(navigation image)
Home American Libraries | Canadian Libraries | Universal Library | Community Texts | Project Gutenberg | Children's Library | Biodiversity Heritage Library | Additional Collections
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload
See other formats

Full text of "A Concordance of Words and Phrases Construed in the Judicial Reports, and of ..."

Google 



This is a digital copy of a book that was preserved for generations on library shelves before it was carefully scanned by Google as part of a project 

to make the world's books discoverable online. 

It has survived long enough for the copyright to expire and the book to enter the public domain. A public domain book is one that was never subject 

to copyright or whose legal copyright term has expired. Whether a book is in the public domain may vary country to country. Public domain books 

are our gateways to the past, representing a wealth of history, culture and knowledge that's often difficult to discover. 

Marks, notations and other maiginalia present in the original volume will appear in this file - a reminder of this book's long journey from the 

publisher to a library and finally to you. 

Usage guidelines 

Google is proud to partner with libraries to digitize public domain materials and make them widely accessible. Public domain books belong to the 
public and we are merely their custodians. Nevertheless, this work is expensive, so in order to keep providing tliis resource, we liave taken steps to 
prevent abuse by commercial parties, including placing technical restrictions on automated querying. 
We also ask that you: 

+ Make non-commercial use of the files We designed Google Book Search for use by individuals, and we request that you use these files for 
personal, non-commercial purposes. 

+ Refrain fivm automated querying Do not send automated queries of any sort to Google's system: If you are conducting research on machine 
translation, optical character recognition or other areas where access to a large amount of text is helpful, please contact us. We encourage the 
use of public domain materials for these purposes and may be able to help. 

+ Maintain attributionTht GoogXt "watermark" you see on each file is essential for in forming people about this project and helping them find 
additional materials through Google Book Search. Please do not remove it. 

+ Keep it legal Whatever your use, remember that you are responsible for ensuring that what you are doing is legal. Do not assume that just 
because we believe a book is in the public domain for users in the United States, that the work is also in the public domain for users in other 
countries. Whether a book is still in copyright varies from country to country, and we can't offer guidance on whether any specific use of 
any specific book is allowed. Please do not assume that a book's appearance in Google Book Search means it can be used in any manner 
anywhere in the world. Copyright infringement liabili^ can be quite severe. 

About Google Book Search 

Google's mission is to organize the world's information and to make it universally accessible and useful. Google Book Search helps readers 
discover the world's books while helping authors and publishers reach new audiences. You can search through the full text of this book on the web 

at |http: //books .google .com/I 



A CONCORDANCE 



^Mc 




OP 




WORDS AND 




CONSTRUED IN THE 



JUDICIAL REPORTS, 



AND OF 



LEGAL DEFINITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 



By JOHN D. LAWSON, 

Author »f "Usages and Custems,"^**£iading Casts Simflifitd," 

" Contracts of Carriers," Eto. 



ST. LOUIS: 
F. H. THOMAS & COMPANY. 

1883. 



Entered aooordlng to Act of Oongrees, in the year 188S, by 

JOHN D. LAWSON, 
In the Office of the Librarian of Oongreea, at Waabington. 



8t, Louis: 
Press qf Nixonn' Jones PrinHnff Cbu 



PREFACE. 



This volume is an attempt to collect the adjudged cases m the 
reports of the United States (State and Federal), Great Britain, 
and the Colonies, in which Words and Phrases have been construed 
and Definitions of Legal Terms have been made or approved. Every- 
one who has examined the subject must have noticed how rare a 
thing it is to find a volume of legal reports whose Index contains 
such a title as " Words and Phrases " or '* Definitions." Except in 
some score of the earlier volumes of the English Common Law 
Reports and the current reports of the English Incorporated 
Law Society, the reporters have, with a surprising unanimity, com- 
pletely neglected these important topics. It is even woi'se in the 
American Ilepoi*ts. Our reporters, down to within a very late 
period, apparently never thought of the expediency of incorporating 
such a title into their books, and until the last ten years, it was 
impossible to find a volume of American decisions in which a sepa- 
rate place was given to these important subjects. The digesters 
have followed the repoi^ters in this omission, and the result is that 
with the exception of the current reports of Massachusetts, New 
York, and a few other States, there is no key to the multitude of 
decisions in which Words and Phrases have been construed by the 
coui-ts of this country. 

In the legal dictionaries some slight attention has been incidentally 
paid to these topics. But the legal dictionaries are restricted to the 
definitions of legal terms ; and even where their authors have at- 
tempted to include Common Words which have been interpreted by 

( iii ) 



iv PREFACE. 



courts, they have not gone veiy far in this direction. As a stnkiiig- 
proof of this, I would point out that this Concordance cites no fewer 
than 30,205 cases (25,255 in the body of the work, and 4,950 in 
the Appendix), and that of these, at least 20,000 had never been 
brought together before in any work, their existence been ascer- 
tained by me only througli a page by page examination of several 
thousand volumes of legal reports. 

In adopting the form of a Concordance instead of that of a Dic- 
tionary, I have had two reasons. In the first place, had I attempted 
to give even the briefest reference to the construction of the word 
as given m each case cited, this book would have grown to four, or 
even five volumes,^ and could not have beeif published except at 
a greatly enhanced cost to the purchaser. Secondly, so short a 
digest of a case would not be satisfactory. The lawyer finding 
that there is a case construing a word whose interpretation he de- 
sires to obtain, will not be satisfied with a bare statement of the 
construction. For example, the question is, whether on a proper 
construction of a contract to pay the ' ' crew ! ' of a vessel a cei-tain 
amount of money, the officers of the boat are to be included. In 
my Concordance, turning to the title — Crew — he will find the 
cases in which this word has been judicially construed. If in the 
attempt to give a digest of each case I had extended this work to 
four or five volumes, he would have learned, in addition to this, that 
' ' Under a United States Statute punishing a revolt by a ' crew ' of 
a vessel, the officers are included." But this information would be 
hardly more satisfactory than the first. He would want the oiiginal 
report of the case, in order to find the reasons given by the Court 
for this construction, the arguments of the opposing counsel on the 
question, the connection of the words in the statute, etc. 
Therefore, whether using the Concordance on my plan or on 
a more extended plan, he would not rest until he had read the 
case in which this interpretation had been given to the word. My 



1 A little reflection will show the truth of this statement. To simply cite the 
ease requires not much less on an average than one line ; while to give any idea of 
the point decided in each case would require not less, and generally more than four 
lines. 



PREFACE. 



work gives the lawyer the adjudged cases m which AV^ords and 
Phrases have been construed, and this plan, in a day when the ob- 
ject of digesters and text-book writers is in the main to refer the 
searcher to precedents, will, I think, best accomplish this object. 

I make no claim to have discovered all the cases, nor do I im- 
agine that my book is complete. A work of this I'ind is nevf^r Jin- 
ished. It has been in press nearly a year, and during that time I 
have discovered nearly 5,000 cases, — some of them published since the 
manuscript went to the i)rinter, some of them old cases which I have 
since come across for the first time, — which cases I have fortunately 
been able to add in the Appendix. (Part III.) All I ask of the 
profession, is a recognition of the labor of several years which has re- 
sulted in bringing together in one volume over 30,000 decisions on 
this subject, most of which, on account of not bemg separately col- 
lected in either the index to the reports or in the digests, were almost 
. as inaccessible to the profession as though they had never been de- 
cided, and were hardly to be discovered, except by accident. This 
I do claim for my book ; no more, no less ; and on this I rest my 
hopes to have in some considerable degree lessened the labors of the 
noble profession of which I am proud to be a humble member. 

J. D. L. 

St. Louis, March, 1883. 



PAET I 



WORDS, PHRASES, AND DEFINITIONS 



(vii) 



WORDS. PHRASES AND DEFINITIONS. 



— bill of exohange. Thompson v, Wesleyan News Asso., 8 C. 
B. 849. 

— debtor. In statute. European R. Co. v. Westall, 6 R & S. 974. 

— new lease. Iggulden v. May, 7 East, 237. 

— promiflsory note. Thompson v, Wesleyan News Asso., 8 C. 
B. 849. 

renewed oontraot. In deed. Solvency Guaranty Co. v. Froane^ 



7 H. A N. 12. 

profit prendre. Manning v, Wardale, 5 Ad. & Ell. 764 ; Waters 

V. Lilley, 4 Pick. 145. 

ante. Allen v, McKeen, i Sumn. 308. 

anteoedentL Pattison t/. Robinson, 5 M. & S. 1 10. 

extra. Lint v, Holland, 14 Mass. 151. 

initio. In statute. Sackrider v, McDonald, 10 Johns. 253. 

In statute, Doyle v. Doyle, 26 Mo. 545 ; State v, Davis, 70 Mo. 467. 

and expose. In statute. Queen v. Falkingham, L. R., i C. C. 

222. 

Alexander v. Baltimore Ins. Co., 4 Cranch, 370 ; Holden v. Joy, 
17 Wall. 211; Jumel v. Marine Ins. Co., 7 Johns. 412; Bradlie v. 
Maryland Ins. Co., 12 Peters, 378; Kinsey z^. Kinsey, 37 Ala. 393; 
Richardson v. McNuIty, 24 Cal. 339 ; St. John v. Kidd, 26 Cal. 263 ; 
Judson V. Malloy, 40 Cal. 299 ; Smith z'. Cushing, 41 Cal. 97 ; McLeran 
V. Benton, 43 Cal. 469 ; Marquart v. Bradford, 43 Cal. 526 ; Stevens 
V. Town of Norfolk, 42 Conn. 383 ; Moore v. Stevenson, 27 Conn. 
14; Leveripg v. Levering, 16 Md. 213; Washburn v. Washburn, 9 
Cal. 475. 

In statute. Childs v. Childs, 49 Md. 509. 

of offloe. State v. Seay, 64 Mo. 89. 

ABBBSVIATIONS. Hunt v. Smith, 9 Kas. 153 ; Frowd v. Stillard, 4 C. & P. 51. 

In statute. Fulenwider v. Fulenwider, 53 Mo. 440. 

ABI>nOT. Carpenter v. People, 8 Barb. 603 ; People v. Parshall, 6 Parker C. C 

129 ; Com. V. Cook. 12 Mete. 93 ; State v. Ruhl, 8 Iowa, 447. 

ABET. U. S. V. Gooding, 12 Wheat. 460 ; People 2/. Woodward, 45 Cal. 293, 

In statute. Raiford v. State, 59 Ala. 106. 

Connaughty v. State, i Wis. 159; Green v. State, 13 Mo. 382. 

Lyle V. Richards, 9 S. & R. 367. 
ABIDE, In statute. Hodge v. Hodgdon, 8 Cush. 297. 

by. In bond. Shaw v. Hatch, 6 N. H. 162. 

decision. Hodges t'. Pingree, 108 Mass. 585. 

the award. In contract. Marshall v. Reed, 48 N. H. 36. 



ABILITY. 



ABSENTED. 



ABTTiTTY, 



ABLE. 
ABODB. 



ABOBTION. 



ABOUT. 



In statute. Lynde v. Barnard, i M. & W. loi. 

hftTing the to provide the Mme. In simiuie. Washbam «. 

Waahburn, 9 Cal. 475. 

In statuU. Hampden v, Newburgh, (q Me. 370. 

place of . In statutt. Reg. v. Deighton. 5 Q. B. S97; Queen v. 

Hammond, 17 Q. B. 772. 

Qsaal plaoe of . In statute, Earle v. McVeigh, i Otto, 503; 

Dunns' Appeal, 35 Conn. 83 ; Ser v, Bobst, 8 Mo. 506. 

Com. V. Bangs, 9 Mass. 387 ; Com. v, Jackson, 15 Gray, 187 ; Mills v. 
Com., 13 Pa. 8t 631 ; Com. v, Parker, 9 Mete. 263 ; Smith v. State, 
33 Me. 48 ; State t/. Cooper, 2 Zab. 53 ; Mitchell v. Com., 78 Ky. 
204; Abrams v. Foshee, 3 Clarke (la.), 274; Hatfield v. Gano, 
15 Iowa, 177 ; Evans v. People, 49 N. Y. 388 ; Crichton v. People, 6 
Parker C. C. 363. 

In contract. Cross v. Eglin, 2 B. & Ad. 106 ; Moore v. Campbell, fo 
Ex. 323 ; Bradley v. U. S., 6 Otto, 170. 

In deed. Shipp v. Miller, 2 Wheat. 316; Johnson t/. Pannel. 2 Wheat 
206; Sanders z'. Morrison, 2 T. B. Mon. 109(15 Am. Dec 140); 
Cutts V. King, 5 Me. 482 ; Bodley v. Taylor, 5 Cranch, 191. 

In will. Wheeler v, Randall, 6 Mete. 532. 

seven aoree. In deed. Goodyear v. Shanahan, 43 Conn. 205. 

to sail with cargo. In charter-party. Von Lingen v. David- 



son, 4 Fed. Rep. 346 ; i id. 178. 

adlaim of $160. In contract. Turner v. Whidden, 22 Me. 121 . 

on or . In contract. Hawes v, Lawrence, 4 N. Y. 345. 

in manner mentioned. In statute. Queen v. Humphrey, 10 

Ad. & Ell. 33S. 
AT^'ttrnftlH icni'i-. Story z^. Holcombe,4 McLean, 306; Folsom v. Marsh, 2 Story, 107. 



ABSCOND. 



In statute. Bennett v. Avant, 2 Sneed, 152; Ives v. Curtiss, 2 Root, 
133; Fitch V. Waite, 5 Conn. 117 ; House z/. Hamilton, 43 111. 185; 
Field V. Adreon, 7 Md. 209 ; Ware v, Todd, i Ala. 199 ; Boardman v. 
Bickford, 2 Aik. (Vt.) 345 ; Myers v. Farrell, 47 Miss. 281 ; Ross 
V. Clark, 32 Mo. 296 ; Hoggett «. Emerson, 8 Kas. 262 ; Re Proctor, 
27 Vt. 118. 

In statute. Lynde v. County, 16 Wall. 6 ; Queen v. Perkin, 7 Q. B. 

165 ; Ingraham v. Bowie, 33 Miss. 20 ; Phillips v, Phillips. L. R., i 

P. & D. 169 ; James v. Townshend, 104 Mass. 371. 
from the State. Milton v. Babson, 6 Allen, 324 ; Hallett v. Bas- 

sett, 100 Mass. 170. 

without leave. Hanson v. South Scituate, 1 1 5 Mass. 336. 



In statute, Bingham v. Cabbot, 3 Dall. 19 ; Wash v. Heard,,27 Miss. 400. 

debtor. In statute. Den v. Wharton, i Yerg. 124; Redfern v. 

Rumney, i Cranch, C. C. 300 ; Cochran v. Fitch, i Sandf. Ch. 142. 

defendants. In statutt. Curd v. Lecther, 3 J. J. Marsh. 445 ; 



ABSENTED. 



James v. Townshend, 104 Mass. 369. 

— from duty with leave. In statute. U. S. v. Williamson, 23 
Wall. 411. 

— from the State. In Constitution. State z^. Graham, 26 La. Ann. 568. 

— on public business. Gregg v. Matlock, 31 Ind. 373. 

— himself. In statute, Chariton Co. v, Moberly, 59 Mo. 339 ; Re 
Davison, 4 Fed. Rep. 507. 



ABSENTEE. 



ACCIDENT. 



ABSOLUTE. 



Emmerling v. Cucullu, i8 La. Ann. 695. 

Greenawmlt t/. Greenawalt, 71 Pa. St. 483. 

Ih insurance policy. Hough v. City Fire Ins. Co., 29 Conn. 10. 

inheritable title. In deed. Lincoln v, Lincoln, 107 Mass. 590. 

interest. In insurance policy. Hough v. City Fire Ins. Co., 29 

Conn. 10. 

— ownenhip. In statute. Converse v. Kellogg, 7 Barb. 590. 

purohase. Ridout v. Harris, 17 U. C. C. P. 88. 



ABSOLUTELY. In statute. Sayer v. Du&ur. 1 1 Q. E 335. 

entitled. In statute. Re Hobson, 7 Ch. Div. 709. 

incompatible. State v. Rover, 13 Nev. 17. 

due and not on any oontingenoy. In statute. Ware v. Gowen, 

65 Me. 534. 

vest • In will. Johnson v^ Johnson, 32 Ala. 637. 

Dickinson v. R. Co., 7 W. Va. 390. 
In certificate. Wilhite v. Barr, &; Mo. 284. 

of title. Banker v. Caldwell 3 Minn. 94. 

In indictment. Re Thompson, 6 Hurl, k N. 204. 

In statute. Dawkins v. State, 58 Ala. 377. 

and misuse. In statute. Baltimore v. Pittsbuigh, etc., R. Co., 

3 Pittsb. 2a 

such female in the attempt to have carnal knowledge of 



ABUSB. 



ABUT. 
ABU'ITJLNG. 



AOOSFTAirOS. 



AOCEFTED. 



AOCESSIOir. 



AOdDEHT. 



her. In statute. Dawkins v. State, 58 Ala. 376 (29 Am. Rep. 754). 

Winckworth v. Mayo, Cro. Jac. 184. 

In statute. Wakefield Bd. v. Lee, i Ex. Div. 336 ; Wakefield Bd. v. 
Mander, 5 C. P. Div. 248 ; Holt v. City Council, 127 Mass. 408. 

In statute. Snow v. Warner, 10 Mete. 132; Howe v. Palmer, 3 B. & 
Aid. 325. 

and receive. In statute. Rodgers v. Phillips, 40 N. Y. 519. 

Green v. Town of Canaan, 29 Conn. 157; State v. Dawson, 22 Ind. 

272 ; First Nat. Bk. v. Whitman, 94 U. S. 343 ; Reg. v. Cooke, 8 C. 

& P. 582 ; Reg. V. Rogers, 8 C. & P. 629 ; State v. Morton, 27 Vt. 

310. 

in aatiafbotion. Hardman v. Bellhouse, 9 M. & W. 596. 

waived. In note. Carson v. Russell, 26 Tex. 452. 

actual . Valle v. Cerre, 36 Mo. 575. 

day of • In note. Sutton v. Toomer, 7 B. & C. 418. 

In bill. Hatch t/. Antrim, 51 III. 106. 

the office. In affidavit. Queen v. Slatter, 1 1 Ad. & Ell . 506. 

place to which the public have . In statute. Hirst v. Moles- 
bury, L. R., 6 Q. B. 130. 

Lampton v. Preston, i J. J. Marsh. 454 (19 Am. Dec. 104). 

Harrel v. State, 39 Miss. 702 ; Gipps v. Gipps. 1 1 H. L. Cas. i ; U. S. 
V. Wilson, Bald. 78 ; U. S. v. Libby, i Woodb. & M. 221. 

In indictment, Holloway v. Queen, 17 Q. B. 317. 

Chase v. Barrett, 4 Paige, 148 ; Jones v. Woodhull, i Root, 298 ; Brown 
V. Elliott, 17 N. J. (Eq.) 353; Earl of Bath v. Sherwin, 10 Mod. 1 ; 
Crutchfield v. Richmond, etc., Co., 76 N. C. 320. 

In insurance policy. Schneider v. Provident Ins. Co., 24 Wis. 28 ; 



ACCIDENT. 4 ACCOUNT. 

A00n)£NT. — Continued. 

Mallory v. Travelers' Ins. Co., 47 N. Y. 5^ (7 Am. Rep. 410) ; North 
American Ins. Co. v. Burroughs, 69 Pa. St. 43 (8 Am. Rep. 212). 

InpUa. Lord Churchill v. Hunt, 2 R & Aid. 6S9. 

In statute, Langdon v, Bowen, 46 Vt. 512 ; Burbeck v. Little, 50 Tt 
713 ; Bobierv. Clay, 27 U. C. Q. B. 438 ; ex parte North, 49 Ala. 385. 

beyond his oontroL In contract. Fenwick v, Schmalz, L. R., 

3C. P. 313. 

' in a fbotory. In statute. Lakeman v. Stephenson, 9 B. & S. 57. 

of naTigation. In bill of lading, Clark v. Barnwell, 12 How. 272. 

or mistake. In statute, Lorings v. Marsh, 6 Wall. 337. 

of the sea. In bill of lading, Bazin v. Steamship Co., 3 Wall. 

Jr., 229. 

inevitable . The Morning Light, 2 Wall. 550 ; Brown v, Kendall, 

6 Cush. 292 . 

iojnry oaused by any . In insurance policy, Mallory v. Trav- 
elers' Ins. Co., 47 N. Y. 52. 

ACXHBENTAL. delays. In biU of lading, Lawrence t'. New York, etc., R. Co., 36 

Conn. 63. 

violent and means. In insurance policy. Southard v. Railway 

Pass. Ins. Co., 34 Conn. 574. 

AOCJLDlfilll TALLY, fire shall begin. In statute, Webb v, W. & O. R. R., 49 

N. Y. 420 ; Filliter v, Phippard, 1 1 Q. B. 348. 

A0GIDJUNT8. of the seas and navigation. In bill of lading, Clark v. Bam- 
well, 12 How- 272 ; Laurie v, Douglass, 15 M. & W. 746. 

unavoidable of fire. In bill of lading. Swindler v, Hilliard, 

2 Rich. 286. 

ACOOMMODATnfG. terms . In proposal. Rice i/. McLarren, 42 Me. 1 57. 

ACCOMMODATION. paper. Lenheim v, Wilmarding, SS Pa. St. 73. 

ACCOMPANIED. by. In statute, Reg. v, Mylor, 1 1 Q. B. 59. 

ACCOMPANY. Kingsbury's Case, 106 Mass. 226. 
ACCOMPUCK Cross v. People, 47 111. 152. 

In statute. Smith v. State, 37 Ala. 472 ; Bass v, SUte, 37 Ala. 469 ; 
Harrington v. State, 36 Ala, 236. 

ACCOBD. Kromer v, Heim, 75 N. Y. 574- 

and satisfttotion. Bull v. Bull, 43 Conn. 455 ; Pulliam v. Tay- 



lor, 50 Miss. 251. 
AOOOBDING. to law. In affidavit, McElhaney v. Gilleland, 30 Ala. 183. 

In plea, Fiser v. Mississippi, etc., R. Co., 32 Miss. 360. 

In will. Mclntyre «. Ramsey, 23 Pa. St. 317. 

to the conditions of. In bond, Stoddard v. Hart, 23 N. Y. 556. 

to the form of the statute. Doe v, Harrison, 3 B. & Ad. 765. 

to the statute. In plea. Fiser v. Mississippi, etc., R. Co., 32 

Miss. 360. 

In statute. Frost v. Williams, 7 Ad. & Ell. 773. 
A000X7NT. Glass Factory v. Reid, 5 Cow. 587 ; McWilliams v. Allan, 45 Mo. 573 ; 

Stringham v. Winnebago Co., 24 Wis. 594 ; Whitwell v. Willard, i 
Mete. 216. 

In statute, Hollister v. Hollister, 35 Conn. 241 ; Stringham v. Super- 
visors, 24 Wis. 594. 



ACCOUNT. 5 ACQUITTAL. 

ACOOUirr — continued. 

due firm. In partnership agreenunt, Burress v. Blair, 6i Mo. 

133. 
of his creditors. In statute. Spear v. Wardell, i N. Y. 144. 

stated. Spangler v. Springer, 22 Pa. St. 454 ; Stenton v. 



Jerome, 54 N. Y. 480 ; McLellan v, Croflon, 6 Me. 308 ; Hughes v^ 
Thorpe, 5 M. & W. 664. 

dosed . BassT/. Bass. 8 Pick. 191. 

just and true . Stebhins v, Niles, 25 Miss . 267 ; Kock «. Bonitz, 

4 Daly, 117 ; Lockwood v, Thorne, 11 N. Y. 170; Graves v. Pierce, 
53 Mo. 423; Heaman z/. Porter, 35 Mo. 137. 

long . In statute, Ross «. Mayor, 2 Abb. Pr. (N. S.) 266; Sharp 

«. Mayor, 9 Abb. Pr. 436; Dewey v. Field, 13 How. Pr. 437; 
Dickinson 0. Mitchell, 19 Abb. Pr. 286. 

on of his master. In statute. Queen 9. CuUum, L. R., 2 C. C. 

R. 29, 

ACOOUirrABUB. McPhillips v. McPhillips, 9 R. I. 536. 

In note, Furber «. Caverly, 42 N. H. ^^, 

receipt. In indictment. Com. t^. Lawless, loi Mass. 32. 

not fbr depreciation. In will, Breton «. Mockett, 9 Ch. 

Div. 95. 

AOOOmrrAlTF. Larchin «. Bank, L. R., 8 Ex. 80 ; 10 id. 64. 

AOOOUITTS. In statute, Whitwell v. Willard, i Mete. 216. 

all my . In will. Gale «. Drake, 51 N. H. 78. 

AOujftUJB. Mundt V. Sheboygan, etc., R. Co., 31 Wis. 451. 

oaose of action shall . In statute, Kennedy «. Burner, 36 Mo. 

128. 

AOGBUISD. Weber «. Harbor Commrs., 18 Wall. 57 ; Hartshorne «. Ross, 2 Disney, 

action shall have . In statute, Sohn «. Waterson, 17 Wall. 596. 

cause of action . In statute, Reppstein «. Ins. Co., 51 Mo. 481. 

ACCBUINa. debt . In statute. Hall v. Pritchett, 3 Q. B. Div, 215. 

ACCUSE. In statute. People v, Braman, 30 Mich. 460. 

ACCUSED. Rex «. McNaughten, 1 C. & K. 131. 

of dime. In statute. State t. South, 5 Rich. 489. 

ACCUSTOHED. to receive. In statute. Queen v. Mayor, 8 Ad . & Ell 182. 

way. In deed. Ferriss v. Enowles, 41 Conn. 308. 

ACKJNOWIJBDGE. In statute, Routledge t, Ramsay, 8 Ad. & Ell. 221. 

it as his own. In statute, Bailey «. Boyd, 59 Ind. 292. 

ACKJN OWIJBDGED. shall be by him. In statute. Baskin v, Baskin, 36 

N. Y. 416. 

ACKNOWUeDGMENT. Sidwell «. Mason, 2 H. & N. 308. 

ACQUAINTED. with the character and drcnmstances. In insurance policy. 

^tna Ins. Co. v. Tyler, 16 Wend. 385 (30 Am. Dec. 90). 

made with the contanta In statute, Bohan v. Casey, s Mo. 

App. 106. 

personally . In statute, Kelly v, Calhoun, 5 Otto, 712. 

ACQUIESCED. Allen «. McKeen, i Sumn. 276. 
ACQUTFTAI.. Lee «. State, 26 Ark. 260. 



ACQUITTANCE. 



ACTION. 



ACQu rrxANGE. In statute, Reg. «. Atkinson, 2 Moody, 278 ; Com. «. Ladd, 15 Mass. 

526 ; Reg. 9. French, L. R., i C. C. R 217: Clark «. Newsam, i Ex. 131 ; 
Reg. V. West, i Den. C. C. 258 ; State «. Shelters, 51 Vt. 102 (31 Am. 
Rep. 679). 

or receipt fbr money. In statute. Reg. «. French, L. R., i 

C. C. R. 217. 

Dollaway v. Turrill, 26 Wend. 383. 

Comstock V. Van Deusen, 5 Pick. 163. 

a oountry. In agreement. Evans v. Pratt, 3 M. & G. 759; 4Scott» 

N. R. 378. 

the land oonveyed. In deed. Brown «. Meady, 10 Me. 391 (2$ 



AOQUTTTSD. 
ACBOSS. 



AOT. 



AOTTEfQ. 



ACfnON. 



Am. Dec. 248). 
In statute. Coe v. Wise, 7 B. & S. 831. 

oomplained of. In statute. Haylock v. Sparke, i Ell. & Bl. 471. 

done. In lease. Doe «. Stevens, 3 R & Ad. 299. 

in his official capacity. In statute. Cumming «. Brown, 43 N. 

Y. 514. 

of the congress. U. S. v. Smith, 2 Mason, 143. 

or intention. In insurance policy. Chapman «. Republic Life 



Ins. Co., 6 Biss. 238. 

Everard «. Poppleton, 5 Q. B. 183 ; Queen v. Slatter, 11 Ad. & Ell. 506. 

in the trust. In will. Sharp «. Sharp, 2 B. & Aid. 415. 

on behalf of any other person. In statute. Re Clipperton, 12 

Q. R 688. 

Bridgton t. Bennett, 23 Me. 425 ; Overseers v. Beedle, i Barb. 1 1 ; 
Bank of Commerces. Rutland, etc., R. Ca, 10 How Pr. i ; Farring- 
ton «. Freeman, 2 Edw. 572 ; People v. Sage, 3 How. Pr. 56 ; Re 
Hunter, 6 Ohio, 499 ; Allen v. Partlow, 3 S. C. 417. 

In statute. David «. South Western R. Co., 41 Ga. 223 ; Didier v. 
Davison, 10 Paige's Ch. 515; Coatsworth v. Barr, 11 Mich. 199; 
Hart's Appeal, 32 Conn. 539 ; Mason v, Wirrall Highway, 4 Q. B. 
Div. 459 ; People f>. Sage. 3 How. Pr. 56 ; People «. Oswego County 
Ct., 2Thomp. & C. 431 ; Stiles's Appeal, 41 Conn. 329 ; Overseers v. 
Beedle, i Barb. 11 ; Valentine «. City of Boston, 20 Pick. 201 ; People 
«. County Judge, 1 3 How. Pr. 398 ; Malley «. Altman, 14 Wis. 24 ; 
Carlisle v. Whaley, L. R., 2 H. L. Cas. 391 ; Gibbons v. Goodrich, 
3 Bradwell^ 130. 

— at law. In statute. State «. Carr, 6 Oregon, 133 ; Smyth v. 
Ripley, 33 Conn. 306; State t. New Haven, etc., R Co., 41 Conn. 134. 

for an ipjiiry to person or oharaoter. In statute. Carter «. 

Smith, 23 Wis. 496; Wagner «. Lathers, 26 Wis. 437. 

fbr rent. In statute. Drew «. Fletcher, i B. & C. 283. 

fbnnded on oontraot. In statute. Bayliss v. Lintott, L. R., 8 



C. P. 345. 

in rem. Peters v. Dunnells, 5 Neb. 460. 

of debt. In statute. Miles v. Brough, 3 Q. B. 845. 

on the case. In statute. Sharp t>. Curtiss, 15 Conn. 526. 

or proceeding. In statute. McCausIand's Estate, 52 Cal. 568. 

oaiise of . In statute. Borst «. Corey, 1 5 N. Y. 505. 



oivU 



In statute. Kramer «. Redman, 9 Iowa, 1 14 ; Corson «. 



Ball, 47 Barb. 452 ; Bank of* Commerce ». Rutland, etc., R. Co., 10 



ACTION. 7 ACTUAL. 

ACTION -7 Continued. 

How. Pr. I ; Quick «. Keeler, 2 Sandf. 231 ; Backus v. Stilwell, 3 
How. Pr. 318; Myers «. Rosback, 4 How. Pr. 83; Peoples. Cook, 
8 N. Y. 67 ; Lang «. Ropke. i Duer, 701 ; Mills v. Thursby, 2 Abb. 
Pr. 432. 

■nit or . In statute, Moore «. Cooley, 2 Hill, 412; McDonalds. 

Bank, 2 How. Pr. 35 ; Overseers v, Beedle, 1 Barb. 11. 

suit or of a civil nature. Hildreth v. Hopewell, 13 N. J. (L.) 5. 

ACfinOlTB. In statute. Waltermire «. Westover, 14 N. Y. 16; McBride's Appeal, 

72 Pa. St. 480 ; Webster €. Commrs., 63 Me. 27. 

and auitB. In statute, Guthrie «. Fisk, 3 B. & C. 184. 

at law on oontraot. In statute. Marsh «. Fruser, 27 Wis. 596. 

on the oaae. In statute, McCluny «. Silliman, 3 Peters, 270. 

respecting eaaementa on real estate. In statute, Cary v, 

Daniels, 5 Mete. 236. 

all upon any judgment. In statute, Jackson v. Everett, 

I R & S. 862. 

civil . In statute. Green v, U. S., 9 Wall. 655. 

ACfFS. In lease, Spencer «. Marriott, i B. & C. 459. 

ACfTUAIi. State «. Wells, 31 Conn. 210. 

In statute, Stevens v. Irwin, 15 Cal. 506. 

and oontinued change of possession. In statute, Brunswick 

«. McClay, 7 Neb. 137. 

arrival in dock. In statute, Atwood v. Case, i Q. B. Div. 134. 

bias. In statute. People «. Duck, 37 Cal. 277. 

cash payment. In statute, Hogg v, Orgill, 34 Pa. St. 344; 

Haggerty v, Foster, 103 Mass. 17. 

cash value. In insurance policy. Mack 9. Lancashire Ins. Co., 
4 Fed. Rep. 59. 

— change of possession. In statute. Grant v. Lewis, 14 Wis. 491. 

— cost. In statute, Alfonso «. U. S., 2 Story, 421 ; U. S. v. Sixteen 
Packages, 2 Mason, 48; Lexington, etc., R. Co. v, R. Co., 9 
Gray, 226. 

— determination. In statute, McMahon «. Rauhr, 47 N. Y. 67; 
Caughey «. Smith, 47 N. Y. 244 ; Frank «. Benner, 3 Daly, 422 ; 
Wilkins «. Earle, 46 N. Y. 358 ; 42 How. Pr. 255. 

market value. In statute. Cases of Champagne, i Ben. 241 ; 2 



Ben. 249. 

military servioe. In statute. Van Denser v, Gordon, 39 Vt 1 1 1. 

notice. Jordan v. Pollock, 14 Ga. 145. 

In statute, Vaughn v. Tracy, 22 Mo. 415. 

occupation. In statute. Peoples. Ambrecht, 11 Abb. Pr. 97 ; 

Ewing «. Burnet, 11 Pet. 41 ; Watkins v. Holman, 16 Pet. 25 ; Flem- 
ing 9. Maddox, 30 Iowa, 239; Cleveland t, Crawford, 14 N. Y. S. C. 
616. 

ouster. Burns v, Byrne, 45 It>wa, 285. 

payment. In statute, Haviland v. Chase, 39 Barb. 283; Hogg 

«. Orgill, 34 Pa. St . 344. 

place of abode. In statute, Tripp «. Brown, 9 R. I. 240. 

possession. In statute, Fleming «. Maddox, 30 Iowa, 239 ; 



ACTUAL. 8 ADJOINING* 

AOTUAIi — Continued. 

Churchill «. Onderdonk, 59 N. Y. 134 ; Cleveland v, Crawford, 14 
N. Y. S. C. 616; Webster f>. Overseers, L. R., 8 C. P. 281 ; id. 306. 

residenoe. JnstatuU. Wharton «. Bunting, 73 111. 16. 

sales. In statuU, Miles v. Miller, 5 Neb. 269. 

BOisare. In statute. Gladstone «. Padwick, L. R., 6 Ex. 205. 

violenoe. In statute. State 9. Wells, 31 Conn. 210. 

▲OTHAIiLY. eqjoyed. In statute. Flight v. Thomas. 11 Ad & £11. 688; 8 

CI. & F. 231. 

— J delivered in ezeoation. In statute. Re Duke of Newcastle^ 
L. R., 8 Eq. Cas. 700. 

oooupied. In statute. King «. Inhabitants, eta, 4 Ad. & Ell. 497 ; 

id. 613 ; Queen «. Same, 9 Ad. & Ell. 626 ; Com. v. Dean, i Pick. 387. 

receive. In stcUute. Calkins «. Lock wood, 17 Conn. .174; 

Hanson «. Armitage, 5 B. & Aid. 558 ; Evan v. Dunfield, i Q. 
B. 303. 

received. In will. Martin «. Martin, L. R., 2 Eq. 404 ; Johnsons. 



Crook, 12 Ch. Div. 639. 

ADDITION. erected to a fbrmer building. Whitenack «. Noe, 11 N. J. 

Eq. 321 ; Updike «. Skillman, 27 N. J. Law, 131. 

erected to a building. In statute. Updike «. Skillman, 27 N. 

J. (Law) 131 ; Whitenack «. Noe. 11 N. J. (Eq.) 413. 

of building. In deed. Atkins 9. Bordman, 2 Mete 457. 



in to. In order of court, Walter t. McSherry, 21 Mo. 76. 

ADDinOHAIi. security. In statute. State v. Hull, 53 Miss. 626. 

ADEMPTION. Langdon v. Astor, 16 N. Y. 9 ; Beck v. McGillis, 9 Barb. 35 ; Ford v. 

Ford, 23 N. H. 212; White v. Winchester, 6 Pick. 48 ; Clendening 
«. Clymer, 17 Ind. 155 ; Weston v. Johnson, 48 Ind. i. 

ADEQITATB. and sufficient load. In statute. Directors v. Gidlow, L. R, 7 

H, L.517. 

crossing. In deed. Gtbj v. Burlington, etc., R. Co., 37 lowa^ 

119. 

ADHEBING. In constitution. U. S. v. Greathouse, 2 Abb. U. S. 365. 

ADJAOENT. People t. Schermerhorn, 19 Barb. 540; Peverelly «. People, 3 Park. C. 

C.59. 
In statute. Henderson «. Long, i Cooke, 128 ; Re Municipality, 7 La. 
Ann. 76 ; Reg. «, Brown, 17 Q. B. 839. 

owner. In statute. Mayor of New York v. Hart, 16 Hun, 380. 

ADJOININQ. In statute. Moody «. Corbett, 5 B. & S. 879 ; Walton v. R. Co., 67 

Mo. 56 ; Peverelly «. People, 3 Park. C. C. 59 ; Truax v. Pool, 46 
Iowa, 256; Rex v. Hodges, Moody k M. 341; Wakefield Co. o. 
Mander, 5 C. P. Div. 248 ; Wakefield Bd. «. Lee, i Ex. Div. 336. 

land. In statute. Balch v. Commrs., 3 Mete 327. 

or appurtenant thereto. In statute. Com. «. Curley, loi Mass. 

24. 

owner. In statute. Directors v. Blackmore, L. R., 4 H. L. 6io» 

property. In deed. Harrison t>. Good, L. R., 1 1 Eq. Cas. 338. 

to or occupied with a dwelling-house. In statute. Devoe «l 



Com., 3 Mete. 327 ; People t>. McGra, i Mich. N. P. 27. 



r 



ADJOINING. 9 AD UL TER Y. 

ADJOINING' Continued. 

immediately land. In statute, Coventry v. R. Co., L. R., s 

£q. Cas. 104. 

next . In statute. Holmes «. Carley, 31 N. Y. 389. 

property . In statute. Re Ward, 52 N . Y. 395. 

ABJOTJBK. People v. Martin, 5 N. Y. 22 ; La Farge f. Van Wagenen, 14 How. 

Pr. 54. 

In statute. Bispham v. Tucker, Pen. 253. 
ABJOUBinSD. seasion. Mechanics' Bk. «. Withers, 6 Wheat. 106. 

term. Van Dyke «. State, 22 Ala. 57. 

ADJOXJBNMENT. Keen «. Queen, 10 Q. B. 933. 

ABJUDOISD. In statute. State «. Price, 11 N. J. (Law) 203 ; Blaufus v. People, 69 

N. Y. 107. 

against him. In injunction bond. Corderv. Martin, 17 Mo. 41. 

guilty of peijury. In statute. Blaufus v. People, 69 N. Y. 107.- 



(25 Am. Rep. 148). 
8nm\ . In statute. Ricardp «. Board of Health, 2 Hurl. & N. 264. 

ABJUSTMENT. Mayor of New York t. Hamilton Fire Ins. Co., 39 N. Y. 45 ; Page 

V. Holmes Burglar Alarm Co., 17 Blatchf. 484. 

ADMnVIBTEB. In bond. Sanford 9. Oilman, 44 Conn. 461 ; Moore «. Waller, i Marsh. 

488 ; Barbour «. Robertson, i Litt. 93. 

In statute. Sarah «. State, 28 Miss. 267. 

medicine. LaBeau t. People, 33 How. Pr. 66 ; 34 N. Y. 223. 

poison. Blackburn v. State, 1 1 Fla. 247 ; Sumpter «. State, 1 1 

Fla. 247, Rex v. Cadman, i Moody, 114. 

ADMINISTaATIOIl'. In statute. Crossan t. McCrary, 37 Iowa, 684. 

ADMnnSTRATOB. Sheldon «. Smith, 97 Mass. 34 ; Cooper v. Robinson, 2 Cush. 

184; Chadbourn v. Chadbourn, 9 Allen, 173; Palmer v, Kellogg, 
II Gray, 28 ; Finney v. Bumes, 97 Mass. 401. 

In note. Thomas v. Relfe, 9 Mo. 377. 

ADMI&AIaTY* and maritime jnriadiotion. In U. 5. Constitution, Re Steamer 

Josephine, 39 N. Y. 19; Propeller Genesee Chief «. Fitzhugh, 13 
How. 443- 

prooeedingg. Ex parte Graham, 10 Wall. 541. 

cases in . Union Ins. Co. v. U. S., 6 Wall. 759. 

ADMITTED. set-off. In statute. Walesby «. Gouldstone, i Harr. & Ruth. 

625 ; L. R., 1 C. P. 557. 

ADMITTING. In ajfidavit. Queen «. Slatter, 11 Ad. & Ell. 506. 

the aooount to be due. In statute. Clark «. Evans, 64 Mo. 258. 



In statute. Vidal v. Cammagere, 13 La. Ann. 516; Rhodes v. U. S.» 
Dev. 47. 

ADOFTIOV. by the people. In constitution. People «. Gardner, 4$ N. 

Y. 812. 

In statute. Anthony v. Gifford, 2 Allen, 549. 

In affidavit. Bowen v. Wilcox, etc., Mac. Co., 86 111. ii. 

ADULTBBATB. People 0. Fauerback, 5 Park. C. C. 311. 

ADULTEBY. Com. v. Lafferty, 6 Gratt. 672 ; Cook «. State, 11 Ga. 53 ; Miner •. 

State, 58 111. 59 ; Com. v. Call, 21 Pick. 509 ; State «. Wallace, 9 N. 
H. 515 ; State «. Lash, i Harr. (N. J.) 380; Hood t>. State, 56 Ind. 
263 ; Weatherby v. State, 43 Me. 258 ; State v. Hinton, 6 Ala. 
2- 



AFORESAID. 



Z2 



AGENT. 



In statute. First Nat. Bk. of 



AFORESAID — Continued. 

rate of interest greater than 

Whitehall «. Lamb, 50 N. Y. 95. 

AFOBETHOITGHT. In indictment. Edwards «. State, 25 Ark. 446. 
AFOUXto of a oow. In declaration, Haifer «. Delf) 3 Ind. 231. 



Sands 9. Lyon, 18 Conn. 27 ; Lamb v. Lamb, 11 Pick. 371 ; Hooper t^. 
Hooper 9 Cush. 122 ; Treadwell v. Cordis, 5 Gray, 341. 

In statute, Williams «. Burgess, 12 Ad. fz Ell. 635; Commercial Bk. 
V. Ives, 2 Hill, 355; Butts v. Edwards, 2 Denio, 164; Judd r. Fulton^ 
10 Barb. 117 ; Page «. Weymouth, 47 Me. 238. 

In will. Raynes v. Raynes, 54 N. H. 201. 

oonviotlon* In Constitution. State 9. Alexander, 76 N. C. 231 

(22 Am. Rep. 675) ; Blair*s Case, 25 Gratt. 850. 

judgment. In statute. Owston v. Coates, 10 Ad. & £11. 197. 

the fbot oommitted. In statute. Collins v. Rose, 5 M. &. W. 



AGEN07. 
AGENT. 



195- 

my debte and ftineral oharges are paid* In will. Fenwick 

V. Chapman, 9 Pet. 461. 

work* In insurance policy. Houghton v. Manufocturers' Ins. 

Co., 8 Mete. 114. 

one month . Gore«. Hedges, 7 Mon. 521. 

AFTEBNOOV. In statute. Reg. t;. Knapp, 2 £1. k Bl. 450. 

APTEBWABD8. In indictment. Holloway v. Queen, 17 Q. R 317. 

AGAINST* In indictment. State v. Prather, 54 Ind. 63 ; Com. «. Penniman, S 

Mete. 521. 

her wilL Com. «. Burke, 105 Mass. 380. 

the fbrm of the statute. In plea. Turquand v. Mosedon, 7 

M. & W. 510. 

the peaoe of the State* In indictment, Williams «. State, 27 

Wis. 402. 

In contract. Packing Co. v. Farmers' Union, 55 Cal. 606. 

Reg. •. Hynes, 13 U. C. Q. B. 194; Reg. v, Armstrong, 20 U. C. Q. 
R 245 ; Hinderer «. State, 38 Ala. 415 ; Dempster «. West, 69 III. 
613; People V. Allen, 5 Denio, 76; Hartford, etc., Ins. Co. v. Mat- 
thews. 102 Mass. 221 , Wilson t, (jenesee Ins. Co., 14 N. Y. 418. 

In bill of exchange. Bartlett v. Hawley, 120 Mass. 92. 

In contract. Sayre t. Nichols, 5 Cal. 487 ; Porter «. Hermann, 8 Cal. 
624 ; Haskell «. Cornish, 13 Cal. 47. 

In indictment. Tifit v. State, 23 Miss. 567. 

In note. Davis v. Henderson, 25 Miss. 556 ; Toledo Works «. Heiser,. 
51 Mo. 128. 

In statute. Com. «. Young, 9 Gray, 5; Com. «. Libbcy, 11 Mete. 64; 
R^. «. Cosser, 13 Cox, C. C. 187; Reg. u. Atkinson, 2 Moody, C.C. 
278; Rex f>. Hartley. Russ. & Ry. 139; Rex v. Squire, 2 Stark. 349; 
Reg. V. Atkinson, Car. & M. 525; Rex v. Beacall, 1 Car. & P. 310; 
Rex t>. Prince, 2 Car. & P. 517 ; Rex t>. Snowley, 4 Car. & P. 390; 
Rex «. Pearson, 4 Car. & P. 572; Rex «. Salisbury, 5 Car. & P. i55; 
Reg. V. Townsend, Car. AM. 178; Reg. f>. Hunt. 8 Car. & P. 642; 
Ree. V. White. 8 Car. & P. 742: Ree. t). Wilson, 9 Car. & P. 27; Reg. 
V. Welch. 2 Car. & K. 206; Ree. «. Townsend. 2 Car. & K. 168 ; Reg. 
«. Rees, 6 Car. & P. 606 ; Reg. t. Masters, i Den. C. C. 332 ; 2 Car* 



AGENT. 13 AGREE. 

AGENT— Continued. 

& K. 930 ; Temp. & M. i ; 18 Law J. (N. S.) M. C. 2 ; Reg. «. Miller, 
2 Moody, 249; Cox v. Mellish, Russ. & Ry. 80; Rex v. Burton, i 
Moody, 237 ; Budd v. The State, 3 Humph. 483 ; Com. t. Wyman, 
8 Mete. 247; Reg. «. Watts, i Eng. L. & Eq. 558; 2 Den. C. C. 14; 
State V. Hart, 4 Ired. 246; State «. Chandler, 2 Strobh. 266: Re^. «. 
Jones, Car. & M. 61 1 ; Rex «. Tyers, Russ. & Ry. 402 ; Reg. «. Mas- 
ters, 3 New Ses. Cas. 326; 12 Jur. 942; Reg. v. Sheppard, 9 Car. & 
P. 121 ; Walker «. Com., 8 Leigh, 743 ; Rex z. Jackson, i Moody, 
119; Com. «. Stearns, 2 Mete. 343; Reg. v. Lovell, 2 Moody & R. 236; 
Chennery f. Evans, 11 H. L. Cas. 115 ; Com. «. Libbey, 11 Mete. 64; 
Farebrother 0. Simmons ,5 B. & Aid. 334; Childsv. Str. Brunette, 19 
Mo. 518. 

derk or servant. In statute. Coats v. People, 22 N. Y. 145 ; 

Com. V, Stearns, 2 Mete. 343 ; Com. v. Young, 9 Gray, 5. 

intrusted with goods* In statute, Baines v, Swainson, 4 B. & 

S. 273 ; Monk v. Whittenbury, 2 B. & Ad. 486. 

or attorney. In statute. Colgin v. State Bk, 11 Ala. 222. 

or employee of an insnranoe oompany* In statute. Re 



Bowman, 7 Mo. (App.) 568. 
appoint an • Dixon v, Livingston Co. , 70 Mo. 239. 

general and speoial to transact all manner of business. In 

authority. Hodge v* Combs, i Black, 192. 

special • Witeher v. Brewer, 49 Ala. 1 19. 

AGi5XiXfif« In statute, Schulenburg v» Weiner, 6 Mo. (App.) 292. 

officers or servants. In statute, Budd v. State, 3 Humph. 

483. 

AG^GBSGATE. payments. In charter. Seibert v, Cavender, 3 Mo. (App.) 423. 

AG^GBIBVED. Tafft/. State, 39 Conn. 83. 

In statute. Switzler v. Rodman, 48 Mo. 19? ; Kinealy v. Maeklin, dj 
Mo. 95. 

party. In statute. Laekland v. Thomas 5 Mo. (App.) 1 53 ; State 

V. Boyle, 6 Mo. (App.) 58. 

party . In statute. Veazie Bk. v. Young, 53 Me. 551 ; Salmon v. 

Pearson, 8 Md. 297 ; Com. v. Graves, 112 Mass. 287. Roehfort v. 
Atherly, i Ex. Div. 511 ; Kingz/ Justices, 5 B. &C. 432 ; Swackhamer 
V. Kline, 25 N. J. (Eq.) 503 ; Raleigh v. Rogers, 25 N. J. (Eq.) 506 ; 
Adams v. Woods, 8 Cal. 306; Ely v. Frisbie, 17 Cal. 250; Kiefer v. 
Winkens, 3 Daly, 191 ; Deering v. Adams, 34 Me. 41 ; ex parte Sad- 
ler, 27 W. R. 1 56. 

person . In statute. Betts v. Shotton, 27 Wis. 670 ; Lowery v. 

Lowery, 64 N. C. no; Labar ?/. Nichols, 23 Mich. 310 ; Chappel v. 
Purdy, 12 M. & W. 303. 

State V. Hoe, 14 Q. B. 431 ; Avery v. Inhabitants of Tyringham, 3 
Mass. 160 (3 Am. Dee. 105). 

In contract. Baldwin v. Humphrey, 44 N. Y. 609 ; Newcomb v. 
Clark, I Denio, 226. 

In deed. Monypenny v. Monypenny, 9 H. L. Cas 114. 
In verdict. Benedict v. State, 14 Wis. 423. 

to let. In lease. McGrath v. Boston, 103 Mass. 371 ; Doe v. 

Benjamin. 9 Ad. & Ell. 644. . 
to rent or lease. In lease. Kabley v. Gas Co., 102 Mass. 394. 



AGREE. Z4 ALIENATEJD. 



— Continued. 

I to pay* In contract. Daviea v, Wilkinson, lo Ad. h EIL 99. 

I to seU* In coniract, Ives v, Hazzard* 4 R. I. 14. 

AGBEBABLB. to my wishes. In will. Stead v. Mellor, 5 Ch. Div. 225. 

AGBEEAHLY. to law. People v. Smith, 23 N. Y. 59. 

AGBEED. In plea. North v. Kizer, 72 111. 172. 

In statuU, Corbett v. Packington, 6 B. & C. 273. 

it is • In contract. Barton v. McLean, 5 Hill, 250. 

it is mutually • In contract, Mosher v. Southern Ex. Co., 58 

Ga. 37. 

AGBEEmNT. Holmes v. Jennison, 14 Pet 572 ; Packard v, Richardson, 17 Mass. 123. 

In statute. Ivory v. Murphy, 36 Mo. 534 ; Thompson v. Blanchard, 3 
^* Y* 335 \ Saunders v. Wakefield, 4 R & Aid. 604 ; Biddell v. Leeder, 
I R & C. 333; Hill V. Fox, 4 Hurl. & N. 362 ; Sears v. Brink, 3 
Johns. 210 (3 Am. Dec. 475) ; Sage v. Wilcox, 6 Conn. 81 ; Wain v. 
Warlters, 5 East, 10 ; Andrews v. Pontue, 24 Wend. 285 ; Broadwell 
V. Getman, 2 Denio, 87. 

oontraot or promise in writing. In statute. Kimball z^. Whitney, 

15 Ind. 280. 

in writing. In statute. Valle v. Kramer, 4 Mo. (App.) 570 ; 

Rosenbluth v. Dunn, 41 Conn. 619. 

or submission to arbitration. In statute. Wadsworth t/. Smith, 



L. R., 6 Q. B. 332. 

In contract. Wells v. New York Central R. R. Co., 42 N. Y. 181. 

AGBICUIaTURAIi. employment. In statute. Bachelder v. Bickford, 62 Me. 526. 

AGBICUI/TUBE. Simons t^. Lovell, 7 Heisk. 510; Bachelder z/. Bickford, 62 Me. 526. 

U. P. R. R V. Colfax Co., 4 Neb. 450; Re Smith, 3 Hurl. A N. 234. 

In statute. Com. v. Adams, 127 Mass. 15; Raiford v. State, 59 Ala. 
106; People V. Wood, 45 Cal. 293. 

and abet. State v. Cox, 65 Mo. 29; U. S. v. Gooding, 12 Wheat. 

460; Com. V. Knapp, 9 Pick. 496 (20 Am. Dec. 491). 

or oomfort. In statute. Young v, U S., 7 Otto, 60. 



AIRTIGHT. In patent specification. Chicago Fruit House Co. v. Busch, 2 Biss. 472. 

AIiABM. giving a fblse • In statute. Koppersmith v. State, 51 Ala. 6. 

AIjCAIiDE. Strotherz/. Lucas, 12 Pet. 442; U. S. v. Castilerro, 2 Black, 17, 194. 

AIiDEBMAN. Purdy v. People, 4 Hill, 384. 

AI^EATOBY. oontraot. Moore v. Johnston, 8 La. Ann. 488. 

AIJAS. In indictment. Kennedy v. People, 39 N. Y. 245. 

exeoution. Roberts v. Church, 17 Conn. 142. 

ALIEN* Thomas v. Ackleen, 2 B. & C. 798 ; Ainslie v. Martin, 9 Mass. 456 ; 

Jackson v. Wright, 4 Johns. 75; McKinney v. Savage, 18 How. 
235 ; Terry v. Ins. Co., 3 Dili. 409. 

In statute. McGregor. v. McGregor. 33 How. Pr. 456; 3 Abb. App. 
Dec. 92 ; Terry v. Ins. Co., 3 Dill. 409. 

the land. In statute. Maydwell v. Maydwell, 9 Heisk. 571. 

suoh . In statute. Wright v. Saddler, 20 N. Y. 320. 

ALIENATE. Burbank v. Rockingham Ins. Co., 24 N. H. 550. 

ALIENATED. In insurance policy. Pollard v. Somerset Ins. Co., 42 Me. 221 ; Mount 

Vernon Co. v. Summit Ins. Co., 10 Ohio St. 347 ; Smith v. Mon- 
mouth Ins. Co., 50 Me. 96 ; Rice v. Tower, i Gray, 426 ; Rollins v. 



ALIENATED. 15 ALL. 

AIJENATBD — Continued. 

Columbian Ins. Co., 25 N. H. 200 ; Phillips v, Behn, 19 Ga. 298 ; 
Tomlinson v, Monmouth Ins. Co., 47 Me. 232 ; Folsom t/. Belknap 
Co. Ins. Co., 30 N. H. 231 ; Shepherd v. Union, etc.. Ins. Co., 38 N. 
H. 232 ; Conover. v. Mutual Ins. Co., 3 Denio, 254 ; Allen z/. Hudson, 
etc., Ins. Co., 19 Barb. 442 ; Edmands i/. Mutual Ins. Co, i Allen, 
311 ; Edes v. Hamilton, etc., Ins. Co., 3 Allen, 362 ; Lockwood v, 
Middlesex Ins. Co., 47 Conn. 554. 

by sale op otherwise* In corporation act, Conover v. Ins. Co., 

I N. Y. 290. 

AXJENATION* Brewster v. Madden, 15 Kas. 249; Masters v. Madison Ins. Co., 11, 

Barb. 624. 

In insurance policy. Lane v. Maine Mut Ins. Co., 12 Me. 44. 

In statute, Riehl v, Bingenheiraer, 28 Wis. 84 ; Vinnedge v, Shaffer, 
35 Ind. 341 ; Sherwood v. Waller, 20 Conn. 263. 

AXJMONY. Chase z/. Chase, 55 Me. 21 ; Odom v. Odom, 36 Ga. 283. 

In statute. Waters v. Waters, 49 Mo. 385 ; Burrows v. People, 107 
Mass. 428 ; Parsons v. Parsons, 9 N. H. 309 ; Sheafe v, Sheafe, 
24 N. H. 564. 

and maintenaiiiOe* In statute. Calame v. Calame, 25 N. J. 

(Eq.) 548. 
Phillips V, State, 15 Ga. 518. 

In pieatHng. Bowen v, Jenkin, 6Ad. & Ell. 924. 

In statute, Harrington v. Smith, 28 Wis. 43 ; Dano v, R. R. Co.. 27 
Ark. 567 ; Guest z/. Opdyke, 2 Vroom, 552; Phillips z/. Saunders, 15 
Ga. 518; Kiefferz/. Ehler, 18 Pa. St. 388; Stone z/. Elliott, 11 Ohio 
St. 452. 

In will. Roe v. Nevill. 11 Q. B. 467 ; Alsop v. Russell, 38 Conn. 102. 

aotions. In statute. Fink z/. Hanegan, 51 Mo. 280. 

and every. In will. Allgood v. Blake, L. R., 7 Ex. 3391 

billB or notes. In statute. Batterson v. Porter, 2 Litt. 389. 

In statute. Flake v. VanWagener, 54 N. Y. 25 ; Jackson 



V. Reeves, 53 Ind. 231 ; Blevins v. People, 2 111. 172 ; Magrave v. 
White, 8 B. & C. 419; Gilbert v. Neely, 35 Ark. 28. 

— claiming under him* In deed. Clore v. Graham, 64 Mo. 249. 

— daims and demands. In written receipt. Gnimley v. Webb, 
44 Mo. 444. 

— orediV>rs of the firm. In composition. Kinsing v. Bartholew, 

1 Dill. 155. 

— debts. In statute. U. S. v. Herron, 20 Wall. 251 ; Sidaway v. 
Hay, 3 B. & C. 19. 

— demands. In statute. State Bank v. Tutt, 44 Mo. 367. 

— ftkiilts. Whitney z/. Boardman, 118 Mass. 242. 

— I am possessed o& In will. Wilde z/. Holtzmeyer, 5 Ves. Jr. 811. 

— I am worth. In will. Huxstep v. Brooman, i Brown's Ch. 437. 

— intents and purposes whatsoever. In statute. Haightz/. Joyce, 

2 Cal. 66. 

— I possess in-doors and out-doors. In will. Tolar v. Totar, 3 
Hawks, 74 (14 Am. Dec. 575). 

— judgment creditors of the debtor. In statute. Posey v. Persley, 
60 Ala. 243. 



ALL. l6 ALL. 

ATiTi — Continued. 

— judgments or deoreeB* In statute, Josselyn v. Stone, 28 Miss. 

753- 
legal oosts* James i/. Bligh, 1 1 Allen, 4. 

liability. In contract. Agawam Bank v. Strever, 18 N. T. 502. 



— matters in dispute* In submission to arbitration. Shack leford 
V, Purket, 2 A. K. Marsh. 435 (12 Am. Dec. 422) ; Hoover v. Neigh- 
bors, 64 N. C. 429. 

— matters of the allotment of dower. In constitution, Jiggitts 
V. Bennett, 31 Miss. 610. 

— moneys. In statute, Harrington v. Smith, 28 Wis. 43. 

— moneys reoeived« In statute. Reed v, Jones, 1 5 Wis^ 4a 

— my daughters* In will. Laker v, Hordem, i Ch. Div. 644. 

— my effidots* In will, Ennis v. Smith, 14 How. 400. 

— my estate* In will, Andrews v, Brumfield, 32 Miss. 108 ; Hogan 



V. Jackson, 6 Cowp. 299 ; Hilton v. Hilton, 2 McArthur, 70. 

— my estate and effbots* In will, Stokes v, Salamons, 4 Eng. 
L. &Eq.i33. 

— my estate both real and personaL In will. Jackson v, Bab- 



cock, 12 Johns. 389. 

— my estate whether real or personal* In will, Ballard v. Carter, 
5 Pick. 112 (16 Am. Dec. 377). 

my landed estate* In will, Myers v, Myers, 2 McCord's Ch. 



214(16 Am. Dec. 648). 

— my lands* In will. Wright v. Den, 10 Wheat. 204. 

— my other estate real and personaL In will. Countess of 
Bridgewater v, Duke of Bolton, 6 Mod. 106. 

— my other property* In will. Mayo v, Carrington, 4 Call. 472 
(2 Am. Dec. 581). 

— my personal property* In will, v, . 3 Ch. Div. 

309- 

— my property* In will. Mayo -o. Bland, 4 Md. Ch. 484. 

— my property of any nature or kind t h tsoever* In will. 



Mitchell V. Mitchell, i Ired. (L.) 257. 

— my property of every description* In will. Hurdle v, Ou- 
law, 2 Jones' Eq. 75. 

— my real estate* In will. Doe v, Harvey, 4 B. & C. 623; Right 



V. Creber, 5 B. & C. 867 ; Godfreys. Humphrey, 18 Pick. 537 ; Mor- 
rison V, Semple, 6 Binney, 94; Carr v, Jeannerett, 2 McCord, 66. 

— notes. In statute, Milne r/. Graham, i B. & C. 192. 

— personal effects* In deed, Bellamy v, Bellamy, 6 Fla. 62. 

— persons* In constitution. Ex parte Voll, 41 Cal. 33. 

— process* In statute, Brinsfield v, Austin, 39 Ala. 227. 

— raiL In bill of lading, Maghee v, Camden, etc., R. Co., 4^ 
N.Y. 514. 

— rents and profits* In contract. Metropolitan R. R. Co. v, De* 
fries, 2 Q. B Div. 189. 

— road crossings. In statute. Bradley v. New York R. R. Co., 
34 N. Y. 427. 

— sorts of wooL In statute. Pearce v, Cowie, i Holt, N. P. 69. 



1 

i 



ALL. 17 ALONG. 

ALL — Continued. 

Btreama In deed. Whitehead v. Parks, 2 Hurl. & N. 871. 

Buoh rates. In statute. Qaeen v. Mayor* 10 Ad. & £11. 68. 

the ohildren* In will, Ellis v, Houston, 10 Ch. Div. 236. 

the estate. In deed. Mundy v. Vawter, 3 Gratt 518. 

the gates. In statute. Rex v. Trustees, 4 B. & C. 363. 

the interest. In assignment, Stewart v, Stebbins, 30 Miss. 66i 

In decree, Harpham v. Little, 59 111. 509. 

the notes of hand. In will. Perry v. Maxwell, 2 Dev, Eq. 438. 

the property* In will, Howland v, Howland, 100 Mass. 222. 

the property I possess. In will, Brantly v, Kee, 5 Jones' 

Eq. 332. 
the real and personal estate. In will, Morgan v, Thomas, 6 

Ch. Div. 176. 

the remainder. In will. Den v, Schultze, 2 Green, 53. 

the residue and remainder of my real estate. In will, Parker 



V. Parker, 5 Mete. 134. 

the rest of my estate. In will. Read v, Payne, 3 Call, 225 

(2 Am. Dec. 550). 

the witnesses thereto. In statute, Buckeridge v. Flight, 6 B. 

&C. 54. 

two lots. In will, Creswell v, Lawson, 7 G. & J. 227. 

who may fbel interested. Hem v, McCaughan, 32 Miss. 19. 

writs of exeofution. In statute. Doe v. Roe, 18 Q. B. 806. 

ALLEaiAH'CE. Calvin's Case, 7 Rep. i ; Carlisle v. U. S., 16 Wall. 147. 
ALLOBIALi In constitution. Parker v, Dayton, 28 Wis. 368. 
ALLONGE. Folger v. Chase, 18 Pick. 63. 
ALLOTMENT. In statute. King v, Pitt, 5 B. & Ad. 571. 
ALLOTMENTS. In statuU. Doe v, Saunder, 5 Ad. & Ell. 675. 
ALLOW. In statute. King v. Inhabitants, 4 B. & Ad. 237. 

I to give. In instrument, Harmon v. James, 7 Ind. 263. 

ALLOWANCE. Davies v, Stacey, 12 Ad. & Ell 506. 

In statute. Smith v. Smith, 45 Ala. 264 ; Comm'rs v, Reissner, 58 Ind. 
260. 

ALLOWANCES. U. S. v. Landers, 92 U. S. n, 

AXiLOWED. In statute, Glenn v, Glenn, 41 Ala. 571. 

to be good. In statute, Townsend v, Hargraves, 1 18 Mass. 325. 

ALLUVION. Pulley v. Municipality. 18 La. 278; Municipality v, Orleans Cotton 

Press, 18 La. 122; County of St. Clair z/. Lovingston, 23 Wall. 46; 
Lovingston v, St. Clair County, 64 111. 56 ; Lovingston v, Heerman, 
9 Mart 656. 

ALMS. In statute. Queen v. Mayor, 2 Q. R 695. 

ALONG. In deed. Church v. Meeker, 34 Conn. 425 ; Seneca Indians v. Knight, 

23 N. Y. 498 ; Ledyard v. Ten Eyck, 36 Barb. 102 ; Comes v, Minot, 
42 Barb. 60. 

In statute. King v, Morris, i B. A Ad. 448 ; Walton v, R. R. Co., t^ 
Mo. 56. 

a river. In statute, Stevens v. R. R. Co., 5 Vroom, 532 ; Stevens 

V, R. R. Co., 6 C. E. Green, 259. 



ALONG. 



x8 



AMOUNT. 



AIMX& -^ Continued. 

the bank* Im deed. Howard v. Ingereoll, 13 How. 381. 

the xiver. In deed. Luce v, Carley, 24 Wend. 451. 

-» the route. In statute. Grand Trunk R. R Co. v, Richardson^ 
91 U. S. 454. 

— the shore. In deed Church v. Meeker, 34 Conn. 421 ; Child v. 



Starr, 4 Hill, 369. 
the street. In deed, Hammond v, McLachlan, i Sandl 323; 



fiSADY. 



Herring v. Fisher, i Sandf. 344. 

In statute. Apothecaries' Co. v, Roby, 5 B. & Aid. 949. 

inourred. In statute. Com. v, Burnett, 108 Mass. 30. 

when not done. In city ordinance. Re Burmeister, 6 N. Y. 

Week. Dig. 197. 

In will. Parish v. Cook, 6 Mo. (App.) 331 ; Fenny v, Ewestace, 4 M. 
& S. 60; Evans v, Knorr, 4 Rawle» 66; Anonymous, 2 Hawy. 161. 

In statute. City of Hannibal v, Winchell, 54 Mo. 172; Lockland v. 
North Missouri R. R. Co., 31 Mo. 180; Ponder z^. Shannon, 54 Ga. 
187; Waddell v. Mayor, 8 Barb. 95; Pish t/. Mayor, 6 Paige, 368; 
Com. V. Ha3rward, 10 Mass. 34. 

ALTERATION. Inhabitants of Gloucester v. County Commrs., 3 Mete. 379 : Oliver 

V, Hawley, 5 Neb. 439 ; Palmer v, Sargent, 5 Neb. 233 ; Morrell v. 
Otis, 12 N. H. 466. 

in the terms and oonditione of the insnranoe. In insurance 

policy, Brockelbank I/. Surgue, i B. & Ad. 85. 

or addition. In lease, Sherman v. Wilder, 106 Mass. 537. 



AI/FEBATIONS. In statute. Drew v. Mason, 81 111. 498. 

and repairs incidental to the risk. In insurance policy. Crane 

V, City Ins. Co., 3 Ped. Rep. 558. 

slight • Upjohn v. Inhabitants of Taunton, 6 Cush. 311. 

In constitution, Milwaukee, etc., R. R. Co. v, Pield, 12 Wis. 344. 

In statute, Reg. v, Plunkett, 21 U. C. Q. B. 536. 

on the lookout. In statute, Louisville, etc., R. R. Co. v, Stone» 



AlaTEBED. 



AI1WAY8. 



7 Heisk. 468. 
AMALGAMATE. with* In statute. Re Empire Ass. Co., L. R., 4 £q. Gas. 



341 



AMBAB8ADOBS. 



and other pubUo ministers. In constitution, 7 Op. Atty.- 



AMEULA* 
AMEND. 

AMENDED. 



Gren. 186. 

— Island. In insurance policy, Moxon v, Atkins, 3 Camp. 200. 



AMONQ. 

AMONGH3T. 

AMOUNT. 



Howard v, Michigan Southern R. R. Co., 5 How. Pr. 306 ; Geoige v, 
McClooy, 6 How. Pr. 200. 

In constitution, Milwaukee, etc., R. R. Co. v. Field, 12 Wis. 344. 

oomponnder* In statute. Bird v, Laycock, 7 La. Ann. 171. 

suit. Thompson v, Moulton, 20 La. Ann. 535. 

Knote V. U. S., 10 Ct of Claims, 397 ; 5 Otto, 152. 

In will, Hudson v, Hudson, 6 Munf. 352. 

In will, Casterton v, Sutherland, 9 Ves. Jr. 446. 

Ross V, Prentiss, 3 How. 711; McRee v, Ellis, 2 La. Ann. 163; State «. 

Wiltz, II La. Ann. 198; Gayarre v. Hays, 21 La. Ann. 307; State v. 

Judge, 21 La. Ann. 65; Udall v. The Ohio, 17 How. 17. 
in oontroversy. In statute. State v, Legarde, 21 La. Ann. 18; 






AMOUNT. 



19 



ANNUAL. 



AMOTTirr — Continued. 

State V, Judge, 22 La. Ann. 49; Smith v. Smith, 15 Vt. 620; Bradley 
T/. Kent, 22 Cal. 169; Maxfield v, Johnson, 30 Cal. 545; Moore v. 
Boner, 7 Bush, 26. 

in dispute. In statute, Malson v, Vaughn, 23 Cal. 61 ; Skill- 
man V, Lachman, 23 Cal. 198; Orth v, Clutz, 18 B. Mon. 225. 

of money in oontroveny. In statute, McNab v, Noonan, 2& 



AMDBEMENT. 
AlTAIiOOOnS. 



Wis. 447. 
public 



— • In statute. Com. v. Gee, 6 Cush. 179. 
formB. In statute. Smith v. State, 63 Ala. 57. 



Brown V. Hunt, 18 Ohio St. 311; McCarthy v. Marsh, 5 N. Y. 263; 
Banks z/. Walker, 3 Barb. Ch. 438; Den v. DeHart, 3 N. J. (L.) 363. 

In statute, Wheeler z/. Clutterbuck, 52 N. Y. 67; McCartyv. Marsh, 
5 N. Y. 263; Clark v, Shailer, 46 Conn. 119; Buckingham v, 
Jacques, 37 Conn. 402 ; Pratt v, Atwood, 108 Mass. 41 ; Prickett v. 
Parker, 3 Ohio St. 394 ; Armstrong v, Moran, i Bradf. 314. 

watoh. The Lady Franklin, 2 Low. 220. 

People z/. Nichols, 52 N. Y. 478 ; Hale v. Sweet, 40 N. Y. 97 ; Roome 
z/. Phillips, 24 N. Y. 463; Fredenburg v. Turner, 37 Mich. 402; 
Robbins v, Butler, 24 111. 428 ; Boag v. Lewis, i U. C. Q. B. 357. 

In deed, Walsh v, Trevanin, 1 5 Q. B 751 ; Jackson v. Topping, i Wend. 
388 (19 Am. Dec. 515) ; Thomas v. Perry, Pet. C. C, 491 

In statute* Porter z/. State, 58 Ala. 66; Streeter z/. People, 69 111. 595; 
Com. V, Hadcrafl, 6 Bush, 92; Robb v. Belt, 12 B. Mon. 647; Buck 
V, Dozenbecker, 8 Vroom, 359; Hopper v. Hopper, i Zab. 543; 
Queen v. Recorder, 6 R & S. 670 ; State v. Smith, 46 Iowa, 670. 

In will, Ely v, Ely, 5 C. E. Green, 44; Courter v, Stagg, 12 C. E. 
Green, 305 ; Doe v, Rawding, 2 R & Aid. 452 ; Re Merrick, L. R., i 
Eq. Cas. 551 ; Re Kirkl^ridge Trusts, L. R., 2 Eq. Cas. 400; Reidz/. 
Braithwaite, L. R., 11 Eq. Cas. 515; Sayward v, Sayward, 7 GreenlC 
210 (22 Am. Dec. 191). 

aooount for pay over. In statute. Supervisors v, Kirby, 25 

Wis. 498. 

In statute. Budge z^. Parsons, 3 R &S. 382; Hunt z/. State, 55 Ala. 138. 

of the oow kind. In statute, Watson v. State, 55 Ala. 150. 

any other domeetio . In statute. Budge v. Parsons, 3 R & S. 

382 J Bates V, McCormack, 9 L. T. (N. S.) 175. 

In railway placard, Cantling v, H. & St. Joe R. R., 54 Mo. 385. 

In statute, Harrison v, R. R. Co., 2 B. & S. 141 . 

■ other live . In statute, Reiche z^. Smythe, 13 Wall. 162. 

In statute, Shaw v, McGregor, 105 Mass. 96 ; Saco v, Hopkington, a6 
Me. 268. 

AXnSiOUJXCSD* In statute. Walker v. Heller, 56 Ind. 298. 

Park Bank v. Wood, 24 N. Y. 93. 

election. In constitution. People v, Keeler, 17 N. Y. 370. 

inoome. In will, Betts v, Betts, 4 Abb. N. C. 317. 

interest. In written agreement, McPike v, Kerr, 29 Mo. 79; 

Catlin V, Marsh, 16 Vt. 44. 

net value. Lt statute. King v. Inhabitants, 5 Ad. & Ell. 259. 

oflloe. Peppin v. Cooper, 2 R & Aid. 440 ; Harris v. Babbitt, 4 



A_W I *■ AT.- 



Dill. 190. 



ANNUAL. 



20 



ANY. 



AJIJNUAL — Continued. 

or ipeoial eleotion. Li siatuU. Phillips v. Town of Albany, 38 

Wis. 355. 

^ salary. State v. State Auditor, 56 Mo. 66. 

yalue. In statute. Re Elwes, 3 Hurl, ft N. 725. 

any or other ftitnre eleotioii. In statute. Mayor v. Oswald, 



AJIA U ALLY. 



Ainrnrr7. 



AmnjL. 

ANOT 



;• :i: 



3 El. A Bl. 670. 

Sparhawk v. Wills, 6 Gray, 163; People v. Brenbam, 3 Cal. 488. 

In statute. Bond t^. Clark, 6 Allen, 361. 

or in any way aha may wiah. In will. Hall t^. Hall, 2 McCord 

Ch. 28(X 

with intereat • In contract. Walker v. Kimball, 22 III. 537. 

Shufeldt t/. Abemathy, 2 Duer, 533; Horton t/. Cook, 10 Watts, 127; 
Booth V. Ammerman, 4 Bradf. 129 ; ex parte McComb, 4 Brad£ 151 : 
Nield V. Smith, 4 Ves. 491 ; Stephens v. Milnor, 24 N. J. (Eq.)3$8; 
Wagstaff V. Loweree, 23 Barb. 209. 

In statute. Parker v. Ince, 4 Hurl. A N. 54. 

bond. In statute. Winter v. Mouseley, 2 R A Aid. 805. 

In deed. Woodson v. Skinner, 22 Mo. 213. 

exeoution. In statute. Greenwood v. McGilvary, 120 Mass. 5161 

fslony. In statute. State v. Brown, 60 Mo. 140. 

treaeurer. In band. Citizens' Loan. Ass. v. Nugent, 11 Vroom, 

215 (29 Am. Rep. 230). 

debt, defiiiilt or miaoarriage of . In statute. Eastwood v. Ken- 
yon, II Ad. A £11438; Readert/. Kingham, 13C. R(N. S)344;Har- 
greaves v. Parsons, 13 M. A W. 561 ; Colt v. Root, 17 Mass. 229; 
Weld V. Nichols, 17 Pick. 538; Preble v. Baldwin, 6 Cush. 549; 
Pike V. Brown, 7 Cush. 123 ; Alger v. Scoville, i Gray, 391 ; Aldrich 
V. Ames, 9 Gray, 76 ; Morin v. Martz, 13 Minn. 191 ; North v. Rob- 
inson, I Duv. 71 ; Soule v. Albee, 31 Vt. 142 ; Flemm v. Whit- 
more, 23 Mo. 430; Pratt V.Humphrey, 22 Conn. 317; Hardesty 
V. Jones, 10 G. A J. 404 ; Mersereau v. Lewis, 25 Wend. 243. 

goods of . In statute, U. S. v. Maxon, 5 Blatchf. 36a 



ANSWBB. 



In statute. Strong v. Sproul, 53 N. Y. 497 ; Kelly v. Downing, 42 N. 
Y. 71 ; Howell v. Howell, 15 Wis. 59. 

exoept filing an . In statute. Henry v. Blackburn, 32 Ark. 44$. 

AJN TIOHBSSIS. Livingston v. Story, 11 Pet. 351 ; Garcia v. Garcia, 7 La. Ann. 526. 

In statute, Reg. v. Saunders, 9 Q. B. 237 ; Wilmot v. Rose, 3 El. A 
Bl. 564. 

aotion. In statute. Stiles' Appeal. 41 Conn. 329.' 

-: oanse. In statute. Logan v. Small, 43 Mo. 254. 

ohild. In statute. Overseers v. Guardians, 4 Q- B Div. 411 . 

daim for damages. In statute. The Blessing, 3 Prob. Div. 35. 

oontraot. McMurray v. Brown, i Otto, 257. 

oonrt. In statute. Collector v. Hubbard, 12 Wall. 3 ; Middle- 
brook V. State, 43 Conn. 257. 

oonrt of reoord. In statute. Mattler v. Schaffner, 53 Ind. 245. 

oreditor. In deed. Wells v, Greenhill, 5 B. A Aid. 8691 

eatate or interest. In statute. King v. Inhabitants, 2 B. A 

C. 135. 



ANY. 21 APPEALED. 

— Continued. 

judge. In statute. City Bk. v. Young, 43 N. H. 460. 

judgment* In statute. People v. Clark, 7 N. Y. 385 ; People 

V. Carnal, 6 N. Y. 463 ; Crossfield v. Stanley, 4 B. & Ad. 89^ Nes- 
bett/. Roshton, 9 Ad. & Ell. 426. 

juriadiotion or authority. In statute. Powell z/. Hibbert. 15 

g. a 129. 

meetiiig. In statute. Queen v. Stracahn. L. R., 7 Q. B. 464. 

one year. In statute. U. S. v. Dickson, 15 Pet. 143. 

other ftindfl. In will. Montresor v. Montresor, i Colly. Ch. 194. 

other matter or thing from the beginning of the world* In 

release, Hasley v. Whitney, 4 Mason G. C. 227. 

other manner. In statute. Melcher v. Boston, 9 Mete. 73. 

party to a oauae. In statute. 2 U. C. L. J. (N. S.) 130. 

person. In statute. Board ofWorksvR. R. Co., 14 Ch. Div. 

521 ; Queen v. Recorder, 9 Ad. & Ell. 871 ; 6 B. &S. 670; London 
Tobacco Pipe Co. v. Woodruff, 7 B. & C. 853. 

poll-book. In statute. Howard v. McDarmid, 26 Ark. 106. 

publio purpose. In charter. Rogers v. Burlington, 3 Wall. 654. 

suoh order. In statute. Reg. v. St Leonards, 14 Q. B. 341. 

surreyor. In statute. King v. Inhabitants, 7 B. & C. 440. 

witness. In statute. Magrave v. White, 8 E & C. 416. 

woman so divoroed. In statute. Allen v. Allen, 43 Conn. 419, 



at time. In statute. Queen v. Inhabitants, 9 Q. B. 885. 

in de&iilt of suoh issue of of them. In will. Powell v. 

Howells, 9 B. & S. 704. 

or of them. In statute. Fannin v. Anderson, 7 Q. B. 819. 

APABT. from her husband. In statute. Den v. Gerzer, 4 Halst. 225. 

APABTMENT. In statute. People v. St. Clair, 38 Cal. 137; Com. v. EsUbrook, 10 

Pick. 293. 

POTHEOABY. State v. Bolmes, 28 La. Ann. 765. 

In statute. Apothecaries* Co. v. Greenough, i Q. B. 798. 

praotioe as an . In statute. Apothecaries' Co. v. Warburton, 

3 B. & Aid. 43 ; Same v. Allen, 4 B. & Ad. 627. 

AFPABATU8. In statute. Coolidge v. Choate, 1 1 Mete. 79. 

AFP ABEL. goodsy wearing . Crichton v. Symes, 3 Atk. Ch. 61. 

neooosory wearing . In statute. Richardson v, Buswell, 10 

Mete. 506 ; Towers v. Pratt^ 33 N. H. 345 ; Frazierv. Barnum, 19 N. 
J. (Eq.) 316. 

wearing . In statute. Maillard v. Lawrence, 16 How. 251; Re 

Sanborn, 12 Canada L. J. 241. 

APPABSZTF. State Bank v. Hastings, 1 5 Wis. 85. 

In statute. Dewarz/. Swabey, 11 Ad. &. Ell. 913. 

danger. Evans v. State, 44 Miss. 762. 

good order. In bill of lading. The Oriflamme, i Sawy. 176 ; 

Blade v. Chicago, etc., R. R. Co., 10 Wis. 4. 
possession. In statute. Robinson v. Briggs, L. R., 6 Ex. i. 



APPEALED. Lawrence v. Souther, 8 Mete. 166. 



APPEAL. 



22 



APPOINT. 



People V. Justices, ii How. Pr. 400; U. S. v. Goodwin, 7 Cnincli, 
108 ; Wiscart v. Dauchy, 3 Dall. 321 ; U. S. v. Wonson, i Gall. 5; 
Hastings z^. Halleck, loCal. 31. 

In statute, Snoverv. Tinsman, 9 V room, 210; Hitsman t^. Garrard* 
16 N. J. L. 124. 

shall be brought. In statute. Hunter v. Griffith, 7 U. C. P. C. 

86. 

APPEAIJNG. party or appealed against. In statute. King v. Justices, i R. 

& Ad. 659. 

In statute. Clark v. Ross, i III. 261. 

waiving inquisition , etc. In note. Watson v. Wetter, 91 Pa. 

St. 385. 

Larabee v. Larabee, 33 Me. loa 

In statute. Wilson v. Fosket, 6 Mete. 40a 

at the trial. In statute. Jones v. St. Joe. etc., R. R. Co., 55 

Mo. 342. 

AFPBABAKGB. Foreman v. Lay, 6 Ala. 784 ; Clark v. Bryan, 16 Md. 171 ; Stein- 
bach V. Leese, 27 Cal. 295 ; Hendrick v. Kellogg, 3 Iowa, 215 ; Rose 
V. Ford, 2 Ark . 26 ; Coplinger v. Steamboat, 14 Ind. 480 ; Sullivan 
V. Frazee, 4 Robt. 616 ; Lutes v. Perkins, 6 Mo. 57 ; Ferguson v. 
Ross, 5 Ark. 517 ; Gooch v. Jeter, 5 Ark. 383; Glidden v. Packard. 
28 Cal. 649; Scott V. Hull, 14 Ind. 136 ; Ayres v. Western R. R. Co.. 
48 Barb. 132; Shaffer v. Trimble, 2 Greene, 464; Tallman v. 
McCarty, 11 Wis. 401; Wilson v. Fowler, 3 Ark. 463; Scott v. 
Niles, 40 Vt. 573 ; Weaver v. Stone, 2 Grant's Cas. 422 ; Mann v. 
Curley, 4 Cow. 148; Evans v. lies, 7 Ohio St. 233. 

In statute. Re Clipperton, 12 Q. R 688. 

APPELLATE. Hestres v. Brennan, 50 Cal. 211 ; Clark v. Ross, i 111. 261. 

APPEin>AGE8. In statute. State v. Somerville, etc., R. R Co., 28 N. J. (L.) 21. 

neoesaary for the aohool-honse. In statute. School District 

V. Perkins, 21 Kas. 536 (30 Am. Rep. 447). 

APPENDANCE. Leonard v. White, 7 Mass. 6 ; Jackson v. Striker, i Johns. Cas. 284. 

APPENDA19T. Leonard v. White, 7 Mass. 6; Jackson v. Striker, i Johns. Cas. 284. 

APPERTAINING, all other personal proi>erty to said railroad. In raiiway 

mortgage. Parish v. Wheeler, 22 N. Y. 494. 

APPLICABLE. Wagner v. Bissell, 3 Iowa, 402. 

In constitution. Evan^ v. Job, 8 Nev. 322. 

APPLICATION. In statute. Gas Co. v. Financial Soc, 7 Ch. Div. 241. 

for a oontinuanoe. In statute. State v. Maguire, 69 Mo. 200. 

on . In statute. State v. Stiles, 7 Halst. 296. 

APPLICATIONS, authorised to talce for insurance. In appointment. Wilson 

V. Genesee Ins. Co., 14 N. Y. 418. 

In contract. Manice v. Hudson River R. R. Co., 3 Duer, 426. 

In statute. North Eastern R. R. Co. v. Mayor, 9 R & S. 63a 

in cases where they . In statute. Wayman v. Southard, 10 

Wheat. I. 



APPEARING. 



APPLIED. 



APPOINT. 



People V. Fitzsimmons, 68 N. Y. 514. 

In constitution. Speed v. Crawford, 3 Mete. 210 ; Comm'rs v. Louis- 
ville, 3 Bush, 602. 
In statute. King v. Adams, 2 Ad. & Ell. 413. 
annually . In statute. City of Buffalo v. McKay, 15 Hun, 205. 



APPOINTED. 23 APPURTENANCES. 

— 

APPOINTED. or elected In statute. Doe z/. Hares, 4 B. & Ad. 442. 

person to an oi&oe. In statute, Davies v, Harvey, L. R., 9 Q 

B. 433- 

APPOINTMENT. Harris v. Clark, 3 N. Y. 93; U. S. v. Le Baron, 19 How. 73 ; U. 8. 

V, Stewart, 19 How. 79. 

In constitution. Justices v, Clark, i T. B. Mon. 82 ; Speed v, Crawford, 
3 Mete. 210; Comm'rsz'. Louisville, 3 Bush, 602. 

In statute, Sturgis v, SpofTord, 45 N. Y. 447 ; People v, Batchelor, 22 
N. Y. 128. 

as a oommissioner. In statute, Nicholson v. Field, 7 Hurl. 

&N. 811. 

JlPFORTION. Clarke v. Brooklyn Bank, i Edw. 361 ; Haight v. Day, i Johns. Ch. 18. 

APPOBTIONMENT. Ex parte Smyth, i Swanst 338 note. 

JLPPEAISED* value. In statute. Cummingsz^. Cummings, 51 Mo. 261. 

APFBAISEHS. In lease. Pool v, Hennessey, 39 Iowa, 192. 

APPBEHENDED. In statute. Ex parte Bollman, 4 Cranch, 75. 

King V. Mayor, 7 R & C. 630; Hopewell v. Amwell, 3 N. J. (L.) 422. 

Hopewell v. Amwell, 3 N. J. (L.) 422. 

regular of two years. In statute. State v. Jones, 16 Fla. 306. 

In constitution. Boston, etc., R. R. Co. v. Salem, etc., R. R. Co., 2 
Gray, i. 

— business. In corporation charter. Toll Bridge Co. v. Osbom, 
35 Conn. 7. 

— legislation. In constitution. U. S. v. Reese, 2 Otto, 214. 

. In policy of insurance. Smith v. Mech. A Trad Ins. Co., 32 N. Y. 

399. 

or used. In insurance policy, U. S. Ins. Co. v, Kimberly, 34 



Md. 227. 

APPBOPBIATION. Stratton v. Green, 45 Cal. 149 ; State v. Bordelon, 6 La. Ann. 

68 ; Hoyt v. Story, 3 Barb. 262 ; Waters' Case, 4 Ct. of Claims, 

3«9. 
In constitution, Eidemiller v. Wyandotte City, 2 Dill. 376.* 

In statute. Railroad Co. v. Tremont Co., 9 Wall. 89; McConnell v, 
Wilcox, 2 III. 344 ; Filor v. U. S., 9 Wall. 45. 

of property. In statute. U. S. v. Russell, 13 Wall. 623. 

bill. Hodgson v, Davis, 2 Camp. 532. 

indorsed paper. In contract. Mills v. Hunt, 20 Wend. 431 ; 

Guier v. Page, 4 S. & R. i. 

Myers V. People, 26 111. 173; Gray «/. People, 26 111. 346. 

State V. Cox, 65 Mo. 29. 

APPUBTENANCE. In execution. Munroe v. Thomas, 5 Cal. 470. 

McNish V. Munro, 25 U. C. C. P. 290; Harris v. Smith, 40 U. 
C. Q. B. 33. 

Indeed. Grant v. Chase, 17 Mass. 443 (9 Am. Dec. 161); Pickering 
V. Stapler, 5 S. & R. 107 (9 Am. Dec. 336); James v. Plant, 4 Ad. 
& Ell. 748; Bolton V. Bolton, 11 Ch. Div. 969; Leonard v. White, 7 
Mass. 6 (5 Am. Dec. 20); Farrar v. Stackpole, 6 Greenlf. 154 (19 Am. 
Dec. 201); Strickler v. Todd, 10 S. A R. 63 (13 Am. Dec. 49); Spaul- 
ding V. Abbott, 55 N. H. 423; New York, etc., R. R Co. v, Buffisilo 



APPURTENANCES. U ARMY. 



AJPFUBTESAJXCBB — Continued. 

R. R. Co., 49 Barb. 501 ; U. S. v. Harris, i Sumn. 21 ; Jackson t^. 
Hathaway, 15 Johns. 447; Harris t/. Evans, 10 Pet 25; Hill v. 
West, 4 Yeates, 142; Kenyon v, Nichols, i R. 1. 411 ; Philadelphia 
V. Philadelphia, etc., R. R. Co., sS Pa. St. 283 ; Bettsworth's Case, 
2 Coke, 31; Blackbomt/. Edgley, i P. Wms. 600; Hill v. Grange, 
I Plowd. 164; Ammidown v. Ball, 8 Allen, 293; McDermott v. 
Palmer, 8 N. Y. 383; Williams v. Baker, 41 Md. 523; Duane v. 
Broad Street Assn., 6 Mass. 232; Sparks v. Hess, 15 CaL 168: 
Hall z/. Benner, i Penr. & Watts, 402 (21 Am. Dec. 394); Parsons 
t/. Johnson, 68 N. Y. 62 ; Worthington t/. Ganson, 2 El. & EL 626. 

In mortgage, Frty v. Drahos, 6 Neb. i (29 Am. Rep. 353). 

In partition, Grubb v. Grubb, 74 Pa. St. 25. 

In rule of court. The Witch Queen, 3 Sawy. 201. 

In will, Blaine v. Chambers, i S. & R. 169; Smith v, Ridgway, L. R., 

1 Ex. 46; Mathews v, Mathews, L. R., 4 Eq. Cas. 278; Doe v, Ash- 
ley, 10 Q. B. 663; Doe V, Hubbard, 15 Q. B. 247 ; Helme v, Guy, 

2 Murph. 341 ; Otis v. Smith, 9 Pick. 293; Pheysy v, Vicary, 16 M. 
A W. 484. 

buildings or to buildings. In statute, Parmalee v, Hamble- 

ton, 19 111. 615. 

APFUBTENAHT. Lemon v, McKinnon, 19 Kas. 408. 

In insurance policy, i£tna Ins. Co. v, Jackson, 16 B. Mon. 242 ; 
Bigler v. New York Central Ins. Co., 20 Barb. 635; Crosby v. 
Franklin Ins. Co., 5 Gray, 504; Bryant z/. Poughkeepste, etc., Ins. 
Co., 17 N. Y. 200; Pindar v. Kings County Ins. Co., 36 N. Y. 648 ; 
Haley v, Dorchester Ins. Co., 12 Gray, 545. 

In statute. Com. v. Curley, loi Mass. 24. 

APT. time. Pugh v, York, 74 N. C. 383. 

ABBITRAMENT. and award. Gordon v, U. S. 7 Wall. 188. 

ABBTTR. A RTTiY. In lease, Treloarz/. Bigge, L. R., 9 Ex. 151. 

withheld* In statute, Treloar v, Bigge L. R., 9 Ex. 151 . 

ABDENT. or vinouB spirits. In statute. State v, Martin, 34 Ark. 340. 

ABE. ' In deed, Falkner v, O'Brien, 2 Ball. & B. 223. 

ABGUMENT. State v, California Mining Co., 13 Nev. 203. 

ABISEE*. cause of action shall have . In statute, Andrews z/. Hartford, 

etc., R. R. Co., 34 Conn. 57. 

ABISES* out ofL In statute, Scarborough v. Smith, 18 Kas. 399. * 

ABISING. during the course of the triaL In statute. People v. Turner, 

39 Cal. 371. 
oases in justices' courts. In constitution, Cookt^. Nellis. iS 

N. Y. 126. 

ABM. In statute, Att'y-Gen. v, Sillem, 2 H. & C. 623. 

of the sea. The Martha Anne, Olcott, 18. 

ABJOSD. vessels. In statute. Murray t/. The Charming Betsey, 2 Cranch, 

84; Parlin v, U. S., i Ct of Claims, 174. 

ABMS. In constitution, Fife v. State, 31 Ark. 455 ; Cockrum v. State, 24 Tex. 

394 ; English v. State, 35 Tex. 493 ; State v, Reid, i Ala. 612 ; 
State V, Huntley, 3 I red. (L.) 418 ; Andrews v. State, 3 Heisk. 165. 

'Of a State. Kirksey v. State, 7 Port. 529. 

In statute. Re Bailey, 2 Sawy. 200. 



AROMA TIC. 



25 



ARTICLES. 



ABOHATIC. Burke v. Cassin, 45 Cal. 467. 

oauae of action . In statute, Steele t/. Comm'rs, 70 N. C. 137. 



■A JtRilfi A TLB* 



ABBS8T. 



AJtBSSTS. 



ABBAIGNMENT. Goodin z^. State, 16 Ohib St. 344: Whitehead v. Com., iQGratt. 

640 ; Jackson v. Com., 19 Gratt 656. 

ABBANaSHBNT. In statute. Tetley v. Tetley, i El. & Bl. 540. 

A'ft-R.ATffmg'MKN'i'H, wlth the oompany. In statute. Manning v. Eastern 

Counties R. Co., 12 M. A W. 237. 

In bank by law, Kahn v. Bank of St. Joseph, 70 Mo. 262. 

of rent. In will. Hele v. Gilbert, 2 Ves. Sr. 430. 

of taxes. In deed. Corbett v. Taylor, 23 U. C. Q. R 454. 

Tracy v, Whipple, 8 Johns. 379; U. S. v, Benner, Baldw. 234 ; Lawson 
V, Buzines, 3 Harr. 416; Cooper v. Adams, 2 Blackf. 294; Courtoy 
V. Dozier, 20 Ga. 369 ; French v. Bancroft, i Mete. 502 ; Emery v. 
Chesley, 18 N. H. 198; Jones v. Jones, 13 Ired (L.) 448; Gold v. 
Bissell, I Wend. 210; Huntington v, Blaisdell, 2 N. H. 318; Hun- 
tington V, Shultz, Harp. 453; Hart v. Flynn, 8 Dana, 190; Field 
V, Ireland, 21 Ala. 240; Haskins v. Young, 2 Dev. & B. 527 (31 
Am. Dec. 426). 

In statute. Day v. Paupiere, 13 Q. B. 803. 

restraints and detainments of kings. In marine policy, Oli- 

vera v. Ins. Co., 3 Wheat 183 ; Aubert v. Gray, 3 R & S. 163. 

unlawAil restraints and detainments. In marine policy, Mc- 

Call V, Marine Ins. Co., 8 Cranch, 59. 

Gray v, Gardner, 17 Mass. 188. 

In statute, U. S. v. An Open Boat^ 5 Mason, 120; The Patriot, i 
Brock. 407 ; Parsons v. Hunter, 2 Sumn. 419 ; Levy v. McCartee, 
6 Pet. 102 ; U. S. v, Shackford, 5 Mason, 445 ; The Appollon, 9 
Wheat 362 ; Toler v. White, Ware, 25. 

at a foreign port. In statute, Harrison v. Vose, 9 How. 366. 

In insurance policy, Meigs v. Mutual Ins. Co., 2 Cush. 453 ; Simpson 
V, Pacific Mutual Ins. Co., 1 Holmes, 136. 

Reg. V, Cooper, 5 C. & P. 535 ; People v. Fisher, 51 Cal. 319; Young 
V. Com., 12 Bush, 243; Reg. v. Reader,. i Moody's C. C. 239; Creed 
V. People, 81 111. 565 ; Sampson v. Com., 5 W. A S. 385 ; Gage v, 
Shelton, 3 Rich. 242 ; People v, Taylor 2 Mich. 250 ; State v, Shaw, 
31 Me. 523 ; People v, Haggerty, 46 Cal. 354; Luke v. State, 49 Ala. 
31 ; Lockett v. State, 63 Ala. 6 ; Grimes v. State, 63 Ala. 167. 

In statute. Creed v. People, 81 111. 565. 

machine, mannftioture or composition of matter. In statute, 

Jacobs V, Baker, 7 Wall. 295. 

Hopkins v, Westcott, 6 Biatchf. 64. 

- In statute. Palmer's Ship Co. v, Clayton, L. R., 4 Q. B. 209 ; Kent v, 
Astley, L. R., 5 Q. B. 19; Slandoff Co. v. Lyndon, 8 C. B. (N. S.) 517. 

forwarded. In bill of lading, Wetzell v, Dinsmore, 54 N. Y. 

496. 



ABBXVSD. 



of mannftioture. In statute, Hejrwood v. Porter, i El. & Bl. 

440. 
of metal. In statute. Palmer's Ship Building Co. v, Clayton. 10 

B. & S. 177. 

other or thing. In statute. Queen v, Payne, L. R., i C. C. R. 28. 

In statute,- Wells v. Shook, 8 Biatchf. 254; May v. Smith, 48 Ala. 487. 
and effects. In statute. Re-presentment, i Jebb. 71. 



ARTICLES. 26 ASSA UL T. 

— Continued 

of proTiflioiL In statute. U. S. v. Sheldon, 2 Wheat 1 19. 

goodfl or tbiii^. In statute. Cohen v. R. R. Co., 2 Ex. Div. 

260. 

money, jewaLry, and of gold and ailyer manulkotare. Im 

statute. Stewart v. Parsons, 24 Wit. 242. 

[OEB. In statute. Chawner v. Cummings, 8 Q. B. 31 1 ; Queen v. Clewoith, 4 
B. & S. 927 ; Sleeman v. Barrett, 2 H. & C. {Mo. 

In statute. Bowkers v. Lovekin, 6 El. & Bl. 588; Ingram v. Barnes, 7 
EI. & Bl. 120. 

ikBTISAir. In statute. Duncan v. Bateman, 23 Ark. 327. 

ABT8. lost • Gaylor v. Wilder, 10 How. 477. 

naeftd ■> In statute. Corning z/. Burden, 15 How. 252. 

Rubber Co. v. Goodyear, 6 Wall. 153. 

In statute* Colt v. Hubbard, 33 Conn. 281. 

albreaaid. In statute. Morley v. Greenhalgh, 3 B. & S. 379 

Clark V. Hague. 2 El. & El. 286 ; re Morris, 6 El. 6l Bl. 385. 

fbr as rules of law and equity will permit. In will. Har- 
rington V. Harrington, L. R., 3 Ch. App. 565. 

he now holds the same. In deed. Spratt v. Jeffrey, 10 B. & C. 

260. 

her act and deed. In deed. Stuart v. Dutton, 39 111. 91. 

herein described. In specification. Thomas v. Welch, L. R^ 

I C. P. 193. 
if she had died unmarried. In will. Halton v. Foster, L. R., 

3 Ch. App. 505. 
in other dvil actions. In statute. Cravens v. Chambers, SS 



Ind. 5. 

— is most convenient. Miles v. Douglass, 34 Conn. 394. 



^long as wood grows and water runs. In lease. Ames v. Burt, 

I Vt. 303 (18 Am. Dec. 680). 
— — now in the occupation of. In will. Polden v. Bastard, L. R,, 

I Q. B. 1 57. 

now laid out. In grant. Welch v. Wilcox, loi Mass. 162. 

now located. In deed. Fellows v, Webb, 43 Iowa, 133. 

part. In agreement. King v. Inhabitants, 2 Ad. & Ell. 535. 

prindlial. In promissory note. McMillen v. Parkell, 64 Mo. 288. 

secretary. In note. Alexander v. Sizer, L. R., 4 Ex. 103. 

soon as practicable. In contract. Reedy v. Smith, 42 Cal. 425. 

to. In will. Gordon v. Gordon, L. R., 5 H. L. 255. 

to them shall seem best. In will Levitt v. Berne, 21 Conn. i. 

trustee. In contract. Pumpelly v. Phelps, 40 N. Y. 60. 

usually occupied. In deed. Sargent v. Hubbard, 102 Mass. 382. 

JlSCENDAHT. Bernard v. Vignaud. 10 Mart. 4S2. 

ASGEBTAIN. In statute. Taylor t^. McPheeters, in Mass. 351. 

ASHES. In statute. Reg v. Wood, 5 El. & Bl. 55. 

JLSSAXTIiT. U. S. V. Hand, 3 Wash. 425 ; Richels v. State, i Sneed, 603 ; U. S. v. 

Ortega, 4 Wash. 534; U. S. v. Myers, i Cranch's C. C. 310; State v. 

Hampton, 63 N. C. 13; Murray v. Boyne, 42 Mo. 472 ; Johnson v. 



ASSA UL T. 27 ASSA ULT. 

A88AXTIiT>- Continued. 

Tompkins, i Baldw. 571 ; Higginbotham v. State, 23 Tex. 574 ; 
Eeach v. Hancock, 7 Fost. (N. H.) 223; State v. Smith, 2 Humph. 
457; Smith V. State, 7 Humph. 43; Crow v. State, 41 Tex. 4(38; 
Com. V, White, no Mass. 407; State v. Shepherd, 10 lown, 126; 
State V, Epperson, 27 Mo. 255; State t/. Church, 63 N. C. 15; State 
V, Malcolm, 8 Iowa, 413; People v, Yslas, 27 Cal. 630; Com. v, 
Riiggles, 6 Allen, 588; Hays v. People, i Hill, 351 ; State v. Van- 
noy, 65 N. C. 532; *Reg. v, Martin, 9 C. A P. 215; Christopherson 
V, Bare, 11 Q. B. 473 ; Morton v, Shoppee, 3 C. & P. 373 ; State v. 
Rawles, 65 N. C. 334; State v, Sims, 3 Strobh. 137; Stephen v. 
Myers, 4 C. & P. 349; Kirland v. State, 43 Ind. 146 ; De Masentille 
V. Oliver, i Penn. (N. J.) 380; Barnes v. Martin, 15 Wis. 240; U. S. 
V, Richardson, 5 Cranch C. C. 348 ; State v. Morgan, 3 Ired. (L.) 
186; Read v. Coker, 13 C. B. 850; Ford v. Skinner, 4 C. & P. 239; 
James t/. Campbell, 5 C. & P. 372; State z/. Myers, 19 Iowa, 517; 
Button's Case, 8 C. & P. 660 ; Rex v. Rosinski, i M. C. C. 19 ; Rex 
V. Nichol, Russ. & Ry. 130; Hays v. People, i Hill, 351 ; Rex z/. 
Jackson, Russ. & Ry. 487 ; Stearns v, Simpson, 59 Me. 568 ; 
Meander v. Stone, 7 Mete. 147 ; Griffith v. Parsons, i Selw. 25; 
Innes v. Wylie, i C. & K. 257; Smith's Case, 2 C. A P. 449; 
Bloomer v. State, 3 Sneed, 66; State v. Mooney, PhilL (N. C.) 434; 
Smith z/. State, 39 Miss. 521 ; Keyes v, Devlin, 3 E. D. Smith, 518; 
Com. V, Eyre, i S. & R. 347 ; Stephens v. Myers, 4 C. A P. 349; Law- 
son V, State, 30 Ala. 14 ; Tarver v. State, 43 Ala. 354 ; State v. Black- 
well, 9 Ala. 79; Tuberville I/. Savage, i Mod. 3; Blake z/. Barnard, 
9 C. A P. 628; State v. Crow, i Ired. (L.) 375 j Com. v. Mann, 116 
Mass. 58; State v, Davis, i Ired. 128; Com. v, Adams, 114 Mass. 
323; Com. V, Stoddard, 9 Allen, 280; RainbQlt v. State, 34 Tex. 
286; People V, Bransby, 32 N. Y. 525; Smith v. Com., 54 Pa. St. 
209; Cutler V, State, 59 Ind. 300; State z/. Painter, 6j Mo. 84 ; State 
V. Adams, 20 Kas. 311; West v. State, 59 Ind. 113; People v, 
McMakin, 8 Cal. 547 ; People v, Anderson, 44 Cal. 65 ; Reg. v, St. 
George, 9 C. & P. 483 ; State v. Myerfield, Phill. (N. C.) 108 ; State 
V. Mullen, 45 Ala. 43; Agitone v. State, 41 Tex. 501 ; Rex v. James, 
I C. & K. 530; Robinson v. State, 31 Tex. 170; McKay v. State, 
44 Tex. 43; Kunkle v. State, 32 Ind. 220; State v, Pinkman, 81 N. 
C. 613 ; Com. V. McDonald, 5 Cush. 365 ; Johnson v. State, 26 
Ga, 61 1 ; Allen v. State, 28 Ga. 395 ; State v. Rawles, 65 N. C. 334 ; 
Keefe v. State, 19 Ark. 190; Long z/. Rogers, 17 Ala. 540; State v. 
Dinnen, 10 Minn. 409; People v. Blake, i Wheel. C. d 490; 
Com. V. Stratton, 114 Mass. 303; Reg. v. Walkden, i Cox's C. C. 
282; Reg. V, Hanson, 2 C. & K. 912; Bechtelheimer z/. State, 54 Ind. 
128 ; Reg. z/. Wilkins, 9 Cox's C. C. 20; Reg. v, Bennett, 4 F. & F. 
1 105; Jarnetz/. State, i Tex. (App.) 605; State z/. Benedict, 11 Vt. 
236; State z/. Baker, 65 N. C. 332; People v, Lee, i Wheel. C. C. 
• 364: Reg. V, Marsh, i C. & K. 496; Reg. v. Lock, L. R., 2 C. C. R. 
10; Reg. V. McGavaran, 6 Cox's C. C. 64 ; Reg. v. Case, i Den. C. C. 
580; Reg. z/. Flattery, 13 Cox's C. C. 388; Reg. z/. Sinclair, 13 Cox's 
C. C. 28: Reg. V. Miles, 6 Jur. 243; U. S. z/. Freeman, 4 Mason's 
C. C. 505 ; Reg. z/. Renshaw, 2 Cox's C. C. 285 ; Reg. z/. Philpott, 
Dears. C. C. 179; Com. z/. Simmons, 6 J. J. Marsh. 615; Reg. z/. 
Lewis, I C. & K. 419; State v, Gorham, 55 N. H. 15Z 

In statute, McCulley v. State, 62 Ind. 488 ; State v. Frcels, 3 Humph. 
228 ; Evans z/. State, i Humph. 394 ; Humphries v. State. 5 Mo. 203. 



ASSA UL TED. 28 ASSETS. 

motions of and battery. In statute. Newton v. Holford, 6 Q. 

B. 921. 

ABSAUI/rXD. In plea, Polkinghorn v, Wright, 8 Q. B. 197. 

ASSEMBIaAGE. In statute. Lancaster v. SUte, 53 Ala. 398. 

of people met Ibr reU^ioiui wonhip. In statute. Kinney v. 

State, 38 Ala. 224. 

ASSEMBLE. together. In statute. State v, Kempf, 26 Mo. 429. 

AflflElTBTiET), In statute. Re Richmond, 14 Daily Reg. (N. Y.) 869. 

ASSEMBLY. for the promotion of any moral or benevolent object. Im 

statute. State v, Gager, 28 Conn. 233. 

imlawAil . Reg. v, Brodribb, 6 C. A P. 571 ; Redford v, Birley, 

3 Stark. N. P. 79 ; R^. v, Vincent, 9 C. & P. 91 ; Reg. v, Kelly, 6 
U. C. C. P. 372 ; R6g. V, Neale. 9 C. A P. 431 ; Reg. v. Hunt, 3 B. 
A Aid. 566 ; Reg. v. Hughes, 4 C. & P. 373 ; Reg. v, Birt, 5 C. & 
P. 154. 

ASSENT. Suydam v, Clark, 2 Sandf. 133 ; White v, Corlies, 46 N. Y. 467 ; Myers 

V, Smith, 48 Barb. 614; Honeyman v, Marryatt, 6 H. L. Cas. 112 ; 
Johnson v, Appleby, L. R., 9 C. P. 158; Fitzhugh v, Wilcox. 12 
Barb. 255 ; Wadsworth v. Sherman, 14 Barb. 169 ; Re Beckwith, 5 
Hun, 443; Jenners v. Mount Hope Iron Co., 53 Me. 20 ; Hartford, etc., 
R. R. Co. V, Jackson, 24 Conn. 514 ; Stitt v, Huidekopers, 17 Wall. 
384 ; Washington Ice Co. v, Webster, 62 Me. 341 ; Hutcheson v. 
Blakeman, 3 Mete. (Ky.) 80 ; Baker v, Johnson Co., 37 Iowa, 186. 

In constitution. Canal Co. v. R. R. Co., 4 G. & J. i ; Hawkins v, Car« 
roll Co., 50 Miss. 735 ; State v, Brassfield, (i^ Mo. 331. 

in writing. In statute, Cormerais v, Wesselhoeft, 114 Mass. 550. 

ASSESS. In lease, Valle v, Fargo, i Mo. (App.) 345. 

ASSESSED. In statute, Goodhew v, Williams, 3 C. P. Div. 382. 

taxes during the term. In lease, Valle v, Faigo, i Mo. 

(App.) 344. 
ASSESSMENT. Taylor v. Palmer, 31 Cal. 240; Palmer v, Stumpf, 29 Ind. 329; 

Spangler v, Indiana, etc., R. R. Co., 21 III. 276 ; Hill v. Higdon, 5 
Ohio St. 243. 

In constitution. Weeks v. City of Milwaukee, 10 Wis. 243 ; Hurford 
V, City of Omaha, 4 Neb. 336 ; Smith v, Farrelly, 52 Cal. 77. 

Tn statute, Doyle v, Austin, 47 Cal. 354. 

rolls. In statute, Linn Co. Case, 15 Kas. 506. 

special . In constitution. Guild v. City of Chicago, 82 111. 472. 

ASSESSMENTS. Boers v, Barrett, 2 Cin. 67 ; Hale v, Kenosha, 29 Wis. 599. 

In lease, Stephani v. Bishop of Chicago, 2 Bradw. 249. 

special . In constitution. Hale v. Kenosha. 29 Wis. 599. 

taxes or . In statute. State v. Mayor, 36 N. J. (L.) 478 ; Ride- 

nour V, Saffin, i Handy, 464; Mayor v. Green Mount Cemetery, 7 
Md. 517. 

ASSESSOB. Fisk v. Gray, 100 Mass. 191 ; Atty.-Gen. v. Bouens, 4 M. & W. 191. 

ASSETS. In contract. District Tp. v. Same, 47 Iowa, 183; Lowber v. Le Roy, 

2 Sandf. 202 ; Smedley v, Philpot, 3 M. &. W. 574. 

In statute, Webb v, Whiffin, L. R., 5 H. L. 711 ; Helbert v. Banner, 
L. R., 5 H. L. 28; Steam v, Rogers, 3 B. & Ad. 371 ; Re Taggert, 16 
Bankr. Reg. 351. 



ASSETS. 29 ASSIGNOR. 



— Continued. 

equitable . Barker v. May, 9 R & C. 489 ; Bain v. Sadler, L. R., 

12 Eq. 570; Henderion v, Henderson, 3 Ired. (N. C.) 259; Benson 
V, Le Roy, 4 Johns. Ch. 651 ; Moses v. Murgatroyd, i Johns. Ch. 
119 ; Backhouse v, Patton, 5 Pet. 160; Block v. Scott. 2 Brock. 325 ; 
Cloudes V, Adams, 4 Dana, 603 ; Speed v. Nelson, 8 B. Mon. 499 ; 
Sperry's Estate, i Ashm. 347 ; Torr's Estate, 2 Rawie, 250. 

legal . Farr v, Newman, 4 T. R. 621 ; Attorney-Gen. v. Bnin- 

ning, 6 Jur. (N. S.) 1083 ; Lovegrove v. Cooper, 2 Sm. & Giff. 271 ; 
Deg V, Deg, 2 P. Wms. 416 ; Goodchild v. Terret, 5 Beav. 398 ; 
Charlton v. Wright, 12 Sim. 274 ; Rutledge v, Rutledge, i McCord's 
Ch. 469. 

ASSIGN. Gill V, Clagett, 4 Md. Ch. 153. 

In deed. Hutchins t/. Parleton, 19 N. H. 487. 

In lease. Frost v, Bollans, 5 B. & C. 613. 

In statute. King v. Inhabitants, 8 B. & C. 95. 

or otherwise part with. In lease. Holland v. Worsley, i 

Camp. 20 • 

ASSiaNABIiE. Thackert'. Henderson, 63 Barb. 271. 

ASSIQHED. In statute. Andrews v. Brown, i Iowa, 154; Williams v. Sautter, 7 

Iowa, 435. 

by indoraement. In statute. Sayre v. Lucas, 2 Stew. (Ala.) 259 

(20 Am. Dec.) 2 ; Reed v. Garr, 59 Ind. 279. 

by indoraement in writing. In statute. Reed v. Garr, 59 Ind. 



299. 

duly . In plea. Hoag v. Mepdenhall, 19 Minn. 335. 

shall not be . In insurance policy. Ellis v. Kreutzinger, 27 Mo. 

311 ; Wilson v. Genesee Mut. Ins. Co., 16 Barb. 511 ; Hoffman v. 
^tna, etc., Ins. Co., i Robt. 501. 

Mattoon v. Young, 45 N. Y. 697 ; Littlefield v. Perry, 21 Wall. 205. 

In statute. Hight v. Sackett, 34 N. Y. 447 ; Wisconsin Bankt^. Morley, 
19 Wis. 70; Tucker v. West, 31 Ark. 643; Potter v. Holland, 4 
Blatchf. 206; Bridenbecker v. Prescott, 3 Hun, 419 ; Page?/. Johns- 
ton, 23 Wis. 295 ; Wildney v. Whitney, 25 How. Pr. 75 ; U. S. v. Rod- 
man, 15 Pet. 125 ; Cumberland v. Planche, i Ad. & Ell. 580; Russell 
V. Ledsam, 14 M. & W. 585 ; Potter v. Holland, 4 Blatchf. 206. 

In statute. Comm'r of Patents v. Whiteley, 5 Wall. 522. 

ASSIQNING. without any reaaon. In order. Greswood's Case, 2 El. & BI. 

954. 
JLSSiaNMENT. Hicks v. Wirth, 4 E. D. Smith, 78 ; Hight v. Sackett, 34 N. Y.447 ; 

Bump V. Van Orsdale, 1 1 Barb. 634 ; Potter v. Bushnell, 10 How. 

Pr. 94 ; Bank of Marietta v. Pindall, 2 Rand. 465. 

In statute. Crow v. Beardsley, 68 Mo. 435 ; Cowles v. Ricketts, i Iowa, 
582. ; Potter v. Holland, 4 Blatchf. 206. 

for the benefit of oreditora* In statute. Lawrence v. Neff, 41 

Cal. 566. 

of errom. Squires v. Foorman, 10 Cal. 298. 

ASSiaNOB. In statute. Bump v. Van Orsdale, 1 1 Barb. 634 ; Jagoe v. Alleyn, 16 

Barb. 580 ; Clement v. Adams, 12 How. Pr. 163 ; Tulloss v. Rapelye, 
3 Abb. Pr. 93 ; Potter v. Potter, 18 N. Y. 52 ; Anderson v. Rusteed, 
5 Duer, 485 ; Hicks v. Wirth, 4 E. D. Smith, 78 ; Gardner v. Gordon, 



ASS/GJ^iTS. 



30 



AT. 



ASSiaNOB— Continued. 

3 Bosw. 369 ; Calkins v. Packer, 21 Barb. 275 ; Watson v, Bailey, 2 
Duer, 509 ; Beach v, Cooke, 28 N. Y. 508. 

of a thing in action or contract. In statute, McConnell v, Mc- 

Cracken, 14 Wis. 89; McHose v. Cain, 22 Wis. 486 ; Clarke v, Atkin- 
son, 2 E. D. Smith, 112 ; McGinn v. Worden, 3 E. D. Smith, 335. 

ASSIGNS. In deed. Peck v, Ingraham, 28 Miss. 246 ; Christie v, Phyfe, 19 N. Y. 

344; Brault V. Howard, 39 Mo. 13 ; Bailey v, De Crespigny, L. R., 4 

Q. B. 180; 10 B. & S. 6; Metcalfe v. Westaway, 17 C. B. (N. S.) 659. 

In insurance policy, Holbrook v, American Ins. Co., i Curtis' C. C. 

In lease. Greenaway v. Hart, 14 C. B. 350. 

In statute. Collier v. Gamble, 10 Mo. 467 ; Enloe v, Reike, 56 Ala. 500 ; 
Passaic Bridge v. State, 2 Zab. 593; Finney r/. Ford, 22 Wis. 174; 
Smith V. Clapp, 15 Pet. 125 ; Lewis v, Lewis, 9 M. & W. 663. 

Danforth v, Suydam, 4 N. Y. 66 ; Duke of Cumberland v. Graves, 7 
N. Y. 305. 

In will, McRea v. Means. 34 Ala. 349. 

fbrever. In deed, Hajrward v, Ormsbee, 1 1 Wis. 7. 

ASSISTANCE, writ of . Terrell v, Allison, 21 Wall. 289 ; Burton v. Lies, 21 Cal. 



87. 



ASSISTANT. 



overseer. 



ASSISTANTS, officers and 



Bennett v. Edwards, 7 B. & C. 593. 

-. In statute, Hawkings v, Newman, 4 M. & W. 614. 



ASSOCIATE. 

ASSOCIATES. 

ASSUME. 

ASSUMPSIT. 



ASSUBANCE. 
ASSUBEB. 

ASYLUM, 



ASYLUMS. 
AT. 



Smith V. Queen, 13 Ad. & EH. (N. S.) 78 ; Re Femandes, 6 Hurl. & N. 

717. 
continue to keep company or cohabit^ or criminally corre* 

spond with* In bond. Dormer v. Knight, i Taunt. 417. 

In charter, . Lechmere Bk. v, Boynton, 1 1 Cush. 369. 

Braman 7. Douse, 12 Cush. 227. 

Starke v, Cheeseman, i Ld. Raym. 538 ; Milward v, Ingram, 2 Mod» 
43; Rann v, Hughes, 7 T. R. 351 ; Moses v, Macfarlane, 2 Burr^ 
1008 ; Slade's Case, 4 Coke, 92 b ; Baker v, Harris, 9 Ad. & Ell. 532 ; 
Schleucker v, Moxsy, 3 B. & C. 789; Ballard v. Walker, 3 Johns. 
Cas. 60; McCloskey v. Miller, 72 Pa. St. 151 ; Carter v. White. 32 
111. 509 ; North v, Nichols, 37 Conn. 375 ; Thompson v. Thompson, 

5 W. Va. 190. 

In statute, Woodgate v, Grodfrey, 5 Ex. Div. 24. 

the . In insurance policy, Sunderland Ins. Co. v, Kearney, 16. 

Q. B. 938 ; Sanford v. Mechanics' Ins. Co., 12 Cush. 541. 
In statute. Re Tivnan, 5 B. & S. 645 ; Re Stupp, 11 Blatchf. 155. 

in the . In statute, Congreve v. Overseers, 4 B. & S. 865. 

used for the purpose of an . Li statute. Queen v. Overseers, 

6 B. & S. 451. 

In constitution. State v. Bacon, 6 Neh. 286. 

Farwell v, Rogers, 4 Cush. 460; Hurley v. Marsh, 2 111. 329; Mohawk 
Bridge Co. v, Utica, etc., R. R. Co., 6 Paige, 554; State v. Receiver, 
38 N. J. (L.) 299; Com. V, Cross Cut R. R. Co.. 53 Pa. St. 62; 
Mason v, Brooklyn, etc., R. R. Co., 35 Barb. 373. 

In indictment. State z/. Nolan, 8 Rob. (La.) 513. 

In will, Colt V, Hubbard, 33 Conn. 281. 

lOOs. In contract, Spicer v. Cooper, i Q. B. 424. 



AT. 3i Ai: 

AT — Continued. 

and from. In insurance policy, Foley v, Ins. Co., L. R., 5 C. P. 

155 ; Stillwell v. Commercial Ins. Co., 2 Mo. (App.) 31 ; Seamans v. 
Loring, i Mason, 127 ; Dickey «/. Baltimore Ins. Co., 7 Cranch, 327 ; 
McLanahan v. Universal Ins. Co., i Pet. 184; Taylor v, Lowell, 5 
Mass. 331 ; Merchants' Ins. Co. v, Clapp» 1 1 {Pick. 56 ; Patrick v, 
Ludlow, 3 Johns. Cas. 10 (2 Am. Dec. 130); Kemble z/. Bowne, i 
Caines, 75; Smith v. Steinback, 2 Caines, 158; Garrigues v. Coxe,. 
I Binn. 592 ; Matteux v. London Ass. Co., 1 Atk. ; Davy v, HalletU 
3 Caines, 16 (2 Am. Dec. 241) ; Fernandez v, N. Y. Mut. Ins. Co., 48. 
N. Y. 571 ; De Peyster v. Sun Mut. Ins. Co., 19 N. Y. 272 ; Stillwell 
V, Home Ins. Co., 3 Dill. 80; Insurance Co. v, Folsom, 18 Wall. 237 ; 
Hughes V, Union Ins. Co. 8 Wheat. 294 ; Columbian Ins. Co. v, Cat- 
lett, 12 Wheat. 383. 

Li statute. Chesapeake, etc., R. R. Co. v. Key, 3 Cranch C. C. 599. 

and from Boeton to St. Thomas and a market. In insurance 

policy. Deblois v. Ocean Ins. Co., 16 Pick. 303 (28 Am. Dec. 245). 

an offioe or banking-houae. In statute. Merchants' Bk. v^ 

State Bk., 10 Wall. 604. 

any tavern. In statute. Ray v. State, 50 Ala. 172. 

a salary of $2,600 per ^Timim* In contract. Haney v. CaidwelU 

35 Ark. 156. 

large. In statute. Com. v. Dow, 10 Mete. 382 ; McAneany v.. 



Jewett, 10 Allen, 151. 

— law. In statute. Fleming v. Burgin, 2 Ired. (Eq.) 584. 

— least. In contract. Roberts v. Wilcocks, 8 W. & S. 464. 



In statute. Zouch v. Empsey, 2 B. & Aid. 522 ; Reg. v. Shropshire^ 
8 Ad. & Ell. 173 ; Mitchell v. Foster, 12 Ad. & Ell. 472. 

or near. In statute. Fall River R. R. Co. v. Old Colony R. R« 

Co., 5 Allen, 222 ; Bartlett v. Jenkins, 22 N. H. 53. 

or within. In will. Homer v. Homer, 8 Ch. Div. 758. 

owner's risk. In contract. D'Arc v. R. R. Co., L. R, 9C. 

P. 325. 

In insurance policy. Wood v. New England Ins. Co., 14 Mass. 



31 (7 Am. Dec. 182); Washington Ins. Co. v. White, 103 Mass. 239; 
Bowen v. Hope Ins. Co., 20 Pick. 275 ; Eyre v. Marine Ins. Co., 6 
Whart 247 ; Gookin v. New England* etc., Ins. Co., 12 Gray, 501 ; 
Union Ins. Co. v. Tysen, 3 Hill, 118. 

In statute. The Harriet, i Story, 251. 

— starting. In contract. Shadwell v. Shadwell, 9 C. B. (N. S.) 160. 

the age. In will. Doe v. Ward, 9 Ad. & Ell. 582. 

the date of its passage. In statute. Bassett v. U. S., 2 Ct. of 

CI. 448. 

the dwelling-honse. In Illinois statute. Kibbe v. Benson, 17 

Wall. 624. 
the end of the year. Arman v. Baker, 49 K. H. 161. 

the expiration of. In statute. Re Ruddy, L. R., 2 P. & D. 

330. 

the same time. In statuU. Queen v. Inhabitants, 9 Q. R 663. 
the time oil In statute. Brown v. Wilkinson, 15 M. & W. 391. 
the term. In statute, Lawver v^ Langhans, 85 111. 138. 



AT. 



32 



ATTORNEY. 



AT — Continued. 



ATLANnO. 



ATTA 



•I : I c^ I 



the taial. In statute. Pieq>ont v, Cartwright, 5 C. P. Div. 139. 

this date. Moore v, Korty, it Ind. 341. 

XTnited States coast. In insurance policy. New Haven, etc., 

Co. V, Security Ins. Co., 7 Fed. Rep. 847. 

in any suit. In statute, Bolles v. Smith, 39 Conn. 216. 

on mesne process. In statute. Re Joslyn, 2 Biss. 235. 



ATTA 
ATTAOr. 



:■ iH 



ATTAINDER. 



ATTEMFF. 



T. In statute, Jenison v, Dyson, 9 M. & W. 541. 

the age of twenty-one. In will, Muskett v, Eaton, i Ch. Div. 

437. 
Cozens v. Long, 3 N. J. (L.) 559. 

bill of . In constitution^ Dreham v. Stifle, 8 Wail. 595 ; Cum- 
mins z/. State, 4 Wall. 277 ; ex parte Garland, 4 Wail. 333. 

Stow V, Converse, 4 Conn. 17; McDermott v. People, 5 Park. C. C. 
102 ; Mulligan v. People, 5 Park. C. C. 105. 

In indictment. State v, Marshall, 14 Ala. 411. 

In statute. Com. v. McDonald, 5 Cush. 368 ; Uhl v. Com., 6 Gratt. 
706; State z/. Clarissa, 11 Ala. 57. 

In verdict. Hart v. State, 38 Tex. 382. 

at firaud. In insurance policy, Shaw v, Scottish Ins. Co., i Fed. 

Rep. 763. 

to selL In statute, Moore v. Young, 4 Biss. 128. 



nrvp 



— to commit any oflbnse. In statute. Cox v. People* 82 III. 191. 

ATTEin>An'CE. each day's . In constitution. State v, Hastings, 16 Wis. 338. 

ATTENDED. Miller v, McDonald, 13 Wis. 673. 

ATTENDING. Evererd v, Pappleton, 5 Q. B. 183. 

physician. In insurance policy, Gibson v, American Mut. Ins. 

Co., 37 N. Y. 580. 

persons at the assises. In statute, Simon v, Gratz, 2 Penr. & W. 

412 (23 Am. Dec. i). 

ATTENTION, your bill shall have . In Utter, Rees v, Wamick, 2 B. & Aid. 1 1 5. 

ATTEST. Griffiths v, Griffiths, L. R., 2 P. & D. 300; Freshfield v, Reid, 9 M. & 

W. 404 ; Burdett v, Spillsbury, 6 M. & G. 426. 

Lewis V, Lewis, 13 Barb. 17. 

In statute. Doe v, Burdett, 9 Ad. & Ell. 936. 

In deed, Freshfield v. Reed, 9 M & W. 404. 

by two witnesses. In statute. Logwood v, Hussey, 60 Ala. 417. 

copy. In statute. Wait v, Demeritt, 119 Mass. 158. 

note. In statute. Walker v, Warfield, 6 Mete. 466 ; Village Bank 

V. Arnold, 4 Mete. 588. 

witness. In statute. Jenkins v. Dawes, 115 Mass. 600. 



ATTESTED. 



ATTESTING. 
ATTOBNEY. 



In statute, Ingram v, Richardson, 2 La. Ann. 839 ; Trowbridge v. Weir, 
6 La. Ann. 706 ; Whittle v, Renner, 55 Cal. 395 ; Fox v, Jackson. 8 
Barb. 335 ; Bradley v, Fisher, 13 Wall. 335 ; Neflft/. Powell. 6 Blackf. 
420; State Bank v, Martin, 4 Ala. 615 ; Reg. v. Priest, 20 L. J. (Q. B.) 

17. 

at law. Denton v, Noyes, 2 Johns. 296 ; Waters v, Whittemore. 

22 Barb. 595 ; Merritt z/. Lambert, 10 Paige, 352 ; Bailey v, Delaplaine, 
I Sandf. II ; Hughes v. Mulvey, i Sandf. 92; ex parte Yale. 24 Cal. 
241 ; Fletcher z'. Dangerfield, 20 Cal. 430 ; Byrne v, Stewart, 3 Dessaus. 



A TTORNE F. 33 A UTHORIT V. 

ATTO&nJBX — Continued. 

466; Ingersoll t/. Howard, i Heisk. 247; Austin's Case, 5 Rawle. 
191 ; ex parte Heyfron, 7 How. (Miss.) 127 ; ex parte Garland, 4 Wall. 
333: Leigh's Case, i Munf. 468; ex parte Faullcner, i W. Va. 269; 
ex parte Law, 35 Ga. 285; Hallowell's Case, 3 Dall. 410; Hall 7/. 
Sawyer, 47 Barb. 116. 

— ^ in fbot. Porter v. Herman, 8 Cal. 619. 

agent or . /« statute, Clark v, Morse. 16 La. 375 ; Neff ?'. Powel!. 

6 Blackf. 420. 

AXTCnON. Rex v, Taylor. 13 Price, 336; Walker v. Advocate, i Dow. H. L. in ; 

Campbell v. Swan, 48 Barb. 109; Crandall v. State, 28 Ohio St. 479. 

In statute, Fretwell v, Troy, 18 Kas. 271. 

AUCnonEEB. Wilkes v. Ellis, 2 H. Bl. $55; McMeachan ?/. Mayor, 3 Harr. & J. 

534; Hunt t'. Philadelphia, 35 Pa. St. 277; Waterhouse z^. Dorr, 4 
Me. 333 ; Clark v, Cushman, 5 Mass. 505 ; State z/. Conkling, 19 Cal. 
501 ; State v, Rucker, 24 Mo. 557. 

In statute. City of Goshen v, Kern, 63 Ind. 468 (30 Am. Rep. 234) ; 
Fretwell v. Troy, 18 Kas. 271. 

AirCnOinmB& in catalogue of sale, Franklyn v. Lamond, 4 C. B. 644. 

AUDIT. In statute. Re Murphy, 24 Hun, 592. 

AUDITA. querela. Young v. Collet, T. Ray. 89; Sutton v. Bishop, 4 Burr. 

2283 ; Baker v, Ridgway, 2 Bing. 41 ; Little ?/. Cook, i Aiken, 363; 
Lovejoy v. Webber, 10 Mass. 103; Bruckett v, Winslow, 17 Mass. 
159; Johnson v, Harvey, 4 Mass. 485 ; Johnson v. Plimpton, 30 Vt. 
420; Poultney V. Treasurer, 25 Vt. 168; Brooks t/. Hunt, 17 Johns. 
484; Nathan v. Giles, 5 Taunt. 558; Waddington v. Vredenberg, 2 
Johns. Cas. 227 ; Stainford v. Barry, i Aikens, 321 (15 Am. Dec. 692). 

AUDITOB. Blain v. Patterson, 48 N. H. 151 ; Whitwell v, Willard, i >fetc. 216; 

Field V, Holland, 6 Cranch, 8; Fisk v. Gray, 100 Mass. 193. 

In constitution. State v, Hastings, 10 Wis. 530. 

In statute, Locke v, Bennett, 7 Cush. 451; Whitwell v. Willard. i 
Mete. 216. 

AUTHENTICATION. Ordway v, Ordway, 4 Wis. 45. 

AUTHOR. In statute, Jeffreys v, Boosey, 4 H. L. Cas. 815 ; Routledge v. Low, L. 

R., 3 H. L. 100; Wood V, Boosey, 9 B. & S. 181 ; Burns v. Wood- 
ruff, 4 Wash. 48 ; Atwill v, Ferrett, 2 Blatchf. 39 ; Shepherd v. Con-, 
quest, 17 C. B. 444 ; Heine v, Appleton, 2 Blatchf. 125. 

or oomposer. In statute. Wood v, Boosey, L. R., 2 Q. B. 340. 

AUTHOBIT7. In statute, Comm*rs v, Alleghany, 20 Md. 449; CommVs v, Duckett, 

20 Md. 468. 

exercised under the United States. In statute. Day v, Gal- 



lup, 2 Wall. 97; Dupasseur v, Rochereau, 21 Wall. 130; Verden v. 
Coleman, i Black, 472. 

of law. In constitution, Reineman 7/. C. C. & B. H, R. R., 7 Neb. 

310. 
to pay. In statute. Queen v, Kay, L. R., i C. C. R. 260. 

apparent • Jolly v, Rees, 15 C. B. (N. S.) 640. 

presumed . Jolly v, Rees, 15 C. B. (N. S.) 640. 

by of and as agents for. In statute. Lennard v, Robinson, 5 

Et. & Bl. 125. 

previous . In statute. Palmers. Yates, 3 Sandf. 137. 



A UTHORIZED. 



34 



BAGGAGE. 



AUTHOBIZED. In statute. Queen v. Perry, 3 El. & Bl. 125. 

and empowered. In statute. People v, Herkimer Co.» 56 Barb. 

452. 
not by law. Com. v, Dana, 2 Mete. 329. 

AVATtiABTiE, In statute, Marks v. Hall, 7 B. & S. 841. 

oapital. Venezuela R. Co. v, Kusch, L. R., 2 H. L. Cas. 99. 

fbr adjudioation. In statute. Re Bedell, 7 Ch. Div. 123. 

means. In assignment, Brigham v. Tillinghast, 13 N. Y. 215. 



AVAILS. 
AVEBAGE. 



In will, McNaughton v, McNaughton, 34 N. Y. 201 ; Allen v, De 
Witt. 3 N. Y. 277. 

In contract. Whitney v. Thacher, 117 Mass. 523; Coster v. Phoenix 
Ins. Co., 2 Wash. C. C. 51. 

— ^^hargee. In charter, Hersh v. North Central R. Co., 74 Pa, 
St. 181. 

or claim. In insurance policy. Carr v, Ins. Co., 5 B. & S. 437. 

free firom unless general. In insurance policy. Biays v, Ins. 

. Co., 7 Cranch, 415. 

general . Sterling v. Forrester, 3 Bligh, 590; Louisville, etc., 

Ins. Co. V. Bland, 9 Dana, 147 ; Nimic v. Holmes, 25 Pa. St. 371 ; 
Crockett v. Dodge, 3 Fairf. (Me.) 190; Simms v. Gurney, 4 Binn. 
524; Williams v, Suffolk Ins. Co., 3 Sumn. 513. 

AVEBlOSirF. Van Vechten v. Hopkins, 5 Johns. 211; Cheetham v. Tillotson, 5 

Johns. 430; Prigmore v, Thompson, Minor, 420. 

usual • In statute. Voglesong v. State, 9 Ind. 1 12 ; State v. Con- 



AVOCATION. 

AVOIDABI^E. 
AWABI>. 



BAD. 



BABQE. 
BAGKatAGE. 



ger, 14 Ind. 396. 

damage* In deed. Elliott v. R. Co.. 10 H. L. Cas. 334. 

Johnson v. Moxey, 43 Ala. 521 ; Richards v. Griffin, 5 Ala. 195. 

lands. In will. Ryerssv. Wheeler, 22 Wend. 148; (Lawson's 

Usages and Customs, 3Si-) 

girL Snell v. Snow, 13 Mete. 280. 

woman. Riddell v. Thayer, 127 Mass. 487. 

persons of notoriously character. In statute. Parker v. 

Green, 2 B. & S. 299. 

of fraud. In instruction. Pilling v. Otis, 13 Wis. 496. 

Johnson v. Fall River R. Co., 5 Cush. 72 ; Orange County Bank v. 
Brown, 9 Wend. 85 (24 Am. Dec. 129); Grant v, Newton, i E. D. 
Smith, 99; Bell v. Drew, 4 E. D. Smith, 59; Cincinnati, etc., R. Co. v, 
Marcus, 38 III. 219; Hellman v. Holladay, i Woolw. 365; Torpey v. 
Williams, 3 Daly, 162; The Ionic, 5 Blatchf. 538; Walsh v. Str. H. 
M. Wright, I Newb. Adm. 494 ; Steers v. Liverpool, etc., R. Co., 
57 N. Y. I ; Kevins v. Bay State Steamboat Co., 4 Bosw. 225 ; Mich- 
igan, etc., R. Co. v. Carrow, 73 111. 348; Cadwallader v. Grand 
Trunk R. Co., 9 Lower Canada Rep. 169: McCormick z/. Hudson 
R. R. Co., 4 E. D. Smith, 181 ; McGill v. Rowand, 3 Pa. St. 451 ; 
Jones v. Voorhees, 10 Ohio, 145 ; Am. Contract Co. v. Cross, 8 Bush, 
472; Brooke v. Pickwick, 4 Bing. 218; Fraloff v. New York, 
etc., R. Co., 10 Blatchf. 16; 100 U. S. 24; McDou^ll v. Tor- 
rance, 4 Lower Canada Jur. 233; S. C, 12 Lower Canada Rep. 
321 ; Dunlap v. International Steamboat Co., 98 Mass. 371 ; Weed 
V. Saratoga, etc., R. Co., 19 Wend. 534; Becker v. Great Eastern 
R. Co., L. R., 5 Q. B. 241 ; S. C, 22 L. T. (N. S.) 299; 18 Week. 



BAGGAGE. 



35 



BALE. 



BAGOAGE — Continued. 

Rep. 627; 39 L. J. (Q. B.) 122; Chicago, etc., R. Co. v. Boyce, 73 
111. 510; Dexter v. Syracuse, etc., R. Co., 42 N. Y. 326; First Nat. 
Bank v. Marietta, etc., R. Co., 20 Ohio St. 260; Mississippi, etc., R. 
Co. z'. Kennedy, 41 Miss. 671 ; Dexter z/. Syracuse, etc., R. Co.. 42 N. 
Y. 326; Curtis V, Delaware, etc., R. Co., 74 N. Y. 116; Hudston v. 
Midland, etc., R. Co., 10 Best & S. 504; S. C, L. R.. 4 Q. B. 366; 
Phelps V. London, etc., R. Co., 19 C. B. (N. S.) 321 ; S. C, 11 Jur. 
(N. S.) 652 ; 34 L. J. (C P.) 259; 13 Week. Rep. 782 ; 12 L. T. (N. S.) 
496; Thomas v. Great Western R. Co., 14 Upper Canada Q. B. 
389; Hirschsohn v. Hamburgh Am. Packet Co., 2 Jones ft Sp. 521 ; 
Ouimit V, Henshaw, 35 Vt. 604; Macrow v. Great Western R. 
Co., L. R., 6 Q. B. 612 ; S. C, 40 L. J. (Q. B.) 300, 24 L. T. (N. S.) 
618; 19 Week. Rep. 673; Connolly v. Warren, 106 Mass. 146; Mun- 
ster V, South Eastern R. Co., 4 C. R (N. S.) 676 ; S. C. 4 Jur. (N. 
S.) 738 ; 27 L. J. (C. P.) 308 ; Duffy v. Thompson, 4 E. D. Smith, 178 ; 
Doyle V. Kiser, 6 Ind. 242 ; Dibble v. Brown, 12 Ga. 217 ; Baltimore, 
etc., R. Co. V, Smith, 23 Md. 402; Woods z'. Devin, 13 111. 746; Chi- 
cago, etc., R. Co. V. Collins, 56 111. 212 ; Davis v, Michigan, etc., R. Co., 
22 III. 278 ; Van Horn v. Kermit, 4 E. D. Smith, 454 ; Hawkins v. Hoff- 
man, 6 Hill, 586 ; Davis v, Cayuga, etc., R. Co., 10 How. Pr. 330 ; Hop- 
kins V, Westcott, 6 Blatchf. 64 ; Hannibal, etc., R. Co. v. Swift, 
12 Wall. 262; Toledo, etc., R. Co. v, Hammond, 33 Ind. 379; 
Porter v, Hildebrand, 14 Pa. St. 129. 

In notice. Beck man v. Shouse, 5 Rawle, 179 (28 Am. Dec. 653) ; 
Dwight V. Brewster, i Pick. 150; Camden, etc., R. Co., v, Baldauf, 
16 Pa. St. 67. 



and effisots. In statute. Cross v, Wilkins, 43 N. H. 336. 



BAIIiEE. 



BATLHENT. 



BAinNG. 
BAItAIi'CE. 



BAI.AKCSD. 
BAIaAirCES. 
BAI.E. 



In statute, Reg. v. Hunt, 8 Cox C. C. 495 ; People v. Cohen, 8 Cal. 
42; Reg. V, Denmour, 8 Cox C. C. 440; Reg. v, Robson, 9 Cox C. 
C. 29; Reg. V, Hassell, 8 Cox C. C. 491 ; Reg. v, Hoare, i F. & F. 
647; Reg. V, Reeves, 5 Jur. (N. S.) 716; Becker v. Smith, 9 Smith 
(Pa.), 469; Reg. V, Loose, Bell C. C. 259; Reg. v. Bunkall, 9 Cox C. 
C.419; Reg. V, Davis, 14 W. R. 679; Hunt v, Wyman, 100 Mass. 198; 
People V, Poggi, 19 Cal. 600; People v. Cohen, 8 Cal. 43. 

In statute, Tarrant v. Baker, 14 C. B. 1 19. 

Mallory |z/. Willis, 4 N. Y. 76 ; Marsh v, Titus. 6 Thomp. & C. 29 ; 3 
Hun, 550. 

In statute. People v, Poggi, 19 Cal. 600; People v, Cohen, 8 Cal. 43, 

In statute. Pitts v. Millar, L. R., 9 Q. B. 381. 

Townson v. Jackson, 13 M. & W. 374. 

In statute, Reynolds v. Walker, 29 Miss. 250; London Union v. 
Acocks, 8 C. B. (N. S.) 780. 

of money. In statute. Brown v, Mullins, 24 Miss. 204. 

of my estate. In will. Walker v. Parker, 13 Pet. 166. ' 

of probabilitieB. In instruction. Haskins v. Haskins, 9 Gray, 391. 

of the aoeouzit. In statute. Henderson v, Eason, 17 Q. B. 712. 

on of aooounts. Inguaranty, Oldershaw v. King, 2 Hurl. & N. 

403 ; id. 524. 

In statute. Finney v, Tootel, 5 C. B. 508. 

In bond. Pattison v. Guardians, i Hurl. & N. 524. 

In contract. Taylor v. Briggs, 2 C. & P. 525. 



T'^ 



BALES. 36 BANKERS. 

BALES. of gambler. In contracL Gorrissen v, Perrin, 2 C. B. (N. S.) 681 . 

ootton in . In charter-party, Taylor v, Briggs, 2 C. & P. 525. 

BATiTiABT. Insurance Co. v, Thwing. 13 Wall. 674. 

BAIiIiBT. d'aotioii. Wigan v. Strange, L. R., i C. P. 176. 

diTertisaement. Wigan v. Strange, L. R., i C. P. 176. 

BALLOT. People v, Holden, 19 Cal. 600. 

In constitution. Opinion of the Justices, 7 Me. 414; Williams v. 
Stern, 38 Ind. 89. 

BALUBTRADES. In statute. Gushing v. Boston, 128 Mass. 330. 

Oultonz^. Saving Institution, 17 Wall. 109; States/. Louisiana Saving 
Co., 12 La. Ann. 568; New York Fireman Ins. Co. v, Ely, 2 Cow. 
678 ; State v, Helmes, 3 N. J. (L.) 764, 

In promissory note. Way v, Butterworth, 108 Mass. 510; 106 Mass. 75. 

In statute. Way v, Butterworth, 106 Mass. 75 ; Re Leavenworth Sav- 
ings Bk., 14 B. R. 92 ; Ohio Life Ins. Co. v, Debolt, 16 How. 416. 

bill. In indictment. Eastman v. Com.. 4 Gray, 416; Com. «/. 

Stebbins, 8 Gray, 493; Com. v. Grimes, 10 Gray, 470; State v. 
Happe, 39 Iowa, 468; State v. Hays, 21 Ind. 176; Low v. People, 2 
Park. C. C. 37 ; Com. v, Clancey, 7 Allen, 537 ; Townsend v. Peo- 
ple, 4 Tel. 328. 

bill or note. In indictment. Com. v. Rand, 7 Mete. 475 ; State 

V. Stimson, 4 Zab. 9. 

bill orpromissory note. In statute. State v, Wilkins, 17 Vt. 151. 

money. Hapson v. Fountain, 5 Humph. 140. 

note. In statute, Williams v. Amis, 30 Tex. 37; Eastman v. 

Com., 4 Gray, 416; State v. Hays, 21 Ind. 176 ; Com. v, Stebbins, 8 
Gray, 493 ; Low v. People, 2 Park. C. C. 37 ; James v, Rogers, 23 
Ind. 451. 

of the oreek. In deed, Hasley v, McCormick, 13 N. Y. 296. 

of the river. Indeed, McCollugh v, Wainwright, 14 Pa. St. 

171; Dunlap V, Stetson, 4 Mason, 349; Luce v, Carley. 24 Wend. 
451; Luntz'. Holland, 14 Mass. 150; Pulley v, Muncipality, 18 La. 
278; Stone V, Augusta, 46 Me. 127; Howard v, Ingersoll, 13 How. 

381. 
or company engaged in the buednefls of banking. In statute. 



Bank v. Collector, 3 Wall. 495. 

any other . In statute, Campbell v. Farmers' Bk., 10 Bush, 152. 

inoorporated . In statute. Com. v, Tenney, 97 Mass. 50. 

on the . In deed, Halsey v, McCormack, 13 N. Y. 296. 

on the weet . In deed, Caldwell's Case, 19 Wall. 264. 

BAITEEB. Bank!/. The Collector, 3 Wall. 495; Curtis v, Leavitt, 15 N. Y. 167; 

People V, Utica Ins. Co., 15 Johns. 358; Lowry v. Commercial, etc.. 
Bank, Taney, 312; Hinckley v, Belleville, 43 III. 183; Warren v. 
Shook, I Otto, 708. 

BAJMJiJSAS. In statute. Exchange Bank v, Hines, 3 Ohio St. i ; Bemasconi v. Fare- 
brother, 10 B. & C. 554. 

In will. Goblet v, Beechy, 3 Sim. 24. 

doing business as brokers. In statute, U. S. v, Fisk, 3 Wall. 

445' 



BANKING. 



37 



BARRATRY. 



hours. Parker v. Gordon, 7 East, 385; Jameson v, Swinton, a 



BANEBXTPT. 



Taunt. 225 ; Hare v, Henty, 10 C. B. (N. S.) 65 ; Calisher v. Forbes, 
41 L. J. (Ch.) 56; Salt Springs Nat. Bank v. Burton, 58 N. Y. 430; 
Marshall v, American Ex. Co., 7 Wis. 3. 

engaged in the bnainess of . In statute. Bank v. Collector, 3 

Wall. 495. 

law. Vanuxem v, Hazlehurst, i South. 192 (7 Am. Dec. 582); 



Martin v. Berry, 37 Cal. 208 ; Adams «. Storey, i Paine, 80. 

beoome and diaoontanue business. In resolution of corporation. 

Barr v, Bartram, etc., Co., 41 Conn. 502. 

Sturges f/. Crowninshield, 4 Wheat. 122; re Black, 2 Ben. 196; 
Sackett v. Andross, 5 Hill, 327 ; ex parte Breneman, Crabbe, 456. 

act of . Maltbie v, Hotchkiss, 38 Conn. 80. 

adjudioation of . In statute. Re Morse, 17 Blatchf. 74. 

contemplation of . In statute, Peckham v. Burrows, 3 Story, 

544 ; Morse v, Godfrey, 3 Story, 364 ; Everett v. Stone, 3 Story, 446; 
Winsor v, Kendall, 3 Story, 507, 

Lionberger v. Rouse, 9 Wall. 468. 

In constitution. Bank of Sonoma v, Fairbanks, 52 Cal. 196. 

In statute, Monmouthshire Canal Co. v. Hill, 4 Hurl. & N. 426; Ben- 
nett V, Morta, Holt, N. P. 360, 

trustee. In statute, Morgan v, Swansea U. S. Authority, 27 W^ 

R. 283. 

Sage V. Wilcox, 6 Conn. 81. 

In statute, Packard v. Richardson, 7 Mass. 122 (8 Am. Dec. 123); 
Egerton v, Mathews, 6 East, 307. 

sell, release qnit-daim and oonvey. In deed. Gibson v, 

Chouteau, 39 Mo. 536. 

In insurance policy, Steinhoffz/. Royal Canadian Ins. Co., 42 U. C. Q. 
B. 307. 

In statute. The Mamie, 5 Fed. Rep. 820. 
BAB-KEEPEB. Boniface v, Scott, 3 S. & R. 351. 

SAB-IBON. In insurance policy, Evans v. Commercial, etc., Ins. Co., 6 R. I. 47. 
•RARTiBY. first quality dear . In contract, Robinson v, U. S., 13 Wall. 363. 

stack of . In indictment. Rex v, Swatkins, 4 C. & P. 548. 



BABS. 



SABK. 



BABBATOB. 



BABBATBY. 



State V, Wolfenberger, 20 Ind. 242 ; Ellsmore v. Inhabitants, 8 B. & C. 
645 ; Ratekin v. State, 26 Ohio St. 420 ; State v. Cherry, 63 N. C. 
493; State V, Laughlin, 8 Jones (L.), 354; State t/. Jim, 8 Jones (L.), 
459; State V, Shaw, 31 Me. 250; People v, Taylor, 2 Mich. 250. 

common • Com. v, Davis, 11 Pick. 432 ; Com. v. Pray, 13 Pick. 

359; Com. V. Mohun, 52 Pa. St. 243; Com. v, McCulloch, 15 Mass. 
227 ; State v, Chitty, i Bailey, 379. 

Thallhimer v, Brinckerhoflf, 3 Cow. 623 (15 Am. Dec. 308). 

In bill of lading, Taylor v, Liverpool Steam. Co., L. R., 9 Q. B. 546. 

In marine policy. Waters v. Merchants' Ins. Co., 11 Peters, 213; Pa. 
tapsco Ins. Co. v. Coulter, 3 Peters, 222 ; Hood v, Nesbet. 2 Dall. 
137; Crousellat v. Ball, 4 Dall. 294; Marcardier v. Chesapeake Ins. 
Co., 8 Cranch, 39; Wilson v. General Mut. Ins. Co., 12 Cush. 360; 
Lawtonv. Sun Mutual Ins. Co.. 5 Cush. 500; Atkinson t/. Great 
Western Ins. Co., 4 Daly, i ; Brown v. Union Ins. Co., 5 Day, i ; 
Stone V, National Ins. Co., 19 Pick. 34; Greene v. Pacific Mut. Ins. 



BARRATRY. 



38 



BEAST. 



BARRKTi, 



BASTABD. 



BABBATBY — Continued. 

Co., 9 Allen, 127 ; Dufourz^. Camfranc 11 Mart. 607 ; Koster v. Reed, 
6 B. & C. 22 ; Cook v. Commercial Ins. Co., 1 1 Johns. 40 ; Busk v. 
Assurance Co., 2 B. & Aid. So; Millandon v. New Orleans Ins. Co., 
II Mart, 602 (13 Am. Dec. 358); Dederer t/. Delaware Ins. Co., i 
Wash. 61 ; Hucks v. Thornton, Holt. N. P. 34. 

In statute. Grill v. Screw Co., L. R., 3 C. P. 476, 

State V. Moore, 1 1 Ired. (L.) 70. 

In contract. Miller v, Stevens, 100 Mass. 518 ; Clark v. Pinney, 7 Cow. 
681. 

In writ, Gardner v. Lane, 9 Allen, 492. 

U. S. V. Morel, 13 Am. Jur. 279. 

Timmins v. Lacy, 30 Tex. 115; Stikes v, Swanson, 44 Ala. 633. 

Respublica z/. Delangchamps, i Dall. 114; Cole t^. Turner, 6 Mod. 149; 
Reg. V, Cotesworth, 6 Mod. 172 ; James v, Campbell, 5 C. & P. 372; 
Ford V, Skinner, 4 C. & P. 239; Pursell v. Horn, 8 Ad.& £11. 604; 
Dodwell V, Burford, i Mod. 24 ; Hopper v. Reeve, 7 Taunt. 698 ; 
Griffin v. Coleman, 4 Hurl. A N. 265 ; Wright v. Court, 4 B. & C. 
596 ; Coward v, Baddeley, 4 H. & N. 481 ; Williams v. Jones, Hard. 
301 ; Fitzgerald v, Cavin, no Mass. 153; Com. v, Ruggles, 6 Allen, 
588; Kirland z>. State, 43 Ind. 146; Johnson v. State, 35 Ala. 363; 
Johnson v. State, 17 Tex. 615 ; U. S. v. Ortega, 4 Wash. C. C. $54; 
State V. Baker, 65 N. C. 322; Bull v. Colton, 22 Barb. 94; Wiffin v. 
Kincard, 2 B. & P. 472 ; Reg. v. Day, i Cox C. C. 207 ; State v. 
Prather, 54 Ind. 63. 

U. S. V, Morel, 13 Am. Jur. 279. 

or harbor. In deed, Niles v. Patch, 13 Gray, 257. 

offered. In offer of reward. Freeman v. City of Boston, 5 Mete 

S8. 

advanced or to advanced. In guaranty. Bell v. Welch, 9 C. B 

166. 

shall . In statute. Boisdere v. Citizens* Bank, 9 La. 506 (29 Am. 

Dec. 453). 
Merwin v, Wheeler, 41 Conn. 14; Littlefield v, Littlefield, 28 Me. 180; 

Hodge V, Boothby, 48 Me. 68; Cutts v, Hussey, 15 Me. 237; East 

Hampton v. Kirk, 13 N. Y. (S. C.) 257 ; Doane v. Wilcutt, 13 Gray, 

328. 

In deed, Niles v. Patch, 13 Gray, 254. 

for drift wood and timber. In will. Brown v. Lakeman, 17 

Pick. 444 (28 Am. Dec. 315). 

Faulkner v. Upper Boddington, 3 C. B. (N. S.) 412. 
In statute. Rex. v. Woodward, i Moody, 323. 

In note. Mechanics* Bank v, Straiton, 3 Keyes, 365 ; 5 Abb. Pr. (N. S.) 
1 1 ; Cocks V, Fellows, i Johns. 143. 

payable to . In statute, Cheetham v. Butler, 5 B. & Adol. 838. 

even date. In statute. Wood v. Norton, 9 B. & C. 887. 

interest. In note, Kennerly v, Nash, i Stark. 452. 

the surname of. In will, Luscombe v, Yeates, 5 B. & Aid. 556. 

In statute. Rex v, Mulreaty, i Russ., Cr. & M. 938 ; Taylor v. State, 6 

Humph. 285 ; State v, Pearce, Peck, 66. 
domestic . In statute. State v, Enslow, 10 Iowa. 115. 



BEADSMAET. 
BEAKS. 

bbarkic. 



BEABING. 



BEAST. 



LEASTS. 



39 



BEING. 



BEASTS. 
BEAT. 



other 



In statute, U. S. v. Gideon, i Minn. 292. 



-.iZ^AA 



BEEB. 



Ryan v. Judd, 7 Mo. (App.) 74 ; Reg. v. Hale, 2 C. & K. 326. 

In indictment. Com. v, McClellan, loi Mass. 344 

any horse. In statute. State v, Avery, 44 N. H. 395. 

an hataitaal drankarcL In statute, Porritt v, Porritt, 16 Mich. 

140. 

at the time he bankrupt. In statute, Fawcett if. Feme, 6 Q. 

B. 19. 

go to with. In slander, Walton v. Singleton, 7 S. & R. 451 (10 

Am. Dec. 472). 

Mayor v. Davis, 6 W. & S. 279. 

In indictment. Moore v. State, 2 Tex. (App.) 350. 

Nevin v, Ladue, 3 Denio, 437 ; People v, Wheelock, 3 Park. C. C. 9 ; 
Excise Comm'rs v, Taylor, 21 N. Y. 173 ; People v, Crilley, 20 Barb. 
246. 

In statute. Read v. Story, 6 Hurl. & N. 427 ; People v. Hart, 24 How. 
Pr. 289. 

ahop, Indeed, Wilson v. Hart, L. R., i Ch. App. 463; Bishop 

of St. Albans v, Battersby, 26 W. R. 679. 

In statute, Hartford Ins. Co. v. State, 9 Kas. 260. 

oonviotion. In statute. State v, Lewis, 19 Kas. 260. 

final hearing or triaL In statute, Bryant v. Rich, 106 Mass. 192. 

or at the time. In shipping contract. Rice v,Yi,V, R. R., 63 

Mo. 314. 

the sheriff and auitora. In plea. Jones v. Jones, 5 M. & W. 



SEOJLNEUNG". 



524. 

— the wind. In statute. The Fashion v. Wards, 6 McLean, 152. 

—triaL In statute, Winship v. State, 51 111. 296; Horner v, Pilk- 
ington, II Ind. 440; St. Anthony Falls Water Power Co. v. King, 
etc.. Bridge, 23 Minn. 186. 

— Ibr ahna or Bolioiting oharity. In statute. Re Haller, 3 Abb. 
N. C. 65. 

— with the elder. In will, Windt v, Windt, L. R.. i H. L. Zt, 

to keep his house to the intent to delay oreditors. In 



BEGOTTEN. 
SEGUE. 



BEHAU. 
BEHAVIOB. 

BEIEG. 



statute, Harvey v, Ramsbottom, i B. & C. 59 ; Dudley v, Vaughan, 
I Camp. 271. 

In will. Doe v, Prevoost, 4 Johns. 61 (4 Am. Dec. 249). 

matters or things or made. In statute, Felkin v, Berridge, 

15 C. B. (N. S.) 260. 

Richerson v, Sternburg, 65 111. 272. 

breach of good . In constitution. State v. Bell, 2 Mart (N. S.) 

699. 

-in advanoe. In contract, Haigh v. Brooks, 10 Ad. & Ell. 309. 

married. In statute, Murray v. Queen, 7 Q. B. 700; Queen v, 

Allen, L. R., i C. C. R. 371. 

the same premises. Lovejoy v, Lovett, 124 Mass. 270 ; Am mi- 



down V, Granite Bank, 8 Allen, 285; Auburn Congregational 
Church V, Walker, 124 Mass. 69. 

threatened. In statute. Baker v. State. 49 Ala. 350. 

fbr the time . In statute. King v, Devonshire, i B. & C. 618. 



BELIEF. 40 BEQ UEA THED. 

BELLEF. Hatch v. Carpenter, 9 Gray, 271. 

In statute. Humphreys v, McCall, 9 Cal. 62. 
BEIdJSVJSi. Com? v. Lottery Tickets, 5 Cush. 374 ; Re Fitch, 2 Wend. 298. 

from the evidenoe. State v, 0*Hagan, 38 Iowa, 504. 

BSLUailBSNT. foroes. In life insurance policy. Welts v. Conn. Mat Life 

Ins. Co.. 48 N. Y. 36. 

BELLIQEBENTB. Johnson v. Jones, 44 111. 142. 

BELONGED. Spear v. Hooper, 22 Pick. 144. 

BELONaiNa. In statute. Reading v. Westport, 19 Conn. 561 ; Columbia v. Williams, 

3 Conn. 467. 

thereto. In deed. Cort v. Sagar, 3 Hurl. & N. 372. 

to exhibitors. In insurance policy. Mayor v. Hamilton Fire 

Ins. Co., 10 Bosw. 537. 

money to the State. In bond. Gilbert v. Isham, 16 Conn. 526. 

stables to the said premises . In deed. Martland v. Mackinnon^ 

I H. & C. 610. 

BELONGKI. In statute. Reading v. Westport, 19 Conn. 561. 

town to which he . In statute. Hampden v. Newbuigh, 67 Me. 

370. 

BENEFIdAIi. In statute. Reg. z^. InhabiUnts, 3 Q. B. 250; Cutting v. Cutting, 20 

Hun, 360. 

^devises. In statute. Sullivan v. Sullivan, 106 Mass. 474 (8 Am. 

Rep. 356). 

e]\|oyment. In statute. Att'y-^^n. v. Sefton, 11 H. L. Cas. 357 ; 

3 H. & C. 1024. 

BBNEFIOIAIiLY. In statute. Reg. v. St. Leonards, 13 Q. B. 971. 

BENEFIT. In contract. Re Hutchins, 4 Q. B. Div. 483. 

of his ohildren. In will. Re Pocock's Policy, L. R., 6 Ch. App. 

445- 
^ of law. In statute. Hewitt v. Wilcox, i Mete. 154. 



of salvage. In contract. Allkins v. Jupe, 2 C. P. Div. 390. 

for the of. In will. Clark v. Maguire, 16 Mo. 302. 

fbrthe of my daughter and her ohildren. In will. Re Pal- 
mer, 3 Hurl. & N. 30. 

BENEFITS. of all my real estate. In will. Re McCullough, 4 Yeates, 23 

BENEVOLENCE. In will. Rotch v. Emerson, 105 Mass. 431. 

BENEVOLENT. Norris v. Thompson, 19 N. J. (L.) 307 ; Thompson v. Norris, 20 N. 

J. (L.) 489; Adye v. Smith, 44 Conn. 70. 

• institutions. In statute. Indianapolis v. Grand Master, 25 Ind. 

518. 

or charitable. Sheren v. Mendenhall, 23 Minn. 92. 

purposes. In will. Chamberlain v. Steams, in Mass. 267. 



missionary, eduoational and enterprises. In will. DeCamp 

V. Dobbins, 29 N. J. (Eq.) 36. 

BEQUEATH. Dow v. Dow, 36 Me. 211 ; Ladd v. Harvey, 21 N. H. 514; Lasher v* 

Lasher, 13 Barb. 106. 

In statute. Barry v. Barry, 1 5 Kas. 387. 
BEQUEATBDBD. In will Laing v. Barbour, 119 Mass. 523. 



BEQ UESTS, 41 B I EN N I ALL K 



BEQUESTS. In will. White v. Lake» L. R., 6 £q. Cas. i88. 

BEBBIES. nuts and vegetables used prinoipally in dyeing or oompoe-^ 

ing dyes. In statute, Schneider v. Lawrence, 3 Blatchf. 115. 

— evidence. State v, McDonald, 65 Me. 466. 

— E. X. f. f. madder. In contract, Dane v, Fiedler, i E. D. Smithy 
463. 

— of his ability. In bond. Union v. Smith, 39 Iowa, 9. 

— of his belief. In affidavit. Roe t/. Brad sh aw, L. R., i Ex. 107. 
of his knowledge and belief. Hall v. Wood, i Paige, 405 ; 



Sloan V, Little, 3 Paige, 103. 

oiL In contract. Lucas v. Bristowe, El. B. & El. 908. 

you oan« In order, Marland v, Stanwood, loi Mass. 470. 

HESTIAUTY. Rex v, Mulreaty, i Russ., C. & M. 938; Ausman v. Veal, 10 Ind. 356. 

BET. States. Welch, 7 Port. 463; Shumate's Case, 15 Gratt. 653; Wood- 

cock V, McQueen, 1 1 Ind. 14. 

In statute. Bone v. State, 63 Ala. 185 ; O'Blennis v. State, 12 Mo. 3n. 

BETTER. legal and panunoiint title. In statute, McConnell v, Wilcox, 

2 111. 344, 

BETTING. on the sides or hands of sudh as do or shall play. In statute 

Pugh V, Jenkins, i Q. B. 332. 

with a ooin. In statute. Hirst v, Molesbury, L. R., 6 Q. B. 130. 

BETWEEN. Wood v, Tomkins, 30 N. J. (Eq.) 3 ; Delaware, etc., R. Co. v, Raritan, 

16 N. J. (Eq.) 321 ; Morris, etc., R. Co. v. Central R. Co., 31 N. J. 
(L.) 205 ; Revere v. Leonard, i Mass. 91 ; Doddridge v, Thompson, 9 
Wheat. 469; State z/. Godfrey, 12 Me. 361 ; Fowler v, Rigney, 5 Abb. 
Pr. (N. S.) 182; Bunce v. Reed, 16 Barb. 347; Harrold z/. Corpora- 
tion, 16 U. C. C. P. 43; Harrold v. Corporation, 18 U. C. C. P. 9; 
Atkins V, Boyleston Ins. Co., 5 Met. 439 ; Kendall v, Kinysley, 120 
Mass. 95. 

In will, Attorney-General z/. Fletcher, L. R., 13 Eq. Cas. 128 ; Haskell 
V, Sargeant, 113 Mass. 341. 

now and the first day of September. In contract, Richardson 

V, Ford, 14 111. 332 ; Cook v. Gray, 6 Ind. 335. 

seas. In statute, Keeton v, Keeton, 20 Mo. 530 ; Shrevc v, Whittel- 

sey, 7 Mo. 473 ; Facklerz/. Fackler, 14 Mo. 433 ; Bedford v, Bradford, 8 
Mo. 233 ; Marvin v. Bates, 13 Mo. 218 ; Pike t/. Green, i Yerg. 465 ; 
Forbes v. Foot, 2 McCord, 331 (13 Am. Dec. 732); Mason v^ 
Johnson, 24 111. 159; Fawz/. Roberdeau, 3 Cranch, 174; Murray v^ 
Baker, 3 Wheat. 541 ; Shelby v. Guy, 1 1 Peters, 366 ; Davie v, Briggs, 
97 U. S. 628 ; Brent v, Tasker, i Harr. & McH. 89 ; Bank of Alex- 
andria V, Dyer, 14 Peters, 141 ; Pancoast v, Addison, i Harr. & J. 
350(2 Am. Dec 251); Denham v, Holeman, 26 Ga. 182; Galusha 
V, Cobleigh, 13 N. H. 79; Ward v. Cole, 32 N. H. 452; White v. 
Bailey, 3 Mass. 271 ; Byrne v. Crown in shield, i Pick. 263; Whitney 
V, Goddard, 20 Pick. 304; Ward v, Hallam, 2 Dall. 217; Thurston 
V, Dawes, 9 S. & R. 288; Musson v. Johnson, 24 111. 159; Whitlock 
V, Walton, 2 Murph. 23 ; Earle v, Dickson, i Dev. 16 ; Darling v. 
Meacham, 2 G. Greene, 602 ; Lane v, Bennett, 5 M. & W. 71. 

the CSape of Good Hope. In statute, Hadden v. Collector, s 

Wall. 107. 

payments. In will, Lyman v. Parsons, 26 Conn. 494. 

AltLY, In statute. People v, Kilbourn, 68 N. Y. 479. 

6 



; I ■ ^ ' 



Hic-iv^ 



BIG, 42 BILLS' 

BIG. with ohllcL In indictment. Com. v, Parker, 9 Met 600 ; and 

sec Hall v, Hancock, 15 Pick. 255 (26 Am. Dec. 599). 

she is . In slander. Watts v, Greenlee, 2 Dev. (L.) 1 16. 

BIGAMY. Scroggins v. State, 32 Ark. 205. 

In statute, Beggs v. State, 55 Ala. 108. 

BHiL. obligatory. Farmers, etc., Bk. v, Greiner, 2 S. & R. 114. 

of exoeptions. Haraszthy v. Horton, 46 Cal. 545. 

In statute. People v, Lee, 14 Cal. 510. 

of exohange. Luff v. Pope, 5 Hill, 413; 7 Hill 577; Auerbach 

V, Pritchett, 58 Ala. 451 ; Jarvis v, Wilson, 46 Conn. 91. 

In indictment, Reg. v, Curry, 2 Moody, 218; Reg. v. Smith, 2 Moody, 
295 ; Reg. V, Wicks, Russ. & Ry. 149; Reg. v. Hart, 6 C. & P. 106; 

Reg. V, Randall, Russ. & Ry. 195; People v, Howell, 4 Johns. 296; 
Com. V, Butterick, 100 Mass. 12. 

of exchange expressed to be fbr value received. In statute. 

Sawyer v. Page, 24 Mo. 595. 

--of lading. Lickbarrow v. Mason, 2 T. R. 63; Mason v, Lickbar- 
row, I H. Bl. 359; Sack v. Ford, 13 C. B. (N. S.) 100; Bryans v. 
Nix, 4 M. & W. 775 ; Jenkyns v, Osborne. 7 M. & G. 678 ; The May 
Flower, 3 Ware, 300 ; Wolfe v, Myers, 3 Sandf. 7 ; The Thames, 14 
Wall. 105 ; Grace v, Adams, 100 Mass. 505 ; The Delaware, 14 Wall. 
600; O'Brien v, Gilchrist, 34 Me. 588; Wayland v, Mosely, 5 Ala. 
430; Ho] brook v, Vose, 6 Bosw. 76; Dows v, Greene, 32 Barb. 490; 
Gage V, Jacqueth, i Lans. 207 ; Dows v, Perrin, 16 N. Y. 328 ; Rawls 
V, Deshler, 4 Abb. Ct. App. 12; Dickerson v, Seelye, 12 Barb. 99; 
Covin V, Hill, 4 Denio, 330; McCants v. Wells, 4 Rich. (S. C.) 381 ; 
The Water Witch, 1 Black, 494 ; Saltus v, Everett, 20 Wend. 267 ; 
Decan v. Shipper, 35 Pa. St. 239; Stanton v. Eager, 16 Pick. 467; 
Rowland v, Bigelow, 12 Pick. 307 (23 Am. Dec. 607). 

In statute, Cornell v, Hal, 6 N. Y. 374, 

of particulars. In statute, Welles z/. Allen, 41 Conn. 40 ; Stark- 
weather V, Kittle, 17 Wend. 20. 

of peace. Earl of Bath v. Sherwin, 10 Mod. i ; i Brown's Pari. 

Cas. 266; Eldridge v. Hill, 2 Johns. Ch. 281 ; Alexander v, Pendle- 
ton, 8 Cranch, 462 ; Sheffield Water- Works Co. v, Yeomans, L. R., 
2 Ch. App. 8 ; Phillips v, Hudson, L. R., 2 Ch. App. 242 ; Bond zf. 
Little, 10 Ga. 395; Dedman v. Chiles, 37 B. Mon. 426; Gunn v, 
Harrison, 7 Ala. 585. 

of review. Wickliffe v. Eve, 17 How. 468. 

of revivor and supplement. Bowie v, Minter, 2 Ala. 406. 

of sale. In statute, Allsopp v. Day, 7 Hurl. & N. 462. 

or note. In statute, Lavitt v, Blatchford, 17 N. Y. 521 ; Oneida 

Bk. v.. Ontario Bk., 21 N. Y. 490. 

quia timet. Tipping v, Eckersley, 3 K. & J. 264; Randolph v, 

Kinney, 3 Rand. 394; Sanderson v, Jones, 6 Fla. 430; Green v. 
Hankinson, Walk. (Mich.) 487. 

single. In statute, Horton v. State, 53 Ala. 489. 



aooommodation . Perry v, Crammond, i Wash. loi. 

creditors . In statute, Newman v, Willetts, 52 111. 98. 

In constitution. People v, Wallace, 70 111. 600 ; People v, Wright, 70 
111. 388; Nowack 7/. Excelsior Stone Co., 'jZ 111. 307. 



BILLS. 



43 



BL UBBER. 



— Continued. 



— of attainder. In constitution. Pierce v, Carskadon, 16 Wall* 
234; ex parte Law, 35 Ga. 285. 

— of credit. In constitution. Briscoe v. Bank of Commonwealth, 



II Pet. 257 ; Darrington v. Bank, 13 How. 12 ; Craig v. State, 4 Pet. 
410; Owen V. Branch Bank, 3 Ala. 258; Breitenbach v. Turner, 18 
Wis. 146; Linn v. State Bank, i Scam. 87 (25 Am. Dec. 78); Hale 
V, Huston, 44 Ala. 134; Briscoe v. Bank, 7 J. J. Marsh. 349; Jones 
V. Bank, 8 B. Mon. 122; Lampton v. Bank, 2 Litt. 301 ; Bank z^. 
Swindler, 2 Dana, 393; Bank v, Spilman, 3 Dana, 150; Manstert/. 
State, I Mo. 452 ; Loper v. State, i Mo. 633 ; Bank of Kentucky v. 
Clark, 4 Mo. 59; Bailey v. Milner, 35 Ga. 330. 

— of exchange. In statute. Eyre v. Walker, 5 Hurl. & N. 460. 



BINDING. 



BIRD. 



the . Indeed. Kearney z/. West Granada Mining Co;, i Hurl.&N.4i2. 

In statute. Holmes v. Taunton, 5 El. & Bl. 78. 

final and oonoltuuve. In statute. King v. Justices, i B. & C. 



(^1^ 



of game. In statute. Loome v. Barley, 3 El. & El. 448. 
of warren. Duke of Devonshire v. Lodge, 7 B. & C. 39. 



BITCH. 



In statute. Reg. v. Archbishop of Canterbury, 6 El. & Bl. 564. 

K. V. H., 20 Wis. 239; Riddell v. Thayer, 127 Mass. 487. 

In statute. Van Camp v. Board of Education, 9 Ohio St. 406. 

Indian and white person. In statute. People v. Hall, 4 Cal. 

402. 

Barnett v. Allen, 3 Hurl. & N. 376. 

BIiAGKUAIIi. Edsall v. Brooks, 17 Abb. Pr. 221 ; 2 Robt. 29 ; Life Association of 

America v. Boogher, 3 Mo. (App.) 173. 

Rex V. Atwood, Cro. Jac. ; Rex v. Taylor, Vent. 293 ; Rex v. Woolstan, 
2 Strange, 834; Rex v. Curl, 2 Strange, 789; Rex v, Annett, 2 
Burn. C. L. 217 ; Rex v, Carlile, 3 B. & Aid. 161 ; Gathercole's Case, 
2 Lew. C. C. 237; Reg. v. Waddington, i B. & C.'26; Peoples. 
Ruggles, 8 Johns. 290 ; Updegraff v. Com., 1 1 S. & R. 394 ; State v. 
Chandler, 2 Harr. (Del.) 553; Com. v, Kneeland, 20 Pick. 211. 

In contract, Thompson v, Galloupe, 100 Mass. 435 ; Harrington v, 
Fitchburg Ins. Co., 124 Mass. 120. 

The Peterhoft, 5 Wall. 28; The Circassian, 2 Wall. 135; The Vrow 
Judeth, I Rob. (Adm.) 126; U. S. v. The William Arthur, 3 Ware. 
276. 

porta excepted. In marine policy, Yeaton v. Fry, 5 Cranch, 333. 

of 8U0h ancestor. In statute, Beebe v, Gufiing, 14 N. Y. 235. 

of the . In statute. Cuttler v, Wadingham, 22 Mo. 206; Den v, 

Jones, 8 N. J. (L.) 346. 

of the of another. In statute. Gardner v, Collins, 2 Pet. 58. 

of the of the person on whom such estate came or descended. 

In statute, Gardner v, Collins, 2 Pet. 58. 

of the half . Baker v. Chalfant, 5 Whart. 477 \ Oglesby Canal Co. 

V. Pasco, 79 111. 164. 

of the whole . Baker v. Chalfant, 5 Whart. 477. 

to with. In deed. Lincoln v. Lincoln, 1 10 Mass. 449. 



BLOOD. 



BIiOW. 
BliXTmiJSJbC. 



Rogers v. Mechanics' Ins. Co., i Story,* 603. 



BOARD. 



44 



BOND. 



BOAT, 



BOABB. In indictment. Queen v. McQuarrie, 22 U. C. (Q. B.) 660. 

In statute. Barker z/. Allen, 5 Hurl. & N. 71 ; Scattergood z/. Water- 
man, 2 Miles, 323; Comm'rs v. Reisner, 58 Ind. 260. 

of exfuniiiers. Reed v. Town of Sharon, 35 Conn. 191. 

BOABBEB. Shoecraftz/. Bailey, 25 Iowa, 553; Berkshire Woolen Co. v. Proctor^ 

7 Cush. 423. 

BOABDINGfr-HOnSE* Pinkerton v. Woodward, 33 Cal. 557 ; Willard v. Reinhardt, 

2 E. D. Smith, 148; Dausey z/. Richardson, 2 El. & Bl. 144; Cady v. 
McDowell, I Lans. 486 ; Beall v. Beck, 3 Cranch C. C, 666. 

In lease. Gamett v. Albree, 103 Mass. 374. 

keepers. In statute. Cross v. Wilkins, 43 N. H. 336; Stewart 

V. McC ready, 24 How. Pr. 62. 

In insurance policy. Blackett v. Royal Exchange Ass. Co., 2 Cromp» 
& J. 244; (Lawson's Usages and Customs, 413). 

In statute. Barge Resort v. Brooke, 10 Mo. 531 ; Tisdell v. Combe, 7 
Ad. & El. 797; U. S. v. An Open Boat, 5 Mason, 120; Northup v. 
The Pilot, 6 Oregon, 297. 

risk of so fiur as ships are liable thereto. In bill of lading. 

Johnson V. Benson, 4 Moore, 90. 

In indictment. People v. Graves, 5 Park. C. C. 134. 

oorporate. In statute. Com. v. Beamish, 81 Pa, St 389. 

of the oounty. Fizell v. State, 25 Wis. 367; U. S. v. Grush, 5 

Mason, 290. 

upon the . In indictment. Sanchez v. People, 22 N. Y. 147. 

In deed. Mulcany v. Eyres, Cro. Car. 511. 

tea. In statute. Two Hundred Chests of Tea, 9 Wheat. 430. 

engine^ machinery and belting. In insurance policy. James 

River Ins. Co. v. Merritt, 47 Ala. 387. 

bursting of • In policy of insurance. Rae v. Columbus Ins. Co.» 

17 Mo. 301 ; McAllister v. Tenn. Ins. Co., 17 Mo. 306; Montgomery 
V. Fireman's Ins. Co., 16 B. Mon. 442. 

two . In contract. James v. Bostwick, Wright (Ohio), 143. 

Ballinger v. Ferris, i M. & W. 628. 

In plea. Uther v. Rich, 10 Ad. & Ell. 785. 

In statute. Robinson v. Vale, 2 B. & C. 763. 

executed. In plea. Belcher v. Magnay, 7 M. & W. 102. 

pre-emptio9 claimants. In statute. Hosmer v. Wallace, 7 Otto» 

580. 



BOATS. 



BODY. 



BOG. 



BOH 



BOILEBS. 



BONA FIDE. 



BOND. 



pre-emptor. Rutledge v. Murphy, 3 Cent. L. J. 178. 

purchaser. Robinson v. Rowan, 3 III. 499 ; Merritt v. Northern 

R. Co., 12 Barb. 605. 

payments really and — ~ made. In statute. Gibson v. Muskett, 4. 
Man. & G. 168. 

Harman v. Harman, i Baldw. 129; Hargraves v. Cooke, 15 Ga. 321; 
State V. Thomson, 49 Mo. 188; Wood v. Willis, no Mass. 4S4; 
Denton v. Adams, 6 Vt. 40; Gilbert v. Anthony, i Yerg. 69; Hub- 
bel V. Bissel, 2 Allen, 196; U. S. v. Stephenson, i McLean, 462; 
Courand v. Vollmer, 31 Tex. 397; Stone v. Bradbury, 14 Me. 185; 
Pelham v. Grigg, 4 Ark. 141. 

In plea. Ide v. Connecticut R. Co., 32 Vt. 297 ; Stone v. Bradley, 14. 
• Me. 185. 



1 



BOND. 



45 



BORRO WED 



BOND — Continued. 

In statute, U. S. 7'. Linn, 15 Pet. 290 ; Horton v. State, 53 Ala. 489. 

for the payment of money only. In statute, Gillingham v. 

Myers, i McCl. & Yonge, 147. 

with surety. In statute, Ripley v. Merchants' National Bank, 



BONDS. 



BONUS. 



BOOKS. 
BOBN. 

BOBOUGH. 



BOBBOW. 



41 Conn. 187. 

In statute. People v. Mead, 24 N. Y. 114; Murray 7/. Earl of Starth, 2 
B. & r. 93. 

for thepasrmentof money or other things. In statute. Beeks 

V, Forshce, 25 Miss. 55. 

Railroad Co. t/. Maryland, 21 Wall. 456; Kennicott ta Supervisors, 16 
Wall. 452. 

In statute. Mutual Savings Bank v, Wilcox, 24 Conn. 147. 

In statute, Mumford v, Wardwell, 6 Wall. 423 ; White v, Geroch, 2 B. 
& Aid. 300; Clayton v. Stone, 2 Paine, 382; Drury v, Ewing, i 
Bond, 540 ; Clementi v, Golding, 2 Camp. 25 ; Cofieen v, Brunton, 
4 McLean, 516 ; Stowe v. Thomas, 2 Wall. Jr. 547 ; U. S. v, Williams, 
3 Fed. Rep. 484; D'Almaine v, Boosey, i Y. & C. (Ex.) 299; Hime 
V, Dale, 2 Camp. 27, note ; Scoville v, Toland, 6 West. L. J. 84 ; Page 
V. Wisden, 20 L. T. (N. S.) 435 ; British Museum v, Payne, 2 Y. & 
J. 180 ; Leader v, Purdy, 7 C. B. 14. 

acoonnts. In will, Hopkins v. Holt, 9 Wis. 232. 

debts. In statute, Gorgas v, Zeop, 2 Miles, loi ; Cox v, Skeen, 

.3 Ired. (L.) 445 ; Shipley v. Marshall, 14 C. B. (N. S.) 570. 

entries. In statute, Gorgas v, Zeop, 2 Miles, loi. 

of aooonnts. Colbert v, Piercy, 3 Ired. (L.) ^^ ; Richardson v. 



Wingate, 10 West. L. J. 145. 

In statute. Com. 7/. Williams, 9 Mete. 273; re Reed, 12 Bank. Reg. 
390 

of original entries. Smith v. Sanford, 12 Pick. 139(22 Am. 

Dec. 415), note. Ingraham v, Bockius, 9 S. & R. 285 (i i Am Dec. 730). 

public . Merrick v, Wakely, 8 Ad. & Ell. 172. 

and other writings. In statute. Back v. Longman, Cowp. 623. 

or to be . In will, Heisse v, Markland, 2 Rawle, 274 (21 Am. 

Dec. 445) ; Brookman v. Smith, 6 Ex. 291 ; 7 Ex. 271. 
Brown v. State, 18 Ohio St. 496. 

In statute, Faversham v. Isle of Thanet, 2 B. & S. 292 ; King v. McKay. 
5 B. & C. 640. 

In statute, Allerton v, Belden, 49'N. Y. 373 ; Schermerhorn 7/. Tatman, 
14 N. Y. 93; Vilas V, Jones, i N. Y. 274; National Bk. v. Lewis, 
75 N. Y. 516; Cole V, Savage, 10 Paige, 583, 588; Livingston v, 
Harris, 3 Paige, 528; 11 Wend. 335; Leavittv. De Launay, 4 Sandf. 
Ch. 281 ; Post V, Boardman, Clarke, 523 ; Morse v, Hovey, 9 Paige, 
197; Perrine v, Stryker, 7 Paige, 598; Hungerford's Bk. v. Dodge, 
30 Barb. 626; 10 Abb. Pr. 24; Post v, Bk. of Utica, 7 Hill. 391 ; 
Rexford v, Widger, 2 N. Y. 131 ; 3 Barb. Ch. 640. 

money. In statute, Gelpcke v. City of Dubuque, i Wall. 221 ; 

Leavitt I'. Yates, 4 Edw. 134; re British Provident Ass. Co.. 33 L. 

J. (N. S.) 535; Kent V. Mining Co., 78 N. Y. 158. 
Hart V, Benton» 7 J. J. Marsh. 324. 

money. Murray v, Spencer, 24 Md. 520. 

I have . In agreement, Harrow v, Dugan, 6 Dana, 341. 



BORROWING. 



46 



BREAD. 



BOBBOWING. 

BOTH. 

BOTTOMBY. 



In stcUute. Reg. v, St MichaelSt 6 El. & BI. 8fo. 

In statute. King v. Inhabitants, 4 B. & Adol. 710. 

Jennings v, Ins. Co., 4 Binn. 244 ; The Ann C. Pratt, i Curt. C. C. 
340. 

bond. The Draco, 2 Sumn. 157. 

oontrsots of . In statute. Cole v. White, 26 Wend. 511. 

In statute. King v. Town row, i B. & Ad. 479. 

all goods . In contract. Lock wood v, Levick, 8 C. B (N. S.)6o4. 

as now. Com. v. Boston, etc., Corp., 8 Allen, 296. 

to oonviot. Marshall v. Fox, L. R., 6 Q. B. 370. 

on the margin. In deed. Ex parte Jennings, 6 Cow. 526. 



BOUGHT. 
BOUND. 

BOUNDED. 

BOUNDABY. Bates v, Tymason, 13 Wend. 300; Northrop v, Sumney, 27 Barb. 196; 

Kingsland v, Chittenden, 6 Lans. IS ; 61 N. Y. 618; Jenks v, Mor- 
gan, 6 Gray, 448 ; Allen v, Kingsbury, 16 Pick. 235 ; Fla^^g v, Thurs- 
ton, 13 Pick. 145; McCoy v, Golloway, 3 Ohio, 382; Stapleford v. 
Brinson, 2 Ired. (N. C.) 311. 

In statute. Dranguet v, Prudhomme, 3 La. 83. 

of any lands. In statute. Re Ystradgunlais, 8 Q. B.40. 

artifloial . Cox 7/. Friedley, 33 Pa. St. 124; Waterman v, John- 
son, 13 Pick. 261 ; Lernedv. Morrill, 2 N. H. 197; Kennebec Pur- 
chase V, Tiffany, i Me. 219. 

natural . Stapleton v. Brinson, 2 Ired. (L.) 311. 

place having a known . In statute. Queen v. Hardy, 9 B & S. 

826 ; Queen v. Board, L. R., 8 Q. B. 227. 

