRIDICEPS, Gould . . Vol. V. Pl. CCXCV. 
Habitat. Ecuador. 


327. THaumatias Mitter1. . . . . Vol. V. Pl. CCXCVI. 
Trochilus Milleri, Lodd., Boure. 
Polytmus Milleri, Gray & Mitch. 
Thaumatias Milleri, Bonap. 
Agyrtria Milleri, Reichenb. 
Thaumantias Milleri, Bonap. 

*Agyrtria Miller, Cab. et Hein. in Mus. Hein. Theil iii, p. 33, note. 
Habitat. New Granada. Common in the neighbourhood of 
Bogota. 

328. THAUMATIAS NITIDIFRONS, Gould Vol. V. Pl. CCXCVII. 

Habitat. Unknown: supposed to be Venezuela, 


329. ‘THAUMATIAS CHRULEICEPS, Gould. 


Thaumatias ceruleiceps, Gould in Proc. Zool. Soc. part xxviii. 
ps. 207% 


Habitat. New Granada. Received from Bogota. 


330. THAUMATIAS BREVIROSTRIS . . Vol. V. Pl. CCXCVIII. 


Ornismya brevirostris, Less. 
Basilinna brevirostris, Less. 
Polytmus brevirostris, Gray & Mitch. 
Thaumatias brevirostris, Bonap. 
Lhaumantias brevirostris, Bonap. 


BES 


Agyrtria brevirostris, Reichenb. 
* Trochilus versicolor, “ Licht,” Nord. Erm. Reis. Atl. pp. 3, 27, 


ae On ee oe 
*Hylocharis versicolor, Gray &. Mitch. Gen. of Birds, vol. i. 
p. 115; Hylocharis, sp. 45, Bonap. Consp. Gen. Av. tom. i. 


p. 74; Hylocharis, sp. 9. 


+ Agyrtria versicolor, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 10; Id. Troch. 


Enum. p. 7, pl. 759. figs. 475 


0-51. 


-* Thaumantias versicolor, Bovap- 


Rev. et Mag. de Zool. 1854, 


p. 250. 
* Agyrtria brevirostris, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 34. 
Habitat. South-eastern Brazil. 


331. THAUMATIAS AFFINIS, Gould Vol. V. Pl. CCXCIX. 

* Agyrtria affinis, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 33, note. 

Habitat. Southern Brazil; the districts of Novo Friburgo and 
Minas Geraes. 


332, THAUMATIAS CHIONURUS, Gould Vol. V. Pl. CCC 


Trochilus ( Thaumatias 2) chionura, Gould. 
*Leucippus chionurus, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col, p. 11; Id. 
Troch. Enum. p. 8, pl. 780. figs. 4813-15. 
*Thaumantias chionurus, Bonap. Rev. et Mag. de Zool. 1854, 


p- 255. 
* Agyrtria chionura, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil ili. p. 32, note. 


Habitat. Costa Rica. 


333. THAUMATIAS ALBIVENTRIS ellide 


Trochilus tephrocephalus, Vieill. 
Ornismya tephrocephalus, Less. 
— albiventris, Less: 

Polytmus thaumatias, Gray & Mitch. 

Coeligena tephrocephala, Reich. 

Agyritria albwentris, Reich. 

Thaumatias albiventris, Bonap. 

Thaumantias albiventris, Bonap. 
* Trochilus albiventris, Jard. Nat. Lib. Humm. Birds, vol. ii. p. 141. 
* Agyrtria albiventris, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 32. 


Vol, V. Pl. CCCI. 


Habitat. Brazil, the neighbourhood of Sta. Catharina (Boureier). 


This, the largest species of the genus, has the centre of the ab- 
domen and the under tail-coverts white. 


334. THAUMATIAS Linnai, Bonap. og, ig Vor V. Pl CCCIE 


Thaumantias linnei, Bonap. 
Trochilus Tobaci, Gwel. 

___——_ Tobagensis, Lath. 
maculatus, Aud. et Vieill. ? 
__— Tobago, Shaw rt 

Ornismy4 viridissima, Less. 


154 


*Trochilus viridissimus, Jard. Nat. Lib. Humming Birds, vol ii. 
p- 149. 
* Trochilus viridipectus, Sauc. in Mus. Berol. et Heinean. 
* Saucerottia viridipectus, Reichenb. Autz. der Col. p. 7. 
*Agyrtria Thaumantias, Reichenb. Troch. Enum, p. 7, pl. 756. 
tigs. 4738-39. 
* Chlorestes viridipectus, Reich. Troch. Enum, p, 4, pl. 702. fiys. 
4573-75. 
*Hylocharis lactea, fem., Reich. Troch. Enum. p. 8, pl. 772. fig. 
4792. 
* Coeligena Maugei, fem. (1!!), Reichenb. in Mus. of Berlin (Cabanis). 
* Agyriria maculata, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 33. 
Habitat. Northern Brazil, Cayenne, Dutch and British Guiana, 
Trinidad, and Venezuela. 
This bird is much smaller than the last, has less white on the ab- 
domen, and the under tail-coverts tinged with grey. 
I think it likely that pl. 62 of Lesson’s ‘ Histoire Naturelle des 
Oiseaux-monches’ has reference to this species, and the text to the 
T. albiventris. 


335. THAUMATIAS FLUVIATILIS, Gould. 


Habitat. Banks of the River Napo. 


In size this bird rather exceeds the last, and has a more than pro- 
portionately longer bill; the breast is glittering deep or grass green 


instead of golden green, and there is a narrow irregular streak of 
greyish white on the abdomen; but the great difference which di- 
stinguishes it from the 7’. Linnai and the rest is the colouring of the 
under tail-coverts, the centres of which are dark brown margined 
with greyish white; the tail-feathers are short and of a nearly uni- 
form dull black. 

Total length 4 inches, bill 25%, wing 1, tail 14. 


336. THAUMATIAS APICALIS, Gould. 
Habitat. New Granada. 


About the same size as the last, with an equally lengthened bill ; 
the. upper surface golden green; the centre of the abdomen and 
under tail-coverts pure white; the four outer tail-feathers steel- 
black margined with pure white at the tip. 

Total length 33 inches, bill I, wing 24, tail 12. 


337. THAUMATIAS MACULICAUDUS, Gould. 
Ffabitat. British Guiana. 


This is a very little species with a long thin bill; its breast is 
green as in the others ; the centre of its abdomen white ; the under 
tail-coverts white, except in the centre, where they are dark brown ; 
but the great difference is in the tail, which is exceedingly pretty, 
the two centre feathers being bronzy green, except at the extreme 
tip, which is greenish black, the next on each side bronze for haif 
their length, then black ; the three outer ones on each side bronzy 


155 


green at their base, then broadly zoned with black, next to which 
they are green, and lastly white. 

Total length 32 inches, bill 4, wing 2, tail 14. 

A specimen of this bird was brought from Guiana by Sir Robert 
Schomburgk; and in all probability the species is an inhabitant of 
the interior. 

The five preceding species are all very nearly alike, and form a 
minor section; they are confined to a comparatively limited area. 
The remaining members of the genus are more widely distributed, 
one of them inhabiting Guatemala and Costa Rica, and two or three 
Veragua, while the others frequent Venezuela, Trinidad, the Guianas, 
and Brazil; but as each of the species has its proper habitat indi- 
cated, it will be unnecessary to say more on the subject here. The 
females are very similar to the males in colour, except in the case of 
the rare species I have called 7. chionurus, where the two sexes 
differ considerably, as may be seen on reference to the plate in which 
they are represented. 5 


The group of Humming-Birds to which I next direct attention 
comprise the genera Amazilia, Pyrrhophena, Erythronota, Euphe- 
rusa, Saucerottia, Sapphironia, Hylocharis, and others, ranging be- 
tween the Amazilie and the little green species forming the genus 
Chlorostilbon. These birds are the least understood of the Trochi- 
lide, and are certainly the most difficult and perplexing to discrimi- 
nate of the entire family. I will, however, do my best to unravel 
the confusion with which they are surrounded, and to place both the 
genera and species in as clear a light as my experience enables me. 
‘To do this effectively it will be necessary to replace some of the 
species in the genera from which they have been separated, and to 
propose a further subdivision of the remainder. In so doing it must 
not be understood that I am desirous of increasing the number of 
genera ; I merely wish to indicate by a distinctive appellation the 
sections into which the birds appear to be naturally divided. To 
particularize the provinces of South America over which the mem- 
bers of the various genera are distributed would be useless ; for their 
dispersion may be said to be general, as they are found from Mexico 
to Bolivia on the western coast, and from Brazil to Venezuela on the 
eastern; few of the species, however, go very far either north or south, 
and still fewer are found in the West India Islands. The members 
of the genus Amaczilia, as restricted, are all of somewhat large size, 
and are easily recognized, each of them having well-marked charac- 
ters. There is but little difference in the outward appearance of the 
sexes. The equatorial regions of the Andes are their head-quarters ; 
and it is there that we find the A. pristena, the A. alticola, the A. 
Dumerili, and the A. leucophea. ‘These four species, I consider, 
form a very natural section. 


Genus AmMazitia, Reichenb. 


998. AMAZILIA PRISTINA + + + s+ ¢ 5 Vol. V. Pl. CCCIIL. 
Orthorhynchus Amazili, Less. 


156 


Ornismya Amazili, Less. 
Polytmus Amazili, Gray & Mitch. 
Trochilus (Lampornis) Amazilia, Tschudi. 
Amazilius latirostris, Bonap. 
Amazilia latirostris, Reich. 
*Phaéthornis Amazilt, Jard. Nat. Lib. Humming Birds, vol. ii. 
Me ae 
eB aon Amazilia, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p- 35. 


Habitat. The neighbourhood of Lima in Peru. 


339. AMAZILIA ALTICOLA, Gould. . . . Vol. V. Pl. CCCIV. 


Habitat. The high lands of Central Peru; the precise locality 
uncertain. 


340. Amazitia Dumenita . . « , + « Volk V. Pl. CCCV: 


Ornismya Dumerilii, Less. 

Trochilus amazicula, Saue. 

Amazilia Amazilicula, Reich. 

Polytmus Dumerilii, Gray & Mitch. 

Amazilia Dumerilii, Reich. 

Amazilius dumerili, Bonap. 

*Pyrrhophaena Dumerili, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. 
p. 36, note. 


Habitat. Ecuador, on the coast in the neighbourhood of Guaya- 
quil, and on the Isle of Puna. Found also at Babahoyo by 
Mr. Fraser, who states that the bill is red with a black tip. 


341. AMAZILIA LEUCOPHEA, Reichenb. . . Vol. V. Pl. CCCVI. 


Amazilia leucophoea, Reichenb. 
* Pyrrhophaena leucophaea, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p- 35. 


Habitat. Southern Peru. Collected in the vicinity of the Volcano 
of Arequipa by M. Warszewicz. 


I retain Dr. Cabanis’s generic term Pyrrhophena for the ten 
succeeding species :— 


342. PyRRHOPHENA CINNAMOMEA. 
aeszi lia dorallirostiis se 45 ee el PO we 


Trochilus corallirostris, Boure. et Muls. 
Polytmus corallirostris, Gray & Miteh. 
Amazilius corallirostris, Bonap. 
Amazilia corallirostris, Reich. 
—*Ornismya cinnamomea, Less. Rev. Zool. 1842, p. 175. 
*Ornismya rutila, Delatt. L’Echo du Monde Savant, No.45 Juin 
15, 1843, col. 1069. 
* Pyrrhophaena corallirostris, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. p. 35, note. 


Habitat. Central America. 
“This species,” says Mr. Salvin, “seems to be an inhabitant of 


157 


the hot sea-bord only, and does not extend its vertical range to a 
greater elevation than 2000 feet. In such regions on the Pacific 
coast it is very abundant, and is, in fact, the commonest of the 
family—in some parts almost swarming. In every village numbers 
may be seen flitting about the blossoms of the orange and lime trees. 
Its horizontal range appears to be extensive, and may be said to 
include the whole of the southern portion of Guatemala, from the 
confines of Chiapas to the State of San Salvador, and probably also 
embraces the Balsam Coast of that republic, as Captain Taylor 
obtained examples on Tigré Island in the Bay of Fonseca. ’—Jbis, 
vol. i. p. 130. 

“It is common about San Gerénimo; but seems not to be found 
in the colder and more elevated portions of the republic, neither 
oceurring at Duefias nor Coban. A nest with two young and the 
hen bird was brought to me Dec. 6th; the young were half-grown, 
and would have flown in about ten days. My specimens show that, 
as far as the feathers are concerned, the sexes are alike. A difference, 
however, exists in the bill,—that of the male having much more of 
the brilliant colour from which the species takes its name, in the 
upper mandible. In the young bird the upper mandible is black.” — 
Ibis, vol. ii. pp. 268, 269. 

Mr. Taylor, speaking of the birds observed by him in the Republic 
of Honduras, &e., says, “ This Humming-Bird is the only one I ob- 
served in any numbers, and that only in certain localities. There 
were some in Tigré Island, and I saw them here and there on our 
march across the country. I found them most abundant near 
Comayagua, 1900 feet above the sea. They were very plentiful on 
the plain near the town, and not far from the Campo Santo, where 
the ground was tolerably open and the cactus grew abundantly. 
There I observed hundreds hovering about the flowers of the 
cactus.”—JIbis, vol. ii. p. 115. 


343. PyRRHOPHEZNA YUCATANENSIS. 
Amacilix Vucammenew 40 235. + 6 Vol. V~- Pl. CCCVIII. 
Trochilus Yucatanensis, Cabot. 

_ Habitat. Yucatan. 


344. PyRRHOPHENA CERVINIVENTRIS, Gould. 
Amazilia cerviniventris, Gould . . . . Vol. V. Pl. CCCIX. 


* Pyrrhophaena cerviniventris, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. 
p- 36, note. 


Habitat. Mexico. In the neighbourhood of Cordova, according 
to M. Sallé. 


345. PyRRHOPHENA CASTANEIVENTRIS. 


Amazilia castaneiventris, Gould . . + - Vol. V. Pl. CCCX.. 


Amazilius castaneiventris, Gould. 
Habitat. New Granada. 


158 


346. PyRRHOPHHNA RIEFFERI. 
Ajmazilia Rieflert: <>. wlan ee ee VO Ve Pe Coe AR 


Trochilus Riefferi, Bourc. 
Amazilius riefferi, Bonap., Sclat. 
Amazilia Riefferi, Reich., Sclat., Salv. 
Polytmus Riefferi, Gray & Mitch. 
Trochilus Dubusii, Boure. 
Amazilia Pata Reich. 
Amazilius dubusi, Bonap., Sclat. 
Trochilus fuscicaudatus, Fras. 
Hylocharis fuscicaudatus, Gray & Mitch. 
*Ornismya amazili, Delatt. Echo. du Monde Savant, No. 45, 
Juin 15, 1843, col. 1069. 
* Trochilus arsinoides, Sauc. in Mus. of Berlin. 
eh iipheaia Riefferi, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 36. 
Dubusi, Cab. et Hein. Ib. p. 36. 
z suavis, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 36, 
note. 


ffabitat. Southern Mexico, Guatemala, and along the Andes to 
Ecuador. 


Nearly thirty specimens are now before me from these various 
countries, among them M. Bourcier’s type specimen of Dubusi, 
also specimens collected by Warszewicz in Costa Rica; and I see 


nothing to induce a belief that there is any specific difference 
between those found in Mexico, Guayaquil in Eeuador, or in any 
of the intermediate countries. I admit that differences occur both 
in size and in the fringing of the outer tail-feathers: generally 
speaking, they are darker in the Costa Rican and New Granadian 
specimens; but I have some quite as bronzy from those countries as 
the generality of specimens found in Honduras and Guatemala. 
These latter are the birds to which the term Dubusi has been ap- 
plied. 


347. PyRRHOPHA/NA BERYLLINA. 
Amazilia beryllina . . . . . » - Vol. V. Pl. CCCXII. 


Trochilus beryllinus, Licht. 

Ornismya Arsinoé, Less. 

Cynanthus Arsinoé, Jard. 

Polytinus Arsinoé, Gray & Mitch. 
Amazilius arsinoé, Bonap. 

Amazilia Arsinoé, Reich. 
Pyrrhophaena beryllina, Cab. et Hein. 


Habitat. Southern Mexico. M. Botta found it at Orizaba, and 
M. Sallé at Cordova. 
348. PyrruopHm@na DevILLet. 
Amazilia Devillei . . . ya ev VOW Ph COGKHI. 
Trochilus Devillei, Bourc., Gas & Mitch. 


Amazilia Devillei, Reich. 
Amazilius devillei, Bonap. 
Trochilus Marie, Boure.? 
Hylocharis marie, Gray & Mitch., Bonap. 
Smaragdites Mariae, Reich. 
* Saucerottia maria, Bonap. Rev. et Mag. de Zool. 1854, p- 255 ? 
Chlorestes Mariae, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 4, pl. 695. fig. 
; 4549. 
* Panychlora Mariae, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 49, note. 
Amazilia Dumerili, Salv. Ibis, vol. ii. p. 270. 


Habitat. Guatemala. 


Speaking of this species, which by some inadvertence he has 
called Dumerili instead of Devillei, Mr. Salvin says, “ During the 
months of July, August, and September, one of its most favourite 
resorts was the western boundary of the Llafio of Duefas, which, 
starting from the village and bounded to the eastward by the river 
Guacalate, extends, sweeping by the Volcan de Fuego, almost to the 
Hacienda of Capertillo, its southern extremity. Dispersed all over 
this plain is found, in groves, patches, and isolated trees, a ite 
Convolvulus, bearing a white flower, and attaining an average 
height of about 25 or 30 feet. During the above months this 
elegant species might be seen in almost every tree, some feeding 
among the flowers, some settled quietly on a dead branch, uttering 
their low, plaintive, hardly to be called musical, yet certainly 
cheering song, others less peacefully occupied in a war of expulsion, 
driving out by vehement cries and more effectual blows the tenant 
of a tree, which in its turn wreaks vengeance on some weaker or 
unexpectant antagonist.” —Ibis, vol. ii. p. 270. 


349, PyRRHOPHENA VIRIDIGASTER. 
Amazilia viridigaster . 29... « «Vol. V. Pl. CCCXIV. 


Trochilus viridigaster, Boure. 

Hylocharis viridigaster, Bonap., Gray & Mitch. 

Saucerottia viridiventris, Reichenb. 

_—. viridigastra, Bonap., Sclat. 

* Chlorestes viridiventris, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 4, pl. 699. 
figs. 4564-65. 

* Hemithylaca viridiventris, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 38. 


Habitat. New Granada. Common in the neighbourhood of 
Bogota. 


350. PyRRHOPHENA IODURA. 


Trochilus iodurus, Sauc. in Mus. Hein. 
* Saucerottia iodura, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 8. 
* Chlorestes todurus, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 4, pl. 698. figs. ae 
4560-61. 
* Hemithylaca iodura, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 39. 
* [rochilus Aglaie, Boure. Ann. Soe. Sci. Phys. et Nat. Lyon, fl - 
1846, p- 399? Id. Rev. Zool. 1846, p. 318? ih 


mM 2 Ny 


160 


Polytmus, sp.73 ? 

*Amazilius aglaie, Bonap. Consp. Gen. Av. tom. i. p- 71, Ama- 
2ztlius, sp. 11? 

* Saucerottia Aglaiae, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p- 8? 

* Chlorestes Aglaiae, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p- 4? 

*Hemithylaca Aglaiae, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 38, 
note? 


Habitat. New Granada? 


The specimen named iodura in the Museum of M. Heine at 
Halberstadt is different from the bird so called in the Museum at 
Berlin. The former has a glittering crown and light-lilac shining 
tail-feathers; while the latter has a dull-coloured crown, and the tail 
so nearly resembling that of P. viridigaster, that I have no doubt of 
its being a young bird, or a female of that species. On the other 
hand, I think M. Heine’s bird is a distinct species, and I have there- 
fore retained it under the term iodura. 


*Polytmus Aglaie, Gray & Mitch. Gen. of Birds, vol. i. p. 109, 


351. PYRRHOPH#NA CYANURA. 
Amazilia cyanura, Gould. . . . . . Vol. V. Pl. CCCXV. 
* Hemithylaca cyanura, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. p- 38, note. 
Habitat. Pacific side of Nicaragua ; Realjo ? 


The E£rythronote are nearly allied to the Pyrrhopheng. As in 


that genus, the sexes are alike in their colouring. The species are 
much more circumscribed in their habitat, being almost confined to 
Venezuela and the countries immediately adjoining. 

The oldest-known species, which I have called antiqua, appears 
to be subject to much variation in its colour and markings ; but, as 
I stated in my account of that species, I have questioned the pro- 
priety of their separation until we are better acquainted with them. 


Genus ERYTHRONOTA, Gould. 
(’EpvOpes, ruber, et ywros, dorsum.) 


Generic characters. 

Male.—Bill tonger than the head, nearly straight or very slightly 
curved; wings moderately long; dail rather short and slightly 
forked ; tarsi clothed ; hind-toe rather shorter than the middle one ; 
claws short; throat and chest lively green. 

Female. Similar in colour. 


