Skip to main content

Full text of "NLBW38_6"

See other formats


Newsletter for 
Birdwatchers 



Vol.38 No. 6 Nov. /Dec. 199B 



^M'hg 



••••a. - ,r 



*> 




E fife 






Vol.38 No. 6 Nov. /Dec. 1998 



Editorial 




Editorial 

□ Kihim Diary 



D Naturalist, by Edward O. Wilson . ~-*s 



Articles 

D Birds of Pakhui Wildlife Sanctuary in Western 
Arunachal Pradesh, by Aparajita Datta, Pratap Singh, 
Ramana M. Athreya and S, Karthikeyan 

d Glimpses of Kenyan Bird Life, by S. Ashok Kumar, 
IAS (Retd.) 

d At Home with the Spotted Munias, by Thomas F. 
Martin 

D Rare Species of Bird atThiruvananthapuram, by K.B. 
Sanjayan 

a Unexplored Wetland of Uttar Pradesh, by Mohd. 
Zafar-ul Islam 

Abstracts 

□ Birding in the Andamans, by Prof. A. Relton 

D Nest-making and breeding of the Purplerumped 
Sunbirds, by Dr. Satish A. Pande 

d Unusual Tail Pattern of Bronzed Drongo, by R. 
Shyama Prasad Rao 

Correspondence 

D Grey Babbler attacking its reflection, by J.L. Singh 

d Koel boom at Jodhpur, by Dr. Ishwar Prakash 

d Black Bulbuls and Melia azedarach, by M.L. Narang 
& R.S. Rana 

D Save the Heronry at Mathikere, by Dr. J.C. Uttangi 

d Spotbill Pelican in Jakkur Lake, by George Verghese 

D Large clutch size in Grey Francolins, by J.K. Tiwari 

□ Darters & Little Egrets Nesting in Gudavi Bird 
Sanctuary, by Gurunath Desai 

□ Asian Anatidae Atlas, by Asad R. Rahmani 

d Costly Geese : $ 5.3 million at J.F. Kennedy Airport. 
Courtesy, International Herald Tribune of 1 1 .1 1 .98 

D 23rd International Ornithological Congress to be held 
in China 11 -17th August 2002 

Book Review 

□ Communities & Conservation, by Zafar Futehally 

^ — x 

Wishing all our readers a very happy 

and successful New Year - 1 999 



Kihim Diary 

This year the rains have broken all records and the 
unseasonal downpour in Bombay continued until Nc.e~:r- 
80% of the paddy crop is ruined and the story of rotting onic-« 
with prices rising up to Rs. 60/- a kg is well known. The village 
tank in Kihim is full to the brim but with all the vegetate - 
cleared the birds were few and far between. Pond herons 
cattle egrets, red wattled lapwings, a cormorant and the 
unfailing white breasted kingfisher were the lot when as 
arrived on 28th October. But for the rest of the time we were 
there (till 23rd November) there was often a couple of 
gull-billed terns circling the tank, diving (after their miraculous 
reverse twist) to pick up prey from the surface of the water. 

There is no progress about our proposal to make the tank 
into a bird sanctuary. But one day a couple from Nagpur turned 
up to look at the house where Salim Ali stayed. They were 
apparently planning a seminar on birdwatching somewhere 
nearKarad, on 12th November, (S.A.'s birthday). They offered 
to pass a resolution on the Kihim tank sanctuary and to send 
it to the Chief Minister of Maharashtra and to the Collector of 
Raigad District. That is the sort of support we need and I 
request readers of the Newsletter around Mumbai to do the 
same. The beach was full of plovers (lesser, kentish, ringed) 
and sandpipers (Terek's too with their red legs & upturned 
beaks), oyster catchers, turnstone, whimbrel, red shanks and 
others. The plovers were unusually aggressive and I saw 
collisions in mid air on a few occasions. Obviously they had 
just arrived from their breeding grounds in the north and were 
still territorially inclined. On 1 5th November during high tide at 
9 a.m. the beach was fuller than usual with birds and a pair of 
Caspian terns with their lovely red bills were circling around 
gull-billed terns. There was a solitary reef heron in its dark 
uniform. As it flew the two white spots at the edge of the 
primaries looked very decorative. Why has this colour pattern 
not been mentioned in the books? It is such an arresting sign 
like the two white spots on the tiger's ears. 

At the extreme north of Kihim beach which is separated 
from the Awas region by the creek, there is a very productive 
scrub jungle with plenty of lantana where bulbuls flourish. A 
flock of grey headed mynas, were enjoying the berries of the 
lantana. I see that the alternate common name (A.C.N.) 
suggested for the species is chestnut tailed myna. I hope the 
original name will survive. 

Not far from here on two occasions, I saw a lovely solitary 
specimen of a minivet on a telegraph wire, but its colours, pink 
throat, yellow breast, dark grey body do not match with the 
illustrations in the books. Common grey hornbills, small green 
bee eaters, redwhiskered and red-vented bulbuls, spotted 
doves, and jungle babblers were the commonest birds in our 



Newsletter for Birdwatchers 



91 



garden. The calls of coucals were aplenty. I keep wondering 
at the meaning of their numbered calls 4 to 6 and more in 
regular patterns. Paradise flycatchers were often seen and a 
birder reported a large goup of bluetailed bee eaters Merops 
philippinus in a casuarina grove by the beach. I recall seeing 
a large flock 30 years ago in the same place, and their calls 
te-tew te-tew by which I identified them, are fresh in my 
memory. 

On 12th November on the road to Kankeshwar I found a 
few turtle doves in the same spot where I saw them in May 
(reported in the Newsletter of May/June 98). 

Just as I was wondering about the absence of wagtails I 
saw a couple of white wagtails Motacilla alba on the beach. 
From their black and white facial markings I could not tell 
whether they were personata or dukhunensis. 

But the sight that thrilled me the most was of a 
blackcapped kingfisher on the rocks on the beach just 
opposite our house where it has often been seen in the past. 
At 9 a.m. on 13th November, the light was perfect and the 
bird's velvet black cap, broad white collar on the hind neck, 
blood red bill, pink legs and rusty brown underneath showed 
up to perfection. For a moment it flew on to the ground and 
came back to the same spot on the rock with a beakful. The 
morsel protruded beyond the mandibles and it took over 5 
minutes to crush it to a swallowable size. This bird is certainly 
a candidate for a beauty competition among avians. 

Naturalists by Edward O. Wilson 

Every one who has read this book will agree that is is "one 
of the finest scientific memoirs ever written". As one reviewer 
says, "no one has been able to connect a "humble detail" so 
effectively to a "grand vision". So whether it is the life of ants, 
the subject of Wilson's book, or birds, it is the humble detail 
which must not be ignored. Every page of this book has a 
fascinating ecological insight but one which particularly 
pleased me was the author's comment on the concept of 
sub-species. In our Newsletter I have often omitted the 



trinomial sub-species mainly because sub-species are 
unidentifiable in the field, and one is likely to make a mistake. 
But there are other reasons why the concept of sub-species 
is a questionable one. Listen to Wilson, page 207. 

"It was a subject deserving close inspection. Everywhere 
taxonomists were treating the sub-species as an objective 
category and one of the key steps of evolution. Consider their 
logic : species are divided into subspecies, which we must 
assume to be real and objective because given enough time 
they evolve into species, which are real and objective. 
Subspecies were (and still are) given formal latinized names 
by taxonomists. The bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus for 
example, is a species divided by taxonomists into two such 
races, the southern bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus 
leucocephalus and the northern bald eagle Haliaeetus 
leucocephalus washingtoniensis. 

"For reasons not immediately clear to Brown and me, 
subspecies seemed insubstantial and arbitrary. We set out to 
conduct a critical review of the premises behind their 
recognition, by looking at real cases. The foundaitons proved 
even weaker than we had imagined. We discovered that the 
geographic limits of subspecies are often hard or impossible 
to draw, because the traits used to define them vary in a 
discordant pattern. The nature of the discordance can be most 
immediately understood with an imaginary but typical 
example: colour in a butterfly spcies varies east to west, size 
decreased from north to south, and an extra band appears on 
the hind wing in a few localities near the centre. And so on for 
any number of traits the taxonomist might choose from an 
almost endless list available for classification. It follows that 
the identity of the subspecies into which the butterfly species 
is divided depends on the traits chosen to define them. Pick 
colour, and you have two east-west races. Pick colour plus 
size, and four races in a quadrant come into existence. Add 
the hind-wing band, and the number of races can double 
again. Hence the subspecies are arbitrary." 

In short, there is a great deal of subjective element in 
deciding about the subspecies, and this is something we have 
to bear in mind. 



Birds of Pakhui Wildlife Sanctuary in Western 
Arunachal Pradesh, North East India 

'APARAJITA DATTA, * PRATAP SINGH, ++ RAMANA M. ATHREYA and "S. KARTHIKEYAN, 
* Wildlife Institute of India, Post Bag #18, Dehradun248 001, U.P., India, 
++ Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris, 98 bis, Boulevard Arago, 75014, Paris, 
"Asst. Education Officer, WWF - Karnataka State Office, Bangalore 

During the course of a 6 month study (November 1995 to 
April 1 996) on the response of arboreal mammals to selective 




logging in Pakhui Wildlife Sanctuary and adjacent reserve 
forests in Western Arunachal Pradesh, about 1 50 bird species 
sighted were recorded by the first author. 



A total of 256 bird species has now been recorded from 
the area, the bulk of which were sighted by the second author. 
Pakhui WLS (92 ° 7.5'E to 92 ° 22' E and 26 °53.7' N to 27 
°16.2' N) covers an area of 862 km 2 and is bounded to the 
north and west by the river Bhareli, to the east by the Pakke 



92 



Newsletter for Birdwatchers 



river and to the south by the Nameri WLS and reserve forests 
of Assam. 

The sanctuary is criss-crossed by a number of small rivers 
and perennial streams of the Bhareli and Pakke rivers, both 
of which join the Brahmaputra river. The area lies in the 
foothills of the Himalaya and the terrain is undulating and hilly. 
The altitude ranges from 200 m to above 1500 m above sea 
level. The area has a subtropical climate with cold weather 
from November to February. Both the south-west and 
north-east monsoon are prevalent here. The average annual 
rainfall is 2500 mm. 

The general vegetation type is tropical semi-evergreen 
(Champion & Seth, 1 968). The vegetation is dense with a high 
diversity and density of woody lianas and climbers. A total of 
234 plant species (angiosperms) was recorded here with a 
high representation of species from the Euphorbia^eae and 
Lauraceae families (Datta & Goyal, in prep). The major 
emergent species are Tetrameles nudiflora and Altingia 
excelsa (Singh, 1991). The forest types include tropical 
semi-evergreen forests along the lower plains and foothills 
dominated by Terminalia myriocarpa, Ailanthus grandis and 
Duabanga grandiflora (Singh, 1991). There are certain 
patches of tropical evergreen forests dominated by Altingia 
excelsa, Mesua ferrea, Dysoxylum species, and middle storey 
trees belonging to Lauraceae and Myrtaceae. The hill tops are 
dominated by subtropical broadleaved forests of the 
Fagaceae. Moist areas near streams have a profuse growth 
of bamboo, canes and a palm species, Livistonia jenkinsii, 
locally known as Tokko, which is extensively used as thatch. 
Along the larger perennial streams, there are shingle beds 
with patches of tall grassland, which give way to lowland moist 
forests with Dillenia indica and Talauma hodgsonii. Human 
settlements along with some cultivation existed in a small area 
in the southern part of the sanctuary in Khari area in the past 
as evinced by abandoned clearings and gaps with thick weedy 
undergrowth. Cane extraction on a commercial basis occurred 
here till 1 991 . Occasionally cane-cutters enter the forets here 
fr.om the adjacent reserve forests of Assam. Villagers also 
come into the sanctuary to fish and to collect honey, agar from 
Aquilaria agallocha and dhuna from Canarium species. A 
small part of the forest near the southern boundary had also 
undergone some felling in the past before the area was 
declared a sanctuary in 1 978. This area had several colonizing 
species such as Bauhinia purpurea and Mallotussp. common 
in secondary forests. 

A vast portion in the central and northern part of the 
sanctuary is quite inaccessible due to the dense vegetation, 
hilly terrain and the lack of trails. Consequently, very few 
people, even local tribals, venture into the interior of the forest. 
The sole village, Mabusa, to the south of the sanctuary has 
been relocated. One or two settlements are present near the 
northern boundary. The Bhareli river acts as a barrier to the 
pressures of human distrubance, though occasionally local 
tribals may cross over. Therefore, most of Pakhui WLS, except 
a small strip to the south, has undisturbed primary forest. 



