Skip to main content

Full text of "A history of the Christian Church, tr. by C.E. Blumenthal and C.P. Wing"

See other formats 


Google 


This  is  a  digital  copy  of  a  book  that  was  preserved  for  generations  on  library  shelves  before  it  was  carefully  scanned  by  Google  as  part  of  a  project 

to  make  the  world's  books  discoverable  online. 

It  has  survived  long  enough  for  the  copyright  to  expire  and  the  book  to  enter  the  public  domain.  A  public  domain  book  is  one  that  was  never  subject 

to  copyright  or  whose  legal  copyright  term  has  expired.  Whether  a  book  is  in  the  public  domain  may  vary  country  to  country.  Public  domain  books 

are  our  gateways  to  the  past,  representing  a  wealth  of  history,  culture  and  knowledge  that's  often  difficult  to  discover. 

Marks,  notations  and  other  maiginalia  present  in  the  original  volume  will  appear  in  this  file  -  a  reminder  of  this  book's  long  journey  from  the 

publisher  to  a  library  and  finally  to  you. 

Usage  guidelines 

Google  is  proud  to  partner  with  libraries  to  digitize  public  domain  materials  and  make  them  widely  accessible.  Public  domain  books  belong  to  the 
public  and  we  are  merely  their  custodians.  Nevertheless,  this  work  is  expensive,  so  in  order  to  keep  providing  tliis  resource,  we  liave  taken  steps  to 
prevent  abuse  by  commercial  parties,  including  placing  technical  restrictions  on  automated  querying. 
We  also  ask  that  you: 

+  Make  non-commercial  use  of  the  files  We  designed  Google  Book  Search  for  use  by  individuals,  and  we  request  that  you  use  these  files  for 
personal,  non-commercial  purposes. 

+  Refrain  fivm  automated  querying  Do  not  send  automated  queries  of  any  sort  to  Google's  system:  If  you  are  conducting  research  on  machine 
translation,  optical  character  recognition  or  other  areas  where  access  to  a  large  amount  of  text  is  helpful,  please  contact  us.  We  encourage  the 
use  of  public  domain  materials  for  these  purposes  and  may  be  able  to  help. 

+  Maintain  attributionTht  GoogXt  "watermark"  you  see  on  each  file  is  essential  for  in  forming  people  about  this  project  and  helping  them  find 
additional  materials  through  Google  Book  Search.  Please  do  not  remove  it. 

+  Keep  it  legal  Whatever  your  use,  remember  that  you  are  responsible  for  ensuring  that  what  you  are  doing  is  legal.  Do  not  assume  that  just 
because  we  believe  a  book  is  in  the  public  domain  for  users  in  the  United  States,  that  the  work  is  also  in  the  public  domain  for  users  in  other 
countries.  Whether  a  book  is  still  in  copyright  varies  from  country  to  country,  and  we  can't  offer  guidance  on  whether  any  specific  use  of 
any  specific  book  is  allowed.  Please  do  not  assume  that  a  book's  appearance  in  Google  Book  Search  means  it  can  be  used  in  any  manner 
anywhere  in  the  world.  Copyright  infringement  liabili^  can  be  quite  severe. 

About  Google  Book  Search 

Google's  mission  is  to  organize  the  world's  information  and  to  make  it  universally  accessible  and  useful.   Google  Book  Search  helps  readers 
discover  the  world's  books  while  helping  authors  and  publishers  reach  new  audiences.  You  can  search  through  the  full  text  of  this  book  on  the  web 

at|http: //books  .google  .com/I 


600100558P 


rx 


HISTORY 


OT  THE 


CHRISTIAN   CHURCH. 


BT 

Db.  CHARLES  HASE, 

PBOFE880B  OF  THEOLOOT  IX  THE  X.*Niy2BSITT  OF  JENA. 


Sranslatt^  ftm  t\t  Stbtnt^  an))  muc^  m:^tak)i  (&ttmti,  ^Wmif 


BY 


CHAKLES  E.  BLUMENTHAL, 

FBOFEBSOR  OF  HEBREW   AND  OF  MODERN  L.\NGUAG£S  IX  DIOUNBON  OOLLEOB, 


AND 


CONWAY  P.  WING, 

TJUUCm  09  IRE  mn  PltESBTmiAS  CHUSCH  IX  fiAatiar.Bj  tESHgnTML. 


LONDON: 
TRUBNER  &  CO.,    12  PATERNOSTER  ROW. 

1855. 


//^,   /.   JcT. 


ENTBUED  AT  STATIONXBa'  HALI. 


TRANSLATOR'S  PREFACE. 


-»♦♦■ 


This  translation  was  undertaken  because  its  authors  knew  of  no 
work  in  English  which  precisely  corresponded  with  it.  The  his- 
tories of  Milner,  Waddington,  Milman,  Stebbing,  Hardwicke 
and  Robertson,  and  the  translations  of  Mosheim,  Neander,  Dol- 
linger,  Thiersch  and  Schaff,  have  severally  specific  merits  with 
reference  to  the  objects  of  their  composition  ;  but  many  of  them 
Rie  incomplete  as  general  histories,  most  of  them  were  written 
so  as  to  give  undue  prominence  to  some  single  aspect  of  the 
characters  and  events  of  which  they  treat,  and  all  of  them  are  too 
large  to  be  used  either  as  manuals  for  the  scholar,  as  text-books 
for  the  instructor,  or  as  compendiums  for  the  general  reader. 
8ume  attempts  to  supply  the  deficiency  by  Palmer,  Timpson, 
Foulkes,  Hinds,  Goodrich  and  Ruter,  have  met  with  no  very 
general  acceptance.  A  miniature  representation  of  a  vast  mass 
(►f  facts,  in  which  each  personage  and  event  shall  appear  in  their 
individual  freshness  and  relative  proportions,  requires  for  its  exe- 
cution peculiar  talents  and  rare  opportunities.  The  Grermans 
appear  to  possess  these  in  a  greater  degree  than  any  other  people. 
Their  learned  men  highly  appreciate  the  value  of  such  manuals, 
and  their  literature  abounds  in  them.  One  of  these,  by  Dr. 
Gieseler,  has  been  translated,  and  is  almost  invaluable.  But  its 
text  is  a  mere  epitome  of  results,  and  bears  no  proportion  to  the 
vast  materials  in  the  notes  ;  and  the  narrative  awakens  no  in- 
terest.    It  would  be  diflScult  to  find  a  graphic  picture,  or  an  ex- 


iv  translator's  prbface. 

pression  of  feeling  in  the  whole  work.  Even  the  posthumous 
volume  which  has  been  promised,  will  leave  the  history  incomplete. 
The  delay  which  has  taken  place  in  the  appearance  of  this 
work  has  aflforded  many  opportunities  of  learning  how  much  this 
deficiency  was  appreciated  by  competent  scholars  in  England  and 
America.  From  the  letters  we  have  received,  and  from  public 
journals,  we  might  present  many  testimonies,  not  only  that  such 
a  work  was  needed,  but  that  nothing  in  the  literature  of  the 
present  day  was  so  likely  to  supply  the  deficiency  as  a  transla- 
tion of  the  work  we  had  announced.  The  style  of  our  author  is 
especially  adapted  to  the  Anglo-Saxon  mind ;  his  astonishing 
power  of  condensed  expression, — his  aesthetic,  if  not  religious  sym- 
pathies, with  every  variety  of  intellectual  and  moral  greatness, — 
his  skilful  daguerreotypes  of  characters  by  means  of  the  trans- 
mitted light  of  contemporary  language, — the  delicate  irony  and 
genial  humor  which  pervade  his  descriptions, — the  picturesque 
liveliness  with  which  a  single  character  or  incident  brings  out 
the  manners  and  spirit  of  an  age, — the  precision  with  which 
his  scientific  arrangement  is  preserved,  the  critical  judgment 
with  which  the  minutest  results  of  recent  investigations  are  in- 
.  troduced, — and  the  graceful  proportion  and  animation  with  which 
the  whole  stands  out  before  us,  render  his  history  attractive  to 
all  kinds  of  readers.  He  throws  away  every  name  or  event  which 
has  no  historical  utility  or  organic  life  ;  he  appreciates  an  heroic 
spirit  wherever  it  appears,  and  each  period  is  estimated  as  nearly 
as  possible  in  its  own  light.  His  is  not  merely  a  history  of  the 
hierarchy,  of  the  nobility,  or  of  great  men,  but  of  the  Church, 
His  descriptions,  therefore,  embrace  especially  traits  of  common 
life,  the  progress  of  the  arts,  and  indications  of  advancement  in 
social  freedom.  If  liis  theological  opinions  do  not  quite  coincide 
with  our  own,  he  seldom,  at  least  in  this  work,  obtrudes  theui 
upon  our  attehtion.  His  object  seems  to  have  been  to  maintain 
historical  accuracy,  rather  than  to  exhibit  his  own  opinions  ;  and 
if  sometimes  our  favorite  characters,  or  views,  do  not  appear  in 
the  light  in  which  we  have  usually  contemplated  them,  his  uni- 
form impartiality  and  intelligence  make  us  suspect  our  earlier 
judgments.  None  but  those  who  observe  the  stmcture  rather 
than  the  particular  dogmatic  expressions  of  this  work,  will  be 


tranblator's  preface.  V 

likely  to  detect  the  antbor^s  peculiar  views,  and  such  readers  can 
afford  to  give  them  whatever  consideration  they  deserve.  A  strik- 
ing comparison  has  been  drawn  between  him  and  a  living  English 
historian  and  essayist,  but  the  reference  can  be  only  to  the  live- 
liness and  brilliancy  of  his  historical  scenes,  and  not  to  the  mi- 
nute space  in  which  the  picture  of  more  than  eighteen  centuries 
is  presented. 

As  soon  as  we  had  determined  to  translate  the  work,  the 
author  was  informed  of  our  intention,  and  we  publish  his  reply 
to  our  communication.  Unforeseen  difiSculties,  however,  delayed 
the  publication  of  our  work,  and  when  more  than  a  hundred 
pages  had  been  stereotyped,  we  received  a  copy  of  the  seventh 
edition,  with  numerous  corrections  and  additions.  We  have  cer- 
tainly no  reason  to  regret  such  an  occurrence,  although  it  im- 
posed on  us  the  necessity  of  recalling  and  rewriting  a  large 
portion  of  our  manuscript.  We  submitted,  however,  with  cheer- 
fulness to  the  necessity,  since  we  are  now  able  to  present  an 
edition  in  which  some  errors  have  been  corrected,  the  results  of 
recent  research,  especially  with  respect  to  the  second  and  third 
centuries,  have  been  incorporated,  and  the  eventful  history  of  the 
last  seven  years  has  been  added.  In  an  Appendix,  we  present  • 
every  thing  of  importance  added  by  the  author  in  the  part  which 
had  been  already  struck  off.  But  as  we  were  obliged  in  this  first 
part  to  retain  the  numbers  of  the  sections  used  in  the  sixth 
edition,  and  subsequently  to  adopt  those  used  in  the  seventh, 
some  confusion  has  necessarily  been  created.  Should  a  new 
edition  be  called  for,  we  hope  not  only  to  remove  this  defect,  but 
to  adapt  the  work  to  an  American  position.  The  section  on 
America  (§  462)  has  been  already,  with  the  author's  concur- 
rence, rewritten  and  enlarged.  Considerable  pains  have  also 
been  taken  to  adapt  the  references  and  authorities  to  the  present 
state  of  English  literature,  and  some  references  to  German  trans- 
lations of  English  and  French  works  have  been  omitted,  but 
every  addition  is  indicated  by  brackets.  We  are  well  aware  that 
our  work  has  many  faults  after  all  our  revisions  and  efforts  to 
correct  them,  but,  like  the  author,  we  see  no  end  to  the  labor 
which  might  be  bestowed  on  that  which  is,  by  its  nature,  neces- 
sarily imperfect.     Dr.  Hase  has  given  a  large  part  of  his  atten- 


vi  translator's  preface. 

tion  to  the  original  history  for  more  than  twenty  years.  He  was 
bora  in  the  year  1800  at  Steinbach.  In  1823,  he  was  a  private 
instructor  in  Theology  at  Tubingen  ;  in  1829,  he  was  elected  a 
Professor  of  Philosophy  in  Leipsic ;  and  in  1830,  he  became  a 
Professor  of  Theology  in  Jena,  where  he  still  continues.  His 
other  works  are  :  The  Old  Pastor's  Testament,  Tub.  1824  ;  The 
Murder  of  Justice,  a  Vow  of  the  Church,  Lps.  1826  ;  A  Manual 
of  Evang.  Dogmatik,  Lps.  1826,  4th  and  much  enlarged  edit., 
Lps.  1850 ;  Gnosis,  Lps.  1827-29,  3  vols.  ;  Hutterus  Kedivivus, 
or  Dogmatik  of  the  Evang.  Luth.  Church,  Lps.  1829,  7  ed.  in 
1848  (a  work  whose  purely  historical  account  involved  him  in 
a  controversy  with  Kohr,  the  great  champion  of  Kationalism, 
and  led  to  a  series  of  polemical  works  on  that  subject)  ;  The 
Life  of  Christ,  Lps.  1829,  4th  imp.  edit.  1854  ;  Libri  Symbolici 
Ecclesiae  Evangelicae  sive  Concordia,  of  which  the  3d  ed.  ap- 
peared in  Lps.  1846  ;  The  Two  Archbishops,  (referring  to  the 
difficulties  in  the  dioceses  of  Cologne  and  Posen,)  Lps.  1839 ; 
The  Good  Old  Law  of  the  Church,  two  academical  discourses, 
2d  ed.  Lps.  1847  ;  The  Evang.  Prot.  Church  of  the  German 
Empire,  on  Ecclesiastical  Law,  2d  ed.  Lps.  1852  ;  The  Modern 
Prophets,  three  Lectures  on  the  Maid  of  Orleans,  Savonarola, 
and  the  Kingdom  of  the  Anabaptists,  Lps.  1851.  He  has  also 
recently  been  engaged  in  the  publication  of  Didot's  new  edition 
of  Stephanus'  Thesaurus  Grecae  Linguae,  of  which  the  seventh 
part  has  just  appeared. 


AUTHOR'S  LETTER  TO  THE  TRANSLATORS. 


To  Prof.  C.  E.  Blumenthcd  and  Rev,  C.  P.  Wing  :— 

Dear  Sirs  : — Between  him  who  incorporates  in  a  book  the  results 
of  his  most  serious  and  profound  mental  labors,  and  those  who  from  a 
cordial  preference  endeavor  to  introduce  and  interpret  it  to  a  foreign 
nation,  must  naturally  spring  up  such  an  intimate  intellectual  sympathy, 
tnat  it  would  seem  surprising  for  them,  if  contemporaries,  to  remain 
strangers  to  each  other.  I,  therefore,  hail  with  grateful  feelings  the 
kind  letter  you  haye  sent  me  across  the  ocean,  and  in  imagination  grasp 
the  hand  of  fraternal  fellowship  extended  to  me  from  the  land  of 
WiUiam  Penn. 

You  have  doubtless  already  discovered  that  no  ordinary  obstacles 
were  to  be  surmounted  before  a  good  translation  of  my  Church  History 
could  be  made,  as  my  object  was  to  compress  the  most  perfect  picture 
of  the  religious  life  developed  in  the  Church  into  the  smallest  frame ; 
and  hence  I  was  compelled  to  be  very  parsimonious  in  the  use  of  words, 
and  to  refer  to  the  original  authorities  for  many  things  plain  to  the 
learned,  but  obscure  to  the  learner.  A  French  translation,  once  at- 
tempted, split  upon  this  rook.  I  hope,  however,  that  in  a  sister  lan- 
guage, so  essentially  Germanic  as  the  English,  these  difficulties  may  be 
more  easily  overcome,  and  such  a  confidence  is  encouraged  by  the  fact, 
that  in  a  Danish  translation  they  have  been  completely  vanquished. 

If  I  remember  correctly,  an  attempt  to  translate  my  work  was  onoe 
made  in  England,  but  was  abandoned  on  account  of  its  supposed  incon- 
sistency with  the  views  of  the  Established  Church.  You  have  doubtless 
considered  how  far  this  objection  should  prevail  with  reference  to  the 
Church  of  your  country,  if  the  numerous  and  varied  communities  Which 
have  pitched  their  tents  under  the  banner  of  the  stars  and  stripes  may 


J 


viii  author's  letter  to  the  translators. 

be  truly  spoken  of  as  a  single  Cbupch.  I  trust,  however,  that  among 
those  who  study  history  from  a  higher  position  than  that  of  a  party,  an 
assimilation  of  yiews  will  gradually  prevail  respecting  the  silent  opin- 
ions and  facts  which  lie  behind  us  in  the  past.  I  have  at  least  honestly 
aimed  to  recognize  in  its  proper  light  every  element  in  any  way  drawn 
around  our  common  Lord.  I  have  thus  endeavored  to  approach  as 
nearly  as  possible  that  exalted  position  from  which  the  history  of  his 
Church  will  be  regarded  by  Christ  himself,  not  merely  as  the  Judge  of 
quick  and  dead,  but  as  the  faithful  Shepherd  seeking  the  lost  lamb. 

May  my  poor  book,  therefore,  be  dressed  once  more  in  a  language 
spoken  on  every  ocean  and  coast,  and  so  come  back  to  me  from  a  world 
to  which,  as  to  another  holy  land,  hosts  of  peaceful  crusaders  are  an- 
nually pouring  to  plant  anew  their  hopes,  and  to  realize  their  long- 
cherished  ideals  in  subsequent  generations.  The  brief  notice  of  the 
Church  in  the  United  States  you  propose  to  substitute  for  my  section 
on  that  subject,  will  doubtless  better  adapt  the  work  to  your  country. 
Whenever  the  universal  interest  of  the  Church  was  the  topic,  I  have 
myself  given  more  space  to  the  Church  of  my  fathers.  I  have  no 
doubt  that  the  alliance  commenced  between  German  and  American  the- 
ology will  prove  a  blessing  to  both.  Both  nations  have  certainly  a 
great  mission  assigned  them  in  ecclesiastical  history,  which  each  must 
accomplish  in  its  own  peculiar  manner. 

The  sixth  edition  made  its  appearance  just  before  the  storm  which 
has  since  broken  over  central  Europe.  Pius  IX.,  haviDg  been  driven 
from  his  beautiful  Babylon  by  an  insurrection  which  he  could  not  allay 
by  kindness,  has  been  restored  by  republican  France,  to  substitute  a 
government  of  priests  and  Jesuits  for  a  Roman  Republic.  The  French 
clergy  have  also  hastily  concluded  to  send  up  the  petition  "  Domine, 
salvam  fao  rempublicam,"  as  long  as  a  democratic  republic  can  be  main- 
tained in  France.  In  Germany,  our  national  Assembly  at  Frankfort 
not  only  proclaimed  the  gospel  of  liberty  for  the  Church,  and  the  fun- 
damental rights  of  the  German  nation,  but  going  beyond  the  people 
whom  they  professed  to  regard  as  their  model,  they  threatened  to  di- 
vest the  state  of  all  Christian  or  religious  character.  The  more  con- 
siderate of  our  nation  sent  forth  their  warnings  against  such  a  rupture 
with  all  historical  traditions,  and  painful  political  events  have  since 
shown  that  the  immediate  object  of  the  Protestant  German  Church 
should  be  much  more  cautious  and  consonant  with  the  national  spirit 
This  object  unquestionably  is,  to  give  to  the  Church  the  administration 
of  its  own  affairs,  in  alliance  with  a  state  under  which  the  right  of 
citisenship  shall  depend  upon  no  creed,  and  the  gospel  of  Christ  shall 
h^  proclaimed  as  the  highest  principle  of  right 


author's  letter  to  the  translators.  ix 

In  the  Catholic  Church,  the  independence  of  the  state  secured  to 
the  hierarchy  by  the  revolution,  was  made  subservient  to  such  an  enor- 
mous increase  of  its  powers,  that  the  freedom  of  the  inferior  clergy  and 
of  the  congregations  is  seriously  endangered.  What  was  called  Ger- 
man Catholicism,  has  shown,  as  the  more  sagacious  perceived  from  the 
commencement,  that  it  lacked  the  religious  energy  necessary  to  effect  a 
reform  in  the  Christian  Church.  Since  it  has  ceased  to  be  harassed  by 
political  obstructions  it  has  dwindled  into  an  insignificant  sect.  But  in 
the  contest  between  a  merely  prescriptive  Christianity,  and  the  pro- 
gressive spirit  of  modem  improvement,  many  a  severe  conflict  must 
doubtless  yet  take  place,  before  Christ  in  this  respect  also  will  manifest 
himself  as  the  Mediator. 

Karl  Hasb. 

Jkna,  May  7^  1850. 


PREFACE  TO  THE  FIRST  EDITION. 


In  oomposing  the  following  work,  my  intention  was  to  present  a  text- 
book  to  the  public,  and  to  accomplish  this,  I  resolved  to  devote  to  it  all 
the  severe  labor  and  concentration  of  effort  which  such  an  object  requires. 
But  I  was  aware  that  however  the  general  outline  might  be  condensed,  the 
living  freshness  which  we  find  in  the  original  monuments  and  documents 
of  each  historical  period,  should  be  preserved  unimpaired.  Instead, 
therefore,  of  endeavoring,  like  most  of  those  who  have  prepared  such 
works,  to  present  only  that  which  is  general  aud  indefinite,  I  have  con- 
tinuallj  aimed  to  hold  up  that  which  in  each  age  possessed  most  of  in- 
dividual and  distinct  character :  and  when  it  became  indispensable  that 
some  general  grand  features  ^ould  be  rendered  prominent,  I  have 
sought  to  make  these  so  suggestive  of  the  particular  facts,  that  recollec- 
tions of  the  most  minute  circumstances  should  throng  the  mind  of  the 
instructor.  In  this  way,  the  attention  will  be  aroused  while  in  the  pro- 
cess of  preparation,  and  the  memory  will  be  strengthened  in  its  recollec- 
tions, since  whatever  is  characteristic  awakens  sympathy,  and  fastens 
itself  in  the  memory.  In  this  respect,  it  may  be  said  that  what  belongs 
to  a  good  text-book,  is  also  an  essential  part  of  every  historical  repre- 
sentation. In  every  century  many  noble  spirits  have  found  their  prin- 
cipal delight,  and  expended  all  their  energies,  in  investigating  subjects 
connected  with  ecclesiastical  history.  And  yet  for  a  long  time  the  com- 
position of  ecclesiastical  history  seems  by  no  means  to  have  retained  the 
eminent  relative  position  which  it  held  in  former  days.  Without  refer- 
ring to  historians  of  an  earlier  period,  where  have  we  any  works  upon 
Church  History  whose  excellence  as  historical  compositions  can  be  com- 
pared with  those  ,pf  Maohiavel,  Hume,  and  John  Mailer  ?  Even 
among  the  most  recent  ecclesiastical  histories,  that  df  Spittler  is  the 
only  work  which  can  stand  the  test  of  a  critical  examination  by  the  con- 
temporary literary  world ;  but  its  Christian  character  is  so  obviously 
one-sided,  that  every  one  perceives  that  in  this  respect  it  is  far  inferior 


PREFACE  TO   THE  FIRST  EDITION.  Zl 

to  ihat  of  Neander.  In  thus  expressiDg  my  general  design,  my  Object 
u  to  show  what  has  been  my  aim,  however  far  I  have  oome  short  of  at- 
taining it  In  these  remarks,  however,  I  have  had  very  little  reference 
to  the  mere  literary  style  ;  for,  with  respect  to  this,  we  in  Germany 
generally  need,  and  actually  receive,  much  allowance  for  the  dry  form 
of  a  compendium.  I  rather  refer  to  such  a  careful  study  of  original 
authorities  that  the  objects  and  events  assume  the  living  freshness  of 
reality,  and  to  a  complete  intellectual  apprehension  of  the  facts.  I  have 
also  bestowed  some  attention  upon  a  peculiar  department  of  history, 
which,  though  it  has  in  former  times  been  noticed  by  all  genuine  eoole* 
siastical  historians,  never  became  prominent  until  the  appearance  of  the 
venerable  Neander's  History  of  the  Christian  Religion^  I  do  not,  how- 
ever, by  any  means  expect  that  my  present  work  will  receive  very  de- 
cided favor  from  those  who,  in  a  peculiar  sense,  belong  to  the  school  of 
Neander,  since  it  was  certainly  not  so  much  my  special  object  to  search 
out  what  was  spiritual  and  devotional  among  the  people,  as  it  was  al- 
ways to  seize  upon  what  was  characteristic  of  the  popular  religioiL  In 
the  greatness  and  completeness  of  such  a  representation,  there  must  of 
course  always  be  much  adapted  to  inspire  devotional  feelings,  and,  ac- 
cordingly, I  have  constantly  felt  that  I  was  writing  the  history  of  the 
actual  kingdom  of  G-od  on  earth.  But  as  men  have  often  turned 
that  which  was  really  sublime  into  a  caricature,  many  individual  points 
must  necessarily  be  far  enough  from  edifying. 

There  are  some  subjects  not  usually  introduced  into  an  ecclesiastical 
history,  to  which  I  have  awarded  a  right  to  a  position  there,  because 
they  had  their  origin  in  the  Church.  Indeed,  in  most  of  the  larger 
Church  Histories,  nearly  all  of  them  have  had  a  certain  kind  of  con- 
sideration already  bestowed  upon  them.  Such  is,  e.  g.,  the  treatment 
which  Schroeckh  has  given  to  the  subject  of  Christian  art,  although  the 
style  in  which  he  has  written  must  be  confessed  to  have  been  singularly 
awkward.  In  his  Encyclopedia,  Rosenkranz  has  also  assigned  a  due 
degree  of  importance  to  the  subject  of  ecclesiastical  architecture.  On 
the  other  hand,  I  have  omitted  many  things  ordinarily  mentioned  even 
in  the  smallest  eompendiums.  I  have,  however,  so  little  disposition  to 
offer  an  apology  for  this,  that  I  am  rather  inclined  to  reproach  myself 
that,  especially  on  the  subject  of  Patristies,  I  so  far  yielded  to  usage 
that  I  allowed  many  topics  to  retain  their  ordinary  position,  which 
certainly  have  no  right  to  a  place  in  history.  On  various  occasions  it 
has  recently  been  asserted  that  ecclesiastical  history  ought,  at  least  in 
a  course  of  academical  instruction,  to  throw  out  a  portion  of  its  ballast 
And  yet  we  can  hardly  think  that  a  proper  remedy  for  our  difficulties 
would  be  £6und  in  the  plan  proposed  by  Tittmann,  according  to  which 


mi  PBEFACS   TO   THE   FIRST   EDITION. 

our  future  histories  must  be  confined  to  an  account  of  the  promulgation 
of  Christianity,  and  of  the  internal  constitution  of  the  Church.  For,  it 
most  readily  be  perceived,  that  no  true  representation  of  the  actual 
oondition  of  the  Church  could  ever  be  made  by  one  who  confined  him- 
self to  such  arbitrary  restrictions.  If,  indeed,  an  ecclesiastical  history 
should  attempt  merely  to  present  a  connected  account  of  all  theological 
literature,  it  would  go  beyond  its  peculiar  province,  and  become  an  en- 
oyclopedia  of  theological  knowledge.  No  particular  event  connected 
with  theological  science  ever  needs  to  be  noticed,  except  when  it  becomes 
important  as  a  prominent  circumstance  belonging  to  the  age,  and  may 
properly  be  regarded  as  characteristic  of  the  times.  We  cannot,  how- 
ever, entirely  dispense  with  some  account  of  the  received  doctrines  of 
the  Church.  Although  a  separate  history  of  these  is  of  the  highest  im- 
portance to  the  interests  of  theological  science,  the  ecclesiastical  his- 
torian cannot  on  that  account  omit  all  reference  to  the  subject ;  for  how 
ooold  the  ecclesiastical  movements  of  the  fourth,  fifth  and  sixth  centuries 
be  adequately  described  without  noticing  the  various  forms  and  processes 
through  which  the  doctrinal  views  of  the  Church,  and  its  different  sects, 
then  passed,  and  by  which  the  character  of  those  great  movements  was 
determined  ?  Indeed,  how  could  a  clear  representation  be  given  of  any 
period  of  the  Church,  unless  it  included  some  account  of  the  system  of 
faith  which  animates  and  sustains  the  whole.  There  is,  in  reality,  only 
a  formal  distinction  between  the  history  of  doctrines  as  a  special  science, 
and  as  an  element  in  the  general  hbtory  of  the  Church ;  for,  aside  from 
the  difference  in  the  outward  extent  with  which  the  subject  is  necessarily 
treated,  they  only  refer  to  the  different  poles  of  the  same  axis, — the 
former  presenting  the  doctrine  rather  as  an  idea  unfolding  its  own  self, 
and  the  latter  exhibiting  it  in  its  relation  to  surrounding  events.  But 
the  principal  method  by  which  ecclesiastical  history  was  to  be  simplified, 
was  by  discarding  a  mass  of  useless  material  Nothing  is  a  part  of 
history  which  has  not  at  some  period  possessed  actual  life,  and  con- 
sequently become  immortal,  by  exhibiting  in  itself  a  true  refraction  of 
the  Christian  spirit ;  for,  as  God  is  only  the  God  of  the  living,  so  history  , 
is  not  a  record  of  that  which  is  lifeless  and  dead,  but  of  that  which  has 
a  perpetual  life.  We  have,  however,  hitherto  dragged  along  a  vast 
multitude  of  these  still-born  trifles.  Of  what  benefit  can  it  be,  at  least 
for  students,  to  have  it  in  their  power  to  repeat  the  names  of  all  those 
persons  who  have  been  only  remotely  connected  with  the  different  events 
mentioned  in  history ,^-of  Synods  which  decided  upon  nothiog,  of  popes  • 
who  never  governed,  and  of  authors  who  wrote  nothing  of  importance. 
A  veneration  for  the  names  of  these  silent  personages,  of  whom  nothiug 
is  recorded  but  the  year  of  their  death,  has  induced  many  even  of  our 


PBBFACE   TO   THE   FIRST   EDITION.  XIU 

greatest  ecclesiastical  historians  to  fill  whole  pages  of  their  works  with 
the  useless  catalogue.  Should  any  one  think  that  it  is  the  business  of 
the  instructor  to  quicken  these  dry  bones  by  giving  an  account  of  their 
works,  he  certainly  has  very  little  idea  of  the  range  of  topics  embraced 
in  the  academic  lecture ;  and  I  appeal  to  the  experience  of  any  one  who 
has  ever  gone  through  with  the  text-book  of  Staudlin  or  of  Muenscher, 
and  inquire  whether  he  has  found  it  possible  to  animate  the  masses 
found  in  them;  or  if  he  has  been  successful  in  this,  whether  he  has 
found  any  advantages  worth  the  trouble?  I  have  endeavored,  as  far  as 
possible,  to  avoid  such  useless  verbiage  in  the  text,  for,  although  a  man- 
ual should  be  expected  to  require  much  explanation  from  the  living 
teacher,  it  should  also  possess  some  character  of  its  own.  By  adopting 
this  plan,  opportunity  has  been  acquired  for  a  more  extensive  notice  of 
those  matters  which  were  really  important,  and  it  will  sometimes  be 
found  that  I  have  given  to  spch  topics  as  much  space  as  they  ordinarily 
receive  in  larger  works.  It  is  possible,  indeed,  that  a  degree  of  dispro- 
portion may  be  discovered  between  the  attention  bestowed  upon  different 
individual  subjects ;  but  it  was  never  intended  that  the  most  diffuse  por- 
tions should  take  the  place  of  the  oral  lecture,  but  rather  excite  the 
reader  to  examine  more  thoroughly  into  the  minutest  particulars.  The 
principle  on  which  this  has  been  done  may  be  found  expressed  in  the 
third  section  of  the  work.  The  academic  instruction  will  at  least  assist 
the  student  in  gaining  a  complete  view  of  an  age,  if  it  only  presents  that 
age  most  thoroughly  in  the  lives  of  its  individual  men ;  and  it  is  pre- 
cisely by  such  a  concrete  representation  of  exalted  particular  agents 
that  the  most  distinct  impression  is  produced  upon  the  memory. 
Shakspeare  says,  in  one  of  his  prologues,  *'  I  pray  you,  Iook  upon  the 
broil  of  a  few  players  as  if  it  were  a  real  battle  1 ''  In  like  manner,  the 
historian  may  request  his  readers  to  regard  the  intellectual  chiefs  and 
representatives  of  a  particular  period  as  the  age  itself.  Such  a  course 
is  not  one  which  I  have  myself  originally  discovered,  but  it  is  the 
necessary  result  of  the  multiplication  of  those  admirable  biographies  of 
which  Neander  has  given  us  such  eminent  specimens,  and  to  the  compo- 
sition of  which  his  example  has  so  much  contributed. 

The  reader  will  sometimes  meet  with  very  peculiar  expressions,  such 
as  no  one  would  reasonably  have  expected  from  my  own  pen.  The  ex- 
perienced reader  of  history  will  readily  perceive  that  these  are  quotations 
vfhich  I  have  taken  as  a  kind  of  catch-words  from  the  original  authori- 
ties. I  might  frequently  have  designated  them  as  such  by  some  mark, 
but  they  are  generally  so  interwoven  and  imperceptibly  blended  with 
my  own  words,  that  if  I  had  attempted  to  distinguish  the  words  of  other 


Xiy  PBEFAC£   TO   THE   FIBST   EDITION. 

authors  from  my  own,  my  history  would  have  had  almost  the  aspect  of 
mosaic  work. 

Although  I  have  never  concealed  mj  own  opinions,  I  have  generally 
preferred  to  let  the  facts  of  the  narrative  speak  for  themselves.  I  was 
also  far  more  anxious  to  show  why  any  particular  event  came  to  pass, 
and  how  it  was  regarded  when  it  took  place,  than  to  indulge  in  those 
pedantic  reflections,  in  which  men  every  where  atteiifpt  to  act  as  judges. 
And  yet  even  with  respect  to  secular  matters,  I  have  never  shrunk  from 
calling  every  thing  by  its  right  name.  In  the  very  darkest  times,  those 
who  occupied  positions  purely  ecclesiastical,  were  allowed  freely  to  call 
that  unchristian  which  was  really  so.  But  probably  most  persons  will 
think  that  when  judging  of  things  inconsistent  with  true  religion,  I  have 
used  the  full  liberty  which  naturally  belongs  to  my  position  and  my 
character  more  frequently  on  the  side  of  leniency  than  of  severity.  I 
have  no  doubt,  however,  that  in  both  i;pspects  I  have  given  ample 
grounds  for  offence  to  those  who  apply  to  other  ages  the  standard  of  intelli- 
gence and  improvement  to  which  their  own  has  attained,  or  who  judge 
them  by  the  contracted  rules  of  piety  which  they  have  adopted;  in 
whose  eyes  Catharine  of  Siena  was  merely  '^  a  silly  kind  of  woman,''  and 
Julius  II.  '^  il  novum  monstrum ; "  and  who  say  of  Cardinal  Hildebrand, 
that,  '^  the  scoundrel  even  pretended  to  work  miracles ; "  or  who,  on  the 
other  side,  relate  that  the  word  of  the  cross  was  ecclesiastically  abolished 
in  Weimar  in  the  year  1833.  But  judicious  men  will  not  fail  to  recog- 
nise the  same  disposition  in  all  the  apparent  changes  of  opinion  which 
have  taken  place.  They  can  regard  the  same  words  as  seasonable,  and 
indicative  of  an  exalted  mind,  when  used  by  Gregory  YII.,  which  are 
nothing  but  the  helpless  lamentations  of  a  feeble  old  age  when  they  ap- 
pear in  a  Bull  of  Gregory  XYI.  With  regard  to  the  bright  side  of  the 
mediaeval  hierarchy,  and  the  dark  side  of  the  Reformation,  I  do  not 
suppose  I  need,  in  a  purely  theological  circle  of  readers,  to  guard  against 
misconstructions  with  a  solicitude  like  that  which  Van  Raumer  recently 
exhibited,  when  writing  for  the  more  general  body  of  the  people.  I 
might,  indeed,  allege  that  the  Reformation  was  so  pure,  and  so  exalted 
in  its  nature,  that  it  needs  no  concealment  of  its  darker  passages ;  but 
even  if  this  were  untrue,  I  should  nevertheless  withhold  nothing  from 
the  light.  Something  may  be  exacted  from  those  for  whom  the  present 
work  is  intended ;  for,  though  they  may  be  young,  they  should  be  trained 
to  take  independent  and  comprehensive  views  of  history.  I  have,  there- 
fore, in  every  instance  expressed  the  whole  truth  so  far  as  I  have  myself 
known  it.  The  only  sections  in  which  I  have  allowed  any  restrictions 
were  those  which  contain  notices  of  doctrinal  history.  Among  students 
with  whom  I  am  acquainted,  it  is  always  a  rule  to  attend  lectures  upon 


PREFACE   TO  THE  FIRST  EDITION.  XV 

Eoolesiastioal  History  before  those  upon  Didactic  Theology ;  and  it  ap- 
pears to  me  right  that  this  should  always  be  the  case.  I  have^  there- 
fore, in  some  instances  sacrificed  something  of  the  profundity  of  a 
scientific  inyestigation,  that  I  might  address  myself  more  intelligibly  to 
the  popular  mind. 

I  have  also  taken  some  liberty  in  the  general  arrangement.  No  one 
oonyersant  with  the  subject  would  require  thatr  each  historical  period 
should  be  accommodated  to  the  same  immutable  framework.  Who 
would  think  of  bringing  the  apostolic  Church  into  the  same  frame  which 
has  been  found  so  appropriate  to  the  age  of  the  Reformation  ?  And  if 
«  some  exceptions  must  be  conceded  by  those  who  are  most  zealous  in  be- 
half of  an  invariable  system,  we  shall  not  hesitate  to  abandon  this  phan- 
tom of  uniform  periods,  Neither  have  I  thought  it  necessary  when  no 
change  had  taken  place  in  some  particular  state  of  affairs,  in  all  instances 
to  announce  in  a  formal  manner,  that  such  was  the  fact,  or  to  introduce 
the  most  unimportant  details  as  I  should  have  felt  obliged  to  do,  if  I 
had  had  just  so  many  spaces  to  fill  in  each  period.  If  an  event  appears  not 
to  have  possessed  much  influence  until  a  period  after  that  in  which  it 
had  its  commencement,  it  will  be  mentioned  only  in  thai  in  which  it  be- 
came fully  developed.  In  all  cases,  I  have  recognized  no  other  law  than 
that  which  requires  that  each  age  should  be  so  presented  that  the  clear- 
est view  of  it  may  be  obtained,  and  most  firmly  fixed  in  the  memory. 
In  some  instances,  especially  in  modem  history,  I  was  doubtful  what 
arrangement  would  be  best  adapted  to  my  purpose.  In  such  cases,  my 
final  decision  was  determined  by  a  very  slight  preponderance  of  reasons 
in  its  favor,  and  I  shall  not,  therefore,  be  surprised  if  others  should  come 
to  a  different  conclusion.  If,  however,  they  actually  consider  all  the  ad- 
vantages and  results  of  each  method,  they  will  at  least  appreciate  the 
motives  by  which  I  was  directed  in  my  selection. 

A  selected  literature  is  the  only  thing,  in  itself  of  no  importance, 
which  is  yet  essential  to  a  text-book.  Where  it  has  been  possible,  I 
have  distinguished  between  original  authorities  and  revised  editions. 
I  have  referred  to  particular  passages  at  the  bottom  of  the  page,  not 
often  as  proof-passages,  but  merely  as  significant  and  distinct  expres- 
sions of  the  age  in  which  they  were  written,  and  to  be  communicated 
verbally  by  the  lecturer  himself.  The  small  number  of  them  will  cer- 
tainly not  be  imputed  .to  my  indolence  by  those  who  are  aware  how 
easily  such  citations  are  now  to  be  obtained,  and  how  trifling  an  evidence 
they  are  of  genuine  study.  They  will  be  found  most  abundant  in  the 
present  work  with  reference  to  recent  times  (though  without  regard  to 
the  views  of  the  contemporary  writers),  because  it  was  then  more  diffi- 
cult to  refer  to  general  original  authorities,  or  to  revised  editions  of  them. 


XYl  PREFACE  TO  THE   THIBD   EDITION. 

It  is,  indeed,  possible,  that  if  I  had  waited  ten  years  longer,  I  could 
have  established  some  of  my  positions  with  more  circumspection.  But 
if  I  had  done  so,  I  might  at  that  time  have  had  neither  the  opportunity 
nor  the  inclination  to  write  such  a  work  as  is  needed  for  a  text-book ; 
and  as  I  shall  be  just  as  able  then  to  make  any  improvements  within  my 
power  upon  the  present  work,  I  hope  my  friends  will  kindly  accept 
what  I  now  have  to  present  them,  although  from  the  nature  of  such  a 
work  the  writer  is  likely  to  console  himself  at  its  close  with  the  hope 
that  he  will  at  some  future  day  be  able  to  improve  and  perfect  it. 

JxNA,  Jicension  Day^  188i. 


PREFACE  TO  THE  SECOND  EDITION. 

This  Church  History  has  been  every  where  so  kindly  appreciated  and 
noticed,  that  I  have  nothing  but  my  thanks  to  offer,  as  I  present  to  the 
public  another  edition.  With  regard  to  the  division  into  periods,  and 
some  minor  details,  I  have  recently  had  occasion  to  explain  my  views 
to  a  considerable  extent  in  the  second  number  of  my  polemic  treatises. 

Jena,  March  9th,  1886. 


PREFACE  TO  THE  THIRD  EDITION. 

I  CERTAINLY  havo  reasou  to  rejoice  in  the  reception  with  which  this 
book  has  been  favored,  as  it  ha^  been  circulated  far  beyond  the  sphere 
for  which  it  was  originally  intended.  Such  a  result  is  especially  pleas- 
ing, as  it  indicates  that  the  interest  recently  awakened  in  ecclesiastical 
and  kindred  subjects  is  not  confined  to  matters  pertaining  exclusively 
to  the  present  generation,  but  that  men  are  anxious  to  become  thoroughly 
acquainted  with  the  condition  of  things  in  earlier  times,  and  to  become 
animated  by  the  rich  life  of  the  Church  during  its  whole  past  existence. 
But  while  this  is  true,  literature  itself  certainly  gains  but  little  by  this 
rapid  succession  of  new  editions,  and  it  has  really  been  a  source  of  vex- 
ation to  me  that  I  was  obliged  to  allow  so  fine  an  opportunity  to  pass 
without  contributing  more  to  the  perfection  of  this  work.  The  improve- 
ments introduced  have  generally  been  in  matters  of  no  great  importance, 
and  even  where  some  considerable  changes  have  been  made,  they  have 
not  been  the  result  of  any  comprehensive  investigations  of  my  own,  but 


PREFACE   TO   THE   THIBD   EDITION.  XVU 

rather  of  the  labors  of  others.  Thus,  the  section  which  relates  to 
Sayonarola  has  received  some  accession  to  its  materials  from  the  re- 
searches pnrsned  for  a  while  in  Florence,  by  my  former  beloved  col- 
league Meier^  and  the  history  of  the  Popes  since  the  Reformation  has 
gained  something  from  the  ingenious  examinations  and  careful  extracts 
from  original  documents  lately  made  by  Ranke,  Although  the  brevity 
of  a  text-book  has  not  allowed  frequent  references  to  the  German 
Mythology  of  Grimm,  this  work  has  afforded  me  much  valuable  assist- 
ance when  attempting  to  gain  a  complete  view  of  the  history  of  the 
Germanic  Church. 

Prof.  Krabbe,  in  the  Literary  Advertiser  (1837.  N.  10-12.),  besides 
giving  a  detail  of  individual  facts,  which  is  instructive  to  any  one,  and 
is  especially  worthy  of  my  particular  thanks,  ha^  passed  a  judgment 
upon  the  spirit  of  my  book,  by  comparing  it  with  Neander's  Church 
History  as  a  standard.  In  this  respect,  we  Germans  are  a  very  strange 
people.  If  any  one  has  succeeded  in  accomplishing  any  thing  excellent 
in  his  own  peculiar  way,  we  always  think  that  if  another  attempts  any 
thing  in  the  same  department,  he  must  set  about  it  in  precisely  the 
same  style.  But  the  very  fact  that  this  particular  kind  of  historical 
writing  has  had  for  its  representative  and  cultivator  one  so  eminently 
endowed  as  Neander  confessedly  is,  renders  it  comparatively  needless 
that  others  should  enter  the  same  field,  and  unlikely  that  any  should 
^ual  him.  We  can  only  hope  that  he  may  have  health  sufficient,  and 
life  long  enough,  to  complete  his  great  work.  If,  however,  it  is  thought 
that  a  text-book  in  his  style  is  desirable.  Dr.  Guerike  has  certainly 
made  the  most  diligent  use  of  his  pages,  and  should  it  bo  objected  that 
Guerike's  orthodoxy  is  extreme,  Neander  himself  has  trained  up  a  num- 
ber of  clever  pupils,  of  whom  more  than  one  is  competent  to  write  a 
text-book.  I  have  received  in  my  own  way  much  advantage  from 
Neander,  but  my  original  constitution  is  so  different  from  his,  and  my 
mind  has  passed  through  a  process  of  development  so  very  different, 
that  I  should  have  gained  but  little,  whatever  efforts  I  had  made  to 
imitate  him.  No  one  should  expect  to  gather  grapes  of  thorns,  though 
possibly  roses  might  be  found  upon  them. 

The  judgment  of  the  Hegelian  school  has  been  expressed  in  a  review 
by  Prof.  Hasse,  in  the  Annual  Register  of  Scientific  Criticism 
(1836.  N.  66-68.).  The  liberal  spirit  of  true  science,  and  the  friendly 
disposition  of  the  writer,  cannot  be  mistaken  in  the  piece,  in  spite  of 
the  severe  terms  in  which  that  judgment  is  expressed.  He  has,  how- 
ever, done  me  some  injustice  when  he  asserts  that  I  attempted  in  my 
remarks  respecting  general  and  indefinite  expressions  in  my  first  preface, 
to  escape  from  the  universal  principles  of  philosophical  thought.     I 


J 


XVm  PREFACE   TO   THE   THIRD   EDITION. 

only  intended  there  to  speak  against  thpse  indefinite  phrases  which  are 
so  common  in  our  ordinary  text-books,  as,  e,  g.,  the  very  example  which 
I  then  adduced,  where  whole  pages  are  filled  with  names  distinguished 
only  by  a  cross  and  a  date,  which  give  to  them  the  appearance  of  a 
Moravian  cemetery,  rather  than  of  an  abundant  and  varied  individual 
life.     Against  the  objection  that  I  indulged  too  much  in  the  description 
of  minute  details,  which  might  be  urged  more  correctly  against  historical 
representations,  I  will  not  reply  that  it  certainly  requires  more  labor 
to  collect  such  minor  particulars  from  the  original  authorities  than  it 
does  to  make  general  reflections  upon  the  events,  for  I  am  well  aware 
that  my  worthy  opponent  would  contend  for  the  former  as  a  part  of  his 
own  plan,  and  that  he  really  would  require  such  an  earnest  investigation 
of  facts,  as  cannot  be  performed  without  a  severe  exercise  of  thought. 
But  this  earnest  inquiry  into  the  origin  and  nature  of  things,  I  have  in 
no  instance  avoided.     With  regard  to  the  general  principles  contained 
in  the  facts  of  history ^  it  will  be  found  that  the  summaries  prefixed  to 
the  periods  contain  nothing  else,  and  that  the  subsequent  details  of 
particular  and  distinct  events  may  really  be  regarded  as  a  more  ex- 
.tended  illustration  of  them.     But  his  account  of  my  method  of  procedure 
in  this  matter  is  not  altogether  correct.     He  says;  '^The  author,  e,  g,y 
instead  of  giving  us  the  true  origin  of  monasticism,  presents  us  with  a 
description  of  St  Anthony;  and  even  of  him,  we  have  merely  a  series 
of  peculiar  traits  of  character  expressed  in  the  most  pithy  style.''    And 
yet  just  before  the  section  alluded  to,  a  complete  general  view  of  the 
origin  and  spirit  of  that  whole  theory  of  religious  life  out  of  which 
necessarily  proceeded  a  style  of  living,  of  which  that  of  the  anchorets 
was  an  extreme  form,  had  been  presented  (now  ^  64.),  and  in  the  next 
period,  when  that  which  properly  may  be  called  the  monastic  life  came 
before  us,  a  similar  general  representation  of  the  true  object  and  spirit 
of  this  style  of  life  is  given  (now  ^  134.).     The  reviewer  proceeds: 
''  We  are  then  presented  in  a  similar  style  with  a  portraiture  of  Cyprian 
(now  ^  84.),  as  the  representative  of  the  whole  ecclesiastical  life  of  his 
age,  and  a  characteristic  incident  in  the  life  of  Leo  the  Great  is  given 
as  a  specimen  of  the  mode  in  which  the  Roman  bishops  drew  into  their 
own  hands  the  administration  of  the  government  of  the  whole  Church  " 
But  in  the  first  instance  here  mentioned,  the  account  of  Cyprian  was 
preceded  by  a  history  of  the  process  by  which  the  legal  relations  of  the 
Church  had  been  formed,  and  by  some  notice  of  the  general  character- 
istics of  the  ecclesiastical  life ;  and  in  the  other  case,  all  the  antecedent 
principles  had  already  been  mentioned  by  means  of  which  the  Roman 
see  had  gained  a  consciousness  of  its  future  destiny.     Cyprian  and  Leo 
are  described  to  a  greater  extent  than  others,  because  they  were  re- 


PREFACE   TO  THE  THIBD   EDITION.  XIX 

garded  as  the  natural  representatives  of  this  peculiar  phase  of  the  eccle- 
siastical life.  Mj  ohject  was  in  this  way  to  bring  the  abstract  principles 
which  I  had  laid  down  into  a  concrete  representation  by  means  of  these 
important  individual  characters,  inasmuch  as  I  had  certainly  supposed 
this  to  be  the  proper  method  in  which  history  should  be  written.  I 
suppose  I  must  submit  when  our  critic  condescends  to  impute  every 
thing  which  he  approves  in  thb  history  to  what  he  calls  ^'  the  happy 
tact  of  the  writer,  which  enables  him  to  discover  things  as  it  were  by 
instinct  or  divination,"  because  he  did  not  find  them  proceeding  from 
Hegelian  principles,  and  they  were  not  embellished  with  the  well-known 
formulae  of  his  own  school.  I  am  not,  indeed,  one  of  those  who  strive 
to  affect  ignorance  of  those  results  of  the  Hegelian  philosophy  which 
have  had  so  general  an  influence  upon  the  history  of  our  world.  But 
with  respect  to  historical  writing,  Marheineke's  History  of  the  Reforma- 
tion has  put  the  question  beyond  all  doubt,  that  a  man  can  be  an  emi- 
nent historian,  and  at  the  same  time  a  friend  of  the  Hegelian  philosophy ; 
and  yet  there  are  already  some  symptoms  that  a  zealous  Hegelian  may 
pretty  thoroughly  ruin  the  history  which  he  attempts  to  write.  Indeed, 
there  can  be  no  doubt  that  if  a  history  of  the  Church  were  written,  even 
by  a  writer  as  profound  as  Daub  himself,  on  the  principles  and  method 
lately  recommended  by  him  in  the  Journal  for  Speculative  Theology,  it 
would  turn  out  to  be  utterly  unreadable  to  most  of  our  race.  At  any 
rate,  we  may  console  ourselves  with  the  recollection,  that  since  the  time 
of  Thucydides  there  have  been  some  writers  who,  by  a  happy  tact,  or 
by  divination,  have  been  able  to  produce  something  like  tolerable  his- 
tories, although  it  does  not  appear  that  they  were  guided  by  Hegelian 
principles,  or  used  Hegelian  formulae. 

It  has  been  pleasant  to  me  to  find  that  some  learned  men  of  the 
Catholic  Church  have  recognized  my  honest  intention  to  be  uniformly 
just  toward  their  Church,  and  to  declare  the  whole  truth  in  every  case. 
It  would  hardly  be  candid  in  the  different  parties  generally  to  expect 
from  each  other  more  than  such  acknowledgments  of  good  will,  since  it 
mast  necessarily  be  a  condition  of  their  different  ecclesiastical  positions 
that  the  same  events  should  have  a  different  aspect  in  the  view  of  each, 
and  that  one  should  always  fiild  something  of  which  it  disapproves  in 
the  accounts  of  the  other.  But  it  is  no  small  gain  when  both  are  con- 
vinced of  each  other's  good  will.  I  refer  particularly  to  a  criticism  by 
Prof  Hefeky  in  the  Quarterly  Journal  of  Tubingen,  (1836,  N.  4.)  He 
is  entirely  correct  when  he  says,  that  what  I  have  written  in  ^  333, 
where  it  is  said,  *'  the  idols  were  burned,"  was  not  intended  to  express 
my  own  view.  Nor  is  it  precisely  meant  as  an  expression  of  what 
Zwingle  himself  believed  on  the  subject    It  is  rather  the  view  and  the 


XX  PREFACE   TO  THE   THIRD   EDITION. 

language  of  the  whole  generation  in  that  vicinity  from  which  this  de- 
struction of  the  images  proceeded ;  and  although  the  expression  is  rather 
rude,  it  was  selected  as  the  briefest  by  which  the  motives  of  the  actors 
could  be  made  known.  In  the  passage  in  which  Amsdorf's  installation 
as  Bishop  of  Naumburg  (now  ^  337),  is  mentioned,  I  am  better  agreed 
with  the  honored  Reviewer  than  he  seems  to  have  suspected.  For  when 
it  is  there  said,  '*  The  elector  could  not  resist  the  temptation  to  provide 
an  apostolic  bishop  for  that  see,''  it  is  not  merely  intended  that  such 
was  the  purpose  of  the  elector  and  his  counsellors,  and  such  the  reason 
by  which  they  satisfied  their  own  consciences  in  this  proceeding,  but  a 
slight  touch  of  irony  is  blended  with  the  whole,  and  is  indicated  in  the 
expression,  that  the  elector  could  not  resist  such  a  temptation^  since  the 
apostolic  character  of  this  bishop,  in  the  opinion  of  the  court,  consisted 
principally  in  the  fact,  that  the  new  incumbent  would  draw  but  a  small 
salary,  and  consequently  the  electoral  treasury  would  be  enriched  by 
the  ample  revenues  of  the  bishopric.  I  confess,  too,  that  I  can  see  very 
little  of  a  more  apostolic  character  in  our  Lutheran  lealot  Amsdorf 
than  in  the  mild  and  learned  Julius  von  Pflug.  But  whatever  one  may 
think  with  regard  to  these  points,  the  whole  proceeding  was  in  violation 
of  long  established  rights.  Althoagh  a  little  surprised  that  he  should 
have  called  the  style  of  my  work  enigmaticaly  I  was  happy  to  find  that 
this  Reviewer  fully  appreciated  the  view  which  I  had  expressed  with 
regard  to  the  relation  of  a  text-book  to  the  oral  lecture.  It  would 
seem,  however,  fVom  the  historical  examples  which  he  adduces,  that  he 
at  least  suoceeded  in  completely  understanding  my  meaning  when  I  re- 
marked, that  the  subjects  which  are  more  generally  treated,  and  barely 
hinted  at,  in  the  text-book,  are  founded  upon  distinct  historical  views, 
and  are  so  presented  as  to  invite  the  instructor,  who  is  well  informed 
on  the  minute  details,  to  communicate  and  enlarge  upon  them.  The 
style  required  for  this  I  should  not  call  enigmatic,  merely  because 
those  who  have  not  become  familar  with  the  original  authorities  of  the 
history  may  find  something  not  properly  obscure,  but  to  be  passed  over 
more  superficially  than  other  subjects,  and  without  a  complete  exhaus- 
tion of  it9  contents.  A  germ,  or  a  bud,  cannot,  indeed,  be  fully  seen 
until  it  has  become  expanded  in  the  flower ;  but  whoever  sees  the  bud, 
has  before  him  not  merely  an  enigma,  but  what  is  already  an  intelligible 
reality.  This  is  very  much  like  the  comparison  which  the  Reviewer 
made  between  the  Florentine  and  the  Roman  schools  of  painting,  to 
illustrate  the  distinction  between  Catholic  history  and  my  own,  or  the 
ordinary  orthodox  hbtories  of  the  Church.  Every  well-educated  person 
will  readily  perceive  the  import,  and  the  striking  nature  of  this  com- 
parijM>n.    But  any  one  fiunilar  with  the  peeoliariiies  of  the  two  schools, 


PREFACE  TO   THE   FIFTH   EDITION.  XXI 

and  has  a  vivid  conception  of  their  productions,  will  appreciate  the 
profound  truth,  and  the  extensive  applicability  of  this  ingenious  com- 
parison. 

JsNA,  June  4eA,  1887. 


PREFACE  TO  THE  FOURTH  EDITION. 

During  the  years  which  have  elapsed  while  the  previous  editions  have 
been  given  to  the  public,  I  have  had  time  and  inclination  enough  not 
only  more  thoroughly  to  investigate  many  particulars  (though  I  must 
not  withhold  my  heartiest  thanks  from  those  who  have  assisted  me),  but 
also  to  revise  the  whole,  without,  however,  changing  the  essential  char- 
acter of  the  book.  The  object  for  which  it  was  originally  intended 
would  allow  of  no  augmentation  of  its  size.  The  vastness  of  its  subject 
rendered  all  attempts  to  render  the  contents  themselves  more  perfect  in 
their  relations  and  in  their  distinctness  an  absolutely  interminable 
task.  But  on  this  anniversary  of  the  morning  on  which,  seven  years 
ago,  the  first  preface  of  this  work  was  written,  I  am  painfully  oppressed 
by  the  recollection,  that  a  large  part  of  the  most  vigorous  and  most 
tranquil  portion  of  my  life  has  been  spent  in  efforts  to  improve  a  work 
of  such  a  limited  extent ;  and  I  cannot  venture  upon  any  further  prom- 
ises with  regard  to  future  efforts  in  this  matter. 

Jena,  Ascension  Day^  1841. 


PREFACE  TO  THE  FIFTH  EDITION. 

The  ten  years  to  which  I  alluded  at  the  close  of  the  preface  to  the 
first  edition  have  now  passed,  and  it  is  certain  that  in  an  animated  in- 
tercourse with  the  age  in  which  I  live,  many  of  the  positions  I  first  as- 
sumed have  either  been  more  carefully  verified,  or  have  been  Changed. 
Either  in  the  German,  or  in  a  foreign  language,  this  work  has  found  its 
way  through  the  hands  of  the  youth  into  the  quiet  residences  of  many 
pastors,  and  even  into  palaces.  Thus,  under  the  divine  blessing,  may 
it  proceed  onward  in  its  course,  producing  in  the  Church  a  sound 
consciousness  of  her  historical  development  until  it  shall  have  fulfilled 
its  mission. 

Jkna,  Jan,  1«<,  1844. 


XXll  PREFACE  TO  THE   SIXTH   EDITION. 


PREFACE  TO  THE  SIXTH  EDITION. 

Whatever  is  new  in  this  edition  will  be  found  principallj  in  those 
portions  relating  to  the  most  ancient  and  the  most  modern  times. 
Most  of  what  I  have  added  to  the  former  has  been  occasioned  bj  the 
researches  of  the  new  school  of  Tubingen.  These  were  not  altogether 
unknown  to  me  during  the  composition  of  the  original  work,  but  in  con- 
sequence of  the  works  of  Baur,  Paulus  and  Schwegler,  with  reference  to 
the  period  immediately  after  the  apostles,  they  now  appear  in  more  per- 
fect relations.  I  was  in  no  danger  of  maintaining  an  obstinate  resistance 
to  the  fundamental  principles  of  their  historical  scheme,  to  avoid  the 
necessity  of  taking  back  my  former  assertions  on  the  same  subject,  for, 
in  the  first  edition,  I  had  maintained  that  a  primary  form  of  ecclesi- 
astical orthodoxy  was  Ebionism,  although  afterwards,  in  consequence  of 
the  progress  of  other  views,  this  was  regarded  as  a  heresy.  The  very 
earliest  theological  treatise  which  I  published,  as  long  ago  as  1824,  and 
which  was  quoted  by  Dr.  Schwegler  himself,  was  written  to  show  that 
the  Epistle  to  the  Hebrews  belonged  to  an  Ebionite  party.  And  yet  I 
have  never  been  convinced  that  the  struggle  between  the  Jewish  and  the 
Pauline  parties  continued  as  late  as  a  century  after  the  death  of  the 
apostles,  and  in  countries  beyond  the  limits  of  Palestine,  and  constituted 
the  great  moving  principle  of  the  history  and  literatiire  of  that  century. 
It  did  not  belong  to  a  mere  text-book  to  discuss  the  ingenious  arguments 
which  Dr.  von  Baur  has  brpught  forward,  but  my  present  revision  has 
certainly  gone  quite  far  enough  into  this  matter,  and  my  history  of  this 
oldest  period  of  Church  history  seems  almost  every  where  like  a  quiet 
conference  with  the  Tubingen  school,  by  adopting  or  controverting  whose 
positions  it  has  been  much  benefited.  I  was,  of  course,  unable  to  make 
use  at  that  time  of  the  new  edition  (4  ed.  1847.)  of  Neauder's  history 
of  the  apostolic  Church.  The  abundant  materials  which  the  last  four 
years  have  afforded,  were  easily  added,  like  new  annual  rings  and  shoots, 
to  the  old  trunk  of  the  most  modem  history. 

I  ha^e,  for  this  once,  spared  myself  the  disagreeable  task  of  reading 
the  proof  sheets  for  the  correction  of  typographical  errors,  but  an  un- 
pleasant mistake  has  caught  my  eye  in  note  b,  under  ^  8,  where  my 
diligent  proof-reader,  even  in  opposition  to  grammatical  propriety,  has 
allowed  ab  orbe  condita  to  stand  as  in  the  preceding  edition. 

In  quoting  from  the  Fathers,  and  from  some  other  authors,  I  was 
sometimes  obliged  to  give  the  page,  and  I  therefore  here  mention  the 
editions  to  which  I  referred  :  Athanasii  0pp.  Par.  1627.  Clemen tis 
Alex.  0pp.  ed.  Potter.  Oxon.   1715.     Cypriani  0pp.  ed.  Fell.  Amst. 


PREFACE    TO   THE   SEVENTH    EDITION.  XXIU 

1713.  Epiphanii  0pp.  ed.  Petav.  Par.  1622.  Hieronymi  0pp.  ed. 
Martianay,  when  that  of  Vallarsi  is  not  expressly  mentioned.  Justini 
0pp.  ed.  Otto.  Jen.  1842s.  Leon  M.  0pp.  edd.  Ballerini.  Origenis 
0pp.  ed.  Delarae. — Gerson.  ed.  Da  Pin.  Antu.  1706.  Guicciardini. 
Van.  1583-4.  Mattheus  Paris.  Par.  1644.  Melancth.  Epp.  in  the 
Corpus  Reformatorum  ed.  Bretschneider.  Platina.  1664.  Dutch  edition. 
Trithemi  Annales  Hirsang.  S.  Galli.  1690.  « 

In  the  notes  to  the  latest  modern  history,  the  abbreviations  A.  K. 
Z.  mean  the  (Darmstadt)  Allegemeine  Kirchen-Zeitung ;  Ev.  K.  Z. 
mean  Evangelische  KirchenZeituug ;  Brl.  A.  K.  Z.  mean  Berliner 
Allgemeine-  Kirchen-Zeitung ;  A.  Z.  mean  Augsburger  AUgemeine 
Zeitung ;  L.  A.  Z.,  or  D.  A.  Z.,  mean  Leipziger,  afterwards  Deutsche 
Allgemeine  Zeitung.  It  may  be  that  some  public  documents  which  had 
been  published  in  the  religious,  are  quoted  from  the  political  journals, 
because  I  had  first  met  with  them  in  the  latter,  but  it  is  certainly  very 
desirable  for  future  historical  purposes,  that  our  religious  periojicals 
should  collect  in  a  more  perfect  manner  than  they  have  done  the  original 
documents,  especially  of  foreign  Churches.  This  will  become  especially 
important,  if  the  Acta  historico-ecclesiastica,  which  poor  Eheinwald  com- 
menced, should  never  be  continued. 

Jeka,  Mrst  Sunday  in  Advent,  1847. 


PREFACE  TO  THE  SEVENTH  EDITION. 

Although  I  had  supposed  that  I  had  before  neglected  nothing,  the  re- 
vision of  this  work  for  a  new  impression  has  given  occasion  for  so  many 
improvements,  or  at  least  alterations,  that  the  immensity  of  the  affair 
has  once  more  forced  itself  upon  my  attention.  Hence  the  necessity, 
to  my  present  annoyance,  of  a  much  enlarged  edition.  I  might  very 
properly  excuse  myself  by  saying,  as  Pascal  did,  in  one  of  his  Provin- 
cial Letters,  that  I  have  no  time  to  make  it  briefer.  An  author  oughty 
indeed,  always  to  take  time  for  a  book,  since  generally  he  is  under  no 
necessity  of  publishing  prematurely.  But  the  publication  of  a  new 
edition  is  sometimes  beyond  his  control.  When,  last  Spring,  I  re-com- 
menced my  lectures  upon  Church  History,  a  sufficient  number  of  copies 
of  this  text-book  were  not  to  be  obtained ;  I  was  therefore  obliged  to 
supply  my  pupils  with  the  separate  sheets  as  they  came  from  the  press^ 
and  to  finish  the  preparation  within  a  limited  time. 


XXIV  PBEFACE   TO   THE   SEVENTH   EDITION. 

I  have  been  acoustomed  generally  to  correct  the  last  proof-sheets 
with  my  own  hands,  but  on  the  present  occasion  I  spared  myself  the  un- 
pleasant task  of  reading  to  find  typographical  errors ;  and  I  committed 
to  my  students  the  work  of  diligently  watching  for  these  marks  of 
human  frailty.  Their  keen  young  eyes  have  discovered  some  mistakes 
of  this  kind ;  and  not  to  mention  those  which  are  unimportant,  and  are 
easily  seen  and  corrected,  I  will  only  notice  that  instead  of  Eugenius 
VI. f  on  p.  279,  Eugenius  lY.,  should  be  inserted;  and  instead  of  1835, 

in  the  third  line  from  the  bottom  of  p.  405,  1853  should  be  printed. 

•  ••••••• 

Where  quotations  are  made  from  the  Fathers,  and  some  other 
writers,  and  frequently  the  precise  number  of  the  page  must  be  men- 
tioned, I  have  referred  to  the  following  editions  :  Cypriani  0pp.  od. 
Fell.  Amst.  1713.  Epiphauii  0pp.  ed.  Petav.  Par.  1622.  Hieronymi 
0pp.  ed.  Martianay,  where  Yillarsi  is  not  expressly  mentioned.  Justini 
Oppu  ed.  Otto,  Jen.  1847s.  Leon.  M.  0pp.  ed.  Ballerinii.  Origenis 
0pp.  ed.  Delarue. — Gerson,  ed.  Du  Pin.  Antu.  1706.  Guicciardini ; 
Yen.  1583-4.  Mattheus  Paris;  Par.  1644.  Melancth.  Epp.  in  the 
Corpus  Reformatorum.  Platina  1664.  Dutch  edit.  Trethemii  Annales 
Hirsaug.  S.  Galli.  1690.  Sleidan.  Argent.  1555.  Sarpi  1699-4. 
Seckendorf.  Fraucof.  1688..    Ranke,  deutsche  Gesch.  3.  ed. 

While  the  work  was  passing  through  the  press,  and  after  those 
sections  to  which  they  referred  had  been  printed,  many  important  works 
have  appeared,  which  might  have  had  an  influence  upon  my  statements. 
I  will  not  mention  them  here,  for  after  a  few  months  such  a  list  would 
be  as  imperfect  as  before.  The  author  of  a  monograph  must  be  ex- 
pected, of  course,  to  understand  his  subject  better  than  others ;  but  he 
who  writes  a  general  history,  must  learn  from  many,  and  be  corrected 
by  almost  all. 

Jkna,  Feb.  mhy  1854. 


CONTENTS. 


INTRODUCTION. 


CHAP.  L— PLAN. 


1.  llie  Church  and  the  World, 

2.  Idea  of  Church  History, 

8.  Proper  Province  of  Church  History, 

4.  Relation  to  the  General  History  of  Religion,  • 

6.  Mode  of  Treating  Church  History, 

6.  Value  of  Church  History, 

7.  Sources,      .... 

8.  Auxiliary  Sciences,       .  .  • 

9.  BiYision      .... 


1 
1 

2 
2 
8 
8 
8 
4 
6 


CHAP,  n.— GENERAL  LTTERATURR 


10.  Polemical  Church  History, 

11.  French  Ecclesiastical  Historians,  . 

12.  Protestant  Scientific  Church  History, 

IS.  Writers  of  the  German  Catholic  Church, . 


8 

8 

11 


ANCIENT   CHURCH    HISTORY. 


PERIOD  I. 

FBOM   CHRIST  TO  C0N8TANTINB. 
14.  General  View  and  Original  Authorities,    .  .  . 


18 


DIVISION   L— ESTABLISHMENT   OF  THE   CHURCH. 


CHAP.  L—INTRODUCrORY  HISTORY. 

L  Classio  Hjeathxnisii. 

15.  Popular  Life  among  the  Greeks,    .... 

16.  limits  of  Grecian  Refinement,  .  .  , 

17.  The  Religion  of  the  Greeks,  .... 
1,8.  Relation  of  Philosophy  to  the  Popular  Rdigion, 


.  * 

•  * 


16 
16 
16 
16 


CONTENTS. 


19.  Rome  as  a  Republic, 

20.  Dccliiie  of  Greece, 

21.  Elevation  and  Decline  of  Rome,    . 

22.  Decline  of  the  Popular  Religion, 


n.   JUDAIBH. 


25.  The  Religious  Life  of  the  People,  . 
24.  The  Dispersed  Jews,    . 

26.  Hellenism,  .... 

26.  The  Three  Sects, 

27.  The  Samaritans,     . 

28.  Proselytes, 


CHAP.  II.— THE  APOSTOLIC  CHURCH 


29.  The  First  Pentecost, 

80.  Fortune  of  the  Chiiri.-h  of  Jerusalem, 

31.  Jewish  Christianity, 

82.  Samaritan  Christians  and  Sects, 

88.  Paul,  .... 

84.  Pet«r,    ..... 

86.  Position  of  Parties  in  the  time  of  Paul,    , 

86.  John,     ..... 

87.  Parties  in  the  Time  of  John. 

88.  Traditions  Respecting  the  Apostles,    . 

89.  Apostolical  Fatners  of  the  First  Century, 

40.  Political  Overthrow  of  Judaism, 

41.  The  Roman  Civil  Power,   . 

42.  Constitution  of  the  Local  Churches,    . 
48.  Ecclesiastical  Life, 

44.  Mode  of  Worship, 

45.  Doctrines  of  the  Church,  . 


TAOm 

.      17 

18 

.       18 

19 


20 
21 
21 
22 
23 
23 


24 
25 
26 
26 
27 
80 
81 
88 
84 
85 
86 
86 
87 
88 
89 
40 
41 


DIVISION  IL— FORMATION  OF  THE  CATHOLIC 

CHURCH. 


CHAP.   L— STRUGGLE  OF  THE  CHURCH   FOR  ITS  OWN  EXISTENCE 


46.  The  Jews,   /....... 

47.  The  Roman  People  and  Empire,  ..... 

48.  Conduct  of  the  Individual  Emperors  of  the  Second  and  Third  Centuries, 

49.  Internal  History  of  Paganism,       ..... 

50.  New-Platonism,  ....... 

51.  Literary  Controversies  of  Christianity,     .... 

52.  The  Christian  Apologists,         ...... 

58.  Religion  of  Barbarous  Nations,     ..... 

54.  Spread  of  Christianity,  ...... 

55.  Tne  Last  Persecution,        ...... 

56.  The  Martyrs,    ........ 

CHAP,  n.— SOCLAL  CONSTITUTION  OP  THE  CHURCH 

57.  Original  Documents  on  Ecclesiastical  Law, 

58.  The  Clergy  and  the  Laity,       ...... 

59.  Bishops,      ........ 

60.  Synods,  ...•••.. 

61.  Metropolitans,         ....... 


42 
43 
44 
46 
47 
49 
50 
53 
53 
54 
55 


ropoi 

62.  The  Tnree  Great  Bishops, 
68.  The  Catholic  Church  and  its  Branoheay    . 


56 
67 
59 
60 
60 
61 
62 


CONTENTS. 


XXYU 


CHAP,  m.— ECCLESIASTICAL  LIFR 

64  Christian  Morals,     ...... 

65.  St.  Anthony,      ...... 

66.  Ecclesiastical  Discipline,    .  .  .  .  . 

67.  The  Montaniats,  ..... 

68.  The  Novatians,       ...... 

69.  Holy  Seasons,  and  the  Controversy  about  Easter, 

70.  Sacred  Places,  and  their  Decoration, 

7 1.  Sacred  Services,  ..... 


PAOB 

63 
64 
66 
66 
67 
67 
69 
69 


CHAP.  IV.— DOCTRINES  OF  THE  CHURCH,  AND   OPINIONS  OPPOSED 

TO  THEM. 


72.  Sources  from  which  the  Church  derived  its  System  of  Faith, 

73.  Apostolic  Fathers  of  the  Second  Century.    Oont  fi^)m  g  8Q, 

74.  Ecclesiastical  Literature  and  Heresy, 

75.  Ebiouism.     Cont  from  §  35,    . 

76.  I.  Gnosticism,         ..... 

77.  II.  Syrian  Gnostics,     .... 

78.  in.  Hellenistic  Gnostics,   .... 

79.  IV.  Gnostics,  in  an  especial  sense  Christian,  . 

80.  V.  Judaizing  Gnostics,       .... 

81.  VL  Influence  of  Gnosticism  upon  the  Church, 

82.  Manichaeism,  ..... 

83.  Historico-Ecclesiastieal  Theology, 

84.  Thascius  Caecilianus  Cyprianus,    . 

85.  L  The  School  of  Alexandria,  . 

86.  II.   Characteristics  of  the  Alexandrian  Theology, 

87.  IIL   Influence  of  Origen, 

88.  Appendix  to  the  Literary  History, 

89.  Apocryphal  Literature, 

90.  Subordinationistfi  and  Monarchians, 


71 
72 
78 
74 
75 
77 
78 
81 
88 
86 
86 
88 
89 
91 
98 
94 
96 
96 
98 


PERIOD    II. 

FROM  OONSTANTInS  TO  CHABLES  THE  GfiEAT. 
91.  General  View,  .  .  .  .     . 


101 


DIVISION  I.— THE  IMPERIAL  CHURCH. 

02.  Original  Authorities,    ...... 


CHAR   L— VICTORY  AND  DEFEAT  OF  CHRKTUNITY 

* 

93.  Constantine  and  his  Sons,  .  •  .  .  .  . 

94.  Julianus  Apostata,        ...... 

95.  The  Fall  of  Paganism,        .  .  ... 

96.  Ma^aalians  and  Hypaistarians,  .... 

97.  Christianity  under  the  Persians,   ..... 
98   Abyssinia  and  the  Diaspora,   ..... 
99.  Mohammed,  ....... 

100.  Victories  of  Islam,       .  .  .... 

CHAP.   IL— THEOLOGY  AND  SCIENCE. 

101.  Conflicts  and  Sources  of  the  Ecclesiastical  Life,   . 


101 


.     108 

104 
.     106 

107 
.     107 

108 
.     108 

110 


110 


XXVIU 


CONTENTS. 


L    Thx  Abian  CONTBOyicBST. 

102.  The  Synod  of  Nicaea.    Cont  from  §  90,         . 

108.  Athanasius  and  Arius,        ...... 

104.  Minor  Controversies,    ...... 

106.  The  Synod  of  Constantinople  and  the  Holy  Trinity, 

106.  Ecclesiastical  Literature,         ..... 

IL  Tub  Obigkmstic  Contboykbsy. 

107.  SynesiuB,  Epiphanins,  and  Hicronymus,    .... 

108.  Cnrysostom,      ....... 

ni  Tax  Pelagian  Comtboyxbst. 

109.  Pelagianism  and  Augustinism,       ..... 

110.  Augustinus,      ....... 

111.  Victory  of  Augostinism,    ...... 

112.  Semipelagianiam,  ...... 

lY.    COHTBOYEBSXBI  BS9PB0TXNa  THS  TWO  NaTUBS  OV  OBBOK 

118.  The  Neetorian  Controversy,  .  .  • 

114  The  Entychian  Controversy,   . 

lift.  The  Monophysites,  .... 

116.  Jostinian,  ..... 

117.  The  Edict  of  Peace  and  the  Monophysite  Church, 

118.  The  Monothelite  Controversy, 

119.  Ecclesiastical  Literature,    .... 

CHAP.  HI.— SOCL^  CONSTITUTION  OF  THE  CHURCH 

120.  Legislation  and  Books  of  Law, 

121.  The  Roman  Empire,    .... 

122.  Power  of  the  Emperor  over  the  Church, .  . 
128.  Power  of  the  Church  over  the  State, 
124.  Ecclesiastical  Jurisdiction, 
126.  Church  Property,         .... 

126.  The  Congregation  and  the  Clergy, 

127.  The  Patriarchs.  .... 

128.  The  Roman  Bishopric  hefore  Leo, 

129.  Leo  the  Great,  .  .  .    ^       • 
180l  The  Papacy  after  Leo.    Gregory  the  Great, 
181.  General  Councils  and  the  Catholic  Church,    . 


FA** 

112 
113 
114 
116 
110 


119 
120 


122 
122 
124 
124 


126 

127 
128 
129 
180 
181 
182 


.  134 

136 
.  137 

187 
.  188 

189 
.  140 

141 
.  142 

143 
.  144 

146 


CHAP.  IV.— ECCLESIASTICAL  LIFB. 

182.  Religious  Spirit  of  the  People  and  Ecclesiastical  Piscipline^ 

188.  Celibacy  and  Moral  Condition  of  the  Clergy, 

184w  Monastic  Life  in  the  East, ..... 

186.  Hermits.    Simeon  Stvlites,      .... 

186.  Monasticism  in  the  West    Benedictines, . 

187.  Veneration  for  Saints, ..... 

188.  Public  Worship,     ...... 

189.  Ecclesiastical  Architecture  and  Works  oi  Art, 

140.  Iconoclastic  Controversy,  ..... 


147 
148 
149 
160 
161 
161 
163 
166 
166 


CHAP,  v.— OPPONENTS  OF  THE  ORDINARY  ECCLESIASTICAL  SYSTEM. 


141.  General  View, 

142.  The  Donatists,  . 
148.  Audians,  MassalianB, 
144  Priscilianus, 

146.  Protesting  Ecclesiastical  Teachers, 
146.  History  of  the  Paulioiana,  g  I, 


167 
167 
168 
168 
160 
l&d 


CONTENTS. 


■■CT. 


DIVISION  IL— THE  GERMANIC  CHURCH. 

147.  Original  Authorities,  ...  .  . 

CHAP.  I— ESTABLISHMENT  OF  CHRISTIANITY. 

148.  Religion  of  the  Germans, 

149.  Religion  of  the  Northern  German  Nations, 

100.  Ariaiiism,  .... 

101.  Victory  of  Catholicism, 
1 52.  British  and  Anglo-Saxon  Church, 
153    Irruption  of  Islam  in  the  West,    . 

154.  Germany,  Bonifacius,  . 

155.  llie  Saxons,  .... 

156.  Overthrow  of  German  Paganism, 

CHAP.  IL— SOCIAL  CONSTITUTION  OF  THE  CHURCH. 

157.  Original  Records  of  the  Canon  Law, 

158.  Relation  of  the  Church  to  the  State,  . 
169.  Property  of  the  Church  and  the  Clergy,  . 

160.  Ecclesiastical  Power  of  the  Pope, 

161.  Secular  Power  of  the  Pope,  .... 

162.  Charles  the  Great,        ..... 

CHAP.  m.—ECCLESTASTICAL  LIFE. 

163.  Religious  Spirit  of  the  People,       .... 

164.  Ecclesiastical  Discipline,  .... 

165.  Morals  of  the  Clergy  and  Canonical  Life,  •  • 

166.  Public  Worship,  ..... 

CHAP.  IV.— ECCLESLASTICAL  SCIENOE. 

167.  Preservation  of  Literature, 

168.  Scientific  Education  under  the  Carolingians, . 

169.  Adoptionists,  .  .  .         ^  . 


PAoa 


160 


^TV. 

. 

162 

. 

. 

168 

• 

165 

. 

. 

166 

• 

166 

• 

. 

168 
168 

• 

• 

169 

• 

169 

^URCH. 

• 

• 

170 

. 

• 

171 

• 

• 

171 

• 

• 

172 

• 

• 

178 

. 

• 

178 

• 

• 

174 

• 

• 

176 

• 

• 

176 

• 

• 

177 

1 

• 

• 

178 

. 

• 

179 

• 

• 

180 

MEDIAEVAL  CHURCH  HISTORY, 


PEKIOD  III. 

FROM  CHABLES  TO  INNOCENT  III. 
170.  General  View  and  Authorities,  .  . 


181 


CHAP.  L— GENERAL  DEVELOPMENT  OF  THE  PAPACY. 

171.  rJeneral  View,        ..... 

172.  Donation  of  Constantine  in  the  Ninth  Century, 

173.  Pseudo-Isidore,       ..... 

174.  The  Female  Pope  Joanna, 

175.  Nicholas  I.,  858-867,  and  Hadrian  II,  867-872, 

176.  Formosus,  891-896.     Stephen  VL,  897, 

177.  Pornocracy,  ..... 

178.  The  Popes  under  the  Othos.    . 

179.  The  Papacy  until  the  Synod  of  Sutri, 

180.  The  Popes  under  Ilildebrand,  1048-1073, 


188 
183 
184 
186 
187 
188 
189 
189 
191 
191 


J 


CONTENTS. 


181.  Gregory  VII.,  April  22,  1073-May  26,  1086, 

182.  Gregory's  Successors,  1086-1099, 

188.  llie  Crusades.     Conquest  of  Jerusalem,   . 

184w  Paschal  IL,  1099-1118, 

186.  Calixtus  II..  1119-1124.    Concordat  of  Worms, 

186.  Arnold  of  Brescia,  and  Bernard  of  Clairvaux, 

187.  The  Crusade  of  St  Bernard, 

188.  Frederic  I  Barbarossa,  1152-1190,      . 
189   Thomas  Becket,     .... 

190.  The  Crusade  against  Salaheddin, 

191.  Henry  VL 

192.  Innocent  III,  Jan.  8,  1198-July  16,  1216, 


194 
197 
198 
109 
200 
201 
202 
2U3 
205 
206 
206 
207 


CIIAP.  IL— SOCIAL  CONSTITUTION  OF  THE  CHURCH. 


198.  Gratian  and  his  Predecessors, 

194.  The  Church  and  the  SUte, 

195.  Ecclesiastical  Power  of  the  Papacy, 

196.  The  Cardinals, .... 

197.  The  Bishops,  and  the  Bishops'  Chapters,  . 

198.  Ecclesiastical  Jurisdiction, 

199.  Property  of  the  Church,    . 


•  •  • 

•  •  • 

•  •  • 


211 
212 
214 
216 
216 
217 
218 


CHAP.  HI.— ECCLESLASTICAL  LIFE. 


200.  The  Religious  Spirit  of  the  People, 

201.  Manners  of  the  Clergy, 

202.  Church  Discipline, 
208.  Public  Worship, 

204.  Monastic  life,         .... 

205.  The  Congregation  of  Clugny,  . 

206.  Minor  Orders  of  the  Seventh  Century,    . 

207.  The  Cistercians  and  St  Bernard, 

208.  Praemonstrants  and  Carmelites,     . 

209.  The  Trinitarians, 

210.  The  Humiliates,     .... 

211.  Establishment  of  the  Orders  of  Knighthood, 


.  219 

221 
.  222 

223 
.  226 

226 
.  227 

228 
.  229 

230 
.  231 

231 


CHAP.   IV.— STATE  OF  SCIENCE  IN  THE  CHURCH. 

212.  Scientific  Education  of  the  Ninth  Century,    . 

218.  First  Eucharistio  Controversy,       .... 

214.  Gottschalk.    Cont  from  §  12... 

216.  Literary  Interest  during?  the  Tenth  Century,  under  the  Othos, 

216.  Academical  Studies  in  the  Eleventh  and  Twelfth  Centuries, 

217.  The  Second  Eucharistic  Controversy, 

218.  Scholasticism.    First  Period,    .... 

219.  Mysticism.    First  Period,  ..... 

220.  Abelard,  1079-April  21,  1142, 

221.  The  Sacred  Scriptures,       ..... 

222.  Commencement  of  a  National  Literature  in  the  Twelfth  Century, 


232 
234 
235 
235 
236 
237 
238 
240 
241 
243 
243 


CHAP,  v.— EXTENSION  OF  THE  ROMAN  CATHOLIC  CHURCIL 

228.  The  Holy  Ansgar,  801-865,  ...... 

224.  Germanic  Nations  of  the  North,  ..... 

226.  The  Slavic  Nations,  .       •     . 

226.  Tlie  Hungarians,  .  .  . 

227.  The  Finns,  Livonians,  and  Esthonians,      ..... 


246 
246 
248 
260 
250 


CONTENTS. 


XXXI 


WCT. 


CHAP.  VI.—PARTll'S  PROTESTING   AGAINST  THE   CHURCH. 


228.  The  Catharists,  ..... 

229.  Peter  of  Bruys  and  Henry.     Tanchelm  and  Eon, 

230.  The  Waldenses,  .    *        . 

231.  llie  Albigeiisian  War,        ..... 

CHAP.  VH.— THE  ORIENTAL  CHURCH. 

232.  Extension  of  the  Church,  .... 

233.  The  Roman  Empire  and  tlie  Church, 

234.  Photius,  ...... 

285.  Division  of  the  Church,      ..... 

236.  State  of  Science,  ..... 

237.  Paulicians.     §  2.     Cont  from  §  140, 


251 
258 
254 
265. 


256 
257 
25$ 
25U 
2tiU 
261 


PERIOD    IV. 

FROM   INNOCENT   III.   TO   LUTHEB. 
238.  General  View  and  Hifltorical  Writers, 


239. 
240. 
241. 
242. 
243. 
244. 
245. 
246. 
247. 
248. 
249. 
250. 
251. 
252. 
268. 
254. 
255. 
256. 
257. 


258. 
259. 
260. 
261. 
262. 
263. 
264. 


265. 
266. 
267. 
268. 
269. 
270. 
271. 


CHAP.  L— RELATION  OF  THE  PAPACY  TO  GENERAL  AFFAIRS. 

Frederic  11. , 

Overthrow  of  the  House  of  Hohenstaufen,     . 

St.  Louis,    ...... 

Termination  of  the  Crusades,  .... 

Rudolph  of  Hapsburg,  1273-1291.    Sicilian  Vespers, 

The  Hermit  in  the  Papal  Chair,  July  5-Dec.  13,  1294, 

Boniface  VIIL,  Dec.  24,  1294-Oct  11.  1303, 

Commencement  of  the  Babylonian  Exile, 

Louis  of  Bavaria,  1314-1347.    .loanna  L  of  Naples, 

Close  of  the  Babylonian  Exile, 

The  Schism,  ..... 

C^juncil  of  Pisa,  March  25-Aug.  7,  1409, 

Council  of  Constance,  Nov.  5,  1414-April  22,  1418, 

Martin  V.,  Nov.  11,  1417-Feb.  20,  1431, 

Council  of  Basle,  1431-1443  (1449), 

The  Popes  until  the  End  of  the  Fifteenth  Century,    . 

Alexander  VL,  Aug.  2,  1492-Aug.  18,  1503, 

Julius  H-,  Nov.  1,  1603-Feb.  21,  1513, 

Leo  X,  March  11,  1513-1617  (1521), 


CHAP,  a— SOCLAX  CONSTITUTION  OF  THE 

Corpus  Juris  Canonici,       .... 

The  State  and  the  Church,       .... 

Ecclesiastical  Power  of  the  Papacy, 

Ecclesiastical  Assemblies,         .... 

The  National  Churches,     .... 

The  Bishops  and  their  Jurisdiction,     . 

The  Inquisition,      ..... 

CIL\P.  III.— ECCLESL^TICAL  LIFR 

The  Two  Groat  Mendicant  Orders, 

Public  Worship,  ..... 

Flourishing  Period  of  the  Iniitiitive  Arts  in  the  Church, 

Worship  of  the  Saintd,  .... 

Miracles  and  Magic,  .... 

Church  Discipline  and  InduTgences,     . 

Flagollants  and  Dancei-s,     .... 


CHURCK 


268 


265 
267 
268 
269 
269 
270 
271 
272 
278 
274 
276 
276 
277 
278 
279 
281 
282 
283 
285 


286 
287 
288 
290 
21*2 
202 
2^3 


295 
300 
302 
807 
309 
311 
812 


XXXll 


CONTENTS. 


•CCT. 


272.  Morals  of  the  Clergy,  .......  814 

278.  Religious  Character  of  the  People,  .....     816 

274.  Survey  of  the  Monastic  Life,  .  .  .  .  .  .816 

276.  More  iudependent  Associations,    .  .  .  .  .  .817 

276.  The  Templars  and  the  Knights  of  St  John,    .  .  .  .  818 

CHAP.  IV.— ECCLESIASTICAL  LITERATURR 

277.  Scholasticism.     Second  Period,      ......     820 

278.  Scholasticism.    Third  Period,  ......  821 

279.  Mysticism-     Second  Period,  ......     822 

280.  Excesses  and  Compromises,      ......  824 

281.  The  so-called  Revival  of  literature,  .....     826 

282.  John  Reuchlin,  1466-1522,      ......  829 

288.  Desiderius  Erasmus,  1466-1686,    ......     88o 

284.  The  Holy  Scriptures,   .  .  .  .  .  .  .881 

286.  The  Doctrine  of  the  Church,         .  .  .  .  .  .882 

286.  Ethics  and  Casuistry,  .......  883 

CHAP,  v.— EXTENSION  OF  THE  ROMAN  CATHOLIC  CHURCH. 

287.  Apologetics.    Islam.    Judaism,      ......  885 

288.  Prussia.    Lithuania.    Lapland,  .....  88C 

289.  Prester  John  and  the  Mongols,       ......  387 

29a  The  New  World,  .......  838 

CHAP.  VL—OPPOSmON  AND  REFORM. 

291.  General  View,        .......  8S8 

I.   Hostile  Pabtos. 

292.  The  Stedingers  and  the  Heretical  Ghibellines,  .  .  8ao 
298.  Fraternity  of  the  Free  Spirit,        ......     84<» 

294.  Order  of  the  Apostles,  .  .  .  .  .  .  84 1 

296.  Termination  of  the  Earlier  Sects,  .  .  .  .  •  .812 

IL   REFoaac 

296.  Reformation  in  the  Head  and  Members,  ....  848 

297.  John  Wycliffe,  1824-Dec.  81,  1381,  .  .  .  .  .846 

298.  John  Huss  and  the  Hussites,    ......  847 

299.  The  Bohemian  and  Moravian  Brethren,    .....     860 

800.  Learned  Precursors  of  the  Reformation  in  Germany,  .  .  851 

801.  Jerome  Savonarola,  .......     862 

CHAP.  VIL— THE  GREEK  CHURCR 

802.  Arsenius,  ........  854 

808.  The  Light  of  God  and  Philosophy,  .  .  .  .  .354 

804.  Attempts  at  Union.     Cont  from  %  286,  ....  355 

806.  End  oi  the  Greek  Empire,  ......     806 


MODERN  CHURCH  HISTORY. 

PERIOD  V. 

FROM   LUTHER  TO  THE   PEACE   OP   WESTPHALIA. 
S06.  General  View,        ........    858 

CHAP.   L— THE  GERMAN  REFORMATION. 
807.  Original  Authorities  and  Literary  History,    ....  869 


CONTENTS. 


xxxm 


808. 
809. 
810. 
811. 
812. 
818. 
814. 
815. 
816. 
817. 
81S. 
819. 
820. 
821. 
822. 
823. 
824. 
325. 
826. 
827. 
828. 
829. 
830. 
331. 


I.   Establishment  of  the  Lutheran  Church  till  1532. 

Luther's  Youth,      ...... 

The  Ninety-Five  Theses,  .... 

Interference  of  the  Pope,   ..... 

Amicable  Negotiations,  .... 

Deputation  at  Leipsio,  June  27-July,  16,  1619,    . 

Melancthon.    General  Affairs, 

Appeal  to  the  Christian  Nobility  of  the  German  Nation, 

Babylonian  Captivity  and  Christian  Freedom, 

The  Fire-Signal,      ...... 

Political  Relations  till  1621,    .... 

Diet  at  Worms,  1621,         ..... 

The  Wartburg,  and  the  Tumult  at  Wittenberg,  1621,  1622, 

System  of  Doctrines  and  the  Scriptures,   . 

Diet  at  Nuremberg,  1522,  1523, 

Introduction  of  the  Reformation,  .... 

Commencement  of  the  Division  in  Germany,  1524-1526, 

The  King  and  the  Theologian, 

Peasant**  War,  1524,  1526,       .... 

Erasmus  and  Luther.    Cont  from  8  285,  .  .  . 

Luther's  Domestic  Life,  and  his  Colleagues,    . 

Religious  Liberty  and  the  Protestation,     . 

Synod  of  Homburg,  1526.    Saxon  Church  Visitation,  1527-1529 

Tne  Diet  of  Augsburg,  1530, 

League  of  Smalkald  and  Peace  of  Nuremberg, 

IL  Establishment  of  the  Reformed  Church  umtil  1581 


332.  Youth  and  Doctrine  of  Zwingle,   . 
833.  Introduction  of  the  Reformation, 
334.  Division  of  the  Swiss  Confederacy, 
835.  The  Sacramentarian  Controversy, 


.     861 

363 
.     363 

364 
.     365 

866 
.     867 

868 
.     869 

370 
.     871 

372 
.     878 

878 
.     874 

876 
.  877 
.  877 
.    879 

880 
.    881 

382 
.     883 

383 


884 
886 
888 
889 


lU.    ESTABLISHHENT   OF  THE   LUTHERAN   ChURCH   UNTIL   1556. 

836.  Articles  of  Smalkald,  ...... 

837.  Progress  and  Political  Power  of  the  Reformation,      .  , 
888.  Negotiations  for  Peace  and  Preparations  for  War, 

839.  Ludier's  Death  and  Public  Character, 

840.  The  Smalkaldic  War,  1646-7,        ..... 

841.  The  Interim,    ....... 

842.  Maurice,  1552,        ....... 

848.  Religious  Peace,  Sept  25,  1656,  .... 


890 
891 
393 
894 
895 
396 
397 
808 


lY.    ESTABUBHMENT  OF  THE  REFORMED   ChURGH  X7NTIL  1564. 

844.  The  Concordium  of  Wittenbei'g.     Cont  from  §  338, 

845.  Italian  Switzerland,      ...... 

846.  John  Calvin,  July  10,  1509-May  27,  1564, 


899 

400 
400 


CHAP.   IL— ESTABLISHMENT  OF  A  PROTESTANT  ORTHODOXY. 


I.    LUTHERANIBM. 

347.  The  Antinomian  and  Osiandrian  Controversies, 

348.  Lutherans  and  Philippista.     General  Affairs, 
849.  The  Synergistic  Controversy,  . 

350.  Crypto-Calvinism.    Cont  finom  §  844, 

851.  Efforts  at  Concord,       .... 

852.  Reaction  of  Saxon  Calvinism, 

858.  Spirit  and  Result  of  the  Doctrinal  Controversy, 


402  • 

404 

405 

407 

409 

410 

411 


XXXIV 


CONTENTS. 


Mcr. 


n.  Calvinism. 


864.  German  Reformed  Church, 

866.  The  Netherlands,  ..... 

366.  Tlie  Synod  of  Dort,  Nov.  13,  1618-end  of  May,  1619, 


PASS 

412 
414 
416 


CHAP.  IlL— PROGRESS  OF  THE  REFORMATION  THROUGH  EUROPR 


857.  Tlie  United  Austrian  States  until  1609, 
368.  Sweden,      .... 

359.  Denmark  with  Norway  and  Iceland,  . 

360.  Poland,  Livonia,  and  Koorland,    . 


416 
418 
419 
420 


L  Great  Brttain  and  IssLAinx 

861.  Establishment  of  the  Anglican  Church, 

362.  Origin  of  the  Puritans  and  Independents, 

368.  Scotland,  ...... 

864.  Great  Britain  under  the  Stuarts,  . 


421 
428 
424 
426 


IL    FHANOIL 


866.  Tlie  Night  of  St  Bartholomew, 

866.  The  Edict  of  Nantes, 

867.  Spain  and  Italy, 


426 
428 
429 


CHAP.  IV.— FANATICS  AND  ULTRAISTS  OF  THE  REFORMATION. 


868.  General  Relations  of  the  Reformation, 

869.  Anabaptists  as  Fanatics,  .  .  .  . 

870.  Anabaptists  as  an  Orderly  Community.    CoUegiants, 

871.  Antitrinitarians,  .  .  .  .  . 

872.  Socinians,    ...... 

878.  Caspar  Schwenckfdd,  of  Ossing.    Sebastian  Franck, 


430 
431 
482 
432 
434 
436 


CHAP,  v.— CONDITION  AND  RESULTS  OF  PROTESTANTISM. 

874  Protestantism  as  a  Principle,         ...... 

376.  Morals,  ........ 

876.  Law,  ......... 

877.  The  Clergy,  and  Church  Property,     ..... 

878.  Public  Worship  and  Art,  .  ... 

879.  Humanistic  Education  and  Holy  Scriptures.     Cont  from  §  284, 

880.  Philosophy  and  Theosophy.     Mysticism  and  Practical  Christianity, 


CHAP.  VL— THE  ROMAN  CATHOLIC  CHURCH. 

881.  The  Popes  in  the  Age  of  the  Reformation,  till  1686,  . 

882.  Ignatius  de  Loyola,  1491-1656,     . 
388.  Development  of  Jesuitism, 
384.  The  Council  of  Trent,  Dec  13,  1646-Dec  14,  1668, 

885.  Sixtus  v.,  April  27,  1685-Aug  27,  1690, 

886.  Popes  of  the  Seventeenth  Century, 
387.  Law  and  Political  Relations,  .... 

888.  Great  Change  in  the  Character  of  Catholicism,    . 

889.  Fraternities  for  Instruction  and  Charity, 

890.  The  Fine  Art*,       ..... 

891.  Tlie  Sacred  Scriptures.    Cont  from  §§  286,  386, 

892.  Laws  respecting  Doctrines  and  Internal  Theological  Controversies, 
898.  Efforts  at  Reconciliation,  and  Controversies  with  the  Protestauta, 

894.  The  Propaganda,    ....... 

895.  The  East  Indies,  ...... 


487 
488 
440 
443 
444 
446 
447 


460 
.  452 

453 
.  454 

456 
.  456 

458 
.  460 

462 
.  464 

465 
.  466 

4^8 
.  470 

470 


CONTENTS. 


XXXV 


SBCT. 


896.  Japan,         .  .  .  . 

897.  China,  .... 

898.  West  Indies.     Cont  from  §  290,    . 


CHAP.  Vn.— THE  TPIRTY  YEABS*  WAR. 


899.  Occasions,         .... 

400.  The  Bohemian  War.     Cont  from  §  367,  . 

401.  The  Gennan  War, 

402.  The  Peace  of  Westphalia, . 


CHAP.  Vm.— THE  ORIENTAL  CHURCH. 


403.  Connections  with  Protestants, 

404.  The  Rnssian  Church, 

405.  The  Abyssinians  and  Maronites, 


472 
474 
476 


476 
477 
478 
479 


480 
481 
482 


PERIOD    VI. 

FROM  THE  PEACE  OF  WESTPHALIA.  TO  THE  PRESENT  TIME. 

406.  General  View,        ........ 

CHAP.  I.— PROTESTANT  EVANGELICAL  CHURCH  UNTIL  1760. 

407.  German  Orthodoxy, 

408.  George  Calixtus,  1586-1666,  .  ./ 

409.  Pietism.     Spener,  1685-1705, . 

410.  Philosophical  Influences.     Cartesius  to  Wolf, 

411.  Peaceable  Movements  in  Theology, 

412.  Law  and  Legal  Views  in  the  German  Church, 

413.  Legal  Relations  to  the  Catholic  Church, 

414.  Attempts  at  Union, 
416.  The  English  Revolution.     Cont.  from  §  364, 

41 6.  Freethinkers  or  Deists, 

417.  The  Quakers,    .... 

418.  The  United  Brethren.     Zinzendorf,  1700-1760, 
119.  The  Methodists.     Wesley,  1703-1791.     Whitefield,  1714-1770, 

420.  The  Church  of  the  New  Jerusalem.     Swedenborg,  1688-1772, 

421.  Minor  Fanatical  Parties,  ..... 

422.  Spread  of  Christianity,      .  . 

CHAP.  II.— ROMAN  CATHOLIC  CHURCH  UNTIL  1760. 

423.  The  Papacy,    ........ 

424.  The  Gallican  Church,         ...  .  . 


Jaxsenism. 

426.  L    Port-Royal, ........ 

426.  IL   The  Constitution  Uuigenitus,  ..... 

427.  Mysticism,  Quietism,  and  Pious  Humor,  .  .  .  . 

428.  Newly  Established  Orders,  ..... 

429.  Spread  of  Christianity.    Cont  from  §  394ss , . 

CHAP.  IIL— ROMAN  CATHOLIC  CHURCH  UNTIL  1814. 

L   Mattebs  Preliminary  to  tue  Revolution. 

430.  French  Philosophy.     Cont  from  §  416,     .... 

431.  Clement  XIU  (1768-69)  and  the  Jesuits,        .... 


488 


484 
486 
487 
489 
490 
492 
492 
496 
497 
498 
602 
608 
606 
606 
608 
610 


611 

614 


616 
618 
619 
621 
621  • 


622 
624 


ZXXVl 


CONTENTS. 


432.  Clement  XIV.  (1769-74)  and  the  Jesuits, .  .  .  . 

488.  Pius  VI.  (1774-99)  and  his  Age  until  1789,    . 

II.  French  Reyolutiox. 

484.  The  National  Assembly  (ConstJtuante),  1789-1791, 

435.  The  Legislative  Assembly  and  National  Convention,  1791-1795, 

486.  Theophilanthropists,  1796-1802,    .  .  .  .  . 

487.  The  Roman  Republic.     Cont  from  §  488, 

ILL  TuE  Era  op  Napoleox. 

438.  Pius  VIL  and  the  Re-establishment  of  the  Gallioan  Church, 

439.  Dispute  between  the  Emperor  and  the  Pope, 

440.  Overthrow  of  the  Ecclesiastical  German  Constitution,    . 


PAoa 

525 
526 


529 
531 
532 
582 


533 
534 
536 


CHAP.  IV.— THE  PROTESTANT  EVANGELICAL  CHURCH  TILL  1814. 

441.  The  Age  of  Enlightenment     Cont  from  8S  416,  480,  .  .  587 

442.  Christian  Reaction.  I^russian  Religious  Edict,  ....  539 
448.  Revolution  in  German  Literature,  .....  541 
444  Reformation  of  Philosophy  in  Germany,  .            .            •            •            .  548 

445.  Rationalism  and  Supematuralism,       .  .  •  •  544 

446.  The  Ecclesiastical  Party  in  Germany,       .....  545 

447.  Small  Fanatical  Parties,  ......  546 

448.  Civil  Relations  of  Protestants  under  Catholic  Govemmenta    Cont  from 

§413, 547 


CHAP,  v.— THE  PROTESTANT  EVANGELICAL  CHURCH  TILL  1853. 


449.  Development  of  Protestantism,  .... 

450.  The  Philosophy'  of  the  Absolute,  and  its  Ramifications,   . 

451.  Orthodox  Pietism  and  its  Extremes,    .... 
462.  Undecided  Controversies  between  Old  and  New  Protestantism, 
458.  Prussia,  the  Union  and  the  Agenda  till  1840.     Cont  from  §  414, 
454.  Lutheranism  as  a  Sect  under  Frederic  William  III., 
4.>5.  Legal  Views  and  Legal  Relations  in  German  Countries, 

456.  The  Prussian  National  Church  and  its  Branches  since  1840, 

457.  Combinations,  ....... 

458.  The  Scriptures.     Cont  from  §§  879,  411, . 

459.  Calvinism  as  a  Sect,      ...... 

460.  Division  of  the  Church  in  Scotland  and  in  the  Pays  de  Vaud, 

461.  Tlie  Anglican  Church  and  the  Dissenters, 

462.  Ecclesiastical  Affairs  in  the  North  American  Republic,    . 
468   Legal  Condition  with  respect  to  Catholic  Governments, 

464.  Old  and  New  Sects,  ..... 

465.  Missionary  and  Bible  Societies,  .... 

466.  Spread  of  Christianity,      ....<. 


548 
550 
555 
560 
566 
569 
571 
576 
587 
592 
595 
597 
598 
601 
605 
610 
612 
614 


CHAP.  VL— THE  ROMAN  CATHOLIC  CHURCH  TILL  1858. 

467.  Re-establishment  of  the  Roman  Hierarchy.    Cont  from  §  489,         .  617 

468.  The  Popes  before  the  Last,             ......  619 

469.  Pius  IX  (June  16,  1846)  and  It^ly, 620 

47a  Tlie  Gallican  Church,        .  .  .  .  .  .  .624 

471.  Spain.    Portugal    South  America,    .....  629 

472.  Belgium  and  Holland,        .......  633 

478.  Restoration  of  the  German  Church,    .....  635 

474.  Tlie  Ecclesiastical  Controversy  in  Prussian  Germany,      .            .            .  636 

475.  The  German  Church  since  1848|         .....  640 

476.  Switzerland,           ........  645 

477.  Ireland  and  England,  .......  649 

478.  Forms  of  Catholicism,        .....                        .  652 


CONTENTS. 


XXXVU 


479.  German  Catholicism,    .... 

480.  Mystics  and  Wonder- Workers, 

481.  Orders,  ..... 

482.  Spread  of  Christianity.    Cont  from  §§  894,  429, . 


PAOB 

656 
661 
662 
663 


CHAP.  VIL— THE  ORIENTAL  CHURCH. 


483.  Catholic  and  Protestant  Influences, 

484.  Russia.     Cont  from  §  404, 

485.  Greece  and  Turkey,     . 


665 
666 
669 


CHAP.  VHL— COMMON  DETAILS  AND  MUTUAL  RELATIONE 

486.  Catholicism  and  Protestantism,      .  .  .  .  .  .671 

487.  The  Fine  Arts.    Cont  from  §§  378,  390,         ....  674 

488.  Emancipation  and  Conversion  of  the  Jews,  .  .  .  .675 

489.  Abolition  of  Slavery,   .......  677 

490.  St.  Simonism  and  Socialism,  ......     679 

491.  The  Holy  Alliance,      .......  681 

Appendix,   .........     688 


INTRODUCTION. 


C.  SagtUariuM,  Introd.  in  Hist  Eec  Jen.  T.  L 1694.  YoL  IL  ftA.  Ji  A.  Sehmid,  1718.  4  F. 
Walch^  Orosds&tze  d.  xur  KHlst  nGthlgen  Yf^beraitongBlehren  u.  BQcberkenntn.  65tt  ed  S.  1771 
C.  W.  Fl&ifge,  EinL  in  d.  Stodiom  a.  in  d.  Litentnr  d.  BeL  n.  KOeach.  Outt  1801.  {J.  O.  Dow- 
Un{/,  Introd.  to  the  Crit  Stady  of  Eoa  Hist  Lond.  1883.  %.  J.  Jortin^  Bemarks  on  Eco.  Hist  Lond. 
1948k  2  toLb.  &  W.  BatMt  College  Lectt  on  £o&  Hist  Lond.  1845.  &  G,  Campbell,  Lectt  on  Soc. 
Hist  Lond.  1884.  &) 

CHAP.  L— PLAN. 

jT.  p.  JkOtegarUn,  fL  Stud.  Plan  n.  Darst  d.  Allg.  EQesdi.  B6tsL  1824  UUmann,  Q.  SteQnng 
dfls  KHiat  in  unsrer  Zeit  (Stud.  a.  Krit  1828.  p.  667aL)  J.  A,  ffi  TlUmann^  0.  BehandL  d. 
KOesch.  Toix  anf  Unlr.  (Illgen's  Zeitscbr.  1882.  toL  L  st  2.)  Daub,  d.  Form.  d.  Dogmen  jl 
KHlst  (Zeitscbr.  t  SpelEnL  Th.  1886.  yoL  L  H.  1)  MdMer,  EinU  In.  d.  KQesch.  (Hist  FoL  BL  t 
d.  Kath.  DeatsebL  1888.  toL  IY.  H.  1-a  n.  Qeaanun.  Schrr.  vol  XL) 

§  1.     The  Church  and  the  World. 

The  Church  was  originally  founded  by  the  Spirit  which  proceeded  from 
Jeena,  and  was  intended  to  embrace  in  its  communion  all  the  religions  life 
derived  from  Him,  or  in  connection  with  Hun.  All  Churches  and  SecU  com- 
prehended in  this  spiritnal  community,  are  only  different  manifestations  of 
the  same  Spirit.  The  Ohnrch  stands  in  contrast  with  the  World,  when  the 
latter  is  regarded  as  including  all  forms  of  life  which  are  merely  natural,  and 
not  of  a  religious  character.  Especially  does  it  thus  stand  contrasted  with  the 
State,  viewed  as  the  political  organization  of  the  people.  This  contrast,  how* 
ever,  is  only  in  particular  relations,  since  the  State  is  also  a  divine  institution, 
and  the  world  was  created  by  Grod  and  is  intended  to  be  gradually  pervaded 
by  the  Church.  Indeed,  the  Church,  in  its  character  of  the  earthly  kingdom 
of  God,  can  never  be  fully  set  forth,  except  in  intimate  connection  with  the 
world. 

§  2.    Idea  of  Church  History, 

[P.  Sehiif.  A  YlBdieation  of  tbe  Idea  of  Hist  Deyelopment,  Philad.  184&  12.  8e«  also  his  Hist 
of  Apoet  Cbnrcb,  New  York,  186&] 

The  Church  is  always  in  a  progressive  state ;  i.  tf.,  it  is  striving  to  be  a  per- 
petual manifestation  of  the  life  of  Christ  in  humanity.  In  other  words,  it  is 
always  aiming  to  exhibit  his  life  more  and  more  perfectly,  and  on  a  more  ex- 

1 


r 


2  INTRODUCTION.    CHAP.  L    PLAN. 

teDsive  scale,  sometimes  in  conflict,  and  sometimes  in  connection  with  the 
world.  Church  history  is  a  representation  of  the  Church  in  this  progressive 
state,  by  an  exhibition  of  the  facts  which  have  occurred  in  its  course.  In  its 
scientific  form,  it  is  the  combination  of  all  those  individual  elements  which 
have  had  any  influence  upon  its  composition,  since  it  is,  1)  critically^  an  im- 
partial, honest,  and  strict  inquiry  into  facts,  and  into  the  extent  of  the  confi- 
dence which  can  be  reposed  in  their  proofs,  so  that  where  certainty  cannot  be 
attained,  a  knowledge  of  this  extent  in  its  different  degrees  may  determine 
the  scientific  character  of  the  narrative ;  2)  geneticaUy^  a  statement  of  the 
facts  in  connection  with  their  causes,  taking  care,  however,  that  no  explana- 
tions are  given  inconsistent  with  the  proper  nature  of  the  idea  developed  in 
the  events,  or  with  the  peculiar  character  of  the  active  agents  in  them ; 
8)  theologically^  an  estimation  of  the  facts  in  their  precise  relation  to  the  reli- 
gious spirit,  allowing  no  preconceived  opinions  to  determine  what  has  actu- 
ally occurred  but  only  to  assist  in  understanding  them  as  we  find  them.  The 
correct  manner  of  narration,  or  the  historical  styU^  is  that  which  the  student 
naturally  adopts  when  he  has  acquired  a  true  conception  of  the  events,  and 
then  fully  expresses  this  in  living  freshness  and  reality. 

§  8.    Proper  Province  of  Church  History, 

Within  the  appropriate  department  of  Church  History  lie  all  facts  which 
either  proceed  directly  from  the  common  Christian  spirit,  or  indirectly  are 
dependent  upon  the  opposition  or  co-operation  of  the  world.  Some  of  these 
belong  necessarily  to  the  history,  and  are  essential  points  of  development  by 
which  the  Christian  spirit  must  be  represented  ;  but  others  are  only  carefully 
selected  representatives  of  the  age  in  which  they  occur,  or  peculiar  manifes- 
tations of  the  Christian  spirit  in  some  important  individuals. 

§  4.    Relation  to  the  General  History  of  Religion, 

Hist  gr6n6rale  des  odrdmonies,  xnoenn  et  coutiiines  rel.  de  tons  les  penp1e^  repr^nt^es  par  figures 
desrincM  de  la  main  de  &  Picard,  aveo  des  explicat  hist  (Atnst  17288a.  7  Tola.)  Par.  17418a. 
8  vols.  J.  Mtsiner6,  Allg.  Krlt  Gosch.  d.  Bellgrionen.  Ilann.  18068.  S  Th.  E,  V.  WeiiUr,  Ideen  z. 
Gesch.  d.  Entw.  d.  KeL  GL  MQnch,  1S0S-1S15.  8  Th.  B^nj,  Corutani,  do  la  Beliglon,  considcroc  dana 
sa  source,  sea  formes  et  sea  d^vcloppemcna,  Par.  1824s8.  2  Th.  Ubera.  m.  Anm.  t.  Petri  BrL  18246. 
2volsi 

The  object  of  a  general  history  of  religion,  of  which  Church  history  is 
only  a  single  department,  is  the  development  of  the  religious  spirit  of  man- 
kind in  all  the  forms  in  which  it  has  appeared.  But  the  religious  peculiari- 
ties of  unevangelized  nations  are  only  to  be  introduced  into  Church  history, 
when  they  are  in  some  way  involved  in  the  aifairs  of  Christendom  (general- 
ly, at  first,  in  conflict  with  it),  or  when  they  occasion  some  new  relations  in 
it.  For,  as  the  Law  was  adapted  to  lead  the  Jew  and  Philosophy  the  Greek 
to  Christy  the  same  result  might  be  produced  among  other  nations  by  their 
confidence  in  their  own  gods.  Accordingly,  as  Christianity  Is  a  religion  for 
the  whole  human  race,  and  is  therefore  the  ultimate  point  and  perfection  of 
all  other  religions,  Church  History  should  be  the  central  point  of  all  histo- 
ries of  religion,  and  should  gradually  incorporate  within  itself  their  collected 
results. 


S6.    MODE.    YALUK    80UBCES.  3 

§  6.    Mode  of  Treating  Church  History. 

The  Christian  spirit,  in  the  development  of  its  infinite  natnre,  and  while 
gradnflUj  appropriating  all  human  things  to  its  use,  is  destined  and  is  com- 
petent to  be  the  religions  spirit  of  man.  This  result,  however,  will  be  ac- 
complished by  means  accordant  with  its  own  peculiar  law.  As  the  organs  by 
which  it  operates  are  necessarily  free  individuals  and  nations,  free  even  for 
error  and  sin,  the  original  principles  of  the  historical  movement  must  neces- 
sarily assume  an  endless  diversity  of  form  in  the  lives  of  individuals.  Hence, 
the  historical  .judgment,  as  it  is  expressed  in  the  representation  of  the  events, 
must  seize  upon  all  these  as  points  of  development  which  find  their  own  ar- 
rangement, and  have  each  an  appropriate  influence.  It  is  not,  however,  in- 
dispensable to  the  impartiality  of  the  historian,  that  he  should  appear  to  love 
nothing  and  to  hate  nothing.  It  is  only  needful,  first  of  all,  that  he  should  nev- 
er place  the  actual  facts  in  false  positions,  on  account  of  either  preferences  or 
aversions,  and  then,  that  he  should  recognize  those  conditions  under  which 
others  have  perhaps  necessarily  formed  opinions  and  sentiments  different 
from  his  own.  Indeed,  a  Church  History,  in  which  the  author  exhibited  no 
distinct  ecclesiastical  character,  and  did  not  imprint  this  with  clearness  upon 
his  work,  would  be  of  very  little  value  to  the  Church. 

§  6.     Value  of  Church  HUtory, 

Gristb€U^  de  11.  EccL  Utllitate,  Jen.  1776i  F.  A.  Bdths,  t.  Einfl.  de&  KlrchenbiBt  8tad.  anf  d. 
BildoDg  del  Oem&tbs  n.  d.  Leben.  Lp&  ISIO.  i.  T.  A.  Clarisu^  Or.  de  Socletatls  Cbr.  Hist  ad  In- 
ftmn.  Bftcrorom  antlstttem  accommodate  tradenda.  Gron.  1824. 

The  absolute  value  of  Church  History  springs  from  the  fact,  that  it  is  an 
expression  of  the  self-consciousness  of  the  Church  with  respect  to  its  com- 
plete development.  From  this  is  derived  its  practical  necessity.  Whoever 
wishes  independently  to  direct  any  portion  of  the  Church,  must  participate 
in  this  self-consciousness,  or  he  will  neither  understand  its  present  position, 
nor  be  able  to  foresee  and  wisely  affect  its  future  course.  In  this  is  involved 
its  utility  for  controversial  and  spiritual  purposes,  or  for  the  assistance  of  oth- 
er sciences.  It  must,  however,  be  remembered,  that  when  the  value  and 
object  of  Church  history  are  too  exclusively  kept  in  view,  its  scientific  char- 
acter is  much  endangered. 

§  7.    Sources, 

F.  WalcK,  Erlt  Nacbr.  t.  d.  Qnellen  d.  KHist    (Lpz.  177a)    OGtt  1778. 

Our  certainty  with  regard  to  facts  must  depend  upon  the  sources:  1.  Ac- 
cording to  the  degree  of  their  proximity  to  the  particular  events  mentioned : 
a)  Original  documents  and  monuments^  which  prove  a  fact,  inasmuch  as  they 
constitute  an  element  in  it.  V)  Accounts  by  eye-witnesses  or  contemporaries. 
e)  Historical  writers^  who  draw  directly  from  sources  now  lost.  The  more 
remote  these  authorities  are  from  the  events  narrated,  the  more  is  their  credi- 
bility liable  to  criticism.  2.  According  to  the  form  in  which  they  exist :  a) 
Writings^  pablic  and  private,  without  a  uniform   preference  for  the  for- 


r 


4  INTRODUCTIOy.    CHAP.  L    PLAN. 

mer.  (a)  It  is  often  very  difficult  to  prove  that  a  witness  was  either  able  or  will- 
ing to  declare  the  whole  truth,  since  his  ability  is  often  affected  by  his  preju- 
dices, and  his  willingness  by  his  party  spirit.  5)  Monuments^  not  only  works  of 
art,  but  living  communities,  e)  Traditiom^  among  which  legends,  being 
merely  the  work  of  the  hierarchy,  prove  only  what  were  the  views  of  the 
age  in  which  they  originated,  or  were  completed ;  and  popular  stories  serve 
to  establish  an  historical  probability  in  proportion  as  they  are  widespread,  and 
conformed  to  circumstances  which  have  been  otherwise  historically  authenti- 
cated, ij))  A  thorough  investigation  of  sources  is  indispensable  only  to  the 
historical  \vriter.  (c) 

§  8.    Auxiliary  Sciences, 

The  auxiliary  sciences  usually  mentioned,  such  as  Ecclesiastical  Philolo- 
gy, (a)  Chronology,  (b)  Diplomatics,  (c)  Geography  and  Statbtics,  (d)  are  espe- 
daUy  necessary  only  to  the  ecclesiastical  historian.     But  General  History, 

a)  (a)  8.  OoncHiomm  hotb  et  unpllBsiina  collectio,  ear.  «/.  Dom,  Mantt^  Flor.  et  Yea.  175988.  81 
Tolft.  folio.  Canones  App.  et  OoncilL  Saeo.  4-7.  rec  ZT.  T.  Bruna^  Ber.  lS89flw  S  Th.  (BibL  Eccl  P.  I.) ; 
[Landon*a  Manual  of  Councils,  comprising  tb«  aubstanco  of  tlie  most  remarkable  and  important  ca- 
Bona,  Land.  1S46. 1  roL  12ma]  (fi)  Ballarinm  Roman.  Luxemb.  1727. 19  Tb.  f ;  Bnllaram  amplisa. 
ColL  op.  C.  Cocqudin€9^  Bom.  178988.  2S  vols,  t ;  Bullarlam  magnum  Bom.  (1768-1880)  op.  Andr. 
Avocati  Barharini^  Bom.  18858flb  8  Th.  t ;  Bom.  Bullarium,  a  Ansz&ge  d.  MerkwCLrdlgBten  BuIIen, 
fibers,  m.  Bemerk.  v.  EUeMchmidt,  Keuat  1S311  2  vols.;  Sammlung  aller  Concordato,  v.  S. 
Minch^  Lpz.  1S8011  2  vols,  (y)  Codex  liturgicus  EccL  Universao,  ill  J.  A.  Au^manus^  Bom. 
174988L  18  Th.  4.  (8)  Codex  regularum  Monaat  cd.  Lucas  UoUUniut,  Bom.  1661.  8  Tb.  4.  aux.  J/l 
Brockify  Aug.  Yind.  1759.  6  Th.  C  (f)  Maxima  Bibliotheca  vett  Patrom,  Lngd.  1677881  28  Th.  t; 
Bibl  vett  Patrum,  op.  And,  GttUandii,  Yen.  176588. 14  Th.  f. ;  oomp.  FabricU  BibL  gracca  ITamb. 
(170688. 14  Tb.)  ed.  IfarlesM,  17908&  12  Th.  4 ;  Schoenemann,  BibL  hist  literaria  Patmm  Lat  Lpz. 
179288.  2  Th.  (till  1475):  J.  O.  Walcfi,  BibL  patristica,  Jen.  IHO.  ed.  DanM^  1884;  B<mUr,  BibL  d. 
Kirchenvdter,  Lpz.  1776881  10  vols.;  AugutH^  Chrestomathia  patristica,  Lps.  1S12.  2  Th. ;  J.  O.  V. 
Engelhardi,  Lit  Leits.  z.  Yorles.  0.  d.  Patrlstlk.  Erl.  1828;  J.  N.  Locherer,  Lehrb.  d.  Patrologte, 
llainz,  1S87 ;  J.  A.  Mdhler,  PatroL  a  Christ  LlterargMoh.  edit  by  Betthmayr,  Ratisb.  184a  1  voL ; 
[Ubi  of  the  Fathers  of  the  H.  Cath.  Church  before  the  Division,  TransL  bj  EngL  Clergymen,  Oxfl 
1880.  26  vols,  a]  (()  SUie$  du  Pin,  Bibliothdque  dee  auteurs  ecclesiastiqnea  (Par.  16S6fla.  47  Th.) 
Amst  169088. 19  Th.  4.  and  BibL  des  auteurs  86par68  do  la  communion  de  T^glise  Bom.  Par.  171881 
8  Th. ;  comp.  Richard  Simon,  Critique  de  la  BibL  de  Mr.  dn  Pin,  Par.  1780.  4  Th. ;  Caw,  8cripto- 
mm  EocL  literaria  (Lond.  1689)  ed.  8  Oxon.  1740bb.  2  Th.  f ;  J:  ^.  Fabrieii,  BibL  EooL  Hamb.  1718. 
t  J^tud.  BibL  Latina  mediae  et  inflmae  aetaU^  Uamb.  1784m.  6  Th.  aux  Manti,  Palav.  1751  8  Th. 
4;  llist  Litt^ralre  de  U  France,  par  des  rellg.  B6n6dicUn8  de  &  Maur,  Par.  1788aa.  20  Tb.  4;  •/:  i& 
Awemani,  BibL  orientalls,  Bom.  1719S&  4  Th.  f  Bubm,  Orundr.  d.  Chr.  Lit  (tni  16th  cent), 
M&nst  1828,  2  vols,  h)  Acta  Sanctorum  quotquot  toto  orbe  coluntnr,  edd.  Jo.  BoUandus  aUlqae, 
Antv.  1648-1791  68  Th.  t  oomp.  De  proeocutione  operis  BoUandiani,  Namur,  1888;  Bonner  Zelt- 
schr.  t  PhiL  u.  Kath.  Th.  H.  17  dc  20 ;  Vogel,  Ocech.  o.  Wikrdigung  d.  Legende  (Illgen's  Hist  TheoL 
Abhh.  1824  voL  III.  p.  140aBw).  c)  SchUiermach«r,  DarstelL  des  TheoL  Studimus,  2  c<L  $  19011 
[Brief  Outline  of  the  Study  of  TheoL  Ac.  Trimslatcd  by  TTm.  Farrer,  yrith  Beminia.  of  S.  Edinb. 
1S50.  8.  S  181] 

a)  J.  O.  SuiofH,  TheflaTiras  eocL  e  patribns  graecis,  Amst  (1682)  1T28.  2  vols.  f. ;  C.  du  Frtms, 
Oloesarium  mediae  et  inflmae  grvedtada,  Logd.  1688.  9  vols,  f ;  Sffusd,  Q\om.  mediae  et  InC  latlnita- 
tis,  Par.  1783881  6  vols.  I  and  others;  {Adthtng)  Oloaei  manuale  ad  Scriptt  mediae  et  inC  latinitatis, 
Hal.  17728S.  6  Th.;  Glossaries  of  the  Germanic  and  Romanic  Languages;  [(?.  C.  Lewis,  Essay  on 
the  Origin  and  Formation  of  the  Bom.  Langg.  Oxford,  1840.  8w]  h)  Aerae:  ab  urbe  oondlta,  Seleud- 
daram,  BUspanica,  Diocletlana  sive  maityrum,  Constantinopolitana,  indictlonum,  Dionysiana,  comp^ 
L'Art  de  v6rifler  lee  dates  les  faita  historiquea,  par  un  rellg.  B^nMictln,  Par.  1760. 8  v<^  4.  nouv.  ed. 
par  Vitou  d6  &  Alois,  Par.  ISlSs.  28  Th. ;  Z.  JdOer,  Lehrb.  d.  ChronoL  BrL  1881 ;  E.  BHnck- 
meter,  Prakt  Handbnch  d.  Ilist  ChronoL  Lpz.  1840 ;  [R  Nicolas,  The  Chron.  of  Hist  2  ed.  Lond. 
184a  1  voL  8;  J,  Haydn,  Diet  of  Dates  to  All  AgM  and  Nations,  Lond.  1846;  J5foir*«  Chron.  and 


S  A.    DIYIBiON  INTO  PEBIODfi.  5 

the  history  of  Jnrispmdenoe,  and  the  history  of  Philosophy  and  of  Litera- 
ture, are  all  of  great  importance  as  preparatory  sciences  to  Church  History, 
since  they  present,  in  a  complete  form,  snhjects  whicli,  on  account  of  their 
individual  connection  with  the  Ghurch^  are  touched  upon  hut  slightly  in 
Church  history,  and  cannot  he  thoroughly  understood  except  in  their  com- 
plete relations. 

§  9.    Divuion, 

As  every  thing  in  a  progressive  state  must  he  regarded  in  an  order  of  suc- 
oession,  all  history  is  necessarily  arranged  according  to  time.  But  individual 
groups  of  things,  similar  in  nature,  and  connected  together  hy  causes  of  a 
more  definite  character  than  mere  temporal  contiguity,  are  often  found  spring- 
ing up  in  the  same  periods.  Hence,  the  arrangement  according  to  time^  must 
be  modified  hy  another  according  to  the  mlject.  The  division  according  to 
periods  aims  to  assign  some  definite  limits  for  the  scientific  view.  This  math- 
ematical division  hy  arhitrary  intersections  is  the  more  inadmissihle,  when 
the  lines  which  are  drawn  pass  through  some  event  which  constitutes  an 
epoch,  and  produces  a  thorough  transformation  of  the  Church.  The  essential 
developments  of  the  Christian  spirit  which  have  hitherto  heen  made,  are 
Catholicism  and  Protestantism ;  and  the  principal  organs  by  which  it  has 
acted,  have  heen  the  Greco-Roman  and  the  Germanic  national  spirit.  Accord- 
ingly, the  history  of  the  Church  is  naturally  divided  into  Three  Ages^  and  each 
of  these  into  Two  Period*.  I.  Ancient  Church  nietonj^  until  the  establishment 
of  the  holy  Roman  empire  among  the  Germanic  nations,  800 :  Greco-Roman 
civilization  in  the  ascendant,  but  gradually  declining,  partly  on  account  of  its 
own  weakness,  and  partly  because  lost  in  the  German  nationality.  The  Fir%t 
Period  extends  to  the  victory  of  the  Church  under  Constantine,  312 ;  Estab- 
lishment of  the  Church,  and  development  of  Catholicism  in  the  midst  of  tri- 
umphant conflicts  and  sufferings.  The  Second  Period  exhibits  the  Church,  on 
the  one  hand,  as  the  established  Church  of  the  empire,  attending  to  tlie  com- 
pletion and  establishment  of  her  faith,  and  on  the  other,  striving  to  allay  the 
storm  of  national  migrations.  H.  Mediated  Church  Ilistory^  until  the  Re- 
formation, 1517 :  sway  of  Romano-Germanic  Catholicism.  The  Third  Pe- 
riod extends  to  the  time  when  the  papal  despotism  attains  its  greatest  ascend- 
ency, under  Innocent  III.,  1216 :  victory  of  the  papacy  over  all  opposition. 
The  Fourth  Period  presents  us  with  the  gradual  decline  of  Catholicism,  and 
some  tokens  of  a  coming  reformation.    III.  Modern  Church  History  until  the 

Hl^  Tab1«s;  new  ed.  and  oont  to  the  present  time,  Lend.  1850.  8 ;  Oxford^  Chron.  Tables  of  An.  de 
Mod.  HIat  eont  to  1889.  OxC  1889.  t  and  HaU^9  New  Analyaia  of  Chron.  it  Oeo^  new  ed.  oor.  and 
Impi  Lond.  18801  4  Tola.  8;  HatiheiVi  Chron.  Yiew.  New  York.  1845] ;  F,  Piper,  Eirchenrochnunjir, 
BerL1841.  4;  [S.  F.  JantU^  Chron.  Introd.  to  Chnrch  Hist  New  York.  1850.8;  J.  K  RidJU, 
Eeelea.  Chron.  Lond.  1810.  &]  c)  J.  MabilUm,  do  re  diplomatfoa,  ed.  3.  Par.  1709.  t ;  Schonemann, 
YoIUtand.  System  d.  Allg.  Dlplomatlk.  Hamb.  1601.  2  vola. ;  [Diplomatica,  as  the  Germans  tiM  tliu 
word,  la  the  Seionoe  whioh  treats  of  diplomat,  4.  g.  Bulla,  Briefti,  Charters,  Patents,  Ac]  d)  Carofl 
a  &  Fttitla,  Oeograpbia  sacra  (Par.  1041.  t)  Amst  1701. 1 ;  F.  SpanAemii,  Qeogr.  sacra  et  occ  (0pp. 
Logd.  ITOL  1  Th.  C) ;  J,  E.  T.  Wilttch,  Ilandb.  d.  KlrchL  Oeogr.  a.  Btatist  bis  zn  anAing  d.  16  Jabrh. 
BrL  1846.  8  toIs.  ;  A.  W.  MTtlUr,  Hferographie,  Geach.  d.  K.  in  Landcharten,  Elberf.  1&22&S  2  Th.  £ ; 
J.RT.  Watseh,  Atlaa  saoer  s.  eoel  Goth.  1848.  t ;  St&ndlin,  KlrchL  Googr.  a.  Statiatik.  Tub.  1S04. 
8  Th. ;  </.  Wifffftrt,  Kirvhl.  Statistik.  Uamb.  1842a.  8  vols. 


6  UTTBODUCTION.    CHAP.  L    PLAN. 

present  time :  conflict  of  Protestantism  with  Catholicism.  The  Fifth  Period 
extends  to  the  peace  of  Westphalia,  1648 :  partial  victory  of  Protestantism, 
and  the  new  determination  of  Catholicism.  The  Sixth  Period  shows  ns  the 
conflict  hetween  ecclesiastical  usages  and  religious  independence.  The  prin- 
cipal articles  of  the  arrangement  according  to  subjects  are :  1)  The  territo- 
rial extension  of  the  Church ;  (a)  2)  The  constitution  of  the  Church,  and  its 
relation  to  the  State ;  {p)  8)  The  development  of  the  Christian  spirit,  with 
respect  to  doctrine  and  science ;  (c)  4)  The  popular  life  of  the  Church,  {d) 
and  the  system  of  public  worship,  {e)  But  this  mechanical  framework  is 
formed  only  very  gradually.  That  relation  is  always  to  be  made  most  promi- 
nent which  is  really  predominant  in  each  age.  Some  elements,  as,  e.  g,^  the 
Papacy  (/)  and  the  Monastic  Orders,  (g)  appear  as  independent  groups  only 
in  a  few  periods.  After  the  Reformation,  the  separate  Churches  form  essen- 
tial distinctions.  Every  Period,  then,  must  form  an  arrangement  out  of  its 
own  materials,  under  the  direction  of  no  other  law  than  that  which  requires 
a  vivid  picture  of  each  age,  derived  from  all  its  ecclesiastical  relations. 

a)  J.  A.  FabriciuSj  fialutaris  lux.  ev.  toti  orbi  exorions,  b.  notitia  propagatoram  chr.  sacrornm. 
Qamb.  1781.  4;  P.  C,  Gnitiantu^  \n.  e.  Gesch.  H.  Urspr.  n.  Fortpflanz.  d.  Cbiistenth.  In  Earopa, 
Tab.  176698.  2  Tb. ;  TT:  Brotim,  Ubt  of  the  Propag:  of  Cbii!»t  among  Ileatben  since  tbo  Udorm. 
Lond.  1S14.  2  vols. ;    C.  O.  BLumkardt,  Vrs.  e.  Allg.  MlflslonegeDcb.  Bas.  1S2S.  8  Th. :  J.  Wiggerit, 
Oeecb.  d.  Kvong.  Miss.  lS4Sa,  2  vols. ;   [C.  T.  Blutnhardt^  CbristiaD  Mls^lonSt  Tract  Soc  Lond.  \'<Vi. 
18;  J.  0.  ChouUs,  Orig.  and  Hist  of  Mlsslims,  Boston.  ISSS.  2  vols.  4;   //t/t>,  IIIsU  of  Chr.  MI&&loiif>, 
from  tho  KeC  to  tbe  Present  Time.  Edinb.  1S42.  12]    b)  Petnu  de  Ifarca,  Dss.  de  conconlla sacer- 
dotil  et  Imperii  s.  de.  libertatibos  Eccl  Gallic.  1.  VIIL  ed.  St,  BaUuiun,  Par.  1668.  f. ;  J.  //.  Bofhmrr, 
Lpa.  170S.  t;0.  J.  Hanck,  Gcj^rb.  d.  Kirclil  Gesell«chaftsverfass.  Uann.  1S08!W.  5  vols. ;  C.  Riffd^ 
Gescb.  I)ar»t  d.  Verb.  zw.  K.  a.  Stoat  Mainz.  1S86. 1  Th.  (till  JustinUn  I.) ;    Thamassini,  Vetus  ct 
nova  Eccl.  dl^cipllna  circa  beneficia.  Luc  172sS.  8  Tb.  f. ;  XicAeriL,  Hist-  Cone,  generalfnm.  Colon.  ICSO. 
«Tb.  4;  F.  Wdlch^  Entxr.  e.  vollst  Hist  d.  KVcts.  Lpt  1769;  Slavdenmaier,  Gesch.  d.  BLschofi- 
wablen.  TQb.  1830:   J.  Ant.  u.  Ai*g.  Tkeiner,  Die  EioMlir.  d.  erzwang.  Ebelosigk.  d.  Qeistl.  Altenb. 
1828.  (new  Ut  1S4S.)  8  vola.    c)  C.  W,  Flugge,  Gescb.  d.  TbeoL  Wb«en»ch.  (till  the  Bef.)  llal.  KPCaa. 
8  vok ;  K.  F.  Stdudlin,  Ges-b,  d.  TheoL  Wiss.  seit  Vorbreltung  der  alton  Llteratnr.  Gr>tt  ISia  t 
2  voUk :  F.  Walch,  Yollst  Hist  d.  Ketxereien  (till  the  image  controv.)  Lpz.  1762s8. 11  vol& ;  D.  Ptta- 
viu*^  Opus  de  theol.  dogmatibas  (Par.  1644fis.  4  vols,  f.)  ed.  7%.  AUthinut  {CUricua),  Antv.  (Ainst) 
1700.  6  Tb.  C ;  If.  Kl«^,  Lebrb.  d.  DGescb.  Mainz.  188788.  2  vols.;  W.  Munacher,  Handb.  d.  DOesch. 
(UIl    1604.)  Marb.  179788.  4  vols.  ed.  8  voU    I.-III.   lS17s.;    Ibid.  Lebrb.  d.  DGesch.  (1811- 
1819.)  m.  Belegen  u.  d.  Quellen  von  D.  p.  Colin.  Cam.  1882m.  1^2  HQlfte,  1  Abtb.  FortiE-  v.  Neu- 
decker,  2  Abtb.  1S8S;  AugwiU  Lebrb.  d.  DGescb.  Lpz.  (180&  1811.  18(20.)  1885;  Banmgarten  Cm- 
•^  Lebrb.  d.  DGescb.  Jen.  1882;  2  Abtb.  n.  Comp.  d.  DQeseb.  Lpz.  1S40-46.  2  Th.\  J.  G.   V. 
JTfi^tfMareft,  DGescb.  Neust  1S39.  2  vols.;   F.  K.  Meier,  Lebrb.  d.  DGescb.  Gfe.%.  1S40;  K.  li. 
Ilagenbachy  Lebrb.  d.  DGescb.  Lpz.  1S40-41.  2  Tb.;  F.  CK  Banr,  Lebrb.  d.  DGescb.  Stuttg. 
1847;  Th.  Kli^oth,  Elnl.  In  d.  DGescb.  Parcbim.  1S89 ;   [A  Transhitlon  of  tbe  Doctrinal  Hlatory  of 
Mueneeher^  bas  been  published  by  Dr.  Murdoch.  New  Haven.  1880.  12 :   A  Transl.ntion  of  Hagen- 
baeh'a  Doct  Hist  by  C.  W.  Buck,  was  published  In  Clarke's  Ed.  For.  Tbeol.  Lib.  1846.  2  vols.  12.J 
d)  AcU  Sanctorum  ($  7  nt  b.)  Staudlin,  Gescb.  der  Bittenlebre  Jesn.  Gutt  1799.  1828.  (till  1299.)  4 
vols.  n.  Gescb.  d.  Cbr.  Moral  a.  d.  WicderanlL  d.  Wise.  Gott  1808;  J.  G.  MkUer^  Reliquien  alter 
Zeiten.  Lpz.  18088s.  4  vols. ;  Neander^  Denkwilrdigkelten   ans   der  Gescb.  dee  (Jbristentb.  .und 
Cbri»tl.  Lcbens.  Brl.  (1S2S8S.)  18258.  8  vols.    0)  E.  Marteif^  de  antiqnia  Eccl.  ritibua,  ed.  &  Antv. 
1786si<.  4  Tb.  £ ;  A.  A.  Pettioeia,  do  Cbr.  EocL  primaA,  mediae  et  novisa.  politia.  (Neapi  1777.  Yen. 
1782.  8  Tb.)  edd.  Pitter  et  Sraun.  Col.  1629-8a  8  Th.  revised  by  Binterim.  Mainz.  1825sa.  7  Th. 
in  17  vols.;  I/Kherer^  Lebil).  d.  Cbr.  ArcbiioL  FrankC  1882;  J.  Bingham^  Origines  &  antiquitates 
ecc.  ex.  Angl.  (Antiquities  of  tiie  Church,  [Lond.  new  ed.  1846.  2  voK]  and  otber^)  lit  red*  OriM- 
chovius.  Hal.  (172488.)  175289.  11  Tb.  4;  F.  J7.  BMnwald,  KircbL  Arcb.  BrL  1880;  Augiisti, 
Handb.  d.  Cbr.  Arch.  Au»ng,  a.  d.  DenkwOrdigkk.  (18178&  12  vols.)  Lpx.  1886s.  8  vols. ;  C.  C.  F. 
Siegel,  Handb.  d.  QiristL  AlUicrtbQmer,  In  Alpbab.  Ordn.  Lpz.  183688.  4  vols. ;    W.  Bohnter,  Cbr. 
Kircbl.  Altbertbumswlss.  Bro&L  1886-9.  2  voliw ;  [J.  R  Riddle,  Man.  of  Cbr.  Autb.  Lond.  1886.  8;  L, 
Coleman,  Autt  of  tbe  Cbr.  Church,  transl.  and  comp.  fh»n  AugwAL  And.  1841.  &] 


Sia    FLACIUS.    nOTTINGEE.    BASONIUS. 


CHAP.  II.— GENERAL  LITERATURE. 

Stdudlin,  Qoseb.  a.  Litentur  d.  EGcsch.  edit  hy  Hemsen.  Hann.  1827.     [K  B.  SagehlKicK, 
EnexkL  u.  Methodologie  der  TheoL  Win.  8  ed.  p.  224  Lpz.  1851.  8.] 

§  10.    Polemical  Church  History, 

A  general  Chnrch  History  could  not  be  reasonably  expected,  until  the 
Chnrch  was  sufficiently  extended  to  embrace  a  large  family  of  nations.  It 
was  not,  in  &ct,  written  nntil  the  Ohnrch  had  become  divided  and  the  newly 
organized  party  felt  the  necessity  of  connecting  itself  with  antiquity,  and  of  dis- 
turbing the  historical  basis  of  the  Oatholic  Church.  Such  was  the  object  of 
Matthias  Flatus  Ulyricus^  when  he  edited  the  Magdeburg  Centuries,  (a)  in 
which  was  enlisted  all  the  Protestant  learning  of  the  age.  It  was  distin- 
guished for  its  familiarity  with  original  authorities,  for  its  frequent  citations, 
for  a  criticism  which  paid  no  deference  to  earlier  writers  on  the  same  subject, 
and  for  its  passionate  style  of  controversy.  For  more  than  a  century  after- 
wards, nothing  was  published  but  text-books  formed  from  the  materials  sup- 
plied by  the  Centuries,  and  written  in  the  same  spirit.  In  the  Reformed 
Churches,  the  elementary  studies  of  literary  men  were  turned  principally  to 
individual  portions  of  the  general  subject  to  refute  some  particular  assertions 
of  the  Catholic  writers.  J.  H.  Hottinger  was  anxious  to  compose  for  his 
Church  a  work  (&)  of  a  partisan  character  like  that  of  the  Centuries,  but  his 
History,  except  in  whatever  relates  to  the  Oriental  and  Helvetic  Churches, 
indicates  a  limited  knowledge  of  original  authorities,  and  is  mingled  with 
much  irrelevant  matter.  Spanheiin's  Church  History  (c)  presents  a  very  rigid 
investigation  of  historical  questions,  but  it  was  principally  aimed  against 
Baronius.  The  Catholic  Church  soon  perceived  that  very  little  advantage 
was  to  be  gained  by  merely  contending  against  the  Centuries,  and  that  it 
must  supplant  that  work  by  another  of  a  superior  character.  Intrusted  with 
such  a  task,  CcRsar  Baronius  wrote  his  Annals  (cT),  in  which  were  incorporated 
vast  treasures  of  original  documents,  selected  with  a  keen  sagacity  and  zeal 


f)  E.  S,  Cyprian^  t.  Uraprnng  n.  Wacbsthum  d.  Papsth.  Goth.  1719.  and  often.  Frk£  1788 ;  A. 
Bower^  Hist  of  the  Popes  to  175a  (cont  hy  S.  IT.  Coft,  8  vols.  8vo.  Pbilad.  I&IO) ;  F.  Walch^  £ntw.  e. 
Vollst  Illst  d.  Papste.  Lpx.  (175e.)  1768 ;  L.  T.  SpiUer,  Oescb.  d.  Papstth.  edit  by  GurlUt  u.  Paulus. 
Hdlh.  182ft;  •;:  A.  Ltorenie^  Gesch.  d.  Pupste,  a.  d.  Fr.  Lpz.  1828.  2  vols. ;  C.  J.  Wieher,  Papstth.  n. 
Papsie.  Stottg.  1884.  2  Th.  [J.  Ranhe^  Hist  of  the  Popes,  transl.  by  Mr$.  Aiutin.  8  vols.  8vo.  Lond. 
l&IO.  and  by  W.  JT.  KtUy.  Pbilad.  1848.  8 ;  D«  Cormenin,  Hist  of  the  Popes.  Pbilad.  1845. 1  vol  8.] 

9)  R,  Bb9piniani  de  moDachls  L  VL  (Tig.  1588.  IGOa)  Gen.  1699.  f. ;  A.  D.  AUeaerrae,  Ascetlcon 
s.  Origg.  rei  Monast  (Par.  Ift74.  4.)  rec  Gluck,  Hal.  1782 ;  U,  Uelyoiy  Hist  dcs  Ordres  Monast]qae^ 
Par.  (17148*.  8  Th.)  182988.  10  Th.  4;  Gulnc.  1840.  6  Th.;  Ubor.  Lpx.  17588s.  8  Tb.  revised  by 
Cmme.  Pragm.  Gesch.  d.  Monchsord.  Lpt  177488. 10  vols. ;  {€.  J.  Wehef)  Die  Miincberei.  Stuttg. 
lS199u  8  vols. ;  K  MUnch,  Oescb.  d.  M5nchtb.  (a  collection  of  materialR)  Stnttg.  182a  2  vols. ;  [8.  P. 
Day,  Monastic  Institotions,  their  Grig.  Prog.  Nat  and  Tendency.  Lond.  2  ed.  12mo.  1846 ;  G.  Emtt- 
Uanne,  Hist  of  Monast  Grden^  Lond.  1693.  a] 

o)  Eoclefiiasticm  Historia,  Integram  Ecclesiae  Cb.  Ideam  complectens,  congcsta  per  aliquot  stndio- 
Boa  et  plos  vlroe  in  nrbe  Magdeborgica.  Ba^  1559-74. 18  centuries,  t ;  New  ed.  by  BaumgarUn  and 
SemUr  NOmb,  1757-65.  broken  off  with  the  6tb  vol.  b)  Historla  Eccl.  N.  T.  Tig.  1651-67.  9  vols, 
tm  end  of  16th  eent  the  9th  vol.  by  J.  J,  JTotUnger^  the  son.  c)  Summa  Histori.i6  eccl.  (Lugd. 
168IM4.)  Lpx.  10981  4.  [His  work  is  abridged  and  transl  with  additions  by  G.  Wi-ight  Lond.  6to. 
1829.]    d)  Annakb  ccdeafawUd  a  a  n.  ad  a.  119a  Bom.  1588-1607. 12  Th.  t  and  often. 


r 


8  INTRODUCTION.    CHAP.  IL    LTTSRATUBB. 

in  behalf  of  the  Roman  supremacy,  fh)m  the  archives  of  the  Vatican.  The 
errors  and  partialities  of  the  Cardinal  were  encountered  by  the  critical  labors 
of  the  Franciscan  Fagi^  in  which  were  exhibited  a  learned  love  of  truth  and 
a  Galilean  attachment  to  liberty,  (e)  In  Italy  numerouB  continuations  and 
abridgments  of  the  Annals  were  produced,  in  the  same  spirit  which  the  orig- 
inal author  had  displayed,  but  not  with  equal  talent.  The  continuation  by 
Raynaldus  [till  1565]  is  the  only  work,  which,  in  its  abundance  of  materials, 
can  be  regarded  as  nearly  a  rival  of  that  which  precedes  it.(/)  A  similar  hon- 
or was  sought  by  Sachnrelli^  (g)  in  opposition  to  the  later  historians  of  the 
Protestant  Church,  and  in  the  composition  of  his  work  he  possessed  similar 
external  advantages,  but  he  displays  hardly  equal  diligence  in  the  use  of  them 
except  in  his  earliest  volumes. 

§  11.  French  Eeclesiastieal  ffistarians. 

Catholic  writers  of  history  are  always  restrained  by  a  certain  prescribed  mode 
of  treating  their  subject,  but,  within  the  limits  required  by  this,  those  who  be- 
longed to  the  French  school  attained  a  scientific  character.  The  peculiar  quali- 
ties exhibited  by  them  were  the  result  not  merely  of  the  independent  spirit  and 
position  of  the  Gallican  Church,  but  of  the  influence  of  an  age  in  which  the 
learned  classes  redeemed  from  obscurity  immense  collections  of  materials.  Such 
was  the  spirit  in  which  wrote  the  Dominican  NatalU  Alexander  [Noel],  always 
learned,  dry,  and  scholastic ;  {a)  Fleury^  the  hermit  in  the  midst  of  a  court, 
devotional,  gentle,  versatile  and  copious.  (1>)  Bosmet^  whose  History  of  the 
World  is  written  in  an  ecclesiastical  spirit,  with  logical  eloquence,  and  an  ap- 
parent insight  into  the  ways  of  Providence,  which  implies  that  the  clever 
Bishop  of  Meaux  must  have  been  as  familiar  with  the  court  of  the  Most  Iligh, 
as  he  was  with  that  of  his  sovereign ;  {c)  and  finally  the  Jansenist  (Sebastian 
le  Nain  de)  Tilleinont^  whose  Memoirs  are  a  conscientious  and  ample  collec- 
tion of  the  more  ancient  original  authorities,  {d) 

§  12,    ProUHant  Scientific  Church  Hiitory, 

Instead  of  regarding  history  as  a  mere  instrument  in  the  hands  of  eccle- 
nastical  disputants,  CalixtuSy  in  a  series  of  monographs,  pointed  out  the  sci- 
entific advantages  of  an  unbiassed  investigation  of  facts ;  and  Arnold  was  en- 


«)  Crttica  htstArioo-cfaronologica  in  Annates  BaroniL  Anty.  (Qonev.)  170&  1727.  4  Th.  £  /)  An- 
nales  eccl  18-21  Th.  Horn.  l(m-1X.  Colon.  1698m.  ;  the  whole  collection  bj  Baroniiu,  Pagl,  Kay- 
naldiu,  etc  cur.  MarutL  La&  178i^u59.  88  Th.  t  [The  Annales  EocL  are  to  be  continaed  bj  Aui/. 
Theiner,  from  1572  till  now ;  8  toIiw  have  appeared  in  IS&a.  Some.  1858.  £]  g)  Hiatoria  eocL  Som. 
17n-Mw  26  Th.  4.  (till  118S.) 

a)  Selecta  Historlae  eccl.  capita  et  in  loca  ^nsdem  Insignia  dl«.  hintorioae,  chron.  et  dogm.  Par. 
1876-S6.  24  Th.  (1ft  contaries).  I.ator  editlona:  Hist  ccel.  Yet  et  N.  T.  ed.  ManH.  Luc.  178S.  0  Th. 
t ;  Bassano.  177a  9  Th.  f  2*)  Uist  eccleeiastiqae.  Par.  li»l-1720.  20  Th.  4.  and  often  (till  1414.) 
transl.  into  the  Lat  ItaL  and  Oerm.  continnod,  without  suitable  qualifications  for  the  work,  by 
Jsan  Claud  Fabre.  Par.  172«-40.  20  Th.  4.  and  by  Alex.  La  Croiae.  Par.  177ft-7a  ft  Th.  [The  work 
of  Fleury  Is  in  part  transl.  into  Eng.  in  6  vols.  4.  and  is  in  coune  of  pubL  by  J.  IT.  yeoman.  Oxon. 
1848.]  e)  DIscoars  sur  rilistoire  unlverselle  depuls  le  oommenoemont  dn  monde  Jnsqu'4  Tempire  da 
Charles  Magne;  [Par.  184ft.  18moi  and  in  2  mag.  ytAa.  8.  transl  by  Mch.  Spencer.  Lond.  1780.  &] 
d)  M^moires  pour  ser^ir  k  i'llist  eccl.  dos  six  pr6inlen sltelea,  Justiflte  par  lea dtationa  des  aatean 
orlginauz.  Par.  189888. 1ft  Th.  4.  and  often. 


S  tk    SSHLBB.    8CHB0ECKH.    HKNKS.  9 

oooraged  by  his  Pietum,  and  a  strong  predilection  for  sach  studies,  to  search 
eagerly  for  traces  of  the  Ohristian  life  In  those  persons  who  had  in  each  cen- 
tury been  r^ected  by  the  Ohnroh.  (a)  The  liberal  tendency  of  the  former,  and 
the  pioos  spirit  of  the  hitter  writer,  were  equally  opposed  to  the  established 
Ohnrch  of  their  day.  Weumann^s  gentle  love  of  tmth,  made  him  strive  to  re* 
condle  both  these  tendencies  in  his  selection  of  important  events,  (h)  Mo^ 
theim,  conscious  of  historical  talents,  with  a  power  of  combination  always 
bold,  and  sometimes  extravagant,  and  an  acquaintance  with  men  in  various 
and  friendly  relations,  is  universally  acknowledged  to  have  been  a  master  of 
ecclesiastical  historical  writing.  ((?)  Next  to  him,  Cramer  was  distingubhed  for 
his  accurate  delineation  and  careful  investigation  of  the  dogmatic  history  of 
the  middle  ages,  (d)  while  Semler^  with  no  attractions  of  style,  and  no  per- 
ception of  the  peculiar  condition  of  earlier  times,  but  with  a  lofty  indepen- 
dence, was  always  plunging  anew  into  the  trackless  abyss  of  ancient  sources,  (e) 
In  the  position  thus  acquired,  but  with  a  more  believing  spirit,  Schrockh  has 
written  a  Ohurch  History,  which,  after  it  ceased  to  be  a  tedious  Reader,  as  it 
seemed  to  be  in  the  earlier  volumes,  and  rose  to  the  dignity  of  a  scientific 
work,  is  equally  trustworthy  with  respect  to  its  materials,  and  ample  in  its 
details.  The  last  volumes  were  added  by  Tzsehimer^  with  a  fresher  energy, 
and  more  decided  sentiments.  (/)  Writers  of  a  liberal  tendency  followed  the 
path  marked  out  by  Semler.  SpittUr  gave  to  Church  History  a  more  anima- 
ted and  secular  aspect,  and  at  the  same  time  traced  more  perfectly  its  con- 
nections with  General  History,  (g)  Henlce  treated  it  rather  as  if  it  were  a 
history  of  religious  errors,  and  a  court  before  which  was  to  be  arraigned  all 
kinds  of  spiritual  despotism.  When  writing  of  events  subsequent  to  the  Re- 
formation, his  work  is  especially  valuable  for  its  accurate  regard  for  even  un- 
important matters ;  but  it  is  often  lifeless,  and  tinged  with  the  strongest  pre- 
judices of  his  age.  (A)  As  soon  as  the  opposition  to  the  ecclesiastical  spirit 
of  earlier  times  had  become  developed  into  a  well-defined  subjectivity,  a 
hi^er  scientific  character  was  supposed  to  be  attained  by  the  affectation  of 
extreme  indifference.  Schmidt  collected  materials  exclusively  from  the 
sources.  {%)    Engelhardt  gives  us  a  clear,  calm,  and  frigid  account  of  the  na- 


a)  Unpavtbeyisebe  Klrohen-  u.  Eetxer-Hlst  (FrU  10O9&  t  1729.  4  Th.  4)  Bchaffh.  1740H.  8 
Tta.  t  h)  Introdoetio  in  memonbilla  eccL  nuudme  Saeculornm  primornm  et  novlsslinoniin  (Tub.  1718. 
8  Tok.)  Hal  1740.  8  Tola.  4.  c)  nia  prinefpal  complete  work  ia,  InstltnUonmn  Hist  ecct.  antlqaae 
et  reeenttorlN  L  lY.  Helmst  (17QS.  4.)  1764  4;  Ubem  n.  venn.  ▼.  J.  v.  Einem.  Lpi.  1768-78.  9  voUl 
and  bj  J.  R.  SchUff^  Uellbr.  (1  4e  8  toIh  1770a)  17868&  7  vola. ;  comp.  Liicks,  Narratio  de  J.  "U 
Moabemlo.  Outt  1887.  4;  [TranaL  into  Eng.  wltb  notes,  hyJ.  Murdoch,  New  York.  8  vela.  8vo.  8 
«d.  134L  and  by  A,  MeLaine^  with  notea,  and  often  reprinted;  his  Commcntarll  de  reb.  Chr.  ante 
Oonat  ban  been  reoentlj  traasL  into  Engl  bj  Dr.  MurdockJ]  d)  Bowu^Ca  EinL  In  d.  Oeaeb.  d. 
W^t  o.  BeL  ftbera.  init  Abbandl.  Term.  n.  fortgea.  t.  OrafMr.  Lpi.  (174888.)  175786.  8  Tolai 
4)  HIatoriae  eod.  soleeta  capita.  HaL  1767n.  8  Tb. ;  Yenraebe  e.  fruchtbi  Ansa.  d.  KGescb.  HaL 
177aBa.  8  Th. ;  Yen.  GbriatL  Jahrb.  HaL  1788.  8  Tol8.  /)  ChristL  KOeach.  (till  the  Keibrm.)  Lpx. 
1768-1808. 86  Th.  8  ed.  1-18  Tolaw  in8-1803 ;  KOeech.  since  the  Bef.  Lpx.  1804-10. 10  Tb.  g)  Grand- 
ilflB  der  Geeeb.  d.  Chrlatl.  Kirche.  Gdtt  1782.  6  ed.  cont  till  the  present  time  by  O, «/.  Planck^ 
GtML  1812 ;  in  SpUtter't  works.  Stuttg.  1827.  toL  II.  h)  Allg.  Gescb.  d.  Chr.  Kircbe  nach  d.  Zelt- 
folga.  Braonachw.  1788-161&  8  Tola.  0  ed.  of  Ist  as  8d  toIs.  4  ed.  of  8d  A;  4th  Tola,  and  2  ed.  of  Otb 
4  6cb  Tola. ;  the  laat  ed.  of  Tola.  !».  6s.  after  a  eareftU  roTialon  (so  as  cTen  to  lose  many  of  ita  origi- 
nal peeaMarttlee),  edited  and  oont  (7th  St  Sth  to1&)  hjj:&  VaUr,  The  Hiat  since  tbe  Befbrm.  toUl 
S-8L  Vaisr  hm  also  oompriaad  in  1  Th.  (1828.)  and  pnbllsbed  as  Th.  9.    0  Handb.  d.  Chr.  KGesoh. 


# 


10  INTRODUCTION.    CHAP.  IL    LITERATUBE. 

ked  facts,  and  he  often  descends  to  the  minnteet  partionhurs.  (I-)  The  publi- 
cation of  the  original  authorities,  which  had  been  cautiously  commenced  with 
a  profusion  of  literary  treasures  by  Dam^  (l)  was  continued  by  Oieuler^  with 
much  judgment  m  his  selections  and  in  his  critical  remarks,  and  a  running 
commentary  upon  his  citations,  (m)  Sometimes  Tables,  and  well  digested  ex- 
tracts, are  useful  in  giving  a  general  view  of  the  whole  field,  (n)  Stdudlin*s 
Text-Book  is  a  convenient  collection  of  general  facts,  with  a  few  traces  of 
the  Kantian  philosophy.  Narhe's  was  compiled  with  diligence,  and  not  with- 
out elegance,  but  it  is  without  accuracy  or  character.  Augu9t€$  is  a  rapid 
and  convenient  survey  of  the  whole  subject,  especially  of  that  part  which 
relates  to  the  Reformation.  RehnCi  is  an  extended  table  of  contents,  espe- 
cially with  respect  to  the  secular  department  of  ecclesiastical  history. 
Lange'i  is  a  return  to  the  Protestant  controversial  style  of  writing,  but  with 
a  laxer  faith  in  the  authority  of  the  Bible  and  of  human  reason  itself,  {o) 
The  attempt  which  Marheineehe  made  to  construct  a  philosophical  system  of 
Church  History  was  abandoned  at  an  early  stage  of  the  work,  but  it  was  full 
of  promise,  (p)  The  decidedly  pietUtic  tendency  was  for  a  long  time  repre- 
sented only  by  Milner^  whose  object  was  entirely  practical  and  devotional 
and  did  not  lead  him  to  study  the  sources,  (g)  until  Neander  gave  it  a  scien- 
tific character,  by  referring  to  the  original  authorities,  developing  its  doc- 
trines in  an  intelligent  manner,  and  giving  prominence  to  the  long-neglected 
representations  of  the  Christian  life.  Though  afifectionately  attached  to  the 
Church,  he  was  tolerant  toward  all  who  opposed  it  on  merely  doctrinal 
grounds,  and  clothed  all  his  descriptions  with  an  ample  devotional  drapery.(r) 
In  these  respects,  as  well  as  in  others,  the  Church  History  of  Gueriche  is  only 
a  dependent  abstract  of  his  work,  characterized  by  the  same  Christian  sin- 
cerity, but  with  a  zeal  so  ardent  for  strict  Lutheranism,  that  it  finally  became 
little  more  than  a  severe  lecture  upon  the  apostasies  of  more  recent  times.  (») 
In  the  Reformed  Church,  Jaech  Bcunage  still  pursued  the  plan  of  repelling  Bos- 
Buet^s  reproaches,  by  fastening  them  upon  his  opponent's  own  Church ;  but 
he  has  imitated  too  closely  the  models  which  he  had  chosen  from  the  French 


OiMS.  1801-80.  6  Th.  2  ed.  1-4  Th.  1S25-S7.  (tlU  Innocent  IIL)  cont  by  F.  W.  Rsttberg,  7  Th.  GiesB. 
ISai  k)  Handb.  d.  KGMcb.  ErL  18888.  4  Tola.  I)  Lebrbi  d.  KGesch.  Jena.  181S-8«.  9  vola. ; 
KorxgeH  Zusaoimenst  d.  KOesch.  Jena.  1824.  m)  Lehrb.  d.  KQesch.  Bonn.  1824-40.  2  vola.  and 
8  TolflL ;  1  Abth.  (Ull  164a)  4  od.  of  lat  toL  ;  1  A  2  Abtb.  1&I4&  8  ed.  of  2d  vol ;  1  dc  2  Abtb. 
ISSlB.;  [transL  In  8  vola.  by  &  Davidson,  Edinb.  1846-68.]  n)  VaUr,  Syncbron.  Tabellen  d. 
KOeach.  HaL  (1808.)  oont  by  J.  C  ThUo,  6  ed.  Hal.  188a  £ ;  T«tans  HaldL,  Hist  eccL  YI.  prlorom 
Saee.  tynoptice  enarraU.  Havn.  1880;  Medli  aevl  (604-858.)  P.  1. 1882.  A\  J.  T,  L.  Daw,  Klrcben- 
hiat  Tab.  Jena.  188a  t ;  C  Wahl^  KOesch.  in  Blldern,  fur  Stndlrende  n.  Candidaten.  Meiasen. 
1840.  t ;  (AmoseDients)  2^  Langs,  Tab.  d.  E-.  o.  DGeecb.  Jena.  1341.  4 ;  J.  M.  Schroeckh,  Hist  re* 
Uglonls  et  cccL  Cbriat  Her.  1777.  ed.  7.  cor.  MarMnecke,  1S28 ;  J.  G.  C.  Schmidt,  Lehrb.  d.  KGescb. 
Glasa.  (180a  ISOa)  182&  o)  Sidudlin,  UniTeraalgeach.  der  Cbr.  Kircbe.  Uan.  1S07.  ft.  verb.  n.  fortgea. 
A.  T.  F.  A.  Holthauten,  1888;  F.  A,  Natb€,  Ck)Dip.  Uiat  Ecol.  ac  aacroram  Christ  Lfia.  1S82 ;  Au- 
IfuttH,  Hist  ecc  Epitome.  Lpz.  1884;  F.  Rthm,  Gmndr.  d.  Geech.  d.  Kircbe,  mit  bee.  R&cksw  ant  d. 
YerflMflL  dera.  Harb.  1885 ;  Lobeg.  Langs,  Lehrb.  d.  Chr.  RGescb.  znr  Vertheid.  Befest  n.  Fort- 
btld.  d.  Prot  Kircbe.  Lpz.  1846.  p)  Univeraal-Kirchenhljit  d.  Christenth.  Erlang.  1806.  1  Tb. 
q)  [Hist  of  the  (^orch  of  Christ  Lond.  6  vols.  8vo.  1824.  4  vols,  a  1884.  with  a  continuation  by  J. 
BooU.  Lond.  1S26.  4  vola.  12;  Pbllad.  2  vola.  12.  1845.]  r)  Allg.  Geech.  d.  Chr.  Bel  n.  K.  bis  auf 
Bonl&s  YIIL  10  vola.  Hamb.  1846;  [Gen.  Hist  of  the  Ohr.  EeL  and  Church,  trausL  by  J.  Torrty, 
4  Toll.  8va  Beaton.  1847-l^t]    «)  Handb.  d.  KGeech.  HaL  (1888-46^  8  vola.)  8  vola.;  Abrisa  d. 


S  12^    VEXEMA.    SCULEIERMACIIEB.    $  18w    BTOLBEBQ.  1 1 

literature  of  his  time.  (/)  VenemcC%  Charch  History  is  simply  an  excellent 
ooUection  of  original  aathorities.  {u)  A  few  compendiums  contain  all  the  re- 
salts  of  the  studies  in  ecclesiastical  history,  so  far  as  these  had  been  attained 
when  they  were  respectively  written.  That  of  Royaard  especially  was  writ- 
ten with  remarkable  accuracy  and  care,  (r)  Schleiermacher,  in  his  oral  com- 
monications,  endeavored  to  effect  a  union  of  the  liberal  and  pietistic  tenden- 
cies, and  has  executed  in  a  rather  fragmentary  manner,  a  plan,  in  which,  the 
ordinary  materials  being  presupposed,  is  represented  the  intensive  and  exten- 
sive development  of  the  new  principle  of  divine  life  which  emanated  from 
Christ.  Of)  Ni4idner  has  contributed,  in  addition  to  this,  a  work  which  is 
something  between  a  text-book  and  a  manual,  presenting  not  merely  a  dry  col- 
lection of  thoughts,  but  an  abundance  of  elementary  views  of  individual 
subjects,  (f)  Among  the  histories  adapted  to  popular  use,  {y)  may  be  men- 
tioned the  work  of  Ofrdrer^  which  was  at  first  designed  to  be  a  history  for 
the  German  people ;  but  it  finally  became  an  ample  representation  of  the 
subject,  and  generally  depended  for  its  materials  upon  the  best  authorities. 
The  strongly  marked  peculiarity  of  this  work,  sometimes  in  a  paradoxical 
manner,  but  frequently  with  much  good  sense,  breaks  through  the  devotional 
phrases  even  of  his  authorities,  (z) 

§  13.     WriterB  of  the  German  Catholic  Church. 

It  was  not  until  Joseph  II.  attempted  to  draw  away  the  German  Church 
from  its  connection  with  Rome,  that  an  independent  and  liberal,  but  rather 
rash  and  contracted  interest  in  the  ecclesiastical  affairs  of  previous  times, 
began  to  be  cultivated  in  Germany.  In  the  commencement  of  this  movement, 
BoykOj  in  his  rough  style,  neglected  nothing  which  could  injure  the  hier- 
archy, (a)  Dannenmayr^  with  more  caution,  and  more  general  views,  pre- 
pared a  text-book  for  the  Austrian  schools,  (b)  and  R,  WolfBi&Di  forth  what  de- 
serves to  be  called  a  satire  rather  than  a  history,  (c)  A  movement  of  a  higher 
order  received  its  original  impulse  from  the  Protestant  Church.  Stolherg^ 
with  the  zeal,  the  unction,  and  the  unconditional  faith  of  a  proselyte,  but 
with  a  benevolent  and  glowing  spirit,  has  presented  the  more  benign  aspect 
of  Catholicism,  while  writing  and  singing  the  History  of  the  Jewish  people, 

EQesch.  Hal.  1842.  0  Hiatoire  de  Peglise  depuis  Jcsns  Chr.  Rotterd.  1600;  [Par.  1725.  2  vola.  4] 
tt)  InatltaUonee  Htst  eccl.  V.  et  N.  Logd.  ITTTsa.  7  Th.  4.  UU  IftOO.  v)  J.  A.  Turretini,  Hist  EooL 
comp.  mque  ad.  a.  1700.  Gen.  1784.  ed.  et  continuavtt  J.  Simonla,  Hal.  1750 ;  Uobera.  a.  fortgefk  T. 
Tmner.  KonigMb.  1759 ;  P.  K  Jahlon*ki,  Institt  Hist  christ  FrcC  ad  Y.  17588&  2  Th.  ed.  & 
emend.  K  A.  Schulze.  1788s.  Tb.  IIL ;  Historiam  Saec  18.  add.  Stotch.  1767;  emend.  Schidbedan»f 
17S6;  W.  MiMcher,  Lehrb.  d.  KOescb.  Marb.  1804;  2d  ed.  by  WachUr,  1815;  8d  ed.  hj  Beckham, 
1826 ;  P.  UofgUde  de  Groot,  Institt  Hist  ecc  Gronov.  1S85 ;  Jl  J.  Poj/aarda^  Comp,  Hist  eca 
chr.  Tn^.  ad.  Bh.  1840-6.  2  Fasc.  it)  Gcsch.  d.  Chr.  Kirche,  edit  by  BonneU.  Brl.  1810 ;  (Worlu^ 
Abth.  L  Tol.  II.)  cr)  Gesch.  d.  Chr.  Klrche,  Lehrbnch.  Lpz.  1846.  y)  Especially :  C.  Judd,  Gesch. 
d.  Chr.  Klrche.  BrL  1S38 ;  ff.  Thiele,  Karze  Gesch.  d.  Chr.  Kirche.  Zur.  1S40 ;  Atb.JBaur,  d.  KGesch. 
in  gedriingter  Uberslcht  Weim.  1846 ;  Heribert  liau,  Allg.  Gesch.  d.  Chr.  Kirche  (deutschkath.). 
FQr  das  deatscho  Volk.  FrkC  1846.  e)  Allg.  EQescb.  Stnttg.  1841-44.  8  vols.  (UU  tbe  commence- 
ment of  the  lllh  cent) 

a)  Synop»is  Hist  Bel.  et  EccL  Cbr.  methodo  systematica  adambrata.  Prag.  17S5.  Einl  m  d.  Cbr. 
BeL  n.  KGesch.  Prag.  1788881  2d  (modified)  ed.  1790.  Chr.  Bel.  a.  EGesch.  (but  one  Per.)  Pr. 
1739-9&  4  Tola,  b)  Institt  Hist  Eccl  Vien.  (1788.)  1806.  2  Th.  Thread  of  the  narraUre  after  Dan- 
neam.  (Collegienbeft)  2  ed.  BottweiL  1826-a  4  Th.    c)  Oesoh.  d.  ChristL  BaL  a.  Kirche.  ZQr.  1792. 


