Full text of "[Agenda]"

See other formats

ff/S

San Francisco Public Library

Government Information Center
San Francisco Public Library
100 Larkin Street, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 941 02

REFERENCE BOOK

Not to be taken from the Library

Digitized by the Internet Archive

in 2013

http://archive.org/details/agenda198889sanf

^LAGEMDfla J&l . DC EP7

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF, PERMIT APPEALS DEC 3 1 1937

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 6,1988 SAN FRANCJ

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282/ CITY HALL pvzuz lssraj

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUEST FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

ITEM A Letter from Robert W. Passmore, Zoning Administrator, requesting rehearing
of Appeal No. 87-310. The appellant, John Bremner, had appealed the conditions
imposed by the Zoning Administrator on October 13, 1987, on a Health Department permit
for a retail bakery at 40 Clement Street. On December 9, 1987, upon motion of
Commissioner Fung, the Board voted 4-0 to delete the Zoning Administrator's
conditions. (Vice President Engmann was absent from the hearing.)

ITEM B Letter from Ellen Mendelson requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 87-318.
The appellant had protested the issuance of a permit to alter a building at
481 Bella Vista Way. On December 9, 1987, upon motion of Commissioner Fung, the
Board voted 4-0 to uphold the department and grant the permit. (Vice-President
Engmann was absent,)

ITEM C Letter from Robert M. Cassel requesting a rehearing of Appeal No. 87-329.
The appellant, Robert M. Cassel, had protested the issuance of a demolition permit
for a building at 2747 Vallejo Street. On December 2, 1987, upon motion of President
Berg, the Board voted 5-0 to uphold the department and grant the permit.

ITEM D Letter from Robert M. Cassel requesting a rehearing of Appeal No. 87-295.
Ihe appellant, Robert M. Cassel, had protested the issuance of a permit to erect
a structure at 2747 Vallejo Street. On December 2, 1987, upon motion of President
Berg, the Board voted 5-0 to uphold the department and grant the permit.

ITEM E Letter from the San Francisco Building & Construction Trades Council requesting
rehearing on Appeals Nos. 87-296, 87-297, 87-298, 87-299 and 87-300. The appellant :
had protested the issuance of permits for construction at 360 Fillmore Street, 338
Fillmore Street, 352 Fillmore Street, 346 Fillmore Street, and 330 Fillmore Street.
On December 2, 1987, upon motion of Commissioner Fung, the Board voted 5-0 to uphold
the department and grant the permits.

ITEM F Letter from Lois Behnke, President of American Canvas Products, on behalf of
appellants William & Trudy Drypolcher, requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 87-323.
The appellants protested the Zoning Administrator's order to cease violation of the
Planning Code for property located at 4200-1 7th Street. On December 16, 1987, upon
motion of President Berg, the Board voted 4-0 to uphold the Zoning Administrator's
Order. (Commissioner Jackson was absent.)

ITEM G Letter from Paul Zentner requesting the Board to take Jurisdiction over
building permit issued for construction of building at 938 Santiago Street.

Permit issued November 30, 1987

Appeal period ended December 10, 1987

Request for jurisdiction received December 23, 1987

FOR ADOPTION OF FINDINGS ONLY. Public hearing closed (ITEM H only).

ITEM H Appeals Nos. 87-145 and 87-146. Permits to erect structures at 250-1 9th Avenue
and 251-1 8th Avenue. Hearing held December 9, 1987. On motion to uphold department's
revocation by Vice President Engmann, the Board voted 4-1 (Commissioner Jackson to
overrule) to uphold the department.

ITEM I Letter from John Lane concerning findings for Appeal No. 87-171 . On November 18,
1987, the Board voted 5-0 to overrule the Planning Commission and grant alteration permit
for a rooftop addition to Dave Rawson of 2744 Green Street. On December 2, 1987, the Board
adopted findings in this matter, 5-0.

ITEM J Letter from C.A. Taylor requesting the Board to take Jurisdiction over projects
at 700 Persia/503 Vienna. Building permits for housing at 501, 503 and 505 Vienna were
issued on December 4, 1987. The permits were not appealed. The last day to appeal them
was December 14, 1987.

3 1223 06446 4382

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, JANUARY 6, 1988
ADDENDUM ITEMS (Continued)

PAGE TWO

ITEM K Letter from John J. Murphy requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 87-321. The
appellant had protested the issuance of a permit to erect a structure at 201
Montcalm Street. On December 16, 1987, upon motion of President Berg, the Board voted
4-0 to uphold the department and grant the permit. (Commissioner Jackson was absent.)

APPEAL NO. 87-327

LOREN A. DRAZNIN, Appellant
2) vs.

POLICE DEPT., Respondent

DON MCCLELLAND, Appellant
3) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

APPEAL NO. 87-343

APPEAL NO. 87-016

DON D. DURHAM, Appellant
4A) vs.

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent

APPEAL NO. 87-071

DON D. DURHAM, Appellant
4B) vs.

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent

APPEAL NO. 87-265

WOON HING LEE, Appellant
5) vs.

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent

APPEAL NO. 87-281

WILLIAM SIMPICH, Appellant
6) vs.

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent

APPEAL NO. 87-326

DANIEL BACON, Appellant
7) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

Denial on November 10, 1987,

of Driver Public Vehicle permit.

FOR HEARING TODAY.

(12/30)

Appeal ing for refund
of penalty imposed on
November 18, 1987, for
work done at 80 Pierce Street,
APPLICATION NO. 8713804.
FOR HEARING TODAY.

Order to Cease Violation
of the Planning Code dated
January 16, 1987, for property
located at 405 24th Avenue.
FOR HEARING TODAY.

Order to Cease Violation
of the Planning Code dated
March 13, 1987, for properties
located at 2301 Clement Street,
2315 Clement Street and
2309 Clement Street.
FOR HEARING TODAY.

Order to Cease and Desist
on September 18, 1987, trom
the use and the violations
at 3164 Sacramento Street.
(Dry Cleaning Processing
Operation) .
FOR HEARING TODAY.

Determination on
September 28, 1987, that the
Department of City Planning
would not accept a variance
application for property at
1019 Ashbury Street.
FOR HEARING TODAY.

Protesting issuance on
November 13, 1987, to
Fred Cohen and Carolyn
Klebanoff, permit to
Erect a Structure at
767 Rhode Island Street.
APPLICATION NO. 8705897
FOR HEARING TODAY.

(1/11)

(3/31)

(5/2)

(11/7)

(11/17)

(12/30)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, JANUARY 6, 1988 PAGE THREE

APPEAL NO. 87-328

ALBERT E. BENJAMIN, JR. &
CAROL E. GAMBLE, Appellants
8) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[November 13, 1987, to
[Nelson C. Barry III, permit
[to Alter a Building at
[32 Sussex Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8704574.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

APPEAL NO. 87-333

NEIL D. CHAITIN, Appellant
9) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[November 12, 1987, to
[Peter & Deborah Magowan,
[permit to Alter a Building
[at 2760 Divisadero Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8714061.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

APPEAL NO. 87-335

LOURDAN KIMBRELL &
CHARLES DUMENIL, Appellants
10) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[November 16, 1987, to
[Franklin Scarlatia, permit
[to Alter a Building at
[1009 Guerrero Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8711545.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

APPEAL NO. 87-342

MILTON MURAYAMA, Appellant
11) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[November 25, 1987, to
[G/B Contractors, permit to
[Erect a Structure at
[5575 Diamond Heights Blvd.
[APPLICATION NO. 8702560.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(1/2)

(1/9)

(1/10)

APPEAL NO. 87-334

CARL H. ERNST, JR.,
12) vs.

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR,

Appellant
Respondent

[Order to Cease Violation
[of the Planning Code dated
[November 20, 1987, for
[property located at
[889-891 Vermont Street.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(1/9)

13) PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to two minutes for each speaker

2 50351
45 SFPL

SFPL: ECONO JRS
04/09/04 132

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN VICE PRESIDENT

MATT IE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER

JOSE E. MEDINA COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case.
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board.

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first.

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less. If more time is
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the
Board not later than two days before the appointed hearing.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before them
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added)

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than
two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material submitted
less than two days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at
554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING
Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a decision
and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be made by the Board
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a
written request stating succinctly the grounds upon which such rehearing is requested,
(b) If new evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show:
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the
previous hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations fo
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the
Board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is
considered by the Board.

RnhPrt h Foir»m=r, Cl"ty and County of San Francisco

Executive Di^r ^Of PERMIT APPEALS

(415) 554-6720 Room 154-A, City Hall

San Francisco, California 94102

R20 ■

i/ie/8S

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS
WEDNESDAY," JANUARY 13, 1988
5;Q0 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL

DOCUMENTS DEPT.

JAM 13 1988

SAN FKANCISCO

PI IQI ir*. • IQD n r>v

1) MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUEST FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE

REQUEST FOR REHEARING

ITEM A Letter from Robert W. Passmore, Zoning Administrator, requesting rehearing of
Appeal No. 86-194. The appellant, Frederick Schwartz, had appealed the denial of
permit to alter a building at 60, 62, 62| Carmelita Street. On December 9, 1987,
upon motion of Vice-President Engmann, the Board voted 4-1 (Jackson) to uphold the
department and deny the permit subject to conditions allowing the present tenant to
remain for ten years.

REQUESTS FOR THE BOARD TO TAKE JURISDICTION BEYOND THE 10-DAY APPEAL PERIOD

ITEMS B, C, AND D Letters from Jack L. Blinzler, Marilyn Mir, Michael and Linda Clark
requesting the Board to take Jurisdiction over building permit issued for construction
at 35 Hillcrest Court.

Permit issued

Appeal period ended

Request for jurisdiction received

December 2, 1987

December 14, 1987

January 6, 1988 (Blinzler & Clark)

January 7, 1988 (Mir)

APPEAL NO. 87-227

JIM ILNICKI, Appellant
2) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[August 7, 1987, to
[Jose Murrillo, permit
[to Erect a Structure
[at 220 Peralta Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8504983,
[FOR REHEARING TODAY.

(9/23)

APPEAL NO. 87-364

SHELDON H. SUSKAUER, &
BARBARA J. DWYER, Appellants
3) vs.

DEPT PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Appealing for refund
[of penalty imposed on
[December 15, 1987, for
[work at 170 Bonview St.
[APPLICATION NO. 8717558
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(1/26)

APPEAL NO. 87-336

SAN FRANCISCO BUILDING &
CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL,
4A) vs. Appellants

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[November 19, 1987, to
[Sam Raiter, permit to
[Demolish a Building at
[175 Wood Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8712505
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(1/9)

SAN FRANCISCO BUILDING &
CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL,
4B) vs. Appellant

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 87-337

[Protesting issuance on
[November 19, 1987, to
[Sam Raiter, permit to
[Erect a Structure at
[175 Wood Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8712506
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(1/9)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, JANUARY 13, 1988 PAGE TWO

APPEAL NO. 87-339

SAN FRANCISCO BUILDING &
CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL,
(5) vs. Appellant

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[November 18, 1987, to
[Luis So, permit to
[Alter a Building at
[3127 Anza Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8705131
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(1/9)

(6)

SAN FRANCISCO BUILDING &
CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL,

vs. Appellant
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 87-341

[Protesting issuance on
[November 19, 1987, to
[Yori Gerzoy, permit to
[Demolish a Building at
[218-18th Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8708859
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(1/9)

APPEAL NO. 87-349

SAN FRANCISCO BUILDING &
CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL,
(7) vs. Appellants

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[November 25, 1987, to
LMel Murphy, permit to
[Erect a Structure at
[1259 Oak Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8707230
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(1/16;

APPEAL NO. 87-345

(8)

CHARLES M. VADALABENE,

vs. Appellant
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[November 30, 1987, to
[Nadine & Harry Wright,
[permit to Erect a Structure
[at 938 Santiago Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8711191.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(l/i:

APPEAL NO. 87-347

(9)

TIMOTHY ARNSTEIN, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[December 1, 1987, to
[Gene Chen, permit to
[Alter a Building at
[1246-1248 Lombard Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8707809.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(1/16

APPEAL NO. 87-348

HOWARD & MAUREEN SCHAADT,
& JEANNE GOLDMAN, Appellants
(10) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[November 25, 1987, to
[Diane Mei-Ling So, permit
[to Alter a Building at
[1836 Pacheco Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8710849.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(1/16

11) PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to two minutes for each speaker.

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN VICE PRESIDENT

MATT IE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER

JOSE E. MEDINA COM SSI ONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Kailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at
554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING
Written requests for rehearing must be filed witbir. ten days from the date of a decision
and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be made by the Board
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a
written request stating succinctly the grounds upon which such rehearing is requested,
(b) If new evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show:
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the
previous hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations for
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the
Board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is
considered by the Board.

Bftkov>f ,, - , . City and County of San Francisco

Exe i e Di ec?or «°ftRD °F PERMIT APPEALS

(415) 554-6720 Ro™ 154"A' Cit* Ha11

H»j &M-67Z0 San Francisco> California 94102

PPEALS

: 154-A
San FiancUo, CA 94102

(h££^

JJJX-UBRARIAIj-r
Public Library

MEETING OF THE BOARD 0R=PERMIT APPFALS DOCUMENTS DEPT.

pgQ WEDNESDAY^JANUARY 20. 19SS , g x 1988

* 2 5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HAM

t **. SAN KKHlMCio-UO

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUEST FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE

FOR ADOPTION OF FINDINGS ONLY. Public hearing closed.

ITEM A Appeals Nos. 87-198, 87-199, and 87-200. Revocation of permits to operate three
motorized Rickshaws. Hearing held on December 9, 1987. Upon motion to overrule the
department's revocation by Commissioner Jackson, the Board voted 3-2 (Berg and Engmann)
to overrule the department and reinstate the permits. Four votes are needed to overrule.
The department was upheld and the permits revoked.

REQUEST FOR REHEARING.

ITEM B Letter from Loren Draznin requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 87-327. The appellant
had protested denial of permit to drive a public vehicle. Hearing held January 6, 1988.
Upon motion to uphold the department's denial by Commissioner Fung, the Board voted 3-1
(Engmann) to uphold the department and deny the permit. (Commissioner Jackson was absent.)

REQUEST FOR THE BOARD TO TAKE JURISDICTION BEYOND THE 10-DAY APPEAL PERIOD.

ITEM C Letter from Phyllis Schrobsddorff requesting the Board to take Jurisdiction over
the Zoning Administrator's denial of a variance for property at 182 Arguello Boulevard.

Denial letter dated December 1, 1987

Appeal period ended December 11, 1987

Request for jurisdiction received January 12, 1988

ITEM D Letter from John and Lillian Kramer requesting the Board to take Jurisdiction
over building permits issued for construction at 35 Hillcrest Court and 9 Hillcrest
Court.

Permits issued (35 Hillcrest Court) December 2, 1987

( 9 Hillcrest Court) December 23, 1987

Appeal period ended (35 Hillcrest Court) December 14, 1987

( 9 Hillcrest Court) January 4, 1988

Request for jurisdiction received January 13, 1988

APPEAL NO. 87-342

MILTON MURAYAMA, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

(2) vs. [November 25, 1987, to
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [G/B Contractors, permit to
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Erect a Structure at

[5575 Diamond Heights Boulevard.

[APPLICATION NO. 8702560.

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (1/10)

APPEAL W0. 87-348

HOWARD & MAUREEN SCHAADT, [Protesting issuance on

& JEANNE GOLDMAN, Appellants [November 25, 1987, to

(3) vs. [Diane Mei-Ling So, permit
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [to Alter a Building at
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [1836 Pacheco Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8710849.

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (1/16)

APPEAL NO. V87-271

KENNETH M. HOWARD, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

(4) vs. [September 22, 1987, to
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [Aquatic Park Investors,

[Rear Yard and Usable Open

[Space Variances sought

[for property located at

[834-848 North Point Street.

[VARIANCE CASE NO. 87.265V.

[FOR REHEARING TODAY. (11/11)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, JANUARY 20, 1988 PAGE TWO

APPEAL NO. 87-358

CINDY J. WASELESKI, Appellant [Suspension on

(5) vs. [December 9, 1987, of
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent [Driver Public Vehicle

i [permit.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/20)

APPEAL NO. 87-324
WILLIAM CHU, Appellant [Denial on November 9, 1987,

(6) vs. [of permit to operate a
DEPT. PUBLIC HEALTH, Respondent [Rice Storage Warehouse
FIRE DEPT. APPROVAL [at 531 Jessie Street.

CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL [FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/28)

APPEAL NO. 87-350

ERICA COWAN & JOAN FLORENCE, [Protesting issuance on

(7) vs. Appellants [November 30, 1987, to
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Neil Cotter, permit to
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Erect a Structure at

[1254 18th Avenue.

[APPLICATION NO. 8708695.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/17)

APPEAL NO. 87-351

THE TENANTS, [Protesting issuance on

c/o PENNY BROGDEN, Appellants [November 30, 1987, to

(8) vs. [Grant Green Partnership
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [permit to Alter a Building
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [at 1416 Grant Avenue.

[APPLICATION NO. 8713104.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/17)

APPEAL NO. 87-352

LOUIS J. ARTAL, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

(9) vs. [November 30, 1987, to
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [to Paul Walti, permit
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Alter a Building at

[275 Burnett Avenue.

[APPLICATION NO. 8715536.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/17)

APPEAL NO. 87-355

TIM MOLINARE, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

(10) vs. [December 2, 1987, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Pedro Rivera, permit to

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Erect a Structure at

[144 Cortland Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8610446.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/19)

APPEAL NO. 87-357

JOHN J. MURPHY, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

ill) vs. [December 4, 1987, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Cooke & McCann, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Erect a Structure

[at 207 Montcalm Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8707500.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/20)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, JANUARY 20, 1988 PAGE THREE

APPEAL NO. 88-001

WILLIAM C. JOHNS, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

12) vs. [December 22, 1987, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Northpoint Investors,

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [permit to Alter a Building

[at 2351 Powell Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8716586.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/13)

[13) PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to two minutes for each speaker.

[14) Annual election of Officers.

MEMBERS Or THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN VICE PRESIDENT

MATT IE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER

JOSE E. MEDINA COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of
the Department, Board, Commission or person froir, whose order the appeal is taken
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case.
Rebuttal or closing remarks »ay be made by either party only in exceptional
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board.

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first.

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is less. If more time is
deemed necessary, such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the
board not later than two days before the appointed hearing.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before then
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority
of the members present. (Amended February 5, 1986) (Emphasis added)

SPECIAL NOTES

Kailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to e
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at
554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING
Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a decision
and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be made by the Board
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a
written request stating succinctly the grounds upon which such rehearing is requested,
(b) If new evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show:
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the
previous hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations for
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the
Board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is
considered by the Board.

R^Kor-t u c*ia City and County of San Francisco

^JrL n-ldm!n BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director : 7,w . rit„ Hall

/mc\ cca r75n Room 1S4-A, City Hall

(415) 554-6720 $an Frdncisco> California 94102

board of ?mm appeals

City m 154-A

San Francisco, CA 94102

etHJ-IBRAEIAN
Public Library

^ MEETING OF THE BOARD OFPERMIT APPEALS

U WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 27, I98E JAN 2 6 1088

^nn p.r. . Rnrw ?£?. pity ham

REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUEST FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE
REQUESTS FOR REHEARING:

ITEM A Letter frorr. Carl H. Ernst, Jr. requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 87-334. The
appellant had appealed the order of the Zoning Administrator to Cease Violation of the
Planning Code for property located at 889-891 Vermont Street. On January 6, 19BE, upon
motion of President berg, the Board voted 4-0 to uphold the Zoning Administrator's order.
Commissioner Jackson was absent.

jTEK E Letter from Paul K. Karigonda, Esq., on behalf of Lourdan Kimbrell and Charles
Uumern 1 , reauesting rehearing of Appeal No. 87-335. The appellants had appealed the
issuance to Dr. Franklin Scarlata of a permit to alter a building at 1009 Guerrero Street
On January C, 1981, the Board voted 4-0 to uphold the department and grant the permit.
Commissioner JacKson was absent.

FOR ADOPTION OF FINDINGS ONLY. Public hearing closed.

ITEM C Appeals Nos. 87-198, 87-199, and 87-200. Revocation of permits to operate three
motorized Rickshaws, hearing held on December 9, 1987. Upon motion to overrule the
department's revocation by Commissioner Jackson, the board voted 3-2 (berg and Engmann)
to overrule thE department and reinstate the permits. Four votes are needed to overrule.
The department was upheld and the permits revoked.

APPEAL NO. 87-227

JIM ILNICKI, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

vs. [August 7, 1987, to

DEPT PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Jose Murrillo, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Erect a Structure

[at 220 Peralta Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8504983.

[FOR REHEARING TODAY. (9/23)

APPEAL NO. 87-322

MINNIE SWARTZ & L1BBY GROSS, [Protesting issuance on

) vs. Appellants [November 6, 1987, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Shigeo Katsuyama, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Alter a Building at

[2506-16th Avenue.

[APPLICATION NO. 8700394.

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (12/26)

APPEAL NO. 87-285

GERDA KAINZ, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

vs. [September 29, 1987, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [William Spiers, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Erect a Structure at

[216 Roosevelt Way.

[APPLICATION NO. 8615272.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/18)

APPEAL NO. 87-286

GERDA KAINZ, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

vs. [September 29, 1987, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [John Lau, permit to

[Alter a Building at

[218 Roosevelt Way.

[APPLICATION NO. 8712603.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/18)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, JANUARY 27, 1988 PAGE TWO

APPEAL NO. 87-333

NEIL D. CHAITIN, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[November 12, 1987, to
[Peter & Deborah Magowan,
[permit to Alter a Building
[at 2760 Divisadero Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8714061.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(1/2)

APPEAL NO. 87-359

PATRICIA ARMSTRONG, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL

[Denial on December 1, 1987,
[of permit to Alter a Building
[at 161 Prentiss Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8713534.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(1/20)

APPEAL NO. 87-360

INNER SUNSET ACTION COMMITTEE,

vs. Appellant
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[December 1, 1987, to
[Frank Cafferkey, permit
[Demolish a Building
[at 1254 17th Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8713056
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(1/20)

ELIZABETH BURTON, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 87-361

[Protesting issuance on
[December 4, 1987, to
[Michael Joyce, permit to
[Erect a Structure at
[709 Foerster Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8713357,
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(1/23)

APPEAL NO. 87-362

HENRY & LAURA FRANKEL,

vs. Appellants
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[December 7, 1987 to
[Peter Johnson, permit
[to Alter a Building at
[227 El Camino Del Mar.
[APPLICATION NO. 8713503,
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(1/26)

APPEAL NO. 87-363

)

GEORGE D. KARALIS, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[December 7, 1987, to
[Peter Johnson, permit
[to Alter a Building at
[227 El Camino Del Mar.
[APPLICATION NO. 8713503.
[FOR HEARING JANUARY 27, 1987

(1/27)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, JANUARY 27, 1988 PAGE THREE

/ ^EAL NO. 87-365

MYRTLE S. ELLIOTT, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

)) vs. • [December 11, 1987, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Malcolm Cravens, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Erect a Structure at

[2545 Vallejo Street.

[CPC 86.623D.

[APPLICATION NO. 8604099.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/22)

APPEAL NO. 87-390

MICHAEL ACKERMAN, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

) vs. [December 21, 1987, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Roshani Engineer-Nash,

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [permit to Alter a Building

[at 153 Prospect Avenue.

[APPLICATION NO. 8713045.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/6)

!) PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to two minutes for each speaker.

MEMBERS 0~ THE BOARD Or PERMIT APPEALS

JERRY E. BERG ■ PRESIDENT

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN VICE PRESIDENT

MATT IE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER I

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER

JOSE E. MEDINA COMMISSIONER |

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 45C-9B9S

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER

BOARD Of PERKIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of
the Department, Board, Commission or person froir whose order the appeal is taker
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case.
Rebuttal or closing remarks »ay be made by either party only in exceptional
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board.

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speaL first.

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed
fifteen minutes, oy ten minutes per persor. , whichever is less. If more time is
oeemec necessary , suet arguments must Pe maoe in writing, ane received by the
board not later than two Pays oefore the appointee hearing. .

The faoarc shall consider the departmental letter oeemed as reac, anc such must be
received by the board nc later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before then
unless a Commissioner is excused frorr, voting by a motion adopted by a majority
of the memoers present. (Amended February 5, 19B6) (Emphasis added)

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the board not later than
two days before the hearing. The board will not consider written material submitted
less than two days before the hearing.

ttailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
cays prior to the oate of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to e
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing
roor., no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the board office at
554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING
Written requests for rehearing must oe filed within ten days from the date of a decision
and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be made by the board
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a
written reauest stating succinctly the grounds upon which such rehearing is requested.
(b) If ne* evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show:
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the
previous hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations foi
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the
board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is
considered by the Board.

L.kBrt v r-. City and County of San Francisco
Robert K. Feldman > Dr pERK]T AppLALS

Executive Director , ; Ut , nt, u*n

(4ic\ cc/ f7?ri Rooir 154-A, City Hall

/Caejqj."| ^I-Lqnd

V-Wl uiooy - ||bh M
SlWddV l!WU3d JO ouvoa

u o DOCUMENTS DEPT

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS Tt

WEDNESDAY: FEBRUARY 10, 1988 L l 1988

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL 2t51..S*fKg«??

jio/se

) MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUEST FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE
REQUEST FOR REHEARING:

ITEM A Letter from Robert W. Passmore, Zoning Administrator, requesting a rehearing
of Appeal No. 87-355. The appellant, Tim Molinare, had appealed the issuance on
December 2, 1987, to Pedro Rivera, permit to erect a structure at 144 Cortland
Avenue. On January 20, 1988, upon motion of Vice President Engmann, the Board voted
3-2 to overrule the dept and deny the permit. Four votes needed to overrule, the permit
was granted. (Jackson and Medina dissented.)

ITEM B Letter from Robert A. Jones, Esq. on behalf of the appellant, San Francisco
Building and Construction Trades Council, requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 87-336
protesting issuance of permit for demolition of a building at 175 Wood Street; Appeal
No. 87-337 protesting issuance of permit to erect a structure at 175 Wood Street; Appeal
No. 87-339 protesting issuance of permit to alter a building at 3127 Anza Street; and
Appeal No. 87-349 protesting issuance of permit to erect a structure at 1259 Oak Street.

On January 13, 1988, upon motions of President Berg, the Board voted 5-0 to uphold the
department and grant the above noted permits.

ITEM C Letter from William C. Johns requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 88-001. The
appellant, Mr. Johns, had protested the issuance of permit to alter a building at
2351 Powell Street. On January 20, 1988, upon motion of President Berg, the Board
voted 5-0 to uphold the department and grant the permit.

ITEM D Letter from Louis J. Artal requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 87-352. The
appellant, Mr. Artal, protested the issuance of permit to alter a building at 275
Burnett Avenue. On January 20, 1988, upon motion of Commissioner Fung, the Board
voted 5-0 to uphold the department and grant the permit.

ITEM E Request from Charles M. Vadalabene requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 87-345.
The appellant, Mr. Vadalabene, had protested the issuance of permit to erect a
structure at 938 Santiago Street. On January 13, 1988, upon motion of President
Berg, the Board voted 5-0 to uphold the department and grant the permit.

FOR ADOPTION OF FINDINGS ONLY: Public hearing closed.

ITEM F Appeal No. 87-390. Granting of a permit to alter a building at 153 Prospect
Avenue. Hearing held on January 27, 1988. Upon motion of Commissioner Fung the
Board voted 5-0 to uphold the department and grant the permit subject to conditions.

APPEAL NO. 87-227

JIM ILNICKI, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

vs. [August 7, 1987, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Jose Murillo, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Erect a Structure

[at 220 Peralta Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8504983.

[FOR FURTHER REHEARING TODAY. (9/23)

APPEAL NO. 87-361

ELIZABETH BURTON, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

I) vs. [December 4, 1987, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Michael Joyce, permit to

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Erect a Structure at

[709 Foerster Street.

[APPLICATION 'NO. 8713357.

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (1/23)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, FEBRUARY 10, 1988 PAGE TWO

APPEAL NO. 87-362

HENRY & LAURA FRANKEL, [Protesting issuance on

4A) vs. Appellants [December 7, 1987, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Peter Johnson, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Alter a Building at

[227 El Camino Del Mar.

[APPLICATION NO. 8713503.

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (1/26)

APPEAL NO. 87-363

GEORGE D. KARALIS, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

4B) vs. [December 10, 1987, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Peter Johnson, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Alter a Building at

[227 El Camino Del Mar.

[APPLICATION NO. 8713503.

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (1/27)

APPEAL NO. 87-392

CHONG SULLIVAN, Appellant [Revocation on

5) vs. [December 22, 1987, of

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent [of Masseuse permit.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/9)

APPEAL NO. 88-002

DANIEL ESQUIVEL, Appellant [Denial on December 24, 1987

6) vs. [of Driver Public Vehicle

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent [permit.

[(Yellow Cab Company)

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/13)

APPEAL NO. 88-003

DEARCH, INC., Appellant [Denial on January 4, 1988, of

7) vs. [permit to Alter a Building at

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [472-474 Grove Street.

CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8712745.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/14)

APPEAL NO. 87-371

JON TOLSON, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

8) vs. [December 15, 1987, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Rick Swig, permit to

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Alter a Building at

[175 29th Avenue.

[APPLICATION NO. 8609301.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/31)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, FEBRUARY 10, 1988

PAGE THREE

APPEAL NO. 87-372

JESSIE WEINBERGER, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[December 16, 1987, to
[William Courtney, permit
[to Alter a Building at
[600 Alvarado Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8716402
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(1/31)

APPEAL NO. 87-391

CARROLL PETERSON, Appellant
10) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[December 18, 1987, to
[Robert Arndt, permit
[to Alter a Building
[at 2425 Green Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8716093
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(2/6)

11) PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to two minutes for each speaker,

12) DISCUSSION OF FEE SCHEDULE IN LIGHT OF NEW INTERIM CONTROLS.

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT

DOUGLAS J. EN6MANK VICE PRESIDENT

MATTIE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER

JOSE E. MEDINA COMMISSIONER

DDR IS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE I, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case.
Rebuttal or closing remarks nay be made by either party only in exceptional
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Board.

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speaL first.

It shall be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed
fifteen minutes, or ten minutes per person, whichever is "less. If more time is
deemec necessary , such arguments must be made in writing, and received by the
board not later than two days before the appointed hearing..

Tne board shell consider tne departmental letter deemed as read, and such must de
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearinc.

Each member present at a meeting, shall vote for or against the matter before then
unless a Commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a majority
of the members present. (Amended February 6, 1986) (Emphasis added)

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must be
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later than
two days before the hearinc,. The Board will not consider written material submitted
less than two days before the hearinc.

Hailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearinc. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hearing
room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office at
554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING
Written requests for rehearing must oe filed within ten days from the date of a decision
and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be made by the board
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a
written request stating succinctly the grounds upon which such rehearing is requested,
(b) If ne* evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show:
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the
previous hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations for
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the
board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is
considered by the Board.

Robert H. Feldman
Executive Director
(415) 554-6720

City and County of San Francisco
BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS
Room 154-A, City Hall

r*^l *» ^ r . »» »- ^ -

n*i no

3C:":iGF PERMIT APPEHS

C .; : :: II - Rcom 154-A
San Fiancisco, CA 94102

<?<4/i

-tiTY" LIBRARIAN
Public Library

MEETING OF THE BOARD Or PERM]

APPEALS

WEDNESDAY; FEBRUARY 17, 1988
5:00 P.r... ROOT 282, CITY HALL

DOC U M E N iSDE PT.
FEB 17 1983

SAN 1-KAlMCi^OO

MATTERS FOF CONSIDERATION, REQUEST FOF REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDF.w!tn

ITEM A RESPONSE TO ALTERNATIVE WRIT OF MANDATE. Appeals Nos . 87-296 through B7-30C.
Recommendation of City Attorney to vacate ant set aside decisions in these five appeals ,
for tne purpose of considering additional written submissions and adopting findings,
in response to alternative writ of mandate issued by San Francisco Superior Court.
Tne board votec 5-0 to uphold the departments ano grant the permits on December 2, 1987.

FOR ADOPTION OF FINDINGS ONLY: Public hearing closed.

ITEM B Appeal No. 87-371 . Granting of a permit to alter a building at 175-29th Avenue.
Hearing held on February 10, 1988. Upon motion of President Berg, the Board voted
5-0 to uphold the department and grand the permit.

APPEAL NO. 87-361

ELIZABETH BURTON, Appellant
) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[December 4, 1987, to
[Michael Joyce, permit
[to Erect a Structure
[at 709 Foerster Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8713357.
[FOR HEARING HEARING TODAY

(1/23)

APPEAL HO. 88-009

THANH MA, Appellant
) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC HEALTH, - Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL
WITH CONDITIONS

[Imposition by Planning
[Dept. on January 6, 1988,
[of condition that no
[wholesale sales are
[permitted from bakery/
[restaurant operated by
[Thanh Ma at 2943 Mission St
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(2/22)

APPEAL NO. 88-008

SOUTH PARK CAFE, Appellant
) vs.

DEPT PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
ISCOTT DISAPPROVAL

"[Denial on December 29, 1987

[of request for placing tables

[and chairs in front of South

[Park Cafe at 109 South Park St.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(2/20)

APPEAL NO. 88-012

MARIO PALACIO, Appellant
I) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL

[Denial on January 6, 1988,
[of permit to Alter a Building
[at 1219 5th Ave.
[APPLICATION NO. 8700535.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(2/24)

APPEAL NO. 87-328

ALBERT E. BENJAMIN, JR. &
CAROL E. GAMBLE, Appellants
() vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[November 13, 1987, to
[Nelson C. Barry III, permit
[to Alter a Building at
[32 Sussex Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8704574.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(1/2)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, FEBRUARY 17, 1988

PAGE TWO

APPEAL NO. 87-344

CHARLES M. VADALABENE, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[November 30, 1987, to
[Harry Wright, permit to
[Demolish a Building at
[938 Santiago St.
[APPLICATION NO. 8715716
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(1/14)

APPEAL NO. 88-020

RAYMOND CLARK, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[January 11, 1988, to
[John Houck, permit to
[Alter a Building at
[376 Hill St.

[APPLICATION NO. 8717303,
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(3/1)

APPEAL NO. 88-013

EDWARD GAINES AND DAVID MENDIVIL,
■)) vs. Appellants

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent

[Order on January 8, 1988,
Lto Cease and Desist from
[conducting the two retail
[operations located at
[743-747 Haight St.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(2/28)

J) PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to two minutes for each speaker.

I) Consideration of department budget for FY1988-89.

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD CF PERMIT APPEALS

JERRY E. BERG ■ PRESIDENT

DOUGLAS J. ERGNANN VICE PRESIDENT

MATT IE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER |i

JOSE E. MEDIKA COMMISSIONER

doris levin! - official court reporter - 45c-9b9s

the residing officer kill call a recess whenever
necessary for the convenience of the hearing reporter

board 0" permit appeals rules, article i, section s

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of
the Department, Board, Commission or person fron whose order the appeal is taker
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall ther present his or her case.
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional
circumstances and is entirely within the discretion of the Boarc.

lh the case of Drotest appeals, the protestants shall speal. first.

It shell be the procedure that the time allowed for each side shall not exceed
fifteer. minutes, o*- ter. minutes per person, whichever is less. If more time is
oeemec necessary , suet arguments must be made ir. writing, anc received by the
boarc not later thar two oays before the appointee near inc.

Ine Boarc shell consioer the departmental letter deemed as reac, anc suet must be
received by the board no later than two days prior tc the appointed hearing.

Leer member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before tnen
unless a Commissioner is excused fron voting hy a motion adopted by a majority
of the members present. (Amended February i, 19B6) {Emphasis added)

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the board's Rules any writter. evidence or arguments in writing must be
received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later thar.
two days before the hearinc. The Board will not consider written material submitted
less than two days before the hearinc.

Kailec notice of public hearings or. appeals are sent to all parties at least five
oays prior to the date of hearinc. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced tc the parties in the hearing
roon., no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the board office at
55^-6721 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

REQUESTS FOP: REHEARING
written requests for rehearing must be filec withir, ten days fron the date of a decision
and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. Except in extraordinary cases, and
to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be made toy the Board
except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for the rehearing shall submit a
written request stating succinctly the grounds upon whicn sucn rehearing is requested.
(b) If ne* evidence be relied upon as a ground for rehearing, the application shall show:
1. The nature and character of the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a
description of the documents to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at
the original hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to "produce the evidence at the
previous hearinc shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presentations fo
requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the general practice of the
Board that no verbal testimony shall be recieved when such request for rehearing is
considered by the Board.

Roh^rt n tti^5. City and County of San Francisco

BOARD T' PiiM. ^ARIAN

Pub]lc Library

San Francisco, CA 94102

30
l

]tc*

ttLETING OF THE BOARD OF PBR"IT APPEAL3>QCUMfcMTa PiPT.

WEDNESDAY ^FEBRUARY 7K, I98£ F E B 2 6 1988

5:00 P.K., ROQK, 282, CITY HALL

SAN fKMlMClSGO

puri ir. < ibdaov

MATTERS FOP CONSIDERATION, REQUEST FOP REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE

ITEM A Letter frorr D- . George keralis reouesting rehearing of Appeal No. 87-363.

Tne appellant had appealed the issuance of a permit tc alter a buildino at 227 El Cairi

pel Mar. Or, February 1C, 1988, upon motion of Commissioner Fung, the board voted

5-C tc uphold the department and grant the permit.

FOP ADOPTION OP FINDINGS ONLY: Public hearing closed.

ITEM E Appeal Nc . 86-020. Granting of a permit to alter a building at 376 Hill Street,
hearing held or, February 17, 1988. Upon motion of Commissioner Jackson, the Board voted
4-0 to uphold the department and grant the permit.

APPEAL NOS. 87-296 to 87-300

SAN FRANCISCO BUILDING &
CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL,
) vs. Appellants

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[October 6, 1987, to
[EJM Construction, permit
[to Erect a Structure at
[330 Fillmore Street,
[at 338 Fillmore Street,
[at 346 Fillmore Street,
[at 352 Fillmore Street,
[& at 360 Fillmore Street.
[APPLICATION NOS. 8705070
[ to 8705074.

[REMANDED FROM SUPERIOR COURT.
[FOR REHEARING TODAY.

(11/25)

THANH MA, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC HEALTH, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL
WITH CONDITIONS

APPEAL NO. 88-009

[Imposition by Planning
[Dept. on January 6, 1988,
[of condition that no
[wholesale sales are
[permitted from bakery/
[restaurant operated by
[Thanh Ma at 2943 Mission St.
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY.

(2/22)

APPEAL NO. 87-370

MICHAEL HONG, Appellant
) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Imposition of penalty on
[December 18, 1987, for work
[done at 50-52 Diamond St.
[APPLICATION NO. 8713961.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(1/30)

VAN CAM VO, dba
"HONG KONG MASSAGE",

vs. Appellant
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent

APPEAL NO. 87-222

[Revocation on July 31, 1987,

[of Massage Establishment permit

[at 450-B Jones Street.

[FOR REHEARING TODAY. (9/19)

MARIA PASQj/lNI, Appellant,

vs.
POLICE' COMMISSION, Respondent

APPEAL NO. 87-369

[Protesting issuance on
[December 18, 1987, to
[Marguerite McGee, a
[Taxic/ab Permit
[RESOLUTION NO. 171^-8'
[FO/ HEARING TODAY

(1/30)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, FEBRUARY 2^ 1988 PAGE TWO

APPEAL NO. 87-373

PHILIP J. FAIGHT,
"SCANDALS-A-BAR",

vs.
POLICE DEPARTMENT,

dba
Appel lant

Respondent

"[Denial on December 21, 1987, of
[Billiard Parlor, Dance Hall Keeper,
[Mechanical Amusement Device, and
[Place of Entertainment permits
[at 162 Turk St.
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/31)

APPEAL NO. 88-004

PHILIP GORDON GIETZEN,

vs. Appellant
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Denial on January 6, 1988,
[of permit to Alter a Building
[at 2831 Laguna St.
[APPLICATION NO. 8717478.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(2/15)

APPEAL NO. 88-005

GERD WENSKE, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL

"[Denial on December 28, 1987,
[of permit to Alter a Building
[at 591-593 Buena Vista West.
[APPLICATION NO. 8612956.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(2/28)

APPEAL NO. 88-011

S. LUO PAJARVI, Appellant
)) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Denial on January 7, 1988,
[of permit to Alter a Building
[at 127-129 Belvedere St.
[APPLICATION NO. 8612685.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(2/6)

ERICA COWAN & JOAN FLORENCE,
:) vs. Appellants

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 87-350

[Protesting issuance on
[November 30, 1987, to
[Neil Cotter, permit to
[Demolish a Building at
[1254 18th Ave.
[APPLICATION NO. 8708695
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(1/17)

APPEAL NO. 87-366

CARIN L. ELMAN, Appellant
) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[December 8, 1987, to
[Daniel Fong, permit
[to Alter a Building
[at 2010 Vallejo St.
[APPLICATION NO. 8703911
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(1/27)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, FEBRUARY 24, 1988 PAGE THREE

APPEAL NO. 87-367

ALEXANDER SCHWED, Appellant
3A) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

"[Protesting issuance on
[December 15, 1987, to
[A. H. Coles, Jr., permit
[to Demolish a Building
[at 1441 Shotwell St.
[APPLICATION NO. 8703115
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(1/30)

APPEAL NO. 88-027

ALEXANDER SCHWED, Appellant
3B) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[January 22, 1988, to
[A. H. Coles, Jr., permit
[to Erect a Structure
[at 1441 Shotwell St.
[APPLICATION NO. 8703636
[FOR HEARING TODAY. ~

(3/8)

APPEAL NO. 88-014

SAN FRANCISCO BUILDING &
CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL,
4) vs. Appellants

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[January 8, 1988, to
[Barbara & Oscar Turner,
[permit to Alter a Building
[at 1915 Eddy St.
[APPLICATION NO. 8610430.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(2/28)

APPEAL NO. 88-015

MOO T. SOO HOO, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[January 12, 1988, to
[Don Benater, permit to
[Alter a Building at
[261 Cervantes Blvd.
[APPLICATION NO. 8717288.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(2/29)

3) PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentations shall be limited to two minutes for each speaker.

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN VICE PRESIDENT

MATTIE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER

JOSE E. MEDINA COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material
submitted less than two days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal . Except in extraordi-
nary cases, and to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be
made by the Board except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for
the rehearing shall submit a written request stating succinctly the grounds upon
which such rehearing is requested, (b) If new evidence be relied upon as a
ground for rehearing, the application shall show: l.The nature and character of
the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a description of the doc-
uments to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at the original
hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the pre-
vious hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presenta-
tions for requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the gener-
al practice of the Board that no verbal testimony shall be received when such
request for rehearing is considered by the Board.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(415) 554-6720 San Francisco, California 94102

'?r-;lT APPEALS
& 154-A

^n ' A 94102

£n£z^

Public Library

^A^A,

■Gu

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS
WEDNESDAY^ARCH 2, 1988
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL

DOCUMENTS DET 7.

MAR 2 1988

SAN FRANCISCO

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUEST FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE

REQUEST FOR THE BOARD TO TAKE JURISDICTION BEYOND THE 10-DAY APPEAL PERIOD.

