(logo)
(navigation image)
Home American Libraries | Canadian Libraries | Universal Library | Open Source Books | Project Gutenberg | Biodiversity Heritage Library | Children's Library | Additional Collections

Search: Advanced Search

Anonymous User (login or join us)Upload
See other formats

Full text of "Wilderness v. Walking alternate beginning - Essay"

Blood 1 
Guye Blood 
Dr. Hepworth 
English 101-09 
13 November 2008 

The Wilderness v. Walking 

What is the thesis of Walking? What is the Thesis of the Wilderness Letter? Are the 
authors asking a guestion or making a statement? Were the authors influential during their 
lifetimes? Both Thoreau and Stegner are passionate authors of different times and a different 
era, but each has an adoring kinship for the wilderness and advocate for its preservation. 

In 1851 Henry David Thoreau delivered a lecture entitled Walking that was later published, 
after his death, in the Atlantic Monthly in 1862. In 1960 Wallace Stegner wrote a letter to David 
E. Pesonen of the Wildland Research Center entitled The Wilderness ; that letter was later 
published in his book The Sounds of Mountain Water. 

One has to wonder if Stegner and Thoreau came from the same cloth. Each had an 
appreciation for the value and sanctity of the wilderness. B oth showed a respect for its 
boundaries, unlike the common man surrounded by the wild at civilization's edge -- hurrying 
about his daily tasks of destroying one to build another -- who never stopped long enough to 
ponder its destruction. Thoreau writes of his distress concerning the destruction of the wild: 
from surveying property owners ascribed in their deeds, to home builders destroying the forests 
that surrounded town, choking off and polluting his access to his freedom and absolute need to 
walk unobstructed in any direction. Stegner, 100 years later, lives in a society already 
encroached upon by Thoreau' s distresses. He too argues for the preservation of the last of the 
Wilderness -- if for no other reason than just to know the Wilderness exists for the renewal of his 
sanity, health and spirituality. 



Blood 2 
The similarities go on and on, but the differences in their styles are evident as well. 
Thoreau lives in more rugged times and is hardened by the wild, as he alludes to in his published 
lecture: man and farm animal can be tamed to civilization, but in each are still wild oats to be 
sown. Thoreau prefers returning to the wild with a walk, to sitting in civilization's soft cushion. 
Stegner, less hostile toward civilization, still makes the point that society will lose its freedoms 
and its retreat from its very own pollutants if we continuously encroach upon, and destroy, the 
Wilderness. He eguates the death of the Wilderness with a death in us: "...as the remnants of the 
unspoiled and natural world are progressively eroded, every such loss, is a little death in me. In 
us" (Stegner). 

Each author is different in their styles, times and eras, yet both champion for the 
preservation of not only a geographical place, but a realm of self-renewal. Further, they seek a 
place where we can return to the wild- peace in each of us, a status symbol of our freedoms and 
what it means to be an American -- a place that can only be described as the Wilderness. 



Blood 3 
Works Cited 
Stegner, Wallace. "Wilderness Letter." The Wilderness Society . 3 Dec. 1960. Accessed 17 Sept. 

2008 <http://www.wilderness.org/ourissues/wilderness/wildernessletter.cfm>. 
Thoreau, Henry D. "Walking." Transcendentalists . 1862. Accessed 29 Sept. 2008 
<http://www.transcendentalists.com/walking.htm>.