Skip to main content

Full text of "NLBW32_78"

See other formats


* 



Newsletter for 
Birdwatchers 



Vol.32 N0..7&8 



July - August 1992 



/ujt i^fcfi&K -eft 'Jjud) 




WORLD ROUND-UP 



JUNIN GREBE NEWS 

A visit by ornithologists to Lake Junin in 
Peru, only home to one of the most 
threatened birds in the world, the Junin 
Grebe Podiceps taczanowskii , has not 
brought encouraging news. Due to 
terrorist activity, there has been little 
recent information on thisspecies, mak- 
ing this visit by Thomas Valqui and 
Javier Barrio, Peruvian ornithologists 
workingforlCBP (funded by the Dillon 
Ripley Fund) particularly significant. 

In 1987, it was estimated that the 
Junin Grebe population had declined 
to 200-300 birds, and the species was 
identified by the 1990 ICBP World 
Conference as one of 1 3 birds urgently 
requiring individual attention. 

Although unable to make a popula- 
tion estimate on their short visit, Valqui 
and Barrio were horrified to find two 
(possibly three) dead birds on a 2 km 
stretch of shore in three days. Discus- 
sions with a local fisherman revealed 




~Y 



Dead junin Grebes are washed-up regularly on 

that this death toll was not unusual. 

The chief cause of the decline of the 
species is believed to be pollution from 
mining activities, and changes in the 
lake's water level due to a hydroelectric 
plant that supplies the mine. The area 
is also experiencing an exceptionally 
dry period and other wildlife of the lake 



the shores of the lake (Photo: T. Valqui/ICBP) 

is also suffering, with dead fish and 
birds found frequently. 

The political situation continues to 
make any work difficult, but Valqui and 
Barrio are planning to return to Lake 
Junin in July to assess the situation fully 
and determine what can be done to 
save this species. 



CM 
O 

o- 

(D 

c 

D 



o 
a 

1 



O 

U 




Amani Sunbird, one of the threatened spe- 
cies recorded by the team in the Udzungwa 
Mountains (Painting: N. Arlott) 



NEW SPECIES IN TANZANIA 

A new species of francolin has been 
discovered in Tanzania by a team of 
Danish ornithologists. The new bird, 
yet to be named, was found in forests 
on the Udzungwa Mountains, eastern 
Tanzania. The bird does not appear to 
be closely related to any other species 
in the genus, being very distinctive in 
appearance and the type of habitat in 
which it was found (montane forest). 
The bird was found during ten months 
fieldwork by four Danish students, Lars 
Dinesen, Louis Hansen, Thomas 
Lehmberg and Jens Otto Svendsen. 
Their work was part of a Danish re- 
search programme on the Eastern Arc 
Mountains of Tanzania, led by Jon 
Fjeldsa. 



The remote inaccessible Udzungwa 
Mountains are very little known 
ornithologically. As well as the new 
species, the team recorded four threat- 
ened endemic species (Iringa Ground 
Robin Dryocichloides lowei, Banded 
Green Sunbird Anthreptes rubritorques, 
Rufous-winged Sunbird Nectarinia 
rufipennis and Tanzanian Mountain 
Weaver Ploceus nicolli), and three other 
threatened species (Swynnerton's For- 
est Robin Swynnertonia swynnertoni, 
Dappled Mountain Robin Modulatrix 
orostruthus and Amani Sunbird 
Anthreptes pallidigaster). This work has 
served to confirm the importance of the 
Udzungwa Mountains for endemic and 
threatened birds, and underlines the 
significance of the recently gazetted 
Udzungwa Mountains National Park. 



CYPRUS BAN HOLDS FIRM 

Last year President Vassiliou of Cyprus 
took the brave decision, withstanding 
intensive lobbying by the huntingcom- 
munity, to ban the spring shooting of 
migratory birds. The ban has also been 
upheld this year, despite considerable 
pressure from the hunting associations, 



and an approaching general election. 
President Vassiliou has informed the 
hunting groups that there is no question 
of the government changing its mind. 
At ICBP's European Continental Sec- 
tion Conference it was decided that a 
strong letter of support should be sent 
to the President, congratulating him on 
his government's position. 




Cypriot children are encouraged to watch 
birds rather than shoot them (Photo: ICBP) 






Vol. 32 



No. 7 & 8 July - August 1992 Correspondence 



CONTENTS 
Editorial 

• Kihim 

• A Vulture Eating Community 

• White Winged Wood Duck 

• Captive Breeding of Endangered Birds 

• Obituaries 

• The Ornithological Society of India 
Articles 

• The Status of the White Winged Wood Duck in N E 
India, by Bibhab Kumar Talukdar 

• Vultures Endangered in Cuntur.and Prakasam 
Districts, by K Mrutyumjaya Rao 

• Observation of a Colour Banded-Demoiselle Crane in 
Gujarat, by Taej Mundkur 

• Birding at the Adayar Estuary, by B Rajasekhar 

• The Lesser Coucal - A less-known Bird, by V 
Santharam and P O Nameer 

• Distribution of Painted Spurfowl in Karnataka, by J 
N Prasad, S Karthikeyan, T S Srinivasa, S 
Subramanya and L Shyamal 

• Bird Ringing in Kodaikanal, by S Balachandran 

• The Night Heron, by Thomas F Martin 
Interesting Sightings 

• Occurrence of the Hobby in Bangalore, by M S 
Jayanth, G S Aditya and J Hemanth 

• Koras Display, by C Susanthakumar 

• Alpine Swifts over Madurai, by Kumaran 
Sathasivam 

• Orangcbilled Jungle Myna in the Plains of Upper 
Assam, by D Barooah 

• The Jungle Myna with Bluish Iris sighted in Dharwad 
Urban, by J C Uttangi 

• Range Extension of the Rubythroat in South India, by 
K K Mohapatra and Prakash Rao 

• Nesting of the White Eyed Buzzard-Eagle in 
Pudukudi, Tanjavur Dt, by P Gnanaselvan 

• Sighting of Skimmer at Najafgarh, Delhi, by Vivek 
Menon and Tara Gandhi 

• Sighting of the Great Whitebellied Heron in Jamjing 
Reserve Forest, Assam, by Anwarduddin 
Choudhury 

• Sighting of the Rufous-bellied Hawk Eagle 
at Kavikalgandi, Chickmagalur District, 
by S Karthikeyan 



• The Blueheaded Rock Thrush, by Pamela C 
Rasmussen and J S Serrao 

• Agonostic Behaviour of the Blacknecked Crane in 
Chushul, Ladakh, by S Asad Akhtar 

• Nesting of Redwattled Lapwing, by Satish Kumar 
Sharma 

• Comments on Recent Issues of the Newsletter, by V 
Santharam 

• Yellowthroated Bulbul in the Anaimalai Hills, by R 
Kannan 

• Scientific Notes, by T V Jose 

• Recommendations for Action on threatened 
Waterfowl Species in South and West Asia 

Editorial 
Kihim 

Most readers of this Newsletter must have acquired 
considerable information about Kihim, the seaside village 
on the mainland across Bombay harbour, where Salim Ali 
first discovered the secrets of the nesting habits of the Baya 
Weaver Bird. During a recent visit to Kihim (3rd to 29th 
May) I looked over the " AKHBAR BOOK" in which I know 
that Salim had written many notes relating to the birds of 
the area. Both for their historical value, and for their 
intrinsic merit, I thought it would be worthwhile 
reproducing a few of these in the Newsletter. I do so with 
a few explanations. I had hoped that it would be possible 
to reproduce some notes in facsimile because his 
handwriting is so handsome. Unfortunately, white ants 
have done considerable damage to the pages — some of the 
crucial ones — so reproduction is not possible. But a section 
of one page is reproduced in this issue. I quote :— 

"I shall confine myself merely to certain happenings in 
the sphere of local ornithology. There is nothing unusual 
in the happenings but they will be interesting records after 
50 years. The generation now in the bud, of whom I have 
high hopes will find them so (- 1 hope). It is rather early as 
yet to say how many, and which, of the youngsters who are 
enthusiastic at the moment will stay the course and grow 
old with the same keenness for birds. I feel certain, 
however, that even if most of them fall by the wayside they 
will at least be able to bequeath to their children and 
grand-children the correct prescription for telling a 
woodpecker from a duck. This in itself will be a definite 
advance...." (Several of the youngsters named by Salim 
have in fact become keen birdwatchers. Editor.) 

"A pair of Honey Buzzards had been nesting between 
"YALI" and "RETREAT", two houses on the beach, for the 
last twelve years to my knowledge - but never more than 



Newsletter for Birdwatchers 



ifrri 






Sm^a/t 



/{to. 



>/ 



'- r (-0% 






J 



fc {.<*■) 



! 



\A)to-a 

it*. 



<j /it^/^-'^] /leaf 4 



[MV ,/*- ,<*-«. a_C£lO 



I 0»h.t(t 



■U.C8 






10i^< 



,u 



'/{ 



It 







<Wl 






3 /Jiji* 



k <fftici- A-ris A^- 
4tf«r» ccHi-^/lJ' it 4 Sj«t*l 



a, A.ud Kti (Mti 






bWs led Ihnijtd. i*\ }<* 



"1 



5* 






4<fool 



M£ io4L.t 



ml t 



*f 



sluf«\d 






4 thy ecu, 



fic.Z 



!*«.* n. 



i 



eni . 



A_ 



»i;t» 



'** 



JA0» A.-S0H4 



50 l/v>. fl^Jo m 






t Ktlti 



L 



k 






*" u Jl.\. U 



'Lt 



H'*J 



SUA Hi etc 



A. 



X.A. 



c^vt rkty jllicc 



da 



«t 7X\-Ji,\ ■*. 



one pair. On 10th May, a 14 day old chick from this year's 
nest in "Retreat" compound was ringed. If it grows up, it 
may furnish some clue as regards the nesting pair next year. 
Does the same pair nest here year after year? Is its place 
taken in part or wholly by the (new) born youngsters? Or 
do altogether new birds occupy the place, and what 
happens to the yearly progeny? The same problem needs 
solving re the "YAL1" pair of Whitebellicd Sea Eagles. 
Rajah, the emeritus "YALI" mali, tells me he has seen "this" 
pair nesting every year in the same place since he was a boy 
- over 50 years ago. Never has he seen more than this one 
pair about, and never have they succeeded in raising a 
family! "Let the credit rest with the relator" as Babar would 
have said, but the matter is not without strangeness and 
certainly worthy of investigation. This season (i.e. 
December 1942) the Eagles had shifted to a Casuarina in the 



S.W. corner of Shahinda's 
land. There were two eggs 
in the nest - about 100 ft. 
up - which vanished after 
a week or so - rather 
unaccountably. 
Thereafter the birds lost 
interest in the nest but 
they are still in the same 
neighbourhood. The 
desertion by the Eagles of 
their age-long nest site - 
the beehive Casuarina 
above the well N of Yali 
Bungalow - was 
undoubtedly due to the 
large influx of 

White-backed Vultures 
that suddenly took a fancy 
to Yali compound, and 
cluttered all the fine 
Casuarinas with their 
large and filthy nests. The 
ire of the "Squire" was 
justly aroused. 

He loaded his gun 
And slew a dozen 

which sent the rest 
a — packing. It is hoped 
that the Sea Eagles will 
now return." 



All this is getting too 
long - so here are a few 
items in brief. 2 flocks 
Flamingoes (50 and 26) 
flying N - 23 April. 2 pairs 
Green Bee-eaters and 1 

White-breasted Kingfisher nesting in "Al Murad" 

compound. 

1 Fulvous Fruit Bat (Rousettus Leschentaulti ) ringed by 
me in April (43) in an old cave in Elephanta. It was found 
struggling with black ants by Shamoon in Tali' compound 
on 13th May. Believe it or not. Pitta 1, Blue-cheeked (or 
Blue-tailed?) Bee- eaters appeared overnight 24th and 19th 
May respectively, after rainy and stormy nights. 

Last Blyth's Reed-Warbler at Bhombar 25 May. 1 pair 
Quaker Babblers, for first time ever near "Latifia" 12 - 19 
May 



Arr. 23 April 
Dep. 28 May 



Sd/-SalimAli 
27 May 1943 



Newsletter for Birdwatchers 



1 A Vulture Eating Community 

The article by K M Rao about vultures being eaten in 
A.P. shows the strong digestive systems of some people. 
The vulture is well known for its ability to relish and 
survive on putrid flesh, but apparently the metabolism of 
the vulture converts decomposed flesh into palatable meat. 
It will be a pity if vultures are killed for their meat. Who 
will then do the scavenging? 

White Winged Wood Duck 

In his article B K Talukdar gives cheering news about 
protective measures for the W W W Duck. He refers to 
Jerdon's reference to the bird in the Birds of India published 
in 1864. In Jerdon's days the bird was known as Casarca 
Leucopters. I saw a pair of these birds in Slimbridge in 1972 
at the Wildfowl Trust. Assamese tropical conditions were 
beautifully simulated under the direction of Sir Peter Scott 
who was responsible for the captive breeding project. It 
would be appreciated if some reader of this Newsletter in 
England would give us the latest news about this captive 
breeding effort. 