ITEM A Letter from Claire C. Pilcher, Esq. on behalf of Virginia Stearns requesting

the Board to take jurisdiction over a building permit issued for construction at
3855-20th Street.

Permit issued

Appeal period ended

Request for jurisdiction received

January 15, 1988
January 25, 1988
February 25, 1988

(Ms. Stearns has already protested the issuance of a demolition permit for this
site which has been returned to City Planning for Proposition M findings.)

APPEAL NO. 88-015

MOO T. SOO HOO, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[January 12, 1988, to
[Don Benater, permit to
[Alter a Building at
[261 Cervantes Blvd.
[APPLICATION NO. 8717288.
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY.

(2/29)

APPEAL NO. 87-369

MARIA PASQUINI, Appellant

vs.
POLICE COMMISSION, Respondent

[Protesting issuance on
[December 18, 1987, to
[Marguerite Mc Gee, a
[Taxicab permit.
[RESOLUTION NO. 1719-87
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

APPEAL NO. 88-030

LOETA ETTA MILITELLO, Appellant

vs.
POLICE COMMISSION, Respondent

[Protesting issuance on
[February 4, 1988, to
[Richard Lygutis, a
[taxicab permit.
[RESOLUTION NO. 329-88.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(1/30)

(3/15)

APPEAL NO. 88-032

GINA ENR1QUEZ, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Imposition of penalty on
[February 5, 1988, for work
[done at 431 Vicente St.
[APPLICATION NO. 8609109.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(3/16)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, MARCH 2, 1988 PAGE TWO

APPEAL NO. 88-033

CINDY LEE, Appellant [Imposition of penalty on

vs. [February 9, 1988, for work

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [done without a permit at

[590-36th Ave.

[APPLICATION NO. 8714547.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/20)

APPEAL NO. 88-026

WAH MA, Appellant [Denial on January 27, 1988, of

vs. [permit to Alter a Building

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [at 858-44th Ave.

CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL [[APPLICATION NO. 8707129.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/8)

APPEAL NO. 88-028

JOHN C. LEE, Appellant ""^Denial on January 29, 1988,

vs. [of permit to Alter a Building

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [at 740 Washington St.

FIRE DEPARTMENT DISAPPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8713472.

CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL [FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/12)

APPEAL NO. 88-029

MELBA STRAZULO, Appellant [Denial on February 3, 1988, of

vs. [permit to Alter a Building

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [at 2554 Greenwich St.

CITY PLANNING, request cancellation [Planning requires recordation of

[special restrictions as condition

[of approval .

[APPLICATION NO. 8713153.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/14)

APPEAL NO. 88-023

HUGH A. DONOHOE, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

) vs. [January 14, 1988, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [William & Lois Yen, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Alter a Building at

[1358 -26th St.

[APPLICATION NO. 8710396.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/5)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, MARCH 2, 1988 PAGE THREE

APPEAL NO. V88-021

MARKBOROUGH CALIFORNIA PROPERTIES, "TProtesting issuance on

A) vs. Appellants [January 12, 1988, to

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [Federal Home Loan Bank,

[Open Space Variance sought

[for property located at

[600 California St.

[VARIANCE CASE NO. 86.85V

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/2)

APPEAL NO. V88-022

MARKBOROUGH CALIFORNIA PROPERTIES, Z TProtesting issuance on

B) vs. Appellants [January 12, 1988, to

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [Federal Hone Loan Bank,

[Bay Window Variance, for
[property located at
[600 California St.
[VARIANCE CASE NO. 86.85V.
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/2)

2) PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentations shall be limited to two minutes for each speaker.

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

JERRY E, BERG PRESIDENT

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN VICE PRESIDENT

MATT IE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER

JOSE E. MEDINA COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER,

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must

be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later

than two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material
submitted less than two days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal . Except in extraordi-
nary cases, and to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be
made by the Board except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for
the rehearing shall submit a written request stating succinctly the grounds upon
which such rehearing is requested, (b) If new evidence be relied upon as a
ground for rehearing, the application shall show: 1. The nature and character of
the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a description of the doc-
uments to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at the original
hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the pre-
vious hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presenta-
tions for requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the gener-
al practice of the Board that no verbal testimony shall be received when such
request for rehearing is considered by the Board.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(415) 554-6720 San Francisco, California 94102

2c "T/ippais

154-A
u. uA s>4102

'W, on j*

Pub! ■■: Library

k/tt

CLpc*~

d ,1,

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS
WEDNESDAY ^MARCH 9, 1988
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL

DOCUMENTS DEPT.

MAR 8 1988

SAN FRANCISCO
PUBLIC URRfXQv

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUEST FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING:
ITEM A Letter from James T.

Camp requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 88-020. The appellant

had protested the issuance of permit to alter a building at 376 Hill Street. Hearing held
February 17, 1988. Upon motion of Commissioner Jackson, the Board voted 4-0 to uphold
the department and grant the permit. President Berg was absent.

ITEM B Letter from David Cincotta, Esq., on behalf of Charles Vadalabene requesting

rehearing of Appeal No. 87-344. The appellant had protested the issuance of permit

to demolish a building at 938 Santiago Street. Upon motion of Commissioner Medina, the

Board voted 3-1 (Fung) to uphold the department and grant the permit. Four votes needed

to overrule, the department was upheld and the permit granted. Hearing held February 17, 1988.

ITEM C Letter from Edward Gaines requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 88-013. The
appellant had protested the order to cease and desist from conducting retail operations
at 743-747 Haight Street, Upon motion of Commissioner Jackson, the Board voted 4-0 to
uphold the Zoning Administrator's order subject to the condition that enforcement of the
order be stayed until July 1, 1988. President Berg was absent. Hearing February 17, 1988.

ITEM D Letter from Carol E. Gamble requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 87-328. The
appel lant had protested the issuance of permit to alter a building at 32 Sussex Street.
Hearing held February 17, 1988. Upon motion of Commissioner Fung, the Board voted
4-0 to uphold the department and grant the permit. President Berg was absent.

APPEAL NO. 86-176

ALD0 R. LUCCHESI, JR. &
ANN B. RAMSEY, Appellants

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

"[Denial on June 23, 1986, of
[permit to alter a building
[at 3133-37 Broderick Street.
[REMANDED FROM SUPERIOR COURT.
[APPLICATION NO. 8407250.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(8/11)

APPEAL NO. 88-023

HUGH A. D0N0H0E, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[January 14, 1988, to
[William & Lois Yen, permit
[to Alter a Building at
[1358 -26th St.
[APPLICATION NO. 8710396.
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY.

(3/5)

APPEAL NO. 88-040

GEORGE LANCIA, Appellant

vs.
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent

[Suspension on

[February 11, 1988, of

[Driver Public Vehicle

[permit and one-year

[probation.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(2/29)

APPEAL NO. 88-035

JUNE RICHARD, Appellant

vs.
ART COMMISSION, Respondent

[Suspension on
[February 3, 1988, of
[Street Artist permit,
[for 30 days commencing
[on February 15, 1988.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(3/27)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, MARCH 9, 1988 PAGE TWO

APPEAL NO. 88-007

DANIEL J. LYONS, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Imposition of penalty on
[January 11, 1988, for work
[done without a permit at
[303-353 Second Street.
[RECEIPT NO. 01141.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(2/16)

APPEAL NO. 88-010

WICHAI KEAWKALAYA, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Rejection on January 5, 1988,
[of permit application to Alter
[a Building at 296 Evelyn Way.
["FREEZE ORDER".
[RESOLUCTION NO, 1079-87.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(2/23)

APPEAL NO. 88-016

JOSE & DELIA HERRERA, Appellants

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Rejection on January 11, 1988,
[of permit application to Alter
[a Building at 251 Wheeler Ave.
["FREEZE ORDER".
[RESOLUTION NO. 1079-87.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(2/29)

APPEAL NO. 88-018

JOSE GARCIA, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Rejection on January 11, 1988,
[of permit application to Alter
[a Building at 93 Vienna St.
["FREEZE ORDER".
[RESOLUTION NO. 1079-87.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(3/1)

APPEAL NO. 88-019

FRANCISCO & GABRIELA ARMAS,
)) vs. Appellants

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Rejection on January 11, 1988,
[of permit application to Alter
[a Building at 118 Lee St.
["FREEZE ORDER".
[RESOLUTION NO. 1079-87.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(3/1)

RICHARD P. LIEBERMAN, Appellant
I) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
DAHI DISAPPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 87-191

"[Denial on July 15, 1987, of
[permit to Alter a Building
[at 620 Jones St.
[APPLICATION NO. 8601149.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(8/30)

VLADIMIR J. SHPOTNIK, Appellant
!) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 88-038

[Denial on February 17, 1988,
[of permit to Alter a Building
[at 1594 29th Ave.
[APPLICATION NO. 8717961.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(3/28)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, MARCH 9, 1988 PAGE THREE

APPEAL NO. 88-039

BRUCE BAUMANN, Appellant [Denial on February 16, 1988,

) vs. [of permit to Erect a Structure

DEPT. CITY PLANNING, Respondent [at 3615 Buchanan/1600 Bay Sts.

[APPLICATION NO. 8707405S.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/29)

APPEAL NO. 88-034

A. E. WOLFGANG MASTERS, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

) vs. [February 4, 1988, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Vivian Scott, permit to

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Alter a Building at

[251-253 Bartlett Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8710264.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/22)

APPEAL NO. 88-041

ERNEST C. YOUNG, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

) vs. [February 9, 1988, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Tony Chow, permit to

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Alter a Building at

[1256 7th Avenue.

[APPLICATION NO. 8717411.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/30)

) PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to two minutes for each speaker.

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

JERRY E, BERG PRESIDENT

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN VICE PRESIDENT

MATT IE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER

JOSE E. MEDINA COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: Representatives of
the Department, Board, Commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken
shall open the discussion. The appellant shall then present his or her case.
Rebuttal or closing remarks may be made by either party only in exceptional
circumstances jmd is entirely within the discretion of the Board.

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material
submitted less than two days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal . Except in extraordi-
nary cases, and to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be
made by the Board except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for
the rehearingshall submit a written request stating succinctly the grounds upon
which such rehearing is requested, (b) If new evidence be relied upon as a
ground for rehearing, the application shall show: 1. The nature and character of
the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a description of the doc-
uments to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at the original
hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the pre-
vious hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presenta-
tions for requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the gener-
al practice of the Board that no verbal testimony shall be received when such
request for rehearing is considered by the Board.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(415) 554-6720 San Francisco, California 94102

30AHD C? PERMIT APPEALS

all - Room 154-A
San Francisco, CA 94102 :

sf-tkiJ

Public Library

fc/gS

Cb&JL**

j*m^i^»*

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 16, 1988
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL

DOCUMENTS DEPT.

MAR l^988

SMIM KKMOiClSCO

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUEST FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

ITEM A Letter from S. Luo Pajarvi requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 88-011. The
appellant had appealed the denial of permit to alter a building at 127-129 Belvedere
Street. Hearing February 24, 1988. Upon motion President Berg, the Board voted
4-0 to uphold the department and deny the permit. [Commissioner Jackson was absent.)

ITEM B Letter from William Stout, Architect, on behalf of permit holder, A. H.
Coles requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 87-376. Hearing February 24, 1988. The
appellant, Alexander Schwed, had protested the issuance of permit to demolish a
building at 1441 Shotwell Street. Upon motion of Commissioner Fung, the Board voted
4-0 to overrule the department and deny the permit. (Commissioner Jackson was absent.)

ITEM C Letter from William Stout, Architect, on behalf of permit holder, A.H.
Coles requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 88-027. Hearing February 24, 1988. The
appellant, Alexander Schwed, had protested the issuance of permit to erect a structure
at 1441 Shotwell Street. Upon motion of Commissioner Fung, the Board voted 4-0
to overrule the department and deny the permit. (Commissioner Jackson was absent.)

ITEM D Letter from Carin L. Elman requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 87-366. The
appellant had protested the issuance of permit to alter a building at 2010 Vallejo
Street. Hearing February 24, 1988. Upon motion of Commissioner Medina, the Board
voted 4-0 to uphold the department and grant the permit. (Commissioner Jackson was
absent. )

APPEAL NO. 87-222

VAN CAM V0, dba
"HONG KONG MASSAGE",

vs. Appellant
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent

[Revocation on July 31, 1987,
[of Massage Establishment permit
[at 450-B Jones Street.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(9/19)

APPEAL NO. 87-373

PHILIP J. FAIGHT, dba
"SCANDALS-A-BAR", Appellant

vs.
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent

"[Denial on December 21, 1987, of

[Billiard Parlor, Dance Hall Keeper,

[Mechanical Amusement Device, and

[Place of Entertainment permits

[at 162 Turk St.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/31)

APPEAL NO. 88-042

ALFRED LEE, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Appealing for refund
[of penalty imposed on
[February 22, 1988, for
[work at 544 2nd. Ave.
[[APPLICATION NO. 8706021
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(4/3)

APPEAL NO. 88-047

NADER N. TAWASHA, Appellant

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Imposition of penalty on
[February 29, 1988, for work
[done at 533 Taylor St.
[APPLICATION NO. 8800472.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(4/9)

MEETING OF THE BUARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, MARCH 16, 1988 PAGE TWO

APPEAL NO. 87-356

HUGH JESSUP, Appellant
) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[December 3, 1987, to
[Mark Arbit, permit to
[Demolish a Building at
[769 Duncan Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8716728
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(1/21)

APPEAL NO. 88-037

RICHARD CONNOLLY, Appellant
) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[February 8, 1988, to
[Bill C. K. Lee, permit
[to Alter a Building
[at 590 36th Ave.
[APPLICATION NO. 8714547
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(3/28)

APPEAL NO. 88-043

GORDON C. WONG, Appellant
\) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[February 19, 1988, to
[Stephen Goldstine, permit
[to Alter a Building at
[1331 Green Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8711803.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(4/4)

APPEAL NO. 88-048

JERRY HILL, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[February 19, 1988, to
[Stephen Goldstine, permit
[to Alter a Building at
[1331 Green Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8711803.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(4/9)

JEFFREY BRISS, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 88-044

[Protesting issuance on
[February 16, 1988, to
[Linda E, Evans, permit
[to Alter a Building at
[143 Connecticut Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8712736.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(4/1)

MOUNT OLYMPUS NEIGHBORS ASSOC,
•) vs. Appellants

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 88-045

[Protesting issuance on
[February 22, 1988, to
[Eva Schwarcz, permit to
[Erect a Structure at
[333 Upper Terrace.
[APPLICATION NO. 8614914,
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(4/5)

•1EETIIIG OF THE BUARD UF PERMIT APPEALS, MARCH 16, 1988 PAGE THREE

APPEAL NO. 88-050

BARBARA M. SCHICK, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

) vs. [February 25, 1988, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Peter & Paul Bogatsky,

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [permit to Alter a Building

[at 2250 35th Avenue.

[APPLICATION NO. 8717771.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/11)

APPEAL NO. 88-031

ELLEN S. ARBENZ, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

) vs. [January 28, 1988, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Pat Joy & Jerry Friedman,

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [permit to Erect a Structure

[at 4150 17th Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8702683.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/16)

) PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to two minutes for each speaker,

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN VICE PRESIDENT

MATTIE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER

JOSE E. MEDINA COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material
submitted less than two days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal . Except in extraordi-
nary cases, and to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be
made by the Board except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for
the rehearing shall submit a written request stating succinctly the grounds upon
which such rehearing is requested, (b) If new evidence be relied upon as a
ground for rehearing, the application shall show: 1. The nature and character of
the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a description of the doc-
uments to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at the original
hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the pre-
vious hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presenta-
tions for requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the gener-
al practice of the Board that no verbal testimony shall be received when such
request for rehearing is considered by the Board.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(415) 554-6720 San Francisco, California 94102

T APPEAIS

154-A
San Fr. 34102

e^^2^

e-HV LIBRARIAN
Public Library

}20 * ^gf DOCUMENTS bfiPT.

WL & MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS lm 2 3 1988

WEDNESDAY, MARCH 25, 1988 5*£| ^^isoq
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL

rs\s

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUEST FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE

ITEM A Letter from Dennis Strazulo requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 88-029. The
appellant had protested the denial of permit to alter a building at 2554 Greenwich
Street. Hearing held March 2, 1988. Upon motion of Vice President Engmann, the
Board voted 5-0 to uphold the department subject to conditions.

APPEAL NO. 87-222

VAN CAM VO, dba [Revocation on July 31, 1987,

"HONG KONG MASSAGE", Appellant [of Massage Establishment permit

vs. [at 450-B Jones Street.

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent [FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/19)

APPEAL NO. 87-348

HOWARD & MAUREEN SCHAADT, [Protesting issuance on

& JEANNE GOLDMAN, Appellants [November 25, 1987, to

vs. [Diane Mei-Ling So, permit

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [to Alter a Building at

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [1836 Pacheco Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8710849.

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (1/16)

APPEAL NO. 87-369

MARIA PASQUINI, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

I vs. [December 18, 1987 to

POLICE COMMISSION, Respondent [Marguerite McGee, a

[Taxi cab permit.

[RESOLUTION NO. 1719-87.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/30)

APPEAL NO. 88-030

LOETA ETTA MILITELLO, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

) vs. [February 4, 1988, to

POLICE COMMISSION, Respondent [Richard Lygutis, a

[Taxicab permit.

[RESOLUTION NO. 329-88.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/15)

MEETING UP THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, MARCH 23, 1988 PAGE TWO

YOSSEDEK M. DESTA, Appellant

vs.
POLICE COMMISSION, Respondent

APPEAL

88-051
88-056
88-065
88-066
88-068

[Protesting issuance of
[Taxi cab permits on
[February 22, 1988, to
[the following persons.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

PERMIT HOLDER

RESOLUTION NO.

James Bolig

282-88

Wing Wong

311-88

Warren Wong, Sr.

304-88

Warren Wong, Jr.

305-88

Winston Wong

310-88

(4/11)

RICHARD E. THOMAS, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 88-006

[Denial on January 7, 1988,
[of permit to Alter a Building
[at 1460-1462 Page Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8705662.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(2/16)

APPEAL NO. 88-017

VICKIE STONE & RICHARD ZUCKERMAN,

vs. Appellants
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Rejection on January 11, 1988,

[of permit application to Alter

[a building at 893 Noe St.

["FREEZE ORDER".

[RESOLUTION NO. 1079-87.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/1)

APPEAL NO. 88-028

JOHN C. LEE, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
FIRE DEPT. DISAPPROVAL
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL

[Denial on January 29, 1988,
[of permit to Alter a Building
[at 740 Washington St.
[APPLICATION NO. 8713472.
[FOR HEARING TODAY..

(3/12)

APPEAL NO. 88-049

RONALD E. HOTHEM, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. CITY PLANNING, Respondent

"[Denial on February 19, 1988,
[of approval of an Alcoholic
[Beverage Control application
[for property located at
[430 Broadway St.
[LICENSE TYPE 41.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(4/9)

) PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to three minutes for each speaker.

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

JERRY E, BERG PRESIDENT

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN VICE PRESIDENT

MATT IE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER

JOSE E. MEDINA COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER,

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material
submitted less than two days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(415) 554-6720 San Francisco, California 94102

APPEALS

City Hall - Room 154-A
San Francisco, CA 94102

#-€d;

Public Library

'•>

/g*

<i Chf^AA.

meeting of the board of permit appeals

Wednesday; april 20, 1988

5:00 p.m., room 282, city hall

DOCUMENTS t

APR 2 0 1988

OAi>l h KaN CISCO
DMB«JO 'JBRARY

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUEST FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE

FOR ADOPTION OF FINDINGS ONLY: Public hearing closed.

ITEM A Appeal No. 88-005. Hearing held February 24, 1988. Appellant Gerd Wenske
appealed the denial of permit to alter a building at 591-593 Buena Vista West Avenue.
Upon motion of Vice President Engmann, the Board voted 4-0 to overrule the department
subject to conditions. Commissioner Jackson was absent.

ITEM B Letter from Robert W. Passmore, Zoning Administrator, requesting rehearing of
Appeal No. 88-005. Continued from April 13, 1988, at request of David Cincotta, Esq.

APPEAL NO. 88-006

RICHARD E. THOMAS, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL

[Denial on January 7, 1988,
[of permit to Alter a Building
[at 1460-1462 Page Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8705662.
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY.

(2/16)

ISHTIAQ A. BOKHARI, Appellant

vs.
POLICE DEPT., Respondent

APPEAL NO. 88-076

[Suspension for 10 days on

[February 29, 1988, of

[Driver Public Vehicle

[permit.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(4/23)

ellant

APPEAL NO. 88-077

[Revocation
[March 8
[Pub!
[F£ff HEARI

river
ermi t.

(4/23)

JAD JABER, Appellant

vs.
HEALTH DEPT., Respondent
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 88-081

[Disapproval on
[March 24, 1988, of
[Health Department permit
[for a food warehouse
[at 1010i-2 York Street.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(5/3)

SAN FRANCISCO BAND FOUNDATION,

) vs. Appellants

DEPT PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

APPEAL NO. 88-075

[Denial on March 1, 1988,
[of permit to Alter a Building
[at 1519 Mission St.
[APPLICATION NO. 8709445.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(4/20)

MEETING UF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, APRIL 20, 1988, PAGE TWO

APPEAL NO. 88-078

ARHAND B. CHALMERS, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

vs. [March 7, 1988, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Mr. & Mrs. John Mulligan,

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [permit to Alter a Building

[at 2562 Great Highway.

[APPLICATION NO. 8608664.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/30)

APPEAL NO. 88-079

BORIS KRALEVICH, Appellant ""[Protesting issuance on

vs. [March 11, 1988, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Asadoor 0. Astorian, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Alter a Building

[at 2425 California Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8717211.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/2)

APPEAL NO. 88-088

BOB GRIMES, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

) vs. [March 28, 1988, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [S. Suskauer & B. Dwyer,

[permit to Alter a Building

[at 170 Bonview Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8803904.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/15)

APPEAL NO. V88-074

FRANK WONG, Appellant [Denial on March 1, 1988,

0) vs. [of Rear Yard Variance sought

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [for property located at

[875 29th Avenue.

[VARIANCE CASE NO. 87.781V.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/20)

APPEAL NO. V88-080

MOO T. S00 H00, Appellant "TProtesting condition of

L) vs. [issuance on March 16, 1988,

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [to Tony M. Jorge da Silva,

[of Rear Yard, Usable Open
[Space & Off-Street Variances
[sought for property located
[at 251 Cervantes Blvd.
[VARIANCE CASE NO. 87.576V.
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/3)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, APRIL 20, 1988, PAGE THREE

APPEAL NO. Y88-083

J. A. ROKIN, Appellant "TDenial on March 15, 1988,

) vs. [of Front Setback Variance

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [sought for property located

[at 2516 Bryant Street.

[VARIANCE CASE NO. 87.600V.

[FOR HEARING TODAY... (5/9)

) PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to (3) minutes for each speaker.

) Amendment to Rules of the Board (Section 5 Article I) concerning time limits
for speakers pursuant to Section 16 . 5-1 of the San Francisco Administrative Code,

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

JERRY E, BERG PRESIDENT

DOUGLAS J. ENGMANN VICE PRESIDENT

MATT IE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER

JOSE E. MEDINA COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

In the case of protest appeals, the protestants shall speak first.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must be
received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than two days before the hearing. The Board will not consider written material
submitted less than two days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal . Except in extraordi-
nary cases, and to prevent manifest injustice, motions for rehearing shall not be
made by the Board except upon the following conditions: (a) The applicant for
the rehearing shall submit a written request stating succinctly the grounds upon
which such rehearing is requested, (b) If new evidence be relied upon as a
ground for rehearing, the application shall show: 1. The nature and character of
the new evidence; 2. The names of the witnesses and/or a description of the doc-
uments to be produced; and 3. Why the evidence was not produced at the original
hearing. Failure to exercise due diligence to produce the evidence at the pre-
vious hearing shall be deemed grounds for denial of the petition. All presenta-
tions for requests for rehearing shall be in writing, and it shall be the gener-
al practice of the Board that no verbal testimony shall be received when such
request for rehearing is considered by the Board.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Rail

(415) 554-6720 San Francisco, California 94102

Public Library

~SP

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS
WEDNESDAY/ MAY k, 1988
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL

DOCUMENTS DEPT.

MAY 4 1988

SAN FKAiMoioCO
PUBUC UfaKARY

MATTERS, FOR CONSIDERATION,. REQUEST FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING:

ITEM A Letter from Robert W. Passmore, Zoning Administrator, requesting rehearing of
Appeal No. 88-005. Continued from April 20, 1988, to May 4, 1988, at the request of
Barry Pearl of City Planning.

ITEM B Letter from Jad Jaber requestinq rehearing of Appeal No. 88-081 . Hearing April 20,
1988. Upon motion of Commissioner Medina, the Board voted 3-1 to overrule the Department
and grant the permit. Four votes needed to overrule, the dept. is upheld and the permit
denied. (President Berg dissented.)

ITEM C Letter from Inge Weidmann requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 88-063. Hearing
April 13, 1988. Upon motion of Vice President Engmann, the Board votea 4-0 to uphold
the department and sustain the penalty.

REQUEST FOR JURISDICTION BEYOND THE 15-DAY APPEAL PERIOD

ITEM D Letter from Dorian Sarris requestino the Board to take jurisdiction over permit
issued to him for work at 2167 Turk Street. Mr. Sarris was assessed and paid a penalty
at the time the permit was issued. He would like to appeal the penalty and request
a refund.

Permit issued

Appeal period ended

Request for jurisdiction received

March 3, 1988

March 18, 1988

April 19, 1988

ITEM E Letter from Michael Carlyle requesting the Board to take jurisdiction over permit
issued for work at 430 Bartlett Street.

Permit issued March 31, 1988

Appeal period ended April 15, 1988

Request for jurisdiction received April IE, 1988

FOR ADOPTION OF FINDINGS ONLY: Public hearing closed.

ITEM F Appeal No 88-006. Hearing April 20, 1988. Richard E. Thomas appealed the denial
of permit to al terT- buTlding at 1460-1462 Page Street. Upon motion of Vice President
Enqmanr. , the Board voted 4-0 to overrrule the department and grant the permit.
Commissioner Jackson was absent.

LARRY STINSON, Appellant

vs.
POLICE DEPARTMENT,. Respondent

APPEAL NO. 88-094

[Protesting issuance on

[March 25, 1988, to

[John McGeehan, dba

["Do U.C. Us Mobile Catering",

[a permit to do business

[at 1420 4th Street.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(5/21)

ROBERT J. BOSSI & ASSOCIATES,

vs. Appellants
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

APPEAL NO. 88-071

[Revocation on March 2, 1988 :
[of permits to Alter a
[Building at 435 Valencia St,
[APPLICATION NOS. 8715818
[ & 8800900.

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY.

(4/16)

MEETING OF THE BOARD UF PERMIT APPEALS, MAY H, 1988,

PAGE TWO

APPEAL NO. 88-089

FLOOD PLUMBING COMPANY,

vs. Appellants
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Appealing for refund
[of penalty imposed on
[March 25, 1988, for
[installing boilers without
[a permit at 433 Powell St.
[INVOICE NO. 01805.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(5/16)

APPEAL NO. 88-097

BONANZA MANAGEMENT COMPANY,

vs. Appellants
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Appealing for refund
[of penalty imposed on
[April 12, 1988, for work
[done without a permit
[at 3910 Geary Blvd.
[APPLICATION NO. 8803549
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(5/22)

APPEAL NO. 88-086

VICTOR WEINER, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL

"[Denial on March 28, 1988,
[of permit to Alter a Building
[at 43 Molimo Drive.
[APPLICATION NO. 8717441.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(5/10)

APPEAL NO. 88-095

LEONARD WOO, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

"[Denial on April 6, 1988,
[of permit to Alter a Building
[at 444 Greenwich Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8800934.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(5/21)

APPEAL NO. 88-101

NANCY & STUART SCHEINHOLTZ,

vs. Appellants
DEPT. CITY PLANNING, Respondent

T Denial on April 12, 1988,
[of permit to Alter a Building
[at 2417-2421 Larkin St. (88.123D)
[APPLICATION NO. 8802304.

[FOR HEARING TODAY

(5/23)

FRIENDS OF NOE VALLEY

vs. Appellants
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 88-090

[Protesting issuance on
[March 25, 1988, to
[Abraham & Gretta Kass,
[permit to Alter a Building
[at 4049 24th St. (88.037D)
[APPLICATION NO. 8715679.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(5/16)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, MAY 4, 1988, PAGE THREE

APPEAL NO. 88-092

EARL ROCKER, Appellant "["Protesting issuance on

) vs. [March 28, 1988, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Pyotr Kligman, permit to

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Erect a Structure at

[120 Whitney St. (87.517D)
[APPLICATION NO. 8708996.
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/17)

APPEAL NO. 88-096

ERMALINDA & WILLIAM HELGESON, [Protesting issuance on

J vs. [March 28, 1988, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Odelin Perez, permit to

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Alter a Building at

[1179 Treat Avenue.

[APPLICATION NO. 8717157.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/22)

APPEAL NO. V88-087

CLIFFORD C. SWEET, Appellant LDenial on March 22, 1988,

vs. [of Minimum Lot Area, Rear

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, [Yard, Usable Open Space &

Respondent [Off-Street Parking Variances

[sought for property located
[at 221 Lathrop Avenue.
[VARIANCE NO. 87.514V.
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/14)

) PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to (3) minutes for each speaker.

) FOR APPROVAL: Policy and Rule of the Board of Permit Appeals regulating the

recycl ing of paper.

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT

JOSE E. MEDINA VICE PRESIDENT

MATTIE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: In the case of ap-
peal of denials, revocations and suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken shall
speak first and shall be allowed seven (7) minutes for their presentation and
three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

In the case of protest appeals, the protestor shall speak first and shall be
allowed seven (7) minutes to present oral argument and three (3) minutes for
rebuttal, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes to present
oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal. The Board may request a
departmental response at its own discretion.

In cases of multiple appeals of the same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7) min-
utes to present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal and shall
speak consecutively, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for oral arguments and, for each appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

Any written submittals must be received by the Board not later than five days
before the appointed hearing, with copies of said written submittals received
by the departmental representatives and other principals by the same day.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before
tnem unless a commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a
majority of the members present. (Amended April 20, 1988)

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARIN6

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(415) 554-6720 San Francisco, California 94102

City _Hall :r_;i54-A
aan Francisco, CA 94102

<?~t:<LJ

Public Librdry

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS MAY y ,S88
WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 1988 J** !y*JK*oo
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUEST FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE
REQUESTS FOR REHEARING:

ITEM A Letter from Robert D. Winkler, Esq., on behalf of appellant, Mr. Boris
Kralevich, requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 88-079. Hearing April 20, 1988. Appellant
had protested the issuance of permit to alter a building at 2425 California Street.
Upon motion of Vice President Engmann, the Board voted 4-0 to uphold the department
and grant the permit. Commissioner Jackson was absent.

ITEM B Letter from Carol E. Gamble, requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 87-328. The
appel 1 ant had protested the issuance of permit to alter a building at 32 Sussex Street.
Hearing held February 17, 1988. Upon motion of Commissioner Fung, the Board voted
4-0 to uphold the department and grant the permit. President Berg was absent. This
request continued from March 9, 1988 addendum to allow time for the Bureau of Building
Inspection to review revised plans with neighbors. This matter continued from April 13,
1988 addendum for further consideration.

APPEAL NO. 88-092

EARL ROCKER, Appellant ~TProtesting issuance on

vs. [March 28, 1988, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Pyotr Kligman, permit to

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Erect a Structure at

[120 Whitney St. (87.517D)
[APPLICATION NO. 8708996.
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/17)

APPEAL WO. 87-344

CHARLES M. VADALABENE, [Protesting issuance on

vs. Appellant [November 30, 1987, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Harry Wright, permit to

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Demolish a Building at

[938 Santiago St.

[APPLICATION NO. 8715716.

[FOR FURTHER REHEARING TODAY. (1/14)

APPEAL NO. 88-049

RONALD E. HOTHEK, Appellant ^Denial on February 19, 1988,

vs. [of approval of an Alcoholic

DEPT. CITY PLANNING, Respondent [Beverage Control application

[for property located at

[430 Broadway St.

[LICENSE TYPE 41.

[FOR REHEARING TODAY. (4/9)

APPEAL NO. 88-110

RONALD E. HOTHEM, Appellant [Denial on April 18, 1988,

t vs. [permit to Alter a Building

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Responoent [at 430 Broadway Street.

:iTY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8800156.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/28)

MEETING OF THE BUARD UF PERMIT APPEALS, MAY 11, 1988

PAGE TWO

APPEAL NO. 88-085

ADAM SPARKS, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Imposition of Conditions
[on March 16, 1988, attached
[to a permit of occupancy
[at 420 Jones Street.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(5/10)

APPEAL NO. 88-112

CHRISTOPHER WESTERGUARD,

vs. Appellant
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Appealing for refund
[of penalty imposed on
[April 7, 1988, for work
[done without a permit at
[377 Douglass Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8802703.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(5/29)

JOHN & ROSEMARY HIRSHBERG, &
BENJAMIN SLICK, Appellants

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 88-098

"[Protesting issuance on
[April 6, 1988, to
[Douglas & Jill Hope, permit
[to Alter a Building at
[2848 Scott Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8802630.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(5/22)

SAN FRANCISCO BUILDING I
CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL,

vs. Appellants
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Responoent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 88-105

[Protesting issuance on
[April 7, 1988, to the
[Public Utilities Commission-
[UEB, permit to Erect e
[Structure at 1941 Harrison St,
[APPLICATION NO. 8801205.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(5/28)

SAN FRANCISCO BUILDING &
CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL,

vs. Appellants
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 88-106

[Protesting issuance on
[April 7, 1988, to the
[Public Utilities Commission,
[permit to Alter a Building
[at 1940 Harrison St.
[APPLICATION NO. 8801206.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(5/28)

PUBLIC COfi'.ENT: Presentation shall be limited to (3) minutes for eacn speaker.

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT

JOSE E. MEDINA VICE PRESIDENT

MATTIE J, JACKSON COMMISSIONER

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before
them unless a commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a
majority of the members present. (Amended April 20, 1988)

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision anG may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(415) 554-6720 San Francisco, California 94102

;t appeals

.1 154-A
San Francisco, CA 94102

'cHZ<l;

Put! ic Library

^— 1

DOCUMENTS DEPT.

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS
WEDNESDAY, MAY 25, 1988
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL ^Jo^j^Trv

1988

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE

FOR ADOPTION OF FINDINGS ONLY: Public hearing closed.

ITEM A Appeal No. 87-344 protesting issuance of a permit to demolish a building at
938 Santiago Street. Hearing May 11, 1988. Upon motion of Commissioner Fung, the Board
voted 4-0 to revoke the permit.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING:

ITEM B Letter from Robert W. Passmore, Zoning Administrator, requesting rehearing of
Appeal No. 88-006. Hearing April 20, 1988. The appellant, Richard E. Thomas, had protested
the denial of permit to alter a building at 1460-1462 Page Street. Upon motion of Vice-
President Engmann, the Board voted 4-0 to overrule the department and grant the permit.
Commissioner Jackson was absent.

ITEM C Letter from Victor Weiner requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 88-086. Hearing
May 4, 1988. The appellant had protested the denial of a permit to alter a building at
43 Molimo Drive. Upon motion of Commissioner Jackson, the Board voted 1-3 to overrule
the department and grant the permit. Four votes needed to overrule, the department is
upheld and the permit denied. Commissioners Berg, Fung and Medina dissented.

ITEM D Letter from Wayne Rieke on behalf of appellant, Clifford C. Sweet, requesting
rehearing of Appeal No. V88-087. Hearing May 4, 1988. The appellant had protested the
denial of a variance for property located at 221 Lathrop Avenue. Upon motion of
President Berg, the Board voted 2-2 to uphold the department and deny the variance.
Four votes need to overrule, the department is upheld and the variance denied.
Commissioners Jackson and Medina dissented.

ITEM E Letter from David Cincotta, Esq., on behalf of the appellant, Robert J. Bossi
and Associates, requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 88-071 . The appellants had appealed
the revocation of permits to alter a building at 435 Valencia Street. Hearing May 4,
1988. Upon motion of Commissioner Fung, the Board voted 4-0 to overrule the department
and grant the permit subject to conditions.

ITEM F Letter from J. A. Bokin requesting rehearing of Appeal No. V88-083. The
appellant had protested the denial of a variance for property located at 2516 Bryant
Street. Hearing April 20, 1988. Upon motion of Commissioner Medina, the Board voted
4-0 to uphold the Zoning Administrator and deny the variance.

HOWARD & MAUREEN SCHAADT,

& JEANNE GOLDMAN, Appellants

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 87-348

[Protesting issuance on
[November 25, 1987, to
[Diane Mei-Ling So, permit
[to Alter a Building at
[1836 Pacheco Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8710849.
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY.

(1/16)

RICHARD P. LIEBERMAN, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
DAHI DISAPPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 87-191

"[Denial on July 15, 1987, of
[permit to Alter a Building
[at 620 Jones Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8601149.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(8/30)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, MAY 25, 1988 PAGE TWO

APPEAL NO. 88-010

WICHAI KEAWKALAYA, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Rejection on January 5, 1988,
[of permit application to Alter
[a Building at 296 Evelyn Way.
["FREEZE ORDER".
[RESOLUTION NO. 1079-87.
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY.

(2/23)

JOSE & DELIA
DEPT. PUBLIC

APPEAL NO. 88-016

HERRERA, Appellants

vs.

WORKS, Respondent

[Rejection on January 11, 1988,
[of permit application to Alter
[a Building at 251 Wheeler Ave.
["FREEZE ORDER".
[RESOLUTION NO. 1079-87.
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY.

(2/29)

VICKIE STONE

DEPT. PUBLIC

APPEAL NO. 88-017

& RICHARD ZUCKERMAN,
vs. Appellants
WORKS, Respondent

[Rejection on January 11,
[of permit application to
[a building at 893 Noe St
["FREEZE ORDER".
[RESOLUTION NO. 1079-87.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

1986,
Alter

(3/1)

APPEAL NO. 88-109

HOUSE & HOUSE ARCHITECTS,

vs. Appellants
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Rejection on April 15, 1988,
[of permit application to
[Alter a Building at
[60 San Felipe Avenue.
[REQUEST NO. 9000122.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(5/28)

PACIFIC AVENUE NEIGHBORS,

vs. Appellants
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 88-046

[Protesting issuance on
[February 16, 1988, to
[Gene Aubry, permit to
[Alter a Building at
[2961 Pacific Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8717918
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(4/6)

SUZANNE D. CAUTHEN, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 88-084

[Protesting issuance on
[March 16, 1988, to
[James Kelso, permit to
[Alter a Building at
[100 Alta Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8802056
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(5/9)

MEETING OF THE BOARD UF PERMIT APPEALS, MAY 25, 1988 PAGE THREE

APPEAL NO. 88-107

MONA OSTERHOUDT, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

) vs. [April 5, 1988, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Tony Fazio & Tony Campilongo,

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [permit to Alter a Building

[at 112 Fair Oaks Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8802961.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/28)

APPEAL NO. 88-108

MONA OSTERHOUDT, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

) vs. [April 7, 1988, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Tony Fazio, permit to

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Alter a Building at

[112 Fair Oaks Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8700405.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/28)

APPEAL NO. 88-111

PHIL1PP & VIRGINIA FRINGS, [Protesting issuance on

vs. Appellants [September 10, 1987, to

DEPT PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [John G. Day, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Alter a Building

[at 1910 Baker Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8710712.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/29)

PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to (3) minutes for each speaker.

Policy regarding slurs. Resolution for adoption. Recommended by Civil Service
Commi ssion.

Fee increase amendment. Proposal to increase appeal fees by amending Section 8
of Part III of the S.F. Municipal Code.

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT

JOSE E. MEDINA VICE PRESIDENT

MATT IE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

Each member present at e meeting shall vote for or against the matter before
them unless a commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a
majority of the members present. (Amended April 20, 1988)

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(415) 554-6720 San Francisco, California 94102

J .

CFPEf^T APPEALS

m 154-A
ancisco, CA S4102

'tT-C^

y&j-TV LIBRARIAN
Pub! ic Library

■'cu

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS
WEDNESDAY7" JUNE 8, 1988
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL

DOCUMENTS CM

J UN 81S8S

SAN |-KMIMWK»vO

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUEST FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE

REQUEST FOR JURISDICTION BEYOND THE 15-DAY APPEAL PERIOD.

ITEM A Letter from Harry O'Brien* Esq., on behalf of Hong Kong Metro Realty Inc
requesting the Board to take jurisdiction over the revocation of permits issued
for work at 2987-38th Avenue, 3712 Ulloa Street, 3702 Ulloa Street, 3734 Ulloa
Street and 3722 Ulloa Street.

Permits revoked

Appeal period ended

Request for jurisdiction received

May A, 1988
May 19, 1988
May 23, 1988

ITEM B Letter from Earl Rocker requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 88-092. Hearing
May 4, 1988. Upon motion of President Berg, the Board voted 4-0 to uphold the
department and grant the permit subject to conditions.

MONA OSTERHOUDT, Appellant
i) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 88-107

[Protesting issuance on
[April 5, 1988, to
[Tony Fazio & Tony Campilongo,
[permit to Alter a Building
[at 112 Fair Oaks Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8802961.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(5/28)

MONA OSTERHOUDT, Appellant
I) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 88-108

[Protesting issuance on
[April 7, 1988, to
[Tony Fazio, permit to
[Alter a Building at
[112 Fair Oaks Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8700405
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(5/28)

CINDY J. WASELESKI, Appellant
\) vs.

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent

APPEAL NO. 88-077

[Revocation on
[March 8, 1988, of Driver
[Public Vehicle permit.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(4/23)

CINDY J. WASELESKI, Appellant
») vs.

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent

APPEAL NO. 38-115

[Revocation on
[April 6, 1988, of Driver
[Public Vehicle permit.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(5/30)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, JUNE 8, 1988 PAGE TWO

APPEAL NO. 88-129

DEBRA SHARABI, Appellant

vs.
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent

"[Denial on May 6, 1988,
[of Pushcart Peddler permit
tat the southeast corner
[of Geary & Mason Streets.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(6/20)

APPEAL NO. 88-134

PEGGY BLEY, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Imposition of penalty
[imposed on May 26, 1988,
[for work done at
[309 San Marcos Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8806151.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(7/5)

APPEAL NO. 88-125

WAYNE WOO, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL

"[Denial on May 6, 1988, of
[permit to Alter a Building
[at 645 Bosworth St.
[APPLICATION NO. 8802816.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(6/15)

APPEAL NO. 88-126

ALBERT R. UJCIC, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[April 22, 1988, to
[John Woolley Jr., permit
[to Erect a Structure at
[236 Randall St. (87.461D)
[APPLICATION NO. 8709134.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(6/18)

APPEAL NO. 88-127

ERIC SCHWARTZ, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[May 2, 1988, to
[Lisle Payne, permit to
[Alter a Building at
[3616 Jackson Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8805429.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(6/20)

CHARLES J. LEWIN, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 88-130

"[Protesting issuance on
[May 5, 1988, to
[Steve Tsui, permit to
[Alter a Building at
[730 7th Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8802843.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(6/27)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, JUNE 8, 1988 PAGE THREE

APPEAL NO. 88-131

JUNE L. GOLD, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[May 9, 1988, to
[Melencio Alvarez, permit
[to Alter a Building at
[275 Santa Rosa Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8715884
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(6/28)

PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to (3) minutes for each speaker.

