(navigation image)
Home American Libraries | Canadian Libraries | Universal Library | Community Texts | Project Gutenberg | Biodiversity Heritage Library | Children's Library | Additional Collections
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload
See other formats

Full text of "[Agenda]"

s/s 




San Francisco Public Library 

Government information Center 
San Francisco Public Library 
100 Larkin Street, 5th Floor' 
San Francisco, CA 94102 



REFERENCE BOOK 



Not to be taken from the Library 



Digitized by the Internet Archive 

in 2013 



http://archive.org/details/agenda198687sanf 



P30 



A. 



:'C 



-6P 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF. PERMIT APPEALS 
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 8, 1986 
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 



L) MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 

APPEAL NO. V85-309 



ERIC ROSENQUIST, Appellant 

vs . 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



TDenial on November 7, 1985, 
[of rear yard variance sought 
[for property located at 
[3728-30 Taraval Street. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 



(12/28/85 



APPEAL NO. 85-243 



ALBERT AND SIMA BERNZWEIG, Appellant 

vs . 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 85-316 



PETER BULLOCK, Appellant 

vs . 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
FIRE DEPT. DISAPPROVAL 



ROBERT V. MARVIN, Appellant 

vs . 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



[Order to cease violation of the 

[Planning Code dated September 17, 

[1985, for property at 750 Rivera 

[Street. 

[FOR REHEARING TODAY. (10/23/85 



[Denial on November 22, 1985, of 
[permit to alter a building at 
[246 McAllister Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8508333. 
[FOR REHEARING TODAY. 



(1/1/86) 



APPEAL NO. 85-311 



[Imposition of penalty on 
[November 18, 1985, for work 
[done at 39 Collingwood Street 
[APPLICATION NO. 8508575. 
[FOR REHEARING TODAY. 



(12/29/85 



APPEAL NO. 85-335 




JAMES MOORE, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 85-337 



EYER ZELTSER, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



. 



APPEAL NO. 85-306 



TRANG THI THUY TRAN , Appellant 

vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



[Appealing for refund of penalty 
[imposed on December 18, 1985, for 
[work done at 2101 Bryant Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8513242. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/27/86) 



[Imposition of penalty on 

[December 19, 1985, for work done at 

[650-llth Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8512241. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/28/86) 



[Denial on October 29, 1985 of 
[masage establishment permit at 
[1284 Mission Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(12/25/86 



APPEAL NO. 85-334 



EDDIE C. CHEN, dba "CALIFORNIA 99 VIDEO 
EXPRESS," Appellant 

vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



[Denial on December 12, 1985, of 
[mechanical amusement device permit at 
[4355-A California Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/27/86) 



(10) 



APPEAL NO. V85-338 



T.H. WILDENRADT, Appellant 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respor^^^^ & 



'AN 9 
Public us 



TProtesting issuance on December 10, 
[1985, of off-street parking variance 
[sought for property located at 
[563-7th Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/29/86) 



~o 



3 1223 06446 4374 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS JANUARY 8, 1986 



PAGE TWO 



APPEAL NO 



14) 



15) 



(16) 



JORAM ALTMAN, Appellant 
11) vs. 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



V85-324 

"["Denial on November 21, 1985, of 
[rear yard variance sought for 
[property at 42 Woodland Avenue. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(1/11/86; 



APPEAL NO. 85-325 



BARRY KANE, Appellant 
12) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



JOHN DEBOIS, Appellant 
13) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



"[Denial on December 2, 1985, 
[of permit to erect a two-family 
[dwelling at 215 Upper Terrace. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8509730. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(1/11/86] 



APPEAL NO. 85-330 



[Protesting issuance on 

[December 2, 1985, to Jack Kavanagh, 

[permit to erect a structure at 

[61 Saturn Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8510824. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/21/86 



APPEAL NO. 85-339 



CAROL CATTIVERA, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



[Protesting issuance on 

[December 10, 1985 to J. & J. Owens 

[Construction Company, permit to erect 

[a structure at 156 Ellis Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8312187. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/29/86; 



APPEAL NO. 85-340 



DAVID R. PACHECO, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 

[December 12, 1985, to Colonial 

[Construction Company, permit to 

[erect a structure at 

[1000 Corbertt Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8409783. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/1/86) 



APPEAL NO. 85-342 



CHARLES BOLTON, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 

[December 17, 1985, of permit to 

[G/B Contractors to erect a structure 

[at 166 Winfield Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8508258. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/5/86) 



APPEAL NO. 85-344 



ADRIENNE SCHWEITZER, Appellant 
(17) vs. 

DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 
[December 20, 1985, to Torre Winkel 
[of permit to alter a building at 
[3460 Clay Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8510684. 



[FOR HEARING TODAY 



(2/8/86) 



45 SFPL 



50351 SFPL: ECONO JRS 
04/09/04 13J 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 



Jerry E. Berg 
Robert J. McCarthy 
Mattie J. Jackson 
Douglas J. Engmann 
Richard J. Guggenhime 



President 

Vice President 

Commissioner 

Commissioner 

Commissioner 



Doris Levine Official Court Reporter - 456-9899 
Robert H. Feldman Executive Director - 558-4421 



SPECIAL NOTE 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals 
are sent to all parties at least five days 
prior to the date of hearing. In the event 
that a matter is continued to a specific date 
by the presiding officer and announced to the 
parties in the hearing room, no additional 
mailed notice will be sent. Please cell the 
Board office at 558-4421 for scheduling or 
other information during regular business hours 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 
CITY HALL ROOM 154 -A 
TELEPHONE 558-442] 



fe/ ZGlfr6 VO 'OOSIONVad NV 



I 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OrPERMIT APPEALS 
WEDNESDAYS JANUARY 15, 1985 
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 



uOCUMENTS DEPT. 

JAN I 5 1986 

SAN FRANCISCO 
PUBLIC LIBRARY 



MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 



APPEAL NO. 85-234 



GARY KRAY AND LARRY HABEGGER, 

Appellants 
vs. 
PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
PLANNING APPROVAL 



DEPT 
CITY 



[Protesting issuance on 

[September 5, 1985, to Dixon Kelly, 

[permit to demolish a building at 

[221 Filbert Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8502615. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (10/25/85) 



*APPEAL NO. 85-330 



JOHN DEBOIS, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 

[December 2, 1985, to Jack Kavanagh, 

[permit to erect a structure at 

[61 Saturn Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8510824. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (1/21/86) 



APPEAL NO. 85-339 



CAROL CATTIVERA, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 

[December 10, 1985, to J.& J. Owens 

[Construction Company, permit to 

[erect a structure at 

[156 Ellis Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8312187. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (1/29/86) 



APPEAL NO. 85-243 



ALBERT AND SIMA BERNZWEIG, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



[Order to cease violation of the 

[Planning Code dated September 17, 

[1985, for property at 

[750 Rivera Street. 

[FOR REHEARING TODAY. (10/23/85) 



APPEAL NO. 85-302 



NORTH OF MARKET PLANNING 
COALITION, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



MANUEL C. GUIZAR, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



CARMEN A. PELOSI, Appellant 

vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



RHONDA SLCWINSKI, Appellant 

vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



[Protesting issuance on 
[November 1 , 1985, to S.M.G. 
[Market, Inc., permit to erect 
[a structure at 865 Market Street 
[APPLICATION NO. 8308323S. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(12/22/85) 



APPEAL NO. 86-004 



[Appealing for refund of penalty 

[imposed on January 6, 1986, for 

[work done at 2141-A Mission Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8508713. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/15/86) 



APPEAL NO. 85-332 



TDenial on December 5, 1985, 
[of a pushcart peddler permit at 
[255-295 California Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(1/22/86) 



APPEAL NO. 85-331 



"[Denial on December 3, 1985, 
[of masseuse permit at 518 Taylor 
[Street . 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(1/21/86) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS JANUARY 15, 1986 



PAGE TWO 



APPEAL NO 
THUY CLARK, dba "LA BELLA MASSAGE, 71 

Appellant 
vs . 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



85-336 



[Revocation on December 9, 1985, for 

[massage establishment permit at 

[451 O'Farrell Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/27/86) 



APPEAL NO. 85-320 



BA THI GOLDBERG, dba "NIKKI'S" 

Appellant 
vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



[Suspension on November 12, 1985, of 

[massage establishment permit at 

[1172 Sutter Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/1/86) 



APPEAL NO. 85-329 



BYUNG SOON HUNT, dba "EMPRESS HEALTH 
SPA, " Appellant 

vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



JAMES J. SIMKALO, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



DAVID CARKEEK, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



WILLIAM H. CLARK, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



JAMES F. FIELDS, Appellant 
) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



RACHEL CURIEL, Appellant 
) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



NEIL MUDERLOH, Appellant 
) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Revocation on November 26, 1985, 

[of permit for massage establishment 

[at 428 O'Farrell Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/21/86) 



APPEAL NO. 85-285 



[Denial on October 30, 1985, 

[of permit to alter a building at 

[500 Hyde Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8507074. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(12/9/85) 



APPEAL NO. 85-343 



[Denial on December 19, 1985, 

[of permit to Theordore Jenkel to 

[alter a building at 1201 Greenwich 

[Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8508988. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/8/86) 



APPEAL NO. 85-003 



[Denial on December 27, 1985, of 

[permit to alter a building at 

[4014-21st Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8512841 . 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/12/86) 



APPEAL NO. 86-001 



TProtesting issuance on 
[December 23, 1985, to Mark Paschal, 
[permit tc alter a building at 

[727 Peralta Street 

[APPLICATION NO. 8511296 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/11/86) 



APPEAL NO. 86-005 



[Protesting issuance on 

[December 27, 1985, to Joe & Jessica 

[Ma, permit to alter a building at 

[174 Brussels Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8512210. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/15/86) 



APPEAL NO. 86-007 



[Protesting issuance on 

[January 3, 1986, to Patrick O'Connor, 

[permit to erect a structure at 

[1916 Page Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8508600. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/16/86) 



APPEAL NO. V85-341 
EVELYN NG, Appellant [Denial on December 13, 1985, 

)) vs. [of rear yard variance sought for 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [property located at 5049 Anza 

[Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(1/29/86) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS JANUARY 15, 1986 PAGE THREE 

SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD 

*APPEAL NO. 85-330 



JOHN DEBOIS, Appellant "[Protesting issuance on 

NO. 3) vs. [December 2, 1985, to Jack Kavanagh, 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [permit to erect a structure at 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [61 Saturn Street. 

[SITE INSPECTION TUESDAY, 

[JANUARY 14, 1986, at 4:30 P.M. (1/21/86) 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OP PERMIT APPEALS 

Jerry E. Berg President 

Robert J. McCarthy Vice President 

Mattie J. Jackson Commissioner 

Douglas J. Engmann Commissioner 

Richard J. Guggenhime Commissioner 

Doris Levine Official Court Reporter - 456-9899 

Robert H. Feldman Executive Director - 558-4421 



SPECIAL NOTE 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals 
are sent to all parties at least five days 
prior to the date of hearing. In the event 
that a matter is continued to a specific date 
by the presiding officer and announced to the 
parties in the hearing room, no additional 
railed notice will be sent. Please cell the 
Board office at 558-4421 for scheduling or 
other information during regular business hours 



BOARE OF PERMIT APPEALS 
CITY HALL ROOK 154-A 
TELEPHONE 55E-442] 






^??Orf/2/ 



$iva<«v iiwaad do aava 



P30 




>j & .1-- -^S'P 

ME ETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS documents dept. 
WEDNESDAY/'JANUARY 22, 1986 J AN U 1386 

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL SMJ francisco 

PUBLIC LIBRARY 



MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 



APPEAL NO. 85-339 



CAROL CATTIVERA, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 
[December 10, 1985, to J.& J. 
[Owens Construction Company, of 
[permit to erect a structure at 
[156 Ellis Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8312187. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 



(1/29) 



APPEAL NO. 85-234 



GARY KRAY AND LARRY HABEGGER, 

Appellants 
vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



DAVID CARKEEK, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



TProtesting issuance on 

[September 5, 1985, to Dixon Kelly, 

[permit to demolish a building at 

[221 Filbert Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8502615. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (10/29/85) 



APPEAL NO. 85-343 



[Denial on December 19, 1985, of 
[permit to alter a building at 
[1201 Greenwich Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8508988. 
[FOR FURHTER HEARING TODAY. (2/8) 



BARRY KANE, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



JAMES F. FIELDS, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 85-325 



[Denial or. December 2, 1985, 

[of permit to erect a two- family 

[dwelling at 215 Upper Terrace. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8509730. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (1/11) 



APPEAL NO. 86-001 



"[Protesting issuance on 
[December 23, 1985, to Mark Paschal, 
[permit to alter a building at 
[727 Peralta Street 
[APPLICATION NO. 8511295. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (2/11) 



APPEAL NO. 85-214 



DANIEL S. YOUNG, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



"[Denial on August 16, 1985 of 
[permit to alter a building at 
[463-7th Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8506178. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 



(10/2/85) 



APPEAL NO. 85-316 



PETER BULLOCK, Appellant 
) vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



APPEAL NO 



JORAM ALTMAN, Appellant 
) vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



"[Denial on November 22, 1985, of 
[permit to alter a building at 
[246 McAllister Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8508333. 
[FOR REHEARING TODAY. (1/1) 

V85-324 

fDenial on November 21, 1985, of 
[rear yard variance sought for 
[property at 42 Woodland Avenue. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/11) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS JANUARY 22, 1986 



PAGE TWO 



APPEAL NO. 86-008 



CHUNG YU KWAN, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



T Appealing for refund of penalty 
[imposed on January 3, 1986, for 
[work done at 521-523 Third Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8507295. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/17) 



APPEAL NO. 85-306 



TRANG THI THUY TRAN, Appellant 

vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



BYUNG SOON HUNT, dba "EMPRESS 
HEALTH SPA," Appellant 

vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



"[Denial on October 29, 1985, of 

[massage establishment permit at 

[1284 Mission Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/25/85) 



APPEAL NO. 85-329 



[Revocation on November 26, 1985, of 
[permit for massage establishment 
[at 428 O'Farrell Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/21) 



APPEAL NO. 85-336 



THUY CLARK, dba "LA BELLA MASSAGE," 

Appellant 
vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 

APPEAL NO 
HUNG VAN LE, dba "LA BELLA MASSAGE, 11 

Appellant 
vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



[Revocation on December 9, 1985, 
[for massage establishment permit 
[at 451 O'Farrell Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/27) 



86-006 



TDenial on January 6, 1986, of 
[massage establishment permit at 
[451 O'Farrell Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/19) 



APPEAL NO. 86-016 
FRAIN M. MAYNARD, dba "MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT," [Denial on January 6, 1986, of 

Appellant [massage establishment permit 

vs. [at 1020 Geary Street. 



>) 



APPEAL NO. 86-002 



POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



REIKO FUJIWARA, Appellant 
5) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



APPEAL NO 
SCOTT H. LEWIS, dba "CAMERON CONSTRUCTION," 

Appellant 
7) vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(2/23) 



TDenial on January 2, 1986, of 
[permit to alter a building at 
[722 Bush Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8512612. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(2/11) 



86-010 



"[Denial on January 10, 1986, of 
[permit to alter a building at 
[49 Hoffman Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8600034. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/19) 



APPEAL NO. 86-013 



TAMARA AND MILDA DZENIS, Appellants" 
8) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



TProtesting issuance on January 3, 
[1985, to Hebrew Academy of San 
[Francisco, of permit to alter a 
[building at 1333 Balboa Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8510064. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/12) 



APPEAL «0. 86-014 



LARRY WASSERMAN, Appellant 
9) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



TDenial n January 6, 1986, of 
[permit to alter a building at 
(835 Larkin Street. (AWNING) 
[APPLICATION NO. 8513682. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(2/23) 






MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS JANUARY 22, 1986 PA6E THREE 

APPEAL NO. 86-015 
LARRY WASSERMAN, Appellant t Denial on January 6, 1986, of 

vs. [permit to alter a building at 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [909 Geary Street. (AWNING) 

CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8513680. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/23) 

APPEAL NO. 86-017 
NIKOLAY R. CLEVER, Appellant [Denial on January 15, 1986, of 

vs. [permit to alter a building at 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [2312 Leavenworth Street. 

CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8508525. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/24) 

Election of President and Vice President of the Board of Permit Appeals for 1986. 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

Jerry E. Berg President 

Robert J. McCarthy Vice President 

Mattie J. Jackson Commissioner 

Douglas J. Engmann Commissioner 

Richard J. Guggenhime Commissioner 

Doris Levine Official Court Reporter - 456-9899 

Robert H. Feldman Executive Director - 558-4421 



SPECIAL NOTE 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals 
are sent to all parties at least five days 
prior to the date of hearing. In the event 
that a matter is continued to a specific date 
by the presiding officer and announced to the 
parties in the hearing room, no additional 
mailed notice will be sent. Please call the 
Board office at 558-4421 for scheduling or 
other information during regular business hours 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 
CITY HALL ROOM 154-A 
TELEPHONE 558-4421 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

CITY HALL 
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 




Public Library 



5F 

o 



•ss QjKtJLt* 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 29, 1986 
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 



uuQUMENTS DEPT, 

M 2 7 1986 

CAU FHANGISCO 
PUBLIC LIBRARV 



MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 



APPEAL NO. V85-324 



JORAM ALTMAN, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



* APPEAL NO. 86-017 



NIKOLAY R. CLEVER, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 85-243 



ALBERT AND SIMA BERNZWEIG, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



[Denial on November 21, 1985, 

[of rear yard variance sought 

[for property located at 

[42 Woodland Avenue. . 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. Vl/ll) 



[Denial on January 15, 1986, of 
[permit to alter a building at 
[2312 Leavenworth Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8508525. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (2/24) 



[Order to cease violation of 

[the Planning Code dated 

[September 17, 1985, for property 

[at 750 Rivera Street. 

[FOR REHEARING TODAY. (10/23/85) 



APPEAL NO. 86-005 



RACHEL CURIEL, Appellant 

vs . 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 85-214 



DANIEL S. YOUNG, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



[Protesting issuance on 

[December 27, 1985, to Joe & 

[Jessica Ma, of permit to alter 

[a building at 174 Brussels 

[Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8512210. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (2/15) 



[Denial on August 16, 1985, of 
[permit to alter a building at 
[463-7th Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8506178, 



[FOR REHEARING TODAY 



(10/2/85) 



APPEAL NO. 86-009 



MATHEW COHEN (AKA ROYCE), Appellant 

vs . 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



KENNETH P. EISLEY, Appellant 

vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



BYUNG SOON HUNT, dba "EMPRESS 
HEALTH SPA," Appellant 
) vs. 

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 86-018 



APPEAL NO. 85-329 



[Appealing for refund of penalty 
[imposed on January 10, 1986, for 
[work done at 76 Homestead Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8512414. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/19) 



[Denial on January 9, 1986, of 
[massage establishment permit at 
[518 Taylor Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/24) 



[Revocation on 
[of permit for 
[at 428 O'Farrell 
[FOR HEARING TODAY 



November 26, 1985, 
massage establishment 



(1/21) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS JANUARY 29, 1986 



PAGE TWO 



APPEAL NO. 86- 



FRAIN M. MAYNARD, dba "MASSAGE 
ESTABLISHMENT," Appellant 

vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



LARRY WASSERMAN, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



LARRY WASSERMAN, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



DAVID T. TRUSLOW, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



016 

~ ["Denial on January 6, 1986, of 
[massage establishment permit 
[at 1020 Geary Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



APPEAL NO. 86-014 



APPEAL NO. 86- 



XDenial on January 6, 1986, of 
[permit to alter a building at 
[835 Larkin Street. (AWNING) 
[APPLICATION NO. 8513682. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



015 
"TDenial 



on January 6, 1986, of 
[permit to alter a building at 
[909 Geary Street. (AWNING) 
[APPLICATION NO. 8513680. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



APPEAL NO. 



86-020 

fDenial 



on January 16, 1986, of 
[permit to alter a building at 
[335 Ralston Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8600059. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY 



APPEAL NO. 



BARBARA WINKLER, Appellant 

vs . 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
DAHI DISAPPROVAL 



ELDON H. REILEY, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
DAHI DISAPPROVAL 



86-021 

[Denial 



APPEAL NO. 






APPEAL NO 



MARY CLAIRE HEFFRON, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



on January 10, 1986, of 
[permit to alter a building at 
[645 Leavenworth Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8514345. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 

86-024 

"[Denial on January 16, 1986, of 
[permit to alter a building at 
[834 Castro Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8513333. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 

86-025 

XDenial on January 21, 1986, of 
[permit to alter a building at 



[131-133 Belvedere Street, 
[APPLICATION NO. 8600523, 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(2/23) 



(2/23) 



(2/23) 



(2/26) 



(2/25) 



(2/26) 



(3/2) 



APPEAL NO 



NORTH OF MARKET PLANNING COALITION, 

Appellant 
vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



85-302 

"["Protesting issuance on November 1, 
[1985, to S.M.G. Market, Inc., 



[permit to erect a structure at 
[865 Market Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 83083235. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(12/22/85) 



HAROLD SELLMAN, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 86-019 

["Protesting issuance on January 8, 

[1986, to Patrick Naughton, of permit 

[to demolish a building at 

[1641-48th Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8513908. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/24) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS JANUARY 29, 1986 PAGE THREE 



APPEAL NO. 86-022 



LORRAINE VAIL, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



"[Protesting issuance 
[on January 7, 1986, to Mark Turok, 
[permit to erect a structure at 
[250 Peralta Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8504984. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/26) 



APPEAL NO. 86-026 



SAN FRANCISCANS FOR REASONABLE GROWTH, 

Appellant 
vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO 



EVELYN NG, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



DAVID MACKLER, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



"[^Protesting reaffirmation of 
[approval of permit issued to 
[Marathon U.S. Realties, Inc. on 
[April 29, 1983, for construction 
[of office complex at 353 and 355 
[Second Street. 
[PERMIT NO. 500385. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/2) 

V85-341 

[Denial on December 13, 1985, 

[of rear yard variance sought for 

[property located at 5049 Anza 

[Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/29) 



APPEAL NO. V86-023 

[Denial on January 7, 1986, of 
[rear yard and usable open space 
[variance sought for the property 
[located at 142 Capra Way. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/26) 



SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD 



APPEAL NO 



NIKOLAY R. CLEVER, Appellant 
1 3) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



86-017 

[Denial on January 15, 1986, of 
[permit to alter a building at 
[2312 Leavenworth Street. 
[SITE INSPECTION TUESDAY, 
[JANUARY 28, 1986, AT 4:30 P.M. 



(2/24) 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

Jerry E. Berg President 

Robert J. McCarthy Vice President 

Mattie J. Jackson Commissioner 

Douglas J. Engmann Commissioner 

Richard J. Guggenhime Commissioner 

Doris Levine Official Court Reporter - 456-9899 

Robert H. Feldman Executive Director - 558-4421 



SPECIAL NOTE 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals 
are sent to all parties at least five days 
prior to the date of hearing. In the event 
that a matter is continued to a specific date 
by the presiding officer and announced to the 
parties in the hearing room, no additional 
mailed notice will be sent. Please call the 
Board office at 558-4421 for scheduling or 
other information during regular business hours 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 
CITY HALL ROOM 154-A 
TELEPHONE 558-4421 







301*6 vo 'o'osionvu J NVS 

TWH AXIO 
91V3cblVll joauvca 



JCUMENTS DEPT. 

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS FEB 4 ' 986 

WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1986 PUBLic R Lm C R| C RY 




5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 



) MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 

APPEAL NO. 85-234 
GARY KRAY AND LARRY. HABEGGER, Appellant [Protesting issuance on 
) vs. [September 5, 1985, to Dixon Kelly, 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [permit to demolish a building at 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [221 Filbert Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8502615. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (10/29/85) 

APPEAL NO. 85-238 
JOANN M. UZETA, Appellant ["Denial on September 11, 1985, of 

) vs. [assistant mobile caterer permit. 

SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT, ["Roy's Catering," Truck No. 33. 

Respondent [FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (10/10/85) 



APPEAL NO. 86-005 



RACHEL CURIEL, Appellant TProtesting issuance on December 27, 

) vs. [1985, to Joe & Jessica Ma, permit to 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [alter a building at 174 Brussels 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8512210. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (2/15) 

APPEAL NO. 85-243 
ALBERT AND SIMA BERNZWEIG, Appellant [Order to cease violation of the 

) vs. [Planning Code dated September 17, 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [1985, for property at 750 Rivera 

[Street. 
[FOR REHEARING TODAY. (11/3/85) 

APPEAL NO. V85-341 
EVELYN NG, Appellant [Denial on December 13, 1985, of 

>) vs. [rear yard variance sought for 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [property located at 5049 Anza 

[Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/29) 

APPEAL NO. 85-014 
LARRY WASSERMAN, Appellant [Denial on January 6, 1986, 

vs. [of permit to alter a building at 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [835 Larkin Street. (AWNING) 

CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8513682. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/23) 

APPEAL NO. 85-015 
LARRY WASSERMAN, Appellant [Denial on January 6, 1986, of 

B) vs. [permit to alter a building at 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [909 Geary Street. (AWNING) 

CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8513680. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/23) 

APPEAL NO. 86-024 
ELDON H. REILEY, Appellant [Denial on January 16, 1986, of 

9) vs. [permit to alter a building at 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [834 Castro Street. 

DAHI DISAPPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8513333. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/26) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS FEBRUARY 5, 1986 PAGE TWO 

APPEAL NO. 86-027 



ADRIENNE MANSI, Appellant "[Protesting issuance on 

0) vs. [January 22, 1986, to Kieran 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Keaney, permit to demolish a 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [building at 225-21st Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8600364. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/8) 

APPEAL NO. 86-028 
PAUL & SHIRLEY DIMAPILIS, Appellant [Protesting issuance on 

1) vs. [January 17, 1986, to Edwin F. E. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [and Nancy Houtkooper, permit to 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [alter a building at 260 San 

[Anselmo Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8513538. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/8) 

APPEAL NO. 86-011 



WILLIAM TALMAGE JR., Appellant "[Order to cease violation of the 

12) vs. [City Planning Code, dated January 3, 
ZONING ADMINISTRATORS, Respondent [1985, for property located at 2882- 

[2898 23rd Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/19) 

APPEAL NO. V86-023 
DAVID MACKLER, Appellant [Denial on January 7, 1985, of 

13) vs. [rear yard and usable open space 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [variance sought for the property 

[located at 142 Capra Way. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/26) 

14) PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO RULES OF THE BOARD TO AMEND SECTION 5 OF ARTICLE 1: To allow 
for 15 minutes of argument for each principal or ten minutes per person, whichever is 
less, and other related items. 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

Jerry E. Berg President 

Robert J. McCarthy Vice President 

Mattie J. Jackson Commissioner 

Douglas J. Engmann Commissioner 

Doris Levine Official Court Reporter - 456-9899 
Robert H. Feldman Executive Director - 558-4421 



SPECIAL NOTE 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals 
are sent to all parties at least five days 
prior to the date of hearing. In the event 
that a matter is continued to a specific date 
by the presiding officer and announced to the 
parties in the hearing room, no additional 
mailed notice will be sent. Please call the 
Board office at 558-4421 for scheduling or 
other information during regular business hours 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 
CITY HALL ROOM 154-A 
TELEPHONE 558-4421 







£01*6 VO 'ODSIONVUd NVS 
11 VH AilO 

snvauuv ±u\iH3d jo aava 



3 



-5P 

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 



Qm+Jj** 



WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 19, 1986 
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 



DOCUMENTS DEPT. 

FEB 1 8 1986 

CAN FRANCISCO 
PUBLIC LIBRARY 



(1) MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 



APPEAL NO. 85-243 



ALBERT AND SIMA BERNZWEIG, Appellant 
(2) vs. 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



(9) 



APPEAL NO 



BYUNG SOON HUNT, dba "EMPRESS HEALTH" 
SPA," Appellant 

vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



"[Order to cease violation of 
[the Planning Code dated 
[September 17, 1985, for property 
[at 750 Rivera Street. 
[FOR REHEARING TODAY. (11/3/85) 

85-329 

[Revocation on November 26, 1985, 
[of permit for massage establish- 
ment at 428 O'Farrell Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/21) 



APPEAL NO. 86- 



JOHN A. P. GLUCK, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



■034 

LDenial on February 3, 1986, 
[of permit to alter a building 
[at 1947 Pine Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8511974. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(3/18) 



VIHN QUY NGUYEN, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



NORTH OF MARKET PLANNING 
COALITION, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



MARK 0. RAND, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 86-031 

[DFnial on February 5, 1986, of 
[permit to alter a building at 
[2250 Mission Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8505897. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 

APPEAL NO. 85-302 

[Protesting issuance on 
[November 1 , 1985, to S.M.G. 
[Market, Inc., permit to erect a 
[structure at 865 Market Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8308323S. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 

APPEAL NO. 86-030 

[Protesting issuance on 



(3/18) 



(12/22/85) 



[January 22, 1986, to Ravano, 
[permit to erect a structure at 
[601-603 Duncan Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8508857. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(3/12) 



APPEAL NO. 86-032 



RICHARD COHEN, Appellant 
(8) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



ADRIENNE 



MANSI 
vs. 



Appellant 



DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 

[January 29, 1986, to Ted O'Neill, 

[permit to erect a structure at 

[1679 - 11th Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8511195. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/18) 

APPEAL NO. 86-027 

[Protesting issuance on 

[January 22, 1986, to Kieran 

[keaney, permit to demolish a 

[building at 225 - 21st Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8600364. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/8) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS FEBRUARY 19, 1986 



PAGE TWO 



TO) 



11) 



12) 



WILLIAM TALMAGE JR., 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, 



Appellant 
Respondent 



JOHN WALSH, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 86-011 

LOrder to cease violation of 
[the City Planning Code, dated 
[January 3, 1986, for property 
[located at 2882 - 23rd Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 

APPEAL NO. 86-029 

[Determination on January 17, 



(2/19) 



APPEAL NO 



J. PAT REEVES, Appellant 

vs . 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



[1986, by the Zoning Administrator 

[that proposed alterations to the 

[building at 48 Second are Major 

[Alterations . 

[APPLICATION NO. 8509272. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/8) 

86-033 

[Determination on January 31 , 

[1986, by the Zoning Administrator 

[that the use of the property at 

[2586-90 Folsom and 

[3014 - 22nd Street has C-2 

[zoning status. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/18) 



13) BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1986-87 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

ROBERT J. MCCARTHY VICE PRESIDENT 

MATT IE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the department, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less. If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing. 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) 



SPECIAL NOTE 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
558-4421 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 



Robert H. Feldman City and County of San Francisco 

Executive Director BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 558-4421 Room 154-A - City Hall 

San Francisco, California 94102 



j 



PO (J? 20L>6 YD 'OOSIONVUd H 



"HVH AJ.IO 



'2 




MEETING OF THE BOARD Of PERMIT APPEALS 
VCTNESDAY^-fEBRUARY 26, 1986 
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 



uuCUMENTS DEPT, 

1986 

SAii IrKAiMStSCO 
PUBLIC LIBRARY 



GARY KRAY AND LARRY HABEGGER, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 

APPEAL N O. 85-234 

[Protesting issuance on 

[September 5, 1985, to Dixon Kelly, 

[permit to demolish a building at 

[221 Filbert Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8502615. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (10/29/85) 

APPEAL NO. V85-309 

[Denial on November 7, 1985, 



ERIC ROSENQUIST, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



[of rear yard variance sought 
[for property located at 
[3728-30 Taraval Street. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 



(12/28/85) 



ADRIENNE MANSI, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 86-027 

[Protesting issuance 



on 



APPEAL NO 



DANIEL S. YOUNG, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



[January 22, 1986, to Kieran Keaney, 

[permit to demolish a building 

[at 225-21st Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8600364. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (3/8) 



85-214 
[Denial 



CARLOS GARCIA, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



on August 16, 1985, of 
[permit to alter a building at 
[463-7th Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8506178. 
[FOR FURTHER REHEARING TODAY. 

APPEAL NO. 85-041 

[Imposition of penalty on 



(10/2/85) 



APPEAL NO 



WILLIAM TALMAGE JR., Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



VIHN QUY NGUYEN, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



SCOOTER SIMMONS, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



[February 10, 1986, for work done 

[at 563 Silver Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8514208. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/30) 

86-011 

[Order to cease violation of the 

[City Planning Code, dated 

[January 3, 1986, for property 

[located at 2882-23rd Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/19) 

APPEAL NO. 86-031 

[Denial on February 5, 1986, of 

[permit to alter a building at 

[2250 Mission Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8505897. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/18) 



APPEAL NO 



85-039 

[Determination on February 6, 1986, 
[by the Zoning Administrator that 
[the proposed alterations to the 
[building at 315 Montgomery Street 
[are major alterations. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/26) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS FEBRUARY 26, 1986 



PAGE TWO 



DORIS BERMAN, Appellant 
) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 

2) 

3) 



PETER C. WITMER, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 86-040 

[Protesting issuance on 

[February 13, 1986, to Edna Jeffrey, 

[permit to erect a structure at 

[2284 Market Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8514297. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/30) 

APPEAL NO. 86-042 

[Protesting issuance on 

[February 13, 1986, to Thomas J. 

[Walker, permit to alter a building at 

[639 Steiner Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8503427. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/31) 



Executive Session on Personnel matter 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

ROBERT J. MCCARTHY VICE PRESIDENT 

MATTIE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the department, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure - that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes « or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing. 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) 



SPECIAL NOTE 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
558-4421 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 



Robert H. Feldman City and County of San Francisco 

Executive Director BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 558-4421 Room 154-A - City Hall 

San Francisco, California 94102 






^V3«WVJLIWy 



EP 



zi$l%<* 



<&Qm.-iAaj 



-^5P 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF- PERMIT APPEALS 

WEDNESDAY^IARCH 5, 1986 

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 



DOCUMENTS DEBT. 

MAR 4 198B 

8AN FKANC1SC0 
PUBLIC LIBRARY 



MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 



APPEAL NO 



DANIEL S. YOUNG, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



JOSEPH C. AND CATHY J. FRAGOLA, 

Appellants 
vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



LINDSAY MEARNS, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



85-214 

TDenial on August 16, 
[of permit to alter a 



1985 



[building at 463-7th Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8506178. 
[FOR FURTHER REHEARING TODAY. 



(10/2/85) 



APPEAL NO. 86-04 7 



APPEAL NO 



TDenial on February 25, 1986, 
[of permit to alter a building 
[at 220 Hartford Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8601316. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY 



86-037 

"["Protesting 



(4/6) 



issuance on February 7, 
[1986, to Wen Shyang Tsai , permit 
[to demolish a building at 1679 
[11th Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8511894. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/25) 



RICHARD COHEN, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 86-032 

^Protesting issuance on 



[January 29, 1986, to Ted O'Neill, 

[permit to erect a structure at 

[1679-llth Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8511195. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/18) 



RAYMOND L. TRITTSCHUH, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 86-036 



TProtesting issuance on February 3, 
[1986, to F. Cafferkey, permit to 
[demolish a building at 
[1517-20th Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8600742. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/25) 



APPEAL NO. 86-043 



MIMI CHAMBERS, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



"{Protesting issuance on 
[December 17, 1985, to Bradley 
[Young, permit to erect a structure 
[at 118 Brewster Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8509906. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/1) 



APPEAL NO. 86-044 



BARBARA M. CHAMPION, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



"["Protesting issuance on 
[February 13, Iy86, to Edwin J. 
[Moore, permit to alter a building 
[at 40-44 Short Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8509386. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/1) 



GREGORY E. JONES & ROBERT MORILL, 

Appellants 
vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 86-046 

^Protesting issuance on 



[February 13, 1986, to Richard Figone, 

[permit to erect a structure at 

[475 Lombard Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8511123S. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/5) 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

ROBERT J. MCCARTHY VICE PRESIDENT 

MATTIE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the department, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure - that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes~per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing. 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) 



SPECIAL NOTE 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
558-4421 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 



Robert H. Feldman City and County of San Francisco 

Executive Director BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 558-4421 Room 154-A - City Hall 

San Francisco, California 94102 



toaqn 3 !-Lq n d 




*t0lh6VO'OOS10NV«d 
T1VH AilO 






MEETING OF THE BOARD OP PERMIT APPEALS 
WEDNESDAY j^MARCH 19, 1986 
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 



uOCUMENTS DE>T. 

MAR 13 1986 

SAN FRANCISCO 
PUBLIC LIBRARY 



MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 

APPEAL NO. 85-243 



ALBERT AN 
ZONING ADM 




Appel lant 
pondent 



aU 



TOrder to cea-sre violation of 
[the PI anjyfng Cp^e' dated 
[Septe^ffrfcer \J>' 1 985 , for property 
[at/7o0 Rivera Street. 
[FOR REHEARING TODAY. (11/3/85) 



APPEAL NO. 86-005 



RACHEL CURIEL, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



TProtesting issuance on December 

[27, 1985, to Joe and Jessica Ma, 

[permit to alter a building at 

[174 Brussells Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8512210. 

[FOR REHEARING TODAY. (2/15) 



APPEAL NO. 86-050 



RUTH M. CROCKARD, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



"[Protesting issuance on 
[February 25, 1986, to 
[Thomas Pulliam, permit to 
[alter a building at 
[277 Molimo Drive. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8512420. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(4/9) 



* APPEAL NO. 86-043 



MIMI CHAMBERS, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNNING APPROVAL 



TProtesting issuance on 
[December 17, 1985, to Bradley 
[Young, permit to erect a 
[structure at 118 Brewster Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8509906. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (4/1) 



** APPEAL NO. 86-040 



DORIS BERMAN, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



TProtesting issuance on February 

[13, 1986, to Edna Jeffrey, permit 

[to erect a structure at 

[2284 Market Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8514297. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (3/30) 



APPEAL NO. 86-031 



VIHN QU 

DEPT. PUt 
CITY PL 




Respondent 
SAPPROVAL 



3 



Jbt 




5, 1986, of 
ding at 



8505897. 
ING TODAY. 



(3/8) 



APPEAL NO. 85-329 
BYUNG SOON HUNT, dba "EMPRESS HEALTH [Revocation on November 26, 1985, 

SPA," Appellant [of permit for massage establishment 

vs . [at 428 O'Farrell Street. 

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent [FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/21) 



JOHN A. P. GLUCK, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 86-034 



TDenial on February 3, 1986, 
[of permit to alter a building 
[at 1947 Pine Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8511974. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/18) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, MARCH 19, 1986 



PAGE TWO 



APPEAL NO. 86-048 



SAN FRANCISCO BOY'S CHORUS, Appellant 

vs . 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



TDenial on February 28, 1986, 
[of permit to alter a building 
[at 625 Polk Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8514522. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(4/9) 



APPEAL NO. 86-042 



PETER C. WITMER, Appellant 

vs . 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



TProtesting issuance on 
[February 13, 1986, to Thomas J. 
[Walker, permit to alter a building 
[at 639 Steiner Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8503427. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/31) 



APPEAL NO. 86-049 



THOMAS J. MCCARTHY, Appellant 

vs . 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



TProtesting issuance on 
[February 18, 1986, to Dominic Yam, 
[permit to alter a building at 
[2900 Franklin Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8405880. 
[FOR HEARING TOAY . - (4/9) 



APPEAL NO. 86-052 



WILLIAM MAZZETTI, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



TProtesting issuance on 

[February 20, 1986, to Anthony and 

[Carol DeLucchi , to alter a 

[building at 401 Castenada Avenue. 

[A r -?LICATI0rJ NO. 8503940. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/11) 



APPEAL NO. 86-054 



CECIL FU, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



TProtesting issuance on February 27, 
[1986, to Igar Rakvalsky, permit to 
[alter a building at 856-42nd 
[Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8513255. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/13) 



APPEAL NO. 86-055 



JOSEF HOCHFELD, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



TProtesting issuance on 
[February 28, 1986, to Robert Lee 
[permit to alter a building at 
[2436 Ortega Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8510864. 



[FOR HEARING TODAY 



(4/14) 



APPEAL NO. 86-057 



ONABj^ GROWTH, 
Appellant 
"vs 
X WORKS^Respondent 
IING APPROVAL 





TProtesting issuance on 
[February 24, 1 98j 
[Brothc 
[erect 
[35( 

[AP^LICATICWNO. 850 
[FOR HEARING TODAY 




to 



(4/15) 



SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD 



* APPEAL NO. 86-043 



MIMI CHAMBERS, Appellant 
NO. 5) vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



TProtesting issuance on 
[December 17, 1985, to Bradley 
[Young, permit to erect a structure 
[at 118 Brewster Street. 
[SITE INSPECTION TUESDAY, 
[MARCH 18, 1986, at 4:00 P.M. (4/1) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, MARCH 19, 1986 PAGE THREE 

SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD (CONTINUED) 

** APPEAL NO. 86-040 
DORIS BERMAN, Appellant " [Protesting issuance on February 

NO. 6) vs. [13, 1986, to Edna Jeffrey, permit 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [to erect a structure at 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [2284 Market Street. 

[SITE INSPECTION TUESDAY, 

[MARCH 18, 1986, at 5:00 P.M. (3/30) 






MEMBERS O c THE BOARD OF PEWIT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

ROBERT J. MCCARTHY VICE PRESIDENT 

MATT IE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 



THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the department, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only"in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It snail be the procedure - that the time allow ed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes,, or ten minutes per person, whichever is les~sT If more time is 
deemed necessary , such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days Pefore the appointed hearing . 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) 



SPECIAL NOTE 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at* 
558-4421 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 



Robert H. Feldman City and County of San Francisco 

Executive Director BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 558-4421 Room 154-A - City Hall 

San Francisco, California 94102 



BO Art D OF PERMIT APPEALS 

CITY HALL 
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 




Public Library 



f 

30 
l 



&-mLa-> ~~Sr DOCUMENTS DEPT. 

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS MAR 24 1986 
WEDNESDAY-/- MARCH 26, 1986 
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 



SAiJ FRANCISCO 
PUBLIC LIBRARY 



MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 



DORIS BERMAN, Appellant 
) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 86-040 

"[Protesting issuance on February 

[13, 1986, to Edna Jeffrey, permit 

[to erect a structure at 

[2284 Market Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8514297. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (3/30) 

APPEAL NO. 86-031 



VIHN QUY NGUYEN, Appellant 
) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



BYUNG SOON HUNT, dba "EMPRESS 
HEALTH SPA," Appellant 
) vs. 

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



TOM KESSLER, Appellant 
) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



[Denial on February 5, 1986, 
[of permit to alter a building 
[at 2250 Mission Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8505897. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 

APPEAL NO. 85-329 

[Revocation on November 26, 
[1985, of permit for massage 
[establishment at 428 O'Farrell. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 

APPEAL NO. 86-061 

TTmposition of penalty on 
[March 6, 1986, for work done 
[at 278 - 11th Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8509790. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(3/8) 



(1/21) 



(4/20) 



APPEAL NO 



JULIAN M. SIEROTY, et al , Appellant" 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
DAHI DISAPPROVAL 



86-045 

[TJenial 



on February 11 , 1986, 
[of permit to alter a building 
[at 242 Powell Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8514638. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(3/31) 



JOSEPH C. AND CATHY J. FRAGOLA, 
Appellants 
) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



RICHARD COYLE, Appellant 
) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



SAN FRANCISCANS FOR REASONABLE 
GROWTH, Appellant 
vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 86-047 



TTJenial on February 25, 1986, 
[of permit to alter a building 
[at 220 Hartford Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8601316. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(4/16) 



PETER & CHARLENE GOUSSEV, et al , 
Appellants 

vs . 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 86-058 

[TJenial on March 7, 1986, of 
[permit to alter a building 
[at 4084 - 17th Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8500824. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 

APPEAL NO. 86-057 

[Protesting issuance on 
[February 24, 1986, to Hills 
[Brothers Coffee, Inc., permit 
[to erect a structure at 
[350 Steuart Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 85041 03S. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 

APPEAL NO. 86-059 

[Protesting issuance on 
[February 27, 1986, to Sergio 
[Azzollini, permit to alter a 



(4/16) 



(4/15) 



[building at 430 San Bruno Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8506276. 



[FOR HEARING TODAY 



(4/19) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, MARCH 26, 1986 PAGE TWO 

APPEAL NO. 86-060 
LEWIS B. SCHNEIDER, Appellant ["Protesting issuance on March 

)) vs. [3, 1986, to Harold Steinhauser, 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [permit to alter a building at 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [612 Arkansas Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8409611 . 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/20) 

APPEAL NO. 86-062 
FOREST HILL ASSOCIATION, Appellant [Protesting issuance on March 4, 

I) vs. [1986, to Brian C. McEvoy, permit 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [to erect a structure at 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [140 Dorantes Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8509937. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/21) 

APPEAL NO. 86-064 
HOWARD LESTER, Appellant [Protesting issuance on February 

!) vs. [28, 1986, to Melvin and Lia Belli, 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [permit to alter a building at 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [2950 Broadway Ave. (swimming pool) 

[APPLICATION NO. 8511652. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY (4/19) 

APPEAL NO. 86-065 
PLANNING ASSOCIATION FOR THE ["Protesting issuance on March 5, 

RICHMOND, Appellant [1986, to Mary Jeong, permit to 

3) vs. [demolish a building at 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [600 - 10th Avenue 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8601607. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/22) 

APPEAL NO. 86-066 
MARY M. BROOK, Appellant ["Protesting issuance on March 4, 

*) vs. [1986, to Eugenio R. Joven, permit 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [to alter a building at 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [681 Colby Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8510692. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/23) 

APPEAL NO. 86-068 
LISA KLINGER, Appellant [Protesting issuance on March 10, 

5) vs. [1986, to Carter Brown, permit 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [to alter a building at 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [279/281/283 Filbert Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8512196. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/23) 

8 APPEAL NO. 86-051 * 

NATHAN LIU, et al , Appellant [Urder to cease violation of the 

6) vs. [Planning Code dated February 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [20, 1986, for property located 

[at 438A Castro Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/9) 

APPEAL NO. 86-056 
RICHARD TRAVERSO, Appellant [Urder to cease violation of the 

7) vs. [Planning Code dated February 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [28, 1986, for property located 

[at 90-98 - 12th Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/14) 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERN IT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

ROBERT J. MCCARTHY VICE PRESIDENT 

MATTIE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 



THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the department, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure - that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes~per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing. 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) 



SPECIAL NOTE 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
558-4421 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 



Robert H. Feldman City and County of San Francisco 

Executive Director BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 558-4421 Room 154-A - City Hall 






ZOlfrS vo 'o"nr,»? wyj fly 



so 

2 



-IP 



O^Li 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 
WEDNESDAY, APRIL 9, 1986 
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 



DOCUMENTS DEPT. 