Captive Breeding of Endangered Birds 

Captive breeding of endangered birds with the object of 
releasing them in the wild is leading to some remarkable 
successes. Aamir AH, 14 Ch. de la Tourelle, 1209 Geneva, 
writes : 

"Zafar will be interested to know that last Sunday I went 
on an outing with the Zoological Society of Geneva to see 
the Lammergeiers that have been released in the French 
Alps. We were lucky and saw four. The leader of our outing 
had been associated with the release of these birds and so 
not only knew where to look for them but knew the 
individuals by name. One bird is kept in a cage in an old 
farmhouse because it seems he refuses to reproduce and 
shows no interest in females of the species; they think he 
has got too used to human beings and a quiet life and 
* would not be able to fend for itself in the wild. 

We saw one of the birds dropping a bone on stones to 
break it; all very thrilling." 

Many years ago I saw a Lammergeier in Mussoorie 
carry away and drop a bone. The birds in Mussoorie had 
better watch out and multiply, otherwise they will be 
subjected to captive breeding! 

Obituaries 

It is with very great regret that we learnt about the death 
of Prof. K.K. Neelakantan, Prof. Ramesh M. Naik. and Mr. 
H.B. Papanna. Prof. Neelakantan who retired as professor 
of English, Kerala University, was the author of a 640 page 
Malayalam book on 'Birds of Kerala' published by Kerala 
Sahithya Academi, Trichur in 1958. Earlier it had appeared 
as a serial in a Malayalam daily and had delighted 



numerous readers. Prof. Neelakantan was one of the most 
competent birdwatchers of Kerala and at the time of his 
death on the 14th of June, he had just finished his work on 
the updating of Salim Ali's "Birds of Kerala". I am sure that 
some of his close associates will have the volume published 
for it is obviously going to be an important work of 
reference. 

Prof. R.M. Naik who died on 8th December 1991 in 
Rajkot, had been ailing for some time. At the time of his 
death he had just retired as the Head of the Department of 
Biosciences of Saurashtra University. 

Mr. H.B. Papanna who died on 2nd July 1992 in 
Bangalore, was an avid birdwatcher and photographer. His 
photograph of two poachers carrying away a White Stork 
shot by them, has appeared in many leading magazines. He 
had vast field experience and had collected valuable data 
on the nesting cycles of flycatchers, lapwings and 
woodpeckers. 

These three eminent ornithologists have succeeded in 
enthusing a number of their young colleagues in 
birdwatching, and this is the best memorial they leave 
behind. 

The Ornithological Society of India 

In the past issues of the Newsletter, mention has been 
made of the formation of the Ornithological Society of India 
mainly due to the determination of Dr. Mrs. Asha 
Chandola Saklani of Garhwal University. In November 
1991, an ad hoc committee was established with Dr. Saklani 
as Secretary General and Mr. Zafar Futehally as the 
President. To further this project a meeting was held in 
Bangalore on 23rd July, where over 30 senior birdwatchers, 
mainly from Bangalore, assembled to meet Dr. Saklani and 
to get her views regarding further operations. 

It was clear that this Society is meant 'to act as a 
coordinating institution to motivate and to get the best out 
from the many regional birdwatching groups which have 
come up in the last few years. If the O.S.I, can achieve its 
objective and stimulate action by its members, it could 
achieve a great deal. 

The O.S.I, would also be interested in hosting the next 
meeting of the International Ornithological Congress in 
India. This possibility is still a long way off. The next I.O.C. 
meeting will will be held in Vienna in 1994, and there are 
many countries who are interested in hosting the one in 
1998. If the O.S.I, really performs well on the ground, India 
could have the pleasure of having an eminent group of 
ornithologists of the world attending the conference here. 
The presence of eminent people from abroad will certainly 
give a great fillip to ornithological studies in India. 



Newsletter for Birdwatchers 



THE STATUS OF THE WHITE WINGED WOOD DUCK IN 

NORTH-EAST INDIA 



BIBHAB KUMAR TALUKDAR, Ever Green, Samanway Path, Survey Basishta Road, P.O. Beltola, Guwahati 781 028, Assam 



Introduction 

A ghostly wail floating sound was heard in many parts 
of Assam and Arunachal Pradesh up to 1960s. But at 
present that ghostly sound is missing gradually from the 
forests of Assam and Arunachal Pradesh. This was the call 
of the White Winged Wood Duck (Cairina scutulata). In 
Assam this duck is popularly known as Deohah (Spirit 
Duck). 

Cairina scutulata was first described by S. Muller in Java 
in 1839 and the English name, the White Winged Wood 
Duck was assigned to it by Blyth in 1849 from Burma. T.C. 
Jerdon in his book "Birds of India" in 1864 recorded the 
duck as the White Winged Shieldrake but he was not sure 
if it was found in India or only in Burma. Their range at the 
past was from western Assam through Burma, Malaysia to 
Sumatra and Java. Dr. D.R. Wells in his book "Birds of 
Malaysia" stated that there were no recent records of the 
duck in Malaysia. Though the situation in Indonesia was 
uncertain, but a decade ago Mr. Holmes has rediscovered 
this duck in South-East Sumatra. However according to Dr. 
Andy Green (1992) the WWWDuck is recorded in Sumatra 
and Java and reported to be present in six of the eight 
Sumatran provinces. In Bangladesh, the duck is reported 
from Northern and Southern Chittagong Hill tracts. In 
Vietnam only a single duck observed in 1990 mid winter 
Waterfowl counts in Nam Bai Bet Tien National Park. 

Habit and Habitat 

The WWW Duck is a large and comparatively long duck 
with black body (in case of male) and dark chestnut brown 
(in case of female), conspicuous white patches on the 
wings. The eye colour is cither red or orange. In N.E. India 
the WWW Ducks live in Tropical wet evergreen forest, 
Tropical semi-evergreen forest, Montane wet temperate 
forest, Tropical moist-deciduous forest and nearby forest 
streams, small sluggish rivers, riverpools amongst forest, 
swamps, beels and sometimes in Rice fields. This duck is 
very shy and nocturnal in their habit and it is infact very 
difficult to locate them due to its nocturnal habit. In N.E. 
India, the duck is found active from evening to early 
morning. During the day time the ducks prefer to remain 
in the dense forest and shaddy places. 

The WWW Duck nests high up in trees. Generally most 
of their nests were observed in Hollock tree (Terminalia 
myriocarpa). Sometimes the ducks also make their nest on 



the holes of Nahar tree (Mesua ferrea) and Hollong trees 
(Dipterocarpus macrocarpus) and Teak tree (Tectona grandis) 
in Assam and Arunachal Pradesh. The ducks rely on their 
natural camouflage (Mimicry) and it is very difficult to 
locate them in the gloomy variegated light of the forest. As 
the ducks fly swiftly along the beels and streams, it is often 
very difficult to estimate how far they might be or how,high 
they are or at what speed they move. At dawn, when these 
ducks are ready to fly again towards the dense forest, they 
use their vibrant wailing call to get the attention of their 
partners, so that they do not become separated in the 
gloomy variegated light of the thick jungle. 

4 
Food 

The WWW Duck generally take mollusca, small fish, 
seeds, insects, Annelids and small snakes as food. WWW 
Duck is also believed to take rice pest as food as the ducks 
were found in many occasions in the dried or burnt paddy 
field of Assam and Arunachal Pradesh. 

Conservation Measures Taken 

In 1937 the Assam Government, realising the reduction 
in the numbers of WWW Duck banned all shootings of the 
duck. In 1962 WWF listed WWW Duck as a species in 
danger of extinction. From 1975 the CCF (Assam) has 
banned all collection of ducklings and eggs from forests. 
Cairina scutulata is now one of the most endangered species 
of Anatidae in the world. This duck is also listed on 
Appendix 1 of the Convention of International Trade in 
Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). 
WWW Duck is listed in IUCN Red List of Threatened * 
Animals as vulnerable. But the duck should be upgraded 
to the status of endangered duck in the world as its 
population is decreasing very rapidly. The WWW Duck is 
also listed in Schedule I of Indian Wildlife Protection Act, 
1972. 

Present Status 

In Assam, the Dibru-saikhowa Reserved forest was 
declared as Wildlife Sanctuary in the year 1986 to protect 
the WWW Duck. Dibru-saikhowa is a primarily riverain 
area which includes within its limit the merging of lofty 
Lohit and Debang rivers to form the mighty Brahmaputra. 
This is truly wild area comprising very dense moist forest 
formations and large expanses of marshland, with tall reed 
salix associations making it a safe haven for the extremely 
endangered WWW Duck. 



% 



Newsletter for Birdwatchers 







i f ffl rf 



V 



v r \ » / 

> l 

• U 

■ v v 



■+. 



Mop showing the current range of Wliite winged ducks 



But in October 1989, in the same Dibru-saikhowa, the 
WWW Duck was threatened with extinction, as the Assam 
Government decided to lease out fishery mahals inside this 
wildlife sanctuary. At this time to rescue the WWW Duck 
from a possible extinction, Aaranyak Nature Club of 
Guwahati came forward and filed a writ petition at Gauhati 
High Court against the decision of the State Government 
to lease out fishery mahals inside the Dibru-saikhowa 
wildlife sanctuary. Aaranyak Nature Club accused the 
State Government of violating the Article 48 (A) and 51 A 
(g) of the Constitution of India, Wildlife Protection Act, 
1972, Forest Conservation Act 1980 and Environment 
Protection Act 1986. Due to the legal cum publicity efforts 
of the Club, the State Government had to cancel the 
damaging decision of leasing out fishery mahals in Dibru- 
saikhowa Wildlife Sanctuary with effect from 1st April 
1990. Due to the Aaranyak's initiative, the WWW Duck is 
now safe in Dibru- saikhowa Wildlife Sanctuary. In Assam 
the WWW Duck is confined to Dibrugarh, Tinsukia and 
Lakhimpur and Dhemaji Districts and may be at Cachar, 
Hailakandi and North Cachar Districts. 

In Arunachal Pradesh the WWW Duck is reported 
mainly from Siang, Dibang and Tirap Valley. The 



Namdapha National Park, Mehao Wildlife Sanctuary and 
D'Ering Memorial Wildlife Sanctuary of Arunachal 
Pradesh provide shelters to this retiring species of 
Anatidae. 

Within N.E. India, Assam and Arunachal Pradesh 
provides shelter to the most endangered WWW Duck. But 
the strong possibilities to find this bird in other states of 
N.E. India cannot be ruled out. Mainly the Innerlinc forest 
of Assam along the border of Manipur, Nagaland and 
Mizoram, may have the WWW Duck, a controversy which 
is yet to be solved by detailed field survey. This doubt arose 
when the author found two WWW Duck in the Jiri Forest 
of Assam which is situated near the Manipur Border. 

Since 1989, the WWW Duck are mainly observed in the 
following places of N.E. India : 



Location 



Coordinates 



Slate 



Dibru-saikhowa WL Sanct. 


27.40N, 95.241- Assam 


Phillobari Reserve Forest 


27.31N, 95.42H Assam 


Joypoore Reserve Forest 


27.14N,95.24E Assam 


Bordubi Tea Estate 


27.35N, 95-41 E Assam 


Jiri Reserve Forest 


24.55N, 93.161-: Assam 


Doomdooma Reserve Forest 


27.36N, 95.42E Assam 


Subansiri River 


27.31N, 94.171- Assam 


Dholajan 


27.46N, 95.28E Assam 


Namdapha National Park 


27.30N, 96.20E Arunachal 




Pradesh 


Mehao WL Sanctuary 


28.15N, 95.42E Arunachal 




Pradesh 


D'Ering WL Sanctuary 


27.55N, 95.25E Arunachal 




Pradesh 



In addition to the above sites, some unconfirmed report 
reveals that WWW Duck may also be found in the 
following places : 

1. Innerline Reserved Forest along Manipur, Nagaland 
& Mizoram 

2. Barail and North Cachar Hills Reserved Forest 
specially in the area known as Bombaithal. 

3. River Dhaleswari in Hailakandi District of Assam. 

4. Namchick Reserved Forest in Dibrugarh District of 
Assam. 

5. Upper Noa Dihing of Arunachal Pradesh. 

6. Pasighat area of Arunachal Pradesh. 
Measures Needed to Save WWW Duck 

The following measures will play important role in the 
protection and conservation of WWW Duck in N.E. India 
specially in Assam and Arunachal Pradesh. 



FrAMnfefan 



1 . WWW Duck should be declared as the State Bird of 
Assam immediately and this act will help in the 
conservation awareness to protect and preserve this 
retiring species of Anatidae. 

2. Strict enforcement of the Wildlife Protection Act, 
1972 in Assam and Arunachal Pradesh, WWW Duck 
being included in the Schedule I species. 