352. ERYTHRONOTA ANTIQUA . . . .. Vol. V. Pl. CCCXVI. 


Ornismya erythronotos, Less. 
erythronotus, Less. 
Polytmus erythronotus, Gray & Mitch. 
Saucerottia erythronota, Bonap., Reich. 

Trochilus erythronotus, Jard. 


161 


* Cynanthus erythronotus, Jard. Nat. Lib. Humming Birds, vol. ii. 
p- 148. 

*Chlorestes erythronotus, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 4, pl. 799. 
figs. 4562-63. ae 

* Hemithylaca erythronota, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 37. 


Habitat. Trinidad, Tobago, and Venezuela. 


The birds from Tobago are very much larger than those from ; 


‘Trinidad ; and some of the specimens from Venezuela have the under 
tail-coverts wholly chestnut; I should have considered this indica- 
tive of another species, had I not found a similar variation in speci- 
mens from Trinidad. 


353. Eryruronota Fericim . . « » Vol. V. Pl. CCCXVIL. 


Ornismya Felicia, Less. 
Saucerottia Feliciae, Reichenb. 
felicia, Bonap. 
Chlorestes Feliciae, Reichenb. 
Hemithylaca Feliciae, Cab. et Hein: 
Trochilus Emile. 


Habitat. Venezuela. 


Piru rtereae ene 


The O. Felicie is admitted by the Frericli Trochilidists to be di- ‘ 
stinect from O. antiqua, and as such [ have kept it; at the same i 
time it is extremely difficult to distinguish one from the other. In ° 


size they are as near alike as possible; but the former has a bluer tail, 
and the back and upper surface destitute of the fiery red colouring 
observable in many specimens, but not in all, of the O. antiqua; the 
under tail-coverts, too, are frequently stained with violet. 


I have a specimen of this bird, presented to me by M. Emile 


Parzudaki, of Paris, with the ndme of Emile attached. The bird 
was killed by him during his visit to South America. 


354. ERyTHRONOTA Epwarpr . . . Vol. V. Pl. GCCGKV Ti. 
Trochilus Edward, Delatt. et Boure. 
Polytmus Edwardsii, Gray & Mitch. 
Amazilius edward, Bonap. 
Thaumantias edward, Bonap. 
Saucerottia Edwardsii, Reich. ; 
*Chlorestes Edwardsii, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 4, pl. 698. 
figs. 4558-60. 
* Hemithylaca Edwardi, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 37, 
note. 


Habitat. Panama, Costa Rica, and Veragua. 


I have specimens of this bird killed by Mr. Bridges near David, at 
an elevation of from 8000 to 10,000 feet, according to the label 
attached. 


355. ERYTHRONOTA NIVEIVENTRIS, Gould Vol. V. Pl. CCCXIX, 
Trochilus (—— i) niveoventer, Gould. 


162 


Thaumantias niveiventer, Bonap. 
Saucerottia niveiventer, Reich. 
*Chlorestes niveiventris, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 4, pl. 700. 
figs. 4566-67. 
*Hemithylaca niveiventris, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. 
ore te 


Habitat. Panama and Veragua. 


856. ERYTHRONOTA ELEGANS, Gould . . Vol. V. Pl. CCCXX. 
Erythronota elegans, Gould, Proc. of Zool. Soc. pt. xxviii. p. 307. 
Habitat. Unknown. 


This is a very elegant species, and quite distinct from every other 
known Humming-Bird. In its glittering light-green crown, throat, 
and chest it looks like a Chlorostilbon; but the form of its tail and 
some other characters ally it to the Hrythronote, with which I have 
provisionally placed it. 


The next natural section is that of Saucerottia, of which I am 
acquainted with three species distinguished from the Hrythronote 
by their larger size, stouter bills, and by their more uniform dark- 
green colouring. All are confined to a comparatively limited area— 
namely, Costa Rica, Veragua, Panama, and the northern parts of 
New Granada. 


Genus SaucerottTiA, Gonap. 


357. SAUCEROTTIA TyPicA, Bonap. 
Erythronota Saucerottei. . . . . . Vol. V. Pl. CCCXXI. 


Trochilus Saucerottii, Boure. et Delatt. 
Polyimus Saucerottii, Gray & Mitch. 
Saucerottia typica, Bonap. 

Chlorestes typicus, Reichenb. 
Hemithylaca Saucerottet, Cab. et Hein. 


Habitat. New Granada. 


358. SAuCEROTTIA SoPHIA. 
Erythronota Sophie. . . . . . ~- Vol. V. Pl. CCCXXII. 
’ Trochilus Sophie, Boure.. °\- 
Polytmus Sophia, Gray & Mitch. 
| Amazilius sophie, Bonap. ae 
Saucerottia Sophiae, Reich. 
sophie, Sclat. 
sophia, Bonap. 
Chlorestes Sophiae, Reich. 
Trochilus ( ?) caligatus, Gould. 
Hemithylaca Sophiae, Cab. et Hein. 
Hoffmanni, Cab. et Hein. 


Habitat. Costa Rica, Veragua, and New Granada. 


163 


359. SAUCEROTTIA WARSZEWICZI. 
*Hemithylaca Warszewiczi, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. 
p. 38. 
Habitat. Banks of the River Magdalena. 


As the S. Sophie differs from the S. typica in the richer blue 
colouring of its upper and under tail-coverts and tail, so does this 
species differ from the S. Sophie in having the tail and its coverts 
both above and beneath of a still richer and more violet blue. It is 
also of smaller size; and the green of its under surface is different 
from that of both, being purer and deeper. The examples in my 
collection were obtained by M. Warszewicz on the banks of the 
Magdalena. 


The bird to which M. Bourcier has given the specific name of 
cyantfrons requires separation from the last three species, as much 
or more than they do from their predecessors the Erythronote. 
M. Cabanis’s generic name of Hemithylaca having been applied to 
this group as a whole, subsequently to those of Saucerottia and 
Erythronota, | must either place his name in the rank of a synonym 
or adopt it for the present species, the only one of this particular 
form. 

Genus Hemituyraca, Cab. 


360. HeMITHYLACA CYANIFRONS. 
Saucerottia cyanifrons - - + + + > Vol. V. Pl. CCCXXIII. 


Trochilus cyanifrons, Boure. 

Polytmus cyanifrons, Gray & Mitch. 
Thalurania cyanifrons, Bonap. 
Saucerottia cyanifrons, Bonap., Reichenb. 
Chlorestes cyanifrons, Reichenb. 


* Hemithylaca cyanifrons, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 39. 
Yy y' Pp 


Habitat. New Granada. 


Somewhat allied to the genera Hemithylaca and Erythronota is 
the isolated form constituting my genus Eupherusa. The single 
species known is a native of Central America. Contrary to what 
occurs among the Erythronota, the sexes differ very considerably in 


their plumage ; a fact of which I was not aware when my plate of the — 


species was executed. 
Genus Eupnervusa, Gould. 
(Ed, bené, feliciter ; et pépovca, gestans.) 


Male.—Bill nearly straight and longer than the head; wing 
rather long ; éail rounded ; tarsi clothed; feet small; hind toe rather 
shorter than the middle toe. 

Female.—Unadorned. 


961. EUpHERUSA EXIMIA + + * + + Vol. V. Pl. COCXXIV 
Trochilus eximius, Delatt. 


164 


Saucerottia eximia, Reich., Bonap. 
*Amazilia eximia, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 8, pl.776. fig. 4802. 


Habitat. Guatemala and Honduras? 


Mr. Salvin states that “ This is one of the commonest Humming- 
Birds of Coban, being found everywhere near the city. The ratio 
of the males to the females is as ten to four.”—Jbis, vol. ii. Pecans, 

The following is a correct description of the female of this 
species :-— 

Throat and all the under surface grey; sides of the neck and 
upper surface green; primaries purplish brown ; secondaries deep 
buff, forming epaulets as in the male, but of lesser size. 


The 
Genus CurysuROoNIA, Bonap., 


is composed of six species, with pretty, golden tails. The females 
of most of them are strikingly different ; for, although they all have 
the tail similarly coloured, they are destitute of brilliancy on any 
part of the body. All are inhabitants of the Andes in New Granada, 
Ecuador, and Peru, with the exception of the C. Hlicie, which in- 
habits countries to the northward of Panama. 


362. CHrysurontA CGinont. . . . . Vol. V. Pl. CCCKXYV. 


Ornismya Oenone, Less., Delatt. 

Polytmus GQnone, Gray & Mitch. 

Chrysuronia enone, Bonap., Sclat. 

-——-—-——.._Jenone, Reichenhs 
* Cynanthus Oenone, Jard. Nat. Lib. HummirgBirds, vol. ii. p 149. 
* Chrysurisca Oenone, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p- 42. 


Habitat. Venezuela and New Granada. 


, _ I find no difference between the birds from Venezuela and those 
) from the neighbourhood of Bogota, except that the latter have rather 
_ longer bills, and the tail-feathers lighter and inclined to green. 


" 363. CHRYSURONIA JosEPHINE shan VebsVurbh COCK Bi 


Ornismyia Josephine, Boure. et Muls. 
Trochilus Josephine, Gray & Mitch. 
Chrysuronia Josephinae, Reichenb., Bonap. 
*Chrysurisca Josephinae, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p- 42," 
note. 


Habitat. The upper parts of the River Amazon, where specimens 
were procured by Mr. Bates. 


I have two specimens of a bird of this form in my collection, one 
of which, procured in Paris, is labelled “ O. neera, Less.;” they 
differ from every other species I possess. They are much larger 
than C. Josephine, and their tails are rich fiery bronze ; their crowns 
greenish blue; all the under surface golden green ; the under tail- 
coverts fiery bronze like the tail; and the blue of the crown extends 


165 


further down the neck. I therefore retain the name of neera for this 
bird. I have still another bird allied to Josephine, with a longer 
wing, a shorter tail, and a somewhat shorter bill; the colour of the 
crown is violet or purplish-blue instead of greenish-blue, and the tail, 
instead of being rich fiery bronze, is light greenish bronze. I can- 
not do otherwise than provisionally name this bird, and I therefore 
propose to call it C. eeruleicapilla. 


364. CHRYSURONIA NEERA. 
Ornysmia neera, Less. Delatt. et Less. Rev. Zool. 1839, p. 18. 


Habitat. Unknown. 


265. CHRYSURONIA CHRULEICAPILLA, Gould. 
Habitat. Unknown. 


366. CurysuroniA Humsotpt1 . . Vol. V. Pl. CCCXXVIL. 


Trochilus Humboldti, Bourc. et Muls. 
Chrysuronia Humboldti, Reichenb., Bonap. 
*Chrysurisca Humboldti, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 42, 


note. 


Habitat. The banks of the River Miva in the province of Esme- | 


raldas in Ecuador. 


367. CurysuronIA Evicim. . . ~ Vol. V. Pl. CCCXXVIII. 


Trochilus Elicia, Bourc. et Muls. 

Polytmus Elicia, Gray & Mitch. 

Chrysuronia elicia, Bonap. 

—_—— —— Hliciae, Reichenb., Bonap. 
* Chrysurisca Eliciae, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 42. 


Habitat. Guatemala, Costa Rica, and Veragua. 


368. CurysURONIA CHRYsURA . . .. Vol. V. Pl. CCCXXIX. 


Ornismya chrysura, Less. 
Chrysuronia chrysura, Bonap., Reichenb. 
Polytmus chrysura, Gray & Mitch. | . 
* Phaéthornis? chrysurus, Jard. Nat. Lib. Humming Birds, vol. ii. 
pe oz. 
* Chrysurisca chrysura, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 42, 
note. 


Habitat. Peru. 


Rich and conspicuous blue is the prevailing tint in the genera 
Eucephala and Hylocharis, which may be considered as truly 
Brazilian, since most of the species are natives of that country, 
almost the only exception being the E. Gray, which is found in the 
Andes. ‘There is scarcely any section of the Trochilidz less under- 
stood or more difficult to discriminate tian the next six or eight 


species. 


166 
Genus EucerpHaLa, Reichenb. 


369. Eucepnata Grayi. . . . . + Vol. V. Pl. CCCXXX. 
Trochilus Grayi, Delatt. et Boure. 
Hylocharis Grayti, Gray & Mitch., Bonap. 
Eucephala Grayi, Reichenb. 
Sapphironia grayi, Bonap. 
*Hucephala Grrayi, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p, 43. 
Habitat. Said to be Popayan in New Granada. 


This is the largest species of the genus, and a very rare bird. 


370. EUCEPHALA SMARAGDO-CERULEA, Gould. 
Vol. V. Pl. CCCXXXI. 


Augasma smaragdineum, Gould. 
Habitat. Brazil, from Rio de Janeiro towards the interior. 


371. PuCHPRALA CHLOROCEPHALA. . Vol. V. Pl. CCCX XXII. 


Hylocharis chlorocephala, Boure. 

— chlorocephalus, Bonap. 
Agyriria chlorocephala, Reichenb. 
Lepidopyga chlorocephala, Cab. et Hein. 


Habitat. The environs of Guaranda in Ecuador, according to M. 
Bourcier. 


372. EUCEPHALA CHRULEO-LAVATA, Gould. 


Vol. V. Pl. CCCX XXIII. 
Habitat. South-eastern Brazil. 


373. EUCEPHALA SCAPULATA, Gould. 
Habitat. Supposed to be Cayenne. 


Crown of the head, back of the neck, and lower part of the back 
very deep dull green; throat and chest glittering greenish blue, 
imperceptibly passing into the dull brownish black of the abdomen ; 
under tail-coverts brown, with a wash of dull blue in the centre of 
each feather; a mark of blue on each side at the insertion of 
the wing, forming an indistinct band across the back; upper tail- 
coverts bronzy green; tail steely black, rather short for the size of 
the bird, and slightly forked; wings deep purplish brown; tarsi 
clothed with intermingled greyish-white and brown feathers ; upper 
mandible black; basal half of the under mandible fleshy, the apical 
half black. 

Total length 32 inches, bill , wing 2/5, tail 13. 
In the size of its body, it nearly equals the Hucephala ceruleo- 
lavata, but it differs from that and every other known species of 

this family of birds, 

I have only seen a single example of this species. 


374. EUCEPHALA HYPOCYANEA, Gould Vol. V. Pl. CCCXXXIV. 
Habitat. Unknown, probably Brazil. 


167 


375. EUCEPHALA CHRULEA + + > ® Vol. V. Pl. CCCXXXV. 


Trochilus ceruleus, Vieill. 
Ornismya Audeberti, Less., Boure. 
Hylocharis cerulea, Gray. ; 
— ceruleus, Bonap. 
Thaumatias eeruleus, Bonap. 
Chlorestes coerulea, Reichenb. 
* Chlorestes caeruleus, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 46, note. 
*Trochilus Audeberti, Wied, Beitr. iv. p. 67. 
* Cynanthus ? ceruleus, Sard. Nat. Lib. Humming Birds, vol. ii. 


p- 147. 
* Hylocharis Audeberti, Burm. Th. Bras. tom. ii. p. 349. 


Habitat. Eastern and Northern Brazil (Chamicuros, Hauxwell), 
the Guianas, Venezuela, Trinidad, and Tobago. 


Specimens from all these localities are so much alike that it is | 
impossible to consider them otherwise than as one and the same spe- | ° 
cies; but 1 may remark that those from Venezuela have the blue \ 


mark on the chin much less apparent than those from Cayenne, 
Trinidad, and Eastern Brazil. My Chamicuros specimen also has 
this colour but faintly indicated, and the tail somewhat larger. 


376. EUCEPHALA CYANOGENYS. 


* Trochilus cyanogenys, Wied, Beitr. iv. p. 10; Jard. Nat. Lib. 
Humming Birds, vol. ii. p. 89; Burm. Their. Bras. tom. ii. 


p- 350. 

* Ornismya Wiedii, Less. Supp. Hist. Nat. des Ois.-mou. p. 150, 
pl. 26. 

*Cynanthus cyanogenys, Jard. Nat. Lib. Humming Birds, vol. ii. 
p. 148. 

* Hylocharis cyanogenys, Gray, Gen. of Birds, vol. i. p. 115, Hylo- 
charis, sp. 40. 

* Sauceroitia cyanogenys, Bonap. Gen. Av. tom. i. p. 77, Sauce- 
rottia, sp. 3. 

+ Hylocharis wiedi, Bonap. Rev. et Mag. de Zool. 1854, p. 255. 

* Chlorestes cyanogenys, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 7; Id. Troch. 
Enum. p. 4, pl. 692. figs. 4536-37 ; Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. 
Theil iii. p. 46. 

Habitat. Brazil. 


The single example of this bird procured by Prince Maximilian 
of Wied is the only one that has been seen. It is very closely allied 
to, but smaller than, Z. cerulea. 


Genus Pantrerre, Cab. 


This generic name has been proposed by M. Cabanis for the beau- 
tiful new bird discovered by Dr. Hoffmann in Costa Rica, of which 
I believe only a single example was obtained. Nothing is known 
with regard to the colouring of the sexes. 


3977, PANTERPE INSIGNIS, Cab... . Vol. V. Pl. CCCXXXVI. 
Habitat. Costa Rica. 


168 


The member or membefs, as the case may be, of the 
Genus JutiamyiA, Bonap., 


stand quite alone and apart from all the other small Humming-Birds, 
and bear the same relationship to the Eucephale that the Spheno- 
proctus Pampa does to the Campylopteri. Some of the specimens of 
this form have brilliantly glittering crowns; in others this part of the 
head is dull-coloured; while the plumage of the body is alike in all. 

These differences have sadly perplexed me for many years; but 
after a very careful and minute examination of a great number of 
examples from various localities, I believe I shall be right in regard- 
ing the brilliantly coronetted bird as distinct from its dull-crowned 
ally, and in adopting the name of Feliciana of Lesson, believing that 
his description has reference to it. 


378. JULIAMYIA TYPICA . . . . « Vol. V. Pl. CCCXXXVIL 
Ornismyia Julie, Boure. 
Ornismya Julia, Boure. 
Hylocharis Julia, Gray & Mitch. 
Damophila Julia, Reichenb. 
Juliamyia typica, Bonap. 
*Coeligena Juliae, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 3, pl. 681. figs. 
4494-95, and pl. 763. fig. 4767. 
*Damophila Juliae, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil ili. p. 40. 
Habitat. New Granada. 


379. JULIAMYIA FELICIANA. 


* Ornismya Feliciana, Less. Rev. Zool. 1844, p. 433, 
*Hylocharis Feliciana, Gray & Mitch. Gen. of Birds, vol. i. p. 114, 
Hylocharis, sp. 27. 


Habitat. Ecuador. 


Mr. Fraser states that at Babahoyo this species is “ hot very 
common, and only found in the deep bush, where it feeds on the 
tops of good-sized trees,” and that in Esmeraldas it was “taken 
catching flies among the Cacao plantations. In October éommon 
everywhere ; in December rare.” “ Irides hazel; upper mandible 
black ; lower red, with black tip."—Proc. of Zool. Soc. 1860, pp. 
283, 296. 


The Mexican genus Circe comprehends, as far as our present 
knowledge extends, only two species. Although their tails are 
somewhat short, they are composed of broad and ample feathers, all 
of which are tipped with grey: in this respect they remind us of 
the Chlorolampis Caniveti and its allies. 


Genus Circe, Gould. 
(Kipen, Circe.) 
Generic characters. 
Male.— Bill rather longer than the head, slightly curved and 


169 


tapering towards the tip ; wings rather long ; primaries rigid; tail 
rather short, and slightly forked, the feathers broad ; éarsz clothed ; 
feet small ; hind toe short; throat slightly luminous. 

Female.—Very dull in colour. 

The six middle tail-feathers of both species are edged with brown, 
as in Caniveti. 


380. Cimce ratirostris . . . . Vol. V. Pl. COCXXXVIII. 


Trochilus latirostris, Swains. 
Circe, Boure. 

Sapphironia circe, Bonap. 

Trochilus Schimperi, Saucer. MS. 
* Ornismya Lessoni, Delatt. Rev. Zool. 1839, p. 15 (female). 
* Trochilus lazulus, Licht. in Mus. of Berlin. 
* Cyanophaia lazula, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 10. 
* Hylocharis lazula, Reicheub. Troch. Enum. p. 8, pl. 770. figs. 

4783-84. 
—_———— Doubledayi, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 44, 


Habitat. The table-lands of Mexico. 


* 


My late friend Dr. Saucerotte gave me the type-specimen of his - 


Trochilus Schimperi with the name attached, by which means I am 
able to state that it is identical with the present bird, and not with 
the Trochilus lazulus of Vieillot as supposed by Dr, Reichenbach 
(see his Aufz. der Col. p. 21). 


381. Circe DousLEpDAYI . « - « + Vol. V. Pl. CCCXXXIX. 


Trochilus Doubledayi, Boure. 
Thaumatias doubleday?, Bonap. 
Cyanophaia Doubledayi, Reichenb, 

_ Hylocharis Doubledayi, Gray & Mitch. 
Sapphironia doubledayi, Bonap. 
Trochilus Lereboulleti, Sauc. MS. 


Habitat. Mexico; locality Chimantla, according to Dr, Saucerotte. 


Genus PumopTi.ta, Gould. 


(ads, obscurus, et z7iAov, pluma, ) 


Generic characters. 