BOUNTY. Eichelberger v, Liflford, 27 Md. 320; Abbe v, Allen, 39 How. Pr. 381. 

In statute. Fowler v. Selectmen, 8 Allen, 80. 

law. Salt Co. v. East Saginaw, 13 Wall. 373. 

BOWIE-KNIFE. In statute. Sears v. State, 33 Ala. 347. 

In statute, Hodgson v. Little, 14 C. B. (N. S.) 120; 16 C. B (N. S.) 
207. 

suspenders oomposed in part of India rubber. In statute^ 

Arthurs. Davis, 6 Otto, 135. 

In constitution. Green v, Weller, 32 Miss. 651. 

In statute. Dibble v, Hathaway, 18 N. Y. (S. C.) 571. 

knuoks. In statute, Patterson v. State, 3 Lea, 575. 

oommon . Com. v. Foley, 99 Mass. 497. 

In statute. State v, Perkins, 42 N. H. 465. 

of the law. In policy of insurance. Insurance Co. v. Scaver, 19 

Wall. 531. 
of the peace. In statute, Rawlins v, Ellis, 10 Jur. 1039. 



BRANCH. 

BBAND. 

BRASS. 

BRAWIiER. 

BRAWLS. 



BREAD. 



In statute. Queen v. Wood, L. R., 4 Q. B- 559; Queen v, Kennett, L. 

R., 4 Q. B. 56s. 

shall be sold by weight. Jones v, Huxtable, 8 B. & S. 433- 

such as is usual to be eaten. In statute, Ridsdale v, Clifton, 

2 Prob. Div. 276. 

Ibnoy . In statute. Queen v. Wood, 10 B. & S. 535. 

French or fancy . In statute, iEreated Bread Co. v, Gregg, L. 

R., 8 Q. B. 3S5. 



BREAKAGE. 



47 



BRICK. 



during removal. In insurance policy. Marsden v, Ins. Co., i 



BBEAKEB8. 



BBEAKING. 



BBEAKS. 
BRED. 

BB£VET. 

BBIBSD. 

BBIBEBY. 



Harr. & Ruth. 53. 
oirouit ~ — descvibed by him prior to said application. In statute, 
Reg. V, Holmes Burglar Alarm Co., 17 Blatch. 484. 

Rexz^. Gray, i Str. 481 ; Rex v, Haines, Russ. & Ry. 451 ; Rext^. Hall, 
Russ. & Ry. 355 ; Rex z/. Robinson, i Moody, 327 ; Rex z/. McKearney, 
Jebb.99; Rex V. Bailey, Russ. k Ry. 341 ; Reg. v. Bird, 9 C. & P. 44; 
RexT/. Russell, i Moody, 377 ; Rex z/. Brown, 2 East's P. C. 487 ; Rex 
T/. Lawrence, 4 C. & P. 231 ; Rex 2/. Callan, Russ. & Ry. 157 ; Park v, 
Evans, Hob. 62 ; Rex v, Hawkins, i East's P. C. 485 ; Rex v. Bigley, i 
Crawf. k Dix. C. C. 202 ; Rexi/. Perkes, i C. & P. 300 ; Reg. v, Davis, 
Russ. & Ry. 499 ; Rex v, Hughes, i Leach, 406 ; Rex v. Smith, i 
Moody, 178; Rex v. Paine, 7 C. & P. 135; Rex v. Brice, Russ. & 
Ry. 450; Rex v. Lewis, 2 C. & P. 628 ; Rex v. Hymans, 7 C. & P. 
441 ; Reg. V, Spriggs, i M. & R. 35;^ ; Reg. v. Smith, Russ. fa Ry. 
417 ; Pugh z/. Griffith, 7 Ad. & Ell. 827 ; Reg. v. Jordan, 8 C. & P. 
747 ; Gray's Case, i Strange. 481 ; Reg. v. Wheeler, 8 C. & P. 747 ; 
Rex. z/. Cornwell, 2 Strange, 881 ; Reg. za. Egginton, 2 Leach, 913; 
Reg. z/. Campton, 7 C. & P. 139; Reg. z/. Swallow, i Russ. Cr. 792 ; 
State z/. Wilson, Coxe, 439; Curtis z/. Hubbard, i Hill, 336; State z/. 
Newbiggin, 25 Me. 500; Ducher z/. State, 18 Ohio, 308; Com. v, 
Stephenson, 8 Pick. 354 ; Com. z/. Trimmer, i Mass. 476 ; Com. v, 
Newell, 7 Mass. 247 ; Rolland v. Com., 82 Pa. St. 306 ; State v, Reid, 
.20 Iowa, 413; People z/. Bush, 3 Park. C. C. 552; Timmons z/. State, 
34 Ohio St. 426; People v. Nolan, 22 Mich. 229; State v. Scripture, 
42 N. H. 485 ; U. S. V, Bowen, 4 Cranch C. C. 604 ; Hunter v. Com., 
7 Gratt. 641 ; Finch v. Com., 14 Gratt. 643 ; State v, Henry, 9 Ired. 
463; State V, Boon, 13 Ired. 224; Clarke z/. Com., 25 Gratt. 908; 
White V. State, 49 Ala. 344 ; State z/. Mordecai, 68 N. C. 207 ; Allen 
V. State, 40 Ala. 334 ; Frank v. State, 39 Miss. 705 ; State v, Willis, 7 
Jones (N. C), 190; Com. v. Strupney, 105 Mass. 588; Donohoo z/. 
State, 36 Ala. 281 ; State v. Clark, 42 Vt. 629; State v. Moore, 12 N. 
H. 42; Johnson z/. Com., 85 Pa. St. 54; ^Dennis z/. People, 27 Mich. 
151 ; Pines z/. State, 50 Ala. 153; William z/. State, 52 Ga. S^o; White 
V. State, 51 Ga. 285; State z/. McPherson, 70 N. C. 239; Brown z/. 
State, 55 Ala. 123 ; State z/. Ward, 43 Conn. 489. 

In statute. Pines v. State, 50 Ala. 1 53. 

jaiL Rex z/. Howard, i Russ. & Ry. 459. 

into. In statute. Brown v. State, 55 Ala. 124. 

kept or preserved. In statute. Rex v. Caradice, i Russ. & Ry. 

206. 

U. S. V. Hunt, 14 Wall. 550. 

In indictment. Com. v. Stephenson, 3 Mete. (Ky.) 226. 

Rex V. Gibbons, i East, 183; State v. Ellis, 33 N. J. (L.) 102; State v. 
Church, 5 Oregon, 575 ; Reg. v. Pitt, 3 Burr. 1335 ; Rex v. Plympton, 
2 Ld. Raym. 1377; Rex v. Taggart, i C. & P. 201 ; Rex z/. Jolliffe, i 
East, 154 ; Com. v. Shaver, 3 W. & S. 338 ; Com. v. Callaghan, i Va. 
Cas. 460; Russell z/. Com., 3 Bush, 469; Vaughan's Case, 4 Burr. 
2494 ; Barefield z/. State, 14 Ala. 603 ; State z/. Carpenter, 20 Vt. 9 ; 
Com. z/. Chapman, i Va. Cas. 138; Hutchinson v. State, 36 Tex. 
293 ; Simpson v. Yeend, L. R., 4 Q. B. 626 ; Dishon v. Smith, 10 Iowa, 
212. 

dwelling. In insurance policy. Mead v. North-western Ins. Co., 



7 N. Y. 530. 



BRICK. 



48 



BROTHERS. 



3BIGK — Continued. 



BBIDGE. 



IBBIDGSS. 



BBIEF. 
BRINGING. 

BBinSH. 



BBOAD. 



BBOTHEB. 



BBOTHEB8. 



fbotory. In deed, Allen v, Scott, 21 Pick. 25. 

store. In warrant. Lowrcy v. Gri<]ley, 50 Conn. 450. 

Proprietors v. Hoboken Land Co., 13 N. J. (Eq.) 504; Reg. v. Derby- 
shire, 2 Q. B. 745; Board of Freeholders v. Strader, 18 1^. J. (L.) 
108; Enfield Toll Bridge v. Hartford, etc., R. Co., 17 Conn. 56; Tol- 
land V, Wellington, 26 Conn. 578 ; State t/. Hudson Co., 30 N. J. (L.) 
147 ; State v. Gorham, 37 Me. 451 ; Burnett v. New Orleans, 42 Conn. 
174; Kingz/. Inhabitants, 3 B. & Ad. 210; 3 Ad. & Ell. 70; 2 B. & 
Ad. 81 5 ; Parrott v. City of Lawrence, 2 Dill. 332. 

In statute. Bridge Co. v. Hoboken Land Co., 10 N. J. 81 ; i Wall. 116; 
Thompson v. New York, etc., R. Co., 3 Sandf (Ch.) 625 ; Lake v. 
Virginia, etc., R. Co., 7 Nev. 294 ; McLeod v. Savannah, etc., R. Co.» 
25 Ga. 445; Board of Freeholders v. Strader, 18 N. J. (L.) 108; 
Queen v. Poynter, 13 Q. B. 399; Ward v. Gray, 6 B. & S. 350; 
Queen v. Southampton, 18 Q. B. 841 ; City of Grand Haven v. New 
York, etc., R. Co., 39 Conn. 128; Phillips v. East Haven, 44 Conn. 
29; Covington Co. v. Kinney, 45 Ala. 176; Com. v. Central Bridge, 
12 Cush. 244. 

oonnty . Eyler v. Conners, 49 Md. 258. 

private . King t/. Inhabitants, 12 East, 203. 

public . Rex v. Inhabitants, 2 East, 342 ; Rex v. Northampton, 

2 M. & S. 262 ; Rex v. Devon, R. & M. 144. 

In statute. McPheeters v. Merrimac Bridge Co., 28 Mo. 465. 

ootuity . Chandler v. Fremont Co., 42 Iowa, 58. 

road. Flagg v. Flagg, 16 Gray, 175. 

Gardner v. Stover, 43 Ind. 356. 

in. In statute. Jackson v. Jackson, 28 Miss. 680. 

8Ul]jeot. In treaty. Inglis v. Trustees, 3 Pet. 99; Shanks v. 

Dupont, 3 Pet. 242. 

weight. In charter-party. Goddard 7/. Bulow, i N. & McC. 45 



(9 Am. Dec. 663.) 

In statute. Thomas v. Evans, i El. Bl. & El. 171. 

Pott V. Turner, 6 Bing. 702; Saladin v. Mitchell, 45 III. 79; Baring 7^ 
Cowie, 2 B. & Aid. 148; Higgins v. Moore, 34 N. Y. 418; Graham 
V. Duckwall, 8 Bush, 12 ; Todd v. Bourke, 27 La. Ann. 385 ; Hender- 
son V. State, 50 Ind. 234; Hinckley v. Arey, 27 Me. 362, Keys z/. 
Johnson, 68 Pa. St. 42 ; Dunn v. Wright, 51 Barb. 244; Portland v. 
O'Neill, I Oregon, 218; Slack v. Tucker, 23 Wall. 321 ; Perkins ^^ 
State, 50 Ala. 154 ; Scott v. Johnson, 19 C. B. (N. S.) 138. 

In statute. U. S. v. Cutting, 3 Wall. 441 ; U. S. v. Simmons, i Abb. (U. 
S.) 470; Warren v. Shook, 91 U. S. 704; City of Little Rock v. Bar- 
ton, 33 Ark. 437 ; Clarke v. Powell, 4 B. & Ad. 860 ; Rawlinson v. 
Pearson, 5 B. & Aid. 128; Cope v. Rowlands, 2 M. & W. 149; Mil- 
ford V. Hughes, 16 M. & W. 174 ; Smith v. Lindo, 4 C. B. (N. S.) 397 ; 
Com. v. Holmes, 11 Pa. St. 470; Chadwick v. Collins, 16 Pa. St. 270; 
Northup V. Chick, 10 Blatchf. 243. 

oommercial. In statute. Slack v. Tucker, 23 Wall. 329. 

In statute. Wheeler v. Clutterbuck, 52 N. Y. 67 ; State v. Schaun- 
horst, 34 Iowa, 547 ; Dane v. Walker, 109 Mass. 179. 

In insurance policy. Bridgmanz/. London Life Ins. Co., 44 U. C. Q. R 
536. 



BROTHERS. 



49 



BUILDING. 



BBOTHEB8 — Continued. 

and siBters. In statute, Clark v. Sprague, 5 Blackf. 412 ; Moore 

7/. Abemathy, 7 Blackf. 442 ; Cliver v, Sanders, 8 Ohio St. 501 ; Gard- 
ner V. Collins, 3 Mason, 400. 

In statute, Hine v, Belden, 27 Conn. 384 ; Reg v. Padwick, 8 EI. & Bl* 

707. 
before any magistrate. In statute, Hadley v. Perks, 7 B. & S. 37$. 



BROUGHT. 



BlTGKafrEBY. 



BUILD. 



BUILDING. 



Rex V, Duffin, i East's. P. C. 437 ; Rex v, Reekspear, i Moody, C. C. 
342; Rex V, Cousins, 6 C. & P. 351 ; Rex v, Mulreaty, i Russ., C. & 
M. 938 ; Rex v, Jacobs, Russ. & Ry. 331 ; Rex v, Jellyraan, 8 C. & P. 
604 ; Rex V. Allen, i Den. C. C. 364 ; Com. v, Thomas, i Va. Cas. 307. 

to markets. In statute, Peterson v. Mayor, 17 N. Y. 449. 

and deliyer. In contract. The Revenue Cutter, 4 Sawy. 144. 

In statute. King v, Grecnway, 71 N. Y. 314 ; Calkin v, U. S., 3 Ct. of 
Claims. 297 ; Duncan v, Batenian, 23 Ark. 327. 

Reg. V, Labadire, 32 U. C. Q. B. 429. 

In contract, Charlton v, Gibson, i C. & K. 541. 

In deed. Manners v. Johnson, i Ch. Div. 673 ; Wright v, Evans, a 
Abb. Pr. (N. S.) 308. 

In insurance policy. White v, Springfield Ass. Co., 8 Gray, 566. 

In lease, Sherman v, Williams, 113 Mass. 481. 

In statute, Shattel v. Woodward, 17 Ind. 225 ; La Crosse, etc., R. Co. 
V, Vanderpool, 11 Wis. 119; Truesdell v. Gay, 13 Gray, 311 ; Hill 
V, LaCrosse, etc., R. Co., 1 1 Wis. 214 ; Coddington v. Dry Dock Co., 2 
Vroom, 477; Presbyterian Church v, Allison, 10 Pa. St. 413; Mc- ' 
Ilvain 7/. Hestonville, etc., R. Co., 5 Phila. 13; Thomas v. Smith, 
42 Pa. St. 68 ; Pratt v, Seavey, 41 Me. 370 ; Bodley v. Den mead, i 
W. Va. 249; Olmstead v, McNall, 7 Blackf. 357; McDermott 
V, Palmer, 8 N. Y. 383 ; Coddington v, Beebe, 31 N. J. (L.) 477 ; 
Miller v, Hershey, 59 Pa. St. 64; Tuttle v. State, 4 Conn. 68; 
State 7/. Livermore, 44 N. H. 386; King v, Gregory, 5 B. & Ad. 
563 ; State v, Barr, 39 Conn. 41 ; Harris v, Avery, L. R., i C. P. 150 ; 
Morish v, Harris, L. R., i C, P. 155 ; Queen v. Manning, L. R., i C. 
C. R. 340 ; Morish v, Harris, i Harr. & Ruth. 328 ; Edwards v, 
Elliott, 21 Wall. 532; Com. v, Bossidy, 112 Mass. 278; Sherman v, 
Williams, 1 13 Mass. 481 ; Com. v. McCaughey, 9 Gray, 297 ; Powell v. 
Farmer, 18 C. B. (N. S.) 174 ; Powell v. Boraston, 18 C. B. (N. S.) 180; 
Stevens V. Gourley, 7 C. B. (N. S.) 1 10 ; Watson v. Cotton, 5 C. B. 52. 

altering, repairing or ornamenting. In statute. Drew v. 

Mason, 81 111. 498. 

erection or tiling. In statute, Colbran v, Barnes, 1 1 C. B. (N. 

S.)247; II C. B. 252. 

for puipoBea of education. In deed. Peck v, Claflin, 105 

Mass. 422. 
^— land. In statute. Directors v, Blackmore, L. R., 4 H. L. 610. 
made use of Ibr printing or drying calioo. In statute, Dix- 



on's Case, I Russ. & Ry. 54. 

wharf or other superstruoture. In statute, Ellison v, Jack- 
son, 12 Gal. 542. 

any other . In statute. Rex v, Norris, i Russ. & Ry. 69 ; Toms 

V, Luckert, 5 C. B. 36. 

dwelling-honae or other . In statute. Bank of Charleston v. 

Curtiss, 18 Conn. 342. 

old : , In statute. Tear v, Freebody, 4 C. B. (N. S.) 225. 



B UILDING. 



50 



BUSHEL 



fiUUiDING — Continued. 

timber for 

uBed Ibr — 
Cas. 104. 

when the - 



— . In deed, Livingston v. Ten Broeck* 16 Johns. 14. 
purposes. In statute, Coventry v, S. Co., L. R., 5 Eq. 



is inolosed. In contract, Snell v. Church Trustees, 



58 III. 292. 
wooden 



In ordinance, Stewart v. Com., 10 Watts, 307. 



BUILDINGS. In deed, Cornish v, Cleifie, 3 H. & C. 450. 

and wharves* In statute, Burt v, Washington, 3 Cal. 246. 

public . In statute, Arnell v, R. Co., 12 C. B. 69. 



BUILT. 



BULL. 

BULLIOir. 

BUBDEN. 



BXTBGIiABY. 



BUBIAL. 



BUBLAPS. 
BUBll'. 



BUBXTED. 
BUBinNG. 

BUBNT. 
BUBYING. 

BTT8HEL. 



In statute. King v. Inhabitants, 2 B. & Ad. 815. 

road shall be . In subscription, Muscatine, etc., R. Co. v, Hor- 

ton, 38 Iowa, 33; Warner z/. Callender, 20 Ohio St. 19a. 

thereafter . In statute. Webb's Case, 2 Leigh, 721. 

In indictment. State v, McMinn, 34 Ark. 160. 

I East's P. C. 149, 188. 

of proof. Queen v, Curgerwen, L. R., i C. C. R. 3; Wilder v, 

Cowles, 100 Mass. 487 ; Crowninshield v, Crowninshield, 2 Gray, 524. 

In statute. King v. Goldsmith, v B. & Ad. 835 ; Hulls v, Eastcourt, 2 

H. & C. S9. 
or inhabitants. In statute. King v. Greet, 8 B. & C. 374. 

Cole V, People, 37 Mich. 544; Dodd v. State, 33 Ark. 317; Allen v. 
State, 40 Ala. 334 ; State v. Ward, 43 Conn. 489 ; Hunter v. State, 29 
Ind. 80 ; Com. v, Newell, 7 Mass. 247 ; People v. Bush, 3 Park. C. C. 
552 ; Hollister v. Com., 60 Pa. St. 103. 

ground. In statute, Jenkins v, Andover, 103 Mass. 10 

places. In statute, Foster v, Dodd, 7 B. & S. 169. 

used for . In statute, Cowley v, Byas, 5 Ch. Div. 751, 

In statute, Arthur v, Cumming, i Otto, 362. 

Howel V, Com., 5 Gratt. 664 ; People v, Butler, 16 Johns. 203 ; Reg. v. 
Russell, Car. & M. 541 ; Reg. v, Parker, 9 C. & P. 45 ; Rex. v. Stallion, 
I Moody, 398 ; Com. v. Van Shaack, 16 Mass. 105 ; State v, Mitchell, 
5 Ired. 350; Com. v. Tucker, no Mass. 403; People v, Cottrell, 18 
Johns. 115 ; State v, Sandy, 3 Ired. 570; People v, Haggerty, 46 Cal. 
354; People V, Simpson, 50 Cal. 304; Hester v. State, 17 Ga. 130; 
Rex V, Judd, 2 T. R. 255 ; McDade v. People, 29 Mich. 50 ; Mary v. 
State, 24 Ark. 44; Cochrane v. State, 6 Md. 400; Graham v. State, 
40 Ala. 659; Com. v, Belton, 5 Cush. 427; State v, De Brul, 10 
Rich. 23 ; Doe v. Harris, 6 Ad. & Ell. 215 ; 8 Ad. & Ell. 10. 

In indictment, Hester v. State, 17 Ga. 130. 

In indictment. Com. v. Tucker, 1 10 Mass. 403. 

fluid. In insurance policy. Marsh v. National Fire Ins. Co., 24 

Hun, 575 ;. Putnam v. Commonwealth Ins. Co., 4 Fed. Rep. 753. 

In statute, Johnson v, Bradsford, 2 N. & Mc. 272 (10 Am. Dec. 601). 

grounds. In statute. Appeal Tax Court v, St. Peter's Academy^ 

50 Md. 321.- 

Hockin v, Cooke, 4 T. R. 314. 

In contract. Milk z/. Christie, i Hill, 102; Richardson t/. Spafford, 13 
Vt. 245. 

lit statute, Caldwell v, Dawson, 4 Mete. (Ky.) 121. 



BUSINESS, 



SI 



BUSINESS. 



BXTsnrBss. 



Bish V, Keeling, i M. & S. 95. 

In contract. Ewing v, Johnson, 34 How. Pr. 202. 

In deed. Doe v. Bird, 2 Ad. & £11. 161 ; Bramwell v. Lacy, 10 Ch. 
Div. 691. 

In statute. King v, Piatt, 37 N. Y. 155 ; Goddard v, Chafiee, 2 Allen, 
395 ; Parker Mills v, Commr. of Taxes, 23 N. Y. 242 ; Moore v. 
State, 16 Ala. 41 1 ; Bloom v, Richards, 2 Ohio St. 387 ; Johnson z/- 
State, 44 Ala. 415; re Hynes, 49 L. J. (N. S.) Bankr. 62 ; Espyz/. 
State, 47 Ala. 533; Martin v. State. 59 Ala. 36; Harris v, Amery, i 
Harr. & Ruth. 357; Fennell v, Ridler, 5 B. & C. 409; Mechanics* 
Bk. V, Meridian Agency Co., 24 Conn. 1 59 ; Sumner v, Marcy, 3 
Woodb. & M. 105 ; Goddard v, Chaffee, 2 Allen, 395. 

oard« In contrcict. Stoops v. Smith, 100 Mass. 63. 

oorporation. In statute, Adams v, Boston, etc., R. Co., i 

Holmes, 30; Winter v, Iowa, etc., R. Co., 2 Dill. 487; re Hercules 
Ins. Co., 5 Am. L. T. Rep. 400; re Independent Ins. Co., i Holmes, 
103. 

hours. John v. Bank, 57 Ala. 96 ; Derosia v, Winona, etc., R. 



Co., 18 Minn. 133. 

— of a court. In statute. King v. Piatt, 37 N. Y. 155. 

— of a ooiirt of erimiiial or oivil judioature. In statute. Palmer 
V. Powell, 6 M. & W. 627. 

— of a slaughterer of cattle. In statute, Liverpool New Cattle 
Market v. Hodson, 8 B. & S. 184. 

— or employment. In statute, Moore v. State, 16 Ala. 41 1. 

— or work. In statute. King v. Inhabitants, 7 B. & C. 600. 

— purposes. In statute. Smith v, Thompson, 8 C. B. 59. 

— that might be oflbzudve. In deed, Jones v, Thorne, i B. & 



C. 715 
carry on 



In statute. Holmes z/. Holmes, 40 Conn. 117 ; Shiels 



V, R. Co., 30 L. J. (Q. B.) 331 ; re Alabama R. Co., 9 Blatchf. 391. 

carry on the of a wine merchant. In contract. Turner v. 

Evans, 2 El. & Bl. 512. 

doing any • In statute. Price v, St. Louis Ins. Co., 3 Mo. (App.) 

269. 

doing . In statute. Smith v. International Ins. Co., 35 How. 

Pr. 126. 

engage in trade or . 



In statute, Netterville v. Barber, 52 



Miss. 168. 

in and about her . Dean v. Brown, 5 B. & C. 337. 

labor or work. In statute, Pattee v, Greeley, 13 Mete. 284. 



mercantile 
ordinary — 



— . In statute. Graham v, Hendricks, 22 La. Ann. 523. 
In statute. Norton v. Powell, 4 M. AG. 4a. 

outward mark or show of . In deed, Evans v. Davis, 10 Ch. 

Div. 747. 

place of . In statute, Rolfe v, Learmonth, 14 Q. B. 197: Minor 

V. R. Co., I C. B. (N. S.) 327. 

such other as may be provided by law. In statute. State v. 

Tolle, 71 Mo. 646. 

tanning . In agreement, Barger v, Caldwell, 2 Dana, 131. 



B U SI NESS. 52 B Y-LA W. 



BUSINESS — Continued. 

to act in all my . In power of attorney, Ashley v. Bird, i Mo. 

640 (14 Am. Dec. 313). 

usual and ordinary oourse of . In statute. Tiffany t/. Lucas, 

15 Wall. 410. 

whose it is. In statute, Warren v. Shook, i Otto, 704. 

BUT. Abbott V. Middleton, 7 H. L. Cas. 75. 

/// statute. Union Paper Bag Co. v, Newell, 1 1 Blatchf. 382. 

BUTCHER. Emraerton v. Matthews, 7 Hurl. & N. 590, 

In statute, Henback v. State, 53 Ala. 523 ; Mayor v, Davis, 6 W. & S. 
269. 

trade or business of a . In statute. Doe v. Spry, i B. & Aid. 

620. 

BUYEBS. - — option* Pickering v. Demerritt, 100 Mass. 416. 

In contract, Coonley z/. Anderson, i Hill, 519; Rankin v. Woodworth, 

3 Pa. 48. 
In deed. Wells v, Ins. Co., 48 N. H. 493 ; Bailey v. White, 41 N. H. 

337 ; The Magnolia v, Marshall, 39 Miss. 100 ; Wilson v, Inloes, 6 

Gill, 121 ; Thomas v. Hatch, 3 Sumn. 170. 

In indictment. Com. v. Griffin, 105 Mass. 175. 

In order of court, Oxley v. Bridges, i Doug. (>T, 

In statute, Boyce v, Wilkins, 5 S. & R. 330 ; Cavence v. Butler, 6 
Binney, 53. 

a stream. In deed, Thomas v. Hatch, 3 Sumn. 170. 

and at the expense of the purchaser. In contract. Gabriel v. 

Smith, 17 Q. B. 847. 

authority. Merrifield v, Robbins, 8 Gray, 150. 

final judgment. In agreement, Hanbert v, Haworth, 78 Pa. St. 



78. 

— force. In insurance policy, Fischer v, Hope, etc., Ins. Co., 40 N. 
Y. (S. C.) 291. 

— force of the statutes* In information, Attorney-General v. 



Le Revert, 6 M. & W. 409. 

« 

— from or under. In lease, Stanley v. Hays, 3 Q. B. 105. 

— uieans of. Com. v. Walker, 108 Mass. 313. 

— N'ovember next. In contract, Rankin v, Woodworth, 3 Pen. 
& W. 48. 

— the first day of N'ovember. In contract. Coonley v, Ander- 



son, I Hill, 519. 

— the year. Pleasants v, Claghorn, 2 Miles, 302. 

— virtue of hiseuiployment. In statute. Rex v. Beeson, i Russ. 
& Ry. 320. 

— virtue of his office. In statute, Staight v. Gee, 2 Stark. 445. 

— way of deposit. In lease. Palmer v. Temple, 9 Ad. & Ell. 508. 

— whose means. Fitchburgh v, Cheshire R. Co.« no Mass. 210. 



known . In indictment. Com. v. Griffin, 105 Mass. 175. 

BY-LAW. In statute. Com. v. Turner, i Cush. 494; Drake z/. Hudson River R. 

Co., 7 Barb. 508; Compton v. Van Valkenburg, 34 N. J. (L.) 134; 
Hopkins v. Mayor, 4 M. & W. 621 ; Gosling v, Veley, 19 L. J. N. S. 
(Q. B.) 135. 



B YSTANDERS. 53 CAPITAL. 

BYSTAJMl^JSi&S. In statute. Simon v, Gratz, 2 Penr. & W. 412 (23 Am. Dec. i). 

CABIK. Harvie v. Turner, 46 Mo. 444. 

In contract, Leckie v. Sears, 109 Mass. 424. 

CABINEP. of ouriosities. In will. Cavendish v. Cavendish, i Cox Ch. ^^ \ 

I Brown Ch. 467. 

CABINET- WABE. In policy of insurance, Appleby v. Astor Fire Ins. Co., 54 N. Y. 

2S3. 

CABI«E. of any size. In specification, Hastings v. Brown, i El. & Bl. 451. 

CAIjCXJIaATED. In instruction, Gerrish v, N orris, 9 Cush. 170. 

CAIiL. Ambergate, etc., R. Co. v, Mitchell, 4 Ex. 540; Shaw v, Rowley, 16 M. 

& W. 810; Newry, etc., R. Co. v. Edmunds, 5 Eng. Rail. Cas. 275; 
ex parte Tooke, 6 id. i ; Pixley t. Boy n ton, 79 111. 351. 

CALLED. to testify thereto by the opposite party. In statute. Thomas 

V, Thomas, 42 Ala. 120. 

upon to pay. In statute. Cook v, Luckett, 2 C. B. 174. 

CALLTN'G. ordinary . In statute. King v. Inhabitants, 7 B. & C. 600. 

CAME. by descent, gift or devise. In stcUute, Gardner v, Collins, 2 

Pet. 58. 

CAMPHENE. In fire insurance policy, Westfall v, H. R. R. R., 12 N. Y. 290; Harper 

V, Alb. Ins. Co., 17 N. Y. 194. 

spirit gas, burning fluid or chemioal oils. In insurance policy, 

Wheeler v, American Cent. Ins. Co., 6 Mo. (App.) 235. 

CAMP-MEETING. oongregation or other assembly of people met for reli- 
gious worship. In statute. State v, Schieneman, 64 Mo. 386. 

CAW. Beal v. Finch, 11 N. Y. 128. 

CANADA. money. In contract, Thompson v, Sloan, 23 Wend. 71. 

CANAL. Rex v, Kent, 13 East. 220; Rex v, Chelsea Water-Works, 5 B. & Aid. 

156; Riddle v. Proprietors, 7 Mass. 169; Com. v. Fisher, i Penn. 
462 ; Rogers v. Bradshaw, 20 Johns. 735. 

In deed. Bishop v, Seeley, 18 Conn. 390. 

boat. In statute. The Vermont, 6 Ben. 115 ; The Mamie, 5 Tex. 

820; Buckley v. Brown, 3 Wall. Jr. 204. 

revenues. In Constitution, People v, N. Y. Cent. R. R. 24 N, 



Y. 485; 34 Barb. 123. 
CAlfCEL. Winton v. Spring, 18 Cal. 451 ; Ballard v, Burnside, 49 Barb. 102. 

In agreement. Auburn City Bk. v. Leonard, 40 Barb. 119. 

CAlfCELATION'. Spear v, Alexander, 42 Ala. 572. 

CANCSLENQ*. In statute. Doe v. Perks, 3 B. & Aid. 492. 

or obliterating. In statute. Baptist Church v, Robbarts, 2 

Pa. St. no. 

CAKDLES. In statute, Att'y Gen. v, Barrell, i Younge & J. 498. 

CAKNOT. be asoertained. In statute, Reg. v. Inhabitants, 8 Q. B. 559. 

CANON. Hart v, Burnett, 15 Cal. 556. 

CANT. Hayes v, Cuny, 9 Mart. (La.) 87. 

CANVAS. floorcloth . In statute, Arthur v, Cumniings, i Otto, 363. 

CAPACITY. producing . In statute. Collector v, Beggs, 17 Wall. 182. 

CAPITAL. In statute. Sun Mut. Ins. Co. v. Mayor, 8 N. Y. 240; People v. Com- 

mrs., 23 N. Y. 192 ; International Ass. Co. v, Commrs., 28 Barb. 318; 
New Haven v. City Bank, 31 Conn. 106; State Bank v. Bracken- 



CAPITAL. 



54 



CARPENTERS. 



QAJEfTSAI^ — Continued. 

ridge, 7 Blatchf. 395 ; Bailey z/. Clark, 21 Wall. 284; Mechanics' Bank 
V, Townshend, 5 Blatchf. 315; People v. Supervisors, 18 Wend. 605. 

In will, Vernon v, Vernon, 53 Cal. 351 ; Enohin v. Wylie, 10 H. L. 
Cas. I. 

stook. In corporation charter. New Haven v. City Bank, 31 

Conn. 109 ; State v, Norwich, etc., R. Co., 30 Conn. 296 ; State %>. 
Morristown Fire Assn. 23 N. J. (L.) 195 ; Hightower v. Thornton, 
8 Ga. 486 ; Barry v. Merchants' Exchange Co., i Sandf. 250 ; Read 
V, Eatonton Manfg. Co., 40 Ga. 98. 

In statute. State Bank v. City of Milwaukee, 18 Wis. 281 ; Philadel- 
phia z'. Gray's Ferry, etc., R. Co., 52 Pa. St. 177; Pacific Hotel Co. 
V, Lieb, 83 111. 602 ; St. Louis, etc., R. Co. v, Loftin, 30 Ark. 693 ; 
Pratt V, Munson, 17 Hun, 475 ; Railroad Co.. v, Vance, 6 Otto, 455; 
Railroad Co. v, Gaines, 7 Otto, 707. 

United States v. Padelford, 9 Wall. 531 ; Mauwin v, Ins. Co., 6 Wall. 
i; United States v. Athens Armory, 35 Ga. 344; The Grotius, 9 
Cranch, 368; Moxon v. The Fanny, 2 Pet. Adm. 309; Decatur z/. 
United States, Dev. 33 ; Lee v, Boardman, 3 Mass. 238. 

In insurance poiicy. Dole v. New England Ins. Co., 6 Allen, 373 ; Dole 
V, Merchants' Ins. Co., 51 Me. 465 ; Richardson v. Maine Ins. Co., 6 
Mass. 102 ; Archibald v. Mercantile Ins. Co., 3 Pick. 70. 

andaeisure. In insurance policy. Powell v, Hyde, 5 El. & BI. 

607. 

In insurance policy, Pipon v. Cope, i Camp. 434. 

pointB. In contract. Finnie v. Clay, 2 Bibb, 351. 

In statute • State v, Buffington, 20 Kas. 599. 

and Tnanagement. In order. Boodle v. Dames, 3 Ad. & Ell. 207. 

direction and management. In plea. Taylor v. Clay, 9 Q. B. 7 1 3. 

A* of B. Ely V. American, etc., Ex. Co., 29 Wis. 611. 

ordinary . State v. Railroad, 52 N. H. 528. 

utmost and diligence. Baltimore, etc., R. Co. v, Worthington, 



CAPTUBES. 
CAHBINAL. 
GABE. 



CABEFUL. 
CABGO. 



21 Md. 275. 

want of < 

especially — 



Warner v. Dunnavan, 23 111. 380. 

. Chicago, etc., R. Co. v, Clark, 2 Bradw. 116. 



Seamans v, Loring, i Mason, 127; Flanigan v, Demarest, 3 Robt. 173; 
Twing V, Great Western Ins. Co., 103 Mass. 406. 

In contract, Kreuger v, Blanck, L. R., 5 Ex. 179. 

In insurance policy, Allegre v, Maryland Ins. Co., i Gill. & J. 136 (20 
Am. Dec.'424) ; Walcott v. Eagle Ins. Co., 4 Pick. 429; Paddock v, 
Franklin Ins. Co., 11 Pick. 227; Macyz/. Wheeling Ins. Co., 9 Mete. 
354; Wilkinson v, Hyde, 3 C. B. (N. S.) 44; Paddock v. Franklin 
Ins. Co., 1 1 Pick. 227 ; Thwing v. Great Western. Ins. Co., 103 Mass. 
406 ; Humphries v. Ins. Co., 3 Mason, 440 ; Bayard v. Ins. Co., 4 
id. 265. 

In statute. Borroman v, Drayton, 2 Ex. Div. 15. 

knowledge. Noble v. State, 22 Ohio St. 541. 

know. In indictment. Com. v. Squires, 97 Mass. 59. 

CABFENTEB8. in their own shops or in buildings erecting or repairing. 

In insurance policy, Delonguemare v. Tradesman's Ins. Co., 2 Hall, 
589. 



CABNAL. 
CABNAIiLY. 



CARRIAGE. 



55 



CARR Y. 



CABBIAQE. 



GABBIAGES. 
CABBIED. 



CABBIES. 



In statute, Lovering v. Stone, 2 B. & C. Si8 .* Jackson v, Curwen, 5 B. 
^ G|36 ; Isaacs v. Third Ave. R. R., 47 N. Y. 123 ; Conway v. Jeffer- 
son, 46 N. H. 521 ; Taylor v. Goodwin, 4 Q. B. Div. 228; Speck v. 
Powell, L. R., 9 Ex. 25. 

In ordinance, Snyder v. North Lawrence, 8 Kas. 82. 

oontaining volunteer inftntry. In statute. Stephenson v. Tay- 
lor, I B. & S. 107. 

wagon, oart or other . In statute. Danby v. Hunter, 5 Q. R 

Div. 20. 

wheeled . In statute, Radnoshire Bd. v. Evans, 3 B. & S. 402. 

In statute. Hegan v. Eighth Ave. R. R., 1 5 N. Y. 380. 

into any port. In statute. The Pieve Superiore. L. R.. 4 Adm. 

& Ecc. 170. 

In statute. Ex parte Middleton, 3 B. & C. 164. 

of the mail. In statute. Wynen v. Schappert, 6 Daly, 558. 

oommon . Cog^s v. Bernard, 2 Ld. Raym. 909; Gisbourn v. 

Hurst, I Salk. 249; Dwight v. Brewster, i Pick. 50; Hale v. New 
Jersey Steam Nav. Co., 15 Conn. 539; Craig v. Childress, Peck, 270 
(14 Am. Dec. 751); Buckland v. Adams' Ex. Co., 97 Mass. 124; The 
Niagara v. Cordes, 21 How. 7 ; Peik v. Chicago, etc, R. Co., 94 U. 
S. 164; Chicago, etc., R. Co. v. Ackley, 94 U. S. 179; Winona, etc., 
R Co. V. Blake, 94 U. S. 180; Christenson v. Am. Ex. Co., 15 Minn. 
270; Lowell Wire Fence Co. v. Sargent, 8 Allen, 189; Sherman r/. 
Wells, 28 Barb. 403 ; Baldwin v. Am. Ex. Co., 23 111. 497 ; Read v. 
Spaulding, 5 Bosw. 395 ; Haslam v. Adams' Ex. Co., 6 Bosw. 235 ; 
Sweet V. Barney, 23 N. Y. 335 ; Verner v. Sweitzer. 32 Pa. St. 208 . 
Southern Ex. Co. v. Newby, 36 Ga. 635 ; Hollister v. Nowlen, 19 
Wend. 234; Cole v. Goodwin, 19 Wend. 251 ; Clark v. Faxton, 26 
Wend. 153; Powell v. Myers, 26 Wend. 591 ; Camden, etc., Transp. 
Co. V, Belknap, 21 Wend. 354; Jones v. Voorhees, 10 Ohio, 145; 
Richards v. Westcott, 2 Bosw. 589; Parmelee 7a McNulty, 19 111. 
556; Parmelee v. Lowitz, 74 111. 116; Dibble v. Brown, 12 Ga. 217; 
South-western R. Co. v. Webb, 48 Ala. 585 ; Levi v. Lynn, etc.. Horse 
R. Co., II Allen, 300; Gordon v. Hutchinson, 1 W. & S. 285 ; Smith 
V. Pierce, i La. 349 ; Adams v. New Orleans Towboat Co., 1 1 La. 46 ; 
Walston V. Myers, 5 Jones, 174; White v. The Mary Ann, 6 Cal. 
462; Ashmore v. Penn. Steam Tow Co., 28 N. J. (L.) 180; Caton 
. V. Rumney, 13 Wend. 387; Alexander v. Greene, 3 Hill, 9; Wells 
V. Steam Nav. Co., 2 N. Y. 204; Leonard v. Hendrickson, 18 Pa. St 
40; Varble v. Bigley, 14 Bush, 698; Pullman Palace Car Co. v. 
Smith, 73 111. 360 ; Blum v. Southern Pullman Pal. Car Co., 3 Cent 
L. J. 591 ; McAndrew v. Electric Tel. Co., 17 C. B. 3; Parks v. Alta 
Cal. Tel. Co., 13 Cal. 242; Western Un. Tel. Co. v. Carew, 15 Mich. 
525 ; Shelden v. Robinson, 7 N. H. 157 (26 Am. Dec. 762). 

conoealed about his i>eT8on. In statute, Owen v. State, 31 Ala. 



387; Washington v. State, 36 Ga. 242; Hicks v. Com., 7 Gratt. 597. 

In statute. Owen v. State, 31 Ala. 387. 

on businesB. In statute. Corbett v. General Steam Nav. Co., 4 

Hurl. & N. 483; Le Tallier v. R. Co., 3 C. P. Div. 19; Brown v. R. 
Co., 4 B. & S. 326. 

In contract. Brampton v. Beddoes, 13 C. B. (N. S.) 538. 

on or exeroiae the praotiLoe or profession of a surgeon. In 

deed. Rawlinson v. Clarke, 14 M. & W. 189. 



f 



CARR y. 



56 



CASH. 



CABBYING. 



CABBY — Continued. 

to BeUL In statute. King v. McKnigbt,#o B. & C. 736. 

take and away. In indictment. Com. z/. Adams, 7 Gray, 443. 

Pickering v, Demeritt, 100 Mass. 416. 

on buflineas. In statute. Weil v. State, 52 Ala. 19; U. S. v. 

Jackson, i Hughes, 331. 

In statute. Webb, v, Brandon, 4 Heisk. 285 ; Favers v. Glass, 23 
Ala. 621. 

or tmdk-wagon. In statute. Smith v. Chase, 71 Me. 164. 

taxed . In statute, Williams v, Lear, L. R., 7 Q. B. 285. 



CABT. 



CAS. 

CASE. 



CASES. 



CASH. 



In contract. Fanners, etc., Bk. v. Day, 13 Vt, 36. 

Blyew V. U. S., 13 Wall. 595; Kundolf v, Thalheimer, 12 N. Y. 592; 
Benson v. Cromwell, 26 Barb. 218. 

In constitution, Cohens v. Virginia, 6 Wheat. 264. 

In order of court. Wingate v, Haywood, 40 N. H. 445. 

arising tinder the constitution and laws of the United Stated. 

In statute, American Ins. Co. v. Canter, i Pet. 511. 

at law. In constitution. Re Houghton, 42 Cal. 37. 

in whioh the law of the United States authorises an oath to 



be administered. In statute, U. S. v, Volz, 14 Blatchf. 15. 
actions upon the . In statute, Carroll v. Green, 2 Otto, 510. 

and in . In contract. Rust v. Nottidge, i El. & Bl. 99. 



&cts of his 



In affidavit. Fitzhugh v, Truax, i Hill, 644; Ellis 



V. Jones, 6 How. Pr. 296. 

lltots of this . In affidavit, Jordan v. Garrison, 6 How. Pr. 6. 

in of death. Re Potter, L. R., 8 Eq. Cas. 52. 

missionary . In will. Missionary Soc. v. Chapman, 128 Mass. 

265. 

Re Booth, II Wis. 516. 

affecting embassadors, other public ministers and consuls. 

In constitution. U. S,v. Ortega, 1 1 Wheat. 467. 

at law. In constitution. Gaston v, Babcock, 6 Wis. 504. 

in court. In statute. Wright v. Gilbert, 51 Md. 147. 

heretofore solely cognizable in a court of chancery . In statute. 



Gebhart v. Sattler, 40 Iowa, 1 52. 

— in law and equity arising tinder the '^ * * laws of the 



U. S. In constitution, U. S. v. Davidson, i Biss. 433; Osbornv. U. S., 
9 Wheat. 738 ; Home Ins. Co. v. North-western Packet, 32 Iowa, 223 ; 
Baker v. Biddle, Baldw. 394; Bains v. The James and Catharine, 
Baldw. 544, 

of a quasi criminal nature. In statute. Wiggins v, Chicago, 



68 111. 372. 

capital . In constitution. Cook v. State, 7 Blackf. 165, 

civil and criminal . In statute, Shultz v. Moore, Wright, 280. 

Barnard v. Whiting, 7 Mass. 359. 

In contract. Bliss v, Arnold, 8 Vt. 255 ; People v. Contracting Bd., 27 
N. Y. 378 ; Blair v, Wilson, 28 Gratt. 165. 

In notice of sale, Meng v. House r, 13 Rich. Eq. 210. 

In statute, Kitchell v, Jackson, 44 Ala. 302. 



CASH. 



57 



CA USE^ 



CASH — Continued. 

payment. Broughton v, SiHoway, 114 Mass. 71 ; Foley t/. Mason, 

6 Md. 37 ; Stewart z/. Scudder» 24 N. J. (L.) 96. 

sale. St. Louis Type Foundry v. Union Printing Co., 3 Mo. (App.) 

149. 

actual payment. In statute, Haggerty v, Foster, 103 Mas9. 19 ; 

Pierce v, Bryant, 5 Allen, 91. 

for . In deed. Mead v, McLaughlin, 42 Mo. 198. 

in . In contract, Gunter v, Sanchez, i Cal. 45. 

Burnham v, Webster, 19 Me. 232. 

dutiee of . In bond. Minor v, Mech. Bk. of Aleximdria, i Pet. 46. 

away. In statute, U. S. v, Johns, i Wash. 363 ; 4 Dall. 412 ; U. 

S. V, Vanraust, 3 Wash. 146. 

vote. In statute. People v. Rector, 48 Barb. 603. 



CAST. 



CASTEETG. 



CASUAIjTIES. In statute, Northardz^. Pepper, 17 C. B. (N. S.) 50. 

or oonsequenoeB of war or rebellion. In life insurance 

policy. Welts v. Conn. Mut. Life Ins. Co., 48 N. Y. 36. 

CATAIiOOUE. In statute, Strutt v, Robinson, 3 B. & Ad. 395. 

CATCHIKGS. In insurance policy. Rogers v. Mechanics' Ins. Co., i Story, C. C. 603. 

CATTLE. Decatur Bk. v. St. Louis Bk., 21 Wall. 294. 

In guaranty. Decatur Bk. v. St. Louis Bk., 21 Wall. 294. 

In statute. Child v, Hearn, L. R., 9 Ex. 176; Wright v. Pearson, L. 
R., 4 Q. B- 582 ; 4 B. & S. 726 ; Reg. v. Whitney, i Moody, 3 ; Rex 
V, Clarke, i Lewin, 229; Rex v. Paty, 2 W. Bl. 721 ; Rex v. Chappie, 
Russ. & Ry. 77 ; State v, Crenshaw, 22 Mo. 457 ; State v, Hamble- 
ton, 22 Mo. 453 ; State v, Clifton, 24 Mo. 376 ; Darling v. Rogers, 7 
Kas. 592 (note) ; Ohio R. Co. v, Brewster, 47 111. 462 ; U. S. v. Mat- 
tock, 2 Sawyer, 148; State v, Moreland, 27 Tex. 726. 

one pair of working . In statute. Bowzey v, Newbigin, 48 Me. 

410. 



CAUaA. 
CATTSE. 



Thomas v, Thomas, 2 Q. B. 851. 

Bleyew v, U. S., 13 Wall. 595; Mouton v. Noble, i La. Ann. 192. 

In statute. Mason v, Worrall Highway, 4 Q. B. Div. 459; Queen v, 
Searle, 5 El. & Bl. i. 

and procure to be administered. In statute, Le Beard v. 



People, 34 N. Y. 223. 

— of action. Bank of Commerce v. Rutland, etc., R. Co., 10 How. 



Pr. I ; Graham v. Scripture, 26 How. Pr. 501. 

In statute. Cherry v, Thompson, L. R., 7 Q. B. 573 ; Bennett v. Ew- 
ing, 4 Robt. 671 ; Cooke v. Gill, L. R., 8 C. P. 107 ; Durham v, 
Spence, L. R., 6 Ex.46; Scarborough v. Smith, 18 Kas. 399; Bonsey 
V. Wordsworth, 18 C. B. 325. 

of action surviving. In statute, Livermore v, Bainbridge, 49 N. 

Y. 125. 

of complaint. In statute. King v. Justices, 2 B. & Ad. 149 ; Rex 



V, Justices, 7 Q. B. 195. 

— of bis imprisonment. In statute. Spear v, Wardell, i N. Y. 



144. 



— shall be considered as abandoned. In statute, Koon v, Nichols 
8s 111. 155. 



S 



CA USE, 



58 



CERTIFICATE. 



OAUaB — Continued 



to be imported. In statute. Budenberg v, Roberts, L. R., 1 C. 

P. 575. 

due flhown. In stmtute. Re Mining Co., 12 Ch. Div. 325. 

Ibr . In statute. People v. Mayor, 19 Hun, 441. 

good . In contract. Cummer v, Betts, 40 Mich. 322 (29 Am. Rep. 

S30). 

same . In statute. Queen v, Morris, L. R., i C. C. R. 95. 

the- 
the- 



-. In reference. Samson v. Young, 50 N. H. 62. 

- of aotioxL In statute. Borthwick v. Walton, 15 C. R 502. 



CAUSED. 



OAUBES. 



CAVEAT. 



In statute. Palmer v. City of Concord, 48 N. H. 21 1. 

and procured. In plea. Farley v. Danks, 4 £1. & Bl. 498. 

In statute. Re Dean of York, 2 Q. B. i. 

-to be taken. In statute. Reg. v. Wilson, 7 Cox, C. C. 190. 

all oiyil and criminal. lu statute. U. S. v. Rhodes, i Abb. (U. 

.S.) 33. 
several of action. In statute. State v. Davis, 35 Mo. 406 ; Otis 

V. Mechanics' Bank, 35 Mo. 128. 

In statute. Stewart v. Austin, 9 Phi la. 141. 

emptor. Hargoust/. Stone, 5 N. Y. 73 ; Wright v. Hart, 18 Wend. 

449- 



CEASINQ. 



CEDO. 
CEDUIiE. 



venditor. Wright v. Hart, 18 Wend. 449. 

viator. Cornwall v. Commrs., 10 Ex. 771. 

to be thereon. In statute. Jordan v. Haskell, 63 Me. 189. 

to reside. In constitution. State v. Dilloway, 2 Vroom, 42. 

In will. Den v. Pearson, 16 N. J, (L.) 181. 
In deed. Mulford v. Le Franc, 26 Cal. 88. 
Campbell v. Nicholson, 3 La. Ann. 458. 



CELEBRATING. 



divine service. In statute. Coff v. Barber, L. R., 7 C. P. 



393- 



CEBTAIN. 



In statute. Hamilton v. St. (Jeorge, L. R., 9 Q. B. 42. 

In statute, Jenkins v. Andover, 103 Mass. 104 ; Queen v. Justices, 5 
El. & Bl. 703. 

cattle« In indictment. Rex. v. Chalkey, i Russ. & Ry. 259. 

a time. In contract. Duncombe v. Brighton Co., L. R., 10 Q. R 

372. 

any term or number of years . In statute. Pemberton v. Roe, 

7 B. & C. 2. 

twelve months . In contract. Langton v. Carleton, L. R., 9 

Ex. 57. 

CERTAINTY, moral . Com. «/. Costley, 118 Mass. i. 

CEBTIFICATE. Miller v. Larmon, 38 How. Pr. 417. 

In statute. VLoMtj v. McVey, 51 Mo. 406 ; Dalton v. Fenn,4o Mo. 109; 
U. S. V, Ambrose, 2 Fed. Rep. 556. 

of deposit. Hotchkiss v. Mosher, 48 N. Y. 478 ; National Bk. v. 

Washington Bk., 5 Hun, 605 ; Bank of Orleans v. Merrill, 2 Hill. 
295; Leavitt v. Palmer, 3 N. Y. 19; Talladega Ins. Co. v. Wood- 
ward, 44 Ala. 287 ; Charnley v. Dulels, 8 W. & S. 353 ; Lebanon Bk. 
V. Mangan, 28 Pa. St. 452; Bank of Peru v. Farnsworth, 18 111. 565 , 
Kilgore v. Bulkley, 14 Conn. 363; Carey v. McDougall, 17 Ga. 84; 



CERTIFICATE. 



59 



CHARACTER, 



CJiiKTiJi'lCATE — Continued. 

Laughlin v, Marshall, 19 III. 390; Gate v. Patterson, 2$ Mich. 191 ; 
VVelton V. Adams, 4 Cal. 37 ; Patterson v. Poindexter, 6 W. & S. 227. 

In statute, Sulton v. Savings Inst., 17 Wall. 109. 

CERTIFICATES. In will. Edmonson z/. Bloomshire, 1 1 Wall. 382. 



CERTIFIED. 

CERTIFY. 
CTTATRMATT. 

CHAMBERS. 



CHAHCE. 



CHANGE. 



CHAPTER. 



Security Bk. v. National Bk., 67 N. Y. 458. 

shall have . In contract, Roberts v, Mathews, 14 C. B. (N. S.) 592. 

foreman shall . In statute, McDonald v. State, 8 Mo. 283. 

of such respective meetings. In statute. West London R. Co. 

V, Bernard, 3 Q. B. 873. 

Pittsburg, etc., R. Co. v, Hurd, 17 Ohio St. 144. 

at his . Com. v, McLaughlin, 122 Mass. 449. 

Re Masters, i Dowl. P. C. 18; Findon v. Parker, 11 M. &. W. 675 ; 
Flight V, Leman, 4 Q. B. 883 ; Sedgwick v, Stanton, 14 N. Y. 289 ; 
Thallheimer V. Brinckerhoff, 3 Cow. 623 (15 Am. Dec. 318); Arden 
V, Patton, 5 Johns. Ch. 44; Meeksv. Denberry, 57 Ga. 273; Barnes 
7/. Strong, I Jones (Eq.), 100; HoUoway v, Lowe, 7 Port. 488; 
Wheeler v. Pounds, 24 Ala. 472 ; Quigley v. Thompson, 53 Ind. 317 ; 
Lathrop v, Amherst Bk., 9 Mete. 489; Ogden v, Des Arts, 4 Duer, 
275; Hovey v, Hobson, 51 Me. 62; Stanley v, Jones, 7 Bing. 369; 
Poe V, Davis, 29 Ala. 676; Thurston v, Percival, i Pick. 416; 
Brown v, Beauchamp, 5 T. B. Mon. 416 (17 Am. Dec. 81); Key z/. 
Vattier, i Ohio, 132 ; Rust v. Larue, 4 Litt. 417 ; Richardson v, Row- 
land, 40 Conn. 565 ; Duke v. Harper, 2 Mo. (App.) i. 

Goodman v, Cody, i Wash. 329 ; Turner v, Tuolumne Water Co., 25 
Cal. 397. 

verdict. In statute, Boyce v. Stage Co., 25 Cal. 460. 

White V, Brownell, 4 Abb. Pr. (N. S.) 162. 

bill or ticket. In statute. State v, Fisk, 3 Sneed, 695. 

of grade. Warren v, Henley, 31 Iowa, 31. 

of possession. In insurance policy, Sherman v, Niagara, etc., 

Ins. Co., 46 N. Y. 526 (7 Am. Rep. 380). 

of title. In insurance policy, Hartford Ins. Co. v, Walsh, 54 111. 

164; Ayres v, Hartford, etc., Ins. Co., 17 Iowa, 176; 21 Iowa, 193; 
Keelerz/. Niagara, etc., Ins. Co., 16 Wis. 523; Tillou v, Kingston, 
etc., Ins. Co., 5 N. Y. 405; Dreher v, Mtn?i Ins. Co., 18 Mo. 128; 
Orrell v, Hampden, etc., Ins. Co., 13 Gray, 431 ; Hartford, etc. Ins. 
Co. V, Ross, 23 Ind. 179. 

in title or possession. In insurance policy. Card v, Phceniz 

Ins. Co., 4 Mo. (App.) 426. 

in use. In insurance policy, Cannell v. Phoenix Ins. Co., 59 

Me. 582. 

its original purpose. In constitution, Harrison v, Goudy, 57 

Ala. 50. 

the form or grotind of action. In statute, Spencer v, Howe, 



26 Conn. 201. 

such . In statute. Mutual Ins. Co. v. Watts, i Wheat, 280. 

In statute, Hufi v. Alsup, 64 Mo. 51. 

K node z/. Williamson, 17 Wall. 586; King z/. Hardy, 24 How. St. Tr. 
1079; Queen v, Rowton, 34 L. J. 57 ; Leverick v, Frank, 6 Oreg. 212. 

person of good . In statute. Leader i/. Yell, 16 C. B. (N. S.) 590. 



' 



CHARACTER. 6o CHARITABLE. 



— Continued. 

women of proTioiuly ohaste . In statute. State v. Prizes 49 

Iowa, 531 (31 Am. Rep. 155); Andre v. State, 5 Iowa, 389; Boak v. 
State, 5 Iowa, 430; State v, Carron, 18 Iowa, 372 ; Carpenter v. Peo- 
ple, 8 Barb. 603 ; Crozier v. People, i Park. C. C. 453 ; Saflford v. 
People. I Park. C. C. 474 ; People v. Kenyon, 5 Park. C. C. 254 ; 
Kenyon v. People, 26 N. Y. 203 ; State v. Shean, 32 Iowa, 88. 

In statute, Schriefer v. Wood, 5 Blatchf. 215. 

CHABGE Merchants' Ex. Bk. v. Com. W. Co., 49 N. Y. 635 ; Dillon v. Barnard 

21 Wall. 430. 

In statute. Grant t/. Connecticut Ins. Co., 29 Wis. 126; Millard v. 
Lyons, 25 Wis. 516; Emmanuel v. Bridges, L. R., 9 Q. B. 286; Doe 
V, Leland, 4 B. & Ad. 144. ; Lee v, Hutchinson, 8 C. B. 22. 

and aooii8e« In indictment. Com. v. O'Brien, 12 Cush. 90. 

at law. In statute, Fearne v. Wilson, 6 B. & C. 86. 

or oonduot. In statute. Beilby v, Scott, 7 M. & W. 100. 

in of. In statute. Local Bd. v, Bisshoff, 2 C. P. Div. 187. 

person in . In statute. Ex parte Ferguson, L. R., 6 Q. B. 280. 

OHARGEABIiE. In statute, Walbridge v, Walbridge, 43 Vt. 617 ; re Morton, 5 Q. B, 

591 ; Town of Beacon Falls t/. Seymour, 44 Conn. 214; ^ueen v. In- 
habitants, 3 Q. B. 790; 3 B. & S. 152. 

thereby. In statute. Whippy v. Hillary, 3 B. & Ad. 400. 

actually . In statute, Bardwell v, Purrington, 107 Mass. 419. 

GHABGED. In indictment. Brazier v, SUte, 44 Ala. 387. 

In statute. Queen v. Inhabitants, 15 Q. B. 4cx>. 

with a capital crime. In statute. State v, Duncan, 9 Port. 260. 

with crime. In statute. Day v. Inhabitants of Otis, 8 Allen, 

471. 
with crime and confined in jaiL In statute, Mary t^. State, s 

Mo. 71. 

with murder. In statute. Rex v, Maynard, i Russ. & Ry. 240. 



other annuity on such landa. In statute, Walford v, Marchant 

2B. &Ad. 315. 

In statute, Copeland v, Bartlett, 6 C. B. 26. 

of imprisonment. In statute. Inhabitants of Townsend v, 

Walcutt, 3 Mete. 154. 

or disbnrsementB at law. In statute, Wardle v, Nicholson, 4 



B. & Ad. 474. 

coBtB or . In contract. Green v, Jones, 78 N. C. 265. 

professional . In statute, Reg. v. Priest, 16 Q. B. 44. 

CHABTFABLE. Adye v. Smith, 44 Conn. 70. 

In statute. Town of Hamden v. Rice, 24 Conn. 351. 

allowance. In statute. Queen v. Mayor, 2 Q. B. 695. 

corporation. American Asylum v, Phcenix Bank, 4 Conn. 172 

(10 Am. Dec. 112). 

institutions. In statute. Convention v. Portland, 65 Me. 92. 

or benevolent institutions. In statute. Appeal Tax Court v. 



St. Peter's Academy, 50 Md. 321. 

— uses. In statute. Doe v. Hawthorn, 2 B. & Aid. 104; Drury v. 



CHARITABLE. 



6z 



CHILD. 



CELABSnSB. 



CHABTTABIiE ~ Continued. 

Inhabitants, lo Allen, 169; Jackson v, Phillips, 14 Allen, 539; 
Saltonstall v. Sanders, 11 Allen, 446; Owens v. Missionary Soc, 14 
N. Y. 380. 

In will. Dolan v, MacDermott, L. R., 5 Eq. Cas. 60. 

Taylor v. Keep, 2 Bradw. 368; Jones v. Williams, 2 Ambler, 651; 
Gerke v, Purcell, 25 Ohio St. 229 ; Morice v. Bishop of Durham, 9 
Ves. 399; Ould V. Washington Hospital, 5 Otto, 317. 

neoessity or . In statute. Doyle v. L. & B. R. R., 1 18 Mass. 195. 

purely \ publio . In constitution. Orphan Asylum v. School 



CHATTELS. 



CHEAT. 



:i:^M 



[CAL. 



W. 



:i:>i:f»i:«:4 



»j : 1 1 M : 



CHIIiD. 



.Y. 



Dist., 90 Pa. St. 21. 

to a ship. Saville v. Champion, 2 B. & Aid. 507. 

Ashley v. Cornwall, 2 Munf. 268 ; Lidgett v. Williams, 4 Hare, 
462 ; Spring v. Gray, 6 Peters, 151. 

In statute. Ashley v, Cornwall, 2 Munf. 268 ; Rein v. Lane, 8 B. & S. 

83. 

Barr v, Bonford, 6 Blackf. 535 ; McLean v. Rockey, 3 McLean, 235 ; 
Pippin V. Ellison, 12 Ired. (L.) 61 ; Bernett v. Pittsburg, etc., Co., 
47 Barb. 104; Putnam v. Westcott, 19 Johns. 73. 

In stutute. Smith v. Wilcox, 24 N. Y. 353 ; Hall v. SUte, 3 Ohio St. 

575 ; Reg. V. Denny, i Jebb. 255. 
People V. Babcock, 7 Johns. 201 ; People v. Johnson, 12 Johns. 292; 

People V. Miller, 14 Johns. 371 ; Odiorne v. Bacon, 6 Cush. 185. 

and defraud. In indictment. State v. Parker, 43 N. H. 83; 

Com. V. Eastman, i Cush. 191 ; Com. v, Wallace, 16 Gray, 223. 

hinder and delay. In statute. Burgert v. Borchert, 59 Mo. 80. 



Smith V. Branch Bk., 7 Aki. 800 ; re Brown, 2 Story, 502 ; Lester v. 
Given, 8 Bush, 357 ; National Bk. v. Henderson, 46 Ga. 487 ; State 
V. Crawford, 13 La. Ann. 300 ; People v. Howell, 4 Johns. 296 ; Bul- 
lard V. Randall, i Gray, 605 ; Bowen v. Newell, 5 Sandf. 326 ; Barnet 
V. Smith, 30 N. H. 256; liarker v, Anderson, 21 Wend. 372. 

In statute. Oulton v. Savings Inst., 17 Wall. 109; Thompson v. State, 
49 Ala. 16. 

paid by . In contract. Church v. Pontifex, 9 C. B. 248. 

diflooveries. Tyler v, Boston, 7 Wall. 327. 

oil. In insurance policy. Mack v. National Fire Ins. Co., 24 Hun, 



575. 
In statute. Apothecaries Co. v. Greenough, i Q. B. 798. 

land. Ephraim v. Garlick, 10 Kas. 280. 

in question. In statute. Thomas v. Davies. 8 Ad. & Ell. 601. 

Bartley v. Richtmeyer, 4N. Y. 38; Irwin v. Dearman, 11 East, 23; 
Edmonson v. Marshall, 2 Dum. & E. 4 ; Fernslee v. Moyer, 3 W. & 
S. 416; Bracy v. Kibbe, 31 Barb. 273; Sharp v. Cropsey, 11 Barb. 
224; Williams v. Hutchinson,. 5 Barb. 122; 3 N. Y. 312; Kent v. 
Barker, 2 Gray, 536 ; Bigelow v. Morong, 103 Mass. 289. 

In deed. Sewall v. Roberts, 1 1 5 Mass. 262. 

In statute. Blackburn v. State, 22 Ohio St. 102 ; Hardcastle v. Jones, 

3 B. & S. 160; Dickinson's Appeal, 42 Conn. 491; McGregor v. 

State, 2 Tex. L. J. 168 ; Dickinson v. R. Co.. 2 H. & C. 736. 

In will. Doe v. Davies, 4 B. & Ad. 43; Ingraham v. Meade, 3 Wall. 
Jr. 32; Feit v. Vanatta, 21 N. J. (Eq.) 84 ; Willis v. Jenkins, 30 Ga. 



CITIZEN. 64 CIVIL. 

CITIZEN ~ Continued. 

486; Davis V. Hall, i Nott & M. 292; Lasportas v. De La Motta 
10 Rich. (Eq.) 35 ; U. S. v. Darnaud, 3 Wall. Jr. 171. 

In consiitulion. Re Henry, 40 N. Y. 560; Thomason v. State, 15 Ind. 
449; Karrahoo v, Adams, i Dill. 344; Minor z/. Happersett, 21 Wall. 
162 ; Smith v. Moody, 26 Ind. 299 : U. S» v. Canter. 2 Bond, 389 ; Tatem 
V. Wright, 23 N. J. (L.) 429; People v, Imlay, 20 Barb. 68 ; Paul v, 
Virginia, 8 Wall. 168 ; Dred Scott v, Sandford, 19 How. 393 ; Cov- 

. ington Drawbridge Co. v. Shepherd, 20 How. 234; Ohio &Miss. R. 
R. V. Wheeler, i 31. 286 ;^ioOp. Atty.-Geii. 382 ; McKay v, Campbell. 
5 Am. L. T. Rep. 417 ; 7 Op. Atty.-Gen. 746 ; Western Union Tel. Co- 
V, Dickinson, 49 Ind. 444 ; Ins. Co. v. New Orleans, i Wood^ 85 ; • 
Catlett V. Keith, i Paine. 594 ; U. S. v. Rhodes ,1 Abb. (U. S.) 28 ; Ex 
parte v. Turner, Chase Dec. 157; U. S. v, Cruikshank, 2 Otto, 542 ; 
The Pizarro, 2 Wheat. 227. As to corporations : Bank v. Deveaux, 
5 Cranch, 61 ; Hope Ins. Co. v, Boardman, 5 Cranch, 57 ; Sullivan 
V. Fulton Steamboat Co., 6 Wheat. 450 ; Breithaupt v. Bank, i Pet. 
238; Bank v, Earle, 13 Pet. 519; Commercial, etc.. Bank v. SIo- 
comb, 14 Pet. 60; Irvine v, Lowry, 14 Pet 293; Kirkpatrick v. 
White, 4 Wash. C. C. 595 ; Bank v, Willis, 3 Sumn. 472 ; Com. v. 
Milton, 12 B. Mon. 212; Louisville, etc., R. Co. t/. Letson, 2 How. 
497; Ru'ndle v. Delaware, etc., R. Co., 14 How. 80; Marshall v, Bal- 
timore, etc., R. Co., 16 How. 314; Lafayette Ins. Ca v, French, 18 
How. 404; Warren Man. Co. v. Etna Ins. Co., 2 Paine, 501 ; Paul v. 
Virginia, 8 Wall. 168 ; Ins. Co. v. City of New Orleans, i Woods, 85. 

In statute, McKenzie v. Murphy, 24 Ark. 155: State v. Trustees, 11 
Ohio, 24; Cobbs v, Coleman, 14 Tex. 594; Case v, Clarke, 5 Mason« 
70 ; Curd i/. Letcher, 3 J. J. Marsh. 445 ; Field v. Adreon, 7 Md. 209 ; 
Risewick v, Davis, 19 Md. 82; McKenzie v. Murphy, 24 Ark. 155; 
re Welhitz, 16 Wis. 445. 

— of the State and of the United States. In constitution. Opin* 
ion of the Judges, 32 Conn. 563. ^ 

of B. In agreement. Union Hotel Co. «/. Heisel, 79 N. Y. 454. 



U. S. V. Darnaud, 3 Wall. Jr. 171. 

•CITY. Mayor of London v. Long, i Camp. 20; Fitz v. City of Boston, 4 

Cush. 366; Vi liars 7'. Kennedy, 5 La. Ann. 724; Burke v. Monroe 
Co., ^^ in. 6io; Queen v. Inhabitants, 12 Q. B. 161. 

In statute, Allen v. People, 84 111. 502 ; People v. Common Council, 
84 111. 157. 

engineer. In contract. Palmer v, Clark, 106 Mass. 388. 

officer. People v, Wright. 70 III. 388. 

of London. In contract, Mai Ian v. May, 13 M. & W. 511. 

CIVIL. In statute, Applegate v. Com., 7 B. Mon. 12. 

action. Ijt statute, Kyle v, Kyle, 55 Ind. 387 ; People v. Hamil- 
ton, 39 N. Y. 107; U. S. V, 10,000 Cigars, i Woolw. 123; State t^. 
Messmore, 14 Wis. 125 ; James v, Lynn, 13 Q. B. 846 ; Chase v. In- 
galls, 97 Mass. 524; Bowers v, Bobb, 45 Cal. 495 ; ex parte Smith, 
53 Cal. 204; re Scott, 15 Cal. 220; Smith v, Richmond, 19 Cal. 481 ; 
Humiston v. Smith, 21 Cal. 129; Garner v, Gordon, 41 Ind. 92; 
Bond V, Fay, i Allen, 211; Coates v, Chillicothe Bk., 23 Ohio St. 415 ; 
Lucas V. Lucas, 3 Gray, 136 ; Gray v. Thrasher, 104 Mass. 373^ 

actions. In statute, Rison v. Cribbs, i Dill. 181 ; Ten Thousand 

Cigars, i Woolw. 123; Livingston v. Story, 9 Pet. 632 ; Davenport 



CIVIL. 65 CLAIMANT. 

CIVIL— Continued. 

V. Holland, 3 Cush. 13 ; Brooks v. Howard, 55 N. H. 69; Howard y. 
Proprietors, 12 Cush. 259. 

action or prooeeding. In statute. Com. v. Intoxicating 

Liquors, 14 Gray, 37$ \ Hosmer 7/. Warner 15 Gray, 46. 

» 

00800. In constitution. People v, Johnson, 30 Cal. 98; Lalce 

Erie, etc., R. Co. v. Heath, 9 Ind. 550; Norristown, etc.. Turnpike 
Co. V, Burket, 26 Ind. 53. 

Ik statute. State v. Judge, 15 La. 192; Crimball v. Ross, T. U. P. 
Charlt. 175 ; Osmond v. Flournoy, 34 Ga. 509. 

oases both in law and in equity. In statute, Ellis v. Hatfield, 

20 Ind. loi ; Herron v, Herron, 16 Ind. 126; Ewing v. Swing, 24 
Ind. 468. 

oanae. In constitution. Dow v. Norris,4 N. H. 16; City Council 

V. Com., 90 Pa. St. 498 ; Withers v. State, 36 Ala. 252. 

oaiuea. In statute. Gilbert v. Thomas, 3 Ga. 575; Sweet v. 

Sherman, 21 Vt. 23; Maloney v. People, 38 111. 62; Mann v. People, 
35 111. 467 ; Allison v. People, 45 111. 37 ; Walker v. State, 6 Blackf. i. 

imposition. Harvard College v. Aldermen, 104 Mass. 470. 

law. In constitution. Jennison v. Warmack, 5 La. 493. 

office. In constitution. State v. Valle, 41 Mo. 29. 

— prooeeding. Wilbur v. Crane, 13 Pick. 284; Hyde v. Chapin, 2 
Cush. 77; Cummings 2/. Hodgson, 13 Mete. 246; Hawes t/. Gustin, 
2 Allen, 402 ; Chapel v. White, 3 Cush. 577 ; Young v. Makepeace, 
103 Mass. 50; Hills v. Wells, 6 Pick. 104. 

proooM. In statute. Queen v. Governor, 6 B. & S. 371. 

^prosecution. Cancemi v. People, 18 N. Y. 128; U. S. v. Three 



Tons of Coal, 6 Biss. 379. 
— Buitu Cancemi v. People, 18 N. Y. 128. 
Stoughton V. Taylor, 2 Paine, 665. 



Coster z'. Mayor of Albany, 43 N. Y. 399; People v. Frisbie, 31 Cal. 
146 ; Scott V. Pirley, 98 Mass. 514 ; Lawrence v. Miller, 2 N. Y. 245 ; 
Jackson v. Losee, 4 Sandf. Ch. 381 ; K needier v. Steinberg, 10 How. 
Pr. 72. 

In constitution. Fordyce v. Goodman, 13 Ohio St. i. 

In statute. Gray v. Palmer, 9 Cal. 616; Pette v. Shipley, 46 Cal. 160: 
Queen v. Guardians, L. R., 9 Q. B. 383 ; Fellows v. Clay, 4 Q. B. 
319; Camp V. Grant, 21 Conn. 54; McCausland's Estate, 52 Cal. 
568 ; Orvis v. Jennings, 6 Daly, 434 ; Kelley v, Madison, 43 Wis. 638 ; 
U. S. V. Wilcox, 4 Blatchf. 385. 

advene to the estate of the petitioner. In statute. Benoist 

V. Marvin, 47 Mo. 537. 

existing in jbvor of a defendant. In statute. Bates v. Rose- 



krans, 37 N. Y. 409. 

— or demand. In statute. Stringham v. Supervisors, 24 Wis. 594. 

— upon the United StateB. Dowell v. Cardwell, 4 Sawy. 217. 



under whom they . In deed. Williamson v. Hall, 62 Mo. 405. 

Adams v. Wairill, 46 Ga. 295. 

In statute. Stewart v. Ball, 35 Mo. 209; Gray v. Palmer, 9 Cal. 616; 
U. 9. V Benecke, 8 Otto, 447. 





CLAIMANT. 



66 



CLERK. 



CTiATMATTT ^ Continued. 

of publio land. In statute. Railroad v. Tevis, 41 Cal. 489. 



OTiATlTTNQ. 



GLAIMa 



U. S. V. Beuckc, 8 Otto, 447. 

under a mortgage. In statute. Doe z\ Massey, 17 Q. B. 376. 

all under him. In deed, Williamson v. Hall, 62 Mo. 405. 

any person property. In statute, Abernathy v. Whitehead^ 

69 Mo. 28. 

Indeed, Ludington v, Pulver, 6 Wend. 404; Fol Hard t/. Wallace, 2 
Johns. 395 ; Aberdeen v. Blackmar, 6 Hill, 324 ; Lloyd v, Dimmock, 
26 W. R. 458. 

Ik statute. State v. Draper, 48 Mo. 56; Dekalb v. Smith, 47 Ala. 
407; Olcott V, Wood, 14 N. Y. 32; Fallon v, Butler, 21 Cal. 24; 
Ellis V, Polhemus, 27 Cal. 350. 

and alleges. Jk affidavit, Amory v, Amory, 26 Wis. 152. 

and demands in law and equity. In deed, Fowle v, Welsh, i 

B. & C. 34. 

of the State. In constitution. Darby v, Wright, 3 Blatchf. 172. 

. In plea, Douglas t/. Beasley, 40 Ala. 142. 



OIiAUDBBTnTELY. 
CLASS. — 



provided. In statute. King v. Inhabitants, 10 B. & C. 12. 

of persons. In statute, St. Mary Magdalen v, Atty.-Gen^ 6 H. 

L. Cas. 189. 

Spencer v. Colt, 89 Pa. St. 314. 

In contract. Harper v. Pound, 10 Ind. 32. 

In will. Hodgworth v. Crawley, 2 Atk. 376. 

annual value. In statute. Marsh v, Hammond, 103 Mass. 149* 

deed. In contract, Rohr v, Kindt, 3 W. & S. 563. 

of all enlarges and assessments whatsoever. In deed. Peart 

Phipps, 4 Yeates, 386. 

of all inoumbranoes. In contract. Porter v. Noyes, 2 Greenl. 

22 (i I Am. Dec. 30). 
prooeeds of all fines. In constitution. State v, Casey, 5 Wis. 



322. 



title. In deed. Roberts v Bassett, 105 Mass. 409 ; Dresel v. Jor- 

' dan, 104 Mass. 407. 

yearly value. Tyrconnel v. Ancaster. 2 Ves. 449. 

in the . In deed. Tucker v, Howard, 122 Mass. 529.. 

— days. In statute, Hodgins v. Hancock, 14 M. & W. 121. 



cleabhtg. 

CIiEABLY. 



tour 

ten days. In statute. King v. Justices, 3 B. & Aid. 581 ; Rex v. 

West Riding, 4 B. & Ad. 600. 
to . Harper v. Pound, 10 Ind. 32 ; Winter v, Peterson, 24 N. J. 

(L.) 524. 

In contract, Pettit v, Mitchell, 4 M. & G. 838. 

and explicitly stated. In statute, Taylor v, Nesfield, 3 El. & 

Bl. 728. 
appears by the will. In statute, Wilcutt v, Colman, 98 Mass. 76. 

error. Speed v, Hann, i T. B. Mon. 16 (15 Am. Dec. 78). 



Sickles V. Walker, 20 Wend. 72 (30 Am. Dec. 520) ; U. S. v. McCor- 
mick, I Cranch C. C. 600. 

In indictment. Rex v, Jenson, i Moody, 434. 



CLERK. 



67 



COAL. 



— Continued. 

In statute, Reg. v. Turner, 11 Cox, C. C. 552 ; Reg. v. Carr, Russ. A 
Ry. 198; Reg. v. Hall, 13 Cox, C. C. 49; Reg. v. Moyle. 11 Cox, C. 
C. 150 ; Reg. V. Tite. 8 Cox, C. C. 458 ; Reg. v, Bailey, 12 Cox, C. C. 
56 ; Reg. V. Bowers, L. R., i C. C. R. 41 ; Re^:. v, Negus, L. R.. 2 C. 
C. R. 34; ex parte Record, 11 Neb. 287 ; Stale v. Whitehouse, 50 N. 
H. 251; People V, Tax Commrs., 73 N. Y. 437; State 2/. Olin, 23 
Wis. 316; The Short Cut, 6 Fed. Rep. 630 ; Chambers v. Bridge 
Manufacturing Co., 16 Kas. 270. 

or servant. In statute. Queen v. Bowers, L. R., i C. C. R. 44 ; 

Queen v. Tyree, L. R., i C. C. R. 177; Queen v. Negus, L. R., 2 C. 
C. R. 35. 

sleeps in the store. In insurance policy, Frisbie v, Fayette, 



GUBNT 



CI1O8INO. 



GLOITD. 



OOAI.. 



etc.. Ids. Co., 27 Pa. St. 325. 

ohief . In statute. Queen v, Greenland, L. R., i C. C. R. 68. 

oompetent . In resolution of Legislature, Tenney v. State, 27 

Wis. 387. 

court having a . In statute. State v, Webster, 7 Neb. 469. 



government 
insurance — 



'. In deed. Grant v, Shaw, L. R., 7 Q. B. 700. 
In deed. Grant v, Shaw, L. R., 7 Q. B. 700. 



In statute, Croso v, Riggins, 50 Mo. 335 ; McCreary v, Hoopes, 25 
Miss. 428. 

Clarice v. Tinker, 10 Q. B. 604; Wright v, Bennett, 4 HI. 258 ; Cox v. 
Glue, 5 C. B. 550. 

In plea. Porter v. Aldrich, 39 Vt. 326. 

a bargain. In power, Coleman v, Garrgues, 18 Barb. 60. 

gaoL In statute, Steere v. Field, 2 Mason, 326. 

this ailUr. In letter, Patton v. Ash, 7 S. & R. 1 16. 

on Sunday. In statute, Kurtz v. People, 33 Mich. 279. 

shall be . In statute, Kurtz v. People, 33 Mich. 279. 

account. Bass v. Bass, 8 Pick. 187. 

out. In contract, Kingsbury v, Kerwin, 43 N. Y, (S. C.) 451. 

my linen and of all kinds. In will. Hunt v, Hort, 3 Brown 

Ch. 311. 

upon title. Ward v, Dewey, 16 N. Y. 519; Scott v, Onderdonlc, 



14 N. Y. 9; Allen v. City of Buffalo, 39 N. Y. 390; Fonda v. Sage, 
48 N. Y. 173; Marsh v. City of Brooklyn, 59 N. Y. 280; Bissell v, 
Kellogg, 60 Barb. 617; Lyon v. Hunt, 11 Ala. 295; Andersons. 
Hooks, 9 Ala. 704; Huntington v. Allen, 44 Miss. 654; Hartford v, 
Chipman, 21 Conn. 488; San xay t/. Hunger, 42 Ind. 44; Moore t/. 
Cord, 14 Wis. 213; Gamble v. Loop, 14 Wis. 465; Dunklin Co. v. 
Clark, 51 Mo. 60; Lick v, Ray, 43 Cal. 83. 

hackney . In city ordinance. Snyder v. North Lawrence, 8 Kas. 

82. 

stage . In statute. Queen v, Ruscoe, 8 Ad. h Ell. 387. 

In statute. Cincinnati, etc., Tp. Co. v, Neil, 9 Ohio, 11. 

and chariots. In statute. Frost v, Williams, 7 Ad. & Ell. 773. 

In insurance policy, Howard v. Great Western Ins. Co., 109 Mass. 384. 
In statute, Bowes v. Lord Ravensworth, 1 5 C. B. 522. * 
mines. In statute. King v. Inhabitants, 2 B. & Ad. 73. 



COALS. 



68 



COLLISION. 



GOALS. 

OOABT. 
OOABTnrG. 

CX>ABTWISB. 
O. O. D. 



CX>EBCIOH. 



In statute. Mayor v. Parkinson, lo C. B. 229. 

worked out. In lease, Cartwright v. Forman, 7 R & S. -243. 

In statute. Bennett v. Morta, Holt, N. P., 360. 

trade. /« statute. Steamboat Co. v. Livingston, 3 Cow. 713 ; U. 

S. V. The James Morrison, i Newb. 241 ; U. S. v. The William Pope, 
I Newb. 259. 

plymg . In statute. San Francisco v. Steam Nav. Co., 10 Cal. 504 

In express receipt. Collender v. Dinsmore, 55 N. Y. 201 ; U. S. Ex. Co. 
V. Keifer, 59 Ind. 623; American, etc., Ex. Co. v. Schier, 55 111. 140; 
American Ex. Co. v. Lesem, 39 111. 312 ; Gibson v. American, etc., 
Ex. Co., I Hun, 387. 

Boyse v. Bossburgh, 6 H. L. Cas. 2. 

in Ibot. Peyser v. Mayor, 70 N. Y. 497. 

by law. Peyser v. Mayor, 70 N. Y. 497. 

OOGVIZAKOB. Burder v. Veley, 12 Ad. & Ell. 259. 

ftdl . In statute, Webster v. Com.. 5 Cash. 386. 

CK3HABIT. Calef 7/. Calef, 54 Me. 365. 

together as husband and wiib. In statute. Sullivan v. State, 

32 Ark. 190. 

OOHABTPATIOK. Pollock v. Pollock, 71 N. Y. 135 ; Dunn v. Dunn, 4 Paige, 425 , 

Yardley's Estate, 25 Smith (Pa.), 207 ; Ohio v. Conaway, Tappan, 90. 

COrN*. In indictment. Com. v. Gallagher, 16 Gray^ 241. 

money. In constitution. Griswold v. Hepburn, 2 Duv. 20 ; 8 

Wall. 603 ; Thayer v. Hedges, 22 Ind. 282. 

otherwise than in current . In statute. Archer v. James, 2 B. 

& S. 76. 

gold, silver and oopper. In statute. Crocker v. Redfield, 4 



oonrs. 



COLD. 
OOLIiATliBAIi. 



Blatchf. 378. 

— weather. In contract. Belden v. Woodmansee, Si'lU. 25. 
proceeding. Moore v. Neil, 39 111. 256. 

— promise. Elder v. Warfield, 7 H. & J. 391. 

— security. Shoemaker v. Nat. Bk. 2 Abb. (U. S.) 416. 



CK3LLATIOK 



OOUEiEGTED. 



In statute. Gilchrist v. Gottschalk, 39 Iowa, 311. 

Destrehan v. Destrehan, 16 Mart. 557. 

In statute. Fling z/. Goodell, 40 N. H. 219; State v. Moeller, 48 Mo. 
331. 

In will. Going v. Emery, 16 Pick. 107 (26 Am. Dec. 645). 

Fitzpatrick v. Flagg, 6 Abb. Pr. 213. 
COLLECTIBIiE. In guaranty. McDoal v. Yeomans, 8 Watts, 361. 

if said note is In guaranty. French v. Marsh, 29 Wis. 649. 

COLLECnOH. In guaranty. Dyer v. Gibson. 16 Wis. 559. 

In statute. Rawlins v. Pointdexter, 27 Miss. 64. 

for . In note. Sweeny v. Easter, i Wall. 166. 

In statute. Patapsco Female Inst. v. Rock Hill College, 51 Md. 470. 

and academies. In statute. State v. Ross, 24 N. J. (L.) 479. 

In deed. Carey v. Bright, 58 Pa. St. 70. 

Wright V. Brown, 4 Ind. 95 ; The City of Baltimore, 5 Ben. 474 ; The 
Moxey, Abb. Adm. 73. 



COLLEGE. 
OOLLBGBB. 
OOLUEBY. 
COLLI8IOK. 



COLLUSION, 



69 



COMMENCEMENT. 



COLLUSION. 



COLOR. 



In plea. Batterbury v, Vyse, 2 H. & C. 44. 

In statute. Gill v. Gas Co., L. R., 7 Ex. 336. 

of his oi&oe. In statute. Griffiths v, Hardenberg, 41 N. Y. 464; 

Cornell v. Dakin, 38 N. Y. 255 ; Wilson v. Unseltt, 12 Bush, 215. 

of title. Bernal v. Glim, 33 Cal. 668 ; Beverly v. Burke, 9 Ga. 



440; Field V. Boynton, 33 Ga. 239; St. Louis v, Gorman, 29 Me. 593; 
Hamilton v, Wright, 30 Iowa, 480; Brooks v, Bruyn, 35 111. 394; 
Hodges V, Eddy, 38 Vt. 327 : Edgerton v. Bird, 6 Wis. 527 ; Tate v. 
Southard, 3 Hawks. 119(14 Am. Dec. 578) ; Farley v. Smith, 39 Ala. 
38; Field V, Columbet, 4 Sawy. 523; Litchfield v, Johnson, 4 Dill. 
551 ; League v, Atchison, 6 Wall. 112. 

In statute. Mylar v, Hughes, 60 Mo. 105 ; Davila v. Mumford, 24 How. 
214^ Wright V, Mattison, 18 How. 50; McClellan v. Kellogg, 17 111. 
498 ; Christy v, Alford, 17 How. 601 ; Osterman v, Baldwin, 6 Wall. 
1 16 ; Field v. Columbet, 4 Sawyer, 524. 

' or preteDBO of prooees. In statute. King v, Cnsp, i B. & Aid. 

287. 

by of any fUse token or writing. In statute. State z^. Chumm, 

19 Mo. 233. 

on aooount of 



person of 



OOLOBED. 
OOMBININa. 



— . Railroad Co. v. Brown, 17 Wall. 445. 

In statute. State v, Watters, 3 Ired. 455 ; State v. 
Melton, Bush. 49; State v. Dempsey, 9 Ired. (L.) 384; Heim v. 
Bridault, 37 Miss. 209 ; Johnson v, Norwich, 29 Conn. 407. 

men. Pauska v, Daus, 31 Tex. 67. 

any mode of . In patent taw. Case v. Brown, 2 Wall. 320. 

to. In statute, Shippen v. Izard, i S. & R. 224. 

by desoent. In statute. Gardner v. Collins, 2 Pet. 69. 



OOICFOBT. In statute. Eskridge v, Ditmars, 51 Ala. 254. 

OOICFOBTABLE. good and support and maintenanoe. In will. Conant v. 

Stratton, 107 Mass. 474. 

and residing within this state. In statute. Burlington v. Calais, 

I Vt. 385 (18 Am. Dec. 691). 

or returning within the state. In statute. Mazozon v. Foot, 



ooMnra. 



I Aikens, 282 (15 Am. Dec. 679). 

to settle. In statute. King v. Churchwardens, 6 B. & C. 73 ; 

King V. Inhabitants, 3 B. & Ad. 545. 

COMMENCE. or prosecute any action. In statute. Re Flint, i B. & C. 255. 

COMMENCED. In plea. Mayo i/. Rogers, 14 East. 539. 

In statute. Isaacs v. Price, 2 Dill. 347 ; State Bk. v. Bates, 10 Ark. 
120; Johnson v. Farwell, 7 Me. 370; Gosline v. Thompson, 61 Mo. 
471 ; Hail v. Spencer, i R. I. 17, Parker v. Concord, 2 N. H. 227; 
Pindell v. Maydell, 7 B. Mon. 314. 

and sued. In statute. Johnson v. Farwell, 7 Me. 370 (22 

Am. Dec. 203). 

COMMENCING. from. In deed. Hopkins v. Helmore, 8 Ad. & Ell. 463. 

OOMMXNCEMENT. of the action. In statute. Adams v. Patterson, 35 Cal. 

122; Peck V. Randall, i Johns. 165 ; Taylor v. Taylor, i A. K. Marsh. 
18; Beekman v. Scatterlee, 5 Cow. 519; Robinson v. Burleigh, 5 

N. H. 225. 

of the prosecution. In statute. Ross v. State, 55 Ala. 177. 



People V. Clark, 33 Mich. 112. 



COMMERCE, 



70 



COMMON. 



GO] 



■ :4:fw 



GO] 



%:i%j\\*%\ 



People V, Brooks, 4 Den. 469 ; Smith v. Turner, 7 How. 392 ; U. S. v. 
Holliday, 3 Wall. 417; Padelford v. Mayor. 14 Ga. 438; People v, 
Raymond, 34 Cal. 492 ; Western Union Tel. Co. v, Atlantic, etc.. 
Tel. Co., 5 Nev. 102 ; Council Blufifs v, Kansas City R. Co., 44 Iowa, 
338 ; Commercial Bk. v. Kansas City, etc., R. Co., 45 Iowa, 338. 

regulate . In constitution. Gibbons v. Ogden, 9 Wheat, i ; Wel- 

ton V, State, 91 U. S. 275 ; Sears v, Warren Co., 36 Ind. 267 ; Steam- 
boat Co. V. Livingston, 3 Cow. 713; Groves v. Slaughter, 15 Pet. 
511 ; Hanigan v, Connecticut Lumber Co., 129 Mass. 580; State v. 
Randolph, i Mo. (App.) 16. 

brokers. In statute. Slack v. Tucker, 23 Wall. 321. 

— oorporations. Sweatt v, Hartford, etc., R. Co., 3 Clifi. 339. 

— paper. In statute. Re Clemens, 2 Dill. 533; re Nickodemus. 3 



Bank. Reg. 230; re Chandler, i Lowell, 478; 4 Lowell, 213; re 
Sykes, 5 Biss. 113. 

—purpose. In statute. Morris v. Walker, 15 Q. B. 598. 



OOMMIS8IOH. U. S. v. Reyburn, 6 Pet. 354 ; U. S. v. May, 3 Mason, 98. 

merchant. Perkins v. State, 50 Ala. 154. 

in . In statute, Greer v, U. S., 3 Ct. of CI. 182. 

special . In statute. Re Presentment, i Jebb. 98. 

OOIOQSSIONEB. Dean v, Emerson, 102 Mass. 484. 

COMMIT. suicide. In insurance policy. Cooper z/. Massachusetts Ins. Co.. 

102 Mass 227 ; Clift v, Schwabe, 3 C. B. 477. 

In statute. Ex parte Paris, 3 Woodb. & M. 227 ; Cummington v. 
Wareham, 9 Cush. 585. 

for trial to the assizes. In statute. Queen v. Johnson, 10 Ad. 



OOMMITMENT. 



COMMTFTEI). 



OOMMll'rLNG. 



OOMMODITY. 



COMMON. 



& Ell. 740. 

any i>erson to jaiL In statute, Thomas v, St. Louis, 61 Mo. 

547. 

GOMMODlTUsS. In constitiition. Com. v, Lancaster Bank, 123 Mass. 493. 

In statute. Best v, Bauder, 29 How. Pr. 489; Provident Inst, v, Massa- 
chusetts, 6 Wall. 611; Portland Bank v, Apthorp, 12 Mass. 252: 
Com. V, Peoples' Bank, 5 Allen, 431 ; Com. v, Hamilton Manufac- 
turing Co., 12 Allen, 300. 

In statute. State v, Henke, 19 Mo. 225 ; Barnet v, Powell, Litt. SeL 
Cas. 409. 

McDuffee v. Railroad, 52 N. H. 430. 

In plat. White v. Smith, 37 Mich. 291. 

barrator. Com. v, Davis, 1 1 Pick. 438. 

drunkard. In statute. Com. v, McNamee, 112 Mass. 285 ; Com. 

V, Boon, 2 Gray, 74; Com. v, Whitney, 5 Gray, 85. 

field. Glasgow v, Hortig, i Black, 595. 

gaming table. In statute, U. S. v. Smith, 4 Cranch C. C. 635, 659. 

gambler. People v, Sponsler, i Dakota, 293. 

labor. In statute. State v. Conger, 14 Ind. 396 ; Reynolds v. 

Stevenson, 9 Ind. 112 ; Voglesongz^. State, 9 Ind. 112 ; Folz v. State. 
33 Ind. 215; Cincinnati v. Rice, 15 Ohio, 225 ; Horack v, Keebier, 5 
Neb. 355. 

law. In constitution, U. S. v, Wonson, i Gall. 20 ; Parsons r/. 



Bedford, 3 Pet. 433 ; Fenn v. Holme, 21 How. 481. 



COMMON. 71 COMPENSATION. 

COMMON ~ Continued. 

law juriBdiotion. In statute. Ex parte Gladhill, 8 Mete. 168; 

Ex parte Gregg, 1 Curtis, 98 ; State v, Whittemore, 50 N. H. 245 ; 
re Connor, 39 Cal. 98 ; U. S. v. Power, 14 Blatchf. 223. 

or waste lAndB. In statute. Grand Union Canal Co. v, Ashley, 6 

Hurl. & N. 395. 

flOhoolB. In statute. Roach v. Board of Public Schools, 7 Mo. 



(App.) 567 ; Jenkins v. Andover, 103 Mass. 99 ; Merrick v. Inhabitants, 
12 Allen, 500; People v. Board of Education, 13 Barb. 400. 

seller. Com. v. Tubbs, i Cush. 2 ; State v, O'Connor, 49 Me. 

594. 

thief. In statute. World v. State, 50 Md. 49 ; Com. v. Hope, 22 

• Pick. I ; Stevens v. Com., 4 Mete. 399 ; Haggett v. Com., 3 Mete. 457. 

— tools. In statute. Lenoir v. Weeks. 20 Ga. 596. 

suit of any i>ers(m. In statute. Meller v. Palfreyman, 4 B. & 

Ad. 140. 

COMMONS. In statute. Patterson v. Reynolds, 61 Mo. 205. 

OOMMTTNIOANT. Queen v. Hall, 7 B. & S. 642. 

COMM u JM lOATED. In statute. Perley v. Eastern R. Co., 98 Mass. 418 ; Hart v. 

Western R. Co., 13 Mete. 99; Safford v. Boston, ete.^ R. Co., 103 

Mass. 584. 
OOMMUNICATIONS. Amherst Bk. v. Conkey, 4 Mete. 462. 

COMMUNITY. Clark v. Norwood, 12 La. Ann. 598. 

oonfLdenoe of the • In contract. Gil man v. Dwight, 13 Gray. 

359. 

COMMUTE, pardon such liinatio or the execution. In statute. Re Victor. 

3 1 Ohio St. 206. 

COMMUTED. In statute. Trimmer v. Walsh, 3 B. & S. 37. 

COMPACT. In constitution. Green v, Biddle, 8 Wheat, i ; Canal Co. v. R. Co., 4 

Gill & J. I ; Holmes v. Jennison, 14 Pet. 572. 

In statute. Re St. James' Club, 16 Jur. 1075. 

Ryder v. Wilcox, 103 Mass. 29 ; Palmer v. Peckham, 33 Me. 32. 

lu contract. Hallett v. Dowdell, 18 Q. B. 90. 

In statute. Queen v. Whitmarsh, 14 Q. B. 804. 

or association. In statute. Austin v. Searing, 16 N. Y. 112. 

any public . In statute. Nicholls v. Rosewame, 6 C. B. (N. S.) 

480. 

joint-stock . In statute. Att'y-Gen. v. Mercantile Ins. Co.. 121 

Mass. 524; Abbot v. Rogers, 16 C. B. 292. 

owned by said . In statute. Keyport Co. v. Farmers' Co., 3 C. 

E. Green, 13 ; 3 C. E. Green, 511. 

the . In contract. Squire v. Western Union R. Co., 98 Mass. 

232. 

COMPELLED. In statute. Burbank v. Slinkard, 53 Ind. 493. 

COMPENSATION. Searcy v. Grow, 15 Cal. 117; Stewart v. Harper, 16 La. Ann. 

181 , Austin V. Wilson, 4 Cush. 274. 
In constitution. Board of Supervisors v. Hackett, 21 Wis. 613; Jubb 
zf. Hull Dock Co., 9 Q. B. 443 ; Searcy v. Grow, 1 5 Cal. 117; Kilgore 
V. People, 76 111. 548; Symonds v. Cincmnati, 14 Ohio, 175. 

In statute. New Jersey R. Co. v. Suydam, 17 N. J. (L.) 25; Van 



I 



COMPENSAT10I^\ 72 CONCEAL 

OOMPSNS A nON ~ Continued. 

Schack V, Delaware, etc.. Canal Co., 20 N. J. (L.) 249 ; Betts v. 
City of Williamsbuig, 15 Barb. 255. 

Joflt . In catistitutum. Alabama, etc., R. Co. v. Benkert, 42 Ala. 

83 ; Brown v. Beatty, 34 Miss. 227 ; Isone v, Mississippi Cent. R. 
Co., 36 Miss. 300 ; Viiginia, etc., R. Co. v. Henry, 8 Nev. 165. 

Just and zeasonable . In contract. Cully v. Hardenburg, i 

Den. 508. 

or other . In statute. State v. Holladay, 67 Mo. 64. 

OOMPTENCT. or releyanoy. In statute. Fox v, Webster. 46 Mo. 181. 

COMPETENT. In statute. Re Pacheo, 23 Cal. 476. 

authorities. In treaty, U. S. v, Clarke, 8 Pet. 436 ; Mitchell 

V, U. S. 9, Pet 711. 

jiirifldiotion. In statute. Babbitt v. Brush, 4 Ind. 355. 

persons. In agreement, Harvey v, Grabham, 5 Ad. &, Ell. 75. 

to dispose by will. In statute, Atty.-Gen. v, Hallett, 2 Hurl. 



& N. 368. 
OOMFIIiATIOH. Story v, Holcombe, 4 McLean, 306. 

OOMFIaAINT. In statute. Com. t^. Haynes, 107 Mass. 166; Campbell v, Thompson, 

16 Me. 117; Com. v. Davis, 11 Pick. 436. 

snoh . In statute, Sweetman v. Guest, L. R., 3 Q. B. 263. 

OOMPLETE. In contract, Mallan v, Radlofi; 17 C. B. (N. S.) 600. 

In statute. Bowman v. City of Boston, 5 Cush. 8. 

machinery to be ftimished in the mill. In contract. Grove v. 

Miles, 58 III. 338. 

OOMPIaETED. Newell v. People. 7 N. Y. 130; Hyannis' Bk. ?/. Moors, 120 Mass. 459; 

Fernald v, Boston, 12 Cush. 574. 

issued and negotiated. In plea, Gardner v. Walsh, 5 El. & 

Bl. 84. 

railway would be . In wager. Evans v. Fryer. 10 Ad. A 

Ell. 609. 

when the house is . In order, Russell ?/. Barry, 115 Mass. 300. 

OOMPIiETING. In statute, DeGraflf «/. St. Paul, etc., R. Co., 23 Minn. 114. 

OOMPIiETION. of the purchase. In contract. Mattock v, Kinglake, 10 Ad. 

& Ell. S6. 
COMPOSmrG. persons then such company. In statute, Rosevelt v. Brown, 

II N. Y. 148. 

OOMPOSITIOE*. Haskins v, Newcomb, 2 Johns. 405. 

In statute. King v. Crisp, i B. & Aid. 287 ; Tetley v, Tetley, i El. & 
Bl. 540. 
COMPOUND. In statute, Pennell v. Rhodes, 9 Q. B. 128. 

interest. Campz/. Bates, 11 Conn. 487. 

COMPRISED. in. In statute, Knox v. Gage, L. R., 5 H. L. 657. 

COMPBOMISE. In contract, Chilton v, Willford, 2 Wis. 6. 

In statute. Sharp v, Knox, 4 La. 456. 

CONCEAL. Gerry v. Dunham, 57 Me. 339. 

In statute, McElhaney v. State, 24 Ala. 171 ; Cook v. State. 26 Ga. 
593 ; Dnskell v. Parish, 3 McLean, 631 ; Van Meter ik Mitchell, 2 
Wall. Jr. 317 ; U. S. v, Farnsworth, i Mason, i. 



CONCEAL. 73 CONDITION. 

CDNCEAIi — Coitinucd. 

his property and efibots. In statute. Powell v, Matthews, lo Mo. 50. 

CX)NOQESAIiED. Harlow v. Tufts, 4 Cush. 448. 

In statute. People v. Miles, 55 Cal. 207 ; U. S. v. 350 Chests of Tea, 
12 Wheat. 489. 

weapons. In statute. Hutchinson v. State, 62 Ala. 3 ; Owen v. 

State, 31 Ala. 387; Jones v. State, 51 Ala. 16. 
carries about his person. In statute. Owen t/. State, 31 Ala. 

387 ; Stockdale v. State, 32 Ga. 225. 

OONCEAUNG. himselfl In statute. Harper v. Pope, 9 Mo. 402. 

(X)NCEAIilCBNT. Daniels v. Hudson River R. Co., 12 Cush. 416 ; O'Neil v. Grov«r, 

5 Gray, 159. 

0ONCEAU3. himself. In statute. North v. Macdonald, i Biss. 57 ; Boggs v. 

Burdskoff, 26 111. 66 ; Dunn v. Salter, i Duv. 342 ; Evans v, Saul, 8 
Mart. (N. S.) 247; Lynde v. Montgomery, 15 Wend. 461 ; Mayor of 
New York v. Genet, 4 Hun, 487. 

his property. In statute. Clement v. Dudley, 42 N. H. 367. 

the cause of action. In statute. Boyd v. Boyd, 27 Ind. 429 

the crime. In statute. Flee v. State, 13 Ind. 324. 

COirOKN TBATED. molasses. In revenue law. Belcher v. Linn, 24 How. 

- 508. 

COIfCaSBnr. accounts as the trade of merchandise between merchant 

and merchant. In statute. Cottam v. Partridge, 4 Man. & G. 277. 

for whom it may . In insurance policy. Wise v. St. Louis Ins. 

Co., 23 Mo. 80 ; Newson v. Douglass, 7 H. & J. 417 (16 Am. Dec. 317). 

on account of whom it may . In insurakte policy. Walsh v. 

Washington Ins. Co., 32 N. Y. 427. 

In statute. Hooper v. Robinson, 8 Otto, 529. 

COirCEBiraD. him to prosecute. In statute. Reg. v. Blank, 15 Q. B. 1061. 

in the loss. In insurance policy. McRossie v. Provincial Ins. 

Co., 34 U. C. (Q. B.) 55. 

CONCEECNS. for whom it . In insurance policy. Buck v. Chesapeake Ins. Co., 

I Pet. 151. 

OONCESSL Frost v. Raymond/2 Caines, 188. 

OONdiUDE. In constitution. State v. Waters, i Mo. (App.) 7. 

OONdiUSIOir. Ortwein v. Com., 76 Pa. St. 414. 

OONCI«I7SIVE. In statute. Burrough v. Mickle, Pen. 193. 

final and . In agreement. Mussina v. Hertzog, 5 Binney, 387 ; 

Gal breath v. Colt, 4 Yeates, 551. 

In statute. Clarke v. Patterson, 6 Binney, 128. 

CONCMBTSAOtE. open . In statute. Leader v. Tell, 16 C. B. (N. S.) 590. 

OONCUBKBNGE In constitution. Baulden v. Lockhart, 59 Tenn. 262. 

CON'CITBSO. Schroeders v. Nicholson. 2 La. 350. 

OONBXSMNATION. money. In bond. Doe z«. Daniels, 6 Blackf. 8. 

OOxiUXTiOK* Laberee v. Carleton, 53 Me. 211 ; Taylor v. Mason, 9 Wheat. 325. 

In contract. Meanor v. McKowan, 4 W. & S. 302 ; Hayne v. Cum- 
mins, 16 C. B. (N. S.) 421 

In deed. Sohier v. Trinity Churcl), 109 Mass. i. 

In instruction. Buesching v. St. Louis Gas Co., 73 Mo. 220. 

In will. Attorney-General v. Master Wardens, L. R., 6 H. L. i. 
10 



CONDITION. 74 CONGREGATION, 

GONDrnOK ~ Continued. 

for the beneilt of the srantor. In statute. Doe v. Hawkins, 2 

Q. a 212. 

on that his oontraots be complied with. In acceptance, U. S. 

V, Bank of Memphis, 15 Pet. 377. 

same as when e3q;>ortecL In statute. Knight v, Schell, 24 How. 

56. 

upon ezprefls . In will Wright v. Wilkin, 2 B. & S. 253. 

CONDinOirAlB. liability. In statute, Reitz v. People, 72 III. 435. 

limitation. Proprietors v. Grant, 3 Gray, 143 ; Stearns v, God- 
frey, 16 Me. 158. 

CONDITIONS. In statute. Peek v.^R. Co., 10 H. L. Cas. 473J re Coleman, 15 

Blatchf. 417. 

I>erfbTmed. In plea. Hammettv. Bullett, i Call, (Va.) 567. 

OONDONATIOK. Armstrong z^. Armstrong, 32 Miss. 2S0; Odom v, Odom, 36 Ga. 

286 ; Betz V. Betz, 2 Robt. 694 ; Phillips v. Phillips, 27 Wis. 252. 

OONDUCfr. cattle. In statute, Triggs v. Lester, L. R., i Q. B. 260. 

OONDUCTED. as has been heretofore In deed, Harvey v. Vandergrift, 89 

Pa. St. 346. 

CONDUCTING. actions or suits. In statute. Reg. v. Priest, 16 Q. B. 44. 

CONFECTIONEBY. In indictment. Com. v. Chase, 125 Mass. 202. 

In statute, Arthur v, Sapham, 6 Otto, 126. 
CONFESSION. People v. Strong, 30 Cal. 151. 

CONFIDED. female shall have been • In statute. State v, Arnold, 55 Mo. 89. 

CONFIDENCE. ' game. In statute. Pierce v. People, 81 111. 141. 

man. Fausett v. Clark, 48 Md. 494. 

ftdl . In will, Coates' Appeal, 2 Pa. St. 133; Pen nock Estate, 

20 Pa. St. 268. 

CONFTDENTIAIi. In Utter. Insigi v. Brown, 17 How. 183. 

CONFINE. In statute, U. S. v. Sharp, Pet. C. C. 118. 

the master. In statute, 4 Mason, 105. U. S. v. Savage, 5 

Mason, 461 . 

the person of any female. In statute. Blight v. Meeker, 7 N. 



J. (L.) 97. 

CONFINED. In statute. Queen v. Inhabitants, 14 Q. B. 328. 

CONFINEMENT. In statute, U. S v. Sharp, Pet. C. C. 118; U. S. v, Thompson, i 

Sumn. 168 ; U. S. v, Lawrence, i Cranch, C. C. 94 ; U. S. v. Savage, 
5 Mason, 460. 

in . In statute. Ex parte Price, 53 Ala. 547. 

CONFIRM. In statute. Queen v. Mayor, i El. & HI. 589. 

CONFIBMATION. date of . In statute. State v. North Beigen, 39 N. J. (L.) 

456. 

CONFOBMABLY. to the laws. In Constitution, Re Nichols, 8 R. L 55. 

CONFUSION. Palmer v, Burnsfde, i Woods, 179. 

of goods. HesseltincT'. Stock well, 30 Me. 237 ; Treat v. Barber* 

7 Conn. 274. 

CONGBEGATION. In statute, Lancaster v. State* 53 Ala. 398. 

assembled. In statute. Com. v, Jennings, 3 Gratt 624. 



CONNECT. 75 CONSOLIDATE^ 

OOnjilJficrr. with. In contract. Truax v. Philadelphia, etc., R. Co., 3 Houst 

553. 
OOimSCfFED. Eakin v, St Louis, etc., R. Co., 3 Cent. L. J. 656; Kennecott v. 

Supervisors, 16 Wall. 452. 

therewith* In statute, Ogbourne v, Ogbourne, 60 Ala. 616. 

with. In statute, Scarborough v. Smith, 18 Kas. 399. 

with the dwelling-hoiise. In statute. McAllister v. McAllister, 

37 Ala. 484. 

railroads together. In statute. Burtis v, B. & St. L. R. R., 24 

N. Y. 269. 

OONlllBCfFION. In statute. Allison v. Smith, 16 Mich. 405. 

guilty . In indictment. State v. Geoige, 7 Ired. (L.) 321. 

OONNSCnONS. Storer v. Wheatley, i Pa. St. 506. 

OOmmnSD. at the same. In statute. U. S. v. Distillery, 1 1 Blatchf. 255. 

OONNTVIKG. at the adultery. In statute. Gipps v, Gipps, 11 H. L. Cas. i. 

COUBCIENGE. in statute. People v, Stewart, 7 Cal. 144. 

C01[SENT. Barneg v. Butcher, 9 C. & P. 722. 

In constitution. Bouldin v, Lockhart, 59 Tenn. 262. 

In statute. Schmidt v. Mitchell, 84 III. 195; Phelps v. Town of Lew- 
iston, 15 Blatchf. 133. 

in writing of the author. In statute. Morton v. Copeland, 16 

C. B. 535. 

of the people expressed at the ballot-box. In constitution. 

State V, Little Rock, etc., R. Co., 31 Ark. 701. 

or agreement. In statute. Bewley t^. Atkinson, 13 Ch. Div. 

283. 

approve and . In will. Waldron v. Chasteney, 2 Blatchf. 62. 

without her . Com. v, Burke, 105 Mass. 380. 

CON8SNTABLE. ^line. Brown v. Caldwell, 10 S. & R. 114. 

OOirSEQUENCE. in of theintoxicatioa In statute. Krach z^. Heilman, 53 

Ind. 517. 

OOKSEQUEfJTlAIi. damage. Eaton v. R. Co., 51 N. H. 504. 

OONSIDEB. most advantageous. State v. Miller, i Mo. (App.) 50. 

CONSIDEBATIOir. Thomas v. Thomas, 2 O. B. 851 ; Currie v. Mira, L. R., 10 Ex. 162. 

In statute, Martin v. O'Bannan, 35 Ark. 62; Connor t/. Abbott, 35 
Ark. 365. 

in . Dally v. Poolly, 6 Q. R 495. 

valuable paid. In statute. Doe v. Howells, 2 B. & Ad. 744. 

CONSIDEBED. as admitted. Queen v. Sandwich, 2 Q. B. 9cx>. 

COirSIGir. Hardy v. Munroe, 127 Mass. 64. 

OOHSIOin&D. Rolker v. Great Western Ins. Co., 4 Abb. App. Dec. 76. 

In contract. Dittmarv. Norman. 118 Mass. 319. 

6 mo. In contract. George v, Joy, 19 N. H. 544. 

OONSiaiTSB. Lyon v. Alvord, 18 Conn. 80. 

or indoraee fbr valuable oonsideration. In statute, Meyer v. 

Dresser, 16 C. B. (N. S.) 646. 

€X>NSISTIHO. of; In wiU. Faust v. Cook. 6 Mo. (App.) 331. 

OOiE^SOLIDATB. Independent Dist. v, Durland, 45 Iowa. 53. 



CONSOLIDATION. 76 CONTENTS. 

OOIXSOUDATION, Buford v, Keokuk N. L. Packet- Co., 3 Mo. (App.) 159. 

€X>liBOHANT. Kinnersley v. Knott, 7 C. B. 985. 

OONSFIBAC7. SUte v. Younger, i Dev. (Law) 357 (17 Am. Dec. 571) ; Mclntyre 

V. Mancius, 16 Johns. 592 ; U. S. v. Sacia, 2 Fed. Rep. 754 ; U. S. 
V, Nunnemacher, 7 Biss. iii. 

In siiUuie. De Boinville v, Arnold, i C. B. (N. S.) 22. 



CONSTANT. use. Bodfish v. Bodfish, 105 Mass. 319. 

CONSTANTLY. worked. In insurance policy. Prieger v. Exchange, etc, Ins. 

Co., 6 Wis. 91. 

OONSTmiENTS. In deed. Vilas v. Reynolds, 6 Wis. 226. ' 

OONSTBIJCT. to . In statute. Re Fowler, 53 N. Y. 60. 

OONBTBUCrrED. Troy Co. v. Odiorne, 17 How. 72. 

In statute. North Eastern R. Co. v. Local Bd., L. R, 5 Q. B. 157. 

hereafter . In statute. Attorney-General v. Ware River R. Co.' 

1 1 5 Mass. 400. 

OONBTBUCTION. In statute. Queen v. Carruthers, 4 B. & S. 817. 

and repair of veflsela. In statute. The Ferax, Sprague^iSo ; 

Donnell v. The Starlight, 103 Mass. 227. 

erection or repair of any building. In mechanic's lien law. 

Rose V, Persse, etc.. Paper Works, 29 Conn. 256. 

of the railway. In statute. Brand z^. R. Co., 7 B. & S. 43. 

or repair of any building. In statute. Knaube v. Kirchner, 39 

Ind. 217. 

or repairs. In statute. Clinton v. Foster, 103 Mass. 233* 



OONBTBUCfnVE. total loss. Globe Ins. Co. v. Sherlock, 25 Ohio St 5a 

OONHULl Re Anne, 3 Wheat. 435. 

CONSUMED. In indictment. Com. v. Tucker, 1 10 Mass. 403. 

CONSUMMATION, final . In statute. Re King, 3 Fed. Rep. 839. 

CONTAINED. in a frame bam. In policy of insurance. McCIuer v. Girard 

F. & M. Ins. Co., 43 la. 349. 

in engine-house No. 2. In policy of insurance. Annapolis, etc., 

R. Co. V. Baltimore Fire Ins. Co., 32 Md. 37 (3 Am. Rep. 112). 

CONTAININO. In contract. Beckh v. Page, 5 C. R (N. S.) 7. 

In deed, Powell v. Lyles, i Murph. 348. 

by estimation. In deed. Tarbell v. Bowman, 103 Mass. 342. 

CONTEMPLATED. passage way. In deed. Tufts v. Charleston, 2 Gray, 273. 

CONTEMPLATION, in of bankruptcy. In statute. Re Johann, 2 Biss. 1 39 ; 

Morgan!/. Bundsett, 5 B. & Ad. 296; Buckingham v. McLean, 13 
How. 150; Rison z^. Knapp, i Dill. 186; Martin v. Toof, i Dill. 203; 
Heroy v. Kerr, 8 Bosw. 194 ; Everett z^. Stone, 3 Story, 446 ; Arnold 
V. Maynard, 2 Story, 349; Atkinson z/. Farmers* Bank, Crabbe, 529; 
Ashby V. Steere. 2 Woodb. & M. 347 ; Jones v. Howland, 8 Mete. 
377; re Crafts, 6 Blatchf. 177. 

CONTEMPT. Ex parte Cohen, 5 Cal. 494; Lyon v. Lyon, 21 Conn. 199. 

oonstruotive . Androscoggin R. Co. v. Androscoggin, 49 Me. 

392. 
criminal . In statute. Robbins v. Gorham, 25 N. Y. 588 ; An- 
droscoggin, etc., R. Co. V. Androscoggin, 49 Me. 392. 

CONTENTS. of any promissory note or other ohose in action. In statute. 

Barney v. Globe Bank, 5 Blatchf. 107. 



CONTENTS. 



77 



CONTRACT. 



OOHTENTS — Continued. 

unknown. In biU of laditig. Clark v, Barnwell, 12 How. 272. 

' — were made known and explained. £n statute, Bohan v. 
Casey* 5 Mo. (App.) 106. 

CONTESTED. eleotion. In statute, Steele v. Wear, 54 Mo. 531. 

COHnaXJOUB. chapman v. Cook, 10 R. I. 304. 

In insurance policy, Arkell v. Commerce Ins. Co., 69 N. Y. 191. 

property.- In constitution. Guild v, Chicago, 82 111. 472. 

COlTTDraENCfr. in statute. Boyd v, Robins, 4 C. B. (N. S.), 750; Hopkins tf. 

Thomas, 7 C. B. (N. S.), 716. 

any . In statute, Adams i/. Bigelow, 128 Mass. 365. 

due abflolntely and not on any . In statute. Ware v. Gowan, 

65 Me. 534 ; Dwinel v. Stone, 30 Me. 384. 

liability to pay money upon a . In statute. Parker v. Ince, 

4 Hurl. & N. 54. 



COIMTLNQSNT. 



claim. In statute. Sears v. Willis, 7 Allen, 430. 

— debts. In statute. Zimmer v. Scbleehauf, 1 1 5 Mass. 52. 

— demand. In statute, Maguire v. Rippen, 44 Mo. 512; French 
V, Morse, 2 Gray, 1 1 1. 

— estate. Jennison v. Blowers, 5 Barb. 686 ; Sheridan v. House, 
4 Abb. App. Dec. 218. 

— ezpenaea. In will, Attorney-General v. Union Soc., 1 16 Mass. 
167. 

— liability. Boutel v, Owens, 2 Sandf. 655 ; re Loder, 4 Ben. 305, 



O OJW'l'mUJK 



328. 
Belknap v, Belknap, 2 Johns. Ch. 463 (7 Am. Dec. 548). 

a atookholder. In contract. Bacon v, Pomeroy, 104 Mass. 577. 

in charge. In statute, Chaney v. Paine, i Q. B. 713. 

in ofELoe. In bond. Mutual Loan, etc., Co. v. Price, 16 Fla. 204. 

in said oflLoe* In statute. Mayor v. Oswald, 3 Ell. & Bl. 670. 

80 ii^oorporated. In statute, Reg. v. Register, 10 Q. B. 839. 

tooooupy. In statute. Walters v. People. 18 111. 199; 21 111. 



178. 



O OJiTlNUmO . 



to praotioe. In statute, Wilton v. Chambers, 7 Ad. & Ell. 524. 
charge. In statute, Lilford v. Attorney-General, L. R., 2 H. 



L. Cas. 63* 

interest. In statute. LHford v, Attorney-General, L. R., 2 H. 

L. Cas. 63. 

oflbnae. In statute. Marshall v. Smith, L. R., 8 C. P. 417. 

trustee. Re East, L. R., 8 Ch. App. 735. 

COimNUOnS. adverse use. Davidson v. Nicholson, 59 Ind. 41 1. 

use. Bodfish V, Fox, 105 Mass. 319. 

one passage. In ticket. Cody v. Central Pacific R. Co, 4 Saw- 
yer, 117. 

Holtz V, Schmidt, 59 N. Y. 253; Willetts v. Sun Mut. Ins. Co., 45 N. 
Y. 45 ; Hammond v. Shepard, 40 How. Pr. 452 ; Adams v. Honess, 
62 Barb. 326 ; L'Amoroux v. Gould, 7 N. Y. 349 ; Sanders v. Gil- 
lespie, 59 N. Y. 250 ; Cope v. Atkinson, 8 Ex. 185 ; Fletcher v. Peck, 
6 Cranch, 87 ; Sturgis v. Crowninshield, 4 Wheat. 122 ; McNulty v. 



OONTRAOr. 



CONTRACT. 78 CONTRACTED 

0019TBACT — Continued. 

Prentice, 25 Barb. 204; Pelham v. State, 50 Tex. 422; Atwaterv. 
Lockwood, 39 Conn. 45 ; Belfast, etc., R. Co. v. Unity, 62 Me. 148; 
Quinby v. Vanderbilt, 17 N. Y. 306 ; Safford v, Wykoff, 4 Hill, 442; 
State V, Brown, 28 Miss. 810. 

In constitution. New Orleans, etc., R. Co. v, Harris. 27 Miss. 517; 
Micon V, Bridge Co., 47 Ala. 652 ; Alabama R. Co. v, Burkett, 46 
Ala. 569 ; Mobile Comm. v, Putnam, 44 Ala. 506. 

Jn statute, Oay v. State, 7 Kas. 394 ; De Barre v, Livingston, 48 Barb. 
511 ; U. S. z/. Learned, i Abb. U. S. 442; U. S. v. Smith, i Sawy. 
192 ; Burnes v, Simpson, 9 Kas. 658. 

oonoemlng an interest in land* In statute. Toppin v. Loomis, 

16 C. B. 140. 

for the benefit of her fbmily. In statute. National Bank v. 



Smith, 43 Conn. 330; Smith v. Williams, 43 Conn. 417. 

— Ibr the benefit of herself. In statute. Gore v. Carl, 47 Conn. 
291. 

— Ibr sale, sell and oonvey. In power of attorney. Peck v. Har- 
riott, 6 S. & R. 146 (9 Am. Dec. 415). 

— for the payment of interest. In statute. Hubbard v. Callahan, 



42 Conn. 525. 

— for the payment of money only. In statute. Grant v. Dabney, 
19 Kas. 390; Johnson v. Martin, 54 Ala. 271 ; Morrow v. Wood, 57 
Ala. I ; Masterson v. Gibson, 56 Ala. 57 ; Johnson v. Maxey, 43 
Ala. 521. 

— for the sale of goods. In statute. Allen v. Jarvis, 20 Conn. 



39; Gardner v. Joy, 9 Mete. 179 ; Garbutt v. Watson, 5 B. & Aid. 
613. 

for the sale of lands. In statute. Brackett v. Evans, i Cush. 79. 

in respect to her property. In statute. Muzzey v. Reardon^ 

57 N. H. 378. 
in writing with a person. In statute. Pooley v. Driver, 5 Ch. 

Div. 458. 
made between the plaintiff and any other person. In statute. 

Dowbeggin v. Harrison, 9 B. & C. 668. 

marriage. In statute. Frost v. Vought, 37 Mich. 65. 

obligation or liability. In city charter. McGaflin v. City of 

Cohoes, 74 N. Y. 387 (30 Am. Rep. 387). 

of manufia,oture.* Cain v. Weston, 26 Wis. 102. 

of sale. Cain v. Weston, 26 Wis. 102. 

or cause of action. In statute. Wright v. Gilbert, 51 Md. i47- 

promise or agreement. In statute. Kidson v. Turner, 3 Hurl. 

& N. 583. 

to serve. In statute. Hardy v. Ryle, 9 B. & C. 610. 

action arising on . In statute. McCoun v. H. R. R. R., $0 N. 

Y. 176. 

action founded on . In statute. Pontifex v. R. Co., 3 Q. B. 

Div. 27 ; Tatton v. R. Co., 2 El. & El. 851. 

special . In statute. Peek v. R. Co., 10 H. L. Cas. 473. 

. In statute. Vcltman v. Thompson, 3 N. Y. 439 ; Smith v. Oman, 17 
Wis. 397. 



CONTRACTOR. 79 CONVENIENT 

OONTBACrrOB. In statute. Peters v, St. L. I. M. R. R., 24 Mo. 586 ; Kent v. New 

York, etc., R. Co., 12 N. Y. 628; Warner z^. Hudson River R Co., 
5 How. Pr. 454; Mundt v, Sheboygan, etc., R. Co., 31 Wis. 451. 

OONTBACTOBS. laborers and workmen. In statute, Pennsylvania R. Co. v, 

Leuffer, 24 Pitts. L. J. 177. 

OONTBACTS. In statute. Allison v, Hubbell, 17 Ind. 559; Jones v. Hawkins, 17 Ind. 

550; Barkshire v. State, 7 Ind. 389; Foulke v. R. Co., 51 Cal. 365 , 
State V, Weatherwax, 12 Kas 463 ; Niblack v, Goodman, 67 Ind. 
178. 

In constitution. Arkansas Co. v, Kearney, 31 Ark. 264; Washington 
Bridge Co. v. State, 18 Conn. 54. 

bargai]i8,.agreement0, jiolioies and other instruments. In 

insurance charter. Ins. Co. v. Colt, 20 Wall. 560. 

in writing, /a statute. Insurance Building Co. v. National 

Bank, 5 Mo; (App.) 333. 

debts, and other engagements. In statute. Campbell v, Per- 
kins, 8 N. Y. 430. 

OOHTRABY. intention. In statute. Coote v. Lowndes, L. R., 10 Eq. Cas. 376 ; 

Lewis T'. Lewis, L. R., 13 Eq. Cas. 218. 

or other intention. In statute. Re Newmarch, 27 W. R 104. 

to law. In statute. Bosseker v. Cramer, 18 Ind. 44. 

In indictment. Hudson v. State, i Blackf. 318. 

to said statutes. In indictment. Blydenburgh v. Miles, 39< 

Conn. 484. 

OONTBIBUTE. McMurray v. McHugh, 9 Cush. 166. 

In statute. Bush v, Murray, 66 Me. 472 ; Tuflf v. Warman, 5 C. B. (N. 
S.) 585; Button v. R. Co., 18 N. Y. 248 ; Johnson v. R. Co., 20 N. Y. 74.. 

OOKTBIB U TIN G. inhabitant . In statute. Reg.z/. Kershaw, 6 El. & Bl. 1006. 

OONTBIBnTION. Campbell v. Meiser, 4 Johns. Ch. 334 ; Peck v. Ellis, 2 Johns. 

Ch. 131 ; Miller v. Fenton, 11 Paige, 18; Aspinwall t^. Sacchi, 57 
N. Y. 331 ; Stearns v. Cooper, i Johns. Ch. 425 ; Taylor v. Porter,. 
7 Mass. 3S5 ; Cheeseborough v. Millard, i Johns. Ch. 425 ; Hick- 
man t/. McCurdy, 7 J. J. Marsh. 559 ; Veile v. Hoag, 24 Vt 46 ; Way- 
land V. Tucker, 4 Gratt. 268; Couch v. Terry, 12 Ala. 225; White 
V. Banks, 21 Ala. 705 ; Russell t^. Failer, i Ohio St. 327 ; Bartle v. 
Nutt, 4 Pet. 184; Moore v. Appleton, 26 Ala. 633; Armstrong Co. 
V. Clarion Co., 66 Pa. St. 218 ; Acheson v. Miller, 2 Ohio St 203,. 

OONTBIBUTOBY. In statute. Norris v. Cattle, 2 H. L. Cas. 647 ; Hutton v. UpfelU 

2 H. L. Cas. 674 ; re Angelsea Colliery Co., L. R., 2 Eq. Cas. 379. 

OOlfTBOVEBSIES. In constitution. Sewing Machine Co.'s Case, 18 Wall. 5S3- 

of a oivil nature. In statute. State v. State, 12 Pet. 6s7« 

whioh might be the sul](ieot of a personal action at law or 

of a suit in equity. In statute. Henderson v. Adams, 5 Cush. 

612. 

OONTBOVEBSY. In statute. Sands v. Harvey, 4 Abb. App. Dec. 147 ; Board of 

Comms. V. Kansas, etc., R. Co., 4 Dill. 277 ; Craigie v. McArthur,. 
4 Dill. 474. 

litigation or . In statute. Reg. v. Commrs., 15 Q. B. 563. 

OOirVIBNIENT. In charter. Davis v. Waddington, 7 Man. & G. 40. 

In contract. Newsam v. Finch, 25 Barb. 175. 

and necessary. In statute. Abson v. Fenton, i B. & C. 203. 



CONVENIENT. 80 CONVICTED. 

CONVENIENT— Continued. 

place* St. Helen's Co. v. Tripping, ii H. L. Cas. 642. 

speed. In charter-party, Tanabochea v, Hickie, i Hurl, k N. 

185. 

ae may be moat . In statute. Attorney-General v. Railroad, 9 

C. E. Green, 49; Easton v. New York, etc., R. Co., 24 N. J. (Eq.) 

49. 
payable aa . In contract. Black v, Batchelder, 120 Mass. 171- 

OONVEBSION* Bell v. Layman, i T. B. Mon. 39 (15 Am. Dec. 83); Hale v. Ames, 2 

T. B. Mon. 143 (15 Am. Dec. 151) ; Burroughs v, Bayne, 5 Hurl. h. 
N. 300 ; Keyworth v. Hill, 3 B. & Aid. 687 ; Bowlin v. Nye, loCush. 
416; Clark T/. Whitaker, 19 Conn. 319, Murray z/. Burling, 10 Johns. 
172; Spencer t'. Blackman, 9 Wend. 167 ; Connah v. Hale, 23 Wend. 
462 ; Bristol V. Burt, 7 Johns. 254 ; Reynolds v. Shuler, 5 Cow. 323: 
Fouldes V. Willoughby, 8 M. & W. 540. 

fraadQlent , In statute. Com. v. Tenney, 97 Mass. 50. 

CONVEBTED. In plea, Lancashire Wagon Co. v. Fitzhugh, 6 Hurl. & N. 507. 

CONVEY* Spicer z/. Norton, 13 Barb. 543; Dickinson v, Abrahams, 21 Barb. 

551. 
In contract, Abendroth v. Town of Greenwich, 29 Conn. 356 ; Law- 
rence V. Dale, II Vt 549; Woodcock v, Bennett, i Cow. 711; 
Fuller V. Hubbard, 6 Cow. 13 ; re Hunter, i Edw. i. 

In deed, Patterson t^. Conneal, 3 A. K. Marsh. 618 (13 Am. Dec 

128). 

In statute, Pickett v, Buckner, 45 Miss. 226. 

and deTiae. In statute. White v. Wager, 25 N. Y. 328. 

OONVEYANOE. Odd Fellows Savings Bank v, Banton, 46 Cal. 603 ; Babcock v, 

Hoey, II Iowa, 375; Klein v, McNamara, 54 Miss. 104; Warner tr. 
Rogers, 23 Minn. 34. 

In statute, Evans v. Wilder, 7 Mo. 359 ; Bank v, Frank, 4$ N. Y. 404 ; 
Call V, Hastings, 3 Cal. 184; Wilcoxson v. Miller, 49 Cal. 193; 
White T'. Fitzgerald, 19 Wis. 480 ; Jones v, Marks, 47 Cal. 342 ; The 
Golden Gate, i Newb. (Adm.) 308 ; Mott v, Ruckman, 3 BlatchC C. 
C. 71 ; Palmer v. Bates, 22 Minn. 532 ; Livermore v, Bagley. 3 Mass. 
487 ; Foster v, Briggs, 3 Mass, 313. 

ofrealeatate.' In statute. Mayor of N. Y. v, Mabie, 13N. Y. 

151. 

of real property. In statute. Savings Bank v, Banton, 46 Cal. 

604. 

provided Ibr the transportation of paaaengera. In accident 



insurance ticket. Brown v. R'y Pass. Ins. Co., 45 Mo. 223. 
deed of founded ui>on a grant. In statute. Love v. Love, 2 

Yerg. 288. 
traveling by publio or private . In accident insurance policy. 

Ripley v, Ins. Co., 16 Wall. 336. 
CONVEYANCES. In statute. Smith v. Hutchings, 30 Mo. 380. 

CONVEYED. Mechanic's, etc., Banks' Appeal, 31 Conn. 69 ; Jones v, Davis, 22 Wis. 

424. 
/// deed, Edelman v, Yeakel, 27 Pa. St. 26. 
CONVICTED. In statute, Ritter v, I>emocratic Press Co.. 68 Mo. 459 ; Blanfiis v. 

People, 69 N. Y. 107; Faunce v. People, 51 111. 311 ; Burgess v, 

Boetefeur, 7 M. & G. 494. 



CONVICTED. 



8l 



CORPORATE^ 



OONVKfTSD — Continued. 

felon. In HbtL Leyman v. Latimer, 3 Ex. Div. 353. 

every person of felony. In statute. Queen v. Vine, L. R., 10 



OOHVIOTION. 



ooisrvoY. 



COPIED, 



COPYHOLD. 



COBB. 



COBir. 



Q. B. 200. 

Mason v. Staples, 48 Me. 133; Shepherd v. People, 24 How. Pr. 38; 
Com. V, Lockwood, 109 Mass. 323 ; State v, Alexander, 76 N. C. 
231. 

In offer of reward. Williams z/. U. S., 12 Ct. of CI. 192. 

In constitution, U. S. v, Watkinds, 6 Fed. Rep. 152. 

In statute, Messner v. People, 45 N. Y. i ; Com. v. Gorham, 99 Mass. 
420 ; State v. Foreman, 3 Mo. 602 ; Com. v. Lockwood, 109 Mass. 
324; Canfieldz/. Mitchell, 43 Conn. 172. 

after In constitution. State v. Nichols, 26 Ark. 74 (7 Am. Rep. 

600) ; State v, Alexander, 76 N. C. 231 (22 Am. Rep. 675). 

In insurance poUcy, Christian v, Ditchell, Peake Add. Cas. 143, note. 

U. S. V, Thompson, i Sumn. 169. 

oaah. In statute, Crocker v. Redfield, 4 Blatchf. 378. 

when old and lit only to be remami feotured. In statute, 

Crocker v, Redfield, 4 Blatcht 378. 

ship. In marine policy. Hazard v, N. E. Ins. Co, 8 Pet. 557 ; 1 

Sumn. 218. 

for return. In survey. Wilson v, Stoner, 9 S. & R. 39 (i i Am. 



Dec. 664). 

Calling V. Treweek, 6 B. & C. 395 ; Millard v, Taylor, 4 Burr. 2396. 

In statute. Olcott v, Bynum, 17 Wall. 44; Stowe v. Thames, 2 Wall. 
Jr. 547; Rogers v, Jewett, 12 Month. Law Rep. (N. S.) 369; West 
V, Francis, 5 B. & Aid. 743 ; Cook v. Vaughan, 4 M. & W. 69 ; Ros- 
siter V. Hall, 5 Blatchf. 363. 

any print. In statute, Grambert v. Ball, 14 C. B. (N. S.) 320. 

of any print. In statute. West v, Francis, 5 B. & Aid. 739. 

a of its articles of association. In statute. West Winstead Sav- 
ing Association v. Ford, 27 Conn. 282. 

other . In will, Vick v, Sueter. 3 Ell. & Bl. 233. 

Baker v, Selden, 11 Otto, 99. 

In contract. Sims t^. Marryatt, 17 Q. B. 289. 

Kennedy v, Oswego, etc., R. Co., 67 Barb. 169. 

of wood* In statute. Pray v, Burbank, 12 N. H. 267. 

In plea, Colton v. King, 2 Allen, 317. 

In insurance policy. Mason v. ^Ikurray, Park, on Ins. 245 ; Moody v. 
Surridge, Park, on Ins. 245 ; Scott v, Bourdillion, 2 Bos. & Pul. (N. 
R.) 214. 

In statute, Sullins v. State, 53 Ala. 474; Com. v. Pine, 2 Pa. L. J. 

«54. 
Sampson v, Shaw, loi Mass. 145. 

In statute. Re Cavan Presentment, i Jebb. 213. 

imbeoility* In plea. Ferris v. Ferris, 8 Conn. 166. 

oath. Jackson v. State, i Ind. 184. 

anthorities. In constitution. Hessley v, Commrs., 53 111. 105. 

I — biiildings. In statute, R^. v. Connel, 8 Q. B. 928. 



II 



CORPORATE. 



82 



CORRUPT U' 



OOBPOBATION 



COBPOBATE — Continued. 

ezistenoe* In statute. Hurt v, Salisbury, 55 Mo. 310. 

property* In statute, Wentham v, Norfolk, 114 Mass. 555. 

purposes. In constitution. People v. Trustees of Schools, 78 

IlL 137; Livingston Co. v. Welder, 64 111. 427; McCullie v. Mayor 
of Chattanooga, 3 Head, 317; Chicago, etc., R. Co. t/. Smith, 62 
111. 268 ; Taylor v, Thompson, 42 111. 9. 

Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward, 4 Wheat. 636 ; Provi- 
dence Bank v. Billings, 4 Pet. 562 ; Paschall v, Whitsett. 1 1 Ala. 
472 ; Sutton's Hospital Case, 10 Coke, 32 ; Smith v. Myers, 1 5 Gal. 
33 ; Price v, Sacramento Co., 6 Cal. 254 ; Weary v. State University, 
42 la. 335 ; Chisholm's Exr. v, (^eorgia, 2 Dallas, 419. 

In statute, Wallace v. Lawyer, 54 Ind. 501 ; Browser v. New England 
Ins. Co., 21 Wis. 560; Middough v, St. J. & D. R. R., 51 Mo. 520; 
Creorgia v. Atkins, i Abb. U. S. 22 ; Farnsworth z^. F. H. A. R. R.* 
29 Mo. 75 , Trustees, etc., v. Jordan, 33 Me. 528; State v, Atkins, 
35 Ga. 315 Queen v, Whitmarsh, 14 Q. B. 804; Hixon v, Geoige, 
18 Kas. 253; Hixon v, George, 18 Kas. 255 , Memphis v. Laski, 9 
Heisk. 511 ; Linehan v, Cambridge, 109 Mass. 213. 

aggregate* Brunswick v. Dunning, 7 Mass. 447 ; Weston z/. 

Hunt, 2 Mass. 501 , DartmcAith College v. Woodward, 4 Wheat 
518; Thomas v, Dakin, 22 Wend. 9; People v. Assessors, i Hill. 
616. 

of another state. In statute. Smith v, Pac. R. R., 61 Mo. 17- 

sole. Brunswick v. Dunning, 7 Mass. 447 ; Weston v. Hunt, 2 



Mass. 501 ; Bank of Havana v, Wickham, 7 Abb. Pr. 134; Cleaves 
V. Parfit, 7 C. B. (N. S.) 838. 
any person or . In statute, Wallace v. Lawyer, 54 Ind. 501. 

foreign . In statute. Oliver v. Liverpool, etc., Ins. Co., 100 

Mass. 531 ; 10 Wall 566. 

moneyed . In statute, Mut. Ins. Co. v. Supervisors, 4 N. Y. 

442. 

moneyed business or oommeroial . In statute. Winter v. 

Iowa R. R., 2 Dill. 487. 

private . Dartmouth College v. Woodward, 4 Wheat. 518; 

Rundle?/. Delaware, etc., Canal, i Wall. Jr. 275 ; Logwood?/. Hunts- 
ville Bk., Minor, 23; Cleveland v, Stewart, 3Ga. 283. 

publio . Tinsman v, Belvidere, etc., R. Co., 26 N. J. (L.) 148; 

Ten Eyck v, Delaware, etc., R. Co., 18 N. J. (L.) 200. 

Adams v, Macfarlane, 65 Me. 143. 

'In insurance policy. Fowkes v, Ins. Co., 3 B. & S. 925. 

description. In statute,^ Jordon v. South Fork Canal Co., i 

McAllister, 513. 

OOBBOBOBATED. by other evidence. In statute, Evans v, Evans, 41 Cal. 

108. 

COBBOBOBATING. ~ 



OOBBECT. 



CORBUPT. 



circumstances. State v. Guild, 5 Halst. 163 (18 Am. 

Dec. 404). 

In statute, Henslow v. Fausett, 3 Ad. & Ell. 55. 

bargain. In statute. Re Kingston Election, 30 U. C. C. P. 388. 



OORBUFTING. In statute, Harding v, Stokes, 2 M. & W. 233. 
COBBUPTLY. In statute. Cooper v, Slade, 8 El. & BI. 1 160. 



COST. 



83 



COUNTRIES. 



CX)ST. 



COSTS. 



Goodwin v. United States, 2 Wash. 493 ; Grey v. Harper, i Story, 

574. 

prioe. In contract , Bush v. Bush, 18 N. Y. 337 ; Herst v. Cor- 

neau» i Sweeney, 590. 

McDonald v. Page, Wright, 121 ; Wallace v, Coates, i Ashmead, no; 
Apperson v. Mut Ben. Ins. Co., 38 N. J. (L.) 333 ; Tillman v. Wood, 
58 Ala. 578. 

In judgment. Chase v. De Wolf. 69 111. 47. 

In order . King v. Moate, 3 R & Adol. 238. 

ohargeB and expensoB. Scott v. Taylor, 14 Barb. 202. 

in the oauM. Pugh v. Kerr, 6 M. & W. 20. 

of suit. Kitchen v. Woodin, i Hugh. 340. 

of the oatUM* In order, Rigby v. Okell, 7 B. & C. 57. 

shall be paid by the State. In statute. State v. Brigham, 63 

Mo. 258. 

that have aoomed. In contract, Tallahassee Co. v, Glenn, 50 



OOTTAQS. 

CX)TTAaE8. 

COTTON. 



ODUJICIIa. 



Ala. 489. 

ftill and expenses. In statute, Hyde v. Mayor of Manchester, 

12 C. B. 475. 

Rex V, Prattle, i Strange, 405. 

two . In will. Doe v. Hubbard, 15 Q. B. 247. 

State V. Borroum, 23 Miss. 478. 

and woolen waste. In insurance policy. Elliott v. Hamilton 

Ins. Co., 13 Gray, 139. 

braids. In statute, Arthur v. Btephani, 6 Otto, 125. 

laces. In statute. Steedman v. Maxwell, 3 Blatchf. 366. 

mannfbotuies of. In statute, Arthur v, Herman, 6 Otto, 141 ; 

Arthur z/. Rhems, 6 Otto, 143; Kohlsaat v. Murphy, 6 Otto, 153; 
Fish V, Arthur, 13 Otto, 431. 

the :to be taken firom the quay. In statute, Neill v. Whit- 
worth, 18 C. B. (N. S.) 443. 

In statute. Queen v. Roberts, 7 Ad. & Ell. 433, 441. 
OOUMCILI1OB8. In statute. Queen v, Roberts, 7 Ad. & Ell. 433, 441. 

OOXJI^SSL. aid, abet or prooitre. In statute, Howells v, Wynne, 15 C. B. 

(N. S.) II. 

COUirrBE-CJIiAm. white v. Reagan, 32 Ark. 281. 

In statute. Pellas v, Ins. Co., 5 C. P. Div. 35; Macdougall v. 
Maguire, 35 Cal. 274; Hay v. Short, 49 Mo. 139; Vassear v, Living- 
ston, 13 N. Y. 248; Silliman v, Eddy, 8 How. Pr. 122; Gage v, 
Angell, 8 How. Pr. 335; Davidson v. Livingston, 12 How. Pr. 10; 
Conner v, Winton, 7 Ind. 523 ; Dietrich v, Koch, 35 Wis. 618. 

OOUITPBKPBIT. coin. Queen v. Hermann, L. R, 4 Q. B. Div. 284. 

OOUKTBBPABT. Doe v. Smith, 8 Ad. & Ell. 265. 

COiriQTrEBSIGNED. bank bill by the cashier. In statute. Cain v. Boy nton, 

10 Mass. 34. 

CX)nNTEBS. Eagle v. Beard, 33 Ark. 497. 

CO U N TIWG-HOUSB. Reg. v. Potter, 2 Den. C. C. 235. 

GOnirrBIES. beyond the Cape of Gk>od Hope. In statute, Campbell v. 

Barney, 5 Blatchf. 221. 



COUNTRY. 



84 



COURT 



COUWTBY. 



oouirrY. 



COUFIiBD. 
COUPON, 

OOUBSS. 
COUBT. 



In statute. Stairs v, Peaslee, 18 How. 521 ; United States v. The 
Recorder, i Blatchf. 218. 

store. Elliott v. Hamilton Ins. Co., 13 Gray, 139. 

Patterson v. Temple, 27 Ark. 207 ; Commr's v, Comm'rs, 50 Md. 245. 

In constitution. State v. Finn» 4 Mo. (App.) 347 ; State v, Walton, 69 
Mo. 556. 

In statute. Queen v. Peace, 5 Q. B. Div. 3S7 ; R^. v. R. Co., 3 Q. R 
333; County Court v, Griswold, 58 Mo. 175. 

authorities. In statute. Glenn v. Comm'rs, 6 Rich. (S. C.) 412- 

board. In constttutton. Broadwellt/. People, 76 111. 554 ; Hughes 

V. People, 82 111. 78. 

bridge. In statute. Queen v. Chart, L. R., i C. C. R. 237; 

Taylor v. Davis Co., 40 Iowa, 295. 

oourt. In statute. Palmer v. Craddock, i Sneed, 215 ; County 



of St Clair v. Irwin, 15 III. 54; Bowling Green R. Co. v. Warren 
Co. Ct, 10 Bush, 711. 

offloers. In constitution. Sheboygan Co. v. Parker, 3 Wall. 93 ; 

State V. Glenn, 7 Heisk. 472. 

purposes. In statute. McCormick v. Fitch, 14 Minn. 252; 

Louisville, etc., R. Co. v. County Ct, i Sneed, 637 ; State v. 
Seaman, 23 Ohio St. 389. 

any . In statute. O'Brien v. Vulcan Iron Works, 7 Ma (App.) 

259. 

any oity or town. In constitution. Jordan v. Cass Co., 3 Dill. 

184 ; Harshman v. Baker Co., 2 Otto, 569. 

oourt of the . Palmer t^. Craddock, i Sneed, 214. 

with an interest. Hunt v. Rousmanier, 8 Wheat. 174. 



Myers v. York, etc., R. Co., 43 Me. 232; McKenzie v. Montreal, etc., 
Ins. Co., 27 U. C, C. P. 224. 

of entail. Sackville v. Holmesdale, L. R., 4 H. L. 543. 

Hendrick v. Hendrick, 28 Ind. 291 ; Tutt v. People, 36 N. Y. 431 ; 
Johnson v. Lewis, i Rich. 390; Mealing t^. Pace, 14 Ga. 596; Hobart 
V. Hobart, 45 Iowa, 501 ; Gurnee v. Co. of Brunswick, 1 Hugh. 270. 

In constitution. People v. Van Allen, 55 N. Y. 31 ; Malone v. Murphy, 
2 Kas. 45a 

In rule. Dyckmant/. McDonald, 5 How. Pr. 121 ; Osborne v, Betts, 
8 How. Pr. 31. 

In statute. Michigan, etc., R. Co. v. R. Co., 3 Ind. 239; Gold v. Ver- 
mont, etc.. R. Co.. 19 Vt. 475. 

before whom the action is tried. In statute. Cooley v. East- 
man, 57 N. H. 503. 

having a seal. Ingoldsby v. Juan, 12 Cal. 564. 

of chancery* In bond. Morgan v. Morgan, 4 Gill & J. 395- 



In statute. Stockton R. Co. v. Brown, 9 H. L. Cas. 246. 

of dvil judicature. In statute. Shrewsbury Peerage, 7 H. L 

Cas. I. 

of record. Searcy v. Hogan, Hempst. 20; Planters, etc.. Bank 



V. Chipley, Ga. Dec 50; Smith v. Morrison, 22 Pick. 430; Wheaton 
V. Fellows, 23 Wend. 375; Silver Lake Bank v. Hardmg, 5 Ohio, 
545 ; Adams v. Rogers, Wright, 428 ; Hooker v. State, 7 Blackf. 



CO UR T. 8S CRAFT. 

% , ^ , 

OOUBT — Continued. 

272; Stone V, Proctor, 2 D. Chip. (Vt.) 113; Wahrenbcrger v. 
Horan, i8Tez. 57 ; ex parte Thistleton, 52 Cal. 220; Hahn v. Keely, 
34 Cal. 391. 

of record. In statute. Bennegan v. Murphy. 13 Mete. 251 ; ex 

parte Gledhill, 8 Mete. 168 ; State z/. Whittemore, 50 N. H. 251. 

of record having "* * oommon-law juriadiotioii In statute. 

United States v. Power, 14 Blatchf. 223. 

or judge. In statute. Wilson v. Hood, 3 H. & C. 148, Oaks v. 



Rodgers, 48 Cal. 197. 

inferior • In constitution. Nugent v. State, 18 Ala. 521. 

superior . Simons v. DeBare, 4 Bosw. 547. 

In statute. Hewitt v. Cory, L. R., 5 Q. B. 418; ex parte Fernandez, 
10 C. B. (N. S.) 4. 

superior of oommon law. In statute. Jarrard v. Tuck, 8 C. 

B. 268. 

the . In statute. Greenwood v. Bradford, 128 Mass. 296. 

OOUBT-HOnSS. InstatuU, Kane v. MeCown, 55 Mo. 181 ; Hambright v. Brock- 
man, 59 Mo. 52. 

at the north door of the . In notice of sale. Alden v. Goldie, 

82 III. 581 ; Wallace v. Arnold, 71 111. 350. 

OOUBTS. In constitution. Dickson v. State, i Wis. 124. 

In statute. Tarrant v. Baker, 14 C. B. 199. 

of the United States. In constitution. Noerr v. Brewer, i 

Me Arthur, 507 ; Beatty v. Ross, 1 Fla. 198; United States v. Has- 
kins, 3 Sawy. 262 ; Jeckerz/. Montgomery, 13 How. 498; reOster- 
haus, 6 Am. L. J. 519; Clinton v. Englebrecht, 13 Wall. 434. 

OOXJSINB. second . In will. Sanderson v. Bailey, 2 Mylne & Cr. 56 ; re 

Parker, 14 Ch. Div. 529; 28 W. R. 823; Mayott v. Mayott, 2 Bro. 

C. C. 125 ; Charge v. Goodyer, 3 Russ. 140 ; Corporation of Bridge- 
worth V. Collins, 1 5 Sim. 541. 

OOvjsnAlTT. Magee v. Fisher, 8 Ala. 320; Greenleaf t/. Allen, 127 Mass. 248. 

In contract, Hayne v. Cummins, 16 C. B. (N. S.) 421. 

In deed. Hatch v. White, 22 Pick. 521. 

reaL Davis v. Lyman, 6 Conn. 249. 

COVISNAirra. defendant . Bailey v. White, 3 Ala. 330. 

ftill of aeisure and warranty* In contract for deed. Gregg v. 

Von Phul, I Wall. 274. 

independent . Bailey v. White, 3 Ala. 330. 

mutual . Bailey v. White, 3 Ala. 330. 

COVEBED. by insuranoe. Johnson v. Campbell, 120 Mass. 449. 

COVIN* Mix V. Muzzy, 28 Conn. 166. 

COW. Pomeroy v. Trimper, 8 Allen, 398. 

In indictment. Parker v. State, 39 Ala. 365 ; Taylor v. State, 6 
Humph. 285. 

In statute. People v. Soto, 39 Cal. 68 ; Rex v. Cook, i Leach C. C. 
123; Carruth z'. Grassie, 11 Gray, 211 ; Freeman v. Carpenter, 10 
Vt 433 (33 Am. Dec. 210). 
COW-KSEFEB. In statute. Bell v. Young, 15 C. B. 530. 

GRAFT. In statute. Blandford v. Morrison, 1 5 Q. B. 730 ; Reed v. Ingham, 3 

El. & Bl. 890. 



CRAFT. 



86 



CREDITORS. 



— Continued. 

bay or river 



GBSATB. 



GBSATEB. 



GKEDIBIiB. 



GKEDIT. 



GKEDITOB. 



CBEDITOB8. 



or other boat. In statute. The Wenonah v. Brag- 



don, 21 Gratt. 685. 

other small of light oharaoter propelled by steam. Instatuti. 

United States v. The Mollie, 2 Woods, 318. 

Moore v. City of Reading, 21 Pa. St 188. 

In constitution. People v, Marshall, i Gilm. 672 ; Syracuse City Bk. 
V. Davis, 16 Barb. x88. 

In statute. Edwards v. Bibb, 54 Ala. 475. 

by fraud. In statute. Palmer v. Preston, 45 Vt. 154 (12 Am. 

Rep. 191). 

In statute. Whitlock v. West, 26 Conn. 406. 

disinterested. In statute. Freleigh v. State, 8 Mo. 607. 

witness. Ryan v. Devereux. 26 U. C. Q. B. 100. 

witnesses. In statute. Frink t^. Pond, 46 N. H. 125; Sullivan 

V. Sullivan, 106 Mass. 476; Stewart v. Harriman, 56 N. H. 25: 
Dibble v, Morris, 26 Conn. 417 ; Hall v. Hall, 18 Ga. 40 ; Hawes^/. 
Humphrey, 9 Pick. 350 (?o Am. Dec. 481); Bacon v. Bacon. 17 
Pick. 135; Sparhawk z/. Sparhawk, 10 Allen, 156; Garland v. Crow, 

2 Bailey, 24; Amory t^. Fellows, 5 Mass. 229; Sears v. Dillingham, 
12 Mass. 358; Haven v. Hilliard, 23 Pick. 10; White v. Barrack, 
I M. & W. 425. 

Owen V, Branch Bk., 3 Ala. 258 ; Dry Dock Bk. v. American Ins. Co.. 

3 N. Y. 344 ;^ Rindge v. Judson, 24 N. Y. 64 ; Hulme v. Muggleston, 
3 M. & W. 30. 

In contract. Lyman v. Babcock, 40 Wis. 503. 

In statute. Phoenix Ins. Co. v. Scholes, 20 Wis. 38. 

in oash. In order. Ellison v. CoUingridge, 9 C. B. 571. 

on my aoooiuit. In note. Lee v. Chillicothe Bank, i Biss. 325. 

the drawer. In note. Steckel v. Steckel, 28 Pa. St. 233. 

if you give Mm . In guaranty. Simpson v. Manley, Tyrwh. 76. 



mutual 



Groom v. West, 8 Ad. & Ell. 773. 



In statute. New Jersey Ins. Co. v. Meeker, 8 Vroom, 282 ; Perry v. 
Orr, 6 Vroom, 295 ; Southard v. Benner, 72 N. Y. 424 ; re Poland. 
L. R., I Ch. App. 356 ; Follansbee v. Bird, 8 Cush. 291 ; Waller v. 
Mardus, 29 Mo. 25 ; Noyes v. Blakeman, 6 N. Y. 567 ; Underwood 
V. Ogden, 6 R Mon. 606 ; New Haven Saw Mill Co. v. Fowler, 28 
Conn. 103; Phillips v. Poland, L. R, i C. P. 204; Marsden Steam 
Co. V. Guy, 40 Conn. 166; Wood v. De Mattos, L. R., i Ex. 92; 
Robertson v. Goss, L. R., 2 Ex. 396 f Giflford v. Whitcomb, 9 
Cush. 482 ; Gannard v. Esleva, 20 Ala. 732; Meyer 1/. Car Co., 12 
Otto, 9. 

of the estate. In statute. Chandler v. Stevenson, 68 Mo. 45a 

any . In statute. Belknap v. Ins. Co., 18 N. Y. (S. C.) 282; 

Bongard v. Block, 81 111. 186; Trecothick v. Austin, 4 Mason, 23. 
In Heed. Dingwall v. Edwards, 4 B. & S. 758. 

In statute. Bongard v. Block, 81 111. 186 ; Thompson v. Van Vechten. 
5 Abb. Pr. 458 ; Davis' Appeal, 39 Conn. 395 ; Pierce v. Turner, 5 
Cranch, 454; Martin v. Dryden, 6 111. 187; Walradt v. Brown, 6 
111. 397 ; Kimball v. Cook, 6 III. 423; SchaefFer v. Weed, 8 111. 511 ; 
Boies T/. Henney, 32 III. 130; Loughbridge v. Bowland, 52 Miss. 546; 
U. S. V. McLellan, 3 Sumn. 350. 



CREDITORS. 



87 



CRIMINAL. 



GBEDrrOBS— Continued. 

haying seoority foft their* debts. In statute. Wymer v. 

Kemble, 6 B. Ap C. 484. 

hie . In stattUe. Re Derby, 8 Ben. 1 18. 

judgment . In statute, Lloyd v. Harris, 8 C. B. 72. 



GBSDITB. 



OBEW. 



gbuccon. 



cbhonaIi. 



People V. Hibernia Ins. Co., 3 Cent. L. J. 260. 
In writ. Cummins v. Garvin, 65 Me. 301 . 

and ofltots. In statute, Preston v. Lodge, 39 Cal. 116. 

or effbote. In statutes. Shultz v. Christman, 6 Mo. (App.) 341. 

Schermerhom v, Hudson River R. Co., 38 N. Y. 103. 

In statute. United States v. Winn, 3 Sumn. 209; Millandon v. 
Martin, 6 Rob. (La.) 534. 

or ship's oompany. In statute, U. S. v. Libby, i W. & M. 230. 

any of the . In statute. U. S. v. Harriman, i Hughes, 527. 

the . 



In contract, Frazer v. Hatton, 2 C. B. (N. S.) 525. 



In libel. Gibson v. Cincinnati Enquirer, 5 Cent. L. J. 380. 

McCord V, People, 46 N. Y. 470 ; People v. White, 34 Cal. 183 ; State 
V, Corporation, T. U. P. Charlt. 235 ; Van Meter v. People, 60 IlL 
168. 

In constitution. Re Bergen, 31 Wis. 383. 

In statute. Walton v. Gavin, 16 Q. B. 81 ; State v. Linthicum, 68 
Mo. 66 ; Com. v. Dennison, 24 How. 66. 

against nature. Ausman v. Veal, 10 Ind. 335. 

arising under the revenue ktws. In statute. U. S. v. Husch, 

10 Otto, 33. 

involving moral turpitude. In statute. Filber v. Dauter- 

mann, 26 Wis. 521. 

or ofltase against the laws of Ohina. In statute. Attorney- 



General V. Kwok-a-Sing, L. R., 5 P. C. C. 179. 

other . In constitution. Re Clark, 9 Wend. 212; re Voorhees, 

32 N. J. (L.) 139; Kentucky v. Dennison, 24 How. 66; Morton v. 
Skinner, 48 Ind. 123. 

fblsi. Johnson v. Riley, 13 Ga. 97; Harrison v. State, 55 Ala. 



239; Webb V. State, 29 Ohio St. 351 ; United States v. Block, 4 
Sawy. 211. 

In constitution. Randall v. Brigham, 7 Wall. 523. 

In statute. Van Meters. People, 60 111. 168. 

by bankrupts against bankruptcy laws. In statute. Ex parte 

Terrey, 4 Ex. Div. 63 ; re Counbaye, L. R., 8 Q. B. 410. 

all other not capital. In statute. Mann v. Owen, 9 B. & C. 599. 

In statute. Applegate v. Com., 7 B. Mon. 12. 

In constitution. Grimball v. Ross, T. U. P. Charl. 175 ; 



Floyd V. Comm'rs, 14 Ga. 354. 

In statute. Wiggins v. City of Chicago, 68 111. 372 ; Woodward v. 
Squires, 39 Iowa, 435 ; Com. v. Intoxicating Liquors, 115 Mass. 
142; Mixer T'. Supervisors, 26 Mich. 422. 

process. Ward v. Lewis, i Stew. 26. 

proceeding. In statute. Re Dean of York, 2 Q. B. i. 

prosecution. In constitution. Withers v. State, 36 Ala. 252. 



CRIMINAL. 



88 



CRUELTY, 



CB08S. 



CBIMINAIi — Continued. 

proaeoatioiUL In statute. Com. v. Intoxicating Liquors, 122 

Mass. 8. 

Harrison v. Ricks, 71 N. C. 7 ; Fry v. Jones, 2 Rawle, 1 1. 

In statute. People v. N. Y. Cent R. R., 13 N. Y. 78; Steele t/. 
Northampton Co., 45 Conn. 344. 

the lake. In statute, Sprague v, Birdsell, 2 Cow. 419 ; Cayuga 

Bridge Co. v. Stout, 7 Cow. 33. 

to lot above mentioned. In deed, Comstock v. Van Deusen, 5 

Pick. 163. 

GROSS-BILL. Cross z/. DeValle, i Wall. 5; Ayers v. Carver, 17 How. 591 ; Kidder 

V. Barr, 35 N. H. 235; McDougald v, Dougherty, 14 Ga. 674; 
Tison V, Tison, 14 Ga. 167. 

OBOSS-OOMPLAINT. White v. Reagan, 32 Ark. 281. 

CBOSSINa. the bar. In statute. Bremen v. Bristol. 66 Me. 354. 

GBOSSnTCiS. road . In statute. Tracy t/. T. & B. R. R., 38 N. Y. 433 ; Brace 

V. N. Y. Cent R. R., 27 N. Y. 269. 

In statute. Recknagel v. Murphy, 12 Otto, 197. 

In statute. Com. v. McClellan, loi Mass. 34. 

and unusual punishment. In constitution. United States v. 

Collins, 2 Curtis C. C; 194; Wilkerson v. Utah, 99 U. S. J30; 
Whitten v. State, 47 Ga. 497 ; Com. v. Wyatt, 6 Rand. 694 ; State 
V. Kearney, i Hawks. -54; Barker v. People 3 Cow. 683 (15 Am. 
Dec. 322) ; Pervear v. Com., 5 Wall. 475 ; State v. Pettie, 80 N.C. 
367 (30 Am. Rep. 88); State v. Miller, 75 N. C. 73 ; State v. Drover, 
78 N. C. 423. 

and iTihuman. In statute. Freeman v. Freeman, 31 Wis. 235. 

and Inhuman treatment. In statute. Mason v. Mason, i Edw. 

Ch. 278 ; Kennedy T/. Kennedy, 73 N. Y. 369; Gholston t/. Gholston, 
31 Ga. 625 ; Beyer t/. Beyer, 50 Wis. 254 ; Skinner v. Skinner, 5 Wis. 
449; Johnson v. Johnson, 4 Wis. 137. 

barbarous and Inhuman treatment. In statute. Small v. Small, 

57 Ind. 568 : Finley v. Finley, 9 Dana, 52 ; Thornberry v. Thorn- 
berry, 2 J. J. Marsh, 322 ; Moyler v. Moyler, 11 Ala. 620. 

beat. In indictment. Com. v. Mc Clellan, xoi Mass. 34. 



CBXJDS. 
CBUEL. 



CBUSLTY. 



Evans v. Evans, i Hagg. Con. 35 ; Close v. Close, 6 C. E. Greene, 
338 ; Odom v. Odom, 36 Ga. 286; Dysart v. Dysart, 11 Jur. 490; 
Perry v. Perry, 2 Paige, 501 ; Durant v. Durant, i Hagg. Ecc. 768 
(note) ; Lockeridge v. Lockeridge, 3 Dana, 28 ; Hughes v. Hughes, 
19 Ala. 307 ; Hulme v. Hulme, i Add. Ecc. 29 ; Judge v. State, 58 
Ala. 402; Rhame v. Rhame, i McCord'sCh. 197 (16 Am. Dec. 597). 

In statute. Turner v. Turner, 44 Ala. 437 ; Goodrich v. Goodrich, 44 
Ala. 670 ; Childs v. Childs, 49 Mo. 509. 

and maltreatment. Paterson v. Paterson, 3 H. L. Cas. 308. 

of treatment. In statute. Coles v. Coles, 2 Md. (Ch.) 341 ; 
Daiger v. Dargen 2 Md. (Ch.) 335 ; Tayman v. Tayman, 2 Md. (Ch.) 
393 ; Bowie v. Bowie, 3Md. (Ch.) 51 ; Hoshall v. Hoshall, 51 Md. 72. 

to animals. United States v. Jackson, 4 Cranch C. C. 483; 
Squires v. Whisken, 3 Camp. 140 ; Morris' Case, 6 N. Y. City Hall 
Rec. 62; Stage Horse Cases. 15 Abb. Pr. (N. S.) 51; Stete v. 
Avery. 44 N. H. 302 : Com. v. Lupkin, 7 Allen, 579 ; State v. Briggs. 
I Aiken (Vt), 226; Budge v. Parsons, 3 B. & S. 382. 



CRUELTY, 



89 



CURRENT. 



GBXJELTY — Continued. 

oxtreme 



— . In statute, Warren v. Warren, 3 Mass. 321 ; English 
V, English, 12 C. E. Green, 579; Briggs v, Briggs, 20 Mich. 34; 
Eidenmuller v, EidenmuUer, 37 Cal. 364 ; Fero v, Fero, 98 Mass. 
157; Bailey v, Bailey, 97 Mass. 378 ; Waskam v. Waskam, 31 Miss. 
155; Haskell v, Haskell, 54 Cal. 262; Harratt z/. Harratt, 7 N. H. 
196 (26 Am. Dec. 730). 

extreme and repeated , In statute, Henderson v, Henderson,. 

88 111. 248 ; Harman v, Harman, 16 HI. 85. 

intolerable . In statute, Shaw v, Shaw, 17 Conn. 189. 

The Brutus, 2 Gall. 526. 

neglect. Waltham Bk. v. Wright, 8 Allen, 121. 

In statute, Sykes v, Meacham, 103 Mass. 286. 

negligence. Woodman v, Nottingham, 49 N. H. 387. 

Cni/nVATEI). Held. In statute. State v, Allen, 13 Ired. (L.) 36; State v, Mc* 

Minn, 81 N. C. 585. 

CULTIVATION, state of . In statute, Johnson v. Perley, 2 N. H. 56 (9 Am.. 

Dec. 35). 



CBUIBS. 
CTUIJPABLE. 



CUMULATIVE. 



Yeaton v. Chapman, 6$ Me. 126; DeWitt v, San Francisco, 2 Cal. 

339. 
evidenoe. Glidden v, Dunlap, 28 Me. 379; People v. New 



CURATE. 

CUBE. 
CUBBENC7. 



CUBBEira. 



York Superior Court, 10 Wend. 286 ; Brisbane v, Adams, i Sandf. 
195; Fleming v. Hollenback, 7 Barb. 271 ; Parshall v, Klinck, 43. 
Barb. 203 ; Parker v. Hardy, 24 Pick. 246 ; Waller v. Graves, 20 
Conn. 305 ; Grubb v. Kalb, 37 Ga. 459 ; Able v, Frazer, 43 Iowa, 175. 

Mason v, Lambert, 12 Q. B. 796. 

having the of aoula. In statute. State v. Bray, 13 Ired. 289. 

Lackey v. Miller, Phill. (L.) 26 ; Marine Ins. Co. v, Tincher, 30 IlL 
399 ; Marine Bk. v, Rushmore, 28 111. 46. ; Webster v. Pierce, 35 
111. 158; Willett V, Paine, 43 111. 432; Osgood v, McConnell, 32 
111. 75. 

In contract, Dugan v, Campbell, i Ohio, 115; Campbell v, Hampson, 
id. 1 19 ; Coffin v. Hill, i Heisk. 385 ; Cockrill v, Kirkpatrick. 9 
Mo. 697 ; Huse v, Hamblin, 29 Iowa, 501 (4 Am. Dec. 244) ; Palmer 
V, State Bk., 16 Iowa, 321 ; Farrell v. Fay, 7 Mo. 575 ; Chambers v, 
George, 5 Litt. 335 ; Louden v, Kenney, i Bibb, 330 ; McChord v^ 
Lord, 3 Mon. 167 ; Bennett v* Com., 4 Mon. 108 ; Fleming v, Camp- 
bell, I J. J. Marsh. 499 ; Griswold v, Hepburn, 2 Duv. 33 ; Jones v. 
Overstreet, 4 Mon. 547. 

of the State. Lampton v. Haggard, 3 Mon. 149. 

lUinoiB . Hulbert v. Carver, 37 Barb. 62 ; Chicago re Ins. Co. v^ 

Kerron, 27 111. $01. 

Kentucdcy . Lampton v. Haggard, 3 Mon. 149; Phelps i/. Taylor, 

4 Mon. 170. 

New York State . Ehle v, Chittenango Bk., 24 N. Y. 548. 

bank notes. Pierson v, Wallace, 7 Ark. 282 ; Fleming v. Nail,. 

I Tex. 246. 

ftmds. Galena Ins. Co. v, Kupfer, 28 111. 335 ; Springfield Ins. 

Co. V, Tucker, 30 111. 399 ; Mars v, Kupfer, 34 111. 286 ; Connell v, 
Pumpheyt 9 Ind. 135 ; American Ins. Co. v, Clark, 47 la. 671 ; Piatt 
V. Sauk Co. Bk., 17 Wis. 226 ; Moore v. Morris, 20 111. 255 ; Osgood 
V. McConnell, 32 III. 74. 



12 



CURRENT. 



90 



DAMAGE. 



CUBBSNT — Cootiaiied 

money. Whartoo v. Morris, i Dall. 124; McCord v. Ford, 3 T. 

B. Mon. 166 ; Coco v. Callahmn, 31 La. Ann. 624 ; Jones v. Over- 
street, 4 Mon. $47 ; Bainbridge z/. Owen, 2' J. J. Marsh. 464. 

value. In statute, U. S. v. Sixteen Packages, 2 Mason, 53; 



Tappan v, U. S., 2 Mason, 399. 
year. In iease. Doe v. Morphett. 7 Q. B. 578 ; Doe v. Dobell, i 



CUBTESY. 
CUHTLLAQB. 



CUBVED. 
CUSTODY. 



CUSTOIL 



Q. R806. 

Orr V. Hollidays, 9 B. Mon. 59 ; Ferguson v. Freedy, 56 Barb. 168. 

Com. z/. Barney, 10 Cush. 480; State v. Shaw, 31 Me. 522; Peoples. 
Taylor. 2 Mich. 250; Edwards v, Dickerson, 28 N. J. (L.) 39; Cod- 
dington v. Beebe, 31 N. J. (L.) 477; People v. Gedney, 17 N. Y. (S. 
C.) 151 ; Com. 1/. Barney, 10 Cush. 480 ; Reg v, Gilbert, i C. k. K. 
84 ; Fisher v. State, 43 Ala. 7. 

In statute, Iney z/. State, 61 Ala. 59; Mason v, R. Co., L. R., 6 Eq. 
Cas. loi ; State v, Shaw, 31 Me. 523. 

line. In statute. Mayor v, Comm'rs, 113 Mass. 161. 

Cutler?/. Howe, 122 Mass. 541. 

In sentence. Smith v. Com., 59 Pa. St. 320. 

In statute. Roll and v. Com., 82 Pa. St. 306. 

pioouring hie discharge lh>m the . In statute. Foxall v. Bar- 

nett, 2 El. & BI. 928. 

sent Ibr in . In warrant, Howard v, Gosset, 10 Q. 6. 4cx>. 

Hall V. Nottingham, L. R., i Ex. Div. i ; Broussard v, Bernard, 7 La. 
211 ; Bodfish v. Fox, 23 Me. 90; Barnard v, Kellogg, 10 Wall. 383; 
Wilcox V. Wood, 9 Wend. 346 ; Mayor of Linn Regis v. Taylor, 3 
Lev. 160. 



CXTSTOMABY. 

GUSTOMEB. 
CUT. 



. In contract. Stewart v. West India Co., L. R., 8 Q. B. 

363. 

in OOnlbrmity with the of this plaoe. In marriage contract. 

Wilkinson v. Am. Iron Mut. Co., 20 Mo. 122. 

despatoh. In charter party. Smith v, (lojaoo ft. Yellow Lum- 



OY. 



her, 2 Fed. Rep. 396. 
McLean v, Dunn, 39 U. C. (Q. B.) 551. 

State V, Patza, 3 La. Ann. 512 ; Atkinson's Case, i Russ. &. Ry. 104; 

Rex V. McDemott, Russ. & Ry. 336 ; Rex v, Hayward, Russ. & 

Ry. 78. 
down or otherwise destroy. In statute. Rex v. Taylor, i Russ. 

& Ry. 373. 
glass. In statute. Binns v, Lawrence, 12 How. 9. 

off. Tillotson V. H. R. R. R., 9 N. Y. 575 ; Rex v, Harris, 7 C. & 

P. 446 ; State v. Mairs, Coxe (N. J.), 453. 

tobaoco. In statute. Venable v. Richards, i Hughes, 327. 

HI . In note, Hulburt v. Carver, 37 Barb. 62. 

newspaper. In statute, Richardson v, Tobin, 45 Cal. 30. 



DAM. 



DAMAGE. 



In statute. People v. Gaige, 23 Mich. 93. 
fishing mill . In statute. Gamctt v. Backhouse, 8 R & S. 49a 

Fay V. Parker, 53 N. H. 342. 
In bill of lading. Taylor v. Liverpool Steam Co., L. R., 9 Q. B. 546. 



DAMAGE. 



91 



DANGERS. 



DAICAGS 



Continued. 

In statute. Smith v. Brown* L. R., 6 Q. B. 729 : The Franconia, 2 
Prob. Div. 163; Jubb v. Hull Dock Co., 9 Q. B. 443; Herring v. 
Board of Works. 19 C. B. (N. S.) 526. ^ 

any firame. In statute. Rex v, Tracy, i Russ. & Ry. 453. 

' to goods while in transit. In bill of lading, Menzell v, R. Co., 

I Dillon, 531. 

to the person. In statute, Norton v, Sewall, 106 Mass. 144. 

with intent to render useless. In statute. Queen v, Fisher, 

L. R., I C. C. R. 9- 
any to any goods. In bill of lading, Taylor v, Liverpool, etc.» 



DAMAQES. 



DAMAGINQ. 

DAMNUM. 
DANCING. 



DAKGSBS. 



R. Co., L. R., 9 Q. a 546. 
breakage, leakage or — 



In bill of lading, Czech v. General 



Steam Nav. Co., L. R., 3 C. P. 3. 
Hunt V, Smith, 9 Kans. 137. 
In appeal bond, ■ U. S. v, Addison, 6 Wall. 291. 

_ • 

In injunction bond, Hannibal, etc.. R. R. v, Shepley. i Mo. (App.) 
256 ; Hovey v. Rubber Tip. Pencil Co., 50 N. Y. 335. 

In reference, Samson v. Young, 50 "N. H. 62. 

In statute, Owen v, Brockschmidt, 54 Mo. 285 ; Martin v. Martin, 2 
Green, 125; Bartholomew v, Chapin. 10 Mete. 3; Hann. Bridge 
Co. V, Shaubacker, 56 Mo. 582 ; Guild v. Guild, 2 Mete. 231 ; Puc- 
quette v, Pickness, 19 Wis. 223; State v, Ryan, 2 Mo. (App.) 303; 
Griffin v, Mortimer, 8 Wend. 538 ; Chase v, Ingalls. 97 Mass. 524; 
Abraham's Case, i Rob. 676 ; Hays v, Briggs, 3 Pitts. 504 ; Catlett 
V. Brodie, 9 Wheat. 553 ; Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co. v. Van 
Antwerp, 9 Off. Pat. G.az. 497 ; Woodman v, Nottingham, 49 N. H. 
387; White V. Steele, 13 C. B. (N. S.) 231 ; Wendell v, Washington 
Bk., 5 Cow. 161. 

- — oosts and expenses. In covenant. Low v. Archer, 12 N. Y. 277. 

aoddents or of the seas of whatever nature or kind what- 
soever. In bill of lading, Lloyd v. General Iron Screw Co.. 3 H. 
& C. 285. 

actual . In statute, Stephens v. Felt, 2 Blatchf. 38. 

oosts and . In bond, Corcoran v, Judson. 24 N. Y. 106. 

general . Bristol Manuf. Co. v, Gridley, 28 Conn. 201. 

just tor delay. In U, S, Supreme Court Rules, Jerome v, Mc- 

Carter, 21 Wall. 17. 

liquidated . In contract, Lampham 7/. Cochran, 16 N. Y. 275; 

Bagley v, Peddie, 16 N. Y. 469. 

special . Bristol Manuf. Co. v, Gridley, 28 Conn. 201. 

Rex V, Whittingham, 9 C. & P. 234 ; Rex v, Tracy, Russ. & Ry. 452 ; 

Rex V, Norris, 9 C. &. P. 241. 
&tale. Thickston v, Howard, 8 Blackf. 335, 

In statute, Quaglieni v. Matthews, 6 B. & S. 482. 

iinneoessary or peril. In policy of insurance, Ins. Co. v, 

Seaver, 19 Wall. 531. 

and aooidents of the seas and navigation. In bill of lading, 

Laurie v, Douglass, 1 5 M. & W. 746. 

inoident to the navigation of the river. In bill of lading. The 

Wathan, 13 Opin. Atty.-Gen. 119. • . 



DANGERS. 



92 



DATE. 



DANQEB8 — Continued. 

of lake navigation. In bill of lading. Transportation Co. v. 

Downer, 11 Wall. 129. 
« of navigation. In bill of lading. The Rooket, i Biss. 354; The 



DANaSBOUS. 



DANSEUSE. 
DATE. 



Portsmouth, 9 Wall. 682 ; Plaistedz^. Boston, etc., Nav. Co., 27 Me. 
132; Steamboat Co. v. Bason, Harp. 262; Cowley z/. Davidson. 15 
Minn. 92 ; The New Jersey, Olcott, 44 ; Marsh v, Blythe, i McCord. 
360; Lloyd V. General Iron Screw Co., 3 H. & C. 284; The City of 
Norwich, 3 Ben. 575 ; Grill v. General Iron Screw Co., L. R.. i C. 
P. 600; L. R., 3 C. P. 476; Van Hein v, Taylor, 7. Rob. 201 ; White- 
sides z^. Thurl kill, 12 S. & M. S99; Williams v, Bronson, i Murph. 
(S. C.) 417 (4 Am. Dec. 562) ; Hand v, Baynes, 4 Whart. 404 (33 Am. 
Dec. 204). 

— of the river. In bill of lading. Grey v. Mobile Trade Co.. SS 
Ala. 388; Williams v, Bronson. i Murphey, 417 (4 Am. Dec. 562); 
Steamboat Co. v. Basin, Harp. (S. C.) 262 ; Wbitesides v, Russell, 
8 W. &. S. 44 ; Gilmore v. Carman, i S. & M. 279 ; Garrison v, Mem- 
phis Ins. Co.. 19 How. 312; Merrill v, Arey, 3 Ware. 215; Cox v, 
Peterson, 30 Ala. 608 ; Union MuL Ins. Co. v. Indianapolis, etc.. R. 
Co., I Disney, 480; Jones z/. Pitcher, 3 St.& P. 135 ; McClure v. Cox, 
32 Ala. 617 ; Hibler v, McCartney, 31 Ala. 501 ; Sampson v, Gaz- 
zam, 6 Port. 123; Ezzell t/. Miller, 6 Port. 307; Ezzell v. English. 
6 Port. 31 1 ; Hatchett v. The Compromise, 12 La. Ann. 783 ; Broad- 
well V, Butler, i Newb. 171 ; Mahon v. The Olive Branch, 18 La. 
Ann. 107 ; Cox v, Peterson, 30 Ala. 608. 

— of the roads. In bill of lading, De Rothschild v. Royal Mail 
Steam Co., 7 Ex. 734. 

— of the seas. In bill of lading, Harvey v. Pike. N. C. Terra 



Rep. 82 ; Pickering v, Barkley, i Style. 132 ; Baxter v, Leland, Abb. 
Adm. 348 ; Jones v. Pitcher. 3 St. & P. 135 ; Dibble v, Morgan, i 
Woods, 406; Merrill v, Arey, 3 Ware. 215 ; The Star of Hope, 17 
Wall. 651 ; Phelps v, Williamson, 5 Sandf. 578; Aymer v, Astor, 
6 Cow. 266; The Antionetta C, S Ben. 564; The Patria, L. R..3 
Adm. 436; Spence v, Godwich, 10 Q. B. 517: The Reeside, 2 Sumn. 
567. 

In bond, U. S. v. Hall, 2 Wash. C. C. 366. 

In charter party, U. S. v. Hall, 6 Cranch, 171. 

or aooi d en t s of navigation. In bill of lading. The Miletus, s 

Blatchf. 335. 
Fernandez v, Sacramento City R. Co.. 52 Cal. 45. 

lunatio. In statute, Reg. v, Barnsley, 12 Q. B. 193. 

weapon. U. S. v. Small. 2 Curt. C. C. 241 ; Com. v, O'Brien, 



119 Mass. 342 : Pinson v. State, 23 Tex. 579; U. S. v. Wilson, Bald. 
78 ; U. S. V, Wood, 3 Wash. C. C. 440. 
In contract. Baron v, Placide, 7 La. Ann. 229. 

Ing^rsoll V, Kirby, Walk. 27. 

In note. Sturdy v, Henderson. 4 B. & Aid. 593. 

In statute, Upston v, Marchant, 2 B. & C. 11. 

of issue. In statute, De Florez z/. Reynolds, 17 Blatchf. 450. 

of the last work done or materials Aimished. In statute^ 

Bement v, Trenton Loco. Works, 32 N. J. (L.) 513. 

after . In statute, Williams v, Jarnett, S B. & Adol. 32. 

after of appointment. In statute, U. S. v, Moore, 5 Otto, 760. 

flrom such . In statute, U. S. v, Moore, 5 Otto, 760. 



DA UGHTERS. 93 DEADL Y. 

DAUQHTEBS. In will, Terpening v. Skinner, 29 N. Y. 50$. 

DAY. Fulton t/. Drake, 5 Hurl. & N. 648 ; Noxon v. Freeman, $ Hurl, k N. 

653. 

In contract, Horton v, Locke, 5 Hill, 437. 

In statute, Kane v. Com., 89 Pa. St. 522 ; Pulling v. People, 8 Barb. 
384. 

Ibr argument. In rule of court. Parr v, Jewell, 16 



C. B. 685. 

— of hearing. In statute, Fletcher v. Baker, L. R., 9 Q. B. 370. 

— of trial. In statute. Green v, Charlotte R. Co., 6 Rich. (S. C.) 



342. 

flrrt of July. In statute, Burch v, Newbury, 10 N. Y. 374. 

on a oertain. In statute, Reg. v. Congers, 8 Q. B. 988. 

tenth . In statute, Michie v. Michie, 17 Gratt. 109. 

DATS. Brown v, Buzan, 24 Ind. 194; Hampton v, Erenyeller, 2 Browne, 18; 

Blake v, Crowninshield, 9 N. H. 304; Chiles v. Smith, 9 N. H. 304; 
Deyot/. Bleckley, 24 Barb. 9; Lester t/. Garland, 15 Ves. 248; Wells 
V, Hull, 19 Conn. 376. 

In charter party, Cochran v. Rethberg, 3 Esp. 121 ; Higgins v, U. S. 
Mail Steam Co., 3 Blatchf. 282. 

In statute, Taylor v. Palmer, 31 Cal. 240 ; Miles v, McDermott, 31 Cal. 
271 ; National Bk. v, Williams, 46 Mo. 17 ; Burton v, Chicago, 53 
111. 87. 

at least five before the day of election. State v. Gasconade 

Co., 33 Mo. 102. 

at least ten between the day of service and the first day of 

the next term. In statute, Robinson v, Foster, 12 Iowa, 186. 

four entire . In statute. Furnell v. Smith, 7 B. & C. 693. 

not less than five nor more than ten after the date of the 

warrant. In statute. Abraham's Catie, i Rob. (Va.) 676. 

plea in four . In order of court. Dunn v. Hudson, i D. & L. 204. 

seven time Ibr pleading. In order of court, Pepperell v, Dur- 

rell, 2 Dow. Prac. Cas. 674. 

ten notioe. In statute. Hahn v. Dierkes, 37 Mo. 574. 

thirty belbre suit. In statute. Thomas v. Affleck. 16 Pa. St. 14. 

three . In statute, Bouligny v. White, 5 La. Ann. 31. 

two • In statute. State v. McLendon, 1 Stew. 195. 

within Ibnr after the adjottmment. In statute. Neal v. Crew, 

12 Ga. 93. 

within six • In statute, Patchin v. Bonsack, 52 Mo. 431. 

within ten . In statute.^ People v. New York, etc., R. Co., 28 

Barb. 284. 

within thirty . Swift v, Tansey, 5 Ind. 196; Faure v. CJ. S., 23 

Ind. 48; Galltt/. Finch, 24 How. Pr. 193. 

BAY-TIMB In bond. Trull v. Wilson, 9 Mass. 154. 

BEAD. animals. In city ordinance. Underwood v. Green, 42 N. Y. 140. 

weight. In contract. Cunnin^rhani v. Dun, 3 C. P. Div. 443. 

DEADLY. weapon. Com. v, Branham, 8 Bush, 387 ; Flournoy v. State, 16 

Tex. 31 ; State v. Jarrott, i I red. 76. 

/// indictment. State v. Harper, 69 Mo. 425. 



DEAL. 



94 



DEBT, 



DEAL. 



DSALEB. 



DEAIiEBS. 



DEAUNG. 



In statute. Clifford v. State, 29 Wis. 329. 

in goodBy wares and merohandiae. In charter. Bates v. State 

Bk., 2 Ala. (N. S.) 7^1, 

or trade in; In charter, Fleckner v. Bank of the U. S., 8 Wheat. 



451. 
in the selling. In statute. State v. Paddock, 24 Vt. 312. 

purohase or in land. In charter. Blunt z/. Walker, 1 1 Wis. 334. 

Vernon v, Manhattan Co., 17 Wend. 524. 

In statute, Goodwin v, Clark, 65 Me. 126 ; Overall if. Bezeau, 37 Mich. 
506 ; Studdy v, Sanders, 5 B. & C. 639. 

in second hand books. In city ordinance. Eastman v. Chicago, 

79 111. 178. 
in spirits. In statute. Wetherell v. Jones, 3 B. & Adol. 225. 



in spirituous liquors. In statute. State v. Dow, 21 Vt. 484. 

Intobaooo. In statute. Carter v. State, 44 Ala. 29. 

carries on the business of a wholesale liquor . In statute. U. 

S. V, Johnson, i Hughes, 531. 
wholesale liquor . In statute. U. S. v. Fiegelstock, 14 Blatchf. 

321. 
In statute. State v. Yearby, 82 N. C. 561. 

in goods, wares and merchandise. In statute, Berks Co. v, 

Bertolet, 13 Pa. St. 525. 
in malt liquors. U. S. v. Wittigg, 3 Cent. L. J. 270. 



In statute, Brewin v. Short, 5 El. & BI. 230. 

in commercial jNiper. In corporation charter, Bulkley v, 

Briggs, 30 Mo. 452. 
or trading. In U, S, Bank charter, B^ik of U. S. v, Wag- 



DEAIJNGH3. 

DEATH. 

DEBAUCH. 
DEBAUCHED. 



gener, 9 Peters, 378. 