Unfortunately till date Assam has not made a 
Wildlife Protection Rule! 



Creation of more protected forest aeas where the 
WWW Duck are found. The key sites of WWW Duck 
should be brought under the purview of the Wildlife 
Protection Act, 1972. 

4. A detailed survey of WWW Duck in N.E. India is the 
crying need of the hour to get an idea about its 
estimated population. 

5. Awareness program should be initiated to 
discourage hunting of WWW Duck in N.E. India. 



VULTURES ENDANGERED IN GUNTUR AND PRAKASAM 
DISTRICTS (AP) and VULTURE EATING COMMUNITY 



KOKA MRUTYUNIAYA RAO, WB-1-15, Raja Sekhara Rao Pet, Bapatla 522 101, A P 



Ever since I came to Bapatla in 1981 I could not see 
vultures in and around Bapatla and surrounding villages. 
Bapatla is a town in Guntur district of Andhra Pradesh 
about 80 km from Vijayawada on the Vijayawada-Madras 
railway line. However, I often found carcasses (with the 
skin stripped) left for stray dogs and crows. Enquiries 
revealed that there is a community named "Banda" locally 
called Bandollu. The banda community eats vultures, 
crows and other carrion eating birds. They do not catch or 
hunt other species of birds including waterfowl such as 
ducks, egrets, storks, etc. 

I came to know that at present only a few families are 
residing at Ammanabrolu in Prakasam district 50 km from 
Bapatla. I went there on 27.6.90 and 14.7.90 and met an old 
man named Kathula Venkaiah aged 75 years. He said there 
are eight families at Ammanabrolu and about 300 families 
in Guntur and Prakasm districts. He said even at 
Ammanabrolu and surrounding villages vultures are not 
seen for the last 10 to 12 years. As the vultures were not 
available, the vulture catching nets were kept in a corner of 
the house and the nets were completely worn out. At the 
time when I met Venkaiah, his grandson, about 10 years 
old, brought two crow chicks from a crow nest to consume 
them. Venkaiah along with his other community men used 
to catch vultures not only at Ammanabrolu and 
surrounding villages, but also at Konijetikonda, 
Kodisenakonda and at Boyanakonda far from his place 
which are near Chilakaluripet and Narasaraopet in Guntur 
district. 

He said the vultures used to nest at Konijetikonda, 
Kodisenakonda and Boyanakonda hills, and he describes 
the nesting procedure as follows. In cliffs and rocky slopes 
wherever they find a little place in between rocks, the 
vultures gather four twigs and put them in a cross form, 



such that two twigs are parallel and the other two twigs 
perpendicular to the first two. These are covered with mud 
and the bird lays only one egg. Not only on cliffs and rocky 
slopes but they build even on the ground of a rocky valley 
in the same manner. The Banda community people with 
the help of ropes will get down to the spot to collect the 
eggs and chicks. 

Not only eating the vultures, but also consuming the 
eggs and chicks, is one of the major causes for vultures to 
become endangered in the Guntur and Prakasam districts. 




. 



Newsletter for Birdwatchers 



Tilt Nf I (or / Catching Vulluro 




A. B. C. D = Bdmtxu Slicks \ / 1 ,2,3.4.5,6.7. » Wooden Spike's 




For further enquiry and investigation I sent a person to 
Chilakaluripet. He found one Banda family at 
Chilakaluripet and learnt the vultures at present are not 
nesting at Konigetikonda and at Kodisenakonda, and they 
have not been seen for the last ten years at Chilakaluripeta 
area. There is a report from the Village Development 
Officer that she has observed 4 to 5 vultures after a cyclone, 
eating a buffalo carcass on the outskirts of Bapatla. (The 
cyclone was on 9.5.90 and f 0.5.90). After the cyclone I found 
several carcasses eaten by stray dogs and crows and 
, decaying by themselves and not eaten by vultures. 

Mr Venkaiah has been asked for the species of vultures 
they caught. He said now and then King Vulturess and 
Scavenger Vultures are also found in the nets. 

I took some photographs of the model net utilised for 
catching small sized prey birds. The photographs show 1) 
how the net is spread on the ground with wooden spikes, 
2) how vultures were seen in thenet after being caught. The 
net utilised for catching the vultures resembles a 
Badminton net. It is capable of catching at least ten vultures 
at a time. 

Procedure for catching the Vultures 

The sketch shows the arrangement of the net for 
catching the vultures. The net consists of 4 bamboo sticks 



A,B,C and D. The sticks C and D are 6" longer than A and 
B. The one end of A and B sticks were tied to net and the 
other ends will be tied with each other with a rope keeping 
3" to 4" gap between the sticks such that they will move 
easily while pulling the net. One end of C and D sticks tied 
to 6th and 7th spike. The other 5 corners of the net will be 
tied to the wooden spikes 1,2,3,4 and 5. There is a rope 
about 20 meters length continued from the net. 

The trapper will sit at the end of the 20 meter rope such 
that the trapper will not be visible making a bush or other 
article as a hide. The No.lspike, the rope and the trapper 
lie in straight line. A groove about 1" to 2" depth was dug 
along the net and the net is kept in the groove and covered 
with sand and soil. The sticks and the spikes are also 
covered with sand and soil. Big pieces of buffalo meat or 
small parts of a dead animal are kept in the centre of the net 
as a bait. Sometimes if the carcase is of sufficient size the 
net will be spread around it. After arrival or gathering of 
Vultures, about 10 numbers near the bait, the rope will be 
pulled. The net will form as a tent shape and vultures will 
be caught in the net. 

Further study is required to get the status and breeding 
places of vultures in the coastal districts of Andhra 
Pradesh. 



Newsletter for Birdwatchers 



OBSERVATION OF A COLOUR BANDED DEMOISELLE 
CRANE IN GUJARAT, INIDA 



TAEj MUNDKUR, Waterbird and Flyway Projects Officer, AWB, University of Malaya, Lembah Pantai 59100, Malaysia 



The precise origin and migratory routes of cranes in 
India have always been a mystery. What is known is that 
Demoiselle Crane Anthropoides virgo and Common Crane 
Gurs grus migrate southwards into north west India over 
the mountain passes of Afghanistan and Pakistan, and 
through Nepal in the east (Ali and Ripley, 1983 Handbook). 
Cranes migrating north from Gujarat have been observed 
flying over the Great Rann of Kachchh. 

So far, ringing of cranes in India has largely been on an 
experimental basis, and attempts have recently been made 
by the Bombay Natural History Society and Saurashtra 
University in Rajkot. As far as I am aware, there have been 
no recoveries of ringed cranes i n India, and the presen t note 
deals with observations made in Gujarat of a juvenile 
Demoiselle colour banded in east Russia. 

On 10 February 1992, I visited the Nyari reservoir 
(22°15'N, 70°43'E) near Rajkot city, as part of a routinue 
check on the Indian River Terns Sterna aurantia that were 
nesting on small rock islands. Adjacent to the colony was a 
large flat island where Demoiselle and Common cranes 
roosted every afternoon during winter. 

It was late afternoon and there were about 75 
Demoiselle at the roost and several thousand more 
scattered round the rest of the muddy shores of the 
reservoir. 




Outline map of Asia with the possible direction of movement of a colour 

banded Demoiselle Crane, banded at Daursky Nature Reserve, Russia and 

observed in Rajkot, India. The boundary of the breeding range (in bold 

dashed line) is adapted from Ali and Ripley (1983, Handbook). 



Using a telescope, I scanned through the flock and was 
surprised to see one individual with a patch of red above 
the tarsal joint on the right leg. My initial thought was that 
it was fresh blood - perhaps from a gun shot or caused 
when the bird grazed against a power line. 

Moving closer to get a better view it became clear that 
the red patch was actually a red plastic band with a white 
inscription. On the left leg there was a small metal ring. The 
birds were alarmed by my approach, soon took off and flew 
across the reservoir out of close view. 

About a month later, I visited the reservoir on 24 March. 
I was fortunate enough to find this individual in the 
roosting flock again. This time it was possible to approach 
closer and note that the band was inscribed with K32. The 
number was repeated twice around the band. 

Information received through the International Crane 
Foundation, USA reveals that the individual was marked 
by Russian workers on 11 July 1990 in the Daursky Nature 
Reserve (49°9'N, 115°6'E) which is near Borun-Torey Lake 
in Transbaikalia (see map). 

Daursky is considerably further east than we had 
originally suspected our Demoiselle Cranes in Gujarat to 
originate from. A single observation such as this only allow 
us to pinpoint the origin of the individual. 

In recent years, ornothological organizations in the 
region have been using a variety of color marking 
techniques; dyes, bands, flags, and wingtags for studying 
migratory routes of birds. For larger species, it is often 
possible to see the colour mark or flag through a pair of 
binoculars. For the smaller species it would be necessary to 
use a telescope. The success of these studies depends 
completely on the reports of sightings of the birds by 
observers in the field. I would encourage fellow 
birdwatchers to keep an eye out for colour marked birds 
and report these findings, thereby contributing to very 
important studies. Sightings may be sent to the NLB, the 
BNHS or me to follow up. Many more such observations 
will be required before a clearer picture of migration routes 
emerge. 

Of added interest is the fact that three Hooded Crane 
Cms monarcha, colour-banded at the Daursky Nature 
Reserve at the same time, were observed the following 
January by staff of the Yamashina Institute of ornithology 
in a famous wintering site near Izumi City in Japan. This 
Species has very rarely been recorded in east India. 

I am grateful to Dr George Archibald of the 
International Crane Foundation in USA and Dr Kiyoaki 
Ozaki of the Yamashina Institute of Ornithology in Japan 
for providing the relevant information. 



Newsletter for Birdwatchers 



i 



BIRDING AT THE ADAYAR ESTUARY 



B. RAJASEKHAR, Type5/6A, CLRl Qtrs, Adayar, Madras 600 020 



In sharp contrast to Vcdanthangal bird sanctuary, the 
birding at the Adayar Estuary this year has been pretty bad. 
One reason for this of course was the absence of Santharam, 
who is responsible for the over 180 species listed here, 
which include some very rare ones like the Dusky Crag 
Martin, Desert Wheatear, Crab Plover, etc. However the 
poor activity this year has been mainly due to the 
denotification of the sanctuary, thus allowing for an 
increase in poaching and fishing activities. I myself 
observed on several occasions fishermen trapping birds, 
mainly Black winged Stilts. Some of the usual birds did not 
turn up this year and the rest left too early due to the heavy 
disturbances. Thus the few birdwatchers of Madras who 
until now showed some interest here, have given up all 
hopes and no longer come here on their weekends. I 
monitored the area taking frequent counts this year and 
when compared to the observations of earlier 
birdwatchers, I find that there has been a considerable 
decline. 

But what most people fail to understand is that, 
restoring the status of the sanctuary would help little to 
bring back the activity. This is because, it is not waters of 
the Estuary alone that contribute to the ecosystem, but the 
vast open fields or meadows too. These fields which serve 
as nesting as well as feeding grounds for the birds do not 
come under the sanctuary, but under private ownership. 
And with plans to construct a major complex here, all is 
lost. Already, even before any structures have come up, the 
mere presence of the workers has degraded the place to 
such an extent that so far no nesting has been observed. We 
have to wait and see how the Lapwings fare. This year there 
» were no Oystercatchers, Flamingoes or Curlews and only 



about 6 Red Shanks and far too few of the other birds. I have 
listed below the maximum numbers of birds seen this year 
at the Estuary. 

At the rate at which things are taking place, there is 
hardly anything one can do but to sit back and envy 
birdwatchers like Santharam as they narrate their 
experiences of long ago. Once he had written in a 
journal.". ...A cool breeze was blowing from the sea as 1 
walked towards...". Now all that such cool whiffs can cause 
is a shudder up your spine as the Estuary becomes yet 
another victim of mankind's greed. 

I am grateful to Santharam for having introduced me to 
the Estuary and will be thankful to all those who can help 
solve this problem. 

Anticipating the death of the sanctuary, I have done 
some video filming of the birds this year and hope that it 
will serve as a record of a sanctuary that was. 

MAXIMUM NUMBERS OF THE BIRDS SEEN HERE 
THIS YEAR (1992) 



Golden Plovers 


1623 


Little Stints 1826 


Little ringed Plover 


1263 


Black winged stilts 725 


BrownheadedGulls 


140 


Black tailed God wits 137 


Marsh sandpiper 


120 


Kentish plover 51 


Little Egrets 


39 


Sand Plover 35 


Avocets 


35 


Wood Sandpiper 7 


Redshank 


6 


Common Sandpiper 5 


Pond Heron 


3 


Median Egret 3 


White wagtail 


1 


Marsh Harrier 1 



and other common birds. 