APR 8 1986 

1 

SAN FRANCISCO 
PUBLIC LIBRARY 



MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 



ALBERT AND SIMA BERNZWEIG, Appellant 

vs . 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



APPE AL NO. 85-243 

XOrder to cease violation of 



RACHEL CURIEL, Appellant 
3) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



VIHN QUY NGUYEN, Appellant 
4) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



JULIAN M. SIEROTY, et al , Appellants 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
DAHI DISAPPROVAL 



[the Planning Code dated 

[September 17, 1985, for property 

[at 750 Rivera Street. 

[FOR REHEARING TODAY. (11/3/85) 

APPEAL NO. 86-005 

[Protesting issuance on December 
[27, 1985, to Joe and Jessica Ma, 
[permit to alter a building at 
[174 Brussells Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8512210. 
[FOR REHEARING TODAY. (2/15) 

APPEAL NO. 86-031 

[Denial on February 5, 1986, 

[of permit to alter a building 

[at 2250 Mission Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8505897. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (3/8) 

APPEAL NO. 86-045 

fbenial on February 11, 1986 



TOM KESSLER, Appellant 
6) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



JOSEPH C. AND CATHY J. FRAGOLA, 

Appellants 
(7) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



HERBERT CHAO GUNTHER, Appellant 
(8) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



HOWARD LESTER, Appellant 
(9) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[of permit to alter a building 
[at 242 Powell Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8514638. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/31) 

APPEAL NO. 86-061 

pmposition of penalty on 

[March 6, 1986, for work done 

[at 278-llth Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8509790. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/20) 

APPEAL NO. 86-047 

[Denial on February 25, 1986, 

[of permit to alter a building 

[at 220 Hartford Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8601316. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/16) 

APPEAL NO. 86-067 

[Denial on March 7, 1986, of 
[permit to alter a building at 
[741-747 Filbert Street 
[APPLICATION NO. 8514433. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/23) 

APPEAL NO. 86-064 

["Protesting issuance on February 
[28, 1986, to Melvin and Lia Belli, 
[permit to alter a building at 
[2950 Broadway Ave. (swimming pool) 
[APPLICATION NO. 8511652. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/19) 



MEETING DF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, APRIL 9, 1986 PAGE TWO 

APPEAL NO. 86-066 
MARY M. BROOK, Appellant "[Protesting issuance on March 

vs. [4, 1986, to Eugenio R. Joven, 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [permit to alter a building at 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [681 Colby Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8510692. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/23) 

[APPEAL NOS. 86-070 and 96-080 WILL BE HEARD TOGETHER] 

APPEAL NO. 86-070 
SAN FRANCISCANS FOR REASONABLE GROWTTH [Protesting issuance on 

vs. Appellant [March 6, 1986, to Norland 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Properties, permit to alter 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [a building at 345 California 

[Street, (offices on 4th floor) 

[APPLICATION NO. 8514082. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/26) 

APPEAL MO. 86-080 
SAN FRANCISCANS FOR REASONABLE GROWTH"; [Protesting issuance on 

vs. Appellant [March 17, 1986, to Norland 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent - [Properties, permit to alter 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [a buildinq at 345 California 

[Street, (hotel on top 11 floors) 

[APPLICATION NO. 8511684. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/6) 

APPEAL NO. 86-073 



JOSEPH P. ATTURIO, Appellant [Protesting issuance on 

vs. [March 10, 1986, to Martin Brennan, 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [permit to erect a structure 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [at 229 Montcalm. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8513927. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/28) 

APPEAL NO. 86-075 



WILLIAM TULL, JR., et al , Appellants [Protesting issuance on 

) vs. [March 13, 1986, to Tony Scheehan, 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [permit to demolish a building 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [at 126 Fairmount Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8602293. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/30) 

APPEAL NO. 86-076 



DAVID M. FREITAS, et al , Appellants [Protesting issuance on 

i) vs. , [March 14, ;986, to Richard Klein, 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [permit to demolish a building 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [at 1258-lOth Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8602151. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/30) 

APPEAL NO. 86-079 



BERESFORD CORPORATION, Appellant [Protesting issuance on 

5) vs. [March 20, 1986, to Metro 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Pacific Development Co., 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [permit to demolish a building 

[at 737 Post Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8601479. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/5) 

APPEAL NO. 86-081 



BETTY CLARK, Appellant "[Protesting issuance on 

7) vs. [March 18, 1986, to Erven and 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Barbara Torell, permit to 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [alter a building at 

[74 Rockwood Court. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8503843. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/17) 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

ROBERT J. MCCARTHY VICE PRESIDENT 

MATT IE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S, FUNG COMMISSIONER 
DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 



THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the department, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in- exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure~that the time allowed for each side shall not exce ed 
fiftepn minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing. 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) 



SPECIAL NOTE 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent.- Please call the Board office at 
558-4421 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 



Robert H. Feldman City and County of San Francisco 

Executive Director BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 558-4421 Room 154-A - City Hall 

San Francisco, California 94102 



BOARD OF IT APPEALS 

V CI. LL 

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 



Public Library 




F 

30 

z 



G, 



XF 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 
WEDNESDAY, APRIL 16, 1986 
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 



DOCUMENTS D EPr . 

^ 1 7 1986 



IBRARy 



MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 



ERIC ROSENQUIST, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



(12/28/85) 



EVELYN NG, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



WILLIAM C. KIRK, Appellant 

vs . 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



VICTORIA CROCKETT, dba "FANTASIA,"" 

Appellant 
vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. V85-309 

[Denial on November 7, 1985, 
[of rear yard variance sought 
[for property located at 
[3728-30 Taraval Street. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 

APPEAL NO. V85-341 

[Denial on December 13, 1985, 

[of rear yard variance sought for 

[property located at 

[5049 Anza Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/24) 

APPEAL NO. 86-072 

[Imposition of penalty on 

[March 18, 1986, for work done 

[at 1742-26th Avenue. 

[PLUMBING CHARGE NOTICE 26613. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/27) 

APP EAL NO. 86-074 

[Revocation on March 10, 1986, 
[of permit for outcall massage 



EARL T. CHAPMAN, Appellant 

vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



MARK RENNIE, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 
HEALTH DEPARTMENT APPROVAL 



MARGERY WATSON, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



[service at 1751 Market Street, No. 52 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/28) 

APPEAL NO. 86-086 

T/Revocation on March 25, 1986, 



[citation to revoke driver 
[public vehicle permit. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(5/10) 



APPEAL NO. 



86-071 

[Denial 



on March 7, 1986, of 
[permit to alter a building 
[at 285-299 9th Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8600869. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(4/26) 



APPEAL NO, 



86-069 

[Denial 



APPEAL NO. 



FRED ARANDA, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



APPEAL NO 



MICHAEL AND BARBARA LIBASCI, Appellants 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



on March 17, 1986, .of 
[permit to alter a building at 
[1011-1013 Clayton Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8602490. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 

86-077 

[Denial on March 21, 1986, of 
[permit to alter a building 
[at 4136 Fulton Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8600322. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 

86-078 

[Denial on March 21, 1986, of 



(4/26) 



(4/30) 



[permit to alter a building 
[at 1404 Golden Gate Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8602309. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(4/30) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, APRIL 16, 1986 PAGE TWO 

APPEAL NO. 86-085 
LAURENCE G. ALLEN, Appellant [Denial on March 31, 1986, of 

vs. [permit to alter a building at 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [2028-2030 Filbert Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8603314. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/10) 

APPEAL NO. 86-070 
SAN FRANCISCANS FOR REASONABLE GROWTH";; [Protesting issuance on March 6, 

Appellant [1986, to Northland Properties, 

vs. [permit to alter a building at 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [345 California Street. (Offices on 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [4th floor) 

[APPLICATION NO. 8514082 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/26) 

APPEAL NO. 86-080 
SAN FRANCISCANS FOR REASONABLE GROWTH"; [Protesting issuance on March 17, 

Appellant [1986, to Northland Properties, 

vs. [permit to alter a building at 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [345 California Street. (Hotel on top 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [11 floors) 

[APPLICATION NO. 8511684. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/6) 

APPEAL NO. 86-083 
MARVIN ROBINSON, et al , Appellants [Protesting issuance on 

vs. [March 25, 1986, to John Brennan, 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [permit to erect a structure at 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [5201-3rd Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8513289. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/10) 

APPEAL NO. 86-084 
JOHN M. GIOSSO, Appellant [Protesting issuance on 

vs. [March 27, 1986, to Chun-Sun & 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Mora Lai, permit to demolish 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [a building at 451-453 23rd Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8601840. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/10) 

APPEAL NO. 86-056 
RICHARD TRAVERSO, Appellant [Urder to cease violation of the 

i vs. [Planning Code dated February 28, 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. Respondent [1986, for property located at 

[90-98 12th Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/14) 

ABPEAL NO. V86-053 
JOSEPH D. COLLINS, Appellant [Denial on February 20, 1986, 

) vs. [of rear yard variance sought 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [for property located at 

[367 Elsie Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/12) 

APPEAL NO. V86-082 
J.B.M. & K. CONSTRUCTION, Appellant [TJenial on March 18, 1986, 

) vs. [or rear yard variance sought 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [for property located at 

[375-1 9th Avenue. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/7) 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

ROBERT J, MCCARTHY VICE PRESIDENT 

MATTIE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 



THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the department, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may-be made by either party only in- exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure - that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes~per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing. 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) 



SPECIAL NOTE 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
558-4421 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 



Robert H. Feldman City and County of San Francisco 

Executive Director BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 558-4421 Room 154-A - City Hall 

San Francisco, California 94102 



Aaejqn ol L c l n d 

Nviavaan aiio 



zoiwvo'o'nsscwuJN 

11VH A113 



JO 



DOCUMENTS DEPT. 

**» ^9 1986 

SAN FRAN6l«e© 
fiMfJs. QTZ PUBLIC LIBRAHv 



• ^ PUBLIC LIBRARY 



o/sc 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 
WEDNESDAY- APRIL 50, 1986 
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 



MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 

APPEAL NO. V85-309 
ERIC ROSENQUIST, Appellant [Denial on November 7, 1985, 

vs. [of rear yard variance sought 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [for property located at 

[3728-30 Taraval Street. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (12/28/85) 

APPEAL NO. 86-067 



HERBERT CHAO GUNTHER, Appellant [Denial on March 7, 1986, of 

vs. [permit to alter a building at 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent "■ [741-747 Filbert Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8514433. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (4/23) 

APPEAL NO. 86-059 



PETER AND CHARLENE GOUSSEV, et al ^[Protesting issuance on February 27, 

Appellants [1986, to Sergio Azzollini, 

vs. [permit to alter a building at 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [430 San Bruno Avenue. 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8506276. 

[FOR REHEARING TODAY. (5/20) 

APPEAL NO. 86-097 



FM PRODUCTION, Appellant [Imposition of penalty on 

vs. [April 11, 1986, for work 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [done at 999 Brannan Street. 

[CHARGE NOTICE NO. 09340. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/24) 

APPEAL NO. 86-099 
RAMON GREGORY HERNANDEZ, dba, "LA BELLA [Denial on April 16, 1986, 
MASSAGE," Appellant [of massage establishment 

vs. [permit at 451 O'Farrell Street. 

POLICE DEPT., Respondent [FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/27) 

APPEAL NO. 86-076 



DAVID M. FREITAS, et al , Appellants [Protesting issuance on March 14, 

vs. [1986, to Richard Klein, 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [permit to demolish a building 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL , [at 1258-1 Oth Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8602151. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/30) 

APPEAL NO. 86-089 



DAVID M. FREITAS, Appellant [Protesting issuance on March 28, 

vs. [1986, to Richard Klein, 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [permit to erect a structure at 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [1258-1 Oth Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8601080. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/17) 

APPEAL NO. 86-088 

GREATER WEST PORTAL NEIGHBORHOOD [Protesting issuance on March 25, 

ASSOCIATION, Appellant [1986, to Amal Elmoraly, 

vs. [permit to alter a building at 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [1450 Portola Drive. 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8514198. 

FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL [FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/13) 

HEALTH DEPARTMENT APPROVAL 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, APRIL 30, 1986 ; PAGE TWO 

APPEAL NO. 86-092 

MARVIN ROBINSON, et al , Appellants [Protesting issuance on March 31, 

vs. [1986, to John H. Chung, 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [permit to erect a structure 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [at 4026 Third Street. 

FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8513749. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/20) 

APPEAL NO. 86-095 



RITA DEVINE, Appellant ^[Protesting issuance on 

vs. [April 8, 1986, to Rosa Nguyen, 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [permit to alter a building at 

FIRE DEPT. APPROVAL [1868 Page Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8514127. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/11) 

APPEAL NO. 86-087 



MARY FAY BERRIGAN, Appellant [Protesting issuance on April 2, 

vs. [1986, to Bill Graham Presents, 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [permit to alter a building at 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [201-11 th Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8513572. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/13) 

APPEAL NO. 86-090 



VULCAN STAIRWAY ASSOCIATION, Appellant [Protesting issuance on March 28, 
\ vs. [1986, to Ari Marcus, permit 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [to erect a structure at 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [88 Museum Way. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8503733. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/17) 

APPEAL NO. V86-082 
J.B.M. & K. CONSTRUCTION, Appellant TDenial on March 18, 1986, of 

) vs. [rear yard variance sought 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [for property located at 

[375-1 9th Avenue. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/7) 

APPEAL NO. 86-091 



BRANNAN ASSOCIATION, Appellant ~ "" "~ ~~l Determination of the Zoning 
) vs. [Administrator on March 26, 1986, 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [denying Brannan Association the 

[opportunity to file an off-street 
[parking variance at 475 Brannan 
[Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/17) 

APPEAL NO. 86-094 
WILLIAM MCDONAGH, Appellant [Determination of the Zoning 

) vs. [Administrator to William McDonagh, 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [requiring changes on project at 

[4050-1 7th Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8308825. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/20) 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

ROBERT J. MCCARTHY VICE PRESIDENT 

MATTIE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 



THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the department, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure - that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed "necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing. 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) 



SPECIAL NOTE 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
558-4421 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 



Robert H. Feldman City and County of San Francisco 

Executive Director BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 558-4421 Room 154-A - City Hall 

San Francisco, California 94102 






201*6 VO *OD?IO\!VU 1 NVS 

T1VH A1I0 
S"!V3<MV lIt\!H3d dO QHVCKi 



hltu 



fc UMU~ ^SF DOCUMENTS DEBT. 

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS ' ' AY G 1986 

WEDNESDAY, MAY 7, 1986 wblic^IIKiS^ 
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 



MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 

* APPEAL NO. V86-082 
J.B.M. & K CONSTRUCTION, Appellant [Denial on March 18, 1986, of 

vs. [rear yard variance sought 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [for property located at 

[375-1 9th Avenue. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (5/7) 

** APPEAL NO. 86-094 



WILLIAM MCDONAGH, Appellant "~" [Determination of the Zoning 

vs. [Administrator to William McDonagh, 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [requiring changes on project at 

[4050-1 7th Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8308825. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (5/20) 

APPEAL NO. 86-059 



PETER AND CHARLENE GOUSSEV, et al , [Protesting issuance on February 27, 

Appellants [1986, to Sergio Azzollini, 

vs. [permit to alter a building at 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [430 San Bruno Avenue. 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8506276. 

[FOR FURTHER REHEARING TODAY. (5/20) 

APPEAL NO. 86-083 



MARVIN ROBINSON, et al , Appellants [Protesting issuance on ♦March 25, 

vs. [1986, to John Brennan, permit to 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [erect a structure at 5201 Third 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8513289. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (5/10) 

APPEAL NO. 85-248 
PATRICIA FAY GIBERSON, et al , Appellants [Protesting issuance on September 

vs. [19, 1985, to Friedman Association, 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [permit to alter a building at 

DAHI APPROVAL [145 Laurel Street. (REMAND). 

[APPLICATION NO. 8509585. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/6/85) 

APPEAL NO. 85-251 



LAURENCE AND ILENE SANFORD, Appellants "[Protesting issuance on 

vs. [September 19, 1986, to Friedman 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Association, permit to alter a 

DAHI APPROVAL [building at 145 Laurel Street. 

[(REMAND). 

[APPLICATION NO. 8509586. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/6/85) 

APPEAL NO. 86-107 



JOHN WORLDIE, Appellant [Imposition of penalty on 

vs. [April 21, 1986, for work done 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [at 495 Francisco Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8601002. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/31) 

APPEAL NO. 86-109 



JEFFREY POLLACK, Appellant "[Imposition of penalty on 

vs. [April 22, 1986, for work done 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [at 303 Filbert Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8510977. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/1) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, MAY 1, 1986 PAGE TWO 

APPEAL NO. 86-100 
GUS FRANCO, dba "CROWN CATERING," Suspension on April 7, 1986, 

Appellant [of mobile catering permit 

vs. [at 1381 Lowrie Avenue. 

POLICE DEPT., Respondent [FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/27) 

APPEAL NO. 86-074 
VICTORIA CROCKETT, dba "FANTASIA!" [Revocation on March 10, 1986, 

Appellant [of permit for Outcall Massage 

vs. [Service at 1751 Market Street. 

POLICE DEPT., Respondent [Number 52. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/28) 

APPEAL NO. 86-101 
FRANKLIN E. HILTON, dba "OSAKA SFAT" [Denial on April 9, 1986, of 

Appellant [massage establishment permit 

vs. [at 548 Jones Street. 

POLICE DEPT., Respondent [FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/28) 

APPEAL NO. 86-113 



ANN B. CHO, dba "PARKSIDE SCHOOL (JF [Denial on April 17, 1986, of 

MASSAGE," Appellant [permit for Outcall Massage Service 

vs. [at 208 Lake Merced Hill. 

POLICE DEPT., Respondent [FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/7) 

APPEAL NO. 86-110 



S.D. BECHTEL, JR., Appellant [Denial on April 15, 1986, of 

vs. [permit to alter a building 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [at 2190 Broadway. 

CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8502366. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/4) 

APPEAL NO. 86-080 



SAN FRANCISCANS FOR REASONABLE [Protesting issuance on March 17, 

GROWTH, Appellant [1986, to Norland Properties, 

vs. [permit to alter a building at 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [345 California Street. 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [(Hotel on top 11 floors.) 

[APPLICATION NO. 8511684. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/6) 

APPEAL NO. 86-112 



THE TELEGRAPH HILL DWELLERS, Appellant [Protesting issuance on 
) vs. [April 18, 1986, to Lorenzo Petrone, 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [permit to demolish a building 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [at 1234 Grant Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8602558. * 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/7) 

APPEAL NO. 86-105 



MARY ANNE MILLER, Appellant T Protesting issuance on 

) vs. [April 9, 1986, to Vincent Ng, 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [permit to alter a building at 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [1254-42nd Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8600080. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/28) 

APPEAL NO. 86-108 



EDWARD KIEREN, Appellant [Protesting issuance on 

) vs. [April 15, 1986, to Steven 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Geiszler, permit to alter a 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [building at 2360 Steiner Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8509442. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/1) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, MAY *7, 1986 PAGE THREE 

APPEAL NO. V86-053 
JOSEPH D. COLLINS, Appellant ["Denial on February 20, 1986, 

vs. [of rear yard variance sought 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [for property located at 

[367 Elsie Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/12) 

APPEAL NO. V86-093 
JOHN MORIARITY, Appellant [Denial on April 4, 1986, 

vs. [of minimum lot area, rear 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [yard and open space variance sought 

[for property located at 
[3201-03 Market Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/20) 



THOMAS ANGELOFF, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. V86-102 

"Denial on April 9, 1986, 
of rear yard variance sought 
"for property located at 
110 Summit Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/28) 



SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD 

* APPEAL NO. V86-082 
J.B.M. & K. CONSTRUCTION, Appellant TDenial on March 18, 1986, of 

NO. 2) vs. [rear yard variance sought 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [for property located at 

[375-1 9th Avenue. 
[SITE INSPECTION TUESDAY, 
[MAY 6, 1986 AT 5:30 P.M. (5/7) 



** 



APPEAL NO. 86-094 



WILLIAM MCCONAGH, Appellant [Determination of the Zoning 

NO 3) vs. [Administrator to William McDonagh, 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [requiring changes on project at 

[4050-1 7th Street. 
[SITE INSPECTION TUESDAY, 
[MAY 6, 1986 AT 6:15 P.M. (5/20) 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

ROBERT J. MCCARTHY VICE PRESIDENT 

MATTIE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 



THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the department, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure - that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes~per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing. 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) 



SPECIAL NOTE 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
? 558-4421 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 



Robert H. Feldman City and County of San Francisco 

Executive Director BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 558-4421 Room 154-A - City Hall 

San Francisco, California 94102 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

CITY HALL 
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 




-fc fcg-4=«RAMAN l 
Public Library 






WZl/th 




MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

WEDNESDAY, MAY 21, 1986 

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 



DOCUMENTS DEPT. 

MAY % 198S 

SAN FRANCISCO 
PUBLIC LIBRARY 



MATTER FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 



APPEAL NO. 86-111 



LEE GILBERT, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



MARGERY WATSON, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



FRED ARANDA, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



J.B.M. & K. CONSTRUCTION, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



TProtesting determination by the 
[Zoning Administrator on April 16, 
[1986, that plan revisions 
[filed with Building Permit 
[Application No. 8609730, for 
[construction of a two-family 
[house at 215 Upper Terrace are 
[in compliance with the Board's 
[conditions accompanying its 
[approval of said application. 
[(Previous Appeal No. 85-325) 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/4) 

APPEAL NO. 86-069 

TDenial on March 17, 1986, 
[of permit to alter a building 
[at 1011-1013 Clayton Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8602490. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 

APPEAL NO. 8P-077 

[Denial on March 21, 1986, of 
[permit to alter a building 
[at 4136 Fulton Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8600322. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 

APPEAL NO. V86-082 

TDenial on March 18, 1986, of 



[rear yard variance sought 
[for property located at 
[375-1 9th Avenue. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 



LAURENCE G. ALLEN, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



MARY ANNE MILLER, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 86-085 

[Denial on March 31, 1986, of 
[permit to alter a building 
[at 2028-2030 Filbert Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8603314. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 

APPEAL NO. 86-105 

TProtesting issuance on 
[April 9, 1986, to Vincent Ng, 
[permit to alter a building at 
[1254-42nd Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8600080. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 



APPEAL NO. 86-106 



ARTAULFO P. BRIZ, dba "MISSION STATTF 
AND COIN COMPANY," Appellant 

vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



(4/26) 



(4/30) 



(5/26) 



(5/10) 



(5/28) 



APPEAL NO 



FM PRODUCTION, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



"TDenial on April 15, 1986, of 
[second hand dealer-state permit 
[at 2065 Mission Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/28) 

86-097 

""["Imposition of penalty on 
[April 11, 1986, for work done 



[at 999 Brannan Street. 
[CHARGE NOTICE NO. 09340. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(5/24) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, MAY 21, 1986 



PAGE TWO 



APPEAL NO. 86-H4 



RICHARD MORRI, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



T/Prottsting issuance on 
[April 26, 1986, to W. Ferdon, 
[permit to erect a structure at 
[754 San Bruno Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8509450. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(6/11) 



APPEAL NO. 86-115 



BARBARA SHAW, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



TProtesting issuance on 
[April 23, 1986, to Warren R. 
[Giberson, permit to demolish 
[building at 465-28th Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8603349. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(6/11) 



APPEAL NO. 86-116 



PATRICIA HUGHES, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



PATRICIA HUGHES, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



THOMAS C. McGRATH, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 

[April 20, 1986, to Aldo Stemberga, 

[permit to erect a structure at 

[70 Banks Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8500932. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/16) 

APPEAL NO. 86-117 

[Protesting issuance on 

[April 30, 1986, to Aldo Stemberga, 

[permit to erect a structure at 

[74 Banks Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8500930. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/16) 

APPEAL NO. 86-118 

"[Protesting issuance on 
[April 24, 1986, to Lei and Wong, 
[permit to alter a building 
[at 1246 Ulloa Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8506682. 



SUSAN BERTOLLI, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[FOR HEARING TODAY 

APPEAL NO. 86-119 

"[Protesting issuance on 



(6/14) 



GEORGE HOFFBERG, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



JOHN MORIARITY, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



[May 1, 1986, to Richard Garcia, 

[permit to alter a building 

[at 2118 Vallejo Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8504626. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/18) 



APPEAL NO. 86-121 

[Protesting issuance on 
[April 8, 1986, to Ted Aksnes, 
[permit to alter a building at 
[1836 Leavenworth Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8601722. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 

APPEAL NO. V86-093 

[Denial on April 4, 1986, of 



(5/28) 



[minimum lot area, rear yard 
[and open space variance sought 
[for property located at 
[3201-03 Market Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(5/20) 



RICHARD CRANDALL, Appellant 



APPEAL NO 



vs 



ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



V86-120 

"TProtesting imposition of 
[condition in granting of front 
[setback variance sought on 
[April 29, 1986, for property 
[located at 3881 -21st Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(6/18) 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

ROBERT J, MCCARTHY VICE PRESIDENT 

MATTIE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 



THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes'per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing" ! 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) 

SPECIAL NOTE 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
558-4421 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 



Robert H. Feldman City and County of San Francisco 

Executive Director BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 558-4421 Room 154-A City Hall 

San Francisco, California 94102 



AUeuqn OLLqnd 



20 U 6 ■. 

"HVH ah 'j 



IP 

l 

M n 

MM" 



& QjtiJL*~ 



**?£ 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 
WEDNESDAY, MAY 28, 1986 
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 



DOCUMENTS DEPT. 

MAY 3 1285 

SAN FRANCISCO 
PUBLIC LIBRARY 



MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 



APPEAL NO. V85-309 



ERIC ROSENQUIST, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



APPEAL 
SPAT 1 



NO. 86-101 



APPEAL 
OF 



NO. 86-113 



FRANKLIN E. HILTON, dba "OSAKA 

Appellant 
vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



ANN B. CHO, dba "PARKSIDE SCHOOL 
MASSAGE," Appellant 

vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 86-132 
MARIO EVOLA, dba "MARIO'S SERVICE? 1 

Appellant 
vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 86-124 



CHARLES GILLAN, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



JERRY BERNSTEIN, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 86-135 



APPEAL NO. 86-122 



RICHARD AND KATHLEEN KEENAN, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



"[Denial on November 7, 1985, 
[of rear yard variance sought 
[for property located at 
[3728-30 Taraval Street. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 



(12/28/85) 



TDenial on April 9, 1986, of 
[massage establishment permit 
[at 548 Jones Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(5/28) 



[Denial on April 17, 1986, of 
[permit for outcall massage 
[service at 548 Jones Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(5/7) 



iRevocation on May 7, 1986, of 
[permit for tow car operation at 
[735 Filbert Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/28) 



[Denial on May 13, 1986, of 
[permit to alter a building 
[at 2074 Jackson Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8604675. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(6/22) 



TDenial on May 19, 1986, of 
[permit to alter a building 
[at 625 Ashbury Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8604410. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(6/28) 



T Protesting issuance on 
[May 2, 1986, to Jean P. Lewis, 
[permit to demolish a building 
[at 127-15th Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8604322. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/21) 



APPEAL NO. 86-126 



RONN RIDGLE, Appellant 

vs - 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 
HEALTH DEPARTMENT APPROVAL 



TONY SWORD, Appellant 
) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 86-127 



T Protesting issuance on 
[May 5, 1986, to Jay and 
[Master, permit to alter 
[at 1098 Harrison Street 
[APPLICATION NO. 8506385 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



Juthika 
a building 

(6/23) 



[Protesting issuance on May 5, 
[1986, to George Vasil, permit 
[to erect a structure at 
[322 Collingwood Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8412307. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(6/25) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, MAY 28, 1986 



PAGE TWO 



APPEAL NO. 86-129 



RICHARD SLOSS, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 86-130 



TERRANCE BLAZONA, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 86-131 



TERRANCE BLAZONA, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 86-133 



CHERYL J. SKINNER, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 86-134 



PLANNING ASSOCIATION FOR THE RICHAMOND, 

Appellant 
vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



TProtesting issuance on 
[May 14, 1986, to L.J. Toboni , 
[permit to erect a structure at 
[226 Kingston Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8413093. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/25) 



TProtesting issuance on 
[May 9, 1986, to John Walsh, 
[permit to erect a structure at 
[2958-2960 Bush Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8506771. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/25) 



TProtesting issuance on 

[May 9, 1986, to John Walsh, 

[permit to erect a structure at 

[2954-2956 Bush Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8506772. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/25) 



TProtesting issuance on 

[May 7, 1986, to Mary Fong, 

[permit to erect a structure at 

[751-29th Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8500363. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/28) 



TProtesting issuance on 

[May 9, 1986, to Hank Lee, 

[permit to erect a structure 

[at 150-20th Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8505620. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/28) 



APPEAL NO. V86-102 



THOMAS ANGELOFF, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



TTJenial on April 9, 1986, 
[of rear yard variance sought 
[for property located at 
[110 Summit Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



APPEAL NO. V86-123 



JOHN TARANTINO, 
vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, 



Appellant 

Respondent 



"[Denial on May 6, 1986, of 
[rear yard variance sought 
[for property located at 
[135-135A-137 - 95h Avenue. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



APPEAL NO. V86-125 



RICHARD E. VOLLAND, A. I. A 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, 



Appellant 
Respondent 



"[Protesting imposition of 
[condition in granting of 
[side yard variance sought 
[May 5, 1986, for property 
[located at 170 Colon Avenue 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



on 



(5/28) 



(6/22) 



(6/23) 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

ROBERT J. MCCARTHY VICE PRESIDENT 
MATT IE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN COMMISSIONER 
FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 



THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I t SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes~per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing . 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) 

SPECIAL NOTE 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
558-4421 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 



Robert H. Feldman City and County of San Francisco 

Executive Director BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 558-4421 Room 154-A City Hall 

San Francisco, California 94102 



/ 



AUejqL-j DLiqnj 



r W»t«V0'00S10NV«J NV8 

11VH A1I0 
J51V3dWV lUYH3d dO OHVOf 



P50 



6u -6F 

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 
WEDNESDAY ^JUNE 4, 1986 
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 



DOCUMENTS D£p Tt 



MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 



APPEAL NO 



FRED ARANDA, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



86-077 

[Denial on March 21, 1986, of 
[permit to alter a building 
[at 4136 Fulton Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8600322. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 



(4/30) 



APPEAL NO. V86-082 



J.B.M. & K. CONSTRUCTION, Appellant 

vs . 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



"[Denial on March 18, 1986 
[of rear yard variance sought 
[for property located at 
[375-1 9th Avenue. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 



(5/26) 



JACK S. HOEY, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



FM PRODUCTION, Appellant 

vs . 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 86-143 

~ [Imposition of penalty on 
[May 27, 1986, for work done 
[at 832-836 Vallejo Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8600714. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 

APPEAL NO. 86-097 

~ reposition of penalty on 
[April 11, 1986, for work done 
[at 999 Brannan Street. 
[CHARGE NOTICE NO. 09340. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(7/6) 



(5/24) 



APPEAL NO. 86-126 



RONN RIDGLE, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 
HEALTH DEPARTMENT APPROVAL 



FRED V. HERRERA, dba "THE STONE," 

Appel lant 
vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



TProtesting issuance on 
[May 5, 1986, to Jay and 
[Master, permit to alter 
[at 1098 Harrison Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8506385. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY 



Juthi ka 
a building 



(6/23) 



APPEAL NO. 86-098 

"[Denial on April 9 



1986 



ARTAULFO P. BRIZ, dba "MISSION STA~MP 
AND COIN COMPANY," Appellant 
) vs. 

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



[of Cabaret and Dance Hall Keeper- 

[After Hours permits at 

[412 Broadway. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/27) 

APPEAL NO. 86-106 

[Denial on April 15, 1986, of 



[second hand dealer-state permit 
[at 2065 Mission Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(5/28) 



APPEAL NO. 86-136 



GERHARD KUSTER, Appellant 

vs . 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



CHESTER CHIN, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
DAHI DISAPPROVAL 



APPEAL NO 



TDenial on May 15, 1986, of 
[permit to alter a building 
[at 665 Eddy Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8509740. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 

86-138 

HTDenial on May 19, 1986, 
[of permit to alter a building 
[at 143-147 2nd Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8603870. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(6/30) 



(7/1) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, JUNE 4, 1986 



PAGE TWO 



APPEAL NO. 86-12 



GEORGE HOFFBERG, Appellant 

vs . 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORK, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 86-13 






AUDREY PENN RODGERS, Appellant 

vs . 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 86-139 



PAMELA L./ MENDALA/ Appellant 

, ' J 
DEPT. P/JBLIC WORWS, Respondent 

CITY Pl/ANNING APPROVAL 



WfRO\ 



PAMELA SANDOVAL, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 




APPEAL NO. 86-142 



CHARLES H. VAUGHN, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 86-144 



TWIN PEAKS COUNCIL, Appellant 
I vs . 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. V86-1 



THOMAS ANGELOFF, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. V86-1 



CHARLES M. MCLAUGHLIN, Appellant 
) vs. 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



Protesting issuance on 
April 8, 1986, to Ted Aksnes , 
permit to alter a building 
at 1836 Leavenworth Street. 
APPLICATION NO. 8601722. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(5/28) 



Protesting issuance on 
May 12, 1986, to William R. 
Vierra, permit to erect a 
structure at 415 Liberty Street 
APPLICATION NO. 8504076. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(7/1) 



Protesting issuance/on 
May 2U 1986, to Gefcrge 
Becke/, permit to alter 
building at 513 Lioerty 
APPLICATION NO. 8901906 
FOR/HEARING TODAY 



E. 

a 

Street 



(7/1) 



Protesting issuance on 

May 19, 1986, to Wendy Bertrand 

permit to alter a building 

at 478-27th Street. 

APPLICATION NO. 8410162. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(7/4) 



"Protesting issuance on 
May 14, 1986, to Patrick 
Fell owes, permit to erect a 
structure at 5426 California 
Street . 

APPLICATION NO. 8602122. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(7/6) 



Protesting issuance on May 19, 

1986, to R. Earl Robinson, permit 

to alter a building at 

123 Raccoon Drive. 

APPLICATION NO. 8604676. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/7) 

02 

Denial on April 9, 1986, 

of rear yard variance sought 

for property located at 

110 Summit Street. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/28) 

40 

Denial on May 13, 1986, of 

rear yard variance sought 

for property located at 

99 Ord Street. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/2) 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

ROBERT J. MCCARTHY VICE PRESIDENT 

MATTIE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

DOUGLAS J. EN6MANN COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 



THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks Bay be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is lessT If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
board not later than two days before the appointed hearing . 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) 

SPECIAL NOTE 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
558-4421 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 



Robert H. Feldman City and County of San Francisco 

Executive Director BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 558-4421 Room 154-A City Hall 

San Francisco, California 94102 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

CITY HALL 
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 



em-titMkiAN 

Public Library 







MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 
^QjXtUIa. WEDNESDAY, JUNE 11, 1986 



JUN 12 1986 






5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 



PUBLIC LIBRARY 

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 



APPEAL NO. VB6- 082 
J.B.M. & K. CONSTRUCTION, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



Denial on March 18, 1986, 
.Of rear yard variance sought 
for property located at 
375-1 9th Avenue. 
FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 



(5/26) 



APPEAL NO. 86-077 



FRED ARANDA, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



RONN RIDGLE, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 
HEALTH DEPARTMENT APPROVAL 

PLANNING ASSOCIATION FOR THE 
RICHMOND, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



RICHARD BRAYTON, Appellant 

vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



T Denial on March 21, 1986, of 
[permit to alter a building 
[at 4136 Fulton Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8600322. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 



(4/30) 



APPEAL NO. 86-126 



[ Protesting issuance on 

[May 5, 1986, to Oay and Juthika 

[Master, permit to alter a building 

[at 1098 Harrison Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8506385. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (6/23) 



APPEAL NO. 86-134 



TProtesting issuance on May 9, 1986 
[to Hank Lee, permit to erect a 
[structure at 150-20th Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8505620. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (6/28) 



APPEAL NO. 86-147 



[Imposition of penalty on 
[June 5, 1986, for work done 
[at 1835-37 McAllister Street 
[APPLICATION NO. 8604992. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(6/15) 



APPEAL NO. 86-146 



JUNE GARCIA, Appellant 

vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



TProtesting issuance on 

[May 27, 1986, to Helen Franco, 

[permit for Mobile Catering at 

[20 South Van Ness. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(7/14) 



APPEAL NO. 86-145 



SIDNEY SHAW, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



TProtesting issuance on 

[May 27, 1986, to Paul Rosenstiel , 

[permit to alter a building at 

[580 Alvarado Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8600770. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(7/12) 



APPEAL NO. 86-144 



TWIN PEAKS COUNCIL, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



TProtesting issuance on 

[May 19, 1986, to R. Earl Robinson, 

[permit to alter a building 

[at 123 Raccoon Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8604676. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/3) 



APPEAL NO. V86-123 



JOHN TARANTINO, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



CHARELS M. MCLAUGHLIN, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. V86. 



TDenial on May 6, 1986, of 
[rear yard variance sought for 
[property located at 
[135-135A-137-9th Avenue. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



140 

[Denial on 



(6/22) 



May 13, 1986, of 
[rear yard variance sought 
[for property located at 
[99 Ord Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(7/2) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, JUNE 11, 1986 



PAGE TWO 



APPEAL NO. V86-148 



JOE AND CATHY FRAGOLA, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



TDenial on June 5, 1986, of 
[rear yard variance sought 
[for property located at 
[220 Hartford Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(7/15) 



6.30 P.M. 



APPEAL NO. 86-098 



FRED V. HERRERA, dba "THE STONE," 

Appellant 

vs. 

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



"[ Denial on April 9, 1986, 
[of Cabaret and Dance Hall Keeper- 
[ After Hours permits at 
[412 Broadway. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/27) 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 



JERRY E. BERG 
ROBERT J. MCCARTHY 
MATT IE J. JACKSON 
DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN 
FRANK S, FUNG 



PRESIDENT 

VICE PRESIDENT 

COMMISSIONER 

COMMISSIONER 

COMMISSIONER 



DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 



THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 



The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearingT " 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
558-4421 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 



Robert H. Feldman 
Executive Director 
(415) 558-4421 



City and County of San Francisco 
BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 
Room 154-A, City Hall 



ftjini 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

CITY HALL 
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 



CITY LIBRARIAN 
Public Library 






MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 
WEDNESDAYS-JUNE 25, 1986 
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 



DOCUMENTS DEPT. 

J UN 2 41986 

SAN FRANCISCO 
PUBLIC LIBPAPV 



MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 

APPEAL NO. 86-144 



TWIN PEAKS COUNCIL, Appellant 

vs . 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO 



RONN R1DGLE, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 
HEALTH DEPARTMENT APPROVAL 



ERIC ROSENQUIST, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



TProtesting issuance on 

[May 29, 1986, to R. Earl 

[Robinson, permit to alter 

[a building at 123 Raccoon 

[Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8604676. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY 

86-126 

TProtesting issuance on 



(7/3) 



[May 5, 1986, to Jay and Juthika 
[Master, permit to alter a building 
[at 1098 Harrison Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8506385. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (6/2) 



APPEAL NO. V85-309 



APPEAL NO 



FM PRODUCTION, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



"[Denial on November 1, 1985, 
[of Rear Yard Variance sought 
[for property located at 
[3728-30 Taraval Street. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 

86-097 

Tlmposition of penalty on 



(12/28/85) 



[April 11, 1986, for work done 

[at 999 Brannan Street. 

[CHARGE NOTICE NO. 09340 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/24) 



APPEAL NO. 86-156 



JIM D. KOSKI, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



Tlmposition of penalty on 
[June 10, 1986, for work done 
[at 1680 Fulton Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8604364. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(7/20) 



FRANKLIN 



POLICE 




i "is 



APPEAL NO 
HILTON, dba "0SAKA SPA, 11 
/Appellant 

RTMENT, Respc/ndent \T 



86-101 




APPEAL NO 



MARIO EVOLA, dba "MARIO'S SERVICE," 

Appellant 
vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



TDenial on 7 April 9, 198b, of 
[Massage ytstabl ishmeny permit 
[at 548 /ones Street 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



86-132 

["Revocation on May 7, 1986, of 



(5/28) 



MYRON MU, dba "THE SALOON," Appellant 

vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



[permit for Tow Car Operator 
[at 735 Filbert Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 

APPE AL NO. 86-157 

["Denial on June 2, 1986, of 



(6/28) 



APPEAL NO 



CHARLES GILLAN, Appellant 
0) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



[Dance Hall Keeper permit at 
[1232 Grant Avenue. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 

86-124 

TDenial on May 13, 1986, of 
[permit to alter a building 
[at 2074 Jackson Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8604675. 



(7/11) 



(6/22) 






BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS HEARING OF JUNE 25, 1986 



PAGE TWO 



l) 



JERRY BERNSTEIN, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 86-135 

[Denial on May 19, 1986, of 
[permit to alter a building 
[at 625 Ashbury Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8604410. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(6/28) 



PAMELA MENDALA, Appellant 
2) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 86- 



139 

"[Protesting issuance on May 21 
[1986, to George E. Becker, 
[permit to alter a building at 
[513 Liberty Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8601906. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(7/1) 



APPEAL NO. 86-150 



MARILYN SUE LEE, Appellant 
3) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



CHARLES H. VAUGHN, Appellant 
4) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



TTProtesting issuance on 
[May 27, 1986, to Vladimir & 
[Stella Raukhman, permit to 
[alter a building at 
[1320 Anza Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8601108. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(7/14) 



APPEAL NO. 86-151 



"[Protesting issuance on 
[May 27, 1986, to Carole 
[Raymond Chu, permit to 
[demolish a building at 
[5426 California Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8605564 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(7/21) 



APPEAL NO. 86-152 



5) 



RICHARD AND KATHLEEN KEENAN, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



"[Protesting issuance on 
[May 29, 1986, to Rose Fergus, 
[permit to erect a structure at 
[127-15th Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8604272. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(7/19) 



ELAINE EMERSON, Appellant 
6) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



JOHN TARANTINO, Appellant 
7) vs. 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 86-154 

"[Protesting issuance on 
[May 29, 1986, to James Lee, 
[permit to alter a building 
[at 1010 Bush Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 860329. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 

APPEAL NO. V86-123 

[Denial on May 6, 1986, of 



(7/19) 



APPEAL NO 



RHONI KAHN, Appellant 
L8) vs. 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



[Rear Yard Variance sought for 

[property located at 

[135-135A-137 9th Avenue. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/22) 

86-149 

[Order to Cease Violation of 



[the Planning Code, dated 
[May 27, 1986, for property 
[at 250 Beach Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(7/15) 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 
JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 



ROBERT J. MCCARTHY 
MATT IE J. JACKSON 
DOUGLAS J, ENGMANN 
FRANK S, FUNG 



VICE PRESIDENT 
COMMISSIONER 
COMMISSIONER 
COMMISSIONER 



DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 



THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing . 



The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
558-4421 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 



Robert H. Feldman 
Executive Director 
(415) 558-4421 



City and County of San Francisco 

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

Room 154-A, City Hall 

San Francisco, California 94102 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

CITY HALL 
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 



CITY LIBRARIA N \j\irX_ 
Public Library * 



* 2. 



» CjLpc. , 

MEETING OF THE BOARD OE-^ PERM IT APPEALS 
WEDNESDAY;- JULY 2, 1986 
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 



JUL P^ 986 

BAN PKANOISOO 
PUBUC UBRARY 



MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 



APPEAL NO 



J.B.M. & K. CONSTRUCTION, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



86-082 

[Denial on March 18, 1986, 
[of Rear Yard Variance sought 
[for property located at 



[375-19th Avenue. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY 



(5/26) 



APPEAL NO. 86-144 



TWIN PEAKS COUNCIL, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 86- 



JERRY BERNSTEIN, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



MARILYN SUE LEE, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



"[Protesting issuance on 

[May 29, 1986, to R. Earl 

[Robinson, permit to alter 

[a building at 123 Raccoon 

[Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8604676. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 

135 

"[Denial on May 19, 1986, of 

[permit to alter a building 

[at 625 Ashbury Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8604410. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 



(7/3) 



(6/28) 



APPEAL NO. 86-150 



TJProtesting issuance on 
[May 27, 1986, to Vladimir & 
[Stella Raukhman, permit to 
[alter a building at 
[1320 Anza Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8601108. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 



(7/14) 



APPEAL NO. 86-152 



RICHARD AND KATHLEEN KEENAN, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



T/Protesting issuance on 

[May 29, 1986, to Rose Fergus, 

[permit to erect a structure at 

[127-15th Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8604272. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY (7/19) 



APPE AL NO. 86-159 

"[Revocation on April 11, 1986, 



BYUNG SOON HUNT, dba "OSAKA MASSAGE 
PARLOR," Appellant 

vs. 
SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT, 

Respondent 

APPEAL NO 86-163 

"[Protesting issuance on 



[of permit for Outcall Massage 
[Service and Massage Establishment 
[at 548 Jones Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/22) 



RICHARD GOSSEN, Appellant 



vs 



DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



[June 16, 1986, to Peter Haramis, 

[permit to alter a building at 

[270 Columbus Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8605723. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/29) 



APPEAL NO. V86-140 



CHARLES M. MCLAUGHLIN, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



[Denial on May 13, 1986, of 
[Rear Yard Variance sought 
[for property located at 
[99 Ord Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(7/2) 



LAWRENCE LO, Appellant 
10) vs . 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



APPEAL NO 



V86-1 69 

[Denial on June 12, 1986, 

[of Rear Yard Variance sought 

[for property at 464-1/2 Filbert 

[Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(8/2) 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS HEARING, JULY 2, 1986 PAGE TWO 



APPEAL NO. 86-126 

„,„„,,- , 11= „ + "[Protesting issuance on 

RONN RIDGLE, Appellant ^ ^ 1 g | 6 ^ t0 Jay and Jutnika 

) vs - „ TMaster Dermit to alter a building 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent at 1098 Harrison Street. 

FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION NO 8506385. 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL L T0DAY _ (6/2) 

HEALTH DEPARTMENT APPROVAL L ru * ru 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

ROBERT J, MCCARTHY VICE PRESIDENT 

MATTIE J, JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S, FUNG COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 



THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing . 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days -prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
558-4421 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 



Robert H. Feldman City and County of San Francisco 

Executive Director BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 558-4421 Room 154-A, City Hall 

San Francisco, California 94102 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

CITY HALL 
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 , 



Public Library 




MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS ul 141986 
WEDNESDAY, JULY 16, 1986 A1VI _ 

.« . KAIMC1SCO 

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL -..c library 



MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 

APPEAL NO. V86-082 
J.B.M.& K. CONSTRUCTION, Appellant [TJenial on March 18, 1986, of 

vs. [Rear Yard Variance sought 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [for property located at 

[375-1 9th Avenue. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (5/26) 

APPEAL NO. 86-144 
TWIN PEAKS COUNCIL, Appellant [Protesting issuance on 

vs. [May 29, 1986, to R. Earl 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Robinson, permit to 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [alter a building at 

[123 Raccoon Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8604676. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (7/3) 

APPEALS 86-168 AND 86-170 TO BE HEARD TOGETHER HAVING SUBJECT MATTER COMMON TO BOTH. 

