(navigation image)
Home American Libraries | Canadian Libraries | Universal Library | Community Texts | Project Gutenberg | Children's Library | Biodiversity Heritage Library | Additional Collections
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload
See other formats

Full text of "Man In The Modern World"

MAN IN THE MODERN WORLD

There are many other ways in which the big animal inevitably
fails to be a mere scale enlargement of its smaller relatives. The
relative size of many organs decreases instead of increasing with total
absolute bulk, so that in a big animal they do not have to be pro-
portionately so large as in a small one. Relative wing-size is a case
in point.
Then everyone knows the small-eyed look of an elephant, or, still
more, of a whale. To obtain a good image, an eye has to be of a
certain absolute size: this is because the image even in our own eyes
is really a mosaic, each sensory cell in the retina behaving as a unit.
The image we see is built up out of unitary spots of colour, just as a
half-tone picture in a newspaper is built up out of combinations of
single black and white dots. To give an image of a reasonably large
field, they must be numerous. Once a certain absolute size of eye is
reached, any advantage due to further enlargement is more than
counterbalanced by the material used and the difficulties of construc-
tion, just as very little advantage is to be gained in photography by
making a camera over full-plate size. Even in a giraffe, which has an
exceptionally large eye for a big animal, the eye's relative weight is
small compared with that of a rat.
Most sense-organs behave in a similar way. This is especially true
of the organs of touch and temperature in the skin. It matters to a
mouse to be able to deal with things the size of breadcrumbs. But
such trivialities do not concern an elephant; the elephant accordingly
can, and does, have its skin sense-organs much more thinly spread
over its surface.
This in turn has an effect on the size of the nervous system; for the
fewer the sense-organs, the fewer sensory nerve-cells are needed, and
the smaller the size of the ganglia on the spinal nerve-roots which are
composed of sensory nerve-cells. Since the sense-organs of touch are
distributed over the surface, we should only expect these ganglia to
grow proportionately to surface, and not to bulk, even if the sense-
organs were as thickly scattered over the skin of a big as of a small
animal; but as they are more sparsely scattered in the big animal the
weight of a ganglion does not even keep up with the size of the ani-
mal's surface, and its growth is actually only just more than pro-
portional to the square root of the weight.
As a matter of fact, when the nervous system as a whole, or the
brain by itself, is compared in a series of related mammals or birds of
different size, it is found to increase only about as fast as the surface,
80