Phenological data on trees in 210.25 ha plots is being 
gathered to document the fruiting patterns in these forests. 
Certain hypotheses regarding the factors underlying fruiting 
patterns would also be tested. Besides information on hornbill 
diet, breeding biology, roosting and nesting habitat and their 
effectiveness as seed dispersers, data on frugivore 
assemblages at fruting trees and overlap in food species 
among frugivorous birds is being collected during 
observations at fruiting trees (mainly figs) and adlibitum 
sighting records of bird species on fruit trees. At fruiting figs 
visited by hornbills, the other frugivorous birds are mainly the 
pintailed green pigeon (flocks over 100 at any one time), the 
lineated barbet, blue- throated barbet, the hill myna and the 
fairy bluebird. 

Notes on some birds of the area (by Aparajita Datta) 

Of the waterbirds, the black stork is usually sighted along 
the perennial streams in Khari area. This year, I saw a flock 
of more than 20 on Khari nala, though usually solitary birds or 
pairs are more commonly seen. I also saw juvenile storks on 
a number of occasions. Common mergansers are usually 
seen in winter (from November to February) both on the Pakke 
and Bhareli river. In the winter of 1 995-96, bigger flocks were 
seen throughout the day in Pakke river. In the last two years, 
fewer birds were seen. In the early morning, a few hunters 
often take potshots at these birds. In February 1997, I saw a 
tribal hunter trying to retrieve a merganser he had shot in the 
fast-flowing water. Gunshots are commonly heard from the 
river in the morning. 

I have sighted the ibisbill only on Khari nala, though RA 
& SK have sighted these birds even on the Bhareli river in Tipi. 
Once I recovered an injured bird from the nala which had 
probably been pecked at by some raptor. Again, this year, I 
did not see any ibisbills on the nala. 

The Elwe's crake was sighted around a still natural pool 
in the middle of dense evergreen forest (probably one of the 
finest patches of undisturbed primary forest in Pakhui). This 
pool is called Pukhri and is situated on top of a plateau. It is 
about 10 km from Khari and one has to cross the various 
meandering streams of the Khari nala more than 20 times on 
the way to this area. This pool is stagnant, and is probably 
formed by rain water collecting in a natural depression. There 
is overhanging vegetation, floating logs and the area seems 
like an ideal habitat for the white-winged wood duck. In fact, 
the white-winged wood duck occurs in the adjacent Nameri 
National Park in Assam, so it is likely that this duck occurs 
here too. Pratap Singh and I saw the rare green cochoa on a 
walk through this dense forest. It was the first and only sighting 
of the species here. 

There are a total of 9 species of pigeons and doves 
occurring here. Of this, I have sighted flocks of the 
grey-fronted green pigeon feeding on fruits of a Garruga 
species, while large flocks of pin-tailed green pigeons were 
the only pigeons sighted feeding on fruiting figs such as Ficus 
nervosa, Ficus elastica and Ficus hookeriana. I have several 
observations of the bar-tailed cuckoo dove feeding on the very 
small black juicy fruits of several medium-sized trees such as 



Newsletter for Birdwatchers 



93 



Callicarpa. sp. and Ostodes paniculata (locally called 
Khujli-pat). Barbets and maroon oriole on the other hand were 
very commonly seen feeding on fruits of Hovenia acerba 
which are also eaten by locals here. The small rounded black 
ripe fruits of Vitex pentaphylla formed a very important food 
source for the smaller frugivorous birds from December to 
February. The fruits of the palm species, Livistonia jenkinsii 
are also an important food source for frugivorous birds and 
mammals from October to January. There was a total failure 
in fruiting of this species in the winter of 1 995-96, but this year, 
most individuals had large fruit crops. Flocks of hill mynahs, 
pigeons, fairy bluebirds were common on fruiting individuals 
of this species. They also form an important food source for 
hornbills in this period, since most of their food species ripen 
later during the breeding season. There is a dearth of fleshy 
ripe berries of lipid-rich capsular fruits during the period. 
Hornbills share their fig fruit resource mainly with barbets, hill 
mynahs and green pigeons. Among non-fig fruits, only species 
bearing medium-sized fleshy berries seem to be shared by 
barbets and hill mynahs. Over 20 food species for hornbills 
have been identified during this study. A captive wreathed 
hornbill was fed fruits of these species to determine gut 
passage rates. 

An amazing 13 species of woodpeckers are recorded 
here. The goldenbacked, yellownaped and rufous 
woodpeckers are very common. The great slaty woodpecker 
uses treeholes on trees of Tetrameles nudiflora for nesting. 
So do redbreasted parakeets, hill mynas and of course the 
hornbills. Nests of magpie-robin and the shama were also 
observed in tree hollows or holes. 

Bulbuls are represented by 8 species here, of which the 
most common species is the white-throated bulbul, flocks of 
which are very conspicuous due to their noisy calls. I observed 
a nest of the blacknecked yellow bulbul in April 1 997. The nest 
was a cup-shaped structure knit together with small thin twigs, 
bark shreds and dry leaves and spider webs on a shrub about 
2 m from the ground. The nest was right on the edge of a forest 
path used by Forest Department staff under a tall Tetrameles 
tree in which there was a wreathed hornbill nest which I used 
to observe regularly. The bulbul nest had two newly-hatched 
chicks on 8th April and there was usually one parent in 
attendance throughout, but since there was regular movement 
of people, the agitated parent would fly away nearby and 
return again when the coast was clear. A few days later while 
I was watching the hornbill nest, there was a commotion near 
the bulbul nest and I suddenly saw two crows flying low and 
a flurry of feathers in the air. They had killed one parent. I 
would visit the nest, in the next two-three days to feed the two 
chicks with little insects and rice grains. They were still altricial, 
and one chick was more active and stronger, so all the food I 
gave was taken by only this chick. I saw no sign of the other 
parent for at least a week, then one day to my surprise, I saw 
a bulbul sitting on the nest. Maybe the other parent had been 
in attendance throughout. By this time, the wing feathers of 
both chicks had developed and a few days later when I 
inspected the nest, I found an empty nest. But I wonder if they 



were big enough to have flown or were killed by predators, 
though the nest was still intact and there were no other signs 
of predation. 

I have also seen the nests of the largely solitary 
blue-bearded bee-eater which is more of a forest bird than the 
other two bee- eaters recorded here, viz. the chestnut-headed 
and bluetailed bee-eater which are in larger flocks near open 
grassy areas near rivers, cliff sides and streams. The nests of 
the bluebearded bee-eater was on the soft clayey soil banks 
along sides of trails in the forest. They excavated tunnel-like 
holes in the soil. 

Two birds recorded in the list here were sighted at much 
lower altitudes than reported by Ali (1983). These were the 
scarlet finch, a flock of which I actually saw just outside Pakhui 
in the Doimara R.F. at about 900 m elevation. Another species 
is the grey-headed parrotbill, which I saw again in Doimara 
R.F. nearTipi. 

Several roost sites of hornbills were identified. Roost trees 
were generally tall thinly-foliaged deciduous trees near the 
river banks, cliff edges of perennial streams. The main roost 
tree species were Bombax ceiba, Tetrameles nudilfora, and 
Albzzia sp. At some roosts only small flocks of a single species 
such as either the great or wreathed hornbill were seen. But 
sometimes roosts were of both species together in the same 
location along the cliff edges at these roost sites. This year in 
January, over 150 wreathed hornbills and about 100 great 
hornbills roosted at the same location every evening. Flocks 
of the smaller Indian pied hornbill also roosted some distance 
away from the other two species near the river. 

Relative abundances (encounter rates) of both pheasants 
and hornbills were recorded along trails during the logging 
study in 1995-96. Pheasant abundance was found to be 
lowest in logged forest and plantation (Doimara and Papum 
R.F.) and highest in unlogged forest (Datta, in prep.). While 
wreathed hornbill abundance did not differ between habitats, 
the great hornbill was more abundant in unlogged forest and 
the Indian pied hornbill occurred only near river margin 
secondary forests (Datta, in review). 

References 

Ali, S. (1993). A Pictorial Guide to the Birds of the Indian 
subcontinent. Bombay Natural History Society - Oxford 
University Press. 

Ali, S. and Ripley, S.D. (1 983). Handbook of the Birds of India and 
Pakistan. Compact edition, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, New 
York, Delhi. 

Athreya, R. and Karthikeyan, S. (unpubl. manuscript). A report on 
a visit to the Wildlife Sanctuaries of the Dafla hills of Arunachal 
Pradesh. 

Champion, H.G. and Seth, S.K. (1968). A revised survey of the 
forest types of India. Manager, Publications Division. Govt, of 
India, New Delhi. 



94 



Newsletter for Birdwatchers 



Datta, A. (in review). Preliminary observations on hornbill 
abundance in untagged forests, selectively logged forests and 
a plantation in western Arunachal Pradesh, north-east India. 
Oryx. 

Datta, A. (in prep.) Pheasant abundance in selectively logged and 
untagged forests in western Arunachal Pradesh, north-east 
India. 

Datta, A. and Goyal, S.P. {in prep.) Responses of arboreal 
mammals to selective logging in western Arunachal Pradesh. 
Report to be submitted to Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun. 

Singh, P. (1991). Avian and mammalian evidences in Pakhui 
Wildlife Sanctuary in East Kameng district, Arunachal 
Pradesh. Arunachal Forest News 9(2), 1-10. 

Singh, P. (1994). Recent bird records from Arunachal Pradesh. 
Forktail 10, 65-104. 

Checklist of birds of Pakhui Wildlife Sanctuary 
(East Kameng district, Western Arunachal Pradesh) 

The initials after each species refer to species sighted 
only by one of the authors. 

Family : Phalacrocoracidae 

I) Large cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo, 2) Little cormorant 
Phalacrocorax niger AD; 3) Indian darter Anhinga rufa RA & SK 

Family : Ardeidae 

4) Indian pond heron Ardeola grayir, 5) Little green heron Ardeoia 
striatum, 6) Little egret Egretta garzetta; 7) Cattle egret Bubulcus ibis 
PS 

Family : Ciconidae 

8) Black stork Ciconia nigra 
Family : Threskiornithidae 

9) White ibis Threskiornis aethiopica PS 
Family : Anatidae 

10) Common merganser Mergus merganser 

Family : Accipitridae 

II) Brahminy kite Haliastur indus AD; 12) Crested hawk-eagle 
Spizaetus cirrhatus cirrhatus; 13) Crested serpent eagle Spilomis 
cheela; 14) White-backed vulture Gyps benghalensis; 15) Blyth's 
baza Aviceda jerdoni; 16) Paraiah kite Milvus migrans govinda RA & 
SK; 17) Hen harrier Circus cyaneus RA & SK; 18) Short-toed eagle 
Circaetus gallicus RA & SK; 1 9) Honey buzzard Pemis ptilorhyncus 
PS; 20) Hodgson's hawk-eagle Spizaetus nipalensis PS; 21) Pied 
harrier Circus melanoleucos PS; 22) Osprey Pandion haliaetus PS; 
23) Sparrowhawk Accipter nisus PS; 24) Shikra Accipiter badius PS 

Family Falconidae 

25) Whitelegged falconet Microhierax melanoleucos; 26) Kestrel 
Falco tinnunculus PS 

Family Phasianidae 

27) White-cheeked hill partridge Arborophila atrogularis PS; 28) 
Kaleej pheasant Lophura leucomelana lathamr, 29) Red jungle fowl 
Gallus gallus, 30) Peacock pheasant Polyplectron bicalcaratum 




Family : Rallidae 

31) Elwe's crake Amauromis bicolor; 32) Whitebreasted waterhen 
Amaurornis phoenicurus AD 

Family : Ibidorhychidae 

33) Ibisbill Ibidorhyncha struthersii 
Family : Burhinidae 

34) Stone curlew Burhinus oedicnemus AD 
Family : Glareolidae 

35) Small Indian pratincole Glareola lactea 
Family : Charadriidae 

36) Redwattled lapwing Vanellus indicus; 37) Spurwinged lapwing 
Vanellus spinosus; 38) Green sandpiper Tringa ochropus; 39) 
Common greenshank Tringa nebularia; 40) Blacktailed godwit Limosa 
limosa PS; 41) Common sandpiper Tringa hypoleucos; 42) Little 
ringed plover Charadrius dubius 