FEE INCREASE AMENDMENT:

Proposal to increase appeal fees by amending Sec. 8

of Part III of the S. F. Municipal Code.

For adoption as amended at public hearing May 25, 1988.

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

JERRY E. BERG PRESIDENT

JOSE E. MEDINA VICE PRESIDENT

MATTIE J. JACKSON COMMISSIONER

FRANK S. FUNG COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against the matter before
them unless a commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a
majority of the memDers present. (Amended April 20, 1988)

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(415) 554-6720 San Francisco, California 94102

:,CARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Cit i 154-A

San \ 94102

v. i

-v-tirf^rR4-A^..

Public Library

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 15, 1988
QjttLct*-, 5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL

DOCUMENTS DEPT.
JUN 14 1988

SAN t-KAid^lSCO
PUBLIC LIKKARV

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUEST FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE

ITEM A Election of Board officers.

REQUEST FOR JURISDICTION BEYOND THE 15-DAY APPEAL PERIOD '

ITEM B Letter from Frank Zenner requesting the Board to take jurisdiction over permit
issued for work at 388-5th Street.

Permit issued

Appeal period ended

Request for jurisdiction received

May 18, 1988
June 2, 1988
June 3, 1988

JAD JABER, Appellant

vs.
HEALTH DEPARTMENT, Respondent
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 88-081

[Denial on March 24, 1988,.
[of Health Department permit
[for a food warehouse
[at 1010^ York Street.
[FOR REHEARING TODAY.

(5/3)

MARION COCHRANE, Appellant

vs.
POLICE COMMISSION, Respondent

APPEAL NO. 88-117

[Reversion on
[April 12, 1988, of
[a Taxi Medallion permit
[to the City of S.F.
[MEDALLION NO. 345.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(6/6)

JAMES REAM, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
DAHI DISAPPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 88-121

[Denial on May 4, 1988,
[of permit to Alter a
[Building at 2640 Green St.
[APPLICATION NO. 8805323.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(6/13)

PETER & HOLLY GOTTSCHALK,

vs. Appellants
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

APPEAL NO. 88-133

[Denial on May 12, 1988, of
[permit to Alter a Building
[at 641 Excelsior Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8615546.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(7/3)

PACIFIC AVENUE NEIGHBORS,

vs. Appellants
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 88-046

[Protesting issuance on
[February 16, 1988, to
[Gene Aubry, permit to
[Alter a Building at
[2961 Pacific Avenue
[APPLICATION NO. 8717918.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(4/6)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, JUNE 15, 1988,

PAGE TWO

APPEAL NO. 88-123

CHARLES F. HAINES, Appellant
i vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

"[Protesting issuance on
[April 20, 1988, to
[Michael Joyce, permit
[to Erect a Structure
[at 705 Foerster Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8713359
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(6/14)

APPEAL NO. 88-124

CHARLES F. HAINES, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[April 20, 1988, to
[Michael Joyce, permit
[to Erect a Structure
[at 709 Foerster Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8713357
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(5/14)

APPEAL NO. 88-103

WALLACE LIM, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL

"[Revocation on March 31, 1988,
[of permit to Erect a Structure
[at 50 Torrens Court.
[APPLICATION NO. 8609945.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(5/24)

NEIGHBORS & PROPERTY OWNERS
ASSOCIATION, Appellants

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 88-082

[Protesting issuance on
[March 11 , 1988, to
[Wallace Lim, permit to
[Erect a Structure at
[50 Torrens Court.
[APPLICATION NO. 8609945
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(5/4)

APPEAL NO. 88-114

HARLEY C. HARDESTY, Appellant
vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[April 6, 1988, to
[Charles Mosser, permit
[to Alter a building at
[2350 Union Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8801882
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(5/30)

MR. & MRS. A. ALARCON, Appellants

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 88-116

[Protesting issuance on
[April 15, 1988, to
[Chris Lane, permit to
[Alter a Building at
[1400 Washington St.
[APPLICATION NO. 8803292
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(6/4)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, JUNE 15, 1988, PAGE THREE

APPEAL NO. 88-119

JOHN D. MICHAEL, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

) vs. [April 18, 1988, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Mike Sarfaty, permit to

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Alter a Building at

[741-743 Castro St. and

[588 Liberty St.

[APPLICATION NO. 8803435.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/11)

APPEAL NO. V88-122

SAMUEL NOILY, Appellant [Protesting conditions 2 & 4 of

vs. [issuance on April 20, 1988,

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [of Rear Yard variance sought

[for property located at

[1229 Diamond Street.

[VARIANCE CASE NO. 87.236V.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/13)

PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to (3) minutes for each speaker,

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

RALPH D. HOUSE COMMISSIONER

VICTOR 6. MAKRAS COMMISSIONER

ESTHER Y. MARKS COMMISSIONER

PAUL H. MELBOSTAD COMMISSIONER

BEVERLY J. PRIOR COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES. ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

In cases of multiple appeals of the same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7) min-
utes to present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal and shall
speak consecutively, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for roal arguments and, for each appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the Departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

City and County of San Francisco

Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(£tt:\ CC/CTOn Can Franncrfl C a 1 i f nrni a Q^lrtO

CITY LIBRARIAN
Put! i <- Library

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS JUN 2 2 138Q
WEDNESDAY/JUNE 22, 1988 ^ ^---o

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL

A. Informational presentation and discussion of the following matters:

NOTE: No public testimony will be received at this time. This is for informational
purposes only and will not involve action on any matters.

1. Board of Permit Appeals Organization.

2. Charter, Ordinances, Prop M, Board Rules, Economic Interest Statements and
travel out of state letters to the Mayor.

3. City Attorney.

4. Types of Appeals:

a. Public Works - Demolition, alteration and new construction permits.

b. City Planning - Discretionary Review decisions of Planning Commission on
building permits. Variance decisions and determinations of Zoning
Administrator. Project authorization decisions (beauty contest).

c. Police - Taxicab, taxi driver, massage parlor, massage employee, mobile
caterer, mechanical amusement device, billiard parlor, place of entertain-
ment, cabaret permits, and pushcart permits.

d. Art Commission - Street artist permits.

e. Public Health - Restaurant and food storage permits.

f. Fire - Parking lots, vehicle storage garage permits.

g. Redevelopment Agency - Building permits.

B. Public Comment.

NOTE: Public comment will be limited in length to 3 minutes per speaker. The Board
will not act on any matters raised.

ADJOURNMENT

iOlfB VO 'MSWURIJ UP:
V'PSl Uioojj - ijgLj fcn

iPPEAIi

154-A
S4102

2 - DOCUMENTS DEPT.

*/'8 MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS JUL.X4 19S8

WEDNESDAY, JULY 15, 1988 san fkaimcisco

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL P"RUO UBRA*Y

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUEST FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE

FOR ADOPTION OF FINDINGS ONLY: Public hearing closed.

ITEM A Appeal No. 88-150. Hearing June 29, 1988. Upon motion of Vice President Makras,
the Board voted 4-0 to overrule the Zoning Administrator's Order.

ITEM B Appeal No. 88-116. Hearing June 29, 1988. Upon motion of Commissioner Melbostad,
the Board voted 5-0 to uphold the department and grant the permit subject to conditions.

REQUEST FOR REHEARING:

ITEM C: Letter from Charles F. Haines requesting a rehearing of Appeals Nos . 88-123 and
88-124. Hearing June 15, 1988. Upon motion of Vice President Makras, the Board voted
4^1 ("President Marks dissented) to uphold the department and grant the permits subject
to conditions. The appellant protested the issuance of permits to erect structures at
705 Foerster Street and 709 Foerster Street.

ITEM D: Letter from Howard N. Ellman, Esq., requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 88-046 .
Hearing June 29, 1988. The appellants, Pacific Avenue Neighbors, had appealed tfie~~
issuance of permit to alter a building at 2961 Pacific Avenue. Upon motion of Commissioner
Prior, the Board voted 5-0 to uphold the department and grant the permit.

APPEAL NO. 88-146

WARN0CK A. HOLMES, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

vs. [May 19, 1988, to John Lau,

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [permit to Alter a Building

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [at 258-18th Avenue.

[APPLICATION NO. 8707464.

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (7/13)

APPEAL NO. 88-081

JAD JABER, Appellant [Denial on March 24, 1988,.

vs. [of Health Department permit

HEALTH DEPARTMENT, Respondent [for a food warehouse

CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL [at 1010^ York Street.

[FOR REHEARING TODAY. (5/3)

APPEAL NO. 88-162

ZUNI CAFE, Appellant [Order on June 15, 1988,

vs. [to cease from the operation

DEPT. PUBLIC HEALTH, Respondent [of an oven at 1658 Market St.

[RESOLUTION NO. 88-27.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/26)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, JULY 13, 1988 PAGE TWO

APPEAL NO. 88-161

MICHAEL MALBASA, Appellant [Imposition of penalty

vs. [on June 15, 1988, for

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [work done at 1008 Alabama

[Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8805939.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/26)

APPEAL NO. 88-168

MARKBOROUGH CALIFORNIA PROPERTIES, [Protesting issuance on

vs. Appellants [June 10, 1988, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Federal Home Loan Bank,

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [permit to Demolish a Building

[at 600 California Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8803564.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/3)

APPEAL NO. 88-169

MARKBOROUGH CALIFORNIA PROPERTIES, [Protesting issuance on

vs. Appellants [June 10, 1988, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Federal Home Loan Bank,

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [permit to Demolish a Building

[at 551 Kearny Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8803563.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/3)

APPEAL NO. 88-101

NANCY & STUART SCHEINHOLTZ, [Denial on April 12, 1988,

vs. Appellants [of permit to Alter a Building

DEPT. CITY PLANNING, Respondent [at 2417-2421 Larkin Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8802314.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/23)

APPEAL NO. 88-151

RUPERT YAM, Appellant [Rejection on June 1, 1988,

vs. [of permit application to

DEPT PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Alter a Building at

CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL [80 Panorama Dr.

[APPLICATION NO. 9000209.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/18)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, JULY 13, 1988

PAGE THREE

APPEAL NO. 88-144

FOUNDATION FOR SAN FRANCISCO
ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE,

vs. Appellants
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[May 19, 1988, to Four
[Seas Invstmnt Corp., permit
[to Demolish a Building
[at 612 Washington Street.
[(Colombo Building)
[APPLICATION NO. 8714212.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(7/7)

APPEAL NO. 88-152

MARC LORAN, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[May 26, 1988, to
[Mark Tarn, permit to
[Demolish a Building
[at 1641 12th Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8604078,
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(7/19)

APPEAL NO. 88-148

MARC LORAN, Appellant

i vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[May 27, 1988, to
[Mark Tarn, permit to
[Erect a Structure
[at 1641 12th Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8613318.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(7/16)

APPEAL NO. 88-153

GARY RAUGH, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[May 26, 1988, to
[Maria & George Hartman TR,
[permit to Alter a Building
[at 2600 Pacific Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8604078.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(7/19)

GEORGIA BRITTAN, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 88-155

[Protesting issuance on
[May 27, 1988, to
[Steve Beckerman, permit
[to Demolish a Building
[at 4023 Army Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8706496
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(7/23)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, JULY 13, 1988

PAGE FOUR

APPEAL NO. 88-163

13)

2029 FILLMORE STREET TENANTS,

vs. Appellants
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[June 9, 1988, to
[Astoriam Investments, permit
[to Alter a Building at
[2029 Fillmore Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8807669.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(7/27

APPEAL NO. 88-166

14)

FOSTER REED, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[June 7, 1988, to H. Shapiro,
[C. McCullough & H. Schneider,
[permit to Erect a Structure
[at 932 Church Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8801191.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(7/31

APPEAL NO. 88-173

SAN FRANCISCO BUILDING &
CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL,
15) vs. Appellants

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Protesting issuance on
[April 8, 1988, to
[Anthony Wong, permit
[to Erect a Structure
[at 3640 18th Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8707470
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(5/28

16) PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker,

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

ESTHER Y. MARKS PRESIDENT

VICTOR G. MAKRAS VICE PRESIDENT

RALPH D. HOUSE COMMISSIONER

PAUL H. MELBOSTAD COMMISSIONER

BEVERLY J. PRIOR COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: In the case of ap-
peal of denials, revocations and suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken shall
speak first and shall be allowed seven (7) minutes for thier presentation and
three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

In cases of multiple appeals of the same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7) min-
utes to present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal and shall
speak consecutively, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for roal arguments and, for each appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

UlF^ RRd-fi7?n San Francisco. California 94102

154-A
;isco, CA S4102

'- v/"

CITY LIBRARIAN
Public Library

50 ^ (J&iidtL ^-^C

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS documents dept.
WEDNESDAY, JULY 20, 1988 JUL i 8 19S8

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL Zj$jn$%gg&

o/gg

VTTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUEST FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE

[QUEST FOR JURISDICTION BEYOND THE 15-DAY APPEAL PERIOD:

rEM A Letter from Michael D. Franklin requesting the Board to take jurisdiction over
srmit issued for a Kosher hot dog stand in the 1200 block of Battery Street adjacent
d Levi ' s Plaza.

Permit issued June 14, 1988

Appeal period ended June 29, 1988

Request for jurisdiction received July 8, 1988

EQUESTS FOR REHEARING:

TEM B Letter from Stanley M. Smith requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 88-138.
ppellant had protested the issuance of permit to Erect a Structure at 2261 Bush
treet. Hearing June 29, 1988. Upon motion Commissioner Prior, the Board voted
-1 (Commissioner House dissented) to uphold the department and grant the permit.

TEM C Letter from Brian Connors, Esq. on behalf of Christopher Lane and the 1400
ashington Street Association, requesting rehearingvof Appeal No. 88-116. Hearing
une 29, 1988. Appellants had protested the issuance to Mr. Connor's clients a
ermit to alter a building at 1400 Washington Street. Upon motion of Commissioner
elbostad, the Board voted 5-0 to uphold the department and grant the permit
ubject to conditions.

TEM D Letter from Sal C. Balistreri, Esq., on behalf of Anthony Ching, requesting
shearing of Appeal No. 88-140. Hearing June 29, 1988. Appellant had appealed the
snial of masseur permit at 1750 Geary Boulevard. Upon motion of Commissioner
Duse, the Board voted 5-0 to uphold the department and deny the permit.

[£M E. Letter from Jack Wholey, Esq., on behalf of permit holder, John Woolley, Jr.,
guesting that the Board reconsider its' decision to rehear Appeal No. 88-126.
ie Appellant, Albert R. Ujcic, had protested the issuance of a permit to erect
structure at 236 Randall Street. On June 29, 1988, upon motion of Commissioner
"ior, the Board voted 5-0 to rehear the appeal and scheduled it for hearing on
ily 20, 1988.

- 'JLADOPTION OF FINDINGS ONLY: Public hearing closed.

.EMJL Appeals Nos. 88-168 and 88-169. Hearing July 13, 1988. Upon motion of
nmissioner Melbostad, the Board voted 3-1 (Commissioner House dissented) to
hold the department and grant the permits. The permits were issued to the
deral Home Loan Bank to demolish buildings at 600 California Street and 551

larny Street.

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, JULY 20, 1988 PAGE TWO

PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker,

APPEAL NO. 88-162

ZUNI CAFE, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC HEALTH, Respondent

"[Order on June 15, 1988,
[to cease from the operation
[of an oven at 1658 Market St
[RESOLUTION NO. 88-27.
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY.

(7/26)

APPEAL NO. 88-155

GEORGIA BRITTAN, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[May 27, 1988, to
[Steve Beckerman, permit
[to Demolish a Building
[at 4023 Army Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8706496.
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY.

(7/23)

APPEAL NO. 88-163

2029 FILLMORE STREET TENANTS,

vs. Appellants
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[June 9, 1988, to
[Astoriam Investments, permit
[to Alter a Building at
[2029 Fillmore Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8807669.
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY.

(7/27)

SAN FRANCISCO BUILDING &
CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL,

vs. Appellants
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

APPEAL NO. 88-173

"[Protesting issuance on
[April 8, 1988, to
[Anthony Wong, permit
[to Erect a Structure
[at 3640 18th Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8707470.
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY

(5/28)

ANDRES de la CRUZ, Appellant

vs.
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent

APPEAL NO.

V88-145

TDenial

on May 24, 1988,
[Front Setback Variance
[sought for property
[located at 483 Rolph St.
[VARIANCE CASE NO. 87.579DV
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY.

(7/7)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, JULY 20, 1988

PAGE THREE

APPEAL NO 88-126

ALBERT R. UJCIC, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[April 22, 1988, to
[John Wool ley, Jr., permit
[to Erect a Structure at
[236 Randall St. (87.461D)
[APPLICATION NO. 8709134.
[FOR REHEARING TODAY.

(6/18)

APPEAL NO. 88-167

HENRY LUCERO, Jr., Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Imposition of penalty
[on June 24, 1988,
[for work done without a
[permit at 3335 26th Ave.
[APPLICATION NO. 8806142
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(8/3)

APPEAL NO. 88-178

AMERAH EDAIS, Appellant

vs.
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent

I Denial on June 22, 1988,
[of Mechanical Amusement
[Device permit at
[5001 Third Street.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(8/14)

STAR SHEET METAL & HEATING
CO., INC. Appellants

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
HEALTH DEPT. DISAPPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 88-179

"[Denial on June 20, 1988,
[of permit to Alter
[a Building at
[3445 California St.
[(Hood over Rotisserie)
[APPLICATION NO. 8804778
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(8/14)

IZKO POSLAVSKY, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 88-154

"[Denial on June 7, 1988, of
[permit to Alter a Building
[at 1588 18th Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8709900.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(7/20)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, JULY 20, 1988 PAGE FOUR

APPEAL NO. 88-176

ROBERT P. CLARKE, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[June 17, 1988, to
[Yu Sio Ping & So Sin Yu,
[permit to Alter a Building
[at 623 - 22nd Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8706937.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(8/10)

APPEAL NO. 88-177

GEORGE G. SHELTON, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[June 23, 1988, to
[Raul Raguz, permit to
[Alter a Building at
[2670 Greenwich Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8711562
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(8/14)

APPEAL NO. 88-183

PENNY BROGDEN, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on

[April 22, 1988, to

[Grant-Green Partnership,

[permit to Alter a

[Building at 1416 Grant Ave

[APPLICATION NO. 8802949.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(8/16)

JOSEPH ALLEN KAUFMAN,

vs .
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR,

Appellant
Respondent

APPEAL NO. 88-141

[Determination on May 20, 1988,
[that a Union Meeting Hall is
[considered a Private Club and
[not a Commercial Use under
[applicable North of Market
[Special Use Provisions.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(7/12)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, JULY 20, 1988 PAGE FIVE

SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD

APPEAL NO. 88-155

GEORGIA BRITTAN, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

i #4) vs. [May 27, 1988, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Steve Beckerman, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Demolish a Building

[at 4023 Army Street.
[SITE INSPECTION TUESDAY,
[JULY 19, 1988, AT 5:00 P.M. (7/23)

APPEAL NO. 88-163

2029 FILLMORE STREET TENANTS, [Protesting issuance on

l #5) vs. Appellants [June 9, 1988, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Astoriam Investments, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Alter a Building at

[2029 Fillmore Street.
[SITE INSPECTION TUESDAY,
[JULY 19, 1988, AT 6:00 P.M.. (7/27)

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

ESTHER Y. MARKS PRESIDENT

VICTOR G. MAKRAS VICE PRESIDENT

RALPH D. HOUSE COMMISSIONER

PAUL H. MELBOSTAD COMMISSIONER

BEVERLY J. PRIOR COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: In the case of ap-
peal of denials, revocations and suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken shall
speak first and shall be allowed seven (7) minutes for thier presentation and
three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

In cases of multiple appeals of the same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7) min-
utes to present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal and shall
speak consecutively, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for roal arguments and, for each appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

from the date of a

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date o
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, S

ec-

tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman RD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

Ui^ ^4-f.7?n . ^an Francisco. California 9^102

J OF P!ST APPEAL

City Hail - Rcom 154-A
Franulsco, CA 94102

2^t^2>

Public Library

m±

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 3, 1988

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL

DOCUMENTS DEPT.

AUG 3 W8%

SAN FRANCISCO

pimim i ibpadv

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUEST FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE

[OR ADOPTION OF FINDINGS ONLY: Public hearing closed.

ITEM A Appeal No. 88-126. Hearing July 20, 1988. The appellant, Albert R. Ujcic,
lad appealed the issuance of a permit to erect a structure at 236 Randall Street.
Jpon motion of Vice President Makras, the Board voted 4-1 (President Marks dissented)
to uphold the Department and grant the permit.

REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION OF CONDITION:

ITEM NO. C Appeal No. 87-351. On January 20, 1988, the Board voted 5-0 to uphold an
alteration permit for renovation of a 30-unit apartment house at 1416 Grant Avenue
[>n condition that the permit would be valid for six months. The permit holder seeks
a 5-month extension in order to finish the renovation. (Building Permit Application
No. 8713104).

PUBLIC COGENT: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker.

APPEAL NO. 87-348

HOWARD & MAUREEN SCHAADT &
JEANNE GOLDMAN, Appellants

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[November 25, 1987, to
[Diane Mei-Ling So, permit
[to Alter a Building at
[1836 Pacheco Street.
TAP PL I CAT I ON NO. 8710849.
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY,

(1/16)

APPEAL NO. 88-129

DEBRA SHARABI, Appellant

vs.
POLICE DEPT., Respondent

"[Demi"; on May 6, 1988,
[of Pushcart Peddler permit
[at the southeast corner of
[Geary & Mason Streets.
[FOR REHEARING TODAY.

(6/20)

APPEAL NO. 88-184

LINDA PAK, Appellant

vs.
POLICE DEPT. , Respondent

"[Denial on June 22, 1988, of
[Outcall Massage Service permit
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(8/1)

JAD JABER, Appellant

vs.
HEALTH DEPARTMENT, Respondent
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 88-081

"[Denial on March 24, 1988,
[of Health Department permit
[for a food warehouse
[at lOlOh. York Street.
[FOR REHEARING TODAY.

(5/3)

JIM MULLINS,

Appell

ant

DEPT
CITY

. PUBLIC
PLANNING

WORKS, Respondent
1 DISAPPROVAL

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, AUGUST 3, 1988 PAGE TWO

APPEAL NO. 88-180

SAN FRANCISCO AMBULANCE ASSOC, [Protesting issuance on

vs. Appellants [June 20, 1988, to

DEPT. PUBLIC HEALTH, Respondents [Emergency Resource Group,

[Inc., permit for Routine

[Medical Transport Vehicle

[Service.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/14)

APPEAL NO. 88-139

[Denial on May 31, 1988,

[of permit to Erect a Structure

[at 38 San Jose Avenue.

[APPLICATION NO. 8710539.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/3)

APPEAL NO. 88-172

MICHAEL O'BRIEN, Appellant [Denial on June 24, 1988, of

vs. [permit to Demolish a Building

DEPT. CITY PLANNING, Respondent [at 1578 - 10th Avenue.

[APPLICATION NO. 8714447.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/3)

APPEAL NO. 88-171

MICHAEL O'BRIEN, Appellant [Denial on June 24, 1988, of

vs. [permit to Erect a Structure

DEPT. CITY PLANNING, Respondent [at 1578 - 10th Avenue.

[APPLICATION NO. 8614827.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/3)

APPEAL NO. 88-181

CLAUDIA SHEA, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

vs. [June 22, 1988, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Gow Y. Lee, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Alter a Building at

[315 Corbett Avenue.

[APPLICATION NO. 8805526.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/14)

APPEAL NO. 88-186

HELEN MARTIN, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

vs. [June 24, 1988, to

OtPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [William J. Handel , permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Alter a Building at

L 140 Divisadero Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8806514.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/20)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, AUGUST 3, 1988 PAGE THREE

APPEAL NO. 88-187

DAVID

GREEN,

Appell

ant

DEPT.
CITY

PUBLIC
PLANNING

WORKS, Respon
i APPROVAL

dent

"[Protesting issuance on
[June 6, 1988, to
[Veronica Tedeschi , permit
[to Alter a Building at
[584-586 2nd Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8710671.
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/22)

APPEAL NO. 88-195

JEANNE GHIGLIERI, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

vs. [June 30, 1988, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [R. Sander, permit to

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Alter a Building at

[39 Genoa Place.

[APPLICATION NO. 8800602.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/23)

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

ESTHER Y. MARKS PRESIDENT

VICTOR G. MAKRAS VICE PRESIDENT

RALPH D. HOUSE COMMISSIONER

PAUL H. MELBOSTAD COMMISSIONER

BEVERLY J. PRIOR COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: In the case of ap-
peal of denials, revocations and suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken shall
speak first and shall be allowed seven (7) minutes for thier presentation and
three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttals

In cases of multiple appeals of the same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7) min-
utes to present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal and shall
speak consecutively, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for roal arguments and, for each appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed rot.'ce will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office:

J£ QUESTS FOR REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

m. City and County of San Francisco

Kobert H. Fe.dman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

r2?otlVe Director Room 154-A, City Hall

1415) 554-6720 San Francisco, California 94102

154-A

j, CA 94102

6*Ca^^

Public Library

i- „ _ •-> I

tici* s O L/ti-'T.

AUG I 01989

Fl5 fC>UL4^

\lOltt ^ dftyUUu

MEETING OF THE BUARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

I1 Wednesday! august io, 1988

, 5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL

1ATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUEST FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE

REQUEST FOR JURISDICTION BEYOND THE 15-DAY APPEAL PERIOD:

[TEM A Letter from Nathaniel Abel requesting the Board to take jurisdiction over
jermit issued for a structural addition at 8 Russian Hill Place.

Permit issued July 11 , 1988

Appeal period ended July 26, 1988

Request for jurisdiction received July 29, 1988

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING:

ITEM B Letter from Michael Hallett, on behalf of permit holder, Raul Raguz, requesting
a rehearing of Appeal No. 88-177. Hearing July 20, 1988. The appellant, George
G. Shelton, had appealed the issuance of permit to alter a building at 2670 Greenwich
Street. Upon motion of Commissioner House, the Board voted 4-1 (Commissioner Prior
dissented) to overrule the department and revoke the permit.

ITEM C Letter from Janos Gluck, permit holder, requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 88-183.
Appellant had protested issuance of permit to alter a building at 1416 Grant Avenue.
Upon motion of Commissioner Prior, the Board voted 5-0 to overrule the department and deny
the permit.

FOR ADOPTION OF FINDINGS ONLY: Public hearing closed.

ITEM D Appeal No. 88-139. Hearing August 3, 1988. Denial of permit to erect a
structure at 38 San Jose Avenue. Upon motion of Commissioner Melbostad, the Board voted
l-l (President Marks dissented) to overrule the department and grant the permit
subject to conditions.

REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION OF CONDITION:

[JEM_E_ Appeal No. 87-351. On January 20, 1988, the Board voted 5-0 to uphold an
iteration permit for renovation of 6 30-unit apartment house at 1416 Grant Avenue on
.ondition that the permit would be valiG for six months. The permit holder seeks a

.nth extension in order to finish the renovation (Building Permit Application
lo. 8713104).

JEM F Consideration of letter from Margaret A. Verges for Presidio Avenue Association of
•oncerned Neighbors regarding toxic materials and the Kaiser project site at 2130-2140
I'Farrell Street.

PUBLIC CGWOT: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker,

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, AUGUST 10, 1988 PAGE TWO

APPEAL NO. 88-162

ZUNI CAFE, Appellant [Order on June 15, 1988,

vs. [to cease from the operation

DEPT. PUBLIC HEALTH, Respondent [of an oven at 1658 Market St.

[RESOLUTION NO. 88-27.

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (7/26)

APPEAL NO. 88-176

ROBERT P. CLARKE, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

vs. [June 17, 1988, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Yir Sio Ping & So Sin Yu,

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [permit to Alter a Building

[at 623 - 22nd Avenue.

[APPLICATION NO. 8706937.

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (8/10)

APPEAL NO. 88-127

ERIC SCHWARTZ, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

vs. [May 2, 1988, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Lisle Payne, permit to

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Alter a Building at

[3616 Jackson Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8805429.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/20)

APPEAL NO. 88-184

LINDA PAK, Appellant [Denial on June 22, 1988,

vs. [of Outcall Massage Service

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent [permit.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/1)

APPEAL NO. 88-202

MICHAEL D. FRANKLIN, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

vs. [June 14, 1988, to

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent [David T. Tomas, Pushcart

[Peddler's permit at

[1200 Block of Battery St.

[METER #1219.

[dba "DAVID'S KOSHER FRANKS".

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/11)

APPEAL NO. 88-197

JANET TRAUB, Appellant [Appealing for refund

vs. [of Penalty Imposed on

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [July 18, 15S8, for work

[done at 1229 Washington St.

[APPLICATION NO. 8803036.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/29)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, AUGUST 10, 1988 PAGE THREE

APPEAL NO. 88-196

JOANNA MC CLURE, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

"[Denial on July 12, 1988, of
[permit to Alter a Building
[at 861 Ashbury Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8807644.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(8/23)

APPEAL NO. 88-198

DRAKE GARDNER, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

"[Denial on July 5, 1988, of
[permit to Alter a Building
[at 151-155 Divisadero St.
[APPLICATION NO. 8806311.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(7/29)

APPEAL NO. 88-188

JAMES E. THOMPSON & DIANA KERR,
vs. Appellants
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[June 29, 1988, to
[Vista Villa Investments,
[permit to Erect a Structure,
[at 191 Cresta Vista Drive.
[APPLICATION NO. 8707448.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(8/22)

APPEAL NO. 88-189

JAMES E. THOMPSON & DIANA KERR,
vs. Appellants
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[June 29, 1988, to
[Vista Villa Investments,
[permit to Erect a Structure,
[at 185 Cresta Vista Drive.
[APPLICATION NO. 8707449.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(8/22)

APPEAL NO. 88-190

JAMES E. THOMPSON & DIANA KERR,
vs. Appellants
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[June 29, 1988, to
[Vista Villa Investments,
[permit to Erect a Structure,
[at 181 Cresta Vista Drive.
[APPLICATION NO. 8707450.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(8/22)

JAMES E

THOMPSON
vs.

)EPT. PUBLIC WORKS,

:iTY PLANNING APPROVAL

DIANA KERR,
Appellants
Respondent

APPEAL NO. 38-191

"[Protesting issuance on
[0 r»e 29, 1988, to
[Vista Villa Investments,
[permit to Erect a Structure,
[at 175 Cresta Vista Drive.
[APPLICATION NO. 8707451.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(8/22)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, AUGUST 10, 1988 PAGE FOUR

APPEAL NO. 88-192

JAMES E. THOMPSON & DIANA KERR,
vs. Appellants
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[June 29, 1988, to
[Vista Villa Investments,
[permit to Erect a Structure,
[at 167 Cresta Vista Drive.
[APPLICATION NO. 8707452.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(8/22)

APPEAL NO. 88-193

JAMES E. THOMPSON & DIANA KERR,
vs. Appellants
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[June 29, 1988, to
[Vista Villa Investments,
[permit to Erect a Structure,
[at 161 Cresta Vista Drive.
[APPLICATION NO. 8707453.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(8/22)

APPEAL NO. 88-194

JAMES E. THOMPSON & DIANA KERR,
vs. Appellants
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[June 29, 1988, to
[Vista Villa Investments,
[permit to Erect a Structure,
[at 155 Cresta Vista Drive.
[APPLICATION NO. 8707454.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(8/22)

Consideration of letter to Commissioner Beverly J. Prior from Michael Stanton, AIA,
concerning Proposition M and affordable housing.

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

ESTHER Y. MARKS PRESIDENT

VICTOR 6. MAKRAS VICE PRESIDENT

RALPH D. HOUSE COMMISSIONER

PAUL H. MELBOSTAD COMMISSIONER

BEVERLY J. PRIOR COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: In the case of ap-
peal of denials, revocations and suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken shall
speak first and shall be allowed seven (7) minutes for thier presentation and
three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

In cases of multiple appeals of the same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7) min-
utes to present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal and shall
speak consecutively, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for roal arguments and, for each appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
cific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed rot.-'ce will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS, FOR. REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

6 . City and County of San Francisco

Kobert H. Feidman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

U?c\tlVC D1rector Room 154-A, City Hall

I4i5) 554-6720 San Francisco, California 94102

SOAftO OF PERMIT APPEALS

CITY HALL
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102

^2>

•eiTY LIDRARIAN
Public Library

HEEIINC OF THE B i, A

WEDNESDAY, A: U| / l<g8

1:00 P.H., ROOM 2 CITY HALL

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUEST FC ■ AND OTHER COW

KQUEST FOR JURISDICTION B

A Letter a^d otl" ials from Mc A. Verges, s

Presidio Avenue A< of C ' g that the E

jurisdiction over twc rz : issued alteration building ts for work at

2190 O'Farrell Street on the Kaiser E-Z Stora; ige. Application He. 8

for modification of entrance for parking and addition of new lane.

Permit issued June 21, 1988

Appeal period ended July 6, 1988

Letter received July 25, 1988

ITEM B Application No. 8806779 10 remodel ground floor elevator lobby for new
snack bar at 2190 O'Farrell Street.

Permit issued July 14, 1988

»..

Appeal period ended July 29, 1988

AUG 2 5 1988

Letter received July 25, 1988

5 LIBRARY

ITEM C Letter from Robert Beishline dated August 16,1988, requesting that the Board
take jurisdiction over an Order to Cease Violation of the Planning Code issued by the
Department of City Planning on January 5, 1988. The violations of the Planning Code
regulations are change of copy on an illegal sign and lettering on an awning without
a permit, all at 975 Bush Street.

Order issued January 5, 1988

Appeal period ended( 10-day period in effect still) January 15, 1988

Letter received August 16, 1988

FOR ADOPTION OF FINDINGS ONLY: Public hearing closed.

ITEM D Appeal No. 88-139. Hearing August 3, 1988. Denial of permit to erect
a new 3-unit, 3-occupied level residential building at 38 San Jose Avenue.
Jpon motion of Commissioner Melbostad, the Board voted 4-1 (President Marks
iissented) to overrule the department and to grant the permit subject to
:onditions.

JEM E Appeal No. 88-141. Hearing July 20, 1988. Determination by the
)epartment of City Planning that a union meeting hall is a private club or lodge.
Ipon motion of President Marks the Board voted 4-1 (Commissioner Prior dissented)
;o overrule the department and to deem the proposed use a commercial use not
' private club or lodge.

MJBLIC COMHENT: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker.

MEETING OF THE B; OF PL t t 24, 19 PAGE TWO

• • E£N SO- &

Api lis
vs.
DEPT. P,
CITY PL/

[Protesting issuance on
[No 25, 1927, to
[Di ' Ling So, per
[to Al ter a Building at
[1836 Pacheco Sti a
CAPPLIC^' : 10849.
[FOR FU TODAY

(1/

CAFE, /

vs.
. PUBLIC HEALTH, Respondent

[to

[of an over at 16: . '•■ St

[RE! 88-27.

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY.

(7/26)

CRAIG DAVISON, Appellant
vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, ResDonc

APPEAL NO. 88-206

[Appealing for refund
[of penalty imposed on
[August 5, 1988, for
[work done without permit
[at 3839 Washington Street
[(Presidio Hill Scnool ) .
[APPLICATION NO. 8810471.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(9/14)

IZKO POSLAVSKY, Appellant
vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 88-154

[Denial on June 7, 1988, of
[permit to Alter a Building
fat 1588 18th Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8709900.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(7/20)

ANNA MULROY & DOROTHY COYLE,

vs. Appellants
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 88-208

[Protesting issuance on
[July 25, 1988, to
[John & Nanette Madden,
[permit to Alter a Building
[at 168 Kenwood Way.
[APPLICATION NO. 8805080.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(9/17)

MICHAEL O'BRIEN, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. CITY PLANNING, Respondent

APPEAL NO. 88-172

"[Denial on June 24, 1988, of
[permit to Demolish a Building
[at 1578 - 10th Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8714447.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(8/3)

OF W. BOARD OF Pi - - ' K PAGE TH

A . I. I

vs.
OEPT. Cllt PL- Responded

24, 19€ I, of
t a St i
[at 1578 - 10th A
[AP £

■(. CHIN, A 1
vs =
DEPT. PI Re .

CITY PL'

r £

(9/4;

APPEAL MO. 88-185

GORDON C. WONG, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[February 19, 1988, to
[Stephen Golds tine, permit
[to Alter a Building at
[1331 Green Street,
[APPLICATION NO. 8711803.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(8/17)

APPEAL NO. 88-203

GERALD & PEGGY MEYERS,

vs. Appellants
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on

[July 26, 1988, to

[Ronald

[Alter a Building

[774 Duncan St.

[APPLICATION NO. 8708687

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

Ernst, permit to
at

(9/12)

) Last Item: Consideration of letter to Commissioner Beverly J. Prior from Michael
Stanton, AIA, concerning Proposition M and affordable housing. The Board will
also discuss residential alterations and additions and criteria for review of
permit appeals involving such alterations.

ESTHlR Y, M PRESIDEH1 I

VKW: 6. f VICE PRESIK

RA s COf

PAUL H. f. Ci

BEVERLY J, PR1 (

DC"::- LE 0! COURT REPORTER - 456 "

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL OIL A RECE

NECESSAfi THE CC LNCE OF THE HE^ ER.

B , ARTICLE 1 S &

The order of pre ' as follows: In the ca :'

peal of denials, revocations th€ re\ t : ,

ment, board, co - ion or person from whe : Jer th€ appeal is ta! shall

speak first and shall bo allowed seven (7) ■■ s foi thier p »<

three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

In cases of multiple appeals of the same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7) min-
utes to present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal and shall
speak consecutively, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for roal arguments and, for each appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings,

D . _, , City and County of San Francisco

Kobert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

^cutive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

1415) 554-6720 Sdn Francisco, California 94102

_^H--¥-i-rm77TT7Tmi

Public Library

530
ei/fes

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 31, 1988

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL

DOC U M £ N To D t ,~T.

MUG 3 0 198a

SaiM hKANCISCO
PHUl in l IRD /v r>\s

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUEST FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE

REQUEST FOR REHEARING:

ITEM A: Letter from Bob Clarke, appellant, requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 88-176.
Hearing August 10, 1988. Mr. Clarke had protested the issuance of a permit to alter a
building at 623-22nd Avenue. Upon motion of Commissioner House, the Board voted 4-0
to uphold the department and grant the permit subject to conditions. Commissioner Prior
was absent for this appeal.

REQUEST FOR JURISDICTION BEYOND THE 15-DAY APPEAL PERIOD:

ITEM B: Letter from Alice Devine requesting the Board to take jurisdiction over a
permit issued for pushcart peddler located at N.W. corner of Spear and Howard Street

Permit issued

Appeal period ended

Request for jurisdiction received

June 7, 1988
June 22, 1988
August 22, 1988

PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to (3) minutes for each speaker.

JEANNE GHIGLIERI, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 88-195

[Protesting issuance on
[June 30, 1988, to
[R. Sander, permit to
[Alter a Building at
[39 Genoa Place.
[APPLICATION NO. 8800602.
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY

(8/23)

LIEN KIM NGUYEN, Appellant

vs.
POLICE DEPT., Respondent

APPEAL NO. 38-205

"[Denial on July 25, 1988,
[of a Masseuse permit at
[451 O'Farrell Street.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(9/14)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, AUGUST 31, 1988 PAGE TWO

APPEAL NO. 88-209

RAYMOND I. WILSON, Appellant [Suspension on July 25, 1988

vs. [of Driver Public Vehicle

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent [permit for 30 days to be

[held in abeyance during a
[one year probation period.
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/18)

APPEAL NO. 88-214

LISA JURINA, Appellant [Denial on August 3, 1988,

vs. [of a Masseuse permit for

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent [work at 1 Colin Place, dba,

["Aloha Spa".

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/24)

APPEAL NO. 88-210

WILLIAM H. BILLINGSLEY, [Denial on August 4, 1988,

vs. Appellant [of permit to Alter a

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Building at 1801 Broadway

[Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8808882.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/18)

APPEAL NO. 88-213

VICTORIA VASSELLO, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

vs. [August 8, 1988, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Giampiero Pucci , permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Alter a Building at

[480 Princeton Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8806932.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/24)

LAST ITEM: Public Comment: Presentation shall be limited to (3) minutes for each
speaker.

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

ESTHER Y. MARKS PRESIDENT

VICTOR 6. MAKRAS VICE PRESIDENT

RALPH D. HOUSE COMMISSIONER

PAUL H. MELBOSTAD COMMISSIONER

BEVERLY J. PRIOR COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: In the case of ap-
peal of denials, revocations and suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken shall
speak first and shall be allowed seven (7) minutes for thier presentation and
three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

In cases of multiple appeals of the same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7) min-
utes to present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal and shall
speak consecutively, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for roal arguments and, for each appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before tne Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL BOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific C>ate by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room.no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call t'^e Board office
at 554-67 20 for scheduling or ether information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS. FOR REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

D City and County of San Francisco

Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(415) 554-6720 San Francisco, California 94102

BOArtD OF PERMIT APPEALS

CiTY HALL
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94101

;

Pub^"c Library /C^<<2^.

30
2.

(hfjJL

<L,

rtd County of San Francisco

UlX

documents de,-,.
Board of Permit Appeals

PUBLIC NOTICE

DOCUMENTS DEPT.

SEP 7 138S
San FkAiNK,itooo

PUBLIC UbKAP.v

NO MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS HAS BEEN SCHEDULED FOR
SEPTEMBER 7, 1988.

THE NEXT MEETING OF THE BOARD IS SCHEDULED FOR SEPTEMBER 14, 1988,
AT 5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL.

ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING SCHEDULING OR ANY OTHER PERMIT APPEALS
MATTERS MAY BE DIRECTED TO THE STAFF AT 554-6720 IN THE BOARD
OFFICE, ROOM 154-A, CITY HALL.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

/^^L^

ROBERT H. FETDMAN
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

DATE OF THIS NOTICE: SEPTEMBER 2, 1988

(415) 554-6720

Room 154 A City Kail

San Francisco 94102

kudiic Liorary /l/

MEETING OF THE BOARD OP PERM IT APPEALS
WEDNESDAY/ SEPTEMBER 14, 1988
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL

DOCUMENTS DErr.

SAN FHAlNfeiaoO

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUEST FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING:

ITEM A Letter from Robert W. Passmore, Zoning Administrator, requesting rehearing of
Appeal No. 88-154. Dates of hearing July 20, 1988, and August 24, 1988. The appellant
Izko Poslavsky, had appealed the denial of permit to alter a building at 1588-18th Ave.
Upon motion of Vice President Makras, the Board voted 5-0 to overrule the department
and grant the permit.

UJ1JL Letter from Anna Mulroy and Dorothy Coyle requesting rehearing of
Appeal No. 88-208^ Hearing August 24, 1988. The appellants had protested the issuance
of permit to alter a building at 168 Kenwood Way. Upon motion of Commissioner House,
the Board voted 3-2 (Marks and Melbostad dissented) to uphold the department and grant
the permit. Four votes being needed to overrule, the department is upheld and the
permit granted.