Male.—Bill \onger than the head, fleshy at the base, and slightly 
arched ; wings of medium length ; tail the same, and slightly forked ; 
feet rather stout; Aind toe and nail shorter than the middle toe and 
nail. 


389, PHEHOPTILA sorpIDA, Gould . . . Vol. V. Pl. CCCXL. 


Cyanomyia? sordida, Gould. 
sordida, Sclat. 


Uranomitra sordida, Cab. et Hein. 
Habitat. Oaxaca in Mexico. 


170 


There is a specimen in the Loddigesian collection which appears 
to be distinct from this bird; without figuring I will give a descrip- 
tion, and propose for it the name of Pheoptila zonura. 


383. PHmopTiLa zoNURA, Gould. 

Habitat. Bolanos in Mexico. 

This bird, which is rather smaller and more delicately formed than 
P. obscura, has all the upper surface dull bronzy green; a stripe of 
greyish white over each eye; ear-coverts dusky; wings purplish 
brown; two centre tail-feathers bronzy green; the remainder 
bronzy green, crossed near the extremity with a broad band of 
blackish brown, beyond which the tips are greyish brown; all the 
under surface grey. ; 


The single species of the 
Genus DamopuiLa, Reichenb., 


stands quite alone, no second member of the form having yet been 
discovered. Its native country is the Andes of New Granada and 
Ecuador, from both of which localities specimens are now before 
me. Those procured by Mr. Fraser in Esmeraldas differ a little from 
the specimens commonly sent in collections from Bogota, in having 
the centre of the throat greyish brown instead of black, and the two 
centre tail-feathers reddish purple instead of bronzy green; they must 
not, however, I think, be regarded as other than local varieties. Mr. 
Fraser’s specimens appear not to be fully adult. 


384. DAMOPHILA AMABILIS, Gould. . . Vol. V. Pl. CCCXLI. 


Trochilus ( ?) amabilis, Gould. 
Damophila amabilis, Reichenb. 
Juliamyia amabilis, Bonap. 
*Coeligena amabilis, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 3, pl. 681. figs. 
4496-97. 
* Damophila amabilis, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iti. p. 40. 


Habitat. New Granada and Ecuador. 

I am not quite certain that we are acquainted with the true female 
of this bird, but I believe my representation of that sex to be cor- 
rect; if so, the sexes are very dissimilar in colouring, and in this 
respect are closely allied to the Hueephale.. 


Boié, one of the most philosophical of modern ornithologists, pro- 
posed the generic term of Hylocharis for the Trochilus sapphirinus 
of Gmelin ; and I have much pleasure in adopting this name, as well 
as several others proposed by him. The 


Genus Hytocuaris, Boié, 


is composed of three species, all of which are natives of Brazil, to 
which country they are mainly confined. They are all very pretty, 
if not showy, species; and one of them is among the oldest-known 
members of the entire family, as will be seen on reference to the 


171 


synonyms ; brilliant blue is the prevailing colour of the males, while 
the opposite sex is but plainly attired. 


385. HyLocHARIS SAPPHIRINA - Vol. V. Pl. CCCXLIL. 


Trochilus sapphirinus, Gmel., Lath., Shaw, Jard. 
Ornismya sapphirina, Less. 
Hylocharis sapphirina, Gray & Mitch. 
+ sapphirinus, Bonap. ; 
Trochilus fulvifrons, Lath. 
* Trochilus sapphirinus, Vieill. Ency. Méth. Orn. part ii. p. 5705 
Licht. Doubl. p. 14. 
. latirostris, Wied, Beit. iv. p. 64. 
—*Cynanthus sapphirinus, Jard. Nat. Lib. Humming Birds, vol. ii. 
p- 147. 
* Hylocharis latirostris, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 10. 
* Sapphironia sapphirina, Bonap. Rev. et Mag. de Zool. 1854, 
p. 256. 
* Hylocharis sapphirina, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 7, pl. 769. 
figs. 4780-82; Burm. Th. Bras. tom. ii. p. 346 ; Cab. et Hein. 


Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 43. 
_ Habitat. Brazil. 
This species arrives in the neighbourhood of Rio de Janeiro in 
July, and departs again in November. I have also seen specimens 
from Bahia, Para, and other parts on the Lower Amazon. 


386. HyLocHARIS LACTEA. + + + + Vol. V. Pl. CCC XLII. 


Ornismya sapphirina, Less. 
; lactea, Less. 
Hylocharis lactea, Gray & Mitch. Bonap. 
Cyanochloris lactea, Reich. 
Sapphironia lactea, Bonap. 
* Trochilus sapphirinus, Wied, Beit. iv. p. 61. 
x. /azulinus, Licht. in Mus. of Berlin. 
* Hylocharis lactea, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 43, note ; 
Reich. Troch. Enum. p. 8, pl. 773. figs. 4788-91. 


Habitat. Eastern and Northern Brazil. 


387. HyLocHARIS GvANRS COR Ae VOR. Ns Re CCCXLIV. 


Trochilus cyaneus, Vieill., Jard. 
Ornismya cyanea, Less. 

Hylocharis cyanea, Gray & Mitch. 
Thaumatias cyaneus, Bonap. 

* Trochilus azureus, Licht. Doubl. p. 14. 

*Hylocharis cyanea, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 10; Id. Troch. 
Enum. p. 7, pl. 768. figs. 4777-79; Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. 
Theil iii. p. 44. 

* Ornismyz bicolor, Less. Hist. Nat.des Ois.-mou. p.161, pl. 49, 507? 
Id. Traité d’Orn. p. 280?? Id. Les Troch. p. 58, pl. 16? ? 


Habitat. Eastern Brazil fiom Rio Janeiro to Bahia, where it is 
stationary. 


172 


Next to Hylocharis I place the two species of the 
Genus Sappuironia, Gonap. ; 


for although one of them has a glittering green breast, I consider it 
to be more nearly allied to that form than to the Chlorostilbontes 
and their allies. They are very elegant in form, and I believe that 
the females of both species differ very considerably from the males. 
I consider this genus to be a very natural one; yet, strange to say, 
one of the species (S. ceruleigularis) has a blue breast, while the 
other is wholly green. 

Both are natives of the Andes—one in Central America, the other 
in New Granada. 


388. SAPPHIRONIA GoupOTE . + ~- . Vol. V. Pl. CCCXLV. 


Trochilus Goudoti, Boure. 
Saucerottia goudoti, Bonap, 
Polyimus Goudoti, Gray & Mitch. 
Chalybura Goudoti, Reichenb. 
Hylocharis goudoti, Bonap., Sclat. 
*Agyrtria Goudoti, Reichenb, Thoch. Enum. p. 7, pl. 763. figs. 
4765-66. 
*Lepidopyga Goudoti, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 40, 


note. 
Habitat. New Granada. 


389. SAPPHIRONIA CHRULEIGULARIS, Gould. 
Vol. V. Pl. CCCXLVI. 


Trochilus (—?) ceruleogularis, Gould. 
Duchassaigni, Boure. 
Thalurania Celina. Bourc. 
Cyanochloris ceruleigularis, Reichenb. 
Sapphironia ceruleigularis, Bonap. 
Hylocharis (2?) ceruleigularis, Sctat. 
*Agyrtria ceruleigularis, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 7, pl. 764. 
figs. 4768-69. 
* Trochilus cyanomelas, Licht. in Mus. of Berlin. 
* Cyanophaia caerulescens, “‘ Lodd.,” Reichenb. in Mus. Heinean. 
*Hylocharis caerulescens, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 8, pl. 770. 
fig. 4785. 
*Lepidopyga caeruleigularis, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. 
p. 40. 


Habitat. Costa Rica and Panama. 


I now proceed to the genus 


Sporapinus, Bonap., 


the members of which are confined to the West India Islands. They 
are very elegant in form, and are of somewhat large size when com- 
pared with those which precede and follow them. They have deeply- 
forked tails, and the under surfaces of the males are brilliantly co- 
loured ; the females, on the other hand, are very sombrely attired. 


173 


390. SPORADINUS ELEGANS + + * > Vol. V. Pl. CCCXLVILI. 


Trochilus elegans, Aud. et Vieill. 

Ornismya Swuinsonii, Less. 

Hylocharis elegans, Gray & Miteh: 

Lampornis elegans, Bonap. 

Riccordia elegans, Reichenb. 

Sporadinus elegans, Bonap. 
*Trochilus Swainsoni, Jard. Nat. Lib. Humm. Birds, vol. ii. p. 88. 
* Chlorestes elegans, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 4, pl. 704. f. 4587. 
* Sporadinus elegans, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iti. p. 25. 


Habitat. The Island of St. Domingo. © 


291. Sporapinus RicorpD! 


Orthorhynchus Ricordi, De la Sag. 
Ornismya Parzudhaki, Less. 
Sporadinus ricordi, Bonap. 
Hylocharis Ricordi, Gray & Mitch. 
Trochilus ricordi, Gerv., Bonap. 
Riccordia Raimondi, Reichenb. 
Chlorestes riccordi, Gundl. 
* Chlorestes Raimondii, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 4, pl. 704. figs. 
4584-86. 
* Sporadinus Ricordi, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 25, note. 


Habitat, The Island of Cuba. 


3992. Spornapinus? Maucmir . . . » Vol. V. Pl. CCCXLIX. 


Mellisuga Surinamensis pectore ceruleo, Briss. 
Trochilus Maugeus, Vieill. 
Ornismya Maugeus, Less. 
Trochilus Ourissia, auct.°? 


Habitat. Porto Rico. 


This bird differs somewhat in form from the two preceding spe- 
cies, and it may be found necessary to institute a separate genus for 
its reception. It is a very rare bird, and the two specimens, male 
and female, in the collection at the Jardin des Plantes at Paris are 
the only ones I have ever seen. : 


Vol. V. Pl. CCCXLVIII. 


The little glittering-green Humming-Birds forming the genera 
Chlorolampis, Chloristilbon, and Panychlora, are very widely spread 
over the temperate and warmer parts of the South American con- 
tinent, being found along the whole course of the great Andean 
range, from Mexico on the north to Bolivia on the south; they also 
inhabit Brazil, Cayenne, the Guianas, Trinidad, and Venezuela, 
The sexes differ very considerably in colour in nearly every species. 
the males being clothed in a metallic covering, while that of the 
females is soft in texture and sombre in hue. 

The members of the 


Genus CutoroLampls, Cab,, 


as restricted by me, are distinguished for their deeply forked tails, 
N 


174: 


most of the feathers of which are singularly tipped with dull grey. 
They range over a great part of Mexico, Guatemala, Costa Rica, 
Veragua, and Panama, where they apparently terminate, as I have 
never received examples from any part southward of the isthmus. 
The finest species of the genus is the C. auriceps, a bird of very 
elegant form, and having a deeply forked tail; most nearly allied to 
this is the C. Caniveti: both these birds are from Mexico. Follow- 
ing these is the little bird I have named C. Osberti, after Mr. Osbert 
Salvin; a fourth, from Costa Rica, has been described by Dr. Caba- 
nis as C. Salvini, after the same gentleman. Very considerable dif- 
ference occurs in the sexes, but more in colour than in form; for the 
females have the tail forked like that of the males, but to a much 
less extent. 


393. CHLOROLAMPIS AURICEPS. 
Chlorostilbon auriceps, Gould . . . ~ Vol. V. Pl. CCCL. 


Trochilus (— ?) auriceps, Gould. 
*Sporadinus auriceps, Bonap. Rev. et Mag. de Zool. 1854, 
p. 255. 
* Trochilus modestus, Licht. in Mus. of Berlin ? 
. *Chlorolampis auriceps, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. p. 48, note. 


Habitat, Mexico: locality unknown. 


394. CHLOROLAMPIS CANIVETI. 
Chlorostilhon Caniveti. . . . .».-..« Wel. V, Pl. CCCLI. 


Ormismya Canivetii, Less. 
Thaumatias caniveti, Bonap. 
Riccordia Caniveti, Reichenb. 
Sporadinus caniveti, Bonap. 
Hylocharis Caniveti, Gray & Mitch. 
Chlorostilbon Caniveti, Sclat. & Salv. 
*Chlorestis Caniveti, Troch. Enum. p. 4, pl. 703. figs. 4581-83. 
* Chlorolampis Caniveti, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 47, 
note. 


Habitat. Southern Mexico and Guatemala? 


395. CHLOROLAMPIS OszseErtI, Gould. _ 
Chlorostilbon Osberti, Gould . . .°. Vol. V. Pl. CCCLII. 
Habitat. The neighbourhood of Duefias in Guatemala. 


396. CHLoRLAMPIS SALvin1, Cab. 
Chlorolampis Salvini, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 48. 
Habitat. Costa Rica according to Dr. Cabanis. 


| The C. Salvini is nearly allied to C. Osberti and to C. Caniveti, 
| but I believe it to be distinct from both. The freshly moulted adult 
males have their four central tail-feathers tipped with bronzy-green ; 


but this colour appears to fade upon exposure to light, leaving the 
tail nearly black. { believe this bird is also found at Panama. 


175 


Genus CuiorostiLson, Gould. 
(XAwpds, viridis, et oriABw, corusco.) 


Under this generic appellation, for a form of which I always in- 
tended the C. prasinus to be the type, I have figured the whole of 
the little green Humming-Birds; but I uow see the necessity of 
subdividing them; I shall therefore restrict the term to the follow- 
ing species—angustipennis, Haeberlint, Phaéthon, aureiveniris, pra- 
sinus, Atala, brevicaudatus, Napensis, Peruanus, Daphne, and 
chrysogaster, and adopt Dr. Cabanis’s genus Panychlora for Alicia, 
euchloris, Poortmanni, and stenura. 


397. CHLOROSTILBON ANGUSTIPENNIS . Vol. V. Pl. CCCLIT. 


Trochilus angustipennis, Fras. 
Hylocharis angustipennis, Gray & Mitch. 


Habitat. Panama and New Granada. 


398. CHLOROSTILBON HAEBERLINI. 

* Chlorolampis chrysogaster, Cab, et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil ii. 
p- 47. 

* Trochilus Haeberlinii, Licht. in Mus. of Berlin. 

* Chlorestes Haeberlinii, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 7; Id. Troch. 
Enum. p. 4, pl. 703. fig. 4578-80. 

* Chlorolampis Haeberlini, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. 

_~p. 48, note. 


Habitat. Carthagena. 


I have had the original of C. Haeberlini sent to me from Berlin, 
and I find it to be a very elegantly formed bird, nearly allied to, 
but quite distinct from, C. angustipennis. It differs in having the 
glittering green of the under surface washed with blue, a shorter 
wing, and a still more deeply forked tail, the feathers of which are 
steely-green, and not so dark as in that species. It is said to be 
from Carthagena. 


399. CHLOROSTILBON PHAETHON . . + Vol. V. Pl. CCCLIV. 


Trochilus Phaéthon, Boure. 

Pheton, Gray & Mitch. 
Chlorestes Phaéthon, Reich. 
Hylocharis phaéton, Bonap. 

similis, Bonap. 
Chloroiampis Phaéthon, Cab. et Hein. 
Trochilus flavifrons, Gould. 
metallicus, Gould. 

Trochilus similis, Boure.? 


Habitat. Bolivia, Southern Brazil, and La Plata. 


—— 


Since writing my account of this species, in which I expressed my 
belief that the Ornismyia aureiventris of D’Orbigny and Lafresnaye 
was identical with it, I have carefully re-examined my specimens from 
the above-named countries, together with an example collected by 

N@ 


i76 


Mr. Bridges, and I am now inclined to believe the O. aureiventris tu 
be distinct ; but as it merely differs in being of smaller size in all its 
admeasurements, it will not be necessary for me to figure it. 


400. CHLOROSTILBON AUREIVENTRIS. 
Ornismyia aureiventris, D’Orb. et Lafresn. 
Hylocharis auretventris, Bonap., Rev. et Mag. de Zool. 1854, 
p- 255. 
Habitat. Bolivia and Peru. 


401. CHLOROSTILBON PRASINUS. . . . Vol. V. Pl. CCCLV. 


* Trochilus Pucherani, Boure. et Muls. Rev. Zool. 1848, tom ii. 
pei la 

*Hylocharis pucherani, Bonap. Rev. et Mag. de Zool. 1854, 
p. 255. 

* Chlorestes Pucherani, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 7; Id. Troch. 
Enum. p. 4, pl. 755. fig. 4736. 

* Trochilus nitidissimus, Licht. in Mus. of Berlin. 

* Hylocharis prasina, Burm. Th. Bras. tom. ii. p. 350. 

* Chlorestes nitidissimus, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p:7; Id. Troch. 
Enum. p. 4, pl. 693. figs. 4538-39. 

* Trochilus lamprus, “ Natt.” in Mus. of Munich. 

* Chlorostilbon nitidissimus, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. 
p- 47. 

*Ornismya Galathea, Bourc. et Muls. in Mus. of Paris. 


* Trochilus viridissimus, Linn. in Mus. of Berlin (young). 


In my account of this species I stated that, owing to its being 
impossible to determine to what bird Lesson had given the name of 
prasinus, I should apply it to the one generally known by that 
term among collectors—the bird so common in the neighbourhood of 
Rio de Janeiro, Minas Geraes, &c. From Dr. Cabanis we learn 
that it has been named Trochilus nitidissimus by Lichtenstein in 
the Museum of Berlin, and T’rochilus lamprus, Natt. in the Museum 
of Munich; but had either of these names been published to the 
world before Dr. Cabanis included it in his ‘Museum Heineanum’ 
under the name of Chlorostilbon nitidissimus? If not, and pra- 
sinus be rejected, that term must certainly give place to M. Bour- 
cier’s previously published one of Pucherani, which I find, from the 
type specimen now before me, was given to a young male of this 
species. Refer to my account of this species, and of C. Atala. 


402. CHLOROSTILBON IGNEUS, Gould. 
Habitat. Supposed to be the neighbourhood of Para. 


Crown of the head glittering orange; back of the neck and upper 
surface fiery orange, becoming more intense on the wing-coverts ; 
throat and chest glittering bluish green, gradually passing into the 
fiery orange of the flanks and abdomen; under tail-coverts green, 
tinged with orange; wings purplish brown; tail purplish black ; bill 
fleshy red at the base, gradually passing into the black of the tip. 


177 


This bird is about the same size as C. prasenus, but differs from 
that species in the fiery colouring above described, and in the tail 
being purplish- instead of steel-black. 

This is the bird mentioned in my account of C. prasinus as 
having been sent to me by Mr. Reeves, of Rio de Janeiro. It is one 
of the most beautiful species of the family. 


403. CHLOoROSTILBON ATALA - ~~ ~- Vol. V. Pl. CCCLVI. 


Ornismya Atala, Less. ? 
prasina, Less. ? 
Hylocharis atala, Gray & Mitch. 
Saucerottia Atala, Reichenb., Bonap. 
Trochilus Mellisugus, Linn. 
* Chlorestes Atala, Reichenbach, Trochil. Enum. p. 4, pl. 700. 
fig. 4568. 


Habitat. The Island of Trinidad and Venezuela. 


‘I find that Venezuelan specimens differ a little from those of 
Trinidad, the green of the upper and under surface being more 
golden; still I have no doubt of their being identical. 


404. CHLOROSTILBON DAPHNE. 
Trochilus Daphne, Bource. 


Habitat. Peru. 


I consider this to be a distinct species: it is very nearly allied to | 
the Cayenne bird C. Atala of this work; but it has a more square | 
tail, with the green of the chest strongly tinged with blue. I have 


M. Bourcier’s type, which is labelled ‘ Voyage de Castelnau, Pampas 
del Sacramento.’ 


405. Curorostitson Pervanus, Gould. 
Habitat. Peru. 


Bill black; crown, throat, and all the under surface glittering 
oerange-green; upper surface bronzy green; wings brown; tail 
purplish black. 

Total length 32 inches, bill 3, wing 14, tail 14. 

This, one of the black-billed species, has even a more rounded 
tail than C. Daphne, from which it differs in its larger size and 
in having a longer bill, and especially in the glittering orange- 
green colouring of its breast, which in C, Daphne is blue. The 
C. chrysogaster has a somewhat forked steely-black tail ; in other 
respects the two birds are very similar. 


406. CHLOROSTILBON Narensis, Gould. 
Habitat. The banks of the River Napo. 


This. species is very similar to, but smaller than C. Daphne, has 
a still shorter tail, and the blue of the breast not so extended, or 
confined to the throat. 


178 


407. CHLOROSTILBON BREVICAUDATUS, Gould. 
Habitat. Cayenne. 
This bird is very similar to the C. Atala of Trinidad, has the 


-same glittering green-coloured breast, but has a short and more 
truncate-formed tail, more so than C. Daphne or C. Napensis. 


408. CHLOROSTILBON CHRYSOGASTER. 


* Trochilus chrysogaster, Boure. Ann. Soc. Sci. Phys. et Nat. Lyon, 
1843, p.40; Id. Rev. Zool. 1843, p.101. 

* Hylocharis chrysogaster, Gray & Mitch. Gen.of Birds, vol. i. p. 115, 
Hylocharis, sp. 43; Bonap. Consp. Gen. Av. tom. i. p- 74, Hylo- 
charis, sp. 2. 

* Chlorestes chrysogaster, Reichenb. Aufz.der Col. p.7; Id. Troch. 
Enum. p. 4, pl. 693. figs. 4540-41. 