I 


12  INTRODUCTION.    CHAP.  IL    LITER ATUBE. 

and  of  the  ancient  Ohuroh.  A  continuation  of  his  history  by  another  hand 
was  merely  a  labored  effort  to  attain  the  same  style,  (d)  With  the  same  gen« 
eral  views,  bnt  with  more  accuracy  and  science,  Katerhamp  wrote  a  history, 
in  which  he  has  exhibited  a  more  profound  acquaintance  witli  the  original  au- 
thorities in  his  representations  of  the  particular  characters  and  circumstances 
of  the  Church,  {e)  The  liberal  school,  which  now  sought  to  acconmiodate 
matters  as  much  as  possible  with  the  hierarchy,  was  represented  by  Bitter^  (/) 
and  in  the  extensive  and  popular  work  of  Locherer^  (g)  in  many  respects  like 
that  of  Schroeckh.  The  narrative  of  Butten^tock  is  carefully  limited  to  a 
mere  statement  of  facts,  (h)  In  other  places  the  various  parties  were  in  di- 
rect hostility  to  each  other.  The  hierarchical  method  of  writing  history  was 
defended  with  keen  wit  by  Hortig^  the  continuation  of  whose  work  by  DdU 
linger^  is  written  in  a  less  animated,  but  in  a  more  serious  strain.  In  his  re- 
vised edition  the  latter  has  promised  a  great  work,  in  which  those  fables  of 
the  hierarchy  which  are  altogether  untenable,  are  to  be  given  up  as  indififer- 
ent,  but  every  position  capable  of  any  defence  is  to  be  maintiuned  with  all 
the  weapons  which  a  learned  ingenuity  can  supply.  Ilis  text-book  contains 
merely  the  external  facts  of  history.  {%)  On  the  other  hand  Reichlin-Meld^g 
has  composed  a  prolix,  declamatory,  and  flippant  libel  upon  ecclesiastical  an- 
tiquity, and  of  course  fell  out  with  his  own  Church,  {k)  AUog  again  pre- 
sents a  specimen  of  a  rather  clumsy  but  spirited  attempt  to  transfer  a  Protes- 
tant form  to  a  Catholic  position,  {I)  and  Annegam  has  compiled  just  such  an 
artless,  rude,  and  tiresome  History  of  the  Church,  as  was  common  in  Ger- 
many before  the  time  of  Joseph  IL,  and  as  may  even  now  be  seen  in  many 
an  obscure  seminary,  (m) 

S  Th.  d)F.L.rf.  Stolb^rg,  Oesch.  d.  Rel  J.  C.  namb.  1806-1818.  Id  Tb.  (tUl  1480.)  2  ed.  of  1.  9  Tb. 
1810.  Index  by  MoriU,  YieD.  u.  Hamb.  1S3.\  2  Th.  oont  by  F.  R,  «.  K$rn.  Mentz.  1825-1^46.  16-42 
Th.  Index  by  8nMMn.  Mentz.  18S1  «)  KOe^ch.  Muntter.  1S19-S0.  4  Th.  (till  107a)  /)  Handb.  d. 
KOeflch.  £lb«rg.  Bonn.  1826-85^  8  vola.  1838.  2  ed  of  1  &  2  voliw  g)  Gesch.  d.  Chr.  RoL  a.  Kirohe. 
Raventb.  1824^8.  8  Th.  (till  107a)  A)  Institt  Hlstoriao  EooL  N.  T.  Ylen.  1882-84.  8  Th.  (tUl  1517.) 
<)  llandb.  d.  Chr.  KOesch.  v.  Ifortiff,  beend.  t.  DoUinger.  Landah.  182a  2  Th.  Newly  revised  by 
mUinger  (Gesch.  d.  Chr.  K.)  Lambh.  18338. 1  vol.  1.  2  Abth.  (in  part  Ull  IdSO.)  By  the  saoio. 
Liehrb.  d.  KGeftch.  Kegonsb.  183898.  2  vola  [./.  J.  Ig.  IXUlnger^  Hiat  of  the  Charch.  Trans,  by 
Ed.  Oox.  Lond.  4  vola.  6va]  k)  Gesch.  dea  Chrlstenth.  Frcib.  18S0a.  1  Th.  In  2  AbUi.  (till  1824.) 
I)  Universal-gosoh.  d.  Chr.  Kirche.  Mainz.  (1841. 1818.)  1S44.  m)  Gesch.  d.  Chr.  KIrcho.  MunsL  18129. 
8  vols.  (X)nip.  Jen.  L.  Z.  1844.  N.  1448s.  [Eng.  Gen.  Eccl.  Histt  arc.  Wtn.  Palmer,  C-onipend.  Eccl 
Hist  5  ed.  Oxford.  1844.  O.  Waddington^  IL  of  the  Church  to  the  Ret  Lond.  188a  2  vols.  A  cont 
through  the  Re£  Lond.  1888.  2  vols.  B.  J.  PrUsOey,  Gen.  H.  of  the  Chr.  Chordi.  Lond.  1808.  ft  voU. 
a  Jomm'  H.  of  the  Chr.  Charch  to  the  17th  centary.  Lond.  18da  2  vols,  a  if.  BuUer^  H.  of  the  Chr, 
Chnrch.  New  York,  a  C.  A.  Goodrich^  Church  Uist  Burlington.  1S80.  a  H  Stsbbing^  IL  of  tbo  Chr. 
Cbaroh  (a  ConU  of  MiloerX  8  vola  Lond.  1842.] 


ANCIENT  CHURCH  HISTORY. 

FIRST  PERIOD. 

FBOH    CHBIST    TO    OONSTANTINE. 


•  •* 


g  14.     General  View  and  Original  Authorities. 

L  1)  AH  eoclesUstlcal  writers  of  this  time.  Fragments  of  those  works  which  have  been  lost  In : 
Grdbe^  Splellegfam  Patmm  et  Haer«tioomm  Saec  L II.  et  IIL  Oxon.  (Ift98.)  1700. 1714w  8  toIs.  Bauth, 
Beliqaiae  taerae,  a.  aactomm  fere  deperdltorum  L  et  IL  Saeo.  Fragmenta.  [Edit  altera.  Oxon.  1847t 
4  toIsl]  S)  Fragments  of  IhgMippi  Owofitrfifuira  r&p  iKKktiauiffTtK&p  irpd^tofp  in  Bouthf  toL 
L  p.  187flBk  SuultU  4KK\7iffMtmK^  iffropUu  Ed.  Val4siu*.  Par.  1669.  £  K  Zimmermann^  Frcf. 
1822.  ii  P.  4.  Ifeiniehen.  Lpx.  1927s.  8  Tb.  4  Burton,  Oxon.  1883.  8  Tola.  [A  new  transl.  with  LlAs 
of  Eos.  Lond.  1842.  8.]  8)  Ituinartt  Acta  primornm  martynim,  ed.  2.  Amst  1718.  f  rep.  Oalura^ 
Aug.  y.  1802.  8  vols.  4)  Paesagee  fh>m  writers  not  Christian :  Josephns,  Snetonloa,  Tadtos,  PUninai 
Dio  Oasaia^  Scriptoros  Hist  Angustae,  etc.  explained  in  NaiK  Lardner;  Collection  of  the  Jewish 
and  Heathen  tesOmonlee  of  the  Christian  religion.  Lond.  17648B.  4  vols.  4  II.  TUUmont  (%  11.  nt  d.) 
(XtHH  Hist  eoc.  dnoram  priorom  Saec  Amst  1718.  4  iTosAemlide  rebus  Chrlstlanonim  ante  Const 
CommentariL  Helmst  1758.  4  [transL  by  Yidal,  2  vols.  8.  Lond.  18ia]  SemUri  Obe&  quibns  Hist 
Chrlatiaa.  mostratar  osqae  ad  Const  HaL  1784  11  W,  MiUman^  Hist  of  Christianity  firom  the  Birth 
of  Christ  to  the  extinction  of  Paganism  in  the  Boman  Empire.  Lond.  1840.  8  vols,  [with  notes  by 
Murdock.  8to.  New  Tork.  Kaye,  Eccles.  Hist  of  2  and  8  Centt  8vo.  1826.  2  vols.  &  Binds,  Hist 
of  the  Bise  and  early  Prog,  of  Christianity.  2  toIs.  Sva  Lond.  W,  B.  Taylor,  The  Hist  of  Christian- 
ity, from  its  Promnlg.  to  its  legal  eetab.  in  the  Bom.  Empire.  12ma  Lond.  1844  E.  Burton,  Leetorea 
npon  the  Hist  of  the  Chr.  Charch  from  the  Ascen.  of  J.  Christ  to  the  oonversion  of  Const  4  ed.  12m0i 
Lond.  1840.  Robert  Millar,  Hist  of  the  Propsg.  of  Christ  Lond.  2  vols.  8va  1781.  8  ed.  Wm.  Caw, 
Lives  of  Fathers  of  the  first  four  ages  of  the  Charch.  Lond.  2  vols,  fol  1688-87.  new  ed.  by  H.  Cary, 
lS4a  8  vols.  &  If.  Cave,  Prim.  Chr.  or  Bel  of  the  Ano.  Christians,  ed.  by  Giry.  Oxf  1840.  8.  Philip 
Schaff,  H.  of  the  Apostolic  Church,  transL  by  E.  D.  Teomane.  New  York.  1858.  8.  vol.  L  Samuel 
EUiot,  Hist  of  the  Early  Christians.  Lond.  1858.  J.  C  Robertson,  Hist  of  the  Christian  Church  to  the 
Pontif.  of  Oreg.  the  Great  Lond.  1S53.  8.] 

In  the  history  of  the  world,  Classio  Heathenism  appears  as  a  single  form 
of  human  life,  on  the  development  of  which,  its  time  was  fulfilled ;  and  Ju- 
daism appears  as  a  great  prophetic  system  accomplished  hy  Christianity.  The 
Jewish  veil,  under  which  the  latter  made  its  appearance,  was  removed  by 
Paul,  and  when  the  Gh)spel  had  been  proclaimed  in  aU  parts  of  the  Roman 


14  AXCIENT  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  L 

empire,  the  forms  of  Greek  and  Roman  civilization  became  incorporated  in 
the  Charch.  Bat  in  the  mean  time  a  prodigious  struggle  was  commenced  by 
the  general  spirit  of  antiquity.  The  Church,  not  so  much  by  intellectual 
weapons,  as  by  its  labors  and  sacrifices,  was  so  completely  victorious,  that  at 
the  end  of  this  period  the  Roman  empire  was  under  the  necessity  of  either 
becoming  Christian,  or  of  being  utterly  subverted.  During  this  struggle,  with 
no  aid  from  the  State,  and  with  no  external  interference,  the  Church  devel- 
oped its  appropriate  Constitution.  With  the  exception  of  individual  in- 
stances of  extravagance  or  timidity,  its  morals  and  its  discipline  were  of  the 
strictest  kind,  and  the  private  life  of  its  members  was  serious  and  heavenly. 
The  religious  feelings  of  the  people,  excited  by  Grecian  philosophy,  and  strug- 
gling with  subtle  foreign  elements,  now  sought  to  attain  definite  and  fixed 
forms  of  thought.  The  Period  may  be  naturally  divided  into  two  sections, 
the  first  containing  the  historical  conditions  under  which  Christianity  was 
introduced,  and  the  history  of  the  Apostolic  Church,  until  the  death  of  the 
last  of  the  Apostles,  near  the  close  of  the  first  century,  and  the  other  embra- 
cing the  formation  of  the  Catholic  Church.  The  Acts  of  the  Apostles,  by 
Luie^  are  the  commencement  of  a  Church  History,  limited  by  the  personal 
knowledge,  position,  and  object  of  the  writer.  It  presents  us  with  the  actual 
establishment  of  the  Church  in  its  two  principal  departments — among  the 
Jews  by  Peter,  and  among  the  Greeks  by  Paul,  (a)  The  authentic  epistles  of 
these  apostles  are  the  most  trustworthy  monuments  of  the  Apostolic  Church. 
Hegeaippus^  about  the  middle  of  the  second  century,  committed  to  writing 
every  thing  he  thought  worthy  of  preservation  in  the  Apostolic  traditions,  {b) 
The  first  proper  history  of  the  Church  (till  324)  was  written  by  Eiisebias  of 
Cac^rea^  under  the  impression  which  the  great  revolutions  of  his  age  pro- 
duced upon  his  mind.  Though  he  was  affected  by  the  prejudices,  he  possessed 
also  the  advantages  of  his  position,  and  while  he  probably  omitted  some  things, 
we  have  no  evidence  that  he  has  stated  what  is  untrue,  (e) 

a)  Schneckenberger  tL  <L  Zveck  d  App.  Oesch.  Bern.  1841.  h)  Euwb.  II.  ecc  II.  28.  IIL  16. 19. 
lY.  7&  11.  22.  Compi  IH^ron.  caUL  c.  22.  SchultkMi^  Hegcfl.  princepe  aactor  reram  Cbr.  Tnr.  1S92. 
c)  With  regard  to  bts  authorities  and  credibility:  MoeUer,  Hafh.  ISld.  (Archiv.  f.  KGesch.  vol  IIL 
at  1.)  Dftnz^  Jen.  1S15.  P.  I.  Kestner  Ooett  1817.  4.  ReuUrddhl^  Lond.  Qoth.  1S28.  JlUngtra,  Tn^. 
ad.  Rh.  1S88.  Jachmanny  in  Itlgons  Zeltschr.  1839.  U.  2.  F,  C.  Baur^  comparatur  Eva.  Historlae  ece. 
parens  com  parente  Hlstorlamm  Herodoto.  Tub.  1884  4. 


CHAP.  L    HEATHENISH    $  IS.    OSEEK  LIFE  15 

DmSION  I.     ESTABLISHMENT  OF  THE  CHURCH. 

CHAP.  I.    mTRODUOTORY  HISTORY. 
I.  Glassio  Heathenism. 

Crmuer^  Sfmbolik  n.  Mjthologle  d.  alten  Yulker,  bea^  d.  Oriechen,  I^m.  a.  Dannst  (ISlOea.)  1819m. 
Th. ;  Baur^  Symb.  u.  Mjth.  a  die  Natorrel.  d.  Altorth.  Stuitg.  1S25 ;  Ldbecky  Aglaopiiazniis  s.  de 
Theol  myfticM  Oraeeornm  eaoslB.  B«gloin.  1S29.  2  Th. ;  O.  JHulUr^  Prolegomena  za  e.  wiaa.  MytboL 
Gdtt  182&  [Intmd.  to  a  SdenUflc  Syat  of  Myth,  tranal  by  J.  Uitch.  Lond.  1844.  8] ;  P.  win  lAm^ 
Iwg  Bntweer^  Hist  de  la  civilisation  morale  et  reL  dos  Grecs.  Groen.  1883-48.  8  Th.;  JTeffOt  PhiL 
d.  BeL  BrL  188a  voL  2.  p.  148as.  Phil.  d.  Gcscb.  BrL  1387.  p.  282ss. ;  P.  F.  Stuhr,  die  Eel.  Systeme 
d.  Hellenen  in  ihrer  gescb.  Entw.  Brl.  1888 ;  Jf.  W.  EeffUr^  d.  Bel.  d.  Grlecben  a.  Burner,  Brandeub. 
184Si  [  W,  Smith,  Diet  of  Gr.  A  Bom.  Myth.  Lond.  1844-49.  8  volfli  B.  T.  Dwight,  Gr.  &  Bom.  Myth. 
New  York.  1849. 12]  ;—Ber0.  Ootutant,  du  Polyth6lsmo  romaln.  Par.  1888. 2  Th. ;  Ifartung,  d.  BeL  d. 
Burner.  ErL  188&  2  vobi ;  Ch.  WaU,  de  reL  Bom.  antiquiss.  Tub.  1845.  4.  P.  l.—Tholuck,  U.  d.  Weseo 
a.  sita  Einfl.  d.  Heldentb.  (Neandor's  Denkwiirdigk,  vol.  L  modified  in  the  2d  ed.)  [A.  Tholuek, 
Nature  de  Moral  InlL  of  Heathenism,  transL  by  B.  Emerson,  in  Biblical  Bep.  ft>r  1882.  and  in  Chu>ke*s 
BIbl  Gab.  vol  28.  Edinb.  1841] ;  Im.  yUasch,  CL  d.  Beligionsbegr.  d.  Alten.  (Stnd.  n.  Krit  1828. 
ToL  L  H.  8b.)  ;— /*.  Jacob*,  a  d.  Erxiehung  d.  Hellenen  z.  Sittlichk.  (Verm.  Schrr.  Lpz.  1829.  P.  IIL) 
Heldentb.  a.  Chrlstentb.  (Lpz.  1887.  Th.  VI.) ;  K.  Gruneisen,  (L  d.  SiUUcbe  d.  bild.  Eunst  b.  d. 
Oriech.  Lpi.  1888.  (Illg.  Zeltschr.  vol  IIL  st  2.)  [J.  Si  John,  Manners,  Castt  Arts,  &c  of  Ano.  Gr. 
Lond.  1842.  8  vols.  8;  H,  ffase,  PabL  A  PriT.  Life  of  the  An.  G^eek^  transl  from  Gemo.  Lond.  1888. 
8 ;  W.  A.  Seeker,  Gallas,  or  Bom.  Scenes  of  the  time  of  Angostns,  illost  the  manners  and  custt  of 
the  Bomans,  transL  fVom  the  Germ,  by  F.  Metca^e.  Lond.  1844.  8.  On  the  State  of  Man  before  Chris- 
tianity. Lond.  184a  12.] 

§  15.    Popular  Life  among  the  Greeks, 

The  original  oiyilization  which  had  prevailed  m  some  portions  of  the 
East  had  finally  hecome  torpid  within  limits  immntahly  fixed  hy  the  com- 
bined inflaence  of  caste  and  despotism.  Bat  under  the  delightful  sky  of  bean- 
tifol  Greece,  the  purely  earthly  life  of  man,  in  the  midst  of  efforts  to  attain 
social  freedom,  and  triumphant  struggles  against  the  monarch  of  the  Eastern 
world  (after  490,  b.  o.),  became  developed  in  its  fairest  natural  perfection. 
Borne  on  by  youthful  energies  and  a  noble  spirit  of  refinement,  directed  by 
a  clear  understanding  and  a  wise  moderation,  it  received  still  higher  lustre 
and  distinctness  from  a  state  of  art  which  gave  utterance  to  what  is  beyond 
expression,  and  proclaimed  the  reconciliation  of  the  spirit  with  outward  na- 
ture. Even  when  it  presented  nature  in  its  utmost  nakedness,  it  preserved  a 
chaste  moderation,  and  when  it  portrayed  the  darker  aspects  of  our  earthly 
existence,  it  always  made  liberty  and  beauty  triumphant.  Grecian  manners 
and  science  were  carried  by  travelling  expeditions  and  colonies  to  the  shores 
of  Asia  Minor,  Sicily,  and  Southern  Italy,  and  finally,  by  means  of  Alexan- 
der's conquests  (after  884),  Grecian  civilization  became  established  over  all 
the  Eastern  shores  of  the  Mediterranean. 

§  16.    Limits  of  Grecian  Refinement 

Man  was  regarded  only  as  a  citizen,  and  all  virtues  had  relation  to  the 
glory  of  his  native  land.  The  free  action  of  the  citizen  was  founded  upon 
an  order  of  slaves.  A  part  of  the  women  were  confined  within  the  narrow 
limits  of  domestic  life,  and  another  purchased  a  participation  in  manly  plea- 


^ 


16  ANCIENT  OHTJBCH  HISTORY.    PER.  I.    DIV.  L    TILL  A.  D.  lOa 

Bures  and  more  attractive  refinements,  with  a  proportionate  loss  of  womanly 
dignity  and  domestic  happiness.  The  political  power  of  the  several  States 
was  developed  and  consumed  in  factions  contests  and  civil  wars.  Even  in 
the  brightest  days  of  Greece,  civilization  had  to  contend  with  remnants  of 
ancient  barbarism  and  its  bloody  crimes. 

§  1 7.     The  Religion  of  the  Oreele. 

The  celestial  world,  in  which  the  Greeks  believed,  was  only  an  ideal 
transcript  of  their  ordinary  life,  embellished  by  the  hand  and  for  the  par- 
poses  of  art.  Even  the  &ncifal  relation  of  sex,  which  they  ascribed  to  their 
deities,  though  borrowed  from  oriental  aUegoriea,  was  so  modified  by  the 
poetic  imaginations  of  the  Greeks,  as  only  to  rofiect  and  justify,  as  in  a  mir- 
ror, the  playful  spirit  of  the  people.  This,  however,  exerted  no  very  cor- 
rupting influence  upon  a  people  whose  matrimonial  life  was  guarded  by  usages 
and  laws,  and  whose  vigorous  energies  were  controlled  by  the  gymnasiom, 
and  a  predominant  taste  for  the  beautiful.  But  every  thing  great  or  beanti- 
fhl  in  common  life,  was  adorned  and  consecrated  by  some  connection  with 
the  gods  of  their  country.  It  was  for  this  reason  that,  although  the  people 
were  sincerely  attached  to  their  deities,  and  their  religious  services  were  joy- 
ous festivals  embellished  with  all  that  art  could  contribute,  they  could  e^joy 
the  keen  wit  of  the  poet  when  he  ridiculed  the  weaknesses  of  the  gods,  no 
less  than  when  he  laughed  at  those  of  the  sovereign  people  of  Athens.  The 
religion  of  the  Ilellenes  was  necessarily  a  deification  not  so  much  of  nature 
in  its  mysterious  depths,  as  of  the  spirit  in  its  various  manifestations. 
The  real  Deity  revealed  to  them  was  beauty.  The  piety  best  conformed  to 
the  national  character  was  so  far  from  rising  above  the  earth,  that  it  never 
went  even  beyond  their  native  land.  The  mysteries  could  of  course  transmit 
no  doctrine  of  religion  inconsistent  with  this  spirit  of  the  popular  faith. 
They  were  simply  celebrations  of  the  festivals  of  the  ancient  gods.  They 
served  not  only  to  preserve  the  memory  of  the  old  and  fallen  deities  of  na- 
ture, but  to  create  a  presentiment  of  a  supreme  Deity,  who,  at  some  future 
period,  would  extend  his  sovereignty  over  the  universe.  The  point  at  which 
the  HeUenic  theology  found  its  termination  and  constructed  an  altar  to  the 
Unknown  God,  was  where  it  submitted  to  an  absolute  necessity,  ruling  over 
gods  and  men. 

§  18.  Relation  of  Philosophy  to  the  Popular  Religion, 
Socrates  (409-899)  brought  back  Philosophy  from  its  attempts  to  ex- 
plain the  universe  by  ingenious  fancies,  to  its  appropriate  Grecian  object, 
which  was,  to  render  the  mind  conscious  of  its  nature,  and  thus  to  become 
the  supremo  rule  of  life  for  a  freebom  man.  In  doing  so,  however,  he  was 
aware  that  as  a  citizen  of  a  moral  community  he  was  liable  to  come  into 
conflict  with  Athenian  usages.  From  the  position  which  he  had  attained, 
Plato  (428-848)  and  Aristotle  (384-822)  sought  to  discover  the  ultimate  prin- 
ciple of  all  knowledge  and  being.  Both  recognized  a  spiritual  and  indepen- 
dent author  of  the  universe,  and  both  appreciated  the  supreme  importance  of 
the  intellectual  and  moral  life.    Aristotle,  commencing  with  sensible  pheno- 


CHXP.  L    HEATHENISM,    f  IS.    GRECIAN  PUILOSOPnT.  17 

mena,  and  proceeding  by  successive  steps  of  reasoning  to  general  laws,  may 
bo  regarded  as  the  most  perfect  specimen  of  a  healthy  intellectnal  educa- 
tion among  the  Greeks.  If  Plato,  on  the  one  hand,  by  the  matter  as  well  as 
the  form  of  his  speculations,  shows  that  the  highest  point  of  Grecian  life  con- 
sisted in  adorning  the  present  existence  by  moral  excellence  and  beanty,  on 
the  other,  he  fhr  transcends  this,  and  stands  like  a  prophet,  incomprehensible 
by  his  own  age,  on  account  of  his  earnest  consciousness  of  sinfulness,  and 
his  absolute  exaltation  of  the  eternal  above  the  temporal.*  Those  who  un- 
dertook the  further  development  of  Philosophy,  attached  themselves  once 
more  to  the  purely  practical  tendency  of  Socrates,  and  to  the  various  parties 
already  springing  up  among  his  disciples.  They,  however,  seized  upon  only 
disconnected  elements  of  Grecian  life.  Epicurus  (842-271)  laid  hold  of 
pleasure  alone,  to  which  virtue  was  subservient  as  a  noceesary  means,  and 
Zeno^  his  contemporary,  selected  power,  with  which  virtue  is  herself  satisfied. 
The  former  regarded  the  universe  as  the  sport  of  chance,  and  the  latter  be- 
lieved it  animated  by  a  divine  omnipresent  soul.  In  opposition  to  the  views 
of  these  teachers,  and  especially  to  those  of  Plato,  there  arose  in  the  midst 
of  the  Academy  itself,  a  party  under  Areesilatts  (316-241)  and  Oameades  (214- 
129),  which  advocated  a  system  of  overwrought  logic,  teaching  that  man  was 
never  designed  to  know  the  truth  with  certainty,  and  that  consequently  his 
only  peace  was  to  be  found  in  dealing  with  probabilities,  and  in  the  conscious- 
ness of  this  universal  uncertainty.  Philosophy,  in  all  its  forms,  had  passed 
beyond  the  limits  of  Polytheism.  The  Socratic  school,  however,  regarded  the 
popular  faith  as  a  mode  of  conceiving  truth  indispensable  to  a  people  bound 
in  the  fetters  of  sensuality.  Its  disciples  therefore,  without  hesitation, 
adopted  the  usages  and  modes  of  expression  prevalent  around  them.  The 
way  in  which  Epicurus  maintained  the  existence  of  the  gods  was  in  fact  an 
adroit  denial  of  it,  but,  satisfied  with  having  freed  his  followers  from  all  fear 
of  the  gods,  he  was  wise  enough  to  warn  them  of  the  danger  of  contending 
with  public  opinion.  Stoical  Pantheism  allowed  that  the  deities  existed 
merely  as  names  and  allegories  for  the  various  manifestations  of  the  universal 
life,  but  ^he  deportment  of  the  sages  toward  them  was  proud  and  independent. 
The  later  Academy  maintained  that  the  existence  or  non-existence  of  the 
gods  was  equally  probable,  and  its  adherents  thought  it  safest  to  honor  them 
with  the  ordinary  forms  of  worship.  While  therefore  Philosophy  was  not 
Erectly  hostile  to  the  idolatry  which  had  prevailed -from  ancient  times,  the 
educated  portion  of  the  nation  were  elevated  by  it  above  the  popular  faith. 

:  §  19.    £ome  as  a  Republic, 

The  Roman  people  had  sprung  up  in  the  midst  of  violence,  they  had  been 
kept  together  by  a  rigid  discipline,  and  they  had  to  attain  maturity  in  the 
battle-field,  contending  first  for  their  existence,  and  then  for  their  greatness. 
At  an  early  period,  the  opinion  began  to  prevail,  and  soon  became  a  predomi- 

•  C.  Aekermann,  das  ChrlsU.  Im  PUto  a.  in  d.  plat  Pbil.  Hamb.  1885;  F.  C.  Baur,  d.  ChitiU.  d. 
PlatoDlsm.  o.  Sokr.  n.  ChristiUL  TQb.  1887 ;  [Plato  contra  Atbeoo,  or  Platonic  Theology,  by  T.  LewU. 
New  York.  184S.  ^  Pomi,  life,  Works,  Opiniona)  ^kc  of  Plato.  Portland.  &] 

2 


18  ANCIENT  CIIUKCn  HISTORY.    PER.  L    DIV.  I.    TILL  A.  D.  100. 

nnnt  popular  sentiment,  that  they  were  destined  to  attain  universal  dominion. 
All  the  virtues  which  constitute  the  true  basis  of  civil  and  domestic  pros- 
perity were  practised  with  simplicity  and  purity.  But  the  keen  enjoyment 
of  life,  natural  to  youth,  became  passionate  only  in  individual  instances,  for 
we  find  among  them  no  general  refinement,  or  cultivation  of  the  elegant  arts. 
Keligion  was  wholly  under  the  control  of  the  State,  and  its  sacred  rites 
were  for  a  long  time  only  in  the  hands  of  the  Patricians.  Its  serious  cere- 
monies pervaded  every  relation,  both  of  the  family  and  the  State.  While, 
therefore,  it  was  regarded  as  indispensable  to  society,  it  was  in  reality  only  a 
respectful  reverence  for  a  superior  power,  recognized  in  the  highest  degree  by 
the  boldest  and  mightiest  minds. 

§  20.    Detline  of  Greece. 

During  the  strifes  of  contending  factions,  political  power  had  become 
despotic,  in  the  hands  sometimes  of  the  nobles,  and  sometimes  of  the  popu- 
lace. The  consequence  was  that  Greece  was  distracted  by  internal  divisions, 
and  became  subject,  first  to  the  Macedonians,  and  then,  with  these  masters, 
(146)  to  the  Romans.  The  virtues  of  the  people,  which  had  been  founded 
upon  their  relation  to  their  native  country,  could  not,  of  course,  survive  the 
loss  of  their  independence.  The  individuality  of  character,  which  had  be- 
fore so  nobly  distinguished  them,  now  degenerated  into  selfishness ;  art  be- 
came subservient  to  the  grossest  sensuality,  and  it  now  became  evident,  in 
the  midst  of  public  misfortunes,  that  a  life  consumed  in  the  mere  embellish- 
ment of  an  earthly  existence  must  be  totally  unsatisfactory.  Yet  so  abundant 
was  the  inheritance  of  art  and  science  bequeathed  to  them  by  their  ances- 
tors, that  their  private  life  was  for  a  long  time  enriched  by  its  stores,  and 
Greece  gave  laws  to  its  conquerors. 

§  21.    Blemtion  and  Decline  of  Rome, 

When  Augustus,  in  his  testament,  advised  the  Roman  people  never  to 
snrpass  the  limits  which  nature  had  assigned  to  them,  as  the  permanent  bul- 
warks of  the  Empire,  all  nations  inhabiting  the  coasts  of  the  Mediferranean 
had  already  submitted  to  the  migesty  of  the  Roman  power,  and  all  nationali- 
ties had  been  broken  up  by  the  stern  unity  of  the  Empire.  As  tlie  Romans 
had  conquered  the  civilized  world,  they  now  resolved  to  participate  in  its  ad- 
vantages, by  enjoying  not  only  its  coarse  sensual  pleasures,  but  its  intellectual 
treasures.  But  Grecian  civilization  was  so  far  in  advance  of  them,  that  it 
could  not  be  conquered  without  calling  forth  creative  powers  in  tlie  con- 
querors. By  the  subjugation  and  government  of  so  many  provinces,  such  an 
inequality  in  power  and  possessions  was  introduced,  that  universal  freedom 
was  no  longer  tolerable,  and  the  popular  character  became  so  degraded,  that 
in  spite  of  republican  forms,  no  one  thought  of  combining  public  freedom 
with  the  monarchy.  The  will  of  the  prince  was  acknowledged  to  be  the  su- 
preme law,  but  the  supreme  power  was  actually  in  the  army.  Accordingly, 
the  successors  of  Augustus,  while  they  knew  tliat  they  were  masters  of  the 
world,  knew  quite  as  well  that  they  could  never  call  one  day  their  own. 
They  therefore  either  stupified  themselves  in  the  wildest  eiyoyment  of  the 


CHAP.  L    HEATHENISM,    f  22.    DECLINE.  19 

prcsont  moment,  or  sought  safety  in  a  reign  of  terror.  Tlie  wretchedness  of 
the  Roman  populace,  and  the  exhausted  condition  of  the  provinces,  were  in 
desperate  and  frightful  contrast  with  an  affluence  which  strove  with  shame- 
less ingenuity  to  wrest  from  nature  more  enjoyment  than  she  was  able  to 
give  or  endure.  And  yet  for  centuries  after  the  old  Roman  virtues  had  been 
lost,  there  remained  a  noble  national  spirit,  the  valor  of  the  legions,  and  in 
private  life,  the  supremacy  of  the  law. 

§  22.    Decline  of  the  Popular  Religion. 

The  Greek  religion  was  adapted  only  to  such  as  were  in  the  eiyoyment  of 
prosperity.  To  those  who  were  struggling  with  misfortune,  it  offered  neither 
consolation  nor  strength,  and  the  gods  themselves  had  apparently  deserted 
the  cities  from  which  they  were  now  invited  by  the  conquerors.  The  deifi- 
cation of  Roman  despots  threw  scandal  on  the  gods,  and  revealed  the  secret 
of  their  origin.  The  explanation  of  the  Greek  myths  undermined  also  the 
veneration  which  had  before  been  felt  for  Roman  ceremonies.*  Philosophy 
no  longer  hesitated  to  mock  a  religious  worship  already  abandoned  by  its 
deities.  The  Roman  statesmen,  it  is  true,  thought  it  necessary  to  maintain  a 
religion  of  whose  nullity  they  were  persuaded,  because  it  seemed  to  be  the 
very  foundation  of  their  State.  When,  however,  a  people  are  governed  by  a 
falsehood,  the  fact  cannot  long  be  concealed  from  them.  The  human  mind, 
ordinarily  dissatisfied  with  infidelity,  and  especially  impatient  with  it  in 
seasons  of  peculiar  difficulty,  now  sought  for  the  peace  it  had  lost  in  all 
kinds  of  barbarous  forms  of  worship.  In  the  midst,  too,  of  those  frequent 
changes  of  fortune  to  which  despotic  governments  are  subject,  it  made  an 
effort  to  obtain  a  knowledge  and  a  control  of  the  dark  future,  by  means  of 
magical  arts.  Unbelief  and  superstition  were  thus  boldly  and  distinctly  ar- 
rayed by  the  side  of  each  other.  When  the  peculiar  spirit  of  each  nation 
had  been  destroyed,  a  popular  religion  could  no  longer  be  generally  upheld, 
and  the  gods  were  all  united  in  the  Roman  Pantheon.  Philosophy,  however, 
had  neither  the  inclination  nor  the  power  to  found  a  new  religion. 

II.    Judaism. 

F^av.  Jo9fphi  Opp.  ed.  Haterlcamp^  Amst.  1726.  2  Th.  f. ;  Small  ed.  by  OherthOr,  Wurtzb.  17S2sb. 

5  TJi.  tnil  In  the  1  Abth.  of  the  Bib!,  sacra.  Lpa.  182658.  5  Th.  [Transl.  Into  Eng.  by  W.  JTMtfton,  & 
od.  by  ilT  S'fbbinff.  8vo.  Lond.  1941.  and  a  n«w  Transl.  by  R.  Tntil^  with  notes,  Ksmv^  Ac.  and 
•d.  by  I.  Taykir,  Lond.  is  New  York.  1847.]  F.  C,  MtUr^  Judaica  s.  vetcrum  Bcrr.  profbnomm  de 
reb  Ja<L  fhizmni.  Jen.  1S32;  Vtlrinya^  de  Synogoga  vet  (Franeq.  1096.)  I^ucop.  1720. 4  ;  [Vltrlnga's 
Synag.  A  the  Chnrch,  transl.  by  Bernard^  Svo.  Lond.]  X  D.  Jfieha^is^  mos.  Recht.  Frkf.  1775fl& 

6  Th.  (TranaL  Into  V.nt^  by  A.  Smith,  4  vola  8to.  Lond.  1814];  J.  J.  /Tow,  Gesch.  d.  Israel,  Zar. 
27«tV«.  18  Th.;  /><«  Wette^  Lehrb.  d.  hebr.  ArcbAol.  nebst  Grandr.  d.  hebr.  Gesch.  Lpa.  (1814.)  1880; 
J.  M.  J"^  allg.  Gesch.  d.  Isr.  BrI.  1832.  2  vols. ;  \Joii£*  Hist  of  the  Jews,  ft-om  the  Maccabees  to  the 
|Tre<M:nt  day,  transl.  from  Germ,  by  J.  11.  ITopklnM^  1848.  New  York ;]  If.  Leo^  Vorles.  IL  d.  Ge«h.  d. 
jnd-  9(aat4.  BrI.  1823.  retracted  fn  hts  Lehrb.  d.  Fniversalgesch.  ed.  2.  vol.  L  p.  663m.  comp.  Stnd.  u. 
Krit  138a  vol  I,  p.  137SS.:  Berthsau,  zar  Gewb.  d.  Isr.  GGtt  1842:  ff.  Ewald,  Gesch.  d.  Volkea 
.^arael  b.  Clirlstoa.  Gott  13438s.  8  vols. ;  J.  Saleador,  Hist  des  Institutions  de  Molse  et  du  people 
bcbr.  Par.  1629.  8  vols.    [This  work  was  answered  by  M.  Dupln^  the  elder,  In  "  Jesus  devant  Caiphe 

*  L.  JTrahner^  Qmndllnlen  z.  Gesch.  d.  Yerfiills  d.  rum.  BtaatareL  HaL  1887. 4. 


20  ANCIENT  CHUSCH  HISTORY.    PEE.  L    DIV.  L    TILL  A.  D.  lOa 

•t  PilAte,"  Par.  1S29.  8]  ;  Gramberg,  krlt  Qesch.  d.  R.  Ideen  d.  A.  T.  Ba  1S208.  2  Th.;  Vatke,  d 
BeL  d.  A.  T.  BrI.  1585. 1  Th  ;  <S:  Z.  Stsinheim,  d.  Offenb.  n.  d.  Lehrbegr.  d.  Synag.  Frk£  1B85.  1  vol. 
A.  F.  Gfrbrer^  d.  Jahrb.  des  Ilellea.  Stnttg.  1S88.  9  Abtb.— ATfio&e/,  d.  Propbetlsmas  d.  Hebr.  Breal. 
1687.  2  vols. :  KdHer^  die  Proph.  d.  A.  u.  X.  T.  Lps.  1888 ;  [ff.  IT.  MUman,  Hist  of  tho  Jews,  from 
the  B.  of  Christ  to  the  Abol.  of  Paganism  In  the  Bom.  Emp.  with  notes  by  Murdock.  8  vols.  New 
York.  1831 ;  J.  JiatiMgt^  Hist  of  the  Jews  from  Jesns  Christ  to  the  pr.  time,  being  a  cont  of  Jose- 
phus,  transl.  by  T.  Taylor^  Lond.  170S.  t ;  D,  Sitau^»^  He1on*B  Pilgrimage  to  Jerusalem,  A  Picture 
of  Judaism  In  the  Cent  before  Christ,  transL  fh>m  the  Qerm.  Lond.  1824  2  vols.  8.] 

§  28.     The  Religious  Life  of  the  People, 

Jehovah  was  worshipped  as  the  only  living  and  Most  High  God.    His 
government,  by  agents,  in  direct  communication  with  himself,  collectively 
called  the  Theocracy,  was  regarded  as  the  only  legitimate  authority.    By  his 
law  the  spirit  was  wrested  from  its  hold  upon  the  natural  world,  and  his 
people  were  separated  from  all  other  nations.    When  the  popular  life  had 
attained  full  maturity  during  tho  period  between  Samuel  and  the  Exile  [1156- 
588,  B.  0.),  a  flourishing  kind  of  sacred  poetry,  with  no  great  refinement  of 
art,  became  developed,  and  the  manners  and  morals  of  the  people,  though 
rude,  were  generally  strict.    The  people,  however,  were  always  inclined  to 
apostatize  and  adopt  the  sensual  and  idolatrous  worship  of  nature,  prevalent 
among  the  neighboring  nations.     The  state,  distracted  by  the  struggle  of 
the  hierarchy  with  the  monarchy,  became  divided  (after  975)  into  the  king- 
doms of  Judah  and  Israel,  and  at  last  fell  a  prey  to  foreign  enemies.    It  was 
not  until  after  the  Exile,  that  the  spirit  of  the  people  corresponded  with  that 
of  their  law,  and  then  the  benefits  of  such  a  result,  and  the  complete  execu- 
tion of  their  political  system,  were  limited  by  the  dominion  of  the  Persians, 
the  Greeks,  and  the  Romans,  who,  without  intermission,  succeeded  one  an- 
other.   A  similar  religious  improvement  was  founded  upon  the  Sacred  Scrip- 
tures, the  type  and  mirror  of  the  popular  life.    In  the  midst  of  the  calamities 
of  the  Exile,  a  stronger  faith  in  a  future  state  of  existence  was  awakened,  in 
connection  with  the  explanation  of  moral  evil  by  demoniac  agency.    But  a 
natural  result  of  the  importance  which  the  hierarchy  consequently  gave  to 
the  outward  ritual  of  the  law,  was  soon  experienced  in  the  extreme  valuation 
of  these  observances,  without  reference  to  their  spiritual  import.    The  origi- 
nal contradiction  involved  in  the  idea  they  generally  entertained  of  a  God, 
who  was  the  sole  Lord  of  the  Universe,  and  yet  revealed  himself  as  the  Grod 
of  only  a  single  nation,  became  increasingly  prominent,  as  the  world  became 
more  generally  known.    Their  belief  also  in  the  exclusive  partiality  of  God 
for  themselves  as  a  people,  in  connection  with  the  continual  oppression  they 
experienced  from  their  foreign  masters,  produced  a  bitter  feeling  toward 
every  thing  foreign,  and  a  hatred  of  the  whole  human  race.    It  was  during 
this  decline,  and  as  the  precise  result  of  it,  that  the  predominant  religions  cha- 
racter of  the  nation  was  formed.    Its  ftmdamental  element  was  an  obstinate 
nationality,  and  a  bold  determination  to  sacrifice  every  thing  for  its  preeenra- 
tion.    This,  in  connection  with  their  internal  dissensions  and  moral  debase- 
ment, could  lead  to  nothing  but  a  tragical  result,  when  opposed  to  the  over- 
whelming power  of  the  Romans.    But  a  series  of  prophets  had  at  one  time 
been  produced  by  the  Theocracy,  in  connection  with  a  spiritual  tendency 
among  the  people,  which  had  taught  them  to  solve  all  the  cpntradictions  of 


CHAP.  L    JUDAISM.    |  24.    DISPERSED  JEWS.    %  25.    PDILO.  21 

tlio  present  time,  by  believing  contemplations  of  the  future.  These  Messianic 
prophecies  therefore  lived  on  in  the  hearts  of  the  people,  consoling,  hot  at  the 
fsame  time  ensnaring  them  with  the  strong  expectation  that  Judaism  was  des- 
tined to  become  nniversal. 

§  24.     The  dispersed  Jetc*  (cV  biafrrropa). 

Retnond^  Gneh.  d.  Aosbrelt  d.  Judeoth.  v.  Cyras  bis  a.  d.  Unterg.  d.  JQd.  Staats.  Lpz.  1T89 ;  Grooi, 
4e  mlgntlonlbas  Hebrr.  «ztrm  patrlam  ante  Ilieraa.  a  Rom.  deletam.  Oron.  1817.  4 ;  Lsvyuohn^  d« 
Jbdaeornm  sob  Caeaailbas  eoaditlone  et  de  Icgiboa  eos  spectantibtUL  Lugd.  1828. 4 

According  to  the  laws  of  war  then  prevalent,  Jewish  colonies  were  trans- 
ferred to  other  lands,  in  the  train  of  the  various  conquerors  of  Palestine. 
Individual  Jews  also  wandered  into  the  same  countries,  for  the  sake  of  gain. 
In  the  time  of  Christ,  therefore,  Jewish  communities,  subject  to  great  vicissi- 
tadeB  of  fortune,  were  to  be  found  in  every  part  of  the  Koman  Empire. 
With  their  characteristic  shrewdness,  and  their  inde&tigable  industry,  they 
had  acquired  wealth  by  commerce,  and  by  wealth,  independence  and  privi- 
leges. They  lived  according  to  the  law  of  their  fathers,  and  paid  homage  to 
the  hierarchy  at  Jerusalem,  as  their  highest  human  authority.  In  conse- 
quenee  of  their  temple  tribute  (didpaxfui),  their  offerings,  and  their  pilgrim- 
ages, immense  wealth  flowed  into  Jerusalem  from  every  part  of  the  world, 
and  became  an  instrument  of  great  power  in  the  hands  of  the  priesthood,  and 
A  temptation  to  Roman  rapacity  and  corruption. 

§  25.    Hellenism. 

C  G.  L,  Gr—tmann,  Qnaestt  Pblloiu»i>.  L  De  Theologlae  Phil,  fontlbos  et  anetorit  II.  De 
A<{yy  PhlL  Lpa.  1829;  Gfrdrer^  Phllo  a.  d.  alex.  Theoeopble,  a  ▼.  ElnlL  d.  JQd.  igfpt  Scbnle  a.  d. 
N.  T.  Stottg.  1881.  2  Abtb.  (new  Utle,  1885);  A.  F.  Dahtu,  gescb.  Dant  d.  J&d.  alex.  R«l.  PhfL 
HaL  1867.  2  Abtb.  eomp.  Baur,  In  d.  Jahrb.  t  wiss.  Kritik.  188S.  pi  787-92;  J.  a  L.  Oeorffii,  Q.  d. 
neowtea  G«9»DflL  te  Aaffosa.  d.  Alex.  ReL  PblL  (IIlgens'2eitschr.  1889.  H.  8.  4) ;  [J.  Bryant,  Seutt 
«r  PbU.  Jod.  on  the  Word  of  Qod.  Camb.  1797.  8]. 

Although  the  Jews  who  resided  in  countries  pervaded  by  Grecian  culture 
seldom  gave  op  their  national  attachments  and  spirit,  they  were  unavoidably 
mneh  affected  by  the  intercourse  and  science  of  those  around  them.  Such 
was  the  origin  of  the  Hellenism,  which,  in  Alexandria,  then  the  great  mart 
of  trade  even  in  science,  gave  birth  to  the  first  philosophy  of  revelation. 
This  has  been  transmitted  to  subsequent  times,  principally  by  the  writings  of 
Philo.  (a)  The  contradictory  elements  of  which  it  was  composed  were :  an 
onconditional  faith  in  the  divine  revelation  contained  in  the  Mosaic  law,  and 
an  eqnal  confidence  in  the  truth  of  the  Platonic  philosophy.  These  conflict- 
ing principles  were  subjectively  harmonized  by  the  adoption  of  the  opinions 
that  the  Greek  philosophy  was  derived  from  the  Scriptures,  and  that  the  di- 
Tine  mind  in  the  Scriptures  was  to  be  discovered  by  the  allegorical  method  of 
interpretation.  Its  fundamental  principle  was :  such  an  extreme  refinement 
of  the  idea  of  God,  that  every  distinct  attribute  of  his  nature  disappeared. 


a)  PhUonU  Oppi  ed.  Mangey.  Lond.  1742.  2  Tb.  f.  Tbe  greater  part  of  tbls  Is  used  In  an  ed.  cnr. 
^fkigkr.  Ell  (178808.)  1820.  6  Tb. ;  Small  ed.  embradn;  tbe  remainder,  dlacoveriKl  by  A,  Mqjo^  A 
Auehsr^  In  2  Abth.  of  tbe  BlbL  Patrum.  Lpa.  1828aa,  6  Tb. ;  Creuter^  z.  Krit  d.  Scbrr.  d.  Pbllo. 
(Stud.  n.  Krtt  1831.  H.  1) ;  Groattmann,  de  PhiL  operam  contlnua  lerie  et  ord.  cliron.  Lpai  1841.  4 
P.L 


22  ANCIENT  CIIUBCU  HISTORY.    PEE.  L    DIT.  L    TILL  A.  D.  100. 

and  all  connection  between  him  and  the  world  ceased.  It  was  therefore  sup- 
posed that  certain  intermediate  beings  (\6yos  and.Xoyot)  proceeded  from  God — 
fanciful  creatures,  which  can  scarcely  be  called  personal  existences,  nor  yet 
mere  extensions  of  the  divine  essence.  These  gave  existence  to  Matter,  which 
was  not  divine,  but  was  formed  according  to  the  archetypes  of  their  own 
ideal  world,  and  was  animated  by  the  divine  breath.  Even  man,  so  far  as 
his  earthly  nature  is  concerned,  is  fallen  matter,  with  God  concealed  from  his 
▼iew.  But  that  which  was  originally  divine  in  him,  must  be  liberated  by 
struggles  and  self-denioh),  until  he  finds  his  true  life  during  some  favored  mo- 
ments even  in  this  world,  in  the  blessed  contemplation  of  the  Deity.  This 
divine  philosophy  was  reduced  to  practice  by  the  Therapeutaey  who  lived  in 
separate  huts,  chiefly  in  the  Mareotis,  near  Alexandria,  abstaining  from  oil 
pleasures,  cares,  and  toils  of  an  earthly  life,  and  entirely  devoted  to  the  con- 
templation and  praise  of  the  divine  nature,  (b) 

g  26.     The  Tliree  SceU. 

Trium  tciiptorum  illastrlain  (Dru«iit  Scaligeri^  Serarif)  de  tribus  Jad.neornm  sectis  fjninpm^ 
ed.  THglandim.  De1phi&  1703.  2  Th.  4;  /».  Beer^  OescU  Lehren  u.  Mclnungen  aller  ret  Sccton  d. 
Jud.  BrQnn.  18228.  2  vols. ;  Sc-hn^ckenhurger^  die  Pharisiier,  Kel.  Pliilosophrn  o.  Asketfker?  (Beitr. 
t.  ElnL  in>  N.  T.  Stuttg.  1882.  N.  7.)  GroMmann,  De  Philos.  Sadducaeor.  Lptk  1986.  IL  De  fra|^ 
mentta  8«dd.  exeg.  1887.  IIL  Do  etata  Sadd.  literario»  morall  et  politico.  lS8dt  4, 

The  most  distinct  forms  of  Judaism  in  Palestine,  after  the  time  of  the 
Maccabees,  were  represented  in  three  regularly  organized  sects.  The  Phari- 
aeeSy  i.  e.  the  Separated,  were  representatives  of  the  rigid  hierarchy,  and  of 
modem  Judaism  with  all  its  faults  and  virtues.  The  most  austere  portion  of 
this  sect  adhered  to  the  authority  of  Rabbi  Shamrnaij  and  a  milder  party  to 
that  of  Hillel,  In  the  latter  party,  a  tendency  toward  Hellenism  was  practi- 
cable, and  Gamaliel  is  said  to  have  participated  in  it.  The  Sadducees,  whose 
name  signifies  the  Righteous,  and  who  constituted  in  fact  the  wealthy  and 
aristocratic  portions  of  society,  maintained  the  older  Hebraism,  the  intellectual 
liberty  of  which,  in  a  corrupt  and  yet  8])eculative  period,  was  easily  perverted 
so  as  to  encourage  licentiousness  and  unbelief.  The  disputes  which  these  sects 
carried  on  with  each  other  became  sometimes  so  violent  that  the  govemmont 
was  disturbed  on  account  of  them.  The  Bssenes,  i.  e.  Healing  Ones,  or 
Saints,  were  those  who  had  become  dissatisfied  with  the  world,  and  in  ditfer- 
ent  degrees  of  their  order,  according  to  the  rigidity  of  their  asceticism,  with- 
drew from  all  public  life,  to  live  in  extreme  solitude  on  the  western  coast  of 
the  Dead  Sea.  Their  doctrine,  so  far  as  it  has  been  made  known,  indicated 
some  aflBnity  with  the  Alexandrian  philosophy,  as  it  converged  evidently  to- 
ward a  theory  of  angel  hierarchy.  Their  moral  system  and  habits  were  simi- 
lar to  those  of  the  Therapeutae,  although  they  adhered  more  decidedly  to  the 
Hebrew  prophecies.  Their  mode  of  life  was  communistic,  and  their  time  was  < 
wholly  occupied  in  prayer  and  labor.  Although  they  condemned  the  private 
possession  of  wealth,  individuals  might  possess  some  property  as  a  fief,  from 


I)  Tbe  orig.  evidence  in  Tarions  forms  in  Phllu,  and  inany  erroneoas  »tateinent8  with  nepect 
to  them  in  Eunfbius,  IL  £cc  IL  17;  Bdltrmann,  gesch.  Nachrichten  a.  d.  Alterthnme  iL  £»i«r 
n.  Therspeutcn.  Brl.  1921;  J.  Salter^  de  Easenis  et  Thorapeatia,  Yrat.  1820;  G/rdrer,  Abth.  S.  fi 
S90««w ;  Ddhnty  vol.  I.  p.  iSOas. 


CnAP.  L    JUDAISM.    I  87.    SAMiVSITANS.    f  28.    PROSELYTES.  23 

the  common  stock.    They  never  visited  the  Temple,  because  bloody  sacrifices 
were  offered  in  it,  but  they  sent  to  it  their  sacred  gifts. 

§  27.     The  Samaritans. 

Besides  the  Jewl»h  aooroes  of  »  partisan  character,  ccmsalt  The  Samar.  Pentatench,  even  in  the 
Arable  translation,  and  John  iv.  5-48 :  iJSiffert)  Pg.  de  temp,  schismatis  ecc.  Judaeoe  inter,  et  Sa- 
morr.  obortl.  Beglom.  188a  i.  comp.  Qase's  Leben  Jera.  pw  108a  [Neander*s  Life  of  Christ  p.  ISOra. ; 
n*ngatenh«rg^  On  the  Pentateach,  toI.  L  pi  TOss.;  if.  Stuart^  Essaf  on  Sam.  Pent  &  Lit  in  Bib. 
Bcpoa.  1831  P.  4  p.  6SL  Jk  Easaya  on  the  Old  Test  Andover,  1845.  8 ;  KitUft  Joomal  of  Sac.  Lit 
JaljT,  1898.  p.  898.] 

From  its  first  establishment,  the  kingdom  of  Israel  was  always  character- 
ized by  a  great  laxity  of  religions  faith,  a  dislike  to  the  Levitical  priesthood, 
and  a  fondness  for  the  idolatrous  worship  of  the  surrounding  nations.  Hav- 
ing been  conquered  by  the  Assyrians  (722),  the  small  remnant  allowed  to  re- 
main in  the  country  soon  became  nearly  amalgamated  with  the  heathen  colo- 
nists introduced  among  them.  And  yet  the  inhabitants  of  Samaria,  the 
fruitful  hill  country  between  Judaea  and  Galilee,  offered  to  assist  the  returning 
Jews  in  rebuilding  the  Temple  of  Zion.  This  proposal  being  rejected.  Just 
before  Alexander's  triumphant  march  through  their  country,  they  received 
through  Manassehf  the  exiled  brother  of  the  Jewish  high  priest,  and  the  fa- 
vor of  the  Persian  monarch,  not  only  a  copy  of  the  Pentateuch,  but  permis- 
sion to  build  a  temple  to  Jehovah  on  Mount  Gerizim.  In  spite  of  all  their 
foreign  mixtures,  both  of  sentiments  and  of  blood,  the  Samaritans  were  espe- 
cially attached  to  the  ancient  Hebraism,  and  carried  out  its  moral  and  intel- 
lectual tendencies.  They  shared  in  the  political  fortunes  of  Judaea,  and  were 
animated  by  a  similar  hatred  to  the  Romans,  but  the  State  possessed  very  little 
power,  on  account  of  the  still  greater  mutual  hatred  of  the  Jews  and  Sa- 
maritans. 

§  28.    Proselytes. 

The  contempt  which  a  people  without  refinement  in  art  or  science,  enter- 
tained for  every  thing  foreign,  was  of  course  met  by  the  Greeks  and  Eo- 
mans  with  a  similar  contempt  (a)  And  yet  the  strength  of  religious  faith 
among  the  Jews,  the  worship  of  one  Grod,  and  the  veneration  for  the  myste- 
rious rites  and  shrines  of  the  temple  of  Jehovah,  were  peculiarly  imposing. 
Modem  Jnddsm,  too,  was  naturally  inclined  to  conquest.  Hence  from  the 
general  inclination  toward  foreign  religions,  and  from  the  dissatisfaction  felt 
with  respect  to  the  social  relations  of  the  Empire,  many,  especially  women, 
laborers,  and  slaves,  felt  attracted  by  the  hopes  held  out  to  them  by  the 
Jews.  Some  became  proselytes  of  righteousness  to  Judaism,  and  many  re- 
nounced idolatry  by  obeying  what  were  called  the  Noachian  precepts,  and 
thus,  according  to  the  decision  of  the  milder  teachers  of  the  law,  became 
proselytes  of  the  Oate^  i.  e.  friends  of  the  Jewish  nation,  and  sharers  in  many 
of  its  hopes,  without  being  subject  to  the  yoke  of  the  law,  without  adopting 
the  narrow  prejudices  of  the  Jews,  and  without  expecting  justification  by 
their  extem^Q  services.    Others  pleased  or  silenced  their  consciences  by  the 


a)  TaeiL  Hist  V.  5 ;  Minueii  Fa.  OcUvias  c  la 


24  ANCIENT  CHUECH  HISTOBT.    PER.  L    DIV.  L    TILL  A.  D.  100. 

practice  of  Jewish  ceremonies,  and  allowed  themselves  to  be  beguiled  by 
Jewish  conjurers,  (h) 


CHAP.  n.-.THE  APOSTOLIC  CHURCH. 

Lud.  Capeili  Hist  ap.  lllattnU,  Oenev.  1084  4  ed.  Fahriciiis,  Lpa.  1691 ;  J.  F.  BuddH,  Eoc. 
tp.  Jen.  1789;  J.  J.  Hett^  Gesch.  u.  Schrr.  d.  AprwteL  Zarch.  1788.  4  ed.  18208S.  8  Th. ;  F.  LUcke^ 
Ck>m.  de  Eoe.  Apost.  Ooett  1818.  4;  J.  G.  Ptanck^  Oeech.  d.  Cbrtetenth.  In  d.  PMiode  ar.  ElnAihr- 
ang.  Gott  1818;  Th.  II.  A.  Neander  [lllst  of  the  Planting  and  Training  of  the  Christian  Charela 
by  the  Apoetlea,  TransL  by  J.  E.  Ryland.  Phil.  1  vol.  1844] :  F,  CK  Baur,  Paaln^  Stattg.  1845:  A. 
SdiM^Ur^  das  nachapost  Zeitalt  in  d.  Hauptmomonten  sr.  Eutwickl.  TQb.  1846.  2  toIs.  ;  eomp.  K. 
XtiUr,  iL  Cbr.  Urchr.  n.  Unchr.  in  Schwegler's  Jahrb.  1S44.  Joni \  (W.  O.  JHetMn^  d.  Urchiistentb. 
eine  Beleaeht  der.  y.  d.  Sebole  d.  Hrn.  Dr.  v.  Bavr^  iL  d.  Apost  Zeita.  an^fpettellten  Vermathangcn. 
HaL  1846 ;)  [JT.  R.  Eagenbach^  F.  C  Baur,  and  J.  P.  Langt^  have  each  pablished  Histories  of  the 
Primitive  and  Apoetollo  Chnrcb,  in  Genn. ;  G.  Benson^  Hist  of  Uie  First  Planting  of  Christianity, 
Lond.  1756.  8  vols.  A\  F.  W.  P.  Oreentcood,  Lives  of  the  Twelve  Apostles,  &o.  Bost  1846. 12;  L. 
Coleman,  Anc.  Christianity  exemplified.  Philad.  1858.  8  vols.  8;  IT.  W.  J.  ITiierteh,  Hist  of  the 
Chr.  Chorob,  vol  L  Apostolic  Age,  TransL  by  T.  CarlyU,  Lond.  1852.] 

§  29.     Tlie  First  Pevteeost. 

I.  Act9^  2. 1-41 ;  II.  Herder,  Gabe  d.  Spraeben.  Rig.  1794;  Ammon,  de  novis  llngals.  ErL  1808; 
Hate,  Zor  Gesch.  d.  ersten  Cbr.  PflngstH ;  {Winer*»  Zeitsebr.  t  Wiss.  TbeoL  1827.  H.  8;)  Bleet,  fL 
d.  Gabe  des  y\<&(rffais  \a\up.  (Stud.  n.  Krit  1829.  vol.  IL  H.  1 ;  comp.  Olehaueen,  vo).  II.  H.  8; 
BepL  Y.  Bleek,  1880.  vol  L  H.  1.  pw  45-64 ;  OUhaueen,  ibid.  p.  64-66l)  Baw,  Abb.  In  d.  T&b.  Zelt- 
schr.  t  TbeoL  1880.  H.  2;  Bdumlein,  Abb.  in  the  Stndien  d.  Wartemb.  Gei9tlicb.  1884.  H.  8; 
Schneekenburger,  in  bis  Beitr.  zar  Einl.  in'b  N.  T.  N.  &  Billroth;  [Expos,  of  the  Epp.  of  Paul  to 
the  Cor.  (in  Edinb.  BibL  Cabinet,  No.  21.  28)  on  1  Cor.  xlv.];  Z>.  Schvle,  d.  Geisteegaben  d.  errten 
Christen,  insbea  d.  sogen.  Gabe  d.  Spr.  BresL  1886;  Baur,  Krit  Uebvrs.  (Stad.  n.  Krit  1888,  pi  618Bit.) 
Seinecke,  Sprachgabe  d.  ersten  Christen.  Lpz.  1842. 

As  the  founder  of  a  new  popular  religion,  and  as  the  Messiah  and  Son  of 
Grod,  who  must  fulfil  all  the  longings  of  the  j)eople,  and  the  prophecies  of  the 
Scriptures,  Jesus  had  awakened  a  spirit  which  in  independent  spirituality  was 
to  rise  above  every  thing  earthly,  unite  men  in  love,  by  regeneration,  with 
the  Father  of  all,  and  regardless  of  all  national  distinctions,  bring  them  un- 
der one  great  bond  of  brotherhood  in  the  kingdom  of  God.  A  few  faithful 
disciples,  on  whom  exclusively  this  Spirit  had  before  rested,  waited  in  close 
fellowship  at  Jerusalem  for  the  promised  manifestation  of  this  Spirit.  Early 
in  the  morning  of  the  feast  of  Pentecost,  soon  after  the  Kesurrection  (about 
88),  on  the  occurrence  of  a  remarkable  natural  phenomenon,  they  felt  con- 
scious of  an  extraordinary  inspiration,  which  they  regarded  as  a  shedding 
forth  of  the  divine  Spirit  upon  their  hearts,  from  without  and  above  them- 
selves. This  internal  influence  manifested  itself  to  others  principally  by  an 
animated  and  copious  style  of  speaking — a  speahing  with  tongues^  which,  ac- 
cording to  Luke,  was  generally  regarded  as  a  decisive  evidence  that  Chris- 
tianity had  arrived  at  its  completion,  (a)  Such  phenomena  were  regarded  in 
the  primitive  Church  as  the  gift  of  the  Spirit,  bestowed  without  reference  to 
the  ordinary  state  of  the  heart,  and  were  indeed  frequently  abused  so  as  to 
become  subservient  to  vanity,  (b)    Such  was  the  fact  until  far  into  the  second 

l)  Jwoen,  Sat  YL  648.  Benee.  de  supentt  (in  AxtgwA.  de  Civ.  Del  VL  11);  Joeephi  Antiqq. 
VIII.  2.  6.  XVIII.  8.  5. 

a)  Acts  10,  46s.  19,  6.  oomp.  8.  Ifien    h)  1  Oor.  14 


CHAP.  IL    APOST.  CHUBCH.    |  S9.  PENTECOST.    S  80.  JEBUBALEM.  25 

oentmy,  (e)  and  even  to  a  still  later  period,  in  seasons  and  congregations 
in  which  powerftil  excitements  prevailed.  At  this  feast  of  Pentecost,  accord- 
ing to  the  rather  ohecnre  aooonnt  of  Lnke,  a  discourse  was  delivered  in  seve- 
ral foreign  languages.  A  power  to  do  this,  however,  was  not  regarded  in 
the  apostolic  Church  as  the  ordinary  attendant  of  this  gracious  gift ;  we  have 
no  account  of  its  repetition,  and  it  is  of  importance  only  as  indicating  that 
Ghristianity  was  destined  to  hecome  universal.  But  the  great  fact  which 
then  took  place,  was  the  revelation  of  the  new  spirit,  through  which  the 
Church  was  visibly  and  publicly  to  be  established. 

§  80.    Fortune  of  the  Church  of  Jeruealem, 

The  rage  of  the  people  had  been  appeased  by  the  death  of  Jesus ;  and 
when  the  recollection  of  his  benevolent  deeds  revived,  the  feeling  began  to 
prevail  throughout  the  city,  that  they  had  imbrued  their  hands  in  the  blood 
of  an  innocent  man,  and  possibly  in  that  of  their  own  Messiah.  When,  there- 
fore, his  timid  disciples  suddenly  announced  with  great  earnestness  and  con- 
fidence that  he  had  risen  from  the  dead,  thousands,  by  baptism,  professed 
themselves  his  disciples,  and  the  popular  favor  was  turned  toward  them. 
Alarmed  at  this,  and  divided  in  their  own  counsels  (since  many  of  the  Phari- 
sees, out  of  hatred  to  the  Sadducees,  were  willing  that  the  gospel,  which  pro- 
claimed a  resurrection,  should  prevail),  the  Sanhedrim  were  irresolute,  and 
adopted  no  efficient  measures,  while  the  apostles  were  full  of  courage,  will- 
ing to  suffer  shame  for  Christ,  and  determined  to  obey  God  rather  than  men. 
Still,  no  sooner  had  those  friendly  to  their  cause  become  connected  with 
them,  than  the  Galileans^  or  Natareans^  became,  as  before,  a  much-hated 
sect.  A  party  zealous  for  the  law  were  allowed  to  stone  Stephen  (about  86), 
and  Herod  Agrippa  looked  upon  it  as  a  popular  measure  to  persecute  the 
Christians.  James^  the  brother  of  John,  was  beheaded,  and  Peter  escaped 
the  same  fate  only  by  mysterious  aid  (44).  (a)  But  when,  on  the  sudden 
death  of  Herod  Agrippa,  (h)  all  Palestine  became  a  Roman  province,  the  con- 
gregation was  allowed  to  become  tranquilly  established  and  enlarged.  When 
most  of  the  disciples  fled,  on  the  persecution  after  the  death  of  Stephen,  the 
apostles  remained  at  Jerusalem.  There  stood  together  those  pillars  of  the 
Church,  Peter,  James,  and  John,  even  as  late  as  near  the  middle  of  the  cen- 
tury. After  that,  James  the  Just,  the  brother  of  our  Lord,  is  mentioned  as 
the  principal  leader  among  the  Christian  Jews,  although  all  authentic  ac- 
oonnts  agree  in  ascribing  to  him  a  high  degree  of  circumspection  and  mod- 
eration even  in  his  Judaism,  (c)  To  Judge  from  the  epistle  beying  his  name, 
he  must  have  been  a  pious  and  earnest  teacher,  especially  in  his  admonitions 
in  fsLYor  of  morality,  but  with  no  prominent  characteristics  peculiar  to  Chris- 
tianity, (d)  By  Jewish  Christians  he  has  since  been  honored  as  a  kind  of  na- 
tional saint ;  and  although  the  disciple  of  Jesus  is  not  very  prominent  in  his 
rigid  discipline,  and  in  the  remote  occasion  of  his  death,  this  was  only  to 

c)  Inen,  V. «, 

a)  Act*  C,  &>-T,  00 ;  12, 1-19.    h)  Acts  12,  dOaa.  eomp.  Jo§epM  Antlqq.  XIX.  T,  2.    e)  Oal.  2,  9, 
Mmpk  Aettl^  18m.    d)  Liter.  Reriew,  In  TheiU,  Gomm.  in  Ep.  Jao.  pu  2Ss8. ;  F,  ff,  Kem^  Char- 
0.  Ursproog  d.  Br.  Jak.  (from  fba  Tflb.  Zeltaehr.)  Tab.  188& 


26  AKCIENT  CnUECn  HISTOEY.    PEE.  L    DIT.  L    TILL  A.  D.  100. 

prove  himself  moro  perfectly  a  Christian  hero  when  he  was  called  actually 
to  die.  (e)  The  plain  testimony  of  history  declares,  that  the  High  Priest  Anah 
nus^  a  Sadducee,  availing  himself  of  the  interregnum  which  took  place  after 
the  death  of  the  procurator  Felix,  had  James,  and  a  few  others,  stoned  to 
death,  as  transgressors  of  the  Mosaic  law  (63).  (/) 

§  31.    Jewish  Christianity, 

D.  van  Hei/Ht^  D&  de  Judaeo-Christiftnistno  ^asqae  vl  et  efflcacltate,  qa«n  czsernit  In  rem  Chr. 
8aec  L  Lugd.  B.  1S2S.  comp.  %  85. 

The  dispersion  of  the  congregation  after  the  death  of  Stephen  was  the 
commencement  of  its  propagation  in  other  regions.  The  knowledge  of  Christ 
was  prohably  carried  by  pilgrims  from  Jerusalem  into  all  parts  of  the  Ro- 
man empire,  and  yet  but  a  small  part  of  the  Jewish  population  actually  be- 
came Christian.  The  principal  seat  of  Christian  Judaism  among  the  dis- 
persed portion  of  the  nation  was  at  Antioch^  where  the  name  of  Christian 
was  first  api)lied  to  the  Church  by  those  who  were  not  its  members. 
The  Jewish  law  was  observed  with  the  utmost  strictness.  Cliristianity  was 
regarded  as  a  perfected  Judaism,  whose  hopes  were  already  in  part,  or  soon 
to  be  completely  ftilfilled.  It  was  only  with  this  understanding  that  it  could 
have  gained  general  acceptance  in  Palestine.  The  Pharisees  were  inclined  to 
receive,  and  zealously  to  advocate  it,  so  far  as  the  doctrine  of  the  resurrec- 
tion of  Jesus  was  concerned ;  and  the  Essenes  were  favorable  to  its  religious 
spirituality.  The  assertion,  that  a  Jewish  Christianity  of  an  Essene  com- 
plexion sprung  up  at  an  early  period,  by  an  accession  of  a  considerable  num- 
ber of  Essenes  to  the  Church,  is  rendered  probable  by  partial  affinities  be- 
tween the  two  systems,  and  certain  by  witnesses  after  the  middle  of  the  se- 
cond century.  But  as  the  gospel  was  proclaimed  principally  in  public  assem- 
blies, and  as  conversions  from  a  community  so  rigidly  secluded  must  have 
been  extremely  difficult,  we  can  hardly  suppose  that  such  an  accession  could 
have  taken  place  in  any  large  numbers,  till  after  the  dispersion  of  the  Essene 
settlements,  and  the  desolation  of  the  Jewish  country.  Besides,  it  does  not 
appear  that  Christianity,  in  its  earliest  form,  possessed  any  prominent  traits 
of  an  Essene  character.  As  it  was  believed  to  be  intended  for  all  men,  those 
who  looked  upon  it  through  an  old  Hebrew  medium,  must  have  regarded  the 
reception  of  the  law  as  a  necessary  part  of  the  process.  According  to  Luke*s 
account  (Acts  x.  11-18),  Peter  could  be  indnced  to  baptize  a  proselyte  of  the 
gate,  and  could  justify  himself  for  the  act  before  his  brethren,  in  no  other 
way  tliian  by  the  assurance  of  a  divine  revelation.  But  as  the  Church  could 
not  tft  that  time  conveniently  separate  its  blessings,  the  more  rigid  Jewish 
Christians  demanded  that  baptized  proselytes  should  afterwards  be  circum- 
cised. 

§  32.    Samaritan  Christians  and  Sects, 

The  first  decisive  instance  in  which  Christianity  broke  over  the  pro- 
per limits  of  the  Jewish  nation,  was  that  in  which  the  gospel  was  car- 
ried to  Samaria.    The  seed  which  Jesus,  regardless  of  the  popular  hatred, 

e)  Suteb.  n.  ecG.  IL  1.  88.  /)  Jostphi,  Antiqq.  XX.  9, 1. 


CHAP.  IL    APOST.  CHUECn.    {  82.  SIMON.    %  83.  PAUL.  27 

had  sown  in  Sychem,  was  harvested  by  the  apostles,  (a)  The  Samaritans, 
however,  were  at  tliat  time  too  much  taken  up  with  the  claims  of  certain 
founders  of  new  religions  in  their  own  midst,  strange  phantoms  of  the  truth, 
to  be  much  interested  in  a  Messiah  from  Judea.  Dotitheus^  professing  to  be 
the  prophet  promised  in  the  likeness  of  Moses  (Dent.  18,  18),  had  appeared 
among  them  with  a  severe  exaggeration  of  the  letter  of  the  law,  and  had 
finally  starved  himself  in  a  cave.  (//)  Simon  Magus  obtained  many  adherents 
in  Samaria,  and  perhaps  also  some  in  Rome.  According  to  his  own  assertion, 
or  at  least  that  of  his  followers,  he  was  an  incarnation  of  the  Spirit  which 
had  created  the  world,  to  deliver  the  soul  of  the  world,  in  bondage  to  the 
earthly  powers,  by  whom  it  had  been  confined  in  a  woman,  and  at  that  time 
in  his  own  wife,  Helena.  With  the  deliverance  of  this  world-soul,  all  be- 
lievers were  also  to  be  released  from  their  imprisonment.  He  was,  however, 
anxious  to  purchase  the  Holy  Ghost  from  the  apostles,  and  trembled  before 
their  malediction,  (r)  In  some  accounts,  he  appears  degraded  to  a  mere  pan- 
der to  lewdness^,  {cT)  and  in  popular  traditions  he  became  the  representative  of  all 
magical  arts  aud  their  fortunes  during  his  day,  in  contrast  with  the  triumph- 
ant simplicity  of  pious  faith,  (e)  Menander  also  aspired  to  the  honor  of  be- 
ing a  Messiah,  and  a  divine  incarnation,  with  power  to  make  his  followers 
immorUd.  (/)  The  influence  of  each  of  these  three  impostors  was  continued 
through  some  minor  sects  until  some  time  in  the  sixth  century.  They  were 
often  confounded,  by  those  who  were  not  well  informed  on  the  subject,  with 
tlie  followers  of  Christ ;  and  perhaps  some  of  them,  like  Simon  himself,  at 
one  time,  from  worldly  policy,  may  have  passed  themselves  off  as  such.  It 
18  possible,  too,  that  they  may  sometimes  have  really  claimed  to  be  Chris- 
tians, in  uocordanoe  with  a  doctrine  by  which  all  religions  were  mingled  to- 
gether, and  the  same  God  was  said  to  have  revealed  himself  to  the  Samari- 
tans as  the  Father,  to  the  Jews  as  the  Son,  and  to  the  Gentiles  as  the  Spirit 

§88.    Paul, 

J.  Paarson^  Aniudes  PauL  Hal.  1718.  [Lond.  16Sa  4  transL  into  Eng.  by  Williams^  Cambr. 
1884L  t2.]  W.  Paley,  Horae  PanL  or  the  Troth  of  the  Scriptural  Hist  of  Paul  erince(L  [With  a 
■DppL  bj  E.  BiUy.  Load.  1840.  Illnatrated  by  Tate.  Lond.  1887.  PabL  in  New  York.  1848.  In 
work&  Oambr.  (aiass.)  1880.]  J.  T.  llemMn,  der  Ap.  P.  Outt  1880 ;  K.  Schroder^  der  Ap.  P.  Lps. 
1S80HL  6  vols. ;  TholucJt^  LebeoHumstAnde,  Character  u.  Spracbe  d.  P. ;  (Stud,  a  Krlt  1885.  H.  2. 
and  Verm.  Scbrr.  yoL  IL  p.  8*2«.)  [Life  and  Cbar.  of  Paal,  tranal.  fh)m  the  Oerm.  of  A.  Tho- 
iMdfc,  and  pubL  in  the  Edinb.  BibL  Cabinet,  vol.  83.]  U.  A.  SchoU,  Erurtr.  einiger  Cbronol.  Pnnkte 
in  d.  Leben^escb.  d.  P.  Jena.  1832 :  «/:  /^.  Wurm^  \L  d.  Zeitbest  im  Lebon  d.  P. ;  (Tub.  Zeitschr.  f. 
TbeoL  ISSa  H.  1) ;— Z.  UeUri,  Kntw.  d.  P.  Lcbrbcgr.  Zur.  1824.  edl  5. 1884.  A.  F.  Dahne,  Entw. 
d.  P.  Lebrbegr.  Hal  1885;— itour,  Paulas  (p.  24.) 

The  development  of  Obristianity  as  a  spiritnal  religion  for  the,  whole 
world,  was  accomplished  principally  by  the  agency  of  Sanl,  called  after  the 
Boman  form  Paul.  The  idea  of  its  liberation  from  Judaism  did  not,  indeed, 
originate  with  him,  for  certain  Hellenists  from  Cypms  had  before  preached 

a)  Ada  %  5-17;  John  4,  35-3a  h)  OHff.  de  princ.  IV,  17.  (vol.  L  p.  178)  In  Jo.  torn.  18.  (vol.  IV. 
p.  287);  Epiphan.  0pp.,  vol.  L  p.  80.  c)  Acta  8,  9-24;  Jtistin.  ApoL  L  c.  26,  66;  Tryph.  c.  120; 
(Simoni  Deo  Sancto.  Senioni  Banco  Deo  Fidlo;)  Ireiu  L  20.  Extracts  fh>m  both  Ettseh.  II.  eca  lit 
1&  Epiph.  Haer.  21.  d)  Jotephi^  Antlqq.  XX,  7.  2.  e)  Amob.  II,  12;  Clement^  UomlL  II,  298S. ; 
Seoognitt  I,  72.  If,  78a. ;  comp.  Tar  gum  Jeruahalemi^  ad  Nam.  81,  8;  Sueton.  Vita  Neron.  c.  IS. 
/)  JutUni,  ApoL  L  c  26;  EpipK  Haer.  22. 


28  ANCIENT  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  L    DIV.  I.    TILL  A,  D.  100. 

the  gospel  to  the  Greeks  in  Antioch,  (a)  and  Stephen  did  not  deny  the  charge, 
that  Jesns  had  come  to  destroy  the  temple,  and  to  change  the  ceremonial 
law.  (h)  But  it  was  reserved  for  Paul  successfully  to  justify  and  triumph- 
antly to  carry  out  this  idea.  He  helonged  to  the  trihe  of  Benjamin,  was  a 
Roman  citizen  bom  at  Tarsus  the  capital  of  Cilicia,  had  been  educated  for  a 
learned  Pharisee  in  the  school  of  Gamaliel  at  Jerusalem,  and  was  by  occupa- 
tion a  tentmaker.  The  traces  of  a  Greek  education,  which  his  writings 
sometimes  exhibit,  may  be  ascribed  either  to  the  school  in  which  he  had  been 
educated,  or  to  his  subsequent  pursuits  and  associations.  With  a  character 
not  only  great  but  exalted,  able  and  energetic  in  worldly  things,  though  Aill 
of  longings  after  those  which  are  heavenly,  he  placed  himself,  in  defence  of 
the  law  of  his  fathers,  at  the  head  of  those  who  persecuted  the  followers  of 
Christ.  Stephen  fell  before  his  eyes,  and  Gamaliel  warned  the  rulers  that 
they  should  not  contend  against  God.  But  while  journeying  to  Damascus,  to 
persecute  those  Christians  whom  he  might  find  there  (probably  86),  he  and 
bis  companions  were  suddenly  struck  to  the  earth  by  fire  from  heaven. 
Christ  now  revealed  himself  to  his  spirit  as  the  Saviour  of  the  world,  and  he 
could  no  longer  resist  the  mighty  power  of  truth,  (c)  His  rich  natural  en- 
dowments were  now  illuminated  by  the  gracious  influences  of  the  Holy 
Spirit,  his  former  self  was  cast  off,  and  Christ  alone  lived  within  him.  After 
a  residence  of  three  years  in  Arabia  and  Damascus,  he  fled  from  the  latter 
city  to  Jerusalem  (89),  that  he  might  form  an  acquaintance  with  Peter.  He 
was  soon  after  invited  by  Barnabas  from  Tarsus,  to  assist  in  the  work  of  the 
gospel  at  Antioch.  When  both  had  conveyed  provisions  fV*om  that  congrega- 
tion to  Jerusalem,  for  the  relief  of  the  brethren  there  (44),  they  were  sent 
on  a  missionary  tour  to  Cyprus,  and  some  provinces  of  Asia  Minor.  They 
commenced  their  labors  by  preaching  in  the  synagogues ;  (d)  but  as  they 
were  generally  treated  with  contempt,  and  often  with  much  abuse  by  the 
Jews,  while  they  were  generally  &vored  by  proselytes,  they  soon  began  to 
form  independent  churches,  composed  principally  of  Greeks.  These  they  re- 
garded, adbording  to  the  custom  at  Antioch,  as  not  bound  to  observe  the  cere- 
monial law,  and  it  was  even  rumored  that  Paul  had  gone  so  far  as  to  prevent 
the  Jews  from  circumcising  their  children.  He  himself,  however,  conformed 
to  the  ritual  of  the  law,  at  least  as  far  as  appeared  expedient  to  prevent  all 
unnecessary  ofience  to  his  brethren ;  and  accordingly,  in  Christian  liberty,  he 
was  a  Greek  with  Greeks  and  a  Jew  with  Jews.  But  at  Antioch,  some  from 
Jerusalem  maintained  that  circumcision  was  indbpensable  to  salvation.  In 
consequence  of  the  division  created  by  this  party,  Paul  and  Barnabas  under- 
took a  journey  to  Jerusalem  (about  60),  where,  after  hearing  what  God  had 
already  accomplished  by  their  means  in  carrying  the  gospel  to  the  heathen, 
the  three  apostles  of  Jewish  Christianity  extended  to  them  the  hand  of  fel- 
lowship.   A  charter  of  privileges  was  then  agreed  upon,  which  was  imme- 


d)  Actt  11,  8(X-89.  b)  Ads  «,  ISs.  e)  Gal  1, 15«. ;  1  Oor.  9,  1 ;  15.  8;  Aett  9, 1-99;  99,  8-16 ; 
98,9-18;  Ammon,6e  repcntin«  Bauli  oonvenione,  ErL  1798  (0pp.  theoL  p.  laa.);  GreUing,  Htst 
PsyohoL  Yen.  Q.  d.  pi  'tzl.  Ueberg.  d.  P.  (Henke*s  Mas.  1800.  vol.  III.  p.  99a)  Stratus,  Streltsohrr. 
H.  1.  p.  61««. ;  oomp.  R  Bengel,  ObM.  do  P.  ad  rem  Cbr.  oonven.  9  P.  (0pp.  ITamb.  1884)  \—C.  G, 
SlicMsr,  de  itDno,  qao  P.  ad  taora  ohr.  ooov^rto*  mt,  Lpa^  1898.     (f)  Conip.  Rom,  1,  16;  9,  9aai 


CHAP.  IL    APOST.  CHUKCIL    g  88.    PAUL.  2^ 

diately  sent  forth  in  a  solemn  edict  to  all  Gentile  Christians,  forhidding  any 
yoke  to  be  imposed  upon  them,  except  a  few  observances  like  those  which 
were  required  of  proselytes.  This  proceeding  could  not  be  reconciled  with 
the  original  covenant  (Gal.  2,  Iss.)  without  considerable  ingenuity  of  rea- 
soning, and  was  not  very  consistent  with  the  course  which  Paul  sometimes 
pursued,  but  it  was  a  well-intended  scheme  to  harmonize  those  conflicting 
tendencies  which  were  just  springing  up  in  the  Church,  and  of  which  tradi- 
tion gives  us  an  account  (Acts  15).  (e)  It  was  not  until  Paul,  fully  believing 
himself  called  of  God  to  be  the  apostle  to  the  Gentiles,  had  extensively  pro- 
pagated the  Church  among  the  Greeks,  that  it  became  practically  indepen- 
dent of  the  pr^'udices  which  prevailed  in  Palestine.  During  his  two  long 
Journeys,  and  his  protracted  residences  in  Ephesus  and  Corinth,  he  established 
numerous  churches  in  the  several  cities  of  Asia  Minor,  Macedonia,  and 
Achaia,  encountering  far  greater  difficulties  (2  Cor.  11,  20ss.)  than  are  men- 
tioned in  the  Acts  of  the  Apostles.  Hated  equally  by  Jews  and  by  Jewish 
Christians,  with  many  presentiments  of  his  approaching  death,  he  went, 
about  Pentecost  in  the  year  58,  to  Jerusalem.  There,  abandoned  if  not  be- 
trayed by  Christians,  he  was  delivered  from  the  hands  of  the  exasperated 
mob  in  the  temple  by  the  Koman  guards.  For  two  years  he  was  kept  in 
bonds  as  a  Roman  citizen,  by  the  procurator  Felix  in  Cesarea ;  and  when 
Festns  came  into  the  same  office,  as  the  successor  of  Felix,  in  consequence  of 
bis  appeal  to  the  emperor  he  was  sent  late  in  the  year  60  to  Home.  After 
a  stormy  voyage,  he  was  kept  in  slight  confinement  in  that  city,  and  during 
two  years  he  labored  in  behalf  of  the  great  object  of  his  life,  not  only  with 
those  around  him,  but  by  means  of  epistles  and  friends  with  those  at  a  dis- 
tance. It  is  hardly  possible  that  he  could  have  survived  the  persecution  under 
Kero,  but  he  was  probably  beheaded  at  Rome  (64).  That  he  was  liberated, 
and  that  he  then  for  the  first  time  visited  the  utmost  limits  of  Western 
Europe ,(/)  and  finally  ended  his  life  during  a  second  imprisonment  in  Rome, 
appears  more  like  a  learned  conjecture  than  an  ancient  tradition,  (j/)  His 
epistles  abound  in  rabbinical  explanations,  in  arguments  stated  in  the  form  of 
bold  and  complex  syllogisms,  in  evidences  of  a  highly  wrought  intelligence 
in  connection  with  a  profound  spirit  glowing  with  benevolence,  and  in  waves 
of  thought  which  appear  to  struggle  with  and  break  upon  one  another.  His 
style  was  concise  and  often  difficult,  but  he  always  had  the  right  word  for 
every  variety  of  condition,  sometimes  powerfully  convincing  or  threatening, 
and  at  other  times  carrying  all  along  with  him  by  his  cordial  expressions  of 
affection.  A  nature  like  his  may  have  ascribed  some  things  to  a  divine  reve- 
lation through  visions,  which  were  the  result  of  intelligent  reflection,  and 
which  may  have  been  influenced  by  his  peculiar  physical  temperament,  (fi) 

€)  Schnsckskburger^  Apostelgescb.  p.  Tlss.;  Schwegler^  DacbapostoL  ZetUlt  toI.  I.  pw  11688.; 
eomp.  IfMnder,  [Hist  of  Plant  and  Train.  &c  B.  IIL  Cb.  4.  p.  76a8.  8  ed.  Pbilad.  1844.  a] 
/)  Clem.  RotiK  Epw  L  ad  Gorintb.  c  5.  g)  EuMb.  H.  ecc  II,  23 ;—«/'.  P.  MyntAer^  de  nltimia  annis 
muneris  api  a  P.  geatL  Havn.  1815  \  J.T.L,  Darvs^  de  loco  Eosebii,  qui  do  altera  P.  captivitate  aglt, 
Jen.  1816u  4;—£.  F.  R.  Wolf^  de  alt  P.  captiv.  dss.  II.  Lpa.  1819s. ;  Baur^  die  Sogen.  Pastoralbr.  d 
Psnl.  Stnttg.  1885.  p.e888;  comp.  TQb.  Zcitschr.  1888.  IT.  8.  |  4888.;  Stud.  n.  Krtt  1841.  IT.  1. 
A)  The  viaiona  related  by  Luke  in  tbe  Acts  of  tbe  Apoatlea,  and  tbe  allosiona  to  similar  tbings  in  gen- 
nl  In  tbe  Clementinea,  are  conflrmed  in  2  Cor.  12, 1-9. 


30  ANCIENT  CnUIlCU  IIISTOItT.    PER.  L    DIV.  L    TILL  A.  D.  100. 

His  doctrines  are  essentially  the  same  with  those  of  Jesns,  so  far  as  they  pro- 
ceed from  the  acknowledgment  that  Jesus  was  the  Messiah,  and  are  the  views 
of  a  profoundly  religious  mind,  affected  by  similar  rational  prei)08sessioiis. 
They  were,  however,  at  the  same  time,  independently  founded  upon  his  own 
peculiar  life  and  conflicts.  In  the  first,  he  had  experienced  the  remarkable 
contrast  between  a  period  of  enmity  to  Christ,  and  another  in  which  Christ 
had  become  his  only  life.  This  private  experience  he  regarded  as  a  specimen 
of  the  life  of  mankind  fallen  from  God  by  sin,  and  reconciled  to  God  by 
Christ,  and  hence  his  evangelical  instructions  were  specially  directed  to  the 
awakening  of  the  consciousness  of  sinfalness.  His  conflicts  had  been  princi- 
pally directed  to  the  liberation  of  the  Christian  spirit  from  the  Jewish  law. 
He  therefore  maintained,  that  if  our  whole  salvation  must  come  from  Christ, 
the  law  is  not  necessary  to  salvation.  The  connection  between  these  princi- 
ples was  made  out  by  showing,  that  as  man  has  not  fulfilled  the  law,  the 
works  of  the  law  can  only  lead  to  condemnation,  and  salvation  can  be  ob- 
tained only  by  a  complete  surrender  of  the  heart  to  Christ ;  /.  e.  by  faith 
alone,  not  by  a  descent  from  Abraham,  not  by  the  merit  of  our  own  works, 
but  wholly  from  the  free  grace  of  God,  Paul  acknowledged  that  the  old 
covenant  was  divine,  but  he  contended  that  it  was  completed  by  the  new 
covenant  of  God  with  man  by  Christ,  so  that  now  it  had  become  an  abroga- 
ted institution.  In  his  estimation,  Christ  was  the  substance  of  all  religion, 
and  the  sole  ruler  of  the  world.  The  advent  of  X>hrist  to  our  world  was  the 
lofty  central  point  of  all  human  history,  from  which  he  looked  back  upon  the 
preliminary  revelation  which  had  been  given  to  Jews  and  Gentiles,  and  per- 
verted by  them  both,  and  forward  to  the  final  triumph  of  the  kingdom  of 
God,  when  all  opposition  shall  be  overcome,  and  Christ  himself  shall  with- 
draw, that  God  may  be  all  in  all. 

§  84.    Peter, 

Mayerhnf^  EInl.  In  d.  Petrin.  Schrr.  ITamb.  1885;  comp.  K.  Ha9€^  Leben  JestL  p.  112s.     \A, 
Le^  LU(B  (if  the  Ap.  Peter.  Lond.  1852. 12.] 

The  practical  energy  which  Peter  possessed,  and  on  which  our  Lord  him- 
self appears  to  have  founded  considerable  expectations,  made  him  the  princi- 
pal representative  at  least  of  the  external  affairs  of  the  Church,  as  long  as  he 
tarried  at  Jerusalem  (until  about  60).  At  a  later  period,  when  at  Antioch, 
principally  from  regard  to  particular  persons,  he  relapsed  to  the  exclusively 
national  view  of  Christianity,  he  was  decidedly  opposed  by  Paul  (Gal.  2, 
lis.),  who  advocated  a  gospel  free  for  all  mankind.  In  an  apostle  so  prone 
to  extremes,  such  an  act,  which  almost  seems  like  a  second  denial  of  his 
Lord,  is  no  more  incredible  on  the  ground  that  he  had  before  not  only  toler- 
ated, but  even  been  the  first  to  defend  Gentile  Christianity,  than  it  was  in 
Barnabas.  But  his  former  relation  to  Paul  appears  never  to  have  been  ftilly 
restored,  for  the  first  epistle  which  bears  his  name  contains  no  conclusive 
evidence  of  this,  and  in  the  memory  of  the  next  generation,  Peter  and  Paul 
were  at  the  head  of  opposite  parties  in  the  Church.  According  to  testimony 
derived  from  times  after  the  middle  of  the  second  century,  mingled,  indeed, 
with  many  errors,  legends  and  party  statements,  but  proving  what  must  have 


CHAP.  IL    APOST.  CIIURCn.    §84.  PETER.    J  85.  PARTIES.  31 

been  the  opinion  of  the  Roman  Chnrch,  Peter  snffcred  crucifixion  at  Rome 
(about  67).  (n)  Jerome  is  the  first  who  informs  us  (catal.  c.  1),  that  he  at 
one  time  resided  at  Antioch,  and  afterwards  was  for  twenty-five  years  Bishop 
of  Rome.  Although  satisfactory  evidence  from  the  history  of  Paul  proves 
that  he  could  not  have  resided  for  so  long  a  time  at  Rome,  and  even  older 
traditions  show  that  he  could  have  sustained  no  particular  office  in  the  church 
of  that  place,  since  they  mention,  in  different  orders  of  succession,  Linus, 
Anacletoa,  and  Clement,  as  the  first  bishops  of  Rome ;  (h)  it  is  nevertheless 
certain,  that  wherever  Peter  was,  his  personal  influence  would  always  give 
him  the  first  position,  unless  Paul  had  been  by  his  side.  His  character  is  well 
reflected  in  the  legend  of  his  flight,  from  which  he  was  recalled  by  some 
pungent  reproof  from  the  lips  of  Ohrist  himself,  and  in  that  of  his  crucifixion 
with  his  head  downwards,  (e) 

§  86.    Position  of  Parties  in  the  Time  of  Paul, 

In  its  progress  amoug  the  heathen,  the  gospel  necessarily  appealed  entire- 
ly to  the  general  religious  spirit  which  the  apostle  to  the  Gentiles  recognized 
even  among  them,  {n)  since,  with  the  exception  of  a  few  myths  which  might 
serve  as  types  of  Christ,  and  some  prophetic  announcement,  made  by  the 
Platonic  philosophy  with  which  the  apostles  were  unacquainted,  it  found  no 
promises  handed  down  from  the  fathers,  and  only  the  most  obscure  expecta- 
tions. Even  after  Christianity  had  torn  itself  entirely  away  from  the  Mosaic 
law,  in  consequence  of  its  own  origin  as  well  as  of  that  of  its  principal 
teachers,  the  Jewish  element  was  still  prominent  in  the  phrases,  doctrines,  di- 
yine  worship,  and  polity  of  the  Church,  and  it  was  not  remodelled  until  it 
gradually  became  affected  by  Grecian  modes  of  thought.  Jewish  and  Gen- 
tile Christianity  existed  side  by  side,  either  mutually  recognizing  or  exclud- 
ing one  another.  The  former  was  sustained  by  the  influence  of  those  who 
had  been  called  the  pillars  among  the  apostles,  and  possessed  an  external  sup- 
port in  the  necessities  of  the  poor  saints  at  Jerusalem,  (h)  An  internal  basis 
was  also  supplied,  by  the  concession,  that  it  was  a  duty  which  national  if  not 
religions  piety  required,  for  a  Jew  to  adhere  firmly  to  the  law.  Each  of  these 
forms  of  Christianity,  however,  must  finally  have  felt,  that  its  own  rights  de- 
pended upon  the  rejection  of  the  other.  It  was  therefore  always  urged  to 
adopt  the  exclusive  policy,  which  was  at  first  precipitated  by  certain  zealots 
among  the  Jewish  Christians,  perhaps  through  a  refusal  of  social  intercourse, 
or  posnbly  by  the  uneasiness  created  in  the  minds  of  some  Gentile  Chris- 

a)  DtonyHut  Corinth,  and  Caju«  Rom.  in  EuMb.  IT.  ecc.  IT,  25;  (The  doabtfUl  testimony  of  Pa- 
plia.  fb.  II,  19;)  Iren.  Ill,  1.  8;  Tet'ttd.  c  Mara.  IV.  5  ;—S.  ran  Til,  de  Petro  Romac  martfre,  non 
pontifleai,  L.  B.  1710.  4;  J.  O.  IltrbtA,  in  d.  TQb.  Qnartalsckr.  1820.  H.  4.  p.  &675n. :  on  the  other 
bajHl,  Fr.  Spitnhefnii,  Da.  do  Acta  prufectione  Petri  in  nrbem  Romam.  (0pp.  ML<«€ell.  Lugd  B.  1708. 
Th.  II.  P.  881n.);  Riur^  In  d.  Tub.  Zoltsohr.  1831.  IT.  4;  C  F.  t.  Ammon,  Forth,  d.  Chr.  z.  Welt- 
wl  Lpt  1840.  ToL  IV.  p.  819»  b)  EtiAeh.  11.  ecc.  Ill,  2;  Rujtni,  Praef.  ad  Recogn.  I»etri;  even 
tb«  CatnloguM  lAberiantUi,  aboat  854.  On  the  other  hand,  the  mont  recent  Cath.  assertion :  DSl- 
Unger,  KOesch.  vol.  I.  Abth.  1.  p.  6S%;  Windischmann,  Vindlclae  Petrinao,  Ratisb.  1S86; 
SUnglHn,  In  d.  TQb.  Qnartal«cbr.  1840.  H.  28.;  comp.  Baur,  z.  Literatnr  4.  Petms-Sa^  In  his 
Paidin,  p.  67188.  e)  EnMh,  H.  ecc.  Ill,  1;  Uleron.  catal.  c.  1.  On  the  other  hand:  TertiU,  d« 
r.  c  ML    [Art  in  Kitto*i  Journal  of  Bibl.  Lit  vol  V.] 

a)  Bom.  1, 19 ;  Acts  17,  22-29.    b)  Gal.  2, 10 ;  1  Cor.  18,  las. 


32  ANCIENT  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  L    DIV.  I.    TILL  A.  D.  100. 

tians  with  respect  to  the  law.  (c)  If,  therefore,  Paul  himself  spoke  somewhat 
equivocally  of  the  exorhitant  respect  paid  to  the  apostles  of  Jewish  Ohris- 
tianity  (2  Cor.  12,  11.  Gal.  2,  6),  his  apostleship,  which  was  referred  to  by 
every  opponent  as  destitute  of  all  external  proof  of  a  divine  call,  would  be 
barely  tolerated  by  the  more  liberal  portion  of  the  Jewish  Ohristians,  and  by 
the  more  intolerant  portion  would  be  positively  rejected.  Jewish  Christian- 
ity was  certainly  in  the  ascendant  in  Palestine,  and  there,  until  the  violent 
measures  used  by  Hadrian,  no  bishops  at  Jerusalem  were  chosen  except  from 
among  the  circumcision,  with  a  decided  preference  for  the  acquaintance  or 
kindred  of  Jesus  according  to  the  flesh,  (d)  In  like  manner,  in  the  circle  of 
Paulas  influence.  Gentile  Christianity  alone  could  have  been  predominant ; 
and  in  proof  of  this,  an  undeniable  document  exists  in  the  epistle  to  the  Ro- 
mans, in  which  the  principal  idea  is  the  overwhelming  superiority  of  the 
number  of  Gentiles  in  the  Church.  It  is  not,  however,  probable,  that  after 
Paul  had  been  removed,  and  the  destruction  of  the  holy  city  seemed  like  a 
divine  judgment  against  Judaism,  any  churches  composed  of  persons  bom 
and  educated  as  Greeks  or  Romans  would  be  persuaded  to  observe  the  Jew- 
ish law,  although  attempts  were  not  wanting  even  long  after  the  conmience- 
ment  of  the  second  century  to  form  associations,  and  exclude  members  on 
this  ground.  Accordingly,  when  we  find  that  Hegesippus  called  the  Church, 
which  had  existed  prior  to  the  death  of  the  apostles,  a  pure  virgin,  and  on 
his  way  to  Rome  found  what  he  called  the  true  doctrine  with  the  bishops,  we 
conclude  that  he  must  have  belonged  to  that  class  of  Jewish  Christians,  which, 
after  the  example  of  the  prophets,  and  of  our  Lord  himself,  was  not  op- 
posed to  a  Gentile  Christianity,  (e)  The  church  at  Corinth,  soon  after  its  or- 
ganization, presents  a  picture  of  the  parties  formed  especially  on  these  con- 
flicting views.  One  party,  which  assumed  the  name  of  Peter^  may  have  re- 
garded at  least  some  parts  of  the  Mosaic  law  as  still  in  force,  while  another, 
called  after  the  name  of  Faul^  looked  upon  the  doctrines  advocated  by  him 
as  exclusively  Christian.  A  third  party  could  flnd  true  Christianity  nowhere 
80  well  presented^  as  in  the  method  of  instruction  adopted  by  the  learned 
Alexandrian,  Apolloa.  A  fourth,  if  it  was  not  a  mere  branch  of  the  Petrine 
party,  mdntained  that  Paul  had  never  enjoyed  the  apostolic  privilege  of  a 
direct  intercourse  with  Christ,  and  appropriated  to  itself  exclusively  the  name 
of  Christy  because  it  r^ected  all  apostolic  traditions,  and  relied  entirely  upon 
its  immediate  union  with  Chrbt.  (/)  Paul  did  indeed  defend  his  apostolical 
authority  against  these  various  parties,  by  whom  the  unity  of  the  Corinthian 
Church  was  not  destroyed,  but  he  did  so  only  on  the  ground  that  he  had  re- 
ceived it  from  Christ  himself.  He  did  not  deny,  that  every  church  had  a 
right  to  use,  for  its  own  edification,  the  various  gifts  of  its  religious  teachers, 
but  he  warned  them  that  every  thing  which  was  not  built  upon  Christ  was 
perishable.    He  insisted  that  the  Christian  was  a  new  man,  after  the  image 

c)  C.  Buobt  de  abrog.  legls  Mob.  ex  Petri,  Jml  et  Jo.  itemqne  Eoc  ab  ilsdem  coDStitntanun 
Bententia.  Monte- A^lbano,  1342 ;  O,  X,  ScharUng^  de  Paolo  ^luqixe  adTenariia,  Haun.  1886.  d)  Svtub, 
H.  ecc.  IT,  5 ;  Stdp.  ^.  H.  aacr.  II,  81. 

e)  £ufieb.  H.  ecc  III,  83.  IT,  22.  /)  1  Cor.  1,  llsa.  oomp.  2  Cor.  10,  7  ;—Baur^  fl.  d.  Chri»> 
taspartei  In  d.  Cor.  Qemeinde  (T&b.  Zeltacbr.  1881.  P.  4.  comp.  1886.  p.  4),  a.  Paolua,  p.  860ml  ; 
J>an.  Schenkely  de  Ecc  Corintfala  primaeva  fkcUonlbiu  torbata,  Baa.  1888;  J)r.  J.  B.  Goidkom^  d. 


CHAP.  IL    APOST.  CnURCH.    $  88.  PARTIES.    $  S6.  JOHN'.  33 

of  God,  and  was  no  longer  a  Greek,  or  a  Jew,  or  a  Barbarian,  bnt  Christ  was  all 
in  alL  (g)  A  new  tendency,  having  its  origin  among  Jewish  Christians,  made 
its  2^)pearance  at  Colosse,  which  promised  its  votaries  a  mysterious  kind  of 
knowledge,  and  a  power  over  the  spiritual  world,  on  condition  that  certain 
unnatural  austerities  were  undergone,  (h)  On  the  other  hand,  Paul  main- 
tained, that  the  highest  wisdom  was  to  be  found  in  the  simple  gospel  of 
Ohrist,  and  that  a  Christian  had  a  rational  freedom  allowed  him  with  respect 
to  earthly  things. 

§  86.    John, 

rtete,  Yen.  e.  YoIlBt  Einl.  in  d.  Offienb.  Job.  u.  in  d.  apokal.  Lit  Bonn.  1882.  n.  Com.  vl  Q  Et. 
Job.  Bonn.  ed.  8.  1S40l  toL  L  Elnleitang ;  BaumgarUn-Crtudus,  Theol.  Ausl.  d.  Job.  Schr.  Jen. 
1848.  ToL  L  Einldtang;— JT.  Frammann^  d.  Ja  Lebrbegr.  Li>9.  1889 :  K.  R.  Kdsdtn^  Lebrbegr.  d. 
£t.  XL  d.  Briefe  Jo.  BrL  1848;— (?.  C.J.  LutzeWerger^  d.  KircbL  Tradition  0.  d.  A[k  Juh.  in  ihrer 
Onindloeigkitt  Lpa.  1840;  Baur,  tL  d.  Composition  a.  d.  Cbarakter  d.  Job.  £v.  {Mler's  Jalirb.  1844 
P.  1.  St.);  £  ZeUsr,  A.  fiaMern  Zeigniase  0.  Dasein  u.  Unpr.  d.  4  Ev.  {Thid.  1845.  P.  A);— J.  A.  IT. 
Ebrard^  de  Ev.  Job.  a.  dia  neneate  Hypotbene  iL  s.  Entateb.  Z&r.  1840;— ir  Grimnk,  Job.  in  Eracb. 
a.  Oraber'a  Encykl  sect  IL  vol  XXII. ;  comp.  Jfate^  Leben  Jesu.  p.  60s.  112a.  [A.  HUgenfeld^  d. 
Er.  a.  d.  Brieft  Jo.  nacb  ibr.  Lebrbegr.  dargeat  Ilalle.  1S49.] 

As  far  back  as  the  recollection  of  the  churches  in  Anterior  Asia  extended, 
John  appears  as  the  central  point  of  interest  to  all  the  congregations  of  Asia 
Minor,  and  moving  in  the  same  scene  of  action  which  had  previously  been 
under  the  care  of  Paul  at  Ephesus.  He  is  represented  as  indignantly  con- 
tending ag(unst  erroneous  teachers,  whether  of  the  Jewish  or  Gentile  parties, 
or  as  reclaiming  by  love  those  that  were  lost^  and  binding  all  together  in  uni- 
ty, (fl)  He  is  said,  by  the  legends,  to  have  been  miraculously  delivered  from 
martyrdom  at  Home,  (b)  A  residence  in  Patmos,  which,  according  to  his  own 
narration  (Rev.  1,  9),  must  have  occurred  in  the  time  of  Galba,  was  changed 
by  popular  rumor  in  the  Church,  into  a  banishment  under  Domitian.  All 
traditions,  however,  agree  in  declaring,  that  he  attained  an  age  in  which  the 
heart  alone  remains  vigorous,  {c)  and  that  he  finaUy  fell  asleep  in  the  midst 
of  his  disciples,  in  the  reign  of  Trigan.  His  life  and  death  were  vividly  re- 
flected in  many  legendary  accounts,  the  earliest  of  which  were  noticed  by 
himself  in  his  gospel  (John  21,  22s.)  (il)  Even  in  the  middle  of  the  centn- 
ry,  he  was  the  third  among  the  leaders  of  the  Jewish  Christians.  The  book 
cH  Revelations,  whose  authenticity  is  pretty  well  confirmed,  which  is  evi- 
dently conformed  to  Jewish  types  and  imagery,  and  must  have  been  com- 
posed prior  to  the  destruction  of  Jerusalem,  manifestly  corresponds  to  such 
a  pontlon.  In  that  book,  the  chosen  first-fruits  around  the  throne  of  the 
Lamb  belonged  ezcluavely  to  the  twelve  tribes,  but  beyond  these  were  an 
innumerable  company  from  among  the  Gentiles,  with  palms  and  white  robes, 
priildiDg  also  the  Lamb  that  had  been  slain,  (e)  The  natural  progress  of  a 
thoughtftd  man,  as  it  is  evident  the  author  of  the  fourth  gospel  was,  and  as 

Cbrlataipsrt  (Illgan*S  Zeitsohr.  1840.  P.  2);  Ddhfu,  die  Cbrlatuapart  Ual.  1641;  T,  F.  Knietcet>, 
Eea  Cor.  Tetoat  dtaaenstonaa  Oedan.  1842.  4  cf)  1  Cor.  8 ;  CoL  8,  lOa.  K)  CoL  2  '.—Schiuckmihur' 
0«r,  fi.  d.  Irrlebrer  ta  Col  (anbaog  z.  8cbr.  a.  d.  Proaelytentaofe.  BrL  1828.  n.  Beitr.  z.  Einl.  N.  14) ; 
BkeinwalA,  de  paaadodoctorib.  Coloaa.  Yeron.  Bben.  1884.  4 

a)  ^«M&.  H.  aoa  Y«  24  III,  28.  b)  TertuL  de  praescr.  0.  86.  c)  HUron.  in  Ep.  ad  Oal.  6.  d)  Au^ 
ffwtUne^  de  Trin.  TI,  89;  PMudo-UippolyL  de  conaommat  mundi  (Hipp.  0pp.  e<L  Fabr.  Append. 
pw  14) ;  oomp.  FabrieU^  Cod.  Apoc.  Tb.  II.  p.  088.    a)  Bw.  7,  4-10.  comp.  Jo.  4,  22. 

8 


34  ANCIENT  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  L    DIV.  L    TILL  A.  D.  100. 

one  so  specially  beloved  of  the  Lord  mnst  have  been,  daring  a  period  exten- 
sive as  that  of  an  ordinary  generation,  and  spent  among  churches  which  had 
eigoyed  Greek  cnltare  and  the  labors  of  Panl,  will  snfficiently  acconnt  for 
any  apparent  discrepancies,  or  tokens  of  advancement,  which  one  may  notice 
in  passing  from  the  Revelations  to  the  Gospel  and  the  first  epistle  of  John. 
In  these  later  prodactions,  the  same  spiritual  and  comprehensive  views  of 
Christianity  prevail,  which  are  so  manifest  in  the  epistles  of  Paul,  but  they 
seem  to  indicate  that  the  mental  conflicts  of  the  writer  had  passed  away. 
This  gospel,  moreover,  seems  to  appeal  not  so  much  to  a  spirit  conscious  of 
sin,  (md  specially  feeling  its  need  of  salvation,  as  to  something  exalted  in  the 
existing  nature  of  man,  and  its  aspirations  after  perfection.  Christianity, 
therefore,  appears  there  to  consist  not  so  much  in  mere  faith  in  the  mercy  of 
God  through  Christ,  as  more  immediately  in  love,  and  in  the  union  of  the 
divine  and  human  in  the  heart,  which  was  complete  in  Christ,  and  is  de- 
signed for  our  race.  The  incarnate  Logos  is  a  borrowed  symbol  of  this  uni- 
ty, partially  indicated  before  in  the  epistles  of  Paul,  (/)  but  presented  in  the 
gospel  in  a  dogmatic  form.  It  there  appears  as  a  celestial  being  not  belong- 
ing to  our  race,  but  taking  the  place  of  beloved  man,  although,  in  conse- 
quence of  personal  recollections  of  Jesus,  it  is  pervaded  by  historical  facts  of 
the  most  perfect  human  character.  The  love  which  John  inculcated,  is  pow- 
erful enough  to  conquer  death,  and  penetrate  through  all  obstacles  up  to  God. 
The  most  flourishing  form  of  Christianity,  in  past  or  future  times,  is  here 
partially  presented.  It  consists  in  a  life,  even  on  earth,  of  tranquil,  unbro- 
ken, and  everlasting  rest  in  God,  in  which  all  apparent  schism  between  the 
present  and  the  future,  the  human  and  the  divine,  has  been  overcome. 

§  87.  Parties  in  the  Time  of  John. 

The  same  subjects  which  were  destined  to  agitate  the  Church  in  ftiture 
ages,  began  already  to  be  discassed  among  opposing  parties.  The  various 
views  and  sects  which  had  formerly  prevailed  among  the  Jews,  were  certain- 
ly carried  forward  in  the  very  commencement,  so  as  to  produce  similar  vari- 
eties among  Jewish  Christians.  Even  the  different  conceptions  which  were 
then  entertained  of  Jesus,  had  their  origin  in  the  national  expectations  of 
the  Jews  respecting  their  Messiah.  But  as  every  account  we  have  of  them 
belongs  to  a  later  age,  it  may  be  that  the  first  power  of  Christian  love,  com- 
bined with  the  external  influence  of  Gentile  Christians,  was  then  sufficient  to 
hold  together  even  opposing  elements.  The  feehngs  of  bitterness  which,  ac- 
cording to  the  prominent  recollections  of  the  Church  in  the  next  century,  the 
apostle  John  entertained  toward  Cerinthusy  were  too  peculiar  to  have  been 
awakened  by  the  existence  oiT  any  thing  in  the  latter  of  a  merely  Jewish 

f)  The  paM^e  in  1  Cor.  8,  d  15, 47.  cannot  bo  explained  away ;  hence  the  more  distinct  and  prominent 
references  to  a  Son  of  Ood  who  existed  before  the  world,  and  created  it,  which  are  found  in  the  Epp.  to 
the  Cola^tflans,  Epbesians  and  Philippians,  form  no  ground  for  suspecting  the  genuinenesa  of  those 
writings.  Although  all  views  not  merely  accidental  mnst  have  their  appropriate  time  of  develop- 
ment, the  Jewish  notions  of  the  Meielah  and  the  Alexandrian  doctrine  of  the  Logos  were  so  pre- 
a4Juste<1  to  one  another,  that  they  might  ttuily  be  supposed  to  have  been  all  combined  together 
in  a  single  night 


CHAP.  IL    APOST.  CUUUCH.    $  87.  CEPJNTHUS.    ( 88.  TRADITIONS.  35 

cliaracter.  (a)  On  tlie  supposition  that  this  Cerinthos  taught,  as  lie  is  said, 
especially  in  Roman  and  Alexandrian  accounts,  to  have  done,  that  a  millen- 
nial kingdom  of  the  most  sensnons  nature  was  to  be  expected,  that  the  ob- 
servance of  the  law  was  indispensable  to  salvation,  and  that  the  origin  of 
Jesus  was  merely  human,  (b)  such  views  were  at  that  time  by  no  means  un- 
common. If,  as  Ironaeus  declares,  he  regarded  the  Creator  of  the  world  as 
an  inferior  being,  so  that  the  Most  High  God  was  not  revealed  until  he  ap- 
peared through  Christ  as  a  superior  being,  in  connection  with  the  man 
Jesus,  from  the  time  of  the  baptism  till  the  crucifixion,  (r)  he  must,  like  John 
himself,  have  meant  that  the  law  was  only  intended  for  the  development  of 
the  kingdom,  and  that  the  sensuous  glory  of  that  kingdom  was  merely  alle- 
goricaL  (d)  In  conformity  with  his  Alexandrian  education,  he  regarded  the 
Creator  of  the  world  as  an  intermediate  divine  being,  in  the  service  of  the 
supreme  celestial  Deity,  (e)  Those  who  looked  upon  matter  as  essentially 
evil,  in  accordance  with  a  doctrine  springing  from  an  overwrought  Platon- 
ism,  or  from  Hindoo  speculations,  and  certainly  prevalent  in  Alexandria,  must 
bAve  been  offended  at  the  idea  of  a  revelation  of  Deity  through  sensible  ob- 
jects. Accordingly,  the  various  forms  of  Docetism  agreed  in  declaring,  that 
every  thing  corporeal  in  Christ  was  only  in  appearance,  and  for  the  manifes- 
tation of  the  Spirit,  and  that  his  life  was  merely  a  continual  Theophany.  It 
was  against  the  subtilizing  process  which  this  view  rendered  necessary  with 
respect  to  the  evangelical  history,  that  testimony  was  borne  probably  even  in 
the  epistles  of  John,  and  certainly  in  those  which  bear  the  name  of  Igna- 
tius. (/)  The  Nieolaitans^  whose  name  was  doubtless  symbolical,  and  founded 
upon  traditional  recollections,  were  merely  the  first  representatives  of  a  large 
class  of  thinkers  in  subsequent  times,  who  abused  the  spiritual  superiority  of 
Christianity  to  all  corporeal  objects,  to  give  countenance  to  the  Greek  frivol- 
ity with  respect  to  the  relations  of  the  sexes,  {g) 

%  88.     Traditions  respecting  the  Apostles. 

The  stories  which  have  been  related  with  regard  to  a  division  of  the 
world  by  lot  among  the  apostles,  of  the  composition  of  a  creed  in  Jerusalem 
at  the  time  of  their  separation  twelve  years  after  the  Ascension,  of  their 
oelibaoy  or  continence,  and  of  their  martyrdom,  belong  to  the  legends  of  the 
fourth  and  fifth  centuries.  According  to  earlier  traditions,  which,  however, 
present  no  individuality  of  character,  Thomas  went  to  Parthia,  Andrew  to 
Scythia,  («)  Bartholomew  to  India,  Qi)  and  Philip  died  at  Hierapolis,  in  Phry- 
gia.  In  one  of  the  most  copious,  a  story  is  told,  and  highly  embellished,  of 
a  mission  of  Thuddeus  to  Abgarus,  prince  of  Edessa,  in  consequence  of  an 
earlier  correspondence  between  Jesus  and  that  prince,  (c) 

a)  Iritn.  Ill,  S;—8ehmidt^  Cerinth  e.  Jndals.  Christ.  In  a  Bibl.  f.  Krltik.  n.  Ex.  vol  L  p.  ISlas.; 
Paulus,  nist  Cer.  (Introd.  in  N.  T.  cap.  Beloctlora.  Jen.  1799);  comp.  Bdur^  Cbr.  Gnods.  T&b.  1885. 
p.  117.  40888.  b)  Eu9eb.  H.  ecc  III,  2S ;  Bpiph.  haer.  2a  c)  Iren.  I,  26.  d)  Iren,  V,  S3,  e)  The- 
odortt  HacreL  fkbb.  II,  8;  Iren.  I,  26.  /)  1  tAo.  1, 1-8 ;  4, 2& ;  2  Jo.  7;  Ignatius  ad  Ephea.  c.  7. 18. 
■d  Sroyrn.  c  1-8  ;—A.  H.  Niemeytr^  de  Docetis.  IlaL  192&  4.  g)  Rev.  2, 6. 1488. ;  2  Pet.  2, 15 ;  Jud.  11, 
yuror  rhv  \a6¥f  C9  3?lba  ,  oomp.  Iren.  I,  26 ;  Clem.  Strom.  IL  p.  4908. ;  IIL  p.  9229L  \—Miin- 
§eker,  Yermuth.  fl'd.  Nlkolalten  (Oablcr'8  Journ.  t  Theol.  Lit.  1608.  voL  V.  p.  1788.);  Etcald^  in 
ApoeaL  Jo.  p.  110 ;  Gfrbrer^  GiMcb.  d.  Urehr.  I,  2.  p.  402s«. 

a)  Eu^eh.  H.  eoe.  Ill,  1.    h)  Ibid.  V,  la    c)  Ibid.  I,  18;  K.  Uase,  Leben  J«8a.  p.  llai 


36  ANCIENT  CHURCH  HI8T0BT.    PEE.  L    DIV.  L    TILL  A.  D.  100. 

§  39.    Apostolical  Fathers  of  the  First  Century. 

Patrnm  qui  temporibns  apostolonim  flornerant,  0pp.  ed.  Ooteleriutu  Pir.  1672.  rep.  ClericHt^ 
AmsL  (1698.)  1724  2  Th.  f ;  Patrnm  appi  0pp.  ed.  RwHa^  Lond.  1796.  2  Th. ;  Patniin  app.  Opp.  ed. 
m/de.  Tub.  (18$9. 184a)  1847.  {A.  ButUr,  Lives  of  the  Fatben,  Martyrs,  dc«.  Lond.  1888.  2  Tola.  8; 
JE  BickergtetK,  The  Chr.  Fathers  of  the  First  and  Second  Centariea.  Lond.  1845.  12 ;  Ahp.  Wak^^ 
Ap.  Fathers.  Lond.  1817.  8.]— /r«yn«,  Jimiu^tivan  GiUe^  Commentt  de  Patrnm  qip.  doctrina  mo- 
rali.  Lngd.  1838.  4.    [ffUffer/M,  d.  Erforschnngen  1L  d.  Scbrr.  Ap.  Titer.  Berl.  1854.  a] 

When  the  contemporaries  and  disciples  of  the  apostles  left  behind  them 
any  writings,  they  were  distinguished  by  the  ancient  Chnrch  as  apostolic 
fathers.  The  genuineness  of  their  writings  cannot  be  perfectly  maintained, 
especially  against  the  suspicion  of  having  been  revised  in  later  times.  They 
resemble  the  writings  of  the  apostles  not  so  much  in  their  distinct  and  intel- 
lectual peculiarities,  as  in  their  general  conception  of  Christianity,  without 
doctrinal  precision  or  references  to  Grecian  learning.  The  epistle  of  Bama- 
has  treats  of  the  relation  of  Christianity  to  Judaism,  in  the  manner  of  the 
epistle  to  the  Hebrews,  with  an  allusion  to  the  temple  of  Jerusalem  as  if  it 
were  already  destroyed.  In  spite  of  the  powerful  historical  proofe  we  pos- 
sess of  the  genuineness  of  the  epistle,  the  insipid  spirit  and  the  stupid  arbi- 
trariness of  its  allegorical  explanations,  continually  suggest  doubts  whether  it 
could  be  the  production  of  a  man  once  regarded  as  the  equal  of  Paul,  (a) 
The  epistle  of  Clemens  Romanus  (Phil.  4,  3)  to  the  Corinthians,  was  intend- 
ed to  effect  a  reconciliation  between  the  parties  which  had  been  organized 
among  them.  It  inculcates  the  doctrine  of  justification  by  faith,  but,  in  the 
spirit  of  Paul,  it  exhorts  all  to  adorn  themselves  also  with  good  works.  The  se- 
cond epistle  which  bears  the  name  of  the  same  writer,  is  generally  of  a  devo- 
tional character,  but  it  is  a  mere  fragment,  and  of  a  very  doubtftil  authenticity. 
The  Shepherd  of  ffermas  is  a  strenuous  exhortation  to  morality,  enforced  by 
the  prospect  of  the  second  advent  of  Christ.  It  is  in  the  form  of  direct  rev- 
elations from  God,  and  visions  of  angels.  In  the  manner  of  Jewish  Chris- 
tians, it  displays  great  confidence  in  the  holiness  of  good  works,  but  contains 
evidence  that  baptism  had  already  taken  the  place  of  circumcision.  The  in- 
dividual whose  composition  it  professes  to  be,  is  unknown,  but  the  general 
use  made  of  it  in  the  churches  of  the  second  century,  for  devotional  reading, 
indicates  that  he  must  have  been  an  apostolical  personage,  (b) 

§  40.    Political  Overthrow  of  Judaism, 
Jo-phi  de  bello  Jnd.  L  TIL;    TwsiU,  HIsL  Y,  1-18. 

The  obstinacy  of  the  Jewish  nation  may  have  required  unusual  severity 
on  the  part  of  the  Romans,  but  the  extreme  violence  of  the  procurator  (7e»- 

o)  In  favor  of  its  genuineness :  E.  BmkOt  de  Epistolae  qnae  Bam.  tribnitor,  authentia.  Jen.  1827 ; 
JRdrdam,  de  aath.  Ep.  B.  Hafh.  1828 ;  Hatterkom  can  Bysewyk^  de  B.  Ambem.  1885.  On  the 
other  side:  UUmann^  in  d.  Stad.  a.  Krit  182&  P.  2 ;  Zug.  in  d.  Zeitscbr.  t  d.  Erzblsth.  Freyb.  P. 
98b ;  /r</Wd,  d.  Sendschr.  d.  Ap.  B  nntersocht,  Qbersetxtn.  erkliirt  Tub.  1840  ;~2>.  Sehenka  (Stud, 
u.  Krlt  1887.  EL  8.)  contends  for  the  interpolation  of  c.  7-12.  15.  16.  by  some  Therapeutic  Jewish 
Christians;  EeberUt  in  d.  Stud.  d.  GeistL  WOrtemb.  1846.  P.  1.  Chap.  16  seems  to  refer  to  the 
Temple  of  Aella  Capitolina.  h)  Bom.  16^  14  'O  rroiyAiv,  Pastor.  Lai  translation  and  Greek  Frsg- 
ments  \-~QraU,  Disqq.  in  Pastorem  Ilermaek  P.  L  Bonn.  1820. 4 ;  Jaehmann^  d.  Hltte  dea  Hermafc 
Kunigsb.  188B. 


CHAP.  n.    APOST.  CHUBCH.    |  4a  JEBUSALEIL    S  41.  KHPEItOBS.  37 

Biui  FhrvM  (after  64),  could  find  no  palliation  except  in  the  insurrections  to 
which  he  had  driven  the  people.  Thej  had  entered  upon  the  war  (66),  not 
so  much  in  the  hope  of  victory,  as  in  despair  of  all  earthly  peace.  Legions 
had  fallen  in  the  mountains  of  Judea,  when  Vespasian  (after  67),  and  after 
his  elevation  to  the  imperial  throne,  the  Cassar  Titus  (70),  arrayed  the  whole 
power  of  the  empire  against  Jerusalem.  The  Christian  churches,  remember- 
ing the  prophecy  which  Jesus  had  left  them,  abandoned  their  native  land, 
and  betook  themselves  to  Pella,  on  the  other  side  of  Jordan.  Though  famine 
and  civil  war  raged  in  Jeruaalem,  every  offer  of  mercy  connected  with  the 
condition  of  renewed  servitude  was  scornfully  rejected,  and  the  holy  city 
was  at  last  destroyed  in  a  sublime  death-struggle  against  the  whole  power  of 
the  Boman  world. 

§  41.     The  Soman  Civil  Power. 

[T.  Arnold^  Later  Bonun  Commonwealth.  New  York.  1846. 8  toU  8.] 

It  was  the  policy  of  the  Boman  government  to  permit  all  nations  under 
its  yoke  to  retain  their  own  gods,  but  some  very  ancient  laws,  forbidding  any 
Boman  citizen  to  worship  divinities  not  recognized  by  the  State,  and  any 
conqnered  nation  to  propagate  their  religion  in  other  parts  of  the  Empire, 
were  still  In  existence,  (a)  Hence,  the  more  Ohristianity  disconnected  itself 
from  Judaism,  the  more  it  lost  the  right  of  toleration  conceded  to  every 
national  religion,  and  by  its  efforts  to  make  spiritual  conquests  it  became  ob- 
noxious to  the  laws.  In  the  time  of  the  Caesars,  however,  so  strong  were 
the  indinations  of  the  people  toward  foreign  religions,  and  so  numerous  the 
admissions  of  foreigners  to  the  rights  of  citizenship,  that  these  laws  had  be- 
come nearly  obsolete,  and  could  be  restored  to  their  authority  only  by  special 
acts  of  power,  (h)  There  is  no  other  authority  for  believing  that  Tiberius 
ever  adopted  Christ  as  one  of  his  household  gods,  but  the  legends  of  the 
second  century,  (c)  Under  Claudius^  Christians  were  expelled  from  Borne  (58) 
merely  as  Jews,  {d)  Nero  (64)  transferred  to  the  Christians  the  guilt  of  his  own 
incendiary  conduct,  and  caused  all  who  could  be  found  in  the  city  to  be  put 
to  death,  for  although  they  were  generally  regarded  as  innocent  of  the  crime 
imputed  to  them,  they  were  condemned  as  enemies  of  the  human  race,  {e) 
Under  Domitian  (81-9G)  the  charge  of  Christianity  was  used  as  a  pretext,  by 
which  persons  might  be  convicted  of  a  kind  of  high  treason,  that  so  their 
property  might  be  confiscated,  and  themselves  banished  or  executed.  Flatius 
Clemens^  a  man  of  consular  dignity,  and  belonging  to  the  imperial  family,  was 
pot  to  death,  and  his  wife  Domitilla  was  banished  to  an  island,  according  to 
Boman  accounts  for  contempt  of  the  gods,  and  giving  themselves  up  to  Jew- 
ish practices,  but  according  to  Christian  views  as  martyrs  for  the  truth.  (/) 
Some  persons  arraigned  betbre  the  emperor,  on  account  of  their  connection, 
by  birth,  with  Jesus,  were  dismissed  without  molestation,  as  harmless  peos- 


a)  Cieero  de  leglb.  II,  8.  h)  Fr.  Walch^  do  Romanorum  In  tolerandli  divorsls  reltsrionibns  dfH* 
dpllna  puUiciL  (Nov.  Commcntt  Boo.  Beg.  Ooett  1788.  vol.  III.)  o)  Tertul.  Apolof^'t  c.  fi.  21. 
Id  bvor  oi  it;  Braun^  de  Tiberii  Cbrlstam  In  deorum  namenun  referendi  conMlio,  Bonn.  1S84. 
d)  SutUm.  Claud,  c.  26;  Ammon,  Pg.  In  Suet  Claud,  c.  25.  Erl.  19ia  4  e)  ThcUi  .\nn.  XV,  44* 
^iMCon.  Nero,  0. 16^  /)  SuOon.  Dona.  c.  15;  i>to  Cawius  (Epit  XIpbllini),  LXVII«  14;  Eanett. 


38  ANCIENT  CHUBCn  HISTORY.    PER.  L    DIV.  L    TILL  A.  D.    lOa 

ants,  ig)  Kerta  (96-98)  forbade  that  any  one  should  be  accused  for  being  a 
Christian.  In  the  midst  of  these  persecutions,  Christians  made  no  resistance 
farther  than  individually  to  assert  their  innocence,  and  then  silently  reagn 
themselves  to  their  fate.  (A)  Near  the  close  of  the  first  century  churches 
were  to  be  found  in  all  the  principal  cities  of  the  Eastern  empire,  but  in  the 
West  there  are  no  distinct  traces  of  them,  out  of  Italy.  The  first  converts 
were  principally  slaves,  laborers,  and  women,  but  so  numerous  were  they, 
that  even  then  it  is  said,  the  temples  of  Asia  Minor  were  deserted,  and  flesh 
which  had  been  offered  to  idols  could  find  no  sale. 

§  42.     Constitution  of  the  Local  Churches, 

C  M.  PfiMff,  de  originlb.  juris  ecc.  Tub.  1719.  e<l  4.  Ulm.  1759.  4.  {Greiling)  UrverC  d.  »p«st 
Chiistengem.  Halbnt  1819;  £rei9chnfiderf  die  Veil  z.  Zl  d.  App.  reprMflentaliv-dcmokr.  a  ariiito- 
krmtlBch?  (A.  K.  Zeitwig.  1S38.  N.  KiS:^  u.  Kirchl.  \to\\L  Zeitfragen.  Lpz.  1S17.  p.  ^\s».)\  R.  Rothe, 
die  Anfunge  d.  cbr.  K.  u.  Ihrcr  Yert  Witt  1887. 1  vol :  A.  PeUrsen,  die  Idee.  d.  cbr.  K.  Lpz.  1S89- 
46.  8Th.;  [J.E.  Riddle,  Manual  of  Cbr.  Antt  Lon«l  l^K  8;  J.  R  WUion,  Prim.  Gov.  of  Cbr. 
Churches.  ThllatL  1888. 12;  A.  A'eatuler,  Planting  A,  Training;  transl.  from  Germ,  bj  J.  £.  Ryland. 
Philad.  1844w  8.  JL  Coleman,  The  Ai>ostol.  &  Prim.  Church,  &c,  PhllaiL  1S45. 12;  A.  Btimen,  Id- 
qalry  into  the  Orli?.  ic  Gov.  of  Ap.  Church.  Philad.  1848.  12 ;  R.  Whntely,  The  Kingdom  of  Cbrbt 
New  Torlc.  1842.  \%\  J.  L.  Mokhelm,  Commcntt  on  the  AfTuIrs  ot  Christians  before  Const  transl. 
fhran  Germ,  by  Vldal.  Lend.  1818.  8  vols.  8:  J.  Bingham^  Ori^ines  Ecck'5la^ticae,  transl.  from  Lat. 
Lend.  1S52. 8  vols.  8;  P.  King,  Const  of  Prim.  Church,  I^nd.  1719.  8;  W.  Sciater,  Orig.  Draught  of 
Prim.  Church.  Lond.  1727.  8;  X.  Banga^  Orig.  Church  of  Christ  New  York.  1S5J7.  2  ed.  &] 

The  separate  existence  of  the  Christian  Church  was  effected  quite  as  much 
by  the  daily  religious  assemblies  of  the  disciples  at  Jerusalem,  as  by  their 
partial  exclusion  from  the  synagogues.  The  Twelce  Apostles  at  first  regarded 
themselves  as  a  perfected  or  exclusive  College  for  the  establishment  of  Chris- 
tianity in  the  world.  They  had  been  the  special  companions  of  the  Lord, 
and  were  now  the  principal  vouchers  for  the  evangelical  traditions.  They 
therefore  exercised  an  undisputed  authority  over  the  Church,  shared  however 
in  a  short  time  with  others,  who  became  distinguished  for  their  spiritual  gifts 
as  apostles  and  founders  of  churches.  Next  to  them  in  rank  were  the  Evan" 
gelists,  a  class  of  traveUing  preachers,  sometimes  also  called,  in  the  more  ex- 
tensive sense  of  the  term,  apostles.  The  Prophetic  was  the  gift  granted  to 
many  persons  at  that  time,  by  which  they  were  enabled  to  speak  in  an  in- 
spired, enraptured  manner  of  discourse.  In  the  case  of  Agabas,  however, 
we  have  a  specimen  of  a  class  of  soothsayers  who  only  faintly  resembled  an- 
other, then  for  ever  gone,  {a)  The  actual  officers  of  the  local  churches  were 
chosen  as  circumstances  called  for  them,  after  the  model  of  the  s^niagogue. 
Elders  (irptafiimpoiy  ^''?h?)  ''^cre  appointed  to  preside,  and  preserve  order  in 
the  church,  and  Deacons  (dtaicoi/ot),  to  take  charge  of  the  poor,  and  to  assist 
in  every  effort  for  the  common  good,  (b)  The  Elders  were  sometimes  caUed 
by  the  unassuming  name  of  Oterseers  (iiria-Konoi)^  an  appellation  more  con- 
sonant with  Grecian  customs,  and  first  adopted  in  Grecian  congregations. 


Chron.  II.  ad  Olymp.  218 ;  Hieron.  ep.  86.  (aL  27.)  ct  Phil.  4,  22.  ff)  I^u^eb.  Hist.  ecc.  Ill,  !&  h)  On 
the  other  hand :  Kettner,  die  Agape  o.  d.  geheime  Woltband  der  Christen  von  Kleme&s  in  Bomi 
enter  Domitian  gestiflet  Jena.  1819. 

a)  AcU  11,  2a  21, 10&     h)  Acts  6, 1-10. 


CHAP.  IL    APOST.  CUUBCH.    |  42.  GONSTTnTTIOK.    |  4&  LIFE.  39 

Both  titles  were  as  yet  used  indiscriminately^  althongb  in  consequence  of  the 
personal  influence  of  some  who  presided  in  the  churches,  especially  of  Jeru- 
salem, the  way  may  have  been  prepared  even  then,  for  the  distinction  which 
became  so  decided  and  general  in  the  first  ten  years  of  the  next  century,  (e) 
The  officers  of  each  church  were  chosen  by  the  people,  or  with  the  consent 
of  the  people  were  installed  over  them  by  those  who  organized  them  into  a 
church.  Although  the  office  of  a  public  teacher  must  have  seemed  most  im- 
portant, and  the  necessity  of  well  qualified  instructors  must  have  been 
urgent,  (d)  it  does  not  appear  that  any  persons  were  at  first  set  apart,  exclu- 
sively for  that  duty,  («)  and  every  thing  like  a  hierarchy  was  excluded  by 
the  universal  acknowledgment  that  all  believers  were  members  of  a  general 
priesthood.  (/)  It  was  looked  upon  as  a  matter  of  conscience,  that  all  civil 
salts  should  be  settled  by  arbitrators  selected  from  the  church  itself.  (^)  After 
the  excitement  of  the  first  establishment  of  the  church  had  subsided,  women 
once  more  returned  to  a  silent  submission  to  the  word  of  God,  and  to  the 
performance  of  their  proper  duties  in  the  domestic  circle.  But  in  addition 
to  the  Deaeonenes^  who  were  employed  in  charitable  offices  among  the  women, 
there  were* probably,  even  then,  some  female  presbyters  or  widows^  for  the 
supervision  and  instruction  of  the  younger  persons  of  their  own  sex.  (h) 
Every  one  who  applied  for  admission  to  the  Ohurch  was  immediately  re- 
ceived, but  those  who  were  subsequently  found  guilty  of  gross  offences  were 
excluded  by  the  action  of  the  congregation.  In  the  management  of  its  pub- 
lic affairs  each  congregation  was  an  independent  society,  but  by  spiritual  fel- 
lowship, and  the  influence  of  distinguished  travelling  teachers,  all  the  con- 
gregations were  so  connected  together,  as  collectively  to  form  one  great  king- 
dom of  God,  of  which  even  in  the  time  of  Paul,  Jerusalem  was  regarded  as 
the  centre.  The  supreme  law  was  love,  and  the  sovereign  power  was  exer- 
cised by  the  Holy  Ghost. 

§  48.    EcclesuMtical  Life, 

Arnold^  erate  Liebe  d.  L  wahre  Abbildang  d.  ereten  Christen.  Frnkf.  169<S.  £  «&  oft ;  Stick f I  et 
Bogenhard,  Biga  oommontt  de  moroU  primAevorom  Cbristianorum  conditlone,  Xcost  ad  0.  lS2d. 

As  the  Church  at  Jerusalem  grew  up  out  of  the  original  company  of  the 
apostles,  the  common  fund  which  had  existed  in  the  latter,  suggested  the 
bold  thought  of  a  community  of  gooda  Although  such  a  project  was  much 
fiusilitated  by  the  enthusiastic  brotherly  love  then  prevalent,  and  an  expecta- 
tion that  all  existing  relations  were  soon  to  be  overthrown,  it  was  never  com- 
pletely carried  out,  and  this  congregation  was  soon  in  need  of  the  charities 
of  Christians  in  foreign  countries,  (a)  A  hypocritical  vanity  which  occurred 
in  a  form  not  very  uncommon  in  religious  circles,  was  visited  with  a  terrible 

c)  dc  »d  Attic  VII,  11;  Acta  20,  17.  23;  Phil,  1,  1;  1  Pet.  6,  Is.;  Ofwi.  Jiom.  ad  Cor. 
c  42.  44;  Etrmae  Past  L  2.  A\~-BU>nd€ly  Apologia  pro  eententia  Hier.  de  Episc.  Amst  1616.  4; 
GdbUr,  de  Episoopta primae  ecc  Jen.  1805.  4.   d)  Acts  6,  2 ;— /.  Tim.  8,  2.  6,  IT;  //  Tim.  2.  24 

e)  FarMger^  Da.  de  munerib.  ecc  tempore  A  pp.  Lpa.  1776.  4;  Gabler,  examlnatur  Forbl- 
geri  sent  de  Proeb.  Jen.  1812.  4.  2  Pgg.  /)  I.  Pet.  2,  9.  5,  8,  cf.  Rom.  12»  1.  g)  J.  Oor.  6,  1-& 
cC  Matt  18,  ISea.  A)  Acta  2. 17.  21,  9.— Rom.  16, 1.-7%  2, 8;  /.  Tim.  6,  9;  Cone.  Laod.  can.  11 ; 
(JTaiMi,  Th.  IL  p.  666;.— ira««,  Streitechrr.  P.  2,  p.  858a. 

a)  AeU  4,  82hl  cC  IS,  18.— JfoaAtfim,  de  vera  natnra  oommanionis  bonorum  in  Ecc.  Hier.  (Daa. 


40  AKCIENT  CnURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  L    DIV.  I    TILL  A.  D.  100. 

divine  retribntion.  (h)    The  ordinary  mode  of  life  in  each  congregation  pre- 
sented many  points  of  comparison  with  that  which  existed  among  the 
Eseenes.  (c)    Christians  regarded  themselves,  in  contrast  with  the  world,  as 
the  consecrated  people  of  God.    Every  intellectual  faculty,  according  to  its 
peculiar  nature,  was  enlisted  in  the  service  of  the  kingdom  of  Gk)d,  and  when 
exalted  by  the  common  spirit  of  the  Church,  was  looked  upon  as  a  gracious 
gift  of  the  Holy  Ghost.    Hence,  while  there  were  many  gifts,  there  was  but 
one  Spirit.    The  most  remarkable  of  these  gifts  was  the  power  of  miracu- 
lously healing  the  sick,  at  first  more  especially  exercised  by  Peter,  but  after- 
wards supposed  to  be  a  permanent  possession  of  the  Church.    The  Holy 
Ghost  was  regarded  as  the  common  spirit  of  the  whole  Church,  proceeding 
directly  from  Christ,  awakening  and  appropriating  to  its  use  the  sacred  en- 
thusiasm of  each  individual.    The  external  manifestations  of  this  spirit  were 
sometimes  genuine  exhibitions  of  divine  power,  but  were  sometimes  con- 
founded with  the  fanatical  irruptions  of  a  high  religious  excitement,  and  in 
all  cases  were  regarded  as  fulfilments  of  a  prophetic  metaphor  of  Messianic 
prophecy,  (d)    The  sincere  piety  which  generally  prevailed,  however,  did  not 
always  prevent  the  pride  which  flatters  itself  on  account  of  its  external  ser- 
vices, nor  did  the  extraordinary  brotherly  love  which  the  great  body  of 
Christians  exhibited,  entirely  suppress  some  manifestations  of  envy  and  party 
spirit.    When  persecution  was  expected,  it  was  not  uncommon  for  some 
among  the  Jewish  Christians  to  save  themselves  by  apostacy,  and  among  the 
Gentile  portion  of  the  Church  sins  were  sometimes  committed  which  were 
regarded  as  unpardonable,  (e)    Even  when  Christian  morality  had  been  in- 
fluenced by  Jewish  views  of  personal  purity,  it  had  much  to  contend  with  in 
the  sensuality  of  the  Greeks.    Fastings  and  abstinences,  which  had  been  re- 
garded from  a  period  of  great  antiquity,  as  conducive  to  a  pious  disposition, 
together  with  some  festivals,  were  very  soon  introduced  into  the  Christian 
Church.    Paul,  it  is  true,  rejected  them  when  any  attempted  to  enforce  them 
as  a  matter  of  legal  obligation,  or  of  personal  merit,  but  he  looked  upon  vir- 
ginity as  a  very  desirable  condition,  and  expressed  an  inferior  regard  for  the 
married  state.  (/)    No  change  was  required  in  the  social  relations  of  life,  but 
they  were  exalted  by  higher  motives  and  principles.  (^)     All  hope  of  an 
earthly  theocracy  was  apparently  destroyed  by  the  death  of  Jesus,  but  Chris- 
tians generally  believed  that  Christ  was  to  return  to  the  world  a  second  time, 
and  many  indulged  the  hope  that  they  would  live  to  witness  his  advent.   This 
faith  gave  birth  to  the  boldest  expectations,  partaking  generally  of  a  sensuous 
character,  and  while  it  seemed  a  national  necessity,  and  a  religious  consola- 
tion to  the  Jewish,  it  was  a  source  of  anxiety  and  perplexity  to  the  Grecian 
congregations,  (h) 

§  44.    Mode  of  Worship, 

The  devotional  exercises  of  the  Christian  assemblies,  like  those  of  the 
Jewish  synagogues,  consisted  principally  of  prayers,  singing  of  hymns,  and 

ad  It  ecc  Alton.  1743.  Tb.  IL)  I)  Acts  S,  1-11.  e)  Comp.  Ofrbrm',  Geacb.  d  Urchr.  IIL  p.  SSSh. 
d)  Acts  2, 16-18;  /.  Cor.  13,  4. 14,  Iss.  e)  Utb.  «,  4aa.  10,  25a8.~/.  Jo.  fi,  1«.  /)  /.  Oor.  7, 1«.  88m. 
g)  Ei>.  ad  Philemon,  h)  After  the  Apocalypse,  MaUh.  18,  28 ;  /.  Oor,  15,  62 ;  Phil  4»  6 ;  Btlb,  10, 87 ; 
/.  c^.  8, 18;  Jam^  6,  8 ;  /.  Pet  4,  6.—//.  Thet$.  8. 


CHAP.  IL    APOST.  OHUSGH.    |  44.  WOBSHIP.    |  40.  DOCTRINES.  41 

sacred  disconrses,  founded  upon  portions  of  the  Old  Testament.  Apostolio 
epistles  were  read  in  the  congregation,  to  which  they  had  been  originally  di- 
rected, bnt  after  a  single  reading  they  were  generally  laid  aside.  Every  one 
who  had  the  power  and  the  inclination  to  speak  in  public,  was  allowed  to  do 
80  with  freedom.  Baptism  as  an  initiatory  rite  was  performed  simply  in  the 
name  of  Jesns.  (a)  The  love-feast,  in  which  were  combined  the  ordinary 
meal  and  the  religions  service  of  the  primitive  Christians,  was  originally  cele- 
brated in  Jerusalem  every  day.  At  its  condui^on  the  broken  bread  and  the 
consecrated  cup  was  passed  around  to  every  one  at  the  table,  (b)  In  the  Jew- 
ish Christian  congregations  the  Jewish  Sabbath  and  festivals  were  observed. 
Paul  denied  that  any  one  was  bound  by  positive  law  to  show  a  preference  of 
one  sacred  day  above  another,  (e)  Only  in  congregations  composed  princi- 
pally of  Greeks,  oould  the  members  be  Induced  to  observe  Sunday  in  oom- 
memoradon  of  our  Lord^s  resurrection,  (d)  and  among  them  no  interest  could 
be  awakened  in  those  Jewish  festivals,  which  were  not  connected  with  some 
event  of  the  Christian  history,  to  give  them  additional  importance.  It  is, 
however,  not  easy  to  explain  why  even  Paul  and  John  should  have  discon- 
tinoed  in  such  congregations  the  eating  of  the  paschal  kmb,  according  to  the 
usage  of  their  forefinthers.  (e) 

i  45.    Doctrines  of  the  Church, 

No  public  sentiment  upon  definite  articles  of  Christian  faith  had  yet  been 
formed,  bnt  in  addition  to  those  generally  received  maxims  of  piety,  which 
in  some  instances  had  been  handed  down  from  the  lips  of  Jesus,  and  in  others 
had  been  gradually  developed  in  the  course  of  free  discussion,  the  whole  sys- 
tem of  Jewish  faith  passed  over  into  the  Christian  Church,  and  was  received 
as  divine.  The  only  condition  of  admission  to  the  Church,  was  a  promise  to 
live  a  new  life,  and  an  acknowledgment  of  Jesus  as  the  Messiah.  In  this  ac- 
knowledgment free  scope  was  given  to  all  those  views  of  the  nature  of  the 
Keisiah,  which  prevailed  among  the  people,  from  a  simple  recognition  of  him 
as  the  Son  of  David,  and  a  man  filled  with  the  Spirit  of  God,  to  a  belief  in 
him  as  an  angel,  and  an  impersonation  of  some  one  of  the  attributes  of 
Jehovah.  In  the  view  of  the  Greeks  the  Messianic  ofiSoe  had  no  special  sig- 
nificance, and  Christ  was  to  them  simply  the  Lord,  and  the  Son  of  God.  As 
fur  as  the  reception  of  the  doctrine  of  the  Holy  Ghost  may  be  regarded  as  an 
indication  of  the  development  of  Christianity  at  this  period,  the  views  of  the 
Church  may  be  inferred  from  the  baptismal  formula,  which  was  a  simple  ex- 
prearion  of  faith  in  the  divine  Father,  Son,  and  Spirit  (Matth.  28, 19).  This 
whole  transaction  was  a  thoroughly  practical  matter,  and  admitted  of  a  great 
variety  of  views. 

a)  Act»  8,  88.  8, 18. 10, 48 ;  Rom,  8, 8.  b)J,T.F.  Drtseher^  de  vett  ChrirtlADoram  Agapia.  Ofeas. 
18S1  e)  OaL  4,  9m.  ;  a>2L  i,  16;  Bom,  14,  5;  oomp.  /  Oor,  5,  6st. ;  Comp.  Jattin.  a  Tryph.  c  10, 
11  d)  ^<3te  20,  7;  /.  Cor.  18,  3;  Rev.  1, 10;  Bamab.  c  15.— C'.  C.  L.  Franke,  de  die!  domlnioi 
•pad  vett  Christ  Mlebratione,  HtL  1826;  (Commtt  teL  ed.  VoU>eding.  1S16.  Tb.  L  P.  I.)  e)  Acta 
tfl^fin;  ^uMft.  H.  eoe. y,  24. 


42  ANCIENT  CnUECH  HISTORY.    PKB.  L    DIY.  IL    A.  D.  100-612. 


DIVISION  II.-FORMATION  OF  THE  CATHOLIC  CHURCH. 

CHAP.   L— STRUGGLE  OF  THE  CHURCH  FOR  ITS  OWN  EXIST- 

ENCE. 

LactanthiM^  de  mortlb.  persecutorum,  ed.  Bavldri^  TraJ.  ad.  Bh.  1698.  and  often.  [This  work 
is  transl  by  Bp.  Snrnft.  Lend.  1718.  8.]— C  KortKoU,  de  peraeqaatlonib.  eoc  piimaeyae  (Jen.  1660), 
Kllon.  16S9.  4;  Transl  into  Germ. ;  Beschr.  d.  10  grossen  Yerfolgg.  Hamb.  1698;  Gibbon^  Dedlne 
and  Fall  of  tlie  Koni.  Emp.  I»nd.  17766S.  6  vola.  4,  and  often.  [With  notea  bj  MUman  and 
Gui*(tt.  New  York.  1S4S.  4  vula.  8.]  Transl.  into  Ocrm.  by  Wenk^  and  others.  Lps.  178868.  10  vob.; 
the  16th  chap.  rof>pecting  the  prop,  of  Chr.  by  natural  cansea,  transL  by  A.  F.  «.  Walterstem,  Ilamb. 
178S;  G.  A.  Ottiander,  Ausbreit  d.  Chrlstenth.  (Sti&udlin's  n.  Tzschlmer's  Arch,  vol  4.  sect  2);  /T. 
G.  7k«cA<m«r,  dcr  Fall  des  Ilcidenth.  Lps.  1829.  1  voL ;  A.  Beugnot^  Hist  de  U  destmctlon  du  pa- 
ganismo  en  Occident  Tor.  1S8&  2  vols.    {A.  NiUchl^  d.  Entsteh.  der  Altkath.  K.  Bonn.  1850.] 

§  46.     The  Jem. 
Zunz^  die  Gottesdienstl  Yortr.  d.  Jad.  hist  entwickelt  BrL  1832.  comp.  (  40. 

Uninstructcd  by  the  past,  and  nnhnmbled  by  defeats,  the  Jews  contended 
against  their  fate  (after  115),  and  from  Western  Africa  to  Asia  Minor,  insarrec- 
tions  rolled  over  the  land,  always  to  be  quelled  in  Jewish  blood.  That  he 
might  not  be  compelled  to  pnt  the  whole  nation  to  death,  Hadrian  resolved 
to  destroy  its  nationality.  The  people  were  forbidden  to  observe  their  Sab- 
baths, and  circumcision  was  punished  as  a  crime  probably  as  emasculation,  {a) 
and  on  the  ruins  of  Jerusalem  a  city  consecrated  to  Jupiter  was  built,  and  in 
honor  of  that  divinity  and  of  the  emperor  was  called  Aelia  Capitolina, 
When  reduced  to  extremity,  the  nation  was  called  to  arms  (182)  by  Bar 
Coehha^  L  e,  the  Son  of  a  Star,  (h)  who  professed  to  be  the  promised  Messiah^ 
and  was  acknowledged  to  be  such  by  the  distinguished  Rabbi  Akiba.  He 
succeeded  in  conquering  Jerusalem,  and  in  consequence  of  his  heroic  but 
sanguinary  exploits,  Palestine  became  once  more  free.  But  after  all  the  hor- 
rors and  vicissitudes  of  a  three  years'  war,  Julius  Seterus  got  possession,  by 
storm,  of  Bethar^  the  last  fortress  of  this  Messiah's  kingdom.  The  impostor 
himself  fell  in  the  battle.  The  whole  of  Palestine  had  become  a  desert 
Every  Jew  was  forbidden,  under  penalty  of  death,  to  set  foot  within  the  holy 
city.  Those  Christians  who  remained  in  Palestine  suffered  much  during  this 
struggle,  not  only  from  the  Romans,  by  whom  they  were  frequently  treated 
as  Jews,  but  still  more  from  the  followers  of  the  false  Messiah,  because  they 
refused  to  follow  him  in  his  efforts  to  save  their  conmion  country,  (r)  These 
national  misfortunes  were  regarded  by  the  Jews  as  divine  judgments  for  their 
indifference  to  the  law  of  their  fathers,  and  had  no  influence  in  diminishing 
their  assurance  of  future  success.  Schools  of  learning  were  established,  to 
serve  as  spiritual  courts,  and  centres  of  influence  for  the  nation  in  its  general 
dispersion.     Genuine  Babhinism  was  formed  on  the  ruins  of  the  older  sects 

a)  SpaHlanU  Hadr.  a  14.  conap.  Digeti.  XLVIIL  Ut  8.  fir.  11 ;  Nor.  Jost  142.  e.  1.  h)  Num. 
24, 17.  After  his  failure  he  was  called:  K2'«ti3  "13  ,  fillus  mendaolL  c)  I.  Dio  Com.  LXVIII, 
82;  LXIX,  12s8.;  Eweb.  II.  ecc  IV,  2.  6;  Ju^tini,  Ap.  L  c  81.— IL  Deyling,  Aeliae  Capu  Oil- 
gines  et  Uist  Lps.  1743 ;    M&nUr.  der  JGd.   Kricg  nnter  Tn^KCi  n.   Iladr.  Altona  a.  Lpa  1821. 


CHAP.  L    STBUGGLE  OF  CHBISTIANITT.    |  4A.  JUDAISM.    |  47.  B0MAN9.     43 

at  Tiberias^  in  the  school  of  Hillel,  in  which  the  Mosaic  law,  in  its  utmost 
extent,  though  partially  acconunodated  to  the  times,  was  taught  hj  a  class 
of  teachers  permanently  set  apart  to  this  work.  The  traditions  of  the  scrihes 
here  reduced  to  writing  {Mithnay  ahout  220),  with  explanations  (Gemara^  in 
the  4th  cent.),  constituted,  in  subsequent  times,  the  principal  book  for  in- 
struction and  religious  law  (Talmud),  A  still  greater  influence  was  after- 
wards acquired  by  the  schools  on  the  Euphrates,  in  which  the  Babylonian 
Talmud  was  composed  of  the  same  general  materials  (430  till  621),  and  be- 
came more  generally  esteemed,  on  the  ground  that  it  was  a  more  distinct 
form  of  modem  Judaism.  The  Jews,  who  were  the  sources  of  all  the  calum- 
nies heaped  upon  Christ  and  the  Church,  knew  very  well  how  to  excite  the 
same  hatred  against  the  Christians  of  which  they  were  themselves  the  vie- 
tims.  (d)  The  feelings  of  Christians  with  respect  to  the  Jews  still  remained 
of  a  contradictory  character.  In  a  dialogue  of  Justin^  in  which  the  author 
replies  to  the  objections  of  a  candid  Jew  against  the  vocation  of  Jesus,  and 
the  transitory  nature  of  the  divine  law,  the  position  is  assumed,  that  the  Mo- 
saic precepts  and  institutions  were  only  prefigurations  and  symbols  either  of 
what  Christ  did,  or  of  what  happened  to  him  and  his  followers,  (e)  It  was 
even  then  asserted,  that  Christianity  had  been  rejected  by  the  people  among 
whom  it  originated,  and  that  the  few  who  had  embraced  it  were  by  no  means 
the  most  faithful  and  consistent  Christians.  (/)  The  proo£i  adduced  by 
Cyprian  are  a  collection  of  pertinent  and  impertinent  passages  of  Scripture, 
to  show  that  the  Jews  were  to  be  cast  off,  and  that  all  the  prophecies  either 
had  been  or  would  be  fulfilled  by  Christ.  (^) 

§  47.  ne  Roman  People  and  Empire, 

KifHhoU,  PagBDiu  obtrecUtor,  Kilon.  1693.  A\J.J.  Jlulderici,  Q«Dtlli8  obtr«etator,  Tlgnr.  1744; 
Pap$t,  do  culpa  Christianor.  in  roxatt  motis  a  Bom.  ErL  1789.  8  Pgg.  4 ;  N&nter,  die  Cbristin  &n 
hetdnischen  Hause  Tor  Constantin,  Kopenh.  182S. 

From  the  time  of  Trajan,  the  Roman  people  had  been  accustomed  in  a 
tumultuous  manner  to  demand  that  Christians  should  be  put  to  death.  This 
proceeded  originally  from  persons  who  either  derived  their  support  from  some 
connection  with  idolatry,  or  found  their  principal  honor  or  pleasure  in  the 
cultivation  of  pagan  literature.  But  internally  decayed,  as  heathenism  then 
was,  it  could  never  have  awakened  such  a  powerful  opposition,  and,  in  the 
course  of  the  struggle,  have  won  for  itself  once  more  a  high  degree  of  attach- 
ment, merely  by  appeals  in  behalf  of  the  old  idolatry.  The  whole  common 
feeling  of  the  ancient  world,  and  the  chief  glory  of  the  present  life,  was  as- 
sailed by  Christianity,  and  the  people  saw  nothing  proposed  in  return  but  a 
severe  and  cheerless  system  of  virtue,  in  which  the  world  was  rendered  a 
desert,  that  an  uncertain  heaven  might  be  won.  The  hatred  thus  awakened 
endeavored  to  jostify  itself  by  suspicions.  The  spiritual  worship  of  an  in- 
visible God  was  denounced  as  atheism ;  participation  in  the  sacred  body  of 

d)  JutUn.  c.  Trypb.  o.  Ite. ;  TnrM.  ad  nation.  I,  14  «)  AtcUoyor  irphs  Tpv<pwya  'IovScuok 
Ed.  Jdtb,  Lond.  1719;  0pp.  recJ.  a  T.  Otto,  Jen.  1S428.  Th.  IL ;— Jrfin«cA<r,  an  Dial  a  Trjrph. 
Jnatino  mete  adacribatar?  (Oommentt  tbeol.  ed.  Bosenmaeller,  Lpa.  1S20.  Tb.  L  P.  2,  p.  18481.) 
/)  JuBtinif  ApoL  L  e.  58.    g)  TesUmoniomm  adv.  Jadaeoa,  L  IIL 


44  ANCIENT  CnUBCH  HI8T0BT.    PER.  L    DIY.  II.    A.  D.  100-31& 

Christ  was  represented  as  a  Thyestean  feast ;  the  privacy  of  the  Christian 
semblies  was  looked  upon  as  a  doak  for  conspiracy,  and  for  secret  crimes ; 
and  the  fraternal  fellowship  which  generally  prevailed  among  Christians,  was 
suspected  as  the  result  and  the  occasion  of  unnatural  lasciviousness.  The  re- 
proaches heaped  upon  each  other  by  the  Church  and  the  various  Christiaa 
sects,  (a)  and  the  confessions  wrung  by  torture  from  heathen  slaves,  with  re- 
spect to  their  Christian  masters,  (h)  appeared  to  confirm  the  suspicions  of 
those  who  were  anxious  to  find  evidences  of  guilt.  The  public  misfortunea 
in  which  that  age  abounded,  were  all  regarded  as  divine  judgments  for  the 
dishonor  done  to  the  offended  gods.  But  to  persons  of  distinction,  and  to 
those  who  had  been  educated  in  the  spirit  of  the  times,  Christianity  appeared 
to  be  a  dark  superstition  of  an  infatuated  rabble.  The  magistrates  were,  in- 
deed, frequently  induced  to  persecute  Christians,  by  the  clamors  of  the  mul- 
titude, and  by  their  own  passions ;  but  the  true  reason  for  it  was  to  be  found 
in  motives  of  state  policy.  Christians  looked  upon  it  as  dangerous  to  take 
the  oath  of  allegiance  which  the  soldiers  were  obliged  to  receive,  or  to  per- 
form the  duties  of  any  public  or  civil  office,  (r)  although  many  overcame 
their  religious  scruples  from  a  regard  to  personal  advantages  or  feelings  of 
duty.  Although  they  generally  submitted  to  every  outrage  infiicted  upon 
them  by  the  magistrates,  whom  they  regarded  as  appointed  by  God,  their 
vast  number  and  mutual  fellowship  rendered  them  formidable  to  the  civil 
authorities.  Indeed,  this  consciousness  of  their  own  power,  and  their  con* 
viction  that  the  empire  was  destined  to  a  speedy  overthrow  were  so  openly 
expressed,  (d)  that  their  assurances  of  fidelity  and  loyalty  appeared  quite  sus- 
picious. At  all  events,  the  State  was  torn  by  dissensions,  and  as  long  as 
any  hope  remained  of  overcoming  Christians  by  terror,  sanguinary  measures 
were  looked  upon  as  likely  to  result  in  good.  The  fate  of  Christians  was,  it 
is  true,  determined  by  the  imperial  edicts  in  every  part  of  the  empire,  but  it 
was  rendered  mild  or  severe  according  to  the  popular  sentiment  in  each  pro- 
vince and  the  personal  feelings  of  the  local  magistrate. 

§  48.     Conduct  of  the  Individual  Emperors  during  (he  Second  and  Third  Cen^ 

turies. 

Franc  Balduini,  Commtr.  ad  edlota  vett  prince  Rom.  de  Chrtstianls,  HaL  ITST.  4 ;  C.  J>.  A, 
Martini^  PeneeatioDeB  Chrlstianoram  sub  Impp.  Rom.  Roetoch.  1802b.  8  Comm.  4;  Sdmmatm 
fr.  ManMQg^  die  Verfolgungen  d.  enten  obriaa  Kirche.  Vlen.  ISSl ;  O.  &  Xdpt^,  de  atatn  at  ooodit. 
CbriAtianoram  aub  Impp.  Rom.  altariua  port  Chr.  &b6C  Bar.  1628. 

1.  A  noble  race  of  emperors,  in  whom  the  Greek  and  Roman  spirit  waa 
once  more  revived,  were,  in  the  old  Roman  style,  either  indifferent  or  severe 
in  their  treatment  of  Christianity.  A  rescript  of  Tn^An  (98-117),  in  reply 
to  some  inquiries  of  Plinius  (about  110)  respecting  the  conduct  to  be  pursued 
towards  Christians,  directed  that  they  should  not  be  sought  after  by  the  civil 
authorities,  but  that  all  legally  arraigned  by  accusers  before  the  courts,  were 


a)  Tartal.  da  jejun.  a  IT ;  OUm.  Strom.  IIL  p.  511 ;  JTiMak  H.  aoa  I V,  T.  h)  Euseb.  II.  aoa  VI, 
1.  c)  Tertul  de  oor.  c  11;  Apologet  o.  88;  de  Palllo,  o.  5;  BtHnart,  Aote  Martjr.  od.  2.  p.  2Ma 
<f)  Tfrtul,  Apolofret  c.  8T.  Tba  Apocalj-pae  of  John,  and  maoy  tbinga  In  tbe  Sibylline  botik^  bad 
already  announced  tbeae. 


CHAP.  L    BTBUGGLES  OF  CHBIBTIAinTT.    |  48.  SOMAN  EMPEBOES.         45 

either  to  be  pardoned  if  thej  denied  the  charge  or  repented,  or  ^ven  over 
to  death  if  they  continued  obstinate.  He  however  allowed,  that  no  uniform 
mle  conld  be  prescribed  in  this  matter.  So  many  of  them  in  Bithynia  and 
Pontns  were  induced  to  inyoke  the  gods,  to  anathematize  Christ,  and  to  honor 
the  statue  of  the  emperor  with  offerings  of  wine  and  incense,  that  Pliny  in- 
dulged the  hope  that,  by  a  skilftd  combination  of  mildness  and  severity,  he 
would  soon  be  able  to  put  an  end  to  this  superstition,  (a)  The  aged  Symeon^ 
the  son  of  Cleopas,  and  the  successor  of  James  at  Jerusalem,  being  accused 
before  Atticua,  the  governor  of  the  city,  of  being  a  Oliristian,  and  of  the 
fiunily  of  David,  was  crucified  (107),  (b)  and  Ignativs^  Bishop  of  Antioch, 
alter  a  personal  audience  with  the  emperor,  was  torn  to  pieces  by  lions  in 
the  Odiseum,  for  tiie  amusement  of  the  Boman  people  (116).  (e)  About 
this  time,  the  people  began  at  their  festivals,  or  in  time  of  public  calamity, 
to  demand  the  blood  of  Ohristians.  Hadrian  (117-188)  and  Antoninus  Pitts 
(ldS-161)  therefore  checked  these  tumultuous  proceedings,  by  directing  that 
the  strict  forms  of  law  belonging  to  the  usual  trials  should  be  observed,  (d) 
The  stoical  repugnance  which  Marcus  Aurelius  (161-180)  felt  toward  the  en- 
thusiasm of  the  Christians,  induced  him  to  allow  the  popular  hatred  in  south- 
ern Gaul  and  Asia  Minor  to  have  its  fhll  career  of  blood,  {e)  Polycarpy 
]^8hop  of  Smyrna,  the  kst  living  relic  of  Apostolic  days,  died  (169)  at  the 
stake,  because  he  refused  to  curse  the  Lord  whom  he  had  faithfully  served 
for  86  years.  (/)  The  miracle  of  the  Legio  /ulminatrix  (174)  was  either  not 
important  enough,  or  not  sufficiently  authenticated,  to  turn  the  philosophic 
emperor  from  his  course,  (g)  2.  Until  some  time  in  the  middle  of  the  third 
oentury,  the  emperors  were  either  indifferent  or  favorable  to  Christianity ; 
but  as  the  ancient  laws  still  remained  unrepealed,  its  adherents  were  depend- 
ent npom  the  caprice  of  the  municipal  governors.  The  wanton  cruelty  of 
Commodus  (180-192)  was  softened  to  mildness  with  respect  to  Christians, 
by  the  influence  of  his  paramour  Marcia^  and  yet  Apollonius  was  put  to 
death,  principally,  however,  on  account  of  his  eloquent  apology  for  Christian- 
ity before  the  Senate.  His  accuser  was  executed  at  an  earlier  period,  per- 
haps as  his  slave.  (A)  Septimius  Severus  (192-211)  merely  prohibited  the 
furtiier  propagation  of  Christianity,  (t)  The  enmity  which  GaracaUa 
(211-217)  bore  toward  the  whole  human  race,  amounted  only  to  indifference 
wHh  respect  to  the  Church.  (Jc)  The  effeminate  pleasure  which  Heliogabalus 
(218-222)  took  in  oriental  systems  of  religion,  operated  favorably  in  behalf 
of  Christianity.  {T)    With  a  nobler  appreciation  of  its  spiritual  nature,  Aleo 


a)  FUnii,  Epp.  X.  p.  96e.  (al  97s.);  TertuL  Apologet  c.  2;  Euaeb.  TL.  ecc.  Ill,  \Z\— Hater- 
taat,  Yeitheldlgiing  der  Plln.  Briefe  a.  d.  Cbrlsten,  G5tt  178a  h)  Eu§d>.  H.  oca  III,  82,  oomp.  11. 
iAer  Heg8slppti&  c)  EuMb,  H.  eoc.  Ill,  26 ;  Acta  martyril  Ignat  in  Buinart,  p.  Sas.  d)  Jwtini^ 
ApoL  L  c  68;  Btf^n,  H.  eco.  lY,  9;  EitMb.  H.  ecc.  IV,  26;  comp.  S^xxrtiani^  Hadr.  a  22.  On  the 
flpnriotumees  of  the  Edlctnm  od  CkHnmano  Aslae  in  Euaeb.  IT,  18,  and  JmL  L  c  consolt  Uaffnery 
de  fidicto  Aatonini  pro  Christ  Argent  1781.  4.  «)  Marcut  Atir,  irphs  iavT6w  XI,  8 ;  Euseh.  H. 
«ML  Y,  1-a.  /)  Ecdesiae  SntTmensls  de  xnartyrio  Polycorpi  Ep.  EnoycL  in  Eu§eb.  H.  ecc  IV,  15. 
A  fbHar  reoenaioci  In  Suiiutrty  p.  81s&  g)  TertiU,  Apologet  c  6 ;  Eueeb.  H.  eoa  Y,  6.  For  the 
▼towB  eBtertalned  by  heathen,  see  Dio  Com.  Epit  XiphlUni  LXXI,  8;  Suidas^  verb.  ^lovXiavhs, 
JM.  OaptMin.  Mare.  Anr.  c  24    A)  Eweb.  H.  eoc.  Y,  21 ;  ffi^ron.  eatal.  c.  42.    0  SpaHiatU,  Se- 

'.  &  17.  oompi  TertuL  ad  BcapoL  c  4.    k)  Tertxd,  ad  ScapnL  &  4    Q  Lantprid,  Heliog;  c.  & 


46  ANCIENT  CHURCH  HI8T0BT.    PEE.  L    DIY.  IL    A.  D.  100-811 

ander  Setenis  (222-285)  placed  tho  statue  of  Christ  among  his  household 
gods,  and  practically  recognized  the  Christian  congregation  at  Rome  as  a 
civil  corporation.  His  mother,  Jnlia  Mammaea,  while  at  Antioch,  took  de- 
light in  the  learning  of  Origen.  (m)  In  the  view  of  Maximinua  the  Thracian 
(285-288),  the  murderer  of  Alexander,  such  favor  was  a  sufficient  reason  for 
persecuting  him  who  had  received  it  Among  those  who  followed  him  in 
rapid  succession  in  the  imperial  throne,  Philip  the  Arabian  (244-249)  was  so 
favorable  to  Christianity,  that  the  report  became  almost  universal,  that  he 
was  himself  a  Christian,  (n)  8.  The  Church  finally  became  so  powerful, 
that  it  became  necessary  either  to  acknowledge  its  legality,  or  to  persecute  it 
with  all  the  power  of  the  empire.  Decius  (249-251)  raised  the  first  general 
persecution,  by  requiring  the  magistrates  to  institute  inquisitorial  proceed- 
ings. Those  who  sustained  office  in  the  Church  directly  met  death,  or  if 
they  fled,  they  purchased  life  with  the  loss  of  property  and  home.  (<?)  To 
this  distressing  period,  popular  tradition  has  assigned  the  commencement  of 
the  slumber  of  the  seven  children  of  Ephesus,  who  did  not  awake  until  the 
time  of  Theodosius  II.  (447),  and  were  then  astonished  to  find  the  persecuted 
sign  of  the  cross  ruling  over  the  imperial  city  and  the  world,  {p)  Galltu 
(251-263)  was  prevented  only  by  the  pohtical  commotions  of  his  reign  from 
completing  the  sanguinary  work  of  his  predecessor.  Valerianus  (258-260), 
after  a  brief  period  of  favor  toward  the  Church,  sought  systematically  to  de- 
stroy it  by  exterminating  its  officers,  {q)  But  Gallienus  (260-268)  gave  peace 
to  the  whole  Church,  by  an  edict  in  which  he  recognized  it  as  a  civil  corpo- 
ration, (r)  Avrelianus  (270-275),  who  at  one  time  had  consented  to  act  as  an 
umpire  between  contending  bishops,  determined  afterwards,  from  heathenish 
scruples,  to  persecute  the  Christians.  His  death  was  effected  by  a  military 
conspiracy  before  the  execution  of  his  purpose,  (s)  and  during  a  long  period  of 
rest,  the  government  appeared  to  have  abandoned  for  ever  the  unequal  con- 
test of  mere  force  in  opposition  to  spiritual  principles. 