Family : Laridae 

43) Indian river tern Sterna aurantia 
Family : Columbidae 

44) Pintailed green pigeon Treron apicauda; 45) Pompadour or 
greyfronted green pigeon Treron pompadora; 46) Thick- billed green 
pigeon Treron curvirostra; 47) Green imperial pigeon Ducula aenea; 
48) Mountain imperial pigeon Ducula badia; 49) Bartailed cuckoo 
dove Macropygia unchat, 50) Rufous turtle dove Streptopelia 
orientalis, 51) Spotted dove Streptopelia chinensis; 52) Emerald dove 
Chalcophaps indica 

Family : Psittacidae 

• 

53) Redbreasted parakeet Psittacula alexandrr, 54) Indian lorikeet 
Lohculus vemalis, 55) Alexandrine parakeet Psittacula eupatria RA 
&SK 

Family : Cuculidae 

56) Rufousbellied plaintive cuckoo Cacomantis merulinus; 57) Large 
greenbilled malkoha Rhopodytes tristis; 58) Lesser coucal Centropus 
toulou; 59) Drongo-cuckoo Surniculus lugubris; 60) Indian cuckoo 
Cuculus micropterus PS 

Family : Strigidae 

61) Barred owlet Glaucidium cuculoides; 62) Spotted owlet Athene 
brama PS; 63) Scops owl Otus scops PS; 64) Collared scops owl Otus 
bakkamoena PS; 65) Brown hawk owl Ninox scutulata PS; 66) Forest 
eagle-owl Bubo nipalensis AD 

Family : Caprimulgidae 

67) Longtailed nightjar Caprimulgus macrurus 
Family : Apodidae 

68) House swift Apus affinis AD; 69) Palm swift Cypsiurus parvus, 70) 
Large whiterumped swift Apus pacificus, 71) Cochinchina spinetail 
swift Chaetura cochinchinensis PS; 72) Himalayan swift Collocalia 
brevirostris RA & SK 

Family : Trogonidae 

73) Red-headed trogon Harpactes erythrocephalus 



Newsletter for Birdwatchers 



95 



Family : Alcedinidae 

74) Himalayan pied kingfisher Ceryle lugubris; 75) Lesser pied 
kingfisher Ceryle rudis; 76) Small blue kingfisher Alcedo athis, 77) 
Whiteb'reasted kingfisher Halcyon smymensis, 78) Blue-eared 
kingfisher Alcedo meninting PS; 79) Ruddy kingfisher Halcyon 
coromanda PS 

Family : Meropidae 

80) Chestnutheaded bee-eater Merops leschenaultr, 81 ) Bluebearded 
bee-eater Nyctyomis athertoni; 82) Bluetailed bee-eater Merops 
philippinus PS 

Family : Coracidae 

83) Indian roller Coracias benghalensis; 84) Broadbilled roller 
Eurystomus orientalis 

Family : Upupidae 

85) Hoopoe Upupa epops 
Family : Bucerotidae 

86) Rufousnecked hornbill Aceros nipalensis AD?, PS; 87) Wreathed 
hornbill Rhyticeros undulatus; 88) Indian pied hornbill Anthracoceros 
malabaricus; 89) Great pied hornbill Buceros bicornis 

Family : Capitonidae 

90) Great hill barbet Megalaima virens; 91) Lineated barbet 
Megalaima lineata; 92) Bluethroated barbet Megalaima asiatica; 93) 
Blueeared barbet Megalaima australis 

Family : Picidae 

94) Rufous piculet Sasia ochracea; 95) Large yellownaped 
woodpecker Picus flavinucha; 96) Small yellownaped woodpecker 
Picus chlorolophus; 97) Larger goldenbacked woodpecker 
Chrysocolaptes lucidus; 98) Great slaty woodpecker Mulleripicus 
pulverulentusr, 99) Lesser goldenbacked wookpecker Dinopium 
benghalense AD; 100) Fulvous breasted pied woodpecker Picoides 
macei AD; 101) Redeared bay woodpecker Blythipicus pyrrhotis AD; 
102) Speckled piculet Picumnus innominatus PS; 103) Grey-crowned 
pygmy woodpecker Picoides canicapillus PS; 104) Rufous 
woodpecker Micropterus brachyurus, 105) Blacknaped green 
woodpecker Picus canus PS; 106) Pale headed woodpecker 
Gecinulus grantia PS 

Family : Eurylaimidae 

107) Collared broadbill Serilophus lunatus, 108) Long tailed broadbill 
Psarisomus dalhousiae 

Family : Pittidae 

109) Bluenaped pitta Pitta nipalensis RA & SK; 110) Hooded or 
Greenbreasted pitta Pitta sordida PS 

Family : Alaudidae 

111) Bush lark Mirafra assamica PS; 112) Eastern skylark Alauda 
gulgula PS 

Family : Hirundinidae 

113) Swallow Hirundo rustica; 114) Collared sand martin Riparia 
riparia PS, RA & SK? 



Family : Laniidae 

115) Greybacked shrike Lanius tephronotus; 116) Brown shrike 
Lanius cristatus; 117) Rufousbacked shrike blackheaded subspecies 
Lanius schach tricolor PS 

Family : Oriolidae 

118) Blackheaded oriole Oriolus xanthornus; 119) Maroon oriole 
Oriolus traillii 

Family : Dicruridae 

120) Black drongo Dicrurus adsimilis; 121) Grey drongo Dicrurus 
leucophaeus; 122) Bronzed drongo Dicrurus aeneus; 123) Lesser 
racket-tailed drongo Dicrurus remifer, 124) Haircrested drongo 
Dicrurus hottentottus, 125) Greater racket-tailed drongo Dicrurus 
paradiseus 

Family : Artamidae 

126) Ashy swallow-shrike Artamus fuscus 
Family : Sturnidae 

127) Greyheaded mynah Sturnus malabaricus; 128) Pied mynah 
Sturnus contra PS; 129) Common mynah Acridotheres tristis, 130) 
Jungle mynah Acridotheres fuscus PS; 131) Grackle or hill mynah 
Gracula religiosa 

Family : Corvidae 

132) Green magpie Cissa chinensis; 133) Indian tree pie Dendrocitta 
vagabunda RA & SK; 1 34) Blackbrowed tree pie Dendrocitta frontalis; 
135) Himalayan tree pie Dendrocitta formosae; 136) House crow 
Corvus splendens; 137) Jungle crow Corvus macrorhynchos 

Family : Campephagidae 

1 38) Large wood shrike Tephrodornis virgatus; 1 39) Common wood 
shrike Tephrodornis pondicerianus; 140) Large cuckoo shrike 
Coracina novaehollandiae; 141) Smaller grey cuckoo shrike Coracina 
melaschistos; 142) Scarlet minivet Pericrocotus flammeus; 143) 
Longtailed minivet Pericrocotus ethologus; 144) Shortbilled minivet 
Pericrocotus brevirostris; 145) Yellowthroated minivet Pericrocotus 
Solaris PS 

Family : Irendiae 

1 46) Gold fronted chloropsis Chloropsis aurifrons; 1 47) Orangebellied 
chloropsis Chloropsis hardwickir, 148) Fairy bluebird Irena puella; 

149) Common iora Aegithina tiphia 

Family : Pycnonotidae 

150) Blackheaded yellow bulbul Pycnonotus melanicterus, 151) 
Whitecheeked bulbul Pycnonotus leucogenys; 1 52) Redvented bulbul 
Pycnonotus cafer, 153) Redwhiskered bulbul Pycnonotus jocosus; 
1 54) Whitethroated bulbul Crinigerflaveolus; 1 55) Browneared bulbul 
Hypsipetes flavalus, 1 56) Black bulbul Hypsipetes madagascariensis; 

157) Rufous-bellied bulbul Hypsipetes mcclellandi PS 

Family : Muscicapidae 
Subfamily : Timalinae 

1 58) Greyheaded parrotbill Paradoxomis gularis AD; 1 59) Necklaced 
laughing thrush Garrulax moniligerus; 160) Blackgorgeted laughing 



96 



thrush Garrulax pectoralis; 161) Whitecrested laughing thrush 
Garrulax leucolophus Crimson winged laughing thrush Garrulax 
phoeniceus PS; 162) Silver eared mesia Leiothrix argentauris; 163) 
Yellownaped yuhina Yuhina flavicollis; 164) Blackchinned yuhina 
Yuhina nigrimenta AD; 165) Whitebellied yuhina Yuhina zantholeuca; 
166) Nepal babbler Alcippe nipalensis; 167) Longtailed sibia 
Heterophasia picaoides, 168) Abbott's babbler Trichastoma abbotti; 
169) Spotted babbler Phellorneum ruficeps RA & SK; 170) Lesser 
scaly-breasted wren babbler Pnoepyga pusilla; 171) Black-throated 
babbler Stachyris nigriceps; 172) Yellow-breasted babbler 
Macronous gularis; 173) Tickells' babbler Trichastoma tickelli PS; 
174) Marsh spotted babbler Pellorneum palustre PS; 175) 
Blue-winged siva Minla cyanouroptera PS; 176) Red-tailed minla 
Minla ignotincta PS; 177) Spectacled barwing Actinodura egertoniRA 
&SK 

Subfamily : Muscicapinae 

178) Redbreasted flycatcher Muscicapa pan/a; 179) Little pied 
flycatcher Muscicapa westermannr, 180) Large niltava Muscicapa 
grandis; 181) Small niltava Muscicapa macgrigoriae; 182) 
Rufous-bellied niltava Muscicapa sundara AD; 183) Tickell's blue 
flycatcher Muscicapa tickelliae; 184) Verditer flycatcher Muscicapa 
thalassina; 185) Eastern slaty blue flycatcher Muscicapa 
leucomelaneura minuta PS; 186) Brown flycatcher Muscicapa 
latirostris RA & SK; 187) Orange-gorgeted flycatcher Muscicapa 
strophiata; 188) Rufous-breasted blue flycatcher Muscicapa 
hyperythra RA &SK; 189) Ferruginous flycatcher Muscicapa 
ferruginea PS; 190) Pygmy blue flycatcher Muscicapa hodgsoniiRA 
& SK; 191) Greyheaded flycatcher Culicicapa ceylonensis; 192) 
Yellowbellied fantail flycatcher Rhiphidura hypoxantha; 193) 
Whitethroated fantail flycatcher Rhiphidura albicollis; 194) Paradise 
flycatcher Terpsiphone paradisr, 195) Blacknaped flycatcher 
Hypothymis azurea 

Subfamily Sylviinae 

196) Tailor bird Orthotomus sutorius; 197) Tickell's leaf warbler 
Phylloscopus aflinis; 198) Yellow-browed leaf warbler Phylloscopus 
inornatus PS; 1 99) Blackbrowed leaf warbler Phylloscopus cantator, 
200) Slaty bellied ground warbler Tesia olivea; 201 ) Chestnut-headed 
flycatcher warbler Tesia castaneocoronata; 202) Chestnut-headed 
flycatcher warbler Seicercus castaniceps 203) Allied flycatcher 
warbler Seicercus aflinis; 204) Grey-headed flycatcher warbler 
Seicercus xanthoschistos PS; 205) Broad-billed flycatcher warbler 
AbroscopushodgsoniHA & SK; 206) Yellow-bellied flycatcherwarbler 
Abroscopus superciliaris PS 

Subfamily Turdinae 

207) Himalayan rubythroat Erilhacus pectoralis AD; 208) Magpie 
robin Copsychus saularis; 209) Shama Copsychus malabaricus; 
210) Black redstart Phoenicurus ochruros; 211) Daurian redstart 
Phoenicurus auroreus; 212) Guldenstadt's redstart Phoenicurus 
erythrogaster PS; 213) Plumbeous redstart Rhyacornis fuliginosus; 
214) Blackbacked forktail Enicurus immaculatus; 215) Slatybacked 
forktail Enicurus schistaceus; 216) Leschenault's forktail Enicurus 
leschenaultr, 217) Little forktail Enicurus scouleri PS; 218) Collared 



Newsletter for Birdw atchers 

bush chat Saxicola torquata;2\ 9) Dark grey bushchat Saxicola ferrea; 
220) Whitecapped redstart Chaimarrornis leucocephalus; 221) Blue 
rock thrush Monticola solitarius; 222) Blue whistling thrush 
JJIyiophonus caeruleus; 223) Orangeheaded ground thrush Zoothera 
citrina; 224) Greywinged blackbird Turdus boulboul, 225) Lesser 
shortwing Brachypteryx leucophrys RA & SK; 226) Whitebrowed 
shortwing Brachypteryx montana RA & SK; 227) Whitetailed blue 
robin Cinclidium leucurum RA & SK; 228) Orange-flanked bush robin 
Erithacus cyanurus PS; 229) Rufous bellied bush robin Erithacus 
hyperythrus PS; 230) Green cochoa Cochoa viridis 