— and transactions with any bankrupt. In statute, Graham v. 



. Furber, 14 C. B. 135 ; Tucker v, Barrow, 3 C. & P. 85. 

at her . In will. David v. Brossman, 2 Yerg. 557. 

in case of the . In will. Galland v, Leonard, i Swanst. Ch. 161. 

Wood V, Matthews, 47 Iowa, 409 ; Koenig v, Nott, 2 Hik. 323. 

habits. Wickwire's Appeal, 30 Conn. 86. 



DEBENTXTBES. In will. Re Lane, 14 Ch. Div. 857. 

DlBSEfV. U. S. V, Colt, I Pet. C. C. 145 ; Zinn v. Ritterman, 2 Abb. Pr. N. S. 

261 ; Andrews v, Murray, 9 Abb. Pr. 8 ; Weston v. City of Syracuse, 
17 N. Y. no; Garrison v. Howe, 17 N. Y. 458; Elwood v. Derfen- 
dorf, 5 Barb. 398 ; People v. Arguello, 37 Cal. 524 ; Scott v, Daven- 
port, 34 Iowa, 308 ; Baltimore v. Gill, 31 Md. 375 ; City of Camden 
V. Allen, 26 N. J. (L. ) 398. 

In constitution. Morgan v. State, 47 Ala. 34 ; Caldwell v. State, 55 
Ala. 133; People v. Flagg, 46 N. Y. 401 ; Newell v. People, 7 N. Y. 
9; Mussert/. Stewart, 21 Ohio St. 353. 

In statute, Weston v. City of Syracuse, 17 N. Y. no; Innes v. East 
India Co., 17 C. B. 351 ; Esmond v. Bullard, 16 Hun, 65 ; Flanagan 
V. Watkins. 3 B. & Aid. 191 ; Clingman v, Kemp, 57 Ala. 19s; Dow- 
ling z^. Stewart, 4 111. 193; Lowell v, Comni's, 106 Mass. 540; Cald- 
well V. State, 55 Ala. 135 ; re Greenskill, L. R., 8 C. P. 24 ; Camp v. 
Grant, 21 Conn. 54; State v. Gambs, &S Mo. 289; Hodsall v. Bax- 
ter, I El. B. & El. 885 ; Dunlop v. Keith, i Leigh, 430 ; ex parte Reed, 
4 Cranch C. C. 582 ; Queen v. Guardians, L. R., 9 Q. B. 383 ; re 



DEBT. 



95 



DEBTS. 



1SEBP2 — Continued. 

Derby's estate, 3 Ch. Div. 290; Parker «/.,Ince. 4 Hurl. & N. 54.; 
Dryden v, Kellc^ig, 2 Mo. (App.) 88 ; ex parte Kaye, i B. & Ad. 652 ; 
Kelton V, Phillips, 3 Mete. 62; Stokes v. Mason, 10 R. I. 261: 
Crouch V, Gridley, 6 Hill, 250; Kellogg v, Schuyler, 2 Denio, 73; 
re Colton, 2 N. Y. Leg. Obs. 370 ; Cook v, Newman, 8 How. Pr. 
523; Warner t/. Cammack, 37 Iowa, 642 ; Smith v, Owens, 17 Wis. 
397 ; Thompson v. Harding, 3 C. B. (N. S.) 264. 

aooount, daim or demand. In statute. Boyle v. Brandon, 1 3 

M. & W. 741. 

agaiDBt the estate. In statute. Prince v. Prince, 47 Ala. 284. 

arising out of or founded on a contract. In constitution. 

Cotton V. Sharpstein, 14 Wis. 226 ; re Mowry, 12 Wis. 53. 

contracted. In statute, Williams?/. Harding, L. R., i H. L. Cns. 



DSBTOB. 



DSBT8. 



9 ; Armstrong v, Cowles, 44 Conn. 44 ; Cox v, Gould, 4 Blntchf. 

345. 

— de&ult or miscarriage. In statute, Birkmyr v, Darnell. 2 Ld. 
Ray. io8s ; Kirkhain v. Master, 2 B. & Aid. 613 ; Castling v, Aubert, 
2 East, 32s : Turner v, Hubbell, 2 Day, 457 ; Combs v, Harshaw, 63 
N. C. 198; Hayes 7/. Burkham, 51 Ind. 130; Conneratt/. Goldsmith. 
6 Ga. 14; Read ?/. TTash, i Wils. 305 ; Winckworth v. Mills, 2 Esp. 
484. 

— due to the United States. In statute, U. S. v. State Bk., 6 



Peters, 29. 

— existing at the time of the adjudication of bankruptcy. In 

statute, Zimmerz/. Schleehauf, 11$ Mass. 52. 

-^or damages. In statute. Doe v, Reynolds, 10 B. & C. 4S1 : 
Chase v, Ingalls, 97 Mass. 524. 

— or damages demanded. In statute. Clay v. Barlow, 123 Mass. 
378. 

— or demand. In statute, Hibbard v, Clark, 56 N. H. 1 55 : White 
V, Hunt, 6 N. J. (L.) 415. 

— upon record. Attorney-General v, Sewell, 4 M. & W. 77. 
present or any Aiture . In contract, Martin v, Wright. 6 



In statute, Westcott v, Hodges, 



Q. B. 919. 
surety for, or liable fbr any — 

5 B. & Aid. 1 5. 

Gifford V, Whitcomb, 9 Cush. 483 ; Stanley v, Ogden, 2 Root, 259. 

In statute, Lanckton v, Wolcott, 6 Mete. 307 ; New Haven Saw Mill 
Co. V, Fowler, 28 Conn. 103 ; Smith v, Omans, 17 Wis. 397. 

In statute, Pratte v, Scott, 19 Mo. 625. 

Green v, Gruber, 26 La. Ann. 694. 

In constitution. State v, Beackmo, 8 Blatchf. 246. 

In power. Berg v, Radcliff, 6 Johns. Ch. 302. 

In statute. Pease v, Folger, 14 Mass. 264 (7 Am. Dec. 213); Atlas Bk. 
V, Nahant Bk., 3 Mete. 582; Wright v. Fairchild, 2 B. & Ad. 730; 
Stanton v, Wilkerson. 8 Ben. 387 ; Askew v. Hale Co., 54 Ala. 639 ; 
Cable V. Gaty, 34 Mo. 573; Perry v. Washburn, 20 Cal. 318 : Lane 
Co. V, Oregon. 7 Wall. 71; Hepburn v, Griswold, 8 Wall. 603; 
Kimpston v, Bronson, 45 Barb. 618; Lewis v. New York Cent. R. 
Co.. 49 Barb. 330; McGorn z\ Shirk, 54 111. 408 ; Wilson v, Morgan, 
4 Robt. 58; Babcock v. Lillis, 4 Bradf. 218 ; Sillis* case, 4 Abb. Pr. 



JJEBTS. 



96 



DECISION. 



DEBTS —Continued. 

272 ; Pine v, Rikert, 21 Barb. 469; Holman v. Bennettp 44 Miss. 322: 
People V, Halsey, 53 Barb. 547 ; Longworth v. Mitchell, 26 Ohio St. 
334; Dutton V, Palaret, 52 Pa. St. 109; ex parte Tower, i N. Y. 
Leg. Obs. 8; ex parte King, i N. Y. Leg. Obs. 276; Spalding v. 
People, 7 Hill, 301 ; Brown v. Lamb, 6 Mete. 203 , Hargroves v. 
Chambers, 30 Ga. 58; Mill Dam Foundry v, Hovey, 21 Pick. 417; 
Haynes v. Brown, 36 N. H. 545 ; Andrews v, Murray, 9 Abb. Pr. 8 ; 
Cable z/. McCune, 26 Mo. 371; McHaig z/. Eastman, 35 How. Pr. 
205; Oviatt V, Hughes, 41 Barb. 541; Leggettt/. Bk. of Sing Sing, 
24 N. Y. 283 ; Sewall v. Lancaster Bk., 17 S. & R. 285 ; Rogers v. 
Huntington Bk., 12 S. & R. ^^, Howe v. Sheppard, 2 Sumn. 150; 
re Morse, 17 Blatchf. 74 ; U. S. v. Pacific R. Co., 4 Dill. 68. 

In will. Martin v. Gage, 9 N. Y. 398. 

and liabilitieB. In plea, Stanton v, Wilkeson. 9 Ben. 357. 

and liabUities provable. In statute. Re Drapery Co., $ Ch. 



DECEASE. 
DECEIT. 

DECIDE. 



DECIDED. 



DECISION. 



Div. 248. 

— oontraoted. In statute, • Carver v, Braintree Manuf. Co., 2 
Story C. C. 432. 

— due firom the deceased. In statute, U. S. v. Eggleston, 4 Saw- 
yer, 199. 

-- due to 8Uoh bankrupt. In statute, Sullivan v. Bridge, i Mass. 
511. 

— dues, demands or claims now due or to grow due. In bond. 
Springsteen v\ Samson, 32 N. Y. 703. 

— of her husband. In statute, Kennedy v, Lange, 50 Md. 94. 

— or demands. In statute, Hibbard v, Clark. $6 N. H. 155. 

— payable by law out of his personal estate. In statute. Per- 



cival V. Queen, 3 H. & C. 217. 

all due and owing. In will, Essington v, Vashon, 3 Mer. 434. 

all owing or aocruing. In statute, Mitchell v, Lee, 8 B. & S. 

99 ; Dresser v, Johns, 6 C. B. (N. S.) 434 : Jones v. Thompson, i 
El. B. & El. 64. 

existing of the corporation. In statute. Cable v. McCIure, 26 

Mo. 371. 
my just to be first paid. In will, Owen v. Ellis, 64 Mo. 77. 

whatever . In will Carr v. Carr, i Mer. 541. 

ftom and after the . In will. Gibson v. Walker. 20 N. Y. 476. 

Fanvell v. Metcalf, 61 111. 373. 

In statute. State v. Christianbury. Busb. (L.) 46. 

/// 7uilL Morrow v, Battison, i App. Cas. 428. 

— ^ or take part in the decision. In statute. Corning v, Slosson, 
16 N. Y. 294. 

Tallnian v. Cook, 43 la. 330. 

In bill of exceptions. Cotton v, Bradley, 38 Ala. 506. 

In statute, Reg. v. Padwick, 8 El. & Bl. 707. 

Houston V, Williams, 13 Cal. 27. 

In statute, Wilson v. Vance, 55 Ind. 394; Hanna v, Comm*s, 29 Ind. 
170. 

of the collector of customs. In statute. U. S. v. Cousinery, 

7 Ben. 251. 



DECISION. 97 DEED. 

DSdBION — Continued. 

or order. In siaiuie. Re Greaves, 13 Ch. Div. 882. 

judgment or • In statute. Estey v» Scheckler, 36 Wis. 434. 

DECEB. on the or guards of any steamer. In statute. Union Ins. Co. 

V, Shaw, 2 Dul. 14. 

I>ECIiAItATION. People v. Strong, 30 Cal. 151. 

In statute, U. S. v, Ambrose, 2 Fed. Rep. 556. 
BEdiABATIONS. In insurance policy, Knecht v. Mutual Ins. Co., 90 Pa. St. 118. 

In insurance policy, Knecht v. Mutual Ins. Co., 90 Pa. St. 120. 

and affirm. In affidavit. Basset v. Dean, 17 N. J. (L.) 432. 

his interest. In statute. Liquidators v, Coleman, L. R., 6 H. 

L. 189. 

suoh admixture. In statute. Pope v, Teall, L. R., 9 C. P. 500. 



DEdiABED. In statute. King v. Inhabitants, 4 B. & Adol. 465. 

cneated or • In statute, McClellan v, McClellan, 65 Me. 500 

to appeal. In statute, Groner v. Hield, 22 Wis. 207. 

In statute, McLanahan v. Maxwell, 28 Cal. 7$. 

or judgment. In contract, Russell v, Lathrop, 117 Mass. 425. 

or judgment establishing the yalidity of said patent. In 

contract, Russell v, Lathrop, 122 Mass. 300. 

Bubjeoting to sale. In statute. Ware v, McDonald, 62 Ala. 82. 

In statute, Pratt v, Pratt, 5 Mo. (App.) 539. 

DEDICATED. Com. v, Matthews, 122 Mass. 60; Methodist Episcopal Church v, 

Hoboken, 33 N. J. (L.) 13; Baton Rouge v. Bird, 21 La. Ann. 244; 
Minnesota v, Bachelder, i Wall. 109 ; Bartlett v, Crittenden, 5 Mc- 
Lean, 32 ; Pulte V, Derby, 5 McLean, 328. 

DEDICATION. Minnesota v, Bachelder, i Wall. 109; Irwin v, Dixon, 9 How. 10; 

Barteau v. West, 23 Wis. 416; Hunter v. Trustees of Sandy Hill, 6 
Hill, 407; Mayor, etc., of Macon v, Franklin, 12 Ga. 239; Branch 
V, Collier, 56 Mo. 160 ; Grogan v. Town of Haywood, 4 Fed. Rep. 
161 ; Robertson v. Town of Wellsville, i Bond, 81. 

DEDUdBIS. . of reoord. In statute. Mattison v. Walker, i Biss. 62. 

DEDTTCfTION. In statute, Stevenson v. Hare, 2 Sawyer, 585. 

Whitney v. Sweet, 22 N. H. 10; McCabe v. Hunter, 7 Mo. 355 ; Ham- 
mond V, Alexander, i Bibb, 333 ; Long v, Ramsey, i S. & R. 72 ; 
Taylor V. Glazer, 2 S. & R. 502; Wing v. Chase, 35 Me. 260; Hol- 
land V, Rogers, 33 Ark. 252 ; Wood v, Owings, i Cranch, 239. 

In contract. Hell man v. Howard, 44 Cal. loi ; Parker v, McAlister» 
I4lnd. 12; Brown V. Gammon, 14 Me. 276; Ketchum v, Everston» 
13 Johns. 359 ; Pomeroy v. Drury, 14 Barb. 418. 

In mortgage, Eaton v. White, 18 Wis. 517. 

In statute. Queen v. Morton, L. R., 2 C. C. R. 22 ; Sturman v. Crav- 
ens. 29 Ark. 557 ; People v. Caton, 25 Mich. 388 ; Pfeaflf v. Roche, 50 
Md. 273 ; Reg. v. Fauntleroy, i C. & P. 421 ; Rex v. Lyon, i Russ. 
& Ry. 255 ; Rex. v. Fauntleroy, i Moody, 52 ; American Ins. Co. v, 
Avery, 60 Ind. 566. 

not otherwise oharged. In statute, Clayton v, Burtenshaw, 5 

B. & C. 4S ; Wilson v. Smith, 12 M. & W. 401. 

of eonveyanoe* In statute, Lemay v, Poupenez, 43 Mo. 71. 

«3 



DELIVER. 



XOO 



DEMISE. 



DELIVEB — Continued. 

to . In contract, Shelton 7/. French. 33 Conn. 489. 

DEUVEBANCE. In statute, Lisher ?/. Pierson, 2 Wend. 345. 

DEIJVEBED. — 



DEUVEBY. 



DEHAND. 



DEMANDS. 



DEMEETIA. 

DEMzmms. 



•iH, i» 



— a aigned bill. In statute, Philby v. Hazle, 8 C. E (N. S.) 647. 

— in exeoution. In statute, Hatton v. Haywood, L. R., 9 Ch. 
App. 229. 

to the payee or some peraon in his behalf! In dsed, Hutch« 



inson V. Heywortb, 9 Ad. A Ell. 375. 

Dixon 7'. Yates, 5 B. & Ad. 340; Willis v. Willis, 6 Dana, 49 ; Black t^. 
Shreve, 13 N. J. Eq. 455 ; Kirk v. Turner, i Dev. Eq. 14; 0*Bannon 
V, Southern Ex. Co., 51 Ala. 481 ; Ostrander v. Brown, 15 Johns. 
39; Reed v. Philadelphia, etc., R. Co., 3 Houst. 176 ; Mallet t^. Page, 

8 Ind. 364 ; Lambeth v. Wells, 12 Rob. 51'; Coleman v, Parker, lu 
Mass. 30 : Morse 7/. Sherman, 106 Mass. 433 ; Pickett v. Reed, 31 
Ark. 131 ; Little Rock R. Co. v. Page, 35 Ark. 304. 

In statute. Bell v, Bament, 9 M. & W. 37. 

to market. In contract, Farrington v. Meek. 30 Mo. 578. 

awaiting • Railroad Co. v. Manuf. Co., 16 Wall. 318. 

befbre • In contract, Pettitt v. Mitchell, 4 Man. & G. 138. 

Sands v, Codwise, 4 Johns. 536 : re Denny, 2 Hill. 220 ; Saddlesvene 
V, Arms, 32 How. Pr. 280 ; Musson v. Lake, 4 How. 262. 

In statute, . Heacock v. Sherman, 14 Wend. 58 ; Lawrence v, Wilcox, 
II Ad. & Ell. 941 ; White v. Hunt, i Halst. 415; Queen v. Guard- 
ians, L. R., 9 Q. B. 383; McCausland's Estate, 52 Cal. 568,- Bick- 
ford V, Barnard, 8 Allen, 31 5. 

of any debt. In statute, Mitchell v, Shelton, 35 Conn. 3. 

originally exceeding five pounds. In statute, Elsley z/. Kirby, 

9 M. & W. 539. 

on • In note, Aldous v, Cornwall, 9 B. & S. 615. 

two years after ^date on . In note. State Bank v. Fox, 3 

Blatchf. 431. 

— and claims. In sale of property of corporation, Vilas v, Farwell, 
9 Wis. 462. 

In statute. State Bank v. Tutt,^44 Mo. 367 ; Baker v, Runkle, 41 Mo. 
392. 

all • In contract, Vedder v. Vedder, i Den. 257 ; Marks v, Mar- 
riott, I Ld. Ray. 114 ; Henry v, Henry; 11 Ind. 236 ; Mayor of New 
York V, Lord, 17 Wend. 285 ; 18 id. 126 ; Bigbee v. Coombs. 64 Mo. 
829 : Edwards v. Smith, 63 Mo. 128. 

Dennett v, Dennett, 44 N. H. 531 ; Hall v. Unger, 2 Abb. (U. S) 507. 

non curat lex. Marshall v, Peters. 12 How. Pr. 218 ; Woolsey 

V, Judd, 4 Duer, 595; Seneca Road Co. v. Auburn, 5 Hill, 170; 
Ellicott, etc., Road Co. v. Buffalo, etc., R. Co.. 20 Barb. 644. 

In contract, Messent v, Reynolds, 3 C. B. 200. 

In lease, Maedert/. Carondelet. 26 Mo. 112; Blair z/. Rankin, 11 Mo. 
440; Magee v. Fisher, 8 Ala. 320; Sumner v, Williams, 8 Mass. 
201 ; Grannis v, Clark, 8 Cow. 36; Cranch v, Foule, 9 N. H. 219: 
Folts V, Huntley, 7 Wend. 210, Stott v, Rutherford, 92 U. S 107 ; 
Frost V, Bollares, 5 B. & C. 613; Jackson v, Benson, i McClelland, 
64; Hart V, Windsor, 12 M. & W. 84. 



DEMISE, lOI DEPOT. 



— Continued. 

Indeed. Moneypenny v. Money penny, 9 H. L. Cas. 114; Spratt i/. 
Jeffrey, 10 B. & C. 26a; Hurde v. Gray, i Man. & G. 206; Foster 
V. Peyser, 9 Cush. 246. 

Ik statute, Voorhees v, Presbyterian Church, 5 How. Pr . 58. 

- . — lease ^nd to fiirm let. In lease. Crouch v, Fowle, 9 N. H. 219 
(32 Am. Dec. 350). 

Inpiea, Hill v, Saunders. 4 B. & C. 533. 

DEMOUBH. Reg. v, Howell, 9 C. & P. 437 ; Reg. v, Harris, Car. & M. 661 . 

DEMONSTRATIVE. legaoy. Armstrong's Appeal, 63 Pa. St. 312. 

DEICURBAGE. Cross v. Beard, 26 N. Y. 85 ; Donaldson v. McDowell, i Holmes, 

290. 

DEMXTBRER. Ex parte Vermilyea, 6 Cow. 555. 

^ parol . Oppenheimer v. Grieves, 7 Hurl. & N. 537. 

DENT. In statute, Watson v, Hawkins, 60 Mo. 553. 

the ezistenoe of God. In statute. Com . v, Kneeland, 20 Pick. 

206. 

DEPART. from. In statute. Blodgett v. Utley, 4 Neb. 25. 

from and reside out of. In statute, Venuci v, Cademartori, 

59 Mo. 353 ; Garth v. Robards, 20 Mo. 523. 

from the port. In statute. Young 7/. The Orpheus, 119 Mass. 

179; The Active v, U. S., 7 Cranch, 109; i Paine, 247. . 

the realm. In statute, Williams t/. Nunn, i Camp. 154. 

this lifb without lawAil iaaue. In will, Anderson v. Jackson. 

16 Johns. 382 (8 Am. Dec. 330). 

tbia lifSd without leaving iaaoe. In will, Besant v. Cox. 6 Ch. 



Div. 604. 

DEPARTURE. The John Farron, 14 Blatchf. 24 ; McAvoy v, Wright, 25 Ind. 22 : 

Kimberlin v, Caiter, 49 Ind. 11 1 ; Aliens/. Watson, 16 Johns. 265; 
White V, Joy, 13 N. Y. 83. 

DEPENDBNC7. In statute. Com. v. EsUbrook, 10 Pick. 293 ; GofT v. Fowler. 3 

Pick. 300. 

DEPENDING, snit shall be . In statute, Wilson v. Hood, 3 H. &. C. 148. 

DEPONENT. Bliss v. Sherman, 47 Me. 248. 

Foster?/. Essex Bk.. 17 Mass. 479; Williams v. Laudry, 18 La. Ann. 
208; Lilly V, Comm'rs, 69 N. C. 300 ; Ruffin v, Comm'rs, 69 N. C. 
498, Catlin V, Savings Bk., 7 Conn. 487; Bloodworth v, Jacobs. 2 
La. Ann. 25 ; Montgomery v, Evans, 8 Ga. 178. 

In statute, Toler v. White, Ware. 280. 

irregular . Durnford v, Segher, 9 Mart (La.) 484 ; State v, Clark. 

4 Ind. 315. 

on . In statute, Ruffin v, Comm's, 69 N. C. 498. 

the same in the poat-ofELoe. In statute. Stanton v, Cline. 1 1 



N. Y. 196, 

DEPOSITION. Stimpson v. Books, 3 Blatchf. 456. 

In statute. Queen v, Fletcher, L. R., i C. C. R. 320 ; State v, Dayton, 
3 Zab. 49^ I 

Pittsburg, etc., R. Co. v, Chicago, etc., R. Co., 24 Ohk> St. 219. 

In bill of lading^. Maghee v, Camden, etc., R. Co., 45 N. Y. 514. 



DEPOT. 



102 



DESCRIPTION. 



jyEPOT — Continued. 



— groundfl. Blair v. Milwaukee, etc., R. Co., 20 Wis. 357 ; Fowler 
V. Farmers* Loan Co., 21 Wis. 78. 

or station. In statute. SUte v. New Haven, etc.. R. Co., 37 



DEPUTY. 



DJUUJULICT. 



Conn. 153. 

posts and stations. In contract, CaldwelPs case, 19 Wall. 264. 

DEPRECIATED. onrrenoy. In statute, De Forest v, Redfield, 4 Blatchf. 483. 

In constitution. Grant v. Courter, 24 Barb. 232. 

In statute. Braybrooke v. Att'y-Gen., 9 H. L. Cas. 150. 

of the proyision made for her by will, or otherwise in lieu 

of dower. In statute. Thompson v. McGraw, i Mete. 73. 

In statute. Rogers v. Jones, 7 B. & C. 88 ; Hughes v. Jones, i B. & 
Ad 388. 

dlerk. In statute. Willamette Co. v. Gordon, 6 Oregoe, 175. 

sheriff. Allen v. Smith, 12 N.J. (L.) 162; Tillotson v. Cheet- 

ham, 2 Johns. 63. 

to congress. In Indian treaty. Cherokee Nation v. SUte, 5 

Peters, i. 

The Island City, i Black, 121 ; TheGeoige Nicholaus, i Newb. 449; 
The Charles, i Newb. 329 ; The Leathers, i Newb. 421. 

In statute. Legge v. Boyd, i C. B. 93. 

and abandoned. Wyman v. Hurlburt, i Ohio, 81. 

title. Att'y-Gen. v. Rushton, 2 H. & C. 820. 

In will. Fleming v. Fleming, i H. & C. 244; Dove v. Torr, 128 
Mass. 38. 

to his ohildren. In will. Leavitt v. Logan, 3 Wall. Jr., 184. 

DESCENDANTS. Jewell v. Jewell, 28 Cal. 232. 

In statute. Van Beuren v. Dash, 30 N. Y. 393 ; Bryan v. Walton, 20 
Ga. 480 ; Walker v. Walker, 25 Ga. 420 ; Daboll v. Field, 9 R. I. 
266. 

In will. Ralph v. Carrick, 11 Ch. Div. 873 ; 5 Ch. Div. 989; Crosby t^. 
Clark, I Amb. 396 ; Baker v. Baker, 8 Gray, loi ; Barstow v. Good- 
win, 2 Bradf. 413: Armstrong v. Moran, i Bradf. 314; Hamhn v. 
Osgood, I Redf. 409. 

DESCENT. Bickley v. Bickley, L. R., 4 Eq. Cas. 216. 

gift or devise ftom the parent or other kindred* In statute. 

Gardner v. Collins, 2 Peters, 58. 

collateral . Levy v. McArtee, 6 Pet. 102. 

immediate . Levy v. McArtee, 6 Pet. 102. 

lineal . Levy v. McArtee, 6 Pet. 102. 

mediate . Levy v. McArtee, 6 Pet. 102. 



DESCEND. 



DESCRIBED. 



in and conveyed by. In deed. Railroad Co. v. Beal, 47 Cal. 



151. 



DESCBIFXION. In contract. Simond v. Braddon, 2 C. B. (N. S.) 525. 

In statute. Queen v. Tugwell, L. R. 3 Q. B. 704 ; 9 B. & S. 383. 
limit the of his workmen. In statute. Skinner v. Ketch, 



L. R., 2 Q. B. 395. 

true . In statute. DeWitt v. Smith, 63 Mo. 263 ; Mechanics' 

Planing Mill v. Nast, 7 Mo. (A pp.) 14.Q. 



DESERT. XO3 DESTRUCTIVE. 

DESEBT. willfully • In statuU, McCormack v, McCormack, 19 Wis. 172. 

DESERTED. utterly . In statute. Pid^ v. Pidge, 3 Mete. 259. 

DESERTER. In slander. Hollingsworth v. Shaw, 19 Ohio St. 430 (2 Am. Rep. 411). 

DESERTION. Meldowney v. Meldowney, 12 C. E. Green, 328 ; Benkert v. Benkert, 

32 Cal. 467 ; Orr v. Orr, 8 Bush, 1 56 ; Kestler v. Kestler, 4 Stew. 
Ch. 197 ; Thorpe v. Thorpe, 9 R. I. 57 ; Bailey v. Bailey, 21 Gratt. 
43 ; Steele v. Steele, i McArthur, 505 ; Bennetts. Bennett, 43 Conn. 
315 ; Cloutman v. Tunison, Sumn. 373; Coffin v, Jenkins, 3 Story, 
108; Harrison v. South Scituate, 115 Mass 336. 

In statute. Queen v. Guardians, 5 Q. B. Div. 31 ; Edward v. Trevel- 
lick, 4 Eh &. Bl. 68 ; Southwick v. Southwick, 97 Mass. 328 ; Magrath 
V. Magrath, 103 Mass. 577; Lea v. Lea, 8 Allen, 418; Stoddard v, 
Stoddard, 11 Chicago L. M. 162. 

DESIGN. McKee v. Holdsworth, L. R., i Q. B. 264. 

In indictment. Com. v. Morse, 2 Mass. 128. 

In statute. Clark v. Bonsfield, 10 Wall. 133; Binns v. Woodruff, 4 
Wash. C. C. 48. 

Ibr the shape or conflguration of an article of merchaadise. 

In statute. Milligen v. Picken, i C. R 800. 

in the assured. In insurance policy. Catlin v. Springfield Ins. 

Co.. I Sumn. 435. 

or negleot. In statute. Knowlton v. Prov. S. Co., 53 N. Y. 76. 



DESIGNATE. In statute. Re Election of Prothonotary, i Pa. L. J. Rep. 484. 

DESIGNATED. In statute. SUte v. Green, 3 Harr. 197. 

DESIGNED. Ibr exportation. In statute. Com. v. King, i Whart. 448. 

or intended Ibr the prevention of oonoeption. In statute. 

U. S. V. Bott, 1 1 Blatchf. 347. 

to distinguish suoh ballot. In statute. Wynan v. Lemon, $1 

Cal. 274I 

DESIGNEDLY. In indictment. State v. Bradley, 68 Mo. 140. 

and tinlawfidly. In indictpnent. Com. v, Hulbert, 12 Met. 448. 



In will. Cockrell v. Armstrong, 31 Ark. 589; Van Dyck v. Van 
Beuren, i Caines, 84. 

my being. In will. Stead v. Mellor, 5 Ch. Div. 225. 

DESPATCH. all possible^— .In contract. Lowber v. Bangs, 2 Wall. 728 ; Rowan 

V. Sharp's Rifle Manuf. Co., 33 Conn. 2; Moody v. Five Hundred 
Thousand Laths, 2 Fed. Rep. 607. 

DESPATCHED. In charter party. Sharp v. Gibbs, i Hurl. & N. 808. 

DESTINATION, place of . In statute. Sheridan v. Ireland. 66 Me. 65. 

XK>rt of • U. S. z'. Barker, $ Mass. 404. 

DESTITUTE. seamen. In statute. Matthews z/. Offey. i Sumner, 121. 

DESTBOY. In indictment. Tully v. People, 67 N. Y. 15. 

In statute. U. S. v. Johns, 4 Dall. 412 ; Com. v. Sullivan, 107 Mass. 

218; Rex V. MacKerell, 4 C. & P. 448; Rex v. Fidler, 4 C. & P. 

449; Rex «'• Mead, 4 C. & P. 535. 

any vessel. In statute. U. S. v. Johns, i Wash. C. C. 363. 

out down OP any trees. In statute. Rex v. Taylor, Russ. & 

Ry- 373. 

DESTBOYED. In statute. Johnson v. Brailford. 2 N. & Mc. 272 (10 Am. Dec. 601). 
DESTBTTCTIVE. matter. In statute. Rex v. Crawford. 2 C. A K. 129. 



DETACHED. 



X04 



DICTUM. 



DETAGKBD. In statute. Reg. v. Brecon, 15 Q. B. 816. 

this oheok Ibrlbited if . In railway ticket. Hamilton v. N. T. 

C. R. R.. 51 N. Y. 100. 

DETAINED. In statute. Sedgwick v. Knibloe, 16 Conn. 222. 

DETAINMENTS. of piinoM. In ins. policy. Richardson v. Marine Ins. Co., 

6 Mass. 102. 
DETAINS. In plea. ClemenU v. Plight, 16 M. & W. 42. 

DITTENTION. In insurance policy, Archibald v. Mercantile Ins. Co., 3 Pick. 74. 

by ioe. In charter party. Hudson v. Ede, 8 B. & S. 631. 

DETEBMINABIiK on a six month's notioe. In lease. Jones v. Nixon, i H. 

& C. 48. 

DETERMINATION. of the action. In statute. Burnaby v. Earle, L. R., 9 Q. 

B. 490. 

or direction of the judge in point of law. In statute. Tern- 

pieman v. Haydon, 12 C. B. 512. 
the action. In statute. Western Bk. v. Tallman, 15 Wis. 92. 



DEVICE. 



DETEBMINE. — 

DEVIATION. Riggin v. Patapsco Ins. Co., 7 H. & J. 279 (16 Am. Dec. 302); Clark 

V. U. S., 7 Mass. 365 ; Reade v. Com. Ins. Co., 3 Johns. 252 (3 Am. 
Dec. 495); Patapsco Ins. Co. v. Coulter, 3 Peters, 222 ; Coffin v, 
Newbury Ins. Co., 9 Mass. 436 ; Warder v. La Belle Creole, i Pet. 
Adm. 31 ; Haven v. Holland, 2 Mason, 230. • 

In insurance policy. Hammond v. Reid, 4 B. & Aid. 73 ; Solly v. 
Whitmore, $ B. & Aid. 46; Hanover v. Hutchinson, 10 R & S. 471. 

In statute. Doe v. R. Co., 16 Q. B. 537. 

In statute. Williams t/. Starr, 5 Wis. 549; Henderson v. State, 59 Ala. 
91 ; Smith v. State, 17 Tex. 191 ; Moorman v. Hoge, 2 Sawyer, 86. 

of like kind. In statute. Chavannah v. State, 49 Ala. 396. 

any or Bubstitute Ibr cards or dice. In statute. Bryan v. 

State, 26 Ala. 65 ; Windham v. State, 26 Ala. 69. 

distinctive •: mark or heading* In statute. Re Stephens, 3 Ch. 

Div. 659. 

other . In statute. U. S. v. Speeden, i Cranch C. C. 535. 

In statute. Freme v. Clement, 30 W. R. i ; Swinton v. Bailey, 4 App. 
Cas. 70. 

In will. Ladd v. Harvey, 21 N. H. 514; McCorkle v. Sherrill, 6 Ired. 
(Eq.) 173 ; Dickerman v. Abrahams, 21 Barb. 551. 

DEVISED. In power of sale. Provost v. Provost, 12 C. E. Green, 296. 

DEVOLUTION. In statute. Att'y-^^i^* ^* Middleton, 3 Hurl. & N. 136. 

DEVOLVE. In will. Fazakerly z/. Ford, i Ad. & Ell. 897; Parr v. Parr, i Mylne 

& K. 647. 

axK>n. In patent. Cope v. Earl de la Warr, L. R., 8 Ch. App. 

982. 

DICTA. Rohrback v. Germania Ins. Co., 62 N. Y. 47. 

obiter • Rohrback v. Germania Ins. Co., 62 N. Y. 47. 

In statute. Hamilton v. Hamilton, 6 '^Mart. (N. S.) 143; Prendeigast 
V. Prendergast, 16 La. Ann. 219. 

Clark V. Thomas, 4 Heisk. 419. 



DIC7FATB. 



jyicruNL. 



DIE. 105 DIRECT. 



by his own haad. In policy of insurance, Terry v, Ins. Co., i 

Dill. 403; Insurance.Co. v, Rodel. 5 Otto. 232 ; Breasted z/. Farmers 
L. & T. Co.. 8 N. Y. 317 , Ins. Co. v, Terry. 15 Wall. 580; Cooper v, 
Mass. Ins. Co.. 102 Mass. 239. Equitable Life Ins. Co. v, Paterson. 
41 Ga. 338 (5 Am. Rep. 535); Van Zandt v. Mutual Benefit Ins. Co... 
55 N. Y. 169 (14 Am. Rep. 215); Phillips v, Louisiana, etc.. Ins. Co... 
26 La. Ann. 404 (31 Am. Rep. 549): Waller v, Connecticut Mut. Ins. 
Co.. 2 Fed. Rep. 892 ; Dormay v, Borradaile, 5 C. B. 392. 

by suicide. In insurance policy. Cooper %*, Mass. Ins. Co.. 102 

Mass. 227 ; Phadenhaur %k Germania Ins. Co., 7 Heisk. 567 (19 Ann 

Rep. 623). 

in the known violation of any law. In insurance policy. 

Bradley v. Mut. Life Ins. Co.. 45 N. Y. 423. 

in violation of law. In insurance policy, Wolff v, Connecticut 

Ins. Co., S Mo. A pp. 239. 

leaving issue. In will, Phelps v, Robbins, 40 Conn. 251. 

^«- without children. In will, Morgan v, Morgan, 5 Day, 517. 

without heirs. In deed, Wilson v, Cockrell, 8 Mo. 9, and.cases 

cited. 

— without issue. In will, Ricketts v. Carpenter. 7 H. L. Cas. 68 ; 
Everst/. Challis, 7 H L. Cas. 531 ; Cachus' Appeal. 91 Pa. St. 10$; 
Gee V. Mayor, 17 Q. B. 737 , Doe v, Owens, i B. & Ad. 319 ; Chism v. 
Williams. 29 Mo. 288, Faust v, Birner. 30 Mo. 414: Lewis v, Clai- 
borne. 5 Yerg. 369 (26 Am. Dec. 270). 

without issue of their bodies. In will, Foster v, Hayes. 2 

El. & Bl. 30. 

without leaving Issue. In will. Re Walker, 12 Ch. Div. 205 ; 

White V, Hight, 12 Ch. Div. 751. 

should any of my ohildren . In will. Li vi ngston v, Greene. 52 

N.Y.I 18. 

leaving issue. In will, Jordan v. Roach. 32 Miss. 482. 

non jundious. State v, Ricketts, 74 N. C. 187. 

DIFFERENCE. In statute. Shepherd v, Londonderry. 18 Q. B. 14$. 

DIQOINQ. gold. In statute, Hoyt v. Smith. 27 Conn. 63. 

ezeouting the • In contract, Sherman v. Mayor of New York> 

I N. Y. 316. 

DUiIGENCE. due . Rhodes v, Seymour. 36 Conn. i. 

DIUGENT. inquiry. Marsh v. Barr. Meigs. 70. 

DIOCESE. In statute. Reg. v. Archbishop of Canterbury, 6 El. & Bl. 564. 

In charter party. The On rust, 5 Blatchf. 533. 

and regulate. In statute. King v, Rawlinson. 6 B. & C. 23. 

interest. Lewis v. Post, i Ala. 65. 

payment of money. In statute, Hathaway v, Davis, 33 CaK 

]6i. 

tax. In constitution, Clark v, Sickel. 14 Int. Rev. Rec. 6; 

Veazie Bk. v, Fenno, 8 Wall. 533 ; Pacific Ins. Co. v. Soule.7 Wall. 
433 i Scholey v, Rew. 23 Wall. 331 ; Springer z/. U. S., 12 Otto, 595: 
Hylton V. U. S., 3 Dallas. 171. 

as the master may — -. In contract. Wood v. The Nimrod, Gilp. 85. 

shall proeeed . in charter party. The Onnist, 6 Blatchf. 533. 

14 



i)i>ii 



niKEClED. X06 DISCONTINUANCE, 



DIBEGTED. duly • In statute. Birch v. Edwards, s C. B. 5a 

DIBECTION. Summons z/. Sisson, 26 N. Y. 264. 

in writing. In statute. Queen v. Christian, L. R., 2 C. C. R. 

lOI. 

acting under the of. In statute, Newton v, Ellis, 5 El. & 81. 

115. 

under their • In agreement, Berkshire Woolen Co. v. Day, 12 

Cush. 130. 

DIBSCTLY. Tuff z/. Warman, 5 C. B. (N. S.) 585 ; Button v. R. Co^ 18 N. Y. 248 . 

Johnson v. R Co., 20 N. Y. 74. 

In contract, Dnncan v, Topham, 8 C. B. 235. 

DIBECrFOB. provisional . Burndge v. Morris. 3 H. & C. 668. 

DIBECTOBS. eight of which shall be practical medhanice. In statute. 

Gray v. Directors, 2 Cranch C. C. 51. 

the . In statute, Southampton Dock Co. v, Richards, i Man. & 

G. 448. 

the court of • In statute, Southampton Dock Co. v, Richards. 

I Man. & G. 448. 

DISABILITY. Beaven v, Mornington, 8 H. L. Cas. 525 ; People v. Supervisors, 32 

Barb. 473 : Meeks v, Vassault, 3 Sawyer. 266. 

In statute, Valle v, Obenhause. 63 Mo. 81. 

death or . In statute. State v, Newark. 27 N. J. (L.) 135. 

legal . In statute, Bauman v, Grubbs, 26 Ind. 419. 

legal to sue. In statute, Meeks v, Vassault, 3 Sawyer, 21 2. 

DISABLE. In statute, Tully v. People, 67 N. Y. is ; U. S. v, Askins. 4 Cranch C. 

C. 98. 

wholly to him from following his usual business. In insure 

ance policy. Hooper t^. Accidental Death Ins. Co., 5 Hurl. & N 548. 

DISABLING. In statute, SUte v, Briley. 8 Port. 473. 

In plea, Tate v, Hutchins. 7 C. B. 875. 

In statute. Case v. Price, 9 Abb. Pr. 11; Wright v. Wilkerson, 41 
Ala. 267. 

In charter party. Certain Logs of Mahogany. 2 Sumn. 589; Kimball 
V, The Anna Kimball, 2 Cliff. 4. 

In plea. Cort v. R. Co., 17 Q. B. 142 ; Kemp v. Watt. 15 M. & W. 673. 

In statute. Ex parte Paris, 3 Woodb. & M. 237. 

for money. In statute. Com. v, Talbot. 2 Allen. 161. 

attempt to any kind of loaded arms at any person. In siat^ 

ute. Rex v, Mountford. 7 C. & P. 243. 

DISCHARGED. In statute. Loring v, Allene, 9 Cush. 68 ; State v, Garthwaite. 23 N. 

J. (L.) 143. 
rule In statute, Abbott v. Feary. 6 Hun. & N. 1 15. 

DISCLAJMEB. Jackson v. Richards. 6 Cow. 616; Watson v, Watson, 13 Conn. 83 ; 

Doe V, Stanion. 1 M. & W. 703. 

DISCLOSE. In statute, Whiley v. Whiley, 4 C. B. (N. S.) 660. 

DISCONnNUANCE. Ex parte Drover. 51 Ala. 41 . Russell v, Rolfe. 50 Ala. 56; ex 

parte Hall. 47 Ala. 675 ; Davidson v, Weems. 58 Ala. 187 ; Germania 

Fire Ins. Co. v. Francis. 52 Miss. 457. 

In statute. Thurman v, James.* 48 Mo. 235 ; Reesede v, U. S., 8 Wall. 38. 
of possession. In statute. Leigh ta Jack. 5 Ex. Div. 265. 



DI SCON TIN UED. 



107 



DISPOSING. 



DISOONTZNUSD. such posseflsion or receipt. In siatuU. Davy v. Oxen- 
ham, 7 M. & W. 134; Owen v. De Beauvoir. 16 M. & W. 564. 

BISOOUNT. Saltmarsh v. Planters, etc., Bk., 14 Ala. 668: Dunckle v. Renick. 6 

Ohio St 527; Philadelphia Loan Co. v. Towner, 13 Conn. 248; 
Tracy v, Tallmadge, 18 Barb. 456; Farmers, etc., Bk. v, Baldwin, 23 
Minn. 198; Niagara Co. Bk. z/. Baker, 15 Ohio St. 87; Flecknerz/. 
Bank of U. S., 8 Wheat. 338. 

Jn statute. State z/. Boatman*s Savings Inst, 48 Mo. 189; People v. 
Metropolitan Bk., 7 How. Pr. 144; Ferguson v. Hill, 3 Stew. 485 ; 
Bank v, Mandeville, i Cranch C. C. 552. 

DISOOVEBY. Johnson v. Mcintosh, 8 Wheat. 545. 

DISCRETION. Rex v. Wilkes. 4 Burr. 2539, Judges v. Peot)le, 18 Wend. 79: Camp- 
bell V, Upton, 113 Mass. 67; Piatt v, Monroe, 34 Barb. 291 ; Sey- 
mour t/. Delancy, 3 Cow. 44s (14 Am. Dec. 270), Abbott v, L'Hom- 

medieu, 10 W. Va. 677 ; Rose v. Brown, 11 W. Va. 122. 

DISEASE. — of the liver. Cushman v. U. S. Life Ins. Co.. 70 N. Y. 72. 

firee from any symptoms of • In life insurance application, 

Swick V, Home Ins. Co., 2 Dill. 160. 

DISFIQURINQ. In statute. State v. Smith, Cheves, 157 ; State v. Harris, 11 Iowa, 

4i4. 

DISGRACEFUL. conduct. In libel. Moore v. Terrill, 4 B. & Adol. 870. 

DISQUISE. person in . In statute. Dale Co. v. Gunther. 46 Ala. 118. 

DISHONORED. Shelton v. Braithwaite, 7 M. & W. 436. 
DISINTERESTED. Lovering v. Lamson, 50 Me. 334. 

In insurance policy. iEtna Ins. Co. v Stevens, 48 III. 31. 

of action. Lese v. Sherwood, 21 Cal. 151. 



DISMISSAL. 
DISMISSED. 



In bond. Bosley v. Bruner, 24 Miss. 457. 

In docket entry. Gove 7/. Lyford, 44 N. H. 525. 

agreed. In court entry. Haldeman v. U. S.. I Otto, 584. 

Without prejudice. In court entry. Ray v. Alden, 50 N. H. 83. 

or resistance to any lawfid writ. In statute. Steam Stone 

Cutter Co. v. Windsor Manufg. Co., 3 Fed. Rep. 300. 

or circumstances tending to shorten lifb. In insurance policy. 



l>lSPATCa. 

DISPENSE. 

DISPLACE. 

DISPLACED. 

DISPOSAL. 



Jones V. Ins. Co., 3 C. B, (N. S.) 84. 
In charter party. Sleeper v. Ping. 17 Blatchf.40. 
In statute. Apothecaries Co. v. Greenough. i Q. R 798. 
In contract. Potter v. Smith, 103 Mass. 68. 
In contract. Sterling v. MaiUand, $ B. & S. 850. 

at her . In ante-nuptial agreement. Agee v. Agee, 22 Mo. 367. 

of. In constitution. U. S. v. Gratiot, 14 Peters, 526. 



DISPOSIKG-. 



In statute. Fling v. Goodall, 40 N. H. 219; Rogers v. Goodwin, a 

Mass. 427; Beard v. Knox. 5 Cal. 256. 

of certificates. In statute. Boyd v. Stote. 61 Ala. 197. 

of said premises. In lease. Elston v. Schilling, 42 N. Y. 79. 

In will. Stevenson v. Glover, i C. B. 460. 

of In order. Taylor v. Carr. 2 B. & S. 338. 

In statute. Bullene v. Smith. 73 Mo. 151. 

and putting away. In statute. Rex v. Cushlan, i Jebb. 20; 

Rex V. Palmer, 1 Russ. & Ry. 72. 



DISPOSITION. xo8 DISTRICT. 

DISPOSITION. In statute, Crocker v, Waine. 5 B. & S. 715 ; Atty.-Gen. v. Middle- 
ton, 3 Hurl. & N. 136. 

DISFBOFOBTIONATE. and unreasonable. In statute, Dow v. Wakefield, 

103 Mass. 272. 

DISPUTE. In statute, Clemson v, Hubbard, i Ex. Div. 179. 

DISQUALIFIED. In statute. Nicholson v. Fields, 7 H. & N. 811. 

otherwise to sit. In statute, Peyton's Appeal, 12 Kas. 398. 

DISSEIZIN. Sumner v, Stevens, 6 Mete. 337; Clap v, Bromagham, 9 Cow. 530; 

Bates V, Norcross, 14 Pick. 224; Slater v, Raulson, 6 Mete. 439; 
Doe V, Thompson, 5 Cow. 371. 

In statute, McCartney v, Alderson, 45 Mo. 35 ; Tilton v. Hunter. 24 
Me. 29. 

by election. Varick u, Jackson, 2 Wend. 166 (19 Am. Dec. 571). 

by relation. Varick v, Jackson. 2 Wend. 166 (19 Am. Dec. 571). 

in flu^. Varick v, Jackson, 2 Wend. 166 (19 Am. Dec. 571). 

DISSOLUTION. Mayor v, Seaber, 3 Burr. 1866 ; Commercial Bk. v, Lockwood. 2 

Harr. (Del.) 8. 

In statute. State Savings Inst. v. Kellogg, 52 Mo. 589. 

DISSOLVED. Slee v. Bloom, 19 Johns. 456(10 Am. Dec. 456); re Independent Ins. 

Co., I Holmes, 104; Mayor v, Seaber, 3 Burr. 1866; Commercial 
Bk. V, Lockwood. 3 Harr. (Del.) 8. 

DISTANCE. Lake v, Butler, 5 El. & Bl. 92 ; Jewell v. Stead, 6 El. & Bl. 359; Smith 

V, Ingraham, 9 Cow. 419. 

within the of half a mile. In deed, Monflet v. Cole, L. R.. 8 

Ex. 32. 

DISTILLED. U. S. v, Tenbrook, Pet. C. C. 180. 

spirits. In statute, U. S. v, Anthony, 14 Blatchf. 92 ; Boyd v, 

U. S.. 14 Blatchf. 317. 

DISTILLER. In statute, U. S. v. Tenbrook. Pet. C. C, 180; U. S. v. Frerichs. 16 

Blatchf. 547. 

DISTILLERY. In deed, Atlantic Dock Co. v, Leavit, 54 N. Y. 35 ; Atlantic Dock 

Co. V, Libby. 45 N. Y. 499. 

the . In statute, U. S. v. Distillery, 1 1 Blatchf. 255. 

DISTINCT. In statute, Demar v, Swabey, 1 1 Ad. & Ell. 913. 

DISTINCTLY. and definitely specified. In statute. Bird v. Daggett, 97 

Mass. 494* 
DISTRAIN. Boyd v, Howden. 3 Daly. 455. 
DISTRIBUTE. In statute, Grider v, McClay. 1 1 S. & R. 232. 
DISTRIBUTED. In will, Chighizola v, Le Baron, 21 Ala. 406. 

DISTRIBUTEE. In statute, Boyd v. Small, 4 Jones (Eq.), 39: Henry v, Henry, 9 Ired. 

(L.) 278. 

DISTRIBUTION. of awards. In statute, Boyd v. State, 61 Ala. 197. 

DISTRIBUTIVE. share. In statute. Page v. Rives, 2 Hughes, 305. 

DISTRICT. In statute. McCaulay v, Fulton, 44 Cal. 356 ; Blackpool Local Bd. 

V, Bermett, 4 Hurl. & N. 128; Same v, Kenyon, 4 Hurl. & N. 133; 
Ticknor v. McClelland, 84 111. 471 ; Kelly v, Sanders, 9 Otto, 441 . 
Dorling v. Board of Health, 5 El. & Bl. 472 ; Ayer v. Thacher» 3 
Mason, 153. 

court. In mandate, Irvine v, Marshall, 3 Minn. 72. 

of Alaska. In statute. The Louisa Simpson, 2 Sawyer, 57. 



DISTRICTED. 



Z09 



DOCUMENTAR Y. 



DISTBICTED. 
DISTUBB. 



- anew. In statute. Bacon v. School District, 97 Mass. 421. 

the peaoe. In city ordinance. City v. Mayor, 58 Mo. 86. 

molest or . In indictment. State z/. Oskins, 28 Ind. 364; Mar* 

vin V, State, 19 Ind. 181. 

DISTUBBANGB. of divers oitixens. In indictment. Com. v. Smith, 6 jf ush. 81. 

of others. In statute, George v. George, 47 N. H. 27 ; Smith v, 

Foster, 41 N. H. 221. 

religiotis worship. In statute. Brown v. State, 46 Ala. 175; 



BISTUBBHIp. 



DITTO. 
DIVIDB. 



DIVIDED. 



DIVJDKND. 



DIVIDENDS. 



DIVINE. 



State V, Hinson, 31 Ark. 642 ; Wall v, Lee, 34 N. Y. 141 ; Harrison 
V, State, I Ala. Sel. Cas. 61 ; Cockerham v. State, 7 Humph. 1 1 ; 
Owen V. Henman, i W. & S. 548 , Lancaster v State, 53 Ala. 398. 

Pariente v, Luckett, 2 C. B. 180. 

any oause of action. In statute. Kimpton v, Willey, 9 C. B. 

728. 

the same equally. In will. Lord v, Moore, 20 Conn. 126. 

equally. In will, Purnell v, Culbertson, 12 Bush, 369. 

or otherwise. In statute. Collector v, Hubbard, 12 Wall. i. 

parish. In statute, Roberts v, Aulton, 2 Hurl. & N. 439. 

to be equally between them. In will. Mackie v. Story, 3 

Otto, 589; Purnell v, Culbertson, 12 Bush. 369. 

Hall V, Kellogg. 12 N. Y. 325; Williston v. Michigan, etc., R. Co., 13 
Allen, 400; Lockhart v. Van Alstyne, 31 Mich. 76; TafTt v. Hart- 
ford, etc., R. Co., 8 R. L 310; Osgood v, Laytin, 3 Abb. App. Dec. 
418. 

Hyatt V. Alien, 56 N. Y. 553, San Francisco, etc., Society v, Cary, 2 
Sawyer, 336. 

In statute, Chicago, etc., R. Co. v. Page, 2 Biss. 463; re Griffith, 12 
Ch. Div. 655; re Cox, 9 Ch. Div. 159; Cary v. Savings Union, 22 
Wall. 39. 

punishment. Thurston v, Whitney, 2 Cush. 60. 

service. Gass' Appeal, 73 Pa. St. 39. 

service, rite or oi&ce. In statute, Copp v. Barber, L. R., 7 C. 

P. 393. 
worship. Gass' Appeal, 73 Pa. St. 39. 



BrVTSIOKAL. 
IX>. 



DiVusiOK. In contract. Nelson v. Benson, 69 111. 27. 

In statute. King v. Justices, i B. ^ Aid, 590. 

before the of the estate. In will, Collison v, Collison, 12 Ch. 

Div. 835. 

court. In statute, Fisher v. Asphalte Co., i C. P. Div. 259. 

abide and perform. In bond. He wins v. Currier, 62 Me. 236. 

to as she sees proper before her death. In will. Brant v, 

Virginia Coal Co., 3 Otto, 333. 

Stevenson v, Weisser, 1 Bradf. 343 ; Harrison v. Southern Manfg. Co.. 
10 S. C. 278. 

Lipscomb v. Holmes, 2 Camp. 441. 

doctor's certificate. In statute, Corsi v. Maretzek, 4 E. D. Smith, i. 

DOCUMENTS. In rule 0/ court. Hazard v, Durant, 12 R. I. 99. 

DOCUMENTABY. legal evidence. In statute, Sparrenberger v. State, 53 

Ala. 481. 



DOCTOK. 



DOG. 



XIO 



DONA TION. 



BOO. 
DOOS. 

Donroi 

BOINGHS. 
DOLLAR 

DOLLAB8. 



DOMB8TIC. 



DomciL. 



DONATE. 
DONATIO. 



keep or use any • In statute, Haywardt/. Homerp 5 B. & Aid. 319. 

setting . In statute. Briarley z/. Athorpe» 5 B. & Aid. 320. 

other to kill hares. In statute. Grant v, Hulton, i E A Aid. 

136. 

« 

busineM in the State. In statute, Erie R. R. v. Pennsylvania, 

21 Wall. 492. 

In statute. First Nat. Bk. of Davenport v, Davies, 43 la. 424. 

In indictment. Com. v. Steams, 10 Mete. 259. • 

parts of a . U. S. v, Gardner, 10 Peters. 618. 

Bank v. Supervisors, 7 Wall. 26; Bronson v. Rodes, 7 Wall. 229; 
ThorinRton v. Smith, 8 Wall, i ; Confederate Note Case, 19 Wall. 
548 ; Hunt V, Smith, 9 Kas. 137 , Roane v. Wilson, 34 Ark. 213; Ses- 
sions z/. Play, 21 Ark. 100; Cooke v, Lillo, 13 Otto, 792. 

In indictment. Barton v, Steele, 29 Ark. 68. 

In note. Riddle v. Hill, 51 Ala. 225 ; Hightower v, Maull, 50 Ala. 495; 
Lang V, Waters, 47 Ala. 625; Homes v, Austin, 35 111. 396; Law- 
rence V, Schmidt, 3$ 111. 440, Miller v. Lacy, 33 Tex. 351 ; Stough- 
ton V, Hill, 3 Woods, 404. 

In wilt, Halstead v, Meeket, 18 N. J. (Eq.) 136. 

in gold and silver. In note. Hart v, Flynn, 8 Dana, 190. 

Spanish • In indictment. Fight v. State, 7 Ohio, 180 (28 Am. 

Dec. 626). 

twenty-five . In contract, Trecartin v. The Rochambeau, 2 

Cliff. 465. 

animals. In statute, Osborn v, Lenox, 2 Allen, 209. 

manufbotnres. In statute, ^ Com. v. Giltman, 64 Penn. St. 100. 

servants. Ex patte Meason, 5 Binney, 167 , Nickoll v. Graves, 

17 C. B. (N. S.) 29; Nowlen v, Abbott, 2 Cromp. M. & R. 54, Todd 
V, Kenrick, 8 Ex. 151 ; Johnson v, Blenkensopp, 5 Jur. 870. 

In statute, Morehouse v. Dodge, 6 La. Ann. 276 ^ Richardson v. 
State, 43 Tex. 456. 

water fbr use. In statute. Busby v, Chesterfield Water Wks. 

I El. Bl. & El. 178. 

Cockrell v, Cockrell, 25 L. J. (Ch.) 730 ; Whicker v, Hume, 7 H. L. 
Cas. 164; Lord v, Colvin, 4 Drew. 366^ Rue v. Hight, 2 Doug. 
(Mich.) 523 i Chaine v, Wilson, i Bosw. 673 ; White v. Brown, i 
Wall. Jr. 217 ; re Thompson, i Wend. 43, re Wrigley, 8 Wend. 142 , 
Guier v, Daniel, i Binney, 349; Putnam v, Johnson, 10 Mass. 488. 
Carey's Appeal, 75 Penn. St. ^01 ; ex parte Barton, 39 Ala. 452 ; 
Hanston v, Hanston, 27 Miss. 704: Mitchell v, U. S., 21 Wall. 350; 
Woodworth v. Bank, 19 Johns. 392 , Martin v. Kessinger, 26 La. 
Ann. 338 ; The Venus, 8 Cranch, 253 ; re Capdevielle, 2 H. & C. 
1015; Atty.-Gen. v Countess of Wahlstatt, 3 H. & C. 388; Savage 
V, Scott, 45 Iowa, 130; Morgan v, Numes, 54 Miss. 308. 

In statute. Charlton Co. v, Moberly, 59 Mo. 238 , Warren v, Thomas- 
ton, 43 Me. 406. 

of suooession. Smith v, Croom, 7 Fla. 81. 

Goodhue v. Town of Beloit, 21 Wis. 637. 

causa mortis. Cutting v. Silliman, 41 N. H. 147; White ik 



Wager, 52 Barb. 250 ; Kilby v, Godwin, 2 Del. Ch. 61. 
DONATION. In statute, Indiana, etc., R. Co. v. City of Attica, 56 Ind. 476. 



DONA TIONS. 



zzz 



DRUG. 



DOKATIOKS. 
DONE. 



reoeive 



In statute. Hooker t/. Wittenberg College, 2 Gin. 353. 



DOOB. 



DORMANT. 



DOTAGE. 



DOWBY. 



DBAFT. 



DRAIK. 

DBAM. 

DRAMATIC. 



Jn statute. JoUiffe v. Wallesley. L. R., 9 C. P. 62. 

any thing . In statute. Umphelby v. McLean, i B. & Aid. 43. 

thing duly . In statute. Queen v. Justies, i Q. B. Div. 221. 

at the court houae • In deed of trust. Hambright v. Brock- 
man, 59 Mo. 52. 

partner. North v. Bloss. 30 N. Y. 374, Mitchell v. Dall, 2 Hair. 



& G. 159; National Bk. v. Thomas, 47 N. Y. 15. 
Owing's case, i Bland Ch. 370 (17 Am. Dec. 311). 

State V. Jay. 31 Ark. 577 ; Dow v. Dow. 36 Me. 211. 

In statute. Re Davis, 36 Iowa, 24 ; Bryant v. McCune, 49 Mo. 88. 

In will. Adamson v. Ayres, 5 N. J. (Eq.) 349, Brackett v. Leighton, 7 

Me. 383. 

relinquiahea her • In married woman* s certificate in deed, De- 

lassus V. Poston, 19 Mo. 425 ; Perkins v. Carter, 20 Mo. 465. 

right, title and interest of in said estate. In deed. Mc Far- 
land V. Baze, 24 Mo. 156. 

In statute. Buard v. DeRussy,6 Rob. (La.) in ; Gates 7/. Legendre, 10 
Rob. (La.) 74 ; De Young v. De Young, 6 La. Ann. 786. 

Wildes V. Savage, i Story C. C. 22; Cole v. Dalton, 6 Daly, 484. 

In statute. Allen v. Savings Bk., 69 N. Y. 314; Oultard v. Savings 
Inst., i*7 Wall. 109; Napier v. Barney, 5 Blatchf. 191. 

for the payment of money. In statute. Rex v. Pooley, 3 B. & 

P. 3ir. 

Goldthwait v Inhabitants, 5 Gray, 61. 

Lacy V. State 32 Tex. 227. 

composition. In statute, Martmelli v Maguire, i Abb. (N. S.) 

356 ' Daly V. Palmer, 6 Blatchf. 264 ; Martinelli v. Maguire, i Deady, 
216. 

composition designed or suited for publio representation* 

In statute. Daly v. Palmer, 6 Blatchf. 263. 

entertainment. In statute. Day v. Simpson, 18 C. B. (N. S.) 

681. 

pieoe or entertainment. In statute. Russell v. Smith, 12 Q. 



DRAUOHT. 



DREDGING. 



B. 217 ; Lee v. Simpson, 3 C. B. 871. 
In statute. U. S. v. Bates, 2 Cranch C.C. i. 

DRAWBRIDGE. In contract. Railroad Co. v. Smith, 21 Wail. 262. 

DRAWN. in question. In statute. Bridge Proprietors v. Hoboken Co., 

I Wall. 1 16. 

In city ordinance, Snyder v. North Lawrence, 8 Kas. 82. 

In contract. Boynton v. Lynn Gas-Light Co., 124 Mass. 202. 

by the • In statute. Sappington v. Carter, 67 III. 482. 

cattle. In statute, Triggs v, Lester, L. R., i Q. B. 260. 

In statute. Isaac v. Third Ave. R. R., 47 N. Y. 122. 

feed sewing machines. In patent, Florence Sewing Mach. Co. 

V. Grover, etc., Co., 1 10 Mass. 70. 

In insurance policy. Moore v. Perpetual Ins. Co., 16 Mo. 98. 

Gault V, State, 34 Ga. 533. 



DROP. 

DROWNING. 
DRUG. 



DR UGGIST 1 12 D UB. 

DBUOQIBT. In statute. State v. Holmes, 28 La. Ann. 765; Hamline v. Cora. 13 

Bush, 350; Mills V, Perkins, 120 Mass. 41; Apothecaries Co. v, 
Greenough, i Q. B. 798. 

DBUGB* and medioines. In insurance policy. Colhns v, Farmville Ins. 

Co., 79 N. C. 279. 

DBUHHEB. Singleton v. Fritsch, 4 Lea, 93. 

DBUNKABD. Com. v, Whitney, 5 Gray, 85 ; 1 1 Cush. 477. 

common . Com. v, McNamee» 112 Mass. 285. 

habitual . Magahay t/. Magahay, 35 Mich. 210 ; Com. v. Whitney, 

5 Gray, 85. 

DBUNEIEKNESS. Com.?/. Coughlin, 123 Mass. 436. 

In statute, Emerson v. Bowers, 14 N. Y. 449. 

DBY-BOCE. In statute. Pearson v. Commercial Ins Co., 15 C. B. (N. S.) 304. 

J>BY G^ODS. In insurance poiicy. Basse! v. American Ins. Co., 2 Hughes, 532. 

and gproceries. In insurance policy. Germania Ins. Co. v. 

Francis, 52 Miss. 458. 

DUB. Carr v. Thompson, 67 Mo. 472 ; Goddaid v. Town of Sejrmour, 30 Conn. 

395 • Allen V. Patterson, 7 N. Y. 476 , U. S. v. State Bk., 6 Peters, 
29; Scudder v. Scudder, 10 N. J. (L.) 2340, Legett v. Bank, 25 
Barb. 326. 

In contract. District Tp. v. District Tp., 47 Iowa, 183. 

In guaranty. Bainbridge v. Warde, 16 Q. B. loi. 

In insurance policy- Allen v. Hudson River Ins. Co., 19 Barb. 442. 

In mortgage. Fowler v. Hoffman, 31 Mich. 215. 

In statute. Re Iron Co., 2 Ch. Div< loo: re Pearcy, L. R., 13 Eq. Caa, 
309 , Bowen v. Slocum, 17 Wis. 181. 

and payable. In statute. Turk v. Stahl, 53 Mo. 437. 

In will. Medham v. Williams, L. R., 2 Eq. Cas. 396 ^ re Wilmoit, L. 
R , 7 Eq. Cas. 534. 

and to become . In contract, Kellogg?/. Barber, 14 Barb. 11. 

care. Jones v. Andover, 10 Allen, 18 - Butteriield v. Western R. 

Co., 10 Allen, 532. 

cause. In statute. State v. Common Council, 9 Wis. 260. 

course of law. Kansas Pacific R. Co. v. Dunmeyer, 19 Kas. 

539; Wilburn v. McCalley, 63 Ala. 436; Reagh v. Span n, 3 Stew. 
100; Thomas v. Woods, 4 Cow. 173; Backus z/. Shepherd, 11 Wend. 
629 , Simms v. Slocum, 3 Cranch, 300. 

diligence. Jones v, McGuirk, 51 111. 382; Keener?/. Finger, 70 

N. C. 3S- 
notice. In notary* s certificate. Seneca Co. Bk. v. Neass, 3 N. Y. 



442. 
In plea. Cullum v. Casey, 9 Port. 133 (33 Am. Dec. 304); Lawrences^. 
Bowman, i McAll. 421. 

In statute. Downing v. Stephens, 57 Tenn. 454. 

or to grow . In contract. Van Hook v. Walton, 28 Tex. 59. 

process of law. In constitution. Kennard v. Louisiana, 2 Otto, 

480 ; Walker v. Sauvinet, 2 Otto, 91 ; Pennoyer v. Neft, 5 Otto, 714 ; 
Murray v. Hoboken, 18 How. 272 ; Stuart v. Palmer, 74 N. Y. 183; 
Wetherbee v. Supervisors, 70 N. Y. .228; re Hatch, 43 N. Y. (S. C.) 
89; Bertholf «/. O'Riley, 74 N. Y. 509; re Ryers, 72 N. Y. i ; Taylor 



DUE. 



"3 



DUPLICATE. 



DUE — Continued. 



DUB-BIUi. 
DUEL. 
DUG. 
DTJI.Y. 



DUMB. 
DXnnTAGS. 

DUPUCATS. 



z/. Porter, 4 Hill, 140; Reaghz/. Spann, 3 Stew. 100; Clark v. Mitchell. 
64 Mo. 564 ; Munn v. People, 69 111. 80 ; Campbell v. Campbell, 63 
111. 462 ; Zeigler v. R. Co., 58 Ala. 594 ; Lowxy v. Rainwater, 70 Mo. 
152; Spealman v, Missouri, etc., R. Co., 71 Mo. 434; Brown t/. Levee 
Commrs., 50 Miss. 468 ; Bank of Columbia v, Oakley, 4 Wheat. 235 ; 
Sears z/. Cottrell, 5 Mich. 251 ; Rockwell v, Nearing, 35 N. Y. 302; 
Cook V. Gregg. 46 N. Y. 439; Campbell v, Evans, 45 N. Y. 356; 
Metropolitan Board of Health v, Heister, 37 N. Y. 660; Happy 
v. Mosher, 48 N. Y. 313; Embury v, Connor, 3 N. Y. 511 ; People 
V, Mayor of Brooklyn, 4 N. Y. 419; People v. Heuck. 21 N. Y. 595 ; 
Westervelt v, Gregg. 12 N. Y. 202 ; Burch v. Newbury, 10 N. Y. 374 ; 
Ex parte Ah Fook, 49 Cal. 402 ; Pryor v. Downey, 50 Cal. 389. 

— prooess of law-. In constitution. McMillan v, Anderson. 95 U. 
S. 37 ; Pearson v. Yewdall. 95 U. S. 294 ; Pennoyer v, NefF, 95 U. 
S. 714; Davidson v. New Orleans. 96 U. S. 97; Atchison &c., R. 
Co. V. Baty, 6 Neb. 37 ; South Platte Land Co. v. Comm'rs, 7 Neb. 
253; re Hatch, 43 N. Y. (S. C.) 89; Beyman v. Black. 47 Tex. 558. 

— rights. In mortgage, Ryerson v. Boorman. 8 N. J. (Eq.) 701. 

— security. Gray v. Fox. i N. J. (Eq.) 259. 



taking. In statute. Queen v. Justices. 10 Q. B. 796. 

to B and A. In statement of debt, Amonett z/! Montague, 63 



Mo. 201. 

upon contract. Bowen v, Slocum, 17 Wis. 183. 

west. In deed. Wells z/. Company, 47 N. H. 235. 

claim justly . In statute, Sperry's Appeal. 47 Conn. 87. 

debts . In articles of association, Leggett v. Bank of Sing Sing, 

24 N. Y. 283. 

debts justly . In statute, Baird v, Williams, 19 Pick. 381. 



moneys 
nothing 
sum 



— him. In will, Swearingen v, Taylor, 14 Mo. 391. 

— . Mason v. Mason, 67 Me. 547. 

In statute, Looney v, Hughes, 26 N. Y. 514. 



In statute, Gaines v, Craig, 24 Ark. 477. 

Herriott v. State, i McMuU. 126 ; State v, Taylor, i Treadw. Const. 107, 

opened and made. Robbins v, Chicago, 4 Wall. 657. 

Rockwell V, Merwin, 45 N» Y. 166; Paynter v. Queen, 10 Q. B. 919; 
Queen v, Inhabitiints, 8 Q. B. 877; Jones v, Davis, 22 Wis. 424; 
Reg. V, Gloucestershire, 7 El. & Bl. 812. 

In indictment. Queen v, Crossley, 10 Ad. & Ell. 133. 

In plea, Nightengale v, Wilcoxson, 10 B. & C. 202 ; Butcher v, Stew- 
art, II M. & W. 875. 

and legally api)ointed. In indictment. Com. v. Chase, 127 

Mass. 7. , 

qualified. Edwardson v, Garnhart, 56 Mo. 81. 

served. In statute, Reg. v, Lightfoot, 6 El. & Bl. 824. 

animals In statute, McDaniel v. State. 5 Tex. (App.) 475. 



Insurance Co. v, Thwing, 13 Wall. 674; Thwing v. Great Western Ins. 

Co., 103 Mass. 406. 
In draft, Benton v, Martin, 40 N. Y. 345. 
In statute. Birch v, Edwards 5 C. B. 50 ; Lewis v, Roberts, 11 C. R 



DUPLICATE. 



"♦ 



DUTY. 



DUPLICATE 



DUBATION. 



DUBIira. 



DUST. 



DUTCH. 



DUTIB8. 



DUTY. 



Continued. 
25 ; Toms v, Cuming, 8 Scott, N. R. 917 ; Lewis t/. Roberts, 11 C. B. 
(N. S.) 25. 

of tazeB. In statute. Com. v. Beamish, 81 Pa. St. 389. 

original. Calling v. Trewelk, 6 B. & C. 395. 

thereof. In statute. Nelson v, Blakey, 54 Ind. 29. 

People V, Hill, 7 CaL 102. 

Biffin V, Bignell, 7 Hurl. & N. 877; Blair v, Coffman, 2 Overton, 176; 
Taylor z/. Jacques, 106 Mass. 291 ; Meek z/. Atkinson, i Bailey (Law;. 
84 (19 Am. Dec. 653); Fellows v. School Dist., 39 Me. 599; Breck 
V, Blanchard, 22 N. H. 303 ; Maisonaire v, Keating, 2 Gall. 325 ; U. 
S. V, Haskell, 4 Wash. C. C. 402 ; Hatter v. Greenlee, 1 Port 222 
(26 Am. Dec. 370). 

Park Bank v. Wood, 24 N. Y. 93. 

her widowhood. In will. Farmers' Bk. v, Hooff, 4 Cranch C. 



C. 323. 

— hifl natural lifb and no longer. In will, Clarke v. Smith. 49 
Md. 106. 

— BUdh time. In statute. Queen v, Francis, 18 Q. B. 527. 

— 8u6h trial. In statute, Maurer v. People, 43 N. Y. i. 

— the oontinnanoe thereof. In will, Rutland v, Wythe, 12 M. & 

W.374. 

— the lifetime of any former husband or wife. In statute, 
Cropsey v, Ogden, 11 N. Y. 228. 

— the natural lives. In will, Merrill v, Bickford, 65 Me. 1 18. 
the night. In insurance policy, Glendale Woolen Co. v. Pro- 



tection Ins. Co., 21 Conn. 18. 

— the pleasure of the governor. Kaufman v. Stone, 25 Ark. 336. 

— the trial. In statute. State v, Buckner, 25 Mo. 167. 

— the vacation. In statute, Hal ton v. Cove, i B. &. Ad. 558. 

— the voyage. In charter party. Crow v, Falk, 8 Q. R 467. 

— their lives. In will, Dow v, Doyle, 103 Mass. 491. 

— whioh time. In statute. Queen v, Tubbs, 9 Q. B. 663. 
working hours. In deed, Birney v. Phoenix Manuf. Co^ 128 

Mass. 49^- 

Reg. V, Wood, 5 El. and Bl. 55. 

ashes and rubbish. In statute, Lindon v, Stanbridge. 2 Hurl. 

& N. 52. 

terms. In insurance policy, Hendricks v, Ins. Co., L. R., 9 C. 



P. 460. 

In statute. State v. Maynard, 41 Conn. 540. 

of his oi&oe. In officer's bond. Bank of Carlisle v. Hopkins* 1 

T. B. Mon. 245 (15 Am. Dec. 113). 

of their oi&oe. In statute. State v. Maynard, 41 Conn. 540. 

Bank of Hartford v. Waterman. 26 Conn. 338 ; Fox v. Hills, i Conn. 
294 ; Fowler v, Frisbie, 3 Conn. 320 ; Harrison v. Bush, 5 El. A Bl. 

348. 
In statute. Com. of Kentucky v. Dennison, 24 How. 66; Pacific Ins. 

Co. V, Soule, 7 Wall. 433. 



DWELL. 



"5 



EACH. 



jyWSLL 



In statute. Brown t/. R. R. Co., 4 B. & S. 326; Shiels v. Raiti 7 C. B. 

116. 

iLINQ. In statute. King v. Inhabitants, i B. & C. 580; Dunston v, Paterson, 
5 C. R (N. S.) 280. 

in a . In indictment, Moore v. State, 40 Ala. 49. 

DWSLLINGK-HOUSE. Com. v, Reynolds, 122 Mass. 454 ; U. S. v, Johnson, 2 Cranch, 

C. C. 21; State V, Langford, i N. C. 253; State v, McGowan, 20 
Conn. 245; State v. Clark, 7 Jones (L.), 167; Hooker v. Com., 13 
Gratt. 763; Pitcher z/. People, 6 Mich, 142 , State v. Outlaw, 72 N. 
C. 598 ; State v. Mordecai, 68 N. C. 207. 

In contract, Pratt v, Paine, 119 Mass. 439. 

In insurance policy. Chase v, Hamilton Ins. Co., 20 N. Y. 52. 

In plea. Monks v. Dykes, 4 M. & W. 567. 

In statute. Mason v. People, 26 N. Y. 200 : Fire Dept. v, Butler, 35 N. 
Y. 302 ; Shepherd v. People. 19 N. Y. 537 ; Phelps t/, Rooney, 9 Wis. 
84; State V, Troth, 7 Vroom, 422 ; State v. Stiles, i Green, 172; re 
Lambert, 14 Bank Reg. 460; Elsmore v. Inhabitants, 8 B. & C. 465 ; 
Devoe v. Com., 3 Mete. 327 ; Llandoff Co. v, Lyndon, 8 C. B. (N. S.) 

5>7. 
DWELIJKGK-FIiAGB. Lisbon v, Lyman, 49 N. H. 553 ; Jefferson v, Washington, 19 

Me. 293. 
In statute, Fearon v, Mitchell; L. R., 7 Q. B. 690; Ash worth v, Hey- 
worth, 4Q. R 317. 

In statute, Adams v. Great Western R. Co., 6 Hurl. & N. 404; Alex- 
ander V, Jones, L. R., i Ex. 134 ; Corbitt v. General Steam Nav. Co., 
4 Hurl, ft N. 483 ; Keynsham Blue Line Co. v. Baker, 2 H. & C. 307. 

and has hia home. In statute, Parsonfield v, Perkins, 2 Me. 



DWELT. 



DYXNa. 



41 1 ; Turner v, Buckfied, 3 Me. 229 ; Putnam v, Johnston, 10 Mass. 
488; Harston v, Harston, 27 Miss. 704. 

Cutts V, Haskins, 9 Mass. 547 ; Harvard College v. Gore, 5 Pick. 379. 

to aeeda. In statute, Francis v. Maas, 26 W. R. 422. 

dedaratioiia. Starkey v. People, 17 111. 17; May v. State, 55 

Ala. 39 ; ex parte Nettles, 58 Ala. 268. 

without lawful issue. In deed, Vaughn v. Gay, \^ Mo. 429. 

without ohildren. In will, Fairchild v. Crane. 13 N. J. (Eq.) 



105. 

without heirs. In will, Kent v, Armstrong, 6 N. J. (Eq.) 637. 

without issue. In will. Gray v, Bridgeforth, 33 Miss. 312; 

Brushaer v, Macy, 3 J. J. Marsh, 91 ; McKay v, Merrifield, 14 B. 
Monr. 323; Armstrong v. Armstrong, 14 B. Monr. 344; Moore v, 
Moore, 4 Mon. 203; Birney v. Richardson, 5 Dana, 432; Daniel v, 
Thompson, 14 B. Monr. 708 ; Pool v. Renniny, 9 B. Monr. 625 ; Den v, 
Allaire, Spencer, 63; Condict v. King, 2 Beasley, 375; Den v, Tay- 
lor, 2 South, 413; Den i/. Howell, Spencer, 411; Denn r/. Small, 
Spencer, 151; Moorehouse v, Cotheal, i Zab. 480; Armstrong z/. 
Kent, 2 Halst. Ch. 637; Den v, Schenck, 3 Halst. 29: Trumbull v. 
Gibbons, 2 Zab. 117 ; Seddel v. Wells, Spencer, 223; Den v. Black- 
well, 3 Green, 386; Kennedy v. Kennedy, 5 Dutch. 185. 

In plea. Cundell v, Dawson. 4 C. B. 402. 

load so delivered. In agreement. Withers v, Reynolds, 2 

R & Ad. 884. 



EACH. 



zx6 



EFFECTS. 



EABIfEST. 



EABNINGS. 



SABTH. 



EACH —Continued. 

his one-half. In contract. Costigan v, Lunt, 104 Mass. 217. 

otBanBe* In statute. Suydam v. Smith, 52 N. V. 383. 

Ibr lis and of us* In power of attorney. Dalrymple v. Frascr, 

2 Q. B. 700. 
in case. In insurance policy. Donnell v. Columbian Ins. Co., 

2 Sumner, 366. 

In statute. State v. Girkin, i I red. 121 ; State v. Green, 7 I red. 39; 

State %f. Abram, 10 Ala. 928. 

In statute. Howe v. Hayivard, 108 Mass. 54; Blenkinshop z/. Clayton, 
7 Taunt. 597;'Artcher V. Zeh, 5 Hill, 200. 

Soniers z/. Keliher, 115 Mass. 165. 

In statute. Kendall v. Kingsley, 120 Mass. 94; Jenks v. Dyer, 102 
Mass. 215; Brown v. Hebard, 20 Wis. 330; Lovell v. Newton. 4 
C. P. Div. 7 ; Union Pacific R. Co. v. U. S., 9 Otto, 402. 

In contract. Dickinson v. Poughkeepsie, 75 N. Y. 65. 

In statute. Hatch v. Hawkes, 126 Mass. 177. 

excavation of ; In contract to build road. Shepard v, St. Charles 

Co., 28 Mo. 373. 

Hewlins v. Sheppard, 5 B. & C. 229; Mounsey v. Ismay, 3 H. & C» 
486 ; Stevenson v. Wallace, 27 Gratt. %7 ; Ritger v. Parker, 8 Cush. 
147 ; Morrison v. Marquardt, 24 Iowa, 35 ; Big Mountain Improve- 
ment Co.'s Appeal, 54 Pa. St. 361 ; Bowen v. Team, 6 Rich. 298; 
Cave V. Crafts, 53 Cal. 135 ; Morgan v. Smith, 11 111. 194; Garrison 
V. Rudd, 19 111. 564; Price v. Keator, 70 N. Y. 419; Boston Water 
Co. V. Boston, etc., R. Co., 16 Pick. 522. 

other . In statute. Webb. v. Bird, 10 C. B. (N. S.) 268 ; 13 C. R 

(N. S.) 841 ; Mounsey v. Ismay, 3 H. & C. 486 ; Partridge v. Scott 

3 M. & W. 220 ; Hide v. Thornborough, 2 C. & H. 250; Angus v. 
Dalton, 4 Q. B. Div. 162 ; Bliss v. Hall, 4 Bing. N. C. 183. 

actions resi>ecting . In statute. Crittenton v. Alger, 11 Mete. 

284. 
of the Cape of Gk>od Hope. In statute. Powers v. Comly, 1 1 



EASEMENT. 



EASEMENTS. 



EAST. 



EASTERLY. 



Otto. 789. 

Pratt 7/. Woodward, 32 Cal. 219. , 

EATINGh-HOUSE. In statute. State v. Hall. 73 N. C. 252. 

EAVESDBOFFINa. Com. 7/. Lovett, 4 CIark:(Pa.). 5; State v. Williams, 2 Tenn. 

108: State z/. Pennington. 3 Head, 299. 

Mortmain v. Lefaux, 6 Mart. 654 (12 Am. Dec. 485); Pennoyer «. Neff, 
5 Otto, 721. 

or maintain. In statute. Ruohs v. Backer, 6 Heisk. 395. 

in England and in the Protestant religion. In will. Claver- 



EDITOB. 



EDUCATE. 
EDUCATED. 



EFFECT. 



ingv. Ellison. 7 H. L. Cas. 707. 

of the testimony. In statute. Hill v. Nichols, 50 Ala. 336. , 

prosecute with . In bond. Perreau v. Be van. 5 B. & C. 291. 



take 



Maize v. State, 4 Ind. 342. 



EFFECTED* 
EFFECrrS. 



in contract. McCreery v. Green, 38 Mich. 172. 

In rule of court. The Alpena 7 Fed. Rep. 363. 

In statute. Keyes v. Milwaukee, etc., R. Co., 25 Wis. 693; Bank of 
Missouri v. Price, i Mo. 55 ; State v. Newell, i Mo. 178 ; Wrig-htv. 
F.iirfield, 2 B. & Ad. 730; Rex v. Aslett. i Russ. & Ry. ^t. 



EFFECTS. 



117 



ELECTION. 



EFFECrrS^ Continued. 

In will. Re O'Loughlin, L. R, 2 P. & D. 102 ; Smyth v. Smyth, 8 Ch. 
Div. 567. 

In writ. Cummins v. Garvin, 65 Me. 301. 

both real and personaL In will. Hogan v. Jackson, i Cowp. 

299; Shell V. Pattison, 16 East, 222. 

all my . In wilL Ennis v. Smith, 14 How. 400. 

all my whatsoever. In will. Campbell v. Prescott, 17 C. R 

(N. S.) 503. 
claims and . In power. De Cordova t/. Knowles, 37 Tex. 19. 

furniture and other household . In will. Foxall v. McKen- 

ney, 3 Cranch C. C. 206. 

goods, chattels and • In plea. Pitt v. Shew, 4 B. & Aid. 206. 

goodsy merchandise and . In deed. Welsh v. Parish, i Hill. 

(S. C). 155. 
master's • In insurance policy. Duff v. McKenzie, 3 C. B. (N. 

S.) 27. 
property or money, or . In statute. Banning v. Sibley, 3 

Minn. 389. 

such as shall be ux)on my fiurm. In will. Doe v. Hunell, 5 

B. & Aid. 21. 

EFFECfTTJAIi. attachment* In statute. Peabody v. Hamilton, 106 Mass. 222. 

ETTEDBB. Chidestert/. Springfield, etc., R. Co., $9 IH. 87. 

party. In contract. Bird v. Thornbury, i B. Mon. 5. 

or of them. In will Doe v. Doyle, 13 Q. B. 98. 

EJXJSDXaC 

EJECTED. 
ELAPSED. 



ELECnOK. 



generis. Com. v. Rice, 9 Mete. 258 ; EUery v. New England 

Ins. Co., 8 Pick. 14; Swift v. Union Ins. Co., 122 Mass. 575. 

Perry v. Fitzhouse, 8 Q. B. 757. 

then • In plea. Johnson v. Gibson, i El. &B1. 416. 

In statute. People v. Peck, 1 1 Wend. 604 (27 Am. Dec. 604). 

male lineal descendant. In will. Thelluson v. Rendelsham, 7 

H. L. Cas. 629. 

son. In will, Meredith v. Trefey, 12 Ch. Div. 171 ; Bathusrt v. 

Errington, 2 App. Cas. 698 ; Collingwood v. Stanhope, L. R., 4 H. 
L. 43 ; Livesey v, Livesey 2 H. L. Cas. 419. 

In constitution. Speed?/. Crawford, 3 Mete. 210; Comm'rs v. Louis* 
ville, 3 Bush, 602. 

In statute. King v. Adams. 2 Ad. & Ell. 413. 

In constitution. Speed v. Crawford, 3 Mete. 210 ; Comm'rs v. Louis- 
ville, 3 Bush, 602. 

In indictment. Com. t/. Desmond, 122 Mass. 12. 

In statute. County Seat Case, 15 Kas. $00 ; Sturgis v. Spofford, 45 N. 

Y. 447 ; Wheeler v. Brady, 1 5 Kas. 26 , $tate v. Tucker, 54 Ala. 205. 

district. In constitution. Chase v. Miller, 41 Pa. St. 403 , Mc- 

Daniels' Case, 2 Pa. L. J. 82 . . 

in this State. In statute. Quarles v. State, 5 Humph. 561; Given 

V. Rogers, 11 Ala. 543. 

officer. In statute. U. S. v. Clayton, 2 Dill. 219. 

agent fbr expenses. In statute. Grant v. Guinness, 17 C. B. 

200. 



ELECTION. Il8 EMPLOYED 



^LECnON — Continued. 

general . In statute, Kenfield z/. Irwin, 52 Cal. 164; 

King, 17 Mo. 511. 

speoial . In statute. Kenfield v. Irwin, 52 Cal. 164. 

ELECTOR qualified , In statute. Sanford v. Prentice, 28 Wis. 358. 

In statute. Taylor v. Taylor, 10 Minn. 107. 

Polack V. Pioche, 35 Cal. 416. 

or other oauae. In statute. Hatch v. Stampfer, 42 Conn. 28. 

BlaEEBEOSYNABY. oorporation. Dartmouth College 0. Woodward. 4 Wheat 

518; Society v. New Haven, 8 Wheat. 464. 

ELIGIBLE. In constitution. Searcy 0. Grow, 15 Cal. 117 ; State v. Clarke, 3 Nev. 

566. Carson v. McPhetndge, 15 Ind. 327. 

ELSK In note. Ferris v. Bond, 4 B. & Aid. 679. 

BIJ9EWHEBE. In contract. Brown «. Jones, 2 Gall. 277 ; Wood v. The Nimrod, 

Gilp. 85. 

In will. Chester v. Chester, 2 P. Wms. 56 ; Guidot v. Guidot, 3 Atk. 
254. 

EUANCEPATION. Queen v. Inh'b'ts, 7 Q. B. 575. 

In statute. The William King, 2 Wheat 148; McBride v. Marine 



Ins. Co., 5 Johns. 299. 

EMBEZZLE. Cora. v. Concannon, 5 Allen, 502 ; Pagan v. Knox, 40 N. Y. (S. C.) 

41 ; Com. V. Hays, 14 Gray, 62 ; People 0. Belden, 37 Cal. 51. 

In indictment. Tillinghast v. Cook, 9 Mete. 140. 

In statute. State v. Reilly, 4 Mo. App. 396. 

abstract or wUAilly misapply. In statute. U. S. v. Taintor 



II Blatchf. 375. 

EMBEZZLED. In statute. Sawin v. Martin, 1 1 Allen, 439. 

EMBLEMENTS. Reif! v. Reil!, 64 Pa. St 134. 

EMBRACERY. Grannis v. Brandon, 5 Day, 260; State v. Sales, 2 Nev. 268« 

EMINENT. domain. West River Bridge v. Dix, 6 How. 507 ; Wells v. 

Somerset, etc., R. Co., 47 Me. 345 ; Beekman v. Saratoga, etc., R. 
Co., 47 Me. 245 ; Jones v. Walker, 2 Paine. 688 ; Charles River 
' Bridge v. Warren Bridge, 11 Pet. 420; Memphis!/. Overton, 4 Yerg. 

387 ; Symonds v. City of Cincinnati, 14 Ohio, 147. 

EMIT. In constitution. Craig v. State, 4 Pet. 410; Linn v. State Bk., i Scam. 

Z'j (25 Am. Dec. 78, note), Briscoe v. Bank, 11 Pet. 257. 

EMPLOY. In plea. Elderton v. Emmons, 6 C. B. 175. 

in his . In charter-party. Ripley v. Scaife, 5 B. & C. 167. 

EMPLOYE. In statute. Stone v. U. S., 3 Ct of CI. 260; Mallory v. U. S.. 3 Ct of 

CI. 257; Watson v. Watson Manufg Co., 30 N. J. (Eq.) 588, Water 
Co. V. Ware, 16 Wall. 566 ; Moore v. Heaney, 14 Md. 559. 

Re Muldaur, 8 Ben. 65; U. S. v. Morris. 14 Pet 464 ; U. S. v. The 
Catherine, 2 Paine, 721 ; U. S. v. Nourse, 4 Cranch C. C. 151. 

In statute. The Alexander, 3 Mason, 175 ; U. S.v. Forrest 3 Cranch 
C. C. 60; Beadon v. Parlett, L. R., 6 Q. B. 718 ; School Dist. v. Dil- 
man, 22 Ohio St. 194; Hardcastle v. Jones, 3 B. & S. 160; Reg. t^. 
Freke, 5 El. & Bl. 947 ; Queen v. Jay, 8 El. & Bl. 470. 

by him. In statute. McCluskey v. Cromwell, 11 N. Y. 593. 

in or about the worka In statute. Hyman v. Wright, 2 C. P. 

Div. 397. 



EMPLOYED. 119 ENEMIES. 



— Continued. 

actually . In statute. Ex parte Moses, L. R., 9 Q. B. i. 

newspapers by tlie oorporation. In charter of city. Re 

Petition of Astor, 50 N. Y. 363. 

In statute. State v, Foster, 37 Iowa, 146 ; Chawner v. Cummins, 8 O. 
B., 311. 

EMPLOYMENT, by virtue of suoh . In statute, Reg. v Prince, M. & M. 21 

Reg. V. Batty, 2 Moody, 257 ; Reg. v, Thorlcy, i Moody, 343; Reg. 
V, Arman, Dears. C. C. 575; Reg. v. Mellish, Russ. & Ry. 80 ; Reg. 7/. 
May, 8 Cox C. C. 421 ; Reg. v, Harris, 6 Cox C C. 363 , Reg. v. 
Hawtin, 7 C. & P. 281 ; Reg. i/. Cutlom, 12 Cox C. C. 469 ; Reg. v, 
Beechey» Russ. & Ry. 519 ; Reg. v. Smith, Russ. & Ry. 15 ; Reg. v. 
Barker, i D. & R. 19; Reg. v, Nettleton, i Moody, 59 ; People v, 
Sherman, 10 Wend. 298, People «/. Hennessey. 15 Wend. 147, Peo- 
ple V, Dalton, 15 Wend. 581 ; Com. v, Hayes, 14 Gray, 62; ex parte 
Hedley, 31 Cal. 108; State v, Johnson. 48 Iowa, 370; State v, 
Foster, 37 Iowa, 146. 

SMOIaUMENT. annual , In statute, Queen v, Postmaster-Genera), i Q. R 

Div. 658. 

EMPTY* Pennie v, Chesapeake Canal Co., 9 How. 189. 

EN AjjshACIOK. In conveyance. Mulford v, Le Franc, 26 Cal. 88. 

ENCLOSED. and cultivated fields. In statute, Biggerstaff v, St. L. , K. C. & 

N. R. R, 60 Mo. 567. 
ENCLOSUBE. Porter v, Aldrich, 39 Vt. 326. 

In statute. Keith v, Bradford, 39 Vt. 34; Taylor v, Wei bey, 36 Wis. 42. 
ENCROACH. In statute. Easton v, Richmond Bd., L. R., 7 Q. B. 69. 

END. of the voyage. In agreement, Bradford v. Drew, 5 Mete. 191. 

ENDANGER. her life. In statute, Thornberry v. Thornberry, 2 J. J. Marsh. 

322. 

the life of his wift. In statute, Beebe v. Bee be, 10 Iowa, 133; 

Cole V, Cole, 23 Iowa, 433 ; Caruthers v, Caruthers, 13 Iowa, 266 ; 
Knight 2/. Knight, 31 Iowa, 451. 

ENDAITGERED. or his lifb be . In statute. State v, Agee, 68 Mo. 264. 

ENDEAVORING. to make a revolt. In statute. U. S. v. Kelly, 11 Wheat. 

417. 
ENDEAVORS, use his best . In contract, Vickers v, Overend, 7 Hurl ft 

N. 92. 

EN DECIaARATION. de simulation. Erwint/. Bk. of Kentucky, 5 La. Ann. i ; 

Edwards v, Ballard, 20 La. Ann. 169. 

ENDED. and debt and ooets paid. In docket entry, Phillips v, Israel, 

10 S. & R. 391. 

ENDOTKTMENT. French v, Pratt, 27 Me. 381 ; Runkel v. Winnemiller, 4 Harr. h M. 

429. 
In statute. State Reformed Church v. Lyon, 3 Vroom, 360; State v. 
Kroolman, 9 Vroom, 323. 

or fUnd. In statute. State v, Lyon, 32 N. J. (L.) 360. 

The Venice, 2 Wall. 258. 

In constitution, U. S. v, Greathouse, 2 Abb. U. S. 364 ; 4 Sawyer, 464. 

pirates and assailing thieves. In insurance policy, Monon- 



^^;,ii 



^ahela Ins. Co. v, Chester, 43 Pa. St. 491. 



ENEMIES 



120 



ENTER. 



ENEMIES — Continued. 



'8 



164. 



-. In bill of lading. Russell v. Merriam, 17 C. B. (N. S.) 

In statute. Stuart v. U. S., 18 Wall. 84. 

— . Coggs V, Bernard, 2 Ld. Raym. 909: Morse v. Sine, i 



ENFOBCE. 
ENGAGE. 



king's 

Ventris, 190. 

property of the . Taylor v. Perkins, 24 Ark. 338. 

public . Boon v. The Belfast, 40 Ala. 184; King v. Shepherd, 3 

Story. 349; Thomas z/. Boston, etc., R. Co., 10 Mete. 472 ; Lewis «. 
Ludwick, 6 Coldw. 369. 

the oolleotion of fines. In statute. People v. Christerson, 59 



111. 157. 

Ruez/. Rue, 21 N. J. (L.) 369. 
in or carry on any business. In statute, Harris v. State, 50 



Ala. 127. 
ENGAGEMENT. In statute. People v, Utica Ins. Co., is Johns. 385. 



ENGAGES. 
ENGAGING. 



in shooting. In statute. Smith v. State, 50 Ala. \^), 



ENGINE. 



eng: 



ENGINES. 

ENGRAVE. 

ENJOYED. 



ENJOYMENT. 

ENJOYING. 
ENIaABGE. 

ENUSTED. 



In guaranty, Norton v, Powell, 4 Man. & G. 42. 

in or carrying on the business of keeping a theater. In 

statute, Gillman v. State, 55 Ala. 248. 

In statute, Blanchard v. Sprague, 3 Sumner, 280. 

calculated to destroy human life or inflict grievous bodily 

harm* In statute, Wotten v, Dawkins, 2 C. B (N. S.) 413. 

or instrument of destruction. In statute. Allen v. Thomp- 
son, L. R., 5 Q. R 336. 

fixed . In statute. Thomas v. Jones, 5 B. & S. 916. 

LING. work* In statute. Queen v. R. Co., i6 Q. B. 20; Wilson v. 

Eden, 18 Q. B. 488. 

In statute. Jones v, Festmog, R. Co., 9 B. & S. 843. 

Wood V. Abbott, 5 Blackf. 325. 

In will. Polden v, Bosland, L. R.. i Q. B. 157. 

or taken the benefit of such exemption. In constitution. 

Baker v. State, 17 Fla. 406. 

to be by her. In will. Chism v, Williams, 29 Mo. 288. 

thereof as of ;right. In statute. Tickle v. Brown, 4 Ad. & 



Ell. 369. 

In constitution. Re Smith, 38 Cal. 704. 

In statute. Att'y-Gen. v. Mayor, L. R., 6 H. L. 303. 

In statute, Sheffield v. Otis, 107 Mass. 282 ; Barker v. Chesterfield, 
102 Mass. 129; U. S.T/. Thompson, 2 Sprague, 103; Tylerv. Pome- 
roy, 8 Allen, 485. 

as a soldier. In statute. Walton v. Gavin, 16 Q. B. 81. 

ENLISTMENT. Milliard v, Stewartstown, 48 N. H. 280 ; Tyler v. Ponieroy, 8 Allen, 

480. 

ENROLMENT. In statute. The Mohawk, 3 Wall. 566. 

ENSUINQ. for the year. In statute. Chase v. State, Spencer, 218. 

ENTER. Chotard v. Pope, 12 Wheat. 586. 

In statute. Kellogg v. Robinson, 32 Conn. 335 ; Moriarty v. Brown, 
39 Iowa, 634; U. S. V, An Open Boat, 5 Mason, 120. 



ENTER. 



121 



ENTR Y. 



— Continued. 



£NTEB£D. 



SNTEBINQ. 



into oontraot. In statute. Weed v. Tucker, i8 N. Y. 422. 

or be in any land* In statute, Reg. v, Pratt, 4 El. & Bl. 863. 

on tlie refisrenoe. In statute. Baker v. Stephens, L. R., 2 Q. 

B. 525, 8 B. & S. 445. 

Rex V. Smith, Russ. & Ry. 417 ; Rex v. Bird, 9 C. & P. 44 ; Reg. 7/. 
Bailey, Russ. & Ry. 341 ; Reg. v. Jordan, 7 C. & P. 432 ; Reg. v. 
Winter, 8 C. &. P. 747 ; Reg. v. O'Brien, 4 Cox C. C. 398 ; Reg. v. 
Davis, Russ. ^ Ry. 533 ; Reg. v. Spriggs, i M. & R. 357 ; Pines v. 
State, 50 Ala. 153 ; State v. Whitby, 15 Kas. 402 ; Franco v. State, 
42 Tex. 276 ; Pickering v, Rudd, i Stark. 48; Reg. v. Brice, Russ. & 
Ry. 450; State v. Willis, 7 Jones (N. C), 190; Donohoo v. State, 
36 Ala. 281 ; Reg. v. Rust, i Moody C. C. 184 ; Rex v. Hughes, 2 
East P. C. 491 ; State v, McDaniel, i Wins. N. C. 248 ; State v, 
McCall, 4 Ala. 643. 

or attempting to enter, leaving or attempting to leave, a 

public conveyance. In insurance policy, Sawtelle v. Railway 
Pass Ass.Co. 15 Blatchf. 216. 

short. Blaine v. Browne, 11 R. I. 119. 



EBTEBTAimiENT. In statute. Hawes v. Bd., i Ex. Div. 385; Muir v. Keay, L. R., 

10 Q. B. 595. 

for man and horse. In statute. Scattergood v. Waterman, 2 

Miles, 323. 

of the stage. In statute. Rex v. Handy, 6 T. R. 286 ; Wigan %». 

Strange, i Harr. & Ruth. 41; L. R., i C. P. 176. 

public refreshment and . In statute. Taylor v. Oram, i H. & 

C. 376. 



JbLNTlHK 



JgJHTlTU g). 



16 



In statute. Nash v. Douglass, 12 Abb. Pr. (N. S.) 187. 

Hawkins v. Filkins, 24 Ark. 324. 

benefit. In deed. Heathman v. Hall, 3 Ired. (Eq.) 414. 

day. In statute. Robertson «. State, 43 Ala. 329. 

interest. McLeroy «. Duckworth, 13 La. Ann. 410. 

unconditional and sole ownership. In insurance policy. Ins. 

Co. V, Haven, 5 Otto, 249. 

In statute. Taylor v. Taylor, L. R., 20 Eq. Cas. 297; Conoley v. Gale, 
54 Ala. 269. 

In will. Umhers v. Jaggard, L. R., 9 Eq. Cas. 200 ; re Clinton, L. R., 
13 Eq. Cas. 295. 

person to vote. In statute. Whiteley «. Chappell, L. R., 4 Q. 

B. 147. 
Alexander z/. Greenup, i Munf. 134(4 Am. Dec. 541.) 
In statute. Bissell v. Beckwith, 32 Conn. 509. 

Innerarity v. Morris, i Ala, 660. 

In indictment. Com. v. Glover, 1 1 1 Mass. 395. 

In statute. U. S. «. Baker, 5 Ben. 25 ; Hatcher v. Gammell, 49 Ga. 576; 
U. S. V. Cargo of Sugar 3 Sawyer, 48. 

of a Ibreclosnre of a mortgage. In insurance policy. Mc- 

Intire v. Norwich Ins. Co., 102 Mass. 230. 

of appearance. Cooly v. Lawrence, s Duer, 605. 

after such . In statute. Ullman v. Murphy, 11 Blatchf. 358. 



ENUMERA TED. 



ERECTION'. 



SNUMEBATED. 
SQUAIi. 



SQUAUiY. 



JBQXnPFING. 
SQUTFABIiE. 



SQTJITABLT. 
BQUITY. 



and deflnecL In statute. Cutting v. Cutting. 20 Hun, 365. 

portioii. In will. Cummingsz/. Bramhall, 120 Mass. 558. 

to. In contract. Stewart v, Lehigh Valley R. Co., 38 N. J. (L.) 

505- 
In will. McNeilledge v. Galbraith, 8 S. & R. 43 (i i Am. Dec $72). 
and in oonunon* In will. Watkins v. Frederick, 1 1 H. L. Cas. 

358. 

credible. Collins t'. Stephens* 58 Ala. 545. 

diTided. In statute. Howard v. Howard, 19 Conn. 318. 

In will. Parnell T/. Culbertson, 12 Bush, 370; Walters v. Cnitcher, 
15 R Mon. 10; Wells v. Newton, 4 Bush, 159; Brown v. Brown, 6 
Bush, 649; Henderson v. Womack, 6 Ired. (Eq.) 437; Jackson «• 
Luquere, 5 Cow. 221 ; Youngs' Appeal, 83 Pa. St. 59. 

to be divided. In will. Kean v. Hoffecker, 2 Harr. (Del) 103 

(29 Am. Dec 336). 

In statute. Atfy-Gen. v. Sillem, 2 H. & C. 623. 

. Appeal Tax. CL v. St. Peter's Academy, 50 Md. 321. 

In statute. Gleim v. The Belmont, 11 Mo. 113. 

assignment. Christmas'?/. Russell, 14 Wall. 69^ 

estate* Avery v. Durfees, 9 Ohio. 145. 

mortgage. Hall v. Mobile, etc., R. Co. 58 Ala. 10. 

Womack v. Thomas, 48 Ala. 463. 
Savings Inst. v. Makin, 23 Me. 36a 

In statute. Thornton v. Lane, 1 1 Ga. 459; Butler 0. Weathers, 39 Ga. 

524. 

of redemption. Si mon ton v. Gray, 34 Me. 50; State v. Laval, 4 

McCord, 340. 

seized in law or in . In statute. Mcllvaine v. Smith, 42 Mo. 45. 

wife's — ^. Helms v. Franciscus, 2 Bland Ch. 544(20 Am. Dec. 404). 



EQUrVAIJSNT. Tyler «. Boston, 7 Wall. 327. 



TTOABE 



In statute. U. S. v. Anderson, 3 Cranch C. C. 203. 

In contract. Johnson v. Female University, 35 111. 518; San ford tf. 
Rawlings, 43 III. 92. 

In statute. Smith v. Stokes, 4 B. & S. 87 ; State v. Brown, 16 Conn. 
56; Whitbrook v. West, 26 Conn. 406; Wadleigh «. Gilman, 13 
Me. 403 (20 Am. Dec. 188). 

a building. In statute. Brown v. Hunn, 27 Conn. 332. 

and build* In statute. Douglass 0. Com., 2 Rawle, 262; Tuttle 

v. State, 4 Conn. 68 ; Hastings v. Aiken, i Gray, 163. 

or lease. In charter. DeWitt v. San Francisco, 2 Cal. 296. 



ERECTED. 



EBECfTIOK. 



In contract. Johnston v. Female Univ., 35 111. 518; Sanford «. Raw* 
lings, 43 111. 92. 

In statute. King «. Inh'b'ts, 2 B. & Ad. 815. 

or built. In statute. King v. Inh'b'ts, 5 B. & Ad. 383. 

building . In statute. McGary v. People, 45 N. Y. 153. 

In statute. Trask v. Searle, 121 Mass. 229; Brown «. Hunn, 27 Conn. 
322 ; Douglass v. Com., 2 Rawle, 262; Reg. v. Whittingham, 9 C. & 
P. 234; St. George «. Sparrow, 16 C. B. (N. S.) 214. 



ERECTION. 



123 



ESTABLISH. 



— Continued. 

oonstniotion or flniahing. In statute, McDermott o. Palmer, 

8 N. Y. 383. 

alter or repair. In statute, Trask 9. Searle, \^\ Mass. 229. 

oonstruotion or flniwhlng of buildings. In statute. McDer- 
mott V. Palmer, 2 E. D. Smith, (>j% ; Moran v, Cfaaae, $2 N. Y. 346. 

ofadwvltiag-lMKUM. hi stafwit. Booth 0. State, 4 Conn. 6$. 

of any Imilding. Indeed. Shawo. Hitchcock. 119 Mass. 254. 

or oonstniotion of a building. In statute. Presbyterian 



SSCHEAT. 



XSTABUBH. 



Church «. Allison. 10 Pa. St. 418; re Hewitt 10 Pa. St. 379 ; Perigo 
«. Vanhorn, 2 Miles, 359; Miller?/. Oliver. 8 Watts, 314; Harris «. 
Woolston, 3 Phila. 376; Smith v. Nelson, 2 Phila. 113; Rand 0. 
Mann, 3 Phila. 429; Kirk v. Talifierro, 8 S. & M. 754; Dreisbach 0. 
. Keeler, 2 Pa. St. 77 ; Armstrong v. Ware, 20 Pa. St. 519. 

used in oonduoting the buaineaa of any mine. In statute. 

Harwell v. Hundred. 14 Q. B. 704. 

and improvementa. In deed. West 0. Blakeway, 2 Man. h, G. 

752. 
or additions. In deed. Holbrook 0. Chamberlin, 1 16 Mass. I55« 

and keeps a billiard table. In statute. Sears v. West. 1 Mur« 

phy, 291 (3 Am. Dec. 694). 

Baldwin v. U. S. Tel. Co., 6 Abb. Pr. (N. S.) 405. 

In statute, Rankin v. Pitkin. 50 Iowa, 313. 

in a judgment. In statute. Bickel 0. Erskine, 43 Iowa, 213. 

In bill of lading. Sandford 0. Housatonic R. Co., 11 Cush. 155. 

of fiEK)t. In statute. Adslt v. Wilson, 7 How. Pr. 64 ; Kasson •. 

Mills, 8 How. Pr. 377 : Biglow v. Sanders. 22 Barb. 147. 

Reg. «. Allen. C. & M. 295. State rt. Murray. 15 Me. 100; Reg. v. 

Waters, 12 Cox C. C. 390; Reg. r. Bootie, 2 Burr. 864; Reg. t/. 

Stokes, 5 C. & P. 148 ; Com. v. Filburn. 119 Mass. 297 ; State v. 

Beebe, 13 Kas. S39'> Steere «. Field. 2 Mason, 326. 
In statute. Howard v. Blackford. Pen. 777. 
warrant. In statute. Anderson v. Hampton, i B. & Aid. 310. 

any instrument, arms or other things oaloiilated to aid his . 

In statute. Hughes v. State, i Eng. 131. 

negligent . In statute. Adams v. Turrentine, 8 I red. 147. 

from any eause whatever. In bill of lading. Oxiey 0. SL 

Louis, etc., R. Co., 65 Mo. 629. 

Com. V. Hite, 6 Leigh, 558 (29 Am. Dec. 227, note). 

Jordan v. Pollock, 14 Ga. 145; Jackson v. Catlin. 2 Johns. 248 ; Clark 
«. Gifford, 10 Wend 310; Bramam v. Bingham, 26 N. Y. 483; White 
V. Bailey, 14 Conn. 270; State Bk. v. Evans, 3 Green (L.) 155 (28 
Am. Dec. 400). 

priT}leges. In statute. City of Elk Point v. Vaughn, i Da- 
kota, 113. 

In insurance policy, Perkins 0. Ins. Co., 2 El. & Bl. 322. 

Smith V. Forest, 49 N. H. 230. 

In statute. King «/. Wade, 1 B. & Ad. 873; Com. v Simonds. 11 Gray, 
306 



ESTABLISH. 124 EST A TE. 

ESTABLISH — Continued. 

and regtilate domestic relations. In statute, Davenport v. 

Caldwell. 10 S. C. 317. 

and regulate markets. In city charter, Ketchuni o. City of 

Buffalo, 14 N. Y. 356; Beekman?/. People, 27 Barb. 260; Peoples. 
Lowber, 28 Barb. 65 ; Waitman 0. Philadelphia, 33 Pa. St. 202. 

or set up- a newspaper or printing press. In covenant, An- 



derson V, Faulconer, 30 Miss. 145. 

ESTABLISHED. Gibson v. Kirk, i Q. B. 855. 

In statute. Com. v, Simonds, 11 Gray, 306; Weigel v, Betz, 18 La. 
Ann. 49. 

by a jury. In statute. Fitch v, Tafft, 126 Mass. 504. 

or usual place of business. In statute, Rhodes v. Salem, 

etc., Tp. Co., 98 Mass 95. 

ESTATE. Cutts v. Com., 2 Mass. 284; Deering v. Tucker, 55 Me. 284 ; Jackson 

V, Parker, 9 Cow. 73; Hunter v. Husted, Busb. (Eq.) 141 ; U. S. v, 
Crookshank, i Edw. 233 ; Jackson v, Robins, 16 Johns. 537 ; State 
V, Bishop, 15 Me. 122. 

In deed. Doe v. Evans, 9 Ad. & Ell. 719. 

In indictment. People?/. Hall, 19 Cal. 425. 

In statute, Harrison v. Lamar, 33 Ark. 824; Friedman v, Macy, 17 
Cal. 226; Smithdeal v. Smith, 64 N. C. 52; Filliterz/. Phippard, 11 
Q. B. 348; Freedman v. Goodwin, 1 McAllister, 148. 

In will, Sanderson v, T^obson, 7 C. B. 100; Allison v. Chancy, 63 
Mo. 283; Mabley v, Stainback, i Martin. 75 (i Am. Dec. 545);Tur- 
bett V, Turbett, 3 Yeates, 187 (2 Am. Dec. 369) ; Vanderzee v, Van- 
derzee, 36 N. Y. 231 ; Terry v, Wiggans, 47 N. Y. 513 ; Jackson v. 
Merrill, 6 Johns. 185 ; Archer v. Deneale, i Peters, 585 ; Doe v. 
Lean, i Q. B. 229 ; Hamilton v, Buckmaster, L. R., 3 Eq. Cas. 325 ; 
OToole V. Browne, 3 El. & Bl. 572 ; Kellogg v, Blair, 6 Mete 322 ; 
Tracy v, Kilbourn, 3 Cush. 557 ; Hammond v, Hammond, 8 Gill & 
J. 436 > Hart V, White, 26 Vt. 260; Arnold v. Lincoln, 8 R. I. 384; 
Countess of Bridgewater v, Duke of Bolton, 6 Mod. 106 ; Jackson 
V. Delaney, 11 Johns. 365; Brewer v, Brightman, 4 McCord, 60; 
Andrews?/. Bmmfield, 32 Miss. 107 ; Crostwaight v, Hutchinson, 2 
Bibb. 407 ; Norris v, Clark, 10 N. J. (Eq.) 51 ; Den v, Snitcher, 14 
N. J. (Eq.) 53; Vick v, Sueter, 3 El. A Bl. 233 ; New Orleans v, 
Stewart, 28 La. Ann. 181 ; Jacks v. Bridewell, 51 Miss. 881 ; Roths- 
child V, Hatch, 54 Miss. 554. 

and eflEbcts. In statute, Sayer v. Defaur, 11 Q. B. 335 ; Att'y- 

Gen. V. Browning, 8 H L. Cas. 243. 

In will, Perceval v, Perceval, L. R., 9 Eq. Cas. 387. 

in settlement. Mechanics', etc., Bk's. Appeal, 31 Conn. 69. 

of inheritance or freehold. In statute. Inhabitants of Ips- 
wich V. Inhabitants of Topsfield, 5 Mete. 350. 

real and personal. In will. Austin v. Rutland, etc., R. Co., 45 

Vt. 215. 

all my . In will, Donovan v, Donovan, 4 Harr. (Del.) 177 ; 

Godfrey?/. Humphrey, 18 Pick. 537. 

any in fee or for life. In statute. Olcott v. Wood, 14 N. Y. 3a. 

feotory . In will. Brainerd v, Cowdrey, 16 Conn. i. 

interested in the . In statute. Shields v, Ashley, 16 Mo. 471. 



ESTATE. 



125 



EVICTION. 



^STATB — Continued. 

real- 



— . In wilL Knight v, Selby, 3 Man. A G. 95. 

residue of my . In will. Den v. Drew, 14 N. J. (L.) 68. 

hereditaments and premises. In deed, Dayrell v, Hoare, 12 



ESTIMATE. 
ESTIMATED. 



Ad. & Ell. 369. 

other . In statute. Atwater v. Inhabitants of Woodbridge, 6 

Conn. 223 (16 Am. Dec. 46). 

In verdict. Roddy v. McGetrick. 49 Ala. 159. 

In contract. Heald v. Cooper, 8 Me. 32. 

cash value. In insurance policy. Elliott v. Lycoming Ins. Co., 

66 Pa. St. 22 (5 Am. Rep. 323). 

ESTIMATION, containing by . In contract. Stebbins v. Bddy, 4 Mason, 414. 

Frost «/. Saratoga Mut. Ins. Co., 5 Demo, 154; Leicester z/. Rehobeth, 
4 Mass. 180; Owen v. Bartholomew, 9 Pick. 520; Van Rensselear 
V. Kearney, 1 1 How. 297 ; Water's Appeal, 35 Pa. St. 523 ; Sparrow 
V. Kingman, I N. Y. 242 ; Armfield v. Moore, Busb. (L.) 157; 
Dezell V. Odell, 3 Hill. 215. 

In statute. Thompson z/. Corpstein, 52 Cal. 653 ; Shepherd v. Hawley, 
4 Oreg. 206 ; Roberts v. Barnes, 27 Wis. 422 ; Walters v. Glats, 29 
Iowa, 437; Lyman v. Gibson, 18 Pick. 426. 

Bacchus V. Moreau. 4 La. Ann. 313 ; Lebeaii v. Trudeau, 10 La. Ann. 
164; Conery v. Webb, 12 La. Ann. 282. 

Queen v: Redpath, 10 Mod. 152; Railroad Co. v. Metcalfe, 4 Mete. 211 ; 
Ham V. Tichenor, 3 Mon.^196. 

In bill of particulars. Hayes z/. Wilson, 105 Mass. 21. 

In bond. Com. v. Ross. 6 S. & R. 427. 

In indictment. Com. v. Lakeman, 4 Cush. 597. 

In plea, Bryant/. Bates, 15 111. 87. 

In statute. Dano v. R. Co., 27 Ark. 564. 

In will. Barnaby v. Tessell, L. R., 11 Eq. Cas. 363. 

In statute. Smith v. State, 43 Ala. 345. 

of the award. In order. Reeves v. McGregor, 9 Ad. A Ell. 577; 

In deed. Marsick v. Webber, 2 El. & Bl. 637. 

of the triaL In statute. Hardy 2/. Featherstonhaugh, 10 B. & 

S, 629; L. R., 4 Q. B. 725. 

abide the . In statute, Jones v. Williams, L. R., 8 Q. B. 280; 

Stooke V. Taylor. 5 Q. B. Div. 569. 

follow the . In statute. Field v. R. Co., 3 Ex. Div. 26 ; Myers 

V. Defries. 5 Ex. Div. 15 ; Id. 180. 

Charter Ins. Co. v. Colt, 20 Wall. 560, 

declaration. In statute. Doe v. Roe, 2 Ad. & Ell. 11. 

of them. In bond. Besorc v. Potter. 12 S. & R. 158. 

person. In statute. Washington z/. State, 17 Wis. 148. 

son. In will. Surtees v. Surtees, L. R., 12 Eq. Cas. 400. 

such overseer. In statute. King v. Share, 3 Q. B. 37. 

— ^ way fitted for the voyage. In charter-party. Von Lingen v. 
Davidson, i Fed. Rep. 178. 

in oase. In constitution. Steele v. Shields, 49 Md. 304. 

SVICnOK. Upton z/. Townsend, 17 C. B. 30; Royce v. Guggenheim, 106 Mass. 



SVADING. 
EVENT. 



EVICTION. 



Z26 



EXCEED. 



EVICTION » Continued. 

aoi ; Mitchell v. Warner. 5 Conn. 497; Succession of Coxe, 15 La. 
Ann. 514; Reasoner v. Edmondson, 5 Ind. 393; Pendleton v. 
Dyett, 4 Cow. 581. 

McWilliams v, Rodgers, 56 Ala. 93 ; Schloss v. Creditors, 31 Cal. 201; 
Nelson v, Johnson, 18 Ind. 329; Harvey v. Smith, 17 Ind. 272. 

In statute. Re Comstock, 8 Ben. 235. 

agaiUBt himself. In constitution. State v. Ober, 52 N. H. 459 

(13 Am. Dec. 88). 

in support thereof. In statute. State v. Halliday, 60 Mo. 596 

of aocmtraot. In statute. Mullett v. Hutchinson, 7 B. &C. 



640 ; Blackwell v. McNaughton, i Q. B. 128. 

of debt. In statute. Gaines v. Craig, 24 Ark. 477. 

oiroumstantial . People v. Kennedy, 32 N. Y. 141. 

pnina fiude . Emmons v. Westfield Bk., 97 Mass. 230. 

of debt. In statute. New York Life Ins. Co. v. Beebe. 7 N. Y 

364. 

EVIDENT. proof is In constitution. Re Alexander, 59 Mo. 598; ex parte 

Acree, 63 Ala. 234; ex parte Foster, 5 Tex.(App.) 625 (32 Am. Rep. 

577.) 
EVIDENTLY. • unsuitable. In statute. Thayer tl Horner, 1 1 Mete. 104. 

EX. parte. Lincoln v. Cook, 3 111. 61. 

parte matema. Banta v. Demarest, 24 N. J. (L.; 431. 

parte paterna. Banta v. Demarest, 24 N. J. (L.) 431 . 

post itoto. In constitution. Townsend v. Townsend, Peck, i 

(14 Am. Dec. 722); Bell v. Perkins, Peck. 261 (14 Am. Dec. 745) ; 
re Gabenz, 45 Cal. 430; People v. Mortimer, 46 Cal. 114; U. S. v. 
Hughes, 8 Ben. 29; Coles v. County of Madison, Breese, 154(12 
Am. Dec. 161); Dickinson z/. Dickinson, 3 Murphy, 327 (9 Am. Dec 
608); Dash V, Van Kleck, 7 Johns. 477(5 Am. Dec. 291); Turner 
V. State, 40 Ala. 21; Walston v. Com., 16 B. Mon. .37; Strong v. 
State, I Blackf. 193 ; Den. v. Van Riper, 16 N. J. (L.) 7 ; Boston v. 
Cummins, 16 Ga. 102 ; Cummings v. State, 4 Wall. 277 ; U. S. w. 
Hall, 2 Wash. C. C. 366; Woart v. Winnick, 3 N. H. 473; Fletcher 
V. Peck, 6 Crancb, 87 ; Shepherd v. People, 25 N. Y. 403. See 
note by Mr. Justice Johnson in 2 Peters, 681 ; Calder v. Ball. 3 
Dallas, 386 ; Gut v. State, 9 Wall. 35; Locke z/. New Orleans, 4 
Wall. 172; Carpenter v. State, 17 How. 456; Municipality v. 
Wheeler, 10 La. Ann. 145 ; Perry's Case, 3 Gratt. 632 ; Fisher v, 
Cockerill, 5 Men. 132; Railroad v. Dickerson, 17 R Mon. 176; State 
z/. Willis, 66 Mo. 131 ; O'Donohue v. Aiken, 2 Duv. 479; ex parte 
Bethurum, 66 Mo. 545; Evans V.Montgomery, 4 W. & S. 218; Ori- 
ental Bk. 7/. Freeze, 18 Me. 100; Mechanics' Bank's Appeal, 31 
Conn. 63 ; Lord v. Chadbourne, 42 Me. 429; Albee v. May, 2 Paine, 
74 ; B.iy «. Gage, 36 Barb. 477 ; Strong v. State, i Blackf. 193 ; 
Turner 0. State, 40 Ala. 21; Ross' Case, 2 Pick, 165; Rand v. Com., 

9 Gratt, 738; Hartung v. People, 22 N. Y. 95. 

EXAMINATIOE'. In statute. Queen v. Inhabitants, 11 Q. B. 63 ; 9 Ad. & Ell. 837 ; 

10 Ad. & Ell. 679. 

on oath. In statute. Laughran v. Kelly, 8 Cush. 199. 

did not . In statute. Re Earl of Harrmgton, 2 El. & Bl. 676. 



EXCEPT. 



127 



EXECUTED. 



aa hereinalter excepted. In grant, Greenleaf v, Barth, 6 



Peters. 302. 
the briok fiustory. In statute, Allen v, Scott, 21 Pick. 25 (32 



Am. Dec. 238). 

EXCEPTING. Barnes v, Burt, 38 Conn. S4i. 

In deed, Stockwell z/. Couillard, 129 Mass. 231. 

EXCEPTION. In statute, Quary v, Gambert. 32 Cal. 304. 

omel treatment or outrages. In statute, Tourne v, Tourne, 

9 La. Ann. 452 ; Armant v. Her Husband, 4 La. Ann. 137. 

In ptea. Starch v. Clarke, 4 B. & Ad. 1 1 5. 

bail. In constitution. Ex parte Duncan, 53 Cal. 410. 

fines. In constitution, Pervear v. Com., 5 Wall. 475 ; Blyden- 

burgh V, Mills, 39 Conn. 484. 

weight. In statute. Avelard v, Lucas, 5 C. P. Div. 211. 



SXdiUDING. 



Cass V. Thompson, i N. H. 65 (8 Am. Dec. 36); Com. v. Clark, 14 Gray, 
367 ; BufTum v, Murry, 3 Mason, 481. 

and oonvey. In power of attorney. Long v. Fuller, 21 Wis. 122. 

second of first unpaid. 22 How. 96. 

liquor. In statute. Queen v, Lancashire, 7 El. & Bl. 840. 

In constitution, Portland Bk. v. Apthorp, 12 Mass. 252; Oliver v. 
Washington Mills. 1 1 Allen, 268 ; Scholey v. Rew, 23 Wall. 345 ; 
Pacific Ins. Co. v. Soule, 7 Wall. 433. 

In statute, Patrick v, Faulke, 45 Mo. 312. 

In insurance policy. Palmer v, Warren Ins. Co., 1 Story, 365. 

In statute, Washburn v. Gould, 3 Story C. C. 122. 

jurisdiction. Com. v, 0*Connell, 8 Gray, 464. 

of a bond. In verdict. Walker v, Gibbs, 2 Dafl. 211 ; i Yeates, 

255. 
of costs. In statute, Gordon v, Ross. 2 Cal. 157. 

power. In statute. Park Soc. v. City of Hartford, 47 Conn. 89. 

right. In charter, Sloan v. State, 8 Black f. 361. 

EXdiUSIVELY. In statute, Reg. v, Manchester, 16 Q. B. 450. 

neglect. In statute. Flanders v, Sherman, 18 Wis. 593; Stop^ 

penfeldt v, Milwaukee, etc., R. Co., 29 Wis. 690; Johnson v, Eldred, 
13 Wis. 487 ; SUfTord v, McMillan, 25 Wis. $66. 

lawful . In statute. Queen v, Haryey, L. R.. i C. C. R. 285. 

In statute, Waleman v, Merrill, 4 Vroom, 378 ; Kemble v, Harris, 7 
Vroom, 526; Scott v, Dow, 2 Green, 350. 

Bagley v, McMickle, 9 Cal. 430; State z/. Young, 23 Minn. 551. 

In declarcUion, Walbridge v, Arnold, 21 Conn. 425. 

In deed, Stuart v, Dutton, 39 111. 91. 

In statute. Den. v. Young, 7 Halst. 300 ; Calhoun v, Buflington, 25 
Mo. 443 ; Little %', Dodge, 32 Ark. 453. 

and delivered. In contract, Faunce v. Ins. Co., loi Mass. 279. 

execution . In statute. Smith v. Young. 12 N. J. (L.). 300. 



EXECUTE. 
EXECUTED. 



has- 
te be 



B. 818. 



unto. Bagley v, McMickle, 9 Cal. 340. 
in due form of law. In writ, Magnay v. Monger, 4 Q. 



EXECUTING. Z2S EXHIBITS. 



SXECUTDTO* Drewe v. Lamson, ii Ad. & £11. 529. 

any such deed. In statute. Ellis v, McCormack, 10 B. & S. 90. 

iSXECUnOff. Tiernan v, Fenimere, 17 Ohio. 545. 

In statute. Ins. Co. v, Halleck, 6 Wall. 556. 

of the instrument. Freeman v. Ellison, 37 Mich. 459. 

or other legal prooesa. In statute. Re Fanshaw, L. R., 11 Eq. 

Cas. 615. 

in upon any judgment. In statute. Re Lilley. 14 Q. R 404. 

on their . In deed. Dingwall v. Edwards, 4 B. & S. 758. 

proof of . Freeman v. Ellison, 37 Mich. 459. 

EXECUTIVE. In statute. U. S. v. Barnabo, 14 Blatchf. 74, 

authority. Com. v. Hall, 9 Gray, 267. 

• 

officer. Thorne v. San Francisco, 4 Cal. 127. 

or ministerial offioers. In statute. Cook v. College of Louis- 
ville. 9 Bush, 541 . 

EXECUTOR. Sheldon v. Smith, 97 Mass. 34 ; Firmey v. Barnes, 97 Mass. 401. 

In promissory note. Rittenhouse ?/. Ammerman, 64 Mo. 196. 

EXECUTORY. contract. Farrington v. Tennessee, 5 Otto, 683. 

EXECUTORS . In will. Phillips v. Stewart, 59 Mo. 491. 

administrators and assigns. In insurance policy, 26 N. Y. 253. 

my . In will. Noel v. Harvey, 29 Miss. 72. 

EXECUTORSHIP. expenses. In will. Sharp v. Lush, 10 Ch. Div. 468. 

EXECUTORY. devise. In statute. Edwards v. Bibb, 54 Ala. 475. 

trust. Egerton ta, Brownlow, 4 H. L. Cas. 210. 

EXECUTRIX. In will. Owen v. Ellis. 64 Mo. 77. 



:}*:m:Aii9\ 



damages. Chiles v. Drake, 2 Mete. 147 ; Fay v. Parfcer, 53 N. 

H. 342 ; Bixby v. Dunlap, 56 N. H. 456; Fry v. Bennett, i Abb. Pr. 
304 ; Roth V. Eppy, 80 111. 283. 

— flrom taxation. In statute. S. H. Co. y. St. Louis, 62 Mo. 135. 



♦;«:Hui: 



l)^.^ Zf3 » ' 



EXEMPTED. In statute. Atfy-Gen. v. Fitzjohn, 2 Hurl. & N. 473; State v. Forshner, 

43 N. H. 90. 

flrom taxation of every kind. In hospital charter. Sheehan ». 

Good Samaritan Hospital, 50 Mo. 155. 

wholly . In statute. East London Water Works v. Overseers, 

2 El. & El. 455. 
TION* Glassinger v. State, 24 Ohio St. 206. 

In statute. Long v. Converse, i Otto, 112. 
LdSE. In deed. Winter v. Williams, 4 Ad. & El. 251. 

EXERdTOR. The Phebe. Ware, 267. 

EXHIBIT. Reg. v. Webb, 2 C. & K. 938. 

the books. In statute. Broner v. Cotheal, 10 Barb. 216. 

IITED. In statute. Newell v. State, 2 Conn. 38 ; Hammett ir. Starkweather* 
47 Conn. 440. 

legally . In statute. Pfeiffer v. Suss, 73 Mo. 2. 

UtjlmG. the bill. In plea. Rees v. Morgan, 5 B. & Ad. 1039. 

tmON. public . In statute. Com. v. Gee, 6 Cush. 179. 

KITS. Lake v. Skinner, i Jac. & W. 9; Brown v. Redwyne, 16 Ga, 67. 



r^:«:ii! 



[>».«:ii 



:»:«:! ■ 



,}#:«:ii 



EXISTENCE. 



Z29 



EXPLOSION. 



EXISTENCE, 
EXUenHNQ. 



corporate 



In statute. Hurt «/. Salisbury, 55 Mo. 310. 



SXFSLLBD. 
SXFENSB. 



In insurance poitcy. Gee v, Cheshire Ins. Co., 55 N. H. 65. 

oreditors. In statute. Fox v, Edwards. 38 Iowa, 21. 

estates. In statute State v. Diveling, 66 Mo. 375. 

laws. In statute. Laurie 7k State, 5 Ind. 625. 

railroad corporations. In statute. Indianapolis, etc., R. Co., 

V. Blackman, 63 III. 117. 

in the suit. In statute,^ Blalce v. Dove. 7 Hurl. & N. 472. 

Ludlam v. Ludlam, 26 N. Y. 356. 

Johnson v, McCune, 27 Mo. 171. 

In deed, Vallet/. Clemens, 18 Mo. 486. 

estates. In statute. Lawrence v. Bayard. 7 Paige, 70 ; Under- 

hill V. Saratoga, etc., R. Co., 20 Barb. 455. 

In contract. Bold v, Ray nor, .1 M. & W. 343. 

to arrive. In contract, Gorrisson v. Perrin, 2 C. B. (N. S.) 681. 

Leathers v, Greenacre, 53 Me. 573. 

Perry v, Fitzhowe, 8 Q. B. 757. 

half the , In contract. Snow t^. Johnson, i Minn. 48. 

In par tfter skip agreement, Fisher v, Goddard, i Black, 506 ; 8 Peters, 

355. 
In pica, Richardson v, Clasen, 10 Q. B. 756. 

In statute, Gurnee v, Maloney, 38 Cal. 85; W h ite house z/. R.Co., L. R., 
5 Ex. 12; Dashiell v. Mayor, 45 Md. 615. 

In will. Re Haines, 4 Halst Ch. 506. 

in relation to highways. In statute. Queen v. Heath, 6 B. & 

S. 587. 

incurred. In statute, Bayley v. Wilkinson, 16 C. B. (N. S.) 190. 

necessarily incurred. In statute. Queen v. Mayor, 5 Q. B. 862. 

of administration. In statute, Lester v, Mathews, 56 Ga. 655. 

actual that may appertain to the goods themselves. In con-- 

tract, Foster z/. Goddard, i Clifi. 158. 

costs and . In order. Ball v. Vason, 56 Ga. 264. 

proper and legal . In statute, Sullivan v. Mining Co., 39 Cal. 

467. 
In statute, Webster v. Peck, 31 Conn. 495. 

EXPEBIMEirr. In patent. Hills v. London Gas-light Co., 5 Hurl. & N. 314. 

Jones V, Tucker, 41 N. H. 547 ; Page v, Parker, 40 N. H. 47 ; State v. 
Phair, 48Vt. 366; Heald v. Thing, 45 Me. 392; Mitchell z/. State, 
58 Ala. 417 ; Young v, 0*Neil, 57 Ala. 567 ; Dole v. Johnson, 50 N 
H. 452 ; Clark v. Rockland Water Co., 52 Me. 68 ; Sweetze v 
Lowell, 33 Me. 446. 

and terminate. In lease. Bowman v. Foot, 29 Conn. 331. 

Spencer v. Colt, 89 Pa. St. 314. 

In fire insurance policy, 7 Wall. 44 ; Stanley v. Ins. Co., L. R., 3 Ex. 
71 ; United Ins. Co. v, Foote, 22 Ohio St. 340. 

loss occasioned by the of a steam-boiler. In insurance policy. 

St. John V, Am. Mut. F. A M. Ins, Co., 11 N. Y. 516. 
17 



EXFSBT. 



BXFTBS. 



EXPIiOSION. 



EXPLOSIONS. 



130 



EXTERNAL. 



fSXPIiOSIOKS. caused \Bf lightning or . In fire policy. Briggs v, N. A. & M. 

Ins. Co., 53 N. Y. 446. 

preparationB and oompositions. In statute. Bliss v. Lilley, 



3 B. & S. 129. 

any other subetanoe. In insurance policy. Washburn 

Miami Valley Ins. Co., 2 Fed. Rep. 633. 

EXFOBTATIOK. Forman v, Peaslee, 1 1 Month. L. R. (N. S.) 273. 

In statu^. Barrett v. Stockton R. Co., 2 Man. & G. 312. 

designed fbr . In statute. Com. v. King, i Whart. 44S. 

shipped for . Stockton R. Co. v, Barrett i CI. & F. 590. 



V. 



SXIPORTED. 



EXPOSED. 



from the port. In statute. Muller v. Baldwin, L. R., 9 Q. B. 

457. 
In constitution. Crandall v. State, 6 Wall. 35 ; Almy v. State, 24 How. 
169; State ?/. Turner, 5 Harr. 501; ex parte Martin, 7 Ncv. 140; 
re Wong Yung Quy, 2 Fed. Rep. 624. 

Reg. V. Webb, 2 C. & K. 938. 

to sale. In statute. Eberle v. Mehrback, 55 N. Y. 682 ; Adams' 

Ex. Co. V, Schlessiqger, 75 Pa. St. 246. 

to ii\jiiry. In statute. Treat's Appeal, 40 Conn. 288. 

to the danger of fire. In statute. Safford v. Boston, etc., R. 



Co., 103 Mass. 584. 
willftdly and wantonly 



himself to any nnneoessary danger 



EXPOSUBE. 



or periL In insurance policy. Schneider v. Provident Ins. Co., 24 
Wis. 28. 

to unneoessary danger, hasard or perilous adventure. In 

accident insurance policy. Sawtelle v. Railway Pass. Ass. Co., 1 5 
Blatchf. 216. 

In insurance policy. ChafTee v. Cattaraugus Mut. Ins. Co., 18 N. Y. 

376. 
or implied. In city charter. McGafBn v. City of Cohoes, 74 N. 



Y. 387 C30 Am. Rep. 387). 

trust. Brown v. Cheney, 56 Barb. 635. 
tmderstanding. Spence v. Spence, 17 Wis. 448. 



EXTEND. 



EXPBESSED. In statute. Hartford v. R. Co., 16 Q. B. 442- 

shall be in the title. In constitution. People v. Hills, 36 N. Y. 

449; Durkee v. City of Janesville, 26 Wis. 697. 

In statute, Reg. v. Poor Law Commrs., 9 Q. B. 292. 

named. In statute, Taylor v, Nicholls, 6 M. & W. 95. 

withheld. In statute. Lightfoot v. Bass, 2 Tenn. Ch. 677. 

Clement v, Dickey, i Paine, 385. 

In statute. Ralston v. Smith, 11 H. L. Cas. 223 ; South Boston R. 
Co. V, Middlesex R. Co., 121 Mass. 485. 

In statute. Brooke ?/. Clarke, i B. & Aid. 402. 

In re Wedgwood Coal & Iron Co., 26 W. R. 442. 

alteration. In lease. Perry v. Davis, 3 C. B. (N. S.) 776. 

parts of the premises. Indeed. Green v, Eales, 2 Q. k^. 225. 

violence. In insurance policy. Citizens' Ins. Co. v. Glasgow, 

9 Mo. 411. 

violent and accidental means. In accident insurance policy. 



EXTENSION. 
EXTEBNAIi. 



Bayless v. Travelers' Ins. Co., 14 Blatchf. 144. 



EXTING UISHMENT. 



131 



FACTORY. 



FACTOR. 



FACTOBY. 



EXTINGniSHMENT. Taylor v, Harrington, 4 McCord, 96 (24 Am. Dec. 710). 

of the State debt. In constitution. Auditor^jeneral v. State 

Treasurer, 45 Mich. 161. 

EXTOBSlVlBLY. In indictment. Leeman v. State, 35 Ark. 439. 

EXTOBT. Com. v. O'Brien, 12 Gush. 90. 

EXTOBTION. Com. v. Bagley, 7 Pick. 279 ; Collier v. State, 5s Ala. 125 ; People v. 

Whaley, 6 Cow. 661 ; Com. v. Mitchell, 3 Bush, 39; Williams ?'. 
State, 2 Sneed, 160. 

In statute. U. S. v. Wartz, 3 Sawy. 474. 

EXTBA. work. In contract. Escott v. White, 10 Bush, 174. 

EXTBAOBDINABY. oare. Toledo, etc., R. Co. v. Baddeley, 54 111. 19. 

eharges. In statute. Waddington v. London Union, i El., B. & 

El. 387. 

expenditures. In constitution. Walker v. State, 12 S. C. 200. 

ezpenees. In statute. Aveland v. Lucas, $ C. P. Div. 211. 

expenses inoorred in case of riot. In statute. King v. 

Justices, 7 B. & C. 10. 

marine risk. In charter-party. Leary v. U. S., 14 Wall. 607. 

oooasions. In comtitution. Whiteman t^. Wilmington, etc., R. 

Co., 2 Harr. (Del.) 514 (33 Am. Dec. 411). 

traffic. In statute. Aveland v. Lucas, 5 C. P. Div. 3ii. 

services. In statute. Holman v. Sims, 39 Ala. 709 ; Allen v. 

Martin, 36 Ala. 330. 

of the judgment. Osgood v. Bringolf, 32 Iowa, 265. 

of the work. In contract. Martin v. Thrasher, 40 Vt. 460. 

meet the witnesses to . In constitution. State v. Mc< 

O'Blenis, 24 Mo. 403; Johnson v. State, 2 Yerg. 57 ; Miller v. State. 
25 Wis. 387. 

on the . Woodcock v. Bennet, i Cow. 711 (13 Am. Dec. 569). 

In note. Springfield Bk. v. Merrttt, 14 Mass. 322. 

In statute. South Eastern R. Co. v. Comm'rs, 5 Q. B. Div. 218. 

proper and convenience Ibr the conveyance and accommo- 
dation of passengers. In statute. Eastern Union R. Co. v. R. 
Co., 2 El. & Bl. 542. 

Drake v, Cockroft, 4 E. D. Smith, 34 ; Lawrence v. Wright, 2 Duer, 

673. 
Baring 7/. Corrie, 2 B. & Aid. 148: Graham v, Duckwall, 8 Bush, 12 ; 
Higginsz/. Moore, 34 N. Y. 418; Ladd v. Arkell, 37 N. Y. (S. C.) 
35: Hopkirk V. Bell, 3 Cranch. 454; Winne v. Hammond, 37 IlL 
99 ; Taylor v. Wells, 3 Watts, 65 ; Slack v. Tucker, 23 Wall. 321. 

In deed. Mahew v. Hardesty. 8 Md. 479. 

In insurance policy. Liebenstein v. Ins. Co., 45 111. 301. 

In statute. Kent v. Astley, 10 B. & S. 802 ; Redgrove v. Lee, L. R., 
9 Q. B. 363;, Blackford ?/. State, 11 Ohio, 327 ; Atwood v. DeForest, 
19 Conn. 513; Palmer's Ship Co. v. Clayton, L. R, 4 Q. B. 209; 
Kent V. Astley, L. R., 5 Q. B. 19; Whymper v. Harvey, 18 C. B. 
(N. S.) 248. 

prices. In note. Whipple v. Levitt. 2 Mason, 89. 

chair . In insurance policy. Liebenstein v. Ins. Co., 45 111. 301. 

part of a used solely for the manufacture of goods. In statute. 

Taylor v. Hicks, 12 C. B. (N. S.) 160. 



FACTS. 



132 



FALSEL Y. 



FAcnra. 



FACUIiTY. 



— oonstitatiiig a cause of aotioiL In statute. Clay Co. v, Simon- 
son, I Dakota, 403. 

of phyno. In statute. Regents v» Williams, 9 Gill & J. 365 



FAILED. 



FAILS. 



(31 Am. Dec. 721). 
In statute. Com. v. McDonald, 5 Cush. 368. 

to aot. In statute. Howard v. McDairmid, 26 Ark. 106. 

Mayer v. Hermann, 10 Blatchf. 257. 

to obtain relief. In statute. Queen v. Bedminster Union, i O. 

B. Div. 504. 
to Bue. In statute. Shepherd v. St. Louis, etc., R. Co., 3 Mo. 



FAIRBANKS. 



(App.) 553. 

— of iBSiie. Patterson v. Ellis, 11 Wend. 259: Tongue v. Nutwell. 
13 Md. 415; Dumond v, Stringham, 26 Barb. 104. 

— to execute proceoe. In statute, Andrews v. Keep, 38 Ala. 31 5. 

— abridgment. Story v, Holcombe, 4 McLean, 306 ; Folsom 1'. 
Marsh, 2 Story C. C. 100. 

— average crop. Wright v. Morris, 1 5 Ark, 444. 

— oreditore. In statute. Gorham v. Witherby, 7 Q. B. 497. 

— legal trial In band. Simpkins v. Oakley, i Blackf. 537. 

— patent. On scales. Fairbanks v. Jacobus, 14 Blatchf. 338. 



Warnock v. Thomas, 48 Ala. 463. 

In affidavit. Lawrence v. Finch, 17 N. J. (Eq.) 234. 

wrought. In deed, Griffiths v, Rigby, i Hurl. & N. 238. 

equitably and . In statute. Satcher v. Satcher, 41 Ala. 26. 



full 



and credit. In constitution, Christmas v. Russell, 5 Wall. 



290; Green v. Van Buskirk, 7 Wall. 139. 
In statute. Caperton v. Ballard, 14 Wall. 238. 

ULLY. perform. In bond. Bk. v. Adams, 12 Pick. 303. 

FALDA (Sp.) Fossat's Case, 2 Wall. 673. 



FALL. 



State V. Haddocks, 2 Hawks, 461. 

through. Norris v. Maitland, 9 Phila. 7. 

if building shall . In insurance policy. Firemen's Fire Ins. Co. 

V, Con. Rodeph Sholom, 80 111. 559 ; Brenner x>. Ins. Co., 51 Cal. 103 
(21 Am. Rep." 703). 

this . In contract. Weltner v. Riggs, 3 W. Va. 445. 

King V. Harvey, 2 B. & C. 264. 

bank notes. In statute. Kirby v. State, i Ohio St. 187. 

entry. In statute. Reg. v, Dewitt, 2 C. & K. 905 ; Reg. -v. 

Brown, 2 C. & K. 504 ; Smith v. State, 5 Humph, 163. 
forged and counterfeited. In indictment. U. S. v. Howell, 1 1 



Wall. 432. 

— or bogus checka In statute. Pierce v. People, 81 111. 98. 

— or fraudulent practice or appearance. In statute. U. S. ?/. 
A Cargo of Sugar, 3 Sawy. 48. 

— rumor in appearance well founded. In statute. Com. v. 



FALSELY. 



Smith, I Whart. Diff. 826. 

— statement. In statute. Reg. v. Dewitt, 2 C. & K. 905. 

— swearing. In insuramce policy. Maher v. Hibernia Ins. Co., 67 
N. Y. 283. 

— token or writing. In statute. State v. Saunders, 63 Mo. 482. 

— and fraudulently. In statute. Reg. v. Bent, i Den. C. C. 1 57. 



FAMILIES. 



133 



FARMERS. 



FAWnTiTKS. 
FAMILY. 



In wilL Burt v, Hillyer, 14 Eq. Cas. 160. 

Nixon V, Nanney, i Q. B. 747; Kitchell v. Burgwin, 21 111. 40; Wilson 
V, Cochran, 31 Tex. 677 ; Spencer v, Spencer, 11 Paige, 159 ; Regan 
V, Zebb, 28 Ohio St. 483. 

In insurance policy. Poor v, Humboldt Ins. Co., 125 Mass. 274 ; 2 Fed. 
Rep. 432. 

In statute, Ellington v, Moore, 17 Mo. 424; State v. Slater, 22 Mo. 
464 ; Whaley v, Whaley, 50 Mo. 577; Kain z/. Fisher, 6 N. Y. 597 ; 
Weed V, Dayton, 40 Conn. 293; Weber v. Short, 55 Ala. 311; 
Turner v. Whittier, 40 Ala. 530; Town of Cheshire f . Town of 
Burlington, 31 Conn. 326 ; Person v, DeHart, 3 N. J. (L.)48i ; Strawn 
V, Strawn, 53 III. 263; Bradley v, Rodelsberger, 3 S. C. 226; Cox 
V, Staflford, 14 How. Pr. 519; Howards. Marshall, 48 Tex. 471; White- 
head z/. Nichelson, 48 Tex. 517; Johnson r/. Fletcher, 54 Miss. 628. 

In will, Mercier v, M. R. F. S. & G. R. R., 54 Mo. 506 ; Hall v. 
Stephens, 65 Mo. 671 ; Bates v, Denson, 128 Mass. 334; Pigget/. 
Clarke, 3 Ch. Div. 672 ; re Hutchinson. 8 Ch. Div. 541 ; Lambe v. 
Fames, L. R., 6 Ch. App. 597 ; Snow v. Lead, L. R., 9 Eq. Cas. 622; 
re Jeffrey, L. R., 14 Eq. Cas. 136; Dominick v. Sayre, 3 Sandf. 555; 
Wallace v, McMicken, 2 Disney, 564; Bowditch v, Andrew, 8 Allen, 
339 ; Smith v. Wildman, 37 Conn. 384. 

library. In statute, Robinson's Case, 3 Abb. Pr. 466. 

physioiaxi. In insurance policy. Reed v. Piedmont, etc., Ins. 

Co., 58 Mo. 421 ; Price v. Phoenix, etc., Ins. Co., 17 Minn. 497 (10 
Am. Rep. 166). 

any neighborhood or . In statute, Noe v. People, 39 111. 96. 

having a for which he provides. In statute, Cantrell v, Con- 
nor, 6 Daly, 224. 

maintenance of my 

234. 
marry and have a — 

member of the 



In will, Andrews v, Andrews, 7 Heisk. 



FABHEB. 
FABMEBS. 



— In will, Spencer V. Spencer, 11 Paige, 159. 

. In statute. Brown v, Witt, 19 Wend. 475 ; 
Mayer v. Griffin, 7 Wis. 82. 

out of the . In will, Pierson v, DeHart, 3 N. J. (L.) 481. 

perBOn of his . In statute. Wade v, Jones, 20 Mo. 75. 

person having a . In statute, Keiffer v, Barney, 31 Ala. 192. 

In deed, Doolittle v, Blakesley, 4 Day, 26$ (4 Am. Dec. 218); Auburn 
Congregational Church v. Walker, 124 Mass. 71. 

In plea, Wilson v, Bramhall, i Younge & J. 2. 

In statute, Finlay z/. Langston, 12 Mo. 121. 

In will, Wheeler v, Randall, 6 Mete. 532 ; Aldrich v, Gaskell, 10 
Cush. 158. 

crossing. In statute, Wheeler v, Rochester, etc., R. Co.. 12 

Barb. 227. 

on which A lives. In will, Kimball v, SchofT, 40 N. H. 190. 

homestead . Taylor v, Mixter, 1 1 Pick. 347. 

produce of a . In statute. Mayor v, Davis, 6 W. & S. 279. 

In statute. Queen v, Cleworth, 4 B. & S. 927. 

selling the produce of their fiurms. In statute, Tnutees of 

Rochester z/. Pettinger, 17 Wend, 265. 



FARMING. 



134 



FELONY. 



FABHING. 



FAST. 



FAULT. 



FAULTS. 



FAVOE. 



FEAB. 



interests. In statute, Voorhees^/. Patterson, 20 Kas. 555. 

used exdusively fbr purposes. In statute. Gillette v. City of 

Hartford, 31 Conn. 351. 

Holwood V, Holwood, 7 H. L. Cas. 728. 

estate. In wilL Lewis v. Smith, 9 N. Y. 502. 

train. Indianapolis, etc., R. Co. v, Peyton. 76 111. 340. 

In statute, Cotheal v. Cotheal, 40 N. Y. 405. 

School District v. Boston, etc., R. Co., 102 Mass. 555; Chicago. 

etc., R. Co. V, Ryan, 70 111. 211 ; Whitney v. Boardman, 118 Mass. 

242. 
In contrctct, London, etc., R. Co. v. Grace, 2 C. B. (N. S.) 555. 
In contract, Pettitt v, Mitchell, 4 Man. & G. 838. 

all . In contract, Whitney v, Boardman, 1 18 Mass. 242. 

with all . In contract. Smith v, Richards, 13 Pet. 26 ; Wood v. 

Hobbs, 2 Q. B. Div. 331 ; Shepherd v. Kain, 5 B. & Aid. 240. 
in of suoh validity. In statute. Bridge Prop, v, Hoboken 

Co., I Wall. 116. 
Hollingsworth v, McDonald, 2 H. & J. 230 (3 Am. Dec. 545). 
Wendell v, Crandall, i N. Y. 491 Patterson v, Ellis, 1 1 Wend. 259. 
In deed, Jecks v, Taussig, 45 Mo. 167 ; Cool v, Higgins, 23 N. J. (Eq.) 

308. 
Ju plea, Jordan v. Record, 70 Me. 529. 

In statute. Den v, Clark, i N. J. (L.) 340. 

fbrm. De Peyster v, Michael, 6 N . Y. 467. 

Ikrm rent. De Peyster v, Michael, 6 N. Y. 467. 

simple. Haynes?/. Bowen,42 Vt. 686; Brackettt/. Redlon, 54 

Me. 426 \ Stinson v. Rouse, 52 Me. 261 ; Jecko v, Taussig, 45 Mo.. 
167. 

a reasonable attorney's . In statute. Draper v. Draper, 29 

Mo. 13. 

oonveyanoe in . In decree. Smith v, Armstrong, 25 Wis. 520. 

water and take proper care of. In statute. South, etc., Ala- 
bama, etc., R. Co. V, Henlein, 52 Ala. 606. 

Jeflferson Co. v, Johnson, 64 111. 149 ; Tillman v. Wood, 58 Ala. 578. 
In statute. Camp v. Bates, 13 Conn, i ; McPhellis v, Morrill, 66 Me. 
i«3- 

one thousand . In contract. Brown v. Brooks, 25 Pa. St. 210. 

In statute, Howarth v, Tollemache, 4 Man. & G. 431. 

case. Henkinst^. Guerss, 12 East, 247, 2 Camp. 408 ; Fletchers. 

Peck, 6 Cranch, 87 ; Lord v. Veazie. 8 How. 255 ; Smith v. Junction 
R. Co., 29 Ind. 545. 

laborer. Hall v. Johnson. 3 H. & C. 590. 

editor. In libel, Leyman v, Latimer, 3 Ex. Div. 353. 

assaulter. In statute. Com. v, Sanborn, 14 Gray, 393. 

FELONIOUSLY. In indictment. State v, Weldon, 70 Mo. 574 ; Wemzorpfin v. State. 

7 Blackf. 186 ; Carder?/. State, 17 Ind. 307 ; State v. Card, 34 N- 
H. 510; U. S. V, Forrest, 3 Cranch C. C. 60. 

In statute. Com. v. Adams, 127 Mass. 15. 

U. S. V, Staats, 8 How. 45 ; BruR^nier v. U. S.. i Dakota, 5. 

In indictment. Baker 7/. State, 34 Ark. 480. 



FEED. 



FEIGNED. 



FELLOW. 

FELON. 

FELONIOUS. 



FEIONY. 



FELON V. 135 F/£> UCIAR \\ 

— Continued. 

In statute. Shay v. People, 22 N. Y. 317 ; Fassett v. Smith, 23 N. Y. 
252 ; State v, Knapp, 6 Conn. 415 (16 Am. Dec. 68); People v. Park, 
41 N. Y. 21 ; State v, Benton, 71 Mo. 288; Rex v, Powell, 2 B. & 
Ad. 75; Campbell v. Queen, 11 Q. B. 812; Wilson v. State, 1 
Wis. 185. 

shall be guilty of . In statute, Williams v. Queen, 7 Q. B. 252. 

heirs. In statute, Beall v, Harwood, 2 H. & J. 167 (3 Am. Dec. 

532). 
Allen V, Tobias, 77 III. 169; Goodrich v, Jones, 2 Hill, 142; Murray 
V. Van Dcrlyn, 24 Wis. 67. 

In deed, Scofield v. Lock wood, 35 Conn. 425. 

In statute. Com. %*, King, 13 Mete. 115; Estes v, Atlantic, etc., R. Co., 
63 Me. 308; Munson v. Town of Derby, 37 Conn. 310. 

or hedge. In statute. Merivale v. Trustees, 9 B. & S. 7^. 

pole. Baker v, Hope, 49 Cal. 598. 

nmxiiiig into the water. In statute. Lamb v. Hicks, 1 1 Mete. 

496. 
water . In statute. Lamb v. Hicks, 1 1 Mete. 496. 

In statute, Ellis v, Amison, i B. & C. 71. 

FSBMENTED. drinkfl. In statute. State v, Lemp, 16 Mo. 389. 

or distilled liquor. In statute. Beach v. State, 8 Mo. 497. 

liquor. In statute, U. S. v, Dooley, 21 Int. Rev. Rec. 115. 

ale, strong beer or beer. Nevin v, Ladue, 3 Denio, 437. 

People V, R. Co., 35 Cal. 606. 

Chapelle v. Wells, 4 Mart. (N. S.) 426; State v, Hudson Co., 3 Zabr. 
206; State z/. Wilson, 42 Me. 9; Att'y-Gen. v, Boston, 123 Mass. 
460; Hartford Bridge Co. v. Ferry Co., 29 Conn. 221 ; Aikin v. 
Western R. Co., 30 Barb. 305, 20 N. Y. 370; Att'y-Gen. v, Boston, 
123 Mass. 460; Alexandria, etc., Ferry Co. v, Wisch, 73 Mo. 656. 

In statute. State v, Hudson, 23 N. J. (L.) 206 ; Parrot v. City of Law- 
rence, 2 Dillon, 332 ; Mayor v. New England Trans. Co., 14 Blatchf. 
165 ; Parrott v. City of Lawrence, 2 Dill. 332. 

IPEBBYMAK. In statute, Clarke v. State, 2 McCord, 47 (13 Am. Dec. 47). 
jrJiW. oopies. In contract. Myers v. Gross, 59 111. 436. 

J^lCriTlOUS. suit. Henkinsv. Guerss, 12 East, 247, 2 Camp. 408; Fletcher 

V Peck, 6 Cranch, 87 ; Lord v, Veazie, 8 How. 255 ; Smith v. 
Junction R. Co., 29 Ind. 546. 

oommissum. In constitution, Ducloslange v. Ross, 3 La. Ann. 

432 ; Gaines v. Chew, 2 How. 619. 

oapaoity. In statute. Chapman v, Forsyth, 2 How. 202 ; PVouty 

V. Swift, 51 N. Y. 594; Roberts 2/. Prosser, 53 N. Y. 260; Treadwell 
V, Hollo way, 46 Cal. 547 ; Flagg v, Ely, i Edm. 206 ; Commercial 
Bk. t/. Buckner, 2 La. Ann. 1023; Stoll v. King, 8 How. Pr. 298; 
Sutton V, De Camp. 4 Abb. Pr. (N. S.) 483; Republic of Mexico v, 
Anangoiz, 5 Duer, 634; Holbrook v, Horner, 6 How. Pr. 86; 
Shudder z/.Schiels, 17 How. Pr. 420; Turner v. Thompson, 2 Abb. 
Pr. 444; Ostell V, Burgh, 24 How. Pr. 274; Chaine v. Coffin. 17 
Abb. Pr. 441; Argus v, Dunscomb, 8 How. Pr. 14; Wolfe v, 
Brower, 5 Robt. 601 ; Noble v. Prescott, 4 E. D. Smith, 139; Buss- 
ing V, Thompson, 1 5 How. Pr. 97 ; McBurney v, Martin, 6 Robt. 



FIDUCIARY. 



136 



FINAL. 



FmUdABY — Continued. 

502 ; Clark v, Pickney, $0 Barb. 226 ; Marris v, Ingram, 13 Ch. Div. 
339; Morse v. City of Lowell, 7 Mete. 152; Haynian v. Pond, 7 
Mete. 329. 

oharaoter. In statute. Jones v. Knox. 46 Ala. 53 ; Woolsey v. 

Cade, 54 Ala. 379; Woodward v. Towne, 127 Mass. 41 ; Anioskeag 
Manufg Co. v, Barnes, 49 N. H. 312; Hardenbrook v, Collson, 24 
Hun, 475; Lemcke v. Booth, 47 Mo. 385 (4 Am. Rep. 326): Banning 
V. Bleakley, 27 La. Ann. 257 (21 Am. Rep. 554); Whitaker v. Chap- 
man, 3 Lans. 15s; i^ Seymour, i Ben. 348; re Kimball, 6 Blatchf. 
292; Desobry v. Tete, 31 La Ann. 809 (33 Am. Rep. 332); Johns v, 
Russell, 44 Ga. 460; Curtis z^. Waring, 92 Pa. St 104; Kaufman v. 
Alexander, 53 Tex. 562; Barber v. Sterling. 68 N. Y. 273 ; Groveri/. 
Clinton, 8 Bank. Reg. 312; Owsley v, Cohen, 15 Bank. Reg. 489 ; 
Keime v. Graff, 17 Bank. Reg. 319; Neal z/. Clark, 9s U. S. 704; re 
« Smith, 18 Bank. Reg. 24 ; Jockirsch v, Tousey, 51 Tex. 129 : Heffren 

^ V. Jayne, 39 Ind. 463 (13 Am. Rep. 281 ); Flanagan v. Pearson. 42 

Tex. I (19 Am. Rep. 40): Cronan v. Cotting, 104 Mass. 245 (6 Am. 
Rep. 232); Green v. Chilton, 57 Miss. $98 (34 Am. Rep. 483); Hen- 
nequin v. Clews, 76 N. Y. 427 (33 Am. Rep. 641); Harvey v. Devereux 
72 N. Y. 463. 

State V. McMinn. 81 N. C. 585. 

In statute. Com. v, Sampson, 97 Mass. 407 ; Com. v, Josselyn, 97 
Mass. 411. 

in the . In statute, Sargent v, Ludlow, 42 Vt. 726. 



FIELD. 



FIELDS. 
FIQHT. 



FIIJKG. 



FILL. 
TILLED, 

FILTH. 
FINAL. 



and fenced lands. In deed, Hearst v, Pujal, 44 Cal. 230. 



State V. Gladden, 73 N. C. 150. 

In pleading. Hunter v. Caldwell, 10 Q. B. 69. 

In statute, Oats v. Wells, 28 Ark. 245 ; Erwin v, McGuire, 44 Ala. 505; 
Gorham v. Summers, 25 Minn. 81. 

In statute, Johnson t/. Hodges, 65 Mo. 589; Engelman tf. State, 1 
Ind. 91 ; Fulkersonz/. Houts, 55 Mo. 301; King v. Wade, i R & Ad. 
873; Pfuman v, Henkel, i Bradw. 145; Reed ?/. Acton, 120 Mass. 
130; Ware T/. Johnson, 66 Mo. 661 ; Gorham z/. Summers, 25 Minn. 18. 

in open court. In indictment, McKenzie v. State, 24 Ark. 637. 

among the . In return to writ, Thompson v, Washoe Co., 7 

Nev. 83. 
Lamson v. Falls, 6 Ind. 309 ; Pinders v. Yeager, 29 Iowa, 368 ; Bishtip 

V, Cook, 13 Barb. 326; Naylor v. Moody, 2 Black f. 247. 

or reg^tration. In statute. Re Butlin, L. R., 8 Ch. App. 722. 

a prescription. Ray v. Jones, 61 Ga. 505. 

firame house in with brick. In insurance policy. Fowler v. 

iEtna Ins. Co., 6 Cow. 673 (16 Am. Dec. 460). 

In statute, Reg. v. Wood, 5 El. & Bl. 55. 

In statute, Reg. v. Hunt, 6 El. <k BI. 412. 

and oonolnsiTe. In statute. Re Mayor of New York. 49 N. 

Y. 1 50 ; re Houghton, 42 Cal. 37 : State v. Shields, 49 Md. 304. 

and without exception or appeal. In agreement, Williams 



V, Danziger, 91 Pa. St. 232. 

— disposition. In statute. Ex parte Russell, 13 Wall. 664; re 
Brightman, 14 Blatchf. 130. 

— decree. In bond. Jordan z/. Agawam Woolen Co., 106 Mass. S7K 



FINAL. 137 FINE. 

• '~~ ^^'""^"'~^^~^"^^'~'" 

Continued. 

In statute, Hatchett v, Milner, 44 Ala. 224; Carswell v, Spencer, 44 
Ala. 205 ; Betts v, Davis, i Cal. 134; Hallock v. Jaudon, 34 Cal. 167; 
Strickler v. Tracy, 66 Mo. 465; Wood v, Corman, 56 Ala. 283 ; Bon- 
durant v. Apperson, -4 Mete. (Ky.) 30 ; Kehoe v. Blenthen, 10 Nev. 
445; Barry V. Briggs, 22 Mich. 201; Kelly v. Stanberry, 13 Ohio, 421. 

judgment. Ir statute, Witlenbury v. U. S., 6 Wall. 819; 

Moses V. Mayor, 15 Wall. 387; Moore v. Robbins, 18 Wall. 
588; The Lucille, 19 Wall. 73; Thomson v. Dean, 7 Wall. 342; 
Railroad Co. v, Soutter, 2 Wall. 440; Humiston v, Stainthorp, 
2 Wall. 106. Amos v. Smith. 16 Peiers. 303: De Krafft z^. Barney, 
2 Black, 712; Holmes v. Tennison, 13 Peters, 540; Weston v. City 
Council, 2 Peters, 419; Houston v, Moore, 3 Wheat. 433; O'Dowd 
V, Russell, 14 Wall. 402 ; Wells z/. McGregor, 13 Wall. 188; Rankin 
V. State, II Wall. 380; Mannz'. Lally, 17 Wall. 14; Ayres v. Carver, 
17 How. 591 ; Wheeler v. Haines, 13 Wall. 51 ; Atherton v. Fowler, 
I Otto. 145 ; Bronson v. La Crosse R. Co., i Wall. 405 ; Railroad 
Co. V, Swasey. 23 Wall. 405 ; St. Clair Co. v, Lovington, 18 Wall. 
628; Hall V.' Vanier. 7 Neb. 397 ; Shegogg v. Perkins, 34 Ark. 117 ; 
Bradford v, Bradley, 37 Ala. 453 ; Tabor v. Lawrence, 53 Ala. 543 ; 
Wallace 2/. Middlebrook, 28 Conn. 464; Phelps v. Pease, 39 Cal. 
582: Collins t'. Wagoner, 20 Wis. 48; Bariield v, Impson, 2 Miss. 
326; Porter v, U. S., 2 Paine, 315 ; Scott v. Hore. i Hughes, 164. 

determinatioii of the rights of the parties. In statute, 

Swarthout v, Curtis, 4 N. Y. 41 $. 

disposition of the cause. In statute. Re Brightman, 14 Blatchf. 



130. 
dividend. In statute, Jackson v. Magee, 3 Q. B. 47. 

hearing. In statute, Osborn v, Osborn, 5 Fed. Rep; 389. 

hearing or trial. In statute, Akerly v, Vilas, 2 Biss. 1 10 ; 24 

Wis. 165; I Dill. 463, 355, 357; Vannevar v, Bryant, 21 Wall. 41 ; 
Ins. Co. V, Dunn, 19 Wall. 214; Bryant v. Rich, 106 Mass. 193; 
Beeny 7/. Irick, 22 Gratt. 484; Minuett v, Milwaukee, etc., R. Co., 
3 Dill. 460. 

passage. In constitution. State v, Buckley, 54 Ala. 612. 

port of discharge. In contract, U. S. v. Barker, 5 Mason, 404. 

process. In statute. Amis v. Smith, 16 Peters, 303. 

order, 7 Bush, 62$; Railroad Qo,v, Punnett, 18 B. Mon. 48; 

Turner v, Browder, 18 R Mon. 826 ; Applegate v, Applegate, 4 
Mete. 236; Helm v. Stout, 7 Bush, 625; Bondurant v, Apperson, 4 
Mete. 32. 

order affboting a substantial right. In statute, Ballston Spa 

Bk. V, Marine Bk., 18 Wis. 491 ; re Fleming's Petition, 16 Wis. 70; 
Collins V, Case, 25 Wis. 653. 

reoovery. In statute, Jannes v, Pangborn, 6 Allen, 243 ; Fisk 

V, Gray, 100 Mass. 191. 

decision shall be . In constitution, McGee v, Mathis, 2 1 Ark. 41 . 

FEEf AUCaY. reoover. In statute, Fisk v. Gray, 100 Mass. 193. 

to help» In contract, Ladd v. Patten, 66 Me. 97. 

In offer of reward. Kincaid v, Eaton, 98 Mass. 139. 

McGregor v. Comstock, 17 N. Y. 162 ; De Peyster v, Michael, 6 N. 
Y. 467; Hanscomb v. Russel, 1 1 Gray, 373 ; Fein v, U. S., i Wyom- 
ing, 247. 

18 



FINE, 



138 



FIRST. 



l*£NliS. 



FiNisHnra 



PINE — ConUnued. 

In contract. Laubenheimer v, Mann, 19 Wis. 520. 

day. Andrew v. Whitlock, 52 N. Y. 40. 

penalty or for&itiire. . In statute, Ison, in re, 6 Oregon, 469; 

Common Council v, Fairchild, i Ind. 315. 

In statute, U. S. v. Simms, i Cranch, 252. 

penalties or fbrHoitures. In statute. Re Brittingham, 5 Fed. 

Rep. 191. 

In contract, Hyannis Savings Bank v. Moors, 120 Mass. 459. 

when house is . In order. Robbins v, BIodgett,.i2i Mass. 279. 

In statute, Hardcastle v, Jones, 3 B. & S. 160. 

works. In statute. Hpwarth z/. Coles, 12 C. B. (N. S.) 139. 

In bill of lading. New Orleans, etc., Ins. Co. v. R. Co., 20 La. Ann. 
302 ; Levy v, Pontchartrain R. Co., 23 La. Ann. 477 ; York Co. v. 
Central R. Co., 3 Wall. 107 ; Michigan, etc., R. Co. v, Heaton, 37 
Ind. 148 ; Grey v. Mobile Trade ,Co., 55 Ala. 387 ; Bank of Ken- 
tucky V, Adams' Ex. Co., 93 U. S. 174; Erie R. Co. v, Lockwood. 
28 Ohio St. 358 ; Condict v. Grand Trunk R. Co., 54 N. Y. 500 ; 
Lamb v, Camden, etc., R. Co., 46 N. Y. 271 ; Stedman v. Western 
Trans. Co., 48 Barb. 97 ; The City of Norwich, 3 Ben. 575 ; Swindler 
V, Billiard, 2 Rich. (S. C.) 216. 

In insurance policy, Everett v, London Assurance, 19 C. B. (N. S.) 
127 ; Austin v, Drewe, 6 Taunt. 436; Holt's N# P. 126; Busk v. Ass. 
Co., 2 B. & Aid. 80; Waters V. Merchants' Ins. Co., 11 Pet. 213; 
Gordon v, Remmington, 1 Camp. 123; Brady v. North-western Ins. 
Co., II Mich. 425; Kenniston v, Merimac Ins. Co., 14 N. H. 341 : 
Babcock v. Montgomery Co. Ins. Co., 4 N. Y. 326; Scripture v. 
Lowell, etc., Ins. Co., 10 Cush. 356; Greenwald v, Ins. Co., 3 Phila. 
323 ; Ha3n¥ard v, Liverpool, etc., Ins. Co., 2 Abb. App. Dec. 349 ; 
City Fire Ins. Co. v, Corlies, 21 Wend. 367 ; Marsden v, Ins. Co., i 
Harr. & Ruth. 53. 

and all other nnaToidable accidents. In bill of lading. Col- 
ton V, Cleveland, etc., R. Co., 67 Pa. St. 211. 

and collisions on the lakes and rivers and on the Welland 



canal. In bill of lading. Barter v, Wheeler, 49 N. H. 9. 

by lightning. In insurance policy, Babcock v, Montgomery 



FIBE-AB1C 



etc., Ins. Co., 6 Barb. 637 ; 4 N. Y. 326. 

dangers of the river and • In bill of lading. Grey v. Mobile 

Trade Co., 55 Ala. 387. 

loss by . In bill of lading, Steinwegv. Erie R. R., 43 N. Y. 123. 

In insurance policy. Ins, Co. v. Trans. Co.. 12 Wall. 194; Washburn 
V, Farmers' Ins. Co., 2 Fed. Rep. 304. 

In statute, Atwood v. State, 53 Ala. 509 ; Evins v. State, 46 Ala. 88. 

cotton warehouse. In deed, Vaughan v, Matlock, 23 Ark. 10. 

FIBE-WOBKS. In insurance poUcy, Jones v. Firemen's Fund Ins. Co., 51 N. Y. 318; 

Steinbach v, Lafayette Ins. Co., 54 N. Y. 90. 

In statute. Bliss v, Lilley, 3 B. & S. 129. 

In indictment. Shepherd v. State, 54 Ind. 25. 

Ryder 7/. Wilcox, 103 Mass. 29. 

believes. In statute, Thompson v. Whitee, 4 S. & R. 137. 



FIBM. 

JTRMTiY. 

PIBST. 



State V. Treasurer, 41 Mo. 17. 



FIRST. 



139 



FIXED. 



— Continued. 

In statute, Atfy-Gen. v. Sefton, 11 H. L. Cas. 257; 3 H. & C. 1024. 
In will. Everett v. Carr, 59 Me. 325, 

boat. Johnson v, ChamberSi 12 Ind. 112. 

cousins. InwilL Re Parker, 14 Ch. Div. 529. 

day of the term. In statute. Re Burt, 5 R & C. 669. 

draw. In contract i Trimble v. Lord. 5 Dana, 518. 

had and obtained. In statute. Com. v, Camac, i S. & R. 89. 

inventor. Stead v. Williams. 7 Man. & G. 837. 

male heir. In will Winter v, Perratt, 5 B. & C. 59 ; 6 M. & 

G. 379- 
privilege. In deed, Hapgood 2/. Brown, 102 Mass. 451. 

son. In will, Parker v, Tootal, 11 H. L. Cas. 143. 

term. In statute, Higley v. Burrow, 49 Mo. 103 ; John v. State, 

I Head. 49. 
tried. In statute. Merchants' Bk. v. Wheeler, 13 Blatchf. 218 : 



:pibcaIs. 



Ki:ii 



\Qt. 



FFFTXNQ. 

FnnB. 



FIXED. 



Warner v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 13 Blatchf. 231 ; Scott v. Clinton, 

etc., R. Co., 6 Biss. 529. 
In statute, Folger v. U. S., 13 Ct. of CI. 93. 
agent. In statute. State v. Dubuclet, 27 La. Ann. 29. 

In statute. Caswell v. Johnson, 58 Me. 164. 

known as river fish. In statute. Woodhouse v. Etheredge, L. 

R., 6 C. P. 570. 

. In statute. Bridger v. Richardson, 8 B. & C. 568. 



HuntT/. Hill, I Whart. 131; Tinicum Fishing Co. v. Carter, 61 Pa. 
St. 39 ; Cobb V. Davenport, 33 N. J. (L.) 223. 

In statute. Hodgson v. Little. 14 C. B. (N. S.) 120; 16 C. B. (N. S.) 
207. 

mill dam. In statute, Garnett v. Backhouse, L. R., 3 Q. B. 30. 

place* In statute, Bennett v, Boggs, Bald. C. C. 60; Hunt v. 

Hunt, I Whart. 131. 

and proper regulations. In statute. De Forest v. Redfield, 4 



Blatchf. 483. 

for distillation. In statute. U. S. v, Prussing, 2 Biss. 344. 

out. In statute. Att'y-Gen. v, Silleen, 2 H. & C. 623. 

any sum which they think . In statute, Baxendale v. Great 

Western R Co. 14 C. B. (N. S.) 24. 

on such conditions as may seem , 

9 Ad. & El. 783. 



In statute. Watson's Case, 



— up th9 premises. In cofitract. Pratt v, Paine, 119 Mass. 439. 

—days before the return day. In statute, O'Connor v. 
Towns, I Texas, 107. 

— the compensation. In constitution. Cricket v. State. 18 Ohio 



St. 9. 



and appointed. In statute. Hungerford Market v. City Steam- 



boat, 3 El. & EI. 373. 

— engine. In statute. Gore v. Comm'rs, L. R., 6 Q. B. 561. 

— ftimiture. In will. Buck v, Dawson, 2 Ad. A Ell. 40. 



FIXED. 



140 



FOR. 



FIZTUBS. 



FIXED — Continued. 

machinery. In ctmveyance. Alvord Carriaf^ Manf. Co. v. 

Gleason, 36 Conn. 86. 

on the first day of May next . In note. Durnford v. Patter- 
son, 7 Mart. 460 (12 Am. Dec. $14). 

Sheen v, Rickie, 5 M. & W. 175; Dudley 7/. Warde, Amb. 113; Elwes 
V, Mawe, 3 East, 38; Marshall v, Lloyd, 2 M. & W. 450; Hallen v. 
Runder, i Cr. M. & R. 266 ; Elliott v. Bishop. 10 Ex. $08; Winslow 
V, Merchants' Ins. Co., 4 Mete. 314 ; Ashman v, Williams. 8 Pick. 
402 : McCrea v. Central Nat. Be. 66 N. Y. 489 ; Potter v. Cromwell, 
40 N. Y. 287 : Vorhees v. McGinnis. 48 N. Y. 278 ; Tifft v. Horton. 
53 N. Y. 377 ; Walker v. Sherman. 20 Wend. 636 ; Farrar v, Chauf- 
fette, 5 Denio, 527 ; Providence Gas Co. v. Thurbcr, 2 R. I. 22 ; 
Teaff v. Hewitt. I Ohio St. 511; Prescott v. Wells, 3 Ney. 82; 
Pickerell t/. Carson. 8 Iowa, 544 ; State v, Bonham, 18 Ind. 231 ; 
Cafen v, Peckham. 35 Conn. 88 ; Russell v. Richards. 10 Me. 429 ; 
Miller v. Plumb, 6 Cow. 665 (16 Am. Dec. 457); Gray v. Holdship, 
17 S. & R. 413 (17 Am. Dec. 680); Merritt v. Judd. 14 Cal. 59; Win- 
slow V, Merchants* Ins. Co.. 4 Mete. 306 • Brown v. Lillie, 6 
Nev. 244; Prescott v. Wells, 3 Nev. 82. 

In deed. Wiltshear v. Cottrell, i EI. & Bl. 675. 

In statute. Baldwin v. Merrick, i Mo. (App.) 281. 

In will. Birch v. Dawson, 2 Ad. & Ell. 40. 

belonging to the Ailling mill and the carding machine. 

In agreement. Martin v. Cape. 28 N. Y. 180. 

for manufacturing purposes. In statute. Coddington v. 

Bebee. 5 Dutch. 550. 

or erections used for the purposes of trade. . In statute^ 



FirrUBES. 



FLAT. 
FLATS. 



FLEEINQ'. 



FLOATZNG*. 



Flanders v. Wood, 24 Wis. 571. 

In statute. Stannard v. Hubbard. 34 Conn. 370. 

Doane v. Wilcutt, 5 Gray, 335 ; Jones v. Janney, 8 W. & S. 442. 

firom justice. In statute. State v. Washburn. 48 Mo. 240. 

from justice. In statute. U. S. v. O'Brian. 3 Dill. 381 : U. S. 

V. Smith, 4 Day, 121. 

debt. In statute. People v. Wood. 71 N. Y. 371 ; Cooke v. 



FLOOR. 



Saratoga Springs, 23 Hun. 55. 

each . In t$isurance policy. New York Belting Co. v. Washing* 

ton Fire Ins. Co., 10 Bosw. 428. 

FLOOBCLOTH. canvas. In statute. Arthur «/. Cumming. i Otto. 362. 

FLOTSAM. /// statute. Palmer v. Rouse. 3 Hurl. & N. 507 ; Legge v. Boyd, i C. 



B.93. 



FLOWING. 

FLUID. 

FODDER. 

FOLLOW. 

FOLLOWING. 

FOOT. 

FOR. 



lands. In statute. Call v. Middlesex Comm'rs, 2 Gray, 235. 



Sickels V. Youngs. 3 Blatchf. 301. 

for cattle. In statute. 3 El. & EI. 238. 

the event. In statute. Parsons v. Tinkling. 2 C. P. Div. 1 19. 

In statute. State v. Warner, 34 Conn. 276. 

and end. Hunt v. Hunt, L. R., i P. & D. 209. 

of the mountain. In deed. Williston v. Morse, 10 Mete. 26. 



Stead V. Carey, i C. B. 510 ; Barlow v. Lee Congregational Soo, 8 
Allen, 463. 

In contract. Ready v. Sommer. 37 Wis. 265. 



FOR. 141 FOREIGN. 

FOB — Continued. 

at least thirty days. In statute, Whitaker 7/. Beach, 13 Kas. 

492. 
aoooxint of. In receipt. McKinstry v. Pearsall, 3 Johns. 319. 

ooUeotion. Bradstreet t/. Everson, 72 Pa. St. 124; Lowell Wire 

Fence Co. v, Sargent, 8 Allen, 192. 

giving. In statute. Lord Huntingtower v, Gardiner, i B. & C. 

300. 

hire or gain. In statute. Queen v. Tibbie. 4 El. & Bl. 888. 

his master. In statute. Queen v. Cullen, L. R., 2 C. C. R. 29. 

the largest sum that we oan reasonably obtain. Adams v. 

Foster, 5 Cush. 1 56. 

the purpose of sale. Com. v. Raymond, 97 Mass. $67. 

the time being. In statute. Groves v. Colby, 9 Ad. & Ell. 356. 

the use of. Stockbridge Iron Co. v. Hudson Iron Co., 107 Mass. 



324. 
POBBBAJtAirCE. In statute. Dry Dock Bk. v. Am. Life Ins. Co., 3 N. V. 344 ; 

Henry v. Thompson, Minor, 209. 

by . In indictment. State v, Blake, 39 Me. 322. 

by of. In contract, Fisher v, Hope, etc., Ins. Co., 40 N. Y. (S. 

C.) 291. 

sale. Peterson v. Hornblower, 33 Cal. 226 ; Patterson v. Tay- 
lor, 15 Fla. 336; Lanahan v. Sears, 12 Otto, 319. 

entry. Jarvis v. Hamilton, 16 Wis. 577 ; Bradley y. Iron Works, 



38 Cal. 676 ; Evill v. Connell, 2 Black f. 133 (18 Am. Dec. 138); State 
V. Bennett, Harp. (Law) 503 (18 Am. Dec. 663) ; Smith v. Laffery, 
27 Ark. 46 ; Burt v. State, 2 Tread. Consist. 489 ; Huffaker v. Bor- 
ing, 8 Ala. 87 ; Harrow v. Baker, 2 Greene, 201. 

In plea. Wilcox v. Conway, 115 Mass. 561* 

In statute. U. S. ?/. Gordon, 5 Blatchf. 25. 

break and enter. In statute. Tucker v. State, 18 Ohio, 308. 

pass. In statute. Camden Co. v. Fowler, 4 Zab. 205. 

resist. In statute. U. S. v. Batchelder, 2 Gall. 15. 

POKEC3LOSUBE. Jennings v. McKay. 19 Kas. 120; Goodman v. White, 26 Conn. 

322 ; Puffer V. Clark, 7 Allen, 85. 

proceedings. In policy of insurance, Colt v. Phoenix Fire Ins. 

Co., 54 N. Y. 595. 

FOKBIQK. = — bills. In note. Jones v. Fales. 4 Mass. 245. 

bills of lading. In statute. Buckner v, Finley, 2 Peters, 586. 

bonds. In will, Hull v. Hull, 4 Ch. Div. 97. 

dtisens* In constitution, Karraho v, Adams, i Dill. 344. 

corporation. In statute. Conn. Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Albert. 39 

Mo. 181 ; Bk. of Louisville v. Young, 37 Mo. 398 ; Baley v. Ohio, 
etc., Ins. Co., 12 Ohio St. 139; Oliver v, Liverpool, etc., Ins. Co., 
100 Mass. 531. 

dominion. In statute. Ex parte Brown, 5 B. & S. 281. 

fishing. In statute. U. S. v, Burdett, 2 Sumn. 336. 

govemment. Caddett v. Earl, 5 Ch. Div. 711. 

paupers. Opinion of the Judges, i Mete. 572. 



FOREIGN. 



142 



FORM. 



FOBEXGN — Continued. 

port. King V. Parks, 19 Johns. 375 ; The Eliza, 2 Gall. 4; The 

Lulu, I Abb. U. S. 191 ; 10 Wall 192 ; Negus v, Simpson, 99 Mass. 
388; The Sarah J. Weed. 2 Low. 555 ; The John Martin, 2 Abb. U. 
S. 172. 

states. In constitution, Cherokee Nation v. State* $ Peters, i. 

vsssaL In statute. The Catherine v, U. S.. 7 Cranch, 349; The 



FOBFEir. 



Sally, I Gall. 58 ; Fox v. The Loderaia, Crabbe. 271 ; The Mary 
Merritt, 2 Biss. 381. 

TOyage. In statute. The Lark, i Gall. 55 ; The Three Brothers, 

I Gall. 142 ; Taber v. U. S., i Story, i ; The Ocean Spray, 4 Saw- 
yer, 109. 

In statute, Spratti'. Spratt, i Peters, 349. 

Sawyer v, Arnold, i La. Ann. 815. 

In deed. Dennis v, Wilson, 107 Mass. 591 ; Clap v. Draper, 4 Mass. 266. 

In statute, Casey v, Hamed, 5 Iowa, i. 

In will. Vernon v, Wright, 7 H. L. Cas. 35. 

In contract, Betts v, Burch, 4 Hurl. A N. 519; Taylor v, Marcella, i 
Woods, 302: Esmond v. Van Benschoten, 12 Barb. 366; Richards 
V. Edict, 17 Barb. 260; Salters v. Rolph, 15 Abb. Pr. 273. 

In statute. Dimes v. Canal Co., 9 Q. B. 491 ; Day v, Frank, 127 Mass. 
497 ; Lynde v, Thompson, 2 Allen, 456. 

shall . In statute U. S. v. Distillery. 11 Blatchf. 255. 

FORFEITED. In statute. Walter v. Smith, 5 B. & Aid. 440. 

absolutely . In statute. Van Diemen's Land Co. v, Cockerell, 

I C. B. (N. S.) 744. 
FOBFETFUBE. U. S. v. Ulrici, 3 Dill. 532; Wakefield v, Johnson, 26 Ark. 506. 

In contract. Steams v, Barrett, i Pick. 443 (11 Am. Dec. 223). 

In statute, Howe v. Taylor, 6 Oregon, 284. 
FOBQE. State v. McKenzie, 42 Me. 392. 

In indictment, U. S. v. Watkins, 3 C ranch C. C. 496. 

In statute. Queen v. Rltson, L. R., i C. C. R. 203. 

FOBGEBT. Reg. v. Epps, 4 F. & F. 81 ; Reg. v. Ritson, L. R., i C. C. R. 200: Reg. 

V. CIoss, Dears. & B. 460 ; Reg. v. Hodgson, Dears. & B. 3 ; Reg. v. 
Chadwick, 4 M. & Rob. 545; Reg. v, Collins, 2 M. & Rob. S4S* 
Com. V, Sankey, 22 Pa. St. 390; Hill v. State, i 'Yerg. 76; Reg. v, 
Richards, Russ. A Ry. 193 ; Reg. v. Smith, 8 Cox C. C. 32 ; Reg. v. 
Moody, 9 Cox C. C. 166; Barnum v. State, 15 Ohio, 717: States. 
Kimball, 50 Me. 411 ; Com. v. Chandler, Thach. C. C. 187; Van 
Horn V, State, 5 Pike, 349 ; re Windsor. 6 B. & S. 522 ; People v. 
Ah Knoo, 28 Cal. 205 ; People v. Fitch, i Wend. 198 (19 Am. Dec. 
477); Reinhart v. State, 53 Ala. 467 ; Jones v. State, 50 Ala. 161 , 
Arnold v. Cost, 3 Gill. & J. 219 (22 Am. Dec. 302); Com. v. Bald- 
win, II Gray, 197; Mann v. People, 15 Hhn, 155; State v. Young, 
46 N. H. 266 ; Stete v, Phelps, 1 1 Vt. 1 16 (34 Am. Dec. 672). 

In treaty. Re Windsor, 6 B. & S. 522. 

Moorman v, Hoge, 2 Sawyer, 86. 

of the pavement. In statute. Reg. v. Eastern R. Co., 2 Q. R 577* 

in the presoribed. In statute, Kenlston v, Chesley, $2 N. H. 



FOBM. 



564. 
matter of 



In statute. U. S. v. Tuska, 14 Blatchf. 5. 



FORMAL. 143 FO UR TEEN. 



FOBMAIi. defect. In statute. Sill ?/. Queen, i El. & Bl. 554. 

FORMATilTJJSS, same . In statute. Remington v, Peckham, 10 R. I. 450. 

FORMATiTiY. In statute, Clarke v, Cochran, 3 Mart (La.) 361. 

FOBMER. dealinfl^. Lyon v. Johnson, 28 Conn. 2. 