§  49.    Internal  History  of  Paganism 

After  the  middle  of  the  first  century,  in  consequence  of  intercourse  with 
the  east,  and  of  the  pressure  of  internal  elements,  the  intellectual  world  made 
considerable  progress.  On  the  one  hand,  with  a  high-wrought  religious  fer- 
vor, it  overpassed  the  proper  limits  of  heathenism,  and  connected  itself  some- 
times with  a  particular  phase  of  Platonism,  and  sometimes  with  the  pure 
and  self-denying  mode  of  life  which  tradition  assigned  to  the  Pythagorean 
system.  On  the  other  hand,  when  it  was  only  partially  aroused,  it  carried 
the  spiritual  element  into  the  world  of  sense,  that  it  might  obtain  a  control 
over  the  latter  by  magical  arts,  and  penetrate  the  mysteries  of  the  world  of 
spirits.  We  therefore  find,  in  the  very  midst  of  great  moral  corruption, 
and  the  dissolution  of  all  social  and  natural  ties,  initiations  into  wonderful 

vn)  Lamprid.  Alex.  8ever.  c  89.  49.  comp.  28.  48. 45;  Eu9eh.  H.  ecc  VI,  21. 88.  n)  Ew^h.  H.  ee& 
VI,  84;  nUron.  Chron.  ad  ann.  248.  o)  Euteb.  H.  ecc  VI,  40-tt;  CypHan^  de  la(Mti^  and  bis  epia* 
ties  written  at  this  time ;  Ladani,  de  mortib.  e.  4.  j>)  Ortgor.  Turon^  de  gloria  Mart  Par.  1640. 
pL  215e.;  RHneccim  de  7  donnlentib.  Lps.  1702.  Banctor.  7  dormientlam  Hist  Bom.  1742L  4 
q)  Eu4eb.  H.  ecc  VII,  lOii ;  Cipriani  Ep.  82.  r)  Eunb.  H.  ecc  VII,  18.  •)  Eu90b.  H.  eoa 
YII,  80;  Laetant  de  mortib.  c  «. 


CHAP.  L    BTBUGGLES  OP  OHEISTIANITT.    {  60.  NEW  PLATONISM.  47 

mysteries,  a  capricious  confidence  in  miracles,  extreme  self-denials,  and  san- 
goinarj  expiations,  (a)  In  the  attempted  union  of  Polytheism  and  Mono- 
theism, the  gods  were  regarded  only  as  different  names  of  the  one  Gbd,  or  as 
the  organs  through  which  he  revealed  himself  to  his  creatures.  Even  the 
Stoa,  by  the  influence  of  EpieUtus  (about  100),  received  a  character  which 
no  longer  sought  virtue  in  perpetual  struggles,  but  in  patient  endurance. 
The  literature  of  that  period,  generally  a  forced  after-growth  of  a  mighty 
nature  then  extinct,  gradually  developed  the  characteristics  of  credulity  and 
guperstition.  Even  as  early  as  the  time  of  Plutarch  (60-120),  with  aJl  his 
enthunasm  for  the  exalted  models  of  antiquity,  his  writings  abound  in  much 
-which  is  fantastic.  Aelian  (about  222)  is  full  of  pious  legends  about  the 
manifestations  of  the  Deity  in  nature  and  in  common  life.  The  spirit  of  the 
age  is  well  reflected  in  the  animated  but  extravagant  writings  of  the  African 
rhetorician  Apuleitta  (about  170),  in  which  are  sensual  thoughts  side  by  side 
with  pious  fanaticism,  and  satires  upon  superstition  mingled  with  supersti- 
tious dreamings.  (b)  This  tendency,  when  it  first  came  in  contact  with 
Christianity,  appropriated  to  itself  many  Christian  elements,  merely  that  it 
might  become  a  better  match  for  its  opponent.  The  real  Apollanius  of  7V~ 
ana  (8796)  travelled  about  in  the  character  of  a  reformer  of  heathenism, 
striving  to  give  to  it  the  character  of  unlimited  faith  which  we  have  de- 
seribed)  and  deceived  many  by  the  strange  revelations  which  he  probably  ac- 
oomplished  by  some  magnetic  clairvoyance,  so  that  he  became  honored  as  a 
prophet,  and  sometimes  even  as  God.  But  in  a  rhetorical  work,  in  which 
Philo9tratu$  (about  280)  professed  to  give  his  life,  and  attempted  to  present 
him  before  the  world  as  the  Christ  of  heathenism,  he  became  the  ideal  of  a  holy 
sage  wonderftilly  honored  by  the  gods,  {c)  On  the  other  hand,  there  were 
some  who  attempted  to  represent  the  mighty  world-spirit  of  the  ancient 
Greek  philosophy,  but  they  uniformly  found,  that  while  aiming  to  personate 
such  a  character  in  one  respect,  they  were  inconsistent  with  it  in  another. 

§  50.    New  Platonism, 

L  PIMni^  Opp.  omnU;  PorphyriilSbet  de  ylUPIotlnl,  ed.  Oremer,  Oxon.  1836.  8  vola  4; 
Tlop^vpiov  pt\o<r6^ov  vphs  MopK^AAoy,  invcnit  notlsqae  ill  Ang.  Mqfu*^  Medlol  1816.— IL 
Among  the  HIstt  of  Phil  especially,  Tennmnann^  vol  Y  L  [His  Manual  is  tnoBl  Oxf.  1882.  &] 
BUUr^  ToL  IT.  [tnnsL  by  Morriaon,  Oxfl  1888.  4  vols.  8;  Henry's  Hist,  of  Phil  2  vols.  N.  Y.  1841.] 
Cremer^  Preptmtio  ad  Plotini  lib.  de  palcbritad.  Heidelb.  1814;  comp.  Stud.  u.  Krit  1S34.  P.  2.  p. 
BSTaft.;  /mm.  FichU^  de  Phil.  noTae  Platonicae  orlglne,  Berl.  1818;  F.  BoutertMk^  Phlloeophorum 
Alexaadr.  to  Noo-PIatonlooram  reoensio,  (Commentt  Soc.  Bcient  Goett  1828.  Tb.  Y.) ;  C.  Stein- 
Kart,  de  dialeeticA  Plotini  ratione,  Numb,  et  Hal  1829;  Ejwtd,  MeleteinaU  Plotiniana,  Hal  1S40.  4; 
J^  Vogi,  Heo-PL  a.  CbriBtenth.  Berl  1886. 1  Th.  {Levofy  Biogr.  Hist  of  Phil  Lond.  4  vols.  18mo. 
vtPIot] 

The  tendency  of  Paganism  on  the  side  of  faith,  and  the  attempt  to  com- 
bine in  one  system  all  the  sources  of  truth,  reached  its  utmost  limit  in  what 

a)  P.  B.  JPUUr^  de  bierarcbla  et  studio  vitae  asceticae  In  sacris  et  mysteriis  Oraecc  Romano- 
nuoqae  latentib.  Havn.  1808,  transl  into  Germ,  in  the  Neacn  Bibl  d.  schonen  Wiss.  vol  LXX. 
I)  Sekiou^r^  Gesch.  d.  alten  Welt  a.  ibrer  Cnltur.  vol  III.  Abth.  8  (1S81.)  p.  188ss.  196s&  c)  Ff^ivii 
HdUMtraU  quae  supersant,  ed.  Kayeer^  Tur.  1844&.  2  Tb.  [The  two  first  books  relating  to  the  life 
«f  ApolL  Tyan.  transL  into  £n^  by  C.  Blount,  fol  Lond.  1680.]  Baur^  Apoll  v.  Tyana  u.  Chris- 
tafl,T&b.l88S. 


48  ANCIENT  CHUBCH  HISTOBY.    FEB.  L    DIT.  IL    A.  D.  100-811 

was  called  New  Platonism.    This  sjetem  had  its  origin  in  the  disoonrses  of 
AmmoniuB  Saceas^  of  Alexandria,  near  the  commencement  of  the  third  c«i- 
tnry,  hut  is  presented  in  its  most  attractive  form  in  the  Enneades  of  Plotinui 
(205-270),  and  Was  best  represented  hy  JarMkhm  in  the  fourth,  and  by  Pr#- 
clus  in  the  fifth  century.    The  masters  of  this  school  were  regarded  as  seen 
and  saints,  who  had  broken  the  bonds  of  a  life  of  sense,  and  even  on  earth 
were  honored  with  the  privUege  of  an  immediate  intuition  of  the  Deity. 
What  Philo  had  undertaken,  they  now  completed,  though  in  a  wider  sense, 
in  behalf  of  paganism.    While  New-PIatonism  took  part  in  the  higher  discus- 
sions and  conclusions  of  philosophy,  it  nevertheless  stood  opposed  to  all  phi- 
losophy, since  it  did  not  profess  to  rest  upon  careftd  inquiries  into  the  eternal 
laws  of  the  spirit,  but  claimed  to  be  a  revelation  from  God.    Thus  exalting 
itself  above  all  such  investigations,  it  became  the  poetry  as  well  as  the  reli- 
gion of  philosophy.    It  attached  itself  more  especially  to  the  system  of  Plato, 
and  professed  to  be  an  explanation  and  a  development  of  his  views,  but  it 
aimed  to  bring  together  the  fundamental  principles  of  all  philosophical 
schools,  and  the  ideas  which  constitute  the  basis  of  all  popular  religionai 
Even  Christianity,  therefore,  was  acknowledged  by  those  who  advocated  this 
system,  but  only  as  it  originally  came  from  the  inspired  soul  of  its  founder. 
It  did  not  at  first  originate  in  a  spirit  hostile  to  Christianity,  and  it  is  even 
doubtful  to  what  extent  Ammonius  and  Porphyry  were  at  one  time  connect- 
ed with  the  Church.    It  is,  however,  certain,  that  it  was  profoundly  affected 
by  the  peculiarities  of  Christianity,  even  while  it  was  struggling  with  that 
system,  during  the  third  century,  for  the  empire  of  the  world.*    The  divinity 
which  it  presents  is  exalted  above  all  human  apprehension,  and  was  called 
simply  the  Self-sufiicient  One  {ro  cV).    From  his  overfiowing  fulness  proceed- 
ed the  Divine  Intelligence,  and  from  this  the  World-Soul,  by  which  the  mate- 
rial universe  is  pervaded  with  divine  life.    Evil  is  only  that  which  is  imper- 
fect, and  is  the  most  distant  reflection  of  Deity  upon  matter.    The  human 
soul  which  had  been  produced  by  the  Divine  Intelligence,  fell,  in  consequence 
of  its  lon^ng  after  earthly  things,  from  its  original  divine  life  to  its  present 
temporal  existence.    It  therefore  belongs  to  the  sensual  as  well  as  to  tho 
intellectual  world.    But  the  souls  of  the  good  and  wise,  even  in  this  world, 
are  in  their  happiest  moments  reunited  with  the  Deity,  and  death  is  to  such 
a  complete  restoration  to  their  home.    From  a  pious  veneration  for  an  an- 
cestry far  back  in  antiquity,  the  Grecian  gods  especially  were  regarded  as 
the  personal  manifestations  of  the  divine  life  in  nature.    Some  of  them  were 
celestial  beings,  and  some  ruled  here  on  earth.    These  earthly  powers  were 
the  national  gods  Oxcptieot,  edydpKat),  subordinate  to  the  Deity,  and  exalted 
above  all  passion.    The  myths  were  therefore,  of  course,  to  be  explmned  al- 
legorically.    The  arts  of  Divination  and  Magic  were  justified  on  the  ground 
of  the  necessary  connection  of  all  phenomena  by  virtue  of  the  unity  of  the 
world-principle.    While,  therefore,  New-Platonism  was  a  new  power,  it  was 

•  EuMh,  H.  ecc.  YI,  19,  and  Pnep.  evang.  XI,  19;  Soorat  H.  eoc.  Ill,  ^—Motheim^  de  studio 
Etbnicor.  Christianoe  imiUmdi  (Das.  ad  Hist  eco.  Alton.  1738) ;  UUmanny  Einflass  d.  Cbrtstantb. 
anf  Porphyr.  (Stad.  a.  Krit  1832.  H.  %.)^Keil,  de  eansis  alien!  Platonicor.  rec.  a  rel  chr.  animi  Lpi. 
1785.  i.  (0pp.  ed.  Goldhom.  Lpa.  1821.  toL  1.) 


CHAP.  L  STRUGGLES  OF  CHRISTIANITY.  J  61.  LITERARY  CONTROVERSIES.   49 

Devertbcless  a  reformation  of  the  old  faith.  Thougli  it  extended  itself  over 
the  whole  Roman  empire,  it  embraced  within  itself  contradictory  elements, 
and  could  maintain  its  existence  only  long  enough  to  witness  and  embellish 
the  downfall  of  heathenism. 

§  51.    Literary  Contratersm  of  Christianity, 

DeOatu  C.  G.  Baumgarien-Cruaitu^  de  scriptoribos  8ae&  II.  qai  novain  reL  Impngnarant,  tcI 
Impugnasae  credantur.  Misn.  1345.  4. 

It  was  not  until  the  age  of  the  Antoninos  that  Christianity  appeared  im- 
portant enough  to  be  the  object  of  literary  discussion,  or  sought  to  defend 
itself  by  literary  weapons.  The  last  discourse  in  which  Fronto  made  an 
attack  upon  Christians,  appears  to  have  been  merely  a  legal  defence  of  the 
proceedings  against  them  under  Marcus  Anrelius.  There  can  be  no  doubt 
that  the  negative  spirit  exhibited  in  the  writings  of  Lucian  exerted  a  favorable 
influence  upon  Christianity,  since  his  mockeries,  like  a  death-warning,  com- 
pletely undermined  all  confidence  in  the  ancient  gods ;  but  he  has  occasionally 
derided  the  Christians  also  as  fanatical  simpletons,  even  while  he  involuntarily 
supplies  evidence  in  favor  of  their  brotherly  love,  and  fortitude  in  death,  (a) 
A  genuine  discourse  of  CeJsus^  written  during  the  persecution  under  Marcus 
Anrelius,  has  been  preserved  in  the  extracts  of  Origen.  (^)  The  author  was 
an  intelligent  man,  but  full  of  pride  and  contempt  for  Christianity.  While 
endeavoring  to  throw  suspicion  upon  its  origin  and  opposing  the  Church  of 
his  ow^n  times,  he  frequently  confounds  it  with  the  vagaries  of  its  different 
sects,  and  collects  nearly  every  thing  which  Judaism  with  its  unfulfilled  ideas 
of  the  Messiah  and  its  calumnious  traditions,  together  with  all  that  pagan 
refinement  with  its  philosophy,  especially  the  Platonic,  could  produce  against 
it.  We  have  also  a  Dialogue  written  by  Minucim  Felix  (§  52),  in  which 
Caeeilivs  brings  forward  the  arguments  generally  urged  by  the  heathen  of 
that  period  against  Christianity.  In  behalf  of  the  Olympic  deities,  it  was  al- 
leged that  history  showed  that  the  gods  had  protected  and  avenged  their 
worshippers ;  that  miracles  had  been  wrought,  and  predictions  by  divination 
had  been  announced  by  their  votaries,  and  that  a  Supreme  Deity  had  always 
been  worshipped  in  connection  w^ith  many  gods.  Against  Christianity  was 
urged ;  its  foreign  and  barbarous  origin,  to  which  all  that  was  national  must 
be  sacrificed,  and  its  recent  origin,  to  which  all  that  was  established  must 
give  way ;  all  that  was  true  or  good  in  Christianity  belonged  still  more  an- 
ciently to  Philosophy,  so  that  the  only  novelty  which  it  possessed  was  a  most 
repulsive  outward  form ;  its  sacred  Scriptures  were  of  doubtful  origin,  and 
frequently  had  been  altered ;  Jesus  was  said  to  have  been  the  ofi&pring  of 
adultery,  instructed  by  magicians  in  Egypt,  and  surrounded  only  by  wretched 
fishermen  and  abandoned  publicans,  to  have  died  in  the  expression  of  unman- 

a)  'AAc^aySpos ^ i/'cvSJ/iorrxT,  c.25.8-<;  TltplrrislifptyplvovrtKtvrriSf  c  11-16;  *AAt}^r 
ItrroplOf  I,  22.  30.  II,  4.  11. — A.  Eich^adii,  Pg.  Lacianns  nom  scripUfl  suIb  a^Jnvare  religionem 
elirtot  Toluerit?  Jen.  1820.  4;  A".  O.  Jacobs  Cbaracteristik  Luclans.  Ilamb.  1S32;  Kikhr^  Luc.  ft 
crlmioe  librornm  sacr.  Irrisoram  llberatnr.  P.  I.  Orimae,  1844.  4  h)  *AAt}i^f  K6yoi.—Feng6r^  de 
Oebo,  Epicurea  Havn.  1828 ;  C  R.  Jachmann^  de  Celso  disserait  et  fragmenU  libri  c  Cbristianoa 
eoQeglt  Regiom.  ISSd.  A\  F.A.  Philippic  de  Celai  philoeopbondi  genere.  BeroL  1886;  Sindemann^ 

4 


50  ANCIENT  CIirRCII  HISTORY.    PER.  L    DIV.  II.    A.  D.  lOO-Mt. 

ly  sorrows,  and  finally  to  have  given  no  proof  of  his  resurrection  except  what 
was  derived  from  his  own  followers.  Against  Christians  it  was  urged :  that 
they  had  deified  a  publicly  executed  malefactor ;  that  they  demanded  a  blind 
faith ;  that  they  invited  to  their  society  those  who  were  sinners  and  criminals, 
while  in  the  heathen  mysteries,  none  were  initiated  but  those  who  were  pure 
in  heart ;  that  the  various  Christian  sects  were  intolerant  towards  each  oth- 
er ;  that  they  were  remarkably  unfortunate ;  and  finally,  that  if  they  were  not 
secret  criminals,  they  shunned  publicity,  and  were  enemies  to  the  eternal 
city  of  Rome.  The  opposition  which  the  New-Platonic  school  made  to  Chris- 
tianity, may  be  considered  as  represented  by  Porphyry  (28ft-805).  (c)  From 
all  that  can  be  learned  by  means  of  a  few  rather  inconsiderable  remains,  he 
appears  to  have  applied  his  censures  principally  to  the  difficult  portions  of 
the  Old  Testament,  and  the  deceptive  character  of  the  allegorical  method  of 
interpreting  them,  to  the  composition  of  the  prophecies  of  Daniel  after  the 
events  to  which  they  relate  had  taken  place,  to  the  contradiction  implied  in 
the  abolition  of  the  divine  law  by  one  who  came  from  God,  to  the  disagree- 
ment between  Peter  and  Paul,  to  the  death  of  Ananias,  and  to  the  misfortune 
of  Jesus,  in  being  so  misunderstood  by  a  company  of  pitiable  fanatics.  Hiero- 
eles  (about  800)  contrasted  the  life  of  ApoUonius  with  that  of  Jesus,  though 
in  the  latter  ho  seems  to  have  mingled  incidents  in  the  history  of  other  Mes- 
siahs of  whom  he  had  heard.  He  was  an  orator  concerned  in  stirring  up  the 
persecution  under  Diocletian,  and  had  permitted  Christians  to  be  put  to 
death,  and  Christian  virgins  to  be  violated,  (d)  All  the  controversial  writ- 
ings of  that  period,  so  far  as  they  were  opposed  to  Christianity,  were  subse- 
quently destroyed  by  the  pious  barbarism  of  the  Christian  emperors,  (e) 

§  62.     TTie  Christian  Apologists. 

L  Apologg.  Christ  0pp.  (e<L  Pntdentlvs  Jfaranus.)  Par.  1742.  t 

II.  Fahriciu^  delectna  argamentorum  et  syllabus  scrlptoram,  qui  veritatom  rel.  chr.  assememnt 
Hamb.  1725.  4;  T^9chim$r^  Oewh.  d.  Apologetik.  Lpa.  1805;  only  1  toI.;  CUttuett,  Apologetae  £c- 
ole»iae  chr.  ante  Theodosianl,  Platonis  cjosqne  philusophiae  arbitrL  Ilafh.  1817;  G.  H.  ^nan  Senden 
Oesch.  (L  ApologeUk.  XJebeni  (from  the  Datch  PraeC  dated  1831)  v.  W.  Quack  u.  B.  Binder.  Stnttg. 
1846.  1  Th. 

'When  the  emperor  Hadrian  was  at  Athens  (about  180)  two  defences  of 
Christianity  were  presented  to  him,  one  by  the  philosopher  Aristides^  and 
another  by  the  Bishop  Quadratus,  The  latter  boasted  that  there  were  some 
among  his  acquaintance  who  had  been  healed,  and  indeed  some  who  had 
been  raised  from  the  dead  by  Jesus,  (a)  The  most  flourishing  period  of 
apologetic  writings  was  during  the  sway  of  the  Antonines,  when  the  Church 
was  quite  as  much  under  the  influence  of  Ifope,  as  of  fear  with  respect  to  its 
external  condition,  and  when  every  opinion  was  allowed  to  be  publicly  ex- 
pressed.   The  Apologies  of  Justin  Martyr^  (b)  written  at  Flavia  Neapolis 


fL  Cel&  u.  B.  Schr.  (Illgen's  Zeitachr.  1842.  P.  2.)  c)  Karcb  Xpiffriayciv  A^yot.— Fragments  may 
beftmnd  in  IMHenii  Ds.  de  vita  et  serlptis  Porph.  Rom.  1680;  (FabrMi  BIbl.  Or.  Th.  lY.  p. 
2078A.)  [Select  Works  of  Porph.  transL  by  Taylor.  Lond.  1828.  8.]  d)  A^ot  9cAaA^;^e4r  irp^t 
Xpia-Ttarovs.  Fragments  in  the  polemical  writings  of  Kuub.  contra  HierocL  liber.— £acfa«i&  de 
mortib.  c  16.     e)  Codae  JutUn.  L  L  tit  1.  const  8w 

a)  £u4eb.  H.  eoa  IV,  8.  comp.  Uieron,  cataL  c.  198l     V)  Apologia  I.  et  II.  ed.  ThaUmann,  Lpt. 
1755;  0pp.  ree.  OUo.  Th.  l.—Arendt,  Krit  Unten.  IL  d.  Schrr.  Just  (Tab.  Qnartalsobr.  1884. 


CHAP.  L    8TBU0GLES  OF  CHRISTIANITY.    |  GL  APOLOGISTd.  51 

under  a  sense  of  nnjust  oppression,  are  yalnablo  rather  for  the  spirit,  than  for 
the  talent  or  caution  displayed  in  them.  Even  after  he  had  become  an  evan- 
gelist, he  still  retained  his  philosopher's  cloak,  and  having  wandered  through 
all  the  existing  schools  of  philosophy,  ho  had  fonnd  peace  at  last  in  the  gos- 
pel of  Christ.  Although  he  disparages  Greek  learning  by  maintaining  that 
it  had  been  borrowed  from  Hebrew  sources,  he  acknowledged  that  what  was 
a  perfect  light  in  Christianity  may  have  been  essentially  the  same  with  the 
dim  revelations  of  the  divine  Spirit  in  the  Grecian  systems.  In  this  way  he 
fonnd  a  point  of  accommodation  by  which  he  could  unite  both  systems  to- 
gether. Occupying  essentially  the  same  ground  with  that  which  had  been 
taken  by  the  apostle  Paul,  he  seems  either  totally  unconscious  of  the  fact,  or 
to  have  regarded  it  with  the  prejudices  of  a  Jewish  Christian,  (r)  The  only 
answer  which  the  philosophical  emperor,  and  perhaps  also  the  cynical  phi- 
losopher Crescens,  who  was  attacked  in  the  second  Apology,  condescended 
to  give,  was  the  execution  of  the  Christian  philosopher  at  Rome  (161-8).  (d) 
His  disciple  Tatianvs  from  Assyria,  wrote  intelligently,  but  with  passionate 
errors  respecting  Greek  customs  and  philosophy,  (e)  The  author  of  the  epis- 
tle to  DicgnetnB  shows  that  he  had  enjoyed  a  Greek  education,  and  that  he 
was  animated  by  a  Christianity  which  was  entirely  a  now  religion.  (/)  Athe- 
nagoroAf  by  mild  and  judicious  appeals  to  Marcus  Anrelius,  attempted  to 
prove  that  Christians  were  innocent  of  the  crimes  imputed  to  them  and  were 
worthy  of  the  imperial  favor,  (j/)  Melito^  Bishop  of  Sardis,  especially  skilled 
in  the  literature  of  the  Old  Testament^  a  eunuch  fbr  the  kingdom  of  heav- 
en's sake,  and  esteemed  by  his  people  as  a  prophet  full  of  the  Holy  Ghost, 
songht  justice  from  the  same  prince  in  behalf  of  a  philosophy  which  had  in- 
deed originated  among  barbarians,  but  had  risen  under  Augustus  as  a  propi- 
tious star  for  the  Boman  empire,  and  had  advanced  simultaneously  with 
it.  (K)  The  three  books  of  Theophilus  of  Antioch  (170-180),  addressed  to 
Antolycus,  contain  a  carefully  written  but  narrowly  conceived  defence  of  the 
Christian  party ;  (/)  and  the  mockeries  heaped  upon  the  philosophers  of  that 
period  by  Hermias^  present  a  superficial  but  witty  caricature  of  the  paradoxi- 
eal  questions  which  engrossed  their  attention.  (Jc)  The  Octavius,  a  colloquy 
written  by  the  African  rhetorician  and  Roman  advocate,  Minucius  Felix,  in 
the  style  of  Cicero,  is  a  clear  and  concise  statement  of  the  real  questions  gen- 


f  SSMIm.);  C  SetnUcK,  J.  d.  Mfirt  Brsl.  1S40b.  2  vols.;  Otto^  de  Jn»t.  Mart  Kfiptls  et  dnctrina.  Jen. 
ISil;  /:  a  BoU,  Q.  d.  Yerh&ltDlss  der  beiden  ApoL  (lllgen's  Zeitachr.  1S4S.  P.  8).  [Art  in  Kitto's 
Jonnud  of  Bibl.  Lit  vol.  V.]  c)  Comp.  howevor,  Otto,  in  IllgenV  Z«itschr.  1S41.  P.  2.  1S42.  P.  2. 
lS4a  P.  1.  d)  C.  Semiwh,  u.  d.  Tode^.  Just  (Stud.  u.  Krit  1885.  P.  4) ;  A.  Stieren,  fi.  d.  T«xle»j. 
Jnrt.  (nigen'6  Zeitachr.  1S42.  P.  1,)  «)  A<{70f  Tpbf  "EAAijvat.  ed.  Worth,  Oxon.  1700.— JZ  A. 
DanMy  Tatltn  der  Apologet  Hal.  1887.  /)  *Ziri<rroX.^  xph$  Ai6yviiTov.  ed.  Bohl,  in  Opp.  Patrnm 
Ml.  Ber.  182(L  P.  L;  Otto^  In  Opp.  Just  Th.  II.— C  D.  a  Orotuhfim,  Comm.  de  Epist  ad  DIo^. 
Lp&  1SSS.  4;  Otto,  de  Epist  ad  Diogn.  Justin!  nomen  prae  se  fercnto.  Jen.  1844.  ff)  nptafifla 
«-rp2  Xpitrrtaymtf.  ed.  Lindner.  Longro»L  lTtA.—Clari69f^  de  Athenagorae  %i(a,  scriptia,  doctr. 
LofiL  1819.  4L  [Athenagoraa,  tranaL  into  Eng.  with  notes  by  Humphreys.  Lond.  1714.  8.]  A)  Ao- 
oordinff  to  the  Fragments  in  Eu9eb.  H.  ece.  IV,  2d,  comp.  V,  24 ;  Ilieron.  cataL  c  24 ;  Piper,  Mo- 
litoi  (Stnd.  a.  Krit  188&  P.  1.)  i)  Utpl  rris  rw  XpttrriayAy  wlerrws,  t±  J.  C  Wolf,  Ilsmk 
17S4;  UeberiL  mit  Aam.  r.  Thtencmmiin.  Ipi.  1881     V)  Auunpfths  r&p  f^v  ^iXotri^v.  ed. 


52  ANCIENT  CHUBCn  HISTORY.    PER.  L    DIV.  IL    A.  D.  10(K-812. 

erally  discussed  in  his  day.  (0  TertuUian^  especially  in  his  Apologeticus,  not 
only  demonstrated  the  perfect  right  of  the  Church  to  civil  protection,  hut  in- 
veighed with  hitter  eloquence  against  the  vile  amouis  of  the  ancient  gods  in 
the  shape  of  fishes,  birds,  and  beasts.  Origen^  whose  philosophical  views 
were  fundamentally  similar  to  those  of  his  opponent,  with  an  untiring  indus- 
try met  all  the  objections  which  Celsus  had  urged,  and  while  doing  so,  pre- 
sented a  doctrinal  defence  of  Cliristianity,  with  very  little  ciire  or  success  in 
the  discussion  of  the  political  question.  These  works  of  Origen  and  Tertul- 
lian  indicate  that  their  authors  fully  believed  that  Christianity  had  already 
reached  a  point  which  rendered  its  future  progress  inevitable.  Arnohias  of 
Sicca  endeavored,  in  a  controversial  work  (about  808),  to  obtain  the  confi- 
dence of  the  Christians,  whom  he  had  before  persecuted ;  and  though  it  con- 
tained many  needless  speculations,  it  defended  also  the  more  profound  doc- 
trines of  the  Church,  and  exposed  the  errors  of  heathenism  with  much 
rhetorical  skill,  (w)  The  object  of  the  apologists  was :  1)  To  answer  the  ob- 
jections made  against  Christians.  They  met  the  charge  of  atheism  by  point- 
ing to  the  well-known  piety  of  Christians  and  showing  the  true  nature  of  a 
spiritual  worship.  To  the  imputation  of  unnatural  crimes  they  opposed  the 
strictness  of  their  morality,  and  in  refutation  of  the  charge  of  treason,  they 
appealed  to  the  submission  shown  by  Christians  in  time  of  persecution,  and 
to  the  prayers  which  they  offered  up  in  behalf  of  the  emperor.  Tlie  suffer- 
ings of  Christians  were  ascribed  to  demoniac  agency ;  the  death  of  the  mar- 
tyrs was  shown  to  be  no  real  evil ;  the  representation  of  a  Deity  enduring 
sufferings  but  glorified  even  in  death,  they  proved  was  not  unknown  even  in 
Grecian  mythology ;  public  calamities  were  attributed  to  the  divine  displeasure 
on  account  of  the  persecution  of  Christians ;  and  although  they  did  not  con- 
cede that  the  recent  introduction  of  a  religion  was  a  proper  argument  against 
its  truth,  they  traced  the  radical  principles  of  Christianity  back  to  a  time  be- 
fore Moses  and  Abraham — ^a  period  prior  to  the  existence  of  any  of  the  Gre- 
cian systems  of  philosophy.  2)  To  contend  against  the  Hellenistic  systems. 
By  appeals  to  facts  and  to  reason,  they  showed  the  utter  insufiSciency  and  the 
immorality  of  polytheism ;  tliey  objected  to  the  spiritual  explanations  given 
of  the  myths  as  uncandid ;  and  while  they  acknowledged  all  that  was  true 
and  consistent  with  the  gospel  in  philosophy,  they  proved  that  this  was  quite 
unsatisfactory  as  the  basis  of  a  national  religion.  8)  To  prove  the  truth  and 
divine  authority  of  Christianity.  Among  the  arguments  used  for  this  pur- 
pose, were,  the  moral  power  and  divine  wisdom  exhibited  even  by  poor  and 
uneducated  people,  the  religious  peace  conferred  by  Christianity,  its  perfect 
reasonableness  and  its  rapid  and  irresistible  progress,  the  triumph  with  which 
the  martyrs  met  their  fate,  and  the  historical  proofs  of  divine  assistance. 


Dommerich.  IlaL  1764.  t)  Ed.  Lindner.  Longosal  (1760)  1778;  Uebere.  m.  Anm.  v.  JRuMicurm, 
Hamb.  1824  4;  Neu  brsg.  erklart  u.  ubi-ra.  v.  Lubkert.  Lps.  1886 ;  Ad  fidem  cod.  Rt>gii  et  Brnx.  rec. 
JSJuard.  d«  MuraUo,  pracfatus  est  Orflti.  Tur.  1886.—//:  Meier,  Comm.  de  Mln.  FeL  Tur.  ISM.— 
Doubtful  whether  It  was  written  In  the  age  of  the  Antoninea,  or  after  Tertullian.  Probably  in  tbo 
former,  m)  Disputationes  adv.  gentos.  L  VII.  e<l  J.  C  Orelli^  Lps.  1816 ;  Additamentum.  Lps. 
1817 :  ox  nova  cod.  Paris  collat  roc.  G.  F.  Hildehrand^  Hal.  1844 ;  Uebers.  u.  eriiut  ▼.  J?.  A.  V, 
SMnard.  Landah.  1842.— P.  K.  Mayer^  de  ratione  et  ai^gumento  apologeUcl  ArnoblanL  Uavd.  ISlSi 


CHAP.  L    8TEUGGLE8  OP  CHKISTIANITY.    |  58.  BARBAROUS  NATIONS.       53 

Among  the  lost,  a  superior  place  was  gllren  to  fulfilled  prophecies,  bat  next 
to  them  stood  the  miracles  which  had  been  wrought  by  Jesus  and  his  fol- 
lowers in  the  different  periods  of  the  Church. 

§  58.     Religion  of  Barbarous  Nation», 

Roman  power  and  Greek  culture  had  either  broken  up,  renovated,  or 
adopted  into  the  Roman  Pantheon  the  religions  of  all  conquered  nations.  In 
the  East,  ever  since  the  time  of  the  Grecian  conquests,  nothing  remained  in 
^#if7,  with  the  exception  of  the  established  local  worship  of  some  fovorite 
gods,  but  a  sensuous  glow  of  devotion,  or  occasionally  in  Egypt  a  gloomy, 
pensive  and  mysterious  form.  In  Western  Europe,  the  religion  of  the  Celtic 
nations  was  evidently  declining.  In  Gaul^  the  Druuls^  as  priests,  judges, 
sages,  and  physicians,  had  monopolized  all  intellectual  pursuits,  and  estab- 
lished a  powerful  hierarchy.  In  contrast  with  them  existed  a  nobility,  whose 
sole  occupation  was  war.  To  these  two  classes  the  common  people  gradual- 
ly became  completely  enslaved.  But  when  the  common  people  sunk  into 
this  state  of  insignificance,  the  priesthood  lost  their  principal  support  in  op- 
position to  the  nobility,  and  it  was  on  account  of  the  discord  which  prevailed 
between  these  states,  that  the  Romans  were  invited  into  their  country. 
Cssar  came,  and  saw,  and  conquered.  The  national  religion  was  then  re- 
stricted within  certain  limits  by  the  Roman  law.  Augustus  required  that  no 
Roman  citizen  should  take  any  part  in  its  rites,  and  Claudius  finnlly  prohib- 
ited all  human  sacrifices.  It  was  not,  however,  so  much  by  the  direct  power 
of  their  conquerors  that  the  Druids  were  overthrown,  as  by  the  new  social 
relations  -then  introduced.  As  early  as  near  the  close  of  the  first  century, 
the  Order  of  the  Druids  was  an  independent  and  learned  association,  and  the 
old  popular  faith  was  mingled  with  the  Roman  mythology,  {a)  In  Britain^  the 
power  of  the  Druids,  which  was  continually  exerted  to  arouse  the  people  to 
renewed  efforts  for  freedom,  could  only  be  destroyed  by  violence  (G2).  Un- 
der the  conciliatory  administration  of  Agricola,  Roman  habits  and  arts  of 
life  acquired  ascendency  even  to  the  foot  of  the  Highlands,  (h)  Hence,  no 
province  of  the  empire  opposed  Christianity  with  any  remarkable  or  long- 
oontinued  energy,  and  the  West  presented  but  little  more  resistance  to  its 
progress  than  had  been  awakened  in  its  own  eastern  home. 

§  64.    Spread  of  Christ ianity, 

Near  the  middle  of  the  second  century,  the  gospel  had,  in  the  East, 
passed  beyond  the  limits  of  the  Roman  empire.  In  Edessa  especially  it 
gained  possession  of  the  throne,  and  a  few  churches  were  collected  in  Par- 
thia,  Persia,  and  India.  Proceeding  from  Rome,  it  obtained  an  established 
position  in  Carthage  and  in  the  western  provinces  of  Africa.    In  Western 

a)  Cae$ar,'  de  bello  gall  I,  81.  VI,  12-16.— •;:  G.  FHck,  de  DnildK  ed.  A.  FHck,  nm,  1744.  4; 
DucioK^  M6nL  8iir  lea  Drnidea  (Mem.  de  Tacad.  des  Insoript  Th.  XIX.) ;  Mone^  Gcsch.  d.  Heldcnth. 
1m  nurdl.  Eur.  Lps.  tt  Darmrt.  18229.  vol.  II.  p.  858-426.  h)  E,  Davie*,  Celtic  Researches  on  Um 
Origin  and  Traditions  of  the  Ancient  Britons.  Lend.  1804.  [Id^m.  Eites  of  the  BriHsh  Dmlda.  Ix>nd. ; 
G.  niggint.  The  Celtic  Dmids.  Lond.  1927.  4.]  Tdamf,  lHst  of  the  Druids,  with  wMlllons  by 
JTwddUtiUm,  Montrose,  1914;  Mone,  vol.  II.  p.  426-M8.  [Litt^^Wa  Rcl.  Mag.  vol.  II.  1829.  pp.  81-40. 
119-122.  400-606;  Inddants  of  the  ApoetoUo  Age  in  Britain.  Lond.  1841  IS.] 


54  ANCIENT  CHUBCH  HISTOBT.    PER.  L    DIY.  IL    A.  D.  100-M2. 

Europe  it  pressed  onward  to  Spain  ai|i  even  gained  some  possessions  in  Bri- 
tain. Flourishing  churches  from  Asia  Minor  were  planted  in  Lyons,  Vienne, 
and  Paris,  from  which  Christianity  was  extended  to  barbarous  nations  whose 
language  had  never  been  reduced  to  writing,  (^i)  Near  the  close  of  the  third 
century,  churches  were  established  in  Armenia,  and  a  few  bislioprics  were 
formed  on  the  Rhine  and  in  Britain.  The  manner  in  which  religion  was  pro- 
pagated was,  commencing  generally  with  the  large  cities,  it  was  carried  for- 
ward not  so  much  by  organized  missions  as  by  ordinary  social  intercourse. 
It  had  become  powerful  as  a  popular  element,  prevailing  most  among  the 
lower  classes,  but  by  means  of  slaves  and  women  it  had  penetrated,  as  early 
as  near  the  end  of  the  second  century,  every  order  of  society.  Abont  that 
time  the  Apologists  speak  of  the  number  of  Christians  with  skilful  and  en- 
thusiastic declamation ;  (//)  and  though  even  in  the  commencement  of  the 
fourth  century  they  were  far  from  being  a  majority  of  the  population,  their 
intimate  fellowship  and  zeal  gave  them  a  predominant  influence  in  society. 
The  barbarous  Jewish  origin  and  the  strict  and  self-denying  morality  of  the% 
religion,  the  suspicion  of  ])o]itical  disaffection  under  which  they  rested,  and 
their  simple,  lowly  character  at  first,  were  powerful  difficulties  in  the  way 
of  its  propagation.  But  to  be  weighed  against  these,  as  secondary  causes  of 
its  victory,  must  be  noticed  the  advantage  which  it  enjoyed  on  account  of 
the  unity  of  the  Eoman  empire  and  the  general  prevalence  of  Greek  cul- 
ture, its  miraculous  powers,  and  the  benefits  which  it  offered  to  the  poor,  the 
sick,  travellers,  and  those  who  were  in  any  way  destitute.  Even  the  perse- 
cutions through  which  it  passed  were  beneficial,  since  they  were  severe 
enough  to  arouse  in  its  followers  an  heroic  courage,  and  in  those  who  observed 
them  an  admiring  wonder,  and  yet  were  not  protracted  or  general  enough  to 
destroy  the  Church.  Next  to  the  vital  decline  of  heathenism,  however,  the 
essential  reason  of  its  success  was  the  real  truth  and  power  of  Christianity 
presenting  itself  in  the  happiest  of  all  forms — a  religion  adapted  to  the  masses 
of  the  people. 

§  55.     The  LaH  Perseeutian, 

ladanl  de  mortib.  e.  7-ia  Euseb.  H.  ecc  YIIL  IX. 

In  the  enjoyment  of  forty  years  of  peace  Christianity  had  time  to  per- 
fect its  victories.  It  was  then  that  Bioeletmn  (284-305)  by  his  protracted 
course  of  real  success,  was  induced  to  hope  he  might  restore  the  empire  to 
its  former  glory.  He  regarded  the  restoration  of  the  established  religion  to 
its  former  ascendency  as  a  primary  condition  on  which  such  a  result  de- 
pended. His  son-in-law  the  Caesar  Galeriun,  in  consequence  of  his  low  dis- 
positi6n  and  heathenish  superstition,  became  the  instrument  of  a  party  in  the 
court,  which  demanded  the  subversion  of  Christianity  as  indispensable  to  the 
stability  of  their  power.  The  heathen  government,  conscious  that  it  was 
sinking  in  its  proper  cliaracter  before  the  spiritual  power  of  the  Churoh,  com- 
menced another  struggle,  on  the  issue  of  which  was  staked  its  life  or  death. 
Galerius  first  removed  all  Christians  from  his  army  (298).    Diocletian  stiD 


a)  Irw,  III,  1    I)  Tertitl.  Apdogettcoflk  c  87.  e.  Jod.  &  T. 


CHAP.  L    8TBU00LES  OF  CHRISTIANITY.    |  58.  HABTTB&  65 

shrank  from  the  contest,  for  he  well  knew  it  would  be  terrible.  UnaUy, 
when  counsel  had  been  sought  fVom  gods  and  men,  the  destruction  of  the 
Church  of  Nicomedia  (Feb.  28,  303)  proclaimed  that  the  persecution  of  the 
Christians  had  commenced.  The  imperial  edict  which  immediately  followed 
that  event,  commanded  that  all  Christian  temples  should  be  destroyed,  and 
the  books  belonging  to  them  burned ;  that  all  civil  officers  professing  Chris- 
tianity should  forfeit  their  dignities ;  that  Christian  citizens  should  be  deprived 
of  their  civil  privileges,  and  that  even  slaves  who  avowed  faith  in  Christ 
should  lose  all  prospect  of  freedom,  (a)  The  indignation  such  a  proceeding 
provoked  against  the  emperor,  and  the  real  or  imaginary  perils  which  now 
threatened  him,  required  that  the  whole  power  of  the  empire  should  be  ar- 
rayed against  the  Christians.  After  two  other  edicts  had  been  put  forth,  each 
more  rigorous  than  that  which  preceded  it,  a  fourth  (804)  required  that  all 
Christians  should  be  compelled  to  offer  sacrifice  by  every  practicable  means,  (h) 
The  persecution  raged  in  nearly  every  part  of  the  empire.  The  spirit  of  the 
Church  was  divided  by  the  most  heroic  courage  and  base  cowardice.  Monu* 
ments  were  erected  in  honor  of  the  emperor,  implying  that  he  had  utterly 
abolished  the  name  of  Christian.  But  in  Gaul,  Spain,  and  Britain,  the  suf- 
ferings of  the  Christians  were  much  mitigated  by  the  conduct  of  the  Caesar 
C(nutantius  Chlortts.  His  son,  Constantine  (after  306),  inherited  his  father's 
spirit  in  a  still  higher  degree.  In  the  East,  Galerius,  tired  of  the  useless  effu- 
sion of  blood,  on  his  deathbed  (311)  suspended  the  progress  of  the  persecu- 
tion, (e)  but  it  was  immediately  renewed  in  Ana  by  Maximinus.  When  Con- 
stantine, however,  had  overthrown  Maxentius,  he,  in  conjunction  with  Lici- 
nius,  the  Augustus  of  Eastern  Europe,  was  induced  by  his  regard  for  Chris- 
tians to  proclaim  (312)  a  universal  toleration  for  all  religions,  (d) 

§  50.     T/if  M,trti/rs, 

There  are  commonly  reckoned  ten  |)ersecntion'-\  ;is  tlint  nnmber  is  conve- 
nient for  popular  recollection,  and  accordant  with  certain  allegorical  rela- 
tions, (a)  but  some  of  them  scarcely  deserve  the  name.  Those  who  were 
disposed  to  fly  from  the  danger  usually  found  the  way  of  escape  unobstructed ; 
when  any  actually  suffered  they  were  generally  those  whose  lives  were  re- 
garded as  of  no  value,  those  whose  death  appeared  needful,  on  account  of 
tiieir  superior  guilt,  as  a  warning  to  others,  and  those  who  occupied  promi- 
nent stations  in  the  Church,  or  slaves.  Accordingly,  even  in  the  time  of 
Origen,  the  number  of  those  who  liad  died  as  martyrs  was  very  small,  and 
easily  reckoned,  (h)  We  read  of  a  blind  fury,  in  the  times  of  Dec  ius  and  Dio- 
cletian, which  no  longer  regarded  individuals,  but  vented  itself  in  the  sacrifice 
of  whole  masses  of  people  at  once ;  but  in  general,  the  first  notices  we  have 
respecting  it  are  in  the  exaggerated  accounts  which  have  come  down  to  us  in 

a)  Lact  c.  IS.  Eu9tib.  Till,  2.    h)  BuMi>.  de  martyribos  Palaest  c.  8. 

«)  Laet  c  M.  Fuseb.  YIII,  17. 

d)  Its  contents  mnj  be  inferred  from  the  edict  of  818 :  LacL  e.  48.  Eoaeb.  X,  fi. 

a)  Apoc  17,  12m.  Exod.  7b0. 

b)  Qrig.  c.  Ce1&  IIL  (Th.  L  p.  452.)  Yet  eompi  Iren.  IV,  88,  i.^DodtcOl^  do  peaeltate  maitTram. 
In  hti  Vm.  Cjprianleia.    On  the  other  hand,  Ruinarti  PtmI  ad  Acta  martymm. 


56  ANCIENT  CIIUBCH  HISTORY.    PER.  L    DIY.  IL    A.  D.    100-812. 

legends.  Thas  we  find  that  eleven  thousand  virgins  are  said  to  have  perished 
with  St,  Ursula.  The  most  credible  evidence  on  which  tliis  story  was  built, 
consists  in  a  false  construction  of  an  ancient  manuscript,  and  a  revelation  from 
heaven  to  a  company  of  monks  first  in  the  year  11 G8,  which  ])ointed  out 
their  bones.  The  story  of  the  massacre  of  the  Theban  legion  (2G8)  appears 
in  a  fluctuating  state  even  in  the  sixth  century,  (c)  The  executions  generally 
took  place  in  strict  conformity  with  the  demands  of  the  penal  law,  but  when 
the  feelings  of  the  populace  were  especially  embittered,  or  when  it  seemed 
desirable  to  terrify  survivors,  the  most  dreadful  illegal  torments  were  de- 
vised, {d)  Many  saved  themselves  by  denying  Christ,  and  offering  sacrifice 
to  the  gods  (thurificati,  sacrificati),  some  by  bribing  the  magistrates  to  grant 
them  certificates  that  they  had  sacrificed  (libellatici),  and  others  by  surren- 
dering the  sacred  books  (traditores).  But  so  great  was  the  Joy  of  the  Conn 
/essora  and  the  Martyrs,  that  they  were  sometimes  reproved  by  judicious 
pastors  for  pressing  too  eagerly  forward  to  death.  The  virtues  of  Greek  and 
Roman  antiquity  were  revived,  as  the  people  surrendered  tliemselves  that 
they  might  obtain  a  home  beyond  the  skies,  (e)  The  power  of  faith  was 
triumphant  even  over  the  feelings  of  our  common  nature,  and  over  the  shud- 
dering horror  which  persons  of  a  delicate  habit  and  of  refinement  are  apt  to 
feel  on  such  occasions.  Even  children  took  pleasure  in  death,  and  noble 
maidens  endured  what  was  far  worse.  (/)  Although  many  encountered 
death  cheerfully,  because  they  preferred  it  to  the  disgrace  which  must  have 
been  the  lot  of  the  apostate  and  the  traitor,  and  because  they  longed  for  the 
honor  and  glory  which  the  martyrs  attained  even  on  earth  in  the  admiration 
of  their  friends  and  expected  immediately  after  in  Paradise,  there  was  be- 
yond all  this  a  genuine  delight  in  following  Jesus,  which  gave  to  the  Churdi 
a  consciousness  that  it  was  invincible. 


OHAP.  n.— fiOOIAL  CONSTITUTION  OF  THE  CHURCH. 

J.  n.  Bdhm«r^  Entwickl  d.  KStaats  d.  ereten  8  Jfthrh.  Ilal  (1716)  1733.  W.  K.  L  ZUgler^  Vm  e. 
pn^.  Qesch.  d.  kirchl  Oesellschaftaformen  In  d.  erston  6  Jalirh.  LpA.  1799.  Jfofder,  die  Einh.  in  d. 
K.  o.  d.  Princip.  d.  Kath.  1m  Oeisto  d.  KYerf.  d.  8  orsten  Jalirh.  T&b.  1S25.  //<ri«^,  de  Jure  ec» 
Coinintr.  hist  Lps.  1S3S.  V.L  J.  If.  M.  Ernetti,  KStaat  d  8  ereten  Jahrh.  XQrnb.  1S30.  W.  SuA- 
mer^  die  eoclalcn  Verb.  d.  K.  alter  Zeit  (Alterthumsw.  vol.  I.)  BresL  1336.  JT.  Rothe^  die  AnfSng* 
d.  K.  u.  Ihrer  Verf.  Witt  1837.  vol.  L  {RiddU»  Manual  of  Cliristlan  AntlquIUea,  Lond.  BinghanCs 
Origlnes  Ecdesiasticae,  Lond.  1S45.  L,  CoUman,  Primitive  Cbristianity  EzompUaed,  Pbilad.  1853. 
2toUl&] 

§  57.     Original  Documents  on  Ecclesiastical  Law. 

The  usages  and  laws  which  prevailed  in  particular  provinces  were  not  es- 
sentially different  from  each  other,  since  the  general  relations  of  society  were 


c)  Vita  RonumL  (Acta  Sanctor.  Feb.  Th.  III.  p.  T40.)  Trilh^mii  Ann.  Hire.  Th.  I.  p.  4.10.  G.  Ifa- 
ffmt  Reimcbmnik  d.  Stadt  Colin.  Edited  by  GrooU,  Coll  1834  Comp.  Rheinwald's  Rep.  ISSfi.  vol. 
IX.  p.  201s&— Z>M  Bourdiev^  i«ur  le  martTte  de  la  legion  th6b6enno.  Amst  1705.  12.  Jo».  d'UU^  d6- 
fense  de  la  verity  de  la  legion  tb6boenne.  Par.  1741.  12.— Seapeeting  Massa  Candida ;  in  Prudent 
Hymn.  18«.  aec  TUlftnont,  Tb.  IV.  p.  175ea. 

d)  Saffittariiu  de  mart  excruciatib.  Frofl  et  Lps.  (1678)  1CD6.  4    f)  Suteb.  H.  ecc.  V,  1. 
/)  Lad.  Inatt  V,  la 


CHAP.  IL    CONSTITUTION.    {  67.  LEGISLATION.    |  68.  CLEBGY.  67 

every  where  the  same,  and  a  continual  intercourse  was  carried  on  between 
the  several  parts  of  the  empire.  They  may  bo  learned  partly  from  the  wri- 
ting!) of  the  contemporaneous  fathers,  in  which  individual  facts  are  referred 
to,  and  partly  from  later  enactments,  which,  without  hesitation,  refer  to  primi- 
tive usage.  The  ApoBtolical  Constitutions  which  bear  the  name  of  Clemens 
Bomann^v,  in  the  first  six  books  contain  the  oldest  usages  and  laws  prevalent 
among  the  Jewish  Christians  of  the  Oriental  Church  of  the  third  century. 
In  the  fourth  century,  when  the  seventh  and  eighth  books  were  added,  this 
work  received  some  interpolations  with  respect  to  ecclesiastical  usages,  though 
not  in  the  sense  charged  by  the  Arians.  As  a  collection  they  have  never  at- 
tained any  legal  authority,  (a)  The  Apostolical  Canons  are  a  compilation 
gradnally  formed  of  the  constitutions  and  enactments  of  Synods  during  the 
fourth  oentnry,  and  therefore  are  supposed  to  embrace  the  traditions  respect- 
ing law,  which  had  come  down  from  the  Apostles.  The  Roman  Church  hav- 
ing once  rejected  this  collection  as  a  whole,  decided  (after  500)  to  receive  the 
first  fifty  canons,  (h)  John  Scholasticus  (middle  of  the  6th  century)  found  all 
the  eighty-five  canons  already  in  the  books  of  laws  used  in  the  Greek  Church,  (e) 
Xo  proof  therefore  in  favor  of  a  regular  system  of  legal  relations  in  the 
ehurches  of  the  second  and  third  centuries  can  be  drawn  merely  from  this 
collection,  because  it  bears  the  apostolic  name. 

§  58.     The  Clergy  and  the  Laity, 

The  ofiBces  of  the  Church  at  this  period  presented  very  little  to  excite  the 
cupidity  of  ordinary  men,  and  even  the  honor  attending  them  was  counter- 
balanced by  the  dangers.  And  yet  it  seemed  desirable  to  increase  the  venera- 
tion which  necessarily  attends  the  virtues  and  a  faithful  performance  of  offi- 
cial duty  in  the  Church,  by  mysterious  forms  of  ordination,  by  connecting 
tbem  through  various  associations  with  the  Old  Testament  priesthood,  and 
by  external  tokens  of  peculiar  sanctity.  The  result  was,  that  even  in  the 
•eoond  century  the  priests  (icXJjpor,  ordo)  were  represented  as  the  official  me- 
diators between  Christ  and  the  congregation  (}.a6s^  plebs).  To  speak  in  the 
church,  and  to  administer  holy  rites,  were  conceded  to  be  the  special  prero- 
gatives of  the  clergy,  although  learned  laymen  were  sometimes  heard  in  the 
pablic  assembly,  with  the  consent  of  tlie  bishop,  {a)  In  all  things  relatmg 
to  the  business  of  the  congregation,  the  principal  care  and  authority  devolved 
opon  the  clergy,  But  this  power  was  generally  exercised  mildly  and  with  a 
true  regard  for  the  pablic  good,  since  those  who  possessed  it  could  use  no  ex- 
ternal means  of  coercion,  and  the  clergy,  being  generally  without  fixed  sala- 

<0  Aiarcryal  rmv  ay.  *Air(Hrr6\vy,  prlnUnl  in  Cotelerias' Edit  of  the  Patres  Ai>p.  Th.  I.  p.  199, 
[/Wtetn  htf  pobL  A  D«w  edit  of  th«  Ap.  Conttt  Lpi^  1S54. 12.]->0.  Krabbe,  Q.  Ur$iprung  u.  Inhalt 
itr  qinat  Conitltt  Hamb.  1S29.  J.  S.  v.  Drey^  neue  Untem.  Q.  d.  ConsUtt  u.  Kanones  der  App. 
T6kisai. 

^)  GHoHi^  D«er»tain  i.  491  {OrtUtan  :  c.  &  D.  XV.  1 04.)  DionyHi  Praeftitloi  {Man^i.  Th.  L  p.  &) 

^)  Kor^ff  4icK\ii^iaiirriKo\  rity  ay.  *ATo<rr6\wy,  printed  in  most  of  the  ecdee.  collections  of  laws 
nd  la  CotfUHus,  I.  p.  487.— Jf  R  RegmhrecKt,  de  canonib.  App.  Yrat  1828.  Krabhe  de  cod. 
•BQonm,  qai  App.  nomine  drcamferantar.  Qott  1820.  4. 

a)  EH»gh,  If.  •oe.  YI,  19.  Con^  app.  Till,  82.  oomp.  Cone.  Oitih.  IV.  a.  419.  can.  98.  {MantU 
Tk  IIL  p^  999.)    iO&ne,  CartK  an.  89&  can.  82.  In  Landon'a  Manual  of  ConndlA.] 


68  ANCIENT  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  L    DIV.  IL    A.  D.  IW-ZVL 

lies,  were  dependent  upon  the  voluntary  contribntions  of  the  people.  (5) 
Their  autliortty  was  often  mnch  straitened  by  the  inflaence  of  the  oonfessora, 
and  the  idea  wns  not  yet  romoved  of  a  priesthood  embracing  all  tme  Chris- 
tians, (e)  The  congregation  still  possessed  the  undisputed,  though  often  the 
violated  right,  to  decide  upon  the  exclusion  and  the  restoration  of  its  own 
members,  to  confirm  the  choice  of  its  presbyters,  to  be  heard  upon  every  im- 
portant matter,  and  to  elect  its  own  bishop.  This  last  mentioned  public  pri- 
vilege, near  the  close  of  the  third  century,  was  much  curtailed  by  the  inter- 
ference of  the  clergy  who  presided  over  the  congregation,  and  of  the  neigh- 
boring bishops,  ((t)  As  many  presbyters  were  elected  as  appeared  necessary 
at  the  time,  until  in  each  congregation  such  a  number  was  gradually  settled 
upon  as  its  circumstances  seemed  to  require.  In  Ae  African  churches  the 
Elders  (seniores)  do  not  seem  to  have  been  devoted  to  the  business  of  in- 
struction, nor  to  have  belonged  to  the  clerical  order.  Their  office  did  not 
then  imply  a  clearly  recognized  distinction  between  lay  and  clerical  presby- 
ters, and  they  were  probably  relics  of  the  original  equality  of  the  clergy  and 
all  (rod^s  people  in  the  primitive  Church,  when  all  the  presbyters  were  not 
fitted  for  the  work  of  instruction  and  private  members  of  the  Church  were 
not  excluded  from  it.  (e)  Beacons  were  not  regarded  as  belonging  to  the 
proper  priesthood  (sacerdotium),  but  as  ecclesiastical  servants  (ministree).  As 
the  number  seven  originally  connected  with  the  deacon^s  office  was  not  will- 
ingly exceeded,  the  larger  churches  in  the  third  century  were  supplied  with 
sub-deacons.  To  the  appropriate  duties  of  the  deacon's  office  were  added  li- 
turgical exercises,  and  sometimes  also  preaching.  As  they  were  elected  by 
the  bishop  alone,  they  were  sometimes  through  his  influence  exalted  above 
the  presbyters.  The  inferior  services  pertaining  to  the  Church  were  per- 
formed by  laymen,  from  whom  were  gradually  formed  four  gradations  of  a 
semi-clergy,  called  Ostiarii,  Lectores,  Exorcistae,  and  AcoluthL  The  clergy 
became  more  and  more  separated  from  all  secular  employments,  but  as  they 
were  generally  obliged  to  pass  through  the  inferior  offices,  they  obtained  a 
practical  education,  and  many  of  them  in  the  catechetical  schools  of  the 
Church  or  in  the  philosophical  schools  of  the  heathen,  acquired  considerable 
learning.  The  rule  that  no  one  should  be  advanced  to  the  higher  stations  in 
the  Church  until  he  had  performed  for  a  certain  period  the  functions  of  each 
inferior  office,  was  frequently  dispensed  with  by  the  favor  of  the  bishop  or 
of  the  people,  and  laymen  and  even  catechumens  were  sometimes  inmie- 
diately  elevated  to  the  episcopal  office. 


h)  ZiegUr,  die  Eink&nfte  des  Cleriu  in  d.  enten  8  Jabrh.  (Henke's  N.  Mag.  toL  IV.  p,  lias.) 

c)  Tren.  IV,  20.  Tertuk  de  bapt  c  17.  Exhort  ad  caat  o.  7.  Oriff.  in  Jo.  torn.  1,  &  (Tb.  IV.  p.  &) 
de  orat  c.  2a 

d)  Cypr.  Ep.  81.  J  fl.  Ep.  69.  {  L— iFuw6.  H.  ecc  VI,  4S.~-Cypr.  Ep.  6.  $  6.—Cypr.  Ep.  6&  (  & 
Ep.68.  (6. 

e)  Catcini  Inst.  IV,  8,  S.  Corrected  bj  TitHnga^  de  syn.  yet  II,  2. 


CHAP.  IL    CONSTITUTION.    {  59.  BISHOPS.  59 

§  59.    Bishops. 

Wahnis  Uf—aUni  (Sitlnuuif)  Da.  d«  Eplsoopb  et  Presbb.  c  Petavum.  L.  B.  1641.  2>.  Blondd^ 
ApoL  pro  sententU  Uier.  de  Episc  et  Prr.  AmBt  1616.  4^  On  the  other  side:  H.  nanvmotid^  Das.  4. 
quibua  Eptacopetaa  Jura  ex  Sc  S.  et  antlquitate  adstruuntar.  Lond.  1651.  4.—LiU'te^  Ece.  app.  p. 
106RK.— A^M,  (L  d.  Urspr.  d.  btoch.  Oewalt  (Ill^n'a  Zeitachr.  1S82.  vol.  IL  aect  2.)—Rothe  die  Anfl  d. 
ehr.  Klrcbe.  p.  171m.  On  tbe  other  aide:  Baur  0.  d.  Urspr.  des  Eplaoopata.  (T&b.  Zeltschr.  1S83.  P. 
8.)  Comp.  S  42.  note  c.  [Jamiesottf  Cyprianna  laotinioa.  Lond.  1705.] 

In  the  Epistles  which  bear  the  name  of  Ignatius^  the  episcopate  is  repre- 
sented OS  the  divinely  appointed  pillar  which  sustains  the  whole  ecclesiastical 
fabric,  and  yet  much  needing  the  writer^s  most  earnest  commendations.  So 
general  and  so  thorongh  a  change  as  that  which  in  any  view  of  the  case  it 
must  have  passed  through  after  the  middle  of  the  second  century,  could  then 
have  been  effected  by  Ifo  personal  influence,  nor  by  general  consent,  but  only 
by  the  concurrent  power  of  circumstance.*?.  Wherever  there  was  more 
th.an  one  presbyter,  some  individual  on  account  of  his  personal  influence 
would  be  called  to  preside,  or  all  would  do  so  in  rotation.  When  diflferent 
portions  of  the  larger  congregations  met,  as  they  sometimes  did,  in  different 
places  of  worship  at  the  same  time,  each  congregation  would  naturally  be 
anxious  to  preserve  as  much  as  possible  its  existing  unity,  in  spite  of  its  acci- 
dental separation.  This  was  accomplished  by  retaining  a  common  oonnec- 
tion  with  the  presbyter  who  had  previously  presided  over  them.  But  by 
this  means  his  jurisdiction  became  much  enlarged  and  strengthened.  The 
name  Overseer  was  especially  applied  to  the  peculiar  office  which  such  a 
presbyter  filled,  (a)  As  soon  as  this  name  became  thus  appropriated  to  de- 
signate a  superior  dignity  in  the  larger  cities,  those  presbyters  who  stood 
alone  in  the  smaller  towns  would  naturally  prefer  the  original  Greek  appella- 
tion which  was  common  to  them  all.  Hence  Irenaens  continued  to  use 
both  names  interchangeably,  and  this  memento  of  the  original  equality  of 
presbyters  and  bishops  remained  firmly  in  the  Church  for  a  long  time  after 
new  relations  entirely  inconsistent  with  it  had  become  established,  (b)  At 
the  same  time  also  those  Elders  of  the  former  age  who  had  been  distingaished 
for  their  personal  character  were  always  spoken  of  under  the  name  of  Bish- 
ops. The  complete  realization  of  the  Episcopate  may  be  seen  in  the  Epistles 
of  Cyprian.  The  Bishop,  as  the  successor  of  the  apostles,  there  appears  as 
the  representative  of  his  Church,  and  at  the  same  time  to  the  Church  itself 
he  is  the  vicar  of  Christ;  he  is  espoused  to  the  local  congregation,  and  also 
to  the  general  Church ;  he  is  responsible  to  God  alone,  and  yet  is  an  indi- 
vidual organ  of  the  whole  episcopate,  (e)  He  possessed  supreme  power  in 
the  Church,  and  yet  in  important  matters  was  to  do  nothing  without  the 
counsel  of  his  presbyters,  {d)    All  ordinations  proceeded  from  him.    At  first 

a)  In  Jnatin  (ApoL  L  o.  66l)  atUl  called  irofMirrAr. 

5)  JTienm.  ad  Tit  I,  7.  Ep.  lol.  (al.  66.)  ad  Eyaogelam.  AmbroHaifst.  (ffUariut  Diae.)  ad  Eph. 
IT,  II.  ad  L  Tim.  Ill,  10.  CAryatL  Horn,  in  PblL  1, 1.  (Tb.  XL  p.  195.)  Both  paasagea  of  Jerome 
In  Oratian :  c.  6.  D.  XCV.  and  24.  D.  XCIIL  [alao  in  OUaeUr  Ecc.  Ilbt  toI  L  p.  106.  note  2.]  Bat 
Urban  IL  in  (Jane.  BmuterU.  can.  1.  {MantL  Th.  XX  p.  TSS.)  can  be  appealed  to  on  tbla  aabjcct 
ctHj  when  the  context  la  dlaregarded. 

c)  Cypr.  OraUo  ad  Cone.  Garth,  (p.  448.)  Ep.  72.  {  a  ad  Btepban.  Epi  67.  $  &  De  nnitato  Ecc  c  4. 

(f)  Citpr.  de  aleator  c.  1.  Ep.  69.  S  7.  Ep.  &  $  5.  Ep.  23. 1 2.  comp.  Chne.  Carthtig.  IV.  a.  419.  can. 
U,9&.    (JTanei,  Th.  IIL  p.  951) 


60       '        ANCIENT  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  I.    DIV.  IL    A.  D.  100-«1«. 

he  was  himself  ordained  hy  the  imposition  of  the  hands  of  the  presbyters, 
but  afterwards  by  the  neighboring  bishops.  Every  translation  of  a  bishop 
appeared  of  doubtful  propriety,  although  it  was  often  necessarily  conceded  to 
the  demands  of  ambition  and  of  higher  powers,  as  well  as  to  the  common 
welfare.  Many  of  the  bishops  of  the  country  congregations  (xo>p(ni<rKonoi) 
continued  from  the  very  commencement  of  their  existence  dependent  upon 
those  bishoprics  in  the  city  from  which  they  sprung,  and  others  originally 
independent  gradually  submitted  to  the  influence  of  the  neighboring  city 
bishop.  In  Africa  alone  no  distinction  between  the  names  ever  appears.  The 
bishops  of  the  larger  cities  in  like  manner  became  exalted  in  power  and  au- 
thority above  the  others.  But  all  bishops  possessed  the  right  of  perfect 
equality  among  themselves  since  their  prerogatives  depended  not  upon  the 
transitory  possessions  of  this  world,  but  upon  the  common  investiture  which 
they  had  all  received  from  Christ. 

§  60.    Synods. 

ZiegUr^  pragm.  Dant  dee  Urepmngs  d.  Synoden  a.  d.  Anabildung  d.  STnodalveiC  (Henke^e  N. 
Mag.  vul.  L  p.  125e8. 

Ever  since  the  latter  part  of  the  second  century  a  number  of  assemblies, 
composed  of  bishops  residing  near  each  other,  had  been  held  to  obtain  the 
highest  possible  authority  for  a  decision  of  the  controversies  which  had 
sprung  up.  (a)  But  in  the  commencement  of  the  third  century  the  provin- 
cial synods,  at  first  in  Greece,  (6)  and  soon  afterwards  in  the  whole  Eastern 
world,  became  the  formal  basis  of  an  ecclesiastical  constitution,  as  the  su- 
preme courts  of  legislation,  administration  and  jurisdiction.  Tlieir  meetings 
were  held  either  annually  or  semi-annually,  and  every  bishop  in  the  province 
had  a  seat  and  a  voice  in  them,  and  as  exceptions  to  the  rule,  even  presbyters 
and  confessors.  The  bishops  were  heard  not  as  ropresentativea  of  their 
churches  but  in  their  own  name,  in  consequence  of  a  right  received  from  the 
Holy  Ghost,  (c)  The  meetings  however  were  public,  and  the  people  who 
were  present  made  their  infiuence  felt.  The  possession  of  infallibility  was 
never  thought  of,  and  their  decisions  had  no  authority  beyond  their  respec- 
tive provinces,  {d)  The  ecclesiastical  provinces  which  in  this  way  appear  as 
communities,  to  which  all  individual  bishops  were  amenable,  generally  cor- 
responded with  the  provinces  of  the  empire. 

§  61.    Metropolitans, 

The  natural  presidents  of  the  ecclesiastical  provinces  were  the  bishops 
of  the  principal  cities  (/xi^rpoTrdXcir).  The  grounds  on  which  their  pre-emi- 
nence was  founded  were  generally  the  apostolical  origin  of  their  churches, 
the  wealth  of  their  congregations,  and  their  frequent  opportunities  of  a&tist- 
ing  those  who  resided  in  the  provinces.  The  Metropolitans  therefore,  as  the 
first  among  their  equals,  soon  obtained  the  right  of  convening  and  conduct- 

a)  EuMb.  H.  ©cc.  V.  16.  2a    ^)  Tertul  de  J^an.  c  18. 

c)  Cypr.  Ep.  M.  §  ft.  Coinp  Cane,  Arelat.  a.  814.  (JTaful,  Th.  II.  p.  489.) 

d)  (VP'-.Sp-l^f  2.Ep-&i|fi.Ep.79.|a 


CHAP.  IL    CONSTITUTION.    {  61.  METROPOLITANS.    {  62.  GREAT  BISHOPS.   6 1 

ing  the  proceedings  of  the  Synods,  and  of  confirming  and  ordaining  the  pro- 
vincial bishops.  Bat  it  was  only  in  the  East  that  this  Metropolitan  system 
was  completely  carried  oat.  The  Bishop  of  Carthage  sometimes  claimed  the 
right  of  a  Metropolitan  over  the  chnrches  in  Mauritania  and  Numidia,  where 
there  was  no  great  city  naturally  possessing  the  right  of  precedence,  but  the 
presidency  in  their  synods  was  always  given  to  the  oldest  bishop  (Senex). 

§  62.     The  Three  Great  Bishops. 

The  same  causes  which  produced  the  elevation  of  the  metropolitans,  op* 
erated  in  a  still  higher  degree  to  give  the  largest  metropolitan  diocese  to  the 
bishops  of  the  three  principal  cities  of  the  empire,  liome^  Alexandria^  and 
Antioeh,  Rome  obtafled  Middle  and  Lower  Italy  with  uncertain  limits, 
and  by  means  of  a  colony  of  bishops  sent  into  Southern  Gaul  (about  250)  an 
indefinite  influence  was  secured  in  the  affairs  of  that  region,  (a)  Alexandria 
obtained  possession  of  Egypt,  and  Antioch  of  Syria.  The  successor  of  St. 
Peter  received  an  honorable  rank  above  all  other  bishops,  on  account  of  the 
majesty  of  the  eternal  city,  and  the  vast  and  skilfully  used  wealth  at  his  dis- 
posal even  when  Laurentius  could  present  to  the  avaricious  magistrate  the 
poor  of  the  city  as  the  treasure  of  the  Roman  Church,  {b)  Roman  bishops 
of  that  period  have  since  been  canonized,  who  were  great  only  in  their 
deaths.  No  extraordinary  individuals  were  concerned  in  laying  the  founda- 
tions of  her  subsequent  empire.  The  first  presage  of  its  future  position  was 
ifibrded  in  two  attempts  which  it  made  to  impose  its  usages  upon  other 
churches.  These  were  sternly  repelled  by  the  Asiatic  and  African  bishops,  (c) 
The  thought  of  a  Bishop  of  bishops  was  first  advanced  in  favor  of  James, 
about  the  middle  of  the  second  century,  by  a  Jewish  party  in  Rome,  and  was 
regarded  in  Africa  as  equivalent  to  an  ecclesiastical  tyranny,  {d)  The  first 
voluntary  recognition  of  Roman  authority  in  matters  of  faith,  was  occa- 
sioned by  the  report  that  the  apostolical  traditions  had  been  preserved  with 
especial  purity  in  the  West,  {e)  Cyprian  saw  in  the  pre-eminence  of  Peter  a 
symbol  of  the  unity  of  the  Church.  (/)  Even  when  Marcellinus  ofiered  in- 
cen£e  to  the  gods  (302),  the  very  infirmity  of  a  Roman  bishop  has  been  made 

a)  Cypr.  Ep.  67.  comp.  Gregor.  Turon*  IL  Francor.  I,  2S. 

h)  The  prooft  are  collected  by  TilUmont  Th.  IV.  p.  41.      c)  |  69.  84 

d)  Epi  CUftutMs  id  Jac  in  ClenL  Hornil.  (P.  app.  e<1.  Goteler.  Th.  I.  p.  605).  Cypr.  In  Cone  Car- 
titto^  {RvutK,  Beliq.  Bac  III.  pw  91)  oonfl  Tcrtul.  de  padic  c.  1. 

«>  Iren.  Ill,  8,  2 :  **  A<1  banc  Ecclesiam  propter  potiorem  (potcntlorero)  prlnclpalitatcm  nccesM 
tf\  omnem  convenfre  Ecclesiam,  boc  est  eos  qal  sunt  nndique  fldelcs,  in  qua  semper  ab  hi%  qui  sunt 
oadlqiie,  coDaervata  est  ea  qnae  est  ab  Apostolis  traditio.  (Uphs  raxnj)v  iKK\riaiav  iih.  r^y 
\miB9mripa»  opx^''  hyirfia\  iruo-oy  ffvfifiaiudv  r^v  iKKKtiiriaVy  rovr*  iari  robs  vayrax^^fv 
vicrwSf  iv  ^  a«l  w»k  twv  iratrrax^^^y  ffvm'tr'fjprjrcu  17  airh  ruv  *A.iroar6\<i>tf  Tapd^oais.) 
C<ymp  TertuL  de  praescr.  c.  86.  208.— (7 W«a&acA,  de  potentloro  Eccl.  Rom.  principalitate.  Jen.  1778. 
(0pp.  ed.  GaUer^  Th.  II.  p  186fia.).  Paulus  in  the  Sophronizon.  1819.  P.  8.  On  the  other  side :  AVf- 
ietiamp^  CL  d.  Prlmat  Manst  1820.  p.  SOss.  Jioakavany,  de  primata  R.  Pontif.  Aug.  Y.  1534.  p. 
Vim.—'Jkier§ch,  in  d.  Stud.  a.  Krit  1S42.  P.  2.  oomp.  Keander^  [Church  Hist  vol.  I.  pp.  20.'j-205.] 

/)  De  unit  Ecc.  c  8.  Here,  even  in  Uie  genuine  text,  and  often  in  the  epistles  (52.  55),  he  ac- 
biotrledges  "Eome  aa  the  eocUtia  principcUU,  without,  however,  conceding  to  it  a  supremacy  in- 
couistent  with  the  parity  of  all  bishops  (Ep.  71).  Antirom.  interpretation  of  Matt  16,  IS.  in  Orig. 
ti  ML  torn.  18. 1 10a.  14 


62       •        ANCIENT  CnrUCH  HISTORY.    PEE.  L    DIV.  IL    A.  D.  100-Sli 

to  wear  such  an  aspect  in  popular  reports,  as  to  promote  the  glory  of  the  Ro- 
man see.  (<g) 

§  63.     The  Catholic  Chvrch  and  its  Variotu  Branches. 

The  internal  and  essential  nnity  of  the  Church  as  the  kingdom  of  God  on 
earth,  suggested  tlie  idea  of  an  external  unity  also.  The  effort  to  attain  this 
was  much  favored  by  the  political  unity  of  the  whole  civilized  world.  The 
religious  consciousness  which  prevailed  in  the  Christian  Church  with  more  or 
less  distinctness,  when  assailed  by  theological  or  moral  elements  inconsistent 
with  itself,  was  accustomed  to  appeal  to  the  apostolical  traditions  which  re- 
mained in  the  churches  founded  by  the  apostles.  From  this  sprung  up  the 
Great  or  Catholic  Churchy  (a)  in  distinction  from  th*  heretics  who  defended 
these  foreign  elements,  and  who  were  disunited  among  themselves.  By  the 
former  term  was  meant  the  great  body  in  which  all  the  congregations  found* 
ed  by  the  apostles,  and  such  as  were  connected  with  them,  had  hitherto  felt 
conscious  of  a  unity  through  faith  and  love,  and  which  was  the  only  source 
of  true  Christianity,  of  grace,  and  of  salvation.  The  first  hint  of  this  repre- 
sentation was  given  by  Ignatius,  but  it  was  further  developed  by  Irenaena, 
and  was  completed  by  Cyprian,  {h)  This  unity  was  realized  in  many  transao- 
tions  in  which  the  bishops  and  churches  held  intercourse  with  each  other. 
But  without  detracting  from  it,  a  Church  of  the  Fast  and  a  Church  of 
the  West  began  to  be  distinguished  from  each  other  with  respect  to  lan- 
guage, customs,  and  theological  tendencies.  Peculiar  usages,  in  fact,  some- 
times became  permanent  even  in  different  parts  of  the  same  metropolitan 
diocese,  especially  in  those  ecclesiastical  provinces  whose  boundaries  corre- 
spond with  old  national  limits.  Accordingly,  in  addition  to  the  dioceses 
of  the  three  great  bishops,  the  first  outlines  of  national  churches  were  formed 
in  correspondence  with  local  attachments  and  interests.  Thus  the  African 
Churchy  connected  with  Rome  by  feelings  of  fVee  mutual  sympathy,  and  ex- 
hibiting its  peculiar  spirit  in  the  writings  of  Tertullian,  sprung  up,  and  com- 
pleted an  appropriate  code  of  laws  after  the  middle  of  the  third  century,  in 
the  provincial  synods  of  Carthage,  (r)  Thus,  also,  the  Armenian  Church  was 
originated,  on  which  Gregory  (he  Enlightcner^  who  by  his  family  connec- 
tions had  been  deeply  involved  in  the  political  disorders  of  his  country,  and 
when  Christianity  triumphed  had  been  brought  out  of  a  long  night  of  im- 
prisonment to  be  made  a  metropolitan  (302),  so  deeply  imprinted  his  own 
spirit,  that  for  a  long  time  the  superior  bishop  or  Catholicus  was  selected 
from  his  family.  (</) 


0)  /larduin.  Acta  Concill.  vol  I.  p.  217m.    Baron^  ad  a.  802.  N.  SSssl 

o)  The  former  term  may  be  found  in  Celsus  {Orig.  c  Cels.  Y.  59)  and  ConstUt  app.  11.  25,  and 
the  latter  occurs  In  IgnaL  ad  Smym.  c.  8.  and  in  the  Epistle-  to  the  Church  of  Smyrna  respecting  the 
death  of  Polycarp,  in  Euaeb.  II.  ecc.  IV,  15. 

^)  ('UP''-  ^^  unltate  Ecc.  especially  c  4,  5,  21.  Ep.  47.  {  2. 

r)  SchflMratffi^  Ecc  afHc  sub  primatn  Carthag.  Par.  1679.  4  M.  Leydicker^  Hist  Eccl  alHc, 
Utn\J.  1694.  4.    MorceUl  Afrtca  christ  Brix.  1816.  8  Th.   MSnter,  Prlmordia  Ecc.  afric.  Uafii.  1S29.  4. 

(T)  AgatkangeU  (revised),  Acte  8.  Qregor.  (Acta  Sanctor.  8ept  Th.  YIII.  p.  821iss.)  Motts 
Choronennin  (about  440),  Hist  Armen.  I.  IIL  ed.  WhUtton.  Lond.  1786.  4.  Mai.  Samueljan^  Be- 
kehr.  Armcn.  durch  den  h.  Greg.  Ill  Wien.  \^m.— Saint  Martin^  Mt^motres  snr  TArmdnie.  Par. 
ISia  2  Th.  CAamic'A,  Ulstory  of  Armenia,  tiansL  by  AndalL  Calcutta.  1827.  8  Th. 


CHAP.  UL    EGCLES.  LIFR    S  U.  CHBISTIAN  MORALS.  •       63 


CHAP,  in.— ECCLESIASnOAL  LIFE. 

§  64.     Christian  Morals. 

Those  gifts  which  the  Spirit  of  God  had  bestowed  as  first-fruits  in  the 
early  periods  of  the  Church,  had  now  been  expended,  although  Irenaens  tes- 
tifies that  the  power  of  prophesying,  of  speaking  with  tongues,  of  healing 
diseases,  and  even  of  raising  the  dead,  remained  in  his  time.  Neither  of 
these,  however,  were  common,  except  that  method  of  healing  the  sick  which 
consisted  in  the  expulsion  of  demons,  (a)  Abstinence  from  blood  and  from 
things  strangled  may  have  been  occasioned  by  the  decree  of  the  apostles,  as 
it  obtained  prevalence  with  the  writings  of  Luke,  (b)  The  private  life  of 
Christians  was  regulated  by  principles  directly  opposed  not  only  to  the  sen- 
SQons,  but  to  the  intellectual  pleasures  of  heathenism,  (c)  In  their  estimation, 
the  earth  was  a  vale  of  tears,  and  the  predominant  feeling  of  the  noblest 
nunds  was  an  ardent  longing  for  their  home  in  another  world.  Joy  in  death 
and  love  toward  his  brethren  continued  still  to  be  the  distinguishing  badge 
of  a  follower  of  Christ,  (d)  This  spirit  became  peculiarly  powerful  in  times 
of  persecntion,  but  in  the  longer  periods  of  tranquillity,  envy  and  strife,  oov- 
etoosness  and  love  of  pleasure  gained  the  ascendency.  The  more  earnest  of 
the  public  teachers,  therefore,  regarded  the  persecutions  in  the  reigns  of  De- 
diiB  and  Diocletian  as  divine  judgments  to  arouse  a  slumbering  Church,  (e) 
A  pions  abandonment  even  of  the  innocent  enjoyments  of  the  world 
(iiaicrffris)  became  a  prevalent  characteristic  of  the  times,  but  among  some 
individoals  in  the  Church  it  was  regarded  as  the  ultimate  object  of  all  gene- 
ral effort.  Although  marriage  had  been  exalted  by  Christianity  to  its  true 
q;>iritual  meaning,  (/)  vows  of  perpetual  chastity  were  looked  upon  as  mer- 
itorious, (g)  and  many  virgins  (o-vveiVaicroi,  sorores)  undertook  the  often  un- 
fortunate, and  therefore  gradually  discountenanced  task,  of  exhibiting  the 
IK>wer  of  a  holy  will  as  brides  of  the  Lord  in  most  intimate  companionship 
with  the  clergy,  {h)  These  vows  were  not  absolutely  irrevocable,  but  the  re- 
cantation of  them  was  threatened  with  the  severest  penances.  An  entrance 
into  the  marriage  state  after  consecration  as  a  Deacon,  was  regarded  as  of 
doubtful  propriety,  and  was  limited  by  special  restrictions.  (0  In  the  ex- 
treme West,  one  Synod  had  already  forbidden  the  clergy  to  enter  the  mar- 
riage state,  and  even  the  lower  clergy  were  prohibited  all  connubial  inter- 
course during  seasons  of  public  duty.  (X)    On  the  other  hand,  all  attempts  to 

a)  Trem,  IT,  57.  Y,  6.  {Eu*eb.  H.  eoc  V,  7.)  Tertul  ad  ScapaL  c  8.  Apolog.  a  28.  OHg.  c  CeK 
I,  T.  VII,  4  (Th.  I.  p.  M5. 16ML) 

h)  TtrM.  Apok^  e.  9.    Only  tbo  Greek  Church  however  has  actually  adhered  to  it 

e)  EL  O.  Tertul.  de  Bpectacniia,  c.  28.  de  cultn  femm.  II.  ^.—Hefelet  iL  d.  Kigorism  d.  alten  Chris- 
tro  (Tfih.  Qnartalflchr.  1S41.  P.  8.) 

d)  Minuc  FeL  c  8.  Euseb.  H.  mc  YII,  22. 

4)  Oypr.  de  Inpa.  (Oppi  AmsteL  700.  p.  68.)  Eiueb.  H.  eco.  YIII,  1. 

/)  TtUiL  ad  uxor.  II,  %.  comp.  OHo.  In  Num.  hooL  6  (Th.  II.  pw  289.) 

g)  For  heathen  testimony,  Galen  In  Abul/eda,  U\st  Anteislam.  ed.  FlMsoher.  p.  109. 

h)  The  first  trace  oocnzs  as  early  as  In  Hermas  Tastor  IIL  Bim.  ft,  11.— Cf^pr.  £p.  83.  (kmc 
Afiteyr.  e.  19.    Nic  c  Z. 

<)  Cbnatltt.  app.  YL  17.    <7onc  Ancyr.  c.  la    UTtoeaet.  c.  1. 

k)  Cone,  IlUb^rU.  (805-809.)  c  8&  comp.  c.  65. 


64  ANCIENT  CUUECH  HISTORY.    PEE.  L    DIV.  II.    A.  D.  10(V-81i 

impose  a  rigid  system  of  asceticism  as  a  matter  of  universal  obligation,  were 
discountenanced  by  the  Church.  In  consequence  of  this,  the  Church  frequent- 
ly came  into  collision  with  the  various  classes  of  Encratites^  some  of  whom 
rejected  the  use  of  wine  even  in  the  Lord's  Supper  {IbponapaoTarai,  aquarii.) 

§  65.     St.  Anthony, 

Athana*iiu,  Vita  S.  Antonii.  (Th.  II.  p.  45<)fi8.)  Scmom.  H.  eoc.  I.  la  Jlieron.  caUL  c  SS.  Oth- 
er things:  Tillemonl,  Th.  TIL  p.  lOlaa.  [//.  Ri^ner^  The  Fathers  of  the  Desert.  New  York. 
1850.  2  vote.  12.] 

The  more  rigid  ascetics  in  Egypt  lived  as  hermits,  although,  during  the 
third  century,  most  of  them  continued  near  their  own  homes.  Ellas  and 
John  were  their  predecessors,  and  the  Therapeutae  their  countrymen.  A 
complete  withdrawal  from  the  world  seemed  the  necessary  consequence  of 
the  rupture  between  Christianity  and  the  world.  This  philosophical  mode  of 
life  received  its  permanent  form  through  the  influence  of  Anthony,  When 
a  mere  youth,  he  had  become  independent  and  wealthy  by  the  early  death  of 
his  parents.  On  one  occasion  he  stepped  into  the  temple,  and  heard  read 
from  the  gospels  the  word  of  the  Lord  to  the  rich  young  man.  Tliis,  like  the 
voic«  of  God  to  him  personally,  decided  his  future  course  of  life.  Ho  dis- 
tributed his  goods  among  the  i)Oor  (about  270),  and  betook  himself  first  to  a 
tomb,  and  then  to  a  dilapidated  castle  in  the  mountain,  there  to  wage  a  fear- 
ful conflict  with  himself  under  the  idea  of  an  encounter  with  Satan.  The 
visible  form  in  which  his  adversary  assailed  him,  was  sometimes  tliat  of  a 
beautiful  woman,  and  at  other  times  that  of  wild  beasts  and  monsters.  His 
friends,  who  brought  him  bread  once  in  six  months,  heard  his  wild  shrieks,  or 
found  him  powerless  and  prostrate  on  the  ground.  The  report  of  a  persecu- 
tion of  the  Christians  (311)  allured  him  from  his  solitude.  The  Alexandri- 
ans gazed  upon  this  man  of  the  desert  with  amazement.  In  the  very  courts  of 
justice,  he  encouraged  the  confessors  and  waited  upon  the  prisoners,  but  found 
not  a  martyr^s  death.  From  that  time  his  fame  spread  abroad,  the  desert 
became  peopled  with  his  disciples,  whom  he  directed  to  engage  in  prayer, 
and  manual  labor  for  their  own  support  and  for  the  relief  of  the  poor.  He 
himself  would  watch  through  many  nights  in  succession ;  bread  and  salt  was 
his  only  food,  and  of  this  he  partook  only  once  in  three  days,  ashamed  that 
an  immortal  spirit  should  need  even  that.  He  was  without  human  learning, 
but  endowed  with  eminent  natural  abilities,  and  in  the  service  of  the  Xing 
of  kings  was  exalted  above  the  fear,  as  he  was  afterwards  above  the  favor  of 
earthly  monarchs.  His  word  healed  the  sick  and  cast  out  devils.  "When  his 
prayers  were  answered,  as  they  not  unfrequently  were,  he  boasted  not  of  hifl 
power,  nor  did  he  murmur  when  they  were  unheard,  but  in  both  cases  he 
gave  praise  to  God.  No  angry  person  went  from  his  presence  unreconciled 
with  his  adversary,  and  no  mourner  uncomforted.  He  seemed  to  have  been 
provided  by  God  to  be  a  physician  in  bodily  and  spiritual  things  for  the 
whole  land  of  Egypt.  In  the  blissful  enjoyment  of  this  earthly  poverty,  it 
was  revealed  to  him  that  there  .was  one  man  more  perfect  than  himself. 
Since  the  Decian  persecution,  Paul  of  Thebes  had  resided  in  a  cave  of  the 
desert,  with  a  single  palm-tree  to  give  him  provision,  shelter,  and  clothing. 


CHAP.  IIL    ECCLE&  LIFE.    $  65.  ANTUONT.    S  «&  DISCIPLINE.  65 

Ninety  years  had  passed  away  since  tidings  of  him  had  reached  a  human  ear. 
Anthony  visited  him  in  season  to  witness  his  death  (340).'^  In  the  evening 
of  his  life,  and  annoyed  hy  the  honors  and  interruptione  of  men,  Anthony 
withdrew  still  further  into  the  desert,  where  he  cultivated  the  fruit  needful 
for  his  food,  and  presenting  himself  only  occasionally  among  men,  to  contend 
for  the  true  fedth,  or  to  protect  the  oppressed.  He  finally  attained  the  age 
of  a  hundred  and  ^vq  years,  when  he  expired  (866).  Ilis  glory  sprung 
from  no  hooks,  worldly  wisdom,  or  work  of  art,  but  only  from  his  piety ;  and 
he  departed  childless  indeed,  hut  the  father  of  an  innumerable  spiritual  family. 

§  66.    Ecclesiastical  Discipline. 

L  Ttrtul,  de  poenitentia.  Cifpr,  de  lapsis.  Eppi  eanonicM  Dionysii  AUaoandrini  (about  262), 
Orefforii  Tkaumatwffi^  P^ri  AletMndrini  (8(i6X  Canones  Cone.  lUSberitani, 

IL  7b&.  jyannsr^  de  catecbomeDls  aotlqnae  Eoe.  FrancoH  1688. — lo.  Morini^  Commentr.  hist  de 
dIadpllDa  in  admlnistr.  sacram  poenltentJae  XIIL  primls  8a«c  Par.  1651.  Antv.  1681.  Yen.  1702.  t 
FiHagSt  Bcitr.  a.  Oeech.  d.  TbeoL  n.  BeL  179&  toL  IL 

Candidates  for  admission  to  the  Ohurch  (Karrjxovfj^voi)  were  first  careful- 
ly instructed,  and  rigidly  examined  in  all  the  studies  of  the  several  stages  of 
their  education.  They  were  then  admitted  by  baptism  and  confirmation  to 
all  the  rights  and  privileges  of  a  Christian  citizen.  Such  a  process  was  re- 
garded as  important,  because  real  goodness  of  heart  and  a  good  character  were 
then  of  &r  greater  value  than  numbers.  A  high  degree  of  public  morality 
was  upheld  by  a  rigid  discipline.  Only  public  scandals,  or  offences  voluntari- 
ly confessed,  were  subjected  to  its  penalties.  All  who  appeared  unworthy  of 
Christian  fellowship  on  account  of  adultery,  murder,  or  apostasy  from  Chris- 
tianity, were  immediately  excommunicated.  These  could  be  restored  to  their 
former  position  in  the  Church  only  after  a  series  of  penances  adjusted  to  the 
nature  of  the  offence  by  the  various  codes  of  discipline,  and  sometimes  pro- 
tracted to  the  end  of  Ufe.  The  power  of  a  disturbed  conscience,  and  the 
terrors  of  an  exclusion  from  the  Church,  in  which  alone  salvation  was 
thought  to  be  attainable,  induced  many  to  undergo  the  most  fearful  penances. 
At  that  time,  few  could  perceive  a  distinction  between  an  abandonment  by 
God  and  an  exclusion  from  his  Church.  The  power  to  relax  the  severity  of 
the  penitential  laws  in  particular  instances,  was  indispensable  in  times  of  per- 
secution, on  account  of  the  multitude  of  those  who  fell  away  and  subsequent- 
ly returned  with  sorrow.  It  was  usually  exercised  by  the  churches  and  the 
bishops  with  scrupulous  restrictions,  but  by  the  confessors  and  martyrs  with 
80  much  indiscretion,  that  the  discipline  of  the  Church  was  in  danger  of  be- 
coming ineffectual.  In  general  the  principle  was  conceded,  that  every  actu- 
al penitent,  at  least  in  the  hour  of  death,  should  be  admitted  to  reconciliation 
for  ail  his  offences.  As  a  mere  outward  form  in  connection  with  excommu- 
nication, particular  bishops  or  synods  withdrew  ecclesiastical  fellowship 
from  whole  churches  or  parties,  on  account  of  what  was  regarded  as  un- 
christian sentiments. 

*  Bisron,  Tlta  Paali  Eremitaa.  Instanoea  more  like  that  of  the  Bhoemaker  at  Alexandria,  in 
FMm  JPair.  P.  IL  |  lit  eomp.  Apologia  Oonf,  Aug.  p.  286, 


66  ANCIENT  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  L    DIV.  XL    A.  D.  100-«12. 

§  67.     The  MontanUts, 

L  JBfuseb.  H.  eco.  Y,  8.  14-19.  Kplphan,  haer.  48&  Kindred  matten,  and  »  treatment  of  tiia 
subject  which  goce  much  beyond  ordinary  views  of  it  in  all  the  writings  of  TertuUian^  IL  G. 
Wlemsdor/^  de  Montanistla.  Gedani.  1751.  4.  F.  MUnter^  Effata  et  orac  Montanistar.  Ham.  1829. 
C.  M.  Kirckner^  de  Montantst  Ds.  L  Jen.  1832.  F.  C.  A.  SchitegUr^  d.  Montanlsmns,  n.  d. 
Kirehe  des  2  Jahrh.  TQb.  1841.    See  also  his  Nachapoet  Zeltalt  vol.  II.  p.  2599& 

In  an  excitement  which  originated  in  Phrygia,  and  extended  over  all  the 
churches  of  Asia  Minor,  not  only  the  rigor  of  ecclesiastical  morals  and  disci- 
pline, hot  the  extraordinary  zeal  which  prevailed  in  the  apostolic  Church, 
was  revived  and  even  exceeded.  It  was  there  maintained,  that  the  life  of  a 
true  Christian  was  a  continual  self-denial,  that  he  should  find  pleasure  in 
nothing  hut  God  and  a  martyr^s  death,  and  that  all  earthly  delights,  even 
those  which  science  affords,  are  sinful.  Murder,  lewdness,  and  apostasy  sub- 
jected those  who  were  guilty  of  them  to  a  hopeless  exclusion  from  the 
Church.  No  church  was  regarded  as  genuine  which  would  not  carry  out 
this  rigid  system  of  morals,  or  which  allowed  of  second  marriages,  and  re- 
admitted those  who  had  once  been  excluded  as  offenders.  Such  churches 
they  denominated  carnal  (the  ^vxtxo/),  superior  to  which  stood  the  Church 
of  the  Spirit  (the  iri^rv/iarifeoO)  since  the  Spirit  was  to  be  looked  for  in  the 
Church,  and  not  exclusively  in  the  assembly  of  the  bishops.  An  ecstasy 
which  proceeded  ftom  within  themselves,  or  a  divine  frenzy,  they  looked 
upon  as  the  most  exalted  condition  in  which  a  Christian  could  be  found.  A 
prophet  in  this  state  was  far  superior  to  a  bishop.  The  peculiar  form  of 
apostolic  Christianity  exhibited  in  the  Apocalypse,  while  struggling  with 
Gnosticism,  and  pressing  forward  after  a  still  higher  development  of  reli^on, 
might  possibly  have  become  gradually  perverted  into  this  Montanwn^  but  its 
assertion  respecting  higher  revelations  of  truth  to  be  expected  in  the  Church, 
indicates  a  consciousness  of  innovation.  Montanva  of  Mysia  is  designated  by 
some  contemporary  writers  at  a  diftance  ftom  him,  as  the  author  of  this 
movement.  He  had  probably  been  a  priest  of  Cybele,  and  was  at  this  time 
attended  by  two  prophetic  women.  With  the  imaginative,  enthusiastic  spirit 
which  characterized  his  fellow-countrymen,  he  announced  himself  as  the  in- 
dividual in  whom  the  promised  Paraclete  had  completely  revealed  himself, 
that  the  Church  might  be  carried  forward  to  its  perfection  just  before  the 
introduction  of  the  millennial  kingdom.  The  heavenly  Jerusalem,  the  me- 
tropolis of  that  kingdom,  was  to  descend  to  earth  at  Pepuza.  The  Montanists 
(o2  Karh  <^pvyasy  Pepuziaui)  were  expelled  fh>m  the  Church  by  the  Asiatic 
bishops  (about  170),  not,  however,  without  great  hesitation,  since  their  new 
prophecies  were  not  absolutely  inconsistent  with  the  doctrines  of  the  Church 
of  that  period,  and  it  was  therefore  difficult  to  determine  whether  they  were 
of  divine  or  demoniac  origin.  In  Asia,  they  continued  to  exist  under  an  ec- 
clesiastical constitution  of  their  own,  until  some  time  in  the  sixth  century. 
In  the  West,  their  moral  principles  obtained  an  influence  which  seemed 
almost  a  complete  victory.  What  Montanus  had  announced  in  a  fanatical 
spirit,  Tertullian,  with  his  polished  and  liberal  views,  presented  to  the  appre- 
hensions of  men  with  a  kind  of  twilight  distinctness.  All  that  either  of 
these  men  did  was  boldly  to  complete  what  nearly  the  whole  Church  of  that 


CHAP.  IIL    EOCLES.  LIFE.    S  6&  NOVATIAN&    S  69.  HOLY  BEASONa  67 

age  was  striTing  for,  and  merely  to  demand  of  every  one  what  was  admired 
in  individnal  saints,  but  which,  if  it  had  generally  prevailed,  wonld  either 
have  destroyed  the  Ohnrch  or  the  natare  of  man. 

§  68.     The  NoDatians. 

Cypr.  Epjx  41-52.  EuMb.  H.  ecc  VI,  43-45.  VIII,  8.  Oono.  yic  can.  «.  Cod.  Theod,  XVL 
tH  &  lex.  S.  Soorat  H.  eco.  I,  la  IV,  28.  V,  21. 

In  Opposition  to  Cornelius^  the  newly  elected  bishop,  Koratian^  his  pres- 
byter, violently  opposed  the  readmission  of  those  who  had  once  fallen.  This 
man  was  a  philosopher  who  had  embraced  Christianity  in  the  midst  of  sickness 
and  severe  spiritnal  conflicts,  and  after  his  conversion  had  become  an  ascetic, 
and  a  prndent  advocate  of  the  £uth  generally  embraced  in  the  Church.*  By 
his  own  party,  strengthened  by  some  persons  from  the  African  Church,  he 
was  elected  a  rival  bishop  (251).  The  Novations  excluded  from  the  Church 
all  those  who  had  been  guilty  of  deadly  sins,  and  taught,  that  while 
soch  should  be  exhorted  to  repentance  and  hope  of  the  divine  mercy, 
no  prospect  fihould  be  held  out  to  them  that  they  would  ever  be  readmitted 
to  a  Church  which  should  consist  only  of  saints  and  purified  persons  {Ka^apoi), 
They  withdrew  all  fellowship  from  the  Catholic  Church,  and  re-baptized  all 
who  came  from  it  to  them.  Their  party  was  sometimes  treated  with  re- 
elect, generally  with  forbearance,  and  by  the  emperor  himself,  at  Nicaea, 
with  good-humored  raillery,  but  it  was  overwhelmed  by  the  authority  of  the 
Gatholic  Church.  Its  adherents  continued  without  a  visible  organization  for 
some  centuries,  though  in  Phrygia  they  were  sometimes  confounded  with  the 
Montanists.  In  other  countries  also  a  similar  uncertainty  with  respect  to 
the  true  idea  of  the  Church,  and  strict  discipline,  produced  similar  divisions, 
but  all  these  necessarily  ceased  when  heathenism  was  overthrown,  and  mild- 
er views  gained  the  ascendency. 

§  69.    Holy  Seasons^  and  the  Controversy  about  Baster, 

Mfotpinianus^  Feste  chrtot  (Tlgnr.  1598.)  Geuev.  1674.  AuffuHi,  die  Feste  der  «Iten  Chritten. 
Lpn  1S17-9QL  8  Tola.  UUnumn^  Zosainmenst  des  chr.  Festcyclus  mit  vorchiistl  Festen.  Appendix 
to  Cre*uMr''9  Symbolik.  vuL  IV.  separately  printed  from  the  third  ed.  Darmst  1S43.  Staudfnmaier^ 
d.  GelM  d.  Chrtetenth.  in  d.  heil.  Zeiten,  HandL  n.  d.  heil.  Kanst  Matnz.  (U^.)  1888.  2  voIr. 

The  three  hours  of  the  day  observed  by  the  Jews  as  seasons  for  prayer, 
were  recommended  to  those  whose  secular  employments  were  likely  to  with- 
draw their  thoughts  from  God,  as  an  excellent  moans  of  I'eminding  them  of 
their  duty.  The  dawn  of  the  day,  and  in  times  of  persecution  the  night, 
was  preferred  for  public  assemblies.  That  they  might  give  special  solemnity 
to  their  higher  festivals,  the  preceding  night  was  made  a  part  of  them 
(vigilia).  In  determining  what  days  should  be  observed  as  holy,  they  paid 
attention  to  the  critical  seasons  of  Joy  or  grief  which  occurred  in  the  course 
of  our  Saviour^B  life.  Wednesday^  and  especially  Frid^iy  (dies  stationum, 
/eria  quarta  et  sexta),  were  consecrated  as  partial  fast-days  (till  8  p.  m.)  in 
eonmiemoration  of  his  sufferings.    The  Roman  Church  regarded  Saturday  as 

«  De  Trtnitate,  OppL  ed.  Jacikton,  Lond.  1728L  {OaUand,  Th.  lY.)    Cknnp.  ITirnvn.  eaUL  c.  7a 


68  ANaENT  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  L    DIV.  IL    A.  D.  100-81i. 

a  fast-day,  in  direct  opposition  to  those  who  regarded  it  as  a  Sabbath.  Sun^ 
day  remained  a  joyful  festival,  in  which  all  fasting  and  worldly  business  was 
avoided  as  mnch  as  possible,  but  the  original  commandment  of  tlie  Deca- 
logne  respecting  the  Sabbath  was  not  then  applied  to  that  day.  {a)  A  sea- 
son of  fasting  of  greater  or  less  lengtli  in  different  places  (afterwards  called 
Quadrigesima),  was  observed  just  before  the  passover.  In  Asia  Minor,  the 
paschal  supper  was  eaten  as  a  type  of  Christ^s  sacrifice  on  the  night  of  the 
fourteenth  day  of  the  month  Kisan.  But  in  other  parts  of  the  Chorch,  the 
Jewish  festival  was  altogether  set  aside.  The  Resurrection  of  onr  Lord  was 
celebrated  on  the  Sunday  after  the  full  moon  in  the  spring,  and  the  day  of 
his  death  on  the  Friday  preceding.  When  Polycarp  visited  Home  (about 
160),  this  difference  in  reckoning  was  discussed,  though  without  injury  to 
Christian  unity.  But  the  Roman  bishop  Victor  threatened  to  withdraw  ec- 
clesiastical fellowship  from  the  Asiatic  bishops,  on  acconnt  of  their  course  in 
this  matter  (196).  Public  opinion  was  in  favor  of  the  usage  in  the  Roouin 
Church  with  respect  to  this  festival,  but  the  violent  measures  pursued  by  the 
Roman  bishop  were  decidedly  condemned  by  all  distinguished  teachers,  (fi) 
The  fifty  days  which  immediately  followed  Easter  (Pentecost),  formed  a  sea- 
son of  festivity  for  the  commemoration  of  the  glorification  of  Christ,  and  the 
last  day  of  that  period  was  kept  as  the  proper  Pentecost ^  in  honor  of  the  effu- 
sion of  the  Holy  Spirit.  According  to  the  oldest  authorities,  heretics  were 
baptized  on  the  Feait  of  the  Epiphany^  w^hich  was  celebrated  in  conformity 
with  the  views  of  the  heretics,  in  commemoration  of  the  Manifestation 
(JnK^vfia)  of  the  Messiah.  In  this  festival  the  Church  had  reference  to  the 
revelation  of  Christ  in  the  flesh,  and  hence  in  the  oriental  churches,  after  the 
close  of  the  third  century,  the  sixth  of  January  appears  to  have  been  ob- 
served in  the  double  sense  of  a  baptismal  and  a  birth-day  festival,  (c)  Some 
churches  annually  celebrated  the  days  on  which  the  martyrdom  of  some  of 
their  number  took  place,  as  if  they  were  birth-days  (natalia),  when  Assem- 
blies were  held  around  their  graves ;  and  abont  the  close  of  the  third  centu- 
ry some  amusements  were  allowed  on  such  occasions.  Instead  of  the  heathen 
festivities  formerly  enjoyed,  (d)  As  these  martyrs  were  looked  upon  as  the  best 
representatives  of  Jesus  Christ  on  earth,  the  relation  of  the  Church  to  them 
was  that  of  an  affectionate  fellowship.  Even  then  we  find  some  indications 
of  a  confidence  in  their  power  to  aid  men  either  in  the  present  life  or  at  the 
final  judgment.  In  accordance  with  the  ancient  doctrine  of  the  saving  efiS- 
cacy  of  an  expiatory  death,  a  degree  of  influence  was  ascribed  to  their  death 
as  well  as  to  that  of  Jesus.  («) 

a)  F.  LiebHrut,  d.  Tag  d.  Herrn.  BcrL  1887.    F.  W.  Ji&cksr^  t.  Tage  d.  Herrn.  ErL  1S89. 

I)  Emeb.  H.  eoc  Y,  88-26.  Yita  Constant  III,  18.  Socrat  H.  eec  Y,  21.  Chionioon  pMcb.  ed. 
Dt^fresne,  Par.  1683.  Add.  N.  li.—Neand€r,  0.  Yeraulass.  u.  Beschaffenh.  d.  &It  PasaahstrelUgkelten. 
(KHist  Archiv.  182&  St  2.)  R^Uberg,  d.  Paachastreit  (Illgen's  Zeitschr.  1882.  B.  IL  St  2.)  Giateler 
in  d.  Stud.  a.  Krit  1883.  P.  4 

c)  Cl&ment  Strom.  L  p.  407b.  eom^  Ca»Hani  Collat  X,  ^.—Jahlonsky^  de  orlg.  festi  natiY. 
Chrlsti,  Da.  L  S  7.  (Opp.  Th.  IIL  p.  838fl&)    Gieteler  in  d.  HalL  Lit  Z.  1828.  p.  88«. 

d)  Greg.  Thaumaturgi  0pp.  ed.  Vom.  Mog.  1604  p.  812.  coznp.  Attguat  Ep.  29.  §  9.  ad 
AlTplum. 

«)  Fp.  BccL  Smynu  {Su$*b.  H.  eoc  lY,  16.)  CVp^**  d«  I*P^  c- 1^*  i"^  ^^)  Orig,  exhort  ad 
mart  c.60. 


CHAP.  m.    SOCLES.  LIFE.    1 70.  FESTIYALB.    1 71.  LOBD^S  SUPPER.  69 

§  70.    Sacred  Places  and  their  Deccration, 

CUtmpini,  Tett  nMnnmenta.  Rome.  1748.  8  Tola.  £  JaeuUi  cbr.  anUqultatam  speclmina.  Rome. 
179S.  4.  MUtnier^  Sinnbilder  a.  KonstTont  d.  alton  Chrtsteo,  Alton.  1S2S.  2  puts.  4.  OHknMnen^  ▼. 
d.  Unecb«n  n.  Orilnzeo  d.  KiiDSthanee  in  d.  ersten  8  Jabrh.  (Knnstblatt  1881.  N.  SSaa.)  [Jfir«.  Jam^ 
•on,  Sacred  and  Lcgendarj  Art  Lend.  1848L  3  Yola.  &  Lord  Lindsay^  Sketches  of  the  Hiat  of  Chris- 
UMMi  Art  Load.  1S47.  8  vula.  &] 

The  halk  in  which  the  Christians  were  accostomed  to  assemble,  were  fur- 
nished for  public  speaking  with  an  elevated  platform,  and  for  the  administra- 
tion of  the  Lord^s  Snpper  with  a  table  which,  near  the  end  of  the  second 
eentnrj,  was  called  an  altar.  Chnrches  began  to  be  constructed  after  the 
dose  of  the  third  century,  and  during  the  reign  of  Diocletian  some  were 
built  of  considerable  size.  When  the  people  very  generally  adopted  the  sen- 
timent, that  God  was  present  in  some  peculiar  sense  in  the  house  of  worship, 
their  more  intelligent  public  teachers  reminded  them  that  the  world  was  his 
temple,  (a)  Christians  were  fond  of  holding  their  religious  assemblies  over 
the  graves  of  the  dead,  and  sometimes  they  even  descended  into  the  vaults 
of  the  catacombs  to  find  a  place  for  prayer.  Such  places,  however,  at  least 
in  Rome,  were  never  fitted  to  accommodate  their  larger  assemblies,  (h)  The 
imitative  arts  had  flourished  principally  in  the  service  of  the  ancient  gods, 
and  hence  the  same  hatred  which  had  prevailed  against  them  among  the 
Jews,  was  continued  in  the  Christian  Church.  None  but  heathen  who  re- 
vered Jesus,  as  eitiier  a  sage  or  a  Son  of  God,  or  heretics,  who  mingled  to- 
gether pagan  and  Christian  principles,  ever  possessed  images  of  him.  In 
place  of  these,  however,  and  with  the  direct  object  of  excluding  heathen 
images,  were  introduced  various  Christian  emblems,  sach  as  the  cross,  the 
good  shepherd,  the  ram  and  the  lambs,  the  fisherman  and  the  fishes  (IX9YS), 
the  ship,  the  dove,  the  palm,  the  lyre,  the  phoenix,  and  the  cock  and  anchor. 
At  first,  these  were  used  only  in  private  dwellings,  but  gradually  they  were 
introduced  as  ornaments  of  tombs,  and  as  works  of  art  in  fresco  or  mosaic, 
to  decorate  their  churches.  But  even  as  late  as  the  fourth  century,  they 
were  censured  as  innovations,  (c) 

§  71.    Sacred  Services. 

The  worship  of  the  Temple  described  in  the  Old  Testament,  was  the 
model  to  which  was  conformed  as  much  as  possible  the  public  services  of  the 
Christian  assemblies.  In  compliance  with  the  spirit  of  the  times,  though  it 
was  originally  a  matter  of  necessity,  the  Lord's  Supper  was  administered  near 
the  dose  of  the  second  century  as  a  Christian  mystery,  with  the  view  of  in- 
vesting it  with  an  increased  sanctity  by  its  seclusion  and  secresy.  By  this 
means,  a  mysterious  character  was  imparted  to  a  number  of  the  usages  and 

a)  Tertmi.  de  orat  e.  84. 

b)  Comp.  nUron,  In  Ezocb.  o.  40.  After  the  works  of  BoHo^  Arringhi,  BUdetti^  and  BattaH, 
%ttRo9lMt  Boms  Katakomben.  (Bescbretbnng  der  Btadt  Rom,  von  Ptakt^r^  Butnt^n^  and  oth. 
Stott^  ISSOsa.  vol  L  pi».  854-416.)  C  F.  BelUrmann,  Q.  d.  filtesten  cbr.  BegrftbnlsMtfitten  u.  be«. 
d.  Katakomben  zn  Neapel  m.  lliren  Wandegemfihlden.  Ilamb.  1889.  4  [C.  Maitland^  The  Church 
ia  tba  Cataoomba,  or  a  Description  of  the  Prim.  Chorch  of  Rome,  new  ed.  Lond.  1S50.  8.] 

e)  Oonc  JUib&Hl  can.  8flu    Epiphan,  Ep.  ad  Ja  Hleroa.  (voL  IL  pb  817.) 


70  ANCIENT  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  L    DIY.  IL    A.  D.  100-818. 

forms  of  the  Church,  (a)  The  LoTd^%  Supper  was  celebrated  at  the  close  of 
every  solemn  assembly,  but  the  much-abused  and  more  infrequent  Lotc-Feast 
was  generally  held  apart  from  the  public  services,  and  in  the  evening.  The 
bread  and  the  wine  were  in  some  instances  regarded  as  the  symbols  of  the 
body  and  blood  of  Christ,  and  in  others  as  pervaded  by  the  Logos.  This 
sacred  ordinance  was  supposed  to  be  a  thank-offering,  and  to  have  some  spe- 
ciftl  influence  upon  the  resurrection  of  the  body.  The  consecrated  bread  was 
sent  to  those  who  were  absent,  or  taken  home  for  subsequent  use,  and  sometimes 
bottles  of  the  wine,  labelled  with  some  pious  toasts,  were  even  placed  on  the 
coffins  of  the  dead,  {h)  Origen  found  Infant  Baptitm  an  old  ancestral  usage 
in  the  region  where  he  resided,  but  others  advised  that,  as  a  matter  of  poli- 
cy, the  baptism  of  even  adults  should  be  deferred  as  long  as  possible  (pro- 
crastinatio).  (r)  The  solemn  act  by  which  the  worship  of  the  gods  was  ab- 
jured, taken  in  connection  with  the  Jewish  notion  of  the  expulsion  of  demons, 
gave  occasion  to  the  practice  of  uniting  Exorcism  with  the  ordinance  of  bap- 
tism. The  principle  that  baptism  was  to  bo  administered  but  once  to  the 
same  person,  was  universally  acknowledged.  But  the  African,  and  even 
some  of  the  Asiatic  churches,  baptized  those  who  came  to  them  from  any  of 
the  heretical  sects,  because  they  denied  the  Christian  character  of  baptism 
when  administered  among  those  sects.  The  Roman  Church,  however,  re- 
cognized the  validity  of  all  baptisms  in  which  the  subject  formed  a  fuH  pur- 
pose to  enter  into  fellowship  with  Christ,  (d)  Those  catechumens  who  suf- 
fered martyrdom  before  baptism,  were  looked  upon  as  haptized  in  blood. 
The  reception  or  addition  of  a  name  in  baptism,  had  reference  to  apostolic 
example,  and  a  cycle  of  Christian  names,  of  Jewish  or  heathen  origin,  was  in 
this  way  formed.  Sponsors  (dvdboxoi.  sponsores)  were  introduced  in  the  ad- 
ministration of  baptism,  that  they  might  be  sureties  for  the  good  intentions 
of  adult  candidates,  and  for  the  future  education  of  infants,  and  as  witnesses  in 
all  cases.  The  seasons  in  which  baptism  was  ordinarily  administered,  were 
Easter,  Pentecost,  and  Epiphany.  During  the  performance  of  the  rite,  the 
candidates  were  clothed  in  white  garments  (vestis  alba).  Tlie  imposition  of 
hands  for  the  communication  of  the  Holy  Ghost  (xftpoSfo-ta),  was  originally 
connected  with  and  immediately  followed  by  the  rite  of  baptism.  But  when, 
in  the  West,  the  imparting  of  the  gift  of  the  Spirit  was  looked  upon  as  the  pre- 
rogative of  the  bishops,  the  ceremony  of  contirmation  was  performed  as  a  dis- 
tinct rite.  The  intention  of  those  who  were  about  to  enter  the  marriage  rela^ 
tiofi^  was  previously  made  known  to  the  assembled  congregation.  The  betrothed 
parties,  after  partaking  of  the  Lord^s  Supper,  received  the  benediction  of  the 
priest.    There  was  much  contention  between  the  respective  advocates  of  the 


a)  These  were  not  called  disciplina  arcani  antil  after  the  Reformation,  and  in  the  Oatholie  Charch 
they  were  then  referred  as  apoetoUo  to  religioos  doctrines.  Controversial  writings  of  SeheUtrate 
and  T&tiUel.  IGTSss.  C.  Frommann^  de  disc.  arc.  Jen.  1S83.  B.  Rotht^  d«  di£C  ara  Heid^lk  ISIl. 
comp.  OrossmantL,  de  Judaeor.  disc,  arc  Lpa.  18888.  2  P.  4. 

b)  EtM«biM  jRomantu  (MabiUonX  de  cnltn  aanctoram  ignotor.  Par.  1688.  (ed.  2. 1705.)  i.  Beacbr. 
d.  Stadt  Horn.  vol.  I.  p.  40088.  BelUrmann^  p.  60a. 

c)  Orig.  in  Rom.  Y,  9.  (vol  IV.  p.  566.)    On  the  other  band :  TnfmL  de  bapt  c.  la 

d)  TaHnk  de  bapL  o.  lA.  Cypr,  Epp.  60-75.  Cone.  Garth.  III.  {Oypr,  Opp.  pw  IfiSaa.)— (Mar- 
cbetU)  Eaercitazioni  Ciprianlcbe  droa  U  battesluo  degU  eretloi.  Boxna.  1787. 


CHAP.  UL    ECCLE8.  LIFE.    |n.  CULTUB.    CHAP.  IT.    $72.  CANON.  71 

Jewish  and  the  Roman  law,  regarding  what  ought  to  be  considered  legal  im- 
pedimenti  to  marriage.  The  different  moral  principles  of  the  parties,  and  the 
precepts  of  the  Old  Testament^  were  looked  upon  as  valid  objections  to  all 
intermarriages  with  the  heathen,  (e)  Divorces  were  seldom  recognized  bj  the 
Chnrch  for  any  other  cause  than  adnltery.  All  who  had  died  in  the  Lord 
were  committed  to  the  grave  with  ecclesiastical  solemnities.  The  mode  of 
bnrial  was  generaUj  conformed  to  the  usages  of  the  ancient  Jews,  or  to  oth- 
er customs  not  InconsiBtent  with  the  habits  of  the  ancient  Romans.  On  an- 
niversaries of  the  decease  of  beloved  friends,  alms  were  distributed  in  their 
name  among  the  poor,  or  gifts  were  presented  in  their  behalf  at  the  altar,  by 
which  means  their  names  continued  to  be  remembered  and  mentioned  in  the 
prayers  of  the  Church. 


CHAP.  IV.— DOCTRINES  OF  THE  CHURCH,  AND  OPINIONS   OP- 

POSED  TO  THEM. 

§  72.    Sources  from  which  the  Church  derived  its  System  of  Faith. 

The  books  of  the  Old  Testament  were  at  first  the  only  books  which  the 
Church  regarded  as  sacred.  Although  Paulas  views  respecting  them  avoided 
an  extremes,  public  opinion  generally  agreed  with  him,  and  the  clergy 
did  not  hesitate  to  appeal  to  them  as  authority  for  what  they  wished  to 
prove.  Melito  visited  Palestine  for  the  express  purpose  of  ascertaining  what 
books  belonged  to  the  canon  of  the  Old  Testament,  and  finally  settled  upon 
those  recognized  by  the  Jews  of  that  region.  To  these,  Origen  subsequent- 
ly added  the  book  of  the  Maccabees,  (a)  and  as  the  Alexandrian  version 
(LXX.)  was  in  general  use  in  the  Greek  congregations,  all  the  books  em- 
braced in  it  (since  the  time  of  Jerome,  so  far  as  not  contained  in  the  original 
Hebrew,  called  the  Apocrypha  of  the  Old  Testament)  were  esteemed  as  of 
nearly  equal  authority.  But  the  necessity  of  the  case,  and  a  consciousness 
that  Christianity  had  much  peculiar  to  itself,  produced  during  the  second  cen- 
tury, from  the  writings  of  its  founders,  a  body  of  Sacred  Scriptures  exclu- 
uvely  its  own.  Justin  made  use  of  an  indefinite  multitude  of  apostolic  me- 
moirs, among  which  we  find  mentioned  a  gospel  of  the  Hebrews,  (b)  The 
nnity  of  the  Church,  however,  rendered  it  indispensable  that  there  should  be 
an  agreement  in  all  its  parts  respecting  the  canon  of  its  Holy  Scriptures. 
Mareion  was  probably  not  merely  the  first  witness,  but  in  accordance  with 
his  peculiar  views  of  the  nature  of  Christianity,  the  first  author  of  such  a 
canon.  He  testifies  to  one  gospel  and  the  ten  epistles  of  Paul,  but  those  who, 
in  a  short  time,  were  opposed  to  him,  mention  four  gospels,  the  Acts  of  the 
Apostles,  thirteen  epistles  of  Paul,  one  epistle  of  Peter,  and  one  of  John. 
Respecting  the  remaining  portions  of  the  New  Testament,  the  views  of  the 

tf)  TertuL  do  monog.  c.  7. 11.    Cypr.  de  lapsiB.  c  d. 

a)  EuMib.  H.  ecc.  IV,  2fi.    OHg.  in  P&  1.  (voL  II.  p.  529.) 

h)  Wlnsr^  JoBt  EvY.  cfto.  osam  ftiisM  oetenditnr.  Lpa.  1819.  4.  On  the  other  band :  Crsdner^ 
Btitr.  I.  EinL  in  d.  BibL  Schrr.  toL  I.  p.  Hies.  Comp.  Bindemann  in  d.  Stud  n.  Krit  1S48.  P.  2. 
Franek  in  d.  Btnd.  d.  G«iatUehk.  Wortemb.  1846.  P.  1. 


72  ANCIENT  CHUKCH  DISTORT.    PER.  L    DIV.  IL    A.  D.  100^2. 

Chnrch  were  not  then  qnite  settled,  (e)  In  deciding  whether  any  book  was 
canonical,  they  were  determined  on  the  one  hand  by  the  apostolic  character 
of  the  anthor,  and  on  the  other  by  the  Christian  popular  character  of  the 
book  itself.  In  conformity  with  the  views  of  the  Jews  respecting  the  Old 
Testament,  the  writings  of  the  Neto  Testament  were  regarded  as  inspired  by 
the  Holy  Ghost,  bnt  this  inspiration  was  looked  upon  only  as  the  higfaesi 
state  of  religions  fervor.  The  Holy  Scriptures,  in  the  ordinary  language  of 
the  people,  were  made  the  basis  of  all  public  devotional  exercises,  and  aD 
were  frequently  urged  to  peruse  them  in  private ;  but  copies  of  them  were 
very  expensive,  and  only  a  few  among  the  people  were  capable  of  reading 
them,  {d)  In  opposition  to  worldly  wisdom,  and  the  esoteric  doctrines  of  the 
heretics,  the  Church  appealed  to  the  literal  meaning  of  the  sacred  writ- 
ings, {e)  But  the  only  way  in  which  it  seemed  possible  satisfactorily  to  con- 
ftite  heretics,  was  by  appealing  to  Tradition^  (/)  by  which  was  meant  the 
doctrines  of  the  Church  orally  communicated  by  the  apostles  to  the  first 
bishops,  and  propagated  by  them  in  an  unadulterated  form  among  their  suc- 
cessors. It  was,  in  fact,  an  abstract  of  every  thing  which  the  Christian  con- 
sciousness of  each  age  had  uttered  through  public  opinion,  against  views 
inconsistent  with  it.  As  a  summary  of  these  traditionary  doctrines,  the  Apo%' 
tM  Creed  {g)  was  gradually  formed  out  of  the  confessions  of  faith  used  in 
baptism.  As  these  were  intended  to  be  opposed  to  the  heretical  opinions  of 
the  day,  this  creed  possessed  a  tolerably  uniform  character,  though  some  of 
its  particular  expressions  were  still  undetermined.  The  Rule  of  Faith  to 
which  some  ecclesiastical  fathers  alluded,  was  only  a  free  amplification  of  this 
creed,  adapted  to  the  wants  of  the  period  in  which  it  was  composed,  (fi)  In 
this  way  a  scale  was  in  practice  formed,  according  to  which  tradition  was 
placed  in  a  station  superior  to  that  of  the  Scriptures  as  a  rule  of  interpreta- 
tion and  a  necessary  complement  to  the  system  of  faith ;  and  the  Creed  was 
looked  upon  as  superior  to  tradition,  on  the  ground  of  its  being  an  author- 
ized abstract  of  it ;  but  in  principle  all  three  were  regarded  as  equally  safe 
and  necessarily  harmonious  sources  of  Christian  truth. 

§  78.    Apostolic  Fathers  of  the  Second  Century.    Contfrom  §  89. 

A  few  Asiatic  bishops  who  had  beheld  the  face  of  the  apostle  John,  were 
numbered  among  the  apostolic  Fathers.  Their  writings  belong  to  a  period 
anterior  to  the  cultivation  of  Greek  literature  and  the  principal  contest  with 
heathenism,  and  they  had  access  only  to  particular  books  of  the  New  Testa- 
ment. The  Seven  Epistles  of  Ignatius^  written  while  their  author  was  on 
his  journey  to  his  place  of  martyrdom,  have  been  altered,  certainly  in  their 

c)  J.  Kirchhofer^  Qaellensamml.  z.  Oeeeh.  x.  neatest  Cftn.  bis  Hieron.  Zftr.  1841. 

d)  F.  Walchy  T.  Oebrauch  d.  H.  Scbr.  in  d.  eraten  4  Jabrb.  Lpi.  1799.  (On  the  other  band : 
LeaHng^  SftmmtL  Scbrr.  BerL  1340.  vol.  XL  p.  Miss.)  L.  v.  Em^  AoszGge  (L  d.  notbw.  a.  nQtzI.  Bibel- 
les.  a.  d.  KV.  Lpe.  (1808.)  181<L    See  also  Lis  Chryoost  a  SUmmen  der  KV.  £  Blbellea.  Darmst.  18S1 

e)  Iren.  I,  8. 1.  Ill,  2.     TertiU.  de  resurrect  cam.  c  8. 

/)  Iren.  Ill,  8s.     TertnL  de  prescript  c  18-37.  de  o(m>na  o.  8. 

g)  Ri^flni  Expoeltio  in  Sfrob.  Ap^—Sir  Peter  King^  Hist  Symb.  of  the  Ape  Creed.  Lond.  1708.  a 
A)  Iren,  1, 10.     Tertul.  d.  virgg.  vel.  c  1.    De  praesor.  c  18.    Adv.  Prax.  c.  8.    Orig,  de  prlno. 
Prooem.  {  Abb.— A.  /AiAn,  BibL  d.  S/mb.  n.  OBegeln  d.  Ap.  Kath.  Kirche.  BreaL  1848. 


OHAP.  IT.    DOOTBINES.    |  78.  IGNATIUS,  POLTCABP,  PAPIAS.  73 

more  extended,  and  probably  in  their  most  abridged  form.  But  oven  the 
kUer  more  authentic  portions,  thongh  regarded  as  a  fabrication  of  the  mid- 
dle of  the  second  century,  give  ns  an  authentic  representation  of  the  high- 
wrought  feelings  of  a  martyr,  and  of  a  general  desire  to  secure  the  Christian 
uiity  of  the  congregations  to  which  they  were  addressed,  by  bringing  them 
together  under  the  jurisdiction  of  the  bishop.  Its  general  characteristics 
are,  a  ^irit  formed  under  the  combined  influence  of  Paul  and  John,  a  prac- 
tiesl  opposition  to  the  system  of  the  Docetae,  and  a  conception  of  Christian- 
ty  as  something  wholly  internal,  and  independent  of  historical  evidence,  (a) 
The  recently  discovered  Syriao  version  of  his  epistles,  and  especially  of  his 
epistle  to  tlie  Ephesians,  presents  us  with  a  much  more  concise,  but  a  no  less 
hierarchieal  text  (b)  The  epistle  of  Polycarp  to  the  church  of  Philippi, 
written  soon  after  the  martyrdom  of  Ignatius,  with  reference  to  that  event 
and  to  various  circumstances  connected  with  that  church,  is  a  modest  and 
iplritiial  w(n'k,  which  refers  to  Paul,  and  in  some  passages  reminds  us  of  the 
&8t  epistle  of  John,  (e)  Papias  (d.  about  168),  bishop  of  Hierapolis,  in  his 
iooount  of  the  &ots  in  the  life  of  our  Saviour,  has  recorded  those  things 
which  be  had  learned  from  the  lips  of  such  as  had  had  intercourse  with  the 
qiostleB.  Having  been  in  early  youth  a  pupil  of  John,  he  took  a  peculiar  plea- 
sore  in  the  living  word ;  and  it  was  only  when  he  was  judged  by  an  age 
whose  spirit  had  become  essentially  different,  that  he  was  accused  of  pos- 
rassing  a  very  contracted  mind,  {d) 

§  74.    Eecle^iastieal  Literature  and  Heresy, 

J.  G.  RoaenmiuUer^  de  chr.  TbeoL  orig.  Lpe.  178&    Marheinecke^  Ursprnng  u.  EntwickL  d. 

Ortbod.  -  j|~> '  In  d.  eisten  8  Jahrh.  (Daub.  a.  Crenzer,  Studlen.  1S08.  vol  III.)    B.  J.  UHqw^ 

bit.  Dant  d.  IlirMen  il  d.  Ortbod.  Hauptrlcht  v.  SUndp.  d.  Kath.  aa&  Bonn.  188T.  Ist  vol 

The  solo  object  of  the  gospel  was  to  awaken  and  to  satisfy  the  religious 
ipirit  of  man,  by  an  exhibition  of  a  true  religious  spirit.  But  when  it  came 
tmong  a  people  highly  educated  in  science,  and  was  pressed  by  opponents, 
this  spirit  was  obliged  to  seek  for  a  more  definite  consciousness  of  its  princi- 
ples.   Its  opponents  consisted  principally  of  those  who  attempted  to  form 

a)  PUy^.  Epi  e.  18.  Irtn,  V,  28.  OHg.  In  Luc  Iloro.  6.  (voL  HI.  p.  98S.)  Eu%tib.  II.  eoo.  Ill, 
81  M.  J.  Woohtr^  die  Br.  d.  b.  Ign.  ttbera  n.  erklort  T&b.  1329.— lA  Daliaem,  de  acriptts,  quae  Bub 
Dton.  et  Ignatil  nomm.  circnmferantur.  Oon.  16Sd.  i.—Baur,  tn  d.  T&b.  Zeitschr.  1SH8.  P.  3.  p.  14S68. 
/.  K  CJC  Schmidt,  d.  doppelte  Rec.  d.  Br.  d.  Ign.  (Henke's  Mag.  vol.  III.  p.  91  ss.  abbreviated  In  bli 
KGeach.  Tli.  L  p.  «KK)  G.  C.  NsU,  Vera.  0.  d.  Br.  d.  Ign.  an  Polyk.  (Stud.  u.  Krit.  1SS5.  P.  4.)— 
£  M0Ur,  d.  dopp.  Bee.  d.  Br.  d.  Ign.  (Stud.  u.  Krit  1888.  P.  %y-J.  rmrson,  Vlndioiae  Epp.  S.  Ign. 
aec  /.  Votni,  Epp.  CaoUbr.  1872.  4  {CoUUr.  PP.  app.  Th.  IL  P.  II.  p.  23<fe«.)  Jioth^,  Anfango  d. 
Kifche.  vol  L  pw  713mi  Uuther  In  Illgen'a  Zeitachr.  1841.  P.  4.— CA.  D&«Urdltck,  quae  de  Ignalla- 
aaram  epp.  aatbentia,  dncrnmque  textunm  ratlone  bucusque  prolatae  aunt  cententiae  enarrantur. 
OotLlM8L4. 

I)  The  aodent  Sjrlac  Tersion  of  the  epistles  of  8.  Ign.  to  S.  Polyc.  tbe  Epbeslans  and  Bomans, 
eullected  from  tbe  wriUngs  of  Sevema  of  Antlocb,  Timotb.  of  Alexandria,  and  otbers.  by  William 
Curttim,  Lond.  184Bl 

e)  Irtm,  III,  &  XuMib.  H.  ace.  Ill,  8S.  Y,  Sa  WocKsr,  Br.  d.  apost  Yftter  Clem.  u.  Polyc.  Cibert. 
■L  Com.  T&bu  1830.  Beasona  in  Opposition  to  ita  Genuineness :  SchtcegU^,  Nacbapost  Zetta.  vol 
ILpLlMflu 

tf)  Soyl^p  Kvptaic^  ^{^Tiyo'if.  Lost  except  an  inconsiderable  fhigment  Tren.  Y,  83.  Stueb. 
&eec  III, as.  oomp.  86u  Chroo.  ad  Olymp.  290.  Grabe,  Spidl  Patr.  P.  IL  p.  S4aB.  M&nter,  Fragmm. 
Ptt.  graae.  Halta.  178&  tuc  L  p.  IHml  Oomp.  iTatc,  BlbL  d.  bail  Oescb.  voL  L  p.  897as. 


74  ANCIENT  CnUBCn  HISTORY.    PBB.  L    DIY.  IL    A.  IX  100^811. 

such  a  historical  embodiment  of  its  nature  as  would  afford  no  room  for  the 
religion  of  the  spirit,  and  of  those  who  aimed  at  saoh  a  speculative  refine^ 
ment  as  threatened  to  destroy  every  historical  element  in  Christianity.  The 
former  proceeded  from  the  schools  of  Judaism,  and  the  latter  from  those  of 
heathenism.  Tlie  principles  which  finally  obtained  the  asoendenoy,  and  for 
that  reason  only  became  those  of  the  Catholic  Church,  moved  on  with  oon- 
scions  security  between  both  these  extremes,  although  theological  science  was 
at  different  periods  attracted  more  to  the  one  side  than  to  the  other.  Chria- 
tionity  was  at  first  regarded  as  embracing  so  wide  a  range,  that  Justin  did 
not  hesitate  (Ap.  I.  c.  46.)  to  consider  Socrates,  and  all  those  who  had  lived 
up  to  the  light  of  reason,  as  Christians.  But  the  more  the  Church,  during 
its  severe  conflicts,  became  conscious  of  its  true  nature,  the  more  decidedly 
was  every  thing  opposed  to  it  separated  from  it  as  a  Hereay^  i.  e,  as  what 
ought  to  have  been  and  claimed  to  be  Christian,  and  yet  really  was  not.  In 
this  way  it  may  have  happened,  that  instead  of  an  unchristian  party,  only  a 
vanquished  minority  was  sometimes  excluded.  The  literature  of  this  period 
was  sophistical,  and  neither  creative  in  its  essential  character,  nor  attractive 
in  its  style.  The  energy  of  faith  which  theological  science  then  exhibited, 
was  sufficient  to  supply  the  place  of  both  these  qualities,  but  oould  not  call 
them  into  existence. 

§  75.     Ehionism,     ConU  from  §  35. 

GieneUr^  Naz.  u.  Ebion.  (Stuudlin's  u.  Tzscliirner's  Arch.  vol.  IV.  Part  2.)  I£a»e,  IL  d.  EmpfSng- 
er  d.  Br.  an  d.  Hebracr.  (Winer's  u.  Engelh.  Joum.  vol.  IL  P.  3.)  L.  Lange^  B«itrr.  z.  Ut.  KGeseb. 
Lps.  1926.  vol.  \.—JUntr  and  Ikhicegler  (before  §  20.)  On  the  other  hand :  A.  SohlUmann^  die 
Clementincn  nebst  den  verwandten  Bchrlften  o.  der  Eblonitlsmus.  Ilamb.  ISiL 

As  the  whole  power  and  development  of  the  Church  was  established 
among  nations  subject  to  Greek  refinement  and  civilization,  the  Jewish  por- 
tion of  the  Christian  community,  in  its  seclusion,  began  to  be  regarded  as  a 
mere  sect,  and  the  old  name  of  NazareneSy  by  which  Christians  in  Palestine 
had  been  distinguished,  as  well  as  that  of  Ebionites^  (a)  which  was  probably 
quite  as  ancient,  and  had  been  applied  to  the  congregations  at  Jerusalem  and 
Pella,  became  simply  designations  of  particular  sects.  Justin  (h)  made  a  dis- 
tinction between  those  Jewish  Christians  who  were  satisfied  with  their  own 
observance  of  the  Mosaic  law,  and  those  who  demanded  that  converts  tram 
heathenism  should  observe  the  same  law  as  a  necessary  condition  of  salva- 
tion. The  former  he  recognized  as  brethren,  though  even  at  that  early  pe- 
riod such  a  recognition  had  ceased  to  be  universal  among  his  fellow-Chris- 
tians ;  but  the  latter  he  looked  upon  as  incapable  of  salvation.  Origen  (e) 
found  a  type  of  the  Ebionites  in  the  blind  man  who  prayed  to  the  son  of  Da- 
vid,  Eusebius  (d)  looked  upon  them  as  persons  who  were  deluded,  but  not 
wholly  estranged  from  Christ,  and  Epiphanius  was  the  first  to  pour  upon  them 
the  vials  of  that  wrath  which  all  heresies  provoked  from  him.  Even  at  this 
early  period,  however,  there  were  not  many  Jewish  Christians  beyond  the 
borders  of  Syria  and  Palestine.    It  is  not  impossible  that  a  congregation  at 


a)  Bpiphan.  haer.  80, 17.    On  the  other  band :  TertuL  de  praescr.  a  88. 

I)  Q.  l>7pb.  a  47.     e)  In  llottb.  torn.  16.  (Tb.  IIL  p.  7888a.)     (Q  H.  eoe.  Ill,  S7. 


CUAP.  IV.    DOCTTiUNKS.    1 7&  EBIONISM.    {  76w  GNOSTICISM.  75 

Borne  was  the  only  one  composed  exclusively  of  them.  Bat  many  even  of 
these  had  renounced  circmncision  and  all  that  was  essential  to  their  pontion, 
and  retained  nothing  bat  an  empty  protest  against  the  apostolic  authority  of 
PAoI.  Attempts  at  an  accommodation  with  this  party  on  the  side  of  the 
great  Church,  would  not  therefore  seem  probable,  nor  have  we  any  accounts 
of  such  attempts  from  contemporary  writers.  Even  the  Christianity  of  Paul 
had  an  acknowledged  basis  in  the  Jewish  system,  and  not  only  were  some 
fragments  of  the  Mosaic  law  unintentionally  preserved  in  the  habits  and 
customs  especially  of  the  churches  of  Asia  Minor,  but  others  were  restored  in 
order  to  promote  certain  hierarchical  ends.  The  second  epistle  of  Peter,  and 
the  union  of  the  names  of  Peter  and  Paul  in  the  watchword  used  at  Rome,  may 
have  been  occasioned  by  those  Jewish  Christians  who  needed  such  a  recon- 
dUation  with  the  general  Church,  (e)  Irenaeus  was  the  first  who  reckoned 
the  Ebionites  indiscriminately  among  heretics.  Their  doctrine  respecting 
Jesus  was  the  same  with  that  taught  by  Cerinthus ;  they  adhered  to  the  Mo- 
saic law,  used  only  one  gospel,  which  was  that  according  to  Matthew,  and 
rejected  the  authority  of  Paul  as  an  apostate.  (/)  Origen  and  Eusebius  dis- 
tinguish between  two  different  classes  of  Ebionites,  which  were  agreed  in 
their  opposition  to  the  progressive  creed  of  the  Church,  but  differed  from 
each  other  in  their  Jewish  representations  of  the  Messiah.  The  one  regard- 
ed Christ  as  the  son  of  Mary  and  Joseph ;  the  other  looked  upon  him  as  bom 
of  the  virgin  through  the  Holy  Ghost,  and  acknowledged  him  to  be  a  super- 
human, but  not  a  divine  being.  (<f)  Jerome  was  the  first  who  appropriated 
the  name  of  Nazarenes  exclusively  to  that  party  which  held  to  the  higher 
view  of  the  nature  of  Christ,  and  were  most  tolerant  toward  the  Gentile 
Christians,  and  he  declares  that  they  were  united  together  in  the  most  de- 
lightful fraternal  affection,  (h)  When  he  wrote,  they  still  maintained  their 
synagogues,  in  which  were  found  Elders  and  Overseers ;  but  in  the  seventh 
century  they  had  completely  dwindled  away,  unable  to  maintain  their  posi- 
tion between  the  parties  then  contending  for  supremacy,  and  to  both  of 
which  they  professed  adherence. 

§  76.    I.  Gnosticism. 

L  Iren.  ady.  baeresee^  TertuL  de  praescriptloDibns  haereticornm.  Epiph.  adr.  haeroaes,  and 
7%eodorett  baeretioorum  fabb.  articlea  relating  to  the  mibject.  All  the  ecclesiastical  writers  of  this 
period,  especially  Clement  and  Origen  in  particnlar  passages. — PMir.wt,  wpos  rohs  ytfutrriKovt. 
CEnnead.  IL  lib.  9.)  ed.  G.  IT.  Heigl  Ratisb.  1882.    Comp.  Stud,  xl  Krit  1834.  P.  2. 

II.  Maetuet^  Dsa.  pre  viae  to  his  edit  of  Irenaeus.  Moehemii  de  rob.  Christ  ante  Const  p.  88868. 
[traoalAted  into  English  by  R.  &  VidaL  Lond.  1818.  2  vols.  8.  and  by  Dr,  Murdoch.  New  York. 
1350.]    (JrfifUtfr,)  Vers.  Xl  d.  kirchL  Alterth&mer  d.  Onostiker.  Ansb.  1790.    E.  A.  Lewald^  de  doctr. 

gnosticm.  Heidelb.  1818.    Neander^  genet  Entw.  d.  gnoat  Systeme.  BrL  1818.    See  also  his  Uist  of 

It 

e)  Schwegler^  nachapost  Zeita.  vol  I.  p.  490ss. 

^)  I,  8S.  (The  difficulty  of  the  passage  is  to  be  removed  not  by  correction,  bat  by  panctnation) : 
Conaentiunt  quidem  raundnm  a  Deo  fihctoro,  ea  aatem,  quae  sunt  erga  Dominom,  non  similiter:  at 
Geslnthas  et  Carpocrates  opinantar. 

g)  Orig.  c.  Ceta.  V,  61.  65.    Euatib.  H.  eco.  Ill,  27. 

h)  In  JesaL  VIII,  9. 18.  XXIX,  20.  XXXL  686.  comp.  Ep.  ad  Aug.  112.  (al.  89.)  Epiph.  haer. 
S9,  7!«.  On  the  other  hand:  AttgutL  c.  Faost  XIX,  1&  with  reference  to  the  Nazarenea  says: 
In  ea  perversitate  manseront,  ut  et  gentes  oogtrent  jadainra. 


76  ANCIENT  CnURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  L    DIV.  IL    A.  D.  100-81i 

the  Cbr.  R«L  [Torrey's  Trand.  toL  L  ppi  866-476.]  Zfidbtf,  0.  d.  Onost  Sjstoine  n.  was  neaflrlieli 
dafOr  gethan  1st  (Tbeol.  Zeitscbr.  Brl  1819.  vol  L  sect  2.)  Gieuler^  Church  Hist  [Davidson'a 
TransL  Edlnb.  1846.  vol  L  f  ^]  uid  in  Halle  Lit  Zelt  1828.  X.  104n>.  J.  Matter,  Hist  crlt  da 
gnoettcisme.  Par.  (1828.)  lS4a  2  Th.  J.  J.  Schmidt,  0.  d.  Yerwandtsch.  d.  gnost  theoa.  Lehnui  m. 
d.  ReltgiuDftsystamen  d.  Orients,  tots,  des  Boddbaism.  Lpa.  1828.  (Cumpi  Gie«eUr  in  d.  Stnd.  a.  Krit 
168a  vol  I.  p.  87dM.)  MohUr,  Vers.  IL  d.  Urspr.  d.  Gnostic.  T&b.  1381.  4  Baur,  d.  cbristl.  Onosli 
in  gescbicbtL  Entw.  T&b.  1S85.  and  Stud  n.  Krit  1687.  P.  &  Baumgarten-CniHut,  Comp.  d. 
DOescb.  ToL  I.  p.  8l8&  Ritter,  Ge«ch.  d.  chr.  Phil  Hamb.  1841.  vol.  L  p.  10988.  [K.  Burton,  Inq. 
into  the  Heresies  of  the  Apoet  Age.  Bampt  Loctt  Ox£  1S29.  An  Epitome  of  the  Hist  of  PhO. 
transL  fh>in  the  French  by  C.  8.  Henry.  New  TorlL  1841.  2  vols.  12.  Per.  IIL  %  1.  Tennemann^% 
Manual  of  the  II.  of  PbiL  transL  bjr  A.  Johntan.  Oxt  1882.  6.  J.  P.  PoUer,  in  Kitto*s  Cycl  of  BibL 
Lit  art  Gnosticism.  J,  D.  Maurice,  Hist  of  Philosophy,  during  the  first  six  oeDtnriea  Lond.  1854,] 

No  sooner  had  Oriental  become  mingled  with  Hellenistic,  and  especiallj 
with  Platonic  speculations,  than  the  old  problem  of  speculative  philosophy 
respecting  the  derivation  of  the  finite  ftom  the  infinite,  became,  in  conse- 
quence of  the  profound  consciousness  which  the  age  then  possessed  of  its  in- 
ternal distractions  and  longings,  the  object  of  an  extensively  ramified  system. 
The  name  Gfw»i$  was  applied  to  an  extraordinary  insight  into  divine  things, 
beyond  the  system  of  faith  which  the  people  commonly  received  on  author- 
ity. The  commencement  of  Gnosticism  may  be  discovered  even  in  the  time 
of  the  apostles,  (a)  but  its  influence  never  became  sufficiently  developed  to 
appear  dangerous,  until  since  the  reign  of  Tr^an.  (h)  Its  usual  fundamental 
principles  were :  a  God  with  no  connection  whatever  with  our  world,  and  a 
matter  entirely  underived  from  and  independent  of  the  Deity ;  a  revelation  of 
the  unknown  deity  by  means  of  an  intermediate  divine  being,  whose  contact 
with  matter  gave  existence  to  our  world,  and  all  its  series  of  events ;  a  re- 
demption of  whatever  is  divine  but  confined  in  the  material  world,  in  conse- 
quence of  the  personal  interference  of  a  divine  being  in  the  affairs  of  the 
world.  Wherever  the  peculiar  principles  of  Gnosticism  gained  the  ascend- 
ency, the  intermediate  divine  being  became  individualized  in  a  descending 
series  of  celestial  natures  (aiuvc r),  (e)  from  the  lowest  class  of  which  proceeded 
the  Creator  of  the  world  (firjfuovpyoi)^  and  from  the  highest  the  Redeemer. 
Gnosticism,  like  New-Platonism,  was  obliged  to  enter  deeply  into  the  popu- 
lar religion  of  that  period,  and  to  become  a  philosophy  of  the  three  great 
forms  of  religions  then  in  conflict.  It  even  went  still  further,  and  aimed  to 
become  a  particular  form  of  religion  itself.  Its  oriental  element  was  derived 
from  Persia,  and  was  a  dreamy  blending  of  sense  and  allegory.  Simon  and 
Cerinthus  had  already  shown  how  it  could  be  brought  into  alliance  with  Ju- 
daism, but  where  no  feelings  of  piety  prevented,  its  advocates  very  naturally 
recognized  their  Demiurge  in  the  representations  of  Jehovah  in  tlie  Old  Tes- 
tament. On  becoming  involved  in  the  powerful  movements  of  Christianity, 
its  principles  were  in  some  measure  accommodated  to  those  of  the  gospel, 
and  never,  indeed,  found  full  development  until  it  became  connected  with 

a)  I  82.  87.  jet  oomp.  C  C.  TiUmann,  de  vestlgiis  Onosticor.  in  N.  T.  fimstra  qoacaitis.  Lpf.  177& 
[transL  and  pobL  In  Contrlbb.  to  For.  TheoL  Lit  New  York.  1827.  8.]  J.  Horn,  Bibl.  Gnosisw  Hann. 
1805.— PawZtM,  die  drey  Lehrbriefb  ▼.  Jo.  Hetdelb.  1629.  Baur,  die  sogen.  Pastoralbrr.  d.  Ap.  Pan- 
Ina.  Stuttg.  1^5.  On  the  other  hand:  Jf.  Baumgarten,  di»  Aecthelt  d.  Pastoralbrr.  vertbeidigt 
BerL  1887. 

b)  HegeMpp.  in  Etueb.  H.  eoa  III,  82.  IT,  22.    CUm,  Strom.  YII,  17.  (p.  89a) 
e)  In  aoourdanc*  with  the  system  of  Aristotle,  de  ooelo  I,  9. 


CnAP.  IT.    DOCTRINBS.    1 7&  ON03TICISBL    |  H.  8ATUSNINUS.  77 

that  faith.  In  the  God  of  the  Christian  system,  its  votaries  recognized  their 
own  perfect  God,  in  Ghrbt  their  redeeming  Aeon,  in  the  Christianity  which 
he  really  preached  their  secret  traditions,  and  in  the  faith  proclaimed  hy  the 
Church,  the  natural  mode  of  representation  in  which  these  became  adapted 
to  the  popular  mind.  Its  ethical  system,  in  which  the  greatest  contempt  for 
the  world  was  expressed,  harmom'zed  with  the  most  rigid  requirements  of  the 
Church,  and  only  a  few  of  its  parties  were  so  demoralized  as  to  justify  licen- 
tiousness, on  the  ground  of  an  exaltation  above  the  terreetrial  law  of  the 
Demiurge.  The  founders  of  the  different  Gnostic  parties  have  been  made 
known  to  us  in  history,  but  we  are  nowhere  informed  of  him  who  originated 
the  great  system  common  to  them  all.  The  predominance  of  the  Oriental, 
the  Hellenistio,  the  Christian,  or  the  Jewish  element,  presents  us  with  a  con- 
venient principle  in  accordance  with  which  these  Gnostic  systems  may  natu- 
rally be  classified. 

§  77,    II.  Syrian  Gnoaties, 

1)  Satuminus,  who  lived  at  Antioch  in  the  time  of  Trajan,  taught  that 
there  was  opposed  to  the  good  Deity  (rrar^p  Syv<o(rros)  a  wild,  tempestuous 
kingdom  of  evil,  under  the  dominion  of  Satan.  From  the  former  emanated 
the  ^iritual  world  of  Aeons.  At  its  lower  confines  were  placed  the  seven 
phinetary  spirits  (rfyycXot  KoatioKparopti),  Far  away  from  their  divine  source, 
but  battling  with  the  kingdom  of  darkness,  these  formed  the  world  of  sense, 
and  made  man  according  to  their  obscure  recollections  of  the  image  of  God. 
But  the  work  which  they  had  thus  formed,  helplessly  collapsed,  and  could 
not  stand  erect  until  the  unknown  Father,  pitying  them,  sent  into  it  a  spark 
of  divine  life.  In  opposition  to  this  new  race,  Satan  formed  another  after  his 
own  image.  To  redeem  the  more  exalted  race  from  the  power  of  Satan  and 
of  the  planetary  spirits,  one  of  the  highest  Aeons  {yovi\  as  Christ,  assumed 
the  semblance  of  a  body.  That  men  may  be  redeemed,  they  must,  on  their 
part,  abstain  fVom  every  thing  which  brings  them  under  the  power  of  matter. 
The  followers  of  Satuminus,  for  this  reason,  abstained  from  marriage,  and 
many  of  them  even  from  fiesh.  (a)  After  a  brief  period,  nothing  is  known 
respecting  them.  2)  The  DUciplea  of  John^  in  the  second  century,  looked 
upon  John  the  Baptist  as  the  true  Messiah,  though  others  regarded  him  as  an 
angel  in  human  form.  Among  the  Simonians,  he  was  supposed  to  have  been 
the  teacher  of  Simon.  Though  nothing  was  known  of  the  Nazoraeans  (Men- 
daeans,  Zabians)  until  they  were  discovered  by  missionaries  in  Persia  in  the 
seventeenth  century,  their  peculiar  Johannic  system  of  Gnosticism  could  only 
have  originated  when  a  particular  party  professed  adherence  to  John,  and 
when  Gnosticism  was  in  its  forming  state.  They  believed  in  a  kingdom  of 
darkness  as  well  as  of  light,  in  a  formation  of  the  world  and  a  struggle 
with  the  powers  of  darkness  by  an  ambiguous  intermediate  being  (Fetahil) ; 
that  Judaism  was  the  work  of  gloomy  planetary  spirits ;  that  the  redeeming 
Aeon  appeared  to  John,  and  that  Jesus  was  a  false  prophet,  anointed  by  the 
planetary  spirits.  Baptism  they  regarded  as  an  act  of  consecration  to  be  an- 
nually repeated,  and  daily  ablations  were  practised  as  a  religious  duty.  (J>) 

a)  Jren.  1, 84    Eptph.  baer.  sa 

»)  L  Aek  18»  SB.  19,  S-7.    OUmeiU.  B«cogn.  1, 54  60.  and  HomiL  II,  S8bb.    Mieron,  in  Aggeum. 


78  ANCIENT  CHTRCn  HISTORY.    P£R.  L    DIY.  IL    A.  D.  100-411 

§  78.    m.  Hellmutu  Gnotties. 

1)  Basilides^  who  lived  at  Alexandria  in  the  time  of  Hadrian,  belleyed 
that  from  the  ineffiible  Ood  (dcor  apprfroi)  proceeded  certain  images  of  him- 
self according  to  the  numeral  relations  of  astronomy.  The  first  of  these 
were  seven  celestial  powers  (dvvafictr),  who,  with  the  being  from  whom  they 
sprang,  constituted  the  first  spiritual  kingdom  {ovpav6i).  From  this,  in  a 
gradnally  descending  series,  proceeded  three  hundred  and  sixty-four  other 
spiritual  kingdoms.  The  mystical  watchword  Abraxas^  represents  the  God 
revealed  in  these  three  hundred  and  sixty-five  spiritual  kingdoms,  in  distinc- 
tion from  him  who  is  the  Ineffable,  (a)  The  seven  angels  belonging  to  the 
lowest  of  these  spiritual  kingdoms,  the  first  among  whom  is  the  Grod  of  the 
Jews  (Spx<op\  created  this  world  out  of  matter,  and  bestowed  upon  the  hu- 
man race  inhabiting  it  all  earthly  endowments,  together  with  all  the  spirit- 
ual powers  which  they  themselves  possessed.  To  effect  the  deliverance  of 
this  spiritual  power  from  its  bondage  to  matter,  the  first-begotten  celestial 
power  (vovs)  united  himself  with  Jesus  at  his  baptism.  Though  this  Jesus 
was  a  perfect  man,  he  needed  an  expiation  for  his  own  sake,  and  it  was  he 
alone  who  suffered  and  died.  The  Archon  was  from  the  first  only  an  uncon- 
scious agent  of  divine  providence,  and  he  no  sooner  discovers,  from  the  words 
of  Jesus,  the  actual  design  of  God,  than  he  submitted  himself  to  it  with  de- 
vout reverence.  An  entrance  into  the  kingdom  of  the  Redeemer,  is  effected 
by  a  spiritual  surrender  of  the  soul  to  him  (niarts),  and  is  by  no  means  in- 
compatible with  a  denial  of  him  who  was  cracified.  The  Basilideans^  who 
existed  late  in  the  fourth  century,  appear  only  to  have  embraced  this  doc- 
trine of  spiritual  freedom  in  a  still  more  decided  form,  and  to  have  claimed 
an  elevation  above  all  positive  religious  rites.  Q>)  2)  Valentine^  who  went 
from  Alexandria  to  Rome  about  140,  and  died  in  Gyprus  about  160,  has 
given  us  a  most  ingenious  representation  of  Platonic  ideas,  in  his  fancifrd 
scheme  of  the  universe.  In  the  depths  of  the  Great  Urst  Gause  03v3or, 
irpon-oTcdp),  existed  Self-consciousness  (Jlwoia)  and  Silence  (aiyrj).  This  con- 
cealed God  reveals  himself  in  three  series  of  Aeons,  in  the  names  of  the  In- 
effable, in  certain  images  of  God,  and  in  the  original  types  of  all  spiritual 
life,  which  emanate  from  him  in  pairs  ((rvfvyot),  and,  in  contrast  with  empty 
chaos  (Kivatfia),  collectively  represent  the  fulness  of  the  revealed  divine  life 
(nkrjpuifia).  Every  thing  in  the  Pleroma  has  its  individual  properties  assigned 
to  it  by  Measure  and  Limitation  (opos).  But  Sophia,  the  Aeon  most  remote 
frt>m  the  great  Original,  languished  on  account  of  its  passionate  longings  to 


0. 1.  Part  6.—IffnaUi  a  Je9u  narratlo  originls,  litanm  et  erroram  Chrlstlanoniiii  B.  Jo«nni&  Bom. 
1652.  Codex  Kazanens,  liber  Adaml  appellatoi,  syrlaoe  transorfptiu,  let  reddltua  a  Mai.  Norberg, 
Ltind.  1S15B.  8  vol&  4.— II.  Tyeh»eny  in  the  Deatsoh.  Mns.  1784.  toL  IL  p.  414.  (?M0nt'iM,  Art  Zft- 
bier,  in  the  prooflibeets  of  the  Encyelop.  1817.  X.  E.  Burckhardt^  les  Nazordenfl  oa  Mandai-Jahfa. 
Btrasb.  1840. 

a)  BMermann^  die  Oemmen  der  Alten  mit  d.  Abrazas-Bilde.  BerL  1817aB.  P.  8.  Gieul€r,  in  d. 
Btnd.  u.  Krlt  1880.  P.  2.  p.  408a8. 

h)  The  original  la  scattered  tbroughoat  Clement's  Btromm.  and  in  the  ZtlavKoXia  dyaroAun) 
ascribed  to  him.  The  flgorative  and  fknd/hl  side  and  its  degenerate  state  in  Irtn,  I,  ai,  daa.  II,  Itf* 
9.    Epiph.\ma.%L 


CHAP.  IT.    DOCTKDfSB.    §78.  VALENT1NIAN8.  79 

be  rennited  with  its  Source.    This  THsdom,  the  Aehcmot\  (e)  agitated  bj  the 
intensity  of  its  desires  and  wandering  awaj  from  the  Pleroma,  communica- 
ted life  to  matter  and  gave  birth  to  the  Deminrge.    The  latter  formed  the 
world  out  of  chaos  in  such  a  way  that  the  divine  idea,  though  correctly,  is 
iDAdeqnately  and  feebly  represented  in  its  actoal  scenes  and  events.    To  re- 
store harmony  to  the  Fleroma,  a  new  emanation  of  a  pair  of  Aeons  (Xpitrrof 
and  Jlyfvfia  Syiov)  takes  place,  and  from  all  the  Aeons  proceeded  the  Aeon 
Jemis  (Smt^p),  by  whom  the  universe  was  to  be  properly  formed  and  re- 
deemed.   It  was  by  this  Jesus  that  the  Demiurge  was  unconsciously  inspired, 
80  as  gradually  to  form  the  world  according  to  the  type  of  the  divine  Plero- 
ma.   Hence  the  Demiurge  was  often  astonished  at  his  own  work,  and  his 
oreatnree  shrunk  from  and  adored  those  very  things  which  the  higher  spirit 
created  in  them.    For  although  heathenism  was  the  kingdom  of  matter  and 
Judaism  of  the  Demiurge,  individuals  were  raised  up  by  the  Soter  in  both, 
who,  under  the  excitement  of  divine  powers,  and  but  half  understood  by 
themselves  or  their  age,  pointed  forward  to  the  future.    Conscious  of  the  un- 
satisfactory nature  of  his  present  system,  the  Deminrge,  under  the  impression 
that  he  was  himself  the  supreme  Deity,  and  under  the  influence  of  an  obscure 
presentiment,  promised  his  beloved  people  that  he  would  send  them  a  Messiah. 
This  Messiah  he  furnished,  according  to  his  ability,  with  psychical  powers. 
At  the  baptism  of  this  Messiah,  the  Soter  became  united  with  him.    Miracles 
and  prophecies  were  needful  to  induce  psychical  men  to  confide  in  the  psychi- 
cal Messiah,  but  the  simple  power  of  truth  was  sufficient  to  collect  all  men 
of  a  pneumatic  nature  around  the  true  Saviour.    The  end  of  the  world  is  to 
be  a  still  higher  restoration  (airo/caraoracrtr))  ^or  then  the  Soter  will  introduce 
the  Achamoth  as  his  bride,  together  with  all  pneumatic  Ohristians,  into  the 
Fleroma,  the  Demiurge,  in  peace  and  joy  as  the  friend  of  the  bridegroom, 
will  rule  in  the  midst  of  all  psychical  Ohristians  on  the  confines  of  the  Fle- 
roma, and  all  matter  will  return  to  its  original  nothingness.    The  Valentinian 
was  the  most  influential  of  all  the  Gnostic  parties,  and  with  various  modifica- 
tions, continued  in  existence,  especially  in  Rome,  until  some  time  in  the 
fourth  century,  (d)    It  is  said  that  the  school  of  Ftolemaeus,  (e)  a  flourishing 
branch  of  the  same  party,  represented  the  Aeons,  which  Valentine  had  in 
fitct  only  described  as  the  forms  by  which  the  Deity  was  developed,  more 
definitely  as  real  persons.  (/)    In  his  epistle  to  Flora,  (jf)  (of  whose  unity  and 
Gnostic  genuineness  we  need  not  yet  despair),  (h)  he  attempts  to  vindicate 
the  creation,  and  the  Testament  of  the  Demiurge,  who  is  regarded  as  a  be- 
ing of  mere  justice,  from  either  of  the  extremes  by  which  they  had  been  as- 
cribed to  the  supreme  God  or  to  the  Devil.    "With  an  evident  attempt  to 
bring  his  views  into  nearer  correspondence  with  the  Catholic  system,  he  ac- 
cordingly finds  in  this  fact  a  reason  for  a  partial  abolition  and  a  partial  pre- 


*     "     V 

d)  They  are  the  principal  subject  of  Irenaena.  Some  particalars  may  be  found  in  Clement  Ta^ 
tul  adv.  Valentinianoa.    Epiph.  haer.  81.    MUnter,  Odae  gnosUcae,  thebalce  et  laL  Hafta.  1812. 

«)  fren.  praef.  ad  lib.  I.  j  2.     /)  Tertul.  adv.  VaL  c  4.      g)  Commonlcated  by  Epiph,  baur.  88. 

A)  A.  Stiertn^  de  Ptolemael  ad  Floram  ep.  P.  L  Jen.  1848.  On  the  other  hand,  in  apology :  K 
Romd,  in  tb«  Append,  to  the  9d  roL  of  the  2d  edit  of  Neand«^  Hist  of  the  Chr.  BeL 


80  ANCIENT  CHUBCH  HI8T0BY.    FEB.  L    DIT.  IL    A.  D.  10(^811 

serration  of  the  Mosaic  law  in  consequence  of  its  fulfilment  by  Christ 
8)  The  Ophites^  whose  origin  may  perhaps  be  discovered  in  a  Jewish  sect 
living  in  Egypt  before  the  time  of  Christ,  professed  to  believe  that  the  Son 
of  man  was  an  emanation  from  the  Original  Source  of  all  existence,  and  that 
from  both  of  these  proceeded  the  Mother  of  life  (nvfifia  &yiov).  This  being 
having  espoused  the  former  original  type  of  mankind,  gave  birth  to  Sophia 
and  Christ,  i.  e.  the  principle  of  Creation  and  of  Redemption.  When  Sophia, 
the  imperfect,  adventitious  of&pring  of  this  connection,  aspired  to  be  like 
God,  she  was  hurled  into  the  great  abyss,  and  there  gave  birth  to  Jaldabaoth, 
i,  e,  the  Son  of  Chaos,  (i)  the  Creator  of  the  world  and  the  God  of  the  Jews. 
With  the  assistance  of  his  planetary  spirits,  the  latter  now  made,  after  his 
own  image,  man,  whom  he  indued  with  life  and  invested  with  authority  to 
rule  over  divine  things  in  his  spirit  But  by  this  very  act  he  had  divested 
himself  of  hb  most  important  power,  and  soon  saw  with  dismay  that  his 
creature  had  become  superior  to  himself.  To  prevent  man  at  least  from  at- 
taining the  consciousness  of  divinity,  he  commanded  the  latter  not  to  eat  of 
the  tree  of  knowledge,  and  then,  filled  with  wrath,  threw  himself  into  the 
abyss,  where  he  produced  another  image,  the  Serpent-Spirit  {d<f>i6fiop<l}os)» 
But  Sophia,  now  delivered  from  her  faUen  state  in  consequence  of  the  birth 
of  the  Creator,  sought  once  more  to  attract  to  herself  and  to  purify  the  spirit- 
ual power  in  the  world.  She  availed  herself  of  the  enmity  of  the  Serpent- 
Spirit  against  its  parent,  to  induce  man  to  transgress  the  commandment 
which  had  been  given  him.  According  to  this,  what  is  related  in  the  Jewish 
books  as  a  Fall,  was  in  fact  a  transition  to  a  higher  mental  state.  In  great 
wratli  the  Creator  now  threw  men  down  to  the  lowest  material  world,  and 
harassed  them  with  all  the  temptations  and  pains  incident  to  matter.  Indi- 
vidual persons  endowed  with  high  intellectual  powers,  are  raised  up  by  So- 
phia, but  she  struggles  in  vain  to  break  the  bonds  which  confine  men,  until 
the  Aeon  Christ  unites  himself  with  the  psychical  Messiah,  and  in  conse- 
quence of  the  Creator's  enmity,  was  crucified.  Finally,  Sophia,  with  all  her 
spiritual  followers  among  men,  will  be  received  back  into  the  Pleroma,  and 
the  God  of  the  Jews,  gradually  deprived  of  all  his  spiritual  powers,  will  be 
swallowed  up  in  the  empty  abyss  of  matter.  The  Serpent,  who  had  been 
the  means  of  man's  first  exaltation  and  therefore  had  been  cursed  by  the 
Creator,  was,  in  accordance  with  his  two  natures,  both  honored  and  feared. 
One  Ophitic  party  went  so  far  in  their  hostility  to  the  Jews,  that  they  paid 
honor  to  the  most  abandoned  characters  mentioned  in  sacred  history  as  their 
highest  examples,  and  were  therefore  called  Cainites,  Others,  on  account 
of  their  disapprobation  of  such  extravagance,  were  called  Sethites.  The  pe- 
nal code  of  Justinian  shows  that  the  Ophites  were  not  extinct  even  in  the 
sixth  century,  (i) 

4)  Carpoerates  and  his  son  Bpiphanes,  Platonists  of  Alexandria  and  con- 
temporaries with  Valentine,  described  the  Primal  Being  as  the  great  Unity 
{Movds)  toward  which  all  finite  things  are  striving  to  return.     But  the 

k)  Iren.  1, 80.    Orig.  c  Cels.  YI,  Mas.    FpipK  hMr.  ffl.—MMMm,  Oeflch.  d  Sehlangenlinider. 
(Yen.  e.  uopMib.  KetMrgwch.  Helmst  1748. 1748. 4)  O.  R.  F,  JhOdnm',  de  Ophltlfli  Bint  1881 4 


CHAP.it.    DOCTRHfES.    |  7a  VALENTIN! AKS.    |7».  MARCION.  81 

eftrthly  spirits  (ayyfXoi  Koa-fionotoi)  who  have  fallen  away  from  this  unity 
are  continually  obstructing  this  effort  by  religious  enactments,  the  most  per- 
feet  specimen  of  which  is  the  Jewish  law.  A  few  wise  men  like  Plato  and 
Pythagoras,  by  means  of  some  reminiscences  of  a  lost  state  of  blessedness, 
have  sunk  back  into  the  divine  unity.  The  same  was  true  of  Jesus,  who 
overthrew  the  Jewish  law.  His  image  was  therefore  honored  by  the  side  of 
the  statues  of  other  great  sages,  in  the  temple  of  the  deified  youth  Epiphanes, 
in  the  island  of  Cephalonia.  The  justification  advocated  by  Oarpocrates  is 
not  to  be  attained  by  works,  but  by  love  and  faith,  i.  e.  by  a  complete  sur- 
render to  the  attraction  of  the  great  Unity,  in  the  presence  of  which  aU 
self-interest,  and  even  all  separate  existence  must  disappear.  In  this  state 
the  mind  is  exalted  above  all  need  of  precepts  or  moral  rules.  (Q 

§  79.    IV.  Gnostics^  in  an  especial  sense^  Christian, 

1)  Tr€n,  I,  27.  TeriuL  adr.  Mareloa.  L  V.  ^idXoyos  irtpX  rrtt  fit  bthv  hp^s  irfffTfwf, 
(4Ui  cent)  ed.  WfUUn.  Ba&  1674.  4  &  Orlg.  0pp.  Th.  L  p.  SOSss.  EpipK  baer.  42.  Emig.  (ftth  cent) 
Dant  d.  marc  SysL  A.  d.  Armen.  ▼.  Keumann.  (Zeltochr.  f.  hist  Theol.  lS84w  vol.  IV.  Sect  1.)— 
A.  Bahn^  Antfthesea  Harcionl.<s  Hber  deperdltas,  qnoad  fieri  potnit  restltatos.  Reglom.  182a— ZTaAn, 
d«  gDod  llardonls  antinomL  Regiom.  1880a.  2  P.  4  Rhode,  Prolegg.  ad.  quaest  de  £v.  Apostoloqne 
>iarc  denao  inaUtnendam.  Vrat  1884.  P.  L 

2)  /rm.  I,  28.  Clem.  Strom.  IIL  p^  547s.  558.  EpipK  baer.  4«. 

8)  Eumib.  IL  ccc  IV»  80.  Praep.  Ev.  VI,  10.  EpipK  ha«jr.  tA,—Augtutin.  baer.  85.— i*!  Strunz, 
nbL  Bard,  et  Bardeaaniatar.  Vlt  1710.  4  I/ahn^  Bard,  gnosdcua  Byroram  primus  bymnologna.  LpA. 
1819.  C.  Kuehner,  Bard,  numina  astralia.  Hildborgh.  1S88. 