Family : Cinclidae 

231) Brown dipper Cinclus pallasii 
Family : Paridae 

232) Sultan tit Melanochlora sultanea; 233) Grey tit Paws major RA 
& SK; 234) Black spotted yellow tit Parus spilonotus RA & SK 

Family : Sittidae 

235) Chestnut-bellied nuthatch Sitta castanea; 236) Velvet fronted 
nuthatch Sitta frontalis RA & SK 

Family : Motacillidae 

237) Indian tree pipit Anthus hodgsonr, 238) Paddyfield pipit Anthus 
rufulus PS; 239) Grey wagtail Motacilla cinerea; 240) Pied wagtail 
Motacilla alba 

Family : Dicaeidae 

241) Scarlet backed flowerpecker Dicaeum cruentatum; 242) 
Yellow-vented flowerpecker Dicaeum chrysorrheum PS; 243) 
Plaincolored flowerpecker Dicaeum concolorPS; 244) Fire breasted 
flowerpecker Dicaeum ignipectus RA & SK 

Family : Nectariniidae 

245) Streaked spiderhunter Arachnothera magna; 246) Little 
spiderhunter Arachnothera longirostris PS; 247) Blackbreasted 
sunbird Aethopyga saturata; 248) Nepal yellow backed sunbird 
Aethopyga nipalensis; 249) Rubycheek Anthreptes singalensis; 250) 
Yellow backed sunbird Aethopyga siparaja PS 



Family : Zosteropidae 

251) White-eye Zosterops palpebrosa; 

Family : Ploecidae 
Subfamily Passerinae 



^€ 



252) House sparrow Passer domesticus; 253) Tree sparrow Passer 
montanus PS; 254) Whitebacked munia Lonchura striata 

Family : Fringillidae 

255) Scarlet finch Haematospiza sipahi AD 
Family : Emberizidae 

256) Crested bunting Melophus lathami AD; 257) Little bunting 
Emberiza pusilla PS 



Newsletter for Birdwatchers 



97 




The end of August being the best season, a wildlife study 
tour of Kenyan game reserves was organised by the Bombay 
Natural History Society under the leadership of P.B. Shekar. 
The main focus was on African game animals, yet we saw 
plenty of birds during our visits to Masai Mara, Lake Nakuru, 
Amboseli and Tsao West National Parks. 

Since many African birds are closely related to those of 
India, I thought this article may interest readers of the 
Newsletter. 

Armed with Collin's Field Guide we set out for Masai Mara 
and enroute saw inumerable colonies of Buffalo weaver birds, 
their untidy nests hanging from low boughs. Our first sighting 
was the superb starling Spreo superbus similar to our common 
myna but with brilliant metallic blue green body, chestnut 
underparts with a white band, slaty grey bill. Also its cousin 
Hilderbrant's starling Spreo hilderbranti with its orange red 
eyes feeding on the ground. We noticed the ubiquitous 
anteater chat Myrmecocichia aethiops akin to our pied bush 
chat, glossy black all over with a white shoulder patch. In the 
dry thorn bush near the Sekenani gate we encountered the 
helmeted guinea fowl Numida nitrata with their conspicuous 
cobalt blue head and neck yellow bony crest and red and blue 
wattles. The graceful crowned crane Balearica regulorum, the 
size of demoiselle crane was cocking its head with its crown 
of stiff golden bristles shining in the sun. On the banks of the 
Talek river was a large marabou stork Leptoptilus 
crumeniferus, a scavenging bird very much like an abridged 
version of our adjutant stork. On reaching the riverside tsnted 
camp site we noticed flocks of yellow vented bulbuls 
Pcynonotus goiavia, similar to our redvented species except 
for the yellow vent, perched on the wiremesh of the 
ramshackle dining hall, calling joyously. 

On 27th August, we came across the fear-some looking 
secretary bird Sagittarius serpentarius, a characteristic bird of 
Africa striding through the savanna with its long heeled legs, 
making constant head movements and intently searching the 
grass for prey. A flock of masai ostriches Struthio camelus, 
the largest living birds, was strutting in the bushveld. The 
familiar grey herons Ardea cinerea and yellowbilled egrets 
Mesophoix intermedius similar to our median egret had 
gathered near a stagnant pool while a liliac-breasted roller 
Coracias caudata resembling the Indian roller except for the 
colour flew overhead. 

In our second ride we saw a flock of 20 helmeted guinea 
fowl scratching the ground for insects. In the grassland ahead, 
a group of hungry whitebacked vultures, were pecking fiercely 
at each other and tearing flesh from the carcass of a wild 
beast. On the last day we headed south for Mara river and 
enroute noticed a small group of crested f rancolin Francolinus 
sephaena very similar to our partridges. An eagle sent them 
scurrying and they quickly took cover under a bush. Around 



Glimpses of Kenyan Birdlife 

S. ASHOK KUMAR, IAS (Retd.), Plot 491, Road No. 10, 
Jubilee Hill, Andhra Pradesh 500 033 



Keekorok logde, Hilderbrandt's francolin Francolinus 
hilderbranti scampered at the approach of our Combi, the 
8-seater van. There was a mixed group of male, female and 
baby hippos in the Mara river frolicking in the muddy water. 
African pied wagtails Motacilla aguimp similar to our large pied 
wagtails with white eye-brows but smaller in size were having 
a free ride on the floating islands of hippos. Redbilled 
oxpeckers ortickbirds Buphagus erythrorhynchus resembling 
the greyheaded myna but with pale ashy brown upper parts, 
bare facial area, red bill, blackish legs and yellow orbits like 
our common myna's were picking ticks and flies on the backs 
of hippos which were jostling for space on the river bank like 
oil tankers in a dockyard. While returning to camp we observed 
a group of four black-bellied Hartlaub's bustards Lissotis 
melanogaster akin to the lesser florican but with a short crest 
and prominent black belly in the male and a white belly in the 
female. Near the Naivasha Ebony factory were flocks of pied 
crows Corvus albus with their conspicuous white necks and 
throat. 

Lake Nakuru National park was created in 1 960 as a bird 
sanctuary. A flash of pink along the lake edge turned out to 
be the hundreds of thousands of lesser flamingo 
Phoenichonaias minor and greater flamingo Phoenicopterus 
ruber. The firebirds of the Rift Valley had gathered in this 
shallow alkaline lake to harvest the abundant food supply of 
blue algae. A large flock of white pelicans Pelecanus 
onocrotaluswere foraging alongside the flamingos. According 
to the guide these birds have increased in number after 
introduction of alkaline tolerant fish Talapia grahami in the 
lake. Other waterbirds sighted were the familiar blackwinged 
stilt Himantopus himantopus, greyheaded gull Larus 
cirrocephalus looking like brown-headed gulls in winter 
plumage, blacksmith plover Hoplopterus armatus very much 
like the little ringed plover but larger in size with black cheeks, 
throat, nape and breast, white forehead and crown and black 
spur on wing. The yellowbilled stork or wood ibis Ibis ibis had 
white plumage partly tinged with crimson, black flight feathers 
and tail, red head and yellow bill. The longtailed cormorant 
Phalacrocorax africannes is the large cormorant while the 
cattle egret is the buffbacked heron Ardeola ibis and both were 
found in the company of grey herons. Grey rumped swallows 
Hirundo griseopyga akin to redrumped swallows were making 
crisscross flights overhead while the augur buzzard Buteo 
rufofuscus was gliding effortlessly. Among the sedges and 
reeds we spotted a male Egyptian goose Alopochen 
aegytiacus with white wing coverts, black primaries, green 
secondaries, chestnut patch round eyes and a ring round the 
neck foraging. Red-billed oxpeckers were riding on the back 
of common waterbucks and white rhinos in the grassland. 

In Amboseli a mixed flock of superb starlings including a 
few immature ones with dusky eyes and Hilderbrandt's 
starlings had descended on our breakfast table to partake of 



98 



Newsletter for Birdwatchers 



bread crumbs. They were later joined by whiteheaded buffalo 
weaver birds Dinemellia dinamelli and redbilled buffalo 
weaver birds Bubalornis n/gerslightly larger than baya weaver 
bird. There was a solitary D'arnaud's barbet Trachyphonus 
darnaudin with prominent white and yellow spots. In the first 
game ride a group of yellownecked spurfowl Francolinus 
leucoscepus, masai ostriches and crowned cranes were 
sighted. Amidst the large swamp, cattle egrets were riding on 
elephant back while grey herons, long-tailed cormorants and 
sacred ibis Threskiornis aethiopicus similar to white ibis but 
with iridescent green tipped flight feathers were seeking food. 
African jacana or lily trotter Actophilornis africana looking 
more like the non-breeding pheasant-tailed jacana but with 
chestnut brown body, wings, tail, white neck front and golden 
yellow upper breast was busy among the water lilies while the 
African black crake Limnocorax flavirostra having the profile 
of our brown crake, with black body, greenish-yellow bill, 
flirting its tail like moorhen was hurriedly crossing the reed 
beds. Blacksmith plovers were flying low over the swamp. In 
the Acacia woodland a greenwood hoopoe Phoeniculus 
purpureus, a glossed green and violet bird with a red bill and 
white-tipped long tail was seen. In the low bush near our tent 
we saw for the first time a pair of speckled mouse bird Colis 
striatus, a drab coloured endemic bird of Africa. The guide 
explained that its habit of creeping along the branches like a 
mouse earned its name. In Enkongu Narok swamp were flocks 
of lesser and greater flamingos, white pelicans, cattle egrets 
and sacred ibis. On our way back to the camp we recorded a 
pair of dignified kori bustards Ardeotis kori with mottled black 
and white crown tapering to crest and white "eye brows". While 
savouring the aromatic Kenyan coffee in the shack we noticed 
a bird alighting on a huge tree branch. Focussing our 
binoculars we could see its black beak, pale grey back, head, 
crest, chest and pure white belly. It was identified as a male 
white-bellied go-away-bird Corythaixodes leucogaster, a 
typical African bird. According to the guide its call is harsh 
sheep-like bleat "go-away" and hence its name. We also 



spotted the white-browed coucal Centropus superciliosus 
similar to lesser coucal but with different plumage colouration. 

The last leg of our journey was to Tsavi West. Around 
Kulagani lodge were redbilled hornbills Tockus 
erythrorhynchus with white spots on wing coverts hopping 
from one branch to another. In the vicinity of Tsavo river we 
came across yellowbilled hornbills Tockus flavirostris and a 
pair of Egyptian goose. By dusk we reached Ziwani Tented 
Camp in the heart of the jungle. Over-looking the Thende 
waterhole, this camp is best located for game viewing. While 
sipping tea, one can view in the comfort of a chair hippos, 
crocodiles and other game animals a few metres away. A 
surprise announcement of a night safari thrilled us. We drove 
into the adjoining jungle to see the night life. Besides big game 
we saw thick-knee or spotted stone curlew Burhinus capensis 
closely resembling the stone curlew gazing at the search light 
while a dusky night jar Caprimulgus fraenatus was lying 
huddled on ground. 

Next morning we went bird watching accompanied by an 
experienced guide. Among the extensive sedges and reeds 
of the waterhole we sighted the hadada ibis Hagedashia 
hagedash having the general profile of glossy ibis but with 
olive-grey head, neck and underparts, iridescent green 
showing on back and rounded wings in good light. Other birds 
recorded were the African jacana, African black crake, African 
pied wagtail, marabou stork and Egyptian geese with 
gooselets. In the proximity of the camp we came across the 
greyheaded social weaver bird Philetairus socius and 
goldenbacked or Jackson's weaver bird Ploceus jacksoni. 
Along the bank of the watercourse we saw grey herons, lesser 
Jacana Microparra capensis, crowned plover Vanellus 
coronatus, great white egret Casmerodius albus resembling 
large egret, hammerkop Scopus umbretta with its 
characteristic hammerhead silhouette, greyheaded kingfisher 
Halcyon leucocephalis, pigmy kingfisher Ispidina picta and the 
Tsao purple-banded sunbird Nectarinia tsavoensis similar to 
our purple sunbird. It was time to go and John, the driver 
reminded us of the long journey back to Nairobi. 