THE LESSER COUCAL —A LESS-KNOWN BIRD 



V. SANTHARAM, C/o.Dr. P.S. Easa, Kerala Fores 
P.O.N AMEER, 1st M.Sc, (Forestry) College 

The campus of the Kerala Veterinary College, located at 
Mannuthy, six kilometers to the east of Trichur town 
encompasses an area of about 1 1 5 ha. Of this, nearly half of 
the area (55 ha) is under fodder-grass cultivation. About 40 
ha are cultivated or under orchards, the principal crops 
being paddy, banana, coconut, mango etc. The rest of the 
campus (20 ha) has buildings, roads, scrub, canals and 
ponds. The terrain is plain to hilly. Though the campus is 
highly modified by the agricultural and sylvopastoral 



t Research Institute, Peechi 680 653,Kerala and 
of Forestry, Vellanikkara 680 654, Kerala 

systems, there are a number of remnant indigenous 
moist-deciduous and evergreen tree species. The area 
surrounding the campus are mainly agricultural lands. 
Rubber plantations are seen along the eastern and southern 
boundaries of the campus. 

Despite the small area and modified vegetation, this 
campus is quite rich in birdlife. About 120 species of birds 
including 27 migrants have been recorded by Nameer. The 



70 



Newsletter for lUrdica tellers 



family cuculidac is well-represented in the campus. Seven 
of the fourteen species of cuckoos recorded in "Birds of 
Kerala" are seen here. They are: Common Koel, Common 
Hawk-Cuckoo, Indian Cuckoo, Baybanded Cuckoo, 
Plaintive Cuckoo, Grccnbilled Malkoha, Common 
Crowpheasant or Coucal and Lesser Crowpheasant. 
Among these, the last mentioned is perhaps the least 
known and, in our opinion, greatly overlooked over much 
of its range. In this note, wc describe our observations on 
the Lesser Coucal with the hope that it would also help 
others in identifying the species. 

The descriptions given in the note arc based mainly on 
our observations on 11 October, 1989, 22 August and 15 
September 1991. 

Habitat 

The Lesser Coucal (Centropus toulou) was observed 
more often in the grassy habitat provided by the fodder 
farms. It appeared to prefer areas with grass of about 1 m 
or so in height and was seldom noticed in fields where grass 
was sparse or harvested. It was seen, at times, perched on 
the small shrubs bordering the grass-lands but usually 
perched on grass stalks and also seen on the ground, 
moving among the grass. On a few occasions it was also 

Size and identification 

The Lesser Coucal is distinctly smaller and appears to 
be a "compact edition" of the larger crowpheasant. The 
proportion of the tail length in relation to the body length 
appeared smaller in the Lesser Coucal. On one occasion, we 
were able to judge the size of this coucal with a Spotted 
Dovc(.Streptopcliachinensis) perched next to itand we found 
the coucal was just about 5 cm (2 in) longer than the dove. 

In colouration, the bird resembled the Common 
Crowpheasant but with the following differences: The 
chestnut colour appeared to be duller and covered the 
wings and upper back (intra-scapular areas). Wc could not 
see the white tail-tip said to be a diagonistic feature by 
Dr.Salim Ali in 'Birds of Kerala'. This may be due to the 
broken tail-tips noticed in some of the individuals. One 
individual we saw with intact tail feathers had at least two 
central feathers dark brownish grey with irregular and pale 
white (not pure white) bands. (Stuart Baker in the "Fauna 
of British Indian Birds" mentions that the tail is "tipped 
narrowly with white or rufous and faintly cross-rayed"). 
The legs and beak were blackish and the iris appeared 
darkish (and not crimson as publications indicate). This 
may be due to the light conditions and/or the age of the- 
birds seen. 

One individual (in fact the first ever individual seen) by 
Namccr on 11 October 1989 was distinctly different in 
colouration and was perhaps a juvenile bird. It was very 
similar to the one illustrated in 'Birds of Kerala'. The 



upperparts were rufous, the ventral region being slightly 
barred. The tail was black, the beak brownish to 
flesh-coloured, iris brown to black and legs, black. 

Calls 

The birds were quite vocal, especially in the early 
morning and late evening period. Calls were uttered from 
an exposed perch-grass-stalk, bamboo, etc. The common 
call-note was a series of 5-6 "whoots". Of these, the first two 
"whoots" were uttered somewhat in a slow tempo and 
from the third "whoot", the tempo was slightly faster. 
These calls were rather weak, lacking the deep resonance 
and volume of the regular call-notes of the common 
crowpheasant. This call was rendered with the bill closed 
and the bird would bend down its head while calling. 

The second call-note heard less often could be described 
as "Kurook" (as given in the "Handbook") or as "Kulook" 
or "kirook". This invariably followed the series of 
"whoots", but many times was dispensed of. This note was 
heard in runs of 4,6,7,9 or 10. A complete set of both calls 
lasted 1 2 seconds or less in duration. These latter notes were 
somewhat remniscent of the "kutroo"calls of the Green 
Barbet, but srafiTsbifthecawyih^ Hatotatsalls were rendered 
with head raised and bill opened. Mr P.S. Sivaprasad 
successfully recorded both these calls using a parabolic 
reflector. 

Other comments 

The lesser Coucal was seen spending considerable time 
inactive, just perched, especially in the late afternoons. The 
bird was seen jerking up its wings and tail for several (5-10) 
minutes after landing on a bush and the bamboo stalk. The 
bird was not too shy and often permitted good 
observations. 

At least five pairs of Lesser Coucals are estimated to be 
present in the Mannuthy Campus. We have unconfirmed 
sight records of these birds from Periyar Tiger Reserve 
(Mangala Devi Temple area) and Silent Valley. The birds 
are also seen in the Vcllanikkara campus of the Kerala 
Agricultural Unvicrsity, close to Mannuthy. 

From our brief observations it appears that the Lesser 
Coucal prefers grasslands. Because of its superficial 
resemblance to the common crowpheasant, the bird is 
perhaps overlooked. The size, calls and, to some extent, the 
habitat should help in distinguishing the Lesser Coucal. 

Acknowledgements 

We are grateful to Prof. K.K. Neelakantan who gave 
valuable hints which helped in the critical identification of 
the Lesser Coucal. We also thank Mr. P.S. Sivaprasad who 
recorded the calls of the Lesser Coucal and accompanied 
us in the field. 






Newsletter for Birdwatchers 



U 



DISTRIBUTION OF PAINTED SPURFOWL IN KARNATAKA 



J.N. PRASAD, S. KARTHIKEYAN and T.S. SR1N1VASA, C/o. Merlin Nature Club, 13, 8th Cross, 30th Main, 

J. P. Nagar, I Phase, Bangalore 560 078 and 
S. SUBRAMANYA and L. SHYAMAL, c/o. HPHT Scheme, J-Block, University of Agricultural Sciences, 

CKVK Campus. Bangalore 560 065 

The Pairifed Spurfowl Galloperdix lunulata 
(Valenciennes) is known to occur in the entire Peninsula 
south of Ganges (Ripley, 1982), commoner in the central 
and eastern parts of the Peninsula than western (Ali and 
Ripley, 1987). Range largely overlaps and jigsaws 
confusingly with that of the Red Spurfowl G. spadicea, but 
as a rule Pained Spurfowl is more addicted to drier, rockier 
foothills and broken terrain covered with dense 
impenetrable thorn scrub (dominated by Lantana, 
Ptcrelobium, Mimosa, Acacia etc.) and Bamboo jungle (Ali 
and Ripley, 1987). 

During his survey of birds of the erstwhile Mysore State, 
Salim Ali did not come across the species anywhere in 
1939-40. Only known record of the species for present 
Karnataka State is that of Dr.Kumar D. Ghorpade (1973) at 
Sandur, Bellary District where he says it is "one of the 
commonest game birds in the forested parts of the valley 
and the hills. It often sought refuge in trees while I was 
pursuing it and I have come across the birds roosting in 
short trees well after dusk. This Spurfowl is addicted to 
gleaning spilt grain on the dusty hill roads, usually in the 
evenings". However, during visits to various places in 
Karnataka as a part of our regular bird watching trips, we 
have come across the Painted Spurfowl at many places. 
Presented below arc our observations on the species in 
these localities. 



Narasimha Devarabetta 
Banathlmari 




On 30th September 1990, while surveying the area in 
Narasimha Devarabetta Range Forest (13°42'N, 77°44'E) 
about 82 km north of Bangalore, three of us (JNP, SS and 
TSS) observed a pair of Painted Spurfowls emerging from 
between the clumps of Lemon grass Cymbopogan sp. The 
birds perched at the base of a 1 .5 m tall boulder in the shade 
of a tree and started preening. The pair was observed 
climbing a steep slope of a boulder with effortless ease to 
get to its top and started preening again. On 2nd December 
1990, another pair was flushed by two of us (JNP, SS) from 
beneath a Cassia fistula bush at the Bananthimari State 
Forest (12°34'N, 77°23'E), about 60 km south of Bangalore. 

Furtheron 18th Jauary 1991, at the Ragihalli State Forest 
(12°46'N, 77° 33'E) about 30 km south of Bangalore, a pair 
observed (JNP, SK) rummaging leaf litter amongst the 
Lantana undergrowth, flew past and landed close to the 
edge of a dry stream. Again, on 3rd February 1991 another 
pair was observed at the Madcshwara State Forest 



(12,°41'N, 77 °39'E). The pair which was foraging beneath a 
Lantana bush, crossed a stretch of open ground and 
vanished into a dense undergrowth of Lantana on seeing us 
(JNP, SK). 

At Jogimatti State Forest (14° 13'N, 76° 13'E) in 
Chitradurga district a pair was seen (by SK, TSS) on 29th 
December 1991, running across a stretch of open grass 
growth. 

On 9th January 1992, a pair was noticed outside the fort 
in Nandi Hills (13°22'N, 77° 41'E) again in the dense scrub 
on the roadside. This sighting of the species (by SK, JNP) 
also happens to be the first sighting of the species for this 
area as the same has not been met with by the earlier bird 
surveys. 

Again a pair of them were sighted (by LS) on 18-19 
J5«£ary 1991 at Sangam Valley (12°17'N, 77°26'E) near the- 

"7 



12 



confluence of the rivers Cauvery and Arkavathi in the 
Cauvery Wildlife Sanctuary. This also happens to be the 
first report of the species for the locality. 

It will be interesting to know if the species has been 
sighted in other locations in Karnataka by the readers of the 
Newsletter. 



Newsletter for Birdwatchers 



REFERENCES 

Ali,Sand S.D.Ripley (1987): Compact Handbook of the Bird sof India 
and Pakistan, (2nd edition), Oxford Univ. Press, Bombay, PP:737 

Chorpade, K.D. (1973): Preliminary notes on the Ornithology of 
Sandur, Karnataka, J.Bombay nat.I list.Soc: 70(3): 409-531 

Ripley, S.D (1982): A synopsis of the Birds of India and Pakistan (2nd 
edition), Bombay Natural History Society, Pp: 652 



BNHS RINGING ACTIVITIES AT KODAI HILLS 



S. BALACHANDRAN, Scientist, BNHS Research Station, 

The Bombay Natural History Society (BNHS) had 
carried out bird ringing at Kodai Hills during the summer 
seasons of 1970, 1982 & 1984. The Bird Migration Project 
has organised bird ringing camps both in winter and 
summer of the current season (1990-91). The objectives of 
the winter camp is to monitor the species composition of 
the Palcarctic migrants wintering in the high altitude of the 
Palni Hills. To find out the migrants passing through the 
Palni Hills during the spring passage, and also to establish 
the altitudinal movement among the resident species, bird 
ringing was carried out between April and June 1991 . 

Sampling by netting has been carried out at different 
habitats in the high altitude area of Poomparai, Berijam, 
Marian Shola and Pulavachar. The major habitats covered 
are shola forest, plantations (wattle, pine and eucalyptus) 
and clearfelled area with secondary growth. As the area 
around Poomparai have different microhabitats such as 
natural forest, scrub jungle, secondary forest and various 
plantations, maximum number of birds were caught. 

A total of 892 birds of 35 species were ringed. The 
migratory birds were caught till 10th May. Among the 
resident species, laughing thrush Garrulax jerdonii and 
white eye Zosterops palpebrosa were the abundant specie*;. 
The other common species are shortwing Brachyoptcryx 
major, verditer flycatcher Muscicapa albicaudata, black and 
orange flycatcher M. nigrorufa, blackbird Turdus merula. All 
the resident species almost completed their breeding by 
May. 12 nestlings of four species (Merops leschenaultii (4), 
Muscicapa albicaudata (2), Brachyoptcryx major (4), Saxicola 
caprata (2) were ringed in May. Higher proportion of 
juvenile laughing thrushes was caught in late May and 
early June. Most of the resident species have commenced 
their post-nuptial moult from the first week of May. 

The six migratory species caught were blyth's reed 
warbler Acrocephalus dumetorum, tickell's leaf warbler 
Phylloscopus affinis affinis, greenish leaf warbler P. 
trochiloides, largebilled leaf warbler P. magnirostris, 
rosefinch Carpodacus erythrinus and blue chat Erithacus 
brunneus. 



