The Probability Density Operator for the K- G Equation P.S.C. Bruskiewich Mathematical-physics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Dr. Maurice Pryce Quantum-Physics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC This paper was written in 1982 with the kind assistance of Dr. Maurice Pryce of UBC but never published. The well - aged manuscript remained lost in the author's papers for thirty years, until recently rediscovered. 1.0 The Non-Relativistic Free Particle Equation The non-relativistic Schrodinger equation for a single particle with no external forces acting on it is derived from the Mass - Energy expression in the classical limit, 772 2 2, 24 L = p c +m Q c 1.1 where we can separate out the rest energy and the kinetic energy of the particle, namely E p =+m c .11 + f 2 \ P 2 2 K m c j m c f 2 f 2 W P \rn\c 1 )) 1.2 = E +E rest energy Kinetic Energy The classical portion of the mass-energy expression is the kinetic energy term, and so let us focus on that term K Kinetic Energy ,«•» 13 By replacing the c-operators by the q-operators [1] E -^ih — dt p->-iftV 1.4 where V is the gradient operator in the coordinate system the particle motion is being described (Euclidean, non-Euclidean, cylindrical, spherical, hyperbolic, elliptic, etc), the use of the q-operators yields the non-relativistic Schrodinger equation for a free particle, in — y/ = V y/ 2.., 1.5 dt ' 2m where the quantum state function y/ is some function of the position and kinematics of the particle and is non-relativistic. [2] The standard interpretation of the state function y/ is an interpretation first proposed by Max Born and is that the state function is Hermitian, and the probability of the state function is given by the square of its amplitude, (y/* denotes the complex conjugate of the state function y/ ) namely p = y/ y/ i- 6 For a free particle, since the particle is not being affected by external forces, when we integrate the probability of the state over all space we arrive at a constant value, namely j pdV = j y/*y/dV = constant All Space All Space 1.7 2.0 The Quantum Conservation of Current Take the partial differential in time of the probability operator, ( \ [ y/*y/dV ^All Space = ^ dt = I All Space f d_ dt ¥ \ J r a \ \ ¥ + ¥ d ¥ J 1 I V in J A11 ' v y All Spa * v> 2m \dt j ¥ + ¥* J dV 2.1 ( tf „ 2 ^ V 2m V> dV r ifi 2m = v: J (^(vV)-(vV»^ V-"-/ All Space V 2m y All Space Collecting all the terms within the integral and expressing the integrand as an expectation value we find I All Space — /?+vq dt H V 2m j ( ¥ *(V ¥ )-(V ¥ *) ¥ ) >dV = 22 We define a probability current operator j , such that J = ( ih\ v 2m J {yf\Vy,)-{Vy,*)y, 2.3 The classical conservation of current law carries over to a quantum conservation of current law, provided we view the expression within the integrand as an expectation function, which is meaningful only when is integrated over all space, namely d_ dt p + VUj =0 2.4 With regards to the probability current, if the state function y/ does not have a complex dependence on the space variable, then it has no current associated with it. Consider as examples the state functions e ±,kx and cos(fcc). It is evident that e ±,kx are traveling wave state functions. Choose the state function y/ cc e ilex J = ifi 2m (2ik) = f fik^ = v \m ) 2.5 which is a current in the positive v direction. Similarly for the conjugate state function y/ cc e -ikx ih 2m (-2ik) = V m ) -v 2.6 It is evident then that cos (Ax) represents a stationary state made up of two equally weighted e ±,kx state functions traveling in opposite directions, namely 1 cos(kx) = -(e lkx +e lkx ) For such a stationary state function as cos(kx) , since k ■■ n v h J 2.7 v , the two opposite traveling waves, which represent currents traveling in opposite directions, sum to zero. 3.0 The Probability Density for the K- G Equation The simplest relativist wave equation is derived by taking the relativistic Energy- Momentum equation, but retain both the rest energy and kinetic energy terms, namely 2 , 2 2 = p +m c once again replacing the c-operators by the q-operators, we find 3.1 2 o2 r d ■2^72 2 2. 