At home with the spotted munias 

THOMAS F MARTIN, # 386, 1st Main Road, SFS 407, GKVK Post, 
Yelahanka New Town, Bangalore 560 065 



It was on the 29th August 98, at about 5 p.m., )hat my 
grand daughter Patricia drew my attention to a pair of spotted 
munias Lonchura punctulata perched a foot apart on an 
overhead electric wire above our main gate. The two of them 
were gazing down on a pair of weeping Ashoka trees 
Polyalthia longifolia var. pendula in our front garden. After a 
couple of minutes or so, the pair indulged in a series of dulcet 
notes and faced each other as if in conversation. Then one of 
the pair flew down onto the smaller of the two trees and made 
a series of nods to the right, left, above and below, as if to 
ensure that its actions were not being watched by some 
intruder. It then decided to spring to the larger tree alongside 
and made a hasty entrance into the heavy foliage. After a few 



moments this investigating bird uttered a train of soft 

bi-syllabic whistling notes, not unlike t-sit t-sit. to which 

the partner on the overhead electric wire responded by flying 
down onto the smaller tree alongside the one in which the 
mate was hidden by the foliage. In a very short while the 
confined bird let out a soft sounding call to which the partner 
responded by leaping onto and then entering the foliage that 
ensconced the caller. After what seemed like a couple of 
minutes, the pair of spotted munias emerged from the leafage 
and flew away to a spot in my neighbour's garden. Having 
watched the behaviour of this pair of spotted munias my 
suspicions were aroused, in that the two were seeking out a 
place to build their nest; and I told my grand daughter that the 



Newsletter for Birdwatchers ^^^^^^_^__ 

following day may well confirm my surmise that the pair were 
looking for a suitable nesting site. 

Next morning at about 08.00 tars, the 30th Aug'98, my 
suspicions were confirmed, for the pair of spotted munias were 
now very busily engaged in the task of nest building. They 
were flying in with great speed and haste with lengths of 
approx. 1 /3 metre or so of somewhat dry tubular stalks of grass 
with attached blades trailing from their beaks. This hectic nest 
building activity kindled my imagination and thus gave me the 
urge to cary out a time and motion study on their endeavours. 
So with the aid of my wife Cynthia and grand daughter Patricia, 
I got down to the task of recording the frequency and timings 
of their visit to the nesting site and arrived at the following. The 
birds flew in at almost regular intervals of 2 minutes each, with 
a minute separating their coming to and going away from the 
site of nesting. During each visit the individual bird remained 
inside the leafage for a period ranging from 1 to 1 2 seconds. 
This activity remained the norm for the entire period of the 
days spent by the pair for nest building. On a very conservative 
estimate, each bird made 30 visits per hour to the site; thus 
making a combined total of 60 trips per hour. On this day 
alone, the 30th Aug'98, the pair had laboured for 7 hours 18 
minutes and carried a cumulative length of 144.54 metres of 
grass. 

On the 31 st Aug'98, the pair turned up at 07. 1 hours and 
spent a total of 7 hrs 48 mins in nest building activity, 
employing the same time period of 2 minutes per trip to and 
fro to the site, with a minute separating their coming to and 
going away from the site, and the 10 to 12 seconds each bird 
spent inside the foliage attending to the construction of the 
nest, but with a slight change in the material employed, which 
were long blades of fresh grass in similar lengths of 1/3 metre, 
thus making a running length of 154.44 metres. 

On the 1st Sep'98, the pair turned up rather late and 
laboured for only 3 hrs 18 mins(from 13.05 to 14.38 hrs and 
then again from 15.00 to 16.45 hrs), and utilised broad flat 
blades of fresh green grass in lengths of approx. 1/3 metre. 
Thus a total running length of 65.34 metres of grass was 
employed by the pair of spotted munia. 



99 



On the 2nd Sep '98, the pair resumed their nesting activity 
from 11.25 to 12.55 hrs and then again from 14.45 to 16.30 
hrs (a total of 3 hrs 15 mins), but this time they brought in 
tubular stalks of grass with withered leaves in the usual 
lengths of approx. 1/3 metre; thus totalling 64.35 metres in 
running length. 

On the 3rd Sep'98, the pair spent 1 hr 40 mins in building 
activity and utilised a total of 33.00 metres of dry stalks of 
g rass. The pair were not to be seen after completing their work 
(which lasted from 1 0.23 to 1 2.03 hrs) until about 6 p.m. when 
they returned and entered the foliage in the weeping Ashoka 
tree to settle down for the night. 

On the 4th Sep'98, the pair were conspicuous by their 
absence until they showed up at around 6.1 5 p.m. and settled 
down in the nest for the night. 

The weeping Ashoka tree in which the nest is built is three 
years old and stands 5 metres high. The nest is located at a 
height of roughly 3 metres, but due to the long slender 
drooping branches with heavy leafage the nest is not visible 
to the naked eye, except by pushing aside a few of the slender 
branches and peeping through the inner openings. This I did 
on the very first day of nest building, when the birds were 
away, in order to ascertain the height of the nest, but desisted 
from further intrusions so as not to disturb their tranquillity and 
wellbeing. 

The spotted munias had spent a total of 23 hrs 19 mins 
in labour, and carried a total running length of approx. 461 .67 
metres of grasses of sorts in the 1399 trips they undertook 
during the nest building. Verily an amazing feat of endurance 
and tenacity for so small a bird as the spotted munia. 

In view of the confined nature of the nest and the aversion 
I have to disturb the birds in any way, I now look forward to 
the arrival of the chicks in the hope of listening in to their 
plaintive calls for food, and to the moment when they emerge 
from the foliage to take wing. 




Sighting of a rare species of bird 
at Thiruvananthapuram 



K.B. SANJAYAN, T.C.XII/1082, Law College Road, Kunnukuzhy P.O., Thiruvananthapuram 695 037, Kerala 






I participated in the bird survey conducted by Warblers 
and Waders in the Wyanad wildlife sanctuary in December 
1996. 1 returned home on 27th December, after the week long 
survey, and on the very next day, an unusual bird was 
observed in the backyard of my residence at Barton Hill, 
Thiruvananthapuram. 

My house stands in the middle of a compound measuring 
8.08 Acre. There are a few wild trees in the compound : 
coralwood Adenanthera pavonina, Indian coral tree Erythrina 
indica, Vatta Macaranga roxburghii, Vengai Bridelia 
squamosa, Margossa Azadirachta indica and also jack tree 
Artocarpus heterophyllus. Even though the area has been 
fragmented into tiny residential blocks with the rapid growth 



of the city, three adjoining plots belonging to Dr. Kurien 
Chandy, Mr. Pereira and this writer have escaped this general 
trend. It reamins vegetated and a good habitat for birds. 

As stated above the bird was first sighted in the backyard 
of this house on 28 Dec. 1996. Thereafter it was seen almost 
regularly, except for three or four days. It was always seen 
single. 

The bird was akin to the Indian blue chat, but slightly 
larger. At first sight it was persumed to be an Indian pitta but 
its characteristic greenish colouraiton was totally absent (Pitta 
had been sighted and recorded in this compound in the winter 
of 1968 and 1983) 



100 



Newsletter for Birdwatchers 



The sighting was first reported by Rohith at the monthly 
meeting of Warblers and Waders on 4 January 1 997. With the 
help of C. Susanthkumar, Co-ordinator, Warblers and 
Waders, the species was conclusively identified as 
Orangeheaded ground thrush Zoothera citrina. 

The head, neck and chest are dull orange, while the wings 
are smoky blue in colour. There is a white patch on the greater 
wing coverts which is visible while resting. The tail is short and 
wedge-shaped and its ventral side is white. There are white 
under tail coverts also. The beak is sturdy and brownish black, 
the legs are pale yellow. The tarsus is very slender and slightly 
elongate^ which looks like continuation of an almost straight 
shank. The shank is covered thickly with white tiny plumes. 
There is a white spot on the lower belly at the point where the 
shanks meet the body. 

The bird was seen hopping about on the ground under 
the trees. It feeds on tiny worms, ant lions, termites, maggots, 
spiders, grubs etc usually by upturning dead leaves. It takes 
to the lower branches of small trees when disturbed. When 
the disturbance ends it returns to the ground. It is seen actively 
searching for its prey in the mornings by even resorting to fast 
runs whereas in the evenings it is less active. It is greatly 
inclined to perch on tree stumps which are hardly a foot in 
height or on granites strewn on the ground, especially in the 
evenings. It continues to sit motionless up to thirty minutes at 
a stretch or until a worm attracts it. 

During the month of January, it used to roost by about 
6.00 p.m. By the middle of March the roosting was at late as 
6.40 p.m. Before roosting it drank water from an earthen pot 
kept under the trees, cleansed its beak by rubbing against a 
twig and flew to different trees in increasing height and finally 
roosted in the jack tree. The branch selected was about 24 
feet from the ground. On some other days it roosted on 
another jack tree in a neighbouring plot. 

On subsequent mornings, it was again observed on the 
ground vigorously engaged in feeding. In the month of 
January it was seen spending the whole day in the same plot, 
but in early March it was seen only in early mornings and 
evenings. In between it must have been in neighbouring villas. 

Amazingly the bird did not chirp even once until the third 
week of March. But on 20th March 1997, it got a companion, 
a whitethroated ground thrush. In the evening just before 
roosting it made a harsh alarm-like screech with regular 
pauses in between. It again chirped on subsequent evenings. 
One book states its call as 

"a peculiar loud whistle, something like the screeching of 
a slate pencil a pleasant song". 

The whitethroated ground thrush was again observed on 
23rd March at about 1 1 .00 am for 30-35 mintues. Then there 
was a small duel between them and the whitethroated ground 
thrush flew away. 

The orangeheaded ground thrush is a rare bird as far as 
the state of Kerala is concerned. Shri K.K. Neelakantan has 
not included it in his Magnum Opus, Keralathile Pakshikaf 2 
(Birds of Kerala) whereas he has mentioned about another 
subspecies, whitethroated ground thrush Zoothera citrina 
cyanotus. Dr. Salim Ali has also not mentioned this species in 
the "Birds of Travancore" 3 . It is obvious that this is a rare visitor 
to this State. Dr. Salim Ali states "it winters in the subcontinent 
locally; Sri Lanka; Andaman and Nicobar Is" 4 . 



The only two references I have on this bird having been 
sighted earlier are from my friend, Shri C. Susanthkumar, who 
has observed it twice in the backyard of his residence at Indira 
Nagar, Thiruvananthapuram in 1985 5 . On March 20, 1986 he 
had again observed a pair of orangeheaded ground thrush at 
Kallar Valley, 45 km east of Thiruvananthapuram in the 
foothills of Western Ghats. He states "It was early in the 
afternoon (March 1 986). But the rain forest in the Kallar Valley 

was dark and gloomy. The forest was silent Luck 

seemed to have favoured me that day. As I turned a corner, I 
noticed two orangeheaded ground thrushes feeding in the 
narrow path. It is one of the rarest winter visitors of Kerala 6 ". 
However the bird finds a place in the Book of Kerala Birds It 
is^also included in the field guide, "Important birds of Periyar 8 ". 
A Field Guide to Birds of South East Asia gives its range from 
West Pakistan to S. China, Hainan, Andamans, Nicobars, 
Greater Sundas . 

The bird is observed in Thiruvananthapuram for the first 
time in a decade. It is noteworthy that of the three recorded 
sightings of this bird since 1 985, two are from the heart of the 
city, obviously revealing the birds inclination for a metropolitan 
habitat. 

The sighting has been reported in the Nature View 
Newsletter . Being a rare visitor there was a constant flow of 
bird watchers to observe it. Apart from C. Susanthkumar, M. 
Ramesh, S. Rajeevan, K. A. Kishore, R. Jayaprakash, K. 
Rafeek, Neetha, Babu P. Ramesh et al of Warblers and 
Waders have observed it and studied the habits. M. Ramesh 
has succeeded in photographing this rare visitor which was 
also published in the Nature View Newsletter. 

The exact habits of the bird, especially its migratory 
trends, have to be closely observed and studied. The bird was 
last observed on 3rd April 1997. 

In the 1997-98 season also the bird did land on this 
particular spot, on 1 6 Dec. 1 997. It spent the whole day in the 
plot, but it resumed its southward journey thereafter probably 
to its destination in Jaffna (?) It was not spotted thereafter. 

I thank C. Susanthkumar for his consistent 
encouragement in observing and recording the habits of the 
bird and M. Ramesh for painstakingly photographing it. I also 
thank K. Rafeek for the constant encouragement given by him 
for preparing this report for publication in the Newsletter. 



References : 

King, Ben F and Dickenson, Edward C : A Field Guide to Birds of 
South East Asia. Reprinted 1991. p 346. 