FOR ADOPTION OF FIND I NGS ONLY: Public hearing closed

ITEM C Appeal No.V88-145. Hearing July 20, 1988. The appellant, Andres de la Cruz,
protested the denial of a variance for property located at 483 Rolph Street. Upon
motion of Commissioner Prior, the Board voted 5-0 to overrule the Zoning
Administrator and grant the permit subject to conditions.

CORRESPONDENCE:

ITEM D Letter from Thomas J. Mellon
ent tc the subject property at
of Penmit Appeals, its members and i
by way of further procfedings, rehear
the record to accurately reflect the
U its hearing on August 3, 19S8, upo
*oted 4-1 (President Marks dissented
>ermit suoject to conditions. On Aug
'•akras, the Boarc voted 3-2 (Marks
)f fact and conditions supporting

on behalf of Len Mejia, the neighbor
38 San Jose Avenue, calling "upon the Board
ts staff to take any and all necessary action,
ing of this matter or otherwise, to correct
proceedings that have occurred in this matter."
n motion of Commissioner Melbostad, the Board
) to overrule the department and grant the
ust 24, 1988, upon motion of Vice-President
and Melbostad dissenting) to adopt findings
the decision of August 3, 1988.

pUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to (3) minutes for each speaker,

.INDA PAK, Appellant

vs.
0L ICE DEPT., Respondent

APPEAL NO. 88- 184

"[Denial on June 22, 1988, of
[Outcall Massage Service permit
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(8/1)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, SEPTEMBER 14, 1988 PAGE TWO

APPEAL NO. 88-221

PHANNIPA BRAXTON, Appellant

vs.
POLICE DEPT. , Respondent

"[Denial on August 3, 1988,
[of a Masseuse Trainee permit
[at 451 O'Farrell Street.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(9/26)

APPEAL NO. 88-204

GRIFFIN V. ALANSON,

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS,

Appellant
Respondent

[Imposition of penalty
[imposed on July 29, 1988,
[for work done without a
[permit at 422 Haight St.
[APPLICATION NO. 8711660.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(9/14)

APPEAL NO. 88-174

DANIEL J. OPPENHEIM, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

"[Denial on June 30, 1988, of
[permit to Alter a Building
[at 461 Ashbury Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8802014.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(8/3)

APPEAL NO. 88-216

ROBERT F. BARKER,

vs .
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS,

Appellant
Respondent

"[Denial on August 16, 1988, of
[permit to Alter a Building
[at 715 Schrader Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8806906.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(9/25)

APPEAL NO. 88-219

JAMES L. GATTEN, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL

[Denial on August 16, 1988, of
[permit to Alter a Building at
[at 1975 - 8th Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8808193.
[FOR HEARING TOC .

(9/25)

STEVEN & ALBA SCHUSCHEREBA,

vs. Appellants
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 88-211

[Protesting issuance on
[July 27, 1988, to
[J. Orecchia & N. Lopez,
[permit to Alter a Building
[at 551 46th Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8801526.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(9/19)

NICK BERNARTE, ROSE
NAPOLEON CABALUNA,

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS,

APPEAL NO. 88-215

CABALUNA &
Appellants

Respondent

[Protesting issuance on
[August 3, 1988, to
[Phillip Griffin, permit
[to Alter a Building at
[662 & 662A Natoma St.
[APPLICATION NO. 8808976
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(9/25)

MEETING UF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, SEPTEMBER 14, 1988 PAGE THREE

APPEAL NO. 88-217

JULIET CUATON, Appellant ~~ [^Protesting issuance on

vs. [August 10, 1988, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Elba, Henry & Mary Lucero,

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [permit to Alter a Building

[at 3335 - 26th Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8806142.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/25)

APPEAL NO. 88-218

NICKOL/S A. DI/tflAN, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

[August £J, 1988, to
Respondent [Larry Wassermen, permit

[to Alter a Building at
[2960/ Van/Ness Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8807974.
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/25)

APPEAL NO. 88-220

JOE & JACQUELINE GOLDMAN, [Protesting issuance on

vs. Appellants [August 4, 1988, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Lew & Hirolso Makino,

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [permit to Alter a Building

[at 415 El Camino Del Mar.

[APPLICATION NO. 8811190.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/26)

) PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to (3) minutes for each speaker,

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

CITY HALL
IAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102

&^C~^

Public Library

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS documents dept.
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 1988 SEP ~ 7 m*

San fkajmcisco

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUEST FOR REHEARING, AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE

REQUEST FOR REHEARING:

ITEM A Letter from Genoa Place Neighbors requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 88-195,
Hearing August 31, 1988. The appellants had protested the issuance of permit to
alter a building at 39 Genoa Place. Upon motion of Vice-President Kakras, the
Board voted 5-0 to uphold the department and grant the permit subject to conditions,

REQUEST FOR JURISDICTION1 BEYOND THE 15-DAY APPEAL PERIOD:

ITEM B Letter from Mark A. Stevens, AIA, requesting the Board take jurisdication
Dver an Order to Cease Violation of the Planning Coae issued May 26, 1988, for
removal of banners in front of Spuntino's Restaurant at 524 Van Ness Avenue.

Order issued

Appeal period ended

Request for jurisdiction received

May 26, 1988
June 10, 1988
September 20, 1988

PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to (3) minutes for each speaker.

JIM MULLINS, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 88-139

"[Denial on May 31, 1988,

[of permit to Erect a Structure

[at 38 San Jose Avenue.

[APPLICATION NO. 8710539.

LF0R REHEARING TODAY. (7/3)

YOUNG ANN KIM & IN KYUNG KIM,

vs. Appellants
HEALTH DEPARTMENT, Respondent
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 87-302

"[Denial on October 9, 1987,
[of permit to Operate a
[Restaurant at 92 Judah St.
[(Joky's Place) .
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY.

(11/28)

DEBRA SHARABI, Appellant

vs.
POLICE DtPT., Respondent

APPEAL NO. 88-129

[Denial on May 6, 1988,
Lof Pushcart Peddler permit
[at the southeast corner of
[ Geary & Mason Streets.
LFOR REHEARING TODAY.

(6/20)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, SEPTEMBER 28, 1988 PAGE TWO

APPEAL NO. 88-217

JULIET CUATON, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[August 10, 1988, to
[Elba, Henry & Mary Lucero,
[permit to Alter a Building
[at 3335 - 26th Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8806142.
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY.

(9/25)

APPEAL NO. 88-219

JAMES L. GATTEN, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL

"[Denial on August 16, 1988, of
[permit to Alter a Building at
[at 1975 - 8th Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8808193.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(9/25)

APPEAL NO. 88-226

KAR TUNG SEE, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Appealing for refund
[of penalty imposed on
[August 29, 1988, for work
[done without a permit at
[390 26th Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8805034.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(10/8)

APPEAL NO. 88-223

NATHANIEL S. PETERS, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL

"[Denial on August 9, 1988, of
[permit to Alter a Building
[at 1825 Pine Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8709950.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(10/1)

APPEAL NO. 88-228

BETTY KLAUSNER, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

"[Denial on August 16, 1988, of
[permit to Alter a Building
[at 978-980 Guerrero St.
[APPLICATION NO. 8807170.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(10/10)

JOHN & JULIE HUGHES,

vs. Appellants
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 88-224

[Protesting issuance on
[August 15, 1988, to
[Barry & Vicky Potthoff,
[permit to Alter a Building
[at 2340 Cecilia Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8717614.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(10/3)

PUBLIC CC#tOT: Presentation shall be limited to (3) minutes for each speaker,

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

ESTHER Y. MARKS PRESIDENT

VICTOR 6. MAKRAS VICE PRESIDENT

RALPH D. HOUSE COMMISSIONER

PAUL H. MELBOSTAD COMMISSIONER

BEVERLY J. PRIOR COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTIOH 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: In the case of ap-
peal of denials, revocations and suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken shall
speak first and shall be allowed seven (7) minutes for thier presentation and
three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

In cases of multiple appeals of tne same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7) min-
utes to present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal and shall
speak consecutively, anc tne permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for roal arguments anc, for eacr appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

Any written submittals must be received by the Board not later than five days
before tne appointed hearing, with copies of said written submittals receivec
by the Departmental representatives and other principals by the same day.

Tne Boarc shall consider the oepartmental letter oeemed as read, anc such must
De receivedvby the Board no later than two cays prior to the appointed hearing.

Each member present at a meeting shall vote for or against tne matter before
them unless a commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a
majority of the members present. (Amended April 20, 1988)

SPECIAL ROTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room.no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARIN6

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

5*15) 554-6720 San Francisco, California 9^102

CJTY HALL

&!*I***^9^>*m A7<?€aJ

Public Library

2 -8P

DOCUMENTS DEPX

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS 0CT5 (
,, WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 5,1988 san m«^o

& CiH^jLi^ PUBLIC UbKARv

5;00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL

s/g§

1ATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE

REQUEST FOR REHEARING;

ITEM A Letter from Thomas J. LaLanne, Esq., on behalf of appellant, Daniel Oppenheim,
requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 88-174. Hearing September 14, 1988. The appellant
lad appealed the denial of permit to alter a building at 461 Ashbury Street. Upon
notion of Vice President Makras, the Board voted 5-0 to uphold the department and deny
the permit.

[TEM B Letter from Robert W. Passmore, Zoning Administrator, requesting rehearing of
\ppeal No. 88-228. Hearing September 28, 1988. The appellant had appealed the denial
3f a permit to add a cooktop to a social room in a home at 978-980 Guerrero Street.

:0R ADOPTION OF FINDINGS ONLY: Public hearing closed.

ITEM C Appeal No. 88-139. Rehearing September 28, 1988. Denial of permit to erect a
lew 3-unit, 3-occupied level residential building at 38 San Jose Avenue. Upon motion of
Commissioner Melbostad, the Board voted 4-1 (President Marks dissented) to overrule the
department and grant the permit subject to conditions.

PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to (3) minutes for each speaker.

APPEAL WO. 88-242

ROY K. LEE, Appellant [Appealing for refund

vs. [of penalty imposed on

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [September 12, 1988, for

[work at 2244-50 Mason St.

[APPLICATION NO. 8811367.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (10/22)

APPEAL WO. 88-170

ROLF LEWIS & MARTIN AUSTIN, [Protesting issuance on

vs. Appellants [June 9, 1988, to the

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Hamlin School, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Alter a Building at

[2120 Broadway Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8804913

[FOR -AY. (8/3)

EAL WO )

HIST ASSOC, lial on \ gust 31, 1988,

s. " its [of <it to Alter a

fj. | at 711 Grant Ave.

06751.
[FOR HEARING fOOAY, i' 10/10)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, OCTOBER 5, 1988, PAGE TWO

APPEAL NO. 88-232

PAUL DUDUM, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL

"[Denial on August 31, 1988,
[of permit to Demolish a
[Building at 535 Mission St.
[APPLICATION NO. 8806487.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(10/10)

APPEAL NO. 88-236

ANTON

DEPT.

JOHANNE MUZIK,

vs.
PUBLIC WORKS,

Appellant
Respondent

"[Denial on September 2, 1988,
[of permit to Alter a Building
[at 60 Bret Harte Terrace.
[APPLICATION NO. 8808909.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(10/16)

APPEAL NO. 88-233

JAMES NEWMAN, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[August 23, 1988, to
[Ike Guillory, permit to
[Demolish a Building at
[1390 So. Van Ness Ave.
[APPLICATION NO. 8809286
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(10/11)

APPEAL NO. 88-235

JOHN S. MCGRAW, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[August 22, 1988, to
[Stanley Dintcho, permit
[to Alter a Building
[at 2253 Mission St.
[APPLICATION NO. 8715672
[FOR HEARING T0Prv

(10/12)

APPEAL NO. 88-237

BEN LEE, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting suance on
[August 24, 1938, to
[A. Kotlyar * i Kaupman,
[permit to Demolish a
[Building at 2925A Larkin St,
[APPLICATION NO. 8809293.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(10/16)

APPEAL NO. 88-238

SEN LEE, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS,

i ?u

'ent

/AL

[Protesting issuance on
[August 24, 1388, to
[A. Kotlyar & F. Kaupman,

' t to Erect a Structure
[at 5A Larkin St.

P! [CATION NO. 8701915.
NG TODAY.

(10/16)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, OCTOBER 5, 1988, PAGE THREE

APPEAL NO. 88-240

BRUNO CARAMATTI, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[August 24, 1988, to
[A. Kotlyar & F. Kaupman,
[permit to Erect a Structure
[at 2925A Larkin St.
[APPLICATION NO. 8701915.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(10/17)

LINDA MAYNE, Appellant

vs.
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR,

Respondent

APPEAL NO. V88-207

[Denial on July 28, 1988,
[of Rear Yard Variance sought
[for property located at
[61 Jordan Avenue.
[VARIANCE CASE NO. 88.155V
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(9/17)

Consideration of Resolution on Implementation of the Non-Smoking Ordinance
For adoption.

PUBLIC COJfOT: Presentation shall be limited to (3) minutes for each person.

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

ESTHER Y. MARKS PRESIDENT

VICTOR 6. MAKRAS VICE PRESIDENT

RALPH D. HOUSE COMMISSIONER

PAUL H. MELBOSTAD COMMISSIONER

BEVERLY J. PRIOR COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTIOW 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: In the case of ap-
peal of denials, revocations and suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken shall
speak first and shall be allowed seven (7) minutes for thier presentation and
three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

In cases of multiple appeals of the same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7) min-
utes tc present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal and shall
speak consecutively, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for real arguments and, for each appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The . shall conside- the departmental letter deemed as reac, and such must
oe received xb> the Boa re nc later than two cays prior to the appointed hearing.
S

Each r-;-:>er present at a meeting shall vote for or against tne matter before
them unless a commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a
majority of the members present. (Amended April 20, 1988)

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by ~s and . as well as by tw,s Board not later

^n f-!ve days before the hearing.

tice of f lie I / , U call.- ies at least five

prior to the f hearing. In the is -d to a

ing offi 4 J tc or-

* , ional led not i II t . PI i cal 1 3 " i ce

: ' } formation during res s-

pi ete Rules of the Board i ' " . "fke.

in t lays from tl " " e »f a

i .'s In peal. See ; le 5, Sec-
'e vs ings.

- i

(

• ' n ' r APPEAL S

' >r I -A, City Hall

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEAL!

CITY HALL
•AN FRANCISCO, CA 94108

fr-aa^

jgj-TY LIBRARIAN.
Public Library

meeting of the board of permit appeals

Wednesday; October 19, 1988

5:00 p.m., room 282, city hall

DOCUMENTS BEET.

SAN FRANCISCO
PUBLIC HBRARV

rERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUEST FOR REHEARINGS AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE:

JEST FOR REHEARIN6:

A A: Letter from Nathaniel S. Peters, requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 88-223,

ring September 28, 1988. The appellant had appealed the denial of a permit to

2r a building at 1825 Pine Street. Upon motion of President Marks, the Board
2d 5-0 to uphold the department and deny the permit.

& ST FOR JURISDICTION BEYOND THE 15-DAY APPEAL PERIOD:

* B^ Letter from Richard S. Rose, requesting the Board take jurisdiction over
Police Department denial of Second Hand Dealer Permit at 7253 Geary Blvd.

Order issued

Appeal period ended

Request for jurisdiction received

September 19, 1988
October 4, 1988
October 5, 1988

H C: Letter from Richard Connolly, requesting the Board take jurisdiction over

nit tc ' ^c'- a Building at 590 36th Avenue. This permit was originally issued on

~y 8, 1 d pretested by Mr. Connolly on February 17, 1988. The Board heard

d :n March 16, 1988 voted 4-0 " ssioner Fung was absent) to uphold

-t. tly Cit> Planning learned that the Fukuda decision applied and

t; the permit ! 3d been j perly without Prop M. findings.

st 23, 1988, City Planning notified the Bureau that it had made findings of

•■:> with Prop m and equested that <mit be suspended so that a new

1 period Id run to ;rap"!e an> *stor to file a protest appeal.

■ ■ ted

ror .en received

August 31 , 1
September 15, 1988
October 5, 1988

I OF I 1:

ic " ■ : 1< L

|: . • -earing 0c 5, >8. ~ ?sting :e of pei

'■:- ' n : jol at 2120 B 'ay. jr. o£ \ i : \ Jent K'H

: '• - 1 ' : se diss i) ro grant the permit s

■•• vT: . all be - to (3) minutes For each speaker,

tEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, OCTOBER 19, 1988

PAGE TWO

LINDA PAK, Appellant

vs.
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent

APPEAL NO. 88-184

"[Denial on June 22, 1988, of
[Outcall Massage Service permit,
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(8/1)

APPEAL NO. 88-243

ALICE COOKSON, Appellant

vs.
POLICE DEPARTMENT,

Respondent

[Protesting issuance on
[June 7, 1988, to
[Victoria Motta, of
[Pushcart Peddler's permit
[at the Northwest corner of
[Spear and Howard Streets
[(120 Howard Street).
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(10/25)

LUNG DEP HOM, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

APPEAL NO. 88-245

[Appealing for refund of
[penalty imposed on
[September 20, 1988, for
[work done without a permit
[at 3228 17th Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8814138.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(10/30)

ITEMS 6A through 6E shal 1 be heard toge ther.

APPEAL NO. 88-156

I KONG METRO REALTY CO., INC.
vs. Appellant
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, R€ :nt
CITY PLANNING

[Revocation on May 4, 1988,

[of permit to Alter a

[Building at 2987 -38th Ave.

[APPLICATION NO. 8803251.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/25)

APPEAL NO. 38-157

-. '' , INC.
vs. : "ant

PUBL!

JNG METRO REALTY CO. , '.'

■
KS, F Jem

"[Revocation on May 4, 19
[of permit to Alter a
at 3701 U:l3c St.
NO. S>: 3253

APPEAL NO. 88-158

"[Revocation on May 4, 1988,

[of permit to Alter a
[Building at 3712 Ulloa St.

LICATION NC. 8803252.
[FOP - DAY. (7/25)

:_ NO. 38-159

0. , INC.
int
dent

: . inc.

EPT. WORKS,

ITY ?

lay 4,
it to Alter a
lding at 3722 Ulloa

-07795.
[FOR HEARING (7/25)

\l NO. 88

[Revocation on viy 4, .

[of , -• mi t tc \1 ter a
[Building at 3734 Ulloa St.
[APPLICATION NO,

RING 25)

ING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, OCTOBER 19, 1988

PAGE THREE

S 7A and 7B shall be heard together.

APPEAL NO. 88-244

C. PILCHER, Appellant
vs.
PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[September 14, 1988, to
[Roseanna Hughes, permit
[to Erect a Structure at
[4660 25th Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8801529
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(10/29)

APPEAL NO. 88-253

lYN H. AHO, Appellant

vs.
. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[September 14, 1988, to
[Roseanna Hughes, permit
[to Erect a Structure at
[4660 25th Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8801529
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(11/8)

8A through 8D shall be heard together.

APPEAL NO. 88-246

IRA MESKUNAS
vs.
. PUBLIC WORKS,

P.A.D.S.,

Appellants

Respondent

PLANNING APPROVAL

MESKUNAS & P.A.D.S.,
vs. pellants
PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

PLANNING APPROVAL

i MESKUNAS & P.A.D.S. ,
vs. ?:!dnts
1C WORKS, Respondent
NG APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[September 6, 1988, to
[the SF Housing Authority,
[permit to Erect a Structure
[1717 Eddy Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8716547S.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

APPEAL NO. 88-247

[Protesting issuance on

■p temper 6, 1938, to
[the SF Housing Authority,
[permit to Erect a Structure
[1150 Scott Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8716554S.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

APPEAL NO. 58-248

[Protest'* r.g issuance on
[September 6, 1988, to

[the SF Housing Authority,
[permit to Erect a Structure
[1851 Eddy Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 87 16557 S.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(10/31)

i MESKUNAS & P.A.D.S.,
vs. '

: • ' .

iING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 88-

[Prc _. on

[St ber 6, 3, to

= SF Housing ' ity,

t to Erect a Structure
[17 50 Turk Street.

[APPLICATION NO.
[FOR HEARING TO

fc/16563S.

(10/31)

EIIN6 OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, OCTOBER 19, 1986

PAGE FOUR

. H. A. R. P. , Appellants

vs.
EPT. PUBLIC WORK3, Respondent

;ty planning approval

APPEAL NO. 8£ 250

[Protesting issuance or,
[September 7, 1988 , to
|_Mc3 fi i La i or , pe rm i t
[to Erect a Structure at
i_ I7S9 9t' Avenue
[APPLlCATION NC. 8711839
;FOP. KEAKIN2 TODAY.

(11/1

ENRY & LILV CHAN, Appellant

vs.
DNING ADMINISTRATOR,

Responder t

APPEAL NO- 88-251

[ Order on September 9, 1988,
[to Cease Violation of the
[Planning Code for property
[located at 2943 Balboe Si"

"FOR HEAP1N3 TODAY.

I :

DNALD J. RICE. ADpeHant

i •

NG ADMINISTRATOF .

pondent

APPEAL NC. Y88-239

.Denial or August 26, 1
[of Rear Yard 5 Jnscreenec
[Parki ng variance soug t
[for proDerty located at
L775 Noe St./8-H ::- : jrr

-:an:s case nc. 87 .5

RING T0":^v.

(10

ublic cok

ese )n shall : d (3) ites for ea : »akei

r" rv- :

SPECIAL MEETING OF THE

APPEAL NO. 88-237

K S , Re s f
LTY F

■ : issuance or.
I- *88,

• i "" & F . f

c to C »n a

2925A Larkin St.

[ON NC.
■" S I T £ INSPECTION MONDAY,

HJS, AT 8: 3C A.M.

APPEAL HOS.

:N I E, ^pellant *

IATTI , Appellant

• " . " . t

itest i : ce on

- 24, 1988, to

\ A . Ko 1 1 y a r & F . K a : ; n .

t to Erect a Structure

- • kin St.

N NO. 3?019;5.
;SiTE |

•R 17, . :. i " ; : a.m.

r. of the Permit >lders - ■ peals we^e :c lued and will be

*>"d t , -r on ;.. ' ber 26, L988.)

fitf 0 in BO&RB 0 PtRKil APP£A S

ESTHER Y. HARKS PRESIDENT

VICTOR 6. KAKRAS VICE PRESIDENT

RALPH D. HOI CO^i SSI ONER

PAUL H. KLBOSTAI) COKBISSlOfO

BEVERLY J. PRIOR COM 1 SSI BO

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-989$

THE PRESIDING OFFICER MILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVEP
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE 0? THE HEARING REPORTER.

*>•' r-' OF PERMIT APPLALS RULES, ARTiaE 1, SECT I Oft 5

Trie order c' presen cation of ar appeal shall be as follows: In the case o*" ap-
peal of denials, revocations anc suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, peer:, commission or person fron wncse c:-.r the appeal is ta*er shal
spea* f,rv-c anc snail Pe all owe c sever. (7j minutes for thier p!rtser,vctior anc
tnree (3) minutes for rebuttal.

he appellant whose permit has Deer. denied, revoked or suspended snail be al-
owec sever (7) minutes for ore". ar^R- : =r: three 3 minutes for rebuttal

ir the :ase of protest i:^€r:s, the protestor shall spea* ."'rs: anc shall Di
3 " . :~>zr 7 ii r."-- tc present oral argument anc :r'r-. 5 minutes
reDul - . ar tne oe-T.it nclce" snail pe allowed seven (7; rr to prese-;

ora" arpunent anc three (3) minutes for rebuttal. Tne bc^c-c ma> request t
-.".-.-.- *.a response at Us own discretion.

lr jit pie appeals Df me same aeparunental ast^or or permit t

oe joined and the ants shall sacfr be alienee seven (7; Min-

utes present oral a -._ . ts a*c tnree (3) minutes each for rebuttal anr shall
speai :or •>, and tne t : »r hall oe allowec sever (7) minutes

for roi ", r'vr - .3 minutes for rebuttal.

0ther persons siring tc speak before the or an appeal maj speak once

for up to three (3) -s.

Anv «r . -- mittals must oe -eceivec by the Board not "ate- thar five days

tn« -c hearing, with copies o*' sa^c writter Ltals recei*

.-■- al *fit"ve: a^c c*. -it- principals by the sar

' ' :. --- : : - . r the c il lette : . : anc sucr

^r 'e:e .-; :.. the : . c no later tnan twe oays prior to the : : :

i at » . r»c shall rote for or against t 'ore

t.nen jr.less a er is excused from voting oy a motion adopted b> a

majority of the ars f t. 'Amended April 20, 1988)

:^ " - tc the Board's *ul ;e or arguments in *rit ist

j 5) : •: : ) »ot later

: r.a n f i v e sa y s i s

: . s ; ■ - ■ ■ ' s a sent to a 1 1 i 1 e a s t f

:-r 'o of In ' ; >nt iat a matter is cc d to a

": :'/ 3 ?unced to the . ?s in the

I :ice will be sent. Please call the Beard office

at • , j or - ■ ' . g regul a r bus s .

plete Rules of the Board are available for Feview at ard office.

Wr i tUn . " . . be ; 1 ?d *i t" ys from the te of a

decision and u> be filed only bj . pals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-

tion 6 for complete rule on js.

:v and County of San Franci

H bert H. -: *D S PERMIT MS

...... -,»,-. 1

; - :

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS
CITY HALL
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 941^

Public Library

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 26, 1988

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL

TERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUEST FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE

UEST FOR JURISDICTION BEYOND THE 15-DAY APPEAL PERIOD:

I A: Letters from Jan Reding, President of the Grant Lombard Condominium Association,
J. Branning and Lenard G. Weiss, owners of condominiums at 373 Lombard Street,
uesting the Board to take jurisdiction over permit issued for construction at
Lombard Street.

ooc.r-. eye.

Permit issued July 28, 1988

OCT 2 1 1988

Appeal period ended August 12, 1988

Requests for jurisdiction received October 14, 1988 &

October 18, 1988
■M B: Appeal No. 88-170, Hamlin School, 2120 Broadway. Adoption of findings.

1IC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to (3) minutes for each speaker.

EMS 3A through 3C shall be heard together.

N LEE, Appellant

vs.
PT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
TY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 88-237

"[Protesting issuance on
[August 24, 1988, to
[A. Kotlyar & F. Kaupman,
[permit to Demolish a
[Building at 2925A Larkin St.
[APPLICATION NO. 8809293.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(10/16)

:N LEE, Appellant

vs.
LPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
ITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 88-238

WN0 CARAMATTI, Appellant

vs.
:.PT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
ITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[August 24, 1988, to
[A. Kotlyar & F. Kaupman,
[permit to Erect a Structure
[at 2925A Larkin St.
[APPLICATION NO. 8701915.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

APPEAL NO. 88-240

[Protesting issuance on
[August 24, 1988, to
[A. Kotlyar & F. Kaupman,
[permit to Erect a Structure
[at 2925A Larkin St.
[APPLICATION NO. 8701915.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

*0K WAI LEE, Appellant

vs.
-PT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

APPEAL NO. 88-260

"[Imposition of penalty on
[October 11, 1988, for
[work done without a permit
[at 3659-3661 Mission St.
[APPLICATION NO. 8806728.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(10/16)

(10/17)

(11/20)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, OCTOBER 26, 1988 PAGE TWO

APPEAL NO. 88-259

IROSHI FUKUDA, Appellant

vs.
EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
ITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[May 1, 1987, to Edwin Lum,
[permit to Erect a Structure
[at 148-18th Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8604857.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(11/20)

APPEAL NO. 88-261

OBERT YICK COMPANY, INC.,

vs. Appellant
EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
ITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL

"[Denial on October 4, 198ti,
[of permit to Alter a Building
[at 1915 Fillmore Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8807195.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(11/12)

APPEAL NO. 88-224

OHN & JULIE HUGHES,

vs. Appellants
EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
ITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[August 15, 1988, to
[Barry & Vicky Potthoff,
[permit to Alter a Building
[at 2340 Cecilia Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8717614.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(10/3)

APPEAL NO. 88-227

NN & RICHARD CARNEY,

vs. Appellants
EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Protesting issuance on

[August 18, 1988, to

[John Hung, permit to

[Alter a Building at
[2306 Lake Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8812071.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(10/9)

AVID S. GAST & ASSOCIATES,

vs. Appellants
ONING ADMINISTRATOR,

Respondent

APPEAL NO. Y88-256

"TDenial on September 19, 1988,
[of Rear Yard Variance sought
[for property located at
[1908-1908^ Green Street.
[VARIANCE CASE NO. 88.045V.
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/8)

APPEAL NO. V88-257

"^Protesting issuance on
[September 21, 1988, to
[Mark Brand, of Rear Yard
[Variance sought for
[property located at
[2522 Octavia Street.
[VARIANCE CASE NO. 88.439V.
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/12)

JBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to (3) minutes for each speaker.

SPECIAL MEETING

ARLAN & JUDITH KOCH,

vs. Appellants
ONING ADMINISTRATOR,

Respondent

DNALD J. RICE, Appellant

vs.
)NING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent

[Denial of rear yard/lot size variance
[for 775 Noe/8-10 Rayburn.
[Variance 87.511EV.
[SITE INSPECTION, Monday,
[OCTOBER 31 198Q» *t 8:30 A.M.

Ml Jii .■■ fa—i i

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

ESTHER Y. MARKS PRESIDENT

VICTOR 6. MAKRAS VICE PRESIDENT

RALPH D. HOUSE COMMISSIONER

PAUL H. MELBOSTAD COMMISSIONER

BEVERLY J. PRIOR COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: In the case of ap-
peal of denials, revocations and suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken shall
speak first and shall be allowed seven (7) minutes for thier presentation and
three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

In cases of multiple appeals of the same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7) min-
utes to present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal and shall
speak consecutively, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for roal arguments and, for each appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(415) 554-6720 San Francisco, California 94102

c^.

mYnniipmnii'iiN

Public Library

P30

: THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 9, 1988

pp.

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL

i \ \m%

) MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUEST FOR REHEARINGS AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE:

REQUEST FOR JURISDICTION BEYOND THE 15-DAY APPEAL PERIOD:

ITEM A: Letter from M. Adele Lafrenz requesting the Board to take jurisdiction over
the demolition permit issued for a building at 4004 Geary Boulevard. (APPLICATION
NO. 9716671).

Order issued

Appeal period ended

Request for jurisdiction received

September 23, 1988
October 10, 1988
October 14, 1988

FOR ADOPTION OF FINDINGS ONLY: Public hearing closed.

ITEM B: Appeal No. V88-257. Hearing October 26, 1988. Protesting the granting of
a variance for property at 2522 Octavia Street. Upon motion of Vice President Makras,
the Board voted 5-0 to overrule the department and deny the variance.

I) PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to (3) minutes for each speaker,

ITEMS 3A through 3D shall be heard together.

BARBARA MESKUNAS & P.A.D.S.,
3A) vs. Appellants

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 88-246

[Protesting issuance on
[September 6, 1988, to
[the SF Housing Authority,
[permit to Erect a Structure
[at 1717 Eddy Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8716547S.
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY.

(10/:

BARBARA MESKUNAS & P.A.D.S.,
!B) vs. Appellants

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 88-247

"[Protesting issuance on
[September 6, 1988, to
[the SF Housing Authority,
[permit to Erect a Structure
[at 1150 Scott Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8716554S.
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY.

do/;

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, NOVEMBER 9, 1988 PAGE TWO

ARBARA MESKUNAS & P.A.D.S.,

vs. Appellants
EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
ITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 88-248

[Protesting issuance on
[September 6, 1988, to
[the SF Housing Authority,
[permit to Erect a Structure
[1851 Eddy Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8716557S.
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY.

(10/31)

ARBARA MESKUNAS & P.A.D.S.,

vs. Appellants
EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
ITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 88-249

[Protesting issuance on
[September 6, 1988, to
[the SF Housing Authority,
[permit to Erect a Structure
[1750 Turk Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8716563S.
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY.

(10/31)

APPEAL NO. Y88-239

ONALD J. RICE, Appellant

vs .
ONING ADMINISTRATOR,

Respondent

[Denial on August 26, 1988,
[of Rear Yard & Lot Size
[variance sought for property
[located at 775 Noe Street/
[8 - 10 Rayburn Street.
[VARIANCE CASE NO. 87.511EV
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY.

(10/16)

APPEAL NO. 88-244

LAIRE C. PILCHER, Appellant

vs.
'EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
ITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[September 14, 1988, to
[Roseanna Hughes, permit
[to Erect a Structure at
[4660 25th Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8801529.
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY

(10/29)

AROLYN H. AHO, Appellant

vs.
EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
ITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 88-253

[Protesting issuance on
[September 14, 1988, to
[Roseanna Hughes, permit
[to Erect a Structure at
[4660 25th Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8801529.
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY.

(11/8)

APPEAL NO. 88-263

:ND£RL0IN HOUSING CLINIC, INC.,
vs. Appellants
':PT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
\HI APPROVAL

[pretesting issuance on
[September 29, 1988, to
[Taldan Investment Co.,
[permit to Alter a Building
[at 1405 Van Ness Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8811436.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(11/23)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, NOVEMBER 9, 1988 PAGE THREE

APPEAL NO. 88-262

)LYMPIC AUTO REPAIR, Appellant

vs.
IRE DEPARTMENT, Respondent

"[Denial on September 29, 1988,
[of application for a Garage,
[Public Repair permit at
[690 25th Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 880077.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(11/22)

APPEAL NO. 88-266

HO T. TRUONG, dba BANGKOK

ORIENTAL MASSAGE, Appellants

vs.

'OLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent

[Revocation on October 3, 1988,
[of Massage Establishment permit
[at 738 Larkin Street.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(11/27)

APPEAL NO. 88-258

IILLIAM J. REILLY, Appellant

vs.
)EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent.

[Imposition of penalty
[on October 6, 1988,
[for work done at
[1254-58 Montgomery St.
[APPLICATION NO. 8813663.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(11/15)

APPEAL NO. 88-264

(NDREW PAW, Appellant

vs.
)EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Imposition of penalty
[on October 6, 1988,
[for work done at
[314 Richland Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8809662
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(11/26)

APPEAL NO. 88-268

I0LL0W COW, Appellant

vs.
€PT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

"[Denial on October 4, 1988,
[of permit to Alter a Building
[at 3165 Steiner Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8812593.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(11/28)

APPEAL NO. 88-250

. H. A. R. P. , Appellants

vs.
EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
ITY PLANNING APPROVAL

"[Protesting issuance on
[September 7, 1988, to
[Martin Lai or, permit
[to Erect a Structure at
[1789 9th Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8711839.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(11/1)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, NOVEMBER 9, 1988 PAGE FOUR

APPEAL NO. 88-252

VAN & SUSAN VICAN, Appellants

vs.
>EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
JTY PLANNING APROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[September 14, 1988, to
[B. Natale & G. Braid,
[permit to Alter a Building
[at 4380 26th Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8808070.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(11/7)

APPEAL NO. 88-267

IAMES SMITHSON & MAMORU ARIMOTO,
vs. Appellants
£PT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
JTY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[October 7, 1988, to
[William F. McDonagh, Jr.,
[permit to Demolish a Building
[at 235 - 237 Collins Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8712955.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(11/27)

APPEAL NO. 88-271

NGRID M. APTER, Appellant

vs.
IEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
JTY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[October 7, 1988, to
[William F. McDonagh, Jr.,
[permit to Demolish a Building
[at 235 - 237 Collins Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8712955.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(11/27)

APPEAL NO. V88-265

iLACKSTONE COURT ASSOCIATION,
vs. Appellants
!0NING ADMINISTRATOR,

Respondent

[Protesting issuance on
[October 5, 1988, to
[Jeremy Kotas, of Exposure
[of a Dwelling Unit Variance
[sought for property located
[at 1555 Lombard Street &
[30* Blackstone Court.
[VARIANCE CASE NO. 87.538EAVD
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(11/26)

UBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to (3) minutes for each speaker.

nyTDLKo ur mr_ dummj ur rLKrui arrLML5

ESTHER Y. MARKS PRESIDENT

VICTOR G. MAKRAS VICE PRESIDENT

RALPH D. HOUSE COMMISSIONER

PAUL H. MELBOSTAD COMMISSIONER

BEVERLY J. PRIOR COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: In the case of ap-
peal of denials, revocations and suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken shall
speak first and shall be allowed seven (7) minutes for thier presentation and
three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

In cases of multiple appeals of the same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7) min-
utes to present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal and shall
speak consecutively, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for roal arguments and, for each appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Beard not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing :om,no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
■nt 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(415) 554-6720 San Francisco, California 94102

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

CITY HALL
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102

£W LIBRARIAN- H^/"~~£^
Public Library

>30 ^ CtyuJU, ~$p documents dept.

!\<*l&

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

CAN FRAiNi^.^O

WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 1988 °',R'-'° ' !
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE:

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING:

ITEM A: Letter from Nathaniel S. Peters, requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 88-223.
Hearing September 28, 1988. The appellant had appealed the denial of a permit to
Alter a Building at 1825 Pine Street. Upon motion of President Marks, the Board
voted 5-0 to uphold the Department and deny the permit. This matter continued from
hearing of October 19, 1988, for further consideration at this time.

ITEM B: Letter from Joseph G. Yick, requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 88-261.
Hearing October 26, 1988. Appellant protested the denial of permit to Alter a
Building at 1915 Fillmore Street. Upon motion of Vice President Makras, the Board
voted 3-2 to overrule the Department and grant the permit (Melbostad & Prior dissented).
Four votes needed to overrule, the Department is upheld and the permit denied.

ITEM C: Letter from Alex Kotlyar, permit holder, requesting rehearing of Appeal Nos.
88-237, 88-238 and 88-240." Hearing October 26, 1988. Appellants protested the
issuance of permit to Erect a Structure at 2925A Larkin Street. Upon motion of Vice
President Makras, the Board voted 1-4 (Marks, House, Melbostad and Prior dissented) to
uphold the Department and grant the permit. The Department is overruled and the permit
denied.

REQUEST FOR JURISDICTION BEYOND THE 15-DAY APPEAL PERIOD:

ITEM D: Letter from Richard Connolly, requesting the Board to take jurisdiction over
permit to Alter a Building at 590-36th Avenue. This permit was originally issued on
February 8, 1988, and protested by Mr. Connolly on February 17, 1988. The Board heard
the matter and on March 1, 1988, voted 4-0 (Commissioner Fung was absent) to uphold the
permit. Subsequently City Planning learned that the Fukuda decision applied and that
the permit had been improperly issued without Proposition M findings.

On August 23, 1988, City Planning notified the Bureau that it had made findings of
consistency with Proposition M and requested that the permit be suspended so that a
new 15-day appeal period could run to enable any protestor to file a protest appeal.

Permit suspended and properly posted August 31, 1988

Appeal period ended September 15, 1988

Request for jurisdiction received. October 5, 1988

This matter continued from hearing of October 19, 1988, for further consideration at
this time.

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, NOVEMBER 16, 1988 PAGE TWO

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE: (Continued)

FOR ADOPTION OF FINDINGS ONLY: Public hearing closed.

ITEM E: Appeal No. 88-170. Hearing October 5, 1988. Appellants protested the issuance
of permit to Alter a Building at 2120 Broadway Street. Upon motion of Vice President
Makras, the Board voted 4-1 (Commissioner House dissented) to grant the permit subject
to conditions. This matter continued from October 19, 1988, and October 26, 1988, for
further consideration at this time. The Board will meet in closed session at 4:30 p.m.
on November 16, 1988 in Room 206 of City Hall pursuant to California Government Code
section 54956.9 (b). Based on existing facts and circumstances, the Board has
significant exposure to litigation.

ITEM F: Appeal Nos. 88-237, 88-238 and 88-240. Hearing October 26, 1988.

REQUEST FOR REHEARING:

ITEM G: Letter from Dirk B. Flamer-Caldera, permit holder, requesting rehearing of
Appeal No. V88-257. Appellants protesting the issuance of variance for property at
2522 Octavia Street. Hearing October 26, 1988. Upon motion of Vice President Makras,
the Board voted 5-0 to overrule the Department and deny the variance.

PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to (3) minutes for each speaker.
ITEMS 3A through 3C shall be heard together.

APPEAL NO. 88-259

HIROSHI FUKUDA, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

vs. [May 1, 1987, to Edwin Lum,

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [permit to Erect a Structure

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [at 148 - 18th Avenue.

[APPLICATION NO. 8604857.

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (11/20)

APPEAL NO. 88-116

18TH AVENUE RESIDENTIAL COALITION, [Protesting issuance on

vs. Appellant [May 1, 1987, to Yee Lum,

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [permit to Demolish a Bldg.

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [at 148 - 18th Avenue.

[APPLICATION NO. 8705144.

[REMANDED FROM SUPERIOR COURT. (6/17)

APPEAL NO. 88-117

18TH AVENUE RESIDENTIAL COALITION, [Protesting issuance on

vs. Appellant [May 1, 1987, to Edwin Lum,

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [permit to Erect a Structure

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [at 148 - 18th Avenue.

[APPLICATION NO. 8604857.

[REMANDED FROM SUPERIOR COURT. (6/17)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, NOVEMBER 16, 1988 PAGE THREE

DEBRA SHARABI, Appellant

vs.
POLICE DEPT., Respondent

APPEAL NO. 88-129

[Denial on May 6, 1988,
[of Pushcart Peddler permit
[at the southeast corner of
[Geary & Mason Streets.
[FOR REHEARING TODAY.

(6/20)

CLARENCE WISE & IVAN STEVENS,
vs. Appellants
POLICE DEPARTMENT,

Respondent

APPEAL NO. 88-275

"[Denial on October 13, 1988,
[of Dance Hall Keeper/Place
[of Entertainment permit at
[at 5251 Third Street.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(12/7)

THOMAS VALTIN, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

APPEAL NO. 88-272

[Imposition of penalty
[on October 21, 1988,
[for work done without a
[permit at 309 Prospect Ave,
[APPLICATION NO. 8804453.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(11/30)

ITEMS 7A and 7B shall be heard together.

EILEEN L. F. LEUNG,

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS,

Appellant
Respondent

EILEEN L. F. LEUNG, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

APPEAL NO. 88-230

"[Denial on August 17, 1988,

[of permit to Demolish a

[Building at 798-26th Ave.

[APPLICATION NO. 8805084.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (10/10)

APPEAL NO. 88-231

"[Denial on August 17, 1988,

[of permit to Erect a

[Structure at 798-26th Ave.

[APPLICATION NO. 8709574

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (10/10)

JOHN & JULIE HUGHES,

vs. Appellants
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 88-224

[Protesting issuance on
[August 15, 1988, to
[Barry & Vicky Potthoff,
[permit to Alter a Building
[at 2340 Cecilia Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8717614.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(10/3)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, NOVEMBER 16, 1988 PAGE FOUR

APPEAL NO. 88-269

MICHAEL BOSS, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[October 5, 1988, to
[Jack Klein, permit to
[Demolish a Building, at
[235 Whitney Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8811151
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(11/29)

APPEAL NO. 88-270

JOEL A. VENTRESCA, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[October 12, 1988, to
[California Academy of
[Sciences, permit to
[Alter a Building at
[Golden Gate Park.
[APPLICATION NO. 8810410
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(11/29)

APPEAL NO. 88-274

LIAMA & VILIS GRINFELDS,

vs. Appellants
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[October 21, 1988, to
[Dennis Duca & David Mani,
[permit to Alter a Building
[at 3922 - 22nd Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8807298.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(12/4)

APPEAL NO. V88-265

BLACKSTONE COURT ASSOCIATION,
vs. Appellants
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR,

Respondent

[Protesting issuance on
[October 5, 1988, to
[Jeremy Kotas, of Exposure
[of a Dwelling Unit Variance
[sought for property located
[at 1555 Lombard Street &
[30^ Blackstone Court.
[VARIANCE CASE NO. 87.538EA_VD,
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(11/26)

PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to (3) minutes for each speaker.