Vedaranyam, Thanjavur Dt. 614 810, TAMIL NADU 

Bird ringing at lower elevation 

Netting wasdoneatOothu-Pannaikadu area (1000-1 100 
above MSL) for three days. The species composition is 
entirely different from that of high altitude area. Yellow 
browed bulbul Hypsipetes indicus, greyheaded bulbul 
Pycnonotus priocephalus, rubythroated yellow bulbul P. 
melanicterusgularis, spotted babbler Pellomeum ruficeps and 
small green barbet Megalaima viridis are commonly seen 
and caught. 

Recapture 

A total of 14 birds of 7 species were recaptured which 
were ringed in 1982 and 1984 summers. The birds 
retrapped after 8 years arc laughing thrush, blackbird, 
white eye, shortwing, black and orange flycatcher and 
redwhiskered bulbul. By ringing and recapture method 
now it is established that the longevity of smaller hill birds 
like white eye and black and orange flycatcher is more than 
eight years. 

Altitudinal movement 

Jungle babbler Turdoides striatus, spotted dove 
Streptopelia chinensis and redwhiskered bulbul Pycnonotus 
jocosus were observed in good numbers at high altitude 
area (Poomparai). The absence of these species during 
November indicate their altitudinal movement, probably i 
to the lower elevation area and plains. Among the 
migratory species too, the blyth's reed warbler and 
greenish leaf warbler were scarce at Kodai Hills were 
observed in good number during April (spring passage). 

List of participants 

1. Mr S.A. Hussain, Principal investigator, Bird 
Migration Project. BNHS, Bombay. 

2. Admiral M. Awati, Chairman, Project 
Sub-Committee, BNHS. 

3. Dr. Zafar Futehally, Palni Hill Conservation Council. 

4. Dr. Rauf Ali, Palni Hill Conservation Council. 

5. Mr R. Whitaker, Crocodile Bank, Madras. 

6. Mrs. Philippa Mukherjee, Kodai International School. 

7. Mr R. Panncer Selvam, Secretary, JO, Vedaranyam. 



Newsletter for Birdwatchers 



13 



•t 



Nc 


>. Common Name 


Scientific name 


18. 


Laughing thrush 


Garrulax jerdonii 


1. 
2. 


Grey Jungle Fowl 
Spotted Dove 


Callus sonneratii 
Streptopelia chinensis 


19. 


Black and Orange 
flycatcher 


Muscicapa nigrorufa 


3. 


Chestnutheaded bee-eater Mcrops leschenaultii 


20. 


Verditer flycatcher 


Muscicapa albicaudata 


4. 


Small green barbet 


Mcgalaima viridis 


21. 


Greyheaded flycatcher 


Culicicapa ceylonensis 


5. 


Larger Golden backed 




22. 


Blyth's Reed warbler 


Acrocephalus dumetorum 




woodpecker 


Chrysocolaptes lucidus 


23. 


Largebilled leaf warbler 


Phylloscopus magnirostris 


6. 


Jungle myna 


Acridotheres fuscus 


24. 


Greenish leaf warbler 


Phylloscopus trochiloides 


7. 


Hill myna 


Gracula religiosa 


25. 


Tickell's leaf warbler 


Phylloscopus ajfinis 


8. 


Pied flycatcher shrike 


Hemipus picatus 


26. 


Shortwing 


Brachyopteryx major 


9. 


Rubythroated yellow 


Pycnonotus melanicterus 


27. 


Blue chat 


Erithacus brunneus 




bulbul 


i gularis 


28. 


Yellow cheeked tit 


Parus xanthogenys 


10 


Rcdwhiskcred bulbul 


Pycnonotus jocosus 


29. 


Vclvctfrontcd nuthatch 


Psitta frontalis 


11 


Redvented bulbul 


Pycnonotus cafer 


30. 


Pied bush chat 


Saxicola caprata 


12 


Greyheaded bulbul 


Pycnonotus priocephalus 


31. 


Blackbird 


Turdus merula 


13 


Yellowbrowed bulbul 


Hypsipetes indicus 


32. 


Tickell's flowerpecker 


Dicaeum erythrorhynchos 


14 


Black bulbul 


Hypsipetes madagascariensis 


33. 


White eye 


Zosterops palpebrosa 


15 


Spotted babbler 


Pellorneum ruficeps 


34. 


Spotted munia 


Lonchura punctulata 


16 


Scimitar babbler 


Pomatorhinus schisticeps 


35. 


Rosefinch 


Carpodacus erythrinus 


17 


Jungle babbler 


Turdoides striatus 














THE NIGHT HERON 







THOMAS F MARTIN, 12/16, Edward Road, Bangalore 560 052. 



The Night Heron Nycticorax nycticorax, as its name 
implies, is a bird that becomes active at sundown when it 
forages for its daily fare; unlike most other species of heron 
that are active during the hours of daylight. An exception 
to this nocturnal behaviour takes place during the breeding 
season when the demands of the young brood force the 
parent birds to hunt for food during the hours of daylight. 

The species have a somewhat short but dumpy 
appearance in body and neck structure, and a stumpy 
dagger-like bill; unlike the characteristic long body, neck 
* and bill of some of its relatives. Both sexes are alike and 
identified by the three long slender white plumes which 
emerge from the region of the hindneck, and the grey and 
buff-white body with the black crest and back which give 
out a dark bottle green when reflected by the rays of the 
sun. The pupils are surrounded by a diaphragm of reddish 
tinge. The colour of the feet range from a pale 
orange-yellow to a greenish yellow. The bill has a 
blackish-yellow tinge. When fully matured, the species 
attain a length of 58 cms and a wing-span of 100 cms. The 
call of the night heron is a gu ttural "whark", which the bird 
repeats at varying intervals when in flight. They may be 
seen flying singly in succession or in small flocks at a height 
of 40 metres or thereabout when passing overhead in 
silhouette. The juvenile birds have a totally different 
plumage to that of the adult birds, sporting a khaki-brown 



hue with brownish stripes on the breast and the facial skin 
exhibiting a greenish-yellow tinge. 

The night heron is not a shy bird at most times, and will 
usually permit the observer to approach quite near before 
taking to wing in that typical lumbering manner of the 
species. A very patient bird, Nycticorax nycticorax can and 
does stand motionless for hours at a time like some graven 
image in the muddy banks of a river, jheel or swamp, or on 
a small projecting boulder or stone in the water; during 
which time it maintains a strict vigil over the movements 
of the aquatic life around. With the approach of a likely 
prey, the night heron hurls itself in a fast lunge to impale 
the victim on its sharp dagger-like bill or clasp it in a 
scissors like grip. 

The species generally nest in small colonies and appear 
to have a special fancy for building their nests in a pcepul 
or Bo Tree Ficus religiosa so sacred to the Hindus and 
Buddhists, which stand amidst thinly populated hamlets 
or in small suburban townships. The nest is fashioned in 
the shape of a crude platform made of twigs and raised a 
few metres from the ground, on which the hen lays an 
average of 4 eggs and incubates them for about 21 days. The 
fledgelings begin to fly at about 6 weeks old, and become 
fully independent after 2 months when they start to fend 
for themselves. 



14 



Newsletter for Birdwatchers 



When nesting, the night herons can easily be 
distinguished by the continuous din of confused cries and 
discordant notes that they give out during their seemingly 
ceaseless quarrels over territorial rights. I mention this 
specific behaviour of the species based on my personal 
observations over a number of years at the staff housing 
colony of the Serraikella Glass Works at Kandra, located 
about 18 kilometres from the steel city of Jamshedpur in 
Bihar, where Nycticorax nycticorax would nidificate and 
breed regularly in a peepul tree standing amidst the 
aforesaid staff quarters. As to whether the species still 
resort for nesting and breeding at such locale I am not 
aware since arriving in Bangalore at the end of April 1985, 
but it would be worthwhile and of interest if any reader of 
the Newsletter who may be residing in Jamshedpur or near 
about, undertake a birdwatching trip to ascertain if the 
species still resort for nesting and breeding at the above 
mentioned place, during the months of July to October, and 
report their findings and observations in due course. 

When I was a resident of Calcutta in West Bengal, my 
encounters with the night heron were chiefly during the 
winter months when I would visit the bheris in and around 
Haroa, an outlying district township located about 60 
kilometres from Calcutta. It was in the precincts of 
Ramjaigherri bheri, about 8 kilometres down the 
fairweather road which branches off from the main 
approach road to the township of Haroa, that I was 
privileged to closely observe the ways and habits of the 
night heron during its non-breeding period. During my 
annual visits to Kandra in Bihar, where I was a guest of my 
close friend Rajan Lantz who has since passed away, I spent 
much time in viewing and studying the species at close 
quarters where they would regularly breed and roost in a 
peepul tree in the area of the staff quarters just three blocks 
away from where my dear friend was residing. 

In Bihar, the locals refer to Nycticorax nycticorax as 
"Whark" - a name obviously derived from its typical call. 
In West Bengal and Bangladesh, the local inhabitants know 
the bird by the name "Baigchoo" - a vernacular term for 
which I am unable to offer an English definition. Perhaps 
some kind reader of the Newsletter whose mother tongue 
is Bengali would oblige by intimating the English 
definition or derivative from which the term 'Baigchoo' 
stems. 



INTERESTING SIGHTINGS 



OCCURRENCE OF THE HOBBY IN 

BANGALORE. M.S. JAYANT, G.S. AD1TYA, 488, 
'Akshaya', 11th Cross, 8th Main, J.P Nagar II Phase, 
Bangalore 560 078, and /. HEMANTH, 55/71, H.B. 
Samaja Road, Basavanagudi, Bangalore 560 004 

On 17 June 1989, we were watching birds in a lightly 
wooded area with rocky outcrops at Kalkere, a place about 



17 km from Bangalore city on the Bannerghatta road. The 
wooded area consists mainly of Sal (Shorea talura) with 
other trees like Pongam (Pongamia pinnata), Tamarind 
(Tamarindus indica), Jack fruit (Artocarpus integrifolius), 
Eucalyptus and Millingtonia hortensis. 

At 1015 hrs we had just entered the wooded area when 
a falcon flashed past us, circled overhead and perched on 
a nearby Jamun tree (Syzygium sp.). The falcon remained 
there for nearly an hour and three quarters and let us 
approach it as close as 2.5 m. We were able to make a 
detailed note of its features. 

The bird was pigeon-sized with its throat being dirty 
white which deepened to fulvous, buff and rufous from 
breast downwards. The vent and thighs were rust red. The 
undcrparts were streaked black and being absent on thighs 
and vent. The black moustachial stripe was very distinct. 
The white half collar up to the nape and the white forehead 
were other notable points. The crown was black and it 
appeared darker than the rest of the upperparts. The 
colours of the bare parts were in accordance with those 
mentioned in the Handbook (Ali & Ripley, 1983). In flight, 
we noted that the rump and the upper tail-coverts were 
paler than the rest of the upperparts. 

Considering the above points, we identified the bird as 
the Hobby (Falco subbuteo). It was an adult bird. The 
identification was further confirmed with the help of Birds 
of Western Palearetic (Cramp & Simmons, 1982). 

According to Ali & Ripley (1983) the Hobby is found all 
over India up to Belgaum in the south from about 
September to March/April. As our sighting of the species 
was in mid June we think that it could have been a straggler. 
This is the first ever record of this species for Bangalore and 
the southern-most one for India. 

KORAS DISPLAY. C. SUSANTHAKUMAR, Prakrithi, , 
Peroorkada P.O., Thiruvananthapuram 695 005, Kerala * 

On the morning of 1st May 1992, during a walk on the 
bank of the Aakkulam Lake (Thiruvananthapuram, 
Kerala), 1 observed an interesting display of two 'Koras' 
(water cock) Gallicrex cinera. The Koras were running on an 
open marsh without being timid or shy. The colour of the 
two birds was brown. One bird had a yellow comb. This 
was the non-breeding plumage of the male kora. The birds 
stopped near a reed thicket and made some harsh sounds. 
Suddenly one bird jumped up from the ground up to 4 feet 
and came back quickly with partially spreading wings. The 
second bird standing near it was watching the display 
curiously. After a few minutes the second bird also jumped 
up from the ground up to 4 feet and came back in the same 
manner. The whole display lasted over 20 minutes and the 
birds were silent all through. 



• 



Newsletter for Birdwatchers 



15 



On the morning of 16th May 1992, 1 once again saw this 
display in the same patch of marsh. This time I failed to see 
the start of the display. On both these days one of the Koras 
ultimately flew off. According to bird books "the Kora is a 
very skulking bird, spending most of the day in thick 
waterside vegetation, venturing out at dusk and dawn to 
feed on crops, seeds or insects. The Kora is supposed to be 
timid and shy during the day." But at Akkulam I observed 
the birds at noon also and they did not appear to be too shy. 