Neelakantan, K.K : Keralathile Pakshikal (In Malayalam) Ed 3 
March 1996. p 413. 

Ali, Salim Dr : Birds of Travancore and Cochin. 1 953. 

Ali, Salim Dr : Book of Indian Birds. Ed 12 Feb 1996. p 60. 

Susanthkumar, C : Personal communications. 1 997. 

Susanthkumar, C : Birds of Ponmudi Hills and Kallar Valley 1 989. 

Neelakantan, K.K : Ed. Book of Kerala Birds. 1990 

Kerala Forest Dept. : Important Birds of Periyar. March 1995. 
p58. 

Same as Ref No. 1 

Warblers & Waders : Nature view Newsletter No. 3 March 1997. 
P 4. 



Newsletter for Birdwatchers 



101 




Unexplored Wetland Of Uttar Pradesh 

MOHD. ZAFAR-UL ISLAM, Bombay Natural History Society, Hornbill House, 

S.B. Singh Road, Mumbai 400 023 



Uttar Pradesh is very rich as far as wetlands are 
concerned. Some are remarkable for their floral and faunal 
diversity. One of them is "Rati Ka Nagla (RKN)". 

Location 

Rati-ka-Nagla wetland is about 400 acres, 13 kms from 
the Sikandra Rao Tehsil of Aligarh district, and 55 kms east 
of Aligarh city. It is perennial and receives water from rain and 
also from small canals. Fortunately Water Hyacinth Eichornia 
crassipes is present only in a small part of the wetland. 

In the last week of February 1997 when winter was 
blinking its eyes and ready to say good bye and inviting the 
scorching summer to help wheat to ripen, we started our 
excursion to Patna Bird Sanctuary. This team consisted of 
eminent ornithologist Dr Asad R. Rahmani and other students 
of Centre of Wildlife, AMU, Aligarh. We enjoyed immensely 
the bird sanctuary where we saw thousands of birds. In the 
last week of February 1 997 on the way back from Patna Bird 
Sanctuary to Aligarh, we were watching hundreds of birds 
flying to neighbouring wetlands. We decided to investigate 
and followed the flight of the birds. After about 1 km we came 
to a flat area which apparently was covered with vegetation. 
A flock of ducks appeared and settled about 500 m away. 
When we searched thoroughly, we found that we were 
standing near a huge wetland with thick growth of emergent 
and floating vegetation. I climbed on the top of the vehicle and 
saw that further up, the water surface was free from vegetation 
but it was covered with an immense number of ducks. We 
decided to return to Aligarh. 

After a week we again went to explore Rati ka Nagla. We 
reached there by noon. We were surprised to see how 
beautiful it was! The whole jheel was full of birds, however less 
in number compared to the last visit one week back because 
the majority of birds had started flying back to their breeding 
areas. We felt that it could be an ideal foraging habitat for the 
Siberian crane. 

In the evening we saw flocks and flocks of Sarus crane 
Grus antigone coming to the jheel for roosting. We counted 
nearly 115 Sarus. I have never seen such a congregation of 
Sarus in my life. Another interesting observation was a roost 
of about 75 harriers on the ground. 



Conservation 

The villages surrounding Rati-ka-Nagla are dominated by 
Thakurs, Yadavs and Gujars. They regularly hunt birds and 
other small animals. While we were observing birds, we saw 
poachers at the far corner of the jheel. The wetland is 
surrounded by waste land locally known as "Usar", but 
villagers have started converting Usar into crop fields. Since 
British days the Jheel has been a haven for hunters, but now 
it must be conserved in the interest of wildlife and humanity 
alike. 

Checklist of birds of Rati-ka-Nagla (Jheel) and its 
surrounding areas 

1) Little grebe Podiceps ruficollis, (2) Little cormorant Phalacrocorax 
niger, (3) Darter Anhinga rula; (4) Grey heron Ardea cinerea; (5) 
Cattle egret Bubulcus ibis; (6) Large egret Ardea alba; (7) Smaller 
egret Egretta intermedia; (8) Little egret Egretta garzetta; (9) Painted 
stork Mycteria leucocephala; (10) Openbill stork Anastomus oscitans; 
(11) Whitenecked stork Ciconia episcopus; (12) Blacknecked stork 
Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus; (13) White ibis Threskiomis aethiopica; 
(15) Spoonbill Platalea leucorodia; (16) Greylag goose Anseranser, 
(17) Barheaded goose Anser indicus; (18) Ruddy shelduck Tadorna 
ferruginea; (19) Pintail Anas acuta; (20) Common teal Anas crecca; 
(21) Spotbilled duck Anas peocilorhyncha; (22) Mallard Anas 
platyrhynchos; (23) Wigeon Anas penelope; (24) Garganey Anas 
querquedula; (25) Shoveler Anas clypeata; (26) Redcrested pochard 
Netta rufina; (27) Cotton teal Nettapus coromandelianus; (28) Comb 
duck Sarkidiomis melanotos; (29) Pariah kite Milvus migrans govinda; 
(30) Whitebacked vulture Gyps bengalensis; (31) Egyptian vulture 
Neophron percnopterusr, (32) Common peafowl Pavo cristatus, (33) 
Sarus crane Grus antigone; (34) Whitebreasted waterhen Amaurornis 
phoenicurus; (35) Moorhen Gallinula chloropusr, (36) Coot Fulica atra; 
(37) Redwattled lapwing Vanellus indicus; (38) Redshank Tringa 
totanus; (39) Greenshank Tringa nebularia; (40) Ruff & reeve 
Philomachus pugnax, (41) Indian river tern Sterna aurantia; (42) 
Crow-pheasant Centropus sinensis; (43) Pied kingfisher Ceryle rudis, 
(44) Whitebreasted kingfisher Halcyon smymensis, (45) Green 
bee-eater Merops orientalis, (46) Crested lark Galerida cristata; (47) 
Wiretailed swallow Hirundo smithii; (48) Grey shrike Lanius excubitor, 
(49) Black drongo Dicrurus adsimilis, (50) Common myna 
Acridotheres tristis, (51) Bank myna Acridotheres ginginianus; (52) 
House crow Corvus splendens; (53) Stone chat Saxicola torquata; 
(54) Pied bushchat Saxicola caprata; (55) Large pied wagtail 
Motacilla maderaspatensis; (56) House sparrow Passer domesticus 



102 



Newsletter for Birdwatchers 



c 



ABSTRACT 



3 



BIRDING IN THE ANDAMANS. PROF. A. RELTON, Staff 
Advisor, Nature Club, Bishop Hebbar College, Trichy62001 7, 
Tamil Nadu 

Professor Relton spent six weeks in the Andamans (and 
recorded 1 1 1 species of birds including 26 endemics. He says 
that 242 species and subspecies are reported of which 95 
species (39.5% are endemics). The dangers of introducing 
species into the islands are well known, yet the following birds 
have been introduced — the house sparrow, common myna, 
grey partridge, pea fowl. 

There are 1 5 wildlife sanctuaries and national parks in the 
Andamans covering an area of 640 sq kms (18% of the land 
surface). The author emphasises the following conservation 
problems. 




C2T— •- 






JIuTTli ANDAMAN .»• 

lHOT,A y ^STUDyAAlA 




MEAT WCO»A* 
INOIAN KM" 



Rich forests are still being clear felled. 

Many Nicobaris are now using air guns Most of the 

birds they shoot are endemics including rare birds 
such as pigeons, doves and megapodes. 

Trade in wildlife continues with South East Asian 
countries. Parakeets and hill m'ynas are exported in 
large numbers. 

Since tribals have special rights in protected areas, 
people on the mainland use these loopholes to 
engage in illegal trade in wildlife. 



• An impressive list of references is given which is 
reproduced here. 

References 

Abdulali, H. (1965). The Birds of Andaman and Nicobar Islands. 
JBNHS, 61(3): 483-571, 

Abdulali, H. (1 967). More New Races of Birds form the Andaman 
and Nicobar Islands. JBNHS, 63(2) : 420-422, 

Abdulali, H. (1967). The Birds of the Nicobar Islands with notes 
on some Andaman Birds. JBNHS, 64(2) : 139-190, 

Abdulali, H. (1981). Additional notes on Andaman Birds. JBNHS, 
78(1): 46-49, 

Bhattee, S.S. (1986). Forest and Forestry in the Andaman and 
Nicobar Islands, Forest Department, Port Blair, 

Ali, S. and S.D. Ripley (1983). Hand Book of the Birds of India 
and Pakistan (Compact Edition), Oxford University Press, 

Kailash, C. and K. Sanjeev (1994). Observation on Avifauna of 
Great Nicobar Island, India. Indian Forester, October 1994, 
953-955, 

Kailash, C. and P.T. Rajan (1996). Observations on the Avifauna 
of Mount Harriett National Park, South Andaman (A&N 
Island). Indian Forester, October 1996, 965-968, 

Hume, A.O. (1874). Additional notes on the Avifauna of the 
Andaman Islands. Stray Feathers, 2 : 470-501, 

Hume, A.O. (1876). Additional notes on the Avifauna of the 
Andaman Islands. Sfray Feathers, 4 : 279-294, 

Subba Rao (1879). Fauna and Andaman and Nicobar Islands: 
Diversity, Endemism, Endangered Species and Conservation 
Strategies : E.I. A. Report on A&N and Lakshadweep Islands. 
Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. Ltd. Edited by Cecil J. Saldanha, 
pp 74- 82, 

South Wood, T.R.E. (1978). Ecological Methods, Chapman and 
Hall, London. 

4 4 4 

NEST MAKING AND BREEDING OF THE PURPLE 
RUMPED SUNBIRDS. Dr. SATISH A. PANDE, C-9, Bhosale 
Park, Sahakamagar-2, Pune-9 

The author has done a remarkable job in observing the 
nest making of a pair of purplerumped sunbirds in his garden 
in Pune. 

In the last week of March 1 997, "in 8 days the typical pear 
shaped suspended nest made of twigs, dry grass blades, 
cobwebs, spider droppings, threads, plastic, paper and hair, 
with the classical portico was completed. The inner lining was 
of white soft cotton. The male was definitely seen assisting 
the female. With the daylight span of 12.5 hours an average 
of 65-70 visits were made to the nest in a day ... 2 eggs were 
laid over 24 hours. During her brief absence from the nest, the 



Newsletter for Birdwatchers 



103 



male kept vigil from an overhanging branch but was never 
seen incubating. 

During a storm the nest collapsed and one of the chicks 
fell off. Dr. Pande repaired the next and replaced the chick not 
in the original nest but on a support created near the nest. It 
was observed that the injured (chick) was continually pushed 
out by (the other). The author has supplied the following 
information about his observations. 

1. Nesting period of purplerumped sunbirds is variable. 
The present nesting was in April-May. I have seen 
nesting in October in the same locality. 

2. The usual clutch is of two/three. 

3. Nests are subject to damage from unseasonal rain. 

4. Parents accept nest repair with cloth. 

5. If one sib is in the nest and the other in an artificial nest, 
the latter is not fed. 

6. Only if the original nest is broken, the replaced sibs in 
the alternative nest, close to the original nest, are fed 
by the parents. 

7. I have once observed that before the hatching of the 
eggs a purple rumped sunbirds' nest was destroyed by 
rain and the eggs broke. The pair quickly rebuilt a nest 
on an adjacent tree and successfully reared a new 
clutch of three. 

8. The females of the purple rumped sunbird have a red 
iris, while those of a purple sunbird have a brown iris. 

9. Injured sibs are neglected by the family. 

4 4 4 

UNUSUAL TAIL PATTERN OF BRONZED DRONGO 

(DICRURUS AENEUS) R. SHYAMA PRASAD RAO, 
Biosciences Dept, Mangalore University, Konaje 574 199 

The author says that on 5th Jan 1988 he saw a bronzed 
drongo "with a pentaigitate fan like feathers instead of (the) 
usual blunt forked tail feathers". V. Santharam comments that 
the 'forked' appearance is often lost during the moulting. 
Moulting involves extra energy. The timing of the moult "is 
done when food is available in abundance". Hence the timing 
depends partly on food availability. 



4 4 4 



C 



CORRESPONDENCE 



") 



GREY BABBLER ATTACKING ITS REFLECTION. J.L 

SINGH, D-3/1, Rites Flats, Ashok Vihar (Phase 3), New Delhi 
110 052 

In the late 70s, I was posted in Bhavnagar and was 
allotted one of the old colonial-style bungalows to live in. The 
building was a rambling affair with a broad and wide verandah 



all around. Near the main entrance was a mirror, which most 
such bungalows had in the era they were built. 

