Full text of "The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis I 1920 Part 1"

See other formats

VOL. I

1920

PART 1

THE

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL

PSYCHO-ANALYSIS

DIRECTED BY

PROFESSOR FREUD, M. D., LL. D.

OFFICIAL ORGAN

OF THE

INTERNATIONAL PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL ASSOCIATION

EDITED PROVISIONALLY BY

ERNEST JONES, M. D.

ACTING PRESIDENT OF THE ASSOCIATION

PUBLISHED QUARTERLY BY THE

INTERNATIONAL PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL PRESS
I.ONDON • VIENNA • NEW YORK

THE

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHO-ANALYSIS

is issued quarterly, the four parts constituting a volume of between 400
and 500 pages. Besides original articles, abstracts and reviews, it will
contain the Reports of the International Psycho-Analytical Association,
of which it is the Official Organ.

The Journal will be obtainable by subscription only, the parts not
being sold separately; the subscription rate per volume will be £1.10.0'
or S 6.00, according to the country. Subscriptions should be addressed
to THE INTERNATIONAL PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL PRESS,
45 New Cavendish Street, London W.l or to PUBLICITY DIRECTION
19 East 48th. Street, New York.

The reduced subscription rate for members of the International
Psycho-Analytical Association will be 18/— or S 4.00.

Manuscripts and editorial communications should be sent to Dr. Ernest Jones,
111 Harley Street, London, W. 1. Manuscripts should be type-written, and a copy
should always be retained by the author. Authors will understand that a trans¬
lation of their article may be published in the Internationafe ZeitsSrift fiir PsySo^
anafyse or Imago if thought suitable. Authors will receive 25 reprints of their
work free, and more can be ordered at cost price.

THE

INTERNATIONAL PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL PRESS

45 New Cavendish Street, London, W. 1
Retailers of all literature on Psycho-Analysis.

Publishers of

THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHO¬
ANALYSIS
and of

THE ^INTERNATIONAL PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL

LIBRARY.

Sole Agents in England for the Intemationaler Psychoanalytischer
Verlag, whose publications, the Internationale ZeitschrifCfur Psycho¬
analyse, Ima£‘o and the Internationale Psychoanalytische Bibliothek, can
be obtained from the Press.

Further particulars on third page of cover,

A full prospectus will be sent on application.

THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL

PSYCHO-ANALYSIS

VOLUME I 1920 NUMBER 1

OPEN LETTER

Among the many reconstructive problems awaiting the “Inter¬
national Psycho-Analytical Association” after its long period of
enforced inactivity I judge none to be more urgent or important
than the reconsideration of the position of our literary organs. It
has become evident that, in view especially of the remarkable in¬
crease of interest in Psycho-Analysis in America and England
during the past few years, the Internationale Zetschrift fiir drzt-
hche Psychoanalyse can no longer be expected satisfactorily to
fulfil its function as the international organ, at least on its former
lines. Various possibilities of re-organization suggest themselves,
such as, for instance, the publishing of a duplicate organ in Ger¬
man and English, but, after having been able at last to communicate
again and consult with my presidential colleagues,! have decided that
the most satisfactory method would be to found a distinct Journal in
the English language, in close contact with the Zeitschrift, and if
possible under a similar editorship. The new Journal would rank
equally with the Zeitschrift and Imago as an official organ of the
“International Psycho-Analytical Association”, with special reference
to the English-speaking public, and would contain the official Reports
of the Association. As — with the present difficulties and delays in
communication and arrangements — it will take many months
work to issue the first number, I have considered it my duty not
to wait for the next Congress before making a start in the matter,
but to set this in motion at once, leaving it then to the Congress
to make any suggestion it may think desirable. I have therefore

INTERNATIONAL

PSYCHOANALYTIC

UNIVERSITY

DIE PSYCHOANALYTISCHE UNIVER5ITAT IN BERLIN

OPEN LETTER

asked one of our present editors, Dr. Ernest Jones, who from his
central geographical position and knowledge of the conditions in
different directions seemed the most suitable person, to undertake
this task, and he has consented to do so, as also to act for me
as President of the “International Psycho-Analytical Association”
until the next Congress. I shall leave in his hands, in collaboration
with Dr. Otto Rank, the working out of the technical details, and
conclude what I have to say here with expressing my warmest
wishes for the success of the new venture, on the future of which
so much will depend.

Budapest, October 1919 S. FERENCZI, M.D.

President of the International Psycho-
Analytical Association.

EDITORIAL

We propose to say here something about the history and aims
of the new Journal. In the past two years it has been repeatedly
suggested, by workers in both America and England, that the time
was ripe for the establishment of a special Journal in English de¬
voted to Psycho-Analysis and this was also independently recog¬
nised by the editors of the Internationale Zeitschrift fur drztliche
Psychoanalyse. The question was discussed, indeed, but postponed,
at the last International Congress, at Munich in 1913. The main
consideration, though not the only one, that has made this
increasingly imperative is the unexpectedly great progress in recent
years of the interest taken in our Science by readers not familiar
with the German language, and the desirability of making accessible
to them the latest researches in the subject. It has long been evi¬
dent that a periodical published mainly in German could not in¬
definitely subserve the function of an official international organ,
and, since interest in Psycho-Analysis has extended from German¬
speaking countries to English-speaking countries far more than to
any other, it was only a question of time when such a Journal
as the present one would have to be founded: with the cessation
of the war, the resumption of scientific activities, and the re¬
establishment of contact between different countries, that time may
be judged to have now arrived.

Of the suggestions referred to above, more than one were to
the effect that a Psycho-Analytical Journal be founded as a private
venture. The present Editor and others have advanced against this
idea the following considerations. The multiplying of independent
journals in the same subject, wasteful in its duplication of reviews
and other editorial work, correspondingly restricted in circulation,
and productive of much unnecessary trouble to readers who wish
to search the literature, is in general one of the banes of scientific
work; a strongly supported central organ, systematically and
comprehensively codifying all that is published on the given sub¬
jects, is in every way preferable to inchoate dissipation of effort
and dispersal of material. With Psycho-Analysis, however, there

EDITORIAL

are, in addition to these general reasons, special ones why con¬
centration is highly desirable. The history of Psycho-Analysis has
once more shewn, as might have been anticipated from a know¬
ledge of human nature, that mankind has two main methods of
defence against disagreeable truths: the first, more obvious, and
therefore less dangerous one is direct opposition, the new truths
being denied as false and decried as obnoxious; the second, more
insidious, and much more formidable one is to acquiesce in the
new ideas on condition that their value is discounted, the logical
consequences not drawn from them, and their meaning diluted until
it may be regarded as ’’harmless”. The opposition to Psycho-
Analysis, particularly in America, is assuming more and more the
second of these forms, under all sorts of specious guises and by
the aid of various seductive catchwords that appeal to attitudes
or principles entirely legitimate in themselves, such as “resistance
to dogma”, “freedom of thought”, “widening of vision”, “re-adjust¬
ment of perspective”, and so on. That this opposition may not
only be displayed by outside antagonists, but may assume subtle
forms also amongst those having a nearer acquaintance with the
subject, has been shewn on two or three notable occasions already
and will doubtless be shewn again in the future. A notable, and
perhaps unique, feature of this second form of defence against
Psycho-Analysis is that it conceals its negative antagonistic nature
by pretending to develop a more positive attitude towards Psycho-
Analysis; it makes use of its technical terms. Libido, “repression”,
etc, but in such a way as to rob them of their intrinsic meaning.
From the standpoint of Psycho-Analysis, therefore, the two forms
of defence, open opposition and what has been well called “wild
Psycho-Analysis”, must be regarded as fundamentally identical in
tendency, and will be so treated in this Journal. Psycho-Analysis
is in quite a different position from other departments of Science,
such as chemistry, physics, etc, the main principles of which are
securely based. It follows that those interested in countering these
disruptive and reactionary tendencies which necessarily accompany
Psycho-Analysis, and in maintaining and developing hardly-won
truths so long as these are not contravened by fresh evidence, have
special motives, no longer requisite or operative elsewhere in Science,
in cooperating towards a common end; it was indeed because of
these considerations that the “International Psycho-Analytical
Association” with its officiaj organs, was founded. It is hoped.

EDITORIAL

therefore, that this Journal, like its companion journals the Zeitsckrift
and Imago^ will serve the purpose of combining and focussing all
activities for the common aim of the Science of Psycho-Analysis.
The Journal will not only concern itself with psycho-analytical
material, but will also critically review all publications dealing
with the lines of research that diverge from Freud’s original work.
The status of the Journal will be as follows. It will be published
by the “International Psycho-Analytical Press”, with private financial
help ; the definite editorship and organization of the “Journal” will
be arranged at the Congress of the “International Psycho-Analytical
Association”, of which it will rank, equally with the Internationale
Zeitsckrift fur drztliche Psychoanalyse^ as the official organ.

It is proposed that the contents of the Journal will be on the
following lines. They will be confined to the subject of Psycho-
Analysis and kindred studies having a bearing on Psycho-Analysis.
They will thus not attempt to cover the whole field of psycho¬
pathology, especially as this is being already done by two journals
in America, the Journal of Abnormal Psychology and the Psycho¬
analytic Review^ and two in England, the British Journal of
Psychology (Medical Section) and the Journal oj Neurology and
Psychopathology, On the other hand, the contents will go beyond
the clinical sphere and will embrace as well pure Psycho-Analysis
and the other branches of applied Psycho-Analysis, e. g. its re¬
lation and application to literature, education, mythology, philology,
sociology, anthropology, and so on. An arrangement has been made
whereby a mutual exchange of articles, abstracts and other ma¬
terial may be effected between the Journal on the one hand and
the Zeitsckrift and Imago on the other whenever this is found
suitable. Whenever possible one article in each number will be of
an elementary and didactic nature. In the first three numbers the
abstracts and reviews will mainly take the form of collective
reviews of the psycho-analytical literature published in different
countries during the past six years; afterwards they will of course
be current ones. The official “Reports of the International Psycho-
Analytical Association” will be published verbatim in both the
Journal and the Zeitsckrift, It is intended to make a complete
index of the Journal from the beginning, to be published perhaps
every five years, which will constitute a reference book to sub¬
jects and contents as well as of titles of papers.

DR. JAMES JACKSON PUTNAM

ERNEST JONES

One of the greatest blows that the young science of psycho¬
analysis has suffered has been the death of Dr. J. J. Putnam, who
was amongst the staunchest of its supporters. It is our mournful
duty here to relate a record of his life and career, especially in
so far as the latter concerns our science.

Dr. Putnam was born in Boston on October 3, 1846, and was
therefore just over 72 when he died on November 4, 1918. He
had a distinguished ancestry from some of the most notable
families of New England. His father was a well-known physician in
Boston, and his grandfather was for many years Judge of the
Supreme Court of the State of Massachusetts. His mothers father,
who married a Cabot, was Dr. James Jackson, one of the most
notable figures of his time in American medicine; Dr. Putnam
published a memoir of his life in 1905.

Dr. Putnam graduated at Harvard University in 1866, at the
early age of 20. Soon afterwards he continued his medical
education abroad, studying at Leipsic, Vienna, and London under
Rokitansky, Meynert, and Hughlings Jackson respectively. His
decision to specialise in neurology was thus early evident, and
on his return to America he was appointed Lecturer on Nervous
Diseases at the Harvard Medical School, in 1872. In 1893 he was
made the first Professor of Diseases of the Nervous System at
that University, and held the appointment until 1912, when he
was made Professor Emeritus. The other institution with which
he was most prominently connected was the Massachusetts General
Hospital, where he established a neurological clinic and was its
chief from 1874 to 1909. In the earlier years he maintained a
neuropathological laboratory in his own house, the forerunner of
the present Department of Neuropathology at the Harvard Medical
School. As a teacher of elementary students he was perhaps not
at his best. The subject was an optional one, was not considered

DR. JAMES JACKSON PUTNAM

of great practical value, and Dr. Putnam perhaps lacked the
ability to present complex subjects in an elementary way, the very
richness of his knowledge and the scrupulous conscientiousness with
which he attempted to communicate all of it militating against
complete success. Those very qualities, however, made his teaching
all the more valuable to more advanced students of the subject.

Dr. Putnam was the last surviver of a group of men who
founded the American Neurological Association, in 1874, and
was also a founder of the Boston Society of Psychiatry and
Neurology. He took an active share in the work and discussions
of these societies, as well as of several other medical ones, e. g.
the Association of American Physicians, the American Psycho-
pathological Association, and the American Psychoanalytical Asso¬
ciation, throughout his medical career, becoming in turn President
of most of them. He was undoubtedly one of the pioneers of
American Neurology, and the lack of sympathy or help with
which this branch of medicine was at first regarded only served
to bring out his determination and persistence, both prominent
traits in his character. He did an enormous amount of original
research in clinical and pathological neurology and published over
a hundred papers on it. Perhaps the most notable were his con¬
tributions to the study of neuritis, especially the lead and arsenical
varieties, and other affections of the peripheral nerves; he did
more work on the cord and nerves than on the brain. He wrote
extensively, but always with painstaking care. He was a master
of English, and his work would be worth reading if only for the
language in which it is expressed.

In the earlier years his professional interests centered around
the problems of organic neurology, but in the last fifteen years
of his life they shifted to those of clinical psychology. As will be
seen from the subjoined bibliography, nine tenths of his writings
in this field belong to this latter period. The transition seems to
have been made via the subject of the traumatic neuroses. Both
because of his commanding position in neurology and because
of his remarkable uprightness and impartial honesty he was
extensively called upon to give evidence in medico-legal cases of
this nature, and his unfailing sympathy, especially with the badly
understood sufferings of others, soon led him to take a special
interest in the traumatic neuroses.

The first real contribution to clinical psychology dates from 1904,

ERNEST JONES

and, as it is of interest to us in several respects, a short account
may be given of it. With characteristic modesty, the author reviews
the latest work done in psychotherapy “by special Students of
the Subject” The opening sentence strikes the note of sympathy
with neurotic suffering, which at that time was much rarer even
than at present. It runs: “There are but few kinds of disorders
which interfere more with the happiness of the community than
those which cause a painful and hampered action of the mind
though without implying the presence of serious mental derange¬
ment (i. e. insanity)”. He goes on to say: “It frequently happens
that the question of happiness or unhappiness of patients with
severe forms of neurasthenia (i. e. neurosis) depends largely on
influences which would ordinarily be classed as social rather than
medical, though, in fact, the physician can help greatly in
determining what the outcome of these influences shall be ...
The time must surely come when nervousness and even serious
mental derangements will be regarded in much the same light as
other forms of illness, and with the growth of such a sentiment
as this there will be great mitigation of individual suffering.” The
stress here laid on the social aspects of the neuroses was typical
of his permanent attitude, in sharp contrast to the then prevailing
narrower medical view of them as a “functional” disorder of the
brain, and it adumbrated his subsequent activity in widening the
famous Social Service of the Massachusetts General Hospital to
include the social care of neurotics, a work which has now become
a national movement in America, under the name of “Mental
Hygiene” The best account of the social service movement is
given in a later article entitled: “The Treatment of Psychasthenia
from the Standpoint of the Social Consciousness,” (No. 10 in
bibliography). After this introduction he reviews the latest work
of Janet, Prince, and Sidis on the subconscious, and remarks:
“These studies have taught us that, while we regard ourselves as
free agents and our mental life as forming one harmonious
mechanism, no one is really as free, no one’s life is so complete
a unity as he would like to think.” He comments on the renewed
wave of interest in hypnotism with the shrewd remark that “There
has been, I think, a clearer recognition of the fact that one cannot
deal satisfactorily with “suggestion” until a great deal more has
been learned of the nature of the diseases in the treatment of
which “suggestion” sometimes proves a partial aid.”

DR. JAMES JACKSON PUTNAM

Thus equipped, with insight into the social nature of neurotic
disorders, with some knowledge of subconscious activities and a
restless desire to know more about them, with an unusual sympathy
for neurotic suffering and a remarkable aptitude for opening his
mind to. the ideas of other workers, he approached the works of
Freud. He seems to have read them attentively in the following
year, and, although it was about three years before he entirely
accepted the new theories, he published early in 1906 a paper of
remarkable interest in more than one respect. In the first place,
apart from a few reviews of the “Studien” — amongst which one
by Mitchell Clarke in Brain in 1898 is always worthy of memory
— this paper may be said to be the first one on psycho-analysis
in English, and the first adequate account of it in that tongue.
He gives an excellent, though brief, summary of the “Studien”,
“Traumdeutung”, and “Psychopathologie des Alltagslebens”, and
comments on them as follows with characteristic generosity: “All
of the publications are written in a fluent style and with an
abundance of illustration which give evidence of wide reading,
general cultivation, and imaginative ability, and have secured for^
him (i. e. Freud) an attentive audience, as well among professional
psychologists as among neurologists of his own stamp.” He relates
three cases in which he has attempted to apply the psycho-analytic
method; as is to be expected, the analyses would rank as quite
elementary, though by no means devoid of interest. He then
summarises his attitude towards the matter. His criticism is not
at all of the usual kind, but mainly relates to his doubt, on
philosophical grounds, whether what is revived from ancient
memories and emotions constitutes the original ones or rather an
after-effect of them. On the practical psychotherapeutic side he
doubts whether the method is necessary except in extreme cases,
and tries to coordinate it with other methods of substitution
with which he is more familiar. His “side-tracking” method of
treatment was evidently an attempt to increase sublimation, to
replace the neurotic symptoms by social activities. To sum up, at
this point he was deeply interested in psycho-analysis, but as yet
unconvinced.

In December 1908 Dr. Morton Prince invited me to be his
guest in Boston, when I first met Dr. Putnam. On arriving I found
that I was expected to discuss psycho-analysis before a private
gathering of distinguished psychologists and neurologists, and

ERNEST JONES

immediately perceived that Dr. Putnam stood out from the rest
in his open-minded attitude and the serious desire for knowledge
with which he plied question after question. These were, as well
as the almost embarrassing attitude of modesty towards a man
more than thirty years his junior, the main features of the im¬
pression he produced on me on this first meeting, and the friendship
thus begun was continuous and close until his death. In the
following May we collaborated in a symposium on psychotherapy
held by the American Therapeutic Society at New Haven, and
by that time I could definitely regard him as a psycho-analytical
colleague. In August of the same year came the visit of Professor
Freud, accompanied by Drs. Jung and Ferenczi, to America. He
joined our company — Dr. Brill was also there — and, like the
rest of us, derived great benefit both from the lectures and the
advantages of personal intercourse with Professor Freud. He enter¬
tained the latter afterwards at his summer camp in the Adirondack
mountains, and I have no doubt that the impressions of that
stay formed an abidingly pleasant memory for both.

These events made a turning-point in Dr. Putnam s attitude
towards psycho-analysis. From that time on he remained a con¬
vinced and enthusiastic adherent, and the greater part of his
activities in the remaining ten years of his life was devoted to
extending the knowledge of the new science. In the same year
he wrote a long essay entitled “Personal Impressions of Sigmund
Freud and his Work”, which excited widespread attention in
America, and from then on he never ceased to expound the
principles of psycho-analysis before congresses, medical and
psychological societies, in addresses and courses of lectures, besides
in voluminous writings. In 1911 he came to Europe, visited
Dr. Jung at Zurich — Professor Freud was also there —
and read a paper at the Weimar congress, where European
colleagues had the opportunity of becoming acquainted with
his personality.

Although some of his psycho-analytical writings are of con¬
siderable technical interest (especially, for example. Nos. 24, 25,
30, 43) most of them are of an expository nature. In presenting
the principles of* psycho-analysis, and in discussing the many ob¬
jections that have been raised against it, he excelled, and I do
not know any one who has matched him in this field. Written in
a charmingly easy and fluent style, the combination of clear

DR. JAMES JACKSON PUTNAM

conviction with tolerant considerateness for even the most annoying
of opponents had a peculiarly persuasive effect, and it is to be
hoped that they will find a more permanent home than in the various
journals where they are at present scattered.

His attitude towards the psycho-analytical theory had the
following special feature, to omit mention of which would be to
give a very one-sided view of his relationship to psycho-analysis.
On the one hand he was fully convinced from personal experience
both of the truths of tjje individual conclusions reached by the
application of this method and of their general social importance.
On the other hand, however, he maintained that it was highly
desirable, if not absolutely essential, to widen the basis of psycho¬
analytical principles by incorporating into them certain philosophical
views especially concerning the relationship of the individual to
the community at large and to the universe in general. He regarded
this not as a criticism of psycho-analysis, but as a proposed
enrichment of it; indeed it was rather a quarrel with science as
a whole than with psycho-analysis, though for obvious reasons it
came more to the front in the case of the latter. On this matter
alone, which evidently meant a great deal to him personally, he
was really obstinate, and he could never be brought to see how
it could be possible to take the results of psycho-analytical in¬
vestigations quite empirically without feeling the need to commit
oneself to any particular philosophical system. For years he
maintained a steady correspondence with me on this question,
and I fear it was a genuine disappointment to him that his views
made so little impression on his psycho-analytical colleagues. To
me the most remarkable point in the whole affair was that the
strength with which he held his views made no difference to his
conviction as to the truth of the details of psycho-analysis; in
spite of his desire to fuse science and philosophy, in practice he
had no difficulty in keeping them apart. I do not know of any
other example in which philosophical views have not become
placed in the service of some or other unconscious resistance,
manifesting themselves in the guise of a sceptical opposition to
some aspect of psycho-analysis.

He behaved characteristically as regards the various attempts
to read another meaning into the results of psycho-analysis.
Jung’s renunciation of these frankly puzzled him. He could sym¬
pathize with what he called Jung’s desire for a broader formulation

ERNEST JONES

of psycho-analysis, having a similar tendency himself, but he wrote
unequivocally: ‘T cannot in the least sympathize with the rejection
by Jung of Freud’s theories of repression, infantile sexuality, and
fixation” (No. 42, 1917). Adler’s views, which have obtained a wider
vogue in America — where they count among their adherents no
less a man than Stanley Hall — gave him more trouble, possibly
because he had himself many traits in common with Adler’s chief
character-type. He gave his work a very sympatlietic hearing and
discussed it at length before the New York Psychoanalytic
Society in 1915 (Nr. 40). He gave Adler high credit for his earlier
ideas on Organminderwertigkeit^ etc., but insisted that these were
in no sense incompatible with the psycho-analytical theory and
greatly regretted Adler’s subsequent rejection of the latter.

When I put together my personal impressions of Dr. Putnam,
the following attributes strike me as the most prominent in his
character. First of all his extraordinarily high ethical standard of
uprightness, honour, fairness and loyalty. Absolutely correct
conduct and attitude were to him so natural and obvious that he
was more bewildered than disapproving when he heard of the
opposite. He had no trace of the “puritanical” intolerance that so
often goes with a strict moral code. His quite extraordinary
tolerance extended as much to views as to behaviour. Audi alteram
partem was a first maxim with him, and the degree of his
singular open-mindedness, receptivity, and liberality of thought may
be measured from the fact alone that he became an enthusiastic
adherent of such revolutionary ideas as those of psycho-analysis
with which he first entered into close relationship when he was
over sixty years of age. Equally natural to him was an innate
modesty of both thought and manner ; so marked was this, indeed,
that at times it bordered on a slightly morbid self-depreciation.
He always regarded himself as a beginner, a learner, as primarily
a student, an attitude much fortified by a restless striving for
knowledge.

Dr. Putnam was further characterised by a charming amiability
which was also innate. His considerateness and kindness for others
were complete, and he could always be relied on to help some
one else, as I know from my own experience (I may mention
only one example, how he came to Toronto to support me in a
symposium on psychotherapy held by the Canadian Medical
Association, before which a couple of well-known neurologists

DR. JAMES JACKSON PUTNAM

had planned to discredit me). There remains to be mentioned a
valuable character trait, namely, persistence and determination, one
which stood him in good stead in many periods of his life, not
least during the fight to obtain a hearing for psycho-analysis in
America. Tenacious adherence to convictions won by close thought
and direct experience, combined with a benevolent tolerance for
the views of others and a readiness to open his mind at all
times, make a rare combination in actual life — in spite of the
fact that most people think they possess them to the full — and
these Dr. Putnam had in the highest degree.

Of the place he won in his private circle, in the American
medical profession, in the development of neurology, in widely
ramifying social services, it does not become us to speak here.
To us it is only too clear that we have lost a loyal and gifted
friend and co-worker, whose name will always be remembered with
honour and gratitude in the history of psycho-analysis.

BIBLIOGRAPHY OF PSYCHOLOGICAL WRITINGS

1. “Neurasthenia.” In Buck’s “Reference Handbook of the Medical Sciences”,
1887, vol. V, p. 160.

2. “Remarks on the Psychical Treatment of Neurasthenia.” Boston MedicaC
and SurgicaC Journaf, 1895, vol. CXXXII, p. 505.

3. “On the Etiology and Pathogenesis of the Post-Traumatic Psychoses and
Neuroses”, JournaC of Nervous and MentaC Disease, 1898, vol. XXV,
p. 769.

4. “Neurasthenia.” In Loomis and Thompson’s “American System of Practical
Medicine”, 1898, vol. IV, p. 549.

5. “The Traumatic Neuroses.” In Warren and Gould’s “International Text-
Book of Surgery”, 1900, vol. 11, p. 979.

6. “A Consideration of Mental Therapeutics as Employed by special Students
of the Subject”, Boston MedicaC and SurgicaC JournaC, 1904, vol. CLI,
p. 179.

7. (With G. A. Waterman). “Certain Aspects of the Differential Diagnosis
between Epilepsy and Hysteria”, Boston MedicaC and SurgicaC JournaC,

1905, vol. CLllI, p. 76.

8. “Recent Experiences in the Study and Treatment of Hysteria at the
Massachusetts General Hospital; with Remarks on Freud’s Method of Treat¬
ment by ‘Psycho-Analysis.’” JournaC of ASnormaCPsgcSoCogg, February,

1906, vol. I, p. 26.

9. “The Bearing of Philosophy on Psychiatry, with Special Reference to the
Treatment of Psychasthenia”, British MedicaC JournaC, October 20, 1906,

p. 1021.

ERNEST JONES

10. “The Treatment of Psychasthenia from the Standpoint of the Social Con¬
sciousness.” American Journaf of the Mecficaf Sciences^ January 1908,
vol. CXXXV, p. 77.

11. “The Philosophy of Psychotherapy”. Ps^cBotherajf}/^ 1908, vol. I, No. 1;
vol. Ill, No. 3, 4.

12. “The Psychology of Health,” Ps}f(£otBerap^, 1908—1909, vol. I, No. 2, 3, 4;
vol. II, No. 1.

13. “The Service to Nervous Invalids of the Physician and the Minister”,
Harvard JBeofogicaf Review^ April 1909, vol. I.

14. “The Nervous Breakdown”, PsgcBotBerapg, 1909, vol. Ill, No. 2, and
TBe Boston Home and ScBoof Mews Letters, January 1913, vol. IV,
No. 2.

15. “Personal Impressions of Sigmund Freud and his Work, with Special Re¬
ference to his recent Lectures at Clark University”. Journaf of ABnormaC
PsycBofogy, December 1909 and February 1910, vol. IV, p. 293, 372.

16. “The Relation of Character Formation to Psychotherapy”, Part of a
Symposium on Psychotherapy held by the American Therapeutic Society,
May 6,1909. Published in a volume entitled ”Psychotherapeutics” by various
authors (Badger, Boston, 1910).

17. Introduction to Brill’s Translation of Freud’s, “Drei Abhandlungen zur
Sexualtheorie.” (Nervous and Mental Disease Monograph Series. New
York, 1910.)

18. “On the Etiology and Treatment of the Psychoneuroses”, Boston Medicaf
and Surgicaf Journaf, July 21, 1910, vol. CLXIII, p. 75. Read before the
Canadian Medical Association, June 1910. A Translation appeared in the
ZentrafBfatt fur PsgcBoanafgse, 1911, Jahrg. I, Heft 4, S. 137, under the
title “Uber Atiologie und Behandlung der Psychoneurosen*’.

19. “Personal Experience with Freud’s Psychoanalytic Method’’, Journaf of
Mervous andMentaf Disease, November 1910, vol. XXXVII, p. 657. Read
before the American Neurological Association, May 3, 1910. A Translation
appeared in the ZentrafBfatt fur PsycBoanafgse, 1911, Jahrg. I, Heft 12,
S. 533, under the title “Personliche Erfahrungen mit Freuds psychoana-
lytischer Methode”.

20. “A Plea for the Study of Philosophic Methods in Preparation for Psycho¬
analytic Work”, Journaf of ABnormaf PsgcBofogg, October 1911, vol. VI,
p. 249. Read before the American Psychopathological Association,
May 10, 1911.

21. “Uber die Bedeutung philosophischer Anschauungen und Ausbildung ftir
weitere Entwicklung der psychoanalytischen Bewegung”, Vortrag gehalten
am III. Kongrefi der Internationalen Psychoanalytischen Vereinigung zu
Weimar, September 22, 1911. Imago, 1912, Jahrg. I, Heft 2, S. 101.

22. “On Freud’s Psychoanalytic Method and its Evolution”, Boston Medicaf
and Surgicaf Journaf, January 1912, vol. CLXVI, p. 115, 122. Harvey
Lectures delivered at Philadelphia in 1912.

23. “Aus der Analyse zweier Treppentraume”, ZentrafBfatt fiir PsgcBoanafgse,
Marz 1912, Jahrg. II, Heft 5, S. 264.

24. “Ein charakteristischer Kindertraum”, ZentrafBfatt fur PsgcBoanafyse,

1912, Jahrg. II, Heft 6, S. 328.

DR. JAMES JACKSON PUTNAM

25. “A Clinical Study of a Case of Phobia”, JournaCof ABnormaC PsycBo-
fogy, October 1912, vol. VII, No. 4, p. 277. Contribution to a Sym¬
posium held by the American Psychopathological Association, May 29,
1912.

26. “Comments on Sex Issues, from the Freudian Standpoint”, New YorB
Medicaf Journaf, June 15, 1912, p. 1249 and June 22, p. 1306. Reprinted
in brochure form as No. 2 A of the Boston Medical Library, New York,
1912, (Pp. 26.).

27. “Antwort auf die Erwiderung des Herrn Dr. Ferenczi” (“Philosophie und
Psychoanalyse”), Imago, 1912, Jahrg. I., Heft 6, S. 527.

28. “Physics and Metaphysics”, Boston Medicaf and Burgicaf Journaf,
January 16, 1913, vol. CLXVIII, No. 3, p. 106.

29. “Psychoanalyse und Philosophie” (Erwiderung auf das Referat von
Dr. Theodor Reik), ZentrafBfatt fur PsycBoanafyse, Marz 1913, Jahrg. Ill,
Heft 6, S. 265.

30. “Bemerkungen ilber einen Krankheitsfall mit Griselda-Phantasien, Inter>*
nationafe YeitscBriftfur drztfiSe PsycBoanafyse, Marz 1913, Jahrg. I, Heft 3,
S. 206.

31. “Presidential Address”, delivered before the American Psychopathological
Association, May 1913, Journaf of ABnormaf PsycBofogy, August 1913,
vol. VIII, p. 168.

32. “On Some of the Broader Issues of the Psychoanalytic Movement”,
American Journaf of tBe Medicaf Sciences, March 1914, vol. CXLVII,
No. 3, p. 389.

33. “Dream Interpretation and the Theory of Psychoanalysis” (Answer to
Dr. Meyer Solomon), Journaf of ABnormaf PsycBofogy, April 1914, vol. IX’
p. 36.

34. “The Present Status of Psychoanalysis”, Boston Medicaf and Surgicaf
Journaf, June 11, 1914, vol. CLXX, No. 24, p. 897. Read at a Joint
Meeting of the Medical Section of the Boston Medical Library with the
Suffolk District Medical Society, April 1, 1914.

35. “Services to be Expected from the Psychoanalytic Movement in the Pre¬
vention of Insanity”, Journaf of tBe American Medicaf Association, Novem¬
ber 1914, vol. LXIII, p. 1891.

36. “Psychoanalysis considered as a Phase of Education”, Journ. of Nerv.
and Ment. Dis., 1914, vol. XLI, No. 666.

37. Human motives, (p. 179. Little, Brown and Co., Boston, 1915.).

38. “The Necessity of Metaphysics”, Journaf of ABnormaf PsycBofogy, June
1915, vol. X, No. 2, p. 88.

39. “Mental Preparedness.” (Massachusetts Society for Mental Hygiene, No. 14,
Boston, 1916).

40. “The Work of Alfred Adler, considered with Special Reference to that of
Freud”, PsycBoanafytic Review, April 1916, vol. Ill, No. 2. Read before
the New York Psychoanalytic Society, November 1915.

41. “On the Utilization of Psychoanalytic Principles in the Study of the
Neuroses”, Journaf of ABnormaf PsycBofogy, August 1916, vol. XI, No. 3,
p. 172.

ERNEST JONES

42. “The Work of Sigmund Freud”, JournaC of ABnormaC PsySofogy, August

1917, vol. XII, No. 3, p. 145. Read before the American Psychopathological
Association, May 24, 1917.

43. “Sketch for a Study of New England Character”- Journat of ABnormaf
PsycBofogy, June 1917, vol. XII, No. 2, p. 73.

44. Introduction to ri. W. Frink’s "Morbid Fears and Compulsions”, 1918.

45. “The Interpretation of Certain Symbolisms”, PsycBoanafytic Review, April

1918, vol. V, No. 2.

46. “Two Cases of Psycholepsy of Emotional Origin, in which Psychoanalysis

proved of Service in inducing Social Re-Adjustment”, Medicine,

February 1918, New Series, vol. XIII, No. 2, p. 105.

47. “Elements of Strength and Elements ot Weakness in Psychoanalytic
doctrines”, PsycBoanafytic Review t April 1919.

Of the foregoing. Numbers 6, 7, 8, 10, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 26
were reprinted in the first five volumes of the Reports of the Harvard De¬
partment of Neurology. Doubtless others were reprinted in the later volumes,
but I have no means of access to them at the moment.

ONE OF THE DIFFICULTIES OF PSYCHO-ANALYSIS

SIGM. FREUD, M. D., LL.D., Vienna.

I may say at the outset that in my title, “One ot the Diffi¬
culties of Psycho-Analysis”, I refer not to an intellectual difficulty
that makes Psycho-Analysis hard to understand, but to an affective
one which estranges the feelings of those to whom it is introduced,
and makes them less inclined to accept or be interested in it. As
will be noticed, both difficulties come to the same thing, for it is
not so easy to understand a subject which one approaches with
insufficient sympathy.

As some of my readers may still be strangers to the subject,
it will be well for me to retrace some of the first steps. In Psycho-
Analysis, from a great number of individual observations and im¬
pressions, something that may be called a theory has at last been
formed, known as the Libido Theory, Psycho-Analysis, as is well
known, occupies itself with the explanation and cure of what
are called nervous disorders. A mode of approach to this problem
had to be found, and it was decided to seek for this in the life-
history of the instinctive tendencies of the mind. Propositions
concerning these tendencies became, therefore, the basis of our
conception of nervous disorder.

The psychology that is taught in the schools gives us little
satisfaction in answer to questions about the problems of feeling,
and its information is never more doleful than it is on this
question of the instincts.

It was left for us to discover a starting point. Hunger and love
are popularly distinguished as the representatives of the instincts
which ensure self-preservation and propagation respectively. In
acknowledging this obvious division, we distinguish in Psycho-
Analysis also between instincts of self-preservation or Ego-tenden¬
cies on the one hand, and sexual impulses on the other. We call
the mental aspect of the sexual instinct Libido (sexual hunger),
this being analogous to hunger, desire for power, etc., in the sphere
of the Ego-tendencies.

SIGM. FREUD

Starting on this basis, we then make our first significant dis¬
covery. We find that for the understanding of neurotic disorders
we learn more from a study of the sexual impulses than from
that of any others; in fact, that neuroses are, so to speak, the
specific diseases of the sexual function. We learn that the quan¬
tity of Libido and the possibility of satisfying it and of disposing
of it through satisfaction are the factors which decide whether
a person develops a neurosis or not: that, further, the form of
the disorder is determined by the particular path of development
which the sexual function of the individual patient has traversed,

or _ as we put it — by the fixations his Libido has undergone

in the course of its development: that, lastly, we are able, by
means of a rather technical form of psychical manipulation, to
throw light on the nature of several groups of neuroses, and at
the same time to resolve them. The greatest success of our
therapeutic efforts has been with a certain class of neuroses that
arise from the conflict between the Ego-tendencies and the sexual
impulses. For, in mankind, it may happen that the demands of
the sexual impulses, which extend far beyond the individual, appear
to the Ego as dangers threatening its self-preservation or self-
respect. When that is so the Ego takes up the defensive, denies
the sexual impulses the wished-for satisfaction, and forces them
into those by-paths of a substitutive gratification which constitute
nervous symptoms.

The psycho-analytic method of treatment then manages to
revise the process of repression and to find a better solution of
the conflict, one compatible with health. Uninformed Opponents
accuse us of being one-sided in our estimation of the sexual im¬
pulses, and call our attention to the fact that there are other
interests in the human mind beside sexual ones. This, however,
we have not for a moment forgotten or denied. Our one-sidedness
is like that of the chemist who traces all compositions to the
force of chemical attraction: he does not thereby deny the force
of gravitation; he merely leaves the evaluation of it to the
physicist.

During therapeutic work we have to concern ourselves with
the distribution of the patient’s Libido\ we try to discover to which
ideational objects his Libido has been attached, and_to make it free
so as to place it at the disposal of the Ego. In this way it has
come about that we have formed a very curious picture of the

ONE OF THE DIFFICULTIES OF PSYCHO-ANALYSIS

original distribution of human Libido, We have had good grounds
for inferring that at the beginning of individual development all
Libido (all erotic impulses, the whole capacity for love) is attached
to one’s own person; as we say, it “engages” one’s own Ego. It
is only later that, in conjunction with the satisfaction of the main
natural functions, the Libido reaches out from the Ego to external
objects, and it is not till then that we are able to recognise the
libidinous impulses as such and to distinguish them from the Ego-
impulses. The Libido can be later released from its attachment to
these objects and again withdrawn into the Ego. The state in which the
Libido is bound up with the Ego we call Narcissism, after the Greek
myth of the young Narcissus who was in love with his own image.