1)  Mareion  made  his  appearance  at  Rome  as  early  as  before  139,  (a)  filled 
with  exalted  views  of  the  glory  of  Christianity,  and  fresh  from  a  contest 
with  the  remnants  of  Judaism  in  the  churches  of  Asia  Minor.  He  had  been 
excommunicated  (h)  by  his  own  father,  the  bishop  of  Sinope,  perhaps  in  con- 
sequence of  the  conflict  of  his  youthful  passion  with  an  inexorable  ecclesias- 
tical discipline.  He  availed  himself  of  a  connection  with  Oerdo,  a  Syrian 
Gnostic^  to  form  a  theoretical  system,  in  which  a  strong  contrast  was  pre- 
sented between  the  law  and  the  gospel,  and  between  the  period  before,  and 
that  after  Christ.  He  made  a  distinction  between  three  great  powers  (apxat), 
viz.,  the  holy  original  Being  (3ros  dyaHos),  the  righteous  Creator  (drjfiiovpyos 
dijcacof),  and  the  material  world  (vKr/)  with  its  wicked  ruler  (7roi^/>dr,  dcdjSoXor.) 
The  celestial  relations  of  these  principles  to  each  other  were  not  carried  out 
in  his  theory.  With  the  limited  power  in  his  possession,  the  Demiurge 
created  a  world  like  himself,  and  from  its  inhabitants  the  Jewish  nation  were 
selected  as  the  objects  of  his  peculiar  favor.  To  them  he  gave  a  law,  by 
which  Justification  was  to  be  obtained  by  works  alone,  and  in  connection  with 
them  maintained  an  impotent  struggle  with  the  empire  of  evil.  Prompted 
by  infinite  love  to  man  the  good  God  then  had  compassion,  and  by  the  spirit- 
ual manifestation  of  Christ  revealed  his  own  nature,  which  had  before  been 
entirely  concealed.    All  this  occurred  on  a  sudden,  and  with  no  preparation. 

0  CUrrK  Stroa  "*^  p.  511s«.  /r«k  I,  25.  Euseb.  II.  ecc  IV,  l.—OewnUuty  de  Inscrlptione  Phoc* 
aido-Graeca  in  Cyrew^lca  nnper  reperta  ad  Carpocratianomm  haeresin  portincnte.  Ilal.  1825.  4  As 
to  tbeir  spnriousness  comp.  Kopp.  Ep.  criL  (Stad.  u.  KrlL  1883.  P.  2.)  Gesenim  In  d.  Hall.  L.  Z.  1885. 
pk  4ISi.—FtUdn^^  do  Carpocratianla.  (lUgensS  Denk-scbr.  d.  bist  tbcol.  Oescllficb.  Lpa.  1824  p.  180ea.) 

a)  Jiut  ApoL  I.  a  U,    h)  EpipK  baer.  42.  28. 

6 


82  AXCIENT  CnURCn  HISTOKT.    per.  L    DIV.  IL    a.  D.  100-812. 

Those  who  believe  in  Christy  and  from  a  voluntary  love  to  God  live  a  holy  life, 
shall  receive  perfect  blessedness  in  his  celestial  kingdom,  while  all  others  be- 
long to  the  kingdom  of  the  Demiurge,  and  by  his  righteous  sentence,  accord- 
ing to  their  works,  shall  find  a  limited  degree  of  blessedness  or  perdition. 
That  the  ages  before  might  be  placed  on  an  equal  footing  with  those  after 
Christ,  our  Lord  was  supposed,  during  his  sojourn  in  the  world  of  the  dead, 
to  have  offered  salvation  to  the  heathen  and  to  all  who  had  been  lost  under 
the  Old  Testament,  on  condition  that  they  would  believe  on  him ;  while  all 
the  truly  pious  of  the  ancient  dispensation,  like  the  people  of  that  nation  on 
earth,  were  so  habituated  to  the  administration  of  the  Demiurge,  that  they 
were  kept  back  from  faith  in  him.  (e)  Marcion  thought  he  found  evidence 
of  the  character  of  the  Creator  from  the  condition  of  the  world,  from  the 
sensuous  nature  of  the  whole  representation  given  of  Jehovah  in  the  Old 
Testament,  and  from  the  obvious  distinction  between  the  real  Christ  and  the 
Mcasiah  held  forth  in  prophecy.  He  professed  to  form  his  scheme  of  Chris- 
tianity upon  a  literal  interpretation  of  the  sacred  Scriptures,  and  he  would 
acknowledge  nothing  as  Scripture  except  a  collection  of  the  epistles  of  Paul 
(6  dirofrrdXoi)  and  a  gospel  of  our  Lord  similar  to  that  of  Luke.  Ecclesiasti- 
cal tradition  since  the  time  of  IrenaeuB,  accuses  Marcion  of  having  expunged 
from  his  text  of  even  these  sacred  writings  whatever  was  supposed  to  be 
inconsistent  with  his  theological  views,  (d)  but  on  the  other  hand  it  concedes 
that  he  suffered  enough  to  remain  to  render  those  Scriptures  irreconcilable 
with  his  system,  without  the  most  violent  process  of  interpretation.  The 
question  therefore  has  necessarily  been  raised,  whether  he  did  not  use  an  older 
gospel  tlian  any  which  we  now  have,  and  one  of  which  Luke's  is  only  a  re- 
vision ?  (e)  It  must  however  be  confessed  that  the  authorities  in  favor  of  the 
superior  originality  of  Marcion^s  gospel  are  as  yet,  when  taken  in  detail,  of 
very  doubtful  validity,  and  that  those  ecclesiastical  fathers  who  assert  that 
he,  in  like  manner,  corrupted  the  epistles  of  Paul,  (/)  in  forming  such  an  opinion 
must  certainly  have  had  the  authentic  documents  before  them.  Besides,  if 
Marcion  in  his  extravagant  view  of  the  dissension  at  Antioch  (Gal.  2,  lias.) 
could  look  upon  the  other  apostles  as  Jewish  perverters  of  the  gospel  of 
Christ,  he  may  have  felt  justified  by  omissions,  or  by  explanations,  in  Chris- 
tianizing, according  to  his  view  of  the  phrase,  every  gospel  belonging  to  the 
Scriptures,  inasmuch  as  no  documents  in  the  possession  of  the  Apostolio 
Church,  without  some  alteration,  would  correspond  with  his  ultra-Panline 
notions.  His  ethical  doctrines  constituted  a  vigorous  system  of  asceticism 
which  he  enforced  by  his  own  example,  and  if  any  one  felt  unable  to  comply 
with  its  requisitions,  the  alternative  was  to  remain  a  catechumen,  (g)    He 


c)  Trtn.  I,  27.  8. 

d)  A.  Tfahn,  d.  £v.  Marc  In  8.  unpr.  GestalL  Kunlgsb.  1828.  {lldlo.  God.  apocr.  Th.  I.  p.  4018&) 
E^u»d.  de  canone  Mare.  lb.  1824 — CK  K  Becker^  Examen  crlt  de  rSvaog.  de  Maro.  Strasb.  1887. 
P.  L  4. 

«)  Rit^H'JiI,  d.  £y.  Marc  u.  d.  kan.  Ev.  des  Lac.  TQb.  184«.  Baur  in  Zellers  tbeoL  Jahrb.  184&  P.  4 

/)  On  the  utber  band :  Llijler^  Marcfonem  PauU  Epp.  et  Lucae  Ev.  adalterasse  dabitainr.  Tn^  et 

Yiadr.  17^  (CommtL  theol  ed.  VeUhuaen  Ac  Th.  I.  p.  ISOas,)  ScAriling^  do  Marc  Paullnaram  Epp. 

emendatore.  Tub.  1795.  4    Against  Tertnllian^s  aasertlon  that  Marcion  omitted  tbe  chief  doctrine*  in 

Col  1, 15-17.  we  certainly  have  no  other  alternative  than  to  soppoee  that  that  fktber  invented  them. 

g)  JIi9r.  ad  Gal.  8,  8.  Epiph.  42,  4  Comp.  Tertuk  de  praescr.  41. 


CHAP.  IV.    DOCTRINES.    %  T9.  TATIAN,  BABDESANES.    %  SO,  CLEMENTINES.    83 

rejected  all  mysteries,  and  allowed  women  to  administer  baptism.  Ilis  life 
was  spent  in  efforts  to  establish  a  congregation  of  those  whom  he  was  accns- 
tomed  to  call  his  companions  in  hatred  and  in  persecution.  The  Marcionites 
continaed  as  an  ecclesiastically  organized  party  until  some  time  in  the  sixth 
centnry.  Many  divisions  however  existed  among  them,  since  the  speculadve 
tenets  which  he  left  in  an  incomplete  form  were  perfected  in  various  ways 
by  additions  from  the  different  Gnostic  systems,  and  many  among  the  Gnos- 
tics endeavored  to  get  nearer  to  the  Ohurch  by  joining  their  communion. 

2)  Tatian  also  seems  to  have  found  no  way  to  justify  his  gloomy  views 
of  the  world,  but  by  a  dualistio  theory.  His  Demiurge  Jehovah  had  obscure 
impressions  by  which  he  became  conscious  of  a  dependence  upon  the  ori^- 
nal  source  of  light.  He  gave  offence  to  his  brethren  of  the  Ohurch  by  main- 
taining that  Adam  must  have  been  finally  lost.  He  prescribed  a  system  of 
abstinence  as  the  best  means  of  disengaging  ourselves  trora  the  world,  after 
the  example  of  our  Saviour.  A  party  of  Encratites,  calling  itself  by  the 
name  of  Tatian,  or  by  that  of  his  pupil,  Severus,  existed  as  late  as  in  the 
fourth  century. 

8)  Bardeaanes  (Bar  daizon),  who  resided  at  Edessa  (about  170),  would 
seem  from  his  place  of  residence,  as  well  as  from  some  of  his  Gnostic  formu- 
lae, which  strongly  remind  us  of  Valentine,  to  have  properly  belonged  to  the 
number  of  the  Syrian  Gnostics.  But  the  story  of  his  change  of  faith  at  an 
earlier  or  later  period  is  not  as  well  authenticated  as  the  general  opinion  that 
he  was  not  prevented  by  his  Gnosticism  from  denouncing  in  a  very  practical 
manner  certain  extravagances  of  the  Gnostic  schools,  from  asserting  man's 
internal  freedom  in  opposition  to  all  necessary  control  of  fate,  (A)  and  from 
being  a  strenuous  defender  of  Christianity,  and  a  distinguished  instructor  of 
the  Syrian  Churches. 

§  80.    V.  Judaizing  Gnostics,     Comp.  §  85.  75. 

Credne^\  (L  Eesicr  n.  Eblonltcn.  (Wlncre  Zeitachr.  f.  wlaa.  Theol.  1827.  P.  2s.)  Idem.  <He  Ett.  d. 
Jadenchr.  (B«itrr.  z.  ElnL  In  d.  bibl.  Schrr.  Hal.  1S32.  Vol  I.  p.  20898.)  ScJinedtenburger,  Q.  e.  dber- 
•ehaen  Punkt  la  d.  L.  d.  Ebion.  v.  d.  Person  Josu.  (Tub.  Zeitschr.  1880.  P.  L  p.  114s8.)  Bnur^  d. 
EbioolUr.  orig.  et  doctr.  ad  EsRcnis  reiKtenda.  Tub.  1881.  4  Idem,  in  d.  T&b.  Zeitschr.  1881.  P.  4. 
1836.  P.  &  1S88.  P.  8.  &  cUr.  Qno&iA.  p.  SOOas.  Schliemann  ({  75.)  Comp.  Baur  In  Zcller'stbeol  Jabrb. 
18U.  P.  8.  Schicegler^  nachap.  Zeita.  vol.  I.  p.  86888.  [A.  BUgenfeld^  krit  Untcrs.  G.  d.  Evv.  Just  d. 
Oem.  nom.  n.  MardoDS.  Ualle.  1850.  a] 

In  the  Clementine  Homilies  an  attempt  is  made  to  reconcile  the  Ebionite 
form  of  Christianity  with  that  maintained  by  Paul,  by  showing  that  Judaism 
and  Christianity  were  essentially  alike.  These  Homilies  were  written  in  a 
lively  and  impressive  style,  and  profess  to  present  us  with  the  doctrinal 
and  polemical  discourses  of  the  apostle  Peter,  addressed  principally  to  Simon 
Magus,  but  interwoven  with  the  romantic  history  of  Clement,  the  ostensible 
author,  {a)  The  doctrine  inculcated  in  them  respecting  God,  is  rigidly  mono- 
tlieistic,  but  all  created  existences  are  developed  in  contrasted  forms,  which 

A)  UtpX  unapfitirris.    Fragments  in  Orelli^  de  &ta  Tnr.  1824.  p.  20286. 

a)  T3t  KXrifiiyria,  three  prologues  and  nineteen  (originally  twenty)  Ilomilfes.  In  CoUl^r.  P.  appc 
Th.  L  p.  097ia.  Comp.  D.  v.  Cdtln^  Clementina  in  Ersch.  o.  Gmbers  EncycL  YoL  XYIIL  p.  868iL 


84  ANCIENT  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  L    DIV.  IL    A.  D.  100-«12. 

however  arc  not  absolute,  and  in  tbcir  eartMj  state  are  related  as  male  and 
female  (crvCvylai.)  The  Original  Being  has  made  a  division  of  the  world,  and 
assigned  it  to  two  principles  which  proceeded  from  himself.  To  one  of  the^^e 
called  Satan,  he  has  committed  the  present  dispensation  of  things,  and  to 
Christ  (also  called  a-o<^id,  nv€vfia  &yiov,  vVis  SKoj))  the  fatare  beyond  it,  al- 
though Satan  even  now,  as  an  avenging  power,  advances  the  cause  of  good- 
ness, and  the  world  has  never  been  destitute  of  some  men  of  the  future  age. 
Moreover  Christ  became  incarnate  in  Adam,  and  revealed  the  primitive  re- 
ligion which  had  been  corrupted  by  Satan  through  the  woman.  To  restore 
it,  Christ,  whose  influence  pervades  all  human  affairs,  appears  again  in  the 
persons  of  the  patriarchs  and  Moses,  changing  merely  his  form  with  the 
name.  The  revelations  thus  given,  however,  were  much  obscured  by  the  Old 
Testament  prophets,  who  having  been  bom  of  women  (Matth.  11,  11.),  pro- 
claimed partial  error.  Once  more  Christ  appeared  in  the  person  of  Jesus,  to 
re-establish  the  primitive  religion  and  make  it  universal.  Of  course  the 
genuine  religion  of  Moses  which  had  been  perpetuated  as  an  esoteric  doc- 
trine, and  genuine  Christianity,  could  not  be  opposed  to  each  other.  To  es- 
cape from  the  power  of  Satan^s  kingdom,  men  must  live  an  ascetic  life,  and 
receive  from  the  earth  nothing  but  the  bare  necessaries  of  existence.  The 
use  of  flesh  and  wine  was  prohibited,  but  marriage  was  recommended.  The 
Homilies  were  composed  or  revised  about  the  middle  of  the  second  century, 
at  Rome,  with  the  view  of  reconciling  Jewish  Christianity,  then  declining  in 
that  city,  with  the  general  Church,  by  means  of  an  Essenic-Gnostic  theory, 
and  of  vindicating  that  form  of  Christianity,  not  only  from  the  Gnostic  ha- 
tred of  the  Jews,  but  from  the  prophetic  system  of  Montanism.  While  Peter 
is  exalted  as  the  true  apostle  to  the  Grentiles,  the  careful  silence  which  they 
maintain  with  respect  to  Paul,  renders  it  probable  that  in  the  person  of  Si- 
mon Magus,  not  only  Marcion  bat  Paul  himself  may  be  aimed  at  in  some  re- 
proaches which  would  admit  of  such  a  reference,  (b)  They  presuppose  the 
existence  of  a  sacerdotal  system,  of  a  chair  of  St.  Peter  at  Rome,  and  of  a 
patriarchate  of  James  at  Jerusalem.  The  adaptation  of  the  Homilies  to  the 
promotion  of  ecclesiastical  interests  probably  occasioned  a  revision  of  them, 
to  make  them  conform  to  the  views  of  the  Catholics,  and  to  meet  the  altera- 
tions which  the  heretics  were  supposed  to  have  previously  made  in  one  of 
the  sacred  books,  (c)  It  is  impossible  now  to  determine  whether  the  Homi- 
lies were  the  literary  composition  of  a  single  individual,  or  contain  an  expres- 
sion of  a  distinct  form  of  Ebionism  then  in  Rome.  But  the  Ebionites  whom 
Epiphanius  describes  (d)  as  existing  in  his  times,  with  their  synagogues  in  the 

h)  Horn.  XVn,  19.  II,  17.  Even  In  the  Epistle  of  Peter  prefixed  as  a  Prologue :  rtriy  rSov  awi 
idy&y  rh  8t*  4nov  ySfiifiow  ixtHoKlfiairay  K^ipvyfiOj  rod  ix^P^^  kvbp^rrov  avopiSy  riya  iral 
(f>\vap6liri  irpoffriKdfifyot  liiliacrKaXiay.  Bnt  in  opposition  to  this  reference  first  proposed  by 
Bsnr,  comp.  NUdner^  KOesch.  p.  242. 

o)  Preserved  in  the  Trans,  of  Rafinos:  EL  dementis  Recognitiones  {kvKyvJKrtit  of  the  first 
quarter  of  the  third  cent)  cd.  Colder.  Th.  L  p^  485s8.  R  O.  Gendorf,  Lps.  1S8S.  The  original  Title 
perhaps  also  of  the  Homilies  was  irep^oSoi  (ir/>a|eis)  Tltrpov  or  KAtj/icrror.  The  latest  revision 
and  compilation  of  the  psendo^Iementine  writings:  wtpl  rSov  irpd^twy  iiritriiunciy  re  rod  Uirpov 
iniTOfi^t  ed.  CcMer,  Th.  L  p.  749as.  d)  Hacr.  80.  comp^  19, 1. 


CHAP.  IT.    DOCTBINES.    1 80.  CLEMENTINES.    EBIONITES.  85 

ancient  abodes  of  the  Essenes,  and  in  Oyprns,  maintained  the  same  principles 
respecting  the  division  of  the  worlds  the  varioos  transmigrations  of  the  prin- 
ciple which  they  call  Christ,  with  the  semi-Gnostic  pecnliarity,  according  to 
which  this  principle  had  no  connection  with  the  son  of  Mary  and  Joseph 
until  his  baptism,  the  corruption  of  the  Old  Testament  by  a  series  of  spnrions 
propbetsi,  and  the  necessity  of  a  similar  asceticism.  Although  they  still  re- 
quired circnmcision  and  the  observance  of  the  Jewish  Sabbath,  while  the 
Homilies  demanded  only  baptism,  their  national  separation  does  not  neces- 
sarily imply  that  they  did  not  tolerate  Gentile  Ohristians,  and  even  the  Homi- 
lies allow  a  special  pre-eminence  to  circumcised  believers,  (e)  The  only  thing 
indicating  the  ancient  grudge  felt  by  Jewish  Christians,  appears  in  their  idle 
legend  respecting  Paul.  (/)  The  gospel  commonly  received  by  the  Ebionites 
was  used  both  among  them  and  in  the  Homilies,  and  many  things  indicate  that 
the  work  of  Clement,  with  regard  to  the  travels  of  Peter,  which  they  pos- 
aeesed,  was  of  a  kindred  origin  with  that  of  the  Homilies.  Epiphanius 
thought  that  this  phase  of  Ebionism,  which  he  looked  upon  as  best  exhibited 
in  the  persons  of  Ebion  and  Elzai,  originated  in  the  time  of  Tr^an,  from  a 
eombination  of  the  Ebionites  with  the  Elkesaites  and  Sampsaeans.  He  says 
the  Elkesaites  sprung  originally  from  a  branch  of  the  Essenes  (^OvarjuoC)^  and 
according  to  their  own  explanation,  their  name  was  given  them  because  they 
bctieved  that  the  divine  power  was  concealed  in  the  bodies  of  its  human  sub- 
jects, (g)  The  name  of  Sampsaeans  was  given  because  those  who  were  so 
caUed  turned  their  faces  in  prayer,  not  toward  Jerusalem,  but  toward  the 
rising  sun.  (h)  The  Elkesaites  are  mentioned  by  Origen  as  a  Jewish  sect, 
even  in  his  time,  (i)  The  ascetic  system  of  the  Ebionites,  taken  in  connection 
with  the  fact  that  they  believed  that  the  mission  of  Christ  was  merely  to 
abolish  the  sacrifices,  has  very  much  the  appearance  of  I^ssenism.  But  if  at 
an  early  period  they  extravagantiy  extolled  celibacy,  (k)  their  subsequent  en- 
oonragement  of  early  marriages  shows  that  those  views  of  life  which  ordina- 
rily previuled  among  the  Jews  had  finally  gained  the  ascendency  over  rigid 
Easeniam.  The  independent  position  however  which  the  latter  maintained 
with  respect  to  the  Old  Testament,  gave  it  a  much  better  prospect  of  con- 
Cinnance  as  a  Jewish  system,  than  that  which  ordinarily  was  received  among 
the  Jews. 

§  81.    YI.  Influence  of  Gn&sticUm  vpon  the  Church, 

It  was  principally  through  the  influence  of  the  Gnostics,  that  the  arts  and 
fioienees  were  introduced  into  the  Church,  that  the  Church  itself  became  con- 
scious of  its  true  character,  that  the  Jewish  clement  in  Christianity  was  re- 
pressed, and  that  its  vast  importance  in  the  affairs  of  the  world,  and  of  God^s 
kingdom,  became  appreciated.      It  is,  however,  difficult  to  estimate  their 

tf)  In  the  CorUMtatlo  prefixed.  (CotOsr.  Th.  L  p.  60&)  /)  Epiph,  b«er.  80,  IS. 

g)  Haer,  If,  2:  8td  rh  I^X.  (b*^!!  or  ^K)  KoXovff^ai  ivyafitw^  Sa2  (*^9?)  'f^fft^vfifi^yov. — 
R^dep^nning,  Q.  d.  Urspr.  d.  Elkeaftiten.  (Append.  1.  to  his  Origen.  Vol.  IL  {RiUchl^  in  Niedner*8 
Zeitaebrift  for  Bept  1808.] 

A)  Hfter.  08,8:  Sa/uif^aioi  ipfirivM^oyrai  'H\iaKol  (trom^TyO\ 
f)  In  Easeb.  H.  eo&  VI,  88.    k)  EpipK  baar.  80,  % 


86  ANCIENT  CHUKCH  HISTORY.    PEE.  L    DIV.  IL    A.  D.  100-«18. 

number  or  their  inflnence.  'We  do  not  often  find  evidence  that  in  any  par- 
ticular locality  their  number  was  suporiot  to  that  of  the  orthodox,  and  yet 
some  of  them  were  to  be  found  in  almost  every  place,  and  in  animation  and 
spirit  their  writers  excelled  those  of  the  Church.  The  minds  of  the  Greeks 
were  attracted  by  their  striking  opposition  to  Judaism,  the  intellect  of  all 
men  was  gratified  by  their  promise  of  a  dominion  over  matter  and  their  inde- 
pendent development  in  the  direction  of  a  perfect  knowledge,  the  fancy  was 
stimulated  by  the  boldness  of  their  heaven-storming  systems  and  by  the  op- 
portunity of  contributing  something  without  much  trouble  to  the  formation 
of  them,  and  even  the  Church  could  not  but  admire  the  contempt  which 
they  inculcated  for  the  world.  But  the  teachers  of  the  Catholic  Church  were 
impressed  with  the  conviction  that  it  was  essential  to  the  very  nature  of 
Christianity  that  it  should  be  a  religion  for  the  people,  that  all  true  religion 
was  something  more  than  a  speculation,  and  that  piety  itself  required  that 
the  revelation  which  God  had  made  in  Judaism  and  in  Christianity,  and  indeed 
in  all  human  history,  should  be  one  in  its  principles.  They  therefore  placed 
themselves  in  direct  hostility  to  the  exorbitant  pretensions  and  the  allure- 
ments of  the  Gnostics.  The  arbitrary  forms  which  the  fancies  of  the  Gnos- 
tics had  constructed,  could  not  long  resist  this  united  opposition,  especially 
when  the  additional  power  of  the  New  Platonists  was  brought  against  them. 
Even  in  the  third  century  Goosticism  had  lost  all  creative  energy,  in  the 
fourth  it  was  completely  powerless,  and  in  the  sixth  only  a  few  vestiges  of  it 
remained. 

§  82.    Manuhaeism, 

L  1)  An  accoantA  given  in  the  Greek  Church  refer  back  to:  Archelai  (Btokop  of  Cteear,  tAxfot 
27S.)  Acta  dispatationis  cam  Manete.  {Zacagni^  CoIL  monameDt  vet  Eccl.  gr.  et  lat  Bom.  1698.  4. 
and  Jfansl  Th.  L  p.  1129sa.)  The  Oriental  acconnta,  later  indeed,  bat  derived  from  OTiginal  ancient 
documents,  are  in :  Iferbeloi,  BIbL  oriental  Par.  169T.  t  art.  Man!  &  Sltv.  (U  Sncy^  Momolrea  snr  di- 
verses  antiquitea  de  la  Pene.  Par.  1798.  4.  p.  4280.  Fragments  of  Mani's  writings,  especially  £pist(*Ia 
fundamenti,  in :  Fdbricii  Bibl.  gr.  Th.  Y.  p.  2S4fls.  2)  Titus  BostrentU  (about  860),  Korii  Mavixaibfy. 
{Oanitii  Lection,  ed.  Basnag.  Th.  I.)  Epiph.  baer.  66.  Augustinus :  Contra  Epi  Manichaei.  C  Forta- 
natnm,  C.  Adimantom,  C.  Faustnm  L  88.  De  actts  c  Felice  Man.  1.  2.  De  nature  boni.  (Th.  TIIL)  De 
gen.  c.  Man.  De'morlb.  £cc  oath,  et  morih.  Man.  (Th.  L) 

II.  Beauwbre^  Hist  de  Manich6e  et  da  Manlch^isme.  Amst  ITSisa.  2  vols.  i.  A.  A.  Georgii  Al> 
phabetum  Thlbetannm.  Bom.  1762.  4.  Reichlin-Meldegg.  Tlieol.  d.  Manes.  Frk£  1825.  A.  V.  de  Weg^ 
nsm^  Manichaeor.  indulgentiae  c  brcvi  Manichaeismi  adumbrat  Lps.  1827.  GUttteter^  &.  Bcicblin> 
Moldegg,  Wegnem  de  Neonder.  (Stad.  u.  Krlt  182S.  P.  8.)  Baur,  d.  man.  BSyst  T&b.  1881.  (Compw 
Schncckenburger  in  d.  Stud.  n.  Krlt  ISSa  P.  &  and  ZlngerU  in  d.  Tab.  Quartalschr.  IMl.  p.  574bs.) 
F,  C.  Tr«eh»el^  IL  Eanon,  Kritik  u.  Exeg.  d.  Manich.  Bern.  1882. 

The  reli^ous  oonfiicts  which  took  place  on  the  confines  of  the  Eastern 
world  finally  gave  birth  to  Manichacism.  The  history  of  its  origin  is  founded 
upon  traditions  and  uncertain  documents.  On  the  re-establishment  of  the 
Persian  empire  (after  227)  under  the  Sassanides,  the  Magusaean  sect,  which 
had  defended  the  doctrine  of  absolute  Dualism,  and  various  foreign  systems 
were  driven  from  the  kingdom.  Mani^  a  Magian  of  this  sect,  having  dis- 
covered many  points  of  agreement  between  the  doctrines  of  Mithraism,  of  Bud- 
daism,  of  Gnostic  Christianity,  and  the  principles  of  his  own  paternal  faith, 
beheved  himself  called  to  combine  these  popular  religions,  especially  Parsism 
and  Christianity,  into  one  universal  religion.    He  presented  himself  before 


CHAP.  IT.    D0CTBINE8.    fSS- MANICHAEISM.  87 

the  Ghristiaiis  as  the  Paraclete  and  an  apostle  of  Christ.  Rejected  hy  them 
and  persecnted  hy  the  Magians,  he  is  said  to  have  heen  flayed  alive  under 
Baharam  (272-6). — Manichaeism,  as  it  existed  in  the  fourth  and  fifth  centu- 
ries, accounted  for  all  events  which  have  taken  place  in  the  world  on  dualistic 
principles.  God  in  his  kingdom  of  light,  and  the  Demon  with  his  kingdom 
of  darkness,  were  directly  opposed  to  each  other — good  and  evil  heing  in 
their  nature  identical  with  light  and  darkness.  After  long  internal  conflicts 
among  themselves,  the  different  powers  of  the  demoniac  kingdom  became 
united  in  their  opposition  to  the  kingdom  of  light.  The  primitive  man,  who 
was  the  first-bom  of  God,  and  who,  in  connection  with  the  four  pure  elements 
contended  for  the  kingdom  of  light,  was  overthrown,  and  was  afterwards  de- 
livered, but  a  portion  of  his  light  was  wrested  from  him  and  borne  down  to 
the  abodes  of  darkness.  God  then  brought  into  existence  through  the  agency 
of  the  Mother  of  life  ({av  nvtvfia^  the  present  universe,  tliat  it  might  be  a 
new  receptacle  of  this  lost  light.  The  vital  power  of  this  universe  is  the 
fight  retained  in  the  bonds  of  darkness.  Two  new  heavenly  powers,  Christ 
and  the  Holy  Ghost,  then  proceeded  from  Gbd,  that  they  might  redeem  it 
from  its  imprisonment.  The  first  is  the  Sun  and  Moon,  and  the  other  is  the 
Air,  which  attract  toward  themselves  all  the  powers  of  light  in  the  earth. 
To  retain  these  in  his  possession,  the  Demon  formed  man  after  the  image  of 
the  primitive  man,  combining  in  him  as  in  a  microcosm  the  clearest  light 
with  his  own  darkness.  From  him  descended  the  race  of  man,  into  whose 
souls  the  light  penetrated.  But  although  they  were  endowed  with  an  inhe- 
rent liberty  to  continue  as  they  were,  in  spite  of  the  necessity  of  evil  in  na- 
ture, they  soon  fell  under  the  temptations  of  matter  and  the  illusions  of  the 
Demon  (Judaism  and  Heathenism).  Christ  himself  then  appeared  on  earth, 
and  merely  endured  the  semblance  of  suffering,  and  is  regarded  in  this  system 
ts  the  type  of  all  imprisoned  light  (Jesus  passibilis).  By  his  doctrine  and  his 
attractive  power  he  commenced  the  process  of  liberating  the  light  from  its 
bondage,  but  even  the  apostles  misinterpreted  his  instructions  by  giving  them 
a  Jewish  sense.  The  Scriptures  possessed  by  the  Church  have  been  partially 
corrupted  by  the  Demon,  and  partially  composed  by  unknown  writers. 
Ifani  came  to  reveal  tlie  secret  relations  of  the  universe,  and  to  secure  the 
means  of  human  freedom.  Complete  truth  can  therefore  be  found  nowhere 
except  in  his  writings.  In  the  end  there  will  be  a  complete  separation  be- 
tween the  light  and  the  darkness,  when  the  powers  of  darkness  will  have  be- 
come conscious  of  their  inability  to  contend  with  the  light,  and  will  resume 
their  strife  with  each  other.  The  Manichacons  assumed  the  name  of  a  Church, 
whidi  possessed  a  hierarchical  form  of  government,  and  consisted  of  two 
great  classes.  The  first  was  composed  of  the  perfect  (electi,  perfecti),  who 
alone  possessed  a  knowledge  of  the  mysteries ;  and  the  second  was  made  up 
of  the  Catechumens  (auditores),  who  were  instructed  principally  in  mythical 
allegories  relating  to  the  philosophy  of  religion  and  of  nature,  and  were  al- 
lowed to  hope  for  pardon  for  their  participation  in  the  business  and  pleasures 
o(  life,  in  consequence  of  the  intercessions  of  the  perfect,  for  none  but  the 
perfect  undertook  the  duties  of  self-mortification  (signaculum  sinus,  oris  et 
nanuaX  ai^d  were  sustained  by  the  others  principally  on  olives.    Their  pecu- 


88  ANaENT  CBUSCB  DISTOBY.    PEK.  L    DIT.  IL    A.  D.  VM-nS. 

liar  views  of  nature  demanded  that  baptism  should  be  performed  in  ml,  aad 
in  some  oongregationB  they  gave  oooasion  to  an  abominable  mingling  of  tbs 
elements  in  the  Lord's  Sapper.  The  forms  of  worshi[>  praclised  ■■ 
Auditors  were  simple,  Sunday  wos  observed  as  a  day  of  fasting:,* 
anniTersary  of  Uani's  death  waa  celebrated  as  tbe  great  foatival  n' 
name  of  the  Feast  of  the  pnlpit  (/S^fo).  The  Manichaeiin^  were 
oreasing  in  nnmber  in  the  foorth  centnry,  and  were  then  sc^atlcn-d 
part  of  the  Oriental  world,  and  in  Africa,  Sicily,  and  Ituly.  Mam 
of  noble  minda  were  attracted  by  the  promise  which  tlieir  svsteiu  ) 
tliat  it  could  solve  all  mysteriea,  and  exalt  man  above  ilie  varloii 
which  then  distracted  the  world.  Even  then,  however,  th.y  v 
with  fira  and  sword  by  the  heathen  emperors,  on  the  grouttil  of  tlie* 
Porsian  sect.  For  this  reason,  as  well  aa  on  aocanot  of  tboir  debivM' 
oormpt  indifference,  by  a  pretended  exaltation  above  all  oiitvviti  d  tb 
sank  in  the  sixth  oentnry  beneatli  the  eqnal  hatred  of  the  Magiui 
bishops.  Still  we  find  some  vestiges  of  a  secret  and  solitary  Mt.. 
even  in  the  Uiddle  Ages. 

S  88.  HUIorko-Eedttlaitical  Thtotogy, 
The  ecclesiastical  lileratnro  of  the  second  centnry  wns  pi 
tional  character,  and  partly  con^tcd  of  conlrovcrsuil  writings  bj 
and  Gnostics.  Especially  in  the  conflicts  with  the  latter,  a  C 
gy  was  formed,  in  which  an  attempt  was  made  to  hold  f^t  tl 
sis  of  Christianity  as  the  common  property  of  all,  and  to  npprohet 
tiosl  relations  in  a  scientiflc  manner,  Hence  all  philosophy  v 
declined,  and  tme  Christianity  was  thought  to  consist  whuljj  in 
traditions  and  doonmenta,  and  those  obvions  tmths  whloli  en 
comprehended  by  the  people.  The  representatives  of  this  tendency  i 
Irenaeoa  and  TertulUon,  who  also  indolged  in  the  expectation  of  a  mOlannial 
kingdom  nigh  at  hand,  (a)  Irenaeia  was  a  disciple,  and  perhaps  also  a  oom- 
panion  of  Polycarp,  during  the  Journey  of  that  martyr  to  Home,  and  was  a 
bishop  of  Lyons  (177-202).  He  was  a  perspicnons,  jndicious,  and  philosopb- 
ioally  edooated  instructor,  with  youthful  recollections  reaching  baolf  to  apos- 
tolic times,  and  now  came  forward  as  tiie  opponent  of  the  Gnoetic  speonla- 
tions.  Ae  hia  writings  were  regarded  almost  in  the  light  of  foreign  prodoc- 
tions  in  the  country  where  he  resided,  they  soon  became  littie  known,  and 
were  at  an  early  period  lost,  (b)  The  only  literature  which  the  Latin  Chnrch 
possessed,  oonusted  entirely  of  translations,  until  the  appearauoe  of  Qaintns 
Scptimins  Florens  TtrtvUianvt,  lie  was  at  first  a  heathen  rhetorician,  and 
an  advocate  in  Rome  (abont  190),  but  afterwards  a  presbyter  in  Carthage, 
his  native  city  (d.  220),  His  character  waa  severe,  gloomy  and  fiery,  but  by 
great  exertions  he  achieved  for  Christianity,  In  the  Panic-Latin  dialect,  a 
literature  in  which  an  animated  rhetoric,  a  sonnd  and  vivid  conception  of  tha 

a)  Im  V.  as.     Ten^l.  idj.  Mtro.  Ill,  S8. 

I)  Wltb  thi  i-Kvpllon  of  ■  rew  spiitlH  ud  fri(iDCPh  notlibig  mnMlm  bnl  bli  D  bonti  ■■■littt 
Uu  On»U«,  (Xi-rx"!  «<■'  i'aTpawii  ttii  ^tnSariiioa  yviatui,  \a  u  old  Lulu  tnuulttloii.  tb* 
t«  Book  ud  ■  ttv  ftagmcnii  In  the  otlglDil.  0pp.  ad.  ffmKA  Oiod.  1T01.  tla—utl,  P«r.  ITIA  Vn. 


CHAP.  lY.    DOCTBnr£&    i  68.  TERTULUANUS.    i  81  CYPBIANUa  89 

Idoal,  profbimd  feelings,  and  legal  intelligence  contended  for  the  snpremaoj. 
He  placed  a  high  estimate  upon  that  consciousness  of  God  which  he  contend- 
ed might  be  found  in  the  depths  of  every  soul,  but  he  was  fond  of  contrasting 
with  proud  irony  the  foolishness  of  the  gospel  with  the  worldly  wisdom  of 
his  ccmtemporaries,  and  the  incredibility  of  the  divine  miracles  with  the  or- 
dinary understanding  of  the  world,  (c)  His  writings  are  partly  controver- 
flial,  and  in  these  he  exhibits  the  utmost  confidence  in  the  catholic  views,  in 
<^yposition  to  those  of  Pagans,  Jews,  and  Heretics,  and  partly  devotional. 
They  are,  however,  so  written,  that  the  devotional  element  constantly  ap- 
pears in  the  former,  and  the  polemic  in  the  latter,  in  behalf  of  a  strict  mord- 
itj  and  discipline,  (d)  The  Montanistic  views  are  perceptible  in  them  all, 
but  they  become  prominent  and  hostile  to  the  Romish  Church  in  proportion 
to  the  degree  in  which  the  latter  withdrew  its  countenance  from  Montanism, 
for  the  Roman  Church,  rather  than  Tertullian,  experienced  a  change  of  sen- 
timent on  that  subject,  (e)  And  yet  the  western  portion  of  the  Church  con- 
tinned  so  tolerant  toward  Montanism,  that  some  female  martyrs  adhering  to 
that  system  in  the  African  Church  have  always  continued  to  be  acknowledged 
as  saints,  (/)  and  Tertullian  finally  became  so  prominent,  that  he  is  regarded 
AS  the  actual  type  of  the  Latin  theology.  That  theology  was  then  dbindined 
to  any  philosophical  theories  respecting  divine  things,  and  was  entirely  occu- 
pied with  questions  relating  to  the  condition  of  the  Church,  and  matters  in- 
dispensable to  salvation. 

§  84.  Thtueius  Caecilianvs  Cyprianua, 

L  Opp.  Cipriani  ed  RlgaHitu.  Pftr.  1S4&  t  FeU.  Oxt  1692.  C  ed.  8.  addlUe  »ant  Das.  Cjpr. 
J>94wlH,  (Oz£  1684.)  Amst  1700.  f.  Baloz.  Par.  1726.  t  Goldhom.  Lpa.  1888&  2  P.  YIU  Cypr.  per 
^gmiium^  ejas  Di*ooDiim  (Cypr.  0pp.)  Among  the  aetli  xnartTril  the  two  older  bot^nnlng,  Cma 
Cjf€.  and  Imper.  Yaleriana— IL  Pearwn^  Annales  CyprfanicI  before  Fell's  edit  IT.  F.  ScAmiedm', 
IL  Qypr.  Behr.  ▼.  d.  Elnb.  d.  Klrohe.  Lpii  1822.  F.  W.  ReUberg^  Cypr.  nacb  i.  Leben  n.  Wlrkeo. 
G«tt.l88L 

The  Church  of  his  times  is  well  represented  in  the  life  of  Cyprian.  Hav- 
ing enjoyed  as  a  rhetorician,  and  perhaps  also  as  an  advocate  in  Carthage,  all 
the  pleasures  of  heathenism,  he  became  impressed  with  a  consciousness  of  the 
vanity  of  his  life,  and  sought  deliverance  in  the  Church  (246).  Although,  in 
the  excitement  of  a  new  birth  by  baptism,  he  had  sold  his  possessions,  and 
distribnted  them  among  the  poor,  a  sufficient  amount  of  real  estate  and  reve- 


1781  2  P.  f  I*  IIL  c  1-4.  In  graecnm  term,  restituta  \na  H.  G.  J.  Thiersch.  (Stud.  n.  Krlt  1842. 
P.  2.)  Iren.  fVa|rmin.  anecdota  ed.  C.  M.  P/aff,  Hag.  Com.  1716.  (Bynt  d«.  Btnttg.  172a)  Oomp. 
gua«^.  IL  eec  V,  4aL  20.  26.-/7:  Dodwell,  Das.  In  Ir.  Ox.  1689.  Mawuet,  Dss.  praeviae  In  Ir.  Ubroa. 
A.  SUeren,  de  Ir.  adr.  baereMS  operto  fontlbua,  Indole,  doctr.  et  dignltate.  Oott  1S36.  4.  Idem,  Iren. 
fa  Ersch.  u.  Oniber'k  EncycL  p.  IL  vol.  XXIIL    J.  M.  Prat,  Hist  de  8.  Iren^e.  Lyon  et  Par.  1848. 

e)  Apologet  c  17.  De  poenitent  c.  1.  De  vlrgg.  yel  c.  1.  Do  resurr.  c  8.  C.  Mara  I,  10b.— Do 
came  Cb.  e.  S.  De  praeacript  c.  7.  Adv.  Hermog.  o.  8. 

tf)  Opp.  ed.  RiffolUwi.  Par.  (1685. 1641.)  1664.  t  Semler  et  SchlUi.  Hal  1770s«.  6  Tb.  Leopold, 
Lpc  1889^  4  P.— il.  Neander,  AntignoaUcaa,  Qelst  dea  Tert  a.  ElnL  In  dess.  Scbrr.  BerL  1820. 
(Han.  L.  Zw  1S2S.  N.  271m.)    [Antlgnoatloua,  ibd.  tranal.  by  J.  E.  Ryland.  Lond.  1851.  vol  II,  8.] 

«)  Tertul  adv.  Prazean.  a  1.  De  vligg.  vel.  c.  Ifc  De  pndio.  a  1.  Comp.  Hieron.  cataL  c  68.— i^ 
G.  a^ant^  TertoL  omnia  in  roonUnlsmo  acrlpta  vlderL  Ylt  1788w  4  J.  A.  IfdauU^  <1«  ▼«»  aetato 
•eriptur.  Tert  Hal.  (1757.)  1768.  (Opp.  Fase.  IIL  Hal.  1S17  ) 

/)  VaUtiuB,  AcU  BS.  Perpetnae  et  FeUclt  Par.  1664. 


90  ANCIENT  CUUECn  HISTORY.    PEE.  L    DIV.  IL    A.  IX    10(^812. 

nnes  remained  in  his  possession  to  enable  him  to  perform  splendid  acts  of  be- 
neficence in  the  accomplishment  of  his  plans.    He  enjoyed  the  instmctioiifl, 
bnt  his  heart  never  became  imbned  with  the  profound  sentiments  of  Tertol- 
lian,  and  his  zeal  was  wholly  expended  in  the  administration  of  the  affairs 
of  the  Church.    All  his  writings  were  drawn  forth  by  passing  events,  and 
by  their  simple  and  ardent  eloquence  they  exerted  a  considerable  influence 
on  those  events.    The  leading  thought  in  all  his  writings  is,  that  the  Church, 
being  one  in  Christ,  should  be  governed  as  a  single  kingdom  by  the  bishops 
appointed  by  Christ.    He  refused  the  bishopric  of  Carthage  to  which  he  had 
been  elected,  until,  in  spite  of  an  opposing  party  of  presbyters,  he  recognized 
in  the  tumultuous  expressions  of  the  popular  will  the  mandate  of  God  (248). 
His  plans  for  the  enforcement  of  ecclesiastical  discipline  were  suddenly  inter- 
rupted by  the  persecution  under  Decius.    He  fled  (250),  but  from  his  place 
of  refuge  he  continued  arbitrarily  to  govern  his  church  by  means  of  rescripts 
and  vicars,  and  apologized  for  the  little  attention  he  paid  to  the  counsel  of 
his  co-presbyters  and  the  will  of  the  people,  by  referring  to  the  necessitieB 
of  the  times.    A  great  multitude  of  those  who  had  fallen  in  time  of  persecu- 
tion  afterwards  begged  that  they  might  be  readmitted  to  the  Church. 
Cyprian  at  first  refused  to  do  this  with  extreme  Montanistio  severity.    But 
the  power  of  pardon  in  such  cases  was  generally  conceded  to  the  confessors, 
who  in  the  present  instance  exercised  it  without  regard  to  his  views.    A 
power  thus  abused  he  refused  to  acknowledge.    The  hostile  presbyters,  led 
on  by  Felicissimui^  whom  they  had  ordained  a  deacon,  now  stirred  up  the 
offended  confessors  and  those  who  had  formerly  relapsed,  until  an  insurrec- 
tion against  his  authority  was  efiected.    They  represented  that  it  ill  became 
one  who  had  himself  fled  like  a  hireling,  to  exalt  himself  above  those  who,  in 
times  of  persecution,  had  exhibited  some  signs  of  human  infirmity,  and  least 
of  all  those  who  had  then  heroically  maintained  their  constancy.    They  de- 
posed Cyprian,  and  chose  Fortunatus,  one  of  their  own  number,  in  his  place. 
Cyprian  apologized  for  his  flight,  by  pleading  that  he  was  led  to  it  by  a  divine 
revelation,  and  declared  that  every  one  who  resisted  his  authority  was  a 
rebel  against  Christ.     After  Easter,  in  the  year  251,  he  returned  to  his 
charge,  and  at  a  synod  of  the  African  bishops  represented  his  own  cause  as 
the  common  cause  of  the  episcopacy.    With  this  view,  the  synod  put  down 
the  opposition  of  the  presbyters.    With  respect  to  those  who  had  relapsed, 
he  obtained  a  moderate  decision,  which  ei\joined  that  they  should  not  be 
given  over  to  despair,  nor  admitted  to  pardon,  except  in  immediate  danger 
of  death,  or  after  a  long  and  thorough  repentance.    Accordingly,  when  a 
pestilence  was  prevalent,  and  during  the  incursions  of  the  barbarians,  he 
freely  administered  to  them  consolation  and  assistance.    The  intimate  con- 
nection which  he  had  ordinarily  maintained  with  the  Roman  Church,  and 
which  had  been  strengthened  by  a  common  interest  in  opposition  to  the  No- 
vatians,  was  interrupted  (after  253)  by  the  controversy  respecting  the  bap- 
tism of  heretics.    In  opposition  to  the  Roman  bishop,  Cyprian  contended, 
that  truth  was  to  be  ascertained,  not  by  an  appeal  to  usage,  but  to  reason ; 
that  each  bishop  was  equal  in  authority  to  every  other ;  that  the  laws  of  no 
province  were  a  uniform  model  for  those  of  another,  and  that  a  diversity  of 


CHAP.  lY.    DOCTBINES.    {84  CTPBIANUa    $85.  CLEMENS  ALEX.  91 

usages  was  not  inconsistent  with  the  general  unity  of  the  Church.  Stephen 
refused  to  receive  the  African  messengers  whom  he  sent  to  Home.  Cyprian 
appealed  to  the  Asiatic  bishops,  in  whose  name  Firmilian^  bishop  of  Caesa- 
rea,  wrote  an  epistle  fuU  of  bitter  derision  of  the  arrogant  pretensions  of 
the  Roman  bishop.  In  a  synod  convened  at  Carthage,  the  African  bishops 
unanimously  protested  against  Rome  (§  71).  While  these  things  were  tran- 
spiring, Valerian  published  his  edict  against  the  Christians.  Cyprian  had 
now  become  too  conspicuous  to  find  safety  in  another  flight.  Having  ac- 
knowledged himself  a  Christian  and  a  bishop,  he  was  banished  by  the  pro- 
consul to  Curbi,  but  he  was  afterwards  permitted  to  return  to  his  garden  at 
Carthage.  After  a  year's  respite,  sentence  of  death  was  pronounced  against 
him  as  an  enemy  to  the  Roman  gods,  and  the  chief  of  a  criminal  association. 
He  was  accordingly  beheaded  on  the  fourteenth  of  Sept.  258.  No  obstruc- 
tion, however,  was  offered  to  his  admiring  friends,  as  they  performed  the 
last  offices  of  affection  to  him  in  his  death,  and  as  they  did  honor  to  his  life- 
lees  remains. 

§  85.    I.  The  School  of  Alexandria. 

E.  E.  F.  Gu€rik0,  de  schoU  qaa«  Alexandrlae  floruit,  catoebetlca.  Hal  18248.  2  P.  C  F.  G. 
OauMacK,  de  scbola,  quae  Alex,  floroit,  cat  Stettin.  1826.  P.  L  ootnp.  Matter^  de  Tdcole  d'Alexan- 
drkL  Par.  (lS2a)  1810.  2  Th.  SttUr,  Geach.  do  chriatl.  Pbll.  vol.  L  p.42l8ii.  [Epitome  of  the  Ilist 
•r  PbiL  transl.  from  the  French  by  C,  8.  JJunry.  yoL  L  pp.  207-220.  ITeander,  Hiet  of  the  Chr. 
SeL  tniid.  by  J.  Torrey.  toL  L  pp.  52(M)67.] 

About  the  middle  of  the  second  century  arose  in  Alexandria  an  ecclesias- 
tieal  school,  under  the  superintendence  of  the  bishop,  after  the  model  of  the 
Khools  of  philosophy.  Sooner  or  later,  it  was  unavoidable  that  the  science 
and  literature  of  Greece  should  become  enlisted  in  the  service  of  the  cause 
of  Christ,  (a)  This  had  already  been  unintentionally  commenced  by  the 
Apologists,  but  it  was  now  consummated  from  a  direct  purpose  and  prefer- 
ence in  the  Alexandrian  school.  Among  those  who  presided  over  this  school, 
was  Pantaenus  (about  180),  previously  a  Stoic,  and  since  immortalized  by 
bis  pupils,  (h)  Titus  Flavins  Clemens^  probably  fh)m  Athens,  did  not  embrace 
Christianity  until  mature  years,  and  after  exhausting  all  the  advantages  of 
Greek  and  Christian  culture,  he  professed  to  have  found  in  Pantaenus  a  cor- 
rect interpreter  of  the  Scriptures.  He  first  became  the  assistant  and  then 
the  successor  of  his  chosen  teacher  in  the  management  of  the  school  (about 
191-202),  until  just  before  the  persecution  under  Severus,  when  he  betook 
himself  to  the  house  of  one  of  his  pupils.  The  last  trace  we  have  of  him 
was  at  Jerusalem,  in  the  year  211.  In  a  work  which  he  divided  into  three 
parts,  according  to  the  successive  steps  of  Conversion,  Discipline,  and  Free 
longfat,  he  has  collected  in  a  motley  form,  principally  from  the  trea- 
lores  of  Grecian  wisdom,  whatever  is  favorable  to  Christianity,  contended 
against  every  thing  hos^e  to  the  gospel  in  Gnosticism,  determined  with 

a)  {S(m€€raiH)  Le  Platontame  d^Toil^.  Colog.  (Amaterd.)  ITOa  Mothem,  de  tnrbata  per  reo.  Pla- 
te. Eec  Helmat  1729.  On  the  other  hand :  BaltuSy  defense  des  S.  P6rca,  accnsds  de  Platonlstne. 
ht.  1711. 4  Eeil  de  doctoribaa  vet  £co.  cnlpa  oormptae  per  Plat  sententiaa  Theoli^lae  llberandiaw 
IfL  ITMoL  22  Cmmt  4.  (0pp.  ed.  Ooldhom.  Lp&  1821.  Tb.  IL) 

I)  JTMab.  H.  eec  Y,  10. 


92  ANCIENT  CHUBCH  HISTORY.    FEB.  L    DIY.  XL    A.  D.  100-811 

much  liberality  and  moderation  many  controversial  questions  in  ecclesiastioal 
ethics,  and  in  an  animated  and  snggestive  form  has  ventured  only  to  hint  at 
his  peculiar  views,  (c)  Origen^  bom  at  Alexandria  (185),  was  the  son  of 
Leonides,  whose  martyrdom  (202)  he  was  prevented  from  sharing  by  the 
gentle  violence  of  his  mother,  who  controlled  his  passions,  and  educated  him 
with  pious  care.  With  a  soaring  spirit,  a  firm  character,  and  an  iron  dili- 
gence (^Adapidvnor,  XaXfccn-fpor),  he  soon  made  himself  master  of  the  Alex- 
andrian learning,  and  a  scribe  well  instructed  unto  the  kingdom  of  heaven. 
The  youth  of  eighteen  years  was  raised  to  the  dignity  of  President  of  the 
School,  and  continued  to  live  in  poverty,  refusing  all  compensation  from  his 
pupils,  and  practising  the  utmost  abstemiousness.  Before  he  renounced  his 
early  views  of  the  literal  interpretation  of  the  Scriptures,  in  a  moment  of 
bold  enthusiasm,  he  yielded  a  literal  obedience  to  one  of  their  supposed  re- 
quirements, {d)  His  superior  development  appears  to  have  received  as  much 
assistance  from  the  lectures  of  Ammonius  Saccas  {e)  as  from  the  writings  of 
Clement.  The  instruction  of  the  children  of  his  scliool  he  committed  to  an 
assistant,  while  he  conducted  the  more  advanced  pupils  through  the  whole 
range  of  Grecian  studies,  to  the  intellectual  comprehension  of  the  Scriptures, 
and  to  the  philosophy  of  Christianity.  His  irregular  ordination  as  a  presby- 
ter at  Caesarea  (228),  afforded  a  pretext  for  the  manifestation  of  the  aver- 
sion which  his  bishop,  Demetrius^  entertained  toward  him,  and  he  was  ac- 
cordingly thrust  out  of  the  Church  (281).  This  episcopal  violence,  however, 
was  respected  only  by  those  who  took  no  interest  in  scientific  investiga- 
tions. Origen  continued  to  live  sometimes  in  learned  leisure  at  Caesarea, 
and  sometimes  in  foreign  countries  on  business  connected  with  the  Church. 
He  died  at  Tyre  (254),  having  previously  confessed  his  faith  with  unshaken 
constancy  during  the  Decian  persecution.  By  his  employment  of  the  Alex- 
andrian Philology  in  the  criticism  and  interpretation  of  the  Scriptures,  he 
became  the  acknowledged  master  of  a  scientific  method  of  scriptural  investi- 
gation, by  the  grammatical  as  well  as  the  allegorical  style  of  explanation. 
His  work  on  the  Principles,  is  the  first  attempt  to  comprise  the  principles  of 
Christianity  in  a  single  scientific  work.    Only  a  part  of  his  writings  have 

c)  A^TOf  irporpc TTiK^f  wpht  "EWrjyas,  UauZay^^^*  "Hrpttfiarus.  Homily :  Tls  6  fft^^ 
fitrot  vKoiffios  ;  ed.  (7.  Begaar^  Tn^.  1610.  More  candid  and  bolder  are  the  Gloaeea  npon  tba 
Bcrlptnres,  6irorinrfitf(rctf,  which  are  lost  with  the  exception  of  a  crippled  explanation  of  tha  Cath. 
Eplstlee,  under  the  titie  of  Adambrationa.  Perhaps,  also,  the  in  r&¥  wpof^TiriK&y  iKKoyai 
belonged  to  this  work.  HymnasinC.  Salvatorom,  ed.  F.  Piper^  Oott  1S85.  0pp.  ed.  SyJhurg^ 
Heidelb.  li»2.  f  and  often.  PoUer,  Ox.  1716. 1  Yen.  1767. 2  Th.  f  Pocket  edition  in  the  8d  part  of 
the  BlbL  aacra,  ed.  R.  Klolt,  Lp«L  1881-S4.  4  Th.^Ho/stede  ds  Groct^  de  Clem.  6.  do  vl,  qnani  PhiL 
gr.  inpr.  platonica  habnit  ad  Clem,  informandam.  Oron.  1826w  CGUtty  Clem,  in  Erech.  u.  Gruber^ 
Eneyd.  vol  XVIIL  p.  isa.  2>aMfi«,  de  yvweu^  Clem,  et  de  vestigits  neoplatonicae  pbil.  In  ea  ob- 
▼Ua.  Lps.  IflSl.  F.  R.  EyUrt,  Oem.  al&  Pbil.  d.  Dichter.  Lps.  1682.  Baur,  Chr.  Onoeia.  p.  002ia. 
Kling,  Bedeutang  dee  Clem,  t  d.  Entat  d.  ohr.  Theol.  (Stud.  u.  Krit  1S41.  P.  4.)  [Art  Clem,  (n  W. 
Bmith*8  Diet  of  Blog.  and  Mythol.  New  York.  1862.  2  vols.] 

d)  Matt.  19, 12.  oomp.  6,  29a.  EMth.  II.  ooo.  VI,  8.  oomp.  2ft.  Orig.  in  Matth.  tom.  16.  (Th.  IlL  p. 
(1618&)  comp.  SohniUer,  OHg.  1L  d.  Orundlehren  d.  Olanbenswiia.  StuUf.  1886.  pi  XXXIIIsai  On 
the  other  hand:  Engtlhnrdt,  in  d.  Stud.  n.  Krit  1888.  P.  1.  p.  167sa. 

e)  n.  A.  JMgl,  der  Bericht  d.  Porphyr.  ft.  Orig.  Uegonab.  1886.  Redepennlng^  App.  9.  to  toL  I. 
Z.  KrUg^r,  0.  daa  Verb.  d.  Orig.  in  Amm.  9aoe.  (Illgen's  Zeitachr.  184a  P.  1.) 


CHAP.  IT.    DOCTRIUES.    %  S6.  ALEXANDRIAN  THEOLOGY.    { 87.  ORIOEN.    93 

come  down  to  modem  times,  some  of  them  in  a  Latin  translation  by  Evjlnus^ 
and  others  in  extracts  by  the  orthodox  writers  of  his  age.  (/)  Clement 
reached  Christianity  through  philosophy,  Origen  reached  philosophy  through 
Christianity.  The  former  proceeded  in  the  style  of  an  eclectic  philosopher, 
in  whose  conception  of  a  complete  gnostic  the  Stoical  ideal  predominated, 
with  its  calm  tranquillity  derived  not  from  the  hnman  but  from  the  divine 
^>irit ;  the  latter  showed  a  more  decided  predilection  for  Plato.  Both  grasped 
alter  a  knowledge  which  should  comprehend  the  universe,  but  their  efforts 
were  characterized  more  by  a  literary  fondness  for  philosophy,  than  by  philo- 
sophical depth,  as  they  developed  the  religious  ideas  involved  in  the  facts  of 
Christianity,  smoothed  away  the  difficulties  which  must  attend  a  one-sided 
and  purely  historical  conception  of  it,  and  elevated  it  above  the  extremes  of 
Judaism  and  of  Gnosticism,  even  though  its  truths  were  received  in  a  limited 
form.  Taken  together,  their  doctrines  constituted  one  comprehensive  whole, 
whose  form  was  a  philosophy  of  Christianity,  whose  substance  was  the  free- 
dom of  the  mind  in  its  everlasting  activity,  and  whose  source  was  the  Deity 
himself. 

8  86.  II.     Characteristics  of  the  Alexandrian  Theology. 

1.  Philosophy  was  to  the  Greek  what  the  law  was  to  the  Jew,  an  in- 
structor showing  the  need  of  Christ,  and  proposing  a  proper  pattern  of 
righteousness.  God  has  revealed  his  true  nature  in  appropriate  methods, 
through  the  Logos  to  all  nations,  (a)  The  highest  revelation  he  has  ever 
made  of  himself  is  in  Christianity,  by  means  of  which  many  a  retired  vil- 
lage has  become  an  Athens.  The  position  of  the  faith  of  the  common  people 
is  that  in  which  a  merely  historical  Christianity  is  received  on  the  authority 
of  others  (n-tWis),  but  the  higher  position  of  the  perfect  Christian  is  that  in 
which  truth  is  contemplated  with  a  free  insight,  and  a  full  consent  of  the 
mind  (ywo-if).  The  doctrines  of  the  Gnosis  were  described  as  those  secret 
traditions  which  originally  proceeded  from  Christ,  but  they  were  in  fact  the 
free  scientific  speculations  respecting  well  established  ecclesiastical  tradi- 
tions, (b)  The  Scriptures  were  looked  upon  as  the  result  of  divine  inspira- 
tion, though  in  different  degrees,  and  it  was  thought  that  every  part  of  them 
should  receive  a  signification  worthy  of  God.  Where  such  a  meaning  was 
not  supplied  by  the  mere  words,  the  hidden  sense  was  developed  from  the 


/)  1)  For  the  restonitlon  of  the  Septnaglnt  Bcvlslon  of  the  tf:xt  of  tho  O.  T.  and  \ta  translations: 
ri  i^avXa,    Hexaplor.  qiue  raperaant  ed.  B.  de  Mon^auQoru  Par.  1718.  3  Th.  f    C.  F.  Rihrdi^ 
IfiL  ITtts.  2  Tb.    2)  Schollao  arifi«n&<rtt$j  commentaries  r6fxot^  and  practical  expositIon^  6fii\tai 
ca  most  of  the  sacred  books,  only  a  few  less  Important  parts  of  which  are  preserved  in  Ruflnus  and  Je- 
nne.  8)  Tltpl  ipx&^t  ^  ^^*  ^'^^  ^  ^^^  ^  ^^^  ^^^  greater  part  of  the  4th  vol.  are  extant  in  the  Greek, 
tke  raoaioder  Is  in  Rafla's  Lit  version,  ed.  K  B.  Redepenning.  Lp«.  18S8.    4)  Kar^  KcAirou. — 
Oppi  ed.  C  et  r.  V.  Dtlarus,  Par.  1T38<«.  4  Th.  f    LommatzMch,  Ber.  1881-44  17  Th.— //m^iw*, 
Ortwiiana,  prefixed  to  bis  edit,  of  the  Commentaries,  (Par.  1679.)  and  In  the  4th  vol.  of  the  edit  of 
MarM.    G.  ThomaHu*^  Orig.  Nnmb.  1987.    K  R.  Rfdfj)enning,  Grig.  Lcben  a  Lchre.  Bonn. 
19I1-4l  2  pts.    [Article  from  the  British  Quart.  Bev.  in  Eclectic  Mog.  of  January,  1S46.  pp.  Sl-101.] 
a)  Clem.  Strom.  L  p.  281.  VL  pi  761.    On  the  other  side :  V.  p.  620.  VL  p.  757. 
ft)  iTMiider,  de  fldei  gnoseotqae  Idea  seo.  Clem.  Ileidlb.  1811. 


94  ANCIENT  Cni'KCn  HISTORY.    PER.  L    DIV.  IL    A.  D.  100-812. 

letter  by  means  of  allegorical  interpretations,  (e)  2.  God  is  limited  only  by 
bis  own  will,  and  is  inscrutable  to  bis  creatures,  yet  bo  bas  revealed  bimselr 
not  only  by  means  of  tbe  Logos,  wbicb  be  voluntarily  and  from  all  eternity 
sent  fortb,  and  wbicb  is  at  tbe  same  time  Qod.  and  tbe  all  pervading  reason, 
but  also  by  means  of  tbe  Holy  Spirit,  tbe  personal  source  of  all  sanctification. 
Botb  of  tbose  are  developments  of  tbe  divine  essence,  and  altbougb  essentially 
subordinate  to  tbe  absolute  Deity,  tbey  constitute  a  unity  with  bim.  By  the 
agency  of  tbe  Logos,  who  must  therefore  have  existed  before  it,  God 
created  tbe  world  of  spirits,  all  of  whom  were  originally  equal  in  dignity  and 
power,  but  as  God  is  eternally  active,  tbe  series  of  worlds  by  which  be  is 
developed  can  have  neither  beginning  nor  end.  8.  The  spirit  alone  is  worthy 
of  confidence,  matter  is  tbe  form  in  which  evil  is  manifested,  and  yet  it  is  tbe 
vessel  in  which  tbe  spirit  must  be  purified.  Each  world-sphere  is  adapted  to 
that  peculiar  state  of  tbe  spirits  inhabiting  it,  which  bas  been  produced  by 
tbe  exercise  of  their  moral  freedom.  Even  the  present  condition  of  man 
must  have  been  produced  by  something  voluntarily  done,  involving  him  in 
guilt.  The  Fall  of  man  spoken  of  by  Moses,  is  an  allegorical  representation 
of  a  fall  anterior  to  man's  present  earthly  existence,  in  wbicb  he  is  doing 
penance  for  what  be  then  did,  and  passing  through  a  process  of  purification. 
Moral  freedom  continues  an  inalienable  attribute  of  fallen  man,  unimpaired 
even  in  death..  4.  The  Logos,  that  ho  might  fnlly  reveal  himself  in  Christ 
assumed  an  ethereal  body,  by  means  of  a  human  soul  (^xi)-  '^^  P^^  o^ 
Christianity  being  tbe  same  with  that  of  the  moral  universe  in  general,  of 
course  embraces  all  intellectual  beings  in  all  worlds.  To  those  who  are  in  an 
inferior  stage  of  moral  improvement,  Christianity  is  a  redemption,  but  to 
those  who  are  perfect  it  is  a  free  fellowship,  (d)  6.  There  is  to  be  no  resur- 
rection of  tbe  flesh,  but  a  development  of  higher  organs,  (e)  not  an  earthly 
but  a  celestial  kingdom  of  Christy  not  an  everlasting  punishment  in  bell,  but 
on  the  other  hand  every  thing  which  has  fallen  from  Gk>d  shall  at  some  period 
be  restored  to  its  original  source  (airoKaTairraais   rav  Trdjrrav). 

§  87.    III.  Influence  of  Origen, 

The  doctrines  of  the  Church  were  defended  by  Origen  in  a  variety  of 
ways.  It  was  through  his  influence  that  the  expectation  which  then  prevaUed 
with  respect  to  a  near  approach  of  Christ's  second  advent,  and  a  millennial 
kingdom,  began  to  be  regarded  as  heretical,  or  at  least  fanatical.  For  centu- 
ries his  influence  upon  the  whole  Church  was  powerful,  by  means  of  bis  writ- 
ings and  a  circle  of  followers  which  gathered  around  him,  and  formed  a 
seminary  of  eminent  teachers  and  bishops  for  tbe  Church.  He  was  himself, 
however,  well  aware  that  his  doctrines  were  not  suitable  for  the  common 
mind,  and  his  views  of  Christian  science  allowed  him  intentionally  so  to  write 
that  bis  language  was  unintelligible,  and  even  conveyed  error,  to  all  but  the 


c)  J.  A.  EmMtl,  de  Grig.  interpretationlB  gnunm.  anctore.  (0pp.  crit  Lngd.  1704  p.  288s8l)  (X  JZL 
Hagenhach,  Obss.  ctrca  dig.  methodam  interpret  S.  So.  Bui  182S.  Ck)mpu  (/TifneQ  in  Winen  kxlt 
Joarn.  1825.  vol.  IIL  part  4. 

d)  Oriff.  in  Jo.  torn.  I.  (Th.  IV.  p.  22.)    e)  Orig,  0pp.  Th.  L  p  Ste. 


CHAP.  IV.    DOCTBINES.    {  8T.  DI0NYSIU9.  {  88.  AFEICANUS,  niPP0I«TTU8.   95 

initiated,  (a)  His  ideal  tendency  to  go  beyond  historical  traditions  and  those 
pocnliarities  which  so  strongly  contrasted  with  what  was  common  in  the 
Church,  were  sare,  sooner  or  later,  to  call  forth  opp^tion.  The  first  objec- 
tions urged  against  him  were  of  the  vagnest  character,  and  generally  of  a  per- 
sonal natnro,  or  founded  on  gross  exaggerations.  Methadiu^^  Bishop  of  Tyre 
(d.  811X  finally  attacked  his  doctrines  respecting  the  development  of  worlds, 
the  resurrection  and  the  freedom  of  the  will,  {b)  Ilis  disciples  made  every 
eflbrt  to  vindicate  the  honor  and  orthodoxy  of  their  illustrious  master.  The 
orthodoxy  of  some  of  his  views  was  shown  by  comparing  them  with  the  in- 
definite creeds  of  that  day,  and  others  were  excused  on  the  ground  that  they 
were  advanced  only  as  hypotheses.  Even  when  in  prison  the  learned  Pam' 
phUua  of  Caesarea  wrote  an  apology,  which  was  afterwards  sealed,  as  it  were, 
with  his  own  blood  (809),  and  was  completed  by  Evulius,  (c)  Among  Lis 
Immediate  pupils,  IHonyHus,  his  successor  in  the  office  of  instructor  after  288) 
and  Bishop  of  Alexandria  after  248,  has  represented  especially  the  depart- 
ment of  ecclesiastical  learning,  with  great  zeal  for  the  Church,  but  with  much 
fiberality  with  respect  to  genuine  science,  (d)  and  O^regoriuSj  after  244,  Bishop 
of  Neo-Caesarea,  and  sumamed  Thaumaturgui  by  the  orthodox  of  subsequent 
timas,  represented  Origen^s  practical  ascetic  tendency,  (e) 

§  88.    Appendix  to  the  Literary  History, 

A  pions  v^eration  for  Christian  antiquity  has  usually  preserved  with 
much  care  the  names  of  some  writers  who  are  not  fairly  entitled  to  a  place 
hi  history  by  their  character  or  influence.  Athenagoras^  according  to  some 
imcertain  accounts,  the  predecessor  of  Pantacnus  in  Alexandria,  wrote  with 
eonsiderable  philosophical  talent  a  defence  of  the  doctrine  of  tlio  resurreo- 
tion  (about  180).  (a)  Julius  Afrieanus,  a  presbyter  at  Nicopolis  (Emmaus)  and 
t  fiiend  of  Origen,  though  more  advanced  in  age  (d.  about  232),  was  a  learned 
annalist,  and  by  some  extant  letters  appears  to  have  been  a  judicious  critic  of 
the  Scriptures,  (b)  Hippolytus^  a  bishop,  and  a  contemporary  of  Origen,  was 
nid  by  Eusebius  and  Jerome  to  have  left  valuable  writings  in  explanation  of 
the  Scriptures,  and  in  refutation  of  heretics,  (c)    The  titles  and  fragments  of 

a)  Orig.  t.  Oela.  Ill,  T9.  Stromm.  YL  in  ffieron.  ApoL  L  adv.  Rnf.  o.  18. 
h)  n«p(  &»a4rr<£<rc«fff,  vcpl  r&r  yfrrirAvt  wtpl  avrt^uvtrlov.  Fragm.  in  Epiph.  hacr.  61 
PM.  eod.  tH,  S8S.  comp.  Soemt  H.  eec  YI,  la. 

e)  ApologlM  pro  Ori^  111).  YL  Greek  Frag,  in  Phot  ood.  118.    Tho  first  book  is  in  Rnfln's  trans- 


<)  Fngmeats:  Bom.  1797.  t  OaUand,  Bibl  PP.  Tb.  III.  p.  48l8a 

«)  Elf  'a^Tfirriw  vpoa^wirririKha  koI  wayriyvptKhs  \6yos.  'EiricrroA^  KuKoiiK'fi.  Ills  life 
by  OrifDrhia  Vjm.  from  narratiTOS  aapplied  by  his  grandmother.  0pp.  c.  vita  ed.  G.  Votshu^  Mog. 
IIM.  4  Fr^rroents  of  bis  writings  In  Anff.  Mali  N.  Coll  Th.  YII.  P.  I.  p.  ITOss.  Comp.  £u6eb.  U. 
MeLVI,aO.YII,14. 

•)  Titpl  hmffrdffttts  rw  ptKp&Wt  ed.  Redienberg^  Lpa.  1685. 

I)  Upcvaypwpmv  w4rrt  ewovida'fAaTcu  ^E-rioT.  wtpl  r^s  xarii  iZovo'dyyuy  ivroplas 
vilttcD  to  Origen,  with  the  reply  of  the  latter,— *Eiri(rr.  wphs  *Apt<rrfliriVt  a  harmony  of  the  ge- 
utk^  of  JcMUL  iioutht  Bellq.  aacr.  toL  IL 

e)  ItMb.  H.  eeo.  YI,  SO,  iS,  41  HUran,  caUl  c.  61.  PkoL  ood.  121.  EUd^etu  in  Anemani  BlbL 
«twLULP.  L 


96  ANCIENT  CHUBCH  HISTORY.    FES.  L    DIY.  II.    A.  D.  100-811 

his  works  are  thought  by  many  to  indicate  an  oriental  character,  and  a  de- 
gree of  edacation  somewhere  between  that  of  Origen  and  that  of  Irenaeus.  {d) 
But  his  statue,  found  in  the  Ager  Veranus^  near  Home  (1551),  with  the  Eas- 
ter cycle  engraved  upon  his  cathedra  and  a  catalogue  of  his  writings^  imply 
that  he  must  have  resided  in  the  vicinity  of  Rome,  and  that  the  Portua  Ro- 
manus  mentioned  as  his  bishopric,  must  have  been  the  port  near  Ostia.  (e) 
Yet,  as  Prudentius  had  sung  the  martyrdom  of  a  highly  esteemed  Novatian 
presbyter,  who,  in  view  of  death,  returned  to  the  Catholic  Church,  and  after 
his  execution  near  the  mouths  of  the  Tiber,  had  been  conveyed  to  the  Roman 
catacombs,  (/)  and  in  the  time  of  that  poet  had  been  honored  with  a  mag- 
nificent martyrium,  and  a  great  annual  festival  at  Rome,  the  discoverers  of 
this  statue  came  to  the  conclusion  that  the  martyr  was  the  same  person  as  the 
ecclesiastical  writer,  (g)  Later  martyrologies,  however,  indicate  that  the  mar- 
tyr came  to  Rome  from  Antioch,  where  a  lively  interest  existed  in  favor  of 
Novatianism.  (h)  Lactantivs  Firmianus,  an  Italian  preceptor  to  the  prince 
Crispus,  in  whose  misfortunes  he  was  probably  involved  (d.  about  830),  com- 
menced, during  his  residence  as  a  rhetorician  at  Nicomedia,  in  the  midst  of 
the  last  persecution,  his  treatise  on  the  nature  and  achievements  of  Chris- 
tianity, in  contrast  with  those  of  Heathenism.  In  this  work  he  has  shed  all 
the  rhetorical  splendor  of  his  age  upon  the  gospel,  and  has  acquired  the  ap- 
pellation of  a  Christian  Cicero.  His  belief  in  a  principle  of  evil  appointed 
by  God,  and  of  equal  rank  with  Christ,  and  in  a  millennial  kingdom,  may  be 
regarded  as  a  lingering  shadow  of  the  preceding  century,  (i) 

§  89.    Apocryphal  Literature. 

Among  the  Jews,  the  heathen,  and  the  Christians  of  this  period,  it  was 
thought  that  the  truth  might,  without  impropriety,  be  defended  by  means  of 
what  was  untrue.  The  lives  of  their  heroes  and  saints  especially  might  be 
embellished  as  much  as  they  pleased,  and  the  credit  of  such  compositions 
might  be  aided  by  attaching  to  them  some  celebrated  name.  In  this  way  was 
produced,  within  the  Church  as  well  as  beyond  its  pale  an  apocryphal  litera- 
ture, composed  partially  of  harmless  fictions  and  popular  legends,  and  partially 

d)  HippoL  Opp.  ed.  Fabricios.  Hamb.  17166flw  8  volflb  t 

e)  E.  J.  Kimmel,  dc  Ilip.  vita  et  8cripti&  P.  I.  Jen.  1S89.  L.  F.  W.  Seinecke^  Leben  n.  Schir.  d. 
Hipp.  (Illgen*s  Zeitflchr.  1342.  P.  8.)  On  the  other  side:  C.  G.  JlaeneU,  de  Uipp.  Oott  ISSa  4.  M 
Bishop  of  Boatra. 

/)  Porlsteph.  hym.  11. 

g)  According  to  Winkdmann^  Werke,  cd.  hj  VLejet  &  Schnlzc,  toI  XVII.  p.  834  the  at^oe  be- 
longed to  the  time  of  Alex.  Scverus — certainly  too  early— according  to  PUiUifr^  in  d.  Beacreib.  d. 
Stadt  Bom.  by  Platner,  Bansen,  &  otb.  toI  2.  p.  829.  the  latest  period  vras  that  of  the  6th  cent  [See 
BunterCt  Hipp.  &  his  Age.  Lond.  1S58.  C  Wbrdsworth^  H.  &  the  Church  of  Kome,  4.  Lond.  1858.  and 
articles  in  the  Jan'y  Nos.  of  the  Edinb.  &  English  Beviewa  for  lvS58.] 

h)  The  combined  evidence  thus  obtained  may  be  seen  In  GieaeUr^  [Eccles.  Hist  transl.  by  Da* 
vid^oriy  Edinb.  vol.  I.  p.  249.  note  9.] 

i)  Institationam  div.  1.  YII.  De  mortibns  perseoutomm.  De  ira  DcL  De  opiflcio  Dei,  vel  de  forma- 
tlonehomini&  Opp.  ed.  B&nemann,  Lps.  1789.  Lebrun  el  LengUi  Dxtfretnoyy  Par.  1748.  2  Th.  4 
O.  F.  FritMche^  Lps.  1842.--1  2  T.—F.  O.  Ph.  Amnion^  Lact  opiniones  de  rel.  in  systema  redacCae, 
d8&  IL  Erl.  1820.  //.  J.  Spyker^  do  prctio  Institationibos  Lact  tiibaondo.  Lngd.  1S26.  L,  IfaiMtn&eht, 
£tndes  Bur  Lact  Strassb.  1887. 


CUAP.  IV.    DOGTBINEd.    f  8»-  APOCRYPHAL  WRITINGS.  97 

of  intentional  forgeries,  (a)  Writings  of  the  former  kind  have  been  so  tho- 
ronghlj  revised  by  the  Gnostics  and  Manichacans,  that  their  origin  and  pri- 
marj  design  can  no  longer  be  determined  with  any  certainty,  and  even  their 
dogmatic  character  is  for  the  most  part  indeterminate  and  contradictory.  In 
this  respect  they  are  a  fair  exemplification  of  the  age  which  gave  them  birth. 
Even  in  those  rare  instances  in  which  the  deception  was  discovered  and  cen- 
tared  by  the  Church,  as  in  the  case  of  the  Acts  of  Paul  and  Theckla,  written 
under  the  impnlse  of  a  warm  affection  for  Pan],  and  an  almost  poetical  sen- 
timent in  behalf  of  the  daty  of  self-sacrifice,  the  work  remained  for  a  long 
time  in  circulation  among  the  Ohnrches.  (b)  1)  Among  those  called  Acts  of 
the  ApoBtUt  may  be  noticed  a  cycle  of  histories  pretending  to  give  an  account 
of  the  miracles  wrought  by  the  apostles,  collected  and  revised  so  as  to  favor 
the  interests  of  Manichaeism,  by  some  one  under  the  name  of  Leucius  Cha^ 
rinys,  (e)  2)  Jewish  imitations  of  earlier  prophetic  visions  were  sometimes 
used  by  Chri^fitlans  with  their  own  interpretation,  and  sometimes  counterfeited 
hy  Jewish  Christians,  to  show  the  completion  of  the  Messianic  prophecies  by 
ftcts  taken  from  the  life  of  Jesus,  (d)  8)  Some  lost  prophecies,  ascribed  to 
H}f4ta*pe^  an  ancient  Persian  seer,  gave  to  the  Asiatic  Christians  a  prophet 
of  the  Messiah,  from  their  own  native  region,  {e)  4)  The  Syhilline  Oracles 
were  written  by  many  different  authors  in  the  course  of  several  centuries,  {f) 
The  oldest  of  them  were  composed  by  heathen  and  Jewish  writers  to  sub- 
serve their  own  peculiar,  views,  and- in  many  instances  probably  as  a  poetical 
amosement.  But  the  principal  part  of  them  consisting  of  reproaches  against 
heathenism,  and  predictions  of  its  approaching  overthrow,  were  written  by 
Christians,  probably  not  so  mucli  to  oppose  and  alarm  their  enemies,  as  to  en- 
oourage  their  friends.  By  those  apologists,  however,  who  were  conversant 
with  pagan  literature,  they  were  made  use  of  as  divinely  inspired  writings. 

a)  Jren,  t,  2&— J/b<A«im,  de  caosfs  suppceltt  libror.  inter  Cbrist  (Das.  ad  H.  ecc  pert  Th. 

k)  Tertul.  de  bapt  e.  17.  Acta  S.  Paall  et  Theeklae,  ed.  Orctbe^  Splcileg.  Th.  I.  p.  Sim.  [Apoer. 
StvT«tLoDd.l821.] 

c)  T«r  'Aw0(rr6kt»w  %fpi6iou    Pbot  ood.  114  Acta  8.  Tboowct,  9(L  J.  0.  Thilo,  Lpe.  1828w 
ipokr.  EvT.  &.  Leben  Jesu.  p.  18s. 

i)  FabriHut,  Codex  paeodcplgr.  V.  T.  ed.  3.  Hatnb.  1712a.  2  Th.— The  book  of  Enoch  the  Pro- 

pbct. tran.  fh>m  an  Ethioplc  M9.  by  R.  Laurenee^Oxi.  (1S21.)  18^  A.  O.  Hoffman^  das  Buch  He- 

Mckla  Ueben.  mit  Gommentar.  Jena.  1888-&  2  Abth.  [Lond.  Christ  Observer,  (in  Littoll's  Rel.  Mag. 

Ittl.)  Book  of  Enoch.  M.  Stuart,  in  BibL  Uepoe.  for  Jan.  1840.  pp.  86-ld6.]-£zrae  L  lY.  (Fabric  Th. 

llTtn.^    Verelo  Aethioplca,  lat  angllceqae  reddltaa  Ji.  Laurence,  Oxf.  1820.— Ai  Hia^^Kai  rHv 

SvSfca  Uarpiapx^^*   ^  Grahf,  Spicil.  Th.  L  p.  145sft.  Corop.  C.  I.  XiUsck^  de  testam.  XII.  Pair. 

^  ISld  4 — Ascensio  {iyafiariK6y)  Isalae  vatis,  oposc  apnd.  Acthiopas  compertam,  c.  vers,  lat 

■BflleuiaqQe  ed.  R.  Laurence,  Oxon.  1819.    GiewUr,  retos  translstio  lat  vlsionls  Jcsalae  ed.  praef. 

AMtis  iH  Qott  1888.  4  compu  Nituch  to  d.  Bind.  a.  Krit  1830.  P.  2.  LOck^  Einl.  z.  Apok.  p.  12."^ 

Offwr^  (}e«cb.  d.  Urcbr.  vol  L  1.  p^  6Se«. 

«)  Fr.  Watek,  de  Hfstaspe.  (Comm.  8oc  Reg.  Oott  Th.  I.  p.  Sss.) 

/)  SlbjIHnorQm  Oracalonim  L  VIIL  ed.  Servatius  Oallaeus,  Anist  16S9.  4  On  tliis,  see  also  L 
A-XIV.  in An^M  Maji  Serlptorani  vett  nova  oollectia  Rom.  1828. 4  Th.  III.  p.  Z.—BUek,  Tl  Entst. 
^ZottinmensL  d.  Sib.  Orak.  (TheoL  Zeitschr.  BrL  1S19.  P.  1.  2.)  {David  BlondtU,  Treatise  of  the 
^Ui  Lond.  16«1.  C] 


98  A^XIENT  CnUECII  niSTOET.    PER.  I.    DIV.  ir.    A.  D.  100-«12. 

§  90.    Sulfordifiationists  and  Moruirchians, 

I.  AH  acconnts  of  tho  Monarcliians  are  derived  from  the  party  boetile  to  and  finally  viciorfons 
over  tbem,  as  e.  g.  TeriuUlan,  who  hated  them  as  opponents  of  Montantsm :  Epiphanhm  and  7%«o> 
dorei^  who  regarded  them  with  the  prejadfces  of  the  Athanasian  party;  and  Euaeliusy  the  mort  fm- 
partial*  but  not  Dnaffecte<l  by  the  spirit  and  views  of  the  age. 

IL  Martini^  Pragm.  Gcsch.  d.  dogma  v.  d.  Ooith.  Ch.  In  d.  ersten  4  •Tahrh.  Rost.  ISOO.  vol.  I. 
St'hUUrmachfr^  0.  d.  Gegens.  zw.  d.  Sabell.  n.  Athan.  VorsL  v.  d.  TrlnltAt  (Theol.  Zt-ltwhr.  Brl.  1S22. 
P.  8.  p.  295SS.)  Jfeinichent  de  Alogls,  Theodotlanls,  Artemonitls.  Lpe.  1S20.  L,  Lange^  Gesch.  n. 
Lehrbegr.  d.  Unltarler  vor  d.  Nlc.  Synode.  (Beltr.  z.  KGesch.  vol.  II.)  Liiz.  1881.  /c/^ni.  Abb.  in 
Illgen's  Zcltschr.  1882.  vol.  IL  Pt  2.  p.  ITpa)  188a  vol.  III.  Pt  1.  p.  Cftss.  PL  2.  p.  ITSss.  Com|i. 
GieteUr  In  d.  Stnd.  u.  KrlL  1888.  P.  4.  p.  121.'te.  B(mr,  d.  chr.  Ix^hre  v.  d.  DrclHnlgkolt  n.  Mensch- 
werd.  In  geech.  Entw.  Tub.  1841.  Tb.  L  p.  18288.  O.  A.  MHer^  d.  Lehro  ▼.  d.  Trln.  In  hl$t  Eotw. 
Hamb.  u.  0. 1S44.  vol  1.  p.  740a. 

Tho  whole  effort  made  hy  the  Church  of  this  period  to  rise  above  the 
religion  of  mere  feeling  to  tlie  possession  of  clear  ideas,  was  now  concen- 
trated in  the  inquiry,  Who  was  Christ  ?  The  answer  of  the  Jews,  declaring 
that  he  was  the  Son  of  God,  reminded  the  Greeks  of  the  sons  of  deities  in 
their  mythology,  {a)  As,  however,  the  doctrine  of  the  divine  unity  was 
considered  indispensable,  and  as  Christians  could  not  feel  that  the  essential 
glory  of  Christ  was  adequately  expressed,  when  it  was  said  in  Jewish  phrase, 
that  he  was  anointed  and  filled  with  the  Holy  Ghost,  the  attention  of  all  was 
turned  to  tho  philosophic  theory  of  the  Logan^  regarded  as  tliat  by  which 
God  contemplated  his  own  nature,  and  revealed  himself  in  the  universe  as 
far  as  it  is  an  image  of  the  divine  lifel  Two  parties  sprung  up  after  the 
middle  of  the  second  century,  neither  of  which  hesitated  to  call  Christ,  in  a 
Ilellenistic  sense,  not  only  a  Son  of  God,  but  God  himself.  One  of  these  be- 
lieved that  the  Logos  had  an  existence  before  our  world,  and  was  an  exact 
image  of  the  Deity,  but  a  subordinate  person.  The  popular  expression  with 
respect  to  the  generation  of  this  Logos,  must  have  been  understood  as  im- 
plying either  with  the  Gnostics,  that  it  was  an  emanation  from  the  divine 
essence,  or  with  the  Alexandrians,  that  it  was  an  eternal  procession  from  it 
by  an  exercise  of  the  divine  will.  According  to  this  view,  the  Holy  Spirit 
was  regarded  as  an  actual  person,  but  one  so  subordinate  and  so  little  regard- 
ed, that  many  who  looked  upon  the  Son  as  a  person,  held  that  the  Spirit 
was  merely  a  power  of  God,  or  a  mode  of  his  operation.  This  relation  of 
the  divine  economy  has  been  denominated,  since  the  time  of  Tertullian,  the 
Trinity.  The  other  party,  either  from  its  regard  to  the  doctrine  of  the  divine 
unity  (fxovapxia\  held  that  Christ  was  a  mere  man,  but  bom  of  the  virgin  by 
the  power  of  the  divine  Spirit,  and  exalted  to  be  the  Lord  of  the  whole 
Church,  or  from  a  regard  to  Christ's  dignity,  believed  that  he  was  a  revela- 
tion and  manifestation  of  God  on  eartti.  (h)  Those  who  held  to  this  last 
view,  wore,  by  their  opponents,  culled  Patripassiani,  Justin  informs  us, 
that  even  in  his  day  it  was  not  regarded  as  inconsistent  with  Christianity  to 
hold  that  Christ  was  a  mere  man,  and  Tertullian  reluctantly  testifies,  that  in 
his  vicinity  this  was  the  common  sentiment,  (c)    The  first  kind  of  Monarch- 


a)  Ju8tin.  Apol.  L  c.  21.    a  Tryph.  c.  69.    Comp.  PUnii  Ep.  X,  96. 

V)  Athenag.  Legat  c.  10.    In  Justin,  c.  Trjrph.  c.  12S.    The  distinction  between  the  two  Undi 
of  Monarchlanlsm :  OtHg.  In  Jo.  torn.  2,  2. 

c)  Juntin.  c.  Tryph.  c  4S.     TertuL  adv.  Prax.  c.  8. 


CHAP.  lY.    DOCTBINES.    %  90.  SUBOBDIKATIONISTS  &  MOXARGIUANS.        99 

ianism  has  always,  since  that  time,  been  rejected  as  often  as  it  has  made  its 
appearance,  inasmuch  as  no  one  would  then  presume  to  think  of  Christ  in 
less  exalted  terms  than  those  in  which  the  Gnostic  heretics  represented  him. 
But  eren  where  no  such  a  rejection  took  place,  it  naturally  followed  that  no 
one  had  any  great  timidity  in  denying  a  mere  man.  On  the  other  hand,  the 
Mooarchians  of  the  second  class  were  regarded  in  many  parts  of  the  Church 
as  orthodox,  and  were  not  generally  very  seriously  opposed,  until  an  assault 
was  made  upon  them  by  persons  at  a  distance,  which  was  repelled  by 
an  appeal  to  apostolical  traditions,  and  to  the  Holy  Scriptures.  But  the 
Snbordinationists,  whose  views  were  more  conformable  to  those  of  the  com- 
mon people,  gradually  gained  upon  public  sentiment,  and  by  various  means 
at  the  command  of  the  hierarchy,  utterly  destroyed  even  the  second  kind  of 
Monarchianism,  which  had  been  rendered  suspicious  by  the  ease  with  which 
it  was  confounded  with  the  first.  By  ingenious  references  to  reason  and 
revelation,  the  views  of  the  triumphant  party  respecting  the  Logos  were 
made  to  correspond  with  the  philosophy  of  that  period. 

1)  Epiphanius  speaks  of  a  party  in  Asia  Minor  (about  170)  whom  he  wit- 
tily calls  Alogi^  because  they  rejected  the  doctrine  of  the  Logos  and  the  gos- 
pd  by  John,  together  with  the  doctrine  of  the  Millennium  and  the  book  of 
Bevdationa.    They  were  probably  the  same  persons  as  those  mentioned  by 
Irenaeus  as  having  rejected  the  gospel  by  John,  and  the  idea  of  the  pro- 
phetic gifts  of  the  Spirit.    It  is  evident  that  they  were  opposed  to  the  Mon- 
tanista,  bat  we  are  left  in  doubt  whether  they  took  offence  at  the  word  Lo- 
gos merely  as  a  learned  expression,  or  whether  they  were  really  Monarchians, 
as  they  were  regarded  by  Epiphanius.  {d)     2)  Fraxeas^  distinguished  as  a 
eonfessor  in  the  time  of  Marcus  Aurelius,  and  sent  from  Asia  Minor  to 
Rome  to  induce  the  churches  in  the  latter  city  to  refuse  all  fellowship 
with  the  Montanists,  taught  without  molestation  the  second  kind  of  Mo- 
aarchianism,  respecting  the  incarnation  of  one  divine  Spirit  in  Christ.    In 
Outhoge,  however,  he  was  accused  of  heresy  by  Tertullian.  (^)    But  The^ 
•i/>tu9^  the  Tanner,  who  came  about  the  same  time  from  Byzantium  to  Rome, 
md  began  to  propagate  the  first  kind  of  Monarchianism,  was  driven  from 
the  Church  by  Victor^  Bishop  of  Rome.    His  party  was  distinguished  for 
secular  learning,  made  use  of  the  Scriptures  as  of  a  merely  human  produc- 
tion, and  was  at  one  time  powerful  enough  to  elevate  one  of  their  own  num- 
ber to  the  See  of  Rome  itself.    It  was  not  long,  however,  before  their  bishop 
WIS  attacked  by  persons  sent  by  God,  or  by  episcopal  influence,  and  com- 
piled to  abdicate.    From  this  party  proceeded  another  Theodotns,  a  money- 
Vroker,  who  became  the  head  of  the  Melchizedecians^  who  are  said  to  have 
honored  Melchizedek  as  a  heavenly  Redeemer,  superior  to  the  earthly.    Ar^ 
ffln<m  was  also  excluded  fVom  the  Church  of  Rome,  for  maintaining  that  the 
established  doctrine  of  the  Church  had  always  been,  that  the  Redeemer  was 
BO  more  than  a  man,  and  that  this  had  never  been  perverted  or  changed  untH 


(0  Epiph.  baer.  51.  54.  8.    Jren,  III,  11.  comp.  Euth.  11.  ecc.  YII,  25.— iT.  MerM,  bist  krit 
AifUir.  d.  Streltlgk.  d.  Aloger.  fi.  d.  Apok.  FrkC  n.  Lpa.  17S2. 
0  Teriid  «dT.  PnzMo. 


100  AKCIENT  CHUECH  HISTORY.    PERL    DIV.  IL    A.  D.  100-812. 

the  time  of  Zepbyrinus,  who  then  occopied  the  episcopal  chair  (201-218).  (/) 
8)  NbetvH,  of  Smyrna,  and  probably  a  presbyter  in  Ephesus,  was  excluded 
(aboQt  280)  from  his  church  as  a  Patripassian.  That  he  should  have  repelled 
this  accusation  in  such  decided  terms,  is  only  to  be  explained  on  the  ground 
that  he  held  to  the  second  kind  of  Monarchianism.  (g)  To  this  also,  BeryU 
2t/«,  of  Bostra,  professed  adherence.  He  denied  that  our  Saviour  had  any 
personal  existence  prior  to  the  incarnation,  or  that  there  was  in  Christ  a  di- 
vine nature  distinct  from  that  of  the  Father.  He,  however,  conceded  that 
the  Godhead  of  the  Father  dwelt  in  the  person  of  Jesus.  Under  the  instruc- 
tion of  Origen,  he  finally  renounced  these  views,  and  embraced  another  sys- 
tem of  faith.  (Ji)  SahelUus^  a  presbyter  of  Ptolemais  (250-260),  expressed 
the  same  doctrine  in  terms  still  nearer  those  commonly  used  in  the  Church. 
According  to  him,  the  Father,  the  Son,  and  the  Spirit,  were  only  the  differ- 
ent forms  in  which  the  supreme  Unity,  which  unfolds  itself  in  human  affairs 
as  a  Triad,  reveals  himself  to  men.  In  the  Pentapolis,  his  doctrine  was  re- 
garded as  orthodox,  until  Dionysim^  of  Alexandria,  brought  against  him  the 
prelatical  authority,  and  the  stores  of  learning.  But  when  the  latter,  in  the 
course  of  the  controversy,  carried  the  doctrine  of  Origen  so  far  as  to  assert 
that  the  Logos  was  created  by  the  Father,  was  unequal  to  him  in  nature,  and 
began  to  exist  in  time,  I>iony$iu8^  Bishop  of  Rome,  maintained  against  him 
a  doctrine  which  the  Alexandrian  bishop  would  not  have  denied,  that  the 
Son  had  an  eternal  existence  in  the  Father.  (0  4)  Paul  of  Samosata,  afler 
260  Bishop  of  Antioch,  appears  to  have  effected  a  union  of  the  two  kinds  of 
Monarchianism,  although  the  first  was  decidedly  predominant  in  his  system. 
He  maintained  that  Jesus,  as  a  man,  was  begotten  by  the  Holy  Ghost,  and 
that  the  divine  Logos  which  then  began  personally  to  exist,  had  a  peculiar 
connection  with  him.  The  Syrian  bishops  were  violently  opposed  to  their 
Metropolitan,  conspired  against  him  at  three  different  Synods,  and  at  An* 
tioch,  in  the  year  269,  proclaimed  his  deposition.  Their  enmity  seems  to 
have  been  much  excited  by  his  political  position  and  worldly  honors,  (k)  and 
it  was  not  until  the  year  272,  when  the  imperial  power  co-operated  with 
them,  that  their  act  of  deposition  was  carried  into  effect.  The  fall  of  this 
powerf\d  bishop  decided  the  fate  of  the  Monarchians,  who  are  henceforth 
mentioned  only  as  isolated  individuals,  and  as  heretics  already  condemned 
(Sabelliani,  Samosateniani.)  In  the  public  acts  of  this  Synod,  the  Sabellian 
form  of  expression,  according  to  which  the  Son  is  of  a  nature  similar  to  that 
of  the  Father  (6fioov<nos  r^  frarpi),  was  also  condemned,  (l) 

/)  Teriul  do  praescr.  append,  c  68.  JSum^,  H.  ec&  Y,  2a  EpipK-  bacr.  &4  OS.  Theodord. 
Haeret  fkbl).  II«  4as. 

g)  nippolyt.  (IS  r^r  aXptfftv  No^ov  riroj.  (Ed.  Fabric.  Th.  II.  p.  Cm.)  SpipK  haer.  BT. 
TheodoraL  III,  & 

A)  Eiueb.  IL  ecc  YI,  88.  comp.  20.  JTUron,  cataL  o.  60.  comp.  Ori{j.  0pp.  Th.  lY.  pi  S9&— 
UUmann^  de  Beryllo  Boetreno.  Ilamb.  1885.  4.  comp.  Stud.  a.  Krit  1836.  P.  4  p.  lOTSss. 

0  Suseb.  H.  ecc  YII,  6.  Athana«.  £p.  de  sententia  DlonyslL  (Th.  L  p.  51dsflw)  GaUandii  Bib. 
PP.  Th.  III.  p.  495.  vol.  XIY.  App.  p.  118.  Battil  Ep.  210.  Epiph,  haer.  62.  ThtodoreL  II,  9. 
[SchUiermacher^  trand.  by  M.  Stuart,  in  BlbL  Repos.  vol  Y.  p.  265-85&  VI.  p.  1-80.] 

*)  EuUb.  U.  eoc  VII,  27-^.  EpipK  haer.  65.  A.  M<^i  N.  Coll.  Th-  VII.  P.  1.  ^  68.  2»»b8.— 
EhrlicK,  de  orroriboa  Paoli  Sam.  Lpa.  1745.  4.  J.  R  JSchtoab,  de  P.  Sam.  vita  atqne  doetr. 
Herbip.  1889. 

t)  AlKofiOi.  d«  synod.  Arim.  et  Stieao.  &  48.  (Th.  L  p.  917.)   ffUar,  d«  Bynod.  &  86b 


SECOND   PERIOD, 

FBOH  C0N8TANTINE   TO    CHABLE8   THE    6BEAT. 

§  91.     General  View, 

Heatbenism  was  now  destroyed  and  Christianity  became  the  religion  of 
the  State.  The  effort  to  attain  a  more  perfect  intelleotnal  apprehension  of 
the  doctrinea  of  the  Ohristian  system,  produced  a  great  agitation  both  of  the 
Church  and  of  the  empire.  The  Church  and  the  State  exerted  a  reciprocal 
and  mutnaDy  perrading  influence  upon  each  other,  and  by  blending  together 
the  politieal  and  dogmatic  interest,  an  unfavorable  result  was  produced  in 
both.  The  rights  of  the  congregations  wore  still  enforced  in  almost  all  in- 
itanoci  by  popular  insurrections  and  intrigues  at  court.  The  unity  of  tlie 
Chnroh  was  carried  out  by  sacrificing  the  independence  of  its  several  parts, 
tud  the  whole  became  subject  to  the  two  great  bu^hops  residing  at  old  and 
new  Rome.  The  power  of  the  monks  nearly  equalled  that  of  the  clergy. 
Grecian  and  Christian  usages  and  morals  were  blended  together,  and  mu- 
tislly  corrapted  one  another.  From  the  midst  of  these  doctrinal  conflicts, 
and  from  the  fanaticism  of  the  Desert,  a  class  of  characters  was  produced,  in 
wMeh  the  Holy  Ghost  allowed  the  spirit  of  the  times  to  attain,  on  a  grand 
mle,  the  end  for  which  it  indefinitely  longed.  At  the  close  of  this  struggle, 
the  State  was  distracted  by  another  relating  to  images.  Christianity  gave  a 
inal  ^ry,  an  internal  life  and  a  consolation  in  misfortune  to  the  Roman 
•mplref  bat  eould  not  prevent  its  overthrow.  A  now  and  simple  faith  ob- 
tdned  a  victory  over  Christianity  by  means  of  the  sword,  and  closed  against 
it  its  own  native  East.  Greece  alone  continued  Roman,  and  gradually  sunk 
with  its  Church  into  a  long  apparent  death.  The  German  nations  broke 
into  the  Western  Empire,  but  soon  bowed  themselves  before  the  croes,  and 
gtrre  to  the  Church  a  new  life.  The  period  naturally  falls  into  two  divisions 
cf  nearly  equal  length :  the  Church  of  the  Roman  empire,  to  which  the  ad- 
jacent cnriental  countries  belong,  and  the  Church  among  the  Germanic  na- 
tions, to  which  the  Roman  bishopric,  from  the  time  of  Stephen  II.,  was 
tnoiCerred. 


DIVISION  L-THE  IMPERIAL  CHURCH, 

I  92.     Original  Authorities, 

I)  Am6.  (I  li.)  Ets  rhy  $low  Kvwarturrlyov.  L  IV.  Vita  Constant,  et  FanesyrtcnB,  ed.  /TWn- 
UUi.  L|«.  188a  HUtoriae  eee.  EoaeblL  1.  IX  Bnflno  interprete  ao  IL  fpsios  RuJIni,  «<!.  Cacci- 
*i  Bom.  1741c  9  Tta.  4.  Ulatoria  eoa  Soriptoret  graacl,  a  notis  VaUsii  ed.  O,  Reading,  Cantahr. 
KNl  t  Tk.  £    yio&pkonu  CkOlUaut,  UicKne,  laropia,  ed.  Fronton  U  Due,  Par.  ICSO.  2  Tb.  f 


102  ANCIENT  CHURCH  HISTOBY.    PER.  IL    DIV.  L    A.  D.  812-800. 

2)  SiUpicii  Seteriy  Hist  sacnK  ed.  Hqfmeitter^  Tip.  170a  (Oppi  cd.  Hleron,  n  Prato^  Veron.  1741fc 
2  Th.  f.  TlacrxcUfoy  s.  Chronicon  paschale,  <kL  (7ar.  d u  Frenne  Dom,  du  Cange.  P*r.  IftSS.  £  ZtKf. 
DiN^foi:/^  Bonn.  1S82.  2  Tb.  Thtoj)hane9  Confeitior^  Xpovtyypa^ioL,  c  mAlsJroari  et  Cbmb^Jltiu 
Par.  165.\  Yen.  1729.  f.  8)  Ammianut  MareeUinua,  Reram  geet  L  XXXI.  cd.  Emetti.  Lpa.  1773w 
1885.  Zonimus,  iaropia  via,  ed.  ReiUmeier.  Lps.  1764.  /tTt.  Bekker,  Bonn.  1S37.  [Tbe  Greek 
Ecclea.  Histories  by  Eoseb.  Tbeod.  Socrat  Sozoin.  and  Evagrius,  bave  beeo  newlj  translated  and  pnb- 
lisbed,  witb  lives  of  tbe  aatbors,  in  6  vols.  8va  Lond.  1842-6.] 

Most  of  the  public  original  documents  are  contained  in  the  acts  of  conn- 
cils  and  tbe  imperial  codes.  Eutebivs  was  influenced  in  tbe  bistory  of  bis 
own  times  at  least  by  gratitude,  {a)  His  Ecclesiastical  History  was  freely 
translated,  and  continued  to  tbe  time  of  tbe  translator  by  Itvjinxts  (395).  (bi) 
Among  tbe  Greeks  it  was  continued  by  tbe  advocate,  Socrates  SchoJastieus 
(806-489),  and  Hermias  Sozorneuva  (828-428).  The  former  was  a  candid  and 
plain  writer ;  the  latter  was  full  of  monastic  notions,  and  wrote  in  a  florid 
style.  Both  were  completed  by  Theodorelvs,  bishop  of  Cyrus,  with  a  great 
abundance  of  theological  learning  (325-427).  (c)  All  of  these  were  com- 
posed in  the  spirit  of  tbe  ascendant  party  in  the  Church.  The  Ecclesiastical 
History  of  Philost^yrgius  (300-426),  is  a  panegyric  upon  the  Tanquished  par- 
ty, and  is  preserved  only  in  tbe  extracts  made  by  Photius.  Etagrius^  a  dis- 
tinguished advocato  of  Antioch,  continued  tbe  history  of  tbe  Catholic  Church 
(481-^94)  with  special  attention  to  political  circumstances,  and  an  extreme 
passion  for  orthodoxy.  Extracts  from  Socrates,  Sozomen,  and  Theodoret, 
are  preserved  in  a  manuscript  work  of  Theodorua  Lector^  and  fragments  of 
bis  continuation  of  Socrates  (until  618)  have  been  preserved  by  Kioepborus. 
Tbe  history  of  Nicephorus  CallUtius  (which  at  first  consisted  of  twenty-three 
books,  and  reached  to  the  year  911,  but  now  consists  of  only  eighteen  books, 
extending  to  the  year  610),  was  compiled  in  the  fourteenth  century  from 
older  historical  writings  and  original  documents  in  the  church  of  St.  Sophia. 
It  was  written  in  an  elegant  style,  and  its  sentiments  are  honestly  expressed, 
but  it  is  characterized  by  servility  and  superstition.  Sulpicius  Sec&nta^  at 
first  a  lawyer,  and  afterwards  a  presbyter  in  Gaul,  wrote  a  concise  simimaiy 
of  universal  history  (until  400)  with  a  strong  ecclesiastical  spirit,  but  it  is 
important  only  for  what  relates  to  bis  own  times,  and  to  events  occurring  in 
bis  own  vicinity.  The  Easter- Chronicle  (written  until  864,  under  Constan- 
tius,  but  with  later  additions  until  628,  under  Ileraclius)  is  principally  a  cal- 
culation of  tbe  passovers  from  the  beginning  of  the  world,  but  it  is  enlivened 
by  a  chronicle  in  which  many  singular  documents  and  accounts  are  communi- 
cated in  a  simple  style,  and  in  an  ecclesiastical  spirit.  Tkeophanes  Confessor 
^yrote  a  continuation  of  an  older  chronicle  down  to  bis  own  time  (285-818X 
and  with  much  learning  made  use  of  original  documents  which  would  other- 
wise bave  been  lost.  His  work  is  pervaded  by  the  spirit  of  a  monk  and  of 
a  martyr  to  bis  zeal  for  image  worship.  Among  the  last  of  the  heathen  his- 
torians, Ammianus  Marcellimis^  in  those  portions  of  bis  history  of  the  em- 
pire which  are  extant  (libb.  14-81.  858-878),  has  recorded  the  ecclesiastical 
events  of  that  period  with  the  impartiality  and  sound  common  sense  of  a  sol- 

d)  Socrat  II.  ecc  1, 1. 

b)  F.  J.  Kimmelj  de  Rof.,  Eua.  intcrprete  L  II.  Qer.  1888. 

c)  F.  A.  JToUhausin,  de  fontibQ^  qulbos  Socr.  Soz.  et  Tbeod.  osl  sont  Qoett  189Sc  4 


CHAP.  L    YICIOBT  OF  CHBISTIANITY.    S^a  CONSTANTINE  &  HIS  SONa  103 

dier,  and  Zo$imuA,  a  court  officer  under  Theodosius  II.,  has  described  (in  de- 
tail 2&1-410)  with  minute  art  the  dark  shades  in  the  character  of  the  Chris- 
tian emperors. 


CHAP.  I.— VICTORY  AJND  DEFEAT  OF  CHRISTIANITY. 

J.  G.  Bitfmann,  niii»  supentltionis  pagaoML  Yit  1788.  i,    S.  T,  JNkdiger,  de  statu  paganomm 
Mb.  Imp.  ebrist  post  Const  Ynt  182&  BeugnoL  (before  $  4t) 

§  98.     Canstantine  and  his  Sons, 

L  Wbaterer  relates  to  them  In  Etueb.  and  Zo9lmus.—lL  Martini^  d.  £1nf&hr.  d.  cbr.  BeL  als 
BlaataeL  dnrch  Constant  Manch.  ISia  i.  Matuo,  Leben  Const  BresL  1817.  Ki*t,  do  conimata- 
tkMM,  qnam  Const  aactore  socletas  cbr.  sublit  Tn\).  ad  Bh.  1818.  4  {Hug)  Denkscbr.  s.  Ehrcnrett 
Coast  (Zeltscbr.  t  d.  Oelstllcbk.  d.  Erzb.  Freybarg.  1829.  P.  8.)  Arendt,  Q.  Const  u.  s.  Yorb.  z. 
Cfaristentb.  (T&b.  Qnartabcbr.  1884.  P.  a)  [Euub,  PamphUus,  Life  of  Const  in  4  books.  Nev 
LoDd.  1845^  8.] 


As  fast  as  he  conld  wisely  do  so,  and  by  all  the  means  which  an  absolate 
monarch  can  bring  to  bear  npon  his  faYorite  plans,  Constantine  gradually  be- 
stowed upon  the  Church  security,  wealth,  privileges,  and  every  thing  which 
oonld  make  it  attractive.  By  the  arts  of  state  policy,  the  contest  be- 
tween the  rulers  of  the  Eastern  and  Western  division  of  the  empire  had 
been  identified  with  that  between  the  ancient  gods  and  the  crucified  Re- 
deemer. No  sooner  had  this  been  decided  by  the  complete  destruction  of 
Lkinius  (828),  than  Canstantine  openly  expressed  a  desire  to  see  the  whole 
Roman  world  once  more  united  in  one  common  religion.  He,  however,  free- 
ly acknowledged  the  right  of  all  those  who  desired,  to  persevere  in  their  ad- 
herence to  the  obsolete  superstition.  Only  a  few  temples  in  the  East  were 
deq»oiled,  that  their  ornaments  might  be  used  to  adorn  the  new  Christian 
Rome ;  some  others  were  destroyed  on  account  of  the  immoralities  practised 
in  them,  (a)  and  a  law  against  sacrifices  (/;)  was  probably  directed  merely 
against  such  immoralities,  or  was  never  executed.  The  emperor  still  re- 
mained Pont  if  ex  MaximuSj  and  some  of  his  enactments  indicate  that  he  hon- 
ored^ or  at  least  feared  the  magical  arts  of  the  old  paganism,  (c)  Political 
interests  seemed  imperatively  to  require  that  ChristiaiHty  should  be  estab- 
Bshed  as  the  religion  of  the  State,  that  those  religious  questions  which  were 
then  producing  innumerable  divisions  might  bo  decided.  That  Constantine, 
bowerer,  acted  in  these  measures  from  a  sincere  attachment  to  Christianity, 
k  evident  from  what  he  did  before  the  chivalrous  emperor  had  degenerated 
mto  the  tyrant,  and  from  his  interest  in  those  ecclesiastical  matters  with 
which  the  mere  policy  of  the  ruler  could  have  had  no  connection.  The 
Kme  sign  which  had  originally  given  him  the  victory  (Labarum,  812),  (d) 
bad  also  conducted  him  to  universal  dominion,  and  he  therefore  regarded 
lumseif  as  the  favorite  of  Heaven,  called  to  secure  an  equal  dominion  for  the 


a)  AiMfr.  YiU  Const  II,  6&-60. 

h)  According  to  a  reference  wbicb  Constans  made  to  It  (e)  and  Euwb.  Vita  Const  II,  45. 
e)  Coostit  de  hanupldnae  nso.  a.  821.  L.  1.    Cod.  Theod.  de  pagan.  (XVI,  10.)    Zoaim.  lU  29. 
d)  Eu90b.  YIU  Const  I,  27-81.    Laetant  de  mortib.  c  44.    Soaom.  I,  a    Rujtn,  I,  9.    Comp. 
Uaarii,  FtnegjT,  Const  c  li.—ireinich&n^  Excarai  L  ad  Yltam  Const 


104  ANCIENT  CHUBCH  HISTORY.  PER  II.  IMPERIAL  OHUBOR.  A.  D.  81»-«0dL 

orosB  of  Christ.  And  yet  he  was  not  restrained  from  desecrating  that  very 
oroas  by  hands  deeply  imbraed  in  blood,  in  the  blood  of  his  own  son  (826). 
That  he  remained  among  the  catechumens,  and  never  received  baptism  nntil 
the  year  in  which  he  died  (887),  is  accounted  for  by  a  reference  to  a  super- 
stitions opinion  then  prevalent  among  many  Christians.  Not  only  has  the 
Church  from  gratitude  conferred  upon  him  the  title  of  the  Great,  but  even 
heathenism  has  given  him  a  place  among  its  divinities.  While  acquiring  and 
maintaining  his  authority,  he  won  many  battles,  formed  a  system  of  govern- 
ment which  acted  with  all  the  regularity  of  an  artificial  machine,  built  a 
metropolis  for  the  world  in  a  position  the  most  admirable  of  any  on  earth, 
and  lived  to  experience  and  to  deserve  many  misfortunes.  In  one  respect  he 
was  certainly  great  or  fortunate,  for  when  seated  in  the  highest  position  then 
attainable,  he  seems  to  have  understood  what  the  necesedties  of  his  age  re- 
quired. His  sons  followed  out  and  even  extended  the  political  system  and 
favorite  plans  he  had  bequeathed  to  them.  The  temples  were  closed,  and 
those  who  should  venture  to  sacrifice  were  threatened  with  death,  (e)  In 
Rome  alone  an  asylum  for  the  ancestral  gods  was  allowed  to  remain,  as  a 
special  favor  solemnly  conceded  to  the  m^esty  of  the  Roman  people.  (/) 

§  94.    Juliantu  Apoatata, 

L  Juliani  0pp.  (Miaopogon,  Caeearea,  Oratlonea,  £ppw)  et  CyrilU  Alea.  e.  Jnlian.  L  X  cd.  ^^pam- 
hwi.  Lpa.  160«.  2  Tb.  £  Jul.  Epp.  Aceednnt  flragm.  breTiora,  ed.  Heeler,  Mof.  1898.  Tlie  aeriea  of 
Christian  lampoons  begins  with  Grtgorii  Jfa*.  in  Julian,  apost  invectivae  daae.  The  pagan  pane- 
gyrics with  Lihaniut^  especially  with  his  Oratio  parentalis.  A  true  and  fair  aeeonnt  In  Ammian, 
Marc,  XXL-XXV»  a 

II.  //.  P.  a  Ifenk^,  de  TheoL  Jul.  Helmst  1777.  i.  (0pp.  1802.  ^  dOSss.)  A.  Keander,  JnL  XL  s. 
Zeitaltor.  Lpa.  1812.  (ScMoMer's  Rec  in  d.  Jen.  L.  Z.  Jan.  1818.  p.  1218«l)  Idem,  [H.  of  the  Chr. 
ReL  and  Church.  toI.  II.  pp.  86-<17.]  C  If.  van  Ilencerden^  de  Jul.  rel.  chr.  hoste  eodemqne  Tin- 
dice.  Lugd.  1827.  O.  F.  Wiggert,  Jul.  d.  Abtr.  (Elgen's  Zeltschr.  1S87.  vol  VII.  p.  1.)  II.  Sehube^ 
de  phll.  et  morib.  Jul.  Btrals  1889.  4  V.  8i  Tevffiel^  de  Jul  Imp.  christianlsmi  eontemtore  et  oior*i 
Tub.  1644.  [A  short  acoonnt  of  the  Life  of  JuL  the  Ap.  Lond.  1689. 19.  Life  of  Jul  Lend.  1688.  & 
Two  Orations  of  J.  transL  Lond.  1798.  8.] 

Julian  had  heen  educated  for  the  Christian  priesthood,  hut  he  had  learned 
to  regard  Christianity  as  a  tissue  of  suhtle  formulas,  and  as  a  religion  of  sla« 
very.  The  victory  it  had  acquired  over  the  religion  of  his  ancestors  he  as- 
cribed to  the  violent  measures  of  him  who  had  heen  the  murderer  of  his 
father^s  family.  By  an  acquaintance  with  the  poets  of  antiquity  and  the 
philosophers  of  heathenism,  which  he  had  acquired  in  secret,  he  found  what 
seemed  to  him  a  higher  life.  Having  attained  the  throne  by  a  bold  use  of 
favorable  circumstances  (8G1),  he  looked  upon  himself  as  destined  by  the 
gods  to  bring  back  the  delightftil  times  of  antiquity.  His  religious  views 
were  of  the  New-Platonic  school,  and  in  his  restoration  of  paganism,  he  in- 
tended to  ingraft  upon  it  all  the  excellencies  of  Christianity.  Christians 
were  removed  fh>m  civil  offices,  condemned  to  rebuild  the  temples  which  had 
been  destroyed,  and  excluded  from  all  professorships  in  which  the  national 

e)  Constantis  Lex  adr.  aacrit  a.  841.  L.  IL  Cod,  Thsod.  de  pagan.  (XVI,  la)  OmeftinfM  Bcaer. 
ad  Taurum.  a.  808.  ibid.  L.  4. 

/)  L.  8.  Cod.  Tfisod,  de  pagan.  (XYI,  10.) 


OBAP.  L    TIOTOBT  OF  CBBI8TIANITY.    |  M.  JULIAN.    %  Vk  PAGANISM.    105 

Bteratnre  was  taag^t.  (a)  Even  the  claims  of  jnstice  were  coDoeded  in  inch 
a  wj  at  to  &vor  his  hostile  design ;  all  sects  were  tolerated,  all  banished 
Uahopa  were  reoaned,  and  the  Jews  were  invited  to  rebuild  their  sanctnary. 
Those  who  had  remained  heathen  now  began  to  lift  np  their  heads,  and  the 
6Ttr  Tenal  moltitade  retnmed  to  their  deserted  temples.  These  very  efforts, 
howerer,  merely  showed  how  well  Constantine  had  understood  the  age  in 
which  he  lived.  The  ridicule  and  hatred  of  the  Christians  Julian  met  with  the 
weapons  of  a  philosopher  rather  than  with  those  of  a  universal  ruler.  In 
his  oontroversies  with  the  Galileans,  he  endeavored  especially  to  show  that 
they  were  condemned  by  their  own  sacred  books  when  they  deified  a  de- 
Jew,  complied  with  the  new  custom  of  honoring  other  deceased  per- 
and  renounced  Judaism,  (b)  The  virtues  he  exhibited  in  his  official  duties 
procured  peace  and  esteem  even  from  those  who  personally  disliked  him,  and 
those  difiTerenoes  which  existed  between  him  and  his  people  did  not  make 
him  8  tyrant.  The  more  beautiful  traits  of  the  Greek  national  spirit  could 
DoC  be  developed  in  him,  but  he  was  nevertheless  a  hero  and  a  philosopher 
on  the  throne,  and  a  pioos  and  virtuous  man  in  private  life.  Even  his  de- 
clamatory vanity  was  connected  with  his  high  regard  for  the  free  judgment 
of  his  people.  After  a  busy  reign  of  twenty  months  as  sole  emperor,  and 
liter  a  restless  but  fhxitless  life,  he  fell  while  yet  a  youth  in  a  battle  with  the 
Ptesiaiis  (863).  Though  he  passed  away  like  a  fljdng  doud,  he  was,  with  the 
•loeption  of  Athanasius,  the  greatest  man  of  his  century. 

§  95.    Fall  of  Paganiiin. 

After  Julian,  the  empire  was  governed  by  Ohristian  emperors,  but  hea- 

tbeidsm  continued  undisturbed  in  its  civil  relations  until  the  reign  of  Theo- 

Imus  I.    This  monarch  having  conquered  the  Gotha  and  suppressed  the 

beretica,  felt  bound  also  to  persecute  the  pagans  (381).    It  was  at  this  time 

dao  that  Gratianus  had  the  altar.of  Victory  removed  from  the  hall  of  the 

Boman  senate.    It  was  in  vain  that  Symmachus,  in  the  name  of  the  senators, 

implored  that  an  altar  with  which  the  early  and  happy  recollections  of  so 

many  venerable  fathers  were  connected,  and  already  so  dear  even  to  the  ten- 

dcrast  youth,  might  be  spared.    In  vain  did  he  plead  in  the  name  of  the 

eternal  city  itself,  that  in  the  present  uncertain  condition  of  things,  the  usages 

cf  their  ancestors  might  be  respected,  and  a  religion  under  which  they  had 

eoDquered  the  world  might  not  be  exterminated,  (a)    In  the  exercise  of  his 

power  as  sole  ruler  (892),  Theodosius  prpclaimed  every  form  of  idolatry  a 

crime,  and  every  attempt  to  learn  the  secrets  of  the  future  by  animal  sacri- 

fioea,  high  treason.  (5)    Those  enthusiastic  teachers  who  relied  wholly  upon 

tbe  q)iritual  power  of  the  gospel  to  overcome  all  its  opponents,  were  out- 

unnbered  by  the  zealots  who  urged  the  emperor,  as  a  matter  of  conscience, 

«)/ULE|ii  4flL  Ammian.  Marc  XXII,  10.    OroHi,  Illit  YII,  80.    The  mtoundentanding  In 
^^m.  V,  ia    Soerai.  III«  13.    Theodoret  Hlat  eoo.  Ill,  8. 
>)lfvfila  # J  fVMU,  IMfeoM  da  piiguiiane  pw  I'Emp.  JaliAn.  B«r.  1764  ed.  &  1TS9. 
•<  Sfmmaeki  L  X  Kp.  «1.  (Ed.  /VirMM,  Neoet.  Nem.  1628.) 
^)L  11  Cod.   Th0Od.  de  pagan.  (XYI,  \(i,)^atv^fk4n,  da  Theododl  M.  in  rem  cbr.  moritU. 


106  ANCIENT  CUUBCH  HISTOBY.   FEB.  IL  IMPEBIAL  CHUBOH.  A.  D.  819-aOO. 

to  destroy  paganism  by  fire  and  sword.  The  popnlaoe  were  excited  by  tIo- 
lent  monks  to  rise  against  the  temples.  It  was  to  no  purpose  that  Libanitu 
eloquently  interceded  for  those  edifices  which  he  had  jnst  assisted  Julian  to 
embellish,  (r)  A  few  of  the  more  beaatifhl  ancient  temples  were  saved,  to  be 
converted  into  churches.  When  the  mysterious  Serapion  at  Alexandria  was 
destroyed,  and  the  statue  of  the  god  was  broken  to  pieoes,  the  Egyptians 
expected,  according  to  an  ancient  prophecy,  that  the  world  would  sink  back 
into  its  original  chaos,  (d)  Philosophy  sought  consolation  in  magical  arts, 
and  hopes  were  entertained  that  the  power  of  Christianity  was  destined  to 
extinction  during  the  year  899.  (e)  The  heathen  orades  withheld  their  re- 
sponses, and  the  Sibylline  books  were  consumed  in  the  flames.  Before  the 
middle  of  the  fifth  century,  idolatry  was  completely  exterminated  in  every 
part  of  the  Eastern  empire.  In  the  West,  where  the  continual  incursions 
of  the  barbarians  rendered  the  emperor's  authority  less  effective,  it  was  found 
impossible  wholly  to  put  down  the  worship  of  the  gods,  to  whose  vengeance 
the  devastation  of  the  empire  was  ascribed.  Hence,  after  Rome  had  been 
plundered  by  the  barbarians,  Augustine  (426)  and  Oronus  (417)  found  it  ne- 
cessary, by  labored  apologies,  to  prove  that  Christianity  was  not  responsible 
for  the  calamities  of  the  times,  the  former  taking  the  ground  that  the  whole 
history  of  the  world  was  only  a  development  of  the  kingdom  of  Christ,  con- 
ditioned by  the  opposition  of  men.  (/)  The  great  multitude  indeed  followed 
where  fortune  and  power  led  the  way,  but  Augustine  found  by  experience, 
as  Libanius  had  intimated,  that  it  was  easier  to  exclude  the  gods  from  the 
temples,  than  from  the  hearts  of  the  people,  and  that  Jesus  was  not  often 
sought  for  from  disinterested  motives,  (g)  Heathenism  maintained  its  ground 
only  here  and  there  in  some  remote  districts  (paganismus,  868),  where  it  was 
protected  by  the  rustic  simplicity  and  honesty  of  its  votaries,  in  particular 
indi\iduals  or  families  of  an  exalted  character,  and  in  the  schools  of  philoso- 
phy. A  few  philosophers  fell  a  sacrifice  to  the  frantic  zeal  of  the  Christian 
populace.  The  learned  and  amiable  Hypatia^  who  presided  over  the  New- 
Platonic  school  of  Alexandria,  was  horribly  murdered  in  a  church,  not  with- 
out guilt  on  the  part  of  Cyril  the  bishop.  (A)  Heathenism,  however,  from 
its  very  nature,  could  never  attain  ascendency  by  its  martyrdoms.  Ju§» 
tinian  L  destroyed  its  last  intellectual  hold,  by  abolishing  the  schools  of  phi- 
losophy, and  he  annihilated  even  those  secret  vestiges  of  it  in  Rome  which 
had  become  concealed  under  an  indifference  to  all  external  forms  of  wor- 
ship, {i)    Photius  alone  preferred  a  voluntary  baptism  of  blood  in  defence 


c)  Drat  ad  Tbeodos.  {nt\p  rwv  Upcov.  0pp.  ed.  Beiske,  Tb.  II.  More  complete:  Noyos  8.  Pa- 
tratn  Qraec  Saec  lY.  delectaa,  rec  Z.  de  Sinner.  Par.  1848. 

d)  Ri/^ni,  n.  eoo.  II,  22-8a    Hocrat  Y,  16. 

«)  Sotom.  YI,  8S.    Augu*Hn,  de  Civ.  Dei.  XYIII,  68. 

f)  Augtui.  de  Civitate  Del  L  XXIL  c  oomment  Jo.  L.  Vivis  et  Coquaei^  Hamb.  166S.  STh. 
J.  van  Goms,  de  Aug.  Apoli^eta  sec.  IL  de  Cir.  Del  Amst  183S.  Pauli  OroHi  ady.  Paganna  bti- 
toriar.  L.  YII.  (Ilonnceda  moodi,  Moeetltia)  rec  Siff.  Baverkamp^  Lugd.  1788b  4  Th,  de  Mommer, 
de  Oroe.  vita  ejusqae  Uist.  Iibri&  Ber.  1844 

0)  Uban.  0pp.  vol  II.  p.  177.  Attg.  Serm.  82.  in  £v.  Jo.  tr.  25, 10.  A)  Soorat.  YII,  lQi-*-ir«rfi«- 
dorf,  de  Hyp.  phlloeopba  Dsa.  lY.  Yit  174a  4.  Miknch^  Hjpatia.  (Yerm.  Scbriften.  Ladwigsb. 
1828.  vol.  I.) 

i)  Procopil^  Hist  arcana  c.  11.  Theophan,  Chronogr.  ad  ann.  522.  Comp.  Agathku  Hiit  II,  8QL 


CHAP.  L  TICTORT  OF  CHRISTIAKITT.  f  95.  MAINOTTES.  {  96.  MA3SALIANS.  107 

of  freedom,  to  a  constrained  baptism  in  behalf  of  Christianity ;  and  the 
Mainotte$^  in  their  mountain  homes,  defended  at  the  same  time  their  own 
fiberties  and  the  ancient  gods  of  Spart^  So  many  religions  phrases  and  fes- 
tiyals  connected  with  idolatry  were  preserved  at  Home,  that  it  may  more 
properly  be  said  to  have  been  incorporated  into  the  life  of  the  Church  than 
abolished.  The  last  adherents  of  the  ancient  faith  were  fonnd  in  the  seventh 
oentnry,  inhabiting  some  remote  valleys  of  the  Italian  islands. 

§  96.     Massalians  and  Ilypaiaiarians. 

L  Epiph,  loner.  80.  CtfrilL  AUat.  de  adoratione  in  spirltu  et  verit  L  III.  (Par.  Th.  I.  p.  92.) 
Grtifor.  Xas.  Orat.  XVIII.  f  5.  (0pp.  p.  888.)    Greffor.  A>m.  adv.  Eanom.  1.  II.  (Th.  II.  p.  440.) 

IL  UUmann,  de  HfpsisUriifl.  Ueidelb.  1828.  4.  On  the  other  side:  Boekmer^  de  Uype.  Praefii- 
tm  ert  Neaodcr.  BeroL  18S4.  together  with  various  replloe. 

Many  persons  had  no  confidence  in  the  ancient  gods,  who  nevertheless 
had  no  faith  in  Christ.  These  were  indifferent  about  what  might  be  the  re- 
iult  of  the  great  struggle  for  religion,  or  without  professing  adherence  to  any 
particolar  Deity,  they  contented  themselves  with  the  most  general  forms  of 
|»ety.  The  more  sincere  portion  of  this  class  longed  for  some  religions  fel- 
lowahip,  and  therefore  associated  themselves  together.  Accordingly,  the 
MamaUan9  of  Syria  and  Palestine  (Euchites,  Enphemites,  ^toaf^tU,  and  in 
Africa  Coelicolae),  conceded,  indeed,  that  there  might  be  many  gods,  but 
ictually  worshipped,  in  their  splendidly  illuminated  oratories,  at  morning 
tnd  evening  twilight,  only  One  universal  Ruler.  The  Hypsistarians  {vyltiaT<^ 
Uf  vpocKvpovyrts)  of  Cappadocia  can  be  reckoned  in  the  same  class  with 
them,  only  on  the  ground  that  both  were  worshippers  of  but  one  God,  for 
tlieir  peculiar  sentiments  respecting  the  eating  of  meats  and  the  Sabbath  in- 
dicate that  they  must  have  been  a  kind  of  proselytes  of  the  gate.  That  they 
e?er  had  any  connection  with  Parsism,  is  very  doubtful.  The  indifierence 
of  the  former  class  and  these  latter  sects  of  the  fourth  century  must  have 
disappeared,  after  a  few  generations,  before  the  internal  and  external  power 
of  Christianity. 

§  97.     Christianity  under  the  Persians, 

Christianity  made  no  very  great  progress  in  Persia,  on  account  of  the 
newly  awakened  national  spirit,  the  volatile  character  of  the  people,  and  the 
nptfficial  knowledge  then  possessed  by  Christians  of  the  Persian  system  of 
fdigion.      In  the  fourth  century,  however,  Christian  congregations  existed 
in  every  part  of  that  country  under  the  Metropolitan  of  Seleucia.    But  in 
ooQseqnence  of  the  hatred  felt  against  them  by  the  priestly  caste,  who  were 
boond  together  by  the  closest  bonds,  and  some  suspicions  of  a  political  na- 
ture awakened  against  them,  they  became  victims  of  a  persecution,  after  848, 
which  raged  almost  without  interruption  for  a  whole  century,  and  nearly  an- 
nihilated the  Church,  (a)    No  parties  bearing  the.  name  of  Christian  could 
^  an  asylum  there,  except  those  which  had  been  expelled  from  the  Roman 
ttipire.    Cho9roe4t  IL  conquered  Jerusalem  (614)  and  put  to  death  all  Chris- 
^  whom  he  fonnd  in  Palestine.    Jleradius  restored  the  holy  city  to  free- 

•)fM06.  VIU  Const  IV,  »-ia    Somm.  II,  9-14    8ocr.  VII,  19-21.     TheodoreU  V,  88.  Acto 
Ibi^  Orient  et  Oodd.  tA&K  Atmnanvt,  Boxn.  174S.  t  P.  L 


108  ANCIENT  CUUBCH  HI8T0BT.  PEU.  IL  IMPEBIAL  CHUBCH.  A.  D.  812-80a 

dom,  and  triamphantly  reinstated  the  cross  in  its  former  glory  (621-628). 
Armenia  fell  at  last  beneath  the  power  of  the  Persians  (429),  bat  its  Chri** 
tianity  was  more  heroically  defended  |han  its  freedom,  (b) 

§  98.    Ahymnia  and  the  Dia$pora, 

The  preservation  of  two  yonng  men  belonging  to  the  murdered  crew  of  a 
Grecian  vessel,  was  the  occasion  of  the  conversion  of  the  Abyssinians.  One 
of  these,  named  Frumentius,  obtained  inflnence  at  conrt,  received  episcopal 
ordination  from  the  hands  of  Athanasins  (827),  and  lived  to  see  the  whole 
nation  professing  the  Christian  faith,  (a)  Oosmaa,  the  Indian  traveller,  fonnd 
(before  535)  Christian  congregations  at  three  different  points  along  the  coast 
of  the  Eagt  Indies.  Thomas  was  honored  by  them  as  their  apostle,  but  they 
mnst  have  been  originally  composed  of  mercantile  colonies  from  Persia,  {h) 
The  existence  of  a  chnrch  at  Chnmdan,  in  China  (after  686),  with  all  that  is 
related  of  it,  is  proved  only  by  a  record  discovered  by  the  Jesuits,  (e)  Ara- 
bia was  furnished  with  an  apostle  with  many  rich  gifts  by  the  Emperor  Con- 
stantius.  But  wherever  Christianity  became  prevalent  in  that  country,  it 
was  violently  assailed  by  the  Jews.  Whole  nomadic  tribes  received  baptism 
at  once  from  the  hermits  of  the  desert,  but  probably  without  much  inquiry 
into  the  nature  of  Christianity,  or  further  practice  of  its  precepts. 

§  99.    Mohammed, 

L  Tb«  Koran :  anb.  et  Uit  ed.  Maraecim.  PaUv.  1698.  £  Petanb.  1787.  4.  FltigtL,  L^ml  (18S1) 
1841.  4  Ahul/eda^  (14th  cent)  Iltot  anteUUmlca,  arab.  et  lat  ed.  FUUcher,  Lpei  1881.  Derita 
Mahamedia,  arab.  et  lat  ed.  Oagnier,  Oxon.  1728.  f.  (The  1st  Part  of  Abnlfeda's  Ann.  MoalemH 
anb.  et  lat  ed.  BeUke^  Ilavn.  17898a.  5  Th.  4.)  Comp.  J.  r.  Hammer  in  the  Wiener  Jabrb.  188& 
▼oL  68.  Janoary,  Ac  [The  Koran;  transL  from  the  Arab,  into  EngL  by  O.  SaU.  Lond.  1889. 1841 
S  Tola.  8.  Belectiona  from  the  K.  with  an  interwoven  oomm.  transL  ttam  the  Arab,  with  notee,  etc. 
by  JST.  W.  Lans.  Load.  1844.  &] 

IL  J.  Gaffni^,  U  vie  de  Mah.  Amst  1789.  S  Th.  G.  Buth,  Life  of  Mob.  New  York.  1882.  1% 
{W.  Irring^  Mob.  and  bia  Bocceflaors.  New  York.  1853.  2  voIil  &  &  OckUy,  Hist  of  the  Saraoem, 
comprising  tlie  Uvea  of  M.  and  hia  snooessora,  &c  4  ed.  Lond.  1847.  8.  A.  Sprenger^  Life  of  Mob. 
Allahabad.  12.]— ^arc/n  cU  ToMy,  Doctrine  et  devoirs  de  la  rel.  musulmane.  Par.  1828.  Ch.  Fot-- 
gter,  Mahometanisme  unveiled.  Lond.  1629.  2  vols.  &  Dettinger,  z.  TheoL  dee  Korans.  (TQb.  Zelt- 
echr.  1881.  P.  2.)  J.  t>.  Hammer- Pur gtUiU,  Mob.  d.  Prophet  Lpa.  1887.  Comp.  Umbreit,  in  d. 
Stad.  0.  Krit  1841.  P.  1.  O.  Weil,  Mob.  de  Proph.  Stuttg.  184&  [  W.  H.  Xwle,  The  Moham.  Sys- 
tem of  Theology.  Lond.  1823.  8.]— 7VcA««fi,  quatenos  M.  aliamm  relL  sectatores  toleraveritf 
(Cmmtt  Soc.  Goett  Class.  Hist  Th.  XV.  p.  152ss.)  Mdhler,  Verb,  in  welchem  nach  d.  Koran  J.  CL 
xn  M.  steht  (T&b.  Quartalschr.  1880.  P.  1.)  A.  Geiger,  was  hat  M.  ans  dem  Jodenth.  aaf^nommanf 
Bonn.  1888.  C.  F.  Geroct,  Cbristologle  d.  Koran.  Hamb.  1889.  [IT.  Pridmua^  Nature  of  Impoatart 
in  the  Life  of  M.  Lond.  8va  H.  Martyn^  Controv.  Tracts  on  Chr.  and  MahommedanisoL  ed.  & 
Lee.  Lond.  1824  ^  J.  R  White,  Comparison  of  Moham.  and  Chr.  Bampton  Lectt  Lond.  Sw  W.  T. 
Thompton,  Pract  Phil,  of  the  Mohammedans,  transL  from  the  Per.  of  Jany  MuK  Aedad,  Lond. 
1889.  a    Art  in  BUtto's  Jonmal  of  BibL  Lit  vol  L] 

The  Arabians  were  a  free,  warlike,  and  imaj^native  people,  sub«sting 


h)  Elieaeue,  Htatory  of  Vartan,  transl.  by  Veumann.  Lond.  188a  4  p.  12sa.  Saint  MarUtk 
(I  68.  note  d.)  Th.  L  p.  SOftasi  Th.  IL  p.  472sa. 

a)  Rti/tn.  I,  9,^JoH  Ludoljt  Hist  Aethiopica.  Fro£  1881.  t  III,  S.  and  Cmtr.  ad  H.  Aeth.  IK 
1891.  t  p.  588aa. 

h)  Coemas,  Toiroyptupia  xp^aricufiK'h.  iMm^faueon^  Colleetio  nova  PP.  graaa  Par.  17(Hk  £  Th, 
IL)  L.  IIL  p.  173.  L  XL  p.  886.  comp^  PhUoetcrg.  Ill,  14, 

c)  KiroheH  China  illustrata.  Bum.  1687.  f.  p.  4imk 


CHAP.  L    YIGTOBT  OF  OHRISTIANITT.    f  90.  MOHAMMED.  109 

iqKm  their  flocks,  and  with  only  a  few  oommercial  towns.    With  no  literary 
oaltiTatlon,  they  took  great  delight  in  a  poetic  language.    From  the  most 
ancient  times,  the  Caaha  at  Mecca,  originally  consecrated  to  the  worship  of 
the  one  God,  had  heen  the  national  sanctuary,  bnt  more  recently  each  tribe  had 
posMssed  a  deity  for  itself.    Judaism,  Christianity,  and  Parsism,  had  severally 
fimnd  entrance  into  Arabia,  and  it  was  not  nncommon  for  them  to  be  com- 
bined or  exchanged  the  one  for  the  other.    Mohamjned  (b.  571)  belonged  to 
the  race  of  Ishmael,  the  tribe  of  the  Eoreish,  and  the  family  of  Hashem, 
whose  bosiness  it  was  by  inheritance  to  take  charge  of  the  Caaba.    He  was 
originally  a  merchant  and  a  herdsman,  of  a  qniet  temperament,  with  very 
Bttle  indication  of  his  fntnre  character,  though  frequently  lost  in  religious 
rsTeries.    All  at  once  he  began  (611)  to  proclaim :  ^^  There  is  no  God  but 
God,  and  Mohammed  is  his  prophet.''    On  this  fundamental  principle  was 
eoDStmcted  a  system  of  faith  and  morals,  which  combined  together  the  four 
forms  of  religion  prevalent  among  his  people.    Mohammed  was  acquainted 
with  these  only  as  he  had  found  them  in  his  intercourse  with  men — Judaism 
ia  its  Talmudic,  and  the  life  of  Jesus  in  its  apocryphal  form.    His  professed 
elject  was  to  re-establish  the  religion  of  Abraham,  the  great  ancestor  of  his 
aition ;  and  as  he  regarded  Judaism  and  Christianity  as  divine  revelations, 
he  in  the  Koran  honored  their  founders  with  legends  of  their  miracles.    His 
opinion  respecting  what  he  called  tlie  later  corruptions  of  these  systems,  be- 
eune  gradually  more  intolerant,  and  was  aggravated  with  respect  to  the 
Jews  by  motives  of  personal  hatred.    It  became  still  more  developed,  as  he 
advanced  beyond  the  idea  of  a  national  toward  that  of  a  universal  religion — 
IB  Idam^  without  which  there  was  no  salvation.    His  system  of  religious 
etibics  demanded  stated  seasons  and  forms  of  prayer,  fastings  and  ablutions, 
alfl^giTing,  a  pilgrimage  to  Mecca,  an  earnest  contention  for  the  faith,  and  a 
wiDingness  to  die  in  its  behalf.    A  confidence  in  the  doctrine  of  an  absolute 
Iiredestination,  raised  the  courage  of  a  brave  people  by  inducing  them  joy- 
foHy  to  surrender  themselves  to  the  will  of  the  Almighty.    He  prohibited 
Im  followers  the  use  of  wine,  but  indemnified  them  by  an  unrestrained 
«Dowanoe  of  sexual  pleasures.    The  prospect  of  sensual  enjoyments  in  an- 
tUier  world  gave  the  finishing  stroke  to  this  system,  and  adapted  it  solely  to 
Bum's  sensuous  and  intellectual  nature.    He  then  presented  it  to  his  fellow- 
men  with  all  the  peremptoriness  of  a  direct  revelation  from  heaven,  and  in 
lU  the  fSmcifVil  richness  of  the  popular  poetry.    Few  in  his  native  city  were 
disposed  to  put  confidence  in  his  messages,  and  he  was  even  obliged  to  escape 
tlM  swords  of  his  fellow-citizens  by  flying  (July  15th,  622,  Hedschra)  to  Me- 
fina.    By  bold  predatory  expeditions  from  this  place,  he  conquered  a  part 
of  Arabia,  and  the  remaining  portion  was  convinced  by  his  success  that  he 
Vtt  indeed  an  apostle  of  God.    His  personal  appearance  was  remarkably  pre- 
ponenng ;  he  was  eloquent,  enthusiastic  in  piety,  as  well  as  artful  in  policy, 
lobold  in  his  measures  that  he  even  resorted  to  assassination  to  effect  them, 
T^  ordinarily  just  and  magnanimous  enough  to  be  esteemed  by  an  adoring 
P^ple  as  a  messenger  fi*om  God.    In  his  private  life  he  was  faithful,  sincere, 
nd  temperate,  though  addicted  to  women.    When  first  called  of  God  to  his 
v<>k,  he  could  neither  read  nor  write ;  his  travels  could  have  given  no  great 


110  ANCIENT  CHURCH  III9T0EY.  PER.  IL  IMPERIAL  CHURCH.  A.  D.  8l8-80a 

information,  and  most  of  what  he  knew  he  had  acquired  at  Mecca,  to  which 
pilgrims  resorted  from  the  whole  oriental  world.  He  professed  to  receive  his 
revelations,  as  occasion  called  for  them,  from  the  lips  of  the  angel  Gahriel, 
in  inspired  language,  though  in  the  day  of  his  prosperity  they  were  not  with- 
out a  remarkable  adaptation  to  his  desires.  They  were  preserved  sometimes 
in  popular  tradition,  and  sometimes  in  detached  manuscript  fragments,  until 
two  years  after  his  death,  when  they  were  collected  as  holy  scriptures  (Al- 
koran)  by  Ahuhehr,  This  prophet,  poet,  priest  and  king  of  Arabia,  died  (682) 
in  the  midst  of  his  plans  of  conquest,  from  the  effects  of  a  slow  poison  given 
him  to  test  his  prophetic  powers. 

§  100.     Victories  of  Islam, 

OeUner,  des  effeta  de  la  rel.  de  Moh.  pendant  les  trois  prem.  b16c1m.  Pit.  1810.  Hit  Zna.  dM 
Vert  ▼.  R  D.  M.  FrkC  1810.  J.  J.  Dmingtr,  Mab.  Rel  nach  ihrer  EniwlckL  n.  ihrom  EinfluML 
MOnch.  1888. 

To  his  successors  the  Caliphs^  Mohammed  left  the  assurance  that  God  had 
given  them  the  world  to  be  conquered  for  Islam.  This  system  had  even  then, 
in  its  various  sects,  been  developed  in  some  splendid  forms  of  life.  The  Ro- 
man empire  had  become  debased  by  effeminacy,  and  the  oriental  Church  was 
split  up  into  factions.  But  a  religious  enthusiasm  which  has  seized  the 
sword,  cannot  be  overcome,  at  least  by  ordinary  armies,  and  Christianity  had 
hitherto  been  far  from  cultivating  the  military  virtues.  The  Arabians  suc- 
cessively conquered  Egypt  and  Syria  before  640,  Persia  before  C51,  and  the 
African  provinces  before  707.  With  extreme  difficulty  Constantinople  with- 
stood the  storm.  The  conditions  on  which  the  patriarch  Sophronius  had  sur- 
rendered Jerusalem  (687),  were  generally  complied  with  by  the  Saracens,  so 
far  as  they  referred  to  the  Christian  population.  Christians  were  tolerated 
in  the  exercise  of  their  religion  on  the  payment  of  a  poll-tax,  but  many  of 
them  renounced  their  faith,  and  followed  the  fortune  of  their  conquerora. 
Mohammed  defended  Jesus  from  the  attempts  of  Christians  to  deify  him,  and, 
according  to  a  prevalent  tradition,  Christ  is  at  his  second  advent  to  become 
the  last  Caliph.  The  efforts  of  the  Christian  apologists  were  confined  princi- 
pally to  a  defence  of  the  divinity  of  Christ,  and  of  the  doctrine  that  God 
could  not  be  the  author  of  evil.  The  only  reply  of  the  Mussulmen  was  with 
their  swords. 


CHAP.  II.— THEOLOGY  AND  SCIENCE. 

§  101.     Conflicts  ajid  Sources  of  Ecclesiastical  Life, 

As  the  various  parties  became  developed  within  the  Church,  the  latter 
was  necessarily  urged  to  a  more  precise  determination  of  the  essential  arti- 
cles of  its  faith.  The  unity  of  the  Church,  which  had  been  externally  estab- 
lished, operated  unfavorably  to  an  unrestrained  diversity  of  opinions.  No 
sooner  had  the  common  external  enemies  of  the  Church  been  overcome,  than 
its  consciousness  of  essential  unity  became  so  obscured  by  the  rancor  of  indi- 
vidual parties,  that  not  only  elements  foreign  to  Chrisdanity,  but  some  of 


CHAP.  IL    DOCTRINE,    f  101.  CONFLICTS,  SOURCES.  1 1 1 

the  mere  modes  in  which  real  Christianitj  was  received,  wore  rejected  bj  the 
Church.  Indeed  it  was  for  a  long  time  uncertain  which  of  the  parties  in 
this  contest  would  prove  to  be  the  Catholic  Church.  The  passions  of  the 
people  and  of  the  government  were  enlisted  in  the  conflict.  The  natural  de- 
vdopment  of  the  ecclesiastical  spirit  was  determined  by  mechanical  minori- 
ties and  imperial  decisions.  The  Oriental  Church  endeavored  to  fathom  the 
mystery  of  the  divine,  while  the  Western  attempted  rather  to  explore  the 
abyss  of  the  human  nature.  The  whole  literature  of  the  Church  was  in- 
vdved  in  these  theological  disputes,  which  became,  especially  in  the  East, 
central  objects  in  the  history  not  merely  of  the  Church,  but  of  the  empire. 
Tradition  and  the  Scriptures  were  as  usual  regarded  as  the  standard  of  au- 
thority, but  while  individuals  sought  salvation  only  in  the  word  of  God,  the 
firing  voice  and  opinion  of  the  Church  became  in  practice  more  and  more  in- 
ihiential.  Vineentius  of  Lirinum  (d.  about  450)  proposed  that  the  tradition 
which  oonld  plead  in  its  behalf  the  established  usage  of  the  primitive  Church 
and  nniversal  consent  as  the  conditions  of  its  proper  organic  progress,  in  op- 
position to  all  heretical  innovations  and  ecclesiastical  rigidity,  should  be 
ngarded  as  the  warrant  and  the  standard  of  the  true  faith,  (a)  Those  por- 
tioDs  of  the  sacred  writings  which  had  been  subjects  of  suspicion  at  an  early 
period,  were  still  opposed  by  many  in  the  time  of  Eusebius.  (b)  But  the 
nity  of  the  Church  rendered  it  indispensable  that  all  portions  should 
be  agreed  respecting  its  sacred  writings,  and  accordingly  near  the  close  of  the 
loorih  century  the  disputed  books  were  almost  universally  received.  We 
have,  however,  no  well  authenticated  law  on  the  subject  of  the  canon,  with 
the  exception  of  a  decree  passed  by  an  African  synod,  which  seems  to  have 
been  adopted  in  other  countries  as  a  part  of  the  common  law  of  the  Church. 
Yarions  translations  were  in  use  among  the  Latin  portions  of  the  Church ; 
one  of  these,  the  Itala^  used  at  Rome,  was,  at  the  request  of  the  Bishop  Da- 
iDisna,  amended  by  Jerome^  and  in  connection  with  a  version  of  the  received 
text  of  the  Old  Testament,  maintained  its  position  and  found  acceptance  in 
ipite  of  much  opposition. 

L  TuE  Asian  Controvebst. 

L  1>  Rcapecting  some  fhigiiiQnts  of  the  writings  of  AHm  :  Fabricii  Bibl  gr.  Th.  Y III  p.  8(HK 
«p^  Epi  ad  Eoaebi.  Nlcom.  (in  Epiph.  haer.  69,  6.  Theodoret,  II.  ecc.  I,  &.)  £p.  tu\  Alexandr.  A 
fricin.  from  the  0cL\«ia  (In  Athan.  d.  Synod.  Arim.  et  Selene  0pp.  Tb.  I.  p.  885.^)  PMU>at4irffiut 
({K.)  FnemenU  Arlanor.  abont  SSd.  (Anff.  Mn)i  N.  Coll  Rom.  1S28.  Th.  III.)  2)  Partaking  the 
leatof  a  p«rtiaan  character:  AfkanaHvu,  EumMus^  and  Socrates.  A  partisan  troatisc:  EpipK. 
htcr. ».  7S.  73& 

IL  Walek,  HM.  d.  Ketzereien.  vol.  II.  III.  Dravasa,  Storla  critlca  della  vita  di  Aria  Von.  1746. 
{Stork)  Yen.  e.  Oeseh.  d.  Arianlsm.  BrL  1733.  Mohler^  Athan.  d.  Oroese  u.  d.  Kirche  seiner  Zeit 
M^Bi  Vm. «  Tolst  L.  Lanff^.  In  Hlgens  Zeltschr.  19S4».  vol.  IV.  pt  «.  vol.  V.  pt  1.—  Wets^r,  Resti- 
Mo  Tfne  cbrooolofp.  remm  ex  oontrov.  ArJanls  inde  ab  a.  825  osqne  ad  a.  850  exortarum.  Frcf.  1827. 
^/.  6.  Baur,  d.  chr.  L.  v.  d.  Dreieinigk.  u.  Menschw.  Oottcs.  Tub.  1841.  Th.  L  p.  8068&  G.  A. 
^%  L  V.  d.  Trin.  voL  L  pi.  lS4aSw    J.  A.  Domer^  Entwicklungsgesch.  d.  L.  v.  d.  PcrH)n  Chr.  in  d. 

■)  Commonitorlam  pro  cath.  fldei  antiqaitato  et  aniversitate  adv.  pro&nas  omnium  hacr.  novi- 
^  I>ni«o  ed.  HlBraoff.  Yrat  1889. 
i)R.MCL  III,  a.  VI,  S5:  SfioXoyo^fitra,  irriKtySfitpa,  y6^ 


1 12  ANCIENT  CHUBCn  HI5T0BY.  PER.  IL  IMPERIAL  CnUBCH.  A.  D.  81S-80a 

enten  4  Jahrh.  ISIS.  Part  IL  [J.  IT.  yrtoman^  The  ArUms  of  the  4th  cent  Lond.  1S8S.  &  J.  TF^tt- 
aker^  H\tX.  of  Arianlsm  disclosed.  Lond.  1791.  8.  W.  Berrlmann^  Aa  hist  Account  of  controveniM 
on  the  Trinity,  in  8  sonnons.  Lend.  172.\] 

§102.     The  Synod  of  Xieaea.    826.     Cant,  from  i  90. 

I.  EuMfK  V\Ul  Const  III,  6«.  The  Creed :  TTieodoret,  L  12.  Socrat  I,  &  Respecting  its  oom- 
position :  Eiuteh,  Caesar.  Ep.  sd  Caenriensea.  Atkanat,  Ep.  de  decretis  sjm.  Nlc.  Jk  Ep.  ad  Afroa 
G^laHi  Cyzioeni  (about  476)  'X(>¥Ta'yfia  rSav  Karh,  r^t^  iv  Kiicaiq.  aylaif  <rv¥otov  irpaxBtyrmw, 
{ManH  Th.  II.  p.  750sa.)    [Landon^  Manual  of  councils.  Xicaea.  pp.  480-33.] 

XL  F.  G.  Ifntt^encamp^  Hist  Arianae  controv.  ab  initio  usque  ad  syn.  Nicacnam.  Marb.  1SI& — 
Ittig.  Hist  Cone  Nic.  Lpe.  1712L  A.—M&n»cher,  Q.  d.  Sinn  d.  nic.  Olaubensformel.  (Ilenkes  N.  Mag. 
ToL  VI.  p.  88488.)  EiMMchmidty  d.  Unfcblbark.  d.  Cone,  zn  Nicfia.  Neust  1S80.  [J.  Kay^  Atban*- 
sius  &  the  Council  of  Nice.  Lond.  1S58.  8.  W.  A.  Ifammond,  Definitions  of  faith  4e  oaaons  of  DIml 
of  the  6  oecumenical  councils,  &  eode  of  the  nniver.  Church,  and  apost  oanonn  Lond.  1848L  Ne«r 
Tork.  1844. 12.] 

The  contradiction  involved  in  the  idea  of  a  Grod  existing  at  the  same  time 
with  another,  or  of  a  God  pubordinate  to  another,  was  yet  to  be  declared  and 
overcome.  Arius^  a  presbyter  of  Alexandria,  maintained  that  the  Son  was 
at  some  period  created  out  of  nothing  by  the  divine  will,  that  he  was  the 
first  of  all  creatures,  and  the  Creator  of  the  world,  that  he  was  endowed  with 
the  highest  natural  gifts  in  the  highest  state  of  development,  and  that  he  wai 
not  truly  God,  though  he  might  be  so  called.  Arius  had  been  educated  at 
Antioch,  was  eloquent  in  prose  and  verse,  a  skilfid  logician,  though  not  biased 
by  any  predominant  intellectual  tendency,  and  a  rigid  ascetic  in  his  habits  of 
life.  Proceeding  from  the  ground  of  the  ordinary  doctrine  of  the  Church, 
he  attempted  to  find  some  clear  idea  which  should  at  once  be  consistent  with 
Monotheism,  and  opposed  to  Sabellianism.  His  Bishop  Alexander^  produced 
in  opposition  to  his  views  (after  818)  the  other  side  of  Origen's  doctrine,  ao- 
cording  to  which  the  Logos  was  from  eternity  begotten  fi'om  the  essence  of 
the  Father,  and  was  consequently  equal  to  the  Father.  At  a  synod  held  at 
Alexandria  (321),  Arius  was  deposed  and  excommunicated.  But  the  pe(^)le 
and  many  of  the  oriental  bishops  attached  themselves  to  his  party ;  mAiij 
perhaps,  like  Eusebius  of  Nicomedia,  not  so  much  because  they  shared  in  hit 
sentiments,  as  because  they  looked  upon  them  as  harmless,  and  others,  like 
Eusebias  of  Caesarea,  because  they  regarded  such  subjects  as  lying  beyond 
the  bounds  of  human  knowledge  or  of  divine  revelation.  The  emperor  Con- 
itantine^  having  made  many  fruitless  efibrts  to  induce  the  parties  to  give  up 
what  then  seemed  to  him  a  useless  controversy,  summoned  a  general  assem- 
bly of  bishops  at  Nicaea,  principally  for  the  settlement  of  this  question* 
Hore  than  250  bishops,  almost  exclusively  from  the  East,  came  together. 
Both  Arius  and  Alexander  were  in  a  minority,  since  most  of  the  bishops 
dreaded  in  the  former  an  exaggerated  system  of  subordination,  and  in  the 
latter  a  covert  Sabellianism,  or  an  open  Tritheism.  But  Alexander's  friemdfli 
through  the  influence  of  the  court  bishop,  Jffosiui  of  Cord<kta^  induced  the 
emperor  to  embrace  their  cause,  and  dictated  the  decision  on  matters  of  faith. 
The  only  embarrassment  which  they  experienced  arose  A*om  the  readmess 
with  which  the  Arians  subscribed  all  their  articles,  until  the  expression  as- 
serting that  the  Son  was  of  the  same  essence  with  the  Father  (t^  varpi  Sfiocv 
<rios)  was  proposed  and  Fleeted,  and  became  henceforth  the  watchword  of  the 


CnAP.  IL    D0CTB1N£.    f  102.  ABIAKISM,  NICA£A.    f  108.  ATHANASIU&     113 

new  orthodoxy.  Most  of  the  opposing  hishops,  out  of  reverence  for  the 
imperial  authority,  or  for  the  sake  of  peace,  on  finding  that  it  could  he  inter- 
preted so  as  to  harmonize  with  their  views,  gave  in  their  suhscription  to  this 
creed.  Arius  was  hanished  to  lUyria,  and  was  accompanied  hy  only  two 
Egyptian  hishops.  Three  months  afterwards,  Eusehius  of  Nicomedia^  who 
bad  promptly  snhecrihed  not  only  the  creed  hut  the  condemnation  of  Arius, 
was  compelled  to  share  his  fate.  The  Emperor  commanded  that  all  the  writ- 
ings of  Arius  should  he  humed ;  all  who  would  not  surrender  his  works  were 
threatened  with  death,  and  his  followers  were  to  he  regarded  as  the  enemies 
of  Christianity.  It  was  for  this  reason  that  the  latter  were  sometimes  called 
Pitrphyrians. 

§  103.    Athananus  and  Arius, 

A  controversy  thus  decided  hy  the  mere  authority  of  an  incompetent  and 
unstable  sovereign  was  sure  speedily  to  be  renewed.    Athancudus  five  months 
afterwards  was  made  Metropolitan  of  Alexandria,  and  became  the  leader  of 
tite  Nicaean  party,  which  even  when  a  deacon  he  had  completely  governed  at 
Hkaea.    By  his  enemies  he  has  been  described  as  a  tyrant ;  by  the  emperors 
he  was  sometimes  persecuted,  sometimes  honored,  and  always  feared ;  and  by 
the  Egyptians  he  was  beloved  as  a  friend  of  the  people,  and  venerated  as  a 
wdL     Daring  twenty  of  the  forty-six  years  which  he  spent  in  the  episcopal 
office  he  was  a  fugitive  for  his  life,  or  in  banishment.    His  life  was  often  pre- 
MTved  through  the  fidelity  of  his  friends,  who  were  ready  to  die  for  him.   The 
great  object  of  his  life  was  to  contend  for  the  divine  dignity  of  Ohrist,  and 
in  this  for  all  that  was  essential  to  Christianity,  in  opposition  to  a  new  hea- 
thenism, (a)    The  Arians  regarded  themselves  as  the  special  advocates  of  the 
dirine  unity,  and  an  intelligible  form  of  thought.    Constantine  finally  recurred 
to  his  earlier  view  of  the  uselessness  of  this  controversy,  and  was  satisfied 
with  a  creed  drawn  up  by  Arius  in  the  most  general  terms  (828).    At  a  synod 
convened  at  Tyre  (335)  Athanosius  was  deposed  and  banished  to  Gaul.   Arius 
died  on  the  very  day  in  which  he  went  in  solemn  procession  from  the  impe- 
rial palace  to  the  church  of  the  apostles  (336),  according  to  his  enemies  the 
Tiethn  of  a  divine  judgment,  but  according  to  his  friends  poisoned  by  magical 
tits,  (b)    Eusehius  of  Nicomedia^  after  338  Bishop  of  Con8tantino[)le,  again 
hecame  the  leader  of  the  party  which  had  been  the  true  minority  at  Nicuca, 
nd  taught  that  the  Logos  was  from  eternity  begotten  of  the  substance  of  the 
Ftther,  and  was  similar  in  nature  {6yioiovai,oi)  but  subordinate  to  the  Father. 
Ting  party,  then  called  the  Eusehian^  and  at  a  later  period  the  Semiurian^ 
embraced  those  who  had  been  known  as  Arians,  and  had  the  complete  ascend- 
ency in  the  East,  {e)  but  the  West  had  been  gained  over  by  the  personal 
energy  and  presence  of  Athanasius.    An  attempt  was  made  to  reconcile  both 
portions  of  the  imperial  Church  at  a  synod  convened  at  Sardica  (347),  but  so 

•)  CoUeetlons  fbr  a  blographj  of  Athanaslns  may  be  found  in  the  edit  of  his  works  by  Mon^u- 
OM»nd  in  TUUnumt,  Tb.  YIII.  MIMUr  (b«f.  %  102.) 

))  StaraL  I,  8S.  Soaotn,  I,  S9a.  Honorable  k  trae ;  A1hana9,  £p.  ad  Scrap.  (0pp.  Th.  I.  p.  670sfl.) 
^I|>iMc.Aeg.eCLSbiS19. 

e)  £ipc  at  the  Sjmods  of  Antlocb,  841,  and  Ancjra,  85S.    Athan.  de  8}'nodi8  $  22as.    Soerat  II, 

^  fyipk.hux.n. 
8 


I 


114  ANCIENT  CHUBCU  HI8T0BY.  PER.  IL  IMPERIAL  CHURCH.  A.  D.  8ia-90a 

nnsQccessfhl  was  it  that  the  two  parties  came  to  a  complete  rnptnre  with  each 
other,  and  the  oriental  held  distinct  sessions  in  the  neighboring  city  of  Philips 
popolis.  Comtantius  was  compelled  to  restore  Athanasins  to  the  see  of  Alex- 
andria by  a  threat  of  war  from  his  brother,  bnt  as  soon  as  he  became  the 
sole  ruler  of  the  empire  (358)  he  had  the  cathedral  of  Alexandria  taken  by 
storm,  and  endeavored  also  to  eradicate  the  Nicaenn  faith  ft'om  the  Western 
portions  of  the  Ohnrch.  The  occidental  churches  were  compelled  to  condenm 
Athanasins  and  accept  of  a  Semiarian  creed  at  synods  held  at  Arelate  (858), 
at  Mediolanum  (855),  and  at  Ariminum  (859).  After  these  triumphs  a 
schism  in  the  dominant  party  became  developed  subsequently  tcnthe  second 
synod  of  Sirmium  (357),  in  the  contentions  between  the  Eusebians  and  the 
decided  Arians.  Among  the  leaders  whose  names  they  bore,  Acacius^  Bishop 
of  Caesarea  endeavored  at  first  to  conceal  this  schism,  by  refusing  to  ac- 
knowledge any  of  the  controverted  articles,  on  the  ground  that  they  were 
unscriptural,  (d)  but  Aetiiis  and  Eunomius^  in  accordance  with  the  assertion 
that  the  divine  nature  could  be  as  easily  understood  as  the  human,  carried 
out  the  views  of  Arius  with  greater  acuteness  and  logical  consistency,  and 
denied  that  Christ  possessed  any  divine  nature  (aM$fio(or,  'Ami/ioioi).  {e)  Afteit 
the  death  of  Constantius  (361)  the  Athanasian  party  attained  once  more  its 
natural  strength  in  the  West.  In  the  £ast  Valens  (364-78)  was  so  fnrions 
agiunst  it  that  ho  spared  not  even  the  Semiarians.  The  result  was  that  the 
latter  adopted  views  much  nearer  those  of  the  Athanasian  party  (after  866.) 
The  struggles  of  these  various  parties  were  maintained  quite  as  much  by  the 
weapons  of  court  intrigue  and  insurrection  as  by  proofs  derived  from  the 
Scriptures,  from  tradition,  and  from  logic.  Synods  were  arrayed  against 
synods,  and  force  was  opposed  to  force.  Athanasins,  whose  last  years  had 
been  spent  in  peace  among  his  own  people,  died  about  873,  while  the  conflict 
was  yet  unabated. 

§  104.    Minor  Controter$ies. 

1.  MarceUtis^  Bishop  of  Ancyra,  and  a  leader  of  the  Nicaean  party,  repre- 
sented the  Logos  as  the  eternal  wisdom  of  God,  which  became  the  only  begotten 
Son  of  God  first  at  the  Incarnation,  and  after  the  day  of  judgment  will  onoe 
more  become  one  with  the  Deity.  Fhotinus^  Bishop  of  Sirmium,  regarded  the 
man  Jesus  as  the  Son  of  God,  only  as  far  as  he  was  ordained  to  bring  the  di- 
vine kingdom  to  its  complete  realization,  and  as  he  was  filled  by  the  Spirit 
and  was  a  power  of  God.  The  deposition  of  Marcellus  (336)  was  regarded 
in  the  West  as  a  martyrdom  for  the  Athanasian  cause.  The  doctrine  of  Pho- 
tinus  was  condemned  by  the  Eusebians  at  Antieeh  (after  845),  and  he  was 
himself  deposed  at  Sirmium  (about  851),  but  even  the  Athanasian  party 
hastened  to  relieve  themselves  of  the  reproach  of  his  opinions  by  a  r^eotion 
of  them  at  the  Synod  of  Mediolanum  (847).  (a) 


d)  PMlostorff.  IV,  12.    Soerat  II,  40.    Sotom.  IV,  88. 

0)  PhiXontorg.  HI,  16-17.  EpipK  baer.  IfL—Philoelorg.  VI,  1-4.  VaUHut  tA  SoeraL  Y,  10. 
Jfabricii  Bibl.  gr.  Th.  YIII.  p.  2688&— C  B,  W.  Klo9€j  Qesch.  o.  Lehre  des  Eonom.  Kiel  168a. 

a)  Fragtnenta,  esp.  ircpl  6iroTayqt.  Marcelllmiui  ed.  Jl,  O.  Rettberg^  OoeCt  1794.  Agidml  bkn: 
Ku9^.  Ccus.  Karh.  Mopx^XAov  and  ircpl  Trjs  iKK\iiataffruais  ^coX.  (both  after  Mtutib,  JH* 


CHAP.  IL  DOCTRINE,   f  104  MACEDONIANS,    f  105.  Ist  8YN.  OF  C0N8TPLR  115 

2.  The  doctrine  of  the  Holy  Spirit  from  its  very  nature  necessarily  par- 
ticipated in  the  fortune  of  that  of  the  Logos,  bnt  as  no  ecclesiastical  party 
was  formed  with  the  special  object  of  developing  it,  it  remained  in  an  indefi- 
nite state.  When  the  Ensebians  changed  their  ground,  bat  retained  the  8e- 
miarian  doctrine  respecting  the  Spirit,  Athananus  perceived  the  necessity  of 
midntaining  his  equality  with  the  Son,  and  gave  to  those  who  opposed  his  views 
the  appellation  of  (after  862)  fighters  agiunst  the  Holy  Ghost  (7rv€viiaT6fiaxoi) ; 
but  when  Macedonius  of  Constantinople  became  a  leader  of  the  Semiarians, 
they  were  called  Macedonians,  The  views  of  the  Church  however  still  re- 
mained unsettled,  and  many  learned  men  looked  upon  the  Spirit  as  an  opera- 
tioD  of  €k>d,  others  as  a  creature,  others  as  God,  while  others  still  from  defe- 
rence for  the  Scriptures,  formed  no  conclusion  on  the  subject,  (b) 

8.  The  more  distinctly  the  divine  nature  of  Christ  was  recognized,  the 
lets  were  men  willing  to  regard  the  humanity  in  connection  with  it  as  pro- 
perly represented  by  a  sensuousr  nature.  When  therefore  Apollinaris^  Bishop 
of  Laodicea,  a  philosopher  who  had  been  classically  educated,  and  was 
ttien  a  friend  of  Athanasius,  distinctly  proposed  (after  862)  the  opinion  which 
had  extensively  prevailed  in  the  primitive  Church,  but  which  was  then  prin- 
dpaDy  favored  by  the  Arians,  that  the  Logos  connected  himself  only  with  a 
human  body  and  an  animal  soul,  with  which  he  sustained  the  same  relation 
as  was  ordinarily  borne  by  the  human  spirit  (vovr))  he  met  with  opposition  in 
many  ways,  (e) 

§  105.     The  Synod  of  Constantinople  and  the  Holy  Trinity, 

The  Emperor  Theodositte  /.,  who  had  been  educated  in  the  Nicaean  creed, 
daring  bis  protracted  and  powerful  reign  triumphantly  accomplished  what 
had  long  been  the  consistent  effort  of  the  Church.  He  first  proclaimed  that 
Done  but  those  who  received  the  Nicaean  creed  should  bear  the  name  of 
Catholic  Christians,  and  denounced  their  opponents  as  deluded  and  base  here- 
ticB,  who  must  ultimately  endure  the  divine  as  they  would  speedily  the  im- 
perial indignation,  (a)  But  when  he  entered  Constantinople  (880)  he  found 
Gregory  of  Ifazianzen^  the  bishop  of  the  Nicaean  party,  preaching  in  a  con- 
Tcntide  belonging  to  the  suburbs  of  the  city.  This  bishop  he  brought  at  the 
head  of  his  legions  into  the  Church  of  the  Apostles,  and  drove  the  Arians  out 
<€  all  the  churches  of  the  East.  To  legalize  these  violent  proceedings  a  coun- 
dl  was  called  together  atConetantinople  (881.)  {b)  This  second  genend  synod 


•▼.  Vnr.  Ua.  t)  CyHlU  ITierot.  Cat.  XV,  27-88.  For  him :  AtAaiu  ApoL  c  Arian,  f  21-«5. 
i:  Epiph,  bMT.  72—AtAan.  do  BynodL%  {  268.  Soerat  11,19.  Ifleron.  catal  c.  107.— ATose, 
Qach.  0.  Lehra  d.  lUre.  n.  Phot  Uamb.  1S87. 

h)  Ba$H,  Ep.  118.  Athan. :  ad  Pallad.  (Th.  L  p.  952.)  ad  Serapioa.  (Th.  I.  p.  166^8.)  Fpipk.  haer. 
*V   Grtffor.  JfoM.  (8S0)  Orat  87.  Oomp.  UUmann^  Greg.  p.  878sa. 

«)  FngoMots  of  ApolUnaris  In :  Gregor.  JfyM. ;  Theodortt  haer.  &bb.  IV,  8.  &,  iMmtitts  BijtanL 
^'  ftm/La,  AponoDarlatarum  L  IL  (Oallandll  BlbL  Th.  XII,  p.  70688.)  Principal  work  in  oppcK^i- 
^:  Or^ffor,  Jfi/m.  K6yQt  iurrifprrriKhs  wphs  rk  'AwoWtyaplov.  {OaUandii  Bibl  Th. 
^pc517«.) 