The compound in which the bungalow stood had both a 
kitchen as well as a flower garden. Bird life was thus ubiquitous 
and abundant. Almost from the first day that I moved into this 
bungalow, I noticed that a grey babbler (Turdoides malcolmi) 
regularly approached the mirror and fought with its own 
reflection. There was a small ledge in front of the mirror on 
which the babbler stood and pecked at its reflection quite 
vigorously. I had no way of knowing if it was the same bird or 
if a new one continued the struggle day after day. I was in this 
bungalow for roughly a year and my estimate is that the 
babbler must have had its fight at least 60-70% of the days. 

The interesting thing is that there were many other birds 
in the area, a large number of which came into the verandah. 
No other species indulged in this behavior. At other times I 
have seen house sparrows {Passef domesticus) displaying 
similar activity but not in Bhavnagar. • 

I forgot about this till recently. I am now posted in Delhi 
and about a month back was taking a walk in one of Delhi's 
many gardens. On the fringe of a garden in Ashok Vihar in the 
North of the city, was a parked scooter. As I walked past the 
scooter, I noticed that a grey babbler was busy fighting itself 
in the rear view mirror of the scooter. Since there was no ledge 
in front of this mirror, the bird was having difficulty balancing 
itself on the shaft on which the mirror was fixed. But without 
much ado, the babbler was fighting itself with abandon. 

I may have overlooked this but on two more occasions in 
the same scooter stand, I have seen a grey babbler fighting 
its reflection. The area has Jungle babblers (T.striatus) also, 
perhaps in greater numbers, but the fight is only by the grey 
babbler. 

4 4 4 

KOEL BOOM AT JODHPUR. ISHWAR PRAKASH, Desert 
Regional Station, Zoological Survey of India, Jodhpur342 009 

Urbanisation is usually considered a major factor for the 
shrinkage of biodiversity in a region. My observations during 
the last fortysix years in the desert city of Jodhpur prove to be 
an exception to this concept. 

When I moved in Jodhpur during 1952, it was spread 
hardly over five square kilometers. Water was a scarce 
commodicty. The vegetation within the town was mostly khejri, 
Prosopis spicigera and the vilayati bobool, Prosopis juliflora. 
The sand dunes in the southeastern fringes were studded with 
bordi, Ziziphus nummularia and bekaria, Tephrosia purpurea. 
The rocks in the west were full of thor, Euphorbia caducifolia 
and a herb, goondi, Cordia gharaf. Accordingly, the avian 
fauna was mostly deserticolous : doves, pigeons, abundant 



104 



Newsletter for Birdwatchers 



crows, kites and lots of vultures. On the outskirts larks, 
wheatears, common myna and babblers were commonly 
found. During the monsoon, we rarely used to hear Koel's 
music and it used to be a big attraction to children as well as 
the adults. 

During the last four and half decades, Jodhpur city has 
spread over more than 20 kilometers, all sand dunes have 
been levelled, the adjoining hillocks have turned into greenery 
though a large number of buildings have been constructed 
overthem. Along with this expansion, three eco-friendly efforts 
occurred. Drinking water was made available through a canal 
from Jawai dam, about 175 kms down south in the Aravalli 
range. Secondly, the Jodhpur municipality formulated rules to 
construct houses only on about 60% per cent of the plot size. 
Thirdly, the Central Arid Zone Research Institute distributed 
trees (mostly neem) and ornamental plants (bougainvillaea) 
free of charge. Because of available free space, the people 
took to their hearts to grow neem trees and ornamental plants 
in their compounds. As a consequence the desert city has now 
changed to a well vegetated city with a large number of trees. 
With the revegetation of the town the first to appear was crow 
pheasant, then the golden oriole and during the last three 
years, the koel population has enhanced so much that their 
Kuhu-kuhu sometimes turn into intolerable cacophony. We 
conducted a reconnaisance survey of the expanded city and 
found that 4-6 koels are inhabiting every colony, usually 
roosting on neem trees as permanent residents. However, the 
crow population has noticeably gone down. 

Urbanisation, if carried out in an eco-friendly manner, can 
be a boon to bird life in a city. 

4 4 4 

BLACK BULBULS ASSOCIATION WITH MELIA 

AZEDARACH. M.L. NARANG and R.S. RANA, AINP on 
Agricultural Ornithology, University of Horticulture & Forestry, 
Solan (H.P.). 

This is in response to Dr. S. Thirumurthi and C.P. 
Banumathi's observations on Melia azedarachtree which they 
describe as keystone species for frugivorous birds in HP., 
Newsletter for Birdwatchers, 38(4), July/Aug 1998. 

We have been working on bird-tree association in this 
university campus for the last five years and have made a 
detailed study of birds interacting with trees/shrubs for fruits 
and nectars. Melia azedarach a common tree in the mid-hills 
of H.P. produces fruits which ripen during winter. Flocks of 
black bulbuls descend on these trees during winter and feed 
on Melia fruits from dawn to dusk. But it is not correct to state 
that no other wild fruit is available for.frugivores during winter. 
Even black bulbuls have been recorded to feed on 
fruits/berries of Ehretia accuminata, Rosa muschata, and 
Celtis australis during the month of January although these 
birds prefer to feed on fruits of Melia during the months of 



December-February when these fruits are available in plenty. 
When the fruits on the trees are finished, black bulbuls 
descend on the ground beneath the trees of Melia and feed 
on fallen fruits. But apart from occasional foraging by 
Himalayan bulbuls, no other avian frugivore has been 
recorded to feed on fruits of Melia during our five years of 
observations. So Melia azedarach could in no way be 
described as a 'keystone' species as described by the authors. 
Though wild fruits like Bauhinia variegata, Celtis australis, 
Rosa muschata and Ethretia accuminata are available to 
avian frugivores during winter the status of 'keystone' species 
could be given to Celtis australis which sustains nine species 
of avian frugivores during winter months as has already been 
reported by us at Pan-Asian Ornithological Congress and XII 
Birdslife Asia Conference held at Coimbatore in Nov., 1966 
(Abstract P.52). The avian species recorded feeding on fruits 
of Celtis australis are : (in order of relative abundance) 

(1) Common myna Acridotheres tristis; (2) Himalayan bulbul 
Pycnonotus leucogenys; (3) Grey treepie Dendrocitta formosae; (4) 
Alexandrine parakeet Psittacula eupatria; (5) Rufous treepie 
Dendrocitta vagabunda; (6) Plum-headed parakeet Psittacula 
cyanocephala; (7) Bluethroated barbet Megalaima asiatica; (8) Black 
bulbul Hypsipetes madagascariensis; (9) Redvented bulbul 
Pycnonotus cafer 

The detailed study has already been submitted for 
publication. 

4 4 4 

SAVE THE HERONRY AT MATHIKERE. DR. J.C. UTTANGI, 
Convener, Dharwad Bird Club, 36, Mission Compound, 
Dharwad 580 001 

It is shocking to hear that the age old Ficus tree standing 
in front of the bus-stand at Mathikere about 70 km from 
Bangalore may be axed down because of the proposed 
Mysore Highway. This huge tree has been serving many 
waterfowl species like the grey heron, little cormorant and 
night heron as a heronry to nest and breed. On February 2nd 
1997, a visit to this heronry was made by a group of 
birdwatchers from Dharwad, Hubli and Haveri towns. It was a 
spectacular sight to watch the Grey herons pairing. There 
were 40 pairs of grey herons, 20 pairs of little cormorants and 
10-15 pairs of night herons. Grey herons are diminishing and 
it would be a folly to cut this tree. 

[Citizens of Bangalore and Mysore recall with sadness the 
large scale slaughter of the Ficus and Banyan trees on the 
Hosur road when the highway was built a few years ago. A 
representation is being made to the Public Works Department 
that during the construction of the Highway from Bangalore to 
Mysore some of the more spectacular and ecologically 
valuable trees should not be destroyed. In this connection, the 



Newsletter for Birdwatchers 



105 



letter from J.C. Uttangi is welcome and other readers of the 
Newsletter are requested to write if they are aware of any trees 
that need to be saved]. 

Editor 

4 4 4 

SPOTTED BILLED PELICAN IN JAKKUR LAKE, 
BANGALORE. GEORGE VERGHESE, Centre for 
Environment and Education, Infantry Road, Bangalore 
560001 

I am a regular visitor to the Jakkur area as part of my 
research sampling on dung beetles. For the past two years, I 
have been visiting Jakkur lake area and seen many common 
water birds. These include pond herons, cattle egrets, little 
egrets, little grebes, coots and whitebreasted and pied king 
fishers. I have at times seen grey herons and blackwinged 
stilts. 

Of late Jakkur lake's water level has gone up due to heavy 
monsoon showers. It was 8th September 1998 around 
10.30 am as I and my assistant proceeded towards the lake 
for sampling, scores of coots, little grebes and some egrets 
could be spotted here and there. However, I was taken aback, 
by the presence of a single huge whitish bird, swimming 
gracefully at one end of the lake. At the first sight itself, I knew 
it was a pelicanW. I slowly moved towards it and in no time I 
knew it was the spotted billed pelican (Pelecanus philippensis) 
with typical spots beneath its beak. 

This was the first time, I have seen one during my two 
years of visits to Jakkur lake. After sometime, it quietly took 
off towards Yelahanka leaving me wondering whether it was 
a "Losf wanderer". 

4 4 4 

LARGE CLUTCH SIZE IN GREY FRANCOLIN 
(FRANCOLINUS PONDICERIANUS). J.K. TIWARI, 
Assistant Manager (Wildlife and Environment), Nature 
Conservation Centre, Sanghi Industries Ltd. (Cement 
Division), Sanghipuram, Motiber, Abdasa, Kutch, 
Gujarat 370 655 

The grey francolin Francolinus pondicerianus is a 
common and widely distributed species in Kutch. My studies 
in Kutch with the BNHS projects over six years in the Banni 
grasslands and other areas indicate that the grey francolin 
numbers have increased with the spread in the cover of the 
exotic weed "Prosopis juliflora". 

The nests of grey francolins are concealed inside clumps 
of grass. The nesting season is generally before the monsoon. 
On 8th May 1998 I came across a nest of the grey francolin. 
The nest was in a tussock of grass well concealed. There were 
1 1 eggs in the nest. I have never seen such a big clutch of 



grey francolins. Another nest in the Nature Conservation 
Centre had seven eggs. The biggest clutch (but how many 
eggs? Editor) so far reported was by Eates(?) (Unpublished 
manuscript notes) seen in Sind, Pakistan (T.J. Roberts 1991), 
The Birds of Pakistan, pp 232-233. 

4 4 4 

DARTERS & LITTLE EGRETS NESTING IN GUDAVI BIRD 
SANCTUARY. GURUNATH DESAI, Civil Engineer & 
Contractor, 31, Ashok Nagar, Hubli 580 032 

On 9th August 1 998, 25 members of the YHAI, Dharwad 
Chapter were on a bird watching visit to Gudavi Bird Sanctuary 
(GBS) situated in Shimoga district (Karnataka). The sanctuary 
spreads over 182 acres with a large lake in its centre. 
Deciduous forests, grasslands, marshes, paddy and 
pineapple fields surround the sanctuary. 

Having reached Gudavi at 12.30 pm, we were in for a 
surprise. There were literally hundreds of darters nesting. I am 
told that darters are getting endangered and so seeing such 
a large flock at Gudavi was indeed a pleasure. Over 2000 + 
white ibises were also nesting, and semifinished ibis nests 
were in the process of completion. 

Another surprise was the presence of well over 1000 
nests of little egrets. 

The other birds seen were little cormorants (2000); Indian 
shag (300); night heron (100); pond herons (50); large egrets 
(10); coots (50); bronze-winged jacana (2); purple moorhen 
(2). 

According to Salim AN darters, little egrets and white 
ibises, breed in November to February in South India, where 
as all these birds were nesting at Gudavi in the month of 
August. 

My sincere thanks to Shri S.G. Neginhal for his guidance. 

4 4 4 

ASIAN ANATIDAE ATLAS. ASAD R. RAHMANI, Director, 
Bombay Natural History Society, Hombill House, Shaheed 
Bhagat Singh Road, Mumbai 400 023, Maharashtra 

The Wetlands International is planning a publication of a 
preliminary inventory of habitat of international importance for 
Anatidae (ducks, geese and swans) in the form of Asian 
Anatidae Atlas. It will complement the Wetlands 
Internationals' (Wl) publication of Atlas of Anatidae 
Populations of Africa and Western Eurasia, which covers 
some common species and populations. Two basic criteria 
are used to identify internationally important sites > 20,000 
individuals of Anatidae supported, and > 1% of a population 



106 



Newsletter for Birdwatchers 



of more than one Anatidae species supported. These criteria 
are compatible with the Ramsar criteria for identification of 
wetlands of international importance. 