APPEAL NO. 86-168 
MICHAEL PIETRO, Appellant [/Protesting issuance on 

vs. [June 16, 1986, to S.F. Parking 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Authority, permit to erect a 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [structure at 2055 Lombard Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8511965. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/2) 

APPEAL NO. 86-170 
CHARLES E. AND FLORIAN MOORE, Appellants [Protesting issuance on 

vs. [June 16, 1986, to S.F. Parking 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Authority, permit to erect a 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [structure at 2055 Lombard Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8511965. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/3) 

APPEAL NO. 86-155 
JOSEPH F. SIMON, Appellant ["Denial on June 5, 1986, of 

vs. [permit to alter a building 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [at 1725 Haight Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8601609. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/19) 

APPEAL NO. 86-161 
WILLIAM TRISTANT, Appellant [Denial on June 12, 1986, of 

vs. [permit to alter a building 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [at 2960 California Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8601938. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/29) 

APPEAL NO. 86-172 
WILLIAM TALMADGE, JR., Appellant [Denial on June 26, 1986, of 

vs. [permit to alter a building at 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [2898-23rd Street. 

CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8603322. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/5) 

APPEALS 86-166 AND 86-167 TO BE HEARD TOGETHER HAVING SUBJECT MATTER COMMON TO BOTH. 

APPEAL NO. 86-166 
HUGH A. AND EILEEN D0N0H0E, Appellants TProtesting issuance on 
vs. 



.June 10, 1986, to William and 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Lois Yen, permit to alter a 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [building at 1358-26th Avenue. 

"APPLICATION NO. 8602203. 

= F0R HEARING TODAY. (7/30) 



I 






BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS HEARING, JULY 16, 1986 PAGE TWO 

APPEAL NO. 86-167 
JANET KEARNS, Appellant ~~ ["Protesting issuance on 

vs. [June 10, 1986, to William and 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Lois Yen, permit to alter 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [a building at 1358-26th Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8602203. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/30) 

APPEAL NO. 86-164 
RUSSELL ABRAMSON, et al , Appellants! [Protesting issuance on June 11, 1986, 

vs. [to Colonial Construction Company, 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [permit to alter a building at 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [1000 Corbett Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8601703. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/29) 



APPEAL NO. 86-165 

ELLIS L. WEBSTER, Appellant ["Protesting issuance on 

I vs. [June 12, 1986, to Dr. Simon 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Sterzer, permit to alter a 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [building at 67 Clarendon Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8604629. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/30) 






APPEAL NO. 86-173 
RAY CHAVEZ, Appellant [Protesting issuance on 

vs. [February 13, 1986, (suspended 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [June 18, 1986 for appealing) to 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Francisco Madriz, permit to alter 

[a building at 1175 Folsom Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8513276. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/7) 

APPEAL NO. 86-174 
OCEAN BEACH HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION^ [Protesting issuance on 

Appellant [June 18, 1986, to Joseph Chen, 

vs. [permit to alter a building 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [at 855 La Playa, No. 462. 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8605489. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/9) 

APPEAL NO. 86-175 

ELAINE EMERSON, Appellant fProtesting issuance on 

vs. [June 24, 1986, to James Lee, 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [permit to alter a building 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [at 1010 Bush Street. 

DAHI APPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8604254. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/9) 

APPEAL NO. V86-104 
JOHN PICKERING, Appellant [Denial on April 8, 1986, 

vs. [of Off-Street Parking Variance 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [sought for property located at 

[109 Douglass Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/28) 

APPEAL NO. V86-160 
STEPHEN COHEN, Appellant [Denial on June 6, 1986, of 

vs. [Off-Street Parking Variance 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [sought for property located at 

[1840-46 Van Ness Avenue. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/26) 

APPEAL NO. V86-162 
JEAN NAGY, Appellant Protesting imposition of condition 

vs. [in granting of Rear Yard Variance 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [sought, on June 9, 1986, for 

[property located at 626A Rhode 
[Island Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/29) 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS HEARING, JULY 16, 1986 PAGE THREE 

APPEAL NO. V86-171 
ENCARNACION RAMOS, Appellant TDenial on June 17, 1986, 

vs. [of Off-Street Parking Variance 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [sought for property located at 

[1620 Broadway Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/7) 






MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

ROBERT J. MCCARTHY VICE PRESIDENT 

MATT IE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 



THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 

BOARD Or PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shell be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person frorr whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks Bay be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall b£ the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
board not later than two days before the appointed hearing . 

The board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the board no later than two days -prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before their 
unless a Commissioner is excused frorr voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Keilec notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days Drior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
roon,, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the board office at 
551-4421 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 



Robert H. Feldman City and County of San Francisco 

Executive Director BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 5SB-4421 Room 154-A. City Hall 

San Francisco, California 94102 



SOABD OF PEi i (IT AflP EALS 

CITY HALL 
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 




£ITY LIBRARIAN 
Public Library 



:b 



/ 



SP] 






MEETING OF THE BOARD QF^PERMIT APPEALS DOCutiiiifiM &£p T 

WEDNESDAY, JULY 25, 1986 

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL ^ ' * mQ 

6AAJ F«Af;g w 

PUBLIC USRAaX 

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 



ERIC ROSENQUIST, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



J.B.M.& K. CONSTRUCTION, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. V85-309 

[Denial on November 1, 1985, 
[of Rear Yard Variance sought 
[for property located at 
[3728-30 Taraval Street. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 

APPEAL NO. V86-082 

[Denial on March 18, 1986, of 



(12/28/85) 



APPEAL NO 



LAWRENCE LO, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



[Rear Yard Variance sought 
[for property located at 
[375-1 9th Avenue. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 

V86-169 

TDenial on June 12, 1986, 
[of Rear Yard Variance sought 
[for property located at 
[464-1/2 Filbert Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(5/26) 



(8/2) 



FRANKLIN E. HILTON, 



POLICE 



vs. 

DEPARTMENT, 



APPEAL 
dba "OSAKA SPAT 11 
Appellant 

Respondent 



NO. 86-101 



APPEAL NO 
EDUARDO URREA, dba "SOCIEDAD GARDELIANA 
USA," Appellant 

vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



"TDenial on April 9, 1986, 
[of Massage Establishment permit 
[at 548 Jones Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 

86-153 

^"Denial on June 2, 1986, of 
[Place of Entertainment permit 
[at 3441 Mission Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(5/28) 



(7/19) 



NEIGHBORHOOD PALS OF OAKLAND, Appellants 

vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 86-180 

[/Suspension on June 24, 1986, 



[of Charitable Organization 
[permit at 936 Geary Boulevard 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(8/16) 



APPEAL NO 



YOLANDA JUZIX, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



86-179 

~" [Protesting issuance on 
[June 24, 1986, to Robert J. Gulbech, 
[permit to alter a building at 
[825 Cayuga Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8601171. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/15) 



APPEAL NO. 86-181 



FRANK VAN ORDEN, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO 



MILLIE E. MCCALLUM, Appellant 
) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



"[Protesting issuance on 
[July 2, 1986, to Dan Viducich, 
[permit to alter a building 
[at 1635-20th Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8603403. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 

86-182 

[Protesting issuance on 
[June 16, 1986, to Jan and Diana 
[permit to demolish a building 
[at 446-21st Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8606141. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(8/17) 



Tang, 



(8/18) 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS HEARING, JULY 23, 1986 PAGE TWO 

APPEAL NOS. 66-177, 86-183, 86-184, and 86-187 TO BE HEARD TOGETHER HAVING SUBJECT 
MATTER IN COMMON. 

APPEAL NO. 86-177 



P. THEODORE ANDERSON, Appellant "[Protesting issuance on 

vs. [June 26, 1986, to Martin Ryan, 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [permit to alter a building 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [at 423 Quintara Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8605019. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/12) 

APPEAL NO. 86-183 



P. THEODORE ANDERSON, Appellant " "[Protesting issuance on 

vs. [July 2, 1986, to William F. Spiers, 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [permit to erect a structure 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [at 435 Quintara Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8604341. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/18) 

APPEAL NO. 86-184 



P. THEODORE ANDERSON, Appellant " "[Protesting issuance on 

vs. [July 2, 1986, to William F. Spiers, 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [permit to erect a structure 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [at 441 Quintara Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8604340. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/18) 

APPEAL NO. 86-187 



P. THEODORE ANDERSON, Appellant " "[Protesting issuance on 

vs. [July 9, 1986, to Paul Dohty, 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [permit to erect a structure at 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [431 Quintara Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8603898. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/26) 

APPEAL NO. 86-185 



LORENZO MURPHY, Appellant [Order to Cease Violation of 

vs. [the Planning Code, dated 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [July 3, 1986, for property at 

[2586-90 Folsom Street and 
[3014-22nd Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/20) 

APPEAL NOS. 86-149 AND 86-178 TO BE HEARD TOGETHER HAVING SUBJECT MATTER COMMON TO BOTH 

APPEAL NO. 86-149 
RHONI KAHN, Appellant [Order to Cease Violation of 

vs. [the Planning Code dated 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [May 27, 1986, for property 

[at 250 Beach Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/15) 

APPEAL NO. 86-178 



CATHERINE TOURUBASOFF, Appellant [Order to Cease Violation of 

vs. [the Planning : Code, dated 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [May 27, 1986, for property 

[at 250 Beach Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/12) 

APPEAL NO. 86-176 



ALDO R. LUCCHESI, JR. & ANN B. RAMSEY, "[Denial on June 23, 1986, 

Appellants [of permit to alter a building 

) vs. [at 3133-37 Broderick Street. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [APPLICATION NO. 8407250. 

CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL [FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/11) 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 



JERRY E. BERG 
ROBERT J, MCCARTHY 
MATTIE J, JACKSON 
DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN 
FRANK S. FUNG 



PRESIDENT 

VICE PRESIDENT 

COMMISSIONER 

COMMISSIONER 

COMMISSIONER 



DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 



THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing . 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
558-4421 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 



Robert H. Feldman 
Executive Director 
(415) 558-4421 



City and County of San Francisco 

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

Room 154-A, City Hall 

San Francisco, California 94102 







- CITY LIDMUU AM-, 
Public Library 



P30 






(huj&-> 



'T 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

WEDNESDAY^AUGUST 15, 1986 

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 



DOCUMENTS DEi 

AUG 81986 

SAN FRANCISCO 
PUBLIC LIBRARY 



MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 

APPEAL NO. 86_-Q99 



;ity and County of San Francisco 



Board of Permit Appeals 




NOTICE OF CHANGES IN MEETING SCHEDULE 



DOCUMENTS DEPT. 

JUL 2 9 1986 

SAN FRANCISCO 
PUBLIC LIBRADV 



The Board of Permit Appeals has cancelled the regular meetings of 
July 30, and August 6, 1986. The next regular meeting will be 
Wednesday, August 13, 1986 in Room 282, City Hall. The cases originally 
scheduled for August 6, 1986, have been rescheduled for a Special Meeting 
on Thursday, August 14, 1986, in Room 228, City Hall . 

For further information call the Board office at 558-4421. 



JULY 25, 1986 




Robert H. Feldm 



ecutive Director 



(415) 558-4421 



Room 154- A City Hall 



San Francisco 94102 



P30 



OjUjL^ 



:T 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

WEDNESDAY^AUGUST 15, 1986 

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 



DOCUMENTS DEPT. 

AUG 81386 

SAN FRANClbCO 
PUBLIC UBRAPV 



MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 



APPEAL NO. 86-D99 



RAMON GREGORY HERNANDEZ, dha "LA BELLA 
MASSAGE," Appellant 

vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



APPEAL NO 



FRANKLIN E. HILTON, dba "OSAKA SPAT 

Appel lant 



vs 



POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



APPEAL NO 



NEIGHBORHOOD PALS OF OAKLAND, Appellant 

vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



TDenial on April 16, 1986, of 
[Massage Establishment permit at 
[451 O'Farrell Street. On Rer,;and 
[from Superior Court. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 

86-101 

^Denial on April 9, 1986, 

[of Massage Establishment permit 

[at 548 Jones Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/28) 

86-180 

"[Suspension on June 24, 1986, 



[of Charitable Organization 
[permit at 936 Geary Blvd 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(8/16) 



APPEALS NOS. 86-149, 86-178, 86-189, AND 86-191 TO BE HEARD TOGETHER HAVING SUBJECT 
MATTER IN COMMON. 



RHONI KAHN, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



CATHERINE TOURUBASOFF, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



STANLEY ROTH, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



MICHAEL HUGHES, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 86-149 

~[0rder to Cease Violation of 
[the Planning Code dated 
[May 27, 1986, for property 
[at 250 Beach Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 

APPEAL NO. 86-178 

"[Order to Cease Violation of 
[the Planning Code, dated 
[May 27, 1986, for property 
[at 250 Beach Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 

86-189 

[Order to Cease Violation of 
[the Planning Code, dated 
[May 27, 1986, for property at 
[250 Beach Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 

86-191 

~~ [Order to Cease Violation of 
[the Planning Code, dated 
[May 27, 1986, for property at 
[250 Beach Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(7/15) 



(8/12) 



APPEAL NO 



(8/26) 



APPEAL NO 



(8/26) 



APPEALS NOS. 86-177, 86-183, 86-184, 86-187 and 86-196 TO BE HEARD TOGETHER HAVING 
SUBJECT MATTER IN COMMON. 



P. THEODORE ANDERSON, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO 



86-177 

["Protesting issuance on 
[June 26, 1986, to Martin Ryan, 
[permit to erect a building 
[at 423 Quintara Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8605019. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(8/12) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, AUGUST 13, 1986 



PAGE TWO 



APPEAL NO. 86-183 



P. THEODORE ANDERSON, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



"[/Protesting issuance on 

[July 2, 1986, to William F. Spiers, 

[permit to erect a structure 

[at 435 Quintara Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8604341. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/18) 



APPEAL NO. 86-184 



P. THEODORE ANDERSON, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



"["Protesting issuance on 

[July 2, 1986 , to William F. Spiers, 

[permit to erect a structure 

[at 441 Quintara Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8604340. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/18) 



APPEAL NO. 86-187 



P. THEODORE ANDERSON, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



"[^Protesting issuance on 
[July 9, 1986, to Paul Dohty, 
[permit to erect a structure at 
[431 Quintara Street 
[APPLICATION NO. 8603898. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/26) 



APPEAL NO. 86-196 



P. THEODORE ANDERSON, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



ALDO R. LUCCHESI, JR. & ANN B. 

Appellants 
vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



LORENZO MURPHY, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



APPEAL NO 
RAMSEY 



APPEAL NO 



APPEAL NO 



ERIC ROSENQUIST, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



""[Protesting issuance on 
[July 18, 1986, to Sean Roche, 
[permit to erect a structure at 
[2110-14th Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8604801. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 

86-176 

[Denial on June 23, 1986, 
[of permit to alter a building 
[at 3133-37 Broderick Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8407250. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 

86-185 

"TOrder to Cease Violation of 
[the Planning Code, dated 
[July 3, 1986, for property at 
[2586-90 Folsom Street and 
[3014-22nd Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 

, V85-309 

[Denial on November 1, 1985, 
[of Rear Yard Variance sought 
[for property located at 
[3728-30 Taraval Street. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 



(9/4) 



(8/11) 



(8/20) 



(12/23 



/35) 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

ROBERT J, MCCARTHY VICE PRESIDENT 

MATTIE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

DOUGLAS J, ENGMANN COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing . 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
558-4421 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 



Robert H. Feldman City and County of San Francisco 

Executive Director BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 558-4421 Room 154-A, City Hall 

San Francisco, California 94102 



If 

2 



CfocJ** 



NOTE SPECIAL TIME AND PLACE 
SPECIAL 



-5F 

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

THURSDAY. AUGUST 14, 198E 

5:00 P.M., ROOM 228, CITY HALL 



DOCUMENTS DEPT 

AUG 81986 

SAN FRANCISCO 
PUBLIC LIBRaov 



MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 



APPEAL NO. 86-151 



CHARLES H. VAUGHN, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



"[Protesting issuance on 
[May 27, 1986, to Carole 
[and Raymond Chu, permit 
[demolish a building at 
[5426 California Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8605564. 
[FOR REHEARING TODAY. 



to 



(7/21) 



APPEAL NO. 86-186 



JACK P. VOGNSEN, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



MANHAL JWEINAT, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



DIANA SCHERER, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
DAHI DISAPPROVAL 



ROBERT STRAND, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



[Denial on July 16, 1986, of 
[permit to alter a building 
[at 114 Belgrave Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8513630. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(8/25) 



APPEAL NO. 86-193 



TDenial on July 11 , 1986, of 
[permit to alter a building at 
[1101 Stanyan Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8606374. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(8/30) 



APPEAL NO. 86-198 



[Denial on July 29, 1986, 
[of permit to alter a building 
[at 2277-79 Green Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8602159. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(9/7) 



APPEAL NO. 86-201 



TDenial on July 25, 1986, 
[of permit to alter a building 
[at 2911 Pine Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8603465 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(9/8) 



APPEAL NO. 86-190 



WILLIAM LERRIGO AND BRYAN ROBERTS, 

Appellants 
vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 
[July 14, 1986, to Rodney C. 
[Giannini, permit to alter a 
[building at 586 Sanchez Street 
[APPLICATION NO. 8604442. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(8/26) 



APPEAL NO. 86-195 



RICHARD T. PARKS, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



"[Protesting issuance on 
[July 14, 1986, to Thomas A. 
[Robertson and Judy John, permit 
[to alter a building at 14 Le Roy 
[Place. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8602658 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/31) 



APPEAL NO. 86-197 



STEPHEN E. KELLOGG, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 
DEPT. OF PUBLIC HEALTH APPROVAL 



"[Protesting issuance on 
[July 18, 1986, to Day Y. Tsuei , 
[permit to alter a building at 
[335-339 Noe Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8509801. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/7) 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS HEARING, AUGUST 14, 1986 PAGE TWO 

APPEAL NO. 86-199 
ANTONINA BOLSHAKOVA, Appellant [Protesting issuance on 

vs. [July 23, 1986, to Cornelius 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Keighran, permit to demolish 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [a building at 1650-lOth Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8604541. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/7) 

APPEAL NO. 86-200 



THOMAS AND INEZ MULVIHILL, AppelTants [Protesting issuance on 

vs. [July 21, 1986, to Robert Ko, 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [permit to alter a building at 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [610 Moraga Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8601660. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/7) 

APPEAL NO. 86-188 
TONY GHENO, Appellant [Order to Cease Violation of 

vs. [the Planning Code, dated July 9, 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [1986, for property at 

[1340 Bryant Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/26) 

APPEAL NO. 86-192 
CELSO A. RUPERTO, Appellant [Order to Cease Violation of 

vs. [the Planning Code, dated 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [July 11, 1986, for property at 

[164 Turk Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/26) 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 



JERRY E. BERG 
ROBERT J. MCCARTHY 
MATT IE J, JACKSON 
DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN 
FRANK S. FUNG 



PRESIDENT 

VICE PRESIDENT 

COMMISSIONER 

COMMISSIONER 

COMMISSIONER 



DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 



THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

Tjie order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing . 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
558-4421 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 



Robert H. Feldman 
Executive Director 
(415) 558-4421 



City and County of San Francisco 

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

Room 154- A, City Hall 

San Francisco, California 94102 



S&ABDOF - SIT M \ ^ALS 

CITY HALL 
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94f®2 




tftu^a 



-£f- TV LIBRA RIA N 
Public Library 



el 



X 






i\Gesu^v] 



MEETING OF THE BOARD. .OF PERMIT APPEALS 
WEDNESDAY, /UGUST 27, 1S86 
5:00 P.M., RQOft 228, CITY HALL 



MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 



ROBERT STRAND, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 86-201 



[Denial on July 25, 1986, of 
[permit to alter a building 
r at 2911 Pine Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8603465. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 



APPEAL NO. 86-200 
THOMAS AND INEZ MULVIHILL, Appellants [Protesting issuance on July 21 

vs. DOCUMENTS DEPT. [1986, to Robert Ko, permit to 



(9/8) 



DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



AUG 2 5 : 



PUBLIC LIBRARY 

APPEAL NO. 86-204 



[alter a building at 
[610 Morago Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8601660. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 



(9/7) 



JANET L. LEIVA, Appellant 

vs . 
DEPT. PUBLICWORKS, Respondent 



APPEAL NO, 
MICHAEL GARZA, dba "A C AUTO WRECKER'S," 



[Appealing for refund of 

[penalty imposed on August 1, 1986, 

[for work done at 4604-1 8th Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8606396. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/10) 



86-205 



Appellant 



vs 



POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



TDenial on July 23, 1986, 
[of Auto Wrecker and Second Hand 
[Dealer-State permit at 1201 
[Van Dyke Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(9/10) 



APPEAL NO. 86-213 



LAWRENCE MARCELINO, dba "NATIONAL 
FEDERATION OF THE BLIND OF CALIFORNIA," 

Appellant 
vs . 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



[Revocation on July 28, 1986, 
[of Charitable Organization- 
[ Certificate of Registration, 
[Number 0020. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



APPEAL NO. 86-161 



WILLIAM TRISTANT, Appellant 

vs . 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



TDenial on June 12, 1986, of 
[permit to alter a building 
[at 2960 California Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8601938. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



APPEAL NO. 86-194 



FREDERICK SCHWARTZ, EXECUTOR, 

Appellant 
vs . 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



TDenial on July 21, 1986, 
[of permit to alter a building 
[at 60-62-621 Carwelita Street 
[APPLICATION NO. 8608756. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(9/21) 



(7/29) 



(8/31) 



ESTER S. BERGER, Appellant 

vs . 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



PIERO BOSCACCI, Appellant 
)) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
DAHI DISAPPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 86-206 



TDenial on August 1, 1986, 
[of permit to alter a building 
[at 3015 Van Ness Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8513229. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



APPEAL NO. 86-207 



TDenial on August 4, 1986, 
[of permit to alter a building 
[at 1520-22A Lombard Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8606023. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(9/10) 



(9/13) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, AUGUST 27, 1986 



PAGE TWO 



APPEAL NO. 86-208 



MICHAEL B. BASSI, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



JOHN ROBIN ORME, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



TDenial on August 1, 1986, 
[of permit to alter a building 
[at 45 Almaden Court. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8605365. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(9/13) 



APPEAL NO. 86-202 



[Protesting issuance on 

[July 22, 1986, to Frank Cafferkey, 

[permit to erect a building 

[at 1517-20th Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8602622. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/9) 



APPEAL NO. 86-203 



JOAN IRVIN & MARY MACHLE, Appellants 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



TProtesting issuance on 
[December 20, 1986, to Roy 
[Heidtmann & Robert Sokol , 
[permit to alter a building at 
[137 Caselli Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8504252. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(9/10) 



APPEAL NO. 86-209 



SETH MOSGOFIAN, Appellant 
\) vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



[Protesting determination by the 
[Zoning Administrator on July 24, 
[1986, that the suspension for 
[building permits should be 
[lifted after the filing of a new 
[building permit application and 
[a variance by Mr* Rick Sneed for 
[the property at 233-237 Upper Terrace. 
[APPLICATION NOS. 8406594 and 8504928. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/13) 



APPEAL NO. 86-211 



SETH MOSGOFIAN, Appellant 
3) vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on July 29, 

[1986, to Sneed & Company, Construction 

[Inc., permit to alter a building 

[at 235A Upper Terrace. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8601328. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/16) 



APPEAL NO. 86-212 



MARY PETRIANOS, Appellant 
) vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



LAWRENCE LO, Appellant 
) vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



"[Protesting issuance on July 29, 1986, 
[to Mei San Wong, permit to alter a 
[building at 576-47th Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8606427. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/16) 



APPEAL NO. V86-169 



TDenial on June 12, 1986, of 
[Rear Yard Variance sought 
[for property located at 
[464| Filbert Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(8/2) 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

ROBERT J. MCCARTHY VICE PRESIDENT 

MATT IE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing . 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
558-4421 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 



Robert H. Feldman " .—1 - _- City and County of San Francisco 

Executive Director" BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 558-4421 Room 154-A, City Hall 

San Francisco, California 94102 






*% U $ r **' Jm rf/0( 



;;^ 






?30 



Qjft^LjU* 



^>F 



DOCUMENTS DEPT. 

UP 1 1 1986 

SAN FgANOldOO 
PUBLIC LIBRARY 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 10, 1986 
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 



MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 



APPEAL NO. 86-161 



WILLIAM TRISTANT, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



TDenial on June 12, 1986, 
[of permit to Alter a Building 
[at 2960 California Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8601938. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(7/29) 



APPEAL NO. 86-219 



JOSE MARTIN, 

vs 

DEPT. PUBLIC 



Appellant 

WORKS, Respondent 






Tlmposition of penalty on 
[August 15, 1986, for work 
[done at 33 Persia Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8513119. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(9/24) 



APPEAL NO. 86-214 



MIKE T. BANDUCCI 



POLICE 



vs. 
DEPARTMENT, 



dba "B AND A 
Appellant 

Respondent 



TOWING," 



[Denial on July 28, 1986, 
[Tow Car Operator permit, 
[1560 Folsom Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



of 

at 



(9/17) 



APPEAL NO. 86-216 



HUNG LE, Appellant 

vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



TDenial on July 22, 1986, of 
[Massage Establishment permit, at 
[931 Kearney Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(9/21) 



APPEAL NO. 86-222 



LEON PORTNOY, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. OF PUBLIC HEALTH, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



TDenial on August 12, 1986, of 
[permit to Operate a Push Cart at 
[768 Sansome Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(10/1) 



APPEAL NO. 86-221 



JOHN E. BARBEY, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



TDenial on August 22, 1986, of 
[permit to Alter a Building at 
[50 Liberty Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8609377. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(10/1) 



APPEAL NO. 86-224 



SUE LOWE, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



P. THEODORE ANDERSON, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



TProtesting issuance on August 14, 
[1986, of permit to Alter a Building 
[at 5201 Third Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8606805. 



[FOR HEARING TODAY 



(10/5) 



APPEAL NO. 86-217 



TProtesting issuance on August 4, 
[1986, to John Lau, of permit to 
[Erect a Structure at 
[447 Quintara Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8607133. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(9/20) 



APPEAL NO. 86-218 



AGNES & KLAUS MURER, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



TProtesting issuance on August 6, 
[1986, to Gustav & Dorothy Knecht, 
[of permit to Alter a Building at 
[17 Bret Harte Terrace. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8607524. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(9/24) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, SEPTEMBER 10, 1986 PAGE TWO 

APPEAL NO. 84-269 

SAN FRANCISCANS FOR REASONABLE GROWTH [Protesting issuance on 

AND THE NORTH OF MARKET PLANNING [October 11, 1984, to Trinity 

COALITION, Appellants [Properties, permit to Erect 

vs. - [a Structure at 1145 Market Street. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [APPLICATION NO. 8200517. 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [FOR HEARING TODAY. (10/11/84) 

APPEAL NO. 86-215 
STEPHEN A. SHERWIN, Appellant [Protesting issuance on 

vs. [July 31, 1986, to Christopher 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Allick, of permit to Alter a 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Building at 3317 Washington Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8607617. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/17) 

APPEAL NO. V86-220 
BILL LIM AND BILL YUEN, Appellant ["Denial on August 6, 1986, 

vs. [of Rear Yard Variance sought for 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [property located at 793-37th 

[Avenue. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/27) 






MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

ROBERT J, MCCARTHY VICE PRESIDENT 

MATTIE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing . 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
558-4421 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 



Robert H. Feldman City and County of San Francisco 

Executive Director BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 558-4421 Room 154-A, City Hall 

San Francisco, California 94102 









SCARDOF- PtAU 

CITY MALL 
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94*02 



koj 



6MM*rU/i/7h 



Public Library 



Z DOCUMENTS DEPT. 

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS SEP 17 1986 
WEDNESDAY; SEPTEMBER 17, 1986 eAfcI . 

/O />/ W > SAN FRANCISCO 

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL • public librarv 

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 

APPEAL NO. 84-269 

SAN FRANCISCANS FOR REASONABLE GROWTH protesting issuance on 

AND THE NORTH OF MARKET PLANNING [October 11, 1984, to Trinity 

COALITION, Appellants [Properties, permit to Erect 

vs. [a Structure at 1145 Market Street. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [APPLICATION NO. 8200517. 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (10/11/84) 

APPEAL NO. 86-212 
MARY PETRIANOS, Appellant protesting issuance on July 29, 

vs. [1986, to Mei San Wong, permit to 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Alter a Building at 576-47th Avenue. 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8606427. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (9/16) 

APPEAL NO. 86-213 
LAWRENCE MARCELINO, dba "NATIONAL [Revocation on July 28, 1986, of 

FEDERATION OF THE BLIND OF CALIFORNIA," [Charitable Organization-Certificate 

Appellant [of Registration, Number 0020. 

vs. [FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/21) 

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 

APPEAL NO. 86-149 
RHONI KAHN, Appellant [Drder to Cease Violation of 

vs. [the Planning Code dated 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [May 27, 1986, for property 

[at 250 Beach Street. 
[FOR REHEARING TODAY. (7/15) 

APPEAL NO. 86-178 
CATHERINE TOURUBAROFF, Appellant [Order to Cease Violation of 

vs. [the Planning Code, dated 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [May 27, 1986, for property 

[at 250 Beach Street. 
[FOR REHEARING TODAY. (8/12) 

APPEAL NO. 86-172 
WILLIAM TALMADGE, JR., Appellant [Denial on June 26, 1986, of permit 

vs. [to Alter a Building at 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [2898-23rd Street. 

CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8603322. 

[FOR REHEARING TODAY. (8/5) 

APPEAL NO. 86-193 
MANHAL JWEINAT, Appellant [Denial on July 11, 1986, of 

vs. [permit to Alter a Building at 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [1101 Stanyan Street. 

CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8606374. 

[FOR REHEARING TODAY. (8/30) 

APPEAL NO. 86-225 
VICTOR GONZALEZ, Appellant ["Appealing for Refund of Penalty 

vs. [imposed on August 27, 1986, for 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [work done at 3012 Fillmore Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8608935. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (10/6) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, SEPTEMBER 17, 1986 PAGE TWO 



APPEAL NO. 86-194 



FREDERICK SCHWARTZ, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



[Denial on July 21, 1986, of 
[permit to Alter a Building at 
[60-62-621 Carmelita Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8608756. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY.. 



APPEAL NO. 86-207 



PIERO BOSCACCI, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
DAHI DISAPPROVAL 



ILYAS ABSAR, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



WAH KUEY YEE & ARTHUR T. CHAN, 

Appellant 
vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



TONY GHENO, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



TDenial on August 4, 1986, of 
[permit to Alter a Building at 
[1520-22A Lombard Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8606023. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



APPEAL NO. 86-210 



(9/5) 



(10/13) 



(9/14) 



(10/8) 



CELSO A. RUPERTO, Appellant 
) vs. 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



LAWRENCE LO, Appellant 
) vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



TDenial on July 28, 1986, 
[of permit to Alter a Building 
[at 114-116 Clarendon Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8513565 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 

APPEAL NO. 86-226 

TDenial on August 28, 1986, 
[of permit to Alter a Building 
[at 828 Bay Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8409412. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY 

APPEAL NO. 86-188 

"TOrder to Cease Violation of 
[the Planning Code, dated July 9, 
[1986, for property at 1340 Bryant 
[Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/26) 

APPEAL NO. 86-192 

fOrder to Cease Violation of the 
[Planning Code, dated July 11, 1986, 
[for property at 164 Turk Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/26) 

APPEAL NO. V86-169 

"TDenial on June 12, 1986, 
[Rear Yard Variance sought for 






[property at 464| Filbert Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/2) 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

ROBERT J. MCCARTHY VICE PRESIDENT 

MATTIE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing . 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Hailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
558-4421 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 



Robert H Feldman City and County of San Francisco 

Executive Director BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 558-4421 Room 154-A, City Hall 

San Francisco, California 94102 



&CARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

CITY HALL 
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 




Public Library 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 1986 
/ 5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 



.VIE NTS de; 

I -6 

H'tUIJC LIBRAPV 



APPEAL NO. 86-176 



APPEAL NO. 86-236 



APPEAL NO. 86-228 



APPEAL NO. 86-232 



ALDO R. LUCCHESI, JR., AND ANN B. 
RAMSEY, Appellants 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 

RAYMOND KONG, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
DAHI DISAPPROVAL 



FEDERAL SIGN, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



FEDERAL SIGN, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



FEDERAL SIGN, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



SCOTT LAMSON. Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



E. TERI ALLEN, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Appellant 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO 
CHEMICAL AWARENESS TREATMENT SERVICTj 



APPEAL NO. 86-233 



APPEAL NO. 86-238 



APPEAL NO. 86-234 



86-23 



Appellant 



vs. 



ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 86-23 



SAN FRANCISCANS FOR REASONABLE GROWTH7 

Appellant 
vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



Denial on June 23, 1986, of 
permit to Alter a Building at 
3133-37 Broderick Street. 
APPLICATION NO. 8607250. 
FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 

Denial on September 7, 1986, of 
permit to Alter a Building at 
11 Bel den Place. 
APPLICATION NO. 8606030. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. 

Denial on August 26, 1986, of 
permit to Erect a Sign at 
1300 Post Street. 
APPLICATION NO. 8608290. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(8/11) 



(10/18) 



(10/9) 



Denial on August 26, 1986, of 
permit to Erect a Sign at 
1300 Post Street. 
APPLICATION NO. 8608292. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(10/13) 



"Denial on August 26, 1986, of 
permit to Erect a Sign at 
1300 Post Street. 
APPLICATION NO. 8608293. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(10/13) 



Denial on August 27, 1986, of 
permit to Alter a Building at 
600 Van Ness Avenue. 
APPLICATION NO. 8509958. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(10/20) 



Protesting issuance on 
August 20, 1986, of permit 
to Alter a Building 
at 1882 Green Street. 
APPLICATION NO. 8603392. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(10/14) 



"Determination on August 29, 1986, 

by the Zoning Administrator that 

a Non-Conforming Use has Terminated 

at 435 Duboce Street. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (10/18) 



"Protesting Determination on 

August 20, 1986, that the Pacific III 

Project is Under Construction Within 

the Meaning Section 175.1 and Related 

Zoning Bulletin dated February 21, 

1986. 

APPLICATION NO. 7910880. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/3) 



ELECTION OF VICE PRESIDENT FOR REMAINDER OF TERM 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEAI S 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

MATTIE J, JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing . 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner Is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing * j 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
558-4421 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING 
Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a decision 
and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and 
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be made by the Board 
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a 
written request stating succinctly the grounds upon which such rehearing is requested, 
(b) If new evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show: 
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a 
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at 
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the 
previous hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations for 
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the 
Board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is 
considered by the Board. \ 



Robert H. Feldman City and County of San Francisco 

Executive Director BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 558-4421 Room 154-A, City Hall 

San Francisco, California 94102 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

CITY HALL 
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94TO2 




^C^^z^^^> 



Pub "c Library 






F 

z 

1(k 



Xa* 



-6F 



CETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 
WEDNESDAY; OCTOBER 15, 1986 
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 



DOCUMENTS DEBT. 

OCT 151986 

SAN FRANCISCO 
PuauC LIBRARY 



\TTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 



APPEAL NO. 86-245 



3REN A. DRAZNIN, Appellant 

vs. 
3LICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



APPEAL NO 
BTING CHEEDLET AND ROOSEVELT TARLESSON, 
E "R.D. TARLESSON TELEVISION," Appellants 

vs. 
DLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



"[Denial on September 11, 1986, of 
[Driver Public Vehicle permit at 
[1200 Minnesota Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (10/28) 



86-246 



T Denial on September 11, 1986, of 
[Second Hand Dealer-State Permit 
[at 639A Divisadero Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (10/28) 



APPEAL NO. 86-210 



lYAS ABSAR, Appellant 

vs. 
EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
ITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



ENNIS RIGG, Appellant 

vs. 
EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



T Denial on July 28, 1986, of 
[permit to Alter a Building at 
[114-116 Clarendon Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8513565. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 



(9/14) 



APPEAL NO. 86-243 



TDenial on September 15, 1986, 
[of permit to Alter a Building at 
[1917-1919 Ellis Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8610902. 



[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(10/25) 



APPEAL NO. 86-257 



MMIT KENNEDY, Appellant 

vs. 
EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
ITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



COTT LAMSON, Appellant 

vs. 
EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
ITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



IRS CORPORATION, Appellant 

vs. 
IEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
:ITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



)RS CORPORATION, Appellant 

vs. 
)EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
:iTY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



TDenial on September 29, 1986, 

[of permit to Alter a Building at 

[5174 3rd Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8604719. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/9) 



APPEAL NO. 86-238 



TDenial on August 27, 1986, of 
[permit to Alter a Building at 
[600 Van Ness Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8509958. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(10/20) 



APPEAL NO. 86-249 



TDenial on September 21, 1986, 
[of permit to Erect a Sign at 
[3184 Mission Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8609883. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(11/1) 



APPEAL NO. 86-250 



TDenial on September 21, 1986, 
[of permit to Erect a Sign at 
[5454 Mission Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8609886. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(11/1) 



APPEAL NO. 86-248 



1730 BRODERICK CORPORATION, Appellant 

vs . 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 

[September 10, 1986, to Leone H. Kuhn, 

[permit to Alter a Building at 

[1734 Broderick Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8609255. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/1) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, OCTOBER 15, 1986 PAGE TWO 



APPEAL NO. V86-241 
HELEN GLEASON, Appellant TDenial on September 3, 1986, of 

vs. [Front Setback Variance sought 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [for property at 1876 15th Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (10/22) 

APPEAL NO. V86-242 
RALPH SKINNER, Appellant f Denial on September 3, 1986, of 

vs. [Off-Street Parking and Rear Yard 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [Variance sought for property 

[located at 2935-2937 Fillmore Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (10/25) 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

MATT IE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing . 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
558-4421 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING 
Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a decision 
and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and 
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be made by the Board 
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a 
written request stating succinctly the grounds upon which such rehearing is requested, 
(b) If new evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show: 
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a 
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at 
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the 
previous hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations for 
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the 
Board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is 
considered by the Board. 



Robert H. Feldman 
Executive Director 
(415) 558-4421 



City and County of San Francisco 

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

Room 154-A, City Hall 

San Francisco, California 94102 



m**au of pmmr appeals 

CITY HALL 
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94*0* 




?7Z£7cJ%7 



(TO<^ 



Public Library 



QflydjL, 






MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 29, 1986 

5:00 P.M., Room 282, CITY HALL 



l»QCUMEftTS DtPT. 

007 3 1986 

SAN FRANCISCO 
PHRIJC LIBRAPV 



MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 

APPEAL NO. 86- 235 

JORGE DEL RIO, dba "EL TORO BAR 
AND GRILL," Appellant 

vs . 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



APPEAL NO, 86-234 



E. TERI ALLEN, Appellant 

vs . 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 86-25 



EMMIT KENNEDY, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 86-240 



M & T PROPERTIES, INC., Appellant 

vs. — 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 86-223 



WILLIAM POWERS, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
DAHI DISAPPROVAL 



DONALD WASSERMAN, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
DAHI DISAPPROVAL 



BERNARD SCHWEIGERT, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
DAHI DISAPPROVAL 



D. p. SAMANT, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
DAHI DISAPPROVAL 



PIERO BOSCACCI, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
DAHI DISAPPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 86-22 



APPEAL NO. 86-230 



APPEAL NO. 86-239 



APPEAL NO. 86-20 



Denial on August 27, 1986, 

of Dance Hall Keeper and 

Place of Entertainment 

permits at 2470 San Bruno 

Avenue. 

FOR HEARING OCTOBER 29, 1986. 



(10/15) 



Protesting issuance on 

August 20, 1986, to Ted 

Aksnes, permit to alter 

a building at 1882 Green 

Street. 

APPLICATION NO. 8603392. 

FOR REHEARING OCTOBER 29, 1986. (10/14) 



Denial on September 29, 1986, 
of permit to alter a Building 
at 5174 3rd Street. 
APPLICATION NO. 8604719. 
FOR HEARING OCTOBER 29, 1986. 



(11/9) 



Denial on September 12, 1986, 
of permit to alter a building 
at 369 Pine Street. 
APPLICATION NO. 8609853. 
FOR HEARING OCTOBER 29, 1986. 



(10/22) 



Denial on August 22, 1986, of 
permit to alter a building at 
2375 - 2377 Francisco Street. 
APPLICATION NO. 8606123. 
FOR HEARING OCTOBER 29, 1986. 



(10/7) 



Denial on August 28, 1986, of 
permit to alter a building at 
2736 - 2758 Franklin Street. 
APPLICATION NO. 8609793. 
FOR HEARING OCTOBER 29, 1986. 



(10/7) 



Denial on September 2, 1986, 
of permit to alter a building 
at 743-C Oak Streeto 
APPLICATION NO. 8609816. 
FOR HEARING OCTOBER 29, 1986. 



(10/12) 



Denial on September 5, 1986, 
of permit to alter a building 
at 445 Bush Street. 
APPLICATION N0 o 8609667. 
FOR HEARING OCTOBER 29, 1986c 



(10/20) 



Denial on August 4, 1986, of 
permit to alter a building 
at 1520-22A Lombard Street. 
APPLICATION NO. 8606023. 
FOR HEARING OCTOBER 29, 1986. 



(10/13) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF .PERMIT APPEALS, OCTOBER 29, 1986 PAGE TWO 



APPEAL NO. 86-228 
FEDERAL SIGN, Appellant [Denial on August 26, 1986, 

A) vs. [of permit to erect a Sign 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [at 1300 Post Street. 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8608290. 

[FOR HEARING OCTOBER 29, 1986. (10/9) 

APPEAL NO. 86-232 
FEDERAL SIGN, Appellant ["Denial on August 26, 1986, 

B) vs. [of permit to erect a Sign 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [at 1300 Post Street. 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8608292. 

[FOR HEARING OCTOBER 29, 1986. (10/13) 

APPEAL NO. 86-233 
FEDERAL SIGN, Appellant [Denial on August 26, 1986, 

C) vs. [of permit to erect a Sign 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [at 1300 Post Street. 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8608293. 

[FOR HEARING OCTOBER 29, 1986. (10/13) 

APPEAL NO. 86-244 
GANNETT OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, Appellant [Order to Cease Violation of 
) vs. [the Planning Code dated 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [September 5, 1986, for 

[property at 670 - 8th Street. 
__ [FOR HEARING OCTOBER 29, 1986. (10/25) 

APPEAL NO. 86-264 
WANDA CASTRO, Appellant [Protesting issuance on 

) vs. [September 29, 1986, to John T. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [and Lois E. Williams permit to 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [alter a building at 1529 Beach 

[Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8608195. 
[FOR HEARING OCTOBER 29, 1986. (11/15) 

APPEAL NO. 86-231 
SAN FRANCISCANS FOR REASONABLE GROWTH, fProtesting Determination on 

Appellant [August 20, 1986, that the 

) vs. [Pacific III Project is Under 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [Construction Within the Meaning 

[Section 175.1 and Related Zoning 
[Bulletin dated February 21, 1986. 
[APPLICATION NO. 7910880. 
[FOR HEARING OCTOBER 29, 1986. (11/3) 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN VICE PRESIDENT 

MATTIE J, JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

JOSE E. MEDINA COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing . 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
558-4421 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING 
Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a decision 
and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and 
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be made by the Board 
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a 
written request stating succinctly the grounds upon which such rehearing is requested, 
(b) If new evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show: 
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a 
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at 
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the 
previous hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations for 
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the 
Board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is 
considered by the Board. 



Robert H Feldman Cit ^ and Count y of San Francisco 

Executive Director B0ARD 0F PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 554-6720 Roorn 154 " A > Cit y Hal1 

San Francisco, California 94102 



SOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

CITY HALL 
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94 WS 




Public Library 



l 

/si* 



jLm* 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF- PERMIT APPEALS 
WEDNESDAY; NOVEMBER 5, 1986 
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 



DOCUMENTS Dl.PT, 
NOV 4 1986 



PURUCt I IBRAPV 

) MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 



JORGE DEL RIO, dba "EL TORO BAR AND 
GRILL," Appellant 

vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 86-235 

fDenial on August 27, 1986, 



[of Dance Hall Keeper and Place 
[of Entertainment permits at 
[2470 San Bruno Avenue. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 



(10/15) 



QRS CORPORATION, Appellant 
\) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



QRS CORPORATION, Appellant 
5) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



H.O.T. POPCORN, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC HEALTH, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



STANLEY ROTH, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC HEALTH, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



NESS A. AQUINO, Appellant 

vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



EFFIE SHARABIE, Appellant 

vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 86-249 

"[Denial on September 21, 1986, 
[of permit to Erect a Sign at 
[3184 Mission Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8609883 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 

APPEAL NO. 86-250 

"TDenial on September 21, 1986, 
[of permit to Erect a Sign at 
[5454 Mission Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8609886. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 



(11/1) 



(11/1) 



APPEAL NO. 86-263 

~" ["Revocation on September 25, 1986, 
[of permit to operate H.O.T. Popcorn 
[at 250 Beach Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/12) 

APPEAL NO. 86-266 

"[Revocation on September 26, 1986, 
[of permit for Pretzel Pushcart at 
[250 Beach Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/15) 

APPEAL NO. 86-268 

"[Revocation on October 6, 1986, 



[of Dance Hall Keeper permit 
[at 443 Broadway. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY 



(11/17) 



APPEAL NO. 86-271 



REX A. CAPONI, RIGAN CAPONI, MICHAEL 
MONAHAN, Appellant 

vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



"["Revocation on October 6, 1986, of 
[permit to Operate a Limousine. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/17) 

APPE AL NO. 86-272 

^Revocation on October 6, 1986, of 



[Billiard Parlor permit at 
[1315-9th Avenue. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(11/18) 



CHAISIT CHOBPANICH, Appellant 
) vs. 

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 

DARRYL F. RUCKER, Appellant 
0) vs. 