•)  L 1  Cod,  ThMd,  de  fide  cath.  (XVI,  1.) 

h)  MomH  Th.  IIL  p.  G818&  Rii^tu  II,  20.  Soerat,  Y,  6fi8.  Thsodoret»  Y,  Ta^.—UUmann,  Oregor. 
^•»^L^lftfc>.Sh#fc^l^Th0od.p.l4^8^. 


116  ANCIENT  CUUBCn  HISTORY.    PER.  IL  IMPERIAL  CHUROH.  A.  D.  813-800. 

having  been  diminished  by  the  withdrawal  of  the  Macedonians,  consisted  of 
150  bishops  chosen  under  the  arbitrary  dictation  of  the  emperor.  The  Ni- 
caean  creed  was  revised  and  clothed  in  such  terms  as  had  become  established 
during  the  more  recent  controversies,  and  in  this  new  form  was  confirme<l  by 
them.  The  Eunomians,  Macedonians  and  Apollinarians  were  condemned  as 
heretics,  (c)  The  Arians  were  tolerated  in  the  West  under  Valentinian  II., 
until  TheodosiuB  obtained  their  suppression  as  the  price  of  his  assistance 
against  the  usurper  Maximus  (888).  With  the  fifth  century  they  completely 
disappeared  in  all  parts  of  the  Roman  empire.  The  synodal  edicts  of  the  vic- 
torious party  declared  that  the  Son  and  Spirit  were  co-equal  with  the  Father 
in  the  divine  Unity.  In  the  tlieological  discussions  held  from  the  time  of 
Athanasius  to  that  of  Augustine,  the  views  of  all  parties  were  gradually  so 
accommodated  and  carried  out,  that  the  contents  of  the  apostolic  creed  were 
exalted  to  the  speculative  idea  of  the  Trinity  consisting  of  three  divine  per- 
sons in  the  unity  of  the  divine  nature.  In  this  form  the  doctrine  was  pro- 
claimed as  a  theological  mystery.  The  article  which  declared  that  the  Spirit 
proceeded  also  from  the  Son  (filioquc),  was  generally  adopted  in  the  Western 
Church,  and  at  a  synod  of  Toledo  (589)  it  was  incorporated  in  the  confession 
of  faith.  It  was  not  very  diflfercnt  from  what  had  been  vaguely  taught  by 
the  Greek  ecclesiastical  writers  of  the  fourth  century,  but  it  did  not  awaken 
attention  and  opposition  among  the  Greek  churches  as  an  interpolation  in  the 
Nicaean  creed,  until  some  time  in  the  eighth  century,  (d)  In  the  creed  bear- 
ing the  name  of  Athanasius,  which  has  generally  been  received  in  the  West 
since  the  seventh  century,  and  has  evident  marks  of  the  character  of  the  Latin 
Church  of  the  fifth  century,  the  doctrine  of  the  Trinity  is  expressly  set  forth, 
and  its  reception  is  made  a  condition  of  salvation,  {e) 

§  106.    Ecclesiastical  Literature, 

With  the  exception  of  the  cloister  and  the  desert  the  most  celebrated 
sehool  for  the  education  of  the  teachers  of  the  Church  was  at  Athens,  (a) 
A  few  of  these  might  have  taken  a  high  rank  among  sophists  and  rhetoricians, 
but  in  consequence  of  the  serious  character  of  Christianity  they  became  ec- 
clesiastical fathers.  They  regarded  their  classical  attainments  generally  with 
mingled  sentiments.  The  twilight  of  ancient  poesy  even  then  cast  a  lingering 
radiance  over  the  Church.  When  Julian  excluded  all  Christians  from  the 
schools  of  ancient  literature,  the  two  Apollinarii  hastened  to  resolve  the  con- 
tents of  the  Scriptures  into  a  series  of  epics,  tragedies,  and  Platonic  dia- 
logues, {b)  Prudentius  (d.  about  405)  in  the  evening  of  his  political  life, 
that  he  might  do  something  for  eternity,  wrote  some  songs  adapted  to  his 
times  and  to  the  conflicts  and  triumphs  of  the  Church,  but  exhibiting  less 


c)  Suioeri  Symb.  Nioaeno-Gonst  ezpoBitam.  Tri^'  ad  Rh.  171&  4. 

d)  Augustin.  de  Trin.  lY,  SO.  Cone  ToUi,  symb.  h  can.  2.  {yfanM  Th.  IX.  p.  981.)  EusA. 
de  eoc.  TbeoL  III,  4.  EpipK  Ancor.  §  9.  (Th.  IL  p.  14>— JT  O.  WalcK,  Uist  controy.  de  prooeaia  Sp. 
B.  Jen.  1761.    Ziegler,  Geschichtsentw.  t.  dogma  v.  IL  G.  (Th<K>L  Abh.  Gott  179L  toL  L  p.  S04i8.) 

«)  Waterland,  Grit  Uist  of  the  Athan.  creed.  Camb.  (1724.)  1723. 

a)  Archly,  t  Oesch.  by  ScMosser  4*  Berchi^  183S.  vol  L  p.  2178s. 

b)  Soerat  III,  1^  So&am,  Y,  18.  probably  thence  Xpiffr6t  ird<rx«y« 


CHAP.  IL    DOCTBINE.    S106l  BCHOOUS  OF  ALEXANDRIA  k  ANTIOGU.       1 17 

poetical  than  rhetorical  character,  (c)  Two  schools,  sitDated  the  one  at  Alex- 
andria and  the  other  at  Antioch,  were  especially  remarkahle  for  the  different 
manner  in  which  they  treated  the  Scriptures.  In  the  former  prevailed  an  al- 
legorical system  of  interpretation  and  a  hold  spirit  of  speculation,  hoth  of 
which  had  heen  exemplified  in  Origen,  though  his  peculiarities  were  in  some 
instances  exchanged  for  what  was  common  in  the  Church,  and  in  others  were 
abandoned.  In  the  latter,  the  simple  signification  of  the  words  vas  more  par- 
ticularly investigated,  the  circumstances  of  the  original  writers  and  speakers 
were  hetter  appreciated,  the  divine  was  more  carefully  distinguislied  from 
the  human,  and  a  merely  formal  use  was  made  of  philosophy,  and  this  more 
after  the  method  of  Aristotle,  (d)  I.  From  the  Alexandrian  school  proceeded 
thoee  who  represented  the  theology  of  their  century :  Athanasius,  a  didactic 
rather  than  an  exegetical  writer,  who  ingeniously  and  enthusiastically  reduced 
an  Christianity  to  the  simple  doctrine  of  the  divinity  of  Christ ;  (e)  and  the 
three  Cappadocians,  Gregory  of  KysM  (d.  ahout  894),  who,  next  to  Origen, 
was  most  distinguished  for  his  scientific  profundity  and  originality,  (/)  his 
brother,  Basil  the  Great^  Metropolitan  of  Caesarea  (d.  379),  equally  zealous 
for  science  and  monasticism,  hut  more  remarkable  for  his  talents  in  the  ad- 
nunistration  of  ecclesiastical  affairs,  {g)  and  the  abused  friend  of  his  youth, 
Gregory  of  Naziamin  (6  3f  oXoyor,  d.  890),  by  inclination  and  fortune  so  tossed 
between  the  tranquillity  of  a  contemplative  life  and  the  storms  of  ecclesiasti- 
cal government,  that  he  had  no  satisfaction  in  either,  neither  a  profound 
thinker  nor  a  poet,  hut  according  to  the  aspirations  of  his  youth  an  orator, 
frequently  pompous  and  dry,  but  laboring  as  powerfully  for  the  triumph  of 
orthodoxy  as  for  genuine  practical  Christianity.  (A)  Next  to  those  were  Eu- 
iebiiu  of  Caesarea  (d.  840),  whose  simple  but  not  artless  style  was  like  that 
of  one  whose  knowledge  was  abundant,  who  was  fond  of  peace,  and  disin- 


e)  Opp.  ed.  HeintiuM.  AmsteL  1667. 12.  Oellarius^  Hal.  n(i3.—.Vid(Uldorp/,  do  Prud.  et  Theo- 
W^  Pnid.  ISSSsB.  2  P.  (lUgcns  Zeitschr.  1832.  toI  IL  part  2.  Abb.  &)  For  otber  references  see 
JKt«i'«  Leben  Jeso.  p.  SSw 

i)  M^nUr^  d.  Antloch.  Scbale.  (Stiadlins  a.  Tzwhlmcrs  Arch.  vol.  I.  P.  1.) 
«)  lib  writliifs  were  oeeai^oned  by  his  circumstances.  Ttiey  were  partly  controversial  in  behalf 
flf  Cbrlstlviltj',  the  Niceno  faith  and  himself  personally,  and  partly  dnvotional  for  the  promotion  of 
smitftldsin.  Opp.  td.  R  d4  Montfnuc<m^  Par.  16S9sflL  8  Tti.  t  Giwttiniani,  Patav.  et  Lps.  1777. 
iTh.  1  [HIa  select  treatises  afainst  the  Arlans  in  two  voI\  and  his  Historical  Tracts  In  one  vol.  have 
been  pabL  in  the  "  Lib.  of  the  Fathers  anterior  to  the  division  of  the  East  &  West"  transl.  by  mcm- 
btnef  the  EogL  Church.  O.xon.  ISdO.— His  orations  were  transl.  by  Parker.  Lond  1718.  8.] 

fS  A^09  KarTix'n'''*f^f  ^  fx^yas.  Polemical  writings  against  Eanomius  &  ApoIIinariss  Homilies 
ft  Aic«tic  tracts.  Opp.  ed.  JforelliuA,  Par.  1615.  2  Th.  Append,  add.  Gretser,  Par.  16IS.  Benedic- 
Um  ed.  (Par.  1780.  Th.  I.)  interrupted  by  the  Revolution.  Lately  found  and  relating  to  the  Arians  A 
3U«4  in  A.  Maji  Sen.  yett.  ColL  Bom.  1S84.  Th.  VIIL— .SL  P.  Ueyns,  de  Or.  Nyssw  Lugd.  K 
1U3l  1    /.  Supp.  Greg.  v.  N.  Leben  u.  Mcinungen.  Lps.  1934. 

g)  Apdnst  Eunomlna,  on  the  Holy  Spirit,  Homilies  &  Letters.  Opp.  ed.  Fronto  DucaeuM,  Par. 
Wli  JTh.  £  Gamitr,  Par.  1721s8.  rep.  L.  de  Sinner,  Par.  1889at  8  Th.-J.  E.  FeUaer,  de  vita  Hasw 
^raolBf.  192&  AToM*,  Baa.  d.  G.  Strals.  1885.  A.  Jahniu*^  Baa.  M  plotinizans.  Bern.  1833  4.  Ani- 
>adrr.  In  Baa.  opp.  Bern.  1S49.  Fasc  L  [On  Solitude,  transL  by  BarktdaU,  Lond.  1675.  8.  A  Scl. 
fmt^trom  BadL  Lond.  1810.  9.] 

A>  ApolofclM  for  his  offlc'al  errors,  Eccles.  discourses  of  all  kinds,  Epistle^  Poem\  Opp.  ed.  Morel- 
t'wc  Pit.  1«0.  «  Th.  t  CUmencft^  Par.  177S.  Th.  I.  CaUlaii,  Par.  1940.  2  Th.  t  [His  Panegyric  on 
^(Mnbees is  transL  by  Collier.  Lond.  1716.  B.]^UUmann^  Greg.  v.  Naz.  DnrmsL  1825.  [Transl.  into 
^  by  0.  V.  Coac^  Lond.  1851.] 


1 18  ANCIENT  CHURCH  lUSTOBT.  P£B.  IL  IMPEBIAL  CHURCH.  A.  D.  Zl^^Ofk 

dined  to  tlie  new  formulae  of  orthodoxy,  {{)  and  the  blind  Didymus  (d.  895), 
in  spirit  and  in  fact  the  last  faithfnl  follower  of  Origen.  Qc)  In  the  Latin 
Ohnrch  were :  Hilarius^  Bishop  of  Pcnctiers  (PictaTium,  d.  868),  in  his  ac- 
tions, sufferings  and  writings,  the  Athanasios  of  the  West ;  (Q  Amhro&ius, 
Archbishop  of  Milan  (374-97),  a  zealous  praefect  eyen  in  the  Church,  for 
whose  freedom  and  orthodoxy  he  contended,  fearing  the  Lord  of  all  more 
than  the  sovereign  of  this  world,  and  more  influential  by  his  simplifying  imi- 
tations of  Greek  models  than  by  any  thing  original  in  his  works,  (rn)  11.  Zu- 
eianus,  a  presbyter  of  Antioch,  whose  Scriptural  learning  acquired  additional 
honor  by  his  death  (311),  is  generally  regarded  as  the  founder  of  the  Antioch- 
ian  school.  Eusehius^  Bishop  of  Emisa  (d.  860),  whose  classical  attainments 
and  eloquence  were  acknowledged  even  by  his  opponents,  was  a  Semiarian 
only  so  for  as  he  defended  the  indefinite  terms  of  the  primitive  creed  as  more 
scriptural  in  doctrine  than  the  later  speculations,  (n)  Cyrilliu^  with  various 
changes  of  fortune  (850-86),  was  Bishop  of  Jerusalem  and  a  Eusebian,  but  he 
obtained  the  honor  of  canonization  in  consequence  of  his  acknowledgment  of 
the  Nieaean  creed,  though  he  never  used  it  in  his  popular  instructions,  (p) 
Ephrem  (d.  at  Edessa  about  378)  became  the  principal  instructor  of  the  Sy- 
rian Church  (propheta  Syrorum),  by  transplanting  into  it  the  Greek  learn- 
ing, (p)  JDiodorus,  Bishop  of  Tarsus  (878 — about  94),  and  Theodonis,  Bishop 
of  Mopsuestia  (893-i28),  both  of  whom  had  been  at  an  earlier  period  pres- 
byters at  Antioch,  developed  the  peculiarities  of  their  school  in  the  most  de- 

t)  Tlatrro^av^  IffTopioy  Chronicon  ed.  Iforua.  Amst  1659w  t  completed  firom  the  Armenian ;  ed. 
by  Aucher,  Ven.  1818. 2  Th.  4.  in  Greek  A  Lat  ed.  A.  MaJM.  (Scrr.  veterum.  Col.  Th.  VIIL)  Ilpoira* 
paaictv^  fvayy(\iK'fif  1-  XV,  cd.  Vlg^rus,  Par.  162a  t  ITeinieKen^  Lps.  18428.  2  Th.  OaUford^ 
Oxon.  1843.  4  vols.  *AT<{8ci{ir  tvayy,  I  XX.  (I.-X.)  c  n.  Montacutii,  Par.  1828.  C  (The  parts  de- 
fective in  the  1st  &  liHh  B.  are  completed  in  FahricH  Deleetns  ai|r.  et  sjllabus  Mrlptt)  CommenL 
on  the  Psnlms  &,  I&aiah.  Comp.  FahricH  Bibl.  Gr.  Th.  VII.  p.  8866a.  J.  RiUer^  Eos.  de  dlvinltate  a 
placita.  Bon.  1828. 

k)  L.  de  Spiritu  S.  in  the  transL  of  Jerome.  (0pp.  Th.  IV.  P.  I.)  L.  adv.  ManlchaeoSw  (Comb*:fUii 
Auctuar.  gr.  I'P.  Tli.  II.)  L.  III.  de  Trinltate.  (ed.  MingareUi,  Bonon.  1769.  £)  Exposltio  YIL  eanooi- 
caram  £pp. ;  the  transL  of  which  was  procured  by  Cawiodoru^  through  Epiphaniut  ScholatL  and 
the  orig.  text  of  whicl^  LQcke  has  partially  restored  by  means  of  Matthaei's  Scboliae :  Quaeationea  ao 
vindioiae  Didymianae.  GOtt  1629-82.  4  P.  comp.  Com.  0.  Br.  d.  Job.  p.  2999&  D.  «.  CMn^  Did.  to 
Ersch.  u.  Grub.  £nc  vol.  XXIV. 

t)  De  Trinltate  1.  XII.  L.  ad  Ck>nstantinara.  De  synodls  adv.  Arlanoe.  De  synodts  Arimtneasi  at 
Seleucensi.  Comment  on  Psalms  dc  Matth.  Opp.  ed.  Bonedictt  (Constant)  Par.  169&  Afq^W,  Veron. 
1780.  2  Th.  t  OberthUr,  Wire  1785sfl.  4  Th.  A.  Maji  Scrr.  veterum  CoL  Th.  VL 

m)  Hexaemeron.  De  oflicito  1.  IIL  De  fide  L  V.  De  S.  Spirita  L  III,  92.  Episties.  Opp.  ed.  B«i«- 
dictt  Par.  1686-9^1  2  Th.  t  Gilbert,  Lp&  18898.  2  V.—F.  Bokringer,  die  K.  a.  ibreSSeogen  o.  KGesch. 
in  Biograpbien.  Zur.  1845.  vol  I.  pt  8.  [Ambrose's  Christian  0£Bces  have  been  transL  by  Homphrayi^ 
Lond.  1687.  4] 

n)  riieron.  cataL  c.  91.  comp.  119.  Soorat.  II,  9.  Soaam,  III,  ^^Euseb.  Opnscc  (8  Discoorsea 
A  exeget  &  dngni.  foments)  ed.  Auffutti,  Elbert  1829.  Evidence  that  the  Dteconrses  belmig  to  a 
certain  Kiiscb.  of  Alex,  of  the  4th  or  6th  cent  A  Information  req;>ecting  the  genuine  writings:  7%Ua. 
(L  d.  Schrr.  d.  Eus.  v.  Alex.  n.  des  Eus.  v.  Em.  Hal  1882. 

o)  Catecheses  (about  847.)  Opp.  rec  Tbuttee,  Par.  172a  Ven.  1768s.— Cdtfn,  Cyr.  in  Ersch.  xl  Gro- 
bers  Encykl.  vol.  XXII.  p.  1483&  J.  J,  f>an  VoUenhoven,  de  Cyr.  Hier.  catecbesib.  AmaL  1887.  [SL 
Cyril '«  Lectures,  8  cd.  In  Lib.  of  the  Fathers.    See  note  e.] 

p)  Comment  on  the  O.  T.,  Devotional  treatises,  Homilies,  Hymns.  Opp.  td.J.&  Afeman.  Som. 
178238.  6  Th.  f.  Auserw.  Schrr.  uebcrs.  v.  P.  Zingerl^  Insbr.  18808&  5  vols.— <Z  a  L&ngsrke:  d« 
Ephroemo  So.  S.  interprete.  Hal.  1823.  4  Do  Ephr.  arte  hermeneatica.  Begiom.  1881.  [Ji  AtuUben, 
Lib.  d.  Eph.  Syr.  Lpa.  1868.  8.] 


CHAP.  IL    DOCTRINEL    |106L  THEODORE  OF  MOPS.    {107.  BTNE8.  EPIPH.  119 

cided  fonn.  The  first  was  destitnte  of  olassioal  edacation,  and  the  last  inter- 
preted the  Old  Testament  withont  an  acqoaintanoe  with  the  Hebrew ;  bnt  by 
his  bold  separation  of  the  human  element  in  the  writings  of  inspired  men, 
in  oipposition  to  the  common  views  of  the  Ohurch,  he  incurred  the  suspicion 
and  finally  the  oondenmation  of  the  Greek  Ohorch,  though  in  the  more  re- 
mote East  he  has  always  been  honored  as  the  Interpreter,  (q)  Arius  was  a 
pupil  of  Luoianus,  and  indeed  most  of  the  Eusebians  were  educated  in  the 
Antiochian  school.  But  as  even  this  school  could  not  have  sprung  up  with- 
out the  influence  of  Origen,  to  whom  the  Arians  no  leas  than  tbo  Athanasians 
ippealed,  the  opposition  of  the  two  schools  was  principally  of  a  scientific 
diaracter,  and  produced  no  suspicion  in  the  Church  until  the  dose  of  the 
firarth  century.  It  was  a  conflict  between  the  allegorical  and  the  historical 
method  of  interpretation,  between  ecclesiastical  philosophy  and  ecclesiastical 
biblical  theology. 

IT.  Thb  Obigenistio  Gontbovbbst. 

§  107.    Synedus^  Epiphanius  and  Eieronymu%. 

Those  doctrines  which  had  been  left  undetermined  by  the  Apostles'  Creed 
tod  the  various  ecclesiastical  controversies,  were  freely  agitated  in  many  ways 
ts  late  as  the  close  of  the  fourth  oentury.  (a)  Synesius^  a  faithful  disciple  of 
Hypatia,  was  made  Bishop  of  Ptolemais  (410*81),  notwithstanding  the  reluc- 
tance with  which  he  resigned  the  leisure  of  a  private  life,  and  his  open  avowal 
that  his  philosophical  opinions  were  inconsistent  with  tlie  popular  faith,  (b) 
In  consequence,  however,  of  the  exclusive  respect  then  paid  to  ecclesiastical 
orthodoxy  and  an  ascetic  life,  a  strong  party  was  gradually  formed  in  oppo- 
•itkm  to  OrigOD,  or  rather  to  the  free  theological  investigation  occasioned  by 
the  cultivation  of  Grecian  learning.  At  the  head  of  this  party  stood  Epipha- 
fut/«  of  Palestine,  the  perfect  model  of  a  monkish  saint.  In  the  year  867  ho 
was  mode  Bishop  of  Constantia  in  the  island  of  Cyprus,  where  he  died  in 
408.  {e)  In  a  not  altogether  pure  narrative  of  events  which  he  professes  to  have 
taken  place  in  his  day,  and  in  his  work  against  the  heretics,  he  has  brought  a 
confused  mass  of  historical  knowledge  into  the  service  of  a  passionate  but 
pioas  zeaL  {d)  Having  in  these  works  placed  Origen  in  the  list  of  heretics,  {e) 
he  demanded  of  the  leaders  of  the  Alexandrian  school  in  Palestine,  John, 

i)  Hltnm.  eaUL  e.  119.  Bocrat  YI,  8.  A  catalogne  of  the  writings  of  DiodoniA  (principally  lost 
nytt):  Amaiuini  BibL  orient  Tb.  IIL  P.  L  p.  2S.—A.  Mnjo:  N.  Coll.  Rom.  1833.  vol.  YI.  p.  las. 
SpfeB.  BoouD.  Eom.  1840.  Th.  lY.  p.  499bs.  Tbeodori  quae  snpersunt  omnia  e^  A.  F.  a  Wegn^rn^ 
TK  L  Ownmtr.  in  proph«tM  YII.  Ber.  1884.—/*.  X.  Si^eri,  Thcod.  Mop.^  VeteriA  T.  «(obrie  interpre- 
tea  fiadez.  B«gloiii.  1827.  0.  FridoL  FritMche,  de  Tb.  M.  viU  et  scriptis.  UaL  1880. 

a)  Compu  JTitron,  prooem,  in  L  XYIIL  in  Esaiam. 

()  0pp.  cd.  PetatiuM,  Par.  (1612)  1640.  t  C.  Thilo,  Ck>mmtr.  In  &yn.  hymnnm  IL  v.  1-24.  IlaL 
IStti  [Select  Pooma  of  Sfn.  transl.  by  IT.  S.  Boyd.  Lond.  1814.  S]— Je/n.  77k  Clausen,  de  Syn. 
PUIciopha  Llbja«  pentapi  MetropoUta.  Uarn.  1831. 

e)  JBpipK  hMT.  51,  80. 

^  IlcD^ior,  adv.  ba«reaea,  prefixed  to  the  'AyicvpunSst  de  fido  scrmo.  0pp.  ed.  Pctavias.  Par. 
UAIHl  £  Camp,  ffisron,  cataL  c.  lU  SoeraL  YI,  10. 18.  Sotom.  M,  82.  YII.  27.  VIII,  14s. 

<)  Haer.  44.  Of  ft  almUar  character:  (7.  If.  £,  LommatMch,  de  origine  et  progressu  hacrusLs  Orl- 
mvm.  Lpa.  1846L  P.  L  4 


120  ANCIENT  CHURCH  HISTOET.  PER.  IL  IMPERIAL  CHURCH.  A.  D.  81S-800L 

Bishop  of  Jerusalem,  Hieronymns,  and  Rnfinns,  that  they  should  snstain  his 
opinion  (894).  Eieronymus  (Jerome)  of  Stridon  (about  831-420),  after  many 
conflicts  in  the  world  and  in  the  desert,  presided  over  a  company  of  hermits 
and  pions  Roman  ladies  at  Bethlehem.  In  a  dream  he  was  once  jvermitted 
to  choose  whether  he  would  become  a  Ciceronian  or  a  Christian.  He  then 
abjured  all  worldly  literature,  though  he  never  seems  to  have  taken  the  vow 
in  a  very  rigid  sense.  His  spirit  was  active,  his  knowledge  extensive,  his 
policy  worldly,  and  his  enthusiasm  intense  for  all  that  was  then  esteemed  for 
sanctity.  Though  destitute  of  profound  thought  or  feeling,  he  was  the  means 
of  introducing  Greek-ecclesiastical  and  Hebrew  learning  into  the  Western 
portion  of  the  Church.  In  his  exposition  of  the  Scriptures,  the  Alexandrian 
tendency  was  predominant,  but  the  Antiochian  interpreters  were  consulted, 
and  all  kinds  of  sentiments  are  rapidly  and  cautiously,  learnedly  and  conve- 
niently thrown  together.  (/)  At  one  time  Origen  was  extolled  above  all 
human  authors,  and  the  suspicions  which  many  entertained  respecting  him 
were  imputed  to  a  malignant  jealousy  of  his  reputation,  {g)  but  it  was  charac- 
teristic of  a  nature  like  that  of  Ilieronymus,  afterwards  to  abandon  him. 
This  produced  a  rupture  between  Ilieronymus  and  Kufinus,  in  consequence 
of  which  their  characters  are  utterly  blackened  in  each  other's  writings.  (A) 
Rvfinus  withdrew  to  Aquileia  (d.  410),  where  he  endeavored  to  spread  the 
fame  of  Origen  in  the  West  by  translations  from  his  works,  and  to  save  these 
from  imputations  of  heresy  by  alterations  of  them,  (i) 

§  108.     Chrysastom, 

I.  0pp.  ed.  A  d0  Mon^auc<m  ;  Par.  ITIS-^  18  Th.  f.  rep.  Par.  1884-^.  18  Tb.  4.  Comp.  Fabrictt 
Bibl.  Th.  YIIL  p.  454AS.  [Most  of  the  Ilomillos  on  the  N.  T.  aro  trans].  &  pobl.  in  the  Lib.  of  the 
Fathprs,  see  $  100,  note  «.  His  treatise  on  Compunction  Is  transl.  h  publ.  by  Ven^r.  Lond.  ITSS.  8L 
and  that  on  the  Prlcnthood,  by  Bunee,  Lond.  1759.  B.'\—PaU<idii  Kpisc.  Ilclenopollt  Dial  de  Tlta 
Ja  Chrys.  ed.  Bigot,  Par.  1680.  4.  and  In  Mon^aucon,  Th.  XIII.  Socrat  VI,  8-18.  SoKom.  VIII, 
7-20.    Writings  of  Hieron.  ^  Theophil.  In  IHer.  0pp.  VaUaraty  Th.  I.  Ep.  86aa. 

IL  Stilting,  de  8.  Chrya  (Acta  Sanct  Sept  Th.  IV.  p.  iOlss.)  A.  Ketmder,  d.  h.  Joh.  ChrysL  «. 
d.  Klrche  bes.  des  Orientea  In  dossen  Zeftn  BrL  (18218.)  18828&  2  toIs.  [Joh.  Chrys.  &  the  Oriental 
Church  In  his  times,  fh>m  the  Germ,  of  Ncander,  by  StapMon^  Lond.  1588.  8.]  Bokring«r,  d.  K.  n. 
Ihre  Zeogen.  vol.  L  Abth.  8.    [Art  In  Kitto's  Journal  of  BibL  Lit  vol  I.] 

Most  of  the  Egyptian  monks  in  their  controversies  with  the  followers  of 
Origen  residing  among  them,  described  God  as  a  pure  spirit,  and  could  form 
no  conception  of  Him  who  made  man  after  his  own  image  except  in  a  hn- 

/)  Coromentarie^  Literary  history,  Chronolo(;y,  Histories  of  saints,  Satires,  EplsUes,  &ol  0pp.  ad. 
ErasmuM,  Has.  15168a.  »  Th.  f  &  oft  Mttrtianay,  Par.  1698s8.  6  Th.  f.  TdUarti,  Ver.  1784ss.  11  Th. 
4  Yen.  176668. 11  Th.  4.  [Sel  Epp.  of  Jerome,  transl  Into  Engl  Lond.  1680.  4.  Epistle  to  Nepotian 
transl  Lond.  1715.  8.]— For  him.  Martlanay,  la  viode  8.  Jerome.  Par.  1706.  4  Stilting,  de  8.  Hler. 
(Acta Sanct  Sept  Tb.  VIIL  p.  4188s.)  Against  him:  deriens,  Quaestt  Uieronymianae.  Amst  1700. 
Of  hJm :  EngeUtofi,  Uieron.  llavn.  1797.    D.  v.  C6Un,  Hler.  in  Ersch.  n.  Qmb.  Encykl  Sect  IL 

vol  vni. 

g)  Jlieron.  0pp.  vol  IV.  Th.  II.  p.  68.  480.— Ep.  67.  ad  Theopli. 

h)  Jlieron,  E[)p.  8S-41.  Rujin,  Praet  ad  Orig.  de  princ  &  Apol  S.  Invectivamm  In  Iller.  I  IL 
nitron.  Apol  adv.  KuC  I  IL  dc  (a  rejoinder  to  Rnfln's  lost  answer)  Responsio  n  Apol  I  III. 

0  Tf/rannii  Rufini  0pp.  ed.  VaUarai,  Ver.  1745.  f.  Th.  I.— Mar.  de  RuhtU,  Monument*  Boo. 
Aqnil<^en8is.  Argent  1740.  £  pi  SOss.  h  de  Ru/lno.  Yen.  17U.  K.  J,  U.  MamttUni,  de  Turannii  Buf. 
fide  ot  rcl  Patr.  1835.  Cacciari  Ac  KimtneL  ($  92.  note  b.) 


CHAP.  U.    DOCTRINE.    |10&  THE0PHILU8.    CHRT80ST0B1  121 

man  form  (anthropomorphites).     Theophilus^  the  crafty  and  violent  Bishop 
of  Alexandria  (885-412),  who  had  heen  an  admirer  of  Origen,  suddenly 
became  convinced  that  he  was  a  heretic  in  consequence  of  some  offences 
received  ft-om  the  followers  of  that  teacher,  and  some  throats  from  the  An- 
thropomorphites, whose  fanaticism  he  wished  to  render  subservient  to  his 
purposes.    He  passed  sentence  of  condemnation  upon  the  memory  of  Origen 
(899),  and  was  sustained  in  his  decision  by  the  Roman  Church,  (a)    Those  of 
the  monks  who  favored  Origen  were  much  abused  by  him,  but  found  a  pro- 
tector In  John,  Bishop  of  Constantinople,  called  in  subsequent  ages  Chryaos- 
(am.    Contrary  to  the  wishes  of  Theophilus,  as  well  as  his  own,  he  was  taken 
from  Antioch,  and  (after  898)  presided  over  the  church  at  Constantinople. 
Theophilus  was  summoned  by  the  Emperor  to  the  capital,  where,  after  be- 
eoming  thoroughly  acquainted  with  the  state  of  affairs,  he  contrived  to  ob- 
tun  the  position  of  judge  instead  of  defendant.     Chrysastom,  with  sincere 
Christian  earnestness,  had  carried  out  the  intelligent  method  of  Scriptural 
interpretation  pursued  in  the  school  of  Antioch,  and  the  rhetorical  principles 
of  libanins,  and  had  exemplified  in  his  own  life,  as  far  as  was  possible  for 
any  man,  the  ideal  of  the  priesthood,  which  in  his  youthful  fervor  ho  had  de- 
nribed.  (b)    His  habits  were  strictly  monastic,  he  was  poor  with  respect  to 
himself,  but  rich  in  his  benefhctions  to  the  poor,  and  mild  in  disposition,  but 
terribly  eloquent  in  opposition  to  all  courtly  extravagances.    By  the  Empress 
Eodoxia  and  her  dependants  such  a  man  was  soon  doomed  to  destruction. 
At  the  synod  of  77ie  Oah  (408),  after  many  confused  and  absurd  accusations, 
Theophilos  pronounced  against  him  a  sentence  of  deposition  and  banish- 
ment.   The  lamentations  and  threats  of  the  people  wore  powerful  enough  to 
effect  his  speedy  recall,  but  the  Empress,  like  a  modem  Herodias,  finally  suc- 
ceeded in  having  him  banished  to  Pontus.  (404)    Innocent  I.  pleaded  his  in- 
nocence in  vain.  (<;)    Praising  God  for  all  that  had  taken  place,  he  died  in 
extreme  distress  (Sept.  14,  407).    The  body  of  the  saint  was  brought  back  to 
Constantinople  (488)  in  a  triumphal  procession,  {d)    The  goodness  of  Chry- 
eostom  was  highly  honored  by  an  age  which  forgot  and  misunderstood  the 
ip^did  talents  of  Origen. 

III.  The  Pelagian  Controvebsy. 

L  1)  Tht  polemical  writings  of  Augu*tiM:  0pp.  Tb.  X.  e<ld.  BcnedictL   JTieron.  Epp.  48.  ad 

CtatpbonUm.  Dlall.  adr.  Peltgianm  1.  III.  (Th.  IV.  P.  II.)  Oroaii  AiK)lopetIcus  contra.  Pel.    Ao- 

coaat<tf  th«  eontroveray  in  Pa]e9tine.  415.  (0pp.  cd.  Ilaverkamp,  Lupd.  173vS.  4.)   Jfurius  Jferattor^ 

C«iiaMDitorla.  429.  431.  (0pp.  ed.  BaluM.  Par.  16S4.)    2)  Frn^mente  of  Pelagim  &,  CoeUttius  may 

W  fiNDid  in  tbeM  polemical  writings,  and  some  treatiaes  of  Pelnglus  havo  been  prcwrved  becaoso 

^  were  mistaken  tor  works  of  Ifieronymns.    Before  the  controversy :  Expo^ltt,  in  Epp.  Paullnaa 

iHlff.  OpfK  Th.  V.  pi  9iSm.)    In  the  time  of  the  controversy:  Ep.  ad  Demetriadem  (cd.  Semler,  Hal. 

^"1.)  4  UbelL  fldei  ad  Innoe.  I.  (Hler.  Opp.  Th.  V.  p.  IHm.)    Fragmonfc^  of  the  iK)lem.  treatises  of 

JiHanmM  of  Eclanum  in  Aogustine  &  Mercator.    8)  Original  documents  in  Augugt,  Opp.  Th,  X. 

Jli»«<Th.IV. 

IL  G.  J.  VonH  IS.  de  controversil^  qaas  Pel.  (^jasqae  reliquiae  movcrnnt  Lugd.  1613.  4.  auci  cd. 


■^JToMiTh.  III.  p.  979881 

^)  n«pl  lepwtf^f  L  VL  ed. ./:  il.  Bengel,  Stuttg.  1729.    Lw,  Leipa.  1884.  [transl.  into  Engl,  by 
*«Mt  Lood.  1739.  9.]    Uebers.  ▼.  Haaselbach,  Strals.  1820.  v.  Ritter.  BrL  1821. 
«)Jraiu<Th.IILi».1099«    d)  SoeralYll^U.    liiesph.  XIY,  4S, 


122  ANCIENT  CHURCH  HISTOBT.  PER  II.  IMPEBIAL  CHUBCH.  A.  D.  819-8(X)L 

Q,  VoM,  Amst  1655.  4  NoHtii  H.  PcUglana.  Pat  167&  C  (Opix  Yeron.  17S9L  Th.  L)  Oamerii  Dm, 
YII.  qaibus  Integra  continetnr  Polagianor.  Uldt  (lo  bis  edit  of  Morcator.  Par.  167&  Th.  I.)  O.  F, 
WlggetK,  pragui.  DantelL  des  Aogustinlnnaa  n.  Pelagiantam.  Bri.  1821.  vol  L  HamU  1888.  toL  IL 
[An  Hist  Presentation  of  Aufaftintsm  it  Pel.  from  tbe  Germ,  of  O.  F.  Wtg^en  by  O.  B,  EmsrtoiL 
Andover.  1S40.  &  Art  in  Cbrist  Spect  on  Early  H.  of  Thad.  vol  lY.  p.  S91ia  for  tba  year  188ft. 
PrinocUm  Tlieol.  Essays,  vol.  L  p.  SOss.  An  able  Hist  of  AugosUnism  baa  been  written  in  French 
in  Paris,  by  ^f.  Poi^aloL]  J.  G.  Voigt^  de  thooria  Angnstinlano,  SemipoL  et  Sjmerglat  Goett  1899. 
LenUen^  de  Pelagianor.  doctr.  prinoipiia.  Colon.  188&  J.  L,  Jaeobi,  d.  Lehr*  <L  Pielagla&  Lpc  184& 

§  109.    PelagianUm  and  Augttstinism. 

The  freedom  of  man  is  identical  with  his  dependence  upon  God,  bat  when 
we  reflect  upon  the  subject  both  these  relations  appear  Yery  different.  In 
their  controversies  with  the  Montanists  and  Manichaeans  the  Ghreek  fathers 
gave  special  prominence  to  the  doctrine  of  hnman  freedom.  The  Latin 
Church,  which  had  been  much  affected  by  TertuUian's  Montanistio  qurit| 
gave  greater  prominence  to  the  doctrine  of  man^s  dependence,  and  its  writersi 
without  denying  the  innocence  of  children  or  the  freedom  of  adults,  demon* 
strated  the  necessity  of  diviue  grace  in  opposition  to  human  freedom,  by 
proving  that  ever  since  Adam^s  fall  the  nature  of  man  has  been  oontmnally 
depraved.  PeUigiu*  and  Coelettixu,  pious  monks,  driven  by  the  incursions  of 
the  barbarians  from  Britain  (Bretogne  ?),  their  native  country,  first  to  Rome 
(409),  and  afterwards  to  Africa  (411),  that  they  might  promote  the  interests 
of  morality,  were  especially  zealous  for  the  freedom  of  the  will.  In  oppo- 
sition to  the  views  then  prevalent  in  Africa,  they  maintained  that  man's  na- 
ture was  not  corrupted  by  the  fall  of  Adam,  and  that  even  whore  Christian- 
ity was  not  known  men  might  render  themselves  by  the  power  of  their  own 
wills  proper  subjects  of  divine  grace.  They  acknowledged,  however,  that 
men  received  much  assistance  from  the  Church,  where  it  could  be  obtained, 
and  that  those  who  were  subjects  of  the  kingdom  of  Christ  participated  in 
more  exalted  blessings.  Augustine  perceived  that  if  this  doctrine  were  o(»i* 
sistently  carried  out,  men's  confidence  in  redemption  and  in  the  Church,  as 
indispensable  to  solvation,  would  be  seriously  endangered.  In  behalf  of 
these,  therefore,  he  maintained  his  theories  of  OrigincU  Sin  and  Pred^stina* 
tion^  alleging  that,  "  in  consequence  of  Adam's  fall  man's  nature  has  been 
burdened  with  an  infinite  guilt,  and  is  incapable  of  good  by  its  own  power. 
By  divine  grace,  therefore,  without  man's  co-operation,  and  through  the  in- 
strumentality of  the  Church,  a  new  life  is  imparted  to  some,  while  others  are 
abandoned  by  divine  justice  to  their  own  corruption,  and  from  all  eternity 
were  ordained  to  condemnation." 

§  110.    Augustinut, 

L  Opp.  odd.  Benedictini,  Par.  1679-1 70a  11  Tb.  t  (reca&  &  app.  CUricu^)  Anto.  1700k  li  Th.  £ 
(Yen.  1729sa.  12  Th.  f.  17568a.  18  Tb.  4)  Par.  188&-9. 11  Tb.  i,—Potidiua,  TiU  Aug.  &  Indieolw  Op*- 
rum  (about  432)  in  the  editt  of  bis  work&  Tbe  life  of  Aog.  by  an  anon,  writer  (ed.  Cramer^  KIL  ISH.) 
was  compiled  fh>m  tbe  Confessions  Jc  Poaaidlna.  (7ennaJ<iM,  de  viria  iUnstr.  o.  88. 

II.  C.  Bindemann^  d.  b.  Ang.  Brl  1S41.  vol.  I.  Bdhringer^  d.  K.  n.  Ihre  Zengen.  toL  I.  Abth.  t, 
K.  Branny,  Monnika  n.  Angustin.  Orcmma.  1846.  [Angnstlne'a  City  of  God,  tranal.  Lond.  1680.  t 
Meditations  by  SUinhope,  Lond.  1745.  dc  Confessions  by  WatU,  Lond.  1681. 12.  Ilia  Confteslona,  8  fld. 
revised  by  Puney  (Jc  republisbcd  In  Boston,  1S42.  12.\  in  vol.  L  Sermons  in  vola.  16  A  90,  &  Oom« 
nient  on  Ptialms  in  voli.  24  &  25,  and  on  John  in  vol  26  of  the  Lib.  o#  the  Fathers.  See  g  106^  note  A 
P.  Schaff,  Life  A  Labors  of  St  Aug.  from  tbe  Oenn.  by  T.  C.  Porter.  New  York.  18M.  12.] 

Aurdius  Augustinus  was  bom  at  Tagaste  in  Nnmidia,  Nor.  18,  8M.    Hifi 


chap.il  dogtbese.  s  107- auqustixe.  123 

mind  had  been  deeply  imbaed  daring  childhood  with  the  principles  of  Ghris- 
tianitj,  throngb  the  instructions  of  his  mother  Monica,    Bnt  when  only  a 
yonth  of  seventeen  years  he  studied  the  Roman  classics,  and  gave  himself  np 
to  worldly  pleasures.     Cioero^s  eloquent  pleadings  for  the  value  of  Phi- 
loaophy  re-awakened  his  desire  for  something  more  certain  and  eternal. 
The  Scriptnres  were  too  simple  for  his  glowing  fancy.    Seduced  by  the  prom- 
ise of  the  Manichaeans  that  complete  truth  would  be  revealed  to  all  whose 
ranon  independently  investigated  its  own  depth?,  he  continued  for  nine  years 
uider  their  instruction,  when  he  became  satisfied  that  he  had  been  deceived, 
tnd  doubted  whether  any  truth  could  be  known.    But  on  his  acquaintance 
with  New-Platonism  another  life  seemed  open  to  his  pursuit.    As  an  in- 
Mmctor  in  eloquence  he  visited  Rome  in  888  and  Milan  in  885,  still  devoting 
himself  to  the  enjoyment  of  sensual  pleasures.    Prompted  by  some  rccolleo- 
tioDs  of  early  childhood  he  was  induced  to  listen  to  Ambrose  simply  as  an 
ontcHT,  that  he  might  compare  the  Platonic  wisdom  with  the  gospeL    Then 
oommenoed  in  his  heart,  principally  through  the  influence  of  the  writings  of 
Plud,  a  severe  struggle  between  the  temporal  and  the  eternal,  the  progress  of 
wliieh  was  much  assisted  by  the  prayers  and  tears  of  his  mother.    In  a  sud- 
ioL  transport  of  his  feelings  he  became  satisfied  of  his  own  miraculous  con- 
fWilon,  and  on  Easter^night,  887,  he,  with  his  natural  son,  was  baptized  by 
Ambrose.    He  immediately  resigned  his  professorship  of  rhetoric  and  re- 
paired to  his  native  city,  where,  with  a  company  of  devout  associates,  he  lived 
in  retirement  from  the  world  until  he  was  ordained  in  Hippo  Regius  (Bona), 
ftfBt  a  presibyter  (891),  afterwards  an  assistant  bishop  (895).  Then  commenced 
Ui  ecclesiastical  life,  and  the  AiVican  churches  were  subsequently  governed 
bj  his  intellectnal  energies.     His  infiuence  became  predominant  in  every 
pirt  of  the  West,  and  his  fame  had  extended  through  the  whole  Church, 
when  he  was  for  three  months  besieged  in  his  own  city  by  the  Vandals,  and 
fied  Angnst  28,  480,  singing  the  Penitential  Psalms. — His  earlier  writings 
treat  of  Rhetoric  and  Philosophy,  and  are  for  the  most  part  lost.    His  theo- 
logical writings,  consisting  of  devotional,  doctrinal,  and  especially  controver- 
i^  treatises,  are  diffuse,  full  of  repetitions,  artificial,  and  often  insipid  by 
nere  plays  upon  words.   His  interpretations  of  Scripture  exhibit  no  extensive 
knowledge  of  languages,  or  historical  accuracy,  {a)    And  yet  all  his  works 
tre  characterized  by  an  exuberance  of  intellectual  life,  a  profound  knowledge 
of  the  human  heart,  and  an  all-controlling  love  to  God  breaking  forth  in  the 
most  impassioned  forms  of  speech.    He  never  shrunk  from  a  thought,  how- 
ever startling,  and  in  his  writings  he  has  freely  expressed  the  most  liberal,  as 
weQ  as  the  most  tremendous  conceptions  which  ever  rose  in  an  inquiring 
^lirit,  according  to  the  exigencies  of  his  train  of  reasoning.    In  his  Confes- 
Mii  (tbout  400),  with  the  proud  self-abasement  of  a  saint,  as  it  were  in  a 
amftifffi^ynal  before  God,  he  has  freely  described  himself  in  his  intellectual 
MksdaesB.  Qi)    His  Retractations  (about  429)  contain  indeed  a  severe  criti- 


«)  R  K.  Ganmm^  AngasUnQi  8.  Scr.  Interprea.    Hafti.  lS2a 

i)  CoBfeviooam  L  XIIL  praeC  Neandsr^  Bor.  1S28.  ed.  Bruder,  LpA.  1S37.    Trand.  as  an  excel- 
^  vmk.  of  dtTotion  Into  the  variooa  laDgnages  of  Europe.    [Revised  fh>m  a  fonner  Engl.  tranaL  \>j 


124  ANCIENT  CnUSCH  OISTOBT.  PER.  IL  IMPERIAL  CHURCO.  A.  D.  81»-60a 

r 

cism  on  his  writings  by  his  own  hand ;  bat  it  is  evident,  also,  that  they  were 
intended  to  recall  or  mitigate  whatever  in  his  earlier  works  was  favorable  to 
the  Pelagians.  In  his  writings  against  the  Manichaeans  he  had  given  promi- 
nence to  some  sentiments  favorable  to  the  freedom  and  goodness  of  the  hu- 
man wUl.  In  his  controversy  with  the  Donatists  the  idea  every  where  pre- 
vailing is,  that  of  a  Church  which  is  the  only  source  of  truth  and  certainty. 
In  his  own  life  there  had  been  the  most  direct  contrast  between  the  opera- 
tions of  sin  and  of  grace,  and  his  exalted  piety  took  pleasure  in  uncondition- 
ally rejecting  himself  that  he  might  live  wholly  upon  Grod's  grace  in  Christ 

§111.     Victory  of  Auguitinism, 

The  controversy  commenced  with  personal  reproaches  against  Coelestius, 
At  a  synod  held  at  Carthage  (412)  he  was  expelled  from  the  Church,  when 
he  betook  himself  to  Ephesus,  and  was  there  ordained  a  presbyter.  Pelagiu$ 
had  previously  gone  to  Palestine,  where  he  was  opposed  by  Eieronymtts  on 
the  ground  of  his  being  a  follower  of  Origen.  Augustine,  at  first,  in  a  veiy 
respectful  manner,  by  writing,  and  through  Orosim^  his  messenger,  opened  a 
controversy  with  him.  At  a  synod  convened  at  Dioapolis  in  Palestine  (415), 
he  was  accused  of  maintaining  that  men  could  live  without  sin,  but  his  con- 
demnation was  prevented  by  JohUy  Bishop  of  Jerusalem,  The  African 
Church,  however,  convinced  by  Augustine  of  the  danger  which  threatened 
the  cause  of  truth  through  him,  condemned  him  at  the  Synods  of  Milete  and 
Carthage  (416),  and  was  sustained  in  its  decision  by  the  concurrence  of  InfUh- 
cent  I,  Zonmue^  the  successor  of  Innocent,  entirely  mistaking  the  impor- 
tance of  this  controversy,  at  first  gave  protection  to  the  Pelagians  (417),  but 
afterwards,  when  the  African  Church  and  the  imperial  court  demanded  their 
condemnation,  with  a  similar  ignorance  he  denounced  them  in  his  Epistola 
tractatoria  (418).  Julianus  of  Eclanxtm  and  eighteen  other  bishops  were  de- 
posed and  driven  from  Italy  as  Pelagians.  These  generally  took  refuge  at 
Constantinople,  where  Nestorius,  in  accordance  with  the  general  spirit  of  the 
Oriental  Church,  received  them.  This  gave  occasion  for  a  connection  of  their 
cause  with  that  of  the  heresy  of  Nestorius,  in  consequence  of  which  the  Pe- 
lagians were  condenmed  with  the  Nestorians  at  the  general  Synod  of  Ephe- 
sus (481). 

§  112.    Semipelagianism, 

Jo.  Gefi'ten^  Hist  Semfpela^anlsmi  Antlqntoslma  (till  4M)  Ooett  1820.  4.  Wiggern^  AufOBdnli- 
mus  XX.  PelagUnismaa,  toI.  II.  (till  029.)  [Bee  bcC  g  109.  Also  an  Eauy  of  ProC  Wiffgert  In  Nled- 
ner'B  ZeltBchr.  for  Jan.  1854.] 

The  Greek  Church  had  never  taken  any  real  interest  in  this  controversy, 
and  even  at  a  later  period  it  simply  taught  that  human  nature  had  been  ren- 
dered infirm  in  consequence  of  Adam^s  iall.  But  even  in  the  Western 
churches  the  whole  system  of  Angustinism  had  never  been  sincerely  and 
openly  accepted  by  the  public  mind.  Augustine  himself  received  informa- 
tion that  an  intermediate  opinion  had  been  propagated  among  the  monks  of 


K  R  Pu»€y,  A  publ.  In  the  Lib.  of  the  Fathers  (sec  $  106,  note  e.)  vol  I.  Oxf.  1840.  A  repobL 
ton.  1842.] 


chap.il  DOGTBINE.  S  112.  bemipelaoianb.  cassian.  faubtus.     125 

XngHilift^  principally  throagh  the  iaflaence  of  John  Cassianus  {a\  a  disciple  of 
the  Desert  and  of  ChrysoBtom.    According  to  this  view  (afterwards  called 
SemipelagianUm)^  the  moral  power  of  man  has  indeed  been  enfeebled,  bat 
not  destroyed,  in  consequence  of  Adams^  fall,  and  hence  divine  grace  and  Im- 
man  freedom  conspired  together,  and  acted  in  concert  with  each  other  in  the 
work  of  man's  salvation.    This  doctrine,  which  conceded  as  much  to  the 
Church  as  to  the  free  moral  natnre  of  man,  and  without  which  there  seemed 
to  be  no  special  advantage  in  a  monastic  life,  obtained  great  favor.    The 
Church,  however,  had  too  decidedly  committed  itself  on  the  side  of  Angus- 
tine,  the  authority  of  this  father  was  then  too  great,  and  the  reasoning  by 
which  his  doctrines  were  sustained  was  too  irresistible,  to  permit  a  general 
and  open  departure  from  his  principles.    In  the  West,  therefore,  there  was 
always  an  obscurity  and  instability  of  sentiment  on  this  subject.    In  Gaul 
Semipelagianism  was  decidedly  in  the  ascendant.    Acting  under  the  direc- 
tion of  the  Synod  of  Arelate  (472),  Faustus^  Bishop  of  Khegium,  but  pre- 
Tiomsly  Abbot  of  Levins,  drew  up  a  Semipelagian  confession,  which  was  sub- 
Nribed  by  all  the  bishops  at  the  Synod  of  Lyons  (475).  {h)    From  policy  and 
a  pious  regard  for  Augustine,  the  sacred  name  of  that  father  was  not  men- 
tioned, but  this  was  only  to  assail  with  greater  recklessness  the  character  of 
btt  followers.    A  sect  of  Predestinarians,  distinctively  so  called,  never  ex- 
isted except  in  the  ima^nations  of  their  opponents,  and  an  extreme  defence 
of  predestination  professing  to  have  been  put  forth  at  that  time,  is,  if  not  a 
Jcsoitica],  at  least  a  Pelagian  work,  (e)    In  Africa  and  Home  a  tendency  to 
Angnstiniam  prevailed,  and  through  Komish  influence  at  the  Synods  of  Arau- 
m  (Orange)  and  Valentia  (529)  a  decision  was  obtained  in  favor  of  the  ex- 
dorive  operation  of  divine  grace,  {d)  although  predestination,  which  must 
Bceessarily  be  inferred  from  this,  was  evidently  evaded.    As  both  parties 
therefore  shnrnk  from  extreme  views  the  controversy  never  produced  an  ac- 
tual schism  in  the  Church,  although  sometimes  a  monk  or  a  presbyter  was  op- 
prciBed  by  his  bishop,  now  in  the  name  of  Augustine,  and  again  in  defence 
of  human  freedom.    But  just  as  Augustine  has  been  regarded  as  a  saint  by 
the  whole  Church,  Cassian  and  Faustus  have  always  been  honored  as  saints 
in  tbdr  own  country. 

•)  De  ixutltntis  coenobioram  L  XIL  Collationes  Patrum  XX IV.  De  tncarn.  ChrisU  adr.  Noator. 
I  VILOpik  ed.  Alardus  Gaaaeus,  DuacL  161 6w  8  Th.  auct  AtrebatL  162S.  f.—  Wiggera,  do  Jo.  Caas. 
HarfBcsM  cmm.  IIL  Sost  1S24&  4. 

I)  De  gratia  Dei  et  bamanao  mentia  liboro  arbitrlo.  (Bibl.  PP.  Lngd.  Th.  YIII.)  Itanai  Th.  TIL 
^UOT■. 

c)  b  tba  8d  toL  of  the  Predeatlnatiu.  Ed.  Sirmond,  Par.  164a  A  Gallandii  Tb.  X  p.  8578B.— 
^VOfn,  ToL  IL  pu  829aa.    [yearuUr^  Hist  vol  II.  p.  841ss.] 
i)  M<md  Tb.  TllL  p.  Tllfis.  [LaudotCa  Man.  of  Cotmcils.  p.  447.] 


126  ANCIENT  CHUBCH  IIISTOST.  PER.  IL  IMPERIAL  OHUBCH.  A.  D.  n9-80a 

IV.   GONTBOTBB8IE8  RESPBOTIKa  THE  TwO  NaTUBIS  OF  CHBIflT. 

I.  Liherati  (Arcbldiao.  Carth.  about  058)  Brevlarium  oaaM^  Nestorianoram  et  Entjohlan.  Ed. 
Oamerius.  Par.  1675.  and  in  Mantd  Th.  IX.  p.  eS9m.  {OOcuitu  I.  T)  BreTlcolaa  Hist  Entyehian* 
Istarum  a.  geata  do  nomine  AcacIL  (J/afi«(,  Th.  VIL  p.  106*^)  LeonUu*  BffanHnu9:  de  Metis 
actio  5-10.  Contra  Eutychianoa  et  Neatorian.  {GaUandii  Th.  XXL  p.  6218a.  658b8.)— IL  Walok^ 
Ketzerhiet  Th.  V.-VIIL  JSaur,  L.  t.  d.  Dreielnlgk.  toI.  I.  p.  eOSta.  toL  II.  Domer,  Entwiok- 
longs'reseh.  d.  L.  t.  d.  Person  Chr.  Stnttg.  1689.  p.  OOaa.  [JK.  J.  WUberforof^  On  the  Incamatkm  of 
J.  C.  2  ed.  Lond.  1849.  Philad.  1849.  p.  ISlsa.] 

§  113.     The  Kestorian  Controversy. 

L  Orig.  DocQinenta  in  ManH  Th.  lY.  p.  567v.  Th.  Y.  YIL  p.  S4lBa.  JToHim  Mereator^  d« 
haeresi  Nest  (0pp.  vol.  II.)    Socrat  YII,  2988.    Evagr.  I,  7ba. 

II.  Jahlovtkij  I>o  Nestorianismo.  Ber.  17M.  4.  Ofngl^^  ft.  d.  Yerdammnng  d.  Neat  (TftU 
Qnartalschr.  1S85.  P.  2.)— /Sa/I(7,  da  Eatychianiamo  ante  Eutyoben.  Wolfenk  t72&  4. 

The  doctrine  of  a  divine  nature  in  Christ  had  now  forced  its  waj  to  a 
general  acceptance,  and  that  of  his  human  nature  had  always  been  taken  for 
granted ;  but  when  men  reflected  upon  the  relation  which  these  sustained 
toward  each  other,  they  were  in  danger  of  either  asserting  their  unity  so 
strictly  that  the  human  nature  was  wholly  lost  in  the  Deity,  or,  to  secure  the 
existence  of  the  human  nature,  of  maintaining  its  separation  so  rigidly 
that  the  unity  of  Christ^s  person  would  be  destroyed.  The  natural  tendency 
of  each  school  induced  the  Alexandrian  to  adopt  the  former,  and  the  An- 
tiochian  the  latter  extreme.  Accordingly,  when  Nestorive^  originally  a  pres- 
byter at  Antioch,  but  after  428  the  Metropolitan  of  Ck>nstantinople,  full  of 
zeal  for  orthodoxy,  and  according  to  the  customary  language  of  his  school, 
carefully  distinguished  in  opposition  to  Apollinarb  between  the  two  natures 
of  Christ  (Mary  being  called  xp^^^^^i^^^t  i^^t  3(or($ieor,  and  the  relation  of  the 
natures,  awd^tia  and  iPoUrfait),  so  that  the  qualities  (Ibivfiara)  co-operated 
in  the  accomplishment  of  man's  redemption,  Cyril  of  Alexandria  (412-444), 
the  nephew,  and  in  every  respect  the  successor  of  Theophilus,  advocated  a 
union  of  natures  ((pvaiKrf  iviaan)  so  complete,  that  the  peculiarities  of  eadi 
were  predicable  of  the  other.  These  opposite  views,  sustained  respectively 
by  the  two  great  eastern  bishoprics,  and  by  the  schools  of  Alexandria  and 
Antioch,  from  their  peculiar  nature,  aflTorded  ample  occasion  for  misunder- 
standings and  unhappy  inferences.  Both  parties  were  charged  with  having 
destroyed  all  faith  in  man's  redemption ;  Nestorius  by  his  assertion  of  the 
doctrine  of  two  independent  natures,  and  Cyril  by  his  denial  of  the  human 
nature  of  Christ.  Cyril  succeeded  in  arraying  the  Roman  Church  against 
Nestorius,  by  connecting  the  controversy  with  the  Pelagian.  Nestorius  was 
condemned  at  the  Synods  of  Alexandria  and  Eome  (480),  and  Cyril  pub- 
lished his  jioctrines  in  twelve  Anathemas,  to  which  Nestorius  opposed  twdve 
others,  (a)  A  general  assembly  of  the  Church  was  convened  by  Theodoiius 
IL  at  Ephesus  (431),  in  which  Cyril  and  his  bishops  pronounced  condemna- 
tion upon  Nestorius  before  the  Syrian  and  Greek  bishops  had  arrived.  On 
the  arrival  of  these  bishops  they  chose  John  of  Antioch  for  their  president, 
and  deposed  Cyril.     The  latter,  however,  well  knew  how  to  gain  the  fiivor 

a)  JTofMi,  Tb.  lY.  p.  1067bb.  pc  109988.    Mumieh^r,  CdUn^  DGewb.  toL  L  pi 


OHAP.il    DOCTRINS.    S  118^  3!^^T0BIAN181L    fll^  BUTYCHIANI81L       127 

of  the  emperor,  and  to  produce  dissension  among  the  bishops  of  the  opposite 
psrtj.  He  even  became  reconciled  to  John  of  Antioch,  having  finally  con- 
tented to  snbBcribe  (488)  the  articles  of  faith  which  that  prelate  had  induced 
his  party  to  adopt  at  Ephesos,  (h)  in  which  the  two  natures  of  Christ  were 
especially  distinguished.  In  such  a  strife  of  mere  intrigues,  Kestorius,  with 
his  monastic  learning  and  want  of  practical  tact,  was  no  match  for  his  op- 
poDoitB.  He  was  soon  deserted  by  all  parties,  and  died  in  wretchedness 
(aboot  440),  with  his  character  misunderstood  and  his  doctrine  misrepresent- 
ed. The  only  advocate  of  his  opinions  by  which  the  conflict  was  continued, 
was  the  theological  school  of  Edetaa^  a  branch  of  the  Antiochian,  and  this 
gradually  withdrew  to  Persia.  Under  its  influence,  the  Persian  churches 
penerered  in  their  opposition  to  the  Synod  of  Ephesus,  and  undef  the  name 
of  Chaldean  Christiana,  or  Christiana  of  St,  Thomas,  as  they  were  called  in 
India,  or  Neatoriana,  as  they  were  called  by  their  opponents,  they  became 
aumeroiiB,  and  carried  far  into  Asia  the  principles  of  Christian  beneficence 
md  Grecian  refinement.  But  even  in  the  imperial  Church,  a  disposition 
friendly  to  Neatorianism  was  continued,  especially  under  the  influence  of 
Ihaa^  Bi8hq>  of  Edeesa  (486-457),  and  the  learned  Theodoret.  (e) 

§  114.     The  Eutychian  Controteray, 
Aeto  In  ManH  Tb.  YL  TIL    Evagr,  I,  9«i  II,  9. 

The  controversy  which  had  been  thus  violently  and  deceptively  settled 
temed  faintly  still,  with  Alexandria  and  Palestine  on  the  one  side,  and  Con- 
tUnUinople  and  Asia  on  the  other.     When,  therefore,  Eutyehes,  an  archiman- 
drite of  Constantinople,  obstinate  in  his  disposition,  but  well  versed  in  the 
Beriptures,  taught,  in  direct  opposition  to  Nestorianism,  that  every  thing  hu- 
BtD  in  the  nature  of  Christ  was  absorbed  by  his  divinity,  and  became  one 
Btture  with  it,  Flatianus,  Bishop  of  Constantinople,  had  him  condemned  at 
Aiynod  of  hia  diocese  (448).  (a)    Leo  the  Great  approved  of  this  decision  in 
n  epistle  in  which,  though  ho  maintained  that  the  two  natures  of  Christ  acted 
ii  perfect  harmony,  he  clearly  distinguished  between  what  was  divine  and 
ivliat  was  human  in  the  life  of  Jesus,  (h)    Dioscurus  of  Alexandria  (111  51), 
liio,  in  defending  Eatyches,  felt  that  he  was  equally  defending  his  predecessor 
Gjril,  succeeded  at  the  general  synod  of  EpJiesm  (449),  through  the  influ- 
nee  of  an  excited  populace,  in  justifying  Eutyches  and  deposing  Flavian. 
We  are  assured  by  the  emperor  Theodosius  II.,  that  the  decision  was  obtained 
ia  a  perfectly  legal  manner,  on  tlie  basis  of  the  prior  decrees  of  Ephesus  and 
KietM.    But  on  the  sudden  death  of  the  emperor  (450),  the  general  feeling 
<f  diipleasore  at  the  violent  proceedings  of  Dioscurus  found  a  public  ex- 
pMnoD.     The  empress  Pulcheria  and  her  husband  Mareianvs  convoked  a 
Gciwral  Council  at  Chalcedon  (451),  whose  decision  was  secured  by  the  mi'>de 

i)  JbM<  Th.  IV.  p.  878.  oomp.  781&  SOSsi. 

t)A9ttmaml  De  Byrto  Nettorianii.  (BlbL  Orient  Som.  172a  £  Th.  III.  P.  II.)  Ehedjem  L. 
*iqirilie<l«T«rit  lldeL  {A,  Maji  N.  CoIL  Th.  2L  P.  IL)  [if.  Grant,  Hist,  of  the  Nestori«xiii 
■*!«*.  Itoa] 

^Tbe  Aeto  in  tlM  Aetto  L  id  Oudoedon.    ManH  Th.  YL  p.  M9a&    [Land<m,  p.  16788.] 

^)EMdFliTfmiiii.    X«(m.  Oppc  edd.  JSSdUdrtoi.  Ep.  S& 


128  ANCIENT  CUUBCH  HISTOBY.  FEB.  IL  IMPEBIAL  CHUBCIL  A.  D.  81S-80a 

in  which  it  was  constituted.  Dioscuras  was  deposed,  Eatjches  was  con* 
demned,  not  only  Ibos  and  Theodoret,  but  even  Cyril  were  declared  or- 
thodox, and  the  doctrine  of  the  Church  was  established  on  the  basis  of  the 
Boman  epistle :  Two  natures  are  without  confusion  but  inseparably  united  in 
the  one  person  of  Christ  The  Synod  of  Ephesus  has  ever  since  been  regard- 
ed as  the  Robber-Synod  (avuodos  Xi/orpix^).  (c) 

§  115.     The  Monaphy$ite8,     The  Content  respecting  Chalcedon. 

Acts  in  ManH  Th.  YII.  p.  4S1-IX.  p.  70a  LeonUut  Byu,  de  scctto  liber,  actio  6-10.  and  Contm 
Eutychianoe  et  Ne«tnrian.  1.  IIL  (Gallandiiy  BibL  Th.  XII.)  Writings  and  Fragments  of  the 
Party  Leaders  in  A.  Maji  N.  ColL  ISSa  Th.  VIL  P.  L  and  SpiciL  Bom.  Th.  III.  X,  Etagr.  II,  bm. 

The  Alexandrians,  who  gave  special  prominence  to  the  divine  nature  in 
Christ,  and  yet  were  unwilling  to  connect  themselves  with  the  Eutychian 
party,  felt  much  aggrieved  by  the  action  of  the  Council  of  Chalcedon.  They 
were  called  by  their  opponents  JJonophysites,  and  these  opponents  were 
called  by  them  Nestorians  and  Dyophysites.  The  controversy  was  at  first 
conducted  by  insurrections  of  monks  and  of  people,  and  in  Palestine  was 
attended  with  bloodshed,  but  in  Alexandria  and  Antioch  each  party  set  up 
its  rival  bishops.  The  emperor  Leo  I.  (457-474)  sustained  the  decisions  of 
Chalcedon,  though  with  a  judicious  moderation.  Peter  Fullo  (yva<f)fvs)  hav- 
ing assumed  the  office  of  Bishop  of  Antioch,  and  introduced  into  the  liturgy 
a  Monophysite  formula,  which  asserted  that  God  had  been  crucified  (thence 
called  Theopaschites),  was  expelled  by  the  emperor.  In  the  revolutions 
which  then  took  place  so  frequently  in  the  imperial  palace,  ecclesiastical  con- 
troversies were  made  subservient  to  political  intrigues.  When  the  emperor 
Zeno  Isauricus  was  overthrown  by  Baniluem  (476),  the  latter  strengthened 
his  party  by  gaining  over  the  Monophysites,  and  published  a  circular  in 
which  he  condemned  the  Synod  of  Chalcedon.  (a)  The  insurrection  in  Con- 
stantinople by  which  Zeno  was  restored  to  his  throne  (477),  was  under  the 
direction  of  the  Catholic  patriarch  Aeaeius.  The  Monophysites,  however, 
had  exhibited  so  much  power  under  the  usurper,  that  the  emperor,  by  the 
advice  of  the  patriarch,  endeavored  to  reconcile  them  by  publisliing  a  creed 
called  the  Uenoticon  (h)  (482),  in  which  the  disputed  articles  were  entirely 
avoided.  Felix  11.^  the  Roman  bishop,  placed  himself  at  the  head  of  those 
zealots  who  were  opposed  to  this  fellowship  with  the  Monophysites,  and 
excommunicated  Acacius  (484).  But  even  the  more  rigid  portion  of  the 
Monophysites  in  Egypt  withdrew  from  their  own  patriarch,  who  had  been 
so  easily  pacified  (thence  called  'Akc<^oi).  Though  both  parties  equally 
reviled  the  Uenoticon,  it  was  the  means  of  external  peace  in  the  Oriental 
Church,  and  Anastasitis  (401-^18),  who  attempted  to  free  the  state  from 
both  parties,  was  equally  hated,  threatened  and  calumniated  by  both.  Jmtm 
L  (518-527)  decided  against  the  Monophysites  and  expelled  their  bishops, 
but  in  Egypt,  where  their  cause  was  popular,  he  was  politic  enough  not  to 
assail  them.    In  Alexandria,  however,  they  fell  out  among  themselves,  for 

c)  Leicaldy  die  sogen.  Biubersynode.  (Illgen's  Zeitachr.  toI  YIII.  P.  1.)    [London,  p.  8t&  11&] 
o)  JSvoffr.  Ill,  4.     b)  Ibid.  Ill,  14    Btrger,  Hanotica  Orient  Tit  1T98. 4. 


GHAP.il    DOCTBINE.    1 116.  8EVEKIAN3.    J  11«l  JUSTINIAN  L  129 

the  Seteriatu^  so  called  from  Severos  their  leader,  the  expelled  Patriarch  of 
Antioch,  who  was  rather  iDclined  to  confound  the  divine  with  the  hnman 
nature,  and  acknowledged  that  the  principal  attribute  of  the  latter  was  the 
eorrnptibility  of  the  body  of  Christ  (therefore  reproached  as  *3apToXaTpat), 
were  opposed  to  the  Julianists  (A(l)^apTodoKrJTai\  the  followers  of  Julian  of 
Ealieamasgus^  who  taught  that  there  was  such  an  absorption  of  the  human 
nature  into  the  divinitj  that  nothing  mortal  remained,  (c) 

§  116.    Justinian, 

Procopiua  (d.  about  552X  espedallj  bis  military  history,  and  bis  bfst  of  the  court :  'AvckSoto, 
mat  areana,  cd.  OreOL  Lpe.  1827.  Contin.  of  the  Imi).  Illst  552-^9.  by  Affalhias^  cd.  Kiebvhr. 
Ban.  19S8L  (Corpoa  Serr.  Byzant  P.  IIL  1829-44. 

Justinian  /.,  in  the  course  of  his  long  and  frequently  brilliant  reign 
(527-565),  by  the  successful  weapons  of  his  generals  restored  the  Roman 
dominion  in  Africa  and  Italy  to  its  former  splendor.    Dutiful  toward  the 
Church,  temperate  even  to  monastic  strictness,  covetous  and  yet  prodigal, 
active  in  many  departments  of  business,  and  untiring  in  his  diligence,  though 
moderate  in  natural  talents,  he  was  eager  to  acquire  the  reputation  of  a  mas- 
ter in  every  kind  of  human  knowledge.     Even  while  burdened  with  the 
cares  of  bis  despotic  reign,  he  digested  from  the  treasures  of  Roman  juris- 
prudence a  code  of  civil  law  which  has  been  ever  since  the  source  of  legal 
inence  for  all  civilized  nations.    lie  then  attempted  in  like  manner,  as  a 
theologian,  to  annihilate  all  heresies,  reconcile  all  parties,  and  establish  a 
trae  system  of  orthodoxy  for  all  future  time.    But  while  he  loaded  the 
Church  with  gifts,  he  increased  the  distractions  of  both  Church  and  State  by 
bia  creeds,  and  efforts  to  establish  uniformity.    In  all  these  he  doubtless  be- 
fieved  that  he  was  guided  by  his  own  sagacity,  while  he  was  really  the  mere 
tool  of  court  divines  and  eunuchs.    He  was  disposed  to  favor  the  Council 
o(  Chalcedon,  but  Theodora  well  knew  how  to  direct  his  edicts  so  that  they 
generally  were  favorable  to  the  Monophysites.    This  woman,  having  sharae- 
My  spent  her  youthful  beauty  amid  all  the  dissipations  of  Constantinople, 
▼•8  exalted,  by  the  favor  of  the  emperor,  to  be  the  sharer  of  his  power  over 
^  empire,  and  the  sole  mistress  of  himself.    On  the  tlirone  she  was  tyran- 
idcal,  but  her  disposition  was  lofty  and  her  morals  were  irreproachable. 
1.  On  finding  that  the  diECUssions  w^hich  he  had  ordered  between  the  Catho- 
Btt  And  the  Monophysites  were  of  no  avail,  (a)  the  emperor  hoped  to  win 
the  Utter  by  allowing  them  to  use  their  formula  asserting  simply  that  one  of 
the  stcred  Trinity  was  crucified  (588).    But  while  this  only  embittered  the 
Mings  of  the  Catholics,  it  was  not  enough  for  the  Monophysites.    Anfhi- 
ftw  (585),  the  Monophysitic  patriarch,  who  had  been  appointed  through 
^^wdora's  influence,  was  removed  the  next  year  by  the  Catholic  party,  and 
n^tTftff,  who  had  been  assisted  in  his  attainment  of  the  Roman  see  (588) 
^  the  secret  understanding  that  he  would  favor  the  Monophysites,  found 


0  GUteler^  Monopbysitamm  vett  variac  de  Chr.  persona  opiniones  inpr.  ex  Ipeomm  effaUa  reeend 
*^10Mtr.  Oott  188Su  8a  2  P. 
•)CQQalio  CathoUoor.  c  SeveriaDis  a.  581.    {Manti  Tb.  YIIL  p^  817v.) 

9 


130  ANCIENT  CnUKCU  HISTORT.  PER.  II.  IMPEKIAL  CHURCH.  A.  D.  819-80a 

no  difficulty  in  absolving  himself  fW>m  his  oath,  (b)  2.  The  name  of  Origin 
was  dear  to  a  monastic  party  in  the  East,  not  so  mnch  for  his  scientific  char- 
acter as  for  the  relation  of  his  system  to  the  Monophysites.  This  party 
gained  great  influence  at  conrt  by  means  of  Theodorits  Ascida^,  Metropolitan 
of  Cacsarea  in  Cappadooia.  The  Catholic  party,  however,  found  means 
through  MennaSy  the  Patriarch  of  Constantinople,  to  procure  from  the  empe- 
ror a  condemnation  of  Origon.  8.  Thcodorus  soon  revenged  himself  by  con- 
vincing the  emperor  that  the  Monophysites  would  be  reconciled  to  the 
Church  by  a  sentence  of  condemnation  upon  Theodore  of  Mopsuestia^  the 
instructor  of  Nestorius,  Theodoret  of  Cyrus  and  Ihas  of  Edessa^  tlie  princi- 
pals of  the  Antiochian  school.  The  errors  of  these  teachers  having  been 
collected  (about  644)  into  three  chapters  (tria  capitula),  were  accordingly 
condemned  by  Justinian,  {c)  Though  the  Monophysites  were  much  delighted 
with  this  act,  they  were  on  that  ac<iount  no  more  partial  to  the  Council  of 
Chalcedon.  The  Catholics,  on  the  other  hand,  looked  upon  it  as  a  direct 
assault  upon  that  council.  To  quell  these  discussions,  Justinian  convoked 
the  fifth  (Ecumenical  Council  at  Constantinople  (558),  which,  in  compliance 
with  the  imperial  theology,  condemned  the  three  Antiochian  teachers,  (d) 
Vigilius^  who  at  first  led  the  West  in  its  opposition  to  this  proceeding,  lost 
the  glory  of  his  martyrdom  by  frequent  vacillations  and  concessions.  Pda- 
gius  became  his  successor  in  consequence  of  his  acknowledgment  of  the 
imperial  synod  (555).  A  large  portion  of  the  Western  bishops  now  broke 
off  connection  -with  Rome  as  well  as  Constantinople,  and  the  liberty  of  the 
Church  found  some  bold  champions  not  only  against  the  despotism  of  the 
emperor,  but  the  pliant  disposition  of  the  Roman  bishop,  (e)  4.  The  last 
attempt  of  Justinian  to  draw  over  the  Monophysites,  was  made  when  he  had 
(564)  the  doctrine  of  the  IncorrvptihiUty  of  Christ's  body  adopted  as  an 
article  of  the  authorized  creed.  He  had  just  commenced  the  work  of  ex- 
pelling those  Catholic  bishops  who  resisted  him,  when  the  Church  was  deliv- 
ered from  the  confusion  produced  by  his  zeal  for  the  faith  by  his  death.  (/) 

§  117.     The  Edict  of  Peace  and  the  Monophysite  Church, 

Xo  sooner  had  Justin  II.  reach  the  throne,  than  he  issued  an  edict 
(565),  (n)  in  which  he  admonished  all  Christians  to  unite  with  him  to  pro- 
mote the  glory  of  the  Redeemer,  and  to  contend  no  more  about  words  and 
persons.  Tlie  apostolic  Catholic  Church,  however,  was  at  the  same  time 
assured  that  its  present  position  would  be  maintained.  Tlie  arbitrary  man- 
ner in  which  the  imperial  laws  for  the  regulation  of  faith  had  for  some  time 
been  enforced,  rendered  such  a  request  from  an  emperor  peculiarly  grateftil 
to  the  public  mind.    The  successors  of  Yigilius  were  now  more  zealous  in 


h)  Llberati  Breviar.  c  S2.     rigilii  Epc  ad  Jiutin.   {JfanH  Th.  IX  p.  85.)  ad  MeBnam. 
{Ibid.  p.  as.) 

c)  JtmUn,  ad  Mennam  adr.  Impiam  Orig.  {ManH  Th.  IX.  p.  487v.  eompc  895fl&) 

d)  Acta  in  Manai  Th.  IX.  p.  15788. 

e)  Eap.  Faeundu*  Bfrmiatuntis  (aboat  548)  pro  defensione  trinm  oapltt  L  XIL  (Oppu  ad.  J[ 
aimwnd.V9i.\m9.    OcUandiiTYi.  yiL) 

f)  Euigr,  IV,  89-40.     WaUX,  Ketxergeach.  toL  X.  p.  578a& 
a)X9agr,Y^i.    A'ieepk.  XYll,9S» 


CSAP.il    DOCTHimS.    {117.  MONOPHY8ITE8.    { 118- MONOTHBLITES.      131 

enfordng  the  ftothority  of  the  fifth  oecnmenioal  council  in  the  West,  than 
he  had  formerly  heen  in  opposing  it  It  was  not^  however,  generally 
acknowledged  until  enhflequent  centuries,  when  it  was  not  opposed,  hecause 
tiie  auhjects  in  dispute  were  nearly  forgotten.  In  the  East,  each  party 
retained  possession  of  all  that  it  had  obtained.  In  opposition  to  the  Catholic 
patriareb  of  Alexandria,  who  was  sustained  entirely  by  the  emperor's  power, 
the  Mbnophysites  possessed  a  patriarch  of  their  own  (after  586),  and  consti- 
tated  the  Egyptian  national  Ohurch  of  the  CopU^  with  which  was  connected 
the  Etbiopic  Church,  (h)  The  Armenians  avaOed  themselves  of  the  occa- 
■on  when  the  Henoticon  was  enacted,  to  renounce  the  authority  of  the  S}niod 
of  Chalcedon,  and  thus  in  the  sixth  century,  when  they  were  subject  to  the 
Fenian  yoke,  they  entirely  renounced  all  connection  with  the  Church  of  the 
empire,  (e)  The  apostolic  zeal  of  Jacob  Baradai  (641-678)  gave  the  Mono- 
phyatee  of  Syria  and  ^Mesopotamia  a  permanent  ecclesiastical  constitution, 
ind  the  name  of  Jacobites,  (d)  These  disruptions  from  the  imperial  Catholic 
Church  were  gradually  confirmed  by  the  peculiar  customs  of  the  provinces 
where  they  took  place,  until  by  the  conquests  of  Islam,  to  which  they  con- 
tributed, they- became  irreparable.  In  the  conquered  provinces,  the  Catho- 
Kea,  <m  account  of  their  connection  with  the  empire  (hence  called  Mekhit^ 
from  T\^Xi\  were  even  more  oppressed  than  the  Monophysites,  and  their 
patriarch  generally  resided  at  Constantinople. 

§  118.     The  Monothelite  Controversy. 

L  Orlf.  1>ocaroeiit«In  JfrifMi  Tb.  X.  pw  869-1  ISA.  Th.  XL  p.  190-1023.  Anastasll  Bibliotheearfi  (about 
fliV  CoIIeetaBM  d«  U^  quae  specUot  ad  Htst  MonotheL  ed.  Strvmrndy  Par.  1620.  and  GaUandii  Th. 
XUL  JTUMpkori  (Patriarch  of  Constant  d.  888),  Breviarium  Hist  (602-769.)  ed.  Petavlus,  Par.  1616. 

IL  /*.  OorUnyitiiy  Hist  baer.  Monothelitarum.    In  hU  Anctoar.  PP.  Par.  164&  U,  8. 

While  the  emperor  fferaelivs  (after  622)  was  re-establishing  the  power 
of  the  empire  in  Syria  and  Armenia,  he  endeavored  to  reconcile  the  Mono- 
physites with  the  imperial  Church,  by  conceding  that  although  there  were 
two  natures  in  Christ,  there  was  but  one  manifestation  of  will  (cWpycca  dcar- 
Vk^)-     CyruAf  who  had  been  appointed  by  the  emperor  patriarch  of  Alex- 
tadria,  succeeded  by  this  expedient  in  gaining  over  the  Severians  of  his 
fiooese  (688).   But  when  Sophronius^  a  monk  of  Palestine,  and  after  684  Patri- 
u^  (rf  Jerusalem,  who  happened  then  to  be  in  Alexandria,  excited  a  violent 
on^ositionto  it,  the  emperor  published  a  creed  ("E/cSfo-cr,  688)  (a)  composed  by 
S^ius^  Patriarch  of  Constantinople,  and  approved  by  Honorivs^  the  Roman 
Uop,(()  whioh  aseumed  that  there  was  but  one  Christ  and  onevnW  (tu 
^fu).    In  this  he  had  more  regard  to  the  final  adjustment  of  tlie  contro- 
^wsT,  than  to  the  victory  of  the  imperial  party.    But  in  such  an  age,  a  dis- 
pBto  thus  awakened  was  not  easily  set  to  rest.    The  Roman  bishops  after 

0  TaH-tddini  Makrimii  (d.  1441X  Hist  Coptorom  obrUt  arab.  et  Ut  ed.  WeUer.  Solisb.  182& 
Jfiei  I«7itira,  Oriens  In  IT  Patriarabatns  digestn^  (Par.  1740.  8  Th.  t)  Th.  II.  p.  SSTsk. 

^Sainl-MarUn^  JAkm.  rar  PArman.  Th.  I.  pu  829flB.  £ooL  Anneniacae  canones  selectl.  (ii. 
*(K5.CoILTh.XP.  II.) 

')  iMmani,  BibL  orient  Th.  IL    LequUn  L  c  Th.  IL 

<)il:lnl•<Th.X.^99Sa. 

^BamorWEi^  ad  Serginm.  {Mcnui  Th.  XL  pc  687.  oomp.  079.) 


132    ANCIENT  CHUECn  HISTORY.  PER.  U.  IMPERIAL  CHURCH.  A.  D.  81S-8(M. 

John  IV,  (689),  with  a  stricter  reference  to  the  troe  faith  or  the  injury  of 
their  rivals  than  to  the  orthodoxy  of  their  predecessors,  placed  tjieraselves  at 
the  head  of  the  opposition  to  the  Monothelites,  and  excluded  the  patriarch 
of  Constantinople  from  the  communion  of  the  Church.  A  law  {rvnot)  (e) 
enacted  by  Constans  II,  (648)  was  intended  to  enforce  peace  by  an  arbitrary 
prohibition  of  the  controversy.  But  Martin  I,  of  Rome,  at  the  first  Synod 
of  Lateran  (649),  condemned  the  Monothelites  and  both  the  imperial  laws. 
He  was  consequently  first  imprisoned,  then  condemned  at  Constantinople  for 
treason,  and  finally  ho  died  in  great  distress,  (d)  To  allay  the  strife  which 
now  threatened  the  precarious  power  of  the  empire  in  Italy,  the  emperor 
Constantine  Pogonatus  convoliod  the  sixth  OQcnmenical  synod  at  Constanti- 
nople (680).  This  assembly,  under  the  influence  of  Agatho,  the  Roman 
bishop,  besides  condemning  Honorius,  (e)  recognized  in  Christ  consistently 
with  the  doctrine  of  two  nature.**,  and  certain  "passages  of  Scripture  inter- 
preted so  as  to  conform  to  it,  two  wills  made  one  by  the  moral  subordination 
of  the  human.  The  Monothelites,  however,  obtained  one  more  transient 
victory  in  the  Greek  Church  under  Philip  Bardanes  (711-713).  But  after 
the  elevation  of  Anastasius  II,  to  the  throne,  they  were  generally  rejected, 
and  only  a  small  remnant  sustained  themselves  in  the  convent  of  St.  Maro  on 
Mount  Lebanon,  under  a  patriarch  of  their  own.  (/) 

§  119.     Ecclesiastical  Literature. 

Chrysostom  and  Augustine  were  still  peerless  models  for  the  churches  in 
which  their  languages  were  respectively  spoken.  The  energies  of  the  Alex- 
andrian and  Antiochian  schools  were  exhausted  in  party  strifes.  Cyril  (d. 
444),  whose  natural  acuteness  was  under  the  guidance  of  his  passions,  ex- 
ceeded the  characteristic  limits  of  the  Alexandrian  spirit,  {a)  and  Theodoret^ 
Bishop  of  Cyrvs  (d.  457),  the  last  of  the  Antiochian  school,  though  a  judi- 
cious expounder  and  a  devout  historian,  could  not  escape  the  malediction  of 
the  Church.  (&)  The  qualities  of  both  schools  appear  to  have  been  onoe 
more  combined  in  the  collection  of  the  Epistles  of  Ind<yre  of  Pelusium  (d. 
about  440),  who,  though  a  resident  in  Alexandria,  was  the  friend  of  Chrysos- 
tom, and  found  among  the  monastic  virtues  liberty  to  be  mild  in  science  and 
fearless  in  his  opposition  to  the  powerful  both  in  the  world  and  in  the 
Church,  {c)  The  writings  which  assumed  the  name  of  Dionysius  Areopagita^ 
indicate  that  the  Athenian  New-Platonism  had  become  Christianized  near 
the  commencement  of  the  sixth  century,  and  they  have  ever  since  been  the 
model  of  those  dispositions  which  strive  to  die  to  themselves,  and  are  wait- 

c)  AfanH  Th.  X.  p.  102»8.     d)  Manti  Th.  3L  p.  851& 

6)  ManH  Th.  XI.  p.  656.  622.  781. 

f)  Lequien^  Orlens  Chr.  Th.  IIL  p.  Isa.     Walch,  vol.  IX.  p.  474m. 

a)  CommoDtaries,  Polem.  Treatises,  Uomllios,  and  Letters.  0pp.  ed.  J.  Av^erit  Par.  168S.  7  Th.  £ 
On  Mattb.,  Hebrews,  and  7  dogm.  Essays  io  A.  Maji  Col.  Th.  YIIL 

&)  Commentariea,  History  of  the  Church,  Hist,  of  IIcreeieA,  Lives  of  Saints,  and  Polem.  Treat- 
iacs.  0pp.  edd.  Sirmond  ct  GamUr,  Par.  1742-84.  0  Th.  £  SchuUe  et  NoeswU,  HaL  1769-74.  0  Th.— 
Richter,  de  Theor.  £pp.  Panllnar.  interprete.  Lps.  1822. 

c)  Epp.  1.  IV.  cd.  RiUerhwt,  ITdlb.  1605.  £  Epp.  ineditae,  ed.  SchotL  Anto.  1623.  £  All  together: 
Par.  1638.  Yen.  1745.  t—IT.  A.  Niemeyer^  de  Isid.  Pelosiotae  vita,  scriptia  et  doctr.  HaL  182S.  eompk 
Arch.  £  KQesch.  1826.  P.  8.  pc  197bb. 


CHAP.il    DOCTBINR    S  119.  PHILOPONITS.    BOETHIUS.    CASSIODOBUd.    133 

ing  patiently  for  a  complete  nnion  with  the  Deity,  (d)    The  Aristotelian  sys- 
tem of  logio  waa  used  in  all  theological  controversies.     JoJin  Philoponvs 
(middle  of  the  6th  century),  the  acnte  expounder  of  Aristotle,  and  the  inde- 
pendent Christian  philosopher,  hat  an  adherent  of  the  Monophysites,  declared 
Iiimself  in  the  Greek  Chnrch  decidedly  partial  to  this  tendency,  thongh  not 
imfriendly  to  many  doctrines  of  Platonism.    He  was  accused  of  Tritheism, 
because  the  ideas  entertained  hy  the  Church  on  the  suhject  of  the  divine 
nature  and  personality  were  not  satisfactory  to  him,  and  he  took  offence  at 
the  doctrine  of  the  resurrection,  which  he  descrihed  as  a  new  creation,  since 
with  the  form  he  maintained  that  the  matter  of  the  hody  was  gone,  (c)    The 
Roman  Church  hecame  acquainted  with  Aristotle  through  the  labors  of 
A»  M.  T.  S^  Boetliiu9,    In  the  writings  which  hear  his  name,  Aristotelian 
formulae  are  used  to  defend  the  doctrines  of  the  Incarnation  and  the  Trinity. 
But  in  prison  his  mind  had  been  raised  above  the  fear  of  death  by  the  conso- 
lations of  a  pious  heathen  philosophy.     He  died  (524)  in  defence  of  the 
interests  of  his  native  land,  and  the  Church  has  invested  him  with  the  glory 
of  martyrdom.     By  birth,  merit,  and  success  he  resembled  the  nobler  Ro- 
mans of  the  Augustan  age,  and  indeed  he  may  be  regarded  as  the  last  speci- 
men of  the  race.  (/)    The  sciences  which  had  been  created  by  the  peculiar 
character  of  the  Greeks  and  the  Romans,  necessarily  shared  in  the  declining 
fortunes  of  those  nations.    The  last  signs  of  Uellenic  refinement  disappeared 
io  the  sixth  century  from  every  portion  of  the  empire  except  Rome  and  Con- 
stantinople with  the  ravages  of  the  Barbarians,  of  the  Pestilence,  and  of  the 
Cfhurch  itself.    A  meagre  collection  of  traditions  was  all  that  now  remained, 
because  it  had  been  appropriated  to  her  own  use  by  the  Church.    Even 
Ounodorus  (a  consul  and  a  monk,  d.  about  562)  attempted  to  preserve  only 
those  fragments  of  science  which  he  thought  might  be  serviceable  to  the 
Charch.  (^)    Scriptural  exegesis  consisted  entirely  of  such  compilations  from 
the  treasures  of  former  times  as  had  been  commenced  in  the  East  by  Froco- 
piut  Gazaeus  (about  520),  and  in  the  West  by  Frimasius  of  Adrymetvm 
(about  550).  (h)    A  system  of  doctrines  had  likewise  been  formed  for  the 


tf)nc/»2  T^t  Upapx^f*-^-  n€p2  T^s  iKKKtciaarriKTii  itpapx^cis-  Tltpl  dtlvy  ovoixdrwy.  Utpl 
MWTiK^f  btoXoylaf.  Epp.  XII.— 0pp.  ed.  Corderius,  (Antu.  16a4.)  Par.  1644.  2  Tti.  I  Constantini, 
V«B.17S60w  i  Th.  t  Uebere.  m.  Abhh.  v.  Engelhardt^  Sulzb.  1S28.— J!  Dalleua^  de  scrlptis,  quae  sub 
If*,  flt  Dion.  A.  Domm.  circamfer.  Qen.  1660.  4.  Engeihardt :  De  Dion.  PIotinlzAnte.  £rl.  1S20.  De 
«%.  icripUir.  Araop.  ErL  1822.  A.  Ilelffhrich^  d.  chr.  Mystik  in  ihrer  EntwickL  n.  ihrcn  Denkinalen. 
^ISH  2  ro\&.^BaumgarUn-CrvHu9^  do  Dion.  A.  Jon.  1823.  Bevised  in  0pp.  tbeul.  Jen.  1836. 
P^ttSm.    On  the  otber  side:  liittery  Ocsch.  d.  chr.  Pliil.  vol.  II.  p.  M9. 

•)  Scipeetlcg  bim :  Jo.  Damatc.  de  hai>re<>.  c  88.  Pbot.  c.  21-23.  K.  7S.  Niceph,  XVIII,  45-49. 
^^»^'By.  de  sectis,  act  b.~-Schar/enburg^  do  Jo.  Phil.  Trithclsmi  defensore.  Lps.  176S.  (Conini. 
ttfoled.  VtUktt9en^  etc  Th.  I.)     Trech«el,  Jo.  Pliil.  (Stud.  u.  KrlU  1&85.  P.  1.) 

/)  Commentaries  and  translations  of  Aristotle — De  duabus  nat  et  una  persona.  Quod  Trinitas 
'ttuasDens,  etc — De  consulatione  pbilo«opbiae,  ed.  IM/recht,  Curiae  1797.  and  often.  Ucbers.  v. 
fnHag,  Rtipa.  1794.— Opp.  ed.  Rota^  Bas.  1570s.— (Gervaisc)  Hist  de  Bouce.  Par.  1715.  2  Tli. 
B«9%»,  Ceniora  Bo£tbiL  (Opoacc  Th.  VI.  pi  148s8.)— f*.  Iland^  Boeth.  (Erscb.  u.  6rubor*s  EncykL 
v<^  XL  p.  S88M.)     Ou9L  Amr,  de  Boctbio.  DarmsL  1841. 

9)  Ds  arUbns  ao  diaciplinis  liberalinm  titt  Institutlo  ad  dir.  lectiones.  Ulst  Eccledae  tripartita. 
^«W  Eppt— Oppt  ed.  Garet.  Botbomag.  1679.  Ven.  1729.  2  Th.  t—Htdudlin,  ft.  Cassiod.  (Archlv.  f. 
KOweh.  182Si  p.  25998.  SSlsa.) 

*)/#'.  &  Auffu^Un,  de  catenli  PP.  graecia  in  N.  T.  Hal.  1762.  (^NoeucHi  Gommentt  ad  U 
«t  HsL  181T. 


134     ANCIENT  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  II.  IMPERIAL  CHUBCH.  A.  D.  81»-600. 

Latin  Chnrch  (i)  fh)m  sentences  taken  fh>m  the  more  ancient  fathers  by  Isido- 
ru8,  Bishop  of  HispalU  (d.  636),  and  another  more  complete,  and  on  account 
of  its  application  of  Aristotelian  formnlae  more  scientific,  was  compiled  for 
the  Greek  Church  by  the  monk  John  Damase^nvs  (d.  754).  The  latter 
also  collected  togetlier  the  various  decisions  which  had  been  given  by  the 
Ohurch  in  its  earlier  religious  controversies,  and  thus  settled  these  disputes 
for  his  Ghnrch  for  a  thousand  years  after  him.  (k)  A  Roman  catalogue  of 
apocryphal  and  rejected  works,  which  had  been  gradually  enlarging  from  the 
time  of  Ilorraisdas  (514-528),  and  had  finally  become  essentially  fixed  about 
the  middle  of  the  sixth  century,  exhibits  the  contracted  spirit  as  well  as  the 
state  of  criticism  at  that  time,  for  even  some  of  the  more  ancient  fathers  are 
rejected  as  apocryphal  because  they  were  inconsistent  with  some  Roman 
assertions,  or  did  not  correspond  with  the  later  orthodoxy.  (T) 


ClIAP.  ni.— SOCIAL  CONSTITUTION  OF  THE  OnURCH. 

Bibliotlicca  )uri8  can.  vetori^  op.  Guil  et  Ilenr.  JuntfUi,  Par.  1661.  2.  Th.  f.  Sitittler,  Geech.  il. 
can-  Rechts  bis  a.  d.  falsch.  Iridor.  Hal.  1T7S.  (Works,  ed.  by  Wdchter,  Stuttg.  1927,  vol.  I.)— />/<mcl% 
Oescb.  d.  kirchl.  Gesellschafts-Verf.  vol.  I.  p.  276n.  na»e^  de  Jure  ecc  P.  I.  p.  828s.  P.  IL  C 
Riffel,  Gcsch.  DanL  d.  Verb.  zw.  K.  n.  Staat  Mainz.  1886.  vol  I.  p.  11488. 

§  120.     Legislation  and  Books  of  Lau>, 

Ecclesiastical  laws  were  enacted  sometimes  by  synods  and  sometimes  by 
the  emperors.  The  first  idea  of  general  laws  for  the  whole  Church  seems  to 
have  been  derived  from  the  General  Councils,  with  whose  decisions  were 
soon  united  those  of  the  inferior  synods  and  the  canonical  institutes  of  a  few 
fathers,  which  individual  bishops  had  collected  for  their  private  direction, 
but  which  passed  into  general  use.  Such  collections  are  first  noticed  in  the 
Syuod  of  Chalcedon,  where,  however,  they  possessed  no  general  authority.  (<i) 
But  even  then  it  had  become  customary,  at  least  in  the  Greek  Church,  to 
regard  the  canons  of  certain  synods  as  possessing  the  authority  of  general 
laws.  This  agreement  seems  to  have  become  complete  in  the  sixth  century, 
but  it  was  not  until  the  second  canon  of  the  Trullan  Synod  (Quinisexta  692) 
that  the  constituent  parts  of  the  Greek  canon  law  which  had  long  been  in 
use,  were  recognized  as  legally  binding,  {h)  The  African  Church  at  the 
Council  of  Carthage,  419,  gave  its  sanction  to  a  collection  of  its  own  domes- 
tic canons,  {e)  which  was  gradually  accepted  as  a  part  of  the  general  eccleai- 


t)  Sententiarum  &  de  summo  bono  L  III.  comp.  %  167.  note  a. 

1c)  ni77^  yvuKrfOii  ■  a)  ra  ^iXo(ro^i«r(i,  /3)  ittpX  alpcVcwv,  y)  tkioffii  iiKpifi^s  T^t  opi^ 
Z6lov  iriirrtooT.  0pp.  ed.  Mich.  lAq^Un^  Par.  1712.  8.  Th.  C 

/)  Threefold  text  in  Manti  Tb.  YIII.  p.  ISSas.  Since  nincmar  of  Bheims  it  Is  eommonly  ^oted 
as  Pccrctum  Oola»it  (494),  tbns  by  Qratlan:  e.  8.  Dtot  XV.  comp.  Oieaeler,  KGesch.  yoL  L  Abttu 
II.  p.  8S8S.    [Davidnoti'a  transl.  vol.  II.  p.  110.  $  114  note  2.] 

a)  Kespccting  collectiona  called  apostolic :  See  $  67.  oomp.  J.  W,  BUkdL,  Geach.  Oea  KlrcbeA- 
rechta.  Gless.  laia  vol.  L 

V)  Acta  and  102  canons :  Manti  Th.  XI.  p.  927-1008. 

c)  JutteUi  Bibl.  Tb.  I.  808bs.    Manti  Tb.  III.  p.  69388. 


OHAP.  Ill  GOHSTrrunoN.  s  isa  theodobuh  a  justinian  coDsa    135 

Mtical  ]*w.    Of  the  Roman  Chnroh  of  the  time  of  the  Coancil  of  Chalcedon, 
we  only  know  that  in  its  collection  the  Nicaean  canons  were  mingled  with 
those  of  Sardica.    The  dvil  laws,  so  far  as  they  relate  to  ecclesiastical  affiiirs, 
may  generally  be  fomid  under  their  appropriate  titles  in  the  two  collections 
of  imperial  laws  called  Codex  Theodonanus^  438,  and  Codex  Justinianeus^ 
684,  and  the  Novels  attached  to  each.    The  efforts  of  Justinian  to  give  a 
scientific  form  to  political  and  civil  law,  must  have  had  a  considerable  infln-^ 
ence  npon  ecclesiastical  law.    John  SeholiiHticui^  successively  an  advocate,  a 
presbyter  at  Antioch,  and  the  Patriarch  of  Constantinople  (d.  578),  arranged 
the  canons  which  he  found  in  the  ordinary  collections,  together  with  the 
Beoond  and  third  epistles  of  Basil  relating  to  the  canons,  under  fifty  titles 
aooording  to  their  subjects,  (d)    This  digest,  on  account  of  its  adaptation  to 
general  use,  as  well  as  the  reputation  of  its  author,  soon  became  a  standard 
aothority  in  the  Greek  Church.    A  collection  of  civil  laws  relating  to  the 
Church,  prepared  by  this  some  John,  contains  extracts  from  the  ten  Novels 
ii  Justinian,  arranged  under  eighty-seven  chapters,  {e)    Another  collection, 
embracing  the  whole  ecclesiastical  legislation  of  Justinian,  sometimes  in  full 
and  sometimes  abridged,  together  with  an  appendix  containing  the  four 
Novels  of  Ileraclins,  has  been  erroneously  attributed  to  Theodore  Balsamon, 
hot  really  belongs  to  the  seventh  century.  (/)    The  practical  wants  of  the 
Church  called  forth  a  work  in  which  tlie  civil  laws  relating  to  the  Church 
(luftoc)  were  arranged  in  harmony  with  the  ecclesiastical  laws  {Kav6¥fs\  and 
which  has  since  been  called  the  Komocanon,    Under  the  fifty  titles  of  the 
collection  of  canons  by  Scholasticus,  the  corresponding  civil  laws  were  intro- 
duced, and  even  these  were  principally  derived  from  his  book,  {ff)    The  peni- 
tential laws  were  systematized,  and  their  severity  was  accommodated  to  the 
mSdness  of  his  age,  and  of  his  own  disposition,  by  John  the  Fatter  (i/?;(rrcvT^f), 
Patriarch  of  Constantinople  (585-595).  (A)     The  old  code  of  the  Roman 
Church,  ij)  called  by  Dionysius  Trahslatio  prisen,  was  gradually  increased 
md  strengthened  in  authority  after  the  Council  of  Chalcedon,  by  translations 
from  the  Greek  books  of  laws.    The  incompleteness  and  want  of  arrange- 
ment which  characterized  this  work,  induced  Dionysius  Exiguus,  a  Scythian 
iDd  a  Roman  monk,  to  revise  it,  and  to  form  a  now  code  (498-514).  (X)    The 
first  part  contains  a  faithful  translation  of  the  principal  articles  of  the  Greek 
ijnodal  laws,  tlie  canons  of  Sardica,  and  the  African  collection.    The  second 
ptrt  contains  all  the  decretals  which  could  then  be  found  at  Rome,  by  eight 
popes,  firom  Siricius  (d.  898)  to  Anastosius  II.  (d.  498).     This  Codex  Dionysii 


i)  /ntuai  BlbL  Tb.  IL  p.  499^402. 

^Imnymy^  rtap&y  9iard^t9ty.    tJnprinted. 

f)  Twr  iucX.  9tard^*tnf  ffv?i\oy/i,  JuMeUi  BibL  Th.  II.  p.  1217-1478.—/*.  /?.  BUner,  de 
(•OMttoBlbfiif  caoonnm  Ece.  gnecM.  Bor.  1827. 

iDJudelU  BibL  Th.  II.  p.  60»-672. 

A)'AKoXoud(a  Ktd  rd^it  M  4^ofio\oyovfi4ywv.  The  exUtlng  EcconMon  foroiod  from  later 
ft^Him  b  in  Morini  Comm.  hist  de  diflciplina  in  adininistr.  Bacr.  poenitcntiac.  (Par.  1^1.  f)  Von. 

i7nLr.p.  ei6M. 

i)  In  leon.  Oppi  Th.  III.  p.  4786&  and  ManH  Th.  TI.  p.  1105s8. 

t)  Ed.  Fr.  Pilhoeui,  Par.  1«S7.  t  JutteUi  BlbL  Th.  I.  p.  »78a.  coixip.  BulUrin.  D».  in  Loocl 
0nkTh.IILp.l74flt. 


136  ANCIXBTT  CHXTECH  BISTORT.  PXB.  IL  IMPERIAL  CHURCa  A.  D.  81ft-«ML 

was  mnoh  ftyored  by  the  popes,  and  became  a  standard  legal  authority  not 
only  in  the  Roman  Ghoroh,  whose  domestic  laws  were  found  in  it,  but  in 
almost  all  the  West  Later  decretals  were  therefore  gradually  appended  to 
it.  The  book  of  laws  for  the  Spanish  Ohorch  originated  in  the  first  half  of 
the  sixth  century,  and  wto  probably  revised  by  Isidore  of  Hispnlis^  whose 
name  it  bears,  but  continual  additions  have  been  made  to  it  since  his  time.  (2) 
It  contains  in  the  first  part  not  only  the  greater  part  of  the  Greek  synodal 
laws,  but  the  canons  of  the  Spanish  and  GaUican  councils,  and  in  the  second 
part,  besides  the  decretals  of  the  Dionysian  code,  a  few  letters  from  tbe 
popes  to  the  Spanish  and  Galilean  bishops.  Other  systematic  compilations 
made  during  this  period  are  of  less  importance.  They  are  the  Breviarivm 
of  Fulgentiu8  Ferrandus,  a  deacon  of  Carthage  (about  547),  a  work  which 
had  no  dependence  upon  the  Dionysian  code,  (w)  and  the  Concordia  of 
CrcsconitUy  an  African  (about  600),  which  was  an  analysis  of  that  code 
according  to  its  contents,  (n) 

§  121.     The  Roman  Empire, 

The  cultivation  of  the  fine  arts  had  entirely  ceased  from  the  time  of  Oon- 
stontine,  and  no  ornaments  could  be  found  for  his  new  city  and  his  trium- 
phal arch  in  the  very  forum  of  Kome,  but  by  spoiling  the  ancient  monuments. 
Nearly  the  whole  intellectual  energy  of  the  age  was  enlisted  in  the  service 
of  the  Church,  so  that  the  only  science  which  seemed  to  flourish  without 
ecclesiastical  influence  was  jurisprudence.  In  consequence  of  the  founding 
of  Constantinople,  the  whole  power  of  the  empire  was  directed  to  the  East, 
and  after  the  division  made  by  Theodosius  (895)  the  East  and  the  West  re- 
mained permanently  separated.  But  so  perfectly  had  the  various  nations 
conquered  by  the  Komans  been  made  to  feel  as  one  people,  that  both  these 
divisions  regarded  themselves  as  only  different  parts  of  the  one  great  empire- 
While  the  Germanic  nations  stormed  at  the  portals  of  the  West,  and  even 
when  they  broke  through  them  in  the  fifth  century,  the  civil  constitution  and 
the  habits  of  the  people  remained  Roman  under  the  long  dominion  of  the 
Goths  in  Italy.  The  East  was  governed  by  a  lifeless  and  rigid  mechanism, 
the  moving  spring  of  which  was  at  Constantinople.  The  extinction  of  the 
reigning  families  and  the  ascendency  of  the  army,  rendered  abortive  the  fre- 
quent efforts  to  establisli  a  popular  hereditary  monarchy,  but  the  want  of  this 
was  in  some  degree  supplied  by  the  imperial  nomination  of  colleagues  and 
successors.  But  the  m^esty  of  the  Roman  people  and  the  confidence  that 
they  wore  destined  to  universal  dominion  had  been  transferred  to  their  rulers. 
In  this  form  it  wu3  now  consecrated  by  the  Church,  and  systematically  de- 
fended by  arguments  supplied  by  jurisprudence.  Amid  all  the  agitations  pro- 
duced by  dynastic  changes,  this  idea  of  an  imperial  government  appointed  by 
Grod  for  supreme  dominion  on  earth  became  profoundly  fixed  in  the  hearts 
of  the  people. 

/)  Collectlo  canonnm  Eccl  UlttpanUe.  Matrit  1808.  t    Epistolae  decretales  ao  rescr.  Rom.  PoottH* 
cam.  Mstr.  1821.  f.  (od.  A.  OoruMlm.) 

m)  JuHtUi  BibL  Th.  L  p.  456m.     n)  JutUUi  BlbL  Tb.  L  Append,  p.  886a. 


CHAF.UL    CONSTITUTION.    1 182.  BELiLTIONB  OF  CHIIBCH  Jb  BTATK      137 

§  122.    Power  of  the  Emperor  oter  the  Church, 

The  emperors,  accustomed  to  exercise  the  power,  not  only  of  an  absolute 
soTereign  bat  of  a  supreme  pontiff,  endeavored  to  sell  their  favor  to  the 
Church  at  the  price  of  its  ancient  liberties.    A  decisive  influence  was  gained 
hj  them  in  the  right  of  nominating  the  bishops,  especially  the  metropolitan. 
The  CSmroh  on  the  other  hand  was  anxious  to  compel  all  its  members  to  ob- 
terre  the  well  defined  and  slow  process  of  a  regular  advancement  from  the 
inferior  to  the  superior  stations,  and  disapproved  of  all  translations  of  a 
bishop  from  one  diocese  to  another,  as  nothing  less  than  spiritual  adultery. 
The  emperor  frequently  entertained  the  appeals  of  those  who  considered 
themselyea  aggrieved  by  the  bishops.    A  regular  system  of  punishments  was 
then  appointed  by  the  Ohnrch  for  all  who  should  thus  appeal  from  its  deci- 
aons  to  the  emperor,  (a)    The  emperors  called  together  the  general  councils 
ci  the  Church,  presided  in  them  through  their  envoys,  and  published  their 
decrees  as  laws  of  the  empire,  (b)    As  none  but  the  Catholic  Church  was  en- 
titled to  civil  privileges,  when  different  bishops  were  opposed  to  each  other, 
the  emperor  himself  was  obliged  to  decide  which  of  them  belonged  to  the 
orthodox  church.     Hence  many  laws,  even  on  matters  of  doctrine,  were 
enacted  by  them,  and  those  who  obtained  their  ends  by  court  favor  en- 
ooorsged  them  in  this  and  commended  them  for  it.    The  imperial  edicts  were 
ibo  pnblished  by  being  read  in  the  churches,  (c)    Many  bishops  who  longed 
for  the  imperial  favor  were  pliant  tools  in  the  hands  of  ambitious  rulers,  and 
the  Italian  clergy  had  some  reason  to  suspect  that  a  Greek  bishop,  for  his 
own  emolument,  could  be  induced  to  grant,  without  fear  or  shame,  any 
request  which  might  be  made  of  him.  (d)    The  emperors,  however,  were  fre- 
({oently  the  mere  tools  of  an  ecclesiastical  party,  and  their  laws  for  the  regu- 
lation of  doctrines,  when  not  confirmed  by  the  authority  of  the  Church,  sel- 
dom survived  their  authors.    The  freedom  of  the  Church  never  wanted  bold 
umI  sDoceasfnl  advocates,  and  though  it  was  practically  violated  in  every  pos- 
«We  way,  its  legality  was  always  acknowledged  by  the  emperors  themselves,  (e) 
The  people  generally  regarded  it  as  the  highest  principle  of  law,  that  God 
ba>  bestowed  all  power  on  earth  upon  the  monarchy  and  the  priesthood,  but 
thii  he  had  assigned  to  each  of  these  certain  immovable  boundaries  which 
neither  could  transgress  withont  guilt  and  peril.  (/) 

§  123.    Power  of  the  Church  oter  the  State, 

The  severity  of  the  ancient  Roman  laws  was  much  mitigated  by  the  influ- 
wce  of  Christianity  whenever  they  did  not  fall  in  with  the  prejudices  of 
^  Chittch,  and  thus  a  way  was  prepared  for  an  acknowledgment  of  the 

•)  Omc  AfUiodL  cftD.  12.    {Land4>n^  ]>.  88.  can.  12.]    Conntant,  I.  can.  6. 

()  Omt,  CoMtant  L  Ep.  ad  Tbeodoa.  {ManH  Th.  IIL  p.  66T.) 

e)  L  Ml  Ood.  ThMtd.  da  rebna  eocL  (XVI,  2.)  et  Oothofredna  ad  h.  I. 

')lfellM<Th,IX.p.l58w 

<)  Ob  tb«  other  band  Constantfne^  eplsoopaey  (Euseb.  vita  Const.  IV,  24.)  was  referred  to  with 
^  inM  leiDblaiio*  of  argoment  aa  was  used  for  the  sovereignty  of  the  blshopa :  Soeom.  I,  IT. 

/)  Q«l«las  L  ad  AnaiUrinin  a.  4M.  (MdnH  Th.  VIIL  p.  81.) 


138     ANCIENT  CHUBCH  HISTORY.  P£S.  IL  DCPESIAI.  CHUBCH.  A.  D.  812-800. 

general  rights  of  man.  (a)  Some  bishops  went  so  far  as  to  oppose  even  capital 
pnnisliments,  on  the  ground  that  their  barbarity  was  inconsistent  with  reason 
and  humanity,  (b)  The  right  of  asylnm  which  had  formerly  been  conceded 
to  a  few  of  the  ancient  temples  was  extended  to  all  Christian  churches,  and 
proved  a  serious  detriment  to  the  administration  of  Justice.  But  Chrytostom 
lived  to  enjoy  the  triumph  of  seeing  the  very  minister  whose  exorbitant 
power  once  threatened  to  abolish  this  privilege,  clinging  to  the  altar  for  his 
oitn  protection,  (e)  Great  political  power  was  acquired  by  the  bishops  in 
consequence  of  their  personal  influence  among  the  people,  and  the  devotion 
of  the  emperors  to  theological  controversies.  The  law  gave  them  a  certain 
right  to  superintend  the  affairs  of  the  congregations  both  in  town  and 
country ;  they  also  possessed  a  certain  right,  frequently  usurped  but  finally 
regulated  by  law,  of  acting  as  intercessors  for  those  who  were  unfortunate  or 
criminal,  and  a  certain  kind  of  patronage  was  conceded  to  them  for  all  per^ 
Bonae  mUerdhiles.  (d)  The  Church  undertook  the  censorship  of  the  morals 
of  civil  ftmctionaries,  and  summoned  to  their  bar  those  who  were  above  hu- 
man enactments,  (e)  No  one  dared  to  meet  the  fury  of  a  Governor  of  the 
Pentapolis  but  Syncsius  the  bishop.  When  a  whole  city  had  fallen  a  sacii- 
fice  to  the  wrath  of  Theodositis  /.,  Ambrose  ventured  to  give  utterance  to 
the  monarch's  conscience,  and  the  royal  offender  was  excluded  from  the 
Church.  (/)  When  an  unlimited  power  was  exercised  by  the  civil  mien, 
the  Church  thus  became  a  safe  retreat  for  popular  freedom,  and  saints  played 
the  part  of  tribunes  of  the  people.  Sometimes  even  royal  honors  were  be- 
stowed upon  bishops,  and  what  was  at  first  accorded  by  pious  humility, 
pious  arrogance  took  care  to  demand  and  retain.  From  the  truth  that  heavenly 
things  were  superior  to  earthly,  the  inference  was  drawn  that  the  hierarchy 
should  be  greater  than  the  monarchy,  and  should  have  precedence  in  earthly 
dignity,  (g)  In  his  City  of  God,  the  secular  power  is  described  by  Augustine 
as  an  irrational  despotism  which  commenced  with  a  fratricide,  and  tends  to 
subversion  that  it  may  give  place  to  the  celestial  kingdom. 

§  124.    Eeclesiastieal  Jurisdiction, 

Strydt,  de  orig.  ct  ura  Jnrisdictlonis  ecc.  HaL  1710.  4  (Opnsec  Tb.  XIV.)  IT.  M.  nAemOtM 
Hist  Jurisd.  eec.  Dss.  III.  ITTSas.  4.  Bruno  Schilling^  de  orig.  jarisd.  eoc  Id  caiuis  civil.  Lpa.  182&.  4. 
C.  F.  A.  Jungk^  de  Orig.  et  jirogressu  episcopaliajad.  in  caosis  civiL  Uiconun  nsqae  od  Juadiilan. 
Ber.  1882. 

Although  the  sentence  of  the  episcopal  court,  in  its  capacity  of  a  court  of 

a)  EM€b.  YiU  Const  IV,  26.  L.  S.  Cod.  Theod.  de  poen.  (IX.  40.)— C  O.  de  Rhoer^  Dtaert  d« 
elfectu  rol  chr.  in  Jarispr.  Bom.  Gron.  177&  IT.  0.  d€  Meywnburg^  de  chr.  reL  vl  et  effeota  in  jot 
civile  (itpeclatim  Institt  L  L)  Ootting.  182a  4.  Troplong^  de  I'lnflaence  da  Christ  snr  le  droit  elTfl 
des  Roniains.  Par.  l&4a 

h)  Ambrag.  £p.  29.  26.  (al  61.  02.)  AufftuHn,  Ep.  188. 184. 15&— I.  15  et  16.  Cbd.  Thsod,  d« 
pocn.  (IX.  40.) 

c)  Cod.  Tfisod.  de  his,  qui  ad  Ecc.  conniglnat  (IX,  45.)    Soerat  YI,  6.    Soaom.  Till,  7. 

d)  Cone.  Sardic.  can.  7.  Ambroe.  de  Offic  II,  29.  QmsL  22.  24  87iw  80s.  C.  d«  Epiaa 
andientia.  (I,  4.) 

e)  Cone  Areial  a.  814  o.  7.  Oregor.  Nai.  Orat  17.  (Th.  L  p.  271.) 

/)  Synesii  Epc  578.  72.  89.— i^H^  XI,  13.  ThaodoreL  V,  17.  ^^moim.  YII,  24  L.  18.  Cod,  Tkttd. 
de  pocn.  (IX,  40.)  Comp.  T.  L.  F.  Ta/tl^  de  Thessalonica.  Ber.  1889.  p.  XLYIIss. 

g)  ConstUt  aposL  II,  84  Chrytotik  de  Saoerd.  Ill,  1.— i9m(p.  So9§ri  YiU  liarttnL  a  Sa 


CDAP.  IIL  CONSTITUTION.  1 184.  ECCLES.  JUBISDICTION.  S  129.  PBOPEBTT.   1 39 

arbitration  poesessed  a  certain  legal  anihority,  (a)  its  voluntary  jurisdiction 
was  not  mneh  needed  under  a  Christian  government,  and  after  tLo  sixth 
eentoiy  it  was  lees  resorted  to.  The  claim  that  all  causes  relating  to  mar- 
riage and  to  wills  (causae  roixtae)  should  be  decided  there,  was  generally 
nsKted  by  the  secular  tribunals,  but  the  obstacles  to  marriage  laid  down  in 
the  Mosaic  law  were  recognized  by  the  civil  code,  and  were  sometimes  ex- 
tended even  to  spiritual  relationships.  Divorces  very  rarely,  and  the  marriage 
ci  divorced  persons  still  less  frequently,  were  permitted  by  the  episcopal 
ooorts.  These  first  became  the  ordinary  tribunals  for  the  clergy  in  civil  causes 
about  the  time  of  Justinian  I.,  (b)  but  the  municipal  courts  continued  to  exer- 
cise jurisdiction  as  at  first  in  criminal  causes  until  Valentin ian  III.  gave  (452) 
the  plaintiff  the  privilege  of  choosing  before  which  of  these  courts  his  cause 
ahoold  be  tried,  (e)  Justinian  I.  assigned  particular  parts  of  every  such 
criminal  cause  to  each  of  these  courts,  (d)  and  Heraclius  (623)  entirely  ex- 
dnded  them  from  the  municipal  courts,  (e)  According  to  ecclesiastical  usage 
it  was  thought  unbecoming  for  a  clergyman  to  appear  in  his  own  cause  cither 
as  plaintiff  or  defendant  before  a  civil  tribunal.  (/)  When  cited  before  the 
emperor  the  bishops  would  indeed  make  their  appearance,  but  a  sentence  of 
eondemnation  was  not  readily  acknowledged  except  where  a  synod  concurred 
in  it  In  all  matters  purely  ecclesiastical  the  episcopal  courts  and  synods  were 
regarded  as  the  only  competent  tribunals,  (g) 

§  125.     Church  Property, 

ihwae  a  CosU  (Richard  Simon.)  Hist  de  rorigine  et  da  progr^s  den  revenos  ecc  Frcf.  1684.  21. 
flumatiin.  ($  9.  note  b.) 

The  clergy  were  supported,  especially  under  the  first  Christian  emperors, 
bj  revenues  supplied  by  the  government,  by  a  portion  of  the  property  they 
inherited  from  the  old  temples,  and  by  ecclesiastical  possessions  falling  to 
them  from  heretics.    Though  they  often  preached  to  the  people  that  they  had 
i  divine  right  to  the  first-fruits  and  the  tithes,  their  preaching  was  not  much 
ngarded.  (a)    But  when  Gonstantine  confirmed  (821)  to  the  people  a  com- 
plete right  to  devise  property  at  pleasure  to  the  Church,  such  bequests  be- 
cune  an  inexhaustible  source  of  wealth,  (h)     It  was  not  long  before  one 
eoold  scarcely  die  without  being  reminded  of  his  duty  to  the  Church,  and  a 
law  become  necessary  in  which  the  clergy  were  forbidden  to  solicit  such  be- 
laeftd  (870).  (e)    As  this  wealth,  however,  was  possessed  by  the  Church  in 
tnut  for  the  poor,  it  was  looked  upon  with  much  affection.    All  institutions 
of  benevolence  originated  in  the  Church,  (d)    Its  wealth  contributed  to  its 
power  and  freedom.    The  management  of  the  funds  was  generally  in  the 

•)  StaoM.  1, 9.    Tb«  legal  passages  in  Base,  d«  Jore  ecc  P.  L  p.  SSa. 

>)  AW.  83c  Praet  et  S  1.  yov.  128.  c.  21. 

c)  L  47.  Cod.  Tfuod.  de  Episc  (XVI,  2.)  N<yto.  1.  de  Episc  Jadlclo  In  Aniani  CoIlecUone. 

tf)  ^Mi  188.  e.  21. 1 1.    «)  JuUMi  Blbl.  Th.  IL  p.  1861a. 

f)  Oime.  Carth.  III.  a  897.  can.  9.  IV.  a.  419.  can.  19.  Chalc.  can.  9. 

f )  L  L  OnI.  Theod.  de  reL  (XYI,  IL)  JuiUni  N<^t.  128.  c  21.  f  2. 

•)  B^ngkam^  Orlgg.  eocL  Y,  6.    &)  L.  4.  Cod,  Theod.  de  Epbc  (XVI,  2.) 

c)  L  SOl  Cod.  Theod.  de  EpIsc  Comp.    nUron.  £p.  ai  (a1.  2.)  ad  NepoUan. 

'iLiCbr/.  77Wa<i.deEpiiG.(XVI,2.)    CMatii^lSL.%Vl, 


]  40  ANCIENT  CnURCH  HISTOBY.  PER.  IL  IMPEBIAL  CUUBCH.  A.  D.  911-900, 

hands  of  the  hishop,  the  distrihotion  of  them  was  regulated  hy  certain  pre- 
cise forms,  and  the  alienation  of  the  property  was  controlled  hy  prescrihed 
conditions.  Every  church  was  the  legal  heir  of  all  the  property  which  its 
intestate  clergyman  had  accumulated  from  ecclesiastical  revenues.  Whatever 
the  Church  possessed  was  scoured  hy  an  investment  in  real  estate.  This  was 
variously  taxed  according  to  the  disposition  and  wants  of  the  different  gov- 
ernments, hut  it  was  usually  exempted  fr6m  extraordinary,  personal,  and  im- 
proper hurdens.  («) 

§  126.     The  CortQregation  and  the  Cltrgy, 

As  the  clergy  were  generally  independent  of  the  favor  of  the  people  by 
their  ecclesiastical  possessions,  the  congregations  were  entirely  shut  out  from 
all  participation  in  the  government  of  the  Church.  Sometimes  the  people 
still  gave  effect  to  their  wishes  in  a  tumultuous  manner,  when  a  bishop  was 
chosen,  and  a  certain  influence  was  exercised  on  such  occasions  by  distinguished 
citizens,  and  was  legalized  by  Justinian  I.,  but  it  was  disapproved  of  by  the 
second  Synod  of  Nicaea  (787).  (a)  In  the  West,  however,  and  especiaDy  in 
Home,  the  people  asserted  their  right  to  participate  in  elections,  and  the  power 
of  the  clergy  was  too  dependent  upon  popular  opinion  to  allow  of  many  im- 
portant privileges  being  withheld  from  the  congregations.  Even  then  some 
voices  continued  to  be  raised  in  favor  of  a  priesthood  of  all  Christians  before 
God.  (6)  The  clergy  succeeded  in  throwing  off  the  burdens  which  the  State 
had  imposed  upon  it,  and  a  series  of  civil  enactments  became  necessary  to 
prevent  the  entrance  of  too  many  persons  into  ecclesiastical  offices.  These 
required  that  no  person  should  be  ordained  except  to  supply  the  place  of  a 
deceased  clergyman,  and  none  who  owed  any  service  to  a  master  or  to  the 
state  without  the  consent  of  those  to  whom  it  was  due.  An  unsuccessful  at- 
tempt was  made  to  procure  a  law  by  which  none  but  indigent  persons  on 
whom  the  state  had  no  claim  should  be  ordained  to  the  sacred  office.  On  the 
other  hand  the  spiritual  power  was  frequently  strengthened  by  the  ordination 
of  distinguished  philosophers,  advocates,  and  high  civil  officers.  In  such 
cases  the  law  required  that  all  landed  property  burdened  with  obligations  to 
the  state  should  be  surrendered  to  the  municipal  authorities.  The  clergy 
were  principally  supported  from  the  ftmds  of  the  Church,  but  even  as  late  as 
the  fifth  century  some  ecclesiastical  laws  recommended  that  they  should  sus- 
tain themselves  by  agricultural  or  other  pursuits,  (c)  In  the  fourth  century 
the  ordination  of  deaconesses  was  looked  upon  as  a  Montanistio  custom,  and 
after  the  fifth  their  office  was  in  the  West  entirely  abolished,  (d)  The  choice 
of  all  his  clergy  came  into  the  hands  of  the  bishop,  although  the  presbyters 
once  more  augmented  their  authority  by  their  attempts  in  some  instances  to 
become  independent  pastors  both  in  town  and  country.    In  this  way  they 


€)  L  1.  Cod.  Tkeod.  de  annoDa.  (XL,  1.)  L.  15. 19^  21fl8.  Cbd.  Theod,  de  oxtraord.  (XI,  16^)  I*  tm, 
ISea.  Ood.  Tkeod.  de  Epbo. 

a)  Justin.  Nov.  123.  c  1.  JTotJ.  187.  c  2.  Gone  Nlc  IT.  can.  8. 
V)  AugwU  de  Olv.  Dei.  XX,  10.  AmbroHiut^  ad  Ephea.  4, 11. 
e)  Cone,  Oarth.  a.  419.  can.  52.  58. 
d)  AmbrotioHer  In  I.  Tim.  8,  11.  Cone.  JSpaonmiM,  can.  2L 


CHAP.  IIL    CONSTITUTION.    §  126-  CLERGY.    §  127.  PATRIARCHS.  141 

hoped  to  attain  the  position  of  the  conntiy  bishops  who  had  been  supplanted 
ever  since  the  fonrth  centnry,  and  that  the  episcopal  name  might  become  less 
commcm  and  more  important.  Other  presbyters,  together  with  the  deacons 
as  the  clergy  of  the  bishop's  chnroh  (cathedralis),  constituted  the  bishop's 
priyy  oonncil.  One  of  these  was  chosen  an  Archpresbyter,  to  preside  over 
the  pnblio  worship,  and  another  was  appointed  an  Archdeacon,  to  preside 
orer  the  eoisoopal  conrt.  (e) 

§  127.     The  Patriarchs. 

J>.  Blond^  traits  hist  de  la  Primaat^  en  Tdgl.  Oen.  164t.  t  J.  Morini  Exercitt  ecc  ct  bibl.  (Ds. 
L  de  Patriarch,  et  PrlnuU.  origg.)  Par.  1669.  t  Janu9y  de  origg.  Patriarch,  chr.  Dgb.  IL  Vit  1713.  4 
Thomuutini  I,  7-INl 

The  great  dioceses  and  prerogatives  of  the  Bishops  of  Eome,  Alexandria ^ 
and  Antioch  were  recognized  at  Nicaea,  on  the  ground  of  their  being  estab- 
lished npon  usage,  (a)    At  the  Synod  of  Constantinople  (881)  the  Bishop  of 
Few  Rome  was  associated  with  these,  in  rank  next  to  the  Roman  bishop,  (b) 
His  diocese  was  continually  increasing,  but  at  Chalccdon  (451)  it  was  consti- 
tuted of  Thrace,  perhaps  already  a  part  of  it,  (c)  the  more  distant  part  of 
Pontus,  and  Asia  Minor.    To  him  also  was  granted  the  privilege  of  receiving 
oomplaints  against  the  metropolitans  of  other  dioceses,  {d)  since  the  foreign 
bisbopa  who  were  continually  going  to  and  from  the  imperial  court  formed 
around  him  an  almost  perpetual  council,  (e)    As  by  this  arrangement  the 
Metropolitans  of  Ephesus,  Heraclea  and  New-Caesarea  were  subjected  to  his 
Jonsdiction,  to  save  their  dignities  from  detriment,  a  new  ecclesiastical  office 
was  introduced,  to  which  the  name  of  archbishop  or  exarch  was  applied.    In 
the  fifth  century,  however,  the  name  of  Patriarch  which  had  before  com- 
monly been  applied  to  all  bishops  was  exclusively  used  to  designate  them. 
To  the  patriarchs  belonged  the  duty  of  ordaining  the  metropolitans,  con- 
vening synods  of  their  whole  dioceses,  bringing  to  an  issue  causes  of  more 
Uitn  ordinary  importance  (causae  majores),  and  deciding  finally  all  cases  of 
ippeal  which  might  be  submitted  to  them.    These  four  great  dioceses  which 
b  the  East  alone  corresponded  tolerably  well  with  the  great  provinces  of  the 
empire  were  gradually  made  to  include  every  part  of  the  Church.    Some 
huhops,  however,  especially  in  the  West,  and  in  the  East  all  in  the  island  of 
Cyprus,  preserved  their  independence.    The  Bishop  of  Jemsalem  was  reck- 
oned at  Nicaea,  as  a  mark  of  honorable  respect,  among  the  great  bishops,  and 
tfter  a  long  struggle  he  succeeded  in  throwing  off  the  jurisdiction  of  the 
Metropolitan  of  Caesarea,  and  at  Chalcedon  received  Palestine  as  an  inde- 
pendent diocese.  (/)    The  exorbitant  and  much  abused  power  of  the  Alex- 
indrian  bishop  was  broken  at  Chalcedon.    The  two  Eastern  patriarchates 
▼ere  tlso  stripped  of  their  power  in  consequence  of  the  Monophysites  and 

«)  /Vrtert,  T.  ITnpr.  d.  Archldiac  Hildesh.  1743. 

•)  Cbne.  Nic  can.  6.    \>)  Cone  CorutanL  L  can.  8.    c)  Thus  according  to  Socrat  II.  ecc  V,  & 
^  C(me.  Chalcedon^  can.  88.  et  9. 

«)  JwroaoT  iw^fiovffa.    Cone.  Chalc  Actio.  IV.  {Manti  Th.  VII.  p.  n%.y-J.  &  VaUr,  t.  d. 
•^^r8.   (KHtet  Arehlv.  1828.  P.  a) 
/)  Omc  jrSe.  can.  7.  Otmc  Chalc  Actio  TIL  i3fansi  Th.  VIL  p.  181a».) 


142     ANCIENT  CUUBCH  UISTOBY.  FEB.  IL  IMPEBIAL  CHUBCH.  A.  D.  812-80a 

Arabians.  The  Bishops  of  Old  and  New  Rome  alone  stood  as  the  representi^ 
tives  of  the  Eastern  and  Western  divisions  of  the  empire,  and  watched  etch 
other  with  a  jealous  eye.  The  Patriarch  of  Constantinople  was  generallj 
powerful  on  account  of  the  favor  of  the  emperor,  bat  he  was  also  the  subject 
of  the  imperial  caprice,  while  the  Roman  bishop  was  much  more  indepen- 
dent, in  consequence  of  his  political  position,  and  hence  often  became  the 
champion  of  ecclesiastical  freedom  and  the  prevailing  orthodoxy.  When  John 
the  Faster  (after  587)  assumed  the  title  of  an  cecumenical  bishop,  Gregory  the 
Great  pronounced  such  a  name  unchristian,  and  in  opposition  to  it  took  for  him- 
self the  more  Christian  designation  of  a  servant  of  the  servants  of  Ood ;  Greg- 
ory's successors,  with  more  sincerity,  soon  after  assumed  the  name  of  a  Uni- 
versal Bishop,  {g)  Neither  title  was  at  that  time  entirely  unknown.  In  the 
edict  of  the  usurper,  Phocas,  an  acknowledgment  was  made,  simply  from 
political  and  personal  considerations,  that  the  Roman  Church  was  entitled  to 
the  first  rank.  (A)  Both  these  patriarchs  were  successful  in  their  own  peca- 
lior  spheres,  but  the  same  political  events  which  reduced  the  territories  of  the 
one  proportionally  enlarged  those  of  the  other. 

§  128.     The  Roman  BUhoprie  he/ore  Leo. 

Epp.  Bom.  Pontiflcum  a  S.  Clemente  nsqae  ad  Innoc  IIL  ed.  ConMant  Par.  1721.  rep.  Behomk^' 
mann,  Gott  1796.  Th.  L  (until  482.)— C^  SalmatU,  Libror.  d«  Primatu  Papae  P.  I.  c  apparata.  I* 
B.  1645.  4. 

The  Roman  bishop  exercised  a  metropolitan  jurisdiction  over  the  ten 
suburbicarian  provinces,  which  was  as  far  as  the  political  district  of  Rome 
extended,  (a)  while  the  metropolitanates  of  the  diocese  of  Italia^  especially 
Milan,  under  Ambrosius  and  his  successors,  claimed  to  be  fully  equal  to  him 
within  their  respective  dioceses.  But  Rome  was  the  only  see  which  could 
claim  to  be  apostolic,  and  was  almost  the  only  medium  of  ecclesiastical  connec- 
tion with  the  East.  The  high  reputation  which  it  possessed  with  respect  to 
apostolical  traditions,  was  so  successfully  and  dispassionately  used  in  the  con- 
troversies of  the  East,  tliat  the  party  which  had  the  favor  of  Rome  mi^t 
generally  be  sure  of  ultimate  victory.  Uence,  her  opinion  and  her  decision 
as  a  mediator  was  continually  sought  for  and  as  readily  given.  And  even 
when  her  interference  was  disregarded,  as  in  the  case  of  Chrysostom,  it  was 
always  in  behalf  of  humanity  and  the  people.  In  consequence  of  its  attach- 
ment to  the  Nicaean  creed  when  the  whole  Eastern  Church  was  Arian,  East 
Jllyria  sought  a  connection  with  the  Roman  Church,  and  the  Bishop  of 
Thessalonica  was  regarded  as  a  Roman  vicar.  This  same  state  of  aflSun 
made  the  Roman  court  at  the  Council  of  Sardica  (847)  a  Court  of  Cassation, 
for  the  reception  of  appeals  in  the  case  of  bishops,  (b)  The  Eastern 
churches,  when  they  were  so  disposed,  and  when  united  among  themsdves, 

g)  Oregor.  I.  Y.  Ep.  ISss.  YII,  838S.— (7.  M.  I^df^  d«  titolo  Patr.  oecamenlci,  porno  oridla,  1788.  L 
{Tempe  I/elc.  Th.  IV.  Sect  I.  p.  9988.) 

k)  Anutias.  In  Vita  Bonlfacti  IIL  PatUua  Dlac  gestaLongob.  IV,  87. 

a)  KorthoU,  <1e  Ecc  suburblcariis.  Lpa.  17808.  4.  Dtoeceals  Eomae :  Campania,  ThnacJi  at  Urn- 
brla,  Plccnum  Buborblcarlam,  SlcUla,  Apalla  et  Calabria,  Bnittii  et  Lacania,  Samnlom,  Saidiai^  Car- 
alca,  Valeria. 

^)  Cone,  Sard.  can.  8  et  fi. 


CHAP.  IIL    OONSTTTUTION.    |  tSS.  BOMAN  SEE.    S 129- L^O  THE  GREAT.      143 


y.i 


nerer  hesitated  to  disregard  the  interference  of  the  Roman  bishop,  and  the 
Bynodi  of  Nicaea  and  Constantinople  were  entirely  independent  of  liis  influ- 
ence; bat  when  the  patriarchs  contended  with  each  other,  or  with  the  impe- 
rial court,  his  powerftd  friendship  was  generally  sought  by  both  parties,  and 
was  often  purchased  by  concessions.  From  observing  these  facts,  Innocent  I, 
became  coaiTinced  that  even  in  his  day,  nothing  in  the  whole  Christian  world 
could  be  brought  to  a  dedsion  without  the  cognizance  of  the  Roman  see,  and 
that,  especially  in  matters  of  faith,  all  bishops  were  under  the  necessity  of 
St.  Peter,  (c)  The  position  of  the  Roman  bishops  in  the  state, 
that  of  powerful  subjects  who  could  be  judged  only  by  the  emperor  him- 
sdlf^  (df  but  who,  as  in  the  case  of  Liberius  for  his  defence  of  the  Nicaean 
creed,  might  sometimes  be  abused  by  him.  (e)  But,  although  the  glory  sur- 
rounding the  apostolic  chair  had  already  become  y  attractive,  that  those  who 
contended  for  it  sometimes  pressed  toward  it  over  the  bodies  of  their  com- 
petitors, it  was  still  the  subject  of  derision  and  complaint  among  the  hea- 
then. (/)  The  recollection  that  this  worldly  glory  commenced  only  in  the 
time  of  Constantine,  gave  occasion  to  the  remark,  that  Sylvester  (314-886) 
lived  long  enough  to  do  and  witness  what  was  suitable  for  a  Roman  bishop, 
according  to  more  modern  views. 

§  129.    Leo  the  Great,  440-461. 

L  LtomU  Jf.  Opp.  ad.  Patch.  Quemtel,  Logd  1700. 2  Tb.  £  P.etK  BaUerirU,  Yen.  1T58-67. 
tTh.£ 

IL  W.  A.  Arendt^  Leo  d.  Or.  a.  &  Zeit  Mainz.  1886.  O.  PerihA,  P.  Leo*B  I.  Leben  n.  Lehren. 
Jn.  184S. — Grie^Mck,  Da.  locos  commones  theoL  collectoA  ex  Leone  li.  sistena.  IlaL  1768.  (Oposcc 
«d.  GabUr,  Tb.  L  ^  4Saa.) 

Leo  /.,  justly  called  the  Great,  whether  reference  is  had  to  his  character 
18  a  prince,  or  as  a  teacher  of  the  Church  in  his  day,  was  the  real  founder  of 
the  subsequent  greatness  of  the  Roman  see.    Hitherto  it  had  owed  more  to 
its  peculiar  circumstances  than  to  the  power  and  sagacity  of  its  bishops. 
What  he  now  did  was  fW>m  a  well-defined  aim,  and  a  clear  presage  of  a  more 
future.    Regarding  the  Roman  Church  as  in  possession  of  the  true 
from  the  Apostle  Peter,  he  looked  upon  it  as  the  rock  on  which 
tibe  Catholic  Church  was  built,  and  upon  the  Roman  bishop  as  appointed  by 
God  to  be  the  head  of  the  whole  Church,  and  to  have  the  care  of  its  inter- 
ests.   Humbly  conscious  of  his  personal  unworthiness  for  such  an  office,  he 
proudly  trusted  that  Peter  himself  acted  through  him.    He  retained  a  firm 
bold  1^>on  the  opposing  Illyrian  Church,  by  the  protection  he  gave  to  its 
loihope  against  the  archiepiscopal  see  of  Thessalonica,  which  was  reminded 
tttt  if  be  had  shared  with  it  some  of  his  cares  and  duties,  he  had  by  no 
BWHtt  resigned  any  of  hb  plenary  powers,  (a)    The  disturbed  state  of  the 
Afiricaa  Church  on  account  of  the  Arian  Vandals,  supplied  him  with  an  occa- 
M  ftnr  drawing  Africa  within  the  jurisdiction  of  the  Roman  patriarch, 
^■der  the  plea  of  the  necessity  of  the  case.    Some  complaints  against  the 


e)  CbfuCmUL  p^  SSa  8M. 

'» I^  CoDdlll  Rom.  ad  Grattan.  a.  878.  {Oonttant  p.  629.)     s)  Theodortt.  H.  eco.  II,  16m. 

/)inlrM.S^•L•dPimflMdl.    .^nuMan.  Jfare.  XXVII,  8.  9. 

i)X«al  iMliriai  TbMMloB.  (Oppi  Tb.  L  pw  684) 


144     ANCIENT  CHURCH  HISTORY.  P£B.  IL  IMPERIAL  CHURCH.  A.  D.  8t8-«0a 

severity  of  Hilarios,  the  Metropolitan  of  Arelate  (Aries),  supplied  him  with 
a  pretext  for  interfering  with  the  affairs  of  Gaul.  Uilarius,  who  was  really 
no  severer  toward  others  than  toward  himself,  was  ohliged  to  atone  for  the 
indifference  with  which  he  heard  of  the  sensitiveness  with  which  Rome  had 
heard  of  these  complaints,  and  for  his  refusal  to  acknowledge  any  trihunal 
for  him  heyond  the  Alps.  Valentinian  III,  enacted  a  law  which  declared 
the  apostolic  see  the  supreme  legislative  and  judicial  authority  for  the  whole 
Church.  Qi)  Leo  had  dictated  this  law,  and  had  satisfied  the  emperor  that  it 
would  be  wise  to  unite  the  already  crumbling  provinces  with  the  capital  by 
an  ecclesiastical  bond.  It  was  originally  intended  only  for  the  West,  but 
even  there  it  was  ineffectual  against  Ililarius,  (c)  and  in  consequence  of  the 
decay  of  the  empire  beyond  the  Alps,  it  became  an  empty  legal  title,  to  take 
effect  only  in  subsequent  times.  It  was  even  then  uncommon  for  a  Roman 
bishop  to  preach,  but  Leo  declared  that  this  was  to  be  one  of  his  ordinary 
duties.  As  a  proof  that  this  was  not  neglected,  he  left  ninety-six  sermons 
for  various  festivals,  distinguished  for  their  ecclesiastical  spirit,  their  rhythmi- 
cal harmony,  and  their  grandiloquence,  but  without  very  strict  logical  con- 
nection. K  the  work  on  the  Call  of  all  nations  was  written  by  him  in  his 
early  years,  {(T)  ho  proposed  in  it  an  accommodation  of  the  controversial 
questions  then  agitated  in  the  West.  His  epistle  to  Flavianus  presents  a 
decision  upon  the  theological  disputes  of  the  East.  The  tyranny  of  Dioscu- 
rus,  and  the  atrocities  of  the  Robber-Synod,  were  a  scandal  to  the  whole 
Cburch.  Leo  spared  neither  tears  nor  bold  reproofs  to  prevent  the  evil  con- 
sequences which  might  follow  that  synod.  The  death  of  Theodosius  II. 
occurred  in  good  time  for  his  wishes,  as  no  authority  was  superior  to  his  with 
the  imperial  pair  who  then  ascended  the  throne  of  the  East.  His  legates  pre- 
sided at  Chalcedon,  and  every  acquittal  or  condemnation  which  took  place 
there  was  in  Leo^s  name.  When  Attila  had  crossed  the  Alps,  and  Rome  lay 
helpless  before  the  scourge  of  God  (452),  Leo,  in  his  pontifical  robes,  went  to 
meet  him,  and  the  pagan  conqueror  of  the  world  turned  his  hosts  another  way. 
Attila  may  have  seen  good  reasons  for  listening  to  the  prayers  and  warnings 
of  the  priest,  but  so  miraculous  seemed  this  deliverance  of  Italy,  that  in  the 
popular  account  of  it,  Peter  himself  stood  by  the  side  of  his  successor  with 
a  brandished  sword,  {e) 

§  180.     The  Papacy  after  Leo,     Gregory  the  Great^  590-604. 

Liher  diumus  Rom.  Pontijtcum^  (Legal  Usages  of  the  Rom.  8e^  collected  about  716.)  e<L  ITol' 
8ten,  Rom.  1658.  Gamer.  Par.  1680.  4.  (Iloffmanni,  nova  Scrr.  ac  Monum.  Collectio.  LjWw  1788L  L 
Th.  II.)  Ana9ta%ii  Bibliothecaril  (about  870),  liber  pontifiealls  8.  vitae  Rom.  Pontif.  a  Petro  Api 
usque  ad  Nicol.  I.  (with  the  orig.  docc.  only  from  the  time  of  Constantine,  708.)  ed.  Manchiidt 
Rom.  1718-35.  4  Th.  t  {Muratori,  Rcr.  Ital.  Scrr.  Th.  III.  P.  I.) 

I.  Greg.  M.  Expositio  in  Jobnni  a.  Moralinm  L  XXXV.  Liber  pastoralia  cnrae.  (Ingolat  1690k) 
Dialogorum  de  vita  ct  miracc  Patrum  ItaL  et  de  aetemit  animar.  1.  IV.  Epp.  L  XIV.  0pp.  ed  Btn^ 


li)  Leon.  0pp.  Th.  I.  p.  642.  and  Theodosii  Nov.  tit  24. 

c)  Perthel,  Leo's  Strelt  mit  d.  B.  v.  Arlesk  (Illgen's  Zeltachr.  1848.  P.  2.) 

d)  De  vocatione  omnium  gentium.    Quesnel  has,  however,  merely  shown  that  it  was  poasible  for 
Leo  to  be  the  author  of  this  treatise.    Gomp.  Perthel  (as  above),  p.  1S788. 

«)  ffeynsy  de  Leone  Attilae  et  Oenserico  sappUce  Ikota  (0pp.  aoad.  Ooett  1T68L  Th.  UL  p^  tB4m.) 


CHAP.  IIL    CONSTITUTION.    S  130.  GREGORY  TUE  GREAT.  1  45 

didL  Par.  1T<V&  4  Th.  C  GaUiceioli,  Ven.  ITGSas.  17  Th.  4.  Paulm  WurMfridl  (about  775),  de 
▼itaS.  OrecoriL  JoannU  Eee.  Horn.  Diaconi  (about  875),  de  vita  S.  Greg.  1.  IV.  Both  in  the  4tb 
ToL  of  I  be  Benedictine  od. 

IL  Maimbourg^  Illst  dn  Pontlflcat  de  S.  Greg.  Par.  16S6.  4.    G.  K  \n0ger8,  de  G.  M.  ejnsq. 
ptarids  aothropoL  Boat  1S39.  P.  I.    E.  W.  Marggn^f,  de  G.  M.  tIU  Ber.  1S45. 

The  Roman  bishops,  who  after  the  sixth  century  were  called  Popes, 
as  the  Alexandrian  bishops  especially  had  before  been  designated,  acknow- 
ledged that  they,  above  all  others,  were  bonnd  to  execute  the  edicts  which 
the  Chnrch  sent  forth  from  her  councils,  (a)  but  the  historical  basis  on  which 
their  power  was  claimed  was  derived  from  the  divine  right  of  St.  Peter. 
Sometimes  a  vogue  and  inconsiderate  reference  was  made  with  the  same 
object  even  to  Paul  as  the  supreme  head  of  the  Gentile  Church,  (ft)    As  the 
imperial  government  was  frequently  powerless  in  Rome,  the  popes,  by  their 
patrimonial  rights  as  great  proprietors,  and  by  their  episcopal  court*?,  were 
able  sometimes  to  supply  its  place.    More  than  once  they  delivered  Rome 
and  the  surrounding  country  from  the  hands  of  the  barbarians.     When, 
therefore,  the  last  shadow  of  the  Western  Empire  had  disappeared  (476),  and 
Arian  monarchs  had  set  up  a  German  kingdom  in  Italy,  the  popes  were 
regarded  by  the  Roman  people  as  their  native  lords,  and  with  the  exception 
of  some  instances  in  which  they  were  abused  by  their  conquerors,  they  were 
the  actual  masters  of  the  country.    The  Roman  clergy  of  that  day  were  pow- 
erful enough  to  proclaim,  that  every  interference  of  a  layman  in  the  affairs 
of  the  Chnrch,  was  by  its  own  nature  invalid,  and  that  the  successors  of  St. 
Peter  could  be  judged  by  none  but  God.  (c)    But  when  Justinian  I.  recon- 
qoered  Italy,  they  again  became  dependent  upon  Constantinople,  and  even 
their  ancient  reputation  for  orthodoxy  was  thus  endangered.    This  continued 
until  the  time  of  Gregory  /.,  who  saw  that  the  only  condition  on  which 
ecelenastical  power  could  be  eigoyed,  was  that  they  should  throw  off  this 
political  dependence.    In  the  midst  of  the  embarrassments  produced  by  the 
settlement  of  the  Longobards  in  Italy  (after  568),  he  contrived  so  to  use  that 
event  that  it  prepared  the  way  for  their  independence.    He  was,  however, 
compeDed  himself  to  publish  a  law  of  the  emperor  which  he  regarded  as 
iDOonnstent  with  the  law  of  God,  {d)  and  to  congratulate  a  regicide  on  his 
teoenon  to  the  throne,  {e)    He  was  originally  of  a  patrician  family,  and  on 
the  road  to  the  highest  civil  offices,  when  he  suddenly  renounced  the  world, 
and  tamed  the  palace  of  his  ancestors  into  a  convent.    From  this  he  was 
called  to  the  government  of  the  Church,  but  in  the  midst  of  pontifical  splen- 
dor bis  monastic  severity  became  intense.    Toward  his  dependants  he  was 
more  and  more  imperious  in  his  demands  of  duty  to  the  Church,  but  lavish 
in  hifl  expenditures  upon  the  poor  and  the  idle.    By  means  of  his  school  for 
nn»c,  he  effected  considerable  improvements  in  psalmody,  (/)  and  to  the 
Public  worship  of  Rome  he  imparted  that  mysterious  pomp  for  which  it  has 


«)  fi4a%n  Ep.  18.  (JTanti  Th.  VIII.  p.  51.)     h)  Gregor.  Jf.  In  I.  Reg.  B.  (Th.  III.  P.  II.  p.  250.) 

OCoM:  fiom.  IIL  Bub  87ramacho  a.  502.  {.Vansi  Th.  YIIL  p.  2608.)  Ennodii,  L.  apolog.  pro 
^  IT.  Bom.  n  palmari  {ManH  Th.  YIII.  p.  234s8.) 

'iL  IIL  Efk  6&  ad  Maaric.     e)  L.  XIII.  £p.  81.  ad  Phocam. 

fS  Gerbfrt,  de  caotn  et  masica  sacra.  Bamb.  et  Frlb.  1774.  Th.  L  p.  24706.  />.  Atdony^  arcbaeoL 
'^  1  Gregurtan  KOenDg&  ll&iut  1829.  i, 

10 


146     ANCIENT  CHUECn  HISTORY.  PER.  II.  IMPERIAL  CHURCH.  A.  D.  819-800. 

since  been  distinguished.  To  the  sacrament  of  the  Lord's  Snpper  especially, 
he  gave  the  essential  character  of  a  sacrifice  of  the  Mass^  (rf)  and  thoroughly  im- 
bued the  popular  mind  with  the  notion  of  a  Pvrgatory,  If  he  did  not  authorize 
the  burning  of  the  Palatine  library,  ho  certainly  had  a  great  contempt  for 
worldly  science  and  literature,  and  thought  it  a  shame  for  the  word  of  God 
to  be  restrained  by  the  rules  of  Donatus.  (h)  In  his  practical  works  he  has 
done  quite  as  much  to  promote  in  the  whole  Western  Church  a  blind  eccle- 
siastical credulity  as  an  intense  zeal  in  behalf  of  the  Church.  He  was  full  of 
passionate  ardor  to  promote  the  kingdom  of  Christ,  but  that  kingdom  was 
identical  with  that  of  the  Pope.  His  successors  sometimes  acknowledged 
their  allegiance  to  the  emperor,  but  it  was  only  when  they  were  compelled 
to  do  so.  When  contending  for  the  faith,  and  about  images,  they  never 
hesitated  to  exclude  even  the  monarch  and  the  patriarchs  of  his  court  from 
the  communion  of  the  Church. 

§  181.     General  CouneiU  and  the  Catholic  Church. 

The  Synods  of  the  Patriarchal  and  Metropolitan  dioceses  continued  to  be 
the  regular  authorities  for  legislation  and  superior  jurisdiction.  The  efforts 
of  the  Church  to  attain  general  unity  rendered  it  indispensable,  that  as  far 
as  political  circumstances  would  allow,  deputies  of  the  whole  Church  should 
be  asscTnbled  for  deciding  theological  controversies.  These  general  assem- 
blies of  the  Church  were  in  fact  composed  only  of  bishops  residing  within  the 
Roman  empire,  and  their  organization  was  much  influenced  by  the  caprice 
of  the  emperor  and  the  patriarchs ;  but  as  the  main  body  of  the  Catholic 
Church  was  found  within  the  empire,  and  bishops  from  countries  called  bar- 
barian were  admitted  to  scats,  these  assemblies  were  looked  upon  as  the 
projier  representatives  of  the  Catholic  Church,  (a)  Near  the  close  of  the 
fourth  century  they  therefore  received  the  name  of  (Ecumenical  Synods, 
although  it  was  sometimes  difiScult  to  distinguish  them  from  other  orthodox 
synods.  Seven  of  these  synods,  in  fact,  gradually  attained  the  authority  of 
oecumenical  assemblies,  and  to  these  in  the  West  was  added  the  Synod  of 
Sardica,  and  in  the  Greek  Church  the  Second  TruUan  Synod.  The  primary 
object  for  which  they  were  assembled  was  to  determine  theological  questions, 
but  they  also  formed  canons  upon  various  legal  subjects,  and  when  occasion 
called  for  it,  they  were  the  highest  judicatories  of  the  Church.  Legal  ques- 
tions were  decided  by  a  majority  of  votes,  but  in  matters  of  faith,  unanimity 
was  secured  by  an  exclusion  of  the  dissenting  minority.  The  ultimate  de- 
cisions were  disregarded  by  those  whose  consciences  were  violated  by  them. 
No  one  could  pretend  that  all  of  them  were  true,  as  in  the  fourth  century 
synods  were  arrayed  against  each  other.  A  celebrated  bishop  entirely  de- 
spaired of  them,  (li)  and  even  less  passionate  teachers  acknowledged,  that 
when  the  spirit  of  the  Church  should  become  more  perfectly  developed,  a 

g)  Oreg.  L.  Micramentornm  de  drcalo  annl  si  Bacramentftriam.     Ordo  et  canon  misaae  Grego- 
rianua  in  tlie  Codex  litorg.  Ecc  Rom.  cur.  IT.  A.  DaniA,  Lps.  IMl.-^LUientkal,  de  eaoone 
Qregorlnno.  Lugd.  1740. 

A)  Kp.  ad.  Loandr.  prefixed  to  the  Exposltio  In  Jobom. 

a)  Ev$fh.  Yita  Const  III,  7.     I)  Greg.  Kom.  Ep.  &K.  ad.  Proeop.  (Tb.  L  p.  814.) 


CBAP.  IIL  CONSTITUTION.  1 181.  CECUM.  SYNODS.  CHAP.  IV.  ECCLES.  LIFE.     147 

better  expreasion  of  it  might  be  expected  from  the  Synods,  (c)  But  even 
at  Chaloedon  the  decisions  of  the  Nicaean  Fathers  were  looked  upon  as  an 
immutable  law,  expressed  by  the  divine  Spirit  himself,  (d)  Past  ages  were 
not  sopposed  to  possess  any  authority  greater  than  the  present.  Hence,  from 
aboat  the  time  of  the  fifth  oecumenical  council,  it  was  generally  supposed 
that  every  such  oecumenical  council,  in  matters  of  faith,  declared  the  truth 
in  an  in&llible  form  in  consequence  of  the  Iloly  Spirit  especially  bestowed 
upon  the  bishops.  In  these  general  assemblies  the  Catholic  Church  felt  itself 
to  be  what  it  was  so  anxious  to  be,  viz. :  The  divine  kingdom  of  Christ  on 
earth,  the  only  source  of  truth  and  salvation,  pervading,  indeed,  the  whole 
earth,  but  constituting  a  single  external  community,  independent  of  all  civil 
power,  and  directed  according  to  ecclesiastical  laws  by  the  Holy  Ghost 
through  the  bishops. 


CHAP.  IV.— ECCLESIASTICAL  LIFE. 

§  182.     Religions  Spirit  of  the  People  and  Ecclesiastical  Discipline, 

An  earnest  struggle  was  for  some  time  kept  up  between  primitive  abste- 
nuoasnefls  and  hostility  to  the  world  on  the  one  hand,  and  the  worldly-mind- 
edneas  which  had  now  entered  the  Church  and  those  means  by  which  it 
loogfat  gratification  on  the  other.   Plays,  dances,  oaths,  and  loans  upon  usury, 
were  declared  to  be  sinful.    But  as  a  complete  renunciation  of  the  world  was 
found  to  be  impossible  in  the  new  circumstances  of  the  Church,  a  higher  sys- 
tem of  morality  was  devised  for  those  who  would  be  perfect,  and  were  will- 
ing to  imictise  unnatural  self-denials,  and  another  of  a  lower  nature,  in  which 
many  indulgences  were  allowed,  was  formed  for  ordinary  Christians.    The 
former  system  ran  great  risks  in  consequence  of  the  pride  and  hypocrisy 
which  were  soon  found  to  be  incidental  to  it.    From  a  nobler  spirit  of  dis- 
■mnlation,  some  persons  of  an  eccentric  character  quietly  submitted,  or  some- 
times gave  occasion  to  evil  reports,  {n)    The  practical  wisdom  tolerated  by 
the  lower  system  was  debased  by  the  consciousness  of  its  own  imperfection. 
Etch  marriage  was  looked  upon  as  belonging  to  this  lower  condition.    There 
was  some  doubt  whether  it  should  be  regarded  as  a  necessary  evil  in  general, 
or  M  an  inviolable  sacrament^  but  second  marriages  were  condemned,  and  in 
the  West,  after  the  fifth  century,  the  marriage  of  a  divorced  person  was  pun- 
idked  as  adultery.  (&)     External  forms,   such  as  fasting,   almsgiving,  and 
^yera,  without  reference  to  the  internal  spirit  which  produced  them,  were 
n^vded  as  meritorious  and  expiatory.    The  object  of  education  was  the 
•ttainment  of  the  most  humble  submission  to  authority,  and  the  ideal  of  all 
cxoeQenee  was  the  mortifications  and  conflicts  of  the  saints.    The  means  of 
pioe  were  often  used  as  mere  charms,  and  heathenish  superstitions  of  every 

<1ittaiuM.de  fjnod.  Arim.  et  8«leuc.  c  48.  (Th.  I.  p.  917.)  Auguttin^  Aehh^i.  c  Donati.st. 
n.i  (Grotfdift;  c^  a  D.  X.)  c  Maximin.  Arian.  11,  14,  8. 

'0  (Vnc.  Chaleed,  actio  1.  (ManH  Tb.  VI.  p.  672.)  Kespectlng  NIcaea,  ConstanUne  in  So- 
^L9.   /tidor.  iWM  L.  IV.  Ep.  99. 

')ingr.  H.  m&  lY, 88.     2t)  Jnnoe«nt  /.  Ep.  6,  c  6.    Comp.  Oono.  MOeviL  a.  416.  a  17. 


148     ANCIENT  CHURCH  HISTORY.  PER.  II.  IMPERIAL  CHURCH.  A.  D.  81S-«00. 

kind  remained  in  full  force.  We  already  find  traces  of  the  belief  that  men 
could  form  a  compact  with  the  devil,  from  which  no  penitence  could  obtain 
deliverance  but  through  the  goodness  of  the  holy  Virgin,  (c)  But  even  in  this 
time  of  general  helplessness  the  world  was  fbll  of  miracles.  Christianity 
was  frequently  a  mere  subject  of  controversy  and  of  entertainments,  and  yet 
people  took  part  in  ecclesiastical  affairs  with  an  earnestness  and  activity 
which  amounted  to  absurdity.  (</)  Brotherly  love  was  no  longer  the  peculiar 
badge  of  the  Christian  community,  and  an  observing  pagan  remarks,  that 
even  wild  beasts  were  not  more  furious  against  each  other  than  were  the 
Christians  of  his  day.  (e)  The  Church  had  no  remedy  for  this  general  cor- 
ruption of  social  life,  and  for  the  luxury  and  extreme  refinement  which  were 
side  by  side  with  popular  misery  and  universal  servility.  Indeed,  it  was 
itself  rapidly  becoming  swallowed  up  in  the  general  abyss  of  the  Roman 
empire.  Many  were  raised  by  it  above  the  feeling  of  this  relaxation  of  all 
public  relations,  and  made  to  participate  in  the  liberty  of  the  kingdom  of  the 
Spirit.  The  severity  of  the  ancient  discipline  was  gradually  made  to  yield 
to  new  circumstances  by  numerous  dispensations,  but  a  multitude  of  minor 
penances  were  introduced  and  regulated  by  a  well-arranged  penal  code.  In 
the  East  the  confession  of  secret  sins  was  left  to  the  option  of  each  individ- 
ual, and  public  opinion  became  inflexibly  opposed  to  auricular  confession,  on 
account  of  certain  flagrant  crimes  known  to  have  been  connected  with 
it.  (/)  In  the  TVest,  confession  was  more  and  more  regarded  as  indispensa- 
ble to  forgiveness,  but  after  Leo's  time  this  might  be  made  in  the  ear  of  a 
priest  bound  to  secresy.  (jg) 

m 

§  133.     Celibacy  and  Moral  Condition  of  the  Clergy, 

Theiner^  toI.  1.  ($  9.  note  h.)    Carotf^  Bctracht  d.  Coel.  part  1.    Samml.  d.  Coelibatsgvcetze. 
part  2.  Frkf.  18S2.  f.    [/.  Taylor^  Ancient  ChrisUanlty.  Philad.  1840.  8.] 

A  larger  number  of  synodal  enactments  were  published  against  the  mar« 
riage  of  priests  after  their  ordination,  but  in  the  East,  when  oven  bishops  had 
been  married  before  ordination,  they  were  generally  unmolested.  When  a 
new  law  on  this  subject  was  proposed  at  Nicaea,  Faphnutixis^  an  aged  con- 
fessor and  a  rigid  ascetic  who  had  never  touched  a  woman,  so  powerfully  de- 
fended the  chastity  and  sanctity  of  the  marriage  state,  that  the  liberty  which 
had  always  been  customary  in  this  matter  was  confirmed,  {a)  and  the  Orien- 
tal Church  even  anathematized  those  who  rejected  a  married  priest.  Qi)  The 
right  of  a  clergyman  to  live  with  a  wife  whom  he  had  married  before  hiB 
ordination,  and  who  had  been  a  free  and  spotless  virgin  before  her  marriage, 
was  also  recognized  and  confirmed  by  the  Trullan  Synod,  but  the  bishops 
were  required  to  separate  themselves  from  their  wives,  (c)    In  the  West, 

e)  AemU,  Sommer^  de  Tbeophlli  cum  diab.  foedere.  Ber.  1S44. 

d)  Grtg.  Ny&9,  Or.  de  Dcitate  Filii.  (Th.  I.  p.  46Ca.)      e)  Ammian,  MarceU.  XXII,  5. 
/)  Socrat  n.  ecc  V,  19. 

g)  Leon.  £p.  168.  c  2.  (0pp.  p.  14808.)— Z>a2Za«u«,  de  sacramcntall  «.  aoricnlarl  Latinor.  eoofea- 
Bione.  Gen.  1061.  4.    BolUau,  Hist  conC  auria  Par.  16S1    Xlee^  d.  Beichte.  Frk(  182a 

a)  Sooral  H.  eoo.  1, 11.    Sotom.  H.  ecc  I,  23. 

b)  Socrat  II,  48.    Syru  Gangr.  a.  862^70.  c.  4.  (J/anH  Th.  II.  p.  109&)  oompw  Can,  opotL  & 

c)  ayn,  T^rvU,  eta,  8.  ft.  ia-12. 


CHAP.  IT.    ECCLE8.  LIFE.    1 18&  OELIBACT.    S  lU.  ORIENTAL  MON  AS.  LIFE.     1 49 

ftft^r  the  time  of  Siricios,  Bishop  of  Rome  (385),  tlie  provincial  synods  de- 
dared  that  none  but  subdeacons  should  be  allowed  to  have  wives,  {d)  and 
gradaallj  the  celibacy  of  the  clergy  was  universally  demanded.  Human 
lawH,  however,  were  comparatively  ineffectual  when  opposed  to  the  very 
nature  of  man.  Although  persons  of  an  elevated  spirit  among  the  clergy 
maintained  the  same  contempt  of  the  world  which  had  formerly  prevailed, 
and  were  rewarded  and  prompted  to  do  so  by  the  honor  of  their  order,  many 
low-minded  men  were  attracted  by  the  wealth  and  honors  of  the  Church, 
and  lived  in  hypocrisy,  or  in  open  devotion  to  worldly  pleasure.  These 
looked  upon  the  performance  of  outward  worship  as  the  sole  business  of  the 
priesthood,  and  changed  their  creed  according  to  the  imperial  mandate.  iSiri^- 
Hanvs  wrote  a  satire  against  the  covetousness  of  such  priests,  in  which  he 
exhorted  every  one  to  purchase  salvation  in  this  easy  way  by  a  proper  payment 
for  his  sins,  (e)  But  dark  as  was  the  picture  of  this  corruption,  painted  by  the 
ecdesiasdcal  teachers  themselves,  the  very  indignation  which  these  express 
against  it,  the  ideal  of  the  true  priesthood  which  they  held  up,  and  the 
icknowledgment  which  these  received  among  their  contemporaries,  prove 
that  even  exalted  virtues  were  esteemed  and  found  among  the  clergy.  (/) 
When  the  barbarians  overran  the  country,  the  priests  were  not  only  ready 
to  administer  consolation  and  deliverance  to  their  people  in  the  performance 
of  their  official  dnties,  but  to  surrender  their  lives  for  their  religion,  (g) 

§  184.    ManaBtie  Life  in  the  EoMt.     Cont.  from  §  65. 

PaOadU  <d.  about  420%  Hist  LAasUea.  Theodoreti,  ^tX^cof  loropia  ^  cunrnrifd)  ToXirtla, 
Sierat  lY,  tSmk  Stmom.  I,  lS-14.  lU,  U.  YI,  28-^  Lives  of  the  monutie  aaints,  and  manjr  let- 
kit  Vj  HitfTooymna.  Cawiamts.  ($  12.)  [S.  P.  Day^  Monastic  Institutions,  tbeir  Origin,  Progress. 
4e:Sed.LoDd.lSMu  112.] 

From  the  ethical  system  which  required  a  renunciation  of  the  world,  was 
prodnced  monasticism.    The  necessity  of  having  some  society  induced  the 
beimits  to  assemble  in  cloisters  {koivo^wv^  tiavhpay  claustrum),  and  the  bishops 
irve  favorable  to  an  institution  by  means  of  which  order  and  supervision 
beetme  practicable.     Paehomius^  a  disciple  of  Anthony,  first  established 
mooasteries  for  each  sex  on  the  island  of  Tabenna  in  the  Nile  (about  840), 
tad  the  same  thing  was  subsequently  done  by  Amun  in  the  desert  of  Nitra, 
Vy  EUarion  in  the  desert  of  Gaza,  and  by  Basil  the  Great  near  New  Caesa- 
wt.   Every  convent  was  governed  by.  rules  imposed  upon  it  by  its  founder, 
Vrt  most  of  these  required  unconditional  submission  to  the  will  of  the  supe- 
rior {jffoviiMvotj  dpxifiav^pi'njst  a/3)3a(),  a  complete  surrender  of  all  private 
^  ind  possesions,  a  mortification  of  the  sensual  nature,  and  a  life  entirely 
^oted  to  (3od  and  to  divine  things.    Their  time  was  wholly  taken  up  with 
I*»»  exercises  and  easy  manual  employments.    Tlie  tortures  which  they 
ufficted  on  themselves  when  battling  with  the  temptations  of  an  excited 

')  ArM<,  Ep.  ad  nimerlnm  c.  7-9.  {Conatant  p.  6805S.) 

<)  A4t.  araritiain  L  I V.  (about  4fiO.)  0pp.  ed.  BaluM.  Yen.  172a 

/)  GrtQor.  JfoM,  cIs  loirr^r  iral  Tfpl  iwtffKSirwv.     Conip.  UUmann^  Grep.  v.  Naz.  p.  521ss. 

t^SooroL  YI,  6L    Somotn,  YIII,  4    Thsodoret  Y,  88.     Victor  VU.  et  Vig.  TupM.  Opp.  ina.  4. 

^i  ir^pA.xin,6w 


150    ANCIENT  CHURCH  HISTORY.   PER.  IL  IMPERIAL  CHURCH.  A.  D.  818-mOL 

fancjf  frequently  exceeded  the  requirements  of  their  rule,  and  sometimes 
terminated  in  suicide  or  insanity.    From  the  suppression  of  the  natural,  pro- 
ceeded unnatural  passions.    A  return  to  the  world  was  not  impossible,  but  it 
was  threatened  with  ecclesiastical  penances.    After  the  time  of  Basil,  the 
opinion  generally  prevailed,  that  the  marriage  of  a  virgin  espoused  to  God 
was  not  only  adulterous,  but  void.    Some  eminent  teachers  were  opposed  to 
this  view,  (a)  and  there  were  even  some  married  monks.  (6)    None  but  the 
abbots  were  usually  ordained  as  priests,  and  in  some  instances  these  took 
rank  by  the  side  of  the  bishops,  their  monasteries  being  looked  upon  as  con- 
gregations of  laymen.    But  after  a  brief  resistance  on  the  part  of  the  rigid 
class,  (r)  the  convents  became  the  ordinary  seminaries  of  tho  clergy.    This 
divine  philosophy  was  so  generally  received,  that  cities  became  solitary  and 
deserts  full  of  people.    The  burden  of  the  declining  state  was  not  felt  within 
the  cloister^s  walls,  noble  minds  were  attracted  by  the  magnanimity  of  a  bold 
renunciation  of  the  world,  and  what  was  then  regarded  as  the  most  exalted 
state  could  not  be  found  in  the  world.    In  the  hands  of  the  more  violent 
bishops,  the  monks  became  an  easily  excited  host,  which  in  tlieir  contests 
with  pagans  and  heretics  often  controlled  the  hearts  and  clubs  of  the  popu- 
lace, and  feared  neither  the  imperial  despotism,  nor  the  laws,  nor  human 
nature  itself. 

§  185.    ITermits,    Simeon  Stylites, 

Sonom.  YI,  2R-34  Hujtni  YItoe  Patrnm  s.  HiBt  eremitic*.  In  the  2d  vol.  of  the  Yitae  Patrnm, 
ed.  RwttDeidiu*^  Antn.  (1615.)  162S.  f.  In  the  ProtestAnt  selection :  Yltae  P.  repurgatae  p.  G.  Jfajo- 
rem  c.  praef.  LuVitri^  Vlt  \fM,—TheodorHi,  Hist  religioe.  c  2«.  Eragr.  H.  ecc  1, 18.  lift  of 
Simeon,  by  his  piipll  AnUmitu  (Acta  Sanctor.  Jan.  voL  I.  p.  26l8iL)  and  his  cootemporary  CVmumm 
{A98emani  Acta  Mart  P.  IL  p.  2688S.) 