The Wetlands International has identified BHNS to 
collect, collate and analyse information from India. The time 
schedule is very tight. In order to achieve this target, we seek 
your co-operation. Information is needed to identify key sites 
for each species throughout its range and we seek the 
following : 

Name of the site: 

Coordinates of centre of the site; 

Protected status of the site; protected/partially 
protected/not protected/unknown; 

Population size/estimate the site supported; number, 
date/month/year, published or unpublished reference(s). 

All persons providing information for the preparation of 
the publication will be duly acknowledged and will receive a 
complimentary copy of the publication. 

For India, information on the following species is required: 

1 ) Siberian redbreasted goose Branta rulicollis, 2) Bean goose Anser 
fabalis; 3) Whitef ranted goose Anser albifrons, 4) Lesser whitef ronted 
goose Anser erythropus, 5) Greyleg goose Anser anser, 6) 
Barheaded goose Anser indicus; 7) Bewick's swan Cygnus bewickir, 
8) Whooper swan Cygnus cygnus; 9) Mute swan Cygnus olor, 10) 
Lesser whistling teal Dendrocygna javanica; 1 1.) Large whistling teal 
Dendrocygna bicolor, 12) Ruddy shelduck Tadorna ferruginea; 13) 
Common shelduck Tadorna tadorna; 14) Marbled teal Marmaronetta 
angustirostris; 1 5) Pintail Anas acuta; 1 6) Common teal Anas crecca; 
17) Baikal teal Anas formosa; 18) Grey teal Anas gibberifrons; 19) 
Spotbill duck Anas poecilorhyncha; 20) Mallard Anas platyrhynchos; 
21 ) Gadwal Anas strepera; 22) Falcated teal Anas falcata; 23) Wigeon 
Anas penelope; 24) Garganey Anas querquedula; 25) Shoveller Anas 
clypeata; 26) Redcrested pochard Netta rutins, 27) Common pochard 
Aythya ferina; 28) White-eyed pochard Aythya nyroca; 29) Baer's 
pochard Aythya baerr, 30) Tufted duck Aythya fuligula; 31 ) Scaup duck 
Aythya mania; 32) Cotton teal or quacky duck Nettapus 
coromandelianus; 33) Comb duck Sarkidiornis melanotos, 34) 
Whitewinged wood duck Cairina scutulata; 35) Longtailed or old 
squaw duck Clangula hyemalis; 36) Goldeneye duck Bucephala 
clangula; 37) Smew Mergus albellus; 38) Goosander, common 
merganser Mergus merganser, 39) Whiteheaded stifftailed duck 
Oxyura leucocephala 

4 4 4 

COSTLY GEESE : $ 5.3 MILLION AT J.F. KENNEDY 
AIRPORT. Courtesy, International Herald Tribune of 
11.11. 1998 ' 

The agency that operates John F. Kennedy International 
Airport will pay Air France $ 5.3 million to settle a lawsuit over 



damage done to a Concorde jet by a flock of geese that were 
sucked into its engines. 

Air France contended that the Port Authority of New York 
and New Jersey had failed to perform required "runway 
sweeps" to frighten birds away before every takeoff or landing 
of a Concorde flight. 

Air France said repairs to the plane after the 1995 landing 
took five days and cost more than $ 9 million. No one was 
injured. 

Neither the Port Authority nor the airline would discuss 
the matter, which was reported on Monday by The 
Star-Ledger of Newark, New Jersey. 

4 4 4 

23RD INTERNATIONAL ORNITHOLOGICAL CONGRESS 
TO BE HELD IN CHINA 11-17TH AUGUST 2002 

At the 22nd International Ornithological Congress held in 
Durban, South Africa, 16-23 August 1998, the International 
Ornithological Committee voted to accept the invitation from 
the Chinese ornithologists to host the 23rd International 
Ornithological Congress in Beijing, Cfiina on 11-17 August 
2002. Information can be obtained via e-mail 
■cinfocenter® ioc.org. en >, via the internet at 
<http://www.ioc.org.cn>, or via the home page of the 22nd 
congress at <http://www.ioc.org.za>, it will be possible to 
register and to submit abstracts via the internet. The following 
are contact addresses of people responsible for the 23rd 
Congress in Beijing. Professor Xu Weishu, 
Secretary-General of the 23rd Congress, Beijing Natural 
History Museum, 1-1-302, Beijing Science and Technology 
Commission Apt., Balizhuang, Haidian District, Beijing 
100037, CHINA. Phone & Fax: + 86-10-6846-5604; e-mail 
<s-g@ioc.org.cn>. The Honorable Liu Feng, Assistant 
Secretary-General of the 23rd Congress, China 
International Conference Center for Science and Technology, 
Xueyuan Nan Road, Beijing 100081, CHINA. Phone: 
+ 86-10-6217-4953; Fax: + 86-10-6218-0142; e-mail 
<liufeng@public.bta.net.cn>. Requests to be included on the 
mailing list for brochures and for information on the 23rd 
Congress should be sent to the Secretary-General or the 
Assistant Secretary-General of the 23rd Congress. Dr 
Fernando Spina, Chair, Scientific Program Committee, 
23rd Congress, Istituto Nazionale per la Fauna Selvatica, Via 
Ca' Fornacetta 9, 1-40064 Ozzano Emilia (BO), ITALY. 
Phone: + 39-51-65-12-111; Fax: + 39-51-79-66- 28; e-mail 
<infsioc@iperbole. bologna. it>. All inquiries about the 
scientific program of the 23rd congress, as well as comments 
and suggestions for the general program, plenary lectures, 
and symposia should be sent to him. Dr Walter J. Bock, 



Newsletter for Birdwatchers 



107 



President of the 23rd Congress, Department of Biological 
Sciences, Columbia University, 1200 Amsterdam Avenue, 
Mail Box 5521, New York, NY 10027-7004, USA. Phone: 
+ 1-212-854-4487; Fax: 1-212-865-8246; e-mail 
<wb4@columbia.edu>. General questions and comments 
should be sent to him. Dr Dominique G. Homberger, 
Secretary of the International Ornithological Committee, 
Department of Biological Sciences, 508 Life Sciences 
Building, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, 
LA 70803-1715, USA. Phone: + 1-504-388-1747; Fax: 
+ 1-504-388-2597; e-mail <zodhomb@lsu.edu>. Inquiries 
about the International Ornithological Committee should be 
sent to her. 



4 4 4 



C 



REVIEW 



3 



COMMUNITIES & CONSERVATION 

Edited by : Ashish Kothari and others, Published by : Sage 
Publications, New Delhi, SOS pages. Price : Rs 495/- (cloth), Rs 
325/- (paper) 

In 1967 I attended the First International Short Course on 
Management of National Parks and Equivalent Reserves, 
organised by the IUCN and the University of Wisconsin in the 
USA. We had a splendid time for 6 weeks visiting some of the 
grandest natural areas of the world, and attended lectures by 
the leaders of the emerging conservation movement. Much' 
emphasis was laid on the fragility of nature. In one park a 
machine was demonstrated which simulated the impact of 
human feet on the soil to impress upon us the importance of 
treading lightly on the earth. At the same time the Course 
emphasised that with proper planning thousands of visitors 
could enjoy the scenery and wildlife of the park and "yet leave 
them unimpaired for the enjoyment of future generations." 

In the Grand Teton National Park in the Rockies 6000 
people can be accommodated in the night. The Principle of 
Built-in Friction enunciated by Sir Frank Fraser Darling was 
put to good use. 99% of the people prefer to sit in their cars 
and watch the scene around them. Only 1% want to walk in 
the wilderness. A good hard-topped road prevents erosion 
and at the same time prevents people from spoiling the 
wilderness by entering it. 

But in this Course, 30 years ago, we learnt very little about 
the problems of dealing with residents within the Park. 
Wilderness had to be cleansed of humanity and parks had to 
consist only of unimpaired natural habitat and their denizens. 
These conservation ideas proliferated rapidly and widely 
through the two major organisations concerned with the 



saving of the natural world — the World Wildlife Fund and the 
IUCN, now known as the World Conservation Union. While 
many scientific projects were initiated to study the ecology of 
wild animals, the population dynamics of predators and prey, 
the vital importance of separate ecological niches for different 
species of life, a major problem in India and other countries 
on the role of tribals and resident populations in areas recently 
designated as sanctuaries and national parks was not 
considered at all. Obviously this was a serious shortcoming 
and it is only now that the problems of people within parks is 
recognised as one of the most serious constraints from the 
ecological point of view. 

In the Survey of Environment 1998 published by The 
Hindu newspaper, Madhav Gadgil has an interesting point to 
make. He denigrates the elitist genesis of the conservation 
movement in India. He refers to a meeting in Bangalore in the 
early 70s where there was a discussion about the monkey 
menace in our cities, and also to the destruction of crops in 
rural areas by elephants. With regard to the monkeys it was 
thought necessary to deport them out of bounds of the city so 
that the citizens should not be troubled. But with regard to the 
elephants the villagers needed to be educated about the value 
of wildlife. Over the years this favouritism for city dwellers is 
slowly diminishing but there is no doubt that the burden of 
wildlife protection falls heavily on the rural population. 

In the book under review we have a very complete 
discussion about the problems of humanity in our natural 
areas. We are also informed about the agelong ecological 
wisdom of tribals and local residents and the importance of 
taking their interests into account when producing 
management plans for our sanctuaries. 

The book consists of 4 parts. In the Introduction the issue 
and prospects of community based conservation and the 
diversity and sustainability of community based conservation 
are discussed. In Part 2 there is a discussion about the 
problems in other countries including the Maldives, Mongolia, 
Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. In Part 3 the emerging issues 
as a result of the worldwide movement for empowering local 
people, and protecting the rights of communities are 
discussed by various experts. In Part 4 there are case studies 
relating to some of the natural areas of India such as the 
Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve, Biligiri Rangaswamy Temple 
Sanctuary, Chinnar Sanctuary, Kailadevi and Dalma 
Sanctuaries and others. 

This is a book which will undoubtedly play a significant 
part in the future conservation movement of our country. 

Zafar Futehally 



VVi 



\ r 



ETLANDS 



INTERNATIONAL 



Please participate in the Asian 
Mid-winter Waterfowl Census : 

9th - 24th January 1999 



Contact your Regional 

Coordinator for further details 

and count forms 



Newsletter Calling 



Enrol A Friend : If every Newsletter Member could enrol just 
one new member our effectiveness would be doubled 
immediately) 

Will you help T : Please give copies of the membership forms 
to your friends and urge them to join. s 

Please renew your membership: If you have not yet renewed 
your membership please do so by paying Rs. 60/- (Rupees Sixty) 
for one year or Rs. 160/- (Rs. One Hundred and Sixty) for three 
years. Please add Rs. 15/- as bank collection charges if you are 
paying by cheque or draft. 



Editor 




Front Cover : Male Painted Snipe {Rostratula bengalensis) approaching nest. This wetland bird is more closely related to jacanas than the 
true snipes and exhibits strongly developed sexual dimorphism. Builds its nest among emergent vegetation in swamps, marshes, and over- 
grown paddy fields. The brighter female is polyandrous and may lay several clutches, each for a different male. Nest building, incubation and 
chick rearing tasks are exclusive to the male snipe. Photo : M. Venkataswamappa & R.S. Suresh. 

Back Cover : Male Indian Shama {Copsychus malabaricus). This magnificient song bird frequents well wooded forest tracks, bamboo facies, 
hill-stations and deciduous foothills forest. Lucidly sings with several rich fluty melodious notes altered with long pauses. The shama builds 
its nest in the hollows of trees and bamboo during May-June. Photo : M. Venkataswamappa & R.S. Suresh. 

Editor: ZAFAR FUTEHALLY, No. 2205, Oakwood Apartments, Jakkasandra Layout, Koramangala 3rd Block, 8th Main, Bangalore - 560 034, 
Kamataka, India, Printetf-end Published Bi-monthly by S. Sridhar at Navbharath Enterprises, Seshadripuram, Bangalore 560 020, India, 
Ph. : 336 4142 / 336 4682. Email : <navbarat@blr.vsnl.net,in>. For Private Circulation Only. 



-