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



GARY RAUGH ENTERPRISES, Appellant 
M) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 86-273 

["Revocation on October 6, 1986, of 

[Jitney Bus Operator permit. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/18) 

APPEAL NO. 86-274 

~~ [Revocation on October 3, 1986, 
[of Outcall Massage Service 
[permit at 155 Duboce Street. 
[FOR HEARING NOVEMBER 5, 1986. (11/18) 



APPEAL NO. 86-261 



TDenial on October 1, 1986, of 
[permit to Alter a Building at 2136 
[Broderick Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8610450. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/12) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, NOVEMBER 



5, 



1986. 



PAGE TWO 



APPEAL NO. 86-262 



GARY RAUGH ENTERPRISES, Appellant 
) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



ALEX CHERKAS, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



MARY PANOVICH, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



"["Denial on October 1, 1986, of permit 
[to Alter a Building at 2148 Broderick 
[Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8610451. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/12) 



APPEAL NO. 86-277 



HENRY M. AND MARY DOWKE, Appellant 



vs 



DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



"[Denial on October 3, 1986, of permit 
[to Erect a Structure at 1487 -48th 
[Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8608324. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/19) 

APPEAL NO. 86-260 

~~ ["Protesting issuance September 26, 1986, 
[to Michael Slade, permit to 
[alter a building at 579 Kansas 
[Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8607764. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/11) 

APPEAL NO. 86-267 

"protesting issuance on September 20, 
[1986, to Scott J. and Sandra M. 
[Nakamura, permit to Alter a 
[Building at 2055-47th Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8608696. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(11/16) 



APPEAL NO. 86-269 



ANTONINA BOLSHAKOVA, Appellant 
) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



"["Protesting issuance on October 1, 

[1986, to Shing Kit and Julie Lee, 

[permit to demolish a building at 

[1639-1 Oth Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8608949. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/17) 



APPEAL NO. 86-270 



ANTONINA BOLSHAKOVA, Appellant 
) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



"[Protesting issuance on October 8, 

[1986, to Shing Kit and Julie Lee, 

[permit to Erect a Structure at 

[1639-lOth Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8608948. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/17) 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN VICE PRESIDENT 

MATTIE J, JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

JOSE E. MEDINA COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing . 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to e 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
558-4421 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING 
Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a decision 
and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and 
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be made by the Board 
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a 
written request stating succinctly the grounds upon which such rehearing is requested, 
(b) If new evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show: 
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a 
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at 
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the 
previous hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations for 
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the 
Board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is 
considered by the Board. 



Robert H. Feldman 
Executive Director 
(415) 554-6720 



City and County of San Francisco 

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

Room 154-A, City Hall 

San Francisco, California 94102 



BOARD OF- T APPEALS 

CITY HALL 
SAN FRANCISCO, CA S4T02 




'&CU, 



- *Cffl-k-IDRARIAN 
Public Library 



l^V\ ^lA^^MDAj 










MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBEFf 12, I986 ~ 
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282? CITY HALL 



DUCUSvlE 

NOV 12 1986 

SAN FKAlMCil^O 
PUBLIC LIBRAKV 



MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 

APPEAL NO. 86-22: 



JOHN E. BARBEY, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



WANDA CASTRO, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



SCOTT A MCKELLAR, Appellant 

vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



JOHN BOYLE, Appellant 

vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



PHILIP A. GUNNING AND 

SIDNEY J. GABRIEL, Appellants 

vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 86-264 



APPEAL NO. 86-280 



APPEAL NO. 86-28 



APPEAL NO. 86-284 



APPEAL NO. 86-286 



DENISE A. LAMB, Appellant 

vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 

APPEAL NO 
PHAT TRUONG, dba "H & P AUTO REPAIR'S 
TOWING," Appellant 

vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



86-288 



APPEAL NO. 86-238 



SCOTT LAMSON, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



DANA DEVOTO HEMBERGER, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



P. THEODORE ANDERSON, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



P. THEODORE ANDERSON, Appellant 
) vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 86-256 



APPEAL NO. 86-275 



APPEAL NO. 86-258 



Denial on August 22, 1986, of permit 

to Alter a Building at 50 Liberty 

Street . 

APPLICATION NO. 8609377. 

FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (10/1) 



Protesting issuance on September 29, 

1986, to John T. and Lois E. Williams, 

permit to Alter a Building at 1529 

Beach Street. 

APPLICATION NO. 8608195. 

FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (11/15) 



Revocation on October 6, 1986, of 
Driver Public Passenger Vehicle 
permit, (annual fee) 
FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/24) 



Revocation on October 6, 1986, of 
Driver Public Passenger Vehicle 
permit, (annual fee) 
FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/24) 



Revocation on October 6, 1986, of 
Place of Entertainment permit at 
3565-67 Geary Boulevard, (annual fee) 
FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/25) 



Suspension on October 6, 1986, of 
Driver Public Vehicle permit. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(11/25) 



Denial on October 9, 1986, of 
Tow Car Operator permit at 
943 Harrison Street. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. 

Denial on August 27, 1986, of 
permit to Alter a Building at 
600 Van Ness Avenue. 
APPLICATION NO. 8509958. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(11/29) 



(10/20) 



Protesting issuance on September 17, 

1986, to Lance Myers, permit to 

Alter a Building at 69 Uranus 

Terrace. 

APPLICATION NO. 8605570. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/8) 



Protesting issuance on October 3, 

1986, to Derg Construction, permit 

to Erect a Building at 417 Quintara 

Street . 

APPLICATION NO. 8606506. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/19) 



Protesting issuance on September 23, 

1986, to Li am Cafferkey, permit to 

Erect a Structure at 411 Quintara 

Street . 

APPLICATION NO. 8606507. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/11) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, 

APPEAL NO. 86- 
JOHN H. PFLUKE, Appellant 



vs 



APPEAL NO. 86-27 



APPEAL NO. 86-283 



APPEAL NO. 86-303 



DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



MELVIN WILLIAMS, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



JEANNE ZIMMERMAN, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



DAVID COLLINS, Appellant 
) vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



DAVID COLLINS, Appellant 
) vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO 
SAN FRANCISCANS FOR REASONABLE GROWTH"; 
ASIAN LAW CAUCUS, COCHO, NOMPC, AND 
AFFORDABLE HOUSING ALLIANCE, Appellant 
) vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



NOVEMBER 12, 1986 PAGE TWO 

259 

Protesting issuance on September 24 

1986, to H & E Development, permit 

to Erect a Structure at 2865 Clay 



APPEAL NO. 86-304 



86-312 



APPEAL NO. V86-282 



THOMAS PORTUE, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



BARBARA FASKEN, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



JAY MASTER CORPORATION, Appellan 
>) vs. 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. V86-285 



APPEAL NO. 86-28 



APPEAL NO. 86-126 



RONN RIDGLE, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 
HEALTH DEPARTMENT APPROVAL 



to 
Erect 
Street. 
APPLICATION 
FOR HEARING 



NO. 8601987 
TODAY. 



(11/11) 



Protesting issuance on October 3, 
1986, to Robert A. Imhoff, permit 
to Alter a Building at 250 Taylor 
Street. 



APPLICATION NO. 8605029. 



(11/18) 



Protesting issuance on October 6, 

1986, to 757 North Point Partnership, 

permit to Erect a Structure at 757 

North Point Street. 

APPLICATION NO. 8605254. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. )ll/25) 



Protesting issuance on October 27, 

1986, to Van Ness Associates, permit 

to Demolish a Building at 1668 Mission 

Street . 

APPLICATION NO. 8609842. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/8) 



Protesting issuance on October 29, 

1986, to Deringer Development Group, 

permit to Erect a Structure at 1660 

Mission Street. 

APPLICATION NO. 8500451. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/8) 



Protesting issuance on October 27, 

1986, to Van Ness Associates II, 

permit to Demolish a Building at 

1668 Mission Street. 

APPLICATION NO. 8509842. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/16) 



Protesting Condition of Variance on 
October 8, 1986, for property 
located at 934-938 Potrero Avenue. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/17) 



1986, 



Protesting issuance on October 7, 
of Rear Yard Variance sought for 
property located at 1150 Sacramento 
Street . 
FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/16) 



Determination of the Zoning 
Administrator dated October 8, 1986, 
Rescinding Approval of Parking 
Variance 85.673V issued April 10, 1986, 
for the property at 1098 Harrison. 
Street, (proposed Epic Dance Club). 
FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/26) 

"Protesting issuance on May 5, 
1986, to Jay and Juthika Master, 
permit to Alter a Building at 
1098 Harrison Street. 
APPLICATION NO. 8506385. 



FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(6/23) 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E, BERG PRESIDENT 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN VICE PRESIDENT 

MATT IE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

JOSE E. MEDINA COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing . 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
558-4421 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING 
Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a decision 
and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and 
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be made by the Board 
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a 
written request stating succinctly the grounds upon which such rehearing is requested, 
(b) If new evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show: 
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a 
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at 
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the 
previous hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations for 
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the 
Board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is 
considered by the Board. 



Robert H Feldman Cit y and Count y of San Francisco 

Executive Director B0ARD 0F PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 554-6720 Room 154_A > Cit y Hal1 

San Francisco, California 94102 



tfOAttD OF PEHF/rt r APPfcAU 

CITY HALL 
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94T02 



CITY LIBRARIAN 
Public Library 






/ 



& F H ^[ AGENDO 



bt 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OFJ>ERMIT APPEALS 

WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER^ 19, 1986 

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282,J:iTY HALL 



DOCUMENTS DEPT. 

NOV 181985 

SAINI FRANCJiioO 
PUBLIC LIBRARY 



MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 



* APPEAL NO. 86-283 



JEANNE ZIMMERMAN, Appellant 

vs . 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPPEAL NO 



EMMIT KENNEDY, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 

APPEAL NO. 
MIKE T. BANDUCCI, dba "B AND A TOWTW 1 



"["Protesting issuance on October 6, 

[1986, to 757 North Point Partnership, 

[permit to Erect a Structure at 757 

[North Point Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8605254. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (11/25) 

86-257 

[Denial on September 29, 1986, 
[of permit to Alter a Building 
[at 5174 3rd Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8604719. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 



(11/9) 



86-214 

["Denial 



Appellant, 



vs. 



on July 28, 1986, of Tow Car 
[Operator permit at 1560 Folsom Street. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (9/17) 



POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 

HUNG LE, Appellant 

vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



FEDERAL SIGN, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



FEDERAL SIGN, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



FEDERAL SIGN, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



ABDUL FATAH SHAHIEN, Appellant 

vs. 
HEALTH DEPT., Respondent 



MARK RENNIE dba "BILLBOARD CAFE," 

Appellant 
vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



JOHN W. COSTELLO, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 86-216 

["Denial on July 22, 1986, of 

[Massage Establishment permit 

[at 931 Kearny Street. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (9/21) 

APPEAL NO. 86-228 

fDenial on August 26, 1986, 

[of permit to Erect a Sign at 

[1300 Post Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8608290. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (10/9) 

APPEAL NO. 86-232 

[Denial on August 26, 1986, 

[of permit to Erect a Sign at 

[1300 Post Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8608292. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (10.13) 

APPEAL NO. 86-233 

TDenial on August 26, 1986, 

[of permit to Erect a Sign at 

[1300 Post Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8608293. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (10/13) 



APPEAL NO 



86-254 

TDenial on September 18, 1986, of 
[permit to Operate a Restaurant at 
[1402 Grant Avenue. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/8) 



APPEAL NO. 86-251 



APPEAL NO 



^Imposition of Penalty on 
[September 17, 1986, for work done 
[at 299-9th Street. (Electrical ) 
[APPLICATION' MO. 005524. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/5) 

86-292 

["Appealing refund of penalty 

[imposed on October 24, 1986, 

[for work done at 2037 Pierce 

[Street . 

[APPLICATION NO. 8603959. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/3) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, NOVEMBER 19, 1986 



PAGE TWO 



HOFFMAN'S CAFE AND GRILL, INC., 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 86 -278 
Appellant 



[/Protesting issuance on October 3, 

[1986, to Lincoln-Hunt Development 

[Company, permit to Alter a Building 

[at 619 Market Street. (33 New Montgomery) 

[APPLICATION NO. 8608180. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/24) 



APPEAL NO. 86-289 



GOLDEN GATE HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD, ASSOC 
Appellant 
vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO 



SONIA WONG, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



GLEN K. TADAKUMA, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



TWIN PEAKS COUNCIL, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



ELBA POGGI, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



DAVID COLLINS, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



"[Protesting issuance on October 16, 
[1986, to Frank Reilly, permit to 
[Erect a Structure at 870 Noriega 
[Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8603902. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/3) 

86-290 

[Protesting issuance on October 17, 
[1986, to Edmond Mirabito, permit to 
[demolish a building at 226 Balboa 



[Street 
[APPLICATION 
[FOR HEARING 



NO. 8602466. 
TODAY. 



(12/4) 



APPEAL NO. 86-291 

[Protesting issuance 



on October 16, 
[1986, to Guinnane Construction Co., 
[Inc., permit to Demolish a Building 
[at 330-27th Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8612224. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/3) 



APPEAL NO. 86-295 



[Protesting issuance on October 17, 

[1986, of permit to Occupy a Street 

[Space at 123 Raccoon Drive. 

[PERMIT NO. 556048. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/4) 



SAN FRANCISCANS FOR REASONABLE GROWTRT 

Appellant 
vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 86-296 

[Protesting issuance on October 20, 

[1986, to Anthony W. Braun, permit 

[to Alter a Building at 4032 Ulloa 

[Street . 

[APPLICATION NO. 8601224. 

[FOR HEARING -TODAY. (12/6) 

APPEAL NO. 86-304 

"[Protesting issuance on October 29, 
[1986, to Deringer Development Group, 
[permit to Erect a Structure at 1660 
[Mission Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8500451S. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/8) 

APPEAL NO. 86-320 

["Protesting issuance on October 29, 

[1986, to Deringer Development Group, 

[permit to Erect a Structure at 

[1660 Mission Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8500451S. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/20) 



SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD 



APPEAL NO 



JEANNE ZIMMERMAN, Appellant 
10. 2) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



86-283 

["Protesting issuance on October 6, 

[1986, to 757 North Point Partnership, 

[permit to Erect a Structure at 757 

[North Point Street. 

[SITE INSPECTION WEDNESDAY, 

[NOVEMBER 19, 1986, AT 8:30 A.M. (11/25) 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN VICE PRESIDENT 

MATTIE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

JOSE E. MEDINA COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing . 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
558-4421 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING 
Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a decision 
and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and 
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be made by the Board 
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a 
written request stating succinctly the grounds upon which such rehearing is requested, 
(b) If new evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show: 
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a 
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at 
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the 
previous hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations for 
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the 
Board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is 
considered by the Board. 



Rohprt h F*iHm a n City and County of San Francisco 

Executive DirX BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 554-6720 Room 154 " A > Clt y Hal1 

San Francisco, California 94102 



GOARD OF PERMtT APPEALS 

CITY HALL 
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94*8% 





VGet?t& 



Public Library 





I 

fst, 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF TERM IT APPEALS 
Q, WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 5, 1986 






5;00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 



• 



MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 



APPEAL NO. 86-296 



ELBA POGGI, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 
[October 20, 1986, to 
[Anthony W. Braun, permit to 
[Alter a Building at 
[4032 Ulloa Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8601224. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 



(12/6) 



APPEAL NO. 86-249 



QRS CORPORATION, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



QRS CORPORATION, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



TDenial on September 21, 1986, 
[of permit to Erect a Sign at 
[3184 Mission Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8609883. 
[FOR FURHTER HEARING TODAY. 



(11/1) 



APPEAL NO 



86-250 

["Denial 



on September 21, 1986, 
[of permit to Erect a Sign at 
[5454 Mission Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8609886. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 



(11/1) 



APPEAL NO. 86-301 



NEIGHBORHOOD PALS OF OAKLAND, INC., 

Appellant 
vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 

APPEAL NO 
RAJA KHAN, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



[Revocation on October 21, 1986, 
[of Charitable Organization 
[Certificate at 936 Geary Blvd. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/7) 

86-300 

[Appealing for refund of penalty 
[imposed on October 28, 1986, for 
[work done at 611 Folsom. 



[APPLICATION NO. 8611657. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(12/8) 



APPEAL NO, 



PETER ROCHE, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC HEALTH, Respondent 



APPEAL NO 



PIERO BOSCACCI, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
DAHI DISAPPROVAL 



WILLIAM POWERS, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
DAHI DISAPPROVAL 



BERNARD SCHWEIGERT, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
DAHI DISAPPROVAL 



D. P. SAMANT, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
DAHI DISAPPROVAL 



86-309 

["Protesting issuance on October 30, 

[1986, to Patricia and Mahmoud 

[Larizedeh, Coffee Bean Take-Out and 

[Coffee Bean Roasting permit, at 

[415 Castro Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/16) 

86-207 

[Denial on August 4, 1986, of 



[permit to Alter a Building at 
[1520-22A Lombard Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8606023. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 

APPEAL NO. 86-223 

TDenial on August 22, 1986, of 
[permit to Alter a Building at 
[2375-2377 Franicsco Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8606123. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 

APPEAL NO. 86-230 

"TDenial on September 2, 1986, of 
[permit to Alter a Building at 
[743-C Oak Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8609816. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(10/13) 



(10/7) 



(10/12) 



APPEAL NO 



86-239 

["Denial on September 5, 1986, of 
[permit to Alter a Building at 
[445 Bush Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8609667. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 



(10/20) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, DECEMBER 3, 1986 



PAGE TWO 



APPEAL NO. 86-265 



JAMES A. LUCEY, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



THOMAS E. MCCORMICK, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



GREG HOLZMAN, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



JEAN DEL CARLO, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



ARTHUR ADAMS, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



"[TJenial on September 24, 1986, of 

[permit to Alter a Building at 

[17-19 Chattanooga Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8308769. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/15) 



APPEAL NO. 86-293 

[Denial of October 16, 1986, of 
[permit to Erect a Structure 
[at 2675-25th Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8512994. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 

APPEAL NO. 86-298 

[Denial on October 22, 1986, of 
[permit to Alter a Building at 
[1701 Van Ness Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8613002. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 

APPEAL NO. V86-299 

[Denial on October 15, 1986, of 
[Rear Yard Variance sought for 
[property located at 
[510-512 Sanchez Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 

APPEAL NO. V86-302 

DerTial on October 21, 1986, of 
[Front Setback Variance sought 
[for property located at 
[2014-1 9th Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(12/3) 



(12/6) 



(12/6) 



(12/7) 



APPEAL NO 



TERMINAL PLAZA CORPORATION, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO 
SAN FRANCISCANS FOR REASONABLE GROWTH! 

Appellant 
vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



86-305 

[Protesting issuance on October 20, 
[1986, to Five Fremont Center 
[Associates, permit to Alter a 
[Building at 50 Fremont Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8609139. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/9) 

86-30^ 

[Protesting issuance on October 20, 

[1986, to Five Fremont Center Associates, 

[permit to Alter a Structure at 

[50 Fremont Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8609139. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/9) 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN VICE PRESIDENT 

MATTIE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

JOSE E. MEDINA COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing . 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
558-4421 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING 
Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a decision 
and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and 
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be made by the Board 
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a 
written request stating succinctly the grounds upon which such rehearing is requested, 
(b) If new evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show: 
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a 
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at 
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the 
previous hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations for 
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the 
Board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is 
considered by the Board. 



Robert H. Feldman Cit ^ and County of San Francisco 

Executive Director B0ARD 0F PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 554-6720 Room 154 " A > Clt y Hal1 

San Francisco, California 94102 



nvmvua n Ai re 




8Hfr6 VD 'OOSIONVa J tm 
11VH A1I0 

si¥3ddv ifiAiaad do awvfl 



•7\ 



)DR 






V 



/ 

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER. 10, 1986 

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282/- CITY HALL 

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 



ILYAS ABSAR, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



DENISE A LAMB, Appellant 

vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 86-210 



TDenial on July 28, 1986, of 
[permit ot Alter a Building 
[at 114-116 Clarendon Avenue 
[APPLICATION NO. 8513565. 
[FOR REHEARING TODAY. 



APPEAL NO. 86-286 



(9/14) 



"[Suspension on October 6, 1986, 
[of Driver Public Vehicle 
[permit. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(11/25) 



YUNG S. LEE, dba "SUKY'S SPA," 
Appellant 
vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



ALEXANDER BERESNEV, Appellant 

vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



APPEAL NO 



86-310 

"[Denial on 



October 14, 1986, 
[of Massage Establishment permit 
[at 136 Mason Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(12/16) 



APPEAL NO 



86-317 

— [Revocation on October 31, 1986, 
[of Driver Public Vehicle permit. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/17) 



APPEAL NO. 86-319 



KENNETH M. WOON, Appellant^^^s DEPT . 



vs 



DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent^ &c y 1935 



SAiJ FRANCISCO 
PUBLIC UBPA° V 



"[^Appealing for refund of penalty 

[imposed on November 10, 1986, 

[for work done at 1201 Pacific 

[Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8611884. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(12/20) 



STANLEY CHAN, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



LEONARD LEVY, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 86-323 

"["Imposition of penalty for work 
[done at 2490-1 8th Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8606273 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(12/23) 



APPEAL NO 



86-308 

[Protesting issuance on 
[October 28, 1986, to William 
[and Carol ee Scoortis, permit to 
[Alter a Building at 3880 Clay 



[Street. 
[APPLICATION; 
[FOR HEARIHC 



NO. 8606201 
TODAY. 



(12/7) 



APPEAL NO 



BETTY RADER, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



86-307 

"fProtesting issuance on 

[October 28, 1986, to Alfred 

[Wastlhuber, permit to Erect 

[a Structure at 19 Alta Street 

[APPLICATION NO. 8606037. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(12/7) 



APPEAL NO 



ROBERT RANSOM, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



86-313 

[Protesting issuance on October 28, 
[1986, to Alfred Wastlhuber, permit 
[to Erect a Structure at 19 Alta 



[Street. 
[APPLICATION 
[FOR HEARING 



NO. 8606037 
TODAY. 



(12/16) 



APPEAL NO, 



TELEGRAPH HILL DWELLERS, Appellant" 

vs . 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



86-316 

"[Protesting issuance on October 28, 
[1986, to Alfred L. Wastlhuber, 
[permit to Erect a Structure at 
[19 Alta Street. 

TAPPI TTATTnN NO £606037 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS HEARING OF DECEMBER 10, 1986 PAGE TWO 

APPEAL NO. 86-279 
MELVIN WILLIAMS, Appellant ["Protesting issuance on October 3, 

vs. [1986, to Robert A. Imhoff, permit 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [to Alter a Building at 250 Taylor 

[Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8605029. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/18) 

APPEAL NO. 86-315 
FLOYD ROTH AND NANCY WILSON, AppelTant ["Protesting issuance on October 28, 

vs. [1986, to Artman Construction. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [permit to Erect a Structure at 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [2016 Pacific Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8607717S 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/17) 

APPEAL NO. 86-318 
DAGGETT H. HOWARD, JR., Appellant ["Protesting issuance on October 29, 

vs. [1986, to Robert H. Strand, permit 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [to Alter a Building at 2911 Pine 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8603465. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/17) 

APPEALS NO. 86-332 THRU 86-341 
NEIGHBORS AND RESIDENTS OF THE DUBOCE TRIANGE, [Protesting issuance on November 14, 

Appellants [1986, to Donald MacDonald, permits 
vs. [to Erect Structures at 2,4,6,8,10, 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [and 12 Steiner Street. 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [APPLICATION NOS. 8513701-8513705 r 

[and 490, 492, 494 and 496 DUBOCE. 
[APPLICATION NOS. 8513697-8513700. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/3/87) 

APPEAL NO. V86-311 
AHMAD MOHAZAB, Appellant [Denial on October 30, 1986 of 

vs. [Rear Yard Variance sought for 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [property located at 2074 

[Jackson Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/16) 

APPEAL NO. 86-126 

RONN RIDGLE, Appellant ["Protesting issuance on May 5, 1986, 

vs. [to Jay and Juthika Master, permit 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [to Alter a Building at 1098 Harrison 

FIRE DEPT. APPROVAL [Street. 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8606385. 

HEALTH DEPT. APPROVAL [FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/23) 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN VICE PRESIDENT 

MATTIE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

JOSE E. MEDINA COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing . 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
558-4421 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING 
Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a decision 
and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and 
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be made by the Board 
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a 
written request stating succinctly the grounds upon which such rehearing is requested, 
(b) If new evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show: 
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a 
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at 
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the 
previous hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations for 
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the 
Board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is 
considered by the Board. 



Robert H. Feldman Cit ^ and County of San Franc1SC0 

Executive Director B0ARD 0F PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 554-6720 - Room 154_A > Cit y Hdl1 

San Francisco, California 94102 



SUAttDOF T APPEALS 

CITY HALL 
SAN T C A 94102 




<nZ66??<u^z 



Public Library 



sj^ 



) V DOCL 

MEETING OF THE BOARD JOF PERMIT APPEALS 

^ n r r 1 v i°pr 

m[y WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 17, 1986 

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282/ tITY HALL SfBLic^BRARw 

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 

APPEAL NO 86-279 
MELVIN WILLIAMS, Appellant [Protesting issuance on October 3, 

vs. [19S6, to Robert A. Imhoff, permit 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [to Alter a building at 250 Taylor 

[Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8605029. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (11/18) 

APPEAL NO. 86-322 
MARIO EVOLA, dba "MARIO'S SERVICE! 71 ["Suspension on November 3, 1986, 

Appellant [of Tow Car Operator permit at 

vs. [735 Filbert Street. 

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent [FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/23) 

APPEAL NO. 86-325 
UTMOT T. NGO (AKA KIM LEE), AppelTant [Denial on November 7, 1986, of 

vs. [Masseuse permit at 450B Jones 

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent [Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/27) 

APPEAL NO. 86-256 
DANA DEVOTO HEMBERGER, Appellant [Protesting issuance on Septermber 17, 

vs. [1986, to Lance Myers, permit to Alter 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [a Building at 69 Uranus Terrace. 

CTIY PLANNING APPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8605570. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/1) 

APPEAL NO. 86-324 
CHRISTOPHER SABRE, Appellant [Protesting issuance on November 5, 

vs. [1986, to McEntee Construction Company, 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [permit to Demolish a Building at 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [533 Wisconsin Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8604848. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/24) 

APPEAL NO. 86-343 
GERALD JOHNSON, Appellant [Order to Cease Violation of the 

vs. [Planning Code dated October 6, 1986, 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [at 400 NorthPoint Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/25) 

APPEAL NO. 86-344 
JUNG MIN LEE, Appellant [Order to Cease Violation of the 

vs. [Planning Code dated October 6, 1986, 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [at 400 North Point Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/25) 

APPEAL NO. 86-345 v 
RAJNEE ROUSKU, Appellant [Order to Cease Violation of the 

vs. [Planning Code dated October 6, 1986, 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [at 400 North Point Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/25) 

APPEAL NO. 86-346 
JANG MAN CHO, Appellant [Order to Cease Violation of the 

vs. [Planning Code dated October 6, 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [1986, at 400 North Point Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/25) 

APPEAL NO. 86-347 
CATHERINE TOURBARAFF, Appellant [Order to Cease Violation of the 

vs. [Planning Code dated October 6, 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [1986, at 400 North Point Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/25) 

APPEAL NO. 86-348 
SUSAN BARRETTO, Appellant [Order to Cease Violation of the 

vs. [Planning Code dated October 6, 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [1986, at 400 North Point Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/25) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, DECEMBER 3, 1986 PAGE TWO 

APPEAL NO. 86-349 
ANNA LANDA, Appellant [Order to cease Violation of the 

) vs. [Planning Code dated October 6, 1986, 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [at 400 North Point Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/25) 

APPEAL NO. 86-350 
EVA BONILLA, Appellant [Order to cease Violation of the 

) vs. [Planning Code dated October 6, 1986, 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [at 400 North Point Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/25) 

APPEAL NO. 86-351 
TERRY MADDEN, Appellant [Order to cease Violation of the 

) vs. [Planning Code dated October 6, 1986, 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [at 400 North Point Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/25) 

APPEAL NO. 86-352 
GEORGE MYERS, Appellant TOrder to cease Violation of the 

) vs. [Planning Code dated October 6, 1986, 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [at 400 North Point Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/25) 

APPEAL NO. 86-158 

PROMETHEUS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INCT^ [Denial of Project Authorization by 

Appellant [the City Planning Commission on May 

vs. [29, 1986, of a mixed-use office retail 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [building at 299 Second Street. 

CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL [FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/23) 

APPEAL NO. 86-305 
TERMINAL PLAZA CORPORATION, Appellant [Protesting issuance on October 20, 

) vs. [1986, to Five Fremont Center Associates, 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent . [permit to Alter a Building at 50 Fremont 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8609139. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/9) 

APPEAL NO. 86-306 
SAN FRANCISCANS FOR REASONABLE GROYFH"; [Protesting issuance October 20, 1986, 

Appellant [to Five Fremont Associates, permit to 

) vs. [Alter a Building at 50 Fremont Street.. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [APPLICATION NO. 8609139. 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/9) 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN VICE PRESIDENT 

MATTIE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

JOSE E. MEDINA COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing" 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
558-4421 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING 
Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a decision 
and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and 
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be made by the Board 
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a 
written request stating succinctly the grounds upon which such rehearing is requested, 
(b) If new evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show: 
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a 
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at 
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the 
previous hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations for 
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the 
Board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is 
considered by the Board. 



Robert H Feldman City and County of San Francisco 

Executive Director B0ARD 0F PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 554-6720 ' Room 154 " A > Clt y Hal1 

San Francisco, California 94102 






TK>O t 










Lu 






MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 
WEDNESDAY, ^JANUARY 7, 1987 
5:00 P.h.j ROOK 282, CITY HALL 



bc DEPT. 

JANG 1987 
San FKAHcibco 

PURLtC I.IRRADV 



MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 



APPEAL NC. 86-25" 



EMMIT KENNEDY, Appellant 

vs . 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



IT 



RALPH SKINNER, APPELLAN 

vs . 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



^J0HN W. COSTELLO, Appellant 
vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORK:, Respondent 

ABDUL FATAH SHAHIEN, Appellant 

vs. 
HEALTH DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



LLOYD B. EGENES, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



[Denial on September 29, 1986, 
[of permit to Alter a Building 
[at 51 74- 3rd Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8604719. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 

APPEAL NC. V86-242 

~ ""["Denial on September 3, 1986, of 

[Off-Street Parking and Rear Yard 
[Variance sought for property at 
T2935-2937 Fillmore Street. 
[FOP REHEARING TODAY. 

APPEAL NO. 86-292 

""["Appealing for- refund of penalty 
[imposec on October 24, 1986, for 
work done at 2037 Pierce Street. 
APPLICATION NO. 8603959. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(11/9) 



(10/25) 



APPEAL NO. 86-25 



APPEAL NO. 86-32 



APPEAL NO. 86-328 



LARRY T. JOHNSON AND DARYA FECIASKO, 

Appellant 
vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 86-32 



NISSIM LANYADOO, Appellant 
) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



YUKIHIRO R. KAKIKI, Appellant 
) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 86-330 



APPEAL NO. 86-35 



DAVID K. & NORAH Y. UYEDA, Appellants 
.) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



(12/3) 



Denial on Septemoer 18, 1986, 
of permit to Operate a Restaurant 
at 1402 Grant Avenue. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(11/8) 



Appealing denial of permit and 
notice of of incomplete permit sub- 
mittal on November 13, 1986, requiring 
recordation of a Notice of Special 
Restrictions at 1083 Dolores 
Street . 

APPLICATION NO. 8604851. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/30) 



Protesting issuance on November 12, 

1986, to Naumann-Schaadt Construction 

Co., permit to Erect a Structure at 

731 Congo Street. 

APPLICATION NO. 8611859. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/30) 



Protesting issuance on November 12 
1986, to Pietro & Sons, permit to 
Erect a Structure at 2065-2069 
Chestnut Street. 
APPLICATION NO. 8512769. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(12/30)' 



Protesting issuance on November 12, 

1986, to Pietro & Sons, permit to 

Erect a Structure at 2065-2069 

Chestnut Street. 

APPLICATION NO. 8612769. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/30) 



Protesting issuance on November 20, 

1986, to George T. Ang, permit to 

Alter a Building at 2125 Anza 

Street . 

APPLICATION NO. 8609787. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/5) 






MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, JANUARY 7 , 1987 PAGE TWO 

APPEAL NO. 86-35: 
MARJORIE D. MARTIN, Appellant ~~~" [Protesting issuance on November 2C, 

vs. [1986, to George T. Ang. permit to 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS. Respondent [Alter a Building at 2125 Anza 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8609787. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/7) 

APPEAL NO. 86-354 
KONG SHING WONG, Appellant ["Protesting issuance on November 24, 

1) vs. [1986, to James and Patricia Fogarty, 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [permit to Erect a Structure at 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [4907-4909 Mission Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8608747. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/7) 

APPEAL NC. 86-35:' 
FRANK WONG, Appellant ["Protesting issuance on November 24, 

3; vs. [1986, to James and Patricio 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Foqan>, permit to Erect a Structure 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [at "4907-4909 Mission Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8608747. 
[FOR HEARING TODA\ . (1/7) 






MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 



JERRY E. BERG 
DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN 
MATT IE J. JACKSON 
FRANK S, FUNG 
JOSE E, MEDINA 



PRESIDENT 
VICE PRESIDENT 

conn i ssi oner 

COMMISSIONER 
COMMISSIONER 



DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 



BOAR! 



PERMIT APPEALS RULES, AP.TICLE 



SECTior* i 



The order of presentation of an appeal shall De as follows: Representatives o r 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from wnose order the appeal is taker 
shall open the discussion. Tne appellant shall then present his or he 1 - case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may oe made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within tne discretion of the Board. 

In the case o^ protest appeals, tne protestants shall speak first. 

It snail oe the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
aeemec necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later tnan two days before tne appointed hearing . 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
558-4421 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING 
Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a decision 
and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and 
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be made by the Board 
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a 
written request stating succinctly the grounds upon which such rehearing is requested, 
(b) If new evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show: 
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a 
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at 
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the 
previous hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations for 
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the 
Board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is 
considered by the Board. 



Robert H. Feldraan 
Executive Director 
(415) 554-6720 



City and County of San Francisco 

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

Room 154-A, City Hall 

San Francisco, California 94102 






aOAftD OF PERfWT APPEALS 

CITY HALL 
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 



J9< 



, CFTY LIBRARIAN 
Public Library 



f 

z 



L, 



< 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 14, 1987 
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 



VOii U i'i t- NTS D 1 1 

JAN 15 1987 

SAN FRANCISCO 

PUBLIC UBRApv 



MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 



APPEAL NO. 86-354 



KWONG SHING WONG, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



FRANK WONG, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 86-356 



APPEAL NO. 86-30 



NEIGHBORHOOD PALS OF OAKLAND, INC., 

Appellants 
vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 

APPEAL NO 
FLOYD ROTH AND NANCY WILSON, 
Appellants 
vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



86-315 



APPEAL NO. 86-283 



JEANNE ZIMMERMAN, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



MAUD HALL IN, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



DAN PHIPPS, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



ROY GUINNANE, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



HARTATI MURDAYA, Appellant 
)) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 86-32 



APPEAL NO. 86-358 



APPEAL NO. 86-360 



APPEAL NO. 87-002 



Protesting issuance on November 24, 

1986, to James and Patricia Fogarty, 

permit to Erect a Structure at 

4907-4909 Mission Street. 

APPLICATION NO. 8608747. 

FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (1/7) 



Protesting issuance on November 24, 
1986, to James and Patricia 
Fogarty, permit to Erect a Structure 
at 4907-4909 Mission Street. 
APPLICATION NO. 8608747. 
FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 



(1/7) 



Revocation on October 21, 1986, of 
Charitable Organization Certificate at 
936 Geary Blvd. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/7) 



Protesting issuance on October 28, 
1986, to Artman Construction, permit 
to Erect a Structure at 2016 
Pacific Avenue. 
APPLICATION NO. 8607717S. 
FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 



(12/17) 



Protesting issuance on October 6, 

1986, to 757 North Point Partnership, 

permit to Erect a Structure at 757 

North Point Street. 

APPLICATION NO. 8605254. 

FOR REHEARING TODAY. (11/25) 



Denial on November 3, 1986, of 
permit to Alter a Building at 
459-463 Greenwich Street. 
APPLICATION NO. 8600536. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(12/13) 



T 



Denial on November 20, 1986, of permit 

to Alter a Building at 3636 Washington 

Street. 

APPLICATION NO. 8614291. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/11) 



Denial on December 2, 1986, to 

Roy Guinnane, permit to Erect a 

Structure at 315 Edgehill Way, 

(aka 325 Edgehill Way.) 

APPLICATION NO. 8514644. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/17) 

Denial of permit to Alter a 

Building at 2418 Pacific Avenue. 

Planning Commission Motion No. 10567. 

APPLICATION NO. 8512056. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/17) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, JANUARY 14, 1987 PAGE TWO 

APPEAL NO. 86-207 
PIERO BOSCACCI, Appellant ["Denial on August 4, 1986, of permit 

) vs. [to Alter a Building at 1520-22A 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Lombard Street. 

DAHI DISAPPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8606023. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (10/13) 

APPEAL NO. 86-357 
G.K. & VIKKI HART, Appellant ["Protesting issuance on November 28, 

) vs. [1986, to P.L. Yip, permit to Alter a 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Building at 979 Bryant Street. 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8613167. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/10) 

APPEAL NO. 86-359 
SHABAN PAUL DERGUTI , Appellant ["Protesting issuance on December 2, 

) vs. [1986, to Benny Yee, permit to Alter a 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Building at 1830-40th Avenue. 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8612437. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/17) j 

APPEAL NO. 86-361 
BARBARA FASKEN, Appellant ["Protesting issuance on December 4, 

) vs. [1986, to Taldan Investment Co., permit 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [to Erect a Structure at 1150 Sacramento 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8614316S. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/19) 

APPEAL NO. V86-299 
JEAN DEL CARLO, Appellant [TJenial on October 15, 1986, of 

) vs. [Rear Yard Variance sought for 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [property located at 510-512 Sanchez 

[Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/6) 

APPEAL NO. V86-302 
ARTHUR ADAMS, Appellant [Denial on October 21, 1986, of Front 

) vs. [Setback Variance sought for property 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [located at 2014-1 9th Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/7) 

PUBLIC HEARING 
Public hearing on a proposed recommendation of the Board of Permit Appeals to the Board 
of Supervisors of an amendment to Section 8 of Part III of the Municipal Code and related 
) codes to change the appeal period for permit appeals from ten (10) calendar days to 
fifteen (15) calendar days from the date of the departmental order from which the appeal 
is taken. Interested parties are invited to send comments to the Board office prior to 
this hearing. Oral presentations shall be limited to two minutes for each speaker. 



ftC n»nT APPEAR 



-CUXJOBRARiAH 
Public Library 




50 



< ( ^ 



-6F 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 21, 1987 
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 



DOCUMENTS Dl 

1987 

PUBLIC UBPadv 



MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 

Requests for Rehearing : 

Letter from Donald A. Jelinek, Esq., on behalf of appellants represented by Appeals No. 
86-343 thru 86-352 regarding the Zoning Administrator's Order to Cease Violation of the 
Planning Code at 400 North Point Street. On December 17, 1986, the Board voted 4-0 to 
uphold the Zoning Administrator's Order. (Commissioner Jackson was absent.) 

Letter from Mr. Lloyd B. Egenes, requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 86-327 . On January 
7, 1987, the Board, upon motion of President Berg, voted 4-0 (Commissioner Engmann absent) 
to overrule the department and grant the permit subject to conditions. 

Adoption of Findings of Fact : for Appeal No. 86-158 , 299 Second Street. 

APPEAL NO. 86-353 



DAVID K. & NORAH Y. UYEDA, Appellants 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



MARJORIE D. MARTIN, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



BYUNG SOON HUNT, dba "SUKY'S," 
Appellant 
vs 
POLICe'dEPARTMENT, Respondent 



STANLEY CHAN, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



DOUGLAS F. PINTER, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



JANET A. PAIGE, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



FRANCES J. MCTERNAN, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO 



"protesting issuance on November 30, 

[1986, to George T. Ang, permit to 

[Alter a Building at 2125 Anza 

[Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8609787. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (1/5) 

86-355 

[Protesting issuance on November 20, 
[1986, to George T. Ang, permit to Alter 



[Alter a Building at 2125 Anza 

[Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8609787. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 

APPEAL NO. 86-364 

["Revocation on December 2, 1986, of 
[Massage Establishment permit at 
[136 Mason Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 

APPEAL NO. 86-323 

[/Imposition of penalty for Work Done 
[at 2490-1 8th Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8607273. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 

86-368 

["Imposition on December 18, 1986, 



(1/7) 



(1/21) 



(12/23) 



APPEAL NO 



[of penalty for Work Done at 1604 
[Diamond Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8609842. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 

APPEAL NO. 86-367 

fDenial on December 8, 1986, of 
[permit to Alter a Building at 
[1050 Francisco Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8512055. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 

86-326 

["Protesting issuance on 
[November 12, 1986, to Sean Roche, 
[permit to Erect a Structure 
[at 225-25th Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8608993. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(1/27) 



(1/25) 



APPEAL NO 



(12/29) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, JANUARY 21, 1987 



PAGE TWO 



APPEAL NO 



'ATRICIA JOHNSON, Appellant 

vs. 
IEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
:ITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



86-331 

""["Protesting issuance on 
[November 12, 1986, to Sean Roche, 
[permit to Erect a Structure at 
[225-25th Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8608993. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(12/31) 



APPEAL NO. 86-363 



IEANEY, COOPER-HEANEY, SHIPERT, 
;ASSASA, AND DURRAND, Appellants 

vs. 
IEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
:ITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



IILLIAM S. MCCLURE, Appellant 

vs. 
IEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
;ITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO 



"["Protesting issuance on December 4, 
[1986, to J.M.B.K. Construction Co. 
[permit to Erect a Structure at 375 
[19th Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8610621. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 

86-365 

"["Protesting issuance on December 5, 
[1986, of permit to Denis Orioran to 
[Demolish a Building at 269 Fifth 
[Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8612079. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(1/21) 



(1/21) 



APPEAL NO. 86-366 



EONARD GANDUGLIA, Appellant 

vs. 
IEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
;ITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO, 



IHARLES DAVID RANDAZZO, Appellant 

vs. 
)EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
)ITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



["Protesting issuance on December 8, 

[1987, of permit to Flynn/Amos Co. to 

[Alter a Building at 2832 Mission 

[Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8615268. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. 

86-370 

["Protesting issuance on December 8, 



(1/25) 



[1986, of permit to Brady Real Estate, 

[Inc., to Erect a Structure at 568 

[Sanchez Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8613688. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/27) 



>ARKER DUSSEAU, Appellant 

vs. 
)EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
:iTY PLANNING APPROVAL 



rWENTY SECOND AVENUE NEIGHBORHOOD 
SROUP, Appellant 
vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



CHRISTOPHER SABRE, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 86-371 

["Protesting issuance on December 11 
[1986, of permit to Raymond Felsted 
[to Alter a Building at 2301-2317 
[Pacific Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8612544. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 

APPEAL NO. 86-372 

["Protesting issuance on December 11 

[1986, of permit to Li am Cafferkey 

[to Demolish a Building at 643-22nd 

[Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8614623. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(1/28) 



(1/28) 



APPEAL NO. 86 



373 

fProtesting issuance 



on December 
[1986, of permit ot Peter and Gary 
[McEntee to Erect a Structure at 
[533 Wisconsin Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8610316. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



12 



(1/27) 



APPEAL NO. 



DARLENE SWENSEN, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



V86-362 

[Denial 



on December 1, 1986, of 
[Off-Street Parking, Exposure of Open 
[Area for Dwelling Unit and Usable Open 
[Space Variance sought for property 
[located at 170-172-174 College Avenue. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/20) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, JANUARY 21, 1987 PAGE THREE 

PUBLIC COMMENT - Presentation shall be limited to two minutes for each speaker. 
ANNUAL ELECTION OF BOARD OFFICERS. 

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN VICE PRESIDENT 

MATTIE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

JOSE E. MEDINA COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing . " 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING 
Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a decision 
and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and 
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall hot be made by the Board 
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a 
written request stating succinctly the grounds upon which such rehearing is requested, 
(b) If new evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show: 
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a 
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at 
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the 
previous hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations for 
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the 
Board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is 
considered by the Board. 

Robert H. Feldman Cit * and County of San Francis co 

Executive Director B0ARD 0F PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 554-6720 Room 154 ~ A » Cit y Ha11 

San Francisco, California 94102 



JOAKD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

CITY HALL 
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94t«2 




p "blic Library 



■SF 



l>CeUf*!ENTS DEPT. 

JAN 2 7 1987 

Wednesday; January 28, 1987 
5:00 pa, room 282/ city hall 

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 



meeting of the board of permit appeals 
Wednesday; January 28, 1987 



SAN FRANCISCO 
PUHJJC UBRADv 



Adoption of Findings : 
Francisco Street. 