*_____. prasinus, feem. Id. ibid. pl.755. fig. 4'°737 ? 

* Trochilus puber, Siebold in Mus. Monae. (Cabanis). 

*Chlorolampis chrysogastra, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. 
p- 47. 

*Chlorostilbon melanorhynchus, Gould in Proce. of Zool. Soc, part 
XXVill. p. 308 ? 

* Chlorolampis smaragdina, Cab.et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p.48? 

* Chlorostilbon atala, Sclat. “ List of Birds collected by Mr. Fraser 
at Pallatanga,” in Proc. Zool. Soc. part xxvii. p. 145; Id. “ List 
of Birds coll. by Mr. Fraser at Puellaro,” in Proc. Zool. Soe. 
part xxvili. p. 94. 

Habitat. New Granada and Ecuador. 


In my description of C. angustipennis I stated that I considered the 
Trochtlus chrysogaster of M. Bourcier to be identical with that species; 
but I have since more closely investigated the matter, and I now 
believe that this opinion was an erroneous one. I also believe that 
the C. chrysogaster and my C’. melanorhynchus are one and the same 
bird ; for I find little or no difference in the specimens from Panama, 
New Granada, and Ecuador. I further think it likely that the C. sma- 
ragdina of MM. Cabanis and Heine’s ‘Museum Heineanum’ is also 
referable to it. 


409. CHLOROSTILBON ASSIMILIS, Lawr. 


Chlorostilbon assimilis, Lawr. Ann. of Lyc. of Nat. Hist. in New 
York, 1860, p. 292. 


Habitat. Panama. 


The following is Mr. Lawrence’s description of his C. assimilis 
and his remarks on the species :—“ The entire upper plumage is of 
bronze or dull golden-green; tail dark steel-blue; wings brownish 
purple; under plumage brilliant green, golden on the abdomen, 
and on the throat of a bluish green; under tail-coverts grass- 
green; a small white spot on the pleura; tibial feathers brown; bill 
and feet black. 

“Length 3 inches, wing 1}¢, tail 1,4, bill ,%. 


7g. 


“ This species is somewhat like C. melanorhynchus, Gould (chry- 
sogaster), but: is smaller, and the crown is uniform in colour with 
the back, not brilliant. The latter species is also more golden 
on the abdomen, and has the tail less forked, with the feathers 
narrower.” on 


410. CHLOROSTILBON NITENS, Lawr. 


- Chlorostilbon nitens, Lawr. Ann. Lye. Nat. Hist. New York,” 


April 22, 1861. 
“ Habitat. Venezuela. 


“Front and crown golden yellowish-green, very brilliant; back and 
wing-coverts shining bronzed green, lower part of back and upper 
tail-coverts shining grass-green ; under plumage brilliant green, of 
a bluish shade on the throat, and golden on the abdomen; tail steel- 
plue and forked ; wings brownish-purple ; tarsi clothed with blackish 
feathers; under tail-coverts bright grass-green; upper mandible 
black, the under yellowish for two-thirds its length, with the end 
black ; feet black. sa 

« Length 3 inches, wing 14, tail 14, bill =%. . 

vf Allied to C. chrysogaster, but is smaller, and has a very brilliant 
crown. ae 

Among the smallest of the Trochilide are the members of the 


form to which Dr. Cabanis has given the name of Panychlora. They 
are all inhabitants of New Granada and Venezuela, and are known 


by the specific names of Alicia, euchloris, Poortmanni, and stenura. 


They are distinguished by their dull-green colouring, the extreme 
shortness of their tails, and by the. great difference in the colouring 
of the sexes, - . 
a Genus PANYCHLORA, Cab. 
~ ‘The members of this genus form a very natural section among the 
little green Humming-Birds, very perceptible to those who have paid 
attention to this group of birds. 


411. PANYCHLORA ALICIA. 


Chlorostilbon Aliciee © - - + + > Vol. V. Pl. CCCLVU. 


Trochilus Alice, Bourc. 
' Smaragdites Alice, Reichenb. 

Chlorostilbon alice, Bonap. re cs lel 
*Chlorestes Aliciae, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 4; pl. 754. 

figs. 4732-33. ; 

* Trochilus erypturus, Licht. in Mus. of Berlin. 
* Panychlora Aliciae, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. p. 50, note. 
* aurata, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 50. 
* Smaragdites maculicollis, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p. 7. 


* Chlorestes maculicollis, Id. ibid. p. 24; Id. Troch. Enum. p. 4, 


pl. 694. figs-4545-46 5 Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil ili. p. 49, 


note. 
~ Habitat, Venezuela and New Granada. 


180 


412, PANYCHLORA EUCHLORIS. 


Smaragditis euchloris, Reichenb. Aufz. der Col. p.7. 
Chlorestes euchloris, Reichenb. ibid. p- 23; Id. Troch. Enum. p-4, 
pl. 694. fig. 4544. 


Habitat. New Granada ? 


There is a specimen in the Berlin Museum with a broken bill. In 
size it is rather larger than Alicia, the tail is more forked, and the 
two outer feathers more pointed; all the feathers have a purplish 
hue, as seen in Poortmanni, and the glittering feathers of the body 
are of a dull golden purplish green, as in that species. 


413. PANYCHLORA STENURA, Cab. 


* Panychlora stenura,Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii, p- 56, note. 
* Chlorostilbon acuticaudus, Gould in Proc. Zool. Soe. part xxviii. 
p- 308. 


Habitat. Merida in New Granada. 


This species is fully equal in size to the last, has a more length- 
ened bill, and the outer tail-feathers are much more pointed, 


414, Panycuiora PoortMANNI. 


Chlorostilbon Poortmanni. . . . . Vol. V. Pl. CCCLVIIL 
Ornismya Poortmani, Bourc. 
Hylocharis Poortmanni, Gray & Mitch., Bonap. 
Chlorestes Poortmanni, Reichenb. 
Chlorostilbon poortmani, Bonap. 
* Ornismya Esmeralda, Less. in Mus. Heinean. 
* Smaragditis Esmeralda, Reich. Auz. der Col. prvi 
* Chlorostilbon Esmeralda, Reichenb. Troch. Enum. p. 4, pl. 694. 
figs. 4549-43. 
* Panychlora Poortmanni, Cab. et Hein. Mus. Hein. Theil iii. p. 50. 


Habitat. New Granada, 


I shall close this account of the little green Humming-Birds with a 
description of the extraordinary species sent to me by Mr. Reeves of 
Rio de Janeiro, and which I have described in the ‘ Proceedings of 
the Zoological Society’ as Calliphlow ? iridescens. Its iridescent 
green colouring would indicate that it belongs to this section ; while 
its comparatively small wings and short. tail ally it to Calliphioz ; 
but as it is not strictly referable to either genus, I propose for it a 
separate distinctive appellation, and provisionally placed here the 


Genus SmAracpocurysis, Gould. 


(Xpdpaydos, smaragdus, et xpicos, aurum.) 
Generic characters. 
Male,— Bill longer than the head, straight and slender; wings 


small, primaries narrow and Tigid ; ¢ail of moderate size and deeply 


forked ; tarsi clothed ; feet small; hind-toe and nail nearly as long 
as the middle-toe and nail, 


18] 


415. SMARAGDOCHRYSIS IRIDESCENS, Gould Vol. V. Pl. CCCLIX. 


Calliphlox? iridescens, Gould in Proc. of Zool. Soc. part xxviii. 
p- 310. 


Habitat. The virgin forests of the interior of Brazil. 


Genus Putocopnitus, Gould. 
(BALE [proyes], nomen flore, et pidos, amicus. ) 


Generic characters. ; 

Male.—Bill straight; wings ample and rather rounded ; tars¢ 
long for a Humming-Bird, and bare; ¢aél rather large and rounded ; 
hind toe and nail shorter than the middle toe and nail. 

The specimen from which the above characters were taken differs 
from every other known Humming-Bird in its more lengthened tarsi, 
and in the colouring of its rounded tail. The bird, which is imma- 
ture, was received from the borders of the River Napo. 


416. PHLOGOPHILUS HEMILEUCURUS, Gould Vol. V. Pl. CCCLX. 


Phlogophilus hemileucurus, Gould in Proc. of Zool. Soc. part xxviii. 
p. 3L0. 


Habitat. The banks of the River Napo? 


In placing this bird at the end of my Monograph of the Trochilide, 
1 do not wish it to be understood that this is its proper situation. I 
cannot imagine what the adult will be like, and consequently cannot 
tell to which genus of the family it is allied; but 1 believe, to 
Adelomyia. 


Note.—In the body of the work, Columbia has been given as the 
habitat of many of the species; but in this Introduction, Venezuela, 
New Granada, and Ecuador have been substituted, as the case re- 
quired, for that more general term, A difference of opinion exists 
as to the correct spelling of New Granada,—some considering that it 
should be Grenada, and others Granada; the latter has been adopted 
in this Introduction, while in the body of the folio work it is usually, 
if not always, spelt Grenada. 


The Index to the specific names of Humming-Birds comprises 
every term of this kind with which I am acquainted. Among them 
are some which are not elsewhere mentioned in this Introduction ; 
these are the specific appellations occurring in the works of the 
older and a few of the more modern authors, which I have found it 
quite impossible to ascertain to what birds they have been applied. 
It is but fair to state that the Urolampra chloropogon of Cabanis 
and Heine, and the Chlorestes tolaimus of Reichenbach, appear 
from the descriptions and figures to be good species; but, as I have 
not seen the typical examples, [ am unable to speak positively 


See een aes at 


182 


respecting them ; I shall, however, keep the subject of the Hum- 
ming-Birds constantly before me, and, when desirable, place my 
remarks upon these, and any novelties that may occur, before the 
scientific world. 

At page 1I'I have stated that the Humming-Birds, like the Swifts, 
have ample wings and vast powers. of flight. As this may appear 
contradictory to the remarks made on the wing-powers of Selas- 
phorus ruber and Trochilus Colubris at p. 6, it will be as well to state, 
what I meant to convey is that their ample wings and bony structure 
is admirably adapted for sustaining them in the air for a considerable 
time, rather than for enabling them to take long flights from one 
country to another. 


EXPLANATION OF THE ABBREVIATIONS, 


AND 


LIST OF THE AUTHORS AND WORKS REFERRED TO. 


Albin.— Albin, Natural History of Birds. 

Aud. Birds of Am.— Audubon, Birds of America. 

Aud. Orn. Bio.—Audubon, Ornithological Biography. 

Aud. Syn. Birds of Am.—Audubon, Synopsis of the Birds of America. 

Aud. et Vieill.—Audebert et Vieillot, Oiseaux dorés, ou a reflets métalliques. 

Azara Voy. dans lAmér. Mér. Sonn. edit.—Azara, Voyage dans [ Amérique 

méridionale, Sonnini’s edition. te 

Banc. Hist. of Guiana.— Bancroft, Natural History of Guiana. 
Bodd.—Boddaert, Table de Planches enluminées d’ Histoire Naturelle de M. 

D’ Aubenton. 2 

Boie, in Oken’s Isis. 

Boiss. Mag. de Zool.—Boissoneau, in Magasin de Zoologie. 

Boiss. Rev. Zool.—Boissoneau, in Revue Zoologique. 

Bonap. Consp. Gen. Av.— Bonaparte, Conspectus Generum Avium. 

Bonap. Consp. Troch. in Rev. et Mag. de Zool.— Bonaparte, Conspectus Trochi- 
lorum, in Revue et Magasin de Zoologie. 

Bonap. Rev. et Mag. de Zool— Bonaparte, in Revue et Magasin de Zoologie. 

Bonap. Syn. Birds of U. States.—Bonaparte, Synopsis of the Birds of the United 
States. 

Bonn. et Vieill.—Bonnaterre and Vieillot, in. Tableau Encyclopédie Méthodique, 
Part II. Ornithologie. , 

Borowsk.—Borowski, Vogel. 

Boure. Aun. de la Soc. d’Agr. Hist. Nat. etc. de Lyon.—Bourcier,; in Annales de 
la Société d@ Agriculture, Histoire Naturelle, etc. de Lyon. 

Boure. Ann. Sci. Phys. et Nat.de Lyon.—Bourcier, in Annales des Sciences Phy- 
siques et Natwrelles de Lyon. 

Bourc. Compt. Rend. de l’Acad. des Sci.—Bourcier, in Comptes Rendus de 0 A- 
cadémie des Sciences. : 

Boure. in Proc. Zool. Soc.—Bourcier, in the Proceedings of the Zoological Society 
of London. 

Boure. Rev. Zool.—Bourcier, in Revue Zoologique. 

Boure. et Muls.—Bourcier e¢ Mulsant, in Revue Zoologique. : 

Boure. et Muls. Ann. de la Soc. Sci. de Lyons.—Bourcier and Mulsant, in 
Annales des Sciences Physiques et Naturelles de Lyon. 

Boure. et Muls. Ann. de I’Acad. Sci. Bell. Lett. et Arts de Lyon.—Bourcier, in 
Annales de V Académie des Sciences, Belles-Letires et Arts de Lyon. 

Boure. et Muls. Ann. de la Soc. Linn. de Lyon.—Bourcier and Mulsant, in 
Annales dela Société Linnéenne de Lyon. 

Brandt, Icon. Av. Ross.—Brandt, Descriptiones et Icones Animalium Rossi- 
corum, ete. 

Bridges, Proc. of Zool. Soc.—Bridges, in the Proceedings of the Zoological Society 
of London. . 


184 


Briss. Orn.— Brisson, Ornithologie. 

Brown. Nat. Hist. of Jam.—Browne, The Oivil and Natural History of Jamaica. 

Bryant, List of Birds seen at the Bahamas. 

Buff. Hist. Nat. des Ois—Buffon, Histoire Naturelle des Oiseaux. 

Buff. Sonn. edit.—Sonnin?’s edit. of Buffon’s Histoire Naturelle des Oiseaux. 

Buff. Pl. Enl.— Buffon’s Planches Enluminées. 

Burm. Th. Bras.—Burmeister, Systematische Uebersicht der Thiere Brasiliens. 

Cab. and Cab. et Hein.—Dr. Cabanis and Ferdinand Heine, Museum Heine-~ 
anum. 

Cab. or Cabanis in Rich. Schomb, Reisen in Brit, Guian.—Cabanis, in Schom- 
burgk’s Reisen in Britisch Guiana. 

Cabot in Proc. of Boston Soc. of Nat. Hist.—Cabot, in the Proceedings of the 
Boston Society of Natural History. 

Cassin, Ill, Birds of California—Cassin, Illustrations of the Birds of California. 

Cuv. Régn. Anim.— Cuvier, Regne Animal. 

Darwin, Zool. of Beagle—Darwin, The Zoology of the Voyage of H. M. 8. 
Beagle, Part IIL. Birds, by John Gould. 

Da Silva, Maia Minerva Brasiliensis. 

Delatt. Echo du Monde Savant.—Delattre, in L’ Echo du Monde Savant. 

Delatt. in Rev. Zool—Delattre, in Revue Zoologique. 

Delatt. et Boure. Rev. Zool.—Delattre and Bourcier, in Revue Zoologique. 

Delatt. et Less, Rev. Zool.—Delattre and Lesson, in Revue Zoologique. 

De Longuem. Rev. Zool.—De Longuemare, in Revue Zoologique. 

Dev. Rev. et Mag. de Zool— Deville, in Revue et Magasin de Zoologie. 

D’Orb. Voy. dans ’Amér. Mérid, Ois.—D’ Orbigny, Voyage dans ? Amérique 
Meéridionale + Oiseaux. 

D’Orb. et Lafres. Syn.—D’ Orbigny et Lafresnaye, Synopsis Avium: 

Drapiez, Dict. Class. d’Hist. Nat—Drapiez, in Le Dictionnaire Classique d’ His- 
toire Naturelle. 

Dubus, Esquisses Orn.— Dubus, Esquisses Ornithologiques. 

Dumont, Dict. Sci. Nat.—Dumont de St. Croix, in Le Dictionnaire des Sciences 
Naturelles. 

Edwards, Birds, or Nat. Hist. of Birds Edwards, Natural History of uncommon 
Birds, 

Edw. Glean. or Glean. of Nat. Hist.— Edwards, Gleanings of Natural History, 

Ferm. Surinam.—Fermin, Histoire Naturelle de Surinam. 

Fras. in Proc. Zool. Soc.—Fraser, in the Proceedings of the Zoological Society of 
London. , 

Gambel, Notes on Californian Birds, 

Gambel, in Proc. of Acad. Sci. Philad.— Gambel, in the Proceedings of the Aca- 
demy of Sciences of Philadelphia. 

Gerv. Mag. de Zool.— Gervais, in Le Magasin de Zoologie. 

Gmel, Linn, Syst. Nat.—Gmelin’s edition of Linneus’s Systema Nature. 

Gosse, Birds of Jamaica. 

Gosse, Il. Birds of Jam.— Gosse, Illustrations of the Birds of Jamaica, 

Gould, in Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist—Gould, in the Annals and Magazine of 
Natural History. 

Gould, in Jard. Contr. to Orn.— Gould, in Jardines Contributions to Ornitho- 


logy. 

Gould, Proe. Zool. Soc—Gould, in the Proceedings of the Zoological Society of 
London. ; 

Gould, in Rep. Brit. Assoc.—Gould, in the Report of the British Association. 

Gould, Zool. of Beagle.— Gould, in Zoology of the Voyage of H. M. 8. Beagle, 

. Part IIL. Birds. 
Gray, Cat. of Gen. and Sub-gen. of Birds in Brit. Mus.—G. R. Gray, Cata- 
logue of the Genera and Sub-genera of Birds contained in the British 

Musewm. 

Gray, List of Gen. of Birds.—G. R. Gray, List of the Genera of Birds. 

Gray and Mitch.— Gray and Mitchell, The Genera of Birds. 

Gundl. . Cab. Journ. fiir Orn.— Gundlach, in Cabanis’s Journal Siir Ornitho- 
ogie. 


185 


Hill, pees Mag. Nat. Hist.—Ail, in the Annals and Magazine of Natural 
astory. 

Jard. or Jardine in the Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist.—Jardine, in the Annals and 
Magazine of Natural History. _ 

Jard. Cont. to Orn.—Jardine, Contributions to Ornithology. : 

Jard. Nat. Lib. Humm. Birds.—Jardine, Naturalist’s Library, Humming-Birds. 

King in Proc. of Comm. of: Sci. and Corr. of Zool. Soc.—King, in the Proceed- 
ings of the Committee of Science and Correspondence of the Zoological 
Society of London. 

Klein Av. or Aves.—Klein, Historie Avium Prodromus. 

Lath. Gen. Hist.—Latham, General History of Birds. 

Lath. Gen. Syn.—Latham, General Synopsis of Birds. 

Lath. Ind. Orn.—Latham, Index Ornithologicus. 

Lawr. in Ann. Lye. Nat. Hist. New York.—Lawrence, in Annals of the Lyceum 
of Natural History in New York. 

Lembeye, Aves de l’Isle de Cuba. 

Léry, Voyage au Brésil. 

Tess. Ann. Sci. Nat.—Lesson, in Annales des Sciences Naturelles. 

Less. Col.—Lesson, Histoire Naturelle des Colibris. 

Less. Echo du Monde Savant.—Lesson, in ? Echo du Monde Savant. 

Less. Hist. Nat. des Col.—Lesson, Histoire Naturelle des Cokibris. 

Less. Hist. Nat. des Ois.-mou.—Lesson, Histoire Naturelle des Oiseaux-mouches. 

Less. Ill. Zool.—Lesson, Illustrations de Zoologie. 

Less. Ind. Gén. et Syn. des Ois, du Gen. Trochilus.—Lesson, Index Général et 
Synoptique des Oiseaux du Genre Trochilus, 

Less. Les. Troch.—Lesson, Les Trochilidées. 

Less. Man. @’Orn.—Lesson, Manuel @ Ornithologie. 

Less. Ois.-mou. Vélins.—Lesson’s unpublished additions to his Histoire Na- 
turelle des Oiseaux-mouches. 

Less. Rev. Zool:—Lesson, in Revue Zoologique. 


Less. Supp. Hist. Nat. des Ois.-mou.—Lesson, Supplément a P Histoire Natu- 


relle des Oiseaux-mouches. 

Less. Tab. des Esp. des Ois.-mou.—Lesson, Tableau des Espéces des Oiseauc- 
mouches. 

Less. Traité d’Orn.—Lesson, Traité d Ornithologie. 

Less. Voy. de la Coq.—Lesson, in Le Voyage de la Coquille. 

Less. et Delatt. Rev. Zool.—Lesson and De Lattre, in Revue Zoologique. 

Less. et Garn. Voy. de la Cog,—Lesson and Garnot, in Le Voyage de la Co- 


quille. 

Licht. Cat. of Birds in Mus. of Berlin.—Lichtenstein, Catalogue of the Birds in 
the Museum of Berlin. ' 

Licht. Ermann. Verz. von Thier. und Pflanz.— Atlas zu Ermann’s Reise wm die 
Welt. 


Licht. in Mus. Berlin.—Lichtenstein, in the Berlin Museum. 

Licht. in Mus. Berol.—Lichtenstein, in the Berlin Museum. 