We thus regard the course of individual development as an
advance from Narcissism to Object-love, but we do not believe
that the whole Libido ever passes over from the Ego to the objects
of the outer world. A certain amount of it always remains bound
to the Ego, so that Narcissism survives in a certain degree even
when Object-love is highly developed. The Ego is a great reservoir
out of which the Libido streams towards its destined objects and
into which it flows back again from those objects. The “Object-
Libidd'^ was, to begin with, “Ego-A/^/^^?”, and may become so
again. For complete health it is essential that the Libido should
retain its full mobility. In picturing this reciprocal relationship
(between love of others and self-love) we may think of an amoeba,
whose protoplasma sends out pseudopodia, projections into which
the substance of the body pours, but which can at any time be
again retracted so that the form of the protoplasmic mass is once
more restored.

What I have tried to indicate by the foregoing is the Libido
Theory of the neuroses, on which are founded all our conceptions
of the nature of these morbid states, together with our therapeutic
methods of dealing with them. We naturally regard the premises
of the Libido Theory as valid also for the normal. W^e speak of
the Narcissism of the infant, and it is to the excessive Narcissism
of primitive man that we ascribe his belief in the omnipotence of
his thoughts and therefore his attempts to influence the course of
events in the outer world by the apparatus of magic.

After this introduction I want to show how universal Narcissism,
mankind’s self-love, has up to now been three times badly wounded
by the results of scientific research.

SIGM. FREUD

a) In his first thoughts about his dwelling place, the earth, man
believed that it was the stationary centre of the universe, with the
sun, moon, and planets circling around it. In doing so he naively
accepted the impressions of his sense perceptions, for he could
feel no movement of the earth, and wherever he looked he found
himself in the centre of a circle that encompassed the world of
his vision. He took the central position of the earth to be a visible
mark of its dominance in the universe, and this appeared to be
in good accord with his proclivity to feel himself lord of this world.

We connect the destruction of this narcissistic illusion with the
name and work of Copernicus in the sixteenth century. Long before
him the Pythagoreans had already questioned the privileged position
of the earth, and Aristarchos of Samos, in the third century B. C.,
had stated that the earth was much smaller than the sun and
moved around it. Even the great discovery of Copernicus, therefore,
had already been made before. But when it achieved general recogni¬
tion, human self-love suffered its first blow, the Cosmological one.

b) In the course of his cultural development man achieved a
dominating position over his animal fellow-creatures, but, not
content with this supremacy, he began to place a gulf between
their nature and his own. He denied to them all reasoning power,
arrogated to himself an immortal soul, and pretended to a divine
descent, which allowed him to sever all bonds of community with
the animal world. It is curious that this conceit is still as foreign
to the child as to the savage or to primitive man; it is the outcome
of a later pretentious development. The savage, on the level of
Totemism, has not found it repugnant to trace back his stock to
an animal ancestor. Myth, which contains the deposit of this old
mode of thought, gives the gods animal shape, and the art of the
earliest times pictures them with the heads of animals. The child
perceives no difference between his own nature and that of the
animals. He is not astonished at animals thinking and talking in
fairy tales. A feeling of fear that applies to his human father he
displaces on to a dog or a horse, without thereby intending to
depreciate his father. Only when he is grown-up has he become
so far estranged from animals that he can use their names to
insult people.

We all know that, only a little more than half a century ago,
the research of Charles Darwin, his collaborators and predecessors,
put an end to this presumption of mankind. Man is not different

ONE OF THE DIFFICULTIES OF PSYCHO-ANALYSIS

from, or better than, the animals; he is himself the outcome of
an animal series, related more closely to some, more distantly to
others. His later acquirements have not been able to efface the
evidences, in both his physical structure and his mental dispositions,
of his equality with them. This is the second, the Biological, blow
to human Narcissism.

c) The third blow, which is of a psychological nature, is the
most painful.

However humbled he may be externally, man feels himself to
be sovereign in his own soul. Somewhere in the heart of his Ego
he has set up an organ of observation which watches over his own
impulses and actions, to see whether they accord with his demands.
If they do not so accord they are inexorably restrained and
withdrawn. His inner perception, consciousness, gives the Ego news
of all important occurrences in the working of the mind, and the
Will, guided by these reports, carries out what the Ego directs,
modifies what is prone to accomplish itself independently. For this
soul is not a simple thing, being rather a hierarchy of superordinated
and subordinated agents, a labyrinth of impulses urging to action
independently of one another, corresponding with the multiplicity
of instincts and of relations to the outer world, many of the
impulses being opposites and incompatible with one another. For
satisfactory functioning it is requisite that the highest agent should
know all that is preparing, and that its Will can penetrate
everywhere to exert its influence. But the Ego feels itself certain
both of the completeness and trustworthiness of the reports and
of the capacity of his commands to reach their destination.

In certain disorders, in the very neuroses that have been
studied by us, it is otherwise. The Ego feels itself uneasy; it comes
across limits to its power in its own house, the soul. Thoughts
suddenly emerge, the source of which one does not know, and one
can do nothing to drive them away. These foreign guests seem
to be even more powerful than those subordinated to the Ego;
they resist all the well-tried powers of the Will, remain unmoved
by logical refutation, untouched by the contradictions of reality.
Or there come impulses which are like those of, a stranger, so
that the Ego disowns them; but it has to fear them and to take
precautions against them. The Ego says to itself: This is a disease,
a foreign invasion. It intensifies its watchfulness, but it cannot
understand why it feels so strangely paralysed.

SIGM. FREUD

Psychiatry denies, it is true, that such occurrences mean a
penetration of evil foreign spirits into the mind, but for the rest
it only says with a shrug: Degeneration, hereditary disposition,
constitutional inferiority! Psycho-analysis, on the other hand, under¬
takes to throw light on these uncanny disturbances, engages in
careful and laborious investigations, devises auxiliary conceptions
and scientific constructions, and finally it can say to the Ego.
“Nothing foreign has entered into you; a part of your own mind
has withdrawn from your knowledge and from the command of
your Will. That is why you are so weak in defending yourself.
You are fighting with one part of your strength against the other
part, and cannot gather up your whole force as you would against
an outer enemy. And it is not even the worst or the less important
part of your mental forces that have become so opposed to you
and independent of you. The blame, I have to say, rests on you
yourself. You overestimated your strength when you thought that
you could do what you liked with your sexual impulses and that
you did not need to take the least notice of their aims. Then they
have rebelled and have gone their own dark ways to free them¬
selves from oppression. They have claimed their rights in a manner
that you can no longer sanction. How they have brought this
about and along what paths they have gone you have not learned;
only the results of their work, the symptom that you feel as
suffering, has come to your knowledge. You do not recognise it
then as a product of your own banished impulses, and you do not
know that it is a substitutive gratification of them.

“The whole process, however, is only made possible through
one circumstance, namely that you are mistaken on another point.
You are assured that you learn of all that goes on in your mind,
if it is only important enough, because your consciousness then
reports it to you. And if no news has reached you about something
in your mind, you confidently assume that it cannot exist there.
Indeed, you regard “mental” as identical with “conscious”, i. e.
known to you, in spite of the most evident proofs that there must
constantly be much more going on in your mental life than can
be known to y6ur consciousness. Come, let yourself be taught on
this one point. What is mental in you does not coincide with
what you are conscious of; whether something goes on in your
mind, and whether you hear of it, are two different things. Usually,

I will admit, the news service to your consciousness is enough for

ONE OF THE DIFFICULTIES OF PSYCHO-ANALYSIS

your needs, and you may nurse the illusion that you will learn
of all the more important things. But in some cases, for instance
in the case of such a conflict of impulses as I have mentioned,
the service fails, and your Will then does not reach further than
the extent of your knowledge. But the news received by your
consciousness is in all cases incomplete and often not to be relied
on; often enough, also, it happens that you get news of the events
only when they are over and when you can no longer alter them.
Even if you are not ill, who can estimate what is stirring in your
soul whereof you learn nothing, or are wrongly informed? You demean
yourself like an absolute ruler who contents himself with the infor*
mation given by his highest officials, and does not go down to the
people to hear their voice. Look into the depths of your own being
and learn first to know yourself, then you will understand why
you had to fall ill, and perhaps you will avoid falling ill.”

Thus Psycho-Analysis has wanted to teach the Ego. But both
the explanations — that the life of the sexual impulses cannot be
wholly confined; that mental processes are in themselves unconscious
and can only reach the Ego and become subordinated to it through
incomplete and untrustworthy perception — amount to saying that
the Ego is not master in its own house. They represent jointly the
third injury suffered by mankind’s self-love, which I should like to
call the Psychological one. No wonder, therefore, that the Ego does
not favour Psycho-Analysis, and obstinately refuses to believe in it.

Probably very few have realised with what momentous import
for Science and Life the recognition of unconscious mental processes
is fraught. It was not Psycho-Analysis however, let us hasten to
add, that was the first to make this step. Renowned philosophers
may be cited as predecessors, above all the great thinker Schopen¬
hauer, whose unconscious “Will” may be equated with the “mental
impulses” of Psycho-Analysis. It was the same thinker, by the way,
who in words of unforgettable force reminded men of the
significance of their sexual straining, so invariably underestimated.
Only that Psycho-Analysis does not stay at abstractly affirming
the two theses so painful to Narcissism — the psychical significance
of sexuality and the unconsciousness of mental life — but rather
proves them by means of a material that touches every individual
personally and forces him to face these problems. And that is just
why it brings on itself the aversion and opposition which still spare
diffidently the names of the great philosophers.

ON THE CHARACTER AND MARRIED LIFE OF HENRY VIII

I. C. FLOGEL, B.A., London

It is doubtful whether the married life of any monarch in the
world’s history has aroused such interest and attained such notoriety
as that of Henry VIII. In popular estimation the relations of
King Henry to his wives probably outweigh in fascination all
other features of a lengthy and momentous reign ; while even to the
professed historian the study of Henry’s six marriages — closely
connected as they are with events of great importance occurring
at a particularly critical period in the cultural and political deve¬
lopment of Europe — must also be of very considerable impor¬
tance. No apology is needed therefore for attempting a further
treatment of this theme — even in brief and summary fashion —
if by so doing we can throw a few fresh rays of light upon the
factors which were at work in producing the events recorded in
this page of history^.

A well known historian, commenting on the long series of
Henry’s matrimonial experiences, has justly remarked that “a single
misadventure of such a kind might have been explained by acci¬
dent or by moral infirmity. For such * a combination of disasters
some common cause must have existed, which may be, or ought
to be, discoverable”*. It has seemed to the present writer that
the common cause in question is to be found largely in certain
constant features of Henry’s mental life and character, the proper
understanding of which concerns the psychologist as much as the
historian. It is in the hope of indicating the nature of some of
the more important of these constant features that the present
short essay has been written. The conclusions at which it arrives are

* I am indebted to my wife for first proposing a psycho-analytic treat¬
ment of this subject and for valuable suggestions during the work. My
thanlfg are also due to Miss N. Niemeyer for much kind advice as regards
the historical works to be consulted.

• J. A. Froude, History of England, II, p. 469.

ON THE CHARACTER AND MARRIED LIFE OF HENRY VIII 25

tentative only, and are put forward with all the diffidence that is
due to the circumstance that the writer is very well aware of the
shortcomings of his historical knowledge and training. The histo¬
rical materials bearing on the reign of Henry VIII are now very
numerous, and would require years of patient study for their ade¬
quate assimilation: indeed it is evident that their complete eluci¬
dation and evaluation at the hands of historians are as yet far
from being accomplished. Much that is here suggested may there¬
fore have to be revised, both as the result of expert historical
criticism and of an increased understanding of the relevant facts.
The application of psychological knowledge to the task of inter¬
preting the events of history will however certainly constitute a
very necessary piece of work for future scholarship, and as a
small addition to the relatively few attempts that have been made
in this direction, the following suggestions as to the nature of the
psychological influences at work in the married life of Henry VIII
may perhaps be of some interest both to psychologists and to
historians.

It is unfortunate that, in spite of the many known facts which
bear upon the adult life of Henry VIII, our knowledge of his
early life is very slender. The researches of Freud and of the wor¬
kers of his school have shown that a knowledge of the events of
childhood and of youth is a very valuable aid to the interpre¬
tation of the mental characteristics of later years. In the case of
Henry VIII however we have to be content with few facts and
those mostly connected with affairs of state but little calculated to
throw light on questions of Psychology.

Henry was bom in June, 1491, and was the fourth of his pa¬
rents’ five children, the earlier children being Arthur (Henry’s
only brother), Margaret (^afterwards Queen of Scotland), and Eli¬
zabeth (who died in infancy), while the single younger child was
Mary (afterwards Queen of France and, later. Duchess of Suffolk).
Henry’s father (Henry VII) had ascended the throne of England
as the result of his triumph over Richard III in the last battle of
the War of the Roses, and by his able and successful rule of
24 years had definitely put an end to that bloody and disastrous
struggle. He had claimed the throne by right of inheritance and
conquest; but to add to the strength of his position he had
married Elizabeth of York, eldest daughter of Edward IV, uniting
thus the rival houses whose dissensions had devastated England

1. C. FLUGEL

for the preceding thirty years. There was indeed a difficulty in
the match, inasmuch as Henry and Elizabeth were within the pro¬
hibited degrees of affinity (both being descended from Catherine,
wife of Henry V), a papal dispensation being necessary before the
marriage could legally be made. Henry however, anxious no
doubt for the additional security of title which the marriage would
provide, did not wait to receive the dispensation, and the wed¬
ding was celebrated a few months after he ascended the throne
the dispensation fortunately arriving shortly afterwards.

Throughout the reign there were not wanting efforts of rival
claimants to the throne to displace Henry from the position he
had won, nor uprisings on the part of a people grown ill used to
long periods of settled government. The long conflict between the
rival roses did not give place suddenly to an era of assured inter¬
nal peace, but, in dying, continued for many years to manifest
itself in minor upheavals which formed a continual menace to
the sovereignty of the first of the Tudors. Henry, it is true, suc¬
cessfully weathered every storm that threatened to engulf him,
and was in the main upheld by the great majority of his subjects,
who realised that his rule was the only alternative to a return of
anarchy and civil war. Nevertheless, we cannot but suppose that
the difficulties and dangers which surrounded his father’s throne
must have exercised a powerful influence over the younger Henry s
mind. The envy with which, even in ordinary families, a son is
apt to look upon the superior powers and privileges of a father,
is liable to be intensified when the father enjoys the exceptional
influence and honour appertaining to a king. Under these circum¬
stances any threat to the father’s authority almost inevitably arouses
in the son the idea of superseding the father.

In the present case such ideas were liable to be still further
reinforced by the following facts: —first, that the mothers claim
to the throne (and therefore of course that of her children) was
regarded by confirmed Yorkists as superior to that of the father;
and, secondly, that the marriage of the parents was not a happy
one; the behaviour of the elder Henry being in general much
wanting in warmth and affection towards his consort, in spite of
the good looks, piety and learning by which the latter is reported
to have been distinguished.

The conditions were thus favourable 1) for the arousal in
young Henry’s mind of the hope and the desire to succeed to his

ON THE CHARACTER AND MARRIED LIFE OF HENRY VIE 27

father s place of authority (tendencies which may have been still
further strengthened by the fact that he was invested at a tender
age with various high offices — a device of his father’s for con¬
centrating as much power as possible in his own hands). 2) for
the development of a powerful Oedipus complex, i. e. the desire
to get rid of the father and possess the mother in his stead: the
cold relations between mother and father and the beauty and
goodness of the mother both constituting strong incentives to
that desire.

The hostile feelings towards the father which may well have
arisen under these circumstances were however, in the case of
young Prince Henry, fated to suffer to a large extent a process
of displacement on to the person of his elder brother Arthur. To
ambitious younger sons the privileges of primogeniture are always
irksome; particularly so, it would seem, in the case of royal
families, where the privileges in question are so exceptional in
nature. In the present case young Henry’s title to succeed hi^
father was of course barred by the presence of Arthur — a prince
who seems to have possessed qualities and abilities not inferior
to those of his younger brother, and whose future reign was
destined, in the hopes of many persons, to mark the opening of
a new period of peace and prosperity, free from the unhappy
dissensions of the immediate past^

In 1501, when Henry was ten years old, Arthur, himself then
only just fifteen, was married to Catherine of Aragon, daughter
of Ferdinand of Aragon and Isabella of Castile. Henry himself
was no mere spectator at the wedding ceremony, but led his
sister-in-law and future wife to the altar. At her formal reception
into England six weeks earlier, he had already played an equally
important part. It is not improbable that these events induced in
Henry some degree of jealousy towards his brother, thus adding
a sexual element to the more purely personal envy which may
well already have existed. To meet a comely girl and to hand
her over with much ceremony to a brother — a brother who
already appears to possess more than a fair share of the good
things of life — is a procedure which is well calculated to arouse

* This hope was indicated in the very choice of the name of the young Prince
of Wales — a name which aroused no painful or exciting memories of the
period of civil war, but which was associated with noble traditions of remoter
British history.

I. C. FLUGEL

an emotion of this kind. Students of folklore and legend are
familiar with the not infrequent type of story in which a situation
of this sort is represented — the young hero being despatched
to welcome, and escort to her new home, the bride destined for
the prince or king — stories which usually end with the awakening
of illicit love between the hero and the lady, whose hand is
already promised to another. In the light of later events we may
perhaps be permitted to suppose that Henry, in spite of his youth
did not altogether escape the temptations to which his legendary
predecessors in the same office had succumbed, and that the sex¬
ual elements of the Oedipus complex (which, as we know, are
present in every child, and which, as is abundantly clear to the
psycho-analyst, find expression in the legends in question) received
in this way an additional motive for the transference on to brother
and sister-in-law respectively of the feelings originally directed
on to father and mother.

Arthur and Catherine had but little time in which to enjoy
their married life. For a few months they kept a merry court as
Prince and Princess of Wales at Ludlow Castle, and then Arthur
succumbed to an attack of the sweating sickness which was
ravaging the Welsh borders, leaving Henry therefore as the
legitimate successor to the throne^.

Immediately on the receipt of the tragic news, Catherine’s pa¬
rents — imwilling to abandon the diplomatic advantages offered
by the marriage of their daughter to the English heir-apparent —
started negotiations for the marriage of the young widow to her
still younger brother-in-law. A marriage of this kind was of course
forbidden both by earthly law and heavenly injunction; but fortu¬
nately a dispensation from the Pope was capable of overcoming
both these obstacles. Henry’s father too was not unwilling for the
match : but a dispute arose over Catherine’s dowry, part only of
which had been paid. Ferdinand not only refused to pay theba-

^ In later life Henry showed a very lively fear of the sweating sickness
— a fear which has exposed him to a charge of cowardice at the hands of
unfavourable historians. If, as seems to be the case, this fear was a some¬
what isolated and unusual feature of his character, it would seem not un¬
reasonable to suppose that its abnormal strength was due to the notion of
a talion punishment — an idea often found in the unconscious levels of the
mind: in other words, that Henry was afraid lest the same sickness which
had unexpectedly swept away his rival (thus gratifying his desires of greatness)
would in turn prove the means of his own undoing.

ON THE CHARACTER AND MARRIED LIFE OF HENRY VIII 29

lance, but even demanded the return of the part already paid,
while Henry VII on his side required the whole of the dowry as
originally contemplated.

While the dispute was still in progress, Henry VII became a
widower and thereupon proposed, as a fresh solution of the problem
that he himself should marry Catherine. Whether this proposal was
an earnest one or not, it was certainly calculated to stir the
Oedipus complex in young Henry’s mind, by bringing him into a
situation of such a kind that he could scarcely but regard him¬
self as in some sense a sexual rival of his father, while at the
same time it was likely to reinforce the transference of the mother-
regarding feelings on to Catherine.

Whatever its ultimate psychological effects may have been, the
proposal was undoubtedly successful as an immediate diplomatic
measure. Ferdinand and Isabella moderated their terms with regard
to the dowry: the marriage of brother and sister-in-law appeared
eminently respectable as compared with the more shocking union
of father and daughter-in-law, and the marriage treaty between
young Henry and Catherine was definitely settled, it being arranged
that the wedding should be celebrated as soon as Henry should
have attained his fourteenth year.

But the death of Isabella shortly afterwards induced Henry VII
to repent of this arrangement. There were various claimants for
the crown of Castile and the whole political situation became for a
time uncertain and obscure. The alliance with Ferdinand lost much
of its attractiveness, a variety of fresh schemes for the marriage
of young Henry were freely discussed and on the eve of his
fifteenth birthday he solemnly repudiated the marriage contract
which he had previously signed.

Three years later however, in spite of various projects, no
further betrothal had been made. Meanwhile Henry VII had reached
the end of his career, and on his deathbed seems to have rever¬
ted to his original plan as regards the younger Henry’s marriage.
The dying king exhorted his son to complete the long projected
and much delayed union with his sister-in-law, and gave at the
same time sundry other pieces of advice, most of which Henry
took well to heart. Indeed there can be but little doubt that a
tendency to follow the repressed wishes of his dead father — a “post¬
poned obedience" of the kind with which psycho-analysts are
familiar formed a by no means unimportant element in Henry’s

1. C. FLtJGEL

character during the earlier years of his reign. Among his other
deathbed wishes Henry VII expressed the desire that his son
should defend the Church, make war upon the Infidel, pay good
heed to his faithful councillors and (perhaps also) that he should
put out of the way Edmund de la Pole, Earl of Suffolk, the
nearest White Rose claimant to the throne. The troubled state of
European politics prevented young Henry from making war on an
extensive scale upon the Turk^, but the other behests he truly
carried out. Henry, throughout his early years (and indeed in some
sense throughout his life) was much concerned to preserve the
true religion and the Institution of the Church ] both by his deeds
and by his written words he fought against all doctrines and ten¬
dencies which he regarded as heretical. So great indeed was his
ardour in this direction that he won from the spiritual head
of Christendom the title of Defender of the Faith a title
borne by his successors to this day. With regard to councillors,
his dependence on their approval and advice (and especially on
that of Wolsey) in the first half of his reign is notorious ; while de
la Pole, imprisoned from the first, was executed four years after¬
wards.

If in these matters Henry obeyed the dying wishes of his father,
he was no less willing to follow the latter’s instructions as regards
marriage, especially perhaps, in this case, because these instructions
coincided with the tendencies emanating from his own unconscious
Oedipus complex; enabling him in this way to combine a
conscious obedience to the behests of filial piety with a reali¬
sation of unconscious desires connected with hostility and jealousy
towards his father and brother. The marriage was indeed hurried for¬
ward with almost indecent haste, being celebrated in a little over
a month after the elder Henry’s death. A few days later the young
couple were crowned King and Queen with much splendour and
ceremony in Westminster Abbey.

Henry having now succeeded to the throne in his eighteenth
year, a variety of circumstances combined to make his position in
some ways an exceptional one in the whole history of English

1 It should be noted however: — 1) that his very first military under¬
taking was of this kind (the expedition of 1611 to co-operate with father-
in-faw Ferdinand against the Moors; 2) that Henry declared that “he
cherished like an heirloom the ardour against the Infidel which he inherited
from his father” (A. F. Pollard, Henry VIII, p. 54).

ON THE CHARACTER AND MARRIED LIFE OF HENRY VIH 31

monarchy. He was the only surviving son of his father and

it was generally recognised that in his person were bound up
all hopes of freedom from internal discord. The Wars of
the Roses were by now sufficiently distant to make the claims
of other possible aspirants to the throne appear unsubstantial
as compared with the firm de facto rights of the Tudor family,
while at the same time the memory of those wars was still

strong enough to make even a tyrannous exercise of royal
power seem preferable to the alternative of civil war or anar¬
chy. Added to these circumstances tending to make Henry’s
power as King more than usually absolute were other factors
of a more personal nature. Henry possessed abilities and qualities
unusual in degree and number and of such a kind as to

make him as a prince intensely popular. All contemporary
authorities agree in describing him as exceptionally handsome,
tall, strong, skilful and talented in arts and letters, with a very
special degree of aptitude for all the manly sports and

exercises of his age. Englishmen of the sixteenth century had in
their way as much affection for a true “sportsman” as those of
the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, and Henry’s popularity
with many of his subjects was, as one historian suggests \ pro¬
bably not less than that which would at the present time fall to
the lot of a young monarch who was a hero of the athletic world,
“the finest oar, the best bat, the crack marksman of his day”.
Henry moreover was very fond of all kind of social festivity and
merriment, delighting in sumptuous display and courtly ceremony
— qualities which, though they eventually led to difficulties through
the extravagance which they engendered, yet appeared at first
a welcome contrast to the somewhat austere and parsimonious
regime of his father.

This combination of happy circumstances may well have
fostered in the young King an undue development of the positive
‘self-regarding” and self-seeking motives, the tendencies calculated
to lead to such development being in his case greater even than
are those to which most youthful rulers are exposed. Nevertheless,
although fully conscious both of the prerogatives due to his
circumstances and station and of his own personal abilities, he
seldom (especially during the early part of hfe reign) became harsh,
overbearing tyrannous, or disrespectful of the advice or opinions

^ Pollard, op. cit. pag. 41.

I. C. FLUGEL

of others. His self-reliance and self-will were happily tem¬
pered by a sound appreciation of the nature and extent of
the forces — psychological and sociological — with which he
had to deal, and by a certain piety and regard for persons
or bodies carrying the weight of constitutional or traditional

authority. , .

Psycho-analysts will be inclined to regard this last characteristic

as a displacement of tendencies and feelings originally directed
to the person of his father. We have already seen some evidence
of this in connection with the carrying out of his father’s deathbed
wishes. Henry’s reliance on his councillors Warham, Wolsey,
Cromwell and others —, his persistent desire to proceed in
accordance with, rather than against, legal and constitutional
authority, his anxiety to gain the approval of, and — later — to
conciliate, the Pope, may all very probably be correctly regarded
as furtlier manifestations of this side of his character a side
which is of great importance for a true appreciation of his
personality, and one which may easily be overlooked on a first
casual view of his career.

These two sets of motives — the egoistic and the venerative
we may perhaps, for the sake of brevity, be allowed to call
them — through their conflicts, interactions and combinations
probably played a very weighty r61e in determining Henry’s
conduct, and through this, of producing many of the outstanding
features — political and domestic — of his reign. We shall have
occasion to refer to them more than once in our examination
of the subsequent events of his life.

To return now to the history of Henry’s married life ; — The
early years with Catherine seem to have been gay and happy.
Only very gradually did Henry become dissatisfied and super¬
stitious as regards the union with his sister-in-law. No doubt a
variety of causes contributed to the eventual rupture, which did
not begin till 1527 — 18 years after the celebration of the
marriage. Catherine, in spite of some excellent qualities, was
tactless, obstinate and narrow-minded, and had not that (real or
apparent) pliability and subservience which Henry, in virtue of his
egoistic tendencies demanded in a consort. Worse than this,
Catherine appears to have suffered from a father-fixation of some
strength, in virtue of which she was unable to transfer adequately
her loyalty and affection from her parents and the land of her

ON THE CHARACTER AND MARRIED LIFE OF HENRY VIII

birth to her husband and the land of her adoption^. For many
years she wrote to her father in the most pious and obedient
terms, and regularly acted as his ambassador and the supporter
of his interests interests that often did not coincide with,
and were sometimes in direct opposition to, those of her husband;

while even in purely English affairs, she sometimes acted in a
manner prejudicial to Henry’s influence and desires.

The most important factor was however, beyond doubt,
Catherine’s inability to produce a male heir to the throne and the
general unfruitfulness of the marriage, which from the point of
view of issue was a long and almost unbroken series of disasters
(due to miscarriages, premature and still births), the only surviving
child being the Princess Mary, born in 1516. Henry’s need of a
legitimate son was a very real one. Without a recognised successor,
the security of the throne and the kingdom was in danger, as there
could be no doubt that in such a case there would arise at Henry’s
death many claimants for tlie supreme power. Henry moreover
was peculiarly sensitive on this point. There can be little doubt
that, like many others, he saw in his heirs a continuation of his
own life and power — an immortalisation of himself, without which
his egoistic impulses could find no complete satisfaction.

Furthermore, ’ this failure in the fertility of his marriage aroused
superstitious fears connected with Henry’s Oedipus complex. The
idea of sterility as a punishment for incest is one that is deeply
rooted in the human mind 2 , and in the case of a union such as tliat
of Henry’s and Catherine’s, there was scriptural authority for the
infliction of a penalty of this description. ^ The scruples of con¬
science which were originally urged as a reason for the delay in
the marriage may have been a mere diplomatic move on the part
of Henry VII, but in the case of the younger Henry in view of
his genuine respect for religion and of the nature of the un¬
conscious feelings he entertained towards his brother, they may

^ It must be said however in Catherine’s defence that the circumstances
of Arthurs early death and of the none too flattering or considerate treatment
that she received in England during the period of her young widowhood
were certainly calculated to produce a regression of feeling in favour of her
own family and home.

* See, for instance, Sir J. G. Frazer, Totemism and Exogamy, vol. IV,
p. 106 ft. ’

’ “If a man shall take his brother’s wife, it is an unclean thing. He hath
uncovered his brother’s nakedness. They shall be childless.” Leviticus XX, 21.

I. C. FLITGEL

well have had some real psychological foundation. Quieted for a
time as the result of his father’s deathbed wishes and Henry’s
own inclinations, these scruples gradually rose again when the
course of events seemed to be bripging the divine prophecy very
near to fulfilment and beyond all reasonable doubt, they constituted
a genuine and all-important factor in Henry’s desire for a divorce
from Catherine. Brewer, as the result of a prolonged study of
contemporary documents, tells us that Henry’s doubts and fears
upon this subject rose slowly in his mind as the result of more
or less unconscious processes. “The exact date at which Henry
began to entertain these scruples and their precise shape at the
first, can never be determined with accuracy j for the most
sufficient of all reasons: they were not known to the king himself
They sprung up unconsciously from a combination of causes,
and took definite form and colour in his breast by insensible
degrees. They must have brooded in his mind some time before
he would acknowledge them to himself^ still less confess them to
others.”* Such gradual growth of feelings of this kind is totally
opposed to the popular view that Henry’s desire to divorce
Catherine was merely an outcome of his sensual longing for Anne
Boleyn, and indicates the operation of more deep lying mental
processes, such as those we have suggested, i. e. the arousal of
fears resting on tlie repression of incestuous desires — desires in
all probability originally connected with his parents (Oedipus
complex), but, through the force of circumstances, transferred to
his brother and sister-in-law.

This is not to say, of course, that Henry’s attachment for Anne
did not also play an important part in his desire to be rid of
Catherine. Probably nothing else but a genuine passion for Anne
would have kept him constant and inflexible during the long and
difficult period of the divorce. Catherine was sbc years older than
Henry, and the mental and physical strain attendant on her long
and unsuccessful series of attempts at childbearing had no doubt
considerably diminished her attractiveness. Before his infatuation
with Anne Boleyn, Henry had enjoyed the favours of two
mistresses : — Elizabeth Blount, by whom he had, so far as we know,
his only illegitimate child — a boy, whom, with the failure of male
heirs, he afterwards thought seriously of raising to the position of
successor to the throne; and Mary Boleyn, sister of Anne Boleyn.

^ Op. cit. vol. II, p. 162.

ON THE CHARACTER AND MARRIED LIFE OF HENRY VIII 35

We know comparatively little of these affairs and the very
existence of the second liaison has been sometimes doubtedL

By psycho-analysts, accustomed as they are to attach importance
to apparently inessential details of this kind, it may not be
considered unworthy of notice that the Christian names of the
two ladies in question are the same as those held by important
members of Henry’s own family — his mother and younger sister
respectively. The suspicion thus raised that the name may have
been of some importance in determining Henry’s choice in these
two cases is strengthened by three further facts, which may be
briefly mentioned here: 1) Henry’s two daughters were also called
by the same two names, viz. Mary and Elizabeth respectively;

2) his only other female favourite, whom we know by name, was
Margaret Shelton, the Christian name being here identical with
Henry’s elder sister (afterwards wife of James V of Scotland);

3) Mary Boleyn’s mother was Lady Elizabeth Boleyn, and there
existed a curious rumour that Henry had indulged in improper
relations with the mother, as well as with the daughter®.

It is true that Henry is reported to have himself denied the
truth of this; but even if (as is very possibly the case) the
rumour itself is exaggerated, it may well have been founded on
some genuine attraction which Henry may have felt for the Lady
Elizabeth. If this is so, in the light of psycho-analytic knowledge,
it would appear not overbold to suggest that the mother and
daughter, Elizabeth and Mary Blount, were, to Henry’s unconscious
mind, substitutes for Elizabeth and Mary Tudor — his mother
and his sister respectively. This would at once constitute additional
evidence in favour of the existence in Henry of incest tendencies
and family fixations and fit in with certain important features of
Henry’s relationship to Anne Boleyn, which are as follows.

One of the most inconsistent facts about the divorce of
Catherine and subsequent marriage with Anne is that, although the
incestuous relationship between Henry and Catherine was made
the sole and all-important ground for claiming the divorce, the
immediately succeeding second marriage involved the consummation
of a relationship extremely similar to that which was supposed

* Though the proofs of its existence seem quite adequate. See Paul
Friedmann, Anne Boleyn, vol. II, Appendix B.

2 Brewer, Letters and Papers, IV, CCCXXIX, footnote; also Reign of
Henry VIII, vol. II, p. 170; Friedmann, op. cit. vol. II, p. 326.

3 *

I. C. FLUGEL

to invalidate the first. Catherine was Henry’s sister in virtue of
her previous marriage with his brother Arthur: Anne was his
sister in virtue of his own (illicit) relationship to her sister Mary.
He was therefore only giving up one sister in order to take on
another ; and the very same (papal) powers that had to be invoked
to grant the dissolution of the first marriage on the ground of
incest had to be approached with a view to granting a dispensation
because of the incestuous nature of the second union. Viewed in
the light of sound diplomacy or of reasonable moral sense, the
inconsistency involved in this procedure is absurdly evident. It
cannot in fact be accounted for on either of these planes of
thought. Such inconsistency however is quite a characteristic
feature of conduct determined — partly or wholly — by un¬
conscious complexes, and as such, probably, it has to be regarded
and explained.

It is not necessary here to enter into the long and tedious
history of the proceedings for divorce, which extended over a
period of six years, from 1527 to 1533. These proceedings derive
their great historical importance from the fact that they were the
occasion of the breach with Rome (the breach that opened the
way to the Reformation in England). Their importance for the
development of Henry’s mind and character is due to a similar
reason. The main original difficulty in the granting of the divorce
(apart from the very strong popular feeling in England in favour
of Catherine) was due to the following facts: — first, it involved
the annulling of the previous papal dispensation — a procedure
which might seem liable to bring future papal dispensations (and
indeed the papal power generally) into disrepute; secondly and
chiefly, the Pope was at that time in the power of Charles V,
who, both for political and family reasons — he was of course
Catherine’s nephew — was opposed to the divorce.

The Pope being thus, by the force of circumstances, brought
into opposition with Henry’s policy and unable to grant the
divorce, as he had done recently in the case of other highly
placed persons (notably in the case of Louis XII before he married
Henry’s sister Mary, in that of Brandon, Duke of Sulfollc, previous
to his marriage to the same sister after Louis’s death and in that
of Henry’s other sister Margaret — cases which were certainly in
Henry’s mind as precedents), obstacles of one kind or another
were continually placed in the way of Henry’s desire. The con-

ON THE CHARACTER AND MARRIED LIFE OF HENRY VIII 37

sequent long delay in the realisation of his wishes brought up in
Henry’s mind a conflict between the two aspects of his character
to which we have previously referred — the egoistic and
venerative aspects — with results of great importance, both for his
future married life and his career in general. In virtue probably
of the feelings of love and respect which he held towards his
father, Henry was in his early years most anxious to win and
retain the approval of the Pope^. He had ever been willing to
defend the Pope and the Church in word and deed, both against
armed force and spiritual heresy, in fact “his championship of the
Holy See had been the most unselfish part of Henry’s policy”^;
and there was no doubt that he was most anxious to obtain the
quasi-paternal sanction of the divorce and remarriage which a
papal edict would aflbrd.

But as time passed, and the inability to obtain the fulfilment
of his desires with the Pope’s consent and approval became more
and more apparent, Henry’s egoistic motives began to gain the
mastery and to overwhelm the venerative tendencies, which had
hitherto formed such an important element in his character. So
far indeed did the former motives eventually prevail that Henry
ultimately brought himself not only to arrange for the divorce to
be carried out at home without the Pope’s authority, to defy at
once the Pope, the Emperor and his own people and to brave
the terrors of the papal excommunication, but even to set himself
in the Pope’s place by becoming the head of the Church in
England and to assume a power, temporal and spiritual, which
has never perhaps been equalled by any other British sovereign.
This splendid triumph of self-assertion, in the face of severe
obstacles3 can only have been achieved by a very complete victory
of the egoistic over the venerative tendencies. That such a victory

^ The Pope of course, as his very title signifies, is one of the most
regular and normal father substitutes.

2 Pollard, op. cit. p. 107.

2 Cp. the words of Pollard, op. cit. p. 306. ”It was the King and the
King alone, who kept England on the course which he had mapped out. Pope
and Emperor were defied ; Europe was shocked ; Francis himself disapproved
of the breach with the Church; Ireland was in revolt; Scotland, as ever, was
hostile ; legislation had been thrust down the throats of a recalcitrant Church,
and, we are asked to believe, of a no less unwilling House of Commons,
while the people at large were seething with indignation at the insults heaped
upon the injured Queen and her daughter.”