FORMS. In statute. Koning v. Bayard, 2 Paine, 259. 

FORNICATIOir. Hood v. State, 56Ind. 263; Buchanan v. State, 55 Ala. 175; Terri- 
tory V, Whitcomb, i Montana, 359 ; Com. v. Call, 21 Pick. 509 ; 
State V. Lash, i Harris (N. J.), 3S0 (32 Am. Dec. 396). 

FORSWORN. In slander. Tomlinson v, Brattlebank, 4 B. & Ad. 632. 

FORTHWITH. Thomas v. Noakes, L. R.. 6 Eq. Cas. 521 ; Moffett v. Dickson, 3 Col. 

In award. Boyes v. Bluck, 13 C. B. 652. 

In contract, Roberts v. Brett, 11 H. L. Cas. 339; 20 C. B.(N. S.) 160 ; 
18 C. B. 574. 

* In Ifond. Bamforth v, Raddin, 14 Allen, 66. 

In insurance policy, Phillips v. Protection Ins. Co., 14 Mo. 167; Ed- 
wards V. Lycoming Ins. Co., 75 Pa. St. 378; Bennett v. Lycoming 
Ins. Co., 67 N. Y. 274. 

In statute. Burgess v, Boetefleur, 7 M. & G. 494 ; ex parte Lamb, 30 
W. R. 126; Jones v, Hutchinson, 10 C. B. 522 ; Spenceley v, Robin- 
son, 3 B. A C. 659 ; re Sillence, 7 Ch. Div. 240 ; Queen v. Robinson, 
12 Ad. A Ell. 673 ; Tennant v. Bell, 9 Q. B. 685 ; Queen* v. Herter. 
17 Q. B. 230; Grace v. Clinch, 4 Q. B. 606; Snooks v. Smith. 7 
Man. & G. 528 ; Reg. v. Isle of Ely, 5 El. & Bl. 490. 

as soon as may be. Adams v. Foster, 9 Cush. 1 56. 

FORWARD. St. Louis, K. C. &.N. R. R.'v. Piper, 13 Kas. 505. ' 

to . In bill of lading. Reed v. U. S. Express Co., 48 N. Y. 462 ; 

Kreuder v. Wolcott, i Hilt.. 223; Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. Franken- 
burg, 54 III. 88 ; Wall v. Holt. 26 Wis. 703. 

FORWARDED, to be . In bill of lading. Blossom v. Griffin, 13 N. Y. 569. 

FORWARDER. Roberts v. Turner, 12 Johns. 232. 

POUITD. In statute. Carter v. Young. 42 N. Y. (S. C.) 169 ; McNab v, Burnett, 

66 111. 157. 

and being without a oollar. In statute. Tower t^. Tower, 18 

Piek. 262. 

oommitting. In statute. Downing v, Capel, L. R, 2 C. P. 460 ; 

Griffiths V. Taylor, 2 C. P. Div. 194 ; Simmons v, Millingen, 2 C. 
B. 530. 

employed. In city ordinance. State v. Canton, 43 Mo. 48. 

in the posBession of. In statute. Reg. v, Drake, 22 Sol. Jour. 



4»7. 

— intoxicated. In statute. State v. Brownley, 25 Conn. 6. 



FOUNDED. in &ot. In instruction. State v, Morgan, 40 Conn. 44. 

on 9, bond, bill or note. In statute, Doan v. Holly, 26 Mo. 

186. 
onaoontraot. In statute, Wyman z/. Fahens, iii Mass. 80. 



Atty.-Gen. v. Master of School, 3 B. & Ad. 73. 

FOUBTEEN. days. In statute. Re Thompson A McLellan, 2 Biss. 166. 

days at least. In statute. Zoust v. Empsey, 4 B. & Aid. 522 ; 

Reg. V. Shropshire, 8 Ad. & Ell. 173; Mitchell v, Foster, 12 Ad. & 
Ell. 472 ; State v. Gasconade, 33 Mo. 102. 



FRACTION. 



144 



FREE, 



FBACmON. 

FBACfTIONAL. 
FBAME. 



PBAUD. 



of a day* Westbrook Man. Co. v. Grant, 60 Me. 88 (ir Am. 

Rep. 181). 

In siatutf, Swayne v, Vance, 28 Ark. 286. 

house filled in with brlok. In insurance policy. Fowler v. 

MXxidi Ins. Co., 7 Wend. 270. 

Com. V, Arnison, 15 S. & R. 127 (16 Am. Dec. 531) ; Pierce v, Emery, 
32 N. H. 484; Bridgeport v. New York, etc., R. Co.. 36 Conn. 255 ; 
Chicago R. Co. v. People, 73 111. 541 ; Slate v. Weatherby, 45 Mo. 
17; People V. Utica, etc., Ins. Co., 15 Johns 387; Com. v. Frank- 
fort, 13 Bush, 185 ; State v, Maine, etc., R. Co., 66 Me. 488; Curtis 
V, Leavitt, 15 N. Y. 9; Bank of Augusta v. Erie, 13 Pet. 519 ; Cali- 
ibmia State Tel. Co. v. Alia. Tel. Co., 22 Cal. 398. 

In deed. Morgan ?/. Louisiana^ 3 Otto, 217. 

property and . Railroad Co. v. County of Hamblin, 12 Otto, 276. 

Haycraft v. Creasy, 2 East, 92 ; Green v, Nixon, 23 Bpav. 530 ; Leh- 
man V, Shackleford, 50 Ala. 437 ; Kirby v, Ingersoll, i Harr. (Mich.) 
172 ; Chesterfield 7/. Janssen, 2 Ves. Sr. 155 ; Morrill v, Blackman, 
42 Conn. 324 ; Grider v, Clopton, 27 Ark. 245 ; Polhill v, Walter, 
3 B. & Ad. 123; Mock V, Pleasants, 34 Ark. 63; Van Arsdale v. 
Howard, 5 Ala. 596 ; Gardner v, Heartt, 3 Denio, 332 ; Allen ?/. 
Addington, 7 Wend. 9; Hamniatt v, Emnierson, 27 Me. 308. 

In statute, llathaway v, Johnson, 55 N. Y. 93 ; Classen v, Schoeman, 
80 111. 304; Shattuck V, Haworth, 91 Pa. St 449; Hennequin v. 
Clews, ^^ N. Y. 427 ; Broadnax v, Bradford, 50 Ala. 270 ; Smith ?•. 
Smith, 19 Wis. 104 ; Melvin v, Melvin, 72 N. C. 384; Neil v, Clark, 
5 Otto, 704 ; U. S. V. Rob Roy, i Woods, 43. 

attempt at . In insurance policy, Greib v, Ins. Co., i Dill. 443; 

Shaw V, Scottish Ins. Co., 1 Fed. Rep. 763. 



TBAUDUIJBNT. 



and void as against the assignee. In statute, BilHter 7'. 



Y oung, 6 El . & Bl. 10. 

contract. In statute, Benton v, Benton, i Day, iii. 

conveyance. /;/ statute. Ex parte Jordan, 9 Mete. 292. 

conveyance, gift, delivery or transfer. /// statute. Phelps 

?/. Hornstedt, L. R.. 8 Ex. 26. 

suppression. Blydenburgh v. Welsh, Baldw. 331 . 

FBAUDULEirrLY. Inplea, Behn v. Kemble, 7 C. B. (N. S.*) 265. 

In statute. Morgan v. State, 13 Fla. 671. 

stopped or stusipended, and not resumed payment. In stnt- 

ute. Re Thompson & McLellan, 2 Biss. 166. 

Pierce v. Milwaukee, etc., R. Co., 23 Wis. 391. 

flrom average. In insurance policy. Bargett v. Orient Ins. Co , 

3 Bosw. 385. 

from average, unless general. In insurance policy. Aranza- 



mendi v. Louisiana Ins. Co., 2 La. 432 (22 Am. Dec. 136). 

-^ land or tenement. /// statute. Dawson v. Robbins, 2 C. P. 
Div. 38. 

— ■' negpro. In statute. Ex parte George, i l\ P. Charlt. 80. 

^ of legacies or mortgages. In will. Doe v. Lean, i Q. B. 229. 

of particular average. In insurance policy. Hernandez z/. Sun 



Mut. Ins. Co., 6 Blatchf. 325. 

riding . On railroad pass, Bissell v. N. V. Cent. R. R., 25 N. 

Y. 442. 



y 



:i 



FREEHOLD. 



145 



FROM. 



V 



/ 



A -I : ft 



FBEELT. 






K 









w J 



FREEZING. 



FBIVOLOUS. 
FROM. 



In vftlL Matthews v. Matthews, L. R., 4 Eq. Cas. 278. 
estate. In will. Doe v. Tucker, 3 B. & Ad. 476. 

houeee. In wilL Bowen v. Barlow, L. R., 11 Eq. Cas. 454; L. 

R., 8 Ch. App. 171; 

State V. Ragland, 75 N. C. 12. 

In statute, Aaron v, State» 37 Ala. 106. 

of the oounty. Rex v, Johnson, 5 N. H. 520 (22 Am. Dec. 472). 

Dennis z/. Tarpenny, 20 Barb. 371 ; Merriam v» Harsen, 2 Barb. Ch. 232. 

In statute, Merriam v, Harsen, 2 Barb. Ch. 232. 

to be pooaoMod and ei^joyed. In will. Burkart v, Bucher, 2 

Binney, 455 (4 Am. Dec. 456) ; Lloyd v. Jackson, L. R., i Q. R 578 ; 
L. R., 2 Q. B 269 ; 7 B. & S. 683. 

In constitution, Burnham v. Laning, i Pa. Leg. Gaz. 41 1 ; 9 Phila. 

241. 
owner's riek . In bill of hiding. Read v, St Louis, etc., R. Co., 

60 Mo. 199; Wolff'. American Ex. Co., 43 Mo. 421. 

Palmer v, Gracie, 4 Wash. C. C. 1 10 ; Griggs v, Austin, 3 Pick. 20 ; 
The Zephyr, 3 Mason, 344. 

In Charter-party, Peisch v. Dickson, i Mason, 1 1 ; Gibbon v. Young, 
2 J. B. Moo. 224. 

In contract, Lidgett v, Perrin, 1 1 C. B. (N. S.) 362. 

In insurance policy, Dendon v, Ins. Co., L. R., 7 C. P. 341 ; Lord v. 
Neptune Ins. Co., 10 Gray, 109; Minturn v. Warren Ins. Co., 2 
Allen, 86. 

In statute, Allen v, Mackay, i Sprague, 219. 

as agreed. In charter-party, Kerford v. Mondel, 5 Hurl. & N. 

932. 

due or to grow due. In statute, Wilson v. Dickson, 2 B. & 

Aid. 14. 

money. Adams z/. O'Connor, 100 Mass. 517. 

on board. In insurance policy, Robinson v. Manufacturers' Ins. 



Co., I Mete. 146. 

on bill. In insurance policy. Field v. Citizens* Ins. Co., 1 1 Mo. 50. 

pursuit. In statute. People v. Pool. 27 Cal. 572. 

In contract, Ferris v, Comstock, 33 Conn. 513. 
In deed, Watson v. Atkins, 3 B. & Aid. 647. 



19 



Harris v. Social Manuf. Co., 9 R. I. 99. 

answer. Cottrell v, Cramer, 40 Wis. 555. 

Best!/. Polk, 18 Wall. 112; Gardner v. Collins, 3 Mason, 398; 2 Pet. 
58 ; Case v, Wildridge, 4 Ind. 51 ; Bonney v, Morrill, 52 Me. 252 ; 
Deyo V, Bleak ley, 24 Barb. 9; Simpson v, Luthwaite, 3 B. & Ad. 
231 ; Sands v, Lyon, 18 Conn. 27. 

In contract. Sheets v, Selden, 2 Wall. 177; Oatman v. Walker, 33 
Me. 67. 

In deed, Welles v. Iron Co., 48 N. H. 493. 

In insurance policy, Isaacs v, Ins. Co., L. R., 5 Ex. 296. 

In lease. Wilcox v. Wood, 9 Wend. 346 ; Atkins v. Sleeper, 7 Allen, 

487. 
In statute, Peebles v, Hannaford, 18 Me. 106; Smith t'. Helmer, 7 

Barb. 416; North-eastern R.Co.v. Payne, 8 Rich.(L.) 177; Tennes- 



FROM. 



146 



FULL 



VB/OiNL Continued. 

see, etc., R. Co. v, Adams, 3 Head, 596 ; Pittsburg v. Clay. 74 Pa. 
St. 259 ; Chesapeake, etc.. Canal Co. v. Key, 3 Cranch C. C. 599. 

In will, Ackland v, Lutley, 9 Ad. & £11. 879. 

and after. In statute. Com. v, Duane, i Binney, 601 (2 Am, 

Dec. 497) : Arnold v. U. S., 9 Cranch, 104. 

and after payment, and sulQeot thereto. In will. Bush v. 



VBONT. 

FRONTING. 

FBUCTXJS. 
FBUIT. 



FUCK. 
FUOmVR 

FUIiL. 



Sherrett, L. R., 2 Ch. App. 644. 

— and out. In statute. Blanford v. Morrison, 1 5 Q. B. 730. 

— a port. U. S. V. La Coste, 2 Mason, 129. 

— a street. Pittsburg v. Clay, 74 Pa. St. 259. 



place to place. Com. v. Cambridge, 7 Mass. 158; Com. v. 

Waters, 11 Gray, 81. 

six to eight n^eeks. In contract. Ashforth v, Bedford, L. R., 9 

C. P. 22. 

the day and year afbresaid. In statute, Wilkinson v. GastoD, 



9 Q. B. 137. 

— the person. In statute, Stegar v. State, 39 Ga. 583 ; People v. 
Beck, 21 Cal. 385. 

— the place of 



abode. In statute. King v. Justices, 2 B. & 
Aid. 204. 

— the port. In statute. U. S. v. La Coste, 2 Mason, 133. 

— thenceforth. In statute. Wilson v. State, 35 Ark. 428. 

— time to time. In statute. Bryan v, Arthur, 11 Ad. & Ell. 109; 
Whitehouse v, R. Co., L. R., 5 Ex. 1 3. 

— year to year. In lease. Doe v. Green, 9 Ad. & Ell. 658. 
whatever cause. In bill of lading. Smith v. New York, etc.. 



R. Co., 29 Barb. 1 32 ; 24 N. Y. 222. 

heard . Fellows v. Fellows, 8 N. H. 160. 

one month . Gore v, Hughes, 7 Mon. 521. 

sell or receive any slave. In statute. Worrell v. State, 12 

Ala. 732. 

transcript 
198. 



the books. In statute, U. S. v. Ganssen, 19 Wall. 



-with interest 



1886. In note. Evans v, Sanders, 8 Port. 497 



(33 Am. Dec. 297). 

In deed. Tracy v, Chicago, 24 111. 500. 

in of. In lease. Des Moines v, Dow, 31 Iowa, 89. 

In statute. Wakefield Co. v. Meader, 5 C. P. Div. 248 ; Wakefield Bd. 
V, Lee, I El. Div. 336. 

industriales. Purner v. Piercy, 40 Md. 212. 

In insurance policy. Humphreys v. Ins. Co., 3 Mason, 440. 

the annual thereof, in deed. Bullen v. Denning, 5 R &. C. 

847. 
Edgar v. McCutcheon, 9 Mo. 768 ; Linck v. Kelly, 25 Ind. 278. 

Kingsbury's Case, 106 Mass. 227. 

from justice. Jones v. Leonard, 50 Iowa, 106 (32 Am. Rep. 1 16). 

and complete car^x>. In charter-party. Hunter v. Fry, 2 B. & 

Aid. 426; Morris v. LevM'^n, i C. P. Div. 155; Ogden v. Parsons, 
23 How. 167 ; Cuthbert v. Cumming, 10 Ex. 809; 11 Ex. 405. 



lULL, 



147 



FURNITURE. 



FULL — Continued. 



and sufficient release and 



In assignment, Agnew 



V, Dow, 5 Whart. 131 (34 Am. Dec. 539). 

— oonfldenoe. In will. Re Hutchinson, 8 Ch. Div. 541. 

— consent. In will, Martin v. Shepherd, 10 Ir. L. T. Rep. 141. 

— oosts. In statute, Irwine v. Reddish, 5 B. & Aid. 797. 

— legislative powers. In constitution. School Com*rs v, Putnam^ 



FULLY. 



FUNDSD. 



44 Ala. 506. 

supply. Kemp v. Knickerbocker Ins. Co., 69 N. Y. 42. 

toll. In statute, Benjamin v, Andrews, 5 C. B. (N. S.) 299. 

wages. Sims v, Jackson, i Wash. 414. 

executed in . In record as to service of summons, Blackburn v, 

Jackson, 26 Mo. 308. 

in . In receipt, Muldon v. Whitlock, i Cow. 290(13 Am. Dec. 

533) ; Reid V. Reid, 2 Dev. (Law) 247 (18 Am. Dec. 570). 

as as any individual. In statute, Seyhert v. City of Roches- 
ter, I Wall. 272. 

In will, Stephens v, Milnor, 24 N. J. (Eq.) 358. 

debt. In statute, Ketchum v. City of Buffalo, 14 N. Y. 356. 

the . In will, Slingsby v. Granger, 7 H. L. Cas. 273. 

Donald v, McWhorter, 44 Miss. 124. 



FUNDS. 
FUNEBAL. 

In statute, Owens v. Bloomer, 14 Hun, 296 ; 21 N. Y. (S. C.) 296. 

In will, Fairman's Appeal, 30 Conn. 205. 

In statute. State v. Freeman, 27 Vt. 520 ; Att'y-Gen. v, Silleen, 2 H. 
& C. 623. 

evidence against himself. In constitution, Emery's Case, 107 

Mass. 182. 

In contract. Groves v. Miles, 58 111. 338. 

FUBWITUBB. Bell v. Golding, 27 Ind. 173 ; Rasure v. Hart, 18 Kas. 340, 

In deed. Fore v, Hubbard, 63 Ala. 412. 

In insurance policy, Brough v, Whitmore, 4 Term Rep. 206. 

In mortgage, Curtis v, Martz, 14 Mich. 506. 

In statute, Southampton Dock Co. v. Hill, 14 C. B. (N. S.) 243. 

In will, Hele v, Gilbert, 2 Ves. Sr. 43a 

and other household eflbots. In will, Foxall v, McKenney, 

3 Cranch C C. 206. 

used lyy him in housekeeping. In statute, Croswell v, Allis. 



25 Conn. 301. 

articles of household necessary for upholding lifb. In statute, 

Crocker v, Spencer, 2 D. Chip. 68 ; Hart v, Hyde, 5 Vt. 328 ; Dun- 
lap V, Egerton, 30 Vt. 224 ; Tanner v, Billings, 18 Wis. 163. 

household goods and . In deed, Bunn v, Winthrop, i Johns. 

Ch. 329. 

In will. Carnegy v. Woodcock, 2 Munf. 234. 

household * In statute, Rasure z/. Hart, f8 Kas. 340. 

In will, Finney v. Price, 10 Ch. Div. 13; Hooper's Estate, 6 Phila. 
364; Richardson 1/. Hall, 124 Mass. 228. 

rosewood . Ponsot v. Maxwell, 4 Blatchf. 44. 

signs and . In mortgage, Curtis v, Martz, 14 Mich. 506. 



FURNITURE. 



148 



GAME. 



FUBHTTUBE — Continued. 

Btook, plantation utenaila and household 
V, Kendall, 5 Munf. 272. 

FUBTHEB. ' 



In will, Kendall 



FUTUBE. 



GAINS. 
GAIJiONS. 



OAI1LOW8. 

GAMBLE. 

GAMBLING. 



GAME 



— allowance. In statute. Downing v. Marshall, 37 N. Y. 380. 

— aaaesament. In statute, Meech v. City of Rufialo, 29 N. Y. 198. 

— dTil and criminal juriadiotion. In constitution. Landers v. 
Staten Island R. R., 53 N. Y. 451. 

— oompenaation. In agreement, Hutchings v. Van Brunt, 38 N. 



Y. 335. 

— liability. In lease. O'Fallon v, Nicholson, 56 Mo. 28. 

— or other Taluable oonaideration. In statute. Re Bolton, L. 



R., 5 Ex. 82. 

prooeedings. In statute. Wetz v. Beard, 12 Ohio St 431. 

sum. In will, Lynes v, Townsend, 33 N. Y. 558. 

to hear. In statute, Reg. v, Oxley, 6 Q. R 262. 

without notice. In statute, Mitchell v. City of Milwaukee, 18 

Wis. 96. 

In statute, Sayor v. Defaur, 1 1 Q. B. 335. 

earnings. In statute. Somersi^. Keleher, 115 Mass. 165. 

editions. In will. Hone v. Kent, 6 N. Y. 390. 

extensions or branches. In contract. Morris., etc., R. Co. v. 

Sussex R. Co., 20 N. J. (Eq.) 542. 

payments. In statute. Day v, Bardwell, 97 Mass. 255. 



profits and income. In statute. Gray «/. Darlington, 15 Wall. 63. 

of proof spirit. In statute. U. S. v. Fox, i Lowell, 99. 

five . In indictment. State v. Lavake, 26 Minn. 526 (37 Am. 

Rep. 415)- 
Swiss . In libel, Wachter v, Quenzer, 29 N. Y. 547. 

In indictment. Bennett v. State, 4 Yerg. 472. 

State V, Bishel, 39 Iowa, 42 ; Clark v. State, 49 Ala. 37. 

— device. In statute. State v, X^mon, 46 Mo. 375 ; State v* Jack- 
son, 39 Mo. 420 ; Emper v. State, 35 Ark. 629 ; Trimble v. State, 27 
Ark. 359 ; Portis v. State, 27 Ark. 360 ; State v. Henyford, 19 Mo. 
377 ; Glasscock v. State, 10 Mo. 509 ; Lowry v. State, i Mo. 733 and 
note; State v. Lewis, 12 Wis. 436; State v, Hardin, i Kas. 474; U. 
S. V, Spedden, i C ranch C. C. 535 ; State v. Hayden, 31 Mo. 35 ; 
Smith V, State. 17 Tex. 191. 

game. In statute. State «/. Hawkins, 15 Ark. 259. 

Woodcock V, McQueen, 11 Ind. 14; State v, Henderson, 47 Ind. 127 ; 
Ellis V, Beale, 18 Me. 337 ; State v. Nantes, 2 Hill (S. C.), 200. 

In deed, Jeffreyes v. Evans, 19 C. B. (N. S.) 262. 

In statute, Kenyon v. Hart, 6 B. & S. 253 ; Miller v. State, 48 Ala. 
122; Trimble v. State, 27 Ark. 355; New Orleans v. Miller, 7 La. 
Ann. 651 ; Hizar v. State, 12 Ind. 330. 

of chance. In statute. Tollett v. Thomas, L. R., 6 Q. B. 516; 

Harless v. U. S,, i Morr. 169 ; State v, Gupton, 8 Ired. (L,) 271 ; 
Hush V, Molesbury, L. R., 6 Q. B. 130 ; State v. Bishop, 8 Ired. 266; 
Glasscock v. State, 10 Mo. 508. 

of hazard or skill. In statute. State v, Rorie, 23 Ark. 727. 



GAME. 149 GENERAL. 



— Continued. 

with dice. In statute. Wetmore v. State, 55 Ala. 198. 

aay except bowls, dhesB. In statute. Neal's Case, 22 Gratt. 

917. 

banking • In statute. State v. Martin, 22 Ark. 423. 

oonfldenoe Pierce v. People, 81 III. 98. 

iJiwAil sport, pastime or exeroise. In statute. Batty v, Mar- 
riott, 5 C. a 818. 

ether or games. In statute. Shropshire v. Glasscock, 4 Mo. 

536 (31 Am. Dec. 189) ; Boynton v. Curie, 4 Mo. 600. 

ether unlawAil • Vicaro v. Com., 5 Dana, 504; Com. v. Tilton, 

3 Mete. 232. 

unlawAil or sport. In statute. Com. v. Tilton, 8 Mete. 232. 

GAMnra. state V. Smith, Meigs, 99 (33 Am. Dee. 132, note) ; Bell v. SUte, 5 

Sneed, 507 ; Portis v. State, 27 Ark. 360 ; State v. Smith, 2 Yerg. 
281 ; Harrison v. State, 4 Coldw. 195; Eubanks v. State, 3 Heisk. 
490 ; Blewett v. State, 34 Miss. 6c6 ; Com. v. Taylor, 14 Gray, 26 ; 
Com. V. Gourdier, 14 Gray, 390 ; McDaniel v. Com., 6 Bush, 326 ; 
Cameron v. State, 15 Ala. 383 ; Swallow v. State, 20 Ala. 30. 

In statute. State v. Smith, 2 Yerg. 271; Smith v. State, 5 Humph. 
163; State V. Pearson, 2 Md. 312 ; Wolz v. State, 33 Tex. 331 ; Bag- 
ley V. State, I Humph. 486 ; Bell v. State, 5 Sneed, 507 ; Garrison v. 
McGregor, 51 111. 473; Harrison v. State, 4 Coldw^ 195; Shelton's 
Case, 8 Gratt 502 ; State v. Jackson, 39 Mo. 420 ; Eubanks v. State, 
3 Heisk. 488 ; Norton v. State, 15 Ark. 71 ; Com. v. Garland, $ Rand, 
652 ; Spaight v. State, 29 Ala. 32 ; Walker v. State, 2 Swan, 287 ; 
Reg. V. Ashton, i El. & Bl. 286 ; Parsons v. Alexander, 5 El. & Bl. 
263 ; Rourke v. Short, 5 El. & Bl. 910. 

apparatus. In statute. Hayes z^. State, 55 Ind. 99; Coolidge v. 

Choate, 11 Mete. 81 ; State v^ Hope, 15 Ind. 474. 

deyioe. In statute. State v. Leeviee, 12 Wis. 436. 

table. In statute. Toney v. State, 61 Ala. 3; State v. Lewis, 12 



rtv 



Wis. 436 ; U. S. V. Ringgold, 5 Cranch C. C. 378 ; U. S. v. Milburn, 
5 Cranch C. C. 300 ; U. S. v. Cooley, 5 Cranch C. C. 707. 

any whatsoever. In statute. Patten v. Rhymer, 3 El. & El. 5. 

Simons v. Lovell, 7 Heisk. 510; Com. v. Josselyn, 97 Mass. 411. 

Rose V. Whaley, 14 La. Ann. 374; Strickland v. Maddox, 4 Ga. 
393. 
In insurance policy. Stanley v. Ins. Co., L. R., 3 Ex. 71. 

fixtures. In contract. Downs v. Sprague, i Abb. App. Dec. 550. 

crop. In lease. Stoddard v. Waters, 30 Ark. 157. 

or growing. In will. Carnagy v. Woodcock, 2 Munf. 234 (5 

Am. Dec. 470). 

up. In plea. Haigh v. Brooks, 10 Ad. & Ell. 309. 



State V. Ingram, 16 Kas. 14; Turley v. State, 3 Humph. 323. 

QtEHSrSSRAJL. Re Bonaffe, 23 N. Y. 169. 

aooeptanee. In statute. Fayle v. Bird, 6 B. & C. 533. 

agent« Jaques v. Todd, 3 Wend. 83 ; Jeffreys. Bigelow, 13 Wend. 

518 ; Wood V. McCain, 7 Ala. 800. 

and ordinary business of a corporation. In statute. Reed v. 



Jones, 6 Wis. 690. 



GENERAL. 150 GIVE. 

GENEBAL— Continued. 

appraiser. In statute, Gibb v, Washington, i McAlI. 450. 

aaaigmnent. Longmere v. Goode, 38 Ala. 577. 

average. Bevan v. Bank of U. S., 4 Whart. 301 (33 Am. Dec. 

64): Columbian Ins. Co. v. Ashley, 13 Peters, 331 ; Wilson v. Cross, 
33 Cal. 60 ; Padelford v, Boardman, 4 Mass. 54S ; Potter v. Ocean 
Ins. Co., 3 Sumner, 39. 

credit. Bemis v. Kyle, 5 Abb. Pr. (N. S.) 232. 

demurrer. In statute. McGuire v. Van Pelt, 55 Ala. 345. 

field. Mansfield v. Hawkes, 14 Mass. 440. 

ftmd. People v. Board of Supervisors, 27 Barb. 575. 



In will, Lyman v. Parsons, 26 Conn. 494. 

law. In constitution. State v. Lean, 9 Wis. 279 ; Clark v. City 

of Janesville, 10 Wis. 138; Bishop t^. City of Milwaukee, 21 Wis. 
259 ; re Elevated R. Co., 70 N. Y. 327 ; 3 Abb. N. C. 401 ; Lerling 
V. City of Racine, i Biss. 314; People v, Wallace, 70 III. 680; People 
V, Wright, 70 111. 388 ; State v. Parsons, 40 N^ J. (L.) 123. 

opposition. Dodge v, Gardiner, 31 N. Y. 239. 

owner. Farmers* Nat. Bk. v, Logan, 74 N. Y. 568. 

power. Cutting v. Cutting. 20 Hun, 360. 

property. Stief v. Hart, i N. Y. 20. 

ship. Ward v. Green, 6 Cow. 173. 

tenancdes. In statute. Brown v, Bragg, 22 Ind. 122. 

terms. In statute, Merrill v, Everett, 38 Conn. 48 ; Gracie v. 



Freeland, i N. Y. 228. 

injunction to suspend the and ordinary business of a cor- 
poration. In statute. Doty?/. President, 14 Wis. 82. 

Q-ENTIaB. In warranty, Bodurtha v, Phelon, 2 Allen, 348. 

GENTIiEMAK. Allen 7/. Thomson,* i Hurl. & N. 16; Tuton v. Sanover, 3 Hurl. & 

N. 280 ; Sutton v, Bath, 3 Hurl. & N. 383 ; Morewood v. R. Co., 3 
Hurl. & N. 799 ; Williams' Case, i Ch. Div. 577 ; London, etc.. Loan 
Co. V, Chase, 12 C. B. (N. S.) 730 ; Gray v, Jouseife, 14 C. B. (N. S.) 

744. 
QJtiN UJJN K Baldwin v. Van Densten, 37 N. Y. 487 ; Dow v, Spenny, 29 Mo. 390. 

and regularly issued. In guaranty of bonds, Smeltzer t^. White, 



2 Otto, 391. 

GERMANE. County Comm*rs v, Meekins, 50 Md. 42. 

QJ^rTLNO OUT. In statute, Madison Coal Co. v. Str. Colona, 36 Mo. 446 ; Gibbons 

V, Str. Fanny Barker, 40 Mo. 253 . 

GIFT. Dewee's Estate, 3 Brewst. 314. 

In statute. Chapman v. Miller, 128 Mass. 269. 

enterprise business. Meserve v, Andrews, 106 Mass. 422. 



In statute. Queen v. Prince, L. R., 2 C. C. R. 175. 
GIVE. Parkinson v. State, 14 Md. 184. 

In contract, Norton v. Woodruff, 4 N. Y. 1 53 ; Field v. Pierce, 102 

Mass. 258 ; Carter t/. Alexander, 71 Mo. 585 ; Hooper v. Hooper, 9 

Cush. 129. 
In deed, Allen v, Sayward, 5 Greenl. 227 (17 Am. Dec. 221) ; Pierson 

V, Armstrong, i Iowa, 282; Frost v, Raymond, 2 Caines, 188; 

Grannis v, Clarke, 8 Cow. 36. 



GIVE. 151 , GOD. 

GIVE — Continued. 

In statute. Com. v. Davis, 12 Bush, 240. 

a bribe. State v. Marker, 4 Harr. 559. 

— a deed. In covenant. Ketchum v. Evertson, 13 Johns. 359(7 
Am. Dec. 384). 

and bequeath. In will, OToole v, Browne, 3 El. & Bl. 572 ; 



Eldridge v. Eldridge, 9 Cush. 519 ; Allen t/. White, 97 Mass. 504. 

— grant and convey. In deed. Young v. Rings, i Mon. 31. 

— information. In statute, Jones v, Sherwood, 37 Conn. 466. 

— liquor. In statute. Com. v. Davis, 13 Bush, 240. 
noUoe to the party. In statute. Barraclough v. Greenough, 7 



B. & S. 174. 
In statute. James v. Dubois, i Harr. 285 ; Reg. v. Justices, 7 Q. B. 195. 
in iMurodhial relief. In statute. Davies v. Harvey, L. R., 9 O. 

B. 433. 

credit . In guaranty. Broom v. Batchelor, i Hurl. A N. 260. 

GivjJiO. credit. In guaranty. Edwards v. Jevons, 8 C. B. 436. 

GlaABS. In statute. Bernstein v. Baxendale, 6 C. B. (N. S.) 251 ; Owen v. Bur- 

nett, I C. & M. 353. 

cut . In statute. Binns v. Lawrence, 12 How. 9; Tread win v, 

R. Co., L. R., 3 C. P, 311. 

ware in casks. Bend v. Georgia Ins. Co., Ang. on Ins. 25. 

German cylinder . In contract. Mixer t/. Coburn, 1 1 Mete. 559. 

Tnaimfteturers of . In statute. Arthur v. Sussfield, 6 Otto, 1 29. 

Tnaimftetures, articles, vessels and wares of . In statute, 

Roosevelt v. Maxwell, 3 Blatchf. 390. 

GO. at large. In statute. Com. v. Dow, 10 Mete. 382. 

in evidence. In written stipulation. Protection Life Ins. Co. 

V. Palmer, 81 III. 88. 

off large. Ward v. The Fashion, i Newb. 8 ; Hall v. The Buffalo, 



I Newb. 115. 

shall . In statute. Broad v. Broad, 40 Cal. 493 . 

QtOiy, act of . Nugent z/. Smith, i C. P. Div. 19,423; Klauber v. Amer- 

ican Ex. Co., 21 Wis. 21 ; Friend v. Woods, 6 Gratt. 189; Forward 
V. Pittard, i T. R. 27; Gillett v. Ellis, 11 111. 579; Read v. Spauld- 
ilig, 5 Bosw. 395 ; Nashville, ete., R. Co. v. David, 6 Hetsk. 261 ; 
Polack V. Roehe, 35 Cal. 416; Mynard v. Syracuse, etc., R. Co., 71 
N. Y. 180; Wallace v. Clayton, 42 Ga.443 ; Loveringv. Buck Moun- 
tain Coal Co., 54 Pa. St. 291 ; Lamont v. Nashville, etc., R. Co., 9 
Heisk. 58; Germania Ins. Co. v. The Lady Pike, 17 Am. L. Rep. 
614; Parsons v. Hardy, 14 Wend. 215 ; Harris v. Rand, 4 N. H. 259; 
Wallace v. Vigers, 4 Blaekf. 230; West v. The Berlin, 3 Iowa, 532; 
The Maggie Hammond, 9 Wall. 435 ; Worth v. Edmonds, 52 Barb- 
40 ; Ballenttne v. North Missouri R. Co., 40 Mo. 491 ; Neal v. Snun- 
derson, 2 S. &M. 572 ; Walpole v. Bridges. 5 Blaekf. 222 ; Williams?/. 
Grant, i Conn. 487 ; Crosby v. Fitch, 12 Conn. 410; McArthur v. 
Sears, 21 Wend. 190 ; Faulkner «/. Wright, Rice, 107 ; Moses v. Norris, 
4 N. H. 304 ; Hall v. Cheney, 36 N. H. 26 ; Hackett v. Boston, etc.. R. 
Co., 35 N. H. 390; Everlcigh V. Sylvester, 2 Brev. 178 ; McClenaghan 
V. Brock, 5 Rich. 17; Harrington v. Lyles, 2 Nott. & M. 88 ; Steamboat 
Co. V. Bason, Harp. 262 ; Patton v. Magrath, Dudley,.i59 ; Smyrl v 



GOD. 



152 



GOOD. 



QOD — Continued. 

Niolon, 2 Bailey, 421 ; Hayst/. Kennedy, 41 Pa. St. 378 ; Pennewill ?-. 
Cullen, s Harr. 238; Colt t/. McMechen, 6 Johns. 160 (5 Am. 
Dec. 200) ; Fei]guson v. Brent, 1 2 Md. 9 ; Parsons v, Monteath, 1 3 
Barb. 353 ; Central Line v, Lowe, 50 Ga. 509 ; Coggs v, Bernard, i 
Smith's Ld. Cas. 315; Thorogood z/. Marsh, i Gow. N. P. C. 105 ; 
Hyde v. Trent Nav. Co., 5 Term Rep. 389 ; Moore v, Michigan Cent. 
R. Co , 3 Mich. 23 ; Cox v, Peterson, 30 Ala. 608 ; Chevallier v. 
Straham, 2 Tex. 11$; Miller v. Steam Nav. Co., 10 N. Y. 431 ; Hal) 
V, Cheney, 36 N. H. 26; McCall v. Brock, 5 Strobh. 119; Nav. Co. 
V, Dwyer, 29 Tex. 376 ; Bulkley v. Naumkcag Cotton Co.., 24 How 
386 ; The Edwin, i Sprague, 477 ; The Mohawk, 8 Wall. 153 ; Brous- 
seau T'. The Hudson, 11 La. Ann. 427 ; Plaisted v, Boston Steam 
Nav. Co., 27 Me. 132 ; Mershon v, Hobensack, 22 N. J. (Law) 372 ; 
New Brunswick Steam Nav. Co. v. Tiers, 24 N. J. (Law) 697 ; Sprowl 
V, Kellar, 4 Stew. & P. 382 ; Ewart v. Street, 2 Bailey, 1 57 ; Kin^ 
V, Shepherd, 3 Story, 349 ; Lyon v. Mells, 5 East, 428 ; Reaves v. 
Waterman, 2 Spears, 197 ; Davis t/. Garrett, 6 Bing. 716 ; Birkett ?/. 
Willan, 2 B. & Aid 356; Bodenham v, Bennett, 4 Price, 31 ; Smith 
V. Home, 2 Moore, 18; Powell v, Layton, 2 Bos. & Pull. (N. R.> 
365 ; Siordet v. Hall, 4 Bing. 607 ; Muddle %». Stride, 9 C. & P. 380 ; 
Lowe V. Booth, 13 Price, 329 ; Beck ford 7/. Crutwell, 5 C. & P. 242 ; 
Cailif! V, Danvers, i Peake, 155 ; Hunter v. Potts. 4 Camp. 203 ; 
Oakley v. Steam Packet Co., 11 Ex. 618 ; Laveroni v, Drury, 8 Ex 
166 ; Hollingworth v, Brodrick, 7 Ad. & £. 40 ; Elliott v, Rossell. 
10 Johns. I ; Hart v, Allen, 2 Watts, 115; Williams v. Grant, i Conn. 
487 ; Cook V. Gourdin, 2 Nott & M. 19; Loomis v, Pearson, Harp. 
470; Bell V, Reed, 4 Binn. 127. 

aot of . In bill of lading, Merrett v, Earle. 29 N. Y. 115 ; Colt 

V. McMechen, 6 Johns. 160; Amies v, Stevens, i Str. 128. 

In contract. King v. Inhabitants, 6 B. & C. 733 ; 3 B. & Ad. 547. 

In statute. Young v. Cook, 3 Ex. Div. loi. 

or its equiTalent. In note. Holt v. Given, 43 Ala. 612. 

GK>OD. SUte v. Call, 48 N. H. 132. 

In negotiable fiafier. Espy z/. Bank of Cincinnati, 18 Wall. 604; Mer- 
chants' Bk. V, State Bk., 10 Wall. 604; Meads v. Merchants' Bk., 25 
N. Y. 143 ; Irving Bk. v. Wetherald, 36 N. Y. 335. 

In guaranty 0/ note. Cook z^. Nathan, 16 Barb. 342; Curtis v. Small- 
man, 14 Wend. 231. 

and oolleotible. In guaranty, San ford ?/. Allen, i Cush. 474. 

and oolleotible after due course of law. In guaranty. Moakeley 

V. Riggs, 19 Johns. 69 (10 Am. Dec. 197). 

and oolleotible two years. In guaranty. Marsh v. Day, 18 

Pick. 321. 

and oonvenient. In statute, Allgood v. Hill, 54 Miss. 666. 

and lawAil men. In indictment. Bonds v. State, i Mart. & 



GK>INO. 

aoij>. 



Yerg. 143 (17 Am. Dec. 795) ; State ?/. Glascow, Conf. Rep. 38 (2 
Am. Dec. 629). 

— and lawftQ. fence. In statute. Atchison, etc., R. Co. v, Jones, 
20 Kas. 527. 

— and lawAil freeholders. In return to writ. Day v. Roberts. 8 
Vt. 417 ; Aldis v, Burdick, 8 Vt. 21. 

— and lawAil reasons. In statute. Leonard v, Blair, 59 Ind. 510. 



GOOD. 153 GOOD. 

QOOD— Continued. 

and reeponsibla. Montpelier, etc., R. Co. v, Langdon, 45 Vt. 



— and sufficient deed of oonveyanoe. In agreement. Burwell 
V. Jackson, 9 N. Y. 535 ; Brown v. Corillard, 6 Cal. 573. 

— oatue. Virginia, etc., R. Co. v. Henry, 8 Nev. 165. 



In statute, Harnett v. Wise, 5 Ex. Div. 307. 

oanae shown. In statute. Whitcher v. Benton, 50 N. H. 2s ; 

Bennett v. R. Co., 2 Green, 145. 

oonaideration. In statute. Hodgson v. Butts, 3 Cranch, 140 ; 
Kellough V. Steele, i St. & P. 262 ; Cunningham v. Dwyer, 23 Md. 

219. 

— onrrent money. In contract. Moore v. Morris, 20 111. 255. 

— oufltom oowhide boots. /// contract. Waite v. Fairbanks, 



Brayt. 77. 

— Ihith. In statute. McConnel v. Street, 17 111. 253, Poland v. 
Mandel, 38 Cal. 30; Parker v. Paige, 38 Cal. 527 ; Winters z/. Haines, 
84 111. 585 ; Gress v. Evans, i Dakota Terr. 387. 

— for one seat. In railroad ticket. Dietrich v. R. Co., 7 1 Pa. St. 432. 

— Ibr six months only. In railroad ticket. Lillis v. St. Louis, etc. 
R. Co., 64 Mo. 464. 

for this date only. In railroad ticket. Elmore v. Sands, 54 N. 



Y. 512; Chesney v. R. Co., 11 Mete. 121; Boice v. R. Co., 61 
Barb. 61 1 ; Shedd v. R. Co., 40 Vt. 88. 

tor this trip only. In railroad ticket. Pier v. Finch, 24 Barb. 

514. 
tor twenty days. In railroad ticket! Hamilton v. R. Co., 51 

N. Y. 100. 

health. In insurance policy. Galbreath v. Ins. Co., 12 Bush. 33 ; 

Peacock v. New York Ins. Co., 20 N. Y. 293. 

merchantable hay. In contract. Fitch v. Carpenter, 43 Barb. 40. 

note. lu indictment. Com. v. Stone, 4 Mete. 48. 

order. In bill of lading. Ellis v. Willard, 9 N. Y. 529 ; Brad- 
street z^. Heran, 2 Blatchf. 116; The California, 2 Sawy. 12; West 
V. The Berlin, 3 Iowa, 522 ; Keith v. Amende, i Bush, 455 ; Bond v. 
Frost, 6 La. Ann. 801 ; Austin v. Talk, 20 Tex. 164; The Olbers, 3 
Ben. 148; Vaughan v. 630 Casks, 7 Ben. 506. 

order and condition. In bill of lading. Gowdy v. Lyon, 9 B. 

Mon. 112; Barrett v. Rogers, 7 Mass. 297; The Missouri v. Webb 
9 Mo. 193 ; Tierney v. New York, etc., R. Co., 10 Hun, 569 ; Carson 
V. Harris, 4 G. Greene, 516; Mitchell v. U. S. Ex. Co., 46 Iowa, 214: 
West V. The Berlin, 3 Iowa, 532 ; The Freedom, L. R., 3 P. C. 594. 

order and well oonditioned. In bill of hiding. Bradstreet v. 



Heran, 2 Blatchf. 1 16 ; Price v. Powell, 3 N. Y. 322. 

— reason to apprehend an attaok* In statute. Baker v. State 
49 Ala. 350. 

— team. In contract. Sanson v. Madison, 15 Wis. 144. 

— tenantable repair. Thomdike v. Burridge, in Mass. 531. 

— title. In charter. Warner v. Middlesex, etc., R. Co., 21 Conn. 



445- 
In contract. Kyle v. Kavanaugh, 103 Mass. 358. 
20 



4 



GOOD. 154 GOODS. 

OOOD' Continued. 

warranty deed of oonyeyanoe. In contract, Parker ?/. 

Parmele, 20 Johns. 130 (11 Am. Dec. 253). 

watoh. In insurance policy. Parker v. Bridgeport Ins. Co.. 10 



Gray, 302. 

apparent order. In biU of lading. The California, 2 Sawy. 12 ; 

The Oriflamme, i Sawy. 176. 

<a(OOD8« Ayres v, French, 41 Conn. 142. 

^ In indictment. Pickett v. State, 60 Ala. 77. 

In insurance policy, Cowley v, Cohen, 3 B. & Ad. 488 ; Wilkinson 
V, Hyde, 3 C, B. (N. S.) 44- 

In statute. Clay v. Yates, i Hurl. & N. 74 ; Smith v. Reynolds, i 
HurL & N. 222; Zung v, R. Co», 10 B. & S. 604; Pumphrey ?'. 
The Parkersburg, 2 West. Law Month. 491. 

and chattels* Collins v. People, 39 111. 233 ; Lauton v. Hick- 
man, 9 Q. Bi. 563 ; Passive Man. Co. v. HoflFman, 3 Daly, 495. 

In bond. Hays v. Bouthalier, i Mo. 347. 

In contract. Gibbs v. Usher, i Holmes, 348. 

In statute. Rex v. Crone, i Jebb. 47; Reg. v. Mead, 4 C. & P. 53s 
Reg. V, Dean, 2 Leach, 693 ; Reg. v. Boulton, i Den. C. C. 508 
Reg. V, Kilham, L. R., i C. C. R. 264 ; Com. v, Eastman, 2 Gray 
76; State V. Calvin, 2 Zabr. 207; Com. v. Swinney, i Va. Cas. 146 
U. S. v^ Moulton, 5 Mason, 537 ; Hall v. State, 3 Ohio St 575 
Com. z/. Bennett, 118 Mass. 452; State v. Brooks, 4 Conn. 446 
Strachan ?/. Thomes, 12 Ad. & Ell. 549; Batzell v. Hall, i Lilt. 
99; Thompson v. Chevean, 7 Mart. 331 ; Coombs v, Beaumont, 5 
B. & Ad. 76 ; Hornblower v. Proud, 2 R & Aid. 334. 

and merohandise. American Ins. Co. v. Griswold, 14 Wend. 

399. 
In insurance policy. Allegre v. Maryland Ins. Co., i Gill & J. 136 (20 

Am. Dec. 424) ; Duplanty v. Commer. Ins. Co., Anth. N. P. 1 57. 

In statute. Chamberlain v. West. Transp. Co., 44 N. Y. 305. 

or movables. In will. Jackson?/. Robinson, i Yeates, loi. 

out of any church. In statute. Rex v. Rourke, i Russ. & Ry. 

sold and delivered. In pleading. Galbreath v. Cole, 61 Ala. 

141. 

■ 

specie and eflbcts. In insurance policy. Gregory v. Christie. 3 

Doug. 419. 

usually kept in country stores. In insurance policy. Pinder 



V, Kings County Ins. Co., 36 N. Y. 648. 

— wares and merchandise. In statute. Lee v. Griffin, i R & S. 
272; Pickering V. Appleby, i Comyns, 354; Colt v. Nettewill, 2 P. 
Wms. 304 ; Mussell v. Cooke, Finch's Prec. Ch. 533 ; Crull v. Dodson. 
Sel. Cas. Ch. 41 ; Duncuft v. Albrecht, 12 Sim. 189; Humble v. 
Mitchell, II Ad. & E. 205; Heseltine v. Siggers, 1 Exch. 856; 
Tempest v. Kilner, 3 C. B. 249 ; Bowlby v. Bell, 3 C. B. 284 ; Bradley 
-v. Holdsworth, 3 Mees. & W.422 ; Watson v. Spratley, 10 Exch. 222 ; 
Paule V. Gunn, 4 Bing. N. R. 445; Tisdale v. Harris, 20 Pick. 13; 
The Elizabeth, 2 Mason. 407; Eastern R. Co.2/. Benedict, 10 Gray, 212 ; 
North V. Forest, 15 Conn. 400 ; Fay -z/. Wheeler, 44 Vt. 292 ; Colvin v. 
Williams, 3 Harr. & J. 38 ; Baldwin v. Williams, 3 Mete. (Mass.) 395; 



GOODS. 155 GOOSEHORN. 



GOODS- Continued. 

Mills V, Gore, 20 Pick. 28 ; Clapp v, Shephard, 23 Pick. 228 ; Riggs 
7'. Magruder, 2 Cranch, 143; Peabody v. Speyers, 56 N. Y. 230; 
Somerby v. Buntin, 118 Mass. 285; Beers v, Crowe II, Dudley, 29; 
Walker v. Supple, 54 Ga, 178 ; Gadsden v. Lance. McMuU (S. C). 
Eq. 87; Gooch z/. Holmes, 41 Me. 523 ; Whittemore v, Gibbs« 24 N. 
H. 484 ; Vawter v. Griffin, 40 Ind. 593 ; Hudson v. Weir, 29 Ala. 
294; Pray v. Mitchell, 60 Me. 430; Smith v, Bouck, 33 Wis. 19: 
Fine v. Homsby, 2 Mo. App. 61 ; Chanter v, Dickinson, 5 Man. & 
G. 253; Gould V, Banks, 8 Wend. (N. Y.) 562; Sowers v, Osborne, 

1 Stra. 506; Clayton v. Andrews, 4 Burr. 2101 ; Groves v. Buck. 3 
Maule & S. 178; Downs 7/. Ross, 23 Wend. 270; Sewall v. Fitch, 8 
Cow. 215; Crookshank v, Burrell, 18 Johns. 58; Robertson v, 
Vaughan, 5 Sandf. i ; Bronson v, Wiman, 10 Barb. 406 ; Donovan 
7/. Willson, 26 Barb. 138; Bennett v, Hull, 10 Johns. 364; Parsons 7'. 
Loucke, 48 N. Y. 17 ; Deal v. Maxwell, 51 N. Y. 652 ; Bates v. Cos- 
ter, I Hun, 400; Reutch v. Long, 27 Md. 188; Waterman v. Meigs; 
4 Cush. (Mass.) 497; Jackson v. Covert, 5 Wend. (N. Y.) 139; 
Houghtaling v. Ball, 19 Mo. 84; Ellison v, Brigham, 38 Vt. 64. 
Mixer 7/. Howarth, 21 Pick. (Mass.) 205; Mead v. Case, 33 Barb. (N. 
Y.) 202; Wilks V, Atkinson, 6 Taunt. 12 ; Watts v. Friend. 10 Barn. 

6 C. 446; Bowman v. Conn, 8 Ind. 58; Pitkin 7/. Noyes, 48 N. H. 
394 ; Smith v, Surman, 9 Barn. & C. 561 ; Northern v. State, i Ind. 
112; Seymour v, Davis, 2 Sandf. (N. Y.) 239; Ide v, Stanton* 15 Vt. 
685 ; Garbutt v. Watson, 5 Barn. & Aid. 613 ; Lamb v. Crafts, 12 Mete. 
356; Atwater 7/. Hough, 29 Conn. 508; O'Neil 7/. New York Mining Co., 
3 Nev. 141 ; Edwards v. Grand Trunk R. Co., 54 Me. 105 ; Finney 7'. 
Apgar, 31 N. J. L. 266; Clark 7/. Nichols, 107 Mass. 5^7; Goddard v, 
Binney, 115 Mass. 450; Sewall v. Fitch, 8 Cow. 219; Smith v, N. V. 
Cent. R. Co., 4 Keyes, 180; Killmore v. Howlett, 48 N. Y. 569; 
Gardner 7/. Joy, 9 Mete. 179; Spencer v. Cone, i Mete. (Mass.) 283; 
Mattison v, Wescott, 13 Vt. 258; Allen v. Jarvis, 20 Conn. 38; 
Cummings v. Dennett, 26 Me. 401 ; Cason 7/. Cheely, 6 Ga. 554; 
Bird 7/. Muhlinbrink, i Rich. (S. C.) Law, 199; Buxton v. Bedall. 3 
East, 303 ; Hight v, Ripley, 19 Me. 139 ; Parker v, Schenck, 28 Barb. 
(N. Y.) 38 ; Abbott v, Gilchrist, 38 Me. 260 ; Winship v. Buzzard. 
9 Rich. (S. C.) Law, 103 ; Higgins v, Murray, 4 Hun (N. Y.), 565 ; 
Clay 7/. Yates, i Hurl. & N. 73 ; Lee 7/. Griffin, i Best & S. 272 ; Scott 
V, Eastern Counties R. Co., 12 Mees. & W. 33; Fine v, Horsley, 2 
Mo. (App.) 61 ; Smith v, Wilcox. 1^ N. Y. 353; Crodkshank v, 
Bunnell, 18 Johns. 58 (9 Am. Dec. 58) ; Fine v, Hornesby. 2 Mo. 
(App.) 61 ; Forbes v. Marsh, 15 Conn. 408; The Elizabeth & Jane, 

2 Mason, 407 ; U. S. v. Chain Cable, 2 Sumn. 362 ; IJ. S. 7/. Cordage. 
Gilp. 299; Sewall 7/. Allen, 6 Wend. 335. 

wareBy merohandise, articles or objects. In statute. The Dis- 
tilled Spirits, 1 1 Wall. 356. 

all my and chattels. In will Jepson v. Key, 2 H. & C. 878. 

BellV. Ellis, 33 Cal. 620 ; Howe 7/. Searing, 6 Bosw. 354 ; Fenn v. Bolles. 

7 Abb. Pr. 202 ; Glen, etc., Manfg. Co. v. Hall. 61 N. Y. 226 ; Bradford 
V, Peckham, 9 R. L 250; Sherman v, Houghton, 5 Blatchf. 285. 

In contract. Smith v. Gibbs, 44 N. H. 343 ; Llewellyn v. Rutherford. 
L. R., 10 C. P. 457 ; Brown 7/. Moss, 70 N. Y. 465 ; Mitchell 7/. Read. 
19 Hun, 418. 

Dyer 7/. Morris, 4 Mo. 218. 



GOVERNOR. 156 GRANT. 

GK>VSBNOB. In complaint, Bridgeport Savings Bk. v. Randall, 15 Wis. 541. 

In statute. Whitsett v. Forehand, 79 N. C. 330. 
GRACE. Mechanics' Bk. v. Merchants' Bk., 6 Mete. 32. 

GBADDrQ*. Aldrich v. Providence, 12 R. I. 241. 

GRAIN. Daws v. Benn, i B. & C. 767. 

In Uase, Smith v, Clayton, 29 N. J. (L.) 357. 

In statute, Holland v. State, 34 Ga. 455. 

in staokfl and graoAry on llunn. In insurance policy, Hewit 

V, Watertown Ins. Co., 55 Iowa 100. 

other — . In contract, Warren v. Peabody, 8 C. B. 800. 

GRANARY. In statute. State v, Wilson, 47 N. H. loi . 

GRAMMAR. sdhools. In constitution, Jenkins v. Andover, 103 Mass. 97. 

GRAND. jury. Low's Case, 4 Greenl. 439 (16 Am. Dec. 27). 

GRANDCHIIiDREN. In will Hamilton v, Lewis, 13 Mo. 185 ; Hussey v, Berkeley, 

2 Eden, 194; Hone v. Van Schaick, 3 Barb. Ch. 488; 3 N. Y. 538; 
Ferguson v. Mason, 2 Sneed, 618; Smart v. King, Meigs, 149 (33 
Am. Dec. 137). 

GRANITE. building. In insurance policy, Medina v. Builders' Ins. Co., 120 

Mass. 225. 

GRANT. Seale v. Ford, 29 Cal. 104; U. S. v, Clarke, 8 Pet. 436; Darby v, Cal- 

laghan, 16 N. Y. 71. 

In assignment of lease, Blair?/. Rankin, 11 Mo. 440. 

In deed, Crowther v, Wentworth, 6 B. & C. 371 ; Moneypenny v. 
Moneypenny, 9 H. L. Cas. 114. 

In lease. Barker v, Harris, 9 Ad. & EU. 532 ; Grannis v. Clarke, 8 Cow. 
502; Jackson v, Bemis, i McClelland, 64; Stott v, Rutherford, 2 
Otto, 108. 

In statute. Rice v. Railroad Co., i Black, 358 ; Brewster v. Madden, 
15 Kas. 249; Ross^v. Adams, 4 Dutch. 161 ; i Vroom, 505; Potter r. 
Holland, 4 Blatchf. 206. 

demise. In lease, Barney v, Keith, 4 Wend. 502. 

bargain and selL In deed, MuUer v, Bog^s, 25 Cal. 175 ; Hawk 

V, McCullough, 21 111. 220; King v, Gibson, 32 111. 348; Tagg^ert r. 
Risley, 4 Oregon, 235 ; Frost v, Raymond, 2 Caines, 188 (2 Am. 
• Dec. 228) ; Armstrong v. Darby, 26 Mo. 517 ; Dickson v. Desire, 23 

Mo. 151 ; Chambers v. Smith, 23 Mo. 174; Alexander v, Schreiber, 
13 Mo. 272; S. C, 10 Mo. 460; Mosely V. Hunter, 15 Mo. 323; Carter 
V. Soulard, i Mo. 577 ; Collier v. Gamble, 10 Mo. 467 ; Stetton v, 
Rease, 10 Mo. 474; Clove v, Graham, 64 Mo. 249 ; Bukler v, Rogers. 
60 Mo. 138; Blossom v. Van Court, 34 Mo. 390; Pratt v, Eaton, 65 
Mo. 157; Winston v. Vaughan, 22 Ark. 73; Funk v, Voneida, 11 S. 
&R. no (14 Am. Dec. 617); Benton Co. v, Rutherford, 33 Ark, 640; 
Brodie v, Watkins, 31 Ark. 319. 
In statute, Maguire v, Riggen, 44 Mo. 512 ; Gee v, Pharr, s Ala. 586; 
Claunch v, Allen, 12 Ala. 159. 

bargain, sell and oonyey. In deed, Bethell v, Bethell, 54 Ind. 

428. 

bargain, sell and enfeoff. In deed. Perry v. Price, i Mo. 553. 

make over and . In deed, Jackson v, Alexander 3 Johns. 484. 

by . In statute, McVey v. Green Bay R. Co., 42 Wis. 532. 



GRANT, 



157 



GROUND. 



GRAITF — Continued. 

new- 



GBAITFED. 



GRAITFEE. 

GRAirrOB. 

GRAirrOBS. 
GBAITFS. 



— or ordor of tanrey* In stoHOe, Pollard v. Kibbe, 14 
Peters, 353. 

Patterson v, Winn, 1 1 Wheat. 38a 

deinlaed and to turn, let. In lease, Stott v. Rutherford, 2 Otto, 

107. 

Potter V, Holland, i Fish. 327, 4 Blatchf. 206 ; Van Rensselaer v. Sheriff, 
I Cow. 501. 

In statute. Pratt v, Eaton, 65 Mo. 1 57 ; Darwin v, Lincoln, 5 B. & Aid. 

450. 
Tasker v, Bartlett, 5 Cush. 365. 
In decree, U. S. v. Hare, 4 Sawyer, 653. 



GBAirCTXiATED. 



tobaooo. In statute, Venable v, Richards, i Hugh. 326. 



GBAT. 



GRLBVJiSD. 
GBTEVOTIS. 



GRINDSTOKE. 
GB088. 



Brown v. Brown, 8 Mete. 573. 

In statute. Hatch v, Hawkins, 126 Mass. 177. 

mare. In indictment. State v. Hill, 65 Mo. 84. 

part of them in intereet. In statute, Henry v. Thomas, 119 

Mass. 583. 

Hickey v. State, 23 Ind. 21 ; Wesley v. State, 61 Ala. 282. 

In indictment. Wesley v. State, 61 Ala. 282. 

ouzrenoy. In note. Barton v. Brooks, 25 Ark. 215. 

In statute. Brairley v, Athorpe, 5 B. & Aid. 320. 

parties — ^. In statute. Butcher v. Harrison, 4 B. & Ad. 130. 

bodily harm. Reg v, McNeill, i Crauf. & Dix C. C. 80; Rex v. 

Hunt, I Moody, 93; Rex v. Phillips, i Crauf. & Dix, 164; Reg. v. 
Carruthers, 3 Crauf. & Dix, 391 ; Rex v. Cox, Russ. & Ry. 362. 

Patterson v. Dudley, 12 Gray, 375. 

— inoomei In statute. Opinion of Judges, 5 Mete. 598. 

— neglect of duty. In statute. Smith v. Smith, 22 Kas. 699; 
Thorp V. Thorp, Wright, 763. 

negligence. Austin v, R. Co., 10 C. B. 474: Oill v, Middleton, 



105 Mass. 479; Neal v, Gillett, 23 Conn. 443; Hinton v, Dibbin, 2 
Q. *B. 648. 

In contract* Beal v. South Devon R. Co., 3 H. & C. 337. 

In insurance policy, Lycoming Ins. Co. v. Barringer, 73 III. 230; 
Campbell v. Monmouth, etc., Ins. Co., 59 Me. 430. 

In statute. Hansford v, Payne, 1 1 Bush, 382 ; Railroad v, Robinson, 
4 Bush, 509 ; Tudor v, Lewis, 3 Mete. 38$ ; Lexington v. Lewis, 10 
Bush, 699 ; Board v. Seance, 2 Duv. 576 ; Railroad v. Murphy, 9 
Bush, 525. 

— r— receipts from passengers* In statute. New Jersey Steam Co. 
V, Pleasanton, 8 Blatchf. 259. 

wantonly or cruelly to neglect. In statute. Hurlburt v. 



GBOUHD. 



Hurlburt, 14 Vt. S^i ; Mandigo v, Mandigo, 15 Vt. 786; Jennings v. 
Jennings, 16 Vt. 607 ; Peabody v, Peabody, 104 Mass. 195 ; Holt v. 
Holt, 117 Mass. 202. 

Com. V. Roxbury, 9 Gray, 491. 

In deed, Scratton v. Brown, 4 B. & C. 503; Fere v. Sixth Ward 
School Dist., 76 Pa. St. 376. 

chicory. Arthur v, Harold, 10 Otto, 77. 



GRO UND. 



158 



HABIT. 



GBOUND — Continued. 

of action. In statute, Nash v, Adams, 24 Conn. 33 ; Howland 

V. Couch, 43 Conn. 52 ; Church v. Syracuse Co^l Co., 32 Conn. 372. 

GROUND-BENT. In lease. Wesley v. Walker, 26 W. R. 368. 

GBOUNDS. In statute. State v, Jersey City, i Dutch. 525. 

money to due. In assignment, Brainerd v. Dunning, 30 N. 

Y. 711. 

crops . In statute. Bradner v. Faulkner, 34 N. Y. 347. 



GBOW. 



GBOWIKG. 
GBXJB. 

GUANO. 
GUABAN*** 



guabant: 



:^:^l 



dear and pile the bush. In contract. Holmes v. Samuel, 15 

III. 412. 
Whiton V. Albany Ins. Co., 109 Mass. 24. 

In contract. Warren v. Palmer, 24 Mo. 78 ; Packer v. Benton. 35 
Conn. 343 ; Thayer z/. Wild, 107 Mass. 452 ; Boyd v. Moyle, 2 C. B. 
652. 

the pajrment. In note. Oxford Bk. v. Haynes, 8 Pick. 423 (19 

Am. Dec. 334) ; Allen v. Rightmire, 20 Johns. 365 (i i Am. Dec. 288). 

I will . McNaughton v. Conkling, 9 Wis. 316. 

fbr cargo in all thia month. In charter-party. Barker 7. 



McAndrew, 18 C. B. (N. S.) 760. 

dividend . In charter. Lockhartt^.Van Alstyne, 31 Mich. 76(18 

Am. Rep. 156). 

quantity . In contract. Bissell v. Campbell, 54 N. Y. 353. 

GUABANTY. Ayres v. Findley, i Pa. St 501 ; Dale v. Young, 24 Pick. 250; Redficld 

7/. Haight, 27 Conn. 31 ; McMillan v. Bulls Head Bk., 32 Ind. n : 
Durham v. Manrow, 4 N. Y. 533 ; Parker v. Culverson, i Wall. Jr. 

In promissory note. Durham v. 'Manrow, 4 N. Y. 533; Allen v. Right- 
mire, 20 Johns. 365 (II Am. Dec. 288); Johnson v. Chapman, 3 Pa. 
18; Parker V. Culbertson, i Wall. Jr.* 149. 

GUABDIAN. Bass v. Cook, 4 Port. 390. 

In statute. Queen v. Inhabitants, 13 Q. R 642 ; McCready v. Wilcnx. 
33 Conn. 327. 

in socage. Combs v. Jackson, 2 Wend. 153 (19 Am. Dec. 568). 

natural . In statute. Mauro v. Forrest, 3 Cranch C. C. 147. 



GUABDIANS. 
GUEST. 



GUILTY. 



GULF. 



HABIT. 



In statute. Reg. v. St. Pancross, i El. B. & El. 598. 

Manning t/. Wells, 9 Humph. 746; McDonald v. Edgerton, 5 Barb. 560: 
Shoecraft v. Bailey, 25 Iowa, 553 ; Smith v. Keyes, 2 N. Y. (S. C.i 
650 ; Ingolsbee v. Wood, 36 Barb. 452; Norcross v. Norcross, 53 Me. 
163; Jalie V. Cardinal, 35 Wis. 118; Pinkerton ?/. Woodward. 33 
Cal. 557 ; Willard v. Rhinehardt, 2 E. D. Smith, 148 ; Mason v. 
Thompson, 9 Pick. 280 (20 Am. Dec. 471) ; Willing v. Potter, 35 
Conn. 185; Coykendall v, Eaton, 55 Barb. 188 r Berkshire Woolen 
Co. V. Proctor, 7 Cush. 417; McDaniels v. Robinson, 26 Vt 316; 
Grinnell v. Cook, 3 Hill, 485. 

In verdict of jury. State v. White, 25 Wis. 360. 

of assault with attempt to commit a rape. In verdict. Prince 

V. State, 35 Ala. 367. 

of Finland. Uhde v. Walters, 3 Camp. 15. 

person in the of getting intoxicated, in statute. Mulliniz v. 

People, 76 III. 211. 



HABITANCY. 



159 



HAZARB. 



HABTTAHCY. Lyman v. Fiske, 17 Pick. 231 (28 Am. Dec. 293). 
HABITATION. In statute. Rex v, Cahill, i Jebb. 37. 

HABTTUAJi. dmnkard. Com. v. Whitney. 5 Gray. 85 ; Ludwig v. Com., 6 

Harris (Pa.), 172; State v. Pratt, 34 Vt. 323. 
HABITTJAIXY. use intozioatiiig drinks. In insurance application, Swick 



V, Home Ins. Co., 2 Dill. 160. 
HACKNEY-COACH. Masterson v. Short, 33 How. Pr. 481. 

HAIR. of animals. In statute. Von Slade z/. Arthur, 13 Blatchf. 251. 

for purposes. In lease. Hanrahan v, O'Reilly, 102 Mass. 202. 

logs on . In contract. Crouch v, Parker, 56 N. Y. 597. 

HANDICRAFT. In statute, Beadon v. Parlett. L. R.. 6 Q. B. 718. 

HANDICRAFTSMAN. or artifioer. In statute, Lawrence v. Todd, 14 C. B. 

(N. S.) 554. ^ 

HANDKERCHIEFS. 



In indictment. Rex v, Nibbs, 1 Moody, 25. 



HANDWRITING. Com. v. Webster, 5 Cush. 301. 

State V, Messmore, 14 Wis. 193. 

In constitution. Re Smith, 38 Cal. 704. 
HARBOR. Jones v. Van Zandt, 5 How. 215, Queen v. Dock Co., 7 Q. B i. 

In statute. Van Mehr v, Mitchell, 2 Wall. Jr. 31. 

of Boston. Martin v. Hilton, 9 Mete. 371. 

HARBORAGE. Hays v, Briggs, 74 Pa. St. 373. 

HARBORING. In statute. Van Metre v. Mitchell, 2 Wall. Jr. 311. 

HARD-PAN. In contract, Dickinson v. Water Comrns., 2 Hun, 615. 

HAS. In statute, Atty.-Gen. v. Middleton. 3 Hurl. & N. 136. 

HAT. braids. In statute, Arthur v, Stephani, 6 Otto, 125. 

BLATS. of straw, ohip or grass. In statute, U. S. v, Goodwin, 4 Mason, 

128. 

been resident. In warrant, Kinning's Case, 10 Q. B. 730. 

In statute, Bodenham v, St. Andrews, i EI. & Bl. 469. 

obtained. In statute, Benjamin v. Belcher, ix Ad. & Ell. 367. 

or keep any house for public entertainment. In statute. 

Queen v, Strungell, 7 B. & S. 127. 

subscribed. In statute, London R. Co. v, Graham, i Q. B 271. 

any charge I made. In will. Van Alstyne v. Van Alstyne^ 

28 N. Y. 375. 
every man you in your employ* In contract, McDonald v, 

Berrick, 43 Mich. 438. 

I sold. In contract, Atwood v, Cobb, 16 Pick. 227 (s6 Am. 

Dec. 657). 

U. S. V, Morel, 13 Am. Jur. 279. 

advanced^ 'In guaranty, Bainbridge v. Wade, 16 Q. B. loi. 

agieed. In pleading. Tanner v. Bury, 9Q. B. i. 

and holding lands. In statute. Ward v. Cost, 10 B. & C. 649. 

resigned. Steele v. Hoe, 14 Q. B. 431. 

without issue. In will. Cole v, Goble, 13 C. B. 454. 

Com. V, Ober, 12 Cush. 495. 

In statute, Brawley v, Athorpe, 5 B. & Aid. 320. 

extreme . King v, Hartford Ins. Co., i Conn. 421. 



HAVEN. 



HAWKER. 



HAZARD. 



HAZARDO US. 



z6o 



HEIR, 



HAZABDOUS. In insurance policy, Pinder v. Continental Ins. Co^ 38 N. Y. 364. 

. In insurance policy, Pinder v. Continental Ins. Co., 58 



HEAD. 



HEALTH. 
HEALTHT. 



HEAB. 



HEART). 



HEAT. 



N. Y. 364. 

more biigine— . In statute, Mut Fire Ins. Co. v, Coatsville 

Shoe Factory, 80 Pa. St. 407. 

not . In insurance policy, Pinder v. Continental Ins. Co., 38 N. Y. 

364. 
other extra purpoeee. In insuraetce policy, Reynolds v. Com. 

Fire Ins. Co., 47 N. Y. 597. 

speoially . In insurance policy, Pinder v. Continental Ins. Co.. 

38 N. Y. 364. 

of a fbmily. In statute. Parsons?/. Livingston, 11 Iowa, 104; 



,% Wade V, Jones, 20 Mo. 75 ; Brown v. Brown, 68 Mo. 388 ; Whitehead 
V, Tapp, 69 Mo. 415 ; Nash v, Norment, 5 Mo. (App.) 545 ; Barney v. 
Leeds, 51 N. H. 253 ; Lathrop v. Soldiers' Loan Soc., 45 Ga. 483; 
Marsh v, Lazenby, 41 Ga. 153 ; State v, Spencer, 64 Mo. 355 ; Garaty 
V, Du Bose, 5 S. C. 493 ; Sallee v. Waters, 17 Ala. 482 ; E^chman v, 
Crawford, 3 Humph. 216; Ladiga v, Roland, 2 How. 581 ; Whalen 
V, Cadman, 1 1 Iowa, 266 ; Rountree v, Dennard, 59 Ga. 629 (27 Am. 
Rep. 629) ; Lynch v. Pace, 40 Ga. 173. 

In treaty. Turner v. Fish, 28 Miss. 306. 

of an Indian. In treaty, Morgan v. Fowler, 2 Yei^g. 450. 

of department. In city charter, Roosevelt v. Draper, 28 N. Y. 



318. 
other 



of the oorporation. In statute. City of Sacramento v. 



Fowle, 21 Wall. 119. 

good. In insurance policy, Swick v. Home Ins. Co., 2 Dill. 160; 



Peacock v, N. Y. Life Ins. Co., 20 N. Y. 293. 

Bell V, Jeflfries, 13 Ired. (L.) 356. 

and able-bodied person. In statute. Town of Marlborough 

V, Sisson, 26 Conn. 57 ; Starksboro v, Hinesbuigh, 15 Vt 200. 

In statute. King v. Justices, 2 Ad. & Ell. 772. 

and determine. Cutler v. Wall, 9 R. I. 264. 

not been of. Prudential Ass. Co. v, Edmunds, 2 App. Cas. 489. 

suit has been . In statute, Wilson v. Hood, 3 H. & C. 148. 

In statute. Queen v, Exeter, 5 Q. B. 342 ; Tunnicliffe v, Tedd. 5 C. B. 

554. 
of any motion. In statute, Morgan v, Alexander, L. R., 10 C. 

P. 185. 

of the application. In statute. Queen v. Stamper, i Q. B. 12a 

of passion. State v. Wieners, 66 Mo. 13. 

injuries in consequence of . In bill of lading. Cragin v. N. Y. 

Cent. R. R., 51 N. Y. 61. 

In statute. Milligan v, Jefferson Co., 2 Mon. Terr. 543 ; Pomeroy v. 
Tumper, 8 Allen, 403. 

Sugg V. Tyson, 2 Hawks, 472 ; Henry v, Henry, 9 Ired. (L.) 278 ; Ward 
V, Stow, 2 Dev. Eq. 509 ; Castro v. Tennant, 41 Cal. 253 ; Brownell v, 
Brownell, 10 R. I. 509. 

In statute, Gillespie v, Nabors, 59 Ala. 491 ; State v, Engle, i Zab. 347- 

In will. Wurter v. Penatt, 6 Man. & G. 379. 



HEIR. X6l HEIRS. 

— Continued. 



:■:-!■: 



: I :^ I ; 



: ■ ^H I : 



— at law. In will, Harrison v, Nixon, 9 Peters, 483 ; Aspden's 
Estotc, 2 Wall. Jr. 368. 

— at law of the testator. In statute. Fortune v. Buck, 23 Conn. i. 



21 



eldest . In will Canedy t^. Haskins, 13 Mete. 403. 

without an at death. In will Robinson v. Bishop, 23 Ark. 

379. 
In will. Byng v. Byng, 10 H. L. Cas. 171. 

Merrill v, Atkin, 59 111. 19; Richards v. Miller, 62 111. 417; Powell v, 
Brandon, 24 Miss. 343. 

In contract, Jacobs v, Jacobs, 42 Iowa. 600. 

In deed. Loring v. Elliott, 16 Gray, 568; Sedgwick v. Laflin, 10 
Allen, 431; Knowlton v, Leavitt, 121 Mass. 307; Whitaker v, 
Blair, 3 J. J. Marsh. 236; Knowlton v. Leavitt, 121 Mass. 307; 
Twelves v, Neevil, 39 Ala. 175; Hunter v. Wilson, 12 Cal. 376; 
Macumber v. Bradley, 28 Conn. 445 ; Sweet v, Dutton, 109 Mass. 
589 ; Cole V, Lake Co., 54 N. H. 242 ; Doe v, Sneddle, 2 B. & Aid. 
129. 

In lease, Greenaway v. Hart, 14 C. B. 350. 

hi note. Cox v, Beltzhover, 1 1 Mo. 143. 

In statute, Duke of Cumberland v. Graves, 7 N. Y. 305 ; Gold v, Jud- 
son, 21 Conn. 616. 

In will. Keah v. Grenier, 56 N. Y. 220 ; Bundy v. Bundy, 38 N. Y . 
404; Scott V. Guernsey, 48 N. Y. 106; Campbell v, Rawdon, 18 N. 
Y. 412; re Phillips, L. R., 7 Eq. Cas. 15! ; re Stevens, L. R., 15 Eq. 
Cas. no; Parsons v. Parsons, L. R., 8 Eq. Cas. 260; Richard- 
son V, Martin, 55 N. H. 45 ; Harris v, McLean, 30 Miss. 533 ; 
Den V, Barnes, i Car. Law Repos. 484 (6 Am. Dec. 547) ; Roome 
V. Counter, i Halst. no (10 Am. Dec. 390); Ulric's Appeal, 86 
Pa. St. 386 (27 Am. Rep. 707); Kown v. Cutler, 26 Conn. 6 
Cook V, Catlin, 25 Conn. 387 ; Reinders v. Koppleman, 68 Mo. 482 
Bond's Appeal, 31 Conn. 134; Aspden's Estate, 2 Wall. Jr. 368 
Larabee v, Larabee, i Root, 555 ; Mace v. Cushman, 45 Me. 250 -^ 
Swanson v, Swanson, 2 Swan, 446; Williamson v. Williamson, 
18 B. Mon. 329; Love v. Buchanan, 40 Miss. 788 ; Bailey v, Patter- 
son, 3 Rich. (Eq.) 1 56 ; Clarke v. Cordis, 4 Allen, 466 ; Seabrook v. 
Seabrook, i McMillan Ch. 201 ; Henderson v, Henderson, i Jones 
(L.) 221 ; Haley t/. Boston, 108 Mass. 576; Walker ?/. Laxton, i Younge 

6 J. 569; Loring t/. Thorndyke, 5 Allen, 257; Corbett z/. Corbett, i 
Jones (Eq.) 1 14 ; Sweet v. Dutton, 109 Mass. 559 ; Porter's Appeal, 45 
Pa. St. 201 ; Dove?/. Torr, 128 Mass. 38; Russing^^. Russmg, 25 Ind. 
63; Drake 7/. Pell, 3Edw. 251-; Randt^. Sawyer, 115 Mass. 124; Ingram 
V. Smith, I Head, 4n ; Lee v, Lee, 7 B. Mon. 607; Williamson v^ 
Williamson, 18 B. Mon. 367; Weir's Will, 9 Dana, 442; Allen v, 
Vanmeter, i Mete. 277 ; Clay v. Clay, 2 Duv. 296 ; Feltman 7/. Butts, 
8 Bush, 120; Scudder v. Van Arsdale, 2 Beasley, 109; Hemarest 7/. 
Hopper, 2 Zab. 599; Kennedy v. Kennedy, 5 Dutch. 195; Den v, 
Lanquar, i South, 301 ; Ward v. Stow, 2 Dev. Eq. 509 (27 Am. Dec. 
238); Roach V, Martin, i Harr. 548 (27 Am. Dec. 746). 

and assignB. In will. Guernsey v. Guernsey, 36 N. Y. 267; 

re Newton, L. R., 4 Eq. Cas. 171 ; Brookman v. Smith, 6 Ex. 291 ; 

7 Ex. 271; Buxton V. Inhabitants, 10 Mete. 36; Jamaica Pond 



HEIRS. Z62 HEREDITAMENT. 



HSIB8 — Continued. 

Aqueduct Co. v. Chandler, 9 Allen, 159; Gifford ?/. Choate, 100 
Mass. 34. 

at law. In witi. Bundy v. Bundy, 38 N. Y. 404 ; Minot v. Tap- 

pan, 122 Mass. 535; Orr v, Hodgson, 4 Wheat. 453; McKinney?/. 
Stewart, 5 Kas. 384 ; Lombard v. Boyden, 5 Allen, 249 ; Abbott v. 
Bradstreet, 3 Allen, 587 ; Aspden's Estate, 2 Wall. Jr. 368. 

lawfully begotten. In will. Clarke v. Smith, 49 Md. 106 

male. In deed. Brune v, Martyn, 8 B. & C. 511. 



In will. Hamilton v. Wentworth, 58 Me. loi. 

male of the body. In will. Toller v. Atwood, i s Q. B. 929. 



^ male of hia body. In will. Jordan v. Adams, 6 C. B. (N. S.) 
748 ; 9 Id. 490. 

of the body. In deed. Monroe v. Bridges, 5 N. Y. 447; Roberts 



V. Ogdbourne, 37 Ala. 174; Knight v. Knight, 3 Jones (Eq.)» 167; 
Houghton V. Kendall, 7 Allen, 72. 

In will. Prescott v. Prescott, 10 B. Mon. 59 ; Johnson v. Johnson, 2 
Mete. 335 ; Jarvis v. Quigley, 10 B. Mon. 106 ; Churchill v. Churchill 
2 Mete. 469; Rhodes v. Ogbourne, 37 Ala, 174; Williams v. Allen. 
17 Gra. 81 ; Doe v. Hawley, 4 B. C . 623 ; Right v. Crever, 5 B. & C. 
867. 

— '— of the body lawfully begotten. In will. Raborg v. Ham- 
mond, 2 H. & G. 42. 

or legatees olaimitig as suoh. In statute. Harrison v. Harri- 



son, 39 Ala. 489. 

— or next of kin. In will. Re Thompson, 9 Ch. Div. 607. 
. In devise. Righter v. Forrester, i Bush, 279. 



lawftil In will. Smith v. Butcher, 10 Ch. Div. 113; Crickett 

V. Robinson, 46 N. H. 454 ; Biddle*s Appeal, 69 Pa. St. 190. 

lawftil of their own. In will. Abbottv. EssexCo.. i8How. 202. 

legal . In will. Re Dixon, 4 Prob. Div. 81 ; Brown v. Lawrence, 

3 Cush. 398. 

their forever. In will. Floumoy v. Floumoy, i Bush, 526. 

HEIiD. and firmly bound. Shattuck v. People, 5 111. 478. 

at the time of marriage. In statute. Witsell .?/. Charleston. 7 

o. \j. 00. 

in trost. In insurance policy. I now v. Carr, 61 Ala. 363. 



HEMP. carpeting. In statute. Baxter v. Maxwell, 4 Blatchf. 33. 

maniifbctures of • In statute. Baxter v. Maxwell, 4 Blatchf. 33. 

TTRRTflAFTEB. Ely v. Holton, 15 N. Y. 595 ; re Folsom, 56 N. Y. 60. 

In statute. Moore v. Mansert, 49 N. Y. 332 ; Com. v. Inhabitants, 106 
Mass. 268 ; Com. v. Pegram, i Leigh, 569 ; Allen v. Com., 2 Leigh, 
727 ; State v. Daley, 29 Conn< 272 ; Com. v. Armstrong, 9 Phila. 429. 

oonstruoted. In statute. Atfy.-Gen. v. Ware River Co., 115 

Mass. 402. 

HEBEDITAMENT. Queen v. Winchester, 3 Coke, 2 b. 

In deed. King v. Barker, 6 Ad. & Ell. 390. 

In statute. Colebroke v. Tickell, 4 Ad. & Ell. 917 ; King v. Trustees, 
3 B. & Ad. 220. * 

In will. Vick v. Sueter, 3 El. & Bl. 233. 



HEREIN. 163 HIGHWAY. 

HIUEIEIN'. proyided. In statute, Hartung v. People, 28 N. Y. 400. 

HEBEINBEFOBE. Taylor v. Umatilla Co., 6 Oregon, 401. 

mentioned. In plea. Queen v. Inhabitants, 17 Q. B. 563. 

In statute, Pye v, Mumford, 1 1 Q. B. 666. 

HEEUBTOFOBE. Allison v, Chaney, 63 Mo. 2S3 ; Andrews v. Thayer, 40 Conn. 157. 

In constitution, Wynehamer v. People, 13 N. Y. 378. 

In statute. Den v, Goldtrap, i N. J. (L.) 272 ; Savage v. Brook, 1 5 C. 
B. (N. S.) 289. 

rendered. In statute. Parsons v, Wayne Ct. Judge, 37 Mich. 

287. 

erected. In statute. State v. Troth, 5 Vroom, 377. 

mentioned. In will, Jepson v. Key, 2 H. & C. 878. 



HEBEIA. In insurance policy, Fitton v. Ins. Co., 17 C. B. (N. S.) 134. 

I do not to guaranty. In contract, Gerhard v. Bates, 2 EI. & 

Bl. 476. 

crimes and misdemeanon. In statute. State v, Knapp, 6 Conn. 

415 (16 Am. Dec. 68). 

school. Att'y.-Gen. v, Butler, 123 Mass. 304. 

seas. U. S. v, Hamilton, i Mason, 152; De Lovio v, Bort, 2 Gall. 



398 ; U. S. V, Grush, 5 Mason, 290 ; Johnson v. Twenty-one Bales, 
2 Paine, 601 ; U. S. v, Robinson, 4 Mason, 307 ; U. S. v, Seagrist, 4 
Blatchf 420 ; Queen v, Anderson, L. R., i C. C. R. 169 ; U. S. v, 
Mosel, 13 Am. Jur. 279. 

In statute, U. S. v, Wilson, 3 Bhitchf. 439 ; U. S. t^ . Robinson, 4 Mason, 
307 ; U . S. V. Grush, 5 Mason, 290. 

— ^ water mark. Teschamker v, Thompson, 18 Cal. 1 1. 

bidder. Fairfax v, Hopkins, 2 Cranch C. C. 134. 

court of law. In statute, Olney v, Arnold, 3 Dallas, 308. 

Peck 2/. Smith, i Conn. 103; Sutcliffe v. Greenwood, 8 Price. 535; 
Rex V, Cumberworth, 3 B. & Ad. 308 ; Makepeace v, Worden, i N. H. 
16; Stackpole v, Healey, 16 Mass. 33; Jackson v, Hathaway, 15 
Johns. 447 ; Rex v, Lloyd, i Camp. 260 ; Coffin v, Plymouth, 49 N. 
H. 173 ; Young v, Cuthbertson, i Macq. H. L.455 '* State v, Johnson. 
Phill. (L.) 140; Vantilburgh v, Shann, 24 N.J. (L.) 740; Jones v, 
Andover, 6 Pick. 59 ; Com. v, Hubbard, 24 Pick. 98 ; People v, 
Jackson, 7 Mich. 432 ; State v, Nudd, 23 N. H. 327 ; Morris v. Bowers, 
Wright, 749; Seneca Road Co. v. Auburn R. Co., 5 Hill, 170 ; Jones 
V, Andover, 6 Pick. 59 ; Blackstone v, Worcester, 108 Mass. 68. 

In deed, Munn v, Worrell, 53 N. Y. 44. 

In statute, Wallingtpn v. White, 10 C. B. (N. S.) 134 ; Vantilburgh v. 
Shann, 4 Zabr. 740 ; Blackstone v, Comm'rs, 108 Mass. 69 ; Harding 
V, Inhabitants, 10 Mete. 406; Shepherdson v. Inhabitants, 13 Mete. 
59; Reg. t/. Turnpike Road, 3 El. & Bl. 1002; Chase v, American 
Steamboat Co., !o R. I. 79; Waterford v, Oxford Co., 59 Me. 450; 
Queen v. Chart, L. R., i C. C. R. .237 ; Love ridge v, Hodsoll, 2 B. 
& Ad. 618 ; Cleaves v, Jordan, 34 Me. 9 ; Pickard v. Howe, 12 Mete. 
198 ; Glass v. State, 30 Ala. 529. 

public . Imlay v. Union Branch R. Co., 26 Conn. 254 ; U. S. %», 

King, I Cranch C. C. 444; U. S. v, Schwartz, 4 Id. 160; U. S. v, 
Emery, Id. 270. 

In statute, Osmond v, Widdicombe, 2 B. & Aid. 50 ; Comer v. State, 



HIGH W A Y. 



Z64 



HOML 



HIGHWAYS. 
HTM. 



HIBS. 



HIBING. 



Contiaued. 

62 Ala. 330 ; Meyer v, R. Co., 3s Mo. 352 ; State v, Davis, 68 N. C. 
297 ; Craig v. People, 47 111. 487 ; State v, Johnson, Phill. (L.) 140; 
Northumberland v. Atlantic, etc., R. Co., 35 N. H. 374 ; Walton v. 
R. Co., 67 Mo. 56. 

In statute. Flint, etc., R. Co. v, Gordon, 41 Mich. 420. 

made l^ . In discharge, Lathrop v, Tilden, 8 Cusb. 37$. 

Blanchard v. Blackstone, 102 Mass. 347. 

In statute. Crow v, Beardsley, 68 Mo. 435. 

and reward. In plea, Harris v, Phillips, 10 C. B. 655. 

agreement fbr the of any laborer. In stattite. Wilson v. Zu- 

lueti, 14 Q. B. 405. 

King 2^. Inhabitants, i B. & Ad. 727. 

In insurance policy. Meis v. Franklin Ins. Co., 68 Mo. 127 ; Foule v. 

Springfield Ins. Co., 122 Mass. 194. 
In statute. Rex v. Smith, Russ. & Ry. 267 ; U. S. v, Mullany, i Cranch 

C. C. 517. 

In will. Doe v. Dodd, 5 B. & Ad. 689. 

commercial paper. In statute. Re Clemens, 2 Dill. $33- 

crop of flax. In contract, Goodrich v. Stevens, 5 Lans. 230. 

house. In insurance policy. Hough v. City Fire Ins. Co., 29 

Conn. 10. 
In statute. Com. v. Hadley, 1 1 Mete. 72. 

Metropolitan Asso. v.. Petch, 5 C. B. (N. S.) 508. 

In libel. Broome v. Gosden, i C. B. 729. 

In contract. Whitson v. Culbertson, 7 Ind. 195. 

In statute. Lavender zc State, 60 Ala. 60 ; Shubrlck v. State, 2 S. C. 
21. 

In deed. Hurst v. Hurst, 7 W. Va. 289. 

In statute. Bank of Michigan v. Niles, i Doug. 401 ; Lasure v. Hille- 
gas, 7 S. & R. 313 ; Chautaqua Co. Bk. v. Risley, 4 Denio, 480. 

occupy, possess or eigoy. In statute. Queen v. Water-works, 

18 Q. B. 703. 
to involuntary service. In statute. U. S. v. Ancarola, 17 

Blatchf. 425. 

Bowling V. Harrison, 6 How. 248. 

of shares. In statute. Wilkerson t/. Anglo Cal. Co., 18 Q. R 

728; Stewart V. Same, 18 Q. B. 737. 

of stock. In statute. Crease v. Babcock, 10 Mete 525 ; Grew 

V. Beld, 10 Mete. 568. 

State V. Murray, 28 Wis. 99. 

In statute. Godfrey v. Godfrey, 17 Ind. 6. 

shares. In statute. Queen v. Government Stock Co., 3 Q. B. 

Div. 442. 

to baiL Vose v. Deane, 7 Mass. 283. 

persons office* In statute. Nicholson v. Ellis, i El. B. & El 278. 

Re Worthington, 14 Bank. Reg. 388 ; Rogers v. Brooks, 30 Ark. 613 ; 
Phillips V. Innes, 4 CI. & F. 234. 

In statute. Jefferson v. Washington, 19 Me. 293; Turner z/. Buckfield. 
3 Me. 229; Exeter t/. Brighton, 15 Me. 98. 



HOABDnra. 
HOCIT88ED. 

HOG. 



HOLD. 



HOLDER. 



HOLDING. 



HOICE. 



HOME. I6S HOSTILITIES. 

HOME— Continued. 

and maintenaiioe. In wilL Parker v. Parker, 126 Mass. 433. 

port. St lago de Cuba, The, 9 Wheat. 409 ; The Albany, 4 Dill. 

439. 

while they remain at , In mil. Manning v. Wolf!, 2 Dev. & 

B. 12. 

HOMESTEAD. Re Leeds, 51 N. H. 253; Austin v, Stanley, 46 N. H. 52; Gregg v. 

Bostwick, 33 Cal. 220 ; Cook v. McChristian, 4 Cal. 23 ; Tumlinson 
V, Swinney, 22 Ark. 400; Boyle v, Shulman, 59 Ala. 566; Ackley v. 
Chamberlain, 16 Cal. 181 ; Hoitt v. Webb, 36 N. H. 158; Stanley z/^ 
Greenwood, 24 Tex. 224 ; Philleo v, Sraalley, 23 Tex. 502 ; Iken v. 
Olenich, 42 Tex. 198. 

In statute, Upman z/. Second Ward Bk., 15 Wis. 453; Bunker v. 
Locke, 15 Wis. 638 ; Fogg v, Fogg, 40 N. H. 287 ; Phelps v. Rooney» 
9 Wis. 84. 

In will Fearing v. Swift, 97 Mass. 415; Backus v. Chapman, iii 
Mass. 386 ; Hopkins v. Grimes, 14 Iowa, 73. * 

form. In deed. Woodman v. Lane, 7 N. H. 241 ; Taylor v, Mix- 

ter, II Pick. 347; Aldrich t^. Gaskill, 10 Cush. 158. 

HONOBABIUM. McDonald v. Napier, 14 Ga. 89. 

HONOBED. when the bills are duly . In letter. Lucas v, Groning, 7 Taunt. 

164. 

no present of reoovery. Queen v. Jenkins, L. R., i C. C. R. 187. 

I am in . In contract. Smith v. Thorne, 18 Q. B. 134. 

HOBH. chaana. In contract. Sweet v. Shumway, 102 Mass. 368. 

State V. Ingram, 16 Kas. 14. 

In statute. Robert v. Adams, 38 Cal. 384 ; Owens v. State, 38 Tex. 555 ; 
I^inley v. State, 3 Humph. 323; Cobbs v. Coleman, 14 Tex. 594; 
Dearborn «/. Phillips, 21 Tex. 449; Jordt v. State, 31 Tex. 571; 
Baldwin v. People, i Scam. 304 ; Reg. v, Aldridge, 4 Cox C. C. 143 ; 
Pierson v. State, 3 Tex. (App.) 223 ; Allison v. Brookshire, 38 Tex. 199. 

stealer. In libel. Mountney v. Walton, 2 B. & Ad. 679. 

gelding or more. In statute. Rex v. Welland, i Russ. & Ry. 494. 

mule or yoke of oxen. In statute. Richardson v. Duncan, 2 

Heisk. 220. 

fkurm . Tipton v. Pickens, 1 Swan, 25. , 

plow . Matthews v. Redwine, 25 Wis. 99. 

work . In statute. Noland v. Wickham, 9 Ala. 169 ; Allman v. 

Gann, 29 Ala. 242. 

In statute. State v. Dunnavant, 3 Brevard, 9 (5 Am. Dec. 530) ; Lover- 
ing V. Stone, 2 B. & C. 518. 

and oattle* In statute. Toledo, etc., R. Co. v. Cole, 50 111. 184. 

mules or cattle. In statute. U. S. v. Mattock, 2 Sawy. 148. 

In contract. Washing Machine Co. v. Earle, 3 Wall. Jr. 321. 

In statute. King v. Inhabitants, 4 B. & Aid. 505. 

In will. Re Altchin, L. R., 14 Eq. Cas. 230. 

or asylums. In statute. Appeal Tax Court v, St. Peter's 

Academy, 50 Md. 321. 

in the Black sea. In insurance policy. Avery v. Bowdens, s 



El. & Bl. 714- 



HOSTILITIES. 



z66 



HOUSE 



nOTCHPOFr. 



HOUBS. 



HOUSB. 



— Continued. 

oonaequenoes of . In insurance policy, lonides v. Union Ins. 

Co., 14 C. B. (N. S.) 295. 

Thompson v, Carmichael» 4 N. Y. Leg«Obs. 134; 3 Sandf. Ch. lao; 
Walton V, Walton, 14 Vesey, 323. 

In statute, Cromwell v, Stephens, 3 Abb. Pr. (N. S.) 26 ; 2 Daly, 1 5 ; 

Kelly V, Excise Commr's, 54 How. Pr. 330. 
keeper. In statute. King v. Simmonds. 1 H. L. Cas. 754. 

purposes. In deed. Allen v, Howe, 105 Mass. 241. 

flundly . Musgrove v. Sherwood, 54 How. Pr. 338. 

witliintwenty-fbur —^> after the acliadioation. In statute. Queen 
V, Justices, 17 L. J. iii. 

State V. McGowan, 20 Conn. 245 ; Rex v. Donnavan, i Leach» 69 : 
Stevens v. Com., 4 Leigh, 683 ; Elsmore v, St. Breavells, 8 R & C. 
461 ; Reg. V. England, i C. & K. 533 ; Surman v. Dailey, 14 M. & W. 
181 ; Sampson v. Com., 5 W. & S. 385; Rex v. Reader, 4 C. & P. 
245 ; Hiles v. Shrewsbury, 3 East, 457 ; Wallace v. Young, 5 T. B. 
Mon. 155 ; State v. Sandy, 3 Ired. 570; State v. Terry, 4 Dev. & B. 
185 ; State v. Stewart, 6 Conn. 47 ; Chapman v. Com., 5 Whart. 427 ; 
Gage V. Shelton, 3 Rich. 342 ; Trinity Church, v, Boston, 118 Mass. 
167; People V, Stickman, 34 Cal. 342 ; State v. Garity, 46 N. H. 61 ; 
State V. Powers, 36 Conn. 77. 

In constitution. Re Executive Communication, 12 Fla. 653; South- 
worth V. Jackson, etc., R. Co., 2 Mich. 287 ; Green v. Weller, 32 
Miss. 651 ; State v. McBride, 4 Mo. 303 (29 Am. Dec. 636). 

In deed. Fox v. Clarke, L. R., 7 Q. B. 748 ; Doe v. Collins, 2 T. R. 
498 ; Schenck v. Campbell, 11 Abb. Pr. 292. 

In indictment. State v. Mann, 31 Conn. 372; Thompson v. People, 3 
Park. C. C. 208 j Com. v. Posey, 4 Call. 109. 

In insurance policy. Workman v. Ins. Co., 2 La. 507 (22 Am. Dec 141); 
Elmaker v. Franklin Ins. Co., 5 Pa. St. 183. 

In statute. Cook v. Humber, 1 1 C. B. (N. S.) 46 ; Wilson v. Roberts, 
1 1 C. B. (N. S.) 53 ; Henrette v. Booth, 1 5 C. B. (N. S.) 500 ; Powell v. 
Price, 4 C. B. 1 14 ; Daniel v. Coulsting, 7 M. & G. 122 ; Cook v. Hunter, 
1 1 C. R 47 ; Wilson v. Roberts, 1 1 C. B. 53 ; State v. Powers, 36 Conn. 
77 ; Rawson v. State, 19 Conn. 292 ; Angell v. Paddington Vestry, 3 Q. 
B. 714; re Creek, 3 B. & S. 459; Callaghan v. State, 41 Tex. 43: Richards 
V. Swansea Imp. Co., 9 Ch. Div. 425 ; Nevills v. State, 7 Coldw. 82 ; 
People V. Stickman, 34 Cal. 242 ; Elsmore v. St. Brianels, 8 B. & C. 
461 : Reg. V, England, i C. & K. 533 ; Rex v. Donnovan, 2 W. Bl. 
683; Folkstone v. Woodward, L. R.. 15 Eq. 159; State v. Barr, 39 
Conn. 41 ; Queen v. Manning, L. R.. 1 C. C. R. 340 ; Rex v. Winter, 
I Russ. & Ry. 296 ; Nunn v, Dickson, 7 Man. & G. 70 ; Daniel v. 
Coulsting, 7 Man. & G. 122. 

In will. Rogers v. Smith, 4 Pa. St. 93 ; Common Council v. State, 5 
Ind. 334. 

and garden. In deed. Baxter v. Brand, 6 Dana, 297. 

oonneotions. In statute. Cordeman v. City of Cincinnati, 23 Ohio 

St. 499. 

of entertainment. In statute. Bonner v. Welbum, 7 Ga. 296. 

of ill-ftune. In city by-law. McAllister v. Black, 33 Conn. 91. 



HOUSE. 167 HOUSE, 

HOUBB— Continued. 

In statute, Cadwell v. State* 17 Conn. 472 ; Com. v. Wood, 97 Mass. 
228; State V. Mullen, 35 Iowa, 199; Dodge v, Lacey, 2 Ind. 212. 

or other place of public resort for the public perfbrmance 

of stage plays. In statute. Davys v, Douglas, 4 Hurl. & N. 181. 

or place where liquors are retailed. In statute. Phillips v. 

State, 51 Ala. 20. 

store and shop. In complaint, Rawson v. State, 19 Conn. 293. 

within fifty fbet of a railway. In statute. Walker v. R. Co., 



3 Q. B. 750. 

counting . In statute, Purcey v. McLean, L. R., 5 C. P. 252; 

re Creek, 3 B. & S. 459. 

disorderly . In statute. Queen v. Rice, L. R., i C. C. R. 21 ; 

Killman v. State, 2 Tex. (App.) 222 (28 Am. Rep. 432) ; State v. 
Powers, 36 Conn. 37 ; State v. Maxwell, 33 Conn. 259 ; City of Em- 
poria z^. Volmer, 12 Kas. 622. 

dwelling • Com. v. Pennock, 3 S. & R. 199 ; Daniel v. Coulsting, 

7 M. & G. 122 ; Surman v, Dailey, 14 M. & W. 181 ; Com. v. Posey, 

4 Call. 109 ; Powell v. Price, 4 C. B. 105 ; Rex v. Harris, 2 Leach, 
701 ; Rex V. Thompson, 2 Leach, 771 ; State v. Warren, 33 Me. 30; 
Com. V. Barney, 10 Cush. 478; Hooker v. Com., 13 Gratt. 763; 
State V. Clark, 7 Jones, 167; Rex v. Lyons, i Leach, 185; Rex v. 
Fuller, I Leach, 186; Rex v, Davies, 2 Leach, 876; Nutbrown's 
Case, 2 East P. C. 496 ; Reg. v. Martin, Russ. & Ry. 108 ; ex parte 
Vincent, 26 Ala. 145 ; Rex v. Turner, 6 C. & P. 407 ; Rex v. Brown, 
2 East P. C. 501 ; Rex v. Flannagan, Russ. & Ry. 187 ; Rex v. Gib- 
bons, Russ. & Ry. 442 ; State v. Meerehouse, 34 Mo. 344 ; Rex v. 
Smith, 2 East P; C. 497 ; Rex v. Jenkins, Russ. & Ry. 244 ; Rex v. 
Ball, I Moody, 30; State v, Clark, 42 Vt 629; Markham v. State, 25 
Ga. 52; Hollister v. Com., 60 Pa. St. 103; People v. Stickman, 34 
Cal. 342 ; Reg. v. Baker, 3 Cox C. C. 581 ; Reg. v. Smith, i Moody 
& R. 256; State V. Jake, i Winst. 80. 

In statute. Com. v. Barney, 10 Cush. 498 ; Hooker t/. Com., 13 Gratt. 763 ; 
McLane v. State, 4 Ga. 335 ; State v. Sutcliffe, 4 Strobh. 372 ; Wood- 
ford V. People, 62 N. Y. 117; Com. v. Posey, 4 Cal. 109; Com. v. 
Buzzell, 16 Pick. 153; People 7/. Cotteral, 18 Johns. 15; People v- 
Orcutt, I Park. C. C. 252; Reg. v. Fletcher, 2 C. & K. 215; State 
V. Walfenberger, 20 Ind. 242 ; Com. v. Eastabrook, 10 Pick. 293 ; 
Queen v. People, 71 N. Y. 561 (27 Am. Rep. 87) ; State v. McGowan* 
20 Conn. 246 ; re Lammer, 14 Bank. Reg. 460 ; State v. Troth, 24 N. 
J. (L.) 377 ; Fire Department v. Butler, 33 How. Pr. 378; Cuthbert- 
son V. Harris, L. R., 4 C. P. 525 ; Same v, Butterworth, L. R., 4 C. 
P. 523 ; Thompson v. Ward, L. R., 6 C. P. 327 ; Brice v. Cloutman, 
45 N. H. 37 ; Rex v. Stock, i Russ. & Ry. 185 ; Rex v, Flannagan, i 
Russ. h Ry. 187 ; Rex v. Martin, 1 Russ. & Ry. 108 ; Rexz/. Wilson, 
I Russ. & Ry. 115 ; Rex v. Hancock, i Russ. & Ry. 171. 

inhabited dwelling . In statute. People v. Cotteral, 18 Johns. 

115; Com. V. Posey, 4 Call. 109. 

part of the • In statute. Mason v. R. Co., L. R., 6 Eq. Cas. loi. 

public • In statute. Skinner v. State, 30 Ala. 524. 

reoeiving . In statute. Syms v. Chaplin, 5 Ad. h. El. 644. 



HO USEHOLD. l68 /. 

HOUSEHOIJ). ftLmiture. Tanner v. Billings, i8 Wis. 164. 

In statute. Weed v, Dayton, 40 Conn. 293 ; Towns z/. Pratt, 33 N. U. 

345- 
In will. Hooper's Appeal, 60 Pa. St 220; Richardson v. Hall, 124 
Mass. 228 ; McMicken v. Directors, 2 Am. L. Reg. N. S. 489 ; Le 
Farrent v, Spencer, i Ves. Sr. 97 ; Bunn v. Winthrop, i Johns. Ch. 
329; Gooch V. Gooch, 33 Me. 535. 

ftimiture neoessary for supportmg life. In statute. Hitch- 
cock V, Holmes, 43 Conn. 528 ; Crocker v. Spencer, 2 D. Chip. 68 (15 
Am. Dec. 650) ; Montague v, Richardson, 24 Conn. 338 ; Haswel! z/. 
Parkins, 1 5 Cal. 266. 

— ^> ftLmiture neoeBsary fbr the debtor and faiB ftonily . In statute. 

Davlin v. Stone, 4 Cush. 359. 

goods. Com. V. Steinbeck, 3 Rawie, 341 (24 Am. Dec. 351). 

In will, Carnagy 2/. Woodcock, 2 Munf. 234; Stubbs v, Stubbs, i H. 
& C. 258; Dayton v, Tillon, i Robt. 21. 

goods and ftimiture. In will. Carnagy v. Woodcock, 2 Munf. 

234 (5 Am. Dec. 470). 

HOUSEHOIaDEB. Viele 7/. Koch, 27 III. 129; Woodward v, Murray, 18 Johns. 401 ; 

Griffin v. Sutherland, 14 Barb. 456 ; Brown v. Witt, 19 Wend. 475. 

In statute. Greenwood v. Maddox, 27 Ark. 660; Hutchinson v. Cham- 
berlain, II N. Y. Leg. Obs. 248; Cantrell v. Connor, 51 How. Pr. 
45 ; Bowman v. Quackenboss, 3 Code R. 17 ; Aaron v. State, 37 Ala. 
106; Somerset Sav. Bk. v. Huyck, 33 How. Pr. 323; Kramer v. 
Clatsop Co., 6 Oregon, 238 ; King v. Hall, i B. & C. 136; King «/. 
Poynder, i B. & C. 180; Robles v. State, 5 Tex. (App.) 346. 

HOUSEKEEPEB. Lewis v. Blinton, 7 C. B. 102. 

In statute. Gunn v. Gudehus, 1 5 B. Mon. 447 ; Seaton %». Marshall, 6 
Bush, 429; Vielez/. Koch, 27 111. 129. 

HOUSES. In statute. Surman v. Dailey, 14 M. & W. 182. 

and buildings. In statute. Peto v. Overseers, 2 El. & EL 1 58. 

fix>nting 8u6h street. In statute. London School Bd. v. St. 

Mary, i Q. B. Div. 70. 

of religiouis worship. In statute. Proprietors of Meeting- 



house t^. City of Lowell, i Mete. 541 ; Lefevre v, Detroit, 2 Mich. 586 ; 
Trinity Church v. Boston, 118 Mass. 164. 

. In deed. Cornish v. Claiffe, 3 H. & C. 450. 



HIJBT. molested or restrained in his person or estate. In cansiiiu^ 

tion. Thurston v. Whitney, 2 Cush. 1 10 ; Flockestein v. Mayor, 40 
Ala. 727. 

HIJSBAND. Reed v. Reed, 70 Me. 156; Hyde v. Hyde, L. R., i P. & D. 133. 

In statute. People v. Hovee, 5 Barb. 117. 

ship's . Gillespie v. Winberg, 4 Daly, 318. 

HYBBATJLIC. ram, wheel, or other prooess forcing water. In deed. Rich- 
ardson V. Clements, 89 Pa. St. 503 (33 Am. Rep. 784). 

HYPOTHECATION. Ex parte Willcocks, 7 Cow. 402 (17 Am. Dec. 525) ; Whitney zr. 

Pray, 25 Ark. 22. 

I. — hereby engage. In contract. Shipton v. Thornton, 9 Ad. h. El. 

315- 
promise to i>ay» In note. Hall v. Smith, i B. & C. 408. 

will see you paid. In contract. Oldfield v. Lowe. 9 B. & C. 77. 



ICE. 



169 



IMMEDIA TE. 



ICE. 

mmnxPY. 

IDIOCY. 

IP. 



detention by 



In charter-party, Hudson v, Ede, L. R., 2 Q. B. 



567; 3 0- B, 412. 

In statute. Mechanics* Planing Mill Co. v. Nast, 7 Mo. (App.) 149. 

Owing's Case, i Bland Ch. 370 (17 Am. Dec. 311). 

hongv. Swindell, 77 N. C. 176; Damon v, Damon, 8 Allen, 195. 

In deed, Owen v. Field, 102 Mass. 107 ; Long v, Swindell, il N. C. 176. 

In will, Colt 7/. Hubbard, 33 Conn. 281. 

any. Sudding v. Eyles, 9 Q. B. 860. 

any remains at her decease. In will, McKenzie's Appeal, 41 

Conn. 607. 

any thing should remain. In will, Paine v, Barnes, 100 Mass. 



471. 



desired. In notice, Schmaire v. Maxwell, 3 Blatchf. 410. 
it is deemed best. In will. Chandler v. Rider, 102 Mass. 271. 
In will. Yearnshaw's Appeal, 25 Wis. 25. 



IGKOMINY. In statute. Brown v, Kingsley, 38 Iowa, 220. 

IGNORAKCE. Sunol v, Hepburn, i Cal. 250 ; Boylan v. Meeker, 28 N. J. (L.) 274. 

IGNOBAHT. 

ILL. 



of the name. In statute, Rosencranz v, Rogers, 40 Cal. 491. 



ZLLEGAI.. 



In statute. Queen v, Wellings, 3 Q. B. Div. 426. 

oondnot. In statute. Doe v. Roe, 23 Hun, 19. 

&me. Boyle v. State, 46 Ala. 206. 

so as not to be able to travel. In statute. Queen v. Farrell. 2 

C. C. R 118. 

Chadboume v, Newcastle, 48 N. H. 196; State z/.'Ha3rworth, 3 Sneed, 
64 ; People v, Kelly, i Abb. Pr. N. S. 432 ; Palmer v. Concord, 4& 
N. H. 211. 

or improper oondnot. In statute, Chadbourne v, Newcastle^ 

48 N. H. 199; Palmer v. City of Concord, 48 N. H. 211. 

Ex parte Schwartz, 2 Tex. (App.) 74. 

voting. In statute. State v, Heyworth, 3 Sneed, 64. 



ILLEQITIMA.TE. In statute. Miller v. Miller, 18 Hun, 507. 

ohild. In statute, Curtis v. Hewins, 1 1 Mete. 294. 

TT.T.TffFP. trade* In marine policy, Cucullu v, Louisiana Ins. Co., 5 Mart. 

N. S. 464 (16 Am. Dec.]i99). 

ILLmjsbS. Kelly v. Ancient Order of Hibernians, 10 Rep. 151. 

XMHATEBIAIi. allegation. Whitwell z^. Thomas, 9 Cal. 499 ; Green v. Palmer^ 

15 Cal. 411. 

IMBECHilTY. Owing*s Case, i Bland Ch. 370 (17 Am. Dec. 311). 

^lATE. In stcUute, State v. Lean, 9 Wis. 295 ; Pybus v, Mitford, 2 Lev. 77. 

and individual behalf. In statute. Columbine v. Penhall, 15 

Q. B. 132. 

benefit. In statute, Butler v, Patterson, 13 N. Y. 292. 

danger. In statute, Bailey v. Com., 11 Bush, 688. 

delivery. In statute, Neldon v. Smith, 36 N. J. (L.) 148 ; Rich- 
ardson V, End, 43 Wis. 316; Helper v. State, 43 Wis. 479. 

issue. In statute, Turley v, Turley, 1 1 Ohio St. 173. 

notioe. In policy of insurance, K nickerbocker Ins. Co. v, Gould,. 

80 111. 388. 

22 



MM ED I A TE, VJO IMPLEMENTS, 

IMMEDIATE — Continued. 

payment. In guaranty. Oldershaw v. King, 2 Hurl. & N. 403; 

2 Hurl. & N. 524. 

panuit. In statute. People v. Pool, 27 Cal. 572. 



Burgess v, Boetefur, 7 M. & G. 481 ; McLure v, Colclough, 17 Ala. 
89; Sardis v, Howell, 31 N. J. (L.) 313; People v. Woodruff, 32 N. 
Y. 377; Streeter V. Streeter, 43 III. 155. 

In contract. Streeter v, Streeter, 43 111. 155; Fitzhugh v, Jones, 6 
Munf. 83. 

In indictment. State v. Rickey, i Mo. (App.) 6. 

In insurance policy, Rokes v, Amazon Co., 51 Md. 512. 

In statute, Grace v. Clinch, 4 Q. B. 606 ; Queen v, Alderson, i Q. & 
878 ; Arnold v, Dunsdale, 2 El. & Bl. 598 ; Queen v. Justices, 4 Q. 
B. 469; Thompson v. Gibson, 8 M. & W. 281 ; Queen v, Roberts.; 
Ad. & Ell. 433> 441 : re Blues, 5 EL & Bl. 291. 

after. In order. Hoggins v. Gorden, 3 Q. B. 466. 

afterward. In statute, Forsdike v. Stone, L. R., 3 C. P. 607. 

apprehended. In statute. Griffith v. Taylor, 2 C. P. Div. 194. 

upon demand. In deed, Toms v, Wilson, 4 B. & S. 442. 

In statute. Long v. Converse, i Otto, 112. 

nCPAIBING. In constitution, Lapsleyt/. Brashears, 4 Litt. 53; Berry z^. Ransdell. 4 

Mete. 294. 

the obligation of oontracts. In constitution. Slaughter v, Cul- 
pepper, 2$ Ga. 26; Gunn v, Barry, 15 Wall. 610; Hawthorn v. 
Calef, 2 Wall. 10 ; Dreham v. Stifle, 8 Wall. 595 ; Bronson v. Kinzie. 

1 How. 311 ; Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge, 11 Peters, 
420 ; Crawford v, Bk. of Mobile, 7 How. 279 ; Phalen v. Viiginia, 8 
How. 163 ; Planters* Bk. v. Sharp, 6 How. 301 ; West River Bridge 
Co. V, Dix, 6 How. 507; Woodruff v. Trapnall, 10 How. 190; Butler 
V, Overfield, 10 How. 402 ; Ogden v, Saunders, 12 Wheat. 213; Maison 
V, Haile, 12 Wheat. 370; Providence Bk. v, Billings, 4 Peters, 514: 
Farm. & Mech. Bk. v. Smith, 6 Wheat. 131 ; Satterleet/. Matthewson, 

2 Peters, 380; Curran v. State, 15 How. 304; State v. Wheeling 
Bridge Co., 13 How. 518 ; Watson v. Mercer, 8 Peters, 88; Sturges 
V. Crowninshield, 4 Wheat. 122; Trustees v. Woodward, 4 Whe.it. 
518 ; Walker v. Whitehead, 16 Wall. 314 ; Barlow v, Gregory, 31 
Conn. 261; Welch z/. Wadsworth, 30 Conn. 150; Bondingham v. 
Richmond, 6 Greenl. 112 (19 Am. Dec. 197); Martindale v. Moore. 

3 Blackf. 275; Lewis v, Blackenridge, i Blackf. 220 (12 Am. Dec. 
228); Penniman's Case, 13 Otto, 718 ; People^/. Roper, 35 N. Y. 629: 
Hicks V, Hotchkiss, 7 Johns. Ch. 297 (i i Am. Dec. 472) ; Jones v. 
Crittenden, i Car. Law Repos. 385 (6 Am. Dec. 531). 

nCPAIVEL. Porter v. People, 7 How. Pr. 441. 

IMPABTTATiTiY. fbithfUlly, ftirly and . In statute. Perry v. Thompson, 16 

N. J. (L.) 72; Mayor v. Evans, 31 N. J. (L.) 342. 

nCPASSAfiliE. public highway. Armstrong v. St. Louis, 3 Mo. (App.) isr. 

Bryant v. Gledden, 36 Me. 36 ; Baker v, Robinson, 49 111. 299. 

legal . In statute. Donker v. People, 37 Mich. 4. 

Keeler v. Green, 21 N. J. (Eq.) 27. 

King V. Ld. Yarborough, 3 B. & C. 107. 

IMPLEMENTS. Tannery. Billings, 18 Wis. 164. 

of gaming. In statute, Coolidge v, Choate, 1 1 Mete. 79. 



IMPLEMENTS. V]\ IMFROVED^ 



IMFLEMSNTB -- Continued. 

of husbandry. In statute, Reg. v. Malty, 8 EI. & Bl. 715. 

-^ — of the debtor's trade. In statute, Tomlinson v, Ousatonic 
Water Co.» 44 Conn. 98; Seeley v, Gwillem, 40 Conn. 106; Atwood 
V, De Forrest, 19 Conn. 513; Wallace v, Collins, 5 Ark. 41 ; Euscoe 
V. Dunn, 44 Conn. 93. 

proper tools or of a flffmer. In statute, Meyer v, Meyer, 23 

Iowa, 359. 

tools and . In statute. Smith v, Gibbs, 6 Gray, 298. 

IMPLIED. malioe. Darry v. People, 10 N. Y. 120. 

DCFOBT. In statute. The Forrester, Newb. Adm. 181. 

In statute, Perojt v, U. S., Pet. C. C. 256. 

In statute, Budenbury v, Roberts, L. R., i C. P. 575 ; i Harr. & Ruth. 
836; Mayor z^. Waring, 41 Ala. 139; Kingt'. McEvoy, 4 Allen, no. 

IHFOBT8. In constitution. Woodruff z/. Parham, 8 Wall. 123; Waring z/. Mayor, 

8 Wall, no ; Low v, Austin, 13 Wall. 29; The Passenger Cases, 7 
How. 477; Marriott v. Brune, 9 How. 619; Wynne v, Wright, i 
Dev. A B. (L.) 19; Norris v. City of Boston, 4 Mete. 282. 

IMPOSTS. In constitution. Brown v. State, 12 Wheat. 419; Cooley v. Board of 

Wardens, 12 How. 299; Pacific Ins. Co. v, Soule, 7 Wall. 433 ; Worsley 
V, New Orleans, 9 Rob. (La.) 324 ; Scholey v, Rew, 23 Wall. 345. 

rMPa^ENT. In flea, Kempf v, Kempf, 34 Mo. n i . 
OfPOUJNDED. Goodsell v. Dunning, 34 Conn. 257. 

State V, Pike, 49 N. H. 399. 

device, oolor or thing. In statute, Wynan v. Lemon, 51 Cal. 

274. 

Coman v. Storm, 26 How. Pr. 84. 
In statute, Doyle v, Boyle, 19 Kas. 168. 

fbr debt. In constitution. Dean v. Smith, 23 Wis. 486. 

U. S. V, Benner, Baldw. 234; Lawson v, Bazines, 3 Harr. (Del.) 



416; Milwaukee Indust. School v. Supervisors, 40 Wis. 328. 

In statute. State v. Mayor, 39 N. J. (L.) 257. 

for debt. In constitution, Moore v. Green, 73 N. C. 394 (21 Am. 

Rep. 470) ; Harris v. Bridges, 57 Ga. 407 (24 Am. Rep. 495). 

fltlfle . Allen v, London, etc., R. Co.. L. R., 6 Q. B. 65; Harvey 

V, Maine, 6 Ir. C. L. 417; Hackett v. King, 6 Allen, 58 ; Floyd v. 
State, 12 Ark. 43 ; Crowell v, Gleason, 10 Me. 325; Colter v, Lowell. 
35 Ind. 285 ; Johnson v, Tompkins, Baldw. 371 ; Pike v, Hawson, 9 
N. H. 491 ; Smith v. State, 7 Humph. 43. 

Thompson v. Hopper, i El. B. & El. 1046. 

aot. In statute, Rogers v. Brown, 61 Mo. 187. 

navigation. In deed. Good v, London Assn., L. R., 6 C. P. 563. 

removal. In statute, Foster v, Cronkhite, 35 N. Y. 139. 

person. In libel, (Goldstein 7/. Foss, 2 Younge & J. 154. 

illegal or oonduot. In statute. Allegheny Co. v. Gibson, 90 

Pa. St. 415. 

real estate. Vandal v. Dock Co., 40 Cal. 83. 

Bond V, Fay, 8 Allen, 213. 

In statute, Wiggins v. Baptist Soc, 43 N. H. 261 ; Ross v. Smith, i B. 
& Ad. 911. 



IMPROVED, 172 IN^ 

IMPBOVED — Continued. 

lancL In statute, Clark v, Phelps, 4 Cow. 190; re Road, 68 Pa. 

St. 396. 

mode of maauflM^tiinxig gas. In patent. Hills v. London Gas- 
light Co., 5 Hurl. & N. 314.. 

method. Beard v, Egerton. 3 C. B. 126. 

rent. In statute. Lamb v, Hemans, 2 B. & Aid. 468. 



new and design. /#^ statute. Wood v, Dolby, 7 Fed. Rep. 475. 

HCPBOVISMENT. Johnson v, Gresham, 5 Dana, 547 ; Lamb v. Lamb, 11 Pick. 376. 

In statute, Collins v, Mott, 45 Mo. 100 ; Wetmore's Appeal, 91 Pa. St. 
279 ; Frederick v, Shane, 32 Iowa, 254. 

In.wtii, Fay v. Fay, i Cush. 93. . 

IMFBOVEMENTS. In constitution. Greenwood v, Maddox, 27 Ark. 660. 

In contract, Spencer v, Toby, 22 Barb. 260. 

In lease, French v. Mayor, 16 How. Pr. 220; Worthington v. War- 
rington, 8 C. B. 140; Burt V. Haslett. 18 C. B. 162; Haslett v. Burt, 
18 C. B. 893. 

In statute. Getchell v. Allen, 34 Iowa, 559: Schmidt v, Armstrong, 72 
Pa. St 355 ; Schenely*s Appeal, 70 Pa. St. 98. 

IMFBOVIDZNCE. In statute, McMahon v, Harrison, 6 N. Y. 443: Emerson v^ 

Bowers, 14 N. Y. 449 ; Cooper v, Lowerre, i Barb. Ch. 45. • 

IMFBOvunG. Greene Foundation Jnistees v, Boston, 12 Cush. 57. 

In statute. King v. Justices, 7 B. & C. 731. 

nCPUNinVE. damages. In verdict, Dillon v, Rogers, 36 Tex. 152. 

IN. Rex V. Beardmore, i Burr. 792. . 

In statute, Daggett v. State, 4 Conn. 60. 

and about. In contract, McMahon v. R. Co., 75 N. Y, 231. 

and for. Reg. v. Aldborough, 13 Q. B. 193. 

In statute. Rex v. Inhabitants, 7 Q. B. 725 ; Same v. Same, 7 Q. R 

534. 
oase of the decease. Briggs v, Shaw, 9 Allen, 517. 

oonaideration. In contract, Goward v. Waters, 98 Mass. 598. 

oonrt. Madden v. Brown, 97 Mass. 150. 

esse. Hone v. Van Schaick, 3 Barb. Ch. 488. 

execution of thss act. In statute, Thomas v, Stephenson* 2 £1. 

& Bl. 108. 

France. In will, Grou v, Grinley, 35 Conn. iii. 

ftdl. In receipt. Bard v. Wood, 3 Mete. 74, 

ftili confidence. In will, Le Marchant v. Le Merchant, L. R.^ 

18 Eq. Cas. 414. 

hand paid. In insurance policy. Pitt v, Berkshire Ins. Co., 100 



Mass. 500. 

— her own right. Merrill v, Bullock, 105 Mass. 4^. 

— or about. In order, R^. v. Inhabitants, 7 Q. B. 232. 

— I>erfect order. Foster v, Peyser, 9 Cush. 242. 

— pursuance of this act. In statute. Thomas v, Stephenson, x 
El. & Bl. 108. 

— solenui form. Kirby v. Kirby, 40 Ala. 492. 

— store. In receipt, Goodyear v. Ogden, 4 Hill, 104, 



IN. 



173 



INCOME. 



IN— Continued. 



— subBtanoe. In plea. Wright v. Clements, 3 B. & Aid. 507. 

— the oourae of. Sharpe v, Bluck, 10 Q. B. 289. 

— the rear thereof Read v, Clarke. 109 Mass. 82. 

— this state. In statute. Sarah v. State, 28 Miss. 267. 

— trust nevertheless and upon oon^dition. In deed. Sohier v. 



INABTTiITY. 



Trinity Church, 109 Mass. i. 

book-keeper office. In indictment. U. S. v. Forrest, 3 Cranch 

C. C. 60. 

Bepresentative Congress. In statute. Butler v. Hopper, i 

Wash. C. C, 500. 

In statute. Queen v. Drew, 15 Q. B. ^76. 

absence, sickness or other . In statute. Klaise v. State, 27 

Wis. 462. 

INAOCUBATE. description. In statute. Reg. v. Coward. 16 Q. B. 828 ; Rogers 

V. Lewis, 7 C. B. (N. S.) 30. 

INAFFBSCIABLE. Embrey v. Owen, 6 Ex. 353 ; Sampson v. Hoddenott, i C. B. (N, 

S.) 604, 

of acting. In statute. Reg. v. White, L. R., 2 Q. B. 558; 8 B. & 



INCAPABUB. 



S. 595. 

— to act. In deed. Re Bignold, L. R.. 7 Ch. App. 223. 



INCEST. 



mcnysRT. 



In statute. Com. v. Goodhue, 2 Mete. 193 ; People v. Rowle, 2 Mich. 
N. P. 209 ; People v. Harnden, i Park. C. C. 344 ; Noble v. State, 
22 Ohio St. 541 ; State v. Thomas, 10 Cent. L. J. 327 ; State v. 
Schaunhurst, 34 Iowa. 347 ; Baker v. State, 30 Ala. 521 ; Delaney v. 
People, 10 Mich. 241 ; Cook v. State, 11 Ga. 53. 

to any manufacturing process. In statute. Haydon v. Taylor, 

4 B. & S. 525. 

to the sale or conveyance. In statute. Doe v. Phillips, 1 1 Ad. 



DTdDENTAIi. 



& Ell. 797. 

Baltimore v. Railroad, 10 Wall. 543. 

expenses. In statute. Reclamation Dist. v. Hagar, 4 Fed. Rep. 

367. 
purposes. In statute. State v. Walfrom, 25 Wis. 468. 

other expenses. In statute. U. S. z^. Smith, i Bond, 69. 



mcLosnra. 

INCLOSUBE. 
INGLUDB. 



In deed. Campbell v. Gilbert, 57 Ala. 569. 

In statute. Taylor v. Welbey, 36 Wis. 42. 

In statute. State v. Cook. 3 Vroom. 347. 
TNCLUDINQ. In statute. The Little Ann, i Paine, 43. 

the president. In charter. Meyer v. Johnson. 53 Ala. 239. 

INCLUSIVE. In notice. Monroe v. Ack worth, i N. H. 201. 

INCOMB. Booth v. Ammerman, 4 Bradf. 129 ; ex parte McComb, 4 Bradf. 151 ; 

Reg. V. Comm'rs. 4 H. L. 450 ; Melcher v. City of Boston, 9 Mete. 77. 

In statute. Gray v. Darlington, 15 Wall. 63 ; U. S. v. Frost. 9 Int. Rev. 
Dec. 41 ; New Orleans v. Hall, 14 La. Ann. 815 ; Wilcox v. Middle- 
sex Co., 103 Mass. 544; People z/. Supervisors, 4 Hill. 20; 7 Hill, 504. 

In will. Simpson v. Moore, 30 Barb. 637. 

and produce. Sohier v. Eldridge, 103 Mass. 350. 

of the estate. Andrews v. Boyd, 5 Me. 199. 



INCOME. 174 INDEBTEDNESS. 

INCOME — Continued. 

imtil shall be realised. In catUract. Manice v, Hudson River 

R. Co., 3 Duer, 426. 

INOOMPATEBLB. another oi&oe. In statute. Regents v, Williams, 9 Gill & 

J. 365 (17 Am. Dec. 72). 

INOONVENIEirCE. Blackman v. Bainton, 15 C. B. (N. S.) 432. 

nrOONTnraSNT. in pUa, Watts V, Greenlee, 2 Dev. (L.) 1 18. 

INOOBPOBATED. bank. In statute. Com. v. Tenney, 97 Mass. so. 

oompaay. In statute, Robinson v, Bk. of Attica, 21 N. Y. 406; 

Coats V, People, 22 N. Y. 245. 

INOOBFOBEAIi. chattel. Boreel v. Mayor, 2 Sandf. 552. 

INOOBBEGT. or otherwiae unjuat. In statute. Great Western R. Co. v. 

Barlie-, 5 B. & S. 934. 

INCBEASE. the riak. In insurance policy. Crane v. City Ins. Co., 3 Fed. 

Rep. 558. 

INGBEASED. Talue. In statute, Boylan v, U. S., 10 Wall. 58. 

nrCUMBBAKCK Newcome v, Fiedler, 24 Ohio St. 463 ; Klein v. McNamara, 54 

Miss. 104;' Warner v, Rogers, 23 Minn. 34. 

In deed, Kelsey v. Renier, 43 Conn. 135. 

In insurance policy, Lockwood v, Middlesex Ins. Co., 47 Conn. 554. 

In statute. Town of Clinton v. Town of Westbrook, 38 Conn. 10; 
Schaeffer v. Weed, 8 111. 511. 

In deed. Chapman v. Kimball, 7 Neb. 399; Anon., 2 Abb. N. C. 56; 
Musgrave v, Sherwood, 54 How. Pr. 338. 

aflbotingtheeatate. In statute. Pack T/.Tarpley,9Ad.& Ell. 468. 

UNOUMBBAKCEB. In deed, Grier v, Grier, L. R., 5 H. L. 688. 

In statute, Shaeffer v. Weed, 8 III. 511. 

nrCUMBBAKCES. In deed, Prescott v. Freeman, 4 Mass. 627 (3 Am. Dec. 246) ; Chap- 

man v, Kimball, 7 Neb. 399; Spring z/. Tongue, 9 Mass. 28 (6 Am. 
Dec. I); Walker V. Denner, 5 Mo. (App.) 139; Funk t/. Voneida, 11 
S. & R. no (14 Am. Dec. 617). 

In will. Doe v, Danes, 16 {^. B. 95^. 
UNOUK. Crandall v, Bryan. 15 How. Pr. 48.' 

In bond, Scott v, Tyler, 14 Barb. 202. 

shall . In statute, U. S. v. Distillery, 11 Blatch. 255. 

ixnuuitBED. In contract. Agawam Bank v, Shever, 18 N. Y. 502. 

withizL In statute. Queen v. Inhabitants, 14 Q. B. 345. 

damages . In statute, Deyo v. Stewart, 4 Denio, loi. 

expenses . In statute, Reg. v, Kingston-on-Hull, 2 Ell. & Bl. 184. 

INDEBTED. St. Louis Perp. Ins. Co. v, Goodfellow, 9 Mo. 150 ; Grant v. Mechanics' 

Bk., 15 S. ^ R. 140; Pittsburg, etc., R. Co. v, Clarke, 29 Pa. St. 146 ; 
Sewall V, Lancaster Bk., 17 S. & R. 285. 

In statute. Re Iron Co., 2 Ch. Div. loi. 

In any form. In bank by-law, Kahn v, Bk. of St. Joseph, 70 Mo. 

262. 

INDEBTEDNESS. Mallingly v. Waulke, 2 Bradw. 169. 

In constitution. French v. City of Burlington, 42 la. 614. 

any other cause of — >- whatever. In statute, Langstafi z^. Rock, 
13 Mo. 580. 



INDECENCY. 175 INDORSE. 

mDBGSNCF. Ardery v. State, 56 Ind. 328. 
nroSCSENTLY. Reg. v. Webb, 2 C. & K. 938. 
INDEMHIF?. Weller v. Eames, 15 Minn, 461. 

In award. Peck v, Wakely, 2 McCord, 279. 
DffDElCNITY. In award. Peck v. Wakely, 2 McCord, 279^ 
INDSNT. In statute. U. S. v, Irwin, 5 McLean, 183. 

nmBNTUKB. Overseers v. Overseers, 6 N. J. (L.) 169. 

InpUa, Phillips v. Clift, 4 Hurl. & N. 173 ; Magee v. Fisher, 8 Ala. 

320. 
apprentioe by . In statute. St. Pancreas v. Clapham, 2 El. k El. 

754. 
this . In deed. Walker v. Keile, 8 Mo. 301. 

INDIA. rubber. Goodyear v. Muller, 3 Fish. Pat. Gas. 420. 

INDIAN. U. S. V. Rogers, 4 How. 567 ; i Hempst. 450 ; U. S. v. Ragsdale, i 

Hempst. 497. 

In statute. Wall v. Williams, 1 1 Ala. 826 ; Lafontaine v. Avaline, 8 
Ind. 6. 

country. In statute. Waters v. Gampbell, 4 Sawyer, 124 ; re 

Garr, 3 Sawyer, 317 ; U. S. v. Winslow, 3 Sdwyer, 337 ; Bates v. Glark, 
5 Otto, 204; U. S, V. Seveloff, 2 Sawy. 311. 

lalandB. In insurance policy. Robertson v. Glarke, i Bing. 445. 



INDIANS. Ex parte Reynolds, 5 Dill. 395. 

INDICAVIT. State v. Gummins, i Mill, 55 (12 Am. Dec. 596). 

INDICTABLE. offense. In constitution. State v. Berlin, 42 Mo. 572 ; State v. 

Gowan, 29 Mo. 330. 

INDICTMENT. Gom. v. Gillon, 2 Allen, 93. 

In constitution. Mott v. State, 29 Ark. 147 ; Wolff v. State, 19 Ohio 
St 248. 

In statute. Queen v. Ingham, 5 B. & S. 271. 

INDIFFEBSNT. State v. Pike, 49 N. H. 399. 

X>er8on8. In statute. Fox v. Hills, i Gonn. 294 ; Mitchell v. 

Kirtland, 7 Gonn. 229. 

DTDIGNITIES. In statute. Richards v. Richards, i Wnght (Pa.), 225 ; Kempf v. 

Kempf, 34 Mo. 211 ; Dwyer v. Dwyer, 2 Mo. (App.) 17. 

to the other* In statute. Hooper v. Hooper, 19 Mo. 355. 

to the person. In statute.. May v. May, 62 Pa. St. 206 ; Rose v. 

Rose, 9 Ark. 507 ; Goble v. Goble, 2 Jones (Eq.), 392 ; Erwin v. Erwin, 
4 Jones (Eq.), 82 ; Miller v. Miller, 78 N. G. 105 ; Gheatham v. Gheat- 
ham, 10 Mo. 296. 

INDnLBCTFLY. directly or . In deed. Rawlinson v. Glarke, 14 M. & W. 189. 

INDISFNNSABUB. Griswold v. Hepburn, 2 Duv. 26. 

LNDiVUDUAIi. In statute. Otis Go. v. Inhabitants, 8 Gray, 509. 

INDOOR. movables. In will. Penniman v. French, 17 Pick. 404 (28 Am. 

Dec. 309). 

Hartwell v. Hemmenway, 7 Pick. 117; Brooks v. Edson, 7 Vt. 351 ; 
Glark v. Sigourney, 17 Gonn. 511 ; Haines v. Dubois, 30 N. J. (L.) 
259; Montague v. Smith, 13 Mass. 403; Hartwell v. Hemmenway, 7 
Pick. 117 ; Gom. v. Spelman, 124 Mass. 327. 



INDORSE. 



Yjt 



INHABIT 



nnX>BRE *- Continued. 

In note, Tatum v, Bonner, 27 Miss. 760. 

In statute. Baker v, Coghlan» 7 C. B. 131. 
INDOBSED. Com. v, Butterick, 100 Mass. 12; Higgins v, Bullock, 66 111. 37. 

on tha instnunent. In statute. Brown v, Foster, 2 Mete. 152. 

INDOBSSS. in due ooune. In statute, Sackett v, Johnson, S4 Cal. 107. 

INDOB8EMENT. Clark v, Sigoumey, 17 Conn. 511 ; Bradley v, Traumel, Hempst 

164; Keller v, Williams, 49 Ind. 504; Rex v. Alscott, 6 C. & P. 408; 
Rex V, Bigg, I Stra. 18. 

INDUBITABIJB. Spencer v. Colt, 89 Pa. St. 314. 

INBUaiBIiE. State v, Murray, 28 Wis. 99. 

XNEViTABIaE. Gibson v, Muskett. 3 Man. & G. 167. 

aooident. Brosseau v, Hudson, 11 La. Ann. 427; Lucas v. The 

Swan, 6 McLean, 282 ; The Grace Girdler, 7 Wall. 196; McArthur v. 
Sears, 2i Wend. 190; Neal v. Saunderson, 3 Miss. 572; Trent Nav. 
Co. V, Wood, 4 Doug. 287 ; Central Line v. Lowe, 50 Ga. 509 ; Brown 
V. Kendall, 6 Cush. 292; Sampson v, U. S., 12 Ct. of CI. 480; The 
Brazos, 14 Blatchf. 448. 

In lease, Sauer v, Bilton, 26 W. R. 394; 7 Ch. Div. 815. 

aooidents. In bill of lading. Fowler v, Davenport, 2 1 Te . 626 ; 

Marsh v, Blythe, i McCord, 360; Marsh v, Blythe, i N. & M. 170. 

casualty. In lease, Hodgson v. Dexter, i Cranch C. C. 109; i 

Cranch, 350. 

— orime. In constitution. Com. v. Shaver, 3 W. & S. 338 ; U. S. v. 



INFAMOUS. 



IRFEBIOB. 



Maxwell, 3 Dill. 275 ; State z/. Randolph, 24 Conn. 365 ; U. %,v. Block, 
4 Sawyer, 211; U. S. t/. Baugh, i Fed. Rep. 784; People v, Sponsler, 
I Dakota, 296. 

In statute. Rex v, Hickman, i Moody, 34. 

ooxirt. In statute. Ex parte Rountree, 51 Ala. 43; Perkins v, 

Corbin, 45 Ala. 103. 

oourts. Ruckman v, Cornell, i N. Y. 505 ; Grignon v, Astor, 2 



UTFEBBED. 
INFLICTED. 



How. 319 ; ex parte Watkins, 3 Pet 193 ; Livingston v. Van Ingen. 
I Paine, 44. 

In constitution, Saunders z/. State. 55 Ala. 44. 

tribunals. In constitution. State v, Daniels, 66 Mo. 200 ; Dayey 

V. Burlington, etc., R. Co., 31 Iowa, 553. 

Morford v. Peck, 46 Conn. 384. 

injury . In statute. Com. v, McLoon, loi Mass. i. 



INFORMATiTTY. In order. King v. Inhabitants, 2 Ad. & Ell. 255. 
INFOBMATION. Goddard v. State, 12 Conn. 448. 

In constitution. State v. Vail, 53 Mo. 97. 

In statute, Hopkins v, Crowe, 4 Ad. & El. 778. 

give . In offer of reward. Smith v, Moore, i C. B. 438. 



INFOBMED. 



Tn statute. Re Kelly, 39 Conn. 162. 

giving . In statute, U. S. v, Whittier, 5 Dill. 35. 

and believes. In affidavit, Turnage v. Fish. 22 Ark. 287. 



INFOHMBE. In statute. Rex v, Teasdale, 3 Esp. 68 ; Bradley v. U. S.. 1 2 Ct. of CI. 578 

TNHABIT. In statute. Queen v. Inhabitants, 7 Q. B. 534; Reg. v, Coldicate, 17 

Q. B. 54; Doune v. Martyr, 8 B. ^ C. 69; King v. Inhabitants, 3 B. 
& Ad. 418; 3 B. & Ad. 423. 



INHABIT. 177 INJURIOUSLY, 

INHABrr — Continued. 

oeaM to • Ih statute. Queen v. Inhabitants, 2 Q. B. 448. 

JJIHABTFAirr. Chilton v, London, 7 Ch. Div. 735; Thayer v. City of Boston, 124 

Mass. 132; Sears v. City of Boston, i Mete. 251 ; Picquet v. Swan, 

5 Mason, 35; Bamet's Case, i Dallas, 153. 

In constituiion. Opinion of the Justices, 122 Mass. 594; 5 Mete. 587; 
7 Mass. 523. 

In statute. King v. Hall, i B. & C. 136 ; King v. Poynder, i B. & C. 180 ; 
Durantf^. Carter, L. R., 9 C. P. 261 ; Queen v. Inhabitants, i Q. B. 
41 1 ; King v. Inhabitants, 4 B. & C. 960 ; School Dist. v. Pollard, 55 N. 
H. 503 ; Bishop v. Vose, 27 Conn. 9 ; Lyle v. Foreman, i Dallas, 480 ; 
Spragins v, Houghton, 3 111. 377: Board v, Davenport, 40 111. 197; 
Ishara V, Gibbons, i Bradf. 69; State v, Ross, 23 N. J. (L.) $17; U. 
S. V. Penelope, 2 Pet. Adm. 6r ; Bell v. Pierce, 48 Barb. 51 ; Chero- 
kee Ins. Co. V, Justices, 28 Ga. 121 ; Walnut v. Ware, 13 Otto, 683. 

niHABITAlVTS. In statute. Holmes v. Oregon, etc., R. Co., 5 Fed. Rep. 523 ; Bald- 
win V. Town of North Bradford, 32 Conn. 47 ; Lee v. Boston, 2 Gray, 
484 ; Inhabitants v. Trustees Ministerial Fund, 37 Me. 369 ; Ontario 
Bk. V. Bunnell, 10 Wend. 186; Hartford Fire Ins. Co. z/. Hartford, 
3 Conn. 1 5 ; Long v. Brown, 4 Ala. 622 ; State v, Springfield Tp., 

6 Ind. 83 ; Newmarket v. Smart, 45 N. H. 87; Lyman v, Fiske, 17 
Pick. 231 (28 Am. Dee. 293). 

and oooupiers. In statute. Queen v. Wilson, 12 Ad. k Ell. 94. 

of the oity. In statute. Brown v. Fletcher, 25 Ark. 289. 

not hoiueholders. In statute. King v. Mashiter, 6 Ad. & Ell. 

153; Kingz'. Dane, 6 Ad. k Ell. 3S6. 

all the • In statute. Marlborough v. Hebron, 2 Conn. 20. 

flree • In constitution. Dred Scott v. Sandford, 19 How. 419; 

Elmendorff V. Carmiehael, 3 Littell, 472 (14 Am. Dec. 86). 

reparable by the at large. In statute. Gibson v. Mayor, L. R.^ 

5 Q. B. 218. 

HrHEBSNT. deterioration. In bill 0/ lading. The America, 8 Ben. 491. 

INHERIT. In will. Watkins v. Frederick, 11 H. L. Cas. 358. 

INHEBITER'G'. and transmitting inheritance. In statute. Bent v. St. Vraim, 

30 Mo. 268. 

LNJUHE. kill or • In statute. Oviatt v. State, 19 Ohio St.. S73. 

with intent to kill or . In statute. People v. Carmichael, 5 

Mich. 10; People z/. Edwards, 5 Mich. 22. 

LNJUKBD. Plank Road Co. v. Chamberlain, 32 N. Y. 659. 

party. People v. Howard, 17 Cal. 63. 

X>erson • In statute. Gale v. Libson, 52 N. H. 174, 

those . In statute. Morrison v. Bucksport, 67 Me. 353. 

In statute. Com. v. Sullivan, 107 Mass. 218. 

done to i>erson or property. In statute. Blass v. Str. Robt. 

Campbell, 16 Mo. 266. 

to property. Cleveland v. Barrows, 59 Barb. 364, 

to the person. In statute. Garrison v. Burdin, 40 Ala. 513. 



nrJUBIOTTBLY. affooted. In statute. Riekett v. R. Co.. L. R., 2 H. L. 175; 

Charman v. McCarthy, L. R, 7 H. L. 243; Queen v. R. Co., 14 Q. B. 

25. 
23 



INJURIOUSLY, 



178 



INNKEEPER, 



INJUBIOiraLY 



nrjuBY* 



Continued 

and wrongAilly. In indictment. State v. Vermont, etc., R. Co.» 

27 Vt. 103. 

McGune v. Palmer, 5 Robt. 607. 

oauaed by aoaident. In insurance policy, Trew v. Railway Pass. 

Ins. Co., 5 Hurl. & N. 212 ; 6 Hurl. & N. 839. 

to the property of another. In statute, Webb v. Bowler, 5 



INJUSTICE. 



INLAND. 



Jones (L.), 362. 
aoddental . In insurance policy, Fitton v, Ins. Co., 17 C. B. (N. 

S.)i34. 
bodily efiboted through external, violent and aoddental 

means. In insurance policy. Bayless v. Travelers* Ins. Co., 14 

Blatchf. 143. 

aeriouB personal . In insurance policy, Ins. Co. v, Wilkinson, 

13 Wall. 222. 

or undue delay to oreditora. In statute. Re Charlton, 6 Ch. 

Div. 45. 

bill. In statute, Mahoney v, Ashlin, 2 B. & Ad. 483. 

navigation. In statute. Moore v. Am. Trans. Co., 24 How. i. 

waters of the United States. In statute. The Cotton Plant, 



INMATE. 
INMATES. 

INN. 



10 Wall. 577. 

In statute. Mason v. Bibby, 2 H. & C. 881. 

of the oounty infirmary. In contract. Joberson v. Santa Clara 

Co., 28 Cal. 545. 

Holder v, Soulby, 8 C. B. (N. S.) 255 ; Kisten v, Hildebrand, 9 B. Mon. 
73; Willard z/. Reinhardt, 2 E. D. Smith, 148; Carpenter t/. Taylor, 

1 Hilt. (N. Y.) 193; Dickerson v, Rogers, 4 Humph. 182; Thompson 
V. Lacy, 3 B. & Aid. 286 ; Wintermute v, Clarke, 5 Sandf. 247 ; Pink- 
erton v. Woodward, 33 Cal. 557 ; Chamberlain v, Masterson, 26 Ala. 
371 ; Holder v, Souly, 8 J. Scott (N. S.), 254 ; Overseers v, Warner. 

3 Hill, 150;- Wailing v. Porter, 35 Conn. 183; People 9^. Jones. 54 
Barb. 311 ; Thompson v, Lacey, 3 B. & Aid. 283; Taylor v. Monnet. 

4 Duer, 116 ; Krohn v, Sweeney, 2 Daly, 200; Cromwell v, Stephens, 

2 Daly, 15 ; Beall v. Beck, 3 Cranch C. C. 666. 

In insurance policy, Pitt v. Laming, 4 Camp. 77. 

In statute. Bonner v. Welborn, 7 Ga. 296; Kelly v. Excise Comm'rs, 
54 How. Pr. 327. 

or tavern. In statute. Carscadden's Case, 2 City Hall Rec. $3- 

INNKEEPER. Wintermute v. Clarke, 5 Sandf. 242; Lyon v. Smith, Morris (la.) 184: 

Cromwell v, Stephens, 2 Daly, 15; Parker v, Flint, 12 Mod. 254; 
Dickerson v, Rogers, 4 Humph. 179; Dixon v. Birch, 8 Ex. 135: 
Com. V. Wetherbee, loi Mass. 214 ; Thompson v. Lacy, 3 B. & Ad. 
287 ; Overseers v, Warner, 3 Hill, 150 ; Southwood v. Myers, 3 Bush, 
681 ; Norcross v. Norcross, 53 Me. 163; Lyon v. Smith, i Morris, 
184; State V, Matthews, 2 Dev. & B. (L.) 424 ; Kister v, Hildebrand, 
9 B. Mon. 72 ; Howth v. Franklin, 20 Tex. 798 ; Clark v. Burns, 118 
Mass. 275. 
In insurance policy. Pitt v. Laming, 4 Camp. yj. 

In statute. Brittain v. Bethany, 31 Miss. 331 ; Kelly v. Excise 
Comm'rs. 54 How. Pr. 327. 



INNOCENT. 



179 



INSTRUCTIONS, 



HOrOGSNT. 



1NJIUJ£M1X>. 



nrSAlVITT. 



nrsoiivsirr 



party. In statute. Kimball v. Kimball, 44 N. H. 123. 
purohaaer. Livingston v. Cochran, 33 Ark. 294; Gerson v. 



Pool, 31 Ark. 90. 

Rex V. Home, 2 Cowp. 672 ; Whitsett v. Womach, 8 Ala, 466 ; Co- 
burn V. Harwood, Minor, 93; Mix v. Woodward, 12 Conn. 262; 
Sheehy v. Briggs, 2 Har. & J. 363 ; Beardsley v. Tappan, 1 Blatchf. 
588. 

Haines v. Davis, 6 How. Pr. 118. 

Jackson v. King, 4 Cow. 207 (15 Am. Dec. 354). 

In statute. Burnham v. Mitchell, 34 Wis. 117. 

State V. Wilner, 40 Wi^. 304; re Forman, 54 Barb. 274; Roswell v. 
State, 63 Ala. 308; Lee v. Lee, 4 McCord, 183 (17 Am. Dec. 722); 
Waters v. Connecticut Mut. Ins. Co., 2 Fed. Rep. 892 ; Frazer v. 
Frazer, 2 Del. Ch. 260. 

In insurance policy. Newton v. Mut Ins. Co., 76 N. Y. 426. 

Thompson v. Thompson, 4 Cush, 127 ; Herrick v. Borst, 4 Hill, 650; 
Webb V. Sachs, 15 Bank. Reg. 168 ; Driggs v. Moore, i Abb. U. S* 
440 ; Walkenshaw v. Perzel, 4 Robt. 426 ; Lee v. Kilborn, 3 G|:ay, 
594; Herald v. Scott, 2 Ind. 55; Terry v. Bank of Central New 
York, 15 How. Pr. 445; Hazleton v. Allen, 3 Allen, 114; Morrill v. 
Blackman, 42 Conn. 324. 

In statute. Thelluson v. Smith, 2 Wheat. 396 ; Bartlett v. Prince, 9 
Mass. 431 ; U. S. v. King, Wall. C. C. 12 ; Mayer v. Hillman, i Otto, 
496; 10 Blatchf. 257; Piper V. Poppenhausen, 43 N. Y. 68; Toofv. 
Martin, 13 Wall. 40 ; Buchanan v. Smith, 16 Wall. 277 ; re Bininger. 
7 Blatchf. 262; Rison v. Knapp, i Dillon, 114; Case v. Citizens' 
Bk., 2 Woods, 22; McArthur v. Chase, 13 Gratt 683; Warren v. 
Tenth Nat. Bk., 10 Blatchf. 493. 

Inslee v. Lane, 57 N. H. 454. 

In statute. Biddlescombe v. Bond, 4 Ad. & Ell. 333 ; Shears v. Rogers, 
3 B. & Ad. 371. 

In will. Montefiore v. Enthoven, L. R., 5 Eq. Cas. 35. 

' oiroumatanoea. In statute, Teale v. Younge, i Mc. & Younge, 

498. 

m 

law. Adams v. Story, i Paine, 80 ; Vanuzen v. Hazlehurst, i 

South. 192 (7 Am. Dec. 582). 

or in oontemplatioii of inaolvenoy. In statute. Rison v. 



Knapp, I Dill. 186; Martin t/. Toof, i Dill. 203; Newton v. Mutual 
* Benefit Life Ins. Co., 2 Dill. 154; Holbrook v. Bassett, 5 Bosw. 147. 

trader. Bell v. Ellis, 33 Cal. 620. 

In statute. Bennett v. Griffiths, 3 El. & £1. 471 ; Irving v. Gray, 3 
Hurl. & N. 85. 

In indictment. Lester v. State, 6 Mo. 658 ; Queen v. Brownlow, 1 1 Ad. 
& Ell. 127. 

did die. In indictment. Lester v. State, 9 Mo. 666. 

did die. In indictment. State v. Lakey, 65 Mo. 217 ; State v. 

Steeley, 65 Mo. 218. 

JJIUTIT U TIONB. In constitution. Gerke v. Purcell, 25 Ohio St. 229. 

charitable . In statute. Humphrie v. Little Sisters of the Poor, 

29 Ohio St. 201. 

UraTBTTCnOllB. Simmons v. Sisson, 26 N. Y. 264. 



INSTR UMENT. l8o INTENTION ALL K 



UNBTHUMMMT* In statute, Haag v. Howard, 55 Cal. 364. 

adapted for ooining. In statute. Com. v. Kent, 6 Mete 223. 

dooument or paper. In statute. Ptigh v. McCormack, 14 Wall. 

361. 
for the payment of money only. In statute. Coe v. Straus, 



1 1 Wis. 73. 

— in writing. In deed. Smith v. Adkins, L. R, 14 Eq. Cas. 402. 

— of gaming. In statute. Tollett v. Thomas, L. R, 6 Q. B. 516. 

— of aelBin. In statute. Trustees v. Comm'rs, 3 H. & C. 871. 

— of writing. In statute. Bowling v. Hax, 55 Mo. 446. 

-^ or engine for marlring money. In statute. Rex v. Moore, i 

Moody, 122. 

— or writing. In statute. State v. Fenly, 18 Mo. 445. 

— payable in money. Bk. of Mobile v. Brown, 42 Ala. 108. 



INSUFFICIBNT. In statute. White v. Joy. 13 N. Y. 83. 

evidenoe. Emmons v. Sheldon, 26 Wis. 648. 

■ iMwiiwA-nT.-B interest. Merritt v. Farmers' Ins. Co., 42 Iowa, 13 (20 Am. Dec. 

510, note) ; Rochford Ins. Co. z/. Nelson, 65 III. 415; Warren v. Dav- 
enport, etc., Ins. Co., 31 Iowa, 464 (7 Am. Rep. 160). 

INSUBANCE. In plea. Powers v. Butcher, 10 B. & C. 329. 

bnsiness. In statute. State v. Citizens* Benefit Assn., 6 Mo. 

(App.) 163. 

company. In statute. Com. v. Wetherbee, 105 Mass. 160. 

general . Vandenheuvel v. United Ins. Co., 2 Johns. Cas. 127. 

life . Dalby v. India, etc.. Ass. Co., 15 C. B. 365. 

special . Vandenheuvel v. United Ins. Co., 2 Johns. Cas. 127. 

niBUBED. Sanford v. Mechanics' Ins. Co., 12 Cush. S4i- 

not . In letter. Peek v. North Staffordshire, etc., R Co., i El. 

B. & El. 960. 

the . In insurance policy. Hurlburt v. Pacific Ins. Co., 2 Sumner, 

479- 
INSUBEBS. In statute. Hebden v. West, 3 B. & S. 591. 

INSUBBECn^IOK. In policy of insurance. Loehner v. Home Mut. Ins. Co., 17 Mo. 

247. 

In statute, Allegheny Co. v. Gibson, 90 Pa. St. 415. 

INTEMPEBAKGE. habitual . In statute. Burns v. Burns, 13 Fla. 369; Barber 

V. Barber, 14 Law Rep. 375. • 

INTEMFEBATE. habits. In statute. Tatum v. State, 63 Ala. 147. 

INTENDED. for sale. State v. Learned, 47 Me. 426. 

to be recorded. In deed. Penn v. Preston, 2 Rawle» 14. 

INTENDS. Wood v. Melius, 8 Allen, 434. 

INTENT. In statute. Whedbee v. Stewart, 40 Md. 414. 

to injure or defraud. In statute. U. S. v. Taintor, 11 Blatchf. 

375- 

with an . Com. v. Raymond, 97 Mass. 567. 

INTENTION'. Evans v. Gwyn, 5 Q. B. 857. 

with . In indictment. State v. Tom, 2 Jones (L.), 414. 

INTENTIONAL. In statute, Lorings v. Marsh, 6 Wall. 337. 

IN TEN TiONALL Y. neglect. In statute. Breltung v. Lindauer, 37 Mich. 317. 



INTERCOURSE. l8l INTEREST. 



IN TKBCOUBSE. Boxnal . Deane v. Aveling, i Rob. Ecc. Cas. 298. 

INTEBSST. Davis v. Roder, 53 Hi. 416 ; Dry Dock Bk. v. American Ins. Co., 3 N. 

Y. 344; Gaar v. Louisville Bk., 11 Bush, 180; Glendon Co. z/. Town- 
send, 120 Mass. 346. 

Inamiract. Granger t/. Pierce, 112 Mass. 244. 

In insurance policy, Merrill v. Ins. Co., 73 N. Y. 452. 

In statute, Reg. v, Comm'rs, L. R., 4 H. L. 450; Zeibe v, Reigart, 42 
Iowa, 229 ; Fitch v. Bates, 11 Barb. 471 ; Com. v, Keenan, 97 Mass. 
589 ; Cary v. Savings Union, 22 Wall. 39. 

In will, Kingston v, Bouverie, 7 H. L. Cas. 557. 

dividends, profits and prooeecbk In will. Hooper z/. Rossiter, 

I McClelland, 525. 

in land. In statute, Entwistle v. Davis, L. R., 4 Eq. Cas. 272 ; 



Lewis I/. Lewis, L. R,, 13 Eq. Cas. 218; Tyler v. Bennett, 5 Ad. & 
Ell. 377 ; Mechelin v, Wallace, 7 Ad. & Ell. 57. 

— in lands. In statute, Kingsley v, Holbrook, 45 N. H. 313. 

— in or oonoeming lands. In statute, Donellan v. Read, 3 B. & 
Ad. 904. 

— in the event. In statute. Booth v. Hart, 43 Conn. 485. 

— for good-will. In statute. Ex parte Farlow, 2 R & Ad. 347. 

— of the insured. In statute, Hatford v, Kymer, 10 B. & C. 729. 

— rents and profits. In deed. Ladd v. Ladd, 8 How. 10. 
thenceforth to aoorue due. In deed, Atkinson v, Jones, 2 Ad. 



6 Ell. 445. 

any in or oonoeming them. In statute, Evans v, Roberts, 5 

B. & C. 829; Smith t/. Burn ham, 3 Sumn. 435 ; Hughes z/.- Moore, 7 
Cranch (N. S.), 176; Simms t/. Killian, 12 Ired. (N. C.) 252; Soppin 
V, Lomas, 16 C. B. 145 ; Richards v. Richards, 9 Gray (Mass.), 313 ; 
Whiting V, Butler, 29 Mich. 122; Grover v. Buck, 34 Mich. 519; 
Daniels v, Bailey, 43 Wis. 566; Hosford v. Carter, 10 Abb. (N. Y.) 
Pr. 452; Scott V, McFarland, 13 Mass. 309; Marble v. Marble, 5 N. 
H. 374 ; Kelley v, Stanbery, 13 Ohio, 408 ; Agate v, Gignoux, i Rob. 
(N. Y.) 278; Massey V. Johnson, i Exch. 255; Williams t/. Williams, 

7 Rep. 656; Odell v, Montross, 68 N. Y. 499; Clark v, Condit. 18 
N. J. (Eq.) 358 ; Van Keuren v, McLaughlin, 19 N. J. (Eq.) 187 ; re 
Betts, 7 Rep. 522; Cowles v. Marble, 37 Mich. 158; Pomeroy v, 
Winship, 12 Mass. 513 ; Hogg v, Wilkins, i Grant (Pa.), 167 ; Griffin 
V, Coffey, 9 B. Mon. 452; Finney v, Finney, i Wils. 34; White v. 
White, I Harr. (N. C.) 252 ; Keeler v, Tatnell, 3 Zab. (N. J.) 162 ; 
Hall V, Hall, 2 McCord (S. C), Ch. 269 ; Shotwel v, Sedam, 3 Ohio, 
5; Gordon v, (rordon, 56 N. H. 170; Madigan v, Walsh, 22 Wis. 
501 ; Wright v, De Groff, 14 Mich. 164; Martin v, Wharton, 38 Ala. 
637 ; Leupers v. Henke, 73 111. 405 ; Copper Hill Min. Co. v. Spen- 
cer, 25 Cal. 18 ; Anonymous, i Vent. 361 ; Poultney v. Holmes, i 
Stra. 405 ; Edge v, Strafford, i Crom. & J. 391 ; S. C, i Tyrw. 93 ; 
Delano v, Montague, 4 Cush. (Mass.) 42 ; Stackberger v, Mostaeler, 
4 Ind. 461 ; Young v, Drake, 5 N. Y. 463 ; Wright v, Stavert, 2 El. 
& E. 721 : Vielie v, Osgood, 8 Barb. (N. Y.) 130 ; Barnard v. Whip- 
ple, 29 Vt. 401 ; Buttemere v, Hayes, 5 Mees. & W. 456 ; Smith v. 
Tombs, 3 Jur. 72; Smart v. Harding, 15 C. B. 652; Howard v, Eas- 
ton, 7 Johns. 205 ; Lower v. Winters, 7 Cow. 263 ; Storms v, Sny- 
der, 10 Johns. 109 ; Onderdonk v. Lord, Hill & D. (N. Y.) 129 ; Rice 
V, Roberts, 24 Wis. 461 ; Norton v, Webb, 35 Me. 218; Coleman v. 



INTEREST. X82 INTERESTED, 

niTEBBST ~ Continued. 

Packard, i6 Mass. 39 : Gilbert v, Buckley, 5 Conn. 262 ; Ken v. 

. Shaw, 13 Johns. (N. Y.) 236; Smart v, Harding, 15 C. B. 652; Whit- 

temore v, Gibhs, 24 N. H. 484 ; Miranville v, Silverthorn, i Grant 

(Pa.), 410 ; Sutton z/. Sears, 10 Ind. 223 ; Earl of Falmouth i/. Thomas, 

1 Cromp. & M. 89 ; Vaughan v, Hancock, 3 C. B. 766 ; Hobyv. Roe- 
buck, 2 Marsh. 433 ; S. C, 7 Taunt 1 57 ; Price v. Leybum, Goie. 
109; Angell V. Duke, L. R., 10 Q. B. 174; Moigan v. Griffith, L R, 
6 Ex. 70; Beach v, Allen, 7 Hun (N. Y.), 441 ; Frear v. Harden- 
bergh, 5 Johns. 272; Benedict 7/. Beebe, 11 Johns. 14s; Mitchell v. 
Bush, 7 Cow. 185; Lower v. Winters, 7 Cow. 263; Howard v. Eas- 
ton, 7 Johns. 205; Barnes z/. Perine, 15 Barb. 249; Scoggin v. Sla- 
ter, 22 Ala. 687 ; Cassell v, Collins, 23 Ala. 676; Zickafosse v. Hu- 
lick, I Morris, 175 ; Clark v, Shultz, 4 Mo. 235 ; Forbes v. Hamilton, 

2 Tyler, 356; Green v, Vardiman, 2 Blackf. 324. 

annual . In note, Catlin v, Lyman, 16 Vt. 44. 

any therein. In deed of trust. State v, McKellop, 40 Mo. 184. 

oonventional . Miner v. Bank, i Mart. (La.) 20. 

estate and . In statute. Brant v, Robertson. 16 Mo. 129. 

estate or • In statute. King ?/. Inhabitants. 5 B. & C. 464. 

estate or in land. In statute, Powell v. Jessopp, 18 C. R 356. 

judicial . Miner?/. Bank, i Mart. (La.) 20; Fowler %*. Smith. 2 

Cal. 568. 

keeping down the . In statute, Regina v. Hutchinson, 4 El. k 

BI. 202. 

legal . Miner v. Bank, i Mart (La.) 20 ; Fowler v. Smith, 2 CaL 

568. 

legal rate of ., In statute, Cameron v, M. & M. Bank, 37 Mich. 

241. 

public and general . Reg. v, Bedfordshire, 4 El. & Bl. 540. 

righty title and . In deed. Parks v. Watson, 29 Mo. 108. 

In discharge of mortgage. Barnstable Sav. Bank v, Barrett, 121 
Mass. 172. 

INTEBE8TED. In statute, Moore v. Marsh, 7 Wall. 515; Dimes v. Proprietors, 3 H. 

L. Cas. 759; Peck V, Peck, 35 Conn. 390; Miller v. Montgomery. 
78 N. Y. 282. 

in the case. In statute. Browning v, Bancroft, 5 Mete 88. 

in the estate. Re White, 37 Cal. 190. 

or oonoemed in. In statute. Miller v. State, 48 Ala. 123. 

beneficially in the recovery. In statute, Giles v. Halbert i3 

N. Y. 32. 

cause or proceeding in which he is • In statute. Ellis v. 

Smith, 42 Ala. 353. 

parties . In statute. Rickett v. R. Co., L. R., 2 H. L. 175 ; Char- 
man V. McCarty, L. R., 7 H. L. 243. 

person . In statute. Dodd v. Northrup, 37 Conn. 216; Lancas- 
ter, etc., R. Co. V, Heaton, 8 El. & Bl. 965 ; Green v. Borland, 4 
Mete. 330. 

those therein. In statute. Shelton v. Town of Derby, 27 Conr. 

414. 



J 



INTERFERE. 183 INTOXICATING. 

with or prejudioially al&ot. In statute. Queen v. Metropol- 



itan Works, 3 B, & S. 719. 

with the term of oi&oe. In constitution. Board v. Mattoz, 30 



Ark. 567. 
INTEBFEBEKCE. In statute. Gold, etc.. Separating Co. v. U. S. Ore Co., 6 Blatchf. 

307. 
INTEBIOB. more distriot. In statute, U. S. v, Bearse, 4 Mason, 194. 

nTTEBLmSATION. Didier v, Warner, i Code R. 42- 

INTEBLOCUTOBY. Mora v. Sun Mut. Ins. Co., 13 Abb. Pr. 304. 

judgment. Cambridge Bank v. Lynch, 76 N. Y. 514. 

order. Talem v, Gilpin, i Del. Ch. 13. 

ix« T JSuMEDDIaE. McQueen v. Babcock, 41 Barb. 337. 

INTEBMEDIATB. tolL Hollingworth v. State, 29 Ohio St. 552. 

INTEBNAIi. alteration. In lease. Perry v.. Davis, 3 C. B. (N. S.) 776. 

improvements. In statute, U. P. R. R. v. Colfax Co.. 4 Neb. 

450; South Platte Land Co. v, Buffalo Co., 7 Neb. 260; Mayor 
V, Wharf Co., 63 Ala. 629; Township of Burlington v, Beasley, 94 
U. S. 310 ; County Comm'rs v. Chandler, 6 Otto, 205. 

improveoient and local oonoem. In constitution, Magee v. 



Mathis, 21 Ark. 41. 
DTFEBPLEADBB. Gibson z<. Goldthwaite, 7 Ala. 281. 

inTJSttPOSE. the deftase of usury. In statute, Rosa v, Butterfield, 35 N. 

Y.665. 

INTEBPBET. In order, Atkins v. Palmer, 4 B. & Aid. 377. 
nVTEBBUFT. In statute. Brown v. State, 46 Ala. 175. 

HTFEKaUFTIOK. In statute, Carr v, Foster, 3 Q. B. 581. 

without . In statute, Webb v. Bird, 10 C. B. (N. S.) 268 ; 13 C. 

B. (N. S.) 841 ; Arkwright v, Gell, 5 M. & W. 203. 

INTEBSECT. Re Springfield Road, 73 Pa. St 127. 

In statute. State v, Northampton Co., 45 Conn. 344. 

INTIMIDATION. In indictment, O'Connell v. Queen, 11 CI. & F. 155. 

INTO. and out of the port. In statute. The Maria. L. R., i Adra. & 

Ecc. 358. 

the township. In statute, Pompton v. Cooper Union, 11 Otto. 



196. 
through or under. In statute, Roderick v. Local Bd., 5 Ch. 



Div. 328. 
INTOXICATED. In statute. State v, Kelley, 47 Vt. 294. 

fbund . In information. State v, Kelley, 47 Vt 294. 

INTOXICATINa. In statute. Com. v, Herrick, 6 Cush. 468. 

liquor. People v, Zeiger, 6 Park. C. C. 355. 

In indictment. Eagan v. State, 53 Ind. 162. 

In statute, Jewett v, Washburn, 43 Ala. 574 ; State v, Biddle, 54 N. H. 
379; Millett V, Stevenson, 26 Conn. 429; Com. v. Grey, 2 Gray, 
501 ; Com. V, Livermore, 4 Gray, 18 ; Com. v. Herrick, 6 Cush. 465 ; 
People V, Hawiey, 3 Mich. 330 ; Markle v. Akron, 14 Ohio, 368 ; 
People V, Wheelock, 3 Park. C. C. 9; Clifford v. State, 29 Wis. 329; 
Com. V, Smith, T02 Mass. 144; Com. v, Crawford, 12 Cush. 273 ; 
Batchelder v. Com., 109 Mass. 362. 



INTOXICATION, 



Z84 



INVOLUNTARY. 



nrrOXICATIOlV. gross and oonflrmed habits of 

Blaney, 126 Mass. 205. 

INTBODUCBD. Gibson v. Kirk, i Q. B. 855. 

In order, Reg. v, Willuts, 7 Q. B. 518. 
Russell V, Chambers, 43 Ga. 478. 



In staiuie, Blaney «^. 



INTBUDS. 

INTKUDEB. 

INTBirSTED. 



nrvAsioir. 



INVEZGItED, 

INVENTED. 

INVENTION. 



In statute. Sargent v. Usher, 55 N. H. 287. 

or deposited. In statute, Staniels v, Ra3rmond, 4 Gush. 316. 

with and in possession ofl In statute, Fuentes v. Monies, L. 

R., 3 C. P.' 268. 

with any note. In statute. Rex v, Bakewell. i Russ. & Ry. 35. 

agent with the possession. In statute. Cole v. Bank, L. R. 

9 C. P. 470; 10 id. 355. 

insurrection or civil commotion^ or of any military or 

usurped i)Ower. In fire policy. Insurance Co. v. Boon, 5 Otto, 
117. 

In statute, U. S. v, Ancarola, i Fed. Rep. 683; 17 Blatchf. 425. 

In deed. Bowman v, Taylor, 2 Ad. & Ell. 293. 

Hicks V, Kelsey, 18 Wall. 670 ; Hailes v. Van Wormer, 20 Wall. 354 ; 
Smith z/. Nichols, 21 Wall. 112 ; Seymour z/. Osborne, xi Wall. 516; 
Thompson z'. Woodman, 10 Wall. 117; Double Pointed Tack. Co. 
V, Two Rivers Manuf. Co., 3 Fed. Rep. 26 ; McCormack v, Sey^ 
mour, 3 Blatchf. 210 ; Union Paper, etc., Bag Co. v, Pultz, etc., 
Co., 15 Blatchf. 160; Horton v, Maborn, 12 C. B. (N. S.) 450; 
Roberts V. Ryer, i Otto, 151. 

such • In statute, McClung^^. Kingsland, i How. 202. 

In statute, Lewis v. Marling, 10 B. & C. 27 ; Milligen v. Picken, i C. 
B. 800. 

In constitution, Trade-Mark Cases, 100 U. S. 92. 

In contract. Freeman v. Baker, 5 B. & Adol. 807. 

In statute, Stratt v, Robinson, 3 B. & Adol. 395. 

People V, Utica Ins. Co., 15 Johns. 358; Shoemaker v. Smith, 37 
Ind. 122. 

In statute, Scott z/. DePeyster, i Edw. 513; New York Fire Ins. Co. 
V, Ely, 2 Cow. 678 ; Duncan v, Maryland Savings Bk., 10 Gill & 
J. 299. 

In statute, Parker Mills v. Comm'rs of Taxes, 23 N. Y. 242. 

secured or in her name. In statute, Jennings v, Davis, 31 

Conn. 134. 

INVESTIGATION. Wright v. Chicago, 48 111. 285. 

INVESTMENT. In statute. Douglass v. Town of Chatham, 41 Conn. 210 ; People v, 

Utica Ins. Co., 1 5 Johns. 385. 

INVOICE. Rolker v. Great Western Ins. Ca, 4 Abb. App. Dec. 76. 

In statute, U. S. v. Twenty-eight Packages, Gilpin, 323. 

or entered value. In statute, Arthur v, Goddard, 6 Otto, 146. 

price. LeRoy v. United Ins. Co., 7 Johns. 343. 

In contract. Plank v, Gavila, 3 C. B. (N. S.) 806. 

INVOLXJNTABY, Brown v, Kendall, 6 Cush. 294. 

servitude. In coustitution, Clark's Case, i Black£ 122 (la 

Am. Dec. 213). 



INVENTOR. 

INVENTOB8. 
INVENTORY. 

INVEST. 



INVESTED. 



INVOLVE. 185 ISSUE. 



INVOIiVE. the merits. In statute, Ernst 7/. The Brooklyn, 24 Wis. 616; 

Oatmen v. Bond, 1 5 Wis. 23. 

INWABD8. and outwards. In contract. Cross v. Payham, L. R., 6 Ex. 9. 

IRON. received. In guaranty, Colbourn v. Dawson, 10 C. B. 772. 

bar or bolt . In statute, U. S. v, S^rchet, Gilpin, 275. 

or improper conduct* In statute, Harris v. Town of Wood- 



stock, 27 Conn. 567 ; Shelton v. Town of Derby, 27 Conn. 414. / 
process. Cooper v. Harter, 2 Ind. 252. 

rRBBaXJIiABITY. Salter v, Hilgen, 40 Wis. 363; ex parte Schwartz, 2 Tex. 

(App.) 74 ; Woodcock v, Ben net, i Cow. 735. 

IBBEIiEVAKOY. People v. McCumber, 18 N. Y. 315.. 

IRKESIiEVAIfT. Seward v. Miller, 6 How. Pr. 312 ; Fabbricotti v. Miller, 6 How. 

Pr. 312; Carpenters. West, 5 How. Pr. 53. 

IBKEPATlABTiK ix^jury. Wable v Reinbach, 76 111. 322 ; Johnson v, Kier, 3 

Pittsb. 204. 

In statute, Todd v, Andrews, 3 Mart. (La.) N. S. 25. 

TftRBSIBTIblJB. superhuman cause. In statute. Clay County v, Simonsen, 

I Dakota Terr. 404. 

violence. Walker v. Guarantee Asso., 18 Q. B. 278. 

IS. In pleading, Fisher v. Ford, 12 Ad. & Ell. 654. 

In statute. Lewis 'z/. Comm'rs, 12 Kas. 206. 

IBOIiATED. parts of counties. In statute, Reg. v. Brecon, 15 Q. B. 816. 

IS8ITABI«E. plea. Colquitt v, Mercer, 44 Ga. 432. 

Holland v, Adams, 3 Gray, 188; Graves v, Stokes, i Taunt. 415; 
Harkness v. Corning, 24 Ohio St. 416; Adams v. Law, 47 How. 
417 ; Maxwell v. Call, 2 Brock. 119; Henderson v, Womack, 6 Ired. 
Eq. 487 ; Powell v. Brandon, 24 Miss. 343. 

In deed. Price v, Sisson, 2 Beas. 1 68 ; Den v. Smith, Penn. 9 ; Grier 
V, Grier, L. R. 5 H. L. 688. 

In statute, Rodman v. Smith, 2 N.J. (L.) 7; Curtis v, Leavitt, 17 
Barb. 309; Bigelow v, Moring, 103 Mass. 287; Drain v, Violet, 2 
Bush, 157. 

In will. King v. Savage, 121 Mass. 303; Edwards v, Bibb, 43 Ala. 

666 ; Lyles v. Digges, 6 H. & J. 364 (14 Am. Dec. 281) ; Bradley v, 

Cartwright, L. R., 2 C. P. 511 ; Roddy v. Fitzgerald, 6 H. L. Cas. 

823; Heasman v, Pearce, L. R., 11 Eq. Cas. 522; Cooper v. Mac- 

donald. L. R., 16 Eq. Cas. 258; re Hopkins, 9 Ch. Div. 131 ; Martin 

V, Holgate, L. R.. i H. L. Cas. 175 ; Moore v. Moore, 12 B. Mon. 

655 ; Black v, Cartwell, 10 B. Mon. 193 ; Barnes v. Greenzcbach, 

I Edw. 41 ; McPherson v, Snowden, 19 Md. 197 ; Taylor v. Taylor. 

63 Pa. St. 481 ; Kleppner v. Laverty, 70 Pa. St. 70; Robins v. 

Quinlivan, 79 Pa. St. 333; Gibson v. Gibson, 4 Jones (L.), 425; 

Cushney z/. Henry, 4 Paige. 345; Kingsland z/. Rapelye, 3 Edw. i; 

Timanus v. Dugan, 46 Md. 402; Thomas v, Higgins, 47 Md. 439; 

Ralph t/. Carrick, 11 Ch. Div. 873; Jordan z/. Roach, 32 Miss. 482; 

Walker T/. Petchell, i C. B. 652; Jellicoe v. Gardiner, 18 C. B. (N. 

8.) 860; Gardiner v, Jellicose, 20 C. B. (N. S.) 198; Cannon v. 

Rucastle, 8 C. B. 885. 

Joined. Pointer v. Rust, 7 Humph. 532. 

male. In will, Lambert v. Peyton, 8 H. L. Cas. i. 

31 



ISSUE. 



i86 



JEWELS. 



ISSUE — Continued. 



IT. 



ITA. 
ITEM. 

JAILS. 
JEOPABDY. 



JETSAM. 
JETTISOir. 



JEWELRY. 
JEWELS. 



offJEUst. In statute. State v. Brown, 70 N. C. 27; Keener -z/. 

Fingar, 70 N. C. 35. 

of her body. In will. Young v. Turner, i B. & S. 554, 

of my^ body. In will. Allgood v. Blake, L. R., 7 Ex. 339. 

at . Manufacturers, etc., Ins. Co. v. Atwood, 42 U. C. Q. B. 307 ; 

Cerriby v. Wells. 7 U. C. P. R. 330. 
first . In will, . Doe v, Taylor, 10 Q. B. 724. 

for wantof 8u6h . In will, Burrin v. Charlton, i Man. & G. 

439. 
in de&ult of . In will, Foster v. Hays, 4 El. & Bl. 732 ; Vallcr 

V, Carter, 4 El. & Bl. 173. 

lawftQ • In will, Bamford v. Lord, 14 C. B. 740. 

other the . In will, Allgood v, Blake, L. R., 8 Ex. 160. 

the . In order, Humblestone v. Welhain, 5 C. B. 195. 

without . In will. Doe v, Gallini, 5 B. & Adol. 643. 

appearing to na. In order. Queen v, Jones, 12 Ad. & EH. 6S6. 



-> shall and may be lawAil. In statute. Verplanck v. Mercantile 
Ins. Co., I Edw. Ch. 84. 

shall be lawAiL In statute, Julius v. Bishop, 5 App. Cas. 214; 



Williamson v. Williamson, i Johns. Ch. 491. 

shall not be lawftil. In statute. Queen v, Nott, 4 Q. E 768. 

was proposed. In contract, Meigh v, Clinton, 1 1 Ad. & Ell. 429L 

quod. Feltham v, Cudworth, 2 Ld. Ray. 760. 

In will. Doe V, Westley, 4 B. & C. 668 ; Hopewell v, Ackland, i 



Salk . 239. 



state 



In statute, U. S. v, Schroeder, 14 Blatchf. 345. 



Kearney v. State, 48 Md. 16; State v. Gill, 33 Ark. 129 ; U. S. v. Wil- 
son, Bald. 78. 

in . In constitution. State v, Ray, Rice (L.), i (33 Am. Dec. 90) ; 

Wilson V, Com., 3 Bush, 105 ; Com. v. Farrell, 105 Mass. 189; Wright 
V, State, 5 Ind. 290 ; McCorkle v. State, 14 Ind. 39 ; Morgan v. State, 
13 Ind. 215; O'Brien v. Com., 9 Bush, 333 ; U. S. v, Riley, 5 Blatchl. 
204 ; State v, Abram, 4 Ala. 272 ; Dunn v. State, 2 Ark. 229 ; Peo- 
ple V McNealy, 17 Cal. 332 ; Mount v. Com., 2 Duv. 93 ; State %>. 
Stebbins, 29 Conn. 463; State v. Nelson, 26 Ind. 366: ex parte 
Lange, 18 Wall. 165 ; Finley v. State, 61 Ala. 201 ; Mixon v. State. 
55 Ala. 129; White?/. State, 49 Ala. 344; Grogan v. State, 44 Ala. 
9; Johnsons. State, 29 Ark. 46; Steck v. State, 29 Ark. 115; Lee 
V, State, 26 Ark. 260 (7 Am. Rep. 611); McKenzie v. State, 26 Ark. 
335; State V, Cheek, 25 Ark. 206; State v. McKee, i Bailey (Law). 
651 (21 Am. Dec. 499, note) ; People v. Cage, 48 Call. 324; People 
V, Hunckeler, 48 Cal. 331 ; People v, Webb, 38 Cal. 467 ; ex parte 
McLaughlin, 41 Cal. 211. 

In statute, Legge v, Boyd, i C. B. 93. 

In insurance policy, Lawrence v, Aberdein, 5 B. & Aid. 10; Butler v. 
Wildman, 3 B.' & Aid. 404 ; Phillips v. Barber, 5 B. & Aid. 16.. 

In statute. Com. v, Stephens, 14 Pick. 370. 

Cavendish v. Cavendish, Brown Ch. 467. 

or ornaments. In statute. Ramaley v. Leland. 43 N. Y. 539 ; 

Bernstein v, Sweeney, 33 N. Y. (S. C.) 271. 



JOB. 



187 



JUDGMENT. 



JOB. 



JOHTT. 



JOUTFLY. 



JOnfT-T 
JOINTUBS. 



JOS. 
JOniUiEX. 



JT7DGX. 



JUDGMENT 



when the ia flnished. In contract, Stickney v, Cassel, 6 III. 

418. 
regiilar or paid riders. In conditions of race^ Walmsley v. 

Matthews, 3 Man. ^ G. 133 ; 3 Scott (N. S.). 584. 

and several. Carter v. Carter, 2 Day, 442 ; Jenkins v, DeGroot, 

I Caines' Cas. 122 ; Smith v, Martin, 4 Dessau. 148. 

stock company. In statute, Att'y-Gen. v. Mercantile Marine 



Ins. Co., 121 Mass. 524. 

at the — — expense. In statute, Lapham v. Rice, 55 N. Y. 472. 

In contract. Linders v, Melrose, 3 Hurl. & N. 180. 

and severally. In bond, Mitchell v, Darricott, 3 Brev. 145 ; 

Rice 2/. Gove, 22 Pick. 158. 
In note. Healey v. Story, 3 Ex. 3 ; Bradlee v, Boston Glass Manu- 
factory, 16 Pick. 347. 

indebted. In statute, Richter v. Poppenhausen, 42 N. Y. 373. 

eiizecute the ofiloe. In statute. Queen v. Wake, 8 El. & BI. 384. 

estate in • In statute. Ketchum v, Wals^orth, 5 Wis. 100. 

Perry 2/. Penyman, 19 Mo. 469; McCartee v. Teller, 2 Paige, 511; 
Grogan v. Garrison, 27 Ohio St. 50. 

In statute, Tevis v, McCreary, 3 Mete. (Ky.) 151; Vance v, Vance, 
21 Me. 364. 

In note, U. S. v. Keen, i McLean, 429. 

In statute, Gholson v. State, 53 Ala. 521 ; Bakers/. State, 49 Ala. 350 ; 
Eslava v. Slate, 49 Ala. 355; Lockett v. State, 47 Ala. 42; Smith v. 
State, 3 Heisk. 511. 

upon a . In statute, Carr v. State, 34 Ark. 448. 

San Francisco v, Randall, 54 Cal. 408. 

Cunningham v, Bucklin, 8 Cow. 178 (18 Am. Dec. 432). 

In constitution, Betts v. New Hartford, 25 Conn. 180. 

In statute, Hamilton v. Territory, i Wyoming Terr. 136. 

of a county court. In statute. Fowler v, Merrill, 11 How. 375. 

of any court. In constitution. People v, Willson, 15 III. 388. 

In statute, Carrington v, Andrews, 12 Abb. Pr. 348. 

any of a court of record. In statute. People v, Goodwin, 50 

Barb. 562. 

In constitution, Sims' Case, 7 Cush. 288 ; State v, French, i Chand. 

130. 
of the court of appeals. In constitution. Settle v. Van Evrea, 

49 N. Y. 280. 

In statute, Curtis v. Gill, 34 Conn. 49; Frazer v. Gibson, 7 Mo. 272 ; 
Mottz/. Union Bk., 38 N. Y. 18; Ganet v, Wheeler, 4 Wis. 308*- 
ex parte Overseers, L. R., 6 C. P. 245 ; Bamberg v. Sterne, 76 N. 
Y. 555 ; County of Dallas v, Timberlake, 54 Ala. 404 ; Pierce v. 
City of Boston, 3 Mete. 560; Com. v. Gloucester, no Mass. 491; 
Cummings v. Heard, 2 Minn. 34; Pearson v. Lovejoy, 53 Barb. 
407; Union Bk. v, Martin, 3 La. Ann. 34; Cloud v. State, 2 Harr. 
(Del.) 361 ; Com. v, Lockwood, 109 Mass. 325 ; Russell v, Lathrop, 
117 Mass. 424. 

— by agreement. Reed v, Sutton, 2 Cush. 123. 

decree or final order. In statute. Prewott v. Crump, 23 Miss. 

575. 



JUDGMENT. 



i88 



JUNIOR. 



JTJDOMSBTS — Continued. 

Ibr the plaintiff. In docket. Titus v. Whitney, i Harr. (N. J.) 

85 (31 Am. Dec. 85). 

in lenL Lord v. Chadbourne, 42 Me. 429. 

or order. In statute. Queen v. Overseers, 3 Q. B. Div. 457. 

reversed and oause remanded. In order of court. Ryan v, 

Tomlinson, 39 Cal. 639. 

roll. Packard v. Bird, 40 Cal. 378. 

which may be rendered against him in hisoi&pial capacity* 

In statute. Dallas Co. v. Timberlake, 54 Ala. 403- 

amonnt of . Re Boyd, 4 Sawyer, 267. 

creditor who has obtained . In statute. Re Frankland, L. R.» 

8 Q. B. 18. 



JUDGMENTS. 



JUDIdAIi. 



JUinOB. 



In statute. Teague v. Perry, 64 N. C. 39. 

of courtB of record. In statute^ Baker v, Stonebraker, 34 Mo. 



172. 