Appeal No. 86-367 , Janet A. Paige, appellant, 1050 
APPEAL NO. 86-370 



CHARLES DAVID RANDAZZO, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



BARBARA FASKEN, Appellant 

vs o 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on December 8, 1986, 
[to Brady Real Estate, Inc., of permit to 
[Erect a Structure at 568 Sanchez Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8613688. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY, (1/27) 

APPEAL NO. 86-361 

[Protesting issuance on December 4, 1986, 
[to Taldan Investment Co„,'of permit to 
[Erect a Structure at 1150 Sacramento Street. 
[APPLICATION N0 o 8614316S. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (1/19) 



APPEAL NO . 86-384 
ELISA INNING, dba "1st INNING L0UNSF7 

Appellant 
vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



[Denial on December 19, 1986, of Place of 
[Entertainment permit at 4026-24th Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/4) 



CHARANJIT SINGH OGRA, Appellant 

Vs„ 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



SAMIH M. ARIKAT, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



ANTHONY NASH, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



ANTHONY NASH, Appellant 

vs 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



ANTHONY NASH, Appellant 

vs . 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



ANTHONY NASH, Appellant 

vs „ 
DEPT, PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



ANTHONY NASH, Appellant 

vs . 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 86-390 

[Request for Refund: Imposition of Penalty 

[for work done on December 18, 1986, at 

[154 Trumbull Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8511742. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/9) 

APPEAL NO. 86-387 

[Denial on December 29, 1986, of permit to 



[Erect a Sign at 2304 Market Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8615310. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY 



(2/7) 



APPEAL NO. 86-379 

[Protesting issuance on December 19, 1986, 
[to Matthew Murphy, of permit to Erect a 
[Structure at 3865-19th Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8510317. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/4) 

APPEAL NO. 86-380 

[Protesting issuance on December 19, 1986, 
[to Matthew Murphy, of permit to Erect a 
[Structure at 3867-19th Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8510322 o 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/4) 

APPEAL NO. 86-381 

[Protesting issuance on December 19, 1986, 
[to Matthew Murphy, of permit to Erect a 
[Structure at 3869-19th Street. 
[APPLICATION NO, 8510323, 
[FOR HEARING TODAY, (2/4) 



APPEAL NO, 



86-382 
[Protesting issuance on December 19, 1986, 
[to Matthew Murphy, of permit to Erect a 
[Structure at 3871-19th Street. 
[APPLICATION NO, 8510324, 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/4) 



APPEAL NO. 86-383 

[Protesting issuance on December 19, 1986, 
[to Matthew Murphy, of permit to Erect a 
[Structure at 3873-19th Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8510325. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/4) 



MEETING OF "WE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, JANUARY 28, 1987 



PAGE M) 



374 GUERRERO STREET CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, 

Appellant 
vs o 
DEPT, PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 8 6-378 

[Protesting issuance on December 18, 1986, 



[to HD Electronics, of permit to Erect a 

[Sign at 380 Guerrero Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8614197. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/2) 



REGINA F. BLOSSER, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



STAN OSBORNE, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



LILLIAN H. LEE, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 86-385 

[Protesting issuance on December 17, 1986, 

[to Velma Crouchett, of permit to Alter a 

[Building at 17 Edgar Place. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8612824. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY,, (2/4) 

APPEAL NO. 86-386 

[Protesting issuance on December 17, 1986, 
[to Frank Duffy, of permit to Erect a 



[Structure at 1666-48th Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8604129. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(2/4) 



APPEAL NO, 



APPEAL NO, 



JAY AND JUTHIKA MASTER, Appellants" 

vs 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO, 



JAY AND JUTHIKA MASTER, Appellants" 

vs„ 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



86-388 
[Protesting issuance on December 22, 1986, 
[to Steven Fong, of permit ot Alter a 
[Building at 742-22nd Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8614318. 
[FOR HEARING T0DAY o (2/7) 

86-374 
[Revocation on December 10, 1986, of permit 
[to Alter a Building at 1098 Harrison Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8601629. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/31) 

86-375 
[Revocation on December 10, 1986, of permit 
[to Alter a Building at 1098 Harrison Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8506385. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/31) 



JAY AND JUTHIKA MASTER, Appellants 

vs . 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 86-376 

[Revocation on December 10, 1986, of 

[Plumbing permit for property located at 

[1098 Harrison Street. 

[PLUMBING PERMIT NO.. 222184. 

[FOR HEARING T0DAY o (1/31 



JAY AND JUTHIKA MASTER, Appellants 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 86-377 

[Revocation on December 10, 1986, of 

[Electrical permit for property located at 

[1098 Harrison Street. 

[ELECTRICAL PERMIT NO. 85088. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/31) 



PUBLIC COMMENT. Presentations shall be limited to two minutes for each speaker, 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN VICE PRESIDENT 

MATTIE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

JOSE E. MEDINA COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing . 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING 
Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a decision 
and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and 
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be made by the Board 
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a 
written request stating succinctly the grounds upon which such rehearing is requested, 
(b) If new evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show: 
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a 
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at 
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the 
previous hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations for 
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the 
Board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is 
considered by the Board. 



Robert H. Feldman Cn * and County of San Franc1sco 

Executive Director B0ARD 0F PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 554-6720 Room 154 " A » Cit y Ha11 

San Francisco, California 94102 



30 ^ Cwt-A** -n5P DOCUMENTS DEPT. 

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS hLB3 

WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY ^ I S87 ^l^l'^ra^v 
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 



*/^ 



MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 



Requests for Rehearing : 
(a) 



Request from Roy Guinnane for rehearing of Appeal No. 86-360 . The appellant appealed 
the denial of a permit to erect a structure at 325 Edgehill Way (or 315 Edgehill Way) 
On January 14, 1987, upon motion of Vice President Engmann, the Board voted 5-0 
to uphold the Department and deny the permit. 



(b) 



Request from Arthur Adams for rehearing of Appeal No. V86-302 . The appellant 
appealed the denial of a variance by the Zoning Administrator for property at 
2014-1 9th Street. On January 14, 1987, upon motion of Vice President Engmann, 
the Board voted 4-0 (President Berg was absent) to uphold the Zoning Administrator 
and deny the variance. 






Request from Robert W. Passmore , Zoning Administrator, for rehearing of Appeal 
(c) No. 86-321 . The appellant, Ms. Maud Hallin, appealed the denial of e permit to 

alter a building at 459-463 Greenwich Street. On January 14, 1987, upon motion of 
President Berg, the Board voted 5-0 to overrule the Zoning Administrator and grant 
the permit. 

Request for Jurisdiction : 

Letter from Jerry Regan asking the Board to take jurisdiction over Building Permit 
Application No. 8604941 issued for construction at 427-429 Filbert Street. 
Permit issued October 6, 1986 

Appeal period ended October 16, 1986 

Request for jurisdiction received January 27, 1987 

APPEAL NO. 86-301 
NEIGHBORHOOD PALS OF OAKLAND, INC" [Revocation on October 21, 1986, of 

Appellants [Charitable Organization Certificate 

vs. [at 936 Geary Boulevard. 

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent [FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/7) 

APPEAL NO. 87-003 
AMINTA MOSS, Appellant "reposition of Penalty on January 7, 

vs. [1986, for work done at 247-8th Avenue. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [APPLICATION NO. 8609738. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/17) 

APPEAL NO. V87-004 
JEFFREY CHANG, Appellant TTjenial on December 30, 1986, to 

vs. [Jeffrey Chang, of Rear Yard Variance 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [sought for property located at 161 

[Escolta Way. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/18) 

APPEAL NO. 87-005 
D. BAILEY NEFF, Appellant [Denial on January 15, 1986, of permit 

vs. [to Alter a Building at 599 South 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Van Ness Avenue. 

FIRE DEPARTMENT DISAPPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8611566. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/24) 

APPEAL NO. 87-006 
IRVIN RABIN, Appellant [Denial on January 5, 1987, of 

vs. [permit to Alter a Building at 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [1 328-1 328A Leavenworth Street. 

CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8603805. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/25) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, FEBRUARY 4, 1987 PAGE TWO 

APPEAL NO. 87-008 
JERRY HEUCKE, Appellant [Denial on January 6, 1987, to 

vs [Jerry C. Heucke, of permit to 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Alter a Building at 1644 Baker 

[Street . 

[APPLICATION NO. 8613936. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/25) ' 

APPEAL NO. 86-328 

LARRY T. JOHNSON AND DARYA FECIASKC^ [Protesting issuance on November 12, 

Appellants [1986, to Naumann-Schaadt Construction 

vs. [Company, permit to Erect a Structure 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [at 731 Congo Street. 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8611859. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/30) 

APPEAL NO. 87-001 
JOAN M. CROWLEY, Appellant [Protesting issuance on December 30, 

vs. [1986, to Phil Smith, of permit to 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Alter a Building at 2531-2533 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Greenwich Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8606878. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/14) 

APPEAL NO. 86-007 
JAYSON WECHTER, Appellant [Protesting issuance on January 7, 1987, 

vs. [to Frank Yuen, of permit to Alter e 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Building at 1318-1320 7th Avenue. 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8610026. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/25) 

APPEAL NO. 87-009 
GARY A. GOSS, Appellant [Protesting issuance on January 7, 

vs. [1987, to Brendan Donovan, of 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [permit to Demolish a Building at 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [580-5th Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8615095. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/25) 

APPEAL NO. 86-010 
OLGA K. TREUSEIN, Appellant [Protesting issuance on January 7, 

vs. [1987, to Brendan Donovan, of permit 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [to Demolish a Building at 580-5th 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8615095. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/25) 

APPEAL NO. V86-299 
JEAN DEL CARLO, Appellant [Denial on October 15, 1986, of 

vs. [Rear Yard Variance sought for property 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [located at 510-512 Sanchez Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/6) 

PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentations shall be limited to two minutes for each speaker. 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN VICE PRESIDENT 

MATT IE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S, FUNG COMMISSIONER 

JOSE E. MEDINA COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less ! If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing . 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING 
Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a decision 
and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and 
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be made by the Board 
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a 
written request stating succinctly the grounds upon which such rehearing is requested, 
(b) If new evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show: 
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a 
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at 
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the 
previous hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations for 
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the 
Board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is 
considered by the Board. 



Robert H Feldman City and Countv of San Francisco 

Executive Director BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 554-6720 Room 154 ' A » Clt y Hal1 

San Francisco, California 94102 






&WA8D OF , . r APPEALS 

CITY HALL 
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94* M 



CITY LIBRARIAN 
Public Library 



rf** DOCUMENTS DE. 

>30 -*£ 



2 



17 1 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS S an francisco 
l£ /^ r WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 18, 1987 public l.brapv 

W^ 1 ^ 5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 

1ATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 

ITEM NO. 1 Request from Christopher Sabre for rehearing of Appeal No. B6-373 . The 
ippellant appealed the issuance of a permit to erect a structure at 533 Wisconsin 
itreet. On January 21, 1987, upon motion of Commissioner Fung, the Board voted 5-0 
to uphold the department and grant tihe permit subject to conditions. Findings adopted. 

ITEM NO. 2 Request from Therese Cooper for rehearing of Appeal No. 86-363 . The appellant 
tppealed the issuance of a perait to erect a structure at 375-1 9th Avenue. On 
January 21, 1987, upon motion of Vice President Engmann, the Board voted 5-0 to uphold 
the department and grant the permit. Upon motion of Vice President Engmann, the Board 
roted 3-2 to impose conditions with President Berg and Commissioner Jackson voting 
igainst the motion. Upon motion of President Berg, the Board voted 3-2 to accept Prop F 
Findings with Vice President Engmann and Commissioner Medina voting against the motion. 

ITEM NO. 3 Request from Francis J. McTernan for rehearing of Appeal No. 86-326 . The 
appellant appealed the issuance of a permit to erect a structure at 225-2bth Avenue. On 
January 21, 1987, upon motion of Commissioner Jackson, the Board voted 5-0 to uphold 
the department and grant the permit. Prop M findings adopted. 

ITEM NO. 4 Request from Bruce Baumann on behalf of the permit holder, Brendan Donovan, 
for rehearing of Appeal No. 87-009 . The appeal was a protest to the issuance of a 
permit for the demolition of a structure at 580-5th Avenue. On February 4, 1987, upon 
notion of Commissioner Fung, the Board voted 2-2 to uphold the Department and grant the 
permit subject to the condition that the issuance of the permit be stayed pending 
clarification of the status of the Prop M findings. (The Board voted 2-2 to accept 
Prop M findings; Commissioners Engmann and Medina dissented, Commissioner Jackson was 
absent.) 

ITEM NO. 5 Request from Robert W. Passmore, the Zoning Administrator, for rehearing 
of Appeal No. 86-367 . Ms. Janet A. Paige filed the appeal. She appealed the denial 
of a permit to alter a building at 1050 Francisco Street. On January 21, 1986, the 
Board voted 5-0 to overrule the department subject to conditions. Findings of fact 
as amended were adopted January 28, 1987. 

ITEM NO. 6 Letter from Norbert Dickman, Esq., on behalf of Ms. Barbara Fasken for 
rehearing of Appeal No. 86-361. The appeal was a protest to the issuance of a permit 
to erect a structure at UbO Sacramento Street. On January 28, 1987, the Board voted 
4-0 to uphold the Department and grant the permit. Commissioner Jackson was absent. 
Findings of fact adopted. 

ITEM NO. 7 For Commissioners consideration material regarding Proposition 65, 
Disclosure of Infromation on Hazardous Waste Releases. 



APPEAL NO. V86-299 
JEAN DEL CARLO, Appellant TDenial on October 15, 1986 , of 

vs. [Rear Yard Variance sought for 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [property located at 510-512 Sanchez 

[Street. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (12/6) 

APPEAL NO. 87-014 



EDWARD W. COWING, Appellant [Denial on January 15, 1987, of 

vs. [permit to Alter a Building at 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [2570 Great Highway. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8615080. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/2) 

APPEAL NO. 87-011 
ROBERT E. REEVES, Appellant [Protesting issuance on January 12, 

vs. [1987, to May Construction, of permit 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [to Erect a Structure at 2096 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Castro Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8612301. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/11) 



I ILL I lllu Ul I nL DUHiw Ui ri_r\i il I mi lhloj i i_i_n\ur-u\ i i.\j j *. ->^ji i#iwi_ i i.w 

APPEAL NO. 87-012 
STEVEN LEONI, Appellant [Protesting issuance on January 9, 

vs. [1987, to Ben Wooster, permit to 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Alter a Building at 198 Carl 

DAHI APPROVAL [Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8612177. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/1) 

APPEAL NO. 87-013 



CAROL C. BAKER, Appellant [Protesting issuance on January 9, 

vs. [1987, to Ben Wooster, permit to 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Alter a Building at 198 Carl 

DAHI APPPROVAL [Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8612177. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/1) 

APPEAL NO. 87-015 
SAN FRANCISCANS FOR REASONABLE GROWTH"; [Protesting issuance on January 12, 

vs. [1987, to Hawley Terminal Inc., 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [permit to Alter a Building at 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [274 Brannan Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8507168. 

TFOR HEARING TODAY. (3/4) 

APPEAL NO. 87-023 

JOHN GALVES, JR., Appellant [Protesting issuance on January 15, 

vs. [1987, to Morry Goldstein, permit to 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Alter a Building at 325 Elizabeth 

[Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8610117. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/7) 

APPEAL NO. 87-024 
CLAIRE E. CAREW & JACK DRISCOLL, Appellants [Protesting issuance on January 20, 1987, 

vs. [to Emanuel and Ahuva Jolish, permit 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [to Alter a Building at 319 Panorama 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Drive. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8614716. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/9) 

APPEAL NO. 87-025 
PETER JOSEPH BOULWARE, Appellant [Protesting issuance on January 21, 

vs. [1987, to James Vietti, permit 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [to erect a structure at 118 Museum 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Way. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8603145. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/10) 

APPEAL NO. 87-016 



DON D. DURHAM, Appellant [Order to Cease Violation of the 

vs. [Planning Code issued January 16, 1987, 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [for property at 405-24th Avenue. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/3) 

APPEAL NO. 86-374 
JAY AND JUTHIKA MASTER, Appellants [Revocation on December 10, 1986, 

vs. [of permit to Alter a Building at 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [1098 Harrison Street. 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8601629. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/31) 

APPEAL NO. 86-375 



JAY AND JUTHIKA MASTER, Appellants [Revocation on December 10, 1986, 

vs. [of permit to Alter a Building at 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [1098 Harrison Street. 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8506385. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/31) 

APPEAL NO. 86-376 



JAY AND JUTHIKA MASTER, Appellants [Revocation on December 10, 1986, 

vs. [of Plumbing permit for property 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [located at 1098 Harrison Street. 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [PLUMBING PERMIT NO. 222184. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/31) 

APPEAL NO. 86-377 
JAY AND JUTHIKA MASTER, Appellants [Revocation on December 10, 1986, 

vs. [of Electrical permit for property 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [located at 1098 Harrison Street. 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [ELECTRICAL PERMIT NO. 85088. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/31) 

PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to two minutes for each speaker. 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN VICE PRESIDENT 

MATTIE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

JOSE E. MEDINA COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing . 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING 
Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a decision 
and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and 
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be made by the Board 
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a 
written request stating succinctly the grounds upon which such rehearing is requested, 
(b) If new evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show: 
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a 
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at 
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the 
previous hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations for 
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the 
Board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is 
considered by the Board. 



Robert H Feldman City and Countv of San Francisco 

Executive Director B0ARD 0F PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 554-6720 Room 1 54 " A » Cit y Hal1 

San Francisco, California 94102 



— ro ffl i yraan Alio- 



sj^/2*4?r>p/y 



mwfc vo 'O0SI0NVHJ NVS 
TIVH A1I0 

«nv3«wv iriAia3d do a«vor 



3 ^C^JU, Sf JNTSDEPT. 

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERN IT APPEALS FEB 241987 

7* 1 WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1987 «*N f ™$«° 

5:00 P.K., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 

ITEM NO. 1 Letter from Thomas Steel, Esq., on behalf of Mr. Tam V. Bui, asking the 
Board to take jurisdiction beyond the 10-day appeal period over a Massage Establishment 
permit for 931 Kearny Street. 

Permit issued February 3, 1987 

Appeal period ended February 13, 1987 

Request for jurisdiction received February 19, 1987 

ITEM NO. 2 Request from Robert W. Passmore, Zoning Administrator, for rehearing of 
Appeal No.- V86-362. The appellant, Darlene Swenson, appealed the denial of a Variance 
for property located at 170-172-174 College Avenue. On January 21, 1987, upon 
motion of Vice President Engmann, the Board voted 5-0 to overrule the Department and 
grant the variances subject to the condition that parking space be provided on a nearby 
lot. 

ITEM NO. 3 Request from Joseph A. Medina, Fire Marshall, for rehearing of Appeal 
No. 87-003" . The appellant, D. Bailey Neff, appealed the denial of a permit to 
alter a building at 599 South Van Ness Avenue. On February 4, 1986, upon motion 
of Vice President Engmann, the Board voted 4-0 to overrule the department and grant 
the permit subject to the conditions and findings as listed in a previous appeal 
regarding this property. (Appeal No. 85-044) 

APPEAL NO. 87-023 



JOHN GALVES, JR., Appellant [ Protesting issuance on 

vs. [January 15, 1987, to Morry Goldstein, 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [permit to Alter a Building at 

[325 Elizabeth Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8610117. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/7) 

APPEAL NO. 86-360 



ROY GUINNANE, Appellant [Denial on December 2, 1986, to 

vs. [Roy Guinnane, of permit to Erect 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [a Structure at 325 or 315 Edgehill 

CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL [Way. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8514644. 

[FOR REHEARING TODAY. (1/17* 

APPEAL NO. 86-386 
STAN OSBORNE, Appellant [Protesting issuance on December 17, 

vs. [1986, to Frank Duffy, permit to 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Erect a Structure at 1666-48th 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8604129. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (2/4) 

APPEAL NO. 86-369 



HANDLERY H0TELS, INC., Appellant _ _^ , [Denial on D/cember/18, 1986, of 

ys\ / C**tZ<^f^ Z*' [permit to Xlter /Building at 245 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent -fruasvcA' ZK% [Powell St/eet 
CITY PLANNING 01SAPPROVAL /?2"7 [APPLICATION NCK 8508589. 
DAHI/DlSAPPRptfAL [FOR HF/RING TODAY. (1/27) 

APPEAL NO. 87-006 
IRVIN RABIN, Appellant [Denial on January 5, 1987, of 

vs. [permit to Alter a Building at 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [1328-1328A Leavenworth Street. 

CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8603805. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/25) 

APPEAL NO. 87-029 
M & D TRUST, Appellant [Denial on January 21, 1987, of 

vs. [permit to Alter a Building at 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [2210 Jackson Street. 

CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8511218. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/14) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, FEBRUARY 25, 1987 



PAGE TWO 



APPEAL NO. 86-328 



LARRY T. JOHNSON & DARYA FECIASKO, 

Appellants 
vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 86-389 



RONALD & ERICA COWAN, Appellants 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



KAREN G. PIfRCE, Appellant 

vs , 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



LEONARD J. HEINZ, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



CHUCK LANTZ, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 87-027 



APPEAL NO. 87-028 



APPEAL NO. 87-030 



APPEAL NO. V87-022 



CAROL ANN BROWN & ROBERT LIND, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



Protesting issuance on November 12, 

1986, to Naumann-Schaadt Construction 

Company, permit to Erect a Structure 

at 731 Congo Street. 

APPLICATION NO. 8611859. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/30. 



Protesting issuance on December 22, 

1986, to Luskin & Associates, permit 
to Erect a Structure at 1258-1 8th 
Avenue. 

APPLICATION NO. 8610966. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/9) 

Protesting issuance on January 23, 1987 
to Enriqueta Colina, permit to Erect 
a Structure at 1527 York Street. 
APPLICATION NO. 8513120. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/11) 

Protesting issuance on January 20, 

1987, to Walter B. Dutcher, permit 
to Demolish a Building at 700 Persia 
Avenue. 

APPLICATION NO. 8614531. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/11) 

Protesting issuance on January 21, 
1987, to Yan Yan Chew, permit to 
Erect a Structure at 251-1 8th Avenue. 
APPLICATION NO. 8604648. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/14) 



PUbLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall 



Denial on January 13, 1986, of Rear 
Yard Variance sought for property 
located at 1324 Greenwich Street. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/22) 

De limited to two minutes for each speaker. 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERN IT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN VICE PRESIDENT 

MATTIE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

JOSE E. MEDINA COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 

• BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing . 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING 
Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a decision 
and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and 
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be made by the Board 
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a 
written request stating succinctly the grounds upon which such rehearing is requested, 
(b) If new evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show: 
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a 
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at 
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the 
previous hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations for 
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the 
Board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is 
considered by the Board. 



Robert H Feldman Cit y and Count y of San Francisco 

Executive Director B0ARD 0F PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 554-6720 Roorn 1 54 " A » Cit y Hal1 

San Francisco, California 94102 



doahdcf rn: ;Atfc 

CITY J. ALL 
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 




Public Library 









a * 







<-;: 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

WEDNESDAY, MARCH 4, 1987 

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 



DOCUMENTS DEPT, 

MAR 2 198? 

PUBLIC LIBRARY 



MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 

ITEM NO 1 Letter from Ms. B.J. Thrailkill asking the Board to take jurisdiction 
over building permit issued for constuction at 1145 Vallejo Street. 



Permit issued 

Appeal period ended 

Request for jurisdiction received 



November 1 , 1986 
November 11, 1986 
February 23, 1987 



APPEAL NO 



JOHN GALVES, JR., Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



GARY A. GOSS, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



MYRNA VOSS AND DON FRIED, Appellants 

vs. 
DEPT PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



JON E. MCMAHON, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



GORDON REALTY COMPANY, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



L. B. PLUMMER, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



JEAN C. MALLEIN, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



THOMAS C. ASPELL, Appellant 
) vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



87-023 

Protesting issuance on January 15, 

1987, to Morry Goldstein, permit 

to Alter a Building at 325-Elizabeth 

Street. 

APPLICATION NO. 8610117. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. 



APPEAL NO. 87 



APPEAL NO. 87 



APPEAL NO. 87 



APPEAL NO. 87 



APPEAL NO. 87 



APPEAL NO. 87 



APPEAL NO. 87 



(3/7) 



009 



Protesting issuance on January 7, 

1987, to Brendan Donovan, permit 

to demolish a building at 580-5th 

Avenue. 

APPLICATION NO. 8615095. 

FOR REHEARING TODAY 

032 



Appealing for refund of penalty imposed 

on February 2, 1987, for work done 

at 85 Estero Street. 

APPLICATION NO. 8600823. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/17) 

033 



Appealing for refund of penalty 

•imposed on February 5, 1987, for work 

done at 30-2nd Avenue. 

APPLICATION NO. 8700301. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/17) 

019 



Denial on January 23, 1987, of permit 

to Alter a Building at 472-478 Turk 

Street. 

APPLICATION NO. 8613899. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/4) 



017 



Protesting issuance on January 
1987, to Mancini-Mills, Inc., 
permit to Erect a Structure at 
112-114 Corwin Street. 
APPLICATION NO. 8602651. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. 

020 



15, 



(3/4) 



Protesting issuance on January 15, 

1987, to Mancini-Mills, Inc., permit 

to Erect a Structure at 116-118 Corwin 

Street . 

APPLICATION NO. 8602652. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/4) 

018 



Protesting issuance on January 15, 
1987, to Mancini-Mills, Inc., 
permit to Erect a Structure at 
120-122 Corwin Street. 
APPLICATION NO. 8602653. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(3/4) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, MARCH 4, 1987, 



PAGE TWO 



APPEAL NO. 87-021 



JEAN C. MALLEIN, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 87 



DEBRA STEIN AND COMPANY, Appellant" 

vs . 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 87 



RONALD R. ORGE, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



NORMAN WEINFELD, Appellant 
l vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



LEO AND MARGARET ROSENTHAL, 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 87 



APPEAL NO. 87 



APPEAL NO. 87 



KENNETH S. & LYNN Z. BARON, Appellants 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



Protesting issuance on January 15, 

1987, to Mancini-Mills , Inc., permit 

to Erect a Structure at 120-122 Corwin 

Street. 

APPLICATION NO. 8602653. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/4) 

031 



Protesting issuance on January 26, 

1987, to Proctor Jones, permit to 

Alter a Building at 2010 Jackson Street. 

APPLICATION NO. 8615743. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/16) 

034 



Protesting issuance on February 2, 
1987, to Pat Synan, permit to Demolish 
a Structure at 4367-25th Street. 
APPLICATION NO. 8614007. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/18) 

035 

Protesting issuance on January 27, 1987, 

to Patrick Molloy, permit to Erect a 

Structure at 1825 Turk Street. 

APPLICATION NO. 8609770. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/18) 

037 



Protesting issuance on February 3, 
1987, to Leo and Margaret Rosenthal, 
permit to Alter a Building at 
2985-21st Avenue. 
APPLICATION NO. 8613178. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(3/22) 



041 



Protesting issuance on February 6, 

1987, to Yui-Cheong and Shuet-Yi Ng, 

permit to Alter a Building at 

506-23rd Avenue. 

APPLICATION NO. 8611494. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/29) 



I PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to two minutes for each speaker, 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E, BERG PRESIDENT 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN VICE PRESIDENT 

MATTIE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

JOSE E. MEDINA COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and" received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing . 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING 
Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a decision 
and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and 
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be made by the Board 
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a 
written request stating succinctly the grounds upon which such rehearing is requested, 
(b) If new evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show: 
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a 
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at 
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the 
previous hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations for 
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the 
Board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is 
considered by the Board. 



Robert H. Feldman Cit y and County of San Francisco 

Executive Director B0ARD 0F PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 554-6720 Room 154 " A > Citv Hal1 

San Francisco, California 94102 



■ WIWHQI1 Ali g 




30Tfr6 VO 'oosjoubjj ue$ 

V-Wt wooy - ||BH Ajio 

STOddV UWU3d JO QHV08 



r" DOCUMENTS DEPT. 

IP MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS APR 6 1987 

7 WEDNESDAY, APRIL 8, 1987 SAN FRANCISC0 

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL PUBUC <-«brarv 

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 



REQUEST FOR JURISDICTION BEYOND THE 10-DAY APPEAL PERIOD 

jjEM NO. 1 Letter from Mr. Brendan ^Greene asking the Board to take jurisdiction over 
[oning Administrator's decision granting Front Setback and Rear Yard Variances for 
jroperty located at 1166 Filbert Street. 

Variance letter dated March 4, 1987 

Appeal period ended March 16, 1987 

Request for jurisdiction received March 30, 1987 

ITEM NO. 2 Status report by the Executive Director on the Board's recommendation to 
amend Section 8 of Part III of the Municipal Code by changing the 10-day permit 
appeal period to 15 days. 



APPEAL NO. 87-062 
JASWINDER MANN, Appellant [Suspension on March 6, 1987, i 

vs. [of Driver Public Vehicle 

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent [permit. ] i 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/25) 

APPEAL NO. 87-063 
DAVID S. HAHN, Appellant [Denial on March 6, 1987, of 

vs. [Dance Hall Keeper permit at 

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent [250-4th Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/25) \ 

APPEAL NO. 87-066 
WILLIAM H. JONKE, Appellant [Protesting issuance on March 9, 1987, 

vs. [to John Dearman, permit to Alter 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [a Building at 266 Sanchez Street. 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8700008. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/3) 

i 

APPEAL NO. 87-053 
JACK VOGNSEN & ILYA KALTMAN, Appellants [Denial on March 9, 1987, of permit 
vs. [to Alter a Building at 114 Belgrave 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Avenue. 

CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8611526. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/18) 

APPEAL NO. 87-058 
JARED POLSKY, Appellant [Denial on March 12, 1987, of permit 

vs. [to Alter a Building at 579 Kansas 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8701882. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/21) 

APPEAL NO. 87-055 
KENNETH RALL, Appellant [Protesting issuance on March 4, 1987, 

vs. [to Roland S. & Dianne M. Martin, ' 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [permit to Alter a Building at 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [57 Seal Rock Drive. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8701448. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/18) 

APPEAL NO. 87-057 
LINDA & EDWARD PLANT, Appellants [Protesting issuance on February 27, 

vs. [1987, to Leland C. Spiegelman, 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [permit to Alter a Building at 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [2508 Green Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8701856. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/18) 



EETIN6 OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, APRIL 8, 1987, PAGE TWO 



APPEAL NO. 87-060 
ROBERT JACKSON, Appellant [Protesting issuance on March 4, 

vs. [1987, to Chris D. Roman, permit 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [to Alter a Building at 65 Ashbury 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Terrace. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8615493. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/22 

APPEAL NO. 87-064 
PAUL LANGLEY, Appellant [Protesting issuance on March 4, 

vs. [1987, to Chris D. Roman, permit 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORK, Respondent [to Alter a Building at 65 Ashbury 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Terrace. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8615493. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/25>1 

APPEAL NO. 87-061 
NDREA TISCHLER, Appellant [Protesting issuance on March 4, 1987, 

vs. [to Andy C. Christofardis, permit 

EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [to Erect a Structure at 1644 Palou 

ITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8607479. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/22^ 

APPEAL NO. 87-067 
ARBARA PASZTY,. Appellant. [Protesting issuance on March 10, 1987, 

vs. [to Plant Inc., permit to Alter 

•EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [a Buildinq at 3277 Sacramento Street. 

ITY PLANNING APPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8701219. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/29] 

APPEAL NO. 87-068 
.ACRAMENTO STREET MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION, [Protesting issuance on March 10, 

vs. Appellant [1987, to Plant Inc., permit to 

IEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Alter a Building at 3277 Sacramento 

:ITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8601219. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/29, 

APPEAL NO. 87-070 
tflLLIAM H. WELCH, Appellant [Protesting issuance on March 10, 1987, 

vs. [to Plant Inc., permit to Alter a 

)EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Building at 3277 Sacramento Street. 

:iTY PLANNING APPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8701219. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/29; 

>UBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to two minutes for each speaker. 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN VICE PRESIDENT 

MATTIE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

JOSE E. MEDINA COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

1 

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 



The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearilTg^ 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING 
Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a decision 
and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and 
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be made by the Board 
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a 
written request stating succinctly the grounds upon which such rehearing is requested, 
(b) If new evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show: 
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a 
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at 
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the 
previous hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations for 
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the 
Board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is 
considered by the Board. 



Robert H. Feldman City and County of San Francisco 

Executive Director BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 554-6720 Room 154 ~ A » Clt y Hal1 

San Francisco, California 94102 



£aeaqn oi-iqnd 

t Mviwuan Am 



<^3*2 




20IW) VO 'OOSIOUBJj ues 

V-Wl Uioojj - ||bh Ajj3 i 






10 
r/si 



(XtUdjL Sf 

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 
WEDNESDAY/ APRIL 15, 1987 
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 



DOCUMENTS DEPT, 

\ 15 198? 

SAN FRANCISCO 
PUBLIC LIBPA^V 



MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 

ITEM NO. 1 Status report by the Executive Director on the Board's recommendation to 
amend Section 8 of Part III of the Municipal Code by changing the 10-day permit 
appeal period to 15 days. 

LINDA & EDWARD PLANT, Appellants 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 87-057 



1 



APPEAL NO. 87-060 



ROBERT JACKSON, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



PAUL LANGLEY, Appellant 

) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



L. B. PLUMMER, Appellant 
) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



THOMAS C. ASPELL, Appellant 
) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



JEAN C. MALLEIN, Appellant 
;) vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



JEAN C. MALLEIN, Appellant 
)\ vs. 

'DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



CLIMENT LOW, Appellant 
}' vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



** APPEAL NO. 87-064 



APPEAL NO. 87-017 



[Protesting issuance on February 27, 

[1987, to Leland C. Spiegelman, 

[permit to Alter a Building at 

[2508 Green Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8701856. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (4/18) 

[Protesting issuance on March 4, 

[1987, to Chris D. Roman, permit 

[to Alter a Building at 65 Ashbury 

[Terrace. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8615493. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (4/22) 

[Protesting issuance on March 4, 

[1987, to Chris D. Roman, permit 

[to Alter a Building at 65 Ashbury 

[Terrace. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8615493. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (4/25) 

[Protesting issuance on January 15, 
[1986, to Mancini -Mills, Inc., 
[permit to Erect a Structure at 
[112-114 Corwin Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8602651. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (3/4) 



APPEAL NO. 87-018 



APPEAL NO. 87-020 



APPEAL NO. 87-021 



[Protesting issuance on January 15, 
[1987, to Mancini-Mills, Inc., 
[permit to Erect a Structure at 
[120-122 Corwin Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8602653. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (3/4) 

[Protesting issuance on January 15, 

[1987, to Mancini-Mills, Inc., permit 

[to Erect a Structure at 116-118 Corwin 

[Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8602652. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (3/4) 

[Protesting issuance on January 15, 

[1987, to Mancini-Mills, Inc., permit 

[to Erect a Structure at 120-122 Corwin 

[Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8602653. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (3/4) 



APPEAL NO. 87-038 



[Imposition of Penalty on February 9. 

[1987, for work done at 1859-48th 

[Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8616066. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/22) 



APPEAL NO. 87-044 



CARL 




COMPANY 
ellant 



spondent 



§/+ 



[Revocation on February 17, 1987, of 

[Driver/Public Vehicle Pei 

[FOR REARING T0J)AY. (4/1) 




MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, APRIL 15 1987, PAGE TWO 

APPEAL NO. 87-036 
ALAN H." LAU, Appellant [Denial on February 8, 1987, of 

)' vs. [permit to Alter a Building at 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [776 Broadway. 

DAHI DISAPPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8613301. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/20) 

APPEAL NO. 87-043 
MICHAEL BOVO, Appellant [Denial on February 2, 1987, of 

) vs. j [permit to Alter a Building at 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [278-llth Street. 

FIRE DEPARTMENT DISAPPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8700959. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/1) 

APPEAL NO. V87-022 
CAROL ANN BROWN & ROBERT LIND, [Denial on January 13, 1986, of 

Appellants [Rear Yard Variance sought for 

) vs. [property located at 1324 Greenwich 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/22) 

APPEAL NO. 87-040 

MORTON E. SCHEIDT & PAUL J. SMITH, [Protesting issuance on February 6, 

Appellants [1987, to Henry Louie and Lory Yuen, 

0) vs. [permit to Alter a Building at 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [1927-31st Avenue. 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8616111. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/25) 

APPEAL NO. 87-016 
DON D. DURHAM, Appellant [Order to Cease Violation of the 

1A) vs. [Planning Code issued January 16, 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [1987, for property at 405-24th 

[Avenue. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/4) 

APPEAL NO. 87-071 
DON D. DURHAM, Appellant [Order to Cease Violation of the 

LIB) vs. [Planning Code issued January 16, 1987, 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [for the property located at 

[2301,2309, and 2315 Clement Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/2) 

APPEAL NO. 87-015 
SAN FRANCISCANS FOR REASONABLE GROWTH, [Protesting issuance on January 12, 

Appellant [1987, to Hawley Terminal Inc., 

12) vs. [permit to Alter a Building at 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [274 Brannan Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8507168. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/4) 

13) PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to two minutes for each speaker. 



SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD 

* APPEAL NO. 87-060 
ROBERT JACKSON, Appellant [Protesting issuance on March 4, 

ITEM NO. 3A) vs. [1987, to Chris D. Roman, permit 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [to Alter a Building at 65 Ashbury 

I CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Terrace. 

[SITE INSPECTION MONDAY, 
[APRIL 13, 1987, AT 4:30 P.M. 

** APPEAL NO. 87-064 
PAUL LANGLEY, Appellant [Protesting issuance on March 4, 

(ITEM NO. 3B) vs - [1987 , to Chris D. Roman, permit 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [to Alter a Building at 65 Ashbury 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Terrace. 

[SITE INSPECTION MONDAY, 
TAPRl! 13. 1987. at 4:30 P.M. 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

DOUGLAS J. EN6MANN VICE PRESIDENT 

MATTIE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

JOSE E. MEDINA COMMISSIONER 

\ 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing . 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING 
Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a decision 
and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and 
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be made by the Board 
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a 
written request stating succinctly the grounds upon which such rehearing is requested, 
(b) If new evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show: 
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a 
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at 
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the 
previous hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations for 
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the 
Board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is 
considered by the Board. 



Robert H Feldman Cit y and Count y of San Francisco 

Executive Director B0ARD 0F PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 554-6720 Room 154 ~ A > Cit y Ha11 

San Francisco, California 94102 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

City Hail - Room I54-A 
San Francisco, CA 94102 





fc<2/. 



CITY LIB RARiAK- 
Public Library 



L 

DOCUMENTS DEPT. 

' MEETING OF THE BOARD (F PERM IT APPEALS APR 2 1987 

WEDNESDAY, APRIL 22, 1987 8AN FRANC1S00 

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL PUBUC U8P4BV 






IATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 

TEM NO. 1 Letter from Karen Goodson Pierce, Esq., for rehearing of Appeal No. 87-027 . 
he appellant protested the issuance of a permit to erect a structure at 1527 York Street, 
in April 1, 1987, upon motion of Commissioner Medina, the Board voted 4-0 to uphold the 
epartment and grant the permit (Vice President Engmann was absent). 

TEM NO. 2 Letter from Robert W. Passmore, Zoning Administrator, requesting rehearing 
f Appeal No. 87-053 . The appellants in this appeal, Jack Vognsen and Ilya Kaltman, 
ppealed the denial of a permit to alter a building at 114 Belgrave Avenue. On April 8, 
987, the Board, upon motion of Prcsiaent Berg, voted 4-1 to overrule the department and 
rant the permit (Vice President Engmann dissented). 

APPEAL NO. 87-048 
AM V. BUI, dba, "THAILAND MASSAGE," [Denial on February 3, 1987, of 

Appellant [Massage Establishment permit at 

vs. [931 Kearny Street. 

0LICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent [FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/7) 

APPEAL NO. 87-079 
IUNIR S. T0TAH, Appellant [Denial on March 23, 1987, of 

vs. [Driver of Public Vehicle permit. 

0LICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent [FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/9) 

APPEAL NO. 87-076 
EIL SOFIA, Appellant [Denial on Marcn 26, 1987, of 

vs [permit to Alter a Building at 

EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [2946-2950 California Street. 

IRE DEPARTMENT DISAPPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8613114. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/5) 

APPEAL NO. 87-045 
1 AWNINGS & GRAPHICS COMPANY, Appellant [Denial on February 25, 1987, of 

vs. [permit to Alter a Building at 

•EPT . PUBLIC WORKS, ResDondent [700-25th Avenue. 

JTY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8614186. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/7) 

APPEAL NO. 87-075 
IAMES BANTA, Appellant [Protesting issuance on 

vs. [March 20, 1987, to Gianni 

•EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Construction Company, permit to 

:ITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Demolish a Building at 316 

[Madison Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8609053. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/9) 

APPEAL NO. 87-034 
tONALD R. ORGE, Appellant [Protesting issuance on February 2, 

vs. [1987, to Pat Synan, permit to 

>EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Demolish a Structure at 4367-25th 

:iTY PLANNING APPROVAL [Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8614007. 

[FOR REHEARING TODAY. (3/18) 

APPEAL NO. 87-072 
1ERRY POLON & KIKI CHING, Appellants [Protesting issuance on March 13, 

vs. [1987, to Pat Synan, permit to 

)EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Erect a Structure at 4367-25th 

:iTY PLANNING APPROVAL [Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8614006. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/2) 

APPEAL NO. 87-074 
>ATRICIA & KATHARINE KEELEY, Appellants [Protesting issuance on March 19, 

vs. [1987, to Harry Gin, permit to Alter 

)EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [a Building at 815-41st Avenue. 

:iTY PLANNING APPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8613243. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/3) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, APRIL 22, 1987, 



PAGE TWO 



APPEAL NO. 87-078 



RUSSELL W. & MARY I. PRESTING, Appellants 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 87-080 



RICHARD & ANNA SANGUINETTI, Appellants 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on March 19, 

[1987, to Naiem E. & Louris Dudum, 

[permit to Alter a Building at 

[1374 Portola Drive. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8701158. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/6) 

I 

[Protesting issuance on March 23, 
[1987, to Sheldon Milstein, 
[permit to Alter a Building at 
[174-27th Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8616208. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/10) 



APPEAL NO. V87-052 



A. A. PATRUNO, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



[Denial on February 24, 1987, 

[of Front Setback, Minimum Lot 

[Width, Minimum Lot Area, and 

[Rear Yard Variances sought for 

[property located at 1412 Lyon 

[Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/15) 



APPEAL NO. V87-054 



DONALD FLYNN, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



[Denial on March 3, 1987, of Rear 
[Yard Variance sought for property 
[located at 2212 Lake Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/18; 



PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to two minutes for each speaker 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN VICE PRESIDENT 

MATTIE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

JOSE E, MEDINA COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whicnever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
board not later than two days before tne appointed hearing . 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING 
Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a decision 
and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and 
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be made by the Board 
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a 
written request stating succinctly the grounds upon which such rehearing is requested, 
(b) If new evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show: 
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a 
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at 
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the 
previous hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations for 
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the 
Board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is 
considered by the Board. 



Robert H Fpldman Cit ^ and Count y of San Francisco 

Executive Director B0ARD 0F PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 554-6720 Room 154 " A > Cit y Hal1 

San Francisco, California 94102 



/Caeaqn 3!-iqnd 



fzyxP, 





20IW VO 'raawwj ue$ 

V-WT wooy - ||bh % 

STOddHITOd iO GHV08 



bo 



■■', 



(/JCiLjtAs ^SP 



lt<\/tl 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

WEDNESDAYS APRIL 29, 1987 

5:00 P.M., ROOM 28?. CITY HAM 



DOCUMENTS DEPT. 

APR 2 8 1987 

SAN FRANCISCO 
PUBLIC UBRARV 



\TTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 

rEM NO. 1 Adoption of Resolution of Commendation for Don Q. Lim. 

rEM NO. 2 Letter from Maureen O'Rorke, President of PAR, for information purposes. 

TEM NO. 3 Letter from Neil and Verdnique Raskin requesting the Board to take jurisdiction 
ver a building permit issued for wonk at 427-429 Filbert Street. 

TEM NO. 4 Adoption of Findings of Fact for Appeal No. 87-048. 



APPEAL NO. 87-017 



B. PLUMMER, Appellant 

vs. 
PT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
TY PLANNING APPROVAL 



IOMAS C. ASPELL, Appellant 

vs. 
:PT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
[TY PLANNING APPROVAL 



IAN C. MALLEIN, Appellant 

vs. 
EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
ITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



EAN C. MALLEIN. Appellant 

vs. 
EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
ITY PUNNING APPROVAL 



EANNE ROSE, Appellant 

vs. 
EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
ITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



3RD0N REALTY COMPANY, Appellant 

vs. 
EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
ITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



ORIS MORPHEW, Appellant 

vs 
EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
ITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



01 COALITION, Appellant 

vs. 
EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
ITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on January 15, 
[1986, to Mancini-Mills, Inc., 
[permit to Erect a Structure at 
[112-114 Corwin Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8602651. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 



(3/4) 



APPEAL NO. 87-018 



[Protesting issuance on January 15, 

[1987, to Mancini-Mills, Inc., 

[permit to Erect a Structure at 

[120-122 Corwin Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8602653. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (3/4) 



APPEAL NO. 87-020 



[Protesting issuance on January 15, 

[1987, to Mancini-Mills, Inc., permit 

[to Erect a Structure at 116-118 Corwin 

[Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8602652. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (3/4) 



APPEAL NO. 87-021 



[Protesting issuance on January 15, 

[1987, to Mancini-Mills, Inc., permit 

[to Erect a Structure at 120-122 Corwin 

[Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8602653. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (3/4) 



APPEAL NO. 87-050 



[Protesting issuance on March 2, 1987, to 
[Georgia Truttman, permit to Alter a 
[Building at 163 Vienna Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8700926. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (4/15) 



APPEAL NO. 87-019 



[Denial on January 23, 1987, of permit 

[to Alter a Building at 472-478 Turk 

[Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8613899. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/4) 



APPEAL NO. 87-073 



APPEAL NO. 



[Denial on March 24, 1987, of permit 

[to Alter a Building at 4465-17th 

[Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8605407. (6/7) 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. 

87-082 

[Protesting issuance on March 26, 1987, 
[to Minnesota Lofts, permit to Alter 
[a Building at 601 Minnesota Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8615628. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/15) 



lETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, APRIL 29, 1987. 



PAGE TWO 



NCENT MULLINS, Appellant 

vs. 
:PT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
TY PLANNING APPROVAL 



U.MA L. HALL, Appellant 

vs. 
)NIN6 ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



iARLES BRET, Appellant 

vs. 
)NING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



UNA SHENKAR, Appellant 

vs 
3NING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 87-085 

[Protesting issuance on March 24, 1987, 

[to Taldan Investment Company, permit 

[to Alter a Building at 1150 Sacramento 

[Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8703262 (ALTERED SITE). 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/13) 

APPEAL NO. 87-084 

[Order to Cease Violation of the 
[Planning Code dated March 25, 1987, 
[for property at 501 Monterey Boulevard. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/13) 



APPEAL- NO. V87-069 



[Denial on March 11, 1987, of Rear 
[Yard Variance sought for property at 
[1606 VaTlejo Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/29) 



APPEAL NO. V87-091 



[Denial on March 30, 1987, of Rear 
[Yard Variance sought for property 
[at 421 Lawton Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



JBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to two minutes for each speaker 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E, BERG PRESIDENT 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN VICE PRESIDENT 

MATTIE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

JOSE E. MEDINA COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing . 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING 
Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a decision 
and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and 
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be made by the Board 
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a 
written request stating succinctly the grounds upon which such rehearing is requested, 
(b) If new evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show: 
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a 
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at 
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the 
previous hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations for 
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the 
Board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is 
considered by the Board. 