I. C. FLUGEL

took place is indicated by Henry’s contempt of the power which
he had formerly exalted, as when he said that “if the Pope issued
ten thousand excommunications, he would not care a straw for
them,” that “he would show the Princes how small was really
the power of the Pope” and “that when the Pope had done what
he liked on his side, he (Henry) would do what he liked here .
In such an attitude of defiance psycho-analysts will immediately
recognize a displacement of the desire to overthrow the rule of
the father and usurp his authority — a desire based on the primi¬
tive Oedipus complex.

From the time of his split with Rome, Henry’s character
underwent a marked transformation. He became vastly more
despotic, determined to rule as well as to reign; more intolerant
of any kind of limitation of his power, and dependent on his
own decisions in all matters, great and small, instead of sub¬
mitting to the advice of councillors, as he had hitherto so

largely done.

The most significant and important step in this last direction
was of course that which brought about the fall of Wolsey. It
is fairly certain that, in the day of his power, Wolsey too was
regarded by Henry with feelings originally connected with his
father-venerative tendencies. These feelings may have flowed more
freely and more consistently on to Wolsey’s person because, as
Friedmann well suggests^, Wolsey, as an ecclesiastic, was not

brought into such direct competition with Henry’s claims to

manly qualities, as a layman would have been. The fields of war,
sport and sex were, for instance, excluded, and the sphere of
politics, in which Wolsey so excelled was one in which Henry
only gradually began to take a lively interest. However, when
this interest reached a certain degree of intensity, as it did under
the stimulus of the proceedings for divorce, Henry became in¬
tolerant of Wolsey’s guidance, with the inevitable result of

Wolsey’s fall.*

* Op. cit. vol. I, p. 34.

* Though other important influences were also of course at work,
notably : — 1) Wolsey’s connection with the Church; 2) the well-founded
suspicion that Wolsey was not too favourably disposed to the projected
marriage with Anne Boleyn, Wolsey thus becoming an obstacle to the con¬
summation of Henry’s sexual desires, and in this way bringing upon himself
the hostile elements of Henry’s Oedipus complex.

ON THE CHARACTER AND MARRIED LIFE OF HENRY VIII 39

After Wolsey’s fall none other attained his unique position ;
even Cromwell, in the height of his power, occupying a far inferior
place. As regards religion too, Henry moved on a consistent road
to power. In creating himself head of the Church, he not only
took unto himself the paternal authority of the Pope, but became
to some extend a sharer of the divine power of which the Pope
had been tlie earthly representative. As Luther declared “Junker
Henry meant to be God, and to do as pleased himself”^.

This identification of himself with God — the Gottmensch-
komplex, as Ernest Jones has called it^ — found further expression
in his breaking up of the monasteries, his prohibitions against the
worship of saints and images, the consistent exclusion of clerics
from the higher posts of state which they had hitherto occupied
and the endeavours to define the orthodox faith and produce —
by force if necessary — a general uniformity of religious belief
within his dominions; all measures tending to prevent the
possibility of opposition or rivalry to his^ quasi — omnipotent
power in the religious sphere.

Throughout all this magnificent triumph of the egoistic ten¬
dencies, Henry steered his course with a level head. His success
in the face ot circumstances which would have been the un¬
doing of most other monarchs was due partly to the unique

conditions of his time, which, as we have seen, made possible
and even agreeable a degree of despotism which at other periods
would have been resented; partly, to the exceeding strength of
will and self-reliance that Henry developed after the overthrow of
the father-regarding venerative attitude, in the course of his struggle
with the Pope; partly too, to his firm grasp of reality in the field

of politics. Few men have been able to reconcile, as he did, an

In his later dealings with Wolsey and with Warham, Archbishop of
Canterbury, Henry would seem sometimes to have had in mind a comparison
between his own relations to the Cardinal and the Archbishop and those of
his predecessor, Henry II, to Thomas a Becket (e. g. Pollard, op. cit. p. 271).
It is noteworthy in this connection that, whereas during the early part of
his career, Henry was in the habit of showing his respect for the murdered
archbishop by making a yearly offering at his shrine, in 1538 he added to
his offences against the Church by despoiling the same shrine and burning
the saintly bones, and is even said to have held a mock trial of the saint,
who was condemned as a traitor,

‘ Letters and Papers, XVI, 106.

2 Der Gottmenschkomplex, ZeitsSriftfur drztficBe Ps^<£oanaf^se, I, p. 313.

1. C. FLtiGEL

intense egotism and an enormous lust for power with an undistorted
vision of forces and events; and in the unique degree to which
he achieved this combination is probably to be sought the secret
of his political success.

The divorce of Catherine, which had provided the occasion for
this gradual but momentous change in Henry’s character, was
after many delays and vicissitudes, eventually hurried forward to
a rapid conclusion by the fact of Anne having become pregnant
and the consequent necessity of legalising her relationship to
Henry, if her child (supposing it should be a son) was to become
the recognised heir to the throne. In spite of Henry’s long
infatuation for Anne, he had not succeeded in making her his
mistress till towards the end of 1532. Warned perhaps by the
somewhat fickle nature of Henry’s affection for his previous
mistresses, Anne determined to avoid the consummation of her
intimacy with the King, and kept her resolution until the success
of the divorce seemed certain.

Subsequent events amply demonstrated the wisdom of her conduct.
She was married to Henry in January, 1533, and in the following
May Henry was already beginning to grow tired of her. Though
steadfast in his affections for years in the face of difficulties, as
soon as all obstacles were removed and he had full and un¬
questioned possession of her whom he had so long desired,
Henry’s love began to cool and he became conscious of defects
in Anne of which he had previously been unobservant. Here we
see clearly for the first time the manifestation of what seems to
have been a very important trait of Henry’s sexual life, viz. that
there was usually some impediment in the way of the free ex¬
pression of his love towards the women of his choice. In Anne’s
case the impediment lay doubtless to some extent in her refusal
to give herself up fully to her royal lover, until she became
certain that she would be his consort rather than his mistress,
But there were deeper underlying factors connected with the very
circumstance of the love having been previously illicit — a
circumstance which gave it an attraction that a legalised union
failed to possess.

In an illuminating paper on the varieties of the love life^
Freud has shown that the need for an obstacle to be present as
‘ Beitrage zur Psychologic des Liebeslebens, JaBrBuS fur psycBoanafytisSe
undpsycBopatBoCogiscBe TorsSungetti II, 1910, p. 389.

ON THE CHARACTER AND MARRIED LIFE OF HENRY VIII 41

a condition for the arousal of love can be traced back to the
operation of the Oedipus complex. In the earliest love of a boy
to his mother such an obstacle is constituted by the incestuous
nature of the relationship, which, because of this nature, is a
forbidden one. Furthermore, the mother, as the object of the
boy’s love, is already bound by ties of law and affection to a
third person, the father. In a number of cases where the psycho-
sexual development has not been carried far enough to ensure
adequate freedom from the infantile fixation on the parents, the
continued existence of the Oedipus complex manifests itself in
the choice of a love-object, between whom and the lover there
is an impediment of the kind that existed in the original in¬
cestuous love; i. e. either the love itself is unlawful or the loved
object is already bound elsewhere, or else (as often happens)
both conditions are present. Now there can be little doubt that
Henry was a person whose Oedipus complex found expression in
such a way. On this hypothesis it becomes possible to explain
two very constant features of his love life; his fickleness (which
tended to make him unable to love a woman, once his possession
of her was assured) and the desire for some obstacle between
him and the object of his choice. We shall come across sufficient
examples of these, as we study the further course of his chequered
conjugal career.

The facts connected with the fall of Anne Boleyn show more
clearly than any other event not only the existence of a desire
for an impediment of this kind, but the foundation of this desire
in an incestuous fixation. At the same time they give the key to
a true understanding of the central conflict involved in Henry’s
sexual life — that “common cause” of Henry’s matrimonial diffi¬
culties, which, as Froude says, “ought to be discoverable”. Henry
as we saw, soon tired of Anne after his marriage with her. The
fact that her child, born in 1533, was a daughter (the future
Queen Elizabeth), instead of the long desired male heir, only
served still further to alienate Henry’s affections. During the three
years of his married life with Anne, Henry consoled himself, first
with some lady whose name does not seem to have come down
to us, then with Margaret Shelton, and finally with Jane Seymour,
his future wife, who appears to have aroused his genuine love.
The thought of putting Anne aside seems to have been present
for some considerable period before it was put into execution.

1. C. FLUGEL

matters being delayed for a time by the fact that a repudiation
of Anne might have necessitated a return to Catherine.

Catherine’s death in January 1536 (hurried on, as some think,
by means of poison) removed this difficulty, and Anne’s mis¬
carriage (probably her second) in the same month served to revive
the scruples with regard to incest that Henry had already ex¬
perienced in relation to his first marriage. These scruples, which
on their first arousal had grown slowly and by insensible degrees,
now quickly regained their mastery over Henry’s mind. The union
with his second sister-representative (Anne) was now as repellent
to him, on account of its incestuous flavour, as had been that
with his first sister-representative (Catherine). Anne was accused
of having been unfaithful to her husband, quite a number oi
persons being charged as her accomplices, and of having been
repeatedly guilty of incest with her brother. Lord Rochford. She
was further accused of having conspired with her lovers to bring
about the death of the King and of having, through her treasonable
behaviour, so injured his health as to put his life in danger. All
the more important male prisoners concerned in these charges were
found guilty of high treason and were put to death, Anne herself
following them to the scaffold a few days later.

At the same time her marriage with Henry was declared
invalid, probably on one or more of the following grounds —
1) the existence of an alleged precontract with the Earl of
Northumberland; 2) the affinity between Anne and Henry arising
from the latter’s relations with Mary Boleyn. The very day after
Anne’s death, Henry was married to Jane Seymour.

Historians are pretty generally agreed that (although Anne was
far from being incapable of loose living or even of more serious
offences) there was as a matter of fact little or no truth in
any of the long series of grave charges brought against her. In
particular there seems to be no satisfactory evidence at all in
favour of the charges of incest and of treason. We are therefore
free to regard these accusations as for the most part reflections
of Henry’s own mental state, for although Cromwell and others
were responsible for the details of the matter, “Henry was regularly
informed of every step taken against Anne and her associates
and interfered a good deal with the proceedings”, and “his wishes
probably influenced the form in which the indictments were drawn

1 See Pollard, op. cit. p. 344.

ON THE CHARACTER AND MARRIED LIFE OF HENRY VIII 43

up”^. His interest in the proceedings and their psychological signi¬
ficance for him is further shown by the fact that he composed a
tragedy on the subject, which he showed to the Bishop of Carlisle
at a gay supper very shortly after Anne’s execution^.

In accusing Anne of incest with her brother, Henry produced
with reference to his brother-in-law a repetition of the situation
which had formerly existed as between himself and his own
brother in the case of Catherine. In both cases he was (in reality
oJ in imagination) brought into competition with his brother over
the person of his sister. The circumstances under which he had
first been brought, as it were, into rivalry with his brother Arthur
(calculated, as these were, to arouse in a slightly altered form
the original Oedipus complex)* had, it would appear, made so firm
an impression on his psycho-sexual tendencies and dispositions,
that he continued to desire a repetition of the situation under
which his sexual impulses had first been aroused.

But the feelings called forth by his relations to Arthur and
Catherine were ambivalent in character, as is almost invariably
the case with those connected with the Oedipus complex and its
displacements. On the one hand there was the desire to kill his
brother (father substitute) and marry his sister (mother substitute)
while at the same time there was also present a horror of these
things. At the time of Catherine’s divorce, it was of course the
horror that was uppermost in Henry’s conscious mind \ but at
the same time the attractiveness of incest manifested itself in the
choice of a fresh sister substitute in the person of Anne; giving
rise to that strange contradiction in Henry’s behaviour of which
we have already spoken. After a time (shortened, it would appear,
by Anne’s miscarriages, which aroused Henry’s previous super¬
stitions) the negative attitude to incest was transferred in turn to
his relations with Anne. In the hatred of Anne which was thus
occasioned Henry projected on to her his own incestuous desires;

^ Friedmann, op. cit. vol. II, p. 268.

* Friedmann, op. cit. vol. II, p. 267.

* It must not be forgotten that the facts of his parents being within the
forbidden degrees of affinity and of their requiring a papal dispensation, just
as he himself did later on, were doubtless known to Henry and thus pro¬
bably constituted a strong associative link between his parents’ marriage and
his own union with Catherine ; another link being formed probably by his
father’s proposal to marry Catherine after Arthur’s death.

I. C. FLUGEL

i. e. she was accused of incestuous relations with her brother,
whereas the real fact was that Henry himself desired incestuous
relations with his sister. In this way Henry was able to enjoy by
proxy the fulfilment of his own repressed desires, while at the
same time giving expression to his horror and disgust at the
relationship concerned.

By the same means too he was able to provide an outlet
for the jealousy, fear and hatred he felt towards his brother. Just
as Henry himself had, through the accident of Arthur’s death,
inherited the throne in place of his brother, so now he seems to
have feared that his own place in turn would be usurped by a
brother. Hence the charge of treason, for which there seems to be
even less evidence than for the supposed sexual offences, and which
therefore, to the psycho-analyst, reveals clearly enough the
circumstance that, although Henry was not in fact guilty of
Arthur’s death, he nevertheless felt guilty on the subject, since
the death constituted a realisation of his own repressed desires^.

By a process familiar to the student of unconscious mental
life, the brother role seems to have been filled in Henry’s phantasy
by more than one person at this time. The sexual aspects of the
part were of course taken principally (but not entirely) by Anne’s
brother, Rochford ; but the accusations of treason were directed
more especially against one, Henry Noreys, who was supposed
to have arranged to many Anne after Henry’s death. Noreys
appears to have been the only one of the accused whom Henry
honoured with a personal interview on the subject of his misdemeanours
and whom he privately urged to confession^. Now it is suggestive
that shortly before this incident Noreys has acquired a quasi¬
personal relationship to Henry by becoming betrothed to Margaret
Shelton, who had quite recently been Henry’s favourite and
probably his mistress. In view of the fact that much emphasis was
laid on Anne’s becoming a sister of Henry’s in virtue of his
relations to Mary Boleyn, it would seem not unlikely that, by a
similar process of thought, Noreys might be regarded as Henry’s
brother in virtue of his betrothal to Margaret. If any such process
did take place in Henry’s mind, the reason for the special charges

^ Here again the brother enmity was probably only a displacement of
the earlier father enmity, for, as we have seen above, Henry had in some
respects, special grounds for imagining himself in his father’s place.

* Friedmann, op. cit. vol. IT, p. 251.

ON THE CHARACTER AND MARRIED LIFE OF HENRY yill 45

against Noreys and the special attention paid to him by Henry
,is to a great extent explained

In order to prevent the recurrence ot such schemes as had
b^en attributed to Anne and Noreys, Henry had resort to legis¬
lation. By a clause in the Act of Succession (an act passed
primarily to declare Anne’s daughter Elizabeth a bastard and to
settle the crown on Henry’s prospective issue by Jane) it was
made high treason for anyone to marry a King’s daughter, sister
or aunt without royal permission — a measure by which Henry
would appear to have made an endeavour to do away for ever
with the fear of sexual rivals in his own family.

We have seen how, during the divorce of Catherine, while the
negative (horror) aspect of the incest complex was in the ascendant
towards Catherine herself, the positive (love) aspects were at the
same time active in respect of Anne, so that, while Henry was
getting rid of an incestuous relation with one sister, he was
actually engaged in starting a fresh relation of the same kind
with another sister. A very similar state of affairs seems to have
arisen just before the fall of Anne. Undeterred by the result of
his two preceding incestuous adventures, Henry was again con¬
templating marriage with a woman who was within the forbidden
degrees of blood relationship. Jane Seymour “was descended on
her mother’s side from Edward III, and Cranmer had to dispense
with a canonical bar to the marriage arising from her consanguinity
to the King in the third and fourth degrees”*. Although the actual
relationship between Henry and Jane was thus relatively remote,
it is probable that Henry’s fancy saw in Jane a relative of a
nearer kind; for, shortly before their marriage, he was in the
habit of meeting her in the rooms ot her brother, Sir Edward
Seymour, whom he thus made as it were, a participant in the
affair* — in this way endeavouring once more to re-establish the
original brother-sister triangle^.

* It is just possible too that, as perhaps in other cases, the name Henry
may have been of some importance, referring of course to the Oedipus
complex in its original (parent-regarding) form.

* Pollard, op. cit. p. 346.

* And who, it appears, had moved into these rooms (to which Henry
had access by a secret pass^e) expressly for this purpose, the rooms
having been previously occupied by Cromwell.

* Friedmann, op. cit. vol. II, p. 222.

1. C. FLtJGEL

The circumstances connected with the fall of Anne Boleyn
thus afford very clear evidence of two leading tendencies in
Henry’s psycho-sexual life — both of them being conditioned by
the facts of Henry’s early love experiences, and through them by
the still earlier Oedipus complex. These tendencies are: — 1) the
desire for (and hatred of) a sexual rival; 2) the attraction towards
(and at the same time the horror of) an incestuous relationship.

The same period gives us the first unmistakable indications of a
third tendency (one intimately connected with the other two)
which was henceforward to be of great importance, viz. Henry’s
insistence on chastity in his consort. We have already seen that
his passion lor Anne Boleyn seemed to be maintained in its
original strength over a considerable number of years, to some
extent at least because she refused to allow Henry the intimate
privileges of her person. The same means were employed with
equal effect by her successor Jane Seymour in the early days of
her intimacy with Henry. So great was her assumption of virtue
that she even refused presents from the king, because of their
possible implication — a course which called forth much approval
and admiration from Henry himself. While she thus made great
show of chastity to Henry, there is reason to believe that she
was not always as careful of her honour as she professed to be.
Indeed some of Henry’s contemporaries seem to have taken the
view that Henry was more or less wilfully shutting his eyes to
certain (probably well known) facts in Jane’s past history, facts of
which he might afterwards become well aware, should it suit
his purpose. Thus Chapuys, the ambassador of Charles V and
a friend of Jane’s, says in a letter written in May 1536: “She
(Jane) is a little over 25. You may imagine whether, being an
Englishwoman, and having been so long at court, she would not
hold it a sin to be still a maid. At which the king will perhaps
be rather pleased ... for he may marry her on condition that
she is a virgin, and when he wants a divorce he will find plenty
of witnesses to the contrary”^.

In the light both of psychological knowledge and ot later
events (particularly those connected with Catherine Howard), it is
probable that the inconsistency here involved was not altogether
wilful or deliberate. It is more likely that we have to do with
the manifestations of a conflict in Henry’s mind — a conflict

^ Quoted in Friedmann, op. cit. vol. II, p. 200.

ON THE CHARACTER AND MARRIED LIFE OF HENRY Vm 47

similar to tliose connected with the desire for a sexual rival
and for an incestuous relationship, and leading, as in their case,
to an inconsistent, fluctuating and ambivalent attitude. In fact
there would appear to have existed two opposing motives ; in
virtue of the first of which Henry desired the most scrupulous
chastity on the part of his wives, while at the same time, in
virtue of the second, he secretly (and probably unconsciously)
delighted in a partner who had already enjoyed sexual experience
with other men, or who was actually unfaithful after marriage.

The explanation of this attitude is to be found, as before, in
the facts connected with the Oedipus complexi. To the young boy
the idea of sexual relations between the parents is apt to be a
veiy disagreeable one. Jealousy of the father, the necessity of
dissociating the parents from sexual thoughts (in order to sur¬
mount the stage of incestuous fixation) and a number of other
potent factors, into which it is unnecessary to enter here, fre¬
quently give rise to the phantasy that no sexual relations exist or
have existed between the parents — a phantasy that finds its supreme
expression in the notion of the Virgin Mother and the Virgin
Birth which plays such a prominent part in Religion, Myth and
Legend. Now since, in later life, the wife is often unconsciously
identified with the mother, it is not surprising that the ideas
concerning chastity, originally aroused in connection with the latter
should be displaced on to the former: hence, in large measure
the attraction which virginity exercises over many men.

On the other hand, the boy may soon discover or suspect the
occurrence of sexual relations between his parents ; and the having
of such relations (in the past or in the present) may come to be
regarded as an essential characteristic of the mother ; and therefore
any substitute for her in later life may be expected to exhibit
the same characteristic, so that, in so far as the wife represents
a mother surrogate, only women who have already enjoyed sexual
experience are eligible for the position: hence, to some extent
the fascination of widows 2 .

Now it would seem probable that in Henry’s unconscious mind

^ Cp. Freud, op. cit.

* By a further peculiar mental process, the mother will not infrequently
come to be regarded as a prostitute, or at least as one who is very free
with her favours. (Cp. Freud, op. cit.) Such an extension of the phantasy may
very well have taken place in Henry’s case, and would help to account for

I. C. FLtGEL

both these (mutually incompatible) notions of the mother had found
a place, and that in the conflict between them we have the key
to the inconsistency of his conduct in this respect*.

Having now arrived at a definite conception of the nature ot
the chief unconscious mental factors wich were operative in
Henry’s married life, we may content ourselves with a rapid
examination of their influence on the remaining part of his career.
His union with Jane Seymour was not destined to be of long
duration. Jane died in October 1537, one year and four months
after her marriage, and a few days after she had given birth to
a son (afterwards Edward VI). Henry seems to have had through¬
out some genuine attachment to her, and she and Catherine Parr
share the honour of being the only two of Henry’s six wives
who completed their conjugal career without a rupture. Possibly
the brevity of this career in Jane’s case may have prevented the
occurrence of an alienation of Henry’s affections such as Chapuys
had anticipated (in the letter quoted above). Furthermore the fact
that she had presented him with the long wished for male heir
probably added considerably to the warmth of Henry’s feelings
towards her. At any rate Henry seems to have cherished her
memory for some considerable time, and at his own death, ten
years after Jane’s, accorded her the signal honour of being laid to
rest in her tomb at Windsor.

During the period between Jane’s death and Henry’s eventual
marriage '’with Anne of Cleves, his fourth wife, in 1539, various
projects of marriage were discussed, none of which were destined
to come to fruition, but in which the workings of Henry’s un¬
conscious tendencies can stUl to some extent be traced. The most
important of these projects was connected with Mary, Duchess of

the numerous accusations of infidelity in the case of Anne Boleyn (only one
of the accused men subsequently pleaded guilty and even the fact of his
guilt has been doubted) and for the overlooking for so long a time of the
rather openly promiscuous life led by Catherine Ho wardboth before and after
marriage. Cp. below p.

1 To the existence of these notions in Henry’s mind was probably due
much of the importance that was attached (during the divorce proceedings
against Catherine of Aragon) to the question as to whether Catherine’s
marriage with Arthur had or had not been consummated. Catherine herself
stated at a comparatively late stage of the proceedings that there had been
no consummation, and in so doing she may have hoped to touch Henry at a
point on which she knew him to be sensitive.

ON THE CHARACTER AND MARRIED LIFE OF HENRY VIII

Longueville, better known as Mary ol Guise. Mary was already
affianced to Henry's nephew, James V of Scotland, (the desire for
a rival and the tendency to incest — cp. too the name in this con¬
nection both therefore being manifested in this case); but
Henry insisted that the importance of his own proposal ought to
outweigh that of the previous arrangement. Francis I refused how¬
ever to offend his ally James by acceding to Henry’s demand,
and proposed as a substitute Mary of Bourbon, daughter of the
Duke of Venddme. Henry however rejected her forthwith, on
hearing that her hand had already been refused by James (ab¬
sence of attraction where there is no rivalry); the two younger
sisters of Mary of Guise were then suggested, together with a
number of other ladies at the French court; and Henry, growing
impatient and irritated, demanded that a selection of the hand¬
somest available beauties should be sent to Calais for his personal
inspection and eventual choice. Francis however rebelled against
this scheme for “trotting out the young ladies like hackneys”, and
the whole idea of a French marriage was thereupon abandoned.

Meanwhile negotiations of a similar kind had been started in
the Netherlands. The lady here selected was Christina, daughter
of the deposed king of Denmark. Christina had been married at
a very early age to the JDuke of Milan and after a brief married
life was now a widow of sixteen — circumstances that recall
vividly those of Catherine of Aragon after Arthur’s death. For
political reasons however the match was not concluded and Henry
was still without a wife.

Francis I and Charles V were at this time united in friendship
and their alliance made Henry look for support elsewhere, as a
means of counterbalancing their power. The Protestant princes of
Germany suggested themselves for this purpose. Religious diffi¬
culties for some time barred the way, but in the person of the
Duke of Cleves Henry encountered one whose policy was a com¬
promise between Protestantism and Romanism rather similar to
that which he himself adopted*. A match between Henry and
Anne, the daughter of the Duke, was arranged, largely through
Cromwell’s influence, though an obstacle was present in the fact
that Anne had been already promised to the son of the Duke of
Lorraine. Though this fact may, here as elsewhere, have been an
attraction to Henry, he seems on the whole to have behaved with
^ Cp. Pollard op. cit. p. 383.

I. C. FLtGEL

remarkable . passivity as regards the marriage. But a short time
before, he had said with reference to his contemplated French
marriage, “I trust to no one but myself. The thing touches me too
near. I wish to see them and know them some time before decid¬
ing”. Now however he agreed to accept Anne on no better assur¬
ances than Cromwell’s praises of her beauty and Holbein’s none too
flattering portrait. Perhaps he was willing to put an end at any
cost to the worries of wife-hunting ; perhaps too he was genuinely
alarmed at the threatening political situation, for the Pope, the
Emperor, and the Kings of France and Scotland were all arrayed
against him and an invasion of England seemed not unlikely.
Whatever the reason, he was very pliable in Cromwell’s hands
and even after he had seen and disapproved of Anne (whose
appearance was homely, whose accomplishments were small when
judged by the standard of the English and French courts and
who could speak no language but her own), he nevertheless con¬
sented to proceed with the marriage, distasteful as it was to him.

It was destined however to be the shortest of all his matri¬
monial ventures. In a few months the political situation had
changed. Henry no longer needed the Protestant alliance, and lost
no time in freeing himself from the manage de convenance which
had been entered into with that end in view. In the summer ol
1540 Cromwell, who had engineered the match and the alliance
was arrested and beheaded; whUe at the same time Henry’s marriage
with Anne was declared null and void, Henry pleading that he
had not been a free agent in the matter, that Anne had never
been released from her contract with the son of the Duke of
Lorraine, that he (Henry) had only gone through the ceremony
on the assumption that a release would be forthcoming and that
consequently, actuated by^a conscientious scruple, he had refrained
from consummating the marriage.

Superficial as these reasons may well seem (for there is no
doubt that Henry really wished to dissolve the match because
Anne was unattractive to him — of which fact indeed he made
no secret — and because the alliance for which the marriage stood
was no longer necessary), it will be observed that they never¬
theless bear unmistakable traces of Henry’s unconscious ten¬
dencies, showing that these tendencies were active in this case also*.

‘ Henry had previously complained to Cromwell that he suspected Anne
(groundlessly, so far as we kow) of being “no true maid” — thus showing

ON THE CHARACTER AND MARRIED LIFE OF HENRY VIH 51

Anne of Cleves being thus put out of the way, Henry immed¬
iately entered into a fifth marriage, with a lady to whose charms
he had already fallen a victim — Catherine Howard, a niece ol
the Duke of Norfolk. For about a year and a half Henry lived
with his new bride more happily perhaps than with any other of
his consorts. He congratulated himself that “after sundry troubles
of mind which had happened to him by marriage” he had at last
found a blissful solution of his matrimonial difficulties; and in his
chapel he returned solemn thanks to Heaven for the felicity which
his conjugal state afforded him, directing his confessor, the Bishop
of Lincoln, to compose a special form of prayer for that purpose-

This spell of happiness however was built on a delusion
Catherine Howard had lived anything but a chaste life before her
marriage, though the king seems to have closed his eyes to the
fact, as he had probably done before on a similar occasion. Hven
after her marriage, Catherine continued to receive her former lovers,
particularly one Culpepper, to whom she had been previously
affianced. Reports of the Queen’s misconduct reached the ears of
Cranmer who with much trepidation brought the facts to Henry’s
knowledge. The latter at first refused to believe the charges, but
on the evidence becoming too strong to be resisted, was over¬
whelmed with surprise, grief, shame and anger, wept bitterly in
public and generally manifested such emotion that “it was thought
he had gone mad”. He at first contemplated granting Catherine
a pardon, but on further proofs of quite recent misdemeanours
coming to light, she was executed, together with her lovers and all
those who had been her accomplices in one way or another.

We have here another very clear example of the working of
Henry s unconscious complexes. Bearing in mind the great import¬
ance which he was wont to attach to virginity and chastity,
together with the marked dissoluteness of Catherine’s life and the
comparatively little care she took to conceal it, it would seem that
Henry was guilty of an almost pathological blindness in remaining
ignorant of the true circumstances for so long. That there was
indeed some definite repression at work is indicated too by his
inability or unwillingness to believe the facts when they were first
brought to his notice, and by his very great emotion on finally
realising the truth.

the operation of the chastity complex as well as that connected with the
presence of a rival.

4 *

1. C. FLtJGEL

The mental forces here'at work are of course those with which
we are already familiar. On the one hand, Henry, as we have
seen, desired a woman who had other lovers besides himself, while
on the other hand he ardently desired her exclusive possession
and her chastity. The conflict between these incompatible longings
produced a temporary dissociation. For a time Henry was able to
enjoy Catherine as if her dissoluteness and her infidelity did not
exist — his enjoyment being indeed probably heightened by the
very fact of her loose living, though the knowledge of this loose
living was excluded from his conscious mind. When this know¬
ledge did at length enter consciousness, he was overcome by his
feelings, in much the same way as the bringing to light of un¬
conscious factors in the course of psycho-analysis will often give
rise to an emotional crisis^.

As he had done after the fall of Anne Boleyn, so now also,
Henry resorted to legislative measures to prevent a recurrence of
the disaster that had befallen him. On the previous occasion it
had been made high treason to marry any woman nearly related
to the King without the King’s consent. The present enactments
were primarily directed against female, rather than against male,
offenders (following perhaps a development of Henry’s mind, in
virtue of which the chastity motif had been for some time increas¬
ing in importance), and it was declared treason for any woman
to marry the King, if her previous life had not been strictly virtuous.

The new measure seems to have aroused considerable interest
and amusement both in court and country, for the long series of
Henry’s matrimonial misadventures had now assumed to his con¬
temporaries much the same laughable and yet tragic aspect which
they still possess for us. In view of the strictness of the qualifi¬
cations now required for the post of Queen, Chapuys suggested
that “few, if any, ladies now at court will henceforth aspire to such

* The emotion itself was probably complex both in nature and origin.
From the accounts we have of his conduct, we may surmise that there were
present, among other constituents: — 1) grief, at the breakdown of his delu¬
sion — his happy life with Catherine being brought to a sudden and disa¬
strous end; 2) shame, both because he dimly realised that in the past his
enjoyment had been largely due to gratification of forbidden desires (con¬
nected with the Oedipus complex) and because he had been made to look
foolish before others; 3) anger, directed both against Catherine and her
accomplices for having deceived him and against himself for having allowed
himself to be deceived.

ON THE CHARACTER AND MARRIED LIFE OF HENRY VIII 53

an honour’ll; while Henry’s subjects, with a true appreciation both ot
his psychological needs and of the course of action to which
these needs would impel him, jokingly remarked that only a
widow would be able to meet the king’s demands, as no reputed
maid would ever be persuaded to incur the penalty of the statute*.

So indeed it actually turned out. In the early summer of 1543
Henry married Catherine Parr, his sixth and last wife. Although only
31 years of age, Catherine was then in her second widowhood —
her second husband Lord Latimer having died at the end of 1542.
In thus espousing one the fact of whose widowhood was especially
striking, Henry was adopting the best compromise between his
own conflicting tendencies and emotions. Catherine was chaste
(her moral character was beyond reproach) and yet she had un¬
doubtedly enjoyed previous sexual experience — a circumstance
which, as we have seen, was necessary for the gratification of Henry’s
unconscious desires. At the same time another circumstance con¬
nected with Catherine Parr enabled Henry to satisfy to a large
extent his other complexes. After the death of her second hus¬
band, Catherine’s hand was sought by Sir Thomas Seymour,
Henrys brother-in-law (younger brother of Jane Seymour) to whom
she appears to have been sincerely attached (and whom she
eventually married after Henry’s death — thus being, as Pollard
says, “almost as much married as Henry himself”). Henry however
overruled the engagement — in much the same way as he had
attempted to do in the case of Mary of Guise — and compelled
Catherine to abandon her lover in favour of himself.

The circumstances of Henry’s last marriage thus strongly recall
those connected with his first. The name of his bride was the
same in both cases*, and in both cases he took the place which
would otherwise have been filled by a brother. We thus see how
the unconscious jealousy of Arthur (a jealousy which was itself
probably only a displacement of that originally directed against

» Letters and Papers, XVII, 124.

* And certainly, as we are now in a position to see, no sagacious
woman would have done so; for however pure her past life might in reality
have been, Henry would probably sooner or later have been impelled by
his unconscious complexes to rake up some accusation of unchastity
against her.

* The name may of course very well have been significant in the case
of Catherine Howard also.

I. C. FLOGEL

his father) operated to the end of Henry’s matrimonial career and
acted as the determining factor in the choice of a wife more
than 40 years after Arthur’s death. At the same time Catherine
Howard’s betrothal to Seymour in one sense constituted her a sister
to Henry, so that the desire for an incestuous union was also satisfied.

A marriage entered into, as this one was, as the result of a
satisfactory compromise between the opposing forces of Henry’s
mind (all Henry’s primitive unconscious desires rooted in the
Oedipus complex finding gratification, but none of them too bla¬
tantly) gave promise of greater permanency and stability than had
been exhibited by most of his previous ventures in matrimony:
nor was this promise belied by the course of subsequent events.
On one occasion, it is true, Catherine was in danger through having
come into conflict with Henry’s egoistic tendencies (which had
become less and less restrained, as he grew older), but her tact
enabled her to surmount all difficulties arising from this source,
and the marriage seems to have remained a happy one until
Henry’s death three and a half years later, in January 1547.

We have now traced the operation of certain unconscious
motives throughout the whole of Henry’s sexual life. For the sake
of clearness we have distinguished three principal such motives:

1) the desire for opposition and the presence of a sexual rival,

2) a desire for incest, 3) a desire for chastity in his sexual partner.
All these motives are closely interconnected, and they are all
dependent on and derived from, the primitive Oedipus complex;
each motive, moreover, is present both in a positive and in a
negative form. That which Henry was impelled to do by the
operation of his unconscious desires he was equally impelled to
oppose, by the operation of (an often equally unconscious) resist¬
ance to these desires. Regarded as the outcome of the interaction
of these various conflicting forces, the abnormal features of
Henry’s married life can, it would appear, very largely be explained.

The importance of studies such as that upon which we have
been here engaged, apart from such value as they may have for
the elucidation of historical problems, lies in the confirmation which
they afford of results obtained by the process of psycho-analysis
carried on with living individuals. These results are often so
opposed to what we are accustomed to regard both as common
sense and common decency, that their acceptance is a matter of
very considerable difficulty in the case of all persons who have

ON THE CHARACTER AND MARRIED LIFE OF HENRY Vm 56

not themselves extensively employed the psycho-analytic method.
Even by psycho-analysts themselves additional evidence for the
validity of their conclusions from a fresh field of inquiry must al¬
ways be most welcome. As such a source of additional evidence,
the data of history would seem in some respects to be peculiarly
acceptable. Although these data must always be inferior in scope
and detail to evidence obtained from living persons, they present
the following two great advantages: first, that the full data are open
to investigation and verification by others, whereas in most psycho¬
analytic investigations the complete material on which conclusions
are based are available only to the analyst himself; and secondly,
that in the case of persons long since dead there can be no
question of the influence either of direct suggestion or of the
more subtle effects of psycho-analytic training and tradition. The
actions and sayings of historical personages can have no possible
reference to Freud’s theories, whereas the patient in the phy¬
sician’s consulting room is, it may be said, necessarily to some
extent affected by the atmosphere of belief in psycho-analytic doc¬
trine in which he finds himself.

Thus it would appear that the application of the psycho-analytic
findings to historical material should furnish in general a most
necessary and desirable test of the validity of the psycho-analytic
method itself. If the psychic mechanisms revealed by the process
of psycho-analysis upon the living subject are to be regarded as
fundamental features of the human mind, and not as mere arti¬
facts or pathological conditions occurring only in neurotic persons,
they should be discoverable as factors operating in the lives of
men and women of the past, wherever the available data bearing
on these lives are adequate in quantity and quality. A certain
number of studies directed to this end have already been made,
and by their demonstration of the fact that the behaviour of
individuals long since dead can be satisfactorily accounted for
on psycho-analytic theories (and perhaps in no other way)^
have afforded very valuable corroboration of the utility and vali¬
dity of the psycho-analytic method. In the present paper we
have endeavoured, it is hoped not altogether fruitlessly, to bring
to light some further evidence pointing to the same conclusion.

* As of course to all records of human life and labour which have
come about independently of the work of psycho-analysts themselves;
such a myths, legends, customs, literary and artistic productions etc.

FREUD’S PSYCHOLOGY*

Dr. DOUGLAS BRYAN, London.

The publication of Freud’s views on mental functioning marks
the beginning of a new era in psychology. It was impossible to
read the older psychologies and at the same time really to feel
that there existed a sound knowledge of the nature of the mind,
or that its mechanisms had been fully grasped. There remained,
on the contrary, a sense of voidness which could not be removed
by simply memorising long words and involved sentences, and
the gropings after enlightenment would usually end either in
despair or in metaphysical speculations. Freud’s psychology has
altered all this, for although it necessitates our adopting a new
attitude to the functioning of the mind, yet its principles are so
intelligible, its hypotheses so demonstrably true, that the general
acceptance of it can only be a matter of time.

There is no doubt that if Freud’s views are in the future
confirmed many old concepts in the realm of psychology will have
to be revised, and the principles which he has enunciated will be
made the bed-rock upon which psychology of the future will be
built. Already we are finding that certain psychologists of to-day^
who will not subscribe to the Freudian principles, are making
covert use of these to describe mental mechanisms, and one can
see that they feel deep within themselves the truth of his views,
though they are loath to admit it. Those who have set themselves
the task of investigating this new psychology in an unbiassed
manner are unanimous in their opinion as to the truth of Freud’s
concepts. Still there is much work to be done, for if the Freudian
psychology is to be the foundation of psychology of the future,
no stone must be left unturned that might help in proving or
disproving, as the case maybe, the accuracy of Freud’s individual
statements.