— act. Jordan v, Hanson, 49 N. H. 199; People v. Bush, 40 CaL 
244; State z/. Doyle. 40 Wis; 175; Abbott v. Matthews, 26 Mich. 
176; Mills V, Brooklyn, 32 N. Y. 489; U. S. v. Distillery, i Hughes, 

533. 

— biifliness. In statute. State ?/. California Mining Co., 13 Nev. 



203. 



In contract, Wadsworth v. Green, i SandC 78. 

— deoiaiona. In constitution. Little v, Gould, 2 Blatchf. 165; 2 
Blatchf. 362. 

— discretion. Tripp v. Cook, 26 Wend. 143 ; Clason v, Shotwell, 
12 Johns. 30; Rooke's Case, 5 Coke, 99; Rex v, Wilkes, 4 Burr, 
2539; Judges V, People, 18 Wend. 94; Piatt v, Munroe, 34 Barb. 
292; Jenkins v. Brown, 21 Wend. 454. 

— officer. Jewison v, Dyson, 9 M. & W. 541. 

"^ officers. In constitution, Golding's Petition, 57 N. H. 146 ; 
Att'y-Gen. v. Squires, 14 Cal. 12. 

— power. In constitution, Sanders v, Cabemoss, 43 Ala. 173 ; Mer- 



rill V, Sherburne, i N. H. 199 (8 Am. Dec. 52); Kingz/. Derham Bk.» 
15 Mass. 447 (8 Am. Dec. 112); Crane v. Maginnis, 1 Gill ^ J. 463 
{19 Am. Dec. 237) ; Parks v, Boston, 8 Pick. 218 (19 Am. Dec. 322). 

— power as to matters of law and eqidty. In constitution. Cal- 
lanan v, Judd, 23 Wis. 349. 

— proceeding. Queen v. Tomlinson, L. R., i C. C. R. 49; Robert- 
son V. Barbour, 6 Monr. (Ky.) 523. 

proceedings. In constitution, Haile v. Hill, 13 Mo. 613 ; Bright 



V, White, 8 Mo. 422 ; Hendry v, Clure, 29 Ark. 414. 

In statute. Chappel v. Smith, 17 Ga. 68: \3,^,v. Myers, i Hughes, 

533. 

sale. Williamson v. Berry, 8 How. 495 ; Sturdevant v, Norris. 

30 Iowa, 65. 

In statute. Mannly v, Pemberton, 75 N. C. 219; Wright v, Vickers, 
81 Pa. St. 122 

tribonal. State v. New Haven, etc., R. Co., 43 Conn. 351. 

Brainard v. Sheplin, 6 Vt. 9 (27 Am. Dec. 533) ; Padgett v. Lawrence, 
10 Paige Ch. 170; Coit v. Starkweather, 8 Conn. 293. 



JUNK-SHOP. 



189 



JUSTICE. 



JITBSI. 



JUmSI-SHOP. In city ordinance. City Council v. Goldsmith, 12 Rich. 470. 

JUBIBDICTION. Lange z/. Benedict, 73 N. Y. 12; Railroad Co. v. Placer Co., 43 Cal. 

365 ; Grignon v. Astor, 2 How. 319; U. S. v. Arredondo, 6 Pet. 709 ; 
Frammel v, Russelville, 34 Ark. 105 ; Rhode Island v, Massachu* 
setts, 12 Pet. 657; Hickman v, O'Neil, 10 Cal. 292 ; Brownsville v. 
Bass, 43 Tex. 440 ; ex parte Bennett, 44 Cal. 84 ; Hopkins v. Com., 
3 Mete. 460. 

In statute. Queen v. O'Connor, 5 Q. B. 15 ; re Vogt, 18 Int. Rev. Rcc. 
18; re Stupp, II Blatchf. 155. 

pertaining to probate oourta. In constitution. Monastes v. 

Catlin, 6 Oregon, 119. 

oononrrent . In statute. U. S. v. Davis, 5 Mason, 357. 

State V. McLear, 11 Nev. 39; State v. Burket, 2 Mill. 15s (12 Am. Dec. 
662) ; Gillespie v. Benson, 18 Cal. 409. 

Li constitution. Crugerv. H. R. R. R., 12 N. Y. 190; Hood v. Finch, 
8 Wis. 387 ; Lumsden v. City of Milwaukee, 8 Wis. 486 ; Clark v. 
City of Utica, 18 Barb. 451 ; State v. Everett, 14 Minn. 439; Knight 
V. Campbell, 62 Barb. 16; Lamb v. Lane, 14 Ohio St. 167 ; Bibel v. 
People, 67 111. 172; Fitchburg, etc., R. Co. v. Boston, etc., R.Co., 3 
Cush. 58; Queen v. Ingham, 5 B. & S. 271 ; The Franconia, 2 Prob. 
Div. 163 ; Carpenter v. State, 4 How. (Miss.) 163 (34 Am. Dec. 116). 

of twelve men. In constitution. Whitehead v. Arkansas, etc., 

R. R. Co., 28 Ark. 463. 

trial by . In constitution. State v. McClear, 1 1 Nev. 39 ; People 

V. Kennedy, 2 Park. C. C. 312; May v. Milwaukee, etc., R. Co., 3 
Wis. 219. 

Cooper z/. Phipps, L. R., 2 H. L. 149. 

In statute. Robinson v. Burton, 5 Kas. 293. 

and equitable. In statute. Princes v. Bos, L. R., 5 H. L. 176. 

^ and reasonable. In statute. Peek v. R. Co., 10 H. L. Cas. 473 ; 

Simons T/. R. Co., 18 C. B. 805 ; London, etc., R. Co. v. Dunham, 18 
C. B. 826. 

and reasonable oampenaation for the servioee rendered. In 

contract. CuUey v. Hardenburgh, i Denio, 508. 

and reasonable terms. In statute. Empire Fire Ins. Co. v. Real 

Estate Trust Co., i Bradw. 391. 

-"^^ and true aooonnt* In statute. Sprague v. Branch, 3 Cush. 577. 

caose. In statute. Osgood v. Nelson, L. R., 5 H. L. 636. 

olaim. In statute. Ludlow z/. Ramsey, 11 Wall. 581. 

claim of the assured. In insurance policy. Insurance Co. v. 

Rodell, 5 Otto, 232. 

-*— > oompensation. In constitution. Putnam v. Douglass Co., 6 
Oregon, 328 ; Bigelow v. West Wisconsin R. Co. 27 Wis. 478 ; Ala- 
bama R. Co. V. Burkett, 42 Ala. 83 ; Bloodgood v. Mohawk, etc., R. 
Co., 18 Wend. 93 (31 Am. Dec. 313) ; Whiteman v. Wilmington, 
etc., R. Co., 2 Harr. (Del.) 514 (33 Am. Dec. 411). 

debts. In will. Collamore v. Wilder, 19 Kas. 67 ; Peck v. Bots- 

ford, 7 Conn. 172 (18 Am. Dec. 92) ; Maxwell v. Maxwell, L. R.,4 H. 
L. 506: Smith V, Porter, i Binney, 209; Burke v. Jones, 2 Vesey& 
B. 275 ; Smith v. Mayo, 9 Mass. 60. 

of the peace. In constitution. Betts v. New Hartford, 25 Conn. 

180. 



JITS. 
JXTST. 



JUSTICB. 



190 



KILL. 



KEEP. 



JUSTICE ^ Continued. 

to do . In will. Cole v. Hawes, 4 Ch. Div. 1^, 

JUSTICES. In statute. Queen v. Justices, 6 B. & S. 805. 

any two . In statute. Re Peerless, i Q. B. 143. 

JUSTlb'IABTiE. cause. In statute, U. S. v. Coffin, i Sumn. 394. 

JUSTLY. due. In statute, Rogers v, Abbott, 128 Mass. 102; Ames 2/. 

Ames, 128 Mass. 277. 

In statute. Com. v, Kunball, 105 Mass. 467; State v, Hanchett, 3S 
Conn. 38; Mitchell v, Commr's, 18 Kas. 188; Stolz v. People, 5 
111. 168. 

and bear arms. In constitution, Nunn v. State, i Kelly, 243 ; 

Stockdale v. State, 32 Ga. 225 ; State v, Jumel, 13 La. Ann. 399. 

in repair. In lease, Luxmore v, Robson, i B. & Aid. 585 ; Tilden 

V. Tilden, 13 Gray, 103, 

In statute. Blood v, Bangor, 66 Me. 1 54. 

open. In statute. Com. v, Harrison, 1 1 Gray, 308 ; Lynch v. 

People, 16 Mich. 472. 

"* open any room. In statute. State v. Cady, 47 Conn. 44. 

proper books of aooonnt. In statute. Re Winsor, 16 Bank. 



KEEFEB. 



KEEFEBS. 



keefuvg. 



KEEPS. 



KEPT. 



giini)Owder. In statute. Biggs v, Mitchell, 2 E & S. 



Reg. 152. 

have or — 

532. 
Cutler V, Howe, 122 Mass. 541 ; Stevens v. People, 67 111. 587. 

of a dog. In statute, Comm'rs v, Riley, 52 N. H. 368; Barrett 

V. Melden, etc., R. Co., 3 Allen, loi. 

thereof In statute, McCoy v, Zane, 65 Mo. 12. 

at large without a . In statute, Jennings v. Wayne, 63 Me. 468,. 

of a ferry. In statute. Covington Ferry Co. v, Moore, 8 Dana^ 



159. 



of hotels. In statute. Re Jones, 3 Ch. Div. 458. 



E3SBOSENE. 



U. S. V, Smith, 4 Cranch C. C. 635. 

a shop. In statute. Smith v, Hursell, 10 B. & C. 543. 

a tdxo bank or gaming table. In statute, U. S. v. Smith, 4 

Cranch C. C. 635. 

open a dram shop. In statute, Blahut v. State, 34 Ark. 447. 

safbly and securely all moneys deposited. - In cashier* s bond^ 

Huntsville Bank v. Hill, i Stew. 201 (18 Am. Dec. 39). 

open store. In statute. Snider v. State, 59 Ala. 67. 

he her. In slander. Downing v, Wilson, 36 Ala. 717. 

in operation. Jepherson v. Hunt, 2 Allen, 417. 

watchman on the premises. In insurance policy, Crocker v^ 

People's Mut. Ins. Co., 8 Cush. 79. 

In insurance policy. Hall v. Ins. Co., 58 N. Y. 292. 

inveigle or . In statute, Hadden v. People, 25 N. Y. 373. 

People V, Ebner, 23 Cal. 158; State v, Rollins, 8 N. H. 550; Moody 
V. People, 20 N. H. 315; Redfield v. State, 24 Tex. 133; State v. 
Whaley, 2 Harring. 538; Com. v. Blodgett, 12 Mete. 56. 

In deed. French v, Carhart, i N. Y. 96. 

r any dog. In statute. Cummings v, Perham, i Mete. 556. 



KILL. 191 KNOWN. 

I , 

KELL — Continued. 

any seal. In statute. The Ocean Spray, 4 Sawyer, 109. 

or take. In statute, Loome v, Baily, 3 El. & El. 448. 

to all dogs. In city ordinance. Neiswanger z/. City of Kansas, 

71 Mo. 44. 

with intent to . In statute. Sarah v. State, 28 Miss. 267. 

KIN. near of . In statute. Hibbard v. Odell, 16 Wis. 635. 

neurit of . In statute. McCool z/. Smith, j Black, 459; Pinkham 

V. Blair, S7 N. H. 226 ; Dickens v. N. Y. C. R. R., 23 N. Y. 1 58 ; Drake 
V. Gilmore, 52 N. Y. 389; Lathrop v. Smith, 24 N. Y. 417. 

jiXMU. another . In statute. Francis v. Mass, 3 Q. B. Div. 342. 

any of property. In statute. Tait v. Local Board, 2 El. & Bl. 

492. 
SZENDBED. In statute. Hughes v. Decker, 38 Me. 1 53 ; Farrz/. Flood, 11 Cush. 24. 

of the half-blood. In statute. Larrabee z/. Tucker, 116 Mass. 

563. 

KTNDS. of property. In statute. Guardians v. Board of Health, i B. & 

S. 176. 

KVOGKED. down. Sherwood v. Reade, 7 Hill, 439. 

KVOWnfQ. In statute. Sullivan Co. v. Grafton Co., 55 N. H. 339 ; Merrimack v. 

Sullivan, 45 N. H. 181. 

himself not to be a qualified eleotor. In statute. Com. v. 

Bradford, 9 Mete. 268. 

jLXif O W in QLY. Com. v. Hulbert, 12 Mete. 448; Com. z/. Boynton, 12 Cush. 499; 

Cliquot's Champagne, 3 Wall. 114; Gregory v. U. S., 17 Blatchf. 
327. 

In statute. Casks of Sherry, 2 Ben. 250; U. S. v. Barney, 3 Am. L. J. 
128 ; Byrne v. State, 12 Wis. 519; U. S. 7/. Highleyman, 22 Int. Rev. 
Rec. 138. 

and fraudulently vote at any election. In statute. State 7\ 

Hart, 6 Jones, 389. 

and wiUfidly. In statute. U. S. v. Mekim, 3 Pittsb. 155 ; Fel- 

ton V, U. S., 6 Otto, 699. 

permits. In statute. State v. Stafionl, 67 Me. 125. 

sella In statute. Verona, etc.. Cheese Factory v. Murtaugh, 4 



Lans. 17. 

— vote. In statute. McGuire v. State, 7 Humph. 54. 



wittingly, willingly and . In statute. Mierelles v. Banning, 2 

B. h Ad. 909. 

L In statute. People 7/. Carroll, 11 Heisk. 417; Crowell z/. Brown,* 9 
Gray, 274. 

gnilty •! . In statute. Casks of Sherry, 2 Ben. 250 

to his or belief. In statute. Reeves v. Lambert, 4 B. & C. 217. 

to my . In insurance policy. Ins. Co. v. Gridley, 10 Otto, 616. 

In statute. Reg. v. Briggs, Dears, h B. 98 ; Story v. Buffum, 8 
Allen, 38. 

by. Com. v. Griffin, 105 Mass. 175. 

creditors. In statute. Davis' Appeal, 39 Conn. 395. 

intemperate habits. In statute. Smith t/. State, 55 Ala. 3. 

to. Com. V. Griffin, 105 Mass. 175. 



KNO WN. 



Z92 



LAND, 



KNOWN — Continued. 

if . In steUfUe. Story v. Buflfum, 8 Allen, 35. 

not or UMd before the applioatlon. In statute. Rennock v. 

Dialogue, 2 Peters, i. 

personally . In certificate. Wyllis v. Haun, 47 Iowa, 614. 

In statute, Kelly v. Calhoun, 5 Otto, 713. 

Coflfeen v, Bninton* 4 McLean, 516. 

In statute. Balch v. R. Co^ 46- N. Y. 521 ; Stewart v. Davis, 31 Ark. 
520; Strilcerz/. Cassidy, 76 N. Y. 50; 17 N. Y. (S. C.) 18; Hoyt v. 
White, 46 N. H. 45 ; Weymouth v. Sanborn, 43 N. H. 171 ; Rob- 
inson V. Aiken, 39 N. H. 211. 

— and work. In statute. Fennell v. Ridler. 5 B. & C. 409. 

biudneas or work. In statute. Pattee v, Greely, 13 Mete. 286. 

I>erformed« In statute. Young v. The Orphans, 1 19 Mass. 179; 

Parham v. McMurray, 32 Ark. 268. 

upon any land. In statute. Bailey v. Hull, 11 Wis. 289. 

claim for . In statute. Weymouth v. Sanl>orn, 43 N. H. 173. 

I>er8onal — . In statute. Crofton v. Poole, i R & Ad. 568. 

In statute. Balch v. N. Y.. etc., R. R., 46 N. Y. 521 ; Kent v. N. Y. 
Cent. R. R., 12 N. Y. 628; McClusky v. Cromwell, 11 N. 
Y. 593; Warner v. Hudson River R. Co., 5 How. Pr. 454; Sulli- 
van's Appeal, 82 Pa. St. 107; Wentroth's Appeal, 82 Pa. St. 469; 
Wilson 7/. Zulneta, 14 Q. B. 405; Busie v. Griffiths, 34 Cal. 302; 
Taylor v. Hathaway, 29 Ark. 600; Dano v. R. Co., 27 Ark. 567; 
Price V. Kirk, 90 Pa. St. 48 ; Bramnell v. Pennock, 7 B. & C. S4» '. 
Lehigh Coal, etc., Co. v. Central R. Co. ,1 N. J. L. J. 103 ; Queen 
V. Cleworth, 4 B. & S. 927. 

or operative. In statute. Ericsson v. Brown, 38 Barb. 390. 

In statute. Missouri, etc., R. Co. v. Baker, 14 Kas. 563. 

and servants. In statute. Aiken v. Wasson, 24 N. Y. 4S2 ; 

Dean v. De Wolf, 16 Hun, 186. 

and workmen. In statute. Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Leuffer, 84 



Pa. St. 168; Tietjen v. Penniman, i La. 267. 

will carry emigrant not over fbrty. In contract. Richards v. 

Hay ward, 2 Man. & G. 574. 

buyer. Price v. Monat, 1 1 C. B. (N. S.) 509. 



IiADEN. 
LADY-DAY. 
laAQEB. 
TiATD. 



IAMB. 
XiAin>. 



Searight v. Stokes, 3 How. 151. 

In lease. Doe v. Benson, 4 B. & Aid. 588. 

beer. Watson v. State, 55 Ala. 160. 

out. In statute. Fuller v. Mayor of Springfield, 123 Mass. 289. 

out and opened. In statute. State v. Huck, 29 Wis. 207. 

up. In insurance policy. Hunter v. Wight, 10 B. & C. 715. 

In indictment. Rex v. Puckering, 1 Moody, 242. 

Nostrand v. Durland, 21 Barb. 478. 

In contract. Streeter v. Streeter, 43 111. 155. 

Indeed. Baker v. Johnson, 2 Hill, 342; Canfield v. Ford, 28 Barb. 
336; Green v. Armstrong, i Denio, 550; Mott v. Palmer, i N. Y. 
564 ; Van Gorden v. Jackson, 5 Johns. 440. 

In statute. Leavitt v. Cambridge, 120 Mass. 157; Johnson v. Rich- 



LAND. 



193 



LANDS. 



LAUD — Continued. 

ardson, 33 Miss. 464.; Angell v, Paddington Vestry, 3 Q. B. 714; 
Queen v. Water-works, 18 Q. R 703 ; Chelsea Water-works z^. Bow- 
ley, 17 Q. B. 360; Queen v. R. Co., 4 El. k Bl. 958; Croskey v. 
North-western Manufg Co., 48 111. 481 ; People v. Board of Asses- 
sors, 39 N. Y. 81 ; Alexander v. Miller, 7 Heisk. 65 ; Peto v. Over- 
seers, 2 El. & El. 158; Leavenworth, etc., R. Co. z/. U. S., 2 Otto. 
734. 
In will, Herri ngton v. Budd, 5 Denio, 32T. 

and mannon houae. In will. Mitchell v. Walker. 17 B. Mon. 73. 

and real aatate. In statute. State v. Tichenor, 41 N. J. (L.) 345. 

belonging to a highway. In statute. Burrows v. Gallup, 32 

Conn. 493. 

buUt upon or used fbr building purposes. Bt statute. Car- 



I.AKIIED. 



XiAKDING. 



XtAiroiaADY. 
I.ANDLOBD. 



rington v. R. Co., L. R., 3 Ch. App. 377. 

— covered with water. In statute. Reg. v. Birmingham Water- 
works, I B. & S. 92 ; Newport Dock Co. v. Local Board, 2 B. & S. 
708 ; East London Water-works v. Sewer Co., L. R., 6 Q. B. 669. 

— in a town. In statute. Carrington v. R. Co., L. R., 3 Ch. App. 



377. 



on whioh it stands. In conveyance. Gear v. Barnuro, 37 Conn. 



229. 



— purchased from the United States. In statute. Torrence v. 
Carbry, 27 Miss. 697. 

— route usually traveled. In statute. Greene v. McGhee, 37 
Ala. 164. 

used as a railway. In statute. South-western R. Co. v. Board 



of Health, 4 El. & Bl. 191 ; North-eastern R. Co. v. Local Board, L. 
R., 5Q. B. 157. 

In statute. Kingston Dock Co. v. La Marche, 8 B. & C. 53 ; Harvey 
V. Mayor, L. R., 4 Ex. 260. 

estate. In statute. Police Jury of St. Mary v. Harris, 10 La. 

Ann. 676. 

In will. Bradstreet v. Clarke, 12 Wend. 601. 

Hay V, Briggs, 74 Pa. St. 373. 

place or basin. In conveyance. Quintard v. Bishop, 29 Conn. 

366. 

Griffin v. Gilbert, 7 C. B. loi ; Gardner v. Green, 3 Dowl. P. C. 343. 

Williams v. Brunton, 8 111. 621. 

In statute. Hosford v. Ballard, 39 N. Y. 147 ; Cringer v. McLaury, 41 
N. Y. 219; Doley v. lies, 11 Ad. & Ell. 338. 

In statute. People v. Cassity, 46 N. Y. 46 ; Doe v. Tucker, 3 B. & 
Adol. 476 ; Railroad Co. 2/. Tremont Co., 9 Wall. 89; Comm'rs of 
Chase Co. v. Shipman, 14 Kas. 532 ; Grand Junction Canal Co. v. 
Overseers, L. R.. 6 Q. B. 175 ; Higgins v, Harding, L. R.. 8 Q. B. 7: 
Queen v. R Co., L. R., 10 Q. B. 389 ; Alloway v. Wagstaff, 4 Hurl. 
&N. 308; 4 Hurl. & N. 689; Eaton v, Whitaker. 18 Conn. 225; 
Allason v. Stark, 9 Ad. & Ell. 225 ; King v, Manchester Water- 
works, I B. & C. 632 ; Kingsley v. Holbrook, 45 N. H. 313. 

In will. Prescott v. Barker, L R., 9 Ch. App. 174; Pond v. Bergh, 
10 Paige, 140 ; Hunter v. Hunter, 17 Barb. 25. 



«5 



LANDS. 194 LA UNCHED. 



I1AKD8 — Continued . 

and tenements. In deed. Pond v, Beiigh, 10 Paige, 140. 

of the United States. In statute. U. S. t/. Reese, 5 Dill. 40$. 

or grounds whereon said bridge is to be buill Ik stahOe. 

Hauthorn v. R. Co., 3 Q. B. 734. 

overflown by the swelling and onirents of the river. In 



grant, Sutter Case, 2 Wall. 562. 
-tenements and estate of the said company. In bond. Ring 



V. Marshal], 10 Jur. (N. S.) 921. 

tenements and hereditaments. In statute. Evans v. Roberts, 

5 B. & C. 829; Mayor v. Mabie, 13 N. Y. 151 ; Doe v, Botterill. 5 R 

A Adol. 137. 

all — — . In statute. Atwater v. Inhabitants of Woodbridge, 6 Conn. 
223 (16 Am. Dec. 46). 

Com. V. Lowell Gas-light Co., 12 Allen, ff. 

In will. Van Pretres v. Cole, 73 Mo. 39. 

LABCENY. State v. Hawkins. 8 Port. 461 (33 Am. Dec 294); Reg. v. Hollaway. 2 

C. & K. 945 ; People v. Belden, 37 Cal. 51 ; Mitchum v. State, 45 
Ala. 29 ; Mason v. State, 32 Ark. 237 ; Johnson v. State, 36 Tex. 
375 ; Robertson v. Lea, i Stew. 141 ; People v. Maxwell, 24 Cal. 14; 
People V. Juarez, 28 Cal. 380 r Ransom v. State, 22 Conn. 153; 
Hickey v. State, 23 Ind. 21 ; State v. Wood, 46 Iowa, 116; Hart v. 
State, 57 Ind. 102 ; Fields v. State, 6 Coldw. 524 ; Smith v. People. 
53 N. Y. Ill; Com. v. Adams, 7 Gray, 43 ; People v. Nichols. 3 
Park. C. C. 759; Weston v. U. S., 5 Cranch C. C. 493 ; Mullins v. 
State, 37 Tex. 337; State v. South, 28 N. J. (L.) 28; State v. New- 
man, 9 Nev. 48 ; State v. Hawkins, 8 Port. 461 ; Marcus v. State, 
26 Ind. loi ; Macino v. People, 19 N. Y. (S. C.) 127; Loomis v. 
People, 67 N. Y. 322; Crocheron's Case, i City Hall Rec. 177: 
Palmer v. People, 10 Wend. 165 ; Com. v. Tobin, 2 Brewst. 570. 

In statute. State v. Ramelsburg, 30 Mo. 26; State v. Smith, 16 Mo. 

550. 
by a bailee. In statute. State v. Stone, 68 Mo. loi. 

simple . In statute. Pitcher v. People, 16 Mich. 143. 

laASCIVTOirS. behavior. In statute. State v. Millard, 18 Vt. 574. 

carriage and behavior. In statute. Fowler v. State, 5 Day, 83. 

LAST. and ninial place of abode. In statute. Tilden v. Johnson, 6 

Cush. 358. 

assessment roll. In statute. Phelps v. Town of Lewiston, 15 

Blatchf. 133. 

examination. In statute. Spence v. Jones, 5 B. & Aid. 708. 

mentioned* In plea. Braucker z/. Molyneux, i Man. & G. 710. 

past. Brown v. Hankerson, 3 Cow. 70. 

sickness. In statute. Prince z/. Hazleton, 20 Johns. 502 (11 

Am. Dec. 307) ; Sykes v. Sykes, 2 Stew. (Ala.) 364 (20 Am. Dec. 40}. 

LATE. a resident of. In petition. Beckett v. Seloyer, 7 Cal. 215, 

the W. C. In indictment. Pleasant v. State, 17 Ala. 190. 

LATiSNT. ambiguity. Webster v. Paul. 10 Ohio St. 534. 

LA TER A Ti . motion. Brooks v. Jenkins, 3 McLean, 432. 

LATTEB. part of the month. In contract. Bailey v. Ricketts. 4 Ind, 488. 

LAUNCHED. In statute. Homer v. Lady of the Ocean, 70 Me. 350. 



I.A W. 195 LA WFUL. 

In constitution. Railroad Co. v. McClure, 10 Wall. 511; People c*. 
Wallace. 70 III. 680 ; People v. Wright. 70 III. 388 ; Reynolds v. 
Blue, 47 Ala. 711 ; Mobile Comm'rs v, Putnam, 44 Ala. 506; Pacific 
R. Co. V, Maguire, 20 Wall. 36; State v, Weston, 4 Neb. 216. 

charges. Morse v, Williamson, 3 Mart. (La.) 282. 

day. Kortright v, Cady, 21 N. Y. 343. 

of nature. Wightman v. Wightman. 4 Johns. Ch. 343. 

of the land. In constitution. Randall v, Brigham, 7 Wall. 523 ; 

Greene z/. Briggs. i Curtis C. C. 311 ; Davidson v. New Orleans, 
95 U. S. 97 ; Barker v, Jackson, i Paine, 470 ; Bank of Columbia v. 
Okeley, 4 Wheat. 235; State v. Knight, 43 Me. 11; Saco v. Went- 
worth, 37 Me. 165 ; State v, Doherty, 60 Me. 504 ; Vanzant v. Wad- 
dell, 2 Yerg. 210; Wallyt/. Kennedy, 2 Yerg. 554; State Bank v. 
Cooper. 2 Yerg. 605 (24 Am. Dec. 537) ; Bud v. State, 3 Humph. 
492 ; Pope V. Phifer, 3 Heisk. 701 ; Jones v. ferry, 10 Yerg. 7^ ; 
Mayor of Alexandria v, Dearmon, 2 Sneed. 121 ; Mayor of Nash- 
ville V, Althorp, 5jCold. 560; Reynolds v. Baker, 6 Cold. 228; 
Brown v, Haywood, 4 Heisk. 363 ; State v, Burnett, 6 Heisk. 186; 
Trustees v. Foy, i Murphy, 58 (3 Am. Dec. 672) ; James t/. Reynolds, 
2 Tex. 251 ; Byrne T/. Stewart, 3 Dessau. 478; Hoke v, Henderson, 4 
Dev. 15; Dorman v. State, 34 Ala. 216; Mayo v, Wilson, i N. H. 
53 ; Brown v. Hummel, 6 Pa. St. 87 ; Webb v, Reinhard, 73 Pa. St 
370; Ervine's Appeal, 16 Pa. St. 256; Taylor ?/. Porter, 4 Hill. 146; 
Sears z/. Cottrell, 5 Mich. 251 ; Parsons v, Russell, 11 Mich. 129. 

as the direote. In will, Fielden v, Ashworth, L. R., 20 Eq. 

Cas. 411. 

establiflhed by . In constitution. People v, Edmonds, 15 Barb. 

529. 

entitled by . In statute. Queen v, Darlington Board, 6 B. & 

S. 569. 

Qod'8 . In statute. Brook v. Brook, 9 H. L. Cas. 193. 

not aathoriied by . In statute. Com. v. Dana, 2 Mete. 334. 

required by . In bond. Van Epps v. Walsh, i Woods, 599. 

age. McKim v. Handy, 4 Md. Ch. 228. 

authoritiee. In treaty. U. S. v. Clarke, 8 Pet. 436 ; Mitchel v, 

U. S., 9 Pet. 7" I. 

oauae. In statute. Jenkins v. Cook, i Prob. Div. 81. 

ohargee. In statute. Posey v. Persley, 60 Ala. 243. 

(daim. In statute. Broder v. Water Co., 1 1 Otto, 276. 

debt. In statute. Holdsworth v. Mayor, 1 1 Ad. & Ell. 490. 

deed. In covenant. Dearth v. Williamson, 2 S. & R. 498. 

goods. In insurance policy. Seton v. Low, i Johns. Cas. i ; 

Skidmore v. Desdoity, 2 Johns. Cas. 77 ; Juhel v. Rhinelander, 2 
Johns. Cas. 120. 

heirs. In will Smith v. Butcher, 27 W. R. 281 ; Loring v. 



Thomdike, 5 Allen, 257. 

— issue. In deed. Hancock v. Butler, 21 Tex. 804. 



In will, Moore z/. Moore, 12 B Mon. 655; Black v, Cartwell, 10 B. 
Mon. 193; Palmer v, Horn, 20 Hun, 70; Kingsland v. Rapelye, 3 
Edw. I. 

merchandise. In charter-party, Boyd v, Moses, 7 Wall. 316. 



LA WFUL. 



196 



LEAKAGB. 



LAWFUL — Continued. 

money. In indictment. Garner v. State, 5 Yerg. x6o. 

•truotnre. The Clinton Bridge, 10 Wall. 454. 

title. In contract. Clark v. Redman, i Blackf. 379. 

wanaat iasaed by a court of competent juriadietion. In 

statute. Aldrich v. Aldrich, 8 Mete. 102. 

it shall be . In statute. Ex parte Simonton, 9 Port. 390 (33 Am. 

Dec, 320) ; Davison v. Davison, 17 N. J. (L.) 169 ; Verplanck z/. 
Mercantile Ins. Co., i Edw. 84; Lancaster Canal Co. v. Parmaby, 
1 1 Ad. & £11. 223 ; Queen v. Bishop, 4 Q. B. Div. 245 ; Queen 1/. 
Bishop, 4Q. B. Div. 525 ; King v. Broderic, 5 B. & C. 240; Queen t'. 
R. Co., I £1. & Bl. 228 ; Rex v. Bailiffs, i B. & C. 85 ; Queen v. R. 
Co., 16 Q. a 20 ; Wilson v. Eden. 18 Q. B. 488. — 

it shall and may be . In statute. Re Newport Bridge, 2 El. & 

El. 380. 

it i^iall not be . In statute. Canal Co. v. Railroad Co.. i C. £. 



LAWFULLY. 



LAWS. 



LAWSUITS. 



LAYING. 



LEAD. 



LEADING. 
LEAKAGE. 



Green, 321 ; 3 C. E. Green, 546. 

Ih statute. Wsuie v, McMillen, 29 Mo. 18 ; Merchan v. Walsh, 6 Mo. 
346 ; McCartney v. Alderson, 45 Mo. 35 ; Fawcett v, R. Co., 16 Q. 
B. 612; Ex Parte McKee, 18 Mo. 599. 

begotten. Shaw v. Gould, L. R., 3 H. L. 55. 

demanded. In statute. Earl of Shrewsbury v. Wilson, 2 M. & 

S. 525. 

diaobarged. In band. Mason v. Haile, 12 Wheat 370; Ammi- 

don V. Smith, i Wheat. 447. 

divided. In will. Miller v. Miller, i Duv. 9. 

summoned. In statute. Levy Court v. Coroner, 2 Wall. 501. 



In statute. Persse v. Brooks Paper Works, i Robt 145. 

of the several States. In statute. Swift ?/. Tyson, 16 Peters, 

18; McNeil V. Holbrook, 10 Peters, 84. 

then in Ibroe. In statute. Gilker v. Brown, 47 Mo. 105. 



In contract. Packard v. Hill, 7 Cow. 434. 

Coffin V. Jenkins, 3 Story, 108. 

out. In statute. Wolcot v. Pond, 19 Conn. 598; Cone v. City o? 

Hartford, 28 Conn. 363 ; Bowman v. City of Boston, 5 Cush. 8 : 
Hitchcock V. Board of Aldermen, 121 Mass. 382; re Public Works. 
24 Hun, 378. 

out the road. Small v. Eason, 11 Ired. (L.) 94. 

out. In statute. Charleston, etc., R. Co. v. Middlesex, 7 Mete. 

84 ; Bowman v. Boston, 5 Cush. i ; Fernald v. Boston, 12 Cush. 
574; Fuller!/. Mayor, 123 Mass. 289. 

Brunton v. Hall, i Q. B. 792. 

soft English . In contract. Pollen v. Le Roy, 30 N. Y. 549. 

information as shall to the apprehension and oonviotion of 

the thief^ In offer of reward. Tamer v. Walker, 6 R & S. 873 : 
L. R., 2 Q. B. 301. 

question. People v. Mather, 4 Wend. 229. 



In insurance policy. Cory v. Boylston Ins. Co., 107 Mass. 140. 

or breakage. In bill of lading. Philips v. Clark, 2 C. B. (N. S. » 

[56, Steele v. Townsend, 3*7 Ala. 217; The Pereire, 8 Ben. 301 ; The 
David and Caroline, 5 Blatchf. 266, Six Hundred and Thirty Casks, 



LEAKAGE. 197 ^^^ ^^ 

LEAKAGE^ Continued. 

14 Blatch. 517; The Delhi, 4 Ben. 345; Reno v, Hogan, 12 B. Mon. 
63; The Invincible, i Lowell, 255; Dedekam v, Vose, 3 Blatchf. 
44 ; Hunnewell v. Taber, 2 Sprague, i ; The Oriflamme, i Sawy. 176 ; 
The Olbers^3 Ben. 148; Vaughanz/. Six Hundred and Thirty Casks* 
7 Ben. 506; Carey v. Atkins, 6 Ben. 562 ; Nelson v. National Steam 
Co., 7 Ben. 340; Thrift v. Youle, L. R., 2 C. P. Div. 432 ; Missouri, 
etc., R. Co. V, Caldwell, 8 Kas. 244; Ohrloff v, Briscall, L. R., i P. 
C. 231; The Helene, B. & L. 429; Brauer ,z/. The Almoner, 18 
La. Ann. 266; Thomas 2/. The Morning Glory, 13 La. Ann. 269; 
Arend v, Liverpool, etc.. Steam Co., 6 Lans. 459; 64 Barb. 118. 

or stowage. In bill of lading, Hunnewell v, Taber, 2 Sprague, i. 

LEABJTED. Shepard v, Pratt, 16 Kas. 211. 

LEABinNQ. Oodly . In statute. Baker v, Lee, 8 H. L. Cas. 495. 

Sawyer v. Harison, 24 Me. 542 ; Voorhees v, Presbyterian Church, 5 
How. Pr. s^ : Doolittle v, Eddy, 7 Barb. 74 ; Jackson v, Harsen, 7 
Cow. 323; Den v, Johnson, 15 N. J. (L.) 116; Moore v. Miller, 8 
Pa. St. 272 ; Jamaica Pond Aqueduct v. Chandler, 9 Allen, 1 59. 

In contract, Peters v, Boston, etc., R. Co., 114 Mass. 127; Griswold 
V, Cook, 46 Conn. 198 ; Cummings v, Hackett, 98 Mass. 54. 

In deed. Demarest v, Willard, 8 Cow. 206 ; Hamilton v, Wright, 28 
Mo. 199 : Malue v, Ashmead, ao Pa. St. 482. 

and fknn let. In lease, Taylor v, Bradley, 39 N. Y. 129. 

and rent. In deed. Black v, Gilmore, 9 Leigh, 253 (33 Am. Dec. 

253). 
demise and let. In lease, O'Connor v, Dailey, 109 Mass. 235. 

-^ — for years. United States v, Gratiot, 14 Pet. 526 ; i McLean, 454. 



Zurk V, Grant, 25 Ohio St. 352. 

lot. In statute, McMahon v, Vickery, 4 Mo. (App.) 229. 

temu In lease. Earl of St. Germans v, Willan, 2 B. & C. 220. 

interest. In statute, Sheffield Wagon Co. v, Stratton, 27 W. R. 

120. 

In leau, Hamilton v, Wright, 28 Mo. 199. 

at . Polk V, Lane, 4 Ycrg. 35. 

In statute, Norton v. Town Clerk, 4 C. B. 37. 

at sixteen days belbre. In statute. Queen v. Abedare Co., 14 

Q. B. 854. 

ftmrteen days at • In statute. Queen v. Justices, 8 Ad. & Ell. 

173; Mitchell V, Foster, 12 Ad. & Ell. 472. 

one whole year at • In statute, Reg. v, St. Mary, i El. & Bl. 

827. 

In contrcu:t. Van Dyke v, Jackson, i E. D. Smith, 419. 

In plea, Weedon v, Woodridge, 13 Q. B. 462. 

In will, Kingt/. Savage, 121 Mass. 303. 

or remove firom the State. In statute. Florance v. Camp, 5 

La. 280. ^ 

the company. In contract. Price v, Minot, 107 Mass. 60. 

dhildren, my brother may • In will, Du Bois v, Ray, 35 N. 

Y. 162. 

If she should* no dhild. Inwill, Wright v. Baury, 7 Cush. 108. 



LEA VI NG. 



Z98 



LEGAL. 



IiEAVINQ. 



USGAOY. 



— a meeting-house. French v. Old South Soc., 106 Mass. 488 ; 
Crocker v. Same, 106 Mass. 497. 

— issue. In will. Re Smith, 7 Ch. Div. 667. 

— no issue living. In will. WalHngton v, Taylor, Sax. 141 ; 



Vreeland v, Blauvelt, 8 C. E. Green, 483 ; Trehame v. Layton, L. 
R., 10 Q. B. 459 ; re Brown, L. R., 16 Eq. Gas. 239. 

the meeting-house. In deed, French v. Old South Soc., 106 



Mass. 480 ; Crocker v. Old South Soc., 106 Mass. 489. 

without any ohild. In wiU. White v. Hill, L. R., 4 Eq. Cas. 

265 ; Bryden v, Willett, L. R., 7 Eq. Cas. 473. 

disposed of or sold within the State. In statute. Jackson v, 

Bullock, 12 Conn. 38. 

notioe thereof • In statute, Wilson v, Nightengale, 8 Q. R 

1035- 
In will. White v. Lake, L. R., 6 Eq. Cas. 188. 

to be paid with interest in three months. In will Dawes 

V, Swan, 4 Mass. 208. 

Orton V. Orion, 3 Abb. App. Dec. 41 1 ; Griswold v. Heard, 2 Gray» 

325. 
tn statute. Page v. Rives, i Hughes, 305. 

In will. Holmes v, Mitchell, 2 Murphy, 228 (5 Am. Dec. 527) ; Wil- 
liams V, McComb, 3 Ired. (Eq.) 450. 

demonstrative . Gilmer v, Gilmer, 42 Ala. 9. 

general . Gilmer v, Gilmer, 42 Ala. 9 ; Chase v, Lockerman, 1 1 

Gill & J. 277 (35 Am. Dec. 277). 

speoiflo .Gilmer v, Gilmer, 42 Ala. 9; Chase v, Lockerman, 11 

Gill & J 277 (35 Am Dec. 277). 

oause. In constitution. Gill v. Stare, 61 Ala. 170. 

oharge of her i>er8on. In statute. State v, Ruhl, 8 Iowa, 477. 

cruelty. In statute, Odom v, Odom, 36 Ga. 286. 

debt. Rogers v, Daniell, 8 Allen. 343. 

estate. Avery v, Durfrees, 9 Ohio, 147. 

expenses. In statute. Cooper v. Slade, 8 El. h Bl. 1160. 

heirs. In insurance policy, Gauch v, St. Louis Ins. Co., 88 III. 

251 (30 Am. Rep. 554). 

In will. Rand z/. Sanger, 115 Mass. 124; Perry v, Cline, 12 Cush. 
123 ; Clarke v. Cordis, 4 Allen, 466. 

— interest. In plea, Tounslee v, Durkee, 12 Wis. 481. 

irregularity. In statute. Hays' Case, 14 Abb. P r. 53. 

measures. In statute. Reg. v. Southampton, i R & S. 25. 

representative. In statute: Wamsley v. Cook, 3 Neb. 350 ; 

. O'Neale v, Caldwell, 3 Cranch C. C. 313. 

representatives. Saltmarsh v, Candea, 51 N. H. 71 ; Cox v. 



Curwen, 118 Mass. 198; Johnson v, Ames, 11 Pick. 173. 

In deed. Miller v, Evans, 3$ Mo. 45 ; Briggs v. Upton, L. R., 7 Ch. 
App. 376. 

In patent, Hogan v. Page, 2 Wall. 605 ; Galloway v. Filley, 12 Pet. 
264. 

In statute, Gurney v, Burlington Tp., 4 Dill. 372 ; Delannay v, Bur- 
net, 9 111. 454; Moorehouset'. Phelps, 18 111. 472 ; People v, Phelps, 
'j^ III. 147 ; Warneckc v, Lembea, 71 111. 91. 



LliGAL. 



199 



LEVY^ 



IiBQAXi — Continued. 

In will. Johnson v, Johnson» 12 Rich. 359. 

BUlxliyifliOBU In stahtU, l^obinson v. Forrest, 29 Cal. 317. 

tender motes. Cuviac v. Abido, 25 Cal. 302 ; Carpenter v, 

Atherton, 25 Cal. 564. 

In statute* Barker v. Chesterfield, 102 Mass. 129. 
Cora. V, Chase, 127 Mass. 7. 

bound to mcdntain her. In statute. King v. Hinton, i B. 

&Ad. 227. 
plaoed. King v. Inhabitants, i R & Ad. 217. 



USITBB. 



IiEVEL. 



laEVIED. 



LEVT. 



Den V, Crawford, 8 N. J. (L.) 90 ; Tucker v. Tucker, 5 Ired. (Eq.) 84 ; 
Chandler's Appeal, 34 Wi«. 505. 

In will. Hunter v. Cheshire, L. R., 8 Ch. App. 751 ; Lallerstedt v. 
Jennings, 23 Ga. 571. 

residiiary . In will. Laing v. Barbour, 119 Mass. 523. 

In will. Russell v. Russell, 36 N. Y. 581. 
In statute. Coleman v. State, 32 Ala. 581. 

In will. Hinson v. Pickett, i Hill (S. C), 37 ; Booth v. Terrell, 16 Ga. 

20. , 

hiB aooeptanoe. Reynolds v. Doyle, 1 Man. & G. 753. 

In statute. Burchfield v. Northern Central R. R., 57 Barb. 589. 

Devol V. Halsted, 16 Ind. 287. 

Eppes V. Mississippi, etc., R. Co., 35 Ala. 33. 

In ckarter-farty. The Volunteer, i Sumn. 551. 

In contract. Messent v. Reynolds, 3 C. B. 200. 

In order. Grant v. Dabney, 19 Kas. 390. 

In lease. Jackson v. Benson, 1 McCleland, 64 ; Foster v. Peyster, 9 
Cush. 246 ; Hemphill v. Eckfeldt, 5 Whart. 278. 

and lease. In lease. Lovering v. Lovering, 13 N. H. 513. 

In statute. Chouteau v. Str. Anthony, 1 1 Mo. 227 ; United States v. 
Broraley, 12 How. 88 ; Dewees' Case, Chase's Dec. 531 ; United 
States V. CottSngham, 2 Blatchf. 470. 

of credit. Union Bank v. Coster, i Sandf. 563 ; 3 N. Y. 203 ; 

Mechanics' Bank v. New York, etc., R. Co., 4 Duer, 480, 13 N. Y. 
599 ; Birckhead v. Brown, 5 Hill, 642. 

or oiroiilar. In statute. United States v. Noelke, 17 Blatchf. 558. 

or power of attorney. In statute. Walker v. Remmett, 2 C. B. 

850. 

In deed. C]a3rton v. Gregson, 5 Ad. & Ell. 303. 

Williamd v. Wilcox. 8 Ad. & Ell. 335. 

on. In insurance policy. Smith v. Ins. Co., 89 Pa. St. 289. 

taxes during the term. In lease. Valle v. Fargo, i Mo. (App.) 

347. 

then the same thereout. Drewe v. Lamson, 1 1 Ad. & Ell. 529. 

Crocker v. Musgrove, 9 Q. B. 223; Lloyd v. Wycoff, 11 N. J. (L.) 218 ; 
Princeton Bk. v. Crozer, 22 N. J. (L.) 383 ; Camp v. Chamberlin, 
5 Denio, 198. 

In statute. Moore v. Foote, 32 Miss. 469. 

and ooUeot. In statute. Mclnery v. Reed, 23 Iowa, 410. 



LEVY. 



200 



LIBERTY. 



LEVY— Continued. 



UBVYINQ. 



I.EWD. 
IaEWDIiY. 



LEWDNESS. 



TJABn.TTY. 



TilHKIi. 



LTBERATi. 



UBEBTY. 



— of an ezeoutloiL In insurance policy, Colt v. Phoenix Ins. Co^ 
54 N. Y. 595. . 

— sale and fbrfbitare. In treaty. The Kansas Indians, 5 WalL 



737. 
Reg. V. Whipp, 4 Q. B. 145 ; Blood v. Light, 58 Cal. 649. 

war. In constitution. U. S. v, Greathouse, 2 Abb. (U. S.) 364 ; 4 

Sawy. 457 ; ex parte Bollman, 4 Cranch, 75 ; U. S. v, Mitchell, 2 
Dall. 548; U. S. V. Vigol, 2 Dall. 346; 2 Burr's Trial, 401 ; U. S. v. 
Hoxie, I Paine, 269 ; U. S. v. Hanway, 2 Wall. Jr. 199. 

Snow V, Witcher, 9 Ired. (L.) 346. 

and laaoivloaBly associate and oohabit together. In staiuu. 

State V, Marvin, 12 Iowa, 409; Com. v, Calef, 10 Mass. 153; State 
V, Moore, i Swan. (Tenn.) 136. 

In statute. Com. v, Lambert, 12 Allen, 177. 

Queen v, Capel, 12 Ad. & Ell. 414. 

In statute, Stanton v. Wilkeson, 8 Ben. 357. 

oontraoted belbre. In statute. Re Hook, 2 Dill. 93. 

all the oatstanding of the said newspaper. In contrcut^ 

Perret v. King, 30 La. Ann. 1368 (31 Am. Rep. 240). 

contingent oontraoted by the bankrupt. In statute, Zimmer 

V, Schleehauf, 115 Mass. 52. 

debts or oontraoted belbre. In stcUute, Re Hook, 2 Dill. 92. 

U. S. V. Ulrici, 3 Dill. 532. 

to pay money upon a oontingenoy. In statute. Maples v^ 

Pepper, 18 C. B. 178. 

In statute. State v, Davis, 12 R. I. 492. 

to forMture. In statute. The Mary Celeste, 2 Lowell, 354. 

with him fbr the same debt. In statute, Fisse v, Einstein, c 

Mo. (App.) 78. 

to be in the seoond instanoe. In promissory note, Bartlett zf^ 

Saunders, 35 Ga. 142. 

Com. V, Clapp, 4 Mass. 163 ; Johnsdn v, Stebbins, 5 Ind. 364 ; Armen- 
trout V, Moraida, 8 Blackf. 426 ; Whitney v, Janesville Gazette. 5 
Biss. 330 ; Gathercole v, Nicoll, 1 5 M. & W. 318 ; O'Brien v, Clement, 
15 M. & W. 435 ; Clark v, Binney, 2 Pick. 113 , Dexter v. Spear, 4. 
Mason, 115; White v, Nichols, 3 How. 266 ; Root v. King, 7 Cow. 
613; Ryckman v. Delevan, 2$ Wend. 186; State v, Farley, 4 
McCord, 317; Cochran v, Butterfield, 18 R. I. 115. 

In instruction. Spring Co. v, Edgar, 9 Otto, 64$. 

reward. In offer of reward, Shuey v, U. S., 2 Otto^ 10. 

* et legales homines. State v, Glasgow, Cam. & N. 38. 

Com. V, Alger, 7 Cush. 70; Trustees v, Foy, i Murphy, 58 (3 Am. 
Dec. 672). 

Com. V, Alger, 7 Cush. 70 ; Trustees v. Foy, i Murphy, 58 (3 Am. 

Dec. 672). 
of the press. In constitution. Com. v, Blanding, 3 Pick. 304 

(15 Am. Dec. 214); Sweeney v. Baker, 13 W. Va. 158 (31 Am. Rep. 

757). 

to make. Curtiss v Hoyt, 19 Conn. 155. 

at to. In order. Miller v, Shuttleworth. 7 C. R 105. 



JLICENSE. 201 LIGHT. 

Bridges v. Pursell, i Dev. & B. 496; Ulery v, Jones, 81 111. 403; 
Thomas T/. Surrell, Vaughn, 350; Rathbone t/. McConnel]» 20 Barb. 
31 1 ; Taylor v, Wate' ^ 7 Taunt. 374 ; Cook v. Steams, 1 1 Mass. 523 ; 
Mumford v, Whitney, 15 Wend. 380; Thompson v, McElanaey, 
82 Pa« St. 174; Anderson v, Simpson, 21 Iowa, 399; Greeley v. 
Stetson, 37 Mich. 153 ; Knowles v. Peck, 42 Conn. 387; Sun Asso- 
ciation i. Tribune Association, 44 N. Y. (S. C.) 136 ; Wolfe t/. Frost, 
4 Sandf. Ch. 72 ; Jamieson v. Millemann. 3 Duer, 255 ; Mumford, 
V, Whitney, 15 Wend. 380 (30 Am. Dec. 60); Doolittle v, Eddy, 7 
Barb. 78. 

In contract, Oliver v, Morgan, 10 Heisk. 322. 

In statute. Gibbons v, Ogden, 9 Wheat, i ; Sinnot v, Davenport, 22^ 
How. 227; U. S. V, Cutting, 3 Wall. 441 ; People v. Acton, 48 Barb. 
524; Ash V, People, 11 Mich. 347 ; State v, Watson, 5 Blackf. 155; 
People V, Mayor of New York, 7 How. Pr. 81 ; Curtis v. Smith, 42 
Iowa, 66j|| 

and empower. In deed, Washbume v, Gould, 3 Story, 157. 

and regulate. In constitution, San Jose v, R. Co., 53 Cal. 476. 

appointment or authority. In statute. Com. v, Kennedy, loS 

Mass. 293 ; Com. v. Carpenter, 100 Mass. 206 ; Com. v. Wilson, 1 1 
Cush. 413; Com. V. Lafontaine, 3 Gray, 481 ; Com. v, McSherry, 3. 
Gray, 481, note ; Com. v, Conant, 6 Gray, 484 ; Com. v, Clapp, 5 
Gray, 99,- Com. v, Clark, 14 Gray, 374. 

regulate and restrain theatrical amnaementa. In statute^ 



Hodges V, Mayor, 2 Humph. 61. 

— tax. In city ordinance. Home Ins. Co. v. City Council, 3 Otto,. 



16 ; Home Ins. Co. v. City Council, 50 Ga. 530. 

In statute. City of Leavenworth v. Booth, 15 Kas. 627. 

any or authority. In statute. State v. Grant, 74 Mo. 36. 

I»ilot. In statute. Brown v, Elwell, 60 N. Y. 249. 

—r- premiaes. In statute. Lester v, Tonens, 2 Q. B. Div. 403. 

Ex parte Foster, 2 Story, 133; Jordan v. Bank, 74 N. Y. 467; Green 
V. Johnson, 2 Hawks. 309 ; McFarland v, Wheeler, 26 Wend. 467 ; 
Trust V. Pirsson, i Hilt 292 ; Walter v. Smith, 2 B. & Aid. 439. 

"* In contract, Griswold v. Cook, 46 Conn. 198.. 

In letter. Stone v. Browning, 49 Barb. 244. 

In statute. Storm v. Waddell, 2 Sandf. Ch. 494; Downer v, Brackett^ 
21 Vt 509; Wright V. Vickers, 81 Pa. St. 122 ; Jones v. Groover, 46 
Ga. 568; ex parte Foster, 2 Story, 131 ; Porter v. Brooks, 35 Cal. 
199; Davenport t'. Tilton, 10 Mete. 320; Holmes v. Tutton, 5 El. & 
Bl. 78 ; re Trim, 2 Hughes, 356. 

or pledge. Gloucester Bk. v. Worcester, 10 Pick. 528. 

under final prooeaa. In statute, Howe v, Ins. Co., 42 Cal. 53 k 

upon a judgment. Brundson v, Allard, 2 EL & £1. 27. 

give any thereon. In statute, McMurray v. St Louis Oil 

Manuf. Co., 33 Mo. 377. 

in . In statute. State v. Fanner, 21 Mo. 160. 

beyond the of the ofitoder. In statute. Wallack v. Van Ris- 

wkk, 2 Otto, 202. 

during the thereof. In deed. Benham v. Minor, 38 Conn. 252. 

Inflammable fluid used as a . In insurance policy. Williams v. 

Piremans' Fund Ins. Co., 54 N. Y. 569. 
26 



LIGHTER. 



ao2 



LIQUIDATED. 



In statute. Reed v. Ingham, 3 El. & Bl. 890 ; Blanford v. Morrison, 
15Q. B. 730. 

LIQHTSBAGS. Western Transportation Co. v. Hawley, i Daly, 327. ^ 

IJGHTEB8. In statute. The Mamie, 5 Fed. Rep. 820. 

IJGHTNING. /// insurance policy, Spensley v. Lancashire Ins. Co., 11 N. W. Rep. 

894. 
flre by • In insurance policy, Babcock v. Mont. Ins. Co., 4 N. Y. 

326. 
deBoription and quality. In statute. Great Western R. Co. v, 

Sutton, L. R., 4 H. L. 226. 

dromnBtanoeB. In statute, Strick v, Swansea Coal Co.. 16 



C. B. (N. S.) 255. 

— nature In statute. Re Empire Ass. Co., L. R., 4 Eq. Cas. 341 ; 
Parker v, R. Co., 6 El. & Bl. 102. 

— ofltonae. In statute. Com. v, Fo^ain, 127 Mass. 452. 
prooeedings. In statute. Queen v. Justices of Surrey, L. R., 



5 Q. a 87. 

remedies. In statute. Houghton v. Field, 2 Cush. 141. 

sum. In statute, Toledo, etc., R Co. v. People, 81 111. 141 . 

authority of the nature. In statute, Le Veux v. Berkley, s 

Q. B. 838. 

in manner. In conviction. Ex parte Aldridge, 2 R & C. 600. 

instrument of kind or deeoription. In statute. Sears v. State. 

33 Ala. 347. 
liable to a penalty. In statute, Thomas v, Stephenson. 2 El. k, 

Bl. 106. 

to the eflbot. In statute, Reg. v, Hanxrick, i El. k. Bl. 618 ; Reg. 

V, Cemetery Co., 6 EI. & Bl. 419. 

In will. State Bank v, Ewing, 17 Ind. 68 ; Farrish v. Cook, 6 Mo. 

(App.) 3^. 
In statute, Walton Commrs. v. Walford, L. R, 10 Q. B. i8a 

and appoint. In deed. Shove v, Pincke, 5 Term. Rep. 124. 

jurifldiotion. Den v, Hammel, 18 N. J. (L.) 73. 

of oredit. In contract, American Button Hole Co. v, Gumee. 

44 Wis. 49. 

general of buildings. In statute, Bd. of Wks. v. Hall, L. R.. 

4 C. P. 85 ; Simpson v. Smith. L. R., 6 C. P. 87 ; St. George v. Spar- 
row. 16 C. a (N. S.) 214. 

regular of buildings. In statute. Tear v. Freebody. 4 C. B. 

(N. S.) 228. 

resident upon the of the oanal. In statute. Card v, Caleb, 

69 111. 314. 

my and clothes of all kinds. In will. Hunt v, Hort 3 Brown 

Ch. 312. 

Calcutta tale, quale. In contract. Wieler v. Schilizzi, 17 C. B. 

619. 
LIQUIDATE. Fleckner v. Bank of United States, 8 Wheat. 378. 

XJQUIDATED. Hargroves^z/. Cook, 15 Ga. 321. 

damages. Pierce v. Fuller, 8 Mass. 223 (5 Am. Dec 102). 

In contract. L^ngz/. Towle, 42 Mo. 545 ; Hahnt/. Horstman, 12 Bush, 

249. 



UKEWIBE. 
T.TMTT. 

UMITED. 
UNE. 



laNEN. 
LINSEED. 



LIQUIDATED, 



203 



LIVING. 



U9JJIDATED — Continued. 

In mortgage, Foote v, Sprague, 13 Kas. 155. 

demandL In statute. Hodsoll v, Baxter, i El. B. & El. 885. 

LIQUIDATING. aooounts. In statute. Cooper v, Coates, 21 Wall. 105. 

LIQUOB. In statute. State v. Martin, 34 Ark. 340. 

ftonented or distilled . In statute, Harris v, Jens, 9 C. R 



(N. S.) 1 52. 
spirituouB — - 



In statute, Clifford v. State, 29 Wis. 329. 



UQUOBS. 



UST. 



LITEaABY. 



In statute. People v, Crilley, 20 Barb. 246; State v. Townley, 18 N. 
J. (L.) 311 ; Kizer z^. Randleman, 5 Jones (N. C), 428. 

malt • In statute. State v, Stais, 67 Me. 242. 

sale of spirituoiiA . In deed, Fielden v. Slater, L. R., 7 Eq. Cas. 

523- 
strong or spirituous . In statute, Commrs. of Tompkins Co. 

V, Taylor, 21 N. Y. 173. 

of TOters. In statute, Noseworthy v. Overseers, L. R., 9 C. P. 

233. 
In statute, Reg. v, Jones, 8 Q. B. 725 ; Queen v, Pocock, 8 Q. B. 729. 

property. Woolscy v, Judd, 4 Duer, 379 ; Keene v, Wheatley, 

4 Am. L. Reg. 44. 

purposes. In statute, Kendrick v, Farquhar, 8 Ohio. 189; 



IJTiaATED. 

Lmaious. 



Common Council v, Indianapolis, 8 Ind. 328. 

LITERATUBIr. In statute. Baker v, Lee, 8 H. L. Cas. 49$ ; Reg. v. Jones, 8 Q. B. 

725 ; Queen v, Pocock, 8 Q. B. 729. 

soienoe and the fine arts. In statute, Reg. v, Manchester, 16 

Q. a 450. 
Eastman v, Symonds, 108 Mass. 568. 

right. In statute, Cucullu v. Hernandez, 13 Otto, 116. 

SUte V, Call, 48 N. H. 132. 

and dead stook. In will Porter v. Tourney, 3 Vesey, 311. 

horses, mules and stook. In statute. The Matilda A. Lewis, 5 

Blatchf. 520. 

together as husband and wifb. In statute, Ross v, Ross, 103 

Mass. S7S: Hanson v. Hanson, 11 1 Mass. 158. 
LxvjsIjIHOOD. In will, Darley v, Darley, 3 Atk. Ch. 399. 

the fttrm on which he . In will, Kendall v. Miller, 47 How. 

Pr. 446. 

joint . In decree in equity, Highley v, Allen, 3 Mo. (App.) 521. 



LIVED. 



IJVINa-, 



In deed, Randle v. Long, 6 Ad. & Ell. 22$. 

In statute, Hanson v, Hanson, 111 Mass. 158. 

in adultery. In statute. People v. Gates, 46 Cal. 53 ; Richard- 
son V, State, 37 Tex. 364 ; State v, Crowner, 56 Mo. 147 ; Halkv. 
State, 53 Ala. 463 ; Stete v. Way, 5 Neb. 283 ; Parks v. State. 4 Tex. 
(App.) 134; Stete V, Gastrell, 14 Ind. 346; McLelland v. State. 25 
Ga. 477 ; Collins V. State. 14 Ala. 608; Smith v. State, 39 Ala. 554; 
Hall V. Stete, 53 Ala. 463 ; Quartemus v. State, 48 Ala. 271. 

apart. In statute. Re Emma, 17 C. B. 176. 

apart from his wife. In statute,* Ex parte Gilmore, 3 C. B. 967. 

at my deoease. In will. Hall v, Hancock, is Pick. 255 (26 



Am. Dec. 598). 



LIVING. 



204 



LOCAL 



uvrwa 



LOAD. 



LOADXD. 



Continued. 

at the time of his deoease. In will Diamond v. Bostwick,23 

W. R. 554; Picot V, Armistead, 2 Ired. (Eq.) 226. 

Btill . In statute. Hanson v. Hanson, iii Mass. 15S. 

Thwing V. Great Western Ins. Co., 103 Mass. 406. 

of two tons. Huntley v- Woodward, 9 Gray, 86. 

or unload at his own riak. In bill of lading. Indianapolis, 

etc., R. Co. V. Allen, 31 Ind. 394; Penn v, Buffalo, etc., R. Co., 49 
N. Y. 204 ; Stinson v. New York, etc., R. Co., 32 N. Y. 333. 

In contr€u:L Aschroft v. Colliery Co., L. R.. 9 Q. B. 540. 

In statute. Rex v. Mountford, i Moody, 441 ; Rex v. 



LQADEBra. 



LOAN. 



LOAinSD. 

LOBBY. 
LOCAL. 



Harris, 5 C. & P. 159. 

— or discharged. In statute. Kingston Dock Co. v. La Marcbe. 
8 B. & C. 53. 

— pistol. In verdict. Rex v. Kitchen, i Russ. & Ry. 95; Rex v. 
Carr, i Russ. tt Ry. 378. 

— in turn. In charter^arty. Robertson v. Jackson, 2 C. B. 413: 



Schultz V. Liedeman, 14 C. B. 38; Hudson v. Clementson, 18 C. E 
213. 

— off shore. In insurance peUcy. Johnson V. North-western, etc. 
Ins. Co., 39 Wis. 87. 

unloading, •oonTesranoe or other wise, whether arising from 



negUgenoe or otherwise. In bill of lading. Hawkins t^. Great 
Western R. Co., 17 Mich. 57 ; Sisson v. Cleveland, etc., R. Co.. 14 
Mich. 489. 

from the . In insurance policy. Jones v. Ins. Co., L. R., 7 Q. B. 

702. 

to be suspended while • In insurance policy. Reed v. Ins. Co., 

5 Otto, 23. 

Tyson v. Recham, 3 H. & J. 109; Kent v. Mining Co., 78 N. Y. 158. 

In statute. Conklin v. Nat. Bk. of Oswego, 45 N. Y. 655 ; Bank v. 
Lanier, 11 Wall. 369. 

of money. In statute. Kendig v. Linn, 47 Iowa, 62. 

or discount on pledge of its own stock. Vansands v. Middle- 
sex County Bk., 26 Conn. 157. 

its credit. In constitution, Jarrott v. City of Moberly. $ ^i^^* 



256. 
In will. Wright's Appeal, 89 Pa. St 67. 
giTen or to. In constitution. Darby v. Wright, 3 Blatchf. I73- 



— services. Trist v. Child, 21 Wall. 441. 

— action. Mason v. Warner, 31 Mo. 508 ; Henwood v. Cheesroan, 
3S. & R. 500. 

bill. In constitution. People v. Hills, 35 N. Y. 449 » Huber v. 



People, 49 N. Y. 132; People v. Supervisors, 43 N. Y. 10; Peoples. 
O'Brien, 38 N. Y. 193 ; ^Williams v. People, 24 N. Y. 405 ; Connor «f. 
Mayor, 5 N. Y. 285; Healey v. Dudley. 5 Lans. 115: Fall Brook 
Coal Co. V. Lynch, 47 How. Pr. 52a; People v. Stephens, 2 Abb. 
Pr. (N. S.) 348 ; People v. McCourdle, 35 N. Y. 449 ; P>«rce v. 
Kimball, 9 Greenl. 54 (23 Am. Dec. 537). 

— disease. In insurance policy. Scholes v. Ins. Co., 42 Cal. 525. 

— law. In constitution. Earle v. Board of Education, 55 Cal. 489 ^ 



LOCAL. 



205 



LOSSES. 



LOCAL — Continued. 

State V. Walton, 69 Mo. 556; Montgomery v. Com., 91 Pa. St. 125; 
River Rendering Co. v. Behr, 7 Mo. (App.) 346 ; State v. Shields, 4 
Mo. (App.) 260 ; Lastro v. State, 3 Tex. (App.) 363. 

— office. In statute. State v. Supervisors, 21 Wis. 44$. 

option law. Boyd v, Bryant, 35 Ark. 73. 

purposes. In constitution. People v. Comm'rs of Highways, 54 

N. Y. 276 , People v. Allen, 42 N . Y. 378 ; People v. Densmore, i 
Thomp. A C. 280. 

IXX3ATB. In statute. South Boston R. Co. v. Middlesex R. Co., 121 Mass. 48$ ; 

Moule V. Macedon, etc., R. Co., 6 How. Pr. 37. 

In contract. Waldron v, Marcier, 82 111. 550 ; Railroad Co. v. Jones, 2 
Coldw. 574. 

anew. In statute. Hyde Park v. Comm'rs, 1 17 Mass. 416. 

LOCATED. Middlesex R. Co. v. Wakefield, 103 Mass. 263. 

now . Chambers v. Clews, 21 Wall. 317. • 

Rector v. U. S., 2 Otto, 698. 

Hollingsworth v. Barbour, 4 Pet. 466. 

North Noonday Mining Co. v. Orient Mining Co., i Fed. Rep. 522 ; 
Bullion Mining Co. v. Croesus Co., 2 Nev. 168 ; Foote v. National 
Mining Co., 2 Mont. 402 ; Philpots v. Blaesdel, 8 Nev. 61 ; Eureka 
Co. V. Richmond Co., 4 Sawy. 302. 

quarts . Bullion Mining Co. v. Crcesus Co., 2 Nev. 168; Foote 

V. National Mining Co., 2 Mont. 402 ; Philpots v. Blaesdel, 8 Nev. 
61 ; Eureka Co. v. Richmond Co., 4 Sawy. 302. 

King V. Inhabitants, i B. & C. 580. 

In statute. Phillips v. Hewson, 3 C. P. Div. 26 ; Lalorde v. McGIow, 
3 Can. Leg. News, 94 ; Rex v. Bew, i Russ. & Ry. 480. 

LOGK-BOIiUNQ. Marshall v. Baltimore, etc., R. Co.. 16 How. 314. 



LOCATIGir. 

LOCATOB. 

LOBS. 



LODGSEL 



Loas. 

LONG. 



In statute. Haynes v. Hayward, 40 Me. 145. 

prioe. Moore v. Desarts, i N. Y. 359. 

weight. In contract. Giles v. Jones, 1 1 Ex. 393. 

as she lives. In will. Modlin v. Kennedy, 53 Ind. 267. 



LOOMS. 

LOSR 

LOSING. 

LOOSB. 
LOSS. 



In deed. Cort v. Sagar, 3 Hurl. & N. 372. 

Lawrence v. State, 1 Humph. 228 (34 Am. Dec. 644). 

party. In statute. Bangor, etc., R. Co. v. Chamberlain, 60 Me. 

285. 

turn any oattle. In statute. Sherbom v. Wells, 3 B. & S. 784. 

Fay V. Parker, 53 N. H. 342. 

In bill of lading. Baltimore, etc., R. Co. v. McWhinney, 36 Ind. 436; 
Covington v. Willan, Gow. 115; Porter v. Southern Ex. Co., 4 S. C. 

135. 
In statute. The Franconia, 2 Prob. Div. 163. 

arisixig from illicit trade. In insurauce policy. Suydam v. 

Marine Ins. Co., i Johns. 181 (3 Am. Dec. 307). 

by theft. In insurance policy. Leiber v. Ins. Co.. 6 Bush, 641. 

In statute. Whitehouse v. R. Co., L. R., 5 Ex. 13. 

all other and misfbrtunea. In insurance policy. Butler v, 

Wildman, 3 B..& Aid. 404; Phillips?/. Barber, s B. & Aid. 161. 



LOST. 



206 



LUGGAGE. 



LOOT. 



LOT. 



LOTS. 



LOW. 

LUCID. 
LUCRATIVE. 

LUGGAGE. 



In statute, Ez parte Cording, 4 B. & Adol. 207. 

— boundary. Perry v, Pratt, 31 Conn. 442. 

deed. Thompson v, Thompson, 9 Ind. 323. 

note. McGregory v. McGregory, 107 Mass. 543. 

or damaged. In notice. Garnett v. Willan, 5 B. & Aid. 57. 

or defeated by abandonment. In statute. Curtiss v, Smith» 

35 Conn. 156. 

or not lost. In insurance policy. Insurance Co. v, Lyman, i^ 

Wall. 664; Insurance Co. v, Folsom, 18 Wall. 237; Arkansas Insur* 
ance Co. v. Bostwick, 25 Ark. 539. 

In statute. Hooper v. Robinson, 8 Otto, 529. 

time. In contract. Barlow v. Lambert, 28 Ala. 704. 

Edwards v. Dtckerson, 28 N. J. (L.) 39; Trotter v. St. Louis Public 
Schools, 9 Mo. 70; Kissell v. Same, 18 How. 19 ; Glasgow v. Horitz. 
I Black, 595. 

of ground. In statute. Gardner v. Eberhart, 82 111. 316. 

of land. In statute, Fitzgerald v. Thomas, 61 Mo. 499. 

or curtilage. In statute. Coddington v. Dry Dock Co^ 2 

Vroom, 477. 

In deed. Ludlow v. Pack, 4 Ohio, 5. 

In statute, Collins v. New Albany, 59 Ind. 396. 

In statute. U. S. v. Olney, i Deady, 461 ; Dunn v. People, 40 IlL 465 ; 
State V. Clarke, 33 N. H. 329 ; Com. v. Thacher, 97 Mass. 583 ; Hall: 
V. Ruggles, 56 N . Y. 424 ; State v. Shorts, 3 Vroom, 398 ; Worden 
?/. Shotwell, 3 Zab. 465 ; Bell v. State, 5 Sneed, 507 ; Com. v. Chubb, 
5 Rand. (Va.) 715; Eubanks v. State, 3 Heisk. 488; Randle v. 
State, 42 Tex. 580 ; State v. Bryant, 74 N. C. 207 ; People v. Art 
Union, 7 N. Y. 240; Morris v. Blackman, 2 Hurl. & Colt. 912; 
Com. V. Manderfield, 8 Phila. 457; Charles v. Veople, i N. Y. 180; 
Eslava v. State, 44 Ala. 406; Thomas v. People, 59 IlL 160: Cha- 
vannah v. State, 49 Ala. 396; Wilkinson v. Gill, 74 N. Y.63 (30 Am. 
Rep. 264); Skiff V. Johnson, 57 N. H. 475 ; Buckalew v. State, 62 
Ala. 334 ; Fleming v. Bills, 3 Oregon, 286 ; State v. Pinchback, 2 
Mill, 128; U. S. V, Hornibrook, 2 Dill. 229; People v. Payne, 3 
Denio, 88; Schneider?/. Charles, 4 S. & R. 151 (8 Am. Dec. 682); 
Negley v. Devlin, 12 Abb. Pr. (N. S.) 160; Allport v. Nutt, i C. Bw 
980; Morris v, Blackman, 2 H. & C. 914; State v. Mumford, 73 Mo. 
647 ; Com. V, Manderfield, i Pa. Leg. Gaz. 37. 

tioket. In statute. Kitchen v, Greenbaum, 61 Mo. no. 

In indictment. Com. v. Thacher, 97 Mass. 583. 

materials for a . In statute. Com. v. Dana, 2 Mete. 334. 

promote a . In statute. Miller v. Com.. 13 Bush, 731. 

water mark. Slover v. Jack, 60 Pa. St. 339 ; Gerrish v. Pro- 



prietors, 26 Me. 384. 

— interval. Frazer v. Frazer, 2 Del. Ch. 26q 



ofQ.oes. In constitution. State v. Kirk, 44 Ind. 401 ; Dailey v. 

State, 8 Blackf. 329. 

Cahill V. London, etc., R. Co., 10 C. B. (N. S.) 154. 

ordinary . In statute. Phillips v. R. Co., 19 C. B. (N. S.) 324. 

personal . In statute. Hudston v. Midland R. Co., 10 R & S. 514. 



LUNACY. 



207 



MAILED. 



LXnXACT. 



LTINQ. 



Owing's Case, i Bland Ch. 370 (17 Am. Dec. 311) ; Beverley's Case, 4 
Coke, 124^; re Vanauken, 10 N. J. (Eq.) 186; re Barker, 2 Johns. 
Ch. 232. 

about. In statute, Morriss v, JeflFries, L. R, i Q. B. 263 ; Law- 
rence V, King, L. R., 3 Q. B. 345. 

at anchor. Welsh v, N. Y. Floating Dock, 77 N. Y 453 ; Read 



M 
MACHINS. 



]£A< 



h:ii 



MADB. 



V, Ins. Co., 19 Hun, 284. 

at the wharfl Dewees v. Adger, 2 McCord, 105. 

dayB» In charter^rty. Commercial Steam Co. 7/. Boulton, 

L. R., 10 Q. R 346. 

on. In died. Roe v. Doe, 4 Houst 328. 

up. In insurance policy. Dows v, Howard Ins. Co., 5 Robt. 473. 

one per oentum. In note, U. S. v, Hardyman, 13 Peters, 176. 

In statute. Burrz^. Duryee, i Wall. 531 ; Corning z/. Burden, 15 How. 
267 ; New England Car Co. v, R. Co., 1 1 Md. 81 ; Piper v. Brown, 
4 Fish. Pat. Cas. 175 ; Union Sugar Refinery v, Mathiesson, 2 Fish. 
Pat. Cas.6oo;^Blanchard v, Sprague, 3 Summer, 280. 

shop. In insurance policy, Goddard v. Monitor, etc., Ins. Co., 

108 Mass. 56. 

17. In contract, Lowber v, Le Roy, 2 Sandf. 202 ; Dudley v, Jamaica 
Pond Aqueduct, 100 Mass. 183. 

In insurance policy, Seavey v. Central Ins. Co., 1 11 Mass. 540. 

In statute. Graves v. Pierce, 53 Mo. 423 ; Com. v. Lowell Gas-light Co.. 
12 Allen, 75. 

In plea, Robinson v, Grundy, 50 Vt. 122. 

an aasault. In pleading, Polkinghom v, Wright, 8 Q. B. 197. 

and leTied. In statute, Wray v. Earl, 4 B. & Adol. 125. 

a note. In plea, Peets v, Bratt, 6 Barb. 662 ; Sawyer v, Warner, 

15 Barb. 282 ; Chappell v, Bissell, 10 How. Pr. 274 ; Snyder v. State 
Bk., I 111. 122. 

or payable in this State. In statute, Orcutt v. Hough, 54 N . 



H. 472. 

to* appear. In statute, Stanley v, Fielden, 5 B. & Aid. 437. 

uaeltd. In warranty, Davis v. Ball, 6 Cush. 505. 

TOid. In statute, Kemp v, Kennedy, Pet. C. C. 4a 

money actually . In statute, Fiedeldey v, Diserens, 26 Ohio St. 

312. 

time the aaaeaament is . In statute, Mygatt v, Washburn, 1 5 N. 

Y. 316. 

MAGISTRATE. Stockwell v, Silloway, 100 Mass. 287 ; Carter v, Clohecy, 100 Mass. 

299. 

In statute, Martin v. State, 32 Ark. 124 ; Gordon v, Hobart, 2 Sumn. 
461 ; Scanlan v, Wright, 13 Pick. 523. 

MAUk In statute, Wynen v, Schappert, 3 Daly, 558 ; U. S. v, Marselis, 2 

Blatchf. 108. 

carrier. In statute, U. S. v. Parsons, 2 Blatchf. 104. 

matter. In statute, U. S. v, Bromley, 12 How. 88. 



MATT>ABT.E 

ITATT.lgTI 



Pier V, Heinrischofen, 67 Mo. 163 ; Bank v, DeGroot, 43 N. Y. (S. C.) 
341. 



MAIM, 



208 



MAKE. 



Foster t'. People, 50 N. Y. 598; Reg. v, Bullock, 11 Cox C. C. 125; 
State V, Harris, 1 1 Iowa, 414. 

In statute. Rex v. Owens, i Moody, 205 ; Turman v. State, 4 Tex. 
(App.) 586. 

Baker v, Hoag, 7 N. Y. 555; 3 Barb. 203, 7 Barb. 113. 



JCAQi* -^— 

MAHTFAIN. In statute, Moorehead v. Little Miami R. Co., 17 Ohie, 340; Com. v. 

Kimball, 105 Mass. 467 ; Whitlock v. West. 26 Conn. 406; State v. 
Hanchett, 38 Conn. 38; Usher t^. Hiatt, 21 Kas. S4- 

action. In statute. Philpott v. Jones, 2 Ad. & EIL 44- 

and proYide. In statute. State v. Larger, 45 Mo. 510. 

and work. In statute. R Co. v. R. Co., 1 1 Ch. Div. 873. 

ahall . In statute. Bacon v. Com., 7 Gratt. 602. 

JUAHTFAixufiU. In statute. Smith v. Lyon, 44 Conn. 175. 

fbnoee shall be . In statute. Rhodes v. Mummery, 48 Ind. 216. 

JUAHTFAINnra. in statute. City of New Haven v. Whitney, 36 Conn. 373. 

a t«<«i«i'jw> and pnblio worship. In will. Att'y-Gen. v. Union 

Soc., 116 Mass. 167. 

the navigation of the oanaL In deed. Llewellyn v. Swansea 

Canal, 1 Hurl. & N. 346 ; 2 Hurl & N. 509. 

MAXHTENAHOB. Arden v, Patterson, 5 Johns. Ch. 44; Wheeler v. Pounds, 24 Ala. 

472; Quigley v. Thompson, 53 Ind. 317 ; Lathrop v, Amherst Bk., 
9 Mete. 489 ; Thallheimer v. Brinckerhoff, 3 Cow. 623 (15 Am. Dec 
308); Sedgwick v. Stanton, 14 N. Y. 289 ; Findon v. Parker, 1 1 M. & 
W. 675 ; Flight V. Leeman, 4 Q. B. 883 ; New York Institute v. 
How, 10 N. Y. 84 ; Bayard v. McLane, 3 Harr. (Del.) 208 ; McCall v. 
Capehart, 20 Ala. 521 ; Wickham v. Conklin, 8 Johns. 220 ; Dorwin 
V, Smith, 35 Vt. 69 ; Andrews v. Thayer, 30 Wis. 228 ; Blackcrly t^. 
Holton, 5 Dana, 520; Perine v. Dunn, 3 Johns. Ch. 508; Com. 
V. Dupuy, 'Bright, 44 ; Walcot v. Knight, 6 Mass. 418; Everenden 
V. Beaumont, 7 Mass. 76; Sweet v. Poor, 11 Mass. 549; Brinley t». 
Whiting, 5 Pick. 359; Thompson v. Marshall, 36 Ala. 504; Go wen 
V. Norvell, i Me. 265; McMicken v. Perin, 18 How. 507; Meeks v. 
Denberr)', 57 Ga. 263; Richardson v. Rowland, 40 Conn. 565; 
Parker v. Parker, 126 Mass. 433. 
In statute. Guardians, etc., v, Clark, etc., 9 B. & S. 682. 

and support. In will. Austin v, Austin, 4 Ch. Div. 233. 

of the child. In statute. Judson v, Blanchard, 4 Conn. 557. 



JCAJOBTFY. 



Gosling V. Veley, 7 Q. B. 406. 

In statute. Re Gilday, 11 Bank. Reg. 108. 

of the body. In statute. Taylor v, Griswold, 14 N. J. (L.) 222, 

of the electora. In constitution. Everett v. Smith, 22 Minn. 53. 

of the legal TOters. In statute. State v. Winkelmeier, 35 Mo. 

103 ; St. Joseph Tp. v. Rogers, 16 Wall. 644. 

of the members eleoted thereto, ht constitution. Osbum 1/. 



MAKE. 



Staley, 5 W. Va. 85 (13 Am. Rep. 640). 

In deed. Winter v, Williams, 4 Ad. & Ell. 251. 

a case. /// statute. Smith v, Harris, 43 Mo. 557. 

a deed. /// covenant. Washington v. Ogden, i Black, 450. 

defttult. In deed. Doe v, Marchetti, 1 B. & Ad. 720. 

over and grant. In deed. Jackson v, Alexander, 3 Johns. 484 

(3 Am. Dec. 517). 



MAKE. 



209 



MALICIOUSLY. 



ICAKE — Continued. 



snoh negro or mulatto » dsTO. In statute, U. S. v. Battiste, 

2 Sumn. 245. 

tme of, Grale v, Burnell, 7 Q. B. 861. 

void. In statute. King t^. Inhabitants, 9 B. & C. 837. 

to ft patent. In deed. Willis v. Bucher, 3 Wash. C. C. $69. 

will . In lease, McGrath v. Boston, 103 Mass. 371. 

or mamiitoturer. In statute. Rex v, Tregoning, 2 Younge ft 



of the estate. In statute, Forrester v. Forrester, 



MAinni. — 

J. 132. 

MAT.ADMTNISTBATIOir. 

37 Ala. 398. 

HAItE. heirs. In will, Angell v, Angela 9 Q. B. 35$. 

certain ohild. In indictment. Queen v, Kelly, i Jebb, 299. 

MAIiFEABAKCE. Coite v, Lynes, 33 Conn. 109. 



KAUGB. 



Mitchell V, Wall, 1 1 1 Mass. 492 ; Halley v. State, 63 Ala. 88 ; Lemay 
V, Williams, 32 Ark. 166; Dunn v. Hall, i Ind. 344; Dexter v. 
Spear, 4 Mason, 115; U. S. v. Harriman, i Hughes, 525; Buckley 
V, Knapp, 48 Mo. 152; Barbee v, Hereford, 48 Mo. 323; State v, 
Schoenwald, 31 Mo. 147; Com. v, Bonner, 9 Mete. 410; Com. v. 
York, 9 Mete. 93; Com. v, Snelling, 15 Pick. 337; Viele v. Gray, 
10 Abb. Pr. I ; True v. Plumley, 36 Me. 466; Elchberry v, Lerelle, 
2 Hilt. 40 ; State v. Turner, Wright, 20 ; State v, Gardiner, Wright, 
392; Grott V, Pulsifer, 122 Mass. 235; Dozier v. State, 26 Ga. 156; 
ex parte Wray, 30 Miss. 673; Pennsylvania v. Bell, Add. 156; 
Warren v. State, 4 Coldw. 130; State v, Decklotts, 19 Iowa, 447, 
Revel V, State, 26 Ga. 275 ; Nye v. People, 35 Mich. 16 ; Harris v. 
State, 8 Tex. (App.) 90; McKinney v. State, 8 Tex. (App.) 626. 

In statute. State v, Weiners, 66 Mo. 13 ; U. S. v, Taylor, 2 Sumn. 
584; U. S. V, Cutler, i Curt. 501. 

qfbrethonght. State v. Pike, 49 N. H. 399 ; Com. v. Drum, 58 

Pa. St. 9; U. S. V. Cornell. 2 Mason, 91 ; Jones v. State, 29 Ga. 
594; Green v. State, 13 Mo. 382 ; Com. v. Webster, 5 Cush. 306. 

in &ot. Pullen v, Gledden, 66 Me. 202. 



MAUGIOXJB. 



In statute. Hotchkiss v. Porter, 30 Conn. 414 ; Moore v, Stevenson, 
27 Conn. 14. 

exi)re88 . Parke v, Blackiston, 3 Harr. (Del.) 373 ; Anthony v. 

State, 21 Miss. 263; State v, Neal, 37 Me. 468; Com. v. Green, i 
Ashm. 289. 

implied . Parke v. Blackiston, 3 Harr. (Del.) 373; Anthony v. 

State, 21 Miss. 263: State v, Neal, 37 Me. 468; Com. v. Green, i 
Ashm. 289. 

mischief. Thomas v. State, 30 Ark. 433 ; State v. Robinson, 3 



MAUCXOUBLY 



27 



Dev. & B. (L.) 130 (32 Am. Dec.* 661). 

proseoation. Harf ham v. Whitney, 77 111. 32. 

willftQ and desertion. In statute, Stewart v, Stewart, 2 Swan, 

(Tenn.), 591 ; Rutledge v. Rutledge, 5 Sneed, 554; Majors v. Majors, 
I Tenn. Ch. 264; McClury's Appeal, 16 Smith (Pa.), 366. 

King V, Root, 4 Wend. 113(21 Am. Dec. 102); Com. v. Boynton, 
116 Mass. 343; Bridge v, 0*Key, 2 La. Ann. 968; Patterson v, 
D'Autrive, 9 La. Ann. 35. 

In plea, Tuttle v. Bishop, 30 Conn. 80. 



MALICIOUSLY, 



2X0 



MANNER. 



MAUOIOnSLY — Continued. 

In statute. Curtis v. The Hundred, 3 B. & C. 252 ; Com. v. McLaugh- 
lin, 105 Mass. 463 ; State v. Pierce, 7 Ala. 728 ; U. S. v, Gideon, i 
Minn. 292 ; State z/. Wilcox, 3 Yerg. 278 ; Com. v. Walden, 3 Cash. 
558; Com. V. Adams, 127 Mass. 15 ; U. S. i/. Ruggles, 5 Mason, 192; 
U. S. V, Coffin, I Sumn. 394 ; Com. v. Brooks, 9 Gray, 303. 

threatena to aoouae another of crime. In statute. Com. v. 

Goodwin, 122 Mass. 19. 

KAIaPBACnCE. In libel. Rodgers v. Kline, 56 Miss. 808 (31 Am. Rep. 389). 

MAIiT. King v. Wheeler, 2 B. & Aid. 350. 

liquor. Adler v. State, 55 Ala. 23 ; Watson v. State, 55 Ala. 160 ; 

State V, Starr, 67 Me. 242. 

MAIiTBEATHEHT. Com. v. Hackett, 2 Allen, 142. 

MAN. In statute. Kenyon v. People, 26 N. Y. 203 ; Smith v. Allen, 31 Ark. 

268; Silver z/. Ladd, 7 Wall. 219. 

MAlf AQED. or superintended by her husband. In statute. Youngworth 

V. Jewell, 1 5 Nev. 45. 

carelessly the locomotive. In plea. Smith v. Old Colony R. 

Co., 10 R. 1. 22. 

MANAaEMJSJN T. of the estate. In will. Watson v. Cleavland, 21 Conn. 542. 

person having the of the road. In statute. Queen v. Wilson. 



MANAGER. 



MANAGEBS. 
MANAGING. 



MANDAMUS. 
MANDATE. 

MANDATOBY. 
MANHOOD. 
MANIA. 
MANIFEST. 



MANNEB. 



18 Q. B. 348. 

In statute. Gibson 7/. Boston, etc., R. Co., L. R., 10 Q. B. 329. 

general business . Swazey v. Union Manfg Co., 43 Conn. 557. 

In charter. New York Inst, for the Blind v. Howe*s Ezrs.. 10 N. Y. 84. 

agent. In statute. Carr v. Commercial Bank, 19 Wis. 272 ; Up- 
per Miss. Trans. Co. v. Whittaker, 16 Wis. 220 ; Reddington v. Land 
Co., 19 Hun, 405 ; Emerson v. Auburn, etc., R. Co., 20 N. Y. (S. C.) 
150; Reddington v. Mariposa Land, etc., Co., 19 Hun, 405. 

State V. Commrs., i Mill. 55 (12 Am. Dec. 596)^ 

Waterman v. Gibson, 5 La. Ann. 672 ; re Fowler, 7 La. Ann. 207 ; 
Richardson v. Futtrell, 42 Miss. 525. 

— injunction. Isenberg v. East India Co., 33 L. J. Ch. 392. 

Hinton v. Hinton, i Dev. & B. (Eq.) 585. 

Hall V. Unger, 2 Abb. (U. S.) 507. 

In statute. Phile v. Anna, i Dall. 197. 

errors. In statute. Re Hermance, 71 N. Y. 481. 

other impediments. In statute. Re Davison, 4 Fed. Rep. i<orj. 

. oreated and . In statute. McClellan v. McClellan, 65 Me. s^o. 

In statute. Harris v. Doherty, 119 Mass. 142; Wells v. Bain, 75 Pa. 
St. 30. 

provided by law. In statute. Morris v. Howell, 35 Mo. 467. 

in aforesaid. In deed. Beer v. Sauter, 10 C. B. (N. S.) 440. 

In will. Woodall v. Woodall, 3 C. B. 350. 

in and form. In statute. Acraman v. Heineman, 16 Q. R 998. 

in like . In statute. Badger v. Daniel, 79 N. C. 372 ; re Thirty- 
fourth street, 81 Pa. St. 27. 

in suoh . In statute. State v. Ryan, 2 Mo. (App.) 309. 

insuoh as shall by law be prescribed. In constitution. Brown 

V. O'Connell, 36 Conn. 432. 



MANNER, 2X1 MANUSCRIPT, 



MAinrBB — Continued. 

in the same . In statute, Phillips v, Comm'rs, 122 Mass. 285; 

State V, Perkins, 4 Zab. 409; State v. Eureka Mining Co., 8 Nev. 15. 

MAHSION-HOUBE. In indictment. Com. v. Pennock, 3 S. & R. 199 ; State v, Sut* 

cliffe, 4 Strobh. 372 ; Daniel v, Coulsting, 7 M . & G. 122. 

MAKU. Ibrti. State v, Ray, 10 Ired. (L.) 39. 

MAKUAIi. oocupation. Shaw v, Poynter, 2 Ad. & Ell. 323. 

ICAJN Ul'ACTOBY. In statute, Furness v, R. Co., L. R., 6 Eq. Cas. 473 ; Queen v, 

R. Co., 3 Q. B. 166; Richards v, Swansea Imp. Co., 9 Ch. Div.425* 

stardh • In insurance policy, Peoria, etc., Ins. Co. v, Lewis, i& 

in. 553. 

MAinTFACrrUBE. King v, Wheeler, 2 B. & Aid. 350. 

In statute, Walton v. Potter, 3 Man. h G. 437. 

of bone. In statute, Schriefer v. Wood, 5 Blatchf. 21 5. 

or prooesB incident to the mannfboture of ootton. In statute, 

Whymper v, Harvey, 18 C. B. (N. S.) 248. 

new . In statute. Crane v. Price, 4 Man. & G. 580. 

right to . In grant 0/ patent right. May v, Chaffee, 2 Dill. 385. 

stage, prooeas or progress of . In statute. Rex v, Woodhead, i 

Moody & R. 549. 

JCANXTFACTUBED. In statute, Briggs v, Tillotson. 8 Johns. 304. 

articles. In statute, Lawrence v, Allen, 7 How. 793. 

copper. In statute, U. S. v. Potts. 5 Cranch, 284. 

goods. In statute, Parker v. R. Co., 6 El. h Bl. 102 ; U. S. v. 

A Quantity of Tobacco, 5 Ben. 112. 

coral cut or . In statute, Bailey v. Schell, 5 Blatchf. 195. 

In statute. Re Capital Publishing Co., 18 Bank. Reg. 319; 
Seeley v. Gwillem, 40 Conn. 106 ; Webley v, Webley, L. R., 7 Q. B. 
61 ; Meriden Britannia Co. v, Parker, 39 Conn. 451 ; re Kenyon, i 
Utah Ten 47 ; re Chandler, i Low. 478 ; Com. v, Bradley, 3 Gray, 
456. 

— of friction matches. In statute, U. S. v, Wedon, 3 Fed. Rep. 
623. 

of bone. In statute, Schrieffer v. Wood, 5 Blatchf. 215. 

of iron. In statute, U. S. v, Sarchet, Gilp. 27$. 

of metals. In statute, Meyer v, Arthur, i Otto, 570 ; Murphy v. 



Anson, 6 Otto, 131. 

of wooL In statute, U. S. v, Clarke, 5 Mason, 51. 

MAjn u jr Al7r u KING. company. In statute, Dudley v, Jamaica Pond Aqueduct 

Co., 100 Mass. 183. 

corporations. In statute. Byers v, Franklin Coal Co., 106 

Mass. 135. 

process. In statute. Palmer's Ship Co. v, Clayton, L. R., 4 Q. 

B. 209 ; Kent v, Astley, L. R., 5 Q. B. 19 ; 10 B. & S. 802. 

any fbrge or ftimace Ibr the of iron. In deed, Rogers v. 

Danforth, 9 N. J. (Eq.) 289. 

iron company. In statute. People v, Holdridge, 4 Laos. 511. 

Proctor V. Gilson, 49 N. H. 65. 

for land. In statute, Reg. v, Freke, S Ell. &. Bl . 947. 

In statute. Parton v. Prang, 3 Cliff. $37* 



MARE. 



212 



MARRIAGE. 



MABE. 

MABanr. 

MABGINS. 
MATilDiJs. 



ICABINEB. 



MABINSB8. 



MABrmCE. 



KABXEF. 



MABBIAGB, 



In indictment, Rez v. Chalkey, i Russ. & Ry. 259 ; Rex v, Welland, i 
Russ. k Ry. 494. 

In contract, Markham v, Jaudon, 49 Barb. 462. 

In statute. Ind. Cent. Canal Co. v. State, 53 Ind. 575. 

risk. Seybold v. U. S., 15 Wall. 202; Moigan v, U. S., 14 Wall. 

531 ; Goodman v. U. S., 17 Wall. 515. 

extraordinary risk. In charter-party, Leary v, U. S., 14 Wall. 

607. 

Brush V, Bogardus, 8 Johns. 1 57. 

In statute, Hubbard v, Hubbard, 8 N. Y. 196; Gwin's Will, i Tuck. 
44; ex parte Thompson, 4 Bradf. 154; Wilson v, Zuleuta, 14 Q. B. 
405 ; Slocum v. Smith, 2 Cranch C. C. 149. 

— or Beaman being at sea. In statute. Ex parte Thompson, 4 
Bradf. 154; Goods of Lay, 2 Curteis, 339; Warren v, Harding, 2 R. 
I. 133; Hubbard v. Hubbard, 8 N. Y. 199 ; re McMurdo, L. R., i P. 
& D. 541. 

and eeamen of the United Stfktes. In statute, Matthews v. 

Offley, 3 Sumn. 113. 

oontraot. Grant v, Poillon, 20 How. 162 ; People's Ferry Co. v. 



Beers, 20 How. 393 ; The Moses Taylor, 4 Wall. 411; Roach v. Chap- 
man, 22 How. 129; Ward v, Thompson, 22 How. 330; Morewood v. 
Larue, 23 How. 435 ; Insurance Co. v, Dunham, 1 1 Wall, i ; Andrews 
V. Wall, 3 How. 568; Thorsen v. The J. R Martin, 26 Wis. 496; 
Edwards v, Elliott, 21 Wall. 532 ; The Walsh, 5 Ben. 72. 

— prifle. Messrs. Alexander's cotton, 2 Wall. 404. 



Moorman v, Hoge, 2 Sawyer, 86. 

and lay out the bounds. In statute, Allen v. Smith, 12 N. J. (L.) 

159. 



the boundary line. In statute. Keller v. Young, 78 Pa. St 166 

Hilliard Flume Co. v. Woods, i Wyom. Terr. 397. 

OTert. Lee v, Bayes, 18 C. B. 599 ; Wilkinson v. King, 2 Camp. 

335; Anonymous, 12 Mod. 521; L'Evesque de Worcester's case. 
Moore, 360; Taylor ?/. Chambers, Cro. Jac. 68; Clinton v. Chancel- 
lor, Moore, 624 ; Lyons v, De Pass, 1 1 Ad. &. El. 326 ; Hill v. Smith, 
4 Taunt. 520; Crane v, London Dock Co., 5 Best & S. 313 ; S. C, 33 
L. J. Q. B. 224. 

gardener. In statute. Ex parte Hammond, i De Gex's R C. 93. 

plaoe. In stcUuie, Attorney-General v. Mayor, L. R., 6 H. L, 

303 ; Smith v. City of Newbern, 70 N. C. 14 ; Mayor of Savannah v. 
Wilson, 49 Ga. 476. 

prioe. In statute. Goodwin v, U. S., 2 Wash. C. C. 493. 

value. Atchison, etc., R. Co. v. Stanford, 12 Kans. 354; Mur- 



ray V, Stanton 99 Mass. 345. 
In statute, Harding v. Whitney, 4 Cliff. C. C. 96. 

ooming to . In statute. Boteler v. Corporation, 2 Cranch C. C. 

676. 

Hyde v. Hyde, L. R., i P. & D. 133 ; re Beverson, 47 Cal. 621 ; Port v. 
Port. 70 III. 484; Newbury V. Brunswick, 2 Vt. 151 (19 Am. Dec. 
703); Roche V. Washington, 19 Ind. 53 ; Inhabitants of Milford v. In- 
habitants of Worcester, 7 Mass. 48 ; Dickerson v. Brown, 49 Miss. 
357 ; Rose v, Clark, 8 Paige, 574; Cheney v, Arnold, 15 N. Y. 345 ; 



MARRIAGE. 



213 



MATERIALS. 



KABBIAGE— 



MABBIED. 



MABTIAIa. 
MASTER. 



Continued. 

Starr v. Peck, i Hill, 270; Brook v. Brook, 9 H. L. Cas. 193 ; Cau- 
jolle V, Ferrie, 26 Barb. 177 ; 23 N. Y. 90 ; 4 Bradf. 28 ; Jackson v, 
Winne, 7 Wend. 47 ; Cla3rton v, Wardell, 4 N. Y. 230 ; Fornshill v. 
Murray, i Bland, 479 ; Graham v, Bennett, 2 Cal. 503 ; Townshend 
V. Griffin, 4 Harr. (Del.)44o; Cabell v. Cabell, 1 Mete. (Ky.) 319; 
Starr v, Hamilton, i Deady, 268; Jenkins v, Jenkins, 2 Dana, 102 ; 
Duntze v. Levett, Ferg. 68 ; Ditson v. Ditson, 4 R. I. 87. 

oontraot. In statute. Johnson v. Johnson, 23 Mo. 561 ; Develin 

t/. Rigsbee, 4 Ind. 464. 

actual . State v. Winckley, 14 N. H. 480. 

a^^ement made in consideration of— ^-. In statute, Harrison 
V. Cage, I Ld. Raym. 386; Cork v. Baker, Strange, 34; Jordan v. 
Money, 5 H. L. Cas. 207 ; Philpot v, Wolcot, Skinner, 24 ; Brenner 
V, 3renner, 48 Ind. 462 ; Short v, Stotts, 58 Ind. 29 ; Rainbolt v. 
East, 56 Ind. 538 ; Clark v, Pendleton, 20 Conn. 495 ; Riley v. Riley, 
25 Conn. 154; Dunn v. Tharp, 4 Ired. (Eq.) 7 ; Wilbur v, Johnson, 
58 Mo. 600; Child V, Pearl, 43 Vt. 224; Henry v, Henry, 27 Ohio 
St. 121 ; re Willoughby, 1 1 Paige Ch. 257 ; Brown v. Conger, 8 Hun, 
625 ; Dygert v, Remerschnider, 32 N. Y. 629 ; Withers v. Richard- 
son, 5 T. B. Mon, 94 (17 Am. Dec. 44.) 

flwt of . Steadman v, Powell, i Add. Ecc. 58; State v. Winkley, 

14 N. H. 480. 

in right of the . In statute. Cason v. Cason, 28 Mo. 47. 

man. Vandolf v. Otis, i Oregon, 1 53. 

shall be . In statute, Kelly v. Owen, 7 Wall. 496. 

without ever having been • In deed, Emmons v, Bradford, 1 3 

Ch. Div. 495. 

without having been . In will. Re Ball, 1 1 Ch. Div. 270. 

shall another person. In statute. Queen v. Allen, L. R., i C. 

• C. R. 371. 

law. Luther v, Borden, 7 How. i ; Johnson v, Jones, 44 111. 



142; Griffin v, Wilcox, 21 Ind. 370; re Egan, 5 Blatchf. 319. 

In statute. Weed v. State, 55 Ala. 14. 

orderk. In statute. Lancaster v, Woodboat Hardin, 28 Mo. 

351. 

or mariners. In contract, Spinette v. Atlas Steam Co., 14 Hun, 

100. 



or other person entitled to the service of any slave. In 

statute, Scott v. State, 31 Miss. 475. 

Edmonson v, Phillips, 73 Mo. 62 ; Pendleton v, Franklin, 7 N. T. 508 ; 
Adams v. Way, 32 Conn. 161 ; U. S. v, Tenbrook, Pet C. C. 180; 
State V, Brown, 79 N. C. 642. 

allegation. In plea. Miller v, Brumbaugh, 7 Kas. 343 ; Wooden 

V. Waffle, 6 How. Pr. 146. 

defendant. Waddell v, Lanier, 54 Ala. 440. 

fbots. Digby v, American Central Ins. Co., 3 Mo. (App.) 603. 

issue. Wooden v, Wafflle, 6 How. Pr. 145; Newman v. Otto, 4 



Sandf. 668. 

nsed. In statute. Young v. The Orphans, 119 Mass. 179- 



MATERIALS. In contract. Camac v. Warriner, i C. B. 364- 



MATERIALS. 



214 



MAY. 



MATERIALS — Continued. 

In mortgage. Farmers' Loan, etc., Co. v. Com. Bk., 15 Wis. 424; 
Farmers', etc.. Trust Co. v. Commercial Bk., 11 Wis. 211. 

In statute. Hazard Powder Co. v, Byrnes, 12 Abb. Pr. 469; Qnimby 
V. Sloan, 2 E. D. Smith, 594; Dixon v. La Farge, i E. D. Smith, 322 ; 
Cutts V, Ward. 8 B. & S. 287 ; U. S. v. Ten Brock, 2 Wheat 248 ; 
Pet. C. C. 180. 

for a lottery. In statute. Com. v, Dana, 2 Mete. 329. 

for building. In city ordinance. Hundhausen z/. Bond, 36 W^is. 29. 

person performing labor or ftumiflhing of any kincL In 



KATTEB. 



statute. McCormack v. Water Co., 40 Cal. 186. 

* 

— arifldng upon the trial. In statute. U. S. v. Green. 6 Peters, 28. 

— in avoidanoe. In statute. Cooper v. Tappan, 9 Wis. 368. 

— in demand. In statute. Blakeslee v. Murphy, 44 Conn. 188; 
Huntt'. Rockwell, 41 Conn. 51 ; Sullivan v. Vail, 42 Conn. 90. 

— in dispute. In statute. Dumphy t/. Jaudon, 13 Cal. 30; U. S. 



KATTEB8. 



V, Mose, 3 Cranch, 159; Lee v. Watson, i Wall. 337; Wilson zf. 
Daniel, 3 Dall. 404 ; Mason v. Oglesby, 2 La. Ann. 793 ; Frellsen v. 
Cofley, 2 La. Ann. 91 1 ; Owen v. Boyd, 7 La. Ann. 109 ; Cornell v, 
Geddes, 10 La. Ann. 170 ; Klein v. Wild, 12 La. Ann. 87. 

— of form. In statute. U. S. v. Noelke, 17 Blatchf. 558. 

— of law. In constitution. Lovinier v, Pearce, 70 N. C. 167. 

— and proceedings in bankruptcy. In statute. Kidder v. Hor- 
robin, 72 N. Y. 159. 

— in controversy. Bremer v. Baircl, 60 Ala. 153. 

— in difference. Webster v. Lee, 5 Mass. 336. 

— of mere account In statute. Birmingham Gkis Co. v. Ratcli^ 
L. R., 6 Ex. 224. 

— of subsistence for man. Sledd v. Com., 19 Gratt. 813. 



JIOLTUBBD. 
J^OLTUBTTY. 



MAzncnM. 



In statute. Hays v. Boyer, 59 Ind. 341. 

Lowry v. Mountjoy, 6 Call, 55. 

at . Leigh v. Knickerbocker Ins. Co., 26 La. Ann. 436. 

In charter. U. S. v. Union Pacific R. Co., i Otto, 72. 

In will. Condict v. King, 13 N. J. (Eq.) 375; Carpenter v. Bouldin* 
48 Md. 122. 

width. In statute. Reg. v. Rigby, 14 Q. B. 697. 



Cooke V. Spears, 2 Cal. 412 ; Hill v. Duncan, no Mass. 328; Quinn zr. 
Wallace, 6 Whart. 452 ; Ball v. Fogg, 67 Mo. 481 ; re Ballantine, 45 
Cal. 696 ; Leavenworth & Des Moines R. R. v. Platte Co., 42 Mo. 71 ; 
State V. Holt Co., 39 Mo. 521. 

In statute. Schaeffer v. Lohman, 34 Mo. 68 ; Crake v. Powell, 2 EL & 
Bl. 210. 

{Mandatory). Supervisors v. U. S., 4 Wall. 425 ; Malcolm v. Rogers, 5 Cow. 188 (15 

Am; Dec. 464) ; Spaulding v. Lees, 4 Mo. (App.) 351. 

in deed. Long Island R. Co. v. Conklin, 29 N. Y. 572. 

In statute. Phelps v. Hawley, 52 N. Y. 23 ; Pacific R. Co. v. Reynolds. 
8 Kas. 623 ; State v. Newark, 4 Dutch. 491 ; Beach v. Woodhull. 
Pet. C. C. 2; Reid v. Bainbridge, i South. 351 ; Carhart v. Miller. 
2 South. 573; Mitchell v. Pike, 17 Hun, 142; Hagadon v. Roux, 72 
N. Y. 583; State ?/. Gould, 11 Mete. 224; Com. v. Smith, in Mass. 



JI£A Y. 215 MEADO WS, 



{Mandaiory) — Continued. 

407; Lyon V, Rice, 41 Conn. 245; Gillinwater v, R. Co., 13 111. 3; 
Kane v. Footh, 70 III. 587 ; Minor v. Mechanics' Bk., i Pet. 46 ; 
Supervisors v. U. S., 4 Wall. 435 ; re Ballentine, 45 Cal. 696 ; Thomp- 
son V, Carroll, 22 How. 422 ; Kelly v. Morse, 3 Neb. 222 ; Steines 
V. Franklin Co., 48 Mo. 167; State v. Saline Co., 48 Mo. 390; Low 
V, Dunham, 61 Me. 566; Nave z/. Nave, 7 Ind. 122; Phelps t/. Haw- 
ley, 3 Lans. 160; Blake v, Portsmouth, etc.. R. Co., 39 N. H. 435; 
Bausemer v. Mace, 18 Ind. 27 ; People z/. Supervisors, 51 N. Y. 401 ; 
People V, Com., 4 Neb. 150; Com. v. Haynes, 107 Mass. 194; St. 
Louis, etc., R. Co. v. Teters, 6^ 111. 144; Walley's Estate, 11 Nev. 
260; People V, Brooks, i Denio, 457; Appleton v. Warner. 51 Barb. 
270; State V, Board of Canvassers, 36 Wis. 498 ; Adrtancet/. Super- 
visors, 12 How. Pr. 224; Darby v, Condit, i Duer, 599; Fowler v. 
Perkins, 77 111. 271 ; Steple v. Borough of Elizabeth, 27 N. J. (L.) 
407 ; Buffalo, etc., Plankroad Co. v. Com., 10 How. Pr. 237 ; New- 
burgh, etc., Tp. Co. V. Miller, 5 Johns. Ch. loi ; Cutler 7/. Howard, 
9 Wis. 309 ; ex parte Banks, 28 Ala. 28 ; ex parte Simonten, 9 Port. 
390 ; Supervisors v. U. S, 4 Wall. 435 ; Galena v. Amy, 5 Wall. 705 ; 
Randolph Co. v. Ralls, 18 111. 29; Ritchie v. Franklin Co., 22 Wall. 
77 ; Phillips T/. Fadden, 125 Mass. 200; State t/. Laughlin, 73 Mo. 443 ; 
Chetwood v. State Bk., 2 Halst. 32 ; Whittington, ex parte, 34 Ark. 
394; Coopers v. Mayor, 55 Cal. 599; Bell v. Crane, L. R., 8 Q. B. 
481 ; Cutler V. Howard, 9 Wis. 310; Rice r. Cutler, 17 Wis. 357. 

iPermissive), In statute, Cooke v. State Nat. Bk. of Boston, 52 N. Y. 96 ; De 

Bewoort v. Welsh, 7 B. & C. 278 ; Com. v, Haynes, 107 Mass. 196 ; 
State V, Holt County Court, 39 Mo. 521 ; Minor t/. Mechanics' Bk., 
I Pet. 46 ; Fowler v, Perkins, 77 111. 271 ; State v, Sweetser, 53 Me. 
438 ; Devine's Case, 1 1 Abb. Pr. 90 ; Medberry t/. Swan, 46 N. Y. 
200 ; Williams v. People, 24 N. Y. 405. 

be. In statute. Lewis v, Bourbon Co., 12 Kas. 206; County of 

Callaway v, Foster, 3 Otto. 573. 

be designated. In statute, Durfee v, Plaisted, 38 Cal. 80. 

be instituted. In statute. South Carolina v, Gaillard, 1 1 Otto, 



433. 

have. In will, Wilkinson v, Adam, i Ves. & B. 422 ; Heeney 

V, Brooklyn Ben. Soc, 33 Barb. 360. 

in anywise. Gregory v. Kanouse, 11 N. J. (L.) 62. 

pay. In contract. Fame Ins. Co. Appeal, 83 Pa. St. 306. 

receive. In contract, Greene v, Robinson, 41 Conn. 470. 

saw. In contract, Wemple v, Stewart, 22 Barb. 1 54. 

all claims and demands that arise. In contract, Moran 

V, Prather, 23 Wall. 492. 

Godfrey v. People, 5 Hun, 369 ; Chick v. State, 7 Humph. 161 ; Adams 
V. Barrett, 5 Ga. 404 ; Com. v, Newell, 7 Mass. 244 ; State v, Dan- 
forth, 3 Conn. 112 ; Eskridge v. State, 25 Ala. 30 ; Scott v. Com., 6 S. 
k. R. 224 ; Riflemaker v. State, 25 Ohio St. 395 ; Com. v Hawkins, 
II Bush, 603 ; State v. Vowels, 4 Oreg. 324 ; State v. Brown, 60 Mo. 
141 ; Foster v. People, 50 N. Y. 598 ; Godfrey v. People. 63 N. Y. 
207; Tully V, People, 67 N. Y. 15 ; State v, Briley, 8 Port. 472. 

of the dty. In will, Dunbar v, Soule. 129 Mass. 285. 

sworn befbre . In jurat. Queen v, Silkstone, 2 Q. B. 520. 

Church V, Meeker, 34 Conn. 421. 



MEANS. 



2l6 



MEMBER. 



In lease, Spencer v, Marriott, i B. & C. 459. 

of tatiaflujtioii. Kingston v. Curry, 62 Ala. 408. 

of support. In statute, Volans v. Owen, 74 N. Y. 526 ; Meidel 

V. Anthis, 71 III. 241 ; Wightman v, Devere, 33 Wis. 570; Schneider 
V, Hosier, 21 Ohio St. 99; Mulford v. Clewell, 21 Ohio St 191 ; Wool- 
heather V, Risley, 38 Iowa, 189; Hackett v. Smelsey, ^^ 111. 109; 
Hayes v, Phelan, 4 Hun, 738. 

by of. In statute, U. S. v. Caigo of Sugar, 3 Sawyer, 48. 

by of a fldfle pretense. In statute. Com. v. Walker, 108 Mass. 



MECHANIC. 



MEDICINE. 
MEDICINES. 



MEET. 



ETINQ. 



IlEMBEa. 



312. 
by any other 
by whose — 



In statute, McDade v. People, 29 Mich. 50. 



In statute. Fitch burg v, Cheshire Co., 1 10 Mass. 210. 

to take proper . In bond. Hoard v. Garner, 10 N. Y. 261. 

other . In constitution, Crosby v, Lyon, 37 Cal. 242. 

In statute. Queen v, Aulton, 3 El. & El. 568. 

take for the formation of a oompany. In contract, Cooke v. 

Barr, 39 Conn. 304. 

In indictment. State v, Morey, 2 Wis. 494; State v, Patrick, 79 N. C. 
656. 

In statute, Duncan v, Bateman, 23 Ark. 327 ; Whitcomb v, Reid. 31 
Wis. 567 ; Gulledge v, Preddy, 32 Ark. 433 ; Berks Co. v, Bertolet, 
13 Pa. St 525, 

or other person* In statute, Raeder v. Bensbexg, 6 Mo. (App.) 

446. 

skill. Perfection Window Cleaner Co. t/. Bosley, 2 Fed. Rep. 576; 
Hotchkiss V. Greenwood, 1 1 How. 248 ; Stimpson v, WiX>dman, 10 
Wall. 117 ; Ransom v. New York, i Fish, 252; Larrabee v. Cortlan, 
Taney, 180; Haselden «/. Ogden, 3 Fish, 378; Phillips v. Page. 24 
How. 164; Dunbar ?/. Myers, 94 U. S. 187, 

In will, Bridgman v. Dove, 3 Atk. Ch. 202. 

In statute. Berry v, Henderson, L. R., 5 Q. B 296. 

Mills V, Perkins, 120 Mass. 41. 

attendance. In statute. State v, Winneshiek Co., 52 Iowa, 579. 

-. ftumlty. In statute. Regents v, Williams, 9 Gill & J. 365 (31 

Am. Dec. 72). 

or meohanioal treatment for disease. In insurance paUcy, 

Bayliss v. Travelers' Ins. Co., 14 Blatchf. 143. 

services. In statute. Bibber v. Simpson, 59 Me. 181. 

preparations or compositions. In statute, Dallet v. Smythe, 



6 Blatchf. 421. 
In statute, Loveioy v, Dolan, 10 Cush. 499. 

or assemble. In statute. Marshall v. Fox, L. R., 6 Q. R 370. 

In indictment. Com. v, Desmond, 122 Mass. 12. 
end on. In statute. The Nichols, 7 Wall. 656. 

for raising money for building or repairing a sdhooL-house . 

In statute, Davis v. School Dist., 43 N. H. 381 

of the legislature. In statute, McAfee v. Russell, 29 Miss. 84. 



In statute, Norris v. Cooper, 3 H. L. Cas. 161 ; Sinden v. Banks. 3 El. 
& Bl. 631. 



i:H,i:i:H:*: 



MEMBER. 217 MEMORANDUM. 

TUTRMBtni — Continued. 

of the flonily. In statuU, Chicago, etc., R. Co. v. Chisholm, 79 

111. 584. 

indiTidTial . In statute. Linden v. Banks, 3 El. & Bl. 631. 

In statute. People v. Ins. Co., 78 N. Y. 114. 

ofthehouaeholdor ftmily. In statute. May z^. Smith, 48 Ala. 

487. 
all the In statute. Curtis v, Harlow, 12 Mete. 3. 

In statute. Craft's Appeal, 42 Conn. 153; Bissell v. Beckwith, 32 
Conn. 509. 

MEMOBANDUM. In will, Dickinson z/. Stidolph, 1 1 C. B. 356. 

oheck. In statute, U. S. v. Isham, 17 Wall. 496; Tumbull z/. 

Osborne, 12 Abb. Pr. (N. S.) 200. 

letter or other writing. In statute. Rein v. I^ane, 8 B. & S. 83. 



note or in writing. In statute. Sanderson v. Jackson, 2 Bos. & 

P. 238; Schneider v. Norris, 8 Mau. & S. 286; Pitts z/. Beckett. 13 
M. & W. 743 ; Reuss v. Picksley, L. R., i Ex, 342 ; Stewart z/. 
Eddowes, L. R, 9 C. P. 31 1 ; Sanborn v. Flagler, 9 Allen (Mass.), 474 ; 
Himrod Furnace Co. v. Cleveland, etc., R. Co., 30 Ohio St. 451 ; 
Argus Co. V. Mayor, etc., of Albany, 55 N. Y. 495 ; Griffin v. Rem- 
bert, 2 S. C. 410; Bird v. Blasse, 2 Ventris, 361 ; Brettel v. Williams, 
4 Exch. 623; Waul V. Kirkman, 27 Miss. 823 ; Lanz v. McLaughlin) 
14 Minn. 72; Lowber v. Connit, 36 Wis. 176; Thayer v. Luce, 22 
Ohio St. 62 ; Justice v. Lang, 42 N. Y. 493 ; Western Un. Tel. Co, v. 
Chicago, etc., R. Co., 86 111. 246; Barickman v. Kuykendall, 6 
Blackf. (Ind.) 21; Ellis z^. Deadman, 4 Bibb (Ky.), 466 ; Evans z/. 
Prothero, i De G., M. &G. 572; Williams v. Morris, 95 U. S. 444; 
Batturs v. Sellers, 5 Harr. & J. (Md.) 117 ; Saunderson v. Jackson, 2 
• Bos. & P. 238; Hawkins z/. Chace, 19 Pick. (Mass.) 552; Berry v. 
Coombe, i Pet. (U. S.) 640; Bourland v. County of Peoria, 16 111. 
538 ; Hanson v. Barnes, 3 Gill & J. (Md.) 359 ; Barney v. Patterson, 
6 Harr. & J. (Md.) 182; Elfe v. Gadsden, 2 Rich. (S. C.) Law, 373; 
Nichol V. Ridley, 5 Yerg. (Tenn.) 63 ; Tufts v. Plymouth Gold Min. 
Co., 14 Allen (Mass.), 407; Johnson z'. Trinity Ch. Soc., 11 Allen 
(Mass.), 123 Chase v. City of Lowell, 7 Gray (Mass.), 33 ; Rhoades v. 
Castner, 12 Allen (Mass.), 130; Grimes v. Hamilton County, 37 
Iowa, 290 ; Jackson v. Lowe, i Bing. 9 ; Dobeel v. Hutchinson, 3 Ad. 
& E. 371 ; Laythrop v. Bryant, 2 Bing. N. R. 735 ; Scarlett v. Stein, 
40 Md. 512 ; Sawney v. Crowther, 3 Bro. C. C. 318 ; De Beil v. Thomp- 
son, 3 Beav. 469 ; Coles v. Trecothick, 9 Ves. 234 ; Peirce v. Corf, L. 
R-» 9 Q- B- 210; Washington Ice Co. v. Webster, 62 Me. 341 ; Mayer 
V. Adrian, 77 N. C. 83 ; Williams v. Morris, 95 U. S. 444; Williams v. 
Jordan, 6 Ch. Div. 517; Buxton v. Rust, L. R., 7 Exch. 279; Rush- 
ton V. Whatmore, 8 Ch. Div. 467 ; Wood v. Midgley, 5 De G.. M. & 
G. 41 ; Ridgway v. Wharton, 6 H. L. C. 238 ; Briggs v. Munchon, 56 
Mo. 467 ; Wilkinson v. Evans, L. R., i C. P. 407 ; Lemed v. Wanne- 
macher, 9 Allen (Mass.), 412; Allen v. Bennet, 3 Taunt. 169; Ide «/. 
Stanton, 15 Vt. 685; Thayer v. Luce, 22 Ohio St. 62; Peobody v. 
Speyers, 56 N Y. 230; Work z/. Cowick, 81 111. 317; Beckwith z/. 
Talbot, 95 U. S. 289; Boydell v. Dnimmond, 11 East, 142; Johnson 
V. Dodgson, 2 Mees. & W. 623 ; Kennett v, Milbank, i Moo. & L. 
102; Lechmere v. Fletcher, i Cromp. & M. 623; Jacob v. Kirk, 2 
Moo. & R. 224; Salmon Falls Man. Co. v. Goddard, 14 How. 446; 
28 



MEMORANDUM. 2X8 MERCHANT 

HSMOBAJIDUM — Continued. 

Grafton v. Cummings, 7 Reporter, 545 ; Gill v, Bicknell, 2 Cush. 
(Mass.) 355 ; First Bap. Ch. of Ithaca v. Bi^elow, 16 Wend. (N. Y.) 
28 ; Howes v, Forster, i Moo. & R. 368 ; Rucker v, Camroeyer, i Esp, 
105; Hicks V, Hankin, 4 Esp. 114; Chapman v. Partridge, 5 Esp. 
256; Dickerson z/. Lileval, i Stark. 128; Soames v, Spencer, i 
Dowl. & R 32 ; Short v, Sparkman, 2 Barn, k. Ad. 962 ; Grant v. 
Fletcher, 5 Barn. & C. 436 ; Goom v, Aflalo, 6 Bam. & C. 117 ; True- 
man V. Loder, 11 Ad. & E. 589; Lievewright v, Archibald, 17 Q. B. 
103 ; Leary v. Physic, 5 Bam. & C. 234 ; Merritt v, Clason, 12 Johns. 
(N. Y.) 102; Clason v. Bailey, 14 Johns. (N. Y.) 484; Schneiders. 
Norris, 2 Maule & S. 286 ; Pitts v, Becket, 13 Mees & W.743; Vielie 
V. Osgood, 8 Barb. (N. Y.) 130; McDowel v. Chambers, i Strobh. (S, 
C.) Eq. 347; Draper t/, Pattina, 2 Speers (S. C), 292; Hazard v. Day, 
14 Allen (Mass.), 487 ; Palmer v. Marquette & Pac. Rolling Mill Co. 
32 Mich. 274; Godwin v. Francis, L. R., 5 C. P. 295: Williams v. 
Bacon, 3 Gray (Mass.), 387 ; Hewes v. Taylor, 70 Pa. St 387 ; Pricker 
V. Thomlinson, i Man. & G. 772; Thornton v. Kempster, 3 Taunt. 
786; Gibson V. Holland, L. R., i C. P. i ; Nelson v, Dubois, 13 
Johns. (N. Y.) 175 ; Hudson v. King, 2 Tenn. 560; Bill v, Baraent, 9 
Mees. & W. 36 ; Bailey v. Sweeting, 9 C. B. (N. S.) 843 ; Rose v. 
Cunynghame, 11 Ves. 550; Ivory v. Murphy, 36 Mo. 534; Barclay 
V. Bates, 2 Mo. (App.) 139; Battars v. Sellers, 5 H. & J. 117 (9 Am. 
Dec. 492) ; Sherburne v, Shaw, i N. H. 1 57 (8 Am. Dec. 47) ; Nelson 
T/. Sanborne, 2 N. H. 413 (9 Am. Dec. 108); Scarrettz/. St John's 
Church, 7 Mo. (App.) 174. 

of the oountry. Rex z/. Johnson, 5 N. H. 520 (22 Am. Dec. 472) 



MENIAIte Bervant. Nicoll v. Graves, 17 C. B. (N. S.) 29 ; Nowlen v. Abbott 

2 Cromp. M. & R. 54; Todd v, Kerrich, 8 Ex. 151 ; Johnson v, Blen- 
kensopp, 5 Jur. 870. 

In indictment, Pickett v. State, 60 Ala. ^^, 

In insurance policy, Duplantz v. Com. Ins. Co., Anth. 114; Home 
Ins. Co. V. Baltimore Warehouse Co., 3 Otto, 527. 

In plea, Weston v, McDowell, 20 Mich. 353. 

In statute. Gay's Gold. 13 Wall. 358 ; The Maine City, 6 Fed. Rep. 
413 ; U. S. V, One Sorrel Horse, 22 Vt 655 ; Pray v, Mitchell, 60 
Me. 430 ; Fine v, Hornsby, 2 Mo. (App.) 61 ; Citizens' Bk. v. Nan- 
tucket Steamboat Co., 2 Story, 17. 

In treaty, U. S.v. Amistead, 15 Pet 518. 

in trust or on commission. In insurance policy, Ins. Co. v 

Moffatt L. R., 7 C. P. 25. 

suoh as is usually kept in country stores. In insurance pol- 



icy, Franklin, etc., Ins. Co. v, Updegraff, 42 Pa. St. 350. 

grain and other . In statute, Kent v, Liverpool, etc., Ins. Co. 

26 Ind. 294. 

other legal . In statute, Cockburn v, Alexander, 6 C. B. 791. 

trade of . In statute. Spring v. Gay, 6 Peters, 151. 

transportation of . In statute. Citizens' Bk. v. Nantucket 

Steamboat Co., 2 Story, 16. 

MEBCHANDISBS. In statute. Fisher v, Lee, 12 Ad. <S: Ell. 623. 

Hammond v, Jethro, 2 Brownl. & C. 99, note; Mayor of London v, 
Welks, 2 Salk. 445. 



MERCHANT, 



2x9 



MEXICANS. 



— Continued. 

In band, Josselyn t/. Parson, L. R., 7 Ex. 127. 

In statute. State v. Wells, 28 Mo. 565 ; State v. Martin, 5 Mo. 562 ; 
State V, West. 34 Mo. 424 ; Sute v, Whittaker, 33 Mo. 457 : re 
Merrett, 7 Fed. Rep. 853 ; Anderson v. Com., 9 Bush, 569 ; Thom- 
son V. Hopper, i W. & S. 467 ; Campbell v. Finck, 2 Duv. 107 ; 
Com. V. McGeorge, 9 B. Monr. 3 ; Cole v. Com., 8 Dana, 31. 

appraiser. Belcher v, Linn, 24 How. 508. 

exporter. In license. Camel o v. Britten, 4 B. & Aid. 184. 

or trader. In statute. Re Duff, 4 Fed. Rep. 519. 

or tradesman. In statute. Re Woodward, 8 Ben. 563. 

In contract. Wood v, U. S., 1 1 Ct. of CI. 680 ; Hamilton v, Gan- 
yard, 34 Barb. 204 ; Crane v, Roberts, 5 Me. 419. 

quality. In contract, Sprague v, Blake, 20 Wend. 61. 

fWr sassafras wood. In contract, Tye v, Fynmore, 3 Camp. 462. 



MEEtGEDLETTS. 



MEBELY. 



MEBTTS. 



\mj^x^:^ 



aoooxmts. In statute. Spring v. Gray, 6 Peters, 151; Fox v, Fisk, 

7 Miss. 328 ; Ramchander v, Hammond, 2 Johns. 200 ; Mandeville 
V, Wilson, 5 Cranch, 15 : Murray v. Coster, 20 Johns. 576; Coster 
V, Murray, 5 Johns. Ch. 522; Atwaterv. Fowler, i Edw. Ch. 417; 
Hussey v, Burgwyn, 6 Jones (L.), 385 ; Chew v. Baker, 4 Cranch 
C. C. 696. 

Foshay v. Town of Glen Haven, 25 Wis. 291. 

by reason of having made an entry. In statute, Randall v, 

Stevens, 2 El. & Bl. 641. 

Palmer v, Burnside, i Woods, 182. 

In statute, Cobb v, Harrison, 20 Wis. 628 ; Bowman v, De Peyster, 2 
Daly, 203 ; Tracy v. Steam Faucet Co., i E. D. Smith, 349 ; St. John 
V. West, 4 How. Pr. 329 ; Megrath v. Van Wyck, 3 Sandf. 750. 

of the action. In statute, Franke v, Nunnenmacher, 23 Wis. 299. 

defense on the . In agreement. Hart v. Withers, i Pen. & 

Watts, 285 (21 Am. Dec. 382). 

material to the of the case. In statute, Harvey v, Johnston, 

6 C. B. 305. 

not on the . In order, Reg. v, St. Anne's, 9 Q. B, 882. 

In statute, Thomas v. Evens, i El., B. & El. 171. 

process. In statute, Mainwaring v, Milner, 9 B. & S. 1007. 

profits. In statute, Thompson v, Borner, 60 Barb. 463 ; Pac- 

quette v, Pickness, 19 Wis. 223 ; Leiand v, Tousey, 6 Hill, 328. 

pork. In receipt. Hale v, Milwaukee Dock Co., 29 Wis. 488. 



MEXICAJTS. 



Fenn v, Grafton, 2 Bing. N. C. 617. 

In statute. Water-works Co. v. Mile End, 17 Q. B. 520. 

mansion-house and of her deceased husband. In statute. 

Grimes v, Wilson, 4 Blackf. 331. 

In deed, Bennett v. Herring, 3 C. B. (N. S.) 374. 

or plantation. In statute, Orrick v, Robbins, 34 Mo. 226. 

In statute, Meyer v, Arthur, 91 U. S. 570. 

mannfbotures of . In statute, Meyer v, Arthur, 91 U. S. 570 : 

May V, Simmons, 4 Fed. Rep. 502. 

In treaty, Tobin v, Walkinshaw, i McAllister, 195. 



J 



MICHAELMAS. 



MINISTER. 



mUTABY. 



laCHAJiIJIAS. Indeed, Finley t/. Wood, i Esp. 178; Doe v, Benson, 4 R& Aid 

588 ; Doe V, Lea, 11 East. 312. 

MILE. dlgtanoe of half a . In deed. Leigh v. Hand. 9 R & C. 774. 

dwells more than twenty firom the defendant. In statute^ 

Lake v. Butler, 5 El. & Bl. 96 ; Stokes v, Russell, 14 C. R (fj^. 

law. Johnson v, Jones, 44 111. 142. 

or naval aervioe. In insurance policy. Welts v. Conn. Mut. 

Life Ins. Co., 48 N. Y. 36. 

or naorped power* In insurance policy. Boon v. iEtna Ins. 

Co., 40 Conn. 574. 

in the eervioe of the United States. In statute. Stuart t/. U. 

S., 18 Wall. 84. 

soldiers in actual — 

18 Iowa, 513. 



servloe. In statute, Abrahams v, Bartlett, 



MILIi. 



MILUS. 



MINE. 



MINEBAL. 



MINEBAI.S. 



MINES. 



MINISTEB. 



In deed, Farrar v, Stackpole, 6 Greenl. 154 (19 Am. Dec. 201). 

In statute. State v. Livermore, 44 N. H. 386. 

In will, Whitney v. Olney, 3 Mason, 280. 

dam. Armond v. Green Bay, etc. Canal Co., 35 Wis. 41. 

iron. In contract, Carondelet Iron Works v. Moore, 78 III. 65 

privilege. In deed, Moore v. Fletcher, 16 Me. 63. 

property. In deed. Van Horn v, Richardson, 24 Wis. 248. 

site. In deed. Stackpole v, Curtis, 32 Me. 383. 

site lawfully in use. In statute, Elting Woolen Co. v. Wil- 
liams, 36 Conn. 310. 

steam saw . In insurance policy, Bigler v. New York, etc, 

Ins. Co., 20 Barb. 635. 

In deed. Auburn Congregational Soc. v. Walker, 124 Mass. 71. 

In statute, Sprague v. Town of Lisbon, 30 Conn. 18. 

or TnannftictorieB of any kind. In insurance policy, Franklin 

Fire Ins. Co. v. Brock, 57 Pa. St. 74. 

Westmoreland's Coal Co. 's Appeal, 85 Pa. St. 344. 

produce of a . In statute, Bowes v, Ld. Ravensworth, 1 5 C. 

B. 522. 

In statute, Henry v, Lowe, 73 Mo. 99. 

land. In statute. Stroud v. Missouri, etc., R. Co., 4 Dill. 396. 

produote. In statute, Thompson v. Noble, 3 Pittsb. 201. 

all or magnesia of any kind. In will, Gibson v, Tyscn. 5 

Watts, 34. 
In deed. Bell v, Wilson, L. R., i Ch. App. 303. 
mines and . In deed, Hartwell v, Camman, 10 N. J. (Eq.) 128. 

mines and within and under the land. In statute. Mid- 
land R Co. V, Checkley. L. R., 4 Eq. Cas. 19. 

and mining claims. In statute. Gold Hill v, Caledonia Mining 

Co., 5 Sawyer, 575 ; Mount Diablo Mill Co. v, Callison, 5 Sawyer, 

439. 
of day. In statute. King v, Brettell, 3 B. & Adol. 424. 

or mining elaims. In statute, Forbes v, Gracey, 4 Otto, 762. 



In constitution, Schumacker v. Reel, 61 Mo. 592. 

In statute, Gridley v, Clark, 2 Pick. 403 ; Baldwin v, MoClinch, i Me. 



MINISTER. 2Z\ MISNOMER. 

— Continued. 

I02 ; Washburn v. Fourth Parish, i Mass. 32 ; Kendall v, Kingston, 
5 Mass. 524; Barnes v. First Parish, 6 Mass. 401 ; Turner v. Second 
Precinct, 7 Mass. 60; Lowell v. Inhabitants, 7 Mass. 230. 

Ibr the time being. In statute. Pender z/. Barr, 4 El. & BL 1 14. 

of any ohuroh or ohapeL In statute Queen v. Mayor, 8 Ad. & 

El. 182. 

of religion. In statute. Ex parte Cain, 39 Ala* 440. 



ordained and stated . Legonia v. Buxton, 2 Greenl. 102 (i i 

Am. Dec. 46). 

regular of a diasenting oongregation. In statute. Queen v 

Oldham, L. R., 4 Q. B. 291. 

regular of the gospel. In statute. State v. Bray, 13 Ired. 290. 

stated and ordained of the gospel. In statute. Com. v. 

Spooner, i Pick. 235. 

jflXEflBTEBIAL. act. State v. Doyle, 40 Wis. 175; Pennington v. Theight, 54 

Ind. 376. 

offioer. Tracy v. Swartout, 10 Peters, 80; Dig^s v. State, 49 Ala. 

317. 

TRY. settled in the work of the . In statute. Goshen v. Stonington, 

4 Conn. 209. 

ohild. In statute. Richardson v. Fredentze, 35 Mo. 266. 



MINUTE. or memorandum of an agreement. In statute. Blackwell v. 

McNaughton, i Q. B. 128; Lucas v. Beach, i Man. & G. 417. 

MISAPPIJCATION. In statute. Reg. v. Priest, 16 Q. B. 44. 

JMISAPPLY. In statute. Carpenter v. Mason, 12 Ad. & El. 630. 

MT8RKR AVIOB. In statute. Queen v. Owen, 1 5 Q. B. 476. 

gross . In statute. Doherty v. Education Board, 4 New Zealand 

Jur. (N. S.) 78. 

gross and wickedness. In statute. Stevens v. Stevens, 8 R. L 

556. 

JOBCABBIAaS. In indictment. Smith v, SUte, 33 Me. 48. 

debt, default or . In statute. Kirkham v. Marten, 2 B. & Aid. 

617. 

JOBOONDnCfr. in statute. Stage v. Stevens, i Denio, 267. 

and misbehavior. In statute. Turnbull v. Martin,'37 How. Pr. 

20. 

in offloe. In statute. State v. Leach, 60 Mo. 58. 



IKIIJ:-! 



■ iCIIllrIM 



FED. himself in his offloe. In statute. Wildes v. Russel, L. R., i 

C. P. 723. 

rOB. King V. Powell, 2 B. & Ad. 78 ; Pillsbury v. Brown, 47 Cal. 477. 

In statute. State v. Mann, 21 Wis. 685 ; Rex v. Powell, 2 B. & Ad. 75 ; 
Campbell v. Queen, 11 Q. B. 812. 

in his professional oapaoity. In statute. Re Bowman, 7 Mo. 



(App.) 568 ; 8 Cent L. J. 250. 

Coite V, Lynes, 33 Conn. 109 ; Wright v. Spencer, i Stew. 576 ; 
Tracy v. Warren, 104 Mass. 376. 

MIBTi'BAT). designed to the voter. In statute. Turner t/. Drake, 71 Mo. 287. 

In statute. Queen v. Plenty, 9 B. & S. 391 ; Meredith v, Hinsdale, 2 
Caines, 362. 



MISPLEADING. 



MONEY. 



MISPIiEADin'G. Lovett v. Pell, 22 Wend. 369. 

MI8FBISION. In statute, Reg. v, Conyers, 8 Q. R 988. 

MISBEPAESENTATION. Tidmarsh v. Washington Fire, etc., Ins. Co., 4 Mason, 

439; Livingston t'. Maryland Ins. Co., 7 Cranch, 506; Hubbard v. 
Coolidge, 2 Gall. 353 ; Blydenburgh v, Welsh, Baldw. 331 ; Hodg- 
son V. Marine Ins. Co., 5 Cranch, 100 ; Wise v. Fuller, 29 N. J. (Eq.) 
257 : Daniels v, Hudson River R. Co., 12 Cush. 425. 

MZBBBPBESEjrrATIONS. In statute. White v, Ins. Co., 4 Dill. 184. 

what they earn. In statute. State v, Ransall, 41 Conn. 433. 

In statute. Sleeper v, Ins. Co., 56 N. H. 401 ; Chamberlain v, Ins. Cc 
55 N. H. 249. 

accident or miafortune. In statute. Grout v. Cole, 57 N. H. 547, 

or accident. In statute, U. S . «/. Eighty-five Hogsheads^ x 



MIBTAEE. 



lOTZG-ATB. 
MinQATING>. 

MITTDCnS. 






MOB. 
MOBS. 

MOCSEING. 

MOD. 

MODE. 



MODES. 



MOIaBST. 



MOITET. 



Paine, 54. 

or InadTertenoe. In statute. Doe v, Phillips, i Q. B. 94. 

In statute, Jungbluth v, Redlield, 4 Blatchf. 220. 

or aggravating ciroumatances. In statute. Porter z/. HannibaU 

etc., R. Co., 71 Mo. 66 ; Rains v, St. Louis, etc., R. Co., 71 Mo. 169. 

Connolly v. Anderson, 112 Mass. 62. 

action. Hall v. Decker, 48 Me. 255. 

materiala. In statute, Solomon v. Arthur, 12 Otto, 211. 

property. In will, Minot v, Thompson, 106 Mass. 583. 

war. People v, McLeod, i Hill, 377. 

In statute, Allegheny Co. v, Gibson, 90 Pa. St. 415. 

loos by flre occasioned by or riots. In statute, Harris v. York, 

etc., Ins. Co., 50 Pa. St. 341. 

In statute. State v, Warner, 34 Conn. 276. 

In will. Goblet v, Beechey, 3 Sim. 24 ; 2 Russ. & M. 624. 

of proceeding. In statute, Atty.-Gen. v, Sillem, 10 H. L. Cas. 704. 

agreeably to the usual of process against offenders in such 

State. In statute, U. S. v, Horton, 2 Dill. 97 ; U. S. v, Rundlett» 
2 Curt. C. C. 41. 

< of process. In statute, Wayman v. Southard, 10 Wheat, x ; 

Beers v, Houghton, 9 Pet. 329. 

forms and of proceeding. In statute, Schwabacker v, Rielly. 

2 Dill. 127 ; U. S. V, Knight, 14 Pet 301 ; Amis v. Smith, 16 Pet- 
303 ; Duncan v, Darst, i How. 301 ; Koning v. Bayard, 2 Paine, 259. 

my of the hoose. In will, Atkinson v, Fawcett, 3 C. B. 275. 

or disturb the plaintiff. In deed, Thomas v, Everard, 6 Hurl. 



& N. 540. 

— or interfbre with. In deed. Gibbons v. Vanillon, 8 C. R 484. 



Noble V, State, 59 Ala. 74; Paul v, Baul, 31 Tex. 10; Kennedy v, Briere» 
45 Tex. 305 ; Hobson v. Fountain, 5 Humph. 140 ; Anderson 9. 
Ewing, 3 Litt. 245 ; Pryor v. Com., 2 Dana, 298 ; Griswold v. Hep- 
bum, 2 Duv. 83 : Morris v, Edwards, i Ohio, 189 ; Edwards t/. Mor- 
ris, I Ohio, 524 ; Bradley v. Hunt, 5 Gill & J. 54 ; Morrill v, Bro^«rn» 
15 Pick. 173; Corbit v. Bank, 2 Harr. 235 ; McChord v. Ford, 3 T, 
B. Moc. 166 ; Scott v. Conover, 6 N. J. (L.) 222 ; Lange v. Kohne. i 
McCord, 115; Towson v. Havre de Grace Bank, 6 Harr. & J. 47, 

In indictment. Reg. v. Major, 2 East P. C. 118 ; Reg. v. Hill, Russ. & 



MONEY, 223 MONEYS. 

MOKEY — Continued . 

Ry. 190; Reg. v. West, 7 Cox C. C. 183 ; Reg. v, Godfrey, Dears. & 
B. 426; Colson V, State, 7 Blackf. 590; Williams v. State, 12 S. & 
M. 59 ; State v. Jim, 3 Murph. 3 ; Hale v. State, 8 Tex. 171 ; Com. v, 
Swenney, i Va. Cas. 146 ; Johnson v. State, 1 1 Ohio St. 324 ; Mc- 
Aulay V. State, 7 Yerg. 526 ; U. S. v. Wells, 2 Cranch C. C. 43 ; 
Block V. State, 44 Tex. 62 ; Walton v. State, 14 Tex. 381. 

In plea, Towson v, Havre de Grace Bank, 6 Harr. & J. 47 ; Foquet v, 
Hoadley, 3 Conn. 534 ; Waterman v. Waterman, 34 Mich. 490. 

In statute. Cumberland v, Kelly, 3 B. & Adol. 602 ; Frost v. Frost. 3 
R & Adol. 612 ; Deford v, Hewlett, 49 Md. 52 ; Lindsey v, Rolaken» 
32 Ark. 626 ; Beach v. Smith, 30 N. Y. 116. 

In will. Re Miller, 43 Cal. 170; Petty v, Wilson, L. R., 4 Ch. App. 
574 ; Jones v, Overstreet, 4 Mon. 549 ; Smith v, Davis, i Grant Cas- 
158 ; Blood V, Fairbanks, 48 Cal. 171. 

and securities. In wilL^ Graydon v, Graydon, 23 N. J. (Eq.) 229. 

and securities for . In will. Ogle v. Knipe, L. R., 8 Eq. 

Cas. 434. 

bills. Opinions of Justices, 126 Mass. 549. 

demand on contract. In statute. Brock v, Parker, 5 Ind. 538 ; 

Roberts v, Nodwith, 8 Ind. 339. 

due at my decease. In will. Bede v, Harrison, L.^R., 17 Eq. 76. 

due to the defendant. Skinner v, Moore, 2 Dev. & R (L.) 13^ 

(30 Am. Dec. 155). 

goods, wares or merchandise. In statute, Rext/. Hill, i Russ. 



& Ry. 190. 

-— I may die possessed ofL In will Byrom v, Brandreth, L. R., 
16 Eq. Cas. 475. 

— in the hands of a sheriff or other officer. In statute, Pruitt 



V, Armstrong, 56 Ala. 308. 

— jewelry, and other valuables. Welfordz^. Wisley, i Indian- 
apolis, 119. 

— jewels or ornaments. In statute, H3ratt v. Taylor, 42 N. Y. 
358 ; Ramaley v, Leland, 43 N. Y. 539. 

of the United States. In indictment. U. S. v. Watkins, 3 Cranch 



C. C. 441. 

answer the purposes of . In statute, Durrt/. State, $9 Ala. 29. 

game played for . In statute. Stone v. State, 3 Tex. (App.) 675. 

lawftil , Carpenter v. Atherton, 25 Cal. 564. 

lawftil current of FennsylTania. In band. Wharton v. Mor- 
ris, I Dall. 124. 

lawftil of the United States. Cocke v. Kendall, Hempst. 236. 

MOVS7XD* business or commercial corporation. In statute. Re Califor- 
nia Pacific R. Co., 3 Sawy. 246. 

corporation. In statute. Robinson v. Bank of Attica, 21 N. Y. 

406; Hill V. Reed, 16 Barb. 280; Bank Commrs. v. Bank of Buflfiailo^ 
6 Paige, 497. 

de m and. In statute. Mills v. Long, 58 Ala. 459- 

Mann v, Mann, 14 Johns, i ; i Johns. Ch. 231. 

In will. Williams v. Williams, 8 Ch. Div. 793; Beck v. McGilHs, 9 



MONEYS. 



224 



MORALITY. 



MONBYS— Continued. 

Barb. 3$; Fulkeron v. Chitty, 4 J6ne8 (Eq.), 244; Williams v. Wil- 
liams, 27 W. R. 100; Mann v, Mann, 14 Johns, i (7 Am. Dec. 416). 

in the house and out of it» In win. Collins v, Collins, L. R., 



ICOlVinON. 



12 Eq. Cas. 455. 
B.irtlett V. Kenwood, 2 EI. & HI. 788. 



MONOPOUES* perpetuittes and 



MONOPOLY. 



MONTH. 



MONTHS. 



MONUMENT. 
MOOBINGW. 
MOBAL. 
MORALITY. 



— . In constitution. City of Memphis v. Mem- 
phis Water Co., 5 Heisk. 49$. c 

Enfield Toll-Bridge Co. v. Hartford, etc., R. Co., 17 Conn. 42; Attor- 
ney-General V, Rumford Chemical Works, 9 Off. Gaz. Pat. 1062. 

Gross V, Fowler, 21 Cal. 392 ; Society v. Thompson^ 32 Cal. 347. 

In contract. Hunt v, Holden, 2 Mass. 170; Avery v. Pixley, 4 Mass. 
460 ; Leffingwell v. White, i Johns. Cas. 99 ; Thomas v. Shoemaker, 
6 W. & S. 179; Stackhouse v, Hasley, 3 Johns. Ch. 74; Sheets v. 
Selden, 2 Wall. 177; Loringz'. Hailing, 15 Johns. 119; Jackson v. 
Van Valkenburgh, 8 Cow. 260 ; Parsons v, Chamberlin, 4 Wend. 
5p ; People v. Mayor, 10 Wend. 393 ; Simpson v, Margiston, 11 Q. 
B. 32. 

In indictment, Ryalls v. Queen, 11 Q. B. 781. 

In statute, Ellis' Case, 3 Halst. 232 ; Brudenell v, Vaux, 2 Dall. 302 ; 
Brewer v, Harris, 5 Gratt. 285; Hunt v, Holden, 2 Mass. 170; 
Avery v. Pixley, 4 Mass. 460 ; Alston v, Alston, Treadw. (Const) 
606 ; Williamson v. Farrow, i Bailey, 61 1 ; Strong v, Birchard, 5 
Conn. 35.1 ; Sprague v, Mowray, 31 Cal. 173; Com. v, Chambre, 4 
Dall. 143 ; Pyle v, Maulding, 7 *J. J. Marsh. 202 ; Stiate v, Jacobs, 2 
Harr. (Del.) 548 ; Mitchel v, Woodson, 37 Mich. 567 ; Com. v. Short- 
bridge, 3 J. J. Marsh. 638; Parsons v. Chamberlain, 4 Wend. 512; 
Kimball v, Lamson, 2 Vt. 138; Loring v. Hailing, 15 Johns. 119; 
Churchill v. Merchants' Bk., 19 Pick. 532 ; Bartol v. Calvert, 21 
Ala. 42; Heaston v. Cincinnati, etc., R. Co., 16 Ind. 275; People 
V, Ulrich, 2 Abb. Pr. 28; Tillson v, Bowley, 8 Me. 163; Kelley v. 
Gilman, 29 N. H. 38$. 

one . In statute. State v, Upchurch, 72 N. C. 146. 

the first half of the . In contract, Grosvenor v. Magill, 37 111. 

239. 
In bond, 

539. 
In lease. 

In plea. 



Hardin v. Major, 4 Bibb, 104 ; Shapley v, (xarey, 6 S. & R. 



Regain v, Chanton, i Q. B. 249. 

Johnstone v. Huddleston, 4 B. & C. 933. 

In statute. Gross v. Fowler, 21 Cal. 392 ; State v, Jacobs, 2 Harr. 548 ; 
Glenn v. Smith, 17 Md. 260. 

credit of six ^ In order, Williamson v. Farrow, i Bailey (L.), 

61 1 (21 Am. Dec. 493; i Am. Dec. 99, note; 7 Am. Dec. 250^ note). 

In statute. Bank of Georgetown v, Forrest, 3 Cranch C 

. In plea. Marsh v, Higglns, 9 C. B. 554. 

— . In contract, Satterwhite 7/. Burwell, 6 Jones (L.), 92, 
Cox V, Friedley, 33 Pa. St. 124. 

changing her . In statute, Mcintosh v, Slade, 6 B. & C. 657. 

certainty. Com. v. Costley, 118 Mass. i. 

religion. and knowledge. In constitution. Board of Education 

V, Minor, 23 Ohio St. 211. 



C. 218. 
three — 



twelve 



MORE. 



225 



MORTGAGE, 



or 1688. In deed. Bayard v, Eddings, a Strobh. 374 ; Pedeo v. 



KOBBOVEB. 



Owens, Rice (Eq.), 55 ; Smith v. Fly, 24 Tex. 345 ; Duvals v. Ross» 
3 Mun£ 290 ; Pendleton v. Stewart, 5 Call, i ; Lobenstein v, U. S.. 
I Otto, 324; Geneust/. Hunt, 10 Kev. 139; McConnell v, Brayner. 
63 Mo. 461 ; Williamson v. Hall, 62 Mo. 405 ; Allison v. Allison, i 
Yerg. 16 ; Petit v. Shepherd, 32 N. Y. 97 ; Sullivan v. Ferguson, 
40 Mo. 79; U.S. V, D*Aguirre, i Wall. 311 ; Tarbell v. Bowman, 
103 Mass. 342 ; Dale v. Smith, i Del. Ch. i (12 Am. Dec. 64) ; Mc- 
Coun V, Delaney, 3 Bibb, 46 (6 Am. Dec. 635) ; Williams v. Lane, i 
Car, Law Repos. 266 (6 Am. Dec. 561); Thomas t^. Perry, Pet. C. C. 
49; Harrell t/. Hill, 19 Ark. 102; Pollock v, Wilson, 3 Dana, 25 ; 
Williford v, Bentley, 5 J. J. Marsh. 181 ; Fannin t/. Bellomy, 5 Bush, 
663 ; Gentry v, Hamilton, 3 Ired. (Eq.) 376 ; Shipp v. Swan, 2 Bibb, 
82; Poague V, Allen, 3 J. J. Marsh. 421 ; Smallwood v, Hatton, 4 
Md. Ch. 95 ; Hoffman v, Johnson, 2 Bland, 103 ; Tyson t^. Hardesty, 
29 Md. 305 ; Blaney v. Rice, 20 Pick. 62 ; Phipps v, Tarbley, 24 
Miss. 597; Couse v, Boyles, 4 N. J. (Eq.) 212 ; Morris Canal Co. v, 
Emmett, 9 Paige, 168 ; Brady v. Hennion, 8 Bosw. 528. 

In simple contract. Murdock v. Gilchrist, 52 N. Y. 242 ; King v. 
Brown, 54 Ind . 368 ; Belknap v. Sealey, 14 N. Y. 143 ; Fame v, 
Martin, 7 N. Y. 210; Thurber v, Ryan, 12 Kas. 453; Noble t^. 
Googins, 99 Mass. 231 ; Cross v. Eglin, 2 B. & Ad. 106 ; Tilden v. 
Rosenthal, 41 111. 386; Young v. Craig, 2 Bibb. 271 ; McCoun v. 
Delaney, 3 Bibb, 46 ; Caldwell v, Moore, 3 Dana, 340 ; Pingree v, 
Comm'rs, 102 Mass. 78 ; Blaney v. Rice, 20 Pick. 62 (32 Am. Dec. 
204) ; Ashcom v. Smith, 2 Penr. & Watts, 211 (21 Am. Dec. 437 ; 12 
Am. Dec. 64, note) ; Thomas v. Perry, Pet. C. C. 49 ; Brawley v. U. 
S., 6 Otto, 170; Brawley v, U. S., 11 Ct of CI. 522 ; Hardy v, U. S., 
9Ct of CI. 244; Cabot v. Winsor, i Allen, 546; Jollife v, Hite, i 
Call. 301 ; Hill v. Buckley, 17 Vesey, 394; Hunt v. Stull, 3 Md. Ch« 
24; Stebbins v, Eddy, 4 Mason, 414. 

In will. Bishop v, Meargan, 82 III. 351. 

than ozie satdeot* In constitution. Mills v. Charleton, 29 Wis. 

400. 

a little or leaa. In deed. U. S. v. Fossatt, 20 How. 413. 

not than. In contract, Klein v. Whedon, 3 Mo. (App.) 579: 

•Dcrmott v. Wallach, i Wall. 65. 

flree fix>m . In insurance policy. Lawrence v. Aberdein,'5 B. & 

Aid. no. 

Goddard v. Coe, 55 Me. 385 ; Gibson v. Warden, 14 Wall. 244; Hall v. 
Byrne, 2 111. 140; Ellington v. Charleston, 51 Ala. 166 ; Lord Canning 
V, Roper, i El. & Bl. 165; Harrold v. Whittaker, 11 Q. B. 159; 
Friedly v, Hamilton, 17 S. & R. 70(17 Am. Dec. 638) ; Walton v, Cody, 
I Wis. 420; Menrine v. White, 50 Ala. 388; Turner v. Kerr, 44 Mo. 
429; Nugent V. Riley, i Mete. 117 (35 Am. Dec. 355). 

In contract. Capron v, Attleborough Bank, 1 1 Gray, 498. 

In deed, Mervine v. White, 50 Ala. 388. 

In power of attorney. Wilson v. Troup, 2 Cow. 195 (14 Am. Dec. 458). 

In statute. Payne v. Bensley, 8 Cal. 260 ; Edwards v, Sanders, 6 S. C. 
316; Lanahan v. Sears, 12 Otto, 319; Copland t/. Bartlett, 6 C. B. 26. 

debt or sum of money. In statute. Mortimore v. Com'rs, 2 H. 

& C. 839. 

assign and transfer. In deed. Gambril v. Doe, 8 Blackf. 140. 



29 



MORTGAGE. 



226 



MUNICIPAL 



KOBTGAGS ~ Continued. 

chattel . Carpenter v. Snelling, 97 Mass. 453 ; Scott v, Henry, 

13 Ark. 112 ; Rauch v. Oil Co., 8 W. Va. 36 ; Evans v. Darlington, 5 
Blackf. 330; Wright v, Ross, 36 Cal. 414 ; Jordan v. Turner, 3 Black! 

309- 

lien in the nature of a • In contract, McLanahan v. Reeside, 

9 Watts. 508 (36 Am. Dec. 136}. 

shall not the same. In statute, McMurray v, St Louis Oil 

Manfg Co., 33 Mo. 377- 
WOiB^SQtAOiSD. In deed. Barrochelet v, Batelle, 7 Cal. 452; De Leon v. Htgura, 15 

Cal. 406. 

MOBTG-AGSE. in good Ikdth. In statute, Bronner v, Loomis, 17 Hun, 439. 

MOBTGAGE8. or aeoorities for money. In will, Rippen v. Priest, 13 C R 

(N. S.) 309. 

chattel . In statute, Parshall v, Eggert, 54 N. Y. 18 ; Hoyle v, 

R. Co., 54 N. Y. 314. 

MOBTX7ABY. In statute. Ayrton v. Abbott, 14 Q. B. i. 

publio plaoes. In statute, Sanehering v. Iron Ridge, etc., R. 



MOST. 
MOTION* 



MOUirFAIN. 



MOVABLE. 



Co., 25 Wis. 448. 
People V, Ah Sam, 41 Cal. 645 ; re Jetter, jZ N. Y. 601 ; Jenkins v, 
Frank, 27 Cal. 399. 

for a new triaL In statute, Springfield v, Worcester, 2 Cush. 

60. 

In deed, Waterpark v. Fennel], 7 H. L. Cas. 650. 

In plea. Lord Kildare v, Fisher, i Strange, 71 ; Cottingham v. King, 
I Burr. 629. 

goods and ohattela. In will Sparke v, Denne, i Wm. Jones, 

225. 



MOVABLES. 



MUCH 
MULATTO. 



property. In will. Strong 2/. White, 19 Conn. 238; Enohin v. 

Wylie, 10 H. L. Cas. i ; Wood v, George, 6 Dana, 343 ; Whitehurst 
V, Harker, 2 Ired. (Eq.) 292. 

every . In will, # Jackson v, Vanderspreigle, 2 Dall. 142. 

in-door . In will, Penni man v. French, 17 Pick. 404. 

In indictment. Rex v, Coppard, 3 C. & P. 59; i M. & M. 118. 

In plea, Gatty v. Field, 9 Q. B. 430. 

Rex V, Coppard, 3 C. & P. 59; i M^. & M. 118. 

Corporation of Washington v, Pratt, 8 Wheat. 681. 

State V, Scott, i Bailey, 270 : State v, Hayes, i Bailey, 275 ; State v. 
Davis, 2 Bailey, 558 ;Thurman v. State, 18 Ala. 276; Inhabitants of 
Med way v. Inhabitants of Natick. 7 Mass. 88 ; Johnson v. Boon, i 
Speers, 268 ; Dean v. Com., 4Gratt. 541 ; Daniel v, Guy, 19 Ark. 121; 
Pike V, Witt, 104 Mass. 597. 

MULTIFABIOnSNESS. Gaines v. Chew, 2 How. 619 ; McGlothlin v, Heniery, 44 Mo. 

350. 
MULTITUDE. Pike v, Witt, 104 Mass. 595. 

Horton v. Mobile School Com*rs, 43 Ala. 598. 

dainis. In statute, Philadelphia v, Scott, 72 Pa. St. 92 ; City 

V, Vanderveer, i Leg. Gaz. 397. 

corporation. Holland t/. San Francisco, 7 Cal. 361; Payne v. 



MUNICIPAL. 



Treadwell, 16 Cal. 220; Williamsportz^. Com., 84 Pa. St. 487. 



MUNICIPAL. 



22*J 



MY. 



VTJlSflCIPAIi — Continued. 

In cotistitution. Ex parte Railroad Co., 45 Ala. 696. 

oourts. Uridias v, Morrill. 22 Cal. 473. 

In constitution. State v, McArthur, 13 Wis. 386. 

purposes. In constitution, St. Louis v. Shields, 62 Mo. 276 ; 

State V, Leffingwell. 54 Mo. 458. 

In statute, Horton v, Com'rs, 43 Ala. 598. 

of war. In statute, U. S. v, Sheldon, 2 Wheat 1 19. 



HUNITIONS. 
JCITfiBSB. 



MUSICAL. 
KTJSTBB. 
HUBTJfiHED. 
JCUTUAL. 



Perry v. State, 43 Ala. 21; Temple v. State, 40 Ala. 350; State v. 
Phelps, 24 La. Ann. 493 ; McAdams v. State, 25 Ark. 405 ; Bradley z/. 
State, 31 Ind. 492 ; Alford v. State, 33 Ga. 303 ; Patmore v. State, 29 
Ark. 248 ; Smith v. State, 49 Ga. 482 ; State v, Morphy, 33 Iowa, 270; 
ex parte Taylor, 5 Cow. 39 ; People v, Enoch, 13 Wend. 159; State 
V, Jones, 64 Mo. 391 'people v. Kirby, 2 Park. C. C. 28 ; Com. v, 
Macloon, loi Mass. i ; Weller v. People, 30 Mich. 16. 

In instructions, McPherson v. State, 29 Ark. 226 ; Patmore v. State, 29 
Ark. 249. 

In statute, U. S. v, Magill, i Wash, C. C. 463. 

In indictment, Cordell v. State, 22 Ind. i. 

oomposition. In statute, Russell v. Smith, 12 Q. B. 217. 

Tyler v, Pomeroy. 28 Allen, 480. 

in. Tyler v, Pomeroy, 8 Allen, 480. 

Nichols V. Drayton, 34 Conn. 66. 

aooounts. In statute, Theobald v, Stinson, 38 Me. 149; Buntin 

V, Lagow, I Blackf. 373; Adams z/. Patterson, 35 Cal. 122; Fray lor 
V, Sonora, etc., Co., 17 Cal. 594, Weatherwax v. Consumers' Co., 17 CaL 
344; Dyer V. Walker, 51 Me. 104 ; McNeil v. Garland, 27 Ark. 343 ; 
Peck z/. Steam Co., 5 Bosw. 226; Knipc v, Knipe, 2 Blackf. 340; 
Prenatt v, Runyon, 12 Ind. 174. 

agreement. In statute. State v, Heiser, 60 Mo. 540. 

oombat. Tate v. State, 46 Ga. 148. 

consent. In statute. People v, Kearney, 43 Cal. 383. 

credit. In statute, Osgood v, DeGroot, 36 N. Y. 348 ; ex parte 

Deeze, i Atk. 228; Atkinson v, Elliott, 7 T. R. 378 ; Bliley v, John- 
son, L. R., 6 Ex. 279; Rose v, Sims, i B. & Ad. 523 ; Easum v, Cato. 
5 B. & Aid. 86k 

credits* In statute. Gray v, Rollo, 18 Wall. 629 ; Pardo v, Os- 



good, 5 Robt. 348 ; King v. King, 9 N, J. (Eq.) 44. 

— debt. In statute, Fustingz/. Sullivan, 51 Md. 495. 

— debts. In statute. Gray v, Rollo, 18 Wall. 629; Town of Wall- 
ingford v. Hall, 45 Conn. 353; Pate z/. Gray, i Hempst. 155. 

— demands. In statute. Gray v, Bennett 3 Mete. 522. 

— insurance oompany. Mygatt v, N. Y. Prot. Ins. Co., 21 N. Y. 



52 ; Union Ins. Co. v, Hoge, 21 How. 64. 

Botsford V, McLean, 45 Barb. 478. 



MUTUAUTY. Spear v. Orendorf, 26 Md. 37. 

arrival. In contract. Simonds v, Hodgson, 3 B. & Adol. 30. 

brother's son. In will. Doe v, Westlake, 4 B. A Aid. 59. 

chambers for which I gave 600 guineas; In will. Doe v. 

Parrott, 3 B. & Adol. 472. 



MV. 



NA VIGABLB. 



— Continued. 

Mtate. In wiii. Cook v, Cunliffe. 17 Q. B. 24$; Mumford's 

Estate, My rick Prob. 133. 

flshing place. In will Hart v. Hill, i Whart. 124. 

— house. In insurance policy, Mlm, Ins. Co. v, Tyler, 16 Wend. 
385 (30 Am. Dec, 90). 

nephew. In will. Grant v. Grant, L. R., 2 P. & D. 8. 

plantation* In will, Peyton v. Smith, 4 McCord, 476 (17 Am. 

Dec, 758). 

property. In will, Wildbore v, Gregory, L. R., 12 Eq. Gas. 

482 ; Jackson v, Howel, 17 Johns. 281. 

girla. In indictment. Com. v, Dejardin, 126 Mass. 46. 

Wilkerson v. State, 13 Mo. 91 ; Gordon v, Holliday, i Wash. C. C. 
28$ ; re Snook, 2 Hilt. 50^ 

In statute. Town of Hamden v. Town of Bethany, 43 Conn. 213. 

of the oauae. In statute, Sargent v, Gannon, 7 C. R 750. 

of the owner oaryed or engraved thereon. In statute, Morey 

V, Brown, 42 N. H. 373. 

oorporate • State v, Anderson, 7 Blackf. 222. 

in the of. In statute, Covell v. Hill. 6 N. Y. 374. 

in the of his master. In statute. Queen v, Cullen, L. R., 3 C. 

C. R. 29. 

of my and blood. In will, Leigh v, Leigh, 15 Ves. 92. 

•igned with the of. In statute. Queen v, Avery, 18 Q. B. 577. 

true . In statute. King v. Inhabitants, i B. & Ad. 196. 

without any aubacrlbed thereto or signed with a fiotitioiia 



NAMED. 



NAICES* 
NATIONAL. 

NATUBAL. 



name. In statute. Rex v, Heming, 2 East P. C. 11 16. 

not or provided fbr. In statute. Guitar v, Gordon, 17 Mo. 408 ; 

Bradley v. Bradley, 24 Mo. 311 ; Beck v, Metz, 25 Mo. 70; Hock- 
smith V. SI usher, 26 Mo. 237 ; Block v, Kelly, 3 Mo. 594. 

In statute. State v. Gates, 43 Conn. 533. 

ourrenoy of the United Statea. In indictment. Dull v. Com., 

25 Gratt. 965. 

heir. In statute. Barns v, Allen, 9 Am. L. Reg. 747. 

heirs. In will, Ludlum v, Otis, 15 Hun, 410; Miller v. 



Churchill, 78 N. C. 372. 



NATUHALIZED 
NATX7BB. 



herself be lawfully 
5 Fed. Rep. 11. 



In statute, Leonard v. Grant, 



NAVAL. 
NAVIQABLB. 



and oanseof tfaeaoonsation. In constituti&n, Norris v. State. 

33 Miss. 376. 

and material struoture of the buildings. In insurance foUcy, 

Bazendale v, Harvey, 4 Hurl. & N. 448. 

of the instroment. In statute, Crowther v, Wentworth, 6 R 

AC. 371. 
of the interest. In statute, Healey v. R. Co., 5 B. A S. 780. 

oases arising in the land or forces. In statute. Re Bogert, 

2 Sawyer, 407, 

Cates z/. Wadlington, i McCord, 580 (10 Am. Dec. 699); Att'y-Gcn. 
V, Woods, 108 Mass. 439; Com. v, Vincent, 108 Mass. 447. 



NA VIGABLE. 229 NEAR. 

BAVIOABUi — Continued. 

river. Com. v, Chapin, 5 Pick. 199 (16 Am. Dec. 386) ; ex parte 

Jennings, 6 Cow. 518 (16 Am. Dec. 447); Hooker v, Cummings, 20 
Johns. 90 (i I Am. Dec. 249) ; Spooner v, McConnell, i McLean, 
337 ; American River Water Co. v, Amsden, 6 Cal. 443 ; Wethen- 
field V, Humphrey, 20 Conn. 217 ; People v, Tibbetts, 19 N. Y. 523; 
Cobb V, Davenport, 32 N. J. (L.) 369; Veazie v, Dwinal, 50 Me., 
479 ; Wilson v. Forbes, 2 Dev. (L.) 30 ; Ingram v, Threadgill, 3 Dev. 
(L.) 59 ; People v. Canal Appraisers, 33 N. Y. 461 ; Carson v. Blazer, 
2 Binney, 475. 

— stream. Moore v, Sanborn, 2 Mich. 519; Brown v, Scofield, 8 
Barb. 239 ; Spring v, Russell, 7 Me. 273 ; Munson v, Hungerford, 6 
Barb. 26$; Wilson v, Forbes, 2 Dev. (L.) 30; Stuart v, Clark, 2 
Swan, 9; Neaderhouser v. State, 28 Ind. 2S7; Depew v. Board of 
Trustees, 5 Ind. 8 ; Rowe v. Granite Bridge Corp., 21 Pick. 344. 

— waters. The Montello, 20 Wall. 430; S. C, 11 Wall. 411 ; The 
Daniel Bell, 10 Wall. 557; Att'y-Gen. v. Woods, 108 Mass. 439; 
Com. V, Vincent. 108 Mass. 447 ; Woodman v, Kilbom Manfg. Co., 
I Biss. 546 ; Hickok v, Hine, 23 Ohio St. 523 ; Flanagan v. Phila- 
delphia, 42 Pa. St. 219; Charleston z/. Middlesex, 3 Mete. 202; Gro- 
ver V, Powell, 10 N. J. (£q.) 211 ; Mayor t/. Eslava, 9 Port. 577 (33 
Am. Dec 325). 

In statute, Scott v. The Young America, i Newb. 101 ; Tyler v. Peo- 
ple, 8 Mich. 320. 

not . In statute. Wood v. Hustis, 17 Wis. 416; Murdock v. Stick- 

ney, 8 Cush. 1 16. 

HAVTOATB. In statute. Reg. v. Edmonds, 4 El. & Bl. looi. 

HAVIOATED. fronu In statute, Brittain v. Cromford Co., 3 B. & Aid. 14a. 

HAVTOATZON. Wethersfield v. Humphrey. 20 Conn. 226. 

In constitution. Harrington v. Connecticut Lumber Co., 129 Mass. 580. 

In deed. King v. Aire Nav. Co., 9 B. & C. 829. 

In statute. Arkle v. Henzell, 8 El. & Bl. 829. 

In treaty. Brashear v. Mason, 6 How. 92. 

3rard. Ex parte Tatem, 1 Hughes, 588. 

exeat. Rhodes v. Cousins, 6 Rand. 71s (18 Am. Dec. 188). 

varietur. Fleckner v. Bank of the U. S., 8 Wheat. 338; Brab- 

ston V. Gibson, 9 How. 263. 

Barrett v. County Court, 44 Mo. 197 ; Boston, etc., R. Co. v. Mid- 
land R. Co., I Gray, 367 ; Kellogg v. Northampton, 4 Gray, 65. 

any dwelling-house. In statute. Lillis v. St L. K. C. & N. 

R« R., 64 Mo. 471. 

any election ground. In statute. Morris v. State, 3 Heisk. 315. 

St. Louis. In deed. Menklns v. Blumenthal, 27 Mo. 198. 

the river. In statute. Tyne Keelman v. Davison, 16 C. B. (N. 

S.) 616. 

the sea-shore. In patent. Keyser v. Coe, 9 Blatchf. 32. 

as as may be. In statute, Emma Silver Mining Co. v. Park, 14 

Blatchf. 414; Beardsley v, Littell, 14 Blatchf. 104. 

at or . In statute. Fall River Iron Works v. Old Colony R. Co., 

5 Allen, 221. 



NEAREST. 



230 



NECESSAR Y. 



HEAKLY. 
BTEAT. 



HXABEST. building. In insurance policy. Gates v, Madison Ins. Co.. s ^ 

Y. 469; S. C, 2 N. Y. 43. 

three towns. In statute. Reed v. Hanover R. Co., 105 Mass. 

305; Meacham v, Fitchburg R. Co., 4 Cush. 291. 

In deed. Johnson v, Pannel, 2 Wheat. 206. 

oattle. In statute. Hubotter v. State, 32 Tex. 479. 

stook or beevesu In indictment. Castello v. State, 36 Tex. 324. 

HEOESSABIES. Harris v. Lee. 1 P. Wms. 82 ; Hall v. Weir, i Allen, 261 ; Parke 1/. 

Kleeber, 37 Pa. St. 251 ; Oilman v. Andrews, 28 Vt. 241 ; Mayhew v. 
Tbey^r, 8 Gray, 172 ; Cunningham v. Reardon, 98 Mass. 538 ; Carley 
V. Green, 12 Allen, 104; Monson v. Williams, 6 Gray, 416; Wood v. 
O 'Kelly, 8 Cush. 406; Porter z/. Briggs, 38 Iowa, 166; Bradshaw zr. 
Beard, 12 C. B. (N. S.) 344; Hunt v. De Blauquiere, 5 Bing. 550; 
McAfee v. Robertson, 41 Tex. 355; Helps v. Clayton, 17 C. B. (N. 
S.) 553; Wilson V. Ford, L. R., 3 Ex. 66; Warner v. Ryan, 28 Wis. 
577 ; Cothran v. Lee, 24 Ala. 380; Sutter v. Mustin, 50 Ga. 242; St. 
John's Parish v. Bronson, 40 Conn. 75 : Montague v. Benedict, 3 R 
' ft C. 631 ; Grindell v. Godmond, 5 A. & £. 755 ; Stonei/. McNair, 7 
Taunt 432 ; Knox v. Bushell, 3 C B.|fN: S.) 334 ; Zeigler v. David, 
23 Ala. 127; Carter v. Howard, 39 Vt. 106; Hill v. Goodrich, 46 N. 
H. 41 ; Smith v. Ehivis, 45 N. H. s^\ Ray v. Adden, 50 N. H. 82 ; 
Johnson v. Williams, 3 Iowa, 97 ; Wray v. Wray, 33 Ala. 187 ; Mor- 
n^Vi Palmer, 39 N. H. 123; Cornelia v. Ellis, 11 111. 584; Harris ?/. 
Dale, 5 Bush, 61 ; Davis v. Caldwell, 12 Cush. 512 ; Breed v, JudcU i 
. Gmy. 455; Ford v. Teal^ 7 Bush, 156; Jordan v. Coffield, 70 N. C. 
no; Bergen v. Forsythe, 17 B. Monr. 556 ; Marshall v. Miller, 3 
Mete. 334 ; Pell v. Cole, 2 Mete. 253; Munson v. Washband, 31 Conn.. 
305 ; Assignee v. Connolly, 3 McCord, 6 (14 Am. Dec. 613) ; Burnard 
V. Haggis, 14 C. B. (N. S.) 45 ; Wharton v. Mackenzie, 5 Q. B. 606 ; 
Barker v. Hibbard, 54 N. H. ^39 ; Strong v. Foote, 42 Conn. 205^; 
Warner V. Hefder, 28 Wis-. 519; Rainwater v. Durham, 2 N. & McC. 524 
(10 Am. Dec. 637) ; Davis 7/. Caldwell, 12 Cush. 513; Bell v. Tuttle, i 
Allen, 219; Drake t/. Bailey, 5 Allen, 210; Plympton v. Roberts, 12 
Allen, 366. 

In bill of sale 0/ vessel. Burchard v. Tapscott, 3 Duer, 363; The Ply- 
mouth Rock, 7 Ben. 448. 

In statute. State v. Weatherwax, 1 2 Kans. 463 ; re Ludlow, i N. Y, 
Leg. Obs. 322 ; re Comstock, i N. Y. Leg. Obs. 326 ; re Hay, 2 Low. 
180; re Welch, 5 Ben. 230; The Riga, L. R., 3 Adm. & Ecc 516; 
Lee V. Campbell, 61 Ala. 1 2. 

AimishedShim [or his flunily. In statute. McAuley v. Tracy, 

61 Me. $23. 

expended. People v. Supervisors of N. Y., 32 N. Y. 473, 

incurred. In statute. Reg. v. Council, 8 Q. B. 928. 

property used in operating any ^railroad. In statute. Mil- 
waukee & C. R. Co. V. Supervisors, 29 Wis. 122. 

McCullock V. State, 4 Wheat. 316 ; Smart v. Morton, 5 El. & Bl. 30; 
Pettengill v. Porter, 8 Allen, i ; Sipperly v. Warner, 9 How. Pr. 332. 

In constitution. McCullogh v. Maryland, 4 Wheat. 318; Thayer 9. 
Hedges, 23 Ind. 141 ; Stu3rvesant v. Mayor, 7 Cow. 588. 

In statute. Com. z/, Morrison, 2 Marsh. 80 ; Griswold v. Hepburn. 
2 Duv. 26; State T'. Jersey City, 7 Vroom. 166; State v. Han- 
cock, 6 Vroom. 537 ; State v. Woodruff, 7 Vroom, 94 ; State v. Love. 



NECESSAR V. 231 NECESSAR Y. 

— Continued. 

8 Vroom, 60; Fenwick v. R. Co., L. R., 20 Eq. Cas. 544; Pearce v. 
Watts, L. R., 20 Eq. Cas. 493. 

alterations. In bond. Western Building Asso. v. Fitzmaurice, 

7 Mo. (App.) 293. 

and pxoper. In constitution, Hubbard v, Brainard, 35 Conn. 

563. 
and proper fbr carrying into ezeoution. In constitution, 

Hepburn v. Griswold, 8 Wall. 603. 
and usefiil for public or private purposefu In statute. Hays 

V, Briggs, 3 Pitts. 504. 

apparatus. In contract. Patterson v, Ganet, 7 J. J. Marsh. 113. 

charges. In statute. Stetson v, Kempton, 13 Mass. 272(7 Am. 

Dec. 145) ; Minot v. West Rozbury, 112 Mass. i ; Busseyz^. Gilmore, 
3 Me. 191. 

— ^ disbursements. De Witt v. Swift, 3 How. Pr. 280 ; Wolf v. Mc- 
Gavock, 24 Wis. 54; Carter v, Montgomery, 2 Tenn. (Ch.) 455. 

fbod. In statute. Hall v. Penny, 11 Wend. 44; Farrell v, 

Higley, Hill & Denio, 87. 

Ibod for all the stock. In statute. Cowan v, Muir, 24 Wis. 

569 ; King v, Moore, 10 Mich. 538. 

for the accommodation of the officers and crew. In charter^ 

party, Almgren v, Dutilh, 5 N. Y. 28. 

fbr the construction or operation thereof. In railroad mort^ 



gage, Burch v, Seymour, 46 Conn. 156. 

— fbr the^drainage of the lands. In statute, Updike v, Wright, 81 
111. 49. 

— for upholding lifb. In statute, Leavitt v, Metcalf, 2 Vt. 342 



(19 Am. Dec. 718); Garrett v, Patchen, 29 Vt. 248; Montague v, 
Richardson, 24 Conn. 338 ; Dunlop v, Edgerton, 30 Vt. 224 ; Croker 
V, Spencer, 2 D. Chip. 68 ; Hart v, Hyde, 5 Vt. 328. 

— help. In statute. State v, Hobart, 13 Nev. 419. 

— household fbmiture. In statute, Hitchcock v. Holmes, 43 
Conn. 528. 

— implication. Wilkinson v, Adam, i Ves. & B. 466. 

— imprOTements. In order. Reed y/. Jones, 8 Wis. 421. 

— injury. In statute. Porter v, Hannibal, etc., R. Co., 71 Mo. (i^\ 



Rains v, St. Louis, etc., R. Co., 71 Mo. 169. 

— or couTenient. In statute, Abson v, Fenton, i B. & C. 203. 

— or usuaL In deed, Morris v, Rhydydeped Colliery Co., 3 Hurl. 
& N. 888. 

— outgoings. In statute. Re Cowley, L. R., i Ex. 289 ; re Elwes, 



3 Hurl. A N. 725. 

— proTisions. In statute. Mulligan v, Newton, 16 Gray, 211. 

— repairs. Webster v, Seekamp, 4 B. & Aid. 353. 

— team. In statute. Wheeler v, Cropsey, 5 How. Pr. 288; East- 
man V, Croswell, 8 How. Pr. 75. 

— tools of a tradesman. In statute, McDowell v, Shotwell, 2 
Whart 26. 

— to the use and ei^yment thereof. In statute. People v, King« 
man, 24 N. Y. 559. 



NECESSAR Y. 



232 



NEGLECT. 



— Continued. 

TAlidity. Jones v. Walker, 2 Paine, 688. 

Tegetablee aotnally provided for llimily ubo. In statvie. 

Carpenter v. Uerrington, 25 Wend. 370 (37 Am. Dec. 239). 

aotB Ibr the prosperity of the society. In carpartUim articles. 

Tracy v, Gnthrie County, etc., Soc., 47 la. 27. 

hands Ibr the prosecution of the improrements. In statute. 

Jerome v, Ross, 7 Johns. Ch. 315. 

household ftimiture Ibr supporting lifli. In statuU, Monta- 
gue V, Richardson, 24 Conn . 339. 

household ftimiture Ibr the debtor and his ftmily. In 

statute. Davlin v. Stone, 4 Cush. 359. 

if . In order. Pretty v. Nauscaven, L. R., 9 Ex. 43. 

oaths in the perfbrmanoe of their duties. In statute. Wheat 

V. Ragsdale, 27 Ind. 191. 

property for schools, religious and ohacitattie purposes. 

In constitution, N. W. Univ. v. People, 80 111. 333. 

such books as may be . In statute. Brown v. Hoffmeister, 71 

Mo. 413. 

The Herald, 8 Ben. 409. 

In statute. Todd v, Flannoy, 56 Ala. 99 ; Gladwin v, Lewis, 6 Conn. 
49 (16 Am. Dec. i) ; Thompson v. Tillotson, 56 Miss. 36. 

or mercy. In statute, Phillips v, Innes. 4 CI. & Fin. 234. 

other great . Spring Valley Water Works v. City, 52 Cal. 1 11. 

works of . In statute, Morris t/. State, 31 Ind. 189, Flaggv. 

Millbury, 4 Cush. 243; Augusta v, R. Co., 55 Ga. 126; State z^. 
Stone, 15 Mo. 514. 

works of and charity. In statute. Smith v. Wilcox, 24 N. Y. 

353; McGrath v. Merwin, 112 Mass. 467 (17 Am. Rep. 119); Johnson 
V, Irasburgh, 47 Vt 29 (19 Am. Rep. 11 1) ; Queen v, Cleworth, 4 B. 
& S. 927. 

of CTery description. In will, Atty.-Gen. t^. Harley, 5 Rass. 



iraOBSSITY. 



KEED. 



NSBDFUI.. 

KEEDI1BS8. 

NSEDLESSLY. 



2$6. 

In will. Conant v, Stratton, 107 Mass. 474. 

be delivered. In statute. Fromant v, Ashley, i El. & HI. 724. 

most in . In will. Bull v. Bull, 8 Conn. 47 (20 Am. Dec. 86). 

do the . Dawson v, Lawley, 4 Esp. 65. 

In statute. State v. Bogardus, 4 Mo. (App.) 217. 
. kill any living creature. In statute. State v, Bogardus, 4 



KEQATIVE. 
NXaiaECT. 



Mo. (App.) 217. 

— easement. Trustees v. Lynch, 70 N. Y. 447. 



Kimball v, Rowland, 6 Gray, 224 ; Catch pole v. R. Co., i El. & HI. iii. 

In bill of lading, Guillaume v. Packet Co., 42 N. Y. 140. 

In indictment. Queen v. Ryland, L. R., i C. C. R. 102. 

In statute. Inhabitants of New Marlborough v. County Com'rs, 9 Mete. 
432; Kingz/. Burrell, 12 Ad. & Ell. 400; Wells v. Kane, 2 Grant's 
Cas. 63. 

defitult or misfeasance. In statute. Coite v. Lynes, 33 Conn. 

109. 



NEGLECT, 233 NEMO. 

— Continued. 

, or reAue. Merrifield v. Cobleigh, 4 Cush. 178 ; Kimball v. Row- 
land, 6 Gray, 224. 

to act. In statute. Willoughby v, Willoughby, 9 Q. B. 923. 

to depooit. In statute, Rosenplaenter v, Roessle, 54 N. Y. 262 ; 



Bendetson v, French, 46 N. Y. 266. 

— to make oomplaint. In statute. Watson v. Hall, 46 Conn. 205. 



willAil . In statute, Washburn v, Washburn, 9 Cal. 475. 

OTOUQENOE. Union Pacific R. Co. v. Young, 19 Kans. 488; Jameson v. R. Co., 

55 Cal. 593; Edelman v. St. Louis Trans. Co., 3 Mo. (App.) 507; 
Flournoy v, Jeflfersonville, 17 Ind. 169; Shehan v. Cornwall, 29 
Iowa, 99; Lexington v. Lewis, 10 Bush, 677; Bizzell v, Booker, 16 
Ark. 308 ; The Nitroglycerine Case, 15 Wall. 524; O'Brien v. R. Co., 
3 Phila. 76 ; McGrath v. Hudson River R. Co., 32 Barb. 144 ; Grant 
V. Moseley, 29 Ala. 302 ; Sherman v. Western Trans. Co., 62 Barb. 
150; Union Pacific R.Co. v. Collins, 5 Kans. 167; Gove v. Farmers', 
etc., Ins. Co., 48 N. H. 41. 

In insurance policy, Sawtelle v. Railway Pass. Ass. Co., 15 Blatchf. 

216. 
or otherwiM. In railroad ticket. Wells v. N. Y. Cent R R., 

24 N. Y. 180 ; Perkins v, N. Y. Cent. R. R., 24 N. Y. 196. 

gross . Phillips v, Clark, 5 C. B. (N. S.) 882. 

In insurance policy, Lycoming Ins. Co. v, Barringer, 73 111. 230. 

Blight . Griflin v. Willow, 43 Wis. 509. 

Walker v. Ocean Bank, 19 Ind. 247. 

In note, Belding v, Thompson, 3 Cranch C. C. 698. 

In statute, Austin v. Blue, 6 Mo. 265 ; Beatty v, Anderson, 5 Mo. 448; 
Odell V, Funk, 15 Mo. 338. 

paper. Vermyle v. Adams Express Co.. 21 Wall. 138; Bank of 

Mobile V, Brown, 42 Ala. 108. * 

at the bank. In note, Muir v, Jenkins. 2 Cranch C. C. 18. 

at the Bank of Washington. In note, Belding v, Thornton, 3 

Cranch C. C. 698. 

instroment. In stdtute, Taylor v, Kymer, 3 B. & Adol. 320. 

Ycrkes v. Bank, 69 N. Y. 382 ; Griffin v, Weatherby, 9 B. & S. 726; 
Palmer v. Ferry, 6 Gray, 420 ; Blakiston v. Dudley, 5 Duer, 373. 

for. In lease. Smith v, Coc, 55 N. Y. 678. 

irSGOTIATIN'a. In statute. First Nat. Bank v. Pierson, 24 Minn. 140(31 Am. Rep. 

341). 
ISnSQQFnAnOTX. Walker v. Ocean Bank, 19 Ind. 247. 

irSGK)nATION'S. In contract, Havemeyer v. Havemeyer, 45 N. Y. (S. C.) 464. 

enter into . In statute, Mahoney v. Supervisors, 53 Cal. 384. 

State V, Chavers, 5 Jones, 11 ; Felix v. State, 18 Ala. 720; McPherson 
V, Com., 28 Gratt. 939. 

free mulatto or free person of oolor. In statute. State v, 

Dempsey, 9 I red. (L.) 384. 

Esterly v. Cole, 3 N. Y. 502. 

In statute. Woods v, Cochrane, 38 Iowa, 484. 

^nSlCO. allegone snam tnrpitudinem est andiendus/ Walton v. 

Shelly, I T. R. 296; Winton v, Saidler, 3 Johns. Cas. 185 ; Baker t^. 
Arnold, i Caines, 258 ; Gould v, Gould, 3 Story, 516. 

30 



NEPHEW, 



234 



NEWSPAPER. 



NSPHEW. 



HET. 



KXVEB. 
NEW. 



mews. 



In will. Grant v. Grant, L. R., 5 C. P. 380; Cromer v. Pickney, 3 
Barb. (Ch.) 466; Green's Appeal, 42 Pa. St. 25 ; Browersz^. Browers, 
I Abb. App. Dec. 214; Sherratt v. Mountford, L. R., 1$ Eq. Cas. 308; 
L. R., 8 Ch. App. 929; Wells v. Wells, L. R.. 18 Eq. Cas. 504; re 
Blower, 6 Ch. App. 351. 

In will, Sherratt v, Mountford, L R., 15 Eq. Cas. 305 , Wells v. Wells^ 
L. R., 18 Eq. Cas. 504 \ Green's Appeal, 42 Pa. St. 25. 