Licht. Preis-Verz. Mexican. Thier. v. Deppe und Schiede—ZLichtenstein, Preis- 
Verzeichniss der Thiere und Vogel, welche von Deppe und Schiede in 
México gesammelt worden sind. 

Licht. Nordm. Erm. Reis. Atl—Atlas zu Ermann’s Reise um die Welt. 

Licht. Verz. der Doubl.—Lichtenstein, Verzeichnis der Dubletten des zoologischen 
Museums der Kénigl. Universitit zw Berlin. 

Linn. Syst. Nat.—Linneus’s Systema Nature. 

Lodd.—Loddiges. 

Lodd. in Proc. of Comm. of Sci. and Corr. of Zool. Soc.—Loddiges, in the Pro- 
ccoedings of the Committee of Science and Correspondence of the Zoolo- 
gical Society of London. 

Lodd. MSS.—Loddiges’ Manuscripts. . 

Longuem. Rev. Zool.—Longuemare, in Revue Zoologique. 

Long. et Parz. Rev. Zool.—Longuemare and Parzudaki, in Revue Zoologique, 

Martin.— VW. C. L. Martin, A General History of Humming-Birds, 

Mol. Hist. of Chilii—Molina, History of Chili, 


186 


Montes de Oca in Proc. Acad. Sci. Philad.—Montes de Oca, in the Proceedings 
of the Academy of Sciences of Philadelphia. 

Mus. Carls— Museum Carlsonianum. 

Mus. Gotzian. Dresden.— Zhe Gotzian Museum, Dresden. 

Natt. in Mus. Vindob.—Watterer, in the Vienna Museum, 

Nutt. Man. Orn.— Nuttall, Manual of Ornithology. 

Parz. Rev. Zool—Parzudaki, in Revue Zoologique. 

Parzudaki, List of the Trochilide. 

Pelzeln, Sitz. Acad. Wien.—Pelzeln, in Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichen Aka- 
demie der Wissenschaften. 

Penn. Arct. Zool.—Pennant, Arctic Zoology. 

Prince Max.—Prince Maximilian zu Wied, Beitriige zur Naturgeschichte von 
Brasilien. : 

Pr. Max. Trav.—Prince Maximilian’s Travels, 

Prinz Maximilian von Wied, Reise nach Brasilien. 

Raii.— Ray, in Willughby’s Ornithologia. 

Ramon. de la Sagra, Hist. de Cuba.—Ramon de la Sagra, History of Cuba. 

Reich. Av. Syst. Nat.—Retchenbach’s Avium Systema Nature, 

Reich. and Reichenb. Aufz. der Col.—Reichenbach, Aufzihlung der Colibris oder 
Trochilideen, &c., in Cabanis’s Journal fiir Ornithologie. 

Reichenb. in Mus. Heinean.—Reichenbach, in Heine's Musewm. 

Reichenb. Troch. Enum.—Reichenbach, Trochilinarum Enumeratio. 

Sagra, Voy. de Cub.—Ramon de la Sagra, Historia fisica, politica y natural de 
la Isla:de Cuba. 

Sallé, Liste des Oiseaux. 

Sallé, Rev. Zool.—Sallé, in Revue Zoologique. 

Salv. in Ibis.—Salvin, in The Ibis. 

Salv. in Proc. Zool. Soc.—Salvin, in the Proceedings of the Zoological Society of 
London. 

’ Salv. and Sclat. in Proc. Zool. Soc.—Salvin and Sclater, in the Proceedings of 
the Zoological Society of London. . 

Saucerotte in Mus. Heinean.—Saucerotte, in Heine's Museum. 

Sauc. or Saucer. MSS.—Saucerotte, MSS. 

Schmidt, Vogel. 

Schomb. Hist. of Barbadoes.—Sir Richard Schomburgk, History of Barbadoes, 

Sclat. Proc. Zool. Soc.—Selater, in the Proceedings of the Zoological Society of 
London. 

Sclat. and Salv. in Ibis.—Sclater and Salvin, in The Ibis. 

Shaw, Gen. Zool.—Shaw’s General Zoology. 

Shaw, Mus. Lev. or Leverianum.—Shaw, Museum Leverianum. 

Shaw, Nat. Mise.—Shaw, Naturalists’ Miscellany. 

Siebold in Mus. Monac.—Sviebold, in the Munich Museum. 

Sloane, Jam.—sSir Hans Sloane, History of Jamaica. 

Sonn. Giuvres de Buff.—Ciwures de Buffon, édition par Sonnint. 

Spalowsk. Vogel—Spalowsky, Vogel. . 

Spix, Av. Sp. Nov. Bras. 

Spix, Av. Bras. 

Steph. Cont. Shaw’s Gen, Zool.—Stephens’s Continuation of Shaw's General 
Zoology. 

Swains. in fe Phil.— Swainson, in the Annals of Philosophy. 

Swains. Birds of Brazil. Swainson, Birds of Brazil. 

Swains. Class. of Birds.— Swainson, Classification of Birds, in Lardner’s Cabinet 
Cyclopedia. 

Swains. in Phil. Mag.— Swainson, in the Philosophical Magazine. 

Swains. Syn. Birds of Mexico, in Phil. Mag.—Swatnson’s Synopsis of the Birds of 
Mexico, in the Philosophical Magazine. 

Swains. Zool. Ill—Swainson, Zoological Mllustrations. 

- Swains. Zool. Journ.— Swainson, in the Zoological Journal. 

Swains. and Rich. Faun. Bor.-Am.—Swainson and Richardson, Fauna Boreali- 
Americana, vol. ti. Birds. 

Thévet, les Singularities de la France Antarctique. 


Spix, Avium species nove in Itinere per Brasiliam. 


187 


Temm. Man. d’Orn, 2nde édit.—Zemminck’s Manuel d’ Ornithologie, second 
edition. 

Temm. in Mus. Leyden.— Temminck, in the Leyden Museum. 

Temm. Pl. Col.—Temminck, Planches Coloriées d@ Oiseaux. 

Tschudi, Consp. Av.— Tschudi, Conspectus Aviwm. 

Tschudi, Faun. Per.— Tschudi, Fauna Peruana. 

Turt. edit.— Turton’ s edition of Linneus’s Systema Nature. 

Valence. Dict. Sci. Nat.— Valenciennes, in Le Dictionnaire des Sciences Naturelles. 

Verr. MS.—Verreaux’s Manuscripts. : 

Vieill. Dict. Sci. Nat.—Vieillot, in Le Dictionnaire des Sciences Naturelles. 

Vieill. Ency. Méth. Orn.— Viedllot, Tableau Encyclopédie Méthodique, Part III. 
Ornithologie. 

Vieill. Gal. des Ois.— Viedllot, Galerie des Oiseaux. 

Vieill. Nouv. Dict. d’ Hist. Nat.—Viedllot, in Le Nouveau Dictionnaire d’ Histoire 
Naturelle. 

Vieill. Ois. de ? Am. Sept.— Viedllot, Oiseaux de ? Amérique Septentrionale. 

Vieill. Ois. chant. des Amér.— Vteillot, Histoire Naturelle des Oiseaux chanteurs 
de la zone torride. 

Vieill. Ois. dor.—Vierllot, Oiseaux dorés ou & reflets métalliques. 

Vieill et Bonn.— Bonnaterre and Vieillot, in Tableau Encyclopédie Méthodique, 
Part II. Ornithologie. 

Vig. in Zool. Journ.—Vigors, in the Zoological Journal. 

Voy. de la Vénus.— Voyage de la Vénus. 

Willughby.— Willughby, Ornithologia. 

Wils. Am. Orn.— Wilson, American Ornithology. 

Zool. of Beagle-—The Zoology of the Voyage of H.M.S. Beagle, Part III. Birds, 
by John Gould. 


GENERIC AND 


Grypus nevius. . . 
——Spixi . . 6 . 
Eutoxeres Aquila . . 
——+Condaminei . . 
Glaucis hirsuta. . . 
Mazeppa . 
affinis . ache 
f= lanceplatar, « 
—— melanura . 
SSSA) onimiie os fA 
— Ruckeri 

Hraseris 49s .4 
Threnctes leucurus 
— cervinicauda . . 
Antonie 


Phaéthornis Eurynome . 


-malaris. . 
-consobrinus . 
——fraterculus . » 
longirostris 

——— syrmatophorus . 
Boliviana . . 
—— Philippi . . . 
———hispidus 4 . °< 
=—-- Oseryi . pene 
—— anthophilus ... . 
Bourcieri. . . 
sae Guyi pe Ae 
—— Emilie. 
Yaruqui. . . 
fees superciliosus Pe 
Augusti .« » » 
—— squalidus . 


Pygmornis Longuemareus 


— —Amaura . «+ » 
—— Aspasie . + 
we ZJONULA s 6 2 


° 


ee 6©« © e @ © 


fast... 


SPECIFIC NAMES ADOPTED. 


OF 


Page 
. . 85 | Pygmornis Adolphi . . . 
35 .griseogularis . . . 
86 | ——striigularis. . . . - 
37 ot ol eee ae aera 
388 | ——nigricinctus . .. - 
38 | —— Episcopus ets 
88 | ——rufiventris, , . ‘ 
38 ivemita 4 saw oss. 
39 | —— pygmea . es + 
39 | Eupetomena macroura : 
. 89 | Sphenoproctus Pampa . . 
39 | ——curvipennis ,. 0 
40 | Campylopterus lazulus . 
40 1 === hemilencurus, ..5 
40 ensipennis, » » + + 
. 4l | ——asplendens , eee ag 
Al Villavicencio. . ... 
42, latipennis , seth cD 
42 | —— Aiquatorialis, . . . 
42 } ——obscurus . » » » » 
42, PRICES = gig ge BV bso as 
» 42 hyperythrus . » . - 
; 43 | Pheeochroa Cuvieri . . + 
43 | —— Robertl . » » « + 
43 | Aphantochroa cirrhochloris . 
i 43 | ——gularis. . » » «© « 
43 | Dolerisca fallax. . - : 
. 44 - cervina. ds Bene 
44 | Urochroa Bougueri F 
. 44 | Sternoclyta cyaneipectus. - 
45 | Eugenes fulgens abc 
. 45 | Coeligena Clemencie .. .- 
45 | Lamprolema Rhami.. . . 
< 46 | Delattria Henrici . ak 
. 46 - viridipallens . Eiecks 
‘i 47 | Heliopedica melanotis . . 
..» 47 | ——Xantusl . 2. » | 


PO a Se di a 


dmpare Pele sey a ee Microchera albocoronata. . 
tf ea ce ead pee ate Lophornis ornatus . 

Oreotrochilus Chimborazo . . . Gouldi . 

PICMNCN s f > Se maittal Se magnificus , 
SCC es te lt ee —— Regulus . 
leucopleurus . Ee oa: —— lophotes 
melanogaster. . : ‘ —— Delattrei . 
ES ire ta eng oe Ny STS Regine. 

Lampornis Mango. tee a, Helen : 
iridescens. . . . . . . 65 | Polemistria chalybea . 
PTEVOS 4 8 4 Sy soa Verreauxi . 
Venapionsige ob ay Discura longicauda : 

gramineus, « . ‘ ‘ Prymnacantha Popelairei . 

meee VITIGIS ges a kt he ; Gouldia Langsdorffi 
aurulentus . . —— Conversi . 

—virginalis . . .. 2... —— Letitiz 

—— porphyrurus. . aT Trochilus Colubris . 

Eulampis jugularis  . : Alexandri . 

——holosericeus . , > Mellisuga minima . 

—— chlorolemus, .. . Calypte Coste . 
longirostris . . . ; Annee 

Lafresnaya flavicaudata . ti Helens 
Gayl. 2 2 «4% . Selasphorus rufus 

wme SQUID 2 ce scintilla 

Doryfera Johanne. . ae ee — Floresii 

~— Ludovicie. . platycercus : 

rectirostris. . ‘ c Atthis Heloise . . . 

Chalybura Buffoni. . ‘ Stellula Calliope : 
urochrysea . Gee Calothorax cyanopogon . 

ceruleogaster Ce ae pulchra. . . . 

——PIsaure . . Acestrura Mulsanti 

Lolema frontalis . —— decorata 
Schreibersi . PAS Heliodori . 

Heliodoxa jacula . Ce a —— micrura 


° 


Jamesoni . Cheetocercus Rose . 
Leadbeatera Otero —— Jourdani . 
splendens . Myrtis Fannie . 
——prata . . a Yarrelli 
Aithurus Polytmus ‘ Thaumastura Corse 
Thalurania glaucopis tis Rhodopis vespera . 
—— Watertoni. . : Doricha Elize . 
= furcata. » . s a Evelyne . . 
—— furcatoides Ps enicura . : 
forfieata » . 9% wg Trypheena. Duponti ‘ 
——refuloens . . : : Calliphlox amethystina . 
+— Tschudi . : amethystoides 
——— nigrofasciata. . ——? Mitchelli 
—— venusta . . i Loddigesia mirabilis . 
—— Columbica ar : Spathura Underwoodi 
——+ verticeps . + . 3 melananthera 
—— Fannie . Fee cae —— Peruana 
+— Hriphyle . , +— rufocaligata . 
——? Wagleri. . A cissiura 
Panoplites Jardinei pik Lesbia Gouldi . 
- flavescens . 8 gracilis. , 
Mathewsi . ‘ —— Nuna . 
Plorisuga mellivora ‘ —— Amaryllis. 
“——= flabellifera . —— eucharis 
atras . 6 ’ Cynanthus cyanurus . 


Cynanthus ceelestis . 
‘Mocoa. . ‘ 
Cometes spargantrus . 
Rees ag’ 4 ds 
—?Glyteria. . . . 
, Gare’ a’ 
Pterophanes Temmincki . 
Agleactis ¢cupripennis 
ee" A quatonaliss sj 
Pee Da 2 arate 
caumatonota. . 


—— Castelnaudi « . .°. 


smn’ PAM. of ea 
Oxypogon Guerini. . . 
——'Lindeni’ . ¢ . 


e 


Ramphomicron heteropogon 


eer fe ey 
pam VulCAni? x ¢ 


sonmet Horrani ¢ ¢ iG 
eee ruhceps: ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ 
microrhynchus . .« 
Urosticte Benjamini . « 
Metallura cupreicauda’ « 
a——eneicauda: .-s « 
—Williami . .. . 
——Primolii . .. «% 
——— tyrianthina et 
—— Quitensis. « « . 
— smaragdinicollis, . 
Adelomyia inornata . . 
melanogenys . 


——maculata . ¢ 
_ Avocettinus eurypterus 
Avocettula recurvirostris . 
Anthocephala floriceps 
——P castaneiventris. . 
Chrysolampis moschitus . 
Orthorhynchus cristatus . 
ornatus’ @ 9 #4 
eens ORNS 2 7. 88 
Cephalepis Delalandi « 
Loddigesi : i 
Klais Guimeti . « . 


Myiabeillia typica . 
Heliactin cornuta . ; ‘ 
Heliothrix auritus; « . 
auriculatus : <¢ 
—— phainolema . 
Barrotl’ 3 ¢ 3 
= vyiolifrons : 
Schistes Geoffroyi « 
——personatus 
= albigularis . . 
Augastes scutatus. . . 
— Lumachellus . 
Petasophora serrirostris . 
ATIAIS! 4° % 

DOlGGH, 25-50 Nae ce 
w= COrUSCansS » ° e e 


@ 


e @& @ © @ © © © @& @ @& « 


A yp ee am em 


oc 2© @ © © e@ & 


oS 8 te a we Of ae & We 


@ (ee ee a! Se ae 


of -  G 6s qe « 


mm © ee «@ 


Teil 


Petasophora thalassina 


—— cyanotus . 


‘Delphine . . 
Polytmus virescens . 
‘viridissimus . . 
Patagona gigas. . 
Docimastes ensiferus . 
Kugenia Imperatrix . 
Helianthea typica . . 
‘Bonapartei . 
sits HOS eG 
oun Tutetie . + 4 


violifera’ ss 2 . 
Heliotrypha Parzudaki 
viola 


Heliangelus Olarisse « 
——strophianus + .« 
au Spencel’ 2 « . 
amethysticollis 
— Mavors « 

Diphlogeena Iris) « 
Aurora # 3 
Clytolema rubinea, 
P aurescens « 
Bourcieria torquata 
—~ fulgidigula: 
insectivora . 
— Conradi « 5 
Inca: ¢ # 
Lampropygia ceeligena 
Boliviana is « «4 
purpurea . ¢ i 
Prunellei so i 
Wilsoni » « 4 


we ee & & & & eB mR wm 


6 © @ & @ & ee & & © « 


Cr SE OH OY me ee ee we em a ee et 


Heliomaster longirostris . 


Stuarte «@ « « 
—Sclateri « « « 
pallidiceps' « « 


Constantis « 
Leocadiz . . 


° 
e 
° 
6 
6 


Lepidolarynx mesoleucus 


Calliperidia Angela . 
Oreopyra leucaspiss « 
Eustephanus galeritus 
Stokesi ete FF 
Fernandensis . 
Phecoleema rubinoides. 
Aiquatorialis . . 
Eriocnemis cupreiventris 
—— Isaacsoni : « 
—— Luciani: «§ . 
—— Mosquera; « 
—— vestitas « « 
—— nigrivestis. . 
Godimi.-.., 
° 


—— D’Orbignyi 
Derbiana . 
—_ Alinse re 
——— squamata . 


é 
6 
¢ 
e 
o 
° 
° 
® 
° 
° 


é 
e 
° 
6 
é 
é 
e 


e 
é 
é 
é 
° 
° 


es © 6 ¢ @& ¢ oe Eom ee Cae as 


ee  & @ & @ WM & SF em & oF « « & 


ey, & &@ & BO BS ee we ee & & 


ee oe Hw mm Rm Oo mm oe oe me me wm eb wm le: e @ 


+e © 8 & *) S&S Oy See a, oe. 64. et 6 


ae 
oD oo 
@ 


oe 
oe) 
Or 


Ce SS ee He i; Ss Oe On. Oe OO wm es Oy a ye 
i 
eS 


e e . ° e oe 
pt 
eal 
1 


Eriocnemis lugens « 
Atrelize 
Cyanomyia quadricolor 
violiceps 
ceyanocephala . 
— Guatemalensis 
— Francie ; 
eyanicollis . . 
Hemistilbon Ocai . °. 
Norrisi. 
Leucippus chionogaster 
Leucochloris albicollis | 
Thaumatias candidus . 
chionopectus. . 
—— leucogaster 
—— viridiceps . 
a Miering oe 
—— nitidifrons 
—— ceruleiceps 
brevirostris 
—— affinis ee 
—— chionurus . 
albiventris 
—— Linnei. 
fluviatilis . 
apicalis. . . 
maculicaudus 
Amazilia pristna . 
alticola. 
—— Dumerili . 
leucopheea , 


Pyrrhopheena cinnamomea : 


- Yucatanensis _ 
—— cerviniventris 
—— castaneiventris 
—— Riefferi 
—-— beryllina ’, 
—— Devillei . . 
—— viridigaster . 
—— iodura. 

eyanura P 
Erythronota antiqua . 
—— Felicie. 

—— Edwardi . 

- niveiventris ’. 
——— elegans , 
Saucerottia typica . 

POphie, 4 9 4 
Warszewicz1 . 
Hemithylaca cyanifrons . 

Eupherusa eximia , 
Chrysuronia (Enone . 
Josephine “., + + 


Chrysuronia Neera . 
ceruleicapilla 

—— Humboldti 

—— Elicie . 

——chrysura . . 

Eucephala Grayi 
smaragdo-cerulea 

— chlorocephala 

—— ceruleo-lavata . 
scapulata . 

—— hypocyanea 
cerulea 


——— cyanogenys 
Panterpe insignis~> . 
Juliamyia typica 
Feliciana . 
Circe latirostris . 
—— Doubledayi 
Pheoptila sordida . 


zonura . ; 
Damophila amabilis 
Hylocharis sapphirina 
lactea . + es 
—— cyanea. . 
Sapphironia Goudoti . 
ceruleigularis . 
Sporadinus elegans. 
——Ricordi ... 
——~ ? Maugei . 
Chlorolampis auriceps 
Caniveti 
Osberti 
—-— Salvini. 
Chlorostilbon angustipennis 
—— Heeberlini 
—— Phaéthon . 
aureiventris 
—-— prasinus 
igneus . 
—— Atala 
—— Daphne 
Peruanus . 
—— Napensis . 
brevicaudatus 
—— chrysogaster . 
assimilis 
nitens . . 
Panychlora Alicise 
euchlors .  < s 
stenura . 4 6 
—— Poortmanni . . 
Smaragdochrysis iridescens . 
Phlogophilus hemileucurus . 


* 
— — 


INDEX OF GENERIC NAMES ADOPTED, 


Acestrura . 
Adelomyia . 
Agleactis 
Aithurus 
Ainazihia — 3° % 
Anthocephala . 
Aphantochroa . 


PACED S es 
Augastes .. 
Avocettinus 


Avocettula . 
Bourcieria . . 
Calliperidia 
Calliphlox . . 
Calothorax . 
Calypte . 
Campylopterus 
Cephalepis . 
Cheetocercus 
Chalybura . 
Chlorolampis . 
Chlorostilbon . 
Chrysolampis . 
Chrysuronia 
AAEGE ae? 
Clytolema . 
Celigena . 
Cometes 
Cyanomyia 
Cynanthus . 
Damophila . 
Delattria 
Diphlogena 


DIScUia sky 


Docimastes 
Dolerisca ~ 
Doricha . 
Doryfera ee 
Eriocnemis 
Erythronota 
Eucephala i 


Eugenes 
Eugenia. 
Eulampis 
Eupetomena 
Eupherusa . 