‘ This is the first of a series of elementary didactic articles on psycho¬
analysis. (Ed.) ,

FREUD’S PSYCHOLOGY

Freud has not built up his psychological system on preconceived
ideas; this system is simply the formulation of conclusions that
were forced upon him. After great experience both with normal
as well as abnormal mental states, he was assailed with a
constant recurrence of facts which could not be denied, and so
he formulated his psychological principles which constitute the
foundation on which his psycho-analytical procedure is based.

Freud divides mental functioning into two parts:

1. Conscious.

2. Unconscious.

By the term conscious he denotes all mental processes of
which a person is aware at a given moment. In contradistinction
to this, all other mental processes are termed unconscious.

The essential criterion of consciousness is awareness ; the mental
process may be quite distinct or on the other hand it may be
very indistinct, still if the person is aware of it the term conscious
must be applied.

This definition is exceedingly important, but if fully appreciated
it is quite simple. One has only to apply the test of asking a
person if at a given moment he was aware of what was taking
place in his mind, to have an infallible proof as to whether a
process was conscious or not. Freud is not concerned with such
terms as “fringe of consciousness”, “threshold of consciousness”
etc., his definition is clear and precise. Nothing more than he says
is included in it and nothing less.

Further, Freud compares consciousness with a sense organ, in
that it perceives and differentiates or renders aware psychical
processes and qualities. It is not only concerned with the perception
of stimuli produced externally, but also with internal psychical
processes. I believe that Freud was the first to point out the
comparison of consciousness with a sense organ. The practical
importance of this concept is very great, for it gives to psycho¬
logical problems quite another outlook.

Another important attribute of consciousness is its power of
selection ; although its capacity in this direction is to a certain
extent limited, yet it is able to exercise a good deal of choice.
In general it may be said that consciousness chooses what is
pleasurable and avoids what is painful. In other words, the
awareness of mental processes of a painful nature is avoided as
much as possible. The truth of this statement is evident on a

DR. DOUGLAS BRYAN

moment’s reflection. Everyone must recognise that we do our best
to avoid thinking about disagreeable things, and if such do appear
in consciousness we endeavour to put them away. This particular
attribute of consciousness is of great service to us, for if it did
not exist and painful thoughts were allowed to appear in con¬
sciousness indiscriminately we should be in a constant state of
distress, such as we see in so many neurotic persons.

This is all that need be said at present regarding consciousness,
and I will pass on to the more important subject, the unconscious.

The unconscious, as I have mentioned above, consists of all
mental processes which are not conscious, i. e. of which the person
is unaware at a given moment. Under the term mental processes
are included thoughts, ideas, trends and wishes, in short, all forms
of mental activity.

In forming an idea of the unconscious the usual difficulty lies
in recognising the fact that mental activity can take place un¬
consciously. Mental activity is so apt to be conceived only from
a conscious point of view, but it should be evident that it is all
the time going on unconsciously. The mental processes that are
conscious, i. e. those of which we are aware, are simply end-
products. They may be likened to the articles in a shop window,
about the manufacture of which from raw materials we know
practically nothing, though these articles could not be there
unless a whole series of complicated processes had been previously
carried out. It is just the same in the mental sphere. The un¬
conscious is the factory in which the raw material is hidden from
view, but in which a ceaseless activity is taking place, producing
thoughts, etc., which eventually may appear in consciousness as
end-products, like the finished goods we see in the shop windows.
The analogy goes still further, for as everyone knows, the
articles in the shop windows are only a fraction of those produced
in the factories; in the same way the conscious mental processes
are only a fraction of what are in the unconscious. And again, as
the goods produced in the factories can influence our conduct in
life without our seeing them in the shop windows or even being
aware of their existence, so unconscious mental processes can
affect our lives without our being in any way cognisant of them.

The unconscious is also the storehouse of our memories and
the place whence our feelings and emotions originate. It contains
the whole of our life’s history, nothing that has at any time

FREUD’S PSYCHOLOGY

entered the unconscious is lost, neither has anything that has ever
originated within the unconscious itself and remained unconscious
become extinct. These facts are being proved over and over again
by psycho-analysis and cannot be too strongly insisted upon.

Freud divides the unconscious into two parts :

1. The preconscious.

2. The true unconscious or the unconscious proper.

The preconscious may be defined as that part of the un¬
conscious whose contents are able to enter consciousness in
undisguised form and from which memories can be recalled
spontaneously.

The true unconscious, on the other hand, is that part of the
unconscious whose contents are quite unable to enter consciousness
undisguised and from which memories cannot be spontaneously
recalled, unless a special technique like psycho-analysis is adopted;
however, some contents of the true unconscious can at times
enter consciousness provided that their primary form has been so
altered or disguised that consciousness can no longer recognise them.

The definition of the preconscious requires to be somewhat
amplified, lest misconceptions arise. The essential point is that a
potentiality exists for its contents to enter consciousness in their
primary undisguised form, but this does not necessarily mean that
they can at any given moment be consciously produced. It is
perfectly well known that very often one wishes to recall some-
thing, but try as hard as one can, it • is quite impossible to
become conscious of it, however, later, the idea or memory
enters consciousness practically without effort. The fact of the
inability to recall a thing at a given moment in no way detracts
from the definition, for though the idea would not come into
consciousness just when required, eventually it was able to appear
there.

The preconscious forms by far the greater part of the un¬
conscious. It consists of the majority of our thoughts, ideas, wishes
and memories. In it there is a ceaseless mental activity going on,
and it is linked up with the true unconscious by means of paths
of association between ideas, etc.

From a schematic point of view I consider it useful to look
upon the preconscious as having depth. If this idea is adopted,
though Freud himself does not do so, then it can be said that
those ideas nearest to consciousness will in general be the easiest

DR. DOUGLAS BRYAN

to recall, while those ideas in its deepest part will be-the most
difficult. The further removed from consciousness the greatei: the
task of recall. Still this statement is not always borne out. One
often feels that a memory is “on the tip of the tongue”, therefore
it cannot be far removed from consciousness, but still one cannot
remember it. The reason for this is that it is very strongly
associated with an idea which is much further removed from
consciousness and one which for some reason or other conscious¬
ness is very chary about admitting, and so the more superficial
idea is held back.

It must also be remembered that preconscious ideas can become
associated with ideas in the true unconscious, and the firmer the
union between such ideas the more unlikely are they to be able
to enter consciousness easily.

It must be borne in mind that there are numbers of ideas,
wishes, etc. formed in the preconscious that never enter conscious¬
ness at all, but nevertheless they can exert a marked influence
upon our conduct by virtue of their effect upon those thoughts
which become conscious.

I will now pass on to consider the true unconscious. As I have
said, the contents of the true unconscious are not able to enter
consciousness in their primary form. Most of them are “repressed”.

Before proceeding further I should like to say a few words
concerning the use of the word “repressed”. It has a precise
meaning in Freud’s psychology and this should be strictly adhered
to. It is very apt to be used loosely and thus misconceptions
often occur. Freud uses the word solely with reference to the
contents of the true unconscious, and in this sense only should
it be employed when it has any relation to his psychological
conceptions. When he says that an idea is repressed it is im¬
mediately recognised that that idea is in the true unconscious; in
other words, it is in a state of repression and therefore unable
to enter consciousness in its primary form.

The words repressed and suppressed are not used synonymously
by psycho-analytical writers, the former being always used in a
special technical sense, the latter in its usual one. Repression has
only to do with the true unconscious. The term is used solely
with reference to those mental processes in the true unconscious
which are prevented by the barrier, to be mentioned later, from
entering consciousness; they are said to be repressed. Repression

FREUD’S PSYCHOLOGY

is a purely unconscious condition. Suppression, on the other hand,
may be carried out either consciously or unconsciously. An ex¬
penditure of energy is ceaselessly taking place to keep up the
state of repression, whereas the expenditure of energy for the
purpose of suppression is very variable, depending entirely upon
the intensity of the thing to be suppressed. The energy expended
in repression is preconscious, but that with regard to suppression
may be a conscious expenditure. A thought can be suppressed
and if it reaches the true unconscious it has been repressed or is
in a state of repression.

After this digression I will return to the consideration of the
true unconscious. This part of the unconscious is formed mainly
during the first five or six years of life. It consists of thoughts,
ideas, trends, wishes and memories which in their primary form
are wholly repugnant to consciousness, being for the most part
infantile, primitive, egocentric and crude. During these early years
of life the primitive impulses and interests have more or less
full play, but very soon the effects of education, teaching and
morals place an interdict upon the manifestation of such impulses,
and constitute a strong barrier against them. This is the barrier
to which I referred in the last paragraph. Now this barrier is
a repressing force, which is constantly exerting itself to prevent
the contents of the true unconscious from reaching consciousness,
— these contents striving as they do in order to obtain an outlet
through consciousness to discharge the energy with which they
are invested.

Besides acting as a repressing force this barrier also acts as
an obstruction against attempts from without to penetrate into the
true unconscious. To this aspect of the barrier a special term is
applied, namely, “resistance”. This resistance is easily demonstrable.
When a person is being psycho-analysed and he is giving free
associations to some idea or memory, he may suddenly come to
a stop, hesitate or begin talking about irrelevant matters. If now
he is requested to continue from where the breaking off took
place, signs of annoyance or even anger may be the result, or he
will tell you that his mind is a blank, no thoughts will come, and
all kinds of subterfuges are adopted to avoid continuing from
this point. If he is asked why he does not go on, he will as often
as not say that he cannot explain it but that something seems to
prevent him from continuing. He may even add that his thoughts

DR. DOUGLAS BRYAN

seem to be blocked. The more he is urged to express his thoughts,
the more disturbed does he become. It is perfectly obvious to
anyone seeing this condition that some obstacle has been met
with which resists further penetration. This obstacle is the barrier
which if penetrated would allow something to appear in conscious¬
ness that would be repugnant to the personality; therefore to
avoid this contingency the resistance acts in the way indicated.
The barrier acting as a repressing force and as resistance is a
very useful asset to the individual. If it were not present then the
most primitive impulses would be constantly in evidence, and the
mind would be filled with all manner of disagreeable and repugnant
thoughts, ideas and wishes; in short, we should be purely selfish
egoists of an entirely asocial character. The existence of this barrier
is therefore of fundamental importance for the individual and the
community in general.

There is still another function performed by this barrier, and
that is one of censoring, hence in this respect Freud has named
it the “censorship”. I have mentioned that the contents of the true
unconscious are constantly striving to enter consciousness, and
also in defining this true unconscious I stated that the ideas in it
could not reach consciousness in their primary form^ but might
do so if they were so changed and altered that their original
form.was no longer recognisable. The barrier, or censorship as it
is called from this aspect, standing as it does between the true
unconscious and the preconscious, will not allow the contents of
the true unconscious to enter consciousness unless they have been
so disguised that consciousness can see nothing offensive in them.
The censorship acts just like the editor who will not allow the
unvarnished truth to appear in his paper for fear of offending his
readers, and therefore draws his blue pencil through the dis¬
agreeable passages and returns the article to the writer. If now
the author again presents the same subject, but has concealed the
plain truth in symbolical or allegorical language, so that its real
meaning is disguised, then the editor will publish it.

Freud also considers that there is a censorship situated
between the preconscious and consciousness, but its activity is
nothing like so marked as the censorship I have just mentioned;
it acts mainly on those preconscious ideas that have associations
in the unconscious.

Freud considers that there originally exist in every human

FREUD’S PSYCHOLOGY

mind two separate systems of mental activity, which may be
looked upon as the precursors of unconscious and conscious
thinking. These two systems he terms the primary and secondary
psychic systems.

He views the mind as a complex reflex apparatus which can
be stimulated from within or without. The stimulus acts upon
the sensorial end of the apparatus and sets up a movement which
tends to discharge itself through the other, the motor end. Now
the fact that a movement is set up in the apparatus indicates
that energy is involved. This psychical energy is capable of
increase, diminution and displacement, and also of being dissipated.
It is technically termed affect, which corresponds with what we
popularly call “feeling”. To every mental process there is a
certain amount of energy or affect attached, but the quantity is
very variable. This is perfectly well known, for everyone recog¬
nises how much more feeling is attached to certain ideas than
to others, and also that at different periods the affect associated
with the same idea varies considerably. For instance, on the
death of a beloved person all tlie thoughts concerning him will
arouse very strong emotion, whereas when time has elapsed
there will not be anything like the same display of affect on
thinking or speaking about him. This variability of the amount of
affect attached to ideas applies also to unconscious ones.

There is a condition with regard to the psychical energy which
may produce far-reaching effects; it is known as “displacement
of affect”. By this is meant that the affect originally attached to
a certain idea may move from it and become attached to another
idea which is in some way associated with the primary one, so
that the second idea may be said to be representative of the first.
This process of displacement usually takes place unconsciously,
but its recognition has been of the greatest significance in aiding
our understanding of the mechanisms of the neuroses as well as
of normal mental functioning. It is this process, for instance, that
underlies the attitude of the spinster towards her pet animal, also
that of the person who is afraid of perfectly harmless things, such
as spiders or worms, closed rooms or tunnels. These things have
in such cases been invested with affect out of all proportion to
their value. The affect does not really belong to them but has been
displaced from a much more significant idea in the person’s un¬
conscious, one in regard to which the affect was fully justified.

DR. DOUGLAS BRYAN

The reasons for this displacement I cannot enter into here except
to say that the original idea which is entirely repugnant to the
personality of the individual concerned, is by means of this dis¬
placement rendered practically incapable of obtruding on conscious¬
ness, though indirectly it is represented and discharged through
consciousness by means of the second idea, which does not arouse
such intense feelings of repugnancy.

The next point to be noted about this psychical energy is
that excessive accumulation of it results in a tension which is
perceived as discomfort, and there is a constant tendency towards
its discharge. This discharge is experienced as pleasure, relief or
gratification.

In the primary system relief of the discomfort is probably
attained by what is known as the process of “regression”. By this
is meant that in the infant, for instance, the recurrence of a need,
such as hunger, gives rise to the desire to reproduce the per¬
ception associated with the satisfaction of it, L e. a hallucinatory
perception is produced, and for the moment the need is stilled.
However, sooner or later this regression is found inadequate for
bringing about the relief of the tension, and so the psychical
energy sets in motion further groups of mental processes. The
function of these latter processes is to modify the environment,
so as to occasion an externally evoked perception. The excitation
now acts therefore upon the motor end of the apparatus, the infant
cries and gets fed; thus the environment is changed, the per¬
ception is externally evoked and gratification is attained. This is
brought about by means of the secondary system.

Throughout life there always exists the tendency to regression
in the mental functioning of every individual, but some people
show it very much more than others. The difference between the
two systems in allaying excitation may be compared to that
between day-dreaming and action, which are two methods of
attaining relief from psychical tension. The one is an imaginary
gratification, the other a real one.

In the primary system the freest possible movement takes
place, associations between ideas are most easily formed and in it
logical thought is entirely lacking. On the other hand the secondary
system tends to inhibit this freedom of movement, i. e., to act
as a control over the primary system. This control is never a
complete one, for in numerous instances our logical thinking

FREUD’S PSYCHOLOGY

succumbs to the influence of the first system, an occurrence most
clearly seen in delirium, insanity and ordinary night dreams.

The primary system remains unaltered throughout life and goes
to make up the true unconscious. The secondary system becomes
the preconscious and conscious.

One of the effects of the control and inhibitory action of the
secondary system over the primary one is to bring about the
highly important state of psychical repression. The primary system
is constantly striving for pleasure, which is the outcome of relief
from psychical tension. Now certain of these strivings are inhibited
by the secondary system, because their appearance in conscious¬
ness would be repugnant to the conscious personality of the
individual. The active inhibiting forces are those obtained through
teaching, education, morals and social tradition, all of which from
an early date begin to exercise an increasing influence on the
small child. These forces I have previously mentioned as constituting
the barrier between the true unconscious and the preconscious.
When for some reason or other one of these primary strivings
urges for gratification, the energy attached to the idea is inhibited.
As a result of this an intrapsychical conflict is set up. The conflict
is usually solved by the primary idea being shut off or dissociated,
and the energy which was attached to it flowing off along other
paths of association and becoming attached to ideas which are
psychically related to the primary one, but which are no longer
inhibited by the secondary system; in this way the energy is
discharged. These dissociated strivings are eventually the contents
of the true unconscious, which are ^kept in a state of repression
by virtue of the continuous activity of the inhibitory or re¬
pressing forces.

The question of psychical repression is a highly important one,
for not only is it the most active agent underlying the various
manifestations of the neuroses, but it also enables us to obtain a
more precise understanding of human conduct in general. It shows
us that the motives which we give as reasons for our behaviour
are generally untenable, since the essential cause lies hidden in
the true unconscious, and what we assign as the cause is only a
representative of the true cause, which has become dissociated.
The process by which a spurious cause is thus substituted for the
real (unconscious) cause, is usually termed rationalisation.

There is another part of Freud’s psychology to which I must

DR. DOUGLAS BRYAN

allude, namely, the significance he attaches to the psycho-sexual
trends.

Freud considers that when the infant comes into the world it
brings with it the sexual impulse, though certainly not in the
form in which it is manifested in later life, but still in forms that
are demonstrable. The misconceptions that have arisen with regard
to this point are partly due to the fact that this has by some
been taken to mean that the infant shows the same manifestations
of the impulse as those seen in the adult. These obviously could
not be altogether the same, for physiological reasons alone. There
are, however, notable similarities on the physiological side between
these phenomena in the infant and the adult, and when the
psychological side of the impulse is carefully studied, striking
analogies are found there also, so that an unbiassed observer
can only come to the conclusion that the same impulse is active
at both periods. Freud, having recognised this, simply widened
the concept of the word sexual so as to include all manifestations
of the impulse whether they occurred in the adult or in the child.

Now many of these psycho-sexual trends in the infant very
soon become incompatible with the child’s environment, they
are crude, egoistic, a-moral and ofttimes repugnant, so that very
soon they are shut off and form the greater part of the true
unconscious. However, they have a great amount of energy
attached to them and they are constantly striving for gratification.
This energy works itself off through other associations, as was
explained above. A certain amount of this energy is used up in
aims which are of a non-sexual character and which are of use
in the social life of the individual. This process is termed sublimation.
It may be more clearly defined by saying that sublimation is an
unconscious process in which psychical energy is displaced from
a primitive and infantile sexual aim on to a non-sexual one, the
latter aim being at the same time psychically related to the
former. Sublimation takes place chiefly in the early years of life.
The influence of the psycho-sexual trends in both normal and
abnormal mental states is very great, for all the energy attached
to them is not used up in sublimation, but works itself off in
ways that are often detrimental to the individual. Much of our
conduct and many of our various attitudes are conditioned through
the primitive and infantile activities of the sexual impulse, and
the more we know about its mode of functioning the better rea

FREUD'S PSYCHOLOGY

we able to guide its energies into proper and useful channels, and
at the same time gain a more precise knowledge of normal and
abnormal mental conditions.

After these few remarks on Freud’s psychology it will readily
be seen that he postulates 'a rigid determinism in the whole of
the mental sphere. He leaves nothing to “chance” where mental
activity is concerned. His method of psycho-analysis is based on
this fundamental concept, which has been substantiated over and
over again by his co-workers.

The principles of Freud’s psychology can be applied in fields
both numerous and diverse. Not only are they applicable in the
sphere of medicine, especially as regards our understanding of the
neuroses and psychoses, but they also provide us with a fresh
point of view in such subjects as mythology, folk-lore, superstition,
dreams and wit. In all these fields, and many others that could
be mentioned, there is a vast amount of work still to be done;
much has been accomplished by Freud and the other leading
psycho-analysts, but the work is urgently in need of extension at
the hands of other investigators. This work cannot be carried out
until Freud’s psychological principles have been fully assimilated,
and it is hoped that the few points that I have brought forward
will stimulate those interested in his work to obtain from his
own writings a fuller and more precise understanding of his
psychology.

5 *

REVIEW

OF THE RECENT PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL LITERATURE

IN ENGLISH

STANFORD READ, M. D., Salisbury

( 1 ).

( 2 ).

(3) .

(4) .

(5) .

( 6 ) .

(7) .

( 8 ) .
(9).

( 10 ).

( 11 ).

( 12 ).

(13) .

(14) .

(15) .

BIBLIOGRAPHY

AMES, T. H, (with R. Mac Robert). Psychogenic Convulsions. Med.

Record. Vol. LXXXVII. No. 22. May 29 th. 1915.

BAHR, M. Report of a case of hysteria. A psychoanalytical study.

Denver Med. Times. Vol. XXXIV. 1915. No. 12.

BAYLEY, H. The lost language of symbolism. Vols 2. Williams &
Norgate, London.

BELLAMY, R. An act of everyday life treated as a pretended dream
and interpreted by psychoanalysis. J. of Abn. Psych. Vol. X. No. 1.
BENEDICT, A. L. The psychological effect of the fairy story. New
York Medical Journ. Vol. XCIX. No. 19. May 9 th. 1914.

IBID. Dreams. New York Medical Journal. April 4th. 1919.

BIRD, C. From Home to the Charge: A psychological study of the
soldier. Amer. J. of Psychol. Vol. XXVIII. No. 3. July 1917. P. 316.

BLANCHARD, P. A psychoanalytic study of Auguste Comte. Amer.

J. of. Psychol. Vol. XXIX. No. 2. April 1918.

BLANTON, S. An unusual case of speech inhibition. J. of. Abn.
Psych. Vol. XI. No. 5. P. 325.

BRADBY, M. K. Psychoanalysis and its place in life. Lond. Henry
Frowde & Hodder & Stoughton. 1919. Illustrated. Pp. XI and 266.

BRAVIT. Prevalent theories in Hebrew literature on the causation
of dreams. Med. Review of Rev. 1914. No. 20.

BRILL, A. A. Psychoanalysis from a day’s work. J. of Abn. Psych.
Vol. VIII. No. 6. P. 310.

IBID. Artificial dreams and lying. J. of Abn. Psych. Vol. IX. No. 5. P. 321.
IBID. Psychoanalysis. Its theories and practical application. 2nd
Edition. W. B. Sanders & Co. Philad. & Lond.

IBID. Fairy tales as a determinant of dreams and neurotic symptoms.

New York Med. Journ. March 21 st. 1914.

IBID. The Psychopathology of the new dances. New York Med.
Journ. April 25th. 1914.

(16).

REVIEW OF THE RECENT PSYCHOANALYTICAL LITERATURE 69

(17) . IBID. Psychoanalysis: its scope and limitation. International Clinics.

Vol. II. Series 25.

(18) . IBID. Masturbation, its causes and sequelae. Woman’s Med. Journ.

May 1915.

(19) . IBID. Psychopathology of noise. New York Med. Journ. Vol. CIV.

No. 24. Dec. 9 th. 1916.

(20) . IBID. The adjustment of the Jew to the American environment.

Mental Hygiene. Vol. II. No. 2. Pp. 219-231. April 1918.

(21) . IBID. The psychopathology of selections of vocations; preliminary

communication. Med. Record. Feb. 23 rd. 1918.

(22) . IBID. Facts and fancies in psychoanalytic treatment. Archives of

Neurology and Psychiatry. Vol. II. No. 2. P. 230.

(23) . BRINK, L. A. Frazer’s Golden Bough. A critical Review and

comparison. Psychoanalytic Rev. Vol. III. No. 1. P. 43.

(24) . IBID, (with S. E. Jelliffe). Compulsion and Freedom: the Phantasy

of the Willow Tree. Psychoanalytic Rev. Vol. V. No. 3. P. 255.

(25) . IBID, (with S. E. Jelliffe). The role of animals in the unconscious.

Psychoanalytic Rev. Vol. III. No. 1. P. 43.

(26) . BROOM, W. What is psychoanalysis? Nature. 1913—1914. Vol. XCII.

P. 643.

(27) . BROWN, W. Freud’s Theory of the Unconscious. Brit. Journ. of

Psych. Vol. VI. Parts 3 & 4. Feb. 1914.

(28) . IBID. The treatment of cases of shell shock in an advanced neuro¬

logical centre. Lancet. Aug. 17 th. 1918.

(29) . BROWN, H. W. A literary forerunner of Freud. Psychoanalytic.

Rev. Vol. IV. No. 1. P. 64.

(30) . BROWN, S. The sex worship and symbolism of primitive races

J. of Abn. Psych. Vol. X. No. 5. P. 297 & No. 6. P. 418.

(31) . BURR, C. B. Art in the insane. Amer. Journ. of Insanity. Vol. LXXIII.

No. 2. Oct. 1916. P. 165. Also Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. III. No. 4.

(32) . IBID. Two very definite wish-fulfillment dreams. Psychoanalytic Rev.

Vol. III. No. 3. P. 292.

(33) . BURROW, T. The meaning of psychoanalysis. J. of Abn. Psych.

Vol. XII. No. 1. P. 58.

(34) . IBID. Conscious and unconscious mentation from the psychoanalytic

view point. Psych. Bull. Vol. IX. 154—160.

(35) . IBID. Conceptions and misconceptions in psychoanalysis. J. of the

Amer. Med. Assoc. Vol. LXVIII. Feb. 3rd. 1917.

(36) . IBID. The origin of Incest-Awe. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. V. No. 33. P. 243.

(37) . IBID. Notes with reference to Freud, Jung and Adler. J. of Abn.

Psych. Vol. XII. No. 3. P. 161.

(38) . IBID. Character and the Neuroses. Psychoanalytic Rev. Vol. I. No. 2.

Feb. 1914. P. 121.

70 REVIEW

(39) . IBID, The genesis and meaning of homosexuality and its relation to

the problem of introverted mental states. Psychoanalytic Rev.
Vol. IV. No. 3. P. 272.

(40) . IBID. The psychanalyst and the community. J. of Amer. Med. Assoc.

1914. Vol. LXn. P. 1876.

(41) . IBID. Philology of hysteria. The neuroses in the light of Freudian

psychology. J. of the Amer. Med. Assoc. Mch. 1916.

(42) . CAMPBELL, C. M. A case of childhood conflicts with prominent

reference to the urinary system: with some general considerations
on urinary symptoms in the psycho neuroses and psychoses. Psycho-
analyt. Rev. Vol. V. No. 3. P. 269.

(43) . IBID. The form and content of the psychosis. The r61e of psycho¬

analysis in psychiatry. Cornell Univ. Med. Bull. Studies from the
Dept, of Psychopathology. Vol. V. No. 1. July 1915.

(44) . IBID. The application of psychoanalysis to insanity. Ref. as above.

(45) . CAMPBELL, K. C. A case of hysterical amblyopia. Brit. Med. Journ.

Sept. 18, 1915.

(46) . CARR, H. W. The philosophical aspects of Freud’s theories of dream

interpretation. Mind. 1917. No. 91.

(47) . CARLISLE, C. L. The translation of symptoms into their mechanisms.

Amer. J. of Insanity. Vol. LXII. 1914. P. 279.

(48) . CHAMBERS, W. D. Mental wards with the British Expeditionary force:

A Review of ten months experience. J. of Ment. Sc. Vol. LXV.
July 1919.

(49) . CHAPMAN, R. The aetiology of anxious depressions. New York State

Hosp. Bull. Vol. V.

(50) . CLARK, L. P. The newer work on homosexuality. New York State

Hosp. Bull. Nov. 1914.

(51) . IBID. Clinical studies in Epilepsy. Psychiatric Bull. Jan. 1916. April

1916. Jan. 1917.

(52) . IBID. A further study of mental content in Epilepsy. Psychiatric

Bull. Oct. 1917.

(53) . IBID. A personality study of the Epileptic Constitution. Amer. J. of

Med. Sc. 1914. Vol. CXLVm. P. 729.

(54) . IBID. The true Epileptic. New York Med. Journ. May 4th. 1918. P. 817.

(55) . IBID. Study of certain aspects of Epilepsy compared with the emotional

life and impulsive movement of the infant. Interstate Med. Journ.
Vol. XXII. No. 10. Oct. 1915.

(56) . IBID. The psychological and therapeutic value of studying mental

content during and following Epileptic attacks. New York Med.
Journ. VoL CVI. No. 15. Oct. 13. 1917.

IBID. A discussion of the mechanism of mental torticollis. J. of Abn.
Psych. Vol. XII. No. 4. P. 257.

(57).

OF THE RECENT PSYCHOANALYTICAL LITERATURE IN ENGLISH 71

.(58). IBID. The psychologic treatment of retarded depressions. Amer. Journ.
of Insanity. Vol. LXXV. No. 3. P. 407.

(59) . IBID. The mechanisms of periodic mental depressions as shown in

two cases, and the therapeutic advantages of such studies. Rev.
of Neur. and Psychiatry. Vol. XII. No. 10. Oct. 1914.

(60) . IBID. Some personal results in psychoanalysis and the future of psycho¬

therapy. Boston Med. and Surg. Journ. Vol. CLXX. No. 24. June
11th. 1914. P. 903.

(61) . IBID. Some of the newer methods of treatment in nervous and mental

diseases. New York State Journ. of Med. June 1914.

(62) . IBID. Some observations upon the aetiology of mental torticollis. Med.

Record. Feb. 7th. 1914.

(63) . IBID. A further study upon mental torticollis as a psychoneurosis.

Med. Record. Feb. 28th. 1914.

(64) . IBID. Remarks upon mental infantilism. Med. Record. March. 28th. 1914.

(65) . IBID. The nature and pathogenesis of epilepsy. New York Med, Journ.

Feb. 27th, March 6th, 13th, 20th aiid 27th, 1915.

(66) . IBID. Some therapeutic suggestions derived from the newer psycho¬

logical studies upon the nature of essential Epilepsy. Med. Record.
Vol. LXXX. No. 10. March 4th. 1916.

(67) . IBID. A psychologic study of some alcoholics. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. VI.

No. 3. July 1919.

(68) . IBID. Some practical remarks upon the use of modified psychoanalysis

in the treatment of Borderland Neuroses and Psychoses. Psychoanalyt.
Rev. Vol. VI. No. 3. July 1919.

(69) . COLLINS, J. Astasia-Abasia. Med. Record. Vol. LXXXVII. No. 17

April 24th. 1915.

(70) . CONSTUET. The views of Plato and Freud on the etiology and.

treatment of hysteria. Boston Med. and Surg. Journ. 1914. P. 679.

(71) . CORIAT, I. H. What is psychoanalysis ? Moffat, Yard & Co. New York

1917. Pp. 127.

(72) . IBID. Some hysterical mechanisms in children. J. of Abn. Psych.

Vol. IX. Nos. 2 and 3.

(73) . IBID. Stammering as a psychoneurosis. J. of Abn. Psych. Vol. IX. No. 6.

(74) . IBID. Psychoneuroses among primitive tribes. J. of Abn. Psych. Vol. X.

No. 3. P. 201.

(75) . IBID. The meaning of dreams. Mind and Health series. Lond. Wm.

Heinemann. Pp. 191.

(76) . IBID. The treatment of Dementia Praecox by psychoanalysis. J. of Abn.

Psych. Vol. XII. No, 5. P. 326.

(77) . IBID. The sadism in Oscar Wilde’s Salome. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. I

No. 3. P. 257.

(78) . IBID. Some statistical results of the psychoanalytic treatment of the

psychoneuroses. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. IV. No. 2. P. 209.

REVIEW

(79) . IBID. The future of psychoanalysis. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. IV. No. 4.

P. 382.

(80) . IBID. Hermaphroditic dreams. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. IV. No. 4. P. 368.

(81) . CRENSHAW, H. Retaliation dreams. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. III. No. 4.

P. 391.

(82) . IBID. Dream Interpretation. New. York Med. Journ. Vol. XCIX.

April 11th. 1919.

(83) . CULPIN, M. Dreams and their value in treatment. The Practitioner.

Vol. CII. No. 3. March 1919.

(84) . DERCUM, F. X. Rest, suggestion, and other therapeutic measures in

nervous and mental disease. P. Blakiston Son & Co., Philad. P. 395.

(85) . DEVINE, H. The biological significance of delusions. J. of Ment. Sc.

Jan. 1916.

(86) . DILLON, F. The analysis of a composite neurosis. Lancet. Jan. 11th.

1919. P. 57.

(87) . DOOLEY, L. A study in correlation of normal complexes by means

of the Association test. Amer. J. of Psych. Vol. XXVII. No. 1.
Jan. 1916. Pp. 119—151.

(88) . IBID. Analysis of a case of Manic-Depressive psychosis showing

well-marked regressive stages. Psvehoanalyt. Rev. Vol. V. No. 1.

(89) . IBID. Psychoanalytic studies of genius. Amer. J. of Psych. Vol. XXVIL

No. 3. Pp. 363-416. July 1916.

(90) . DRYFOOS, A. D. The elements of psychoanalysis. New York. Med.

J. Vol. cm. No. 13. March 25th. 1916.

(91) DUNLAP, K. The pragmatic advantage of Freudo-Analysis. Psycho¬

analyt. Rev. Vol. I. No. 2. P. 149.

(92) . ■ EDER, M. D. War Shock. The psychoneuroses in war. Wm. Heine-

mann. London. 1917. Pp. 154.

(93) . IBID, (with Mrs. Eder). The conflicts in the unconscious of the child.

Child study.

(94) . IBID. The psychoneuroses of the war. Lancet. Aug. 12th. 1916.

(95) . IBID. Psychological perspectives. The New Age. July 20th. 1916.

(96) . IBID. Borderland Cases. Univ. Med. Record. Vol. V. No. 1. Jan. 1914.

(97) . ELLIS, Havelock. Psychoanalysis in relation to sex. J. of Ment. Sc.

Vol. LXIII. Oct. 1917.

(98) . IBID. The mechanism of sexual deviation. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. VI.

No. 3. July 1919.

(99) . EMERSON, L. E. The psychopathology of the family. J. of Abn.

Psych. Vol. IX. No. 5. P. 333.

(100) . IBID. The psychoanalytic treatment of Hystero-Epilepsy. J. of Abn.

Psych. Vol. X. No. 5. P. 315.

(101) . IBID. Some psychoanalytic studies of character. J. of Abn. Psych.

Vol. XL No. 4. P. 265.

OF THE RECENT PSYCHOANALYTICAL LITERATURE IN ENGLISH 73

(102) . IBID. Psychoanalysis and hospitals. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. I. No. 3.

P. 285.

(103) . IBID. A philosophy for psychoanalysts. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. II.

No. 4. P. 422.

(104) . IBID. The subconscious in its relation to the conscious, preconscious,

and unconscious. Psychoanal. Rev. Vol. VI. No. 1. P. 59.

(105) . EVANS, E. (with S. E. Jelliffe). Psoriasis as an Hysterical conversion

symbolization. New York Med. Journ. Vol. CIV. No. 23. Dec. 2nd. 1916.

(106) . EVARTS, A. B. The ontogenetic against the phylogenetic elements

in the psychoses of the coloured races. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. III.
No. 3. P. 272.

(107) . IBID. Coloured symbolism. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. VI. No. 2. P. 124.

(108) . IBID. A lace creation revealing an incest phantasy. Psychoanalyt. Rev.

Vol. V. No. 4. P. 364.

(109) . IBID. Dementia Praecox in the coloured race. Psychoanalyt. Rev.

Vol. 1. No. 4. P. 388.

(110) . FARNELL, F. J. Psychanalysis. New York. Med. Journ. Vol. CVIII.

No. 24. Dec. 14th. 1918.

(111) . FARRAR, C. B. War and Neuroses. Amer. J. of Insanity. Vol. LXIII.

No. 4. April 1917. Pp. 693—719.

(112) . FEDERN, P. The principles of pain-pleasure and of reality. Psychoanalyt.

Rev. Vol. II. No. 1. P. 1.

(113) . IBID. The infantile roots of masochism. New. York. Med. Journ. Vol.

C. No. 8. Aug. 22nd. 1914.

(114) . FLOGEL, j. C. Freudian mechanisms as factors in moral development.

Brit. J. of Psych. Vol. VIIL Part 4. June 1917.

(115) . FORSYTH, D. Functional nerve disease and the shock of battle. Lancet.

Dec. 25th. 1915.

(116) . FRINK, H. W. Morbid fears and compulsions. Their psychology and

psychoanalytic treatment. With an introduction by J. J. Putnam.
Moffat, Yard & Co. New York. 1918.

(117) . IBID. Three examples of name forgetting. J. of Abn. Psych. Vol. VIII.

No. 6. P. 385.

(118) . IBID. Some analyses in the psychopathology of everyday life. J. of

Abn. Psych. Vol. XII. No. 1. P. 25.

(119) . IBID. A psychoanalytic study of a severe case of Compulsion Neurosis.

Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. IV. Nos. 1, 2 and 3.

(120) . IBID. Dream and neurosis. Interstate Med. Journ. 1915.

(121) . IBID. What is a complex? J. of Amer. Med. Assoc. Vol. LXII. 1914.

(122) . FRY, F. R. The anxiety neuroses. Med. Press and Circular. Dec. 26th

1917.

(123) . GLUECK, B. The malingerer. Internat. Clinics. Vol. III. Series 25.1915.

(124) . IBID. Studies in forensic psychiatry. Little, Brown & Co. Boston 1917. Pp.269.

REVIEW

(125) .

(126) .

(127) .

(128) .

(129) .

(130) .

(131) .

(132) .

(133) .

(134) .

(135) .

(136) .

(137) .

(138) .

(139) .

(140) .

(141) .

(142) .

(143) .

(144) .

(145) .

(146) .

IBID. Adler’s conception of the neurotic constitution. A critical Review.

Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. IV. No. 2. P. 217.

IBID. The God man or Jehovah complex. New York Med. Journ. VoL
Cn. No. 10, Sept. 4th. 1915.

GORDON, A. Obsessive hallucinations and psychoanalysis. J. of Abn.
Psych. Vol. XII. No. 6. P. 423.