Best V, Osborne, Ry. & M. 290. 

In statute, St.' John v, Erie Co., 22 Wall. 137. 

balance. Evans v. Wain, 71 Pa. St. 69. 

earnings. In contract, St. John v, Erie R. Co., 10 Blatchf. 271 ; 

22 Wall. 146. 

In statute, Jones Manfg Co. v, Cora., 69 Pa. St. 137 ; Union Pacific R. 
Co. V, U, S., 9 Otto, 402. 

inoome. In statute. Opinion of Judges, 5 Mete. 598 ; Jones, etc* 

Manfg Co. v. Com., 69 Pa. St. 137 ; Andrews v. Boyd, 5 Me. 199. 

profits. Stewart v, Stebbins, 30 Miss. 66; Wallace v, Beebe» 12 



Allen, 354. 

' In agreement. Fuller v. Miller, 10$ Mass. 115; Tutt z'. Land, 50 Ga. 

339. 
In statute, Repton v, Hodgson. 7 Q. B. 84. 

prooeeds. In contract, Dan lap v, O'Dena, i Rich. (Eq.) 272. 

rent. In order. King v, Tomlinson. 9 B. & C. 166. 

Talue. In corporation charter, Babcock v, Middlesex Savings 

Bank, 28 Conn. 302. 

In plea, Stockbridge ^. Sussams, 3 Q. B 239. 

In statute. Glue Co. v, Upton, 7 Otto, 3. 

and original design. In statute, Harrison v, Taylor, 3 Hurl. Sl 

N. 300 ; 4 Hurl. & N. 820. 

aaaets. In statute, Robinson v, Hodge, 117 Mass. 223. 

building. In statute, Hobbs v, Dana, L. R., 9 C. P. 30 ; Shiel 



V. Mayor, 6 Hurl. & N. 804; Brice's Appeal, 89 Pa. St. 85. 

— oaoe. Moore v, Alvis, 54 Ala. 356. 

— mannftkotnre. In statute, Ralston v. Smith, 19 C. B. (N. S.) 
819 ; II H. L. Cas. 223. 

— mannflictures. In statute. Heath v. Smith, 3 El. & Bl. 256. 

— pariah. In statute, Crenshaw v, Wigan Bd., L. R., 8 Q. B. 217. 

— partiea. In rules of court, Ladner v, Ogden, 31 Miss. 332. 

— pound. In statute, Bosworth v, Trowbridge, 45 Conn. 161. 

— street. In statute, Att'y-Gen. v, Bd. of Works, 6 Ch . Div. 539L 

— trial. Zaleski v, Clark, 45 Conn. 400; Springfield v, Worcester. 



2 Cush. 61. 
offioial • 



In insurance policy. Fowler v, Ins. Co., 18 C. B. (N. 



S.) 818. 

NEWSFAFEB. In deed of trust, Graham v. King, 50 Mo. 22 ; Stevenson v, Jannaiy, 

49 Mo. 465. 

In statute, Kerrz^. Hitt, 75 111. 51 ; Beecher t/. Stevens, 25 Minn. 146 ; 
Hernandez v, Drake, 81 III. 34, Benkendorf v, Vincenz, 52 Mo. 
441 ; Kellogg V, Carrico, 47 Mo. 157 ; Card v. Lackland, 49 Mo. 451. 



NEWSPAPER. 235 NIGHT. 



— Continued. 

printed in the oonnty. In statute, Walton v, Harris, 73. 

Mo. 491. 

reports. In statute. State v. Brown, 71 Mo. 458. 

Cambridge . In statute. Tibbits v, Yorke, $ B. & Ad. 605. 

nJBULT. Humphries v. Cullingwood, 2 R & Aid. 642 ; Whitney v. Crosby, 3. 

Caines, 89. 

before. In statute. Clayton v. Corby. 2 Q. B. 814. 

befbre some suit or action. In statute. Parker v. Mitchell 1 1 

A. & E. 788 ; Lowe v. Carpenter, 6 Ex. 825 ; Glover v. Coleman,. 
L, R., 10 C. P. 108. 

oonrt. In statute. Green v. McLaren,- 7 Ga. 107 ; Durell v^ 

Merrell, \ Mass. 411. 

— — devisee. In statute. Den v, Robinson, 2 South. 689. 

election. In statute. People v, Mott, 3 Cal. 506. 

of kin. In statute, Hillhouse v, Chester, 3 Day, 166(3 Am. 

Dec. 265) ; R. Co. v. Shannon, 43 III. 338 ; White v, Springett, L. R., 

4 Ch. App. 302; McCool V. Smith, i Black, 459; Rogers v. Weller, 

5 Biss. 166; Green z/. Hudson River R. Co., 32 Barb. 25; Mer- 
chants' Ins. Co. V. Hinman, 34 Barb. 410; Peterson z/. Webb, 4 
Ircd. (Eq.) 56. 

Inwill. Keteltast/. Keteltas, 72N. Y. 312 (28 Am. Rep. 155); Murdock 
V. Ward, 67 N. Y. 387; Luce v. Dunham, 69 N. Y. 36; Halton v. 
Foster, L. R., 3Ch. App. 505; Harden z/. Larrabee, 113 Mass. 430; 
Snow z/.Teed, L. R., 9 Eq. Cas. 622 ; Re Je£frey, L. R., 14 Eq. Cas. 
136; re Standley, L. R., 5 Eq. Cas. 303; Simmons z/. Gooding, 5 Ired. 
(Eq.) 382 ; Redmond v. Burroughs, 63 N. C. 242 ; Sweezey v. Willes,. 
I Bradf. 495; Clayton z^. Drake, 17 Ohio St. 367; Slosson v. Lynch, 
28 How. Pr. 417 ; 43 Barb. 147 ; Hamlin v, Osgood, 5 N. Y. 
Y. (Surr.) 409 ; Steel v, Kurtz, 28 Ohio, 192 ; Edwards v. Bucks^ 
dale, 2 Hill (Ch.), 416; Murdock z;. War^l, (yj N. Y. 387 ; Luce v. 
Dunham, 69 N. Y. 36. 

personal representative. In will. Stockdale v. Nicholson, L. 

R., 4 Eq. Cas. 359. 

-— ^regiilar session. In constitution. People v, Lippincott, 64 
111. 256. 

sessions. In statute. King v. Heath, 5 Ad. & Ell. 347. 

surviving son. In will. Eastwood v. Lockwood, L. R., 3 Eq. 

Cas. 487. 

term* In statute. Wood v, Messerly, 46 Mo. 255; Wilkie v. 



Jones, I Morris (la.), 97 ; Moodiev. Vandyke, 4 Yeates, 512 ; French 
V, Barnard, 9 Cush. 403 ; Smith v. Cutler, 10 Wend, 589 (25 Am. 
Dec. 580); Durell v. Merrill, i Mass. 411. 

flrst day of August . In statute. Couch v, Ulster, etc., Tp. Co.,. 

4 Johns. Ch. 26. 

President v. Norwood, Bush. (Eq.) 65. 

In will. Re Blower, L. R., 6 Ch. App. 351 ; Sherratt v. Mountford, L. 
R., 8 Ch. App. 929. 

Inwill, Sherratt v, Mountford, L. R., 15 Eq. Cas. 305 ; Wells v. Wells» 
L. R.) 18 Eq. Cas. 504. 

NIQHT. State z/. Morris, 47 Conn. 179; Tutton v. Drake, 5 Hurl. & N. 648; 

Nixon z/* Freeman, 5 Hurl. & N. 653. 



NIGHT. 236 NOT. 

KIGHT' — Continued. 

— time. Rex v. Tandy, i C. & P. 297 ; Com. v. Chevalier, 7 Dane 
Abr. 134; People v. Griffin, 19 CaL 578; Thomas v. State, 5 How. 
(Miss.) 20: State v, Bancroft, 10 N. H. 107 ; Trull v, Wilson, 9 Mass. 
1 54 ; Rex V, Kemp, i Leach, 222 ; Rex v. Polly, i C. & P. 77 : 
Com. V. Williams, 2 Cush. 582 ; Lewis v. State, 16 C'Onn. 32. 

by . In statute, Cureton?/. Queen, i B. & S. 218. 

lilQ>HT& In insurance policy. Glendale Woolen Co. v. Protection Ins. Co., 

21 Conn. 18. 

KIQHT-WAIjKBB. In statute. Thomas v. State, 55 Ala. 260. 

NO. oonsiderable proTOoation appearing. In indictment, Butler 

V. State, 34 Ark. 48a 

— order. In writ, Meredith v. Gittens, 18 Q. B. 257. 

other. In statute. Pope v, Tearle, L. R., 9 C. P. 500. 

tenant. In statute. Com. v, Watson, 97 Mass. 565. 

H0I80MB. or offonaiTe buaineas. In deed, Hickman v. Isaacs, i R & S. 

976. 

HOIf. proa. Com. t/. Casey, 12 Alien, 218. 

HOlCnrAL. damages. Beaumont v, Greathead, 2 D. & L. 635. 

party. Wing v, Andrews, 59 Me. 505. 

NOlCnrATBI). In statute. Edward v. Buchanan, 3 B. & Adol. 792. 

HON. oompoa mentis. Re Carmichael, 36 Ala. 514 ; re Baker, 2 Johns. 

Ch. 232 ; Jackson v. King, 4 Cow. 207. 

In constitution, Beaumont's case, i Whart. ^1 (29 Am. Dec. 31). 

est inventus. In writ, Magnay v. Monger, 4 Q. B. 818. 

pros. Com. v, Casey, 12 Allen, 218. 

dies juridious. State v, Ricketts, 74 N. C. 187. 

NOK-ABBIVAL. In charter-party. Soames v. Lonergan, 2 B. ft C. s^S- 

y ON- ASHHtfW A RTiK. In stock certificate. Upton v, Treblecock, x Otto, 45. 

KON-FOBF JUTUV Qt, In insurance policy. Chase v. Phoenix Life Ins. Co., 67 Me. 85. 

HONPABEIL. type. Insurance Co. v. Slaughter, 12 Wall 404. 

KON-BBSIDENT. In statute Clark t^. Ward, 12 Gratt 440; Mayor v. Genet, 4 

Hun, 487 ; Curd v, Letcher, 3 J. J. Marsh. 445 ; Ballinger v. Lantier, 
15 Kas. 608 ; Slavens v, R. Co., 51 Mo. 308. 

lands. In statute. People v. Barker, 48 N. Y. 70. 

of the State. In statute. Wolf v. McGavock, 23 Wis. 517. 

HOK43AKS. Den v. Vancleve, 5 N. J. (L.) 589. 

KOBTHWABB. In deed, Jackson v. Reeves, 3 Caines, 298. 

KOBTBSEtLY. In deed. Irwin v, Towne. 42 Cal. 329; Garvin z^. Dean, 11$ Mass. 

yJ^ : Howard v. College of the Holy Cross, 116 Mass. 117 ; Brandt 
V. Ogden, i Johns. 156. 

NOBTHLY. Indeed. Brandt ?/. Ogden, i Johns. 156. 

NOBTH W ABDLY. In deed. Seaman v, Hogeboom, 21 Barb. 398 ; Craig v. Hawkins. 

I Bibb, 53. 

KOBTH-WESTEBLY. In deed. Irwin v. Towne, 42 Cal. 329. 

KOT. able to work. In statute. Re Morten, 5 Q. B. 591. 

befbre. In statute. Leverin v, Leicester, 12 Q. B. 949- 

exoeeding. In statute. Dearborn v. Inhabitants, 97 Mass. 469. 



NOT 



237 



NOTICE. 



NOT — Continued. 

ezeoeding eighty aoreB. In constitution. David v. David, s^ 

Ala. 51. 

ixurarecL In bill of lading. Peek v. North Staffordshire, etc., 

R. Co.. 10 H. L. Cas. 473. 

known or naed before his application. Pennock v. Dialogue, 



HOTABY. 
HOTB. 



HOTSD. 



2 Pet I (I Robb. Pat. Cas. 542). 

— more than. In statute, Britton v. Com., x Cush. 305. 

— public. Kirksey v. Bates, 7 Port. 529 (31 Am. Dec. 722). 



In statute, Gaines v. Craig, 24 Ark. 477 ; Force v, Elizabeth, 12 C. E. 
Green, 408. 

or memorandnm. In statute, Dailey v. Sweeting, 9 C. B. 

(N. S.) 858 ; Bailey v. Ogden, 3 Johns. 399 (3 Am. Dec. 509). 

AindB Ibr the payment of the . In promissory note. Keystone 

Bridge Co. v, Britton, 17 Blatchf. 409. 

ite oontente. Wildes v. Fessenden, 4 Mete. 12. 

In indictment. Dubois v. State, 50 Ala. 1 39. 

In statute, Hamersley v, Franey, 39 Conn. 177. 

and re£»renoes. In statute. Little v, Gould, 2 Blatchf. 165. 

for the purpose of paying claims. In charter. Wood v, 

Wellington. 30 N. Y. 218. 

in writing. In statute. Caples v. Brsinham, 20 Mo. 244 ; Mul- 

drowi/. Caldwell, 7 Mo. 563. 

of hand. In will. Hopkins z/. Holt, 9 Wis. 232 ; Perry v. Max- 



well, 2 Dev. (Eq.) 48S. 

or relbrenoes made by the State reporter. In statute. Little 

V, Gould, 2 Blatchf. 265 ; 2 Blatchf. 362. 
all aooommodation . In contract. Da Costa v, Guieu, 7 S. & 

R. 462. 

bank current in the city of Kew York. In contract, Judah 

V. Harris, 19 Johns. 146. 

bonds and prcmiissory fbr money or property. In statute, 

Draher v, Schreiber, 1 5 Mo. 603. 

in this act. In statute. Wright v. Norwich R. Co., 8 Blatchf. 2a. 

Lawrence v. Bowman, i McAll. 419; Pringle v. Phillips, s Sandf 
157. 

In statute. Will v. Town of Southbury, 43 Conn. 53 ; Van Metre v. 
Mitchell, 2 Wall. Jr. 317; Pearson v. .Lovejoy, 53 Barb. 407 ; Ruthen 
V. Acker, 18 Barb. 393; Bolton v. Lundy, 6 Mo. 46 ; Lee v. Bow- 
man, 55 Mo. 400; St. Louis V. Goebel, 32 Mo. 295 ; Fry v, Bennett, 
7 Abb. Pr. 352 ; Vicksburg, etc., R. Co. v. McCutcheon, 52 Miss. 645. 

of action. In statute. Lewis v. Smith, Holt N. P. 27. 

of any prior act of bankruptcy. In statute, Biid v, Bass, 6 

Man. & G. 146; Edwards v, Gabriel, 7 Hurl. & N. 520. 

of sale. In statute. Knowles v. City of Boston, 129 Mass. S5i- 

to quit. In statute. Oakes v. Moore, 8 Cush. 287. 

actual . Jordan v. Pollock, 14 Ga. 145 ; Curtis t/. Mundy, 3 Mete. 

407. 
In statute, Beatle v. Butler, 2X Mo. 313; Masterton v. West End R. 

Co.. 5 Mo. (App.) 71. 



NOTIFIED. 



238 



OATS. 



TfOFTIFrSD. 
ISfOTING. 
.HOTOBIETT. 
irOTOBIOUB. 



Converse v. Hartley, 31 Conn. 380. 

In notice of diskimor, Armstrong' i;. Christiana, 5 C. B. 692. 

Leary v, Walton, 5 Mon. 370. 

Leary v. Walton, 5 Mon. 370. 

In indictment, Grisham v. State, 2 Yerg. 588. 

Stout. Raggett v, Findlater. L. R., 17 Eq.Cas. 29. 



NOVELTY 
NOW. 



HOUBIBHINQ. — 

NOVATION. Hobson v. Davidson's Syndic, 8 Mart. 422 (13 Am. Dec 296, im//); 

Adams v. Power, 48 Miss. 451. 

McCormick v, Seymour, 3 Blatchf. 209. 

In statute, Clark v. Lord, 20 Kans. 390 ; Savings Bank v. New Lon- 
don, 20 Conn. 1 16. 
In will, Quinn v, Hardinbrook, 54 N. Y. 83. 

happened. In treaty, Hylton v. Brown, i Wash. C. C. 353. 

in the port of Amsterdam. In charter-party, Behn v. Bur- 
gess, I B. & S. 880 : 3 B. & S. 752. 

oooupied by me. In will, Hutchinson v. Barrow, 6 Hurl. & 



NOXXOUB. 



NUISANGE. 



N. 583. 

— possess. In will, WagsUf! v, Wagstaff, L. R., 8 Eq. Cas. 229. 

or dangerous trade or business. In deed, Atlantic Dock 

Co. V, Leavitt, 54 N. Y. 35. 

— or offonsive business, trade or manufttotnre. In statvU. 
Bd. of Health v. Hill, 13 C. B. (N. S.) 481. 

other substanoe or liquid. In statute. People v. Van Deleer, 

53 Cal. 147. 

Grady v, Wolsner, 46 Ala. 381 ; Ferguson v, Selma,'' 43 Ala. 39S ; 
Parker v. Union Woolen Co., 42 Conn. 399; Mayor v, Radecke, 49 
Md. 217 ; Miller v, Burch, 32 Tex. 208 ; State v. Mayor, 5 Port. 279; 
Hinchman v, Patterson, etc., R. Co., 17 N. J. (Eq.) 75 ; Whitney y. 
Bartholomew, 21 Conn. 213. 

In deed, Harrison v. Good, L. R., 1 1 Eq. Cas. 338. 

In statute. Great Western R. Co. v. Bishop, L. R,, 7 Q. B. 551 ; 
Browne/. Bussell, L. R., 3 Q. B. 251. 

material . Queen v, Russell, 3 El. & Bl. 942. 



KUISANCES. 



JNUMO. 



In statute. Brown v, Bussell, 9 B. & S. 2. 

and void. In statute. Pearse v, Morrice, 2 Ad. & El. 95. 

and denomination. In indictment, Duvall v. State. 63 Ala. 17. 

pro tunc. Ludlow v, Johnson, 3 Ohio, 553 (17 Am. Dec. 609). 

ITOKCXTPATIVE. wiU. Re Hebden. 20 N. J. (Eq.) 473 ; Sykes v. Sykes, 2 

Stew. (Ala.) 364 (20 Am. Dec 44, note). 

Reg. V, Clarke, 7 El. & Bl. 192. 

Omichund v. Barker, i Atk. 42 ; Arnold v. Town of Middleton, 41 
Conn. 206; King v. White, i Leach C. C. 482; Brock v. Milligan, 
10 Ohio, 123; Blocker 2/. Burness, 2 Ala. 354; Clinton z/. State, 33 
Ohio St. 27 ; Oaks v, Rodgers, 48 Cal. 197. 

or other competent proo£ In statute. Noble v, Holliday, i 



NUBTUBE. 
OATH. 



N. Y. 330. 
corporal — 
solemn — - 



In indictment, Jackson v. State, i Ind. 184. 
In indictment, Jackson v. State, i Ind. 184. 



OATS. 



— or other lawflQ merohandise. In contract, Southampton Ca 
V. Clarke, L. R., 4 Ex. 73 ; L. R., 5 Ex. 53. 



OBEY. 239 OCCUPANCY. 

OBEY*. and perlbnn the orders of the oourt. In contract, Claflin v. 

Ball, 43 N. Y. 481. 

OBJECT. of the action. In statute, Scarborough v. Smith. 18 Kans. 399. 

or reftise. In deuise. Doe v. Crisp, 8 Ad. & £11. 779. 

. OBJECTION'. In statute. Elf rank v: Seller, 54 Mo. 135. 

OBJECTTS. articles or charged with an internal tax. In statute. Wells 

V, Shook, 8 Blatchf. 257. 

OBLATIONS. In statute, Ayrton v, Abbott, 14 Q. B. i. 

OBUGATIOK. Crandall v, Bryan, 15 How. Pr. 48. 

In statute, Fogg v. State, 9 Yerg. 392 ; Strong v, Wheaton, 38 Barb. 
616. 

for the payment of money only. In statute, Flanagan v, 

Watkins, 1 B. & C. 318. 

or written contract. In statute. Gale v. Myers, 4 Houst 546. 

OBUGATIOKS. bonds or other . In statute. Smith v, Ellington, 14 Ga. 379 ; 

Rippon V, Townsend, i Bay. 445; Hargroves v, Cooke, 15 Ga. 321. 

notes and . In statute. Basehore v, Rhodes, 85 Pa. St. 44. 

OBLiaATOBY. writing :. InpUa, Clark v, Phillips, Hempst 294. 

OBUaEE. In statute. Hall v, Byrne, 2 111. 140. 

OBSCENE. writing. In statute, U. S. v, Williams, 3 Fed. Rep. 484. 

OBSOUBTE. In will, Lewis v, Lewis, 2 W. & S. 455. 

OBSTBUCfT. any engine. In statute. Queen v, Hadfield, L. R, i C. C. R. 

253 ; Queen v. Hardy, L. R., i C. C. R. 278. 

— new lights. Tapling v. Jones, 11 H. L. Cas. 290. 

or retard the passage of the mail. In statute, U. S. v, Kirby, 

7 Wall. 482 ; U. S. V, De Mott, 3 Fed. Rep. 483. 

OBSTBUCfnON. Nashville, etc., R. Co. v, Carroll, 6 Heisk. 347 ; Mosher v. Vincent, 

39 Iowa. 607 . 

In statute, Hodgson v. Little, 14 C. B. (N. S.) 120; 16 C. B. (N. S.) 
207 ; Snyder v, Philadelphia, 78 Pa. St. 23. 

OBSTaUCnOE'S. in statute, Patterson v. Vail, 43 Iowa, 142 ; Ray v, Manchester, 

46 N. H. 59. 

OBTAIN. In statute, Spilsberry v, Clough, 2 Q. B. 466 ; Queen v, Kilham, L. R., 

I C. C. R. 261. 

OBTAixwinG-. In agreement, Russell v, Ledsam, 14 M. & W. 587. 

and recovering payment. In statute, Reg. v, Com'rs, L. R., 

4 H. L. 450. 

OBTAINS. firom another. In statute, Sandy v. State, 60 Ala. 60. 

OBVENnONS. In statute. Ayrton v, Abbott, 14 Q. B. i. 

OCCASION. as shall require. In power, Attwood v, Munnings, 7 R & C. 

284. 

OCCASIONED. In statute, Meysenburg v, Schlieper, 48 Mo. 426. 

by camphene. In insurance policy. Harper v. New York City 

Ins. Co., 22 N. Y. 441. 

by payment or pledge of the property of the husband. In 



statute, Vogt v. Ticknor, 48 N. H. 249. 

OCCUPANCY. Dallas City v. Missionary Soc, 6 Fed. Rep. 356 ; Redfield v, Utica, 

etc., R. Co., 25 Barb. 54. * 



r 



OCCUPANCY. 



240 



OCCUP Y. 



OOCU^JUXOY •— Continued. 

In statute. Walters v. People, 21 111. 178 ; Brinkerhoff v, Everett, 38 
III. 263 ; Com. V, Weatherhead, no Mass. 175. 

aotual . In statute. Hunt v. Smith, 9 Kans. 137. 

in the aotual of any i>er8on. In statute. Smith v. Sanger, 4 



N. Y. 577. 
ready for — 



— . In building contract, Cunningham v, Washburn, 1 19 
Mass. 224« 

OCCUPANT. In city ordinance, Bixler v, Hagan, 42 Mo. 367. 

In statute, Shelby v, Houston, 38 Cal. 410 ; Hammel v, Zobelein, 51 
Cal. 532; O'Neale v, Cleveland, 3 Nev. 485; Hussey v. Smith, i 
Utah Terr. 129; Ford v, Kennedy, i Oregon, 136, Carpenters. 
Vail, 36 Mich. 226; Lechler t/. Chapin, 12 Nev. 65. 

OCCUPATION. Johnson v. State, 44 Ala. 415. 

In statute. Re Haynes, 49 L. J. (N. S.) Bank. 62 ; Mourelyan v. Labal* 
mondierc, i El. & El. 533 ; Luckett z/. Bright, 2 C. B. 195 ; People z'. 
Ambrecht, 1 1 Abb. Pr, 97 ; Lawrence v, Fulton, 19 Cal. 683 ; Stock- 
well V, Brewer, 59 Me, 287; Mersey Docks v. Cameron, 11 H. L. Cas. 



OCCUPIED. 



then in his . In will, Newton v, Taylor, 7 B. & C. 385. 

OCCUPATIONS, profeaaionsy trades and . In statute. Commits v, Reynolds, 

7 W. & S. 329. 

In insurance policy, Lockwood v, Middlesex Ins. Co., 47 Conn. 554; 
Townsend v. North-western Ins. Co., 18 N. Y. 168. 

In statute, McConnaughey z'. Baxter, 55 Ala. 380; Robinson z^. Brigii^s, 
L R., 6 Ex. i; Trinity Church v, Boston, 118 Mass. 164; New 
England Hospital t/. City of Boston, 113 Mass. 518; Weisbrod v, 
Daenicke, 36 Wis. 73; King v. Inhabitants, 5 B. & Adol. 227; 9 
B. & C. 183. 

as a private dwelling. In policy of insurance, O'Neil v, Buf- 
falo Fire Ins. Co., 3 N. Y. 122. 

as a reaidenoe. In statute. Potts v, Davenport, 79 111. 4S$. 

aa a atore-honae. In policy of insurance. Wall v. East River 



OCCUPIEB. 



OCCUPY. 



Mut. Ins. Co., 7 N. Y. 370. 

or naed fbr nnlawftil purposes. In policy of insurance, Kelly 

V, Ins. Co., 97 Mass. 284 

owned or . In statute, Hershell v, Bushnell, 37 Conn. 38. 

premises by him. In writ, Jones v, Fletcher, 41 Me. 254 

In statute, Jones v, Mersey Docks, 20 C. B. (N. S.) 130; King z^. 
Inhabitants, 4 B. & C. 960 ; Sheppard v, Bradford, 16 C. R (N. S.) 
378; Cook V, Montagu, L. R., 7 Q. B. 418 ; King v, Sutton, 3 Ad. 
& El. 611. 

of tithes. Chanter v, Glubb, 9 B. & C. 483. 

of land. In statute. King v. Burton Gras Co., 5 B. & C. 466. 

now . In contract, Magee v, Lovell, L. R., 9 C. P. 107. 

In contract. Morrow v, Brady, 12 R. I. 130. 

In statute. King v. Inhabitants, i R & Aid. 476 ; Gough v. Evererd, 3 
H. & C. 10; Locke v, Rowell, 47 N. H. 46; Abbott v, Upham, 13 
Mete. 172 ; Walters V People, 18 111. 199; S. C, 21 111. 178; Wolfs- 
kill V, Malgawich, 39 Cal. 276 ; Queen v. West Riding, 2 Q. B. 507. 

any stand. In city ordinance. Com. v. Rice, 9 Mete 253. 



occur y. 



24Z 



OFFICE. 



OOCUB. 



OCCUPY— Continued. 

the milL In statute. Abbott v, Upbam, 13 Mete. 172. 

-^ the ahore. In deed. Lacy v. Green, 84 Pa. St. 514. 

In insurance policy, Jobnson t/. Humboldt Ins. Co., 91 III. 92 ; Hay 
V, Star Fire Ins. Co., 77 N. Y. 235 ; Major v. Hamilton Fire Ins. Co., 
39 N. Y. 46. 

Olaixn shall . Chandler t/. St. Paul, etc., Ins. Co., 21 Minn. 85. 

western . In patent, Keyser v, Coe, 9 Blatchf. 32. 

ten . Taylor v, Wilkinson, 22 Wis. 40. 



bCfiAJS'. 

O'CLOCK. 

OF. 



OFF. 
OFFENDEB. 

OnPENDlKGI-. 



U. S. V, Hatch, I Paine, 336. 

In contract. Powell v, Horton, 2 Bing. N. C. 668. 

In deed, Hannum v, Kingsley, 107 Mass. 355 ; Pine v, Rickert, 21 

Barb. 469. 

In plea. Porter v. Miller, 3 Wend. 329. 

In statute, Williams v. Burgess, 12 Ad. & Ell. 635 , Darwin v, Lin- 
coln, 5 B. & Aid. 450. 

and oonoeming. In plea. May v. Brown, 3 B. & C. 129 ; King 

V, Marsden, 4 M. & S. 169. 

the parish of M. In order. Queen v, Toke, 8 Ad. & Ell. 



233 ; Queen v, Flockton, 2 Q. B. 536. 

heard . In statute. Fellows v. Fellows, 8 N. H. 160. 

heirs the body. In deed. Den v, Gillat, 2 Term Rep. 431. 

In affidavit, Randle v. Long, 6 Ad. & Ell. 225. 

member Congress. In statute. Butter v. Hopper, i Wash. 

C. C. 500. 

its lines. In railway ticket, Kent v. R. Co., L. R., 10 Q. B. i. 

In statute. People v. Park, 41 N. Y. 21 ; Lee v, Simpson, 3 C. B. 880; 
Eggington's Case, i El. & BI. 734. 

person so ,In statute. U. S. v, 141 2 Gallons of Spirits, 10 

Blatchf. 430. 

In constitution, Randall v. Brigham, 7 Wall. 523. 

In statute. State v, Jager, 19 Wis. 235 ; Canfield v, Mitchell, 43 Conn. 
172; Frost's Case, 127 Mass. 550; Sellwood v. Mount, i Q. B. 726; 
Queen v, Sutcliffe, 13Q. B. 833. 

of the same character. In statute, Crockett v. State, 38 Ala. 

387. 



arms of weapons. In statute, Cosan'sCase, i Russ. Cr. 119; 

Rex V, Pahner, i Moody & R. 70 ; Rex v. Fry, 2 Moody & R. 42 ; 

Rex V, Johnson, Russ. & Ry. 492 ; Rex v, Noakes, 5 C. & P. 326 ; 

Rex V. Grice, 7 C. & P. 803. 
trade or business to the neighboring inhabitants. In deed, 

Barrow V. Richard, 8 Paige Ch. 351 (35 Am. Dec. 713). 
In statute, Simpson v. Yard, L. R., 4 Q. B. 626. 

to sell. In statute, Williams v, Tappan, 3 Fost (N. H.) 385. 

In statute, Ayrton v, Abbott, 14 Q. B. i. 

to TOte. In statute. Case v. Miller, 5 Wright (Pa.), 403. 



OFFICE. 



In constitution. People v, Nostrand, 46 N. Y.375 ; State v, Wilson, 
{Employ men f). 29 Ohio St. 347. 

In statute. State v. Weeks, 67 Mo. 60 ; Shelby v. Acorn, 36 Miss. 289 , 
Queen v. Manning, L. R., i C. C. R. 340; Faulkner v. Upper Bod- 
31 



OFFICE, 242 OFFICER. 

OFFICE — Continued. 

dington, 3 C. B. (N. S.) 412 ; People v. Ridgely, 21 111. 68 ; Heartley 
V, Banks, S C. B. (N. S.) 40; Queen v. Local Bd., L. R., 9 Q. B. 148 ; 
Iron Ship Co. v. Blunt, L. R.. 3 C. P. 484; U. S. v. Hartwell, 6 Wall. 
385 ; Dailey v. State, 8 Blackf. 329 ; Leach v. Cassidy, 23 Ind. 449 ; 
Waldo z'. Wallace, 12 Ind. 569; People v, Stratton, 28 Cal. 382; re 
Hathaway, 71 N. Y. 238; Smith v. Mayor, 37 N. Y. 5^18; Richardson 
V, Brooklyn ,etc., R. Co., 22 How. Pr. 368 ; People v, Pinckey, 52 
N. Y. 377 ; People v, Conover, 17 N. Y. 64 ; Queen v. Mayor, 11 Ad. 
& Ell. 13; Loundes v, Stamford, 18 Q. B. 426. 

of honor. In constitution. Dickson z;. People, 17 111. 191. 

of profit. In constitution. People v. Whitman, 10 Cal. 38 ; Doty 

V. State, 6 Blackf. 529. 

In statute. King v. Mayor, 6 Ad. & Ell. 347. 

of profit and trust. Ellis v. State, 19 Ind. 351. 

of tniBt. Re Corliss, 11 R. I. 638. 

of trust or profit. In constitution. Doty v. State, 6 Black£ 529. 

or plaoe of profit. In statute. Delane v. Hillcoat, 9 B. & C. 31 o. 

or publlo trust. In constitution. Re Oaths, 20 Johns. 493 ; 

People V. Nichols, 52 N. Y. 478; Leigh's Case, i Munf. 483; re 
Dorsey, 7 Port. 293 ; re Wood, i Hopk. 6 ; Waters v. Wittemore, 22 
Barb. 595 ; Seymour v. Ellison, 2 Cow. 29. 

place or employment. In statute. Queen v. Chanettie, 13 Q. 



B.447. 

any or capacity. In statute. U. S. v. Morse, 3 Story, 87. 

dvll . fn constitution. State v. Valle, 41 Mo. 29; State 'Z/. Wil- 
mington City Council, 3 Harr. 294 ; Crawford v. Dunbar, 52 Cal. 36. 

judicial . Waldo v. Wallace, 12 Ind. 569. 

lucrative . In constitution. Kerr z/. Jones, 19 Ind. 351; People 

V. Whitman, 10 Cal. 38; Crawford v. Dunbar, 52 Cal. 36. 

ministerial . Waldo v. Wallace, 12 Ind. 569. 

political . Waldo z/. Wallace, 12 Ind. 569. 

public . In statute. People v. Common Council, 77 N. Y. 503; 

People V. Hayes, 7 How. Pr. 248; People v. Bedell, 2 Hill, 196. 

public <>-T^Tmn.1 . In statute. King v. Inhabitants, 5 B. & Ad. 573. 

(Place.) In statute. Com. v. White, 6 Cush. 181 ; Shaw v. Morley, L. R., 3 Ex. 

137 ; State v. Scripture, 42 N. H. 489. 

of busiaess. In statute. Blandy v. De Burgh, 6 C. B. 624. 

for the weighing of any merchandise. In constitution. Tink- 



ham V. Tapscott, 17 N. Y. 141. 
at an or banking-house. In statute. Merchants' Bank v. State 

Bank, 10 Wall. 604. 
principal . In statute. Western Trans. Co. v. Scheid, 18 N. Y. 

408. 
OFFICER. King v. Dr. Bumell, Carth. 478 ; U S.v. Maurice, 2 Brock. 103; Shelby 

V. Acorn, 36 Miss. 289 ; People v. Pinckney, 32 N. Y. 377 ; Roosevelt 

V, Draper, 23 N. Y. 318; Olmstead v. Mayor, 42 N. Y. (S. C.) 481 ; 

Cordiell v. Frizell, i Nev. 130. 

In constitution. Bunn v. People, 45 111. 397 ; Brown v. Turner, 70 N. 
C. 93 ; re Stuart, 53 Cal. 745. 



OFFICER. 243 OFFICERS. 

— Continued. 

In statute. State v. Brooks, 42 Tex. 62 ; Com. v. Wyman, 8 Mete. 247 ; 
Pedley v, Davis, 10 C. B. (N. S.) 512 ; Pierce v. Inhabitants of Cam- 
bridge, 2 Cush. 613; Kavanaugh v. State, 41 Ala. 399; Myers v. 
Veitch, L. R., 4 Q. B. 649 ; U. S. v. Benner, Baldw. 234; Twenty per 
cent Cases, 20 Wall. 179; U. S. v. Saunders, 20 Wall. 492 ; Talbot 
V, U. S., 10 Ct. of CI. 426; Vaughn v. English, 8 Cal. 39; 
Conrey v. Copeland, 4 La. Ann. 307 ; People v. Middleton, 28 Cal. 
603 ; State v, Piatt, 4 Harr. 154 ; State v, Putnam, 35 Iowa, 561 ; State 
t/. Montgomery, 25 La. Ann. 138; Hummel's Case, 9 Watts, 416; 
Com. V, Tucker, 10 Gray, 173; Second Manhattan Building Asso. v, 
Hayes, 2 Keyes, 192; Com. v. Christian, 9 Phila. 556; Union Co. v. 
James, 21 Pa. St. 525 ; Com. v, Neely, 3 Pittsb. 527 ; Woodworth v. 
State, 26 Ohio St. 196; re Hunt, 3 Dill. 44» note; Queen v, Guardians, 
I Q. B. 130; Queen v. Justices, 2 Q. B. 433 ; Bank v, Patton, 4 J. J. 
Marsh. 192. 

of court. In statute. Bailey v. Williams. 6 Oregon, 71 ; White 

V, State, 44 Ala. 409; Caldwell v, Gwinn, 54 Ala. 66. 

of eleotion. In statute, U. S. v, Cla3rton, 2 Dill. 219; U. S. v, 

Fisher, 8 Fed. Rep. 414. 

of the reyenue. In statute, Campbell v, Jones, 3 Fed. Rep. 513. 

who made the sale. In statute. Livingston v. Arnouz, 56 N. 



w hM; 



Y. 507. 

civil . In statute. Queen v. Earl Waldegrave, 2 Q. B. 341. 

mft-Tntgi-ng . jn statute, McAllister v, Penn. Ins. Co., 28 Mo. 214. 

ministerial . In statute, Diggs v. State, 49 Ala. 311. 

other . In statute. Com. v. Wyman, 8 Mete. 247 ; re Whiting, 

Edm. Sel. Cas. 498 ; State v, Moore, 39 Conn. 244. 

public . In constitution. Board of Supervisors v, Hackett, 21 

Wis. 613. 

In statute, Mitchell v. Nelson, 49 Ala. 88 ; Morril v, Haynes, 2 N. H. 
246; Porter z'. Pillsbury, 11 How. Pr. 240; Butler v. Board of Re- 
gents, 32 Wis. 124.; Morse v. City of Lowell, 7 Mete. 152 ; People v. 
Supervisors, 50 How. Pr. 353 ; State v, Walton, 62 Me. 106 ; State v. 
Boody, 53 N. H. 610. 

State . State v, McKee, 69 Mo. 508. 

In statute. Queen v. Poor Law Com'rs, 9 Ad. & Ell. 911 ; Queen v. 
Hunt, 12 Ad. & Ell. 133 ; ex parte McCabe, 33 Ark. 397. 

judicial and ezeoutlTe. In statute. Wise v. Withers, 3 Cranch^ 

331. 
of cities. In statute, Kinnie v. City of Waverly, 42 Iowa, 487. 

of such body corporate. In statute, Madrid Bank v, Bayley, 



8 B. & S. 29. 

— of the State. In constitution. People v. Ashburner, 55 Cal. 517. 
of the United States. In statute, U. S. v, Tinkelpaugh, 3 



Blatchf. 425 ; U. S. v, Germaine, 9 Otto. 509 ; U. S. v, Hartwell, 6 
Wall. 385 ; ex parte Randolph, 2 Brock, 481 ; Piatt v. Beach, 2 Ben. 
303 ; Armstrongfz'. U. S., Gilp. 339; Lindsey v, Attorney-General, 33 
Miss. 508 ; State v. Bell, Phill. (L.) 76 ; Brown v, U. S., i Curt. C. C. 

civil . In constitution, U. S. v. Hatch, Burnett, 22. 

city . In constitution, Poople v, Batchelor, 22 N. Y. 128. 



OFFICERS. 



244 



OjN^. 



GFFICEBS — Continued 

eofunty •^-^% /n c&HsitttUioft. Sheboygan Co. v. Parker, 3 Wall. 93. 

Mate . Ih c&nsti^uiim. Ex parte Wiley, 54 Ala. 227. 

totm . In cmsiitutton. People v, McKintiey, 52 N. Y. 374. 



OFFSPBlNO. 

OHIO. 

OIIk 

OLD. 

oumaiT. 

OMISSIONS. 
OlOT. 

OMNIBXXS. 
OXNIS. 

OX. 



Powell V. Brandon, 24 Miss. 343. 

In deed, Madison 7/. Hildreth, 2 Ind. 274. 

essential •— ^. In statute. Murphy v, Arnson, 6 Otto, 131. 

fbundatieiui. In statute. Arthur v. Gumming, i Otto, 362. 

- — roads. In statute. People v, Griswold, 67 N. Y. 59. 

son. In wilL Gardner v. Guild, 106 Mass. 25. 

In contract. Shaver v, Murdock, 36 Gal. 293. 

"-> — to oommunioate. In insurance policy. Pirn v, Reid, 6 Man. 
& G. 25. 

In city ordinance, Snyder v. North Lawrence, 8 Kas. 82. 

ratihabitio retMtraliitiir et maadato aaqxiiparatur. Bird 

V. Brown, 4 EJt. 786; Wilson v. Tumman, 6 M. & G. 236. 

GaldweH'8 case, 19 Wall. ^4. 

In statute. Masters v. McHollaiid, 12 Kas. i7. 

a passage. In insurance policy, Washington Ins. Go. v. White, 

103 Mass. 239 <4 Am. Rep. 543). 

all or either. In insurance policy, Gom. v. Hide, 112 Mass. 136 

(17 Am. Rep. 72). 

•^^^^ AugvBt 1st or as soeft as the vendee shall pay $2,000. In 

contract, Felter v, Weybright, 8 Ohio, 167. 

— ^-^ behalf o£ In contract, Lewis v. Nicholson, 18 Q. B. 503. 

— — ^ board. In insurance policy, Robia^n v. Manufacturers' Ins. 
Go., I Mete. 146. 

oalL Bowman v, McGhesney, 22 Gratt. 609. 

— k-« oetnpkLint. Instmtnte. Gampbell v, Thompson, 16 Me. 117. 

condition. In contract. Meanor v, McKowan, 4 W. & S. 302. 

demand. Blackwell v, Fosters, i Mete. 88. 

duty. In insurance policy, Gibson v. Farmers' Ins. Go., i Gin. 
410. 

— eaoh entry. In statute, Ullman v. Murphy, 11 Blatchf. 358. 

— freight In contract. Cutwater v. Nelson, 20 Barb. 29 ; Dawson 
V, Kettle, 4 Hill, 107. 

— goods. McKenzie v, Whitworth, 24 W. R. 287. 

— lakes or rivera In bill of lading, St Louis, etc., R. Go. v. 
Smuck, 49 Ind. 302. 

memorandum. Wartman v. Breed, 117 Mass. 18. 

— notioe being given. In statute. Queen v, Arkwright, 12 Q. B. 
960. 

— or about his premises. In statute. Powell v. State, 63 Ala. 
177. 

<— erbefbre. In contract. Wall v. Sampson, 6 J. J. Marsh. 155 
(22 Am. Dec. 72); People v. Walker, 21 Barb. 630; Mattison v. 
Marks, 31 Mich. 421 (18 Am. Rep. 197). 

»— payment tf costs. Sands v. McGlelan, 6 Cow. 582 ; Dana v. 
Gill 5 J. J. Marsh. 243. 



y 



ON. 245 aNA 

OSi — Continued. 

-*— right daliyery of tSie oaigo. In cmiract. Paynter v, James, 
L. R., 2 C. P. 352. 

*— *flhor«. /« j/o/Wa King v, Bnady, i fikM. & Pul. 188. 
«— - the liank. /» /^^mT. Thomas t^. Hatch, 3 Sumner, 179. 

iha land. Reg. f/. Inhabita»U, % Q. B. 4^9. 

the line o£ Barnam v. Banks, 45 Mo. 349. 

the line thereof. U, S. v. B. A M. R. R., 3 Cent. L. J. 337. 

the pieee n tation. of this dkxmment. In contract Bartlett v. 

Holmes, 13 C. B. 630. 

-m — the roed. Smith v, Slocemb, 9 Gray, 37 ; Newhall v. Ireson, 
3 Cush. 595. 

— r—the tea or flate* In deed. Saltonstall v. Proprietors, 7 Cush. 

195. 
the section line. Munkers v. K. Q^ St. J. & C. B. R. R., 60 Mo. 

334. 
the stocks. In insurance policy. Hood v, Manhattan, ^tc., Ins. 



Co., II N. Y. 532. 

— the train. In bill of Iculing, Poucher v. New York Cent R. Co., 
49 N. Y. 263. 

— trial In statute. Com. v, McLellan, 121 Mass. 31. 

— the triaL In statute. Yoke v. Robertsoa, 9 Whart 1 59 ; Frank- 
lin Ins. Oo. v. Findlay, 6 Wtiart. 483 (37 Am. Dec. 430.) 

your paying interest. In contract, Dodd v. Ponsford, 6 C. B. 



(N. S.) 332. 

employed water. In contract. Madre v, Saiinders, 3 Jones (L.) i. 

heirs the body. In deed. Den v. Gillot, % Term. Rep. 431. 

in distrew the shore* In statute. The Mac, 4^5 L. T. (N. S.) 907. 

money hand or in bank. In will. Copia's Estate, 5 Phila. 214. 

a week. In statute, Ronkendorfi v, Tayk>r, 4 Pet. 361. 

a week during three suooessire weeks. In statute, Francis t^. 

Norris, 2 Miles, 150. 

in each week fbr at least tw^TS saeoessive weeks. In 

statute. Early v. Doe, 16 How. 610. 

in every six months. In statute, Virginia Steam Co. v, U. S., 



I Taney Dec. 418. 

— oalendar montli's notioe. In statute. Young v, Higgon, 6 M. 
4 W. 49. 

— cause of aetion. In statute, Kempton «/. Willey, 9 C. B. 738. 

— day after date. In note, Taylor v* Jacoby, 2 Pa. St. 496. 

— day previons. In constitution, Hyde v. White, 24 Tex. 137. 

— Ibot high. In contract. Barton v, McKelway, 22 N. J. (L.) 165. 

— pair of boots. In indictment. State v. Harris, 3 Harr. (Del.) 



559. 

T^pULt. In indictmemi. State v. Lavake, 26 Minn, s^ (37 Am. 
Rep. 415). 

— town or oity lot. In statute. Wassell v, Tiirmah, 25 Ark. loi • 

— month. In contracts Spartali v, Beaecke, 10 C. B. aia. 

— month or more. In statute. Blunt v, Healop, 8 Ad. & Ell. 581. 



ONE. 



246 



OPPOSITE. 



ONE — Continued. 



— mortal bruise. In indictment. State v. Crank, 2 Bailey, 66 (23 
Am. Dec. 117). 

— thousaad feet. In contract. Brown v. Brooks, 25 Pa. St 210. 

— whole year. In statute, Paris v, Hiram, 12 Mass. 262. 
year. In insurance policy. Manly v. United Marine Insurance 



Co., 9 Mass. 85 (6 Am. Dec. 40). 
ONE-FOUBTH. In deed, McCaul v, Kilpatrick, 46 Mo. 434- 

part of my estate. In will, Allison v, Chaney, 63 Mo. 283. 



ONLY. 



ONITS. 
OFEir. 



In constitution, Shortridge v. Mason, i Abb. U. S. 58. 

In deed, Schroder v. King, 38 Conn. 78 ; Hatch v. White, 22 Pick. 521. 

In statute, Perrine v. Cheeseman, 6 Halst. 174 (19 Am. Dec. 388). 

proper use. In deed, Caldwell v, Pickens, 39 Ala. 514. 

by words . In statute, Tumey v, Dodwell, 3 El. & Bl. 137. 

for one voyage . In insurance policy, Everett v, Tunno, i B. 

& Aid. 145. 

in the following oases — ; — ^.. In statute. People v. Fair, 43 Cal. 1 37. 

proband!. Davis v, Rogers, i Houst. 44. 

aeoount. In statute, Sheppard v, Wilkens, i Ala. 62 ; Goodwin 



V, Harrison, 6 Ala. 438 ; Bradford v, Barclay, 39 Ala. 33 ; Nisbet v, 
Lawson, i Ga. 406; Dalhonde z/. Lausans, 21 La. Ann. 406; Dixon 
V, Lyons, 13 La, Ann. 160 ; Whittelsey v, Spoffard, 47 Tex. 13. 

— and extend. In city charter. Sugar Refining Co. v. Mayor, 26 
N. J. (Eq.) 247. 

— and gross lewdness and lasoivioiis behavior. In statute. 



OPENED* 



Com. V, Warden, 128 Mass. 52 ; Com. v, Catlin, i Mass. 8 ; State v, 
Millaird, 18 Vt. 574. 

— and keep in repair. In city charter. Smith v. Corporation of 
Washington, 20 How. 135. 

— and notorious insolvenoy. Li statute, Hardesty v. Ken- 
worthy, 8 Blackf. 304. 

and peaceable entry* In statute, Thompson v, Kenyon, 100 
Mass. 108. 

— oonrt. Ex parte Branch, 63 Ala. 385 ; Hobart v, Hobart, 45 Ala. 
SOI. 

— and dedicated to the public use. In statute, Oliver ?/. 
Worcester, 102 Mass. 489 ; Hemphill t^. City of Boston, 8 Cush. 197. 

— and worked. In statute. Beckwith v, Whalen, 70 N. Y. 430. 



OPERATING. 



OPINION. 

OPPOSENG. 
OPPOSITE. 



In contract, Eaton v. Smith, 20 Pick. 150. 

expenses. In statute. Smith v. Eastern R. Co., 124 Mass. 154: 

Eastern R. Co. v, Rogers, 124 Mass. 527. 

corporation a railway. In statute, McKnight v. I. & Minn. 

R. R., 43 Iowa, 406. 

rivjs. Thayer v. Mann, 2 Cush. 371. 

Houston V. Williams, 13 Cal. 27 ; State v, Allen, 46 Conn. 532. 

• In statute. Bales v. State, 63 Ala. 30. 

— interest. In statute. Re Jackson, 14 Bank. Reg. 449. 

— party. In statute, Eslava v, Mazange, i Woods. 623 ; Trabue 
V, Turner, 10 Heisk. 447. 



PjPPOSITE, 247 OR. 



— Continued. 

politics. In statute. People v. Supervisors of Sullivan Co., 56 

N.Y. 249. 

OPTION . In lease. Walker v, Eagler, 30 Mo. 130. 

In statute, Tenney v, Foote, 4 Bradwell, 594. 

of my executors. In will. Harper v, Bobb, 47 Ala. 547. 

at the of. In contract, Posey v. Scales, 55 Ind. 282, 

buyers . In order, Pickering v, Demeritt, 100 Mass. 416. 

Robbing v, Butler, 24 111. 428 ; Kindig v. Smith, 39 111. 301 ; People v. 
Applegate, 5 Cal. 295 ; Reed ^ Kilbourn Soc, L. R., 10 Q. B. 
264 ; Roome v, Phillips, 24 N. Y. 463 ; Hall v. Sweet, 40 N*. Y. 97 ; 
Simpson v, Halliday, L.. R., i H. L. 315. 

In bond, Dumont v, U. S., 8 Otto, 143 ; Robinson v, Brinson, 20 Tex. 
438 ; Parker v, Carson, 64 N. C. 563. 

In contract, Douglass v. Eyre, Gilp. 147. 

In deed, Elliott v. Turner, 2 C. B. 446. 

In indictment. People v, Gilkinson, 4 Park. C. C. 26; Moigan v. 
Com., 7 Gratt. 592. 

In statute. Towns v. Mead, 16 C. B. 1 38 ; Crowz/. Beardsley, 68 Mo. 435 ; 
Com. V, Hadcraft, 6 Bush, 92 ; Robb v. Belt, 12 B. Monr. 647 ; Clifford 
V, State, 29 Wis. 327 ; State v, Brandt, 41 Iowa, 593 ; Sparrow v. 
Davidson College, ^^ N. C. 35 ; Hannum v. Day, 105 Mass. 34 ; U. 
S. V, Ten Cases of Shawls, 2 Paine, 162 ; Hughes v. Smith, 64 N. C. 
493; Com. V, Griffin, 105 Mass. 185; Green v. Wood, 7 Q. B. 178; 
Reg. V, Watford, 9 Q. B. 635 ; King v, Comm'rs, i B. ^ Ad. 240 ; 
Reg. V, Irving, 12 Q. B, 430; Queen v, Shiles, i Q. B. 917 ; U. S. v, 
Haines, 5 Mason, 273. 

In will, Easton v, Pratt, 2 H. & C. 680 ; .Jackson v, Blanshaw, 6 Johns. 
54; Soulle V. Gerrard, Moore, 422; Cro. Eliz. 525; Price v. Hunt, 
36 Car. II; Pol. 645 ; Woodward v. Glasbrook, 2 Vern. 388 ; Barker 
V, Surtees, 2 Str. 1175 ; Walsh v, Peterson, 3 Atk. 193 ; Framingham 
V. Brand, i Wils. 140 ; Wright v, Kemp, 3 T. R. 470 : Hunt v. Hunt, 
1 1 Mete. 88 ; Winter v, Perratt, 5 R & C. 59 ; Johnson v, Simcock, 6 
Hurl. & N. 14; re Merrick, L. R., i Eq. Cas. 551 ; re Kirkbridge's 
Trusts, L. R., 2 Eq. Cas. 400 ; Reid v, Braithwaite, L. R., 1 1 Eq. Cas. 
515; Douglass V, Eyre, Gilp. 147 ; Raborg v, Hammond, 2 H. & G. 
42; Armstrong v. Moran, i Bradf. 314; Holcomb v. Lake, 24 N. 
J. (L.) 686 ; Sawyer v, Baldwin, 20 Pick. 373 ; Cornish v, Wilson, 6 
Gill, 299; Carpenter v, Bouldin, 48 Md. 122; Holcomb v. Lake, i 
Dutch. 605 ; Nevison v. Taylor, 3 Halst. 43; Den v. Taylor, 2 South 
413; Den V, English, 2 Harr. 280; Den v, Allaire, Spen. 6 ; Ely v. 
Ely, 5 C. E. Green, 44 ; Den v. Mugway, 3 Green, 330. 

any other. Sloan v. Whitman, 5 Cush. 333. 

bearer. In note. Mechanics' Bk. v. Straiten, 3 Abb. App. 

Deo. 269. 

either of them. In statute. Belcher v. State, 8 B. & C. 209. 

order. In note. Mechanic's Bk. v, Straiton, 3 Abb. App. 



Dec. 269. 

— other thing. Com. v. Dejardin, 126 Mass. 47. 

— otherwise. Com. v. Rice, 9 Mete. 258, and see 2 Wheat. 119. 



agent surveyor. In appointment, Lycoming Ins. Co. v. Wood- 
worth, 83 Pa. St. 223. 



OM. 



S4S 



ORDER. 



OB — Continued. 



OBOHABB* 
OBBAjmO. 



«-<^ fl»t«r. /• $tatmU, RoUaod t^. Com., %% Pa. St. 306. 

flow of water io M oao d navigattaa impeded. In siaimU. 

SUte V. Pq(^, 74 H. Cf 4M. 

nnUwfia — r ibraCble iMiry. im staiuU. Winterfield v. SUusa, 
t4 Wi*. 194. 

/ir «e^//. Wrights. Wheatley, Cro. EUz. .854. 

ministar. /if x/4i/«c//. KUxbie v, Antran, 4 Opnn. 1 54 . 

. mlDJeter of the Goq^ Im iUUuts. Loffdonderry v. Cht^tgg, 

a N. H. 9^ <9^m. !>€.) 61. 

Lortng 4^. IM^Wy, i Cal. 27 ; Belt v, Davis, i Cal. 156; Gilman v. 
Contra Costa, 8 Cal. 57 ; MUU v, Martin, 19 Jolins. 7. 

In cmUraet, Toeat v, Stantoo» 14 Conn. 445. 

In statute, Dakio v. Graves, 48 N. H. 47 ; People v. R. Co., 76 N. Y. 
294: Shaw «/. NeaJcu 6 H. L. Cas. 581 ; Bm^. v. Williams, 2 C. & K. 
51 ; Reg. V, Caite, i C. ^ K. 741 ; Reg. v, Lockett, f Leach, 1 10; Reg. 
y. Cuny, 2 Moody, 218; Reg. v, Cullen, s C k P. 116; Reg. v. 
Richards, Russ. & Ry. 193 ; People v. Way, 10 Cal. 336 ; McGuire 
V, State, 37 Ala. 161 ; Com. v. Fisher, 17 Mass. 46; Com. v. Butter- 
ick, lOQ Mass. 12; State v. Cooper, 5 Day, 250; Jones v. State, 50 
Ala. 161 ; McGuire v. State, 37 Ala. 361 ; Hoskins v. State, 11 Ga. 
92 ; People v, Shaw, 5 ^ohns. 236 ; People v, Farrington, 14 Johns- 
348; Queen v, Herler, 17 Q. B. 230; Hinnemann v. Rosenback, 39 
N. Y. 98 ; Dakin v. Graves, 48 N. H. 45. 

Aflboting a eubBtfOitial rjght* In st^tnt^. Martin v. Windsor 

HoUl Cov 70 N. y. Joi. 

for money. In indictnuni, Con». v. McKean, 98 Mass. 9. 

— p*- p^ the d^very of goode* In statute. B^. v. Illedge, x C. ft 
K. 971 ; Horton v. State, 53 Ala. 499* 

for the payment of money. In statute. Re Edmundson, 17 Q. 

R 68; Morant v. Taylor, i Es. Div. #89; Com. v, Kepper, 114 
Mass. 278 ; Evans v. State, 8 Ohio St. 196 ; Rex v. Ravenscroft, 
I Russ. & Ry. i(>i ; Rex v, Richard^, i Russ. & Ry. 194- 

involving the oooetitatioDality of a law of this State. In 

statute. People v. Schoonmafker, 50 N. Y. 499. 

involving tiie merits of an action. In statute. FatrchQd v. 

Dean, 13 Wis. 331 ; Rahn v. Gunnison, 12 Wis. 529; Johnson v. 
fldred, 13 Wis. 483. 

made upon a eummary applioaHon after judgment. In 

statute, Faircbild v. Dean, 13 Wis. 331 ; Johnson v. Eldred, 13 Wis- 
483; Rahn v, Gunnison, 12 Wis. 529. 

or aasi^Bn^. In bill of ladings Henderson v, Gomptoir D*£s- 

compte, L. R., 5 P. C. C. 253. 

oertifloate or allowanoe. In statute, Sta^ v. Grant, 74 Mo. 

36. 

In . In statute, Atfy-Gen. v, Sillem, 2 H. & C. 623. 

Intermediate offboting the judgment. In statute, Hackett 

V, Belden, 47 N. Y. 624. 

flpeoial made after final judgment. In statute. Wells v. An- 
thony, 35 Col. 696. 

te the of &e indoner'e name. In note, U. S. v. White* s 

Hill, 59 (37 Am. Dec. 374). 



ORDERED, 249 ORIGIN ALL Y. 



any paUie imiHrovemant oow . In statuie. Christ Chmck ». 

Burlington, 39 Iowa, 224. 

« 

OBDEB8. McDonough v. Nicholson, 46 Mo. 55. 

intMiaediato afltoting the maiits. In si^iuts. Seldta m. DeL 

& Hud. Canal Co., 29 N. Y. 634. 

previous . In siaiuii. Bull v. Pyle, 41 Md. 419. 

OBDIN AKOB. In statute, StraMman t/. Jermon, 56 Mo. 104 ; Com. v. Turner, i Gush. 

493. 

OBDINABY. btiBiness. Taylor v. Town of Monroe, 43 Conn. 36 ; Tomlinson 

V. Town of Derby, 43 Conn. $62. 

In corporation fy^w. Hoyt v, Thompson, 19 N. Y. 207. 

care. R. Co. v. Smith, 43 III. 132: Neal v. Gilbert, 23 Conn. 

443 ; Meredith v. Reed, 96 lod. 534 ; Phiisdelphia, etc., R. Co. v, 
Kerr, 2$ Md. jsi ; Cayzer v. T^lor, 10 Gray, 274; Fallon v. City of 
Boston, 3 Allen, 38 ; Fletcher v. Boston, etc., R Co., i Allen, i ; 
Cunningham v. Hall, 4 Allen, 268 ; Toledo, etc., R. Co. v, Goddard, 
25 Ind. 185 ; Johnson v, Hudson River R. Co., 6 Duer, 633 ; Penn- 
sylvania R. Co. V. Ogier, 35 Pa. St. 60 ; Brown v. Kendall, 6 Cus)i. 
892 ; Moore v. Central R. Co., 14 N. J. (L.) 368. 

diligeaee. Erie Bk. f/, Smitb, 3 Brewst. 9. 

domestio boaineas of fiunily ooBioenia. In statute. Center 

Turn. Co. v. Smith, 12 Vt. sis ; Turnpike v. Taylor, 6 N. H. 499. 

flmoea. In statute, Hina v. Wooding, 37 Conn. 123. 

\ax^pMi%b, In statute. Ball v. Yeates, 33 Barb. 627. 

negligMMe. Walls v. Hew York Ceatral R. Co., 24 N. Y. 181 ; 



Moore v. Cass, 10 Kans. 288; Scott v. De Payster, i Edw. 513. 

— partnership. In statute. Ward v. Brandt, 11 Mart. 321 (13 
Am. Dae. 352). 

— ppooaaa of law. In statute. Neenan v. Smith, 50 Mo. 525. 

— atook. Usher v. Hiatt, 21 Kas. 548. 

— traina. In statute. Turner v. R. Co., L. R., 17 Eq. Cas. 561. 

— way of hia trade. In statute. Re Hodgson, i Ch. Div. isi- 



baaineaaor workof the oallinga. In statute. Amis v. Kyle, 

2 Yerg. 31. 

OBOAinZATZON. perfoot the . In statute. New Haven, etc., R. Co. v. Chap 

man, 38 Conn. 56. 

OBVKVAIi. Osborne v. Farmers' Loan Co., 16 Wis, 39 ; Read v. McCormick, 4 

Cal. 342. 

oontraotor. In statute. Heame v. C. k R. R. Co., S3 Mo. 324. 

inTOBtM. Pitts V. Hall, 2 Blatchf. 229. 

juriadiotioxL. Ck>hens v. Virginia, 6 Wheat, 396. 

owner. Simons v. Vulcan Oil Co., 61 Pa. St. 202. 

pairtiea. In statute. Lewis v. Weisenbaum, i Mo. (App.) 22. 

In statute. Hotchkiss' Appeal, 32 Conn. 353. 



the . In notice. Cocks v. Chandler, L. R., i f Eq. Cas. 446. 

QBXOINAUi'S'. granted. In statute. Dalton v. Nelson, 3 Dill. 469. 

aooount exceeding £$. In statute. Pope v. Banyard, 3 M. & 

W. 4?5. 

term created. In statute. Charlton v. Sterltord, L. R., 7 C. P. 

201. 
32 



ORPHANS, 



250 



OTHER. 



OTBSEL 



In will, Heiss ik Murphy, 40 Wis. 276 ; Soohan v. City of Philadelphia. 
33 Pa, St. 9. 

bmdneM. In constitution. Hall v, Wells» S4 Miss. 289. 

In will. AUgood v, Blake, L. R., 7 Ex. 339; Alexander v, Greenup, i 
Munf. 134 U Am. Dec. 541). 

acts. In will, Cusack's Estate, 3 Brewst. 325. 

aotiODB. In statute. Valentine v, Cily of Boston, 20 Pick. 201. 

and diflbrent. In pUa. Brancker v. Molyneux, i Man. & G. 

710. 

artiolM i>eriihable in their own nature. In insurance policy. 

Baker v. Ludlow, 2 Johns. Cas. 289. 

bailee. In statute. State v. Broderick, 7 Mo. (App.) 21. 

banlring game. In statute. Randolph v. State, 9 Tex. 521. 

buflineas. People Mut. Ins. Co. v. Westcott, 14 Gray, 440. 

In statute. Wilson v, Sandford, 10 How. 99; Darwin v. 



Jones, 82 111. 107. 

— cause. In statute. State v, McGarry, 21 Wis. 497. 

— claimant. In trust deed, Schulenbuiig^ v. Magwire, 42 Mo. 381. 

— erime. In constitution. Brown's Case, 112 Mass. 409 (17 Am. 
Rep. 114). 

— devise. In statute. U. S. v. Speeden i Cranch C. C. 535. 

— dues. In statute. Ayrton v. Abbott, 14 Q. B. i. 

— effects. In will, Hodgson v. Jex, 2 Ch. Div. 122. 

— Mony. In statute. State v. Shock, 68 Mo. 552; State v. Brown, 
60 Mo. 141. 

— fbur-wheel spring carriage. In statute. Housatonic. etc, 
Tp. Co. V. Frink, 15 Pick. 443; Same v. Neil, 9 Ohio, 11. 

— hereditary^disease. In insurance policy. Gridleyz^. North-west- 
ern Ins. Co., 14 Blatchf. 108. 

— impediments. In statute. Prim v. State, 36 Ala. 246. 

— instruments of writing which are required- to be recorded. 

In statute. Hooker v. Haramell, 7 Nev. 233. 

— insurance. In insurance policy, Allison z/. Phcenix Ins. Co., 3 



Dill. 480; Brown v. Cattaraugus Ins. Co., 18 N. Y. 385 ; Mussey v^ 
Atlas Mut. Ins. Co., 14 N. Y. 79; Carpenter z/. Providence Ins. Co., 
16 Peters, 495; Dahlbergz/. St. Louis Mut. Ins. Co., 6 Mo. (App.) 121 ; 
iEtna Ins. Co. v. Tyler, 16 Wend. 385.(30 Am. Dec. 90); Lockwood 
V. Middlesex Ins. Co., 47 Conn. 554; Van Alstyne v. MXxa, Ins. Co., 
14 Hun, 360. 

— metals. In statute. Casher v. Holmes, 2 R & Ad. 593. 

mill or mills. In contract. Phcenix Cotton Manf'g Co. v^ 



Hazen, 118 Mass. 350. 

— moneys. In statute. State v. Moeller, 48 Mo. 331. 

— noxious or destructive substance or liquid. In statute. Peo- 
ple V. Van Deleer, 53 Cal. 147. 

— olgect. In charter. Seibert v. Cavender, 3 Mo. (App.) 423. 

— office and capacity. In statute. Converse v. U. S., 21 WalL 



463. 



QflOces. In statute. Rex v. Hall, i B. & C. 238. 
party. In statute. State v. Farmer, 54 Mo. 439. 



OTHER. 251 OTHERWISE. 



OTHSB — ConUnued. 

perils. In insuriamce policy, Gartside v, O. B. Ins. Co., 62 Mo. 

322. 

I>erBOXi. In statute. State v, Arnold, $5 Mo. 89; State v. Porter, 



26 Mo. 201 ; Lamb v, Helen, 26 Mo. 420; Wood v, Mytton, 10 Q. B. 
809; State V, Stoller, 38 Iowa. 321. 

— person or persons. In statute. Sandiman v. Beach, 7 B. & C. 
100. 

— proceedings. In statute, Solomon v, Graham, 5 El. & Bl. 324. 

— proper oifioer. In statute. King v. Justices, 5 B. & C. 243. 

— property. In statute, Bradley v, Southborough, 6 Cush. 142 ; 
Livermore v. Freeholders, 5 Dutch. 245; State v, Marshall, 13 Tex. 

55- 

— purposes. In statute, St. Louis v, Stifel, 42 Mo. 578. 

— sLtnilar officers. Weld v. May, 9 Cush. 191. 

— structures. In statute, Collips v. Drew, 67 N. Y. 149. 

— surviving. In will. Re Arnold, L. R., 10 Eq. Cas. 252. 

— terms. In statute, Ganet v, Wheeler,' 4 Wis. 308. 
valuable thing. In statute. State v. Church, 43 Conn. 471 ; 



Pickett V, State, 60 Ala. ^^, 

valuable things. In will. Cavendish v. Cavendish, i Cox Ch. 

77; I Brown Ch. 467. 

any game. In statute, Ellis t/. Beale, 18 Me. 337 (36 Am. Dec. 

726). 

derioal or defects. In statute. Town of Duanesbuigh v, Jen- 
kins, 40 Barb. 574. 

drunkenness, profligacy or any cause. In statute, Edson v, 

Hayden, 20 Wis. 682. • 

dwelling-house or building. In statute. La Crosse, etc., R. 

Qo,v, Vanderpooly 11 Wis. 120. 

incomi>etency9 improper conduct or cause. In statute. State 

V. McGarry, 21 Wis. 406. 

locomotives and all personal property. In mortgage, Pen- 
nock V, Coe, 23 How. 117. 

mechanic, miner or person. In statute, Bevitt v, Crandall, 19 

Wis. 581. 

money, goods, eflfocts or estate. In statute, Harlow v. Tufts, 

4Cush. 448.J 

no than such agents. In statute, Nurton v, Dickson, 5 Hurl. 

& N. 640. 

wherry, lighter or craft. In statute, Reg. v. Reed, 23 L. T. 

Rep. 156 ; 28 Eng. L. & Eq. 133. 

In statute, Welch v, Seymour, 28 Conn. 387 ; Comm'rs v. Green- 
wood, I Dessau. 452 ; State v, Passiac, 7 Vroom, 382 ; Gosling v, 
Veley, 12 Q. B. 328. 

not known or used by . In statute, Bartholomew v. Sawyer, 

4 Blatchf. 350. 

rWisus. Robinson v, Jones, 8 Mass. 536 (5 Am. Dec. 114). 

In statute. Fellows v. Clay, 4 Q. B. 319 ; Haight v, McVeagh, 69 111. 
674 ; State v. Carr, 3 Mo. (App.) 9 ; Com. v. Rice, 9 Mete. 253 ; Aston 



OTHERWISE. 



252 



OUT-HOVSE& 



:• m: 



^WISE- 



OUR. 
OUBTBR. 



OUT. 



OUTGBY. 
OUTJfiTH. 

OUTGK>nrG. 

ouToonros. 



OUT-HOUSB. 



Om-HOXJ8B8. 



Continued. 

V, Gtotgit, 3 B. & Aid. 398; Black v, R. Co., 7 C. E. Green, 130; 9 
C. E. Green, 455. 

In wiU, Lewi* v. Smith, 9 N. Y. $aa. 

— ^ — aaquirad. Jn staMe, Robert* v. Jackson, 4 Yerg. 509 ; Hoover 
V. Gregory, 10 Yeig. 4$i ; Guion 9^. Burton, Meigs (note), 572; 
Towls V. Raine, a Heisk. 35S; PeHnimaa v, Francisco, i Heisk. 
511. 

detftroying. In wiU. Cheese v. Lovajoy, 3 Prob. Div. 253. 

dJH^ooed o£ In statuti. Ham f/. State, itf How. 126. 

uaad and praotifled. i« canstiiuium. Backus v. Lebanon, 11 

N, H. 19 (35 Am. Dec. 466). 

ptiniah. In statute. Reg. v, Willmott, i R & S. 40. 

diraot purohaaa or -*-*. In statute. Downing v, Marshall. 23 N. 

Y. 366. 
not . In deed, Thayer v. Wendell, i Gall. 37. 

or . In statute, U. S. v, Bettelun, i Woods, 65$. 

not herein proTided tot. In statute, Movius v. Arthur, s 

Otto, 147. 

Life Assn. of America ?/. St. Louis Co., 49 Mo. 512. 

ohild. In will. Beck v, Metz, 25 Mo. 70. 

Warfield v, Lindell, 38 Mo. 581 ; Burch v, Houston, 75 111. 347 ; Ball v. 
Palmer, 81 III. 370; Ewingt^. Burnet, 11 Pet. 41. 

In statute, Sherwood v. Waller, 20 Conn. 263. 

and . In deed, Philadelphia, etc^ R, Co. v, Lehigh Nav. Co., 

36 Pa. St. 204. 

— — ot In contract. Cochrane v. Green, 9 C. B. (N. S.) 465. 

of the ooun|ry. In statute, Maraell v, Israel, 3 Bibb, 510. 

-*— of the jimadietioo. In statute. Meyer v. Roth, 51 Cal. 582. 

of the prooeede of the llret oetton ginned. In contract. 

White V, Claffin, 32 Ark. 59. 

of the State. In statute. Whitton v. Waas, 109 Mass. 43 ; Sleght 

V. Kane, 1 Johns. Cas. 76. 
by . in statute, Allen v, Sparkhali I B. A Aid., 102. 

In insurance polity. Macy v. Wheeling Ins. Co., 9 Mete. 364 ; Hancox 
V. Fishing Ins. Co., 3 Sumner, 134; Paddock v, Franklin Ins. Co.. 
If Pick. 227 ; Rogers v. Mechanics Ins. Co., 1 Story, 603. 

surveyor. In statute. Highway Bd. v. Hardcasto, 19 C. B. (N. 

S.) 180. 

In deed, Crosse v. Raw, L. R., 9 Ex. 209 ; MIdgley v, Coppock, 4 Ex. 
Div. 309. 

In statute. Queen v, Shaw, I2 Q. B. 421. 

In statute. Rex v, Ellison, i Moody, 336 ; Rex v. Stallion, f Moody, #00 : 
Elsmore v. Inhabitants, 8 B. & C. 465 ; Rex v. Winter, i Russ. & Ry. 
296 ; Rex V, Parrott, 6 C. & P. 402 ; Rex v, Jones, i C. & K. 303 ; 3 
Moody, 308 ; Rex v, Taylor, i Leach, 49; Reg. v, Munson, 2 Cox C. 
C. 186 ; Rex v, Haughton, 5 C. & P. 5S5 ; SUte v, O'Brien, 2 Root, 
516 ; State v. Brooks, 4 Conn. 446. 

where people resort. In statute. Wheelock v. State, 1$ Tex. 

260 ; State v, Norton, 19 Tex. 102. 

In statute, Willoughby v, Shipman, 28 Mo. 50. 



OUTLA IV. 



253 



O WNER. 



OUTLAW. 

OtTTLAWBD. 
OTTTLBT. 

OUTLOT. 

OUTBAGS. 
OUTWABD. 

OVXB. 



OVBDBBBAW. 
OVXBDUB. 



! ^ :^ • 



OVBUT. 



OWING. 
OWN. 



OWNNB. 



Ex parte Franks, 7 Bing. j&j ; Drew z/. Drew, 37 Me. 389. 

In sUUuU. Dale Co. v, Gunter, 46 Ala. 118. 

Drew V, Drew, 37 Me. 389. 

belonging to any hotuM or building. In statute. Rex v. 

Richards, Russ. & Ry. 28. 

Hammond t^. St. Louis Public Schools, 8 Mo. 65 ; St. Louis v, Toney, 
21 Mo. 343 ; Trotter v, St. Louis Public Schools, 9 Mo. 70. 

sad indignity. McKinley v. Chicago, etc., R. Co.. 44 Iowa, 314* 

mark or diow of boalnaaa. In deed, Evans v, Davis, 27 W. R. 

285. 

In siatute. Gear v. Chicago etc., R. Co., 43 Iowa, 83 ; Newberry Turn- 
pike Co. V, Eastern R. Co., 23 Pick. 326; Boston, etc., R. Co. v. Mayor, 
2 Allen, 107 ; State v. Davenport R. Co., 47 Iowa, 507. 

flea. In statute. Gustin v. Brattle, Kirby, 299. 

that sunk In constitution. Re Burns, (16 Mo. 442. 

State V, Stimson, 24 N. J. (L.) 478. 

Hubbersty v, Manchester, etc^ R. Co., 8 B. & S. 424. 

and difllUMiored. In statute, Seymour v. Continental Ins. Co., 

44 Conn. 306. 

In statute. Points v, Attwood, 6 C. B. 49 ; Reg. v, St. Pancros, i El. 
B. & El. S98 ; Burgess v, Boetefear, 7 M. A G. 481. 

of a publio road. In statute. Louisville, etc^ Turnpike Co. v. 

State, 3 Heisk. 129. 

act. In statute, Jones v. Van Zandt, 5 How. 215. 

ahip. The Pk:kforton Castle, 3 Prob. Div. 11. 

aiMl ia indebted. Shattock v. People, 5 IlL 478. 

debt . In statute. Hall v, Pritcbett, 3 Q. B. Div. 215. 

or ooo«py tbe mill. In statute. Fitch v, Stevens, 4 Mete. 426. 

premiaefl. In statute. State v. Wyl. 5$ Mo. 67. 

In will. Evans v. Knorr, 4 Rawie, 68. 



at bia eatabUahmeut. In license. Rubber Co. v. Goodyear, 9 

Wall. 788. 

in her right. In deed. Merrill v. Bullock, 105 Mass. 4M 

on their land. In statute. Parker v. Cutler Milldam Co., 20 

Me. 353 (37 Am. Dec. 56). 

In statute. State v, Haynes, 66 Mo. 307 ; Bartholomew v. West, 2 DilU 
290 ; Radcliff t'. Wood, 25 Barb. 52. 

by them. In contract. Champion v. White, 5 Cow. 509. 

or oooupied In statute, Herskell v, Bushnell, 37 Conn. 36 (19 

Am. Rep. 299). 

In deed, Grier v, Grier, L. R., 5 H. L. 688. 

In insurance policy, Columbian Ins. Co. v, Laurence, 2 Peters, 25. 

In statute. Danforth v. Suydam, 4 N. Y. 66; Muldoon v. Pitt, 54 N. Y. 269; 
Mullinst/. People, 24 N. Y. 399; Platto v, Cady, 12 Wis. 466 ; Proctor v, 
H. A St. J. R. R., 64 Mo. 113; Lyon v. Hunt, 45 Ala. 657 ; Kuhleman v, 
Schuler, 35 Mo. 142; Watson v. N. Y. C. R. R.,47 N. Y. 1 57; Low 2/. Aus- 
tin, 20 N. Y. 181 ; Loonie v, Hogan, 9 N. Y. 435 ; Sargent z^. Machias:, 65 
Me. 591 ; Corbett v, Natt, 10 Wall. 464 ; Angell v, Pardington 
Vestry, 3 Q. B. 714 ; Gurdians v, Warton, 3 B. A S. 359 ; Blue v. 
Blue, 38 111. 9 ; Ins. Co*?/. Schueller, 60 III. 465; Wright v, Bennet, 4 



O WNER. 



254 



OYSTER. 



O W JN JBH — Continued. 

III. 258 ; Ins. Co. V, Manfg Co.. 6 III. 236 ; Janot v, Vaughn, 7 III. 
132; Queen v. Lee, 4 Q. B. Div. 75 ; Queen v. Swindon, 4 y.B. Div. 
305 ; King v, Sutton, 3 Ad. & Ell. 61 1 ; Bowditch i/, Bd., L. R., 6 Q. 

B. 567 ; Wheeler v. Gray, 4 C. B. (N. S.) 595 ; Eddleston v, Francis, 
7 C. B. (N. S.) 568 ; Evelyn v, Whickford, x El. B. & El. 131 ; Ripple 
Nav. Co. V. Hargraves, 17 C. B. 385 ; Peek v. Waterlo Bd.. 2 H. 4 

C. 717 ; Hunt v. Harris, 19 C. B. (N. S.) 40; U. S. v, Villalonga.23 
Wall. 40 ; Hampton v. Rouse, 22 Wall. 263 ; Park v, Willis, 2 Cranch 

' C. C. 83 ; Davenport v. Farrar, 2 111. 314; Smith v. Race, 76 III.490; 
Benson v, Monson, etc., Manf g Co., 9 Mete. 562 : Parker v. Baxter, 
2 Gray, 185; Ruggles v. Inhabitants, 11 Cush. 433; Wilder v. 
Haughey, 21 Minn. loi ; Harmon v. Munch, 21 Minn. 107 ; State v. 
Easton, etc., R. Co., 36 N. J. (L.) 181 ; Schoff v. Improvement Co., 
57 N. H. no; Smith v. Ferris, 13 N. Y. (S. C.) 553 ; McDermott v. 
Palmer, 11 Barb. 9; McMahon v. Tenth Ward School Officers, 12 
Abb. Pr. 129; Ermul v, KuUoh, 3 K as. 499 ; Chouteau z/. Thompson, 
2 Ohio St. 114; Tompkins v, Horton, 25 N. J. (Eq.) 284; North 
Pennsylvania R. Co. v, Davis, 26 Pa. St. 238 ; Davis v. Dodds, 20 
Ohio St. 473 ; Cook v, Montagu, L. R., 7 Q. B. 418. 

and oooupier. In plea, Russell v, Shenton, 3 Q. R 449. 

of any manufSftoturing OBtablishment. In statute. Benson v. 

Manson Manf g Co., 9 Mete. 562. 

of land. In city charter. Whiting v. City of New Haven, 45 

Conn. 303. 

of the land. In statute, Howard v, Robinson, 5 Cush. 122. 

of the vehiole. In statute. Camp v. Rogers, 44 Conn. 291. 

or oocnipant. In city ordinance. Bixler v. Hogan, 42 Mo. 367. 

In statute. Queen v. Turmine, 27 W. R. 151. 

In statute. Dawson v. Midland R. Co., L. R.. 3 



OW1TEB8. 



or oooupier. 

>r oooupiers. 

Ex.8. 

or owners. In statute, Wilson v. Dickson, 2 B. & Aid. 14 

any abutting . In statute. Gilligen v. Providence, 11 R. I. 258. 

benefloial ^^. In statute. Hirschfelder v. Mitchell, 54 Ala. 4i9- 

In statute. London School Bd. v. St. Mary, i Q. B. Div. 70. 

of land. In statute. Plumstead Bd. v. Land Co., L. R., 10 Q. B. 

203. 

of land in whioh there is a oreek or inlet. In statute. Gulf 

Pond Oyster Co. v. Baldwin, 42 Conn. 255. 

of stodfc. In statute. Savings Bank v. New London, 20 Conn. 



116. 

or occupants. In city charter. People v. Common Council of 
Rochester, 54 N. Y. 507. 

or proprietors. In statute. Lester v. Lobley, 7 Ad. & Ell. 129. 

part . In statute. Breck z/. Blair, 129 Mass. 127. 

OwxiJSJbUSHIP. entire unconditional and sole . In insurance policy. Insurance 

Co. V, Haven, 5 Otto, 242. 

add. In contract. Josling v, Kingsford, 13 C. B. (N. S.) 447- 
layings. In deed. Scratton v. Brown, 4 B. & C. 503. 
pond. In statute. Gulf Pond Oyster Co. v. Baldwin, 42 Conn. 2$$. 
spat. In plea. Mayor z^. Wool vet, 12 Ad. & Ell. 13. 



OXAUC. 
OY8TEB. 



PACKAGE. 



255 



PARCEL. 



PACKAGE. 



In coniracL Southern Ex. Co. v. Crook, 44 Ala. 468 ; Wyld v. Pick- 
ford, 8 M. & W., 443; Lamb v, Camden, etc., R. Co.» 2 Daly, 454. 

box, or thing. In contract, Boskowitz v. Adams Ex. Co., 93 

III 523. 

single 



PACKAGES, parcels or 



In contract. Read v, Spaulding, 5 Bosw. 395. 
~. In statute, U. S,v. Goldbach, i Hughes, 529. 



PACKET. 

PACKETS. 

PAID. 



In statute, Chouteau v, Str. Anthony, 1 1 Mo. 227. 

letters and • 4 Opinions Atty.-Gen., 276. 

and payable* In statute. Ford v, Smedley, 12 C. R 328. 



delivered, retained, satisfied or discharged. In statute. 

Atty.-G^n. v, Loscombe, 5 Hurl. & N. $82. 

in. In statute, Bailey v, Pittsburgh, etc.. Gas Co., 69 Pa. St. 334. 

or collected. In statute. Floyd v. State, 32 Ark. 201. 

bona fide . In statute. Queen v^ Overseers, 3 B. & S. 663. 

except the taxes shall actually have been . In statute, 

Lindsey v. Fay, 28 Wis. 177. 

he shall have . In statute. Queen v. Mayor, 10 Ad. & Ell. 68. 

moneys • In statute, St. Pancras v. St. Marylebone, 16 Q. B. 972. 

not to be within one year. In statute. Dryden v, Kellogg, 2 

Mo. (App.) 95. 

PAINTINGS. In statute, Arthur v, Jacoby, 13 Otto, 678; Woodward v. R. Co., 3 

Ex. Div. 121 
PAINTS. Smith v, Reynolds, 10 Blatchf. 100. 

PAIiMESTBY. or otherwise. In statute. Monck v, Hilton, 2 Ex. Div. 268. 

PAMPHLET. In statute, IT. S. v. Williams, 3 Fed. Rep. 484. 

PANEL. 



PANTO] 
PANTS. 



II . I 



People V. Coyodo, 40 Cal. 586. 

In statute, Daly v. Palmer, 6 Blatchf. 264. 

a pair of -^— • In indictment. State v, Johnson, 30 La. Ann. '904. 

In statute. Atty.-Gen. v, Barry, 4 Hurl. & N. 476 ; Coles v, Dick- 
inson, 16 C. B. (N. S.) 610. 

hangings. In statute, Heywood v. Potter, i EI. & Bl. 440. 

milL In insurance policy. Wood v. Hartford, etc., Ins. Co., 

13 Conn. 533 (35 Am. Dec. 92). 

writing. In indictment. State v, Jones, 2 McMuIlan (L.) 236 



(36 Am. Dec. 257). 

all my books and of every description. In will. Perkins v, 

Mathies, 49 N. H. 107. 

value. Delafield v. State, 2 Hill, 1 58 ; 8 Paige, 527. 

at . In statute, Hogg's Appeal, 22 Pa. St. 479. 

ourrenoy that is at • In note. Crim z/. Sellars, 37 Ga. 524, 

In patent. Clark v. Artie, 2 App. Cas. 423. 

In statute. St. Louis R. Co. v. North-western St. Louis R. Co., 69 Mo. 

65. 
lines. Fralt v. Woodward, 32 Cal. 219. 

PABAPHEBNALIA. Vass v. Southall, 4 Ired. (L.) 301 ; Mangey v, Hungerford, 2 

Eq. Cas. Abr. 156. 

of oats. In- indictment. State v. Brown, I Dev. (Law) 137 (17 

Am. Dec. 562). 

or package. In statute, U. S. v, Goldbeck, i Hughes, 539. 

In statute. Whaite v, R. Co., L. R.. 9 Ex. 67. 



PARCEL. 

PilUTTi — CoBtinyed, 



256 



PARTIAL 



^hi 



lot or 



In noiici €f saU, Miller v. Surke, 6 Daly, 171. 
In staimU. Martin v. Cole, 38 Iowa, 141. 



FABDOV. 



PABXNT. 



* AJUilH I 



In Statute. Rex z'. Douglass, i Camp. 212. 

small . In statute. Parker v. R. Co., 6 El. Bt Rl. 102. 

(J. S. V. Wilson, 7 Peters, 150; ex parte Wells, 18 How. 307 ; People 
V. Bowen, 43 Cal. 440 ; Sterling v, Drake, 29 Ohio St. 457 ; State v. 
Nichols, 26 Ark. 93 ; Cope v, Cain» 28 Pa. St. 297 ; People v. Potter, 
I Edm. 235; I Park. C. C. 47 ; SUte v. Blalock. Phill. (L.) 242 ; Knole 
V. U. S., 95 U. S. 153 ; re DePay, 3 Ben. 308. 

In statute. Beadon v. Parlett, L. R., 6 Q. B. 718. 

In will. Ralph v* Carrick, 5 Ch. Div. 989. 

or guardian. In statute,, McNeil z^. Collenson, 130 Mass. 167. 

Ayres v. Weed, 16 Conn. 291 ; Inhabitants of Milford v. Godfirey, i 
Pick. 91 ; Queen v. Inhabitants, 12 Q. B. 161. 

In statute. Reg. v. Bassett, 17 Q. B. 348 ; Smith v. Redding, L. R., 1 
Q. B. 489 ; Preston v. Buckley, L. R., 5 Q. B. 391 ; Queen v. Over- 
seers, 2 B. & S. 569. 

In Will. Dolan v. Macdermott, L. R., 5 Eq. Cas. 60. 

or plaoe. In statute. Washington v. Scott, 6 B. & S. 617. 



FABISHBS. 



FABX. 



FABSON. 



FABT. 



In statute. Ex parte Knowling, 6 B. & S. 197. 

FARTBHTOJIJm. Etherington v. Wilson, i Ch. Div. i6a 

In statute. Ethering v. Wilson, L. R., 20 Eq. Cas. 606. 

Perrin v. N. Y. Cent R. R., 36 N. Y. lao. 

On map. Price v. Plainfield, 40 N. J. (L.) 608. 

In statute. Lewis v. Hammond, 2 B. & AkL 210. 

taxes. In statute. King v. Inhabitants, i B. & Ad. 250. 

In statute. Pinder v. Barr, 4 El* & Bl. 114. 

and vioar. In statute. King v. Lacy, 5 B. & C. 708. 

Holly V. State, 54 Ala. 238 ; Vrooman v. Weed, 2 Barb. 330. 

In deed. Bullen v. Runnels, 2 N. H. 255 (y Am. Dec. $5). 

In will. Fulford v. Hancock, i Busb. Eq. 55. 

of a lot. In assessment. Lessee v. Long, 2 Ohio, 287. 

of an outstanding crop. In statute. Holly v. State, S4 Ala. 238; 

of a street. In charter. State v. City of Portage, 12 Wis. 565. 

of the goods so sold. In statute. Talver v. West, Holt, 178 ; 

Huide V. Whitehouse, 7 East. 588 ; Klurtz v. Suny, 5 Esp. 267 ; 
Gardner v. Grout, 2 C. B. (N. S.) 340 ; Garfield v. Paris, 96 U. S. 
557 ; Carver v. Lane, 4 E. D. Smith, 168 ; Smith v. Milliken, 7 Lans. 

336- 

of the United Kingdom. In statute. King v. Brownell, i Ad. 

& El. 598. 

child's . Davis v. Duke, Cam. & N. 361. 

in payment thereof. In statute. Artcher v. Zeh, 5 Hill, 205 ; 

Walker v. Nussey, 16 M. A W. 302. 

with. In will. Stevenson v. Glover, i C. B. 460. 

loss. In insurance policy. Singleton v. Boone Ins. Co., 45 Ma 

251 ; Insurance Co. v. Fogarty, 19 Wall. 640; Padelford v. Board- 
fnan, 4 Mass. 548; Wadsworth v. Pacific Ins. Co., 4 Wend. 33; 



PABTIAIk 



PARTIAL. 257 PARTY. 



PABTTATi — Continued. 

Globe Ins. Co. v, Sherlock, 25 Ohio St 50 ; American Ins. Co. -z/, 
Griswold, 14 Wend. 399. 

verdiot. U. S. v, Wat-kins, 3 Cranch C. C. 496. 

PARTICIPATE. In will. Robertson v. Eraser, L. R., 6 Ch. App. 696. 

PABTCCUIaAJEL aooount. In insurance policy. Bunistead v. Dividend Mut 

Ins. Co., 12 N. Y. 81. 

aooount of such loss or damage. In insurance policy. Catlin 

V, Springfield, etc., Ins. Co., i Sumner, 435. 

average* In contract. Kidston v. Ins. Co. L. R., i C. P. 535. 

In insurance policy. Kidston z/. Empire Ins. Co., L. R., i C. P. 535; 
Great Indian R. Co. v. Saunders, i B. & S. 50 ; 2 B. & S. 274 ; 
Bargett v. Orient Mut. Ins. Co., 3 Bosw. 385 ; Pierce v. Columbian 
Ins. Co., 14 Allen, 320. 

oharges. In agreement. Kidston v. Ins. Co., L. R., i C. P. 535. 

lien. Brooks v, Bryce, 21 Wend. 14. 

8ervioe& In constitution. Buck man v. State, 59 Ind. i ; Dills v. 

State, 59 Ind. 15. 

Aimiahed for a purpose. Harlem Car Co. v. Mayor of New 

York, 33 N. Y. 309. 

FABTICUTiABIiY. set forth. In statute. Perkins v. Dibble, 10 Ohio, 433 (36 

Am. Dec. 97). 

PABTICUIiABS. of estate and interest. In statute. Healey^/. R. Co., 5 B. 

& S. 780. 

FABTIES. Robbins v. Chicago, 4 Wall. 657 ; Parker v. Parker, 103 Mass. 172. 

In statute. Blood v. Fairbanks, 50 Cal. 420. 

oonoemed. In statute. King v. Justices, i B. & Aid. 638. 

to suoh prooeedi&g. In statute. Austin v. Olson, 9 B. & S. 47. 

to the oontraot. In statute. H. & St. L. R. R. v. St. Louis 

Public Schools, 34 Mo. 177. 

TASLTJTLON. Weiser^. Weiler, 5 Watts, 279. 

or wholly completed. In statute. McCandless' Appeal, 70 

Pa. St 210. 

McGee v. Dowdle, 33 Ark. 31 1. 

dormant . Jones v. Fegely, 4 Phila. i. 

Simpson v. Feltz, i McCord Ch. 213 (16 Am. Dec. 602); Houze v. 
Patterson, 53 Ala. 205 ; Randle v. State, 49 Ala. 14; Dawson v. Gin- 
ley, 22 Ark. 381 ; Sloo v. Law, 3 Blatchf. 459; Cox v. Hickman, 8 
H. L. 268 ; Gray v. Palmer, 9 Cal. 616; Beecham v. Dodd, 4 Houst. 
338; Pickerell v, Fisk, 11 La. Ann. 277; Boeklin v. Hardenberg, 
60 N. Y. 8; Porter v. McClure, 15 Wend. 187 ; Leggett v. Hyde, 
58 N. Y. 272; Loomis v. Marshall, 12 Conn. 70; Howell v. Harvey, 
5 Ark. 270. 

general • Eldredge v. Troost, 3 Abb. Pr. (N. S.) 20 ; Bigelow v. 

Elliott, I Cliff. 28. 

limited . Bigelow v. Elliott, i Cliff. 28. 

Bpeoial . Bigelow v. Elliott, i Cliff. 28. 

of a dollar* In statute. U. S. v. Gardner, 10 Pet. 618. 

Hunt V. Haven, 52 N. H. 162; Robinson v. Frost, 14 Barb. 536; Rich 
V. Husson, 4 Sandf. 115; Austin v. Fuller, 1 2 Barb. 360 ; Parsons v. 

83 



PARTY. 258 PASS. 

VASlTY-- Continued. 

People, 21 Mich. 509; Douglass z/. Gardner, 63 Me. 462; Merchants* 
Bk. V, Cook. 4 Pick. 40$; Walker v. Hill, 21 Me. 481 ; Robbins v. 
City of Chicago, 4 Wall. 657 ; Burr v, Bigler, 16 Abb. Pr. 177; Taber 
V. Gardner. 6 Abb. Pr. (N. S.) 147, 

In constitution, Cooke v, Cooke, 41 Md. 362. 

In deed, Clifford v, Hoare, L. R., 9C. P. 363. 

In statute. Western Bk. z^. Tallman, 15 Wis 92; Livermore ?f. Bain- 
bridge, 49 N. Y. 125 ; Peck V. Mayor of N. Y.. 3 N. Y. 489; Mollis 
V, Davis, 56 N. H. 74; Fenwick v, Laycock, 2 Q. R 108; Salt- 
marsh V, Candia, $1 N. H. 71 ; Marrion v. Lambert, 10 Bush, 295; 
Green v, Hudson River R. Co.. 31 Barb. 260 ; 32 Barb. 25 ; Merchants' 
Bk. V, Cook, 4 Pick. 405; Farrar v, Parker. 3 Allen, 556; New 
Brunswick Steam Co. v, Baldwin, 14 N. J. (L.) 440; Lovettv.Steam 
Saw-mill Assn., 6 Paige, 54 ; Archer v, Heiman. 21 Ind. 29; Sheldon 
V, Quinlen, 5 Hill, 441 ; People v. Croton Aqueduct Board, 5 Abb. 
Pr. 316; Snyder v, Neefus, 53 Barb. 63; Rupp v, Swineford, 40 
Wis. 28; re Comstock, 3 Sawyer, 518. 

aggrieved. In statute. Verdin v, Wray, 2 Q. B. Div. 609 ; ex 

parte Hutchins, 4 Q. B. Div. 90; ex parte Davidson, 18 C. B. 310; 
Martin v, Kanouse, 2 Abb. Pr. 390; Farrar v. Parker, 3 Allen, $$6 ; 

benefloially interested. In statute. Hyatt v, Allen, 54 Cal. 

353. 
decided against. In statute, Abbott v. Feary, 6 Hurl. & N. 1 1 $. 

— demanding an api>eal. In statute. Van Campen v. Ribble, 
17 N. J. (L.) 433 ; Jackson v. People's Bk,, 9 N. J. (Eq.) 205. 

— grieved. In statute, HoUis v, Marshall, 2 Hurl. & N. 76a 

— in interest. In statute, Baucum v, George, 65 Ala. 266. 

— interested. In statute. Re Leadbitter, 27 W. R. 267. 

— prevailing. In statute. Hawkins v. Nowland,* 53 Mo. 328. 
really interested. In statute, Yerby v. Sexton, 48 Ala. 311. 

suing forth the writ. In statute. King v. Justices, 3 R ft 

-. Adol. 887. ^ ^ 
to the action. In statute. Owens v, Gotzian, 4 Dill. 436; 

Montgomery County Bk. v. Marsh, 7 N. Y. 483 ; Seeley v. Clark. 

78 N. Y. 220 ; Penn v, Watson, 20 Mo. 1 3 ; Stein v, Weidman. 20 

Mo. 17 ; Woods v, De Figaniere, i Robt 607. 

to the proceedings. In statute. Robinson v. Vanderber^g Co.. 

37 Ind . 333. 
any . In statute. People v. Judge, 36 Mich. 331. 

each . In statute, Snodgrass v. Hunt, 15 Ind. 274; Hundhau- 

sen V. Atkins, 36 Wis. 518; Strob v, Hinckman. 37 Mich. 490- 

either . In statute. Sheldon v. Quinlen, 5 Hill, 441. 

real in interest. In statute, Webb v, Morgan, 14 Mo. 429 ; 

Williams v. Whitlock, 14 Mo. 553 ; Spratley v. Hartford Ins. Co., i 
Dill. 392 ; Van Rensselear v, Barringer. 39 N. Y. 9. 

PASS. In contract. North Missouri R. Co. v, Winkler, 29 Mo. 318. 

In statute. U. S. v, Mitchell, Baldw. 366; Perdue v. State, 2 Humph. 
494 ; Lovejoy v. Dolan, 10 Cush. 499 ; Grant v, Henly, 64 Mo. 162 ; 
U. S. V. Nelson, i Abb. (U. S.) 135 ; Com. v, Starr, 4 Allen. 301 ; 
Gentry v. State, 3 Yei^. 451 ; State v, Beeler, i Brev. 482 ; Com. v. 
Searle, 2 Binney, 332. 



I" ASS AGE. 



259 



PAVE. 



Winter v. Carter, 3 Younge & J. 313 ; Wortmanz/. Philadelphia, 33 Pa. 
St. 202. 

of this act. In statute. Eliot v, Cranston, 10 R. I. 88; Johnson 

V, Fay, 16 Gray, 144, 

room. Burdover v, Sindercombe, 2 Ld. Ray. 1470. 

forty days firom its . In statute. Logan v. State, 3 Heisk. 442. 

firom and after the of the act. In statute. U. S. v. Williams^ 

I Paine, 261. 

on her . In insurance policy. Bo wen v. Hope Ins. Co., 20 Pick. 

275 (32 Am. Dec. 214). 

prior to its . In statute. Charless v. Lamberson, i Iowa, 435. 

public or plaoe bttilt upon. In statute. Arnell v. Regents* 

Canal Co., 14 C. B. 566. 

In statute. Connor v. C, R. I. & P. R. R., 59 Mo. 285 ; Schultz v. 
Pacific R. R., 36 Mo. 13 ; Higgins v. H. & St. Joe R. R., 36 Mo. 418 ; 
Com. V. Boston, etc., R. Co., 129 Mass. 500 (37 Am. Rep. 382) ; Penn- 
sylvania R. Co. V. Price, 23 Alb. L. J. 69 ; U. S. v^ Libby, i Woodb. 
& M. 221 ; Sherman v. Hannibal, etc., R. Co., 72 Mo. 65. 

In statute. U. S. v. The Louisa Barbour, Gilp. 333 ; Ellis v. Pearce» I 
EI. B. & El. 457 ; Portsmouth Bridge Co. v. Nance, 6 Man. & G. 

233. 
barge carrying . In statute. Transportation Co. v. Cooper, 9 

Otto, 79. 
on oondition that the oanal through the town. In contract. 

State V. Collins, 6 Ohio, 142. 

U. S. V. Mitchell, Baldw. 366. 

of the act. In statute. Re Dalzell, 2 Ch. Div. 9. 

the decree. In Supreme Court rules. Silsby v. Foote, 20 How. 



PA.rnPEB. 



293. 

after the 



— of the act. In statute. Tomlinson v. Bullock, 4 Q. 
B. Div. 230. 

— members. In statute. Webb v. Whiffin, L. R, 5 H. L. 711, 



Hclbert v. Banner, L. R., 5 H. L. 28. 
now • In indictment. Com. v. Griffin, 3 Cush. 523. 

Cheavin v. Walker, 5 Ch. Div. 850 ; Patterson v. Tatum, 3 Sawyer, 
172. 

ftiel* In insurance policy, Howard v. Great Western Ins. Co., 

109 Mass. 384. 

In insurance policy, Lowell v. Westchester Ins. Co., 124 Mass. 418; 
Wallingford v, Southampton, 16 Conn. 435 ; McCarthy v, Hin- 
man, 35 Conn. 542. 

In statute. Queen v. Inhabitants, 13 Q. B. 873; NewMilford v. Sher- 
man, 21 Conn. 116, Lee Co. 2/. Lackie, 30 Ark. 768; La Salle Co. v, 
Reynolds, 49 111. 186; Walbridge v. Walbridge, 46 Vt. 617; Whit- 
ing's Case, 3 Pitts. 129; Opinion of the Justices, 11 Pick. 538; 124 
Mass. 596 ; Hutchings v, Thompson, 10 Cush. 238. 

ofyoTir town. In notice. Town of Beacon Falls v. Town of 

Seymour, 46 Conn. 281. 

In statute. Re Phillips, 60 N. Y. 16 ; Hooe v. Mayor, i Cranch C. C. 
98; Warren v, Henly, 31 Iowa, 31 ; Smith v. Corporation, 20 How. 

135. 



FA VEMENT. 



260 



PEACEABLE. 



FAVSMENT. 



PAYABIf. 



PAYING. 



PAYMENT. 



PAYMENTS. 



In statute. Re Gnibe, 20 Hun, 303. 

Tol man 17. Manufacturers' Ins. Co., i Cush. 75; Bealsz^. Home Ins. 
Co., 36 N. Y. 522 ; Lent v. Hodgman, 15 Barb. 274. 

In statute, Pennell v. Rhodes, 9 Q. B. 128. 

and disburse* In assignment, Nichols v, McEwan, 17 N. Y. 22. 

or put off. In statute. Rex v. Wool ridge, i Leach, 367 ; i East 

P. C. 179. 
OTer. In will. Going v, Emery, 16 Pick. 107 (26 Am. Dec. 645)- 

the lofls. In insurance policy. Talma n v. Manufacturers' Ins. 

Co., I Cush. 73. 

to aooount of. In promissory note, Lee v, Chillicothe Bk^ i 



Biss. 325. 

In deed. Day v, Radcliffe, 3 Ch. Div. 654 ; Massy v, Lloyd, 10 H. L. 
Cas. 248. 

In will, Ralph v, Carrick, 5 Ch. Div. 989 ; Haydon v. Rose, L. R-, 10 
£q. Cas. 224. 

as oonTenient. In contract. Black v, Bachelder, 120 Mass. 171. 

in cash or work. In note, Schlusser v, Watson, 37 Ala. 98. 

in trade. In contract, Dudley v, Vose, 114 Mass. 34. 

monthly. In pleading, Webster v. Cook, 38 Cal. 423. 

In statute. Hall v, Byrne, 2 111. 140. 

in good fiath and for valuable consideration. In siatuU. 

Re Meldrum, L. R., 9 Ch. App. 595; re Crawford, L. R.,9 Ch. App. 

752. 
for the said goods. In charter-party. Smith v. Sieveking, 4 



El. & Bl. 952. 

— thereout. In will. Seal v, Tichener, 2 Dick. Ch. 444. 



Wise V. Falkner, 45 Ala. 471 ; City of Hartford v. Francy, 47 Conn. 76: 
Blanchard v, Blanchard, 122 Mass. 558 ; First Nat. Bk. ?/. Whitman* 
94 U. S. 343 ; Bloodwor-th v. Jacobs, 2 La. Ann. 24 ; Rhodes v, 
Chesson, Busb. (L.) 336; Bailey v. Pittsburg, etc., R. Co., 69 Pa. St. 
334; Manice v, Hudson River R. Co., 3 Duer, 426 ; Brady v^ Was- 
son, 6 Heisk. 131 ; Atchison v. Lee, 75 Ind. 132. 

In plea, Maillard v, Duke of Argyle, 6 Man. & G. 40. 

In statute. Blount v. Windley, 5 Otto, 173 ; Hooper v, Stephens, 4 
Ad. & El. 71 ; Archer v. James, 2 B. & S. 76 ; Bean v. Brockmire, i 
Dill. 24; Hopkins V. Forrester, 39 Conn. 354; Turney v, Dodwell, 
3 El. & Bl. 137. 

of his debts in ftill. In statute, Hardwick v. Brown, L. R^ S 

C. P. 406. 

in . In statute. U. S. v. Venable, i C ranch C. C. 416." 

in of the above account. In note. Glenn v. Smith. 2 Gill & 

J. 493 (20 Am. Dec. 453). 

bona fide made. In statute, Willis v, Bk., 4 Ad. & El. 21, 

to the original contractor. In statute, Gridley v, Sumner. 43 



Conn. 14. 
previous 



— made thereon. In insurance policy. McKee v. Phce- 
nix Ins. Co., 28 Mo. 383. 

ten days after is made. Chapman v. Wacaser, 64 N. C. 532. 

possession. /// statute. Spencer v. McDonald, 22 Ark. 467. 



JPEARLS. 



26z 



PER. 



PSCXTLIAB. 



fSDDIiER. 



I^SNAIi. 



In will, Attoraey-General v, Harley, 5 Russ. 256. 

for speotadles. In statute, Arthur t/. Sussfield, 6 Otto, 129. 

name. In statute, Falkenberg v, Lucy, 35 Cal. 52. 

oonsideration. In statute. Cumberland v. Kelly, 3 R & Adol. 

602 ; Frost v. Frost, 3 B. & Adol. 612 ; Phelps v. Thomas, 6 Gray, 

327. 

— oonBideratlon or money's worth. In statute, Evatt v. Hutt, 
2 El. & Bl. 378. 

ixgurieB. In statute, Bierbauer v, R. Co., 1 5 Hun, 559 ; Chicago, 



etc., R. Co. V, Bayfield, 37 Mich. 205. 

interest. Stoddard v, Martin, i R. I. i (19 Am. Dec. 642 ) ; 



Burdine v. Grand Lodge, 37 Ala. 478. 

provision. In statute, Davis v, Davis, 61 Me. 395. 

Higgins V, Rinker, 47 Tex. 402 ; State v, Wilson, 2 Lea, .28. 

American Life Ins. Co. v, Rosenagle, 77 Pa. St. 507. 

In statute. King t/. Turner, 4 B. & Aid. 515; Dean v. King, 4 B. & 
Aid. 518 ; Gregg v. Smith, L. R., 8 Q. B. 302 ; Howard v, Lupton L. 
R., 10 Q. B. 598. 

In statute. People v. Mulholland, 19 Hun, 548 ; City of Chicago v, 
Bartee, 100 111. 61. 

judgments. In statute. Moody z/. Stephenson, i Minn. 401. 

laws. In constitution. Common Council v, Fairchild, i Ind. 

315 ; People v. Bay City, 36 Mich. 186. 

sum. In contract. White v, Arlett, i Bond, 326. 



In statute. Sexton v, C, R. I. & P. R. R., SS ^o. 416 ; Hudson v 
St. L., K. C. & N. R R., 53 Mo. 525 ; Graham v, Robinson, L. R., 2 
Q. B. 390; U. S. V, McGinness, i Abb. (U. S.) 125. 

Henry z'. Thompson, Minor, 209; U. S,v. Chouteau, 12 Otto, 611 ; 
Kinney v. Hosea, 3 Harr. (Del.) 77 ; Merchants' Bk. v. Bliss,. 13 Abb. 
Pr. 225 ; U. S. V, Ulrici, 3 Dill. 532 ; ex parte McNeil, 13 Wall. 236 ; 
Danforth v, Charles, i Dakota Terr. 286. 

In statute, Howe v. Taylor, 6 Oregon, 284 ; Davies v, Penton, 6 B. & 
C. 225. 

or forfeiture, peoimiary or otherwise. In statute, Raymond 

V, U. S., 14 Blatchf. 51. 

writing. Geary v. Physic, 7 D. & R. 653 (5 B. & C. 234. 



Wentworth v, Farmington, 48 N. H. 207 ; Ulshafer v, Stewart, 71 Pa. 
St. 170. 

In constitution, Weyman v, Childs, 41 N. Y. 1 59. 

In statute, Littlefield v. Delaware Canal Co., 3 Cliff. 371 ; Laurence v. 
Belger, 31 Ohio St. 175. 

a settlement. In statute. Bacon v. Thorp, 27 Conn. 251. 

action is . In statute. Holland v. Fox, 3 El. & Bl. 985. 

proceeding . In statute, Graham v, Robinson, L. R., 2 Q. B. 390. 

suit . In statute. Ex parte Mumsford, 56 Mo. 603. 

J^KN ITJdNTIABY. Millar v. State. 2 Kas. 174. 

U. S. V, Quincy. 6 Pet. 445. 

of the county. In statute, St. Louis v. Griswold, 58 Mo. 175. 

Presdridge v, Irwin, 46 Ala. 653. 



PER, 



262 



PERILS. 



PEBOOULTE. 
PEBCnSSIT. 



— Continued. 

In insurance policy, McClure v. Mississippi Valley Ins. Co.. 4 Mo. (App.) 

148. 
agreement. In bill. Robinson v. Weil, 45 N. Y. 810. 

capita. In will, Gibson v, Fisher, L. R., 5 Eq. Cas. 57. 

month. In contract, Taylor v. Laird, i Hurl. & N. 272. 

proouration. In bill of lading. Grant v, Norway, 10 C. B. 666. 

sample. In contract, Parker v. Palmer, 4 R & Aid. 389. 

BtirpeB. Gibson v, Fisher, L. R., 5 Eq. Cas. 57. 

In will. Ward v. Stow, 2 Dev. (Eq.) 509. 

ton -i— mile. In statute, Pryce v, R. Co., 4 App. Cas. 197. 

year. In contract, Curtiss v, Howell, 39 N. Y. 211. 

Mosier v, Caldwell, 7 Nev. 363. 

In indictment, Gibson z/. Com., 2 Va. Cas. iii. 

In contract, Mallan v, Radloff, 17 C. B. (N S.) 600. 

equity. In statute, Shaw v, Lindsey, 60 Ala. 344. 

title In charter. Warner i/. Middlesex, etc., R. Co., 21 Conn. 

445. 
a road. In statute, Whitenach v, Tunison, i Harr. 77. 

In statute. Boydell v, Drummond, 1 1 East, 142 ; Sharp v. Rheil, S5 
Mo. 97. 

acted or represented. In statute, Daly v. Palmer, 6 Blatchf. 

264. 

the duties. In statute. Queen v, Edye, 12 Q. B. 936. 

— of navigation. Inbill of lading. The Mohawk, 8 Wall. 153. 

— of rivers. In insurance policy. Citizens' Ins. Co. z/. Glasgow, 9 
Mo. 411. 

— cf the lakes. In marine policy, Matthews z/. Howard, 11 N. Y.9. 

— of the river. In bill of lading. Collier v, Valentine, 1 1 Mo. 299; 



PEBFOBMING 
FEBIIiS. 



Garrison v. Ins. Co., 19 How. 312 ; Jones v. Pitcher, 3 Stew. & P. 

135. 

of the sea. In bill of lading. Van Syckel v. The Ewing, Cnibbe, 



495 ; Laurence v, Minturn, 17 How. 100 ; The Portsmouth, 2 Biss. 
56; The Milwaukee Belle, 2 Biss. 197 ; Nemours v, Vance, 19 How. 
162 ; Crosby v. Fitch, 12 Conn. 410 ; The Costa- Rica, 3 Sawy. 538 ; 
Speyer v. The Mary Belle Roberts, 2 Sawy. i ; The Miletus, 5 
Blatchf. 335 ; The Mohawk, 8 Wall. 153 ; The Edwin, i Sprague, 
477; Bulkleyz/. Naumkeak Cotton Co., i Cliflf. 222; 24 How. 386; 
The Compta, 4 Sawy. 375; The Northern Belle, 1 Biss. 529; 
Dupontde Nemours v, Vance. 19 How. 162 ; The Reeside, 2 Samn. 
567 ; Patrick v, Hallett, i Johns. 241 ; The Gold Hunter. Blatchfl 
300 ; Gage v, Terrell, 9 Allen, 307. 

In bond, U. S. v. Dixy, 3 Wash. C. C. 1 5. 

of the sea. In insurance policy, Fletcher v, Inglis, 2 B. & Aid. 

316; Slater t/. Hayward Rubber Co., 26 Conn. 143; Union Ins. Co. 
V, Groom, 4 Bush, 293 ; Potter v, Suffolk Ins. Co., 2 Sumner, 197 ; 
Nelson v. Suffolk Ins. Co., 8 Cush. 477 ; Hazard v, Ins. Co., i Sum- 
ner, 218 ; 8 Peters, 557 ; Bellingham v, Clark, i B. & S. 336; lonides 
V. Universal Ins. Co., 14 C. B. (N. S.) 295 ; Lawrence v, Abendein. 
5 B. & Aid. no ; Koster v. Reed, 6 B. & C. 22 ; Tysen v. Moore, 56 
Barb. 442; Coles v. Marine Ins. Co., 3 Wash. 159; Fleming v. 



PERILS. 



263 



PERMITS. 



PEBIODICAL. 



SEBIL8— Continued. 

Marine Ins. Co., 4 Whart. 59 ; Washington Mut. Ins. Co. v. Reed, 
20 Ohio St. 199; Peters v, Warren Ins. Co., 14 Peters, 99; Plaisted 
V, Boston, etc., Nav. Co.. 27 Me. 132 ; Dent v. Smith, 10 B. & S. 
251 ; Gabay v, Lloyd, 3 B. & C. 793 ; Sherwood v. General Mut. Ins. 
Co., 1 Blatchf. 251 ; Anthony z/. ^tna Ins. Co., i Abb. (U. S.) 343 

In statute. State v, Strauss, 49 Md. 294. 

payments. In statute. Re Cox, 9 Ch. Div. 159; re Griffith, 12 

Ch. Div. 655. 

jr w wTBHABLB, In statute, Webster v. Peck, 31 Conn. 495. 

goods. In insurance policy, Robinson v. Commonwealth Ins. 

Co., 3 Sumner, 223. 

In statute, Henister v, Friedman, 5 Pa. L. J. 147 ; Fisk v. Spring, 14 
Cent. L. J. 121. 

property. In contract, Illinois, etc.. R. Co. v, McClellan, 54 

111. 58. 

In will, Dugans v, Livingston, 15 Mo. 231. 

artioles in their own nature. In insurance policy, Astor v^ 

Union Ins. Co., 7 Cow. 202. 

Queen v, Tomlinson, L. R., i C. C. R. 49 ; U. S. v, Elliott, 3 Mason, 156 ; 
State V, Kirkpatrick, 32 Ark. 117; Nelson v. State, 32 Ark. 193; 
Hood V. State, 44 Ala. 81 ; Com. v. Powell, 2 Mete. (Ky.) 10; Coth- 
ran v. State, 39 Miss. 541 ; Hamm v, Wickline, 26 Ohio St. 81 ; 
Com. V, Smith, 11 Allen, 243; U. S. v, Babcock, 4 McLean, 113; 
State z/. Whittemore, 50 N. H. 245 ; U. S. v, Moore, 2 Lowell, 232 ; 
Henry v, Hamilton, 7 Blackf. 506; State v, Wakefield, 73 Mo. 554; 
Carpenters. State, 4 How. (Miss.) 163 (34 Am. Dec. 116). 

SNT. Haskell v, Madison University, 8 Barb. 174- 

abode. In statute. Turner v, Irwin, 78 111. 170. 

agent. In statute, Armstrong v, U. S., Gilpin, 420. 

policy. Baptist Church v, Brooklyn Fire Ins. Co., 28 N. Y. 153. 

sickness. In statute, Duke v, Cranshay, L. R., i C. P. 700. 

sidewalks. In statute. City of Lowell v, French, 6 Cush. 223. 

-^ solicitor. In contract. Elderton v. Emmens, 4 C. B. 480. 

X»BBMAirEN 



ygRMTBSIOy. 



In contract. Perry v. Wheeler, 12 Bush, 541. 

In statute, Newton v, Mahoney Co., 26 Ohio St. 316. 

established. In statute, Newton v, Commrs., 10 Otto, 549. 

located. In deed. Mead v. Ballard, 7 Wall. 290. 

not to be disturbed without the . In deed, McClanahan v. 

Schucker, 45 Mo. 280. 

Loosey v. Orser, 4 Bosw. 391. 

In contract, Bennett v. Kennedy, 7 Wend. 163. 

him to escape. In statute, Warberton v. Woods, 6 Mo. 8. 

r — swine to go upon any sidewalk. In statute. Com. v, Curtis, 
9 Allen, 266. 

the same. In deed. Plumb v, Jubbs, 41 N. Y. 443. 

as fbr as the ice will . In contract. Vanderslice v, Newton, 4 

N. Y. 130. 

In statute, Huzham v, Wheeler, 3 H. & C. 80. 

drunkenness. In statute. Warden v, Tye, 2 C. P. Div. 74. 



PERMITTED: 264 PERSON 



FEBMITTED. or BUftoed. In deed, Hobson v, Middleton, 6 B. & C. 295. 

PBBPETitATIOK. in the of burglary. In statute, Bissot v, SUte, 53 Ind. 

408. 

FBBFETBATOB. In statute. Philo v. Illinois, etc.. R. Co., 33 Iowa, 47. 

PEBFETUAL. Buooeasion. In charter, Fairchild v. Masonic Hall Assn.. 71 

Mo. 526 ; Scanlan v, Cranshaw, 5 Mo. (App.) 337. 

PBBPBTUrrr. Ould v. Washington Hospital, 5 Otto, 312. 

PEBSIST. in his claim. In statute, Godfrey v, Eames, i Wall. 317. 

PEBSISTED. in his endaaTors. In statute, Huidekoper v, Douglass, i Wash. 

C. C. 259. 

PEBSON. In statute. Douglas ?/. Mail Co.>4 Cal. 304; Sanders v, Olhausen, 51 

Mo. 163; State t/. Jackson, 51 Mo. 198; Proctor v, H. & St. Joe R. 
R., 64 Mp. 113; Connor v, C, R. I. & P. R. R., S9 Mo. 285 ; Schultz 
V. Pacific R. R., 36 Mo. 13; Rohback v. Pacific R. R., 43 Mo. 187; 
State V, Field, 49 Mo. 270; State v, Larrimore, 19 Mo. 391 ; Russe v. 
Clarenback, 61 Mo. 310; Cedar Co. t^. Johnson, 50 Mo. 225 ; Russell 
V, Taylor, 4 Mo. 550; 5 Mo. 244 ; People v. Rector of Trinity Church, 
22 N. Y. 44; Denny v. Smith, 18 N. Y. 567; Olcott v, loga R. R., 
20 N. Y. 210; re Fox, 52 N. Y. 530; Harrison v, Harrison, 36 N. 
Y. 543 ; Ruckman v. Pitcher, 20 N. Y. 9 ; Meech v. Stoner, 19 N. 
Y. 26; Rains v. City of Oshkosh, 14 Wis. 374; Savings Bk. «'. 
Nashua, 46 N. H. 389; Knox v. Protection Ins. Co., 9 Conn. 430 (25 
Am. Dec. i) ; Lindsey v, Rollaken, 32 Ark. 626 ; Shultz v, Sutter, 3 
Mo. (App.) 140; Tute V, James, 46 Vt. 60; People v. Croton Aque- 
duct Co., 5 Abb. Pr. 316; Martin v. State, 24 Tex. 61 ; Wallace v. 
Lawyer, 54 Ind. 501 ; Bartee v, Houston, etc., R. Co., 36 Tex. 648 ; 
U. S. V. Shawmux, 2 Sawyer, 364; Delamater v. Russell, 4 How. Pr. 
234; Leavitt ^. Cambridge, 120 Mass.; U. S. v, Amedy, 11 Wheat. 
392; Beaston z/. Farmers' Bk., 12 Peters, 102; U. S. v. Fox, 94 U. 
S. 315: State V. Herald, 9 Kans. 194; Bank v. Mandeville, i Cranch 
C. C. 552; Betts V. Menard, i 111. 395; R. Co. v. Keep, 22 III. 9; 
Cora. V, Phoenix Bk., 11 Mete. 129; Frostbury Mutual Co. v, Low- 
dermilk, 50 Md. 175; Com. v. Tewksbury, 11 Mete. 55; People v. 
Utica Ins. Co., 15 Johns. 353 (8 Am. Dec. 243); Fisher v, Horicon 
Ins. Co., 10 Wis. 354; Peter v, Cowie, 2 Q. B. Div. 134; Pharma- 
ceutical Soc. V, London Co., 4 Q. B. Div. 315; 5 Q. B. Div. 310; 
5 App. Cas. 857 ; Wheeler v. Gray. 4 C. B. (N. S.) 595 ; Eddleston 
V. Francis. 7 C. B, (N. S.) 568 ; King v, Fitzmaurice, i Jebb, 28 ; 
Douglass V. Queen, 13 Q. B. 84; U. S. v. Shaw Mux, 2 Sawyer, 
365; Madden 2/. Springfield, 131 Mass. 441 ; Dickie v. Boston, etc., 
R. Co., 131 Mass. 516. 

aggrieved. In statute. Morrow v. Wood, 57 Ala. i ; Masterson 

V, Gibson, 56 Ala. 57 ; Porter v. U. S., 2 Paine, 315 ; Graves' Cases, 
L. R., 4 Q. B. 715 ; ex parte Learoyd, 27 W. R. 277 ; re Woods. 11 
Ch. Div. 56 ; re Tucker, 12 Ch. Div. 308 ; re White, 14 Ch. Div. 71 ; 
King V. Justices, 3 B. & Adol. 938. 

by whose act or defb^iilt. In statute. Brown t^. Russell, L. R., 

3 Q. B. 251. 

desiring to proseoute the same. In statute. State v, Bael, 46 

Mo. 528. 

discovering. In statute. Rex v, Teasdale, 3 Esp. 68. 

enlisted for the navy. In statute, Wilkes v, Dingsman, 7 



How. 89. 



PERSON. 265 PERSONAL. 

— Continued. 

flrm, oompany« In statute, Jones ?/. Page, 44 Ala. 659. 

fbr whose immediate benefit it ia prosecuted. In statute, 
Laumier v, Francis, 23 Mo. 181 ; Gildersleeve v. Marline, 19 N. Y. 
321 ; Montgomery County Bk. v. Marsh, 7 N. Y. 481 ; Butler v, 
Patterson, 13 N. Y. 292 ; Howland v, Willets, 9 N. Y. 170. 

—in the naval forces of the United States. In statute. Re 
Bogert, 2 Sawyer, 407 ; 3 Ben. 257. 

— interested in the estate. In statute. Smith v, Phillips, 54 Ala. 
8 ; Phillips v. Smith, 62 Ala. 575. 

— interested in the matter. In statute, Hull v. McFarland, 2 C. 
B. (N. S.) 807 ; 3 Ben. 257. 

— living. In statute. La Farge v. Exchange Fire Ins. Co., 22 N. 
Y. 352. 

of color. In statute, U. S. v. La Coste, 2 Mason, 133 ; State v. 



d4 



Walters, 3 I red. (L.) 455. 

of kin to him. In statute. State v. Walton, 74 Mo. 285. 

or persons. In statute. Ingate v, Lloyd Austriaco, 4 C. B. (N. 

S.) 706 ; South Carolina R. Co. v, McDonald, 5 Ga. 531 ; Libbey v, 
Hodgdon, 9N. H. 394 ; Bushell v, Ins. Co., 15 S. & R. 173; Martin 
V, Branch Bk., 14 La. 415 ; United States Bk. v. Merchants' Bk., i 
Rob. (Va.) 573 ; Planters, etc., Bk. v. Andrews, 8 Port. (Ala.) 404 ; 
McQueen v. Middletown Man%. Co., 16 Johns. 5 ; Union Bk. v. U. 
S. Bk., 4 Humph. 369 ; Guardians v, Franklin, 3 C. P. Div. 377. 

or persons damnified. In statute. Duke of Somerset v. In- 
habitants, 4 B. & C. 171. 

or property. McCarthys. Guild, 12 Mete. 291. 

residing within the United Kingdom. In statute, Attorney- 
General V, Alexander, L. R., 10 Ex. 20. 

who has esoaped the assessor. In statute, Lehman v, Robin- 
son, 59 Ala. 220. 

who has paid money lost upon any game or wager. In 

statute. Harris v. Brooks, 56 Ala. 389. 

any . }In statute, Consociated Presb. Soc. v. Staples, 23 Conn. 

559 ; Smith v. Congregational Soc., 23 Conn. 637 ; Sanborn v. Murphy, 
50 N. H. 65. 

having upon or about his . In statute. State v, Wilforth, 74 

Mo. 528. 

Kirtland v. Tart, 39 Conn. 107. 

action. In statute. Dewey v. Fifield, 2 Wis. 80. 

baggage. Connolly v. Warren, 106 Mass. 146 (8 Am. Rep. 300). 

chattels. In statute. Brenton v, Griffiths, 2 C. P. Div. 213. 

credit. In statute. Way v. Peck, 47 Conn. 23. 

estate* In contract. Bk. v. Hulburt, 22 Hun, 310. 

In statute. Farmers' Loan, etc., Co. v. Mayor, 7 Hill, 261 ; Curtiss v. 
Hoytt, 19 Conn. 155. 

In will. Beatty v. Judy, i Dana, 102. 

estate and eflbots. Buckland v, Papellon, L. R., i Eq. Cas. 477. 

estate, property, chattels and effbcts. In will. Jones v. 

Robinson, 3 C. P. Div. 345. 
expenses. In contract, Moore v. Remington, 34 Barb. 427. 



PERSONAL. 266 PERSONS 

— Continued. 

goods. In bill of lading. The Elvira Harbeck. 2 Blatchf. 356. 

In statute, U. S. v, Murray, i Cranch C. C. 141 ; U. S. v. Moulton, 
5 Mason, 537 ; U. S. v, Davis, 5 Mason, 356 ; U. S. v. Mazon, 5 
Blatchf. 361. 

luggage. In statute. U. S. v. The Anna, 2 Am. L. Reg. 421. 

omamentB. In will. Willis v. Curtois, i Beav. (Rolls.) 189. 

property. Stirman v. Cravens, 33 Ark. 376 ; Southern Life Ids. 

Co. V, Cole, 4 Fla. 359 ; Brownell v. Dixon, 37 111. 197 ; Leonard v- 
Laurence, 32 N. J. (L.) 355 ; Stief v. Hart, i N. Y. 20. 

In constitution, Williamson v, Harris, 57 Ala. 41. 

In statute. Cummings v, Cummings, 51 Mo. 261 ; Town of Paris v. 
Farmers* Bk., 30 Mo. 575 ; Fling v, Coodall, 40 N. H. 219 ; Turner 
V, State, I Ohio St. 4it ; Sherwood v, Sherwood, 32 Conn, i ; Chil- 
cote V. Conley, 36 Ohio St. 545 ; Butler v. Baber, $4 Cal. 178 ; Gal- 
latin Co. V, Beattie, 3 Montana, 173. 

In will. Johnson v, Goss, 128 Mass. 433. 

property oonsistixig of money and olothes. In will. Dean v, 

Gibson, L. R., 3 Eq. Cas. 713. 

property, estate and eflbota. In will. Belaney v, Belaney, L. 

R., 2 Ch. App. 139. 

property not capable of inannal delivery. In statute, Ra- 

ventas v. Green, 57 Cal. 254. 

property of every kind. In deed. Kendall v. Almy, 2 Sumner, 

278. 

representative. Hagen v. Kean, 3 Dill. 124; Jones v, Tainter, 



15 Minn. 512 ; Anderson v, Austin, 34 Barb. 319. 

In will. Gryirs Trusts, L. R., 6 Eq. Cas. 589 ; re Best, L. R., 18 Eq. 
Cas. 687. 

securities. Gee v. Alabama, etc., Ins. Co., 13 Ala. (N. S.) 581. 

service. In statute. Moyer v. Cook, 12 Wis. 336. 

transaction. In statute. Re Page, 6 Alb. L. J. 126 ; Howell v. 

Taylor, 18 N. Y. (S. C.) 214. 

all other, the ^^- estate whatsoever. In deed, Harrison v. Black- 
bum, 17 C. R (N. S.) 690. 

great injury. Green v. State, 29 Miss. 638. 

TEBBONAUiY. Campbell v. Upton, 113 Mass. 67. 

acquainted with. In notaries* certificate, Kelly v. Calhoun, $0 

Otto, 710. 
serve. In statute, Westfall z/. Farrell, 13 Wis. 512; Adams r. 



Wright, 14 Wis. 409. 

— served. In statute, Dunkle v, Elston, 71 Ind. 585. 



know . In certificate of notary, Kelly 1/. Calhoun, 5 Otto, 7101 

PEEtSONATE. In statute. Queen v, Hague, 4 B. & S. 720. 

any person entitled to vote. In statute. Whiting v. Chappell. 

9 B. & S. 1019. 

PEB80KS. In constitution, Ins. Co. v. City of New Orleans, i Woods, 85. 

In statute. City of St Louis v, Rogers, 7 Mo. 20 ; Cook v, Leonard, 6 
B. & C. 358; re Glover, L. R., 17 Eq. Cas. 121 ; Doane v, Clinton,! 
Utah, 417. 



FEjRSOJVS. 



267 



PIRACY. 



PERSONS — Continued 

and aaaooiatioiis. In statute, Parker Mills v. Comm'rs of Taxes, 

23 N. Y. 242. 

olaimiTig through or under the bankrupt. In statute, Pen- 



nell V, Walker, 18 C. B. 652. 

— drawing firewood for their own ftmily use. In statute, 
Wooster v. Van Vechten, 10 Johns. 467. 

— having the care of the promisee. In statute, Du ke of Somer- 
set V, Inhabitants, 4 B. & C. 171. 

— in the naval servioe of the United States. In statute. Ex 
parte Reed, 10 Otto, 21. 

— of oolor. In statute, Johnson v. Town of Norwich, 29 Conn. 



407. 



others to enlist. In statute. Respublica v, Robert, i Dall. 39. 



PSBSXJADINa. 

PEBTKNENCIA. 

PEBVEBSE. — 

PETrnOK. In statute, Bergen v, Jones, 4 Mete. 376. 



U. S. V, Castellero, 2 Black, 17. 
▼erdiot. Harrison v. Fane, i Man. & G. 554. 



PETBOIiEUM. In statute, Jones v. Cook, L. R., 6 Q. B. 505. 

loss arising firom . In insurance policy, Ins. Co. v. Express Co., 

5 Otto, 227. 

PFATIMACEUTICAI*. ohemist. In statute, Reg. v. Society, 5 El. & Bl. 1 58. 

PHKaOSOFHICAL. or philanthropic purposes. In will, Rotch v, Emerson, 

105 Mass. 431. 

PHOTOGitAFH. original . In statute. Ex parte Walker, 10 B. & S. 691. 

PHYSICIAN. — 



PICKHra. 
PICTUBE. 



in attendanoe. In insurance policy, Gibson v. Am. Mut. Life 

Ins. Co., 37 N. Y. 580. 

pretend to be a . In statute, Pedgrift v. Chevalier. 8 C. B. (N. 

S.) 240 ; 8 C. B. (N. S.) 247. 
her pooket. In information. State v. Wilson, 30 Conn. 500. 



In statute. U. S. v, Williams, 3 Fed. Rep. 484. 

of land. In will. Josh v. Josh, 5 C. B. (N. S.) 465. 



PIEB. 



FHiFEB. 



PHiOT. 



In statute, Reg. z/. Leith, i El. & Bl. 137 ; Stevens t/. Rhinelander, 5 
Robt- 285. 

PIGEON-DBOFPEB. In statute. State v. Newton, 59 Ind. 173. 

PIG^mON. In contract, Mackenzie v, Dunlop, 8 Macq. H. L. Cas. 26. 

neoessary or nuisanoe. In statute, Norris v. Smith, 10 Ad. & 

El. 188. 

Becket v, Sterrett, 4 Blackf. 499. 

Rex V. Beardmore, 2 Burrow, 792. 

In statute, Peake v. Screech, 7 Q. B. 610. 

. master or mariners. In contract, Zung v, Howland, 5 Daly, 

136; Guillaume v, Hamburg, etc., Packet Co., 42 N. Y. 212. 

In statute. Bensusan v. Murphy, 14 Blatcjif. 536. 

In contract. Washing Machine Co. v. Earle. 3 Wall. Jr. 321. 

U. S. V, Smith, 5 Wheat. 153; Davison v. Sealskins, 2 Paine, 324; U. 
S. V, Hutchings, 2 Wheeler C. C. 543 ; Dole v. New England Ins. 
Co., 2 CliflF. 394 ; U. S. v. Jones, 3 Wash. 209 ; U. S. v. Tully, i Gall. 
247 ; U. S. V. Palmer, 3 Wheat. 610 ; U. S. v, Klintock, 5 Wheat. 144 ; 
U. S. V, Pirates, 5 Wheat. 184. 

In statute. Re Tivnan, 5 B. & S. 645 ; U. S. v. Baker, 5 Blatchf. 6. 



PTRATE. 



268 



PLACE, 



PIBATE. 



PIBATICAI.. 



FIRATICAIJ.Y. 



FISCABIA. 
FISTOI.. 



FITCH-FINE. 



FLACE. 



Davison v. Sealskins, 2 Paine, 324 ; U. S. v, Tully, i Gall. 247. 

In statute, U. S. v, Howard, 3 Wash. C. C. 340. 

flHHBlling thieveB. Jn insurance policy. Dole v. New England, 

etc., Ins. Co., 2 Cliff. 395. 

aggresBiong. In statute, U. S. v. Smith, 5 Wheat 153 ; U. S. v. 

The Malek Adhel, 2 How. 210. 

and felonionaly run away with any ship or veaseL 1% 

statute. U. S. v, Tully, i Gall. 247. 

« 

Moulton V, Libby, 37 Me. 472. 

In statute, Fife v. State, 31 Ark. 455 ; Hutchinson v. State, 62 Ala. 3; 
Atwood V, State, 53 Ala. 509 ; Evins v. State, 46 Ala. 88 ; State v, 
Duzan, 6 Blackf. 31. 

timber of average quality. In contract, Jones v, Clarke, 2 

Hurl. & N. 725. 

In statute, Eastwood v. Miller, L. R., 9 Q. B. 440; Haigh v. Town 
Council, L. R., 10 Q., B. 102 ; Rice v, Slee, L. R., 7 C. P. 378; Hull 
Dock Co. V, Priestly, 4 B. & Ad. 192; Young 7/. Gattridge, L. R.,4 
Q. R 166; Queen v, Edmundson, 2 El. & El. 84; Cliquot's Champagne, 
3 Wall. 114; U. S. V, Bevans, 3 Wheat. 336; Salt Co. v, Wilkinson, 
8 Blatchf. 30; Clapp v, Burlington, 42 Vt. 579; Law ?/. Fairfield, 
46 Vt. 425 ; State v. Hart, 31 N. J. (L.) 434 ; State v, Haight, 31 
N. J. (L.) 399; State v, McNally, 34 Me. 210; U. S. v. La Coste, 2 
Mason, 133 ; Salt Co. v, Wilkinson, 8 Blatchf. 38 ; Smith v. Redding, 
L. R., I Q. B. 489; Preston v, Buckley, L. R., 5 Q. B. 391 ; Shawt>. 
Morley, L. R., 3 Ex. 137. 

for slaughtering horses. In statute, Colaln v. Hall, L. R.. 6 

Q. R 206. 

fbr water. In statute, Hipkins v, Birmingham Gas Co., s Hurl 

A N. 75 ; 6 Hurl. & N. 250. 

haying a known and defined boundary. In statute. Queen 9. 

Ralefayer, L. R., i Q. B. 112. 

not being a patent theater. In statute, Fredericks v, Payne, 



I H. & C. 585. 

— of abode. In statute, Melbourne v, Greenfield, 7 C. R (N. S.) 
17; Mason v. Bibby, 2 H. & C. 881. 

— of amusement. In statute. Warner v, Brighton Aquarium. L 



R., 10 Ex. 291. 

of business. Bank of Columbia -z/. Laurence, i Pet $78 ; Ste- 



phenson V, Primrose, 8 Port. 155 (33 Am. Dec. 281); Little v. Cam- 
bridge, 9 Cush. 298; Rhodes v, Salem Turnpike, 98 Mass. 95; 
Palmer?/. Kelleher, in Mass. 320; Barre Bk. v, Hingham Man%. 
Co., 127 Mass. 567. 

« 

In statute, Baird v. State, 38 Tex. 599; Lewis v, Davis, 8 Daly, 185. 

of destination. In statute, Attwood v. Case, i Q. B. Div. 134- 

In contract, Ayers v. Western Co., 14 Blatchf. 9 ; Southern Ex. C^. v. 
Crook, 44 Ala. 468. 

of dramatio entertainment. In statute, Russell v. Smith, 12 

Q. B. 217 ; Lee v, Simpson, 3 C. R 880. 

of public resort. In statute. Re Davis, 2 Hurl. & N. 149: 

Sewell V, Taylor, 7 C. B. (N. S.) 161 ; Fredericks v, Payne, i H. k 
C. 584. 



PLACE. 



269 



PLEAS. 



PLAGE — Continued. 



— of publication. In statute. Ricketts v, Hyde Park, 85 111. no. 

— out. In statute. Queen v. Inhabitants, 11 Ad. & Ell. 657 ; King 
V, Inhabitants, 8 B. & C. 95. 

— where Buoh businesa is carried on. In statute, U. S. v. 



PLACED. 
PLACES. 
PLAIN. 



Boecker, 21 Wall. 652. 

other . In statute, Daggett v, Catterns» 17 C. B. (N. S.) 670; 19 

C. B. (N. S.) 766 ; Bows v. Fenwick, L. R., 9 C. P. 339. 

usual of business. In statute. Palmer v, Kelleher, 1 1 1 Mass. 321 

elected or chosen. In statute. Queen v, Humphrey, 10 Ad. & 



Ell. 361. 

In statute. Queen v. Backhouse, 7 B. & S. 921 ; Rex v. Hall, i R & 
C. 238 ; U. S. V, Tierney, i Bond, 572. 

adequate and complete remedy at law. In statute. Bean v. 

Smith, 2 Mason, 270. 

English type. In statute. Porter v, GJlkey, 57 Mo. 235. 

statement. In statute, Mann v, Morewood, 5 Sandf. 557 ; 



Comm'rs v, Pender, 79 N. C. 524. 

PTiA \ NTJJ?'J?'. Brents v. Barnett, 4 Bibb, 251 ; Bank of Salina v, Henry, i Hill, 555; 

5 Hill, 523. 

/// statute. King v. Lane, 7 Mo. 242 ; Wescott v. Booth, 49 Ala. 182. 

PLANTS. and vegetable productions. In statute. Rex t/. Hodges, i M. 

6 M. 344. 

PLANTATION. Attorney-General v. Judges, 38 Cal. 291 ; Stowe v, Davis, 10 Ired. 

(L.) 431 ; Cone v, Roxbury, 9 Gray, 485. 

In statute. State v, BIythe, 3 McCord, 363; Sanderlin v. State, 2 
Humph. 315. 

supplies. In statute, Herman v, Perkins, 52 Miss. 813 ; Cook v, 

Lyon, 54 Miss. 368 ; Wright v, Walton, 56 Miss. i. 

my . In will, Bradshaw v. Ellis, 2 Dev. & B. (Eq.) 686 (32 Am. 

Dec. dZd), 

for the purpose of . In statute. East Haven v. Hemingway, 

7 Conn. 186. 

Wilhite V, Barr. (i^ Mo. 284. 
PIiATFOBM. In commitment. Re Davis, 2 Hurl. & N. 149. 

peepabo. In letter. State v, Avery, 7 Conn. 266 (18 Am. Dec. 

105). 



PLANnNQ*. 
PUSlT. 



PLAYS. 
PXiEA* 

PUSAD. 
PIiKADEB. 



at any game. In statute, Ansley v. State, 36 Ark. 68. 

In statute. Ex parte Attorney-General, 53 Cal. 246. 

Neave v, Avery, 16 C. B. 335 ; State v, Ryan, 2 Mo. (App.) 303. 

In rule of court, Cutts v, Lunedge, 9 Q. B. 1022. 

issuably. Barkers. Gleadon, 5 Dowl. 136. 



In statute, Campbell v, Perkins, 8 N. Y. 430. 

State *v. Ryan, 2 Mo. (App.) 303. 

, In rule of court, Edden v. Ward, 12 Ad. & Ell. 429. 

In statute, Johnson v, Laughlin, 7 Kas. 359 ; Com. v, Lockwood» 109 
• Mass. 331. 

PlaEADINGS. Desnoyer v. Hereux, i Minn. 17. 

all — - of personal actions. In statute, Stuart v. Jones, i El. & Bl. 22. 



PLEASURE. 



270 



POOR. 



FI^BASUBS. 



]PLOW. 
PIiITNDEB. 



PIiYINa. 



POCKET. 
POINT. 



POINTED, 
i POISON. 

POISONING. 



POIJGE. 



P0IJ07. 



POOIlL 

POOB. 



oaniage. Moss v, Moore, 18 Johns. 128 -, 19 Johns. 442; 

Middlesex Tp. Co. v, Wentworth, 9 Conn. 371 ; Talcott Mountain 
Tp. Co. V. Marshall, 11 Conn. 185. 

for and during their . In deed. Cole v. Lake Co., S4 N. H. 242. 

Doak v» Bank of the State, 6 I red. (L.) 309; Thompson v* Andrews, 8 
Jones (N. C), 453 ; Brown v, ^Bement, 8 Johns. 98 ; Wood v. Dud- 
ley, 8 Vt. 435 ; First Nat Bk. v. Nelson, 38 Ga. 391 ; Folticr v, 
Schroder, 19 La. Ann. 17 ; Walcott v, Keith, 22 N. H. 196 ; Bousey 
V, Amee, 8 Pick. 236 ; Payne v. Bensley, 8 Cal. 260; Brewster v. 
Hartley, 37 Cal. 1 5. 

shovel . In indictment. State i/. Sansom, 3 Brev. N. C. $. 

Carters v, Andrews, 16 Pick, i ; U. S. v. Pitman, i Sprague, 196. 

for hire. In statute, Blackpool Local Bd. t/. Bennett, 4 Hurl. 

& N. 128 ; Blackpool Local Bd. v» Kenyon, 4 Hurl. & N. 133. 

work or navigate. In statute. Queen v, Tibbie, 4 El. & BL 



888, 
In statute. Walker v, Evans, 2 El. & El. 359. 

for hire. In statute, Allen v, Tunbridge, L. R., 6 C. P. 481 ; 

Clarke v, Stanford, L. R., 6 Q. B. 357 ; Case v. Storey, L. R, 4 Ex. 

319. 
the of. In indictment. Com. v, Sherman, 105 Mass. 170U 

In statute. Daniels v, R. Co., 3 Wall. 230. 

sooh . In contract. Black v, U. S., i Otto, 267. 

oat. In statute, Deenehey v, Woodson, 100 Mass. 195. 



In statute. Berry, v, Henderson, L. R., 5 Q. B. 296 ; People «r. Van* 
Deleer, 53 Cal. 147. 

a horse. In libel, Glines v. Smith, 48 N. H. 259. 

Laythain v, Agnew, 70 Mo. 48. 

Board v. Western Trans. Co., 6 Greg. 222. 

ofioer. Com. v. Smith, 1 1 1 Mass. 407. 

power. Town of Lake View v. Rose Hill Cemetery, 70 IIL 191 ; 

Com. V, Alger, 7 Cush. 84 ; Thorpe v, Rutland, etc, R. Co.» 27 Vt. 
149; City of New York v, Miln, 11 Pet. 102. 

^ pnrpoees. Sessions v, Crunkelton, 20 Ohio St. 349* 

-- — ofinsoranoe. Manny v. Dunlap, i Woolw. 372. 

of the law. In statute, Tioga Co. v. South Creek Tp., 75 Pa. 



St. 433. 
any . In statute, Hudson v, Ins. Co., 7 El. & Bl. 40. 

playing . Wilkenson v. Gill, 74 N. Y. 63 (30 Am. Rep. 264). 

Kilboume v, Thompson, 23 Alb. L. J. 227. 

Potter V, Chicago, etc., R Co., 22 Wis. 616. 

In statute. State v, Osawkee Tp., 14 Kas. 41 S- 

In will, Attorney-General v, Northumberland, 7 Ch. Div. 745. 

children. In will. Dashiell v, Attorney-General, 5 H. & J. 39a 

(9 Am. Dec. 572). 
inhabitants. /// will, Attorney-General v, Clarke, Amb. Ch. 



371. 

— kinsmen and kinswomen. In will. Attorney-General v. 

Price. 17 Ves. 371. 

— relations. In will, McNeilledge v, Gkilbraitb, 8 S. & R. 43 (ll 



Am. Dec. 572); Brown v. Higgs, 4 Vesey, 708. 



POOREST. 



271 



POSSESSION. 



hi will, Atty.-Gen. v, Northumberland, 7 Ch. Div. 745. 

FOBGELAIN. ohuia» ajid parian ware. In statute, Arthur v, Jzcoby, 13, 

Otto, 678. 

FOBT. Queen v. Dock Co., 7 Q. B. i ; U. S. v. Morel, 13 Am. Jur. 279 ; Gray 

V. Gardner, 17 Mass. 188. 

In insurance policy. Cockey v, Atkinson, 2 B. & Aid. 460. 

In statute. Kites v. Case, i B. &C. iq6 ; De Longuemere v. New York 
Ins. Co., 10 Johns, 120; De Longuemere v. Firemen's Ins. Co., 10 
Johns. 126; Patrick ^. Commercial Ins. Co., 11 Johns. 9; Simpson 
V, Pacific Mut. Ins. Co., i Holmes, 136; Farrand «/. Cooper, 12 C. 
B. (N. S.) 330; Dock Co. V, Browne, 2 B. A Ad. 43; Ayer v, 
Thacher, 3 Mason, 123; Hull Dock Co. v, Priestley. 4 B. & Adol. 
192. % 

of Boston. In statute. Martin v. Hilton, 9 Mete. 371 ; Young v. 

The Orpheus, 119 Mass. 185. 

of deliTory. The Two Catherines, 2 Mason, 319. 

of deatinatioii. In insurance policy, Washington Ins. Co. v. 

White, 103 Mass. 239; Gookin v. New England, etc., Ins. Co., 12 
Gray, 501. 

of diaoharge. In insurance policy* Bramhall v. Sun Mut. Ins. 



PORTABLE. 
FOBTIOK. 

FOBTS. 



Co., 104 Mass. 510 (6 Am. Rep. 261). 

In bill of lading. Knell v, U. S. Steam Co., 33 N. Y. (S. C.) 423. 

of Falmouth. Smith v. Swift, 8 Mete. 329. 

of lading. In insurance policy. Brown v, Tay leur, 4 Ad. & EIL 

241. 

ofltiabon. In charter-party. Goddard v, Bulow, i N. & Me. 

45. 

of loading. In insurance policy. Equitable Ins. Co. i/. Heame^ 

20 Wall. 494; Hanover v, Hutchinson, L. R., 4 Q. B. 523; L. R., 5: 
Q. B. S84. 
of Kew Orleans. In insurance policy. Mobile Marine Ins. Co» 



V, McMillan, 27 Ala. 77. 
riak. In insurance policy. Nelson v. Sun Mut. Ins. Co., 71 N. Y. 

453. 

home . White's Bk. v. Smith, 7 Wall. 646. 

In deed, Goflfv. Pope, 83 N. C. 123. 

Holly z^. State, 54 Ala. 238. 

In indictment. Holly v. State, S4 Ala. 238. 

and havens. Paine ?/. Woods, 108 Mass. 169. 

an the property I . In will, Jones v, Sasser, i Dev. & B. 4$^* 

of. In will, Hemingway v, Hemingway, 22 Conn. 462. 

pedis. Porter v, Kennedy, i McMull. 357. 



Tredwell v, Reddick, i Ired. (L.) 56 ; Williams t'. Buchanan, i Ired. (L.) 
535 ; Redfield z'. Utica, etc., R. Co., 25 Barb. 54; Baconv. Sheppard^ 
II N. J. (L.) 197 ; Sanford v. Pierce, 126 Mass. 146. 

In contract, Tilly v. Thomas, L. R., 3 Ch. (App.) 61. 

In statute. Rex v. Rowley, i Russ. & Ry. no; Queen z/. St. Giles, 2 
Q. B. 447; Sepulveda v, St. Giles, 39 Cal. 13 ; Kimbro v, Hamilton^ 
28 Tex. 560; Lofton z^. Cobb, i Jones (L.), 406 ; Stephens z/. Leach^ 
19 Pa. St. 262 Robinson v. Douglass, 2 Aiken, 364; Reed v. Field, 



POSSJESS/OA'. 272 POWER 



POSSESSION — Continued. 

15 Vt. 672; State V, Washburn, 11 Iowa, 245; Pegiam v, Carson, 
10 Bosw. 505. 

of any person. In statute. Six hundred and fifty-one Ciiesta of 

Tea V, U. S., i Paine, 499. 

of the premiseB. In statute, Sanford v. Pierce, 126 Mass. 146. 

order or disposition. In statute, Storer v. Hunter, 3 E & C. 



377 ; Greenway v, Clark, 4 B. & C. 318. 
reversion or remainder. In statute. May v. Slaughter, 3 



Marsh. 508. 

actual . Bynum v. Carter, 4 I red. (L.) 310; Wolf r. Ament, i 

Grant's Cas. 150. 

. actual In statute, Davis v. Spring Valley Waterworks, 57Cal. 

543- 
agent intrusted with the of goods. In statute, Heyman v. 

Flewker, 13 C. B. (N. S.) 520. 

apparent . In statute, Barrow v. Bell, 5 El. & Bl. 540; Gough 

V, Evered, 2 H. & C. 10. 

change of . Sims v, Sims, 8 Port. 449 (33 Am. Dec. 293). 

delivery of . Sims v, Sims, 8 Port. 449 (33 Am. Dec. 293). 

found in his . In statute, Hoshaw v. Gullett, 53 Mo. 208. 

having in . In statute. State v. Potter, 42 Vt. 495. 

immediate right of . In statute, Campau v, Campau, 19 Mich. 

116. 
in . In will, Martelli v, Holloway, L-. R. 5 H. L. 533. 

uninterrupted — — . Reed v, Earnhart, 10 Ired. (L.) 516. 

POSSIBIUTY. of profit. In statute. Schon die r t/. Wace, i Camp. 487- 

POSSIBLE. as Ihr as without expense. In contract, Herand v. Leaf. S 

C. B. 160. 

as soon as . In insurance policy, Mann v. Western Ass. Co., 19 

U. C. Q. B. 314; Cammell v. Beaver, etc., Ins. Co., 39 U. C. Q. B. i. 
POSTERITY. In will. Breckenridge v, Denny, 8 Bush. 523. 

POST-NOTES. Hogg's Appeal, 22 Pa. St. 479. 

POST-OBIT. bond. Chesterfield v, Jameson, 2 Ves. 157. 

POST-OFFICE. In statute, U. S. v, Marselis, 2 Blatchf 108 ; U. S. v, Nott i Mc- 
Lean, 506. 

POST-OFFICES. and post-roads. In statute. Ex parte Jackson, 6 Otto, 727- 

POSTPONE. Hager v, Danforth, 8 How. Pr. 448 ; Shufelt v. Power, 13 How. Pr. 89- 

In statute. Bispham v. Tucker, Penn. (N. J.) 253. 
POST-BOAD. In statute. Railway Mail Service Cases, 13 Ct. of CI. 199. . 
POST-BOUTE. In statute. Railway Mail Service Cases, 13 Ct. of CI. 199. 

POSTS. depots and stations. In contract, Caldwell's Case. 19 Wall. 264. 

POuJMiJ. town . In deed. Wooley v, Groton, 2 Cush. 305. 

POUin)S. sterling. In certificate. Schermerhom v. Talmand, 14 N. Y. 93- 

POWDER. magazine. Harley v, Herl, 2 Cal. 282. 

POWEB. In plea, Hallewell v, Morrell, i Man. & G. 367. 

and authority. In statute. County Comm'rs v. Duckett, 20 Md. 

468. 

ooupled with interest. Hunt v, Rousmaniere, 2 Mason. 249! ^ 

Wheat. 20"^ ; Wilson v, Troup, 2 Cow. 196. 



PO WER. 273 PREFERRED 



^VTER — Continued . 

of revooation. In statute. Doe v. Hawkins; 2 Q. B. 212. 

not within the . In statute. Barton v, Merriam, 27 Mo. 235 ; 

Pope V, Mooney, 40 Mo. 104. 
PBACTICABIaE. In statute. U. S. v. Wise, 7 Fed. Rep. 190. 

as noar the court-houae as . In contract. Wooters v^ Interna- 
tional R. Co., S4 "^ex* 294. 

as nearly unifbrm as . In constitution. State z/. Supervisors, 

25 Wis. 339. 

as soon afterward as . In insurance policy. Parsons v. Queen 

Ins. Co., 43 U. C. Q. B. 271. 

as speedily as . In statute. State v. School Directors, 74 Mo. 23. 

PBACnCABIiY. Streeterz/. Streeter, 43 111. 155. ^ 

FBACnCAIa. looation. Hubbell v. McCulloch, 47 Barb. 287. 

FBACnCAIaLY. In statute. Gardner v. Cowles, 3 Ch. Div. 305. 

FBACfnCE. Allen v. Smillie, i Abb. Pr. 354 ; Raymond v. Danbury, etc., R. Co., 

14 Blatchf. 133. 

In statute. Attorney-Gen. v. Silleen, 10 H. L. Cas. 704. 

as an apotheoary. In statute. Apothecaries Co. v. Greenwood, 

2 B. A Ad. 708. 

medicine. In statute. Anthe v. State, 6 Tex. (App.) 202. 

physio. College of Physicians v. Rose, 6 Mod. 44. 

pleadings and forms and modes of prooeeding. In stcUute. 



Nuddt/. Barrows, i Otto, 426; Beardsleyz'. Littell, 14 Blatchf. 104; 
Indianapolis R. R. v. Horst, 3 Otto, 291; Sage v. Tauszky, 6 Cent. 
L. J. 7. 

PBAUTlUJiiS. In statute. Ex parte Delaney, 43 Cal. 480 ; Barber v. Gamson, 4 B. & 

Aid. 287. 

law. In constitution. State v. Marks, 30 La. Ann. 97. 



other fraudulent, swindling or deoeitftil . In statute. State 

V. Sumner, 10 Vt. 587 (33 Am. Dec. 219). 

PRA.OT1UJUNG. In statute. Ex parte Read, i B. & Ad. 957. 

medicine or healing the siok. In statute. Macon v. State, 4 

Humph. 421. 
PRATRIE. land. In statute. Tracks v. St. L. A I. M. R. R., 58 Mo. 15. 

or timber land. In statute. Brunell v. Hopkins, 42 Iowa, 429. 

PREACHERS. of Christ's holy gospel. In will. Shore v. Wilson, 9 CI. & 

Fin. 355 ; Attorney-Gen. v. Dmmmond, i Dr. & War. 353 ; 2 H. L. 
Cas. 837. 

PHECAEUCOUS. Shields v. Shields, 60 Barb. 56. 

Simpson v. Robert, 35 Ga. 181. 

In statute. Garcia v. State, 5 Tex. (App.) 340 ; Tuttle v. State, 6 Tex. 
(App.) 556. 

Adams t/. Vose, i Gray, 51; Webster v. Com., 5 Cush. 403. 

PBBdWCT. Brooks z/. Norris, 124 Mass. 172. 

Spencer v. Colt, 89 Pa. St. 314. 

In statute. Attorney-General v. Baker, 4 Hurl. & N. 20 ; Charlton 
V. Merrick, 4 App. Cas. 427 ; Braybrooke v. Attorney-General, 9 H. 
L. Cas. 1 50 ; Attorney-General v. Floyer, 7 Hurl. A N. 260. 

PBEFEBBED. In indictment. Reg. v. Albert, 5 Q. B. 41. 

35 



PREFERRED. 274 PREMISES. 

PBEFRRRWT) ~ Continued. 

diTidendfl. In certificate, St. John v. Erie Co., 10 Blatchf. 271. 

stock. Lockart v. Van Alstyne, 31 Mich. 76. 

In statute, Burt v. Rattle, 31 Ohio St. 1 16. 

indiotment is . In statute. Reg. v. Inhabitants, 3 Q. B. 900. 

FBEFSBSNOB. In statute. Clarion Bk. v, Jones, 21 Wall. 325 ; Wager v. Hall, 16 

Wall. 584. 

FBBGNAirr. Com. 7/. Brown, 14 Gray, 419. 

In indictment. Com. v, Parker, 9 Mete. 600. 

with a child. In will, Blakistonz/. Haslewood, 10 C. R 545. 

with child. In statute. State v, Howard, 32 Vt 380. 

woman. In statute, Eckhardt v. People, 22 Huiv 525. 

FBBJUDIGS. In statute. Com. v. Webster, 5 Cush. 296. 

of the judge. InstcUute. Western Bk. z/. Tallman, 15 Wis. 92. 

to the of thepardhaaer. In statute, Sandys v. Hall, 3 Q. R 

Div. 449 ; Hoyle v, Hitchman, 4 Q. B. Div. 233. 

without , English v, English, 12 C. E. Green, 579; Cochran v, 

Coufer, 2 Del. Ch. 27 ; Wanzer v. Self, 30 Ohio St 378 ; Burlen v. 
Shannon, 3 Gray, 387; Crews v. C leghorn, 13 Ind. 438 ; Brown v. 
Brown, 37 N. H. 536 ; Lang v. Waring, 25 Ala. 628; Fisktf. Parker, 
14 La. Ann. 491 ; Paddock v, Forrester, 3 Man. & G. 904 ; McKee 
V, Rogers, 30 Ark. 273 ; Denant v. Essex Co., 7 Wall. 107 ; Creigh- 
ton V, Kerr, 20 Wall. 8 ; Maginac v. Thomson, 15 How. 281. 

without to charter-party. In bill of lading, 406 Hogsheads 

of Tobacco, 4 Blatchf. 320. 

STATED. In statute. Bower v. State, 5 Mo. 364 ; Sullivan v. People, i 
Park. C. C. 347 ; State v, Ellis, 74 Mo. 221 ; State v, Lewis, 74 Mo. 
222 ; State v, Kotovsky, 74 Mo. 247 ; Lanergan v. People, 6 Park. 
C. C. 210; State V. Lopez, 15 Nev. 407. 

design. In statute. People v, Clark, 7 N.Y. 385 ; Hogan v. State, 

36 Wis. 226 ; McDaniel v. State, 8 S. & M. 401. 

Trull V, Eastman, 3 Mete. 121 ; Reg. v. Inhabitants, 5 Q. B. 489. 

In deed. Perry v, Davis, 3 C. B. (N. S.) 776 ; New Jersfey Zinc Co. v, 
Franklinite Co., 15 N. J. (Eq.) 418 ; Berry v. Billings, 44 Me. 416; 
Buddz/. Brooke, 3 Gill, 198; Farquharson v, Elichelberger, 15 Md. 
63; Holbrook v. Chamberlain, 116 Mass. 155; Fuller v. Davis, 4 
Duer, 187 ; Holbrook v. Debs, 99 111. 372. 

In insurance policy, Reid v. Ins. Co., 19 Hun, 284 ; Herriman v. Ins. 
Co., 45 N. Y. (S. C.) 394 ; Haughton v, Eubank, 4 Camp. 89 ; Prieger 
V, Exchange, etc., Ins. Co., 6 Wis. 91. 

In statute. State v. Jaeger, 63 Mo. 407 ; State v. Wyle, 55 Mo. 67; 
New Jersey Zinc Co. v, Franklinite Co.. 13 N. J. (Eq.) 322 ; Swant'. 
State, II Ala. 594 ; Sandy v. State, 60 Ala. 18 ; Pearce v. State, 40 
Ala. 720 ; Reg. v, I|bith. i El. & Bl. 137 ; Bowers v, Pomeroy, 21 Ohio 
St. 184; Salt Co. f. Wilkenson, 8 Blatchf 30; State v. Black, 9 Ired. 
378; Downman y. State, 14 Ala. 242 ; Amos v. Fond du Lac, 46 
Wis. 695. 

In will. Hemming V. Willetts, 7 C. B. 715. 

drunk or oonstiiiied on the . In statute. Cross v. Watts, 13 C. 

B. (N. S.) 240 ; Deal v, Schofield, L. R.. 3 Q- B. 9 ; 8 B. & S. 762. 



rn ■ ^^ 1 



PREPONDERANCE. 275 PRESENT. 

FBEPONDEBAIVOB. of eyidenoe. In instruction. Shinn v. Tucker, 37 Ark. 

581. 

of proof In instruction. Haskins v, Haskins, 9 Gray, 391. 

PBE8GBIBED. by law. Sloan v. Gibson, 4 Mo. 32 ; Exline v. Smith, 5 Cal. 

113. 

lixnitfl. In statute. Caswell v. Cook, 1 1 C. B. (N. S.) 649. 

when not Ibtind as in the oode. In constitution. People v. 

Colby, 54 Cal. 37. 

State V, Kansas, etc., R. Co., 45 Iowa, 139. 
In statute. Chenot v. Lefevre, 8 III. 637. 

made and signed by a regular practising physician. In 

statute. Carrington v. Com., 78 Ky. 83. 

or reoommendatlon of a graduated physioian. In statute. 

Thompson v. State, 37 Ark. 411. 

Hochreiter v. People, i Keyes, 66; Reg. v. Webb, 2 C. & K. 938. 

of any female. In statute. Brady v. State, 48 Ga. 311. 

in her . In statute. Henderson v. State, 63 Ala. 193. 

in the of the testator. In statute. Boldry v. Parris, 2 Cush. 

433; Watson V. Pipes, 32 Miss. 462 ; Gaylor's Appeal, 43 Conn. 82 ; 
Howard's Will, 5 T. B. Mon. 199 (17 Am. Dec. 60) ; Mandeville v. 
Parker, 31 N. J. (Eq.) 244; Graham v. Graham, 10 Ired. 219; Shires 
V. Glasscock, 2 Salk. 688 ; Dary v. Smith, 3 Salk. 395 ; 12 Mod. 37 ; 
Longford v. Eyal, i P. Wms. 740 ; Newton v. Clarke, 2 Curteis, 320 ; 
Todd V. Winchelsea, M. & M. 12 ; 2 C. & P. 488 ; 3 Russ. 441 ; Percy's 
case, I Rob. 278 ; Casson v. Dade, i Bro. C. C. 90 : Dick. 586 ; Trim- 
nell's case, 11 Jur. (N. S.) 248; Edleston v. Speake, Holt. 222; 3 
Mod. 259 ; Machall v. Temple, 2 Show. 288 ; Broderick v. Broderick, 
I P. Wms. 239; Clark v. Ward, i Bro. P. C. 137; Tribe v. Tribe, 13 
Jur. 793 ; I Robt. 775 ; Wright v. Manifold, i M. & S. 294 ; Ellis' 
case, 2 Curteis, 395 ; Colman'scase, 3 Curteis, 118; Norton z/. Bazett, 
Dea. & Sw. 259; Kiltick's case, 3 Sw. & Tr. 578 ; Violette v. Ther- 
riau, I Pug. & Bus. (N. B.) 389; Wright z/. Lewis, 5 Rich. 212; Ray 
V. Hill, 3 Strobh. 297 ; Tucker v. Oxner, 12 Rich. 141 ; Bynum v. 

■ Bynum, 11 Ired. 632 ; Cornelius v. Cornelius, 7 Jones, 593 ; Popet^. 
Picket, 51 Ala. 384; Moore v. Moore, 8 Gratt. 307 ; Sturdivant v. 
Birchett, 10 Gratt. 67 ; Nock v. Nock, 10 Gratt. 106 ; McElfresh v. 
Guard, 32 Ind. 408; Turner v. Cook, 36 Ind. 129; Bundy v. Mc- 
Knight, 48 Ind. 502 ; Mason v. Harrison, 5 H. & J. 480 ; Butler v. 
Benson, i Barb. 526 ; Ambre v. Weishear, 74 III. 109 ; Meurers'8 
case, 44 Wis. 392 ; Robinson v. King, 6 Ga. 539 ; Brooks v. Dufifell, 
23 Ga. 441 ; Reed v. Roberts, 26 Ga. 294 ; Lamb v. Girtman, 33 Ga. 
289; Reynolds v. Reynolds, i Spears. 253 ; Jones v. Tuck, 3 Jones, 
202 ; Orndorf v Hummer, 12 B. Mon. 619 ; Neil v. Neil, i Leigh, 6 ; 
Edelen v. Hardy, 7 H. & J. 61 ; Right v. Price, Doug. 241 ; Hudson 
V. Parker, i Rob. 24 ; McGuire v. Kerr, 2 Bradf. 244 ; Jackson v. 
Moore, 14 La. Ann. 213 ; Hall v. Hall, 18 Ga. 40 ; Aurand v. Wilt, 9 
Pa. St. 54. 

out of the of her husband. In statute. Deery v. Cray, 5 Wall. 

79S. 
In statute. Queen v. Rector, 8 Ad. & El. 357 ; Griffin v. Weatherby, 

9 B. & S. 726 ; Com. v. Keefe, 9^ Gray, 291. 
attending physioian. In will. Everett v. Carr. 59 Me. 325. 



PRESENT. 



276 



PRETENSE. 



PBESENTBD. 



FIUBSUMfiD. 



FEtETBNBE. 



— Continued. 

proprietor. In statute. Walker 7/. Smith, 21 How. 579 ; Central 

Bridge Corp. v, Abbott, 4 Cush. 473. 

on the of the doouxnent. In contmct. Bartlett v. Holmes, 

20 Eng. & Eq. 277. 

State V. Williams, 2 Hill (S. C), 382. 

to the governor. In constitution. Harpending v. Haight, 59 

Cal. 199. 

Collins V. State, 13 Fla. 651 ; Com. v, Keefe, 9 Gray, 291 ; Carmi- 
chael V, Bank, 4 How. (Miss.) 567 (35 Am. Dec. 408). 

Piper V. Moon, 10 Blatchf. 266. 

Tripp t/. Bristol Commrs., 2 Allen, 558. 

In constitution. Smith v. People, 47 N. Y. 33. 

officer. In statute, Stfoud v. Watts, 2 C. B. 930. 

Morford v. Peck, 46 Conn. 384. 

^"to be a retailer or seller. Com. v. Dean, 21 Pick. 334 ; Browne 

V, Hilton, 23 Pick. 319. 

In instruction to jury. State v, Estel, 6 Mo. (App.) 6. 

Hilton V, Bender, 69 N. Y. 75 ; Cronan v. New Orleans, 16 La. 
Ann. 374; Jackson v, Warford, 7 Wend. 62. 

great. In bill of rights. Re Alexander, 59 Mo. 598. 

flEJse . In statute. Com. v. Whitcomb, 107 Mass. 486; Ranncyv. 

People, 22 N. Y. 41 3; State V. Phifer. 65 N. C. 32 1 ; Reg. v, Henderson, 
C. & M. 328 ; People v. Conger, i Wheel. Crim. Cas. 449 ; People v, 
Haynes, 1 1 Wend. 565 ; People v, Kendall, 25 Wend. 399 ; Cliflford 
V, State, 56 Ind. 245; State v, Simmons, 58 Ind. 98; State t/. Newell, 
I Mo. 177; People v, Herrick, 13 Wend. 87; Reg. v. Bull, 13 Cox 
C. C. 608; Reg. V, Bumsides, Bell C. C. 282; Com. v. Drew, 19 
Pick. 179; State v, Tomlin, 5 Dutch. 13; State v, Kube, 20 Wis. 
217; Tyler v. State, 2 Humph. 37; Reg. v, Giles, L. & C. 508; 10 
Cox C. C. 44; Reg. V, Bunce, i F. & F. 523 ; Reg. v. Coleman, 2 East 
P. C. 672; Reg. V. Airey, 2 East 30; Reg. v, Barnes, T. & M. 
387 ; 2 Den. C. C. S9 ; Reg. v, Thompson, L. & C. 233 ; 9 Cox C. C. 
222; Bonnell v. State, 64 Ind. 498; Reg. v. Bulmer, L. &C. 476; 9 
Cox C. C. 492; Reg. V, Davis, 11 Cox C. C. 181 ; Com. v. Hulbert, 
12 Mete. 446; People v. Johnson, 12 Johns. 292; People v. Miller, 14 
Jolyis. 371; McCorkle v. State, i Cold. (Tenn.) 333; Chapman f. 
State, 2 Head 36 ; Reg. v. Butcher, 8 Cox C. C. 77 ; Reg. v. Bloom- 
field, C. & M. 537; Reg. V, Archer, Dears. C. C. 449; 6 Cox C. C. 
515; 33 Eng. L. & Eq. 528; Jones v. State, 50 Ind. 473; Reg. ??. 
Crab, 1 1 Cox C. C. 85 ; C. C. R. ; Reg. v. Asterley, 7 C. & P. 191 : 
Reg. V, Story, R. & R. 81 ; Reg. v, Barnard, 7 C. & P. 7^; 
Reg. V, Hamilton, 9 Ad. & El. 276; Com. v. Drew, 19 Pick, 
179; Com. V, Daniels, 2 Parsons, 332; Reg. v. Copeland, 
C. & M. 517; Reg. z/. Jennison, 9 Cox C. C. 158; L. & C. 157; Reg. 
V, Johnston, 2 Mood. C. C. 254; Reg. v. Simmonds, 4 Cox C. C. 
277; Reg. V, Cook, L. R.. r C. C. 295; 12 Cox C. C. 11 ; Reg. v. 
Leonard, 3 Cox C. C. 284; Reg. v. Bull, 13 Cox C. C. 60S; Com. «^. 
Henry, 22 Penn. St. 253; Thomas v. People, 34 N. Y. 351; 
Bowler v. State, 41 Miss. 570; Reg. v. Hamilton, 9 Ad. & El. 
(N. S.) 271; Reg. V. Jennison, 9 Cox C. C. 158; L. & C. C. C. iS7t 
Beattie v. Lord Ebury, L. R., 7 Ch. App. 777 ; State v, Estes, 46 Me. 
150; State V, Webb, 26 Iowa, 262; People v, Crissie, 4 Denio, 525: 



PRETENCE. 2n PRINCIPAL. 

FBSTENSE— Continued. 

Reg. V, Ridgway, 3 F. & F. 838; People v, Jacobs, 35 Mich. 36; Reg. 
V. Keighley, Dears. & B. 145; State «/. Mills, 17 Me. 211; Greenough, 
in re, 31 Vt. 279; Cowles v. State, 50 Ala. 454; Reg. v. Abbott, 2 C. 
& K. 630; I Den. C. C. 273; Reg. v. Keighley, D. & B. 145; State z/. 
Stanley, 64 Me. 157J People v. Crissie, 4 Denio, 525; Reg. v. Cod- 
rington, i C. & P. 661; State v, Chunn, 19 Mo. 233; Reg. v. Ken- 
rick, 5 Q. R 49; State v. Dorr, 33 Me. 498; State v, Stanley, 64 Me. 
157; State V. Jones, 70 N. C. 75; State v. Munday, 78 N. C. 460; 
State V, Newell, i Mo. 248; Reg. v, Freeth, R. & R. 127; Reg. v. 
Jackson, 3 Camp. 370; 2 East P. C. 940; Reg. v, Parker, 2 Mood. 
C. C. I ; 8 C. & P. 825 ; Smith v. People, 47 N. Y. 303; Com. v, Col- 
lins, 8 Phila. 609; Maley v. State, 31 Ind. 192; Reg. v, Hazelton, L. 
R., 2 C.C. 134; 13 CoxC. C. i; State v, Vandermark, 35 Ark. 396; 
State V. Pauley, 26 Conn. 587; Colley v. State, 55 Ala. 85 ; Watson 
V, People, 87 N. Y. 562. 

PBBVAHJWG. party. In statute. New Haven, etc., R. Co. v, Northampton, 

102 Mass. 120; Weston 7/. Cushing, 4$ Vt 531 ; Henry v. Miller, 61 
Me. 105; Bangor, etc., R. Co. v. Chamberlain, 60 Me. 285; Hawkins 
V, Nowland, 53 Mo. 328; Rogers t/. City of St. Charles, 54 Mo. 229. 

PBBVBNT. In plea. Cort v, R. Co., 17 Q. B. 142. 

PREVENTED. In statute. Huidekoper v. Douglas, i Wash. 259. 

FRBVIOUS. inBuranoe. In insurance policy. iEtna Ins. Co. v. Tyler, 16 

Wend. 385 (30 Am. Dec. 90). 

intention. Com. v. Ober, 12 Cush.496. 

PBBVIOUSLY. sum offered. In statute. Metropolitan R. Co. v. Turnham, 14 

C. B. (N. S.) 223. 

PBIGE. In statute. Hudson Iron Co. v. Alger, 54 N. Y. 173 ; Hoadtey v. Mc- 

Laine, 10 Bing. 482. 

dear of all expenses. In contract. Stratford v. Bosworth, 2 

Ves. & B. 341. 

PBICB-CUBRBNT. Cases of Champagne, i Ben. 249. 

PBUCA FACTEE. state Bk. v. Hastings, 15 Wis. 85. 

evidenoe. Emmons v. Westfield Bk., 97 Mass. 230 ; Lilienthal's 

Tobacco V. U. S., 7 Otto, 268; Kelly v, Jackson, 6 Pet. 622 ; U. S. v, 
Wiggins, 14 Pet. 334. 

PRTTJfTR. barley. In contract. Whetmore v. Coates, 14 Mo. 10. 

cost. In statute. U. S. v. Sixteen Packages, 2 Mason, 53 ; Tap- 
pan V. U. S., 2 Mason, 399. 

logs. In contract. Spring v. Cockburn, 19 U. C. C. P. 63. 

quality winter oil. In warranty. Hastings v. Lovering, 2 



Pick. 214 (13 Am. Dec. 420). 
singed bacon. In contract. Yates v. Pym, 6 Taunt. 445. 

Walsh V. State, 3 Tex. (App.) 420. 

In statute. Williams v. Fitzhugh, 37 N. Y. 444. 

debtor. In statute. Re Duff, 4 Fed. Rep. 519 ; re Loder, 4 Ben. 

328. 

money. In will. Prichard v. Prichard, L. R.. 1 1 Eq. Cas. 232. 

officer of suoh corporation. In statute. Farmers' Loan, etc., 



Co. V. Warring, 20 Wis. 290. 



PRINCIPAL, 



278 



PRIVATE. 



FBnrCIFI.E. 



PBnrr. 



FEINTED. 

PBHiTEB. 
PBINTDVG. 



PBIOB. 



PBISOir. 



FBIVATE. 



Continued. 

plaoe of busineas. In statute. Middletown Ferry Co. r. Town 

of Middletown, 40 Conn. 65. 

all his creditors. In contract. Re Decker, 8 Ben. 83. 

Le Roy V. Tatham, 22 How. 132; Tatham v. Le Roy, 2 Blatchf. 474; 
Smith z/. Pearce, 2 McLean, 176; Roberts v. Ward, 4 McLean, 565; 
Parker 1/. Stiles, 5 McLean, 44; Lattaz/. Shawk, i Bond, 265. 

In statute. Wood v, Abbott, 5 Blatchf. 325; tJ. S. v, Williams, 3 Fed. 
Rep. 484; Yuengling V. Schiele, 12 Fed. Rep. 103. 

or engraving. In statute. Wood v, Abbott, 5 Blatchf. 325. 

work. In statute, Hardcastle v, Jones, 3 B. & S. 160. 

matter. In statute, Arthur v, Moller, 7 Otto, 365. 

sheets. In indictment. Com. v, Merrifield, 4 Mete. 368. 

In statute, Pennoyerv. Neff, 5 Otto, 714; 3 Sawyer, 282; Quinceyz'. 
Porter, 37 Cal. 448 ; Reynolds v, Schmidt, 20 Wis. 380. 

In statute, Rossiter v. Hall, 5 Blatchf. 363. 

establishment where the chief process of is carried on. In 

statute, Hoylez/. Oram, 12 C. B. (N. S.) 135. 

incidental process. In statute, Hardcastle v, Jones, 3 B. & S. 

160 ; Hoyle v, Oram, 12 C. B. (N. S) 135. 

in date. In insurance policy. Brown v, Hartford Ins. Co^ 3 



Day, 66. 

In statute, Sheppard v. Bradford, 16 C. B. (N. S.) 378. 

breach. State z/. Beebe, 13 Kans. 589; Reg. v, Haswell, Russ. 

& Ry. 458; Reg. v. Waters, 12 Cox C. C. 390; Reg. v. Bootie, 2 
Burr. 864; Reg. v, Stokes, 5 C. & P. 148; Com. v. Filbum, 119 
Mass. 297 ; State v, Beebe, 13 Kans. 339 ; Reg. v, Kelly, i Cr. &Dix. 
202 ; Shattuck v. State, 51 Miss. 525. 

charges. In statute. How v* Codman, 4 Me. 82. 

in for debt. In statute. Ex parte Stoffel, L. R., 3 Ch. App. 240. 

lain in . In statute, Sumpton v, Monzani, 4 Ad. & Ell. loio. 

Coman v. Storm, i Robt. 75. 

In plat. Smith v. Heath, 102 111. 130. 

charity. In will, Ommaney v. Butcher, Turn. & R. 272. 

conversations. In statute, Jacobs v, Hessler, 113 Mass. 157. 

corporation. Dartmouth College v. Woodward, 4 Wheat 518; 

Edwards v, Jagers, 19 Ind. 407. 

dwelling. In deed, Garnett v, Albree, 103 Mass. 374. 

dwelling-house only. In deed, Wickenden v. Webster, 6 El. 

& Bl. 387. 

expenses. In deed. Stoughton v. Lynch, i Johns. Ch. 467. 

friends. In statute, Corbet v, Haigh, 5 C. P. Div. 52. 

house. In statute. Com. v, Cuncannon, 3 Brewst 344. 

person. In statute. Coats v. People, 22 N. Y. 245 ; King v. In- 
habitants, 3 B. & Ad. 1 50. 

property. In constitution, Alabama R. Co. z/. Kenney, 39 Ala. 

307 ; Enfield Toll Bridge Co. v, Hartfield, etc., R. Co., 17 Conn. 42; 
Comm'rs v. Withers, 29 Miss. 21. 

rights. In constitution, Ruth v, Ottenheimer, 6 Oregon, 231. 



PRIVATE. 279 PRIVILEGES 

Continued. 

seoorities. In statute, Buchanan v. Talbot Co., 47 Md. 286. 

use. Edwards t/. Stonington Cemetery Association, 20 Conn. 

468. 

way. Presby v. Old Colony, etc., R. Co., 103 Mass. i ; Denham 



V, Bristol Comm'rs, 108 Mass. 202. 

FBTVATELY. steal.' In statute. Rex v, Cartwright, 2 East P. C. 641 ; Rex v. 

Jones, 2 East P. C. 641 ; Rex v, Matthews, 2 East P. C. 642. 

PBIVATE8. In indictment. Ardery v. State, 56 Ind. 328. 

Satterlee t/. Bliss, 36 Cal. 489. 

Basserman v. Society of Trinity Church, 39 Conn. 137 -, French v. 
Baker, 4 Sneed, 193; Campbell v, Spottswood, 3 B. & S. 780: 
Columbia v. Guest, 3 Head, 413; Jamaica Pond Aqueduct Co. v. 
Chandler, 9 Allen, 159; Anderson t^ And^rpon, i Pinn. (Wis.) 119. 

In contract. Birch v, De Peyster, i Stark. N. P. 210. 

of additional insuranoe. In insurance policy, Benedict v. 

Ocean Ins. Co., 31 N. Y. 389. 

of breeding back. In contract. Price v. Pepper, 13 Bush, 43. 

of deepening the ditoh. In deed, Collins v. Driscoll, 34 Conn. 



43. 

— of one-half of a saw-mill. In deed, Moore v, Fletcher, 16 Me. 



63 (33 Am. Dec. 633). 

of the shores. In grant, Ripley v. Knight, 123 Mass. 515. 

FBIVHiEaED. oommunioation. Somerville v. Hawkins, 10 C. B. 383 ; White v. 

Nicholls, 3 How. 266 ; Cooke v, Wildes, 5 El. & Bl. 329; Andrews v. 
Simms, 33 Ark. 771 ; White v, Nichols, 3 How. 266; Thorn v. 
Clanchard, $ Johns. 508. 

In constitution, Wiltse v. State, 8 Heisk. 544 ; Cate v. State, 3 Sneed, 
120. 

In deed. New Ipswich Factory v, Batchelder, 3 N. H. 190 (14 Am. 
Dec. 346). 

In statute, Humphreys v, Pegues, 16 Wall. 245. 

and appurtenances. In deed, Blakeman v, Blakeman, 39 Conn. 

320 ; Smith v, Moodus Water Power Co., 35 Conn. 392 ; Grant v. 
Chase, 17 Mass. 443 (9 Am. Dec. 161); Grayetty v, Bethune, 14 Mass. 
49 (7 Am. Dec. 188). 

and benefits. In statute, Humphries v, Harrison, 30 Ark. 85. 

and immunities. In constitution. Walker v, Sauvinet, 2 Otto, 

91 ; Bartmeyer v, Iowa, 18 Wall, 129 ; Coger v. North-western Packet 
Co., 37 Iowa, 145 ; re Taylor, 48 Md. 30; Vanbalkenberg v. Brown, 
43 Cal. 45 ; Ward v. Flood, 48 Cal. 36 ; Paul v. Virginia. 8 Wall. 
168; Connor z/. Elliott, 18 How. 591; Donnbam v, Alexandria 
Council, 10 Wall. 173; Keyser v. Rice, 47 Md.203 ; Live Stock Asso. 
V, Crescent City Co., i Abb. U. S. 388 ; Frasher v. State, 3 Tex. 
(App.) 263. 

belonging thereto. In lease, Ombony v, Jones, 19 N. Y. 234. 

of the shores. Instatute, Ripley z/. Knight, 123 Mass. 515. 



publio emoluments or . In constitution, Williams v, Cammack, 

27 Miss. 209. 
rights, powers and . In statute, Louisville, etc., R. Co. v. 

Gaines, 3 Fed. Rep. 267. 



PRIVITY. 



280 



PROCEEDS, 



PBTVlTr. 



FBOBABUB. 



FBOBATE. 



or knowledge. In statute, Knowlton v. Prov. S. S.Co., 53 N. 

Y. 79 ; Lord v. Goodall, 4 Sawyer, 294.. 

In deed, Clififord v, Hoare, L. R., 9 C. P. 363. 

verdiot. Barrett v. State, i Wis. 180. 

goods. The Adeline, 9 Cranch, 244. 

lawAil sulgeot of and capture. In statute, U. S. v. Athens 

Armory, i Abb. (U. S.) 129. 

In note. Long v, Colbom, 1 1 Mass. 97. 

oaiue. Munn v. Dupont, 3 Wash.C. C. 31 ; Wasner v. Wyckoff, 

16 N. Y. (S. C.) 178 ; Cooper V. Utterback, 37 Md.282 ; Harphamv. 

Whitney, 77 III. 32 ; Lacy v. Mitchell, 23 Ind. 67 ; Driggs v. Burton. 

44 Vt. 124; Wheelet v, Nesbitt, 24 How. 544; The Thompson, 3 

Wall. 155 ; Mitchell v. Wall, in Mass. 492 ; Broad v. Ham, $ Bing. 

(N. C.) 722; Bacon v. Towne, 4 Cush. 217; Boyd v. Cross, 35 Md. 

197 ; Stansberry v. Fogle, 37 Mo. 469 ; Foshay v, Ferguson, 2 Denio, 

617 ; McGurn v, Brackett, 33 Me. 331 ; Ames v. Snider, 69 111. 376*' 

Lauda v. Obert, 45 Tex. 539 ; Hall v. Suydam, 6 Barb. 83 ; Ulmer v. 

Leland, i Me. 135; Braveboy v. Cockfield, i McM. 270; Carl v. 

Ayres, 53 N. Y. 14 ; Burlingame v, Burlingame, 8 Cow. 141. 

In constitution. Re Coleman, 15 Blatchf. 417. 

In statute, Locke v, U. S.. 7 Cranch, 339 ; Wood v, U. S.. 16 Peters, 
342 ; Clifton v, U. S., 4 How. 242 ; Buckley v, U. S.. 4 How 251 ; U. 
S. V, Bollman, i Cranch C. C. 373. 

and testamentary matters. Bank of Hamilton v, Dudley's 

Lessee, 2 Peters, 492. 

PBOBATIONABY. drawings. In contract, Moffatt v, Dickson, 13 C. B. 543* 

PROCEED. In agreement. Planters' Bk. v, Houser. 57 Ga. 140. 

to sea. In statute, Behucke v. King, 9 S. & R. 154. 

— without delay. In charter-party. Antole v. Gill, 5 Fed. Rep* 
128. 

PBOCEEDING. People v. Clark, 9 N. Y. 349. 

In statute, Wilson v, Macklin, 7 Neb. 50 ; Dailey v. Burke, 28 Ala. 
328 ; re Lead Mine Co., 7 Ch: Div. 371 ; Flather v. Stubbs, 2 Q. B 
614. 

PBOCEEDINGH3. In statute, Morewood v. Hollister, 6 N. Y. 309 ; Wilson v, Allen. 

3 How. Pr. 369; Hine v, Belden, 27 Conn. 384; Williamson v, 
Champlin, Clarke, 9 ; Rich v, Husson, i Duer, 617; Bonestecl ?. 
Orvis, 31 Wis. 117 ; Cooper v, Garesche, 21 Mo. 151 ; Hoganv. Hoyt 
37 N. Y. 300; Queen v, R. Co., L. R., 3 Q. B. 170; re O'Farrell 3 
Ben. 192. 

in court. Dwight v, Phillips, 48 Barb. 1 16. 

in the oause. Ward v, Cohen, 3 S. C. 338. 

thereupon. In statute. U. S. v. Knight, 3 Sumner, 371. 

judicial, legislatiye or other public official . In statute. San- 
ford V, Bennett, 24 N. Y. 20. 