'  Not  only  might  tho  nuns  reside  in  the  cloister,  but  they  were  sometimes 
allowed  even  to  remain  in  their  father^s  house,  or  in  the  dwelling  of  a  priest 
(§  64).  The  ordinary  home  of  the  monks  was  in  the  desert.  The  Anachoreta 
either  entered  into  some  fellowship  with  a  neighboring  monastery,  or  re- 
mained solitary  until  some  of  them  became  half  savages.  In  the  lives  of 
those  primitive  fathers  who  were  the  idols  of  popular  tradition,  we  meet 
with  exalted  virtues  and  heroic  self-tortures  carried  to  such  an  extreme,  that 
human  dignity  and  propriety  were  annihilated.  We  sometimes  find  a  wis- 
dom which  seems  almost  supernatural,  and  sometimes  the  pious  simplicity  of 
an  ecclesiastical  mountebank  like  Paul  the  Simple.'*'  Simeon,  a  Syrian,  either 
invented  a  new  kind  of  life,  or  imitated  that  which  prevailed  among  the 
Indian  penitents.  When  a  boy,  he  forsook  his  flock,  and  more  than  onoe 
was  saved  from  a  fanatical  suicide  in  the  convent.  For  thirty  years,  on  a 
pillar  near  Antioch  (after  420),  as  a  mediator  between  heaven  and  earth,  he 
preached  repentance  to  the  astonished  multitudes  that  gathered  around  him. 
He  became  an  umpire  and  an  apostle  to  the  wild  Arab  tnbes,  and  gave  coun- 
sel, and  even  dictated  laws  to  an  emperor.    lie  had  imitators  as  late  as  the 


a)  KpipK  haer.  61,  7.    AugwL  de  bono  vldalt  c.  10.    Comp.  Cypr,  Ep.  02. 
h)  Angutt  de  haer.  c.  4a      e)  Oaaaiaru  de  instlt  coenobb.  XI,  17. 
*  General  view  of  the  acoonnta  in  TUUmont,  Tb.  YIL  p.  lilBa. 


(SAP.  IT.    EOCLES.  LIFE.   1 18fi.  SIMEON  8TYLITES.    S 186.  BENEDICTINES.     151 

twelfth  century,  but  while  many  endured  his  tortures,  few  attained  the  spirit 
or  the  reputation  of  his  life. 

§  186.     Monasticism  in  the  West,    Benedictines, 

BUron,  and  Ca—ian,  (|  184.)  Dacherii  et  MabiUonii  AcU  Sanctor.  Ord.  S.  Bcncd.  (till 
lioa)  ie«»-1701.  9  Th.  £  Jfabillonii  Annates  Ord.  8.  Bened.  (till  1187.  Par.  1708-89.)  Luc 
17MM5.  6  Tb.  t  In  the  PraeC  Saec  I.  p.  T:  Obsa.  de  monackis  in  Occld.  ante  Benedictnm.— 
6«9ch.  d.  Benedictinerord.  A.  SpUtler't  Yorlea  v.  Gnrlltt  Hamb.  l$2a  4.  [Article  in  Edinburgh 
Ser.  for  Jan.  1849,  in  Eclectic  Magazine  for  April,  1849.] 

Monasticism  became  known  in  the  West  through  the  followers  of  Atha- 
naaus.  At  first  it  was  looked  upon  with  astonishment,  ridiculed  or  abhorred, 
but  in  a  short  time  it  was  extensively  propagated  through  the  influence  of 
Martin  of  Tours  and  Cassian  in  Gaul,  of  Ambrose  and  Jerome  in  Italy,  and 
of  Augustine  in  Africa.  Afartintts^  Bishop  of  Turonum  (873-400),  was  the 
sunt  of  his  people,  was  able  to  recognize  Satan  even  in  the  form  of  the 
Saviour,  and  according  to  his  disciples,  possessed  power  to  suspend  or  confirm 
the  laws  of  the  universe.  He  was  carried  to  his  grave  by  two  thousand 
monks,  {a)  At  first,  those  rules  were  adopted  which  had  been  devised  in 
the  East,  but  it  was  soon  found  that  the  privations  of  the  desert  were  not 
snited  to  a  Gallican  stomach  and  winter,  (h)  Benedict  of  Nvrgia^  who  had 
dreamed  away  his  youth  in  the  grotto  of  Subiaco,  and  had  been  looked  upon 
as  a  saint  by  the  mountain  shepherds,  established  in  the  wilderness  of 
Monte  Casftino  (529)  a  society  of  monks,  whose  mild  but  well- arranged  rules 
and  inviolable  vows  soon  united  most  of  the  Western  monasteries  into  a  per- 
fectly organized  community,  and  bound  them  to  a  useful  course  of  life,  (e) 
Already,  in  Martin's  establishment,  the  disciples  had  been  employed  in  the 
labor  of  copying  books.  («i)  So  when  Cassiodorus  escaped  from  the  storms 
of  his  political  life,  and  found  refuge  (588)  in  his  convent  of  Vivarium,  he 
Erected  the  attention  of  the  monks  to  literary  pusuits.  {e)  The  Benedictines 
preserved  the  monuments  of  antiquity  for  a  more  cultivated  age,  made  the 
deserts  fertile,  and  became  the  instructors  of  the  people.  The  convents  were 
placed  under  the  supervision  of  the  bishops  within  whose  diocese  they  were, 
bat  these  had  no  power  to  violate  the  constitution  of  the  order.  A  few 
monasteries  attempted  to  escape  the  jurisdiction  or  the  oppression  of  their 
Irifihop,  by  putting  themselves  under  the  care  of  some  distinguished  bishop 
at  a  distance. 

§  187.     Veneration  for  Saints. 

In  an  age  when  people  quietly  enjoyed  all  that  they  possessed,  those  cen- 
turies in  which  painful  struggles  had  been  endured  were  looked  upon  as 
beroic,  and  those  heroes  who  had  purchased  victory  with  their  blood  were 
i&Tested  with  a  growing  splendor  in  the  grateful  recollections  of  subsequent 
gmeratioDs.  The  pious  respect  which  all  felt  for  their  earthly  remains,  in 
tbe  course  of  time,  and  through  the  influence  of  Egyptian  customs  and  hea- 

a)  SulpicH  Set.  de  vita  B.  Martini  L.  et  Epp.    Greg.  Tur,  de  miracc  S.  Mart 
I)  Sulpicii  8w.  Dial  I,  8.    CaatUxn.  de  Instit  coen.  1, 11. 
e)  Legends :  Grtgorii  M.  Dialog.  1.  IL    Rale :  BoUten.  Th.  L  p.  lllaa. 
4)  S^  Vita  Mart  e.  la     «)  loatttt  ad  div.  lect  (S 119.  note  g.) 


152     ANCIENT  CHURCH  HISTORY.  PBR.  XL  IMPERIAL  CHURCH.  A.  D.  S19-aoa 

thenish  saperstitioiui,  became  exaggerated  into  a  veneration  for  their  bones, 
many  of  which  were  discovered  by  special  miracles  and  revelations.  So 
lucrative  finally  became  the  traflSc  in  these  relics,  that  various  laws  were 
formed  against  it.  People  took  delight  in  other  and  strange  relics  which  had 
been  in  any  way  connected  with  the  daily  lives  of  former  saints.  Public 
prayers  for  the  martyrs  were  gradually  changed  into  prayers  to  them  as  inter- 
cessors with  Grod.  The  same  feeling  which  had  induced  their  heathen  ances- 
tors to  deify  men,  now  led  them  to  regard  the  saints  as  subordinate  deities. 
Some  were  honored  only  in  those  localities  in  which  they  had  lived,  or  in 
which  their  relics  were  preserved,  but  others  in  much  krger  circles.  Whole 
orders  and  nations  attached  themselves  to  particular  saints,  and  others  were 
made  to  preside  over  certain  kinds  of  assistance.  The  heathen  had  some 
occasion  for  ridiculing  Christians  on  the  ground  that  their  religion  had  be- 
come paganized.  Agnppa's  cheerful  Pantheon,  once  dedicated  to  Jupiter 
and  all  the  gods,  was  now  consecrated  to  the  Mother  of  God  and  all  the  mar- 
tyrs (608).  As  soon  as  the  Nestorian  controversy  had  decided  that  the  Vir- 
gin had  given  birth  to  God,  she  was  placed  at  the  head  of  the  saintly  host. 
Epiphanius,  on  the  one  hand,  points  out  those  as  heretics  (^AvTi^iKOfiaptayirai) 
who  believed  that  Mary  had  been  the  mother  of  several  children  after  the 
birth  of  our  Saviour,  and  on  the  other  colls  a  female  sect  (KoWvpidiapoC) 
which  bestowed  divine  honors  upon  her  by  the  offering  of  a  cake,  the  priest- 
esses of  the  Mother  of  God.  (a)  Though  all  were  not  agreed  upon  the  sub- 
ject, it  was  generally  believed  that  her  virginity  was  unimpaired  even  wheo 
she  brought  forth  offspring.  Prayers  were  also  addressed  to  angels^  espe- 
cially as  it  seemed  unsuitable  that  they  should  be  regarded  as  inferior  to  the 
saints,  {h)  Some  persons  who  had  been  objects  of  devout  admiration  during 
their  lives,  on  account  of  their  exalted  or  at  least  singular  piety,  were  placed 
by  their  contemporaries  on  an  equality  with  the  martyrs.  In  acknowledging 
these  as  saints,  the  bishops  only  expressed  the  popular  will.  Such  a  venera- 
tion, often  amounting  even  to  adoration,  did  indeed  put  imperiect  mediators, 
with  their  generally  overwrought  virtues,  in  the  place  of  Christ,  but  it  pre- 
served in  its  freshness  a  poetic  recollection  of  the  illustrious  examples  of  bet- 
ter times.  From  the  very  nature  of  these  recollections,  they  could  never 
attain  their  complete  significance  until  they  had  been  reproduced  in  popular 
legends  and  stories.  Thus  St.  Agnes  with  her  lamb  became  the  type  of  pious 
virginity,  (c)  just  as  Christopher  had  become  the  type  of  a  dauntless  man- 
hood, when  he  made  diligent  search  among  all  the  great  men  of  the  earth, 
that  he  might  serve  only  the  greatest,  and  finally  found  what  he  desired  in 
the  child  Jesus.  (</)  Even  the  soil  which  our  Lord  once  trod  became  an 
object  of  devotion  on  account  of  recollections  of  him.  Beneath  a  temple  of 
Venus  was  discovered  the  grave  of  the  risen  Saviour,  and  over  the  spot  Oon- 
stantine  erected  the  Church  of  the  Resurrection,  (e)    J1\b  mother  Helena 


a)  EpipK.  haer.  78  et  79.— IHlnitfr,  de  CoIIjrld.  fluiftticls  saec  lY.  (MlsoelL  Hafh.  181&  Th.  L 
FaBC.2.) 

h)  Ambros.  de  vlduls  9,  65.  comp.  JuMln.  ApoL  I.  c.  6. 

c)  TiUemonL  Th.  Y.  p.  8448a     </)  Review  of  the  Legends :  Annalen  d.  TbeoU  1684  Not. 

e)  EmA,  Ylta  Conit  III,  85-40. 


CHAP.IY.  SOCLS&LIFE.  $187.  SAINTS.  $  ISa  PUB.  WORSHIP.  FESTIYALA.    153 

hftd  herself  baptized  in  the  Jordan  (826),  and  it  was  near  the  close  of  this 
oentnry  that  the  legends  first  delighted  the  hearts  of  men  by  revealing  the 
tacred  cross,  which  has  nnce  been  preserved  unimpaired  in  spite  of  the 
removal  from  it  of  innumerable  pieces.  (/)  Annually,  at  Easter,  pilgrims 
aaembled  oat  of  all  countries  around  the  sacred  sepulchre. 

S  188.    Fuhlie  Warahip. 

The  outward  forms  of  religion  became  gradually  more  and  more  imposing. 
Tnm  the  ancient  temples  the  incense  and  many  ancient  customs  of  heathenism 
were  transferred  to  the  churches,  (a)  By  the  use  of  tapers  and  perpetual  lamps, 
the  solemnity  of  nocturnal  festivals  was  combined  with  the  light  of  day.    In 
some  places  a  piece  of  metal  was  struck  by  a  hammer  to  call  the  people 
together,  but  in  the  seventh  century  bells  were  used  for  that  purpose.    Soon 
after,  in  face  of  continual  opposition  to  all  instrumental  music,  the  organ 
{opya9oy)j  worthy  of  being  the  invention  of  a  saint  who  had  listened  to  the 
minstrelsj  of  angels,  was  brought  to  Italy  from  Greece,  (h)     Church  music  in 
flttemate  parts  had  been  extended  in  every  direction  from  Antioch,  and  had 
been  much  improved,  especially  in  the  West,  after  the  time  of  Ambrosius.  (c) 
In  the  Greek  Church  the  principal  part  of  public  service  consisted  in  the 
lermon,  though  it  was  often  only  a  rhetorical  amusement  rewarded  by  clap- 
ping  of  hands.    From  looking  upon  the  Lord's  Supper  as  a  encharist,  men 
gradoallj  passed  to  regard  it  as  an  expiatory  sacrifice,  and  we  find  in  some 
ucertain  figures  of  speech,  intimations  of  a  change  of  the  bread  and  wine 
into  the  body  and  blood  of  Christ.    Love-feasts  long  survived  the  renuncia- 
tion of  the  ecclesiastical  family  life  which  had  first  given  occasion  for  them, 
and  now  took  the  form  of  repasts  for  the  poor,  prepared  by  the  whole 
Church,  but  with  only  a  few  local  exceptions  they  were  regarded,  even  in  the 
eommencement  of  the  fifth  century,  as  an  antiquated  custom.    As  baptism 
was  generaUy  administered  to  infants,  and  in  a  public  assembly,  and  as  Chris- 
tianity had  now  become  universal,  every  thing  like  Christian  mysteries  had 
been  gradually  laid  aside,  although  some  expressions  (missa  catechumenorum 
et  fidelium)  derived  from  them  still  remained.    A  monkish  custom,  in  imita- 
tion of  the  priests  of  Isis,  who  tried  to  assume  the  appearance  of  slaves  by 
dttving  their  heads,  was  so  far  adopted  by  the  clergy  of  the  fifth  century  in 
tbe  Roman  Church,  that  they  merely  made  bare  the  crown  of  the  head  (ton- 
sora  Petri).  Particular  kinds  of  vestments  were  also  adopted  by  the  clergy  for 
thdr  various  orders  and  dififerent  sacred  services.  A  white  woollen  cloak,  like 
the  holiday  costume  of  the  Greek  bishops  (u)fio<t>6piov,  pallium),  was  sent,  after 
the  Bxth  century,  by  the  popes  to  the  individual  bishops  of  tbe  West  as  a 
token  of  special  honor  and  of  connection  with  the  apostolic  see.    In  the  sev- 

/)  AeeonUng  to  different  Mooanti :  Sotom.  II,  1.  (coanteif^it  letter  of  Cyril  to  Ck)nstantiiu.) 
'^n&fofc  Or.  de  obita  Tbeododl.  Paulini  JMani  Ep.  81.  (al  11.)  oomp.  J.  Dallaeu»y  adv.  Latino- 
nm  d«  enltna  reL  objeeto  tradittonem.  Gen.  16M.  i.  p.  704b. 

0)  Aerording  to  JiuMard  and  MiddMon :  Blunt,  Yeatlfea  of  Ane.  Mannert  and  Cnstoma  dlicov- 
"^I^isia  Mod.  Italf  and  Bieilj.  Lond.  1888. 

^)  Chytandfr,  blet  Nachr.  v.  KOrgeln.  Bint  175S.  J.  Antony,  Oeacb.  Darrt.  d.  Entat  n.  Yer- 
^■i^iOrieLManatlSaa.     0)|  180.  note/ 


154     ANCIENT  CHUKCH  HISTORY.  FEB.  IL  IMPEBIAL  CHUBCH.  A.  D.  81»-800l 

enth  century,  Western  bishops  carried  with  them  the  ring  and  staff,  (d)  On 
Sunday^  Constant  ine  ordered  that  all  worldly  employments  should  cease,  except 
works  of  necessity  in  the  field,  and  the  manumission  of  slaves.  The  Roman 
festival  of  the  birth  of  Jesus,  on  the  twenty-fifth  of  December,  was  adopted 
also  in  the  East  in  the  time  of  Ghrysostom.  (e)  Epiphany  was  then  observed 
as  a  celebration  of  Ghrist^s  baptism,  and  in  the  West  had  a  reference  to  the 
Magi  as  the  first  fruits  of  the  heathen  world.  The  judaizing  Passover  having 
been  condemned  at  Nicaea,  those  who  observed  it  in  Asia  Minor  were 
regarded  as  heretics  (Tca-a-apcdcatdricarcrac,  Qnartodecimani.)  (/)  The  time 
for  the  festival  of  Easter  was  announced  at  Alexandria,  though  sometimes 
different  days  were  observed  in  different  provinces.  The  great  Fast  before 
Easter  was  prescribed  by  the  Church,  and  even  the  civil  law  required  that 
it  should  be  regarded  as  a  time  for  quiet  reflection,  though  the  number  of 
days  included  in  it  was  not  uniform.  (^)  Some  traces  of  a  pious  preparation 
for  Christmas  (adventus)  appear  in  the  seventh  century.  The  fortieth  day 
of  Pentecost  was  selected  in  the  fourth  century  for  the  commemoration  of 
the  Ascension  of  Christ  (toprfj  rrjs  dvakrjyfrtat.)  (h)  In  the  other  festivals  was 
exhibited  the  new  spirit  which  had  become  prevalent  in  that  age :  Lady- 
days,  including  the  feast  of  the  English  Annunciation  (^  tov  (vwyytXiafiov, 
annuntiationis,  March  25th),  and  that  of  the  churching  of  women  (purifica- 
tionis,  Feb.  2d);  (i)  a  festival  of  All  Martyrs,  which  occurs  in  the  Greek 
Church  on  the  Sunday  after  Pentecost,  and  of  All  Saints,  which  is  observed 
in  the  Roman  Church  on  the  Ist  of  November,  the  celebration  of  the  Hrst 
Martyrs  (Dec.  26th),  and  a  festival  for  martyrs  and  children  referring  to  the 
massacre  of  the  children  of  Bethlehem  (Dec.  28th).  The  heavenly  birth- 
days (deaths)  of  Peter  and  Paul  (June  29th)  were  observed  with  peculiar 
Bolenmity,  especially  in  Rome.  With  similar  pomp  was  observed  there  a  fes- 
tival in  honor  of  St,  Peter's  chair  (Feb.  22d),  which  originally  commemorated 
the  establishment  of  the  Roman  see,  but  being  connected  with  the  ancient 
Roman  feast  for  the  dead  (Feb.  19th),  finally  degenerated  into  a  sacrificial 
fbast  for  the  dead.  The  only  festival  yet  observed  in  honor  of  the  natural 
birth  of  any  saints,  was  that  of  John  the  Baptist,  on  the  day  of  the  year  in 
which  the  days  began  to  shorten.  (X)  The  yearly  festival  of  the  recovered 
cross  (Sept.  14th),  called  the  Elevation  of  the  Cross,  was  not  sufficient  to 
inspire  men  with  courage  to  defend  the  holy  sepulchre.  In  contrast  with 
the  heathenish  festivities  practised  at  the  commencement  of  the  secular  year, 
the  Church  at  first  set  apart  that  time  for  fasting;  but  in  the  seventh  century, 
Kew  Yeafs  day  was  in  some  places  connected  with  Christmas,  and  celebra- 
ted as  the  Feast  of  the  Circumcision.  The  Church  usually  commenced  the 
year  with  Easter,  though  in  some  instances  at  a  later  period  it  was  dated 


d)  J.  du  Tour^  de  orlgine,  antiqalt  et  sanctit  vestlnm  sacerdotallum.  Far.  1662.  4    PerUck,  de 
orig.,  tun  et  aactorit  pallli.  Ulmst.  1754.  A.    J.  A.  Schmidt  de  annulo  pastoralL  HImst  170&.  i. 

e)  Planck^  variar.  de  orig.  festi  nat  Chr.  sententt  eplcrisia.  Oott  1796.  4. 

/)  Eu9eb.  Vita  Const  III,  18.  oomp.  14    Soerat  I,  9.    Cdne.  Antioch,  can.  1.  7. 
g)  DaUaew,  de  jejanlls  et  quadragesima.  Daventr.  1654  18. 
h)  Horn.  Alter  d.  H.  F.  Feste&  (  WagnitM,  lit  Journ.  1806.  vol.  V.  sect  8.) 
i)  Schmidt^  prolofls.  Mariaoae  c  pradl  MokhemiL  Hlmat  1788.  4.    Lawhertini,  de  J.  C.  Ma- 
trisqae  feetifi  Patav.  176t  Bonn.  1766.  £     k)  AugusUni  Horn.  287.  oomp.  Jo.  8,  80. 


CHAP.  lY.    ECCLE&  LIFE.   $189.  CHUKCH  AKCniTECTUBE  &  DECOBATION.     155 

from  Advent.    Every  chnrch  celebrated  the  day  of  its  original  consecration, 
and  the  days  on  which  their  patron  saints  died. 

§  189.     Ecclesiastical  Architecture  and  Works  of  Sacred  Art, 

J^mfK  &im€iU,  antics  Bafcilicografla.  Neap.  168&  4.  J.  Fahricii^  Or.  de  templis  vet.  Chrlstt 
nimsL  1704.  4  GuU&ntihn  e  Knupp^  Monam.  di  reL  christ  ossia  raccolta  dello  antiche  cliiese  dl 
Soma  dal  quarto  Sec  Bom.  1S2255.  8  vols.  f.  PUttner  u.  RMUll^  Boms  Basillkcn.  (Be&chr.  d.  8tadt 
BiiDL  TuL  I.  p.  41788.)  (BunMn)  Die  Baslliken  d.  christl.  Bom.  M&ncli.  1S43.  t—3furatoH,  do  tcm- 
pUir.  apad  vet  chrisU.  omatn.  (Anecdota.  Th.  I.  p.  nSAS.)  «/.  G.  MuUer^  bildl.  Darst  Im  Sanctua- 
riani  d.  Kirchen  v.  5.  b.  14.  Jahrh.  Lintz.  lSi)6.— A ugunti,  Beltrage  z.  chr.  KunstOescb.  1841.  vol.  I. 
ISMt  vol  II.  [If.  G.  Knight,  Ecclea.  Arcb.  of  Italy  from  ConstL  to  15tb  cent  2  vols.  Lond.  1M4. 
Brmcn^  Sacred  Architcctare,  Its  rise,  prog.  &e,  Lond.  1S46.  4.  F.  Clo9e,  Cburcb  Arcb.  from  tbo  ear 
llest  ages  to  tlic  present  time.  Lond.  ISSO.  12.] 

Immediately  after  the  time  of  Constantine  sprung  up  in  all  parts  of  the 
empire  a  desire  as  well  as  a  necessity  of  building  churches.  They  were  gen- 
craHy  erected  over  the  graves  of  the  martyrs,  in  the  form  and  with  the  name 
of  the  Bwfilica.  This  was  an  oblong  parallelogram  divided  lengthwise  by 
double  or  qnadruple  rows  of  pillars,  and  terminating  in  a  semicircular  hall 
i^rjfia,  Sanctuarium).  Immediately  upon  these  pillars  rested  a  beam,  which 
in  wealthy  churches  was  overlaid  with  brass,  or  a  second  row  of  pillars  with 
arcades  (S.  Agneso),  and  above  these  a  rather  flat  gable-roof.  Before  the 
entrance  was  a  quadrangular  court  (atrium,  paradisns),  surrounded  with 
colonnades,  and  with  a  fountain  in  the  centre,  (a)  The  division  of  the  main 
body  of  the  church  by  a  partition  into  an  exterior  and  interior  apartment 
(tnpOrii  and  va6i\  was  probably  common  only  while  the  penitents  were  kept 
apart  from  the  congregation,  and  the  catechumens  were  numerous.  In  some 
cborcbes,  at  a  later  period,  the  exterior  hall  became  properly  a  porch.  In 
the  sanctuary,  separated  from  the  other  parts  by  lattice-work  and  curtains, 
stood  the  main  altar,  behind  which  were  the  seats  for  the  priests,  with  the 
episcopal  throne  in  the  centre.  Before  the  altar  was  an  elevated  choir  for 
the  angers,  by  the  side  of  which  was  a  pulpit  (afxfiav)  or  two.  Smaller 
churches,  and  in  general  baptisteries,  were  in  the  Roman  temple-form  of  the 
Rotunda,  surrounded  by  pillars  in  the  interior,  and  on  the  outside  by  a  gable- 
screen  open  pillars.  When  architecture  had  attained  a  more  perfect  Chris- 
tian character,  the  foundation  of  the  Basilica  gradually  assumed  the  form  of 
the  cross  (S.  Paolo,  386.)  This  was  either  the  Latin  cross,  when  the  longest 
arm  formed  the  nave,  or  the  Greek  cross,  when  all  the  arms  were  equal,  and 
by  connection  with  the  rotunda,  a  cupola  spanned  the  intersection  in  a  hemi- 
spherical vault,  so  as  to  be  an  image  of  the  heavens.  The  church  of  St. 
Sophia  in  Constantinople,  as  it  was  built  by  Justinian  after  the  conflagration 
(538),  is  the  principal  monument  of  this  style.  Pillars  and  other  ornaments 
were  frequently  taken  from  the  heathen  temples.  The  walls  especially  of 
the  sanctuary  were  adorned  with  figures  in  mosaic.  These  were  for  a  short 
time  opposed,  but  they  finally  triumphed,  not  so  much  on  account  of  any 
enthusiasm  for  the  arts,  as  from  the  general  tendency  of  men^s  minds  in  pub- 
lic worship.  Statues,  however,  were  always  excluded  from  the  oriental 
churches.    Modem  art  still  retained  some  of  the  skill  which  belonged  to 

a)  Euttb.  H.  ecc  X,  4. 


156     ANCIENT  OHUBCH  HISTORT.  FEB.  IL  IMPERIAL  CHURCH.  A.  D.  9i%-m(L 

antiquity.  But  a  pious  Teneration  at  an  early  period  produced  an  inyariable 
tradition,  that  our  Lord  should  be  represented  as  Saltator^  and  the  apostlee 
with  a  serious  and  dignified  aspect,  in  ancient  Roman  costume.  The  Mother 
with  her  child  was  painted  after  the  Nestorian  controversy.  Crucifixes  ap- 
pear in  the  seventh  century.  Subjects  for  the  arts  were  generally  taken  from 
sacred  histor}^  but  sometimes  the  lives  and  sufferings  of  the  saints,  and  even 
of  living  persons,  were  chosen.  (Jb)  In  opposition  to  all  representations  of 
the  Father,  it  was  alleged  that  he  was  visible  only  in  the  Son.  {c)  The  Tml- 
lan  Council  decided  against  the  ancient  representation  of  Christ  as  a  lamb,  {d) 
It  was,  however,  a  fundamental  principle  of  all  Christian  art,  that  the  visible 
was  to  be  only  a  type  of  the  invisible.  Pictures  or  images  were  to  be  a  sub- 
stitute for  books  to  those  who  could  not  read.  But  before  tliis,  Augustine 
had  complained  of  some  who  adored  the  image  itself,  and  women  excused  * 
their  splendid  garments  by  the  plea  that  they  were  embroidered  with  scenes 
from  sacred  history. 

§  140.     Iconoclast ie  C<mtroter»y, 

I.  Imperlalia  decreta  de  caltn  imaginnm,  eolL  et  lllnstr.  ft  Af.  ffaiminnfeldio  Goldatto,  Frcf.  IdOS. 
Jo.  DamascMii  A6yoi  i.xo\oyriTiKo\  Tphs  roht  ^lafidXKovras  rks  aylat  uK6yas.  (0pp.  Th.  L 
p.  SOSas.)    XicepKoH  Breviar.  IIU*.  (UU  TdQ.)  ed.  PeUirivs,  Par.  1616.     Tfuophanea.  (§  92.) 

II.  Dallaeus^  de  Imaglnib.  Lugd.  1642.  Mainibourg^  Hist  de  lli^rteie  des  Iconoclante^  Par. 
1679.  and  16S8.  8  Th.  12.  Sj>anhemU  Hist  imaglnnm  refltituta.  Lujid.  1686.  (0pp.  Th.  II.  I.)  WaM^ 
Ketzergeach.  yol  X  XL  F.  L.  SchloMer,  Gesch.  d.  Bllderstilnn.  Kaiser  des  ostrozn.  Keicha.  Frk£ 
1812.-V.  Jiarx,  d.  BUderstroit  d.  bjt.  Kaiser.  Trier.  1S89. 

A  worship  of  certain  persons  was  very  intimately  connected  with  a  wor- 
ship of  their  images.  Some  of  these  had  been  painted,  as  people  generally 
believed,  by  apostolic  hands,  or  had  been  miraculously  sent  down  from 
heaven,  and  were  therefore  supposed  to  be  worthy  of  adoration  (fiKovdXarpfia), 
But  the  spirit  of  primitive  Christianity  which  had  always  been  so  averse  to 
artificial  representations,  and  the  spiritual  view  of  it  which  had  recently 
been  revived  by  the  reproaches  of  the  votaries  of  Islam,  soon  took  ofifence  at 
what  seemed  a  new  form  of  heatlienism.  Leo  III.,  the  Isaurian,  had  all 
images  used  for  worship  removed  from  the  churches  (726),  and  becoming 
irritated  by  opposition,  he  proceeded  to  destroy  them  (730).  The  pious  sen- 
sibilities of  the  people  were  violently  wounded  by  this  proceeding  (ciVovo- 
«cXa<r/i<$r).  But  while  some,  during  the  conflict^  became  possessed  of  an  idol- 
atrous and  absurd  regard  for  images,  others  had  their  hatred  to  them  so  much 
inflamed,  that  the  persons  represented  by  them  became  objects  of  contempt. 
It  is  not  difficult,  therefore,  to  perceive  in  this  controversy  a  secret  struggle 
between  the  friends  of  progress  and  the  advocates  of  a  sensuous  devotion, 
between  the  Protestant  and  the  Catholic  principle.  Political  malcontents 
took  advantage  of  these  dissensions,  and  a  military  despotism  was  arrayed 
against  the  hierarchy.  Constantimis  Copronymvs  had  a  synod  convened  at 
Constantinople  (754),  which  claimed  to  be  oecumenical,  and  in  obedience  to 
the  imperial  requirement,  rejected  the  use  of  images,  (a)    But  the  monks,  in 


b)  PauUn.  Xolaru  NaUL  Felicia  carm.  9  et  10.    ^md.  Ep.  82. 

c)  OrHnMsen,  a.  bildL  Darst  d.  Ootth.  Btatti;.  1829.    d)  Can.  82. 

a)  The  decrees  maybe  learned  firom  the  Acts  of  tlie  Second  Nloaean  CJoonciL    [Landan''§  Maaaal 
of  Councils,  p.  187.] 


CHAP.  IT.  ECCLES.  LIFE.  %  IM.  ICONOCLAST&  .CHAP.  Y.  OPPOSITION.        1 57 

whose  convents  they  were  manofactnred,  placed  themselves  at  the  head  of 
the  popular  party,  and  after  some  encouragements  from  the  Roman  bisliop, 
raised  an  insurrection.  A  series  of  emperors,  in  fearfbl  hostility  to  the  feel- 
ings of  the  people,  continued  the  struggle  against  images.  Two  empresses 
decided  in  favor  of  them :  Irene^  by  whose  direction  the  seventh  cecnmenicol 
synod  at  Nicaea  (787)  recognized  the  propriety  of  image-worship,  (h)  and 
Theodora^  who,  after  many  vicissitudes  in  the  struggle,  proclaimed  the  vic- 
tory of  the  image-worshippers  (842),  by  appointing  an  annual  festival  in 
which  the  triumph  of  orthodoxy  (7  Kvpuucfj  rrjs  opdodo^iar)  should  be  com- 
memorated. 


CHAP,   v.— OPPONENTS  OF  THE  ORDINARY  EOCLESIASTICiVL 

SYSTEM. 

§  141.     General  View, 

As  Catholicism  became  more  and  more  developed,  individual  protests 
were  heard  against  every  departure  of  the  Church  from  the  simplicity  of 
tpostolical  Christianity.  This  protesting  spirit  was  shown  sometimes  by 
teachers  of  high  standing,  when  they  boldly  reproved  crimes  committed  in 
the  Church,  and  advocated  a  spiritual  worship  instead  of  one  which  was 
merely  external,  and  sometimes  by  men  in  inferior  stations,  but  w^ith  a  more 
decided  and  hostile  opposition  to  the  Church  of  their  age.  Among  these  we 
should  distinguish  between  those  parties  which  were  striving  to  exceed  the 
ordinary  Church  in  strictness  and  purity,  but  which  came  down  from  earlier 
times,  and  those  which  had  recently  sprung  up  in  opposition  to  the  now  ten- 
dency of  the  ecclesiastical  spirit. 

§  142.     The  DonatisU. 

L  Optatua  MUevUanu§  (about  86S),  de  scbiflmate  DonatiMtarum,  also,  Monumenta  vett.  ad  Do- 
latSst  Hist  pertlnentia,  t±  L.  K  Du  Pin,  Par.  1700s.  Augustine's  Controv.  Writing.  0pp.  Th.  IX. 

IL  VoUmIum,  d«  schism.  Donatist  (following  his  edit  of  Euseb.)  Hist  Donatlat  ex.  KorUdanU 
Mbedis  exoerpta.  {NarUii  0pp.  eddL  BulUrini^  Yeron.  1729aflL  t  Th.  IV.)  WalcK,  Kotzergesch.  vol 
IT.    A.  Bowty  de  Angoat  adTeraarlo  Donatlrt.  Lugd.  B.  1S88. 

The  schism  of  the  Donatists  was  produced  by  those  who  favored  a  rigid 
ind  inexorable  ecclesiastical  discipline,  in  opposition  to  the  lenient  and  pru- 
dent policy  of  the  later  Church,  and  those  who  longed  for  martyrdom.    When 
Ctecilianus,  who  as  an  archdeacon  had  been  unfriendly  to  the  confessors,  was 
chosen  Bishop  of  Carthnge,  and  was  ordained  by  a  traditor  (311),  those  who 
were  opposed  to  him  set  up  Ifajorinvs  as  a  rival  bishop.    The  latter  was 
mcceeded  by  Donatus^  called  by  his  adherents  the  Great,  who  with  his  friend 
Donatui  of  Casae-nigra  gave  name  to  his  party.     In  their  views  of  the 
Church,  and  in  the  ezclusiveness  with  w:hich  they  administered  baptism,  this 
Kct  only  adhered  to  the  primitive  African  traditions.    On  their  application 
to  Constantine,  a  commission  was  appointed  at  Rome  (813),  and  a  synod  was 
assembled  at  Arelate  (314),  to  investigate  their  cause.    In  conformity  with 


()  CVmc  Nlea«n,  IL  Acts  In  ManH  Th.  XIL  p.  951.-XIIL  p.  820.    [Summary  of  them  Id  Lan- 


158     ANCIENT  CHURCH  IIISTOBT.  PER.  IL  IMPERIAL  CHURCH.  A.  D.  81S<«0a 

the  decision  of  these  bodies,  severe  laws  were  proclaimed  by  the  emperor 
against  them.  Bat  the  peasants  and  some  wandering  tribes  of  Numidia  and 
Mauritania  (Agonistici,  Circnmcelliones),  who  had  never  really  been  subject 
to  the  Roman  dominion,  seized  their  clubs  to  avenge  the  conflagration  of 
their  churches,  and  the  blood  of  some  of  their  priests.  With  a  wild  love  of 
slaughter,  they  maintained  during  the  fourth  century  a  predatory  war  with 
tlie  Catholic  Church  and  the  Roman  empire.  Augustine  endeavored  to  con- 
ciliate or  to  confute  the  milder  portion  of  this  party  (411),  but  with  little 
success.  They  were  finally  overcome  by  the  Roman  laws  and  legions,  but 
not  until  individuals  had  struggled  and  suffered  on  till  some  time  in  the  sev- 
enth century,  and  had  shown  the  prodigious  power  which  even  a  mistaken 
faith  may  exert  over  sincere,  vigorous  and  gloomy  dispositions. 

§  143.    Audians,    Massalians, 

Audius  broke  off  from  the  Church  in  Mesopotamia,  because  it  paid  no 
attention  to  his  formal  reproofs,  and  he  finally  established  monastic  commu- 
nities in  Soythia  (about  840),  which  observed  the  passover  according  to  the 
Jewish  mode,  and  are  said  to  have  believed  that  (xod  possesses  a  human 
form,  {a)  The  Christian  Massalians  ("p^SQ ,  Evxtraiy  in  Armenia  and  Syria, 
after  860)  held,  that  to  overcome  the  evil  disposition  of  the  natural  heart,  it 
was  necessary  to  pray  internally  without  intermission  ;  that  all  other  means 
of  grace  were  indifferent,  and  that  labor  waa  sinful.  They  wandered  about 
and  begged,  refusing  to  hold  any  property  of  their  own  on  earth.  All  traces 
of  them  disappear  in  the  seventh  century,  (b) 

§  144.     PrUeillianvis, 

Svlpic  Sit.  U.  racr.  II.  46-51.  Ill,  ll!«.  Oronii  Commonltorlam  ad.  Aug.  de  errore  PrisdlliaiH 
IsUr.  (Aug.  Oi)p.  Th.  \\\\.)^Walch,  Ketzerhlst  vol  III.  p.  87888.  &  ran  Vries^  de  PriscilllAnbtls. 
Tri^.  1745.  4.    «/.  //.  &  LUhkert,  de  haerei»i  PriscilUanlstar.  Uaon.  184a 

Under  Manichaean  influence  a  Gnostic  party  more  rigid  than  the  Church 
was  formed  under  Priscillianus  (379),  the  object  of  which  was,  by  unusual 
self-denials  and  efforts,  to  release  the  spirit  from  its  natural  life.  At  the 
Synod  of  Caemr  Augmtta  (380),  ItaciuSy  a  bishop,  procured  their  condemna- 
tion, and  obtained  from  the  emperor  Gratian  a  decree,  according  to  which 
they  were  no  longer  to  be  tolerated  on  earth.  But  having  gained  the  favor 
of  the  court,  they  began  to  think  of  persecuting  their  opponents,  when  Gra- 
tian was  hurled  from  his  throne  by  his  general  Maximus.  The  usurper  gave 
his  countenance  to  the  party  of  Itacius,  and  Priscillian  was  summoned  to 
Treves,  where  he  was  put  to  death  by  the  sword  (885).  This  was  the  first 
time  in  which  the  blood  of  a  heretic  was  shed  by  the  solemn  forms  of  law. 
The  Church  was  struck  with  horror  at  the  act.  The  Priscillianists,  roused  to 
enthusiasm  by  the  blood  of  their  martyr,  survived  the  persecution  until  some 
time  in  the  sixth  century. 

a)  Epiph.  haer.  70.     Tkeodoret  haer.  fabb.  IV,  10.  H.  ecc  IV,  9. 

h)  Epiph.  haer.  80.     Theodoret  haer.  fltbb.  IV,  11.  H.  ecc  IV,  10.    Photii  cod.  58. 


CSAP.  y.    OPPOSITION.    |145lAERIU9.    J0VINIANU8.    $  146.  PAULICIAN8.     159 

§  146.    Protesting  Ecclesiastical  Teachers. 

AerivSy  a  presbyter  in  Sebaste,  in  opposition  to  his  former  iriend  and 
bishop  Eusiathivs^  taught  that  there  was  no  essential  distinction  between 
bishops  and  presbyters;  that  fasts  ordained  by  the  authority  of  the  Church 
were  Jewish  compulsory  forms,  and  that  prayers  and  alms  were  of  no  avail 
for  the  dead.  This  schism  at  Sebaste  appears  to  have  become  extinct  prin- 
cipally because  the  monastic  ethics  of  Eustathius  were  rejected  at  the  Synod 
of  Gangra  (between  862  and  870).  {a)  Jovinianus^  a  Koman  ascetic,  maintained 
that  there  was  no  difference  before  God  between  fasting  and  a  pious  enjoy- 
ment of  food,  nor  between  a  state  of  celibacy  and  an  honorable  wedlock,  and 
that  a  difference  in  good  works  presents  no  reason  for  expecting  different 
degrees  of  reward.  For  these  opinions  he  was  expelled  from  the  Church, 
first  by  his  bishop  Sirtcivs^  and  then  on  the  report  of  that  prelate,  by  Ambro- 
ntu  of  Milan,  to  whom  he  had  applied  for  redress  (about  888).  (h)  VigHan- 
(tut,  a  native  of  Oaul  and  a  presbyter  in  Barcelona,  in  an  eloquent  treatise 
denouioed  the  ecclesiastical  superstition  of  honoring  deceased  persons  as  idol- 
itry,  vi^ls  as  occasions  for  licentiousness,  and  vows  of  chastity  as  tempta- 
tiona  to  unnatural  lusts,  and  maintained  that  it  was  far  more  Christian  to 
use  in  a  wise  and  beneficent  way  the  property  which  had  been  inherited, 
than  to  cast  it  away  as  a  burden.  He  was  favored  by  his  bishop  and  some 
nogfaboring  prelates,  but  Hieronymus  defended  against  him  the  customs  of 
the  Church  with  all  his  accustomed  asperity,  (c) 

§  146.    History  of  the  Faulieians,    Sect,  I. 

L  Pttm*  8ictd»t  (about  870)  l<rropia  wtpl  r^r  alp4a'fuf  Mavixa^»y  Twy  kou  HavXtKiap&p 
krfpJvmv,  gr.  et  Ut  ed.  RaderM,  Ingolat  1604.  4.  Gietdsr,  Oott  1840.  4.  PhoUw,  wtpi  r^t 
Uanxaimw  kyafiKcurrfifftcts,  ( Wdjii  Anecdot  gr.  Hunb.  1722.  Th.  I.  If.  &,  GaUandii  BibL  Th. 
MIL)  Jo,  Danuue,  AidXoyos  Kark  Moofixtii^^'  (Opp.  Th.  L  p.  429a».)  Jo.  Omientit^  Armo- 
ifonun  Catfaollcl,  Or.  c  Paullciiinofl,  aft^r  718.  (0pp.  ed.  Aucher^  Ven.  1884.  Conip.  Windiachmann 
lid.T&b.  Qoartabchr.  18S5i  P.  1.  Formula  reccptlonis  Manich.  ( ToZZ/J  loMgnia  Itin.  ItalicL  p.  144aft.) 

IL  Frid.  Sckmid,  Hlat  PauUctanorum  orlentallam.  Hafta.  1826.  {Engelhardf)  Die  Paullc.  (WI- 
Mn  XL  Engelb.  Jootd.  1827.  vol  VII.  Part  1.  2.)  GiueUr^  Q.  d.  Paalic.  (Stud.  u.  Krit  1829.  vol.  II. 
P.L) 

Constantiney  from  the  neighborhood  of  Samosata,  and  connected  with  a 
Gnostic  congregation  at  Cibossa  in  Armenia,  found  in  the  perusal  of  the  New 
Testament  a  world  unknown,  and  became  animated  with  the  hope  (about  660), 
of  bringing  back  a  state  of  things  like  that  which  had  prevailed  in  the  Apos- 
tolic Church.  He  assumed  the  name  of  Sylvanus,  and  called  those  commu- 
iritieg  which  acknowledged  him  as  a  Reformer,  Pauline  congregations.  By 
their  opponents  they  were  called  Paulicians  (at  first  according  to  I.  Cor.  1, 12); 

o)Splph.  baer.  75.  Gangra:  ManH  Tb.  II.  p.  lOdSas.  comp.  JSocrat  II,  43.  [Art  In  Kltto*s 
*»"Ml  or  BIbL  Lit  Tol.  IV.] 

i)8tHcHEp.  ad  dWereos  Episc.  adv.  Jorln.  (Corutanl  p.  668sb.)  Ambroaii  Kosoript  ad  Slric 
(^-  ^JI70M.)  ffUron.  L  IL  adv.  Jovln.  (892.)    Augustin. :  De  bacr.  c  82.    De  bono  conjugall.  De 

lTll|lBit 

«)  Bitron.  Ep.  87.  ad  Kipnarlnm  a.  404  and  Liber  adv.  Yigll.  a.  406.  (Th.  lY.)  Gfnnadii  de  vlr. 
fiutr.  e.  SCl-V.  G.  Watch,  de  Ylg.  baeretlco-orthodoxo.  Jen.  1756.  {PottH  SylL  Cmtt  tbeoL  Th. 
^)  Q.  B.  Lindner^  d«  Jovln.  At  YlglL  porlorls  doctr.  anteslgnanii.  Lpa.  1840. 


160     ANCIENT  CUUBCn  UISTOBY.  PER.  IL  OEBMANIC  CHURCH.  A.  D.  81»-aoa 

bnt  they  themselves  acknowledged  no  name  bnt  that  of  Christians,  and  ap- 
plied the  title  of  Romans  to  the  Catholics.  They  adhered  to  the  Gnostic  doc- 
trines which  maintained  that  the  history  of  the  worid  exhibits  only  the  strug- 
gle between  the  good  and  the  evil  principles,  that  Judaism  was  the  work  of 
an  inferior  spirit,  that  the  Old  Testament  was  no  part  of  the  holy  Scriptures 
(Jo.  10,  8),  and  that  the  conflict  of  the  flesh  with  the  spirit  was  in  conse- 
quence of  their  creation  by  two  different  creators.  Their  principal  attention 
however,  was  directed  to  a  revival  of  apostolic  and  spiritual  Christianity. 
On  every  subject  they  appealed  to  the  New  Testament  as  a  sacred  book  for 
the  people  in  the  text  used  by  the  Church,  but  with  the  exclusion  of  the 
Epistles  of  Peter.  They  rejected  all  the  external  forms  then  in  use,  as  the 
ecclesiastical  system,  fasts  and  monasticism,  worship  of  saints  and  of  Mary, 
crosses  and  relicts,  and  regarded  baptism  and  the  Lord's  supper  as  only 
spiritual  acts.  Constantine  was  killed  (about  684)  by  a  traitor,  but  at  the  in- 
stigation of  an  imperial  ofiicer.  The  community  always  had  a  chief  like  him, 
and  called  after  one  of  the  companions  of  Paul,  but  neither  he  nor  any  of  his 
fellow-pilgrims  (ovveK^rj^i)  and  scribes  (pordpioi)  exercised  any  hierarchical 
powers.  As  they  were  joined  by  some  Manichaean  congregations  and  were 
favored  by  the  iconoclasts,  the  Paulicians  spread  over  the  extreme  provinces 
of  Asia,  in  spite  of  bloody  persecutions  from  without,  and  their  own  internal 
divisions.  Their  principal  city  was  Phanaroea  in  Helenopontns.  Some  of 
them  considered  it  right  to  adopt  the  doctrines  of  the  Church  with  an  alle- 
gorical signification,  and  to  submit  to  the  external  forms  of  the  Catholic  wor- 
ship, on  the  ground  that  these  might  be  beneficial  to  the  body.  The  death 
of  Constantine  was  so  heroic  that  the  very  judge  who  condemned  him,  after 
some  years,  left  the  capital  of  that  region  to  take  his  place.  The  reproach 
of  unnatural  licentiousness  which  was  cast  upon  them  may  have  been  occa- 
sioned by  their  entire  disregard  of  the  Mosaic  prohibitions  with  respect  to 
consanguinity.  It  is,  however,  possible  that  their  opposition  to  the  law  near 
the  end  of  the  eighth  century,  may  have  given  occasion  to  a  moral  degene- 
racy, of  which  their  overseer,  Baanes  (6  pvTrap6s%  may  have  been  the  most 
prominent  specimen. 


DIVISION  II.-THE  GERMANIC  CHDECH. 

§  147.     Original  Authoritiu, 

I.  SemUr^  Yen.  den  Gebr.  d.  Qaellen  in  d.  Staats-u.  KOesch.  d.  mltU.  Zeiten  zu  erleicbtern.  HaL 
1761.  RdtUr^  de  annalium  medii  aevi  condit  &,  do  arte  crit  in  ann.  Tub.  ITSSs.  4  Dahlmann^ 
Qncllcnknnde  d.  deutschen  Gcscb.  Gott  (1S80.)  ^^^.—Mfibomii  rcr.  Germ.  8criptore&  Himst  1888hl 
8  Th.  t  LeibniU,  Scrr.  rer.  Bransvic.  illostrationi  inserviontea.  Han.  ITOTss.  8  Th.  t  I*reheri  nr. 
Oorm.  8crr.  ed  Struve,  Argent  ITUsa  8  Tb.  f.  UarzhenM  Concilia  Germ.  (Ull  1747.)  CoL  1759a>. 
11  Th.  t  Ussermanni  Monuuienta  res  Alcmonnicas  illu5tr.  Typis  S.  Blasian.  1790.  2  vol&  4  Perta, 
Mon.  Genu,  biatorica.  Han.  lS26s&  8  Tb.  t—Du  Oheme^  ITist  Francor.  Scrr.  Tar.  16S6ea.  5  Tb.  £ 
Souqu^Dom  Brlal,  rer.  Gallicar.  ot  Franc  Scrr.  Par.  178S-1833.  19  Tb.  t--Muratori,  rer.  ItaL 
Scrr.  Medlol  1723m.  21  Tb.  t—Eccard,  Corpus  blst  mcdli  aevi.  Lpst  1728.  2  Tb.  f.  1)  Gregor,  TV- 
rofuns.  Hist  eceL  Francor.  L  X.  till  594,  selected  from  iSs  cont  by  Fredegar  Ull  641.  cd.  Ruinar% 
Par.  1699.  £  {Bouquet^  Tb.  IL  p.  75.)  Beda  VenerabUU,  Hi!»t  eccl.  gentis  Angler.  L  V.  till  78L 
Ed.  Jo.  Smith,  Cantabr.  1722.  £  Siavensan^  Lend.  1838.    [Bede'a  Ecclea.  Ubt  with  the  Sax.  Cbron. 


DIF.  U.    OEEMANIC  CHUBCII.    $  147.  OKIGINAL  AUTMORITIEa.  161 

trnisL  Into  EdrL  tritb  notes,  m«p9,  &c  bj  J^  ^.  t7^/«t,  Lond.  1845.]  2)  Jomandes,  de  reb.  Oeticls 
tin  5401  Kd.  Fabric  Hwnb.  170«.  t  {Muratorl  Th.  I.  P.  L  p.  187.)  Mdor.  Hisp.  Hist  Gothorom. 
TandaloniiD,  Suevoram  till  625.  Ed.  RdtUr,  Tub.  ISOa.  4.  Jsidor.  Paeen*.  (about  754.)  Chronlcon. 
{Bmrigue  FtoreM^  £sp«&a  sagrada.  Madr.  174'^  Th.  VIII.  Dw  Ch^9ne  Th.  I.)  Paulua  Warne- 
fridi,  Di^icoHus,  de  gestis  Longobard.  I.  VL  till  744.  {Maratori  Th.  I.  P.  I.  p.  895.)  8)  Annalos  rer. 
Fraodcaram :  LaurU»mw9  741-S29,  rerlsed  Jb  cont  since  78S  by  Einhard.  {Pertz  Th.  I.  p.  124.) 

XL  J?fiA«,  Oeacb.  d.  Mittelalt  BrL  1816.  Jlallam,  [SUte  of  Europe  daring  the  Middle  Ages. 
Lond.  1$4«.  8  vols.  &  New  York,  1817.  8.]  Luden^  Gcsch.  d.  M^V.  Jen.  182U  2  vol&  Rehm^  Gesch. 
d  MA.  BlAfb.  1831-S5i  8  tola.  Leo,  Gescb.  d.  MA.  HaL  1830.  2  vols.  MoelUr,  Procls  de  Tllist.  du 
omjco  &ge.  Lout.  1S41.  Gibbon  &  Schlotser  in  their  larger  works.—  Wdch^mvtJiy  earop.  Sitten- 
pteh.  LpaL  lS31-8a  2  vols  Charpentier,  Hist  Htt^raire  du  moyen  fige.  Par.  188-S.— /?.  r.  Pawner, 
die  Einwirk.  d.  Christenth.  a.  d.  Altbochdeutsche  Bprache.  Stuttg.  1S45.  F.  W.  ReUberg,  KGesch. 
DeotKblands.  Oott  1846.  vol.  I.  [F.  Koklratuch  Hist  of  Germ,  transl.  by  J.  D,  Ilaae.  New  York. 
1817.  %.  J.  J.  Matcon,  Hist  of  the  Ancient  Germans,  transl.  by  Lediard,  Lond.  1833.  2  vols.  4.  T. 
Gntnwocd^  First  Book  of  the  Hist  ct  the  Germans:  Barbaric  Period.  Lond.  1836.  4  S.  A.  Jhin- 
ham,  H.  of  Enr.  daring  the  Mid.  Agesw  Lond.  4  vols.  12.  W.  Meruel,  H.  of  Germ.  transL  by  O.  Uor- 
Lond.  1848. 8  voLei  12.    GviMOi,  H.  of  Civilization.  New  York.  1810.  4  vol&  12.] 


A  picture  of  this  age  is  especially  to  be  fonnd  in  some  contemporary  bio- 
graphies {a)  and  letters  (5)  of  persons  prominent  in  the  Church  or  State  of 
that  day.    A  vivid  representation  of  Gterman  affairs,  as  they  would  appear  to 
a  Roman,  is  given  by  Frocopius.  (e)    The  German  historical  writers  were  ex- 
doflively  clergymen,  and  confine  their  attention  to  their  ovn  respective  na- 
tbns,  with  only  occasional  glances  at  the  affairs  of  others  in  the  vicinity. 
Gregory  of  Tojurs  (d.  595)  and  the  Venerable  Bede  (d.  735)  wrote  ecclesiasti- 
cal histories.     The  former,  with  an  honest  simplicity  and  an  excessive  faith, 
described  a  rude  age  as  a  warning  to  all  who  might  be  tempted  to  treat  the 
Church  with  violence,  {d)    The  latter  collected  together  the  original  documents 
and  traditions  relating  to  the  history  of  the  English  Church,  as  they  existed 
among  the  clergy,  and  presented  them  in  a  learned  style  and  in  the  spirit  of 
the  Anglo-Saxon  Church,  for  the  instruction  of  subsequent  ages.    Jornande^ 
(Jordanis,  about  550),  a  monk,  possibly  a  bishop,  but  at  an  earlier  period  a 
private  secretary,  an  Ostrogoth  but  not  an  Arian,  wrote  a  history  of  hig  na- 
tkm  both  in  the  East  and  in  the  West.    His  was  the  first  German  voice  heard 
in  the  midst  of  the  national  migrations.    Ilis  materials  were  principally  de- 
rived from  Roman  authorities,  and  his  notices  of  ecclesiastical  affairs  are  not 
▼ery  abundant.    Paul  (d.  799),  the  son  of  Wamefrid^  a  monk  of  Montecassino, 
belonging  to  the  literary  circle  around  Charles  the  Great,  collected  and  incor 
pwated  in  his  history  of  the  Longobards,  the  lively  traditions  preserved  among 
the  people.    Ecclesiastical  subjects  always  seemed  interesting  to  him,  but  he 
W  introduced  them  but  sparingly  into  his  narrative.    In  the  Annals  of  the 
WDTent  of  Lorseh^  as  well  as  in  those  of  Bginhard,  the  exploits  of  the  Frank- 
iib  kings,  and  their  relations  to  the  Church,  are  recorded  in  a  simple  and  con- 
^ityle,  but  with  respect  to  the  principal  facts  in  the  animated  language 
^  interested  witnesses. 

•)  Qtoerally  In  PsrU.  Th.  I.  IL    b)  Especially  Epp.  Bonif.  &  Codes  Oarolinut, 

^  De  beOo  Tandalico.    De  bello  Oothica  Ed.  G.  Dindorf,  Bonn.  1888.  2  vols. 

*)  UbtO,  Gregor.  v.  Toura  u.  a.  Zeit  Lpi.  1885.    C.  G.  KrUe,  de  Greg.  Tur.  ViU  et  Scriptls. 


11 


162     ANCIENT  CHUBCn  HISTORY.  PER.  IL  OEBMANIC  CnUBOlL  A.  D.  812-800. 

OHAP.  I.— ESTABLISHMENT  OF  CHRISTIANITY. 
§  148.    Religion  of  the  Germans, 

L  1)  TnciH  Gena  c  2.  9. 11.  27.  89.  4a  4a  40l  Annal  XIII,  57.  Hist  lY,  64  2)  Abronnntiatio 
dfaboll  A  Indicolos  saporetitlonnm  et  papmUrnm,  c  a.  748.  (Epp.  Boni/btc  ed.  Wurdtto.  p.  12te& 
Parta  Th.  III.  p.  198.)    Gapitalatlo  de  parttb.  Sax.  ( WalUr^  Corp.  Jur.  Oenn.  Tb.  II.  p.  104ss.) 

IL  jtfbn^,  Gesch.  d.  Heidenth.  im  nordl.  Earopa.  Lpa.  n.  Darmst  1822a.  vol  II.  p.  1-822.  Jac 
Grimm,  Deatache  Mythologle.  Gutt  (1S8A.)  1S40.  Z.  VTdand^  d.  Mythns  v.  Tbor.  Stuttg.  1888.  O. 
Klemm,  Handb.  d.  germ.  Altertbamskando.  Dread.  1886.  [Z>.  MalUt^  Nortbem  AnUqultka^ 
Lond.  lS4a  &) 

When  the  Gennans  first  began  to  have  intercourse  with  the  Roman  Em- 
pire, either  as  allies  or  as  enemies,  they  were  trained,  not  for  civilization, 
but  for  military  freedom.  They  were  a  bdd,  faithful,  and  chaste  people,  high- 
spirited  whether  in  life  or  death,  living  by  agriculture  or  by  the  sword,  and 
addicted  to  no  excesses  but  those  of  the  table.  Their  women  were  admitted 
to  equal  privileges  with  themselves,  and  indeed  were  supposed  to  possess  a 
peculiarly  holy  and  prophetic  character.  Their  history  was  preserved  in  oral 
traditions  and  poems.  Their  religion,  as  described  by  Tacitus,  was  a  respect- 
ful awe  in  the  presence  of  a  mysterious  power,  which  ruled  over  all  things 
and  was  worshipped  by  all  who  spoke  a  common  language,  however  variously 
apprehended  by  different  tribes.  In  the  ancient  songs,  Thuisto^  a  deity  which 
sprung  from  the  earth,  and  his  son  Mannus^  the  man,  are  extolled  as  the  an- 
cestors of  the  nation.  The  Semnones  boasted  that  they  were  in  possession 
of  the  most  ancient  sanctuary.  There  a  divinity  who  ruled  over  all  was  wor- 
shipped in  a  forest  so  sacred  that  none  could  enter  it  but  in  fetters.  The 
deputies  of  all  the  tribes  belonging  to  the  same  race  assembled  there  to  cele- 
brate a  festival  for  the  whole  confederacy.  On  such  an  occasion  a  hnman 
being  was  offered  up  in  sacrifice,  as  none  but  the  most  exalted  being  of  earth 
appeared  to  them  worthy  of  the  Deity.  Captives  taken  in  war  were  gene- 
rally the  victims,  and  in  extreme  circumstances  a  whole  hostile  army  was  de- 
voted to  death.  On  an  island  of  the  ocean  was  a  grove  sacred  to  Bertha 
(Northns).  At  times  her  veiled  chariot  was  drawn  forth  dispendng  joy  and 
peace  among  the  people.  On  her  return  the  goddess  and  her  chariot  were 
plunged  into  a  mysterious  sea,  and  all  the  slaves  who  had  attended  her  were 
swallowed  up  in  the  waves.  Other  gods  are  mentioned  by  Tacitus,  but  with 
Roman  names.  There  was  a  god  of  wisdom,  another  of  power,  another  of 
war,  and  two  youthful  brothers  like  Castor  and  Pollux,  but  natives  of  the 
country,  and  served  by  a  priest  in  a  woman^s  appareL  Victory  in  battle  was 
the  gift  of  the  gods.  These  were  supposed  to  have  their  home  beyond  the 
great  ocean  from  which  their  forms  were  sometimes  seen  to  emerge  and  iUa> 
minate  all  around  them  by  the  beams  which  streamed  from  their  heads.  Per- 
sons praying  turned  their  eyes  toward  the  heavens.  The  Germans  thought 
it  inconsistent  with  the  greatness  of  celestial  beings  to  be  confined  by  walls, 
or  to  be  represented  by  a  human  form.  Groves  and  forests  were  their  saored 
places,  and  they  applied  the  name  of  God  to  that  mystery  which  they  oould 
reverently  contemplate  only  in  the  inner  spirit.    Unlike  the  Gauls  (a)  in  these 


o)  CoMar,  de  bello  OalL  YI,  21. 


CHAP.  L    E8TABL.  OF  ens.    f  14$).  OERMANIO  BELI6I0N.  163 

respects,  they  had  no  priestly  caste,  nor  splendid  sacrificial  rites,  but  priests 
presided  oyer  their  sacred  things  and  in  the  religious  assemblies  of  the  people, 
and  corporeal  punishments  could  be  inflicted  on  ireemen  only  in  the  name  of 
the  godsL  The  military  weapons  of  a  deceased  person  were  buried  with  his 
body  in  the  grave.  Such  was  the  religion  which  the  first  Christian  mission- 
aries called  the  worship  of  the  devil.  The  Irminml  was  then  regarded 
among  the  Saxons  with  especial  veneration,  because  it  was  supposed  to  be  the 
pillar  which  sustained  the  universe.  This  was  only  a  vestige  of  the  imageless 
▼orahip  of  the  one  God,  and  was  connected  with  recollections  of  nermann 
the  national  hero,  (b)  The  gods  worsliipped,  though  with  different  degrees 
of  honor  among  different  tribes,  were :  Wuotan^  the  arbiter  of  worlds  and  of 
battles,  and  the  father  of  heroes  and  of  kings ;  Thunar^  the  god  of  war  and 
of  thunder,  to  whom  were  dedicated  the  most  ancient  oaks ;  Fro^  who  dis- 
pensed peace  and  fertility ;  Freyja^  the  lovely  consort  of  Wuotan,  and  Fostra^ 
the  goddess  of  Spring,  (c)  Later  traditions  give  us  slight  notices  of  Fran 
Bolla  in  Lower  Germany,  and  of  Frau  Bertha  in  Upper  Germany,  beautiful 
goddesses  of  the  earth  who  preside  over  the  affairs  of  the  household  and  of 
hoabandry.  The  gods  were  supposed  to  look  down  upon  men  through  the 
▼indowB  of  heaven,  and  to  direct  human  destiny,  {d)  Though  the  old  sane- 
toaries  under  the  canopy  of  the  lofty  forest  were  sometimes  seen  at  the  period 
of  which  we  are  writing,  sometimes  too  might  be  found  temples  and  images 
of  the  gods.  Offerings  were  also  presented  at  fountains  and  rocks,  and  in 
times  of  peculiar  joy  or  necessity,  human  sacrifices  were  ofibred.  In  some  in- 
itances  in  which  men  could  not  determine  what  was  right,  the  judgment  was 
nbmitted  to  God,  and  the  method  most  preferred  was  the  duel.  So  strong 
was  the  hope  of  meeting  friends  in  another  world,  that  the  Friesan  king,  Rad- 
bot,  scorned  the  Christianas  heaven,  from  which  his  predecessors  were  ex- 
dnded.  (e) 

S  149.    Religian  of  the  Northern  Germanic  Nations, 

L  The  older  Edda  collected  by  Saemund  SifffuMon  (d.  1188.)  lu  Ireland:  Edda  Saemundar 
MiM  FrSda,  Edda  rhythtnica,  Saemnndina  dicta,  ed.  Tliorlaciut^  Finn  Magnusen,  etc.  Hafh. 
17Si-18Sa.  a  Tb.  4  Miniature  ed.  e.  rca  limkii  cur.  A/kelitt«,  Holm.  1813.  Translations  of  most  of 
tb«9uogi  (in  Germ.)  by  nav«n^  Brl.  1812.  BresL  18U.  Grimm,  Brl.  1816.  LeQi»,  Lps.  18299S.  8  toU. 
Tbe  pnse  Kdda,  was  commenced  by  Snorre  Slurleton  (d.  1241),  and  was  completed  In  the  14th  cent : 
^^trv-Eida  faamt  Skildu  af  Rtuk.  Stock.  1818.  Uebers.  v.  R&ha.  Brl.  1812.  Mu^pilli,  hreg.  v. 
SdmtOtr,  (Buchner's  Beitrige,  Mun.  1882.  vol.  L  P.  2.)  Auxiliary  sources :  For  the  northern  heroic 
^H.  M»  MUUr,  Sagabibliothek.  KJob.  1817.  8  Th.    Uebern.  d.  1.  a  Lachmann,  BrL  1816.    Baxo 

Onnnatieas  and  Adam  Bremensia. 
U.  After  the  investigations  of  JSuhm^  Thorlaciua  and  Finn  MagnuMn,  Gen.  reviews :  Grundt- 

*<f,  Senlcna  Mytology.  Kj  >b.  (1808.)  1882.     Stuhr,  Glanb.  Wiss.  n.  Diet  dor  alt  Skandinavier. 

Kopnh.  1&8&    jr<m«,  vol.  L  p.  216-479.    Munter,  KGesch.  v.  Dunem.  u.  Norw.  Lpz.  1828.  vol.  I.  p. 

1-^    Dtrctink'Holm/eldy  nord.  Vorzeit  Kopenb.  1S28&  2  P.  (Petersen  u.  Thomsen)  LeitC  z. 

^'^  AkMtbnmsknnde  hrrg.  v.  d.  konigl.  Gcsellsch.  £  nord.  Alterth.  Uebera.  v.  PauUen,  Kopenb. 

%  [MaiUL  (S  147.)  JT.  F.  Wiborg,  Die  Mythol.  des  Nordens  a.  d.  Danlsch.  v.  Anton  r.  Ettel, 

M  L  Aril,  Th.  L  p.  228.  Th.  IL  p.  676.— IL  J.  Grimm,  Irmenstraase  n.  Irmensilule.  Wien.  1315. 
^^  Innta.  BreaL  1817. 

<)  Bfda,  De  temper,  rat  c.  18. 

<)  P9mL  Diae.  I,  &    GHmm,  MythoL  Edit  1.  p.  968& 

<)  Jmu  yitM  &  Walfrunl  e.  9.  (JfoMMon,  Acta  89.  Benedict  Saea  IIL  P.  1.)  Comp.  AppiatU 
*^««iIV,ia. 


164     ANCIENT  CHUBCn  UISTORY.  VKH  II.  GERMANIC  CIirRCU.  A.  D.  818-800. 

BerL  1847.  G.  PigotU  Manna)  of  Scand.  Myth.  Lond.  1S89.  a  A.  Crlchton,  ScandiiiAvia,  Anc.  and 
Mod.  Edinb.  1839.  2  vcls.  12.  WhMtotr$  lliflt  of  the  Northmen.  2  ed.  New  York.  1847.  If.  ChrM- 
mat^  Universal  Myth.  p.  27S-815.  Lond.  1838.] 

The  Scandinavian  is  a  special  branch  of  the  common  German  mythology, 
but  its  general  character  was  more  fanciful  and  gloomy,  and  it  penetrated 
deeper  into  the  grotesque  and  monstrous  forms  of  nature.     Neither  the 
purely  historical  view  of  it,  according  to  which' Odhinn  was  a  mortal  king  or 
even  an  impostor,  nor  the  purely  symbolical,  according  to  which  the  doctrine 
of  the  Am  is  only  a  figurative  representation  of  the  origin,  the  redemption, 
and  the  regeneration  of  the  world,  corresponds  with  the  character  of  this 
people.    The  fact  that  the  worship  of  Odhinn  was  brought  to  the  North  by 
a  nomadic  tribe  from  the  Caucasus,  and  that  the  original  inhabitants  with 
their  gods  were  overcome,  is  clearly  indicated  in  the  tradition  that  the  Aser 
themselves  came  from  that  region,  and  maintained  a  perpetual  war  with  the 
conquered  race  of  giants  and  dwarfs.    The  world  was  created  by  Odhinn  out 
of  the  dead  body  of  the  giant  Ynicr  whom  he  had  slain,  a.  <?.,  out  of  the 
organic  powers  which  had  been  brought  into  subjection.    Creation  therefore 
commenced  with  a  murder,  and  a  bloody  feud  sprung  up  between  the  gods 
who  formed  the  world  and  the  race  of  the  giant  who  wished  to  revenge  his 
death.     OJhinn  is  in  nature  the  sun  which  gives  life  to  all  things,  and  in  his- 
tory he  is  royal  wisdom ;  Thor  is  the  god  of  thunder,  and  the  honest  but 
wild  prince  of  war ;  Freyr^  with  his  lovely  sister  Freyja,  represent  the  gene- 
rative and  conceptive  powers  of  nature.    Among  men  the  latter  represents 
love,  but  was  originally  different  from  Frigg^  the  beautiful  wife  of  Odhinn. 
In  the  popular  legends,  however,  all  these  gods  are  looked  upon  as  personal 
beings,  and  their  divine  life  and  adventures  while  warring  with  the  giants  and 
magicians,  is  a  picture  of  the  military  life  of  the  people  in  their  struggles 
with  the  powers  of  nature,  with  heroes,  and  with  enchanters.    Tlie  charac- 
ter of  the  goddesses  is  the  only  point  which  is  strange,  and  indicates  an 
Asiatic  origin ;  for  although  in  other  respects  they  well  represent  the  attrao- 
tions  of  the  German  women,  they  do  not  generally  exhibit  a  very  high 
regard  for  chastity.    The  gods  presided  over  the  fortunes  of  men ;  Odhinn 
was  the  bestower  of  victory,  of  fame,  and  of  the  power  of  song,  and  Freyja 
is  the  giver  of  the  pleasures  and  pains  of  love.    The  Nomas  descry,  weave, 
and  announce  the  destinies  of  heroes.    The  deceitful  and  the  cowardly  are 
tormented  in  Niflheim^  and  such  as  die  without  renown  wander  as  ghosts  in 
the  kingdom  of  Hela  ;  but  the  Valh/rias  hover  over  the  field  of  battle,  and 
select  their  favorite  heroes  for  the  slaughter.    Those  who  fall  glorioualj 
ascend  to  the  VaUialla^  where  they  continue  to  spend  a  life  of  heroic  activ- 
ity with  the  gods.    Thus  love,  death,  and  a  higher  life  were  united  in  the 
same  moment,  and  hence,  notwithstanding  their  joy  in  life,  their  delight  in 
a  heroes  death  was  always  great.    Sacrifices  were  offered  to  the  gods,  and  in 
circumstances  of  extremity  a  nation  once  offered  up  its  own  king.    Ordi- 
narily, however,  the  only  offerings  were  such  as  were  found  on  the  tables  of 
their  cheerful  feasts.    This  national  faith  knew  nothing  of  self-inflicted  tor- 
tures, but  a  gloomy  sadness  pervades  the  Edda,  since  pain  and  death  are  con- 
nected with  all  life,  and  spare  not  even  the  gods.    Indeed,  the  very  gods  are 
aware  of  a  prophecy  which  predicts  their  death.    Locke,  who  represents  the 


CHAP.  L    ESTAB.  OF  CHB.    $149.  EDDA-BELIOION.    $160.  ABIANI3M.        165 

aD-devoaring  fire  and  tlie  principle  of  evil  in  opposition  to  tbe  new  world  of 
the  gods,  contrives  to  intrude  himself  among  the  Aser.  Already,  by  his 
subtle  artifices,  Balder^  the  noblest  of  all  the  gods,  has  fallen.  By  stratagem 
and  power  the  Aser  are  yet  able  to  ward  off  their  own  destruction.  Bat  a 
time  is  coming  called  the  Twilight  of  the  gods,  when  all  the  powers  of  the 
abyss  will  break  their  bonds,  and  all  the  Aser  and  tbe  heroes  of  the  Val- 
balla  will  contend  against  them.  As  in  the  Niebelnngen  Noth,  all  the  gods, 
tiie  heroes,  and  the  powers  of  the  abyss  will  be  slain  together.  In  the 
mighty  death-struggle,  the  world  itself  will  become  a  confnsed  mass,  and  bo 
ooDsnmed  by  fire.  Then  a  new  earth  will  be  produced,  and  be  inhabited  by 
an  innocent  human  pair  nourished  by  the  morning  dew,  by  a  few  sons  of  the 
&llen  gods  who  will  survive  the  ruin,  and  by  Balder,  who  will  then  return 
from  the  lower  world.  They  will  spend  their  time  in  relating  to  each  other 
the  conflicts  of  the  former  world.  But  far  above  all  this  strife  and  change 
exists  an  unknown  power  which  has  been  called,  perhaps  from  some  hint 
taken  from  Christianity,  the  Universal  Father  (Alfadur). 

§  150.    Arianism, 

Near  the  close  of  the  fourth  century,  the  Western  provinces  of  the  Ro- 
DAn  empire,  partly  through  conquest  and  partly  through  the  increasing  influ- 
ence of  German  generals  and  mercenaries,  came  into  the  possession  of  the 
Germans.     This  people  then  had  either  become  Christian,  or  were  inclined 
to  be  so.     Tlie  Goths  had  received  the  gospel  by  means  of  prisoners  taken  in 
war,  and  a  Gothic  metropolitan  had  a  seat  in  the  Synod  of  Nicaea.    Among 
the  West  Gothic  princes,  Fritigern  was  fevorable  to  Christianity,  but  Athan- 
ttrich  persecuted  all  who  embraced  it.    When  the  Western  Goths  fled  before 
tbe  Huns,  and  sought  the  hospitality  of  the  Roman  empire  (376),  their  bap- 
tism was  the  condition  of  their  settlement  on  the  further  side  of  the  Dan- 
ube, (a)    The  form  of  Christianity  which  they  then  received  from  the  em- 
peror VaUns  was  Arian,  and  to  this  they  adhered  with  a  Gorman  fidelity, 
eten  when  another  creed  was  announced  to  them  by  imperial  edicts.    Their 
bishop,  Ulphilas^  by  natural  disposition  and  by  education  well  fitted  to  be  a 
mediator,  translated  the  Scriptures  into  their  native  language,  (h)  and  after 
performing  the  duties  of  his  office  for  forty  years,  died  at  Constantinople 
(588),  deeply  affected  on  account  of  the  subversion  of  his  faith,  (c)    But  in 
eoDBequence  of  the  victories  achieved  by  this  nation,  and  the  general  recep- 
tion of  bis  German  gospel,  the  other  German  conquerors  embraced  the 
Arian  faith.    It  was  carried  by  the  Western  Goths  into  Spain,  by  the  Fast- 
(r%  Goths  into  Italy,  and  by  the  Vandals  into  Africa.    The  greater  part  of 
4e  Burgundians^  after  a  brief  period  of  partial  sympathy  with  Catholicism, 


a)  J.  A^chJbaeK,  Oesch.  der  Wettgothen.  Frkf  1827. 

^)  VlpldUu  pArtiom  Inedit  Bpec  ed.  A.  Majut  et  CatitlUmeus^  Med.  1819.  4.  Cont  from  the 
^  cT  Pul :  1829.  1884  188S.  4  Ulfilas.  V.  et  N.  Test  vereionlB  goth.  fragmm.  edd.  C.  de  Gaht- 
'"k  at  /  Lo^bt^  Altenb.  et  Lpa.  1886-47.  9  Th.  4-^keirein8  Alvaftg^IjAns  Johannen,  brsg.  v. 
JI^MMum,  Mnnfch.  1S8S.  4  oomp.  Lo€h€^  Beitr.  z.  Textberleht  n.  Erkl.  d.  Skelreina.  Altenb. 
M-  [All  lo  Kitto't  Joanud  of  BlbL  Lit  vol  III.] 

Oi^wrat  IV.  9&    &«>i».VI.  87.     Tkfodoret,  lY,  9Si.    P/iilattorff.  11,  S.    Jomand.o.2^    Q 
^  ft.  Lab«D  n.  Lrtm  d.  Ult  lUn.  184a 


166     ANCIENT  CUUKCH  HISTOKY.  P£R.  IL  OEKMANIO  CHUBCH.  A.D.81»-«WL 

finally  followed  this  example.  Many,  however,  who  professed  to  be  Arians, 
were  only  Semiarians,  or  altogether  ignorant  of  the  diflference  between  the 
two.  (d)  The  Catholic  Church  to  which  the  native  Romans  belonged  re- 
mained unmolested,  for  the  German  kings  held  that  religion  coold  not  bo 
enforced  by  authority,  and  that  as  God  tolerated  various  forms  of  it,  no  par- 
ticular form  should  be  forced  upon  all  persons,  (e)  The  Vandal  kings  in 
Africa  (after  431)  were  the  only  sovereigns  who  by  a  violent  persecution 
gave  new  martyrs  and  mbracles  to  the  Catholic  Church,  (/)  and  thereby  pre- 
pared the  way  for  their  own  overthrow,  and  for  the  victories  of  Belisarius, 
by  whom  the  Roman  empire  was  once  more  established  there  (588). 

§  151.     Victory  of  Catholicism. 

GrtQor.  Tur.  H.  Franc  II,  27m.— JffeA«M',  H.  de  France  Par.  1888.  toL  L 

Clovis^  of  the  Merovingian  family,  united  the  Franks  under  one  monarchy, 
and  subdued  the  various  tribes  of  Gaul  and  of  the  provinces  on  the  confines  of 
Germany  (481-511).  His  Catliolic  wife  Clotilda,  a  Burgundian  princess, 
endeavored  to  turn  his  mind  from  the  gods  whom  his  fatliers  had  wor- 
8hi])ped.  In  the  battle  of  Z.ilpich  (Tolbiacum,  496)  against  the  Allemanni, 
when  he  saw  his  ranks  give  way,  he  raised  his  hands  in  supplication  to  the 
God  of  the  Christians.  After  his  baptism  on  Christmas  by  St.  Remigiui,  in 
the  Cathedral  at  Rheims,  the  victor  was  anointed  as  a  Christian  king,  (a)  and 
saluted  as  another  Constantine.  He  obtained  considerable  reputation  for  his 
military  exploits,  his  sanguinary  selfishness,  and  his  zeal  for  the  Catholic 
faith.  As  he  was  then  the  only  orthodox  king,  he  professed  to  feel  bound  in 
conscience  to  obtain  possession  of  the  beautiful  territories  of  the  Arian 
princes,  and  in  his  attempts  to  do  so,  he  received  much  assistance  from  their 
Catholic  subjects.  With  a  precipitate  faith  the  Franks  and  AUemanni  fol- 
lowed the  example  of  their  victorious  monarch.  In  consequence  of  the  suc- 
cess of  the  Franks,  and  the  mental  superiority  of  the  native  Catholic  inhab- 
itants, Arianism  began  to  decline,  and  in  the  eighth  century,  when  the 
Longobard  kingdom  (6)  was  overthrown,  its  independence  as  a  national  reli- 
gion was  entirely  lost. 

§  152.    British  and  Anglo-Saxon  Church, 

I.  Wilkin*^  Concilia  Brit  et  Ulbem.  Lond.  1787.  4  volt,  fl    Btda  Ven,  H.  ecc 

II.  Usaerii  Britannicar.  Ecd.  antlquitt  (Dabl.  1G89.  4.)  Lond.  1GS7.  C  Lingard,  Antiqaltiea  of 
the  Anglo-Saxon  Charch.  Newcaatlc.  1806.  8  vols.  Stditdlin^  KOeflch.  r.  Oroasbrit  Oott  1319L  S 
vols.  J.  Lttnigan,  Eccl.  Utot  of  Ireland.  Dubl.  ed.  2. 1829.  8  vola.  Munter,  di«  altbrit  K.  (Stud.  v. 
Krit  ISdd.  P.  Isl)  K.  Schrofdl,  d.  1.  Jobrb.  d.  engl.  K.  Pass.  1840.  [StiUina/UMy  Orig.  Britaimicaeu 
>vitb  notes  b7  Pauiin,  Oxon.  1842.  2  vols.  &  G.  Smithy  Keliglon  of  Anc  Britain,  biatorlcaDy  con- 
sidcrod.  Lond.  2  ed.  8.    //  Soames,  The  Anglo-Saxon  Church,  its  hist  Ac  Lond.  8  ed.  8.     Wm. 


d)  Th^odoreU  II.  ecc.  lY,  8&  Procop.  Hist  Goth.  c.  4. 

e)  Cassiodor.  variar.  1.  II.  Ep.  27.  L  X.  Ep.  2<l 

/)  Victor,  Episc.  Vitensb  (4<ii7),  IliAt  perseontionis  AfH&  (BuinarU  Hist  peraeoationis  Tan- 
dalicae.  Par.  1694.  Yen.  1782.  ^)—Papencordt,  Oeech.  d.  Yand.  Herrsch.  in  Afr.  BrL  1887. 

a)  Tlio  popular  account :  JTincmar,  Vita  S.  Bemigii  c  8.— (7.  O,  «.  Mwr^  d.  b.  AmpoU*  iq 
Bheiou^  NQrnb.  1801. 

h)  Koch-SUrnbtrg^  Reich,  d.  Longobarden.  M&ncb.  1S80. 


CHAP.  L    ESTAB.  OF  CHB.    $  152.  BRITISH  A  ANGLO-SAXON  CHUBOHES.      167 

JKkIm,  Origin  of  fh6  Prim.  Gharch  of  the  Brit  Isles.  Lond.  8.  F.  Thackeray^  Besearrhee  Into 
tbe  Eod.  «nd  Polit  SUte  of  Anc  Brit  Lend.  184a  2  Tola.  &  &  Turner^  U.  of  the  Anglo-Sazona 
5  ed.  S  To]&  &  Lond.  16S&  F.  Palgravf,  H.  of  the  Anglo-SaxonA.  Lond.  1S8T.  12.  ArMr.  and 
JW.  Ckr.  Union,  vol  IL  (1851.)  p.  8668.  71a&  LitUlTs  Bel.  Mag.  vol  III.  (1829.)  p.  815es.  C.  An- 
itfot^  Hist  Sketches  of  the  Ancient  Irish.  Edlnb.  1828.  8.] 

The  Church  in  Ireland  was  founded  (after  430)  by  Patrick,  a  Briton,  who 
labored  there  with  the  zeal.of  a  sincere  and  recent  convert,  and  with  the 
power  of  one  who  was  believed  not  only  by  others  bnt  by  himself  to  work 
miracles,  (a)  The  convents  he  established  were,  until  some  time  in  the  sev- 
enth century,  the  centres  of  a  fervent  ecclesiastical  activity  for  the  island, 
and  Ireland  was  called  the  Isle  of  Saints.  From  it  proceeded  Columha  (after 
665),  by  whom  the  Picts  in  the  Highlands  of  Scotland  were  brought  over  to 
the  Christian  faith.  Adopting  some  remnants  of  Druidical  customs,  he 
established  on  the  island  of  Ily  (St.  Jona)  a  sacerdotal  order,  to  which,  in 
various  records  after  the  ninth  century  the  name  of  CuMees  (Kele-Dc)  was 
probably  exdudvely  applied,  (b)  The  bishops  of  the  surrounding  country 
tdmowledged  this  presbyter-abbot  as  their  superior,  {c)  Britain  is  men- 
tioned as  a  Christian  country  in  the  fourth  century.  But  when  the  Anglo- 
Saxons^  who  had  been  invited  to  enter  it  as  allies  (after  449),  became  its  con- 
qoerors,  the  British  Church  continued  only  in  Wales  and  in  the  mountains 
of  Northumberland.  The  national  hatred  of  the  tribes  was  too  intense  to 
dlow  the  Saxons  to  receive  the  gospel  from  the  Britons.  Gregory  the  Great^ 
who  for  a  long  time  took  a  deep  interest  in  this  people,  availed  himself  of 
the  marriage  of  Ethelbert^  king  of  Kent,  with  a  Prankish  princess,  to  send  a 
solemn  embassy  of  forty  Benedictines  to  proclaim  himself  and  Christ  among 
the  Anglo-Saxons.  The  king  was  baptized,  and  Augustine^  the  principal  per- 
Km  belonging  to  the  embassy,  was  appointed  Archbishop  of  Canterbury 
(597).  From  Kent,  Roman  Catholicism  was  propagated,  in  spite  of  many 
rieisntades  during  the  succeeding  century,  among  the  other  Saxon  kingdoms, 
more  by  covert  concessions  and  gradual  changes  than  by  an  open  conflict 
with  heathenism.  For  Gregory  had  instructed  those  whom  he  had  sent  not 
to  destroy  the  temples  of  the  gods,  but  to  consecrate  them  to  the  true  Deity ; 
to  allow  the  people  to  bring  the  oxen  which  they  had  been  accustomed  to 
sacrifice  at  their  heathen  festivals,  and  on  days  devoted  to  the  dedication  of 
a  church,  or  to  the  commemoration  of  some  saint,  to  slay  them  in  honor  of 
flie  true  God,  and  to  hold  joyful  feasts  for  them  under  green  arbors  near  the 
ehnrches.  By  retaining  such  customary  pleasures,  he  hoped  gradually  to 
make  these  obstinate  dispositions  form  a  relish  for  the  spiritual  enjoyments 
of  Christianity,  {d)  It  soon  became  evident,  however,  from  the  eftbrts  to 
unite  the  Saxon  and  British  churches,  that  the  latter  would  acknowledge  no 
other  subjection  to  the  Roman  bishop  than  that  which  was  due  to  any  other 
Christian,  (e)    But  they  tolerated  each  other  with  greater  or  less  degrees  of 


a)  Pairicii  Contemio.  (Opuscc.  ed.  Wdraetu^  Lond.  1858.  and  In  W.  BeViam^  Irish  Antiquarian 
Bottrcbes.  DnbL  18268i  P.  IL  App.  p.  49.)  Popular  accounts:  Jocelini  (12th  cent)  Vita  B.  Patric. 
(Adi9S.  Mart.  roL  IL  p.  640.)    [Amer.  and  Far.  Chr.  Union,  vol.  L  (1S50.)  p.  4S9!v\  585sa.] 

h)  Ja^  Smith,  Life  of  St  Col  Edlnb.  1798.— t/I  Jamiemn,  Illst  Account  of  tbe  Anc.  Culdees  of 
^fltt.  Edinb.  181L  i.—J.  O.  J.  Branny  de  Cnldeia  Bonn.  1840.  4      c)  Beda^  IL  ecc.  Ill,  4. 

tf)  Grsffor.  Ep.  id  Mellitum.  (0pp.  toL  IL  p.  11T6«.  and  Becla  I,  30.) 

«)  WOHns,  Cone  toL  I.  p.  M.    Beda,  Hist,  ecc  II,  2. 


168     ANCIENT  CHUKCH  HIBTOBT.  FEB.  IL  OEBMANIC  CHUSCn.  A.  D.  81t-80a 

hostility  nntil  the  final  nnion  of  the  two  nations,  when  the  Ohorch  of  the 
most  numerous  people  gained  the  victory. 

§  168.    Irruption  of  Islam  in  the  West. 

J,  Atchbach,  Oesch.  d.  OmmaUaden  In  Spanicn.  Frkf.  ISSOa.  [Piucual  cU  Gayangot^  H.  of  tb« 
Mohammedan  Dynasties  in  Spain,  from  the  text  of  Al  Makkari,  Lond.  1840-48.  %  vols.  I.  J,  C 
Murphyy  II.  of  the  Moh.  Empire  in  Spain,  Lond.  1816.  4] 

In  consequence  of  a  dispute  ahout  the  succession  to  the  throne,  Spain  was 
opened  to  the  Arabians,  the  conquerors  of  Africa.  The  kingdom  of  tlie  West- 
em  Goths  was  speedily  overthrown  by  J/t/«a,  the  general  of  the  Caliphate,  and 
Spain  was  subjected  to  the  Arabian  prophet  (711).  Through  this  country 
Abderrhaman  was  preparing  to  pass  for  the  conquest  of  the  entire  West, 
that  he  might  unite  it  with  his  Eastern  empire.  He  had  already  obtained 
possession  of  France  as  far  as  the  Loire,  when  the  power  of  the  Arabians  on 
the  north  of  the  Pyrenees  was  broken  for  ever,  by  Charles  Martely  at  the 
battle  of  Poictiers  (782).  In  Spain  the  Christians  received  toleration  from 
the  Arabians  (Mozarabes)  as  a  distinct  sect,  and  from  their  mountains  in  the 
North  commenced  against  the  Arabian  government  a  chivalrous  contest  for 
their  national  independence  and  for  Christianity. 

§  164.     Germany,    Boni facias^  680-765. 

I.  BonifacH:  EplstoUc,  ed.  Whrdtu>ein,  Mog.  17S9.  t  Vita,  scr.  Willibald  about  760.  (PerCi, 
Th.  II.  p.  881.) 

II.  OtfihnuM  (about  1066),  YIU  S.  Bon.  (AcU  SS.  Jnn.  Tb.  I.  p.  452.)  Serarius,  Mofrantlaft 
rerum  ].  V.  Mofi;.  CiM.  4.  ed.  Johannes,  Fret  1722.  t  Th.  L  Sttgittarius^  Antlquitt  gontiliamlet 
chriKtianijimi  ThuringicL  Jen.  1685.  4.  Oudenii,  Da.  de  Bon.  Ilclmst  1720.  4  LoJUr,  Bon.  Qotha. 
1812.    Suiters,  Bon.  Mainz.  1845. 

Bishoprics  had  been  established  during  the  fourth  century  in  Germany, 
along  the  Rliine  and  the  Danube,  as  far  as  the  Roman  dominion  extended, 
but  in  the  fifth,  Christianity  was  partially  driven  back  by  the  national  mi- 
grations. Under  the  influence  of  the  Franks  in  the  beginning  of  the  eighth 
century,  it  pressed  forward  as  far  as  the  Saale  and  the  Elbe,  but  it  was  under 
no  ecclesiastical  regulations,  and  was  much  corrupted  by  paganism.  The 
gospel  was  also  carried  by  British  monks  as  far  as  the  Main  and  among  the 
Allcmanni,  but  had  no  connection  with  Rome.  Thus  Columban  (d.  616), 
who  had  been  driven  from  the  Yosgcs  as  far  as  the  Apennines,  established 
some  convents  as  seminaries  of  Christianity,  and  his  disciple  Gall  (d.  about 
660),  who  had  been  left  at  the  lake  of  Constance,  and  had  become  a  hermit 
on  the  Steinach,  made  a  lasting  and  beneficial  impression  on  the  minds  of  the 
people,  by  destroying  their  idols,  by  casting  out  demons  in  a  remarkable 
manner,  and  by  refusing  to  accept  the  bishopric  of  Constance,  (a)  But  Wii^ 
fred^  an  Anglo-Saxon  monk,  originally  from  Kirton  in  Devonshire,  better 
known  by  his  Roman  name  of  Boni/a^^e^  was  sent  from  Rome  to  undertake 
the  conversion  of  Germany  (718),  and  finally  became  the  apostle  of  the  Ger^ 

a)  I.  YiU  S.  Cohimbani  by  hia  pupil  Jonas,  Yita  S.  Oalli  hj  WalqfHd  Stralo  in  MahOoii 
AcU  Ord.  S.  Betied.  8aec  II.  p.  1.  228.  The  older  sources  of  the  laUer  in  PerU,  Th.  L  p.  1.— C  J 
UefeU,  Gesch.  d.  EinfTilir.  d.  Clirifttenth.  im  sQdwcetl.  Dcutechl.  TQb.  1S87.  O,  (X  KnotUnb^  di 
Columbano.  Lugd.  lSd9.    F.  O.  Rtttlmv,  Obaa.  ad  vltam  8.  Galli  spectantea.  Mart).  1841  4. 


CnAP.  L    BSTAB.OFCHB.    $  154.  BONIFACE.    $109.  SAXONS.  169 

mans.  This  title,  however,  belongs  to  him  not  so  mnch  becanse  he  first  pro- 
daimed  the  gospel  to  the  people,  as  becanse  lie  effected  the  complete  over- 
throw of  paganism,  announced  by  the  destraction  of  the  sacred  oak  at  Gels- 
mar,  (b)  and  because  he  was  the  founder  of  the  German  Chnrch.  He  was 
Buperatitioos  in  his  views,  rigid  in  his  habits,  narrow-minded  with  respect  to 
external  forms,  and  arrogant  towards  inferiors,,  but  Bubmlssive  to  popes, 
except  when  he  thought  they  protected  abuses,  (c)  In  conformity  with  his 
oath,  (d)  he  made  the  German  Church  dependent  upon  the  pope,  but  with- 
•at  the  authority  of  the  Roman  bishop  and  of  the  Frankish  monarch,  he 
would  have  found  the  enforcement  of  his  strict  rules  in  opposition  to  the 
general  resistance  almost  impossible.  In  consequence  of  the  plenary  powers 
given  him  by  the  Roman  see,  he  was  looked  upon  (after  732)  as  the  general 
bishop  of  Germany,  and  by  a  decree  of  the  Grerman  diet  (747),  the  old  epis- 
eopal  city  of  Mentz  was  given  him  as  a  permanent  see.  When  too  old  to 
ptfform  the  duties  of  ecclesiastical  government,  he  requested  that  his  disci- 
ple LuUuM  might  be  appointed  his  successor,  and  resumed  a  task  which  had 
been  unsuccessful  in  his  youth — the  conversion  of  the  Frieslanders.  His 
tent  was  pitched  on  the  bank  of  the  Borne,  when  he  was  suddenly  attacked 
by  a  band  of  heathen  robbers.  He  allowed  his  followers  to  moke  no  resist- 
ance, and  all  were  slain.  His  body,  in  compliance  with  his  last  will,  was 
buried  in  his  favorite  convent  of  Fulda. 

§  156.     Th4i  Saxons. 

Xelnd4r§^  Tr.  de  sUta  rel.  et  relp.  snb  Carolo  M.  et  Lud.  P.  Id  Sax.  Lemira  1711.  4.  Juaf.  Jfoe9sr, 
Ouubr.  Gesch.  BrL  1780.  vol  I.  Funk,  &.  d  Unterwerfung  d.  Sachsen  anter  K.  d.  O.  (Scl)lomer*s 
Affh.  t  Ooch.  VL  Lit  1888.  vol.  IV.  p.  2988flL)  O.  Zimmtrmann^  da  matata  Saxonam  vetenim  reL 
Dmit  1S39.  4  P.  L    Oaanam  ($  14S.) 

• 

The  Saxons  defended  their  national  independence  and  the  religion  of  their 
ancestors  (after  772)  against  the  butcher  Charles,  {a)  until  a  series  of  battles 
and  violated  treaties  made  them  desperate,  and  they  finally  resolved  (804) 
to  unite  with  the  Franks  as  one  nation  and  pay  tithes.  The  Westphalian 
bishoprics  were  erected  to  servo  as  a  kind  of  ecclesiastical  fortresses.  Laws 
^tten  in  blood  forbade  all  return  to  the  customs  of  heathenism,  {h)  and  it 
▼as  Dot  until  the  Saxons  had  been  completely  subdued  by  the  sword  and  the 
croM,  that  Charles  the  Great  saw  his  plans  accomplished. 

§  156.     Overthrow  of  German  Paganism, 

Iff  Hdurl^  Gcaeh.  d.  dentacb.  BUdung  In  d.  Per.  d.  Uebergangcs  ITeldenth.  in  Chr.  BitI  ISM.  12.] 

Aa  the  Germans  were  in  the  habit  of  acknowledging  gods  besides  their 
^"^  they  readily  conceded  to  their  guests  that  Christ  might  be  divine.  But 
iltboQgfa  the  doctrine  of  a  crucified  God  was  not  altogether  strange  to  their 


*)  PMk,  Th.  IL  p.  848.      <i)  WUrdtw.  p.  108. 

tf)  ITknttw.  Pl  ISiL    [Tb6  oath  Itaelf :  OUuUr,  niat  vol  IL  ^  214  at  a] 
<)  Mibd«f  Uneertain  as  an  orlg.  doc  but  often  printed  from  the  Goslar  Archives,  e.  g.  HannOr* 
>l>»P.Slp4Sa. 
i)  CkpUolatlo  de  partlb.  Bazonlae.  il  789.    {Walisr,  Corpus  juris  Qerin.  Th.  IL  p.  lOlsa.  with 
ta  MHndm%  p,  28aa.) 


1 70     ANCIENT  CnUBCH  HISTORY.  PER.  XL  GERMANIC  CHURCH.  A.  D.  8U-80a 

minds,  Christ,  his  apostles,  and  the  monks,  seemed  to  them  a  faint-hearted 
kind  of  people,  until  the  clergy  acquired  military  hahits  and  legends  of  chi- 
valrous saints  were  circulated  among  them.  The  bold  assumption  of  supe- 
riority to  the  gods  of  their  country,  and  the  exclusive  reliance  upon  their  own 
power,  which  the  northern  heroes  especially  expressed  without  hesitation  or 
reproof,  was  not  directly  favorable  to  Christianity,  but  proved  that  a  living 
faith  in  the  old  religion  was  already  much  impaired.  They  had  no  powerM 
sacerdotal  caste,  and  the  opposition  which  Christianity  encountered  was  not 
produced  by  a  priestly  nobility  among  any  of  Odhinn's  worshippers,  but  by 
the  various  political  circumstances  in  which  it  was  introduced  to  the  several 
tribes,  (a)  The  religion  of  their  ancestors  had  no  support  but  the  public  sen- 
timent of  a  free  people.  For  the  whole  intellectual  fabric  of  the  Roman  em* 
piro,  and  consequently  for  its  church,  they  entertained  the  profoundest  reve- 
rence. They  were  convinced  by  the  example  of  the  Western  Goths  that 
the  Christians'  God  could  bestow  power  and  victory.  The  twilight  of  the 
gods  which  their  mythology  taught  them  to  expect,  seemed  to  them  realieed 
by  Christianity,  but  in  a  milder  and  more  beautiful  form.  Christianity  was 
always  foreign  to  the  Greek  and  Roman  national  character,  and  could  never 
be  received  by  those  nations  without  destroying  their  peculiar  spirit.  The 
disposition  of  the  German  nation  on  the  other  hand  never  found  its  proper 
development  except  in  connection  with  Christianity.  Hence,  wherever  the 
Germans  were  independent  or  victorious  the  gospel  always  had  free  scope. 
But  it  was  not  without  many  touching  lamentations  that  the  ancient  system 
of  paganism  was  renounced,  (h) 


CHAP.  II.— SOCIAL  CONSTITUTION  OF  THE  CHURCH. 

Planck^  Gesch.  d.  kIrchL  GeflellacbaftsrerC  vol  II.  Sichhom,  dentache  Staate-n.  Recbtsgeich.  5  ed. 
Gott  1848.  vol.  L  J.  Grimjn^  doutscbe  Recbtsaltherth&nier.  Gdtt  1828.  mUlmann^  Unpr.  d.  KVer£ 
d.  MA.  Bonn.  \^\.Sllendor/,  d.  Karolinger  u.  d.  Hierarchie  Ibrer  Zeit  Easen  1689. 

§  1 67.  Original  Records  of  the  Canon  Law. 

By  the  principles  of  the  German  law,  the  Church  and  all  ecclesiastics  re- 
tained the  same  privileges  as  they  had  enjoyed  under  the  Roman  empire,  (a) 
and  in  consequence  of  the  new  relations  in  which  these  were  possessed,  a  new 
legal  state  was  developed.  The  Spanish  collection  and  the  Dionysian  Codex 
were  therefore  continually  appealed  to  as  records  af  the  Roman  law.  Any 
new  ecclesiastical  usages  and  laws  were  either  incorporated  with  the  popular 
code  or  published  as  decrees  of  synods  or  of  the  diet,  (b) 


a)  On  the  other  hand :  Leo^  Geacb.  d.  ital  Staaten.  Hmb.  1829.  vol  L  p.  559a. 
h)  Grimm.  MythoL  p.  4.     Uhland,  Thor.  p.  228. 

a)  Cane  Aurtlian,  L  a.  611.  can.  1.  {ManH  Tb.  TIIL  p.  8608.)  Lea  RipuaHor.  tU.  6S.  &  1. 
{Walter Tluh  p.  ISO.) 

b)  Walter,  Corpus  Juris  Germ,  antiqoi.  Ber.  182488.  8  Tb.  PertM,  Monum.  Germ.  Tb.  IIIi.  L«- 
gnm  Tb.  I.  II.  Comp.  Regesta  Carolonun.  All  the  orlg.  dooe.  of  the  Caitdingiaii  kings  In  the  Eztnets 
(762-918)  by  Boehmer,  Frk£  1884  4 


CHAP.  U.    ECCLES.  LAW.    ilBS.  GHUBCII  A  STATE.    {159.  PROPEBTT.        171 

§  158.    Relation  of  the  Church  to  the  State. 

Bunda^  r.  Unpr.  d.  Beicbastandfloh.  d.  Bisob.  n.  Aebte.  Oott:  1774.  4    «.  Both^  v.  d.  Einflosse  d. 
Gtbdkhlc.  unter  d.  Iferowingern.  NQrnb.  1830.  4. 

The  bisbope,  wbo  were  equally  respected  by  tbe  conquering  and  tbe  con- 
quered nations,  were  generally  employed  as  mediators  wben  terms  of  peace 
were  to  be  settled.  No  sooner  bad  the  kings,  wbo  were  originally  merely  tbe 
leaders  of  tbeir  companions  in  arms,  tasted  the  sweets  of  regal  power  as  en- 
joyed under  tbe  Roman  law,  ^an  they  became  anxious  to  attach  the  bishops 
to  tbeir  interests.  By  conferring  upon  them  offices  at  court  and  certain  feu- 
dal estates,  an  ecclesiastical  vassalage  was  created  (a)  which  made  it  their 
policy  to  restrain  any  conquering  hordes,  or  to  conciliate  any  conquered 
tribes.  Tbe  power  of  tbe  kings  over  the  Church,  or  of  the  bishops  over  the 
state,  may  be  inferred  from  the  feudal  laws  gradually  developed  during  the 
conquest.  Tbe  kings  either  directly  appointed  the  bishops,  or  nominated 
those  whom  they  wished  to  be  chosen  by  the  clergy  or  the  people ;  (h)  but 
the  bishops  themselves,  along  with  the  other  great  vassals,  either  elected  the 
king  or  confirmed  bis  hereditary  successor,  (c)  The  bishops  were  required 
to  swear  fealty  to  the  king  and  to  seek  justice  before  tbe  royal  court,  but  they 
could  be  judged  only  by  their  peers,  (d)  Whoever  felt  aggrieved  by  any  pro- 
ceedings in  a  spiritual  court  could  apply  for  redress,  or  at  least  for  grace,  from 
the  king  as  his  lord  paramount.  («)  Bishops  sat  in  the  diet  with  all  other 
crown  vassals,  and  it  was  on  this  ground  that  after  the  seventh  century  eccle- 
nsstical  causes  were  so  much  mingled  with  civil  affiiirs  in  the  transactions  of 
that  iMxly.  (/)  Subsequently  the  power  of  legislation  resided  in  the  states  and  in 
tbe  king.  (</)  By  such  a  system  the  Church  seemed  almost  blended  with  the 
itate,  but  its  power  and  its  consequent  independence  was  well  represented  by 
that  hierarchical  aristocracy  whose  authority  the  kings  always  found  it  best 
to  maintain,  as  a  counterpoise  to  that  of  an  hereditary  and  military  nobility. 

§  169.    Property  of  the  Church  and  the  Clergy. 

Many  bishops  and  abbots  received  royal  grants  of  land  and  of  people.  These 
eodesiastical  possessions,  like  all  other  royal  fie&,  had  immunities  and  juris- 
dictions of  their  own.  They  were  only  bound  to  furnish  a  cerUun  quota  of 
men  for  a  general  war  (the  lleerbann),  and  the  counts  exercised  jurisdiction 
in  cases  of  life  and  death.  The  divine  institution  of  tithes  was  more  zealously 
I^rodaimed  than  the  gospel  itself,  and  under  Charles  tbe  Great,  wbo  paid 


a)  FrtfUgarii  Cbron.  c  41.  78.  SangaUemi.  I,  la  (P«rto  Th.  II.  p.  78S.) 

&)  Cone,  AureL  V.  a.  M9,  can.  10.  Cone.  ToUtan,  XIL  a  681.  can.  6.  Altboogh  Cone  Paris.  Y. 
1  n&  can.  1.  jet  ooznpL  Walter  Th.  II.  p.  18. 

c)  OfRc.  Tol€taiu  VIII.  a.  65-3.  can.  10.  WUkiiu  Cone.  Brit  vol  L  p.  14Ss.  liespecUng  France: 
Piandt,  ToL  II-  p.  44&W. 

tf)  Grtg,  Tur.  II.  Franc  Y,  19.  29.  Cone.  AquUgr,  a.  789.  c.  87.    {Walter  Th.  IL  p.  84) 

«)  Cone.  I*(tris.  V.  a.  615.  can.  8.  [Landonj  Paria.  p.  461.]  with  Clotaire*s  enlarged  confirmation* 
{Walter  Th.  II.  p.  U)    CapiL  Franco/,  a.  794.  c  1    (  Walter  Th.  IL  p.  116.) 

/)  E«ttction  in  Spain :  Omc.  ToM.  XVII.  a.  694.  o.  1.  {Manei  Th.  XIL  pi  196.)  Courts  in 
Fnaee:  Hlnemar.  de  ord.  palatii  c  29.  comp.  Manai  Th.  XIY.  p^  64. 

9)  Cone  Arvernenee  a.  585.  Pfa«l!&tio,  (JfaiMi  Th.  YIIL  p.  859.)  Cone.  Aurd.  L  £p.  ad  Clo- 
d9T.  {ManH  Tb.  YIIL  p.  850.) 


1 72     ANCIENT  CHURCH  HISTORY.  PER.  IL  GERMANIC  CHURCH.  A.  D.  SlS-Ml 

tithes  of  all  his  possessions,  it  heoame  the  general  law  for  the  whole  Frankish 
empire,  (a)  It  was,  however,  much  easier  for  the  Church  to  acquire  immense 
wealth  from  the  scruples  of  the  people  than  to  defend  it  against  the  universal 
robherj  and  violence  which  then  prevailed.  Chilperic  complained  that  the 
wealth  of  the  kings  had  fallen  into  the  hands  of  the  Church,  (b)  but  Charlet 
Mattel  distributed  the  ecclesiastical  wealth  among  his  soldiers,  and  left  to  the 
Church  the  consolation  of  thinking  that  the  deliverer  of  Christendom  had 
gone  down  to  hell,  (e)  The  dergj  preserved  their  privilege  of  being  Judged 
in  civil  causes  only  before  the  bishop^s  court ;  ffiough  in  criminal  cases,  if  the 
offence  was  proved,  they  might  be  arraigned  in  what  was  called  a  mixed 
court.  Between  the  counts  and  the  bishops  of  each  district  (Gau)  sprung  up 
mutual  jealousies  and  encroachments,  which  the  kings  often  found  it  easy  to 
increase.  The  rights  of  the  ipetropolitans  were  on  various  occasions  con- 
firmed, but  they  could  not  be  sustained  in  opposition  to  the  political  power 
of  individual  bishops. 

§  160.    Ecclmastieal  Power  of  the  Pope. 

The  authority  of  the  pope  in  countries  beyond  the  Alps  had  its  origin  in 
the  necessity  which  the  Catholics  and  Romans  felt  of  a  general  centre  of 
onion  in  their  conflicts  with  the  Arians  and  Barbarians.  The  legates  of 
Gregory  the  Great  were  therefore  called  upon  to  exercise  supreme  jurisdic- 
tion in  Spain,  But  when  the  Western  Goths  went  over  to  the  Catholio 
party  that  necessity  was  no  longer  felt,  and  the  bishops,  becoming  conscious 
of  their  political  importance,  freely  opposed  the  papal  claims.  Witiza 
(701-10),  who  was  anxious  to  recover  the  royal  prerogatives  from  the  no- 
bility and  the  Church,  went  so  far  as  to  forbid  all  appeals  to  the  Roman 
bishop,  (a)  But  the  overthrow  of  his  throne  and  the  subversion  of  the 
Gothic  kingdom  was  generally  regarded  as  a  divine  judgment  on  the  impious 
attempt.  The  Anglo-Saxon  Church  gradually  prevailed  upon  the  neighbor- 
ing churches  to  place  themselves  under  the  guardianship  of  Rome,  for  the 
people  seemed  to  think  it  rather  hazardous  to  prefer  Columba  to  Peter,  when 
the  latter  held  the  keys  of  heaven,  (ft)  The  pope  was  regarded  with  the 
highest  veneration  among  the  Franks^  but  his  power  was  conflned  to  remon- 
strances and  intercessions  except  when  the  kings  found  it  for  their  interest  to 
make  it  appear  greater,  (e)  But  when  Pipin  grasped  after  the  imperial 
authority,  he  knew  of  no  better  way  to  silence  the  scruples  of  the  Franks 
respecting  the  oath  which  they  had  sworn  to  their  legitimate  king,  than  to 
obtain  a  declaration  from  Pope  Zacharias  that  whoever  possessed  the  power 
should  have  also  the  name  of  the  king  (750).  (d)    From  that  time  all  the 

a)  CftpU.  Franco/,  a.  TM.  c  28.    (  WalUr  Th.  IL  p.  lia) 
V)  Gregor.  Tur.  H.  Franc  VI,  46. 

c)  Bonif.  Ep.  72.  {WUrdtw.  p.  194.)  JTlncmar.  Rem.  ad  Lndov.  German.  (TTottw, Th.  ni.]x85.) 
a)  SehoUi  lIUp.  Ulnrtrata.  FrcC  1608.  f.  Th.  IL  p.  62.  Th.  IV.  p.  69. 

h)  Beda,  II.  ooc.  Ill,  25. 

o)  Ortg.  Tur.  H.  Franc  V,  21.  cC  VII,  89. 

d)  Fredeg.  Chron.  appendix.  {BovquHTh.  II.  p.  460.  comp.  Th.  V.  p.  9.)  AnnaL  Laurim.  ad 
a.  749.  {Perta  Th.  L  p.  186.)— «/:  O.  LoeheU^  de  CAQsia  regni  Francor.  a  MeroYlngis  ad  CaroUngot 
translatL  Bou.  18U  4. 


CHAP.il    ECCLES.LAW.    fieaCLEBOT.    iUL  TAP AL  TOWER.  173 

Garolingians  thought  it  host  to  exalt  the  dignity  of  those  on  whom  the  law- 
fnlness  and  sacredness  of  their  own  crown  depended.  The  German  Church 
was  from  its  very  origin  in  a  state  of  dependence  upon  Rome,  and  in  its  first 
eynod  (743)  all  its  hishops  swore  ohedience  to  the  pope,  (e)  Boniface  endea- 
vored to  bring  the  Oallican  Church  under  the  same  regulation,  hut  as  its 
bishops  possessed  not  much  zeal  for  the  general  Ohurch  and  great  political 
power,  his  success  was  by  no  means  complete.  Great  efforts  were  made  to 
convince  the  metropolitans  that  the  pallium  was  indispensable  to  the  com- 
pleteness of  their  power.  But  when  Boniface  complained  that  it  was  con- 
ferred at  Rome  for  money,  Zacharias  called  it  a  calumny  to  say  that  the  Ro- 
man see  would  sell  what  had  been  bestowed  upon  it  as  a  gift  by  the  Holy 
Ghost.  (/) 

§  161.    Secular  Power  of  the  Pope. 

Codex  Carolinut.  {Cenni^  Monn.  domlnatlonis  roDtlficiac.  Bom.  ITGOsi  2  Th.  4.)— II.  Orti  dell* 
crifine  del  dominio  e  della  8overaDlt&  degll  rom.  Pont  Bom.  1754.  SabbathUr^BnrYoiif^ne  do  la  puia- 
MMe  temporelle  dea  Papea.  Ilaye.  1765.  J.  R.  Becker ^  &.  d.  Zeitp.  der  VerfiDdr.  in  der  Oberh.  &.  Bom* 
]M.  17€9.    Compi  J.  v.  MaUer,  Werke.  188&  Th.  20. 

As  late  as  the  middle  of  the  eighth  century  a  governor  was  placed  by  the 
emperor  over  the  exarchate  and  the  city  of  Rome.    But  in  the  latter  the 
ictual  power  was  in  the  hands  of  the  pope  as  the  head  of  an  aristocratic  mu- 
nicipal government.    The  Longobards  conquered  the  exarchate  and  threat- 
ened an  attack  upon  Rome.    In  vain  was  protection  sought  from  Constanti- 
nople, and  Stephen  IL  in  the  name  of  St.  Peter  culled  upon  the  King  of  the 
Franks,  whom  he  had  anointed,  for  aid.    In  two  campaigns  (754-5)  Pipin 
repelled  the  Longobards,  and  as  the  Roman  Patricius  he  committed  to  the 
pope  the  provinces  which  the  exarch  had  governed,  (a)  alleging  that  the 
Franks  had  shed  their  blood  not  for  the  Greeks  but  for  St.  Peter,  and  for  the 
good  of  their  own  souls.    Charles  the  Great  having  by  systematic  measures  de- 
stroyed the  kingdom  of  the  Longobards  (after  778),  confirmed  and  enlarged 
the  donation  which  his  father  had  made,  and  on  Pec.  25,  800,  laid  the  deed 
▼hich  secured  the  whole  on  the  tomb  of  the  apostles.    By  this  means  the 
Ung  effected  his  purpose,  which  was  to  gain  a  powerful  ally  in  Italy,  and  the 
pope  became  a  ruler  over  a  considerable  territory  and  its  inhabitants.    Ho 
▼as  however  obliged  to  acknowledge  a  lord  paramount  with  indefinite 
powers  above  himself,  (h)  and  was  so  much  harassed  by  the  factious  strifes 
of  the  more  i>owerful  families,  that  he  became  continually  dependent  upon 
the  protection  of  the  King  of  the  Franks. 

§  162.     Charles  the  Great.    768-814. 

I  Aonala,  Capitularies  (before  $  147)  &  Letteia  in  the  Codex  CarolInoBL  Elnhard^  Tita  KarolL 
{.hru  Th.  IL  pi  42d.  4(  Ilan.  1880.  0pp.  ed.  A.  Teulet,  Tar.  lS40-a  2  Th.)  Leben  a.  Wandel  Karls 
^  0.  T.  Eiohard.  EinL  Urscbr.  ErluoL  Urkondensamml  s.  J.  L.  Ideler.  Hamb.  1889.  Manachtie 
SngaUeHtU,  (Anecdotes)  degeatis  Karoli  {PerU  Th.  IL  p.  726.)    Poetae  Saxoni^  AnnaL  de  gcbtls 


«)  Boni/:  EpL  78.    (  Witrdtw.  p.  179.)      /)  Zaeh,  ad  BoniC    (  WUrdhe.  p.  148&) 
a)  ShrpA.  ad.  Pip.  a.  7ML    (C^n^Th.  L  p.70.)       b)  Sinhard,  Ann.  k  796. 


174     ANCIENT  CnUBClI  IIISTORT.  PER  IL  OEBMANIC  CHUECU.  A.  D.  81»-80a 

Oar.  (Mhnim  Scrr.  ran  BnuiBT.  Th.  L  p.  120.)    ffdptriei  (Angllberti)  CatoL  H.  et  Leo  Fapa»  ed. 
OrMt^  Tor.  1832. 

II.  K.  Dippold,  Leben  K  Karls.  Tab.  18ia  Bredow,  K.  Karl.  Altona.  1914.  Capefigne^  Cbari*- 
magne.  Par.  1&42.  2  Th.-^  O.  Walch,  Hist  canonisatlonis  Car.  M.  Jen.  ll^.^PHUter,  de  instaorat 
Imp.  Kom.  GutL  1766flw  10  P.  4.    [O.  P.  H.  Janus,  life  of  C  Lond.  1847.  A  New  York.  1848.] 

The  grand  objects  to  which  Charles  the  Great  devoted  his  life  were,  the 
union  of  all  the  German  nations  under  his  sway,  and  the  establishment  of 
civilization  among  them.  He  favored  and  governed  tlie  Church  because  it 
was  a  school  for  the  improvement  of  his  people.  He  was  careful  to  main* 
tain  the  same  respect  for  the  popes  which  his  father  had  shown,  and  he  even 
increased  their  power,  but  kept  them  in  a  state  of  dependence  upon  himself. 
For  Hadrian  /.  he  entertained  a  strong  personal  attachment.  Leo  III  (after 
705)  sought  refuge  in  his  court  from  the  ill  treatment  inf  icted  by  a  Koman 
faction,  cleared  himself  by  an  oath  from  the  crimes  imputed  to  him,  and  was 
reinstated  by  the  power  of  the  king.  In  gratitude  for  this  kindness,  and  pro* 
fessing  to  act  under  divine  inspiration,  the  pope,  on  Christmas  day  800,  placed 
the  imperial  crown  of  Home  upon  the  king's  head,  while  the  people  ex- 
claimed, "  Health  and  victory  to  Carolus  Augustus,  crowned  of  God  I  "  By 
this  ceremony,  no  actual  increase  of  power  was  directly  acquired,  but  the 
monarch  became  invested  with  an  augmented  dignity  in  the  eyes  of  the  peo- 
ple, and  his  authority  in  the  West  became  sacred.  It  was  only  a  thought, 
but  the  world  is  governed  more  by  thoughts  than  by  swords.  By  this  re- 
newal of  the  empire  in  the  West  the  pope  recognized  a  master,  but  all  men 
saw  that  this  master  was  of  his  own  creation. 


CHAP.    III.  — ECCLESIASTICAL    LIFE. 

§  1C3.    Religious  Spirit  of  the  People, 

The  innocence  of  a  rude  and  powerful  nation  was  soon  corrupted  by  Ro- 
man vices,  the  new  pleasures  soon  became  necessities  of  life,  and  to  obtain 
them  the  energies  of  the  people  were  employed  in  violence.  The  lives  of  the 
Merovingian  princes  were  filled  with  murders,  adulteries,  and  incests.  But 
just  as  these  children  of  nature  were  suddenly  made  acquainted  with  a  cor- 
rupt civilization,  Christianity  was  fdso  introduced  among  them,  and  preserved 
in  the  minds  of  the  people  a  love  for  more  exalted  objects,  but  accelerated 
the  period  in  which  the  national  advancement  was  interrupted.  It  pervaded 
even  the  German  language,  not  merely  by  the  naturalization  of  Greek  and 
Latin  ecclesiastical  terms,  but  by  giving  a  Christian  signification  to  original 
Gennan  expressions,  (a)  The  relation  of  the  people  to  Christ  was  conceived 
of  by  them  as  that  of  faithful  vassals  to  a  mighty  leader  (Gefolgsherrn).  If 
the  mysterious  spectacles,  miracles,  and  legends  of  the  Church  did  not  always 
reform  the  people,  they  at  least  produced  some  regreta  for  the  past  and  some 
anxiety  for  the  future.  But  superstition  soon  supplied  them  with  arts  bj 
which  they  could  cunningly  escape  her  own  guardianship.    The  peijurer 


a)  JZl  «.  Baumer  ($  147)  eapeclallf  in  tbe  8  booka,  pu  STSbb. 


CHAP.  IIL  SOCLES.  LIFE.    iieS,  COMMON  LIFE.    $161  DISCIPLINE.  175 

cored  himself  by  relios  against  the  Tengeanoe  of  heaven,  and  the  hired  assas- 
nn  consoled  himself  with  the  reflection  that  whatever  might  occur  in  his 
bloody  coarse,  he  would  have  means  to  purchase  the  masses  needfol  for  his 
nlvation.    The  virtnes  on  which  the  Church  most  insisted  were  liberality, 
hospitality,  fidelity  in  the  pajrment  of  tithes  and  offerings,  and  an  accurate 
knowledge  of  the  creed  and  the  Lord's  prayer.    The  liberty  which  the  Grer- 
mans  had  always  exercised  of  divorcing  themselves  from  their  wives  on  the 
repayment  of  dower  was  abolished,  and  marriage  was  regarded  as  indissolu- 
Me,  except  by  mutual  consent  for  sacred  purposes,  or  on  account  of  adultery, 
oon^iracy  against  life,  banishment,  or  bodily  infirmity  on  the  part  of  the 
wife,  (h)    The  Church  and  the  new  government  contended  against  those 
remnants  of  heathenism  which  still  adhered  to  the  &ith  or  practice  of  the 
people,  as :  the  exposure  of  children,  the  burning  of  corpses,  the  old  sanctu- 
iries  by  fountains,  in  the  lofty  forest  and  in  the  stone  circle,  wooden  repre- 
wntations  of  bodily  organs  as  votive  offerings,  images  of  gods  dried  in  ovens 
or  highly  ornamented,  the  use  of  horseflesh,  haunted  places,  watch-fires,  rain- 
makiDg,  sacred  lots,  death-charms,  love  potions,  the  use  of  wooden  images  to 
effect  the  death  of  those  they  represent,  magical  predictions,  and  witchcraft 
of  aU  kinds,  (e)    The  less  objectionable  portions  of  the  ancient  were  gradu- 
ally incorporated  with  the  Christian  faith,  legends  of  the  gods  were  trans- 
formed into  legends  of  saints,  recollections  of  the  former  deities  were  so 
changed  as  to  become  a  basis  for  a  belief  in  magic,  in  leagues  with  the  devil, 
and  in  violent  assaults  from  him.    A  pleasant  recollection  was  also  retained 
for  the  silent  people  of  the  elves,  and  the  wonderful  gifts  of  the  fairies.    Or- 
deals were  at  first  tolerated  by  the  Church,  then  opposed,  and  finally  used  for 
its  own  purposes.    A  presentiment  of  the  approach  of  the  last  day  which 
lometimes  comes  up  before  us  in  this  period,  was  suggested  merely  by  those 
Bomans  who  thought  that  the  overthrow  of  the  empire  and  the  terrible  na- 
tkmal  migrations  were  signals  of  that  event,  (d) 

§  164.  Feehsiastieal  DUeipline, 

The  discipline  of  the  Church  was  much  opposed  by  the  German  people  on 
the  ground  that  it  was  inconsistent  with  their  liberties.  It  was  finally  en- 
fwoed  in  the  eighth  century,  at  least  among  the  conmion  people,  by  the  Sy- 
iMdal  courts^  which  were  accommodated  to  the  popular  feelings  of  private 
rights.  In  the  course  of  each  year  the  bishop  or  his  arch-deacon  held  his 
oout  in  every  important  place  within  his  jurisdiction,  in  which  honorable 
niea  chosen  from  the  congregation  acted  as  a  jury  to  decide  upon  the  case  of 
those  who  were  accused.  This  inquisitorial  process,  which  took  cognizance 
Bot  only  of  ecclesiastical  but  of  many  civil  offences,  was  an  indispensable 
addition  to  the  easy  proceedings  of  former  times,  when  every  offence  was 
it<iDed  for  by  a  legal  fine  adapted  to  the  simple  manners  of  the  people.  The 
Polities  now  inflicted  were  scourging,  fasting,  prohibition  of  marriage,  and 

»)  CapUuL  a.  752.  c.  0.  9.    iWalUr  Th.  IL  p.  88as.)    Greg.  IL  ad  BonlC  o.  S.    {Manti  Th.  XIL 

c)  IfeiaJlj  iDdlenloa  BapetBtitionain  (g  14a) 

^  Grtfcrii  M.  L  XL  Epi  M.    Grtg,  Twr,  TL  FnuM.  Prologon 


176     ANCIENT  CHURCH  HISTOBT.  FEB.  IL  GERMANIC  CHURCH.  A.  D.  8M-«)QL 

an  imprisonment,  which  for  the  heavier  offences  was  severe  and  sometimes 
for  life,  (a)  None  but  private  offences  voluntarily  disclosed  in  the  confes- 
sional were  allowed  to  be  atoned  for  according  to  the  former  custom  by  & 
fine.  In  such  cases  the  money  belonged  to  the  poor,  and  the  Ohurch  always 
suffered  under  the  imputation  that  she  allowed  the  rich  to  sin  freely  and  yet 
gave  them  the  hope  of  heaven,  (b)  Confession  to  a  priest  was  looked  upon 
as  beneficial  but  not  indispensable  to  salvation,  (e)  Excommunication  was 
not  common,  and  was  therefore  the  more  dreaded.  Although  the  bishops 
had  obtained  a  law  which  connected  civil  death  with  excommunication,  it 
was  understood  that  such  a  result  would  not  take  place  without  the  consent 
of  the  king.  By  this  means  the  bishops  were  obliged  to  pay  great  respect  to 
the  intercession  of  the  king  or  of  persons  of  distinction,  (d) 

§  165.    Morals  of  the  Clergy^  and  Cananieal  Life, 

As  the  bishops  were  generally  selected  irom  the  royal  retinue,  and  the 
clergy  were  sometimes  oven  slaves  and  servilely  dependent  upon  their  supe- 
riors, bishoprics  were  often  obtained  by  purchase  or  by  fiattery,  (a)  and  the 
clergy  were  in  continual  danger  of  becoming  quite  secularized  or  degraded  in 
ignorance.  Tlie  laws  against  the  marriage  of  clergymen  were  frequently  re- 
newed, but  marriage  was  as  common  amoug  them  as  adultery  and  lewdness. 
What  was  called  mere  fondling  was  expressly  declared  to  be  innocent,  (h) 
For  every  act  and  degree  of  drunkenness  a  precise  form  of  punishment  was 
carefully  prescribed,  (c)  The  laws  forbade  the  servants  of  God  to  bear  the 
sword,  but  neither  law  nor  shame  could  prevent  what  custom  and  feudal  duty 
required.  Many  a  valiant  bishop  never  knew  peace  till  he  slept  on  the  battle 
field.  The  authority  of  the  Church  was  sufficient  to  make  a  clergyman  hon- 
orable on  account  of  the  sacredness  of  his  office,  but  many  a  layman  was 
clever  enough  to  take  advantage  of  the  solemn  dulness  of  his  bishop,  (d)  In 
a  series  of  synods  (after  742)  Boniface  endeavored  to  rectify  the  underical 
manners  and  the  misgovernment  which  prevailed  in  the  Frankish  Church,  by 
demanding  of  the  clergy  a  peculiar  ecclesiastical  character  and  monastio 
habits,  and  that  he  might  secure  these  he  revived  the  old  institution  of  pro- 
vincial synods.  Chrodegang  of  Me&  gave  to  the  clergy  of  his  episcopal 
church  the  conventual  rule  which  required  a  life  in  common  (about  760).  (e) 
Augustine  was  held  up  as  an  example,  and  the  founder  of  this  kind  of  life, 


a)  Capit  a.  769.  c  7.  {Walter  Th.  IL  p.  548.)  a.  818.  c.  1.  {Ibid.  p.  261.)    This  amngement 
of  an  older  date.    For  information  respecting  the  proceedings,  see  Sittenspiegel  der  Zeit,  flrat  in  J2#- 
gino^  de  disc  eco.  II,  2s8.    {Hanhem.  Th.  IL  p.  Wla.) 

b)  Cone  Clovtahovian,  a.  747.  c.  26&  {ManH  Th.  XIL  p.  4088.)  Comp.  Homiliade  haerettdapoo* 
cata  Tcndentlbus.  {MabiUon^  Mnseum  Italicum,  Th.  I.  P.  II.  p.  27.) 

c)  Capit.  Theodiiifi  Aurelianens.  c  80.  {Jifansi  Th.  XIIL  p.  1001.)  Comp.  Cone.  CdbUonenm^ 
818.  can.  88.  {ManH  Th.  XIV.  p.  100.) 

d)  Cone  Paria.  a.  615.  c  8.  {Walter  Th.  IL  p.  14.) 

a)  Oregor.  Tur.  Yitae  patram.  c  6.  $  8.  Hist  Frana  IV,  85.    A  multitude  of  hiatorlea  in  Vbit 
Monachiu  SangalUnsU. 

h)  Gregorii  IIL  can.  6.  {Mansi  Th.  XIL  p.  290.)    e)  Ibid.  can.  8. 
</)  E.  6.  the  \rag  in  SangaU.  L  20.  {PerU  Th.  IL  p.  789.) 

e)  Ckrodtg.  KeguU  in  ManH  Th.  XIY.  p.  81888.  Paulua  ZHae.  Gest  Episc.  Meteosliim.  (. 
Th.  IL  p.  2678.)  Comp.  ThomoMini  yet  et  nova  eoa  diao.  P.  L  L  IIL  c.  2-9. 


CHAP.  m.  BOCLSa.  LIFEL    {lA^  CANONIOL    flM.  WOBSHIP.  177 

wMdi  wu  called  oanonioal,  because  it  was  regulated  by  sacred  laws.  The 
mm^niei  Hved,  eat  and  slept  in  common,  under  the  direct  supervision  of  the 
bishop.  Their  derotions  commenced  long  before  day,  and  were  regulated  by 
a  peculiar  system  of  canonical  hours.  They  were  not  prohibited  the  posses- 
non  of  prlYate  property,  but  their  support  was  provided  for  \fy  the  bishop, 
ovt  of  the  ecclesiastical  reyenues.  Under  the  fiavor  of  the  Garolingian  kings 
fluB  system  was  adopted  in  most  of  the  Grerman  churches. 

§  166.    Publie  Wanhip. 

Ordo  Enauuias  de  dtr.  oflleiis  (Sth  cent)  Amalarli^  Choreplsc  Motensf^  <le  div.  oflldlfl  I.  IV. 
0tf-ST.)  Sabani  Mauri  da  derioonun  InsUt  et  cereinoniis  eoc.  1.  IIL  (619)  &  de  saciis  ordlnibi 
fwinwtfte  dir.  at  rettimentU  Moerd.  GollcotlTeljr  in:  De  div.  oath.  £oe.  officlls  varii  vett  Pfttram 
ae  £>crr.  libri,  ed.  HUtorpiw.  (Col  1568l)  Par.  1610.  t 

As  the  Church  had  been  formed  under  the  Roman  empire,  it  retained 
many  Roman  usages.    Its  services  were  in  Latin,  though  preachiug  was  al« 
ways  in  the  language  of  the  people.    The  British  Church  protested  against 
the  peculiarities  introduced  by  the  Roman  clergy.    They  defended  their  own 
practice  of  shaving  only  the  front  part  of  the  head,  in  opposition  to  the  Ro- 
man tonsure,  by  appealing  to  the  example  of  Paul  (tonsura  Pauli).    Columba, 
when  contending  with  Gregory  the  Great,  defended  a  mode  of  reckoning 
Easter  which  was  different  from  that  used  at  Rome,  {a)    Charles  the  Great 
mtrodooed  the  Gregorian  liturgy  into  the  new  churches  fonned  in  the  em* 
pire,  and  invited  singers  from  Rome,  to  whom  the  sacred  music  of  the  Ger- 
mans seemed  like  the  bowlings  of  wild  beasts.    The  organ,  however,  was 
miieh  improved  in  Germany,  (b)    The  solemn  pomp  of  such  a  worship  was  the 
most  impressive  way  of  addressing  the  robust  feelings  of  an  uneducated  people. 
The  propensity  of  the  age  for  magical  arts  was  gratified  and  strengthened  by 
tbe  numerous  miracles  performed  by  dead  and  living  saints,  the  various  ao- 
coonts  of  which  originated  more  frequently  in  the  fancies  of  the  people  than 
in  the  cunning  policy  of  the  priests.    A  new  festival  caUed  the  Assumption 
•f  the  Virgin  Mary  was  introduced,  and  was  celebrated  on  the  fifteenth  of 
Angast  (e)    An  appearance  of  the  archangel  Michael  was,  after  Gregory ^s 
time,  celebrated  in  Rome,  but  the  decided  preference  shown  for  this  festival 
by  tl»e  Germanic  churches  was  owing  to  the  chivalrous  character  usuolly  as- 
cribed to  this  celestial  prince,  (d)  In  France  St,  Martin  was  honored  as  a  Saviour 
nd  an  Aesculapius,  until  the  writings  ascribed  to  Dionysius  the  Areopagite 
▼ere  tent  to  Pipin,  and  revived  the  memory  of  a  Dionysius  who  had  been 
Bcntioned  as  a  bishop  of  Paris  among  the  martyrs  in  the  time  of  Decius.    As 
tbis  litter  Dionysius  was  confounded  with  him  who  was  contemporary  with 
?«1, 8t,  Denyi  became  henceforth  the  war-cry  of  France.  (< )    The  Spaniards 

<)  Grtgcr.  JT  L  IX.  Ep.  187.  comp.  Beda^  H.  eec  III,  4 

&)  AnmaL  JMen*.  ad.  a.  757.  Joan.  YIII.  Ep.  a.  872.  ad  Annonem.  (Man$i  Th.  XVII.  p.  845.) 

^  IMr«,  doaM,  and  final  confidence:  KpijA.  baer.  7&  11.  Gelaaii  Deeret  {Oratian :  P.  L  D. 
^^- 1  i  1 8fii)  Gregor.  Tur.  de  gloria  Martyr.  I,  4 

<)  Batb^rUn,  BeleeU  de  Mleh.  Archangelo.  Ulmtt  1759.  4. 

*)  Both  Mdnts  are  alreadj  oonftnnded  in :  Acta  DionTiil  (beginning  of  the  9th  eent  Acta  BB.  m. 
^  IK  IV.  p.  79SML)  and  HUduini  (abbot  of  St  Denya  about  884.)  Vita  et  paasio  Dionys.  (Areop«- 
HUei.  Id.  JK  OaUnu*,  CoL  1568.) 

12 


178     ANCIENT  CHURCH  HISTOBY.  PEE.  IL  GEEMANIC  CHUBCH.  A.  D.  819-aoa 

mado  a  knightly  saint  of  the  elder  James^  who,  after  his  body  had  been  found 
at  Oompostella  (791-842),  was  extolled  as  the  apostle  of  Spain,  and  the  patron 
of  its  armies  against  the  Saracens.  The  surest  proof  of  the  power  and  sanc- 
tity of  these  patron  saints  was  yietory.  The  Frankish  empire  became  slightly 
involved  in  the  controversy  respecting  images.  The  dear  judgment  of  Charlei 
the  Great  soon  decided  against  all  image- worship,  and  a  treatise,  published 
under  his  own  name,  (/)  set  forth  in  opposition  to  the  decrees  of  the  second 
sjmod  of  Nicaea  that  God  could  be  worshipped  only  in  spirit.  The  same 
view  was  expressed  at  the  Synod  of  Frarikfort  (794)  and  of  Faru  (825)  with 
an  open  censure  of  Adrian's  treatise  in  favor  of  image-worship.  But  as  this 
opposition  did  not  extend  to  the  destruction  of  the  images,  a  hope  was  enter- 
tained and  expressed  in  these  acts  that  a  reconcfliation  might  yet  be  effected 
between  the  Greek  and  Roman  churches,  (g)  The  popes  found  it  convenient 
to  treat  this  heresy  among  the  Franks  more  mildly  than  the  same  sentiments 
among  the  Greeks. 


CHAP.    IV.— ECCLESIASTICAL   SCIENCJE. 

§  167.    Fresertation  of  Literature. 

Every  thing  in  the  primitive  church  had  a  primary  reference  to  some  type 
in  the  Old  Testament.  The  Gothic  version  of  the  Bible  does  not  seem  to  have 
found  its  way  into  other  German  tribes,  but  fragments  of  translations  of  dif- 
ferent books  of  the  Bible  existed  in  several  German  languages,  and  even  in 
the  Anglo-Saxon.  Remnants  of  Roman  literature  were  preserved  among  the 
clergy  as  a  kind  of  literary  acquisition  even  to  the  age  of  Augustine,  but  the 
classic  authors  were  enjoyed  only  by  stealth.  In  the  stormy  period  of  the 
popular  migrations,  literary  education  was  continued  in  Spain  and  in  the 
British  islands.  In  the  former  country  there  was  a  literary  rivalry  between 
the  Catholics  and  the  Western  Goths,  who  had  now  become  interested  in  the 
study  of  Grecian  learning.  Among  these  Goths,  Isidore^  Archbishop  of 
Hispalis  (Seville,  595-686),  was  particularly  influential  in  behalf  of  the  politi- 
cal power  of  the  Church,  a  moderate  monastic  life,  and  Christian  kindnen 
toward  the  Jews,  and  was  an  eminent  example  of  that  ecclesiastical  learning 
which  was  not  only  mistress  of  all  secular  knowledge,  but^  by  collecting  the 
works  of  ancient  authors,  secured  the  inheritance  of  antiquity,  (a)  The  pre- 
dominance of  the  Roman  element  renders  it  difficult  to  trace  the  prooen 
by  which  a  transition  was  made  to  that  which  was  more  decidedly  Germanio. 
In  the  Islands  a  degree  of  learning  was  maintained  in  consequence  of  the 
rivalry  between  the  British  and  the  Anglo-Saxon  churches,  and  the  intimate 

/)  Lihri  Carolini, a.  790.  od.  Eli.  PhilL  1549.  Ileumann^  Han.  1781.  (Golda$t  Imper.  Deer. p.  67.) 
g)  Cone.  Franco/,  can.  2.  (JfanH  Th.  XIIL  p.  909.)    Cane,  Paris,  ad  Ludov.  (lb.  Th.  XIV. 
p.  415s.)    [Landon,  p.  252flw  &  4Cls.] 

a)  Eccles.  Literature,  Liturgy,  Explanations  of  laws  and  treatises,  General  history,  history  of  Ger- 
manic nations  and  etymological  encyclopedia.  0pp.  ed.J.du  SretU^  Par.  1601.  t  F.  Grial^  Matrit  1778L 
2  Th.  t  F.  Arevalwu  Rom.  17978S.  7  Th.  4  Cknnp.  BraulionU  Praenotatio  libronun  &  laldori  Ib 
Oudin^  Commtr.  de  Scrr.  eoc  Th.  L  p.  158i. 


CHAP.  IV.    ECCLES.  SCIENCE.    $  167.  BEDR    S  16S.  ALCUIN.  179 

coQDection  which  the  latfer  kept  np  with  Rome.  Theodore^  a  native  of  Tar- 
itif  and  Archbishop  of  Canterbury  (668-90),  diffused  in  England  a  knowledge 
of  the  Greek  language  and  literatare.  From  this  school  proceeded  the  Vene- 
mble  Jkde^  a  monk  of  Tarrow,  who  was  honored  as  the  representative  of  all 
the  knowledge  possessed  in  his  time,  and  was  a  faithful  teacher  as  well  as 
kamer  to  the  lost  moment  of  his  life  (785).  {h) 

§  168.     Scientific  Education  under  the  CaroUngians. 

C  n.  tan  Herutrden^  de  lis,  qnae  a  Car.  M.  tnm  ad  pro)>ag.  rel  chr.  turn  ad  emendandain  ejas- 
dem  ducendi  ratlonem  acta  sunt  L.  B.  1.S25.  A.  F.  Lortnia^  Alculns  Lebcn.  Hal.  1S29.  J.  C.  F.  Aieftr^ 
Gctcb.  d.  rum.  Literntuiim  karoling.  Zeltalter.  Carlar.  1S40. 

In  the  Frankish  Church  some  interest  was  created  by  Boniface  in  the  lite- 
rature of  his  uativo  land,  and  he  appears  to  have  taken  ])ains  to  improve  the 
Jargon  in  which  the  Latin  baptismal  formula  was  uttered  by  the  ignorant  Ba- 
varian priests.    But  even  he  regarded  the  belief  in  the  antipodes  as  a 
heresy,  (a)    Charles  the  Great  conversed  in  Latin,  understood  the  Greek,  and 
in  the  circle  of  his  learned  friends  laid  aside  his  crown ;  but  his  hand  was 
more  accustomed  to  the  sword,  and  began  to  form  written  characters  late  in 
life  with  extreme  difficulty.    Even  the  tales  and  heroic  songs  then  current 
imong  the  people,  but  which  being  neglected  by  the  Church  were  passing 
into  oblivion,  he  vainly  attempted  to  preserve.    His  own  education  had  been 
derived  from  Itidy,  and  the  few  men  of  learning  to  whom  he  could  intrust 
his  plan  of  popular  education  were  either  from  the  same  country  or  from  Eng- 
land.   Among  these  was  Alcnin,  (h)  at  an  earlier  period  a  canon  and  a  su- 
perintendent of  the  convent-school  of  York  and  an  abbot  at  Tours  (d.  804)^ 
t  pious,  intelligent,  and  active  man,  but  possessed  of  only  ordinary  natural 
tilents.    He  conducted  a  school  in  the  palace  itself  (schola  palatina),  and  by 
its  means  established  other  schools  of  learning  for  the  seven  liberal  arts  (tri- 
liom  and  qnadrivium)  in  the  cathedrals  and  convents  throughout  the  em- 
pire. (<r)    Popular  schools  were  also  founded  in  his  own  diocese  by  l^eodulf, 
Kihop  of  Orleans  (d.  821).    A  collection  of  sermons  selected  from  the  writ- 
fcgs  of  the  fathers  was  formed  under  the  direction  of  the  emperor  by  Paul 
the  Deacon  for  an  example  to  the  clergy  rather  than  for  ordinary  reading,  (d) 
Bat  all  this  literary  improvement  was  not  a  direct  growth  of  the  popular  life, 
hot  ft  foreign  importation.    Hence  even  the  writings  of  the  first  men  of  the 
age  seldom  exhibit  the  fresh  living  spirit  of  the  people.    On  the  other  hand 
^Sbai  prose  and  verse  are  written  in  an  unnatural,  clumsy  style,  indicating 
that  the  whole  was  only  a  remnant  of  a  decayed  civilization,  except  where  it 
inmediately  reflected  the  purely  practical  life  and  struggles  of  society  in  let- 


I)  Cocnoie&tarj,  Ilomiliea,  Letters,  Hifltories,  Onunmar,  Aatronomy.  Opi>.  Baa.  8  Th.  t  Col  16^ 
4TkC «L  <rtfe«,  Lond.  1848.  5 Tb.  [Ilto  eccL  Illftt  A  the  Sax.  ChroiL  are  transL  by  Oilft,  Lond. 
UA  U]   CuUterti  Vlu  Bedae  Yen.  (prefixed  to  0pp.)  If.  Oehle^  de  Bedae  V.  vita  et  scrlptis.  Lngd. 

•)  A«</.  Epi  61    (W'irdftc.  p.«4«.)-Ep.82.  (/6.P.28S8.) 

I)  Commentaiy,  Ilo^1iIle^  dogm.,  moral  pblLf  A  astronom.  treatlB^,  Uvea  of  the  saints,  poems,  di 
■Pitt cpistlea.    Opp.  ed.  Frob&nius,  Batlsb.  1778b.  2  Tb.  £ 
«)  Conp  Vtil.  Schmidt,  la  notes  to  Petri  AlfimH  Discipl.  derlcalla.  Bcr.  1S27.  1  p.  lOtaw 
^  Homlllarlom.  Spir.  14S2.  Ba&  1498.  £  h  often. 


180     ANCIENT  GUUBCH  HISTORY.  PER.  IL  GERliANIO  OHUBCH.  A.  D.  nS^WK 

ten  of  businefls  and  in  laws.  Such  foreign  nngraoefol  forms  in  whioh  the 
newly  awakened  spirit  attempted  to  clothe  itself,  seemed  like  the  tattered 
garments  of  the  European  on  the  stately  son  of  the  forest. 

§  169.  AdaptionisU, 

L  Elipandi  Ep.  ad  Fidelem.  a.  785.  BeaU^AEIheHi  adv.  Elfjx  L  IL  {GaUand.  Tb.  XIIL)  AU 
culntts :  adv.  Elip.  1.  L  £p.  ad  F^licem  A  adv.  Fel  I.  YIL  (principally  in  Froben.)— 

II  Fr.  Walch,  Ilist  Adoptiaaor.  Ooett  1735.  Frobmii  Da.  do  haer.  Elip.  et  Felic  (0pp.  Alcaini 
Th.  I.  p.  928.) 

Blipandtis,  Archbishop  of  Toledo,  and  Felix,  Bishop  of  Urgel,  carried  out 
the  Nestorion  doctrine  to  its  extreme  results,  and  maintained  that  Christ  was 
the  Son  of  God  in  his  human  nature,  only  by  adoption,  and  consequently 
that  there  could  be  no  proper  union  of  his  divine  and  human  attributes. 
Though  this  Adoptionism  was  condemned  at  the  Synod  of  Frankfort  (794)  it 
exalted  itself  against  the  authority  of  the  Church ;  but  at  the  Synod  of  Aix- 
la-Chapelle  (799)  Felix,  whose  diocese  was  in  the  Spanish  March,  and  there- 
fore subject  to  Charles  the  Great,  was  persuaded  by  Aleuin  to  recant  his 
opinions.  Although  this  retraction  was  insincere,  or  at  least  not  adhered  to, 
and  Elipandus,  who  lived  under  the  protection  of  the  Saracens,  was  especially 
violent  in  his  opposition,  the  controversy  was  too  little  consonant  with  the  • 
spirit  of  the  times  to  survive  its  original  authors. 


MEDIAEVAL  CHURCH  HISTORY. 

THIRD  PERIOD. 

FEOM  CHABLES  TO  INNOCENT  III. 


-•-^^ 


§  170.     General  View  and  Authorities, 

L  $  147  A  S  US.    1)  CanUii  Lectlones  antiqaao  (Injrolst  1601.)  Ed.  Bamage,  Antn.  1725.  4  ▼.  £ 

l^Ackery^  yett.  Scrr.  Spicllegium.  Par.  (1658)  Ed.  de  la  Barre,  1728.  8  t.  C  Balutii  Mlsccllaoea. 

(Pv.  1^&)  Ed.  Man9t  Lnc.  1761. 4  Tb.  £  MabiUon^  vett  Analecta.  Par.  1728.  t  Marine  et  Durand  : 

TbM.  Dorns  Anecdotor.  Par.  1717.  6  t.  C  Jc  vett.  Scrr.  et  MonQin.  Ck>L  ampllm.  Par.  17248&.  9  v.  f. 

ite,Thc&.  Aneodotor.  Aug.  Vind.  1721.  6  v.  C— Regesta  regam  atqae  Impp.  Rom.  Orlg.  Docc  of  the 

£oman  Emperors  from  911  to  1818  In  extracts,  with  References,  by  Boehmtr.  FrkC  1831.  4.   Boeh- 

twr,  sbowing  the  Imperial  laws  firom  900  to  1400.  FrkC  1S32.  4—3)  Ann<iUif  FuldensM  by  contem- 

pmrles  88S-901.   {PtrU  Th.  L  p.  861.)   BeHiniani  885-6S2  by  Prudentiua  of  Troyes  dc  Ulncmar 

of  Bhelmflw  {PerU  Th.  L  p^  419.)  Bfffino,  Abbot  of  Pruom,  d.  915,  Ghronicon,  documentary  S70-907. 

cont  till  967.  {Peris  Th.  L  p.  537.)    Flodoard^  canon  at  Rhelms  d.  966.  AnnaIe^  919-66.  {PerU  Th. 

v.  p.  868.)  Lindprtmd^  Bp.  at  Cremona,  d.  972,  Antapodoeis  I.  Y L  Jc  de  rebus  geatls  Otton  M.  (PerU 

Th.  V.  p.  264.)  WiducMnd^  monk  of  Corvey,  d.  about  1000,  Annalee  de  reb.  Saxonum  gestia.    (  Wei- 

^om.  Tb.  L  p.  629.  oomp.  LeihnU,  Th.  1.  p.  20S.)    Thietmar^  Bp.  of  Mersebarg.  d.  1018.  Ghronicon, 

Ust  rf  the  Sax.  Empp.  (ed.  J.  A.  Wagner^  Nor.  1807.  4.  Lappenherg  In  P«rto  Th.  V.  p.  723.)  Her' 

■MaAM  Coniractwt^  monk  of  Relchenan,  d.  1054,  Chron.  fh>m  Christ,  but  esp.  1000-^  cont  by  Ber- 

AoMm  of  Relchenaa  till  1080,  extracts  &  continuation  by  Bemoldua  of  &  Blaise  till  1100.    (Perti 

Th.  YII,  67.  26L)  Lamberttu  Scka/naburgensis,  a  monk  of  Ilersfeld,  do  rob.  gcstis  Germ.  1039-77. 

iVrbTh.  TIL  p.  134.)  MarHanu9  Scotus,  a  monk  of  Cologne,  Fnlda  &  Mentz,  d.  1086,  Chronia  till 

lAS2,cont  by  Abbot  Z>ocf0cA^ntf«  till  1200.  {Peris  Th.  VII.  p.  481.)    Sigehertue  GemblacenHs,  d. 

1111, COOL  hy  ffieronymi  Chronicon,  881-1111.   (PerUTh.  VIII.  p.  26a)   Otto  FHHngeru.  d.  1168, 

Oma.  remm  ab  initio  mundi  ad  ann.  1146  gestar.  L  VIII.  cont.  by  Otto  ds  K  Blasio  UII  1209! 

rMermann  Th.  IL  p.  449.)  Chronicon  Urspergense^  till  1126  by  a  monk  of  Bamberg,  cont  by  Bur- 

cbard  k  Conrad  of  Lichtenau,  Abbots  of  Urspcrg,  till  1229.  (Argentor.  537.  609.  f )  Chronica  regia 

&  &  Pantaleoni*  by  monks  of  the  conrent  of  8.  Pantaleon  at  Cologne,  1000, 1106,  iSc  1162.  (Eccard 

Th.  L  pL  6S8.)  cont  by  Godefridu^  a  monk  of  the  same  place  till  1237.  {Freh^r  Th.  L  p.  835.— 

3)  Adamnt  Brementia^  after  1067  a  canon  of  Bremen,  Oesta  Hammenburgensis  Ecc  Pontificum,  till 

WT4  (Ed.  Lappenberg  in  Pert»  Th.  IX.  p.  267.  Uebera.  m.  Anm.  t.  Carsten  Jfieeegaea.  Brm.  1S25.) 

OieHcut  VUaUe,  a  monk  of  St  Eyroul,  d.  after  1142.  Blst  ecc.  1.  XIII.  till  1142.)    [The  Eoclea. 

BM.  of  Eogl  by  Od.  Vit  has  been  transl.  and  puM.  by  Bohn.  Lond.  1854]    l>u  Chctn^  ScripU. 

KonnaBQ.  Par.  1619.  t  p.  819.    According  to  the  more  correct  French  text  by  Dubois,  Par.  lS25ss. 

^^)  4)  Continaators  of  Theophanes :  Joanna  Skylitxa  811-1037  &  lOSl.  Jo8.  (r^M^tM  818-47, 

^  Diaconus  till  975,  Simeon  Logotheta  till  967,  Leo  Orammatieus  UU  1018,  Geo.  Cedrenus  till  1067. 

l^tdiAttaUota,Ut)m  1066 to  1078]  Jo.  Zemnrn^ till  lllS,  iV7c«to«  Acominatut  till  1206,  Geo.  Aero- 

P^^  tin  1261.  (Uiat  Byzant  Scrr.  Par.  164580.  42  Th.  t    Corpus  Scrr.  Uist  Byzant  Bonn.  lS28sa.)- 

n.  pi  1147. 

The  plans  which  Oharles  the  Great  had  began  to  execute  with  so  much 
Ti(dence  and  hope  were  -apparently  quite  abandoned  by  his  saccessors.    But 


182  MEDIAEVAL  CnUBCH  HISTORY.    PER.  IIL    A.  D.  800-m«. 

the  Church,  though  externally  shaken,  secretly  nourished  its  higher  life  and 
imparted  Roman  civilization  to  Germanic  energy  and  profundity.  Accord- 
ingly in  the  tenth  century  when  both  the  hierarchy  and  ^q  feudal  m&narchy 
became  strong,  and  when  men  no  longer  relied  upon  mere  physical  force,  but 
contended  with  a  youthful  and  romantic  enthusiasm  for  honor,  love,  and 
faith,  the  church  naturally  became  the  supreme  power  of  the  age,  because  it 
was  the  educator  of  the  people,  and  held  in  its  hands  all  the  treasures  of  spi- 
ritual grace  for  earth  and  heaven.  Whenever  it  entered  the  lists  against  mere 
brute  force  it  was  of  course  defeated,  but  it  always  held  the  first  place  in  the 
hearts  of  the  people.  Under  these  circumstances  the  power  of  the  pope  so 
much  increased  that  he  was  looked  upon  as  the  head  of  the  Church,  and  the 
representative  of  its  spiritual  power,  in  contrast  with  the  imperial  govern- 
ment. Evejy  pope  who  understood  his  position  must  have  felt  that  he  was 
the  protector  of  political  freedom  and  the  deliverer  of  all  who  were  op- 
pressed. The  Germanic  people  became  divided  into  different  nations,  and 
indeed  every  estate,  every  city,  and  every  corporation  endeavored  to  become 
independent.  But  the  common  connection  of  all  nations  and  orders  with  the 
papacy  united  them  together  as  one  great  Christian  family,  in  whose  general 
enterprises  all  distinctions  were  forgotten  and  national  peculiarities  were  dis- 
regarded. The  prominent  thing,  therefore,  in  the  history  of  this  period,  is  the 
development  of  the  papacy  until  its  influence  extends  to  every  thing  elSe,  and 
around  it  are  grouped  all  the  ecclesiastical  relations  of  the  Western  world. 
The  north-eastern  part  of  Europe  was  now  generally  converted  to  Christian- 
ity. In  the  East,  the  great  conflict  with  the  West  between  the  hosts  of  Islam 
and  those  of  the  Cross  was  just  enkindled,  but  the  Oriental  Church  was  only 
passively  involved  in  it,  and  the  only  reason  we  recollect  her  sluggish  exist- 
ence was  her  dependence  upon  more  active  agents. — Almost  every  generation 
of  this  period  is  represented  by  its  own  chroniclers,  who  wrote  a  history  of 
the  world  from  a  position  more  or  less  of  an  ecclesiastical  character.  Many 
of  them  commence  with  the  creation  of  man,  or  at  least  with  the  birth  of 
Christ ;  but  the  ages  preceding  their  own  were  described  by  writers  like  them- 
selves, and  every  chronicle  and  every  section  of  it  is  an  original  authority 
only  where  it  contains  some  earlier  documents,  or  records  some  contempora- 
neous event.  Few  of  them  were  written  by  a  single  individual,  but  most  of 
them  were  the  common  property  of  a  whole  convent,  on  which  several  gene- 
rations were  employed  as  original  authors  or  revisers.  Those  most  worthy 
of  our  notice  are :  Liudprand,  who  gives  a  dark  coloring  even  to  dark  pas- 
sages of  history,  and  although  his  bitterest  expressions  are  no  calumnies,  he  is 
sometimes  not  very  exact,  and  with  reference  to  Italian  aflfairs  he  displays  too 
much  passion,  (a)  The  German  history  of  Lambert  of  Ilersfeld  is  just  such 
a  picture  of  society  as  might  be  expected  from  a  pious  monk  who  had 
made  a  pilgrimage  to  the  holy  sepulchre,  and  looked  out  upon  the  world  and 
his  nation  from  the  small  stained  window  of  his  cell.  Sighert  of  Gembloun^ 
though  a  monk  and  enthusiastic  for  ecclesiastical  sanctity,  represents  the  em- 
peror's cause  against  the  pope,  and  indicates  the  approach  of  a  time  when 

a)  Martini,  Denkschr.  d.  Akad.  z.  Manohen.  1809.  Hist  Claase.  p.  Sob,  R  A.  Ko^pke^  de  Tlta  M 
BcripUs  Uadp.  Ber.  1843. 


CHAI».  I.     PAPACY.    S  172.  DONATION  OF  C0N8TANTINB.  183 

sacb  conflicts  of  piety  and  patriotism  were  common,  (b)  Otho  of  Freisingen^ 
the  unde  and  the  historian  of  the  emperor  Frederic,  in  the  spirit  of  an  eccle- 
fliastioal  prince,  familiar  with  the  world  in  its  highest  stations,  and  mediating 
between  the  sword  and  the  crosier,  wrote  a  history  of  the  world  and  of  his 
times,  as  if  it  were  a  tragedy  ending  with  the  final  Judgment.  Adam  of 
Bremen^  living  at  the  centre  of  the  great  northern  bishopric  over  which  he 
presided,  with  considerahle  historical  skill  relates  the  history  of  the  Northern 
Chnrch  at  its  establishment,  according  to  original  records,  traditions,  and  per- 
sonal recollections,  (e)  If  in  these  contemporary  writers  the  sentiments  and 
snperstition  of  the  age  is  clearly  reflected,  we  have  in  the  Byzantine  histo- 
rians a  more  elegant  and  learned  picture  of  their  own  court,  and  some  occa- 
sional notices  of  the  Western  Barharians,  like  faint  yistas  of  another  age. 


CHAP.  I.— GENERAL  DEVELOPMENT  OF  THE  PAPACY. 

L  AnattaHtu  (S  ISa)  Martinv  PoUmui  (d.  1278),  Chronioon.  CoL  1618.  £— IL  a  Hl^fUr^  d. 
dMitsehen  Pftpste.  Segensb.  1889.  Sd  ptft 

§  171.     General  View. 

Until  the  time  of  Gregory^  the  papacy  contended  for  dominion  over  the 
Cbnreh,  not  so  mnch  because  the  popes  themselves  were  amhitiotis  to  acquire 
it,  as  because  the  necessities  of  the  times  and  of  those  who  understood  them 
compelled  them  to  do  so.  The  vicegerent  of  God  on  earth,  in  the  midst  of 
the  distractions  which  took  place  in  Italy,  often  had  not  where  he  could 
securely  lay  his  head ;  and  even  when  the  party  which  sustained  him  was 
victorious,  his  office  as  the  successor  of  St.  Peter  was  little  more  than  a  good 
benefice.  But  after  Gregory's  time,  the  struggle  for  the  freedom  and  ascend- 
ency of  the  Church  was  in  many  respects  changed.  The  power  of  the 
Chnrch  was  then  estahlished  on  the  hroad  hasis  of  a  territorial  possession, 
and  by  that  very  process  it  had  entered  the  territory  and  intruded  upon  the 
province  of  the  state.  Hence  the  stmggle  hetween  the  imperial  and  the 
papal  power  now  became  inevitahle,  and  could  not  be  hrought  to  an  issue 
Tvithont  a  sacrifice.  From  its  more  perfect  x>ower  over  the  higher  nature  of 
man,  the  papacy  was  triumphant,  but  the  Church  gained  nothing  hy  the  vic- 
tory, the  vital  interests  of  the  state  were  seriously  injured,  and  accordingly 
the  conflict  between  the  two  was  not  terminated. 

§  172.    Donation  of  ConsUntine  in  the  Ninth  Century. 

Although  the  pope  was  the  emperor's  vassal,  and  chosen  under  the  impe- 
rial dictation,  (a)  he  was  nevertheless  honored  hy  each  emperor  as  a  spiritual 

5)  5.  JIir$chj  de  Sig.  Oemb.  vita  et  scriptis.  Ber.  1341. 

e)  Jac.  AMmuMen^  de  fontibns  Adami  Brem.  Kilon.  1834.  4  Lappenhurg  in  Portz  Archiy.  voL 
VLP.Ca. 

a)  £  g.  YiU  Lnd.  Pii  per  Attronomum  c.  85s.  (Pert»  Th.  II.  p.  619a.)  Leo  IV.  Lotbaria  {Ora^ 
Uan, :  P.  L  Dist  X.  c.  9.)  The  spurioosness  of  the  constitution  in  wbicli  Lonla  the  Pioos  resumes 
tlM  right  of  enflfirage  to  the  Romans  (817) :  F.  Walch^  Censnra  dlplomati^  quod  Lad.  Plus  Paschall 
eoDoetsliie  fiertar.  Lpa.  1749.  {PiAtU  Bylloge,  Th.  YI.  p.  S7a)  Marino  Marini,  naoTo  esame  dell'aa- 
tentldtA  de  dlplomi  di  Lad.  P.,  Ottone  L  e.  Arrigo  II.  Bom.  1828. 


184  MEDIAEVAL  CHUBCH  UISTOBY.    PER.  IIL    A.  D.  SOO-ISIA. 

&ther,  from  whose  hand  the  crown  was  received.  But  during  the  reign  of 
the  weak-minded  Louis  the  Pions,  and  the  contentions  of  his  sons  for  the 
throne,  the  popes  gradually  withdrew  from  nnder  the  authority  of  the  empe- 
rors,  and  the  hestowal  of  the  crown  appeared  rather  as  an  act  of  special 
favor.  Gregory  /F.,  however  (827-44),  gave  such  offence  by  his  interfere 
ence  in  these  disputes,  that  the  Frankish  bishops  threatened  to  depose 
him.  (P)  As  the  recollection  that  the  secular  power  of  the  pope  was  the  gift 
of  the  German  princes  became  rather  inconvenient,  the  story  was  started 
that  Omstantine  the  Great  had  given  Rome  and  Italy  to  Pope  Syhetter^  and 
that  this  was  the  reason  that  the  imperial  capital  had  been  removed  to  Con- 
stantinople. The  political  power  of  the  pope  had  unquestionably  been  occa- 
sioned by  that  removal,  and  by  merely  substituting  a  direct  intention  of  the 
emperor  for  what  was  the  gradual  result  of  circumstances,  the  story  acquired 
considerable  plausibility,  and  finally  was  confirmed  by  the  fortunate  discov- 
ery of  what  claimed  to  be  the  original  deed  of  gift  by  Ck>nstantine.  (c)  AH 
this,  however,  did  not  prevent  the  emperor  who  appointed  the  pope  and  the 
bishops,  from  prescribing  laws  for  the  Church,  and  governing  it  according  to 
his  own  views  rather  than  theirs,  whenever  the  empire  was  free  from  inter- 
nal distractions.  Even  the  relaxation  of  political  power  which  took  place 
while  the  Carolingian  princes  contended  with  each  other,  was  the  occasion  of 
licentiousness  rather  than  of  liberty  among  the  clergy,  and  exposed  them  to 
the  oppression  of  their  secular  masters. 

§  173.     Pseudo'Isidare. 

Cou*tantf  de  antiq.  cann.  Coll  (Epp.  Pontif.  Bom.  p.  LYI.  $  la)  Ballerini  (Oppi  Leon.  Th.  m. 
p.  CCXVsa.)  Bland  Com.  de  Col  cann.  Isld.  Merc.  Neap.  1760.  4.  {GallandU  Syll  Mog.  1790.  TIl 
n.  p.  I.)  J.  A.  Ttuiner,  de  P.  Isid.  cann.  Col.  Yrat  1S27.  F.  IT.  Knutt,  de  fontib.  ot  consilio  pten- 
doisldoriajiae.  Col  Ooett  1882.  4. 

The  collection  bearing  the  name  of  Isidore  came  to  light  at  intervahi 
much  mutilated,  and  besides  some  later  portions  with  nearly  one  hundred 
spurious  decretab  professing  to  have  been  put  forth  by  different  popes  from 
the  time  of  Clement  I.  (91)  to  that  of  Damasus  I.  (884).  (a)  In  these  enaot- 
monts  is  presented  a  legal  condition,  in  which  the  clergy  were  entirely  dit- 
connected  with  the  state,  and  by  the  dissolution  of  the  metropolitan  and 
synodal  courts,  the  supreme  legislative,  supervisory  and  judicial  powers  be- 
came united  in  the  pope.  The  moral  influence  and  strict  discipline  of  the 
clergy  were  represented  as  dependent  upon  their  complete  separation  from 
the  state.  Many  irrelevant  and  trivial  matters  are  taken  from  the  literature 
of  former  times  and  mingled  with  the  body  of  the  work.  It  professes  in  its 
preface,  and  from  its  singleness  of  aim  it  would  seem  really  to  be,  the  wofk 

h)  Paschaaius  ex  vita  Walae.  (Perta  Th.  IL  p.  6«2.) 

c)  Edictnm  Dom.  Coostantlni  in  P9«ud<hTHdor€^  and  in  the  extracts  of  Oration  :  Dist  XCVL  e. 
18.  Tlie  first  appeal  to  it  is  in  IHncmar^  Epp.  Ill,  18.  In  the  missives  of  Hadrian  to  ChariaB  the 
Oreat  (Codex  Carol  Ep.  49.)  is  the  flnt  genn.  MQneK,  fL  d.  Schenk.  Const  (EniaiiKed  HIat  8eb& 
Lndw.  1828.  toI  IL) 

a)  An  imperfect  edition  by  Merlin:  Tomns  prlmas  qnataor  ooncllioram,  etc  Taldoio  Mictovfc 
Par.  1524.  f.  (Col  15da  Par.  153&)  Contributions  to  a  crit  edit  by  Cam««  and  Kooh  la :  N«tie««t 
extraits  des  manuscrits  do  la  bibl  naUonale.  Tb.  YL  p.  2S6.  Th.  YIL  P.  IL  p^  178«. 


CHAP.  L    PAPACY.    |  lia  PSEUDO-ISIDOBE.  185 

of  an  individoal  who  is  called  IMorua  (Peccator,  Mercator).  Most  of  the 
q»iirioii8  decretals  must  have  been  in  existence  when  Benedict  Levita  compiled 
bis  book  of  laws  (845),  and  thongh  it  may  be  doubtful  whether  they  were 
quoted  in  the  Synod  of  Paris  (829),  they  were  certainly  referred  to  in  the 
Synod  of  Aix-la-Chapelle  (836).  Nicholas  I.,  in  the  year  864,  first  used  a 
certain  collection  unknown  to  him  only  the  year  before,  and  it  may  be  that 
many  things  were  afterwards  added.  It  is  difficult  to  form  any  definite 
opinion  respecting  the  author,  as  many  things  indicate  that  he  was  a  Roman, 
sad  still  more  that  he  was  an  eastern  Frank.  Qi)  The  skill  with  which  it  was 
composed  was  not  greater  than  was  practicable  and  even  necessary  for  that  age. 
Some  opponents  of  the  papacy  since  the  fourteenth  century  have  suspected 
the  deception,  and  Protestants  have  clearly  proved  it  by  pointing  out  refer- 
ences to  the  Codex  Dionysii,  a  constant  use  of  the  barbarous  Latinity  of  the 
ninth  century,  citations  of  laws  of  a  later  date,  and  numerous  anachronisms,  (e) 
After  a  brief  contest,  the  advocates  of  the  papacy  merely  attempted  to  show 
that  sneb  a  deception  was  not  criminal  or  of  much  consequence.  ((Q  And  it 
must  be  conceded  that  the  spurious  decretals  contain  very  little  which  had  not 
been  actnally  asserted  by  some  pope  at  one  time  or  another.  But  that  which  had 
been  only  lately  conceded  or  claimed  under  peculiarly  favorable  circum- 
ftances,  and  with  many  conditions  and  protests,  was  here  announced  under 
the  racred  authority  of  Christian  antiquity  as  an  undoubted,  generally  con- 
ceded, and  divine  right.  A  forged  document  is  indeed  no  very  good  founda- 
tion on  which  to  build  a  claim  for  universal  dominion,  but  as  Isidore  only 
expressed  in  a  decisive  manner  what  was  the  general  object  of  effort  during 
that  age,  he  gave  a  definite  direction  to  the  fluctuating  views  of  right  which 
then  prevailed,  and  filled  even  the  minds  of  tlie  popes  and  clergy  with  the 
nioral  power  of  a  faith  in  their  own  right  to  what  was  claimed.  Men  are 
much  more  inclined  to  judge  of  rights  from  facts  than  from  theories,  and 
bence  this  fiction  respecting  former  times  certainly  anticipated  a  future  real- 
ity, and  gave  considerable  support  to  the  pretensions  of  the  priesthood.  The 
object  of  it  was  to  promote  the  independence  of  the  Church,  which  the 
■me  antlior,  or  some  contemporary  whose  sympathies  were  remurkabl}' 
rimHar  to  his,  endeavored  to  sustain  in  an  earlier  plan,  by  increasing  tlie  diffi- 
culties in  the  way  of  sustaining  charges  against  bishops,  and  by  allowing  them 
to  be  tried  only  in  the  provincial  synods,  (e)  It  was  thought,  however,  that 
this  ooold  be  secured  against  the  threatening  and  overwltelming  power  of  the 
emperor  in  no  other  way  than  by  uniting  the  whole  Church  under  one 


h)  Leo  IV.  a.  860.  ad  Eplsoc  Brltan.  {Gratian:  P.  I.  DIst  XX.  a  1.) 

e)CentiU'.  Magdeburg.  Th.  II.  c  7.  Tb.  III.  e.  7.  (TarHanu%^  adv.  Magtl.  Cont  pro  cann.  app.  et 
<f1k  dccretallbua  Pontt  appu  Par.  15T8.  4.)  Dav.  Blondel^  Pseado-Isid.  et  Tarr.  vapalante«.  Gen. 
169,4 

tf)  WalUr,  KK«eht  8  ed.  Bonn.  1$39.  p.  155fl&  M^hler^  ans  a.  &ber  P.  I^Id.  (Tub.  Qaartalschr. 
US.  H.  K  1S32.  H.  1.  and  miscelL  writings,  vol.  I.)  Only  MarchetH  has  undertoken  &tiU  to  qnestion 
t^fparioiunew  of  the  Decretals.  (Sa^o  crit  aopra  la  storia  di  Fleuri.  Rom.  17S1.) 

t)  Capitula  Angilramni:  Mansi  Th.  XII.  p.  904s8.  According  to  some  Codd.  these  were  a 
MQeetkm  of  TS5  laws  respecUng  legal  proceedings  against  bishope  presented  by  Ansrilram,  Bp.  of  Metz 
md  irch-cbaplain  to  Charles  the  Great,  to  Pope  Adrian,  bat,  according  to  othcn  prej<ented  by  Adrian  to 
iBgnnm.  For  its  aathenticity :  W(ts*er9chUben^  Beitrr.  z.  Gescb.  d.  falschen  DecjetaL  BrsL  1844. 
ipiast  it:  Rettberg^  KOesch.  DeutscbL  vol.  I.  p.  501.  646ml 


186  MEDIAEVAL  CHURCH  HISTOBY.    PER.  IIL    A.  D.  800-1218. 

earthly  head.  It  is  hardly  possible  that  he  who  thns  attempted  to  deceive  the 
whole  Chnrch  and  the  world  had  in  view  any  direct  personal  advantage 
which  he  expected  to  derive  from  it. 