Eustephanus . 


Eutoxeres . 
Florisuga 

Glaucis . 

Gouldia . 

Grypus. . 
Heliactin 

Heliangelus 
Helianthea . 
Heliodoxa . 
Heliomaster 
Heliopeedica 
Heliothrix . 
Heliotrypha 
Hemistilbon 


Hemithylaca 


Hylocharis . 
Tolema . 
Juliamyia . 


Klais . 


Lafresnaya . E 


Lampornis . 


Lamprolema : 
Lampropygia . 


Leadbeatera 


Lepidolarynx . 


Lesbia 
Leucippus . 
Leucochloris 
Loddigesia . 
Lophornis . 
Mellisuga 
Metallura 
Microchera 
Myiabeillia . 
Myrtis . . 


Page 
57 


. 129 

67 
5 EY) 
. 163 
. 141 


Oreopyra 
Oreotrochilus . 
Orthorhynchus 
Oxypogon . 
Panoplites . 
Panterpe . 
Panychlora. . . 
Patagona 
Petasophora 
Pheochroa . 
Pheeoleema . 
Pheoptila . 
Phaéthornis 
Phlogophilus . 
Polemistria . 
Polytmus 
Prymnacantha 
Pterophanes 
Py OWIONUS < v= 5 
Pyrrhopheena . 
Ramphomicron 
Rhodopis 
Sapphironia 
Saucerottia . 
Schistes . 
Selasphorus 
Smaragdochrysis . 
Spathura 
Sphenoproctus 
Sporadinus 
Stellula . 
Sternoclyta 
Thalurania . 
Thaumastura . 
Thaumatias 
Threnetes . . 
Topaza . 
Trochilus 
Tryphena . 
Urochroa 
Urosticte 


aE 


INDEX 


OF 
SPECIFIC NAMES 


OF 


HUMMING-BIRDS, 


[The following is an alphabetical arrangement of all the specific names with 


which I am: acquainted ; those appearing in my own work, (and to which — 


the numbers refer,) and others which I have not been able to determine to 
what species they have been applied. Some of the latter have been assigned 
to manufactured specimens, and the descriptions of the others are frequently 
so curt and vague that they cannot be identified. | 


PAGE 
Aboillet - « « « « Moyiaboillia type. 2 5 te ee OHO 
abnormis, Natt.. . . Not identified. 
acuticaudus . . « . Panychlorastenura . . = «= ». s « 180 
Addex « « « « « « Spathura rufocaligata. .. .« » © + 100 
.° i Sea | Oveotrochilus Adela. . . . . . . 64 
Adolphi . « « & .ygmomis Adelphi. . . ee « « 
eeneicauda on 
geneicaudus . . . Metallura geneicauda { « « « * « » tb 
eeneocauda . . 


ABquatorialis . . . Agleactis Alquatorialis . ewe » 106 
a 1 ee he he 6. Campylopterus Aiquatorialis . . . 54 
eee so + Ue fh ROkemaeomatomals<,.. .. . ees 
affnis. . . . . . Thaumatias affinis oT ee pean 
BR sg sg i eo GCS ais te + uB8 


es va ta >. oJ HAChOMaIS Bupeteiogus. 4.9... ode d® 
Agia... >. . . Pymthopheuadodura 7 4. . Be EbO 
sibicollis « .« «+ « Ledcochlorivalbicolis . .. . . = . bl 
albigularis . . . . Leucochlorisalbicollis . . . .-. . 151 
Se Se hoa. OR CHISteRIRIRIO ES. ee See Aes 
albirostris. . « « « (haumatiasleucogaster. . . . . . 152 


albiventris . . . . Thaumatias albiventris . a , 1583 
albocoronata. . . . Microcheraalbocoronata. . . . 82 
aibUs-<>< « « * = eamoporitia Mongo.) . ee . 64 
Alevandyi- . « + « Trochilusflemmdri. . 2... ie BY 
Bae Ro Ps ea 4 a 

Be ws } Panyenlora Acie, . . . 6s no LP 


Alina . 
Aline . 
Aline . 
Allardi 
alticola 
amabilis . 
Amaryllis 
amaura . 
amazicula 
Amazili . 
Amazilia . 
amazilicula . 


amethysticollis . 


amethystina . 
amethystinus’ 
a ae 
Anais . 
Angela .. 
Angele 
angustipennis 
Anna . 
Anne. . 
anthophila 
anthophilus . 
antiqua 
Antonie . 
apicalis 


Aquila 
Arsennii . 
Arsinoé 
arsinoides . 
Aspasi . 
assimilis . 


Atala . 


Atale . 

ater 

atra 

atratus 
atricapillug . 
atrigaster . 
atrimentalis . 
Audebertii 
Audenetii . 
Augusta . 
Auguste . 
Augusti 


aurantias, Gel. 


aurata . 
auratus 


196 


Eriocnemis Aline . 


. Metallura tyrianthina. 
- Amazilia alticola 

- Damophila amabilis . 
- Lesbia Amaryllis 

. Pygmornis amaura 

- Amazilia Dumerili. 

- Amazilia pristina . 

. Pyrrhophena Riefferi 
. Amazilia pristina . 

- Amazilia Dumerili 

- Heliangelus amethysticollis 


\ Calliphlox amethystina . 


- Calliphlox amethystoides 
- Petasophora Anais. 

- Petasophora cyanotis . 

- Petasophora iolata . 

- Petasophora thalassina 


\ Calliperidia Angele . 


- Chlorostilbon angustipennis 
\ Calypte Anne . 


\ Phaéthornis anthophilus  . 


- Erythronota antiqua . 


- Threnetes Antoniz 

- Phaéthornis Guyi . 
- Thaumatias apicalis 
- Eutoxeres Aquila . 


Heliopsedica melanotis 


. Pyrrhopheena beryllina . 

. Pyrrhophzena Riefferi 

. Pygmornis Aspasie 

- Chlorostilbon assimilis 

. Chlorostilbon Atala 

. Chlorostilbon chrysogaster . 
. Chlorostilbon Atala 


Florisuga atra . 


- Lampornis Mango. 

. Eulampis holosericeus 
. Pygmornis Amaura 

.. Eucephala cerulea . 

. Polemistria chalybea . 


Phaéthornis Augusti . 


. Not determined. 
. Panychlora Alicie . 
. Eulampis jugularis 


ww ww eS Aare eophorisornatus:: . 
aureiventris . . . . Chlorostilbon aureiventris . 
Aurelian . . . «~ . Eriocnemis Aurelix 
aureoviridis . . Lampornis viridis. 
aurescens .” . Clytolema? aurescens 
aureus, Licht, + Clytolema rubinea?, 


197 


auriceps ...... «. . Chlorolampis auriceps 


auriculata 
auriculatus . 
aurigaster 
aurita . 
auritus . 


Aurora . 


aurulenfa. . . 


aurulentus 
Avocetta .. . 
Azaree, Vieill. 
azureus 
Bahamensis . 
Bancrofti . 
Barroti. . 


Benjamini 
Benjaminus . 
beryllina . 
beryllinus . 
bicolor. . 


os 
° 


Rifaroata . Ee 


bilobus 
bilopha . .- 
bilophus . 5 
bipartitus, Lach. 
Boliviana. 


bombilus . 
Bonapartei . 
Boothi. + « 
Bougueri. . 
Bourcieri . 
brachyrhynchus 
‘Brasilianus . 
Brasiliensis . 


————— 
° 


é € * 
brevicaudatus 
brevicaudus . 
brevirostris . 
bromicolor « 
Buffoni - 
cerulea 
ceruleicapilla 
ceeruleiceps « 
cexruleigaster . 
ceruleigularis 
cxruleiventris 
ceruleogaster 
ceruleogularis 
cxeruleo-lavata 
csrulescens « 
eeruleus . . 
caligatus . 
Calliope * »* 


« 


o 


° 


e 


. 


eg } Htiothix auriculatus 


Eulampis holosericeus 
. Helianthea Bonapartei 


. Heliothrix auritus . 


.. Heliothrix auriculatus 
. Eulampis jugularis 
. Heliothrix auritus . 
. Diphlogena Aurora . 


Lampornis aurulentus 


. Avocettula recurvirostris . 

. Not determined. 

. Hylocharis cyaneus 

. Doricha Evelyne . 

. Eulampis jugularis 

. Heliothrix Barroti . 
Heliothrix violifrons . 


sie | Urostiete Betjamini . ee 


} Pyrrhophena beryllina . 


. Hylocharis cyaneus 
. Thalurania? Wagleri . 


bo Wheelie mchanis wise. 6.70 sete 


Heliactin cornuta , . pe x 


. Cynanthus cyanurus?, 

. Lampropygia Boliviana. . 

. Phaéthornis Boliviana 

. Acestrura Heliodori . . . 
. Helianthea Bonapartei 

. Calypte Helenx 

. Urochroa Bougueri 

. Phaéthornis Bourcieri . . . 
. Ramphomicron microrhynchus 
. Glaucis hirsuta . ee. 

. Pygmornis Eremita ... . 

. Phaéthornis squalidus  . 

. Phaéthornis superciliosus. . 

- Glaucis hirsuta. teen 
. Chlorostilbon brevicaudatus. 

. Calliphlox amethystina . 

. Thaumatias brevirostris : 
Lampornis porphyrurus , 
Chalybura Buffoni. . 

. Eucephala cerulea . . . 

. Chrysuronia cxruleicapilla . 

. Thaumatias ceruleiceps . . 

. Chalybura ceruleogaster. . . 
Sapphironia ceruleigularis . 


e 


Chalybura czeruleogaster . 


. Sapphironia ceruleigularis . 
. Eucephala ceruleo-lavata . . 
. Sapphironia ceruleigularis . 

. Eucephala cerulea. . . ‘ 
. Saucerottia Sophie ... . 


a 
9 


« Stellula Calliope . 2 4 3 


ee » 


198 


campestris. . ... . Calliphlox amethystina . 
campyloptera . . . Sphenoproctus Pampa 
campylopterus . . . Campylopterus latipennis 
campylostylus . . . Aphantochroa cirrhochloris . 
candida ; 
candidus . : 
Canivetieno 4; Chlorolampis Caniveti . , 
Capensis, Gmel. . . Not determined. 
carbunculus. . . . Chrysolampis moschitus . 
Caroli . 
Carolus 
Cassini . . . . . Trochilus Alexandri A 
castaneiventris .. . . Anthocephala? castaneiventris . 
- . . « « « Phyrrhophezna castanciventris . 
castaneocauda. . .. .. Heliopedica Xantusi . i 
castaneoventris . . . Anthocephala? castaneiventris , 
Castelnaudi . A 
Castelnaui . . . |} Agleactis Castelnaudi. , 
Castelneaui . ; 
Catharine . . . . Mellisuga minima . 
caudacutus, Vieill, . Not determined. 
caumatonota . 
caumatonotus 
Cecilie. . . .. . 1 Oreotrochilus Estelle . 
cephalatra. . . . . Aithurus polytmus. 
cephalus . .. .. .. .. Phaéthornis longirostris . 
cervina . . . . . Dolerisca cervina 
cervinicauda. .. . . Threnetes cervinicauda 
cerviniventris . . . Pyrrhophezna cerviniventris 
chalcotis . . . . . Petasophora serrirostris , 
chalybea . 
chalybeus . : 
Chimborazo . . . . Oreotrochilus Chimborazo 
chionogaster. . . . Leucippus chionogaster , 
chionopectus. . . . Thaumatias chionopectus 
chionura . 
chionurus 
chlorocephala 
chlorocephalus . 
chlorolaema . ‘ 
chlorolemus, . .  Eulampis chlorolamus 
chlorolaimus. 
chloroleucurus . , | Polytmus virescens . . . . . 
chlorolophus. . , , Orthorhynchusexilis. . . ... ., 
Urolampra chloropogon, Cab. e¢ Hein. 
Not seen. 
chrysobronchus. . . Polytmus virescens 
chrysochloris . . . Cometes sparganurus . : 
chrysogaster. . . . Chlorostilbon chrysogaster , 
Cee Wee er mee . Chlorostilbon Haeberlini 
— . . . « . « Helianthea Bonapartei A 
chrysogastra. . . . Chlorostilbon chrysogaster . 
chrysolopha. . . . Heliactin cornuta . 
chrysura . 
chrysurus . j 
mtg oe ete se 6 Gtypus Spixi 
mms ee ve ee 6. Cometes sparganurus . 
wwe 6s he 6+ 6g 6 €6Polytmus viridissimus 
ciliatus, Lath. MS.. , Not determined. 
cinereicollis, Vieil/.. . Not determined. 
cinereus . . . . » Campylopterus latipennis . . ,. . 


ee 
Thaumatias candidus . 


} Cometes? Caroli 


Agleactis caumatonota 


Polemistria chalybea . 


} Thaumatias chionurus , 


} Eucephala chlorocephala . 


ehloropogon . 


Chrysuronia chrysura . 


Circe . Moor 
cirrhochloris.- . 
cirrochloris . 
cissiura , 
Glarissa 4 .- 
Clarissa . .- 
Clarisse 
Clemencize 
Cleopatra! 
ccelestis 


celigena . 
coelina . ; 
coeruleiventris . 
collaris 
eolubris , 
Colombica 
Columbiana . 
Columbicus . 
concinna, Steph. 
Condaminei . 
Condamini . 
Conradi . 
consobrinus . 
Constantii . « 
Conversii. . .« 
conurus, Steph... 
te gs ob 
Come 2 5, 
corallirostris. . 
Corinna, Less. . 
cornuta 
cornutus . » 
coruscans . , 
coruscus . . » 


Coste . 
Qrispa. 2 « + 
crispus. 
cristata ay 
cristatellus . . 
cristatus . : 
erypturus. . . 
cuculliger . 
cupreicauda . . 


cupreicaudus . | 


cupreiventris . 
cupreocauda . 


einnamomea, . . 


ee er ae ee Se 


cupreoventris . . 


cupricauda . 
cupripennis . 
cupriventris . 
curvipennis . . 
Cuvieri 

cyanea . 
eyaneipectus. . 
cyanipectus . 
eyanopectus. . 
~oyaneus « » % 


199 


Eustephanus Fernandensis . 
. Pyrrhophena cinnamomea . 
. Circe latirostris . 


Aphantochroa cirrhochloris . 


Spathura cissiura . . 
Heliangelus Clarisse . 


Coeligena Clemencie . 


. Thaumatias leucogaster . 
. Cynanthus ceelestis . 

. Tryphena Duponti . , 
. Lampropygia coeligena 

. Sapphironia ceruleigularis , 
. Chalybura ceeruleogaster . 
. Selasphorus rufus . . . 
- Trochilus colubris . 


Thalurania Columbica 


. Mellisugus, “ Zinn.” Reichenbach. 


Hutoxeres Condaminei 


. Bourcieria Conradi , 

. Phaéthornis consobrinus 
. Heliomaster Constanti . 
. Gouldia Conversi. «. .« 
. Not determined. 


Thaumastura Core 


ee @ & 


. Pyrrhophena cinnamomea , 


Heliomaster longirostris, 


} Heliactin cornuta . 


. Petasophora coruscans 
. Ramphomicron heteropogon 
. Calothorax cyanopogon . 


Calypte Coste . . . . 
Petasophora serrirostris . 


Orthorhynchus cristatus 
Orthorhynchus exilis . 
Orthorhynchus cristatus. 


. Panychlora Alicia 


- Heliopzdica melanotis 


° 


Metallura cupreicauda 


. Eriocnemis cupreiventris 


e 


Metallura cupreicauda 


. Eriocnemis cupreiventrigs 


Metallura cupreicauda , 


. Agleactis eupripennis 


e 


Eriocnemis cupreiventris 


° 


” 


Sphenoproctus curvipennis ; 


Pheochroa Cuvieri 


Hylocharis cyanea . . . 


Sternoclyta cyaneipectus 
Eulampis jugularis , : 


° 


ES 


cyaneus ... . 


cyanicollis 
cyanifrons 
cyanocephala- 


: Gimel, : 


cyanocotlis 
cyanogenys . 
cyanomelas . 


cyanopectus . 
cyanopogon . 
cyanopterus . 
cyanopygos . 
cyanotis 
cyanotus . 
cyanura 
cyanurus . 

, Gmel. . 


cyanus, Vieill. 


Daphne . . 
dasypus 
Dayidianus .; 
decorata . 
decoratus . 
decorus 

De Filippi 
Delalandi 
Delattre . 
Delattrei « 


Delphina . 
Delphinz 
Derbianus 
Derbyanus 
Derbyi_ é 
Devillei 


dichrous, Licht. 


dilophus . 
CS AY ese > 
Dohrni 
Dominica 
Dominicensis 
Dominicus . 


D’Orbignyi . 
Doubledayi . 


ecm 
s 


Dubusi 
Duchassaigni 
Dumerili. . 
Duponti . . 
Edwardi . 
elatus . 
elegans 


ae » ° 


200 


. Hylocharis cyanea 

. Cyanomyia cyanicollis 

. Hemithylaca cyanifrons . 

. Cyanomyia cyanocephala 

. Cyanomyia Guatemalensis . 
. Cyanomyia quadricolor . 

. Not determined. 

. Cyanomyia cyanicollis 

. Eucephala cyanogenys 

. Eulampis jugularis 

. Sapphironia ceruleigularis . 
. Sternoclyta cyaneipectus 

. Calothorax cyanopogon . 

. Pterophanes Temmincki 

. Eriocnemis cupreiventris, Reichenb. 


Petasophora cyanotis 


, Pyrrhophexna cyanura 
. Cynanthus cyanurus . 
. Not determined. 

. Not determined. 

. Chlorostilbon Daphne 
. Eriocnemis Aline . 

. Pygmornis rufiventris 


Acestrura decorata 


- Lophornis magnificus 
. Phaéthornis Philippi . 


. Cephalepis Delalandi . 


Campylopterus dene thapntoni : 


. Lophornis Delattrei 


\ Petasophora Delphinz 


. Docimastes ensiferus . 

. Eriocnemis Derbiana . 

. Docimastes ensiferus . 

. Eriocnemis Derbianus , 
. Eriocnemis Derbiana . 

. Pyrrhophxna Devillei 

. Chrysuronia chrysura, Reichend. 
. Heliactin cornuta. . . 
. Heliotrypha Parzudaki . 
. Glaucis Dohrni . 

. Lampornis gramineus 

. Mellisuga minima . 

. Lampornis aurulentus 

. Glaucis hirsuta . 

. Lampornis gramineus 

. Eriocnemis D’Orbignyi . 
. Circe Doubledayi . 

. Circe latirostris. 

. Pyrrhophena Riefferi 

. Sapphironia ceruleogularis . 
. Amazilia Dumerili 


Pyrrhopheena Devillei 
Tryphena Duponti 


. Erythronota Edwardi 
. Chrysolampis moschitus . 


. Sporadinus elegans 


: | Erythronota elegans . 


flicia . 
Elicic . 
Elisa”. 
Elize . 
Emile... 
Emilie . 
enicura . 
enicurus . . 
ensifera . « 
ensiferus . « 
ensipennis 
Hos. . : 
Episcopus . 
Eremita . . 
Eriphyle . . 
Eryphila. . 
Eryphile. . 
erythronota . 
erythronotos 
erythronotus 


erythrorhyncha, Bp. 


Esmeralda. 
Estella 
Wstelle. . . 
euanthes . . 
eucharis . 
euchloris .. - 
Eurynome 
Eurynomus .- 
euryptera 
eurypterus . 
Eveline . 
Evellina . 
Evelyne . 
excisus 
exes. Ss 
eximia . 
eximius 
exortis 
faleata . 
falcatus 
fallax . 
Fannie .. 
Fannyi « « 
Fanny. 
fasciatus . 

, Shaw . 
Faustine . 
Felicia. 
Feliciz 
Feliciana . 
Fernandensis 
ferrugineus . 
festivus 
filicaudus . 
fimbriata . 
fimbriatus 
fiabellifera 


fiabelliferus . 
flammifrons . 


flavescens-. 


201 


} Chrysuronia Elicia 


} Domeha Whee 


. Erythronota Felicia . 
. Phaéthornis Emiliz 


yeas enicurs “= « 


Docimastes ensiferus . 


. Campylopterus ensipennis 


. Helianthea Eos . 
. Pygmornis Episcopus. . 
. Pygmornis Hremita . 


Thalurania Eriphyle . . 


Erythronota antiqua wise 


Not a species. 
. Panychlora Poortmanni . 


Oreotrochilus Estelle . 


° 


. Ramphomicron microrhynchus. 


. Lesbia eucharis. . . « 


Panychlora euchloris . -. ° 


} Phaéthornis Eurynome . 


} Avocettinus eurypterus 


Doricha Evelyne . . . - 


. Thalurania Eriphyle . 
. Orthorhynchus exilis . 