MBbKb Ur IHL KUAK1J Uh KLKH1 1 APPLALS

ESTHER Y. MARKS PRESIDENT

VICTOR G. MAKRAS VICE PRESIDENT

RALPH D. HOUSE COMMISSIONER

PAUL H. MELBOSTAD COMMISSIONER

BEVERLY J. PRIOR COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: In the case of ap-
peal of denials, revocations and suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken shall
speak first and shall be allowed seven (7) minutes for thier presentation and
three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

In cases of multiple appeals of the same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7) min-
utes to present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal and shall
speak consecutively, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for roal arguments and, for each appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in. the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(415) 554-6720 San Francisco, California 94102

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEAL*

CITY HALL
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102

e-r

Public Library

2 U. ^SP

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS ""^Qy^s losa"
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 1988 ^ h„„,^,^0
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE:

FOR ADOPTION OF FINDINGS ONLY: Public hearing closed.

ITEM A: Appeal Nos. 88-237, 88-238 and 88-240. Hearing October 26, 1988. Appellants
protested the issuance of permit to Erect a Structure at 2925A Larkin Street. Upon
motion of Vice President Makras, the Board voted 1-4 (Marks, House, Melbostad and Prior
dissented) to uphold the Department and grant the permit. The Department is overruled
and the permit denied.

ITEM B: Appeals Nos. 88-246, 88-247, 88-248, and 88-249, Yerba Buena Plaza West
Housing Project. Hearing November 9, 1988. Appellants protested the issuance of
permits to Erect Structures at 1717 Eddy Street, 1150 Scott Street, 1851 Eddy Street,
and 1750 Turk Street. Upon motion of Commissioner Melbostad, the Board voted 5-0 to
grant the permit subject to conditions.

ITEM C: Appeal No. 88-184. Hearing October 19, 1988. Appellant protested the denial
of Outcall Massage Service permit. Upon motion of Commissioner House, the Board voted
5-0 to overrule the department and grant the permit subject to conditions.

ITEM D: Appeal No. 88-270. Hearing November 16, 1988. Appellants protested the
issuance to the California Academy of Sciences permit to Alter a Building at Golden
Gate Park. Upon motion of Vice President Makras, the Board voted 5-0 to uphold the
Department and grant the permit.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING:

ITEM E: Letter from Alex Kotlyar, permit holder, requesting rehearing of Appeal Nos.
88-237, 88-228 and 88-240. Hearing October 26, 1988. Appellants protested the
issuance of permit to Erect a Structure at 2925A Larkin Street. Upon motion of Vice
President Makras, the Board voted 1-4 (Marks, House, Melbostad and Prior dissented) to
uphold the Department and grant the permit. The Department is overruled and the permit
denied. This matter continued from November 16, 1988, for consideration at this
hearing.

ITEM F: Letter from Joseph A. Medina, Fire Marshal , requesting rehearing of Appeal
No. 88-262. Hearing on November 9, 1988. The appellant had appealed the denial by
the San Francisco Fire Department of a Garage, Public Repair permit at 690 25th Avenue.
Upon motion of Vice President House, the Board voted 4-1 (President Marks dissented) to
overrule the department and grant the permit subject to conditions.

ITEM 6: Letter from William J. Reilly requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 88-258.
Hearing November 9, 1988. Appellant protested the Imposition of Penalty for work done
at 1254-58 Montgomery Street. Upon motion of Commissioner House, the Board voted 5-0
to uphold the department's order.

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, NOVEMBER 30, 1988 PAGE TWO

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE: (Continued)
REQUEST FOR JURISDICTION BEYOND THE 15-DAY APPEAL PERIOD:

ITEM H: Letter from Richard Connolly, requesting the Board to take jurisdiction over
permit to Alter a Building at 590-36th Avenue. This permit was originally issued on
February 8, 1988, and protested by Mr. Connolly on February 17, 1988. The Board heard
the matter and on March 1, 1988, voted 4-0 (Commissioner Fung was absent) to uphold the
permit. Subsequently City Planning learned that the Fukuda decision applied and that
the permit had been improperly issued without Proposition M findings.

Permit suspended and properly posted

Appeal period ended

Request for jurisdiction received.

August 31, 1988
September 15, 1988
October 5, 1988

This matter continued from hearing of November 16, 1988, for further consideration at
this time.

PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to (3) minutes for each speaker.

THO T. TRU0N6, dba BANGKOK

ORIENTAL MASSAGE, Appellants

vs.

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent

APPEAL NO. 88-266

[Revocation on October 3, 1988,

[of Massage Establishment permit

[at 738 Larkin Street.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/27)

Items 4A and 4B shall be heard together

EILEEN L. F. LEUNG, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

APPEAL NO. 88-230

'[Denial on August 17, 1988,
[of permit to Demolish a
[Building at 798-26th Ave.
[APPLICATION NO. 8705084.
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY.

(10/10)

EILEEN L. F. LEUNG, Appellant

vs.
)EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

APPEAL NO. 88-231

"[Denial on August 17, 1988,
[of permit to Erect a
[Structure at 798-26th Ave.
[APPLICATION NO. 8709574.
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY.

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, NOVEMBER 30, 1988 PAGE THREE

APPEAL NO. 88-280

KARIN ADAMS, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Imposition of penalty
[on November 4, 1988,
[for work done without a
[permit at 1 Ulloa Street,
[APPLICATION NO. 8814793,
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(12/14)

APPEAL NO. 88-225

EDWARD J. MULLINS,

vs.
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR,

Appellant
Respondent

[Determination by the
[Zoning Administrator
[dated August 4, 1988,
[that the Rear Yard
[Requirement for a
[Proposed Dwelling at
[3855 20th Street is
[45% of lot depth.
[Lot 3857-59 used for
[measurement.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(9/25)

APPEAL NO. 88-241

MARGARET A. VERGES, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[July 18, 1988, of
[permit to Alter a Building
[at 2190 O'Farrell St., the
[Kaiser Parking Structure.
[APPLICATION NO. 8806779.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(10/19)

APPEAL NO. 88-277

MELANIE PILASKI, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

"[Protesting issuance on
[April 19, 1988, to
[John L. Artal , permit
[to Erect a Structure at
[2136 22nd Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8709493.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(12/10)

APPEAL NO. 88-278

GENE STEFANI, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

"[Protesting issuance on
[October 14, 1988, to
[Barbara Lane, permit
[to Alter a Building
[at 1940 Stockton St., #103.
[APPLICATION NO. 8811302.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(12/10)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, NOVEMBER 30, 1988 PAGE FOUR

APPEAL NO. 88-281

MARIJON FRYAR, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

vs. [October 24, 1988, to

OEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [J. Giraudo, permit to

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Alter a Building at

[2211 Castro Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8811660.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/17)

APPEAL NO. 88-282

VERA BURNS, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

vs. [October 28, 1988, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [George & Marjorie McNabb,

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [permit to Alter a Building

[at 32 Forest Side Avenue.

[APPLICATION NO. 8804893.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/19)

Conflict of Interest Code. Adoption of Model Code and Disclosure Category as
recommended by City Attorney and Clerk of Board of Supervisors.

Proposed Additions to Rules of the Board involving Section 2 of Article V - Procedure.

The additions would specify what appellants shall submit including the names and
addresses of property owners of properties adjacent to the subject property, and also
that appeals be filed in the board office by 4:00 p.m. in order to allow adequate time
for staff to prepare a receipt for the fee, to review the submittals, and to provide
informational material to the appellant; except that an appeal shall be accepted at
the Board office up to 5:00 p.m. if it is the final day of the appeal period.

PUBLIC COMIENT: Presentation shall be limited to (3) minutes for each speaker,

nLHDLKo Ur IHL BUAKLJ Ut KLKni I ArTtALb

ESTHER Y. MARKS
VICTOR G. MAKRAS
RALPH D. HOUSE
PAUL H. MELBOSTAD
BEVERLY J. PRIOR

PRESIDENT

VICE PRESIDENT

COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: In the case of ap-
peal of denials, revocations and suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken shall
speak first and shall be allowed seven (7) minutes for thier presentation and
three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

In cases of multiple appeals of the same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7) min-
utes to present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal and shall
speak consecutively, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for roal arguments and, for each appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

Robert H. Feldman
Executive Director
(415) 554-6720

City and County of San Francisco

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Room 154-A, City Hall

San Francisco, California 94102

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

CITY HALL
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102

C1TV LIBRARIAN
Public Library

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS documents
WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 7, 1988 DEC6 ]988

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL SSfit EKSSSZR

L~AGeni>&]

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE:

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING:

ITEM A: Letter from Thomas Mannion, Esq., on behalf of William F. McDonagh, Jr.,
requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 88-267. Hearing November 9, 1988. Appellants
protested the issuance of demolition permit for building at 235 - 237 Collins Street.
Upon motion of Commissioner Prior, the Board voted 5-0 to overrule the Department and
deny the permit.

ITEM B: Letter from Thomas Mannion, Esq., on behalf of William F. McDonagh, Jr.,
requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 88-271. Hearing November 9, 1988. Appellants
protested the issuance of demolition permit for building at 235 - 237 Collins Street.
Upon motion of Commissioner Prior, the Board voted 5-0 to overrule the Department and
deny the permit.

ITEM C: Letter from Sue Hestor requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 88-170. Hearing
October 5, 1988. Appellant protested the issuance of permit to alter a building at
2120 Broadway Street (Hamlin School). Upon motion of Vice President Makras, the
Board voted 4-1 (Commissioner Melbostad dissented) to uphold the department and grant
the permit subject to conditions.

FOR ADOPTION OF FINDINGS ONLY: Public hearing closed.

ITEM D: Appeal No. 88-263. Hearing November 9, 1988. Appellants protested the
issuance of permit to alter a building at 1405 Van Ness Avenue. Upon motion of
Commissioner House, the Board voted 4-0 to grant the permit subject to conditions.

ITEM E: Appeals No. 88-246, 88-247, 88-248, and 88-249, Yerba Buena Plaza West
Housing Project. Hearing November 9, 1988. Appellants protested the issuance of
permits to Erect Structures at 1717 Eddy Street, 1150 Scott Street, 1851 Eddy Street,
and 1750 Turk Street. Upon Motion of Commissi'oner Melbostad, the Board voted 5-0 to
grant the permit subject to conditions. This matter continued from hearing of November
30, 1988, for further consideration at this time.

Public Connent: Presentation shall be limited to (3) minutes for each speaker.

APPEAL NO. 88-284

RANULF0 Y. LIM, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

vs. [October 27, 1988, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Nick Tsiplako, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Alter a Building at

[3325 - 23rd Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8805990.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/19)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, DECEMBER 7, 1988 PAGE TWO

APPEAL NO. 88-261

ROBERT YICK COMPANY, INC.,

vs. Appellant
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL

[Denial on October 4, 1988,
[of permit to Alter a Building
[at 1915 Fillmore Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8807195.
[FOR REHEARING TODAY.

(11/12)

APPEAL NO. 88-255

BING W. CHOY, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL

[Denial on September 16, 1988,
[of permit to Alter a Building
[at 277 7th Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8615315.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(11/9)

APPEAL NO. 88-283

LEANA GIANNINI, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL

[Denial on November 11, 1988,
[of permit to Alter a Building
[at 122-126 Cervantes Boulevard
[APPLICATION NO. 8714115.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(12/19)

Items 7A and 7B shall be heard together.

APPEAL NO. 88-286

JAMES AND MARIE T. TRACY,

vs. Appellants
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[October 26, 1988, to
[Donna Garolla, permit to
[Alter a Building at
[2320-2322 Broadway Street,
[APPLICATION NO. 8810678.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(12/20)

APPEAL NO. 88-287

NORMAN C. AND NORAH STONE,

vs. Appellants
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[October 26, 1988, to
[Donna Garolla, permit to
[Alter a Building at
[2320-2322 Broadway Street,
[APPLICATION NO. 8810678.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(12/20)

APPEAL NO. 88-288

MARION AIRD, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[October 28, 1988, to

[Ottorino E. Pasian,

[permit to Demolish a

[Building at 338 Brazil Ave,

[APPLICATION NO. 8814912.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(12/14)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, DECEMBER 7, 1988 PAGE THREE

APPEAL WO. 88-290

LEN GANDUGLIA, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

vs. [October 31, 1988, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Aliabadi Nassar, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Alter a Building at

[2978 - 16th Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8808675.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/25)

APPEAL NO. V88-289

LOUIS J. GIORGI, Appellant [Denial on November 7, 1988,

vs. [of Rear Yard & Open Space

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [Variances sought for property

[located at 401-409 Naples St.

[VARIANCE CASE NO. 88.310EV.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/23)

APPEAL NO. V88-285

DOUGLAS R. SCHMIDT, Appellant [Protesting condition of

vs. [Variance granted on

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [November 3, 1988, for

[property located at

[781 - 27th Street.

[VARIANCE CASE NO. 88.298V.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/10)

Public comment: Presentation shall be limited to (3) minutes for each speaker.

MEMBERS 01- IHb BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

ESTHER Y. MARKS PRESIDENT

VICTOR 6. MAKRAS VICE PRESIDENT

RALPH D. HOUSE COMMISSIONER

PAUL H. MELBOSTAD COMMISSIONER

BEVERLY J. PRIOR COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: In the case of ap-
peal of denials, revocations and suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken shall
speak first and shall be allowed seven (7) minutes for thier presentation and
three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

In cases of multiple appeals of the same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7) min-
utes to present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal and shall
speak consecutively, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for roal arguments and, for each appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(415) 554-6720 San Francisco, California 94102

C!TY HALL
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102

-CITY LIBRA-RXM_
Public Library

14/8S

Ctt( t-*-^ -<SP DOCUMENTS PERT.

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF- PERMIT APPEALS [ : ■■"

WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 14, 1988
^r ~-

4:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL

SAN FRANOISCQ

MUSI IO (.IH^fAPV

Begin at 4:00 p.m. - Informational Presentation (one hour) by the Department of City
Planning on new Neighborhood Conservation Controls.

REGULAR HEARING TO BEGIN AT 5:00 P.M.

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE:

PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker,

MARIA GALETTI, Appellant

vs.
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent

APPEAL NO. 88-297

[Protesting issuance on
[November 8, 1988, to
[Vincent Hogan, permit for
[Place of Entertainment
[at 1300 Church Street,
[dba, "The Bailey".
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(1/1/89)

MARTIN BURSCHEK, Appellant

vs.
SAN FRANCISCO ARTS COMMISSION,

Respondent

APPEAL NO. 88-301

[Suspension on November 9, 1988,

[of Street Artist permit

[for various locations.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/1/89)

Items 6A and 6B shall be heard together.

APPEAL NO. 88-2

ROBERT HUCKABY.et al , Appellant

vs.
DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Protesting issuance on

[November ' 7, 1988, to

[Guaranteed Electric Co.,.

[an Electrical Permit for

[work at 1405 Van Ness Avenue.

[APPLICATION/PERiMIT NO. E051661.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/1/89)

ROBERT HUCKABY, et al , Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

APPEAL NO. 38-300

"[Protesting issuance on
[November ' 8, 1988, to
[Chen's Plumbing Contractor,
[a Plumbing Permit for work
[at 1405 Van Ness Avenue.
[APPLICATION/PERMIT NO. P252203.
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/1)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, DECEMBER V\, 1988 PAGE TWO

Appeals No. 88-305, 88-306 & 88-307 shall be heard together.

APPEALS NO. 88-305, 88-306 & 88-307

BARBARA MESKUNAS, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuances on
[November 9, 1988, to
[S.F. Housing Authority,
[permits to Demolish (3)
[Buildings at 1150 Scott,
[1145 Scott & 1125 Pierce.
[APPLICATION NOS. 8811251,
[8811252 & 8811250.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(1/2/89)

APPEAL NO. 88-296

HELEN WU, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Denial on November 4, 1988,
[of permit to Alter a Building
[at 5429 Anza Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8806651.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(12/28)

APPEAL NO. 88-298

MANN WONG, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL
DAHI DISAPPROVAL

"[Denial on November 22, 1988,
[of permit to Alter a Building
[at 858 Washington Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8800170.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(1/1/89)

APPEAL NO. 88-302

STEPHEN GAITHER, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[November 7, 1988, to
[Doris Morphew, permit
[to Alter a Building
[at 4465 - 17th Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8712335,
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(1/1/89)

PUBLIC CC#*4ENT: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker.

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

ESTHER Y. MARKS PRESIDENT

VICTOR G. MAKRAS VICE PRESIDENT

RALPH D. HOUSE COMMISSIONER

PAUL H. MELBOSTAD COMMISSIONER

BEVERLY J. PRIOR COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: In the case of ap-
peal of denials, revocations and suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken shall
speak first and shall be allowed seven (7) minutes for thier presentation and
three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

In cases of multiple appeals of the same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7) min-
utes to present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal and shall
speak consecutively, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for roal arguments and, for each appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(415) 554-6720 San Francisco, California 94102

eA11, CITY
,S£!!tRANCISCp, CA 94102

J-Ca^

£ITY LIBRARIAN.
Public Library

U. ~r^C

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS documents dept.
WEDNESDAY^ JANUARY 25, 1989 JAN 2 4 1989

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL S^uc^SSSSS'

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE:

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING:

ITEM A: Letter from Thomas Steel, Esq., on behalf of appellant, Tho Thi Truong,
requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 88-266. Hearing November 30, 1988. The appellant
had appealed the revocation of a massage establishment permit at 738 Larkin Street.
On November 30, 1988, upon motion of Commissioner Prior, the Board voted 3 - 2 to
uphold the department (President Marks and Commissioner Melbostad dissented). Four
(4) votes needed to overrule, the Department is upheld and the permit revoked.

ITEM B: Letter from John Cracas requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 88-311. Hearing
January 4, 1989. The appellant, John Cracas, had appealed the San Francisco Arts
Commission's suspension of his Street Artist permit for various locations. On
January 4, 1989, upon motion of Commissioner Prior, the Board voted 3 - 1 to overrule
the department (President Marks dissented). Four (4) votes needed to overrule, the
Commission's order for suspension is upheld. Vice President Makras was absent.

PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to (3) three minutes for each speaker.

APPEAL NO. 88-325

ANTHONY SAAB, dba "AL BABY'S INC." [Denial on November 30,

Appellant [1988, of Cabaret permit

vs. [at 330 Ritch Street,

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent % [dba, "AL BABY'S INC."

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/23)

APPEAL NO. 88-276

JOSEPH B0NIN0, Appellant [Denial on November 4,

vs. [1988, of permit to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Alter a Building at

CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL [224 Sea Cliff Avenue.

[APPLICATION NO. 8805662.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/12)

IEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, JANUARY 25, 1989 PAGE TWO

Items 5A and 5B shall be heard together.

APPEAL NO. 88-322

JONATHAN PARKER, Appellant [Denial on December 7,

vs. [1988, of permit to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Alter a Building at

[608 Taraval Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8810950.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/18)

APPEAL NO. 88-323

JONATHAN PARKER, Appellant [Denial on December 7,

vs. [1988, of permit to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Alter a Building at

[711 Taraval Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8810952.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/18)

APPEAL NO. 88-326

ROBERT WALKER, Appellant [Denial on December 14,

vs. [1988, of permit to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Alter a Building at

CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL [2294 - 29th Avenue.

[APPLICATION NO. 8713568.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/24)

APPEAL NO. 88-327

SAMUEL KWONG, Appellant [Denial on December 16,

vs. [1988, of permit to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Alter a Building at

DAHI DISAPPROVAL [1350 Stockton Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8813860.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/28)

APPEAL NO. 88-328

WRY BOSCACCI, Appellant [Denial on December 20,

vs. [1988, of permit to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Alter a 3-Unit Building

[at 1520-1522 Lombard St.

[without sprinklering

[the entire building.

[APPLICATION NO. 8809473.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/29)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, JANUARY 25, 1989 PAGE THREE

APPEAL NO. 88-329

TENDERLOIN HOUSING CLINIC, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[December 7, 1988, to
[Gary Raugh Enterprises,
[permit to Alter a Building
[at 1499 California Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8817009.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(1/31)

APPEAL NO. V88-324

MARVIN ISRAEL, Appellant

vs.
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent

[Protesting Condition of
[Variance granted on
[December 6, 1988, for
[property located at
[455 Hoffman Avenue.
[VARIANCE CASE NO. 88.542V
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(1/15)

PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to (3) three minutes for each speaker,

ntni5LK5 Ul- IHt BUAK1J Ut~ KLKH1 1 AKKLAL5

ESTHER Y. MARKS PRESIDENT

VICTOR 6. MAKRAS VICE PRESIDENT

RALPH D. HOUSE COMMISSIONER

PAUL H. MELBOSTAD COMMISSIONER

BEVERLY J. PRIOR COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: In the case of ap-
peal of denials, revocations and suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken shall
speak first and shall be allowed seven (7) minutes for thier presentation and
three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

In cases of multiple appeals of the same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7) min-
utes to present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal and shall
speak consecutively, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for roal arguments and, for each appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(415) 554-6720 San Francisco, California 94102

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Room 154-A City Hall

San Francisco, CA 94102

Public Library

DOCUMENTS DEPT

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS . 6 1sgg

/81 „(ht*JL**

WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 1989

BLIC ( IBRAPV

H: 00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL

tegin at 4:00 p.m. - Presentation by staff of Bureau of Building Inspection on
)ermit processing, plan checking and Building Code procedures.

REGULAR CALENDAR SHALL BEGIN AT 5:00 P.M.

1ATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE:

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING:

ITEM A: Letter from Harry O'Brien, Esq., on behalf of Sol Friedman, requesting
shearing of Appeal No. 88-292. Hearing January 18, 1989. The appellant, Mr.
:riedman, had protested the denial of permit to alter a building at 145 Laurel Street.
Jpon motion of Commissioner House, the Board voted 2 - 3 to uphold the department and
jrant the permit. (Commissioner Melbostad, Vice President Makras & Commissioner Prior
Jissented.) Four votes needed to overrule the department, the order is upheld and
the permit denied.

ITEM B: Letter from Robert W. Passmore, Zoning Administrator, requesting rehearing of
\ppeal No. V88-324. Hearing January 25, 1989. The appellant, Marvin Israel, had
Drotested the conditions attached to the granting of a variance for property at 455
Hoffman Avenue. Upon motion of Commissioner House, the Board voted 5 - 0 to overrule
the Zoning Administrator and delete the conditions attached to the granting of the
variance.

ITEM C: Letter from Jack Wholey, Esq., on behalf of Edward J. Mull ins, requesting
shearing of Appeal No. 88-225. Hearing January 18, 1989. The appellant, Mr. Mullins,
lad protested dwelling at 3855 - 20th Street is 45% of lot depth. Upon motion of Vice
Resident Makras, the Board voted 3-2 to overrule the Zoning Administrator's
ietermination (President Marks & Commissioner Melbostad dissented). Four votes needed
:o overrule the order, the determination is upheld.

OR ADOPTION OF FINDINGS ONLY: Public hearing closed.

TEM D: Appeal No. 88-303. Hearing January 18, 1989. The appellant, Ba Thi Goldberg,
ba "Nikki's Massage", protested the suspension of her massage establishment permit at
172 Sutter Street. Upon motion of Vice President Makras, the Board voted 4-1
Commissioner Melbostad dissented) to uphold the department's order.

TEM E: Appeals No. 88-334 and 88-335. Hearing January 18, 1989. The appellants,
ouglas Lipton and Cynthia Daniel, protested the revocation of alteration permits for
ark done at 41 Nevada Street. Upon motion of Commissioner Prior, the Board voted 5-0
3 overrule the department and reinstate the permit.

IEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, FEBRUARY 8, 1989 PAGE TWO

REQUESTS FOR JURISDICTION BEYOND THE 15-DAY APPEAL PERIOD:

ITEM F: Letter from Ian McLean, Legislative Coordinator, NTEU Chapter 212, requesting
the Board to take jurisdiction over decisions of Bureau of Building Inspection that
were made which Mr. McLean believes led to final sign-offs on various inspections that
were done relating to the design or construction of a building under construction at
75 Hawthorne Street.

ITEM G: Letter from Diane Sidd - Champion requesting the Board to take jurisdiction
over Building permit issued for construction of a structure at 78 Chenery Street.

Permit suspended and properly posted November 18, 1988
Appeal period ended December 5, 1988

Request for jurisdiction received February 1, 1989

ITEM H: Letter from Harvey E. Goldfine, Esq., on behalf of Mrs. Bernarda Torres,
requesting that the Board take jurisdiction over a building permit issued for the
construction of a building at 310 Lexington Street.

Permit suspended and properly posted October 13, 1988
Appeal period ended October 28, 1988

Request for jurisdiction received February 1, 1989

PUBLIC COMMENT: Comments shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker.

APPEAL NO. 88-311

JOHN CRACAS, Appellant [Suspension of one (1) week

vs. [on November 9, 1988, of

ARTS COMMISSION, Respondent [Street Artist permit for

[various locations.

[(November 23-29, 1988).

[FOR REHEARING TODAY. > (1/7)

APPEAL NO. 88-336

JOHN REICHERT, dba "Paradise Lounge" [Denial on November 22,

Appellant [1988, of Cabaret permit

vs. [at 1501 Folsom Street.

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent [FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/1)

APPEAL NO. 89-009
AL BABY'S INC., Appellant [Denial on January 18,

vs. [1989, of permit to

DEPT. CITY PLANNING, Respondent [Alter a Building at

[330 Ritch Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8819722.
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/27)

APPEAL NO. 89-003

ROBERT S. SHIMMON, Appellant [Imposition of Penalty

vs. [on January 9, 1989,

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [for work done at

[12 Woodland Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 88160704.
•[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/18)

IEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, FEBRUARY 8, 1989 PAGE THREE

APPEAL NO- 88-333

AN6EL0 PANARI, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Imposition of Penalty
[on December 21, 1988,
[for work done at
[3106 Gough Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8813205,
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(1/31)

Items 9A, 9B and 9C shall be heard together.

APPEAL NO. 88-293

CHINATOWN NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT
RESOURCE CENTER, etal , Appellants

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[November 2, 1988, to
[Mardikian Enterprises,
[permit to Erect a
[Structure at 8 Wetmore St.
[APPLICATION NO. 8707412S.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(12/27)

APPEAL NO. 88-294

CHINATOWN NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT
RESOURCE CENTER, etal, Appellants
vs .
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[November 2, 1988, to
[Mardikian Enterprises,
[permit to Erect a
[Structure at 959 Powell St.
[APPLICATION NO. 8804433S.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(12/27)

APPEAL NO. 88-295

CHINATOWN NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT
RESOURCE CENTER, etal, Appellants

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[November 2, 1988, to
[Mardikian Enterprises,
[permit to Erect a
[Structure at 959 Powell St,
[APPLICATION NO. 8707411S.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(12/27)

APPEAL NO. 88-337

FRANK FREDERICKS, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[December 13, 1988, to
[Terry & Joyce Byers,
[permit to Alter a
[Building at 173 Lower
[Terrace Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8716479,
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(1/12)

/ICTORIA FONG & GEE KIN CHOU,

Appellants
vs.
)EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
:iTY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 88-338

[Protesting issuance on
^December 15, 1988, to
[Don & Sue Larramendy,
[permit to Alter a
[Building at 1570-16th Ave,
[APPLICATION NO. 8815300.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(2/8)

1EETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, FEBRUARY 8, 1989 PAGE FOUR

Items 12A and 12B shall be heard together.

APPEAL NO. 88-339

CYRUS FRANK, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

vs. [December 16, 1988, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Abraham L. Yang, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Demolish a Building

[at 3240 Sacramento St.

[APPLICATION NO. 8807836.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/8)

APPEAL NO. 88-340

CYRUS FRANK, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

vs. [December 16, 1988, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Abraham L. Yang, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Erect a Structure

[at 3240 Sacramento St.

[APPLICATION NO. 8807835.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/8)

APPEAL NO. 89-002

JOHN J. MCARDLE, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

vs. [December 21, 1988, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Arthur & Dorraine Zief,

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [permit to Alter a

[Building at 2010

[Pacific Avenue.

[APPLICATION NO. 8816122.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/14)

APPEAL NO. V88-332

DOUGLAS P. MORGAN, Appellant [Denial on December 12,

vs. [1988, of Off-Street

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [Parking & Exposure

[of Dwelling Unit
[Variances for property
[at 331 Cherry Street.
[VARIANCE CASE NO. 87.676V.
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (1/30)

APPEAL NO. 89-001

PETER TAI, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

vs. [December 30, 1988, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Chin-Teh Shin, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Alter a Building at

[18 Presidio Terrace St.

[APPLICATION NO. 8715597.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (2/14)

'UBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker.

ntrittbKb Ui- IHL BUAK1J UF KLKHl I AKKLAL5

ESTHER Y. MARKS PRESIDENT

VICTOR 6. MAKRAS VICE PRESIDENT

RALPH D. HOUSE COMMISSIONER

PAUL H. MELBOSTAD COMMISSIONER

BEVERLY J. PRIOR COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: In the case of ap-
peal of denials, revocations and suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken shall
speak first and shall be allowed seven (7) minutes for thier presentation and
three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

In cases of multiple appeals of the same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7) min-
utes to present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal and shall
speak consecutively, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for roal arguments and, for each appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

Each member present at a meeting . shall vote for or against the matter before
them unless a commissioner is excused from voting by a motion adopted by a
majority of the members present. (Amended April 20, 1988)

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(415) 554-6720 San Francisco, California 94102

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Room 154-A City Halt

San Francisco, CA 94102

Public Library

C^ujU.

DOCUMENTS DEPT.

50 ?

I , MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS ^EB 1 4 1989

WEDNESDAY" FEBRUARY 15, 1989 SGStJgffiSSR

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE:

FOR ADOPTION OF FINDINGS ONLY: Public hearing closed.

ITEM A: Appeal No. V88-265. Hearing December 7, 1988. Appellant had protested the
issuance of Exposure of a Dwelling Unit Variance sought for property located at 1555
.ombard Street and 30^ Blackstone Court. Upon motion of President Marks, the Board
Yoted 4-1 (Vice President Makras dissenting) to overrule the Department and deny
the variance.

ITEM B: Appeal No. 88-325. Hearing January 25, 1989. Appellant had appealed the
denial of a cabaret permit for his restaurant at 330 Ritch Street. Upon motion of
/ice President Makras, the Board voted 5 - 0 to overrule the Police Department and to
grant the permit.

ITEM C: Appeal No. 89-009. Hearing February 8, 1989. Appellant had appealed the
denial of an alteration permit for a dance floor in a restaurant and to waive
Conditions two and three of Planning Commission Motion No. 11533. Upon motion of
l/ice President Makras, the Board voted 5 - 0 to overrule City Planning and to delete
Conditions two and three and to grant the permit with the remaining Planning
Commission conditions of the motion. Restaurant at 330 Ritch Street.

ITEM D: Appeal No. V88-332. Hearing February 8, 1989. Appellant appealed the
denial of a variance to legalize a third unit at 331 Cherry Street. Upon motion of
Commissioner Melbostad, the Board voted 5 - 0 to overrule the Zoning Administrator
rith conditions.

REQUEST FOR REHEARING:

[TEM E: Letter from Dennis A. Lee, Esq., requesting on behalf of Mr. & Mrs. Joseph
Jonino rehearing of Appeal No. 88-276. Hearing February 25, 1989. Upon motion of
Commissioner House, the Board voted 3 - 2 to overrule the Department (President Marks
ind Commissioner Melbostad dissented) and grant the permit. Four (4) votes needed to
)verrule the Department, the permit is denied.

REQUEST FOR JURISDICTION BEYOND THE 15-DAY APPEAL PERIOD:

TEM F: Letter from Diane Sidd - Champion requesting the Board to take jurisdiction
>ver Building permit issued for construction of a structure at 78 Chenery Street.

Permit suspended and properly posted November 18, 1988
Appeal period ended December 5, 1988

Request for jurisdiction received February 1, 1989

EETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, FEBRUARY 15, 1989 PAGE TWO

Public Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker.

APPEAL NO. 88-170

ROLF LEWIS & MARTIN AUSTIN, [Protesting issuance on

Appellants [June 9, 1988, to the

vs. [Hamlin School, permit

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [to Alter a Building at

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [2120 Broadway Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8804913.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/3)

APPEAL NO. 88-311

JOHN CRACAS, Appellant [Suspension of one (1) week

vs. [on November 9, 1988, of

ARTS COMMISSION, Respondent [Street Artist permit for

[various locations.

[(November 23-29, 1988).

[FOR REHEARING TODAY. (1/7)

APPEAL NO. V88-289

LOUIS J. GIORGI, Appellant [Denial on November 7,

vs. [1988, of Rear Yard &

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [Open Space Variances

[sought for property

[located at 401 - 409

[Naples Street.

[VARIANCE CASE NO. 88.310EV.

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (1/23)

APPEAL NO. 89-010

CARLOS PEREZ, Appellant [Appealing for refund

vs. [of penalty imposed

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent * [on January 27, 1989,

[for work done at

[51 Linda Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8900302.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/8)

APPEAL NO. 89-011

JEAN V. CLAES, Appellant [Appealing for refund

vs. [of penalty imposed

)EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [on January 30, 1989,

[for work done at

[542 Alvarado Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8900753.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/11)

IEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, FEBRUARY 15, 1989 PAGE THREE

ROGER WONG C. DIP, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 89-006

[Protesting issuance on
[January 6, 1988, to
[Julie Lee, permit to
[Alter a Building at
[1325 - 9th Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8803489
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(2/26)

NEIGHBORS OF THE EXCELSIOR,

vs. Appellant
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 89-008

[Protesting issuance on
[January 9, 1989, to
[Rich Dixon, permit to
[Erect a Structure at
[251 Peru Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8716831
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(3/4)

Consideration of department budget for Fiscal Year 1989 - 1990

Proposed changes to rules and regulations of Residential Rent Stabilization and
Arbitration Board. Discussion of public hearing January 31, 1989 held by Rent Board.

Workshop on plan reading.

'ublic Comment: Each speaker shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker.

MLMBLKS Oh IHb BUAKU Or PtKMIl APPEALS

ESTHER Y. MARKS PRESIDENT

VICTOR G. MAKRAS VICE PRESIDENT

RALPH D. HOUSE COMMISSIONER

PAUL H. MELBOSTAD COMMISSIONER

BEVERLY J. PRIOR COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: In the case of ap-
peal of denials, revocations and suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken shall
speak first and shall be allowed seven (7) minutes for thier presentation and
three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

In cases of multiple appeals of the same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7) min-
utes to present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal and shall
speak consecutively, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for roal arguments and, for each appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(415) 554-6720 San Francisco, California 94102

BOARD OF PERMJTAPPWIS
Room 154-A City Ha"

San Francisco, CA 94102

PublA Library

-*- ft DP . /i A^ C

|Q DOCUMENTS DEPT.

? MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS FEB 2 8 1989

l/gq WEDNESDAY/ MARCH 1, 1989 san franc.sco

' 'JUBLIC LIBRARV

4:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL

1:00 P.M. - Presentation by Department of City Planning on the proposed South of Market
Controls. For informational purposes only. No action will be taken by the Board.

REGULAR CALENDAR SHALL BEGIN AT 5:00 P.M.

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE:

FOR ADOPTION OF FINDINGS ONLY: Public hearing closed.

[TEM A: Appeal No. V88-265. Hearing December 7, 1988. Appellant had protested the
issuance of an Exposure of a Dwelling Unit Variance sought for property at 1555 Lombard
Street and 30H Blackstone Court. Upon motion of President Marks, the Board voted 4-1
[Vice President Makras dissented) to overrule the Zoning Administrator and deny the
/ariance.

ITEM B: Appeals No. 88-339 and 88-340. Hearing February 8, 1989. Appellant had

Drotested both a demolition permit and a new construction permit to clear the property

it 3240 Sacramento Street and to build a mixed-use building on the site. Upon motion of

Commissioner Prior, the Board voted 3-2 to uphold both permits. President Marks and
Commissioner House dissented.

REQUEST FOR REHEARING:

ITEM C: Appeals No. 88-339 and 88-340. Letter dated February 21, 1989 from Mr. Cyrus
I. Frank requesting that the Board grant a rehearing of the two (2) appeals for the
demolition and new construction proposed for 3240 Sacramento Street.

REQUEST FOR JURISDICTION BEYOND THE 15-DAY APPEAL PERIOD:

ITEM D: Letter from Ken O'Brien requesting that the Board take jurisdiction over

)uilding permit Application No. 8807356 for property at 340 Capp Street.

Permit reissued and posted after Prop M January 31, 1989
Findings made.

Appeal period ended February 15, 1989

Request for jurisdiction received February 23, 1989

UBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker.

terns 4A, 4B and 4C shall be heard together.

APPEAL NO. 88-293

HINATOWN NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT [Protesting issuance on

ESOURCE CENTER, et al , Appellants [November 2, 1988, to

vs. [Mardikian Enterprises,

EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [permit to Erect a

ITY PLANNING APPROVAL t Structure at 8 Wetmore St.

[APPLICATION NO. 8707412S.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/27)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, MARCH 1, 1989 PAGE TWO

Items 4A, 4B and 4C shall be heard together,

APPEAL NO. 88-294

CHINATOWN NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT
RESOURCE CENTER, et al , Appellants

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[November 2, 1988, to
[Mardikian Enterprises,
[permit to Erect a
[Structure at 959 Powell St.
[APPLICATION NO. 8804433S.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(12/27)

APPEAL NO. 88-295

CHINATOWN NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT
RESOURCE CENTER, et al , Appellants

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[November 2, 1988, to
[Mardikian Enterprises,
[permit to Erect a
[Structure at 959 Powell St,
[APPLICATION NO. 8707411S.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(12/27)

APPEAL NO. 89-015

EDWARD C. WANG, Appellant

vs.
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL

[Denial on January 20,
[1989, of Place of
[Entertainment permit
[at 3600 - 16th Street.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(3/15)

APPEAL NO. 89-004

CORINNE FENDELL, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Appealing for Refund
[of Penalty Imposed
[on January 12, 1989,
[for work done at
[728 Hampshire Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8900308,
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(2/21)

ED CATAGNETTO, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

APPEAL NO. 88-014

[Imposition of Penalty
[on February 1, 1989,
[for work done at
[1616 Golden Gate Ave.
[APPLICATION NO. 8901752
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(3/13)

APPEAL NO. 89-012

STANDISH DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION,

Appellant
vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

"[Denial on January 25,
[1989, of permit to
[Alter a Building at
[4017-19 18th Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8900267
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(3/6)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, MARCH L 1989 PAGE THREE

APPEAL NO. 89-018

AIDA Z. GRAYBEAL, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Denial on January 31,
[1989, of permit to
[Alter a Building at
[279 Downey Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8817753,
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(3/12)

APPEAL NO. 89-013

ROSE MARIE GOULD, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Re-issuance on February
[1, 1989, to Cencaland
[Property Investment Inc.,
[permit to Demolish a
[Building at 212 Flood Ave.
[APPLICATION NO. 8894330.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(3/13)

Items 11A and 11B shall be heard together.

APPEAL NO. 88-250

S. H. A. R. P. , Appellants
) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[September 7, 1988, to
[Martin Lalor, permit
[to Erect a Structure \
[at 1789/91 - 9th Ave.
[APPLICATION NO. 8711839.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(11/1)

APPEAL NO. 89-026

DANITA SORENSON, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[January 30, 1989, to
[Martin Lalor, permit
[to Demolish a Building
[at 1789/91 - 9th Ave.
[APPLICATION NO. 8808833,
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(3/20)

PETER TAI, Appellant

vs .
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 89-001

[Protesting issuance on
[December 30, 1988, to
[Chin-Teh Shin, permit
[to Alter a Building at
[18 Presidio Terrace St.
[APPLICATION NO. 8715597
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(2/14)

5 PUBLIC COMMENT: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker.

ESTHER Y. MARKS PRESIDENT

VICTOR 6. MAKRAS VICE PRESIDENT

RALPH D. HOUSE COMMISSIONER

PAUL H. MELBOSTAD COMMISSIONER

BEVERLY J. PRIOR COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: In the case of ap-
peal of denials, revocations and suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken shall
speak first and shall be allowed seven (7) minutes for thier presentation and
three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

In cases of multiple appeals of the same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7) min-
utes to present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal and shall
speak consecutively, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for roal arguments and, for each appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(415) 554-6720 San Francisco, California 94102

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Room 154-A City Hall

San Francisco, CA941UZ

CITY UMARIAN
PuW-fc Library

£>

ac_

50 ^ u ^

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS D0CUMents dept.
WEDNESDAY. MARCH 8, 1989 MAR6 m9

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL at* i-rancisoo

i-omUC UKUAPV

1ATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE:

:0R ADOPTION OF FINDINGS ONLY: Public hearing closed.

ITEM A: Appeal No. V88-265. Hearing December 7, 1988. Appellant had protested the
issuance of an Exposure of a Dwelling Unit Variance sought for property at 1555 Lombard
>treet and 30^ Blackstone Court. Upon motion of President Marks, the Board voted 4-1
Vice President Makras dissented) to overrule the Zoning Administrator and deny the
variance.

REQUEST FOR REHEARING:

[TEM B: Appeal No. V88-289. Letter dated February 24, 1989 from Mr. Wayne Rieke on
>ehalf of Mr. Louis J. Giorgi, appellant, requesting rehearing. Hearing February 15,
[989. Upon motion of Vice President Makras to uphold the denial of the variance, the
loard voted 2-2 (Commissioners Melbostad and Prior in dissent and for approval of the
variance; Commissioner House absent). Four votes being needed to overrule, the denial
ras upheld.

*ublic Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker.

[terns 3A and 3B shall be heard together.

APPEAL NO. 88-339

'YRUS FRANK, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

vs. [December 16, 1988, to

)EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Abraham L. Yang, permit

:iTY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Demolish a Building

[at 3240 Sacramento St.

[APPLICATION NO. 8807836.

[FOR REHEARING TODAY. (2/8)

APPEAL NO. 88-340

YRUS FRANK, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

vs. [December 16, 1988, to

EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Abraham L. Yang, permit

ITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Erect a Structure

[at 3240 Sacramento St.

[APPLICATION NO. 8807835.

[FOR REHEARING TODAY. (2/8)

APPEAL NO. Y88-324

ARVIN ISRAEL, Appellant

vs.
ONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent

Protesting Condition of
Variance granted on
December 6, 1988, for
[property located at
455 Hoffman Avenue.
VARIANCE CASE NO. 88.542V.
FOR REHEARING TODAY. (1/15)

FETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, MARCH 8, 1989 PAGE TWO

APPEAL NO. 88-311

JOHN CRACAS, Appellant

vs.
\RTS COMMISSION, Respondent

[Suspension of one (1)
[week on November 9,
[1988, of Street Artist
[permit for various
[locations. (November
[23 - 29, 1988).
[FOR REHEARING TODAY.