GOSLINE, H. I. A further application of the psychanalytic method.

J. of. Abn. Psych. Vol. XII. No. 5. P. 317.

GREENACRE, P. Content of the Schizophrenic characteristics occuring in
affective disorders. Amer. J. of Insanity. Vol. LXXV. No. 2. Oct. 1918.

GRIMBERG, L. Somnambulism. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. III. No. 4.
P. 386.

GROVES, E. R. Freud and Sociology. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. III. No. 3.
P. 241.

IBID. Freudian elements in the animism of the Niger Delta. Psycho¬
analyt. Rev. Vol. IV. No. 3. P. 333.

IBID. Sociology and psychoanalytic psychology; an interpretation of
the Freudian hypothesis. Amer. J. of Sociol. 1917. Vol. XXIII.
Pp. 107—116.

HALL, STANLEY. The Freudian methods applied to anger. Amer. J.

of Psych. Vol. XXVL No. 3. Pp. 438—443. July 1915.

HART, B. The psychology of rumour. Proc. Royal Soc. of Med. (Sect.

of psychiatry) 1916. Vol. IX. Pp. 1—23.

IBID. The psychology of Freud and his school. J.of Ment.Sc. 1914. No. 234.
IBID. Psychotherapy. Proc. R. Soc. of Med. 1918.

HASSALL, J. C. R61e of sexual complex in dementia praecox. Psycho¬
analyt. Rev. Vol. II. No. 3. P. 260.

IBID. The serpent as a symbol. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. VI. No. 3.
July 1919.

HAY, J. (Jnr). Mrs. Marden’s ordeal. Little, Brown & Co. Boston.
1918. Pp. 307. CA noveO.

HEALEY, W. The Individual delinquent. W. Heinemann. 1915. London.
P. 380.

IBID. Mental conflicts and misconduct. Little, Brown & Co. 1917.
Boston. P. 330.

HILL, M. C. (With C. S. Yoakum). Persistent complexes derived through
free association. J. of Abn. Psych. Vol. XI. No. 4. P. 215.

IBID. (With C. S. Yoakum). Genetic antecedents of free association
materials. Miss Z's case. J. of Abn. Psych. Vol. XI. No. 6. P. 396.

HILL, O. B. Psychoanalysis. Indian Med. Gazette. Calcutta. 1914.
Vol. XLIV.

HINKLE, B. M. Jung’s libido theory and the Bergsonian philosophy.
New York Med. Journ. Vol. XCIX. No. 22. May 30th. 1919.

OF THE RECENT PSYCHOANALYTICAL LITERATURE IN ENGLISH 75

(147) . HOCH, A. Precipitating causes in dementia praecox. Amer. J. of

Insanity. Vol. LXX. No. 3.

(148) . IBID. A study of the benign psychoses. John Hopkins Hosp. Bull.

Vol. XXVI. No. 291. May 1915.

(149) . HOLT, E. B. The Freudian wish and its place in Ethics. Holt.

New York. 1915. Pp. 212.

(150) . HULL. H. R. The long handicap. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. IV. No. 4.

P. 434.

(151) . HYSLOPP, G. H. Analysis and discussion of 225 personal dreams.

Proc. of Amer. Soc. for Psych. Research. Vol. VIII. Aug. 1914.

(152) . ISHAM, M. K. Some implications of psychoanalysis. New York Med.

Journ. Vol. CII. No. 8. Aug. 21st. 1915.

(153) . JELLIFFE, S. E. (with W. A. White). Diseases of the nervous system;

A text book of Neurology and Psychiatry. Lea & Ferbiger, Philad.

1915. Pp. 796.

(154) . IBID. Some notes on transference. J. of Abn. Psych. Vol. VIII. No. 5.

P. 302.

(155) . IBID. The technique of psychoanalysis. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. I.

Nos. 1—4; Vol. n. Nos. 1-4; Vol. III. Nos. 1-4; Vol. IV. Nos. 1 and 2.

(156) . IBID. Compulsion neurosis and primitive culture. Psychoanalyt. Rev.

Vol. I. No. 4. P. 361.

(157) . IBID, (with L. Brink). The role of animals in the unconscious. Psycho¬

analyt. Rev. Vol. IV. No. 3. P. 253.

(158) . IBID, (with L. Brink) Compulsion and Freedom: the phantasy of the

Willow Tree. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. V. No. 3. P. 255.

(159) . IBID. Contributions to psychotherapeutic technic through psycho¬

analysis. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. VI. No. 1. P. 1.

(160) . IBID, (with E. Evans). Psoriasis as an hysterical conversion symbolization.

New York Med. J. Vol. CIV. No. 23. Dec. 2nd. 1916.

(161) . IBID. Psychotherapy and the drama. New York Med. J. Vol. CVI.

No. 10. Sept. 8 th. 1917.

(162) . IBID. The epileptic attack in dynamic psychology. New York. Med. J.

Vol. CVIII. No. 4. July 27 th. 1918.

(163) . IBID. Psychoanalysis. Ref. Hand. Med. Sc. New York. 1917. Vol. VII.

P. 353.

(164) . JONES, ERNEST. Papers on Psycho-Analysis. Revised and enlarged

edition. 1918. 715 pp. Bailli^re, Tindall & Cox, London.

(Those papers in this book which were written and published elsewhere
subsequently to January 1914 are noted separately below and marked a.)

(165) . a IBID. The repression theory in its relation to memory. Brit. J. of Psych.

Vol. VIII. Part. 1. Oct. 1915. Pp. 33—47.

(166) . a IBID. The unconscious and its significance for psychopathology. Rev.

of Neur. and Psychiatry. Vol. XII. No. 11. 1914.

REVIEW

(167) . a IBID. The theory of symbolism. Brit. J. of Psych. Vol. IX. Part 2.

P. 181.

(168) . a IBID. Psychosexual impotence and anaesthesia. J. of Abn. Psych.

Vol. xm.

(169) . a IBID. War shock and Freud’s theory of the neuroses. Proc. Royal

Soc. of Med. (Section of Psychiatry). Vol. XI. March 1918.

(170) . a IBID. The unconscious mental life of the child. Child Study. Vol. IX.

(171) . a IBID. Anal-erotic character traits. J. of Abn. Psych. Vol. XIII. No. 5.

P. 261.

(172) . IBID. War and individual psychology. Sociolog. Rev. July 1915.

(173) . IBID. Why is the “Unconscious” unconscious? (Contribution to a

symposium). Oct. 1918. Brit. J. of Psych. Vol. IX. Part 2.

(174) . IBID. The case of Louis Bonaparte, King of Holland. J. of Abn. Psych.

Vol. VIII. No. 5. P. 289.

(175) . JUNG, C. G. ■ The theory of psychoanalysis. New York. Nerv. and

Ment. Dis. Publ. Co. Monograph 19. 1915.

(176) . IBID. On psychological understanding. J. of Abn. Psych. Vol. IX.

No. 6. P. 385.

(177) . IBID. Psychoanalysis. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. II. No. 3. P. 41.

(178) . IBID. The importance of the unconscious in psychopathology. Lancet

1914. Vol. II. Sep. 5 th. 1914.

(179) . KARPAS, M. Socrates in the light of modern psychopathology. J. of

Abn. Psych. Vol. X. No. 3. P. 185.

(180) . IBID. Civilization and insanity. New York Med. J. Vol. CII. No. 12.

Sep. 18th. 1914.

(181) . IBID. Dementia Praecox. New York Med. J. Vol. CIV. No. 1. July

1st. 1916.

(182) . IBID. The psychopathology of prostitution. New York Med. J. Vol. CVI.

No. 3. July 21 St. 1917.

(183) . KEMPF, E. J. Some studies in the psychopathology of acute dissociation

of the personality. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. II. No. 4. P. 361.

(184) . IBID. The social and sexual behaviour of infrahuman primates with

some comparable facts in human behaviour. Psychoanalyt. Rev.
Vol. IV. No. 2. P. 127.

(185) . IBID. The psychology of the Yellow Jacket. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. IV.

No. 4. P. 393.

(186) . IBID. Charles Darwin — The affective sources of his inspiration and

anxiety neurosis. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. V. No. 2. P. 151.

(187) . IBID. The psychoanalytic treatment of dementia praecox. Report of a

case. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. VI. No. 1. P. 15.

(188) . IBID. The Autonomic functions and the personality. Nerv. and Ment.

Dis. Publ. Co. New York. Monograph Series. No. 28.

(189) . KIMMINS, C. W. Childrens* dreams. The Times. Feb. 14th. 1919.

OF THE RECENI- PSYCHOANALYTICAL LITERATURE IN ENGLISH 77

(190) . KIRBY, G. H. Dementia Praecox deteriorations without Freud’s mecha¬

nisms. New York State Hosp. Bull. Vol. V. 3.

(191) . KNOX, H. A. Psychological pitfalls. New York Med. J. Vol. XCIX.

March 14th. 1914.

(192) . KOHS, S. C. The association method in its relation to the complex

and complex indicators. Amer. J. of Psych. Oct. 1914,

(193) . KUHLMANN, H. J. C. The father complex. Amer. J, of Insanity. Vol.

LXX. No. 4.

(194) . KUTTNER, A. B. Sons and lovers; a Freudian appreciation. Critical

Review. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. III. P. 295.

(195) . LAST, F. W. A psychological note on a photo-play. J. of Abn. Psych.

Vol. XL No. 5. P. 344.

(196) . LAY, W. Man’s unconscious conflict. Dodd, Mead & Co. New York

1917. Pp. 318.

(197) . IBID. The child’s unconscious conflict. Dodd, Mead & Co. New York

1919. Pp. 329.

(198) . IBID. The relation of psychoanalysis to education. Dodd, Mead &Co,

New York.

(199) . LEVIN, H. L. Organic and psychogenic delirium. New York Med. J.

Vol. XCIX. March 28th. 1914.

(200) . LILLIE, W. I. A mechanism producing hysterical abdominal distension.

J. of Nerv. and Ment. Dis. Vol. XLVI. P. 35.

(201) . LIND, J. E. The dream as a simple wish-fulfillment in the negro.

Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. 1. No. 3. P. 295.

(202) . IBID. The color complex in the negro. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. I.

No. 4. P. 404.

(203) . LIVING, C. G. The theory of psychoanalysis. New York 1915.

(204) . LONG, C. Psychoanalysis. The Practitioner. Vol. XCni. No. 1. July.

1914.

(205) . LOVEDAY, T. The Role of repression in forgetting. (A contribution

to a symposium). Brit. J. of Psych. Vol. VII. Part 2. Sep. 1914.

(206) . MacCURDY, J. T. The ethics of psychoanalysis. John Hopkins Med.

Bull. Vol. XXVi. No. 291. May 1915.

(207) . IBID. War Neuroses. Psychiatric Bull. July 1917. P. 243—354.

(208) . IBID. The productions in a manic-like state illustrating Freudian

mechanisms. J. of Abn. Psych. Vol. No. 6. P. 361.

(209) . IBID. A psychological feature of the precipitating causes in the

psychoses and its relation to art. J. of Abn. Psych. Vol IX.
No. 5. P. 297.

(210) . IBID, (with W. L. Treadway). Constructive delusions. J. of Abn. Psych.

Vol. X. No. 3. P. 153.

IBID. Concerning Hamlet and Orestes. J. of Abn. Psych. Vol. XIII.
No. 5. P. 250.

(211).

78 REVIEW

(212) . IBID. A clinical study of epileptic deterioration. Cornell Univ. Med.

Bull. Vol. VU. No. 4. April 1918. Also Psychiat. Bull. April 1916.

(213) . IBID. Epileptic dementia. Cornell Univ. Med. Bull. Vol. VII. No. 4.

April 1918.

(214) . IBID. Ethical aspects of psychoanalysis. John Hopkins Hosp. Bull.

Vol. XXVI. May 1915.

(215) . MacROBERT, R. (with T. H. Ames). Psychogenic convulsions. Med.

Record. Vol. LXXXVH. No. 22. March 29th. 1915.

(216) . IBID. The maternal instinct a factor in the prenatal development of

the epileptic type of nervous constitution. Med. Record. Vol.
LXXXVIII. No. 16. Oct. 1915.

(217) . MENZIES, K. Auto-erotic phenomena in adolescence, (with a foreword

by Ernest Jones), H. K. Lewis & Co. Lond. 1919. Pp. 94.

(218) . MILLER, R. S. Contributions to the psychopathology of everyday life,

their relation to abnormal mental phenomena. Psychoanalyt. Rev.
Vol. 11. P. 121.

(219) . MITCHELL, T. W. The role of repression in forgetting (Contribution

to a symposium). Brit. J. of Psych. Vol. VII. Part 2. Sep. 1914.

(220) . IBID. Psychology of the unconscious and psychoanalysis. Proc. of the

Soc. for Psych. Research. Vol. XXX. Part LXXV.

(221) . MOORE, T. V. The Hound of Heaven. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. V.

No. 4. P. 345.

(222) . MOYLE, H. B. Pain as a reaction of defence. Psychoanalyt. Rev.

Vol. IV. No. 2. P. 198.

(223) . MORDELL, A. The erotic motive in literature. Boni & Liveright.

New York. 1919. Pp. 250.

(224) . NICOLL, M. Why is the “Unconscious’* unconscious?. (Contribution to a

symposium). Brit. J. of Psych. Vol. IX. Part 2. Oct. 1918.

(225) . IBID. Dream psychology. Henry Frowde, Hodder & Stroughton. Oxford

Univ. Press. 1917. Pp. 188.

(226) . IBID. The conception of regression in psychological medicine. Lancet

June 8th. 1918.

(227) . OBERNDORF, C. P. Simple tic mechanisms. J. of the Amer. Med.

Assoc. Vol. LXVII. July 8th. 1916.

(228) . IBID. Analysis of a claustrophobia. Med. Record. Aug. 28th. 1915.

(229) . IBID. Slips of the tongue and pen. J. of Abn. Psych. Vol. VIII. No. 6.

P. 378.

(230) . IBID. Reactions to personal names. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. V. No. 1.

P. 47.

(231) . IBID. All analysis of certain neurotic symptoms. New York. Med. J.

Vol. CIV. No. 4. July 1916.

(232) . IBID. Traumatic Hysteria. New York Med. J. Vol. CVI. No. 19.

Nov. 10th. 1917.

OF THE RECENT PSYCHOANALYTICAL LITERATURE IN ENGLISH 79

(233) . IBID. Substitution reactions. New York. Med. J. 1914. Pp. 715—718.

(234) . IBID. Cases allied to manic-depressive insanity. New York State Hosp.

Bull. Vol. V. 3.

(235) . ODIER, C. A case of hysterical contracture. Arch, of Psychiatry.

May 1914. P. 158.

(236) . OSNATO, M. A critical review of the pathogenesis of dementia praecox,

with a discussion of the relation of psychoanalytical principles.
Amer. J. of Insanity. Vol. LXXV. No. 3. P. 411.

(237) . PARKER, G. M. Analytic view of the psychic factor in shock. New

York Med. J. Vol. CVI. Nos. 1 and 2. July 1918.

(238) . PAYNE, C. R. Some contributions of psychoanalysis to the problems

of education. N. Y. State Hosp. Bull. Aug. 1914.

(239) . PEAR, T. H. The analysis of some personal dreams with reference to

Freud’s theory of dream interpretation. Brit. J. of Psych. Vol. VI.
Parts 3 and 4. Feb. 1914.

(240) . IBID. The r6Ie of repression in forgetting (A contribution to a symposium).

Brit. J. of Psych. Vol. VH. No. 2. Sept. 1914.

(241) . PRICE, G. E. An unusual psychasthenic complex. J. of Nerv. and Ment.

Dis. Vol. XLIII. No. 4.

(242) . PRIDEAUX, E. Stammering in the war psychoneuroses. Lancet.

Vol. CXCVI. Feb. 8th. 1919. P. 217.

(243) . PRINCE, Morton. The psychology of the Kaiser. T. Fisher Unwin.

London. 1915. Pp. 75.

(244) . IBID. The unconscious. Macmillan. New York. 1914. Pp. 549.

(245) . IBID. The subconscious settings of ideas in relation to the pathology

of the psychoneuroses. J. of Abn. Psych. Vol. XI. No. 1. P. 1.

(246) . PUTNAM, J. J. Human motives. Little, Brown & Co. New York.

(247) . IBID. Some of the broader issues of the psychoanalytic movement.

Amer. J. Med. Sc. 1914. Vol. CXLVII. P. 389.

(248) . IBID. Dream interpretation and the theory of psychoanalysis. J. of Abn.

Psych. Vol. IX. No. 1. P. 36.

(249) . IBID. On the utilization of psychoanalytic principles in the study of

the neuroses. J. of. Abn. Psych. Vol. XI. No. 3. P. 172.

(250) . IBID. Sketch for a study of New England character. J. of Abn. Psych.

Vol. XU. No. 2. P. 73.

(251) . IBID. The work of Sigmund Freud. J. of Abn. Psych. Vol. XU. No. 3.

P. 145.

(252) . IBID. An interpretation of certain symbolisms. Psychoanalyt. Rev.

Vol. V. No. 2. P. 121.

(253) . IBID. The work of Alfred Adler, considered with especial reference to

that of Freud. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. lU. No. 2. 1916.

IBID. Psychoanalysis considered as a phase of education. J. of Nerv.
and Ment. Dis. Oct. 1914.

(254).

REVIEW

(255) .

(256) .

(257) .

(258) .

(259) .

(260) .
(261).

(262).

(263) .

(264) .

(265) .

(266) .

(267) .

(268) .

(269) .

(270) .

(271) .

(272) .

(273) .

(274) .

(275) .

(276) .

(277) .

IBID. Elements of strength and elements of weakness in psychoanalytic
doctrines. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. VI. No. 2. P. 117.

IBID. Services to be expected from the psychoanalytic movement in
the prevention of insanity. J. of The Amer. Med. Assoc. Vol. LXIQ.
Nov. 28th. 1914. Pp. 1891—1897.

IBID. The present status of psychoanalysis. Boston Med. and Surg.

J. 1914. Vol. CLXX. Pp. 897—903.

RALUNET, H. The causation of dreams. Med. Record. Feb. 28th. 1914.
READ, Carveth. The unconscious, Brit. J. of Psych. Vol. IX. Parts 3
and 4. P. 281.

READ. C. Stanford. A survey of war neuro-psychiatry. Mental
Hygiene. Vol. 11. No. 3. July 1918. Pp. 357—387.

IBID. A study of two epileptoid cases in soldiers. J. of Abn. Psych.
Vol. XIII. No. 1. P. 33.

IBID. War psychiatry. Proc. Royal Soc. of Med. Vol. XII. Nr. 8. P. 35.
IBID. A case of pseudologia phantastica. Rev. of Neur. and Psychiatry
Vol. XVI. Nos. 7 and 8. July-Aug. 1918.

IBID. Military psychiatry in peace and war. H. K. Lewis & Co.
London. 1919.

REED, R. A manic-depressive episode presenting a frank wish-
realization construction. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. n. No. 2. P. 111.
IBID. A manic-depressive attack presenting a reversion to infantilism
J. of Abn. Psych. Vol. XI. No. 6. P. 359.

RENTERGHEM, A. W. VAN. Freud and his school. J. of Abn. Psych.

Vol. IX. Nr. 6. P. 369. and Vol. X. No. 1. P. 46.

REYNOLDS, C. E. Mental conflicts and their physical homologues.

South Calif. Pract. 1915. Vol. XXX. Pp. 101—115.

RING, A. H. Psychoanalysis. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol U. No. 4. P. 390.
RIVERS, W. H. R. The repression of war experience. Proc. Royal Soc.
of. Med. Vol. XI. 1918. Pp. 1—7.

IBID. Why is the “Unconscious” unconscious? (A contribution to a
symposium). Brit. J. of. Psych. Vol. IX. Part 2. Oct. 1918.

IBID. Dreams and primitive culture. Proc. of The Brit. Psych. Soc.
Also publ: Univ. Press, Manchester 1918. Pp. 28. Soc. Jan.
26 th. 1918.

IBID. War neurosis and military training. Mental Hygiene. Vol. II
No. 4. Oct 1918.

IBID. The Freudian Concept of the censor. Proc. of the Brit. Psych.
Soc. Jan. 25 th. 1919.

IBID. Freud’s psychology of the unconscious. Lancet. June 16 th. 1917.
IBID. A case of claustrophobia. Lancet. Aug. 18th. 1917. P. 237.
ROBERTSON, J. I. A study in self-revelation. Glasgow Med. J.
Vol. XCI. New Series. N. IX. Feb. 1919.

OF THE RECENT PSYCHOANALYTICAL LITERATURE IN ENGLISH 81

(278) .

(279) .
(280;.
(281).
(282).

(283) .

(284) .

(285) .

(286) .

(287) .

(288) .

(289) .

(290) .

(291) .

(292) .

(293) .

(294) .

(295) .

(296) .

(297) .

(298) .

(299) .

ROBIE, W. F. Rational sex ethics. Rich. C. Badger. Boston. 1916.
Pp. 356.

ROSS, T. A. The prevention of relapse of hysterical symptoms.
Lancet. 1918. Oct. 19 th. P. 516,

SCHROEDER, T. The Wildebuch Saint —A study in the erotogenesis
of religion. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. I. No. 2. P. 129.

IBID. The erotogenetic interpretation of Religion. Journ. of Relig.
Psych. Jan. 1914.

IBID. Psychogenetics of androcratic evolution. Psychoanalyt. Rev.
Vol. II. No. 3. P. 277.

IBID. The psychologic aspect of free-association. Amer. J of Psych.
Vol. XXX. No. 3. July 1919.

SCRIPTURE, E. W. Psychoanalysis and correction of character Med.
Rec. LXXX. 859.

SEVERN, E. The psychology of behavior. Dodd, Mead & Co New
York. 1917. Pp. 349. ’

SHOCKLEY, F. M. Clinical cases exhibiting unconscious defense
mechanisms. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. III. No. 2. P. 141.

IBID. Role of homosexuality in genesis of paranoid conditions.
Pschoanalyt. Rev. Vol. I. No. 4. P. 431.

SINCLAIR, M. Symbolism, and sublimation. Med. Press and Circ.
Aug. 9 th. 1916, and Aug. 16th. 1916.

SINGER, H. D. Dynamic psychology and practice of medicine. The
J. of Nerv. and Ment. Dis. Vol. XLV. 1917. Pp. 324—336.

SOLOMON, M. A contribution to the analysis and interpretation of
dreams based on the instinct of self-preservation. Amer. J. of.
Insanity. July 1914.

IBID. A plea for a broader standpoint in psychoanalysis. Psychoanalyt.
Rev. Vol. II. No. 1. Jan. 1915.

IBID. Some remarks on the meaning of dreams. Med. Record
Jan. 31st. 1914.

IBID. On the analysis and interpretation of dreams based on various
motives and on the theory of psychoanalysis. J. of. Abn. Psych.
Vol. IX. Nos. 2-3. June—Sept. 1914.

IBID. A few dream analyses. J. of Abn. Psych. Vol. IX. No. 5. Dec, 1914.

SOMERVILLE, W. G. The psychology of hysteria. Amer. J. of Insanity.
Vol. LXXIII. No. 4. April 1917. P. 369.

STERN, A. The unconscious. Med. Press and Circ. July 17th. 1918.

IBID. Compulsion neurosis. New York Med. J. Vol. C. No. 10.
Sept. 5 th. 1914.

IBID. Night terrors. New York Med. J. Vol. Cl. No. 19. May 8 th 1915.

IBID. The indentities of peculiar traits and neuroses. New York Med.
J. Vol. CII. No. 16. Oct. 16 th. 1915.

REVIEW

(300) .

(301) .

(302) .

(303) .

(304) .

(305) .

(306) .

(307) .

(308) .

(309) .

(310) .

(311) .

(312) .

(313) .

(314) .

(315) .

(316) .

(317) .

(318) .

(319) .

(320) .

IBID. The functional neuroses. New York Med. J. Vol. CVT. No. 6.
Aug. 11th. 1917.

IBID. Day phantasies in a child. New York Med. J. Vol. CVIII.
No. 15. Oct. 12. 1918.

IBID. Neurotic manifestations in children. Med. Record. Vol. LXXXIX.
No. 9. Feb. 26. 1916.

STEVENS, M. Heredity and Self-conceit. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. IV.
No. 4. P. 424.

STODDART, W. H. B. The New psychiatry. Rev. Of Neur. and Psychi-
atry. May, June and July 1915.

TALMEY, B. S. Psychology of the faddist. New York Med. J. Vol. CIV.
No. 15. Oct. 7th. 1916.

TANNENBAUM, S. A. Some current misconceptions of psychoanalysis.

J. of Abn. Vol. XII. No. 6. P. 390.

IBID. “Your napkin is too little: let it alone” (A Freudian Commentary).

Studies in Philology. Vol. XV. No. 2. Apr. 1918.

IBID. Pollutions. Amer. J. of Urology. March 1916.

IBID. Shakespeare and the new psychology. The Dial of New York.
March 1916.

IBID. The art of dream interpretation. J. of Urology and Sexology.
Jan. 1919.

IBID. Psychanalysis. A reply to some objections. New York Med. J.
Feb. 7 th. 1914.

IBID. Psychoanalysis de-sexualized. Amer. Medicine. New Series.

Vol. X. No. 12. Dec. 1915. Pp. 910—913.

IBID. Logic and Anti-psychoanalysis. Amer. Medicine. New Series.

Vol. IX. No. 6. June 1914. Pp. 412—415.

IBID. A consideration of objections to psychoanalysis. Med. Record.

Feb. 21st. 1914.

TAYLOR, E. W. Suggestions regarding a modified psychoanalysis.

J. of Abn. Psych. Vol. XII. No. 6. P. 361.

TREADWAY, W. L. (with J. T. MacCurdy). Constructive delusions
J. of Abn. Psych. Vol. X. No. 3. P. 153.

TROLAND, L. T. Freudian psychology and psychical research. J. of
Abn. Psych. Vol. VIII. No. 6. P. 429.

TROTTER, W. Instincts of the herd in peace and war. T. Fisher Unwin.
London. 1916.

VIERECK, G. S. “Roosevelt” — A study in ambivalence. Jackson
Press. New York. Pp. 144.

WATSON, J. An analysis of some personal dreams. Proc. Amer. Soc.

for Psych. Research. Vol. VIII. 2nd. Aug. 1914.

WEINBERG, A. K. The dream of Jean Christophe. J. of Abn. Psych.
Vol. XIII. No. 1. P. 12.

(321).

OF THE RECENT PSYCHOANALYTICAL LITERATURE IN ENGLISH 83

(322) . IBID. Nephew and maternal uncle; A motive of early literature in

the light of Freudian psychology. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. V.
No. 4. P. 381.

(323) . WELLS, F. L. Mental adjustments. Appleton & Co., New York and

Lond. 1917. Pp. 320.

(324) . IBID. Mental regression. Its conception and types. Psych. Bull.

Oct. 1916. Pp. 445—492.

(325) . IBID. Mental adaptation. Mental Hygiene. Vol. I. No. 1. Pp. 60—68,

(326) . IBID. A summary of material on the topical community of primitive

and pathological symbols. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. IV. No. 1. P. 373.

(327) . WHITE, W. A. Mechanisms of character formation. The Macmillan Co.

New York. 1916. Pp. 342.

(328) . IBID. Principles of mental hygiene. (Introduction by S. E. Jelliffe).

The Macmillan Co. New York. 1916. Pp. 342.

(329) . IBID. Psychoanalytic tendencies. Amer. J. of Insanity. Vol. LXXIII.

No. 4. Pp. 583—595. April 1917.

(330) . IBID. The Moon myth in medicine. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. I.

No. 3. P. 421.

(331) . IBID. The unconscious. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. II. No. 1. P. 12.

(332) . IBID. Psychoanalytic parallels. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. II. Nr. 2. P. 1777.

(333) . IBID. Symbolism. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. IlL No. 1. P. 1.

(334) . IBID. Individuality and introversion. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. IV.

No. 1. P. 1.

(335) . IBID. The mechanism of transference. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. II.

No. 1. P. 1.

(336) . IBID. The autonomic functions and the personality. A critical review.

Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. VI. No. 1. P. 89.

(337) . IBID. Psychoanalysis and the practice of medicine. J. of The Amer.

Med, Assoc. 1914. Vol. LXII. P. 1036.

(338) . IBID. The mental hygiene of childhood. Nerv. and Ment. Dis Publ

Co. 1919.

(339) . WHOLEY, C. C. A psychosis presenting schizophrenic and Freudian

mechanisms with schematic clearness. Amer. J, of Insanity
Vol. LXXm. No. 4. Pp. 583-595.

(340) . IBID. Revelations of the unconscious in a toxic (alcoholic) psychosis.

Amer. J. of Insanity. Vol. LXXIV. No. 3. Pp. 437—444.

(341) . IBID. Psychoanalysis. J. of Amer. Med. Assoc. 1914. Vol. LXII. P. 1036.

(342) . WILLIAMS, T. A. A contrast in Psychoanalysis. Three cases. New

York Med. J. April 1914.

(343) . WOLF, A. The r6Ie of repression in forgetting. (Contribution to a

symposium.) Brit. J. of. Psych. Vol. VII. No. 2. Sept. 1914.

(344) . WRIGHT, M. The psychology of Freud and its relation to the psycho-

neuroses. Med. Magaz. 1914. Vol. XXIII. Pp. 137—151.

REVIEW

(345) .

(346) .

YOAKUM, C. S. (with M. C. Hill). Persistent complexes derived
through free association. Miss Z’s case. J. of Abn. Psych. Vol. XL
No. 4. P. 215.

IBID, (with M. C. Hill). Genetic antecedents of free association
materials. Miss Z’s case. J. of Abn. Psych. Vol. XL No. 6. P. 396.

(D*

( 2 ).

(3) .

(4) .

(5) .

( 6 ) .

(7) .

( 8 ) .
(9).

( 10 ).

( 11 ).

( 12 ).

(13) .

(14) .

(15) .

(16) .

TRANSLATIONS.

ADLER, A. The neurotic constitution. Author, transl. by B. Glueck
and J. E. Lind. Moffat Yard & Co., New York. 1917. P. 456.
BERTSCHINGER, H. Processes in recovery in schizophrenia. Transl.

by C. L. Allen. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. III. No. 2. P. 176.
BJERRE, P. The history and practice of psychoanalysis. Author, transl.

by E. N. Barrow. Richard C. Badger. Boston 1916. Pp. 294.
FERENCZI, S. Contributions to psychoanalysis. Author, transl. by
Ernest Jones, Richard C. Badger. Boston 1916. Pp. 288.

FREUD, S. On dreams. Transl. by M. D. Eder. Heinemann. London.
Pp. 109.

IBID. Delusion and dreams. (With an introduction by G. Stanley Hall.)

Transl. by H. M. Downey. Moffat, Yard & Co. 1917. Pp. 243.
IBID. Totem and Taboo. Author, transl. by A. A. Brill. Moffat, Yard
& Co. 1918. Pp. 265.

IBID. Wit and its relation to the unconscious. Author, transl. by
A. A. Brill. Fisher Unwin, London. 1916. Pp. 388.

JBID. Leonardo da Vinci. A psychosexual study of an infantile re¬
miniscence. Author, transl. by A. A. Brill. Moffat, Yard & Co.
New York, 1916. Pp. 130.

IBID. Psychopathology of everyday life. Author. Transl. by A. A. Brill.

1914. Fisher Unwin. London. Pp. 342.

IBID. Reflections on war and death. Author. Transl. by A. A. Brill.

Moffat, Yard & Co. New York. 1918. Pp. 72.

IBID. The history of the psychoanalytic movement. Nerv. and Mcnt.
Dis. Publ. Co. New York. Monograph Series. No. 25.1917. Pp. 57.
Author. Transl. by A. A. Brill.

HUG-HELLMUTH, H. VON. A study of the mental life of the child.
Transl. by J.J. Putnam and M. Stevens. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. V.
Nos. 1—4: Vol. VI. No. 1.

JUNG, C. G. Studies in word association. Author. Transl. by M. D.

Eder. Heinemann. London. 1918. Pp. 575.

IBID. Psychology of the unconscious. Author. Transl. by B. M. Hinkle.

Moffat, Yard & Co. New York. 1917. Pp. 449.

IBID. Collected papers on analytical psychology. Author. Transl. edited
by C. E. Long. 1916. Bailliere, Tindall & Cox. Lond. Pp. 566.

OF THE RECENT PSYCHOANALYTICAL LITERATURE IN ENGLISH 85

(17) . MAEDER, A. E. The dream problem. Author, transl. by F. M. Hallock

and S. E. Jelliffe. Nerv. and Ment. Dis. Publ. Co. New York. Mono¬
graph Series. No. 22. 1916.

(18) . PFISTER, O. Psychoanalysis and the study of children and youth.

Transl. by F. M. Smith. Amer. J. of Psych. Vol. XXVI. No. 1.
Jan. 1915. Pp. 130-141.

(19) . IBID. The psychoanalytic method. Author, transl. by C. R. Payne,

Moffat, Yard & Co. New York. 1917. Pp. 588.

(20) . RANK, O. (with H. Sachs.) The significance of psychoanalysis for the

. mental sciences. Author. Transl. by C. R. Payne. Psychoanalyt.
Rev. Vol. n. Nos. 3 and 4, Vol. HI. Nos. 1, 2 and 3.

(21) . IBID. The myth of the birth of the hero. Transl. by F. Robbins and S.

E. Jelliffe. J. of Nerv. and Ment. Dis. Publ. Co. New York.. Mono¬
graph Series. No. 18.

(22) . RICKLIN, F. Wish-fulfillment and symbolism in fairy tales. Author.

Trans, by W. A. White, The Nerv. and Ment. Dis. Publ. Co. New
York 1915. Monograph Series No. 21.

(23) . SADGER, J. Sleep walking and moon walking. Transl. by L. Brink.

Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. VI. Nos: 2 and 3. (To be continued.)

(24) . SILBERER, H. Problems of mysticism and its symbolism. Transl. by

S. E. Jelliffe. Moffat, Yard & Co. New York 1916. P. 449.

(25) . STEKEL, W. The technique of dream Interpretation. Transl. by J. E.

Lind. Psychoanalyt. Rev. Vol. IV. No. 1. P. 84.

(26) . IBID. Sleep, the will to sleep and insomnia. Transl. by S. A.

Tannenbaum. The Amer. J. of Urology and Sexology. Vol. XIV.
No. 9. Sept. 1918.

(27) . IBID. On suicide. Transl. by S. A. Tannenbaum. Amer. J. of Urology

and Sexology. August. 1918.

(28) . IBID. The psychology of kleptomania. Transl. by S. A. Tannenbaum.

Amer. J. of Urology. Feb. 1818.

(29) . IBID. Obsessions: their cause and treatment. Transl. by S. A.

Tannenbaum. Amer. J. of Urology. April 1918.

(30) . Some Freudian contributions to the paranoia problem. (A translated

digest of various articles from the pen of foreign authors.) By C. R.
Payne. Psychoanalytic Rev. Vol. I. Nos: 1—4. Vol. II. Nos: 1 and 2.

REVIEW

Those who have faith in the scientific truth of psycho-analytical principles,
and who see in their study and application a vast field for the general enhan¬
cing of human happiness directly and indirectly, will realize with rightful satis¬
faction that in England and America substantial progress has been achieved in
this psychological sphere during the past six years. In the latter country it has
been specially marked (reference to the Bibliography will show how great the
preponderance of American psycho-analytical literature has been as compared
with British) perhaps because of a greater aptitude there for adopting new
conceptions, though in Great Britain, undoubtedly, the investigation of neurotic
disease arising through war experiences has forced the medical profession to cast
away ^s useless old materialistic ideas and adopt psychological theories as a
more rational explanation of its pathological basis. Mostly through the medical
profession, psychologists have had to review their static conceptions with a
more critical eye, with the result that slowly but surely they are seeing that
their principles have in the past savoured too much of the armchair and have
lacked that essentially humanistic element which Freud has made such an im¬
portant factor. Great opposition though has continued to be evinced by many
neurologists, psychiatrists, and psychologists. Nevertheless it is interesting to
note that in much of the literature these opponents have penned, psycho-analytical
terms are by no means sparsely found, though doubtless they would extensively
rationalize their use. The concept of “repression” is freely spoken of, while the
importance of dream life has become more or less universally recognized by
those who have had dealings with war anxiety states. All this augurs well for
the future of psycho-analytic progress. That such eminent psychologists as Stanley
Hall and Putnam have so largely become adherents to these doctrines is grati¬
fying. In America many distinguished medical and psychological authorities
have devoted much energy to the dissemination of Freudian knowledge; the
names of Brill, Burrow, Clark, Coriat, Emerson, Frink, Glueck, Kempf, MacCurdy,
Obendorf, Stern, Tannenbaum, and White must be specially mentioned in this
connection. The American Journals contain much psycho-analytic work. The
Psychoanalytic Review is devoted entirely to such, and within its pages the
reader often finds material by writers the worth of whose contributions is un¬
disputed. Herein, too, appear abstracts from “Imago” and the “Zeitschrift fiir arzt-
liche Psychoanalyse”, which render it of still greater interest. The Journal of
Abnormal Psychology is another publication through which American and English
readers may learn of psycho-analytic theory and practice, while the late advent
of the Journal of Mental Hygiene, published by The National Comittee of Mental
Hygiene, is in full sympathy with psycho-analytic tenets and deals often with
social problems from this point of view. To America we are also indebted for
the translations of so many Continental works which have been of great value

OF THE RECENT PSYCHOANALYTICAL LITERATURE IN ENGLISH 87

in the propagation of Freudian ideas. In England the psycho-analytic work has
been mainly stimulated by the work of Ernest Jones who has a world wide
reputation and to whose enthusiasm and erudition many students owe much.
Psycho-analytical literature in English journals is largely conspicuous by its
absence, though the British Journal of Psychology has of late contained many
interesting articles of this nature.

