moderately large scale, as in the wind channels used for aeronautical purposes. I am therefore desirous of bringing before you some observations that I have recently made with very simple apparatus.
When liquid flows from one reservoir to another through a channel in which there is a contracted place, we can compare what we may call the head or driving pressure, i.e. the difference of the pressures in the two reservoirs, with the suction, i.e. the difference between the pressure in the recipient vessel and that lesser pressure to be found at the narrow place. The ratio of head to suction is a purely numerical quantity, and according to the principle of similarity it should for a given channel remain unchanged, provided the velocity be taken proportional to the kinematic viscosity of the fluid. The use of the same material channel throughout has the advantage that no question can arise as to geometrical similarity, which in principle should extend to any roughnesses upon the surface, while the necessary changes of velocity are easily attained by altering the head and those of viscosity by altering the temperature.
The apparatus consisted of two aspirator bottles (fig. 10) containing water and connected below bŁ a passage bored in a cylinder of lead, 7 cm.
long, fitted water-tight with rubber corks. The form of channel actually employed is shown in fig. 11. On the up-stream side it contracts pretty suddenly from full bore (8 mm.) to the narrowest place, where the diameter is 275 mm. On the down-stream side the expansion takes place in four or five steps, corresponding to the drills available. It had at first been intended to use a smooth curve, but preliminary trials showed fchat this was unnecessary, and the expansion by steps has the advantage of bringing before the mind the dragging action of the jets upon the thin layers of fluid the rule that these critical velocities should be inversely proportional to the diameters of the spheres, a conclusion in pretty good agreement with M. Eiffel's observations*. But the principle is at least equally important in effecting a comparison between different fluids. If we know what happens on a certain scale and at a certain velocity in water, we can infer what will happen in air on any other scale, provided the velocity is chosen suitably. It is assumed here that the compressibility of the air does not come into account, an assumption which is admissible so long as the velocities are small in comparison with that of sound.