§  174.     The  Female  Pope  Joanna, 

In  the  chronicles  composed  near  the  commencement  of  the  thirteenth 
century,  it  is  recorded  that  between  Leo  IV,  (d.  July  17,  856)  who  hoped  to 
free  himself  from  the  influence  of  France  by  another  connection  with  the 
Greek  empire,  and  Bated  let  IIL,  a  disguised  female  who  had  been  highly 
educated  at  Athens,  was  elevated  to  the  apostolic  chair  under  the  name  of 
John  VIII.  (Anglicus),  and  met  with  a  tragical  end  while  paying  the  penalty 
of  her  sex.  (a)  It  was  on  this  account  that  John  XX.  (1276)  assumed  the 
appellation  of  John  XXI.,  and  this  Joanna  Papism  retained  her  place  on 
the  list  of  the  successors  of  St.  Peter.  But  th^  silence  of  all  antiquity  with 
respect  to  the  matter,  awakened  doubts  in  the  fifteenth  century,  and  when 
proofs  were  brought  forward  that  Benedict  apparently  succeeded  Leo  imme- 
diately in  the  papal  chair,  (b)  with  only  a  contest  with  an  antipope  named  Anas- 
tasius,  (c)  a  Roman  presbyter  who  had  before  been  excommunicated  by  Leo, 
and  when  the  unlucky  affair  was  at  least  boldly  denied  by  the  popes  of  the  elev- 
enth century,  (d)  even  the  Protestants  abandoned  the  account,  (e)  It  does  not 
wear  the  appearance  of  a  calumnious  story,  or  of  a  satirical  allegory,  but  rather 
of  one  of  those  popular  tales  in  which  the  highest  power  of  the  age  was 
treated  with  innocent  poetic  raillery,  and  after  a  German  style,  a  deep  sor- 
row was  concealed  under  a  playful  semblance.  It  is,  however,  possible  that 
a  Church  which  has  often  made  realities  out  of  what  never  existed,  may  also 
possess  magic  power  enough  to  annihilate  what  has  really  taken  place,  when- 
ever the  knowledge  of  it  may  have  seemed  injurious  to  the  still  tottering 

papacy.  (/) 

■ 

a)  SUphanu«  de  Borhons  (1220  in  Lyons)  L.  de  YIL  donls  Sp.  S.  {Blaaeu^  do  ColL  cann.  Ldd. 
c.  16.  {  11.  n.  2.)  Martini  P6L  Chronic,  (comp.  MuratoH  ad  Anastas.  p.  2i7.)  The  passage  relating 
to  the  subjecl  is  interpolatcKl  oat  of  Martlnus  in  a  feir  manuscripts  of  Ana»tasias.  The  mention  of 
the  papal  mother  in  the  editlo  prlnceps  of  Sigebtrt  Oemhlac  ad  a.  855  is  wanting  in  the  HSS. 
hitherto  known.    {Ptrta  Th.  VIII.  840.  470.) 

h)  1)  Uincmari  Ep.  2d.  ad  Nlc  I.  a.  867.  (0pp.  ed.  Sirmond.  Th.  II.  p.  298.)  according  to  which 
his  messenger  received  the  news  of  the  death  of  Loo  while  on  bis  way  to  Bomo,  and  when  he  arrived 
at  Rome  his  petition  was  granted  by  Bene<1ict  2)  A  diploma  of  the  monastery  of  Corbey  (i/clW^ 
lon^  de  re  diplom.  p.  486.) ;  and  8)  A  Roman  denarios  {KOhUr's  M&nzbelost  vol.  XX.  p.  805.)  bay* 
each  the  name  of  Benedict  in  connection  with  that  of  Lothaire.  The  Emperor  Lotbaire  died  Sept 
23,855. 

o)  Jtiff,  Rcgesta  p.  285a.    ITincmari  Annal.  (Periz,  vol.  L  p.  477R8.) 

d)  i>o  IX.  ad  Michael  Constant  Patriarch,  a.  1054.  (ifan«i  Th.  XIX  p.  649.)  c  28. 

e)  B/ondfl,  Joanna  Papissa.  Amst  1657.  O.  Q.  Leibnitii  florcs  sparsi  in  tumulnm  Papiasae. 
(Bibl.  blt*t  Ooett  1758.  Th.  L  p.  29788.)  OabUr,  kirchl  theoL  Bchriflen.  vol  L  N.  29.—  W.  Smeis,  d. 
Mahrchen  v.  d.  P.  Joh.  Colin.  1S29. 

/)  SpanheniU  Da.  deJo.  P.  (Oppc  Th.  IL  p.  6778S.)  Luden,  Gescb.  d.  teatschen  Volkea.  1S81. 
vol.  VI.  p.  512.  K  C.  KUi,  d.  Papetin  Job.  fh>m  tlie  Dutch.  (NederL  Archiof  voor  kerk.  Oeechied- 
cnis  III,  1.  V,  461.)  revised  by  L.  Trow,  (Iligen'a  Zeitschr.  1844.  part  2.) 


CHAP.  L    PAPACY.    §  175.  NICHOLAS  L    HADRIAN  IL    JOHN  VIIL  187 

§  175.  Nicholas  L  858-807,  Ifadria/i  IT,  807-872,  and  John  VIIL  872-^82. 

Jfanti  Tb.  XV.  {>.  144i!«.  Kegloo  ad  ann.  f^SSss.  Hincmar  de  dlvortio  Illotbarii  et  Tcutbergae. 
(0pp.  e*\.  Sirmond.  Th.  I.  p.  657ss.>— Jfciw«i  TIi.  XV.  p.  806ss.  Th.  XVI.  p.  570«aL  JUnc.  Hem, 
Opu5c  95  capitulor.  adv.  llincm.  Laadunens.  (Opp.  Th.  II.  p.  87788.) 

Xicholas  /.,  a  defender  of  the  people,  was  gentle  toward  good  men,  but  like  an 
arenging  Elg ah  toward  those  who  were  evil.  lie  formed  but  never  quite  accom- 
plished the  design  of  surrounding  himself  with  a  council  of  intelligent  bishops 
oQt  of  all  nations.    But  perceiving  the  favorable  disposition  of  the  age,  he  raised 
the  privileges  of  the  apostolic  see  so  that  they  became  a  protection  for  the  whole 
Church,  and  under  the  sanction  of  public  opinion  a  weapon  against  all  kinds 
of  violence.    In  opposition  to  a  lascivious  king  and  a  large  number  of  servile 
bishops,  he  appeared  as  the  avenger  of  oppressed  innocence,  and  as  a  defender 
of  episcopal  rights  against  an  imperious  and  powerful  archbishop.     King 
Loihaire  II,  was  obliged  to  humble  himself,  since  the  hostile  princes  of  his 
own  family  stood  ready  to  execute  the  papal  threats,  and  the  Frankish  bish- 
ops did  not  object  to  have  the  spurious  decretals  applied  for  the  first  time 
•gunst  Hinemar  of  Rheims^  for  they  thought  it  better  to  obey  a  distant  pope 
than  a  threatening  metropolitan  at  home.    It  was,  however,  still  believed 
eren  at  Rome,  that  a  papal  decision  might  very  easily  be  annulled  by  a 
Frankish  synod,  {a)    But  when,  with  no  such  advantage  of  jwlitical  circum- 
Btances,  Hadrian  H.^^tdter  the  death  of  Lothaire  (809),  defended  the  rights 
uf  the  lawful  heir  U>  the  throne  against  Charles  the  Bald  and  Louis  the  Ger- 
man, and  endeavored  to  protect  Hincmar  of  Laon^  a  deposed  bishop  who  had 
ilao  been  persecuted  by  the  king,  from  the  rage  of  his  uncle,  Hincmar  of 
£AWm«,  the  latter  gave,  him  to  understand  that  in  France  a  wide  distinction 
was  made  between  spiritual  and  secular  power ;  that  great  disturbances  of 
pnblic  tranquillity  had  been  created  by  the  pope,  and  that  the  bishops  of 
former  times  had  independent  privileges.    The  pope  therefore  found  it  need- 
M  to  assuage  the  wounded  feelings  of  the  Frankish  nation  by  some  conces- 
aoM,  and  expressions  of  a  holy  love  which  he  declared  hail  always  remained 
eonstant  in  spite  of  some  epistles  that  might  have  seemed  severe  because 
written  under  the  pressure  of  great  infirmity,  or  forged  in  his  name,  (ft) 
John  Vm.  bestowed  (775)  the  imperial  crown  upon  Charles  the  Bald  in  com- 
pliaooe  with  what  he  declared  to  be  a  divine  revelation  to  his  predecessor 
Nicholas,  in  spite  of  the  superior  hereditary  claims  of  the  German  kingdom, 
ind  sustained  the  cause  of  that  prince  by  every  spiritual  menace  in  his  power. 
It  was  then  solemnly  announced  that  this  bestowal  of  the  imperial  dignity 
▼IS  in  consequence  of  the  intercessions  of  the  apostles  Peter  and  Paul, 
through  their  vicegerent  on  earth.    It  corresponded  with  the  political  views 
of  the  emperor  to  compel  the  French  bishops  to  acknowledge  Ansegisus, 
Archbishop  of  Sens,  as  the  primate  and  papal  vicar  for  Graul  and  Germany ; 
hot  under  the  counsel  of  Hincmar  they  persisted  in  obeying  the  holy  father 
only  as  far  as  was  consistent  with  the  rights  of  all  the  metropolitans,  and  with 


o)  Anatttu.  ad  Adonom  Yienn.  {ManH  Th.  XV.  p.  458.)— iT.  RoMteu9cher^  do  Sothado  Eploa 
SaociuQensL     Marb.  1S45.  2  Pgg. 
ft)  Bhtcm,  ad  Badr.  (Oppi  Th.  IL  p.  689.)    JIadr.  ad  Carol  Calr.  {Manti  Tb.  XV.  p.  857.) 


188  MEDIAEVAL  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  IIL    A.  D.  800-lim 

the  laws  of  the  Churdi.  (c)  He  gave  his  consent  to  the  decrees  of  the  Sy- 
nod of  Ratcnna  (877),  in  which  the  papal  approbation  was  declared  indis- 
pensable to  the  iuTestitare  of  the  metropolitans,  the  bishops  wore  made  inde- 
pendent of  all  censures  and  claims  on  the  part  of  the  civil  powers,  and  the 
guardianship  of  widows  and  orphans  was  committed  to  their  hands ;  (d)  bnt 
the  papal  letters  which  interfered  with  the  independence  of  the  empire  and 
the  jurisdiction  of  the  bishops  over  their  clergy,  ho  pronounced  through 
Hincmar  to  be  spurious.  («)  The  pope  fell  finally  by  the  hand  of  an  assassin.  (/) 
Ho  continued  to  the  lost  inflexibly  convinced  of  the  imprescriptible  rights  of 
his  see,  and  of  his  position  as  a  servant  of  God,  contending  against  the  pow- 
ers and  princes  of  the  world  (Eph.  vi.  12).  Sorely  pressed  by  the  Saracens 
in  Lower  Italy,  and  wearied  by  tlic  municipal  and  German  factions  in  Rome, 
he  defended  himself  witl)  extreme  difficulty,  and  sometimes  not  without 
treachery. 

§  176.    F(ynno8U9,  891-896,  and  Stephen  VL  897. 

AuaeiiU  I IL  de  ordlnationibiu  Formoei  (Bibl.  PP.  Lngd.  Th.  XVIL  p.  Iss.)  and  Dial  super  oanM 
et  neg.  Form.  {Jfabill.  AnaL  ed.  2.  p.  2Saa.)    MaMi  Th.  ^VIII.  pi  99s8.  221bs.    Liudprand  1, 8L 

When  Charles  the  Fat  was  deposed  by  the  German  people  on  account  of 
his  incapacity  (887),  and  when,  soon  after,  the  male  line  of  the  Emperor 
Charles  had  become  extinct  in  France,  Germany  and  France  became  distinct 
kingdoms.  Both  nations  were  rent  into  factions  by  the  contentions  of  the 
sons-in-law  and  the  illegitimate  children  of  the  old  royal  family.  Italy  strug- 
gled for  its  independence  even  with  itself.  The  popes,  it  is  true,  were  free 
from  foreign  masters,  but  they  were  often  obliged  to  make  concessions  in  the 
party  contests  of  the  Bomans  and  of  the  Italian  nobles.  Guido^  Duke  of 
Spoleto,  and  Berengar^  Duke  of  Friuli,  contended  with  each  other  for  the 
crown  of  Italy,  and  placed  their  favorites  in  the  papal  chair  according  as 
they  were  severally  successful.  Formoms^  after  a  life  of  great  vicissitude, 
was  elevated  to  the  apostolic  throne,  and  though  he  was  compelled  to  place 
the  imperial  crown  upon  the  head  of  Lambert^  the  son  of  Guide,  he  immfr' 
diately  sununoned  the  German  Arnu{f  to  Rome  to  free  Italy  frx>m  the 
tyranny  of  that  prince.  Amulf  was  then  crowned,  and  the  Romans  were 
made  to  take  the  oath  of  allegiance  to  him,  with  the  understanding  that  their 
duties  to  the  pope  were  in  no  respect  to  be  affected  by  such  an  act  His  suc- 
cessor, Stephen  F/.,  went  over  again  to  the  party  of  Guido,  and  having  dis- 
interred the  body  of  Formosus,  subjected  it  to  the  mockery  of  a  judicial 
trial.  Enraged  at  these  proceedings,  the  opposite  party  had  him  soon  after 
strangled  in  prison. 


c)  Cone  PonUgoneuM  a.  876.    IRnem.  Tr.  ad  Episcc  de  Jure  MetropoL  (0pp.  Tb.  IL  pb  719.) 
Bincm.  AnnaL  {Perta  Th.  L  p.  499aB.) 

d)  ManH  Th.  XYIL  p.  887. 

0)  De  PreabyteriB  diffamatls  ad  Ja  P.    (Hinom.  0pp.  Th.  IL  p.  76Sa.) 
/)  AnnaU  Fuldent.  (T'ertoTh.  L  p.  893.) 


CHAP.  L    PAPACY.    1 177.  SERGIUS  IIL    JOHN  XL  189 

§  177.    Pomocracy,    904-962. 

L  The  principal  Aatborlty  Is  Lladpnnd,  bat  when  he  writes  of  great  ontragefl,  he  most  be  com- 
pared with  oUmt  chronldwi,  eq)eciallf  Flodoardi  Cbron.  and  his  Fragm.  de  Fontifll  Bom.  (JTo- 
bm<m,  Aeta  S8.  O.  Ben.  &  IIL  P.  IL)    J(^^  Bvgesta  pi  807-822. 

IL  Litieker,  Hist  des  rdm.  Tlurenreglmenta.  Lpz.  1707.  4.  (2.  A.  IIl»t  der  mittlem  Zeiten  als  ein 
liebt  ana  der  Fbuternbai  1725.  4.) 

While  Italy  bled  under  the  fends  of  the  nobility,  the  Tuscan  party  obtained 
the  victory  at  Rome,  and  made  their  tool,  Sergius  III.^  pope  (904-911).    At 
the  head  of  this  faction  stood  Alheric,  Marquis  of  Tuscany,  with  his  paramour 
Theodarct^  a  widow  of  a  noble  family,  and  her  daughter  Maria  (Marozia). 
These  last  were  exceedingly  beautiful,  crafty  and  bold  Roman  women,  whose 
love  of  power  and  of  voluptuousness  were  so  subservient  to  each  other  that 
it  was  hard  to  tell  which  was  the  strongest  passion.    For  half  a  century 
their  fiivorites,  sons  and  grandsons,  occupied  the  apostolic  chair.   Maria  made 
no  secret  of  the  parentage  of  her  children,  acknowledging  that  her  husband 
Alberic  was  the  father  of  Alberie^  and  Pope  Sergius  of  John.     On  the 
death  of  Sergius,  the  Archbishop  of  Ravenna,  John  X.  (914-28),  by  the  crimi- 
nal favor  of  Theodora,  became  the  successor  of  St.  Peter.     By  him  the 
strength  of  Italy  was  united  against  the  Saracens,  who  for  forty  years  had 
maintained  a  settlement  on  the  borders  of  the  States  of  the  Church.    At  the 
head  of  a  Greek  and  Roman  imperial  army,  he  destroyed  their  citadel  (916) 
on  the  Carigliano  (liris).    After  the  deatli  of  Theodora,  the  pope,  with  the 
aid  of  his  brother  Peter,  endeavored  to  make  himself  independent.    Maria 
had  the  Fope^s  brother  killed  before  his  eyes,  and  then  caused  him  to  be 
smothered  in  the  castle  of  St.  Angclo  (928).    Her  son,  John  JT/.,  ascended 
the  papal  throne  as  though  it  were  an  inheritance  from  his  father.    She  now 
married  Hugh,  Count  of  ProFvcnce,  who  was  regarded  as  the  real  king  of 
Italy.    But  her  secular  son  Alberic^  in  a  nocturnal  insurrection  of  the  Ro- 
mans, expelled  his  stepfather,  and  as  a  senator  (932-954)  exercised  supreme 
power  in  Rome.    Under  his  administration  the  popes  possessed  nothing  but  a 
spiritoal  jurisdiction.    His  son  Octavum^  after  the  death  of  Agapetus  (966), 
seized  not  only  his  fkther*s  power,  but  the  episcopal  office,  and  was  the  first 
among  the  popes  who  assumed  an  ecclesiastical  name  on  attaining  the  papal 
throne.    As  John  XII,  (955-63),  he  hoped  to  disconnect  tbe  excesses  of  his 
seeohv  life  from  his  ecclesiastical  name  and  office. 

§  178.     The  Popes  under  the  Othos. 

During  the  reign  of  Henry  I.  Germany  became  conscious  of  its  power. 
Otho  L  seized  upon  the  first  favorable  opportunity  for  renewing  the  German 
(lominion  in  Italy,  (a)  Since  that  time  Germany  and  Italy  have  contrived  to 
aert  a  disastrous  influence  upon  each  other.  The  German  king  was  invited 
by  John  XII.  himself  to  deliver  the  mother  of  churches  from  the  violence 
^Berengar  11.^  the  new  king  of  Italy,  and  when  victorious,  he  was  crowned 
bj  the  pope  at  Rome  (962),  on  his  taking  a  solemn  oath  that  he  would  pre- 
Krve  inviolate  the  person  ci  the  pope,  and  all  property  belonging  to  the 

a)  W.  D^nnige»t  Jahrbaeher  d.  Deutschen  Beichs  onter  Otto  L  BerL  1889. 


190  MEDIAEVAL  CIIUECn  HISTORY.    PER.  TIL    A.  D.  800-1218. 

Roman  Charch,'  and  undertake  nothing  in  Borne  without  the  advice  of  the 
pope.  The  pope  and  all  the  notables  of  the  city,  on  the  other  hand,  swore 
on  the  precious  body  of  St.  Peter  that  they  would  henceforth  abandon  the 
cause  of  Berengar  for  ever,  (h)  But  Italy  could  at  that  time  neither  dispense 
with  nor  endure  the  Germans.  John  soon  formed  an  alliance  with  Berengar 
to  drive  them  from  the  country.  Otho  hastened  back  and  had  the  pope 
cited  before  a  Synod  at  Iiome  (968),  which  convicted  him  of  murder,  blas- 
phemy, and  all  kinds  of  lewdness,  deposed  him,  and  elected  Leo  VIIL  in  his 
stead.  The  Romans  then  swore  to  the  emperor  that  no  pope  should  be  cho- 
sen or  consecrated  without  his  consent.  (^)  On  the  emperor's  departure, 
John  returned  and  took  a  most  cruel  vengeance  on  his  enemies,  but  he  was 
soon  after  found  dead  in  an  adulterous  bed,  slain  as  was  generally  believed 
by  the  devil.  The  succeeding  popes  were  nominated  and  with  groat  difficulty 
sustained  by  the  emperor,  against  the  hatred  of  the  people  and  the  doceitftil 
policy  of  the  Tuscan  party.  After  Otho's  death  (978),  Crescentiu*^  a  grand- 
son of  Theodora,  under  the  character  of  a  Consul,  armed  the  Roman  people 
against  the  foreign  tyranny.  Whenever  the  emperors  had  an  army  in  Italy, 
the  popes  were  entirely  subservient  to  their  wDl,  but  at  other  times  they 
were  the  creatures  of  the  Roman  consul  and  people.  Otho  III,^  intending 
to  transfer  the  imperial  residence  to  Rome,  caused  his  young  nephew  Bnino 
to  be  proclaimed  pope,  under  the  name  of  Gregory  V,  (996),  (d)  subdued  the 
fortress  of  St.  Angelo,  and  had  Crescentius  beheaded,  and  a  rival  pope  muti- 
lated (998).  Amulf\  Archbishop  of  Rheims,  and  a  natural  brother  of  the 
Duke  of  Lorraine,  had  surrendered  Rheims  to  this  relative,  and  had  after- 
wards fallen  into  the  hands  of  Ilugh  Capet,  his  enraged  king.  He  refused  to 
acknowledge  any  one  but  the  pope  as  his  Judge.  But  a  national  synod  at 
Rheims  (991)  compelled  him  to  resign  his  office,  and  placed  Gerbert  in  his 
chair,  (e)  The  pope  issued  sentence  of  excommunication  against  all  who 
acknowledged  the  validity  of  the  acts  of  that  synod.  In  vain  did  Gerbert 
remind  the  people  that  it  was  not  his  own  interest,  but  the  welfare  of  the 
general  Church,  which  w^as  to  be  sacrificed  to  the  caprice  of  an  individual; 
he  was  shunned  as  an  excommunicated  man  by  all  the  inhabitants  of  Rheims, 
and  finally  (996)  he  accepted  the  invitation  of  the  emperor  to  become  the  impe- 
rial tutor.  The  new  French  kingdom  sought  reconciliation  with  the  pope. 
Arnulf  was  reinstated  in  his  former  office  by  another  synod  held  at  Rheims 
(996),  and  even  Robert^  the  king,  submitted  to  a  decision  of  a  Roman  synod 
(998),  by  which  he  was  separated  from  his  wife  Bertha  on  account  of  a  spiritual 
relationship  and  a  natural  consanguinity  in  the  fourth  degree.  (/)  Soon  after, 
however,  on  the  premature  death  of  Gregory,  Otho  had  his  beloved  teacher 
elected  to  the  vacant  chair,  and  from  personal  regard,  while  proudly  denying 

h)  Oratian :  P.  I.  Dlat  LXIII.  c  8a    Liudp.  VI,  6. 

c)  Liudp.  VI,  6-11.  PtrU  Th.  IV.  p.  298a.  The  Omst  Leonis  VIIL  as  to  ite  essentUI  matter  Is 
trastworthy,  bat  the  form  in  which  it  has  been  known  since  the  11th  cent  is  not  beyond  sosiiidon. 
It  may  be  found  in  PerU  Th.  IV.  IL  p.  167.  as  an  extract  in  GraUan  :  P.  I.  DIst  LXIII.  c  88.— 
C.  F.  ITtrtely  de  Ottonis  M.  Ecclesiao  prospiciendi  conatu.  Mngd.  ITSd.    d)  Jaffi,  p.  889fla. 

e)  Gerbert's  account  of  the  tranMctions  in  Mansi  Th.  XIX.  p.  lOSsa. 

/)  Mami  Th.  XIX.  p.  225.  UelgaJdua  Floriac.  ViU  Robcrti  c.  IT.  (Bouquet  Th.  X.  pw  lOT.) 
The  view  entertained  in  the  next  century  may  bo  found  in  PeL  Damiani  L  IL  £p.  1& 


CHAP.  L    PAPAOY.    1 17&    BYL7ESTEB  IL    §179.    CLEMENT  IL  191 

the  T&liditj  of  all  former  grants,  be  presented  to  St.  Peter  eight  conntios  be- 
longing to  the  States  of  the  Church  as  if  they  were  his  own.  (g)  Sylvester 
IL  (999-1003)  was  of  a  yery  bumble  origin,  and  in  early  life  bad  been  a 
strenuous  opponent  of  papal  assumptions.  Ilis  elevation  and  his  knowledge 
seemed  so  extraordinary,  that  the  reverence  of  the  Germans  and  the  aversion 
of  the  Bomans  produced  a  report  that  be  had  sold  his  soul  to  the  devil  as  the 
price  of  the  papacy.  But  in  the  midst  of  the  bighest  youthful  aspirations 
the  emperor  suddenly  died  (1002),  and  the  power  of  his  favorite  pope  was 
broken.  (A) 

§  179.     The  Papacy  until  the  Synod  of  Sutri, 

L  Ji^  Begceta  p.  851-851  Glaber  Radvl/ua,  a  monk  of  Clngnl  (abont  1046),  Hist  snl  tem- 
psria.  {Du  Chstns  Tb.  IV.  p.  1.)  Amiao,  Biahop  of  Satri  and  Piaccnza,  d.  1089,  L.  ad  amic.  &  de 
pcneeatione  Eoc.  (Otfdii  Scrr.  rer.  Bolcar.  Tb.  IL  p.  794.)  In  and  after  the  fifth  book  tliore  is  a 
fafatorx  (^  the  Pop«a  from  Benedict  IX.  to  Greg.  VII.  Detiderius  (  Victor  III.)  de  miracu]is  a  S. 
Benedkto  alUfqae  Casinensib.  gestis  Diall.  (BibL  PP.  Lugd.  Tb.  XYIII.  p.  858.)  Annolea  Romani 
from  1046.  {Pert»  Th.  TIL  p.  468.) 

IL  Xnffelhardt,  Obea.  de  syn.  Satrien»L  Eriang.  1834.  4.  Th.  MitOer^  de  scbism.  in  £cc  Bom.  sab 
pootil  Ben.  IX  Tar.  188S.— 6t4m««l,  Qeach.  DeutBcbL  anter  d.  friink.  Kaisem.  Lpz.  1827. 

In  Rome  the  contest  was  still  continued  between  a  popular  party  and  the 
Count  of  Tusculum,  in  whose  family  the  papacy  had  become  hereditary  after  the 
time  of  Benedict  VIIL  (1012.)    Benedict  IX.  reached  the  sacred  chair  (1088) 
when  be  was  yet  a  boy,  disgraced  it  by  crimes  whicb  are  usually  impractica- 
ble at  such  a  youthful  period  of  life,  and  finally  was  driven  from  it  by  the 
people.    Syhester  IIL  was  put  in  his  place,  but  Benedict  was  soon  after 
VroQgbt  back  between  the  swords  of  his  party.    Convinced,  however,  that 
it  would  be  impossible  to  sustain  himself  against  the  popular  contempt,  the 
tiara  was  sold  to  Gregory  YI.    The  latter  regarded  the  disgrace  of  acquiring 
the  papal  crown  in  this  manner  as  a  necessary  sacrifice  for  the  deliverance 
of  the  Church.    Benedict,  however,  soon  repented  of  this  transaction,  and 
three  popes  shared  the  Church  between  themselves.    Ilenry  III.  now  came 
to  restore  the  imperial  power  in  Italy,  and  assembled,  in  the  very  midst  of 
lu8  army,  tbe  Synod  of  Sutri  (1046),  by  whicb  the  papal  chair  was  pro- 
nonnoed  vacant.    Gregory  having  deposed  himself,  Suidger,  Bishop  of  Bam- 
berg, a  serious  and  pious  German  belonging  to  the  imperial  retinue,  was  then 
alnted  as  Pope  in  the  Church  of  St.  Peter,  under  the  name  of  Clement  II. 
rrom  the  hands  of  the  newly  elected  pope  the  Gorman  king  received  the 
crown  of  the  Roman  Emperor^  and  was  made  the  Patricius  of  the  city, 
md  the  Romans  swore  once  more  that  no  pope  should  be  chosen  contrary  to 
hiswilL 

§  180.     The  Popes  under  Hildebrand,  1048-1073. 

L  Amifo,  D^ideriua^  and  AnnaUs  Rom,  as  referred  to  in  tbe  preceding  section.  Leo  Ostien- 
•^  Oudlnal  Bishop  of  Ostia,  1101,  Cbron.  monasterii  Cssinens.  {Muratori  Tb.  IV.  p.  151.)  These 
*ere  tlM>roagh  admirers  of  Gregory.  Many  notices  may  be  found  in  tbe  epistles  of  the  Cardinal 
Bbbop  of  Ostla,  Damiani^  d.  1072,  who  essentially  agreed  with  Ilildebrand,  bat  with  all  bis  con- 


9)  Ottenii  III.  Diploma.  (Baron,  ail  ann.  1191.  Na  67.)  comp.  Liudpr.  Hist  OUon.  c.  19. 
*)  Mrtiui  Th.  XIX  p.  2408a.— <7.  F.  Uock,  Oerbert  o.  8ylv.  II.  u.  si  Jahrh.  Vienna.  1837.    WU- 
■all  JshrbHeber  d.  Deatseben  Eeichs  antor  Otto  IIL  BerL  ISIO.    Jc^  Begesta  p.  845i& 


192  MEDIAEVAL  CHUBCH  HI8T0BT.    FEB.  OL    A.  B.  80a-1916i 

tnMtad  rlews  was  indcpendentif  opfXMcd  to  wlut  he  called  the  bolj  SaUn  nod  the  whtrie  papaej. 
Annalea  AUahen$eSy  restored  by  W.  Giesebrccbt  Berl  1S41. 

II.  Joh.  Voigt,  Hildebr.  als.  Grog.  YII.  u.  8.  Zelultcr.  Weim.  (1815.)  1848.    G.  CasMndtr,  d. 
Zeitalter  Ulldebr.  far  a.  gcgen  ibn.  DarineL  1848.-/7^^,  duatsche  Piipetc.  %  Abth. 

The  popes  of  this  period  were  dependent  upon  the  emperor,  bnt  they 
were  generally  men  selected  for  that  station  on  acconnt  of  their  ecclesiasti- 
cal character,  and  from  the  fact  that  as  general  bishops  of  the  empire,  hon- 
orably and  secarely  residing  at  Rome,  they  had  attained  a  high  degree  of 
ecclesiastical  influence.  The  general  voice  of  the  people  demanded  of  them  the 
deliverance  of  the  Church  from  the  simony  and  the  licentiousness  of  the  clergy. 
The  bishoprics  were  regularly  and  sometimes  at  auction  set  up  for  sale,  and  the 
bishops  sought  remuneration  for  the  expense  of  their  purchase  from  the  sale  of 
the  inferior  offices.  The  whole  Church  had  become  venal.  What  had  been  ob- 
tained by  worldly  policy  was  administered  and  enjoyed  in  a  worldly  manner. 
The  power  of  Henry  111,  was  so  great  in  Italy,  that  Roman  messengers  were 
sent  to  him  demanding  that  he  would  bestow  on  them  some  one  for  a  pope. 
At  the  Diet  of  Worms,  Bruno,  Bishop  of  Toul,  a  cousin  of  the  emperor,  was 
elected  to  that  office,  and  under  the  name  of  Leo  IX,  (1048-54)  proved  him- 
self a  pious  man,  but  somewhat  dependent  upon  those  who  surrounded  him. 
A  Roman  monk,  whom  he  was  desirous  of  making  one  of  his  retinue,  re- 
fused all  connection  with  him  because  he  had  obtained  his  station  in  the 
Church  not  in  accordance  with  ecclesiastical  laws,  but  by  worldly  power.  In 
compliance  with  the  counsel  of  this  man,  the  pope  went  to  Rome  in  the 
character  of  a  pilgrim,  and  was  there  regularly  elected  by  the  clergy  and 
people  of  the  city.  The  monk  who  had  such  an  influence  over  him  was 
Uildehrand,  lie  was  bom  probably  at  Saona,  the  son  of  a  mechanic,  was 
educated  at  Clugni,  and  had  shared  the  exile  of  Gregory  YI.  in  Germany. 
Leo  sought  in  the  national  councils  of  France  and  Germany  to  re-establish 
discipline,  and  to  remove  all  those  priests  who  had  purchased  their  offices 
and  would  not  perform  penance  for  their  sin.  In  a  campaign  against  the 
Normans  who  had  conquered  Apulia,  his  whole  army  was  finally  destroyed. 
But  when  the  imprisoned  vicegerent  of  Christ  beheld  the  conquerors  at  his 
feet,  he  blessed  their  arms  and  confirmed  their  conquests,  (a)  When  Leo 
died,  nildebrand,  then  a  subdeacon,  was  commissioned  by  the  Roman  people 
to  select  a  successor,  and  chose  Gebhard,  Bishop  of  Eichstadt,  Victor  IL 
(1055-57).  iP)  This  man,  on  account  of  his  wisdom  and  wealth  as  well  SB 
for  his  consanguinity  and  friondsliip  with  the  emperor,  was  the  most  power- 
ful bishop  in  the  empire.  The  principal  object  aimed  at  in  his  election,  was 
to  break  up  a  party  of  which  he  had  been  the  centi'e,  but  which  had  been 
opposed  to  the  papal  power  over  the  bishops,  and  to  enlist  his  great  personal 
influence  against  those  abuses  which  prevailed  beyond  the  Alps.  Against 
these,  Hildebrand,  when  Legate,  had  so  efiectually  contended,  that  the  con- 
trition of  a  peijured  bishop  before  his  piercing  glance  was  regarded  as  a 
miraculous  influence  upon  the  conscience,  (c)    The  Emperor  Ilenry,  when 

a)  WibertuA,  Bruno^s  Arcbdeaoon  at  Toul,  Vita  Leon.  (3furaU>ri  Th.  IIL  P.  L  p.  2Ta) 
Bishop  of  BefmU  about  1100,  Vita  Leon.  (lb.  P.  IL  p.  84fi.) 

b)  VIU  and  Epp.  in  MctnH  Tb.  XIX.  p.  83& 

c)  According  to  Damlani  Baron,  ad  ann.  1003.  Na  ISml 


CHAP.  L    PAPACY.    S  ISO.  NICHOLAS  II.    ALEXANDER  IL  1  93 

dying,  commended  his  son  to  tlio  protection  of  the  pope,  and  Victor  pro- 
mised that  the  empire  should  be  given  to  the  royal  child,  Henry  IV.    But  a 
new  power  had  recently  been  established  in  Italy,  by  the  marriage  of  God- 
frey of  Lorraine  with  Beatrice,  the  widow  of  the  Marquis  of  Tuscany.     God- 
frey's brother,  Stephen  /X,  was  actuated  by  the  very  spirit  of  the  Reforma- 
tion.    His  phin  of  establishing  a  national  empire  in  Italy,  by  investing  his 
brother  with  the  royal  dignity,  was  defeated  by  his  want  of  decision  or  his  early 
death  (Aug.  2,  1058.)  (</)    The  Roman  nobles,  with  a  party  of  the  clergy  op- 
posed to  the  Reformation,  placed  upon  the  throne  the  Bishop  of  Veletri,  Bene- 
dict X.     Hildebrand,  Vfith  the  concurrence  of  the  imperial  court,  then  procured 
the  election  of  Gebhard,  Archbishop  of  Florence,  XicJiuhu  II.  (10u8-Cl.)  {c) 
The  duke  Godfrey  conducted  him  to  Rome,  and  Benedict  submitted.     At  a 
Soman  synod  (1059),  Nicholas  committed  almost  exclusively  to  the  college 
of  cardinals  the  power  of  choosing  the  pope,  in  order  that  the  papal  election 
might  not  be  disturbed  by  the  factious  interests  of  the  nobles,  or  the  storms 
of  popular  elections.    The  right  of  King  Henry  and  of  his  successors  (which, 
however,  he  would  have  obtained   personaUy  from  the  apostolic  Fee)  was 
made  the  subject  of  special  stipulation.  (/)    The  Roman  court  perceived  the 
advantage  of  an  alliance  with  the  Normans  in  opposition  to  tlie  (iermanj?,  and 
it  a^eed  with  the  piety  and  policy  of  Eohert  Guiscanl  to  have  his  conquests 
in  Lower  Italy  and  his  designs  upon  Sicily  pronounced  lawful  and  holy  by 
tli«  pope.    He  now  became,  accordingly,  the  vassal  and  protector  of  the  Ro- 
man Church.  (jTf)    By  his  assistance  the  offended  nobility,  and  especially  the 
faction  of  the  Count  of  Tusculum,  was  overthrown.   On  the  death  of  Nicholas, 
H'ddubrand,  in  connection  with  the  cardinals,  made  choice  of  Anselm,  Bishop 
of  Lucca,  Alexander  II,  (1061-78).    The  imperial  court  regarded  the  alliance 
with  ihe  Normans  with  much  uneasiness,  and  therefore  induced  the  Lombardic 
bbhopa  to  proclaim  Cadolaus,  Bishop  of  Parma,  Honorius  II.,  as  pope,  whose 
previous  life  gave  suflScient  assurance  that  the  Church  would  be  protected  against 
simony  and  concubinage.     But  Godfrey  drew  his  sword,  and  the  Normans  were 
tfrayed  in  defence  of  the  pope  chosen  by  Hildebrand,  and  when  Ilanno, 
Archhishop  of  Cologne,  carried  off"  the  person  of  the  German  king,  then  in 
Iiii  minority,  that  he  might  take  upon  himself  the  regency,  Honorius  was 
generally  abandoned.     The  work  of  reformation,  however,  produced  but 
Me  result  in  the  Church  in  consequence  of  the  opposition  of  the  bishops, 
snpported  by  the  king.    Henry  IV.  was  desirous  of  a  divorce  from  his  noble 
but  much-abused  wife.    The  Cardinal  Damiani,  at  a  synod  held  at  Mentz,  so 
frightened  the  bishops  when  they  seemed  disposed  to  favor  the  royal  recjuest, 
tliat  they  dared  not  comi)ly.     When  the  Saxons  sent  messengers  to  Rome  as 
to  a  divine  court,  to  complain  of  Henry  IV.  for  his  intolerable  oppression  of 
^  subjects,  and  for  exposing  to  sale  all  ecclesiastical  offices  to  raise  a  revo- 
Bue  for  the  support  of  soldiers  employed  against  his  i)eople,  Alexander  sum- 
D»ned  the  king  to  answer  tlie  charges  at  Rome.    Henry's  wrath  at  so  strange 


^  Leo  orient.  11,100m. 
<)TiUftnd  Epp.  in  Jfanti  Th.  XIX.  p.  867. 

/)  suttitam  de  electione  Papae.  Parts  Tb.  IV.  2.  p.  176.    A  falsified  text  in  Gratian :  V.  L 
*«.  IXIII.  c  -L—K  CuniU  de  NIc.  IL  decreto.  Argent  8S7.  4. 
f)  Both  feodal  oaths  are  to  be  seen  in  Baron,  ad  aon.  1069.  No.  70s. 

18 


I 


194  MEDIAEVAL  CnURCn  HISTORY.    PEE.  III.    A.  D.  800-121«. 

a  proceeding  was  soon  after  allayed  by  the  sndden  news  of  Alexander's  death. 
It  was  then  that  Ilildebrand  felt  that  the  time  had  come  in  which  he  might 
enter  npon  the  execution  of  the  plan  for  which  he  had  long  been  preparing, 
and  might  assume  the  dignity  of  an  independent  sovereign.  Even  at  the 
funeral  of  Alexander,  the  people  exclaimed,  "  Hildebrand  is  Pope,  St.  Peter 
has  elected  him !  " 

§  181.     Gregory  VIL  April  22,  1073— i/ay  26,  1085. 

I.  1)  Gregoril  Rogristri  &  Epp.  1.  XI.  Tho  lOtb  book  is  wanting  in  all  the  ediit  hitherto,  m  in 
MnnH  Th.  XX.  p.  60f«.  According  to  tlic  invcstigaUons  of  Giesebrecht  on  the  basis  of  the  Cod. 
Vaticanns  the  Registrum  is  not  the  offlcUl  record  of  Oregory^s  writings,  but  the  first  seven  books  are 
a  collection  which  a  contemporary  f<>nned  fh>m  them  corresponding  to  tho  seven  first  years  of  hb 
public  administration.  Tlie  Sth  book,  which  was  not  until  a  later  period  divide<1  according  to  the 
years  of  his  reign,  contain.*)  all  his  other  writings  afterwards  found,  compiled  without  a  strict  regard 
to  their  chronological  order.  Thus,  «A//??,  Regesta  p.  402-443.  Acts  of  council  A  orlp.  docc  :  ManH 
Th.  XX.  p.  402sa.  and  in  Uldarici  Bahenherg.  Codex  Epist  collected  about  1125.  {Eccard.  Th.  11. 
p.  1.)  2)  Panegyrists:  Bonizo  and  others  referred  to  at  the  head  of  {  179s.  Paultis  Bemridtn 
«t«,  canon  at  Ratisbon,  about  1130,  de  Vita  Greg.  {Jfuratori  Th.  III.  P.  I.  p.  817.)  Bmno^  a  Saxon 
clergyman.  Hist  belli  Saxon.  1078-91.  {Freher.  Th.  I.  p.  171.)  The  biographies  of  Pundulph  of  Pi»a^ 
an<l  yicolas  of  Aragon,  for  the  sake  of  the  original  authorities  preserved  in  them.  {Jfitrtttori  Th, 
III.  P.  I.  p.  804.)  8;  Opponents:  Benno,  a  Cardinal  of  the  party  of  Clement  III.  the  Antipope,  de 
vita  et  gcstis  Hildebr.  1.  IL  Otbert,  Bishop  of  Liege,*  de  vita  et  obitu  Ilenr.  lY.  (Both  are  in  Gol- 
dntitVs  Apologia  pro  Ilenr.  IV.  Han.  1611.  4.)  Concerning  fhigments  of  another  adverse  writer: 
Peru  Archiv.  vol.  V.  p.  85.  Among  the  Panegyrists  the  praise  is  unqualified,  but  although  Paul  of 
Bemr.  writes  as  an  independent  man,  and  Bruno  passionately  when  in  opposition  to  the  emperor, 
they  express  the  sentiment  of  a  whole  nation.  On  the  same  side  are  also  found  some  impartial 
chroniclers,  as  Lambert,  Marianus  Scotus,  Otto  of  Freysingen,  and,  respecting  the  character  of  Or^« 
ory,  even  Sigbert    On  the  other  hand,  Benno's  work  is  nothing  but  a  lampoon  Aili  of  contradictions. 

II.  Gaah^  Apol.  Greg.  Tfib.  1792.    Yoigt  and  Cassander  referred  to  at  the  head  of  %  IPO.    A,  d§ 
Vidaillin,  Vie  de  Gr<:'goire  VIL  Par.  1887,  %Th.    J,  W.  Botoden,  Life  of  Gregory  VIL  Lond.  18I0L 

2  Th.— So//Z,  Ileinrich  IV.  Munich.  1828.  Verenet,  de  commutatione,  quam  subiit  liierarchia  Rom. 
auctore  Greg.  Tr^j.  ad  Rh.  1882.  \J.  SUphent^  Ilildebrand,  or  Greg.  VII.  (in  Ed.  Review,  Jan.  lS45i 
and  Eclectic  Mag.  June,  1845).] 

That  he  might  not  be  embarrassed  with  an  antipope,  Gregor}-  VII.  asked 
the  consent  of  the  king  to  his  assumption  of  the  tiara.  Henry  lY.,  deceived 
by  the  humility  and  frankness  exhibited  in  his  letter,  readily  granted  what 
it  would  have  been  difficult  to  withhold.  No  doubt  Gregory  secretly  desired  the 
possession  of  the  papal  crown,  but  the  same  feehng  which  even  at  a  lat^r  period, 
in  the  midst  of  a  stormy  activity,  made  him  sometimes  tired  of  the  hostility 
of  the  world,  and  long  for  retirement,  for  ho  was  a  sickly  man,  now  made 
him  shrink  from  the  struggle  in  which  he  foresaw  he  must  engage  in  opposition 
to  the  clergy,  the  bishops,  and  even  thlb  king,  if  be  would  radically  heal  the 
maladies  of  the  Church.  The  marriages  of  the  clergy,  contracted  with  a 
consciousness  of  guilt,  and  generally  of  a  dissolute  character,  were  the  most 
universal  cause  of  their  corruption.  It  was  necessary,  therefore,  that  mar- 
riage should  be  freely  conceded  to  them,  or  be  rendered  utterly  impracti- 
cable. At  a  synod  held  at  Rome  (1074),  Gregory  re-established  the  ancient 
law  of  celibacy.  The  largest  portion  of  the  inferior  clergy  in  Lombardy  and 
beyond  the  Alps  were  indignant  at  this.  It  was,  however,  only  by  renounc- 
ing the  delights  and  cares  of  domestic  life  that  the  clergy  could  secure  the 
independence  of  the  Church,  and  yet  retain  possession  of  her  vast  estates. 
By  exciting  the  common  people  against  all  married  priests,  the  papal  law  pre- 
vailed in  spite  of  their  desperate  opposition.    A  second  Roman  synod  (1075) 


CHAP.  L    PAPACY.    S 181-  QBEGOBY  VIL  195 

pranonsoed  the  decisive  sentence  by  whicli  all  simony  was  condemned,  and 
the  freedom  of  the  Church  was  declared,  since  every  one  was  laid  nnder  ex- 
eommanication  who  should  give  or  receive  an  ecclesiastical  office  from  the 
hands  of  a  layman.    The  kings,  in  opposition  to  this,  defended  a  long  estab- 
lished prerogative  which  was  a  powerful  support  to  their  thrones.    In  the 
mind  of  Gregory  the  idea  of  a  universal  theocracy  had  become  ascendant,  in 
which  a  vicar  of  God  in  times  of  brute  violence  (faustrecht)  might  stand 
between  princes  and  their  people,  enforcing  the  law  of  divine  right  by  his 
spiritual  power,  and  able  either  to  humble  the  people  or  to  depose  i)rinces. 
As  the  canse  of  the  papacy  was  then  believed  to  be  identical  with  that  of 
general  reformation,  and  all  felt  the  necessity  of  a  supi'eme  moral  power 
when  soch  lawless  violence  prevailed,  and  of  a  legitimate  dominion  of  the 
spiritnal  over  the  merely  physical  nature,  of  which  the  state  was  regarded 
as  the  representative,  tlie  best  portion  of  society  were  &vorable  to  this  view. 
Many,  however,  saw  the  necessary  result  of  intrusting  such  unlimited  power 
to  the  hand  of  a  man.  (a)    Gregory  never  lost  an  opportunity  as  a  feudal 
lord  paramount,  and  as  an  umpire  or  lawgiver,  to  assert  with  greater  or  less 
mecess  his  8lSoe  of  a  divine  vicar  among  the  nations  of  Europe.    His  princi- 
ples he  openly  and  boldly  avowed,  (b)  however  carefifl  and  reserved  he 
nnght  be  in  expressing  opinions  of  particular  persons ;  but  in  the  accomplish- 
ment of  his  porposes  he  never  hesitated,  if  necessary,  to  make  use  of  the 
most  terrible  measures.    He  gathered  around  himself  men  of  vigorous  and 
elevated  minda,  whom  he  raised  often  against  their  own  wills  from  monastic 
eoneealment  to  ftte  highest  dignities.    Beatrice  and  her  daughter  Matilda, 
Countess  of  Tuscany,  always  participated  in  his  most  secret  counsels.    The 
mpieions  which  some  attempted  to  throw  upon  his  relations  to  the  former 
kdy,  were  too  convenient  for  the  purposes  of  the  thousands  whose  inclina- 
tioDs  he  opposed,  to  acquire  any  high  degree  of  probability  when  opposed  to 
fte  uniform  character  of  the  parties,  (c)    More  credible  evidences  show  that 
tbe  relation  was  that  of  an  earnest  father  to  his  spiritual  daughter,  who  did 
boBuge  to  his  lofty  spirit,  and  was  delighted  when  he  intrusted  to  her  his 
ores,  and  allowed  her  to  as^st  him  with  her  wealth  and  power.    Gregory 
VIS  indeed  hated  by  the  clergy  and  the  principal  men  of  Italy,  but  on 
ChriBtmas  night  in  the  year  1074,  the  people  delivered  him  out  of  the  hands 
of  the  youth  among  the  nobility,  who  had  formed  a  conspiracy  and  threat- 
ened his  life.    His  ofHuion  that  Spain  by  an  ancient  legal  title  belonged  to 
fit  Peter,  and  that  Hungary  had  formerly  been  given  to  St.  Peter  by  one  of 
iti  kings,  Just  as  Saxony  was  said  to  have  been  given  by  the  Emperor  Charles, 
v^emained  only  as  an  idea  founded  upon  a  legendary  tradition  to  be  taken  up 
^  any  one  who  mi^t  afterwards  have  the  power  to  act  upon  the  sug- 


<)  ApolofU  pro  Henr.  IT.  1098,  wrttten  probablf  by  Waltram^  Bishop  of  Naomborg,  and  a  Tnct 
^  iar«itftara  Eplscc  bf  the  same.  Besides  other  Apologists  in  Goldast  Theodorici.  Ep.  ad 
^  a  1090.  (^Martene  Tb^anr.  dot.  Anecdot  Th.  L  p.  214ss.)  For  Gregor. :  Bemold,  Constant 
^9<iepi.  pro  decretis  Orrg.  (Jfanti  Th.  XX.  p.  404)  Letters  and  Pamphlets:  Ut^ermann  Tb.  IL 
^I^  Anitdmu*,  Bp.  of  Lucca,  contra  Ouibertam  Antipapam  i.  IL  a.  1064  (BibL  PP.  Lagd.  Th. 
^UI  pi  602.)    Others  In  Oreiser,  ApoL  pro  Greg.  (0pp.  Tb.  VL) 

^)  ^  as  a  collection  by  another  baod,  oompL  DtcUtna  GregorH  VIZ  (L.  IL  Epu  6K.  Matui  Th. 


1%  MEDIAEVAL  CHURCH  HISTOEY.    PEE.  IH.    A,  D.  800-121«. 

gestion.  (//)  If  he  sometimes  made  concessions  when  great  power  and  tal- 
ents were  arrayed  against  him,  as  when  Philip  of  France^  and  still  more, 
wiien  WdVuim  the  Conqueror  of  England  resisted  his  measures,  it  was  be- 
cause his  extraordinary  knowledge  of  political  affairs  enabled  him  to  judge 
how  far  he  might  venture,  and  made  him  see  the  necessity  of  using  worldly 
means  in  worldly  transactions.  But  even  when  yielding  to  necessity,  he 
openly  avowed,  that  just  as  God  had  patience  with  the  wickedne&s  of  man, 
ho  endured  injustice  only  for  the  present  in  the  hope  of  a  future  meliora- 
tion. (<»)  The  impetuous  instability  of  the  youthful  Henry  IV.,  who  had  been 
invested  with  the  purple  even  from  his  birth,  hadjbeen  educated  without  disci- 
pline, and  lived  ever  afterwards  without  affection,  presented  a  fair  mark  for  his 
terrible  and  cool  precision.  In  opposition  to  this  prince,  Gregory  went  forward 
reforming  the  Church  and  exalting  the  papacy,  and  finally  he  beheld  the 
highest  of  all  earthly  powers  humbled  before  it.  When  the  trade  in  eccle- 
siastical ofBces  was  persisted  in  at  court,  and  those  counsellors  who  had  been 
excommunicated  on  this  account  were  reinstated ;  when  Henry's  paramours 
went  about  adorned  with  jewels  taken  from  the  sacred  vessels,  and  the  Sax- 
ons endured  the  most  horrible  oppression,  the  pope  demanded  That  the  king 
should  answer  for'these  things  at  Rome,  and  threatened  him  with  excommu- 
nication on  his  disobedience.  At  a  synod  held  at  Worms  (Jan.  24,  1076), 
the  king  had  the  pope  deposed  as  a  tyrant  who  had  laid  unhallowed  hands 
upon  the  Lord's  anointed.  Gregory  replied  by  hurling  against  him  an  anath- 
ema which  absolved  all  Christians  from  their  oath  of  allegiance  to  him.  By 
his  violent  proceedings  Henry  had  already  fallen  out  with^ie  princes  of  his 
court,  so  that  they  hated  him  more  than  they  valued  the  independence  of  the 
empire.  They  therefore  resolved,  at  an  assembly  held  at  Trihur  (Oct.  1076), 
that  if  the  ban  of  excommunication  were  not  removed  from  Henry  within  a 
year,  he  should  forfeit  his  throne.  With  a  broken  spirit  the  monarch  ob- 
tained absolution  (Jan.  28,  1077),  after  he  had  brought  disgrace  upon  himself 
and  his  kingdom  at  Canossa.  Finally  he  seized  those  weapons  which  had 
long  been  offered  him  by  the  nobles  of  Lombardy.  Again  the  sentence  of 
excommunication  and  deposition  was  issued  against  him,  a  rival  pope  and  a 
rival  king  were  set  up,  and  Italy  and  Germany  were  filled  with  blood. 
Gregory  had  predicted  that  in  that  year  a  false  king  should  die,  (/)  and  ac- 
cordingly Rudolph  of  Svvabia,  whom  he  had  himself  made  king,  died  (1080). 
Henry  besieged  and  took  Rome  (1084),  but  the  pope  in  his  castle  of  St. 
Angelo  would  even  then  accept  of  nothing  but  the  unconditional  submis- 
sion of  the  king,  and  was  liberated  by  Robert  Guiscard.  But  the  Romanic 
nations  commended  the  king's  cause,  (g)  and  the  Romans  were  tired  of  the 
evils  which  the  implacable  spirit  of  the  pope  brought  upon  them.  Gregory 
withdrew  himself  from  them  with  his  Normans,  and  died  at  Salerno,  with  the  feel- 
ings of  a  martyr,  though  binding  and  loosing  his  fellow-men  even  in  death,  (h) 


d)  Kegtetr.  IV,  28.  II,  18.  VIII,  28.    Desgl.  Corsica  V,  4. 

e)  E.  g.  tho  cnfeoflfment  of  Gal»card  in  Mansi  Th.  XX.  p.  814. 

/)  Sigb.  Gembl.  ad  ann.  1080.    Bonlzo's  attempt  to  jurtify  this  proceeding  is  therefore  about  as 
absurd  as  Benno's  accusation  of  witchcraft    g)  Registr.  VII,  8. 

h)  The  falsehood  which  fh>m  fear  of  the  power  <rf  the  deceased  pope  was  iiiTented,  may  be  fbond  in 


CHAP.  I.    PAPACY.    $  182.  VICTOR  III.    UP.BAN  II.  197 

§  182.     Gregory's  Sucressors,  1085-1009. 

Victor  III  1(>S5-S7.  JIunn  Th.  XX.  p.  630ss.  Lfo  Ostienn.  see  at  llie  liead  of  §  180.  Blogr.  by 
Fandulpkut  Putan.  and  Bernard.  Guidon^  written  during  the  18th  c.nt.  In  MuratoH  Th.  Ill:  P. 
Lp.  ^\.— Urban  JL  lOSS-W.  Mami  Th.  XX.  p.  (A2»k  t/i//<?,  p.  44Ss5.  Pandulph.  and  Ber- 
nard, in  Jifuratori  I.  c.  After  and  along  with  the  sources:  Ruinart  In  MahiUon  et  Ruin.  0pp. 
posth.  Par.  1724.  4,  Among  the  ch^onicle^^  especially  Iao  0«iiena^  &  Bernold^  monk  of  9.  Bla- 
■kx  Chron.  1065-1100.  (Perta  Th.  VII.  p.  aS5.) 

Gregory's  principle  were  deeply  impressed  upon  the  age  in  which  ho 
lived,  and  the  clergy  hegan  to  understand  the  advantages  they  acquired  by 
sacrificing  their  domestic  enjoyments.     Those  who  had  been  selected  by 
Gregory  as  worthy  to  become  his  successors  were  one  after  another  raised  to 
the  apostolic  chair.     Desideritis^  the  Abbot  of  Montecassino,  Victor  III.^ 
resolutely  refused  to  leave  the  retirement  of  his  convent,  and  thereby  seri- 
ously impaired  his  influence,  but  he  rigidly  followed  out  the  course  on  which 
his  illustrioas  Mend  had  entered.    On  his  premature  death,  Otho^  who  out 
of  disgust  with  the  world  had  resigned  his  canonicate  at  Rheims  and  betaken 
himself  to  Clugni,  where  he  had  been  noticed  by  Gregory  and  madeJBishop 
of  Ostia,  and  afterwards  as  Legate  had  been  the  prisoner  and  the  mortal 
enemy  of  Henry,  became  pope  under  the  name  of  Urhaii  IT,    When  Gre- 
gory was  dead,  the  emperor,  who  had  now  attained  maturity  in  the  midst  of 
the  storms  through  which  he  had  passed,  with  his  pope  Clement  III.  exer- 
dsed  sovereignty  over  Upper  and  Central  Italy.    Renouncing  her  widowhood 
that  she  might  promote  the  interests  of  the  Romish  Church,  Matild<i^  by  her 
upparent  marrifi^e  with  Welf,  Duke  of  Bavaria,  gave  for  a  brief  period  a 
military  leader  to  the  papal  party.    The  conduct  of  the  emperor  was  far 
more  effectual  than  were  all  the  solicitations  of  the  pope  to  drive  his  son 
Conrad  into  acts  of  treason  (1093).     Urban,  at  the  great  Council  of  Cler- 
fM%t  (1095),  excommunicated  Philip  of  France  for  his  adulterous  connec- 
tion  with  the  Countess  Bertrade,  and  forbade  all  persons  invested  with 
ecclesiastical  offices  taking  an  oath  of  allegiance  to  a  layman.      In  conse- 
quence of  the  crusades,  the  pope  not  only  obtained  an  enthusiastic  army 
for  the  execution    of  his  plans,  but  his  moral  influence  was  so  much  in- 
creased that  he  became  the  head  of  all  the  popular  movements  of  the  West- 
em  world.    Philip  was  compelled  to  give  up  his  paramour,  and  Henry  and 
his  pope  lost  all  power  in  Itiily.    Urban,  however,  purchased  nothing  but  the 
precious  friendship  of  the  Normans,  and  preserved  nothing  but  the  shadow 
of  his  ecclesiastical  claims  in  the  aj)pointnient  of  Count  Roger  owiihh  suc- 
c^Bors  to  be  the  perpetual  legates  of  the  pope  in  Sicily  (MonarcLia  Siciliae).* 


*J*.  OembL  ann.  1085.  The  troth  may  bo  wen  in  PauL  Bemrid.  c  lOSsa.  Respecting  Gregory's 
ODOBlzatioo  and  the  opposition  made  to  it  by  the  courts:  L'avocat  du  Dlable,  ou  mumoires  sor  la 
»<•«  w  U  Idgende  da  P.  Greg.  VII.  1748.  8  Th. 

•  JlanH  Th.  XX.  p.  «5».    Ganfredi  Jfalaterra  lllst  Slcala  IV,  29.  (Afuratori  Th.  V.  p.  601.) 
^^I>»Piny  Defence  de  la  monarchie  de  Sicile  contre  ies  entreprises  de  la  Coar  de  Rome.  Amst 


198  MEDIAEYAL  CIIUKCH  lUSTOBT.    FEB.  IIL    A.  D.  800-1210. 

"§  183.     The  Crusades.     Conquest  of  Jerusalem. 

L  Collections:  J.  £ongara,  Oesta  Dei  per  Francos  Hanov.  1611.  2  Th.  C  SchUier,  hist  Memoir 
Abtk  1.  vol.  1-a    J.  Michaud,  Bibliotheque  des  Croisadea.  Par.  1S8Q.  4  Tb. 

II.  F.  Wilken^  Gesch.  d.  Kreuzz.  Lpz.  1807-82.  7  vols.  Michaud,  Hist  des  Crolsadey.  Par.  1S12. 
ed.  &  \hV)f%.  6  vols.  [Jf*oAa«(r«  II.  of  the  C^a8ade^  transl.  by  Wm.  Bobaon,  Loud.  1S52.  8  vols,  n.] 
n.  %.  Sybel,  Oesch.  d.  ereten  Kreuzz.  Doss.  1&41.  [7!  KeighUey,  The  Crufadera,  Lend.  1S52. 12.  C. 
MiU,  11.  of  the  Crusades.  Pbilad.  1S15.  G.  P.  S,  Jamea,  Chivalry  and  tbft  Crusades.  New  York. 
1837.  Eclectic  Mag.  April,  1S4&] 

The  attraction  toward  the  Holy  Land  which  had  formerly  prerailed  in 
the  Clmrch  had  never  been  interrupted,  but  in  consequence  of  the  ardent 
and  sensuous  devotion  which  was  almost  universal  in  the  eleventh  century, 
it  then  became  especially  powerful.  German  bishops  with  their  soldiers 
heroically  defended  themselves  against  a  sudden  attack  of  the  Saracens  which 
took  place  on  Easter,  1065.  (a)  Even  before  this  (999),  Sylvester  II.,  in  the 
name  of  the  desolate  Holy  City,  had  called  upon  the  general  Church  for  aid. 
Cregory  (1074)  once  entertained  serious  thoughts  of  becoming  leader  of  a  host 
for  the  liberation  of  the  Christian  portion  of  the  East.  (&)  When  the  Se\ju- 
kian  Turks  had  established  their  empire  in  Asia  Minor,  and  had  conquered 
Syria  (after  1078),  the  pilgrims  and  Christians  in  Palestijie  made  bitter  com- 
plaints of  their  intolerable  ill-treatment  there.  Tho  hermit  Peter  of  Amiens 
made  known  the  prayers  of  the  oriental  Christians,  and  announced  an  imme- 
diate commission  from  Christ  for  their  deliverance.  Urban  11.^  at  a  general 
assembly  of  the  Church  at  Clermont  (1095),  earnestly  exhorted  all  to  enter 
upon  this  holy  war  under  a  leader  who  never  wanted  provisions,  and  on 
whose  side  victory  was  certain,  the  reward  was  eternal,  and  death  was  mar- 
tyrdom. All  the  people  shouted,  *^  God  wills  it ! "  (c)  A  hundred  thousand 
men,  chiefly  Frenchmen,  in  tho  first  moments  of  exhilaration  took  upon 
themselves  the  sign  of  the  Cross,  by  which  Christians  were  to  be  known  as 
true  disciples.  Secular  embarrassments  and  passions,  romantic  pleasures  and 
superstitious  hopes,  doubtless  had  much  to  do  in  this,  and  yet  it  must  be  con- 
ceded that  the  spirit  which  animated  these  masses  for  two  hundred  years 
was  something  superior  to  that  of  this  world;  But  it  was  not  for  a  holy 
sepulchre  alone  that  these  expeditions  were  undertaken.  They  had  also  in 
view  the  honor  of  the  Christian  name,  the  triumph  of  oppressed  Cliristianity 
in  the  East,  and  the  dominion  of  Europe  over  Asia.  An  undisciplined  host 
which  followed  the  hermit's  ass,  was  reduced  to  half  its  original  number  in 
passing  through  Bulgaria,  and  finally  was  utterly  destroyed  by  the  Turks. 
When  the  more  disciplined  army  of  the  crusaders  reached  the  plain  of 
Nicaea^  they  found  a  high  pyramid  formed  of  the  bones  of  their  predecessors. 
At  Edessa,  which  voluntarily  surrendered  to  Baldwin,  and  at  Nicaea  and 
Antioch,  which  were  soon  conquered,  the  pilgrim  princes  erected  prineipali- 
ties  for  themselves.  After  indescribable  sufferings,  Jerusalem  was  stormed 
on  the  fifteenth  of  July,  1099,  and  through  blood  and  flames  the  army 
marched  singing  holy  songs  to  the  Church  of  the  Heeurrection.     Godfrey  of 


a)  Lambert  Scha/n.  ad.  ann.  1065. 

b)  SylT€9tri  £p.  a<l.  univ.  £cc  {Bouqnet  Tb.  X.  p.  42«s.>    Gregor.  ad  Ilemr.  E.  (Jfcmai  Th. 
XX  pc  150.) 

c)  JfuMi  Th.  XX.  p.  Snsa.    Bongar*  Th.  L  p.  S6.  81.  SS^m. 


CHAP.  L  PAPACY.  §  184.  PASCAL  IL  HENRY  V.  199 

Bauilhn  was  proclaimed  the  first  king  of  Jerusalem,  although  the  piety  of 
his  heroic  spirit  refused  to  wear  a  royal  crown  where  the  Son  of  God  had 
worn  a  crown  of  thorns. 

§  184.     Pascal  IL,  1099-1118. 

Letters  and  public  documents  in  Manai  Th.  XX.  p.  977.  di5per»ed  in  Uldarici  Cod.  epistolaria. 
Life  by  PandulphuM  and  tbe  Cardinal  of  Aragon^  with  original  dl>cn^)ent^  may  be  found  in  3/u- 
ratori  Th.  IIL  P.  L  p.  8M  and  860.— £1  GertaU,  pollc.  Hist  Deutscbl.  nntcr  Uein.  Y.  and  Lothar. 
IL  L|is.  1S41.  S  Th. 

Foicaly  whom  Gregory  had  taken  from  the  monastery  of  Clugni  and 
made  a  cardinal,  possessed  the  fiery  spirit  without  the  firmness,  and  the  zeal 
for  the  hierarchy  without  the  knowledge  of  its  proper  limits,  which  had  been 
displayed  by  his  patron.    Philip  of  France,  who  had  again  been  exconimu- 
mcated  on  account  of  his  illicit  connection,  received  absolution  on  his  taking 
an  oath  that  he  would  renounce  Bertrade  (1104).    But  when  this  oath  was 
violated  the  pope  took  no  notice  of  the  perjury.    A  violent  contest  sprung 
np  between  Anselm,  Archbishop  of  Canterbury,  in  behalf  of  tlie  pope,  and 
Henry  L  of  EngUtnd,  in  which  the  latter  contended  for  his  crown  and  the 
former  for  his  life.    It  was  finally  compromised  (1106)  by  the  king's  renun- 
dation  of  the  right  of  investiture  with  respect  to  bishops,  though  ho  retained 
the  power  of  exacting  fi*om  them  the  oath  of  allegiance,  (ft)     Henry  TV. 
abdicated  in  favor  of  his  son  who  had  rebelled  against  him,  but  died  (1106) 
under    a    sentence   of  excommunication  which  reached  even  his   lifeless 
corpse.    But  Henry  V.  had  no  sooner  become  settled  in  his  throne,  than  he 
laid  claim  to  tbe  ancient  royal  prerogative  of  investing  bishops  with  the  ring 
and  crosier,  and  to  support  his  claim  he  crossed  the  Alps  with  a  powerful 
anny(lllO).    In  this  extremity,  the  pope  thought  of  purchasing  the  free- 
dom of  the  Church  by  the  sacrifice  of  its  secular  power,  and  accordingly  he 
proposed  to  restore  to  the  king  the  imperial  fiefs  belonging  to  the  bishops,  on 
condition  that  the  episcopal  elections  might  be  free  from  the  royal  interfer- 
ence.   But  the  bishops  and  the  princes  were  terrified  at  the  idea  of  a  con- 
tract by  which  the  power  of  the  Church  would  have  been  temporarily  anni- 
bilated,  and  that  of  the  king  would  have  been  rendered  overwhelming*(J) 
The  execution  of  such  a  compact  would  have  been  practicable  only  by  a 
complete  revolution.    On  the  other  hand,  Henry  had  the  pope  imprisoned, 
and  compelled  him  by  threats  to  place  the  imperial  crown  upon  his  head, 
wlemnly  to  acknowledge  the  king's  right  of  investiture,  and  to  promise 
WTerto  issue  against  him  a  sentence  of  excommunication.  (<r)    The  pope,  how- 
ever, could  not  act  as  a  private  person  in  this  matter,  since  he  stood  as  the 
wpreeentative  of  a    particular  system    of  things.      Pascal  was  therefore 
<>l>liged  to  listen  to  the  most  bitter  reproaches  for  his  treasonable  conduct 
toward  the  Church,  and  at  a  synod  held  at  the  Latcran  (1112),  to  retract  all 
^t  he  had  done.    On  his  refusal  to  excommunicato  the  emperor,  the  sen- 

0)  Letters  of  Anwlnif  his  Life  by  bia  confessor  Eadmer,  and  bis  Historia  novorum  I.  Y L  are  In 
-^wrfwi  Opp.  Par.  1721.  2  Th.  f    F.  R.  Uaue^  Ans.  t.  C.  Lolpz.  1843.  Tli.  1. 
h  PfriM  Th.  IV.  p.  68aa.    Card.  Aragatu  Vita  Paach.  {JfuratoH  p.  860.) 
^)  PertB  Th.lY.^llm. 


A* 


200  MEDIAEVAL  CnURCH  HISTORY.    PEE.  IIL    A.  D.  800-1216L 

tence  was  pronounced  by  his  legates,  {d)  While  Gregory  was  yet  alive,  Ma- 
tilda^ for  the  good  of  her  soul*  had  bequeathed  to  him  all  her  possessions  in 
trust  for  the  Romish  Church,  (e)  At  her  death  (1115)  new  materials  were 
added  to  the  controversy,  since  the  emperor  claimed  her  estates  as  an  impe- 
rial fief,  and  on  the  ground  that  he  was  properly  her  heir  at  law,  while  the 
pope  claimed  them  as  the  inheritance  of  St.  Peter.  The  people  now  began 
to  perceive  that  the  papal  ban  was  launched  against  the  emperor  for  his  do- 
fence  of  the  rights  of  the  empire.  Henry  V.  took  violent  possession  of  tho 
forfeited  fief,  and  drove  the  pope  from  Rome.  The  pontifi^,  however,  was 
restored  to  the  city  by  the  Normans,  and  died  while  making  active  prepara- 
tions for  war. 

§  186.     Caliztuall,  1119-24.     Concordat  of  Worms. 

The  cause  of  the  emperor  in  Rome  was  sustained  principally  by  the  pow- 
erful family  of  the  Frangipani.  Gelaslus  11.^  whom  the  cardinals  elected, 
was  suddenly  attacked  by  persons  belonging  to  that  family,  cruelly  abused, 
and  obliged  to  fly  to  the  friendly  territory  of  France,  where,  after  a 
brief  victory,  he  died  as  early  as  1119.  («)  By  his  advice,  Guido,  Arch- 
bishop of  Vienna,  a  prince  of  the  house  of  Burgundy,  was  chosen  to  be  his 
successor  under  the  name  of  Calixtus  II.  (If)  At  a  synod  held  at  Rheims 
this  pontifl^  renewed  the  sentence  of  excommunication  against  the  emperor, 
whom  he  called  a  second  Judas.  The  imperial  party  in  Rome  had  made 
choice  of  Burdinus,  Archbishop  of  Braga,  Gregory  VIII.,  who  was  over- 
powered by  the  Normans,  was  cruelly  mocked  by  the  Roman  populace,  and 
finally  died  in  the  papal  dungeon,  {c)  Adalbert,  Archbishop  of  Mentz,  for- 
merly the  imperial  counsellor,  and  by  whose  advice  all  the  violent  and  irregu- 
lar proceedings  against  the  pope  had  been  conducted,  was  now  seized  by  the 
hierarchical  spirit,  and  sought  to  renew  the  civil  war  in  Germany.  But  the 
people,  tired  of  the  evils  which  had  been  produced  in  the  empire  during  a 
period  of  fifty  years'  dissension  among  its  rulers,  were  importunate  in  their 
demands  for  peace.  Finally  a  Concordat  was  agreed  upon  at  an  imperial 
Diet  at  Worms  (1122),  on  conditions  similar  to  those  previously  acknow- 
ledged in  France  and  England.  This  was  afterwards  confirmed  at  the  first 
general  council  in  the  Later  an  (1123).  "The  emperor  surrenders  to  God, 
to  St.  Peter  and  Paul,  and  to  the  Catholic  Church,  all  right  of  investiture  by 
ring  and  crosier.  He  grants  that  elections  and  ordinations  in  all  churches 
shall  take  place  fr^ly  in  accordance  with  ecclesiastical  laws.  The  pope 
agrees  that  the  election  of  German  prelates  shall  be  performed  in  the  presence 
of  the  emperor,  provided  it  is  without  violence  or  simony.  In  case  any  elec- 
tion is  disputed,  the  emperor  shall  render  assistance  to  the  legal  party  with 

d)  Baron,  ad.  ann.  1111.  Acta  of  Synod,  Man»i  Th.  XXL  p.  4988.  Planck^  Acta  Inter  Ilenr. 
V.  et  Pascb.  II.  Oott,  1785. 

«)  The  conveyance  of  the  allodial  estate  by  will  is  certain,  but  the  original  document  (Jfuratori 
Th.  V.  p.  884.)  of  1102,  by  which  a  legal  gift  waa  attempted  to  be  conveyed  intor  vlvoe  Is  doubtAiL 
Tiraboachiy  Memorie  Modonese.  Th.  I.  p.  1408a.    L^o,  Italien  vol.  I.  p.  4778a. 

a)  Pandulphi  Puani  Vita  Qelaa.  {Murat  Th.  IIL  P.  I.  p.  867s8.) 

I)  Jaffi^  p.  62788^    Biographies  in  Muratori  Th.  IIL  P.  L  p.  41Saa. 

c)  BaluHuf,  Vita  BurdiuL  (Miacell.  Par.  1680.  L  IIL  p.  471s8.) 


CHAP.  I.    PAPACY.    $186.  AKNOLD  OF  BRESCIA.  201 

the  advice  of  the  archbishop  and  the  bishops.  The  person  elected  is  invest- 
ed with  the  imperial  fiefs  by  the  ro3al  sceptre  pledged  for  the  execntion  of 
every  thing  required  by  law.  Whoever  is  consecrated  shall  also  receive  in 
like  manner  his  investitures  from  other  parts  of  the  empire  within  six 
months."  (</)  Although  in  this  proceeding  the  pope  had  barely  saved  appear- 
ances, and  not  the  reality  of  his  cause,  and  the  strict  hierarchical  party  com- 
plained loudly  of  the  concessions  made,  so  overwhelming  was  the  authority 
of  the  papacy,  that  the  influence  which  the  emperor  had  hitherto  exercised 
in  the  elections  was  gradually  transferred  to  the  pope,  in  spite  of  the  laws  by 
which  their  freedom  was  guaranteed. 

§  186.    Arnold  of  Brescia  and  Bernard  of  Clairtaux. 

J .  D.  Koler^  de  Am.  BrixionsL  Ooeti  1742.  4.    K.  Beck^  Arnold  v.  Br.  (Basl.  Wisa.  Zeitsch.  1824. 
H.  1)    m:  Franke,  Arnold  v.  Br.  a.  9.  Zelt  Zarlch.  1825.    Respecting  Bernard,  see  §  207. 

The  Franconian  imperial  house  became  extinct  on  the  death  of  Henry  V. 
(1125),  and  a  king  chosen  by  suffrages  had  to  purchase  his  new  sovereignty 
from  the  states  of  the  empire  and  from  the  pope.    Lothaire  II,  having  been 
chosen,  received  the  allodial  estates  of  the  Countess  Matilda  from  the  hands 
of  Innocent  IL  (1130-43),  because  she  had  been  the  pope's  vassal,  {a)  The  elec- 
tion of  bishops  was  no  longer  restrained  by  the  presence  of  the  emperor,  and 
the  decisive  question  now  began  to  be  agitated  whether  the  investiture  of 
bishops  should  take  place  before  or  after  ];heir  consecration.  (U)    During  the 
struggles  between  the  imperial  and  papal  governments  a  new  power  had 
sprang  up,  first  in  the  episcopal  cities  of  Lombardy,  from  the  remnants  of  the 
Roman  municipal  constitution.    In  this  was  presented  an  omen  of  a  now  period, 
io  which  independent  cities  were  to  enjoy  their  liberties,  and  constitute  a  third 
estate  in  opposition  to  the  pretensions  of  the  secular  and  spiritual  nobility,  (c) 
Arnold  of  Brescia  embraced  the  extreme  views  connected  with  this  tendency, 
Mid  regarded  the  condition  of  the  apostolic  Church  as  a  law  for  all  pe- 
riods of  the  world.    He  was  a  pupil  of  Abelard,  had  been  a  clergyman  in  his 
Dative  city,  was  rigid  and  abstemious  in  his  rules  of  conduct,  and  taught  that 
the  clergy  ought  to  possess  no  worldly  property,  and  that  such  possessions 
v«e  the  cause  of  all  the  abuses  in  the  Church.    The  second  Council  of  Eat- 
ewn(1139)  imposed  silence  upon  this  most  dangerous  heretic,  and  by  papal 
"iflaence  he  was  driven  from  Italy,  France,  and  Zurich,  until  in  the  city  of 
Rome  itself  he  attained  supreme  power.    For,  falling  in  with  his  views,  the 
Romans  (after  1143)  confined  the  pope  to  the  exercise  of  ecclesiastical  gov- 
^rwnent,  and  to  the  possession  of  tithes  and  voluntary  offerings,  appointed  a 
Senate,  and  wrote  to  the  German  king  to  come  and  re-establish  the  capital 
of  his  dominions  according  to  ancient  imperial  laws,  within  the  walls  of  tho 


«')  I*erUTh.  IV.  p.  758.  Manst  Th.  XXI.  p.  2S78.  Acta  of  the  Latcran  Synod.  lb.  p.  28158.— 
''•  <?•  ffofmann,  Dn.  ad  Concordat,  Uenr.  et  CallxtL  ViL  1T39.  4 

«)  ManH  Th.  XXL  p.  892. 

*)  Olen%cM<tger^  Erleatr.  der  pQld.  Bulle.  Frkf.  1766.  4.  Cartularies,  p.  19.  Oeata  Archiep.  Trevlr 
b»  EctQrd  Th.  IL  p.  2197.    Radinici  de  gest  Frider.  1, 10.  ^ 

')  leo  In  his  treatises  aii  Italy,  samoaarily  in  the  Oescb.  d.  MA.  vol.  I.  p.  MSss.  JliiUmann,  das 
^*<^^eseo  des  MA.  Bonn.  1827.  2  vol&  Jager^  a.  d.  rel.  Bewegg.  in  d.  schwiib.  8tadten  y.  deren 
'""Buoc&h.  m.  d.  ideen  Arnolds.  {Klaiber'9  Btad.  d.  Qeisa  Wdrt  toL  IV.  H.  1.) 


202  MEDIAEVAL  CHURCH  HISTORY.    FEE.  IIL    A.  D.  80(^1810. 

eternal  city,  (d)  Lucius  II,  (1144)  led  an  army  against  the  people,  and  while 
his  troops  were  storming  the  capital,  he  was  killed  by  a  paving-stone  (1145). 
Bu genius  J II.  fled  to  the  quiet  convent  of  his  preceptor  St.  Bernard,  by 
whose  counsel  he  was  directed  in  the  government  of  the  Church,  (e)  Roger, 
King  of  the  Normans,  having  brought  him  back  to  Italy,  Bernard  wrote  for 
his  illustrious  pupil  the  "  Contemplations  on  the  Papacy."  (/)  In  this  work 
the  author  regards  the  papacy  in  its  ideal  glory,  as  an  office  appointed  by 
God  for  maintaining  justice  and  concord  among  the  people;  he  examines  the 
difficult  duties  which  such  an  office  involves  in  relation  to  human  infirmity, 
and  predicts  that  its  worldly  arrogance  will  bring  it  to  an  unhappy  end.  No 
efforts,  however,  could  give  peace  to  Rome,  where  struggles  for  ascendency 
continually  alternated  with  efforts  at  accommodation  with  the  popular  party. 
An  English  mendicant  boy  who  had  been  promoted  from  one  ecclesiastical 
station  to  another,  until  he  had  become  Bishop  of  Albano,  succeeded  Enge- 
nius  under  the  name  of  Hadrian  IV,  (1154).  {g)  He  prohibited  all  public  wor- 
ship in  Rome,  until  the  senate  from  jealousy  abandoned  Arnold  of  Brescia. 
The  latter  soon  after  fell  into  the  hands  of  the  emperor  Frederic,  who  sacri- 
ficed him  either  from  a  professed  regard  to  the  pope,  or  from  a  real  hatred 
to  republican  liberty.  He  was  finally  hung  at  Rome  (1155),  his  body  was 
burned,  and  his  ashes  were  thrown  into  the  Tiber,  {h) 

187.     The  Crusade  of  St,  Bernard, 

Palestine  had  now  become  a  European  colony,  receiving  continual  acces- 
sions of  people  from  the  migrations  of  discontented  persons  hoping  to  im- 
prove their  condition  by  the  change.  The  relations  and  parties  which  existed 
in  Europe  were  therefore  repeated  there  in  an  exaggerated  form.  Accord- 
ingly we  find  there  a  feudal  sovereignty,  in  which  the  king  was  the  chief  and 
simply  the  first  baron  of  the  realm.  He  was  also  in  perpetual  conflict  with 
the  hierarchy,  whose  chief  was  the  Patriarch  of  Jerusalem,  and  who  attempt- 
ed to  re-enact  the  part  of  the  pope,  so  far  as  his  relations  to  the  king  were 
concerned.  Between  these  two  personages  sprung  np  independent  municipal 
associations,  and  companies  of  spiritual  knights,  (a)  The  Greek  emperor  was 
always  suspected  and  secretly  hated,  and  the  native  Christians  were  regarded 
as  aliens  and  proper  objects  of  oppression.  The  Mohammedans  fought  under 
the  conviction  that  it  was  for  religion,  honor  and  dominion.  The  Norman 
kingdom  of  Edessa  had  been  overthrown  (1144),  and  it  was  evident  that 
deliverance  could  be  expected  only  by  new  levies  from  the  West.  Bernard^ 
the  great  saint  of  that  age,  assumed  the  direction  of  this  enterprise,  promis- 
ing, as  the  messenger  of  God,  a  certain  victory.    Eugenins  went  so  far  as  to 


d)  MarUite  ampl.  CoL  Th.  II.  p.  89Ss.    Otto  FHs.  de  reb.  gest  Frld.  I,  2a 

e)  Jitffi  p.  617a0. 

/)  De  Conahleratlone  I  V.  (Bernardi  0pp.  Ven.  Th.  IL)    (7.  F.  ScJifuider^  Bor.  1S51. 

g)  R.  Ruby,  Adrian  IV.  Lond  1849. 

h)  Geroh^  Provost  of  Keicbersperg,  de  investigatione  AntlcbristL  (jGrtUeri  Col.  Scrr.  adr.  "W«l- 
dens.  Proleejt.  c  4.) 

a)  The  laws  enacted  there  are  lost,  but  tbej  may  be  inferred  fW>m  the  code  which  Count  Jtan 
cTJMin  established  In  Cyprua:  Acaiflee  et  bona  uaagea  don  royaame  de  Jeroaalem,  etc  p.  IhaumoM 
ds  Thaumatire.  Par.  1690. 


CHAP.  L    PAPACY.    $  ISS.  FREDERIC  L    HADRIAN  IV.  203    * 

sacrifice  the  rights  of  creditors  and  feudal  lords,  that  he  might  promote  the 
interests  of  this  crusade,  (b)  Louis  VII.  of  France  took  up  the  cross,  that  he 
might  atone  for  his  crime  of  hnrning  a  church  filled  with  human  beings,  and 
Canrad  of  Germany  was  hurried  into  the  same  act  against  his  inclinations 
by  the  power  of  Bernard's  eloquence.  Each  of  these  princes  led  across  the 
Hellespont  an  army  of  70,000  men  (1147).  Most  of  these  perished  in  conse- 
quence of  the  deceitful  poUcy  of  the  Greeks,  and  the  opposition  of  the  ele- 
ments, so  that  the  princes  returned  with  only  the  fragments  of  their 
armies,  (c)  Bernard  defended  his  veracity  by  appealing  to  the  inscrutable 
nature  of  the  divine  counsels,  and  by  complaining  of  the  crusaders  them- 
selves, whose  crimes  had  rendered  thorn  unworthy  of  victory.  The  more 
pious  portion  of  his  contemporaries  were  consoled  with  the  reflection,  that  if 
the  undertaking  had  been  injurious  to  their  temporal  interest,  it  had  certainly 
promoted  the  welfare  of  their  souls,  (d) 

§  188.     Frederic  /.,  Barharossa^  1152-1190. 

L  Constltutiones  in  PerU  P.  IV.  p.  89-185u  0(to  FrUlng.  de  gestis  Frltlerlci  1.  II.  till  1158,  con 
tinned  by  liaderieus  tl!!  1160.  {3furatoH  Th.  VI.  p.  629.)  Godo/redi  YA^rhUnHiH  Pantheon  till 
lt8&  (Pittoriiu  Tb.  IL  p.  8.)  GnnVieri  Ligurinns  n<ar  the  end  of  the  12th  cent  ed.  Dumgf, 
Ileidelb.  1$12.  The  Italian  Chruntclera  hnd  others  in  Jfuratori  Th.  VI.  The  contemporary  poi>e9y 
ami  original  docnments  in  Manti  Tb.  XXIsi.  Jajfft^  p.  65S-S54.  Biographies  in  JJuratori  Tb. 
IIL  p.  Is.    Jttff,  p.  658-854. 

IL  Xortum^  Fr.  I.  Aar.  1818.  J.  VoipU  Oeecb.  d.  Lombarden-Bandes  n.  a.  Kampfes.  mit  Fr. 
Ki*nl}^b.  IS  IS.  F.  «.  liaumer,  Gesch.  d.  Ilohenst  Lpz.  (1828)  1841s.  vol  IL  liingy  Fr.  L  iou 
Kimpfe  g«'gen  Alex.  III.  Stuttg.  1835.  //.  lieuter,  Oesch.  Alex.  IIL  u.  d.  Kirche  seiner  Zeit  Berl. 
1S15.  ToL  1.  W.  Zimmerman^  die  Ilohenst  o.  Kampf.  d.  Monarchle  gegen  Papst  und  repabl.  Fieih. 
Stattg.  1S38.  S  vola. 

The  heroic  race  of  the  HoTienstavfens  almost  succeeded  in  realizing  the 
idea  of  the  empire.  Frederic  /.,  already  renowned  for  his  heroic  exploits  in 
the  East  and  in  the  West,  ascended  the  throne  with  a  determination  to  re- 
establish, in  spite  of  all  opposition,  the  ancient  power  of  the  emperor  Charles 
on  both  sides  of  the  Alps.  He  well  knew,  however,  that  the  pope  could  be 
of  immense  service  to  him  in  the  attainment  of  his  universal  dominion,  (a) 
He  therefore  gave  Uadrian  assurances  of  his  friendship  when  he  entered  upon 
his  Roman  expedition  (1155),  and  although  some  violations  of  good  faith 
then  took  place,  they  were  easily  overlooked  when  both  parties  were  inclined 
to  peace.  But  the  Roman  people  received  iron  instead  of  gold.  First,  Ila- 
drian's  one-sided  treaty  with  the  King  of  the  Two  Sicilies,  and  then  an  occa- 
sional hint  from  him  that  the  emperor  held  the  empire  as  a  feudal  tenure 
from  the  pope,  {I)  raised  the  indignation  of  the  German  nation.  Under  their 
powerful  leader  this  people  had  been  awakened  to  a  recollection  of  their 
Mcieut  independence.  The  emperor  indulged  the  hope  of  putting  an  end  to 
the  subjection  paid  to  a  foreign  bishop,  and  of  forming  a  great  national  Ger- 
°^  Church,  under  the  jurisdiction  of  the  Archbishop  of  Treves,  to  whom 

» 

*)  Bugen.  Epi  ad  Ludov.  (J/ti««i  Th.  XXL  p.  6268.) 

«)  Otto  FrU.  de  gest  Frid.  I,  SSsa.     Odo  de  Deogilo,  de  profectione  Lud,  in  Or.  (Chi/let,  Ber- 
Mrtl  lliusire  genus.  Divione.  1660.  4.)  WiL  Tyr.  XVI,  ISss. 
^  J^frn.  de  consider.  II,  1.    Otto  Frising.  1.  c.  L  60. 
")  Joan,  Saruber.  cpi  &9.      h)  ManH  Th.  XX  p.  790. 


204  MEDIAEVAL  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  III.    A.  D.  800-1216. 

it  was  not  altogether  without  significance  that  our  Lord  bequeathed  his  seam- 
less coat,  and  Peter  his  staff.  This  plan,  however,  failed  of  accomplishment 
on  account  of  the  jealousy  which  prevailed  among  the  German  princes,  and  the 
contest  with  Italy,  (c)  The  emperor  wenc  once  more  across  the  Alps  (1158) 
with  a  larger  army  than  before,  reduced  Milan  to  submission,  and  at  the  Diet 
of  the  Roncalian  plains  had  his  imperial  rights  explained  out  of  the  Roman 
Code  by  the  renowned  doctors  of  civil  law  in  Bologna.  According  to  these, 
his  authority  was  that  of  an  unlimited  monarchy,  such  as  was  utterly  for- 
eign to  the  usages  of  the  German  people.  But  the  power  of  science  of  which 
the  Italians  were  at  that  time  proud,  was  by  this  decision  added  to  that  of 
the  imperial  arms,  (d)  The  bishops  as  well  as  the  towns  were  referred  to 
long  forgotten  feudal  obligations,  and  when  the  hierarchy  beheld  its  rights 
violated,  it  began  to  grasp  after  its  spiritual  powers,  when  Hadrian  died 
(1159).  The  hierarchical  party  elected  in  his  stead  Alexander  III.^  while  a 
few  cardinals  in  the  imperial  interest  chose  Victor  III.  Alexander,  whose 
cause  was  triumphant  on  nccount  of  its  connection  with  that  of  popular  free- 
dom. A  few  cities  of  Upper  Italy  had  sworn  together  (1164)  that  they 
would  rather  suffer  destruction  than  any  longer  endure  the  oppressions 
which  the  imperial  deputies  had  arbitrarily  inflicted  upon  them.  This  League 
of  Verona  was  soon  after  gradually  extended  till  it  became  the  great  Lorn- 
bardie  League^  at  the  head  of  which  the  pope  appeared  as  the  supreme  dema- 
gogue. A  terrible  war  was  now  kindled,  in  which  one  party  contended  for 
freedom  and  the  other  against  rebels.  Abandoned  by  the  army  of  the 
Guelphs,  the  emperor  was  defeated  at  Lcgnano  (May  29,  11 70),  but  even 
when  defeated  and  excommunicated  he  was  still  an  object  of  terror.  He 
concluded  a  treaty  of  peace  and  friendship  with  Alexander  at  Venice  (Aug. 
1,  1177),  in  which  he  renounced  the  rival  pope,  and  entered  into  a  truce  of 
fifteen  years  with  the  King  of  the  Sicilies,  and  another  of  six  years  with  the 
Lombards.  This  last,  after  the  death  of  Alexander  (1181),  was  exchanged 
for  the  peace  of  Constance  (1183).  {e)  The  basis  of  the  treaty  of  peace  Avith 
the  hierarchy  was  the  Concordat  of  Wonns,  while  that  of  the  peace  with 
the  cities  was  the  condition  of  Itajy  before  the  second  Roman  expedition. 
The  cities  were,  as  republics,  to  be  equal  in  rank  Avith  the  great  vassals  of 
the  crown,  and  the  estates  of  the  Countess  Matilda  were  to  remain  in  the 
possession  of  the  emperor  for  fifteen  years,  when  they  were  to  be  disposed 
of  by  a  decision  of  arbitrators.  The  emperor  then  took  signal  vengeance 
upon  the  Guelphic  family,  and  thereby  established  his  supremacy  in  Germa- 
ny. By  the  marriage  of  his  son  Henry  with  Constantia,  the  heiress  of  the 
two  Sicilies  (1186),  he  also  acquired  for  his  house  a  prospect  of  possessing 
the  whole  of  Italy. 


c)  Comp.  J.  Ficlrer,  Reinald  v.  Dassel,  Reichskanzler  u.  Erzb.  v.  Koln.  KGln.  1S50. 

d)  S(if>iQ7iy,  Oescb.  des  rom.  Rechts  Im  Mlttelalter.  Heldelb.  18158a.  vol.  IV.  p.  151B8. 

e)  Convcntus  Vcnetus ;  Pertz  Th.  IV.  p.  151m.    Pax  Constantlae:  lb.  p.  I'Sss. 


CUAP.  L  TAPACY.    §  189.  BECKET.  205 

§  189.     Thomas  Bechet. 

I.  Thorn.  Bed'.  Epp.  1.  VI.  cd.  Ch.  Lupm,  Brux.  1682.  4.  S.  Thorn.  Cant  0pp.  (Patroa  Ecc- 
.\ngL  ed.  GUes^  Oxon.  lS45ss.  vols.  I.-YIII.  Biographies  by  fuur  of  his  followers:  Johannes  Saris- 
ber.  Wilh.  Stepbaiiidea,  Alanus  and  Herbert  dc  Boeham,  by  the  command  of  Greg.  IX.  collected 
in  the  QuadrilogQS  do  vita  ^.  Thomae,  froquenlly  published,  esiiecially  In  Lnpns' edition  of  the  Letters. 

IL  Hist  de  demel6  de  Henri  II.  avcc  Becket  Amst  1756.  BataiUe,  vie  poUtiqae  at  civile  de 
Til.  B«^k.  Par.  1842.  JlerheH  de  Botiehatn,  Vita  S.  Thom.  (Patres  Ecc  Angl.  vol.  VIII.)  BrUehar^ 
Th.  Beck.  (Tub.  Qnrt.  1852.  H.  \.)—Thierty,  Illst  de  la  conqnoto  de  I'Angl.  par  les  Normands.  Par. 
1S25.  vol.  II.  p.  876m.  [transl.  into  Engl,  by  Wm.  I/mlitt,  with  an  App.  Lond.  1847.  2  vol&  S.] 
lievUr^  Alexander  III.  vol.  I.  p.  2S$9s.  {J.  A.  GUea^  Life  and  Letters  of  Th.  i^  Becket,  by  contem- 
porary historians.  Lond.  1846.  2  vols.  S.  Eclectic  Mag.  Jane,  1846.] 

During  the  reigns  of  William  the  Conqueror  and  his  son,  the  English 
dergy  had  been  kept  in  the  most  rigorous  subjection.    But  in  the  midst  of 
the  party  struggles  which  took  place  under  the  feeble  government  of  Ste- 
phen (1135-54),  they  broke  loose  from  the  State  and  established  their  free- 
dom by  connecting  themselves  intimately  with  the  Roman  court,  as  the  only 
tribunal  of  ultiniate  appeal  in  all  legal  matters  in  which  they  were  concerned. 
Henry  II.  demanded  that  the  rights  of  the  crown  over  the  clergy  should  be 
restored,  and  caused  an  edict  to  be  passed  at  the  Diet  of  Clarendon  (1164), 
which  declared,  *'  The  election  of  prelates  shall  take  place  in  the  royal  chapel 
with  the  consent  of  the  king.     In  all  civil  matters,  and  in  cases  of  dispute 
with  laymen,  the  clergy  shall  be  amenable  to  the  royal  court.     Without  the 
consent  of  the  king,  no  cause  can  be  carried  to  any  foreign  jurisdiction,  no 
clergyman  shall  leave  the  kingdom,  and  no  person  belonging  to  the  royal 
council  shall  be  excommunicated."*    For  the  accomplishment  of  his  plan 
the  king  had  appointed  his  Chancellor,  Tliomaa  Becl-et,  Archbishop  of  Can- 
terbury (11 02).    But  Becket  was  no  sooner  made  the  head  of  the  Anglican 
Church,  than  he  became  possessed  of  the  spirit  of  his  station.    lie  laid  aside 
all  worldly  pomp,  and  put  on  the  simple  habit  of  a  monk.     He  publicly  per- 
formed penance  for  giving  his  assent  to  the  Constitutions  of  Clarendon,  and 
received  from  Alexander  III.  absolution  from  the  oath  he  had  taken  with 
respect  to  them,    lie  was  now  obliged  to  fly  before  the  king's  wrath,  which 
fell  upon  his  innocent  kindred,  and  spared  not  even  the  child  in  the  cradle. 
Sustained  by  the  power  of  the  pope,  ho  maintained  his  cause,  Avhile  in  France, 
V  spiritual  weapons,  until  he  compelled  his  king  to  enter  into  a  compromise 
^y  which  he  was  allowed  to  return  to  his  diocese.    He  had  no  sooner  done 
^is  than  he  issued  sentence  of  excommunication  against  all  who  adhered  to 
^e  Constitutions  of  Clarendon.    A  careless  expression  used  by  the  king  was 
seized  upon  by  his  knights,  and  unfortunately  carried  into  speedy  execution, 
JiDd  on  the  29 th  of  December,  1170,  the  archbishop  was  slain  at  the  very 
foot  of  the  altar.     Alexander  canonized  this  bold  martyr  for  his  ecclesiastical 
independence,  and  the  king  was  generally  looked  upon  by  the  people  as 
^ilty  of  the  murder.     As  the  opinions  of  the  people  were  of  great  impor- 
^ce  to  Henry  in  his  contests  with  his  rebellious  son,  he  purchased  absolution 
from  Rome  by  conceding  to  it  the  freedom  of  its  judicial  proceedings.    He 
^  became  reconciled  to  his  people  by  performing  an  humble  penance  at  the 

•  Mansl  Th.  XXI.  p.  1187.  1194m.    {LandorCn  Manual  of  Conncils,  p.  182^8.     ChurtoiC»  Early 
^L  Church,  chap.  18w     WUkiru^  Ck)nc.  vol  J.  pi  485.] 


206  MEDIAEVAL  CHURCH  HISTORT.  PER  IIL    A.  D.  800-1216. 

grave  of  his  deadly  enemy  (1174).    After  this  the  papal  legates  exercised 
complete  control  over  the  Church  and  the  revennes  of  England. 

§  190.     The  Crumde  against  Salaheddin. 

1)  Tageno^  Decanas  Ecc.  Patav.  Dcjscr.  cxpeditionis  AslaL  FridericL  {FreJier  Th.  I.  p.  40B.) 
Antberti,  Clerid  Austriaci,  Hist  de  exjied.  Fiid.  ed.  J.  Dobrotctky,  Prag.  1S27.  2)  Galfiidi  d4 
Vino  Salvo  Itinenuiain  Richardi.  {Bongar^  Th.  I.  p.  1150.  bat  better,  Gale^  Scrr.  Hist  AngL  voL 
II.  p.  247.)  Eigordi  Gothi  (royal  phyalclan)  Ann.  de  reb.  a  Phil.  Aug.  jrestK  {Du  Che»ne  Th.  V. 
p.  1.)  [G.  P.  R.  James,  Ili^t  of  Richard  Coeor  de  Lion.  Lond.  1S42.  and  Phtlad.  1645.  2  vols,  a  T. 
KeigMUy,  C.  Mills,  and  J.  Jfichaud,  as  referred  to  in  §  188.  Chronicles  of  the  Crusaders  (in  Bohnli 
Ant  Lib.)  Lond.  184S.] 

Salaheddin  united  under  his  sword  Anterior  Asia  and  Egypt.  Jerusalem 
submitted  to  him  after  a  sanguinary  battle  (Oct.  3,  1187).  Overwhelmed 
with  the  news,  Europe  heard  the  call  of  Gregory  VIII.  for  a  new  crusade, 
to  prepare  for  which  all  who  remained  at  home,  even  the  Church,  were 
required  to  contribute  Salaheddin's  Tithe.  Even  Frederic  I.  did  not  consider 
himself  too  old  to  resume  the  heroic  life  of  his  youth.  He  broke  his  way 
through  the  Grecian  empire  and  Asia  Minor,  and  was  finally  drowned  in  the 
Calycadnus,  near  Seleucia  (1190).  Hi«  son  and  the  strength  of  his  host  fell 
before  the  plague.  The  same  summer,  the  kings  of  France  and  England, 
through  the  mediation  of  the  Church,  came  to  an  ac^ustment  of  their  differ- 
ences, and  transported  their  armies  by  sea  to  Palestine.  Richard  the  Lion* 
hearted,  on  his  way  thither,  recovered  Cyprus  from  the  hands  of  a  Grecian 
rebel,  and  invested  his  knights  with  the  fiefs  of  nearly  half  the  island. 
Akron  also  soon  fell  before  them.  But  in  vain  were  prodigies  of  valor  per- 
formed, since  every  advantage  was  rendered  useless  by  the  mutual  jealousies 
of  the  ditforent  sovereigns  and  nations.  After  a  few  months  Philip  Augus- 
tm  was  taken  sick,  returned  to  France,  and  equipped  himself  against  the  pos- 
sessions of  the  English  king.  Richard,  forsaken  by  all,  and  threatened  at 
home,  concluded  with  his  noble  enemy  a  three  years'  truce,  which  secured 
the  coast  as  a  Christian  territory,  and  opened  Jerusalem  to  the  visits  of  the 
pilgrims.  On  his  return  home  the  Lion-heart  was  imprisoned  in  Austria, 
and  sold  to  the  emperor,  from  whom  he  was  purchased  by  his  own  people. 
The  pope  proved  at  least  his  good  will  by  asserting  the  Christian  law  of  nar 
tions  in  behalf  of  a  crusadeh."" 

§  191.    Emry  VI.     Celestine  IIL    (1191-1198.) 

Peru  Th.  IV.  p.  186s8.    Jaffi  p.  6S6s8.— i?auin«r,  Hohe&st  vol  XL  p.  62888.    O.  Abel,  K  Phil 
ipp  d.  Ilohenst  BrL  1SS2.  p.  188a. 

Henry  VL  was  on  an  expedition  through  Italy  to  take  possession  of  the 
Two  Sicilies,  which  had  fallen  to  him  by  inheritance  (1189),  when  he  received 
from  the  East  the  news  of  his  father's  death.  He  immediately  purchased  an 
imperial  coronation  from  the  Romans,  by  abandoning  the  faithful  city  of 
Tusculum.  The  Sicilians,  dreading  a  foreign  government,  had  elevated  to 
the  throne  Count  Tancred^  a  natural  son  of  their  extinct  royal  family,  whom 
the  pope  hastened  to  invest  as  his  vassal.    But  after  Tancred's  death  (1194), 

•  Baron,  ad  ann.  119a  Na  Saa.  MaUk.  ParU  ad  ann.  IIM. 


CHAP.  I.    PAPACY.    S  IW.  CELESTINE  IIL    $  IW-  INNOCENT  IIL  207 

the  Two  Sicilies  submitted  themselves  to  Henry.  This  prince  possessed  the 
powerful  talents  for  government,  but  not  the  chivalrous  spirit  of  his  father, 
and  utterly  regardless  of  the  means  which  he  used,  he  now  held  Italy  and 
the  pope  under  the  most  galling  slavery.  He  now  made  preparations  to  ren- 
der the  crown  of  the  German  empire  hereditary  in  his  family,  to  engage  in 
another  crusade,  and  to  conquer  the  Grecian  empire.  Pious  prophecies 
hailed  him  as  the  servant  of  the  Lord  to  chastise  the  Church  and  to  punish 
the  nations,  (a)  Celestine  IJLy  the  aged  pope  who  had  placed  the  crown 
upon  his  head,  without  venturing  upon  any  decisive  step,  merely  admonished 
him  that  it  would  profit  no  one  to  gain  the  whole  world  to  the  injury  of  his 
own  souL  (b)  The  youthful  emperor  beheld  a  vast  Grerman  empire  extended 
before  him,  when  a  superior  power  suddenly  interposed,  and  he  died  at  Mes- 
eina  (Sept.  28,  1197),  leaving  Frederic  11,^  a  child  of  but  three  years  of  age, 
in  the  midst  of  his  enemies. 

§  192.    Innocent  IIL    Jan.  8,  1198.-VwZy  16,  1216. 

L  EpUtoiar.  Innoc  1.  XIX.  (1.  2.  in  parts  5. 10-lS.  Yola.  in  Epp.  Inn.  ed.  BaluHuHy  V«c.  2  Th.  f. 
&  5-9tii  y<A.  in  Diplomata  etc  ad  res  Francicas  spectantia  edd.  Feudrix  da  Briquigny  et  la  Porte  du 
TkeiL  Par.  1791.  2  Th.)  Regittrum  Inn,  III.  sopv  nogotlo  Rom.  Imp.  {Baluz,  Tb.  I.  p.  687.)  J,  F. 
Boehmer,  Begesta  Imp.  now  ed.  Stnttg.  1849.  4  p.  289s9.— (7««to  Inn.  IIL  by  a  contemporary.  (Bri^ 
fvigny  Th.  L)  Richardi  de  &  Germano  Chronic  ad  a.  1189-1248.  (MuratoH  Th.  VII.  p.  963.)  The 
OBbTorable  side  in  MattAaeut  Paris,  Hist  rai^or.  [MaiL  Paris,  Chronicle,  Stc  transl.  by  Giles. 
Loud.  18ia  12.] 

IL  F.  Hurler,  Gesch.  Innoc  III.  n.  seiner  Zeitgenosscn.  H&mb.  1834-42.  4  vols.  (18456.  8  ed.) 
\AVb6  Jorry'9  Tlist  of  Innocent  IIL  (in  French)  is  announced  in  Paris.  1858.  Bohringer^  Church  of 
Ctolit  sod  its  witnesses,  in  a  new  rol.  publ.  in  Lpa.  1854.  is  a  life  of  Innoc  IIL] 

Cardinal  LotJiaire,  of  the  noble  Roman  house  of  Gonti  which  possessed 
landed  estates  in  Anagni  and  Segni,  educated  in  Rome,  Paris,  and  Bologna, 
and  eminent  not  only  as  a  theologian  but  as  a  jurist,  was  raised  to  the  papal 
chair  in  the  full  vigor  of  early  manhood  under  the  name  of  Innocent  III. 
The  grand  objects  to  which  this  richly  endowed  sacerdotal  prince  devoted  his 
thoughts  were  the  fortification  of  the  States  of  the  Church,  the  deliverance 
of  Italy  from  the  dominion  of  foreign  princes,  the  separation  of  the  Two 
Sicilies  from  all  connection  with  the  German  empire,  the  liberation  of  the 
Oriental  Church,  the  exercise  of  a  guardianship  over«  the  confederacy  of  the 
States,  the  extermination  of  heretics  from  the  Church,  and  the  promotion  of 
ecclesiastical  discipline.  Immediately  after  his  consecration  he  exacted  an 
oath  of  allegiance  from  the  imperial  prefect  of  the  city,  accustomed  the  no- 
bility and  people  of  Rome  to  obedience,  although  he  found  them  often 
deficient  in  this  respect,  took  the  Lombardic  League  under  his  protection,  and 
established  a  similar  confederacy  of  cities  in  Tuscany,  by  the  aid  of  which  he 
expelled  the  German  governor  whom  Henry  had  made  ruler  of  the  territories 
belonging  to  the  Church.  Even  before  his  baptism  Henry's  son  was  acknowl- 
edged as  his  father's  successor  in  the  empire.  But  Innocent  was  afraid  to 
aee  bo  many  crowns  united  upon  a  single  head,  and  the  princes  of  the  empy*e 
thought  the  crown  of  Charles  was  too  great  and  heavy  for  the  head  of  a 
child.    Having  renounced  all  the  prerogatives  of  the  Sicilian  monarchy, 

a)  InterpreUtio  praeclara  AbbaUs  Joachim  in  Hi^emiam.  Yen.  15S6.    Comp.  Abel,  Philippe 
^tll      b)Ja/i,p.WK 


208  MEDIAEVAL  CHUECH  UISTORY.    TER.  IIL    A.  D.  800-1216. 

Frederic  II.  was  invested  by  Innocent  with  the  feudal  sovereignty  of  the 
Sicilies.  So  highly  was  the  power  and  uprightness  of  the  pope  esteemed 
that  Constantia  on  bor  death-bed  intrusted  to  him  tlie  guardianship  of  her 
orphan  child  (Nov.  27,  1198).  lie  governed  the  Two  Sicilies  with  firmness 
and  energy,  so  far  at  least  as  was  possible  under  the  difficulties  of  his  situa- 
tion, and  in  face  of  the  opposition  of  the  German  and  Sicilian  nobles.  Italy 
was  distracted  by  various  factions,  all  of  which,  however,  attached  them- 
selves to  the  one  or  the  other  of  the  two  great  parties,  in  favor  of  the  CImrch 
or  of  the  empire,  afterwards  called  Guelphs  and  Ghihellities.  Innocent  pre- 
pared the  way  for  the  reconciliation  of  these  parties,  without  which  the 
freedom  of  Italy  could  never  bo  secured,  by  taking  Frederic  II.  the  natural 
head  of  the  Ghibellines  under  his  protection.  Under  his  guardianship  that 
prince  received  a  liberal  and  brilliant  education.  But  the  deliverance  of 
Italy  was  an  event  as  yet  far  distant  and  beyond  the  power  of  the  papacy. 
In  Germany,  when  Philip  of  Suabia  perceived  that  the  crown  could  not  be 
obtained  for  his  nephew  he  resolved  to  acquire  it  for  himself.  The  party  of 
the  Guelphs,  on  the  other  hand,  chose  Otho  IV.,  a  son  of  Henry  the  Lion. 
Both  rival  kings  appealed  to  Innocent,  who  declared  that  it  was  the  business 
of  the  pope  to  decide  in  all  cases  of  c(tnte>sted  elections.  With  every  appear- 
ance of  the  utmost  impartiality,  and  after  a  long  and  cautious  delay,  he  decided 
against  the  Ilohenstaufen  (1201),  but  when  victory  seemed  to  decide  in  favor  of 
that  prince  he  hesitated  not  to  negotiate  with  him.  {n)  Philip,  however,  was 
soon  after  assiissinated  (1208;  by  Otho  of  Wittelsbach,  one  of  his  offended  vassals. 
This  base  deed  was  detested  by  Innocent,  Otho,  and  all  Germany.  Otho  was 
then  crowned  at  Rome  (1209) ;  not,  however,  till  he  had  given  security  for 
the  freedom  of  ecclesiastical  elections,  the  toleration  of  appeals  to  Rome, 
and  the  legality  of  all  the  claims  which  the  Church  had  instituted  for  pro- 
perty against  the  empire,  (h)  But  when  he  afterwards  adhered  to  the  impe- 
rial oath,  in  which  he  had  sworn  that  he  would  demand  the  restoration  of  all 
fiefs  which  had  been  taken  from  the  empire,'  the  whole  political  scheme  of  the 
pope  was  endangered.  Greatly  dissatisfied.  Innocent  refused  to  acknowledge 
him  any  farther.  Still  resolved  in  some  way  to  accomplish  his  purposes  he 
made  Frederic  II.  swe(^r  that  when  he  shoiUd  attain  the  imperial  crown  he 
would  freely  confer  Sicily  upon  his  son.  This  oath  he  regarded  as  a  sufficient 
pretext  for  so  using  Frederic  as  to  allay  the  tlireatening  danger.  Armed  with 
the  pope's  gold  and  benediction,  the  Hohenstaufen  now  flew  across  tlie  Alps 
to  take  possession  of  his  father's  empire  (1212).  Even  with  the  blessing  of  the 
Church  Otho  seemed  forsaken  by  fortune,  and  every  one.  hastened  to  con- 
nect himself  with  the  party  of  the  youthful  conqueror.  In  the  very  first 
year  of  his  reign  Innocent  proclaimed  a  crusade.  Germany  was  prevented 
by  the  civil  war  from  enlisting  in  this  service,  and  the  kings  of  France  and 
England  had  fulfilled  their  vows  by  their  achievements  in  the  last  crusade. 
But  Fulco  of  Neuilly  who  went  forth  preaching  repentance,  so  stirred  the 
hearts  of  the  French  people  that  the  nobility  of  France  placed  themselves  at 

a)  WicJi^i.  de  Ottonis  IV.  et  TbiL  Saovj  ccrtanilnibus  atqae  Inn.  labore  in  sedandam  Begum  oozt- 
tcntionem.  Regiom.  1S35.    0.  Abel^  Philipp.    See  §  135. 
I)  negUtrum  Imp.  Ep.  TT.  186. 1S8. 1S9. 


CHAP.  I.    PAPACY,    i  192.  INNOCENT  III.    PHILIP  AUGUSTUS.  209 

the  head  of  the  nndertaking,  and  the  Venetians  were  hired  to  transport  and 
sost&in  the  army  by  a  naval  force.    The  dugo,  Dandolo^  took  advantage  of 
the  embarrassments  experienced  in  the  payment  of  the  price  agreed  upon, 
and  in  spite  of  the  remonstrances  and  anathemas  of  the  pope  he  employed 
the  army  of  the  crass  in  establishing  the  power  of  St.  Mark  in  Dalmatia. 
The  crusaders  were  then  involved  by  the  arts  of  a  fugitive  prince  in  the  wars 
of  the  Greek  imperial  palace.    In  the  course  of  these  contests  Constantinople 
was  token  (April  12,  1204),  a  Latin  empire  was  formed  there,  and  Baldwin, 
Count  of  Flanders,  was  proclaimed  its  first  but  powerless  emperor.     Innocent 
condemned  the  whole  transaction  and  the  horrors  connected  with  it,  but  did 
not  scruple  to  derive  advantage  from  it,  and  the  Patriarch  of  Constantinople 
was  appointed  by  him.  (<?)    But  the  strong  point  thus  gained,  by  which  a 
land  passage  was  opened  to  Palestine,  ingulfed  all  the  resources  of  men  and 
treasure  which  had  been  prepared  for  the  undertaking.    When  men  failed, 
however,  a  vast  host  of  children  took  the  field. — By  a  dexterous  use  of  the 
paasions,  the  devotion,  the  dissensions,  the  interest,  or  the  despotism  of  the 
kings  of  Europe,  Innocent  contrived  to  exercise  supreme  control  over  them. 
Fhilip  Augustus  had  repudiated  his  wife  Ingoburge,  the  sister  of  the  Danish 
king,  Canute,  and  the  French  bishops  had  given  their  consent  to  his  second 
marriage.    Innocent  therefore  deprived  the  whole  kingdom  of  Friiuce  of 
every  ecclesiastical  privilege,  with  the  exception  of  the  baptism  of  children 
lod  absolution  for  the  dying.    The  heart  of  the  king  was  deei)ly  wounded  by 
this  proceeding,  those  who  were  utterly  repugnant  to  each  other  were  required 
to  become  united,  and  those  who  truly  loved  were  to  be  torn  asunder.    But 
terrified  at  the  commotion  which  prevailed  among  his  people  he  was  com- 
pelled to  acknowledge  the  inviolability  of  his  former  marriage  (1201).  (d) 
Peter  IL  of  Aragon  regarded  a  coronation  by  the  pope. of  so  great  impor- 
tance that  he  came  to  receive  the  cro>vn  at  St.  Peter's  altar,  solemnly  prom- 
ising to  be  faithful,  and  to  pay  tribute  to  the  Roman  See  (1204).    Sancho  /.  of 
Portvgal,  after  a  stubborn  denial  of  it,  finally  acknowledged  the  validity  of 
tbe  document  in  which  his  father  had  made  his  kingdom  tributary  to  St. 
Peter.    By  the  pope's  mediation  in  Hungary  the  royal  brothers  were  recon- 
ciled, and  the  king's  son  was  crowned  by  the  states.    A  disputed  election  to 
the  archbishopric  of  Canterbury  was  submitted  to  his  decision  and  pro- 
wwnced  invalid.    This  afforded  him  an  opportunity  of  inducing  the  canons 
^hcwere  sent  to  him  to  choose  his  learned  friend.  Cardinal  Stephen  Lang- 
^whom  he  immediately  consecrated  to  that  office  (1207).    King  John, 
*  despot  without  power  or  judgment,  refused  to  acknowledge  I^angton, 
ud  seized  upon  the  revenues  of  the  clergy.    Innocent  then  laid  all  £ng- 
l«idnnder  an  interdict,  and  exconmiunicated  the  king  (1209).    John  sought 
^J  violence  to  compel  his  clergy  still  to  perform  the  services  of  religion, 


<)  Gtqfni  ds  VUU-Hardouin,  Hist  de  la  conqneete  de  ConsUnt  1193-1207.  [transl  into  Engl. 
^  tSiAiik.  Load.  1829.  8.]  (jC.  du  Freene^  Uist  de  Tempire  de  Const  sous  les  £mp.  fran^ola.  Yen* 
^t.)  HUt  of  tiie  empire  bj  Xioetat  Aoominatu*.  1118-120S.  ed.  Fabroti.  Par.  1647.  t 

^iBigordi  de  reb.  PhiL  Aug.  {Du  Chesne  Th.  V.  p.  86.)  Acta  Cona  DIvlon.  et  VIenn.  {J^ansi 
^  ^IL  PL  70a)  Soeasionens.  {lb.  p.  788.)— IL  J.  Schubt,  Phil  A.  a.  Ingeborg.  KioL  ISOl  Cap^- 
Mi^  Ujit  de  PhiL  A.  Briiz.  1880.  Tb.  IL  p.  141  19lMi 

14 


210  MEDIAEVAL  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  IIL    A.  D.  80O-1216L 

and  to  maintain  the  wavering  fidelity  of  his  vassals.    But  when  he  had 
become  utterly  ruined  in  his  own  country,  he  was  deposed  by  Innocent, 
and  his  kingdom  was  bestowed  upon  Philip  of  France.    Rejoiced  at  such  an 
opportunity  the  latter  prepared  an  army  and  a  fleet  for  taking  possession  of 
his  new  kingdom.    John  then  humbled  himself  before  the  pope  and  con- 
sented to  receive  England  as  a  fief  from  the  Holy  See  (1213).    But  the  bish- 
ops and  barons,  finding  themselves  subjected  to  a  king  whom  they  abhorred, 
and  a  pope  who  punished  a  whole  people  for  the  sins  of  their  ruler,  called  to 
mind  their  ancient  privileges,  and  extorted  from  John  the  celebrated  Magna 
Charta  (June  15,  1215),  which  has  ever  since  been  the  fundamental  law  for 
the  legislative  power  of  an  aristocracy  sustained  by  the  people.    When  John 
afterwards  violated  this  engagement  he  was  restrained  by  threats.    Innocent 
beheld  a  dependent  kingdom  wrested  from  his  grasp  by  a  people  who  were 
becoming  conscious  of  their  power.    In  vain  did  he  hurl  his  anathemas 
against  the  estates  and  their  charter ;  the  papal  power,  exalted  as  it  then 
was  in  its  authority,  had  now  found  an  antagonist  before  whom  it  was  des- 
tined to  fall,  (e)    Just  as  he  was  on  the  threshold  of  great  events  and  yet 
conscious  of  his  approaching  end,  (/)  Innocent  collected  around  him  the 
representatives  of  Christendom  at  the  Fourth  Synod  of  Lateran  (1215),  to 
take  measures  for  the  reconquest  of  the  Holy  Land,  the  extermination  of 
heretics,  and  the  reformation  of  the  Church.    A  general  Truce  of  God  was 
consecrated,  that  the  whole  power  of  the  European  nations  might  be  directed 
to  the  East.    The  most  terrible  measures  were  determined  upon  with  respect 
to  heretics.    Seventy  Canons  were  ratified  by  the  Council,  in  which  were 
specified  the  articles  of  the  Christian  faith,  and  the  most  important  rules  of 
law  and  discipline  in  a  modern  form,  but  in  their  ancient  severity.     The  pope 
is  represented  as  the  head  of  the  great  Christian  family  of  nations,  (gr)    With 
the  powers  thus  conferred  Innocent  was  right  in  likening  himself  to  the  son 
and  the  various  civil  governments  to  the  moon,  receiving  their  light  from  him 
as  from  a  feudal  lord,  (h)    He  who  had  often  described  in  the  darkest  colors 
the  miseries  of  the  human  race,  (i)  regarded  the  earth  as  worthy  of  his  care 
only  that  he  might  subject  it  to  the  law  of  God.    Feeling  that  he  had  be- 
come too  much  estranged  from  himself  by  the  press  of  public  duties,  and  the 
want  of  time  for  heavenly  contemplations,  he  longed  to  eiyoy  the  privileges 
of  the  pastoral  ofiice,  and  preached  as  often  as  possible.    His  discourses,  as 
well  as  his  judicial  decisions,  which  were  long  regarded  as  models  for' legal 
documents  of  that  kind,  were  highly  figurative  and  composed  in  the  style  of 
the  Old  Testament.    But  even  in  his  most  fanciftil  and  subtle  allegories  there 
is  always  apparent  a  profound  earnestness  of  spirit,  with  groat  gravity  of  ex- 
pression.   With  his  analytical  mind  he  doubtless  sometimes  perverted  the 
cause  of  justice,  according  to  circumstances,  from  its  strict  course  of  recti- 


e)  MaUh.  Par.  ad.  ann.  120tes.  Original  docaments  in :  Rymeri  Foedera  et  Acta  pobL  tntsr 
Reg.  Angliae  ot  al.  Prino.  aacta  ot  om.  a  Clarke  et  Holbrooke^  Lend.  181 6ss.  toL  L  P.  L 

/)  Uui-ter,  vol.  IL  p.  68&    g)  Acta  in  Mansi  Th.  XXII.  p.  953-10S4  [Landcn^  p.  2988a.] 

h)  Innoo.  1. 1.  Ep.  401.  Geeta.  e.  68. 

t)  De  mlseria  humanae  oonditionib  s.  de  oontemtn  mundl  0pp.  (Sermons  A  asoetle  wrltiogi|  in. 
oompleto  )  CoL  1675.  Yen.  1578. 4 


CHAP.  IL    ECCLES.  LAW.    §198.  CANON  LAW.  211 

tode,  and  jet  he  bad  a  right  to  boast  that  even  his  intercepted  letters  wonid 
be  only  an  additional  evidence  of  his  perfect  integrity,  (l-)  He  was  certainly 
covetous  of  wealth,  and  his  legates,  in  whom  he  confided  too  much,  (/)  were 
still  more  so ;  but  no  presents  ever  turned  him  from  his  course.  His  style 
of  living  was  as  simple  as  that  of  Cincinnatas,  and  his  wealth  was  always 
enbservient  to  his  purposes,  and  freely  used  in  behalf  of  the  crusades  and 
the  poor.  He  was  inflexible  in  his  friendsliips,  a  father  to  widows  and 
orphansi,  and  when  acting  as  the  Vicar  of  the  Supreme  Prince  of  Peace,  he 
was  frequently  a  peacemaker  between  princes  and  their  subjects.  Misfor- 
tune never  subjected  him  to  those  severe  trials  in  which  great  characters 
are  proved,  but  he  availed  himself  of  fortunate  circumstances  with  all  the  skill 
of  an  ancient  Roman.  By  his  exertions  Rome  became  once  more  the  head  of 
the  civilized  world ;  although  his  greatest  plans  were  unsuccessful,  or  contained 
the  germs  of  future  failure.  The  legend,  according  to  which  the  soul  of  this 
great  vicar  of  God  was  delivered  with  extreme  difSculty  from  the  claims  of 
hell,  (m)  merely  shows  that  no  mortal  can  possess  unlimited  power  without 
injory,  or  that  even  the  highest  are  amenable  to  a  master  in  heaven,  and  to 
public  opinion  upon  earth. 


CHAP.  II.-^OOIAL  CONSTITUTION  OF  THE  CHURCH. 

§  198.     Gratian  and  his  Predecessors, 

BaUtrini  do  antlq.  canonnm  Coll.  (Leon.  0pp.  Tb.  IIL  p.  28988.)  Savigny^  Oesch.  d.  RSm. 
Seehte  tm  MA.  toL  IL  p.  VZia.— Anton,  Jugtutini  de  emendatione  Oral  L  IL  Tarmcon.  1S87. 
tad  often.  J".  £^  J3^Am«r,  de  varla  Deer.  Grat  fortana.  (At  the  oommencementof  his  edit,  of  the 
C  J.  Can.)  SarU^  de  Claris  arcbigymnasil  Bononiena.  Professoril).  Bon.  1769.  t  Th.  L  P.  I.  p.  24788b 
RUggtr^  de  Gimt  (0pp.  Frib.  1778.)  and  de  Qrat  Col.,  motliodo  et  mendis.  (Oblect  hist  et  jar.  Ulm. 
177&)  SaTigoj  ToL  IIL  p.  47588. 

The  Capitularies  of  Charles  and  Louis  were  collected  in  summaries  and 
separate  pieces,  and  published  by  Ansegisus  (827)  in  four  books.  The  two 
first  relate  to  the  affairs  of  the  Church.  To  these  wore  added  the  collection 
of  Jknedietus  Levita  (845),  in  which  were  embraced  not  only  the  Capitola- 
ries,  bot  the  statutes  derived  from  all  the  judicial  authorities  of  the  time,  (a) 
The  traditions  of  the  ancient  ecclesiastical  laws  and  the  work  of  Isidore 
formed  a  basis  from  that  time  forward,  to  which  the  compilers  only  added 
the  more  recent  laws  which  had  been  generally  received.  The  chronological 
order  was  not  required  in  a  systematic  arrangement,  and  was  also  abandoned 
for  want  of  a  knowledge  of  the  original  authorities.  Begino,  the  abbot  of 
Pruem  (d.  915),  gave  directions  from  older  authorities  respecting  the  visita- 
tion of  a  diocese,  and  quoted  the  legal  passages  on  that  sulject.  (h)    Burchard^ 


k)  Botkmtr^  Begesta,  p.  290. 

/)  HurUr^  yoL  IL  p.  W^,  perfectly  trostwortby  in  all  which  is  hostile  to  Innocent 

m)  Tkamas  CaniimprtUens.  Vita  Latgardts  II,  7.  {Raynald  ad  ann.  121d.  No.  11.)  differently 
embellisbed  near  the  elose  of  the  15th  cent  in  the  CompiL  chronologica.  (Pistor.  Tb.  L  p.  109a) 

a)  Anteg.  in  Perta  Tb.  IIL  p.  256.    Bened,  L&v.  lb.  Th.  IV,  2.  p.  17. 

&)  L.  IL  de  ajaodaL  caoais  et  disclplinis  eeoL  ed.  {BaluM.  Par.  1671.)  WasaertcMeben^  Lpa.  1340L 
Aadqoa  etaa.  CoL  qua  ami  «t  Begino  Pramiana.  e  ood.  Vat  td.A,L,  Biohtart  Ber.  1S44. 


212  MEDIAEVAL  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  IIL    A.  D.  800-1216. 

Bishop  of  Worms  (d.  1025),  and  7ro,  Bishop  of  Chartres  (d.  1115),  have  col- 
lected together  the  whole  stock  of  genuine  and  spurious  laws,  though  they 
have  arranged  them  in  a  very  arbitrary  manner,  (r)  But  when  the  Roman 
law  began  to  receive  much  academical  study,  Gratian^  of  the  convent  of  St. 
,  Felix  at  Bologna,  became  desirous  of  enlisting  a  similar  interest  in  behalf  of 
the  canon  law,  and  (about  1143)  {d)  wrote  his  Text  Book  and  Manual,  contain- 
ing a  system  of  ecclesiastical  law  on  an  historical  basis.  In  this  he  incorpo- 
rated all  the  laws  then  regarded  as  in  force,  deriving  his  materials  principally 
from  the  previous  collections,  which  he  sometimes  compared  with  tlie  origi- 
nal autliorities,  and  even  condescended  to  borrow  some  of  the  most  liberal 
statutes  from  the  decrees  of  the  Greek  synods.  The  arrangement  of  the 
work  was  logical,  but  to  some  extent  dependent  upon  the  historical  matter, 
and  each  division  was  prefaced  by  legal  principles  generally  derived  from 
history,  and  connected  by  intermediate  clauses  composed  by  Gratian  himself. 
It  consisted  principally  of  historical  documents,  especially  laws  and  legal 
opinions  of  all  kinds  taken  from  ecclesiastical  and  secular  authorities,  and 
grouped  together  in  a  fragmentary  manner,  but  copied  with  verbal  correct- 
ness. Gratian  generally  adopted  the  historical  errors  of  his  predecessors,  and 
seldom  reconciles  the  older  with  the  more  recent  enactments.  Although 
this  work  never  received  the  papal  sanction,  it  possessed  so  high  a  character 
for  science  and  academic  convenience,  that  ever  since,  so  far  as  its  historical 
elements  are  concerned,  it  has  been  received  as  a  manual  of  canonical  law 
for  the  whole  Western  Church.  It  has  also  served  as  the  basis  on  which, 
with  the  exception  of  some  errors  whicli  historical  criticism  has  discovered, 
eocletjiastical  jurisprudence  has  been  principally  developed,  (e) 

§  194.     The  Church  and  the  State, 

Mondtag^  Qesch.  d.  deutschcn  staat»b.  Frcih.  o.  d.  Recbte  d.  gemelncu  Frelen,  d.  Adels  n.  d. 
Etrcben.  Bamb.  u.  Wurtzb.  1812.  JluUmann^  Qescb.  (L  Urspr.  d.  Stuode  in  DeutBcbL  2  od.  BerL 
ISdO.  vol  L    Suffenheim,  StaaUlebcn  d.  Clerus  im  Mittelalt  BerL  1589.  toI.  L 

The  process  commenced  during  the  migration  of  the  northern  nations 
was  completed  during  the  stormy  period  of  the  ninth  and  tenth  centuries. 
This  was  the  process  by  which  the  German  republics  of  free  warriors  and 
landed  proprietors  became  merged  into  a  feudal  system  of  complicated  sov- 
ereignty and  dependence.  The  silent  power  of  the  Church  also  gave  its 
sanction  to  the  rights  of  man  while  claiming  those  of  the  Christian.  When 
the  Homan  empire  had  been  revived  in  the  German  nation  by  the  Othoti,  the 
emperor  was  regarded  as  the  political  head  of  Christendom  in  the  West,  and 
the  holy  Homan  empire  as  a  divine  institution.  The  emperor  waa  elected  by 
the  German  princes  and  bishops,  but  he  was  required  to  strengthen  the 


c)  Burchardi  Decretor.  1.  XX  Par.  1549.  and  often,— /po,  Pannonnia,  L  VIIL  ed.  MeUih,  d4 
Votmediano^  Lor.  1567.  Greater  revisions  by  another  band,  in  17  vols. :  Decretum  in  0pp.  ed. 
FrontOy  Par.  1W7.  2  Th.  t—Avg.  Theiner,  tu  Ivo's  venneintl.  Decret  Mentz.  1S82.  The  opposite 
view  In  F.  Q.  II.  Wa^sfrschUben^  Beltr.  z.  Gesch.  d.  vorgratian.  KKechtsqnellen.  Lp*.  1889. 

<f)  Concordia  discordantium  canonnm,  1.  III.  '  Even  in  1  ISO  it  is  cited  as:  ^*in  DecroUs,*"  and 
later  generally  as  the  "  Decretum.''    Printed  as  the  First  Part  of  the  Corpus  J.  canonicL 

«)  Guido  Pancirdut^  de  clavis  leg.  Interpretib.  HI,  &  Lp&  1721. 4.    Savigny,  toL  IIL  p^  619hi 


CHAP.  IL    KCCLES.  LAW.    §194  STATE  A  CHURCH.  -  213 

power  of  the  empire  in  Italy,  and  to  obtain  possession  of  the  imperial  crown 
which  the  popes  seldom  conferred  without  requiring  entangling  oaths  and  a 
subtle  confession  of  faith,  (a)  But  while  the  imperial  power  was  destroyed 
in  Italy,  and  every  effort  to  secure  it  as  an  hereditary  possession  was  frus- 
trated, the  great  vassals  became  firmly  established  as  princes  of  the  empire^ 
and  their  fiefs  became  hereditary.  As  long  as  the  election,  or  at  least 
the  investiture  of  the  bishops  depended  upon  the  emperor,  they  were 
bis  natural  allies  in  opposition  to  the  secular  princes.  The  result  was, 
that  in  all  those  towns  in  which  episcopal  sees  existed,  the  imperial  favor 
to  them  was  so  great  that  the  jurisdiction  of  the  courts  was  superseded 
by  them,  and  episcopal  immunities  (corpora  sancta)  sprung  up.  Some  of 
the  bishops  were  even  invested  with  dukedoms.  In  other  parts  of  Germany 
the  bishops  were  gradually  deprived  of  their  political  influence,  and  some 
even  became  dependent  upon  the  higher  crown  vassals.  Right  struggled 
every  where  with  might,  and  the  royal  power  with  the  great  vassals. 
The  Church  often  found  opportunity  to  mingle  in  these  struggles,  and  some- 
times it  was  compelled  to  do  so,  but  not  unfrequcntly  the  confusion  was  in 
this  way  only  increased.  In  particular  instances  it  was  repeatedly  overpow- 
ered, or  compelled  to  resort  to  begging,  in  which  it  sometimes  persevered 
with  an  Indian's  obstinacy,  (h)  Finally,  by  collecting  together  all  its  strength 
io  the  single  phalanx  of  the  papacy,  it  became  sp  completely  victorious  that 
it  threatened  to  absorb  all  the  prerogatives  of  the  state.  And  yet  the  old 
legal  principle  (§  122),  that  God  has  divided  all  power  on  earth  between  the 
fmperor  and  the  pf^pe^  was  received  according  to  its  German  construction, 
consistently  with  the  later  doctrine,  that  the  emperor  carried  the  secular 
sword  as  a  feudal  Investiture  from  the  pope.  It  was  even  conceded  that 
the  civil  power  might  be  peculiar  in  its  nature,  and  the  world  might  be  com- 
mitted to  the  government  of  princes,  (c)  and  that  the  pope,  by  virtue  of  the 
sacerdotal  and  royal  prerogatives  which  he  had  received  from  Christ,  should 
only  interfere  Avhen  they  exceeded  their  just  powera.  Against  the  scandals 
of  which  the  princes  in  those  rude,  times  were  not  unfrequcntly  guilty,  the 
provincial  bishops  were  generally  unable  to  oppose  any  effectual  resistance. 
Those,  therefore,  who  acknowledged  no  law  superior  to  themselves,  the  pope 
gammoned  in  the  name  of  God  to  answer  at  his  bar.  The  temporal  inherit- 
ance of  St.  Peter  was  regarded  as  indispensable  to  the  personal  independence 
of  the  pope,  but  it  involved  him  in  all  the  Italian  convulsions,  and  was  only 
a  precarious  possession  in  opposition  to  the  claims  of  the  emperor,  the  great 
lords,  and  the  municipalities.  The  Romans,  themselves  straitened  between 
the  pope  and  the  emperor,  never  possessed  any  thing  but  a  mere  caricature 
of  freedom. 

a)  E.  O.  Perta  Th.  IV.  p.  188. 

b)  Camp.  Raumery  HobeMtanf.  vol  VI.  p.  167.  with  BohJen  Indlon.  vol.  I.  p.  285. 

c)Tb«  oldrlew:  Sach»en*pifgely  \o\.  I,  art  I.  The  new:  SchirnhenttfiifgH,  Elnlelt  (Frkt 
154&  rO  P.  II.  oomp.  Honor,  HI,  in  Raumer^  toI  VI.  p.  6a  Grimm,  Bridiuites  Bescheidenh.  Oott 
l^AL  p.  LYIL 


214  MEDIAEVAL  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  IIL    A.  D.  800^1216. 

§  195.    Eeclesiasticnl  Power  of  th^  Papacy, 

The  general  belief  that  the  bishopric  of  the  pope  was  nniversal,  fre- 
quently gave  a  show  of  justice  to  the  efforts  that  on  every  opportunity  were 
made  to  extend  his  power.  Since  the  time  of  Gregory,  the  episcopal  power 
was  also  regarded  as  springing  wholly  from  the  papal.  It  was,  however, 
thonght  that,  like  the  emperor  in  the  civil  department,  the  pope  should  not 
suspend  the  exercise  of  the  subordinate  ecclesiastical  powers,  but  rather  pro- 
tect each  of  them  in  their  peculiar  duties,  and  the  pope  was  reminded  by  St. 
Bernard  that  the  papal  was  not  the  only  power  which  had  been  instituted 
by  the  apostles.  The  bishops  especially  looked  upon  their  pastoral  office  in 
their  own  dioceses  as  absolutely  inviolable,  and  they  simply  regarded  ab£0- 
lution  as  especially  efficacious  when  obtained  from  Rome,  (a)  In  important, 
cases  dispensations  were  with  increasing  eagerness  sought  for  from  Rome, 
and  in  all  judicial  causes  in  the  Church  the  Roman  Curia  was  looked  upon  as 
the  court  of  ultimate  appeal.  The  office  of  supreme  judge,  in  which  he  was 
responsible  only  to  God,  and  the  general  reputation  which  he  had  obtained 
of  being  the  most  perfect  depositary  of  the  pure  faith,  produced  in  some 
instances  a  belief  that  the  pope  was  infallible,  (Luke  22,  32  was  appealed 
to.)  Tliis  view,  however,  was  never  entertained  without  limitations,  or  ad- 
vanced without  opposition.  The  popes  always  acknowledged  the  articles  of 
faith  and  the  established  laws  of  the  Church  as  the  guide  and  limit  of  their 
powers.  They  were  far  from  appealing  to  their  own  arbitrary  authority,  but 
they  looked  to  the  law  of  God,  or  what  was  generally  regarded  as  such,  for 
the  sole  rule  of  their  conduct,  (h)  Tlie  Pallium  was  considered  indispensa- 
ble to  the  performance  of  the  archiepiscopal  functions,  and  Gregory  based 
upon  this  a  demand  that  all  the  archbishops  should  swear  allegiance  to  him 
from  whom  it  was  received.  The  same  demand  was  gradually  made  of  all 
bishops  whenever  their  elections  were  confirmed  by  the  popes.  At  first  this 
confirmation  was  sought  only  when  an  election  was  disputed,  but  soon  after 
the  time  of  Gregory  it  was  considered  essential  to  all  elections,  and  supplied 
occasions  for  innumerable  interferences  in  the  business  of  the  dioceses.  Gre- 
gory himself  still  adhered  to  the  freedom  of  the  canonical  choice,  (p)  New 
dioceses  were  erected,  and  changes  in  the  relations  of  the  old  Avere  to  be 
made  only  with  the  consent  of  the  pope.  When  appointments  were  made 
to  other  benefices,  the  pope  interfered  only  in  particular  instances,  and  by 
way  of  recommendation,  although  such  recommendations  were  nearly  equiva- 
lent to  commands.  The  bishops  were  generally,  by  their  political  position, 
beyond  all  danger  from  the  violence  of  the  popes,  who  had  a  right  to  exer- 
cise jurisdiction  over  them  only  in  cases  of  manifest  crime,  and  with  the  co- 
operation of  the  Synods.  But  as  a  membership  in  the  principal  councils 
depended  frequently  upon  the  papal  will,  very  few  of  them  ever  opposed  or 
thwarted  what  was  known  to  be  the  desire  of  the  pope,  and  most  of  them 

a)  Cona  Salegnnsted.  a.  1022.  c  la  {Mansi  Th.  XIX-  p.  898.)    Greg.  VII.  L  YL  Epu  4.  (7».  Tb. 
XX.  p.  260.)    Coinp.  D«  Marco,  de  Sacerd.  et  Imp.  IV,  8,  2. 

b)  Gratlan :  P.  I.  DL«t  XL.  c  6.  and  P.  I L  Cans.  XXXII.  Quest  T.  c.  18.  /nnoc  ///.  d* 
Pont  Serm.  8.    Comp.  Ilase,  StreiUcbr.  II.  2.  p.  QOsa. 

c)  Greg.  VIL 1.  V.  Ep.  11.  L  VL  Ep.  14. 


CHAP.  IL    ECCLEa  LAW.    8195.  PRIMACY.    8190.  CABDINALS.  215 

were  assembled  only  to  receive  and  perform  it.  The  ascendency  of  the  pope 
above  coimcils  was  claimed  with  great  caution,  and  only  in  some  occasional 
instances.  Ilis  authority  was  much  increased  by  the  pilgrimages  to  the  eter- 
nal city,  for  even  in  the  midst  of  her  ruins,  the  glory  of  the  ancient  and  the 
SQorednesB  of  the  modern  world  combined  with  her  wonderful  attractions  to 
render  it  a  place  of  concourse  for  the  people  and  princes  of  the  West.  The 
first  instance  of  the  canonization  of  a  person  at  a  distance  was  that  of 
mricb,  the  holy  Bishop  of  Augsburg  (993),  and  was  occasioned  by  peculiar 
external  circumstances.  In  the  twelfth  century,  this  privilege,  which  in 
itself  may  be  regarded  as  trifling,  but  became  important  on  account  of  the 
idea  from  which  it  sprung,  and  to  whose  realization  it  contributed,  (</)  was 
claimed  as  exclusively  belonging  to  the  pope.  A  papal  Coronation  is  no- 
where met  with  until  after  the  time  of  Nicolas  I.,  and  on  the  firpt  occasion 
of  the  kind  on  which  they  were  both  present,  the  emperor  led  the  animal  on 
which  the  pope  was  carried.  The  kissing  of  the  pope's  foot  sprung  from  an 
Italian  custom.  In  the  estimation  of  the  people  it  was  not  an  idle  display, 
but  very  significant  as  the  offering  of  pious  humility  to  Him  whom  the  pope 
represented.  By  means  of  Legates^  the  papal  power  became  almost  omni- 
present. The  rapacity  of  these  legates,  the  venality  of  the  ecclesiastical 
oourts,  and  the  illiberal  Italian  spirit  of  some  of  the  popes,  began  to  be  mat- 
ters of  pnblic  complaint  and  derision.  But  as  a  general  thing,  the  affections 
of  the  people  were  still  firmly  attached  to  the  papacy,  and  the  blessings 
which  it  procured  in  the  unity,  freedom,  and  reformation  of  the  Church 
were  generally  acknowledged. 

§  196.     The  Cardinals, 

TkomataifU  ret  et  nov.  Ecc  disc  P.  I.  1.  II.  c  IISas.     Brtddeus  ^t  or\^.  cnrdinalitiae  dlga. 
l»a.  12.    Muratori,  de  Cardin.  insUtuUone.  (Antiqq.  Ital.  med.  acvi.  vol.  IV.  p.  15-2.) 


In  the  primitive  Church  the  cardinals  were  the  ordinary  spiritual  officers 
of  the  Church  (incardinati).  Even  after  the  tenth  century  they  were  the 
canons  of  a  cathedral.  But  in  the  Komish  sense  of  the  term  during  the 
eleventh  century,  the  cardinals  were  the  highest  spiritual  officers  (i.  e.,  the 
deacons  and  presbyters)  of  the  Church  in  Rome,  and  seven  suburbican  bishops 
whose  sees  were  then  for  the  most  part  much  reduced  in  size,  (a)  These  car- 
dinals, in  opposition  not  only  to  the  Roman  people  and  the  emperor,  but  gradu- 
aUy  even  to  the  other  clergy,  maintained  that  it  was  their  sole  prerogative  to  elect 
the  pope  (§  180).  Alexander  III.  ordained  (1 179)  that  no  one  could  be  a  legally 
elected  pope  who  had  not  received  the  votes  of  two  thirds  of  the  legally 
assembled  cardinals,  (b)  The  cardinals  were  generally  selected  by  the  pope 
from  among  the  Italians,  and  constituted  his  ecclesiastical  and  civil  council. 
Thoogh  they  possessed  no  power  to  control  any  person  of  eminent  talents  in 

d)  Manti  toL  XIX.  p.  1698a.  Mabillan,  AcU  8S.  Ord.  Ben.  Sacc.  V.  Praef.  N.  99.— Deer.  Greg: 
L  IIL  tit  45k  c.  l.—Lambertini^  de  scrror.  Dei  canonizattone  L  IV.  {Benedicti  A'lV.  0pp.  Rom. 
1747.  ToL  L-IV.    4.)     Heilmann^  Consecratio  Sanctunim  ad  iivobiiaaus  veterum  Rom.  efflcU. 

HaL1754.4 

a)  Bunaen^  UlppoL  {>.  152a. 

h)  Cone.  Later.  UL  c.  1.  {Manti  toL  XXIL  p.  217.)    lLand<m,  p.  292.] 


216  MEDIAEVAL  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  UL    A.  D.  800-1211 

the  papal  chair,  their  influence  was  generally  sufficient  to  insure  a  certain 
uniformity  of  action  in  opposition  to  those  sudden  changes  which  individuals 
would  have  introduced.  In  consequence  of  their  rank  above  the  archbishops, 
the  pope  was  surrounded  with  a  courtly  splendor,  and  an  opportunity  waa 
afforded  by  which  he  could  reward  great  services,  and  place  men  of  eminent 
talents  under  obligations  to  himself. 

§  197.     The  Bishops^  and  the  Bishops'  Chapters, 

So  high  did  the  pope  stand  in  the  estimation  of  the  people,  that  the 
bishops  lost  nothing  in  dignity  by  their  subordination  to  him.  On  the  other 
hand,  it  was  by  his  assistance  that  they  were  generally  able  to  preserve  their 
independence  in  opposition  to  the  princes  of  the  various  countries  in  which 
they  lived.  There  were  a  few  great  bishoprics  whose  Chorbishops  had  from 
the  most  ancient  times  acted  as  the  bishops'  vicars  in  all  spiritual  affairs 
with  an  authority  which  was  uncertain  and  often  usurped  by  the  princes, 
but  never  dangerous  to  the  bishopric,  (a)  The  right  of  the  bishop  to  ap- 
point all  ecclesiastical  officers  in  his  diocese,  was  limited  by  the  right  of 
patronage^  which  even  a  layman  could  lawfully  acquire  by  founding  a 
church  or  a  prebend,  (ft)  The  archhishojis^  besides  the  power  of  presiding 
in  the  synods  of  their  own  dioceses,  merely  possessed  that  of  confirm- 
ing and  ordaining  the  bishops,  in  which,  however,  they  were  obliged  to  have 
the  concurrence  of  the  popes  or  their  legates.  They  generally  possessed 
very  extensive  dioiceses,  and  on  account  of  their  rank  they  acquired  special 
political  privileges.  At  the  coronation  of  Otho  I.  the  three  Rhenish  arch- 
bishops for  the  first  time  took  precedence  of  all  the  officers  of  the  empire. 
Some  of  the  other  archbishops  acquired  a  kind  of  primacy  over  a  whole 
kingdom,  as  Adalbert  of  Bremen  (d.  1072),  a  man  of  a  brilliant  mind,  but 
consistent  only  in  his  vanity,  and  ready  to  sacrifice  the  whole  Church  to  the 
promotion  ot'  the  interests  of  his  see,  in  which  he  hoped  to  become  a  patriarch 
of  the  North,  (c)  In  such  instances,  however,  the  popes  always  hastened  to 
form  another  archbishopric  in  the  same  country  to  guard  against  the 
establishment  of  a  national  ^patriarchate.  In  many  dioceses,  when  their 
bishops  were  to  be  appointed,  the  nobility  and  people  of  the  archbishopric  con- 
tended with  the  king  and  neighboring  bishops  for  the  right  of  choice,  and  not 
unfreqiiently  those  who  were  appointed  by  the  latter  were  most  terribly  re- 
pulsed. (^7)  After  a  gradual  attainment  of  their  exclusive  rights  in  this  matter, 
the  canons  obtained  by  their  prerogative  and  their  prospect  of  the  election,  a 
position  more  and  more  independent  of  the  bishop,  and  secured  to  them  by 
treaties.  The  canonical  life  was  generally  abandoned  during  the  tenth  century, 
but  some  zealous  popes  and  bishops  insisted  upon  its  re-establishment.  In  the 
midst  of  much  contention  two  classes  of  canons  were  then  formed  (canonioi 
saeculares  and  regulares),  and  even  monks  became  possessors  of  some  chap- 
ters.   The  canons  were  not  all  clergymen,  but  they  were  required  by  the 

T  -  ■  _      -  ■—  I  I.  ■  ■  -^^■— ^ 

a)  BahtM.  CapituL  vol.  L  p.  827&  8S<K  Against  QRrfirer:  W.  B.  Wenot,  d.  ftmnk.  Reich,  nach  dem 
Vertr.  v.  Venlun.  Lpz.  1851.  Append.  8. 

h)  n.  L,  Lippert,  L.  v.  Patronat  Glees.  1S29.    J.  Kaim,  KPatronat  Lps.  1845.  vol.  L 
c)  Adam.  Brenu  1.  III.  comp.  JaJJ^i  p.  571.       d)E.g.  Lambert,  iSehq/h.  ad.  ann.  1066^   . 


chap.il  kcclks.  law.  §  197.  chapters.  J 198.  jurisdiction.        217 

synodal  regulations  to  have  at  least  a  subdeacon^s  charge.  Any  vacancies 
which  occurred  in  the  Chapter  were  supplied  generally  by  a  vote  of  its  own 
members,  from  whose  number  its  various  officers  were  chosen.  A  dean  or 
prior,  sometimes  both,  presided  over  the  whole.  After  tlio  close  of  the 
eighth  century,  it  gradually  became  common  to  divide  the  largo  dioceses  into 
archdeaconries,  and  these  again  into  rural  chapters.  The  archdeacons  were  the 
regular  and  sometimes  even  then  the  troublesome  deputies  of  the  bishops,  but 
they  were  not  regarded  as  indispensable  to  a  complete  chapter.  When  the  ca- 
nons were  absent  for  a  long  period,  they  now  began  to  hire  vicars  to  officiate  in 
their  places,  and  to  mark  the  hours  by  singing.  The  livings  connected  with 
the  cathedrals  were  then  sufficient  to  become  objects  of  cupidity  to  the  no- 
bility, whose  still  increasing  importance  enabled  them  to  take  possession  of 
most  of  the  benefices.  Against  the  coteries  foimed  by  a  petty  aristocracy, 
wealthy  proprietors,  patronizing  relatives,  and  provincial  prejudices,  the 
popes  endeavored  to  maintain  the  liberal  principles  of  Christianity,  which 
asserted  the  derivation  of  all  men  from  the  same  original  ancestry,  pro- 
nounced the  poor  blessed,  acknowledged  no  kindred  but  the  children  of  God, 
and  recognized  no  birthright  in  the  kingdom  of  God  but  that  which  is  ac- 
qnired  in  regeneration,  {e)  The  domestic  chaplains  employed  by  the  nobility 
eibily  made  themselves  independent  of  the  bishops  by  a  servile  dependence 
upon  their  employers.  (/) 

§  198.     Ecclesiastical  Jurisdiction, 

Or«g.  Dtcr.  II.  de  judictia.    BUner^  Beitrage  z.  Oescb.  dee  Inqulsftlotuproa  Lpz.  1827.    3t 
IWet;  de  jarbdicUoni<i  civ.  por  med.  aevam  com  eccL  conjanctae  orig.  et  progressu.  Monast  1882 

1.  The  clergy  could  be  tried  only  before  the  episcopal  tribunal.    Tlie 
dril  authorities  were  utterly  unable  to  enforce  their  penal  code  in  opposition 
to  the  indulgence  or  partiality  of  this  court,  except  in  those  instances  in 
^hich  the  wounded  honor  of  the  Church  itself  required  the  surrender  of 
tbft  culprit.    The  highest  ecclesiastical  penalty  was  a  hopeless  banishment  to 
a  convent,  and  sometimes  a  walling  in  of  the  culprit.    2.  The  ecclesiastical 
court  also  claimed  jurisdiction  over  all  matters  more  or  less  intimately  con- 
noted with  the  Church,  or  with  religion  in  general,  such  as  marriages, 
^Ife,  oaths,  usury,  and  all  legal  causes  relating  to  the  crusades.     In  cons^ 
'JQcnce  of  this  confusion  of  moral  and  legal  subjects,  this  court  invaded  very 
conaderably  the  sanctuary  of  the  family.    Ecclesiastical  laws  were  formed 
■gainst  nearly  all  public  offences,  and  when  might  every  where  prevailed 
•?*inst  right,  were  powerful  enough  to  extort  respect  from  those  who  would 
^ve  despised  every  human  authority.     The  cause  of  humanity  and  of 
national  rights  formed  also  a  powerful  advocate  in  the  Church  by  means  of 
^«e  penal  courts.    8.  A  few  individuals  only  arrogated  to  themselves  the 
"g^t  to  interfere  in  every  municipal  cause  when  requested  by  one  of  the 


*^/««oc.  lit  L  VI.  Ep.  12J.  IX.  180.  More  namerons  examples  can  be  fonnd  In  the  next 
P^'H  ci  g:.  Greg.  Deer.  III.  tit  6.  c  87.  comp.  Senfet%  Qesdi.  d.  deatach.  Adela  In  d.  Domcapiteln. 
^'»-  Hurter,  Innoc  vol  IIL  p.  28flL 

f)  Agobcrdj  de  privUeg.  et  jure  aaeerdotam.  p.  128w 


218  MEDIAEVAL  CHURCH  HISTORY.    FEB.  lU    A.  D.  80IMS1& 

party,  or  when  the  offence  charged  was  of  a  moral  nature  (denandatio  evan- 
gelica).*    The  ancient  custom  of  the  synodal  courts  was  gradually  restrained 

by  tlio  introduction  of  the  Homan  law. 

§  199.    Property  of  the  Church 

The  property  of  the  Church  was  continually  augmented  by  donations,  by 
bequests,  by  profitable  investments  and  loans  for  pawns  especiaDy  to  cru- 
saders, by  royal  fiefs,  by  free  proprietors  giving  to  the  Church  feudal  lordship 
over  their  possessions  to  secure  them  against  oppression,  and  by  the  increased 
value  of  property.  On  the  other  hand,  it  was  diminished  by  the  prodigality 
of  indiviilual  prelates,  which  could  not  be  checked  till,  after  a  dear-bought 
experience,  laws  wore  carefully  formed  against  all  pawning  or  alienation  of 
Church  property ;  by  the  claims  and  oppressions  of  Church  wardens,  by 
transference  of  fiefs  to  those  who  could  protect  them  and  become  their  liege 
lords,  by  expenses  for  the  support  of  legates  and  princes,  and  by  the  claims 
of  feudal  lords  upon  the  property  of  deceased  prelates,  and  upon  the  reve- 
nues of  vaciint  Church  offices  (jus  spolii  et  regaliae).  This  spoliation  of  the 
Church  was  zealously  resisted  by  the  popes.  Otho  IV.  in  Germany  was  in- 
duced to  surrender  his  claims,  but  other  sovereigns  renounced  them  only 
in  particular  instances.  Even  the  patronage  (advocatia)  of  ecclesiastical 
foundations  which  had  been  originally  intended  for  legal  and  military  pro- 
tection, and  which  had  sometimes  originated  with  the  act  of  endowmoit,  or 
had  been  conferred  upon  a  powerful  neighbor,  was  frequently  perverted,  so 
as  to  be  an  instrument  of  oppression  and  robbery,  (a)  The  prindpal  por- 
tion of  the  Church  property  consisted  of  real  estate  and  tithes.  The  legiA 
titles  by  which  the  former  was  held  were  of  various  kinds,  but  the 
latter  were  claimed  by  a  natural  law  propounded  by  God  himself,  al- 
though they  were  resisted  in  many  ways  when  fully  carried  out,  and 
were  in  collision  wiili  various  local  customs.  The  revenues  even  of  the 
pope,  in  accordance  with  peculiar  ancient  usages,  were  paid  in  articles 
of  natural  produce,  varying  in  diflTerent  places,  (h)  Surplice  fees  (jura 
stolae)  belonged  chiefly  to  the  lower  clergy,  but  were  only  voluntary 
offerings  of  the  iHJople.  Salaries  from  the  state  were  indignantly  rejected 
by  the  Church  as  dangerous  to  its  independence  and  dignity,  (c)  The  clergy 
claimed  exemption  from  all  taxes  on  persons  or  property,  with  the  exception 
of  the  feudal  aids  and  voluntary  contributions  in  cases  of  extraordinary  state 
necessity.  A  regular  assessment  was  generally  unknown  in  the  fendal 
monarchies,  but  as  late  as  the  twelfth  century  the  Church  was  often  com- 
pelled to  contribute  for  special  objects,  and  in  the  free  cities  it  had  to  bear 
its  share  in  all  general  taxes.  Alexander  III,  proclaimed  the  great  funda- 
mental principle  of  the  Church,  which  was,  that  the  clergy  might  contribute 
of  their  own  free  will  when  they  perceived  the  utility  and  necessity  of  an 


•  Gr^g.  Deer.  II.  tit  1.  c.  18.  comp.  Raumer  vol.  TI.  p.  198a. 

a)  P.  GiiUitdc,  do  advocatis  ecc.  lloldlb.  176S.   {A.  Schmidt^  Thea.  jar.  ecc.  vol.  V.)   Muratoriy 
d«advv.  ecc  (Antiqq.  ItaL  voL  V.)     W.  T.  Kraut,  die  Vonnandach.  Gott  188R.  toL  L 

b)  Cencii  Cumerarii  L.  censaum  Rom.  Ecc.  a  1192.    Comp.  Hurier.  Innoo.  toL  IIL  Pl  121ml 
e)  Dioinede*  CroDica  di  Cypro,  according  to  Eaamer  toL  YL  p.  147. 


CHAP.  in.    ECCLES.  LIFE.    §  200.  POPULAR  SPIRIT.    TRUCE  OF  GOD.       219 

assessmeiit.  (d)  The  protection  which  the  hishops  received  from  the  popes 
Against  the  demands  of  their  respective  kings,  gave  occasion  to  the  legal 
maxim,  that  the  Charch  could  never  he  taxed  without  the  papal  sanction.  X«) 
The  natural  right  of  the  clergy  to  inherit  property  was  finally  legalized  in 
spite  of  the  opposition  of  the  laity.  Every  Church  was  regarded  as  the  pro- 
per heir  of  all  ecclesiastics  who  died  intestate  in  connection  with  it.  There 
were  different  opinions  respecting  the  right  of  such  persons  to  hoqueath  their 
possessions,  but  it  was  generally  conceded  that  they  might  freely  dispose  of 
all  which  had  not  been  acquired  from  ecclesiastical  revenues.  At  an  early 
period  the  attempt  was  frequently  made  to  bequeath  the  property  of  the 
Church  to  children,  (/)  by  which  it  would  soon  have  been  either  impover- 
ished, or  subjected  to  a  sacerdotal  caste.  This  was  afterwards  frustrated  by 
the  law  which  required  the  celibacy  of  the  clergy.  In  consequence  of  the 
munificent  donations  which  it  bestowed  upon  the  poor,  the  people  were  gene^ 
rally  pleased  to  see  the  Church  in  the  possession  of  the  greatest  Avealth. 


CHAP.  III.— ECCLESIASTICAL  LIFE. 

§  200.      The  ReligiouB  Spirit  of  the  People. 

This  was  a  period  in  which  violence,  power,  and  artifice  were  enlisted  in 
the  service  of  a  rude  sensuality.  But  a  profound  religions  spirit  ardently 
engaged  in  the  pursuit  of  everlasting  life,  was  no  less  prevalent  among  the 
people.  These  tendencies  were  sometimes  in  conflict  with  each  other,  and 
sometimes  they  were  reconciled  by  the  most  remarkable  compromises.  The 
hierarchy,  addressing  itself  to  the  religious  spirit,  but  in  a  manner  conformed 
to  the  age,  endeavored  to  establish  the  ascendency  of  the  law  and  of  an  ele- 
vated morality.  A  period  in  which  brute  force  (Faust-recht)  was  the  only 
law,  was  interrupted  by  one  in  which  the  Truce  of  Ood  was  sustained  by 
ecclesiastical  threatenings  and  miracles,  {a)  Women  and  children,  defence- 
less persons,  and  every  thing  constructed  or  planted  for  purposes  of  peace, 
were  in  times  of  war  under  the  protection  of  the  Church.  (5)  It  offered  an 
asylum  to  all  who  were  persecuted,  without  inquiring  whether  they  were 
pnrsued  by  lawless  violence  or  justice.  Violent  persons  were  terrified  by 
frightful  representations  of  a  present  God,  and  by  narratives  of  divine  judg- 
ments ;  and  when  those  who  possessed  great  power  became  penitent,  they 
were  compelled  to  undergo  the  most  severe  and  eflfective  penances.  The 
tenth  century  is  remarkable  for  having  been  the  most  degraded  of  all  these 
periods  for  its  reckless  struggles  and  general  rapacity.  A  vague  presentiment 
of  death,  a  remnant  of  the  pagan  notion  of  the  Twilight  of  the  gods,  (c)  passed 

d)  Cone  LaUr.  III.  c  19.  {Manti  Th.  XXIL  p.  22a) 
t)  Cane.  iMUr.  IV.  c.  46.  (5fanH  Th.  XXIL  p.  1080.) 

/)  E.  g.  Bfned.  VIII.  about  1014  in  Cone  Tlcinensl.  {Manai  Th.  XIX  p.  843.) 
a)  Trcuga  Dei,  first  proclaimed  in  1041  in  AquiUnia.    Olaber  Badulph.  Y.  1.  {Bouquet  Th.-X. 
y.  69.)    Mansi  Tli.  XIX.  p.  59a        b)  Jqff,  p.  682. 

e)  Oompi  Mu9piUL,  edit  by  Bohmeller,  Manlch.  1S82. 


220  MEDIAEVAL  CHUECU  HISTOEY.    PEE.  III.    A.  D.  800-]91flL 

• 

through  the  yoathfal  nations,  and  fixed  upon  the  close  of  the  first  millennium 
of  the  Christian  era  as  the  period  for  the  end  of  the  world,  (d)  But  new 
life  was  awakened  hy  the  conflict  with  the  Saracens  in  Spain,  as  well  as 
hy  their  heroic  example.  The  struggle  between  the  papacy  and  the  mon- 
archies of  that  period  contributed  also  to  the  same  result.  The  pleasures 
of  the  world  were  principally  eigoyed  by  the  nobihty  and  clergy.  An 
independent  estate  of  burghers,  if  it  did  not  always  contend  for  publio 
freedom  and  justice,  certainly  strove  to  obtain  special  liberties  and  preroga- 
tives for  themselves.  In  accordance  with  both  the  tendencies  above  men- 
tioned, the  female  sex  was  regarded  with  extravagant  admiration,  or  as  frail 
and  dangerous.  The  peculiar  spirit  of  the  age  was  fully  developed  in  the 
crusades.  In  them  was  displayed  the  absolute  ascendency  of  the  imagination 
and  the  feelings.  Human  life  became  so  corrupted  that  it  degenerated  into 
a  coarse  sensual  existence,  or  an  ideal  struggle  for  something  beyond  human 
attainment.  All  the  peculiarities  of  the  European  nations  were  amalgamated 
with  each  other,  or  combined  with  the  fanciful  speculations  of  the  East.  The 
contracted  horizon  to  which  the  people  had  been  accustomed  became  much 
enlarged,  and  it  was  not  without  serious  injury  to  themselves  that  many 
walked  beneath  the  lofty  palm-trees,  (e)  This  sensuous  piety  required  and 
put  confidence  in  all  kinds  of  miracles.  The  sepulchres  of  the  East  were 
opened,  and  the  sacred  antiquity  of  the  Church  became  realized  once  more 
in  the  present,  by  means  of  peculiar  relics,  whose  genuineness  tlie  understand- 
ing would  no  more  think  of  proving  than  it  would  venture  to  suspect  the 
miracles  by  which  they  were  certified  to  the  faithful.  Many  vessels  and 
emblems,  gradually  or  accidentally  invested  with  a  sacred  character,  received 
at  that  time  a  place  in  the  primitive  ecclesiastical  usage  by  means  of  the 
legends,  or  became  connected  with  the  old  German  popular  traditions.  {/) 
Superstition  was  especially  congenial  with  the  spirit  of  the  age,  and  the  hier- 
archy made  it  subservient  to  their  purposes,  increasing  or  diminishing  it 
according  as  their  interests  prompted  them.  As  instances  of  the  latter,  may 
be  mentioned  their  opposition  to  the  ordeals  or  judgments  of  God,  especially 
by  duels,  ((n)  While  God  was  brought  down  to  the  level  of  humanity,  men 
were  invested  with  the  attributes  of  God.  Ancient  saints  were  once  more 
discovered,  and  the  present  age  felt  competent  even  to  create  new  saints. 
The  ardent  feelings  of  the  people  prompted  them  to  pray  even  to  a  dog,  as  a 
martyr  and  a  patron  saint,  because  he  had  lost  his  life  in  behalf  of  his  master's 
child,  (h)  The  Mother  of  God,  however,  was  above  all  other  saints  the 
object  of  chivalrous  gallantry.    But  notwithstanding  the  profound  veneration 


d)  Ahho  AhbfU  Fhriac  Apologet  {Galland.  Blbl.  PP.  Th.  XIV.  p.  141.)  In  a  variety  of  ways 
in  decKls  of  gift  then  madew    Comp.  Lucke^  Einl.  in  d.  Offenb.  Joh.  Bonn.  1S82.  p.  5148. 

e)  Comp.  PUicidm  Muth,  Dlsq.  In  blgamiam  Comlt  de  Glelchen.  Erf.  1788.  Thilow,  Beachr.  d. 
Grabcs  u.  d.  Gebelne  d.  Or.  v.  GL  u.  seiner  bolden  Wclber.  Goth.  u.  Erf.  1S86. 

/)  Comp.  G.  Gerberon,  Ilist  de  la  robe  sans  couture  da  monast  d'ArgenteuiL  Par.  1«T7. 
J.  3fanr,  Qetch.  d.  h.  Koclis.  Treves.  1944  J.  Gildemei*ter  u.  H.  v.  Sybel,  d.  h.  Rock  lu  Trier  n. 
d.  20  andern  h.  ungenuliten  Ruclie.  Dusseld.  (1R44.)  8.  ed.  1S45.— Uer  ungenohto  grauo  Rock 
Christl.  Altdentsches  Gedicbt,  edit  by  F.  IT.  r.  d.  Ilagen^  Berlin.  1S44 

g)  Cone.  Valentinum  III.  a.  855.  c  11. 12.  {ManH  Th.  XV.  p.  9.)  Innoe.  ITT.  I  XL  Ep.  4«.  I 
XIV.  Ep.  138,  • 

h)  Steph.  de  Borhone^  in  EcJuird^  Scrr.  Praed.  toI.  L  p.  198^  ■ 


CHAP.  IIL    ECCLK9.  LIFE.    §  201.  CLEBQY.    DUNBTAN.  221 

in  which  the  Church  was  held,  the  exuberant  spirit  of  the  age  sometimes  ex- 
ceeded the  limits  of  its  own  due  reverence.  Accordingly  the  devil,  in  spite 
of  all  his  dismal  enchantments  and  temptations,  generally  appears  in  popular 
traditions  as  a  very  poor  and  simple  being.  The  wanton  spirit  of  the  trou- 
badours sometimes  ventured  to  treat  with  familiarity  the  sacred  person  of 
the  holy  Virgin  and  even  of  God  the  Father.  The  priests  themselves  in  an 
innocent  way  sometimes  made  parodies  of  the  holy  mysteries  and  offices  of 
the  Church  at  their  festivals  of  fools  and  asses,  (i) 

§  201.    Manners  of  the  Clergy, 

According  to  the  feudal  law  of  Germany  the  bishops  were  bound  to  ap- 
pear personally  with  their  quota  of  men  in  the  army  of  their  liege  lord.    On 
the  other  hr»nd  they  were  carefully  reminded  by  the  popes  that  they  sliould 
devote  themselves  to  the  work  of  preaching,  and  to  the  care  of  souls,  and 
that  the  Church  should  abstain  with  horror  from  the  shedding  of  blood  in  all 
its  forms,  (a)    We  are  therefore  not  surprised  to  find  such  a  character  as  that 
of  Chris tian,  Bishop  of  Mentz^  the  heroic,  learned,  and  rapacious  general  of 
the  emperor  Frederic,  who  slew  his  enemies  with  a  club,  (h)    But  even  those 
bishops  who  were  more  spiritual  in  their  dispositions  were  sometimes  com- 
pelled to  become  leaders  of  armies,  and  as  soon  as  they  had  administered  the 
Holy  Sacrament  to  their  warriors  they  were  called  upon  also  to  prepare  them 
for  the  battle,  (c)   What  was  called  simony  was  in  some  instances  only  the  cus- 
tomary tribute  given  to  the  princes  and  to  the  popes  soon  after  the  time  of 
Gregory.     Even  the  better  portion  of  the  clergy  could  not  entirely  abstain 
from  this,  but  as  it  was  i)roscribed  by  the  Church  it  was  ensnaring  to  the 
eoQscience.     In  England,  Dunstan  (d.  about  990),  an  abbot  and  a  triple 
bishop,  versed  in  all  the  knowledge  prevalent  in  his  day,  so  powerful  that  he 
held  even  the  devil  in  his  tongs,  and  though  personally  devoted  to  his  own 
Tisions  in  worldly  matters,  so  politic  that  he  entirely  controlled  three  succes- 
fiive  kings,  and  broke  the  heart  of  another  who  presumed  to  resist  him, 
attempted  to  reform  the  voluptuous  lives  of  the  priesthood  by  putting  his 
monks  in  the  place  of  those  clergymen  who  would  not  give  up  their  wives,  {d) 
His  efforts,  however,  were  attended  by  no  very  la.«*ting  results.    Damiani^ 
who  with  Ilildebrand  was  a  severe  censor  of  the  manners  of  his  age  and  even 
of  the  papacy,  and  who  desired  nothing  from  the  world  but  a  monastic  cell  in 
which  he  could  scourge  himself,  presents  in  his  writings  such  a  naked  and  vivid 
picture  of  the  excesses  of  the  clergy,  that  Alexander  II.  prohibited  the  peru- 
sal of  them  on  the  ground  of  their  injurious  influence  upon  the  morals  of  the 


0  Tbe  hierarchy  were  at  flnit  zealous  against  these  sports,  bnt  gradually  they  relaxed  in  their 
W>ilUon,  and  at  a  later  p«iod  attempted  to  Improve  them.  Du  FreVM^  Oloss.  ad  8crr.  med.  et 
''^  l4t  y.  Cervula.  Calendae.  TUiot,  M^moiros  pour  senrir  4  Thlstoire  de  la  f£te  dea  foux. 
^1T5L 

a)  Damiani  1.  IV.  Epi  9.  Cone.  Turon.  a.  1060.  c  7. 

*)  Albert  Stadens.  p.  291a  (Schllteri  Scrr.  Argent  1T02.) 

«)  &  Vlricl  Vita  in  JIalnllon  Acta  SS.  8aec  IV.  p.  440. 

^  VlUcinM^  Cone.  AngL  vol.  L  p.  257ss.  G.  Malrntsbir.  Qesta  Reg.  AngL  L  IL  ViU  8.  Ihinst, 
^  Wortt  ct  O^bom  :  Acta  88.  Mi\j.  voL  IV.  p.  844.  MabiUon,  Ann.  Ord.  8.  Bcned.  vol.  IIL  p. 
«4« 


t 

222  MEDIAEVAL  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  lU.    A.  D.  800-18HL 

recoders.  (e)  Man-iago  was  not  declared  unlawftil  to  the  clergy  in  England 
and  Spain  until  the  twelfth  century,  and  in  the  Northern  kingdoms  till  some 
time  in  the  thirteenth.  Some  even  died  because  they  could  not  endure  this 
separation  from  their  wives  and  children.  But  although  Gregory  succeeded 
in  abolishing  marriage,  he  could  not  prevent  licentiousness  among  the  clergy. 
Before  his  time  this  had  prevailed  publicly,  but  in  a  less  offensive  form, 
whereas  after  his  enactments  it  was  practised  in  secret,  and  frequently  in  the 
most  unnatural  manner,  so  that  many  regarded  the  remedy  as  worse  than  the 
evil.  The  clergy  partook  also  of  the  faults  peculiar  to  the  times,  and  were 
sometimes  involved  in  the  most  shameless  acts  of  violence.  (/)  But  such  in- 
dividual instances  of  irregularity  among  the  bishops,  or  of  criminality  among 
the  clergy,  which  were  generally  put  down  in  the  Church  after  the  influence 
of  Hildebrand  had  been  put  forth,  should  not  be  regarded  as  specimens  of  the 
general  character  of  that  period,  (ff)  The  declamations  which  are  sometimes 
found  in  the  writings  of  that  day,  respecting  clerical  depravity,  in  many 
cases  proceeded  from  monastic  prejudices  or  secular  antipathies.  (A)  The 
clergy  must  also  have  participated  in  the  virtues  of  that  period,  for  withont 
these  their  increasing  influence  among  the  people  would  appear  incomprehen- 
sible. This  consciousness  of  control  over  the  age  in  which  they  lived,  and 
the  true  conception  which  they  possessed  of  what  a  clergyman  should  be, 
contributed  much  to  elevate  even  the  inferior  multitude  of  priests  above  their 
ordinary  position  and  made  them  share  in  the  common  spirit  of  their  order. 