L Pure Psycho-Analysis

The number of books devoted to the subject by American and British authors
is comparatively small and the great majority of the literature is to be found
in the many American journals. The main books in England dealing with
psycho-analysis are Ernest Jones, “Papers on Psycho-Analysis” (164), Bradby's
“Psycho-analysis and its place in life” (10), Nicoll’s “Dream Psychology” (225)»
and Trotter’s “Instincts of the Herd in Peace and War” (318). American authors
have been more prolific though many only deal indirectly with psycho-analytical
principles.

(a). General.

Generaf ps^<£o>>anaf^ticaf pnneipCes have been put forth in several works
apart from translations. A simple exposition of the subject is rendered by Coriat
(71) and Lay (196), the latter of whom is a secondary teacher of much experience
who has found psycho-analysis useful and undertakes to tell others its essentials
in his book which is an interesting manual for the beginner. White of Washington
writes in his-somewhat popular but very attractive style and deals thoroughly
(327) with the subject and orients the reader well. He is particularly happy in
his dealings with the Oedipus and Electra complexes in his chapter on “The
Family Romance”. In his other work — “The principles of mental hygiene” (328)
he applies many psycho-analytical principles to the domain of the feebleminded,
the insane, and problems connected with society. Brill has published a second
edition of his well-known book “Psychanalysis” (14) which though a useful
work is somewhat too condensed for the average reader to gain an adequate
insight into the Freudian principles involved. It is, of course, by no means an
easy matter to place before a student the bulk of psycho-analytical conceptions
within a comparatively small compass, but in the opinion of the reviewer this
object has been most fully attained by Frink in his “Morbid fears and compulsions”
(116) where he is most lucid, not diffuse, and leads up logically to the clinical
issues involved in the neuroses. In his endeavours, however, to clarify the
meaning of the term “sexual” as usfed in the Freudian sense he makes some
important mistakes. Bradby in her recent work on psycho-analysis (10) introduces
terms and conceptions which detract greatly from the scientific value of her
book, though her enthusiasm and writing may do much to dispel prejudice
among a certain class of readers. The bias of ethical ideas and morality has no
place in scientific psychology and one must deplore such statements as — “In

the unconscious are spiritual values.each has God in him as well as

Devil”. Her view that there is a fundamental, innate moral impulse in man
which may be imperfectly developed or repressed, and which she finds evidence
of in her analyses of dreams, requires no comment here. Nevertheless there is

REVIEW

worth in her aims and she has done well to include the relation of psycho¬
analysis to art, religion and biography, as well as to individual psychology.

One must refer here to several works of importance which either deal with
certain Freudian concepts or contain matter which is largely built up on psycho¬
analytical doctrines. In this category special place must be given to Holt’s
book “The Freudian wish and its place in ethics” (149). There is no mysticism
here. He is enthusiastic, says that the Freudian key is “the first key which
psychology ever had which fitted” and that Freud is making “comfortably
established professors look hopelessly incompetent”. For Holt a wish is ‘any
purpose or object for a course of action whether it is being merely entertained
by the mind or is being actually executed”. The wish depends on physical
motor attitude which goes over into action and conduct when the wish is
carried over into execution. Hence Freudian psychology is essentially dynamic.
This wish — of which he gives many interesting examples in Freudian stories
and interpretations — “becomes the unit of psychology, replacing the old unit
commonly called sensation”. For some reason he uses the term “suppression ,
instead of “repression” and only attacks human problems at a somewhat super¬
ficial level. He, too, does not give sufficient due to the emotional factor as a
dynamic agent and over-emphasizes the intellectual, which is curious when we
note the title of his book. Nevertheless the contents stimulate thought and the
ethical considerations brought forward are of undoubted value.

Those motivations of conduct which recent psycho-analytical investigations
have revealed are dealt with briefly by Putnam in his little work Human
Motives” (246). The doctrines of Freud are here left free from philosophical
conceptions and in essentials the author’s ideas are suggestive of those of Holt,
He finds that the conflict of our rational and emotional impulses resolves itself
into an interaction of two motives, the constructive and the adaptive. Psycho¬
analysis shows the presence of unconscious tendencies, which, if not properly
controlled and guided, often militate against natural aspirations and the possi¬
bilities of individual achievement.

There is some truth in the statement that in the study of repression, not
sufficient light has been thrown on the social and biological repressing forces.
Trotter in his classical work — “Instincts of the herd in peace and war” (318)
particularly deals with these factors and with their relationship to mental conflict.
He says that the Freudian school have made comparatively little use of the
broader aspects of biological reactions as found in the behaviour of animals. He
deals with social repressive influences and shows how man s mind is specially
sensitive to herd suggestion which renders the repressing forces so potent. Thus
a conflict is universally found between egoistic impulses on the one hand and
sensitiveness to herd suggestion on the other. Sensitiveness to the herd is thus
looked upon as necessary for true conflict. The normal mind is therefore far
from being psychologically healthy and repressions are at times of value
because of their social restraint though they are also the origination of our fears,
our weaknesses, and our subordination to tribal customs. Trotter s way of dealing
with these questions is very stimulating and undoubtedly gives a broader view
to many psycho-analytical principles.

Psycho-analytical concepts and mechanisms are dealt with generally in a
book by the psychologist Lyman Wells, viz: “Mental Adjustments (323) where

OF THE RECENT PSYCHOANALYTICAL LITERATURE IN ENGLISH 89

he covers a wide field and gives much information in an attractive way. Here
his chapter on “Balancing factors” is specially of value and one which should
be read by every intelligent layman. He says — “First, that men achieve
adaptation to life in proportion to their happiness in it; second, that happiness
consists in the balanced expenditure of energy for the realization of desires; and
third, that the underlying motive in voluntary human conduct is the pursuit of
a conscious happiness. Psycho-analytical work has shown more and more the great im¬
portance of the conception of mental regression as an explanation of many psycho-
pathological disturbances” (p. 226). Mainly on Freudian lines Wells (324) (325)
contributes an interesting study on this conception, though perhaps without
materially advancing the subject. He lays stress on the point that the great
factor in all regression is negation of effort and a turn towards the child state,
thus a return to protection and an atmosphere of safety. White in fact speaks
of this mainly as the ‘safety motive’ (328). Introversion is of course intimately
connected with this concept where thought is more or less satisfactorily sub¬
stituted for conduct. White (334) also deals with this subject which has become
of vast importance in psycho-pathology. Extroversion is a conception of much
more doubtful meaning and to a large extent is the natural human trend. Jung,
who coined the term, deals with this point at some length (Transl. 16), but
British and American authors have touched but little on the theme. Jung too in
English gives a lengthy dissertation on the theory of psycho-analysis (175). His
different standpoint from Freud’s is well known and need not be dilated upon here.

Though theory may be thoroughly learnt, its practical applications are by no
means easy and it is to be hoped that Jelliffe’s article on the technique of
psychoanalysis (155) will be the precursor of others. Transference is so subtle in
many ways and difficult for the non-experienced to handle that more literature
might have been devoted to this factor (154). Frink (116) discusses the question
in his book, but Ferenczi (Transl. 4) has done most original work here and
coins the word ‘introjection’ for the psychological mechanism involved.

As before stated, the great bulk of the English literature of any importance
emanates from the pen of Ernest Jones, who in his papers collected into book
form (164) covers most of the psycho-analytical ground, but the majority of his
writing presupposes some previous knowledge. Hart deals more popularly with
the broad issues involved (136) and Solomon who differs in many respects
from Freud pleads for a broader standpoint in psycho-analysis (291).

Anal-erotism either in reaction form, or substituted, sublimated form has with
late study been seen to take a very great share in character formation. Jones has
thrown much light on this subject (171). Psychologists, too, have been impressed
with his views on the repression theory in its relation to memory, for this
author has brought much evidence to bear to show that all defects in memory
are mainly dependent upon faulty reproduction (165) from associative pleasure-
pain principle (see p. 104). An interesting symposium on this question took place
at a British Psychological Congress, where the views of various psychologists
(205), (219), (240), (343) were duly set forth. We here again see how psycho¬
analytical principles are slowly but surely eating their way into and moulding
the old faculty psychology.

For long it has been seen that the great good that will ensue from psycho¬
analysis in the future will come about from a safeguarding of the child’s early

REVIEW

formative years, since according to Freud it is in the first five years of life that
the foundations of character are laid, later traits being but persistences or
transformations of dynamic forces existing at this period. The unconscious mental
life of the child with all the necessarily involved conflicts has become of prime
importance and to which study contributions have been made by Jones (170),
Eder (93), Lay (197), and Stern (301). It has been truly stated that not sufficient
guidance has been given on such a vital question, but this has been recently
supplied to some extent by Lay (197) and White’s latest work The Mental
Hygiene of Childhood. (338). The former’s work is somewhat too diffuse and
technical in parts for the average lay reader, but White strikes just the right
note and is always readable.

There is still a good deal of individual conception as to what the unconi^
scious involves and interesting views were given from different points of
view in a symposium on the question — “Why is the ‘Unconscious unconscious?
taken part in by Jones (173), Rivers (271) and Nicoll (224) and published later.
The last-named, who favours the ideas of Jung, regards the ‘unconscious’ as
a part of the mentality not yet fully adapted to reality, and believes it “contains
nascent thought — thought that has not yet been fashioned into the form that
is useful to consciousness”. He adopts a teleological view partly and herein
sees “the forces of progression as well as the forces of regression”. He sums
up as follows — “The ‘unconscious’ is unconscious because life is a process
of progressive evolution and requires to be closely adapted to reality if the
individual is to be successful. Therefore the progressive transmutations of
psychic energy are carried out at levels beneath consciousness, just as the trans¬
mutations of the embryo are carried out in the womb of the mother, and it is only the
comparatively adapted form that is born into waking life. Thus from this point
of view we must regard the unconscious as the inexhaustible source of our
psychic life, and not only as a cage containing strange and wild beasts”* In
some ways this idea savours of Myers’ ‘subliminal consciousness’ and can
only be described as more philosophical than scientific. Nicoll, too, interprets
Freud wrongly in more than one instance.

Rivers’ view (271) is more utilitarian and he holds that the unconscious is
no longer adapted to reality, though at some earlier period of development
it was so. He thinks that repression had taken place because the activity of
this functioning was becoming disadvantageous to the organism which
required a more modifiable guidance, and dwells on processes of dissociation
in the lower animals in support of his contention, as well as on supposed
similar phenomena in the sensory reactions worked out by Head and himself
which he regards as analogous. He therefore also regards the problem from
the evolutionary standpoint. Ernest Jones would term his view ‘hedonic’
and regards the unconscious as sometimes better adapted to reality than
consciousness and sometimes not. He would meet the question with the
answer that the ‘unconscious' is unconscious because of the inhibiting presence
of the affective factors grouped under the name ‘repression’. He would trace
the following order of events “First the growth of the utilitarian principle
which gradually comes to control and even in a large measure to supplant the
more primitive hedonic pleasure-pain principle. Later a change in affective
values, whereby what was originally pleasureable and which remains so in the

OF THE RECENT PSYCHOANALYTICAL LITERATURE IN ENGLISH 91

unconscious, becomes ‘displeasureable’ and highly distasteful to the more
rapidly developing conscious system, the one more in contact with external
reality; and it is at this point that the secondary conscious mentality has
recourse to the hedonic and non-utilitarian mechanism of repression, which
results in the constituting of the true unconscious.”

The British psychologist Carveth Read (259) has been stimulated by the
psycho-analytical atmosphere to ponder on the conception of the unconscious
and, though by no means a Freudian, he is to some extent imbibing some of
the principles and sees that the old psychology must broaden out and recon¬
struct many of its old ideas in the light of modern work. White in his
interesting and useful works (327) (328) introducing psycho-analysis defines the
unconscious in very general and wide terms and regards it simply as our
historical past. Though his definition is lacking in many ways and can be
adversely criticized, he tends to strike the right note for the more uninitiated.
He states that the unconscious “is that portion of the psyche which has been
built up and organized in the process of development and upon which reality
plays in the form of new and hitherto unreacted to situations, and in the
friction resulting strikes forth the spark of consciousness”. He likens the
unconscious to the tail of a kite which, while it drags down and holds back,
nevertheless steadies its flight and at once prevents it from dashing itself to
pieces by a sudden dart downwards and makes it possible for it even to reach
greater heights. Morton Prince’s views are well known from his papers in the
Journal of Abnormal Psychology which later formed the substance of his book
on “The Unconscious” (244). Though his views are by no means widely
accepted, the merit of the book undoubtedly lies in the wealth of observation
obtained from his great clinical experience. The contents are based on the
assumption that the “field of conscious states” contains (a) an inner form of
attention surrounded by (b) a marginal area of attention, external to which is
(c) an area of co-conscious ideas “not entering into conscious awareness”,
beyond which again lies (d) the region of unconscious processes comprising (1)
conserved dormant neural dispositions (the physiological basis of memory) and
(2) active neural (e. g. spinal) processes. He regards (c) and (d) as divisions
of the subconscious. It will be seen that all this has little correlation with
psycho-analytical conceptions, but, since in many directions Prince has worked
on such lines, his views on the unconscious are given. The Jungian note is
struck by the author of the last English work on psycho-analysis (10) and here
Bradby states that psycho-analysts have overlooked important factors in the
unconscious. Her objections are by no means new and one must deplore the
unscientific statements she makes — “They are too much inclined to interpret
the higher in terms of the lower, to explain the advanced by a reference to
the rudimentary. They have found man’s repressed appetites and the conflict
between conventional morality and sexual desire, but they have not yet devoted
equal attention 'to his higher interests which are also to be found in the
unconscious mind'— interests which man does not share with the animals —
to the longing after knowledge and beauty and power for their own sakes, and
the desire for moral goodness apart from any particular system of morality.
Since man became aware of his own aims these things have been recognized
as amongst the ruling passions of humanity and they are not sexuality,

REVIEW

important though sexuality may be.” This philosophical and religious element
should certainly not be allowed to creep into any scientific conception of the
unconscious, and we will leave criticism at that.

SymSof/sm is such an important factor in psycho-analytical work that
a correct insight into its meaning is vital. In White’s book on Character For¬
mation (327) symbolism is dealt with, but in a very general way. He shows
its relation to the unconscious and sexuality, speaks of its interpretation, phylo¬
genetic meaning and energic value. The special advantage in the course of
development that the symbol has, he says is due to its wide usefulness as a
carrier and transmuter of energy and also because it can be used as a vehicle
to transmit energy from a lower to a higher level. (327. p. 112) (333). Wells (323)
in discussing symbolic association only touches the fringe of the matter. Thus
the only important reference to the theory of symbolism is Jones* article (167)
where the question is scientifically and deeply entered into. He differentiates
the various meanings the word ‘symbol’ may connote and abstracts their
common attributes, commenting on these at some length. From the study of
the genesis of symbols he concludes that the touchstone of the psycho-analy¬
tical theory of symbolism is that only what is repressed is symbolized;
only what is repressed needs to be symbolized. In dealing with functional
symbolism he critically tears to pieces the conceptions of what he terms
the post-psycho-analytical school of writers — Adler, Jung, Silberer, Maeder,
Stekel, and their English followers Eder and Nicoll. He sums up when he
states that “all symbolism betokens a relative incapacity for either apprehension
or presentation, primarily the former; this may be either affective or intellectual
in origin, the first of these two factors being by far the most important. As a
result of this relative incapacity, the mind reverts to a simpler type of mental
process and the greater the incapacity the more primitive is the type of mental

process reverted to.For the same reason symbolism is always concrete

because concrete mental processes are both easier and more primitive than
any other. Most forms of symbolism therefore may be described as the auto¬
matic substituting of a concrete idea, characteristically in the form of its sensorial
image, for another idea which is more or less difficult of access, which may
be hidden or even quite unconscious, and which has one or more attributes in
common with the symbplising idea”. Every student of psycho-analysis should
read this original article.

Colours have become symbols to us, symbols of well nigh every emotion
and aspiration. Evarts (107) gives us an interesting study of this with a survey
of the symbolic meanings of colours in mythology, poetry, art, etc., in different
countries and peoples that is of great value from a psycho-analytic standpoint.
“The symbolism for colour has so many roots that it appears as if any colour
might symbolize anything, and yet if carefully studied it will be seen that the
symbolism takes fairly well-marked lines. Briefly, white is the colour of the
Godhead, of purity, of unity, of immortality; black is the colour of sin; red
that of passion and the creative forces; blue, of coldness, passivity, truth;
green, of activity or active reproduction; yellow, of religious aspiration arid
beneficience; purple, of controlled passion“. An analysis of colour symbolism
in a patient is added.

The symbol of the serpent is frequent enough in dreams and abnormal

OF THE RECENT PSYCHOANALYTICAL LITERATURE IN ENGLISH 93

•

mental symptoms and evidently the choice of such a symbol is not accidental.
Hassall devotes a monograph to this important symbol (139) and traces its
meaning in religions, where it has been given the qualities of wisdom,
guardianship and protection, paternity and transmigration, the command over
fertility and hostility, and has been worshipped because of these. He also shows
that mythology and folk-lore throw a flood of light upon this symbol which,
too, is so often sexual as demonstrated in the analyses of neurotic and psychotic
cases which he quotes. In the interpretation of dreams theriomorphic symbols
are specially frequent and of vast import. Jung suggests here the release of
repressed incestuous libido by transference to animal forms, for he says “The
theriomorphic symbols, in so far as they do not symbolize merely the libido in
general, have a tendency to represent father and mother. . . father by a bull,
mother by a cow”. The relation of such symbols to primitive thought, dreams,
neurotic disease, etc., has been discursed by Jelliffe and Brink. (157). The
symbolism of primitive races and sex worship is discussed by Sanger Brown,
where a parallel is drawn between the history of the sex worship (30) in the
collective mind of the race and the influence of the sex motive in the life of
the normal individual. Little light, if any, is here thrown on symbolism itself.
Riklin’s work on “Wishfulfillment and symbolism in fairy tales” (Transl. 22) and
Silberer’s “Problems of mysticism and its symbolism” (Transl. 24) have both
been translated and are interesting in these wider spheres.

The literature relating to dreams is by no means extensive. The mechanisms
of dream work and the interpretations of dreams is dealt with by Jones (164),
Frink (116), and Brill (14) in their works. Coriat devotes a small volume (75)
to the meaning of dreams without adding any specially new matter, and Nicoll
has published a small work (225) where he mainly adopts Jung’s theory of
interpretation and regards the dream as largely “constructive” and teleological.
Eder has translated Freud’s small book on dreams (Transl. 5). Small literary
contributions in Journals have of course appeared, mainly on Freudian lines.
Though some authors take some exceptions to the Freudian interpretation, no
serious upsetting of the psycho-analytic theory has been formulated (82) (83)
(120) (239) (248) (310). Solomon has contributed a good deal on dreams, but
is much opposed to sexual factors therein and endeavours to find different
basic factors (290) (291) (293) (294). Hyslopp (151) and Watson (320) give
analyses of many personal dreams and Kimmins states some interesting findings
in children’s dreams (189), which however are merely confirmatory of our
previous ideas.

Though, as has already been stated, war medical experiences have given
such a fillip to the psychogenic factor in disease being recognized, and the
dreams of soldiers suffering from anxiety neuroses more especially have brought
such to the notice of their medical officers, little has been written about dreams
in connection with war disorders. Culpin briefly writes on the subject (83) and
MacCurdy touches on the topic in his “War Neuroses” (207). Little work has
been done in the interpretation of dreams in lower races of mankind, but Lind
devotes an interesting article on the dream as a wish-fulfillment in the Negro
(201). Coriat writes on hermaphroditic dreams (80). Psycho-analytic investigations
have shown that the best evidence of bisexuality in human beings is furnished
by the dreams of conscious or unconscious homosexuality. Coriat discusses and

REVIEW

•

quotes dreams which are essentially bisexual in their blurrings or blendings, a
sort of dream condensation, in either a symbolized or literal form. Where
unconscious homosexuality may occur as in certain paranoid states or in the
compulsion or anxiety neuroses, this type of dream has been found. This author
thinks that psycho-analysis can actually change the unconscious bisexual
tendency of man, in the same way that it can raise our primitive unconscious
traits to a higher level. He regards this type of dream as merely a transitional
product in the unconscious of homosexual individuals, although it must be
admitted that such dreams are an evidence of the bisexuality of the entire
human consciousness. Crenshaw would make a special class of retaliation
dreams’ (81) which though allied in function to the dreams of successful
competition mentioned by Freud, he thinks are more or less distinct and
deserve some special consideration. He quotes spite dreams in support of his
contention. ‘Night terrors* though touched on in some works, arc only specially
dealt with by Stern (298). It is established that the intense morbid dread and
apprehension are due to the fear of underlying desires and impulses becoming
conscious, since these are contrary to the personality.

In the analysis of patients where no dream life is manifested, the useful
method of getting the subject artificially to create supposed dreams has been
found to be very successful in thus getting at buried complexes. Brill (13)
shows how the unconscious factors work in much the same way as in ordinary
dreams and he traces the similarity to the factors met with in pathological lying.
Mention here must specially be made of an excellent study of dreams from a
wider standpoint by Rivers in his monograph “Dreams and Primitive Culture”.
(272). His purpose here has been first “to consider the psychological mechanism
by means of which the dream is produced and then to compare this mechanism
with the psychological characters of the social behaviour of those rude peoples
who are our nearest representatives of the early stages of human progress”.
After describing the mechanisms of the dream-work. Rivers proceeds to show
the existence of these same processes in the imagery, magical and social
customs, dramatic and pictorial art, and in the general culture of various
primitive peoples. The book is pregnant with interest in its attempt to demon¬
strate parallels between the psychology of dreams and that of primitive man.

As ever, discussion as to the prevalence and importance of the sexuaC
jactor in psycho-anafyticaC theories has been rampant and opponents of psycho¬
analysis ha eagerly pointed to the widely accepted doctrine that the
war neuroses centred round a self-preservation complex, as a confirmation
of their previous contention. Nevertheless all serious investigation has largely
helped to establish the validity of Freud’s sexual theory, more especially
from analytical studies of abnormal mental states. Havelock Ellis seems now to
find less difference with Freud (97) as his latest contribution (98) plainly shows.
There are many, however, still who regard the term ‘sexual’ (denoting the large
group of phenomena to which Freud applies it) as not particularly happy. Frink
(116) has suggested and adopted the word ‘holophilic’, from 6 X 05 , whole, and
qjtX^o), love, thus meaning all kinds of sexual or love phenomena, which he
thinks would be a convenient synonym for the word sexual in Freud’s sense,
and its judicious use would serve to avoid some possible misunderstandings.
This hardly appeals to the reviewer as any advance.

OF THE RECENT PSYCHOANALYTICAL LITERATURE IN ENGLISH 95

The general psycho-analytical theory of sex is described in the works of Jones
(164), Brill (14), Frink (116), and White (327), while Robie in a small work
(278) is superficially imbued with some of its ideas. The conflicts of childhood
in this realm is adequately dealt with by Jones (170), Lay (197), Eder (93),
and White (338). Attention, too, should here be drawn to the translated works
of Hug-Hellmuth (Transl. 13) and Pfister (Transl. 18). The former though
speculates far too freely and makes such exaggerated deductions from sm^ll
premises that only tend to militate against the scientific acceptance of psycho¬
analysis. For instance, this author boldly states that it is quite likely that sexual
precocity may be brought about in the child through a highly developed skin
and muscle erotism developed from disturbance in utero by the coitus of
parents. Pfister’s work is the more valuable as his primary interests radiate
from the points of view of a pastor und pedagogue, his cases therefore being
largely drawn from among school children and young adults. He therein finds
sexual conflict as the main basis for mental deviations from health. Nothing
has been written which seriously in any way invalidates Freud’s theory of the
Oedipus and Electra complexes. Burrow has endeavoured to show the origin
of Incest-Awe (36), though his reasoning seems by no means patent. Frazer,
as well as others have regarded the origin of incest as a mystery but Burrow
believes this biological phenomenon as not beyond the range of comprehension.
He states that there is no incest but thinking makes it so, and describes incest
revolt as “The conflict embodied in the opposition between love as aspiration
and life on the one hand and sex as covetousness and self on the other”. In
his interpretation “the incest-awe is the subjective reaction resulting from an
affront to an inherent psycho-biological principle of unity. It is the revulsion
due to the impact of an organic contradiction”. This verbiage and his wordy
support seems in no way convincing. Federn contributes an article on the
infantile roots of masochism (113), while mention must be made of Ferenezi’s
(Transl. 4) addition to our ideas of hypnotic suggestion which he traces to the
masochistic component of sexuality. Much work has been done in showing how
the early fixations and exaggerations of early sexual components will mould the
character for after life and Jones (171) deals in a highly interesting way with
anal-erotic character traits. He has greatly expanded the previous work of Freud
on this subject and carries the well recognized triad of characteristics —
economy, obstinacy and neatness — still further.

Of late years Bomosexuafity has been found through analyses to be a
much more important factor in the human psyche than was ever dreamt of.
Its influences in society generally, in the army and especially in periods of
war (172) (260) (262) (264) apart from its import in ibe production of abnormal
mental states, render its study specially needful. Burrow’s monograph (39) on
the genesis and meaning of homosexuality is the more welcome. The psycho¬
analytical idea has been that homosexuality was based upon the two com¬
ponents of the mother complex and narcissism. The individual rids himself of
the mother image as object by identifying himself with the mother and re¬
placing her with his own person as the sexual object. Later through an
association of similarity the object is extended to include other persons of a
sex like his own. Homosexuality has also been at times explained by the
adoption of the same sex as a refuge from the opposite sex. Burrow lays great

REVIEW

stress on the principle of original unity or identity of the offspring with the
mother and regards this as having great significance m later rnental develop¬
ment upon the determination of homosexuality and holds the opinion that auto¬
erotism itself is the psychological correlate of mater-erotism or of primary
identification with the mother. This auto-erotism being the love of
body and the love of that sex to which one’s body belongs is ^ ‘

sexuality. Burrow cannot therefore accept Sadger's view that
for the mother is a factor or that an intermediate narcissism is needed and m
the same way denies that in the female homosexuality has any basis in the
repression of a father-ideal. These latter mechanisms he regards as only secondary
In the production of a neurosis. Ferenczi in an article on ‘‘The nosology of
Male Homosexuality” (Transl. 4) follows Freud and Sadger but
added light on the question. The relation of homosexuality mention

and psychoses will be dealt with elsewhere. One must not omit to mention
the advent of a distinctly welcome work by Menzies (217) on that mjh jn*®'
understood question of onanism (which term the author points ou is not strict^
speaking synonymous with masturbation). In this book “Auto-erotic phenomena
L Lolfscence” an introduction is given on psycho-analysis in a few pages
and his treatment of the psychology of masturbation does "'“^h to clarify
ideas usually held The popular ignorance that exists on such a vitai subject
even aTiIgst medi^^^ men is deplorable and here we have a small volume
which is accessible to the general public and from ^hich valuaWe knowledge
can be gained. In his preface Menzies states “It aims at collecting and pre
senting the results obtained and recorded by the leaders of the analytical schoo
orclinical psychology in special reference to a matter of intima e indiv dual
concern both do adolescents and those charged with their care and educatio .

II, Clinical Psydio^Analysis

A. Pathology

CV Generat 7keory

As previously stated, the experience of the late war greatly stimulated
the pathological study of mental disorders, so that the psychogenic factor has
become widely accepted where hitherto it was almost an unknown quantity. I is
indeed a sign of the times in England when the President of the Neurolog c
Section of the Royal Society of Medicine, Aldren Turner, takes as his subject
for his Presidential address “The psychogenic factor in nervous disease and
this he has just done. During the past six years no important psycho-analytica
principle has been demonstrated as untenable, and further investigation and
Ldy have linked up the various correlated factors m the

psychotic disease, biology, anthropology, and mythology (15) (74) (85) (12 )
(156) (202). In the light of modern psychological knowledge Frazers Goldet^
Bough” takes on a much enhanced value and attraction. The theories of genera
pathology will be found well stated in the works of Brill (14), Frink (116), an
Jones (164). Time has shown that the various so-called

never sharply divided and that clear cut clinical pictures must seldorn be
expected. The biogenetic psychoses are seen to be curiously inter-related (16 )•
The theory of unconscious defense in the psychological mechanisms seen has

OF THE RECENT PSYCHOANALYTICAL LITERATURE IN ENGLISH 97

been much confirmed (286) and our previous ideas with regard to regression
(226) (324), and introversion (334) distinctly clarified. In the light of adult work
child life has been more studied and their conflicts appreciated (170) (338) and
so their abnormal mental manifestations far better understood (42) (72) (301).
The child's relation in early life to the parents and home circle which Freud
laid stress on, has been found to be full of truth, so that *the family romance’
(327) has been shown for various reasons to be provocative of later mental
disturbance (99) (193). The significance of the grandfather (164 p. 652) and
the relationship of nephew and maternal uncle (322) have also been dwelt upon,
and mark progress. In general psychiatry our advance of knowledge through
psycho-analysis has been marked (43) (44) (164) (209) (304) and insight largely
gained into the inherent meaning and purpose of delusions and other symptoms
(210) (316) (85). Homosexual factors have been found to be of great importance
in psychopathology, since much mental conflict is bound to arise because of
the intense resistance mankind shows to the awareness of such a complex.
Homosexuality is by no means the simple problem that was once thought and
it is found to be intimate y connected with other pathological factors such as
excessive alcohol, narcotic drugs, exaggerated narcissism, introversion and
regression (39) (50). Though the social question of alcohol has been specially
prominent through war legislation, the psychology involved is seldom if ever
considered in this respect. The psycho-analytical study of alcoholism has borne
much fruit and we now see more plainly than ever its uses in psychic defense,
its great compensations, and how it inhibits the later acquired characteristics,
aids mental regression and tends to destroy sublimation. Though much is
referred to in clinical articles, I can only trace one monograph on the subject
by Clark (67) who deals interestingly with it from a psycho-analytic point of
view. He very wisely says “At one time alcohol may serve as a paralyzant
to the repressing forces of social customs and make an otherwise difficult social
grouping free and natural. At another, it may furnish an extended pleasure
wand to reach a goal or state of rapport not tangible to the foreshortened grasp
of an individual who lacks the capacity to create a proper degree of self-produced
pleasure; while at another time it may make easy for free egress the deeper
and illy adjusted unconscious motives”. He, too, tends to think that the prohi¬
bition of alcohol would only provide another refuge into other retreats of
nervous ills and here agrees with Ferenczi (Transl. 4. p. 139). It is pointed
out how the conscious reasons given for drinking are only rationalizations and
the real reasons are due to unconscious motivation. The relation of alcohol
to the psychological mechanism of projection, homosexuality, fear and suicide
are dealt with, while atavistic tendencies and mythological factors are also
spoken of. The article is of considerable value.

One must not conclude the subject under this heading without drawing
attention to the literature devoted to Adler’s theory of organic inferiority and
its psychical compensation. Adler’s work on the neurotic constitution has been
translated (Transl. 1) and represents the great schism led by the author, who
substitutes the horror of inferiority, the ambition to do something and be of
importance in the world, for the sex theory of Freud. The previous irreconcilable
differences between the functionalists and the organicists find in Adler’s theories
the first hopeful sign of a rapprochement, as White points out (336). Some

REVIEW

critical articles have been devoted to Adler’s work (37) (125). Another effort
to correlate psychological symptoms with definite physiological and anatomical
data is made by Kempf in his work on “The autonomic functions and the
personality’’ (188) and of which White has made a critical review (336). Kempf’s
thesis is that the autonomic system registers the organic needs of the organism,
the psychological aspects of which are the affects. As White puts it, “In phy¬
siological terms conflict represents the strivings of the cravings of the parts of
the organism for the control of the final common (projicient) motor path for
adjustment. Fixation, expressed in similar physiological terms is the result of
conditioning the autonomic reflex, but the subject of repression is most illuminated
by this physiological view-point. The energy of the repressed affects is bound
up in certain visceral and postural tensions and the affects are the psychological
reverberations, so to speak, of the autonomic conditioned visceral and postural
tonicities which thus become the physiological aspects of the emotions, more
specifically of the unconscious.” Kempf’s monograph should certainly be closely
studied by all psycho-analysts.

A few articles appear on the psychopathology of everyday life confirming
Freud’s work. (117) (118) (218) (229).

C2J Spectaf Disorders

The psychoneuroses are amply dealt with in the books by Brill (14), Frink
(116) and Jones (164). Frink’s treatment of this subject is particularly suitable
to those who find some difficulty in understanding psycho-analytical mechanisms
and theories, and his lengthy case examples with analyses are specially helpful.
His psycho-analytic study of a severe case of compulsion neurosis embodied in
his book was previously published in the Psychoanalytic Review (119). Jones’
clinical studies in his work cover most of the ground. The psycho-analytic

literature during the past six years has demonstrated no departure of any worth
from previous conceptions, but greater insight has been gained as a whole into
the psychological mechanisms underlying ps^cHoneurotic disorders. Jones’ paper
on Morbid Anxiety (164 p. 474) is specially valuable from an historical and
pathological point of view; he believes that this anxiety depends not only
upon ungratified sexuality but lays stress upon the factor of the fear of desires
incompatible with' the ego-ideal, which factor, too, is the cause of night

terrors (298) and nightmares. The anxiety neurosis is not now considered as
commonly existing in a pure form but as a single symptom of anxiety hysteria,
the latter being the wider conception (164 p. 507). Though the alternations of

the affects of love and hate for long have been recognized as being the predo¬

minating influence in the development of the obsessional neurosis, the psycho¬
genesis of these affects has been put on a firmer basis, and anal-erotism —
which is extending its import in modern psychopathology—is also now seen to
play a prominent part in the production of this psychoneurosis (164 p. 540).
Many disorders of children have been looked upon with a more psychological
eye with consequent change and betterment in treatment. (42) (298) (302).
Psychosexual impotence in the light of modern knowledge has become better
understood and therefore more liable to cure (168) (Transl. 4 p. 9). The psychic
element has been recognized in torticollis (57) (62) (63), speech inhibition and
stammering (9) (73). Coriat (73) looks upon the psychogenesis of stammering

OF THE RECENT PSYCHOANALYTICAL LITERATURE IN ENGLISH 99

as one of the protean forms of an anxiety neurosis or anxiety hysteria, and
regards as the chief mechanism in its production the attempt to repress from
consciousness into the unconscious certain trends of thought or emotion, usually
of a sexual nature; in this he has Stekel’s support. Clark (57) (62) (63) states
that in all cases of mental torticollis he found that the condition was a defense
mechanism, a turning away from an adult adaptation and further analysis showed
that the type of movement was even more dynamic than a regressive one alone.
In psycho-analytic phraseology his cases were all muscularly auto-erotic and
evinced a reversion or regression to a type of movement that had the deepest
pleasureable content in the infantile life. As he says, we do not yet know why
this particular type of individual uses a torticollis rather than any other
regression and infantile mechanism. Tics, too, are often, if not always, found
to be psychoneurotic, though little literature exists on the subject (227). Little
too has been said on the condition known as mental infantilism, which is
usually hysterical in character. Clark devotes one article (64) to the subject,
while Stanford Read speaks of some cases he met with in his war work (260).
Any other work done on the psychoneuroses calls for no special mention here
but Evans reports a case showing psoriasis as an hysterical conversion sym¬
bolization (105). Under the heading of war disorders the psychoneuroses will
be dealt with again.

The work on the pathogenesis of Epifepsy marks a special advance in psycho¬
analytical investigations. Though psychopathological contributions have been
made by Ames and MacRobert (1) (215), MacCurdy (212) (213), Jelliffe (162),
Jones (164 p. 455), and Stanford Read (261) (264), the work and writings of
Clark are the most productive and fruitful (51) (52) (53) (54) (55) (56) (65)
(66). Hitherto the study of epilepsy has been almost solely confined to the
‘fit’ which really is the least essential factor while the mentality of the
sufferer has received no attention. Clark summarizes his results of study when
he states that there is a more or less definite constitutional make-up in the
epileptic which accounts largely for the so-called predisposition to the disease.
The essential defects are egocentricity, supersensitiveness, emotional poverty
and an inherent defect of adaptability to normal life. The make-up is accentuated
by the further advance of the disease only when seizures develop and epileptic
deterioration has little if any relationship with these seizures. The precipitating
factors that tend to / bring about epileptic reactions are types of stress and
annoyance, causing a loss of spontaneous interest and an intensive regression
to. day-dreaming, lethargies and somnolence. The attack occurs when tension
becomes very severe and may be looked upon psychologically as an intense
reaction away from the intolerable irritation, a regression to a primitive
mentality comparable to that of infancy or intra-uterine life. Treatment would
therefore be directed to the early overcoming of the defective instincts by
training and education, and later by giving the patient a spontaneous outlet
for his keen individualistic desires, and thus adapt himself to a healthy
environment. Clark thus shows how emotional and mental dilapidation may be
restored, great improvement in the convulsive symptoms take place, with a
more or less permanent arrest of the disorder in not a few cases. Clark’s study
of the mental content of the epileptic made while in twilight states is specially
helpful and his charts for recording the various daily mental states in relationship

7 *

100

REVIEW

to the epileptic reactions show how thoroughly and scientifically his investigations
have been carried out. No neurologist can afford to leave this work of Clark’s
unstudied. MacCurdy has progressed somewhat on the same lines and his
clinical study of epileptic deterioration (212) is well worth reading. He regards
the grand maf attack as a sudden reaction of the same type as the chronic
one of deterioration and he cannot accept the attempt of Clark and Ferenczi
to account for the convulsive fit on Freudian lines as a symbolic outlet for
unconscious wishes. Stanford Read (261) (264) has given some analyses of
epileptoid cases where he shows that the attacks had intimate relationship with
repressed affects. Jones contributes an interesting article (164 p. 455) on the
mental characteristics of chronic epilepsy and herein he dwells largely on the
abnormal sexuality that is found. He states that the sexual activities of chronic
epileptics are often turbulent and perverse and manifest a marked infantilism,
and that the mental features become much more intelligible when they are
correlated with the various sexual processes.