(1/7)

APPEAL NO. 89-020

1ARIAN DAGGETT, Appellant

vs.
)EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Imposition of Penalty
[on February 8, 1989,
[for work done at
[1006 Dolores Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8819675
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(3/20)

[terns 7A and 7B shall be heard together.

APPEAL NO. 89-021

MISSION HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP.,

vs. Appellant
)EPT. PUBLIC WORKS,

Respondent

[Imposition of Penalty
[on February 10, 1989,
[for work done at
[1227 Hampshire Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8814005,
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(3/22)

MISSION HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP,

vs. Appellant
)EPT. PUBLIC WORKS,

Respondent

APPEAL NO. 89-022

[Imposition of Penalty
[on February 10, 1989,
[for work done at
[1227 Hampshire Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8815153.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(3/22)

JAMES U GATTENf, Appellant

)EPT. PUBLIC WpRKS, Respondent
:iTY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 88-219

PLANNING iblS

[Deni

el on August

16,

[1988

', of pe>

T*it

[Alii

\r a Built

rfng

[1975

- 8th /

[venue.

[APPLICATION |

10.

8808193

[FOR

HEARING 1

r0DAY.

(9/25)

APPEAL NO. 89-023

iILL YEUNG, Appellant

vs.
'EPT. CITY PLANNING, Respondent

[Denial on February 2,
[1989, of Health
[Permit Referral for
[a Storage Warehouse
[at 2783 Folsom St.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(3/22)

EETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, MARCH 8, 1989 PAGE THREE

APPEAL NO. 89-016

UCHARD L. LAMBERT & W.P. GARNER,

Appellant
vs.
)EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
:iTY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL

[Denial on February 3,
[1989, of permit to
[Alter a Building at
[2844A Bush Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8807811
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(3/15)

APPEAL NO. 89-025

EARL JOE, Appellant
vs.
PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
PLANNING APPROVAL

)EPT

:ity

[Protesting issuance on
[January 30, 1989, to
[James Bowes, permit to
[Demolish a Building at
[1334 Vallejo Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8819373
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(3/26)

APPEAL NO. 89-027

5T. FRANCIS HOMES ASSOCIATION,

Appellant
vs.
)EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
:iTY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance
[on January 30, 1989,
[to Stephen 0. Johns
[permit to Alter a
[Building at 1600
[Monterey Boulevard.
[APPLICATION NO. 8819942
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(3/26)

APPEAL NO. V89-024

JICCOLO & FLORA OLTRANTI, Appellants

vs .
'.ONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent

[Denial on February 1,
[1989, of Rear Yard
[Variance sought for
[property located at
[2908 Octavia Street.
[VARIANCE CASE NO. 88.304V.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(3/22)

APPEAL NO. 89-030

iAN FRANCISCO ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE,

Appellant
vs.
)EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
:iTY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[January 30, 1989, to
[Roosevelt & Althedi
[Carrie, permit to
[Demolish a Building
[at 2075 Sutter Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8816707
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(3/27)

ITER TAI, Appellant

vs .
:PT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
ITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 89-001

[Protesting issuance on
[December 30, 198#, to
[Chin-Teh Shin, permit
[to Alter a Building at
[18 Presidio Terrace.
[APPLICATION NO. 8715597
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(2/14)

iblic Cotraent: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker.

HLnbLKb W- IHL bUAKU Uh PtKMI I ArTLALS

ESTHER Y. MARKS PRESIDENT

VICTOR 6. MAKRAS VICE PRESIDENT

RALPH D. HOUSE COMMISSIONER

PAUL H. MELBOSTAD COMMISSIONER

BEVERLY J. PRIOR COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: In the case of ap-
peal of denials, revocations and suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken shall
speak first and shall be allowed seven (7) minutes for thier presentation and
three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

In cases of multiple appeals of the same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7) min-
utes to present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal and shall
speak consecutively, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for roal arguments and, for each appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room.no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARIN6

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(415) 554-6720 San Francisco, California 94102

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Room 154-A City Hall

San Francisco, CA 94102

CITY LIBRARIAN
Public Library

8°l

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

WEDNESDAY, MARCH 29, 1989

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL

RECEIVED

MAR 2 1 1989
USRAAIAN'S OFFICE

1ATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE:

IEPORT BY DEPARTMENTS:

TEM A: Appeal No. 88-176. Report by departments of compliance with conditions
if Board's approval of Building Permit Application No. 8706937 for an addition at
>23 - 22nd Avenue. On August 10, 1988, upon motion of Commissioner House, the
loard voted 4-0 (Commissioner Prior absent) to uphold the department^and grant
;he permit subject to conditions. DOCUMENT " "PT.

OR ADOPTION OF FINDINGS ONLY: Public hearing closed

MAR 2 4 1989
PUBLIC UBflAftY

[TEM B: Appeal No. 88-293, 88-294, and 88-295. Hearing on February 8, 1989,
ind final vote on March 1, 1989. The Chinatown Neighborhood Improvement Resource
lenter, etal , the appellant, had protested the issuance of building permits to
jrect a structure at 8 Wetmore Street, and two structures at 959 Powell Street.
Jpon motion of President Marks, the Board voted 4 - 0 to overrule the department
md deny the permits. (Commissioner Prior was excused from voting on this issue).

hiblic Comment: Presentation shall be limited to (3) three minutes for each speaker,

APPEAL NO. V88-324

1ARVIN ISRAEL, Appellant

vs.
'.0NING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent

[Protesting Condition of
[Variance granted on
[December 6, 1988, for
[property located at
[455 Hoffman Avenue.
[VARIANCE CASE NO. 88.542V.
[FOR FURTHER REHEARING TODAY.

(1/15)

[terns 4A and 4B shall be heard together.

APPEAL NO. 88-250

>. H. A. R. P. , Appellants

vs .
)EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
'.ITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[September 7, 1988, to
[Martin Lai or, permit
[to Erect a Structure
[at 1789/91 - 9th Ave.
[APPLICATION NO. 8711839.
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY,

(11/1)

APPEAL NO. 89-026

ANITA SORENSON, Appellant

vs.
EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
ITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[January 30, 1989, to
[Martin Lalor, permit
[to Demolish a Building
[at 1789/91 - 9th Ave.
[APPLICATION NO. 8808833.
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY,

(3/20)

EETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, MARCH 29, 1989 PAGE TWO

APPEAL NO. 89-038

JIZAR LAMA, Appellant [Protesting condition of

vs. [issuance on February 8,

)EPT. CITY PLANNING, Respondent [1989, of Type 21 License

[at 1865 Laguna Street,
[that hours of operation
[are limited to between
[6:00 a.m. & 10:00 p.m.
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/1)

APPEAL NO. 89-039

1ARGARET MOUNTIN, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

vs. [February 15, 1989, to

)EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Dick Mak, permit to

;ITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Alter a Building at

[18 Radio Terrace.

[APPLICATION NO. 8803971.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/11)

[terns 7A and 7B shall be heard together.

APPEAL NO. 89-040

IATI0NAL TREASURY EMPLOYEE'S UNION [Protesting issuance on

:HAPTER 212, Appellant [February 17, 1989,

vs. [to Hawthorne Plaza

)EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Limited, permit to

:ITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Alter a Building at

[75 Hawthorne Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8819946.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/15)

APPEAL NO. 89-046

JATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEE'S UNION [Protesting issuance on

:HAPTER 212, Appellant [February 17, 1989, to

vs. [Arcon Limited, permit

)EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [to Alter a Building at

:iTY PLANNING APPROVAL [75 Hawthorne Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8819952.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/19)

APPEAL NO. V8S-035

RICHARD SANDER, Appellant [Denial on February 16,

vs. [1989, of Rear Yard,

'.ONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [Usable Open Space &

[Minimum Lot Size
[Variances sought at
[1120 - 24 Clay Street/
[21-23 Truett Street.
[VARIANCE CASE NO. 88.682EV.
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/28)

Uiblic Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker.

SPECIAL MEETING

APPEAL NO. V88-324

IARVIN ISRAEL, Appellant [Protesting Condition of

vs. [Variance granted on

ONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [December 6, 1988, for

[property located at
[455 Hoffman Avenue.
[VARIANCE CASE NO. 88.542V.
fSITE INPSECTION WEDNESDAY,
[MARCH 29, 1989, AT 8:30 A.M.

ESTHER Y. MARKS PRESIDENT

VICTOR 6. MAKRAS VICE PRESIDENT

RALPH D. HOUSE COMMISSIONER

PAUL H. MELBOSTAD COMMISSIONER

BEVERLY J. PRIOR COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: In the case of ap-
peal of denials, revocations and suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken shall
speak first and shall be allowed seven (7) minutes for thier presentation and
three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

In cases of multiple appeals of the same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7) min-
utes to present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal and shall
speak consecutively, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for roal arguments and, for each appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(415) 554-6720 San Francisco, California 94102

Nviyvnaii Alio

Z0Tfr6 VO 'oosioupj

S"IV3ddV

^ ^:^P

^ MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS documents dept.

6/M

WEDNESDAY, APRIL 5, 1989 APR 3 1989

~^^ SAN FKANCltaCO

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL *-«*mc ubrar*

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE:

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING:

ITEM A: Letter from Christopher C. Hall, Esq., on behalf of Tormui Ty, requesting
rehearing of Appeal No. 89-031. Hearing March 15, 1989. Appellant protested

the denial of masseuse permit at 450 - B Jones Street. Upon motion of Vice

President Makras, the Board voted 5-0 to uphold the department and deny the
permit.

ITEM B: Letter from Weyman I . Lundquist, Esq. , requesting rehearing of Appeal No.
89-028. Hearing March 15, 1989. Appellant protested the issuance of permit to
alter a building at 3733 Broderick Street. Upon motion of Commissioner Prior,
the Board voted 3-2 to uphold the department and grant the permit. (President
Marks and Commissioner Melbostad dissented.)

ITEM C: Letter from Ramona Albright requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 89-037.
Hearing March 15, 1989. Appellant had appealed the issuance of permit to erect a
structure at 201 Raccoon Drive. Upon motion of Vice President Makras, the Board
voted 5-0 to uphold the department and grant the permit subject to conditions.

FOR ADOPTION OF FINDINGS ONLY: Public hearing closed.

ITEM D: Appeals No. 88-293, 88-294, and 88-295. Hearing on February 8, 1989,
and final vote on March 1, 1989. The Chinatown Neighborhood Improvement Resource
Center, etal , the appellant, had protested the issuance of building permits to
erect a structure at 8 Wetmore Street, and two structures at 959 Powell Street.
Upon motion of President Marks, the Board voted 4 - 0 to overrule the department
and deny the permits. (Commissioner Prior was excused from voting on this issue).

ITEM E: Appeal No. V88-324. Rehearing on March 15, 1989. Site inspection and
decision on March 29, 1989. The appellant, Marvin Israel, had protested the
imposition of a condition in the granting of a variance to legalize a second
dwelling unit at 455 Hoffman Street. Upon motion of Commissioner Melbostad, the
Board voted 5-0 to overrule the department and delete the condition to create a
second tandem parking space behind the existing single space in the garage with
a new condition that the appellant record a Notice of Special Restrictions
restricting use of the subject building to two units only.

Public Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker.

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, APRIL 5, 1989 PAGE THREE

APPEAL NO. 89-033

DAVID J. MARX, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[February 6, 1989, to
[John Hirohata, permit
[to Alter a Building at
[53 Christopher Drive.
[APPLICATION NO. 8817711.
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY,

(3/29)

APPEAL NO. 89-044

ALEX S. CASSIMUS, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Appealing for refund of
[penalty imposed on
[March 9, 1989, for work
[done at 975 Church St.
[APPLICATION NO. 8802521.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(4/18)

APPEAL NO. 89-047

HONG KONG MARKET, INC., Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Denial on March 13,
[1989, of permit to
[Alter a Building at
[1134 Grant Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8902333.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(4/25)

STEPHEN RYAN, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 89-042

[Protesting issuance on
[February 28, 1989, to
[Oliver Wen, permit to
[Demolish a Building at
[1843 - 10th Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8815473.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(4/18)

APPEAL NO. 89-045

L & J DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION CO.,

vs. Appellant
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[February 23, 1989, to
[Sung Wi , permit to
[Alter a Building at
[270-272 - 22nd Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8817586,
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(4/18)

Public Coonent: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker.

1EETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, APRIL 5, 1989 PAGE TWO

Items 3A through 3D shall be heard together.

APPEAL NO. 89-048

MARC E. MINARDI & BRUCE DAVIES,
vs. Appellants
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[March 6, 1989, to
[Lynn Susoeff, permit
[to Alter a Building at
[2 Southern Heights Ave.
[APPLICATION NO. 8806841
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(4/29)

APPEAL NO. 89-049

MARC E. MINARDI & BRUCE DAVIES,
vs. Appellants
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[March 6, 1989, to
[Lynn Susoeff, permit
[to Alter a Building at
[4 Southern Heights Ave.
[APPLICATION NO. 8806840
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(4/29)

APPEAL NO. 89-050

MARC E. MINARDI & BRUCE DAVIES,
vs. Appellants
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[March 6, 1989, to
[Lynn Susoeff, permit
[to Alter a Building at
[6 Southern Heights Ave.
[APPLICATION NO. 8806842
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(4/29)

MARC E. MINARDI & BRUCE DAVIES,
vs. Appellants
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 89-051

[Protesting issuance on
[March 6, 1989, to
[Lynn Susoeff, permit
[to Alter a Building at
[8 Southern Heights Ave.
[APPLICATION NO. 8806843,
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(4/29)

APPEAL NO. 89-043

INVERNESS HOTEL TENANTS ASSOCIATION,

vs. Appellant
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[February 22, 1989,
[to Taldan Investment
[Company, permit to
[Alter a Building at
[1405 Van Ness Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8818880,
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(4/18)

rn-riDLixo vr mL dwwij ur ri_i\ni i ftrrnftLO

ESTHER Y. MARKS PRESIDENT

VICTOR 6. MAKRAS VICE PRESIDENT

RALPH D. HOUSE COMMISSIONER

PAUL H. MELBOSTAD COMMISSIONER

BEVERLY J. PRIOR COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: In the case of ap-
peal of denials, revocations and suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken shall
speak first and shall be allowed seven (7) minutes for thier presentation and
three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

In cases of multiple appeals of the same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7) min-
utes to present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal and shall
speak consecutively, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for roal arguments and, for each appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS FOR RBPRIN6

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(415) 554-6720 San Francisco, California 94102

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Room 154-A City Hall

San Francisco, CA 94102

Anj

SAN
Public Library

DOCUMENTS DEPT.

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS APR 3 4 738$

WEDNESDAY, APRIL 26, 1989
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL

P"«UC I.IRRAPv

1ATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE:

ty and County of San Francisco

Board of Permit Appeals

ADDENDUM TO CALENDAR
MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS
WEDNESDAY^ APRIL 26, 1989
5:00 P.M., R000M 282, CITY HALL

DOCUMENTS DErT.

APR2 4W89

SAN rKHWWI^

(1) 4 : 00 P.M. Presentation by Commissioner Prior on the technique of reading
and interpreting building plans.

Date this notice posted: April 20, 1989

IS) 558-4421

Room 154- A. City Half

San Francisco 94102

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

WEDNESDAY, APRIL 26, 1989

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL

DOCUMENTS D£pr.

APR ;; 41989

1ATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE:

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING:

TEM A: Letter from Robert J. McCarthy, Esq., on behalf of Markdikian Enterprises,
•equesting rehearing of Appeals Nos. 88-293, 88-294, and 88-295. Appeals heard together
in February 8, 1989 and March 1, 1989. Findings adopted on April 5, 1989. Appellants,
;he Chinatown Neighborhood Improvement Resource Center, et al , had protested the issuance
if permits to erect structures at 959 Powell Street and 8 Wetmore Street. Upon motion of
'resident Marks, the Board voted 4-0 to overrule the department and deny the permit.
Commissioner Prior was excused from voting on this issue).

JEM B: Letter from David Owen, Rick Spector, and Ian McLean on behalf of the National
reasury Employee's Union, Chapter 212, requesting rehearing of Appeals Nos. 89-040 and
19-046. These appeals were heard together on March 29, 1989. The appellants had
irotested the issuances on February 17, 1989 and March 1, 1989 permits to alter a
wilding at 75 Hawthorne Street. Upon motion of Vice President Makras, the Board voted
» - 0 to uphold the department and grant the permits.

•ublic Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker,

APPEAL NO. 89-047

I0NG KONG MARKET, INC

vs.
)EPT. PUBLIC WORKS,

. , Appellant
Respondent

[Denial on March 13,
[1989, of permit to
[Alter a Building at
[1134 Grant Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8902333.
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY,

(4/25)

terns 4A through 4D shall be heard together.

IARC E. MINARDI & BRUCE DAVIES,
vs. Appellants
•EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
ITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 89-04S

[Protesting issuance on
[March 6, 1989, to
[Lynn Susoeff, permit
[to Alter a Building at
T2 Southern Heights Ave.
[APPLICATION NO. 8806841
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(4/29)

ARC E. MINARDI & BRUCE DAVIES,
vs. Appellants
EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
ITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 89-049

"[Protesting issuance on
[March 6, 1989, to
[Lynn Susoeff, permit
[to Alter a Building at
[4 Southern Heights Ave.
[APPLICATION NO. 8806840
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(4/29)

EETIN6 OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, APRIL 26, 1989 PAGE TWO

[terns 4A through 4D shall be heard together.

APPEAL NO. 89-050

IARC E. MINARDI & BRUCE DAVIES, [Protesting issuance on

vs. Appellants [March 6, 1989, to

IEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Lynn Susoeff, permit

IITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Alter a Building at

[6 Southern Heights Ave.

[APPLICATION NO. 8806842.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/29)

APPEAL NO. 89-051

IARC E. MINARDI & BRUCE DAVIES, [Protesting issuance on I

vs. Appellants [March 6, 1989, to

IEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Lynn Susoeff, permit

:iTY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Alter a Building at

[8 Southern Heights Ave.

[APPLICATION NO. 8806843.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/29)

APPEAL NO. 89-044

iLEX S. CASSIMUS, Appellant [Appealing for Refund

vs. [of Penalty imposed

IEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [on March 9, 1989,

[for work done at

[975 Church Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8802521.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/18)

APPEAL NO. 89-052

STERLING ROOFING COMPANY, Appellant [Appealing for Refund

vs. [of Penalty imposed

)EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [on March 20, 1989,

[for work done at

[1059 Clement Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8904348.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/29)

APPEAL NO. 89-054

10 ON LOUIE, Appellant [Appealing for Refund

vs. [of Penalty imposed

IEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [on March 22, 1989,

[for work done at

[574-580 Haight Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8904082.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/3)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, APRIL 26, 1989 PAGE THREE

APPEAL NO. 89-056

IKC CONSTRUCTION & ROOFING, [Imposition of Penalty

vs. Appellant [on March 27, 1989,

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, [for work done at

Respondent [1979 - 43rd Avenue.

[APPLICATION NO. 8904800.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/6)

APPEAL NO. 89-057

THOMAS R. FOX, Appellant [Appealing for Refund

vs. [of Penalty imposed

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [on March 28, 1989,

[for work done at

[401 Montecito Avenue.

[APPLICATION NO. 8904358.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/8)

APPEAL NO. 89-059

WILLIAM BROWN, Appellant [Appealing for Refund

vs. [of Penalty imposed

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [on March 29, 1989,

[for work done at

[440 Laurel Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8904206.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/10)

:asa

)EPT

APPEAL

NO.

89-

-053

E LA RAZA, INC., Appellant

[Denial of Alteration

vs.

[permit by Bureau of

PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Building Inspection
[on March 14, 1989,
[to change occupancy
[classification from
[R-3 to E-3 to allow
[a child care facility
[at 90 Bartlett Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8816173
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(5/2)

APPEAL NO. V89-041

•ROOK & SHAWN BYERS, Appellant [Protesting Condition of

vs. [of Variance granted on

ONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [February 24, 1989, 'or

[property located at

[3636 Washington Street.

[VARIANCE CASE NO. 88.300V.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (4/15)

1EETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, APRIL 26, 1989 PAGE FOUR

APPEAL NO. 89-068

CHARLES & DIANE FRANKEL, Appellants [Protesting issuance on

vs. [March 20, 1989, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Randy George, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Alter a Building

[at 361 Lombard Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8808752.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/15)

Items 15A and 15B shall be heard together.

APPEAL NO. 89-075

GEORGE BISAILLON, Appellant [Protesting issuance

vs. [on March 31, 1989,

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [to Kotas Pantaleoni

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Architects, permit to

[Demolish a Building

[at 2559 Diamond Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8812330.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/9)

APPEAL NO. 89-058

3E0RGE BISAILLON, Appellant [Protesting issuance

vs. [on March 31, 1989,

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [to Kotas Pantaleoni

:iTY PLANNING APPROVAL [Architects, permit to

[Erect a Structure

[at 2559 Diamond Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8812333.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/23)

'ublic Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker

MbKittiKS Uh IHb ttOAKl) Ur PtkMll APPEALS

ESTHER Y. MARKS PRESIDENT

VICTOR 6. MAKRAS VICE PRESIDENT

RALPH D. HOUSE COMMISSIONER

PAUL H. MELBOSTAD COMMISSIONER

BEVERLY J. PRIOR COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: In the case of ap-
peal of denials, revocations and suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken shall
speak first and shall be allowed seven (7) minutes for thier presentation and
three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

In cases of multiple appeals of the same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7) min-
utes to present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal and shall
speak consecutively, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for roal arguments and, for each appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL HOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS FOR REHEAR 1X6

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(415) 554-6720 San Francisco, California 94102

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Room 154-ACr$[ Hall
San Francisco, CA 94102

Public Library

£\ --i DOCUMENTS DEPT.

2. MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS MAY 1 0 1989

io/sq . WEDNESDAY, MAY 10, 1989 SSS.^S^Sl

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE.

Public Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker.

APPEAL NO. 89-060

:AR0L ELVIN, Appellant [Imposition of Penalty

vs. [on March 23, 1989,

)EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [for work done at

[302-308 - 26th Avenue.

[APPLICATION NO. 8903213.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/2)

APPEAL NO. 89-063

>0V MICHAELI, Appellant [Imposition of Penalty

vs. [on March 31, 1989,

•EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [for work done at

[555 Vermont Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8903348.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/3)

APPEAL NO. 89-064

LFRED DUMLAO, Appellant [Imposition of Penalty

vs. [on April 3, 1989,

EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [for work done at

[543 Jersey Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8904077.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/6)

APPEAL NO. 89-070

DAM SPARKS, Appellant [Denial on March 31, 1989,

vs. [of permit to convert 69

EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [rooms from residential

AHI DISAPPROVAL [use to tourist use at

[520 Jones Street.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/17)

APPEAL NO. 89-071

t W. ALARCON, etal, Appellants" [Protesting issuance on

vs. [March 29, 1989, to Ruff

. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Construction, Electrical

[Permit for I40C Washington
'"Street, Apartments 9. 11,
[12, 14, 16, and 17.
[PERMIT NO. 57761.
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/21)

IEETIN6 OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, MAY 10, 1989 PAGE TWO

APPEAL NO. 89-072

EARL B. EWING, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Denial on April 7,
[1989, of permit to
[Alter a Building at
[2253 California Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8902992
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(5/21)

APPEAL NO. 89-061

SARRY F. BRAID, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
:iTY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[March 27, 1989, to Ivan
[and Sue Vican, permit
[to Alter a Building at
[4376 - 26th Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8807802,
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(5/2)

IUKA TAKEMURA & SAM CHA CHOI,

vs. Appellants
EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
ITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 89-062

[Protesting issuance
[on March 17, 1989,
[to Leonid & Larisa
[Modorsky, permit to
[Alter a Building at
[2438 Taraval Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8815929
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(5/3)

APPEAL NO. 89-065

ICKOLAS A. DIAMAN, Appellant

vs.

EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
ITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[March 31, 1989, to
[Larry Wasserman, permit
[to Alter a Building at
[2960 Van Ness Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8904220,
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(5/6)

APPEAL NO. 89-067

IRNARDO & KATHLEEN URQUIETA,
Appellants
vs.
:PT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
:TY PLANNING APPROVAL

"[Protesting issuance on
[March 20, 1989, to
[John Schrader, permit
[to Alter a Building
[at 135 Beaver Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8902649
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(5/15)

liblic Couinent: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker.

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

ESTHER Y. MARKS PRESIDENT

VICTOR 6. MAKRAS VICE PRESIDENT

RALPH D. HOUSE COMMISSIONER

PAUL H. MELBOSTAD COMMISSIONER

BEVERLY J. PRIOR COMMISSIONER

. DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: In the case of ap-
peal of denials, revocations and suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken shall
speak first and shall be allowed seven (7) minutes for thier presentation and
three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

In cases of multiple appeals of the same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7) min-
utes to present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal and shall
speak consecutively, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for roal arguments and, for each appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regGTar business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS F..R REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 ■'"or complete rule on rehearings.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Room 154-AC'rty HaH
San Francisco, CA 94102

Oc,

CITY LIBRARIAN
Public Library

'"""Or"'

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

n DOCUMENTS DE^T,

2- WEDNESDAY, MAY 17, 1989

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL

SAN FRANwiowO

PUJBUC UWKARY

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE:

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING:

ITEM A: Letter from Randall M. Shaw dated May 5, 1989, on behalf of the Inverness
Hotel Tenants Association requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 89-043. Hearing April
5, 1989. Appellants protested the issuance of permit to alter a building at 1405
Van Ness Avenue. Upon motion of Commissioner Melbostad, the Board voted 4 - 0 to
uphold the Department and grant the permit subject to conditions. Commissioner
Prior did not vote. Notice of Decision and Order with final language of conditions
released on April 26, 1989.

ITEM B: Letter from Marc E. Minardi and Bruce Davies, requesting rehearing of
\ppeals Nos. 89-048, 89-049, 89-050, and 89-051. Hearing April 26, 1989. The
appellants had protested the issuance of permits to construct a building at 2, 4,
5, and 8 Southern Heights Avenue. Upon motion of Commissioner Prior, the Board
•oted 4-1 (President Marks dissented) to grant the permit subject to conditions.

REQUEST FOR JURISDICTION:

[TEM C: Letter from Ronald M. Abend, Esq., on behalf of the Marina at Pier 39 Slip
)wners Association requesting that the Board take jurisdiction over the Zoning
Administrator's decision to accept the Pier 39 Aquarium Conditional Use Application.

Public Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker.

APPEAL NO. 89-074

IARK C. JEWETT, Appellant [Appealing for Refund

vs. [of Penalty imposed

lEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent . [on April 11, 1989,

[for work done at

[124 Del Mar Avenue.

[APPLICATION NO. 8905931.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/23)

APPEAL NO. 89-079

0SEPH KELLY, JR., Appellant [Appealing for Refund

vs. [of Penalty Imposed

EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [on April 27, 1989,

[for work done at

[862 Guerrero Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8906238.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/6)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, MAY 17, 1989 PAGE TWO

APPEAL NO. 89-077

GEORGE HELLERICH, Appellant [Appeal of Condition

|(5) vs. [Imposed on April 18,

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [1989, to Mina-Tree Signs,

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Inc., permit to Erect a

[Sign at 3150 California St.

[APPLICATION NO. 8904097.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/

APPEAL NO. 89-017

GUNTHER GOPP, Appellant [Order to Cease Violation

[6) vs. [of the Planning Code,

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [dated January 20, 1989,

[for property located at
[473 Ellis Street.
[FOR HEARING TODAY. {3/1

APPEAL NO. 89-073

ANDREAS VON FOERSTER, Appellant [Determination by the

7) vs. [Zoning Administrator

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [on March 28, 1989,

[that the proposal
[does not conform to
[Planning Code Section
[132 (b) & Residential
[Design Guidelines at
[128 Montcalm Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8902465.
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/3

APPEAL NO. 89-076

JAWJ GREENWALD, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

8) vs. [March 31, 1989, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Howard Cooper & George

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [E. Shelton, permit to

[Alter a Building at

[970 Chestnut Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8814707.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/

APPEAL NO. 89-081

JOSEPH FARR, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

9) vs. [April 19, 1989, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Sam Budousky, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Erect a Structure

[at 302 Warren Drive.

[APPLICATION NO. 8808286.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/1

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, MAY 17, 1989 PAGE THREE

APPEAL NO. V89-078

POLLY O'CONNOR,
vs.
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR,

Appellant

Respondent

[Protesting issuance on
[April 13, 1989, to
[Lucia Bogatay, Minimum
[Lot Size, Rear Yard,
[Exposure of a Dwelling
[Unit, Usable Open Space
[& Ground Story Frontage
[Variances sought for
[property located at
[25-29 Pleasant Street/
[1224 Sacramento Street.
[VARIANCE CASE NO. 88.431EV,
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(5/31)

Public Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three minutes for each speaker.

SPECIAL MEETING

APPEAL NO. 89-068

CHARLES & DIANE FRANKEL, Appellants

vs.
)EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[March 20, 1989, to
[Randy George, permit
[to Alter a Building
[at 361 Lombard Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8808752.
[SITE INSPECTION WEDNESDAY,
[MAY 22, 1989, AT 8:30 A.M.

[(Continued for further hearing
[ to May 31, 1989.)

ntrusLKb m- ihl buaku ur- mtmi ArrtALb

ESTHER Y. MARKS PRESIDENT

VICTOR 6. MAKRAS VICE PRESIDENT

RALPH D. HOUSE COMMISSIONER

PAUL H. MELBOSTAD COMMISSIONER

BEVERLY J. PRIOR COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: In the case of ap-
peal of denials, revocations and suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken shall
speak first and shall be allowed seven (7) minutes for thier presentation and
three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

In the case of protest appeals, the protestor shall speak first end shall be
allowed seven (7) minutes to present oral argument and three (3) minutes for
rebuttal, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes to present
oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal. The Board may request a
departmental response at its own discretion.

In cases of multiple appeals of the same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7) min-
utes to present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal and shall
speak consecutively, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for roal arguments and, for each appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room.no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(415) 554-6720 San Francisco, California 94102

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Room 154-A City Hall

San Francisco, CA 94102

CITX-U6RARIAN

lie Library

^ MEETING OF THE BOARD OP PERMIT APPEALS

' urmurcnAxT mav ti noon DOCUMENTS D6pT.

, /-/j WEDNESDAY, MAY 31, 1989

</W MAY 3 0 1989

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL

San chawwi-mJ

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE:

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING:

ITEM A: Letter from Sue Hestor, Esq., on behalf of appellant Nikolas Diaman
requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 89-065. Hearing May 10, 1989. The appellant
had protested the issuance of a permit to alter a building at 2960 Van Ness Avenue.
Upon motion of Commissioner Melbostad, the Board voted 3-2 to overrule the
department. Four votes needed to overrule, the department is upheld and the permit
granted. Commissioner Prior and Vice President Makras dissented.

REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION:

ITEM B: Letter from John Sanger, Esq., representing the Pier 39 Limited Partnership
requesting the Board to reconsider its decision of May 17, 1989, taking jurisdiction
over the Zoning Administrator's determination to accept a Conditional Use Application
,for a new aquarium at Pier 39.

REQUEST FOR REHEARING BEYOND THE 10-DAY REQUEST PERIOD:

ITEM C: Letter from Maryann Dillon, Executive Director, Mission Housing Development
Corporation, requesting the Board to rehear Appeals Nos. 89-021 and 89-022. Hearing
March 8, 1989. The appellant had protested the imposition of penalties for work
done at 1227 Hampshire Street. Upon motion of Vice President Makras, the Board
voted 3-2 to uphold the department and sustain the penalty. Commissioners Marks
& Melbostad dissented.

Public Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker.

APPEAL NO. 89-068

CHARLES & DIANE FRANKEL, Appellants [Protesting issuance on

vs. [March 20, 1989, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Randy George, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Alter a Building

[at 361 Lombard Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8808752.

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (5/15)

APPEAL NO. 89-076

JAWJ GREENWALD, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

vs. [March 31, 1989, to

)EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Howard Cooper & George

|TY PLANNING APPROVAL [E. Shelton, permit to

[Alter a Building at

[970 Chestnut Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8814707.

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (5/27)

IEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, MAY 31, 1989 PAGE TWO

APPEAL NO. 89-088

BRUCE BAXTER, Appellant [Suspension on April 20,

vs. [1989, of Driver Public

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent [Vehicle permit.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/13)

APPEAL NO. 89-084

LESLIE V. SWALL, Appellant [Appealing for Refund

vs. [of Penalty Imposed

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [on May 1, 1989,

[for work done at

[826A Castro Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8906896.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/10)

APPEAL NO. 89-085

CARLETON J. CHAPPELLE, Appellant [Appealing for Refund

vs. [of Penalty Imposed

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [on May 3, 1989,

[for work done at

[472 Utah Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8906216.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/12)

APPEAL NO. 89-091

JOSEPH P. FICURELLI, Appellant [Appealing for Refund

vs. [of Penalty Imposed

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [for work done at

[530-532 Presidio Ave.

[APPLICATION NO. 8819815.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/27)

APPEAL NO. 89-092

KAREN LUM, Appellant [Appealing for Refund

vs. [of Penalty Imposed

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [for work done at

[4367 - 17th Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8813115.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/27)

APPEAL NO. 89-017

GUNTHER GOPP, Appellant [Order to Cease Violation

)) vs. [of the Planning Code,

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [dated January 20, 1989,

[for property located at
[473 Ellis Street.
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/18)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, MAY 31, 1989 PAGE THREE

APPEAL NO. 89-086

ARTCO CONSTRUCTION, Appellant [Denial on May 3, 1989,

vs. [of permit to Alter a

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Building at 71 Rico Way.

[APPLICATION NO. 8818072.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/12)

APPEAL NO. 89-080

IRNESTO J. PULETTI, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

vs. [November 1, 1988, to

)EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Steven Byers, permit to

:iTY PLANNING APPROVAL [Erect a Structure at

[at 352 San Marcos Ave.

[APPLICATION NO. 8718038.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/7)

APPEAL NO. 89-087

JALTER PALMER, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

vs. [April 19, 1989, to

€PT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Elsie Collins, permit

[to Alter a Building

[at 1930 Eddy Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8905240.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/13)

APPEAL NO. 89-094

AROL L. SMITH, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

vs. [May 1, 1989, to Mr. &

:EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Mrs. Alan Zimmerman,

ITY PLANNING APPROVAL [permit to Alter a

[Building at 39 Avila.

[APPLICATION NO. 8901285.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/28)

ublic Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker,

ESTHER Y. MARKS PRESIDENT

VICTOR 6. MAKRAS VICE PRESIDENT

RALPH D. HOUSE COMMISSIONER

PAUL H. HELBOSTAD COMMISSIONER

BEVERLY J. PRIOR COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: In the case of ap-
peal of denials, revocations and suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken shall
speak first and shall be allowed seven (7) minutes for thier presentation and
three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

In cases of multiple appeals of the same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7) min-
utes to present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal and shall
speak consecutively, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for roal arguments and, for each appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such Bust
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing Bust
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room.no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARIH6

Written requests for rehearing Bust be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(415) 554-672C $an Francisco, California 94102

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Room 154-A City Hall

San Francisco, CA 94102

INTER-OFFICE

f f ° & O^uU ^3P

bhltf MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS POCoMent8 DIPT,

WEDNESDAY', JUNE 7, 1989 jUN 2 1389

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL sa* r^Jg%v

■ ' PUBLIC LIBRA1*

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE:

REQUEST FOR REHEARIN6:

ITEM A: Letter from David A. Sauers, Esq., on behalf of Mark C. Jewett, requesting
rehearing of Appeal No. 89-074. Hearing May 17, 1989. Appellant protested the
imposition of penalty for work done at 124 Del Mar Avenue. Upon motion of
Commissioner House, the Board voted to uphold the department's order and sustain
the penalty.

Public Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker.

APPEAL NO. 89-065

NICKOLAS A. DIAMAN, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

vs. [March 31, 1989, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Larry Wasserman, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Alter a Building at

[2960 Van Ness Avenue.

[APPLICATION NO. 8904220.

[FOR REHEARING TODAY. (5/6)

APPEAL NO. 89-093

MARK T. O'LONE, Appellant [Appealing for Refund

vs. [of Penalty Imposed

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [for work done at

[1545 Broadway Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8906751.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/28)

APPEAL NO. 89-097

TIMOTHY E. PELLISSIER, Appellant [Appealing for Refund

5) vs. [of Penalty Imposed

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [on May 9, 1989,

[for work done at

[4339 - 18th Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8907971.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/24)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, JUNE 7, 1989 PAGE TWO

Items 6A through 6F shall be heard together.

APPEAL HO. 88-156

HONG KONG METRO REALTY CO., INC.

vs. Appellant
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL

[Revocation on May 4,
[1988, of permit to
[Alter a Building at
[2987 - 38th Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8803251
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(7/25)

APPEAL NO. 88-157

HONG KONG METRO REALTY CO., INC.

vs. Appellant
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL

[Revocation on May 4,
[1988, of permit to
[Alter a Building at
[3702 Ulloa Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8803253.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(7/25)

APPEAL NO. 88-158

HONG KONG METRO REALTY CO., INC.

vs. Appellant
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL

[Revocation on May 4,
[1988, of permit to
[Alter a Building at
[3712 Ulloa Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8803252,
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(7/25)

APPEAL NO. 88-159

HONG KONG METRO REALTY CO., INC.

vs. Appellant
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL

[Revocation on May 4,
[1988, of permit to
[Alter a Building at
[3722 Ulloa Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8607795,
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(7/25)

APPEAL NO. 88-160

HONG KONG METRO REALTY CO., INC.

vs. Appellant
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL

[Revocation on May 4,
[1988, of permit to
[Alter a Building at
[3734 Ulloa Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8607793.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(7/25)

APPEAL NO. V89-005

HARRY O'BRIEN, Appellant

vs.
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent

[Denial on January 6,
[1989, of Front Setback,
[Rear Yard, Usable Open
[Space, Off - Street
[Parking & Garage/Curb
[Cut Width Variances
[sought at 3702, 3712,
[3722 & 3734 Ulloa St.
[VARIANCE CASE NO. 88.346V
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(2/16)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, JUNE 7, 1989 PAGE THREE

APPEAL NO. V89-082

TOM JAMES, Appellant [Denial on April 17, 1989,

vs. [of Off - Street Parking,

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [Unscreened Parking, and

[Front Setback Variances
[sought for property at
[1450 Masonic Avenue.
[VARIANCE CASE NO. 88.726V.
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/6)

APPEAL NO. 89-100

ROBERT BAKMAZ, Appellant [Denial on May 2, 1989,

vs. [of permit to Alter

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [a Building at 2318

CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL [Leavenworth Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8818527.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/25)

APPEAL NO. 89-083

STEVE OLIN, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

vs. [April 13, 1989, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Mr. and Mrs. Jerold

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Panas, permit to

[Erect a Structure at

[1067 Green Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8802379.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/7)

APPEAL NO. V89-098

•WILLIAM & JOANNE PRIEUR, Appellants [Protesting condition of

vs. [variance granted on May

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [5, 1989, for property

[at 1638 - 1640 Haight St.

[VARIANCE CASE NO. 88.341V.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/24)

APPEAL NO 89-103

WTHONY BROWN, Appellant [Protesting isssuance

vs. [on May 4, 1989, to

)EPT PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [R&D Capital, permit

:iTY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Alter a Building

[at 3741 Buchanan St.

[APPLICATION NO. 8810662.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/27)

) ublic Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker.

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

ESTHER Y. MARKS PRESIDENT

VICTOR 6. MAKRAS VICE PRESIDENT

RALPH D. HOUSE COMMISSIONER

PAUL H. MELBOSTAD COMMISSIONER

BEVERLY J. PRIOR COMMISSIONER

. DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: In the case of ap-
peal of denials, revocations and suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken shall
speak first and shall be allowed seven (7) minutes for thier presentation and
three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

In cases of multiple appeals of the same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7) min-
utes to present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal and shall
speak consecutively, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for roal arguments and, for each appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(415) 554-6720 San Francisco, California 94102

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Room 154-A City Hall

San Francisco, CA 94102

"T.Y. LIBRARIAN
Pub^c Library

30
2

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

WEDNESDAYS-JUNE 21, 1989 documents dept.

5;00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL JUN I 9 1989

SAN FBANCi^y

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE:

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING:

ITEM A: Letter from Jack Wholey, Esq. on behalf of appellants Charles and Diane
Frankel , requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 89-068. Hearings April 26 and May
31, 1989. Appellants protested the issuance of an alteration permit to Randy George
for work done at 361 Lombard Street. The permit was upheld with no conditions.
Commissioner House moved upholding permit with conditions but the vote was only
2 - 3 on the motion. President Marks, Vice President Makras and Commissioner Prior
voted against the motion.

ITEM B: Letter from
and Goerge Shelton,
17, and May 31, 1989.

Mark Himelstein, Esq
requesting rehearing

on behalf of permit holders Howard Cooper
of Appeal No. 89-076. Hearings on May

Appellant Jawj Greenwald protested issuance of an alteration
permit to the permit holders for work done at 970 Chestnut Street. On Commissioner
House's motion to uphold with conditions the Board voted 5-0.

ITEM C: Letter from Kate Dixon, Esq. on behalf of appellant Bruce Baxter, requesting
rehearing of Appeal No. 89-088. Hearing May 31, 1989. The appellant was appealing
the 5-day suspension of his driver public vehicle permit. On Commissioner House's
notion to uphold the department the Board voted 5-0.

'ublic Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker.

'RNESTO J. PULETTI, Appellant

vs.

>EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
ITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 89-080

[Protesting issuance on
[November 1, 1988, to
[Steven Byers, permit to
[Erect a Structure at
[at 352 San Marcos Ave.
[APPLICATION NO. 8718038.
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY,

(6/7)

is 4A and 4B shall be heard together.

APPEAL NO. 89-021

ISSION HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP.,

vs. Appellant
:.PT. PUBLIC WORKS,

Respondent

[Imposition of Penalty
[on February 10, 1989,
[for work done at
[1227 Hampshire Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8814005
[FOR REHEARING TODAY.

(3/22)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, JUNE 21, 1989 PAGE TWO

Items 4A and 4B shall be heard together.

APPEAL NO. 89-022

MISSION HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP., [Imposition of Penalty

vs. Appellant [on February 10, 1989,

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, [for work done at

Respondent [1227 Hampshire Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8815153.

[FOR REHEARING TODAY. (3/22)

APPEAL NO. 89-107

MONTEREY HEIGHTS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC, [Determination on May 9,

vs. Appellant [1989, by the Zoning

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, [Administrator, that the

Respondent [Gurdjieff Foundation at

[85 Saint Elmo Way is
[in compliance with the
[City Planning Code.
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/3)

APPEAL NO. 89-090

EDWARD MITCHELL, Appellant [Appealing for Refund

vs. [of Penalty Imposed

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [on May 9, 1989,

[for work done at

[2906-08 Buchanan St.