Eupherusa eximia . : 
. Heliotrypha Parzudaki . 
| Campylopterus lazulus - . 
Dolerisca fallax . 
\a Thalurania Fanniz 


. Myrtis Fannie . . 
. Lampornis Mango . 
. Not determined. 


. Cyanomyia cyanocephala. - 


\ Erythronota Felicis . 
. duliamyia Feliciana . 


° 


. Eustephanus Fernandensis . 


. Glaucis hirsuta . é 
. Polemistria chalybea . 
Acestrura Mulsanti 


} Florisuga mellivora . 
Florisuga flabellifera . 


. Eustephanus galeritus 
. Panoplites flavescens . 


waive 


of © @ 


*. © © 


202 
flavicaudata . 
flavicaudatus 
flavifrons. . . . . Chlorostilbon Phaéthon . 
——, Gmel.. . . « Not determined. 
Floresii, . .. .. . . Lampornis porphyrurus . 
» « « » «© «» Selasphorus Floresii . 
floriceps . . . . . Anthocephala floriceps 
fluviatilis. . . . .° Thaumatias fluviatilis , 
forcipatus . - Eupetomena macroura 
forficata . . .” . . Thalurania forficata . 
forficatus.. . . . . Hustephanus galeritus 
— * « « « « « Cynanthus cyanurus . 
Francie .. . . . Cyanomyia Francix . 
Hraseri. Glaucis Fraseri . ee 
fraterculus . . . . Phaéthornis fraterculus 
frontalis .. .. .. . « Tolema frontalis 
—— ... . . . Thalurania glaucopis . 
fulgens . . . . . Eugenes fulgens 
fulgidigula Bourcieria fulgidigula 
fulgidus . . . . . Lamprolema Rhami . 
fulvifrons. . . . . Hylocharis sapphirina 
fulviventris .. . . . Dolerisca fallax. . 
fulvus, Gmel. . . . Not determined. 
furcata’ . . . . . Thalurania furcata . 


= } Lafresnaya flavicaudata . 


furcatoides . . . Thalurania furcatoides . 
furcatus . . . . . Thaluraniafurcata. , . 
2 © & 4 - Thalurania Tschudii . . 
furcifer, Shaw . . . Not determined. 
MnO Se i. 2. se ep 
fuscicaudatus . . . Pyrrhophana Riefferi 
fuscis. . . . . . Florisugaatra . . , 
Gabriel . . . . . Heliothrix Barroti. 
Galatheaa. . . - Chlorostilbon prasinus 
galerita 
galeritus . ‘ ? 
Gayhs ee . + Lafresnaya Gayi 
Geoffroyi. . . . . Schistes personatus 
. Schistes Geoffroyi . 


Eustephanus galeritus 


Georgina . 
Georgine . : 
Gibsoni, Fras. . . . A manufactured specimen. 
gigantea . . 
PIBIS ee 6 
glaucopis. . . . . Thalurania glaucopis. , 
glaucopoides, D’ Orb. : 

et Lafres. ee 
glomata . . . . . Hriocnemis vestita. , 
Glyceria . ‘ Cometes? Glyceria 
ALONE Sits . Eriocnemis Godini 
Gorgo. . . Cynanthus cyanurus . 
Goudoti . . Sapphironia Goudoti . 
Gouldi . Lesbia Gouldi . . 
— ise. - .« Lophornis Gouldi . 


Avocettinus eurypterus 


} Patagona or got 


Not determined. 


: . Petasophora serrirostris , 
gracilis . Lesbia gracilis . 
graminea . 

gramineus . f 
Granadensis. . . Pheolaxma rubinoides. 
granatinus | . . . Eulampisjugularis . 
grata . 4 .  « «+ Leadbeatera grata . 

Grayis « « - « HucephalaGrayi . . 


Lampornis gramineus 


- griseigularis . 
iseogularis . 
uatemalensis . 

Guerini 

Guimeti . 

Gujanensis . 

gularis 


gutturalis . 
Guy . 
Guyi . 
Gyrinno . . 
Eiichorlinii : 
ol mma Bp. é 
Helena 
Helense 


Helianthea . 
Heliodori 
helios . 
Heloisa 
Heloise °. 
hemileucurus 


Henrica . . 
Henrici 
Herrani . 
heteropogon. « « « 
heteropygia . 
HieSttdh. 44% 
hirsutus 
hirundinacea 
hirundinaceus . . 
hispida 

hispidus . . 
Hoffmanni . . 
holosericea . . « 
holosericeus . 
Biimboldtr ya « 
humilis . 
hyperythrus . 
hypocyanea . 
hypoleucus . 


hypopheus 


203 


oa Pygmornis griseogularis . 


Cyanomyia Guatemalensis . 


» Oxypogon Guerini 

. Klais Guimeti . : 
. Chrysolampis moschitus . 
. Aphantochroa gularis 

. Lampornis gramineus 

- Lampornis Mango ?. 


} Phaéthornis Guyi . 


. Thalurania furcata . 
3 Chlorostilbon Hasberlini 


Not @ species. 


- Lophornis Helens . 

» Calypte Helene . . . . 
- Lophornis Helene «4 « « 
- Helianthea typica. . 

- Acestrura Heliodori . 

- Lophornis magnificus 


} atthis MbClOIss «ps ks 


« Campylopterus hemileucurus . 
. Phlogophilus hemileucurus . 


Delattria Henrici . 


- Ramphomicron Herrani 


Ramphomicron heteropogon 


- Doricha enicura . .. -« 


Glaucis hirsuta. . . . . 


- Eupetomena macroura ‘. 
- Gouldia Langsdorfi . . . 


Phaéthornis hispidus . 


- Saucerottia Sophie . . 


Eulampis holosericeus < . 


» Chrysuronia Humboldti . 

+ Mellisuga minima. . 

- Campylopterus hyperythrus 
- Eucephala hypocyanea 

- Leucippus chionogaster . 

. Cyanomyia Francie . . . 
- Chrysolampis moschitus . 


icterocephalus . Calypte Amne . . . . 

Idalize . . Pygmornis Idalie. . ; 

igneus . — . Chlorostilbon igneus . 

Imperatrix . Eugenia Imperatrix . 

Inca Bourcieria Inca. 

i ta . 

Sekine ees = Adelomyia inornata 

insectivora -. B 

insectiyorus . ourcieria insectivora 

ets . Panterpe insignis . 

intermedia 

i iniagdiid. . Fe Phaéthornis squalidus 

iodura . 

tata } Pyrrhophena iodura . 
 jolata . : 

lus... } Petasophora iolata. . . 


iridescens 


Tris. 
Isaacsoni . 
Tsaure. 
jacula . 
Jamesoni . 


janthinotus 
Jardinei . 
Jardini . 
Johanne . 
jolata .. . 
Josephine 
Jourdani . 
jugularis . 
Julia... . 
Julie . 
Julie 
Kienerii . 
Kingii . 


Tabrador : ; 
lactea . 


ce Oe eae et a eS 


oe ee & ® & + © & «+ 


Letitia 

Leetitie . 
Lafresnayi ; 
lop Merabh be Pes 
lamprocephalus . 


Tamprus:-.° . <« 
lanceolatus 
Langsdorffi . 
largipennis . 
lasiopygus .... 
latipennis . 


latirostris 
lazula . 
lazulinus . 
lazulus 


Leadbeateri . 
Leocadiz . 
lepida . 
lepidus . . 
Lereboulleti . 
Lessoni 


—_—_——, 


leucaspis’ . 


leucocrotaphus . 


leucogaster 


° 


204 


. Lampornis iridescens . 
. Smaragdochrysis iridescens . 


. Diphlogena Iris 


. Eriocnemis Isaacsoni . 


. Chalybura ? Isaurse 


. Heliodoxa jacula 

. Heliodoxa Jamesoni . 
. Oreotrochilus Pichincha 
. Petasophora serrirostris 


} Panoplites Jardinei . 


. Doryfera Johanne . 
. Petasophora iolata . 
. Chrysuronia Josephinz 


Cheetocerus Jourdani . 


.. Kulampis jugularis 


Juliamyia typica . . 


. Spathura Underwoodi 
. Cynanthus cyanurus . 
.’ Eustephanus galeritus 
. Myrtis Fanny ... 
. Hylocharis lactea . 
. Thaumatias Linneei 


Gouldia Leetitise 


. Lafresnaya flavicaudata . 
. Cephalepis Delalandi . 

. Calypte Anne . 
lamprogeneias, Bonap. Lampornis Prevosti, Reichenb. 
. Chlorostilbon prasinus 

. Glaucis lanceolatus 

. Gouldia Langsdorffi . 

. Campylopterus latipennis 
» Heliotrypha Parzudaki . 
. Campylopterus latipennis 
. Campylopterus ensipennis . 
. Amazilia pristina . 

. Hylocharis sapphirina 

. Circe latirostris . 

. Circe Doubledayi . 

. Circe latirostris . 

. Hylocharis lactea . 

. Campylopterus lazulus 

. Circe Doubledayi . 

. Circe latirostris 

. Lampornis Mango. 

. Leadbeatera grata . 

. Heliomaster Leocadize 


Tryphena Duponti . 


. Circe Doubledayi . 
. Avocettula recurvirostris . 


. Cyanomyia cyanocephala 


. Circe latirostris . 
. Oreopyra leucaspis 


. Heliopzdica melanotis 
. Heliothrix auritus . 


. Leucippus chionogaster. . 
. Thaumatias leucogaster . 


205 


PAGE 
leucogastra . . . . Thaumatiasleucogaster . . . .. . 152 | 
leucophwa . . . . Amazilialeucophea . ... .. . 156 t 
leucophrys . . . . Phaéthornissqualidus ..... . 45 ) 
leucopleurus. . . .: Oreotrochilus leucopleurus. . . . . 63 i 
leucopterus . . . . Oreotrochilusleucopleurus. . . . . 64 
leucopygins.... , ~. Hletehbentis . ee vr SL q 
leucotis . . . . « Heliopwdica melanotis . .... . 60 i 
Igitis.. ...... ,.\.Bhponptesdeusmmae ), -. .. .. . sao AD \ 

( Libussa . Heliangelus Clarisse . . «0. . 1 182 i 
Lichtensteinii . Panoplites flavescens . ber BO \ 
ll sani , Discura longicauda 85 
| Lindeni . Oxypogon Lindeni 108 
Linnei . Thaumatias Linnzi 153 4 
Loddigesii . Cephalepis Loddigesi . 118 4 
longicauda Di . 85 iq 
longicaudus . iscura longicauda . . } 
longirostris . . Eulampis longirostris . 69 4 
5s eas . Heliomaster longirostris . 138 i 
— - Heliomaster Stuarte . 138 i 
— . Heliomaster mesoleucus . . 140 i 
ce . Phaéthornis longirostris . 42 i 
Longuemarei if 
Longuemareus . Pygmornis Longuemareus . 46 4 
Longuemari . 7 
lophotes . . Lophornis lophotes . 83 a. 
Luciani . Eriocnemis Luciani . 144 ii 
ae Heliopadica melanotis 61 ‘ | 
; . Coeligena Clemencia . 59 Ny 
Lucifer . Calothorax cyanopogon . 90 | 
Ludovicise . Doryfera Ludovicize ee 
lugens . Eriocnemis lugens . 146 
lugubris . . Florisuga atra 81 
Lumachella , ' 
Tigachellis Augastes Lumachellus . 123 14 
Lutetiz . Helianthea Lutetie . 131 | 
Lydia . « Thalurania verticeps . 78 Ve 
macroura . 4 
macrourus Eupetomena macroura . . 50 q 
macrura . t 
maculata . . Adelomyia maculata . 113 | 
Rain icp . Thaumatias Linnei 154 i, 
maculatum . . Grypus nevius . ' 35 | 
maculatus . Lampornis gramineus . 65 
ap, . Thaumatias Linnsi 153 
maculicaudus . Thaumatias maculicaudus » 154 
maculicollis . . Panychlora Alicie . . 179 | 
Mies Lophornis magnificus . 83 ‘i 
malaris . Phaéthornis malaris 41 a i 
Malvina. . '. Not seen. a 
Mango .. .- Lampornis Mango . 64 
reas .- Lampornis porphyrurus . 67 
maniculata . . Hriocnemis cupreiventris . 144 ‘ 
maniculatum . Grypus nevius . 35 
margaritaceus .... . Lampornis aurulentus ogres a6 
Le ee } Pymthophena eam IBS 
bigate - A RUEHS PONS OR 4 
marmoratus.......-Lampornisgramineus.......... . 66 
Pp ; 
q 


Matthewsi, 
Maugei 
Maugzus . 
Maugeana 
Maugeanus 
Maugei 
Mavors 
masxillosus 
maximus, Vell. 
Maynensis 
Mazeppa . 
melananthera 
ae, 


me! lanogenys 


melanolophus, Vieill. . 


melanorhynchus 
melanotis . 
melanotis. 
melanotus 
me'!anura . 
mellisugus 


mellivora 
mellivorus 
Meriphile 
Merrittii . 
mesoleuca 
mesoleucus 
metallicus 
Mexicanus 
microrhyncha 
microrhynchum 
microrhynchus . 
micrura 
micrurus . 
Milleri 
minima 
minimus. . 
minullus, Vieill. 
mirabilis . 
Mitchelli . 
Mocoa. 
modestus * 
montana . 
montanus 
Moorei 
moschita . 
moschitus 
Mosquera 
mosquitus 
Mossai 
Mulsanti . 


multicolor, Gmel, 


mystacinus 
mystax 
nevia . 
neevlus 
Napensis . 
Nattereri . 


206 


. Panoplites Mathewsi . 


\ Sporadinus ? Maugzei . 
J 


3 
Sporadinus ? Maugzi. 


. Thaumatias Linneei 
. Heliangelus Mavors 
. Phaéthornis malaris ? 
. Not determined. 
. Leadbeatera Otero, Reichend. 
. Glaucis Mazeppa 5 
. Spathura melananthera . 
. Oreotrochilus ee : 
. Eugenes fulgens . 
Adelomyia melanogenys . 
Not determined. 
- Chlorostilbon chrysogaster . 
. Phaéthornis Eurynome 


} Heliopedica melanotis 


. Glaucis melanura 
. Chlorostilbon Atala 
. Thaumatias leucogaster 


i Florisuga mellivora 


. Thalurania Eriphyle . 
. Klais Guimeti 


} Lepidolarynx mesoleucus 
. Chlorostilbon Phaéthon . 
. Eulampis holosericeus 


Ramphomicron microrhynchus 


\ Acestrura micrura . 


. Oreotrochilus leucopleurus . 
. Thaumatias Milleri 


i Mellisuga minima . 


. Not determined. 

. Loddigesia mirabilis 

. Calliphlox ? Mitchell . 
. Cynanthus Mocoa . 

. Chlorolampis auriceps 


} Selasphorus platycercus . 


.. Phaéthornis consobrinus . 


} Chrysolampis moschitus . 


.. Eriocnemis Mosquera 

. Chrysolampis moschitus’. 
.. Cometes ? Glyceria 

. Acestrura Mulsanti 


. Not determined. 
. Lepidolarynx mesoleucus 
. Polemistria chalybea . 


| Grypus neevius . 


. Chlorostilbon Napensis ; 
. Augastes scutatus 


Neera . 
niger . 


nigra . 
nigricincta 
wericinctus . 
nigricollis 


207 


. Chrysuronia Neera 
. Florisuga atra 

. Mellisuga minima . 
. Mellisuga minima . 


} 


nigrirostris, Reichend. . 
. Eriocnemis nigrivestis 


nigrivestis 
nigrofasciata . 
nigrofasciatus 
nigrotis 
nitens . 
nitidifrons 
nitidissimus . 
nitidus 
niveipectus 
niveiventer ©. 
niveiventris . 
niveoventer . 
Norrisi 
Nuna . 
obscura 
obscurus . 


, Gel. . 


Ocai 


(inone 

opaca . 
opisthocomus 
Orbignyi . 
ornata . 

ornatus 
orthura 
orthurus . 
Osberti 

Oseryi 

Otero . 
Ourissia . 9... 
pallidiceps . . 
Pamela - 
Pamele 
Pampa 


paradisea . 
paradiseus 

, Gmel. 
parvirostris . 
parvula . 
Parzudaki 
Parzudhaki . 
Pauline . 
pavoninus 
pectoralis 
Pegasus 
Pella 
personatus 
Peruana . 
Peruanus . 


ochropygos, Natt. . 


} 


Pygmornis nigricinctus . 


Lampornis Mango . 
Not determined. 


Thalurania nigrofasciata . 


. Heliothrix auritus . 

. Chlorostilbon nitens . 

. Thaumatias nitidifrons 

. Chlorostilbon prasinus 

. Lampornis Mango. 

. Thaumatias chionopectus 
. Erythronota niveiventris . 
. Evythronota niveiventris . 
. Erythronota niveiventris 
. Hemistilbon Norrisi . 

. Lesbia Nuna. < 

. Pygmornis Idalie . 

. Campylopterus obscurus . 
. Clytolema rubinea . 

. Not determined. 

. Hemistilbon Ocai . 


. Phaéthornis Pretrei, Reichenb. 


. Chrysuronia Ginone . 
. Metallura cupreicauda 
. Cephalepis Loddigesi . 
. Eriocnemis D’Orbignyi . 


Lophornis ornatus . 


. Orthorhynchus ornatus . 
. Calliphlox amethystina . 
. Calliphlox amethystina 

. Chlorolampis Osberti . 

. Phaéthornis Oseryi 

. Leadbeatera Otero . 

. Sporadinus? Maugexi. . 
. Heliomaster pallidiceps . 


Agleactis Pamela . 


. Sphenoproctus curvipennis . 
. Sphenoproctus Pampa 

. Panoplites flavescens . 

. Topaza Pella 

. Not determined. 

. Oxypogon Guerini 

. Agleactis parvula. . 

. Heliotrypha Parzudaki 

. Sporadinus Riccordi . 

. Metallura tyrianthina 

. Phaéthornis, Reichend. 

. Lampornis gramineus 

. Chrysolampis moschitus . 

. Topaza Pella : 

. Schistes personatus 

. Spathura Peruana . : 
. Chlorostilbon Peruanus. —. 


eae: 


Petasophora . 
Petasophorus 
phenolema . 
phaenolema . 
pheenoleuca . 
Phaéthon . 
Pheeton 
Phaon . 
Philippi . 


Pichincha 


2 
} 


208 


Petasophora serrirostris . 
Heliothrix phanolema . 


Chlorostilbon Phaéthon . 


- Cometes Phaon 


Pheebe, Less. et Delatt. 


pileatus 
pinicola 
platura 
platurus . 
platycerca 
platycercus . 
polytmus . 
Poortmani 
Popelairii 


porphyrogaster . 


porphyrura . 
porphyrurus . 
Poucheti . 
Pouchettii 
prasina 


prasinoptera . 
prasinus . 


—— ee 


Pretrei 
Prevosti . 
Primolii -. 
Primolina 
Primolinus 
pristina 
Prunellei . 
Prunelli . 
puber . 
Pucherani 
puella. . 
pulchra 
punctatus 
punctulatus . 
puniceus . 


purpuratus, Gmel.. 


purpurea . 
purpureiceps 
pygmea . , 
pygmzus . 


ee 


Pyra . 
quadricolor . 
Quitensis . 
radiosus . 
Raimondi 
rectirostris 


° . 
° . ° 
; } 
. . 

. ° 


Phaéthornis Philippi : 
Not determined. 
Oreotrochilus Pichincha 


- Orthorhynchus cristatus 


Heliomaster Leocadize 
Discura longicauda 


| Selasphorus platycercus . 


Aithurus polytmus 


» Panychlora Poortmanni . 
» Prymnacantha Popelairei 


Helianthea typica . 
Lampornis porphyrurus . 


Heliothrix auriculatus 


- Chlorostilbon Atale . 
- Chlorostilbon prasinus 
- Eulampis jugularis : 
- Chlorostilbon chrysogaster . 
- Chlorostilbon prasinus . 
- Polytmus viridissimus . 
- Phaéthornis superciliosus 
- Lampornis Prevosti 


Metallura Primolii 


- Amazilia pristina . 


} Lampropygia Prunellei -, 


. 


Chlorostilbon chrysogaster . 


» Chlorostilbon prasinus 
- Thalurania venusta 
. Calothorax pulchra 


| Lampornis Mango 


. Orthorhynchus cristatus 
. Not determined. 


. Lampropygia purpurea 
. Heliothrix Barroti 


« 


| ‘Pygmornis pygmxa . 


- Pygmornis Aspasize 

» Mellisuga minima 

. Pygmornis rufiventris 
» TopazaPyra . . . 
. Cyanomyia quadricolo 
. Lampornis Mango 

» Metallura Quitensis 

. Cometes sparganurus 
. Sporadinus Ricordi 

. Doryfera rectirostris . 


yecurvirostris 
refulgens . 
Regine 
regis 
Regulus . 
Reishenbachi 
remigera . 
Rhami 
rhodotis . 
Ricordi 
Riefferi 
Rivoli 
Rivolii 
Roberti 
Robinson . 
Rosa 


Fosse 2. 


ruber . 
rubinea 
rubineus . 
rubinoides 


rubra . 
Ruckeri 


rufa 


ruficandatus : 
ruficaudus, Vieill. . 


ruficeps 
ruficollis . 
rufigaster 


rufiventris 


rufocaligata . 


rufocaligatus 
rufus . 


rutila . 
Sabina. 
Sabinse 
sagitta 
Salvini 
sapphirina 


Sappho 
Sasin . 