Two other subjects of psycho-analytic interest have been contributed to.
A study of pollutions is made by Tannenbaum (308) in a brief article wherein
he shows that a repressed sexual complex is the important aetiological factor.
Somnambulism is an interesting subject upon which only psycho-analysis has
thrown any light. Hitherto it has simply been explained as a morbid condition
excited during sleep and due to an unknown and abnormal cerebral activity.
Grimberg (130) gives briefly the history and interpretation of one of Sadger’s
cases where it appeared from psycho-analysis that the subconscious element
was the desire for the mother and sexual satisfaction with the mother. The
pathology of masturbation has been hitherto sadly cloaked in ignorance.
Menzies deals with this (217) and the sources of the masturbatic impulses are
well traced out from the psychogenetic standpoint.

In psgdiatrg though the psycho-analytical school have mainly devoted
their attention to the many problems of individual psychology, certain general
conceptions of a nosological character have gradually crystallised out from their
work and this is done by Jones in his article on “The inter-relations of the
biogenetic psychoses” (164 p. 466). Here light is thrown on the distinctions
and inter-relations between several of the individual psychoses and on the
relation of the neuroses to the psychoses in general. The unconscious psycho-
genetic mechanisms* in dementia praecox are referred to and the manifestations
representing an introversion of interest accompanying a regression of mental
Processes towards a more infantile type — the ‘autism’ of Bleuler. The close
connection between pure paranoia, dementia paranoides, and paraphrenia, each
representing an increasing regression towards more and more primitive stages
of ontogenetic development is pointed out, while the fundamental cause of the
differences between the neuroses and psychoses is thought to be that the intro¬
version or turning away of interest from the outer world, which is the most
characteristic feature of both, has proceded to a further degree in the case
of the .psychoses, carrying with it a loss, absolute or relative, of the ‘feeling
for reality’. This distinction however between the two groups is less sharp
than is usually thought, and the intimate psychological study of cases shows that
differentiation is often very difficult and may be impossible except through
psycho-analysis. Jones also points out that psychogenetic epileptiform fits occur

OF THE RECENT PSYCHOANALYTICAL LITERATURE IN ENGLISH 101

and that the obsessional neurosis may at times be exceedingly difficult to
distinguish from paranoid conditions. Doubts regarding the status of manic-
depressive insanity are dwelt upon, and how various psychiatrists differ from
each other in their conceptions of this diagnosis; Brill (14) has shown that
cases occur, clinically indistinguishable from manic-depressive insanity, but
which prove to be of the nature of anxiety hysteria on psycho-analysis. Modern
knowledge, therefore, through psycho-analysis tends to show that we have to
deal in these different diseases only with various types of reaction to a
fundamentally allied group of difficulties — namely, intrapsychical conflicts of
a biological nature.

Apart from some of the contents of Jones’ (164) and Brill’s (14) books comp¬
aratively little literary matter has been devoted to any problems of dementia
praecox, Osnato (236) gives a critical review of the various pathological
theories of this disease and shows a leaning towards the psychogenic ideas of
the psycho-analytical school. He strongly repudiates Adler’s views and believes
that the only method available is to apply the therapeutic test to the principles
laid down by psycho-analysts. Evarts mainly deals with this disease in an
article on the psychoses of the coloured races (106) where he comes to the
conclusion that the products of the unconscious in the insane of the coloured
race are influenced not only by the fact that these patients are but a few
generations removed from an earlier world, but they are also expressions of the
actual beliefs and practices of their everyday lives; that is they are ontogenetic
as well as phylogenetic in origin. Karpas devotes an article to dementia praecox
(181) and Wholey contributes a case of a psychosis presenting schizophrenic and
Freudian mechanisms with schematic clearness (339). Greenacre gives a super¬
ficial account (129) of the content of the schizophrenic characteristics occuring
in affective disorders. The sexual factor has long been recognized as of great
pathological import in dementia praecox and Hassall devotes a valuable article
to this theme. After a short psycho-analytical discourse on sexuality he traces
its relations to the various signs and symptoms commonly seen in a praecox
case, i. e. the sublimation into religious feeling and symbols, onanism, feeling
of guilt, distorted incestuous desires in delusions, hallucinations and dreams,
homosexuality, identification, symbolic acts, etc. Kempf gives an analysis of a
case of dementia praecox (187) and remarks in conclusion that every functional
psychosis or psychoneurosis is at least a biological maladaptation to the
repressive influence of the individual’s intimate associates, and that this influence
is usually unknowingly and innocently exercised as an implication of the
pursuit of selfish interests. This is evidently rather a wide and sweeping
generalization from the analysis of the one case he presents and one would
certainly doubt that a patient’s intimate associates were so solely the repressive
fons et origo’, though of course always a factor to be dealt with. The main,
bulk of the article is devoted to treatment and will be referred to again under
that heading.

What work has been done in manic-depressive insanity though meagre,
has only tended to confirm psycho-analytical theories. Jones (164) and Brill
both touch the subject and some interesting analyses of cases have also
been published. Reed reports a case (266) where a manic-depressive presented
a reversion to infantilism as a flight from reality. He states that the patient

102

REVIEW

after recovery was more nearly a mentally normal person than she had ever
been before and he wonders whether this could be accounted for by the fact
that her psychosis gave her the opportunity for a free catharsis and expression
in acts or words of practically a life-time of unconscious or repressed wishes
and impulses. This author contributes another case (265) in which he could
trace the wish-realization construction. During the patient’s depressed phase his
thoughts returned to a love fancy, forgotten or scarcely thought of for twenty
years. With this memory as a nucleus she constructed a systematized wish-
realization phantasy involving a change in her personal appearance, wealth, the
return to life of her father and mother, the marriage of her sister, good position
for her nephews, union in marriage with the object of her early fancy, his accession
to the Presidency of the United States, travel, high position, and children.

Freudian mechanisms in a manic-like state are demonstrated by MacCurdy
(208) and Dooley in an interesting analysis (88) shows well-marked regressive
stages and concludes that cases of the manic-depressive type of reaction may
have the same complex of causes, the core of which is failure at successive
points of psychosexual development, that is found to underly the praecox
group and the hysterias. Hoch has contributed also in his study of the benign
psychoses (148) and Chapman deals with the aetiology of anxious depressions (49).

One very special advance made through Freud is our conception of
varanoia and paranoid states, and this has been amply confirmed and
extended. Payne’s translations of the contributions of foreign authors (Transl.
30) is the best literature that exists on the subject in the English language,
but White and Jelliffe also dilate on these psycho-analytic conceptions in
their text book of Neurology and Psychiatry (153). Jones (164) and Brill
(14) in their books deal with the point as well. The former did good service
in translating Ferenczi’s “Contributions to Psycho-Analysis” wherein Freud’s
conception of the homosexual origin of paranoia is well supported. (Transl. 4).
Shockley has given us an historical review of the growth of Freud’s views and
discusses the projection mechanisms involved (287). That the factor of latent
homosexuality is more to be reckoned with in the production of neurotic and
psychotic manifestations is certainly being forced upon us. Read tends to confirm
this in his war psychiatric studies (260) (262) (264) to be mentioned later.

With regard to the refation Between afcoBoC and mentaf disease, and
paranoid states, modern psychiatrists, recognizing the importance of the
psychogenic factor, agree that the alcohol only acts in a contributory way,
and that it is by no means the real Tons et origo’ of the abnormal mental
state except in those cases where a toxic element is obviously present. Quite
lately Clark has given us a psychological study of some alcoholics (67);
this has already been referred to under the heading of “General Theory”.
Wholey (340) gives an analysis of an alcoholic psychosis revealing unconscious
complexes. He says “the psychosis presents a culminating chapter in a lifelong
conflict in which inherent moral, or ethical forces, have been struggling for
supremacy, and it is probable that the patient’s alcohol has been but a
commanding instrument which has served to make possible the repressions
characterizing his career”. He believes, too, that the psychotic episode would
eventuate in the establishment of the individual upon a saner and more
adequately balanced plane of activity. We see, therefore, that here alcohol has

OF THE RECENT PSYCHOANALYTICAL LITERATURE IN ENGLISH 103

not been a destructive element. Wholey introduces a point in his article
concerning alcoholism and suicide which the reviewer quite fails to understand
when the author says — “The regularity with which we find the alcoholic
attempting suicide by throat laceration, lends confirmation to the theory that
a ‘birth phantasy’ determines the manner of suicide. Such an interpretation
of the psychology of the alcoholic is in keeping with the theory of his homo¬
sexual fixation”. No less an authority than White supports this idea and it is
therefore regrettable that no explanation of this bald statement is forthcoming.
Further references to alcohol and mental disease are found in some war
literature (260) (262) (264).

Very little work has been done on the psydjogenic deCiria but Levin
devotes an article to this subject (199). It must not be forgotten that
Glueck at Sing Sing Prison in New York has done most valuable work which
will be mainly alluded to under another heading, but in his work on Forensic
Psychiatry (124) he speaks of prison psychoses and how many of the stuporous
states met with in prison are defense reactions and psychic negation of the
situation and environment. Elsewhere he demonstrates the defense reactions of
the malingerer (123).

B. Treatment

Psycho-analytic treatment is fairly amply discussed in the works of Jones
(164), Brill (14), and Frink (116), the last named giving long histories and
analyses of a case of anxiety hysteria and compulsion neurosis to act as para¬
digms. Jelliffe has written a series of articles entitled “The Technique of Psycho-
Analysis’^ (155), (159), which, unfortunately, are very discursive and ill-informed. He
thinks that the sex of the analyst may be so important a factor that great care
should be exercised in following the course of treatment with a change of
analyst according to sex. In this category he refers to male cases with a possible
unconscious homosexual tendency whom he thinks would respond better, at
least at the beginning, to a woman. The compulsive neurotic, too, may because
of the strong aggressive tendencies, improve more at a certain stage in the
hands of a woman. Those with a special conscious defense of shyness, and the
excitable hysteric and manic may also at times be treated better by a change of
sex in the analyst. Gosline points out (128) some special ways in which he
thinks psycho-analysis might be useful clinically but his statements are not very
convincing. Both Taylor and Clark devote articles upon the use of modified
psycho-analysis in treatment. The former (315) after quoting some hysterical
cases, thinks that by an incomplete analysis the technique may be so modified
that “we may escape the pitfalls of transference and the time-consuming method
of free association”^ This idea he states “has a far wider applicability and is
beset with few of the dangers of the complete method”. All mystery too, he
says, is laid aside. One would think that the danger would lie far more in
thus playing with the surface of the psyche and shirking responsibilities because
of the difficulties ahead. A physician who feels thus had much better leave
psycho-analysis alone. Clark deals with the point in a different way (68). After
speaking of his experiences he truly states “If one employs psychoanalysis or
psychoanalytic methods in the borderline neuroses and psychoses, it ought to
be used with the greatest of care, but may be employed freely by the physician

104

REVIEW

to enlighten his own mind upon the exact problems he really has to help the
patient to meet and thus make clearer the principles of wide guidance the
physician wishes consciously to arrange for his patient’s betterment or cure’*.
Elsewhere he publishes some of his personal results (60). The general relation
of psycho-analysis to the practice of medicine is surveyed by White (337).

A useful point might be noted here which Brill introduces (13), and that is the
use of the analysis of artificial dreams, if during treatment dream life seems absent.
Brill shows that there is little if any difference between the artificial and the
real dream, and his analyses always showed the person’s difficulties and were
just as helpful in the treatment as the real dream. Stekel has already expressed
similar views.

That many so-called epileptic states are psychogenic in origin has been
already referred to and Emerson has published some cases (100) of what he
terms ‘hystero-epilepsy’ which were psycho-analysed by him and thus treated.
He suggests that the epileptiform seizure is of the nature of an orgasm and
is a substitute for the relief of sexual tension. He thinks that this conception
does not contradict Stekel’s or Clark’s ideas, but rather supplements them, and
that the therapeutic effect of an analysis depends on the possibility of sublimation.
Statistical results are not frequently published, but Coriat gives us some in
his psycho-analytical treatment of the psychoneuroses (78). His results were
obtained from a series of ninety-three cases, but included some psychoses. They
varied in severity and the majority of them had been previously treated in
other ways but in vain. Out of the ninety-three, forty-six recovered, twenty-
seven were much improved, eleven improved and nine were not improved. This
author, too, speaks here of the types of cases which best lend themselves
to psycho-analysis; what constitutes recovery in the various diseases; the
duration of treatment; the determination of the progress of a case; and
concludes with a discussion of the statistical results.

In the psychiatric sphere psycho-analytic work has been mainly directed
to manic-depressive insanity, especially during the normal period, paranoia and
paranoid states, dementia praecox, and to borderland and anomalous conditions.
Clark gives us much encouragement in his article on the psychologic treatment
of retarded depressions (58) (59) and concludes that “an intensive analysis
should be made in every carefully selected case of retarded depression and by
so doing, such individuals will make a sounder recovery from the specific
attack and recurrence in the after-life will often be avoided”. He states, too,
that in no case did he fail to find Hoch’s general principles of the mechanisms
for retarded depressions which the latter laid down in his “Study of the benign
psychoses” (148). A preliminary report on the treatment of dementia praecox
by psycho-analysis is published by Coriat (76) who feels that every such case
especially the mild ones or those in the early stage, should be given the benefit
of a psycho-analysis. He quotes Bertschinger’s three types of spontaneous re¬
adjustment!. e. correction of the delusions, resymbolization, and evasion of the
complex, but adds a fourth brought about by psycho-analysis which is the
most important of all, the return to reality. Some cases are then recorded.
Coriat thinks that the first sign of improvement in dementia praecox under
psycho-analytic treatment is a change in the nature of the dreams; they slowly
become less primitive and infantile. Then follows a change in the social re-

OF THE RECENT PSYCHOANALYTICAL LITERATURE IN ENGLISH 105

actions of the patient, that is, a diminution of the autistic and negativistic
tendencies. A long report of a case of dementia praecox treated by psycho¬
analysis is given by Kempf (187) who also makes some pertinent remarks on
the question of transference. Jelliffe (159) points out that in dementia praecox
the libido has enmeshed itself in a phantasy world where it is bound in the
accumulated affectivity which the original complex situation has gathered to
itself. An ordinary transference is therefore often impossible as the affectivity
guards itself too jealously. He suggests, therefore, a special form of personal
approach which in some minor instances has been successfully tried. This is
the establishment of a triangular transference situation. With one person alone
the affectivity is too much on the defensive but by utilizing the psychical
principle of the threefold family relationship (cp. the Trinity of religions) a
different approach might be made on an earlier level and a transference
accomplished, not towards one person but towards two. Hart in a psycho¬
therapeutic article has discussed the relation between suggestion, persuasion
and psycho-analytic treatment (137).

III. War Literature

Though clinical war experience has given a great stimulus to psycho¬
analytical theories, because the vast importance of the psychogenic factor had
to be recognized when the military neuroses were studied, comparatively little
psycho-analytical literature has been published on the subject in England and
America. The psychology of the soldier himself in the light of modern views,
his adaptation to enlistment, training and active service has been dealt with
by Bird (7), Read (264) and Rivers (273). Read dwells on latent homosexuality
as a possible factor in voluntary enlistment and suggests that many of the
anxiety states not uncommonly met with, might have had relationship with
repression of this tendency. Rivers thinks that military training tends to raise
the suggestibility of the soldier and advocates some modification of it, so that
thereby there may be less tendency for many neurotic disturbances to arise. In
fact he thinks that the term ‘suggestion neurosis’ is an improvement on conversion
hysteria, and similarly would prefer ‘repression neurosis’ to anxiety hysteria.
He thereby would like to get away from Freudian terminology (273).

Whether or not the neuroses of war can be explained by Freudian
mechanisms is very scientifically dealt with by Jones (164 p. 564) (169) who
frankly confesses that not sufficient investigation has been made on the point
to speak with any dogmatism, but states that there is every reason to believe
that the same psychological mechanisms are at work, as in the civil neuroses.
He suggests that in the narcissistic part of the sexual hunger that is attached
to the ego we have the key to the states of terror with which we have been
so familiar in the war neuroses. He doubts that fear of death in the literal
sense or a desire for death is by any means the fundamental attitude and
points out how impossible is the conception of the death of the ego to the
conscious or unconscious mind. Freud dwells on this in his “Reflections on
War and Death” (Transl. II) where he explains that fear of death only
arises from an unconscious sense of guilt. The first contribution to appear

106

REVIEW

on the neuroses was by Eder (92) (94) who coined the term ‘war shock’, a
distinct advance on that hackneyed phrase ‘shell shock’. Hypnotism was solely
used by Eder in his treatment but his suggestions were framed from a previous
superficial psycho-analytical study of the case and he devotes some pages to
explaining the psychological mechanisms that were being made use of. Forsyth
(115) and Farrar (111) both deal with war neuroses and the article by the
latter author is specially helpful. Farrar deals very sensibly with the psychogenic
factor in the causation of the war neuroses and points out that there is evidence
to show that exhaustion is practically a negligible quantity per se as an
aetiological factor. Here he is strongly supported by Stanford Read (260) who
had a wide experience of war psychical disorders. This latter author in his
survey of war neuro-psychiatry strongly criticizes that all-embracing nosological
term ‘neurasthenia’, speaks biiefly of the various neurotic disorders seriatim,
and mentions two cases of mental infantilism from war shock. This clinical
picture as far as the reviewer knows has not been recorded elsewhere in any
English or American war literature. Brown (28) deals superficially with the
question of repression in the neuroses, Prideaux (242) gives us an article on
stammering in these conditions from the psychogenic standpoint, and Dillon
(86) sketches an analysis of a composite neurosis he met with.

The mechanism of repression is the psycho-analytical principle which has
through clinical war experience been most widely discussed and accepted. The
term is now bandied about by many without their having any scientific
conception of what it really involves. Rivers’ article on the “Repression of war
experience” (270) is interesting and he also contributes an account of a case
of claustrophobia of which he superficially analyses the psychic origin (276).
By far the best descriptive work on the war neuroses has been given us by
MacCurdy (207) who traces the gradual evolution of the individual mental
conflict in the soldier until some accidental trauma such as a shell explosion
suddenly brings to light the fully developed anxiety state. The reviewer doubts
whether MacCurdy is right in speaking of the neuroses as a ‘failure of
sublimation’, but he has criticized this point elsewhere (260) (264). It is
evidently true for various reasons that the officer is most liable to anxiety
hysteria while the soldier maladapts through a conversion hysteria. Many cases
are quoted and valuable additional pages are those where heart disorders are
spoken of and the effects of concussion compared with similar conditions but
purely of psychic origin. This monograph has been widely read and has done
much to convince the materialistic school of neurologists that after all there
may be something in the Freudian school of psychopathology.

In the sphere of the psychoses of war there has been very little literature
of any type and hardly anything in English has been contributed. In his
survey of war neuro-psychiatry (260) Stanford Read briefly gives his views
and criticizes the various contributors on the subject. The study of two
epileptoid cases are published elsewhere (261) where he shows by a superficial
psychological analysis the evident causative psychogenic factors and thus
confirms the idea of Jung, Clark and Stekel. An interesting case of pseudologia
phantastica in a soldier appears where it is seen to what an extent a patho¬
logical liar will go for the glorification of his ego. Read has also just published
a work “Military Psychiatry in peace and war” (264) where great stress is

OF THE RECENT PSYCHOANALYTICAL LITERATURE IN ENGLISH 107

laid upon the psychogenic origin of the so-called functional psychoses. He
combats the supposition that any pure exhaustion psychosis exists though such
a nosological term was introduced by the army medical authorities. The most
interesting chapter is upon the paranoid states which he found specially
prevalent among his cases and he makes suggestions as to their possible
pathology. Alcohol is only looked upon as a contributory cause and its relation
to psychotic disease is discussed at some length. His charts and analysis of
3000 consecutive cases of mental disease admitted under his care add greatly
to the interest of the book. A short article recording the experience and views
of a psychiatrist in France is given us by Chambers (48) who evidently well
appreciates the value of the psychic factor.

IV. Applied Psycfio^Analysis

The flood of light that psycho-analytic theories have thrown on various
departments of knowledge previously thought to be so far outside their sphere,
shows plainly the veridity of its basic principles. The growth of civilization,
religion, philosophy and ethics; the productions of literature and art; the
meaning of fairy tales and mythology and folk-lore, all have taken on a new
and clearer aspect. One notes happily that a good deal of literature has been
devoted to this department of psycho-analysis which will now be briefly reviewed*

Though only a translation one must draw attention here to the excellent work
of Rank and Sachs that Payne has given to English readers (Transl. 20). These
authors take up the applicability and significance of psycho-analysis for the
mental sciences, and deal very lucidly and adequately with the following wide
field — The unconscious audits forms of expression; myth and legend investigation;
religion; ethnology and linguistics; aesthetics and the psychology of artists;
philosophy; ethics and law; pedagogy and characterology. The material is too
great to comment upon and should be read by all interested in the subject.

There is little doubt that psycho-analytical principles will in the future
be a great weapon for the advancement of education. Jones (164) gives us
some interesting papers on this question. He points out that mental life must
be regarded in a dynamic way as a stream of desires striving for gratification
and that new desires and interests depend for their intensity and existence on
older trends. The direction taken by those of childhood life is of predominant
importance for the whole future of the individual and it follows that satis¬
factory mental functioning must be attained by inducing harmony between the
early driving forces of mental life. Future education will be more human than
more or less purely intellectual. The success that Pfister (Transl. 18, 19) has
met with in his psycho-analytical work done as pastor and teacher proves
conclusively what hope there is for the future in this respect. Payne (238)
has also helped to show us the right path. Perhaps no single work better
illustrates the modern tendency of pedagogy to recognize and stress individuality
than Lay’s work on the child’s unconscious mind (197) (198) where he more
or less popularly brings psycho-analytical conceptions of childhood and youth
to bear in the schoolroom and home. White (338) has quite lately published a
book for the same purpose. The fact that teachers and parents cannot hope to

108

REVIEW

become psycho-analysts, but that they may study ways in which the main
propositions of the method can be applied to children at large in the schoolroom
and at home is pointed out by Putnam (246). A thoughtful contribution is
made by Fliigel (114), who traces moral development through Freudian mecha¬
nisms. He sees in sublimation the most potent mechanism of mental development
both in the individual and the race, and manifestly a great advance upon mere
repression, since energy is thus set free which otherwise would be uselessly
penned up. The tendency of evolution seems to be towards a more thorough
conscious control of thought and action and an abandonment of the more
primitive attitude involved in repression, but this latter mechanism is an essential
instrument of progress in the early stages of development. In virtue of this the
extent to which any belief or institution is correlated with conscious control
may afford a useful and interesting indication of the cultural status of that
belief or institution. Herein, the author thinks we possess a guide of great
value for the study and direction of moral and social phenomena. Putnam also
deals briefly with the relation of psycho-analysis to education (254).

This leads us on to what has been written as an aid to the understanding
of raciaf psycfjofogy. Brill’s translation of Freud’s “Totem and Taboo
(Transl. 7) is highly welcome to English readers. It is a very valuable contri¬
bution to mass psychology in its developmental and evolutional aspects. It
consists of four essays, viz: 1. The savage dread of incest. 2. Taboo and the
ambivalence of emotions. 3. Animism, magic and the omnipotence of thought,
4. The infantile recurrence of Totemism. The conception is developed in a
fascinating way that the totem is a father image and a whole host of interesting
conclusions follow upon it. Rivers’ discussion of the psychological factors in
the customs, art and magic of various primitive peoples and their relation to
the psychology of dreams has already been noted elsewhere (272). Jelliffe
publishes an interesting autobiography of a case of compulsion neurosis (156)
where, through the analysis and the study of two of Frazer’s works, the patient’s
infantile phantasies were seen to be closely correlated with the animistic ideas
of primitive peoples.

In the region of mgthoCogg Frazer’s “Golden Bough’’ is a gem of litera¬
ture, and Brink has given us a critical review and comparison as well as a
study of man’s evolution with special reference to his grasp of the reality
principle and the resulting formation of an unconscious racial heritage (23).
Brink too, with Jelliffe contributes a psycho-analytic interpretation of the
“Willow Tree” — A Fantasy of old Japan, in which are embodied so many
mythological characteristics (25) (158). The article is titled “Compulsion and
Freedom” because the analysis of this play brings a sympathetic insight into
the compulsion which is at work to a greater or less extent in every psyche
preventing the complete exercise of one’s powers. An essay in comparative
mythology and partly too in the history of medicine from a psycho-analytic
point of view, comes from the pen of White (330) where he discusses the moon
as “libido symbol”, and traces the importance of the moon in the thinking
of all peoples long before the dawn of history. Other mythological contributions
are only found in translations (Transl. 21, 22, 24).

Analytic studies dealing with various aspects of refigion are contributed
by one or two authors. A study in the erotogenesis of religion is given by

OF THE RECENT PSYCHOANALYTICAL LITERATURE IN ENGLISH 109

Schroeder (280) who here analyses an historical Swiss girl, the Wildebuch
crucified Saint. He comes to the conclusion that in this case the very essence
of religion as manifested in the “supernatural” powers was merely supernormal
sexualism, psycho-erotism spiritualized, transcendentalized, apotheosized, and
that with more complete data derived from numerous cases of religious fana¬
ticisms and enthusiasms, it will appear that this is but one of many similar
instances requiring the same erotogenic interpretation. Schroeder regards all
religion, at all times, and everywhere, in its differential essence, as only a sex
ecstasy, seldom so recognized and therefore easily and actually misinterpreted
as mysterious and transcendental. Another essay on the same subject is given
us by this author (281). Groves, in his article “Freudian elements in the animism
of the Niger Delta” (132) analyses the life history of the Western African tribes
of the lower Niger and endeavours to dissect out the meaning of their primi¬
tive philosophy and religion. He shows that the entire animistic system of
these people serves a subjective purpose and represents the control of wish-
motive, how they are dominated by the pleasure-pain principle, and the very
great significance of their dream life. Freud’s “Totem and Taboo” (Transl. 7)
of course also throws light on many primitive religious customs and he
states here that the compulsion neurosis may be looked upon as a caricature
of religion. In a little book of contributions to social and religious psychology (246),
Putnam turns his attention to those motivations of human conduct which
years of keen observation and recent psycho-analytical investigations have
revealed. He finds that the conflict of our rational and emotional impulses
resolves itself into an interaction of two motives, the constructive and the
adaptive, which have an historical development in the individual and race.
While religious faith points to ideals towards which man is striving and in so
doing acknowledging an obligation to a deity, psycho-analysis shows the
presence of unconscious tendencies which if not properly controlled and guided,
often militate against these natural aspirations. Mention should be made here
again of Holt’s volume (149) which endeavours to indicate some of the relation
of Freud’s work to the problem of ethics and behavioristic psychology. Though
somewhat narrow in scope, it reveals many avenues of interesting thought and
speculation.

In the same way as the study of primitive races is helpful for the understanding
of present mental problems, we find aid in the deductions drawn from the
investigation of lower animals. In this department of comparative psySofogy
Kempf has published a paper on the social and sexual behavior of monkeys
and compared these with facts in human behavior (184). Six macasus monkeys
were observed for a period of eight months and the author finds in this animal
man’s phylogenetic determinants completely exposed. Homosexuality is compared
and it is seen that submission as a homosexual object is implicated with
biological inferiority in the infrahuman primate. As in man, also, sexual sub¬
mission is practiced in order to procure food and protection. It is highly
interesting to note that catatonic adaptations are reflexly practiced by these
monkeys as well as by the human primates as a defence.

Psycho-analytic contributions in relation to Citerature have been of great
interest in showing forth the mysterious ways of the unconscious. Coriat (77)
traces out the sadism in Oscar Wilde’s play of Salome, and remarks that Wilde

110

REVIEW

with his insight into sexual perversions and into the polymorphous sexual
instinct of man, because he was himself a sufferer, made an innovation in his
dramatic treatment of the legend as a sadistic episode. The author sees traces
of the same impulse in Wilde’s “Picture of Dorian Grey” and in the “Ballad
of Reading goal”. White has pointed out how psycho-analytic ideas are filtering
through the social fabric, how it is mentioned on the stage, and referred to
in short stories and magazines. We have a novel incorporating it. A story with
an artistic and literary license and dealing with psycho-analytical principles is
found in Hay’s “Mrs. Marden’s ordeal” (140). It is worth reading. Full of
material for thought and reflection is the psychology of “The Yellow Jacket”,
a Chinese poem which was dramatized for the stage (185). The poem with its
mine of symbolism is the product of countless individuals who peopled Eastern
Asia for thousand of years and is therefore a synthetic arrangement of the most
pertinent expression of feeling of those people. Kempf’s analysis and interpretation
of the poem is full of interest, (185), and herein the psycho-analyst finds a
valuable guide for working with the male psychopath. Weinberg (321), among
the archives of philology has unearthed much early literary material wherein, in
the light of Freudian psychology, he sees the tendency to emphasize and glorify
the relation between the nephew and the uncle on the maternal side. He asks
what is the basis of this phenomenon which at first glance affords certainly no
clue to its import, and endeavours to answer the question in a short monograph
(322). Herein he has data to show the significant accentuation of the nephew-
uncle attachment, accompanied by a depreciation of the bond between son and
father, he traces and discusses the father complex and regards heroism in a sense
as a revolt against father domination. Much that Weinberg wfites is helpful in
the understanding of neurotic problems. The analysis of more modern literature
appears in the psycho-analytical reading of Francis Thompson’s great poem “The
Hound of Heaven” which Moore views as the autobiography of the author (221).
Therein is the story of the strivings of the libido, at first unchecked, un¬
compensated and without any sublimation, later efforts are seen to direct it
through one channel and another, until finally we witness the triumph of the
individual over libido in a religious sublimation. Somewhat similarly Kuttner
analyses D. H. Lawrence's novel — “Sons and Lovers”, and draws highly
interesting psychological deductions (194). Shakespeare of course abounds in
opportunities for the psycho-analytic dissection of various characters. This
Tannenbaum points out (309) and gives an illustration of this in an article (307).
Mac Curdy takes the characters of Hamlet and Orestes and from them draws
psychiatric parallels (211). It would seem that there has always existed a semi¬
conscious realization of the dream’s significance and the literary artist not
infrequently, whenever he has constructed the dreams of his characters, has
unconsciously shown that the dream is a product full of meaning and so con¬
firming Freud’s thesis. Freud himself has given us a fine example of this in
his “Delusion and Dream” (Transl. 7) where he presents an analysis of a novel
“Gradiva”. Strewn through the analysis are invaluable comments, more
particularly between delusions and dreams and upon the mechanism of recovery
from delusions. Another contribution is from the pen of Weinberg (321) where
the analysis appears of the dream in “Jean Christophe”. Highly welcome
is the last addition to works under this heading which is an endeavour to supply

OF THE RECENT PSYCHOANALYTICAL LITERATURE IN ENGLISH 111

some of the methods of psycho-analysis to literature and an attempt to read
closely behind the lines of an author’s work. This book by Mordell (223) —
‘The erotic motive in literature” is a mine of information, and evinces a keen
psychological insight on the part of the author. To attempt a review of its
contents is not feasible here.

Though the relation of the unconscious to art is full of interest, little has
been written on the subject of late. Mac Curdy has done work with Hoch on
the psychology of the benign psychoses and in a paper on the precipiting
causes of these he traces the relation to art (209). A study of these factors
explains the elusive source of our feelings and it is demonstrated that art has
grown from crudity to refinement pari passu, as the race has developed from
barbarism to civilization, while all artists, no matter what their medium of
expression is, are quite unconscious of the source of their inspiration. His
theory is, then, that one of the secrets of art has been laid bare by the re¬
actions of the mentally unsound. Art makes a conscious appeal but beneath
the surface, which is only a symbol, is the hidden meaning which speaks to
the unconscious. In a psychological note on a photo-play. Last gives an illu¬
stration of this (195), and Burr analyses out the complexes portrayed pictorially
by the insane (31). Highly interesting, too, in this respect is Evart’s article,
where in a lace creation by a psychotic female patient is revealed an incest
phantasy. Bit by bit he analyses out the various figures on this curious lace
production (of which he gives an excellent photograph) and traces their symbolic
meaning in the life history of the individual.

Excellent and stimulating reading is provided in the psycho-analytic
character studies of historical personages, by means of which their life’s work
and adult traits are traced to early experiences, and the sublimation or reaction
to infantile trends. Such studies as these throw a flood of light upon what
otherwise would have been regarded as due more or less to chance causation.
Dooley gives us some psycho-analytic studies of genius (89) which is a col¬
lection of epitomes or abstracts of essays on the psychology of great men,
which have appeared from time to time during the last decade, for the most
part in German psycho-analytical periodicals. Freud’s study of Leonardo da
Vinci (Transl. 7) is abstracted, where so much in the life of this great artist
is traced to an early vulture phantasy, and other highly interesting points
discussed. Besides, the life histories of the following personages are similarly
treated — Giovanni Segantini, Andrea del Sarto, Hamlet, Dante, Nicolaus
Lenau, Heinrich von Kleist, Gogol, Wagner, Napoleon I, Louis Bonaparte King
of Holland (174), Amenhotep IV of Egypt, Count Ludwig von Zinzendorf,
Margaret Ebner, Ignatius Loyola, and Schopenhauer. Viereck contributes a very
subjective monograph on Roosevelt which he terms a study in ambivalence
(319), Karpas publishes an article on Socrates in the light of modern psycho¬
pathology (179), and Blanchard pens a psycho-analytic study of Auguste
Comte (8). Kempf, who is always illuminating, is specially so when he treats
of Charles Darwin’s personality, the affective sources of his inspiration and his
anxiety neurosis (186). Darwin’s interest in the expression of emotions and
his early investigation of flower life had their origin in parental influences
which also moulded his character and career. The origin of his anxiety neurosis
Kempf attributes to a complete father submission, but all disconcerting affective

112

REVIEW

reactions were successfully repressed by his adroitly selecting conversions and
thus Darwin had only the inconvenience of nutritional disturbances, uncom¬
fortable cardiac and vasomotor reactions, vertigo, tremor and insomnia. Putnam
analyses the life of a lady to illustrate conflicts and throws light on certain
undesirable effects of a strict “old fashioned” religious training (250), the results
of which every psychopathologist not infrequently meets with clinically. A
somewhat superficial study of the Kaiser is published by Prince (243) in book
form and in which he discusses the Kaiser’s divine right delusion and his
self-regarding sentiment, and regards his ideas on democracy as a subconscious
phobia, a fear of democracy because of the danger to himself and his House
of Hohenzollern. Following upon this the Kaiser’s antipathy must be looked
upon as a defense reaction of an intensely emotional character w^hich aims to
direct his activities in a direction that will protect him against the dangers of
democracy. However, the psychological dissection goes little below the surface.

We now come to the literature that has been devoted to psycho-analysis in
its manifold socioCogicaf aspects. In his book “The principles of mental
hygiene” (328) White briefly but thoughtfully speaks of the psychological side
of the insane, the neurotic, the feebleminded, and miscellaneous problems of
society. To the student in such matters this work is highly to be recommended.
The sociologic importance of Freudian teaching as a basis for the interpretation
of the motives and actions of man, is sensibly dwelt on by Groves (131) (133)
and Burrow dilates upon the relation of the psycho-analyst to the community
(40) Jones’ interesting essay on “War and individual psychology” (172) shows
so plainly how psycho-analysis can help to throw light on one of the greatest
of social problems. He dwells on the effect of emotional factors on decision
and judgment and asks whether man does not tend to prefer war in the solution
of socio-political problems. It is pointed out that there is a constant tendency
to regress to primitive manifestations of repressed impulses and it is possible that
he terrible events of war cruelties, etc. are not unconnected with the underlying,
causes of war itself. The interesting query is put as to whether we are not
nearly reaching the limits of sublimation? If repression is carried too far, the
energies revert to their unconscious sources and lead to some outbreak. A
lessening of repression may allow better sublimation. War perhaps furnishes the
monst potet stimulus to mankind, good and bad. Brill, in his study of the
adjustment of the Jew to the American environment (20) illustrates another
side of psycho-analytical sociology. Karpas writes on civilizaticn and insanity (180)
and attacks the vital social problem of prostitution (182) from the point of
view of the psychopathologist. That the spread of psycho-analytical principles
in the sphere of education more especially, will in time tend to decrease the
incidence of insanity is a rightful hope, and Putnam deals with this point (256).
In America largely through the influence of the National Committee for Mental
Hygiene, a great advance has been made in the application of modern psycho-
pathological knowledge to questions pertaining to the faw. Though, strictly
speaking, his work is not psycho-analytical, Healey’s work should be referred
to. In his dealing with juvenile offenders of all types, he has found by simple
observation and psychological insight that the great majority of these delinquencies
can be traced to sexual conflicts, and in so many respects he has amply con¬
firmed Freud’s teaching. His invaluable work (141) (142) should certainly be read

OF THE RECENT PSYCHOANALYTICAL LITERATURE IN ENGLISH 113

by all psycho-analysts. Glueck has done excellent work at Sing-Sing prison,
in his psychopathological studies of tfie criminaC. He sees in the so-called
‘prison psychoses’, defence reactions and shows the large proportion of the
mentally abnormal among the admissions to his prison. In his book on “Forensic
Psychiatry” (124) he gives an analysis of a case of kleptomania, which he
traces to a sexual conflict.

A fresh and interesting note is struck by Hull in an article entitled “The
Long Handicap” (150) where she draws attention to the racial history of woman
and the present day development of a female individual, and wherein she sees
more causes for suppression than in the life of the male. This is thought to be
related to whole bodies of conventions, of taboos, etc. which prevent woman from
achieving an integrated development. The points are discussed from a psycho¬
analytic standpoint and Adler’s theory of compensation. Schroeder deals with similar
topics in speaking of the psychogenetics of androcratic evolution (282) which he
thinks is obviously founded on the differences in the visible mechanism of sex. He
supposes that androcracy was a natural consequense of that mysticism of ignorance
which synchronously produced phallic worship, and proposes certain remedies.

It only remains to refer to Brill’s little contribution on the psychopathology
of the new modern dances (16). He discusses the connections of the movement
and rhythm with sexuality.