Belmont V. Pouvert, 35 N. Y. (S. C.) 208; Mitchell v, Danforth. 12 
Bush. 331. 

In insurance policy. Haven v. Gray, 12 Mass. 71 ; Dow v, Hope Ins. 
Co.. I Hall, 166 ; Dow v, Whetton, 8 Wend. 160 ; Hancox v. Fishing 
Ins. Co., 3 Sumner, 134 ; Whitney 7/. American Ins. Co., 3 Oxv- 21a 

In will, Thomson's Appeal, 89 Pa. St, 36. 



PROCEEDS. 28l PROFESSION. 



•:w:^:^• ; 



- Continaed. 

of a mortgage. In will. American Bible Soc. z/. Van Norman^ 

2 N. W. Rep. 244. 

or avails. Cushman v, Richards, 100 Mass. 233. 

of such sale. In statute. Stock v, Holland, L. R., 9 Ex. 147. 

surplus . In statute, Hannibal, etc., R. Co. v. Bartlett, 123 Mass. 

15. 
Webster v. Com., 5 Cush. 403 ; Piper v. Brown, 4 Fish. Pat. Cas. 175 ; 
Bailey v, Williams, 6 Oregon, 71. 

In constitution. Sprague v. Birchard, i Wis. 469 ; Porter v. Vander- 
cook, II Wis. 70; Gilmer?/. Bird, 15 Fla. 410; Hanna v, Russell, 12 
Minn. 80, Lowry v. Harris, 12 Minn. 225 ; Blair v. Reading, 99 IIU 
600. 

In statute. McBratney v. Usher, i Dill. 367 ; Hyatt v. Allen, 56 N. Y. 
553 ; Bailey v. Williams, 6 Oregon, 71 ; Forsyth v. Pierson, 9 Fed. 
Rep. 801 ; Coming v. Burden, 15 How. 267; U. S. v. Noah, i Payne, 
375 ; People v. Nevens, i Hill, 154 ; Utica City Bk. v. Buel, 9 Abb. 
Pr. 385; Fitzpatrick V. New Orleans, 27 La Ann. 457; Reddick v. 
Cloud, 7 111. 670 ; Curry v. Hinman, 11 111. 420; Scarritt v. Chapman, 
II 111. 443; Taylor v. Henry, 2 Pick. 397 ; Nichols v. Mitchell, 70 
111. 258 ; Guerinx/. Rose, 33 Cal. 292 ; Tully v, Baubien, 10 Iowa, 187 ; 
Coze V. Martin, 44 Pa. St. 322 ; Drexel v. Miller, 49 Pa. St. 246; 
Solomon v. Graham, 5 £1. & Bl. 324 ; Long v. Wordsworth, 4 B. & 
Adol. 367; Attorney-General v. Sillem, 2 H. & C. 623; 10 H. L. Cas. 
704; Hannibal, etc., R. Co. v. Crane, 102 111. 249, 

all . In statute. Fluester v. McClelland, 8 C. B. (N. S.) 360. 

legal . In statute, Sauer v, Steinhaur, 14 Wis. 77. 

TION. Lapeyre V. U. S., 17 Wall. 191. 

Re Smith, 3 Hurl, k N. 234 ; re Black, 2 Ben. 196 ; Henslow v. Fawcett* 

3 Ad. & Ell. 55 ; Gibson v. Birch, Carr. & M. 458. 

adyise and assist. In indictment. U. S. v. Wills, 7 Peters, 138. 

or Buffor. In statute. Wilson v. City Bk., 17 Wall. 473; Bu- 
chanan V, Smith, 16 Wall. 277. 
any female to have illicit oamal connection with any man* 



In statute. People v, Roderigas, 49 Cal. 11. 

PBOBUCE. In will. Newland v. Shepherd, 2 P. Wms. 194; Craft v. Snook, 13 N. 

J. (Eq.) 121. 

-: — an income. In statute, Johnson v. Perley, 2 N. H. 56 (9 Am. 
Dec. 35). 

broker. In statute. U. S. v, Simons, i Abb. U. S. 470. 

of a fbrm. In statute. Mayor v, Davis, 6 W. & S. 269. 

or commodity. State v. Borroum, 23 Miss. 478. 

yearly . In deed. Ladd v, Abel, 18 Conn. 515. 

PBODUCfP. In contract. Stewart v. Smith, 29 111. 397. 

of distillation. In statute. One Vaporizer, 2 Ben. 439. 

PBODUCnOM". In statute. Taylor v. Hathaway, 29 Ark. 600 ; Dano v. R. Co., 27 Ark. 

567. 

FBOBlTCfFIVE. real estate. In will. Holcomb v. Holcomb, 11 N. J. (Eq.) 476. 

Thompson v, Bertrandi 23 Ark. 733. 

trade and occupation. In statute. Comm'rs v. Reynolds, 7 W. 



36 



& S. 330. 



PROFESSION. 282 PROMISSOR K 

PBOFB88ION — Continued. 

^ trade or employment. Wilcox v. Middlesex Comm'rs. 103 

Mass. 545. 

oooupation or employment. In statute, Schuchardt v. People. 

99 111. 504. 

FBOFESSIONAL. employment. In statute, Pennock v. Fuller, 41 Mich« 153. 

gambler. In statute. State v, Newton, 59 Ind. 173. 

PBOnr. Queen v, Capel, 12 Ad. & Ell. 414. 

a prendre. Pierce v. Keator, 70 N. Y. 419. 

on cargo. In insurance policy. Halhead v. Young, 6 El. & BL 324. 

on on palm oil. In insurance policy, Chope v, Reynolds, 5 C. R 

(N.S.)64i. 

purpose of . In statute, Morris v. Walker, 15 Q. B. 598 ; Bear v. 

Bromley, 16 Jur. 45 ; 1 1 Eng. L. & £q. 414. 

FBOFITABLE. In statute, Reg. v. Inhabitants, 3 Q. B. 250. 

PBOFITH. Matthews v, Crosby, 56 N.H. 21; Connely v, Davidson, 1$ Minn. 519; 

Wallace v, Beebe, 12 Allen, 354; Fuller v. Miller, 105 Mass. 103; 
Mera V. Conover, 11 Off. Pat. Gaz. iiii. 

In deed. Lord Rokeby v, Elliot, 27 W. R. 58 ; L. R., 5 Ch. 103. 

In promissory note, Matthews v, Crosby, 56 N. H. 21. 

/■; statute. Queen v. Mayor, 9 Ad. & Ell. 435 ; Eyster v. Centennial 
B )ard of Finance, 4 Otto, 500. 

aii benefits. In will. Collier v, Grimsey, 36 Ohio St. 17. 

and oommoditieB. In lease. Queen v, R Co., 14 Q. B. 25. 

in hand. In agreement. Re Trading Co., L. R., 4 Ch. App. 47$. 

used in oonatmction. In statute. Grant v, Hartford, etc., R. Co.. 

3 Otto, 225 ; Hartford, etc., R. Co. v. Grant, 9 Blatchf. 542. 

rents and . Mansfield v, Atwood, 84 III. 497. 

firom. In insurance policy, Odiorne v, Ins. Co., loi Mass. 551. 

Washburn v, Phillips, 2 Mete. 296; Mayo v, Jsunes, 12 Gratt. 17; 
Quimbo Appo v. People, 20 N. Y. 531; U. S. v, Hoffman. 4 Wall. 158. 

In statute, Casby v, Thompson, 42 Mo. 133. 

writ of . In constitution. Cannon v, Kenfield, 57 Cal. 550. 

PBOJECnONS. In statute. Gushing v, Boston, 128 Mass. 330. 

PBOUXITY. without unneoeasary . In statute, Merrill z^. Everett, 38 Conn. 4S. 

Avery v. Inhabitants of Tyringham, 3 Mass. 160 (3 Am. Dec. 105). 

In statute, Saunders v. Wakefield, 4 B. & Aid. 604; Simpson v. Yead> 
L. R., 4 Q. B. 626; State v, Harker, 4 Harr. (Del.) 559. 

of marriage. In statute. People v, Alger, i Park. C. C. 333 ; 

Kenyon v. People, 26 N. Y. 203. 

acknowledgment or . In statute. Palmer v, Andrews, i McAli. 

495. 

oollateral • Nelson v. Boynton, 3 Mete. 396 (37 Am. Dec. 148) ; 

Stone V. Walker, 13 Gray, 615 ; Clay v. Walton, 9 Cal. 334. 

original . Nelson v, Boynton, 3 Mete. 396 (37 Am. Dec. 148); 

Stone V, Walker, 13 Gray, 615 ; Clay v, Walton, 9 Cal 334. 

to pay. In plea, Metcalf^^. Robinson, 2 McLean, 363. 

FBOMI8SOBY. note. Bolton v. Dugdale, 4 B. & Adol. 620 ; Hall v. Farmer, 5 

Dcnio, 484; Corbitt v. Stonemetz, 15 Wis. 170; Harding ik State* 54 



•):■■:« 



•):■■:. 



PROMISSORY. 283 PROPERTY. 

— Continued. 

Ind. 359; Poorman z/. Mills, 35 Cal. 118; Conn v. Thornton, 46 Ala. 
587 ; Corbett v. State, 24 Ga. 287. 

In statute, Harding v. State, 54 Ind. 359; U. S. v. Hardyman, 13 Pet. 
176 ; People v, Bradley, 4 Park., C. C. 245 ; Com. Ins. Co. v. Whit- 
ney, I Mete. 22 ; Blanchenhagen v, Blundell, 2 B. & Aid. 420 ; Dame- 
wood V. State, I How. (Miss.) 264; Spangler v. Com.. 3 Binney, 353; 
Com. V, McLaughlin, 4 Rawle, 464; Stewart v. Com. 4 S. & R. 194; 
Com. V. Richards, i Mass. 337; Com. 7/. Brettand, 100 Mass. 206; 
Phelps V, People, 72 N. Y. 334 ; Rex v. Ranson, i Russ. & Ry. 235; 
Rex V, Box, I Russ. & Ry. 301; Sibley v, Phelps, 6 Cush. 172. 

In plea, Webster v, Bainbridge, 20 N. Y. (S. C.) 180. 

notd not negotiable. In statute. Currier v, Lockwood, 40 Conn. 

350. 
note signed in the preaenoe of an attesting witness. In 



statute. Daggett v. Daggett, 124 Mass. 149. 

— notes. In indictment. Com. v, Gallagher, 126 Mass. 54 ; Com. v. 
Griffiths, 126 Mass. 252; Com. v Ashton, 125 Mass. 384; Com. v. 
Butts, 124 Mass. 449. 

— notes for the payment of money. In statute, Culp v. State, i 



Port. 33 (26 Am. Dec. 357). 

a lottery. In statute. Miller v. Com., 13 Bush, 731. 

the progress of soienoe and the useAil arts. In constitution. 

Martenetti v. Maguire, i Abb. (U. S.) 360. 

FBOMOTEB. Emma Silver Mining Co. v, Lewis, 4 C. P. Div. 396. 

In statute. Wheeler v. Board, L. R., 4 Ex. 303. 

Schloss V, Creditors, 31 Cal. 201. 

In statute. Hill v. Hunt, 20 N. J. (L.) 476 ; Stanley v. Homer, 24 N. 
J. (L.) 511; Brown v, Hinchman, 9 Johns. 75. 

is evident. In constitution, Webb v. State, 4 Tex. (App.) 167 ; 

ex parte Cook, 2 Tex. (App.) 388 ; ex parte l^oore, 5 Tex. (App.) 
109; McCoy z/. State, 25 Tex. 38; ex parte Foster, 5 Tex. (App.) 
626. 

of service. In statute, Neff v, Pennoyer, 3 Sawy. 283. 



satislhotory . In statute. Van Steenbergh v, Kortz, 10 Johns. 

167 ; Hill V, Watson, 10 S. C. 268. 

In deed, Morris v, Rhydydefed Colliery Co.. 3 Hurl. & N. 888. 

and needAil struotures. In decree, Lonsdale Co. v. Mores, 2 

Cliff. 547. 

books of aoooimt. In statute. Re Bellis, 3 Ben. 54. 

executive authority. In treaty. The British Prisoners, i 



Woodb. & M. 75. 

Rogers v, Kenney, 9 Q. B. 593 ; re Parrot, i Fed. Rep. 481 ; Stahl v, 
Webster, 11 111. 511; U. S. v. Rogers, 9 How. 127; DIassus v, U. S., 
9 Pet. 117; Smith v, U. S., 10 Pet. 329; Soulard v, U. S., 4 Pet. 511. 

In constitution. People v, Eddy, 43 Cal. 331; Savings Soc. v, Austin, 
46 Cal. 415 ; O'Hara v. Stock, 90 Pa. St. 477 ; Munn v. People, 69 
111.80; City of New Orleans v. Mechanics*, etc., Ins. Co., 30 La. 
Ann. 876 (31 Am. Rep. 232); People v, Hibernia Sav. So., 51 Cal. 
243 (21 Am. Rep. 704); re Wong Yung Quy, 2 Fed. Rep. 624; Old 
Colony, etc., R. Co., v, Plymouth, 14 Gray, 1 55 ; Sherman v. Elder, 



PROPERTY. 284 PROPERTY. 

"PBOPISRTY — Continued. 

24 N. Y. 381 ; Primm v. City of Belleville, 59 111. 142 ; People v. 
Worthington, 21 111. 171 ; State v, Philadelphia, etc., R. Co., 45 Md. 
361; Smith V. Metropolitan Gas Co., 12 How. Pr. 187; Straub i'. 
Gordon, 27 Ark. 62$; Home Ins. Co. v. City Council, 50 Ga. 530; 
ex parte Cooper, 3 Tex. (App.) 489; Rigney v. City of Chicago, 102 
III. 65 ; People v. Badlam, 57 Cal. $94 1 ex parte Cooper. 3 Tex. 
(App.) 489 ; Stevens v. State, 2 Ark. 291 (35 Am. Dec. 72). 

/n contract. Re Hutchins, 4 Q. B. Div. 483 ; Chamberlain v. Western 
Trans. Co., 45 Barb. 218. 

In insurance policy, Wheton v. Old Colony Ins. Co., 2 Mete, i; Hoi- 
brook V, Brown, 2 Mass. 280 ; Wiggin v. Mercantile Ins. Co., 7 Pick. 
271; Locke V, North American Ins. Co., 13 Mass. 61; Tyler «^. iEtiia 
Ins. Co., 12 Wend. 507; 16 Wend. 385; Springfield Ins. Co. z^. Allen, 
43 N. Y. 398. 

In statute. Belcher v, Sikes, 6 B. & C. 236 ; Doe v, R. Co., 2 Q. B. 
363; Warren v. Howe, 2 B. & C. 282 ; Queensbury Soc. v. Pickles, 
L. R., I Ex. i; re Cigala, 7Cb. Div. 351; Queensbury Soc. v. Pickles. 
3 H. & C. 860; Queen v. Overseers, L. R., 6 Q. B. 717; Webb v, 
Whiffin, L. R., 5 H. L. 711; Helbert v. Banner, 5 H. L 28; 
Keys V, Milwaukee, etc., R. Co., 25 Wis. 693 ; Wilson v. 
Boyce, 2 Otto, 320; Barclay v. Plant, 50 Ala. 509; Mitchell v, 
Mitchell, 35 Miss. 108; Peoples. Williams, 24 Mich. 156; Cross v, 
Haldeman, 15 Ark. 200; Adams v, Hackett, 7 Cal. 203; Tracy v. 
. Leland, 2 Sandf. 729; Owen v. Smith, 31 Barb. 646; De Witt v. San 
Francisco, 2 Cal. 289; People v. Mayor, 9 Barb. 533; Bancroft v, 
Curtiss, 108 Mass. 47; Fling v, Goodall, 40 N. H. 208; Crone v. 
Braun, 23 Minn. 239; Hopkins 7/. Folger, 60 Me. 266 ; Miffingtown 
V. Jacobs, 69 Pa. St. 151 ; Coe v, Columbus, etc., R. Co.. 10 Ohio 
St. 372; White River Tp. Co. v, Vermont Cent. R. Co., 21 Vt. 590; 
Wilmington R. Co. v. Reid, 13 Wall. 264; Stanley v, Stanley, 26 Me. 
191; Union Ins. Co. v, U. S. 6 Wall. 759; Wilson v, Boyce, 2 Otto, 
3«o ; West Side Bk. v. Pugsley, 47 N. Y. 368 ; Children v. Cutler. 
16 Mo. 24; Eypert v, Bolemus, 2 Abb. N. C. 193 ; Sansburyi^. State, 
3 Tex. (App.) loi. 

In will. Spencer v, Higgins, 22 Conn. 529; Wheeler v. Dunlop, 12 B- 
Monr. 293 ; Monroe v, Jones, 8 R. I. 526 ; Foxall v, McKenney, 3 
Cranch C. C. 206; Funchess v. Seibe, 27 Miss. 27; Den v. Payner 

5 Hayw. 104 ; Morris v, Henderson, 37 Miss. 492 ; Rosetter v, Sim- 
mons, 6 S. & R. 452 ; Pell v. Ball, Spears Ch. 48; Adams v. Jones. 

6 Jones (Eq.), 221; Phippin v, Ellison, 12 I red. (L.) 61 ; McLenmore 
7/. Goode, I Harp. (Eq.) 272 ; Foxall v, McKenney, 3 Cranch C. C. 
206 ; Brown v. Brown, 41 N. Y. 507 ; Laing v, Barbour, 1 19 Mass. 535. 

and efEbots. In deed, Reynolds z/. Bullock, 26 W. R. 678. 

In statute. Cross v. Haldeman, 15 Ark. 200; Crane v. Braun, 33 
Minn. 239; Fling v. Goodall, 40 N. H. 208. 

In will, Morgan v, Morgan, 6 B. & C. 518. 

and estate. In deed. Railroad Co. v, Trimble, 10 Wall. 367 ; 

Allen V, White, 97 Mass. 507. 

deemed desirable in the transaction of its business. In 

statute, Iowa Lumber Co. v, Foster, 49 Iowa, 25 (31 Am. Rep. 
140). 

of another. In statute. Com. v, Stearn.*, 2 Mete. 343. 



PROPERTY. 285 PROSECUTE. 

PROPERTY — Continued. 

of whatBoever ktad, tenure or nature. In statute. Wilson v. 

Hood, 3 H. & C. 148. 
on board. In insurance policy. Whiton v. Old Colony Ins. Qp., 

2 Mete. I. 

other than land. In statute. Regina v. Water Co., 6 El. & Bl. 

lOIO. 

personal and real. In will. Pell v. Bell, i Speer (Eq.) 56. 

reoovered or preserved. In statute. Pinkerton v, Eastin, L. 

R., 16 Eq. Cas. 490. 

rights or interest of another. In statute* James v. Christy, 

18 Mo. 162. 

shall be restored. In statute. Scattergood v. Sylvester, 1 5 Q. 

R 507. 

Buljeot to taasation. Wilcox v. Middlesex Comm'rs, 103 Mass. 



545. 

all merchandise and . In statute. Keeler v. Mich. South. R. R. 

I Biss. 35. 

American . In statute. Bayard v. Ins. Co., 4 Mason, 265. 

original and ultimate . In constitution. People v. Rector, etc.» 

of Trinity Church, 22 N. Y. 44. 

life, liberty or . In constitution. Donahoe v. County of Will, 

100 111. 106. 

other . In statute. Earle v. Sawyer, 6 Cush. 142. 

personal . In statute, Stief v. Hart, i N. Y. 23. 

the said . In will. Peppercorn v. Peacock, 3 Man. & G. 195. 

PBOFOBTION. In statute. State v. Comm'fs, 34 Wis. 162 ; Tyler v. City of St. Louis, 

56 Mo. 60. 

PBOFOBTIONAIi. share. Bancroft v. Boston, 115 Mass. 379. 

PBOFOBTIONS. just and equal . Cheever v. Clark, 7 S. & R. 514. 

FBOPOSALS. to buy, sell or procure lottery tickets. In statute. State v. 

Sykes, 28 Conn. 226. 

M In statute. Heine z/. Appleton, 4 Blatchf. 125; Tibbits v. Yorke, 5 
B. & Ad. 605 ; Milligen v. Picken, i C. B. 800 ; Bronson v. Yancy, 

I Dev. (Eq.) 77 ; Quivey v. Porter, 37 Cal. 458. 

or proprietors. In statute. Boston v. Worcester, etc., R. Co., 

II Cush. 512. 

legal . In statute. Little v. Hall, 18 How. 165. 

. In contract. Rossiter v. Miller, 3 App. Cas. 11 24 ; Rossiter v. 
Miller, 5 Ch. Div. 648. 

In statute. Hall v. Brown. S4 N. H. 472. 

of every railroad. In statute. Pierce v. Concord R: R., 51 N. 

H. 591 . 

owners or * . In statute. Lister v. Lobley, 6 Nev. & M. 340. 

'. Com. V. Alger, 7 Cush. 70. 

FBO BATA. In contract. Penniman v. Stanley, 122 Mass. 310 ; Taylor v. Stevens. 

7 How. Pr. 415. 

PBOSBCUTE. with effect. In bond. Morris v. Matthews, 2 Q. B. 297. 

fiul to . In statute. Martin v. Fales. 18 Me. 23 (36 Am. Dec. 693). 



PRO SEC UTED. 286 PRO VISION. 



'PBOBBCUTED. within one yoftr. In insurance party. Merchants, etc, Ins. 

Co. V, Lacroix, 35 Tex. 249. 

FBOSEOUTION. In statute. Queen v. Inhabitants, 8 Ad. & Ell. 496 ; Com. v. Haas, 

57 Pa. St. 443 ; Dalloway v. Turrell, 26 Wend. 383; State v. Hardcn- 
burg, 2^N. J. (L.) 355. 

maintenance and pnnialunent of olltaders. In statute. Reg. 

V, Birmingham, 10 Q. B. 127. 

of the action. In statute, Hume t/. Dru3rff, L. R., 8 Ex. 214. 

FB08E0 U TIONS. criminal . In constitution. State v, Wolcott, 21 Conn. 279. 

PB08ECUT0B. In statute. Phillips v, Bevans, 23 N. J. (L.) 373. 

PBOSTITUTE. State v. Stoyell, 54 Me. 24. 

FBOSTIT U TiON. pnrpoee of . In [statute. State v, Stoyell. 54 Me. 24; Os- 

born V. State, 52 Ind. 526; State v. Ruhl, 8 Iowa, 447; Com.». 
Cook, 12 Mete. 93; Carpenter t/. People, 8 Barb. 603. 

FBOTECT. In constitution. Peters v. Grubbi 21 Pa. St. 455. 

FBOTBCnON. In statute. Re Glaser, 2 Ben. 180. 

purposes. In insurance policy. Arkansas Ins. Co. v. Bostick, 

27 Ark. 539. 

PBOTBST. Coddington v, Davis, i N. Y. 186; Breusler v, Arnold, i Wis. 264; 

Ayerault v. Pacific Bk., 47 N. Y. 570 ; Townsend v, Lorain Bk., 2 
Ohio St 345. 
in writing. In statute. Knowles v. City of Boston, 129 Mass. 

551. 

waive . In contract, Coddington t/. Davis, i N.Y. 186; 3Demo, 

16. 

PBOTE8TABLE. secnrity. In statute. Dunn v, Adams, i Ala. 527 (35 Am. 

Dec 42). 

PBOTESTAITF. dissenters. Dmmmond v. Atty.-General, 2 H. L. Cas. 387. 

L. In constitution. Hale v. Everett, 53 N. H. 9 (16 Am, 



Rep. 82). 

PBOTESTED. Breusler v. Arnold, i Wis. 764; Brannon v. Hursell, 112 Mass. 63 

PBOTBACTED. Knight v. Wilder, 2 Cush. 210. 

PBOVABIiE. debt. In statute. Re Schwartz, 14 Blatchf. 196; Sigsby v, 

Willis, 3 Ben. 374. 

under bankruptcy. Crew v. Terry, 2 C. P. Div. 403. 



PBOVE. his debt. In statute. Re Bigelow, 2 Ben. 483. 

which he could . In charter-party. Gether v. Capper, 15 C. B. 

39; 15 C. B. 697. 

PBOVED. not . In statute. Queen v. Robinson, 12 Ad & Ell. 673. 

PBOVTDE. or prepare the means fat. Charge to Grand Jury, 5 McLean, 

306. 

PROVIDED. Stanley v, Colt, 5 Wall. 119; Carroll z/. State, 58 Ala. 396. 

In statute. Burgwyn v. Whitfield, 81 N. C. 263; Chapin v. Harris, 8 
Allen, 596. 

In will, Colt V. Hubbard, 33 Conn. 281. 

always. Heaston v, Commrs., 20 Ind. 398. 

In will, Martelli v, Holloway, L. R., 5 H. L. 533. 

she has no lawftQ issue. In will, Wright v. Denn» 10 Wheat 

204. 

PBOVISIOE'. Quincy v. Rogers, 9 Cush. 291. 



PROVISION, 287 PUBLIC. 



PBOVISION — Continued. 

or artiole of Ibod. In statute, Boteler v. Corporation, 2 

Cranch C C. 676. 

any by will. In statute, U. S. v, Duncan, 4 McLean, 100. 

FBOviniONAL. remedy. In statute. Noonen v, Orton, 28 Wis. 386; Nosser 

V, Corwin, 36 How. Pr. 540; McCarthy v, McCarthy, 54 How. Pr. 
97. 
In statute, Hamilton v, O'Neil, 9 Mo. 1 1 ; Crooke v. Slack, 20 Wend. 
117; Plummer v. Currier, 52 N. H. 288; McLester v, Somerville, 
54 Ala. 670. 

FBOVISIONS. as may be Ibtmd on hand for fbmily uae. In statute. State 

V, Connor, 73 Mo, 572. 

for fbmily use. In statute. Atkinson v. Catcher, 23 Ark. loi. 

or mnnitiona of war. In statute. U. S. v. Barber, 9 Cranch, 

243; U. S. V, Sheldon, 2 Wheat. 119. 

oom, Ibdder, meat and other on hand. In will, Mooney v, 

EvanSi 6 I red. (Eq.) 363. 

PROVISO. Carroll v. State, 58 Ala. 396; Wayman v. Southard, 10 Wheat. 30; 

Voorhees v, U. S., 10 Pet. 449. 

PROVOKE. stir up or contention and strife. In statute. State v, Warner, 

34 Conn. 276. 

PROXIMATE. Insurance Co. v. Boon, 95 U. S. 11;. 

oause. State z/. Railroad, 52 N. H. 528. 

PRUDENTIAL. oonoems. In statute, Willard v, Newburyport, 12 Pick. 227. 

PI7BUC. In statute. Town of Hamden z/. Rice, 24 Conn. 351. 

act. Lassly v, Fontaine, 4 Hen. & M. 146 (4 Am. Dec. 510) ; 

Unity V, Burrage, 13 Otto, 454; Portsmouth Livery Co. v, Watson, 
10 Mass. 91 ; Burnham v. Webster, 5 Mass. 266; U. S. v. Porter, i 
Cranch C. C. 369 ; Bank of Utica v, Smedes, i Cow. 662 ; Pierce v, 
Kimball, 9 Me. 54; Morgan v, Cree, 46 Vt. 773; Village of Wi- 
nooski V, Gookey, 49 Vt. 282. 

annual office or charge. In statute. King v. Inhabitants, i 

B. & Ad. 795. 

assembly. In statute. Summerlin v. State, 3 Tex. (App.) 441. 

benefit. Tyler v, Beecher, 44 Vt. 648 (8 Am Rep. 398). 

blockade. The Circassian, 2 Wall. 135. 

~r— buildings. In statute. Queen v. Carruthers, 4 B. & S. 817; 
Babcock v, Goodrich, 47 Cal. 488 ; State v. Troth, 34 N. J. (L.) 377. 

corporation. Dartmouth College v. Woodward, 4 Wheat. 518; 



Sayre v. North-western Tp. Co., 10 Leigh, 454; Dean v, Davis, 51 
Cal. ^d6 ; Turnpike Co. v. Wallace, 8 Watts, 316 ; Dearborn v, Bos- 
ton, etc., R. Co., 4 Fost. (N. H.) 179 ; Ten Eyck v, Delaware, etc.. 
Canal Co., 3 Harr. (N. J.) 200 (37 Am. Dec. 233). 

— debt. Morgan v. Cree, 46 Vt. 773. 

— document. In statute, Grindell v, Brendon, 6 C. B. (N. S.) 698 ; 
Fleming v, Newton, i H. L. Cas. 363 ; Blunt v. Patten, 2 Paine, 393 ; 
McCall V, U. S., I Dakota Terr. 328. 

— dues. Anderson v, Thompson, 10 Bush, 132. 

duties. In statute. Reg. z/. Guardians, 17 Q. B. 156; Mayor v. 
Overseers, 17 Q. B. 859. 



F UBLia 288 P UBLIC. 

^XJBLLO — Continued. 

employment. Brown v. Shevell, 2 Ad. & Ell. 143. 

enemy. State v. Moore, 74 Mo. 413. 

exhibition of feats of hareemanahlp. U. S. v. Buffalo Park, 

16 Blatchf. 189. 

gambling house. In statute, Lockhart v. State, 10 Tex. 275 ; 

Rice V, State, 10 Tex. 545 ; Buck v. State, i Ohio St. 61. 

ground. In deed. Town of Lebanon v. Comm*rs, 9 Ohio, 80(34 

Am. Dec. 422). 

highways. Toledo, etc., R. Co. v. Pence, 68 III. 524; Coe v. 

New Jersey R. Co., 28 N. J. (Eq.) 100; Koelle v. Knecht, 99 111. 403. 

house. In deed. Com. v, Cuncannon, 3 Brewst. 344 ; Pease 7. 



Coats, L. R., 2 Eq. Cas. 688. 

In statute. Smith v. State, 37 Ala. 472 ; Bass v. State, 37 Ala. 469 ; 
Brown v. State, 27 Ala. 47; Huffman v. State, 29 Ala. 40; Mooxe v. 
State, 30 Ala. 550; Burnett v. State, 30 Ala. 19; Wilson v. State, 31 
Ala. 371; Bently v. State, 32 Ala. 596 ; Shilhagan v. State, 9 Tex. 43a 

improvement. In statute. City of New Haven v. Whitney, 36 

Conn. 373. 

indeoenoy. In statute, McJunkins v. State, 10 Ind. 140 ; Jen- 
nings V, State, 16 Ind. 335 ; State v, Huey, 16 Ind. 338. 

lamp-posts. Im contract, Davenport, etc., Co. v, Davenport, 



13 Iowa, 229. 

— lands. In statute, Newhall v, Sanger, 2 Otto, 761; Haydenfeldt 
V, Davey, etc., Mining Co., 10 Nev. 290. 

— law. See Public Act. 

— library. In statute. Providence Athenaeum v. Tripp, 9 R. I. 
560; 8 R. I. 39. 

— looal law. In constitution. County Comm'rs v. Comm'rs^ 51 

Md. 457 ; County Comm'rs v, Meekins, 50 Md. 28. 

— lots. In town plot. Rutherford v. Taylor, 38 Mo. 315. 

— minister. U. S. v. Benner, Baldw. 234. 

— money. In statute. Branch v. U. S., 12 Ct. of CI. 281. 

— offloe. Re Hathaway, 71 N. V. 238 ; People v. Common Connal. 



77 N. Y. 503. 

— offlper. Armitage v. Hamer, 3 B. & Adol. 795. 



In statute. Morse v. City of Lowell, 7 Mete. 1 52 ; Hayman v. Pond, 7 
Mete. 329 ; Mitchell v. Nelson, 49 Ala. 88 ; State v. Bradley, 48 
Conn. 546. 

or ol^ootionable purpose. In lease, Gannett v. Albree, 103 

Mass. 374. 

peaoe and order. In statute, Neuendorff v. Durjrea, 6 Daly, 276. 

paroehial ftmds. In statute. King v. Inhabitants, 3 B. & AdoL 



725. 

— plaoe. In deed. Carter v, Abshire, 48 Mo. 301. 



In statute, Williams v. State, 64 Ind. SS3 (3i Am. Rep. 135) ; State v. 
Weekly, 29 Ind. 206 ; Eastwood v. Miller, L. R., 9 Q. R 440 ; Bows 
V. Fenwick, L. R., 9 C. P. 337 ; Henderson v. State, 59 Ala. 89 ; Reg. 
V. Cruesden, 2 Camp. 89; Reg. v. Webb, i Den. C. C. 338 ; Fanner 
V. Com., 8 Leigh, 741; Coleman v. State, 13 Ala. 602; Flake v. 



P UBLIC. 289 P UBLIC. 

• 

FUBIJC ^ Continued. 

State, 19 Ala. 551; Campbell v. State, 17 Ala. 369; Smith v. State, 
52 Ala. 384; Walker v. Com., 2 Va. Cas. 515 ; Arnold v. State, 29 
Ala. 46; Burnett v. State, 30 Ala. 19; Huffman v. State, 30 Ala. 
532; Wilson V. State, 31 Ala: 371; Moore v. State, 30 Ala. 550; Bent- 
ley V, State, 32 Ala. 596 ; McDonald v. State, 35 Ala. 390 ; Smith v. 
State, 23 Ala. 39 ; Bythword v. State, 20 Ala. 47 ; Coleman v. State, 
20 Ala. 51 ; Clarke v. State, 12 Ala. 492; Burdine v. State, 25 Ala. 
60; Sherwood v. State, 25 Ala. 78 ; Roquemore v. State, 19 Ala. 528 ; 
Com. V. Vandine, 6 Gratt. 689; Purcell v. Com., 14 Gratt. 679; Com. 
V, Feazle, 8 Gratt. 585; Windsor t/. Com., 4 Leigh, 680; Shihagan v. 
Steele, 9 Tex. 430 ; Mofit v. State, 43 Tex. 346 ; Cainile v. State, 35 
Ala. 392 ; Scammon v, Scammon, 28 N. H. 428 ; Tidd v. Smith, 3 N. 
H. 181; Taylor v. State, 22 Ala. is ; Reg. v. Holmes, 3 C. & K. 360; 
Reg. V, Orchard, 3 Cox C. C. 248 ; Queen v. Harris, L. R., i C. C. 
282 ; Reg. V. Thallman, i Leigh & C. 326 ; Rex v, Watson, 2 Cox C. 
C. 376; Russell V. Dyer, 40 N. H. 73 ; 43 N. H. 396; Cahoon v. Coe, 
57 N. H. 556; re Birch, 15 C. B.744; re Freestone, i Hurl. & N. 94; 
Hill V. Balls, 2 Hurl. & N. 300 ; Henderson v. State, 59 Ala. 91 ; 
Phillips V, State, 51 Ala. 20; Napier v. State, 50 Ala. 169; Ray z/. 
State, 50 Ala. 172. 

printing. Ellis v. State, 4 Ind. i. 

purpose. In statute. Mitchell v. Burlington, 4 Wall. 270; Rog- 
ers z/. Burlington, 3 Wall. 654; Reg. v. Guardian, 17 Q. B. 156; 
Mayor v. Overseers, 17 Q. B. 859. 

purposes. In will, Dolan v, Macdermott, L. R., 5 Eq. Cas. 60. 

revenue. Morgan v. Cree, 46 Vt. 773. 

roed. King v. Wright. 3 B. A Ad. 681; King v. Mellor, i B. & 

Ad. 38. 

roads. In statute. Buncombe Tp. Co. v, Baxter, 10 Ired. (L.) 222. 

— sale. In statute, Robbins v, Bellas, 4 Watts, 258. 

— schools. Merrick v, Amherst, 12 Allen, 508 ; Jenkins v, Andover, 
103 Mass. 97. 

— seaL Kirksey v. Bates, 7 Port. 529 (31 Am. Dec. 722). 

— seonrities. Morgan v, Cree, 46 Vt. 773. 
seourity. In stcUute, U. S. v, Irwin, 5 McLean, 183. 

— square. In statute, Westfall v. Hunt, 8 Ind. 174 ; City of Lo- 
gansport v, Dunn, 8 Ind. 378. 

— - statutes. See Public Act. 

— Btooks. In statute. Wells v. Porter, 2 Bing. N. C. 722 ; Hewitt 
V. Price, 4 Man. & G. 356. 

— Btooks and securities. Hall v, Middlesex Comm*rs, 10 Allen, 
100. 

— street, highway and sidewalk. In indictment. State v. 
Moriarty, 74 Ind. 103. 

— street or road. In statute. Case v. Storey, L. R., 4 Ex. 319. 

— taaces. In statute, Morgan v, Cree, 46 Vt 773. 

— taxes, rates and assessments, /if statute, Buffalo City Cen. 
Co. V, Buffalo, 46 N. Y. 506. 

— trade. Gibson v, Ireson, 3 Q. B. 44. 

— trade or business. In deed, Wickenden v. Webster, 6 El. & 



Bl. 387. 
37 



PUBLIC. 290 PULSE. 

PUBLIC — Continued. 

trust. In constitution. Re Oaths, 20 Johns. 462 ; Se3rmoar v. 

Ellison, 2 Cow. 29, note, 

use. Orr v, Quimby, 54 N. H. 590 ; Hildreth v, Adamson, 8 C. 



B. (N. &) 594. 

In constitution, Walther v, Warner, 25 Mo. 277 ; Board of Education 
V, Hackman, 48 Mo. 243; Buffalo ^ N. Y. R. R. v, Brannan, 9 N. 
Y. 100; Bradley v. New York, etc., R. Co., 21 Conn. 294; Fisher v, 
Horicon Iron, etc., Co., 10 Wis. 354 ; New Orleans, etc., R. Co. v. 
R. Co., 53 Ala. 211 ; Com. v, Horrigan, 2 Allen, 159: Chambers v, 
Satterlee, 40 Cal. 497 ; Railroad Co. v. City of Stockton, 41 Cal. 149 ; 
Channel Co. -z/. R. Co., 51 Cal. 269; Gilmer z/. Lime Point, 18 CaL 
229; Com. V, Tewksbury, 11 Mete. 55; Manufacturing Co. v. Head, 
56 N. H. 386 ; Olmstead v. Camp, 33 Conn. 532 ; Beekman v, Sara- 
toga, etc., R. Co., 3 Paige Ch. 45 (22 Am. Dec. 679) note; Memphis 
Freight Co. v, Memphis, 4 Coldw. 419; Enfield Toll Bridge Co. v, 
Hartford, etc., R. Co., 17 Conn. 42. 

In statute. Jennings v. Pierce, 15 Blatchf. 42. 

use and sale. Ryan v, Goodwin, 3 Sumn. 514. 

weUbre. Shaver v. Starrett, 4 Ohio St. 494 ; Sessions v. Crim- 

keton, 20 Ohio St 349. 

work ereoted or in progreaB of erection. In statute, City- 



Sewerage Utilization Co. v. Board of Health, i l^, G^z, 402. 

— works. In statute. Seibert v. Cavender, 3 Mo. (App.) 423 ; re 
Public Works, 13 Fla. 699. 

— worship. Att'y-Gen. v. Merrimack Manfe. Co.,- 14 Gray, 586. 



in assembly. In statute. Smith v. State, 63 Ala. 57. 

PUBIJCATIOir. Re Newall, 4 C. R (N. S.) 269; Wenman v. Ash, 13 C. B. 840 ; 

Swindle v. State, 2 Yerg. 581 (24 Am. Rep. 515); Hodges v. State, 5 
Humph. 112. 

In statute. Boucicault v. Wood, 2 Biss. 34 ; Crowe v. Aiken, 2 Biss. 

208. 
In statute. Myers v. Callaghan, 5 Fed. Rep. 730. 

other . In statute. U. S. v. Williams, 3 Fed. Rep. 484- 

place of . In statute. Leroy v. Jamison, 3 Sawy. 377- 

FUBLIBH. In plea. Watts v. Greenlee, 2 Dev. (L.) 118. 

make and ready to be delivered. In order. Brooke v. Mitch- 

ell, 6 M. & W. 473 (8 Dowl. 392). 

FUBUSHED. Doe v. Burdett, 4 Ad. & Ell. 17. 

In contract. Stoops v. Smith, 100 Mass. 63 ; Palmer v. Clark, 106 Mass. 

387. 
In statute. Boucicault v. Chatterton, 5 Ch. Div. 281; Musselbrook 
V. Dunkin, 9 Bing. 605 ; Macarthur z'. Campbell, 5 B. & Ad. 518. 

one regularly . In statute. Walton v. Harris, 73 Mo. 491. 

printed and . In plea. Sproul v. Pillsbury, 72 Me. 20. 

signed and . In deed. Vincent v. Bishop of Soder, 8 C. R 905 ; 

Johns V. Dickinson, 8 C. R 934. 

In will. Curteis v. Kenrick, 3 M. A W. 461. 
PUBUSHEB. Sproul v. Pillsbury, 72 Me. 20. 

PUEBLO. Indian. U. S. v. Joseph, 4 Otto, 614 ; 4 Sawy. 599 i^ioie). 

PULSE. stock of . In statute. Rex v. Woodward, i Moody, 323. 



PUNCTUATION. 291 PURPORT. 

PUNCTUATION. Ewingz/. Burnet, 11 Peters, 41. 

PujiihHABTiTi. In statute. Com. v, Pemberton, 118 Mass. 36 ; McLaughlin's Case, 

107 Mass. 225. 

PUNISHMENT. Stote v, Lawrence, 45 Mo. 492 ; U. S. v. Ulrici, 3 Dill. 532. 

PUNTPIVB. damages. Chiles z/. Drake, 2 Mete. (Ky.) 147. 

In instructions of court. Roth v, Eppy, 80 111. 283. 

PUBCHASE. Durando v. Durando, 23 N. Y. 331 ; Kohl v, U. S., i Otto, 367; Green 

V. Blanchar, 40 Cal. 194 ; Clay v. Wyatt, 6 J. J. Marsh. 584. 

In statute, McCartee v, On)han Asylum, 9. Cow. 437 (18 Am. Dec* 
516); Clayz'. Wyatt. 6 J. J. Marsh. 584; Durando v, Durando, 23 
N. Y. 331 ; Burt 2/. Merchants' Ins. Co., 106 Mass. 360 ; Farring- 
ton V. Wilson, 29 Wis. 383 ; King v. Townrow, i R & Ad. 479 ; Blake 
V. Attersoll, 2 B. & C. 879 ; King v. Inhabitants, 4 B. & Adol. 1 52 ; 
Commercial Bk. v, Nolan, 8 Miss. 508 ; Jackson v. Brown, 5 Wend. 
590 ; Gordon v. Preston, i Watts, 385 ; Pierson v, Laurence, 2 
Blatchf. 495. 

— money. In statute, Austin v. Underwood, 37 111. 438 ; Hoyt v. 
Van Alstyne, 15 Barb. 568; Eyster v. Hatheway, 50 111. 521; 
Henisler v, Nickum, 38 Md. 270 ; Davis v. Peabody, 10 Barb. 91 ; 
Allen V, Hawley, 66 111. 164 ; Smith 7/. Lackor, 23 Minn. 454. 

actual . In statute, Pierson v, Laurence, 2 Blatchf. 495. 

by . In statute, Farrington v, Wilson, 29 Wis. 384. 

FUBCHASED. Smith v. Spies, 2 Hall, 477 ; Curtis v, Burdick, 48 Vt. 166. 

In will. Askew v. Booth L. R., 17 Eq. Cas. 426. 

FUBGHASER^ In statute. Draper v, Bryson, 26 Mo. 108 ; Steele v, Spencer, i Pet. 

552 ; Halbert v, McCullock, 3 Mete. (Ky.) 456 ; Lancaster v, Dolan, 
I Rawle, 231 ; Dillingham v. Bolt, 37 N. Y. 198 ; Schmidt v, Hoyt. 
I Edw. 652; Meyer V. Car Co., 12 Otto, 9; Bank v, Frank, 45 N. Y. 
(S. C.)404 ; re Hopper, 2 Halst. Ch. 325 ; Gilpin t^. Davis, 2 Bibb, 416 
(5 Am. Dec. 622); Lancaster!/. Dolan, i Rawle, 231 (18 Am. Dec. 
625). 
or inoumbranoer. In statute. Wood v. Chapin, 13 N, Y. 509. 

bona fide . In statute. Cloud 1/. Dupree, 28 Ga. 170; Sanderson 

V, McAffee, 42 Ga. 250. 

anbeequent . In statute. Van Rensselaert/. Clark, 17 Wend. 25. 

FITBGHASEBS. In statute. Fowler v. McCartney, 27 Miss. 509. 

for a valuable oonaideratioxi without notioe. In statute. 

Wailes v. Cooper, 24 Miss. 208. 

of inoumbranoes. In statute. Turner v. Pabb, 60 Mo. 342. 



anbeequent . In statute, McNitt v. Turner, 16 Wall. 352; 

Henderson v. Downing, 24 Miss. 106. 

FUXtCELASING. building or . In will. Chapman v. Brown, 6 Vesey, 404. 

— pubUo charity. In constitution, Burd Orphan Asylum v. Upper 
Darby School District, 90 Pa. St. 21; Cleveland Library Association 
V, Pelton, 36 Ohio St. 253. 

andembessle. In statute. Carpenter v. Mason, 12 Ad. & Ell. 



630. 

FUSPOBT. Cora, v, Wright, i Cush. 46 ; State v, Bonney, 34 Me. 383 ; State v, 

Witham, 47 Me. 195 ; State v, Wimberly, 3 McCord, 190 ; State v, 
Molier, i Dev. 263; State v. Carter, Conf. N. C. 210; State v, 
Crawley, 13 La. Ann. 300 ; Chamberlain v. State, 5 Blackf. 573; 
Com. V, Parmenter, 5 Pick. 279. 



JPURPeRT. 



2g2 



QUANTITY, 



PUBFOBT — Continued. 

In indictment. Com. v. Wrif^ht, i Cush. 65 ; State v. Atkins, S Blackl 
458 ; Flowers v. Bitting, 45 Ala. 448. 

FUBFOBTBD. In indictment. Com. v. Twitchell, 4 Cush. 76. 

PUBFOBTING. In statute. Snow v. State, 14 Wis. 482. 

that any money will be paid. In statute. State v.Page, 19 

Mo. 213. 

In statute. Rex t/. Heffcrnan, i Jebb, 4. 

of obtaining. In^tatute. King v. Ridgway, 5 B. & Aid. 55a 

of profit. In statute. Bear v. Bromley, 18 Q. B. 271. 

of prostitution or oonoubinage. In statute. State v. Feasel, 

74 Mo. 524. 

In statute. Carter v. State, 17 Ind. 307 ; Fahnestock v. State, 23 Ind. 

231. 
artfully and firamed. In plea. Kerr v. Force, 3 Cranch C. C. 8. 



FUBPOaS. 



I. Atty.-Gen. v. Evart Booming Co., 34 Mich. 402 ; Moore v, Jack- 
son, 2 Abb. N. C. 211. 

FUBSUAKCB. in of the aot. In statute. Smith v. Shaw, 10 B. & C. 284 

FUBSUAHT. 

FUBSUTF. 
FUT. 



to the act. In indictment. U. S. v. Latorre, 8 Blatchf. 13$. 

to law. In statute. Woodruff v. Barney, i Bond, 531. 

In statute. King v. Hart, 6 B. & S. 253. 

in foroe. In statute. North-Eastem R. Co. v. Mayor, 9 R & S. 

630. 
in her poosesaion. In will. Breckenridge v. Duncan, 3 A K. 

Marsh. 50 (12 Am. Dec. 359). 

into writing. In statute. Queen v. Registers, 7 Q- ^ '5^ 

out. Perry v. Fitzhouse. 8 Q. B. 757. 



FUTS. 



FUTTINO. 



Ex parte Young, 6 Biss. 53 ; re Chandler, 9 Bankr. Reg, 514 ; Pi*ley v. 

Boynton, 79 III. 351. 
out. In statute. Queen v. Inhabitants, 1 1 Ad. & Ell. $S7- 



QUALIFICATION. State v. Seay, 64 Mo. 89. 

In statute. U. S. v, Williams, i Dill. 485. 
QUALIFICATIONS. In constitution. Hall v. Hostetter» 17 B. Monr. 78$ ; Com. v. 

Jones, 10 Bush, 744. 

of an elector. In statute. Byrne v. State, 12 Wis. 519. 



QUALIFIED. 



QUANTITY. 



In constitution. Hall v. Hostetter, 17 B. Monr. 785; Com. v. Jones, 
10 Bush, 744. 
In statute. People v. Supervisor, 100 111. 332. 

elector. Sanford v. Prentice, 28 Wis. 358. 

suooessor. In statute. Beebe v. Robinson, 64 Ala. 171. 

Com. V. O'Connell, 12 Allen, 453. 

In statute. Scattergood v. Tutton, 2 Fed. Rep. 28. 

and quality. In deed. Adams v. Fothcringham. 3 Mass. «5* 

(3 Am. Dec. 151). 

and quality unknown. In bill of lading. Tully v. Terry, L R.» 

8 C. P. 679. 
guaranteed. In bill of lading. Bissell v. Campbell, 54 ^- ^* 



353. 



QUANTITY. 



293 



RACE 



QUAITPITY — ConUnued. 

, deflolenoy in . In bill of lading. Meyer v. Peck, 28 N. Y. 590. 

whole . In statute. Scattergood v, Tutton, z Fed. Rep. 28. 

QTJABBYING'. right to do all such . In lease. McKee v. Brooks, 20 Mo. 526. 

QTJABT. larger quantity than one . In statute. Sappington v. Carter, 

67 111 . 482. 

QTJABTEBIiT. In lease. Guardians v. Guardians, 6 B. & S. 918. 

— aooonnt. In guarantee, Melville v, Hayden, 3 B. & Aid. 595. 

of oom* In statute. Master of St. Cross v. Ld. Howard, 6 



QUARTERS. 

QUARTS. 
QUASL 



Term Rep. 338. 

In statute. Bensusan v. Murphy, 14 Blatchf. 536. 

corporation. Riddle v, Merrimac River Locks, 7 Mass. 169; 

Inhabitants v. Wood, 13 Mass. 193; Levy Court v, Conner, 2 Wall. 
501. 

derelict. Sturtevant v. The George Nicholaus, i Newb. 449. 



QUAY. 
QUESTIOir. 



Mayor v, U. S., 10 Pet. 662. 

of fhot. Loviner v. Pearce, 70 N. C. 167. 

-of title of real estate. In statute, Murray v. Van Derlyn, 24 

Wis. 67. 
— of title to real property. In statute, Spencer v. Winselman, 
42 Cal. 481. 

tooohing the said impriaonment or pnniahment. In statute. 



U. S. V, Daniel, 6 Wheat. 542. 

ahall be in • In statute, Latham v. Spedding, 17 Q. B. 440. 

QUESTIOjnj&u. has not been . In statute. Queen v. Inhabitants, 12 Ad. & Ell. 

182. 



QUI. 



haeret in litera, haeret in oortioe. Tracy v, Troy, etc., R. Co., 

38 N. Y. 433 ; Booth v. Williams, 2 Ga. 252. 

a'exonaey a'aoonae. Stephens v. People, 19 N. Y. 569. 

tarn. O' Kelly v. Athens Manfg. Co., 36 Ga. 51. 

with child. Reg. v.Wycherley, 8 C. A P. 262 ; Goldsmith's Case. 

3 Camp. 76 ; State v. Cooper, 2 Zabr. 52 ; Rex v, Russell, i Moody, 
356 ; State v. Smith, 32 Me. 369 ; Com. v, Reid, i Leg. Gaz. 182. 

In indictment. Com. v. Parker. 9 Mete. 600 ; and see Hall v. Hancock, 
15 Pick. 255 (26 Am. Dec. 599). 

-with child. Reg. v, Wycherley, 8 C. & P. 262. 

and peaoeable iXMMeasion. In deed. Xkerly v, Vilas, 23 Wis. 



QITIETIiY. 
QUIT. 



QUOTA. 



207. 

exgoy. In deed, Whitbeck v. Cook, 15 Johns. 483 (8 Am. Dec. 

272). 

In deed, Gordon v. Haywood, 2 N. H. 402. 

Grindley z/. Barker, i Bos. & Pul. 229; Withnellt^. Gartham, 6 T. R. 
388. 

In statute. Queen v. Inhabitants, 4 B. & S. 256 ; State v. Wilkes- 
ville, 20 Ohio St. 288. 

of any city or town. In statute. Inhabitants v. Inhabitants, 

97 Mass. 383. 

field. In statute. Com. v. Wilson, 9 Leigh, 648. 

public . In statute. Ash v, Lynn, 7 B. & S. 255. 



I^ACEWAY, 



aw 



RAPE. 



BACEWAY. 



BAGH3. 

BAHJirG. 

BAILBOAD. 



BAILBOAB8. 
RAILWAY. 



HAINY. 



RAISED. 



RAISING. 



RAliBOM. 



In died. Wilder v, DeCou, 26 Minn. 10. 

State V. Pinchback, 2 Mill (S. C.) 130. 

In insurance policy, Elliott v, Hamilton Ins. Co., 13 Gray, 139. 

In statute, Muuson v. Town of Derby, 37 Conn. 31a 

St. Louis, etc., R. Co. v. North-western, etc., R. Co., 2 Mo. (A pp.) 69 ; 
Munkins z/. Kansas, etc., R. Co., 60 Mo. 334. 

In statute. Lake Superior, etc., R. Co. v, U. SI, 3 Otto, 442; John- 
son V, Louisville, etc., R. Co., 10 Bush, 231 ; Louisville, etc, R. 
Co. V, Louisville, 2 Duv. 175 ; Black v, Philadelphia, etc., R. Co., 
58 Pa. St. 249 ; State v, Johnson, Phill. (L.) 140 ; Com. v, Haverhill, 
7 Allen, 524. 

oompanies. In statute. County of Randolph v. Post, 3 Otto, 

509 ; Moneypenny v. Sixth Avenue R. Co., 4 Abb Pr. (N. S.) 357. 

company. In statute. Tucker v, Ferguson, 22 Wall. 527. 

oorporationB. In statute. City of Dubuque v. Chicago, etc, 

R. Co., 47 Iowa, 196. ; First Nat. Bk. v. Da vies, 43 Iowa, 424. 

track. In statute, Chicago, etc., R. Co. v. People, 98 III. 354. 



In statute, St. Louis Bolt & Iron Co. v, Donahoe, 3 Mo. (App.) 559 ; 
Chicago V, Evans, 24 111. 52. 

Phipps V, Daubney, 16 Q. B. 524 ; Imlay v. Union Branch R. Co., 26 
Conn. 254 ; St. Louis R. Co. v, Nprth-westem St Louis R. Co., 2 
Mo. (App.) 69. 

corporatioxi. In statute. Union Trust Co. v. Kendall, 20 Kas. 

515. 
the . In statute, Garton v, Bristol R. Co., 4 Hurl. & N. 48 ; 

4 Hurl, k N. 832 ; 6 Hurl, k N. 930 ; Directors v, Garton, 8 H. L. 

Cas. 477. 

days. In charter-party, Balfour v, Wilkins, 20 Alb. L. J. 161. 



In will, Bateman v, Bateman, i Atk. Ch. 421. 

and school all the testator's children. In will. Shoemaker v. 

Stobaugh, 59 Ind. 598. 

and support armies. In constitution. U. S. v, Fairchild, i Abb. 



(U. S.) 74. 
provided $6,000 shall be 



In subscription paper. New London 



Inst. V. Prescott, 40 N. H. 330. 

to be out of my estate. In will. Bray v. Lamb, 2 Dev. (Eq.) 

372 (25 Am. Dec. 718). 

Reg. V. Whipp, 4 Q. B. 145. 

Bryant v. Foot, 7 B. A S. 725. 

Maisonnaire v. Keating, 2 Gall. 325. 

•Reg. V, Lloyd, 7 C. A P. 318 ; Reg. v. Stanton, i C. & K. 415 ; Reg. 
V, Case, I Den. C. C. 580 ; Reg. v. Wright, 4 F. & F. 967 ; S, t^. A.. 
39 L. T. (N. S.) 128 ; Lord Audley's Case. 12 Mod. 340 ; i How. St 
Trials, 387 ; Reg. v. Russen, i East P. C. 438 ; R^. v. Allen, 9 C. 
& P. 31 ; Reg. V. Jordan, 9 C. A P. 118; R^. v. Gammon. 5 C. A 
P. 321 ; Reg. V. Hughes, 9 C. A P. 752 ; Reg. v. McRue, 8 C. & P. 
641 ; Reg. v. Lines, i C. A K. 393; Reg. v. Fletcher. 8 Cox C. C. 
131 , Reg. V. Lock, L. R., 2 C. C. R. 10; Reg. v. Hallett, 9 C. A. 
P. 748; Reg. V. Jones, L. R., 2 C. C. R. 10 ; Reg. v. Woodhurst, 12 
Cox C.C. 443; Reg. V. Martin, 9 C. A P. 213; Reg. v. Johnson, 10 
Cox C. C. 114 ; Reg. v. Read, i Den. C. C. 377; Com. v. Merrill. 



RAPE, 295 RAPE. 

— Continued. 

14 Gray, 415 ; Smith v. State, 12 Ohio St 466; State v, Hagerman, 
41 Iowa, 151 ; State v, Erickson, 45 Wis. 86 ; Hull v. State, 22 Wis. 
580 ; Com. V. Fogerty, 8 Gray, 489 ; Williams v.* State, 14 Ohio, 222 ; 
Blackburn v. State, 22 Ohio St. 102 ; Penn v, Sullivan, Add. 143 ; 
Stout 7/. Com., 11 S. & R. 177 ; State v, Knapp, 45 N. H. 148; Com. 
V. Burke, 105 Mass. 376; People z/. Dohring, 59 N. Y. 374 ; People 
V. Morrison, i Park. C. C. 626; Anderson v. State, 41 Wis. 430 ; 
State z/. Ruth, 21 Kas. 138 ; Turners. People, 33 Mich. 363 ; Hays 
V. People, I Hill, 351 ; O'Mearaz^. State, 17 Ohio St. 515 ; Moore v. 
State, 17 Ohio St. 521; State t/. Cross, 12 Iowa, 66 \ People z/. Mc- 
Donald, 9 Mich. 150; State v, Tarr, 28 Iowa, 397; Don Moran 
V, People, 25 Mich. 356 ; Walter v. People, 50 Barb. 144 ; 
State V, Crow, 10 West. L. J. 501; Croswell v. People, 13 Mich. 426; 
People V, Metcalf, i Wheel. C. C. 378 ; State v. Shepherd, 7 Conn. 
54 ; State z/. Stoj'all, 54 Me. 24 ; Com. v» McDonald, no Mass. 455; 
Reg. V. Sweenie, 8 Cox C. C. 223 ; Reg. v. Barrow, L. R., i C. C. 
156 ; Reg. V. Young, 14 Cox C. C. 114; Reg. v, Camplin, i C. & K. 
746; Reg. V, Page, 2 Cox C. C. 133; Higgins v. People, i Hun, 
307; Reg. V. Flattery, 13 Cox C. C. 388; Reg. v, Myers, 12 Cox 
C. C. 311 ; Reg. v. Pressy, 10 Cox C. C. 635 ; Reg. v. Barrett, L. R., 
2 C. C. 81 ; Reg. v. Saunders, 8 C. & P. 265 ; Reg. v, Williams, 8 C. 
ii P. 286 ; Reg. V. Clark, Dears. C. C. 397 ; Taylor v. State, 50 Ga. 
79; McNairt'. State, 53 Ala. 453; Dawson z/. State, 29 Ark. 116; 
Bradley v. State, 32 Ark. 704 ; State v, Johnson, 69 N. C. 55 ; State 
V. Hargrave, 65 N. C. 466; Com. v, Thomas, i Va. Cas. 307 ; State v, 
Leblanc, 3 Brev. 339; Waller v. State, 40 Ala. 325; Davis t/. State, 
43 Tex. 189 ; Thompson v. State, 43 Tex. 583; Stephen v. State, u 
Ga. 525 ; State v. Burgdorf, 53 Mo. 65 ; State v. Murphy, 6 Ala. 765 ; 
Charles v. State, 6 Eng. (Ark.) 389 ; Auschicks v. State, 6 Tex. 
(App.) 524 ; Pleasant v. State, 3 Ark. 360 ; Wyatt v. State, 2 Swan, 
394; Lewis V. State, 30 Ala. 54; Walter 7/. State, 40 Ala. 325; 
Crockett v. State, 49 Ga. 185 ; Jenkins v. State, i Tex. (App.) 346 ; 
State V. Handy, 4 Harr. 566 ; Davenport v. Com., i Leigh, 588 ; 
Laurence v, Cx>m., 3 Gratt. 845 ; State v, Tilman, 30 La. Ann. 245 ; 
Com. V, Fields, 4 Leigh, 648 ; Carter v. State, 35 Ga. 263 ; State v. 
Brooks, 76 N. C. I ; State v. Green, 2 Wh. St. Med. Jur. 267 ; Com. 
V. Berle, 2 Wh. St. Med. Jur. 245; People v, Quinn, 50 Barb. 128 ; 
People V. Royal, 53 Cal. 62 ; Wesley v. State, 65 Ga. 732. 

assaiQt with intent to commit . People v, McDonald, 9 Mich. 

1 50 ; Reg. V. Stanton, i C. & K. 41 5 ; Reg. v. Case, i Den. C. C. 
580; Reg. V, Lloyd, 7 C. & P. 318 ; Reg. v, Dungey, 4 F. & F. 99 ; 
Reg. V, Lock, L. R.. 2 C. C. R. 10 ; Reg. v. Connelly, 26 U. C. Q. 

B. 323 ; Reg. «/. Day, 9 C. & P. 722 ; Reg. t/. McGararan, 6 Cox C. 

C. 64 ; Reg. V, Fich, 16 U. C. C. P. 379 ; Hays v. People, i Hill, 
3$i ; Com. v. Thompson, 116 Mass. 346; State v, Vadnais, 21 Minn. 
382; Com. V, Merrill, 14 Gray, 415 ; Smith v. State, 12 Ohio St. 446 ; 
Hull V, State, 22 Wis. ; Garrison v. People, 6 Neb. 274 ; Preisher v. 
People, 47 III. 382; Hayes z/. People, i Hill, 351 ; Carter v. State, 
35 Ga. 263 ; State v. Neely, 64 N. C. 425 ; Com. v, Stratton, 114 Mass. 
303 ; People v, Carmichael, 5 Mich. 10; State v. Johnston, 76 N. C. 
209 ; State V. Pickett 11 Nev. 255 ; State v. Brooks, 76 N. C. i ; 
Walters. People, 50 Barb. 144 ; Clark v. State, 30 Tex. 448; Reg. 
V. Bennett, 4 F. & F. 1105 : People v, Brunsby, 32 N. Y. 525 ; Reg. 
V, Flattery, 13 Cox C. C. 388 ; Com. v. Fields, 4 Leigh, 648 ; Pleas- 



RAPE. 



296 



REAL. 



BASCAIi. 
BATABUS. 



BATE. 



— Continued 

ant V. State, 3 Ark. 360 ; State v. Cross, 12 Iowa, (^\ R^.t^. Hallett, 
9 C. & P. 748; Reg. z/. Wright, 4 F. & F. 967 ; Joicev. SUte, 53 Ga. 
80 ; State v* Montgomery. 63 Mo. 296 ; Lewis v. State, 35 Ala. 380 ; 
State V, Elich, 7 Jones (N. C), 68. 

Brown v, Mims, 2 Mil) (S. C.) 235. 

polls. Opinion of the Justices, 7 Mass. 523. 

proi>6rty. In statute. Queen w. Overseers, 10 B. & S. 327. 

value. In statute, Darrow v, Langdon, 20 Conn. 294. 

In marine policy. Insurance Co. v, Wright, i Wall. 456. 

In statute, Burlington, etc., R. Co. v. Lancaster Co., 4 Neb. 293 ; People 
V, Dolan. 36 N. Y. 59 ; King v. Inhabitants, i B. & Ad. 250 ; State v. 
Utter, 5 Vroom, 489. 

made and levied. In statute. Queen v, Eyton, 3 El. & BL 391. 

of &re. In statute. Chase v, N. Y. Cent. R. R., 26 N. Y. 523. 



BATED. 



BATIPT. 



BATING. 



f:|:ii 



ro. 



BAW. 

BEAD. 
BEADY. 



In statute, Reg. v. Rose, 6 Q. B. 1 56 ; Goodhew v, Williams, 3 C P. 
Div. 382. 

taxes and dutiee. In lease, Curtis v. Pierce, 115 Mass. 186; 

Blake v. Baker, 115 Mass. 188. 

Barker v. Berry, 8 Mo. (App.) 449. 

oonflrmed and made valid. In statute. Barker v, Chester- 
field, 102 Mass. 129. 

Smith V, Kelly, 13 Mete. 309; Clough v, Clough, 73 Me. 488. 

oonflrm, and make valid. Barker v, Chesterfield, 102 Mass. 

128. 

In marine policy. Insurance Co. v, Wright, i Wall. 456. 

Harperz/. Deep, 3lnd. 225. 

In indictment. People v, Quinn, 50 Barb. 128 ; Davis v. State, 42 Tex. 
226. 

In statute. State v, McComas, 11 Mo. 117. 

Com. V, Fogerty, 8 Gray, 490. 

aoow. In plea. Harper t/. Delp, 3 Ind. 230. 

hides and skins. In statute, Coggill v, Lawrence, i Blatchf. 

604. 
In constitution, Weill v, Renfield, 54 Cal. iii. 

and willing. In plea, Cort v, R. Co., 17 Q. B. 142. 

for sea. In insurance policy, Pettigrew v, Pringle, 3 R & Adol. 



520; Graham v, Barias, 5 B. &. Adol. 1019. 

to pay. Mitchell v. Gregory, i Bibb, 449 (4 Am. Dec. 655), 

BEADY-MADE. — • dothing. In contract. Vance v. Bloomer, 20 Wend. 196. 
REAL. — 



— action. In statute. Blood v. Kemp, 4 Pick. 172 ; Plympton 9. 
Baker, 10 Pick. 473 ; Dummer v. Foster, 7 Mass. 476 ; Crocker v. 
Block, 16 Mass. 448. 

— oost. In statute, U. S,v, Sixteen packages, 2 Mason, 53 ; Tap- 



pan V, U. S., 2 Mason, 399. 

estate. Hine 7/. City of New Haven, 40 Conn. 484 ; Bowman tf. 



People, 82 111. 246. 

In assignment, Chautauque Bk. v. White, 6 N. Y. 236. 

In statute. Bowman v. People, 82 III. 247 ; Portland, etc., R. Co, v. 
Saco, 60 Me. 196; People v. Assessors, 39 N. Y. 81 ; Jenkins 9. 



REAL, 297 REASONABLE. 

— Continued. 

Fahey, 73 N. Y. 355 ; Nutter v. Russell, 3 Mete. 164; People v. New 
York Tax Comm'rs. 82 Y. N. 459. 

In will Williams v, Evans, El. A Bl. 728 ; Moare v. White, 3 Ch. 
Div. 763. 

— estate held by an executor or adminiatrator. In statute. 
Ex parte Blair, 13 Mete. 127. 

estate of her hiubaad. In statute. Willet v. Brown, 65 Mo. 1 38. 

estates. In wilL Wilson v! Eden, 18 Q. B. 475. 

party in interest. In statute, Hutchins v. Weems, 35 Mo. 

28s ; Chew v. Brumagen, 13 Wall. 497. 

property. Wall v. Fairly, ^^ N. C. 105. 

securities. In deed. Re Boyd, 14 Ch. Div. 626. 



HKATiTCTl In contract, Lorillard v. Silver, 36 N. Y. 578 (35 Barb. 132). 

collect or . In contract. Hall v, Henderson, 84 III. 61 1. 

B33AIJZED. first money and goyemment script • In contract, Stanford v. 

Greene, 18 Iowa, 218. 

KHATiM. depart the • In statute, Williams v, Nunn, i Taunt. 270; 

Wyndham v, Patterson, 4 Camp. 288. 

IfBAIt. Keening v, Ayling, 126 Mass. 404. 

in the thereof. In will. Read v, Clarke, 109 Mass. 82. 

BS-ABBAIV'GE. In statute. Visant v, Knox, 27 Ark. 272. 

BSASON. good to apprehend an attack. In statute. Hardin v. State, 63 

Ala. 38. 

BBASONABLS. Marquis of Salisbury v. Gladstone, 7 Hurl. & N. 1049. 

amoxuit of property. In constitution. Phelps v, Rooney, 9 

Wis. 701. 

amoxuit of salvage. In statute. Beardnell v. Belson, 9 B. & S. 

324. 
attorney's f)»e. In statute. Missouri, etc., R. Co. v, Shirley, 

20 Kans. 660. 

care. , Neal v. Gillet, 23 Conn. 443. 

care and skilL Cunningham v. Hall, 4 Allen, 268. 

caoso. In statute, Toof z^. Martin, 13 Wall. 40 ; Osgood v. Nel- 



son, L. R., 5 H. L. 636 ; Swift v. Jewsbury, L. R., 9 Q. R 560 ; re 
Franklin Telegraph Co., 119 Mass. 447; Butler z/. Butler, 4 Pa. L. 
J. Rep. 284. 

— cause of seisure. In statute. Stacey v, Emery, 7 Otto, 645. 

— compensation. In assignment. Campbell v. Woodworth, 24 
N. Y. 304. 

— diligence. Windham Bk. v. Converse, 22 Conn. 215. 

— doubt. Jarrell v. State, 58 Ind. 293 ; U. S. v. McKee, 3 Cent. L. 



38 



J. 95; U. S. V, Babcock, 3 Cent. L. J. 143; Com. «/. Costley, 118 
Mass. I ; Donnelly v. State, 26 N. J. L. 615; Arnold v. State, 23 
Ind. 170; Miller v. People, 39 111. 458 ; U. S. v, Butler, i Hughes. 
457; Mickey v. Com.. 9 Bush. 593 ; People v, Cline, 44 Mich. 290; 
State v. Reed, 62 Me. 129; Coleman v. State, 59 Ala. 53; IJ ,S.v. 
Knowles, 4 Sawyer, 520; State z/. Moan, 55 Iowa, 220; State v. 
Hennessey, 55 Iowa, 300; State v, Kearley, 26 Kas. 77. 

— efS>rts to efEbot personal service. In statute. Flower t^. Allen, 
2 H. & C. 688. 



REASONABLE. 298 RECEIVED, 

BBASONABLE^ Continued. 

notice. In statute. Corpenny v, Sedalia, 56 Mo. 88 ; Jameson 

V, Bancroft, 20 Kans. 169. 

rate. In statute, Chicago, etc., R. Co. v. People, 67 111. 11 ; 



Campbell v. Marietta, 23 Ohio St. 168. 

— regulatioiiB. In statute. McAndrew v. Electric Tel. Co.. 17 C. 
B. 3. 

— reward. In contract, Muir v. Canal Co., 8 Dana, 161. 
time. Bell V. St. Louis, etc., R. Co., 6 Mo. (App.) 363 ; Loring 



m:^! 



V. City of Boston, 7 Mete. 4x39 ; Seymour t^. O'Keefe, 44 Conn. 150; 
Woodruff V, Plant, 41 Conn. 344; Nunez t/. Dantel, 19 Wall. 560; 
Wiggins V, Binkham, 10 Wall. 129; Wood v, Milwaukee, etc. R. 
Co., 27 Wis. 541 ; Boothby v. Scales, 27 Wis. 626; Broadwell v. But- 
ler, 6 McLean, 296 ; Imhof! v, Chicago, etc., R. Co., 20 Wis. 344; 
Cameron v* Wells, 30 Vt. 633. 

In plea, Taylor v. Clay, 9 Q. B. 713. 

In statute. Bishop v, O'Connell, 56 Mo. 158. 

on request. In contract, Illinois Land Co. v, Beem, 2 Brad- 
well, 390. 

SEASONS. for audh appeal. In statute. Nelson z/.CIoughland, 15 Wis. 392. 

JEUBSBUIU). In deed, Burkelow v, Maurer, 3 Rawle, 482. 

BjslbuUjDING. effectually and repairing. In lease. Doe v. Withers, 2 R 

& Ad. 904. 

BEBUmNG. Yeaton v. Chapman, 65 Me. 126. 

Reg. V, Overton, Dears. C. C. 308; Rex v, Harvey, Russ & Ry. 227; 
Scholey v, Welsby, Peake, 24; Krutz v, Craig,- 53 Ind. 561 ; Staple- 
ton V. King, 33 Iowa, 28 ; Pauley v, Weisart, 59 Ind. 241 ; Knob- 
lauch V, Kronchnabel, 18 Minn. 306; Western Trans. Co. t'. Bar- 
ker, 56 N. Y. 544; Keggjz/. State, 10 Ohio, 75. 

In indictment, Reg. v, Martin, i Moody C. C. 483 ; Rez v, Tesich, 2 
East P. C. 925 ; Reg. v, Rogers, 9 C. A P. 41 ; Reg. v, Boardman. 2 
Moody A R. 147; Reg. v, Goldstein, Russ. A Ry. 423 ; Reg. v, Har- 
vey, Russ. & Ry. 227 ; Reg. v. West, 2 C. A K. 496; Reg. v. Hun- 
ter, 2 Leach C. C. 624; Reg. v. Pries, 6 Cox C. C. 165; Com. % 
Lawles, loi Mass. 32 ; Clark v. State, 8 Ohio St. 630 ; State v. Hum- 
phreys, 10 Humph. 442; Reg. v, French, L. R., i C. C. R. 217; 
Clark V, Newsam, i Ex. 131 ; Reg. v. West, 1 Den. C. C. 258; State 
V, Bibb, 68 Mo. 286. 

In statute, Horton v. State, 53 Ala. 429 ; Com. v, Talbot, 2 Allen, 161. 

or aoquittanoe. In statute. Rex v, Harvey, i Russ. A Ry. 227. 

upon the thereof. In deed. Smith v, Nesbett, 2 C. B. 286. 

In statute, Wright v, Wilkerson, 41 Ala. 267. 

warehouae . In statute, Tenni v, McNamee, 45 N. Y. 614. 

BECK! V ABLE. In will. Minors v, Battison, i App. Cas. 428. 
BECEIVE. Harlow v, TuRs, 4 Cush. 448. 

In statute, Bailey v, Ogden, 3 Johns. 399 (3 Am. Dec. 509). 

subBoriptioiUi. In statute, Boyd v. State, 61 Ala. 197. 

BEOEIVED. In statuU, Selden v, EquiUble Trust Co., 4 Otto, 422. 

In will. Minors v, Battison, i App. Cas. 428 ; West v. Miller, L. R-« 
6 Eq. Cas. 59. 

value . In note, Clayton v. Gosling, 5 R & C. 362. 



m:^! 



RECEIVES. 299 RECOVERED. 

more than his jiut share. In statute, Henderson v, Eason, 



17 Q. B. 712. 

BECKIVING. /// statute, Atty.-Gen. v. King, 5 Price, 195. 

y holding and managing. In charter. Proprietors of White 

School-House v. Post, 31 Conn. 242. 

BBCITE. In statute, Ogden v, Walters, 12 Kans. 283. 

BECITING. the names of the parties. In statute, Wilhite v, Wilhite, 53 

Mo. ^\, 

BEOOGNIZANCE. State v, Weatherwax, 12 Kans. 463; State v, Houston, 74 N. 

C. 549; Banta v. People, 53 111. 434. 

BBCOGHIZED. British ship. In statute. The Andalusian, 3 Prob. Div. 183. 

BECOUiECT. In plea, Talbott v, Sebree, i Dana, 56. 

BECOMMEND. Malim v, Keighley, 2 Ves. Jr. 333. 

In verdict. Lewis v. State, 51 Ala. i. 
BECOirSTBUCnOir. in statute, Keferstein v, Linkton, 52 Mo. 233. 
BEOOBD. Barnes v, Lee, i Cranch C. C. 430 ; Ordway v, Ordway, 4 Wis. 45. 

In statute, Dunn v, Gaines, i McLean, 321. 

of the action. In statute. People v. Trim, 37 Cal. 274. 

of the French or Spanish governments. In statute, Charlotte 

V, Chouteau, 21 Mo. 590. 

Of wiU. In statute. Hill v, Crockford, 24 N. Y. 128. 



registry and , In indictment. Ream v. Com. 3 S. & R. 207. 

In statute, Fairbanks v, Davis, 50 Vjt. 251. 

by the derk. In statute. Re Coleman, 15 Blatchf. 417. 

it shall be considered as when received. In statute, Jones 

V, Parker, 73 Me. 251. 

BSOOBJD6. and judicial proceedings of every other State. In constitution. 

Aldrich v, Kinney, 4*Conn. 380 (10 Am. Dec. 151). 

BJBOOUP. Ives v. Van Epps, 22 Wend. 155. 

BSCOUFMENT. Davenport v, Hubbard, 46 Vt. 201. 

BSCOUBSE. without . Epler v. Funk, 8 Pa. St. 468 ; Watson v. Cheshire, 18 

Iowa, 202 ; Richardson v, Lincoln, 5 Mete. 201 ; Rice v. Steams, 3 
Mass. 225 ; Upham v. Prince, 2 Mass. 14; Johnson v, Nunnerly, 30 
Ark. 153; Dumont v. Williamson, 18 Ohio St. 515. 

In statute. Sawyer v. Inhabitants of Northfield, 7 Cush. 495 ; Brooks 
V. Rigby, 2 Ad, & Ell. 21 ; Philpott v, Jones, 2 Ad. & Ell. 42 ; Davey 
V, Reuton, 2 B. & C. 712 ; Keene v, Deble, 3 B. & C. 493 ; Stevens v. 
Chapman, L. R., 6 Ex. 213; Parrz/. Lillicrap, i H. & C. 616; Ash- 
croft V, Foulkes, 18 C. B. 270; Touge v, Chadwick, 5 El. & Bl. 950 ; 
Gowens v, Moore, 3 Hurl. & N. 540. 

In contract, Ogden v, Des Arts, 4 Duer, 275 

In statute. Reg. v, Mainwaring, i EL. B. & El. 480; Hewitt v, Cory. 
L. R., 5 Q. B 418. 

— in pnrsuanoe of information given. In statute. Lapham v, 
Olney, 13 Allen, 301. 

or preserved. In statute. The Phillipine, L. R.. i Adm. & Ecc. 

309. 

or preserved through his instrumentality. In statute. Cat- 



low V, Catlow, 2 C. P. Div. 367. 
property . In statute. Birchall v, Pugen, L. R..mo C. P. 397. 



KECOVERS, 300 REGULAR. 



In statute. Beard v. Perry, 2 B. & S. 493 ; Boulding v, Tyler, 3 B. & S^ 

473. 
Douglass V, Reynolds, 7 Pet. 113 ; Jones v. Walker, 2 Paine, 688. 

In statute, Hewitt z^. Wilcox, i Mete. 154; Wenham v, Essex, 103 
Mass. 117. 

aotion for the of land. In statute, Gledhill v. Hunter, 14 Ch. 

Div. 493. 

on of the property and oonyiotion of the ofibndar. In offer of 

reward. Fletcher v, England, 3 C. B. 255. 

BECKUITING. — - ezpenaes. In statute. Fowler v. Selectmen, 8 Allen, 80. 

BECnFIESB. In statute. Re Distilled Spirits, 3 Ben. 70. 

BEDSEHABIiE. In contract, Swasey v. R. Co., 1 Hughes, 17. 

KBDEUVEB. or restore the property in the same oondition or pU^pht. 

Levy V, Dyers, 3 Cent. L. J. 221. 

BEDEMFnOlf. Mayer v. Farmers' Bank, 44 Iowa, 212. 

In contract, Swasey z^. R. Co.^ i Hughes, 17. 

BE-ENIJSTED. In statute. Barker v, Chesterfield, 102 Mass. 1291 

BJ&b'JLNE. U. S. V. Pennington, i Pet. C. C. 113. 

BEFINED. ooal or earth oils. In insurance policy. Bennett v. North 

British Ins. Co., 81 N. Y. 273 {37 Am. Rep. 501). 

BEFBESHMENT. In statute. Howes v. Board, i Ex. Div. 385. 

saloon. State v, Hogan, 30 N. H. 268. 

publio — ^ and entertainment. In statute. Taylor v. Oram, i H. 

& C. 370. 

■ 

BEFUSAIi. In statute. Inhabitants of New Marlborough v. County Comm'rs, 9 Mete 

432. 
of the premises. In lease. Tracy v. Albany Exchange Co., 7 

N, Y. 472. 

suoh . In statute, Matthews v, Offey, 3 Sumn. 121 . 

of a trade, business or mannffeKStory. In statute. Highman v. 

Wright, 2 C. P. Div. 391. 

the payment of In mortgage. Parish v, Wheeler, 22 N. Y. 494. 

to be oarried. In statute. Simpson v. Reuton, 5 B. & Adol. 39. 



if regularly protested and when due. In note. Mitchell 9. 

Baring, 10 R & C. 10. 

shall be given or . In statute, Harringer v. Greb, 42 Mo. 44. 

BSGABD. with to all the oiroumstanoes of the oase. In statute. Queen 

V. Lords, etc., 10 Ad. & Ell. 179. 

BEQISTEB. In statute. The Mohawk, 3 Wall. 566. 

in bankruptcy. In statute. Re Comstock, 8 Ben. 235 . 

BEGISTEBED. companies. In statute, Bowes v. Directors, 1 1 H. L. Gas. 3891 

BSGISTBATIOlf. In statute. Re Supervisors of Election, i Fed. Rep. i. 

for the purpose of admission to . In statute. Robertson 9. 

Sullivan, 2 Yerg. 91. 

BEGISTBY. U. S. v. Castillero, 2 Black, 17. 

KBGUIiAB. People v,. Wilson, 72 N. C. 155 ; Myers v. Rasbeck, 4 How. Pr. 83. 

oourse of business. Roberts v. Hall, 37 Conn. 205 (19 Am. 

Rep. 308). 

In statute. State v. Conrades, 45 Mo. 17. 



REGULAR. 301 REGULATION. 

BBQUIiAB— Continued. 

minister. In statute. Queen ?/. Oldham, to B. &'S. 196. 

sessioiui. In statute. Bethel v, Comm'rs* 60 Me. 535 ; Waterville 

V, Kennebec, 59 Me. 80. 

station. R. Co. v, Flagg, 43 111. 364. 

survey. In marine policy. Dorr v. Pacific Ins. Co., 7 Wheat. 

582; Janney v. Coluibbian Ins. Co., 10 Wheat. 411 ; Haff 7/. Marine 
Ins. Co., 8 Johns. 163, 

turn. In contract. Lawson v, Burness, i H. & C. 396. 

turns of loading. In charter-party, Leidermann v. Schultz, 

14 C. B. 39. 

BBGUIiABIiY. employed. In statute, Wilson v. Gray, 127 Mass. 98. 

given in fbr taxes. In statute, Macon, etc., R. Co. v. Little, 45 

Ga. 370. 

licensed. In statute. Bone v. State, 63 Ala. 185. 



In statute, U. S. v, Harris, i Sumn. 37. 

and oontroL In statute, McConvill v. Mayor, 39 N. J. (L.) 38. 

oommeroe. In constitution. Steamship Co. v, Portwardens, 6 

Wall. 31 ; City of New York v, Miln, 1 1 Peters, 102 ; Dounham v, 
Alexandria, 10 Wall. 173 ; Gibbons v, Odgen, 9 Wheat, i ; State v. 
Wheeling Bridge Co., 18 How. 421 ; Conway v, Taylor, i Black, 603; 
Smith V, Turner, 7 How. 283 ; Nathan v, Louisiana, 3 How. 73 ; 
Henderson v. Mayor of New York, 2 Otto, 259 ; Chy Lung v. Free- 
man, 2 Otto, 275; South Carolina v, Georgia, 3 Otto, 9; U. S. v, 
Holliday, 3 Wall. 407 ; Paul v. Virginia, 8 Wall. 168; Freight Tax, 
etc.. Cases, 15 Wall. 232 ; Brown v. State, 12 Wheat. 419. 

oommeroe with the Indian tribes. In constitution. U. S. v. 

Bailey, i McLean, 236 ; U. S. v, Cisna, i McLean, 256. 

ferries. In stcUute, Minturn v, Larue, 23 How. 435 ; Duckwall 



V, New Albany, 25 Ind. 283. 

— or prohibit. In statute. City of Keokuk v. Dressell, 47 Iowa, 

598. 

— or suppress bawdy houses. In statute. State v, DeBar, 58 



^o- 395 * State v, Clark, 54 Mo. i. 

— sales of auotioneers and transient meroh^nts. In statute, 
Oskaloosa v, Tullis, 25 Iowa, 44. 

— streets. In city charter, Goszler v, Georgia, 6 Wheat. 593. 

— the polioe. In city charter. City of St. Louis v, Bentz, 11 Mo. 
62. 

— the sale of liquor. In statute, Williams v. State, 48. Ind. 306. 



ereoty repair and publio wharves. In statute. City of Han- 
nibal V, Winchell, 54 Mo. 172. 

license, tax, and haokney oarriages, etc In city charter, Lo- 
gan V, Pyne, 43 Iowa, 524. 

BEQITIjATnrG. the rate of interest on money. In constitution, McChesney 

V, People, 99 111. 216 ; Holmes v. Smythe, 100 111. 420. 

In statute, Reg. v, Robinson, 17 Q. B. 470. 

of the business of the association, and the oonduot of its 

offloers. In statute, BuUard v. Bank, 18 Wall. 589. 

polioe . U. S. V, Dewitt, 9 Wall. 41. 



REG ULA TIONS. 



302 



REM. 



BEQUIiATIOirS. In statute. Harvey v. U. S., 3 Ct. of CI. 38. 

relating to health. In statute. Com. v, Fahey, 5 Cush. 409. 

BEHEABING. Emerson v, Davies, i Woodb. & M. 21. 

BEHCBUBSE. In contract, Philadelphia, etc., Ins. Co. v. Audenreid, 83 Pa. St i% 

In statute, O'Neale v. Caldwell, 3 Cranch C. C. 313. 
In statute. Trustees of Newcastle v. R. Co., 5 Hurl. & N. 178. 
daim . In statute. Rez v. Mayor, i Q. B. 460. 



BEIKSTATE. 



REJECTED. 

RELATE. 

RELATED. 

RELATING. 

RELATION. 



RELATIONS. 



RELATIVE. 
RELATIVES. 



RELEASE. 



RELEVANCY. 
REL 



In statute, Thacher v, U. S., 15 Blatchf. 18. 

to either party. In statute. Gill v. State, 61 Ala. 170. 

to the parties. In statute, Newman v. State, 49 Ala. 13. 

to her migesty'a revenue. In statute. Queen v, Bakewell, 7 

El. & Bl. 849. 

In statute. Re Pfuelb, 48 Cal. 643 ; Esty v, Clark, loi Mass. 36 (3 
Am. Rep. 320); Cleaver v. Cleaver, 39 Wis. 96 (20 Am. Rep. 30); 
Kimball v. Story, 108 Mass. 382. 

of the testator. In statute, Kimball v. Story, 108 Mass. 382. . 

having to her sole and separate property. In statute. Rove 

V, Smith, 45 N. Y. 230 ; Baum v, Mullen, 47 N. Y. 577. 

In will, Hibbertz/. Hibbert, L. R, 15 Eq.Cas. 373; Eagle v. Breton, 
L. R., 15 Eq. Cas. 149; Crosby v, Clare, i Amb. 397; Varrell v, 
Wendell, 20 N. H. 431. 

of the H. ftmily. In will, Huling v, Fenner, 9 R. I. 410. 

proportions. In statute. Com. v, Newburyport, 103 Mass. 134- 

In statute. Monroe Co. v. Teller, 51 Iowa, 670. 

In will, Hagardine v, Pults, 27 Mo. 423 ; Drew v, Wakefield, 54 Mc. 
291 ; Hfbbert v. Hibbert, L. R., 1 5 Eq. Cas. 373 ; Eagles v, Lc Breton. 

L. R., 1 5 Eq. Cas. 149. 

» 

nearest . In will, Ennis v. Pentz, 3 Bradf. 382. 

Ladrick v, Briggs, 105 Mass. 510; Mitchell v, Pratt, Taney, 448; Pal* 
mer v. Bates, 22 Minn. 532. 

In deed, Altringer v, Capehart, 68 Mo. 441 ; Jackson v. Fish, 10 Johns. 

456 ; Lynch v, Livingston, 6 N. Y. 422 ; Lord Welleslcy v. Withers, 

4 El. & Bl. 757. 
Adams v. Floyd, 3 Hurl. & N. 360. 
In statute, Litton v, Litton, 3 Ch. Div. 793. 
— ^ of the poor. In will, Wilkinson v. Malm, 3 Cromp . & J. 637. 



RELIGION. 



BEUGIOtJS. 



, morality and knowledge. In constitution. Board of Educa- 
tion V. Minor, 23 Ohio St 211. 
In statute, Reg. v, Jones, 8 Q. B. 725 ; Queen v, Pocock, 8 Q. K?^ 

books or reading. In will, Simpson v. Welcome, 72 Me. 49^- 

profession and worship. In constitution. Ex parte Andrews, 

18 Cal. 678. 

sentiments or persuasions. In constitution. Flolickstein v. 



Mayor, 40 Ala. 727. 

society. Silsby v. Barlow. 16 Gray, 330; Weld v. May, 9 Gush. 

188. 
BELINQUISH. In plea. Home v. Booth, 3 Man. & G. 740. 
KELOCATE. Hyde Park v, Commrs.. 117 Mass. 416. 

proceedings in . Bartero v. Real Estate Bk., 10 Mo. (App.) 7^ 



REMAIN, 



303 



RENT 



RKTJfTATN. 



inviolate. In constitution, Gaston v, Babcock, 6 Wis. 504. 

upon any sidewalk to the annoyanoe of any person. In city 

ordinance. State v. Goulding, 44 N. H. 285. 

REIKAINDEB. In devise, Wright v, Denn, 10 Wheat. 204; Fowler v, Depau, 26 

Barb. 224; France's Estate, 75 Pa. St 220; Jul! v, Jacobs, 3 Ch. 
Div. 703 ; Dewey v, Morgan, 18 Pick. 295. 

oontingent .City of Peoria v. Darst, 101 IlL 6ro. 

vested . Poor v, Considene, 6 Wall. 455; Cuyler v, Ferrill, 

I Abb. (U. S.) 169. 

BEMAimNG. oanse ^untried. In statute, Preston v, Englert. 5 Binney, 390. 

BBMAINS. what then . In will, Foote v. Landers, 72 Mo. 616. 

Re letter. 78 N. Y. 601 ; re Cooper, 22 N. Y. 67. 

right of a oomxnon law . In statute. The Belfast, 7 Wall. 624. 

as a . In will. Bubb v, Yelverton, L. R., 13 Eq. Gas* 131. 

release and quitolaim. In deed. Lynch v, Livingston, 6 N. 



BSMIT. 



BEHTTTEB. 



BBMOVING. 
BJBNDEBED. 



BSNSWAIi. 



BENEWED. 



BENEWDTG. 



Y. 422. 
In statute, Jungbluth v, Redfield, 4 Blatchf. 220. 
In deed. Maclen v, Sunderland, 3 El. & Bl. 44. 
Daniell v. ^^oodroffe, 10 M. & W. 608. 
In statute, Reg. v. St. Ebbes, 12 Q. B. 140. 
In statute, Barre v. Inhabitants, i Pick. 129. 
of suoh person firom the state. In statute. 



Fute V, James* 46 
In insurance policy. Marsden v. Ass. Co.» L. 



Vt6o. 

breakage during 

R., I C. P. 233. 

firom. In statute. Bates v. State, 31 Ind. 72. 

Perry V. Fitzhouse, 8 Q. B. 757. 

fbr oonsumption. In statute, U. S. v, A Quantity of Tobacco* 

6 Ben. 162. 
firom oi&oe. Bowerbank v. Morris, Wall. C. C. 19. 

aotually out of the oounty. In statute, Johnson v. Lowry, 

47 Ga. 560 (15 Am. Rep. 655). 

In statute, Thomas v, Crark, 65 Me. 296 ; Blatchford v. Newberry* 
100 111. 491. 

servioes . In contract, Grabb v. King, 38 Cal. 143. 

In statute, Daggett v, Daggett, 124 Mass. 149. 

Greene v, Lowry, 46 Ga. 55. 

In contract, Pitts v. Hall, 3 piatchf. 203; Goodyear v. Gary; 4 
Blatchf. 271 ; Wilson v, Rosseau, i Blatchf. 53. 

In deed. Insurance Building Assn. v. National Bk., 71 Mo. 60; Ran- 
let V, Cook, 44 N. H. 512. 

In bin of exchange, Russell v, Phillips, 14 Q. B. 892. 

fbr three months. In note. Central Bk. v, Willard, 17 Pick. 

150 (28 Am. Dec. 285). 
and reviving. Bank of Washington v. Nock, 9 Wall. 373. 



Taylor v, Evans, i Hurl. & N. 104 ; Hancock v, Austen, 14 C. B. (N. 

S.)634. 
In statute. Re Hill, 6 Ch. Div. 63 ; Sheffield Water Works Co. v, 

Bennett, L. R., 8 Ex. 196; Lord Zouche v, Dalbrac, L. R., 10 Ex. 



A 



RENT. 



304 



REPORT 



BENT — Continued . 

172; Sheffield Water Works v. Bennett, L. R, 7 Ex. 409; Angell v. 
Angel], 9 Q. B. 3S5 ; Sparker v. Cook, 16 N. Y. 567. 

or serrioe. In constitution. Parsell v, Stryker, 41 N. Y. 4801 

Stephens v, Reynolds, 6 N. Y. 454. 

payable. In statute. Brown v. Cockney, 9 B. ft S. 508 ; L R., 

3 Q. B. 67a. 

to beoome due. Martin v. Campbell, lao Mass. 126. 

to . Halbut V. Forest City, 34 Ark. 246. 



BBNTAIiS. 

BSNTED. 
BENTIKG. 

BBirro. 



BBPAIBED. 
&EPAIBING. 



In statute. Smith v. Eastern R. Co., 124 Mass. IS4 : Eastern R. Co. v. 
Rogers, 124 Mass. 527. 

Zurk V. Grant, 25 Ohio St. 352. 

In statute. King v. Inhabitants, 5 B. & Adol. 545. 

In bond. Wilson v. Unselt, 12 Bush, 216. 

and proflta. Re Rector, L. R., 11 Eq. Cas. is ; Hall v. Carter,! 

Atk. 358 ; Duke of Leeds v. Powell, i Ves. Sr. 171. 

In will. Re Voss, 13 Ch. Diy. 504; Schermerhome v. Schermer- 
home, 6 Johns. Ch. 70 ; Allen v. Backkouse, 2 Ves. Sl R 67. 

iaauea and profits. Heartly v. Beaum, 2 Pa. St 16$. 

or proilta. In statute. Evelyn v. Whichand, i El., B. & El. 131. 

Levy V. Dyess, 3 Cent L. J. 221 ; Todd v. Rowley, 8 Allen, 58. 

In deed. Beach v. Crain, 2 N. Y. 86 ; Mcintosh v. Sonn, 49 Barb. 550. 

In statute. Blood v. Bangor, 66 Me. 1 54. 

and renew. In contract. Dwight v. Ludlow Manfg Co., 12S 

Mass. 280, 
good, tenantable . Lt lease. Thorndike v. Burridge, in Mass. 

531. 
out of . Campbell v. City Council, 53 Ala. S3o. 

any building btdlt or . King v. Davenport, 98 111. 306. 

lease. In wilL Easton v. Pratt, 2 H. & C. 680. 

In contract. Darby t^. Farrow, i McCord, 517. 

In statute. Reg. v. Consistory Ct, 12 C. B. (N. S.) 240 ; Queen v, 
Consistorial Ct, 2 B. & S. 360; Stockwell v. Inhabitants, no Mass. 
305 ; People v. City of Brooklyn, 21 Barb. 484; re Fulton Street 29 
How. Pr. 429; Stephens v. Miller, 24 N. J. (Eq.) 358; Hartford, etc 
R. Co. V. Grant, 9 Blatchf. 543. 

. In deed. Beach v. Crain, 4 N. Y. 86. 



BEPABATIOH'. In will Attorney-General v. Master Wardens, L. R.. 6 H. L. i. 
BEPASSING. privilege of passing and . Miles v. Douglass, 34 Conn. 394. 



BSPAVING. 



BEPLEVnr. 



In statute. Re Phillips, 60 N. Y. 16; re Brady, 85 N. Y. 271. 
In statute. Robertson v. Demoss, 23 Miss. 301. • 

extreme and omelty. In statute. Embree v. Embree. S3 HI. 

394. 
Gralloway v. Bird, 4 Bing. 299 ; Mennie v. Blake, 6 El. ft Bl. 351 : it 

Wilson, I Sch. ft Lef. 320; Meanyz^. Head, i Mason. 319. 

the fiuita and their doings. In statute. Post v. Williams, 33 

Conn. 147. 

to the oourt. In statute. Attorney-Greneral v. Charleston, 105 

Mnss. 277. 



REPORTED. 



305 



RES. 



BEPOBTED. BhaU be 



to the oompaay. In insurance policy, Edwards v. 



Mississippi Valley Ins. Co., i Mo. (App.) 192. 

Cooper V, Landon, 102 Mass. 60. 

'ATION. Kimball i/.iEtna Ins. Co., 9 Allen, 540 ; Dewees v. Manhattan 
Ins. Co., 34 N. J. (L.) 244. 

lTiVjbi. In statute, Davis v. Davis, 26 Cal. 23 ; McCray v. McCray, 12 
Abb. Pr. i; Lee v. Dill, 39 Barb. 516; 16 Abb. Pr. 92; Guery z/. 
Kinsler, 3 S. C. 423; Buckingham v, Andrews, 34 Barb. 434; 
Schenck v, Warner, 37 Barb. 258; Traphagen v, Traphagen, 40 
Barb. 537. 

BEFBBUDfTATIVXS. In insurance policy. Loos v. John Hancock Ins. Co., 41 Mo. 

533 ; Wason v. Col born, 99 Mass. 342. 

legal . In deed, Bryan v. Wear, 4 Mo. 106 ; Cox v. Curren, 118 

Mass. 198. 

In contract, Hammond v. Mason & Hamlin Organ Co., 2 Otto, 724; 
Hamilton v, Kingsbury, 1 5 Blatchf. 67. 

In policy of insurance. People v, Phelps, 78 111. 147. 

In will, Gourden v, Shrewsbury, 1 1 S. C. 2. 

personal . In statute, Hagen v, Kearn, 3 Dill. 124 ; Atkinson v. 

DufiFy, 16 Minn. 45; Dennick v, R Co., 13 Otto, 19. 

Sterling v. Drake, 29 Ohio St. 457. 

and pardons. In constitution. Ex parte Wells, 18 How. 307. 



BEFBIEVX. 
BEPBIEVBB. 



In statute, Rossiter v. Hall, $ Blatchf. 363. 

HEFBISBS. In statute. Queen v, Shaw, 12 Q. B. 421. 

BEFUTATION. Knode v, Williamson, 17 Wall. 586; Marts v. State, 26 Ohio St. 162; 

Cooper V, Greeley, i Denio, 347. v 

Prentice v, Whitney, 1 5 N. Y. (S. C.) 300. 

In statute, Reg. v, Thomas, 8 C. & P. 292 ; Reg. v, Willoughby, 2 East 
P. C. 944 ; Reg. V, Taylor, i C. & K. 213 ; Reg. v, Mitchell, 2 F. ft 

F.44. 
In will, Eddy v, Hartstone, 34 N. J. (Eq.) 419. 

to pay. In statute. Queen v, Kay, L. R., i C. C. R. 260. 

I you will give oredit. In letter, Bradbury v, Morgan, i H. ft 



C. 240. 
when tnereto 



In bond, Jones v. Cooper, 2 Aikens, 54 (16 Am. 



Dec. 678). 
by mail. In insurance policy, Lothrop v, Greenfield Ins. Co., 2 



KE8QX7IBED. 



BSQTJISn*IOn. 



Allen, 82. 

Prentice v. Whitnoy, 15 N. Y. (S. C.) 300. 

in writing. In statute. Ronton v. Lacy, 17 Mo. 399. 

the person having auoh right of action Ibrthwlth to oon^ 

menoe suit. In statute, Lockridge v, Upton, 24 Mo. 184. 

In contract, Whitehouse v. Liverpool Gas Co., 5 C. R 803. 

In statute. King v. Inhabitants, 8 B. ft C. 3$ ; Directors v. May, L^ 
R., 7 H. L. 283. 

to testify. In statute. State v, McCord, 8 Kans. 232. 

of a physician. In statute. Bain v. State, 61 Ala. 78. 



89 



— a^judioata. Atchison, etc., R. Co. v, Commrs., 12 Kans. 127. 

— gestSB. Riddle v. State, 49 Ala. 389; Smith v. State, 53 Ala. 487 ; 
Carter V. Buchanan, 3 Ga. 513; Jewell v, Jewell, i How. 219; Wil- 
liams V, State, 4 Tex. CAnp.) 9; Booth v. State, 4 Tex. (App.) ao2. 



RESCIND. 306 RESIDENCE. 

RESCIND. In contract. Weil v, Jones, 53 Cal. 46. 

In plea. Hochster v, De La Tour, 2 El. & Bl. 686. 

BESEMBLE. or pass fbr. In statute. Reg. v. Bradford, 2 Cr. & Dix, 41. 

BESEBVATIOH'. Miller v, Lapham, 44 Vt. 416. 

or limitation. In statute. Miller v, Bascom, 28 Mo. 352 ; Balke 

V, Swift, 53 Mo. 85. 

BESEBVE. Tn statute. U. S. v. Hare, 4 Sawyer, 653. 

without . In notice of sale, Warlow v, ^Harrison, i El. & El. 295. 

In deed, Hickox v, Parmlee, 21 Conn. 86. 

, due or made payable. In statute. Dibble v. Bowater, 2 El. & 

Bl. S69. 

public square. In town plat, Daniels v. Wilson, 27 Wis. 492. 

taken or received. In statute, Brickett v, Minot, 7 Mete. 294. 

the use of said tract of land. In will, Logan v. Caldwell, 23 



Mo. 372. 

BESEBVING. In deed, Sloan v. Lawrence Furnace Co., 29 Ohio St. $68 ; Stockwell 

V. Couillard, 129 Mass. 231 ; Barnes v. Burt, 38 Conn. 541 ; Stock- 
bridge Iron Co. V, Hudson Iron Co., 107 Mass. 290; Brown v, This- 
sell, 6 Cush. 2$8. 

to himself^ In deed, Owen v. Field, 102 Mass. 107. 



In contract. Haldeman v. Simon ton, 55 Iowa, 144. 

BE-SHZPFING. privilege of . In bill of lading, Carr v, Str. Michigan, 27 Mo. 

196 ; Sturgess v, Str. Columbus, 23 Mo. 230 ; Broadwell v. Butler, 6 
McLean, 296; Little v. Semple, 8 Mo. 100; McGregor t/. Kilgore, 6 
Ohio, 358 ; Whitesides v. Russell, 8 W. & S. 44 ; Dunsett v. Wade, 3 
111. 28$ ; Hatchell v. The Compromise, 12 La. Ann. 783. 

In statute. Gadsbury v. Warburton, 7 M. & G. 10; Town of Salem v. 
Town of Lyme, 29 Conn. 74 ; Henry v. Ball, i Wheat, i ; Dearing 
«/. Thomas, 25 Gra. 223; Tibbits v. Townsend, 1$ Abb. Pr. 231; 
Clark V. Likens, 26 N. J. (L.) 207. 

on, use or occupy. In lease. Jackson v. Brownell, i Johns. 267 

(3 Am. Dec. 326). 

or be. In statute. Attorney-General v, McLean, i H. & C. 750. 

out of this State. In statute. Johnson v. Smith, 43 Mo. 499. 

cease to . In statute. State v. City Council, 39 N. J. (L.) 57. 

In constitution. Opinion of Judges, 5 Mete. 587; Fry's Election Case, 
71 Pa. St. 302 (10 Am. Rep. 698). 

In insurance policy. Mobile Life Ins. Co. v. Walker, $8 Ala. 290. 

In statute. Town of Waterbury v, Bethany, 18 Conn. 424; Hall v. 
Hall, 25 Wis. 608 ; Powell v. Guest, 18 C. B. (N. S.) 79. 

Way V. Way, 64 III. 406 ; Board v. Davenport, 40 HI* ^97 ; City of La 
Crosse v. Town of Melrose, 22 Wis. 462 ; Reeder v. Holcomb. 105 
Mass. 93 ; Walker v. Walker, i Mo. (App.) 404 ; re Wrigley, 8 
Wend. 134 ; Boardman v. House, 18 Wend. 512 ; Holmes v, Cary, 32 
Barb. 404; Crawford v. Wilson, 4 Barb. 504; Burrill v, Jewett, 2 
Robt. 701 ; Savage v, Scott, 45 Iowa, 130; Morgan z/. Nunes, 54 
Miss. 308. 

In constitution. Chase v. Miller, 41 Pa. St. 403. 

In insurance policy. Mobile Ins. Co. v. Walker, 58 Ala. 290. 

In statute. Hewer v. Cox, 3 El. & El. 436 ; Blackwell v. England, 8 El. 
& Bl. 545 ; Attenborough v, Thompson, 2 Hurl. & N. 559 ; Naef v. 



:iii]:^i 



/RESIDENCE. 307 J^ESISTING. 



— Continued. 

Mutter, 12 C. E (N. S.) 824 ; Gadsby v. Warburton, 7 M. & G. lO; 
Queen v, Hammond, 16 Q. B. 772 ; Ablett v. Bashaw, 5 El. & Bl. 
1020 ; Flower v Allen, 2 H. & C. 688 ; Colchester v. East Lynne, 18 
Conn. 481 , Houghton v. Ault, 16 How. Pr. 77 ; Warren v, Thomas- 
ton, 43 Me. 406 ; Langdon v, Doud, 6 Allen, 423 ; Bartlett v. New 
York, 5 Sand£ 44 ; Chaine v. Wilson, i Bosw. 673 ; Cunningham v, 
Maund, 2 Gra. 171 ; Benedict z/. Bunnell, 7 Cal. 245 ; Rex v, McHenry, 
7 Cal. 89; Wharton v. Bunting, 73 111. 16: Foot v, Harris, 2 Abb. 
Pr. 454 ; Kellogg v. Supervisors, 42 Wis. 97 ; Jenkins v. California 
Stage Co., 22 Cal. 537. 

BESIDEEIT. Reeder v, Holcomb, 105 Mass. 95. 

In statute. Queen v. University, L. R., 7 Q. B. 471 ; Roosevelt v, 
Kellogg, 20 Johns. 208 ; Frost v, Brisbin, 19 Wend. 1 1 ; Charlton Co. 
V. Moberly, 59 Mo. 238 ; Green v, Beckwith, 38 Mo. 384; Thomas v. 
Black, 22 Mo. 330 ; Burrows z/. Miller, 4 How. Pr. 349 ; Herdenbac 
V. Schaud, 10 How. Pr. 477 ; Houghton t/. Ault, 16 How. Pr. 77; 
Rex V. McHenry, 7 Cal. 89 ; Roberti v, Methodist Book Concern, i 
Daly, 3 ; Brundred v, Del Hoyo, 20 N. J. (L.) 238 ; Sears v. City of 
Boston, I Mete. 251; Hinds v. Hinds, i Iowa, 36; Fry's Case, 71 
Pa. St. 312; Crowley v, Panama R. Co., 30 Barb. 99; Peoples. 
Schoonmaker, 63 Barb. 44 ; Frost v, Brisbin, 19 Wend. 1 1 (32 Am. 
Dec. 422) ; Collinson v. Teal, 4 Sawyer, 243 ; Caldwell v. State, 2 
Tex. (App.) 53. 

aliens. In statute, Luhrs v, Eimer, 80 N. Y. 171. 

fireeholder. In statute. Damp v. Town of Dane, 29 Wis. 419. 

of this State. In statute. Palmer v. Phoenix Ins. Co., 84 N. Y.67. 

merchaaty meehanic or mannfhoturer. In statute, Speer v. 

Com., 23 Gratt. 935. 

In statute. Bell v. Pierce, 51 N. Y. 12; Charter Oak Bank v. Reed, 45 
Conn. 391. 

In statute, Rothrey v, Munnings, i B. & Ad. 18 ; New Milford v, Sher- 
man, 21 Conn. 116. 

in any parish with his relative& In statute, Reg. v. Combs, 

5 El. & Bl. 900, 

therein. In statute, Trumbull v. Moss, 28 Conn. 253. 



iisnally with. In statute. King v, Malnwaring, 10 B. & C. 69. 

BESIDXJABY. executor. Lt will. Berry v. Usher, 1 1 Ves. 87. 

legatee. In will, Laing v, Barbour, 1 19 Mass. 523 ; Barwell v. 

Mandeville, 2 How. 560 ; Hughes v, Pritchard, 6 Ch. Div. 24. 

In plea. Hills v. Men sard, 10 Q. B. 266. 

In will. Carr v. Dings, 58 Mo. 400 ; Alsop v, Russell, 38 Conn. 102 ; 
Mayor v, Att'y-Gen., 5 H. L. Cas. i ; Phelps v, Robbins, 40 Conn. 
250; Graves v, Howard, 3 Jones (Eq.), 302; Atkins z^. Krow, 2 Ired. 
(Eq.) 58 ; Seekright v, Karrington, i Wash. (Va.) 45 ; Smith v. 
Smith, 17 Gratt. 268. 

and remainder. In will, Norcum v. D'CBnch, 17 Mo. 99. 

of my estate. In will, Birdsall v, Applegate, Spencer, 244; 

Brearley v, Brearley, i Stockt. 21. 

State V. Welch. 37 Wis. 196. 

an officer. U. S. v, Lukins, 3 Wash. C. C. 335 ; Woodworth v. 

State, 26 Ohio St. 196. 



RESISTING. 



308 



RETAIL 



BBSISTIira -- Continued. 

an offloer in serving prooeM. In statute. Jones v. State, 60 



BBSOBT. 



Ala. 99. 

— to any bouae. In statute. State v. Ah Sam, 15 Nev. 27. 
to. In statute. Com. t^. Stable 7 Allen, 50$ ; Cora, v, Lambert, 



13 Allen, 177. 

in to. In statute. People v. Dowling, 84 N. Y. 487. 

BESPJBCfrABLE. In statute. Freleigh v. State, 8 Mo. 607. 

BESFBCnVE. terms. People v. Potter, 47 N. Y. 37s. 

BESPECnVELY. In statute. Belcher «^. Sikes, 8 B. & C. 209. 

In will. Doe v. Royle, 13 Q. B. 98 ; Alsop v. Russell, 38 Conn. 102. 
BESFTTB. Mishler v. Com., 62 Pa. St $5. 

BESPOITDSNTIA. Maitland v. The Atlantic* Newb. 514. 
SBSPONSIBIJK. In contract. Bickel v. Auner, 9 Phila. 499. 

bidder. In statute. People v. Dorsheimer, 5$ How. Pr. 118. 

Ibr tbe wbole note witbout notice or protest. In note. Hal- 
ley V. Jackson, 48 Md. 254. 

lowest bidder. In statute. Com. v. Mitchell, 82 Pa. St 343 ; 

Findley v. Pittsburgh, 82 Pa. St. 351 ; People v. Dorsheimer, S$ 
How. Pr. 118. 

of my land. In will. Springett v. Jennings, L. R., 6 Ch. 

App. 333- 
residue and remainder. In statute. Hoyt v. Hoyt, 85 N. Y. 



BESTBAIN. 



BBSTBAINT. 
BESTBAINTS. 



150. 
all tbe . In will. Altree v. Altree, L. R., 11 Eq. Cas. 28a 

all tbe of my estate. In will, Dobson v. Bowness, L. R. 5 

Eq. Cas. 405. 

In statute. State v. Northampton Co^ 4S Conn. 344 ; Esson v. Tarbeli, 
9Cush. 415. 

In statute. Queen v, R Ca, 2 Q. B. 47. 

In city ordinance. City of Emporia v. Valmar, 12 Kas. 622. 

and suppress. In statute. City of Burlington v, Lawtenca. 4^ 

Iowa, 681 . 

suppress and • In statute. Smith v. City of Madis6n, 7 Ind. 86. 

Edmonson v. Harris, 2 Tenn. Ch. 427. 

and detentions of piinoes. In insurance poUcy, Richardsoa 

V, Marine Ins. Co., 6 Mass. 102 (4 Am. Dec. 102). 
— — of princes. In insurance policy, Schmidt v. Union Ins. Co., 1 
> Johns. 249 (3 Am. Dec. 319). 

of prinoes and rulers. In contract. Ford v. Coatesworth, 10 



BSSULT. 
RESULTING. 



B. & S. 991 ; Finlay v, Liverpool Steam Co., 23 L. T. (N. S.) 251. 

and detainments of king, prinoes or people. In stat- 
ute, Vigers v. Ocean Ins. Co., 12 La. 362 (32 Am. Dec. 118). 

the . In statute. Balmforth v. Pledge, 7 R & S. 43»- 

trust. Guphill v, Isbell, i Bailey (Law), 230 (19 Am. Dec 675). 



In statute. State v, Cassety. i Rich. 90; State v. Mooty, 3 Hill (S. C), 
187 ; Gossuth V, Butterfield, 2 Wis. 237 ; Harris v, Livingston, 28 
Ala. 577 ; Moore v. State, 16 Ala. 41 1 ; Com. v, Kimball, 7 Mete 304. 

dealer. In statute, Lillenstein v. State, 46 Ala. 498 ; Luling v. 

Labrache, 35 La. Ann. 972. 



RETAIL, 



309 



RE VENUE. 



— Continued. 

liquor bills. 1h statute, Gossuth v, Butterfield, 2 Wis. 242. 

liqueur dealer. In statute. U. S. v, Jackson, i Hughes, 531 ; 

U. S. V, Mickle, i Cranch C. C . 268. 

Glaholm v. Rountree, 6 Ad. & El. 717. 

In plea. Elderton v. Emmons, 6 C. R 175. 

aud employ. In pleading. Emmons v. Elderton, 4 H, L. Cas. 

624. 



BETAINBD. 
BETAINER. 



RIBV JfiJM U JiL 



In plea. Elsee v. Gatward, 5 Term Rep. 143. 

Taylor v. Deblois, 4 Mason, 131 ; Miller v. Irby, 63 Ala. 483. 

our bUL In contract. Elsom v. Denny, 15 C. B. 88 ; 25 Eng. L. 

& Eq. 423. 

In constitution. Livingston v. Hannibal, etc., R. Co., 60 Mo. 
516; Soukong V. Wolf, 35 Mo. 174; ex parte Bethurum, 66 Mo. 545. 

law. In constitution. Bradford v. Brooks, 2 Aikens, 284 (16 Am. 



Dec. 715) ; Bleakney v. Farmers', etc., Bank, 17 S. & R 64 (17 Am. 
Dec. 635); Merrill v. Sherburne, i N. H. 199 (8 Am.^ec. 52) ; King 
V. Dedham Bank, 15 Mass. 447 (8 Am. Dec. 112) ; Jones v. Jones, 2 
Overt. 2 (5 Am. Dec. 645) ; Dow v. Norris, 4 N. H. 16 ; Simpson v. 
Savings Bank, 56 N. H. 466; Townsend t^. Townsend, Peck, i (14 
Am. Dec. 722); Bell v, Perkins, Peck, 261 (14 Am. Dec. 745); 
Woart V, Winnick, 3 N. H. 473 (14 Am, Dec. 473) ; Society v. 
Wheeler, 2 Gall. 105 ; State v. Squires, 26 Iowa, 340 ; Clarke v. Mc- 
Creary, 20 Miss. 347. 

does not wish to . In deed. Stuart v. Dutton, 39 111. 91. 

In constitution. Harpending v. Haight, 39 Cal. 199. 

i>f statute. Taggert v. Indiana, 15 Mo. 210; King v. Lane, 7 Mo. 243, 
(37 Am. Dec. 187) ; Ingraham v. Reed, 33 Miss. 20 ; Hyman v. Bayne, 
83 111. 256 ; Luce v. Mayhew, 13 Gray, 85. 

In mil. McMurtrie v. McMurtrie, 3 Green, 276 ; Den v. Crawford, 3 
Halst. 90. 

of the writ. In statute. Hunter v. Simpson, 3 E & C. no. 

to 'his duty. In statute. The Cadmus v, Matthews, 2 Paine, 

229. 

In plea. Hunter v. Caldwell, 10 Q. R 69. 

flrom beyond* the seas. In statute. Lafond v. Ruddock, 13 C. 

a 815. 

In statute. Jackson v. Jackson, 28 Miss. 680. 

to his work. In statute. Lakeman v. Stephenson, 9 R & S. 57. 

Re Began, 12 R. I. 309. 

In constitution. Fletcher v. Oliver, 25 Ark. 289. 

In statute. Babcock v. Goodrich, 47 Cal. 488. 

laws. In statute. Warner v. Fowler, 4 Blatchf. 311 ; The Abi- 
gail, 3 Mason, 331 ; The Nashville, 4 Biss. 188 ; Pe3rton v. Bliss, i 
Woolw. 170. 

laws of a state. In statute. Davenport v. Dowes, 1 5 Wall. 390. 

laws of the United States. In statute. U. S. v. Norton, i Otto, 

567; Stevens 7/. Mack, 5 Blatchf. 514; Parsons v. Hunter, 2 Sum- 
ner, 425; U. S. V, Wright 3 Pittsb. 192. 

Welch V. Hotchkiss, 39 Conn. 142. 



REVENUE. 



3x0 



RIGHT. 



In statute, Webster v. People, 96 



BKVJfiMUJC — Continued 

all OM60 relating to the 

^ in. 343. 

BJSVISBSED. judgment ^ In opinion of court, Laithe v, McDonald, 7 

Kas. 254. 

BEVXB8ION. Vaughan v. Stuzaker, 16 Ind. 388; Todd t/. Jackson, 26 N. J. (L.) 525. 

In statute. Ward v. Cost, 10 B. & C. 649. 

In wilL Stackbouse v, Barnston, 10 Ves. 453. 

In statute, Bailey v. Johnson, L. R., 6 Ex. 279. 

— ^ to* In will, Jiggetts v, Devis, i Leigh, 405. 

In statute, Visant v, Knox, 27 Ark. 272. 

In statute. Cox v, Stevens, 14 Me. 205. 

In statute, Lindsey v, Lyman, 37 Iowa, 206. 

8on» In will. Pond v, Bergh, 10 Paige, 140. 



BSVIBED. 
BBVIVSD. 
&UV1VING, 



BXVOLT. 



BEVOCATIOir. Gains v. Gains, 2 A. K. Marsh. 190 (12 Am. Dec. 375). 

In plea. Frets v. Frets, i Cow. 335 ; Allen v, Watson, 16 Johns. 205. 

In statute. The Mentor, 4 Mason, 105 ; U. S. v. Savage, 5 Mason, 461. 
U. S. V, Gardner, 5 Mason, 403 ; U. S. v. Barker, 5 Mason, 404 ; U. S. 
V, Sharp, Pet C. C. 1 18 ; U. S. v, Kelly, 4 Wash. C. C. 528 ; 1 1 Wheat, 
417; U. S. V, Nye, 2 Curt 225 ; U. S. v. Peterson, i Woodb. &. M. 
305 ; U. S. V, Smith, i Mason, 147. 

In statute, Chapon v, Smythe, 11 Blatchf. 120; Lane v, Russell, 4 
Cliff. 122. 

In statute, Williams v, Barney, 5 Blatchf. 220. 

fhir, average, nioranBi • In contract. Simond v. Braddon, 2 C 

R (N. S.) 325. 



BIBBOirS. 



BICB. 



BIDGUNG. 
BIDING. 



BIGHT. 



Brisco V. State, 4 Tex. (App.) 221. 

Queen v, Ely, 1 5 Q . B. 828. 

or division. In statute. Queen v, Pearce. 5 Q. B. Div. 387. 

the girls. In slander, Walton v. Singleton, 7 S. & R. 451 0<> 

Am. Dec. 482). 

Thompson v, Waterloo, L. R., 6 Eq. Cas. 40 ; Stanley 7/. Earl. 5 Lit- 
tell, 281 (15 Am. Dec. 66 )j Atchison, etc., R Co. v, Baty,6 Neb. 37. 

In statute, Ashworth v, Heyworth, 10 B & S. 314; Imperial Soap 
Co. V. Cooper, 8 C. B. (N. S.) 814. 

aoquired. In constitution, Tully v, Traun, 53 CaL 274. 

and claim. Richardson 7/. Cambridge, 2 Allen, 121. 

and title. Hozie v, Finney, 16 Gray, 382. 

debt or duty. In statute, Fairbanks v. Benjamin, 50 Vt. 99, 

heirs. In will. Comfort 7/. Brown, 10 Ch. Div. 146 ; Hawes v. 

Hawes, 14 Ch. Div. 614; Vernon v, Wright, 7 H. L. Cas. 35 ; Gor- 
dan V, Small, 53 Md. 550. 

hereby secured. In statute. Coleman v. Allen, 5 Mo. (App.) 135. 

of property. In statute. Bacon v. Com., 7 Gratt 602 ; Nash r. 

Nash, 12 Allen, 348. 

of trial by jury. In constitution. State v, McClear, 3 Cent. L. 



J 240 ; State v, Worden, 46 Conn. 364 ; Cairo, etc., R. Co. zf. Trout, 
32 Ark. 18. 

— of way. Williams v. Western Union R. Co., 50 Wis. 71 ; Challis 



RIGHT. 3" RIOTOUS, 

BIGHT — Continued 

V. Atchison, etc.» P. Co., 3 Cent. L. J. 271 ; Chicago, etc., R. Co. v. 
Paddock, 75 111. 616 ; Green v. Morris, etc., R. Co., 24 N. J. (L.) 486. 

of way as located. In statute, Akers v. New Jersey, etc., R 

Co., 43 N. J. (L.) no. 

option and refUaal to prtrohase. In contract, Bostwick v. 
Hess, 80 111. 138. 

— over land. In statute. Clark v. School Bd., L. R., 9 Ch. 
(App.) 120. 

— I>ower or privilege. In statute. Fearon v. Mitchell, L. R., 7 
Q. B. 690. 

— privilege or immunity. In statute. Banks v. Mayor, 7 
Wall. 16. 

— title and interest. In deed. Lertensdorfer v. Hempstead, 18 
Mo. 269 ; Lewis v. Chapman, 59 Mo. 371 ; Watson v. Priest, 9 Mo. 
(App.) 263. 

— title and interest in and to the lots of land. In statute. 
Dunlap V. Stetson, 4 Mason, 364. 

— title, olaimy interest and demand! In deed. Faner v. Patton, 
20 Mo. 81. 

— title or interest. In statute. Christman v. Charleville, 36 
Mo. 610. 

— to be heard by oonnseL In constitution. State v. Hoyt, 47 
Conn. $18. 

— to be heard by himself and his oonnseL In constitution. 
State V. Paige, 21 Mo. 257. 

— to bear arms. In constitution. Bliss v. Com., 2 Litt. 90 (13 
Am. Dec. 251). 

— to keep and bear arms. In constitution. Wilson v. State, 33 
Ark. 557. 

— to redeem. White v. Whitney, 3 Mete. 81. 



all and title. In statute. Hartman v. Schultz, loi 111. 437. 

as of . In statute. Bright v. Walker, i CM. k R. 211 ; Mon- 
mouthshire Canal Co. v. Harford, i C. M. & R. 614; Tickle v. 
Brown, 4 A. & E. 369 ; Kinloch v. Nevile, 6 M. & W. 795 ; Clay v. 
Thackrah, 9 C. & P. 47 ; Eaton v. Swansea Co., 17 Q. B. 267 ; Mason 
V. R. Co., L. R., 6 Q. B. 578. 

in his own . In statute. Gill v. Gas Co., L. R.. 7 Ex. 336. 

In statute. Graham v. Robinson, L. R., 2 Q. B. 390 ; St. Joe F. & M. 
Ins. Co. V. Hauck, 63 Mo. 118. 

already aoonied. In statute. Link v. Benner, 3 Gaines, 325 ; 

Brotherton v. Brotherton, 41 Iowa, 112. 

natural, essential and inherent . In constitution. Aldrich v. 

Wright, 53 N. H. 398. 

Com. V. Rumells, 10 Mass. 518 (6 Am. Dec. 149); U. S. v. McFarland, 
I Cranch C. C. 140; Ripart v. State, 42 Ind. 273 ; State v. Cole, 2 
McCord, 117; State v. Brooks, i Hill (S. C), 361 ; State v. Dil- 
lard. 5 Blackf. 365 (35 Am. Dec. 128). 

Williams v. State, 9 Mo. 270. 

BIOTOXJ8. and tumnltuons manner. In statute. State v. Kutter, 59 

Ind. 572. 



EIOTS. 



3x2 



ROBBERY. 



BIOTB. 

RTPARTAN. 

BISK 



BIVEB8. 
BOAD. 



BOADS. 

BOADSTEAD. 
BOB. 

BOBBEBS. 
BOBBEBY. 



or oommotioM. In insurauce policy, lonides v. Uniy. Ins. 

Co., 14 C. B. (N. S.) 29$. 

proprietor. Bardwell v, Ames, 22 Pick. 355 ; Com. v, Rozbary, 

9 Gray, 521, note. 

In insurance policy, Bradford v, Symondson, 30 W. R. 27. 

In statute. Bayard v, Ins. Co., 4 Mason, 265. 

of ooUiflion. In statute. The D. S. Gregory, 2 Ben. 226. 

of DETigation. In agreement. Pitcher v, Hennessy, 48 N. 

Y. 415. 

of the master and owners. In contract. Wells v. Steam Nav. 

Co., 8 N. Y. 375. 

owner's . In contract, French v, Buffalo, etc., R. Co., 4 Kcycs, 

108 (2 Abb. App. Dec. 196} ; Alexander v. Green, 7 Hill, 533; Moore 
V, Evans, 14 Barb. 524 ; Wells v. Steam Nav. Co., 8 N. Y. 375 ; Wal- 
lace V, Sanders, 42 Ga. 486 ; Nashville, etc., R. Co. v, Jackson, 6 
Heisk. 271 ; D'Arc v, London, etc., R. Co., L. R., 9 C. P. 325 ; Lewis 
V, Great Western R. Co., 26 W. R. 14. 

passengers • In contract, Stewart v, London, etc., R Co., % H. 

& C. 135 ; Cohen v. South Eastern R. Co., 2 Ex. Div. 253. 

In statute, Bartlett v, Chouteau Ins. Co., 18 Kas. 369. 

In statute. State v, Gilmanton, 14 N. H. 467 ; Schermerhom v. Hod> 
son River R. R., 38 N. Y. 103 ; Queen v. Grey, 7 B. & S 443. 

feeder. In contract, Phelps v. Sheldon, 13 Pick. 5a 

great , In statute, Rolle v, Whyte, 8 E & S. 143. 

The J. W. Eyerman, 2 Hughes, 17. 

In deed, Munn v, Worrall, 53 N. Y. 44; Morgan v. Palmer, 48 N. H. 
337. 

In statute. Tanner v, R. Co., 5 El. & Bl. 618 ; Loveridge v. Hodsoll, a 
B. ft Ad. 618 ; Follmer v, Commrs., 9 Neb. 204 ; Jaquith v. Richard- 
son, 8 Mete. 216; Com. v, Sammons, 23 Pick. 201 ; Chollar Potosi 
Mining Co. v, Kennedy, 3 Nev. 361 ; Green v, Morris, etc, R. Co^ 
24 N. J. (L.) 486 ; Bussey v. Storey, 4 B. & Ad. 1 10. 

as oonstmoted. In statute, Akers v. New Jersey, etc., R. Co^ 

43 N. J. (L.) 1 10. 

Grossing. In statute. Brooks t^.^New York, etc., R. Co., 13 Barb. 

594 ; Brace v. New York, etc., R. Co., 27 N, Y. 269. 

with its appendages. In statute. State Treasurer v. Somer- 



ville, etc., R. Co., 28 N. J. (L.) 21. 

traveled publio or street. In statute, Bauer v, Kansas P^ific 

R. Co., 69 Mo. 219; Hodges v, St. Louis R« Co., 70 Ma 50. 

wagon or oart . In statute. Bidder v, R. Co., 4 Q. B. Di?. 41^ 

In statute, Tracy v, T. & B. R. R.. 38 N. Y. 433. 

and streets* In indictment. Homer z/. State, 49 Md. 278. 

The J. W. Eyerman, 2 Hughes, 17; U. S. v. Morel, 13 Am. Jur. 279. 

U. S. V, Wilson, Baldw. 78. 

In slander, Tomlinson v, Brittlebank, 4 B. & Ad. 632. 

In bill of lading, De Rothschild v. Royal Mail, etc., Co., 7 Ex. 734* 

Brown v. State, 28 Ark. 126 ; State v, Gorham, 55 N. H. 152 ; U. S.». 
Jones, 3 Wash. C. C. 209; State v, Sowls, Phill. (L.) 151 ; McDaoid 
V, State, 16 Miss. 401 ; Clary v. State, 33 Ark. 562 ; Seymour v. State, 



ROBBERY. 



313 



RUNNING. 



BOCOA. 

Boaun 

BOIiIJNG. 
BOOM. 



BOOTS. 



— Continued. 

15 Ind. 288; Slegar v. State, 39 Ga. 583; Crews t/. State, 3 Coldw. 
350; People V, McGinty, 24 Hun, 62 ; State v. Howeaton, 58 Mo. 581 ; 
State V, Broderick, $9 Mo. 318 ; James v. State, 53 Ala. 380; People 
V, Hall 6 Park. C. C. 642. 

JBf statute, U. S. v. Palmer, 3 Wheat. 610 ; U. S. v. Jones. 3 Wash. C. 
C. 209 ; U. S. V, Baker, 5 31atchf. 6 ; U. S. v, Durkee, i McAllister, 
201 ; Wilson v. State, 3 Tex. (App.) 64. 

Schneider v, Laurence, 3 Blatchf. 1 1 5. 

and vagabond. In statute, • Bailie's Case, i Leach, 696 ; Rex v» 

McCIusky, I Jebb, 163; Monck v, Hilton, 2 Ex. Div. 268. 

mill. Pyle v. Pennock, 2 W. & S. 390 (37 Am. Dec. 517). 

In insurance policy, Daniels v, Hudson River Ins. Co., 12 Gush. 416. 

Lt statute. State v, Gregory, 47 Conn. 277 ; People v, St. Clair, 38 Cal. 

In will. Ogle v, Tayloe, 49 Md. 170. 

ball . In statute, Owens v. State, 3 Tex. (App.) 406. 

In insurance policy, Coit v. Com. Ins. Co., 7 Johns. 385 (5 Am. Dec. 
365) ; Baker v, Ludlow, 2 Johns. Cas. 289. 

mamifhotnrer. In insurance policy. Wall v, Howard Ins. Co.» 

14 Barb. 383. 

In deed, Davis v. Handy, 37 N. H. 65. 

In deed, Jackson v. Reeves, 3 Gaines, 298. 

or location. In statute, Attorney-General v, R. Co., 36 Wis. 466. 

along its , In statute. Grand Trunk R. R. v, Richardson, i Otto, 

4S4- 
upon its . In statute, Safford v, Boston, etc., R Co., 103 Mass. 

584. 
and bounds. In statute. People v, Comm'rs of Highways, 37 

N. Y. 360. 

all . In deed. Parmell v. Mill, 3 C. B. 637. 

In statute. Reg. v. Wood, 5 El. & Bl. 55. 
In statute. Shaw v, Neall, 6 H. L. Cas. 581. 

of taxation shall be unifbiUL In constitution. Van Slyke v. 

State, 23 Wis. 655. 
and regulations. In statute, Hamilton v. Dillon, 21 Wall. 73 ; 



BOUND. 
BOTTTE. 



BOYA17CIES. 



U. S. V, Schackleford, 18 How. 588. 
of decision. In statute, Boyce v, Tabb, 18 Wall. 547 ; Vance v. 



Campbell, \ Black, 427; Haussknecht v, Claypool, i Black, 431; 
Lefiingwell v, Warren, 2 Black, 599 ; Dibble v, Furness, 4 Blatchf. 
263. 

of the oonrt in the progress of the triaL Cooper v, Omohun- 

dro, 19 Wall, 65. 

fldse . In statute. Com. v. Smith (Oyer and Terminer. Phila.), i 

Whart. Dig. 826. 

to market. In note, Lamon v. French, 25 Wis. 41. 

— - upon the land of any other person. In statute, Ayer v. 



RUJIJIJLNG. 



Starkey, 30 Conn. 304; Grannis v, Cummings, 25 Conn. 165. 

— aoooont. Pickett v. Bank, 32 Ark. 346 ; McNeil v, Nash, 27 Ark. 

343. 



40 



R UNNING. 



3x4 



^LE, 



Bmnmra — Continued. 

— aooounts. In statute. Brackenridge v, Baltzell, i Ind. 33} 

and bounding. In deed, Hammond v. Ridgely, 5 H. & J. (Md) 

345 (9 Am. Dec. 522) . 

at large. In city ordinance, Spect v, Arnold, 52 Cal. 455. 

In statute, Hammond v, Chicago, etc., R. Co., 43 Iowa, 168 ; Thompson 
V, Corpstein, 52 Cal. 653; Wright v, Clark, 6 Reporter (Vt),409; 
Welsh V, Chicago, etc., R. Co., $3 Iowa, 632 ; Goener v, Woll, 26 
Minn. 154. 

away and leaTing her dhildren. In statute, Cambridge 

Union v. Parr, 10 C. B. (N. S.) 102. 

days. In charter-party, Pringle v, Mollett, 6 M. & W. 80; Ben- 
son V, Blunt, I Q. B. 868 ; Crowell v, Barreda, 16 Gray, 471. 

while on the Hudaon river. In insurance foUcy, SL Nicholas, 



SABBAm. 



etc., Ins. Co. v. Merchants, etc., Ins. Co., 18 N. Y. (S. C.) 108. 
State V, Drake, 64 N. C. 589. 

night. In statute, Kroer v. People, 78 111. 294. 

flA-R-nA»inHr--nTtTeATrTTQrfl.. Jn statute. State v. Popp, 45 Md. 432. 

custody. In statute. Queen v, Newman, 8 Q. B. Div. 706. 

port. lu charter-party, Ogden v, Graham, i B. & S. 774; The 

Alhambra, 5 Prob. Div. 256. 

rate of speed. Cleveland, etc., R. Co. v, Newell, 75 Ind. 542. 

and seonrely. In plea, Ross v. Hill, 2 C. B. 877. 



SAID. 



SAIL. 



SAIiABx* 



Simpson v, Lewthwaite, 3 B. & Ad. 231 ; Wilkinson v. State, 10 Ind. 
372 ; Ellis V, Horine, i A. K. Marsh. 417. 

In plea, Jones v, Clarke, 3 Q. B. 194; Chapman v, Beckington, 3Q. 
B. 703. 

In will. Hall v, Warren, 9 H. L. Cas. 420. 

appeal. In order. Queen v. Eyre, 7 El. & Bl. 619. 

ooiinty. In deed. King v. Inhabitants. 2 R & Ad. 491. 

mortgage deed, the real estate thereby conveyed. Menitt 

V. Harris, 102 Mass. 327. 

parties. Lord v, Taylor, 14 Pick. 165. 



In insurance policy. Lang v. Anderson, 3 R & C. 502 ; Pettigrew v. 
Pragle, 3 B. & Ad. 520; Graham v. Barras, 5 B. A Ad. 1019; 
Bowen v. Hope Ins. Co., 20 Pick. 275. 

her himself. In contract. Sheriffs v. Pugh, 22 Wis. 273. 

Cowden v. Huff", 10 Ind. 83. 

In constitution, Dane v. Smith, 54 Ala. 47. 

In statute. Castle v, Lawlor, 47 Conn. 343. 

Williamson v. Perry, 8 How. 544; Newcomb v. Cabell, 10 Bush, 4^; 
Huthmacker v, Harris, 38 Pa. St. 460; Doughty z^. Hope, i N. Y. 
79; Robinson v. Hirschfelder, 59 Ala. 503 ; Leigh v. Mobile R. Co.* 
58 Ala. 165; Valentine v. Piper, 22 Pick. 92; Howard v. Harris, 8 
Allen, 299; Buffum v. Merry, 3 Mason, 481 ; Gardner v. Lane, 1 3 
Allen, 39 ; Schermerhorn v. Tallman, 14 N. Y. 93; Ratilly v. Wlson, 
3 Dill. 420 ; Stanton v. Henderson, i Ind. 69. 

In constitution. Smith v. Mariner, 5 Wis. 582. 

In contract. Rice v. Mayo, 107 Mass. 550; Moor v. Roberts, 3C.B. 
(X. S.) 830. 



SALE. 3x5 SALT. 

fiALB — Continued. 

In insurance policy. Wolf v. Security Fire Ins. Co., 39 N. Y. 49. 

In statute. Madison Avenue Baptist Church v. Baptist Church, 46 N. 
Y. 131 ; Gunter v. Lecky, 30 Ala. 591 ; Howard v, Harris, 8 Allen, 
297; Walbrunz/. Babbitt, 16 Wall. 577; Henniker t/. Henniker, i El. 
& BI. 59 ; Sapp V, Broom Co., 20 Kans. 243 ; Com. v. Smith, 102 
Mass. 144; Martin v. State, 59 Ala. 36. 

by auction. In statute. Jones v, Nanney, i McClelland, 3; ; 

Rex V. Taylor, i McClelland, 362 ; Crandall v. State, 28 Ohio St. 479. 

bgr priyate oontraot. Barlow v. Osborne, 6 H. L. Cas. 556. 

mortgage or other disposition of real eetate. In will. Atty.- 

Gen. V, Wynham, i H. & C. 575. 

—^ of land. In statute. Evans z/. Green, 23 Miss. 294; Denn v. 
Diamond, 4 B. & C. 245. 

or disposition. In statute. Taylor z/. Keymer, 3 B. & Ad. 320. 

or transfer. In statute. Padbury v. Garlick, 36 Conn. 384. .« 



alienated by or otherwise. In insurance policy. Jackson v. 

Massachusetts, etc., Ins. Co., 23 Pick. 418 (34 Am. Dec. 69). 

oontraot for the of goods, wares and merchandise. In statute. 

Simon v, Metivier, x W. Bl. 599; Hinde v. Whitehouse, 7 East, 558; 
Roudeau v. Wyatt, 2 H. BL 63; Alexander t^. Comber, i H. Bl. 20; 
Towers v. Osborne, i Strange, 506; Clayton v. Andrews, 4 Burr, 
2101 ; Cooper z/. Elston, 7 T. R. 14; Aliens. Bennet, 3 Taunt. 169; 
Williams v. Burgess, 10 A. & E. 499 ; Grarbutt v. Watson, 5 B. & Aid. 
613 ; Mixer z/. Howarth, 21 Pick. 207; Lamb v. Craft, 12 Mete. 356; 
Gardner z/. Joy, 9 Met. 179 ; Cason v, Cheely, 6Ga. 554; Cobbald v. 
Caston, 8 Moore, 460 ; Acker v, Campbell, 23 Wend. 372 ; Bennett v. 
Hull, 10 Johns. 364; Newman v, Morris, 4 Harr. & McH. 421 ; Ide v. 
Stanton, 15 Vt. 690; Sawyer v. Ware, 36 Ala. 675; Woodward v. 
Patterson, 32 Barb. 630; Gleason v. Drew. 9 Greenl. 79; Alexander 
V, Ghiselin, 5 Gill. 180; Phelps v. Hendrick, 10$ Mass. 106; Buck- 
ner v, Reis, 34 Mo. 357 ; Brown v. Slauson, 23 Wis. 244 ; Davis v. 
Robertson, i Mill, 71 (12 Am. Dec. 611). 

sheriff's . Batchelder v. Carter, 2 Vt. 168. 

BAlMkBLR. nnderwoods. In statute. Fitzhardinge v. Pritchett, L. R., 2 Q. 

B. 136. 

— by oommeroial brokers. In statute. Collectors. Doswell, 16 
Wall. 156. 

-9 transfers and oonveyanoes. In statute, Corbett v. Nutt, 10 



Wall. 464. 

8AIASMAK. Emmerton v. Mathews, 7 Hurl. & N. $90 ; Hagan v. Domestic Sewing 

Machine Co., 9 Hun, 73. 

SAXOON. In indictment. State v. Mansker, 36 Tex. 364 ; Brockway v. State, 36 

Ark. 636. 

In statute. Kitson v. Mayor, 26 Mich. 325 ; State v, Barr, 39 Conn. 41- 

SAIdOOlTKEEPEB. Cahill v. Campbell, 105 Mass. 40. 

SAIiT. In insurance policy. Journu v, Bourdieu, Park on Ins. 245. 

liok. In statute. State v. Miller, 3 McLean, 151 . 

spring. In statute. State v. Miller, 3 McLean, 151. 

water. Niles v. Patch, 13 Gray, 257. 



SAL us. 



316 



SATISFACTORY. 



SALUS. 



SAIiVAaS. 



aAI.VOB. 



populi est suprema lex. Mayor v. Lord, 17 Wend. 385 ; Ameri- 
can Print Works v. Laurence, 23 N. J. (L.) 590; Donahoe v. Rich- 
ards, 38 Me. 379. 

The H. B. Foster, Abb. Adm. 222 ; Weeks v. The Catherine Maria. 2 
Pet. Adm. 424; Lea v. The Alexander, 2 Paine, 466 ; Spencer v. The 
Charles Avery, i Bond, 117 ; The Clarita and Clara, 23 Wall i;The 
M. B. Stetson, i Lowell, 121. 

The Ida L. Howard, i Lowell, 23 ; The Wave v, Hyer, 2 Paine, 131 ; 
The Charles, i Newb. Adm. 329. 

allotments. In statute. Ellis v. Amison, 5 B. & Aid. 53. 

cause. In statute, Mesper v. Brown, i C. P. Div. 99. 

demand. In statute. Marble v. Hinds, 67 Me. 204. 

ground. In contract, Mumford v, Gething, 7 C. R (N. S.) 305* 

oAnae. In constitution, U. S. v, Cahill, i Hughes, 522. 

place. Westfall v, Farwell, 13 Wis. 509. 

property. In deed. Parks v, Watson, 29 Mo. 108 ; Brockway v. 

Rowley, 66 111. 99. 

regulations. In statute, Patton v, Hanna, 46 Mo. 316. 

stooik. In contract, Allan v. Lake, 18 Q. B. 562. 

voyage. In ckarter-party, Gether v. Capper, 18 C. R 868. 

gaming table of the or like kind* /jk statute. Com. v, 

Wjratt, 6 Rand. 694. 

made at the time. In statute. Wood v. Norton, 9 R ft C.887. 

on the voyage. In statute. Wright v. Norwich R. Co, 8 

Blatchf. 22. 

table or bank of the or like kind. In statute. State v. Red, 

7 Rich. 8. 

the . In contract. Hayward v, Parke, 16 C. R 325. 

In will, Hancock v, Hancock, 14 Pick. 7a 

In statute. Re Kimball, 2 Ben. 42. 

only equal to . In contract. Nichols v, Godt, 10 Ex. 191. 

8Ain>-PACKlJN G. In indictment. Daniel t/. State, 61 Ala. 5. 

fiAllB. or insane. In insurance policy, Bigelow v, Berkshire Ins. Ca» 

3 Otto, 284 ; Adkins v, Columbia Life Ins. Co., 70 Mo. 27. 

BATIBFAOnOir. In contract, Eagleton v. East India Co. , 3 Bos. ^ P. 55 ; Moore 

V, Fleming, 34 Ala. 491. 

entire . In contract. Sloan v. Hayden, no Mass. 141. 

proved to the of the selectmen. In statuU. Town of WiltoD 

V, Town of Weston, 48 Conn. 333. 

BATIBFAarOBY. aflldayit. In statute. Whiley v, Whiley, 4 C. R (N. S) 660. 

oause. Smith v. Bean, 130 Mass. 298. 

notes. In contract, Hanna v. Mills, 21 Wend. 90 (34 Am. Dec 

216). 

proofl In statute. Van Steenbeiigh v. Kortz, 10 Johns. 167. 

to the selectmen. In contract. Backsportz^ Brewer, 67 Me. 

295. 

if the machine is or does what is claimed Ito it. Incomtrad. 

Clark V. Rice, 46 Mich. 308. 
proof • In insurance policy , Braunstein v, Ins. Co., i R ft S 7^ 



I 



sa tisfied. 



317 



SEA. 



SAr 



i:i[^ji:hi 



SAW-MILI.. 
SAY. 



SCANDAL. 



SCHISM. 

SCHNAPPS. 
SCHOOL. 



In indorsement of mortgage. Sims v, Campbell, i McCord Ch. 53 (16 
Am. Dec. 595)1 

fully . Stote V, Sears, Phill. (L.) 146. 

well . In contract, Fdlliard v, Wallace, a Johns. 395. 

Caigs V. Chiller, 2 Prob. Div. 151. 

In deed. Farrart/. Stackpole, 6 Me. 154 (19 Am. Dec. 201). 

about 1,100 tons. In contract, Morris v, Levison, i C. P. Div. 

155. 

not less than 100. In contract, Leeming v, Snaith, 16 Q. B. 

275. 

that is to . In plea, Bradley z/. Pilot, 2 El. & Bl. 42^. 

Skinner v, Judson, 8 Conn. 528(21 Am. Dec. 691). 

In statute, Stratt v, Robinson, 3 B. & Ad. 395. 

In contract. Nelson v, Benson, 69 III. 27. 

In statute, McKinney v, Griggs, 5 Bush, 401. 

soheidam • Burke v, Cassin, 45 CaL 467. 

In statute. State v, Gager, 28 Conn. 232. 

hoiue. In statute, Chegaray v. Mayor of N. Y., 13 N. Y. 220 ; 

Chegaray v, Jenkins, 5 N. Y. 377. 

distriotB. In constitution. People v, McAdaras, 82 111. 356. 

Aind of the oonnty. In statute. Hanlon v, Coram'rs of Lloyd 



County, 53 Ind. 123. 

high . Attorney-General v, Butler, 123 Mass. 304. 

flpee • In deed. Le Couteulx v. City of Buffalo, 33 N. Y. 333. 

SCHOOLING. In will Birchard v. Scott, 39 Conn. 69. 

SCHOOLS. oommon • In statute. Le Couteulx v. City of Buffalo, 33 N. Y. 

333- 
public . In statute, Jenkins v, Andover, 103 Mass. 99. 

town . In statute, Cushingz/. Inhabitants of Newburyport, 10 

Mete. 512. 

SOIKNTIFIC. parpoees exoliisively. In statute, St. Marylebone v. Zoologi- 
cal Soc., 3 El. & Bl. 807 ; Purchas v. Holy Sepulchre, 4 El. & Bl. 
170. 

SdKE FACIAS. Bentley v, Sevier, i Hemp. 249 ; Chestnut v. Chestnut, 77 111. 346 ; 

Walker v. Wells, 17 Ga. 547 ; Stearns v, Barrett, i Mason, 153. 

oommon • Rex v, Foxby, 6 Mod. 14 ; Com. v, Hutchinson, 5 

Clark (Pa.), 321 ; James v. Com., 12 S. & R. 220; Com. v, Mohun, 
52 Pa. St. 243 ; U. S. V, Royall, 3 Cranch C. C. 618 ; State v, 
Schlottmann, 52 Mo. 164 ; Com. v, Davis, 1 1 Pick. 432 ; Com. v. 
Pray, 13 Pick. 359; Com. v, Foley, 99 Mass. 497. 

by way of seckl. In statute, Grimsley v, Riley, 5 Mo. 280(32 



SCRSrWED. 



Am. Dec. 319). 

In statute, Lewis v, Overby, 28 Gratt. 627. 

In slander. Mills v. Van Horn, 17 Ind. 245. 

Waring «^. Clarke, 5 How. 441 ; Doane v. Wilcutt, 5 Gray, 336 ; Niles 
V, Patch, 13 Gray, 257. 

In deed, Scratton v. Brown, 4 B. & C. 503. 

In statute. Baker z/. Hoag, 7 N. Y. 555 ; Hubbard v, Hubbard, 8 N. 
Y. 196. 



SEA, 



3X8 



SEAWORTHY. 



— Continued. 



8SAL 



SEAIiED. 



— letter. Sleght v. Rhinelander, i Johns. 192 ; Sleght v. Harts- 
home, 2 Johns.' 531. 

shore. Church v: Meeker, 34 Conn. 421 ; Cutis v. Hussey. 15 



Me. 237 ; Storer v. Freeman, 6 Mass. 435 ; Doane v. Wilcutt, s ^^J» 
336. 

stores. In statute, U. S. v. Twenty-three coils of cordage, 

Gilp. 303 ; U. S. V. Twenty-four coils of cordage, Baldw, 502. 

at . In insurance policy, Bowen v, Hope Ins. Co., 20 Pick. 275 

(32 Am. Dec. 214). 

In statute. The Harriet, i Story, 251. 

main . People v. Supervisors, 73 N. Y. 393. 

prooeed to . In statute. The City of Cambridge, L. R, 4 Adm. 

& Ecc. 161. 

Warren v. Lynch, 5 Johns. 239; Giles v. Maudlin, 7 Rich. (S. C.) n ; 
Carter v, Burley, 9 N. H. 558 ; Douglass v, Oldham, 6 N. H. 150; 
Pearsall v, Dwight, 2 Mass. S4; Com. v, Griffith, 2 Pick. 11 ; Coit 
V. Millikin, i Denio, 376 ; Allen v, Sullivan, etc., R. Co., 32 N. H. 
446 ; Trasher v, Everhart, 3 Gill k J. 234 ; Jones v. Longwood. i 
Wash. (Va.) 42 ; Force v. Craig, 2 Halst. (N. J.) 172 ; Alexanders. 
Jameson, 5 Binn. 238 ; Ralph v. Gist, 4 McCord (S. C), 267; Van- 
blarcum v, Yeo, 2 Blackf. 322 ; Harden v. Webster, 29 Ga. 427; 
Pease I/. Lawson, 33 Mo. 35; Underwood z/. Dallas, 47 Mo. 259; 
Pillow V, Roberts, 13 How. 472 ; Maples v. Park, 17 Conn. 340; 
Bradley v. Northern Bk., 60 Ala. 253 ; Overseers v. Overseers, 6 
N. J. (L.) 169; Perrine v, Cheeseman, 12 N. J. (L.) 174; Corrigan 
v. Trenton, etc.. Falls Co., 5 N. J. (Eq.) 52; Curtis 2/. Leavitt, 17 
Barb. 309 ; Rose v. Bedell, 5 Duer, 462 ; Pillow v. Roberts, 13 How. 
472 ; Hempst. 624 ; Follett v. Rose, 3 McLean, 332 ; Farmers' Bk. 
V, Haight, 3 Hill, 493 ; Bates v, Boston, etc., R. Co., 10 Allen, 251; 
U. S,v, Stephenson, i McLean, 462. 

In deed, Glasscock v, Glasscock, 8 Mo. 577. 

In statute. Perrine v, Cheeseman, 6 Halst. 174 (19 Am. Dec. 388); 
Geary v. Kansas, 61 Mo. 378 ; Eaton v. North, 20 Wis. 449. 

oorporate . In statute. Woodman v. York, etc., R. Co., 50 Me. 

549. 

offioial of suoh notary. In statute. Goodyear v, Hullhen. 2 

Hughes, 497. 

tinder his proper hand and . 



Hurley v, Ramsay, 49 Mo. 309. 



In deed. Davis v, Judd, 6 Wis. 86. 

In note. Mitchell v. Davis, Harp. (S. C.) i. 

Instnunent. Blackwell v. Hamilton, 47 Ala. 470. 

up. In statute, Morgan v, Jones, 44 Conn. 225. 

SEAMAN. In statute, U. S. v. Savage, 5 Mason, 461 ; U. S. v, Thompson, i Sttin- 

ner, 169; U. S. v, McArdle, 2 Sawyer, 367; The North America, 5 
Ben. 486. 

SEABCH. ' In statute. Kenyon v. Hart, 6 B. & S. 253. 

SEAWOBTHY. In insurance policy, Phillips v. Naime, 4 C. B. 343 ; Small v. Gibson, 

16 Q. R 128 ; Lord v. Goodall, etc.. Steam Co., 4 Sawy. 292 ; Bulges 
V, Wickham, 3 B. & S. 669 ; Hollingworth v. Brodrick, 7 Ad. k EIL 
46; Draper z/. Commercial Ins. Co., 4 Duer, 234; Dupontde Nemoun 
V. Vance, 19 How. 162 ; Copeland v. New England Ins. Co., 2 Mete 



SEA WORTHY. 



319 



SECURITY. 



SEAWOBTHY — Continued. 

432 ; Hathaway v. Sun Mut. Ins. Co., 8 Bosw. 33 ; Prescott v. Union 
Ins. Co., I Wliart. 399 (30 Am. Dec. 207) ; Capenz/. Washington Ins. 
Co., 12 Cush. 517. 

In patent, Keyser v, Coe, 9 Blatchf. 32. 

In contract, Myers v. Walker, 24 111. 133. 

mortgage bondfl* In statute. Douglas v. Town of Chatham, 



SEASON. 



SEOOHD. 



sscmoN. 

SBCUTiAB. 



SECUBED. 



41 Conn. 210. 

— safe port. In charter-party, Atkins v. Fibre Disintegrating 
Co., 2 Ben. 381. 

disposition of the dead body. In statute. Queen v. Brown, 



L. R., I C. C. R. 244- 

partnership. U. S. Bank v, Binney, 5 Mason, 177; DeeringT/. 

Flanders, 49 N. H. 225. 

In note. Bottomley v. Fisher, i H. & C. 296. 

In statute. People v. Manufacturing Co., 99 111. 361. 

for the time being. In note. Storm v. Sterling, 3 El. & Bl. 833. 

In slander, Kelly v, Partington, 5 B. & Ad. 650. 

on or about their person. In statute, Sutton v. State, 12 Fla. 

135. 

'- or denomination of Christians. In constitution, Laurence v, 

Fletcher, 8 Mete. 162. 

religions , order or denomination. In constitution, Boyce v. 

Christian, 69 Mo. 494. 

another or different persuasion, or denomination. In consti- 
tution. Muzzy V, Wilkins, Smith's Decisions, i. 

In statute. Spring v. City of Olney, 78 111. xoi ; Ellis v, Whitlock, 10 
Mo. 781. 

business. In statute, Gladwin v, Lewis, 6 Conn. 49 (16 Am. 

Dec. i). 

In statute, Finn v, Donohue, 35 Conn. 216. 

oalling. In statute. Smith v. Foster, 41 N. H. 221. 

In constitution, Wheaton v. Peters, 8 Pet. 660. 

In contract, Raikes v, Todd, 8 Ad. & El. 846 ; Foot v. Webb, 59 Barb, 

38. 
In statute. Pennellz/. Rhodes, 9 Q. B. 128. 

impound or otherwise . In statute, Thomas v, Harris, i Man. 

& G. 703. 

or invested in her name. In statute, Jennings v, Davis, 31 



Conn. 134. 
to be paid. In statute, U. S. v. Three hundred and fifty chests 



of Tea, 12 Wheat. 487 ; Six hundred and fifty-one chests of Tea v, 
U. S., I Paine, 518. 

Hanoed. In statute, Pitts., C. & St L. R. R. v. Eby, 55 Ind. 567. 

In constitution, Wheaton v, Peters, 8 Pet. 591. 

for money. In will, Hopkins v. Abbott, L. R., 19 Eq. Cas. 222 ; 

Galliers v. Moss, 9 B. & C. 280. 

Storm V, Waddell, 2 Sandf. Ch. 494. 

In contract. Brown v. White, 3 Blackf. 431. 

Jn note, Fulton v, Matthews, 15 Johns. 433 (8 Am. Dec. 261). 



SECURITY. 



320 



SEIZED, 



SBOUB3TY -^ Continued. 

In statute. Lowe v, Blakemore* L. R., 10 Q. R 485 ; Armstrong v, 

Cowles, 44 Conn. 44; Clark v. Barrett, 19 Mo. 39. 
for his debt. In statute. Holmes v. Tutton, s El. & BI. 78. 

for the paymont of money. In statute, Stoessinger v. R Co^ 

3 El. & BL 5$a 

oollateral . Shoemaker v, Nat Mechanics Bank, 2 Abb. (U. S.) 

416. 

oreditor haTing for his debt. In statute, Marray v, Arnold 

3 B. & S. 288 ; Hopkins v, Clarke, 4 & & S. 836 ; 5 B. & S. 753* 
person bound as for another. In statute, Ross v, Jones^ 22 

Wall . 577. 
such shall be compelled, is statute, Vaughn v, Haden, 37 

Mo. 178. 

deliberate mind. Primus v. State, 2 Tex. (App.) 369. 

flat. Church v. Meeker, 34 Conn. 421. 

In informatum. State v. Bierce, 27 Conn. 319. 

In statute. State v, Bierce, 27 Conn. 319. 

and debauoh. In statute. People v, Millspaugh, 11 Mich. 27^ 

Com. V, DoruSy 108 Mass. 488. 

Hagan v, Cregan, 6 Robt (N. Y.) 138; Clark v. Fitch, 2 Wend. 459; 
Bell V, Barker, 29 Ind. 267 ; Broughton v. Smart, 59 IlL 440 ; Del- 
veet'. Boardman, 20 Iowa, 446; Leucker v, Sterlew, 89 111. S4St 
Crogan v. State, 22 Wis. 44$ ; People v, Millspaugh, 1 1 Mich. 27^, 
People V, Clark, 33 Mich. 118. 

into port any ships. In insurance policy, Jarrett v. Ward, i 

Camp. 270. 

you out. Brewster v. Countryman, 12 Wend. 446. 

you paid. Watkins v, Perkins, i Ld. Ray. 224; Jones t^. Cooper, 



BEDGB. 
BBDITOn 



SBDUCED. 
BSDUOnON. 



Cowp. 227. 

— barley. In contract. Carter v. Crick, 4 Hurl. & N. 412. 



I ;>i :« 1 1 



ra. 



BEI8IN. 



SEIZS. 



S] 



A VA :\ • 



Dans V, Benn, i R & C. 767. 

garden . In statute, Boving v, Lawrence, i Blatchf. 616. 

a livelihood within the city. In statute. Smith if, Hnrrell. 

10 B. & C. 543. 

/// statute. Cook v, Hammond, 4 Mason, 488. 

of a freehold estate. Windham v, Portland, 4 Mass. 384. ^ 

Fitzhugh V. Crogan, 2 J. J. Marsh. 430; McMillan v. Hutchison, 4 
Bush, 613; Hart v. Dean, 2 McArthur, 60; Ford v. Gamer, 49 
Ala. 601. 

Pel ham v. Rose, 9 Wall. 103. 

In statute, Reg. v, Longhorn, 17 Q. R 80. 

Burton v. Smith, 13 Pet. 464. 

In statute, Englishbe v, Helmuth, 3 N. Y. 294. 

In will. Leach v. Jay, 6 Ch. Div. 496 ; 9 Ch. Div. 43. 

of an estate or inheritanoe. In statute, Kirby v« Vantreeoe, 

26 Ark. 368. 

die . In will. Leach v. Jay, 27 W. R. 99. 

In statute. McNutt v. Turner, 16 Wall. 352. 



SEIZIN. 



321 



SENIOR. 



;^:^^'.il 



SEIiBCfCION. 



fl IB ■ ■■■ 



;^:^ .%i%^.% 



:i:-i -III 



»LOir. 



Rose V, Rose, 5 Heisk. 533. 

The Silver Spring, i Sprague, 551 ; The Josefa Segunda, 10 Wheat 
312; Greene v. Pacific Ins. Co., 9 Allen, 219. 

In insurance policy, Pipon v. Cape, i Camp. 434; Appleton v, Crown- 
inshield, 3 Mass. 443 ; Green v. Pacific, etc.. Ins. Co., 9 Allen, 217 ; 
Barney v, Maryland Ins. Co., 5 H. & J. 139. 

fbr illioit trade. In insurance policy Church v. Hubbart. 2 

Cranch, 187 ; Carrington v. Merchants' Ins. Co., 8 Pet. 495. 

ooet of . In statute. Fifteen Empty Barrels, i Ben. 125. 

In statute. Perry v. State, 9 Wis. 20. 

by the owner. In constitution. Norris v. Kidd, 28 Ark. 490. 

to be • In statute. Re Henkel, 2 Sawyer, 309. 

In statute. Clark v. Bond, 4 Bazt. 288. 

Levells v. State, 32 Ark. 585 ; Blake v. State, 3 Tex. (App.) 531 ; 
Plummerz^. State, 4Tex. (App.) 310; May ?/. State, 6 Tex. (App.) 191. 

Butts V. Newton, 29 Wis. 632 ; Lumpkin v. Wilson, 5 Heisk. 555. 

In contract. Smith v. Haynes, 9 Me. 128 ; Bryson v. Rayner, 25 Md. 

424. 
In power of attorney. Vanada v. Hopkins, i J. J. Marsh. 285 (19 

Am. Dec. 92) ; Durham v. Oddie, i Mart. (N. S.) 444 (14 Am. Dec. 

190). 

In statute. De Ru3rter v. St. Peter's Church, 3 N. Y. 238 ; Brown v. 
Van Duzee, 44 Vt. 529; Margo v. Goodman, 2 Miss. 552 ; People v. 
Cox, 45 Cal. 342 ; Macy v. Raymond, 9 Pick. 285 ; Savage v. Walshe 
26 Ala. 619; Sawin v. Guild, i Gall. 485. 

and oonvey. In statute. Coope v. Curtis, 30 Me. 488. 

and dispose o£ In statute. Gordon v. Preston, i Watts, 385 (26 

Am. Dec. 75). 

and exchange. In power. Phelps v. Harris, 1 1 Otto, 370. 

any offloe. In statute. Sailing v. McKinney, i Leigh, 42 (19 

Am. Dec. 722). 

as unadulterated. In statute. Fitzpatrick v. Kelly, L. R., 8 Q. 

B. 337. 

dispose of; oontraot and bargain for. In power of attorney. 

Clarke's Lessee v. Courtney, 5 Peters. 319. 

exchange and deliver. In indictment. State v. Watson, 65 

Mo. 115. 

my fbrm for me. In instructions to agent. Stewart v. Wood, 



63 Mo. 252. 

— or give away liquors. In statute. Young v. State, 58 Ala. 359. 

— the same at public sale. In power. Bast v. Bank, 1 1 Otto, 95. 



Lambert v. People, 76 N. Y. 220. 

of learning. In statute. Chegaray v. Mayor of N. Y., 13 N. Y. 

220 ; Chegaray v. Jenkins, 5 N. Y. 377. 

public . In will. Curting v. Curting, 8 Dana, 38 (33 Am. Dec. 

475). 
any letter. In statute. Rex v. Wagstaff, i Russ. A Ry. 399. 



In statute. Queen v. Inhabitants, 18 Q. B. 390. 

in servioe. Opinion of the Justices, 126 Mass. 603. 

41 



SENT. 



SERVANT. 



SJiNTJUIOB. 



SEBIOUB. 



by post. In statute. Bishop v. Helps, 2 C. R 56. 

oauaed the goodi to be . In statute, Hearne v, Garton, 

2 EI. & EL 75. 

In statute. State v. Salomons, 5 Yerg. 360 (27 Am. Dec. 469) ; Com. 
V, Lockwood, 109 Mass. 335. 

a of impriflonment in the penitentiaiy. In statute, Presbury 

V, Hall, 34 Mo. 30. 

In will. Massy v. Brown, L. R., 4 H. L. 288. 

and distinot dwelling-honaee. In statute. Ring v. Inhabit- 
ants, 5 Ad. & Ell. 265 ; Same v. Same, 9 Q. R 230 ; Queen v. 
Elswick, 3 El. & El. 440. 

buainesa. In statute. Lowell v, Newton, 4 C. P. Div. 7. 

estate. In statut$* Smith v. Smith, 30 Ala. 642 ; Glenn v, Glena, 

41 Ala. S7I ; re Lowe, 11 Bankr. Reg. 221. 

potts. In statute. Parker v. U. S., i Peters, 293. 

— property. Alston v. Rowles, 13 Fla. 117. 

and in oonseoatiye order. In statute. Gage v. Barley, 102 

111. 12. 

^ofToyages. In charter-party. Poland t^. Maryland Coal Co., 
14 Blatchf. 519. 

— bodily hann. In statute. Lawler v. People, 74 111. 228. 

iUnesSy looal disease, afllMStlon or personal injury. In in^ 
surance policy. Southern Life Ins. Co. v, Wilkinson, 53 Ala. 556. 

— ^ personal ixijory. In insurance policy. Ins. Co. v, Wilkinson, 
13 Wall. 222. 

Towsonz/. Havre De Grace Bk., 6 H. & J. 47 (14. Am. Dec. 254) ; 
Heygood v. State, 59 Ala. 51 ; Queen v, Lynn, 8 Ad. & Ell. 379 ; 
King V. Inhabitants, 4 Ad. & Ell. 494 ; Clark v. Fitch, 2 Wend. 459 
(20 Am. Dec. 639). 

In indictment. Gravatt v. State. 25 Ohio St. 162. 

Ik statute. Com. v, Foster, 107 Mass. 221 ; Rex v, Spencer, Rass. ft 
Ky* 299; Rex V. Smith, Russ. & Ry. 516; Rex v. Carr, Russ. & Ry. 
193 ; Rex V, Hoggins. Russ. & Ry. 14s ; Rex v. Tongue, Bell C. C. 
289 ; Reg. V. Hughes, i Moody C. C. 370; Reg. v. Negus, L, R.. 2 C. 
C. R. 34; Reg. V, Mayle, 11 Cox C. C. 150; Reg. v, Tyree, L, R., i 
C. C. R. 177; Reg. V. Freeman, 5 C. & P. 534; People v. Dalton, 15 
Wend. 581; Williams v, Stoll, i Cr. & M. 675; Reg. t'. Dixon, 11 
Cox C. C. 178 ; Reg. v, Thomas, 6 Cox C. C. 403 ; Reg. v, Foulkes. 
13 Cox C. C. 63 ; Reg. v, Williams, 7 C. & P. 338 ; Reg. v, Winnall. 5 
Cox C. C. 326; Reg. V, McDonald, L. & C. 85; Reg. v. Turner, n 
Cox C. C. 552 ; Reg. v. Tite. L. & C. 29 ; Reg. v. Gale. L. R., 2 Q. R 
Div. 141 ; Reg. v. Guilder. Bell C. C. 284 ; Reg. v. Carpenter, L. R., i 
C. C. R. 29 ; Rex v, Tyers, Russ. & Ry. 402 ; Reg. v, Beacall, i Mood. 
C. C. 16; Reg. V, Gibson, 8 Cox C. C. 436 ; Reg. v, Adey, 1 Den. C. 
C. 571 ; Reg. V, Truman, 2 Cox C. C. 306 ; Reg. v. Murphy, 4 Cox C. 
C. loi ; Gravatt v. State. 25 Ohio St. 162 ; Reg. v, Atkinson, 2 Moody. 
278; Rext^. Hartley, Russ. & Ry. 139; Rexz/. Squire, 2 Starkie, 349; 
Reg. V, Atkinson, Car. & M. 525 ; Rex v, Beacall, i Oar. & P. 
310; Rex V, Prince. 2 Car. & P. 517 ; Rex v. Snowley, 4 Car. & P. 390; 
Rex V. Pearson, 4 Car. & P. 572 ; Rex v, Salisbury, 5 Car. & P. 155 ; 
Reg. V, Townsend, Car. & M. 178; Reg. v. Hunt, 8 Car. & P. 642; 
Reg. V, White, 8 Car. <& P. 742 ; Reg. v, Wilson, 9 Car. & P. 27; Reg. 



SSBVAITT. 



SERVANT. 323 SERVANT. 

S^BVAITT — Continued 

V. Welch, 2 Car. & R. 296; Reg. v. Townsend, 2 Car. & R. 168; Rex 
V. Rees, 6 Car. 8t P. 606 ; Reg. 2/. Masters, i Den. C. C. 332 ; 2 Car. & 
K. 930; Temp. & M. i ; 18 L. J. (N. S.), M. 0. 2 ; Reg. v. Miller, 2 
Moody, 249 ; Rex v, Mellish, Russ. & Ry. 80 ; Rex v. Burton, i 
Moody, 237 ; Budd v. State, 3 Humph. 483 ; Com. v. Wyman, 8 Mete. 
247 ; Reg. V, Watts, i Eng. L. & Eq. 558 ; 2 Den. JD. C. 14; State v. 
Chandler, 2 Stol. 266; Reg. v, Jones, Car. & M. 611 ; Reg.z/. Masters, 
3 New. Ses. Cas. 326 ; 12 Jur. 942 ; Reg. v, Sheppard, 9 Car. & P. 121 ; 
Walker v. Com., 8 Leigh, 743; Rex v. Jackson, i Moody, 119; Com. 
V, Steams, 2 Mete. 343 ; Reg. v. Lovell, 2 Moody & R. 236 ; Kine v, 
Evershed, 10 Q. B. 143; Com. z^. Libbey, 11 Mete. 64; People v. 
Sherman, 10 Wend. 298 (25 Am. Dec. 363); People t^. Dalton, 15 
Wend. 521 ; Lewis v, Kendall, 6 How. Pr. 62 ; Coote v, Colton, 5 La. 

IS- 

in husbandry. In statute. Davies v. Lord Berwick, 3 El. & El. 

554. 
or employee. In statute. Wells v. South Minnesota R. Co., i 



Fed. Rep. 270* i McCrary, 18. 

or servants. In statute. Duke of Somerset v. Inhabitants, 4 B. 

& C. 171. 

any or olerk. In statute. Rex v. Smith, i Russ. & Ry. 267 ; 

Rex V. Spencer, i Russ. & Ry. 299 ; Rex v. Squire, i Russ. & Ry. 

350. 
domestio . In statute, Wakefield v. State, 41 Tex. 558. 

Ibllow . Waller v. South-eastern R. Co., 2 H. & C. 102 ; Hutchin- 
son V, York, etc., 5 Ex. 343 ; Bartonshill Coal Co. v. Reed, 3 Macq. 
295 ; Wymore v. Judy, 5 Ex. 354 ; Feltham v, England, L. R., 2 Q. B. 
33 ; Tumley z/. Midland R Co., i C. P. 291 ; Gallagher v. Piper, 16 C. 
B. (N. S.) 669 ; Moigan v. Vale of Neath R. Co., L. R., i Q. B. 149; 
McAndrews v. Bums, 39 N. J. (L.) 119; Foster v, Minnesota, etc., 
R. Co., 14 Minn. 360 ; Wonder v, Baltimore, etc., R. Co., 32 Md. 41 1 ; 
Ryan v, Chicago, etc., R. Co., 60 III. 171 ; Marshall v, Schnicker, 63 
Mo. 308 ; Daubert v, Pickel, 4 Mo. (App.) 590 ; Cumberland Coal 
and Iron Co. v. Scally, 27 Md. 489; O'Connellt/. Baltimore, etc., R. Co., 
20 Md. 212 ; McGowan v. St. Louis, etc., R. Co., 61 Mo. 528 ; Shanck 
V. Northern, etc., R. Co., 25 Md. 462 ; Columbus, etc., R. Co. v, Ar- 
nold, 31 Ind. 174; Thayer v, St. Louis, etc., R. Co., 22 Ind. 26; 
O'Connor v. Roberts, 120 Mass. 227 ; Summersell v. Fish, 117 Mass. 
312; Zeigler v. Day, 123 Mass. 152; Albro v, Agawam Canal Co., 6 
Cush. 75; McLean v. Blue Point Mining Co., 51 Cal. 255; Faulkner 
V, Erie R. Co., ^ Barb. 324 ; Malone v, Hathaway, 64 N. Y. 5 ; 
Brown v. Maxwell, 6 Hill, 592 ; Sherman v, Rochester, etc., R. Co., 17 
N. Y. 1 53 ; 15 Barb. 574 ; Hofnaglei^. New York, etc., R. Co., 55 N. Y. 
608; Shansey z/. Androscoggin Mills, 66 Me. 420: Baird v, Pettit, 70 
Pa. St. 477 ; Louisville, etc., R. Co. v, Robinson, 4 Bush, 507 ; Pitts- 
burgh, etc., R. Co. V. Dervinney, 17 Ohio St. 197 ; Seaver v, Boston, 
etc., R. Co., 14 Gray, 466 ; Moran v. New York, etc., R. Co., 3 N. Y. 
(S. C.) 770; Manville v. Cleveland, etc., R. Co., 11 Ohio St. 417 ; St. 
Louis, etc., R. Co. v. Britz, 72 111. 256 ; Hayes v. Western R. Co., 3 
Cush. 270 ; Dow V. Kansas Pacific R. Co., 8 Kans. 642 ; Chicago, etc., 
R. Co. V. Murphy, 55 111. 336; Voltz v, Ohio, etc., R. Co., 85 111. 500; 
Illinois, etc., R. Co. v. Cox, 21 111. 20; Rjran v. Cumberland Valley 
R. Co., 23 Pa. St. 384 ; Chicago,, etc., R. Co. v, Keefe, 47 111. 108 ; 



SERVANT, 



324 



SETTLE. 



SXBVAirr — Continued. 

Rag^dale v. Memphis, etc., R. Co., 59 Tenn. 426 ; Wegert/. Pennsyl- 
vania R. Co., 55 Pa. St. 460; Coon v. Syracuse, etc., R. Co., 5 N. Y. 
492; Sherman v. Rochester, etc., R. Co., 17 N. Y. 153 ; Whalen v. 
Mad River, etc., R. Co., 8 Ohio St. 249 ; Baldt v. New York, etc, R. 
Co., 18 N. Y. 432; Booth V, Boston, etc., R. Co., 73 N. Y. 38; Flikc 
V. Boston, etc., R. Co., 53 N. Y. 550; Smith v. New York, etc R- 
Co., 19 N. Y. 132 ; Svenson v. Pacific Mail Steam. Co., 57 N. Y. 108; 
I Jones & Sp. 277; Johnson v, Boston, xi8 Mass. 114; Slater v. 
Jewett, 85 N. Y. 61 ; Peterson v, Whitebreast Co., 50 Iowa, 673. 

In statute. Doolan v. R. Co., 2 App. Gas. 792 ; Boni&ce v. Scott. 3 S. 
A R. 355. 

all my . In wilL Fozall v, McKenney, 3 Cranch C. C. 206. 

laboren» and apprantioaa. In statute. Coffin v, Reynolds, 37 



SXBVAim. 



8XBVIGB. 



SXBVrnJDE 



8B8SION. 



SBT-OFF. 



SETTING. 



N. Y. 640. 

a private table. In contract. Porter v. Merrill, 124 Mass. 534. 

every day they may as audh. In statute. State v. Thompson, 

37 Mo. 176. 

In writ, Marshall v. Loring, 6 S. & R. 281. 

and ezeouted. In statute, Wray v. Earl, 4 B. & Ad 125. 

In statute. Directors v, Gidlow, L. R, 7 H. L. 517 ; ex parte Paria» 3 
Woodb. & M. 227 ; Howes v, Middleboro, 108 Mass. 123. 

of the ship. Ringold v, Crocker, Abb. Adm. 344. 

of the Bummona. In statute, Bogart v, Sweezey, 26 Han. 463. 

having had personal . In sheriff* s return. State v, St Louis, i 

Mo. (App.) 507. 

in my . In will, Darlow v, Edwards, i H. & C. 550. 

when in actual in tabne of war. In constitution. Re Bogeit, 2 

Sawy. 407. 

Manly v. Field, 7 C. B. (N. S.) 96. 

In statute Leeds v, Bowen, 2 Abb. Pr. (N. S.) 43 ; Russell v. Miner, 61 
Barb. 534; Russell v. Miner, 25 Hun, 114. 

personal or earnings. In statute, Hoyt v. White. 46 N. H. 4$. 

labor. In statute. Gladwin v, Lewis, 6 Conn. 49 (16 Am. Dec r). 

Taylor v, Hampton, 4 McGord, 96 (24 Am. Dec. 710). 

involuntary . In constitution. Slaughter House Gases, 16 WalL 

36. 
Queen v, Belton, 1 1 Q. R 379. 

in , In constitution. People v, Fancher, 50 N. Y. 288. 

aside. In statute. State v, Primm, 61 Mo. 166. 

lire to. In indictment, Howel v. Com., 5 Gratt 664. 

gEL Sutton V, Cole, 8 Mass. 96. 

on fbot. Charge to Grand Jury, 5 McLean, 306. 

cameos not . In statute, Bailey v, Schell, 5 Blatchf. 1 95. 

Avery v. Brown. 31 Conn. 398. 

In statute, Pellas v, Ins. Co.. 5 C. P. Div. 3$. 

up a claim thereto. In statute, Mozon v, Ayers, 28 Wis. 614. 

Baxter v. State, 9 Wis. 40; Brody v. Dougherty, 30 Miss. 4a 

In contract, Moore v, Hyman, 13 Ired. (Eq.) 272 ; Pickerton v, Bailey, 
8 Wend. 600; Stilwell v, Coope, 4 Denio, 225 ; Fort v, Gooding. 9 
Barb. 371. 



SETTLE. 



325 



SHALL. 



SETTLE— Continued. 

In deed, Grier v. Grier, L. R., S H. L. 683. 

In statute* Queen v. Inhabitants, 7 Q. B. 534 ; re Dent, 8 Q. B. 60. 

Micklethwait v. Same, 4 C. B. (N. S.) 858. 

In indictment. Rex v. Hart, i Moody, 486. 

In receipt. Rex z/. Martin, 7 C. & P. 549; Dorsey v. Kollook, i N. J. 

(L.) 35. 
limits of the United States. In insurance policy. Gassier v. 

Conn. Mut. Life Ins. Co., 22 N. Y. 427. 

mixuBter. Kibbe v. Antram, 4 Conn. 134. 

In statute, Fitzpatrick v, Dubois, 2 Sawyer, 437 ; City of La 



SETTUNG. 
SEVENTH. 

SEVEBAL. 



Crosse v. Town of Melrose, 22 Wis. 462 ; Cummington v, Wareham, 
9 Cush. 588. 

aotnal . In statute, Balfour v, Meade, i Wash. 25. 

in of the aooonnt. In receipt, McMurray v, Taylor, 30 Mo. 263. 

Rector v, U. S., 3 Cent. L. J. 612. 

actual . In statute, Stroud v, Missouri, etc., R. Co., 4 Dill. 396. 

Clark V. U.S.. 6 Wall.' 546. 

or youngest ohild. In will. West v. Lord Primate, 3 Brown 

Ch. 148; 2 Cox Ch. 149. 

Halfordz/. Bailey, 8 Q. B. 1000 ; 13 Q. B. 427; Einstein v. Marshall, 

58 Ala. 1 53 (29 Am. Rep. 729). 

deaths. In will, Colton v. Fox, 67 N. Y. 348. 

hundred dollars' worth. In guaranty, Einstein v, Marshall, 

58 Ala. 1 53 (29 Am. Rep. 729). 

juriadiotionB. In statute. Queen v. Justices, 7 B. & S. 395. 



SBVERALIiY. In statute, Mcintosh v. Ensign, 28 N. Y. 169 ; Pruyn v. Black, 21 N. 

Y. 300. 

and*suooes8ively. In will, Parker v, Tootal, 11 H. L. Cas. 143. 

sickness or disease. In statute, Holloman v. Life Ins. Co., 



8EVSB3B. 



8BWEB. 



SKXUAL. 

OTTATiTi. 

^Z?£rectory,) 



I Woods, 675. 

In statute. Queen v, Bd. of Health, 5 B. & S. 886 ; 5 B. & S. 936 ; 
Poplar Bd. v. Knight, i El. B. & El. 428 ; Reg. v, Godmanchester, 
L. R., I Q. B. 328. 

oommon . In city charter. Bennett v. New Bedford, no 

Mass. 433. 

on account of . In constitution. Re Maquire, 57 Cal. 604. 

intercourse. In statute. Noble v. State, 22 Ohio St. 543. 

People V. San Luis, 3 Cent. L. J. 192 ; Railroad Co. v, Hecht, 5 Otto, 168 ; 
Morris Canal v. Van Voorst, i Zabr. 100; Ludlow z/. Ludlow, i South. 
387 ; Serfle v, Elizabeth. 3 Dutch. 407 ; Sovy v. State, 9 Vroom, 
324; Paulisont/. Taylor, 6 Vroom, 184; Morrell v, Buckley, Spen- 
cer, 667; Morrell v. Fearing, Spencer, 670; Edwards v. Hall. 30 
Ark. 31 ; Neal v. Burrows, 34 Ark. 491 ; Queen v. Inhabitants, 12 
Q. B. 150; State «/. Merton, 14 Mo. 74; McGee-z/. Porter, 14 Mo. 612; 
West V, Ross, 53 Mo. 350; Warner v. Hart, 6 Wis. 465 ; Cason v, 
Oason, 31 Miss. 578; Queen v, Fletcher, L. R., i C. C. R. 320; 
Wheeler z/. Chicago, 24 III. 105 ; Beal v. Finch, 1 1 N. Y. 128 ; Borkheim 
V. Ins. Co., 38 Cal. 505 ; City of Little Rock v, Willis, 27 Ark. 573 ; 
Jones «/. Varney, 8 Cush. 137; Cameron v, Cameron, 15 Wis. 8 ; 
Dosseth V, Harding, i C. B. (N. S.) 530 ; Porvis v, Harding, id. 533 ; 



SHALL. 



326 



SHAREHOLDERS. 



{Mandatary.) 



SHABX. 



beappraiaed. 
be completed. 



mTATiTi — Continued. 

Donovan's Appeal, 40 Conn. 154; Jackson v. Young, 5 Cow. 269 
(1 5 Am. Dec. 473); State v. Stumpf, 21 Wis. 580; Railroad Co. v, 
Hecht, 5 Otto. 170 ; County Commrs. v. Meekins, 50 Md. 42 ; Whit- 
tington, ex parte, 34 Ark. 394; Tobin v. People, loi 111. 133. 

Re Petition of Douglass, 46 N. Y. 42 ; Krebs v. Dodf^, 9 Wis. 10 ; 
Cooke V. Spears, 2 Cal. 412; State v. Merrimanp 6 Wis. 14; State v. 
Dousman, 28 Wis. 541 ; State t/. Hilmantel, 21 Wis. 567; Weavers. 
Lapsley, 43 Ala. 224; The Belfast v. Boon, 41 Ala. 50; State v. 
Mead, 71 Mo. 266; ex parte Jordan, 94 U. S. 248; Montague v. 
Smith, 17 Q. R 690; Phelps v, Fadden, 125 Mass. 200; U. S. 
V, Hodson, 10 Wall. 395; French v. Edwards, 13 Wall $06; 
People V. Board of Assessors, 39 N. Y. 81 ; The China, 7 Wall. 53 ; 
Buck V, Dangenbecker, 8 Vroom, 359 ; Howard v. Blackford, Penn. 
777; Davison v. Davison, 2 Harr. 169; Profis v. Jones, 7 Vroom, 
206; Smith V, Noe, 30 Ind. 117; Brooks v. Cock, 3 Ad.&El. 141 ; 
State V, Johnson, 26 Ark. 281 ; Morris v. People, 3 Denio, 381 ; 
Butler V. Craig, 27 Miss. 628. 

and will release. In deed, Thomas v, Courtnay, i B. ft Aid. 8. 

be. In statute. Doe v. Page, S Q- ^3- 7^7' 

Eaton V. Stone, 7 Mass. 315. 

In statute. York, etc., R. Co. v. Queen, i EL 
& Bl. 862. 

beoome. Com. v, Dracut, 8 Gray, 457. 

be given. In statute. Rutherford v. Greene, 2 Wheat. 196. 

have. In statute. Jackson v. Chapman, 3 Cow. 390. 

have delivered. In statute. Brooks v. Bockett, 9 Q. B. 85$. 

have levied. In statute. Whedon v. Gorham* 38 Conn. 411 ; 

Norris v. Sullivan, 47 Conn. 475. 

not. Parker v. U. S., 2 Wash. C. C. *36i. 

answer. People v. McCumber, 18 N. Y. 315 ; Keifer v. Thomas, 

6 Abb. Pr. (N. S.) 42. 

or oonflgnration. In statute. Rogers v. Driver, 16 Q. R io> 

In statute. McMurphy v. Coolbaugh, 49 111. 1 10. 

In will. Taylor v. Taylor, 23 Conn. 584 ; Parsons v. Ljrman, 4 BridC 
268 ; Nottebeck v. Astor, 13 N. Y. 98 ; Genet v. Beekman, 27 Baib. 
371 ; Wood V. Denny, i Biss. 75. 

and share alike. In mil. Orpe v. Frost, i B. & C. 646 ; Prov- 

enchere's Estate, i Leg. Gaz. Rep. 68; Gilpin v. Hollingsworth. 
3 Md. 190. 

in the distribution of assets. In statute. Re Bigelow, 2 Ben. 

487. 
SHABBHOLDSB. Barley t/. Provident Life Association, i C. B. (N. S.) 5S7 ; Wolver- 

ton Water Works v. Hawkesford. 6 C. B. (N. S.) 337 ; Williams v. 
Anglo-California Co., 18 Q. R 728; Stewart v. Anglo-Califomia 
Co., 18 Q. B. 737 ; Revere v. Boston, 123 Mass. 375 ; Davis v. 
Stevensp 17 Blatchf. 260 ; Deposit Ins. Co. v. Ayscough, 6 El. k HI. 
763 ; Burke v. Lechmerer, 6 Q. B. 297 ; Portal v. Emmens. i C. P. 
Div. 201 ; Burke v. Lechmerer, L. R., 6 Q. B. 297. 

8HABBHOLDEBS. In statute. Farmer v. Giles, 5 Hurl. & N. 760 ; Laing v. Barley. 

loi 111. 591. 
any . In statute. Nixon v. Brownlow, 3 Hurl. & N. 687. 



SHARES. 



327 



SHIPS. 



SHABINa. 



SHAVB. 
SHAVING. 



i:iHi 



:«:■ ^ h: 



:<:i:^:-i:tf;l:«i 



fffTAHBfl« People v, Comm'rs of Taxes, 35 N. Y. 423. 

In contract. Tempest v. Kilner, 3 C. B. 249. 

In indictment. Rex v. Mott, 2 C. & P. 521. 