[APPLICATION NO. 8907080.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/18)

APPEAL NO. 89-099

>ETER ZINGG, Appellant [Appealing for Refund

vs. [of Penalty Imposed

)EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [on May 16, 1989,

[for work done at

[736 Kirkham Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8903109.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/25)

APPEAL NO. 89-101

UGENE WONG, Appellant [Appealing for Refund

vs. [of Penalty Imposed

EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [on May 16, 1989,

[for work done at

[726 Spruce Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8819230.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/26)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, JUNE 21, 1989 PAGE THREE

APPEAL NO. 89-102

NORMAN SHEARER, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Appealing for Refund
[of Penalty Imposed
[on May 16, 1989,
[for work done at
[726 - 4th Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8905966,
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(6/26)

APPEAL NO. 89-109

ANGELO WILSON, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Imposition of Penalty
[on May 26, 1989, '
[for work done at
[334 Duncan Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8907054,
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(7/5)

APPEAL NO. 89-110

HANS REIMAN, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Imposition of Penalty
[on May 25, 1989, "
[for work done at
[634 Shotwell Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8909117
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(7/5)

APPEAL NO. 89-112

PETER KERESZTURY, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Imposition of Penalty
[on May 26, 1989, '
[for work done at
[53 Page Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8907871
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(7/9)

OUNG ANN KIM & IN KYUNG KIM,

vs. Appellants
EALTH DEPARTMENT,

Respondent
ITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 87-302

[Denial on October 9,
[1987, of permit to
[Operate a Restaurant
[at 92 Judah Street.
[(Joky's Place).
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(11/28)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, JUNE 21, 1989 PAGE FOUR

APPEAL NO. 89-104

MARYANNA G. SHAW, Appellant [Suspension on May 3, 1989,

\) vs. [of construction of fence

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [at 2550 Divisadero Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8707787.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/25)

APPEAL WO. 89-113
JOAN M. CROWLEY, Appellant [Revocation on May 15,

vs. [1989, of permit to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Alter a Building at

CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL [1164-66 Filbert Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8717236.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/9)

APPEAL WO. 89-111

BLANCA MARTINEZ, Appellant [Denial on May 24, 1989,

) vs. [by Bureau of Building

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Inspection, of permit

[to Legalize windows on
[(3) three-unit house at
[1330 Valencia Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8905280.
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/5)

APPEAL WO. 89-108
STEVEN & CATHY WEINDEL & E. ROBERT [Protesting issuance on

SCROFANI, Appellants [May 9, 1989, to

vs. [George Vasil, permit

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [to Erect a Structure

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [at 320 Collingwood St.

[APPLICATION NO. 8713739.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/3)

1 Public Cooment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker.

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

ESTHER Y. MARKS PRESIDENT

VICTOR 6. MAKRAS VICE PRESIDENT

RALPH D. HOUSE COMMISSIONER

PAUL H. MELBOSTAD COMMISSIONER

BEVERLY J. PRIOR COMMISSIONER

.. DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTIOH 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: In the case of ap-
peal of denials, revocations and suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken shall
speak first and shall be allowed seven (7) minutes for thier presentation and
three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

In cases of multiple appeals of the same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7) min-
utes to present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal and shall
speak consecutively, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for roal arguments and, for each appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(415) 554-6720 San Francisco, California 94102

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Room 154-A City Hall

San Francisco, CA 94102

Public Library

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

"DOCUMENTS D£PT.

WEDNESDAYS JUNE 28, 1989

iti(l<{

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL

J UN ,3 6 1989

PIIHIJC LIROApv

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE:

REQUEST FOR REHEARING:

ITEM A: Letter from Robert Bakmaz requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 89-100.
Hearing June 7, 1989. The appellant, Robert Bakmaz, had protested the denial of
permit to alter a building at 2318 Leavenworth Street. Upon motion of Commissioner
Melbostad, the Board voted 3 - 2 to uphold the Department and deny the permit.
(Vice President Makras and Commissioner House dissented.) Four votes being necessary
to overrule the department, the order is upheld and the permit denied.

) Public Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker.

APPEAL NO 89-103

ANTHONY BROWN, Appellant [Protesting isssuance

vs. [on May 4, 1989, to

DEPT PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [R&D Capital, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Alter a Building

[at 3741 Buchanan St.

[APPLICATION NO. 8810662.

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (6/27)

APPEAL NO. 89-106

TELEGRAPH TERRACE HOMEOWNERS ASSOC, [Protesting issuance on

vs. Appellants [May 8, 1989, of

POLICE DEPARTMENT, [Dancehall Keeper permit

Respondent [at 1800 Montgomery

[Street, dba "Bentley's
[Restaurant/Bar".
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/2)

APPEAL NO. 89-114

THOMAS & BARBARA MCGRATH, Appellants [Protesting issuance on

(i vs. [February 2, 1989, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Gary Gin, permit to

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Alter a Building at

[1234 Ulloa Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8816310.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/9)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, JUNE 28, 1989 PAGE TWO_

Items 6A and 6B shall be heard together.

APPEAL NO. 89-116

STANLEY DINTCHO, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

A) vs. [May 19, 1989, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Mike Feldman, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Demolish a Building

[at 2240 Union Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8714225.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/11)

APPEAL NO. 89-118

GORDON & MARY TOM, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

3) vs. [May 19, 1989, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Mike Feldman, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Erect a Structure

[at 2240 Union Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8710794.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/11)

APPEAL NO. 89-089

THOMAS MOORE, Appellant [Order to Cease Violation

vs. [of the Planning Code

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [dated April 25, 1989,

[for property located at
[545 Burnett Avenue.
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/14)

APPEAL NO. V89-095

RICHARD GOSSEN, Appellant [Denial on May 5, 1989,

vs. [of Cut Curb and Maximum

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [Garage Door Width Variance

[sought for property at

[3269 Harrison Street.

[VARIANCE CASE NO. 88.711V.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/21)

Public Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker.

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

ESTHER Y. MARKS PRESIDENT

VICTOR G. MAKRAS VICE PRESIDENT

RALPH D. HOUSE COMMISSIONER

PAUL H. MELBOSTAD COMMISSIONER

BEVERLY J. PRIOR COMMISSIONER

„ DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: In the case of ap-
peal of denials, revocations and suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken shall
speak first and shall be allowed seven (7) minutes for thier presentation and
three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

In cases of multiple appeals of the same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7) min-
utes to present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal and shall
speak consecutively, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for roal arguments and, for each appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(4.1$). 554-6720 San Francisco, California 94102

BOARD OF PERMIUPPttlS

Room 154* MY Hall

San Francisco, CA94H"

"D^*^

CITY LIBRARIAN
Public Library

P30 Zj\frjL*^ r£p

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

WEDNESDAY/ JULY 12, 1989 documents

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL JUL 10 1989

Can j-»v/-u«v^i^oO

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE:

REQUEST FOR REHEARING:

ITEM A: Letter from Hans Reiman, appellant, requesting rehearing of Appeal No.
89-110. Hearing June 21, 1989. The appellant protested the imposition of a penalty
for work done at 634 Shotwell Street. Upon motion of Vice President Makras, the
Board voted 5 - 0 to uphold the department and sustain the penalty.

CORRESPONDENCE FOR DISCUSSION:

ITEM B: Letter from Carolyn and Kirsti Aho regarding construction of garage at
4660 - 25th Street. Discussion of this matter continued from hearing of June 28,
1989.

FOR ADOPTION OF FINDINGS ONLY: Public hearing closed.

ITEM C: Appeal No. 89-107. Hearing June 21, 1989. Upon motion of Commissioner
House, the Board voted 5 - 0 to overrule the Zoning Administrator's Determination
concerning the Gurdjieff Foundation.

ITEM D: Appeal Nos. 88-156 through 88-160; and V89-005. Hearing June 7, 1989.
Upon motion of Vice President Makras, the Board voted 5 - 0 to overrule the Zoning
Administrator and to reinstate the five permits and grant the variances subject
to conditions.

Public Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker.

APPEAL NO. 89-124

KAI-MIN JEN & JACK TSENG, [Denial on June 2,

vs. Appellants [1989, of permit for a

POLICE DEPARTMENT, [Massage Establishment,

Respondent [dba "Fantasy Massage"

[at 960 Harrison Street.
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/18)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, JULY 12, 1989 PAGE TWO

APPEAL NO. 89-125

BUNGORN MASON, Appellant [Denial on May 24, 1989,

\) vs. [of Masseuse permit at

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent [455 Ellis Street.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/18)

APPEAL NO. 89-120

EDWARD BAKER & HARRY BARLOW, [Protesting issuance on

) vs. Appellants [May 23, 1989, to Kirk

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Leonard Moon, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Alter a Building at

[1642 - 16th Avenue.

[APPLICATION NO. 8807366.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/16)

APPEAL NO. 89-115

TOM CORBETT, Appellant [Appealing for Refund

vs. [of Penalty Imposed

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [on June 1, 1989,

[for work done at

[2015 - 17th Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8905100.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/11)

APPEAL NO. 89-121

JOHN STERN, Appellant [Imposition of Penalty

vs. [on June 6, 1989,

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [for work done at

[48 Pearl Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8820188.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/16)

APPEAL NO. 89-127

KRUEGER BROTHERS BUILDERS, Appellant [Appealing for Refund

vs. [of Penalty Imposed

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [on June 6, 1989,

[for work done at

[425 - 18th Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8907515.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/24)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, JULY 12, 1989 PAGE THREE

APPEAL NO. 89-053

CASA DE LA RAZA, INC., Appellant [Denial of Alteration

)) vs. [permit by Bureau of

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Building Inspection

[on March 14, 1989,
[to change occupancy
[classification from
[R-3 to E-3 to allow
[a child care facility
[at 90 Bartlett Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8816173.
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/2)

APPEAL NO. 89-108

STEVEN & CATHY WEINDEL & E. ROBERT [Protesting issuance on

SCROFANI, Appellants [May 9, 1989, to

0) vs. [George Vasil, permit

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [to Erect a Structure

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [at 320 Collingwood St.

[APPLICATION NO. 8713739.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/3)

APPEAL NO. 89-122

JOE LING JUNG, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

I) vs. [May 23, 1989, to Peter

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [& Mary Fung, permit to

[Alter a Building at
[1449 Leavenworth Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8907747
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

APPEAL NO. 89-123

MARIA HERMAN, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

1 ) vs. [May 25, 1989, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Dominic Maionchi, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Alter a Building

[at 3320 Fillmore Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8906309
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

APPEAL NO. 89-126

ANNE MARGARET TOWER, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

[1) vs. [May 25, 1989, to S.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Ianterno, permit to

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Alter a Building at

[734 - 14th Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8812790.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

Public Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker.

rmriDLfto ur inn duhimj ur rLi\ni i MrrcHLo

ESTHER Y. MARKS PRESIDENT

VICTOR 6. MAKRAS VICE PRESIDENT

RALPH D. HOUSE COMMISSIONER

PAUL H. MELBOSTAD COMMISSIONER

BEVERLY J. PRIOR COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: In the case of ap-
peal of denials, revocations and suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken shall
speak first and shall be allowed seven (7) minutes for thier presentation and
three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

In cases of multiple appeals of the same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7) min-
utes to present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal and shall
speak consecutively, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for roal arguments and, for each appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(415) 554-6720 San Francisco, California 94102

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Room 154-A City Hal!

San Francisco, CA 94102

CITY LIBRARIAN
Public Library

p(f^

4 7 JUL 1 3 ]%s

A MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS mmnm

+ CbeJU. Wednesday; July 19, 1989 documents dept.

"V 5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL JUL 181989

SAN FRANCISCO
°ueuc URRARv

HATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE:

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING:

ITEM A: Letter from Frederick Allardyce requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 89-106.
Hearing June 28, 1989. The appellant had protested the issuance of a Dancehall
Keeper permit at 1800 Montgomery Street, dba "Bentley's Restaurant/Bar." Upon motion
of Vice President Makras, the Board voted 3 - 2 to uphold the Department and grant
the permit.

ITEM B: Letter from Philip J. Siggins, Esq., on behalf of appellant Thomas Moore,
requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 89-089. Hearing June 28, 1989. The appellant
had protested the Zoning Administrator's Order to Cease Violation of the Planning
Code for property located at 545 Burnett Avenue. Upon motion of Vice President
Makras, the Board voted 5 - 0 to uphold the Zoning Administrator's Order.

ITEM C: Letter from Bradley D. Heinz requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 89-103.
Hearing June 28, 1989. The appellant, Mr. Heinz, protested the issuance on May
4, 1989, to R & D Capital, permit to alter a building at 3741 Buchanan Street.
Upon motion of Vice President Makras, the Board voted 3 - 2 to uphold the Department
and grant the permit. President Marks and Commissioner Melbostad dissented.

ITEM D: Letter from Robert W. Passmore, Zoning Administrator, requesting rehearing
of Appeal No. 87-302. Hearing June 21, 1989. The appellants had appealed the Zoning
Adminstrator's denial of permit to operate outdoor seating for a restaurant at 92
Judah Street. (Joky's Place.) Upon motion of Vice President Makras, the Board
voted 5 - 0 to uphold the Zoning Administrator's Order and deny the permit subject
to conditions.

Public Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker,

APPEAL NO. 89-080

ERNESTO J. PULETTI, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

vs. [November 1, 1988, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Steven Byers, permit to

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Erect a Structure at

[at 352 San Marcos Ave.

[APPLICATION NO. 8718038.

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (6/7)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, JULY 19, 1989 PAGE TWO

APPEAL NO. 89-073

ANDREAS VON FOERSTER, Appellant
0 vs.

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent

[Determination by the
[Zoning Administrator
[on March 28, 1989,
[that the proposal
[does not conform to
[Planning Code Section
[132 (b) & Residential
[Design Guidelines at
[128 Montcalm Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8902465.
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY.

(5/22)

APPEAL NO. 89-128

PAGO PRINTING, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Imposition of Penalty
[on June 14, 1989,
[for work done at
[423m - 26th Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8905573,
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(7/24)

JOHNNY UGAY, JR., Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

APPEAL NO. 89-130

[Appealing for Refund
[of Penalty Imposed
[on June 9, 1989,
[for work done at
[1676 Fulton Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8909982
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(7/25)

TODD MAERWITZ, Appellant

APPEAL NO. 89-133

vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Imposition of Penalty
[on June 22, 1989, for
[work done at 430-432
[Connecticut Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8909989
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(8/1)

APPEAL NO. 89-135

VINCENT CORCUCHIA, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Appealing for Refund
[of Penalty imposed on
[June 27, 1989, for work
[done at 110 Lyon Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8911216
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(8/6)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, JULY 19, 1989 PAGE THREE

APPEAL NO. 89-137

PHILIP WAGNER, Appellant [Imposition of Penalty

) vs. [on June 27, 1989,

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [for work done at

[2817 Pine Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8909482.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/6)

APPEAL NO. 89-129

PHILIP BELLBER & CAROLYN BLAIR, [Denial on May 30, 1989,

l) vs. Appellants [of request for placing

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [tables & chairs in front

ISCOTT DISAPPROVAL [of "Spaghetti Western"

[at 576 Haight Street.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/24)

Items 11A and 11B shall be heard together.

APPEAL NO. 89-116

STANLEY DINTCHO, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

\\) vs. [May 19, 1989, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Mike Feldman, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Demolish a Building

[at 2240 Union Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8714225.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/11)

APPEAL NO. 89-118

GORDON & MARY TOM, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

11) vs. [May 19, 1989, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Mike Feldman, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Erect a Structure

[at 2240 Union Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8710794,
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

APPEAL NO. 89-066

B. F. HERMAN III, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

l; vs. [December 21, 1988, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Eugene Gill is, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Alter a Building at

[1246 Sacramento Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8808885.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (5/6)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, JULY 19, 1989 PAGE FOUR

APPEAL NO. 89-117

WILLIAM & ROSA FRITH, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

3) vs. [May 19, 1989, to Jeffrey

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Maso and Beverly Langer,

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [permit to Alter a

[Building at 674-29th St.

[APPLICATION NO. 8800906.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/12)

APPEAL NO. 89-134

FERN DASTREVIGNE, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

) vs. [June 9, 1989, to Robert

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Carr & Andrea Lopinto,

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [permit to Alter a Building

[at 725 Euclid Avenue.

[APPLICATION NO. 8904742.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/2)

APPEAL NO. 89-136

THOMAS S. & SUE V. MULLIKIN, [Protesting issuance on

Appellants [June 16, 1989, to Sue

1) vs. [San Lee Fong, permit to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Alter a Building at

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [333 Christopher Drive.

[APPLICATION NO. 8820519.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/6)

APPEAL NO. V89-096

STEVE E. DROLAPAS, Appellant ' [Denial on May 5, 1989, of

1) vs. [Rear Yard and Obstructions

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [Over Street/Alley Variances

[Sought for property at

[2109 - 41st Avenue.

[VARIANCE CASE NO. 88.640V.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/24)

•

APPEAL NO. V89-131

M.F. & L.L. VIRJEE, Appellants [Denial on June 12, 1989, of

vs. [Off-Street Parking, Rear

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [Yard and Exposure of A

[Dwelling Unit Variances
[Sought for property located
[at 229 Corbett Avenue.
[VARIANCE CASE NO. 88.747V.
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/30)

H Public Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker.

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

ESTHER Y. MARKS PRESIDENT

VICTOR G. MAKRAS VICE PRESIDENT

RALPH D. HOUSE COMMISSIONER

PAUL H. MELBOSTAD COMMISSIONER

BEVERLY J. PRIOR COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: In the case of ap-
peal of denials, revocations and suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken shall
speak first and shall be allowed seven (7) minutes for thier presentation and
three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

In cases of multiple appeals of the same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7) min-
utes to present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal and shall
speak consecutively, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for roal arguments and, for each appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(415) ~54-6?20 San Francisco, California 94102

WW •«.

SlV3ddV 11W<. iW8

p30 MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

* % WEDNESDAY; AUGUST 2, 1989 documents dept.

nZl^ 5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL AUG i ms

°'»R|JO ' JRDARV

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE:

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING:

ITEM A: Letter from Harry Barlow requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 89-120. Hearing
July 12, 1989. The appellant had protested the issuance to Kirk Leonard Moon, permit
to alter a building at 1642 - 16th Avenue. Upon motion of Commissioner Melbostad,
the Board voted 3 - 2 to overrule the department. Vice President Makras and
Commissioner Prior dissented. The department was upheld and the permit granted.

ITEM B: Letter from Pamela S. Duffy, Esq., on behalf of the Gurdjieff Foundation,
requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 89-107. Hearing June 21, 1989. Findings of
fact adopted July 12, 1989. The appellants had protested the Zoning Administrator's
determination dated May 9, 1989, that the Gurdjieff Foundation was in compliance
with the City Planning Code at 85 Saint Elmo Way. Upon motion of Commissioner House,
the Board voted 5 - 0 to overrule the Zoning Administrator's determination that
the Gurdjieff Foundation was in compliance with the City Planning Code at 85 Saint
Elmo Way.

ITEM C: Letter from Anne Margaret Tower requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 89-126.
Hearing July 12, 1989. The appellant had protested the issuance of permit to erect
a 6-unit residential building at 734-14th Street. Upon motion of Vice President
Makras, the Board voted 5-0 to uphold the department and grant the permit.

CORRESPONDENCE FOR DISCUSSION:

ITEM D : Letter from Carolyn and Kirsti Aho regarding construction of garage at
4660 - 25th Street. Discussion of this matter continued from hearing of June 28,
1989.

Public Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker,

APPEAL NO. 89-122

JOE LING JUNG, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

vs. [May 23, 1989, to Peter

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [& Mary Fung, permit to

[Alter a Building at

[1449 Leavenworth Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8907747.

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (7/17)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, AUGUST 2, 1989 PAGE TWO

APPEAL NO. 89-147

VIRGILIO D. CAPATI, Appellant [Appealing for Refund

vs. [of Penalty Imposed

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [on July 3, 1989,

[for work done at
[585 Anderson Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8908014
[FOR HEARING TODAY (8/19)

APPEAL NO. 89-148

EDWARD W. KAENEL, Appellant [Appealing for Refund

vs. [of Penalty Imposed

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [on June 28, 1989,

[for work done at
[337 Capp Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8911343
[FOR HEARING TODAY (8/19)

APPEAL NO. 89-110

HANS REIMAN, Appellant [Imposition of Penalty

[) vs. [on May 25, 1989,

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [for work done at

[634 Shotwell Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8909117.

[FOR REHEARING TODAY. (7/5)

APPEAL NO. 89-143

STERGOIS PAPADOPOULOS, Appellant [Imposition of Penalty

vs. [on July 5, 1989,

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [for work done at

[2582 - 19th Avenue.

[APPLICATION NO. 8903898.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/14)

APPEAL NO. 89-119

SHAIKH & FATIMA USMAN, Appellants [Denial on June 5,

vs. [1989, of permit to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Alter a Building

[at 166 Turk Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8904434.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/15)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, AUGUST 2, 1989 PAGE THREE

Items 9A and 9B shall be heard together.

APPEAL NO. 89-138

SUZANNE WALLACE, Appellant
\) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[June 19, 1989, to Rettke
[Construction, permit to
[Demolish a Building at
[154 Gates Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8712591,
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(8/7)

APPEAL NO. 89-140

SUZANNE WALLACE, Appellant
:) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[June 19, 1989, Rettke
[Construction, permit to
[Erect a Structure at
[154 Gates Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8712592.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(8/9)

APPEAL NO. 89-139

)

FRANK YEE, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[June 20, 1989, to
[Lino D'Silva, permit
[to Alter a Building
[at 1914 Clement Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 88158115
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(8/8)

APPEAL NO. 89-141

NORMAN C. STONE, Appellant
I) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

"[Protesting issuance on
[June 16, 1989, to
[Donna Garolla, permit
[to Alter a Building at
[2320-2322 Broadway St.
[APPLICATION NO. 8816719.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(8/9)

APPEAL NO. 89-142

KONRAD & MARGO BORS, Appellant
1 1 vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[June 28, 1989, to
[Richard Fiore, permit to
[Alter a Building at
[779 Carolina Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8904260.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(8/14)

APPEAL NO. 89-144

MR. SUE M. JEW, Appellant
l: vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[June 21, 1989, to
[Morgan Montague, permit
[Alter a Building at
[60 Clifford Terrace.
[APPLICATION NO. 890073.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(8/15)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, AUGUST 2, 1989 PAGE FOUR

APPEAL NO. 89-145

JERRY F. SCHIMMEL, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

\) vs. [June 23, 1989, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Jeremias Zeuli, permit to

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Erect a Structure at

[61 Prentiss Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8701259.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/16)

APPEAL NO. 89-146

SHIRLEY MARTINEZ, Appellant [Protesting issuance

) vs. [June 26, 1989, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Martin Ryan, permit to

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Erect a Structure at

[474 Joost Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8602097
[FOR HEARING TODAY (8/19)

APPEAL NO. 89-158

DARYL L. SEIFERT, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

) vs. [June 30, 1989, to S.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Ayanian & L. Filian,

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [permit to Alter a

[Building at 1142 -

[1144 Mariposa Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8908740.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/23)

APPEAL NO. V89-132

LEONARD GAGE, Appellant [Denial on June 12, 1989

1) vs. [of Rear Yard Variance

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [Sought for property

[located at 610 Oak St.

[VARIANCE CASE NO. 89.036V.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/2)

II Public Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker.

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

ESTHER Y. MARKS PRESIDENT

VICTOR 6. MAKRAS VICE PRESIDENT

RALPH D. HOUSE COMMISSIONER

PAUL H. MELBOSTAD COMMISSIONER

BEVERLY J. PRIOR COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: In the case of ap-
peal of denials, revocations and suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken shall
speak first and shall be allowed seven (7) minutes for thier presentation and
three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

In cases of multiple appeals of the same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7) min-
utes to present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal and shall
speak consecutively, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for roal arguments and, for each appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(415) 554-6720 San Francisco, California 94102

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Room 154-A City Hall

San Francisco, CA 94152

^ MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS ^llMMrP1!imM.

po^ DOCUMENTS DEPT.

WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 9, 1989 AUG 8l989

Vs^

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL «** tKANweeo

■g, Chud^

U||«» _»ri 1 IRDADV

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE:

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING:

ITEM A: Letter from Ben Herman requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 89-066. Hearing
July 19, 1989. The appellant had protested the issuance of permit to alter a
building at 1246 Sacramento Street. Upon motion of Vice President Makras, the Board
voted 3-2 to uphold the Department and grant the permit. Commissioners Prior and
House dissented.

ITEM B: Letter from Philip L. Wagner requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 89-137.
Hearing July 19, 1989. Appellant had protested the imposition of penalty for work
done at 2817 Pine Street. Upon motion of Commissioner House, the Board voted 4-1
to uphold the Department. Commissioner Prior dissented.

ITEM C: Letter from Jeffrey B. Maso requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 89-117.
Hearing July 19, 1989. The appellants, William and Rosa Frith, had protested the
issuance to Jeffrey Maso and Beverly Langer of permit to alter a building at 674-29th
Street. Upon motion of Commissioner Melbostad, the Board voted 4-1 to uphold the
Department and grant the permit subject to conditions.

Public Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker.

APPEAL NO. 89-080

ERNESTO J. PULETTI, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

vs. [November 1, 1988, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Steven Byers, permit to

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Erect a Structure at

[at 352 San Marcos Ave.

[APPLICATION NO. 8718038.

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (6/7)

APPEAL NO. 89-139

FRANK YEE, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

vs. [June 20, 1989, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Lino D'Silva, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Alter a Building

[at 1914 Clement Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 88158115.

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (8/8)

APPEAL NO. 89-150

HANG. T. TRAN, Appellant [Denial on July 6, 1989,

) vs# [of Masseuse Permit at

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent [1172 Sutter Street.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/20)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, AUGUST 9, 1989 PAGE TWO

APPEAL NO. 89-153

MANDY TUBBS, Appellant [Suspension on June 28,

vs. [1989, of Massage

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent [Establishment Permit

[at 461 Sutter Street.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/21)

APPEAL NO. 89-155

WONG ELECTRIC, INC., Appellant [Imposition of Penalty

vs. [on July 14, 1989,

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [for work done at

[625 - 2nd Street.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/23)

APPEAL NO. 89-151

GINA E. SOLIS, Appellant [Denial on July 10,

vs. [1989, of permit to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Alter a Building at

CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL [235-239 Pixley St.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/20)

APPEAL NO. 89-152

KATHLEEN K. RAWLINGS, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

vs. [June 27, 1989, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Leslie Natal i, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Alter a Building

[at 32 States Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8811775.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/21)

APPEAL NO. 89-154

MS. FERRIS CRANE, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

vs. [June 28, 1989, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Raymond and Patricia

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Rochon, permit to

[Alter a Building at
[3733 Clay Street.
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/21)

APPEAL NO. 89-157

ROBERT G. NELSON, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

) vs. [June 29, 1989, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [David Fong, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Alter a Building

»[at 125 Robinhood Drive.
[APPLICATION NO. 8812803.
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/23)

Public Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker.

riLriDLKQ ur inn dumku ur munii HrrxHLo

ESTHER Y. MARKS PRESIDENT

VICTOR 6. MAKRAS VICE PRESIDENT

RALPH D. HOUSE COMMISSIONER

PAUL H. MELBOSTAD COMMISSIONER

BEVERLY J. PRIOR COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: In the case of ap-
peal of denials, revocations and suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken shall
speak first and shall be allowed seven (7) minutes for thier presentation and
three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

In cases of multiple appeals of the same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7) min-
utes to present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal and shall
speak consecutively, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for roal arguments and, for each appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(415} 554-6720 San Francisco, California 94102

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Room 154-A City Hall

San Francisco, CA 94102

•

fz^

-6i

Public Library

0 sd>^ JfoGENbFQ

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 23, 1989

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282/ CITY HALL

>\n

DOCUMENTS D£PT.

AUG 2 2 1989

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE:

FOR ADOPTION OF FINDINGS ONLY:

ITEM A: Appeal No. 89-158. Public hearing held August 2, 1989. Upon motion of
Vice President Makras, the Board voted 5-0 to uphold the department subject
to conditions and grant the permit for 1142-1144 Mariposa Street.

ITEM B : Appeal Nos. 88-156 through 88-160; and V89-005. Public hearing held
June 7, 1989. Upon motion of Vice President Makras, the Board voted 5 - 0 to
overrule the Zoning Administrator and, subject to conditions, to reinstate the five
permits for 3702, 3712, 3722 Ulloa Street, 2987-38th Avenue and grant the variance.

Public Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker,

APPEAL NO. 89-073

ANDREAS VON FOERSTER, Appellant [Determination by the

vs. [Zoning Administrator

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [on March 28, 1989,

[that the proposal
[does not conform to
[Planning Code Section
[132 (b) & Residential
[Design Guidelines at
[128 Montcalm Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8902465.
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (5/22)

APPEAL NO. 89-122

JOE LING JUNG, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

\) vs. [May 23, 1989, to Peter

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [& Mary Fung, permit to

[Alter a Building at

[1449 Leavenworth Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8907747.

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (7/17)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, AUGUST 23, 1989 PAGE TWO

APPEAL NO. 89-080

ERNESTO J. PULETTI, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[November 1, 1988, to
[Steven Byers, permit to
[Erect a Structure at
[at 352 San Marcos Ave.
[APPLICATION NO. 8718038.
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY

(6/7)

APPEAL NO. 89-124

KAI-MIN JEN & JACK

vs.
POLICE DEPARTMENT,

Respondent

TSENG,
Appellants

[Denial on June 2,
[1989, of permit for a
[Massage Establishment,
[dba "Fantasy Massage"
[at 960 Harrison Street.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(7/18)

APPEAL NO. 89-153

MANDY TUBBS, Appellant

vs.
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent

[Suspension on

June 28,

[1989,

Massage

[Establ

ishment

Permit

[at 461

Sutter

Street.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(8/21)

APPEAL NO. 89-161

DONALD D. MCCRUM,

vs.
POLICE DEPARTMENT,

Appellant
Respondent

[Denial on July 6,
[1989, of Tow Car
[Operator permit at
[359 Potrero Avenue.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(8/27)

APPEAL NO. 89-159

WILLIAM VERSACI, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Imposition of Penalty
[on July 17, 1989,
[for work done at
[2950-52 Pine Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8907637
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(8/26)

APPEAL NO. 89-162

ROGER GEOFFROY, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Appealing for Refund
[of Penalty Imposed
[on July 18, 1989,
[for work done at
[2006 - 22nd Street.
[APPLICATION NOS.
[8908269 & 8909087.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(8/29)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, AUGUST 23, 1989 PAGE THREE

APPEAL NO. 88-219

JAMES L. GATTEN, Appellant [Denial on August 16,

vs. [1988, of permit to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Alter a Building at

CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL [1975 - 8th Avenue.

[APPLICATION NO. 8808193.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/25)

APPEAL NO. 89-164

BEATRIZ & FERNANDO NAVARRETE, [Protesting issuance on

Appellants [July 5, 1989, to

vs. [Mr. Bykin, permit to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Alter a Building at

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [1355 - 27th Avenue.

[APPLICATION NO. 8807480.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/27)

APPEAL NO. 89-165

LUBA TROYANOVSKY, Appellant [Protesting condition

vs. [imposed on July 7,

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [1989, by DAHI requiring

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [fireproof materials

[or sprinklers at

[248-252 - 8th Avenue.

[APPLICATION NO. 8816170.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/30)

APPEAL NO. 89-169

B. F. HERMAN, III, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

vs. [July 12, 1989, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Gene Gill is, permit to

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Alter a Building at

[1246 Sacramento St.

[APPLICATION NO. 8910863.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/5)

APPEAL NO. V89-096

STEVE E. DROLAPAS, Appellant [Denial on May 5, 1989,

5] vs. [of Rear Yard and

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [Obstructions Over St./

[Alley Variances Sought
[for property located
[at 2109 - 41st Avenue.
[VARIANCE CASE NO. 88.640V.
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (6/24)

6)Public Conment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker,

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

ESTHER Y. MARKS PRESIDENT

VICTOR G. MAKRAS VICE PRESIDENT

RALPH D. HOUSE COMMISSIONER

PAUL H. MELBOSTAD COMMISSIONER

BEVERLY J. PRIOR COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: In the case of ap-
peal of denials, revocations and suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken shall
speak first and shall be allowed seven (7) minutes for thier presentation and
three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

In cases of multiple appeals of the same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7) min-
utes to present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal and shall
speak consecutively, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for roal arguments and, for each appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(415) 554-6720 San Francisco, California 94102

ZQm VO 'oosioubjj UBS
l|BH Alio V-WT mo^

sivHddtf iiwa3d jo aavoa

2>o/&<i

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS documents dep_t.
WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 30, 1989 Au G 3 0 1989

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL

SAN FRAttWiaCO

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE:

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING:

ITEM A: Letter from Thomas Steel, Esq. on behalf of Hang T. Tran requesting
rehearing of Appeal No. 89-150. Hearing August 9, 1989. The appellant had protested
the denial of masseuse permit at 1172 Sutter Street. Upon motion of Commissioner
House, the Board voted 3-1 to overrule the department (Vice President Makras
dissented). Four votes needed to overrule the department, therefore the department
is upheld and the permit denied.

Public Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker.

APPEAL NO. 89-153

MANDY TUBBS, Appellant

vs.
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent

[Suspension on June 28,
[1989, of Massage
[Establishment Permit
[at 461 Sutter Street.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(8/21)

APPEAL NO. 89-166

SHELBA AND JOHN KETCHUM, dba
CHICAGO HOT DOGS, Appellant
vs.
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent

"[Denial on April 29, 1989,
[of permit for Mechanical
[Amusement Devices at
[3227 - 16th Street.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(9/1)

KEITH KRUMBACH, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

APPEAL NO. 89-163

"[Appealing for Refund
[of Penalty Imposed
[on July 7, 1989,
[for work done at
[2401 Turk Boulevard.
[APPLICATION NO. 8904977
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(8/30)

APPEAL NO. 89-170

LYLE FREDRICKSON, Appellant
) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Imposition of Penalty
[on July 28, 1989,
[for work done at
[193 Corbett Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8912435,
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(9/6)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, AUGUST 30, 1989 PAGE TWO

APPEAL NO. 89-173

DONA CANDELA, Appellant [Appealing for Refund

vs. [of Penalty Imposed

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [on July 21, 1989,

[for work done at

[722 Wisconsin Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8909618.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/10)

APPEAL NO. 89-168

MICHAEL O'BRIEN, Appellant [Denial on July 10,

vs. [1989, of permit to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Erect a Structure

CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL [at 901 Texas Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8905305.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/27)

APPEAL NO. 89-177

CHANG H. LEE, Appellant [Denial on August 9,

vs. [1989, of permit to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Alter a Building at

[20 Camp Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8906654.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/13)

APPEAL NO. 89-007

GREATER-WEST PORTAL NEIGHBORHOOD [Protesting issuance on

ASSOCIATION, Appellant [January 4, 1989, to

) vs. [Barry Kane, permit to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Demolish a Building at

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [14 Edgehill Way.

[APPLICATION NO. 8718138.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (3/1)

APPEAL NO. 89-167

JULIAN B. DENEBEIM, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

vs. [July 14, 1989, to Edmund

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [and Nora Chiu, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Alter a Building at

[542 - 24th Avenue.

[APPLICATION NO. 8717352.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/26

APPEAL NO. 89-171

CAROL OCHLAN, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

) vs. [July 21, 1989, to L. Kam

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Lee & Cathryn Lee, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Alter a Building at

[511 Lawton Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 89022852.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/6)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, AUGUST 30, 1989 PAGE THREE

)

SARA M. ANDERSON, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 89-178

[Protesting issuance on
[July 26, 1989, to
[Ena Kwok, permit to
[Alter a Building at
[1915 - 32nd Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8808184.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

Items 14A through 14C shall be heard together.

APPEAL NO. 89-183

THE NEW BAYVIEW COMMITTEE,

Appellant
LA) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[July 28, 1989, to General
[Brewing Company, permit
[to Demolish a Building
[at 2601 Newhall Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8904272.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

APPEAL NO. 89-184

(THE NEW BAYVIEW COMMITTEE,
Appellant
LB) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[July 28, 1989, to General
[Brewing Company, permit
[to Demolish a Building
[at 2601 Newhall Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8904273.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

APPEAL NO. 89-183

THE NEW BAYVIEW COMMITTEE,

Appellant
1C) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[July 28, 1989, to General
[Brewing Company, permit
[to Demolish a Building
[at 2601 Newhall Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8904274.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

APPEAL NO. V89-179

JERRY WINBERG & WILLIAM FINLEY,

Appellants
1) vs.

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent

[Denial on August 2, 1989,
[of Off-Street Parking,
[Rear Yard and Exposure of
[a Dwelling Unit variances
[sought for property located
[at 149 Corbett Avenue.
[VARIANCE CASE NO. 88.757V.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(9/i8;

1) Public Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker.

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

ESTHER Y. MARKS PRESIDENT

VICTOR G. MAKRAS VICE PRESIDENT

RALPH D. HOUSE COMMISSIONER

PAUL H. MELBOSTAD COMMISSIONER

BEVERLY J. PRIOR COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: In the case of ap-
peal of denials, revocations and suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken shall
speak first and shall be allowed seven (7) minutes for thier presentation and
three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

In cases of multiple appeals of the same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7) min-
utes to present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal and shall
speak consecutively, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for roal arguments and, for each appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(415) 554-6720 San Francisco, California 94102

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Room 154-A City Hall

San Francisco, CA 94182

ciTr-b^aR/\RIAN

Public Library

-)?

O *£

i2 / MEETING OF THE BOARD QF PERMIT APPEAL^ u:vlL7;TG D_.

U%/&\ WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 1989 S£P x x m3 ^ '

c.nn d m doom ooo riTV uai i c*. __

5;00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL san franco

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE:

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING:

ITEM A: Letter from Jerry Klein on behalf of appellants Kai-Min Jen and Jack Tseng
requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 89-124. Hearing August 23, 1989. The appellants
had protested the denial of permit for a massage establishment at 960 Harrison
Street. Upon motion of Vice President Makras, the Board voted 2-2 to overrule the
department and grant the permit (Marks and Prior dissented). Four votes needed
to overrule the department the order is upheld and the permit denied. Commissioner
Melbostad was absent from the meeting.

Public Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker.

APPEAL NO. 86-210

ILYAS ABSAR, Appellant [Denial on July 28,

) vs. [1986, of permit to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Alter a Building at

CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL [114-116 Clarendon Ave. ■

[REMANDED BY SUPERIOR
[COURT NO. 870-921.

APPEAL NO. 89-122

JOE LING JUNG, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

vs. [May 23, 1989, to Peter

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [and Mary Fung, permit

[to Alter a Building at

[1449 Leavenworth Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8907747.

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (7/17)

APPEAL NO. V89-132

LEONARD GAGE, Appellant l_Denial on June 12, 1989,

vs. [of Rear Yard Variance

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [Sought for property

[located at 610 Oak Street.

[VARIANCE CASE NO. 89.036V.

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (8/2)

APPEAL NO. 89-139

FRANK YEE, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

5] vs. [June 20, 1989, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Lino D'Silva, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Alter a Building

[at 1914 Clement Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 88158115.

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (8/8)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, SEPTEMBER 13, 1989 PAGE TWO

APPEAL NO. 89-146

SHIRLEY MARTINEZ, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[June 6, 1989, to
[Martin Ryan, permit to
[Erect a Structure
[at 474 Joost Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8602097
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY

(8/19)

Items 8A through 8C shall be heard together.

APPEAL NO. 89-183

THE NEW BAYVIEW COMMITTEE,

Appellant
vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[July 28, 1989, to General
[Brewing Company, permit
[to Demolish a Building
[at 2601 Newhall Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8904272.
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY,

(9/23)

APPEAL NO. 89-184

THE NEW BAYVIEW COMMITTEE,

Appellant
vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[July 28, 1989, to General
[Brewing Company, permit
[to Demolish a Building
[at 2601 Newhall Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8904273.
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY.

(9/23)

APPEAL NO. 89-185

THE NEW BAYVIEW COMMITTEE,

Appellant
vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[July 28, 1989, to General
[Brewing Company, permit
[to Demolish a Building
[at 2601 Newhall Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8904274.
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY,

(9/23)

GREATER WEST PORTAL NEIGHBORHOOD
ASSOCIATION, Appellant

APPEAL NO. 89-007

ORKS, Respondent
NG APPROVAL

TO C^C ff C/uUA,

[Protesting
[January/ 4
[Barry
[Demol
[14

issuance
1989,

8718138

(3/1)

BLACKSTONE COURT ASSOCIATION,
0, vs. Appellant

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 89-174

[Protesting issuance on
[July 17, 1989, to George
[Bovone and Al Giannini,
[permit to Erect a Structure
[at 1555 Lombard Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8800816.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(9/10)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, SEPTEMBER 13, 1989 PAGE THREE

APPEAL NO. 89-175

LOIS MITCHELL & MARY NICHOLS,
L) vs. Appellant

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[July 21, 1989, to
[Lloyd Lindbeck, permit
[to Alter a Building at
[at 5-7 Castro Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8815137
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(9/11)

APPEAL NO. 89-192

ANZAVISTA CIVIC & IMPROVEMENT CLUB,

vs. Appellant
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[August 3, 1989, to
[Kaiser Permanete Medical
[Center, permit to
[Demolish a Building at
[2140 O'Farrell Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8907934.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(9/27)

APPEAL NO. V89-176

LARRY COFFEY, Appellant
) vs.

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent

[Protesting issuance on
[July 25, 1989, of Rear
[Yard and Usable Open
[Space Variances Sought, .
[for property located at
[22 Aladdin Terrace.
[VARIANCE CASE NO. 88.787V.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(9/13)

I) Public Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each person

nnnDLKQ ur mc dubku ur rtKnn HrrLMLa

ESTHER Y. MARKS PRESIDENT

VICTOR G. MAKRAS VICE PRESIDENT

RALPH D. HOUSE COMMISSIONER

PAUL H. MELBOSTAD COMMISSIONER

BEVERLY J. PRIOR COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: In the case of ap-
peal of denials, revocations and suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken shall
speak first and shall be allowed seven (7) minutes for thier presentation and
three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

In cases of multiple appeals of the same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7) min-
utes to present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal and shall
speak consecutively, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for roal arguments and, for each appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(415) 554-6720 San Francisco, California 94102

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Room 154-A City Hal!

San Francisco, CA 94102

CITY>fBRARIAN
Public Library

f MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 1989
5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL DOCUMENTS DEKc

ypu

SAN jFRANCJi*wO

) MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE:

REQUESTS FOR JURISDICTION BEYOND THE FIFTEEN-DAY APPEAL PERIOD:

ITEM A: Letter from Philip Li requesting the Board take jurisdiction over penalty
assessed by Bureau of Building Inspection June 12, 1989, for work done at 2511-16th
Avenue.

Penalty assessed June 12, 1989

Appeal period ended June 27, 1989

Request for jurisdiction received September 6, 1989

ITEM B: Letter from Grant Tower III, Esq., requesting the Board to take jurisdiction
over permit issued for structural addition at 1050 Chestnut Street.

Permit issued February 14, 1989

Appeal period ended March 1, 1989

Request for jurisdiction received September 7, 1989

REQUEST FOR REHEARING:

ttfm r- iPtter from Thomas Steel, Esq. on behalf of Mandy Tubbs, requesting rehearing
iriSeal lo 89 -153. Hearing Augu'st 30, 1989. The appellant had protested the
suspension of %k^e Establishment permit at 461 Bush Street Upon motion of
S oner -House the Board voted 3-2 to uphold the Department's order (President
^^LJ^^i\^MhosM dissented). The Department's order of suspension

was upheld.
I) Public Cororcnt: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker.