One of the special social applications of psycho-analytical principles in the
future will be the superficial investigation of individual mentalities in order to
judge as far as possible what special direction in life’s work should be under¬
taken. That such an undertaking at the budding age, will both enhance the
good of the social unit and the general prosperity of society, is patent. Brill
has made a preliminary communication on the psychopathology of sefections
of vocations (21) and future contributions on this important problem will be
highly welcome.

REPORTS OF THE INTERNATIONAL PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL

ASSOCIATION.

OFFICIAL COMMUNICATIONS
To the Presidents of the Constituent Societies.

When I accepted the election to the Presidency of the Inter¬
national Psycho-Analytical Association in September 1918 I did so
on the supposition that normal conditions would soon be restored
and would enable me to enter into communication with the indi¬
vidual constituent groups.

It has turned out otherwise. Budapest was for months quite
cut off from all communication with the outer world and is even
now accessible postally only with extraordinary difficulty. Under
these circumstances I have been unable not only to carry out the
programme I had intended as President, but even to continue the
normal presidential business, and that in spite of the arduous efforts
of our General Secretary, Dr von Freund.

I was thus recently compelled to confide the Presidency to the
charge of the Vienna Society i^vide Zeitschrip, p. 230). Since,
however, Vienna also was by no means free from the disturbances
in communication which had led me to transfer the Presidency
there, I had to decide on a more radical solution if important
interests of the Association were not to suffer from this state of
affairs.

I have therefore asked Dr Ernest Jones (111 Harley St, London,
W. I.), the President of the British Society, whom I met in Vienna,
to conduct temporarily the affairs of the International Psycho-Ana¬
lytical Association, and begged him to choose a General Secre¬
tary from the members of his Society. Jones accepted the trust, and
selected Mr. J. C. FlOgel (11 Albert Road, London, N. W. I.) as General
Secretary.

Until the next Congress, therefore. Dr. Jones undertakes all
the rights and duties constitutionally pertaining to the Presidency,
including the editing of the Reports of the Association and the
collecting of the members’ subscriptions. The subscriptions and

REPORTS

115

Other business concerning the Zeitschrift and Imago, the two
official organs in German, continue to be tlie affair of the Inter-
nationaler Psychoanalytischer Verlag (Wien L, Griinangergasse 3).

I beg that the Presidents of the constituent societies will
enter into relations with the temporary President, Dr Ernest Jones,
as soon as possible, and offer him all the support which unfa¬
vourable circumstances have prevented them from giving to me.

I reserve for myself the conducting of the next Congress, at
which the new President will be elected.

Vienna, October 3rd, 1919. S. FERENCZI.

To the Secretaries of the Constituent Societies.

January 24 th, 1920.

Dear Sir, I beg to inform you that I am now acting as General
Secretary of the International Psycho-Analytical Association, and I
take this opportunity of confirming the informal message sent to you
a few days ago to the effect that the 6 th International Psycho-Ana¬
lytical Congress will be held at the Hague on September 8 th, 9 th
and 10th, 1920. I shall be greatly obliged if you will be kind
enough to ask those of your members who hope to attend the
Congress to communicate with Dr. J. H. W. van Ophuijsen, the
Hague, Prinse Vinkenpark, 5, who is acting as Secretary of the
local Reception Committee and who will advise as regards accommo¬
dation at the Hague, visa formalities etc.

I shall be glad if those who wish to present communications
to the Congress will kindly send particulars of the proposed com-
munications to me at my address.

Assuring you, dear Sir, of my best consideration,

I remain.

Yours faithfully,

J. C. FLUGEL.

11 Albert Road, London, N. W. 1.

1. HISTORY OF THE BRITISH PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL SOCIETY

The British Psycho-Analytical Society was inaugurated at a
Meeting held at Dr. Ernest Jones’, 69, Portland Court, London W. 1,
on February 20th, 1919, to which he had invited Dr. Douglas

116

REPORTS

Bryan, Dr. Devine, Mr. J. C. Fliigel, Dr. D. Forsyth, Mr. Eric Hiller,
Miss Barbara Low, Dr. Stanford Read, and Dr. W. H. B. Stoddart.
All the above were present except Mr. Flttgel.

Dr. Jones then explained the objects of the meeting. He men¬
tioned that about two years ago a Society called the London
Psycho-Analytical Society had been formed, of which he had been
the President. Owing to the fact that certain members of that
Society had adopted views which were in contradiction to the
principles of Psycho-Analysis the objects of that Society were
negatived. As some members of the London Psycho-Analytical
Society were present it was decided that the following resolution
should be sent to the Secretary of that Society. Resolution that
some members of the London Psycho-Analytical Society suggest
that the Society exist no longer, unless any other members make
a contrary suggestion.

It was then resolved that a British Psycho-Analytical Society be
formed, that application be made for affiliation to the International
Psycho-Analytical Association, and that the Society be governed
by the rules of the Association. Officers of the Society were then
duly elected.

It was resolved that the membership should be a limited one
and for the present should consist of those present, with Mr. Fliigel,
but that the number of members should at any time be increased
according to the opinion of the meeting of the members. Future
membership should take place by election by ballot after nomination
by the committee.

It was further resolved to admit Associate Members of the
Society for one year after nomination by the committee. Such
members should enjoy all the other privileges of the Society but
should have no vote in the business affairs of the Society.

It was resolved that the subscription should be two guineas
per annum, which should include the Journal and the Subscription
to the International Psycho-Analytical Association.

Since this meeting it has been decided to form a library
of the Society and Mr. Eric Hiller has been elected as Hon.
Librarian.

There have been up to the present ten meetings of the Society.

At a meeting held on April 10th, 1919, Mr. Fliigel presented
a psycho-analytical study of King Henry VIII. At a meeting held
on May I5th, 1919, Dr. Forsyth read a paper on “The Psychology

REPORTS

117

of the New-born Infant”. This interesting paper was discussed also
at the next meeting held on June 12 th, 1919. At this meeting Miss
Barbara Low opened a discussion on Note-taking and Reporting
of Psycho-analytical Cases.

At a meeting held on July 10th, 1919, Dr. Douglas Bryan read
a translation of Dr. Karl Abraham’s article on “Ejaculatio Praecox”;
this was followed by a discussion of the subject.

On November 6 th, 1919, Dr. Bryan opened a discussion on
“Street Anxiety”, also reading a translation of Dr. Karl Abraham’s
remarks on this subject.

At a meeting held on December, 11th, 1919, the Society had
the privilege of welcoming Dr. Otto Rank of Vienna.

The last four meetings, on December 11th, 1919, and
January 15 th, February 11th, March 11th, 1920, have been given
up to a general discussion on various points brought forward by
members. Among the various subjects that have been discussed are
the following:

Matters of theory dealing with the question of the repression
of emotion during psycho-analysis.

Some points arising out of a case of masochism and homo¬
sexuality.

The question of transference in Hypnosis and Psycho-Analysis.

Points with regard to the Ethics of Psycho-Analysis, including
the question of secrecy.

The difference, if any, between obsessional fears and phobias.

The question of the advisability of psycho-analysing artists.

Points arising out of cases have been discussed, with questions
of technique and methods of procedure.

At the meetings held on April 10th and July 10th, 1919,
Dr. Ernest Jones consulted the Society regarding various propo¬
sals that had been made for the establishment of a Journal of
Psycho-Analysis in English. He reported that the [International
Psycho-Analytical Press was prepared to consider the possibility of
publishing such a Journal in conjunction with the official Zeitschrift,
provided that sufficient financial support was forthcoming from
America and Great Britain, and a circular appealing for promises
of support for this purpose, signed by Drs. Bryan, Forsyth, Ernest
Jones, Stoddart, and Vaughan Sawyer, was laid before the Society.
Various points were raised and suggestions made by different
members. At the meeting held on November 6th Dr. Jones gave

118

REPORTS

an account ot his visit to Switzerland and Vienna. The Executive
of the International Association, Dr. Ferenczi and v. Freund, after
consultation with the Presidents of the various constituent Societies
had decided to inaugurate an official organ of the Association in
English, and the Directors of the International Press had accepted
the proposal that they publish it on the same lines as the Zeit-
schrift under the direction of Professor Freud. Dr. Ernest Jones had
been asked to edit the new Journal pending the meeting of the
Congress in September.

Members.

(1) . Major Owen Berkeley-Hill, I. M. S., European Hospital, Ranchi, India.

(2) . Dr. Douglas Bryan, (Hon. Secretary), 72 Wimpole Street, London W. 1.

(3) . Mr. Cyril Burt, 1 Park Villas, Highgate, London N. 6.

(4) . Dr. H. Devine, Corporation Mental Hospital, Portsmouth.

(5) . Mr. J. C. FlUgel, 11 Albert Road, Regent’s Park, London, N. W. 1.

(6) . Dr. D. Forsyth (Member of the Committee), 74 Wimpole Street,

London W. 1.

(7) . Mr. Eric Hiller, 7 Mecklenburgh Street, London W. C. 1.

(8) . Dr. Ernest Jones (President), 111, Harley Street, London W. 1.

(9) . Miss Barbara Low, 13, Guilford Street, Russell Square, London W. C. 1.

(10) . Dr. William Mackenzie, Piazza Meridiana, Genoa.

(11) . Dr. Stanford Read, Fisherton House, Salisbury.

(12) . Dr. R. M. Riggall, Wimpole Street, London W. 1.

(13) . Mrs. Riviere, 10 Nottingham Terrace, London N. W. 1.

(14) . Dr. Vaughan Sawyer, 131 Harley Street, London W. 1.

(15) . Colonel Sutherland, I. M. S., United Service Club, Calcutta.

(16) . Dr. W. H. B. Stoddart, (Hon. Treasurer), Harcourt House, Cavendish Square,

London W. 1.

Associate Members.

(1) . Mr. P. B. Ballard, M. A., Divisional Office, Peckham Road, London S. E.

(2) . Dr. Brend, 14, Bolinbroke Grove, Wandsworth Common, London S. W.

(3) . Dr. Estelle Maud Cole, 30 New Cavendish St., London W. 1.

(4) . Dr. Davison, Special Medical Board, 78, Lancaster Gate, London W. 2.

(5) . Dr. Bernard Hart, 81 Wimpole Street, London W. 1.

(6) . Dr. W. J. Jago, 63, Park Hill, Clapham, London S. W.

(7) . Dr. Norman Lavers, Bailbrock House, Bath.

(8) . Dr. T. W. Mitchell, Hadlow, near Tonbridge, Kent.

{9). Professor Percy Nunn, D. Sc., Training College, Southampton Row,
London.

(10) . Mrs. Porter, 28 Ashbum Place, London, S. W. 7.

(11) . Dr. W. H. R. Rivers, St. Johns College, Cambridge.

(12) . Major R. B. Ryan, 4 Milverton Street, Moonee Ponds, Melbourne,

Australia.

(14). Dr. Maurice Wright, 118, Harley Street, London W. 1.

REPORTS

119

2. NEW YORK PSYCHOANALYTIC SOCIETY
List of Members.

Dr. A. A. Brill (Secretary).

Dr. Sanger Brown.

Dr. Leonard Blumgart.

Dr. H. W. Frink.

Dr. F. J. Farnell.

Dr. Bernard Glueck.

Dr. Mary K. Isham.

Dr. Josephine Jackson.

Dr. M. A. Meyer.

Dr. C. P. Oberndorf (President).
Dr. B. Onuf.

Dr. AdolfStem (Corresp. Secret.).
Dr. Joseph Smith.

Dr. Skevirsky.

Dr. Walter M. Kraus.

Dr. Edith Spaulding.

Dr. Frankwood Williams.

Dr. I. S. Wechsler.

Dr. Marion Kenworthy.

Dr. Thomas K. Davis.

1 West Seventieth St., New York.

37 West 64 th St, New York.

57 West 68 th St, New York.

17 East 38 th St., New York.

59 Blackstone Boulevard, Providence, R. 1.

44 East 60 th St., New York.

135 West 79 th St., New York.

1971 Morton Ave., Pasadena, Cal.

53 East 95 th St, New York.

249 West 74 th St, New York.

208 Montrose Ave., Rutherford, New York.

40 West 84 th St., New York.

697 Eastern Parkway, Brooklyn, New York.
640 Madison Ave., New York.

141 West 75 th St., New York.

418 West 20 th St., New York.

c/o Mental Hygiene, 50 Union Square, New York.

1291 Madison Ave., New York.

No Address.

20 West 50 th St., New-York.

The following papers were read before the Society between Oc¬
tober 1914 and December 1919.

Oct. 29, 1914. Dr. Morris Karpas: “Socrates in the light of modem
Psychopathology”.

Nov. 24, 1914. Dr. A. A. Brill: “Abnormal Artistic Productions”.

Dec. 22, 1914. Dr. F. M. Hallock: “Outline of an Ancient System

of Psychology”.

Jan. 26, 1915. Dr. H. W. Frink: “The Analysis of a Severe Case
of Compulsion Neurosis”.

Oct. 22, 1915. Dr. A. A. Brill: “Psychoanalysis and Mental Pro¬
phylaxis”.

Nov. 23, 1915. Dr. J. J. Putnam, by invitation: “The Adler
Theories”.

Mar. 28, 1916. Dr. C. P. Oberndorf: “The Analysis of Symptoms”.

April 26, 1916. Dr. A. A. Brill: “The Psychopathology of Noise”.

Oct. 24, 1916. Dr. H. W. Frink: “A Case of Anxiety Hysteria”.

Nov. 28, 1916. Symposium on “Resistance”. Opened by Dr.

C. P. Oberndorf, participated in by the members
of the Society.

Jan. 23, 1917. Dr. F. M. Hallock: “A Case of Mixed Neurosis”.

REPORTS

120

Mar.

Apr.

May

Dec.

Jan.

Mar.

Apr.

Oct.

Nov.

Dec.

27, 1917. Dr. Adolph Stem: “Counter Transference**.

29, 1917. Dr. A. A. Brill: “The Psychopathology ol the
Selection of a Vocation**.

29, 1917. Dr. Bernard Glueck, by invitation: “Adler’s Con¬
tribution to the Psychoanalytic Literature**.

17, 1917. Dr. Mary K. Isham: “A Case of Hysteria*’.

29, 1918. Symposium on “Transference**. By the members
of the Society.

25, 1919. Dr. A. A. Brill. “The Empathic Index**.

26, 1919. Dr. Adolph Stem: “Extracts from the Analysis of

an Eight Year Old Boy”.

29, 1919. Dr. C. P. Oberndorf: “Reaction to Personal
Names”.

25, 1919: Dr. A. A. Brill: “Sex and Sex Weaklings”.

23, 1919. Dr. A. Stern: “Some Factors in Character Deve¬
lopment**.

3. BERLIN PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL SOCIETY

At the instigation of Dr. Eitingon a Policlinic was founded and

opened on Febmary 14th, 1920.

The following papers were read before the Society and business

transacted:

July 19th, 1919. Dr. Eitingon proposes the foundation of a Poli¬
clinic. The resolution is carried unanimously.

July 26th, 1919. Discussion on practical questions regarding the
Policlinic.

Sept. 5th, 1919. Dr. Simmel: “Some points regarding propaganda
in the interest of the Policlinic.

Sept. 26th, 1919. Business meeting: Drs. Eitingon, Simmel, Abra¬
ham are constituted as the Directing Committee ol
the Policlinic.

Oct. 14th, 1919. Dr. Simmel: “Psycho-Analysis of Gambling”.

Oct. 24th, 1919. Dr. Koerber: “Egotism and Narcissism”.

Nov. 6th, 1919. Dr. Abraham: “Prognosis of Psycho-Analytic Treat¬
ment in Advanced Age”.

Nov. 20th, 1919. Dr. Eitingon: “Report on Freud’s paper: ‘Ein
Kind wird geschlagen’ (‘A child is beaten’)**.

Dec. 4th, 1919. Dr. Liebermann: “A Case of Anxiety Hysteria”.

REPORTS

121

Dec. 18th, 1919. Dr. Abraham: “The Narcissistic Estimation of the
Excretory Function in Dreams and Neuroses”.
Jan. 22th, 1920. Mrs. Dr. phil. Baumgarten (by invitation): “Freud’s
Interpretation of Dreams”.

Febr 14th, 1920. Inauguration of the Policlinic.

Mar. 11th, 1920. Dr. Boehm: “Homosexuality and Polygamy”.

All the members of the Society subscribe for the books pub¬
lished by the “Psychoanalytischer Verlag”.

Dr. Abraham is commissioned by the Society to give a series
of lectures on selected topics of Psycho-Analysis at the Policlinic,
followed by discussions.

4. THE DUTCH PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL SOCIETY
Annual Report for 1919.

In the previous report only two scientific meetings were men¬
tioned; five meetings were held in 1919.

1st meeting on February 2nd. 1) Dr. StSrcke: “Demonstration
of Drawings and Clay-Statuettes by a Sculptor suffering from a mild
Hebephfenia, produced during his Stay in the Asylum”. 2) Dr. Starcke:
“Influenza and Psychosis”. 3) Dr. v. Renterghem: “Part of the Life-
Story of an Hysterical Patient**.

IInd meeting on March 30th. 1) Dr. v. Renterghem: “The

Case of the Hysterical Patient”, concluded. 2) Dr. Starcke:
“Complementary Notes to the Demonstration of the Art-Productions
of the Hebephrenic Sculptor**. 3) Dr. Starcke: “The Negative
Turning of the Libido in the Paranoia of Persecution”; Dr. v.
Ophuijsen: “Psycho-Analytical Remarks on the Contents of the
Paranoia of Persecution**. These two lectures dealing with the same
subject and leading to identical results were conceived quite inde¬
pendently of one another (published in the InteTnat. Zeitschrift,
Vol. V, No. 4 und Vol. VI, No. 1).

Illrd meeting on May 18th. 1) Dr. Starcke: **Introduction to a
Discussion on Ferenczi’s Modification of Therapeutic Technique in
Psycho-Analysis” (see Intemat. Zeitsckrift, Vol. V., No. 1).
2) Discussion on the same. 3) Dr. Starcke: “The Castration-
Complex”.

IVth meeting on October 26th. 1) Dr. v. d. Chijs: “Some Short
Examples of Symptom-Actions”. 2) Dr. v. d. Hoop: “Homosexuality
and Paranoia Persecutoria”.

122

REPORTS

Vth meeting on December 14 th. 1) Dn Tuyt: “On Remorse”.

2) Dr. V. Ophuijsen: “Progress in the Technique of Psycho-Ana-

lytic Treatment” (from the Annual Report for 1915—1919).

The Hon. Librarian, of the Society is Prof. Bouman in Amsterdam.

5. HUNGARIAN PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL SOCIETY

The following papers were read before the Society in 1919 and

business transacted.

A. Scientific meetings.

Jan. 12 th. Dr. B. Felszeghy: “The Psycho-Analysis of Panic”
(appeared in Imago VI, 1920, No. 1).

Jan. 28th. Dr. J. Hermann: “On the Depth-Dimensions of
Thinking”.

Febr. 9 th. Dr. J. Eisler: “On Pathological Shame” (see Internat.
Zeitschrift, V, No. 3).

Febr. 16th. Dr. G. R6heim: “On Witches and Fairies.”

Febr. 23rd. Dr. J. Harnik and Dr. S. Rad6: “Notes on Cases”.

Mar. 9 th. Dr. J. Holl6s: “Extracts from the Analysis of a Case
of Hystero-Epilepsy”.

Mar. 23rd. Dr. Elisabeth R^v^sz: “Psycho-Analysis of a Case oi
Kleptomania”.

May 4th. Dr. S. Ferenczi: “Notes on Cases”.

June 8 th. Dr. S. Feldmann: “Neurotic Character-Traits of the
Jews”.

June 22nd. Dr. S. Pfeifer: “On the importance of Dreams related
in the beginning of treatment”.

July 13th. Mrs. M. Klein: ‘^Remarks on the Intellectual Develop¬
ment of a Child”.

Dec. 7 th. Dr. J. Holl6s: “Notes on Cases”.

Dec. 21 rst Dr. S. Rad6: “Report on Freud’s “History of an In¬
fantile Neurosis” (see ^'Sammlung Kleiner Schriften*',
Part. IV).

Dec. 28 th. Dr. J. Holl6s: “On the Development of Paranoic Ideas”.

B. Business meetings.

Jan. 12 th. The subscription to the Society was raised to
Kronen 120.

REPORTS

123

Mar. 9th. (General meeting): The annual report was read and the
officers of the Society were re-elected.

In May 1918 Dr. G6za R6heim read a paper on “Inversion and
Ambivalence” before the Hungarian Ethnological Society.

In February and March 1919 Dr. Ferenczi was commissioned
by the Committee for Popular Instruction to give a series of popular
lectures on Psycho-Analysis.

> 6. VIENNA PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL SOCIETY

In the winter 1919/1920 the following papers were read before the Society
and business transacted.

Nov. 2nd, 1919. Dr. Th. Reik: “Oedipus and the Sphinx” (ap¬
peared in Imago VI, 1920, No. 2).

Nov. 30th, 1919. General meeting: The annual report was read. The
Hon. Treasurer, Dr. Steiner, who resigned his office
was formally thanked by the Society, and Dr. Ne-
pallek elected in his stead. The other members
of the Committee are re-elected. Subscription for
the Society raised to Kronen 100 for a half-year.
Dr. Bernfeld: “Psycho-Analytic Problems in the
History of Pedagogics”.

Dec. 21st, 1920. Dr. W. Fockschaner: “A Case of Paranoia”.

Jan. 2nd, 1920. Discussion on the Foundation of a Society for
the Cultivation of Psycho-Analysis. Report ot
Dr. Bernfeld on the tendencies and organisation
of such a society.

Jan. 18th, 1920. Discussion continued.

Feb. 1 st, 1920. Reports and Communications.

1) Dr. Hitschmann: “On the r61e of urethral
eroticism in obsessional neurosis”.

2) Dr. Hug-Hellmuth: “On colour-hearing in
children”. “A wish-fulfilling dream”.

3) Dr. Fedem: Report on Th. Zell’s book “Die
Diktatur der Liebe im Tierreich”.

4) Dr. Nunberg: “Left and Right in Dreaming”.
“The Connection of Sadism with the Function
of Eating”.

5) Dr. Helene Deutsch: “Report on Patients”.

124

REPORTS

6) W. Schmideberg: “The Marksmanship of
Unconscious Action”.

Febr. 22nd, 1920. Dr. Nunberg: “The course of the libido-conflict
in schizophrenia”.

Mar. 7 th, 1920. Dr. P. Schilder: “On Identification”.

♦

A Swiss Psycho-Analytical Society was inaugurated in ZQrich on March 21st,
1919 on the instigation of Dr. Emil Oberholzer, Mrs. Dr. Mira Oberholzer,
and Pastor Dr. Oskar Pfister. The new Society consists of 27 members. Six
meetings were held in 1919.

In the first meeting on March 24 th, 1919 it was resolved that application
be made for affiliation to the International Psycho-Analytical Association. The
formal acknowledgment of the new Society will take place at the next meeting
of the Congress.

Bailli^re, Tindall & Cox

Second Edition. Revised and Enlarged. Royal 8vo. Pp. x + 718. Price 30/ net

(postage 6d.).

Papers on Psycho ^Analysis

By ERNEST JONES, M.D., M.R.C.P. (Lond.), Co-editor of the International
Journal of Medical Psycho-Analysis, President of the British Psycho-
Analytical Society, Late Associate Professor of Psychiatry at the Uni-
versity of Toronto.

“The reader will find that these papers contain a great deal ot instructive exposition and elucidation
of Freudian lore, but they are more than a mere reproduction of the views of the Viennese professor.
The writer has incorporated much material trom his own experience, and he combats the cnticisms
which have been advanced against the Freudian theory. A noteworthy contribution to the subject ot
psycho-analysis.”— The Lancet.

Second Edition. Pp. xxviii + 492, with 1 Coloured Plate and 15 Figures.
Price 18s. net (postage 6d. extra).

Collected Papers on Analytical Psychology

By C. G. JUNG, M.D., LL.D., Formerly of the University of Zurich. Authorised
Translation edited by DR. CONSTANCE E. LONG, Medical Officer, Edu¬
cation Board; Member Advisory Committee Insurance Act; Ex-President
Association of Registered Medical Women, etc.

NOW READY. Demy 8vo. Pp. xvi. + 366. Price 12s. 6d. net (postage 6d.).

A Manual of Nenrasthenia

IVO GEIKIE COBB, M.D., M.R.CS., Neurologist, Ministry of Pensions, Late
Assistant to Out-Patient Physician, the Middlesex Hospital, Formerly Neuro¬
logist, Brinnington Section, Second Western General Hospital.

Just Published. Demy 8vo. Pp. viii. — 233. Price 10/6 net (postage 6d.).

Treatment of the Nenroses

By ERNEST JONES, M.D., M.R.C.P., etc.

It being evident that the treatment of the neuroses is now engaging the interest of the medical pro¬
fession to an extent never before approached, this has seemed an appropriate moment to publish a
review of the various methods of treatment at our disposal, and, as the writer is in the peculiar position

_at all events in this country—of having had a considerable experience with all the main methods,

he has regarded it as a duty to undertake this task.

Pp. viii 4- 342. Price 7/6 net (postage 6d.).

Advanced Suggestion (Nenrodaduction)

By HAYDN BROWN, L.R.C.P., Edin.

This work, which is based on nine years’ practical experience with the most puzzling problems to be
found in the consulting rooms of specialists, should prove to be of extreme interest to all those who
desire further knowledge on the subject with which it treats.

Bailli^re, Tindall & Cox, 8, Benrietta Street, Covent Garden, London, W.C.2

Dr* Binswangcr

SANATORIUM BELLEVUE

KREUZLINGEN

Switzerland. (Established 1865)

For treatment of Nervous and Mental Com¬
plaints. Sanatorium consists of 10 detached
Villas in well laid-out grounds — 7 for patients
suffering from Neuroses and Nervous Pro¬
stration; 3 Villas for Mental Diseases. Instal¬
lation for Hydrotherapy, Gymnastic, Massage,
Artistic Hand Industries, Gardening, tennis etc.
For particulars apply to the Manager.

SANATORIUM

for nervous patients

kOsnacht, lake of zCtrich

Switzerland

A Sanatorium for the care and treatment of
patients suffering from nervous and mental dis¬
orders, inebriety and addiction to drugs.
Magnificent situation, with extensive grounds
on the banks of the lake. — Modem com¬
forts. Amusements and sports. -- Individual
medical attention. Two doctors. A prospectus
will be forwarded on request.

Proprietor and superintendent

Dr. Th. Brunner.

ETABLISSEMENT MEDICAL

LE CHANET

s/ Neufchatel, Suisse

600 m altitude

Affections d’origine nerveuse, de¬
pressions, surm^nage, convalescence,
intoxications, rhumatismes.
Grand pare, vue magnifique

Dr. M. Dardel

ARCHIVIO OENERALE DI
NEUROLOGIAe PSICHIATRIA

fondato da Mi LEVI BIANCHINI (Nocera Superiore)
e diretto in collaborazione con G. ANTONINI
(Milano), C. COLUCCI (Napoli), S. DE
SANCTIS (Roma), E. LA PEGNA (Aversa),
M. LEVI BIANCHINI (Nocera Superiore)
E. MEDEA (Milano), G. MINGAZZINI (Roma),
G. MODENA (Ancona), D. VENTRA (Nocera
Inferiore), L. ZANON DAL BO (Treviso).

Si pubblica in fascicoli trimestrali costituenti a
fine d’anno un volume di 40—45 fogli di stampa.

Abbonamento annuo Italia e Coionie L 35.-. Estero L 70.-
Unfascicoloseparato,, „ „12.-. „ ,,18.-

Per tutto quanto riguarda la Direzione, Reda-
zione, Amministrazione rivolgersi a: Prof. M.Levi
Bianchini, Nocera Superiore (Salerno) Italia.

International Psychoanalytical Press

To appear shortly:

Addresses on Psycho Analysis

James Jackson Putnam

(23 Selected Papers on Psycho-Analysis)

C. H. STOELTING CO.

PSYCHOLOGICAL
APPARATUS and SUPPLIES

We are now in a position to accept apparatus
and material orders for the following: .

Binet-Simon Measuring Scale for Intelligence (Goddard Revision)

Breitwieser’s “Psychological Experiments”

Brunner’s “The Psychology of Special Abilities and Disabilities”

Fernald’s “Differentiating Tests for the Defectiye Delinquent Class”

Franz’s Neurological and Psychiatric Tests
Freeman’s “Experimental Education”

Goddard’s Tests for the Grading of Backward Children
Healy’s “The Individual Delinquent”

Healy & Fernald’s “Practical Mental Classification”

Hollingsworth’s “Outlines for Experimental Psychology”

Hollingsworth’s “Vocational Psychology”

Judd’s “Psychological Experiments”

Kelley’s “A Constructive Ability Test”

Kent’s Geometrical and Colored Picture Puzzles
Knox’s U. S. Immigration Bureau Tests
Link’s “Employment Psychology”

Langfeld & Allport’s “An Elementary Laboratory Course in Psychology”

McCaUie’s Vision Tests

Meyer’s “A Text Book of Experimental Psychology”

New York State Board of Charities’ II Standardized Mental Tests (l9I5)

New York State Board of Charities’ Performance Norms for 15 Tests (l9I7)

Otis’ Group Intelligence Scale
Pintner’s “The Mental Survey”

Pintner & Paterson’s “A Scale of Performance Tests”

Porteus’ Tests for Mental Deficiency (Vineland Bevision)

Porteus & Hill’s Revised Binet-Simon Measuring Scale for Intelligence
Pyle’s “The Examination of School Children”

Seashore’s “The Psychology of Musical Talent”

Seashore’s Standardized Pitch Discrimination Forks
Stenquist’s Tests for Mechanical Ability
Strong’s Introductory Psychology for Teachers

Terman’s Revision and Extension of the Binet-Simon Measuring Scale
Thurstone’s Tests

Titchener’s Text Books and Manuals (six)

Army Mental Tests

Wallin’s Cards for Group Experiments on Visual After-Images
Wallin’s Tests for Measuring Rate of Mental Growth and Improvement
Weidensall’s Physical and Mental Tests for Criminal Women
Whipple’s “Manual of Mental and Physical Tests” (Second Edition)

Whipple’s “Selecting and Teaching Gifted Children”

Witmer’s “Analytical Psychology”

Woolley & Fisher’s Vocational Bureau Tests

Woodworth & Well’s Association Tests

Yerkes* “Point Scale for Measuring Mental Ability”

OlSTOELTINGelo:

Manufacturers, Importers and Exporters of

APPARATUS and SUPPLIES

for

Physics, Chemistry, Botany, Zoology, Physiology and Psychology

(Only manufacturers of Physiological and Psychological Apparatus in the United States)

SOST-SOiT Carroll Ave. Chicago, HI., U. S. A.

IRcgan Sggfeg xrn Pgiatftg-Enaltigtg

The Elements of Practical Psycho-Analysis. By Dr. Paul Bousfield.

Illustrated. 8vo. About 8/6 net. (June

The first practical book by a practising English physician.

Ch. I: The Unconscious Mind; II: Desires and Psychic Energy; HI: Evo¬
lution of Erotic Desire; IV: Fate of Erotic Impulses and Erotic Aims;
V: Parental Complexes; VI: Narcissism; VII: Dreams; VIII: The Func¬
tional Diseases; X: Technique of Psycho-Analysis; XI: Analysis of
a Compulsion Neurosis with Paranoid Symptoms; XII: Critici^s of
Psycho-Analysis; XIII: Scope of Psycho-Analysis. Glossary of Terms.

Psychoanalysis: its History, Theory and Practice. By Andr6 Ti’idon,

with a Copious Bibliography. About 6/-- net. (Shortly

An excellent introductory book, involving no prior acquaintance with the subject,
yet a very comprehensive survey of it.

The Psychology of Dreams. By W. S. Walsh, M.D., Member Amer.

Medico-Psych. Assoc., etc. About 15/— net. (Shortly

Intended for the General Reader, and written in language that everyone can underst^d,
the author explains how Morbid Dreads, Compulsions, Worries, etc., are caused, how
they may be prevented, and how they are often cured by a study of Dreams.

Problems of the Nervous Child. By Elida Evans. With introduction by
Dr. C. G. Jung, of Zurich. 8vo. About 10/6 (Shortly

After many years’ experience in analysing nervous patients according to the me¬
thods of JUNG (of whom she is a pupil), Mrs. Evans presents a vivid account of
the vitally important pai*t played in the life of the adult by a mentally unwhole¬
some environment in which the individual grew up as a child.

BY WILFRID LAY, PH.D.

Man’s Unconscious Conflict: a Popular Exposition of Psycho-Analysis.

8 VO. 10/6 net.

“There has been a long demand for a popular exposition of the Freudian-Jung
theories of the nature and functions of the Unconscious, and this book exactly
meets the need.” — Journal of Education.

The Child’s Unconscious Mind. svo. lo/— net.

This book supplies the most important original treatment in English, couched in
a popular yet accurate form, of the Unconscious factor in education in the Home,

the School, and the World.

Psyeholog-y of the Normal and Subnormal. By H. H. Goddard,

A., Ph. D., Director Ohio Bureau of Juvenile Research; formerly Director Vineland
Laboratory for the Investigation of Feeblemindedness. Lge. Svo, with 48 plates
and figs, on art-paper, Bibliography, and Index. 25/— net.

PREVIOUS PUBLICATIONS AND IMPORTATIONS OF PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL BOOKS
Adler (Dr. A.) The Neurotic Constitution (New edn. shortly

Bruce (H. A.) Handicaps of Childhood. 7/6 net

A scientific study of the child’s psychical and physical relations. The various
aspects of the child's consciousness are analysed and carefully detailed in relation
to corrective and educative measures. Mental Backwardness, Sulkiness, Jealousy,
Selfishness, Bashfulness, Stammering, Night Terrors, Children’s Reading, etc.

Coriat (I. H.) M.D., What is Psycho-Analysis? 3/6 net.

Freud (Dr. S.) Totem and Taboo : Resemblances between the Psychic Lives
of Savages and Neurotics. Translated by Prof. A. A. Brill, Ph. B., M. D., Lecturer
in Psycho-Analysis and Abnormal Psychology, N. Y. University. 10/6 net.

Jung (C. G.) M.D., Psychology of the Unconscious: a Study of the

Transformations and Symbolisms of the Libido. 25/— net.

Parmelee (M.) Ph.D., Personality and Conduct. (New edn. shortly
Pfister (Dr. 0.) The Psycho-Analytical Method. 25 /— net.

The Power of Music and the Healing Art. By G. C. Rotheiy. 2/6 net.
Not a Psycho-Analytical book; but suggestive for that point of view. _

Kegan Paul, Trench, Trnbner & Co., Ltd.: Broadway House, 68-74 Carter Lane, E. C.

THE INTERNATIONAL PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL

LIBRARY

Edited by Ernest Jones

In the Press:

1. Addresses on Psycho-Analysis, by Dr. J. J. PUTNAM.

2. Psycho-Analysis and War Neuroses, A Symposium, by Drs. KARL
ABRAHAM (Berlin), S. FERENCZI (Budapest), ERNEST JONES
(London), ERNST SIMMEL (Berlin), with an Introduction by Prof.
SIGM. FREUD (Vienna).

3. The Psycho-Analytic Study of the Family, by J. C. FLUGEL, B. A.

4. Technique in Psycho-Analysis, by Prof. SIGM. FREUD.

5. Studies in Dreams and Allied Topics, by Dr. OTTO RANK.

INTERNATIONALE PSYCHOANALYTISCHE

BIBLIOTHEK

1. Zur Psychoanalyse der Kriegsneurosen. Diskussion mit Beitragen von
Prof. FREUD, Dr. ABRAHAM, Dr. FERENCZI, Dr. ERNEST
JONES, Dr. SIMMEL. Price 3/-.

2. Hysterie und Pathoneurosen, von Dr. S. FERENCZI. Price 3/—.

3. Zur Psychopathologie des Alltagslebens, von Prof. SIGM. FREUD.
6th. Edition. Revised and Enlarged. Price 12/6.

4. Psychoanalytische Beitrage zur Mythenforschung, von Dr. OTTO
RANK. Price 15/—.

5. Probleme der Religionspsychologie, I. Teil: Das Ritual, von Dr.
THEODOR REIK. Price 12/6.

6. Spiegelzauber, von Dr. G6ZA r 6HEIM. Price 7/6.

7. Gottfried Keller, von Dr. EDUARD HITSCHMANN. Price 7/6.

INTERN. ZEITSCHRIFT FOR PSYCHO-ANALYSE

and

IMAGO

the two Official Organs in German of the International Psycho-Analy¬
tical Association. The price of each is £ 1.5.0 or S 5.00, members of
the Association paying only four-fifths of this.

Orders and subscriptions should be addressed to

THE

INTERNATIONAL PSYCHO-ANALYTICAL PRESS

45 New Cavendish Street, London, W. 1
or to PUBLICITY DIRECTION, 19 East 48th. Street, New York.

A full prospectus will be sent on application.

CONTENTS

vmm

PAGE

OPEN LETTER by DR. S. Ferenczi . . . . . . 1

EDITORIAL.. . ... 3

Dr. JAMES JACKSON PUTNAM : Obituary.6

FREUD, SIGM., M.D., LL.D. One of the Difficulties of Psycho-

Analysis . . . . . . . 17

BRYAN, DR. DOUGLAS. Freud's Psychology ....

READ, C. STANFORD, M.D. Review of the Recent Psycho-
Analytical Literature in English . . . . .

REPORTS of the International Psycho-Analytical Association

■■f

;#S

'■ - i-

I A

[ft

114

SOCIETY FOR GRAPHIC INDUSTRY.
PRINTED IN VIENNA.

Internet Archive Audio

Featured

Top

Images

Featured

Top

Software

Featured

Top

Books

Featured

Top

Video

Featured

Top

Mobile Apps

Browser Extensions

Archive-It Subscription

Save Page Now

Full text of "The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis I 1920 Part 1"

See other formats