In statute* VaifSyke v. State, 23 Wis. 655 ; Harrison v. Vines»46 
Tex. 15. 

in a railway. In will. Morrice v. Aylmer, L. R., 7 H. L. 717. 

of profits. Kilshaw v. Jukes, 3 B. & S. 861. 

land . Sensenderfer v. Neale, 66 Mo. 669. 

dangerous weapon. In statute. People v. Cavanagh, 62 How. 

Pr. 188. 

In libel. Stone v. Cooper, 2 Denio, 293. 

In libel. Stone v. Cooper, 2 Denio, 293. 

In indictment. Reg. v. Amos, 2 Denison C. C. 65 ; 5 Cox C. C. 222; 
Reg. V. Cooley, 2 M. & R. 475. 

In indictment. McCulIy's case, 2 Lewin C. C. 272 ; Reg. v. Barnin, 
I Jebb, 245 ; Rex v. Loom, i Moody, 160. 

In statute. Wright v. Pearson, 10 B. & S. 726. 

In statute. DeForest v. Lawrence, 13 How. 274. 

Skinner v. White, 9 N. H. 204* 

In statute. Worsley v. R. Co., 16 Q. B. 540; Hume v. Korris, 5 
Oregon, 478 ; DeWit v. Decker, 9 N. J. (L.) 148. 

of St Louis ooTtnty. In note. Powell v. Morrison, 58 Mo. 244. 

is interested. In statute. Hardwick v. Jones, 65 Mo. 54. 

In statute. Clark v, Denton, i B. & Ad. 100. 

Madison Ins. Co. v. Forsythe, 2 Ind. 483. 

SHIP. In insurance policy. Hood v. Manhattan Fire Ins. Co., 11 N. Y. $33. 

In statute. Ex parte Ferguson, L. R., 6 Q. B. 280; Blanford v. Morri* 
son, 15 Q. B, 730; Pendleton v. Franklin, 7 N. Y. 508; Swift v. 
Brownell, t Holmes, 467 ; The Ontario, 2 Lowell, 40 ; The Floating 
Elevator, 8 Ben. 556 ; U. S. v. McArdle. 2 Sawyer, 367; The Mac, 46 
L. T. (N. S.) 907. 

" and her appurtenanoes. In statute. Gale v. Laurie, 5 B. & C. 

163. 

of the United States. In indictment. U. S. v. Howard, 3 Sum- 
ner, 18. 

of war. The Wilson, i Brock. 423. 

or veeseL In statute. The Nithsdale, i $ U. C. L. J. (N. S.) 268. 

American or vesseL In statute, U. S. v. Rogers, 3 Sumner, 

343. 
said In contract. Heard v. Holman, 16 C. B. (N. S.) 2. 

REnP-CEEAKDLERY. In statute. Weaver v. The Owens, i Wall. Jr. 359. 
8SXPMENT. Bowles v. Shand, 2 App. Cas. 4S5* 

In contract. Middleton v. Ballingall, i Cal. 417 ; Bowles v. Shand, 2 
App. Cas. 455. 

J>f statute. Ribble Nav. Co. v. Hargreaves, 17 C. R 385 ; New York 
Cent. R. Co. v. Fraloff, 100 U. S. 24. 

doooments. In contract. Tamoaca v. Lucas, i B. & S. 185 ; 3 

B. & S. 89. 

or vessels. In statute. Jones v. Coal Barges, 3 Wall. Jr. 53 ; 



&ECEETED. 



ssTPmra. 



SHIPS. 



328 



SHORT. 



SHIBBED. 



SHOOT. 
SHOOTING. 



— Continued. 

U. S. V, An open Boat, 5 Mason, 120 ; U. S. v. An open Boat, 5 
Mason, 232 ; Birbeck v. Hoboken Ferry Boats, 17 Johns. 54 ;l Many 
V. Noyes, 5 Hill, 34 ; Hicks v, Williams, 17 Barb. 523 ; Farmers De- 
light t/. Lawrence, 5 Wend. 564. 

one of her Mojesty's . In statute. The Cyhele, 2 Prob. Div. 

224. 

In insurance policy, Webb v. National Fire Ins. Co., 2 Sandf. 497. 

or corrugated goods. In contract, Goodyear v, Cary, 4 Blatchf • 

271. 

of wheat. Denbow v. State, 18 Ohio, it. 

at. In statute. State v. Vaughn, 26 Mo. 30. 

ezdiisive right of fishing and sporting over said flarm. 

Jeffreyes v, Evans, 19 0. B. (N. S.) 262. 

Jk bond, Dunham v, Gannett, 124 Mass. 151 ; 126 Mass. 151. 

In indictment. Sparrenberger v. State, 53 Ala. 481 ; Com. v, Riggs» 
14 Gray, 376 ; Ashworth v, He)rworth, 10 B. S. 314 ; Fearon v. 
Mitchell, L. R., 7 Q. B. 690. 

In statute, Wiltshire v, Willett, 1 1 0. B. 243 ; Ashworth v, Heyworth» 
L. R., 4 Q. B. 317 ; Sparrenberger v. State, 53 Ala. 481 ; re Creek, 3 
R & S. 459; Queen T/. Mannings L. R., x C. C. R. 340; Barth v. 
State, 18 Conn. 432 ; Pope v, Whalley, 6 B. & S. 312 ; Com. v, 
Annis, 15 Gray, 169; State t'. Carver, 5 Day, 131 ; State v, Bailey, 
10 Conn. 144 : Dunham v. Gannett, 126 Mass. 151 ; State v. Carrier^ 
5 Day, 151. 

attached to and being part of any dwelling-house. In 

statute, Wiltshire v. Baker, 1 1 C. B. (N. S.) 237 ; Wiltshire v, Wil- 
lett, 1 1 C. B. (N. S.) 240. 

or store. In statute. State v, Caney, 19 N. H. 135. 

store» or warehouse. In statute, Wilson v. State, 24 Conn. 57; 

Hathaway v. Wilson, 123 Mass. 359; Storer v. Freeman, 6 Mass. 43s 
(4 Am. Dec. 155) ; Bell v, Gough, 23 N. J. (L.) 624. 

In deed, Mather v. Chapman, 40 Conn. 382 ; Storer v. Freeman, 6 
Mass. 435 ; State v, Hudson Tunnel R. Co., 38 N. J. (L.) $4^. 

of the river. In deed, McCullough v, Wainwright, 14 Pa. St. 171 ; 

Child V, Starr, 4 Hill, 369 ; Yates v. Van De Bogert. 56 N. Y. 526 ; 
Bradford v, Cressy, 45 Me. 9. 

Storer v. Freeman, 6 Mass. 439 ; Martin v, O'Brien, 34 



8HOBT. 



Miss. 21 ; Cutts T/. Hussey, 15 Me. 237; Teschemacker v, Thomp- 
son, 18 Cal. 21 ; City of Galveston v, Menard, 23 Tex. 349; Sale v, 
Pratt, 19 Pick. 191 ; Com. v, Alger, 7 Cush. 66 ; Doane v. Broad St. 
Association, 6 Mass. 382 ; Trustees of Brook haven v. Strong, 60 N. 
Y. 56; Lovingston v. County of St. Clair, 64 IlL 56; Palmer v. 
Wicks, 6 Johns. 133 ; Hodge v, Boothby,48 Me. 71. 

In deed, Niles v. Patch, 13 Gray, 254 ; Hodge v, Boothby, 48 Me. 
71; Hampton v. Kirk, 6 Hun, 257 ; Dana v, Jackson St. Wharf, 31 
Cal. 120; Littlefield z/. Maxwell, 31 Me. 134; Storer t/. Freeman, 6 
Mass. 439. 

In deed, Scratton v. Brown, 4 B. & C. 503. 

privilege of the . In grant, Ripley v. Knight, 123 Mass. 515. 

In contract, Appleman v, Fisher, 34 Md. 540. 

entry. Blaine v. Bourne. 11 R. I. 119. 



shot-gun. 



329 



SIGNED. 



SHOUIJ). 



SHOW. 



SHOWING. 



SICKNKSS. 



In indictment. Edwards v. State. 27 Ark . 493. 

In statute. King z/. Mayor, i B. & Ad. 316. 

In will Hennessey v. Patterson, 85 N. Y. 100. 

be seotired. Toner v, Taggart, 5 'Binney, 496. 

U. S. V. Buffalo Park, 16 Blatchf. 189. 

forth in evidence. In statute. State v. Britt, 3 Dev. 122. 

public . In statute » Com. v. Gee, 6 Cush. 179. 

Spalding v. Spalding, 3 How. Pr. 297. 

I>ettifogging . In libel. Bailey v. Kalamazoo Publishing Co.,. 

40 Mich. 251. 

Kelly V. Ancient Order of Hibernians, 10 Reporter, 151. 

In contract. Burton v. Eyden, L. R., 8 Q. B. 295. 

In insurance policy. Newton v. Mut. Ins. Co., 76 N. Y. 426. 

In statute. Queen v. Inhabitants, 3 El. & Bl. 587 ; Queen v. Inhabit- 
ants, 7 El. & Bl. 796. 

no or disease. In insurance application. Ins. Co. v. Francisco> 

17 Wall. 672. 

time of the last . In statute. Harrington v. Stees, 82 111. 50. 

on the of the road. Jenny v. Brook, 6 Q. B. 330. 

of any carriage-way. In statute. Easton v. Richmond Bd., L. 



R., 7 Q. B. 69. 

— of the road. In statute. Marshall v. St. Louis & I. M. R. R., 51 
Mo. 138. 

— of such rocuL In statute. Beckett v. Upton, 5 El. & Bl. 630. 



SIDBWAI«K. 
SEDSWAIiKS. 
SIGHT. 
SIGNATUBE. 



SIGN. 



SIGHED. 



42 



Porter v. Waring, 69 N. Y, 250. 

In deed. Porter v. Waring, 2 Abb. N. C. 230. 

In not^. Sturdy v. Henderson, 4 B. & Aid. 593. 

Troller v. Walker, 13 C. B. (N. S.) 35 ; Zacharie v. Franklin, 12 Pet. 
151 ; Chapman v. Limerick, 56 Me. 390; Stevens v. Ewer, 2 Mete 74. 

In statute. Holden v. Jenkins, 125 Mass. 447; People t/. Chapman, 4 
Park C. C. 56. 

James v. Patten, 6 N. Y. 9 ; Miller v. Pelletier, 4 Edw. 102. 

In statute. Roberts v. Phillips, 4 El. & Bl. 450. 

did not . In plea. Holman v. Carhart, 25 Ga. 608. 

In deed. Stuart v. Dutton, 39 III. 91. 

In plea. Ricketts v. Harvey, 78 Ind. 152. 

In statute. St. Louis Hospital Asso. v. Williams, 19 Mo. 600 ; North- 
cutt V. Northcutt, 20 Mo. 266 ; Catlett v. Catlett, 55 Mo. 330 ; Viners 
V. Clingfoot, 2t Ark. 312; Clason v. Bailey, 14 Johns. 484; People z/» 
Murray, 5 Hill, 468 ; Gurnee v. Chicago, 40 111. 165 ; Brumfitt v. 
Bremner, 9 C. B. (N. S.) 18 ; Baker v. Dening, 8 Ad. & El. 96. 

by the parties. In statute. Reeves v. Pye, i Cranch C. C. 219 ; 

Argenbright v. Campbell, 3 Hen. & M. (Va.) 144 ; Henry v. Root, 33 
N. Y. 526 ; Campbell v. Thomas, 42 Wis. 437 ; Cagger v. Lansing, 57 
Barb. (N. Y.) 421 ; 43 N. Y. 550 ; Bandes v. Amhurst, Finch Prec. in 
Oh. 402 ; Hawkins v. Holmes, i P. Wms. 770 ; Selby v. Selby, 3 
Meriv. 2; Hubert v. Moreau, 12 Mor. 216; Hubert t/. Turner, 4 
Scott N. R. 486 ; Bailees ?/. Ogden, 3 Johns. (N. Y.) 399; Anderson v. 
Harrold, 10 Ohio, 399 ; Barry v. Law, i Cranch C. C. 77 ; Wade v. 
Cityof Newbern, 77 N. C. 460; Wheeler v. Newton, Prec. in Ch. 16; 



SIGNED. 330 SIT. 

filOmSD— Continued. 

S. C, 2 Eq. Cas. 44, c. 5 ; Worrall v, Munn, 5 N. Y. 229 ; Farris v. 
Martin, 10 Humph. (Tenn.) 495 ; Lemayne v, Stanley, 3 Lev, i ; 
Warneford v. Warneford, Stra. 764; Gryle v. Giyle, 2 Atk. 177; 
Grayson v, Atkinson, 2 Ves. Sr. 454; Smith v. Evans i Wiis. 313; 
Wright V, Wakeford, 17 Ves. 459 ; Morrison v. Tumour, 18 Ves. 175; 
Schneider t'. Norris, 2 Maule & S. 286; Wilson v. Beddard, 12 Sim. 
28 ; Taylor a/. Denning, 3 Nev. & P. 228 ; Jackson v. Van Dusen, 5 
Johns. (N. Y.) 144; In re Field, 3 Curt (EccL) 752; Saundersonv. 
Jackson, 3 Esp. 180 ; Com. v» Ray, 3 Gray (Mass.)* 447 ; Lerned v. 
Wannemacher, 9 Allen (Mass.), 417 ; Vielte v, Osgood, 8 Barb. 139; 
Davis V, Shields, 26 Wend. 351 ; Pitts v. Beckett, 13 Mees. ft W. 

743. 
and Maled. In deed. Tubbs v. Gatewood, 26 Ark. 128. 

by the testator. In statute, Watson v. Pipes, 32 Miss. 462. 

sealed and deliTered. In insurance policy. Xenos v. Wickfaam, 

L. R., 2 H. L. 296. 

SIGHING. from the time of the Judgment In statute. Galbraith v. Side- 

ner, 28 Ind. 142. 

fllLK. In statute. Swan v, Arthur, 13 Otto, 597. 

gloves. In statute, Arthur v. Unkert, 6 Otto, 1 19. 

veils. In statute. Arthur v. Morrison, 6 Otto, 109. 

manntKotnres of — r. In statute, Abrams v. Bancroft, 3 Sumn. 3&4- 

soft or organsine . In deed. Elliott v. Turner, 2 C. R 446. 

filLEB. in a manufttotured or nnmanulkotaxed state. In statuu, 

Bernstein v, Baxendale, 6 C. B. (N. S.) 252; Davey z^. Mason, i Car. 
& M. 46. 
wrought up with other materials. In statute. Brant v. Mid- 
land R. Co., 2 H. A C. 890. 

— plate. In statute, Atwater v. Inhabitants of Woodbridge, 6 ConiL 
223 (16 Am. Dec. 46). 

— importations. In statute. Ullman t^. Murphy, 11 Blatchf. 35& 

— jurisdiction. In statute, Chahoon v. State, 21 Gratt. 822. 

— nature^ i)a6kage» value and quality. In sttUute. Southamp- 
ton Dock Co. V, Hill, 14 C. B. (N. S.) 243. 

— oflbnse. In statute. Com. v. Fountain, 127 Mass. 452. 
pieces of gold or silver oounterfbit ooin. lu statute. Brown 



V. Com., 8 Mass. S9- 
goods of description. In statute, Greenleaf v, Goodrich, 11 

Otto, 283. 

SmililTUDE . In statute. State v, McKenzie, 42 Me. 392. 
SIMULTAKEOnSIiY. King v, Werner, 12 Blatchf. 270. 

SINCE. October 6th. In notice, Monroe v, Ackworth, 41 N. H. 201. 

SINQ'IiR and unmarried. In order. Queen v. Inhabitants, 2 Q. B. $41^ 

dwelling-house. In deed, Gillis v, Bailey, 21 N. H. 149. 

man. In statute. Silver v, Ladd, 7 Wall. 219. 

woman. ' In statute. Queen v. Pilkington, 2 £1. & Bl. 347. 

8ISTEB. In statute. Wheeler v, Clutterbuck, 52 N. Y. 67. 

BI8TEBS. In will. Wood v, Mitchell, 61 How. Pr. 48. 

SIT. in any case. In constitution. Cock v. State, 8 Tex. (App.) 660. 



SITES. 



331 



SOLDIER. 



SITES. 

SITTINGS. 

SmiATE. 

SmiATION. 
fir 



SKUTCHINQ'. 



SlaEBFING. 



SUT. 

siJOiraH. 

HSgJSQtQfLK, 

SNUYF. 

SO. 

soDomr 



SOJOTJHNING. 
80IJ>. 



In stat'ote. State v, Jersey City, 7 Vroom, 166. 

Gird T/. State, i Oregon, 308. 

Orr V. Baker, 4 Ind. ^. 

In insurance policy. Heath v, Franklin Ins. Co., i Oush. 257. 

Buesching v, St. Louis Gaslight Co., 73 Mo. 219. 

day of the term. In statute. Wash v, Randolph, 9 Mo. 142. 

In insurance policy, Astor v. Union Ins. Co., 7 Cow. 203. 

In statute, Hardcastle v, Jones, 3 B. & S. 160. 

Pollard V, Lyon, 91 U. S. 225 ; Cochran v. Batterfield, 18 R. I. 115. 

rent. Jones v. Shears, 2 Harr. & W. 43. 

In statute, Thompson v. Mayor, 11 N. Y. 115. 

the noee. * In statute. Rex v, Carroll, i Leach, 55 ; i East P. C. 

394. 
Dunleith Bridge Co. v. County of Dubuque, 55 Iowa, 565. 

U. S. V, Claflin, 13 Blatchf. 178; U. S. v, Thomas, 2 Abb. (U. S.) 114. 

In statute, Venable v, Richards, i Hughes, 327. 

In will, Giles v, Melson, L. R., 6 H. L. 24 ; Hall v, Warren, 9 H. L. 
Cas. 420. ^ 

Rex V, Duffin, i East P. C. 437 ; Rex v, Reekspear, i Moody C. C. 342 ; 
Rex V, Cousins, 6 0. & P. 351 ; Rex v, Mulreaty, i Russ., C.& M. 
938 ; Rex V, Jacobs, Russ. & Ry. 331 ; Rex v, Jellyman, 8 C. & P. 
604; Rex V, Allen, i Den. C. C. 364; Com. v, Thomas, i Va. Cas. 
307 ; Ausman v. Veal, 10 Ind. 356. 

Pretty v, Solly, 26 Beav. 606 ; Reg. v. Wood, 5 El. & Bl. 55. 
In statute. Butter t/. Hopper, i Wash. 500; Henry t/. Ball, i Wheat, i. 

In affidavit, Hargreaves v, Hayes, 5 El. & Bl. 272. 

In contract, Russell v, Nicoll, 3 Wend. 122 (20 Am. Dec. 670) ; Phila- 
delphia V, Collector, 5 Wall. 720. 

In plea, Staunton v, Henderson, i Smith, 54. 

and conveyed. In pica. Burpee v, Sparhawk, 97 Mass. 342 ; 

McDonald v. Campbell, 2 S. &. R. 473. 

— but not removed. In insurance policy. Waring v. Indemnity 
Fire Ins. Co., 45 N. Y. 606 (6 Am. Rep. 146). 

or conveyed. In insurance policy. Oakes v. Manufacturers 

Ins. Co., 131 Mass. 164; Dailey t/. Westchester Ins. Co., 131 Mass. 

173. 

or otherwise dispoeed o£ In statute, Piatt v. Union Pacific 

R. Co., 9 Otto, 49; U. S. V, Watkin, 7 Otto, 219. 

or removed for sale. In statute. Lilienthal's Tobacco v, U. S., 

7 Otto, 237. 

goods so . In statute. Atherton v. Newhall, 123 Mass. 141 

I have . In deed. Reaves v. Ore Knob Copper Co., 74 N. C. 593. 

shall be and conveyed. In insurance policy, Hoffman v. Ohio 

Ins. Co., 32 N. Y. 405. 

to be . Taylor v, Galloway, i Ohio, 232 (13 Am. Dec. 605). 

In statute. Horton v, Leeds, 5 El. & Bl. 595 ; Barker v. Cheslefield, 
102 Mass. 129. 

in actual military servioe. In statute. Dnimmond v. Parish, 

3 Curties, 351 ; Leathers v, Greenacre, 53 Me. 561 ; Smith's Will, 6 



SOLDIER. 



332 



SOUTH. 



SOIiDnSB— Continued. 

Phila. 104 ; Gould v. Safford, 39 Vt 498 ; Botsford v. Krake, i Abb. 
Pr. (N. S.) 112. 

SOUS. In statute, Logan v. Bell, i C. B. 9»6. 

In will. Re Bailej, L. R., i P. & D. 628. 

aadexoliisive. Halford v. Bailey, 8 Q. B. 1000; 13 Q. R 437. 

-^^ use. In will, Lewis v, Mathews, L. R., 2 £q. Gas. 177 ; Smith 
V, Wells, 7 Mete. 243; Evans v. Knorr, 4 Rawle, 69. 

lue and disposal. In will. Bland v, Dawes, 17 Ch. Div. 794. 

for her and separate use. In statute, Duechaud v, Benej, 4S 



SOUCITOBS. 
SOLVENT. 



SOME. 



SON. 



SON& 



SOON. 



SOBT. 
SOXTND. 



SOTJBCE. 



SOUTH. 



Ala. 591. 

— oooasions. In constitution, 37, Mo. 135. 



Pearson v, Howey, 11 N. J. (L.) 12. 

In statute. Ex parte Liebenbauer, 14 Nev. 365. 

Herrick v, Borst, 4 Hill, 650. 

oredits. In statute, Alabama Gold Life Ins. Co. v. Lott, $4 Ah. 

499- 
means. Elf el t v. Snow, 2 Sawyer. 100. 

other good oause. In statute. Re Jackson, 7 Biss. 280. 

suit or action. In statute. Cooper v, Hubbock, 12 C. H. (N. S.) 



456. 



writing. In statute, McClellan v. McClellan, 65 Me. 500. 



In will, Le Haute v, Hobson, 5 B. & C. 903 ; Burrin v, Charlton, i 
Man & G. 439; East v. Twyford, 4 H. L. Cas. 517. 

the of B. In will, Sampson v, Randell, 72 Me 109. 

and daughters. In will. Jamison v. Hay, 46 Mo. 546; Smith's 



Case, 2 Desau. 123. 

In contract, Sanford v. Shepard, 14 Kans. 228 , Waddell v. Reddick, 2 
Ired. (L.) 424; Ubsdell v, Pierson, 22 Mo. T24. 

as as may be. In statute, Bently v. Ward, 1 16 Mass. 333. 

as as possible. Lt contract. Atwood v, Emery, i C. B. (K. S.) 

Ill ; Palmer v, Ins. Co., 6 Rep. 413 ; Hydraulic Co. v. McHaffie,4 Q* 
B. Div. 670. 

In insurance policy, Columbia Ins. Co. v, Laurence, 10 Pet. 507. 

if not . In will, Peters v, Carr, 16 Mo. 54. 

In statute. State v. Howard, 72 Me. 459. 

Bell V. Jeffries, 13 Ired. (L.) 356; Best v. Osborne, Ry. & M. 29a 

In contract. Hawkins v. Pemberton, 35 How. Pr. 376; Kiddell f'. 
Burnard, 9 M. & W. 670 ; Maigetson v. Wright, i Moore & S. 622. 

and disposing mind and memory. Den v. Johnson. 2 Soath. 

455 (8 Am Dec. 610); Harrison v. Rowan, 3 Wash. »C. C. 580; 
Stevens v Van Cleve. 4 Wash. C. C. 262 ; Lowe v. Williamson, 2 
N. J. (Eq.) 82 ; Hall v. linger, 2 Abb. U. S. 507. 

discretion. Mayor v. Radecke, 49 Md. 217. 

mind. Lowder v. Lowder, 58 Ind. 538. 

mind and memory. Yoe v. McCord, 74 111. 33. 

of the most southern branch of the Ooonee river. Ik treatf. 



Patterson v, Jenks, 2 Pet. 216. 
Cronin v. Richardson. 8 Allen, 424. 



SOUTH. 333 SPECIAL^ 

SOUTH — Continued. 

half. In deed. Prentiss v. Brewer, \^ Wis. 635. 

sea. In patent, Keyser v, Coe, 9 Blatchf. 32. 

SOUTHEBIiY. In statute, Rowe v. Smith. 48 Conn. 450. 

SOVEEtEIGK. Chisholm v, Gergia, 2 Dallas, 419. 

flPAir. of horses. In statute. Ames v. Martin, 6 Wis. 362. 

SFABE. all I have to . In contract, Parker v. Pettit, 43 N. J. (L.) 512. 

8PAWH. In statute. Mayor v, Woolvet, 12 Ad. & Ell. 13. 

act. In statute. Queen t^. D'Oyly, 12 Ad. & Ell. 139; Cox v. 

State,- 8 Tex. (App.) 254. 

— and extraordinary oiroumstanoes. Ik statute, Dockery v, 
McDowell, 40 Ala. 476. 

— baiL Jack v. People, 19 111. 57. 
— »- ease. In statute. Re Levy, i Ben. 508. 

— oaseo. In constitution. Ward v. Flood, 48 Cal. 36 ; Parson v, 
Tuolumne Co. Water Co., 55 Cal. 43 ; People v, Kern Co., 45 Cal. 
679 , Spencer Creek Water Co. v, Vallego, 48 Cal. 70 ; Benson v. 
Cromwell, 6 Abb. Pr. 83 ; Beecher v. Allen, 5 Barb. 169 ; Hall v. 
Nelson, 23 Barb. 88; Griswoldz/. Sheldon, 4 N. Y. 581 ; Frees v. 
Ford, 6 N. Y. 176 ; Kundorf v. Thalheimer, 12 N. Y. 593 ; Doubleday 
V, Heath, 16 N. Y. 80; People v. Main, 20 N. Y, 434 ; Arnold v, Rees, 
18 N. Y. 57. 

— Girotunstanoes. In statute. Re Robinson, L. R., 3 Ex. 4 ; Wat- 
son V, Rodwell, 27 W. R. 265 ; Grant v. Bk., 2 0. P. Div. 431 ; 
Lowery v. Perry, 85 N. C. 135. 

— oontraot. In statute, Bramston v. Mayor, 6 El. & Bl. 252 ; 
Peek V, North Stoflfordshire, etc., R. Co., i El. B. & El. 960. 

damage. Shafer v, Ahalt, 48 Md. 171 ; Roberts v. Graham, 6 



Wall. 578. 

In statute. Griffin v, Sanborton, 44 N. H. 247. 

deposit. Wright v, Paine, 62 Ala. 341. 

deposits. In statute. National Bk. v, Graham, 10 Otto, 699, 

law. In constitution, Hymes v, Aydelott, 26 Ind. 431 ; Streeter 

V, People, 69 111. 595 ; Hingie v. State, 24 Ind. 28 ; Toledo, etc., R. 
Co. V, Nordyke, 27 Ind. 95; ex parte Westerfield, 55 Cal. 550; 
Smith V, Judge, 17 Cal. 547 ; Montgomery v. Com., 91 Pa. St. 125 ; 
River Rendering Co. v. Bebr. 7 Mo. (App.) 346 ; State v, Watson, 71 
Mo. 470; State v, Tolle, 71 Mo. 646 ; State v. Shields, 4 Mo. (App.) 260 ; 
State v. County Comrs., 29 Md. 516; County Comrs. v. Comrs., 
51 Md. 457; County Comrs. z/. Meekins, 50 Md. 280; State?/. Squires, 
26 Iowa, 340; Porter v, Thompson, 22 Iowa, 391 ; McGregor v, 
Baylies, 19 Iowa 43; People v, Wallace, 70 111. 680; People v. 
Wright, 70 IH. 388 ; State v, St. Louis, etc., R. Co., 9 Mo. (App.) 
532. 

In statute, Cordovas. State, 6 Tex. (App.) 207; Graves v. State, 6 
Tex. (App.) 228 ; Benjamin v. State, 6 Tex. (App.) 265 ; Handlinet/. 
State, 6 Tex. (App.) 347 ; Lastro v. State, 3 Tex. (App.) 363 ; Bohl v- 
State, 3 Tex. (App.) 683. 

meeting. Cutbill v. Kingdom, i Ex. 494. 

or looal law. In constitution. Clarke v. Jack, 6u Ala. 271. 

power. In statute, Harris v. Harbeson, 9 Bush, 404. 



SPECIAL. 334 SPREAD. 

— Continued. 

privilege. In statute. Ex parte Douglass, i Utah, io8. 

proceeding to enlbroe a penalty or Harftitiire. In staiuu. 

People V. Cohocton Stone Road, 25 Hun, 14. 

proceedings. In statute. Hyatt v. Seeley, 11 N. Y. 52; Alien 

V. Partlow, 3 S. C. 417 ; Ernst v. The Brooklyn, 24 Wis. 616; le 
Dodd, 27 N. Y. 629. 

purpoee. In statute. Queen v. Powell, L. R., 8 Q. R 403. 

flCMione. In statute. King v Justices, 2 R & Aid. 233. 

term. In statute, Gracie v, Freeland/ i N. Y. 228. 

writ. In statute. Ball v. Swan, i B. A Aid. 39$. 

authorised. In statute. Com. v. Ducey, 126 Mass. 269. 

In statute. Frazer v. Tunis, i Burney, 254. 

Kimball v. Whitney, 15 Ind. 280* Bank of U. S.' v. Donnelly, 8 Pet 
361 ; Seymour v. Street, 5 Neb 85 ; Randolf v. King, 2 Bond. 104. 

In statute, David v. Porter 51 Iowa, 254. 

Henry V Bank of Salina, 5 Hill 523- Trebilcock v. Wilson, 12 Wall 
687. 

In note. Webb v. Moore, 4 T. B. Mon. 483. 

boll. In statute. Oil t/ Rowley, 69 III. 469. 

8FE0IFIC. oaiise. In statute. Ryhope Coal Co. v. Foyer, 9 Q. B. Div.4Ss. 

denial. Gas Co. v. San Francisco, 9 Cal. 453. 

legacy* Dryden v. Owings, 49 Md. 357 ; Parker v. Moore, 2$ 

N. J. (Eq.) 228 ; Landon v. Astor, 3 Duer, 477. 

BPEOEPICALLY. In will. Giles v. Melsom, L. R., 6 H. L. 24. 

deviaed. In will. Homer v. Shelton, 2 Mete. 208. 

dispoaed of In will. Roberts v. Cooke, 16 Ves. 451. 

BPSUJUriCATIOlN'. Lampton v, Preston, i J. J. Marsh. 454 (19. Am. Dec. 104). 

In statute. Wilson v. Coon, 6 Fed. Rep. 611. 

SPECIFIED. In statute. Page v. Ordway, 40 N. H. 257. 

SPENDTHRIFT. Morey's Appeal, 57 N. H. 54. 

SPIBITOT7S. In indictment. Com. ?/. Burke, 1 5 Gray, 408 ; Com. v. Herrick, 6 Cush. 

468. 

SPIBmiAIi. In indictment. State v. Clark, 3 Ind. 451. 

SPntrrUOTTS. in statute. Com. v. Herrick, 6 Cush. 468 ; Com. v. Crawford, 12 Cush. 

272 ; Com. V. Gray, 2 Gray, 502 ; Com. v. Livermore, 4 Gray, 20. 

liquor. In indictment. Com. «/. White, 10 Mete. 14; State v. 

Adams, 51 N. H. 568. 

In statute. Fritz v. State, 57 Tenn. 15 ; Com v, Herrick, 6 Cush. 465; 
Walker v. Prescott, 44 N. H. 511 ; State v. Moore, 5 Blackf. 118; 
Caswell V. State, 2 Humph. 402; Smith v. State, 19 Conn. 493; 
State V. Bennett, 3 Harr. (Del.) 565 ; State v. Simmey, Winston, 108, 

liquors not otherwise enumerated. In statute. Dallet v. 

Sm3rth, 6 Blatch£ 421. 

SPITTIKG-. of blood. In insurance application. Singleton v. St. Louis Mut 

Ins. Co., 66 Mo. 63. 

SPOILED. lumber. In contract. Harris v. Rathbun, 2 Keyes, 312. 

SPOBTING. In statute. Nagle v. Brown, 37 Ohio St 9. 

SPBEAD. any awning. In city ordinance. State v. Cleveland, 3 R. I. n;. 



SPJilNG. 



335 



STATE. 



SPRING. 

SFUBIOXJB. 

SQUABS. 



8QT7ABE8. 
STAB. 



STABLE 
STACK. 



STAGE. 



STAKED. 

STAI.E. 

STALL. 

STALLAGE. 

STALLION. 

STAND. 



STANDING. 



next term. In writ, Anderson v, Pearce, 36 Ark. 29s. 

Kirby v. State, i Ohio St. 185. 

Methodist Church v. Mayor, 33 N. J. (L.) 13. 

In statute, Caldwell v, Rupert, 10 Bush, 179. 

yard. In contract, Louisville v. Hyatt, 2 B. Mon. 177. 

Streets or places. In statute, Paul v, James, i Q. B. 832. 

In indictment. Ruby v. State, 7 Mo. 206 ; State v, Patza, 3 La. Ann. 

512 ; Ward v. State, 56 Ga. 408. 

or out. In statute. Rex v, McDermott, i Russ. & Ry. 356. 

stick or thrust. In indictment, Gibson v. Com. 2 Va. Cas. iii. 

In writ. Lady Dacre's Case, i Lev. 58. 

Reg. V. Munson, 2 Cox C. C. 186. 

of straw. In indictment. Queen v, Satchwell, L. R., 2 C. C. 

R. 21. 

In statute. Rex v. Turner, i Moody, 239 ; Rex v, Newell, i Moody, 460. 

of wheat. Denbow v. State, 18 Ohio, 11. 

driver. In statute, Littlefield v, Leland, 8 >ie. 185. 

play. In statute. Day v. Simpson, 18 C. B. (N. S.) 681. 

wagon. In statute. Queen v, Roscoe, 8 Ad. & Ell. 386 ; East- 
well V. Richmond, 18 C. B. (N. S.) 376 ; Comley v. Carpenter, 18 C. 
B. (N. S.) 378 ; Pearsall v, Tazewell, 19 C. B. (N. S.) 390. 

out. In order. Boston v. Richardson, 105 Mass. 371. 

claim. The G. C. Morris, 2 Abb. (U. S.) 164. 



Mayor of Yarmouth v. Groom, i H. & C. 103. 

Mayor of Yarmouth v. Groom, i H. & C. 103. 

Aylesworth v. Chicago, etc., R. Co., 30 Iowa, 459. 

In city ordinance. Com. z/. Matthews, 122 Mass. 60; Com. z/. Elliott, 
121 Mass. 367. 

oommittedi Young v. Makepeace, 103 Mass. 57. 

by. State v. HoUoway, 8 Blackf. 45 ; Gatling v, Rodman, 6 Ind. 

289. 

riding or being upon the platform of moving railway 

Gioaches. In accident insurance policy, Sawtelle v. Railway Pass. 
Ass. Co., 15 Blatchf. 216. 

loss of in society. In instructions, Barnes v. Martin, 15 Wis. 

246. 

twelve years . In statute, Digges v, Eleason, 4 Cranch C. C. 

619. 

In constitution, Hepburn v, Ellzey 2 Cranch, 445 ; Texas v. White, 
7 Wall. 700; U. S. V, Reese, 2 Otto, 215 ; Seton v, Hanham, R. M. 
Charlt. 374. 

In statute, Scott t/. Jones, 5 How. 343; Re Br3rant, i Deady, 118. 

constable. Com. v, Connolly, 97 Mass. 591 ; Com. v. Intoxicat- 
ing Liquors, 97 Mass. 63. 

institutions. In constitution, Chalfant v. State, 37 Ohio St. 60. 

jaU or penitentiary. In statute, U. S. v. Schroeder, 14 Blatchf. 



344. 



of cultivation. In statute, Johnson v, Perley, 2 N. H. 56 (9 



Am. Dec. 35). 



STA TE. 336 STEAMSHIP, 



STATE — Continued. 

oilloer. In amstituiioH, Donohoe v. County of Will, 100 III. 106. 

offioen. In constitution. Re Janitor, 35 Wis. 410. 

priaoiL In statute, Martin v, Martin, 47 N. H. 52. Sedbeny 

V, Carver, n N. C. 319. 

In verdict, Moore v. State, 7 Tex. (App.) 24; McCoy v. State, /Tex. 
(App.) 379 ; Harris v. State, 8 Tex. (App.) 90. 

the eyidanoe and charge the law. In constitution, ConDor v. 

State, 4 Yerg. 127 (26 Am. Dec. 217). 

tazea. In constitution, Youngblood v. Sexton, 32 Mich. 406 

(20 Am. Rep. 654). 

the testimony. In statute, Dorant v. Burt, 98 Mass. 168. 

oonyioted within this . In statute, U. S. v. Bamabo, 14 Blatch£ 

74. 

out of the jurisdiction of any partioolar . In statute. U.S. 

V, Pirates, 5 Wheat. 184. 

return into the . In statute. Smith v. Bond, 8 Ala. 386. 

BTATSD. -;— attendants upon diyina worship. People v, TuthilL 31 N. Y. 

550. 

STATBMJfiJNT. In statute. People v, Lee, 14 Cal. 510 ; People v. Strong, 30 CaL 151. 

6f fkots. In statute. Essex Co. Bk. v, Russell, 29 N. Y. 673. 

BTATZNO*. Spalding v, Spalding, 3 How. Pr. 297. 

STATION. In statute. State v. New Haven, etc., R. Co., 41 Conn. 134; U. S. v. 

Phisterer, 94 U. S. 219; Andrew v, U. S., is Ct. of CI. 264. 

BTATIOHEBY. In statute, Comrs. v, Koons, i Col. Terr. 160 ; Gomrs. Court v, 

Goldthwait, 3S Ala. 704. 

BTATUTB. books of sister states. InstatuU. Bright v. White, 8 Mo. 422. 

against the fbrm of the . In indictment. Rex v, Pim. i Russ. k 

Ry. 427. 
BTATX7TBS. In statute. Queen v, Bakewell, 7 El. & Bl. 849. 

of limitation. Battle v. Shivers, 39 Ga. 405. 

by virtue of the for the distribution of estates of persons 

dying intestate. In will, Sturge v. Great Western R Co., 19 
Ch. Div. 444. 

'STAY. In constitution, Pett3rjohn v, Bloxom, t Houst. 594. 

and trade. In insurance policy. Company of Merchants v. Ins. 

Co., L. R., 8 Ex. 159. 

•STBAIi. Dunnell v, Fiske, 11 Mete. 551. 

In indictment. State v, Mann, 25 Ohio St. 668; Green v. Com., in 
Mass. 418. 

In statute, Alexander v. State. 12 Tex. 540. 

or take from the mail any letter. In statute, U. S. v. Pearoe, 

2 McLean, 16. 

plunder or . In statute. Pitman v, U. S., 1 Sprague, 196. 

STEAUNG. In statute. Queen v, Martin, 8 Ad. & El. 487. 

STEAMBOAT. clause. In insurance policy. Western Ins. Co. v. Cropper. 32 

Pa. St. 351. 

debts. In contract, Moran v, Prather, 23 Wall. 492. 

STEAMSHDP. In contract, Fraser v. Telegraph Co., L. R., 7 Q. B. 566. 



STEER. 337 STONES. 

8TEEB. Bt indtctment. State v. Abbott, 20 Vt 537. 

beef In indictment, Robertson v. State, i Tex. (App.) 312. 

8TEEBS. In statute. Wessels v. Territory, McCahon, 100. 

STBBIJNG. In note. Sprowle v, Legg, i B. & C. 17 ; Picado v. Machado, 4 B. & C* 

886 ; Taylor v. Booth, i C. & P. 286. 

SnOKB. Cincinnati, etc., R. Co. v, Dickey, 30 Ohio St 16. 

SnPUIaATED. and oonditidned. In agreement, Henniker t^. Watt, 8 B. & C. 31$. 

STTPUULTION. Hill v. Fox, 4 Hurl. & N. 362. 

in writing waiving a jury. In statute. Supervisors v. Kenni- 

cott, 13 Otto, 554. 

Trask v. Maguire, 18 Wall. 391. 

In insurance policy. Spratley v. Hartford Ins. Co., i Dill. 392; Har- 
per V. Albany Ins. Co., 17 N. Y. 194. 

In statute. Ulverstone R. Co. v. Comm*rs, 2 H. & C. 85$ ; People v. 
Comm'rs of Taxes, 23 N. Y. 192; Auditor v. New Albany, etc., R, 
Co., 1 1 Ind. $70 ; State v. Hamilton, 5 lad. 310 : Michigan, etc., R. 
Co. V. Porter, 17 Ind. 380. 

and movable property. In will. Wood v. George, 6 Dana, 34^ 

in trade. In statute. Palfrey v. Boston, loi Mass. 329 ; re Jones, 

2 Dillon, 343 ; Guptil v. McFee, 9 Kans* 30 ; Bequillard v. Bartlett, 
19 Kans. 382 ; Wilcox v. Middlesex Comm'rs, 103 Mass. $45. 

of hair wrought new and in prooeaa. In insurance policy. 

Medina!/. Builders* Ins. Co., 120 Mass. 225. 

of my fbrma. In will. Cox v. Godsalve, 6 East, 605, note. 

note. Dunlap v. Smith, 12 111. 399. 

upon my flam. In will. West v. Moore, 8 East, 339. 

•^— nsnally kept in oonntry atorea. In insurance policy. Pindar 
V. Kings Co. Ins. Co., 36 N. Y. 648. 

capital . In statute. Han. & St. Joe R. R. v. Shacklett, 30 Mo. 

550 ; St. Louis, etc., R. Co. v. Lofton, 30 Ark. 693 ; Griffith v. Watsoot 
19 Kans. 23. 

hia of goods. In contract. Knight v. Parker, 25 111. 593. 

fitrming . In will. Evans v. Williamson, 17 Ch. Div. 696. 

Ikffming of every kind and deaoripticm. In will. Vaisey v. 

Reynolds, 5 Russ. 16. 

all my live and dead , In will. Rudgez/. Winnall, i2Beav. 357* 

other live and dead . In will. Blake v. Gibbs, s Russ. 13. 

In statute. McClaren v. Franciscus, 43 Mo. 452 ; Mills v. Stewart, 
41 N. Y. 384. 
DIiDEBS. In statute. Burr v. Wilcox, 22 N. Y. 551. 

, ftinda or annuitiea. In statute. Morris v. Manisty, 7 Q. B. 

675. 

on the . In insurance policy. Hood v. Manhattan Ins. Co., 11 N. 

Y. 532. 
Ih statute. Fisher v. Lee, 12 Ad. & Ell. 623. 

or other thing. In statute. Radnorshire Bd. v. Evans, 3 R & 

S. 402. 
all minea and minerala, aand, quarriea of , briok earth and 

gravel pita. In deed. Tucker v. Singer, 46 L. T. (N. S.) 894. 

In statute. Hatch v. Hawkes, 126 Mass. i77- 
48 



STOPPAGE. 



338 



STRA Y. 



STOPPAGE. 



in tranflita. Inslee v. Lane, 57 N. H. 454; The Constantia, 6 



STOBEHOTJSB. 



8TOBING. 



Rob. (Adm.) 321 ; D'Aquila v, Lambert, 2 Eden Ch. 77 ; Gibson v. 
Carruthers, 8 M. & W. 337 ; Fraschieris v, Henriques, 6 Abb. Pr. 
251 ; Wilmshurst v, Bowker, 2 M. & G. 792 ; Chandler v, Fulton. 10 
Tex. 2; Newhall v. Vargas, 13 Me. 93 ; Reynolds v. Boston, etc., R- 
Co.. 43 N. H. 580 ; Ryberg v. Snell, 2 Wash. C. C. 403 ; White v, 
Welsh, 38 Pa. St. 396 ; Whitehead v. Anderson. 9 M. & W. 454. 

In lease. Hooper v, Farnsworth, 128 Mass. 487; Riddle v. Littlefield, 
53 N. H. 503 ; Ammidown v. Granite Bank, 8 Allen, 293. 

In indictment. Com. v, Whalen, 131 Mass. 419. 

In statute. Spanenberger v. State, 53 Ala. 481 ; Barth v. State, iS 
Conn. 432; Com. v. Annis, 1$ Gray, 197. 

flxtnres. In insurance policy. Whit'marsh v. Conway Fire Ins. 

Co., 16 Gray, 359. 

. In statute. Ray v. Com., 12 Bush, 397; State v. Sandy, 3 I red. (L.) 

570. 
In statute. U. S. v. Coils of Cordage, i Baldw. 502 ; Gilpin, 299. 

In insurance policy. O'Neil v. Buffalo Fire Ins. Co., 3 N. Y. 1 22 ; 
Langdon v. Equitable Ins. Co., i Hall, 226 ; Rafferty v. New Bruns- 
wick, etc., Ins. Co., 18 N. J. (L.) 480 (38 Am. Dec. 525). 

gunpowder. In insurance policy. City Fire Ins. Co. v. Cor- 

lies, 21 Wend. 367 (34 Am. Dec. 258). 

or keeping. In insurance policy. Williams v. Firemen's Fund 



BTOBM. 
STOVE. 



STBAIGHT. 
STBAin). 

8TBAin)ED. 



BTBAKDING. 



8TBA17GEBS. 
STRAW. 



Ins. Co., 54 N. Y. 569; Hynds v, Schenectady Ins. Co., 11 N. Y. 554; 
16 Barb. 119. 

keeping and . In insurance policy, Westfall v. Hudson, etc, R 

Co., 12 N. Y. 29a 

fire or . In insurance policy. Stover v. Ins. Co., 3 Phila. 38. 

a small . In insurance policy. Daniels v. Equitable Ins. Co^ 48 

Conn. 115. 

Harris v. Tumbridge, 83 N. Y. 92. 

line. In statute. Chenery v. Inhabitants of Waltham, 8 Cosh. 

332. 
Doane v. Wilcutt, 5 Gray, 335. 

In insurance policy. Potter v. Suffolk Ins. Co., 2 Sumn. 197. 

In insurance policy. Rayner v. Godmand, 5 B. & Aid. 225 ; Barrow tr. 
Bell, 4 B. & C. 736 ; Corcoran v. Gumey, i El. & Bl. 457 ; Bishop tt. 
Pentland, 7 B. & C. 219: Wells v. Hopwood, 3 B. & Ad. 21. 

In insurance policy. Hazard v. Ins. Co., 8 Pet. 557 ; De Mattos v. 
Saunders. L. R., 7 C. P. 571 ; Letchfordv. Oldham, 5 Q. R Div. 538. 

unless oooasioned by . In insurance policy. Strong v. Sun Mut. 

Ins. Co., 31 N. Y. 103. 

In statute. Lamprey v, Batchelder, 40 N. H. 522. 
In indictment. Rex v. Reader, 4 C. & P. 245. 

laces. J>f statute. Rheimer v. Maxwell, 3 Blatchf. 124. 

In statute* Roberts v. Barnes, 27 Wis. 422 ; Wood v. Davis, 12 Kans. 

575. 



STRA Y. 



339 



STRUCTURE. 



STRAY — Continued. 



STRAYING. 



STRAYS. 



STBICTF. 

STRIKE. 
STROKED. 



beast in a sufforing oondition. In statute, Sturges v. Ray- 
mond, 27 Conn. 473. 

In statute, Morris v, Jeflfries, i Q. B. 263 ; Lawrence v. King, L. R., 3 

Q. B. 345. 
Millcreek Tp. v, Brigliton Stock Yard, 27 Ohio St. 435. 

of water. In statute, Murdock v. Stickney, 8 Cush. 116. 

private . In statute, Reynolds v. Com., 93 Pa. St. 458. 

Dyer v. Chase, 52 Cal. 440 ; May v, Haynie, 50 Cal. 70 ; Coon v. Rig- 
den, 4 Col. 276. 

In statute. Queen v. Vestry, i EL, Bl. & El. 743 ; Reg. v. Turnpike 
Road, 3 El. & Bl. 1002 ; Covedale v. Charlton, 3 Q. B. Div. 376 ; 
Nutter V, Board, 4 Q. B. Div. 375 ; Le Neve «/. Mile End, 8 El. & Bl. 
1062 ; Newman v. Baker, 8 C. B. (N. S.) 205 ; Queen v. Strand Bd. of 
Wks., 4 B. & S. 548; Curtis v, Embery, L. R., 7 Ex. 369; Philadel- 
phia V. Lea, 9 Phila. 106 ; Wilson v, Alleghany City, 79 Pa. St. 272 ; 
Reed v. Ene, 79 Pa. St. 346 ; Cox v, Louisville, etc., ,R. Co., 48 Ind. 
178 ; Kelsey v. King, 33 How, Pr. 39 ; Quinn v. City of Paterson, 27 
N. J. (L.) 35 ; re Burmeister, 76 N. Y. 174. 

In will. Humphreys v, Roberts, 5 B. & Aid. 410. 

improvement. In statute, Hoboken v, Harrison, 30 N. J. (L.) 

74. 
or place. In statute. Case v. Storey, L. R., 4 Ex.. 319. 

orosB or fronting. In statute. Schumackerz/. Tobermann, 

56 CaL 510. 

new . In statute, Dryden v. Overseers, i Ex. Div. 223 ; Sheffield 

V, Board., 1 Ex. Div. 395 ; London R. Co. v. Vestry, 4 Ex. Div. 239; 
Vestry V. Barrett, L. R., 9 Q. B. 278; Sawyer v, Paddington, L. R.,6 
Q. B. 165 ; Pound v, Bd. of Wks., L. R., 7 Q. B. 183 ; Hesketh v, Bd., 
L. R., 9 Q. B. 5. 

Walker v, Caywood, 31 N. Y. 51 ; Perrin v, N. Y. Cent. R. Co., 36 N. 
Y. 1 20. 

or highways. In statute, Lehigh Valley R. Co. v, Dover R. 

Co., 43 N. J. (L.) 512. 

measure. In deed, Andrews v. Rue, 34 N. J. (L.) 402. 

settlement. Douglass z/. Congreve, 4 Bing. (N. C.) i. 

In indictment. Com. v, Gallagher, 6 Mete. 568. 

I her. Adams v, Hannon, 3 Mo. 223. 

corroborating oiroamstanoes. In statute, Russell v. Com., 3 

Bush, 469. 

or spirituous liquors or wines. In statute, Tompkins Co. v. 



Taylor, 21 N. Y. 173; Nevin v, Ladue, 3 Denio, 43; Nevin v, Ladue, 
3 Denio, 437 ; People v. Crilley, 20 Barb. 246. 

In statute, Montague v. Smith, 17 Q. B. 690. 

juries. In statute. Cook v. State, 24 N. J. (L.) 843. 

oflT. In statute, Sherwood v, Reade, 7 Hill. 439. 

In statute, Lee v. Town of Barkhamstead, 46 Conn. 213; Lothian v. 
Wood, 55 Cal. 159. 

intended to annoy. In statute, Harbison v. White, 46 Conn. 

108. 



SmUCTUJiES. 



340 



SUBSCRIPTIONS. 



BTUi}KBrr 

STUMP. 



SUBJaOT. 



STBTJCrrUBBS. /h siatuU. Stone v. SUte, 63 Ala. 117; Collins v. Drew, 6 Daly, 334. 
STUBBUi. In contract. Callahan v. Stanley, 57 Cal. 477. 

In statute. Morse v. State, 6 Conn. 9. 

Creroer v. Portland, 36 Wis. 92. 

STUXPAGX. Baker v. Whiting, 3 Sumner, 479. 

out on Mid landA. In contract. Blood v. Dmmmond, 67 Mt 

476. 

— of aotton. In statute. Scarborough v. Smith, 18 Rans. 399; 
Collier v. Irwin, 3 Montana, 142. 

— to. In mortgage. Howard v. Chase, 104 Mass. 249; Dresel v. 
Jordan, 104 Mass. 407. 

— to a mortgage. In deed. Salamon v. Wilson, 41 Cal. 595; Bel- 
mont V. Cowan, 22 N. Y. 438. 

— to law. Head v. University, 19 Wall. 526. 

— to the payment. In deed. Dingeldein v. Third Ave. R R^ 37 
N. Y. 575. 

to the payment of rent. In deed. Stewart v. Wolveridge, s M. 



BTTBiaT. 



n«it 



ft S. 83; 3 M. & 8. s6i ; Walker v. Physic. $ Pa. St 204. 

SUBJBGT-ICATTBB. In statute. Pagan v. Harrison, 4 C. B. 919 ; Borst v. Corey, iS 

N. Y. 505 ; Churchill v. Ricker, 109 Mass. 211. 

in dispute. Hunt v. Hunt, 72 N Y. 217. 

of the action. In statute. Scarborough v. Smith, 18 Kans. 399. 

SUBJECTS. In treaty. The Pizarro, 2 Wheat. 227. 
SUBMISSION. Reg. v. Day, 9 C. & P. 722. 

In statute. Shed v. Railroad, 67 Mo. 687. 

In contract. Akely v. Akely, 17 How. Pr 21 ; Caldwell % Baldwin, 43 

Ala. 617. 
them to an examination. In statute. Brouer v. Cotheal, 10 

Barb. 216. 

to or aoqniesoed in. In statute. Glover v. Coleman, L. R^ 10 

C. P. 108. 

In statute. Forsyth v. Pierson, 19 Fed. Rep. 801. 

Stone V. Marvel, 45 N. H. 481 ; Wild Cat Branch v. Ball, 4S ^nd. 213; 
Murray v. McHugh, 9 Cush. 166. 

In statute. Roberts v. Phillips, 4 El. & Bl. 450. 
SUBSCRIBED. In statute. James v. Patten, 6 N. Y. 9 ; Com. v. Barhigfat, 9 Giay, 

113; Guthrie z'. Price, 23 Ark. 397 ; Vines v, Clingforst, 21 Ark. 
312. 

Btook shall be . In statute. New York, etc., R Co. v. Hunt, 39 

Conn. 76. 

SUBSGBIBEB. In statute. Wilkinson v. Anglo Cal. Co., 18 Q. B. 728 ; Stewart r. 

Anglo Cal. Co., 18 Q. B. 737. 

SUBSCBIBEBS. In statute. Thames Tunnel Co. v. Sheldon, 6 R & C. 346 ; Gay r. 

Keys, 30 111. 413. 

SUBSGBIFTION. Nugent v. Supervisors, 19 Wall. 241 , re Downie's Will, 42 Wis. 

66 ; Woodruff v. McDonald, 33 Ark. 97. 

liat. McFariand z. Stewart, 2 Watts, iii. 

SUBSCBIPTIOFS. and oontributionB. In statute. Bxown v. Thompkios^ 49 

Md. 425. 



SUBMTT 

SXTBFGBNA. 
SUBSGBIBS 



SUBSEQUENT. 



341 



SUCCESSOR. 



SUBSTANCE. 



SUBSSQuJsnT. Sands v. Lyon, 18 Conn. 27. 

In statute. May v. Feddcrke, 43 N. Y. (S. C.) 335. 

aotion. In statute. Fear v. Castle, 8 Q. B. Div. 380. 

oreditor. Evans v. Lewis, 30 Ohio St. 11. 

insurance. In insurance policy. Jackson v. Massachusetts, etc., 

Ins. Co., 23 Pick. 418 (34 Am. Dec» 69). 

pnxohaaer. In statute. Rankin v. Miller, 43 Iowa, 10; Mc- 

Clure V. Tallman, 30 Iowa, 515. 

pniohasers. In statute. Dillingham v. Bolt, 37 N. Y. 198; 

Meech v. Patchin, 14 N. Y. 71 ; Kennedy i/. Northrup, 15 111. 148. 

tenn thereafter. In bail band. Reese v. U. S., 9 Wall. 13. 

. matters of ibr man or beast. In statute. Sledd t^. Com., 19 

Gratt. 813. 

Com. V. Borden, 61 Pa. St. 273. 

of the oflfonse. In statute. Reg. v. Overton, 4 Q. B. 88. 

of the petition. In statute. Quincy k Palmyra R.R.V. Taylor, 

43 Mo. 36. 

In . In plea. Flint v. Pike, 4 B. & C. 48a 

matter of . In statute. Brown v. State, 11 Tex. (App.) 451. 

words in as alleged. In instruction. Durrah v. Stillwell, 59 

Ind. 139. 

SITBSTAirnAIi. Brooks v. Jenkins, 3 McLean, 433. 

error. In statute. Re Cruger, 84 N. Y. 619. 

inhabitants. In statute. Donne v. Marter, 3 M . & R 98. 

householder. In statute. Reg. v. Spuwell, L. R, i Q. B. 73. 

rights ofthe adverse party. In statute. Allardz^. Lamirande, 

29 Wis. 510. 
SUSSTAJmALLY. Com. v. Wentworth, 118 Mass. 441. 

alike. Brooks v. Jenkins, 3 McLean, 432. 

as described. Seymour v. Osborne, 3 Fish. Pat Cas. 555. 

identioal. Com. v. Stone, 103 Mass. 421. 

the same. Adams v. Edwards, i Fish. Pat. Cas. i. 

SXrBSTITTJTE. In statute. Henderson v. State, 59 Ala. 91. 

In statute. Clark v. Denton, i B. & Ad. 100. 

^to. In statute. Ryhope Coal Co. v. Foyer, 7 Q. B. Div. 485. 



•^#^:^:^•JJ^• 



#iji:-iiii< 



\Qt. 



Sands v. Lyon, 18 Conn. 27. 

party. In statute. Smithbeck v. Larson, 18 Wis. 183; Nor- 



wegian, etc.. Church v, Thorson, 21 Wis. 35. 

In statute. Atty.-Gen. v. Yelverton, 7 Hurl. A N. 327 ; Atty.-Gen. v. 
Fitzjohn, 2 Hurl. & N. 473 ; Wright v. Blakeslee, 11 Otto, 175. 

SirCXXESSIVELY. Nepean v. Goddard, i B. & C. 530. 

In statute. Town of Salem v. Town of Lyme, 29 Conn. 74. 

three weeks . In order. Bachelor v. Bachelor, i Mass. 256. 

two weeks . In statute. Brewer v. Springfield, 97 Mass. 1 52. 

In constitution. State v. Leay, 64 Mo. 89. 

In statute. Atty.-Gen. v. Middleton, 3 Hurl. 8l N. 136 ; Braybrook v. 
Atty.-Gen., 9 H. L. Cas. 150: Atty.-Gen. t/. Littledale, L. R., 5 H. 
L. 290. 



SUCCESSORS. 



342 



SUFFERING. 



BV00E88OB8. 



SUOH. 



SUDDEN. 



SUE. 



SUFFER. 



SUFFERED. 



In deed. Union Canal Co. v. Young, i Whart. 410 ; Overseers v. Sears, 
22 Pick. 122 ; Congressional Soc. v. Stark, 34 Vt 243. 

and assigns. Sedgwick v. Laflin, 10 Allen, 450. 



Com. V. Miller, 3 Cush. 244 ; Whiteford v. Com, 6 Rand. 721 (18 Am. 
Dec. 771) ; U. S. v, Gooding, 12 Wheat. 477 ; Com. v. Hancock 
Free Bridge, 2 Gray, 68. 

In statute. Brown v. DeWinton, 6 C. B. 359 ; Stone v. Mayor, 2 C. 
P. Div. 99 ; Reg. v. Inhabitants, 5 B. & Ad. 227 ; 8 Q. R 875 ; Wood 
V, MjTtton, 10 Q. B. 809 ; Eastern Counties R. Co. v. Marriage, 9 
H. ll Cas. 32 ; 2 Hurl. &. N. 634; 6 Hurl. & N. (931 ; Ireland v. 
Berry, 5 Q. B. 550; Reg. v. Rose, 6 Q. B. 156; Queen v. Randall. 
4 El. it Bl. 565; King V. Inhabitants, 2 B. & C. 224; Doe v. 
Hodgson, 12 Ad. & Ell 137 ; Ogden v, Glidden, 9 Wis. $2 ; State v. 
Beasley, 5 Mo. 92. 

In will. Doe v, Alchin, 2 B. & Aid. 124. 

bastard. In statute. Sullivan v. State, 36 Ark. 66. 

oompany. In statute. Ins. Co. v. Fitzgerald, 16 Q. B. 457. 

deed. In statute. Lloyd v. Harrison, 6 B. & S. 91. 

dismissal. In statute. Skuse v. Davis, 10 Ad. &. EIL 638. 

election* In statute. Kemp v. Holland, 10 Mo. 255. 

heiis. Valentine v» Borden, 100 Mass. 280. 

house or other building. In statute. Summerman v. Knowles, 

33 N. J. (L.) 204. 

list. In statute. King v. Burrill, 12 Ad. & Ell. 460. 

prosecution. In statute. Queen v. Lee, i Q. B. Div. 198. 

term. In statute. Evans v. Com., 3 Mete 455. 

ivarrant of attorney. /« statute. Morris v. Mellen, 6 R & C 



454. 
any- 



— person. In statute. U. S. v. Taylor, i Hughes, 519L 

and unexpected death. In will. Skipwith v. Cabell, 19 GiatL 

758. 
In statute. Guthrie v. Fisk, 3 B. & C. 184; Challenor v. Niles, 78 

111. 78. 

may and be sued. In statute. Fatchall v. St Louis.' etc, 28 

Mo. 178 ; Mooney v. Hannibal, etc., R. R. Co., 28 Mo. 570. 

to and be sued. In charter. Freeholders v. Strader, 3 Harr. 

(N. J.) 530 (35 Am. Dec. 530). 

to labor and traveL In insurance policy. Alexander v. Sun 

Mut. Ins. Co.. 51 N. Y. 253. 

In statute. Selleck v. Selleck, 19 Conn. 504 ; Collinsville ^. Scanland, 
58 111. 221 ; Campbell v. Traders' Bk., 2 Biss. 423. 

any act In deed. Roffey v. Bent, L. R., 3 Eq. Cas. 758. 

to be opened any letters. In statute. Meirelles v. Banning, 

2 B. & Ad. 909. 



oauseor 



— . In statute. Hipkins v. Birmingham Gas. Co., 5 Hurl. 

& N. 75 ; 6 Hud. & N. 250. « 

— or permitted. In statute. Gregory v. U. S,, 17 Blatchf. 327. 
to go at large. In statute. Com. v. Fourteen Hogs, 10 S. & 



SUFFERING. 



R. 393. 

Bovee v. Danville, 53 Vt. 191. 



SUFFERS. 



343 



SUIT. 



SUFFERS. 



SUFFS 



»ji:hi 



any gaming. In statute. Bosley v, Davies» i Q. B. Div. 84 ; 

Redgate v. Haynes, i Q. B. Div. 89. 

Com. V, Lawless, 103 Mass. 431 ; Lyman z/. Inhabitants, 107 Mass. 
339; Com. V, Intoxicating Liquors, 105 Mass. 179; Parker v. Over- 
man, 18 How. 137; Myers v, Springfield, 112 Mass. 491 ; Lyman v. 
Gipson, 18 Pick. 426. 

ability. In statute. Templeton v, Stratton, 128 Mass. 137 ; New- 



SUGAR 



SUICIDE. 



SUIT. 



ton V, Feeley, 130 Mass. 12. 

distreBS. Intrant, Van Rensselaer v. Snyder, 13 N. Y. 299. 

In statute. Re Arnison, L. R., 3 Ex. 56. 

evidenoe. In statute, Bevan v. Gething, 3 Q. B. 740. 

reason. In statute, Hoge v, Richmond, etc., R. Co., 3 Otto, 93. 

Beomity. In plea, Hayne v, Rhodes, 8 Q. B. 347. 

good and condition and repair. In statute. Stuart v. Super- 
visors, 83 111. 341. 

SUFFOCATION. In bill 0/ lading, Leuw v. Dudgeon, L. R., 3 C. P. 17 ; Sturgeon v, 

St Louis, etc., R. Co., 6$ Mo. 569. 

In statute. U. S. v. 112 Casks, 8 Peters, 477; Barlow v. U. S., 7 
Peters, 404. 

green In statute. Belcher v, Linn, 24 How. 508. 

loaf . In statute, U. S. t'. Breed, i Sumner, 159. 

refined . In statute. Barlow v. U. S., 7 Pet. 404 ; U. S. v. 85 

Hc^sheads, 2 Paine, 54. 

die by . In insurance policy. Gay v. Union Mut. Ins. Co., 9 

Blatchf. 157; Eastabrook v. Union Mut. Ins. Co., 54 Me. 224; 
Dean v. American Mut. Ins. Co., 4 Allen, 96; Breasted v. Farmers' 
Loan, etc., Co., 4 Hill, 73; 8 N. Y. 299 ; John Hancock Mut. Life 
Ins. Co. V, Moore, 34 Mich. 42. 

shall oommit . In insurance policy. Clift v. Schwabe, 3 C. B. 

446. 

In insurance policy. Harris v. Phcenix Ins. Co., 35 Conn. 310. 

In statute. Cohens v. Viiginia, 6 Wheat. 264 ; Clinkenbeard v. U. S., 
21 Wall. 65 ; First Nat. Bank v. Turnball, 16 Wall. 190; Weston v, 
Charleston, 2 Pet. 449; West v, Aurora City, 6 Wall. 139; Gwin v, 
Breedlove, 2 How. 29; Dunn v. Clark, 8 Pet. i ; Huff z/. Hutchinson, 
14 How. 586 ; Freeman v. Have, 24 How. 451 ; Williams v, Byrne, 
Hempst. 472 ; Railway Co.'s v. Chamberlain, 6 Wall. 748; Christmas 
V. Russell, 14 Wall. 69 ; Kohl v. U. S., i Otto, 367 ; State v. Pahl. 
I Hawks, 442 (9 Am. Dec. 65s) ; Holmes v. Jennison, 14 Pet. 
640; re Acyinea, i Sandf. 690; Wilt v. Stickney, 15 Bank. Reg. 23; 
Overseers v. Beedle, i Barb. 1 1 ; Calderwood v. Calderwood, 38 Vt. 
171; Gurnee z'. County of Brunswick, i Hughes, 270; McBane t/. 
People. 50 111. 503 ; Hendrix v. Kellogg, 32 Ga. 435 ; Barney v. 
Globe Bk., 5 Blatchf. 107. 

, controversy, matter or cause depending. In statute. U. S. 

V, Reese, 4 Sawy. 634. 

for the purpose of restraining the assessment or collection 

of any tax. In statute. Wells v. Cent. Vt. R. Co., 14 Blatchf. 427. 

of a civil nature at law. Woodruff v. Woodruff, 3 N. J. (L.) 41 3, 

or action. In insurance policy, Riddlesberger v, Ins. Co., 7 

Wall. 386. 



SUIT. 



344 



SUMMONED, 



SUITABIiB. 



SUIT— Continued. 

or other jirooeedlng. In statute. Holme v. Gay, 5 Ch. Div. 901. 

or prooeedlng for dower. In statute. Farmer v. Ray, 42 Ala. 

125. 
or proeeoatio]i« Com. v. Casey, 12 Allen, 217. 

to reooTor the oontents of any ohoee in action. In siaittu, 

Sheldon v. Sill, 8 How. 441. 

any . In statute, Trecothick v, Austin, 4 Mason, 23. 

any for neoooaarloo fomiahed. In statute. Brown v. West, 

73 Me. 23, 

Com. V. Intoxicating Liquors, 105 Mass. 179. 

In will. Bainbridge's Appeal, 97 Pa. St 485. 

bridges. In statute. Mayor v. Comm'rs, 113 Mass. 161. 

fonoes. In statute. Eames v. Salem, etc., R. Co., 98 Mass. 560. 

^ person. In statute. State v. Taylor, 6 Mo. (App.) 281 ; Peters v. 
Public Administrator, i Bradf. 200. 

— for publio representation. In statute. Martenetti v, Maguire, 
I Abb. (U. S.) 360. 

— and proceedings. In statute. Ross v. Julian, 70 Mo. 209. 
^ arising under the oonstitution and laws of the United State. 
In statute. Railroad Co. v. Mississippi, 12 Otto, 135. 

— at oommon law. In constitution. Parsons v. Bedford, 3 Pet 433. 

— at law. In statute. Haven t^. Hilliard, 23 Pick. 10. 

— oonoeming real estate or whereby the same may be aflbctad. 

In statute. Ensworth v. Holly, 33 Mo. 370. 

— for penalties and forfeitures. In statute. U. S. v. Mann, i 
Gall, 177. 

of a oiyil nature in oommon law or in equity. In statMtt. 



SUITED. 



BUTTS. 



BUM. 



Gaines v. Fuentis, 2 Otto, 10 ; Kohl v. U. S., i Otto, 367. 

actions and pending. In statute. Davis v. Livingston, 6 Ohio, 

225. 

in good leather such as . In note. Bailey v. Simonds, 6 K. H. 

159 (2$ Am. Dec. 455). 

U. S. V. Van Auken, 96 U. S. 368. 

in dispute. In statute. The Generous, L. R., 2 Adm. & Ecc 57 

demanded. In constitution. State v. Porter, 69 N. C. 140 ; 

State V. Rosseau, 71 N. C. 194; Hedgcockz/. Davis, 64 N. 0.650; 
Morris v. Saunders, 85 N. C. 140. 

inoontroversy. In statute. Kline v. Wood, 9 S. ft R. 301. 

of money. In statute. Pruessing v. Ing, 4 B. & Aid. 204. 

recovered. In statute. Johnson v. Harris, 1 5 C. B. 358. 

BUKMABILY. recoverable . In statute. Queen v. Pratt, L. R., 5 Q. R 178. 

BUMMABT. application in the action after judgment. In statute. Ernst 

V. The Brooklyn, 24 Wis. 616. 

exerdse of jurisdiction by justices. In statute. Sweetman v. 

Guest, L. R., 3 Q. B. 263. 
of the mountain. Beale v, Patterson, 3 W. & S. 379. 



SUMMIT. — 

SUMMONED. In statute. Hendrix 7/. Fuller, 7 Kans. 331 ; Woodruflf v. Barney, i 

Bond, 531. 
In writ. Abell v. Simon, 49 Md. 318. 



SUMMONS. 345 SUPPORT. 

SUXMOFS. In statute, Towne v. Steam Co., 5 C. B. (N. S.) 730; re Meador, i. 

Abb. (U. S.) 337 ; Black v, Clendening, 3 Montana, 44. 

, notioe or adTertisement. In statute. Re Miller, 39 Cal. 550. 

SUMS. not exceeding five doUan. In statute. Boatmen's Sav. Inst. 

V, Bank of Missouri, 33 Mo. 497. 

of money. In statute, Gardner v, R. Co., L. R., 2 Ch. App. 201. 

of money owing to me. In will, Martin v. Hobson, L. R., 8 

Ch. App. 401. 

SUNDAY. Kilgour v. Miles, 6 Gill & J. 268 ; Huidekoper v. Cotton, 3 Watts, 56. 

In iteUute, State v. Green, 37 Mo. 466. 

SUKDBY. pieoes of silver ooin* In indi^ment, U. S. v, Kurtz, 4 Cranch 

C. C. 674. 

8UNBISB. Tutton e. Drake, 5 Horl. & N. 648; Nixon v. Freeman, 5 Hurl. & N. 

633- 
SUNSET. Tutton v, Drake, 5 Hurl. & N. 648 ; Nixon v. Freeman, 5 Hurl. & N. 

653. 

SUFEBANNUATION. In statute, Hobson v. Mayor, 4 El. & Bl. 990. 

SUFBBilNE. In contract, Adams v, Rogers, 9 Watts, 121. 

SUFEBFLUOUS. lands. In statute. May v, R. Co., L. R., 8 Q. B. 27 ; Direc- 
tors V, Blackmore, L. R., 4 H. L. 610; Directors v. May, L. R., 7 H. 
L. 283. 

SUPEBINTENX). In statute, Youngmuth v, Jewell, 15 Nev. 45. 

the police of the town. In statute. Com. v, Martin, 98 

Mass. 4. 
the progreM. In contract, Peterson v, Rawson, 34 N. Y. 371. 



8UPEBINTENDENTS. of repairs. In statute. People v, Benton, 27 N. Y. 387. 

8UPEBIOB. oourt. Re Fernandes, 6 Hurl. & N. 718 ; Busteed v. Parsons, S4 

Ala. 393. 

SUPERSEDED. Ex parte Hall, i Pick. 261. 

SUPEBSTinOUS. nse. Methodist Church v. Remington, i Watts, 224. 

SUPERVISION, general over the health of the oity. In city ordinance. 

Aull V, Lexington, 18 Mo. 401. 

SUPERVISORS. People v. Supervisors, 8 Cal. 62. 

SUPPIJED. goods . In guaranty. Hood v, Grace, 7 Hurl. & N. 497. 

SUPFIJES. In statute, Str. Gen. Brady v, Buckley, 6 Mo. 558 ; Bryan v. Str. 

Pride of the West, 12 Mo. 371 ; Bailey v. Str. Concordia, 17 Mo. 357; 
Farmers' Loan, etc., Co. v. Mayor, 4 Bosw. 80 ; Kollock v. Parchor, 
52 Wis. 393. 

SUPPIiT, In statute. Rex v, Heffeman, i Jebb, 4 ; Com. v. Davis, 12 Bush, 240 

In order. Grant v, Dabney, 19 Kas. 390. 

In statute, Eskridge v, Ditmars, 51 Ala. 254. 

In will, Addison v. Bowie, 2 Bland, 606; Tolley v. Green, 2 Sandf. 

Ch. 91 ; Thompson v, Carmichael, 3 Sandf. Ch. 120. 
and eduoation. In will, Williams v, McDougall, 39 Cal. 80. 

and maintenanoe. In statute, Reg. v, Gravesend, 5 El. & Bl. 

460. 

and take oare of. In contract. Bull v, McCrea, 8 B. Mon. 422. 

good amd oomlbrtable and maintenanoe. In will, Conant 

V, Stratton, 107 Mass. 474. 
44 



SUPPORT. 



346 



SURVIVOR^ 



6UPFOBT — Continued. 

personal 



231. 
their 



6XJFFOBTS. 



— and oomfbrt. In wiil, Lancaster v. Dolan, i Rawle, 

In guaranty. Grant v, Dabney, 19 Kas. 388. 

In statute. Abbott v. Walcott, 38 Vt 666. 

Scudding v. Eyles, 9 Q. B. 860. 

In instruction. Parker v. Enslow, 102 III. 277. 

to have been fbrftited. In statute. Fisher v. Hamden, i 

Paine, 60. 

SUPPOSITION, flhir and reasonable of right. In statute. White v. Feast. 

L. R., 7 Q. B. 353. 
Smith V, Sheldon, 35 Mich. 42. 

In note. Dart v, Sherwood, 7 Wis. 524 ; Griffith v. Reed, 21 Weod. 
$02 (34 Am. Dec. 267) ; Sisson v. Barrett, 2 N. Y. 406. 



SUBPACm. 



8UBPAGING. 
SUBPLIT9. 



SUBPBISE. 



SUJbtVlVK 



flUKViVLNG. 



SUJblVlVOB. 



In statute. Batchellor v. Lawrence, 9 C. B. (N. S.) S54- 

damage. In statute. AUoway v, WagstafF, 4 Hurl. & N. 308; 

4 Hurl. & N. 689. 

of the adjoining lots. In statute. Burkhardt v. Hanlej, 23 

Ohio St 558. 

water. Jones v. Hannoran, 55 Mo. 462. 



In contract. Snell v. Cottingharo, 72 III. 161. 

In will. Allen's Ezrs. v. Allen. 18 How. 385 ; Coates' Appeal, 2 Pa. St 
133 ; Pennocks' Estate, 20 Pa, St. 268 ; Mayor v. Atty.-Gen., 5 H. L 

Cas. I ; Page v. Leafingwell, 18 Ves. 466. 

earnings. In statute. People v. Comrs,, 76 N. Y. 64. 

accident^ mistake or fraud without fteolt on his part h 

statute. Blood v, Beadle, 65 Ala. 102 ; Brock v. R Co., 65 Ala. 79. 

Alexanders. Greenup, i Munf. 134 (4 Am. Dec. 541). 

In insurance policy. May v. Buckeye Ins. Co., 25 Wis. 291 ; Denny r. 
Conway Stock. Ins. Co., 13 Gray, 492. 

In statute, Atty.-Gen. v. Stevens, i Sazt. (Ch.) 369 (22 Am. Dec 526). 

In will, Worcester v. Worcester, loi Mass. 128 ; Cross v, Maltby, L 
R., 20 Eq. Cas. 378 ; Gee v, Liddell, L. R., 2 Eq. Cas. 341 ; re Palmer, 
L. R., 19 Eq. Cas. 320. 

not . In will. Reed v. Braithwaite, L. R., 11 Eq. Cas. 51$. 

In will. Lucius v. Lucius, 7 Ch. Div. 255; Hurry v, Morgan, L R» 
3 Eq. Cas. 152. 

brothers or sisters. In will. Howard v, Collins, L. R., $ £q> 

Cas. 349. 

ohild or children. In will. Re Walker, 12 Ch. Div. 205; 



White V. Hight 12 Ch. Div. 751. 

children. In will. Long v, Prigg, 8 B. & C. 233. 

lawful descendants. In will, Blatchford v, Newberry, 99 IlL 14- 

In will. Waite v, Littlewood, L. R., 8 Ch. (App.) 71 ; Wake v. Varah, J 
Ch. Div. 349; Cross v, Maltby, L. R., 20 Eq. Cas. 378 ; Gee v, lid- 
dell, L. R., 2 Eq. Cas, 341 ; re Palmer, L. R., 19 Eq. Cas. 32o;Taaffc 
V, Conmee, 10 H. L. Cas. 64 ; Duryea v, Duryea, 85 III. 41 ; Abbott 
V, Essex, 18 How. 202 ; Suiton v. Boyd, 19 Ohio St. 30 (2 Am. Rep. 

369). 
of the trustees. In will. Sharp v. Sharp, 2 B. ft Aid. 415. 



SURVIVOR. 



347 



TAKE. 



SUBVTVOB — Continued. 

or his assigns. In deed. Peck v, Ingraham, 28 Miss. 246. 

or survivors. In will, Guernsey v. Guernsey, 36 N. Y. 267 ; 

Davidson v. Kimpten, 18 Ch. Div. 213; Pomfret v, Graham, 19 Ch. 
Div. 186. 

8UKV1VOBS. In will. Best v. Coram., 10 Bush, 36 ; Nickoll v. Nickoll, 99 III. 523. 

SUBVIVOBSHIP. Pain v. Benson, 3 Atk. 80. 

benefit of . In will. Corneck v. Wadman, L. R., 7 Eq. Cas. 80. 



SUSPECT. 

SUSPEND. 

SUSPENDED. 

SUSPENSION. 

SWAMP. 



Com. V. Lottery Tickets, 5 Gush. 374. 

payment. Re Wolf, 4 Sawyer, 168. 

Ford V. Beech, 11 Q. B. 852. 

of payment. In statute. Phillips v. Surridge, 9 C. B. 739. 

and overflowed lands. In statute. Thompson v. Thornton, 50 



SWEAB. 



SWEAJUNG. 



Cal. 142. 

land. Keller v. Brickey, 3 Cent. L. J. 457. 

Dean . In survey. Felder v. Bonnett, 2 McMull. (L.) 44 (37 Am. 

Dec. 545). 

in and by a written statement. In indictment. Com. v. Casel, 



105 Mass. 584. 
fiJse . Langford v. State, 9 Tex. (App.) 285. 



SWEEPSTAKES. In statute. AUport v. Nutt, i C. B. 980. 

SWINDIiEB. Forrest v. Hanson, i Cranch C. C. 64. 

In libel. Fanson v. Stuart, i T. R. 748 ; 2 Sm. L. C. 79 ; Odiorne v. 
Bacon, 6 Cush. 185 ; Weil v. Attenhoften, 26 Wis. 710; Herr v. Bam- 
berg, 10 How. Pr. 128; Stevenson v. Hayden, 2 Mass. 406. 

SWINDLING. Hall v. Rogers, 2 Blackf. 429; Wyatt v. Ayres. 2 Port. 157 ; Bozier v. 

State, 5 Tex, (App.) 220; Matthews v. State, 10 Tex. (App.) 279; 
Popinaux v. State, 12 Tex. (App.) 140. 

In statute. Gibson v. Jenney, 15 Mass. 205. 

In statute. Carson v. R. Co., 35 Cal, 325 ; Rivers v. State, 10 Tex. 
(App.) 177. . 

a lie. In libel. Knight v. Sharp, 24 Ark. 603. 

appraisers. In statute. Roden v. Eyton, 6 C. R 427. 

to. Com. V. Bennett, 7 Allen, 534. 

duly . In statute. Bowman v. Van Kuren, 29 Wis. 209. 



SWINE. 
SWITCH 

BWOBE. 
SWOBN. 



SITMPATHY 



TAJTW. 



In constitution. State v. Woodson, 41 Mo. 227. 

Mobile R. Co. v. Whitney, 39 Ala. 468. 

In statute. U. S. v. One hundred and twelve Casks, 8 Pet. 277. 

In statute. State v. Peck, 24 Wis. 488. 

of town government. In statute. Ex parte Wall, 48 Cal. 279. 

for gaming. In statute. Miller v. State, 48 Ala. 123. 

of like kind. In statute. Nuckolls v. Com., 22 Alb. L. J. 163. 

billiard . In statute. State v. Price, 12 Gill & J. 260 (37 Am. 

Dec. 81), 

Cocker v. Musgrove, 9 Q. B. 223. 

In contract. Norton v. Woodruff, 4 N. Y. 153; Buffalo & N. Y. R. R. 
V. Dudley, 14 N. Y. 336. 

In plea. King v. Kent, 29 Ala. 542. 

In statute. Jackson v. Brown, 5 Wend. 590. 



TAKE. 



348 



TARE. 



— Continued. 



TAKING. 



TAIiE. 
TAJJIiAGE. 
TAPEBING. 
TABE. 



and oarry away. In statute. Rex v, Walsh, i Moody, 14. 



— and nil the number of ■harei. In contract. Bangor Bridge Co. 
V. McMahon, 10 Me. 478. 

— oharge of and proyide Ibr suoh intozioated pezecm. In stat- 
ute, Sansom v, Greenough, 55 Iowa, 45. 

— Ibr any ftuudulent pnrpoee. In statute. Queen v. Bailey, L 



R., I C. C. R. 347. 

— him. In contract. Lively v. Robbins, 39 Ala. 461. 

— or kill any ooney. In statute. Rex v. Glover, i Russ. & R j. 27a 

— private property. In constitution. Railroad Co. v, Richmond, 
6 Otto, 521. 

up any oow running at large. In city ordinance. 



Jaquith v. 



Royce, 42 Iowa, 406. 

demand and . Stamp v. Sweetland, 8 Q. B. 23. 

In constitution, Bradley z^. N. Y., etc., R. Co., 21 Conn. 394 ; Fire Depart- 
ment V, Noble, 3 E. D. Smith, 440 ; Canal Appraisers v. People, 17 
Wend. 571 ; Chandler v, Jamaica Pond Aq. Co., 114 Mass. 575; Com. 
V, Tewksbury, 11 Mete. 55 ; Evansville, etc., R. Co. v, Dick, 9 Ind. 
433 ; Wabash, etc.. Canal Co. v. Spears, 16 Ind. 441 ; Cash v. Whit- 
worth, 13 La. Ann. 401 ; People v, Laurence, 36 Barb. 177; Howell 
V. City of Buffalo, 37 N. Y. 267 ; Creighton v. Manson, 27 Cal. 613; 
Den V, Hoboken Land Co., 18 How. 273. 

In statute, Wharton v, Naylor, 12 Q. B. 675; Carter z^. Clark, 28 Conn. 

S25. 

for publio use. In constitution, Waterbury River Turnpike 

Co. V, Litchfield, 26 Conn. 211 ; Imlay v. Union Branch R. Co^ 26 
Conn. 254; Hooker t/. New Haven R. Co., 14 Conn. 146; Nichols v. 
City of Bridgeport, 23 Conn. 187 ; Morris & Essex R. Co. v, Newark, 
10 N. J. (Eq.) 352 ; Glover v, Powell, 10 N. J. (Eq.) 211; Williams v. 
New York Cent. R. Co., 16 N. Y. 97 ; re Hamilton Avenue, 14 Barb. 
40^; Canal Appraisers v. People, 17 Wend. 571 ; Sabin v, Vermont 
Cent. R. Co., 25 Vt. 363; Richardson v, Vermont Cent R. Co., 25 
Vt. 465 ; Alexander v. City of Milwaukee, 16 Wis. 247 ; Surocco v, 
Geary, 3 Cal. 69; Cushman v. Smith, 34 Me. 247 ; Nichols v, Somer- 
set, etc., R. Co., 43 Me. 356; Bonaparte v, Camden, etc., R. Co., 
Baldw. 205 ; Polly v, Saratoga, etc., R. Co.. 9 Barb. 449 ; Case of the 
Philadelphia R. Co., 6 Whart. 25 (36 Am. Dec. 203) ; Rigney v. City 
of Chicago, 102 111. 65. 

into possession or oostody* In insurance policy. Smith v, Ins. 

Co., 89 Pa. St. 289. 

on board. In contract. Cooke v, Wilson, i C. B. (N. S.) 162, 

shall be out of the State. In contract, Newell v, O'Hara, i 

Hill(S. C.) 150. 

In statute, Dwight Printing Co. «/. Boston, 122 Mass. 583; State v. 
Fenn, 41 Conn. 591 ; Bridger v, Richardson, 8 B. & C. $68 ; Queen 
V, McGrath, L. R., i C. C. R 210; Merritt v. Carpenter, 3 Abb. App. 
Dec. 285 ; People v, Parshall, 6 Park. C. C. 129. 

male. In wiil, Trevor v. Trevor, i H. L. Cas. 239. 

Queen v. Inhabitants, 2 El. k El. 547. 

brush. Rex v, Metcalf. 2 Stark. N. P. 249. 

In statute, Napier v, Barney, 5 Blatchf. 191. 



TA VERN. 



349 



TAXES. 



TAVBEN. 



TFAXABUB. 



TAJCATION. 



In insurance policy, Rafferty v. New Brunswick Ins. Co., i8 N. J. 
(L.) 480 (38 Am. Dec. 525). 

In stcUute, City of St. Louis v, Siegrist, 46 Mo. 592 ; Hall v. State, 4 
Harr. (Del.) 132; Overseers v. Warner, 3 Hill, 150; State v. Cham- 
blyss, Cheves (L.) 230 (34 Am. Dec. 593) ; Gray v. Com., 9 Dana, 300 
(35 Am. Dec. 216). 

keeper. Ra£ferty 7/. New Brunswick Ins. Co., 18 N. J. (L.) 480 

(38 Am. Dec. 525). 

or hoiiBe of entertainment. In statute. Bonner v. Wellburn, 

7 Ga. 296. 

People V, Seymour, 16 Cal. 332 ; Perry v, Washburn, 20 Cal. 318 ; Pacific 
R. R. V, Maguire, 20 Wall. 36 ; Loan Assn. v. Topeka, 3o Wall. 655 ; 
U. S. V. Railroad, 17 Wall. 322; Mitchell v. Williams, 27 Ind. 62 ; 
Camden v, Allen, 26 N. J. (L.) 398 ; Henry z/. State, 26 Ark. 523 ; 
Anderson v. Doll, 27 Cal. 607 ; Chambers v, Satterlee, 40 Cal. 497 ; 
Williams 7/. Corcoran, 46 Cal. 553 ; re Mayor of New York, 11 Johns. 
77 ; Sharp 7/. Spier, 4 Hill, 76 ; Sharp v, Johnson, 4 Hill, 92 ; Longmore 
Tiernan, 3 Pittsb. 62 ; Barney v. Mayor, 21 La. Ann. 51 ; Curtis v. 
Pierce, 115 'Mass. 186; Blake z/. Baker, 115 Mass. 188; Pleasant t^. 
Kost, 29 111. 490 ; Amenia v. Stanford, 6 Johns. 92 ; Queen v. Inhabit- 
ants, 2 El. & El. 547* 

In constitution. People v. Supervisors, 8 N. Y. 317; City of Leaven- 
worth V, Booth, 1$ Kans. 627; Peay v. Little Rock, 32 Ark. 31; 
People V, McCreery, 34 Cal. 432 ; People v, Naglee, i CaL 232 ; City 
V, Stearns, 51 Cal. 494; Whiting v, Quackenbush, 54 Cal. 306; 
Henry v. State, 26 Ark. 523; Hale v. City of Kenosha, 29 Wis. 599. 

In statute. City of Bridgeport v. New York, etc., R. Co., 36 Conn. 
255; Doyle V, Austin, 47 Cal. 354. 

impost, assesBment or mnnioipal fine. In constitution, Wearne 

V. Haynes, 13 Nev. 103. 

or assessment. In statute. Craft v. Smith, 6 Vroom, 302. 

or dharge* In statute, ' Re Ah Fong, 3 Sawyer,' 145. 

upon property. In constitution, Straub v, Lohman, 27 Ark. 



625. 



costs. In order, Nichols v, Rensselaer County Ins. Co., 22 



Wend. 125. 

— property. City of Buffalo v, Le Couteuz, 15 N. Y. 451. 



In statute, Stephens v, Schopl District, 6 Oregon, 353. 

Boston Seaman's Friend Soc. v. Aldermen, 116 Mass. 181 ; Worcester 
Agricultural Soc. v, Worcester, 116 Mass. 189; Worcester Co. v, 
Worcester, 116 Mass. 193; United States v, R. Co., 17 Wall. 322; 
Bank of Cleveland v. lola, 9 Kans. 689 ; Loan Assn. v, Topeka, 20 
Wall. 655 ; Grim v, Weissenberg Dist., 57 Pa. St. 433 ; People v. 
Mayor, 4 N. Y. 419; Exchange Bank v, Hines, 3 Ohio St. 1. 

In constitution. Fire Department v, Helfenstein, 16 Wis. 136; Emery 
V, Gas Co., 28 Cal. 345 ; Chambers v, Satterlee, 40 Cal. 497 ; Allen v, 
Galveston, 51 Tex. 302. 

rule of . In statute. Bond v. City of Kenosha, 17 Wis. 284. 

by any law of the State. In statute. Re Mayor of New York, 

1 1 Johns. 77. 

Green v. Craft, 28 Miss. 70 ; Opinion of Justices, 58 Me. 590 ; Hanson 
V, Vernon, 27 Iowa, 28; McPhelomy v. Solomon, 15 Ind. 189; Pierce 
V, City of Boston, 3 Mete. 520; Hibb^rd v, Clark, 56 N. H. 155. 



TAXES. 



350 



TENANT. 



— Continued. 

In constitution, McGee v, Mathis, 21 Ark. 41 ; Bank of Cape Fear v. 
Deming, 7 Ired. (L.) 55 ; People v, Chenango, 8 N. Y. 317. 

In statute, Mitchell v, Fordham, 6 B. & C. 276. 

and aasessmentB. In deed, Jeffrey v, Neale, L. R., 6 C. P. 240. 

ftnd other publio dues in any manner aooming. In lease. 

Boiling z/. Stokes, 2 Leigh, 178 (21 Am. Dec. 606). 

for that year. In statute, Allis v, Jefferson Co., 34 Ark. 307. 

upon a stallion. In contract. Anderson v. Doll, 27 Cal. 607. 

ordinary and yearly . In deed. Gamer v. Hannah, 6 Duer, 262. 

parliamentary . In lease. Governor Christ's Hospital v. Harrold, 

2 Man. & G. 715. 

In plea. Whiting?/. Town of Porter, 2 Fed. Rep. 517. 

TEA-KBTTLE. and lamp with its appurtenanoes. In will. Hunt v, Berkley, 

Moseley Ch. 48. 

CTAM. In contract, Ganson v. Madigan, i $ Wis. 145 ; Duke of Marlborough 

V, Osborn, 5 B. & S. €rj. 

In statute, Wilcox v, Hawley, 31 N. Y. 648; Hotchkiss v. Hoy. 41 
Conn. 569 ; Elliott v, Lisbon, 57 N. H. 27 ; Conway v. Jefferson, 46 
N. H. 454 ; Becker v, Becker, 47 Barb. 497 ; Morse v. Keyes, 6 How. 
Pr. 18; Brown v. Davis, 16 N. Y. (S. C.) 43; Wheeler v, Crospy, S 
How. Pr, 288 ; Lockwood v, Younglove, 27 Barb. 505 ; Hoyt v. Van 
Alstyne, 15 Barb. 568; Eastman v, Caswell, 8 How. Pr. 75; Hart- 
house V, Rikers, i Duer, 606. 

— work« In contract, Duke of Marlborough v, Osborn, 5 B. & S. 
67. 
n statute. Hickok v, Thayer, 49 Vt. 372. 

neoessary . In statute. Wheeler v. Cropsey, 5 How. Pr. 288. 

TBAH8TEB. 

TEACHER 

TEABING. 



TECHNICAL 
TEIiEaBAM. 



In statute. Brusie v, Griffith, 34 Cal. 302. 

of common sohools. Trustees v. Simpson, 11 Ind. 520. 

In statute. Price v. Powell, 3 Hurl. A N. 350; Doe v. Perks, 3 R A 
Aid. 492. 

mortgage. Harrison v. Annapolis, etc., R. Co., 50 Md. 510. 



Attorney-General v. Edison Telephone Co., 43 L. T. (N. S.) 697. 

TEIiEQRAPH. Attorney-General v. Edison Telephone Co., 43 L. T. (N. S.) 697; 

O'Reilly V. Moore, 15 How. 134. 

TELLER Mussey v. Eagle Bank, 9 Mete. 306. 

aooldents by Are and . In lease. Thistle v. Union Forwarding 



Co., 29 U. C. C. P. 76. 
TEMPOR A RTTiY. In statute. State v. Strauss, 49 Md. 294. 



TEN. 
TENANC7. 

TENAKT. 



days' notioe. In statute. King v. Fisher, 4 B. & Ad. 685. 

by the curtesy. Jackson v. Johnson, 5 Cow. 74 (is Am. Dec 

433). 
Hosford V, Ballard, 39 N. Y. 147 ; Sparkcr v. Cook, 16 N. Y. 567 ; 
White V. Maynard, in Mass. 250; Queen v. Lynn, 8 Ad, & Ell. 379. 

In statute. Irvine v. Adler, 44 Cal. 559; Brooks v. Hyde, 37 Cal. 366; 
Clark V. Bury St. Edmunds, i C. B. (N. S.) 32 ; Birks v. Allison, 13 
C. B. (N. S.) i8 ; Wyatt v, Byron, i C. B. 625. 

for life. In will, Johnson v. Foulds, L. R., 5 Eq. Cas. 274. 



TENANT. 



351 



TERM. 



TENANT^ Continued. 

in fee simple of rents. In statute, Prescott v, Boucher, 3 B. 

& Ad. 859. 

in possession. In statute, Harris v, Reynolds, 13 Cal. 514. 

In statute, Rogers v, Harvey, 5 C. B. (N. S.) 1 5. 

in oonunon. Ponder v. Shea, 32 Ark. 436. 



TENANTS. 



TENDER. 



TENDBBING. 
TENEMENT. 



:-<;.i:4, 



ITBE. 



T. 



Hunter v, Warner, i Wis. 141 ; Bakeman v. Pooler, 15 Wend. 637; 
Smith V, Lewis, 26 Conn. no. 

In constitution, Bailey v. Gentry, i Mo. 165. 

In statute. Bishop v. Smedley, 2 C. B. 94. 

I{eg. V. Inhabitants, 5 Q. B. 489. 

In deed, Bullen v. Runnels, 2 N. H. 255 (9 Am. Dec. 55); Den v. 
Woodson, I Hayw. (N. C.) 24; People v, Kelsey, 14 Abb. Pr. 372. 

In statute. Dodds v, Thompson, L. R., i C. P. 133; Wadmorez/. Dear» 
L. R, 7 C. P. 212 ; King v. Inhabitants, i B. & C. 580; 4 B. & Ad. 
710; Fredericks v. Howie, i H. & C. 386 ; Com. v. Dam, 107 Mass. 
210 ; Com. V. Ackland, 107 Mass. 211 ; Com. v. Cogan, 107 Mass. 212; 
Chawner v, Cummins, 8 Q. B. 311; Water- Works Co. v. Mile End» 
17 Q. B. 520; Colebroke v. Tickell, 4 Ad. &E11. 917; King v. Barker, 
6 Ad. & Ell. 390; Queen v. Inhabitants, 4 B. & S. 97 ; King v. Mosley> 
2 B. & C. 227 ; Sackett v. Wheaton, 17 Pick. 103; Young v. Boston^ 
104 Mass. 95. 

block. In insurance Micy, Harrington v. Fitch burg Ins. Co., 

124 Mass. 126. 

house. In deed, Musgrave v. Sherwood, 54 How. Pr. 338. 

disorderly . In indictment. Com. v. Wise, 110 Mass. 181. 

other . In statute, Reg. v. Nevill, 8 Q. B. 462. 

house or other . In statute, Fredericks v. Howie, i H. & C. 384. 

In deed. Cornish v. Cleiife, 3 H. & C. 450. 

In statute. Lyndon v. Stanbridge, 2 Hurl. & N. 52 ; Barr v. Burford, 
6 Blackf. 335 (38 Am. Dec. 146); King v. Manchester Water Works, 
I B. & C, 632. 

In will. Wright v. Denn, 10 Wheat. 204. 

In indictment. Com. v. Wright, i Cush. 65 ; State v. Atkins, i Blackf. 
458 ; People v. Warner, 5 Wend. 271 ; Com. v. Stevens, i Mass. 203. 

In statute. Beeson v, Beeson, i Harr. 466. 

and efEbot. In plea. Wright v. Clements, 3 B. & Aid. 507. 

In statute. Killman v. State, 2 Tex. App. 222 (28 Am. Rep. 432). 

In statute. Ex parte Herrick, 78 Ky. 32. 

In deed, Williams v, Burrill, i C. B. 430; Wood v. Copper Miners' 
Co., 17 C. B. 428 ; Martin v. Smith, L. R., 9 Ex. 50; Young v, Drake, 
5 N. Y. 43. 

In statute. Phillips v. Roe. 5 B. & Aid. 768 ; Com. v. Horner, 5 Mete. 
556. 

of insiiranoe. In statute. Bangs v. Skidmore, 21 N. Y. 136. 

ofoffloe. Missouri, etc., R. Co. v. City of Fort Scott, 15 Kas. 

476; Baker z/. Kirk, 33 Ind. 517. 

of one year and an indefinite period thereafter. In lease. 

Pugsley V. Aikin, 11 N. Y. 494. 

of three years. In statute. Gaillard v. Gaillard, 23 Miss. 152. 



TERM. 352 THEIR. 

— Continued. 

of yean. In statut€. Ex parte Seymour, 14 Pick. 40; Com. v. 

Evans, 16 Pick. 448. 
of yean not leas than ten. In statute. Bumham v. Onder- 



donk» 41 N. Y. 425. 

next . In statute. Com. v. Brown, 1 1 Phila. 370. 

. Gracie v. Marine Ins. Co.. 8 Cranch, 7$. 

oaah. Inbiil. Wellamer v. Fellows, 48 Wis. 10$; Geoige v. 

Joy, 19 N. H. 544. 

or oonditiona of thia policy. In insurance policy. Rokes p. 



Amazon Co., 51 Md. 512. 

preaoribed bylaw. In constitution. Speed v. Crawford, 3 

Mete. (Ky.) 207. 

Free Fishers v. Gaine, 11 C. B. (N. S.) 415 

. In statute. Re Stupp, 11 Blatchf. 155. 

In constitution. U. S. v. Gratiot, i McLean, 454. 

In statute. Whitsett v. Forehand, 79 N. C. 230. 

TE8TAJCHNT. Conklin v. Egerton, 21 Wend. 430. 

TiBTAMENTABY. oapaoity. Stackhousev. Horton, 1$ N. J. (Eq.) 202; Dof- 

field V. Robeson, 2 Harr. (Del.) 379 ; Sutton v. Sutton, 5 Harr. 
(Del. ) 459- 

eatate. In statute. Doe v. Walker, 1$ Q. B. 27. 

In will. Smith v. Coffin, 2 H. Bl. 444. 

expenaea. In staiMte. Penny v. Penny, 11 Ch. Div. 440. 

matten. In statute. McGarry v. Smith, 22 Ohio St. 190. 



TE8TIF7. aa a witneaa. In statute. Buckingham v. Bamum, 30 Conn. 

. 359. 
TESTOCOinr. Lindley v. Dakin, 13 Ind. 388; Downesv. Downes, 17 Ind. 95; Har- 

Tey V. Smith, 17 Ind. 272; McConahat/. Carr, 18 Ind. 443. 

all the — --. In bill of exceptions. Gazette Printing Co. v. Morss, 60 
Ind. 153. 

money. Roberts ^. Short, i Tex. 373. 



THAT. ' Roberts v. Opdyke. 40 N. Y. 259. 

efBM>t. In statute. Drew v. Smith, 38 Cal. 325. 

THE. Stead v. Carey, i C. B. 510. 

dhnroh. In will. Ayres v. Weed, 16 Conn. 290. 

— * foreign trade. In statute. Russell v. U. S., 15 Blatchf. 28. 

party. In statute. Noyes v. Children's Aid Soc., 70 N. Y. 4B1. 

proaeoutor. In statutt. IT. S. v. Sandford, i Cranch C. C. 323- 

right. In statute. Bradley v. South Carolina Phosphate Co^ i 

Hughes, 72. 

THEATBS. Lee v. State. 56 Ga. 477. 

THEBT. Quitzow v. State, i Tex. (App.) 65; Harbenger v. State. 4 Tex. 

(App.) 26 ; Harris v. State. 2 Tex. (App.) 102 ; Reed v. State, 8 Tex. 
(App.) 40; Shipworth v. State, 8 Tex. (App.) 138; Simes v. Stote,S 
Tex. (App.) 406. 

loaa by . In insurance policy. Webb v. Protection Ins. Co., U 

Mo. 5. 

People V. Nichols, 52 N. Y. 478. 



:i:^i; 



THEIR. 353 THEREFOR. 



:i^f: 



— Continued. 

In statute. Sands v. Delafield, 2 Paine» 49. 

In will. Sargent v. Brown, 6 Mete. /^ ^ 

Ibur story stons and briok building. In insurance policy. 
Gaylord v, Lamar Ins. Co., 40 Mo. 13. 

treight. In bill of lading, Noyes v, Campbell, 29 Vt. 79. 

hands. In declaration, Walbridge v. Arnold, 21 Conn. 425. 

legal Tepreaentatives. In will, Strob*s Appeal, 20 Pa. St. 349. 

xepxesentatives. In statute, Bloxam v, Elsee, 6 B. & C. 177. 

at daalih. In will, Wiils v. Wills, L. R., 20 Eq. Cas. 342. 

THEM. In wUl, Sargent v. Bourne. 6 Mete. 49. 

THEET. Queen v, Brownlow, 11 Ad. & Ell. 127. 

In plea. Stead v. Foyer, i 0. B. 787 ; Thornton v. Jenyns, i Man. & 
G. 190. 

In statute, Apotheearies' Co. v, Roby, $ B. ft Aid. 949. 

In will, Bullock v, Downes, 9 H. L. Cas. i ; Gray v, Bridgeforth, 33 
Miss. 312 ; Dove v. Torr, 128 Mass. 38. 

and in fhat case. In deed, Pintard v, Irwin, 20 N. J. (L.) 497 ; 

Ash V, Coleman, 24 Barb. 645. 

In wUL Chison v, Williams, 29 Mo. 288 ; Jossitti v, McGregor, 49 

Md.-202. 

« 

and there. In indictment. State v, Hayes, 24 Mo. 358 ; State 

V. Reaky, i Mo. (App.) 6 ; State v. Flay, 2 Brevard, 338 (^ Am. Dec. 
338); Daviesz'. King, 10 B. &C. 90; Com.t/. Butteriek, 106 Mass. 12. 

In bond. Morris v, Matthews, 2 Q. B. 297. 

be deadt In will. Martin v, Holgate, L. R., i H. L. Cas. 175. 

elapsed. In statute, Henniker v. Turner, 4 B.'& C. 159. 

existing. In will. Rose v, McHose, 26 Mo. 590. 

heirs at law. In will, Strob's Appeal, 20 Pa. St 349, 

In will, Heasman v, Pearse, L. R., 11 Eq. Cas. 522; 



Cooper V, MacDonald, L. R, 16 Eq. Cas. 258. 

next. In deed, Tompkins v, Corwin, 9 Cow. 255, 

she shall at their maturity. In will. Rose v, McHose, 26 

Mo. 59a 

surviving and remaining. In statute. King v, Devonshire, i 

B. &C. 618.. 

THJUiGE. westerly to the road. Goodeno v, Hutchinson, 54 N. H. 159. 

TJbLKM GEFOBTH. Farrar v. Billing, 2 B. & Aid. 176. 



TUKBTCE-FOBWABD. In statute. Queen v. Inhabitants, 15 Q. B. 43. 

In statute, Cureton v. Queen, i B. & S. 218. 

afterwards oontinning his said assault. In plea. Benson v. 



Swift, 2 Mass. 50. 

TFBIESKEiABOXTTS. In will, Jackson v, Zimmerman, 2 Caines, 146. 
TH K"igAli"l'M».. In statute. State v, Daley, 29 Conn. 272; Bry v. Woodruff, 13 La. 

558. 

mill built. In statute, Webb v. Com. 2 Leigh, 721. 

In statute. King v. St. Andrew, 10 B. & C. 745 ; re Jackson, i B. ft 
C. 271 ; Atkinson v, Raleigh, 3 Q. B. 79. 

In deed. Bean v, Atwater, 4 Conn. 3 (10 Am. Dee. 91). 
45 



THEREFORE. 



354 



THIRDS. 



THEBEFORE. In warrant. Levy v. Moylan» lo C. B. 209. 

THEBETETBEFOBE. mentioiied. In will. Nan nock z/. Horton. 7 Ves. 391. 

THEBSOF. In deed. Perry v, Davis, 3 C. B. (N. S.) 776. 

In ordinance. City of Baltimore v, Hughes, i Gill. & J. 480 (19 Am. 
Dec. 243). 

In insurance policy, Ames v, Fostor, 106 Mass. 400. 

In statute. Railroad v, Briggs, 2 Zab. 623. 

briok tenement . In deed. Wise v. Darby, 9 Mo. 135. 



*|V 



THEY. 



: • • :^ 



THZEVESr 



THINa. 



adjoining. In will. Josh v. Josh, 5 C. B. (N. S.) 465. 

belonging. In will. Doe v, Langton, 2 B. & Ad. 681 ; Josh v. 

Josh. 5 C. B. (N» S.) 465. 

THEBEUPON. Bean v, Ayers, 67 Me. 482. 

In plea, Derecourt v, Corbichley, 5. El. & Bl. 188 ; Atkinson v, Raleigh, 
3 Q. B. 79; Brown v, Mallett, 5 C. B. 600; Improved Soap Co.v. 
Cooper, 8 C. B. (N. S.) 814; Deunebey v, Woodson, 100 Mass. 19$; 
Bean v, Ayers, 67 Me. 482. 

THEBEWTFH. In statute, Capell v. Aston, 8 C. B. 5. 

outrages. In offer of reward. Freeman v. City of Boston, S 

Mete. 58. 

if leave no ohildren. In will. Doe v, Knowles, i B. & Ad. 327. 

Fausett v. Clark, 48 Md. 494. 

In libel, Thompson v, Bernard, i Camp. 48. 

In bill of lading, Taylor v, Liverpool Steam Co., L. R., 9 Q. R S4^ ; 
Spinette v. Atlas Steam Co., 14 Hun, 100. 

In insurance policy, American Ins. Co. v, Bryan, 26 Wend. 563 (37 
Am. Dec. 278) ; i Hill, 25 ; Atlantic Ins. Co. v, Storrow, 5 Paige, 
292. 

done in pnxBuanoe of thia act. In statute. Edge v, Parker. 8 

B. & C. 697. 

patented. In statute. Day v. Union India Rubber Co., 3 

Blatchf. 504 ; McClurg v, Kingsland, i How. 202. 

In will. Stuart v, Bute, i Dow. 73 ; 11 Ves. 666. 

in action. In statute. Re Jackson, L. R., 12 Eq. Cas. 354; Dry 

Dock Bank v, Ins. Co., 3 N. Y. 344. 

necessary for the cultiyation of a ifeinn. In statute, Hennan 

V, Perkins, 52 Miss. 813 ; Cook v, Ligon, 54 Miss. 368; Wright v. 
Walton, 56 Miss. i« 

all whatsoever, whether real or personal. In deecL Ingell v. 

Nooney, 2 Pick. 362 (13 Am. Dec. 434). 

as he may best. . In deed, Cassidy v. Cook, 99 111. 385. 

if he shall fit. In statute. Ex parte Ramsay, 18 Q. B. 174. 

parties. Morrison v, Trudean, i Mart. (N. S.) 384. 

persons. In statute. Griffin v, Wertz, 2 Bradwell, 487 ; Teh- 

macher v. Thompson, 18 Cal. 11 ; Leese v. Clark, 18 Cal. 535 ; De 
Arguello v. Greer, 26 Cal. 615 ; Beard v, Federy, 3 Wall. 479. 

any person. In statute, Fosdick v. Schall, 99 U. S. 235, 

In will. Baker v. Red, 4 Dana, 158. 

>'8 . In will. Horsey v. Horsey, i Houst 438 ; O'Hara v. 



THINGHSI. 



THINK. 



• 1:41 



THEEtDED. 
THIRDS. 



Dever, 2 Abb. Pr. (N. S.) 418. 



THIRTY. 



355 



TIMBERS. 



THIBTY. days' public notioe. In deed. German Bank v. Stumpf, 6 Mo. 

(App.) 17. 
THOBOTTGHFABE. nearest public . In statute. Coulbert v, Troke, i Q. B. 

Div. I. 

THOXTSAND. In lease. Smith v, Wilson, 3 B. & Ad. 729. 

THBEAD. laoes. /// statute. Arthur v. Lahey, 6 Otto, 113; Steegman 2^. 

Maxwell, 3 Blatchf. 366 ; Lottimer v, Laurence, i Blatchf. 614. 

In statute. Com. v. Murphy, 12 Allen, 449. 



THKBATENED. Hext v. Gill, L. R., 7 Ch. App. 700. 

with an attack. In statute, Polk v. State, 62 Ala. 239. 

THBEAt JfiH JLJM a. letter. People v. Griffin, 2 Barb. 427. 



THBEATS. 



THBOAT. 



nrr 



THBOWir. 



■ :i:h: 



In indictment. Jones v. State, 10 Tex. (App.) 552. 

In statute. Hamilton v. State, 11 Tex. (App.) 119; Wood v. Bowron, 
7 B. & S. 942. 

or intimidation. In statute, Walshby v. Auly, 3 El. & El. 523. 

disease. In insurance policy. Eisner v. Guardian Ins. Co., 3 

* Cent. L. J. 302. 

eleyators. ' In statute. Gill v. Cacy, 49 Md. 243. 

without transfer. In bill of lading, Robinson v. Merchants' 



Dispatch Trans. Co., 45 Iowa, 470 ; Stewart v. Merchants' Dispatch 
Trans. Co., 47 Iowa, 229. 

privilege to pass and repass said lot of land . In deed. Choate 

V. Burnham, 7 Pick. 274. 

into bankruptcy* Wilcox v, Toledo, etc., R. Co., 45 Mich. 280. 

lottery • In statute. Freleigh v. State, 8 Mo. 606. 

In statute. Allaire v. Howell Works Co., 14 N. J. (L.) 21. 

lands. In statute. People v. Davidson, 30 Cal. 379 ; Randell v. 

Fay, 32 Cal. 354; Walker v. State Harbor Comm'rs, 17 Wall. 648; 
Walker v. Marks, 2 Sawyer, 1 52. 

— water. Attorney-General v. Woods, 108 Mass. 439 ; Com. v. Vin- 
cent, 108 Mass. 447. 

Vigar V. Dudman, L. R., 6 C. P. 470 ; L. R., 7 C. P. 72. 

In order of court. Bruce v. Reed, 16 Barb. 352; Dawkins v. Wagner, 3 
Dowl. P. C. 535. 

paid. In note, Pittman v. Barrett, 34 Mo. 84. 

the payment Jof said(note. In deed. Johnston v. Morrow, 60 

Mo. 339. 

Jackson v. Brownson, 7 Johns. 234. 

In contract. Nash z/.'Drisco, 51 Me. 417 ; Hunter v. Hunter, 17 Barb. 

25. 
In statute. U. S. v. Schuler, 6 McLean, 28 ; Com. v. Noxon, 121 Mass. 
42 ; King v. Inhabitants, i B. & C. 379. 

In will. Newdegate v, Newdegate, 2 CI. & F. 601. 

and other trees. In deed. Legh v, Heald, i B. & Ad. 625. 

fbr building. In deed. Livingston v. Ten Broeck, 16 Johns. 14 

(8 Am. Dec. 287). 

wood and trees. Com. v. Noxon, 121 Mass. 42. 

and lumber of all kinds. In treaty, U. S. v. Hathaway, 4 



Wall. 404 ; U. S. V, Quimby, 4 Wall. 408. 



^IME. 356 TO. 

aforoitid. In degd. Sanborn v. Chamberlin, 101 Mass. 409. 

of the bftakniptoy. In statuU, Re May, 7 Ben. 238. 

of the iajiiry. In staiuii. A. B. v, C. B., 34 N. J. (Eq.) 44. 

at any . in statute. Heston v, St. Bridges, i El. & BL 583. 

at any hereafter. In contract. Bridges v. Potts, 17 C. B. (N. S.) 

at the . In statute, Btssell v. Balcom, 39 N. Y. 275. 

at the of exeoutiaff thia my last will. In will. Soottv. 

Guernsey, 60 Barb. 163. 

at the of her death. In will. Doe v. Prevost, 4 Johns. 61 (4 

Am. Dec. 249). 

at the pay. In statute. Hunter v. Wetzell, 84 N. Y. 549. 

at all . In statute. Re Dale, 1 1 Blatchl 500. 

In statute. Le Couteur v. R. Co., 6 B. & S. 968. 

TDT. plates. In statute. May v. Simmons, 4 Fed. Rep. 502. 

teme . In statute. Brice v. Murphy, 10 Blatchf. 231. 

TixvjrOIIi. or its eqniyalents. In decree. Poppenhausen v. New York 

Gutta Percha Comb Co., 4 Blatchf. 254. 

TZPFIanfO-HOTTSR Roop v. People, 47 111. 327 ; Patten v. Centralia, 47 IlL 370. 

TITHS8. In statute. King v. Lacy. $ B. & C. 708- 

TITLB. Bowman v. Sheldon, 5 Sandf. 657. 

In contract. Jones v, Gardner, 10 Johns. 266. 

In insurance policy. Merrill v. Ins. Co., 73 N. T. 452 ; Springfield Ins. 
Co. V. Allen, 43 N. Y. 389. 

Li statute. Rodgers v. Palmer, 33 Conn. 155 ; Davila v. Munfoid, 24 
How. 214; Reg. V. Everett, 1 £1. & BL 276^ 

and interest in fbotory and mills. In wiU. Clark v. Ander- 
son, 13 Bush, III. 

of the aotion. In statute. Clickman v. Cllckman, i N. Y. 611. 

to any toll. Injtmtut^. Hunt v. R. Co., 10 C. B. 900. 

- to land. In statute. Arrington v. Liscom, 34 Cal. 365 ; Gregoiy 
V. KanoQse. 11 N. J. (L.) 62 ; Ehle v. Quackenbos» 6 Hill, 537. 

to real estate. In statute. Campfield v. Johnson, i Zab.83; 

Young V. Freeman, 3 Green, 30. 

, right, privilege or imnunity. In statute. Long v. Convene, 

\ Otto, 105. 

abstract of . In contract. Sharland v. Leifchild, 4 C. B. 537. 

change take plaee in • In insurance policy^ Commercial Ins. 

Co. V. Scammon, 102 111. 46. 

indefeasible in fee simple such as the State makes. In deed. 

Keely v. Bradford, 3 Bibb, 317 (6 Am. Dec 656). 

shall be expressed in the . In constitution. People v. Briggs, 

50 N. Y. 553 ; re Mayor, 50 N. Y. 504; People v. Allen, 42 N. Y, 404; 
Grordon v. Cornes, 47 N. Y. 608 ; Sun Mut. Ins. Co. v. Mayor, 8 K. 
Y. 240 ; Brewster v. City of Syracuse, 19 N. Y. 116; City of Kansas 
V. Payne, 71 Mo. 162 ; State v. Mead, 71 Mo. 266; re Goode» 3 Mo- 
(App.) 229 ; City of St. Louis v. Green, 7 Mo. (App.) 468. 

TITULO. De Haro v. U. S.. 5 Wall. 600. 

TO. Delorme v. Ferk, 24 Wis. 202. 

In deed. Wells v. Iron Co.. 48 N. H. 493. 



TO. 



357 



TONNAGE. 



TO — Coniinued. 



TOBAOOO. 



TOa] 



: I :h : 



Tou:.. 



TOir. 



TOIOTAOS. 



In statute, Hazelhurst v. Freeman, (2 Ga. 244 ; Bradley t^. Rea, 13 Me. 
198; Moses V. Pittsburg, etc., R. Co., 21 III. 516. 

aooonnt. tn contract. Cushman v, Richards, 100 Mass. 232. 

and amongBt. In will. Doe v. Alchin, 2 B. & Aid. 124. 

and from the Illinoia shore. In contract, Wiggins' Ferry Co. 

V, Chicago, etc., R Co., 5 Mo. (App.) 347. 

be paid. In due bill, Ubsdell v, Cunningham, 22 Mo. 124. 

bequeath to. In will. Nelson v. Combs, 3 Harr. 27. 

or from the port. In statute. The Maria, L. R., i Adm. ft Ecc. 

353. 
pay. In order, Terry v. City of Milwaukee, 1 5 Wis. 492. 

R street. In city ordinance, Schumacker v, Tiberman, 56 Cal. 

510. 

the bank. In deed, Thomas v. Hatch, 3 Sumner, 179. 

interest July 26. In promissory note, Stearns v. Sweet, 78 111. 

446. 
kno'wn — ^— 



— . In indictment. Com. v. Griffin, 105 Mass. 17$. 

Portland Boston. In railway ticket. Keeley v. B. ft M. R. R. 

67 Me. 163. 

pressing, no manufiusturing. In insurance policy. Sims v. 

State Ins. Co., 47 Mo. 54. 

with. Annandale v. Brazier, 5 B. ft Aid. 69. 

living . In statute, Maull v. State, 37 Ala. i6a 

written . In statute, Jones v. State, 50 Ind. 473. 

Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Delaware, etc., Canal Co., 29 Barb. 589 ; i 
Keyes, 72. 

In constitution. Brown v. Rice, $2 Cal. 489. 

In deed, Lockwood v. Wood, 6 Q. B. 31. 

In statute. Pegler v, Monmouthshire R. Co., 6 Hurl, ft N. 650 ; Pryce 
V, R. Co., 4 App. Cas. 197; Lake Superior, etc., R. Co. v. U. S.» 3 
Otto, 442 ; Reg. v, Everett, i El. ft Bl. 276. 

immediate . Hollingworth v. State, 29 Ohio St. 552. 

In statute, Barnes v. White, i C. B. 213. 

In statute, Caswell v. Cook, 11 C. R (N. S.) 649. 

Weber v, Fegely, 29 Pa. St 27 ; Roberts v, Opdyke, 40 N. Y. 259, 

In contract. The Miantinomi, 3 Wall. Jr. 50; Many v, Beekman Iron 
Co., 9 Paige, 188. 

In statute. Green v, Moffelt, 22 Mo. 529. 

Thwing V, Great Western Ins. Co., 103 Mass. 406. 

In insurance policy. Beck v. Phoenix Ins. Co., 16 Hun, 344. 

In statute, Inman Steam Co. v. Tucker, 4 Otto, 241. 

duty of . In constitution. North Western Packet Co. v, St. 

Paul, 3 Dill. 454 ; Packet Co. v, Keokuk, 5 Otto, 80 ; Cannon v. 
New Orleans, 20 Wall. 577 ; Steamship Co. v, Portwardens, 6 Wall. 
31; State Tonnage Tax Cases, 12 Wall. 204; Cooley v. Board of 
Wardens, 12 How. 299; Inman Steamship Co. v. Tucker, 94 U. S. 
238 ; The North Cape, 6 Biss. 505 ; Alexander v, Wilmington, etc., 
R Co., 3 Strobh. 594; Keokuk v, Keokuk Packet Co., 45 lo^"^ 
196 ; Lott V, Collector, 43 Ala. 578. 



TONS 



358 



TOW. 



TONS. 
TOOK. 

TOOLS. 



TOBIOSNT. 
TOBT. 

TOBTUBB. 
TOTAL. 



TOUCH. 



TOUCHING. 
TOW. 



about 500 . In contract. Bourne t/. Seymour, 16 C. R 35a 

the oatli in suoh case reqiiired by the act of CongreM. In 

certificate. Com. v. Towles, 5 Leigh (Va.), 743. 

In insurance policy, Lovewell v. West. Ins. Co., 124 Mass. 418. 

In statute. Patten v. Smith, 4 Conn. 450 (10 Am. Dec. 166) ; Tanner 
V, Billings, 18 Wis. 164; Batchelder v, Shapleigh, 10 Me. 135 (25 
Am. Dec. 213); Wilkinson v. Alley, 45 N. H. 551; Spooncr v. 
Fletcher, 3 Vt. 133 (21 Am. Dec. 579) ; Kilbum v. Denning, 2 Vt. 
404 (21 Am. Dec. 543 note) ; Lenoir v. Weeks, 20 Ga. 596; Daily v. 
May, 5 Mass. 313; Danforth t^. Woodward, 10 Pick. 423; Robinson's 
Case, 3 Abb. Pr. 466 ; Bitting v, Vanderburgh, 17 How. Ft. 80; 
Garrett v, Patchin, 29 Vt. 248. 

implements, ixistroments and peraonal property whatao- 

ever. In statute. U. S. v. Thirty-three Barrels of Spirits, i Abb. 
U. S. 313. 

neoooaary for hia trade or oooupation. In statute. Danfoitb 



V, Woodward, 10 Pick. 423 (20 Am. Dec. 531) ; Pierce v. Gray, 7 
Gray, 69. 

— ofamedhanic. In statute, Whitcorab v, Reid, 31 Miss. 567; 
Buckingham v. Billings, 13 Mass. 82; Howard v, Williams, 2 Pick. 
80 ; Goddard v. Chaffee, 2 Allen, 395 ; Grimes v, Bryne, 2 Minn. 89. 

— or implements. In statute, Cutts v. Ward, 8 R & S. 287. 

— used in maWng aerges. In statute. Rex v. Hill, i Russ. k Ry. 



483. 
medhanioal 



In statute, Mazon v, Perrott, 17 Mich. 332. 



of a tradesman. In statute, Richey t/. McCauley, 

4 Pa. St. 471. 

working . In statute, Healy v, Bateman, 2 R. L454; Ford v. 

Johnson, 34 Barb. 364. 

or torture. In statute. Stage Horse Cases, 15 Abb. Pr. (N. 



S.) 15. 

Philadelphia, etc., R. Co. v, Phil., etc.. Steam Co., 23 How. 209. 

fbunded on . In statute, Pontifez v, R. Co., 3 Q. B. Div. 27. 

In statute. State v, Pugh, 1 5 Mo. 509. 

loss. In insurance policy, Wallerstein v, Columbian Ins. Co., 3 

Robt. $28 ; Singleton v, Boone Ins. Co., 45 Mo. 250 ; Rhinelander 
V, Ins. Co., 4 Cranch, 41; Alexander v, Ins. Co., 4 Cranch, 370: 
Ins. Co. V, Fogarty, 19 Wall. 640; Co(>elin v, Ins. Co., 9 Wall. 461 : 
Livermore v. Marine Ins. Co., i Mass. 264; Williams v. Hartford 
Ins. Co., 54 Cal. 422; Patapsco Ins. Co. v, Southgate, 5 Pet. 604; 
Marcardier v, Ins. Co., 8 Cranch, 40; Smith v. Universal Ins. Co., 6 
Wheat. 176; Dixon v. Reed, 5 B. & Aid. 598; Navone v, Haddon, 9 
C. B. 42 ; Moss V, Smith, 9 C. R 94 ; Irving v. Manning, i H. L. 
Cas. 287 ; Allen v, Sugrue, 8 B. & C. 564. 

loss only. In insurance policy, Willard v. Millers & Man. Ins. 



Co., 24 Mo. 561 ; Adams v, Mackenzie, 13 C. R (N. S.) 444- 

liberty to at. In marine policy, Maryland Ins. Co. v, Le Roy. 

7 Cranch, 26 ; U. S. v. The Paul Sherman, Pet C. C. 104 ; Stitt v. 
Warden, i Esp. 610. 

or oonoeming the last-mentioned judgment. In statmu. 



Solomon v, Graham, 5 El. & Bl. 324. 

— and assist vessels. In bill of lading, Stuart v, British, etc.. 
Steam Co., 32 L. T (N. S.) 257. 



TO WAGE. 



359 



TRADE . 



TOWAGIS. 
TOWABD. 

TOWABD8. 

TOWN. 



TO^ 



:Kti: 



Baker v. Hemenway, 2 Lowell, 501 ; The H. B. Foster, Abb. Adm. 222. 

insulting language a female relation. ^In statute, Hudson v. 

State, 6 Tex. (App.) 565. 

and unto. In indictment. King v. Marchioness, 4 Ad. & Ell. 



232. 

In contract, Steyer v, Dwyer, 31 Iowa, 20. 

In statute. State v. Common Council, 20 Wis. 90 ; State v, Gold- 
stucker, 40 Wis. 124; Beaudette v. Fond du Lac, 40 Wis. 44; Kitt- 
ridge v, Milwaukee, 26 Wis. 44 ; Gates v, McDaniel, 2 Stew. (Ala.) 
211 (19 Am. Dec. 49); Holmes v. Mayor of Jersey City, 12 N. J. 
(Eq.) 299; Peck v, Weddell, 17 Ohio St. 271 ; Rafter z/. Sullivan, 13 
Abb. Pr. 262 ; State v, Glennon, 3 R. L 276 ; Truax v. Pool, 46 Iowa, 
256 ; Comm'rs v, McGarrin, 6 Daly, 349 ; Harris v, Shyrock, 82 III. 
119 ; Murray z/.Menefee, 20 Ark. 561 ; Milarkey v, Foster, 6 Oregon, 
378; Queen v. Cattle, 16 Q. B. 412; Collier v. Worth, i Ex. Div. 
464 ; Smith v. Sherry, 50 Wis., 210 ; Chicago, etc., R. Co. v. Oconto, 
50 Wis. 189 (36 Am. Rep. 840). 

olerk. In statute, .Rafler v, Sullivan, 13 Abb. Pr. 362. 

oommiaaioners. In statute. Shaver v, Comm., 68 N. C. 291. 

— corporate. In statute. Brown v, Nicholson, 5 C. B. (N. S.) 
478. 

— hotuie. In statute, French v. Inhabitants, 3 Allen, 9. 
-^ meeting. In statute, Chicago, etc., R. Co. v, Mallory, loi 111. 

583. 



order. Emery v, Mariaville, 56 Me. 315. 

or village. In statute, Flinn v. State, 24 Ind. 286. 

pound* Wooley v. Inhabitants, 2 Cush. 305. 

way. In statute. Black stone v, Gom'rs, 108 Mass. 69. 



In contract, Jackson Township v. Home Ins. Co., 54 Ind. 184. 
In statute. Re Borough of Frackville, 94 Pa. St. 56. 
In constitution. Rice v, Ruddiman, 10 Mich. 125. 

In statute, Boston & Alb., etc., R. Co. v. President, etc., of Greenbush* 
52 N. Y. 510. 

In deed, Edwards v, Derrickson, 28 N. J. (L.) 31. 

In deed. Doe v. Bird, 2 Ad. & Ell. 161. 

In statute, Bk. v, Wilson, 3 Ex. Div. 108 ; King v. Mayor, 7 B. & C. 
630 ;' Speak «/. Powell, L. R., 9 Ex. 25; The Nymph, Ware, 257 ; i Sum- 
ner, 516; Atwood V, DeForest, 19 Conn. 513; Whitcomb v, Reid, 
31 Miss. 567; Higginson z/. Pomeroy, 11 Mass. 104. 

adventure or oonoem. In statute, Ryhope Coal Co. v. Foyer, 

7 Q. B. Div. 485. 
as aforesaid. In statute. King v. Turner, 4 B. & Aid. 515 ; Dean 



V, King, 4 B. & Aid. 518. 

of merchandise between merchant and merchant. In statute, 

Murray v. Coster, 20 Johns. 576. 

or business. In statute, Wallace v, Bartlett, 108 Mass. 52. 

other than that for which she is licensed. In statute. The 

Two Friends, i Gall. 118. 

act izgurious to or commerce. In statute. People v, Fisher, 

14 Wend. 9 (28 Am. Dec. 501). 



TRADE. 



360 



TRANSACTIONS. 



TBADB— Continued. 

implements of a debtor's 

93 (26 Am. Rep. 430). 

in their late or present — 
856. 

persona seeking their — 

statute, Cobb v, Symonds, 5 B. & Aid. 518. 

nseftil . In will, Dandridge v, Custis, 2 Peters, 370. 



— . In statute, Enscoez/. Dunn,44Cono. 
-• In deed, Calvert v. Reid, 10 R & C. 
or living by buying and selling. In 



TBADSJiABX 



using the of merohaadiae. In statute, Wakeman v, Hoyt, $ 

Law Rep. 307. 

Hembold v, Hembold Manufacturing Co., 53 How. Pr. 453 ; New- 
man V, Alvord, 51 N. Y. 189 ; Oilman v. Hunnewell, 122 Mass. 139; 
Osgood V, Allen, i Holmes, 185 ; Feigoson v. Daval Mills, 7 Phila. 
253 ; Oandee v. Deere, 54 111- 439 ; Delaware v. Hudson Canal Co., 
13 Wall. 311 ; Trade*Mark Cases, 100 U. S. 82; Burke v, CassiD,4$ 
Cal. 457 ; Hall i^. Barrows, 33 L. J. (Eq.) 204; Leather Cloth Go. v. 
American Cloth Co., 35 L. J. 53 ; Filley v, Fassett, 44 Mo. 168 ; 
Moorman v, Hope, 2 Sa^er, 86. 

L% statute, Newland v. Bell, Holt N. P. 222 ; King v. Turner, 4 R & 
Aid. 515 ; Dean v. King, 4 B. & Aid. 518; King v, Siramonds, i H. 
L. Cas. 754; re Ryan, 2 Sawyer, 417; State v, Chadboum, 80 N. C. 
479 (30 Am. Rep. 94) ; re Smith, 2 Lowell, 69 ; re Wood, 7 Bank 
Reg. 126. 

any bona flde . In mortgage. May v, Sloan, loi U. S. 231. 

In statute. Re Merritt, 7 Fed. Rep. 853 ; re Stickney, 5 Dill. 91 ; re 
Cote, 2 Lowell, 374 ; Queen v. Cleworth, 4 B. & S. 927 ; The Cocks, 
3 Ben. 260. 

merdhant or . In statute. Re Stickney, 5 Dill. 94; re Wood- 
ward, 8 Ben. 565 ; re Newman, 3 Ben. 22 ; re Marston, 5 Ben. 313; 
re Garrison, 5 Ben. 430. 

The Rapid, 8 Cranch, 162. 

oorporation. Adams v, Boston, etc., R. Co., i Holmes, 50. 

establishment. In statute, Kent v, Astley, 10 R & S. 802. 

or dealing. In statute. Smith v, Hurrell. 10 B. & C. 543. 

or other publio company. In statute. Re Griffith, 12 Ch. 

Div. 655. 

person going firom town to town. In statute, Manson v. 

Hope, 2 B. & S. 498. 

voyage. Brown v, Jones, 2 Gall. 477. 

^in. In statute, Clifford v. State, 29 Wis. 329. 

TBAINJLNO-FTBLD. to be used [as a forever. In statute, Wellington v. 

Petitioners, 16 Pick. %^ (26 Am. Dec. 631). 

— all business. In statute, Hogg v, Snaith, i Taunt. 351. 



TBABnra. 



TBAPFIC. 



TRANSACfT. — 

TRANSACTION. King?/. Pinsoneault, L. R., 6 P. C. C. 245. 

In statute, Ritchie v, Hayward, 71 Mo. 560; Barhyte v. Hughes. 
33 Barb. 320 ; Brewin v. Short, 5 El. & Bl. 230. 

or oommimioation. In statute, Hier v. Grant, 47 N. Y. 278. 

or statement by a deoeased person. Tisdale v. Max- 



well, 58 Ala. 405 ; Miller v. Clay, 57 Ala. 162. 

TRANSACTIONS. In statute, Lackington v, Elliott, 7 Man. & G. S44 : Scarborough 

V. Smith, 18 Kas. 399. 



TRANSACTIONS. 361 ' , TRAVELING. 

TBANaACnONS — Continued. 

witli or statement by a deceased party In statute, Bennett 

v. Frary, 55 Tex. 145. 
TBANSGBIFT. In statute, U. S. v, Patterson, Gilpin, 44. 

TRANSFER. In insurance policy. Batchelor v. People's Ins. Co., 4o];Conn. 56 ; 

Waterbury Savings Bk. v, Lawler, 46 Conn. 243. 

In plea, Montague v. King, 37 Miss. 441. 

In statute. Waterbury Savings Bk. v. Lawler, 46 Conn. 243 ; Copeland 
V, R. Co., 6 El. & Bl. 284. 

or change of title. In insurance policy, Dreslerz/. ^Etna Ins. 

Co., 18 Mo. 128, 

TRANSFERABLE. at the bank. In certificate. Williams v. Mechanics' Bk., 

S Blatchf. 61. 

not . In railroad ticket, Cody v. Central Pacific R. Co., 4 

Sawyer, 117. 

TBANSFEBBinD. to be . In will. Player v, Nichote, i B. & C. 344. 

or changed. In insurance policy. Starkweather v, Cleveland 

Ins. Co., 2 Abb. (U. S.) 68. 

TRANSFERS. In statute. Sands v. Hill, 55 N. Y. 18. 

TRANSIENT. person. In statute, Goodell v. Mount Holly, 51 Vt 423. 

TRANSITORY. aoUoa. Mostyn v, Pabrigas, i Smith's L. C. 1024; Mason v. 

Warner, 31 Mo. 99S; Henwood v, Cheeseman, 3 S. & R. 500; 
Livingston v, Jefferson, i Brock. 203; Greeley v, Stillson, 27 Mich. 
153; Jones V, Pemberton, 7 N.J. (L.) 350; Smith v. Bull, 17 Wend. 
323 ; Barney v, Burnstenbinder, 64 Barb. 212 ; Illinois, etc., R. Co. 
V, Swearengen, 33 111. 289 ; Lewis v, Martin, 2 Day, 263. 

In statute, Pearce «/. Atwood, 13 Mass. 324; Eames v, Carlisle, 3 N. 
H. 130. 

TRANSPORT. Shrewsbury v, U. S., 18 Wall. 664 ; White v. Tug, 6 Cal. 470. 

In statute, U. S. v, Sheldon, 2 Wheat. 119. 
TRANSPORTATION. Council Bluffs v. Kansas City R. Co., 45 Iowa, 338. 

In statute, Bullpck v, Dodds, 2 B. & Aid. 264. 

company. In statute. Columbus Conduit Co. v. Com., 90 Pa. 

St. 307. 

TRAVELED. place. In statute, Whitaker v. Boston, etc., R. Co.. 7 Gray, 98. 

TRAVELER. In statute, O'Connell v, Lewiston, 65 Me. 34 ; Hardy v. Keene, 52 N. 

H. 370 ; Leslie v. Lewiston, 62 Me. 468 ; McCarthy v, Portland, 67 
Me. 167 ; McDougallT/. Salem, no Mass. 21 ; Britton v. Inhabitants, 
107 Mass. 347 ; Blodgett v. City of Boston, 8 Allen, 237 ; Peache 
V, Colman» L, R., i C. P. 233 ; i Uarr. & Ruth. 393 ; Atkinson v. 
Sellers, 5 C. B. (N. S.) 445 ; Taylor v, Humphreys, 10 C. B. (N. S.) 
430; McDougall V, Salem, no Mass. 21. 

TRAVELERS. In statute. Taylor 2/. Humpkins, 17 C. B. (N. S.) 539; Portsmouth 

Bridge Co. v. Nance, 6 Man. & G. 233. 

TBAVSLZNG. In statute. White v. Beazley, i B. & Aid. 170 ; Ramsden v. Gibbs, 

I B. & C. 326 ; Gholson v. State, 53 Ala. 521 ; Baker v. State, 49 
Ala. 350 ; Eslava v. State, 49 Ala. 355 ; Locketti/. State, 47 Ala. 42 ; 
Coker v. State, 63 Ala. 96 ; Hardy v, Keene, 52 N. H. 370 ; Clark v. 
Com., 4 Pick. 125 ; Cummings v. Centre Harbor, 57 N. H. 17. 

or eettingotitonajoimiey. In statute. Gholson v. State, 53 

Ala. SI9- 
46 



TRA VELING. 



362 



TRIAL 



TRAyVLING^ Continued 



TBSA80N. 



TBBASUBY. 
« TBJBATIB8. 

TBJBATY. 



upon a highway. Lt s/a/uU. Cummings v. Center Harbor, $7 

N. H. 18. 

while by publio or private oonyeyanoes. Ik tucident policy. 

Northup V, R. P. Ass. Co.. 43 N. Y. 516. 

In statute, O'Connell v, Lewiston, 65 Me. 34. 

Charge to grand jury, 2 Wall. Jr. 124; U. S. v. Pryor, 3 Wash. C. C- 
235 ; U. S. V, Bollman, i Cranch C. C. 373 ; U. S, v, Hanway, 2 Wall. 
Jr. 199; Short ridge v. Mason, i A.bb. (U. S.) 58 ; U. S. v, Greathouse, 

4 Sawyer, 464. 

fblony or other crime. In constitution. Commonwealth of 

Ky. V, Dennison, 24 How. 66. 

for the time being. In note, Tunnis v, Williams, 3 Q- B. 413. 

the , In constitution, Straub v. Lohman, 27 Ark. 625. 

oases ari^ring under . In constitution. Owings v, Norwood, 

5 Cranch, 344. 

Holmes v, Jennison, 14 Peters, 572. 

Idol V, Jones, 2 Dev. (L.) 162. 

Jenney v. Brook, 6 Q. B. 330. 

In statute. Rex v, Taylor, z Russ. ft Ry. 373. 

woods, ooppioOy wood-grounds of what kind or growth 

soever. In deed, Windham v. Way, 4 Taunt. 316. 

timber and other . In deed, Bullen v. Denning, 5 B. & C. 847. 

Beardslee v. French, 7 Conn. 12$ (18 Am. Dec 125) ; Dexter v. Cole, 6 
Wis. 319; Juando v, Taylor, 2 Paine, 652. 

\In statute. State v. Hart, 7 Mo. 321 ; U. S. v, Flanakin, Hempst 30 : 
Ten Eyck v, Runk. 31 N. J. (L.) 428; Blood v, Kemp, 4 Pick. 171. 

on the oase. Farrow v, Hague, 3 H. & C. 109. 

In statute, Humiston v. Smith. 22 Conn. 23. 

Anderson v, Pennie, 32 Cal. 265 ; U. S. v, Curtis, 4 Mason, 232 ; Jenks 
V, State, 39 Ind. i. 

In statute. Stone v. Sargent, 129 Mass. 503 ; Piatt v, Sauk Co. Bk., 17 
Wis. 226 ; Gordon v, Scott, 3 Pittsb. 109 ; Allaire v. Lee, 1 Abb. Pr. 
125 ; Mygatt v, Wilcox, 35 How. Pr. 410 ; Reg. v, Faderman, Temp. 

6 Mew. 293 ; Reg. v. Clements, Temp. & Mew. 580. 

anew. In statute, Boggs v. Brooks, 45 Mo. 232. 

before a jury. In statute, Strafer v, Carr, 6 Fed. Rep. 466. 

by jury. In constitution, Vaughan v, Scode, 30 Mo. 600; State 

V, McClear, 11 Nev. 39; People v, Henck, 21 N. Y. 595. 

of an issue. Randolph v, Foster, 3 E. D. Smith, 648; 4 Abb. Pr. 



262. 

before . In statute, Winship v. People, 51 111. 296 ; U. S. «?. 

Curtis,«4 Mason, 232. 

l)efore the or final hearing. In statute, Whittier v. Ins. Co., 

55 N. H. 141 ; Chandler v, Coe, 56 N. H. 184 ; Jifkins v. Sweetzer, 12 
Otto, 179; Galpin v, Critchlow, 112 Mass. 339; Ins. Co. v. I>unn, 
19 Wall. 214 ; Vannevar v, Bryant, 21 Wall. 41 ; Minnett v Milwan- 
kee, etc., R. Co., 3 Dill. 460. 

on . In statute. Com. v, Maclennan, 121 Mass. 31. 



TRIAL. 



363 



TR USTEE. 



TBIAIi — Continued. 

on the 



TBIAIJ3. 



— of this oaufle. In stipulation, Hinckley v. Beck with, 
23 Wis. 328. 

such . In constitution, U. S. v, Dawson, 1 5 How. 488. 

question of law whioh may arise in oriminal . In statute. 



TBIBE. 



Reg. V, Martin, Temp. & M. 78. 

Tndian . U. S. v, Joseph, 4 Otto, 614 ; U. S. v, Holliday, 3 Wall. 

.407. 

TBIBUTABIBS. the Mississippi and . In insurance policy. Miller z/. Ins. Co., 

12 W. Va. 116 (29 Am. Rep. 452). 

before he shall be . In statute, U. S. v, Curtis, 4 Mason, 232. 

cause is . In statute, Reg. v. Inhabitants, 3 Q. B. 900. 

not . In statute. Re Maltby, 7 Q. B. Div. 18. 



TRTKT). 



In statute, Bernstein v, Baxendale, 6 C. B. (N. S.) 251 ; Davey v. 
Mason, Carr. & M. 45. 

In will, Attorney-General v, Harley, 5 Russ. 173. 

In constitution, Dunne v. People, 94 111. i2o. 

TROUBLE. In statute, Whitney v, Lynn, 122 Mass. 338. 

TBOVBB. Bushel v. Miller, i Strange, 128 ; Falk v, Fletcher, 18 C. R (N. S.) 403. 

TBTTGODCASTEB. In libel. Homer v, Taunton, 5 Hurl. & N. 662. 

ground and substance of the defense. In statute, Merrill v, 

Everett, 38 Conn. 48. 

value. In statute, U. S. v. Tappan, 11 Wheat. 419: Tappan v. 



U. S., 2 Mason, 393. 

— vote. In statute. State v, McLin, 16 Fla. 17. 



TBI78T. 



Hutchins v, Heywood, 50 N. H. 491 ; Coate's Appeal, 2 Pa. St. 133; 
Pennock's Estate, 20 Pa. St. 268; Saylor v, Paine, 31 Md. 158; 
Commrs. v. Walker, 6 How. (Miss.) 143 (38 Am. Dec. 433). 

estate Cooper v. Cooper, 5 N. J. (Ex.) 12. 

reposed in him as assistant book-keei)er. In bond, Roch- 
ester City Bank v, Elwood, 21 N. Y. 88. 

direct . Commrs. v. Walker, 6 How. (Miss.) 143 (38 Am. Dec. 

433). 
express Norse v, Morse, 85 N. Y. 33. 

fbithftd discharge of his . In statute, Boyden v, U. S., 13 Wall. 17. 



goods in 



In insurance policy. Waters v. Monarch Ins. Co., 5 



TBinsrcEB. 



EI. & Bl. 870. 

in . In will, Tappan 's Appeal, 55 N. H. 317 ; King v, Mitchell, 8 

Peters, 326. 

held by him in . In insurance policy, Stillwell v. Staples, 18 N. 

Y. 401 ; Beidelman v, Powell, 10 Mo. (App.)28o. 

merchandise held in . In insurance policy. Home Ins. Co. v, 

Baltimore Warehouse Co., 3 Otto, 527. • 

Saylor z/. Paine, 31 Md. 158. 

In certificate, Shaw v, Spencer, 100 Mass. 388. 

In contract, Thompson v, Toland, 48 CaL 99. - , 

In note. Westmoreland 7/. Foster. 60 Ala. 448; Pease v. Pease, 35 
Conn. 15;; Third Nat. Bk. 7/. Lan^e, 51 Md. 138. 



TR VSTEE. 



364 



UNA VOIDABLE. 



TBI78THB ^ Continued. 

In statuU. Reg. v, Fletcher, 9 Cox C. C. 180; Com. v. Hays, 14 Gray, 
63 ; Cornwall v, Todd, 38 Conn. 443 ; Gardner v, Cowles, 3 Ch. Div. 
305 ; ex parte Hawkins, L. R.', 3 Ch. App. 787. 

^ ezeoutor or other i>0r8on having oontrol of the ftmds. In 

statute. Wilheimi v. Wade, 65 Mo. 39. 

of aa o xyi e wi truBt. In statute. State v, Gamhs, 68 Mo. 289; 

Harvey v, Dutcher, 15 Mo. 90; Chew v, Brumagen, 13 Wall. 497; 
Reade v. Waterhonse, 52 N. Y. $87 ; Considerant v. Brisbane, 22 N- 
Y. 389; Greenfield v, Mass. Mat Ins. Co., 47 N. Y. 430; People v. 
Norton, 9 N. Y. 177; I^reutz v, Livingston, 15 Cal. 344; Fox v. 
Minor, 33 Cal. 31 1 ; Winters v. Rush, 34 Cal. 36 ; Robbins 9. I>ev> 
erell, 20 Wis. 143. 

of the ohuroh. In promissory note. Hays v. Critchler, S4 lo^ 



TBY. 
TTJBB. 
TUMUI/rS. 
TUBIT. 



260. 

the iflsues. In record. Reagan v. Irwin, 25 Ark. 86. 

In contract. Washing Machine Co. v, Earle, 3 Wall. Jr. 321. 
In statute. State v, Perkins, 42 N. H. 465. 

out. In statute, Carson v, R. Co., 3$ Cal. 325. 

— out of doon. In statute. Sower's Appeal, 89 Pa. St. 181. 

in to deliver. In charter-party. Robertson v. Jackson* 3 C 

B. 413. 
regular . In charter-party. Hudson v, Qementson, 18 C B. 213; 

Lawson i^.^Bumess, i H. & C. 396. 

State V. Haight, 30 N. J. (L.) 443 ; 32 N. J. (L.) 449- 

oompany. State v. Haight, 30 N. J. (L.) 443 ; 32 N. J. (L.) 449^ 

road. Northampton Bridge v. London, etc., R. Co., 6 M. ft W. 

428 ; Reg. V, East, etc., R. Co., 5 El. & Bl. 466 ; State v. Haight, 30 N. 
J. (L.) 443 ; 32 N. J. (L.) 449 ; Com. v. Wilkinson, 16 Pick. 175 ; Neff 
V, Mooresville, etc.. Road Co., 66 Ind. 279. 

TWEirnr-FOUB. months. In bond, Hopkins v. Chambers, 7 Monr. 262. 



TUBITFIEK 



TWICE. 



— in jeopardy. In constitution. State v. Moor, Walker* 134 (12 
Am. Dec. 541) ; Com. v. Purchase, 2 Pick. 521 (13 Am. Dec 4P); 
People V. Stanley, 47 Cal. 1 14 ; People v. Hinckler, 48 Cal. 331. 

— straw. In statute. Rheimer v. Maxwell, 3 Blatchf. 124. 



TJlTABIiE. 



TWISTED. — 

ULLAGE. Cory v, Boyleston, 107 Mass. 140. 

TJLTBA. vires Miners' Ditch Co. v, Zellerbach, 37 Cal. 543; McPherson 

V, Foster, 43 Iowa, 48. 

Ga£^ V. Hartford Bridge Co., 42 Conn. 143. 

to agree as to the damages. In statute. Todd v. Austin. 34 

Conn. 78. 

XTNASCEBTAIKED* duties. . Moke v, Barney, 5 BlatchC 274. 

ITIfAVOIDABLE. aooident. Jn statute, Flynn v. R. Co., 40 Cal. 14 ; Marble v. 

Hinds, 67 Me. 203. 

aooident, necessity or distress of weather. In statute. 

U. S. V. Hayward, 2 Gall. 505. 

— accidents. In biU of lading. Fowler v. Davenport, 21 Tex. 626; 
Marsh v. Blythe, i McCord, 360; Marsh v. Bljrthe, i N. &Mc. 170; 
Central Line v, Lowe, 50 Ga. 509; Maghee v. Camden, etc, R. Cdi 
45 N. Y. 514 (6 Am. Rep. 124). 
In contract. McGehee v. Hill, 4 Port. 170 (29 Am. Dec. 277). 



UNA VOIDABLE. 365 UND UE: 

UNAVOIDABLE — Continued 

oaAualty. In lease. Wells v. Castles. 3 Gray, 323. 

dangenof the riTer. Jn bill of laeUttg. The Favorite. 2 Bias. 502. 

dangers of the riTer, navigation and lire. In bill of lading. 

Hays V. Kennedy, 41 Pa. St 378 ; The Ocean Wave, 3 Biss. 317. 

dangers of navigation. In bill of lading. Hays v. Kennedy, 41 

Pa. St. 378. 

dangers of the river whieh are . In bill of lading. Gordon v. 

Bachanan. $ Yerg. 71 ; Johnson v. Frear, 4 Yeig. 48. 

other aooident. In statute. Dixon v. U. S., i Brock. 187. 

unuOBH. person. In statute. Basnett v. Moxon, L. R., 20 Eq. Cas. 102. 

UBTCBBTAIN. interest. In statute. Woode v. Lake, reported in Wood v. Lead- 
better, 13M. &W. 838. 

or oontingent demands. In statute. Preach v. Morse, 2 Gray, 

III. 

UirOOirEBOIiLED. and irresponsible direction. In deed. Tabor v. Brooks, 

10 Ch. Dir. 203. 

Mills V. Stoddard, 8 How. 345. 

In statute. Newbur3rport Turnpike Co. v. Easton R. Co., 23 Pick. 
326; Boston, etc., R. Co. v. Mayor, 3 Alien, 108. 

and satgeot to. In deed. Taylor v. Mayor, 93 Pa. St. 42 ; Morris' 

Appeal, 88 Pa. St 450 ; Samuel v. Peyton, 88 Pa. St. 465 ; Merri- 
man v. Grove, 90 Pa. St. 78. 

existlTig laws. In statute. U . S. z/. Wigglesworth, 2 Story, 373. 

sooh yearly hiring. In statute. King v. Inhabitants, 9 B. & C. 



183. 

ITNDSBSTAN DIN O. Camp v. Weed, 25 Conn. 529 ; Hill v. Fox, 4 Hurl, k N. 362. 

XJin)EB8TOOD. it is . Ik contract. Higginson v. Weld, 14 Gray. 165. 

UXULVEBTAKE. we as solioitors . Li contract. Burrell v. Jones, 3 B. & Aid. 47. 

XXirDEBTAKING. Thompson v. Blanchard, 3 N. Y. 335. 

ht statute. Reg. v. West, i Den. C. C. 258 ; Reg. v. Joyce, 10 Cox C. 
C. 100 ; Reg. V. Deed, 2 Moody, 62 ; Reg. v. Chambers, L. R., i C. C. 
R. 341 ; Crardner v. R. Co., L. R., 2 Ch. App. 201 ; Doe v. R Co., 2 

Q. a 363. 

fbr the payment of money. In statute. Reg. v. Chambers, L. 

R., I C. C. R. 341. 

inrDXBTOOK In statute. Corbett v. Packington, 6 B. A C. 273. 

U JN iiJWSRMINBD. prooeeding. Li statute. Cole v. Miller, 32 Miss. 90. 

UHl > lViDJgl> > Re Wellington, 16 Pick. 87. 

In statute. King v. Inhabitants, i B. & C. 379. 

saleable . In statute. Lord Fitzharding v. Pritchell, 8 B. & S. 

227. 

ixiflnenoe. Bo3rse v. Roseborough, 6 H. L. Cas. 2. 

means. In statute. Re Plews, 6 Q. B. 847. 

or unreasonable preference. In statute. Re Catterham R. Co., 



I C. a (N. S.) 410 ; re Ransome, i C. B. (N. S.) 437 ; 4 C. B. (N. S.) 
136; re Oxlade, i C. B. (N. S.) 454; re Marriott, i C. B. (N. S.) 502. 

without influenoe or compulsion. In deed. Tubbs v. Gale- 
wood, 26 Ark. 128. 



' UNEQUIVOCAL. 366 UNLESS. 

UKEQUIVOCAL. Spencer v. Coit, 89 Pa. St 314. 

X71IEZECUTSD. writ. In statute. State if. Hamilton, 1 Harr. 154. 

UNFAIBLY. and aeoretiy oomputed. InpUa. Kerr v. Force. 3 Cranch C. 

C. 8. 

UinnNISHBD. buainess. In constitution. Foster v. Daniels, 39 Ga. 39. 

UNIFOBM. In constitution. State v. Tappan, 29 Wis. 664 ; Kelley v. SUte, 6 Ohio 

St. 269. 

in their operation. In statute. People v. Coleman, 4 Cal. 46; 

People V. Judge, 17 Cal. 547 ; Geebrick v. State, 5 Iowa, 491 ; Mo 
Cormick v. Rusch, 15 Iowa, 127 ; McAnnick v. Mississippi, etc., R. 
Co., 20 Iowa. 338. 

laws. In constitution. Golden v. Prince, 3 Wash. C. C. 313. 

rule. In statute. Peay v. Little Rock, 32 Ark. 31. 

taxation shall be • In constitution. Att'y-Gen. v. Winnebago, 

etc., R. Co., II Wis. 35 ; Kneeland v. City of Milw2uikee, 15 Wis. 
454; Weeks tf. City of Milwaukee, 10 Wis. 243 ; State v. Hastings, 
12 Wis. 48; Knowlton v. Supervisors, 9 Wis. 410; Exchange Blc 
V. Hines, 3 Ohio St. i. 

UJimOUMBERKn . lot. Borrowe v. Milbank, 5 Abb. Pr. 28. 

UNXNTENTIONAI.. Brown v. Kendall, 6 Cush. 294. 

UNION. In statute, Mackgulleth v. Pool, L. R., 4 Q. B. 592; Reg. v. Priest Hut- 

ton, 17 Q. B. 60. 

UNITED WSIlTBB. onrrenoy. In indictment. State v. Gasting, 23 La. Ann. 

609. 

UNIVEBBirr. In statute. Dowling College v. Purchas, 3 B. & Adol. 169. 

UN JUSTLT. and tinlkirly attempted. In plea. Kerr v. Force, 3 Cranch C. 

C. 8. 

UNKNOWN. owner. Oliver v. Robinson, 58 Ala. 47. 

other persons to the Jury . In indictment. Queen v. Thompson, 

16 Q. B. 832. 

value and contents . In hill of lading. The California, 2 Sawy. 

12 ; The Colombo, 3 Blatchf. 521 ; Clark v. Barnwell, 12 How. 272; 
Wentworth v. The Realm, 16 La. Ann. 18 ; Fassett v. Ruark, 3 La. 
Ann. 694; Lebeau v. General Steam Nav. Co., L. R., 8 C. P. 88. 

UNLAWFUL. State v. Erskine, 66 Me. 358 ; Com. v. Hunt, 4 Mete. 123. 

In indictment. U. S. v. Thompson, 6 McLean, 56. 

game. In statute. Com. v. Golding, 3 Mete. 130; Com. v. 

Stowell, 9 Mete. 574; Vicaro v. Com., 5 Dana, 584 ; Ervine v. Com.» 
5 Dana, 216. 

game or sport. In statute. Com. v. Tilton, 8 Mete 232. 

stmottire. Atlee v. Packet Co., 21 Wall. 389. 



UNLAWFULLT. In affidavit. Re Coleman, 15 Blatchf. 417. 

In indictment. State v. Robbins, 66 Me. 324 ; State v. Vermont, et&, 
R. Co., 27 Vt. 103. 

In statute. Wade v. McMillen, 29 Mo. 18. 

kill. In statute. Taylor v. Newman, 4 B. & S. 9a 

In deed. Legh v. Lillie, 6 Hurl. & N. 167. 

In statute. Manning v. Keenan, 72 N. Y. 45. 

it appears. In statute. Ramsdill v. Wentworth, 106 Mass. 39a 



UNMARRIED. zffj UNTRUE 

UNMABBIED. In will Re Sanders, L. R., i £q. Cas. 676 ; Radford v. Willis, L. 

R., 12 Eq. Cas. no; Clark v. Calls, 9 H. L. Cas. 601 ; Doe v, Raw-^ 
ding, 2 B. & Aid. 452 ; Radford v, Williams, L. R., 7 Ch. App. 7. 

female. In statute. Kirk v. Long, 7 U. C. C. P. 363; An- 
derson V, Rannie, 12 U. C. C. P. 536. 

XTNOOCUPIESD. In insurance policy. Albion Lead Works v. Williamsburgh City Ins. 

Co., 2 Fed. Rep. 479; Harrington v, Fitchburgh Ins. Co., 124 Mass. 
126; Ashworth v. Building, etc., Ins. Co., 112 Mass. 442; Wait v. 
Ins. Co., 13 Hun, 371 ; Gibbs v, Ins. Co., 13 Hun, 611 ; Cook v^ 
Continental Ins. Co., 70 Mo. 610 (35 Am. Rep. 438); Corregan v, 
Connecticut Ins. Co., 122 Mass. 268. 

In statute. State v, Reinhardt, 31 N. J. (L.) 218. 

inSTPAID. taxes. In statute, Sheboygan Uo. v. City of Sheboygan, 54. 

Wis. 415. 

XTN-QUAUFIED. opinion. People v, Reynolds, 16 Cal. 128. 

ITNBBASONABIiE. delay. Clispham v. Vertue, 5 Q. B. 270; Illinois, etc., R. 

Co. V, McClellan, 54 111. 58. 

searoheB. In constitution. City of Clinton v. Phillips. 58 IlL 

102. 

XOrBEGISTEBED. ' oompanies. In statute. Bowes v. Directors, 1 1 H. L. Cas. 

389. 

UWBATISFIBD. judgment. In statute. Ex parte Purdy, 9 C, R 203. 

UNHEAWOBTHY. In insurance policy, Hoff v. Marine Ins. Co., 8 Johns. 163 (5 Am. 

Dec. 331). ♦ 

uxioOLD. oonimentarieBonhand. In will, Honet/. Kent, 6 N. Y. 374. 

irN'SOuxiU. In warranty. Kiddell v, Burnard, 9 M. & W. 670. 

mind. Jenkins v, Jenkins, 2 Dana, 102 (26 Am. Dec. 457). 



persons of mind. In statute. Freed v. Brown, 55 Ind. 310. 

UKTENANTABLB. In lease. Kip v, Newman, 52 N. Y. 542. 

so injured ♦ ♦ ♦ as to be . In statute, Suydam z^. Jackson,. 

54 N. Y. 450. 
Webster v, French, 12 111. 302 ; Rex v, Stevens, 5 East, 244. 
In assijg^nment. Kendall v, Kingsley, 120 Mass. 94. 
In insurance policy. Isaacs v. Ins. Co., L. R. 5 Ex. 296. 

In order of fourt, Webster v. French, 12 111. 302 ; Thomas v. Douglas^ 
2 Johns. Cas. 226. 

— tlie first day of Maroh. In contract, Houghmont v. Boisan-^ 
antin, 5 N. J. (Eq.) 315. 

In statute. Bellhouse v, Mellor, 4 Hurl. & N. 120. 

otherwise direoted. In constitution. State v, Clendenin, 24 

Ark. 87. 

the fldl. Abel v. Alexander, 45 Ind. 523. 

the summer. Abel v, Alexander, 45 Ind. 523. 

the first day of January. In bank charter. People v. Walker^ 



17 N. Y. 502. 

Simpson v, Lewthwaite, 3 B. & Adol. 231. 

and amongst. Casterton v, Sutherland, 9 Ves. Ch. 445. 

In insurance policy. Fowkes v. Ins. Co., 3 B. & S. 925. 

in any respeot . Lt insurance application. Wilkenson v. Union 

Miit. Life Ins. Co., 2 Dill. 570. 



UNUSUAL. 



368 



VSK 



UfiUBUAL. 
UP. 

UFHOIJ). 
UPON. 



TIB. 
XTSAQB. 



XJBB. 



: number. Pike v. Witt» 104 Mass. 595. 

the oveek. Infiateni. Buckley v. Blackwell, 10 Ohio. 508. 

and repair. Levy v,, Dyess, 3 Cent. L. J. 221. 

Miles V, Barrows, 122 Mass. 579. 

In statute, Reg. v. InhabitaDts, 7 Q- B. 525 ; ^ueea v. Inhabitants, 
7 Q* B. 534; Tyne Keelman v. Davison/ 16 C. B. (N.S.) 616; Queen 
V, Humphrey, 10 Ad. & Ell. 361. 

any repreoentation aa to charaoter. In statute. Haslock v. 

Ferguson, 7 Ad. & Ell. 94. 

oondition. Sohier v. Trinity Church. 109 Mass. 19. 

eaoh payment. In contract. Scott v. Parker, i Q. B. 809. 

Mi admlMJan* In statute. Queen v. Humphrey, loAdftBL 

335- 

or aoroaa any atieet. In statwU. Chicago, etc, R. Co. v. Dun- 
bar, 100 111. 137. 

Buoh payment. In contracts Coartright v. Deeds, 37 Iowa, 503. 

the p re e o n t a ti on of the d e e dL In contract . Welch v. Matthews. 

98 Mass. 131. 

the trial In statute. Folkard v. R Co, L/ R., 8 C. P. 470. 

agreed . In treaty, Hylton v. Brown, i Wash. C. C. 353. 

against . In power of attorney. Hunt v. Chamberiain, 3 Halst 

336 (14 Am. Dec. 427). 

Barnard v, Kellogg, 10 Wall 383 ; Lowry v. Read, 3 Brewst 45^* 
Dickinson v. Gay, 7 Allen, 29.. 

and praotioe of war. In statute. Mauimn v. Smith, 8 R. 1. 222. 

aooording to oomroon -^-*-. In statute. U. S. v. Pings, 4 Fed. Rep. 

.714. 
Hutchins v. Haywood, 50 N. H. 491 ; Heaston v. Comm'rs. 20 Ind. 

398. 
Li deed. Minter v. Williams, 4 Ad. & EIL 251. 
In statute. Harwoodz/. R. Co., 2 B. & S. 214; West Riding R. Co. 

V. Boon, 5 B. & S. 484- 
a port. Snow v. Columbian Ins. Co., 48 Barb. 469 ; 4S N. Y 

624 ; Wheeler v. New York, etc., Ins. Co., 35 N. Y. (S. 0.) 247. 

and Improyement. In will. Fay v. Fay, i Cush.^93. 

any art. In statute. Clark v. Denton, i B. & Ad. loa 

till paid. In note McClellan v. Merris» Kirby, 143.. 

change in . In insurance policy. Cannell v. Phoenix Ins. Co., 

59 Me. 582. 

for my . In bill of exchange. Lloyd v. Sigoumey, 3 Younge k 

J. 228 ; 8 B. A C. 633. 

for the of. In deed. Stockbridge Iron Co. v. Hudson IronC-o^ 

107 Mass. 320. 

fbr the of said works. In deed. Comstock v. Johnson, 46 N. 

Y. 615. 

for the of the proprietors of lands. In statute. Wademan v. 

Albany 9l Susquehanna R. R., 51 N. Y. 568. 

Ibr the thereof In contract. Hickox v. Lowe. 10 Cal. 207. 

fbr the of their respeotive roads, ht stattUe. Troy, etc R- 

Co. V. Boston, etc., R. Co., 86 N. Y. 107. 



(fSE. 369 USV/tL. 

USE — Continued. 

light to the thing patented. In statute. Wilson v, Rousseau, 

I Blatchf. 53. 

make, or put in praotioe. In statute. Walton v, Lavater, 8 

C. B. (N. S.) 187. 

the of the timber. In deed, Clark v. Way» 1 1 Rich. 621. 

USED. In railroad ticket. Auerbach v. New York Cent R. Co., 25 Alb. L. J. 

482 ; Evans v. St. Louis, etc., R. Co., 14 Cent. L. J. 481. 

in navigating the waters of this state. In statute. Russell v. 

The Elk, 6 Mo. 552 ; Noble v. The Anthony, 12 Mo. 262. 

fbr nnlawftil gaming. In statute. Com. v, Statel, 7 Allen, 305. 

oooupied and exgoyed. In deed. Langley 7/. Hammond, L. 

R., 3 Ex. 161. 

drain for the oonveyanoe of water. In statute. Queen v. 

Bodkin, 3 El. & El. 276. 

heretofore . In constitution. Sheppard v. Steele, 43 N. Y. 52. 

to be as cabinet warerooms. In iease. Bmgman v. Noyes, 6 

Wis. 3. 

USEFUL. In patent law. Cox v. Griggs, i Biss, 362 ; Lowell v. Lewis, i Mason, 

182; Bedford v. Hunt, 1 Mason, 302; Whitney z/. Emmett, Baldw. 
303 ; Dickinson v. Hall, 14 Pick. 217 ; Winans v. Schenectady, etc., 
R. Co., 2 Blatchf. 279; Kneass v. Schuylkill Bk., 4 Wash. C. C. 9; 
Roberts v. Ward, 4 McLean, 565. « 

art. CordiningT/. Burden, 15 How. 267. 

inyention. In statute. Lowell v. Lewis, i Mason, 182; Bedford 

V. Hunt, I Mason, 302. 

to oorporations. In statute. Badger v. Paper Co., 70 111. 302. 



In deed. Martin v. O'Bannon, 35 Ark. 62 ; Connor v. Abbott, 35 Ark. 

365. 
luplea. Nichols v. Ramsel, 2 Mod. 280. 

and oustomary. Carter v, Phila. Coal Co., 77 Pa. St. 286. 

and ordinary oourse of business. In statute, Walbrun v. 

Babbitt, 16 Wall. 577 ; Harris v. Boggs, 5 Blackf. 489. 

oertifioates. In stipulation. Bovill v. Hadley, 17 C. B. (N. S.) 



436. 

— olanses. Bozon v. Farlow, i Mer. Ch. 459. 

— oonrse of trade. Coddington v. Bay, 20 Johns. 637 (11 Am. 
Dec. 342). 

— covenants. In deed. Hart v. Hart, 30 W. R. 8 ; Hampshire v. 



Wickens, 7 Ch. Div. 555 ; Wilson v. Wood, 17 N. J. (Eq.) 217 ; Car- 
ter V. Denman, 23 N. J. (L.) 260. 

— covenants of warranty. In bond. McAlister v. Moye, 30 Miss. 
258. 

— dispatch. In contract. Aschroft v. Colliery Co., L. R., 9 Q. B. 



540; Kearson v. Pearson. 7 Hurl. & N. 386. 

— high-water mark. Teschemacker v. Thompson, 18 Cal. 11. 

— or necessary course of business. Madison, etc., Plank-Road 
Co. V. Watertown, etc., Co., 5 Wis. 183. 

— place of abode. In statute. Charlton County v. Moberly, 59 



Mo. 228 ; Gadsden v. Johnson, i Nott & M. 89. 



47 



1 



USUAL. 



370 



UTTERLY, 



XJBUAIi ^ Continued. 



XJSUAIiLT. 



XJ8TJBPSD. 



U8UBY. 



UTENSILS. 



UTILITY'. 



UTTEB. 



— plaoe of busineM. In statute, Biodgett v. Alley, 4 Neb. 25; 
Palmer v, Kelleher, 1 1 1 Mass. 320. 

— place of religiouA wonhip. In statute. Smith v, Barrett, L 
R.. 6 Q. a 35. 

— projeotioiifl. In deed, Linzee v. Mixer, loi Mass. 512. 
-- rates. In statute, Ilutton v, Schell, 6 Blatchf. 53. 

— stopping-plaoe. R. Co. v, Flagg, 43 111. 364. 
terms. In order, Thompsott v. Bower, 9 C. R (N. S.) 286; 



Bettafi^h v, Dearden, i Mc. & Yonge, 106. 
dwelling-houee or plaoe of abode. In statuu. 



Hyslop V. 



Happock, 5 Ben. 447. 

In statute. Queen v, Randall, 4 El. & Bl. 565. 

perfbrmed. In statute, Reg. v, Plunkett^ 21 U. C. Q. R 536. 

reeideB. In statute, Lochnane v, Lochnane# 78 Ry. 469. 

sold. In statute. Queen v. Wood, L. R., 4 Q. B. 559 ; Qneeo v. 

Kennett, L. R., 4 Q- B. 565.- 

I>ower. In insurance policy. City Fire Ins. Co. v. Corliss, 21 



Wend. 367 (34 Am. Dec, 258). 

burnt by i)Ower. In insurance policy, Drinkwater v. Londoo 

Assn., 2 Wils. 363. 

lose whioh may happen by means of an power. In insurance 

policy, * Barton v. Home Ins. Co., 42 Mo. 157. 

White V, Friedlander, 35 Ark. 52 ; Henry v. Bank of Salina, $ Hill, 523; 
Wilkie V, Roosevelt, 3 Johns. Cas. 206 ; Newton v, Wilson, 31 Ark. 
484; Hogg V, Ruffner, i Black, 115; Camp i/. Bates, 11 Conn. 487; 
Gaart/. Louisville Banking Co., 11 Bush, 180; Readtf. Coale,4lnd. 
383 ; Lesley v, Johnson, 41 Barb. 359; Woodruff v, Hurson, 32 Barb. 
557 ; Bank of U. S. v, Waggener, 9 Peters, 378 ; Scott v. Floyd. 9 
Peters, 418 ; Lafeyette Bk. v. State Bk., 4 McLean, 208. 

fbr the malrlng of paper. In statute. Attorney-General v. 

Gibbs, 3 Younge A J. 339. 

fluming . In statute, Bevitt v, Crandall, 19 Wis. 582 ; Humph- 
rey V, Taylor, 4 North W. Rep. 93. 

In statute. Seymour i/. Osborne, 11 Wall. 516. 

purpose of , In statute, Rogers .«/. Driver, 16 Q. R 103. 

In statute. State v. Homer, 48 Mo. 520; Rex v, Cusplan, i Jebb, 210; 
Rex V, Palmer, i Russ. & Ry. 72; U. S. v. Nelson, i Abb. (U. S) 135; 
Perkins v. People, 27 Mich. 386; Paige v. People, 3 Abb. App.Dec 

439. 

loss. In bond, Ins. Co. v, Gossler, 6 Otto, 645 ; Ins. Co. v. 

Duval, 8 S. & R. 138. 

or publish. In statute. Rex v, Shukard, i Russ. ft Ry. 201. 

or put off. In statute, Reg. v. Welsby. Temp, ft M. 409. 

pass, publish or selL In statute, U. S. v. Nelson, i Abb. (U. 

S.) 137. 

UTTEBEB. oommon of oounterfeit ooin. In statute, Murray v. Com., 13 



UTTERLY. 



Mete. 516. 
void. Lt statute. Lane v. Chapman, 1 1 Ad. ft Ell. 979. 



VACANCIES. 



371 



VAL UE. 



VACANCIB8. In constitution. People v, Gieen, 2 Wend. 273 ; People v, Forquer, i 

I1L7X- 

that may happen doling the reoees of the senate. In statute. 

Re Farrow, 3 Fed. Rep. 113. 

Harrison v, Simonds, 44 Conn. 318; State z/. Messmore, 14 Wis. 193; 
Johnston v, Wilson, 2 N. H. 202 (9 Am. Dec. 50) ; People v. Whit- 
man, 10 Cal. 38 ; People v. Wells, 2 Cal. 223 ; People v, Bissell, 49 
Cal. 407. 

In constitution. State v, Seay, 64 Mo. 91 ; State v, Emerson, 39 Mo. 80. 

that may happen* In constitution, Walsh v. Com., 89 Pa. St 



VAGANC7. 



VAOAITF. 



VACATED. 



VACATIOir. 



VAI-IDITY. 



419. 
Stocking V, State, 7 ind. 326 : State v, Boecker, 56 Mo. 17 : State z/. 
Irwin, 5 Nev. in. 

and unoooupied. In insurance policy, Dawson v. Am. Cent. 

Ins. Co., I Mo. (App.) 317 ; American Ins. Co. v, Padfield, 78 111. 167 ; 
Hermann v, Ins. Co., 44 N. Y. (S. C.) 444 ; Whitney v, Ins. Co., 
72 N. Y. 117; Meaghan v, Ins. Co., 24 Hun, 58 ; Corrigan v, Con- 
necticut Ins. Co., 122 Mass. 228. 

and unoooupied land. In city charter, Gillette v. City of 



Hartford, 31 Conn. 351. 

landfl. In deed. Marshall v, Bompart, 18 Mo. 84. 

In statute. State v. Arledge, 2 Bailey, 401 (23 Am. Dec. 145) ; State 
V, Bevers, 86 N. C. 589. 

or unoooupied. In insurance policy, Corrigan v. Connecticut 

Ins. Co., 122 Mass. 298. 

or unoooupied lots. In statute, Tigh v, Colquette, 21 Mo. 233. 

In insurance policy. Sleeper v. New Hampshire Ins. Co., 56 N. H. 
401 ; CumminsV. Agricultural Ins. Co., 6^ N. Y. 260 (33 Am. Rep. 
III). 

hisoffloe. In statute, Thornton v, Boyd, 25 Wis. 598. 

U. S. V, Adams, 6 Wall. 105. 

Taylor v. State, 59 Ala. 19. 

tn statute, Boulo v. State, 49 Ala. 22. 

involving the of a statute. In statute. City of Cain v, Bross, 

99 IH. 523. 
artiole. In statute. State v, Pottmeyer, 33 Ind. 402 (5 Am. Rep. 



224). 

seourity. In statute. Guardians v, Owens, L. R., 8 Ex. 37. 

thing. In statute. Gibbons v. People, 33 111. 442 ; State v, 

Tomlin, 5 Dutch. 13, State z^. Fletcher, 6 Vroom, 453. 

In indictment, Matthews z/. State, 55 Ala. 70; Rezt/. Robinson, 2 
Leach, 479. 

coins, medalB, gems and oriental stones and other things. 

In will. Cavendish v. Cavendish, i Cox. Ch. 77 ; i Brown Ch. 467. 

among the ^papers. In statute, Winstead v. Bowman, 68 N. C. 

170. 

* Hunt V, Smith, 9 Kas. 137 ; Queen v, Capel, 12 Ad. & Ell. 414 ; Roch- 
ester V, Chester, 3 N. H. 359. 

In statute, Chidester v. State, 25 Ohio St. 433 ; Troy Iron Co. v, 
Winslow, 45 Barb. 231 ; Lawrence v, Boston, 119 Mass. 126; Scott 
V, St. Paul, etc., R. Co., 25 Ohio St. 433. 



VALUE. 



372 



VERDICT. 



VAImTJIR _ Continued. 

of the ship or TMBeL In statute. Wilson v, Dickson, 2 E & 



VALUED. 



VABIAKGB. 



A : I ( w 



:^ : I ( w 



vEnr. 

VEND. 

VKJiDEJB . 

VENDOB. 

VERDICT. 



Aid. 14. 

— of the land. In carparaOan charter. Pacific R. R. v, Chrystal. 
25 Mo. 544. 

» of the propert7 takea. In statute, Dilworth v. McKelvey, 30 
Mo. 149. 

— of the tenements. In statute, Elston v. Rose, L. R.. 4 Q. B. 4- 
of thepraiMrty. InstaiuU. Attorney-General f'. Sef- 



ton, 2 H. A C. 370. 

appraiaed . In statute.^ Wilson v. Maxwell, 2 Blatch£ 321; 

Grinnell v, Lawrence* x Blatchf. 347. 

oaah . In statute. Huntington v. Central Pacific R. Co., 2 

Sawyer, 503. 

ftir reoei^ed. hi assignment. Chantauque Bk. v. Risiey, 18 

N. Y, 37a 

In contract. Cheney «. Cook, 7 Wis. 413 ; Dey v. Elmore, 4 Wis. 190: 
Osgood V. Bringolt 33 .Iowa, 265 ; Clark v. Loomis, 5 Duer, 468; 
Connecticut, etc., Ins. Co. v. Cleveland, etc., R. Co., 41 Barb. 9: 
Watson V. McLaren, 19 Wend. 557; Miller v. Cook, 23 N. Y. 49s; 
Caldwell v, McKain, 2 Nott & McC. 555 ; Gamwell v. Moselj, n 
Gray. 173. 

In deed, Jackson v. Alexander, 3 Johns. 484 (3 Am. Dec. 517). 

market : In contract. Orchard v. Simpson, 2 C. B. (N. S.) 30a 

true nature and . In statute. Williams v. African Steam Ca, i 

HurL A N. 30a 

true and aotnal oaah . In inturance policy. Wolfe v. Harvard 

Ins. Co., 7 N. Y. 583. 

yearly of the widow'a dower. In statute. Riley f^. Clammoigaiu 

15 Mo. 332. 

at as under. In insurance policy. Wilson v. Nelson, 5 E & S. 



354. 
Smith V. State, 7 Tex. (App.) 382. 

produotiona. In statute. Rex v, Hodges, i M. ft M. 341. 

In statute. Camp v. Rogers, 44 Conn. 291 ; Duckwall v. City of New 

Albany, 25 Ind. 283. 
ibr the tranaportation of paaaengera. In statute. Whittaker 

V, Eighth Ave. R. R., 51 N. Y. 295. 
need aolely ibr the oonveyanoe of any gooda or borden in 



the oourae of trade. In statute. Speak v. Powell, L. R., 9 Ex. 35. 

publio . In city ordinance. City of St. Louis v. Woodni£t 71 

Mo. 92. 

North Noonday Mining Co. v. Orient Mining Co^ x Fed. Rep. 522 ; 
Eureka Consol. Mining Co. v. Richmond Mining Co., 4 Sawy. 303. 

'in deed. Winter v. Williams, 4 Ad. ft Ell. 251. 

In statute. Hudson Iron Co. v, Alger, 54 N. Y. X73. 

Rutland v, Brister, 53 Miss. 683. 

Otis V. Spencer, 8 How. Pr. 171 ; State «. Nelson, 26 Ind. 366 ; Shaw 
V. State, 2 Tex. (App.) 491. 

In statute, Prew v. Squire, 10 C. B. 915; McCullogh v. Allen, 10 
Kas. 150; Bearce z/. Bowker, 115 Mass. 129. 



VERDICT. 373 VI. 

VKUDICT — Continued. 

---^ agaJTiHt law. In statute, Emerson v. Santa Clara Co., 40 Cal. 

545. 
or jadgment. In statute. White v. Hunt, i Halst. 415. 

general . Settle v, Alison, 8 Ga. 201. 

imxnediataly alter the , In statute. Wood v, Grimwood, 10 B. 

& C. 700. 
TISBIFf. DeWitt v, Hosmer, 3 How. Pr. 284 ; Ashley v. Wright, 19 Ohio St. 391. 

VEBimjOir. In statute. Boring v. Lawrence, i Blatchf . 607. 

Cramer v, Noonan, 4 Wis. 239. 

otdeote of and taste. In will. Bridgman v. Ld. Fitzgerald, 43 

L. T. (N. S.) 408. 

The Floating Elevator, 8 Ben. 556 ; Pendleton v, Franklin, 7 N. Y. 508 ; 
The Hendrick Hudson, 3 Ben. 419; Hood v, Deghton Bridge, 3 
Mass. 263. 

In statute. Hamilton v. Stow, 5 B. & Aid. 650 ; Blanford v, Morrison, 
15 Q. B. 730; Fraleck v, Betts, 13 Hun. 632 ; Lambert v. R Co., 70 
N. Y. 104 ; Pendleton v. Franklin, 7 N. Y. 508 ; Tisdell v. Combe, 7 
Ad. & EIL 797; Northrop v. The Pilot, 6 Oreg. 297; U. S. v. An Open 
Boat, 5 Mason, 120 ; Chaffe v. Ludeling, 27 La. Ann. 607 ; Crawford 
V, Collins, 4S Barb. 269 ; Com. v. Francis, Thach. C. C. 240 ; The 
Hezekiah Baldwin, 8 Ben. $66; King v, Greenway, 71 N. Y. 413; 
Walsh V. New York Dry Dock Co., ^^ N. Y. 448 ; The Manhattan. 
2 Ben. 88. 

wrecked in the United States. In statute. U. S. v. Brig Vic- 
toria Perez, 8 Ben. 109. • 

deeoription of used in navigation* In statute. The Mac. 46 

L. T. (N. S.) 907. 

of the XToited States. In statute. Hicks v. Williams, 17 Barb. 

523 ; The Mary Merritt. 2 Biss. 381 ; The Merritt, 17 Wall. 582. 

of whatever desoriptiony used in river or inland naviga- 
tion. In statute. The Mamie, 5 Fed. Rep. 820. 

steam . In statute. Walker v. Evans, 2 El. & El. 359. 

In statute, Covedale v, Charlton, 3Q. B. Div. 376; Nutter v. Bd.,4Q. 

B. Div. 375. 
go to and in. In wiU, Wood v. Denny, i Biss. 73. 

Tayloe v, Gould, 10 Barb. 388 ; Sheridan v. House, 4 Abb. App. Dec. 
218. 

In statute. Directors v. May, L. R., 7 H. L. 283. 

In will. Richardson v. Power, 19 C. B. (N. S.) 788 ; re Edmonson, L. 
R, 5 Eq. Cas. 389; Simpson v. Peach, L. R., 16 Eq. 208. 

in possession. Holliday v. McMillan, 79 N. C. 31 5. 

interest. In will. Greenhaigh v. Bates, L. R., 2 P. & D. 47. 

remainder. Poor v, Considine, 6 Wall. 458 ; Cuyler v. Ferrill, 

I Abb. (U. S.) 1691 

right. Morton v. Nebraska, 21 Wall. 660 ; Parmalee v. Laurence, 

48 IlL 331 ; Marshall v. King, 24 Miss. 85. 

In statute, Reg. v. Peters, 6 El. & Bl. 230. 

removal. In statute. Reg. v. Mayor, 7 El. & Bl. 46a 

et armis. In indictment. Territory v, McFarlane, i Mart. 211 

(5 Am. Dec. 706). 



VICAR. 



374 



VOID. 



VICAB. 
VldOUS. 



In statuU. Pinder v, Barr, 4 El. & Bl. 1 14. 

In insuranci policy, Haley v. Dorchester Ins. Co., I3 Gray, $45. 

exoesalTely oondnot In statute. Hoshall v. Hoshall, 51 Md.72. 



VldOUSNESS. In Htt of lading. Rhodes v, Louisville R. Co., 9 Bush, 688. 

VICnrAIiIiEB. Tyson v. Smith, 9 Ad. & Ell. 407. 

VICrnJ A TiTiWlfl. In statute. Mayor v. Davis, 6 W. & S. 278. 



ViCTl'UAIiS. 

VIDBUGBT. 

VIBW. 



VIEWED . 
VIKWXB8. 



•VTTiTiATNOUS. 
VINDIOTIVIB. 
VINOIJS. 

VIOLATE. 

VIOLATIOlf. 



In statute. King v, Hodgkinson, 10 B. & C. 7$. 

Brown v. Berry, 47 111. 175 ; Wilson v. Meant, 3 Ves. Ch. 194. 

the premises* In statute. Wakefield v, Boston, etc., R. Co., 

63 Me. 385. 

immediate and preaenoe of the court. In statute. People v, 

Hackley, 24 N. Y. 74. 

we having . In order, (^een v. Jones, 12 Ad. & Ell. 686. 

Tubbs V. Ogden, 46 Iowa, 134. 

In deed. Waterbach v. Fennell, 7 H. L. Cas. 650. 

In statute, Tilford v. Wallace, 3 Watts, 141 ; Illinois, etc, R. Co. v. 
Williams, 27 III. 48; Toledo, etc., R. Co. v. Spangler, 71 111. 568. 

cities, towns or . In statute. Duggan v. Roche, 2 Hill (Sl C), 

584. 

swap. In libel. Van Vactor v. Walkup, 46 Cal. 130. 

— damages. Chiles v. Drake, 2 Mete. 147. 



VIOIaEECE. 
VIOLENTLT. 



vntTUE: 

VIETUOUS. 
VIS. 

VI8ITOBS. 
VOID. 



liquor. In statute. Adler v. State, 35 Ala. 16; Feldman v. Mor- 
rison, I III. (App.) 460. 

the seventh commandment. Famsworth v. Storrs, 5 Cash. 

412. 

of deoenoy. In statute. Alexander v. Carl, 3 R. 1. 145. 

apparent . In rule of court. Ramsden v. Gray, 7 C. B. 967. 

In statute. Temple v. Kerly, i Man. & G. 904. 

die in the of any law of the State. In insurance policy. Har- 
per z/. Phoenix Ins. Co., 18 Mo. 109; 19 Mo. 507; Overton v. St. 
Louis Ins. Co., 39 Mo. 122. 

State V. Wells, 31 Conn. 212 ; State v. Weaver, Busb. (L.) 9. 

In indictment. State v. Blake, 39 Me. 322 ; Com. v. Fogerty, 8 Gray, 
490. 

and routoiuily. In indictment. Com. v. Howe, 2 Allen,. 153. 

and unlawftdly. In statute. U. S. v. Bachelder, 2 Gall. 17. 

by of. Broughton v. Haywood, Phill. (L.) 380. 

luimarried female. In statute. Wood v. State, 48 Ga. 192. 

major. Walker v. Guarantee Ass., 18 Q. B. 278. 



In statute. Ex parte Matanle, 4 B. & Adol. 366. 

Slocum V, Hooker, 13 Barb. 537. 

In deed. Roberts v. Davey, 4 B. & Adol. 672. 

In insurance policy. Williams v. Albany City Ins. Co., 19 Mich. 451. 

In statute. Goldsmid v. Hampton, 5 C. B. (N. S.) to8 ; Ring v. Inhab- 
itants, 8 B. & C. 470 ; Thornton v. Magrath, i Duv. 352 ; Bn^ken- 
ridge v. Ormsby, i J. J. Marsh. 236 (19 Am. Dec. 71); Alexander v. 
Nelson, 42 Ala. 462 ; Van Schaack v. Robbins, 36 Iowa. 201 ; Allis 
V. Billings, 6 Mete. 415 ; Brown v. Brown, 50 N. H. 538 ; Inskeeps^. 
Lecony. i N.