APPEAL NO. 88-255

ii ^n"Denial on September 16,

BINGW. CH0Y, Appellant L^a ^ ^^ ^

vs* ~ TAlter a Building at

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent rzn- 7th Avenue.

CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL [APPLICATION NO. 8615315.

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (11/

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, SEPTEMBER 20, 1989 PAGE TWO

WILLIAM A. SOMMERS, Appellant
I) vs.

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent

APPEAL NO. 89-187

[Protesting issuance on
[August 3, 1989, to
[Gary L. Wakefield, permit
[to Operate a Second Hand
[Dealer-Auto Accessories
[Business located at
[928 Toland Street.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(9/26)

APPEAL NO. 89-189

YEN B. MILLER, Appellant
>) vs.

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent

"[Denial on August 3, 1989,
[of a Masseuse Trainee
[Permit at 585 Eddy Street,
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(9/26)

APPEAL NO. 89-181

LINDA CLARK, Appellant
i) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Appealing for Refund
[of Penalty Imposed
[on August 8, 1989,
[for work done at
[244 Missouri Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8903365.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(9/190

APPEAL NO. 89-186

TIM LEEFELDT, Appellant
') vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Appealing for Refund
[of Penalty Imposed
[on August 17, 1989,
[for work done at
[760 Clayton Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8912554
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(9/26:

APPEAL NO. 89-188

ANTONIOS KOUTSAKIS, Appellant
*) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL

[Denial on August 11,
[1989, of permit to
[Alter a Building at
[2204 Bryant Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8906162
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(9/26

APPEAL NO. V89-182

KIN LAM & KAM/HIK YEE, Appel^nts
0 /vs.

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent

•p

(9/23

.0) Public Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker.

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD UF PERMIT APPEALS

ESTHER Y. MARKS PRESIDENT

VICTOR G. MAKRAS VICE PRESIDENT

RALPH D. HOUSE COMMISSIONER

PAUL H. MELBOSTAD COMMISSIONER

BEVERLY J. PRIOR COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: In the case of ap-
peal of denials, revocations and suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken shall
speak first and shall be allowed seven (7) minutes for thier presentation and
three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

In cases of multiple appeals of the same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7) min-
utes to present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal and shall
speak consecutively, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for roal arguments and, for each appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(415) 554-6720 San Francisco, California 94102

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Room 154-A City Hall

San Francisco, CA 94162

'iRARIAN
.iorary

}P MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS documents dept.

1*U* WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER i\. 1989

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL URUc ' '"»**-

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE:

REQUESTS FOR JURISDICTION BEYOND THE FIFTEEN DAY APPEAL PERIOD:

ITEM A: Letter from Grant Tower III, Esq., requesting the Board to take jurisdiction
over permit issued for structural addition at 1050 Chestnut Street.

Permit issued March 14, 1989

Appeal period ended March 1, 1989

Request for jurisdiction received September 7, 1989

This matter was continued from the meeting of September 20, 1989. Purpose of

continuance was: (1) To ascertain if deck was built according to Code and (2) To

establish that the notification of the permit issuance was sent to the proper
address.

ITEM B: Letter from Gilbert Eisenberg, Esq., on behalf of Suwatana Barnby requesting
the Board take jurisdiction over denial of Masseuse Trainee permit.

Permit denied July 21, 1989

Appeal period ended August 7, 1989

Request for jurisdiction received September 18, 1989

ITEM C: Letter from Jimmie Smith and Alice Broom on behalf of Mrs. Maggie Dow
requesting Board to take jurisdiction over permit issued for new construction at
1457 Quesada Street.

Permit issued June 22, 1989

Appeal period ended July 7, 1989

Request for jurisdiction received September 15, 1989

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING:

ITEM D: Letter from Alice Suet Yee Barkley, Esq., requesting rehearing of Appeal
No. 89-174. The appellant, the Blackstone Court Association, had protested the
issuance of permit to erect a structure at 1555 Lombard Street. Meeting
September 13, 1989. Upon motion of Vice President Makras, the Board voted 5-0 to
overrule the Department and deny the permit.

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, OCTOBER i\, 1989 PAGE TWO

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING: (Continued)

ITEM E: Letter from Margaret A. Verges requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 89-192.
Hearing September 13, 1989. The appellant had protested the issuance to Kaiser
Permanente Medical Center, permit to demolish a building at 2140 O'Farrell Street.
Upon motion of Commissioner House, the Board voted 5-0 to uphold the Department
and grant the permit.

ITEM F: Letter from Jeff L. Strobel , Esq., on behalf of Shirley Martinez requesting
rehearing of Appeal No. 89-146. Hearing September 13, 1989. Appellant had protested
the issuance of permit to erect a structure at 474 Joost Avenue. Upon motion of
Commissioner Prior, the Board voted 5-0 to uphold the Department on condition that
the revised plans submitted at the September 13, 1989, hearing be substituted for
the original plans.

ITEM G: Letter from David E. Russo, Esq., on behalf of Mr. and Mrs. Fung requesting
rehearing of Appeal No. 89-122. Hearing September 13, 1989. The Fungs had been
issued a permit to alter a building at 1449 Leavenworth Street. Upon motion of
Commissioner Prior, the Board 4-1 to overrule the Department and deny the permit.
President Marks dissented.

Public Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker.

APPEAL NO. 89-150

HANG. T. TRAN, Appellant

vs.
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent

"[Denial on July 6, 1989,
[of Masseuse Permit at
[1172 Sutter Street.
[FOR REHEARING TODAY.

(8/20)

APPEAL NO. 89-197

JOHN C. LAKE, Appellant

vs.
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent

[Revocation on August 31,
[1989, of permit to
[operate Taxi Cab.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(10/15;

APPEAL NO. 89-193

PETER LEWANDOWSKI, Appellant

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Imposition of Penalty
[on August 21, 1989,
[for work done at
[3865-3867 - 21st Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8901943
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(9/30)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, OCTOBER 4, 1989 PAGE THREE

APPEAL NO. 89-194

MAN HOY LIU, Appellant [Appealing for Refund

vs. [of Penalty imposed

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [on August 8, 1989,

[for work done at

[182 Precita Avenue.

[APPLICATION NO. 8909713.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/30)

APPEAL NO. 89-195

TED JOHNSON, Appellant [Appealing for Refund

vs. [of Penalty imposed

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [on August 18, 1989,

[for work done at

[3773 Market Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8912207.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (10/2)

APPEAL NO. 89-196

EDGAR GOMEZ, Appellant [Imposition of Penalty

vs. [on August 28, 1989,

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [for work done at

[1076-1078 Capp Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8912619.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (10/9)

APPEAL NO. 89-200

JULIE YANG LEE, Appellant [Imposition of Penalty

vs. [on September 8, 1989,

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [for work done at

[1030 Irving Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8907443.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (10/18

APPEAL NO. 89-190

VIVIAN T. GOODWIN, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

) vs. [August 3, 1989, to

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, [Ernest J. McNabb, of

Respondent [Coastal Dev. permit to

[Erect a Structure at
[801 - 47th Avenue for a
[3-unit residential bldg.
[COASTAL DEV. APPLICATION
[NO. 89.258P.
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/26)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, OCTOBER 4, 1989 PAGE FOUR

APPEAL NO. 89-191

TOM PANELLI, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

1) vs. [August 3, 1989, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Just Desserts, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Alter a Building at

[3735 Buchanan Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8900320.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/27)

APPEAL NO. 89-198

ANDY & KRIS WISKES, Appellants [Protesting issuance on

!) vs. [August 18, 1989, to Anna

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [and Bruce Meyer, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Erect a Structure at

[21 Wright Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8903103.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (10/15

APPEAL NO. V89-160

ROBERT TIBBITS, Appellant [Denial on July 6, 1989,

I) vs. [of Off-Street Parking,

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [Rear Yard and Exposure

[of a Dwelling Unit
[Variances sought for
[property located at
[386-388 Chestnut Street.
[VARIANCE CASE NO. 89.096V.
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (8/26)

APPEAL NO. V89-199

ROBERT L. MC CURN, Appellant [Denial on August 25, 1989,

) vs. [of Rear Yard, Usable Open

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [Space and Exposure of a

[Dwelling Unit Variances
[Sought, for property located
[at 1111 Plymouth Avenue.
[VARIANCE CASE NO. 89.088V.
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (10/15;

) Public Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker,

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

ESTHER Y. MARKS PRESIDENT

VICTOR G. MAKRAS VICE PRESIDENT

RALPH D. HOUSE COMMISSIONER

PAUL H. MELBOSTAD COMMISSIONER

BEVERLY J. PRIOR COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: In the case of ap-
peal of denials, revocations and suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken shall
speak first and shall be allowed seven (7) minutes for thier presentation and
three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

In cases of multiple appeals of the same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7) min-
utes to present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal and shall
speak consecutively, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for roal arguments and, for each appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(415) 554-6720 San Francisco, California 94102

CipK.IBRARIAN
JDlic LiDrary

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

P ar\ DOCUMENTS DEPT

J WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1989 -T'

i 9 oct i o ms

t % 5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL

''"/SI '-"BL'C URDAPV

•«*•**

MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE:

ADOPTION OF FINDINGS OF FACT:

ITEM A: APPEAL NO. 89-192. Hearing September 13, 1989. Upon motion of
Commissioner House, the Board voted 5-0 to uphold the Department and grant the permit
for Kaiser Hospital to demolish a building at 2140 O'Farrell Street.

ITEM B: APPEAL NO. 89-174. Hearing September 13, 1989. Upon motion of Vice

President Makras, the Board voted 5-0 to overrule the Department and deny the permit

to erect a structure at 1555 Lombard Street, in the Blackstone Court Historic

District. The appellant was the Blackstone Court Association.

REQUEST FOR JURISDICTION BEYOND THE FIFTEEN DAY APPEAL PERIOD:

ITEM C: Letter from Jimmie Smith and Alice Broom on behalf of Mrs. Maggie Dow
requesting the Board to take jurisdiction over permit issued for new construction
at 1457 Quesada Street.

Permit issued June 22, 1989

Appeal period ended July 7, 1989

Request for jurisdiction received September 15, 1989

This matter continued from meeting of October 4, 1989, for further consideration.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING:

ITEM D: Letter from Larry Coffey requesting rehearing of Appeal No. V89-176.
Hearing September 13, 1989. Appellant had protested the granting of a variance
for property at 22 Aladdin Terrace. Upon motion of Commissioner House, the Board
voted 2-3 to uphold the Department and grant the variance. (President Marks, Vice
President Makras and Commissioner Melbostad dissented.) Four votes being necessary
to overrule a department, the variance decision is upheld.

ITEM E: Letter from Alice Suet Yee Barkley, Esq., on behalf of the permit holders,
requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 89-174.

ITEM F: Letter from Margaret A. Verges requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 89-192.
Hearing September 13, 1989. The appellant had protested the issuance to Kaiser
Permanente Medical Center, permit to demolish a building at 2140 O'Farrell Street.
Upon motion of Commissioner House, the Board voted 5-0 to uphold the Department
and grant the permit.

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, OCTOBER 11, 1989 PAGE TWO

) Public Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker.

APPEAL NO. V89-132

LEONARD GAGE, Appellant
) vs.

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent

LDenial on June 12, 1989,
[of Rear Yard Variance
[Sought for property
[located at 610 Oak Street,
[VARIANCE CASE NO. 89.036V,
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY,

(3/2)

APPEAL NO. 89-202

GARRY BELENKY, Appellant
) vs.

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent

[Revocation on August 29,
[1989, of Driver Public
[Vehicle permit, dba
[Allied Cab Company at
[1200 Minnesota Street.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(10/21

APPEAL NO. 89-201

NANE SCHLOTTHAUER, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Imposition of Penalty
[on September 7, 1989, .
[for work done at
|_ 1649 Greenwich Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8908920
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(10/18

APPEAL NO. 89-205

HERMAN GALANT, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Imposition of Penalty
[on September 11, 1989,
[for work done at
[35 Castle Manor Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8810122
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(10/24

APPEAL NO. 89-207

MARK CRAIG, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Imposition of Penalty
[on September 20, 1989,
[for work done at
[1316 Page Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8916628
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(10/30

APPEAL NO. 89-206

HAROLD JOW, Appellant
I vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL

[Denial on September 1,
[1989, of permit to
[Erect a Structure
[at 312 - 4th Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8717902
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(10/2*3

MEETING UF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, OCTOBER 11, 1989 PAGE THREE

APPEAL NO. 89-209

NATIVIDAD KORDZIEL, Appellant [Denial on September 22,

9) vs. [1989, of permit to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Alter a Building at

CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL L949 Brussels Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8908909.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/1

APPEAL NO. 89-210

STEPHEN ADAMY, Appellant [Denial on September 27,

10) vs. [1989, of permit to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Alter a Building at

CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL [5420-22 Fulton Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8909496.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/6

APPEAL NO. 89-208

BURTON H. ALBERTS, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

11) vs. L September 8, 1989, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Ron Neuman, permit to

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Erect a Structure at

[70 Edgehill Way.

[APPLICATION NO. 8802128.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (10/3

12) Public Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker,

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

ESTHER Y. MARKS PRESIDENT

VICTOR G. MAKRAS VICE PRESIDENT

RALPH D. HOUSE COMMISSIONER

PAUL H. MELBOSTAD COMMISSIONER

BEVERLY J. PRIOR COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF' THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: In the case of ap-
peal of denials, revocations and suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken shall
speak first and shall be allowed seven (7) minutes for thier presentation and
three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

In cases of multiple appeals of the same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7). min-
utes to present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal and shall
speak consecutively, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for roal arguments and, for each appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(415) 554-6720 -San Francisco, California 94102

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Room 154-A City Hail

San Francisco, CA 94102

PP' LIBRARIAN
Puolic library

P30

!l»2 . MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

p/zs/fci n WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 25, 1989

* %*^ 5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL NOV 2 1 1983

'-•■• FRANCISCO

) MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE:

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING:

ITEM A: Letter from Julie Yang Lee requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 89-200.
Hearing October 4, 1989. The appellant had protested the imposition of penalty
for work done at 1030 Irving Street. Upon motion of Vice President Makras, the
Board voted 5-0 to uphold the department and sustain the penalty. The appellant
did not appear nor was she represented at the hearing.

ITEM B: Letter from Stephen Adamy requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 89-210.
Hearing October 11, 1989. The appellant had requested the denial of permit to alter
a building at 5420-22 Fulton Street. Upon motion of Commissioner Melbostad, the
Board voted 3-1 to overrule the Department. Four votes needed to overrule the
department, the order is upheld and the permit denied. President Marks dissented.
Commissioner Prior was absent.

REQUEST FOR JURISDICTION BEYOND THE FIFTEEN-DAY APPEAL PERIOD:

ITEM C: Letter from Charles A. Slaton requesting Board to take jurisdiction over
permit issued for renovation of property at 61 Moss Street.

Permit issued August 8, 1989

Appeal period ended August 23, 1989

Request for jurisdiction received October 5, 1989

I) Public Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker.

APPEAL NO. 89-124

KAI-MIN JEN & JACK TSENG, [Denial on June 2,

}) vs. Appellants [1989, of permit for a

POLICE DEPARTMENT, [Massage Establishment,

Respondent [dba "Fantasy Massage"

[at 960 Harrison Street,
[FOR REHEARING TODAY.

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, OCTOBER 25, 1989 PAGE TWO

APPEAL NO. V89-132

LEONARD GAGE, Appellant [Denial on June 12, 1989,

4) vs. [of Rear Yard Variance

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [Sought for property

[located at 610 Oak Street.
[VARIANCE CASE NO. 89.036V.
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (8/2)

APPEAL NO. V89-199

ROBERT L. MC CURN, Appellant [Denial on August 25, 1989,

5) vs. [of Rear Yard, Usable Open

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [Space and Exposure of a

[Dwelling Unit Variances
[Sought, for property located
[at 1111 Plymouth Avenue.
[VARIANCE CASE NO. 89.088V.
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (10/15;

APPEAL NO. 89-197

JOHN C. LAKE, Appellant [Revocation on August 31,

6) vs. [1989, of permit to

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent [operate Taxi Cab.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (10/15

APPEAL NO. 89-211

THUY-PHUONG THI DOAN, Appellant [Denial on September 20,

7) vs. [1989, of permit to

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent [operate as a masseuse at

[at 1020 Geary Street.
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/8)

APPEAL NO. 89-216

EVAN WHITE, Appellant [Imposition of Penalty

8) vs. [on September 26, 1989,

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [for work done at

[873-75-77 Vallejo Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8914652.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/13

APPEAL NO. 89-119

SHAIKH & FATIMA USMAN, Appellants [Denial on June 5,

3) vs. [1989, of permit to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Alter a Building

[at 166 Turk Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8904434.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/15)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, OCTOBER 25, 1989 PAGE THREE

APPEAL NO. 89-217

TOM MC GEE, Appellant
10) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL

"[Denial on September 27,
[1989, of permit to
[Alter a Building at
[3004 Sacramento Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8917233
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(11/13)

APPEAL NO. 89-212

ELIZABETH LIPPITT, Appellant
11) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

"[Protesting issuance on
[September 20, 1989, to
[Mr. /Mrs. Hartati Murdaya,
[permit to Alter a Building
[at 2418 Pacific Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8903977.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(11/8)

Items 12A and 12B shall be heard together.

APPEAL NO. 89-213

T. C. DURKIN, Appellant
12A) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[September 19, 1989, to
[Pennisi Muriel Life
[Estate, permit to
[Alter a Building at
[1771 - 17th Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8810940.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(11/11

APPEAL NO. 89-214

JOHN C. VOLZ & MARTHA S. PATTON,
12B) vs. Appellants

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[September 19, 1989, to
[Pennisi Muriel Life
[Estate, permit to
[Alter a Building at
[1771 - 17th Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8810940
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(11/12

APPEAL NO. 89-215

DONNA B. LEVITT, Appellant
13) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[September 21, 1989, to
[Mile Rock Brewery, permit
[to Alter a Building at
[316 - 11th Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8810940.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(11/12

14) Public Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker.

ESTHER Y. MARKS PRESIDENT

VICTOR 6. MAKRAS VICE PRESIDENT

RALPH D. HOUSE COMMISSIONER

PAUL H. MELBOSTAD COMMISSIONER

BEVERLY J. PRIOR COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: In the case of ap-
peal of denials, revocations and suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken shall
speak first and shall be allowed seven (7) minutes for thier presentation and
three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

In cases of multiple appeals of the same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7) min-
utes to present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal and shall
speak consecutively, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for roal arguments and, for each appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTE'S

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(415) 554-6720 San Francisco, California 94102

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Room 154-A City Hall

San Francisco, CA 94102

IRIAN
Public Library

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 1989

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL

DOCUMENTS DEPT.

ll/i/£<?
() MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE:

REQUEST FOR JURISDICTION BEYOND THE FIFTEEN-DAY APPEAL PERIOD:

ITEM A: Letter from Mr. Chan Tu Loi requesting the Board take jurisdiction over
Health permit application for restaurant at 2228 Irving Street.

Permit issued

Appeal period ended

Request for jurisdiction received

October 6, 1989
October 21, 1989
October 25, 1989

ADOPTION OF FINDINGS OF FACT:

ITEM B: Appeal No. 89-160. Hearing October 4, 1989. Upon motion of Commissioner
Melbostad, the Board voted 5-0 to overrule the Zoning Administrator and grant the
variances subject to a condition.

2) Public Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker.

APPEAL NO. 89-197

JOHN C. LAKE, Appellant
3) vs.

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent

"[Revocation on August 31,
[1989, of Driver Public
[Vehicle permit dba
["Veteran's Cab Company"
[at 1501 Harrison Street.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(10/15

APPEAL NO. 89-211

THUY-PHUONG THI DOAN, Appellant
4) vs.

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent

[Denial on September 20,
[1989, of masseuse permit
[dba "Sophia's Spa" at
[1020 Geary Street.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(11/8)

DOROTHY I. CHAO, Appellant
>) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

APPEAL NO. 89-219

[Appealing for Refund
[of Penalty Imposed
[on October 6, 1989,
[for work done at
[3173 - 21st Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8912832,
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(11/19

NLtllNb Uh IHt bUAKU Uh KtKM I AHHtALS, NUVLMBLK 1, 1989 PAGE TWO

APPEAL WO. 89-223

GREGORY LI, Appellant [Appealing for Refund

3) vs. [of Penalty Imposed

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [on October 11, 1989,

[for work done at
[2841 Sacramento Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8903827. ,

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/22)

APPEAL NO. 89-221

CLYDE STEINER, Appellant [Appealing for Refund

') vs. [of Penalty Imposed

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [on October 16, 1989,

[for work done at

[3355-57-59 - 21st St.

[APPLICATION NO. 8917465.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/22)

APPEAL NO. 89-220

HARLAN HOFFMAN, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

0 vs. [October 6, 1989, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Clyde Steiner, permit "

[to Alter a Building at
[3355-57-59 - 21st St.
[APPLICATION NO. 8917465. ,

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/21'

APPEAL NO. 89-208

BURTON H. ALBERTS, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

ii) vs. [September 8, 1989, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Ron Neuman, permit to

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [Erect a Structure at

[70 Edgehill Way.

[APPLICATION NO. 8802128.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (10/30

APPEAL NO. 89-222

ROSE O'KEEFE & DAVID BIRNBAUM, [Protesting issuance on

0) vs. Appellants [September 28, 1989, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Chik & Susan Wong, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Alter a Building at

[2006 - 30th Avenue.

[APPLICATION NO. 8819259.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/2;

ncciinu ur mc duhfuj ur ri_i\nii nrrcttLo, nuvcnDQix ij jlsoj rrtuL inKCL

APPEAL NO. 89-224

LAMBERT YAM & RUBY YANG, Appellants [Protesting issuance on

11) vs. [October 10, 1989, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Febe Portillo, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Alter a Building

[at 58 Manchester Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8910646.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

APPEAL NO. 89-226

JEFFREY & DARICE O'NEILL, Appellants [Protesting issuance on

12) vs. [October 4, 1989, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Richard Woods, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Alter a Building at

[301 El Camino Del Mar.

[APPLICATION NO. 8911966.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/28

APPEAL NO. 89-228

GEORGE & DOROTHY KWAN, Appellants [Protesting issuance on

13) vs. [October 10, 1989, to Wha

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Gon and Linda Ko, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Alter a Building at

[716 - 26th Avenue.

[APPLICATION NO. 8712554.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/29

APPEAL NO. 89-204

PATTY SHIMEK, Appellant [Order to Cease Violation

14) vs. [of the Planning Code

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [dated August 29, 1989,

[for property located at

[1064-V Oak Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8806973.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (10/23

15) Public Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker.

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

ESTHER Y. MARKS PRESIDENT

VICTOR 6. MAKRAS VICE PRESIDENT

RALPH D. HOUSE COMMISSIONER

PAUL H. MELBOSTAD COMMISSIONER

BEVERLY J. PRIOR COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OFTHE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: In the case of ap-
peal of denials, revocations and suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken shall
speak first and shall be allowed seven (7) minutes for thier presentation and
three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

In cases of multiple appeals of the same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7). min-
utes to present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal arxl shall
speak consecutively, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for roal arguments and, for each appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(415) 554-6720 San Francisco, California 94102

BOARD OF PERMH APPEALS

Public Library

P30

QfauLK*

■ r

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

WEDNESDAY NOVEMBER 15, 1989

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL

DOCUMENTS DEPT.

NOV :: ; ;- ■

N FKANCISCO
pi I irp/v ov

1) MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE:

REQUESTS FOR JURISDICTION BEYOND THE FIFTEEN-DAY APPEAL PERIOD:

ITEM A: Letter from Ricardo Alva requesting the Board to take jurisdiction over
revocation of Bingo permit for the Mission Language and Vocational School located
at 2929-19th Street. The permittee failed to pay the permit fee.

Permit revoked

Appeal period ended

Request for jurisdiction received

October 17, 1989
November 1, 1989
November 3, 1989

ITEM B: Letter from Carol S. Dietrich requesting the Board to take jurisdiction
over permit issued for alterations at 370-372 Lombard Street.

Permit issued

Appeal period ended

Request for jurisdiction received

October 16, 1989
October 31, 1989
November 3, 1989

ADOPTION OF FINDINGS OF FACT:

ITEM C: Appeal No. 89-160. Hearing November 1, 1989. Upon motion of President
Marks, the Board voted 4-1 to overrule the department and grant the permit.
Commissioner Prior dissented.

I) Public Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker,

KAI-MIN JEN & JACK TSENG,
( ) vs. Appellants

POLICE DEPARTMENT,

Respondent

APPEAL NO. 89-124

[Denial on June 2,
[1989, of permit for a
[Massage Establishment,
[dba "Fantasy Massage"
[at 960 Harrison Street,
[FOR REHEARING TODAY.

(7/18)

GARRY BELENKY, Appellant
() vs.

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent

APPEAL NO. 89-202

[Revocation on August 29,
[1989, of Driver Public
[Vehicle permit, dba
[Allied Cab Company at
[1200 Minnesota Street.
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY,

(10/21)

"TING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, NOVEMBER 15, 1989 PAGE TWO

APPEAL NO. 89-218

N ABAD, dba "CHARLIE'S DELI VAN", [Revocation on September 20,

vs. Appellant [1989, of permit to operate

LICE DEPARTMENT, [as a Mobile Caterer at

Respondent [271 Cotter Street, dba

["Charlie's Deli Van".
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/14)

APPEAL NO. 89-139

RANK YEE, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

vs. [June 20, 1989, to

)EPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Lino D'Silva, permit

:iTY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Alter a Building

[at 1914 Clement Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 88158115.
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (8/8)

APPEAL NO. 89-200

JULIE YANG LEE, Appellant [Imposition of Penalty

vs. [on September 8, 1989,

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [for work done at

[1030 Irving Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8907443.

[FOR REHEARING TODAY. (10/18)-

APPEAL NO. 89-210

STEPHEN ADAMY, Appellant [Denial on September 27,

vs. [1989, of permit to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Alter a Building at

CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL [5420-22 Fulton Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8909496.

[FOR REHEARING TODAY. (11/6)

APPEAL NO. 89-226

JEFFREY & DARICE O'NEILL, Appellants [Protesting issuance on

) vs. [October 4, 1989, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Richard Woods, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Alter a Building at

[301 El Camino Del Mar.

[APPLICATION NO. 8911966.

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (11/28$

APPEAL NO. 89-212

ELIZABETH LIPPITT, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

0) vs. [September 20, 1989, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Mr. /Mrs. Hartati Murdaya,

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [permit to Alter a Building

[at 2418 Pacific Avenue.

[APPLICATION NO. 8903977.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/8)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, NOVEMBER 15, 1989 PAGE THREE

APPEAL NO. 89-227

KURT & LILLYANE RIETMANN, Appellants
11) vs.

HEALTH DEPARTMENT, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Appealing condition limiting
[operating hours of a bar/
[restaurant at 4207 Judah St.
[dba "The Reef", imposed on
[October 6, 1989, by City
[Planning on Dept. of Public
[Health permit to Operate
[Food Preparation & Service
[Establishment issued to
[Kurt and Lillyane Rietmann.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(11/28)

APPEAL NO. 89-225

GEORGE F. HAUSER, Appellant
.2) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Appealing for Refund
[of Penalty Imposed
[on October 19, 1989,
[for work done at
[313 Eureka Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8918516
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(11/28|

APPEAL NO. 89-229

AURA MELENDEZ, Appellant
.3) vs

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Appealing for Refund
[of Penalty Imposed
[on October 10, 1989,
[for work done at
[20 Burnside Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8917952
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(12/3)

APPEAL NO. 89-230

ARMINE ELLIS, Appellant
.4) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Appealing for Refund
[of Penalty Imposed
[on October 17, 1989,
[for work done at
[337 Elizabeth Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8905765
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(12/4)

APPEAL NO. 89-231

OSCAR BELISLE, Appellant
'.5) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL

[Denial on October 26,
[1989, of permit to
[Alter a Building at
[1957 - 15th Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8905461
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(12/6)

APPEAL NO. 89-203

ROBERT S. RIVKIN, Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[August 28, 1989, to
[Rudolph Koppl , permit
[to Alter a Building
[at 1770 Broadway St.
[APPLICATION NO. 8910463,
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(10/22)

7) Public Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker,

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

ESTHER Y. MARKS PRESIDENT

VICTOR G. MAKRAS VICE PRESIDENT

RALPH D. HOUSE COMMISSIONER

PAUL H. MELBOSTAD COMMISSIONER

BEVERLY J. PRIOR COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: In the case of ap-
peal of denials, revocations and suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken shall
speak first and shall be allowed seven (7) minutes for thier presentation and
three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

In cases of multiple appeals of the same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7) min-
utes to present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal and shall
speak consecutively, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for roal arguments and, for each appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(415) 554-6720 San Francisco, California 94102

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Room 154-A City Hall
San Francisco, CA 941D2

iRIAN
c Library

P3Q

M^ MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

1%^/Sr^

WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 29, 1989

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL

NOV 2 81 '

(J :r., ,~ < •.. v. ,'VV

) MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE:

REQUESTS FOR JURISDICTION BEYOND THE FIFTEEN-DAY APPEAL PERIOD:

ITEM A: Letter from Peri Drips for the Comic Exchange, 1610 Irving Street,
requesting the Board to take jurisdiction over revocation of Permit for Mechanical
Amusement Devices. The permittee failed to pay annual permit fee.

Permit revoked October 17, 1989

Appeal period ended November 1, 1989

Request for jurisdiction received November 2, 1989

ITEM B: Letter from William G. Jonopulos and Laurine A. Jonopulos requesting the
Board to take jurisdiction over permit issued for horizontal addition at 1233 Green
Street. Application No. 8717914.

Permit issued October 2, 1989

Appeal period ended October 17, 1989

Request for jurisdiction received November 9, 1989

ADOPTION OF FINDINGS OF FACT:

ITEM C: Appeal No. 88-255. Hearing September 20, 1989. Upon motion of Vice
President Makras, the Board voted 4-1 to overrule the department and to grant the
permit with a condition requiring plan revision. President Marks dissented.

() Public Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker,

APPEAL NO. 89-224

LAMBERT YAM & RUBY YANG, Appellants [Protesting issuance on

vs. [October 10, 1989, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Febe Portillo, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Alter a Building

[at 58 Manchester Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8910646.

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY. (11/25)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, NOVEMBER 29, 1989 PAGE TWO

APPEAL NO. 89-232

PHILIP GUNNING, Appellant [Revocation on October 17,

4) vs. [1989, of Dance Hall Keeper

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent [permit at 3565 Geary St.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/5)

Items 5A and 5B shall be heard together.

APPEAL NO. 89-234

JOTE KEJELA, Appellant [Appealing decision of the

5A) vs. [S.F. Police Commission on

POLICE COMMISSION, Respondent [September 20, 1989, to close

[out Police Public Convenience
[& Necessity Hearing on Taxicab
[matters for year 1988.
[Police Comm. Res. # 1266-89.
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/6)

APPEAL NO. 89-235

TSE S. KWAN, Appellant [Appealing decision of the

5B) vs. [S.F. Police Commission on

POLICE COMMISSION, Respondent [September 20, 1989, to close

[out Police Public Convenience
[& Necessity Hearing on Taxicab
[matters for year 1988.
[Police Comm. Res. # 1266-89.
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/10

APPEAL NO. 89-238

JOSEPH T. W00TT0N, Appellant [Revocation on October

6) vs. [17, 1989, of Driver

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent [Public Vehicle Permit.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/11

APPEAL NO. 89-240

IBRAHIM K. ZUGHBABA, Appellant [Suspension on October

1) vs. [26, 1989, of Driver

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent [Public Vehicle permit

[dba "Orange Cab Company"

[at 785 Mangels Avenue.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/13

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, NOVEMBER 29, 1989 PAGE THREE

APPEAL NO. 89-239

TONY LAGORIO, Appellant [Appealing for Refund

*) vs. [of Penalty Imposed

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [on November 1, 1989,

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [for work done at

[318 - 320 Harriet St.

[APPLICATION NO. 8906450.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/14)

APPEAL NO. 89-119

SHAIKH & FATIMA USMAN, Appellants [Denial on June 5,

)) vs. [1989, of permit to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Alter a Building

[at 166 Turk Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8904434.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (7/15)

APPEAL NO. 89-233
PERRY FONG, Appellant [Denial on October 27,

.0) vs. [1989, of permit to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Erect a Structure at

[200 Guttenberg Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8811659.
[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/6)

APPEAL NO. V89-172

HAROLD DOW, Appellant [Denial on July 19, 1989,

.1) vs. [of Rear Yard Variance

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent [Sought for property

[located at 2070 Green St.

[VARIANCE CASE NO. 89.052V.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (9/6)

2) Public Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker.

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

ESTHER Y. MARKS PRESIDENT

VICTOR 6. MAKRAS VICE PRESIDENT

RALPH D. HOUSE COMMISSIONER

PAUL H. MELBOSTAD COMMISSIONER

BEVERLY J. PRIOR COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: In the case of ap-
peal of denials, revocations and suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken shall
speak first and shall be allowed seven (7) minutes for thier presentation and
three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

In the case of protest appeals, the protestor shall -speak first and shall be
allowed seven (7) minutes to present oral argument and three (3) minutes for
rebuttal, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes to present
oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal. The Board may request a
departmental response at its own discretion.

In cases of multiple appeals of the same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7) min-
utes to present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal and shall
speak consecutively, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for roal arguments and, for each appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(415) 554-6720 San Francisco, California 94102

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Room 154-A City Hall

San Francisco, CA 94102

Public Library

Ore

pro

■5»

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 6, 1989 documents dept.

5:00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL DEC 4 1383

U"OI |C I JPDApv

1) MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE:

ADOPTION OF FINDINGS OF FACT:

ITEM A: Appeal No. 89-124. Rehearing November 15, 1989. Upon motion of President
Marks, the Board voted 3-2 to uphold the department and deny the permit. Vice
President Makras and Commissioner House dissented.

!) Public Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker.

ANN ABAD, dba "CHARLIE'S DELI VAN","
i) vs. Appellant

POLICE DEPARTMENT,

Respondent

APPEAL NO. 89-218

[Revocation on September 20,
[1989, of permit to operate
[as a Mobile Caterer at
[271 Cotter Street, dba
["Charlie's Deli Van".
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(11/14)

BENNY LIZARDO, Appellant
) vs.

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent

APPEAL NO. 89-237

[Denial on October 26,
[1989, of Driver Public
[Vehicle permit dba
["Yellow Cab Company"
[at 1200 Mississippi St.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(12/11)

PATTI K. COBB, Appellant
) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 89-241

[Appealing for Refund
[of Penalty imposed
[on November 6, 1989,
[for work done at
[3779 - 25th Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8913499
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(12/15)

APPEAL NO 89-236

)

DALE L. ALLEN, JR., Appellant

vs.
DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent

[Appealing for Refund
[of Penalty Imposed
[on October 31, 1989,
[for work done at
[521 Dewey Boulevard.
[APPLICATION NO. 8904824,
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(12/9)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, DECEMBER 6, 1989 PAGE TWO

APPEAL NO. 89-242

ROGER ALLEN, Appellant [Imposition of Penalty

7) vs. [on November 7, 1989,

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [for work done at

[175 Fair Oaks Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8917173.
" [FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/17)

APPEAL NO. 89-212

ELIZABETH LIPPITT, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

3) vs. [September 20, 1989, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Mr. /Mrs. Hartati Murdaya,

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [permit to Alter a Building

[at 2418 Pacific Avenue.

[APPLICATION NO. 8903977.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (11/8)

APPEAL NO. 89-247

ALAN S. OVSON & SUSAN COLE, [Appeal of Correction

)) vs. Appellants [Notice by the Bureau

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, [of Building Inspection

Respondent [on November 9, 1989,

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [requiring provision of

BUREAU OF BUILDING INSPECTION APPROVAL [7-foot-6-inch ceiling

[height in Tower unit

[at 2819 Pine Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8911383.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/23)

APPEAL NO. 89-244

LUCHA BOTT, Appellant [Denial on October 24,

0) vs. [1989, of permit to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Alter a Building at

CITY PLANNING DISAPPROVAL [2351-53 Pacific Ave.

[APPLICATION NO. 8910799.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/18)

APPEAL NO. 89-245

JAMES CULP, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

1) vs. [October 23, 1989, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Liya Kath, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Alter a Building

[at 1259-61 Folsom St.

[APPLICATION NO. 8902619.

[FOR HEARING TODAY. (12/17)

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, DECEMBER 6, 1989 PAGE THREE

JERRY KLEIN, Appellant
12) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 89-246

[Protesting issuance on
[October 25, 1989, to
[Arthur Zanello, permit
[to Erect a Structure
[at 1100 Eddy Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8819677
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(12/19)

APPEAL NO. 89-248

JOHN & GLORIA AGUILERA, Appellant
13) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[November 3, 1989, to
[McAley and McDonough,
[permit to Demolish a
[Garage Building at
[290 Melrose Avenue.
[APPLICATION NO. 8919373
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

RENE PEINADO, Appellant
4) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

APPEAL NO. 89-249

[Protesting issuance on
[November 1, 1989, to
[Karen Montgomery, permit
[to Alter a Building at
[2154 Sutter Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8811954,
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(12/23)

(12/24)

5) Public Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker,

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

ESTHER Y. MARKS PRESIDENT

VICTOR 6. MAKRAS VICE PRESIDENT

RALPH D. HOUSE COMMISSIONER

PAUL H. MELBOSTAD COMMISSIONER

BEVERLY J. PRIOR COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: In the case of ap-
peal of denials, revocations and suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken shall
speak first and shall be allowed seven (7) minutes for thier presentation and
three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

In cases of multiple appeals of the same departmental action or permit the
appeals shall be joined and the appellants shall each be allowed seven (7) min-
utes to present oral arguments and three (3) minutes each for rebuttal and shall
speak consecutively, and the permit holder shall be allowed seven (7) minutes
for roal arguments and, for each appeal filed, three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room.no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals in the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(415) 554-6720 San Francisco, California 94102

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Room 154-A City Hall

San Francisco, CA 94102

CITY LlbKARIAN
Public Library

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS
WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 13, 1989

5-.00 P.M., ROOM 282, CITY HALL

DOCUMENTS DEP7.

(1) HATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION, REQUESTS FOR REHEARING AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE.

(2) Public Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker,

APPEAL NO. 89-139

FRANK YEE, Appellant
(3) vs.

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
CITY PLANNING APPROVAL

[Protesting issuance on
[June 20, 1989, to
[Lino D'Silva, permit
[to Alter a Building
[at 1914 Clement Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8815815.
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY.

APPEAL NO. 89-243

WILLIAM S. HANSON, Appellant
(4) vs.

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent

"[Denial on October 26, 1989,
[of Massage Establishment
[permit a I 1172 Sutter Street
[dba "Nikki's Oriental Massage"
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

APPEAL NO. 89-251

RAKESH SEHGAL, Appellant
(5) vs.

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent

[Revocation on November 13,
[1989, of Driver Public
[Vehicle permit at 1200
[Minnesota Street, dba
["United Cab Company".
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

APPEAL NO. 89-255

PERRY BOUSSINA, Appellant
(6) vs.

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent

[Revocation on November 14,
[1989, of Dance Hall Keeper/
[Place of Entertaiment permit
[at 3231 Fillmore Street.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

HA THI MANN, Appellant
(7) vs.

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent

APPEAL NO. 89-257

[Revocation on November 14,
[1989, of Masseuse permit
[at 931 Kearny Street, dba
["Thailand Health Spa".
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS, DECEMBER 13, 1989 PAGE TWO

APPEAL WO. 89-252

ROLANDO VICENTE, Appellant [Appealing for Refund

(8) vs. [of Penalty Imposed

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [on November 16, 1989,

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [for work done at

[107 Santa Rosa Ave.

[APPLICATION NO. 8817139.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

APPEAL NO. 89-245

JAMES CULP, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

(9) vs. [October 23, 1989, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Liya Kath, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Alter a Building

[at 1259-61 Folsom St.

[APPLICATION NO. 8902619.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

APPEAL NO. 89-250

NEIGHBORS OF THE EXCELSIOR, Appellants [Protesting issuance on

(10) vs. [November 3, 1989, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Louis Stalcar, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Erect a Structure

[at 632 Persia Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8810927
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

APPEAL NO. 89-258

ARTHUR R. CRESSEY, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

(11) vs. [November 16, 1989, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [William O'Brien, permit

CITY PLANNING APPROVAL [to Demolish a Building

[at 200 Taraval Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 8915316
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

APPEAL NO. 89-259

CAROL S. DIETRICH, Appellant [Protesting issuance on

(12) vs. [October 16, 1989, to

DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent [Earl Dennis, permit to

[Alter a Building at

[370-372 Lombard Street.

[APPLICATION NO. 8912396.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

APPEAL NO. V89-254

STOUFFER HOTEL COMPANY, [Protesting issuance on

(13) vs. Appellant [November 14, 1989, to
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, [Steven Weir, of Rear

Respondent [Yard Variance sought

[for property located
[at 897 California St.
[VARIANCE CASE NO. 88.761V.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(14) Public Comment: Presentation shall be limited to three (3) minutes for each speaker,

ESTHER Y. MARKS PRESIDENT

VICTOR 6. MAKRAS VICE PRESIDENT

RALPH D. HOUSE COMMISSIONER

PAUL H. MELBOSTAD COMMISSIONER

BEVERLY J. PRIOR COMMISSIONER

DORIS LEVINE - OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER - 456-9899

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL CALL A RECESS WHENEVER
NECESSARY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE HEARING REPORTER.

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS RULES, ARTICLE 1, SECTION 5

The order of presentation of an appeal shall be as follows: In the case of ap-
peal of denials, revocations and suspensions the representatives of the depart-
ment, board, commission or person from whose order the appeal is taken shall
speak first and shall be allowed seven (7) minutes for thier presentation and
three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

The appellant whose permit has been denied, revoked or suspended shall be al-
lowed seven (7) minutes for oral argument and three (3) minutes for rebuttal.

Other persons desiring to speak before the Board on an appeal may speak once
for up to three (3) minutes.

The Board shall consider the departmental letter deemed as read, and such must
be received by the Board no later than two days prior to the appointed hearing.

SPECIAL NOTES

Pursuant to the Board's Rules any written evidence or arguments in writing must
be received by opposing parties and departments as well as by the Board not later
than five days before the hearing.

Mailed notice of public hearings on appeals are sent to all parties at least five
days prior to the date of hearing. In the event that a matter is continued to a
specific date by the presiding officer and announced to the parties in the hear-
ing room, no additional mailed notice will be sent. Please call the Board office
at 554-6720 for scheduling or other information during regular business hours.

The complete Rules of the Board are available for review at the Board office.

REQUESTS FOR REHEARING

Written requests for rehearing must be filed within ten days from the date of a
decision and may be filed only by principals In the appeal. See Article 5, Sec-
tion 6 for complete rule on rehearings.

City and County of San Francisco
Robert H. Feldman BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Executive Director Room 154-A, City Hall

(415) 554-6720 San Francisco, California 94102

BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS

Room 154-A Citv Hall

San f rancisco, CA 84102

Public Library

Internet Archive Audio

Featured

Top

Images

Featured

Top

Software

Featured

Top

Books

Featured

Top

Video

Featured

Top

Mobile Apps

Browser Extensions

Archive-It Subscription

Save Page Now

Full text of "[Agenda]"

See other formats