3.2 c 2 dr y/ = -HVy/ + mcy/ Notice that unlike the non-relativistic case which is first order in time, the relativistic Klein - Gordon equation is second order in time. Let us retain the form of the probability current operator j , such (-— 1 v 2m J J K-G (v m (vv)-(vv m )v) 3.4 By dimensional analysis across the equivalent sign, this means then that the density function p for the K - G equation must be first order in time, since the q-operator for Energy is to first order in time. Without loss of generality let us consider a candidate density function Z f Z = A f ¥ V v d_ dt f ¥ d A } dt ¥ ¥ yui j + B(y/*y/)t + Cy/*y/ 3.5 We find then that d —Z = A dt ( *2 \ ¥ \ d dt ¥ ( *2 \ yvi J d dt ¥ ¥ + B(y/*ys), since 3.6 — r dt- (^V) = 0^C = 0&B— (y/*y/) — r dt- t = 3.7 where B is some function of the rest mass of the particle. Consider a candidate density function Z to be made up of two densities p + and p_ such that Z = P + +P-=P 3.8 By inspection P + ~- ifi ( Imc 2 K * d } . dt J imc * + y/y/t n and P-~- ifi 2mc (d * > imc 2 * Mf lift yj y/i n 3.9 3.10 When the two terms to Z are added together the probability density becomes P = P + +P ifi 2mc ¥ (d \ fd V dt ¥ J V dt ¥ \ J ¥ 3.11 It is interesting to note that the terms in the probability density function linear in time sum to zero. This makes sense given the quantum conservation of current law is an expectation function. 4.0 Implications of Probability Density on Positive Definiteness Since the initial conditions, the state function y/ and — y/ , can be arbitrarily prescribed, dt the probability density for the K -G equation outlined in 3.11 may assume negative as d well as positive values. Likewise, since the state function yr and — y/ are also dt functions of the spatial coordinates it is evident that the probability density for the K -G equation may assume positive values in some regions and negative values in other regions. In essence there is a loss of positive definiteness in the probability density for the K -G equation. In a one particular model, a negative probability density is inherent to the K - G equation and does not depend on the choice of the current density function j K _ c . As a result of this inherent short coming, the Klein - the Gordon equation is not a good candidate for a single particle relativistic equation. The K -G equation can be used in a field theory for particles with spin 0. Acknowledgement The author would like to thank Dr. Maurice Pryce of the Department of Physics at the University of British Columbia for his kind and thoughtful comments on this paper. When Dr. Pryce realized that I had never read the 1926 paper by Paul Dirac titled The Fundamental Equations of Quantum Mechanics, nor any of the original papers written by Bohr, Schrodinger, Heisenberg and Dirac, Dr. Pryce gave me a copy of the book "Sources of Quantum Mechanics" as a personal gift. It was Maurice Pryce's belief that to truly understand the Foundations and the thought process of the intellectuals who developed a subject as rich and sublime as quantum mechanics, one needs to read the original papers. {see recent author's notes below) Notes: [1] The designation c-operator for classical operator and q-operator for quantum operator was a designation first proposed by Paul Dirac. [2] The quantum rules were first presented in a consistent fashion by in a 1926 paper by Paul Dirac. see Paul Dirac, The Fundamental Equations of Quantum Mechanics or his book on Quantum Mechanics. References: Paul Dirac, The Fundamental Equations of Quantum Mechanics, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 109 (1926), 642-653 Author's Recent Notes: This paper was written in 1982 with the kind assistance of Dr. Maurice Pryce ofUBC. The well aged manuscript, which was never published, remained lost in the author 's papers for thirty years, until recently rediscovered in an old box with other manuscripts. The manuscript was transcribed and posted to archive.org. As part of his scientific career Dr. Pryce did service for the Royal Navy and Admiralty Research. The writer first met Dr. Pryce in 1981 when the author was a young man serving as a Naval Reserve Officer in the Canada 's Navy and an undergraduate physics student at UBC. Over several years, before his death in 2003, the author periodically had a chance to talk physics with Dr. Pryce. Maurice joined the Department of Physics at UBC in 1968. He had a reputation of being rather precise in his thinking and not suffering fools and foolishness quietly. The author is proud to say that he never was on the receiving end of any sharp words from Dr. Pryce. In 1985 the author would arrange for Dr. Pryce to write his "Recollections of Paul Dime", which was published in the journal of the UBC Physics Society and is now available at archive.org. Manuscripts were written and notes kept of the Pryce-Bruskiewich conversations and they may be posted to archive.org in the near future. This paper, the Probability Density Operator of the K - the G Equation, is the second time any of these notes or manuscripts have appeared in print In the measure of connections to Paul Dirac, Maurice Pryce is an Dirac-Alpha-Measure and the author is a Dirac-Beta-Measure, having written a paper with the kind and thoughtful comments of a physicist, who himself was a pupil of and worked with Paul Dirac. Maurice Pryce was one of Dr. Paul Dirac 's finest student. © 2012 Patrick Bruskiewich