ALPINE SWIFTS OVER MADURAI. KUMARAN 
SATHAS1VAM, 29, Jadamuni Koil Street, Madurai 
625001 

Any ornithologist who enjoys making lists will find 
watching birds from the centre of Madurai city a frustrating 
experience. In no time at all it seems, practically every 
species that occurs here has been put down, and the list is 
depressingly short. The 'regulars' number about half a 
... dozen, and an equal number of species occur seasonally. 
All others that find themselves on the list are those that 
have strayed into this airspace purely by chance. 

After three years of birding from this ornithological 
moonscape, one has long since given up waiting for new 
species, devoting oneself instead, to pursuits like the CBFP 
(Common Birds Familiarisation Programme). This simply 
means one spends hours on one's terrace memorizing the 
field characters of Blue Rock Pigeons, Pariah Kites and 
other birds one would normally not pay much attention to. 
So. when species Number thirty turns up, onejs 
unprepared. 

At the end of February this year, I had a very brief 
glimpse of a different bird flying near a group of House 
Swifts. I dismissed this as one of the sporadic Palm Swifts. 
Even when the same bird turned up at the same time the 
next morning, I did not realise that a 'new' species was 
» afoot. It was only on the third consecutive morning that I 
asked myself what sort of Palm Swift it was that was so 
white below and had such dark wings. 

I got several opportunities to see the Alpine Swifts again 
over the next few weeks, for it was indeed Apus melba that 
came daily in the morning over my house for a month. 
Apparently moving in a loosely spread out group, the 
swifts came overhead mostly at 8 'O' clock, sometimes as 
early as 7.20, at other times as late as 8.20. There were days 
when I did not make it upstairs at the right time and missed 
seeing them. Invariably they were heading east. The 
greatest number of Alpines I saw on any one day was five, 
but it is very likely there were more in the group as my view 
was restricted by buildings. In spite of the slow beating of 
the long, swept back wings (rather different from the rapid 
fluttering of the House Swifts) the birds went past very 



quickly. I had to be content with observations lasting just a 
few seconds each of a species which was 'new' to me. The 
Alpine Swifts seem to have stopped flying over here now 
in April. 

A series of near-daily sightings over a month in a period 
of three years makes it difficult to assign any status to the 
species. 

District" (JBNHS Vol.XLIV) is the only work I know of its 
type dealing with the region, and Nichols' records of the 
Alpine Swift in the district ("uncommon, sometimes 
solitary, sometimes as many as 20 together") all fall 
between January 27 and September 10. Nichols says that 
"in August Jerdon observed near Madura flocks 
apparently migrating eastward". Interestingly, birds taken 
here seem to belong to the race bakeri resident in Sri Lanka. 

I feel that there is a good case here for pooling of records 
of the Aline Swift through the NLBW. Of this species the 
Handbook says: "Our knowledge of the spatial foraging 
movements of these wide-ranging swifts is as yet too 
nebulous for a satisfactory evaluation of the races and their 
status within our limits". Every observation would help in 
piecing together the jigsaw-puzzle. 

THE ORANGE BILLED JUNGLE MYNA IN 
PLAINS OF UPPER ASSAM. DR. D. BAROOAH, 
Dass Pharmacy, Sibsagar 785 640, Assam. 

A small number of Orangebilled Jungle Myna are 
observed in the town of Sibsagar since 1990 specially 
around the tankofSibsagar. The bird is also present in quiet 
residential areas of the town but not in the central bazar 
area. "A Pictorial Guide to the Birds of the Indian 
Subcontinent" by Ali and Ripley describes the 
geographical location as 'Nagaland, South through 
Manipurand Mizoram to theChittagang hill tracts'. But the 
town of Sibsagar is situated in the plains of Assam, at least 
20 km from the hills of Nagaland. 

Though much alike to the Jungle Myna (Acridotheres 
fuscus) in size and shape, the Orangebilled Jungle Myna 
(Acridotheres javanicus) can be differentiated from the 
former by (1) Crome yellow coloured bill, (2) Tougher and 
larger tufts of hair of the forehead and (3) Dark grey , often 
shining body feathers. The overall picture is a more robust 
looking bird than the Jungle Myna. Moreover Orangebilled 
Jungle Myna is mostly a solitary bird, sometimes also seen 
in pairs, whereas the Jungle Myna is usually seen in small 
groups of 6-10 individuals. 

Nest building material was seen carried to the orchard 
of the Baptist Church Compound situated in the side of the 
tank of Sibsagar, but no attempt was made to locate the nest 
fearing the possibility of exposing the nest to 
unsympathetic persons. 



16 



Newsletter for Birdwatchers 



THE JUNGLE MYNA WITH BLUISH IRIS, 
SIGHTED IN DHARWAD URBAN. Dr.J.C. 
UTTANGI, 36, Mission Compound, Dharwad 580 001, 
India 

The city of Dharwad still has a green and shady 
appearance although, during the last few decades of 
urbanization it has lost quite a few orchards and many of 
its old forest trees, scrub and underwood trees have been 
cut to build houses in their place. To add to the greenery, 
other trees like Eucalyptus and Coconut are being planted 
around houses, along roads and open areas. Birds passing 
by this forested city cannot go without being attracted by a 
few fruit and shady trees which have remained due to 
controlling influence. Necessity knows no law but, 
preservation of sanctity must be recognised by every 
citizen as binding. 

On 30th April 1992, it drizzled over Dharwad city for a 
while in the evening and stopped. It was 5.30 p.m. when 
the evening sun came out to shine again. I was standing at 
the door of our house in the Mission compound and 
looking on towards the still overcast eastern sky. As I stood 
there looking, I noticed a small flock of six birds 
approaching me directly. Suddenly checking their speed 
the birds came down to perch on the electric wires just 40 
feet away from our house. Four of them sat on the upper 
wire line and the other two below it. It was interesting to 
notice that while perching the flock had managed to 
occupy a place on the wires where the five porcelain 
cup-like knobs were set on the shoulders of the pole. The 
birds looked as though they were imitating these knobs. 
Perhaps a hawk on top would mistake them for knobs. 

Thinking they were common Mynas, I reluctantly 
turned to glance at the birds but, my curiosity was aroused 
when I perceived a tuft of feathers behind their beaks. 
Having been caught in the recent drizzle the funky looking 
birds had come out to bask in the open sun. As they fell 
busy preening and pecking I got time to go inside and fetch 
my 8 x40 Super Zenith Binocular. What a fascination it was 
to see the birds sitting in that position with a dark sky 
background behind the birds and the bright sun shining 
from in front. 1 could clearly see their orange yellow beaks 
and legs and the tuft of feathers not very bushy. What was 
most fascinating to see was their bluish iris which the birds 
kept gently moving over their eye balls. It did not take time 
to identify the species. The ashy grey body and the bluish 
iris proclaimed that they were the Southern Jungle Myna, 
mahrattensis considered conspecific to Acridotheres fuscus. 
This is the first time I have seen this race within the urban 
limits of Dharwad. The Northern race has a bright yellow 
iris. The group of Jungle Mynas need a review study 
through a survey. 



RANGE EXTENSION OF THE RUBYTHROAT ' 
IN SOUTH INDIA. K.K. MOHAPATRA and 
PRAKASH RAO, Bird Migration Project, Bombay . 
Natural History Society, Hornbill House, Shahid Bhagat 
Singh Road, Bombay 400 023 

During the course of the BNHS Bird Migration study 
carried out in the Eastern ghat ranges of Southern Andhra 
Pradesh, three Ruby throats Erithacus calliope, a male (BNHS 
Ring A-218432 on 21.11.89) and two females (BNHS Ring 
A-237005 and A-237007 on 2.2.91) were ringed and released 
in the scrub forests around Tirumala Hills (13 14' 30" N, 79 
21'30"E). 

The male had a distinct scarlet chin and throat bordered 
by a black line on the sides of chin, while the females had 
white supercilium and a white throat with traces of pink. 
The fulvous brown breast and buffish belly readily 
differentiated them from the similar looking Himalayan 
Rubythroat Erithacus pectoralis which has a grayish breast, 4 
white belly and white tipped tail. The measurements were 
well within the known range of the bird. 

The male was ringed in early winter (Nov-1989) while 
the females towards the latter half (Feb-1991). Ali and 
Ripley (1987) restrict its range to NE Andhra Pradesh in the 
Visakhapatnam Hill ranges which are approximately 600 
km north. The present record extends the range of the bird 
suggesting that the birds may find their way to similar 
biotopes in southern India. 

Reference 

Ali S.A. and Ripley S.D. (1987): Compact Handbook of the Birds of 
India and Pakistan. Second Edition, Oxford University Press. 

NESTING OF THE WHITE EYED 
BUZZARD-EAGLE IN PUDUKUDI, THANJAVUR 

DISTRICT. P. GNANASELVAN, President, Nature 
Conservation and Education Council, Nature Home, 47- A, - 
Main Road, Pudukudi, P.O., Thanjavur District 613 402 * 

On 17th April, 1992 a friendly villager informed me 
about a Varichali (Shikra) nest with two eggs in a Tamarind 
tree. I was slightly confused at first, because I have been 
watching the local raptors and their nests in our area. A 
quick scan of my field note book revealed that, all the seven 
Shikra (Accipiter badius) nests under my observation had 
their eggs up to 28th March, and now all the seven nests are 
having half grown nestlings. 

On 18th early morning I visited the nest site and to my 
pleasant surprise I was able to identify the raptor as a White 
Eyed Buzzard-Eagle (Butastur teesa). This is my second 
personal sighting of this bird. (Last sighting in March 1990 
near Karavetti lake of Tiruchirapalli district). 



Newsletter for Birdwatchers 



17 



The eggs measured 33 x 45 mm and 34 x 45 mm. One 
egg was hatched on 20th and another on 22nd. The 
fledglings are red mixed orange coloured and not creamy 
white as Shikra and Lagger falcon. 

Regarding this White Eyed Buzzard, I would like to hear 
more from your readers about its distribution and breeding 
status in South India. 

(Editor's Note: Saw one many years ago near our house 
in Dodda-Gubbi in Bangalore and recall seeing one in 
Aurangabad thirty years ago. It seems to be getting a 'rare' 
bird). 

SIGHTING OF SKIMMER AT NAJAFGARH, 
DELHI. VIVEK MENON and TARA GANDHI 

The Indian skimmer Rhynchops albicollis Swainson was 
a common bird on the Yamuna in the early parts of the 
century. Major-General Hutson (1943-45) lists the species as 
frequenting rivers near Delhi (probably the Yamuna). Usha 
4 Ganguly (1955) notes it only once near Dasna Jheel and 
terms it resident but not too common. The Skimmer has 
since then been comparatively overlooked or has seen a 
drastic reduction in population finding no mention in bird 
counts over the last decade (Kalpavriksh 1987, Shrishti 
1990). It is thought that the peculiar feeding habit of the 
bird, which involves utilising the top few centimeters for 
fishing has made it particularly susceptible to water 
pollution. It has been proved time and again that the water 
is becoming rapidly and extensively polluted and at certain 
stretches along the Yamuna have zero oxygen levels. The 
skimmer had therefore been often quoted as being a reliable 
pollution indicator for the region. 

A pair of skimmers were seen by a bird watching group 
of Shrishti during a visit to the Najafgarh drain on the 21st. 
of July 1991. They were sitting on a sand spit surrounded 
by water and were occasionally fishing and re-alighting on 
the sand spit. The disappearances of the sand spits in many 
» wetlands, mainly owing to dredging practices could very 
well be another important reason for the disappearance of 
the species from the region. Other birds such as the 
pratincole have also shown corresponding declines in and 
around Delhi giving further credence to such a hypotheses. 

Apart from these plausible reasons for their 
disappearance, a further cause for their overlooking may 
be the sacanty data available for wetlands during the 
summers. It is believed that most wetland counts, censuses 
and birdwatching outings are conducted during winter 
months and that the habitat remains largely unvisited 
during summer. The sighting of these birds for perhaps the 
first time in a decade in the summers, is a pointer towards 
surveying our wetlands in the hotter months as well. 



References 

Ali, S., Ripley, S.D. (1983). Compact Handbook of the Birds of India 
and Pakistan, Oxford University Press, New Delhi. 

Sahadev, P., Sabharwal, V. (1987). An analysis of the Delhi Bird 
counts, Kalpavriksh 

Srishti (1990-91). Asian Midwinter Waterfowl Census data 

Ganguly, U. (1950). Birds of the Delhi area 

Hutson, H.W. (1950). The Birds about Delhi. 

SIGHTING OF THE GREAT WHITEBELLIED 
HERON IN JAMJING RESERVE FOREST, 
ASSAM, ANWARUDDIN CHOUDHURY, Addl. 
District Magistrate, Karbi Anglong, For. Corr. Near Gate 
No.l of Nehru Stadium, Islampur Road , Guwahati 
781 007, Assam 

The Great Whitebellied Heron Ardea insignis (Hume, 
1878) is a very rare bird and its sighting records are also few 
and far between. Hence, any sighting of this bird is quite 
significant. 

