C7TTAR PRADESH GAZETTE, FEBRUARY 5, 1955 [PAHT VIII OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNION, UTTAR PRADESH ics nt,dff S ion lU'6) of the Indian Trade Unions Act, 11) -Mi WliTfas lhr> &uikar Karramfhari Sangh, Captaincarij, Deoua, registered as trado Union und»r no. 843 of lOoO-jl. duly mtinvited m*3 on July I, 1954 in fnrm ''H" as required under regula- tion l."i of the U. P. Trade Union's Regulations, 1U27, tliat tho above- - i wad dissolved on the 26th September, 19-j3. And whpr.'iis Ui^ undersigned is fully -ii,tibD>d that the said SEUigh hw romphed with thr provisions of action 27(1) of the Indian Tr,id» Union? Aft, 1W6 and tho iibovpmmej Sangli ha* been dis- solved in accordance with its registered constitution. Now, fchoreforc, the notice of dissolution of Sink ir Karauu'lian 3ingh, Captainqanj, Denria, i& hort-by re of the Indian Trade Unions Act, IMC. Whereas tho Bliarat Horneo Pharmacy Karamc-hari Sangli, Lucknow. registered under no, llfiti of 19.J3-54 as a Trade Union, was inspected by an Assistant Trado Union Inspector on June 25, 1954, and the inspector noticed that the members of thp union were not paying their ^ubsmption^ and no meeting? of the union w ere h"ld. It, therefore, appears that the taid Sangh has ceuaud to exiht. And whoreaa the Secretary of the Union was askpd, vide my office registered A. D. letter, d-ited September 18, 1034, tu icport if the Singh was functioning in terms of its constitution, but no reply ha^ yetbeenroceii-edtothat letter. Now, therefore not.iue under srciiou 10(6) of the Indian Trado Unions Act, 192ki, 1-9 hereby given to Bharat Homeo Pharmacy, Karamchari Singh, Lucknow, to show cause to tho undersigned on or before tho expiry of two months from the date of receipt of thig notice, why the Certificate of Registration granted to it be not cancelled, on tha ground thab the Sangh has ceased to exist. UDAIBIR SINGH, December 11, 1034. By order, RAJA RAM, 15.2/53.] IXTHEOOURTOFTHE JUDGE OF SMALL CAUSES, MEER.UT Present : fcjm SHAH OHULAM SHARID, Insolvency Judge (Exercising the insolvency powers) Insolvency Case No. 67 of 1954 In the wntterof — BliHEfwan DQSS, gun of Han Singh, Khattri, resi- dent of quarter no. 2, ward 3, Usari Gate, Meerut City (debtor) . . . . Applicant. WHEBEAS the abuvemtmed applicant hat applied to the Court, bya petition, rlated the 13th November, 1054, to be declared an inholvpnt under yoc-tions 10/13 of tho Pi ovincial Insolvency Act V of 1'JLZO, it fe hereby notified t]xat the Court haa fixed the 18t]j (eighteenth) day of Manh, 1035, for hearing of the aforesaid application. By order, RAJA RAM, M,nnsariin. IN THE OOU11T OF THE JUDGE OF SMALL CAUSES, GORAKHPUR Insolvency Petition No. 5/53 I it the matter of— HarihurPrasad Kdlwar,aonof Sheo Barat Ram, resident of village Gaura, tappa Kaparwar, pargana Huhvimpur Majhauli, poat office Barhfl] Bazar, district Deoi-ia . . . . Insolvent. TAKE notice that the abovonamed insolvent has applied at the CJiirtforhis discharge, and that the Court haa fixed the 25th (twenty- fifth) day of February, 1055, at 10 o'clock for hearing the appli- cation. Dated this the 22nd day of January, 1955. By order, B. N. BHARTI, IX THE COURT OF THE JUDGE OF SMALL CAUSES, MEERUT (Ejterciaiitff the insolcenty power*) Insolvency Case No. 1 ol 1955 .fa tto mutter tf— RamSaran alias Sarna, sou cf Bailey, caste Zargar, resident of Tikri, pargana Bamawa, tahsil Sardhona, district Meerut (debtor) .. Applicant. WHEEBAS the dbovenamed applicant hue applied to the Coui-t, by<i petition, dated tho llth January, 1033, to be declared an insol- vent under sections 10/13 of the Provincial Insolvency Act V of 102(>, ifria hereby notified that the Court ban fixed the 2 jth (twenty- fifth) day of Man-h, 1903, for hearing of the aforesaid application. IN THE COURT OF FIRST CIVIL JUDGE (AS INSOLVENCY COURT) KHERI Present: SRI P. C SBIMAL, Judge Insolvency Petition No. 1 of 1955 (Notice under section 10) In the matter of— Sri Ram Mehrotrd, bouof L. Barati Lai, caste Khattri, resident of mohalla Hathipur Lakhimpur, pargana and district Khen Applicant (in- solvent. IX THE COURT OF THE JUDGE OF SMALL CAUSES, MEERUT FIYsort: SEI SHAH GHULAM SBAHID, Intoh-cjtty Judye (Exercising the Insolvency poucrt) Insolvency Case No. 72 of 1954 Inthe matter of— Deep Chand, son of Badlumal, caste, Vaish Agor- wal, resident of mo-uza Loom, post office Khas, parguna Chapraulia, tahsil Baghpat, diBtru-t 3fc*n»t .. .. .. Applicant. WaEBEABtheabovenamcd applicant ha& applied to this Court bya petition, dat<>d the 4th T&cember, 1054, to be declared an tnaolvent, under sections lfi/13 qif the Provincial Ineolvencv 4ct \% of mo, il is hereby notified that the Court has fixed the 18th ay 1933, for hearing of the aforesaid appli" 1. Seth Ram Swaroop Mehrotra, bou of L. Jagtin- nath Prasad Mehrotra, Proprietor of Messrt. Panni Lai Jagannath Prabad, Khattn, Chau- raha Bdzar, Lakhimpur City, pargana and diatriLt Kheri. "2 Mesai-b. Munna Lai Fateh Chand, Commission Agents, Go/lla Mandi, Lakhimpur, pargana and district Kheri. 3. Seth Salik Ram, son of Seth Data Ram, Khattri, resident ofmohalla Hathipur Lakhim- pur, pargana and district Kheri. 4. Seth Amar Nath, son of Seth Shyam Kishore, Khattn, resident of mohalla Hathipur, Lakhimpur, pd-rgana and district Kheri. 3. Dorey Lai, father's name nob known, Kurmi, Chathia \Vala, Gola Gokaran Nath, parcana Haidcrabad, district Kheri. U- Jag Mohan Singh, fathers' name not known, Thakur, resident of Piparia Dih P. S. Gola tahsil Mohamdi, district Kheri. 7. Nanak Chand Agarwal, adopted son of Lala Basanti Lai, Commission Agents, Lakhimpur Ba,zarj piirgana and district Kheri Opposite party. KAJABAM, TAKE notice that the above mentioned mtolvcnt has appht d to to tha Court for declaration asinsolvent and that the Court has nixed the lOth(tonth) day of January, 1055, at 10 o' clock for hearing the appliuatiou and objections. By order, tS. A. MUSTAFA, Mwnaarim.