Saucerottei 


Saul 
Saule . 
Saula . 
scapulata . 
Schimperi 


. Schreibersii : 


scintilla 
Sclateri 
scutatus . 


sephanoides . 


serrirostris 
similis 


sapphirinus : 


209 


PAGE 
. Avocettula recurvirostris . . . . . 114 
.  Uhalumanametnipense. 9 6 5 aay 
. Lophornis Regine . ssh wh aoe 


. Calliperidia Angele, Reichenb. 
. Lophornis Regulus . . . a yr athtitlaagie ee 


. Chrysolampis moschitus ... . . 116 
. Spathura Underwoodi . . .. . . 100 
- Lamproleme, Ritamd ee gs: eo OM 
~« Aopisopnorariokiie gs Sb tc ee AOD 
~sepomsciiiiseiiearlige §.. . TS 
. Pyrshophena Racor eo. io a 158 

Hmeenes talvers: a. f. - eee 
. Phonon Robert a ee 
. Hustephanus Fernandensis. . . . . 142 


Cheetocercus Rose . ...-. . . . 92 


s: Beles phone Miss so. ek a hy ea OO 
| Ciytolema AMEE Ts ose oe EOE 


. Pheolema Afquatorialis . . . . . 148 
. Phmolema rubinoides . |. °. . « . 142 
+ ROMPSOUUS ITM ag 6’ es a ke OO 
« SAMUI AIRC ye ee OO 
=o AGIRUIOL PREM pol 6 Ns ee 
+ OR PMOPUH TOMS oe pe eg a eee 


Clytolema rubinea . . .. . . . 134 


. Not determined. 

» Ramphomicron ruficeps. . . . . . 109 
~ Gi pieremerete es fe sy Se 
~ eyemMornisetfenditdcss. ©. {<6 ot ln 20449) 
(a yem@orms vunyemrns ©, ", “ast as 
. Byemonns wiiryoumis '. 4 Se aS 


} Spathura PUMOCH AAD” ne a LOO 


. Campylopterusrufus. 1... . . . 54 
FJ OLAS MOLUSH UTS) oat ee ape tants mort sen aS 
. Pyrrhophena cinnamomea. . . . . 156 


| Adclomyia melanogenys. . .-. . . 118 


. Seatienrora Otero on Ve 
. Chistes Say, . . 9. . . 174 
Pe yOCMeMe |. 4 gh ey Pee 
.. Jyisebams sapling: 9). 
+ IAQ CHEIE EAGHGR). sty Wy og ce te 
. Hylocharis sapphirma . . . .°% . 171 
. Cometes sparganurus. . . . . . . 103 
- Melo pMOrUS FUTUR tose: oe eee CO 
. Sauesrotiid typi. vl. Ae. 162 


Toafresnaya Soule, . 4. -. 4): » £0 


. Eucephala scapulata . . . . . . . 166 
se (Circe Aeirosimisan serge ee 16D 
MlolememOClNCwversl see ey TS 
PASelespnommersemullaens ssa, . SO 
. Heliomaster Sclateri . . . . . . . 189 
rp LUPEEISA ZoFS) ISCOLUIEN NIU) = oer A a a a 14 


. Hustephanusgaleritus . . . . . . 141 
. Petasophorus'serrirostris . §. . . | 194 
. Chlorostilbon Phaéthon. . . . . . 175 


i a i 


simplex 


Sitkensis . 
smaragdicaudus 
smaragdina . 
smaragdineum . 
smaragdinicollis 
smaragdinis . 
smaragdinus 


smaragdo-cerulea . 
smaragdo-sapphiri- 


nus, Shaw . 
Sophize 
sordida 
sparganura 
sparganurus . 
spatuligera 
Spencei 
Spixi 
splendens. 


splendidus, Vieill. 


squalida . 
squalidus . 
squamata . 
squamosa . 
squamosus 


Stanleyi 
stellatus 
stenura 

Stokesi ; 
striatus, Gael. . 
striigularis 
strophiana 
strophianus . 
strumaria. 
Stuartee 

suavis . 
Suecicus . 
superba 


superbus . 


superciliosus 


Surinamensis 


Swainsoni 


Sylphia 
syrmatophorus . 
Temmincki . 


Tendali 
tephrocephala 


210 


. Aphantochroa cirrhoch'oris. 
. Calothorax cyanopogon . 

. Eriocnemis cupreiventris 

. Selasphorus rufus . 

. Cynanthus Mocoa . ; 
. Chlorostilbon chrysogaster < 
. Eucephala smaragdo-cerulea 
. Metallura smaragdinicoliis . 


\ Cynanthus Mocoa . 
. Eucephala smaragdo-cerulea . 
\ Hylocharis cyanea, Reichend. 


. Saucerottia Sophie 
. Pheoptila sordida . 


Cometes sparganurus . 


. Spathura Underwoodi 
. Heliangelus Spencei . 


Grypus Spixi 


: Campylopterus splendens 


Campylopterus Villavicencio 


. Leadbeatera splendens 

. Not determined. 

. Phaéthornis squalidus 

. Phaéthornis squalidus 

. Hriocnemis squamata . 

. Lepidolarynx mesoleucus 
. Grypus neevius . : 
. Lepidolarynx mesoleucus 
. Ramphomicron Stanleyi. 
. Aithurus polytmus 

. Panychlora stenura 

. Hustephanus Stokesi 

. Not determined. 


Pygmornis striigularis 


a] Heliangelus strophianus . 


: saint se magnificus . 

. Heliomaster Stuartz . 

. Pyrrhophena Riefferi 

. Trochilus Alexandri . 

. Augastes scutatus 

. Heliomaster longirostris 
. Augastes scutatus 

. Heliomaster longirostris . 
. Phaéthornis superciliosus 
. Phaéthornis malaris 

. Phaéthornis Pretrei 

. Glaucis hirsuta 

. Florisuga mellivora 

. Threnetes leucurus 

. Topaza Pella 

. Sporadinus elegans 

- Doricha enicura 

. Lesbia Gouldi : 

. Phaéthornis syrmatophorus 
. Lepidolarynx mesoleucus 
. Pterophanes Temmincki. 
. Calothorax, Reichend. 


Thaumatias albiventris 


tephrocephalus . 


thalassina 
thalassinus 


Thalia, % Gould, » Reich. 


Thaumantias 


—_ 


Phaumatias , 
Theresiz . 


Tobaci 
Tobagensis 
Tobago 


Tomineo, Gmel. 


torquata . . 
torquatus, Shaw 
tricolopha 
tricolor 

tristis . 
Tschudi . 
Turneri 

typica . 


typicus 
typus . . 
tyrianthina . 
tyrianthinus . 
Underwoodi . 
urochrysa. 
urochrysia 
uropygialis . 
varius, Gmel. 
ventilabrum . 
venusta 


venustissimus . . 
-venustus . 


Veraguensis . 
Verreauxi 
versicolor 
verticalis . 
verticeps . 
vesper . 
vespera 
vestinigra . 
vestita . 


yestitus 
Victorix . 
Vieilloti . 


Vieillotii . 
Villaviscensio 
villosus 

viola 

violacea 
violaceus . 


i 


. Thaumatias albiventris . 
. Petasophora thalassina 
. Petasophora Anais 


Petasophora thalassina 
Unknown to me. 
. Polytmus virescens 


. Thaumatias Linnzi 

. Thaumatias albiventris 
. Chrysobronchus viridicaudus . 
. Polytmus viridissimus 


f Thaumatias Linnzi 


. Not determined. 

. Bourcieria torquata 

. Not determined. 

. Prymnacantha Popelairei. 
. Selasphorus platycereus . 
. Patagona gigas . 4 

. Thalurania Tschudi . 

. Leucippus chionogaster . 
. Lampropygia — 

. Helianthea typica . 

. Saucerottia typica . 

. Juliamyia typica . 

. Myiabeillia typica . 

. Saucerottia typica . 

. Phaéthornis Guyi . 


} Metallura tyrianthina . 
. Spathura Underwoodi 
} Chalybura urochrysia 


. Eriocnemis vestita . 

. Not determined. 

. Spathura Underwoodi 

. Thalurania venusta 

. Eulampis jugularis 

. Augastes scutatus . 

. Lampornis Veraguensis . 
. Polemistria Verreauxi 

. Cepbalepis Delalandi . 

. Thaumatias brevirostris . 
. Cyanomyia cyanocephala . 
. Cyanomyia quadricolor . 
. Thalurania verticeps . 


} Rhodopis vespera . 


. Eriocnemis nigrivestis 

. Eriocnemis cupreiventris 
. Eriocnemis vestita . 

. Eriocnemis vestita . 

. Lesbia Amaryllis 

. Polemistria chalybea . 

. Mellisuga minima . 

. Petasophora serrirostris . 


. Campylopterus Villavicencio . 


. Pbhaéthornis Oseryi 
. Heliotrypha viola . 


\ Eulampis jugularis 


violicauda 
violiceps . 
violifer 
violifera 
violifrons . 


virescens .. 


virginalis . 
viridans 
viridescens 
viridicaudata 
viridicaudus . 
viridiceps . 
viridigaster 
viridigastra 
viridipallens . 
viridipectus . 


viridis . 


viridissima 


viridissimus . 
viridiventris . 
Vuleani 
vulgaris 
Wagleri 
_ Warszewiczii 


Watertoni . 
Wiedi . 
Williami . 
Wilsoni . 
Xantusi 
Yarrelli 
Yarugui . 
Yaruqui . 


Yucatanensis . 


Zantusi . , 
Zémeés . 
ZONUrA . 


212 


Lampornis Mango . 


. Cyanomyia violiceps 
* “\ Helianthea violifera 


. Heliothrix violifrons . 
. Doryfera Johanne . 

. Polytmus viridissimus 
. Polytmus virescens 

. Lampornis virginalis . 
. Aithurus polytmus . 

. Polytmus virescens 

. Pygmornis Aspasie 

. Polytmus viridissimus 

. Thaumatias viridiceps 


Pyrrhophena viridigaster 


. Delattria viridipallens 

. Thalurania nigrofasciata. . 
. Chaumatias Linnei 

. Polytmus virescens 

. Polytmus viridissimus 

. Lampornis viridis . 

. Thaumatias Linnei 


Polytmus viridissimus 


. Thaumatias Linnzi 

. Chlorostilbon prasinus 

. Pyrrhopheena viridigaster 
. Ramphomicron Vulcani .. 
. Leucochloris albicollis 

. Thalurania? Wagleri. 

. Diphlogeena Aurora 

. Saucerottia Warszewiczi .. 
. Thalurania Watertoni 

. Eucephala cyanogenys 

. Metallura Williami 

. Lampropygia Wilsoni 

. Heliopxdica Xantusi . 

. Myrtis Yarrelli. . 


Phaéthornis Yaruqui . 


. Pyrrhopheena Yucatanensis . 
. Heliopsdica Xantusi . 
. Tryphzna Duponti 
. Pheoptila zonura . 
. Pygmornis zonura . 


Cambridse University Library, 
ant 


a 


deg SS. 


PROSPECTUS 


OF THE WORKS 


ON ORNITHOLOGY, 


AND ON 


THE MAMMALIA OF AUSTRALIA, — 


BY 


JOHN GOULD, F.R.S., ETC. 


All the Author’s works are in Imperial Folio, forming a regular 


series. They are— 


I. A CENTURY OF BIRDS FROM THE HIMALAYA MOUN- 
TAINS. 1 Vol. Imperial F olio, containing 80 Plates, with 
descriptive letter-press. Price £14 14s. London 1832. 


This work, of which no copies remain, was commenced in January 
1831, and completed in August 1882. It contains figures and descriptions 
of 100 Birds on 80 Plates which were at that time either new or very im- 
perfectly known. 


Il. THE BIRDS OF EUROPE. 9 Vols. Imperial Folio, com- 
prising 449 Plates, with descriptive letter-press, Introduction, 
&e. Price £76°8s. London 1837. 

The whole of the copies of this work have been disposed of; and when. 
any one of them is offered for sale on the demise of a Subscriber, or from 
other causes, it realizes considerably more than its original cost. Thus in 
barre 1860 a bound copy was sold for £120, and an unbound one realized 


Ill. A MONOGRAPH OF THE RAMPHASTIDA, OR FAMILY 
OF TOUCANS. 1 Vol. Imperial Folio, containing Fifty-two 
Plates, with descriptive letter-press, dc. Price £12 12s. 
London 1854. 


An edition of this work was published in 1834 at the price of £7; but 
the extensive researches carried on during the last twenty years among 
the Great Andean Ranges of South America having led. to the discovery 
of many additional and beautiful species belonging to this extraordinary 
group of Birds, a revision of the work not only became necessary, but. an 
entirely new edition was deemed imperative. This edition, comprising 
every known species, with the whole of the Plates redrawn, and with an 
Introduction containing much valuable information derived from au- 
thentic sources, was published in 1854 at the price of £12 12s. 

The history of this South American group is very peculiar; and their 
manners and actions are as remarkable as their aspect; in some respects 
reminding us of the Hornbills of India and Africa, while in others they 


are unlike those of any other group. 


R 


en 


ae eS 


214 


IV. A MONOGRAPH OF THE TROGONIDA, OR FAMILY 
OF TROGONS. 1 Vol. Imperial Folio, containing Thirty-six 
Plates, with descriptive letter-press. Price £8. London 1838. 


This work, like the Monograph of the Toucans, comprises the history 
and figures of all the species of the group known up to the date of pub- 
lication. The members of the Trogonide are remarkable for a gorgeous 
style of colouring, for their recluse habits, and for the union of insect 
diet with such aliments as fruits and berries, in accordance with which 
the beak is modified; they are divided between the warmer latitudes of 


-America, India, and the adjacent islands, with the exception of one 


species, which is peculiar to Africa. 

The same reasons which induced the Author to publish a new edition 
of the Monograph of the Ramphastide, have also rendered another edi- 
tion of this Monograph desirable ; and accordingly one is now in prepa- 
ration, comprising all the new species and information acquired respecting 
this family of birds during the last twenty years. It willbe caegeted in 


four Parts, price £3 3s. each, the first of which is now ready for delivery. 


V. THE BIRDS OF AUSTRALIA. 7 Volumes, Imperial Folio, 
containing Figures of 600 species, with descriptive letter-press 
and a large amount of Introductory matter. Price £115. 
London 1848. 


This work was originally published in Thirty-six Parts, each contain- 
ing Seventeen Plates with descriptive letter-press, at the price of Three 
Guineas each Part, with the exception of the Thirty-sixth, the price of 
which, in consequence of the large amount of introductory matter, is 
£4 12s. 

The Birds of Australia, comprised in seven handsome folio volumes, is 
considered by the Author as the most important and original work which 
he has yet published. It contains the Ornithology of one vast portion of 
the globe, and that portion of no small importance in whatever point of 
view it be considered. Impressed with the necessity of rendering this 
tribute to science-worthy of acceptation, the Author left England for 
Australia in May 1838; and after remaining there for two years in order 
to study the habits and manners of the birds and quadrupeds, he returned 
with a great amount of novel, strange, and interesting facts. The habits 
of the Bower-birds, the Mound-makers (Talegalla, Leipoa, &c.), and of 
the Lyre-bird, when made known, were deemed especially marvellous ; 
but every statement has been subsequently confirmed to the letter. To 
dilate upon the peculiarities of the Fauna and Flora of Australia is not the 
Author’s present aim. Suffice it to say, he has endeavoured to the utmost 
to do justice in this work to its Ornithology ; and so well have his labours 
been received, that very few copies of this great work remain on his hands 
for disposal, and ere long, like the “ Birds of Europe,” they will be at a 
premium. ; 

As the at present unexplored portions of Australia become more and 
more known, additional species of birds will doubtless be discovered, ren- 
dering a Supplernent to the work necessary, in order to keep the subject 
complete; and this will be issued in Parts as a sufficient number of novel- 
ties come to hand : thus, a- portion of the new and interesting species lately 
brought home by the naturalist and officers of several of H.M. surveying 
ships, and some derived from other sources, have appeared under the title 
of “Birds of Australia,” Supplement, Parts I., II., IIT., price £3 3s. each ; 
and any other novelties that may arrive will in like manner be published, 
and when a sufficient number of parts to form a volume have been issued, 
a, Title-page and every other requisite will be supplied. 


215 


VI. A MONOGRAPH OF THE ODONTOPHORINA, OR PAR- 


TRIDGES OF AMERICA. 1 Vol. Imperial Folio, containing: 


Thirty-two Plates, with descriptive letter-press. Price £8 8s. 
London 1850. 


The interest which attaches to this work is threefold. First, it dis lays, 
even to the most unpractised eye, the broad distinction which subsists 
between the Partridges of America and those of Europe; secondly, the 
species are all remarkable for the elegance of their forms and for the chaste 
beauty of their colouring ; and thirdly, at no distant date these Birds will 
doubtless be regarded in America as our Partridges in Europe are, as 
game, and perhaps preserved by law—their flesh being as delicate for the 
table as that of our ordinary bird, from which, however, they differ con- 
siderably in the structure of the beak, and in their habits and economy. 


VII. THE BIRDS OF ASIA. 


To no portion of the globe does there attach so much interest as to that 
vast extent of the Old World which we designate Asia. It is there that 
all the productions of nature essential to the well-being of man occur in 
the greatest abundance. The most important of our domestic quadrupeds, 
the most valuable and interesting of our domestic Gallinaceous birds, were 
first reclaimed in Asia. That the Zoology, then, of such a country should 
have called forth the notice and study of able minds cannot be surprising ; 
and yet it is remarkable that no one has attempted a work comprehending 
a general history of its OrnrrHoLtogy. This hiatus in Ornithological 
literature the Author proposes to fill up by publishing a work on “The 
Birds of Asia,” precisely similar in every respect to his former works on 
“The Birds of Europe” and “The Birds of Australia.” Its size and 
manner of execution will be the same; and it will be published in Parts, 
price Three Guineas each. 

Of this work thirteen Parts are published; and for the present it will 
appear at the rate of not more than one or two Parts a year. 


VIII. A MONOGRAPH OF THE TROCHILID”A, OR HUM- 
MING-BIRDS. 


Having from an early period devoted himself to the study of these 
beautiful birds, and having acquired a most valuable and extensive collec- 
tion of a group essentially peculiar to America and its adjacent islands, 
the Author determined upon publishing a Monograph of a family unequalled 
for the gorgeous and ever-changing brilliancy of their hues, the variety of 
their form, the singularity of their habits, and the extent of their territorial 
distribution. Anxious to render his representations of these lovely objects 
as faithful as possible, the Author instituted a series of experiments upon 
a new mode of colouring, which has been so far successful, that the birds 
are as closely imitated as art can hope to see accomplished ; he has also 
endeavoured, as far as possible, to associate them with the japon of its 
own region, thereby adding an additional charm to’a work which he 
trusts will be equally acceptable to the artist and the lover of nature, 
and which has been so successful that it bids fair to be the most popular 
of his productions. 

This Monograph is now complete in 25 Parts, forming five volumes, 
in which 360 species are figured: 24 of these parts contain Fifteen Plates 
each, with descriptive letter-press, and the 25th Title-pages, Introduction, 
&c. The price of each part is £3 3s. The copies remaining unsubseribed 
for may be had complete, or for the convenience of -future subscribers at 
the rate of 5 Parts a year, commencing with J anuary 1862, in which case 


A SN eet Ea 


ee 


—. 


216 


they will be required to complete their copies, as an equal number of 
all the Parts have been printed, and the drawings effaced from the stones ; 
this work, therefore, like its predecessors, will shortly become scarce. 


IX. ICONES AVIUM, or Figures and Descriptions of new and 
interesting Species of Birds from various Parts of the World, 
forming a Supplement to the Author’s other Works. 


The object of this Work is explained in the Title: it will be issued as 
novelties of interest occur, in Imperial Folio Parts containing ten species 
with descriptive letter-press, price £1 15s. each. Two Parts have been 
published, one in 1837,.the other in 1838. 


X, THE MAMMALS OF AUSTRALIA. 


The Author’s visit to Australia having enabled him to procure much 
valuable information respecting the habits and economy, and many new 
species, of the singular and interesting Mammalia of that country, he has 
determined upon publishing a work on the subject. With respect to the 
importance of such a work no doubt can exist; and as the Author is 
deeply impressed with this idea, so will he endeavour to render it equal 
to its associate publication on the Ornithology of that remarkable region. 

In its execution this work will be precisely similar to the “ Birds,” and 
will be completed in Thirteen or Fourteen Parts, each containing Fifteen 
Plates, price £3 3s. each. 

Twelve parts have been published, and have been so highly approved 
of, that by many they are regarded as more interesting than the “ Birds.” 
The Thirteenth Part is now in preparation, and the work is consequently 
-approaching its close. 


The Author begs to add that, when possible, he will be happy to 
perfect any sets at present incomplete, upon the possessors commu- 
nicating to him at the following address their wish on the subject. 


LONDON: PUBLISHED BY THE AUTHOR AT 26 CHARLOTTE 
STREET, BEDFORD SQUARE, WC. 


September 1, 1861.