On 17 January, 1990 while surveying the Jamjing beel in 
the Jamjing Reserve Forest of Dhemaji district in Upper 
Assam I spotted a larger heron in a secluded area with tall 
ml (Arundo donax) grasses around. It was alert with head 
and neck fully stretched. It differed from the commoner 

grey heron 
"3? I (Ardea drier ea) 

by having 
slate-grey 
upperparts (v. 
ashy gey), 
lacking black 
crest and the 
black patch on 
shoulder 
(conspicuous 
on standing 
grey heron). It 
was very shy 
unlike the grey 
and purple 
herons (A. 
purpurea) I 

observed over 
the years. It was 
a great 

whitebellied 
heron, my first sighting of the species. Later on perhaps one 
more (may be the same one) seen. The birds took to flight 
at my sight and prolonged observation was not possible. 

Some other birds seen in the Jamjing beel included many 
purple herons (all singly), spotted billed pelicans (Pelecanus 
philippensis), Openbill stork (Anastomus oscitans), darter 
(Anhinga rufa), cattle egret (Bubulcus ibis), pond heron 
(Ardeola grayii), and lesser adjutant Leptoptilos javanicus). 
Jamjing RF (area, 91 km2) with wet savannah grassland, 
marshes and a number of beels is one of the largest 
unprotected wetlands of Assam. 




^ 



18 



Newsletter for Birdwatchers 



SIGHTING OF RUFOUSBELLIED HAWK- EAGLE 
AT KAVIKALGANDI, CHICKMAGALUR 
DISTRICT. S. KARTHIKEYAN, 24, Opp. Banashankari 
Temple, 8th Block, Jayanagar P.O., Bangalore 560 082 - 

Kavikalgandi (13 24' N, 75 44' E) is about 14 km from 
Chickmagalur, Karnataka and at a height of about 1632 m 
above MSL. The habitat of this place is typical of the 
Western Ghats with grasslands and sholas interspersed 
with coffee plantation. It is also very close to the highest 
peak in Karnataka - Mulaianagiri (1918 m above MSL). - 

During a visit to this place along with T.S. Srinivasa, 
D.V. Girish and T.V.N. Murthy, also birdwatchers on 8 
October 1991, my attention was drawn towards a raptor 
with falcon-like rapid wing beats below us as it flew over 
the valley. It gradually gained height, thus affording an 
excellent view of its upper and underparts. The rusty 
brown underparts with a contrasting white throat were 
very distinct and was immediately identified as the 
Rufousbellied Hawk Eagle Hieraatus kienerii (E. Geoffrey). 

The present sighting is the only third time the species is 
being reported from Karnataka. The two previous ones are 
that of Salim Ali (1943) during his visit to Settihalli, 
Shimoga District, between 25 January and 2 February 1940 
as part of his survey of erstwhile Mysore, the second is of 
an individual seen at Dandeli Game Sanctuary on 19 
December 1955 by Dharamkumarsinhji (1961). 

The species has been recorded from Western Ghats, 
north Karnataka through Kerala and Himalayas. In its 
southwestern range it is known to occur up to an altitude 
of 1200 m and up to 1500 m above MSL in the Himalayas 
(Ali and Ripley, 1987). The altitude at which the 
Rufousbellied Hawk Eagle was seen is about 1632 m - 
approximately 400 m more than the altitude where the 
species is known to occur in its southwestern range while 
the difference is not very significant compared to its 
Himalayan range. The present sighting though within the 
known range, is the first record for Chickmagalur district. 

References 

Ali, S. (1943). The Birds of Mysore, Part IV. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 
44(1), 9-26. 

Ali, S. and Ripley, S.D. (1987). Compact Handbook of the Birds of 
India and Pakistan, Oxford University Press, New Delhi, p.737. 

Dharamkumarsinhji, R.S. (1961). Rufousbellied Hawk Eagle, 
Lophotriorchis kienerii kienerii (E. Geoffrey) in North Kanara. J. 
Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 58(2), p. 514. 

CORRESPONDENCE 

THE BLUEHEADED ROCK THRUSH. Dr.PAMELA 
C. RASMUSSEN, (Scientific Assistant to Dr S DILLON 
RIPLEY, Smithsonian, Washington D.C. In camp 
Bombay), and, J.S. SERRAO, c/o Bombay Natural History 
Society 

Mrs Geeta Iyer and Mr Karthik Shankar's reporting of 
the Blueheaded Rock Thrush (Monticolus cinclorhynchus in 
Newsletter 32(5/6) : 15 is the second record for Andhra 



Pradesh. The credit for the first record should go to Mr * 
Trevor Price, who came across: a single bird in the last week 
of November, two each in January and February and five 
in March the following year, two males were met with in 
November and in February in the subsequent year at 
Lammasinghi in the Eastern Ghats (J.Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 
Vol.76, 417). Readers will find this information included in 
the 2nd revised edition of Vol.9 of the Handbook of Birds 
of India and Pakistan on which we are presently working. 
Incidentally, the compact edition of the Handbook 
marked as '2nd edition' contains only up to Vol.4 revised. 

AGONOSTIC BEHAVIOUR OF THE 
BLACKNECKED CRANE IN CHUSHUL, 
LADAKH, INDIA. S. ASAD AKHTAR, Scientist, Bird 
Migration Project, BNHS, Hornbill House, Bombay 
400 023 

On 22nd July 1987, at about 1600 hrs, I was watching 
through a telescope (magnification 29x), a family of the 
Blacknecked Crane Grus nigricollis, with two downy chicks, + 
about three weeks old. They were foraging in a marsh with 
a few patches of deepwater. This marsh locally known as 
'Dimik' is located approximately four km North east of 
Chushul 34 35' N; 78 43' E, elevation, 4328m), (For details 
see Blacknecked Crane in Ladakh, second Annual report 
1987). The adult cranes were foraging at some distance 
from each other, while the juveniles were resting together 
in a grassy patch, their heads barely visible above the grass. 
Few ducks were swimming around in the water patch, 
while the adult cranes foraged at the edge. Suddenly, one 
of the cranes rushed forward and grabbed a duck after 
chasing it around for sometime. It jerked the victim 
violently for a while and later released it. No attempt was 
made to smother it on the ground. This aggressive 
behaviour on the part of the cranes, was observed on two 
more occasions. On one occasion, it was Garganey teal Anas 
querquedula, while on the other it was a juvenile Brahminy 
duck Tadorna ferruginea. On both the occasions, the ducks * 
did not show any aggressive behaviour towards the cranes 
or their chicks, except that they had strayed close to the 
chicks. This probably provoked the cranes to chase and 
attack them. S.A. Hussain (pers. comm.) reported similar 
behaviour from Hanle (32 47' N; 79 04' E; elevation 4340 m) 
when the adult cranes chased the Brahminy ducks which 
strayed close to their nest. He also reported that the ravens 
Corvus corax, in Hanle would mob the cranes on the nest 
which would chase them away. The cranes might be 
attempting to swallow the duckling, as some Grus species 
are known to prey upon young birds (Irene 1981, 
Walkinshaw, 1981). Since the cranes were nesting and as 
the breeding birds requirements of protein is high (Wallace, 
1955) the cranes might be attempting to prey on the ducks. 
as a source of protein. 



Newsletter for Birdwatchers 



19 



The above mentioned aggressive behavior of the cranes, 
is probably a reflection of competition for scarce food. 
Cranes are known to be intolerant of other birds near the 
nest or near chicks (Masatomi and Kitagawa, 1974; Zongao, 
et al. 1974; Sergi 1981; Guo 1981) and their aggressive 
behaviour could also be related to the defense of nestlings. 

USE OF DROPPNGS OF INDIAN HARE FOR 
NEST MAKING BY REDWATTLED LAPWING. 

SATISH KUMAR SHARMA, Arboriculturist, World 
Forestry Arboretum, Jhalana Dungri, Jaipur 302 004 

On 1st June 1992, I located a nest of Redwattled 
Lapwing Vanellus indicus on one of the lawns of World 
Forestry Arboretum, Jaipur. After hatching of all the four 
eggs, parent deserted the nest on 9th June 1992. After 
departure of inmates from the nest, all the nest building 
materials used by the birds were collected, enumerated and 
weighed. The findings are given in Table 1. 

Table 1 
£ Nest building material collected by Redwattled Lapwing 

SI. Items nos. % Weight % 

No. Nos. (gms) Weight 



1 


Droppings of 
Indian Hare 


138 


40.35 


20.00 


17.24 


? 


Pieces of bricks 


77 


22.51 


25.00 


21.55 


3 


Pieces of stones 


107 


31.28 


7.00 


60.34 


4 


Pieces of straws 


20 


5.84 


1.00 


0.86 



It is evident from Table 1 that droppings of Indian Hare 
(Lepus nigricollis) may be used for making the nest by 
Redwattled Lapwing. Use of droppings of Indian Hare for 
making a nest by Redwattled Lapwing is not cited in 
Handbook, however it is mentioned that mud pellets, goat 
droppings, cowdung and pebbles are utilized for making 
the nest. Material like droppings of Indian Hare are easily 
available for that part of population of Redwattled 
Lapwing which lives in agricultural fields, fringes of 
forests, wastelands etc. i.e. away from human habitations. 

^Reference 

AH, S. and Riploy, S.D. (1983). Handbook of Birds of India and 
Pakistan (compact edition) 

COMMENTS ON RECENT ISSUES OF THE 
'NEWSLETTER'. V. SANTHARAM, C/o Dr P.S. Easa, 
Kerala Forest Research Institute, Peechi 680 653, Kerala 

First of all, I would like to point out a typographical 
error in the article on Vedanthangal Santuary written by 
myself and Mr Menon [NLBW XXXI (11 & 12) p.7]. In the 
'Methods and Materials' section, the last paragraph has a 
sentence which should read "The Little Cormorants, shags 
and large Little, Median, Large and Cattle Egrets were 
grouped as cormorants were counted as 'cormorants' while 
'Egrets'" and not as published. 



In this article on the spotbilled PelicanfNLBW 32 (1 &2)], 
Shri S. Sridhar refers to the Aredu-Sarapalle pelicanry of 
Andhra Pradesh. This pelicanry, discovered by Prof K.K. 
Neelakantan in the late 194Cs was found abandoned over 
two decades ago. Nelapattu, in the Nellore district, 100 km 
north of Madras is the largest pelicanry in Andhra at 
present with approximately 200 nesting pairs. 

On the observation of Shri K. Karthikeyan on a Magpie 
Robin preying on a leech [NLBW, 32 3-4): 10], I wish to point 
out that the orange-headed ground thrush (Zoothera citrina 
citrina) has been known to take leeches. On- the food of this 
species, the Handbook Vol.8, pp.88, says "...also leeches 
locally, but in spite of their great abundance these taken by 
a few individuals only...". 

In the same issue, M /s J.N. Prasad and U. Harish Kumar 
write about Jerdon's Chloropsis feeding on the flowers of 
Pithecellobium duke. I have also seen, in Peechi, in 
November 1991-January 1992, on quite a few occasions, at 
least four species of birds feeding on the flowers of Clitoria 
ternatea Linn., a common climber with blue flowers. The 
species involved were Koel, Small Green Barbet, Fairy 
Bluebird and Redvented Bulbul. Perhaps more species 
were also feeding on these flowers but I did not concentrate 
much on this behaviour as I was busy with my 
woodpeckers. 

Regarding the note on Sunbird's bath by Dr Vijay 
Tuljapurkar, I wish to draw attention to a similar 
observation on the Purplerumped Sunbird in Madras by 
me, published in the 1979 issue of 'Newsletter'. 

YELLOWTHROATED BULBUL IN THE 
ANAIMALAI HILLS. R. KANNAN, Hornbill Project, 
Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary, Top Slip 642 141 (via) 
Pollachi, T.N. 

One of the more interesting finds during the recent 
Madras Naturalists' Society expedition to the Anaimalais 
was the Yellow throated bulbul. Two birds were seen on 12 
May 1992, by a roadside waterfall on the Pollachi- Valparai 
highway, 28 km from Pollachi, just as the road begins its 
winding ascent from the Aliyar dam area. The area was 
typical yellow throated bulbul country - hillside scrub with 
stunted trees. 

The Handbook mentions of one old record from the 
Kerala side of the Anaimalais (Davison, 1886, Ibis: 146). The 
specimen could occur in the Sethumalai side of the 
foothills, i.e. the entrance to the Indira Gandhi Wildlife 
Sanctuary (Top Slip range). I plan to survey this area for the 
bird shortly. The habitat here looks ideal for the species. 

The bird, with its extremely restricted distribution in 
S.India, is causing concern amongst conservationists. Most 
of its range falls outside protected areas and its habitat is 
constantly disturbed by encroachment, grazing and 
firewood collection. It has reportedly disappeared from 
certain areas. I have spoken to the Director of the newly 
formed Salim Ali Centre (SACON) to initiate an intensive 
status survey of this species. 