Robert H Feldmsn Cit y and County of San Francisco 

Executive Director B0ARD 0F PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 554-6720 Room 154 " A > Cit y Hal1 

San Francisco, California 94102 



B0 # D * pmmit mms 

£% m r torn 154-A 
Mn Francisco, CA 94102 






Ci33r;^fBRAR|M7 
Public Library 



- r- I **> ^ 

2r) DOCUMENTS DEPT. 

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 
2 MAY .1 1987 

WEDNESDAY, NAY 6, 1987 HT a l30/ 

li'l SAN FRANCISCO 

5:00 P.M., ROOF! 282, CITY HALL DnR " '° " OOA ^ 






MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 

(A) Report from Executive Director on status of Board recommended Code amendment changing 
10-day appeal period to 15 days. 

(B) Letter from John R. Brower requesting the Board to take jurisdiction over a building 
jermit issued for construction of an 18-unit building at 250-19th Avenue. 

>ermit issued January 21, 1987 

Appeal period ended February 2, 1987 

tequest for jurisdiction received April 22, 1987 

"he Board upheld a companion permit for an 18-unit building at 251-18th Avenue on 
: ebruary 25, 1987. 

I C) Letter from Paul J. and Clara Smith requesting the Board to grant a rehearing on 

ippeal No. 87-040. The Smiths had protested the issuance of a permit to alter a building 

-t 1927-31st Avenue. On April 15, 1987, the Board voted 4-1 to uphold the permit, 
ice President Engmann dissenting. 

APPEAL NO. 87-050 
EANNE ROSE, Appellant [Protesting issuance on March 2, 1987, 

vs. [to Georgia Truttman, permit to Alter 

EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [a Building at 213 Carl Street. 

ITY PLANNING APPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8700102. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (4/15) 

APPE AL NO. 87-044 
ARL ROTH, dba "YELLOW CAB COMPANY", [Revocation on February 17 1987, of 

Appellant [Driver Public Vehicle Permit, 

vs. [FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/1) 

OLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 

APPEAL NO. 87-063 
WID S. HAHN, Appellant [Denial on March 6, 1987, of permit for 

vs. [Dance Hall Keeper at 250-4th Street. 

OLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent [FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/25) 

APPEAL NO. 87-083 
WES R. BRENNAN, Appellant [Revocation on March 26, 1987, of permit 

vs. [for Driver Public Vehicle. 

DLICE DEPT., Respondent [FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/13) 

APPEAL NO. 87-093 

*ED HERRERA, dba "THE STONE", Appellant [Denial on April 3, 1987, of permit for 

vs. [Dance Hall Keeper at 412 Broadway Street, 

DLICE DEPT., Respondent [FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/19) 






APPEAL NO. 87-097 

\TRICIA FRANK, dba "TIFFANI'S MASSAGE", [Denial on April 13, 1987, of Massage 

Appellant [Establishment permit at 483 Broadway 

vs. [Street. 

)LICE DEPT. Respondent [FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/24) 

APPEAL NO. 87-042 

fiVIN D. LALLY, Appellant [Protesting issuance on February 9, 1987, 

\ vs. [to Luke Chan, permit to Alter a Building 

CPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [at 2362-Glst Avenue. 

C'Y PLANNING APPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8616202. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/29) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, MAY 6, 1987. 

APPEAL NO. 87-086 
ANTHONY R. TUCKER, Appellant [Protesting issuance on March 27, 1987, 

vs. [to Wilkin Tom, permit to Erect a Structun 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [at 243-245 15th Avenue. 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8510956. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/16) 

APPEAL NO. 87-092 
ETTA HOLT, Appellant [Protesting issuance on April 1, 1987,: to 

vs. [T. Shelton Powers, cermit to Alter a 

'DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent X Buildin 9 at 388-5th' Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8703891. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/19) 

APPEAL NO. 87-094 
RICHARD A. PENNINGTON, Appellant [Protesting issuance on April 2, 1987, to 

vs. [Stephen Goldstine, permit 10 Erect a 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Rapondent [Structure at 1331 Green Street. 

PITY PLANNING APPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8634560.. 

APPEAL NO. 87-095 
ETHEL PETERSON, Appellant [Protesting issuance on April 6, 1987, 

vs. [to James Kevin Mulfoern, permit to Alter 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [a Building at 415 Victoria Street. 

:iTY PLANNING APPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8608018. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/24) 

APPEAL NO. 87-096 
DANIEL RASKIN, Appellant [Protesting issuance on April 9, 1987, 

vs. [to Paul & Sandra Schwartz, permit to 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Erect a Structure at 30 Bonview Way. 

:iTY PLANNING APPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8701808. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/24) 

APPEAL NO. 87-090 
IEBRA AWNING COMPANY & MCDONALD'S CORPORATION, [Order to Cease Violation of the Planning 

Appellants [Code, dated March 31, 1987, for property 
vs. [located at 601 Grant Avenue. 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/18) 

) i PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to two minutes for each speaker. 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN VICE PRESIDENT 

MATT IE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

JOSE E. MEDINA COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

i 

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing . 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING 
Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a decision 
and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and 
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be made by the Board 
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a 
written request stating succinctly the grounds upon which such rehearing is requested, 
(b) If new evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show: 
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a 
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at 
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the 
previous hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations for 
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the 
Board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is 
considered by the Board. 



Robert H. Feldman 
Executive Director 
(415) 554-6720 



City and County of San Francisco 

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

Room 154-A, City Hall 

San Francisco, California 94102 



Nviwaan aid 



ZOM VO '00SI0UBJJ UBC 

V-Wt ujooh - ||bh fyn 



30 

2 

'join 



Qf+tU 



Sf 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

WEDNESDAY, MAY .20, 1987 

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 



DOCUMENTS DEPT. 

MAY 3 01987 

SAN FRANCISCO 
PuRUC IJBRAPV 



MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 

ITEM NO. 1 Adoption of Findings of Fact for Appeal No. 87-085, 1150 Sacramento Street. 



ITEM NO. 2 Information item for Commissioners from Bernal Heights East Slope Preservation 



Committee. 

ITEM NO. 3 Letter from Carolyn A. Gold, attorney for tenants of 2029 Fillmore Street, 



requesting the Board to take jurisdiction over Building Permit Application No. 8701753. 
Permit issued April 28, 1987 

Appeal perioa ended May 8, 1987 

Request for jurisdiction received May 11, 1987 

ITEM NO. 4 Request from Alice Barkley, Esq., on behalf of appellants in Appeals Nos. 87-017 
87-018, 87-020, and 87-021. The appellants protested the issuance of building permit 
issuea to erect three two-family buildings at 112-122 Corwin Street. On April 29, 1987, 
upon motion of Presiuent Berg, the Boaro voted 4-1 (Vice President Engmann dissenting) to 
uphola the department ano grant the permits subject to conditions. 



ITEM NO. 5 Letter from Munir Totah requesting rehearing of Appeal 87-079. The appellant 
appealed the denial of a permit to Drive a Public Vehicle. On April 22, 1987, upon motion 
of Commissioner Jackson, the Board voted 3-2 to overrule the department. Vice President 
Engmann and Commissioner Medina dissented. Since four votes are required to overrule a 
department, the denial is deemed upheld. 

ITEM NO. 6 Letter from members of the 601 Minnesota Street Coalition requesting rehearing 
of Appeal No. 87-082. The Coalition appealed the issuance of a permit to alter a building 
at 601 Minnesota Street. On April 29, 1987, upon motion of President Berg, the Board voted 
5-0 to uphold the department and grant the permit. 



APPEAL NO. 87-088 



MAURICE LAYMON, ROBERT & ANN CHEONG , 
dua THIRD WAVE DANCE STUDIO THEATER, 

Appellants 
vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



[Denial on April 3, 1987, of permit 
[for Dance Hall Keeper and Place of 
[Entertainment at 3316-24th Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/17) 



APPEAL NO. 87-102 



) 



JOSEPH POLLIO, Appellant 

vs. 
3 0LICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 

JAMES TOOLATE, Appellant 

vs. 
\RTS COMMISSION, Respondent 

BARBARA EMLEY, Appellant 

vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
:iTY PLANNING APPROVAL 
: IRE DEPT. APPROVAL 

-ILLIAN JOHNSON & JAMES SCHARFER, 

Appellants 
vs. 
)EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
:iTY PLANNING APPROVAL 

ROBERT MAYER, Appellant 
) vs. 
)EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
:iTY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Denial on April 10, 1987 
[Public Vehicle permit. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



of Driver 



(5/30) 



APPEAL NO. 87-099 



[Revocation on April 9, 1987, of 
[Street Artist Certificate No. 3078, 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(5/25) 



APPEAL NO. 87-089 



[Revocation on March 27, 1987, of 
[permit to Alter a Building at 535 
[Ramsell Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8501029. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(5/17) 



APPEAL NO. 87-101 



[Protesting issuance on April 10, 1987, 
[to Robert Mendle, permit to Alter a 
[Building at 655 Sanchez Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8703631. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/30) 



APPEAL NO. 87-077 



[Protesting issuance on March 20, 1987, 
[to Philip Williams, permit to Alter 
[a Building at 19 Edith Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8615573. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/5) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, RAY 20, 1987 



PAGE TWO 



APPEAL NO. 87-098 



BENSON LAI, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on April 6, 1987, 
[to Mark & Natal iya Kirovsky, permit to 
[Alter a Building at 1608-16th Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8615327. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/25) 



APPEAL NO. 87-100 



MARCEL & CHRISTINE ELICAGARAY, Appellants 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on April 8, 1987, 

[to Tommy and Maybelle Ow, permit 

[to Alter a Building at 2120 Funston 

[Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8613396. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/27) 



RICHARD DERMEG, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



LESLIE C. WINDER, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



CAROL ANN BROWN AND ROBERT LIND, 

Appellants 
vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 

A. A. PATRUNO, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 87-103 

[Protesting issuance on April 2, 1987, 

[to Stephen and Jo Moorhouse, permit 

[to Erect a Structure at 722 Duncan 

[Street . 

[APPLICATION NO. 8610215. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/30) 

APPEAL NO. 87-104 

[Protesting issuance on April 17, 1987, 

[to Maceeves Martinez, permit to 

[Alter a Building at 5479 Mission 

[Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8701513. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/1) 

APPEAL NO. V87-022 

[Denial on January 13, 1986, of 

[Rear Yard Variance sought for property 

[at 1324 Greenwich Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/22) 

APPEAL NO. V87-052 

[Denial on February 24, 1987, 

[of Front Setback, Minimum Lot Area, 

[and Rear Yard Variances sought for 

[property at 1412 Lyon Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/15) 



•OPUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to two minutes for each speaker, 






MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN VICE PRESIDENT 

MATT IE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

JOSE E. MEDINA COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less" ! If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing . 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING 
Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten aays from the date of a decision 
and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and 
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be made by the Board 
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a 
written request stating succinctly the grounds upon which such rehearing is requested, 
(b) If new evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show: 
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a 
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at 
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the 
previous hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations for 
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the 
Board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is 
considered by the Board. 



Robert H Feldman Cit ^ and County of San Franclsco 

Executive Director B0ARD 0F PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 554_6720 Room 154 - A > Cit y Hal1 

San Francisco, California 94102 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

City Haii - Room 154-A 
San Francisco, CA 94102 




OCjJ 



&ITV LIBRARIAN 
Public Library 






> ( 






MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 

ITEM NO. 1 Letter from John Ladd requesting the Board to take jurisdiction over a 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 5, 1987 
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 



DOCUMENTS DEPT. 
i 4 1987 

SAN FRANCISCO 
PllRl.ir. I 1RPAOV 



building permit issued for Alterations to a building at 1902 Baker Street. 
Permit issued May 5, 1987 

Appeal period ended May 15, 1987 

Request for jurisdiction received May 19, 1987 

ITEM NO. 2 Letter from Chanh Xuoi Van requesting the Board to take jurisdiction over 



City Planning disapproval of permit to legalize a garment shop at 242 Balboa Street. 
Date of Notification letter March 16, 1987 

Appeal period ended March 26, 1987 

Request for jurisdiction received May 20, 1987 

ITEM NO. 3 Letter from Daniel Raskin and Claudia Viek requesting the Board to grant 
a rehearing on Appeal No. 87-096. The appellants had protested the issuance of a 
permit to erect a structure at 30 Bonview Street. On May 6, 1987, the Board voted 4-0 
to uphold the department and grant the permit subject to conditions. Vice President 
Engmann was absent. 

ITEM NO. 4 Letter from Joseph Pol 1 io requesting the Board to grant a rehearing of 
Appeal No. 87-102. The appellant has protested the denial of Driver of Public Vehicle 
permit. On May 20, 1987, the Board voted 3-1 to overrule the Department and grant the 
permit. Needing four votes to over turn the department, the permit was denied. President 
Berg dissented and Commissioner Fung was absent. 

ITEM NO. 5 Letter from Kate Dixon, Esq., on behalf of James Tool ate, request rehearing 
of Appeal No. 87-099. The appellant had protested the revocation of his Street Artist 
Certificate. On May 20, 1987, the Board voted 3-1 to overrule the Department and grant 
the permit. Needing four votes to over turn the department, the permit was denied. Vice 
President Engmann cast the dissenting vote. 



MAURICE LAYM0N, ROBERT & ANN CHE0NG, 
dba THIRD WAVE DANCE STUDIO THEATER, 

Appellants 
vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 87-088 



[Denial on April 3, 1987, of permit 
[for Dance Hall Keeper and Place of 
[Entertainment at 3316-14th Street. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (5/17) 



CLEMENT ANGELI, Appellant 
vs. 
. POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 

HARTATI MURDAYA, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



PLANT BUILDERS, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 87-107 



[Suspension on April 14, 1987, of 
[Driver Public Vehicle permit. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(6/8) 



APPEAL NO. 87-002 



APPEAL NO. 87-081 



i! 



, WALTER JANG, Appellant 
6 - vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 87-106 



[Denial on January 2, 1987, of 

[permit to Alter a Building at 2418 

[Pacific Avenue. Planning Commission 

[Motion 10567. 

[APPLICATION NO. 85172056. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/17) 

[Denial on April 2, 1987, of permit 

[to Alter a Building at 3663 Washington 

[Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8701975. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/12) 

[Denial on April 15, 1987, of permit 

[to Alter a Building at 180 Blake 

[Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8600118. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/8) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, JUNE 3, 1987, 



PAGE TWO 



ROSE M. TARANTINO, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



JERTHA S. NELSON, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 87-109 



[Protesting issuance on April 21, 1987, 

[to Judson J. and Winnie Leong, permit' 

[to Alter a Building at 154 Country 

[Club Drive. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8616402. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/6) 



APPEAL NO. V87-108 



[Denial on April 17, 1987, of 
[Off-Street Parking Variance sought 
[for property located at 527-26th Avenue 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/6) 



APPEAL NO. V87-054 

[Denial on March 3, 1987, of Rear 
[Yard Variance sought for property 
[at 2212 Lake Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/18) 

} PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to two minutes for each speaker 



30NALD FLYNN, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 



JERRY E, BERG 
DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN 
MATT IE J. JACKSON 
FRANK S. FUNG 
JOSE E. MEDINA 



PRESIDENT 

VICE PRESIDENT 

COMMISSIONER 

COMMISSIONER 

COMMISSIONER 



DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL. A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing . 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
554-6720 'for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING 
Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a decision 
and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and 
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be made by the Board 
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a 
written request stating succinctly the grounds upon which such rehearing is requested, 
(b) If new evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show: 
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a 
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at 
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the 
previous hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations for 
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the 
Board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is 
considered by the Board*. 



Robert H. Feldman 
Executive Director 
(415) 554-6720 



City and County of San Francisco 

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

Room 154-A, City Hall 

San Francisco, California 94102 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

City Hall - Room 154-A 
San Francisco, CA 94102 




l/tH^ 



Public Library 



DOCUMENTS D£PT. 

H/?7 MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS SuSJcu^A 

WEDNESDAY, JUNE 10, 1987 
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 

) MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 

ITEM NO. 1 Mission Bay Status Report . Information item for Commissioners. 

ITEM NO. 2 Interim Controls Requiring That Demolition Be Stayed Until Issuance of 
Building Permit . Information item for Commissioners. 

ITEM NO. 3 Letter from Guy Dalpe requesting the Board to take Jurisdiction over 

the action of the Police Commission denying Chief of Police Jordan's recommendation that 

Mr. Edmund Jung's motorized Rickshaw Permits be revoked. 

ITEM NO. 4 Letter from Richard Dermeg requesting the Board to grant a rehearing on Appeal 
No. 87-103. The appellant had protested the issuance of a permit to erect a structure 
at 722 Duncan Street. On May 20, 1987, the Board voted 4-0 to uphold the Department 
and grant the permit. Commissioner Fung was absent. 

APPEAL NO. 87-019 
GORDON REALTY COMPANY, Appellant [Denial on January 23, 1987, of permit 

vs. [to Alter a Building at 472-478 Turk 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Street. 

CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8613899. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/4) 

APPEAL NO. 87-110 

HEINZ & CHRISTINE H0FMANN, Appellants [Protesting issuance on April 23, 

A vs. [1987, to Sing & Christine Wong, 

DEPT. PU0LIC WORKS, Respondent [permit to Alter a Building at 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [1983-33rd Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8701663. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY .(6/9) 

APPEAL NO. 87-113 " 
JOSEPHINE K. RILEY, Appellant [Protesting issaance on April 24, 

vs. [1987, to Sing ft Christine Wong, permit 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [to Alter a Building at 1983-33rd 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Avenue. 

[APPPLICATION NO. 8701663. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/10) 

APPEAL NO. 87-111 
JOSEPH GOLDMAN, Appellant [Protesting issuance on April 24, 1987, 

vs [to Lew H. 6 Hiroko Makino, permit to 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Alter a Building at 415 El Camino 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Del Mar. "^ aM 

[APPLICATION NO. 8700487. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/9) 

APPEAL NO. 87-114 
DORIS F. HADLEY & CHARLES J. LEWIN, Appellants [Protesting issuance on April 24, 

vs. [1987, to Stephen and Juana D. Sui , 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [permit to Alter a Building at 730-7th 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8611131. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/13) 

APPEAL NO. 87-116 
18TH AVENUE RESIDENTIAL COALITION, Appellants [Protesting issuance on May 1, 1987, 
)/i vs. • [Yee Lum permit to Demolish a 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [building at 148-18th Avenue. 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8705144. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/22) 

APPEAL NO. 87-117 
18TH AVENUE RESIDENTIAL COALITION, Appellants [Protesting issuance on May 1, 1987, 
5E VS- [to Edwin Lum, permit to Erect a 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Structure at 148-18th Avenue. 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8604857. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/22) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, JUNE 10,1987, 



PAGE TWO 



MYRA PAK, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



THE TENANTS, Appellants 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



NASH KHAYAT, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



i] PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall 



APPEAL NO. 87-118 

[Protesting issuance on May 6, 

[1987, to Butch Swanson, permit to 

[Erect a Structure at 1906-20th 

[Street. 

{APPLICATION NO. 8606136. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/23) 

APPEAL NO. 87-127 

[Protesting issuance on May 6, 

[to Butch Swanson, permit to Erect 

[a Structure at 1906-20th Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8606136. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/27) 

APPEAL NO. V87-059 

[Denial on March 3, 1987, of 
[Off-Street Parking and Rear Yard 
[Variance sought for property at 
[2739-2741 Geary Blulevard. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY (4/22) 

be limited to two minutes for each speaker. 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E, BERG PRESIDENT 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN VICE PRESIDENT 

MATTIE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S, FUNG COMMISSIONER 

JOSE E. MEDINA COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL .A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing" - " 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING 
Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a decision 
and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and 
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be made by the Board 
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a 
written request stating succinctly the grounds upon which such rehearing is requested, 
(b) If new evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show: 
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a 
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at 
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the 
previous hearing shall oe deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations for 
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the 
Board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is 
considered by the Board*. 



Robert H Felclman City and Count y of San Francisco 

Executive Director B0ARD 0F PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 554-6720 Room 154 - A > Cit y Ha " n 

San Francisco, California 94102 






[J CTGddVJ ^ttfflWS 



30 



2 



\ii 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 
WEDNESDAY/ JUNE 17, 1987 
5:00 P, EL, ROOM 282, CITY HALL 



DOC U fri £ N TS DEPT, 

SAN FRANCISCO 
»-«'«• JC I IRRARV 



MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 



APPEAL NO. 87-111 



JOSEPH GOLDMAN, Appellant 
2 vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 87-006 



IRVIN RABIN, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



HAROLD MADISON, Appellant 
4 vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



RICHARD REINECCIUS, Appellant 
5) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



BRUCE DAVIES, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



BRUCE DAVIES, Appellant 
5i vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
. CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



BRUCE DAVIES, Appellant 
5 vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



WILLIAM POMERANZ, Appellant 
6 vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 87-119 



APPEAL NO. 87-120 



APPEAL NO. 87-122 



APPEAL NO. 87-123 



APPEAL NO. 87-124 



APPEAL NO. 87-126 



Protesting issuance on April 24, 

1987, to Lew H. & Hiroko 

Makino, permit to Alter a 

Building at 415 El Camino 

Del Mar. 

APPLICATION NO. 8700487. 

FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (6/9) 



Denial on January 5, 1987, of 
permit to Alter a Building at 
1 328-1 328A Leavenworth Street. 
APPLICATION NO. 8603805. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(2/24) 



Protesting issuance on May 5, 

1987, to Michael Krakow, permit 

to Alter a Building at 1255 

Shafter Street. 

APPLICATION NO. 8608721. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/23) 

Protesting issuance on May 6, 

1987, to Lynn Susoeff, permit to 

Erect a Structure at 8 Southern 

Heights Avenue. 

APPLICATION NO. 8602215. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/24) 

Protesting issuance on May 6, 

1987, to Lynn Susoeff, permit 

to Erect a Structure at 2 Southern 

Heights Avenue. 

APPLICATION NO. 8602205. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/24') 

Protesting issuance on May 6, 

1987, to Lynn Susoeff, permit to 

Erect a Structure at 4 Southern 

Heights Avenue. 

APPLICATION NO. 8602216. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/24) 

Protesting issuance on May 6, 

1987, to Lynn Susoeff, permit 

to Erect a Structure at 6 Southern 

Heights Avenue. 

APPLICATION NO. 8602214. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/24) 

Protesting issuance on May 14, 

1987, to Cheryl Price, permit 

to Alter a Building at 418 

Valley Street. 

APPLICATION NO. 8701866. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/27) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, JUNEI7, 1987, PAGE TWO 

APPEAL NO. 87-128 
SAN FRANCISCO BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION [Protesting issuance on May 7, 

TRADES COUNCIL, Appellants [1987, to EJM & Associates Construction 

vs. [Company, permit to Erect a Structure 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [at 438-5th Avenue. 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8701198. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/27) 

APPEAL NO. -87-121 
GENE LAM, Appellant [Protesting issuance on May 14, 

vs. [1987, to William J. Filter, permit 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [to Alter a Building at 3939 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Washington Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8703827. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/23) 

APPEAL NO. 87-129 
JOHN V. GIUSTI, Appellant [Order to Cease Violation of the 

vs. . [Planning Code dated May 14, 1987, 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [for property at 4406-18th 

• • [Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/30) 

APPEAL NO. V87-125 
NICHOLAS JARDINE, Appellant [Denial on May 6, 1987, of Rear 

vs. [Yard Variance sought for property 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [at 969 Hayes Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/27) 

PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to two minutes for each speaker. 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN VICE PRESIDENT 

MATTIE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

JOSE E. MEDINA COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL .A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must i>e made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two Jays before the appointed hearing . 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING 
Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a decision 
and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and 
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be made by the Board 
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a 
written request stating succinctly the grounds upon which such rehearing is requested, 
(b) If new evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show: 
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a 
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at 
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the 
previous hearing shall «be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations for 
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the 
Board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is 
considered by the Board*. 



Robert H Feldman Cit y and Count y of San Francisco 

Executive Director B0ARD 0F PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 554-6720 Room 154 " A > Cit y Hal1 

San Francisco, California 94102 







&c<?) l 



«fr ITY LIBRARIAN — 
Public Library 









II DOCUMENTS DEPT. 

2 MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS m f 3 } o B7 

WEDNESDAY, JULY 1, 1987 3AN FRAN J,sco 

5:00 P, PL, ROOM 282, CITY HALL PUBUC ubrabv 

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 

ITEM NO. 1 Letter from Stephen Shi, permit holder, requesting the Board to grant a 
rehearing of Appeal No. 87-114 . The appellants had protested the issuance of a permit 
to alter a building at 730-7th Avenue. On June 10, 1987, upon motion of. Commissioner 
Fung, the Board voted 4-0 to uphold the department and grant the permit subject to 
conditions. Commissioner Jackson was absent. 

ITEM NO. 2 Letter from the 18th Avenue Residential Coalition requesting that the 
Board grant a rehearing of Appeal No. 87-117 . The appellants had protested the issuance 
of a permit to erect a structure at 148-1 8th Avenue. On June 10, 1987, the Board voted 
3-1, Vice President Engmann dissenting, to uphold the department and grant the permit. 
Commissioner Jackson was absent. 

ITEM NO. 3 Letter from Walter Jang requesting the Board to grant a rehearing on Appeal 
No. 87-lTJF . The appellant had protested the denial of a permit to alter a building at 
180 Blake Street. On June 3, upon motion of Commissioner Fung, the Board voted 5-0 
to uphold the department and deny the permit. 

ITEM NO. 4 Letter from Robb A. Scott, Esq., on behalf of Nash Khayat, requesting the 
Board to grant a rehearing of Appeal No. V87-059 . The appellant had appealed the denial 
of a variance for property at 2739-2741 Geary Boulevard. On June 10, 1987, upon motion 
of Vice President Engmann, the Board voted 4-0 to uphold the department and deny the 
variance. Commissioner Jackson was absent. 

ITEM NO. 5 Letter from John J. Riley on behalf of Josephine K. Riley, requesting the 
Board to grant a rehearing of Appeal No. 87-113 . The appellant had protested the issuance 
of a permit to alter a building at 1983- 33rd Avenue. On June 10, 1987, upon motion of 
Commissioner Fung, the Board voted 4-0 to uphold the department and grant the permit 
subject to conditions. Commissioner Jackson was absent. 

ITEM NO 6 Letter from Joseph Goldman requesting the Board to grant a rehearing of Appeal 
No. 87-1 TT . The appellant had protested the issuance of a permit to alter a building 
at 415 El Camino Del Mar. Oh June 17, 1987, upon motion of President Berg, the Board voted 
4-0 to uphold the department and grant the permit subject to a condition. Commissioner 
Jackson was absent. 

ITEM NO. 7 Information item for Commissioners regarding Proposed Residential Interim 
Controls for the Richmond/Sunset area. 

APPEAL NO. 87-088 
MAURICE LAYM0N, ROBERT & ANN CHEONG^ [Denial on April 3, 1987 of permit 

dba THIRD WAVE DANCE STUDIO THEATER, [for Dance Hall Keeper and Place of 

Appellants [Entertainment at 3316-24th Street, 

vs. [FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/17) 



POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 87-120 



RICHARD REINECCIUS, Appellant [Protesting issuance on May 6, 

vs. [1987, to Lynn Susoeff, permit to 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Erect a Structure at 8 Southern 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Heights Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8602215. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (6/24) 

APPEAL NO. 87-122 



BRUCE DAVIES, Appellant [Protesting issuance on May 6, 

vs. [1987, to Lynn Susoeff, permit 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [to Erect a Structure at 2 Southern 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Heights Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8602205. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (6/24) 

APPEAL NO. 87-123 



BRUCE DAVIES, Appellant TProtesting issuance on May 6, 

vs. [1987, to Lynn Susoeff, permit to 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Erect a Structure at 4 Southern 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Heights Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8602216 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (6/24) 



hEETINC- OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, JULY 1, 1987 



PAGE TWO 



APPEAL NO. 87-12^ 



BRUCE DAVIES, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



JOSEPH POLLIO, Appellant 

vs. 
POLICE DEPT., Respondent 

JAMES TOOLATE, Appellant 

vs. 
ARTS COMMISSION, Respondent 

DAVID HOWARD, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKDS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



BARBARA DELANEY, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



LINDA S. CUENCO, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



PATRICE THOMPSON, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



T Protesting issuance on May 6, 

[1987, to Lynn Susoeff, permit 

[to Erect a Structure at 6 Southern 

[Heights Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8602214. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (6/24) 



APPEAL NO. 87-102 



APPEAL NO. 87-099 



T Denial on April 10, 1987, of Driver 
[Public Vehicle permit. 
[FOR REHEARING TODAY. (5/30) 

"[Revocation on April 9, 1987, of 
[Street Artist Certificate No. 3078. 
[FOR REHEARING TODAY. (5/25) 



APPEAL NO. 87-115 



T Denial on April 27, 1987, of 
[permit to Alter a Building at 405 
[Clayton Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8511545. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/16) 



APPEAL NO. V87-130 



TDenial on May 13, 1987, of Rear Yard 
[Variance sought for property at 
[1279-44th Avenue. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/5) 



APPEAL NO. 87-132 



TDenial on May 27, 1987, of permit 
[to Alter a Building at 2265 Beach 
[Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8607314. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/7) 



APPEAL NO. 87-131 



"[ Protesting issuance on May 15, 1987, 
[to Alvin E. Mork, permit to Alter a 
[Building at 447-40th Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 870510E. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/5) 



APPEAL NO. 87-133 



DAVID A GROSS & NEIGHBORS, Appellants 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
DAHI APPROVAL 



T Protesting issuance on May 19, 1987, 
[to Kevin Webb, permit to Alter a 
[Building at 3524-22nd Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8700486. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/7) 



APPEAL NO. 87-134 



FRANK L. BURRELL, JR., Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



MICHAEL C. BECKER, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



T Protesting issuance on May 22, 1987, 
[to Cheryl Carson, permit to Alter a 
[Building at 2502 Broadway Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8705212. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/8) 



APPEAL NO. 87-135 



APPEAL NO. 87-136 



TWIN PEAKS EAST NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, 

Appellant 
vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



T Protesting issuance on May 21, 1987, 
[to Henry Domeniconi, permit to Alter 
[a Building at 1580-15th Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8705212. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (&/8) 

T Protesting issuance on May 21, 1987, 
[to Tom Louie, permit to Alter a 
[Building at 131 Corbett Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8700199. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/11) 



APPEAL NO. 87-137 



ROBERT L. NILSEN, Appellant 
1 vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



TProtesting issuance on May 20, 1987, to 
[D. Audrey Owen, permit to Alter a 

[Building at 569 Buena Vista West. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8701713. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/11) 






SPECIAL MEETING OF THF BOARD 

* APPEAL NO. 87-12C 

UCHARD REINECCIUS, Appellant iProtesting issuance on May 6, 1987, 

W£' „ lln vs - [to Lynn Susoeff, permit to 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Erect a Structure at 8 Southern Heiahts 

:iTY PLANNING APPROVAL [Avenue. wutnern heignts 

[SITE INSPECTION TUESDAY, 
[JUNE 30, 1987, AT 5:00 P.K. 

APPEALS NOS. 87-122, 87-123 AND 87-12^ 
IRUCE DAVIES, Appellant [Protesting issuance on May 6, 1987, 

* NO. 3B, 3C, and 3D) [ t0 Lynn Susoeff, permit to Erect a' 

)EPT. PUBLIC WORKS. Respondent [Structure at 2 Southern Heights Avenue, 

[4 Southern Heights Avenue, and 6 
[Southern Heights Avenue. 
[SITE INSPECTION TUESDAY. 
[Jui'JE 30, 1387, at 5:00 P.M. 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPFA1 § 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN VICE PRESIDENT 

MATTIE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

JOSE E. MEDINA COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

~ BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal Is taker, 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall mot exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments' must be made in writing, and received 4>y the 
Board not later than two flays before the appointed hearing . 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed =ms read, and such must me 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to toe appointed nearinc. 



Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before thai 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting my a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5. 1986) (Emphasis added; 



REQUESTS FOR REHEARING 
Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a decision 
and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and 
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be made by the Board 
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a 
written request stating succinctly the grounds upon which such rehearing is requested 
(b) If .new evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show 
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a 
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at 
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the 
previous hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations for 
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the 
Board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is 
considered by the Board. 

Robert H Felriman City and Count 3' of San Francisco 

Executive Director B0ARD 0F PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 554-6720 Roo[r ' 15Z, -A, City Hall 

^ a r, ri-;nricrn fal i fnrni = Q /i 1 fl *> 



tm.-'fMS' 






'<**<>-.»*•**„*,, 







-7f 



Z0Tfr6 VO 'OOSIDUBJj UBC 

V-WI ujooh - lien Am 

smw iiiRiid jo om 






MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 
WEDNESDAY, JULY 15, 1987 
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 



DOCUMENTS DEPT. 

JUL 151987 

SAN FRANCISCO 
PUBLIC LIBRARY 



MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 



APPEAL NO. 87-117 



18TH 



AVENUE RESIDENTIAL COALITION, Appellants 
vs . 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[ Protesting issuance on May 1 , 
to Edwin Lum, permit to Erect 
Structure at 148-18th Avenue. 
APPLICATION NO. 8604857. 
FOR REHEARING TODAY. 



APPEAL NO. 87-138 



CLARA ANDERSON, Appellant 

vs . 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 

APPEAL NO. 87-145 
YASHIMA CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., YAN YAN CHU, 
AND TOP DEVELOPMENT, Appellants 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 

APPEAL NO. 87-146 
YASHIMA CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., YAN YAN CHU, 
AND TOP DEVELOPMENT, Appellants 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 

APPEAL NO. 87-133 



DAVID A. GROSS & NEIGHBORS, Appellants 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
DAHI APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 87-134 



FRANK L. BURRELL, JR., Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



MICHAEL C. BECKER, Appellant 
vs. 

I DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 87-135 



APPEAL NO. 87-150 



SAN FRANCISCO BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION, 
TRADES COUNCIL, Appellants 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 87-151 



EILEEN C. HENRIQUES, Appellant 
vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



HENRY NIEDEMS, Appellant 
0/ vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 87-156 



1987 

a 



(5/22) 



Protesting issuance on May 
John Chan, permit to Alter 
at 22 Tulane Street. 
APPLICATION NO. 8705565. 
FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 



29, 1987, to 
a Building 



(7/15) 



Revocation on June 3, 1987, of permit 

to Erect a Structure at 250-1 9th 

Avenue. 

APPLICATION NO. 8605647. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/22) 

Revocation on June 3, 1987, of permit 

to Erect a Structure at 251-1 8th 

Avenue. 

APPLICATION NO. 8604648. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/22) 

Protesting issuance on May 19, 1987, 
to Kevin Webb, permit to Alter a 
Building at 3524-22nd Street. 
APPLICATION NO. 8700486 
FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/7) 

Protesting issuance on May 22, 1987, 
to Cheryl Carson, permit to Alter a 
Building at 2502 Broadway Street. 
APPLICATION NO. 8705212. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/8) 

Protesting issuance on May 21, 1987, 
to Henry Domeniconi, permit to Alter 
a Building at 1 580-1 5th Avenue. 
APPLICATION NO. 8614024. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/8) 

Protesting issuance on June 11, 1987, 
to Gene & Helen Ng, permit to Erect a 
Structure at 590-25th Avenue. 
APPLICATION NO. 8616278. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/29) 

Protesting issuance on June 16, 1987, 
to Peter L. Richen, permit to Alter 
a Building at 1929 Ellis Street. 
APPLICATION NO. 8704175. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/1) 

Protesting issuance on June 15, 1987, 
to Kung Chi u Leung, permit to Alter 
a Building at 1834-33rd Avenue. 
APPLICATION NO. 8704437. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/4) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, JULY 15, 1987 PAGE TWO 

APPEAL NO. 87-158 
EDITH CHAN, Appellant "[^Protesting issuance on June 15, 

vs. [1987, to Kung Chiu Leung, permit 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [to Alter a Building at 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [1834 - 33rd Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8704437. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. [8/4) 

APPEAL NO. 87-154 
JACK SIGESMUND & PENNY ALTON, Appellants [Protesting issuance on June 18, 

vs. [1987, to Cornelius and Sara Haskell, 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [permit to Alter a Building at 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [2445 Buchanan Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8613989. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY, (8/2) 

APPEAL NO. V87-149 
JOSEPH HARRIS, Appellant [Denial on June 9, 1987, of Front 

vs. [Setback Variance sought for 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [property at 2865 Clay Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/27) 

APPEAL NO. V87-153 
D. EDWIN SMALLE, Appellant [Denial on June 10, 1987, of 

vs. [Rear Yard and Exposure of a Dwelling 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [Unit Variance sought for property 

[at 2550 California Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/1) 

PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to two minutes for each speaker. 






MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

DOUGLAS J, ENGMANN VICE PRESIDENT 

MATTIE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

JOSE E. MEDINA COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing. 



The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING 
Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a decision 
and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and 
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be made by the Board 
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a 
written request stating succinctly the grounds upon which such rehearing is requested, 
(b) If new evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show: 
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a 
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at 
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the 
previous hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations for 
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the 
Board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is 
considered by the Board. 



Robert H. Feldman 
Executive Director 
(415) 554-6720 



City and County of San Francisco 

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

Room 154-A, City Hall 

San Francisco, California 94102 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

City Hall - Room 154-A 
San Francisco, CA 94102 




CITY LIBRARIAN 
Public Library 






5P 

50 



S- CLtf-<i~d- A ' 



-6F 

MEETING OF THE BOARD Or PERMIT APPEALS 
WEDNESDAY /^JULY 8, 1987 
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 



DOCUMENTS DEPT. 

JUL t 188/ 

SAN FRANCISCO 
PUBLIC LIBRAPV 



ATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REOUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 

TEM NC. 1 Letter from Richard A. Lygutis, Esq., requesting the Board to take jurisdiction 
ver the decisions of the Police Commission which Mr. Lygutis states failed to withdraw 
ertain Corporate taxi permits. 

TEK NO. 2 Letter from Nicholas Jardine requesting the Board to grant a rehearing of 
ippeal No. V87-125 . The appellant had protested the denial of a variance for property at 
>69 Hayes Street. On June 17, 1987, the Board, upon motion of Commissioner Fung, voted 
-2 to overrule the department and grant the variance. Commissioners Engmann and Medina 
iissenting. The appellant offers a modification of plans to satisfy neighbors. 

TEM NO. 3 Letter from the 18th Avenue Residential Coalition requesting that the Board 

irant a rehearing of Appeal No. 87-117 . The appellants had protested the issuance of a 

•ermit to erect a structure at 148-18th Avenue. On June 10, 1987, the Board voted 3-1, 

ice President Engmann dissenting, to uphold the department and grant the permit. Commissioner 

lackson was absent. This matter continued from the July 1, 1987, addendum. 



APPEAL NO. 87-144 
MICHAEL ROGER, ake "NICHOLAS QUIRARTT? 

Appellant 
vs. 
ARTS COMMISSION, Respondent 



?) 



[Revocation on June 2, 1987, of Street 
[Artist Certificate No. 2044 near 
[Fishermans Wharf. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/22) 



APPEAL NO. 87-096 



DANIEL RASKIN, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



MYRA PAK, Appellant 
A vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



THE TENANTS, Appellant 
B vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



CLARA ANDERSON, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



NANCY MUSSER, Appellant 
6) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



T Protesting issuance on April 9, 1987, 
[to Paul & Sandra Schwartz, permit to 
[Erect a Structure at 30 Bonview Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8701808. 
[FOR REHEARING TODAY. (5/24) 



APPEAL NO. 87-118 



[Protesting issuance on May 6, 1987, 

[to Butch Swanson, permit to Erect 

[a Structure at 1906-20th Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8606136. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/23) 



APPEAL NO. 87-127 



APPEAL NO. 87-138 



[Protesting issuance on May 6, 1987, 
[to Butch Swanson, permit to Erect a 
[Structure at 1906-20th Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8606136. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/27) 

\ 

"[Protesting issuance on May 29, 1987, to 

[John Chan, permit to Alter a Building 

[at 22 Tulane Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8705565. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/15) 



APPEAL NO. 87-140 



[Protesting issuance on May 29, 1987, to 
[Sok-Sony & My Hoa Tang, permit to 
[Alter a Building at 1769 Lombard Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8704142. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/18) 



APPEAL NO. 87-142 



EDA REPETTO, Appellant 
vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



TProtesting issuance on June 2, 1987, 
[to Roosevelt Chung, permit to Alter a 
[Building at 1720 Greenwich Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8708909. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/21) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, JULY 8, 1987 PAGE TWO 

APPEAL NO. V87-1A3 
MANUEL PEREZ, Appellant ["Denial on June 3, 1987, of Minimum Lot 

vs. [Width & Minimum Lot Size Variances 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [sought for property at 35B5 Folsorr 

[Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/20) 

APPEAL NO. 87-143 
CHRISTOPHER & CELESTE E. MAY, Appellants [Determination by the Zoning Administrator 

vs. [that the Authorized Use of the property 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [is as 4 Dwelling Units only at 527-531 

[Broderick Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8608592. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/22) 

3 PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to two minutes for each speaker. 



member: of the board of permit appeals 

jerry e, berg president 

douglas j. engmann vice president 

mattie j. jackson commissioner 

frank s. fung commissioner 

jose e. medina commissioner 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing . 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING 
Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a decision 
and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and 
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be made by the Board 
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a 
written request stating succinctly the grounds upon which such rehearing is requested, 
(b) If new evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show: 
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a 
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at 
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the 
previous hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations for 
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the 
Board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is 
considered by the Board. 



Robert H Feldman Cit ^ and Count y of San Francisco 

Executive Director B0ARD 0F PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 554-6720 Room 154 ~ A > Cn y Hal1 

San Francisco, California 94102 






1 ^ 




Z0T176 VO 'oosjoubjj ubs 

V-frSI wooy - ||bh Ai!0 

$TO3ddVM3d JO QW08 



F 

2 

12/^7 



c - 8f 

meeting of the board of permit appeals 

Wednesday: august 12, 198 7 

5:00 p.m., room 282, city hall 



DOCUMENTS PE£T. 

SAN FRANCISCO 
P «'BUC UBPadv 



KTTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE. 

I EM A Letter from Louis H. Minkin requesting the Board to take jurisdiction beyond the 

T-day appeal period over a building permit issued to demolish a building at 2924 Clement 
Sreet. 

Permit issued July 24, 1987 



Appeal period ended 

Request for jurisdiction received 



August 3, 1987 
August 5, 1987 



APPEAL NO. 87- 177 
CIAPI LELEUX, dba "SUKY'S SPA," AppeTTant 

vs. 
FLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 

APPEAL NO. 87- 136 
TIN PEAKS EAST NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATTUN"; 

Appellant 
vs. 
CPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CTY PLANNING APPROVAL 



T Denial on July 10, 1987, of Massage 
[Establishment & Outcall Massage 
[Service permit at 136 Mason Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/26) 



T Protesting issuance on May 21, 1987, 
[to Tom Louie, permit to Alter a 
[Building at 131 Corbett Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8700199. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (7/11) 



APPEAL NO. 86-369 



HNDLERY HOTELS, Ttopell ant 

vs. / 
DPT. PUBLIC WORKS, RespjQ : 
CTY PLANNING DI$APPF 
DHI DISAPPROVAL 




T Denial on December^ 9 , 1987, of 
[permit to Alter a Building at 
[245 Powell Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 85085* 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 




(2/24) 



APPEAL NO. 87-172 



rCHEL P. BERLINE, Appellant 

vs. 
DPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
FRE DEPARTMENT DISAPPROVAL 

APPEAL NO 
SN FRANCISCO BUILDING AND CONSTRUCT^ 
1ADES COUNCIL, Appellants 

vs. 
DPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CTY PLANNING APPROVAL 



T Denial on July 7, 1987, of 
[permit to Alter a Building at 
[601 Minnesota Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8709854. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(8/24) 



87-150 



T Protesting issuance on June 11, 1987, 
[to Gene & Helen Ng, permit to Erect 
[Structure at 590-25th Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8616278. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/29) 



SN FRANCISCO BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTIVE" 
1ADES COUNCIL, Appellant 

vs. 
EPT. -PUBLIC WORKS. Respondent 
CTY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 87-167 



T Protesting issuance on June 24, 1987, 
[to Sureshi Gandhi , permit to Erect 
[a Structure at 1500 Noriega Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8700517 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/15) 



*Y T. WOO, Appellant 

vs. 
IPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CTY PLANNING APPROVAL 



I0RENCE MEEHAN BURKE, Appellant 

vs. 
IPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
(TY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 87-163 



T Protesting issuance on June 22, 1987, 

[Craig & Yuko Franklin, permit, to 

[Alter a Building at 240 Dellbrook 

[Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8706149. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/11) 



APPEAL NO. 87-165 



[Protesting issuance on June 24, 1987, 
[to Thomas & Sheila Clyatt, permit to 
[Alter a Building at 3942-20th Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8704887. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/12) 



METING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, AUGUST 12, 1987 PAGE TWO 

APPEAL NO. 87-173 
I. B. TAD SAVIO, Appellant ["Protesting issuance on July 6, 1987, 

vs. [to the Association for Retarded 

UPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Citizens, permit to Alter a Building 

ITY PLANNING APPROVAL [at 1 Amethyst. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8707526. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/24) 

APPEAL NO. 87-175 
USTER W. AND KATHERINE WONG, Appellants [Protesting issuance on July 7, 1987, 

vs. [to Frank and Maureen Cafferkey, 

tIPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [permit to Demolish a Building at 

CTY PLANNING APPROVAL [647-22nd Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8614985. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/26) 

APPEAL NO. 87-176 



TSTER W. AND KATHERINE WONG, Appellents " [Protesting issuance on July 7, 1987, 

vs. [to Frank and Maureen Cafferkey, 

r:PT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [permit to Erect a Structure at 

|:TY PLANNING APPROVAL [647-22nd Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8616107. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/26) 

APPEAL NO. 87-179 
,".AN C. ESPEY, Appellant TProtesting issuance on July 9, 1987, 

vs. [to Richard Cheung, permit to Alter 

KPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [a Building at 467-35th Avenue. 

TTY PLANNING APPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8610878. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/29) 

APPEAL NO. V87-166 
itCUS, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, Appellant TDenial on July 1, 1987, of Off-Street 

vs. [Parking Variance, for property at 

DNING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [at 2031-2033 Hayes Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/22) 

)MJBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to two minutes for each speaker. 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN VICE PRESIDENT 

MATTIE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

JOSE E. MEDINA COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing . 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING 
Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a decision 
and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and 
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be made by the Board 
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a 
written request stating succinctly the grounds upon which such rehearing is requested, 
(b) If new evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show: 
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a 
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at 
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the 
previous hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations for 
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the 
Board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is 
considered by the Board. 