20 



Newsletter for Birdwatchers 



SCIENTIFIC NOTES. T.V. JOSE, Flat No. 8, Reena 
Apartments, Chincholi Bunder Road, Malad (W), Bombay 
400 064 

The following has reference to NLBW (1&2), Jan-Feb 
1992, p.l, "Scientific Notes" featured in the Editorial. 

There is no doubt that ornithology got too scientific for 
Salim Ali and no less so to most of us readers of N.L. But 
the mention that ornithology is "infested" with graphs, etc. 
is bad in taste. 



We are interested in birds and their activities not fully * 
knowing that such interest is the basic motivation to 
understand what they are. It is this innocent interest that 
grows into insights, and scientific studies based on them 
unfold physiological and psychological aspects of a bird. 
The sense of wonder and curiosity to know more (and the 
enjoyment one gets in knowing a bird closer and closer) 
inherent in the initial interest often innate among us, must 
be allowed to grow, and N.L. has a vital role to play here. 

Please do not encourage readers of N.L. to write notes 
meant mainly for enjoyment. 



Crisis Facing the World's 

"Global water withdrawals are believed to have 
grown more than 35-fold during the past three decades, 
and are projected to increase by 30-35% by 2000. Current 
patterns of freshwater use cannot be sustained if human 
populations reach 10 billion by 2050". 

With this striking analysis "Caring for the Earth : a 
strategy for sustainable living" highlights the crisis 
facing the world's freshwater resources. Similarly, as the 
UN meets for the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro this 
month, water management is viewed by many as being 
of more immediate concern than the higher profile issues 
of climate change and sea-level rise. In simple terms, our 
planet does not have enough freshwater for human 
society to continue to use these resources as we have done 
for much of our past. We need to change the way in which 
we use and manage the world's freshwater, and to do so 
now. 

But freshwater is uneven in its distribution in both 
time and space. Years of drought are frequently followed 
by floods, while in any given year some countries suffer 
devastating drought, while only a few hundred 
kilometres away others have abundant supplies of 
freshwater. For much of the past, governments have 
responded to this variability in the availability of 
freshwater by seeking to control the rivers and their water, 
storing it in dams for redistribution during the dry season 
and in times of drought, and building canals and dykes 
designed to prevent flooding during the rains and in 
exceptionally wet years. 

Most readers will be familiar with the environmental 
effects of many of these water projects, and with the 
long-running opposition of many conservation bodies to 
such structural approaches to managing the world's 
water resources. Today however these voices have been 
joined by an increasingly vocal constituency of 
development professionals who argue that not only do 
many of these projects fail to generate the benefits 
intended, but that the majority of those that do, benefit 
only the urban and industrial sector, while leading to a 
further decline in the well-being of the rural poor. In their 
place, a fully integrated approach to the management of 
water resources and the natural ecosystems which 



Freshwater Resources 

support them is being called for, one which looks at the 
needs of all water users. 

This holistic approach to water management was one 
of the central themes of the UN Conference on Water and 
the Environment which was held in Dublin, Ireland from 
26-31 January 1992. Drawing attention to the severity of 
the water crisis, the Dublin Statement highlights the 
importance of water in sustaining natural ecosystems and 
calls for integrated management of river basins in order 
to safeguard aquatic ecosystems. In doing so the 
Conference has thrown down a challenge to the 
conservation movement. Now, instead of simply calling 
for an alternative approach to water management, we 
need to provide detailed technical guidance showing 
how natural aquatic ecosystems can be managed for 
long-term benefits. In short, we need to move beyond the 
rhetoric of conservation theory and demonstrate that it 
works. 

Following only ten days after the Dublin Conference, 
the World Parks Congress in Caracas, Venezuela from 
10-21 February, took an important step in this direction 
by holding as one of the conference workshops, a debate 
on Protected Areas and the Hydrological Cycle. By 
bringing together examples of how protected areas can 
both protect freshwater resources and provide a frame 
work for sustainable use of ecosystems dependent upon 
a regular flow of freshwater, this workshop took an 
important step towards strengthening efforts by the 
conservation community to respond to the Dublin 
challenge. This however is but a tiny step in the right 
direction, and the coming years will need to see a 
substantial increase in the attention given by the 
conservation community to demonstrating that the 
maintenance of natural hydrological regimes can indeed 
yield substantially greater benefits for human society 
than continued large-scale investment in altering 
riverflow. Integrated wetland management is central to 
this response and the wetland conservation community 
will need to play a central role in addressing this 
challenge. 

by Patrick Dugan, Wetlands Programme Coordinator, IUCN 
Courtesy : IUCN Wetlands Programme Newsletter, June 1992 



Newsletter for Birdwatchers 



22 



* 



Threatened Waterfowl Species Working Group 

Recommendations for Action on Threatened Waterfowl 
Species in South and West Asia 

Threatened Anatidae 

1. Implementation of the international action plan 
recently prepared for the White- winged Wood Duck 
is urgently required. This includes a thorough 
survey of the protected areas of Assam and 
Arunachal Pradesh for the White-winged Wood 
Duck, to establish the distribution of the species and 
whether or not it is adequately protected. An 
immediate survey is also required of the Chittagong 
Hill Tracts in Bangladesh where the species is 
present but under extreme threat from hunting and 
habitat destruction. 

2. Adequate protection should be given to the 
White-headed Duck population wintering in Punjab 
Province, Pakistan, and its habitat. Ucchali, Jahlar, 
Khabbckki, Nammal and Kalar Kahar lakes should 
all be strictly protected. 

3. The Right Bank Outfall Drain Project as currently 
designed will change the ecology of Hamal Katchri 
and other wetlands in Sindh of great importance to 
the Marbled Teal. The Project should therefore be 
reviewed and alternative solutions found. 

Regular surveys should be conducted of all Sindh 
wetlands to clarify the distribution, movements and 
breeding sites of this population of Marbled Teal to assess 
the impacts of the RBOD Project. 

Other Threatened Waterbirds 

1. Owing to their great importance for threatened 
species such as Spoon-billed Sandpiper and Indian 
Skimmer, the following wetlands in Bangladesh 
should be granted immediate protection : Nijhum 
Dweep, Ghasiar Char, Sonar Char, east Dhal Char, 
Char Dhigal, Urir Char and key wetlands in the Haor 
Basin (particularly Pingla and Chatla beels at 
Hakaluki Haor and part of Hail Haor). 

2. Research into the distribution, breeding biology and 
causes of decline of the Black-bellied Tern is required 
in eastern Pakistan, India and Nepal. Important 
breeding areas should be protected. 

3. Research is needed into the breeding success of 
Greater Adjutants, especially concerning the 
possible effects of human fishing in reducing the 
food supply during the period of chick 
development. Studies should also be carried out on 
possible competitive exclusion of Greater Adjutants 
by Lesser Adjutants. 



4. Greater Adjutants and Bar-headed Geese should be 
included in Schedule I of the Protection Act in India. 

5. Black-bellied Tem, Indian Skimmer and Oriental 
Darter should be assigned to the "Indeterminate" 
category in the IUCN Red List of Threatened 
Animals. 

6. Loss of nesting trees at the major Kokkare Bellur 
Pclicanry in Karnataka has contributed to the decline 
of the Spot-billed Pelican in India. Provision of 
artificial nest platforms should be attempted on an 
experimental basis. 

7. Attempts should be made to improve the design of 
artificial nest baskets provided for Oriental Darters 
at Tekkadi Reservoir, Kerala, and to monitor their 
effectiveness. 

8. Surveys should be undertaken to establish the status 
of the Andaman Teal and Andaman Rail. 

9. Education programmes are required to raise 
awareness of threatened species in areas where they 
concentrate and so may seem common and therefore 
under no threat. 

10. Ecological research (followed by conservation 
action) on all of the following scarce and threatened 
waterfowl of South and West Asia should be of high 
priority in research programmes undertaken by 
research institutes (universities etc.) in the region : 

Spot-billed Pelican 
Dalmatian Pelican 
Pygmy Cormorant 
African Darter* 



Oriental Darter 
White-bellied Heron 
Lesser Adjutant 
Greater Adjutant 
Black-necked Stork* 
Lesser White-fronted Goose 
Bar-headed Goose 
Red- breasted Goose 



White-winged 

Wood-Duck 
Marbled Teal 
Baer's Pochard 
Ferruginous Duck 
White-headed Duck 
Black-headed Duck 
Siberian Crane 
Watercock* 
Masked Finfoot 
Sociable Plover 
Slender-billed Curlew 



Cover Indian Pitta (Pitta brachyura). Always alert and curious, this 
bright coloured bird of the "Jewel-Thrush" family, moves swiftly over 
the tangled roots of the forest floor in long and easy hops. This uncanny 
ventriloquist gives out a loud melodious double whistle "wieet-piyou" , 
that makes it difficult to locate. Being shy by nature, it takes off at once 
with a swift direct flight, through the forest canopy. 

Photo: S. Sridhar, arps 

Editor ZAFAR FUTEHALLY, Moitaka, BearShola Road, 

Kodaikanal624101. 

Printed and Published by S. Sridhar at Navbharath Enterprises, 

Seshadripuram, Bangalore 560 020, for Private Circulation only. 



Red Data Bird 



Lesser Kestrel 

by Jean-Pierre Biber 



The Lesser Kestrel Falco naumanni is 
a bird of open areas, avoiding closed 
forest, wetlands, and farmland with tall 
crops. In the Western Palearctic, it is 
found in continental and forest steppes 
and semi-desertic land, foraging in 
meadows, pastures, steppe-like habi- 
tat, non-intensively cultivated land and 
occasionally in scrub (garrigue) and 
open woodland. Itpreferswarmorhot 
areas with short vegetation and patches 
of bare ground, where it can easily find 
its prey. 

In its North African breeding areas 
and its winter quarters, it forages in 
savanna, steppe, thornbush vegetation, 
and on open grassland or farmland. 
The main food consists of invertebrates, 
chiefly larger Orthoptera. Inwinterthe 
Lesser Kestrel relies largely on swarms 
of locusts. 

(Painting: N. Arlott) 





Most Lesser Kestrels winter in Africa. 
Information on wintering numbers in 
West Africa is limited, but it is likely that 
this region holds relatively low num- 
bers. The main wintering areas lie in 
eastern Africa, from Kenya south to 
Botswana, and especially South Africa. 

The Lesser Kestrel has a Palearctic 
breeding distribution, south of 55°N 
latitude. Relatively i ittle is known about 
the exact breeding range of the species 
in Asia. In Europe Snd northern Africa, 
the Lesser Kestrel has a mainly Mediter- 
ranean distribution, but it is also known 
to breed in large oarts of the former 
USSR. 

The Lesser Kestrel normally breeds in 
monospecificcoloniesofl 20-250 pairs. 
With the decline of the species, small 
colonies of less than 1 pairs and single 
pairs have become more and more 
common. They ne;t in holes in walls of 
old houses, stables, barns, castles or 
churches or under their roofs, usually 
under the tiles of the lower edge of the 
roof. They also breed in tree holes, in 
earth cliffs, and sometimes in rocks, 
quarries or heaps of stones. In Europe, 
they used to be common in many 
towns and villages of the Mediterra- 
nean Basin. 

The Lesser Kestrel has shown major 
population declines in large parts of its 
western Palearctic breeding range and 
has disappeared from many countries 
where it bred until recently. The main 
reason for this decline is thought to be 
the loss of hunting habitat due to ur- 
banisation, agricultural intensification 
and the abandonment of traditional 



Lesser Kestrel (Photo: A. Robles/SEO) 

pastoral activities. The large scale appli- 
cation of pesticides in modern agricul- 
ture reduces food availability and seems 
to be partly to blame for the decline of 
the species. This holds both for the 
West Palearctic breeding area and the 
African winter quarters. Many nest sites 
in older building have been eliminated 
during renovation, or such buildings 
have been removed and replaced with 
modern ones no longer providing nest- 
ing niches. This seems to affect the 
species in many regions where it used 
to be commonly linked to human set- 
tlements. Competition for nest sites 
with other bird species, mainly the 
Jackdaw, and kleptoparasitism by the 
same species, may have a serious im- 
pact in mixed colonies. Pesticides are 
also known to have reduced breeding 
success in some areas, but it is not clear 
whether this is due to intake in breeding 
areas or in the winter quarters. Human 
persecution and disturbance may lo- 
cally affect breeding birds. 

In planning action for the protection 
of the Lesser Kestrel, the conservation 
of suitable foraging habitat around ex- S 
isting breeding colonies should receive ~ 
highest priority. To this end, careful § 
land-use planning to avoid develop- 1 
ment of such areas is essential. The use H 
of pesticides should be regulated and $ 
alternative pest control techniques g 
should be applied. It is worth noting 2 
that conservation measures for the ^ 
Lesser Kestrel are likely to have positive - 
effects for other threatened grassland $ 
bird species (such as White Stork Ciconia g 
ciconia and Great Bustard Otis tarda). <->