Robert H Feldman City and Count y of San Francisco 

Executive Director B0ARD 0F PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 554-6720 Room 154 " A » Ci *y Ha1 "l 

San Francisco, California 94102 






' Sc 4 GA S4J02 




Public Library 



£ / DOCUMENTS DEPT. 

« 2 MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS SEP 3 1987 

WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 2, 1987 San franc.sco 
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL PUBU ° U 

) MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 

ITEM NO. A Letter from Mrs. Lester Wong requesting the Board to rehear Appeal No. 87-175. 
The appellant had protested the issuance of a permit to demolish a building at 647-22nd 
Avenue. On August 12, 1987, the Board, upon motion of Vice President Engmann, voted 
1-3 to overrule the Department and revoke the permit. Four votes needed to overrule, the 
Board is upheld and the permit granted. 

ITEM NO. B Letter from Tad Savio, requesting the Board to grant a rehearing of Appeal 
No. 87-173" . The appellant had appealed the issuance of a permit to Alter a Building 
at 1 Amethyst Way. On August 12, 1987, upon motion of Vice President Engmann, the Board 
voted 4-0 to uphold the Department and grant the permit. 

APPEAL NO. 87-212 



MARKB0R0UGH CALIFORNIA PROPERTIES, INC. [Determination on July 22, 1987, 

Appellant [concerning the Appeal Process under 

) vs. [Section 322 of the Planning Code. 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (9/9) 

APPEAL NO. 87-180 



RICHARD & REGINA PLUT, Appellants TProtesting issuance on July 15, 1987, 

) vs. [to Dr. Johnson, permit to Alter a 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Building at 566 Kansas Street 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8704654. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/29) 

APPEAL NO. 87-181 

ANTON JOHANN MUZIK AND GERALDYNE [Protesting issuance on July 9, 

WILKIN, Appellants [1987, to William Turner, permit 

) vs. [to demolish a building at 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [54 Bret Harte Terrace. 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8701645. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/29) 

THE FOLLOWING APPEALS SHALL BE CONSIDERED TOGETHER, WITH PRESENTATIONS BY APPELLANTS, 
RESPONDENTS, PERMIT HOLDERS AND THE PUBLIC IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ATTACHED "ORDER OF 
PRESENTATION" 

APPEAL NO. 87-182 
DERINGER DEVELOPMENT GROUP, Appellants [Denial on July 9, 1987, of 

\) vs. [Project Authorization and Site 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Permit at 1601 Mission Street. 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8500453S. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/29) 

APPEAL NO. 87-183 
DERINGER DEVELOPMENT GROUP, Appellants [Protesting issuance on July 9, 

B) vs. [1987, -to Federal Home Loan Bank, 
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, Respondent [Project Authorization and Section 

[309 Determinations for 
[600 California Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/29) 

APPEAL NO. 87-184 
DERINGER DEVELOPMENT GROUP, Appellants [Protesting issuance on July 9, 

C) vs. [1987, to 343 Sansome Ventures, 
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, Respondent [Project Authorization and Section 

[309 Determinations for 

I [343 Sansome Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/29) 

APPEAL NO. 87-185 
DERINGER DEVELOPMENT GROUP, Appellants [Protesting issuance on July 9, 

D) vs . [1987, to London & Edinbergh Trust, 
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, Respondent [Project Authorization and Section 

[309 Determinations for 

[235 Pine Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/29) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, SEPTEMBER 2, 1987 



PAGE TWO 



APPEAL NO. 87-186 



MARKBOROUGH CALIFORNIA PROPERTIES, 

Appellants 
vs. 
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, Respondent 



[Denial on July 9, 1987, of 
[Project Authorization and Site 
[Permit for construction at 
[101 Second Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8508909S. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(8/29) 



APPEAL NO. 87-187 



MARKBOROUGH CALIFORNIA PROPERTIES, 

Appellants 
vs. 
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, Respondent 



T Protesting issuance on July 9, 

[1987, to 343 Sansome Ventures, 

[Project Authorization and Section 

[309 Determinations for 

[343 Sansome Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/29) 



APPEAL NO. 87-188 



MARKBOROUGH CALIFORNIA PROPERTIES, 

Appellants 
vs. 
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, Respondent 



TProtesting issuance on July 9, 
[1987, to London & Edinburgh Trust, 
[Project Authorization and Section 
[309 Determinations for 
[235 Pine Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/29) 



APPEAL NO. 87-189 



MARKBOROUGH CALIFORNIA PROPERTIES, 

Appellants 
vs. 
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, Respondent 



TProtesting issuance on July 9, 

[1987, to Federal Home Loan Bank, 

[Project Authorization and Section 

[309 Determinations for 

[600 California Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/29) 



APPEAL NO. 87-190 



650 CALIFORNIA STREET ASSOCIATES, 

Appellants 
vs . 
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, Respondent 



TProtesting issuance on July 9, 
[1987, to Federal Home Loan Bank, 
[Project Authorization and Section 
[309 Determinations for 
[600 California Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY, (8/29) 



PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to two minutes for each speaker. 



MFMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN VICE PRESIDENT 

MATT IE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

JOSE E. MEDINA COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

i 

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 | 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 

the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken ' 

shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 

Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 

circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed ' 

fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less , if more time is , 

deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the ' 

Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing . , 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. ' 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them ' 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

i 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING 
Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a decision 
and may be filed only by principals 1n the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and 
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall hot be made by the Board 
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a 
written request stating succinctly the grounds upon which such rehearing is requested, 
(b) If new evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show: 
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a 
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at 
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence- at the 
previous hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations fop 
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the 
Board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is 
considered by the Board. 



Robert H Feldman City and Countv of San Francisco 

Executive Director B0ARD 0F PERMIT APFEALS 

(415) 554-6720 Room 154 " A » C1 *y Hal1 

San Francisco, California 94102 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 



REVISED ORDER OF PRESENTATION FOR APPEALS OF FIVE MAJOR BUILDINGS 



UNDER PLANNING CODE 



I 2, 1987: A. 
B. 



1601/1641 Mission Street 
600 California Street 

343 Sansome Street 

235 Pine Street 

101 Second Street 



Introduction by Planning staff (20 minutes maximum; 

Description of five proposed buildings by project sponsors: 

1. Deringer Development Group 

2. Federal Home Loan Bank 

3. 343 Sansome Ventures 

4. London & Edinburgh Trust 

5. Markborough California Properties 
Arguments for and against Planning Commission decisions 
Appellant: Deringer Development Group 
Appellant: Markborough California Properties 
Appellant: 650 California Street Associates 
Project Authorization Holder: Federal Home Loan Bank 
Project Authorization Holder: 343 Sansome Ventures 
Project Authorization Holder: London & Edinburgh Trust 



20 min. max.] 
20 min. max.] 

20 min. max.] 

20 min. max.] 

20 min. max.] 

15 min. max.] 
15 min. max.] 
10 min. max.] 
15 min. max.] 
15 min. max.] 
15 min. max.] 



D. 
E. 



Public comments 
Questions by Commissioners 



(2 minutes maximum for each speaker) 



)l 23, 1987: 
)t 30, 1987: 



Any additional written submissions shall be delivered to the Board members 
and other parties by September 16, 1987. 

Further discussion and questions by Commissioners. Vote. 

Adoption of Findings. 



Revised 8/27/87 
022 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

City Hall - Room 154-A 
San Francisco, CA 94102 




' C ¥&h~ bifi'RAR I AM"" 
Public Library 



H*7 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF j>ERNIT APPEALS 

WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 26. 1987 

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282. CITY HALL 



AUG 2 5 19bf 
! ;l:-.i, 



MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 

ITEM NO. A Letter from James F. Peterson, Esq., on behalf of Yashlma Construction 
Company requesting the Board to grant a rehearing of Appeal No. 87-145. The appellant 
had appealed the revocation of a permit to Erect a Structure at 250-19th Avenue. On 
July 15, 1987, the Board, upon motion of Commissioner Fung, voted 3-2 to overrule the 
Department and grant the permit. The Department was upheld and the revocation sustained. 

ITEM NO. B Letter from James F. Peterson, Esq., on behalf of Yashima Construction 
Company requesting the Board to grant a rehearing of Appeal No. 87-146. The appellant 
had appealed the revocation of permit to Erect a Structure at 251-18th Avenue. On 
July 15, 1987, the Board, upon motion of Commissioner Fung, voted 3-2 to overrule the 
Department and grant the permit. The Department was upheld and the revocation sustained. 

ITEM NO. C Letter from Calvin Li, Stephen Kendrick (Broadway Tunnel Park Committee) 
requesting the Board to grant a rehearing of Appeal No. V87-169. The appellants had 
appealed the granting of a variance for property at Broadway and Mason Streets. On 
August 5, 1987, upon motion of Commissioner Fung, the Board voted 4-0 to uphold the 
Department and grant the variance. 

ITEM NO. D Letter from Christopher C. Hall, Esq., on behalf of Tina Souders and George 
Coles, requesting the Board to take jurisdiction beyond the 10-day appeal period over 
revocation of Outcall Massage permit at 1000 Silver Avenue. 



Permit revoked 

Appeal period ended 

Request for jurisdiction received 



June 16, 1987 
June 26, 1987 
August 19, 1987 



JEAN C. ESPEY, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



EDMUND L. JUNG, Appellant 

vs. 
POLICE COMMISSION, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 87-179 



[Protesting issuance on July 9, 1987, 
[to Richard Cheung, permit to Alter 
[a Building at 467-35th Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 861087B. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (8/29) 

APPEALS NOS. 87-198, 87-199 & 87-200 

[Revocation by the San Francisco 

[Police Commission (Motion No. 825-87) 

[on July 17, 1987, of three Motorized 

[Rickshaw permits, issued to Edmund L. 

[Jung. 

[MR-1, MR-2 & MR- 3. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/2) 



WILLIAM POWERS, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
DAHI DISAPPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 86-223 



[Denial on August 22, 1986, of permit 

[to Alter a Building at 2375-2377 

[Francisco Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8606123. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (10/7) 



APPEAL NO. 87-192 



5) 



BOB MC C0RMICK, ROBERT GUICHARD, J. ALFRED 
RIDER & DEAN L. RIDER, Appellants 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on July 14, 1987, 

[to the City of San Francisco, permit 

[to Demolish a Building at 701 Frederick 

[Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8704303. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/30) 



APPEAL NO. 87-193 



(5) 



BOB MC C0RMICK, ROBERT GUICHARD, J. ALFRED 
RIDER & DEAN L. RIDER, Appellants 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on July 14, 1987, 

[to the City of San Francisco, permit 

[to Demolish a Building at 701 Frederick 

[Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8704304. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/30) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, AUGUST 26, 1987, 



PAGE TWO 



APPEAL NO. 87-194 



BOB MC CORMICK, ROBERT GUICHARD, J. ALFRED 
RIDER & DEAN RIDER, Appellants 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on July 14, 1987, 

[to the City of San Francisco, 

[permit to Demolish a Building at 

[701 Frederick Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8704305. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/30) 



APPEAL NO. 87-195 



KEZAR POLY NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, Appellants 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on July 14, 1987, 

[to the City of San Francisco, permit 

[to Demolish a Building at 701 

[Frederick Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8704304. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/31) 



APPEAL NO. 87-202 



PRASZKER FAMILY TRUST, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on July 17, 1987, 

[to Jukebox Saturday Night, Inc., 

[permit to Alter a Building at 

[650 Howard Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8707963. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/5) 



APPEAL NO. 87-203 



OLGA W. NORKUS, Appellant 

vs 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



CATHERINE WHITCOMB, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



1987 



[Protesting issuance on July 16, 
[to Kyu Lee, permit to Alter a 
[Building at 523-40th Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8700371. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/5) 



APPEAL NO. 87-205 



[Protesting issuance on July 23, 1987, 

[to Bank of Canton of California, 

[permit to Alter a Building at 

[289-9th Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8311396. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/7) 



APPEAL NO. 87-162 



SHARON LEE, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



ERNEST TAYLOR, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



[Denial on June 24,1987, of permit 

[to Alter a Building at 1750 Grant 

[Avenue, 

[APPLICATION NO. 8609524. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/9) 



APPEAL NO. V87-196 



[Denial on July 13, 1987, of Off- 
[Street Parking Variance sought 
[for property at 1670 Oakdale Avenue. 
[VARIANCE CASE NO. 87.326V. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/31) 



APPEAL NO. V87-197 



GEORGE JEONG, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



[Denial on July 13, 1987, of Off- 

[Street Parking Variance sought 

[for property at 2900 Franklin Street, 

[VARIANCE CASE NO. 87.318V. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/31) 



APPEAL NO. 87-207 



DOMINIC YAM, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 

APPEAL NO. 87-212 
MARKBOROUGH CALIFORNIA PROPERTIES, INC. 

vs. Appellant 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



[Order to Cease Violation of the 
[Planning Code dated July 21, 1987, 
[for property at 2900 Franklin Street, 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/9) 



Determination on July 22, 1987, 

concerning the Appeal Process under 
Section 322 of the Planning Code. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/9) 



PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to two minutes for each speaker, 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 



JERRY E, BERG 
DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN 
MATT IE J. JACKSON 
FRANK S. FUNG 
JOSE E. MEDINA 



PRESIDENT 

VICE PRESIDENT 

COMMISSIONER 

COMMISSIONER 

COMMISSIONER 



. DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing . 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING 
Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a decision 
and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and 
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be made by the Board 
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a 
written request stating succinctly the grounds upon which such rehearing is requested, 
(b) If new evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show: 
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a 
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at 
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the 
previous hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations for 
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the 
Board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is 
considered by the Board. 



Robert H. Feldman 
Executive Director 
(415) 554-6720 



City and County of San Francisco 

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

Room 154-A, City Hall 

San Francisco, California 94102 



BOm OF PQUliT AP p£^ 
*an Francisco, CA 94102 



Public Library 




^CtZx 



[SF7 x//}£EMi>A] 



^ 



U1 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER^16, 1 987 
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282/tITY HALL 



DOCUMENTS DE?T. 

SAN FRANCISCO 
PUBLIC LIBRARY 



L| MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 

ITEM NO. A Consideration of designation of a Board representative or committee to make 
■visits to project sites or architects' offices for Appeals 87-182 to 87-190, the office 
competition projects located at 1601 Mission, 600 California, 343 Sansome, 235 Pine and 101 
Second Streets. The public hearing on these cases was held September 2, 1987, and the matter 
! was continued to September 23, 1987. 

ITEM NO. B Letter from Ms. Jean C. Espey requesting the Board to rehear Appeal No. 87-179 

The appellant had protested the issuance of a permit to Alter a Buidling at 467-35th 

Avenue. On August 26, 1987, upon motion of Commissioner Fung, the Board voted 5-0 to 
uphold the Department and grant the permit subject to conditions. 

ITEM NO. C Letter from Mr. Michael Praszker requesting the Board to rehear Appeal No. 87-202. 
1 he appellant had protested the issuance of a permit to Alter a Building at 650 Howard Street. 
On August 26, 1987, upon motion of Vice President Engmann, the Board voted 5-0 to uphold the 
Department and grant the permit subject to conditions. 

ITEM NO. D Letter from Steven A. Diaz, Esq., on behalf of Edmund L. Jung requesting a 
renearing of Appeal Nos. 87-198, 87-199, and 87-200. Mr. Jung had appealed the revocation 
of three motorized rickshaw permits. On August 26, 1987, upon motion of President Berg, 
the Board voted 2-3 to uphold the Department and revoke the permits (Commissioners Jackson, 
liFung and Medina voting to overrule the Department). 

ITEM NO. E Letter from Edward A. Koplowitz, Esq., on behalf of Mr. Bob McCormick, requesting 
a rehearing of Appeal Nos. 87-192, 87-193, and 87-194. The appellant had protested the 
issuance of demolition permits for structures at 701 Frederick Street. On August 26, 1987, 
lupon motion of President Berg, the Board voted 4-0 to uphold the Department and grant the 
permits. (Vice-President Engmann did not hear this appeal.) 

ITEM NO. F Letter from Kezar Poly Neighborhood Association requesting rehearing of Appeal 
No. 87-195. The appellants had protested the issuance of a permit to demolish a building 
at 701 Frederick Street. On August 26, 1987, upon motion of President Berg, the Board voted 
4-0 to uphold the Department and grant the permit. (Vice-President Engmann did not hear this 

appeal . ) 

ITEM NO. G Letter from Gordon Lau, Esq., on behalf of Mr. Dominic Yam, requesting a 
rehearing of Appeal No. 87-207. Mr. Yam had appealed the Zoning Administrator's Order to 
Cease Violation of the Planning Code for property at 2900 Franklin Street. On August 26, 1987, 
upon motion of President Berg, the Board voted 5-0 to uphold the Zoning Administrator's order. 

ITEM NO. H Letter from Gordon Lau, Esq., on behalf of Mr. George Jeong, requesting a 
rehearing of Appeal No. V87-197. The appellant had appealed the decision of the Zoning 
Administrator denying a Variance for property at 2900 Franklin Street. On August 26, 1987, 
upon motion of President Berg, the Board voted 5-0 to uphold the Zoning Administrator and 
deny the Variance 



APPEAL NO. 87-220 



I0SEIN F. EIKANI, Appellant 

vs. 
)EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



1ARGARET T. CONNOR, Appellant 

vs. 
)EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



T Imposition of Penalty on August 6, 1987, 
[for work done at 110-112 6th Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8708369. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/17) 



APPEAL NO. 87-228 



T Imposition of Penalty on August 17, 1987 
[for work done at 33 Alta Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8701975. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/26) 



APPEAL NO. 87-157 
JEANNIE WESTALL dba "ORIENTAL HEALTH SPAT" 
vs. Appellant 

>0LICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



[Denial on June 15, 1987, of Massage 

[Establishment permit at 461 Bush 

[Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/5) 



APPEAL NO. 87-217 







)ENISE M. WILLIAMS, Appellant 

vs. 
>0LICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



TDenial on July 29, 1987, of Masseuse 
[permit at 403 Broadway Street, dba, 
["Tiffani's Massage." 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/15) 



5) 



APPEAL NO. 87-218 



IDGARDO VIDES, dba, "EL Z0CAL0 RESTAURANT," 

Appellant 
vs. 
>0LICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



TDenial on July 29, 1987, of Cabaret 
[permit for 3230 Mission Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/15) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, SEPTEMBER 16, 1987, 



PAGE TWO 



APPEAL NO. 87-219 



FLOR D. MARTINEZ, dba, "LOS PANCHOS RESTAURANT," 

Appellant 
vs . 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



T Denial on July 31, 1987, of Cabaret 

[permit for 3206 Mission Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/16) 



APPEAL NO. 87-222 



VAN CAM VO, dba "HONG KONG MASSAGE," 

Appellant 
vs . 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 

MARK RENNIE, dba "CLUB 9." Appellant 

vs. 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



DAVID HOWARD, Appellant 
0) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



DANIEL FONG, Appellant 
ID vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



ELIZABETH B. BOILEAU, Appellant 
12) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Appellant 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



JIM ILNICKI, Appellant 
3) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



TRevocation on July 31, 1987, of 
[Massage Establishment permit at 
[450-B Jones Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(9/20) 



APPEAL NO. 87-223 



TRevocation on July 31, 1987, of 
[Dance Hall Keeper, Place of 
[Entertainment and Cabaret permits at 
[399-9th Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/20) 



APPEAL NO. 87-115 



T Denial on April 27, 1987, of permit 
[to Alter a Building at 405 Clayton 
[Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8511545. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (6/16) 



APPEAL NO. 87-152 



T Denial on June 22, 1987, of permit 
[to Alter a Building at 2010 Vallejo 
[Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8609925. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/1) 



APPEAL NO. 87-226 



TProtesting issuance on August 4, 1987, 
[to Michael Moran, permit to Demolish 
[a Building at 568 Mississippi Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8706640. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/23) 



APPEAL NO. 87-227 



TProtesting issuance on August 7, 1987, 
[to Jose Murrillo, permit to Erect a 
[Structure at 220 Peralta Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8504983. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/23) 



APPEAL NO. 87-221 



VILO PROPERTIES-C/0 V. HONIG, Appellant 
4) vs. 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



TOrder to Cease Violation of the 
[Planning Code dated July 29, 1987, 
[for property at 1513 Mission Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/20) 



5) PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to two minutes for each speaker. 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 



JERRY E. BERG 
DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN 
MATT IE J. JACKSON 
FRANK S. FUNG 
JOSE E. MEDINA 



PRESIDENT 

VICE PRESIDENT 

COMMISSIONER 

COMMISSIONER 



COMMISSIONER 
DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing . 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING 
Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a decision 
and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and 
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall hot be made by the Board 
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a 
written request stating succinctly the grounds upon which such rehearing is requested, 
(b) If new evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show: 
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a 
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at 
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence- at the 
previous hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations for 
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the 
Board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is 
considered by the Board. 



Robert H. Feldman 
Executive Director 
(415) 554-6720 



City and County of San Francisco 

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

Room 154-A, City Hall 

San Francisco, California 94102 



&" Francisco, CA S41Q2 



CITY LIBRARIAN 
Public Library 






<4L 



(L 



■c 



ME -ITING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 
WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 25, 1987 
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 



DOCUMENTS DEPT. 

SEP 2 2 198? 

SAN FRANCISCO 
PUBLIC UBRApv 



) MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 

NO. A Letter from Timothy Tosta, Esq., requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 87-212. 
The appellant had appealed a Determination by the Zoning Administrator concerning the 
Appeal process under Section 322 of the Planning Code. On September 2, 1987, upon motion 
of President Berg, the Board voted 4-0 to sustain the Determination. (Vice President 
Engmann was absent.) 

NO. B Letter from Dr. Willard Johnson and Judy I. Johnson requesting the Board to rehear 
Appeal No. 87-180. The appellant had protested the issuance of a permit to alter a building 
at 566 Kansas Street. On September 2, 1987, upon motion of Commissioner Fung, the Board 
voted 4-0 to uphold the Department and grant the permit subject to conditions. (Vice President 
Engmann was absent.) Dr. Johnson requests that the conditions imposed by the Board be deleted. 



THE Office Competition Appeals 
together. 



No. 87-182 through 87-190 (Items 2 through 6) will be heard 



APPEAL NO. 87-182 



DERINGER DEVELOPMENT GROUP, Appellants 
) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 87-183 



DERINGER DEVELOPMENT GROUP, Appellants 
vs. 

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 87-189 



MARKBOROUGH CALIFORNIA PROPERTIES, 

Appellants 
:) vs. 

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 87-190 



650 CALIFORNIA STREET ASSOCIATES, 

Appellants 
:) vs. 

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 87-184 



DERINGER DEVELOPMENT GROUP, Appellants 
vs. 

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 87-18 



MARKBOROUGH CALIFORNIA PROPERTIES, 

Appellants 
) vs. 

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, Respondent 

APPEAL NO 
DERINGER DEVELOPMENT GROUP, Appellants 

) vs. 

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, Respondent 



87-185 



Denial on July 9, 1987, of 
Project Authorization and Site 
Permit at 1601 Mission Street. 
APPLICATION NO. 8500453S. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(8/29) 



Protesting issuance on July 9, 

1987, to Federal Home Loan Bank, 

Project Authorization and Section 

309 Determinations for 600 California 

Street. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/29) 

Protesting issuance on July 9, 1987, 

to Federal Home Loan Bank, 

Project Authorization and Section 

309 Determinations for 600 California 

California Street. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/29) 



Protesting issuance on July 9, 1987, 

to Federal Home Loan Bank, 

Project Authorization and Section 

309 Determinations for 

600 California Street. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/29) 



Protesting issuance on July 9, 1987, 
to 343 Sansome Ventures, Project 
Authorization and Section 309 
Determinations for 343 Sansome Street. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/29) 



Protesting issuance on July 9, 1987, 
to 343 Sansome Ventures, Project 
Authorization and Section 309 
Determinations for 343 Sansome Street. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/29) 



Protesting issuance on July 9, 1987, 
to London & Edinbergh Trust, Project 
Authorization and Section 309 
Determinations for 235 Pine Street. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/29) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, SEPTEMBER 23, 1987, 



PAGE TWO 



APPEAL NO. 87-188 



MARKBOROUGH CALIFORNIA PROPERTIES, 

Appellants 
5) vs. 

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, Respondent 



MARKBOROUGH CALIFORNIA PROPERTIES, 

vs. 
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, Respondent 



GORDON REALTY COMPANY, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



DAVE RAWSON, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



LTD PARTNERS, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 
DAHI DISAPPROVAL 

HENRY HOPKINS, Appellant 
) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 

PAUL SCHWARTZ, Appellant 
) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



EUGENE J. MITCHELL, Appellant 
) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Responent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 87-186 



APPEAL NO. 87-01 



APPEAL NO. 87-17 



APPEAL NO. 87-21 



APPEAL NO. 87-214 



APPEAL NO. 87-230 



APPEAL NO. 87-209 



APPEAL NO. 87-248 



ALLAN J. /JOSEPH AND PHYLLIS/P. JOSEPH, 

vs. 
i)DEPT. Pl/BLIC WORKS, Respor/dent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 




APPEAL NO. 87-206 



D. ROBERT LAWRENCE, Appellant 
) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



MARY R. LEWIS, Appellant 
) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 87-21 



Protesting issuance on July 9, 1987, 
to London & Edinburgh Trust, Project 
Authorization and Section 309 
Determinations for 235 Pine Street. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/29) 



Denial on July 9, 1987, of Project 
•Authorization and Site Permit for 
construction at 101 Second Street. 
APPLICATION NO. 8508909S. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/29) 



Denial on January 23, 1987, of permit 

to Alter a Building at 472-478 Turk 

Street. 

APPLICATION NO. 8613899. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/4) 



Denial on July 13, 1987, of permit 

to Alter a Building at 2744 Green 

Street. 

APPLICATION NO. 8700761 . 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/23) 



Denial on July 27, 1987, of permit 

to Alter a Building at 2286 Jackson 

Street . 

APPLICATION NO. 8705442. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/14) 



Denial on July 22, 1987, of permit 
a Building at 3958-3960A 18th Street 
APPLICATION NO. 8513930. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/13) 



Revocation on August 14, 1987, of permit 

to Erect a Structure at 30 Bonview 

Street. 

APPLICATION NO. 8701808. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/30) 

Protesting issuance on July 29, 1987, 

Pat Bretzer, permit to Alter a Building 

at 1346 Funston Avenue. 

APPLICATION NO. 8704351. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/12) 



Protesting 
to Carlton 
Building 
APPLICATION 
FOR HEARING 




ssuance on August 12, 1987, 
kinner, permit/to Alter a 
2465 Washingt/n Street, 
NO. 8710219, 
TODAY. (10/21) 



Protesting issuance on July 20, 1987, 
Michael Feldman, permit to Demolish 
a Building at 618 Spruce Street. 
APPLICATION NO. 8708862. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/8) 



Protesting issuance on July 22, 1987, 
to Doris Little, permit to Alter a 
Building at 549 Fell Street. 
APPLICATION NO. 8708437. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/12) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, SEPTEMBER 23, 1987 



PAGE THREE 



APPEAL NO. 87-225 



EDWARD KOVACH, Appellant 
]•) vs. 

DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



TED AKSNES, Appellant 
) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



MANUEL C. SOTOMAYOR, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



MARTIN WINDREL, Appellant 
I) vs. 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 87-22 



APPEAL NO. 87-23 



APPEAL NO. V87-2 



APPEAL NO. 87-21 



CHARLES L. & DONNA L. FIGONE, Appellants 
)) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



Protesting issuance on August 10, 1987, 
to Amy Powell and Ray Sukys, permit to 
Alter a Building at 3778-22nd Street. 
APPLICATION NO. 8710145. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/22) 



Protesting issuance on August 5, 1987, 
to Christ Wendel , permit to Alter a 
Building at 3827 Clay Street. 
APPLICATION NO. 8705808. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/26) 



Protesting issuance on August 13, 1987, 
to Robert Johnson, permit to Alter a 
Building at 400 Liberty Street. 
APPLICATION NO. 8709788. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/30) 



Protesting granting on July 24, 1987, 

to Tom Ford, Off-Street Parking Variance 

sought at 766 Valencia Street. 

FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/12) 



Protesting issuance on July 28, 1987, 
to Mr. & Mrs. Chow Fai Yip, permit to 
Alter a Building at 2267-30th Avenue. 
APPLICATION NO. 8705564. 
FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/15) 



) PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to two minutes for each speaker. 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 
JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 



DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN 
MATT IE J. JACKSON 
FRANK S, FUNG 
JOSE E. MEDINA 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 



VICE PRESIDENT 
COMMISSIONER 
COMMISSIONER 
COMMISSIONER 



THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing . 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING 
Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a decision 
and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and 
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shaTl not be made by the Board 
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a 
written request stating succinctly the grounds upon which such rehearing is requested, 
(b) If new evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show: 
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a 
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at 
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the 
previous hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations for 
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the 
Board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is 
considered by the Board. 



Robert H. Feldman 
Executive Director 
(415) 554-6720 



City and County of San Francisco 

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

Room 154-A, City Hall 

San Francisco, California 94102 




BOARD OF PERM3T APPEALS 
City Hall - Ruom 154-A 
San Francisco, CA 94102 /C/#<<u 

. ^i jj liiiuiaiu a n 

Public Library 



*£ 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 50, 1987 
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 



DOCUMENTS DEPT. 

SEP 2 91337 

SAN FRANCISCO 
HURI IC LIBRARY 



I) MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 

NO. A Letter from Kezar Poly Neighborhood Associa 
No. 87-195. The appellants had protested the issu 
ing at 701 Frederick Street. On August 26, 1987, 
Board voted 4-0 to uphold the Department and grant 
did not hear this appeal.) 

NO. B Letter from Ms. Ruth D. Raines requesting t 



tion requesting a rehearing of Appeal 

ance of a permit to demolish a build- 

upon motion of President Berg, the 

the permit. (Vice President Engmann 



a permit issued for construction at 2500-32nd Aven 

Permit issued 

Appeal period ended 

Request for jurisdiction received 

APPEAL NO. 87- 
MARKB0R0UGH CALIFORNIA PROPERTIES, 

Appellants 
vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



he Board to take jurisdiction over 
ue. 

August 24, 1987 

September 7, 1987 

September 23, 1987 



212 



"[Determinations on July 22, 1987, 
concerning the Appeal Process 
under Section 322 of the Planning 
Code. 
FOR REHEARING TODAY. (9/9) 



APPEAL NO. 87-182 



DERINGER DEVELOPMENT GROUP, Appellants 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 87-183 



DERINGER DEVELOPMENT GROUP, Appellants 
A) vs. 

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 87-189 



MARKBOROUGH CALIFORNIA PROPERTIES, 

Appellants 
8) vs. 

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 87-184 



DERINGER DEVELOPMENT GROUP, Appellants 
A) vs. 

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 87-187 



MARKBOROUGH CALIFORNIA PROPERTIES, 

Appellants 
B) vs. 

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 87-185 



DERINGER DEVELOPMENT GROUP, Appellants 
A) vs. 

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 87-1 



MARKBOROUGH CALIFORNIA PROPERTIES, 

Appellants 
B) vs. 

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, Respondent 



Denial on July 9, 1987, of 

Project Authorization and Site 

Permit at 1601 Mission Street. 

APPLICATION NO. 8500453S. 

FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (8/29) 

Protesting issuance on July 9, 

1987, to Federal Home Loan Bank, 

Project Authorization and Section 

309 Determinations for 600 California 

Street. 

FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (8/29) 

Protesting issuance on July 9, 1987, 

to Federal Home Loan Bank, 

Project Authorization and Section 

309 Determinations for 600 California 

Street. 

FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (8/29) 

Protesting issuance on July 9, 1987, 
to 343 Sansome Ventures, Project 
Authorization and Section 309 
Determinations for 343 Sansome Street 
FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (8/29) 

Protesting issuance on July 9, 1987, 
to 343 Sansome Ventures, Project 
Authorization and Section 309 
Determinations for 343 Sansome Street 
FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (8/29) 

Protesting issuance on July 9, 1987, 
to London & Edinburgh Trust, Project 
Authorization and Section 309 
Determinations for 235 Pine Street. 
FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (8/29) 

Protesting issuance on July 9, 1987, 
to London & Edinburgh Trust, Project 
Authorization and Section 309 
Determinations for 235 Pine Street. 
FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (8/29) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, SEPTEMBER 30, 1987 



PAGE TWO 



APPEAL NO. 87-186 



MARKBOROUGH CALIFORNIA PROPERTIES, 

vs. 
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, Respondent 



YASHIMA CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., 
YAN YAN CMU & TOP DEVELOPMENT, 
i\) vs. Appellants 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



YASHIMA CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., 
YAN YAN CHU & TOP DEVELOPMENT, 
3) vs. Appellants 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORkS, Respondent 



DOMINIC YAM, Appellant 
H) vs. 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



GEORGE JEONG, Appellant 
3) vs. 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



VILO PROPERTIES - c/o V. HONIG, 
D) vs. Appellant 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



MARY LEWIS, Appellant 
1) vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



CHARLES L. & DONNA L. FIGONE, 
2) vs. Appellants 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



YOUNG J. KIM, Appellant 
3) vs. 

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



THOMAS E. MCCORMICK, Appellant 
4) vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



T Denial on July 9, 1987, of Project 
[Authorization and Site Permit for 
[construction at 101 Second Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8508909S. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/29) 



APPEAL NO. 87-145 



[Revocation on June 3, 1987, 
[of permit to Erect a Structure 
[at 250-19th Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8604647. 
[FOR REHEARING TODAY. 



(7/22) 



APPEAL NO. 87-146 



[Revocation on June 3, 1987, 
[of permit to Erect a Structure 
[at 251-18th Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8604648. 
[FOR REHEARING TODAY. 



APPEAL NO. 87-207 

[Order to Cease Violation of 
[the Planning Code dated 
[July 21, 1987, for property 
[at 2900 Franklin Street. 
[FOR REHEARING TODAY. 

APPEAL NO. V87-197 

TDenial on July 13, 1987, of 
[Off-Street Parking Variance 
[sought for property at 
[2900 Franklin Street. 
[VARIANCE CASE NO. 87.318V. 
[FOR REHEARING TODAY. 



APPEAL NO. 87-221 



[Order to Cease Violation of 
[the Planning Code dated 
[July 29, 1987, for property 
[at 1513 Mission Street. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY 



APPEAL NO. 87-211 



[Protesting issuance on 
[July 22, 1987, to 
[Doris Little, permit to 
[Alter a Building at 
[549 Fell Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8708437. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY 



APPEAL NO. 87-216 



[Protesting issuance on 
[July 28, 1987, to 
[Mr. Chow Fai Yip, permit 
[to Alter a Building at 
[2267-30th Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8705564. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY 



APPEAL NO. 87-236 



"[Denial on August 26, 1987, 
[of Billiard Parlor permit 
[at 369 3rd Avenue. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



APPEAL NO. 87-204 



(7/22) 



(9/9) 



(8/31) 



(9/20) 



(9/12) 



(9/15) 



(10/12) 



"[Denial on July 20, 1987, 
[of permit to Erect a Structure 
[at 2675 25th Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8700229. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(8/31) 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS HEARING OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1987 



PAGE THREE 



ILLIAM POWERS, 
vs. 

iPl. PUBLIC WORKS, 
IWI DISAPPROVAL 



Appellant 

Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 86-223 



[Denial on August 22, 1986, 
[of permit to Alter a Building 
[at 2375-2377 Francisco Street, 
[APPLICATION NO. 8606123. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(10/7) 



APPEAL NO. 87-235 



4ING LEE EXPRESS PASSPORT PHOTOS, 
vs. Appellant 
)EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



[Revocation on August 26, 1987, 
[of permit to distribute free 
[pen and pencil samples at First 
[Street and Market Street. 



[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(10/10) 



APPEAL NO. 87-181 



\NTON JOHANN MUZIK AND 
SERALDYNE WILKIN, Appellants 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
:iTY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 
[July 9, 1987, to 
[William Turner, permit to 
[Demolish a Building at 
[54 Bret Harte Terrace. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8701645. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(8/29) 



APPEAL NO. 87-232 



■ T. SCHNEIDER, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



on 



[Protesting issuance 
[August 18, 1987, to 
[Chun Man Ma, permit to 
[Alter a Building at 
[149 Stratford Drive. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8708638 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(10/3) 



WILLIAM J. CONROY, Appellant 

vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 87-233 



[Protesting issuance on 
[August 13, 1987, to 
[Mark Berman, permit to 
[Alter a Building at 
[149 Seal Rock. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8708350. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(10/3) 



CONNIE B. GUITTARD, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 87-234 



[Protesting issuance on 
[August 19, 1987, to 
[Cheryl Cason, permit to 
[Alter a Building at 
[3756 Jackson Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8710901 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(10/2) 



ALLAN J. JOSEPH & PHYLLIS P. JOSEPH, 

vs. Appellants 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 87-248 



[Protesting issuance on 
[August 12, 1987, to 
[Carlton Skinner, permit to 
[Alter a Building at 
[2465 Washington Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8710219. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(10/21) 



) PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to two minutes for each speaker 



SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD 



DAVE RAWSON, Appellant 

vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 87^171 



{Denial on July 13, 1987, of permit 
[to Alter a Building at 2744 Green 

[Street. 

[SITE INSPECTION WEDNESDAY, 

[SEPTEMBER 30, 1987, at 3:30 P.*. 



MEMBERS OF TH E BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN VICE PRESIDENT 

MATTIE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

JOSE E. MEDINA COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing . 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING 
Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a decision 
and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and 
to prevent manvfest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be made by the Board 
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a 
written request stating succinctly the grounds upon which such rehearing is requested, 
(b) If new evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show: 
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a 
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at 
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the 
previous hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations for 
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the 
Board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is 
considered by the Board. 



Robert H. Feldman 
Executive Director 
(415) 554-6720 



City and County of San Francisco 

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

Room 154-A, City Hall 

San Francisco, California 94102 



mm OF PERMIT APPEALS 

City Hall - Room 154-A 

San Francisco, CA 94102 




-e -m LIBRARIAN 
Public Library 




^ 






/?i/&7 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 21, 1987 
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 



DOCUMENTS DEFT. 
OCT Z 2 IS 

San FRANCISCO 
PUBLIC LIBRARY 



MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER COF DESPONDENCE 

TEM NO. 1 Letter from Eugene J. Mitchell requesting the Board to rehear Appeal No. 87-209. 

The appellant had protested the issuance of e permit to alter a building at 1346 Funston 

Wenue. On September 23, 1987, upon motion of Vice President Engmann, the Board voted 

|l-0 to uphold the Department and grant the permit. Commissioner Fung was absent from the 
rearing. 

■TEM NO. 2 Letter from W. G. & M. T. Schneider requesting the Board to rehear Appeal No. 
\l-2il . TFe appellant had protested the issuance of a permit to alter a building at 149 
itratford Drive. On September 30, 1987, upon motion of Commissioner Medina, the Board 
'Oted 5-0 to uphold the Department and grant the permit. 

TEM NO. 3 Letter from Lloyd R. Crenna, Esq., on behalf of Thomas McCormick requesting 
i rehearing of Appeal No. 87-204 . On September 30, 1987, UDon motion of Commissioner 

ung, the Board voted 2-3 to overrule the department and grant the permit. (Commissioners 
lerg, Engmann and Medina dissented.) Four votes needed to overrule, the department was 
ipheld and the permit denied. 

TEM NO 4 Letter from Connie Guittard requesting the Board to rehear Appeal No. 84-234. 

he appellant had protested the issuance to Cheryl Cason a permit to alter a building at 
1756 Jackson Street. On September 30, 1987, upon motion of Commissioner Fung, the Board 
'Oted 4-0 to uphold the department and grant the permit subject to conditions. (President 
i»erg absent. ) 

TEM NO. 5 Letter from Jack Mason requesting the Board to take jurisdiction over denial 
if variances for Off-Street Parking, Front Setback and Screening of Off- Street Parking 
ought for property at 3009 Jackson Street. 

Variance decision dated 

Appeal period ended 

Request for jurisdiction received 



July 22, 1987 
August 3, 1987 
September 29, 1987 



TEM NO. 6 Letter from Elizabeth Boileau requesting the Board to take jurisdiction over 
building permit issued for construction of a building at 568 Mississippi Street. 

Permit issued August 14, 1987 

Appeal period ended August 24, 1987 

Request for jurisdiction received August 25, 1987 

TEMS 2A THROUGH 2H FOR ADOPTION OF FINDINGS. PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN CLOSED. 



DERINGER DEVELOPMENT GROUP, 
M vs. Appellants 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 87-182 



DERINGER DEVELOPMENT GROUP, 

vs. Appellants 
IITY PLANNING COMMISSION, 

Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 87-183 



1ARKB0R0UGH CALIFORNIA PROPERTIES, 

vs. Appellants 
IITY PLANNING COMMISSION, 

Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 87-189 



[Denial on July 9, 1987, 

[of Project Authorization 

[and Site Permit at 

[1601 Mission Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8500453S. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (8/29) 

[Protesting issuance on 

[Julu 9, 1987, to 

[Federal Home Loan Bank, 

[Project Authorization and 

[Section 309 Determinations 

[for 600 California Street. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (8/29) 

[Protesting issuance on 

[July 9, 1987, to 

[Federal Home Loan Bank, 

[Project Authorization and 

[Section 309 Determinations 

[for 600 California Street. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (8/29) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, OCTOBER 21, 1987 



PAGE TWO 



APPEAL NO. 87-184 



DERINGER DEVELOPMENT GROUP, 
) vs. Appellant 

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, 

Respondent 



[Protesting issuance on 
[July 9, 1987, to 
[343 Sansome Ventures, 
[Project Authorization and 
[Section 309 Determinations 
[for 343 Sansome Street. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 



APPEAL NO. 87-187 



DERINGER DEVELOPMENT GROUP, 

vs. Appellant 
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, 

Respondent 



[Protesting issuance on 
[on July 9, 1987, to 
[343 Sansome Ventures, 
[Project Authorization and 
[Section 309 Determinations 
[for 343 Sansome Street. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 



APPEAL NO. 87-185 



DERINGER DEVELOPMENT GROUP, 

vs. Appellant 
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, 

Respondent 



MARKBOROUGH CALIFORNIA PROPERTIES, 

vs. Appellant 
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, 

Respondent 



MARKBOROUGH CALIFORNIA PROPERTIES, 

vs. Appellant 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



DAVE RAWSON, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



DAVID HOWARD, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



ANTON- JOHANN MUZIK AND 
GERALDYNE WITKIN, Appellants 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



ANTON-JOHANN MUZIK AND 
GERALDYNE WITKIN, Appellants 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 
[July 9, 1987, to 
[London & Edinburgh Trust 
[Project Authorization and 
[Section 309 Determinations 
[for 235 Pine Street. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 



APPEAL NO. 87-188 



[Protesting issuance on 

[July 9, 1987, to 

[London & Edinburgh Trust, 

[Project Authorization and 

[Section 309 Determinations 

[for 235 Pine Street. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 



APPEAL NO. 87-186 



"[Denial on July 9, 1987, 
[of Project Authorization 
[and Site Permit at 
[101 Second Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8508909S, 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY 



APPEAL NO. 87-171 



"[Denial on July 13, 1987, of 
[permit to Alter a Building 
[at 2744 Green Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8700761. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 



APPEAL NO. 87-115 



"[Denial on April 27, 1987, 
[of permit to Alter a Building 
[at 405 Clayton Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8511545. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 



APPEAL NO. 87-181 



[Protesting issuance on 
[July 9, 1987, to Turner, 
[Asknes & Raraglia, permit 
[to Demolish a Building 
[at 54 Bret Harte Terrace. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8701645. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



APPEAL NO. 87-260 



[Protesting issuance on 
[September 18, 1987, to 
[Turner, Asknes & Rarglia, 
[permit to Erect a Structure 
[at 54 Bret Harte Terrace. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8701108. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(8/29) 



(8/29) 



(8/29) 



(8/29) 



(8/29) 



(8/23) 



(6/16) 



(8/29) 



(11/4) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, OCTOBER 21, 1987 



PAGE THREE 



APPEAL NOS. 



EDMUND L. JUNG, 
vs. 
POLICE COMMISSION, 



Appellant 
Respondent 



87-198, 87-199 & 87-200 

[Revocation by the San Francisco 
[Police Commission (Motion No. 
[825-87) on July 17, 1987, of 
[three Motorized Rickshaw permits. 
[MR-1, MR-2 & MR-3. 
[FOR REHEARING TODAY (9/2) 



APPEAL NO. 87-218 



EDGARDO VIDES, 

dba, "EL ZOCALO RESTAURANT," 

vs. Appellant 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



FLOR D. MARTINEZ, 
dba, "LOS PANCHOS RESTAURANT," 
vs. Appellant 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



VAN CAM VO, 
I dba, "HONG KONG MASSAGE," 

vs. Appellant 
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



RICHARD & REGINA PLUT, Appellants 
1 ) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



"[Denial on July 29, 1987, 
[of Cabaret permit at 
[3230 Mission Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(9/15) 



APPEAL NO. 87-219 



"[Denial on July 31, 1987 
[of Cabaret permit at 
[3206 Mission Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(9/16) 



APPEAL NO. 87-222 



[Revocation on July 31, 1987, 

[of Massage Establishment permit 

[at 450-B Jones Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/20) 



APPEAL NO. 87-180 



TProtesting issuance on 
[July 15, 1987, to Dr. Johnson 
[permit to Alter a Building 
[at 566 Kansas Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8704654. 
[FOR REHEARING TODAY. 



(8/29) 



APPEAL NO. 87-227 



1) 



JIM ILNICKI, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 
[August 7, 1987, to 
[Jose Murrillo, permit to 
[Erect a Structure at 
[220 Peralta Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8504983. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY 



(9/23) 



VILO PROPERTIES - c/o V. HONIG, 
1 ) vs. Appellant 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 87-221 



[Order to Cease Violation 
[of the Planning Code dated 
[July 29, 1987, for property 
[at 1513 Mission Street. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 



(9/20) 



PAUL SCHWARTZ, Appellant 
1 ) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 87-230 



[Revocation on August 14, 1987, 
[of permit to Erect a Structure 
[at 30 Bonview Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8701808. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(9/30) 



APPEAL NO. 87-250 



HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AND NEIGHBORHOOD 
PRESERVATION CORPORATION, Appellants 
1 ) vs. 

DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 

tl. ROBERT LAWRENCE, Appellant 
A) vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Denial on September 15, 1987, 
[of permit to Alter a Building 
[at 504 Valencia Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8712780. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



APPEAL NO. 87-206 



[Protesting issuance on 
[July 20, 1987, to 
[Michael Feldman, permit 
[to Demolish a Building 
[at 618 Spruce Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8708862 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(10/26) 



(9/8) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, OCTOBER 21, 1987 



PAGE FOUR 



APPEAL NO. 87-253 



D. ROBERT LAWRENCE, Appellant 
5B) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 

[September 9, 1987, to 

[Max Rozetti , permit to 

[Erect a Structure at 

[618 Spruce Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8787804. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (10/31) 



APPEAL NO. 87-244 



HERBERT W. & SALLY L. DUNMEYER, 
) vs. Appellants 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 

[September 1, 1987, to 

[Ping Fong, permit to 

[Alter a Building at 

[341 Warren Drive. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8709984. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (10/20) 



APPEAL NO. 87-255 



GASTON MARCILLAC, Appellant 
') vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 

[September 16, 1987, to 

[SF Chinese Alliance Church 

[permit to Demolish a Building 

[at 1150 Vicente Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8711443. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/2) 



APPEAL NO. 87-257 



JERRY K. REIMANN, Appellant 
) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 

[September 17, 1987, to 

[Joan Crowley, permit to 

[Alter a Building at 

[1164-1166 Filbert Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8710437. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/2) 



GEORGE & MAE FINNEGAN, Appellant 
)) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 87-258 



"[Protesting issuance on 
[September 18, 1987, to 
[Yen Tarn, permit to 
[Alter a Building at 
[1839 Cabrillo Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8703903. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/2) 



APPEAL NO. 87-261 



ZOYA A. LUKIAN, Appellant 
A) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 

[September 22, 1987, to 

[Familiar, LTD., permit to 

[Alter a Building at 

[1820 Union Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8712607. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/7) 



APPEAL NO. 87-262 



J. H. & SHIRLEY E. JACOBS, 
B) vs. Appellants 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 

[September 22, 1987, to 

[Familiar LTD., permit to 

[Alter a Building at 

[1820 Union Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8712607. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/7) 



APPEAL NO. 87-263 



GREENWICH-GRANT HOMEOWNERS' 
ASSOCIATION, Appellant 
) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 

[September 16, 1987, to 

[John, Shirley & Sherman Yee, 

[permit to Alter a Building 

[at 1654-1656 Grant Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8707387. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/7) 



) PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to two minutes for each speaker. 



MEMBERS OF T HE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN VICE PRESIDENT 

MATTIE J, JACKSON COilMISSlONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

JOSE E. MEDINA COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINl - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemec necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later thar two days before the appointed hearing . 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before their; 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Kailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
roon., no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING 
Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a decision 
and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and 
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be made by the Board 
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a 
written request stating succinctly the grounds upon which such rehearing is requested. 
(b) If new evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show: 
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a 
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at 
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the 
previous hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations for 
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the 
Board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is 
considered by the Board. 



Robert H. Feldman C1tv and Countv of Sari Francisco 

Executive Director B0ARD 0F PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 554-6720 Rooni 154 ' A * Citv Hal1 

San Francisco, California 94102 



BCARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

City HgI! - Room 154-A 

San Francisco, CA 94102 




ChC& 




Public Library 



DOCUMENTS DEPT. 



* 2 MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 



WEDNESDAY NOVEMBER 4, 1987 
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 



SAN FKANCiSCO 
PUBLIC L"B«APV 



1) MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 

ITEM NO. 1 Letter from Paul Schwartz requesting the Board to rehear Appeal No. 87-230 
The appellant had appealed the revocation of a permit to erect a structure at 30 — 
Bonview Street. On October 21, 1987, upon motion of President Berg, the Board voted 
4-0 to uphold the Department's revocation of the permit. Commissioner Fung was absent 
from the hearing. 

ITEM NO. 2 Letter from D. Robert Lawrence requesting the Board to rehear Appeal No. 
87-206 . The appellant had protested the issuance of a permit to demolish a building 
at 618 Spruce Street. On October 21, 1987, upon motion of Vice President Engmann, the 
Board voted 3-1 to overrule the Department and deny the permit. Commissioner Jackson 
dissented. Commissioner Fung was absent. Four votes needed to overrule, the Department 
was upheld and the permit granted* without Prop M Findings. Heard with Item 3. 

ITEM NO. 3 Letter from D. Robert Lawrence requesting the Board to rehear Appeal No. 
87-253 . The appellant had protested the issuance of a permit to erect a structure at 
618 Spruce Street. On October 21, 1987, upon motion of Vice President Engmann, the 
Board voted 3-1 to overrule the Department and deny the permit. Commissioner Jackson 
dissented. Commissioner Fung was absent. Four votes needed to overrule, the Department 
was upheld and the permit granted, without Prop M Findings. 

ITEM NO. 4 Letter from George Robert Pickerrell requesting the Board to take juris- 
diction over a Cease and Desist order issued by the Department of City Planning on 
September 28, 1987, for property at 1547.Jerrold Avenue. 

Letter issued September 28, 1987 

Appeal period ended October 8, 1987 

Request for jurisdiction received October 20, 1987 

APPEAL NO. 87-171 

DAVE RAWS0N, Appellant [Denial on July 13, 1987, of 

2) vs. [permit to Alter a Building 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [at 2744 Green Street. 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8700761. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (8/23) 

APPEAL NO. 87-233 

WILLIAM J. C0NR0Y, Appellant [Protesting issuance on 

3) vs. [August 13, 1987, to 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Mark Berman, permit to 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Alter a Building at 

[149 Seal Rock. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8708350. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (10/3) 

APPEAL NO. 87-263 

GREENWICH-GRANT HOMEOWNERS' [Protesting issuance on 

ASSOCIATION, Appellant [September 16, 1987, to 

\) vs. [John, Shirley & Sherman Yee, 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [permit to Alter a Building 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [at 1654-1656 Grant Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8707387. 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (11/7) 

APPEAL NO. 87-211 

MARY LEWIS, Appellant LProtesting issuance on 

>A) vs. [July 22, 1987, to 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Dora Little, permit to 

[Alter a Building at 

[549 Fell Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 87Q8437... 

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (9/12) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, NOVEMBER k, 1987 



PAGE TWO 



SHIRO BILLECCI, Appellant 
jB) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



YASHIMA CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., 
YAN YAN CHU & TOP DEVELOPMENT, 
5A) vs. Appellants 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



YASHIMA CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., 
YAN YAN CHU & TOP DEVELOPMENT, 
>B) vs. Appellants 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



BIENVENIDA CASTILLO, Appellant 
vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



GEORGE COLES, Appellant 
\) vs. 

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



MARIE HOWARD, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



DONALD E. THOMPSON, Appellant 
10A) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



DON THOMPSON & TONY HAYNE, 
OB) vs. Appellants 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 87-273 



[Protesting issuance on 

[September 24, 1987, to 

[Dora Little, permit to 

[Alter a Building at 

[549 Fell Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8711707. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/14) 



APPEAL NO. 87-145 



[Revocation on June 3, 1987, 

[of permit to Erect a Structure 

[at 250-19th Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8604647. 

[FOR REHEARING TODAY. (7/22) 



APPEAL NO. 87-146 



[Revocation on June 3, 1987, 

[of permit to Erect a Structure 

[at 251-18th Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8604648. 

[FOR REHEARING TODAY. (7/22) 



APPEAL NO. 87-306 



[Imposition of Penalty on 

[October 23, 1987, for work 

[done at 3916 26th Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8701167. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/2) 



APPEAL NO. 87-239 



[Revocation on June 16, 1987, 

[of Outcall Massage service 

[permit at 1000 Silver Avenue. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (10/14) 



APPEAL NO. 87-256 



"[Denial on September 23, 1987, 

[of permit to Alter a Building 

[at 860-864 Northpoint Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8713648. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/2) 



APPEAL NO. 87-238 



[Protesting issuance on 

[August 25, 1987, to 

[Minnesota Lofts Associates 

[permit to Alter a Building 

Lat 601 Minnesota Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8707793. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (10/14) 



APPEAL NO. 87-254 



[Protesting issuance on 

[September 14, 1987, to 

[Minnesota Lofts Associates, 

[permit to Alter a Building 

[at 601 Minnesota Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8706599. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/1) 



APPEAL NO. 87-268 



TONY HAYNE, Appellant 
IOC) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 

[September 22, 1987, to 

[Minnesota Lofts Associates, 

[permit to Alter a Building 

[at 601 Minnesota Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8707553. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/10) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, NOVEMBER 4, 1987 



PAGE THREE 



APPEAL NO. 87-275 



TONY HAYNE, Appellant 
OD) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 

[September 29, 1987, to 

[Minnesota Lofts Associates, 

[permit to Alter a Building 

[at 601 Minnesota Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8707559. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/17) 



APPEAL NO. 87-276 



DONALD E. THOMPSON, Appellant 
OE) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 

[September 29, 1987, to 

[Minnesota Lofts Associates 

[permit to Alter a Building 

[at 601 Minnesota Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8708072. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/18) 



APPEAL NO. 87-240 



BROADWAY TUNNEL PARK COMMITTEE, 
1) vs. Appellants 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 

[August 28, 1987, to 

[Pineview Housing Corporation, 

[permit to Erect a Structure 

[at 1483 Mason Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8704439. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (10/14) 



APPEAL NO. 87-242 



RICHARD WIEKING, Appellant 
2) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 

[August 28, 1987, to 

[Alex Fisherman, permit to 

[Alter a Building at 

[646-40th Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8707801. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (10/18) 



APPEAL NO. 87-245 



WILLIAM & JAOQUELINE MC DOWELL, 
3) vs. Appellants 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 
[September 2, 1987, to 
[Hon & Pui Sim K. Szeto, 
[permit to Alter a Building 
[at 50 Seal Rock Drive. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8709017. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(10/27) 



APPEAL NO. 87-249 



RICHMOND COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, 
4) vs. Appellants 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 
[September 4, 1987, to 
[Edward Shoikhet, permit to 
[Demolish a Building at 
[550-8th Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8703452. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(10/24) 



APPEAL NO. 87-251 



SERENA DE. BELLIS, Appellant 
15) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 
[September 15, 1987, to 
[Johnson Wong, permit to 
[Erect a Structure at 
[150 Bepler Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8706946, 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(10/28) 



APPEAL NO. 87-264 



SUSAN CLEMENTE, Appellant 
16) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 
[September 17, 1987, to 
[Bethel Temple, permit 
[to Erect a Structure 
[at 121 Bradford Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8707478, 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(11/7) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, NOVEMBER 4, 1987 PAGE FOUR 



APPEAL NO. V87-266 

NHU NGUYEN, Appellant [Protesting condition 

7) vs. [of variance granted on 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [September 24, 1987, for 

[property located at 

[1232-46th Avenue 

[VARIANCE CASE NO. 87.420V. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/8) 

8) PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to two minutes for each speaker. 



MEMBERS OF T HE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN VICE PRESIDENT 

MATTIE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

JOSE E. MEDINA COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less" If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
board not later than two days before the appointed hearing . 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before their, 
unless 6 Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing roust be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Kailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING 
Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a decision 
and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and 
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be made by the Board 
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a 
written request stating succinctly the grounds upon which such rehearing is requested. 
(b) If new evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show: 
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a 
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at 
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the 
previous hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations for 
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the 
Board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is 
considered by the Board. 



Robert H. Feldman Cit >' and Co™ 1 * of San Francisco 

Executive Director B M*D OF PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 554-6720 koom 154 " A » Cit y Hal1 

San Francisco, California 94102 



^ ^ PERMIT APPEALS 

n 154-A 
. CA 94102 



■£H* LI B R ARIAN - $pc/» 
Public Library 



.T* 



-'f MEETINGS OF THE BOARD OF PaffT APPEALS D0 CUMENTS DEPT 

p WEDNESDAY^OVEMBER #1987 

* 2 5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HAL L NUV L M 



1) MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING : 

NO. A Letter from Timothy Tosta, Esq., on behalf of Markborough Properties Inc., 
requesting rehearing of Appeals Nos. 87-186 , 87-187 , 87-188 , and 87-189 . 
Appeal No. 87-186 . .Protesting denial of Project Authorization and Site permit at 101 
Second Street. Appeal No. 87-187 . .Protesting issuance to 343 Sansome Ventures, Project 
Authorization and Section 309 Determinations for 343 Sansome Street. Appeal No. 87-188 . . 
Protesting issuance to London & Edinburgh Trust, Project Authorization and Section - 
309 Determinations for 235 Pine Street. Appeal No. 87-189. .Protesting issuance to 
Federal Home Loan Bank, Project Authorization and Section 309 Determinations for 600 
California Street. On September 23, 1987, upon motion of President Berg, the Board 
voted unanimously to uphold the decisions of the City Planning Commission and Department 
of Public Works on the above appeals. 

NO. B Letter from Craig J. Cannizzo, Esq., on behalf of Deringer Development Group, 
requesting rehearing of Appeals Nos. 87-182 , 87-183 , 87-184 , and 87-185 . 
Appeal No. 87-182 . .Denial of Project Authorization and Site Permit at 1601 Mission 
Street. Appeal No. 87-184 . .Protesting issuance to 343 Sansome Ventures, Project 
Authorization and Section 309 Determinations for 343 Sansome Street. Appeal No. 87-185 . . 
Protesting issuance to London & Edinburgh Trust Project Authorization and Section 309 
Determinations for 235 Pine Street. Appeal No. 87-183 . .Protesting issuance to Federal 
Home Loan Bank, Project Authorization and Section 309 Determinations for 600 California 
Street. On September 23, 1987, upon motion of President Berg, the Board voted unanimously 
to uphold the decisions of the City Planning Commission and the Department of Public Works. 

NO. C Letter from appellant, James Ilnicki, requesting the Board to rehear Appeal No. 
87-22 7. The appellant protested the issuance of a permit to erect a structure at 
220 Peralta Avenue. On October 21, 1987, upon motion of Commissioner Medina, the Board 
voted 4-0 to uphold the Department and grant the permit subject to conditions. 
Commissioner Fung was absent. 

NO. D Letter from Judith C. Miles, Esq., and John M. Sanger, Esq., on behalf of Anton- 
Johann Muzik & Geraldyne Witkin, requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 87-181 . The appellants 
protested the issuance to William Turner of a permit to demolish a structure at 54 
Bret Harte Terrace. On October 21, 1987, upon motion of Commissioner Jackson, the 
Board voted 4-0 to uphold the Department and grant the permit. Commissioner Fung was 
absent 

NO. E Letter from Judith C. Miles, Esq., and John M. Sanger, Esq., on behalf of Anton- 
Johann Muzik and Geraldyne Witkin, requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 87-260 . The 
appellants protested the issuance to Turner, Asknes, and Raraglia of permit to erect 
a structure at 54 Bret Harte Terrace. On October 21, 1987, upon motion of Commissioner 
Jackson, the Board voted 4-0 to uphold the Department and grant the permit. Commissioner 
Fung was absent. 

NO F Letter from David Howard requesting a rehearing of Appeal No. 87-115 . On October 21, 
1987 , the appellant protested the denial of a permit to alter a building at 405 Clayton 
Street. On October 21, 1987, upon motion of President Berg, the Board voted 3-1 to 
uphold the the Department and deny the permit. Commissioner Jackson dissented. Commis- 
sioner Fung was absent. 

NO. G Letter from Tony Gheno requesting a rehearing of Appeal No . 87-2 21 . The appellant 
appealed the Zoning Administrator's Order to Cease Violation of the Planning Code for 
property located at 1513 Mission Street. On October 21, 1987, upon motion of President 
Berg, the Board voted 4-0 to uphold the Zoning Administrator's order. 

NO. H Letter from Paul Schwartz requesting the Board to rehear Appeal No. 87-230 . 
The appellant had appealed the revocation of a permit to erect a structure at 30 Bonview 
Street. On October 21, 1987, upon motion of President Berg, the Board voted 4-0 to 
uphold the Department's revocation of the permit. Commissioner Fung was absent. 

FOR ADOPTION OF FINDINGS ONLY. Public hearing closed. 

NO. I Appeal No. 87-240 . .Permit granted to erect a structure at 1483 Mason Street. 
Hearing held November 4, 1987. 

NO. J Appeal No. 87-239 . . Revocation of outcall massage service permit at 1000 Silver 
Avenue. Hearing held November 4, 1987. 

NO. K Appeal No. 87-222 . .Denial of massage establishment permit at 450-B Street. Hearing 
held October 21, 1987. 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEAL HEARING OF NOVEMBER 18, 1987 PAGE TWO 

ADOPTION OF FINDINGS OF FACT (Continued): 

NO. L Appeal No. 87-204 . .Denial of permit to erect a structure at 2675-25th Avenue. 
Hearing held September 30, 1987.. 

REQUEST FOR JURISDICTION BEYOND THE 10-DAY APPEAL PERIOD 

NO. M Letter from Nancy Owyang requesting the Board to take jurisdiction over penalty 
assessed on ?ermit issued for construction at 2427-1 8th Avenue. 



Permit issued 

Appeal period ended 

Request for jurisdiction received 

APPEAL NO. 87- 171 

DAVE RAWSON, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



October 23, 1987 
November 2, 1987 
November 9, 1987 



"[Denial on July 13, 1987, of 
[permit to Alter a Building 
[at 2744 Green Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8700761. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 



APPEAL NO. 87-120 



RICHARD REINECCIUS, Appellant 
,) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 
[May 6, 1987, to Lynn Susoeff, 
[permit to Erect a Structure 
[at 8 Southern Heights Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8602215. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 



APPEAL NO. 87-122 



BRUCE DAVIES, Appellant 
) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 
[May 6, 1987, to Lynn Susoeff, 
[permit to Erect a Structure 
[at 2 Southern Heights Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8602205. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 



APPEAL NO. 87-123 



BRUCE DAVIES, Appellant 
) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 
[May 6, 1987, to Lynn Susoeff, 
[permit to Erect a Structure 
[at 4 Southern Heights Avenue 
[APPLICATION NO. 8602216. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 



APPEAL NO. 87-124 



BRUCE DAVIES, Appellant 
I) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 
[May 6, 1987, to Lynn Susoeff, 
[permit to Erect a Structure 
[at 6 Southern Heights Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8602214. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 



APPEAL NO. 87-242 



RICHARD WIEKING, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 
[August 28, 1987, to 
[Alex Fisherman, permit 
[to Alter a Building at 
[646-40th Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8707801. 
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. 



D. ROBERT LAWRENCE, Appellant 
vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 87-206 



[Protesting issuance on 
[July 20, 1987, to 
[Michael Feldman, permit to 
[Demolish a Building at 
[618 Spruce Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8708862. 
[FOR REHEARING TODAY. 



(8/23) 



(6/24) 



(6/24) 



(6/24) 



(6/24) 



(10/18) 



(9/8) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, NOVEMBER 18, 1987 



PAGE THREE 



D. ROBERT LAWRENCE, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



APPEAL NO. 87-253 



"[Protesting issuance on 
[September 9, 1987, to 
[Max Rozetti , permit to 
[Erect a Structure at 
[618 Spruce Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8787804. 
[FOR REHEARING TODAY. 



(10/31) 



APPEAL NO. 87-279 



AZZEZ I. BAJALIA, Appellant 

vs. 
POLICE DEPT., Respondent 



VANG THI TRAN, Appellant 

vs. 
POLICE DEPT., Respondent 



[Revocation on October 7, 1987, 
[of Mechanical Amusement Device 
[at 100 Gough Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(11/17) 



APPEAL NO. 87-283 



[Revocation on 
[September 30, 1987, of 
[Massage Establishment permit 
[at 585 Eddy Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(11/18) 



APPEAL NO. 87-280 



JAMES B. DELMAN, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



"[Denial on September 28, 1987, 
[of permit to Alter a Building 
[at 791-23rd Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8707314. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(11/17) 



APPEAL NO. 87-265 



WOON HING LEE, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



[Order to Cease and Desist 
[on September 18, 1987, from 
[the use and the violations 
[at 3164 Sacramento Street. 
[(Dry Cleaning Processing 
[Operation) . 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(11/7) 



APPEAL NO. 87-267 



EUGENE ORLOFF, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



[Order to Cease and Desist 
[on September 23, 1987, from 
[the operation of the 
[Automobile Repair Garage 
[at 1970 McAllister Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(11/9) 



APPEAL NO. 87-269 



A) 



SANDRA P. VELASCO & 

E. & E. HALL, Appellants 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 
[September 23, 1987, to 
[William & Elizabeth Edwards, 
[permit to Alter a Building 
[at 2826 Broderick Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8709723. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(11/10) 



APPEAL NO. 87-272 



B) 



ELIZABETH P. BECKETT, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 
[September 23, 1987, to 
[William L. & Elizabeth Edwards, 
[permit to Alter a Building 
[at 2826 Broderick Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8709723. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(11/14) 



APPEAL NO. 87-270 



A) 



ROBERT M. STEINER & 

CLAIRE E. B. WHITMER, Appellants 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 
[September 25, 1987, to 
[Mitchell J. Bilafer, permit 
[to Demolish a Building 
[at 331-29th Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8706876. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(11/10) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, NOVEMBER 18, 1987 



PAGE FOUR 



2B) 



APPEAL NO. 87-287 



KERRY R. STOEBNER, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 
[October 1, 1987, to 
[Mitchell J. Bilafer, permit 
[to Erect a Structure 
[at 331-29th Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8706875. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(11/22) 



APPEAL NO. V87-271 



) 



KENNETH M. HOWARD, Appellant 

vs. 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



[Protesting issuance on 
[September 22, 1987, to 
[Aquatic Park Investors, 
[Rear Yard & Open Space 
[variance sought for 
[property located at 
[834-848 Northpoint Street. 
[VARIANCE CASE NO. 87.265V. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(11/18) 



APPEAL NO. 87-282 



PACIFIC AVENUE NEIGHBORS, 
) vs. Appellants 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



[Protesting issuance on 
[September 29, 1987, to 
[Gene Aubrey, permit to 
[Alter a Building at 
[2961 Pacific Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8713914, 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(11/18) 



APPEAL NO. 87-284 



EUGENE J. MITCHELL, Appellant 

vs. 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 
[October 6, 1987, to 
[Thomas Spillane, permit to 
[Alter a Building at 
[1340 Funston Avenue. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8710282. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(11/18) 



APPEAL NO. 87-285 



GERDA KAINZ, Appellant 
A) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 
[September 29, 1987, to 
[William Spiers, permit to 
[Erect a Structure at 
[216 Roosevelt Way. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8615272. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(11/18) 



APPEAL NO. 87-286 



GERDA KAINZ, Appellant 
B) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



[Protesting isusance on 
[September 29, 1987, to 
[John Lau, permit to 
[Alter a Building at 
[218 Roosevelt Way. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8712603. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(11/17) 



APPEAL NO. 87-281 



WILLIAM SIMPICH, Appellant 
) vs. 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 



GEORGE DOUBLEDAY, Appellant 
) vs. 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



[Determination on 
[September 28, 1987, that the 
[Department of City Planning 
[would not accept a variance 
[application for property at 
[1019 Ashbury Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 

V87-274 

"~ ["Denial on September 30, 1987, 
[of Rear Yard Variance sought 
[for property located at 
[2627 Lombard Street. 
[VARIANCE CASE NO. 87.521V. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(11/17) 



(11/17) 






) PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to two minutes for each speaker. 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN VICE PRESIDENT 

MATTIE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

JOSE E. MEDINA COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 



BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing . 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING 
Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a decision 
and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and 
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be made by the Board 
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a 
written request stating succinctly the grounds upon which such rehearing is requested, 
(b) If new evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show: 
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a 
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at 
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the 
previous hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations for 
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the 
Board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is 
considered by the Board. 



Robert H. Feldman Cit >' and Count ^ of San Francisco 

Executive Director BO™ 0F PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 554-6720 Rooni 154 " A » Cit y Hal1 

San Francisco, California 94102 



board df f^ ? ::t appeals 

City Hal, - Room 154-A 
San Francisco, CA 94102 




'<?cas 



Public Library 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF- PEWIT APPEALS 



P 

3D 
I , 



Wednesday; December 2, 1987 
5:00 p.m., room 282, city hall 



MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 
FOR ADOPTION OF FINDINGS ONLY. Public heanno closed. 



DQCu?v<£rtT3 DEPT. 

dec 2 mi 



SriN FRANCISCO 

PUflUfi IIBDAOV 



ITEM A Appeal No. 87-171 . Permit to alter a building at 2744 Green Street. Hearing 
held November IE, 1987. board voted 5-0 to overrule and grant on conditions. 

ITEK E Appeal No. 87-206 . Permit to demolish a building at 618 Spruce Street. Hearing 



November 1£, 1987. 
to overrule) . 



board voted 3-2 to uphold permit (Commissioners Engmann and Medina 

Hearing 



ITEK C Appeal No. 87-253 . Permit to erect a structure at 618 Spruce Street 
November 1£, 1987. board voted 5-0 to uphold permit. 

ITEK D Appeal No. V87-271 . Protest of variance granted for property at 860-864 North 
Point Street. Hearing November 18, 1987. Board voted 4-1 (Commission Jackson) to overrule 
variance. 

REQUEST FOR REHEARING 

ITEK E Letter from appellant, William McDowell, requesting the Board to rehear Appeal 
No. 87-245 . The appellant protested the issuance of permit to alter a building at 
50 Seal Rock Drive. On November 4, 1987, upon motion of Commissioner Fung, the Board 
voted 4-0 to uphold the Department and grant the permit subject to conditions. President 
berg was absent. 



APPEAL NO. 87-134 



FRANK L. BURRELL, Appellant 
(2) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



RICHARD & REGINA PLUT, 
(3) vs. Appellants 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



CARMEN E. DURAN, dba 
Francesca International Cuisine, 
3a) vs Appellant 

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



ROBERT C0LBURN, 
dba "YELLOW CAB COMPANY", 
(4) vs. Appellant 

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



MATTHEW D. SHUSTER III, 
(5) vs. Appellant 

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 87-180 



APPEAL NO. 87-312 



"[Protesting issuance on 
[May 22, 1987, to Cheryl Cason 
[permit to Alter a Building 
[at 2502 Broadway Street. 
[REMANDED FROM SUPERIOR COURT. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 

l_ 

[Protesting issuance on 
[July 15, 1987m to Dr. Johnson, 
[permit to Alter a Building 
[at 566 Kansas Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8704654. 
[FOR REHEARING TODAY. 

» 

I Denial on October 19, 1987, 
[of Dance Hall Keeper and Place 
[of Entertainment permits at 
[2909 Mission Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(7/8) 



(8/29) 



(12/7) 



APPEAL NO. 87-243 



APPEAL NO. 87-291 



APPEAL NO. 87-292 



RALPH W. DRIPS, 
(6) vs. 

POLICE DEPARTMENT, 



Appellant 
Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 87-303 



ANTHONY LOPEZ, Appellant 
7A) vs. 

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



[Suspension on August 26,1987, 
[of Driver Public Vehicle permit 
[for thirty dayes, twenty days 
[held in abeyance. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 

[Revocation on October 7, 1987, 
[of Driver Public Passenger 
[vehicle permit. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 
» 

[Revocation on October 7, 1987, 
[of Mechanical Amusement Device 
[permit at 1610 Irving Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 

I 

"[Revocation on October 7, 1987, 
[of Billiard Parlor permit at 
[3079 16th Street. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(10/18) 



(11/23) 



(11/24) 



(11/28) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, DECEMBER 2, 1987 PAGE TWO 



APPEAL NO. 87-304 



ANTHONY LOPEZ, Appellant 
(7B) vs. 

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



RONALD J. DUMONT, Appellant 
(8) vs. 

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



SPECTRUM FOODS, INC., Appellant 
(9) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



[Revocation on October 7, 1987, 

[of Mechanical Amusement Device 

[permit at 3079 16th Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/28) 



APPEAL NO. 87-305 



[Revocation on October 7, 1987, 

[of Mechanical Amusement Device 

[permit at 1940 Taraval St. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/28) 



APPEAL NO. 87-288 



YOUNG ANN KIM & IN KYUNG KIM, 
(10) vs. Appellants 

HEALTH DEPARTMENT, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



SAN FRANCISCO BUILDING & 
CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL, 
(11) vs. Appellants 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



MARY E. HUTCHINSON, Appellant 
112) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



ROBERT M. CASSEL, Appellant 
!13A) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



ROBERT M. CASSEL, Appellant 
13B) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



"[Denial on October 1, 1987, 

[of permit to Alter a Building 

[at 617 Front Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8711396. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/22) 



APPEAL NO. 87-302 



"[Denial on October 9, 1987, 
[of permit to Operate a 
[Restaurant at 92 Judah St. 
[(Joky's Place). 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/28) 



APPEAL NO. 87-289 



[Protesting issuance on 

[October 2, 1987, to 

[Ramon Lum, permit to 

[Erect a Structure at 

[2980 & 2990 24th Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8609536. 

[CU 86.541 EC. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/22) 



APPEAL NO. 87-293 



[Protesting issuance on 

[October 9, 1987, to 

[Alexander Houston, permit 

[to Alter a Building 

[at 248 Edna Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8713433. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/24) 



APPEAL NO. 87-295 



[Protesting issuance on 

[October 6, 1987, to 

[Mr. Edgar Osgood and 

[Ms. Angela Coppola, permit 

[to Erect a Structure at 

[2747 Vallejo Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8601760. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/25) 



APPEAL NO. 87-329 



[Protesting issuance on 

[November 12, 1987, to 

[Mr. Edgar Osgood and 

[Ms. Angela Coppola, permit 

[to Demolish a Building at 

[2747 Vallejo Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8601760. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/2) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, DECEMBER 2, 1987 PAGE THREE 



APPEAL NO. 87-296 



SAN FRANCISCO BUILDING & 
CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL, 
(14A) vs. Appellants 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 

[October 6, 1987, to 

[EJM Construction, permit 

[to Erect a Structure at 

[330 Fillmore Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8705074. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/25) 



APPEAL NO. 87-297 



SAN FRANCISCO BUILDING & 
CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL, 
(14B) vs. Appellants 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 

[October 6, 1987, to 

[EJM Construction, permit 

[to Erect a Structure at 

[338 Fillmore Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8705073. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/25) 



APPEAL NO. 87-298 



SAN FRANCISCO BUILDING & 
CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL, 
(14C) vs. Appellants 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 

[October 6, 1987, to 

[EJM Construction, permit 

[to Erect a Structure at 

[346 Fillmore Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8705072. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/25) 



APPEAL NO. 87-299 



SAN FRANCISCO BUILDING & 
CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL, 
(14D) vs. Appellants 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 

[October 6, 1987, to 

[EJM Construction, permit 

[to Erect a Structure at 

[352 Fillmore Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8705071. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/25) 



APPEAL NO. 87-300 



SAN FRANCISCO BUILDING & 
CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL, 
(14E) vs. Appellants 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 

[October 6, 1987, to 

[EJM Construction, permit to 

[to Erect a Structure at 

[360 Fillmore Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8705070. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/25) 



APPEAL NO. 87-301 



MARKET STREET OPERATIONS, 
c/o EDWARD LITKE, Appellant 
(15) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 

[October 8, 1987, to 

[Golden Gate Electronics, 

[permit to Alter a Building 

[at 842 Market Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8714521. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/28) 



APPEAL NO. 87-307 



SAN FRANCISCO BUILDING & 
CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL, 
1 16A) vs. Appellants 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 

[October 14, 1987, to 

[Valentina Aurutin, permit 

[to Demolish a Building at 

[331 11th Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8708890. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/5) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, DECEMBER 2, 1987 PAGE FOUR 



APPEAL NO. 87-308 

SAN FRANCISCO BUILDING & [Protesting issuance on 

CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL, [October 14, 1987, to 

(16B) vs. Appellants [Valentina Aurutin, permit 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [to Erect a Structure at 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [331 11th Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8705088. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/2) 

APPEAL NO. 87-321 

JOHN J. MURPHY, Appellant [Protesting issuance on 

(17) vs. [November 2, 1987, to 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Steve Berkley, permit 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Erect a Structure at 

[201 Montcalm Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8614047. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/22) 

(18) PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to two minutes for each speaker. 



MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN VICE PRESIDENT 

MATTIE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

JOSE E. MEDINA COilMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the board. 

Ill the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less" ! If more time is 
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
board not later than two days before the appointed hearing . 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before their 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Kailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing 
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING 
Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a decision 
and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and 
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be made by the Board 
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a 
written request stating succinctly the grounds upon which such rehearing is requested, 
(b) If new evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show: 
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a 
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at 
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the 
previous hearing shall be deemec grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations for 
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the 
Board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is 
considered by the Board. 



Robert H Feldman C1t * and Count > of San Francisco 

Executive Director B0ARD 0F PERMIT APPEALS 

(415) 554-6720 Roorri 15A " A » Ci *y Hdl1 

San Francisco, California 94102 



mardofp: 

City Hall - 
San Fra 



.02 




<i?~<Z>&/ 



Public Library 



F 



iiAOllMS:?,"rr- Rnik., 



dU, ^C DOCUMENTS MP 

fc,/— DEC 8 1987 

4/ g 7 MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 9, 1987 D "«'-'« ' »*p*pv 

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 

;i) MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE 

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING 

ITEM A Letter from Gordon Lau, Esq., on behalf of Aquatic Park Investors, requesting 
rehearing of Appeal No. V87-271. The appellant, Kenneth M. Howard had protested 
the granting of a variance for properties at 834-848 Northpoint Street. On November 18, 
1987, the Board, upon motion of Commissioner Medina, voted 4-1 to overrule the 
Department and deny the variance. Commissioner Jackson dissented. 

ITEM B Letter from Bruce Davies, Cheryl Evans, Dennis Edelman and Marc Minardi requesting 
the Board to rehear Appeals Nos. 87-120, 87-122, 87-123, and 87-124 . The appellants 
had protested the issuance of permits to erect a structure at Nos. 2, 4, 6, and 8 
Southern Heights Avenue. On November 18, 1987, upon motion of Commissioner Fung, the 
Board voted 4-1 to uphold the department and grant the permits subject to conditions. 
Commissioner Medina dissented. 

ITEM C Letter from Broadway Tunnel Park Committee requesting rehearing of Appeal 
No. 87-240 . The appellants had protested the issuance of permit to erect a structure 
at 1483 Mason Street. On November 4, 1987, upon motion of Vice-President Engmann, 
the Board voted 4-0 to uphold the Department and grant the permit subject to conditions. 
President Berg was absent. 

ITEM D Letter from Robert W. Passmore, Zoning Administrator, requesting rehearing 
of Appeal No. V87-266 , The appellant had appealed the conditions attached to the 
granting of a variance. On November 4, 1987, the Board, upon motion of Vice-President 
Engmann, voted 4-0 to uphold the Variance and modify the conditions attached to the 
granting of the variance. President Berg was absent. 

ITEM E Letter from Joseph L. Mathews, Esq., on behalf of Van Cam Vo dba Hong Kong 
Massage, requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 87-222 . The appellant had protested the 
denial of massage establishment permit at 450-B Jones Street. On October 21, 1987, 
upon motion of Commissioner Jackson, the Board voted 4-0 to uphold the Department 
and revoke the permit. Commissioner Fung was absent. 

ITEM F Letter from Howard N. Ellman, Esq., on behalf of Pacific Avenue Neighbors, 
requesting a rehearing of Appeal No. 87-282 . The appellants had protested the 
issuance of permit to alter a building at 2961 Pacific Avenue. On November 18, 1987, 
upon motion of Commissioner Fung, the Board voted 5-0 to uphold the Department and 
grant the permit, with the finding that the project is limited to use as a 26-room 
guest house as described in Planning Code Section 209.2(a) and that it is not to 
be used as a Hotel, Inn, or Hostel as described in Section 209.2(d). 

APPEAL NO. 87-321 

JOHN J. MURPHY, Appellant [Protesting issuance on 

(2) vs. [November 2, 1987, to 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Steve Berkley, permit 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Erect a Structure at 

[201 Montcalm Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8614047. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/22) 

APPEAL NOS. 87-198, 87-199 & 87-200 

EDMUND L. JUNG, Appellant [Revocation by the San Francisco 

(3) vs. [Police Commission (Motion no. 
POLICE COMMISSION, Respondent [825-87) on July 17, 1987, of 

[three Motorized Rickshaw permits. 

[MR-1, MR-2 & MR-3. 

[FOR REHEARING TODAY. (9/2) 

APPEAL NO. 87-145 

YASHIMA CONSTRUCTION CO., Inc., [Revocation on June 3, 1987, 

YAN YAN CHU & TOP DEVELOPMENT, [of permit to Erect a Structure 

(4A) vs. Appellants [at 250 19th Avenue. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [APPLICATION NO. 8604647. 

[FOR REHEARING TODAY. (7/22) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, DECEMBER 9, 1987 PAGE TWO 



APPEAL NO. 87-146 



YASHIMA CONSTRUCTION, CO., INC., 
YAN YAN CHU & TOP DEVELOPMENT, 
'4B) vs. Appellants 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



FREDERICK SCHWARTZ, Executor, 
[5) vs. Appellant 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



(.Revocation on June 3, 1987, 

[of permit to Erect a Structure 

[at 251 18th Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8604648. 

[FOR REHEARING TODAY. (7/22) 



APPEAL NO. 86-194 



"[Denial on July 21, 1986, of 
[permit to Alter a Building at 
[60, 62, 61i§ Carmelita Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8608756. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/31) 



APPEAL NO. 86-223 



WILLIAM POWERS, Appellant 
(6) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
DAHI DISAPPROVAL 



ROSEKRANS & ASSOC. INC., 
ARCHITECTS, Appellant 
(7) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
FIRE DEPT. DISAPPROVAL 



SERENA DeBELLIS, Appellant 
(8) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



"[Denial on August 22, 1986, 
[of permit to Alter a Building 
[at 2375-2377 Francisco Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8606123. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (10/7) 



APPEAL NO. 87-320 



[Denial on November 10, 1987, 

[of permit to Alter a Building 

[at 100-34th Avenue. 

[(Legion of Honor Museum). 

[APPLICATION NO. 8712792. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/20) 



APPEAL NO. 87-251 



[Protesting issuance on 

[September 15, 1987, to 

[Johnson Wong, permit to 

[Erect a Structure at 

[150 Bepler Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8706946. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (10/28) 



APPEAL NO. 87-315 



SONDRA SCHLADE, Appellant 
(9) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 

[October 26, 1987, to 

[Russell Shaw, permit to 

[Demolish a Building at 

[456 Missouri Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8713354. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/13) 



APPEAL NO. 87-316 



WEYLAND LUM, Appellant 
(10) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 

[October 26, 1987, to 

[Joan Drury, permit to 

[Alter a Building at 

[1981 B Funston Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8709263. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/14) 



APPEAL NO. 87-318 



ELLEN MENDELSON & 
CHARLES MAHER, Appellants 
(11) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 

[November 9, 1987, to 

[Gregory Locher, permit 

[to Alter a Building at 

[481 Bella Vista Way. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8713044. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/19) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, DECEMBER 9, 1987 PAGE THREE 



APPEAL NO. 87-319 

DANIEL QUATTRIN, Appellant [Protesting issuance on 

12) vs. [October 29, 1987, to 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Enola Maxwell, permit 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Alter a Building 

[at 953 DeHaro Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8710679. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/19) 

APPEAL WO. 87-309 

COCOLAT, INC., Appellant [Order to Cease and Desist 

13) vs. [on October 15, 1987, from 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [the use and the violations 

[at 4106 -24th Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/2) 

APPEAL WO. 87-310 

JOHN BREMNER, Appellant [Conditions imposed by 

14) vs. [the Zoning Administrator 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [on October 13, 1987, on 

[a Health Department permit 

[for a retail bakery at 

[40 Clement Street. 

[HEALTH DEPT. NO. B10081. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/2) 

APPEAL NO. V87-311 

LOIS DE MARTINI & TDenial on October 16, 1987, 

EARL & VERNEL BRUSCHINI, [of an Off-Street Variance 

15) vs. Appellants [sought for property at 
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [2329 - 2331 Francisco St. 

[VARIANCE CASE NO. 87.405V. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/5) 

APPEAL WO. 87-313 

MAURICE FRANCO, M.D., Appellant [Protesting issuance on 

16) vs. [October 22, 1987, to 
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Angelo Piccinini, permit 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Alter a Building at 

[126 Alhambra Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8706967. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/12) 

17) PUBLIC COMMEWT: Presentation shall be limited to two minutes for each speaker. 



MEMBERS Or THF BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

^ — — ^— — — .^— — — — — ——~ 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANK VICE PRESIDENT 

MATTIE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

JOSE E. MEDINA COMMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVIN! - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899 

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION E 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taker 
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed 
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less . 11 more time is 
oeemec necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
Board not later than two oays before the appointed hearing . 

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing. 

Lach member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before then 
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority 
of the members present. {Amended February 5, 19B6) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be 
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearing. 

Kailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
beys prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a 
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearinc 
roon., no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at 
554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING 
Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a decision 
and may be filed only by principals In the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and 
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be made by the Board 
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a 
written request stating succinctly the grounds upon which such rehearing is requested. 
(b) If new evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show: 
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a 
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at 
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the 
previous hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations for 
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the 
board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is 
considered by the Board. 



Robert h. Feldmar. 
Executive Director 
(415) 554-6720 



City and County of San Francisco 

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

Room 154 -A, City Hall 

San Francisco, California 9A1D2 







0~C<Z^ 



Public Library 



SP 
P30 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

WEDNESDAY" DECEMBER 16, 1987 

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 



DOCUMENTS DEPT. 

Dig 161987 
San i-KMft6itfG0 

PUBLIC URRABV 



1) MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUEST FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE. 



APPEAL NO. 87-321 



JOHN J. MURPHY, Appellant 
I) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 

[November 2, 1987, to 

[Steve Berkley, permit 

[to Erect a Structure at 

[201 Montcalm Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8614047. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/22) 



APPEAL NO. 85-245 



LASZLO STRASSER, Appellant 
3) vs. 

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent 



[Revocation on 

[September 25, 1985, of 

[Street Photographer permit 

[at 2801 Jones Street. 

[REMANDED FROM SUPERIOR COURT. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/4) 



FRED LECH, Appellant 
*) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 87-325 



TAppealing for refund 
[of penalty imposed on 
[November 18, 1987, for 
[work at 2166 Market St. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8715611 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(12/28) 



APPEAL NO. 87-191 



RICHARD P. LIEBERMAN, Appellant 
) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
DAHI DISAPPROVAL 



"[Denial on July 15, 1987, of 
[permit to Alter a Building 
[at 620 Jones Street. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8601149. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. 



(8/30) 



APPEAL NO. 87-241 



MICHAEL SHAPOSHNIKOV, Appellant 
6) vs. 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL 



[Denial on September 8, 1987, 

[of permit to Erect a Structure 

[at 133 Vicksburg Street. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8706987. 

[Motion No. 11117; 

[File No. 87.377D. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (10/18) 



APPEAL NO. 87-322 



MINNIE SWARTZ & LIBBY GROSS, 
7) vs. Appellants 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent 
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL 



[Protesting issuance on 

[November 6, 1987, to 

[Shigeo Katsuyama, permit 

[to Alter a Building at 

[2506-16th Avenue. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8700394. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/26) 



WILLIAM & TRUDY DRYPOLCHER, 
3) vs. Appellants 

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent 



APPEAL NO. 87-323 



[Order to Cease Violation 

[of the Planning Code dated 

[November 5, 1987, for property 

[located at 4200 17th Street. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/26) 



MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, DECEMBER 16, 1987 PAGE TWO 



APPEAL NO. 87-285 

GERDA KAINZ, Appellant [Protesting issuance on 

9A) vs. [September 29, 1987, to 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [William Spiers, permit 

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Erect a Structure at 

[216 Roosevelt Way. 

[APPLICATION NO. 8615272. 

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/18) 

APPEAL NO. 87-286 

GERDA KAINZ, Appellant [Protesting issuance on 

9B) vs. [September 29, 1987, to 

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [John Lau, permit to 

[Alter a Building at 
[218 Roosevelt Way. 
[APPLICATION NO. 8712603. 
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/17) 



10) PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to two minutes by each speaker. 



MEMBERS CF TH r BOARD 0- PERMIT APPEALS 

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT 

D0U5LAS J. BKGHANK VICE PRESIDENT 

MATT I l J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER 

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER 

JOSE E. MEDIRA COilMISSIONER 

DORIS LEVIN! - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9B9S 

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER 
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER 

BOARD Or PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of 
the Department, Board, Commission or person froir whose order the appeal is taker, 
shall open the discussion. Tne appellant shall then present his or her case. 
Rebuttal or closing remarks may oe made by either party only in exceptional 
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board. 

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first. 

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for eacjh side shell not exceed 
fifteen minutes, o r ten minutes per person, whichever is less . 11 more time is 
oeemec necessary , sucr, arguments must be made in writing, and received by the 
boarc not later than two oays before the appointee! hearinc . 

The Boarc shell consioer tne departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be 
received by the boarc no later tnan two days prior to the appointed hearinc. 

Lacr. roemoer present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before then 
unless a Commissioner is excused froir voting by t motion adopted by t majority 
of the members present. (Amended Feoruary E, 19B6) (Emphasis added) 

SPECIAL NOTES 

Pursuant to the board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writinc must be 
received by opposing parties and oepartments as well as by the Board not later than 
two days before the hearinc. The Board will not consider written material submitted 
less than two days before the hearinc. 

Kailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five 
oays prior tc the oete of hearinc. In the event that a matter is continued to e 
specific date by tne presiding officer and announced tc tne parties in the hearinc 
rooc, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the board office at 
554-6721 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours. 

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING 
Written requests for rehearing must be filed withm ten days froir the date of a decision 
and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and 
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be made by the Board 
except upon the following conditions: (a) Tne applicant for the rehearing shall submit a 
written reauest stating succinctly tne grounds upon whicn suet rehearing is requested. 
(b) If ne* evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show 
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a 
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Wny the evidence was not produced at 
the original hearinc. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the 
previous hearing shall be deeaed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations fj 
requests for rehearing shall be in writing,, and it shall be the general practice of the 
fcoard that no verbal testimony shell be recieved when such request for rehearing is 
considered by the Board. 



Robert H. Feldman 
Executive Director 
«15) 554-6720 



City and County of San Francisco 

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 

kooir 154 -A, City Hall 

Sari Francisco. California 9Cin? 



BOARD CF PERMIT APPEALS 

City Hcli - Room 154-A 

San Fiar.cisco, CA 94102 






Public Library 



>