§  202.     Church  Diseipline.     Comp.  §  66.  182. 

Eua,  Amort  de  origfne,  progressa  ac  flmcta  indulgentiar.  Ang.  Vind.  \lZb.  t 

By  the  great  body  of  the  people,  the  act  of  binding  and  loosing  on  the 
part  of  the  priest  was  regarded  as  equivalent  to  an  admission  to  heaven,  or  an 
exchision  from  it.  Even  death,  which  sunders  all  other  ties,  was  supposed  to 
bring  men  more  perfectly  under  this  influence.  Conscientious  clergymen  were 
often  distressed  in  the  exercise  o{  a  power  which  extended  even  beyond  the 
grave,  and  eminent  theologians  arrayed  themselves  in  opposition  to  this 
error,  (a)  The  synodal  courts,  when  they  had  become  corrupt,  imposed  fines 
upon  offenders,  or  consented  that  the  ecclesiastical  penance  should  be  dis- 
charged by  the  payment  of  alms,  of  which  the  Church  was  to  be  the  dispen- 
ser. Penitential  books  were  formed  in  which  a  choice  of  penances  was  pro- 
posed, and  a  kind  of  price  current  was  kept  for  all  kinds  of  crime.  (6)  The 
popes  were  generally  supposed  to  possess  a  peculiar  power  of  absolving  from 
the  guilt  of  the  more  heinous  crimes,  and  they  made  use  of  this  public  con- 
fidence very  extensively  when  they  sold  complete  absolution^  professing  to 
devote  the  proceeds  to  the  relief  of  the  crusaders.    Particular  sanctuaries 


€)  Liber  Gomorrblanua.  Epp.  II,  6.  0pp.  den.  ed.  Oaetani^  Par.  1T48.  Life  of  Dam.  by  bis  pupil 
Jo.  Monachita  In  0pp.  and  AcU  8S.  Febr.  vol.  IIL  p.  406.— VIU  S.  Danu  scr.  J.  LadercMo^  Rom. 
1702.  8  voK  4. 

/)  E.  g.  Lambert  Schajh.  ad  a.  1063.      g)  E.  g.  Hurter,  Innoc  vol  IIL  p.  8«7ss. 

h)  Wltb  respect  to  the  former,  see  Damian,  and  witb  regard  to  tbe  latter,  the  songB  at  the  Trou- 
badours and  MInne«IngerflL 

a)  Fetrut  Lonib,  8entt  L.  IV.  Dlst  1&    I)  Regino,  de  dlao.  eoc.  n,  4888a. 


CHAP.  IIL    KCCLES.  LIFE.    $  202.  DISCIPLINE.    $  208.  WOESHIP.  223 

also  were  invested  with  the  privilege  of  bestowing  absolution  on  condition 
of  a  certain  period  of  penance,  to  all  who  should  visit  them,  either  on  some 
festival  or  at  any  time,  (e)    A  period  of  penance  which  might  ordinarily  ex- 
ceed the  limits  of  human  life  might  be  accomplished  in  a  brief  space  of  time 
by  means  of  the  two  kinds  of  absolution.    Persons  who  were  in  a  high 
degree  the  victims  of  remorse  were  required  to  build  a  church,  to  go  upon  a 
crosade,  or  to  enter  a  convent.    In  all  cases  when  services  were  performed, 
or  money  was  paid  to  obtain  such  a  pardon  for  sin,  a  cordial  repentance  and 
*tn  amendment  of  life  was  made  a  prerequisite  in  the  applicant.    Intelligent 
teachers,  however,  perceived  that  the  Church  was  placing  itself  in  a  position 
of  extreme  peril.  (<f)    According  to  an  opinion  which  had  now  become  es- 
tablished, but  was  still  opposed  in  some  quarters,  a  mortal  sin  could  be  for- 
given only  in  the  confessional.    The  Church  required  that  at  least  once  in 
each  year  every  person  should  confess  all  the  sins  of  which  he  was  conscious,  (e) 
By  this  means  the  priests  became  possessed  of  all  the  hearts  and  secrets  of 
the  people.    The  interdict  which  had  been  on  several  occasions  attempted  in 
former  times,  but  had  been  always  regarded  as  an  arbitrary  exercise  of  an 
unchristian  power,  became  during  the  eleventh  century  a  legitimate  measure 
in  opposition  to  those  who  violated  solenm  treaties.    It  soon  after  became  a 
terrible  weapon  in  the  hands  of  the  popes  by  which  a  nation  was  compelled 
to  atOtae  for  the  crimes  of  its  rulers,  or  was  armed  against  those  in  authority 
over  it.    When  tlie  Gharch  possessed  a  powerful  influence  over  the  life  of 
every  one,  no  people  patiently  endured  a  protracted  discontinuance  of  eccle- 
siastical services,  and  frequently  they  did  not  hesitate  to  compel  their  clergy 
to  open  their  churches  for  public  worship.    Innocent  also  obtained  a  promise 
that  every  one  whom  he  should  excommunicate  should  be  subjected  in  like 
manner  to  the  ban  of  the  empire,  but  such  an  engagement  it  was  found  im- 
possible always  to  fulfiL 

§  208.     Public  Warship. 

Walafrid  SUmbo^  died  849,  de  exordiis  et  Increm.  rer.  ecc  /ro,  died  1115,  Micrologus  de  ecc.  ob- 
■crntt  (Both  fuand  in  HiU&rp.  see  $  166.)  J.  BfUth,  about  1182,  div.  officior.  brevis  expllc.  ed. 
Cbm.  LauHmann.  ADto.  1658.  O.  Durantt,  dlod  1296,  EaUonale  div.  officior.  I  Till.  Mog.  1497.  t 
nd  often. 

The  WeMohrunnen  prayer,  a  monument  of  the  ancient  language  and  piety 
of  Germany,  contains  an  exalted  poetical  representation  of  the  antemundane 
existence  of  God,  and  an  humble  supplication  for  spiritual  blessings,  (a) 
Bat  the  sensuous  disposition  of  the  people  was  necessarily  predominant. 
In  consequence  of  the  sensuous  tendency  then  so  prevalent,  public  wor- 
^ip  appeared  to  be  little  else  than  a  worship  of  the  saints.  Preaching  was 
^^^j  an  essential  part  of  the  service  on  public  festivals,  although  several 
•ynoda  and  popes  endeavored  to  introduce  into  churches  only  those  who  were 
»ble  to  instruct  the  people,  and  the  popularity  of  those  preachers  who  dis- 
coarsed  in  an  affecting  style,  proved  that  the  multitude  were  susceptible  of 

«)  Gompi  Qmc  LaUratL  lY.  c.  6S.    {ManH  Tli.  XXII.  p.  1050&) 

<0  AMardi  Etbica  a  18.  80.    (PetU  Anecd.  Tb.  III.  P.  L  p.  666Bai 

•)  Cone.  Lateran.  lY.  a  21.    {ManH  Tb.  XXII.  p.  IOOTssl) 

a)  Aceordinf  to  the  eztnota  hj  Wackernigel  CBrL  1827.)  in  B0ttberg,  toL  XL  p.  818^ 


224  MEDIAEVAL  CUUKCH  HISTORY.    PER.  IIL    A.  D.  800-12HL 

benefit  from  the  Word  of  God.  (h)  The  use  of  the  Roman  Liturgy  was  re- 
quired in  all  the  churches  as  the  visible  bond  of  general  unity.  The  GotMe 
Liturgy,  although  it  was  protected  by  an  affectionate  people,  and  had  even 
passed  the  ordeal  of  fire,  was  gradually  suppressed  in  Spain  after  the  eleventh 
century,  (c)  The  Sabbath  was  especially  devoted  to  the  service  of  the  Vir- 
gin Mary,  in  whose  honor  a  particular  service  was  composed  principally  by 
Damian  (Officium  S.  Virginis)  to  be  performed  in  the  convents.  When 
Paschasius  Eadbert^  a  monk  and  (844-851)  an  abbot  at  Corvey  (d.  ^jyoxit 
865),  maintained  that  the  virginity  of  Mary  was  unimpaired  even  by  the 
birth  of  the  Son  of  God,  the  learned  divines  of  his  day  shrunk  from  the 
position  as  containing  a  Docetic  sentiment,  (d)  That  every  thing  might  be 
removed  which  could  throw  the  slightest  suspicion  upon  the  vir^n  purity  of 
the  Queen  of  heaveti,  the  doctrine  was  finally  set  forth  according  to  which 
she  also  was  conceived  in  a  miraculous  manner,  and  some  canons  of  Lyons 
(about  1140)  solemnized  this  faith  by  fnstituting  the  festival  of  the  ImmacUf 
late  Conception,  St.  Bernard,  however,  and  all  learned  theologians  of  that 
period  were  opposed  to  this  innovation,  {e)  In  popular  traditions  many 
pleasant  things  which  had  been  told  of  the  goddess  Freyja  were  transferred 
to  Mary.  (/)  A  festival  of  All  Souls  (Nov.  2)  for  the  deliverance  of  thoee 
who  were  confined  in  purgatory  was  also  established  by  the  monks  of  Olagny 
(1010),  who  obtained  a  hint  from  the  popular  tradition  asserting  that  the 
gate  of  purgatory  was  in  one  of  the  volcanoes  of  the  Lipari  islands,  (y)  Some 
time  after  the  ninth  century  the  practice  extended  from  Rome  to  the  provinces^ 
of  observing  St.  Gregory'^s  day^  as  a  festival  for  schoolboys,  derived  from  the 
old  Minervan  festival.  Qi)  Among  the  sacred  usages  of  the  Church  tlie  Sa- 
craments gradually  became  remarkably  prominent,  and  the  representation  of 
them  as  the  signs  and  actual  communications  of  divine  grace,  as  well  as  their 
number  seven,  so  divided  as  to  sanctify  all  the  important  relations  of  human 
life,  were  especially  defended  and  established  by  Peter  Lombard  and 
Gratia n.  (i)  The  baptism  of  infants  could  be  postponed  without  giving  of- 
fence. (I)  That  abuses  might  be  avoided,  those  children  who  had  not  been 
confirmed  were  (12th  century)  kept  back  from  participation  in  the  Lord^s 
Supper,  and  when  many  other  attempts  had  been  made  to  render  the  wastiDg 
of  the  least  particle  of  the  divine  blood  impossible,  the  laity  were  entirely 
debarred  from  participation  in  the  sacred  cup.  The  doctrine  of  the  presence 
of  the  entire  Christ  in  the  bread  was  defended,  and  the  powerftd  influence  of 


b)  Cone  Mogunt  a.  847.  c.  2.  ( J/tifwf  Th.  XIV.  p.  908.)    Cone  Latemn.  IV.  <x  lOi.  (/&.  It, 
XXIL  p.  9988.)    Jacobi  a  Vitriaco  Ulst  ocdd.  c.  6s8. 

c)  RodeHco  Tolet  de  reb.  HIsp.  VI,  2G. 

d)  Rairamni  L.  de  eo,  quod  Cbr,  e$  vlrglne  natns  est  {D^Ac7i«ryy  Splcileg.  Th.  I.  p.  68.)   Fr. 
WalcAy  II.  controv.  8.  IX.  de  parta  Virginia.  Goet  17&S.  4. 

e)  Ant.  GravoUf  de  ortu  ct  progreasa  cultua  ao  fesU  Immaculati  conceptaa  Dei  Geiictzld&  IJBC 
17C2.  4. 

/)  Orimm,  Dentscbe  MyUioL  pp.  192,  417,  694.  XX. 

g)  Jotsaldi  ViU  8.  Odilon.  c.  14.  {Mabillon,  Acta  83.  8.  VI.  P.  L  p.  615.)  Sigeb.  OemU.  ad  a.  999L 
A)  A.  Weber,  Origo  fcstl  Or.  HImst  1714.  4.    Miru8y  de  Gr.  M.  et  feato  Qr.  P.  IL  lUinst  1768. 4 
Mucke,  V,  Urejir.  d.  Gr.  Fester  Guben.  179a. 
€)  PeU  Loml.  Sent  IV.  DIst  1-42. 
k)  Petri  de  Vineis,  L  UL  £p.  21.    BdUigw  Ileinr.  d.  L5we.  Amn.  68. 


CHAP.  IIL    ECCLES.  LIFE.    §  208.  MARRIAGE.    S  204.  MONASTIC  LIFE.       225 

the  priesthood  maiDtained  this  cnstom  of  withholding  the  cup  against  all  sub- 
seqaent  opposition.  (/)    The  solitary  mass  of  the  priest  was  at  first  decidedly 
reprehended,  (m)    In  the  tenth  century  adultery  continued  to  be  regarded  by 
the  popes  as  a  sufficient  ground  for  divorce,  but  the  ecclesiastical  view  of  the 
marriage  rite  was  completely  carried  out  when  it  was  soon  after  declared  ab- 
solutely inviolable,  and  Innocent  III.  insisted  upon  the  reunion  of  husband 
and  wife,  even  after  a  double  adultery  had  been  proved.     Human  frailty, 
however,  was  supplied  with  abundant  opportunities  for  sundering  this  bond 
by  means  of  the  prohibition  of  all  marriages  between  relatives,  even  of  the 
seventh  degree,  since  such  a  consanguinity  was  very  generally  proved  when 
it  was  desirable.    Innocent  limited  the  degrees  of  relationship  within  which 
marriage  was  invalid,  to  four,  and  in  fact  regarded  even  these  limits  as  pre- 
scribed only  by  human  and  natural  laws,  (it) 

§  204.     Monastic  Life. 

The  convents  were  regarded  in  the  ninth  century  as  the  hereditary  fiefs 
of  the  secular  lords,  under  whose  control  they  were  more  perfectly  wasted 
and  mL^govemed,  than  by  the  irruptions  of  the  Normans.  («)     But  the  ex- 
alteil  contempt  of  the  world  displayed  in  the  monastic  life  corresponded  with 
the  spirit  of  the  times.    Some  who  from  their  youth  had  never  become 
attached  to  the  enjoyments  of  the  world,  felt  the  need  of  such  a  pious  seclu- 
sion and  fellowship.     Others  felt  the  same  necessity  after  the  agitation  of  a 
wdden  conversion,  or  that  they  might  make  an  atonement  in  this  way  for  the 
flnsof  an  irregular  life.   Sitnultmeously,  therefore,  with  the  newly  awakened 
energies  of  tte  people,  and  the  general  movement  of  multitudes  in  favor  of 
corporations,  a  series  of  successful  efforts  were  put  forth  fo  attain  the  proper 
objects  of  the  convent  by  a  renewal  and  completion  of  the  Benedictine  rule. 
Tbe  abbots,  sustained  by  papal  privileges  and  royal  fiefs,  were  favorable  to 
the  party  of  the  bishops  and  princes.     The  popular  element  of  the  Church, 
however,  was  especially  maintained  in  the  convents,  and  it  was  through  these 
that  Gregory  was  enabled  to  obtain  his  victory.    Monasticism,  though  fre- 
q'lemly  arrayed  in  opposition  to  particular  individuals  among  the  clergy,  was 
^Mj  allied  to  the  general  body ;  and  on  account  of  its  exemption  from  epis- 
copal supervision  it  was  generally  in  the  immediate  service  of  the  pope. 
After  the  tenth  century  it  was  regarded  as  a  peculiarly  spiritual  order  (ordo 
^  the  religiosi),  which,  however,  made  use  of  lay  brethren  (conversi),  to 
attend  to  their  secular  affairs.    In  this  way  the  larger  Benedictine  convents 
'^ed  on  within  themselves  all  the  mechanical  arts,  at  any  time  needed  in 
^ra,  especially  those  connected  with  masonry.    The  seclusion  necessary  for 
the  convent  was  sometimes  obtained  even  in  the  cities,  but  the  spot  best 


'■■  /  G.  ds  LitK,  (le  ailoratlone  pants  consocr.  ct  intcrdlctlono  callcis.  Suob.  )7T8.  Spittler^  Ocacb. 
*•  Ktlcbs  Im  Abendm.  Leingo.  17S0. 

■*)  Cone  Jtfgunt.  a.  Sia  c  43. 

•)  Ifo  yjL  EpL  ad  Eberbard.  {Arentini  AnnaL  Bojor.  IV,  23.)  Comp.  G.  W.  Bohmer,  Q.  d.  Ehe- 
^■'•^  Im  Zcltalt  CarK  d.  Or.  u.  solnor  nfichst  Nachfolgor.  OotL  IS^Q.—Innoc  I/I.  L  I.  Ep,  143. 
^  h  T5.  XI.  Ep.  101.     Cone.  LaUran.  IV.  c.  50^2. 

"•  Epbcopor.  Ep.  ad  Ludov.  a.  363.  c  a  ( WalUr  Tb.  IIL  pt  86t)  Cone  Troslejan.  a  909.  c  a 
'*»«^Th.XVlII.i>.270a) 

15 


226  MEDIAEVAL  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  IIL    A.  D.  800-12101 

adapted  for  it  was  generally  found  in  some  beautiful  wilderness.  It  then  fre- 
quently became  the  central  point  for  all  the  business  of  the  surrounding 
region.  Sometimes  convents  were  erected  upon  soil  which  had  been  stained 
with  blood,  or  some  sentimental  legends  were  connected  with  their  gloomy 
walls,  (h)  The  uniform  of  the  cloister  which  was  at  first  nearly  the  same 
with  the  ordinary  dress  of  the  peojile,  was  gradually  changed,  until  it  became 
the  peculiar  habit  of  the  order.  The  enlargement  or  diminution  of  the  pro- 
perty of  convents  was  produced  by  the  same  causes  as  those  which  affected 
Church  property  in  general,  but  inheritance  from  the  monks  was  tlu  ordi- 
nary, and  the  cultivation  of  the  desert  soil  was  the  noblest  method  by  which 
wealth  was  acquired.  In  consequence  of  the  rigidity  of  their  rules  and  the 
sanctity  of  their  founders,  many  of  these  orders  rapidly  increased  in  numbers, 
and  became  soon  involved  in  the  Inconsistency  of  having  devoted  themselves 
to  poverty,  and  yet  being  in  the  enjoyment  of  immense  wealth.  Monks  and 
nuns  sometimes  resided  under  the  same  roof  (monasterium  duplex.)  The 
secret  sins  or  the  public  oflfences  of  individuals  and  of  whole  convents,  are 
only  occasionally  mentioned,  and  then  only  because  they  were  brought  before 
the  ecclesiastical  courts.  In  the  establishment  of  monasteries  the  Church 
allowed  the  various  dispositions  of  individuals  to  be  gratified,  and  only  pro- 
vided by  their  legislation  that  these  diversities  should  ail  be  confined  withiu 
the  limits  required  by  the  general  objects  of  the  order.  And  when  the 
monastic  life  had  assumed  a  great  variety  of  individual  forms,  and  appeared 
to  have  taken  every  possible  shape.  Innocent  III.  prohibited  the  formation 
of  any  new  orders,  (c) 

§  205.     7%tf  Congregation  of  Clugny. 

Bihliothtea  Cluniacensis.  In  qua  S9.  Patram  Abbatura  Vitais  miracula,  scripta  rec  Parts.  1611 1 
The  Ordo  Clun.  was  accarately  dpscribed  In  the  11th  cent  by  Bernard  who  Mun^cd  to  It  (Vetoa 
discipL  monast  ed.  IlerrgoU,  Par.  1726.  4.  p.  133.)  The  Antiquiore^  Contu^U,  Clun.  1.  IIL  by  €1- 
ricK,  one  of  the  order  1070,  has  preserved  a  good  representation  of  affairs  at  Ilirsan.  {D^Achsry^  Spt- 
oil.  vol.  I.  p.  Ml.)—BemonU  Vita.  (JfubUlon,  AcU  S9.  8.  V.  p.  66.)  Odonis  VIU  by  his  pupil  Jo- 
hannes, i/b.  p.  150.)  OdilonU  Vita  by  his  pupil  JoUalduSy  {lb.  S.  VL  p.  597.)— &  WUhslmi  Constt. 
Hicrsaugiens.  {Uerrgoti,  p.  875.) 

The  rule  of  Benedict  had  been  re-established  by  Bemo,  one  of  the  family 
of  the  Burgundian  Counts,  in  two  of  the  monasteries  under  his  control. 
Being  invited  by  William^  Duke  of  Aquitania,  to  form  a  convent  after  the 
same  model,  he  founded  that  of  Clugny  (Cluniacum,  910),  and  placed  it 
under  the  immediate  supervision  of  the  pope.  His  successor,  Odo  (927-41), 
who  had  been  a  monk  in  his  habits  even  before  taking  the  monastic  vow,  was 
well  acquainted  with  the  true  method  of  governing  the  minds  of  men.  A 
rule  of  discipline  was  formed  under  him,  which,  by  severe,  uninterrupted, 
mechanical  employments  of  a  religious  nature,  so  completely  destroyed  all 
individuality  of  feeling,  that  the  ecclesiastical  and  monastic  spirit  became 
exclusively  active  in  the  hearts  of  the  members.  Under  Odilo  (994-1048), 
who  has  been  called  the  Archangel  of  the  monks,  and  during  the  administra- 

V)  E.  g.  the  priory  of  the  deuao  amoureuw  at  Rouen,  see  ITeiyot^  vol  II.  pw  471. 
c)  Cone.  Lauran  IV.  c  181  {ManH  Th.  XXIL  p.  1002a.) 


CHAP.  IIL    ECCLES.  LIFK.    f  206.  CLUGNY.    $  206.  ORAMMONT.  227 

tion  of  a  series  of  abbots,  whose  inflexible  good  sense  never  Allowed  them  to 
act  inconsistently  with  their  monastic  sanctity,  most  of  the  convents  in 
France,  carried  away  with  the  nniversal  admiration,  or  compelled  by  their 
princes  or  protectors,  became  subject  to  the  rule  and  government  of  the  con- 
gregation of  Clugny.  This  gave  rise  to  a  Congregation  of  Benedictines, 
which  iQ  the  middle  of  the  twelfth  century  embraced  about  2000  convents, 
principally  in  France.  At  the  head  of  these  was  placed  the  Abbot  of  Clugny, 
always  chosen  by  the  monks  of  his  own  convent,  from  whose  ranks  also  he 
almost  invariably  selected  the  priors  of.  all  the  convents  belonging  to  the 
congregation.  The  legislative  and  su{>crvisory  powers  were  vested  in  a 
General  Chapter  which  assembled  annually  at  Clugny.  The  very  heart  of 
the  French  nation  was  in  the  hands  of  the  monks  of  Clugny,  until  about  the 
commencement  of  the  12th  century,  when  the  order  withdrew  from  public 
affairs  and  lived  upon  its  own  resources.  An  instance  of  a  reformation  in  the 
midst  of  extreme  disorder  was  exhibited  in  Germany,  when  the  congregation 
ciHinau  was  established  there  (1069)  by  the  Abbot  William  after  the  model 
of  that  of  Clugny. 

§  206.    Minor  Orders  of  the  Uth  Century. 

1.  In  the  wilderness  of  the  Apennine  mountains  were  established  two  or- 
ders of  monks,  originally  composed  of  hermits,  but  gradually  connected  with 
convents.  Tlie  first  of  these  was  called  the  Order  of  Camaldvli,  and  was 
founded  (about  1018)  by  the  pious  zeal  of  Romuald^  one  of  the  family  of  the 
Doke  of  Kavenna.  The  second  was  called  the  Order  of  Vallomhrosa,  and 
originated  (about  1038)  in  the  rigid  austerity  of  John  Oualbert,  a  Florentine. 
The  membera  of  these  orders  vowed  that  they  would  abstain  even  from  or- 
<iinary  intellectual  enjoyments,  and  from  all  conversation  with  their  fellow- 
men.  At  a  later  period,  however,  they  endeavored  to  reconcile  this  con- 
tempt of  the  world,  and  self-mortification,  with  the  enjoyment  of  tlic  vast 
posBessions  acquired  by  the  orders,  (a)  2.  Stephen  of  Tifjerno  was  unwilling  to 
be  regarded  either  as  a  monk  or  a  hennit,  and  acknowlcdj^ed  no  rule  but  that 
of  the  gospel.  With  the  sanction  of  Gre-rory  (1073)  he  founded  an  order 
mbsequently  called  by  the  name  of  Grammont.  This  determined  to  relin- 
qniah  its  own  beloved  convent  rather  than  to  defend  a  just  claim  by  a  legal 
proceo,  and  even  sincerely  declined  the  honor  of  the  miracles  imputed  to  its 
illostrious  founder,  because  it  thought  such  a  reputation  would  be  prejudicial 
to  humility.  After  a  rapid  growth,  however,  it  was  powerfully  agitated  by 
fisputee  between  its  monks  and  those  lay  brethren,  who,  according  to  the 
Rale,  had  the  charge  of  its  secidar  affairs.  The  result  was  that  in  the  12th 
eentury  it  entirely  lost  its  indei>endence.  (h)  3.  Bruno  of  Cologne^  the  rector 
cf  the  cathedral  school  and  a  Chancellor  at  Rheims,  disgusted  with  the  dis- 

•>  RomtuaUi  Vita,  scr.  Daminni.  {3fabill.  Acta  SS.  S.  VI.  P.  I.  p.  247.)  Kule  In  HMten.  Th. 
ILf*.  19S.  Archang.  IlatftirnU  RomnaMlna  8.  Cainaldulensis  O.  Hist  Par.  \(!ii\.Vl.—Owilhf!rU 
TitA(JiiihUl.  Acta  SS.  a  VI.  P.  IL  p.  278.)  BuUarlum  VallumhroMnum,  s.  bullae  Pontiflcum,  qui 
«ci)(l«m  Ord.  privllegils  dccorarunt,  a  Fulg^ntio  XanJio.  Flot.  1729. 

h)  Vita  K  SUphani  by  Gerhard^  the  7th  prior  of  Grammont.  (Af<irt«n^^  ampHsa  Col.  Th.  VI.  p. 
Wflft.    JfahiUon^  Ann.  Ord.  8.  B«n.  Th.  V.  p.  65.)    Hist  prolixlor  Prior,  Grandimont  (Ifartfne.  lb. 

ILIS.) 


228  MEDIAEVAL  CHUltCII  HISTORY.    PER.  IIL    A.  D.  800-1218. 

graceful  life  of  liis  archbishop,  renounced  the  world.  There  is  ft  melancholy 
tale  which  assigns  another  cause  for  tliis  act,  but  it  waa  not  known  until  the 
close  of  the  thirteenth  century,  (c)  He  erected  huts  for  himself  and  a  few 
companions  (1048)  in  the  wild  mountain  gorge  of  Chartreuse  near  Grenoble. 
He  was  induced  by  his  former  pnpil,  Urban  IL,  to  visit  Rome  (1090),  but  he 
soon  became  weary  of  a  secular  life  in  that  city,  and  after  refusing  the  bish- 
opric of  Reggio,  he  founded  a  new  Carthusian  monastery  in  Calabria,  in 
which  ho  ended  his  days  (1101).  The  order  was  not  organized  into  a  society 
until  1141  in  the  mother  convent.  For  a  long  time  the  Carthusians  perse- 
vered in  the  practice  of  an  abstinence  so  strict  that  they  rejected  all  gifts 
except  necessary  food  and  skins  for  parchments.  The  wealth  they  received 
at  a  later  period  was  expended  in  the  embellishment  of  churches,  (d) 
4.  When  France  was  visited  by  a  disorder  called  St.  Anthony's  fire,  the  order 
of  the  Hospitallers  of  St.  Anthony  was  founded  for  the  relief  of  the  sick  by 
Gaston^  a  wealthy  nobleman  of  Dauphin^,  from  gratitude  for  the  recovery 
of  his  son  (1095).  At  first  it  consisted  entirely  of  lay  brethren,  but  aft:er- 
wards  it  was  composed  of  canons  under  the  Rule  of  Augustine,  (e)  5.  Robert 
of  Arhrmcl^  at  an  early  period  a  divine,  then  a  superintendent  of  a  diocese,  and 
subsequently  a  preacher  of  repentance  and  of  the  crusades,  was  the  founder 
of  the  Benedictine  Congregation  of  Fontctrand^  for  penitents,  especially  of 
the  female  sex  who  had  once  fallen  from  virtue.  For  this  class  of  persons 
he  seems  to  have  felt  a  peculiar  interest,  and  therefore  fell  under  the  re- 
proaches of  his  contemporaries.  In  compliment  to  the  Queen  of  Heaven  the 
supreme  direction  of  the  society  was  intrusted  to  female  hands,  {f) 

§  207.     The  Chtercians  and  St.  Bernard. 

1)  Relatio  qnaHter  Inccplt  Or«lo  CIstcrdonsK  (Auherti  3firaei  Chron.  CtoL  OkL  Colon.  1641.  pt 
888.)  Ifeiniqii^,  Regula,  Constitt.  et  Privil.  Ord.  Cist  Ant  KWO.  f.—JfanrU/us,  Ann.  Cist  Lngd. 
1642.  4  Th.  f.  rUrre  U  Xaitt,  Hl.*t  de  TOrdrc  de  ClteAUX.  Par.  16965S.  9  Th.  2)  Btrmirdi  Opp. 
(Letters,  Discours^es,  Poem.s  ascetic  writings.)  cd.  MuhUlon^  Par.  1667.  1690.  6  Th.  f.  1719,  2  Th.  £ 
Ven.  1726.  2  Tli.  £  Par.  1S89.  2  Th.  Mwl.  1851.«^.  8  vols.  4.  His  llfb  by  contemponui^B :  GnlUimuB, 
Abbot  of  8.  Thierry,  GaufredtM  and  AUinus  de  Insulia,  Monks  of  Clairvaux.  {MabiUon  Th.  L  ud 
VI.)— AVa;M/«r,  d.  h.  Bernh.  u.  &  Zeitalt  Bcrl.  <1818.)  1848.  [Tr.  into  Engl,  by  Wrench^  Lond.  ISlfii 
12mo.]    .;:  ElUndorf,  Bemb.  u.  d.  Ilier.  18S9.  2  vob».    liathbonne,  Hist  d.  8.  Bern.  Par.  1S43.  2  Th. 

Robert.,  who  had  been  dedicated  to  the  Virgin  by  his  mother  before  his 
birth,  became  dissatisfied  while  yet  an  abbot  with  the  comfortable  life  of  the 
wealthy  monks,  and  founded  a  convent  at  Citeaux^  under  regulations  requir- 
ing the  most  extreme  poverty  (1098).  In  the  order  which  sprung  from  this^ 
the  most  rigid  abstemiousness  was  demanded,  all  splendor  in  churches  was 
condemned,  and  its  members  promised  absolutely  to  submit  to  the  bishop  of 
the  diocese,  as  well  as  to  abstain  from  all  the  ordinary  employments  of  life, 
not  excepting  even  the  charge  of  souls.  The  internal  a^rs  of  the  society 
were  directed  only  by  the  law  of  love ;  (a)  the  position  of  the  Abbot  of 


c)  Launoil  do  vera  causa  secessus  8.  Brunonis  in  eremnm.  Par.  1646.  (0pp.  Th,  II.  P,  n.  pt  8S1) 

d)  MahUl.  Ann.  Tli.  V.  p.  202s8.  and  Acta  SS.  S.  VI.  P.  II.  Prae£  p.  87flHL  Legends  respecting  the 
life  of  Bruno  may  be  seen  in  Acta  SS.  Oct  Th.  III.  p.  49188. 

e)  AcU  SS.  Jan.  Th.  II.  p  160.— A'f//)/),  de  fhitrib.  S.  Ant  Lpa.  1787.  4 
/)  MahiUon,  Ann.  Th.  V.  p.  814s9l  AcU  SS.  Febr.  Th.  III.  p.  098aB. 
a)  Charta  Charltatis.  i^Manrique  Th.  L  p.  109sa.) 


CHAP.  UL    ECGLES.  LIFK    S  807.  CISTERCIANS.    BEBNAKD.  229 

Clteaax  and  the  govoramont  by  annual  General  Cbaptcrs,  were  all  modelled 
after  the  Constitution  of  Clugny,  although  the  abbots  of  the  four  oldest 
affiliated  convents  gradually  attained  equality  with  the  Abbot  of  Citeaux 
(1119).  The  black  dress  of  the  Benedictines  was  exchanged  for  a  white 
oowL  By  the  extreme  veneration  which  the  Cistercians  acijuircd  among 
their  contemporaries,  who  regarded  them  as  perfect  representatives  of  apos- 
tolic simplicity,  and  by  the  splendor  of  St.  Bernard's  name,  this  now  order 
was  able  to  vie  successfully  with  the  congregation  of  Clugny.  The  latter 
was  indeed  considerably  shaken  by  the  excesses  of  its  abbot,  Pontius 
(1109-25),  who  carried  the  staft*  of  the  shepherd  and  of  the  pilgrim  in  the 
same  hand  which  bore  the  sword  of  the  highway  robber.  It  was,  however, 
enabled  to  close  this  controversv  honorably  to  itself  under  the  direction  of 
Peter  the  Venerable  (1122-56).  (h)  Bernard  was  born  at  Fontaine,  of  a  fami- 
ly distingnished  for  monastic  piety.  Even  during  the  struggles  of  his  early 
youth  he  showed  that  he  was  by  natural  temperament  inclined  to  a  monastic 
life.  Accordingly  in  the  year  1113  he  became  a  monk  at  Citeaux,  and  in 
1115  the  Abbot  of  Clairvaux,  a  convent  founded  by  persons  belonging  to 
that  community.  By  his  entire  disengagement  from  the  world,  ho  seemed 
utterly  independent  of  the  rules,  and  was  actually  su[)erior  to  all  those 
laws  by  which  men  are  usually  governed.  He  was  certainly  highly  endowed 
by  nature,  and  in  popular  estimation  as  well  as  in  his  own  opinion  he  pos- 
seased  the  power  of  working  miracles.  Educated  beneath  the  foliage  of  a 
mighty  forest,  his  thoughts  were  continually  directed  toward  heaven.  In 
spite  of  the  general  insipidity  of  the  age,  he  was  distinguished  by  an  clo- 
qnence  which  was  irresistible  even  by  those  who  could  not  fully  comproliend 
bis  discoarfle.  He  was  rather  jealous  of  human  learning,  and  so  zealous  in 
bebalf  of  the  Church  that  he  engaged  in  a  sanguinary  persecution.  IJe  was 
^thnsiastic  in  his  eflfbrts  to  promote  the  power  of  the  [wiesthood,  and  yet 
candid  and  severe  with  respect  to  their  irregularities.  In  almost  every  part 
of  Europe  ho  beheld  those  whose  minds  he  had  formed  by  his  in>tructions 
seated  upon  episcopal  thrones,  he  himself  acted  as  an  umpire  in  nearly  all 
^  the  quarrels  which  took  place  between  ditterent  princes  and  nations,  and  by 
tbe  diffusion  of  his  highly  theocratic  spirit  among  the  priesthood,  he  became 
the  most  influential  man  of  his  age.  By  his  influence  his  order  became  so 
powerfdl,  that  soon  after  his  death  (1153)  it  endeavored  to  excel  its  rivals  of 
GogDj,  not  so  much  in  humility  and  contempt  of  the  world  as  in  indepen- 
dence and  wealth. 

§  208.     PraeinoTtstranU  and  Cannelitcs. 

Etrmanni  JfanacM  de  niirac  ».  Mariac  laudc*.  III,  2s8.  {Guiherti^  0pp.  ed.  (PAch^ry,  p.  544.) 
Aete  P9.  Jane.  Th.  T.  p.  8a4s(«,  Ckry9.  ran  der  Sterre,  Vita  8.  Norb.  Antu.  1C5(J.  Hugo,  Vie  de  %. 
IflrtL  Lozeoib.  17W.  4.  BIbL  Ord.  Pra^monst,  per  Jo.  le  Puigf^  Pnr.  1633.  f. 

Jonn.  PhocaA,  compendlsrla  descriptlo,  etc  {Uon.  AWttii  Symniicta.  Ven.  17*^.  f.  p.  17.)  Ja- 
tMde  tUHaco  IliRt.  llloro<».  c.  62.  {lUmgarH  Th.  I.  p.  1075.)  Kule  In  HolHUn.  Th.  HI.  p.  ISsat 
AmM  a  Virg.  MariOy  Specalnm  Cartnclitanum.  Antu.  lC6<i.  4  Tb.  fl 

Xorhcrt  was  originally  a  canon  at  Cologne,  and  as  the  chaplain  to  Henry 


*■>  Bernard!,  Apol.  ad  Gull.  {MnhilUm  Tli.  IV.  p.  33.)  Pi  tH  I>r».  ad  Bern.  I.  Kp.  3«i.  IV.  Ep. 
17.  VL  Ep.  4  (BIbL  PP.  Max.  Th.  XXII.)  Dialogtu  Inter  tlunlac.  num.  ct  Cist  do  dlver>!!»  utrins^iue 
OwL  obicrTT.  ilfarteru,  Tb«t.  Tb.  V.  p.  1569.) 


230  MEDIAEVAL  CHUBCH  UISTOET.  PKB.  lU.    A.  D.  800-1811 

V.  lived  m  the  enjoyment  of  wealth,  with  the  brightest  prospects  of  promo- 
tion in  the  priestliood.  By  an  event  which  was  supposed  to  bear  a  strong 
resemblance  to  the  conversion  of  Paul,  he  was  induced  to  throw  all  these  aside, 
and  enter  upon  the  humble  employment  of  a  preacher  of  repentance.  After 
some  ineffectual  attempts  to  reform  other  canons,  he  founded  an  order  of  mo- 
nastic canons  in  the  unhealthy  vale  of  Primontre  (1120).  When  he  appeared 
preaching  repentance  at  the  Diet  of  Speyer,  he  was  elected  as  if  by  a  divine 
inspiration  to  the  vacant  archbishopric  of  Magdeburg,  and  entered  that  city 
in'  the  garb  of  a  beggar.  A  powerful  storm  of  opposition  was  raised  against 
him  on  account  of  his  strenuous  efforts  to  induce  his  wealthy  retinue  there 
to  practise  the  same  abstemiousness  which  he  showed.  The  people,  how- 
ever, before  whose  fury  he  was  once  obliged  to  save  his  life  by  flight,  main- 
tained possession  of  his  body  as  though  it  were  the  sacred  palladium  of  their 
city,  in  opposition  to  the  demands  of  the  monks  of  Primontre.  Before  his 
death  (1134)  Norbert  witnessed  the  rapid  increase  of  his  order  in  the  estab- 
lishment of  numerous  chapters  and  convents  for  monks  and  nuns. — Berthold, 
a  crusader  from  Calabria,  who  with  a  few  companions  had  resided  for  a  time 
in  a  cave  of  Mount  Carmel,  was  the  founder  of  the  order  of  the  Carmelitesi, 
though  his  claims  to  that  honor  have  been  denied  by  his  followers.  On  ac- 
count of  the  hallowed  recollections  connected  with  the  mountain  where  they 
resided,  and  the  similarity  of  the  habits  of  their  order  with  those  of  Eliaf, 
they  have  always  maintained  that  it  was  founded  by  that  ancient  prophet, 
and  continued  until  modern  times  by  a  series  of  successive  prophets,  (ff) 
When,  by  the  conquests  of  the  Saracens,  the  Carmelites  lost  possession  of 
their  original  seat,  they  allege  that  the  holy  Virgin  gave  her  scapular  to 
Simon  Stocl',  the  general  of  the  order,  that  it  might  become  thenceforth  the 
habit  of  all  its  members,  with  the  assurance  that  whoever  should  die  in  this 
dress  would  never  suffer  in  everlasting  fire,  (h)  Kew  possessions  were  ac- 
quired by  these  Brethren  of  our  Lady  of  Mount  Carmel  in  every  coantry  of 
Europe. 

§  209.     The  Trinitarians. 

Bonai>mtura  Baro,  Annalcs  Ord.  S.  Trin.  Eom.  16S4.    Bale  in  IloUtm.  Th.  IIL  ik  8taL 

The  vague  and  visionary  efforts  of  two  hermits,  John  de  Matha^  pre- 
viously a  Parisian  divine,  and  Felix  de  Valois,  appear  to  have  been  finally 
directed  to  a  definite  object  by  Innocent  III.,  and  an  Order  of  the  Holy 
Trinity  was  established  for  the  redemption  of  Christian  slaves  (1198).  The 
first-fruits  of  its  efforts  were  exhibited  in  the  year  1200,  when  a  multitude 
of  Christians  purchased  from  slavery  in  Morocco  returned  to  their  homes. 
The  order  of  the  Trinitarians  (de  redemptione  captivorum,  Mathurins,  freres 
aux  fines)  spread  itself  rapidly  in  all  parts  of  Southern  Europe.  Femak 
convents  were  also  instituted,  and  through  many  vicissitudes  the  primary 
object  of  the  order  has  not  been  altogether  abandoned  even  to  a  very  recent 

a)  Papebroch  (ActE  SS.  April  Th.  L  p.  774a.  and  in  some  controvereial  writings)  has  jrfren  tbe 
tnie  history  in  oppo6ition  to  the  prolix  volumes  of  the  CarmeIItc&  [Afoaheim  Hist  Cent  XIL  Put 
II.  f  21.  McLain*8  transL] 

b)  Launoii  Dse.  do  Sim.  StochU  Tiso.  Par.  1658.  (0pp.  Tb.  IL  P.  11.) 


CHAP.  UL    ECGLES.  LIFE,    f  SIO- HUMILIATES,    f  311.  BEUG.  KNIGHTS.      231 

period.  The  residence  of  its  General  (minister  genoralis),  and  the  place 
where  its  general  chapter,  composed  of  all  the  superiors  of  its  convents,  con- 
vened, was  at  Cerfroy,  where  the  two  original  hermits  were  once  visited  hy 
a  white  deer  with  the  mark  of  a  cross  hetween  its  horns. 

§  210.     The  humiliates. 
TXrahotehi,  Teten  Hamillatorum  monaroenta.  Mediol.  1766fl8.  8  Th.  4>. 

Many  felt  that  the  religions  should  he  hrought  into  more  intimate  connec- 
tions with  the  secular  life  than  the  general  Church  at  that  time  was  able  to 
afford.     The  community  of  the  HumiliaUn  was  therefore  instituted  in  the 
eleventh  century,  composed,  at  first,  of  an  association  of  pious  Milanese  who 
ha<l  been  exiled  from  their  native  city.     Gradually  it  became  extended  over 
all  parts  of  Lombardy,  and  embraced  principally  mechanics,  especially  weav- 
ers of  woollen  fabrics,  connected  together  by  the  bond  of  a  common  employ- 
ment, and  a  love  of  pious  exercises.    All  their  property  was  held  in  common. 
At  a  later  period  even  monks  and  priests  united  with  them,  and  took  part  in 
the  labors,  the  business,  and  the  trade  of  the  Society.    Their  community  was 
t4)lerated  by  the  hierarchy  on  the  ground  of  its  being  a  point  of  connection 
between  the  convent  and  the  world.    Innocent  III.  endeavored  to  give  it  a 
definite  poation  by  imposing  upon  it  the  rule  of  Benedict,  and  it  was  sup- 
plied with  a  grand  master  in  1246.    Finally  it  became  secularized,  and  was 
abolished  by  Pius  V.  (1571). 

§  211.     Ritahlishment  of  the  Orders  of  Knighthood. 

I  TTi'.  Tyr.  L  10.  XVIII,  4m.  Jac.  de  Yitriaco  c  W.  PM.  Veltroniutt,  StatuU  Ord.  hosp.  8. 
Ja  Rom.  IKS.  t  HoUt^.  Th.  II.  p.  4i4as.— II.  ( Yertot)  Hist,  des  Chevallere  hospltallere  de  S.  Jean. 
Fw.lWl  4Th.  4. 1761.  7  Th.  {yiethammer)  Gcech.  d.  Malthescrord.  nach  Vcrtot  Jen.  1792.  2  vote. 
iWi,  dHI'mlxIne  o<l  In.oUtuto  del  ord.  dl  S.  Giovanni.  Kom.  17S1.  4.  Fiilk^nHt^ln,  Gesch.  d.  Joh. 
Onl  Dre«d.  lS8a  2  vols. 

I  Wil  Tyr.  XII,  7.  Jac.  de  YUr.  c  65.  Bernard  I  Tract  de  nova  militia  ».  adhortatlo  ad  inllites 
tempH  (0pp.  Th.  IV.  p.  9S.)  JToUten.  Th.  II.  p.  429sa.  MUntsr,  Statntenbuch.  Brl.  1794.  1  vol.— 
II  P.du  Putf,  n\st  d«  Templlers.  Par.  IMO.  Brux.  1751.  4  Uebers.  Frankf.  1C65.  4.  irEtftivol, 
Hilt  CTit  ct  apol.  den  Chev.  da  Temple.  Par.  1789.  2  Th.  4.  An  Epitome :  Die  Rltter  des  Temp,  zii 
Jeim  Lpz.  1790.  2  vols.  Wilcke^  Gesch.  d.  Temp.  Onl  Lpz.  18268.  2  vols.  FnlkermUin,  Gesch.  d. 
Tempi  Onl.  DresL  1883.  2  vols.  [C.  6.  AddUon,  Hist,  of  tlie  Knights  Teraplars,  Ac  I»nd.  1843.  9 
•4i$ed.l8.%4.8.] 

L  Sutaten  des  dent  Ord.  edited  by  E.  ITfnntg,  K«)ni^'*b.  1806.  PMH  d«  Dinthurg  (about  1826), 
Chronic.  Priwlae  !<.  Hist  Ord.  Tent  ed.  HartknocK  Jen.  1679.  4.  Codex  diplomaticns  Ord.  Tent 
UHtBiKlenbach  z.  Gesch.  d.  dent  O.  ed.  by  J.  G.  Ilenne.  Montz.  1845.— II.  Duslfii,  lll.st  Onl.  Eqult 
Tent  Tlnd.  1727.  t  Joh.  Yoifft^  Gesch.  Prcnss.  b.  z.  Untergangc  d.  Ilerrsch.  d.  deutsch.  Ordens. 
Kooipb.  182788.  4  vols. 

The  various  orders  of  knighthood  which  sprung  up  during  the  tenth  cen- 
^,  were  the  legitimate  result  of  the  feudal  system  and  the  military  occupa- 
tions of  the  youth.  When  regarded  as  an  affair  of  past  times,  this  system  is 
•foiled  as  the  ideal  toward  which  noble  minds  were  induced  to  aspire,  but 
^  ^ts  bitter  reality  it  was  the  ascendency  of  a  great  corporation,  whose 
power  was  restrained  by  Christian  customs,  and  embellished  by  the  Princi- 
pe of  love  and  honor.  Duels  and  tournaments  were  always  zealously 
^posed  by  popes  and  synods,  but  the  system  of  knighthood  itself  was  sanc- 
^^^'^  by  the  Chnrch  because  it  enlisted  men  in  the  service  of  God,  and  for 


232  MEDIAEVAL  CUITRCH  HISTOBT.    FEB.  IIL    A.  D.  800-1918. 

the  defence  of  all  who  were  oppressed.  Tlie  two  most  powerful  tendenoiee 
of  the  age  were  united  daring  the  holy  wars  in  forming  a  spiritual  knight- 
hood which  comhined  the  three  monastic  vows  with  the  solemn  promise 
never  to  desist  from  a  conflict  with  unbelievers.  1.  Some  citizens  of  Amalfi, 
while  trading  with  Palestine,  had  (1048)  founded  a  hospital  for  the  reception 
of  pilgrims  to  Jerusalem.  The  fraternity  which  had  the  management  of  this 
hospital,  after  the  conquest  of  Jerusalem  by  the  Christians,  took  the  monas- 
tic vow  under  the  name  of  the  Brethren  of  the  Hospital^  dedicated  to  St, 
John  the  Baptist^  in  Jcrusiilem.  Raymond  du  Puy^  the  second  principal  of 
the  order,  to  their  former  duty  of  hospitality  and  attendance  upon  the  sick, 
added  that  of  knighthood  in  opposition  to  infidels  (about  1118),  and  this  soon 
became  the  principal  object  of  the  order.  2.  Nine  knights;  with  Huffo  d4i 
Payens  as  their  master  (inagister  militiae),  took  from  the  hand  of  the  Patri- 
arch of  Jerusalem  the  knightly  monastic  vow  (1118),  and  from  their  location 
in  the  royal  palace,  by  the  side  of  the  former  Temple  of  Jerusalem,  they 
assumed  the  name  of  '^mjylars  (pauperes  commilitoncs  Ohristi  templique 
Salomonis).  8.  During  the  siege  of  Aine  (1190),  some  citizens  of  Bremen 
and  Lubeck  founded  a  hospital  which  was  favored  by  the  Grerman  princesi 
and  under  Ileun/  of  Walpot  became  the  Order  of  tlie  German  Knights  of  the 
Virgin  Mary.  Each  of  these  orders  embraced  three  estates,  viz..  Knights, 
Priests,  and  Serving  Brethren.  In  this  latter  class  were  included  not  only 
all  who  were  engaged  in  manual  labor,  but  squires.  The  whole  was  arranged 
in  accordance  with  an  aristocratic  constitution,  under  the  government  of  a 
Grand  Master,  Commanders,  and  Chapters  of  Knights.  They  formed  the 
standing  army  of  the  Church  in  the  East,  but  as  a  general  society  of  noble- 
men they  acquired  vast  possessions  in  every  part  of  Europe.  The  Templars 
especially  soon  became  independent  by  their  own  power,  and  the  privileges 
granted  to  them  by  the  pope.  So  highly  was  their  spirit  of  devotion  to  the 
order  cultivated,  that  they  became  a  military  society  of  noblemen,  combining 
their  hereditary  powers  with  the  privileges  of  the  clergy.  It  was  not  long, 
therefore,  before  they  found  themselves  in  a  hostile  position  to  both  bishops 
and  kings.  Wherever  the  Church  in  any  way  stood  in  need  of  worldly 
weapons,  especially  in  Spain  while  contending  with  the  Moors,  and  in  Germa- 
ny in  connection  with  the  Cistercians,  similar  orders  of  knights  were  estab- 
lished of  a  purely  national  character. 


CHAP.  IV.— STATE  OF  SCIENCE  IN  THE  CHURCH. 

§  212.     Scientific:  Education  of  the  Nirith  Century, 

Launoli  Do.  de  scholia  celebr.  a  Car.  M.  et  post  enndem  instanratis.  Par.  1672.  HamK  1717.  Hist 
lltt6ralre  de  la  France  imw  des  rel.  Benedlctlns.  Par.  VBHax  Th.  IV.  V.  Cramsr,  Boasnet,  Th.  V.  toL 
IL  Ilt'/el^,  wi^  zust  hn  add  west  Deutschl.  9.  10.  and  11.  Jaliriih.  (TQb.  QoarUlachr.  1S8S.  P.  2.) 
Bdhr,  Oeacli.  d.  rum.  Lit  im  Carol.  S^eita.  Carlsr.  1S40. 

The  diffusion  of  education  commenced  by  Charles  the  Great  was  con- 
tinued under  the  Carolingians  by  the  schools  established  in  the  cathedrals 
and  convents.    The  most  ethcient  agent  in  it,  so  far  as  related  to  Germany, 


CHAP.  lY.    £C€LES.  SCIENCE.    $  ^^S.  B.  MAUBUS.    CLAUDIUS.    EBIOENA.     233 


Babanut  Ifaurus^  the  pnpil  of  Alcoin,  and  the  friend  of  the  Emperor 
Louis  when  that  monarch  was  in  distress.    lie  had  travelled  in  Pnloi^tine,  and 
in  822  was  called  to  preside  over  the  convent  of  Fulda.    Compelled  to  fly 
from  that  place  in  842,  he  soon  after  (847)  became  Archbishop  of  Mcntz,  and 
died  in  856.     With  great  humility  he  devoted  himself  to  the  lowly  task  of 
collecting  the  various  explanations  of  the  Scriptures  found  in  the  writings 
of  the  fathers,  and  gave  a  minute  description  of  the  universe,  {(i)    Tlie  labors 
of  scientific  men  were  principally  directed  to  the  consideration  of  the  exter- 
nal ionnB  of  the  Church.    In  this  kind  of  literature,  as  well  as  in  his  course 
of  life,  Agohard,  Archbishop  of  Lyons  (died  841 ),  may  be  reg:arded  as  the 
representative  of  the  moderate  opposition  raised  in  the  French   Church 
against  praying  to  images,  and  all  kinds  of  superstition,  (h)      Claudius^ 
Bishop  of  Turin  (d.  about  840),  a  great  admirer  of  Augustine,  presents  us 
with  a  specimen  of  the  stormy  battle  then  waged  against  the  worship  of 
images,  popes,  and  saints,  (r)    ffinemar,  Archbishop  of  Rhoims  (died  882), 
shows  the  position  of  an  ecclesiastical  statesman  standing  between  kings, 
popes,  and  bishops,  sometimes  in  the  character  of  a  friend,  and  sometimes  in 
that  of  an  opponent,  frequently  with  great  earnestness,  but  always  with  dex- 
terity and  dignity  in  times  of  extreme  peril,  defending  the  rights  of  the 
utioDal  Church  and  of  his  archbishopric,  (d)    Haytno^  Bishop  of  Ilalbcr- 
Btadt  (died  853),  brought  to  the  recollection  of  his  contemporaries  the  views 
of  the  primitive  Church  by  means  of  a  much-used  epitome  of  the  Latin 
translation  of  Eusebius.  {e)    Jonas^  thb  successor  of  Theodulf  in  the  bishopric 
of  Orleans,  in  opposition  to  Claudius  defended  the  customs  of  the  Church  of 
thit  period,  so  far,  at  least,  as  they  proceeded  from  a  pious  disposition.    The 
adrioe  he  gave  to  laymen  was  superior  to  the  prejudices  of  the  Church,  and 
frequently  attained  the  enlarged  philanthropy  required  by  tlie  gosple.  (/) 
/(An  SeotuM  (or)  Erigena  (d.  about  880),  who  resided  at  the  court  of  Charles 
the  Bald,  though  he  was  originally  educated  in  the  British  school,  under  the 
iifltieDoe  of  the  writings  of  Origen  and  the  Areopagite,  stood  so  isolated 
from  his  contemporaries,  and  so  far  superior  to  his  times,  that  his  doctrines 
were  not  suflBciently  understood  to  be  condemned  by  the  Church  until  the 
thirteenth  century,  (g)    To  his  profound  conceptions  of  the  divine  immen- 
■ 

«)Oppt  t*\.  Colr^neriM,  Col.  1627.  6Th.  f.  3fionf.  (Patrolofr.  Par.  1W2.  voK  CVII.-XII.>— 
^-  ff.  C.  Sckte^in,  dc  Rhab.  M.  primo  Gorm.  praecepUire.  Ileidelb.  1811.  4.  Tfib.  QaartalsKjhr.  ISSS. 
^'9^  F.  KhriMtmann^  Hnban.  Mcntz.  1S41. 

ft)  0pp.  od.  Snlut.  Par.  1666.  2  Th,  {Oalland.  Th.  XIII.  p.  405.)  Ilund^tihagen,  do  Agob.  vlt» 
<tKripH\6iea8.1»)2.  P.  L 

e)  Frafm-ntoln  Flaeii  Catal.  tout,  vorlt  p.  936.  Bibl.  PP.  Max.  Th.  XIV.  p.  197.  3fnhiUon, 
Titt.  AotL  p.  »0.  RwIelbacK,  Claad-  Inedlt  opp.  spcclnilna.  Ilofn.  1S24.  C,  Sihmh/,  Claud.  (Zrlt.soljr. 
tWrt.Th.184S.  H.  2.) 

<0  Opp.  ed.  Sirmond,  Par.  1645.  2  Th.  f  Flodoard,  Hist  ecc.  Rem.  Ill,  15-29.  Hist  lit  de  la 
'*■»««.  Th.  V.  p.  544«.    (?**«,  Merkwanllgk.  a.  Lebcn  a  Schrr.  HIncm.  Oott.  18<>6. 

')  De  dirist  remm  meinorla  a.  Ilist  ecc  breviariutn,  od.  Boxhorn^  Lagd.  1650.  Mader, 
Hrinat  1671. 

/)  De  culta  Imajrfnum  1.  TIL  a.  840.  (BIbL  PP.  Lngd.  Th.  XIV.  p.  167.  De  Institat  lalcall  I  III. 
^^-(ITAch^ry,  Spldl.  ed.  2.  Th.  I.  p.  25«.)  De  Institut  repia.  (76.  pi  824.) 

»»  D«  dirblone  natnrae  L  V.  od.  GaU,  Oxon.  16S1.  t  ScMut^r,  Monant.  19a3.— P.  //Jort.  J.  Scot 
* '^^  Urppr.  c  chr.  Phil  Kopenh.  1828.  FronmulUr,  Lehre  de.^  J.  8c  r.  Boson.  (Tub.  Zt'ltH'hr. 
^  P.  1.  &)  StaitdenmaUr^  J.  Sc  u.  d.  Wiaaenach.  sr.  2^1t  Frkf.  ISai  vol.  I.   Ilock^  J.  Sc  (Bonn. 


234  MEDIAEVAL  CHURCH  HISTORY.    FER.  IIL    A.  D.  80&-18ieL 

sity,  tho  world  was  one  vast  Theophany  in  different  forms  of  development, 
the  Incarnation  was  simply  the  reconciliation  of  the  finite  with  the  infinite, 
tlie  sacred  Scriptures  were  the  necessary  terms  in  which  the  truth  must  be 
expressed,  in  adaptation  to  human  infirmity,  and  religion  and  philosophy 
were  tlic  twofold  form  in  which  the  same  essential  spirit  was  manifested.  A 
German  poetic  composition,  (h)  in  which  the  evangelical  history  was  repre- 
sented with  all  the  peculiarities  of  the  Germanic  popular  life,  was  a  dawn 
without  a  day,  since  all  literature  continued  to  be  written  in  Latin,  and  sci- 
ence, even  when  laymen  took  part  in  it,  was  wholly  of  an  ecclesiastical  char^ 
acter  (clergie).  During  the  stormy  period  which  followed  the  subversion  of 
the  house  of  Charles  the  Great,  the  more  eminent  lights  of  literary  culture 
were  either  wholly  extinguished,  or  were  concealed  behind  the  walls  of  con- 
vents, where  their  beams  were  only  occasionally  visible.  That  portion  of 
Anglo-Saxon  Christian  literature  which  Alfred  the  Great  (871-901)  saved  by 
his  sword,  and  animated  with  the  antique  traditions  of  ecclesiastical  learning, 
was  apparently  lost  at  his  death.  (/) 

§  218.    First  Eucharist ie  Controversy, 

While  attempting  to  present  the  mysterious  import  of  the  Liturgy,  Pat- 
cliamis  Ixadhert  advanced  the  doctrine  that  the  substance  of  the  consecrated 
bread  and  wine  in  the  Eucharist  was  changed  into  the  very  body  of  Christ 
which  was  bom  of  the  virgin.  This  was  declared  to  be  an  act  of  creation 
by  almighty  power,  though  invisible  to  any  but  an  eye  of  faith,  (a)  This 
sentiment  was  opposed  by  the  learned  writers  of  that  age,  especially  by 
Rabanus  Manrus^  by  Ratramnus^  a  monk  of  Corbie,  who  maintained  the 
indefinite  view  prevalent  in  the  primitive  Church,  according  to  which  there 
was  simply  a  communion  of  the  earthly  with  the  heavenly,  and  by  Erigena, 
to  whom  the  sacrament  of  the  Lord^s  Supper  could  present  nothing  but  a 
sign  of  an  omnipresent  God.  {b)  The  doctrine  of  Paschasius  must  have  been 
well  adapted  to  the  popular  nnderstanding,  from  which,  indeed,  it  may  have 
taken  its  rise,  since  even  before  this  the  consecrated  bread  had  been  changed 
nnder  the  hands  of  Gregory  the  Great  into  a  bleeding  finger,  (c) 

Zeitacbr.  t  Phil.  u.  Th.  1S35.  H.  16.)  B.  JIf4Ur,  J.  80.  Mainz.  lS4i.  A.  ^or$trick,  PhiL  £i1«eDM 
ex  iprios  princii)iis  dclineata.  Gott  1S44  P.  I. 

h)  Coinp.  {Uiue'n)  Lebcn  Je?u.  p.  88. 

€)  AMerii  IlisL  de  reb.  Alfr.  ed.  B7«<?,  Oxon.  1722.  F,  L.  t>.  Stoa>erg^  Leb.  Alfr.  Munst  181& 
[Rob.  PoiceU,  Llle  of  A.  tho  Great  Lond.  1684. 12.  Reinhold  Paidi^  King  Alfred,  Ac  TraojO.  Lond. 
1S52.  Life  of  A.  by  Spelifuin,  Lond.  1S40.  F.  SU'lneU,  The  Mod.  Mon.  Ac  In  a  Life  of  Alft«d  Um 
Or.,  from  the  Gorman  of  A.  V.  HolUr,  Ac  Lond.  1S49.]     Weis^,  Gei>ch.  AMt.  Schaffh.  1852. 

a)  De  corpora  ot  sang.  Domini  s.  de  sacramentls,  881.  the  later  edition,  844.  dedicated  to  Cbarl«s 
the  Bald,  i»  in  MarUtie,  Col.  ampl.  Tb.  IX.  p.  867.  Ep.  ad  Fradcgardam  in  BibL  PP.  Logd.  Tk. 
XIV.  p.  7W'«. 

b)  Jiahani  Kp.  ad  Ileribald.  {MafHUon^  vett  Analect  ed.  2.  p.  17.)  Ratmmni  do  corp.  et  san^ 
I>om.  L.  ad  Carol.  CoL  582.  ed.  J.  BoiUau,  Par.  (1686.)  1712. 12.  Often  attrlboted  to  ErigeiuL— Zati/! 
0.  d.  verlorcn  gchaltnc  Schrift  des  Joh.  8c  t.  d.  Eacbar.  (Stud.  a.  Krit  1828.  vol.  I.  U.  i.) 

c)  Pauli  DLac.  Vita  Greg.  M.  c  2&    Joan,  Diao,  II,  41.    Patch.  Bad,  c  14. 


CHAR  IV.    ECCLKS.  SCIENCR    f  214.  00TT3CHALK.    $  315.  IIEOSWITIIA.       235 

§  214.     Gottschalk.     Cont.  from  §  212. 

O.  XnuQuin^  vett  auctoruin  qui  s.  IX.  de  praed.  scriiMorunt,  opp.  ct  fhigm.  Par.  1650.  2  Th.  4. 
JfantiTh.  XIV.  XV. — J.  CferiiiA,  Gottesiclialcl  ot  praedt-stlnatlanac  controv,  HLsL  (Dubl.  IQiM.  4.) 
Han.  1602.  AeainM  Gottschalk  :  L,  CfUot,  Hist  Gottoso.  VraiMlestinatiani.  Par.  1655.  f.  [Biblical  Ke- 
pertorjr,  voL  XII.  Xa  II.  p.  2255W.   ttTeander,  HUL  of  Clir.  Evl.  Transl.  by  Torr«y,  vol.  III.  p.  472aa.] 

The  authority  of  Augustine  had  continued  unimpaired  till  tlie  middle 
ogess  though  his  peculiar  doctrines  were  generally  misunderstood,  and  almost 
universally  rejected.  GotUchall-  was  a  monk,  of  a  noble  Saxon  family,  who 
even  in  his  childhood  had  been  devoted  to  a  monastic  life.  At  a  svnod  which 
met  at  Mentz  (829),  he  obtained  a  release  from  his  monastic  vow,  but  by  the 
influence  of  his  abbot,  JiahftitUH^  this  decision  was  subsequently  reversed. 
His  excited  spirit  now  sought  tranquillity  in  the  perusal  of  the  writings  of 
An;ru>iine,  in  a  removal  to  the  convent  of  Orbais,  and  in  a  pilgrimage  to 
Rome.  In  the  most  decided  forms  of  expression  he  announced  his  doctrine 
of  a  double  predestination,  founded  upon  the  absolute  foreknowledge  of  Ood, 
according  to  which  some  were  elected  to  life,  and  others  were  consigned  to 
destruction.  Personal  bitterness  was  combined  with  the  aversion  felt  in  the 
Gallic4m  Church  towards  Augustinism,  and  Gottschalk  was  condemned, 
tbroagh  the  influence  of  Rabanus,  at  the  second  Synod  of  Mentz  (848),  and 
delivered  into  the  hands  of  his  metropolitan,  Ilincmar  of  Rheims.  (a)  The 
cause  of  Gottschalk,  or  rather  of  Augustine,  was  sustained  by  all  the  learning 
of  Riitraniutw^  and  the  hierarchical  authority  of  Remigkis^  Archbishop  of 
Lyons.  On  the  other  hand,  Uincinar  defended  the  Frankish  doctrine  that 
man  was  indeed  free  and  yet  needed  divine  grace,  and  Erigena  contended  for 
the  perfect  unity  of  the  divine  decrees,  (li)  The  controversy  remained  ande- 
cided,  bnt  Gottschalk,  worn  down  by  hierarchical  violence,  and  absorbed  in 
private  reveries  by  w^hich  bis  life  was  beguiled  away,  died  excommunicated 
but  unsubdued  in  prison  (868). 

§  215.     Literary  Interest  during  the  Tenth  Century^  vnJ^r  the  Othoe. 

So  strong  were  the  recollections  of  classic  antiquity  awakened  in  the 
court  of  the  imperial  house  of  Saxony  by  its  connection  with  Constantinople, 
that  it  began  to  indulge  the  dream  of  restoring  the  Roman  empire  to  its 
original  form.  The  decisions  pronounced  by  the  various  emperors  with  re- 
gard to  the  popes,  gave  them  an  opportunity  to  speak  freely  respecting  the 
abuses  then  practised  in  the  Church.  The  Arabians  had  ever  since  the  eighth 
century  monopolized  the  natural  sciences  as  the  appropriate  product  of  their 
own  civilization,  together  with  every  thing  in  Greek  literature  which  related 
to  them.  The  school  they  had  established  at  Cordova  (after  980)  excited  the 
attention  of  the  neighboring  Christian  countries,  (n)  As  an  evidence  of  the 
classic  education  w^hich  existed  in  the  imperial  court,  Hroswitha  (Ilelena  v. 


a)  De  prfl«<l4»<t  contra  Gott«ch.  Epp.  IIL  eU.  Sirmond^  Par.  16(7.  (The  Letters  of  Kabanns  are 
alM  in  Jfituf/utn  Tli.  I.  P.  I.  p.  86a.)  Two  unprintcd  letters  of  Rab.  re5pucting  Gotlsch.  (Tabu 
(InartaliMrlir.  lf>S6.  11.  H.)    Flodoard,  H.  ecc.  Rem.  Ill,  28.    Manni  Th.  XIV.  p.  919. 

h)  Ratmmni  de  prae<l.  I.  IL  {Mauguin  Th.  I.  P.  I.  p.  2T.)  Jiemigii  L.  dr  trib.  epp.  {Ih.  Th. 
IL  P.  I,  p.  61.)  I/inifnur,  do  praed.  Del  et  lib.  arb.  (Ist  sect  lost  Opp.  vol.  I.)  De  tribus  epp.  I* 
(Oppt  ToL  I.  J/ifW^.  Th.  II.  P.  IL  p.  6T.)    Erigena^  de  prae<l.  DeL  {^Manguin  Th.  I.  P.  I.  p.  108.) 

a)  MiddUdorpf,  de  institutia  literarlis  In  llisp.  quae  Arabes  aactores  babavrant  Q<iett  ISIO.  4. 


236  MEDIAEVAL  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  la    A.  D.  800-1218. 

Rossow,  (lied  about  084),  a  nun  of  Ganderslicim,  may  be  mentioned.  She 
recounted  the  exploits  of  Otho  the  Great  in  rhyme  and  in  hexameter  verse, 
and  expressed  the  parent  ])rinciples  of  Christianity  in  the  style  of  Terence,  (b) 
On  the  other  hand,  Xotker  LubeOj  superintendent  of  the  school  in  the  con- 
vent of  8t.  Gall  (died  1022),  availed  himself  of  his  knowledge  of  the  ancient 
languages  to  give  tranahitions  from  them  into  the  High  Gennan.  (r)  J^atherivs, 
Bisliop  of  Verona  and  Liege  (d.  974),  though  sometimes  a  wanderer  and  even 
a  prisoner  in  consequence  of  the  political  commotions  of  Italy  and  his  own 
ardent  tem|)orament,  in  bitter  and  pointed  language  held  up  before  his  cleri- 
cid  bretliren  a  picture  of  their  own  corruptions,  and  the  duties  required  of 
them  by  the  ancient  laws  of  the  Church,  (d)  The  Arabic  influence  was 
represented  by  Gerhert.  {e)  In  subsequent  times  he  has  been  looked  upon  as 
A  nia;j:ician,  and  perhaps  the  spirit  of  his  age  rendered  it  necessary  that  astro- 
nomy sliould  i)artake  in  some  degree  of  the  character  of  astrology.  But  the 
importance  which  the  school  of  Rheims  attained  nnder  his  management,  and 
the  estimation  in  which  he  was  held  both  in  France  and  Germany,  proves 
that  he  was  not  as  isolated  and  unappreciated  in  his  own  day  as  the  Italian 
accounts  imply.  It  is,  however,  certain  that  the  clergy  in  general  were  by 
no  means  in  advance  of  the  age  in  which  they  lived,  and  it  required  no  great 
skill  on  the  part  of  any  one  to  subject  a  bishop  who  should  exhibit  his  know- 
ledge of  Latin  in  the  sacred  desk,  to  the  most  awkward  imputations.  (/") 

§  216.     Acixdemical  Studies  in  the  Eleventh  and  Twelfth  Centuries, 

No  sooner  was  there  sufficient  order  secured  in  the  state  and  in  the 
Church  to  afford  opportunity  for  a  tranquil  elevation  and  communion  of 
spirit  among  men,  than  the  exuberance  of  life  which  had  long  been  concealed 
broke  forth  in  the  cultivation  of  science.  An  appropriate  instrument  for  the 
intellectual  energy  then  awakened  was  found  in  the  recently  discovered  Latin 
translation  of  the  dialectic  writings  of  Aristotle,  (a)  There  were  still  pre- 
served some  remnants  of  a  Roman  empire  and  laws,  and  the  condition  of  the 
Lombiird  cities  rendered  the  development  of  these  a  matter  of  considerable 
importance.  Accordingly,  about  the  close  of  the  eleventh  century,  the  Ro- 
man law  was  reduced  by  Irnerius  to  a  new  scientiflc  form,  and  applied  to 
new  relations  as  a  European  Christian  law.  (h)  For  the  cultivation  of  these 
laws  several  universities  were  established.  That  of  Bologna  was  at  first 
merely  a  school  for  the  study  of  Law,  while  that  of  Paris  was  for  the  study 
of  Dialectics  and  Theology.  In  the  former,  the  highest  powers  of  the  corpo- 
ration (universitas)  were  vested  in  the  pupils,  but  in  the  latter  they  were  in 
the  hands  of  the  Doctors.    They  owe  their  establishment  not  to  the  favor  of 


b)  C»rmlna  Ottonls  I.  Corned lae  sacnw  VL  (0pp.  ed.  Sohur^/tei^ch^  Vlt  1707.  4.) 

<.')  CatHlogu<>  In  R.  r.  Raumer^  p.  SSajs. 

'/)  l>c  Contenitu  canon um.  Apologia  buI  IpMus.  Do  dlsa)rdla  inter  Ipsum  ct  clerloos.  Medita* 
tlones  cortUs  n.  iirncl«>q.  (Opp.  cd.  RtlUriniy  Voron.  M^.)—EngelhardU,  ii.  Rather.  (KOc«chiehtL 
Abhh.  Erl,  1S32.  N.  5.)    Xeitndtr,  Leben  d.  Rather.  (Deuteche  Zeitsch.  t  cbr.  W.  1S51.  N.  86.) 

e)  Coinp.  $  178.  n<itc  g.    Hc'pecting  Gerbert's  works  «««  ffocky  GerberL  p.  16668. 

/)  Vila  Jfrtmcerci  c.  81.  {Uibn.  Scrr.  ror.  Bransv.  p.  555.)  Comp.  Saxo  Oramm.  L  XL  ed. 
Stfphan.  p.  209. 

a)  Jourdnin,  Keolierchos  critiq.  sur  I'sigc  et  Torigino  dcs  traductions  lat  d'Aristote.  Par.  ISlt. 

h)  Savigtiy^  Gosch.  d.  r^iin.  licohto  in  Mit  Alt  8^4  yoln 


CHAP.  lY.    ECCLE3.  SCIENCE.    $  21&  UNIVERSITIES.    $  217.  BEEENGAR.       237 

popes  or  princes,  bat  to  the  necessities  of  the  tiinea,  as  thousands  of  stndents 
were  drawn  together  by  the  reputation  of  some  distinguished  teiicher.  Acts 
of  incorporation  were  not  sought  for  from  the  pope  until  a  later  period,  when 
the  younger  universities  endeavored  by  such  means  to  rival  those  wliich  de- 
pended upon  their  own  reputation.  The  advantages  springing  from  these 
seats  of  science,  which  controlled  the  opinions  of  the  succeeding  generation, 
were  so  apparent  that  the  popes  were  anxious  by  special  favors  to  secure 
their  attachment  to  themselves,  and  render  them  institutions  in  which  Chris- 
tian studies  generally  (studium  generale)  might  be  pursued,  (c)  By  the  influence 
of  these  universities  science  became  generally  dilFuscd,  at  least  among  the 
higher  dosses,  but  in  spite  of  the  freedom  of  its  development,  it  still  con- 
tinued subservient  to  partial  corjiorate  interests,  enveloped  in  barbarous 
Latin,  and  almost  exclusively  of  an  ecclesiastical  character. 

§  217.     The  Second  Euchariatic  Controversy. 

L  Mawti  Th.  XIX.  p.  757ssw  Adelmani  Ep.  de  verit  corp.  et  san?.  Dom.  cd.  C.  A.  Schmidt^ 
BmnsY.  1770.  Lun/ranci  L.  do  euchar.  wcr.  c.  Ber.  (106S-70.)  Bas.  152S.  and  often.  (0pp.  ed. 
ffAckftrj/^  Par.  1W8.  t  p.  280.)  Bereng.  L.  de  s.  coeiia  c.  Lunfr.  before  lo73.  (The  edit  of  the 
Wolfenbuttel  MSS.  maile  known  by  Letming^  and  half  nnished  by  Jlyldudlin  und  UnnHen  in  6  P^. 
G«tL  1^20-29.  4.)  Ed<L  J.  F.  and  F.  Tk,  Vlather,  Ber.  1S;U.  Acta  Cone  lloin.  Mib  Grejr.  VII. 
tBerrng.  con«cripta.  {.Vuntd  Th.  XIX.  p.  761.)  BernaUlut  Const  (an  opponent  of  Bcrenpar)  de 
Ber.  damiutione  multipIlcL  lOSS.  {ifatVi.  liUberer^  Boccolta  Ferrare^e  di  opp.  Bcivntillci.  Ven.  17S9. 
Th.  XXI.) 

IL  Mabiilon  de  niultiplic.  Ber.  damnatione.  (Analect  Th.  II.)  LeMing,  Ber.  Turon.  o.  Ankund. 
twichtigen  Wcrka  drs?.  Brun-^'hw.  1770.4.  (Schriftcn.  vol.  VIII.  p.  .T14h^  «<»'^7»/<///;i,  annnnthitnr 
edltio  Hbrl  Ber.  slinul  oinnino  de  .•erlpti.**  ejus,  Ooott.  1814.  4.  JbifL  Ber.  Ttir.  {Shlinft.  u. 
Tuchim,  Archiv.  1S14.  voL  IL  St  1.)  [II.  Sudendor/^  Ber.  Tar.  o.  e.  Saminl.  ihn  betreff,  Briefo. 
OimbL  1»0.] 

Bcrengar  (after  1031),  the  superintendent  of  the  cathedral  school  of 
Tours,  and  (after  1040)  archdeacon  at  Angers,  maintained,  in  opposition  to 
the  new  doctrine  advance<l  by  Puschasius,  that  there  was  a  change  in  the 
sacramental  elements  only  in  a  figurative  sense,  lie  contended  that  not  the 
earthly  elements  themselves,  but  their  influences  were  changed  by  their  con- 
nection with  Christ  in  heaven,  who  was  to  be  received  not  by  the  mouth 
but  by  the  heart.  These  views  he  expressed  in  a  letter  to  his  learned  friend 
Lanfrane^  at  that  time  Scholasticus  (superintendent  of  a  cathetlral  school) 
in  the  convent  of  Bee,  but  afterwards  (1070)  Archbishop  of  Canterbury. 
The  latter  carried  out  the  doctrine  of  Poschasius,  by  saying  that  the  actual 
body  of  Christ  in  heaven  remained  entirely  unatfected  by  the  change  in  the 
elements  on  earth.  This  letter  of  Berengar  being  denounced  before  the  eccle- 
^tical  authorities,  (a)  his  doctrine  was  condemned  at  synods  held  at  Ixome 
tod  VcrcelU  (1050).  Learned  friends  advocated  his  cause,  but  public  opinion 
Was  against  him.  Uis  doctrine  admitted  of  a  variety  of  interpretations,  and 
left  the  subject  in  the  vague  st^te  in  which  it  had  been  held  in  past  times ; 
while  that  of  his  opjwnents  presented  a  clearly  defined  idea,  and  threw  groat 


t)  BuUui,  HIat  Univ.  Paris.  1665-7.1  6  Tlu  f.     CrevUr,  II.  de  I'lTniv.  de  ParK  Par.  1761.  7  Th. 
11  IhiharU,  IL  de  rUniv.  Par.  1S29.  Th.  L—Savigny,  Oesch.  d.  rOm.  Rechta  iin  MA.  vol  III. 

a)  ManH  Tb.  XIX.  p.  768. 


238  MEDIAEVAL  CUURCII  UISTOUT.    PER.  IIL    A.  D.  80a-121«. 

honor  upon  the  forips  of  worship,  hy  making  the  sacrifice  of  the  mass  a  g]o- 
rions  Theophany.  Ilildehrand  was  at  that  time  legate,  and  not  only  person- 
ally the  friend  of  Berengar,  hut  in  sentiment  tolerant  toward  his  opinions. 
But  at  the  Synod  of  Tours  (1054),  this  prelate  w^as  prudent  enongh  to  save 
his  reputation  for  orthodoxy  by  the  simple  scriptural  confession  that  the 
bread  and  wine  in  the  Lord^s  Supper  were  the  body  and  blood  of  Christ. 
Berengar,  however,  was  w^ithout  sufficient  influence  at  Rome  (1059)  to  de- 
fend his  opinions  against  the  rude  violence  of  his  enemies,  and  finally  he  con- 
sented to  subscribe  a  confession  in  which  a  grossly  carnal  participation  in  the 
flesh  and  blood  of  Christ  was  asserted.  But  no  sooner  were  his  feet  bevond 
the  Alps  than  he  recalled  this  confession,  with  bitter  execrations  against  what 
he  called  Satan's  seat  at  Rome.  The  controversy  was  contmned  with  equal 
literary  skill  on  both  sides,  in  a  learned  correspondence  between  him  and 
Lanfranc,  the  keenest  dialectician  of  the  age.  The  whole  spirit  of  the  times, 
however,  was  arrayed  against  Berengar,  because  he  contended  for  a  spiritual 
and  against  a  sensuous  conception  of  Christianity.  At  a  Synod  held  at  Rome 
(1078),  Gregory  made  one  more  effort  to  secure  indulgence  for  the  conscience 
of  his  friend  by  presenting  a  formula  of  a  general  nature,  but  even  he  was 
obliged  to  give  way  before  the  zealots  who  surrounded  him,  and  (1079)  to 
demand  a  more  decided  declaration.  Although  even  this  was  subsequently 
recanted  by  Berengar,  he  was  protected  by  the  influence  of  Gregory,  and 
lived  in  retirement  on  the  island  of  St.  Come,  where  he  died  (1088) 
amidst  the  blessings  of  the  Church.  His  memory  was  for  a  long  time  hon- 
ored in  Tours,  but  the  doctrine  that  there  was  a  change  in  the  nature  of  the 
sacramental  element**,  although  the  outward  phenomena,  in  order  to  try  the 
faith  of  believers,  remained  the  same,  had  now  obtained  the  victory.  T'ra/i- 
suhi^tantiation  by  the  hand  of  the  priest  was  made  an  article  of  faith  at  the 
great  Council  of  Lateran.  {b) 

§  218.     Scholasticum,     First  Periofl. 

L.  Danaeu*,  Prtileps.  in  Sentt  Lomb.  (0pp.  thcol.  Gen.  1583  f.  p.  1008.)  Tribhfchot>iu»^  de 
doctorib.  schol  (ir.65)  oil.  Iltfuumnn,  Jon.  1719.  Cramer,  BossueL,  vol.  V.-VII.  EberaMn,  natfirL 
Theol,  dcr  Schol.  Lpz.  1S08.  liitUr,  u.  Begr.  u.  Vorlauf.  d.  chr.  Pliil.  (StncL  u.  KrlL  1$88.  11.  2.  p. 
286SS.)  Histories  of  Phllosopliy,  e«i>ecIaUy  by  Degerando,  llegcl,  Bitior,  [O.  U.  Lewe»,  Dagald 
Stowart,  V.  Cousin,  and  C.  S.  Henry,] 

In  the  Berengarian  controversy  Scholasticism  had  commenced  its  develop- 
ment. This  was  a  kind  of  knighthood  in  Theology,  a  natural  result  of  the 
free  power  of  thought  in  connection  with  the  absolute  ascendency  of  the 
doctrines  of  the  Church.  Academical  studies  were  pursued  without  restraint, 
Aristotle's  Logic  was  universally  admired,  and  the  whole  movement  of  the 
ago  was  vigorous,  though  partially  turned  aside  from  what  experience  shows 
to  be  the  sober  reality  of  life.  All  these  circumstances  had  given  occasion 
for  its  existence,  and  its  whole  power  was  now  to  be  exerted  in  proving  that 
the  doctrines  which  had  been  previously  adopted  by  the  Church  were  abso- 
lutely true  in  the  view  of  an  intelligent  mind,  and  in  defending  their  neces- 
sity.   After  a  brief  struggle  it  was  completely  triumphant  over  the  Theology 


b)  Oonc  Later.  IV.  c.  1.  {MuMi  Th.  XXIL  p.  981.)    [Landon^  p.  TMm.] 


CQAP.  lY.    ECCLES.  8CIENCR    $  218.  ANSELM.    P.  LOMBABD.  239 

which  had  no  other  hasis  than  that  of  authority,  and  during  its  first  period  it 
was  wholly  employed  in  giving  suhtlety  to  the  thoughts  of  the  common  mind  hy 
Aristotelian  formulas.    In  the  very  commencement  of  its  course  wo  find  A  uselm 
of  Aosta,  the  pupil  of  Lanfranc^  and  the  successor  of  that  prelate,  not  only  in  the 
monastic  school,  hut  also  (after  1098)  in  the  archiepiscopal  office  (died  1109). 
Though  always  humble,  he  exhibited  extraordinary  powers  of  mind  not  only 
as  a  theologian,  but  as  a  dignitary  of  the  Church.    The  knowledge  ho  sought 
was  that  with  which  faith  supplied  him,  though  he  endeavored  to  complete 
the  ecclesiastical  system  of  truth  on  the  basis  of  Augustine's  Theology,  by 
his  doctrine  of  Satisfaction  for  sin,  and  to  found  a  rational  system  by  his 
proof  of  the  divine  existence.    According  to  him,  a  recognition  of  the  divine 
existence  is  necessarily  involved  in  a  complete  self-consciousness,  and  immor- 
tality and  salvation  were  the  direct  result  of  the  love  of  God.    This  religion, 
which  had  been  wholly  lost  by  sin,  could  be  restored  in  no  other  way  than 
by  the  expiatory  death  of  the  incarnate  God.  («)    At  the  close  of  this  period 
appeared  Peter  Lombard^  an  academical  teacher,  and  (after  1159)  Bishop  of 
Paris  (d.  1164).    In  his  SenUncen^  the  whole  doctrine  of  the  Church  is  de- 
rived from  the  writings  of  the  fathers,  but  it  is  compiled  and  arranged  in 
such  a  way  as  to  constitute  a  scientific  whole.    This  work  became  the  man- 
ual in  universal  use  during  the  century  in  which  it  was  published,  and  gave 
its  character  to  that  which  followed.    This  distinction  was  due  not  so  much 
to  its  acnteness  or  its  profundity,  as  to  the  ecclesiastical  position  of  its  author, 
its  happy  adjustment  of  opposite  views,  and  its  plainness  to  the  popular 
mind,  {h)    In  the  speculative  views  which  constituted  the  basis  of  its  system 
of  truth,  was  apparent  a  principle  which  had  been  much  discussed  in  the  old 
Greek  philosophy  under  the  name  of  Nominalism  and  Realism.    The  former 
regarded  all  general  ideas  (universalia)  as  nothing  but  abstractions  of  the 
human  understanding,  and  derived  from  the  objects  presented  to  its  observa- 
tion (post  rem) ;  while  tlio  latter  viewed  them  as  having  tlieir  origin  entirely 
in  the  mind  itself  (ante  rem),  or  according  to  a  turn  of  expression  at  one 
time  prevalent,  and  introduced  for  the  sake  of  compromise,  as  that  which  is 
esMntial  in  every  thing  actual  (in  re),  {c)    These  opposite  views  had  a  theo- 
logical significance  in  the  controversy  which  sprung  up  between  A  nttelm  and 
BoicdinuSj  a  canon  of  Compeigne.     The  latter  was  a  nominalist,  arid  was 
consequently  accused  of  Tri theism  at  the  Synod  of  Somons  (1092),  where  he 
was  oompclled  to  retract  his  assertions  on  this  subject.  (r7)    Nominalism,  after 
this,  wore  a  suspicious  aspect  in  the  view  of  the  Church  generally. 


fl)  MoDoloffluin,  Proflloginm,  Cur  Dens  homo?  (Erl.  18^.)  Do  conceptn  vlrjrinall  etoriij.  pec- 
«aOpfi.  (fi  O^rberon,  Par.  167R.)  odd.  Bfrnfffictt.  Par.  1721.  2  Th.  f— Acta  S:?.  Apr.  Th.  II.  p. 
«•»  (MdMer)  Anffolmns.  (TQb.  Qnartalsclir.  ls2T.  8.  4.  11.)  Billroth^  do  Ans.  Pr<»sl(>glo.  ct  Monol. 
Ifi1S91    9«ef  184.  notoa. 

^)  Sententiaram  1.  IV.  Yen.  1477.  reo.  J.  AleawnA,  Lovan.  1M6.  f.  and  often. 

e)  /  S-iUih^rii  Phil.  Nomlnalinin  vindicata.  Par.  16.M.  BaumgarUn-Cnmhn*^  de  vero  8choL 
^'■nian  et  Nomlnallum  disor.  decretisqae  ipAorum  theol  (Opnscc.  1886.  p.  55fts.  KenKKlelling  iA  tho 
Nr.  of  1821.) 

<0  JoannU  Jfon.  Ep.  Ana.  {Riltu.  Miscell  1.  IV.  p.  473.)  Ajuelmi  1.  IL  Ep.  85.  41.  and  (1094) 
^  ^  fide  Trln.  et  de  incarn.  Terbi  c.  blasphemlas  RuzclinL 


240  MEDIAEVAL  CnUCCH  IIISTOBY.    PER.  IIL    A.  D.  800-1218. 

§  219.     MyRticism.     First  Period, 

IT.  /khmid,  <!.  Mystic  d.  Mitt  Alt  in  s.  Entstvhungsper.  Jen.  1824.  AUt.  Lisbner,  Hugo  t.  8. 
Victor,  n.  d.  tlieol.  Klohtungcn  er,  Ztit  L[)z.  lf^82.  J.  Gorrgg^  dio  christl.  Mystik.  liefirensb.  lS86ia 
8  vols.  A.  JMffericK,  d.  chr.  Mystik  in  Hirer  Kntw.  u.  Ihrer  Denkm.  voL  L  Entwleklungstgotoli. 
Qotb.  184S.    [L.  Koact^  Gesch.  d.  cbr.  Mystik.  Li>8.  lSft3.] 

The  tendency  of  the  age  in  the  direction  of  the  feelings  and  of  the  ima^- 
nation  was  shown  in  a  mysticism  of  a  lively  and  vigorous  character.  This 
was  an  effort  of  the  human  mind,  by  means  of  its  affections,  to  connect 
itself  immediately  with  the  Deity.  It  was  not  unfriendly  to  the  Church,  but 
it  was  earnest  against  the  moral  abuses  found  there.  Bernard  discovered 
the  highest  life  which  man  can  attain  in  a  perpetual  love  of  God,  which, 
while  it  is  vigorous  in  action  and  in  self-denials,  poetic  in  its  utterances,  and 
the  source  of  all  spiritual  knowledge  of  God,  is  neverthele^  conscious  that 
it  is  itself  inexpressible,  (a)  Richard  of  St,  Victor  (d.  1173),  by  means  of 
biblical  allegories,  made  known  the  secrets  of  the  human  heart  struggling  for 
words,  for  he  describes  the  process  of  contemplation  as  one  in  whose  highest 
flights  the  soul  in  ecstatic  rapture  is  perfectly  blessed  with  intuitions  of  the 
diviue  glory,  (h)  The  fanciful  nature  of  this  spirit  appears  in  the  revelations 
of  Hililegard^  Abbess  of  the  convent  of  Rupert,  near  Bingen  (d.  1178). 
Under  the  sanction  of  St.  Bernard,  they  were  acknowledged  to  be  actual 
divine  revelations,  because  the  figures  and  allegories  in  which  they  wero 
clothed  were  agreeable  to  the  taste  of  her  contemporaries.  But  although  they 
revealed  nothing  supernatural,  they  contained  many  profound  views  of  the 
mysteries  of  history.  {*-)  In  the  convent  of  St.  Victor  near  Paris,  ever  since 
its  founder  (1109),  William  of  Champeavx^  had  been  obliged  to  give  way 
before  the  more  brilliant  reputation  of  his  pupil  Abelard,  a  reconciliation  had 
been  sought  between  Mysticism  and  Scholasticism,  on  the  ground  that  the 
latter  was  represented  by  inspired  men,  and  the  former  professed  to  be  a 
series  of  spiritual  elevations,  (r/)  The  profoundly  spiritual  mind  of  Hugo  of 
St.  Victor  (died  1141),  naturally  inclined  to  discover  the  points  of  agreement 
between  different  systems,  regarded  Scholasticism  as  an  excellent  preparation 
for  Mysticism,  since  it  intelligently  established  the  doctrines  of  the  latter, 
and  in  its  perfection  must  lead  the  soul  up  to  the  enjoyment  of  ecstatic  emo- 
tions, lie  therefore  regarded  each  of  these  tendencies  of  the  mind  as  the 
complement  and  correlative  of  the  other,  (e)    The  union  of  these  distinct  ele- 


d)  Especially,  De  contcmtu  mundi,  de  consideratioDe,  de  dlllgcndo  Deo,  Tr.  ad  Hugonem  de  8. 
Vict  comp.  $  207. 

h)  E«pocia]Iy,  De  statu  inter  honilnia,  de  praepar.  animi  ad  contempl.  s.  Benjamin  minor,  de  gra- 
tia conteinpl.  s.  BenJ.  major.  0pp.  Hothom.  1650.  t—LUbner,  Rich,  a  S.  Vict  do  eonteropL  doctriniL 
Gott  1S37.  P.  I.    Etigelhardt,  Kicli.  v.  8.  Victor  u.  Ruysbroek.  Erl.  1S3S, 

c)  Scitku,  (Ucvclationes  S.  Vlrgg.  Ilildeg.  et  P:ii8.  Col.  162!^  f.)  Liber  dlvlnorum  opp.  simplidi 
hominis.  comp.  ^fannl  ad  Fabric.  Blbl.  med.  et  In£  Lat  Th.  III.  cd.  PaUiv.  p.  2638JS.— C.  Ifeinert, 
de  S.  Hild.  vita.  (Coinm.  Soc  Oott  Tb.  XIL  Claasi.  bist  et  ph.)    J.  K.  Dahl,  d.  b.  Uild.  Mainz.  1881 
Gdrres,  vol.  I.  p.  2N'is».  II.  p.  210s. 
.  d)  SchlohHf.r^  Abb.  zu  Vincent  v.  Beaavals'  Ilandb.  Frkf.  1S19.  vol.  IL 

e)  Eftpccially,  do  uacramcntls  cbr.  fidei  L  II.  Opp.  Kothom.  1643.  3  Th.  t  According  to  tbe  prooft 
addacod  by  Li^hn^r.  (Stud.  u.  Krit  1S31.  part  2.  p.  2^4«l.)  tbe  Tractitus  tbeol.  ascribed  to  Ilildebert 
(Ilildeb.  Opp.  ed.  Beaugendre,  Par.  1703.  C)  contains  nothing  except  tbe  first  four  books  of  Hugo's 
Summa  Bententt 


CHAP.  IV.    ECCLES.  8CIENCK    $  219.  JOHN  OF  SALIS.    $  220.  ABELABD.       241 

ments  of  the  age  after  all  never  became  a  prominent  result,  for  even  Hugo^s 
successor,  Kichard,  declared  decidedly  in  favor  of  Mysticism,  and  Walter  of 
St.  Victor  (1180),  who  had  studied  under  Richard,  assailed  the  most  celebra- 
ted loaders  of  the  French  Scholastic  party  as  sophists  and  heretics.  (/)  lie 
defended  Mysticism  without  really  being  a  Mystic,  but  JoJui  of  Salisbury^  a 
faithful  companion  of  Becket,  and  who  became,  after  the  assassination  of  that 
prelate,  a  bishop  of  Chartres  (d.  1182),  stood,  hke  one  conversant  with  Ro- 
mans and  Greeks,  in  an  entirely  different  position.  It  is  true  that  he  justi- 
fied philosophy  on  account  of  its  general  utility  for  moral  purposes,  but 
honestly  exposing  his  pride  of  an  empty  knowledge  to  the  ridicule  of  his 
contemporaries,  he  predicted,  as  a  warning  to  others,  that  Scholasticism,  in 
the  course  of  its  scientific  investigations,  would  lose  the  truth.  (^) 

§  220.     Ahelard,  1079-1142. 

L  Letters  of  Abelard  and  1Ielui«e,  especially  Ep.  I.  in  the  Kuits  De  bistoria  calamitatnm  saarnm, 
vlth  notes  by  Du  Che^ne.  Intrudiictiu  ad  Tbcol  L  III.  incomp^to.  {Abiul.  et  I/el.  0pp.  ed.  ylm- 
hoUe,  Par.  1616.  4.)  TlieoL  chr.  I.  V.  {Martens  Thoa.  Anecd.  Tli.  V.  p.  1156.)  Etiilcji  a.  L.  aclto  te 
iimm.  (f r3 ji,  Anecd.  v.  III.  P.  II.  p.  627.)— Dial  inter  Philos.,  Judacam  et  Christian,  cii.  Rkein- 
teoU^  Ber.  1S81.  Sic  et  non.  Dialcctica.  (and  dialectical  fragments  in:  Ouvragej)  \wiiK\\\s  iF Ahelard 
pablie*  par  Victor  Cou9in^  Par.  1S36.  4)  Sic  et  Non.  Primuin  integrum  cdd.  E.  L,  Ilt^ik^  et  O.  & 
UtuJeuMil^  Marb.  1S51.  From  his  school :  Abael.  Epitome  Thcol.  chr.  ed.  Rheinwald,  Ber.  1985. 
[Abailtfiii  et  IleL  Epp.  Oxon.  172S.  8.  Lettrcs  d'Ab.  et  llel.  traduits  sur  les  ninnui'crits  de  la  bib- 
BotlL  royal  p.  E.  Oddotil,  pr^cdos  d'un  Essa!  hist  p.  M.  et  Mme  Guizot,  Par.  18:39.  2  voU.] 

IL  <;«rr'ii*».  vie  de  P.  Ab.  et  lUl  Par.  (1720)  1723.  2  Th.  Hist  lit  de  la  Fr.  Th.  XII.  p.  86.  62988. 
/  Berington^  Hist,  of  the  Lives  of  Ab.  and  UeL  from  1079-1168,  with  the  Letters  from  the  Coll.  of 
Amboii<>.  Binning.  17SS.  4  Sc/tlo8^er,  Ab.  u.  Dulcin,  Leben  e.  Sch warmers  u.  e.  Phil.  Ooth.  1S07. 
/.  II.  F.  FttrichK,  de  Ab.  doct  dogm.  et  mor.  Jen.  1727.  Cou«in^  Introduction  to  his  edition. 
/  D.  H.  Goldhorn^  de  snmmi.^  princlpils  Theol.  Ab.  Lfis»  1&.S6.  JK  A.  LetoaUiy  de  0pp.  Ab.  qnae 
CflOslB  ed  Ueidelb.  1S89.  4  Ftanck,  Bcllr.  asu  WQrdlg.  Ab.  (Tab.  Ztltachr.  IWO.  II.  4)  M.  Ca- 
•*»■<  Ab.  u.  HeL  Giesa.  1S44  J.  A  Jacohi,  Ab.  u.  llel.  Brl.  1850.  F.  Braun,  de  Ab.  Ethica.  Marb. 
1«1  [0.  W.  Wight,  The  Romance  of  Ab.  and  Uel.  New  York.  1S58.  12.  Bohringer,  Church  of 
Christ  and  its  Witnesses,  in  last  vol  1S54] 

In  its  opposition  to  Scliolasticism,  Mysticism  found  its  most  dbtinguished 
anta^nist  in  Abelard.  His  reputation  in  the  schoob  was  more  brilliant,  his 
spirit  more  liberal,  his  familiarity  with  the  ancient  Roman  writers  more  inti- 
ntte,  and  his  independence  of  the  ecclesiastical  fathers  greater,  than  that  of 
«iy  of  his  associates  of  the  schoListic  party.  He  regarded  the  principle,  that 
nothing  is  to  be  believed  which  is  not  understood,  as  the  primary  maxim  of 
tbit  school.  This  doctrine  of  the  supremacy  of  reason,  when  taken  in  con- 
J^ection  with  that  of  the  absolute  authority  of  the  Church  in  matters  of  faith, 
^bich  was  equally  sustained  by  Abelard,  produced  an  obvious  incongruity  in 
bis  fandaniental  principles.  Even  in  his  youth  he  took  delight  in  vanquish- 
H  the  most  renowned  teachers  of  that  period  by  his  dialectic  skill.  He 
^Qght  (after  1115)  on  Mount  St.  Genevieve,  and  became  the  most  celebrated 


/)  Cootra  novas  haeresca,  qu&<)  Sophistae  Abaelardus,  Lombar<lus,  Pctrus  Pictav.  et  Gilber- 
^  I'orretan.  libris  sentt  c^uarum  acuunt  Generally  called :  Contra  quatuor  labyrinthos  Galiiae. 
**«»ia  ^o^a«  U.  Univ.  Paris.  Th.  II.  p.  2'JO.  402.  662.  629ss.  A.  Planck,  Q.  d.  8chr.  d.  Walth. 
'•*•  V.  (Stuii  u.  Krit  1*44  IL  4) 

^  PoHcraticna  S.  de  nagis  cnrialium  et  vcstigiis  phUosophor.  1.  YIII.  Lugd  1689.  Metaloglotis, 
^  ^^-  /''.  1610.  Epp.  80a  (Bibl  PP.  max.  voL  XXIIL  p.  242.)— /Tl  Reuter,  Job,  v.  Saliab.  Ber- 

16 


-242  MEDIAEVAL  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  IlL    A.  D.  80a-12ie. 

instructor  in  philosophy  and  theology  then  in  Paris.  It  was  there  that  he 
found  the  higltest  rapture  and  the  deepest  grief  in  his  love  of  Heloise.  Her 
lofty  spirit  scorned  to  become  the  wife  of  Abelard,  for  she  thought  sach  a 
connection  incompatible  with  his  attainment  of  those  ecclesiastical  dignities 
which  she  regarded  as  his  proper  right.  Even  this  hope  her  relatives 
attempted  to  baffle  by  an  act  of  most  shameful  atrocity  (1119).  Abelard 
then  took  refuge  from  the  world  in  the  convent  of  St.  Denys,  where  in  an 
earnest  penitential  spirit  he  was  gradually  enabled  to  praise  God  for  the 
chastisements  which  he  had  endured.  Heloise  was  induced  solely  by  her 
attachment  to  him  to  take  the  veil.  Compelled  to  return  to  his  station  as  an 
instructor  by  the  solicitations  of  the  academical  youth,  he  was  opposed  by 
the  combined  jealousy  of  the  Scholastics  and  the  hatred  of  the  Mystics.  At 
a  synod  held  at  SoUaona  (1121),  at  which  a  legate  presided,  his  "Introduc- 
tion to  Theology "  was  condemned  to  be  burnt  as  an  infidel  representation 
of  the  doctrine  of  the  Holy  Trinity,  and  he  himself  was  sentenced  unheard  to 
be  confined  in  a  very  retired  convent.  But  such  severe  ill-treatment  only 
increased  the  sympathy  of  the  people  with  him,  and  he  was  soon  after  per- 
mitted by  the  legate  to  return  to  St.  Denys.  When,  however,  he  was  per- 
secuted by  the  monks  on  account  of  his  discovery  that  Dionysius  of  Paris 
was  not  the  Areopagite,  he  betook  himself  to  a  wilderness  near  Nogent.  Im- 
mense multitudes  followed  him  to  this  retreat  that  they  might  listen  to  his 
instructions,  and  in  a  forest  they  constructed  a  multitude  of  huts,  and  a  temple 
which  he  dedicated  to  the  Spirit,  the  Comforter.  When  threatened  with  new 
persecutions,  he  committed  this  Paraclete  to  the  care  of  Heloise  as  its  abbess, 
and  consented  to  become  the  abbot  of  the  convent  of  St.  Gildas  at  Rnits,  in 
Brittany,  to  which  he  had  been  elected  (1126).  Here  for  ten  years  he  strug- 
gled unsuccessfully  to  establish  monastic  discipline,  when  he  gave  up  the 
attempt  and  returned  to  give  lectures  once  more  as  a  professor  in  Paris. 
There  ho  was  opposed  by  a  crowd  of  enemies  under  the  direction  of  St,  Ber- 
nard, A  catalogue  of  alleged  heresies  was  extracted  from  his  writingSi,  many 
of  which  were  contrary  to  the  ordinary  mode  of  instruction  in  the  Ohnrch, 
or  would  admit  of  inferences  inconsistent  with  the  orthodox  creed.  The  real 
controversy  related  to  the  subject  of  Scholasticism  itself,  which  was  accused 
of  desecrating  divine  mysteries  by  its  daring  attempts  at  analysis,  {a)  The 
spirit  of  Abelard  was  now  broken,  and  when  his  writings  were  condemned 
at  a  synod  held  at  Sen8  (1140),  he  appealed  to  the  pope,  by  whom  he  was 
doomed  on  Bernard's  representation  to  a  perpetual  confinement  in  a  con- 
vent, (b)  An  asylum  was  finally  secured  for  him  by  Peter  of  Clttgny,  and 
when  he  died  the  body  of  her  friend  was  committed  to  the  hands  of  He- 
loise (c)  as  an  offering  richly  adorned  by  God  himself  in  behalf  of  mental 
freedom,  not  only  in  the  literary  but  in  the  social  world.  It  is  diflScult  to 
tell  whether  he  was  most  beloved  or  hated  by  the  age  in  which  he  lived. 


a)  Bemardi  Ep.  18S.  ad  Cardlnales.  169.  ad  Innoc  Tr.  do  errorlb.  Ab.  ad  Innoc  (Opp.  Th.  IV. 
pi  114.)    Also  with  the  Index  XIX.  capituL  in  the  works  of  Abelard.  ^ 

h)  Docnrnentd  of  Synod,  sent  to  the  pope  bj-  Bernard^  Ep.  8T0.  Abelarda  Apology  in  <^k><i<^^'^ 
to  Bernanl  in  bis  Kp.  20.  (0pp.  p.  880e&)  Satires  respecUng  the  Synod  and  St  Bernard  by  Btrmkr 
gariua  ScholasticM,  Apologet  pro  magistro  c.  Bernard.  {Abaelardi  0pp.  p.  SOSaa.) 

c)  Petri  Yen.  Ep.  ad  Uel.  HeloUmt  ad  Petrura.  {Ahati.  0\^  p.  SSTaa.) 


CHAP.  IT.    SOCLES.  SCIENCE.    %  221.  SAC  SCRIPT.    $  222.  NIEBBLUNOEN.      243 

§  221.     Thi!  Sacred  Scriptures, 

Many  works  upon  the  Scriptures  were  written  by  persons  belonging  to  the 
circles  of  the  Mystics  and  the  Scholastics,  but  although  they  exhibited  a  high 
degree  of  mental  acuteness  and  sprightliness,  they  displayed  an  entire  want 
of  a  proper  conception  of  the  peculiarities  of  ancient  times.    Though  these 
peculiarities  were  not  unknown  to  the  authors,  they  nevertheless  received  a 
deep  coloring  from  the  outward  relations  of  the  modern  world,  and  yet  were 
represented  as  a  tradition  from  the  past    An  abundant  literature  was  also 
formed  around  the  sacred  writings.    In  her  Pleasure  Garden,  Herrad^  the 
Abbess  of  Landsperg  (about  1176),  has  contrived  to  weave  into  the  scrip- 
taral  history  a  general  summary  of  all  secular  knowledge,  (a)     All  kinds 
of  literature  are  full  of  allusions  to  something  in  the  Bible.    But  although 
the  Jews  were  induced  by  their  Arabic  learning  to  investigate  the  He- 
brew text,  the  Scriptures  were  interpreted  by  ecclesiastical  writers  with- 
oat  any  important  aid  from  a  knowledge  of  other  languages.    The  vari- 
008  manuscripts  of  the  Vulgate  differed  widely  from  each  other.    The  glosses 
of  Walqfrid  Strdbo  (849)  and  Anselm  of  Laon  (d.  1117),  were  generally  used, 
although  they  were  nothing  but  verbal  definitions  and  paraphrases  derived 
from  the  ecclesiastical  fathers,  (b)    In  the  more  extended  commentaries,  four 
different  senses  were  presupposed  in  every  scriptural  passage ;  the  historical 
meaning  was  regarded  only  as  the  vestibule  to  the  sanctuary,  and  whatever 
life  appeared  was  expended  in  the  play  of  allegorical  interpretations.    Ru' 
perif  Abbot  of  Deutz  (d.  1136),  endeavored  to  re-establish  all  theology  upon 
the  basis  of  the  Holy  Scriptures,  as  the  great  Book  through  which  God  has 
intelligently  presented  the  way  of  salvation  to  all  nations,  (c)     When  the 
Slaves  endeavored  to  retain  the  use  of  their  own  national  language  in  their 
rdigioos  worship,  they  were  opposed  by  Gregory  VII,  (1080),  who  was  the 
first  that  ventured  to  censure  the  use  of  the  Scriptures  in  the  vernacular 
tongue,  and  justified  this  opposition  by  a  reference  to  the  mysteries  of  the 
primitive  Church.  (</) 

S  222.    Commencement  of  a  National  Literature  in  the  Twelfth  Century. 

A£iint  reflection  of  the  ancient  national  glory  long  remained,  almost  en- 
tirely imafiected  by  the  influence  of  Christianity,  in  the  hearts  of  the  people, 
and  was  exhibited  in  the  German  epic  poetry.  This  finally  received  a  per- 
manent written  form  during  the  thirteenth  century,  in  the  composition  called 
The  Xiebelungen.  (a)  The  popular  fable  of  the  Court  of  the  Beasts  was  a 
pletBant  representation  of  human  society  among  a  people  conversant  with 
the  simple  life  of  the  forest.  As  this  story  had  already  been  to  some  extent 
amilarly  applied  by  some  of  his  predecessors,  it  was  formed  by  a  monk  of 
Clngny  about  the  middle  of  the  twelfth  century  into  the  fable  of  Reinardus^ 

0)  Hortos  dellcfauoini,  a  roannwript  with  miniatures  in  the  Lib.  at  Strasbnrg.  Engelhardt^  Her- 
'»*  T^  n.  llir  H.  delic  Stuttg.  1818. 

^  WiiUi/ridi  Oloeea  ordlnaria  in  Biblla.  (0pp.  Par.  1852.  2  yolfli  In  the  Patrol  ed.  Migne,  voL 
^^HL)  An$dmi  Oloeea  loterlinearis.  Bas.  1S02.  t  and  often. 

f)  BuperU  TuUienM%,  Opp.  Mog.  1681.  2  Th.  t      d)  Greg,  I  VII.  Ep.  11. 

«)  [Tbe  FaU  of  the  Niebelongcn,  dec  traniL  hy  W.  IT.  Letttom^  Loud.  186a] 


244  MEDIAEVAL  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  ILL    A.  D.  800-12161 

which  contained  an  ironical  satire  upon  the  gluttony  of  the  monks,  and  the 
avarice  of  tlie  popes,  {h)  Independent  of  the  clergy,  and  yet  in  the  midst 
of  the  enthusiasm  of  the  first  Crusades,  sprung  up  the  joyous^  art  of  the 
Troubmlovrif.  With  passionate  zeal  it  entered  into  all  the  discussions  of  the 
age,  and  though  its  inspirations  were  sometimes  employed  in  singing  the  ex- 
ploits of  the  Oliurch,  it  was  at  other  times  equally  fearless  in  opposing  the 
bad  practices  of  the  hierarchy,  and  was  always  independent  of  ecclesiastical 
control,  (c)  The  Suabian  minnesingers^  the  nightingales  of  the  middle  ages, 
near  the  close  of  the  first  half  of  tlie  twelfth  century  began  to  sing  of  earthly 
love,  joy,  imd  sorrow.  The  ordinary  feelings  with  which  men  regarded  the 
Blessed  Virgin  were  transferred  by  these  minstrels  to  the  whole  female  sex.  {d) 
Walter  of  the  Vogeliceide  penetrated  far  into  the  mysterious  emotions  of  genu- 
ine Christianity,  and  yet  confessed  with  childlike  candor  that  he  found  in  his 
heart  notliing  like  love  toward  his  enemies.  On  the  other  band,  with  the 
spirit  of  a  real  German,  he  set  himself  in  opposition  to  all  priestly  dissimula- 
tion and  the  unrighteous  ban  which  the  pope  had  imposed  upon  his  country. 
A  vivid  picture  of  the  Crusades  is  presented  in  the  legends  and  songs  relat- 
ing to  the  expedition  of  Charles  the  Great  into  Spain.  In  these  poems  that 
monarch,  who  is  called  pre-eminently  the  servant  of  God,  with  his  twelve 
paladins,  are  described  as  exposing  their  bodies  to  the  most  imminent  perils 
for  the  benefit  of  their  souls.  Instead  of  the  treasures  of  the  Niebel- 
ungenlied  with  its  heathenish  spirit,  we  now  have  the  story  of  the  San 
Graal.  The  knightly  epic,  however,  when  it  became  fully  developed,  was 
not  much  pervaded  by  the  ecclesiastical  spirit.  The  meditative  Wolfram 
of  Eschenhach^  in  his  poem  of  the  Parzival,  enters  indeed  into  the  proper 
ideas  of  the  Church,  distinguishes  between  the  ideal  and  the  actual,  and 
describes  the  expiations  and  tlie  external  holiness  which  are  necessary 
to  the  enjoyment  of  a  higher  life,  but  what  he  describes  is  not  an  eccle- 
siastical expiation,  and  the  guai'dians  of  his  sanctuary  are  not  priests,  hot 
holy  knights  and  a  divinely  consecrated  king.  The  luminous  Godfrey  of 
Strashurg  in  his  Tristan  described  the  sumptuous  life  of  the  court,  in  which, 
totally  regardless  of  the  decisions  of  the  Church,  the  eternal  rights  of  the 
heart  were  treated  as  inviolable,  even  when  opposed  to  what  was  then  called 
the  sacrament  of  marriage,  {e)  As  early  as  the  time  of  the  Othos,  laymen 
generally  scorned  the  cultivation  of  every  kind  of  science,  and  towards  the 
close  of  the  twelfth  century  the  clergy  entirely  renounced  the  study  of  all 
literature  in  the  language  of  the  people.  The  general  result  of  all  the  influ- 
ence of  this  age  was,  that  the  clergy  entirely  lost  the  monopoly  they  had  pre- 
viously possessed  in  the  mental  cultivation  of  the  people.  (/)  Hence,  at  the 
same  time  with  the  ecclesiastical  sciences,  a  species  of  poetry  was  formed, 
dictated  solely  by  those  feelings  which  exist  in  every  human  bosom.  It  was 
not,  however,  a  poetry  altogether  popular  in  its  character,  for  it  was  highly 


h)  Gervinus^  Oesch.  iL  poet  Nation.  Literatur.  vol.  L  p.  lOSaa.  ^ 

c)  The  partlculara  in  Jlillot,  Baynonard  u.  unserm  Dietz. 

d)  a  Barthfl,  Oppoa.  gegen  die  Hierarcbie.  Walther  y.  d.  Y.  (Zeitsob.  t  hiat  Th.  1846.  H.  &) 

e)  The  particulars  in  Oorrea,  Lachmann,  Oritnuif  Oervinua,  and  Hagen. 
/)  Comp.  ff,  LeOi  y.  d.  deben  Yramichelten.  (HaL)  1889. 


CHAP.  Y.    SXTENS.  OF  THE  CHUBCH.    %  22a  DENMARK.    SWEDEN.       245 

artificial,  and  adapted  only  to  tlie  cbivalroas  tastes  of  the  knights.  The 
most  hrilliant  exhibitions  of  its  power  were  presented  at  the  court  of  the 
Hohenstaafens. 


CHAP,  v.— EXTENSION  OF  THE  ROMAN  CATHOLIC  CHURCH. 

Adam*  Brem.  ({  170.)  I^tud.  de  sfta  Daniae  et  rellqnaram,  quae  trans  Daniam  sunt,  regionum 
Mtan,  aMribb  et  reL  ed.  Fabric  Uamb.  UOd.  I 

§  223.     The  Holy  Ansgar.    801-805. 

L  A  letter  of  Ansgar  and  the  Life  of  St.  WUlehad.  {PeirU  Th.  II.  p.  878.)  Vita  Anskarii  by 
bis  folk>wer  RimberL  (Ed.  Dahlmann  in  PerU  Th.  II.  p.  6S3.)  Life  of  a  Willehad  and  S.'Ansgar, 
aeben.  m.  Aom.  v.  Carsten  MUe^afs^  Brm.  1826.  S.  Anskarii  Ptgmenta.  Written  with  the  assist- 
aace  of  Lappenburg^  Ilarab.  1844 

XL  JS.  C  Kruac^  S.  Ansgar.  Alton.  18281  F.  A.  KnimmacJuTy  S.  Ansgar.  alte  u.  neue  ZeiL 
Brvm.  1S2S.  //.  ReutenlaAl^  Ansg.  n.  d.  An&ngspunkt  d.  Chr.  in  Schwed.  ft*om  the  Swedish  by 
Matftrhqf^  BrL  1SS7.  F.  C.  Kraffl,  Narr.  do  Ansg.  aquilonarium  gentium  Apost  Hamb.  1840.  4. 
Q.  n.  Klippd^  Lebensbeschr.  d.  Ercb.  An^g.  Brem.  1845.  [Dtplomatarium  Norvegicunif  ed.  by 
(Z  jMng€  and  C.  R.  Unger^  to  bo  in  10  Tola.,  bat  only  the  Ist  part  in  1849,  and  the  2d  in  1852,  are 
ret  pubL  Cbristiaoia.  4to.] 

The  Danish  prince  JTarald  having  obtained  the  throne  of  his  ancestors 
by  the  assistance  of  Louis  the  Pious,  after  a  long  contest  with  his  competi- 
tora,  became  a  willing  instrument  by  which  the  policy  of  the  Prankish 
monarch  might  be  carried  out  in  his  own  country.  He  was  baptized  in  the 
city  of  Mentz  (826),  and  his  followers  were  delighted  with  the  splendid  gifts 
conferred  on  them  by  the  sponsors.  On  his  return  to  Jutland,  he  was  accora- 
ptnied  by  Ansgar^  a  monk  of  Oorvey,  who  had  been  induced  by  his  religions 
feeKngg  and  a  vision  of  Christ,  to  consecrate  himself  to  the  work  of  convert- 
ing the  heathen.  The  archbishopric  of  Hamburg  was  founded  for  him  by 
Lonis  the  Pious  with  the  papal  consent  (881),  for  the  propagation  of  Chris- 
tianity in  the  Northern  countries.  As  this  city  was  soon  after  pillaged  by 
pirttes,  from  whose  ravages  nothing  was  saved  by  Ansgar  but  some  relics, 
his  archbishopric  was  attached  by  the  Gorman  king  and  the  pope  to  the 
hiahopric  of  Bremen  (849).  Having  beeA  appointed  the  papal  legate  and  the 
hnperia], ambassador  for  the  northern  nations,  Ansgar  resided  in  this  latter 
oty,  and  possessed  an  influence  among  those  people  which  prepared  the  way 
for  his  subsequent  efforts  in  Jutland  and  Sleswio.  He  was  not,  indeed,  very 
seriondy  opposed  in  his  labors,  except  by  the  indifference  of  the  people. 
This  he  endeavored  to  overcome  by  obtaining  possession  of  heathen  children, 
Mid  by  ransoming  those  persons  who  had  been  carried  into  captivity,  and 
•raining  them  to  be  future  missionaries.  On  his  first  mission  to  Sweden 
^829),  he  found  some  germs  of  Christianity  already  existing  there,  and  by 
the  favor  of  the  court  he  was  permitted  to  plant  some  ftirther  seeds  of  the 
P>spel  among  the  people.  These,  however,  were  soon  after  entirely  de- 
stroyed in  a  popular  insurrection.  His  second  visit  to  that  country  (855)  was 
"^ore  sQcoeasfuI,  since  the  proclamation  of  the  new  faith  was  then  tolerated 
^^  the  people  and  their  gods,  on  account  of  the  protection  afforded  by  the 
^  of  the  Christians  to  those  who  went  to  sea.    He  was  often  discovered 


246  MEDIAEVAL  CnUBCH  HISTOBY.    FEB.  IIL    A.  D.  800-12161 

by  Reimbert  in  tears,  because  he  was  not  regarded  by  his  Lord  worthy  of 
the  martyrdom  which  he  supposed  had  been  promised  him. 

§  224.     German  Nations  of  the  North. 

The  fonndation  which  had  been  laid  by  Ansgar  in  Denmark  was  protected 
and  enkrged  by  the  influence  of  the  Saxon  emperors,  although  it  was  viewed 
with  great  dishke  by  many  as  the  religion  of  their  national  enemies.  The 
cause  of  Christianity,  however,  gained  new  strength  by  the  continuance  of 
their  connection  with  the  Normans.  This  people,  ever  since  the  commence- 
ment of  the  tenth  century,  had  obtained  possessions  by  conquest  in  England 
and  France,  and  had  adopted  the  faith  as  well  as  the  higher  civilization  of 
the  conquered  nations.  The  triumph  of  the  new  religion  was  finally  secured 
through  the  conquest  of  England  by  the  Danish  kings.  Canute  the  Great 
secured  the  union  of  Denmark  with  England,  and  the  reconciliation  of  the 
two  nations  by  the  establishment  of  the  Church  among  the  Danes;  and 
while  he  was  on  his  pilgrimage  to  Rome  (1027),  in  accordance  with  his  pre- 
vious stipulations,  it  was  connected  with  the  Roman  Church,  (a)  By  means 
of  persons  sent  forth  from  Bremen,  Christianity  continued  to  extend  itself 
in  Siceden,  and  though  at  first  its  progress  was  slow,  it  was  without  opposi- 
tion, and  connected  with  many  harmless  heathen  customs.  Alms  and  fasts 
were  vowed  to  the  Lord  Christ  by  a  city  in^  time  of  distress,  though  it  was 
still  in  a  state  of  heathenism.  The  drinking  horns  of  heathen  chiefs  were 
not  unfrequently  emptied  to  the  health  of  Christ  and  of  the  archangel 
Michael.  The  series  of  Christian  kings  commenced  with  Olaf  SchooUkonig 
(1008),  but  the  temple  of  Odin  at  Upsala  was  not  destroyed,  until,  after  a 
sanguinary  contest,  it  was  levelled  with  the  ground  by  King  Inge  (1075).  (5) 
The  gospel  was  conveyed  to  Norway  in  the  ninth  century  by  some  seafaring 
youth,  but  the  white  Christ  was  generally  regarded  by  the  people  as  the  god 
of  a  foreign  nation.  Harald  Harfagar^  in  a  public  assembly,  took  an  oath 
that  he  would  never  again  present  an  offering  to  deities  whose  sway  extended 
merely  to  his  own  country,  but  only  to  one  who  was  Lord  of  the  whole 
earth,  and  by  whose  help  he  hoped  to  extend  his  authority  over  all  Norway. 
And  yet  when  his  son  Hacon  the  Qood  (936-950),  who  had  been  educated 
and  baptized  in  England,  thereupon  proposed  that  all  the  people  should  be 
baptized,  not  only  was  the  proposal  rejected,  but  the  prince  was  compelled  to 
feign  that  a  cross  which  he  had  formed  upon  Odin^s  cup  was  int^ided  for  the 
sign  of  Thor's  hammer.  At  his  funeral  the  Skald  proclaimed  that  he  had  been 
admitted  to  the  Valhalla,  because  he  had  mildly  forborne  to  destroy  the  sacred 
things  belonging  to  the  ancient  gods.  The  cause  of  Christianity,  however, 
had  now  become  identified  with  that  of  the  supreme  monarchs  of  the  coon- 

o)  Sawo  Orammaticus^  (died  about  1804.)  Hist  Danicae  L  XVI.  ed.  SiephaniuA,  Bor.  1644.  8 
Til.  t  Klotz^  LpB.  1771.  A.—Pantoppidan^  Annal.  Eco.  Dan.  dii»lomatici.  Hanr.  1741as.  Th.  I. 
Jf&nter^  KOeach.  v.  Dancm.  n.  Norw.  Lpz.  1828.  toL  I.  F.  C.  DaAlmann^  Qtaeh.  r.  Dinoem. 
Hamh.  1840.  toI.  I.  p.  28^ 

b)  Claudii  Oemhjulm,  Hist  Sneonnm  Gotboramqae  ecc  1.  IV.  Stockb.  1689.  4.  Btatuta  syiM>* 
dalla  vet  Ecc  Sucvogotbicae,  ed.  ReuUrdahl,  Lond.  1841.  4. — Oeijer,  Qoscb.  Scbwed.  A.  d.  schwed. 
Handschr.  t.  Leffler,  Uamb.  188a  toI.  L  [F.  C.  Oeijer^  H.  of  tbe  8w«de9L  TYansL  fh>m  tbe  Swcdiib, 
by  J.  n,  7Vtrfi«r,  Lend.  1347. 8.] 


CHAP.  V.    EXTEN8.  OP  THE  CHUECH.    S  ««•  NORWAY.    ICELAND.         247 

try,  and  the  former  kings  of  the  particolar  tribes  were  as  tenacious  of  their 
ancient  gods,  as  they  were  of  the  private  rights  sanctioned  by  those  deities. 
The  wild  and  intriguing  influence  of  Olaf  Trygtesen  (995-1000)  was  ex- 
pended in  accomplishing  the  triumph  of  the  Church,  to  effect  which  he  was 
supplied  with  priests  from  England  and  Bremen.     Ohtf  the  Thicl\  who  be- 
came king  of  Norway  in  the  year  1019,  in  an  expedition  he  made  at  the  head 
of  his  army  throughout  his  kingdom,  arranged  the  affairs  of  the  Church  on 
a  permanent  basis.    Dissatisfied,  however,  with  his  policy,  the  heathen  por- 
tion of  the  nation  delivered  up  his  kingdom  into  the  hands  of  Canute  the 
Great.     In  defence  of  the  cause  of  the  cross,  Olaf  appealed  to  the  religious 
enthusiasm  of  his  subjects,  and  finally  perished  in  a  disastrous  battle  (1083). 
But  even  in  the  succeeding  year,  when  hatred  began  to  be  awakened  in  the 
bosoms  of  the  Normans  against  the  dominion  of  foreigners,  a  strong  feeling 
of  attachment  for  Olaf  was  revived,  and  his  body  being  taken  from  its  grave, 
was  found  free  from  decay.    From  that  time,  under  the  name  of  St.  Olafi 
be  has  been  invoked  as  the  patron  saint  of  Norway,  and  after  a  single  cen- 
tury he  was  honored  by  all  the  Northern  nations,  (r)    In  Iceland^  Christian- 
ity having  been  proclaimed  by  several  transient  messengers,  Olaf  Trygvesen 
at  last  found  a  permanent  lodgment,  and  after  a  severe  conflict  it  was  for  the 
sake  of  peace  accepted  at  a  general  assembly  of  the  people  (1000),  though 
with  the  condition  that  men  might  worship  the  ancient  gods  in  private,  and 
that  cMldren  might  be  publicly  exposed  without  molestation,  (d)    About  this 
time,  also,  a  flourishing  bishopric  was  erected  by  some  emigrants  from  Iceland 
on  the  eastern  shore  of  Greenland,  whose  tithes  were  paid  at  Rome  in  the 
teeth  of  walruses,  (e)    In  all  these  Northern  countries  the  moral  and  social 
spirit  of  Christianity  had  to  contend  with  the  custom  of  private  revenge  for 
Uood  shed  by  enemies,  the  right  of  a  freeman  to  commit  suicide,  the  expo- 
tore  of  children,  and  the  eating  of  the  flesh  of  horses  and  of  vultures. 
When  the  images  of  the  gods  were  destroyed  by  bold  and  powerful  men  with 
no  ^vine  judgments  following  the  action,  the  people  generally  acknowledged 
thit  Christ  was  the  superior  Deity.    The  ancient  world  of  the  gods  was  not, 
bowever,  entirely  renounced,  but  only  thrown  back  into  a  mysterious  abyss, 
ttid  converted  into  a  gloomy  kingdom  of  magic,  peopled  by  trolds,  nixies, 
ttd  elves.    There  was  indeed  a  legend  current  among  the  more  indulgent 
portion  of  the  people,  which  held  out  a  hope  that  even  the  spirits  of  nature 
would  in  some  future  period  be  redeemed  from  their  state  of  banishment.  (/) 


e)  L  Snorro  SturlMoru,  (died  1241.)  Heioukringla,  ed.  Schoeninff,  Hafn.  1777ss.  5  Th.  £  [Transl. 
btoEngL  by  &  Laing,  8  vote.  Lond.  1844.]  IL  Munter,  KOescb.  v.  D.  u.  Norw.  vol  I.  p.  481sa. 
\^  Crkkton,  Scandinavia.  Anc  and  MwL  &c  Edinb.  1839.  2  vote.  &  U.  W/teaton,  Hist  of  the 
Htrtkmen,  Ac  New  ed.  New  York.  1847.  2  vola.] 

^  L  Idendingabok  (by  priest  Are  the  Wise,  died  1148.)  c.  78A.  Ucbere.  in  Dahlmann's  Forsch. 
A^  1821  voL  L  p.  4726a.  JInngurcaka  a.  Iliat  primunini  VSkallioltenMuin  In  lt\.  Episcc  (IStb 
^t)  Hafti.  1778w  Kritini-Saga  a.  Utet  rel.  ctir.  In  IsL  introd.  (14th  cent)  Hafn.  1774.— II.  Finni 
^^^nti,  Hkst  ecc  laL  Hafh.  177288.  4  Tb.  4.  SUiudlin^  0.  kirchL  Geech.  u.  Gregur.  v.  Is).  (Rllist 
^^  ToL  XL  pt  1.)  Munter^  vol  I.  p.  ol9!&  [An  Uist  and  De5crip.  Account  of  Iceland,  Qrcen- 
lo'd.aiui  the  Faroe  lalanda,  &c  (Ed.  Cab.  Lib.)  Edinb.  and  New  York.  1840.] 

*)  TorfciH  Groenl.  antiqoa.  Ilafb.  1706.  Munter^  vol  L  p.  fid5sa.  Comp.  Autiquitates  Ameri- 
■b  Serr.  septentr.  reram  ante  €k>lambianar.  Ilafh.  1887.  4. 

/)  Qrimm,  MytboL  p.  279. 


248  MEDIAEVAL  CHUBCH  HISTOBT.    PER  UL    A.  D.  flOO-181«L 

One  resnlt  at  least  of  the  conversion  of  these  Northern  nations,  was  that 
those  countries  of  Europe  which  bordered  on  the  sea  were  no  longer  exposed 
to  the  ravages  of  pirates.  (</)  The  ecclesiastical  supervision  of  them  which 
had  previously  been  vested  in  the  see  of  Bremen  was  now  (1104)  transferred 
to  the  archbishopric  of  Lund. 

§  225.     The  Slavic  Nations, 

The  Slavic  nations  acknowledged  the  existence  of  a  Supreme  Being,  whom 
they  regarded  as  the  original  Creator  of  a^l  things,  but  they  also  paid  divine 
honors  to  a  race  of  gods  which  they  believod  to  have  sprung  from  him. 
Those  were  divided  into  two  classes,  6alled  the  white  and  the  black  deities. 
Although  the  latter  represented  the  destructive  powers  of  nature,  they  were 
not  viewed  as  absolutely  evil,  since  they  allowed  the  germ  of  life  to  remain 
even  in  the  things  which  they  decomposed.  Those  divinities  were  repre- 
sented by  uncouth  symbolical  forms,  and  in  the  several  tribes  there  were 
found  sacred  cities  and  a  hierarchy,  (r/)  Some  conversions  effected  among 
the  Slaves  by  Charles  the  Great  were  as  transitory  as  his  conquests.  The 
conversion  and  spiritual  superintendence  of  the  people  who  resided  near  the 
Danube  were  intrusted  to  their  neighbors,  the  Archbishops  of  Salzbnrg  and 
Lorch,  whose  rights  were  subsequently  possessed  by  the  Bishop  of  Passan. 
The  Slavic  nations,  however,  were  too  much  opposed  to  any  connection  with 
Germany,  (ind  too  little  acquainted  with  the  German  or  Latin  languages,  to  be 
influenced  by  a  Christianity  coming  to  them  from  that  quarter.  The  Holy 
Scriptures,  the  preaching  of  the  gospel,  and  the  services  of  religion,  were 
introduced  to  the  Moravians  in  the  Slavonian  language  by  two  Greek  monks 
(863),  Cyrillus  (Constantine)  and  Methodius^  who  became  connected  with 
Rome,  but  did  not  relinquish  their  peculiar  Greek  forms  of  worship.  Metho- 
dius was  consecrated  at  Rome  Archbishop  of  Moravia,  and  the  Slavish  forms 
of  worship  received  the  papal  sanction  (880),  on  the  ground  that  God  under- 
stood all  languages  and  should  be  worshipped  by  all  nations.  His  efforts, 
however,  to  erect  a  distinct  national  Church  met  with  continual  oi)position 
on  the  part  of  the  German  bishops,  and  finally  (908)  the  Moravian  kingdom 
was  divided  by  the  swords  of  the  Hungarians  and  Bohemians.  The  Shivish 
ritual  was  kept  up  under  these  new  rulers  in  only  a  few  churches,  principally 
in  Illyria.  (h)  Towards  the  close  of  the  ninth  century,  Borziwoi,  Duke  of 
Bohemia,  was  induced  by  the  flattering  promises  of  Methodius  to  receive  bap- 
tism. His  last  days  were  spent  with  his  sainted  wife  Litdmilla  in  retirement 
from  the  world.     Wencenlaus  (928-938),  his  grandson,  urged  forward  the 


g)  Adam  JSrem.  Do  situ  Dan.  c  96. 

a)  Frencel.  de  dii^  Sorabor.  et  al.  Slavor.  {ITqffinann^  Scrr.  rer.  Lnaat  Tb.  II.)  Mon€,  Geach. 
d.  Heidentb.  im  nunll.  Eur.  vol.  I.  p.  11  Its.  OieseUr^  0.  d.  Verbreitnng  cliristl.  dual.  Lehrbegr. 
nnter  d.  Slaren.  (Stud.  n.  Krit  1837.  II.  2.  p.  867s&)  HanmcK  ^^  Wis&  d.  slay.  Mytbua.  Lemb. 
1&42.    P.  J.  ScJiafiiHk,  slaw.  Alterlhftmer,  edit  by  WuUke,  Lpt  1848.  2  vols. 

h)  I.  Vita  ConsUntini,  by  a  contemporary  writer.  (AcU  8S.  Mart  Th.  IL  p.  19.)  rreabf- 
1m^  IHocleatia  (abontn^l),  Rcgnum  Slavor.  c  Ssa.  {Schldxer't  Nestor,  vol.  IIL  p.  153aB.)  ManH 
Tb.  XVIII.  p.  182t«.— II.  A»8emani  Kalendarta  Ecc  univ.  Rom.  1755.  4.  Tb-  III.  PUara  et  iforo- 
wet9,  Moravian  Hist  eccl.  et  pol.  BrunnL  ITSSea.  8  Tb.— </.  Dohrotonky:  Cyrill.  a.  Metb.  der  Slaren 
Apostel.  Trag.  1823.  Mahr.  Lepende  v.  Cyr.  u,  Mcth,  Prag.  182(1.— Qlagolldca,  Ueber  den  Urspr.  d. 
riim.  Slav.  Liturgie.  2  ed.  Prag.  1S82. 


CHAP.  y.    EXTENS.  OF  THE  GHUBCH.    S  885.  WENDS.    POLES.  249 

progress  of  Ofaristianily  more  by  his  iDfluonce  as  a  monk  than  as  a  temporal 
prince.    Dissensions  were  produced  among  the  people  by  the  hostility  some 
felt  against  the  Christian  faith,  and  finally  entered  even  the  ducal  palace. 
According  to  popular  tradition,  Ludmilla  was  put  to  death  by  her  own 
daughter-in-law,  and  Wenceslaus  by  his  brother.     Christianity,  however, 
having  passed  through  severe  persecutions,  obtained  a  sanguinary  triumph 
ander  Bolenlaus  the  Mild  (after  967),  and  with  the  establishment  of  the  arch- 
bishopric of  Prague  (078),  a  permanent  ecclesiastical  constitution  was  adopted. 
As  the  only  condition  on  which  that  see  could  be  procured  from  the  pope, 
the  Roman  ritual  was  also  then  introduced,  (r)     The  Wends^  who  resided  in 
the  country  between  the  Saalo  and  the  Oder,  and  were  divided  into  many 
tribes  under  as  many  princes,  being  assailed  by  the  Germans,  defended  them- 
selves with  extreme  difficulty.     Otho  I.  was  anxious  to  render  the  dominion 
he  had  acquired  over  them  by  the  sword  more  secure  by  the  baptism  of  the 
people,  and  hence  the  bishoprics  which  he  established  among  them  were 
intended  to  be  quite  as  much  the  citadels  of  his  own  power  as  the  castles  of 
the  Church.    Hence,  by  the  same  act  in  which  the  Wends  under  MUiewoi 
threw  off  from  their  necks  (983)  the  yoke  of  the  German  civil  power,  Chris- 
Hauity  was  also  cast  away.     Oottschalk,  his  grandson,  succeeded  in  uniting 
the  several  Wendic  tribes  into  a  single  kingdom  (1047),  and  was  successfully 
endeavoring  to  establish  a  national  Christian  Church,  when  he  was  assassina- 
ted m  the  midst  of  his  eflbrts  (1066).    The  people  then  consecrated  anew 
the  altars  of  their  ancestors  with  the  blood  of  Christian  priests,  and  every 
trace  of  Christianity  among  them  was  obliterated.    Pomerania  having  been 
conqnered  by  Boleslaus  III.^  Duke  of  Poland,  OthOy  Bishop  of  Bamhurg^  was 
invited  by  him  to  baptize  the  inhabitants.    This  work  was  finally  effected  by 
thatprekte  (1124, 1128),  {d)  and  other  tribes  were  likewise  overcome  and 
converted  by  the  Saxon  princes,  especially  by  Henry  the  Lion  (1142-62). 
The  desolated  country  became  settled  by  various  German  colonies,  until 
finally  only  a  few  miserable  remnants  of  the  ancient  people  preserved  the 
Vendic  language  and  customs,  and  the  whole  country  became  German  and 
Christian,  {e)    The  last  refuge  which  the  gods  and  the  liberty  of  the  Wends 
Iwd  found  in  Rugen^  was  burned  by  Ahsalon  (Axel),  Bishop  of  Roeskilde, 
the  statesman  and  the  hero  of  the  seas  (1168).  {f)    The  gospel  was  carried 
into  Poland  by  certain  persons  who  took  refuge  there  on  the  overthrow  of 
the  Moravian  kingdom,  and  on  the  marriage  of  Miecislaus^  Duke  of  Poland, 


c)  C(mM$,  Praff.  (died  1125.)  Chron.  Bohemor.  (Scriptt  rer.  Bobem.  Prag.  1784.  Th.  1.)  Vita  8. 
I^lttlllM.  (Dolner,  Abhandl.  d.  Bohm.  Gescli.  d.  Wise.  1786.  p.  417f«.)  Vita  8.  Lndm.  ot  8.  Wen- 
eeWiocL  ChriMianno  de  ScaUt  Mon.  (Acto  SS.  Sept  Tb.  V.  p.  854.  Th.  VII.  p.  825.)  F.  Pttlacky, 
®«*k.  ▼.  BObm.  Prag.  1886.  vol  L     Torntcaldt,  Adalb.  v.  Prag.  (Zeltach.  t  hl»t  Th.  1858.  II.  2.) 

<0  Devitab.  Otton.  1.  III.  {CanUii  Lectt  ed.  Bamage,  Tb.  III.  P.  II.)— {Sell)  Otto  v.  Bamb. 
^^  1792.    Bu9ch^  Meznoria  Othon.  Pomerani  ApostolL  Jon.  1824 

*)  I.  After  Wittichind,  ThlAtmar,  Adam  uf  Bremen  (§  170),  and  Saxo  Gramm.,  consult  Helmoldf 
^i*«flr»t  Bo»w  near  Labeck),  Cbron.  Slavorum  (till  1170),  ed.  Bangeri,  Lnb.  1659.  1702.  4.  {LUbnit 
^-  Bmnsu.  Th.  XL)— IL  Kanngi^sstr^  Bekehrungsgescb.  d.  Pommern.  Greifaw.  1824.  F.  W. 
*'***W,  (}«9ch.  V.  Pommern.  u.  Rugen.  Hamb.  1889.  vol  I.  L.  GiMebrecht^  wend.  Geacb.  v. 
^»8i  BerL  184a  8  vols. 

/)  MunUr,  vol.  IL  Abtb.  L  p.  820.  Abth.  XL  p.  78188.  StArup^  Abaalon.  from  the  Danish  by 
******  (Zeltschr.  t  hist  Th.  1882.  vol  IL  pt.  J.) 


250  MEDIAEVAL  CHUBCH  HISTORY.    PER  IIL    A.  D.  800-12161 

with  a  Bohemian  princess,  Christianity  became  the  religion  of  the  state  (966). 
By  liis  second  marriage  with  the  daughter  of  the  Margrave  Dietrich,  and  by 
its  dependence  upon  the  German  empire,  Poland  was  drawn  into  connections 
with  the  Roman  Church.-  Such  connections  being  cherished  with  special 
care,  the  Polish  churches  were  induced  to  pay  tribute  to  St.  Peter,  the  Slavic 
ritual  which  had  previously  been  used  in  them  was  gradually  abandoned,  and 
in  the  subsequent  political  commotions  of  the  nation  the  papal  power  was 
sometimes  very  great,  (g)  Long  after  this  period  the  people  were  accustomed 
to  celebrate  the  drowning  of  their  ancient  gods  with  lamentations  and  par- 
tial sorrow,  (h) 

§  226.     The  Hungarians. 

Schtcandtner,  Scir.  ror.  IXnng.  VInd.  1746.  C  Th.  L  F^ir,  Codex  diplomatlcnB  Hang.  eccL  «l 
civ.  Budae.  1829.  Tb.  I.— J.  v.  MaUath,  Qesch.  der  Magyaren.  Wien.  182S.  toL  L  [Godkin^  Hist 
of  H.  Lond.  1S54.] 

A  few  Hungarian  princes,  while  on  a  visit  to  Constantinople,  consented 
to  be  baptized,  tmd  their  country  was  filled  with  Christian  slaves  captured 
during  the  inroads  of  their  people  in  Germany.  By  these  means  Christianity 
had  obtained  a  foothold  in  the  country,  until  more  peaceable  relations  with 
Germany  were  established  by  the  victories  of  the  Saxon  emperors.  The  em- 
peror then  requested  the  bishops  Piligrin  of  Passau  and  Adalbert  of  Prague 
to  undertake  the  conversion  of  the  Hungarians.  Duke  Qeysa  (972-997), 
being  sufficiently  wealthy  and  powerful,  was  in  the  habit  not  only  of  build- 
ing Christian  churches,  but  of  offering  sacrifices  to  the  gods,  {a)  His  son 
Stephen  (907-1038)  brought  Hungary  into  the  political  community  of  dvil- 
ized  nations,  gave  to  the  Church  a  permanent  form  of  government  in  subjec- 
tion to  Rome,  and  with  the  consent  of  the  emperor  and  the  sanction  of  the 
pope,  assumed  the  royal  crown.  (5)  Surrounded  as  he  was  by  Christians  and 
Germans,  the  new  king  ventured  in  various  ways  to  curtail  the  ancient  privi- 
leges of  the  people.  In  the  political  commotions  which  occurred  during  the 
ten  years  immediately  following  his  death,  the  most  violent  efforts  were  pnt 
forth  to  re-establish  idolatry,  and  were  repelled  with  equal  violence. 

§  227.     The  Finns,  Livonians^  and  Esthonians. 

Eric  the  Saint^  King  of  Sweden,  effected  the  conquest  of  the  Finns 
(1157),  and  subjected  them  to  the  authority  of  his  own  crovni  and  of  tlie 
Church.  For  a  long  time,  however,  their  magicians  were  much  more  hon- 
ored than  their  clergy,  (a)  But  an  intercourse  had  already  been  commenced 
with  Livonia  by  the  German  maritime  cities.    MeinJuird,  a  canon  of  Bremen, 

ff)  I.  After  Thletmar  consult  Martini  OcMi  (about  1180X  Cbron.  Pol.  od.  BandtkU^  TanoY. 
1824.  Vincent  de  Kadlubek  (d  1226),  de  gestis  Pol.  {DIuqom,  Hist  Pol  LpA.  1711.  t  Th.  L>— 
IL  Ch.0.v.  Frieae,  KOosch.  d.  K.  Pohl.  BraL  1736.  vol  L  RdpM^  Oeach.  Pol  Hunb.  1840.  toI 
L  Append.  4.       1i)  OHmm,  deutsche  Mythol  p.  446& 

a)  ThUtmar  \.  VIII.    {Leihnit  p.  420.) 

h)  ChartvUiM,  (18tb  cent)  Vita  8.  StepbanL  {Sehteandtneri  Bcrr.  iw.  Hung.  Vind.  1741  £  pt 
414.)  Re9pectlng  tbo  story  of  tbe  Crown  adorned  with  Qreek  cbaraeter^  and  Uie  salutation  as  Bex 
Apoetolicus  and  Legate,  see  A.  F.  KoUar^  de  origg.  et  usu  perpetno  poteetatis  leglsL  drca  aacra  a^ 
Eegum  Hong.  Vlnd.  1764.    Jlordnyi,  de  s.  corona.  Hung.  Pesth.  1790. 

a)  Oertkhjalm  I  c  IV,  4.    JT&fM,  toL  L  p.  48as. 


CHAP.  VL    PROT.  PABTIEa    §228.    CATHARISTS.  251 

made  some  attempts  to  convert  its  inhabitants  (after  1186),  for  we  find  that 
he  assisted  them  to  build  fortresses  against  their  enemies,  and  was  consecra- 
ted to  the  bishopric  of  Yxkiill.  Proceeding  from  that  point,  the  bishops 
obtained  their  respective  dioceses  by  military  conquests,  in  the  course  of 
which  they  were  often  in  danger  of  losing  their  lives,  and  they  confirmed 
the  results  of  their  preaching  by  leading  the  Germans  in  miniature  crusades 
against  the  people.  The  bishopric  of  Riga  was  founded  by  Albert^  the  second 
in  succession  after  Meinhard,  and  the  ecclesiastical  subjugation  of  the  country 
was  finally  completed  by  the  weapons  of  an  order  of  knights  instituted  by 
him  (1202),  called  the  Brethren  of  the  Sward.  With  the  aid  of  this  order 
and  of  the  Danes,  the  Esthonians  were  also  subdued  and  converted  to  the 
faith  (after  1211).  The  ascendency  of  this  order  and  of  the  bishops  was 
afterwards  undisputed.  (J) 


CHAP.  VI.— PARTIES  PROTESTING  AGAINST  THE  OnUROH. 

C.du  PUssU  d^Arffentrf,  Col.  jtidiciornm  de  novis  error,  ab  initio  XII.  8.  usqne  ad  ann.  1632. 
Pit.  172S.  3  Th.  t  F&Mrien,  K.  u.  KeUcrhist  d.  mittlern  Zeit  Ft.  u.  Lpz.  ITTOaa.  8  voI&  Flathe, 
G«ch.  der  Vorlaafer  d.  Kef.  Lpz.  1S859.  2  toIs.     D,  Ilahn^  Qescb.  d.  Ketzcr.  ini  MA.  Stuttg. 

1^15^.  3  TulflL 

§  228.     The  Catharista, 

A  feeling  of  dissatisfaction  now  began  to  manifest  itself  on  the  part  of 
many  persons  on  account  of  the  extravagant  worldly  spirit  of  the  priest- 
bood,  and  the  religious  spirit  of  the  people  began  to  put  forth  a  strong  pro- 
test against  the  Church  itself.  Persons  of  this  tendency  were  at  first  burned 
(1022)  at  Orleans,  {a)  and  were  found  in  various  parts  of  Germany  (b)  and 
England,  but  the  great  body  of  them  inhabited  Lombardy  and  Provence,  (c) 
In  these  latter  countries  the  Troubadours  had  contributed  much  to  the  spirit 
of  independence  with  which  the  hierarchy  was  spoken  of  in  that  country, 
▼liile  in  Italy  the  Church  was  principally  regarded  as  a  political  power.  The 
emperor  had  no  interest  in  destroying  the  enemies  of  the  papacy,  and  the 
popes  were  obliged  frequently  to  regard  the  friendship  of  the  Lombards  aa 
of  more  importance  than  the  extermination  of  heretics.  Even  the  contest  to 
▼bich  Gregory  excited  the  laity  against  the  married  priests,  either  produced 


I)  Bmrici  LetH  (aboat  1226),  Orig{c.  LIvoniae  sacrae  et  civ.  «.  Cbron.  a  notls  J.  D.  Gruberi,  Fr. 
*tl{M.I74Q.  f.—Parrot^  Entwickl.  d.  Sprachc,  Abstamm.  Oesch.  MythoL  d.  LlwoDf  Letten,  E^tcn. 
StoUf.  \m.  2  Tola.  If.  A.  0.  de  Pott,  de  Gladlferis  8.  fratrib.  militiae  Chrbti.  Erl.  1S06.  Kurd  y. 
Se^iiter,  LivL  a.  d.  Anfange  deutM:hen  Lebens  im  baltiscben  Nord.  Brl.  1950. 

o)  Ademar^  a  monk  of  Angoul^me  abont  1209,  Chron.  {Baziqtiet  Tb.  X.  p.  154a&)  Oesta  Syn, 
^•rdLtn.  {Jiatud  Th.  XIX.  p.  8768».)  Glaber  Radulf.  Ill,  8. 

*)  llWon  tbe  Lower  Rbine :  ExervinU,  Praepoa.  Steinfeld.  Ep.  ad  Bernard-  {Argeniri  Th.  I.  p. 
*i)ll«l  JSekberti  Scrmm.  XIII.  adv.  Catharorum  errorea.  Col.  680.  (Blbl.  PP.  max.  Th.  XXIII. 

f)  Tbc  documents  arc  in  Hist  g6n6rale  de  Langnedoc  par  an  B^n6dictiD  de  S.  Manr.  Par.  1787. 
▼ol  III.  Polemical  writrrs  near  Uie  end  of  tbe  12tb  cent :  Ehrardi  Flandren^s  L  anlibaere«t& 
(Wi  Pp.  max.  Th.  XXIV.  p.  1525.)  Ermengardi  Opsc  c.  baereticoss  qui  diount  omnia  vMbilia 
*^  «K  a  I>eo  fSicta,  Bed  a  diabolo.  {Th.  p.  1602.)  Alani  de  Itunilis  L  IV.  c  haereticos  rai  temp. 
(The  hro  first  volai  in  Alani  0pp.  ed-  C,  de  ViseJi,  Antu.  1654.  t  The  two  last  in  C.  de  Viwh 
^  Scrr.  Cist  CoL  165<L  4)— C  Schmidt^  Hist  et  doctrine  des  Catbares  on  Albigeois.  Par.  1849. 2  vols. 


252  MEDIAEVAL  CHURCH  HISTOEY.    PER.  IIL    A.  D.  800-12161 

or  absorbed  elements  hostile  to  every  thing  connected  with  the  ecclesiastioal 
authorities  (Paterini).  (</)  The  name  of  CatharutSy  by  which  this  sect  was 
usually  designated,  shows  what  were  their  ordinary  pretensions.  A  similar 
opposition  prepared  the  way  for  the  influence  exercised  by  the  Paulicians 
who  had  been  transferred  into  the  western  countries  of  Europe  (hence  called 
Publicani,  Bugri).  The  accounts  we  have  respecting  them  are  almost  exclu- 
sively from  their  enemies,  or  from  apostates  from  them,  and  are  consequently 
full  of  errors  and  calumnies,  {e)  All  agree,  however,  in  describing  them  as 
universally  and  absolutely  opposed  to  the  Catholic  Church  and  all  its  pomp, 
in  consequence  of  what  they  professed  to  be  an  immediate  communication  of 
the  Holy  Ghost,  exalting  them  above  all  conscious  necessity  of  ecclesiastical 
or  civil  laws.  Their  opposition  to  every  thing  of  a  sensuous  nature  made 
them  practically  renounce  all  carnal  pleasures,  and  led  them  theoretically  to 
ascribe  the  whole  visible  universe  to  an  evil  cause  and  to  deny  the  real  hu- 
manity of  our  Redeemer.  This  dualistic  tendency,  however,  may  have  gone 
no  further  than  the  popular  notion  of  a  devil  and  his  subordinate  spirits,  and 
in  a  portion  of  the  Catharistic  Church  it  appears  to  have  beeii  modified  in 
various  ways,  to  have  been  full  of  moral  seriousness  and  religious  sincerity, 
and  yet  to  have  laid  great  stress  upon  fastings,  genuflexions,  and  Latin  forms 
of  prayer.  (/)  Scriptural  preaching  and  the  gospels  were  held  in  much 
esteem,  but  various  opinions  prevailed  among  them  respecting  the  prophets. 
The  baptism  of  the  Spirit  (consolamentum)  was  substituted  for  baptism  by 
water,  and  was  administered  by  the  imposition  of  the  hands  of  all  persons 
present  who  had  themselves  received  it.  In  this  ordinance  only  perfect 
Christians  (bos  homes,  boni  homines)  received  their  consecration,  for  the 
duties  which  it  imposed  were  so  rigid  that  most  persons  remained  catechu- 
mens (credentes,  of  two  different  degrees),  and  did  not  receive  the  consola- 
mentum, whi(Jh  they  regarded  as  necessary  to  salvation,  until  their  dying 
hour.  The  dualistic  view,  however,  could  consistently  forbid  nothing  but 
marriage  and  the  eating  of  flesh.  In  the  midst  of  a  people  thus  professing 
to  be  filled  with  the  Spirit,  and  whose  pope  was  the  Holy  Ghost  himself,  none 
of  the  existing  officers  of  the  Church  could  exercise  any  of  their  hierarchi- 
cal prerogatives.  The  prohibitions  contained  in  the  Sermon  on  the  Mount 
were  accepted  in  their  most  literal  and  painful  sense,  and  those  who  went  to 
a  dualistic  extreme  resolved  the  ordinary  doctrines  of  the  Church,  and  even  all 
historical  Christianity,  into  mere  allegories  illustrative  of  the  Christian's  inner 
life.  On  the  other  hand,  the  Pa%agii  of  Lombardy  maintained  the  absolute 
authority  of  the  Old  Testament  in  opposition  to  the  Manicheans  who  rejected 


d)  Slgeberi,  Gerhblac.  ad  ann.  1074. 

e)  Bonacortiy  ono  of  those  tencbers  who  returned  to  the  Cath.  Charch,  about  1190,  Vita  haereti- 
cor.  8.  inanife!«tatio  haervsis  Catharor.  {IXAchery^  Spicil  Tb.  L  p.  20S.  Supplements  m  BhIhmU 
Miscell.  cd.  ManH  Th.  II.  p.  581.)  J.  Moneta^  Duniinican,  aboiit  1240.  adv.  Cath.  et  Waldensea,  ad. 
Bicchini^  Rom.  1743.  f.  liaineriiis  Sacchoni\  once  a  chief  of  the  sect,  but  afterwards  a  Dominican 
and  Inquisitor,  1250.  Snmma  de  Catbaris  ot  Leonistls.  (ifarten^  Thes.  nov.  Anecd.  Th.  V.  p.  1759. and 
Arffentri  Th.  I.  p.  48.  (The  edit  by  Greiner  is  no  ftirther  the  actual  work  of  Rainerius,  but  a  later 
collection  made  by  some  German.  Gianeler,  do  Rainerli  Sacch.  Summa.  Oott  ISM,  4)  [C  Sckmidt^ 
nist  et  doct  de  la  eecte  des  Catlian-?,  etc.  Par.  1849.  2  voK  Stud.  u.  Krit  1850.  IT.  4.] 

/)  Thus  according  to  an  orig.  doc  :  £in  Katharlachee  Ritnale,  ed.  by  £1  Kunttt,  Jen.  1899L 


CHAP.  VI.  PHOT.  PARTIES.  §  228.  PASAGII.  g  229.  PETEB  OF  BRUT8.   253 

it,  and  the  Ebionite  and  Arian  doctrines  concerning  Christ  in  opposition  to 
the  vieivs  of  the  Docetae.  (g)  The  name  of  this  sect,  as  well  as  the  time  in 
which  it  sprung  up,  suggests  that  this  revival  of  Jewish  Christianity  may  have 
been  occasioned  by  the  conquest  of  Jerusalem,  (h)  The  ecclesiastical  rulers 
were  at  first  very  lenient  toward  these  various  sects,  but  they  were  soon  com- 
pelled to  resort  to  the  severest  punishments.  Even  then  they  could  not  pre- 
vent multitudes  from  embracing  these  doctrines  in  secret,  and  barely  suc- 
ceeded in  escaping  from  a  general  and  public  defeat.  Some  who  urged  that, 
according  to  the  teaching  of  Christ  and  the  example  of  St.  Martin,  such  un- 
fortunate persons  ought  to  receive  instruction  rather  than  hanging,  could 
gain  no  attention.  (/) 

§  229.     Peter  of  Bniys  and  Ilenry,     Tanchelm  and  Eon, 

In  the  course  of  the  opposition  which  sprung  up  against  the  Church  in 
the  twelfth  century,  a  few  individuals  became  prominent  either  as  advocates 
or  leaders  of  sects.    Peter  de  Bruys^  who  had  been  deposed  from  the  priest- 
hood, but  preached  (after  1104)  in  the  south  of  France,  was  one  of  these. 
He  declaimed  against  the  baptism  of  infants,  the  mass,  and  celibacy,  burned 
the  cross  which  had  been  the  instrument  of  our  Lord's  passion,  and  called 
Tipon  his  hearers  to  destroy  the  churches,  since  God  was  as  willing  to  hear 
prayer  offered  to  him  in  an  inn  or  a  stable  as  from  before  an  altar.    Many 
disturbances  of  a  violent  nature  were  created  by  him,  but  he  was  finally 
hnmed  by  a  mob  at  St.  Gilles  (1124).  (a)    Henry ^  a  monk  who  had  with- 
drawn from  his  order,  and  was  sometimes  thought  to  be  a  pupil  of  Peter  de 
Brays,  labored  in  the  same  region  of  country  (1116-48),  and  was  at  first 
highly  honored  even  by  the  clergy.     He  was  a  strenuous  preacher  of  repent- 
Mce,  and  though  not  opposed  to  ecclesiastical  authority,  held  up  the  corrup- 
tions of  the  clergy  to  the  derision  of  the  people.    He  was  finally  overcome 
hy  his  powerful  opponent,  and  ended  his  days  in  prison.  {Ji)    Tanchelm  (about 
1115),  who  resided  on  the  sea-coast  of  the  Netherlands,  preached  zealously 
Against  ecclesiastical  organizations,  collected  around  himself  an  armed  train  of 
followers,  claimed  to  be  God  equal  to  Christ  on  account  of  the  Holy  Ghost  which 
lie  professed  to  have  received,  held  public  celebrations  in  honor  of  his  espou- 
sal to  the  Virgin  Mary,  and  was  finally  slain  (about  1124)  by  a  priest,  (c) 
-S^n  (Eudo  de  Stella)  proclaimed  that  he  had  been  sent  into  the  world  to  be 
the  judge  of  the  living  and  the  dead.    He  made  his  appearance  sometimes  in 
one  and  sometimes  in  another  place  in  difterent  parts  of  France,  attended  by 

C)  BoMcorn  in  IXAchery^  p.  211ss.  O.  Bergomensis  c  Cath.  et  Pasagios  c  a.  1230.  (Jfuratori 
Antiqq.  luL  Med.  aevi.  vol  V.  p.  152as.)  [C.  U.  JIahn,  Gesch.  d.  Kctzer  im  MA.  bes.  Im  11.  12.  u. 
'*"Mrh.  StuUg.  185a  8  vols.] 

*)  Compi  I/fcher^  Sef.  Acta.  vol.  L  p.  857.    On  the  other  hand :   Baumg.  Crusius,  Comp.  d. 

*)  Bennanni  Conir.  Chron.  ad.  ann.  1052.  Gesta  Eplscc.  Leodiens.  c.  60.  60a.  {Martene,  ampllss. 

0)  Pe^  Ventr.  Ep.  adv.  Pctwhrussianofl  haer.  (Blbl.  PP.  max.  Tb.  XXII.  p.  102888. 

h  Acta  EpiBc.  Ccnomancnslum  c  358.  {JlabiUon  vott  Analecta.  Th.  III.)  Bernardi  Vita  scr. 
^«^.  Ill,  «. 

^  Ep.  Tr^ectenito  Ec?.  ad  Frid.  Archlep.  Colon.  (ArgerUri  Tb.  I.  p.  IIsbl)    Abatlardi  Intr.  ad 
"*•■  (Opp.  ^  low.)  ViU  Xorbsrti,  §  8«.  (AcU  83.  Jun.  Th.  L  p.  84&) 


254  MEDIAEVAL  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  IIL    A.  D.  800-121«. 

a  bold  retinne,  and  living  in  so  samptuous  a  style  on  the  wealth  of  the 
churches  and  monasteries,  that  the  people  generally  believed  him  to  be  a  ma- 
gician. He  was  at  last  taken  by  surprise,  arraigned  before  a  Synod  at 
Bheims  (1148),  and  without  despairing  of  the  success  of  his  cause,  died  in 
the  prison  of  St.  Denys.  {d) 

§  230.     The  Waldenses. 

I.  MemoriiUs  of  the  Wald.  Manuscripts  in  Geneva  and  Dublin,  generally  affected  hy  later  I'rotcs- 
tant  influences  (comp.  Diockhoff,  modifled  by  Herzog),  especially  with  respect  to  times  before  Host: 
(^ntica,  described  by  Ileitog^  p.  72:91  and  la  nobla  Leyczon  in  Raynouard^  Cboix  des  po^es 
orig.  des  Troubad.  Par.  1818.  vol.  II.  p.  78sb.  According  to  the  Geneva  and  Dublin  text  in  Ueraog^ 
p.  444ns.  Kath.  Verdicts  and  Prutucols  of  the  Inquisition  in  Argentri^  (CoL  J  ad.  vol.  I.  p.  Tits.) 
and  Ph.  a  Limhurch^  Hist.  Inqtiisit.  in  the  conclusion  mentioned  as  L.  sententt.  Inquis.  Tolosanae. 
Catharistic  accounts  and  polctn.  Mrriting^:  BemarduH^  Abbas  Fontis  calidi  (d.  before  1200)  adv.  Val- 
densium  sectain.  (Ribl.  PP.  max.  vol  XXIV.  p.  1&S5.)  Alanvs  de  InwlU  (d.  1202),  c  Ilaeretic 
L  II.  (0pp.  ed.  K.  V.  VUctu,  Antu.  IdM.)  Walther  Mapes  in  //oAn,  vol.  IL  pi  2578.  St^phanus  d§ 
Borhone  (about  1250),  do  septem  donis  Sp.  S.  VII,  81.  {Argentri  vol  L  p.  6569.)  Haineriui.  Mo- 
neta  (§  228.  n.  <•.) 

IL  GilUs,  nij*t  ccc.  das  vgl.  reform6e8  en  quelques  vall^s  do  Pi6monL  Gen.  1644.  J.  Lfg^r^ 
Hist  gen.  de^  ^^1.  evan?.  des  valleos  dc  Piem.  ou  Vaudoises.  Leid.  1669.  2  vols,  t  Uebers.  v.  Sckw*^ 
nitz,  Lpz.  1750.  2  vols.  4.  {J.  Brez)  Hist  doe  Vaud.  Laus.  1796.  2  voK  Lpz.  179a  A.  JfonatOer^ 
Hist  d\''g1.  Vaudoi^e.  Gen.  1847.  2  vols.  A.  Mutton^  Tlsrael  des  Alpes,  prem.  Hist  complete  dea 
Vaud.  Par.  1851.  4  vols.— //r/An  (see  before  §  22a)  vol  II.  comp.  Preface  to  vol.  III.  p.  X.  F.  Ben- 
der, Geach.  d.  W.  Ulm.  1S50.— ^.  W.  Dieckhoff,  d-  W.  iin  MAlter.  Gott  1851.  ITertog,  d.  roman. 
W.  ihrc  vorref.  Zustando  u.  Lchren,  ihro  Re£  im  16.  Jbh.  n.  d.  R&ckwirk.  drs.  Hal  1853.  [/Vy- 
ran^  Hist  Defence  of  the  Wald.  Lond.  6vo.  E.  Il^nderton,  Origin,  Ac,  of  the  Vaudois.  W.  & 
GiUy,  The  Albigenses  in  LittelPs  Rel  Mag.  vol  I.  p.  6.  A.  Monastier,  IWA.  of  the  Vaodob 
Church  ft-om  its  Origin.  New  York.  1849.  12mo.  Robt  Baird,  Waldensea,  Alblg.  and  Vaud.  Pbilad. 
1848.  8vo.  C.  U.  /lahn,  Gesch.  d.  Ketzer  ira  Mittelalter,  bes.  im  11. 12.  und  la  Jahrh.  Stuttg.  1&47.  C. 
U.  ITahn,  in  Stud.  u.  Krit  1851.  II.  4.  p.  8C2.  Herzog^  d.  Waldenser,  vor  u.  nach  d.  BeC  Lpsi  1858. 18.] 

The  dissatisfaction  and  ferments  which  prevailed  during  the  twelfth  c^n- 
tnry,  gave  occasion  during  the  last  half  of  it  to  the  appearance  of  the  Wal- 
densea. As  they  were  generally  conversant  with  the  Scriptures,  they  main- 
tained in  opposition  to  unworthy  priests,  that  all  who  truly  imitated  Christ 
in  his  life  of  poverty,  had  a  right  freely  to  preach  the  gospel.  As  the  natu- 
ral result  of  their  demand  that  Christians  should  live  in  complete  poverty 
and  virginity,  a  distinction  was  formed  soon  after  the  excitement  of  their 
origin  had  subsided,  between  the  Perfect,  who  forsook  all  and  went  forth 
two  by  two  in  their  sandals  preaching  repentance,  and  the  mere  Believers, 
who  forsook  the  pleasures  of  the  world,  but  who  continued  in  the  enjoyments 
of  conjugal  and  social  life.  Witnesses  whose  testimony  is  beyond  suspicion, 
though  they  belonged  to  the  Catholic  Church,  inform  us  that  their  name  and 
origin  is  to  be  traced  to  (Peter)  Waldvs,  an  opulent  citizen  of  Lyons,  who 
was  transported  by  his  own  ideal  of  evangelical  perfection,  had  the  gospels 
and  many  sentiments  of  the  ecclesiastical  fathers  which  harmonized  with 
them  transbted  into  the  Romanic  vernacular  language,  gave  all  his  poeses- 
sions  to  the  poor,  and  from  a  desire  to  attain  a  state  like  that  found  in  the 
apostolic  Church,  went  forth  (about  1160)  as  a  preacher  of  repentance.  The 
tradition  more  recently  entertained  among  the  Waldenses  themselves,  accord- 
ing to  which  their  origin  is  to  be  traced  to  primitive  and  even  to  apostolio 


d)  Wilhelm  KevhHgens  de  reb.  Angl  1, 19.  {ArgerUri  Th.  L  p.  86as.)    Otto  FrU.  de  gest  Frid. 
1, 54ai    AlborUA  Chron.  ad  ana.  114a  1149. 


CHAP.  VL    PROT.  PARTIES.    S  28a  WALDENSE8.    g  281.  ALBIGENSES.       255 

0 

times,  is  trae  only  so  far  as  the  same  spirit  has  always  been  sustained  among 
tbem  by  the  sacred  Scriptures,  and  has  always  protested  against  the  corrup- 
tions of  the  Ghnrch.    It  is  also  probable  that  in  some  of  their  Alpine  val- 
leys a  spirit  has  been  maintained  ever  since  the  time  of  Claudius  of  Turin, 
which  harmonized  with  and  was  best  defined  by  the  preaching  of  the  Wal- 
denses.    These  Poar  People  of  Lyons  (Leonistae,  Humiliati,  Sabatati)  had  no 
idea  of  breaking  away  from  the  Church,  and  when  their  archbishop  com- 
manded them  to  be  silent,  they  turned  with  the  utmost  confidence  to  Alex- 
ander m.  (11T9),  who  treated  them  with  scorn.    Their  doctrine  that  lajTnen 
might  teach  the  people  necessarily  brought  them  into  collision  with  the 
clergy,  and  they  were  soon  (1184)  excommunicated  by  Lucius  III.    But  obey- 
ing God  rather  than  men,  they  established  congregations  in  France,  Italy, 
tad  (Germany,  and  had  their  principal  residences  in  Provence  and  in  the 
lofty  valleys  of  Piedmont.     Although  they  differed  from  the  Catholic  Church 
not  80  mnch  in  their  doctrines  as  in  their  manner  of  life,  which  was  strictly 
ooDformed  to  the  letter  of  Christ^s  sermon  on  the  mount,  they  were  con- 
strained to  deny  that  the  Church ^f  the  pope  was  the  Church  of  Christ,  even 
when  they  allowed  that  many  had  been  saved  who  had  never  forsaken  it. 
Their  moral  convictions  were  strongly  against  the  doctrine  of  a  purgatory, 
with  all  its  auxiliary  additions;  they  required  a  confession  of  all  sins,  but 
expected  fbr^veness  from  Qod  alone,  and  they  honored  the  saints  as  models 
of  piety,  but  not  as  intercessors  before  God.    Wherever  their  congregations 
were  properly  organized,  their  Masters  or  Barbs,  chosen  from  among  the  Per- 
fect, preached,  heard  confessions,  and  in  cases  of  necessity  administered  the 
aacnments.    Innocent  III.  at  one  time  indulged  the  hope  that  he  could  bring 
their  evangelical  poverty  under  the  control  of  monastic  vows  (pauperes  catho- 
lici),  bat  the  fortunes  of  this  sect  soon  became  involved  with  those  of  the 
Githariflts,  and  it  was  said  that  even  if  the  faces  of  these  heretics  were  dif- 
ferent, their  tails  were  all  twisted  together.    They  frequently  lived  concealed 
ia  the  midst  of  the  Catholic  Church,  recognizing  each  other  by  secret  signs, 
ttd  wherever  they  were  they  always  formed  a  light  amidst  surrounding  dark- 
new,  were  active  in  promoting  evangelical  virtues  and  familiarity  with  the 
Scriptures,  and  always  stood  ready  to  aid  with  the  power  of  a  Scriptural 
Christianity  every  higher  development  of  man^s  moral  nature. 

§  281.     The  AlUgensian  War. 

t  PtM.  Mon4ichi  (de  Yanx  Cemay)  Illst  Albigenslnm.  Guil.  de  Podlo  LaurenUi  (Cliaplain  to 
^*imaA  VII.)  aaper  Hist,  negotll  Francor.  adv.  Alblg.  (Both  found  In  Bouquet-Brial  Th.  XIX.) 
Hfat  4e  la  rrol9«de  contre  lea  her6tlqaos  Albi^eola,  6crlto  en  vera  provrnraax,  pnbl.  par  if.  C.  Fau- 
'H  Pv.  15S7.  4.  nist  de  la  guerre  dea  Alblg.  (Together  with  other  documents  in  tlie  Hist  de  Lan- 
n«i-Th.  III.  Preuvea.)    J.  du  TlUet,  Hlat  belli  c.  Alb.  Inltl  comp.  ex  Bibl.  Vat.  ed.  A.  Dre^ 

IL  Sltmonde  di  SUmondi,  lea  crolAades  contre  lea  Alblg.  Par.  1829L  [transl.  into  Engl.  Lond. 
^^Ta]  J.  J.  Barrau  et  A.  R  Darragon,  Hist  dea  croia  c  lea  Alb.  Par.  1848.  C.  Schmidt, 
B88,ootee.) 

The  Catharists  and  Waldenses  having  become  in  some  parts  of  Provence 
"'^^  powerful  than  the  Church  itself,  their  example  was  exceedingly  danger- 
^  Complete  authority  was  therefore  bestowed  by  Innocent  III.  for  the 
"iPpreBBion  of  these  heretics.    Eis  legates  travelled  about  barefoot  in  the 


256  MEDI/IETAL  CUURCH  HISTOBY.    PER  IIL    A.  D.  800-1916l 

manner  of  the  npostles,  sometimes  preaching  and  disputing,  and  sometimes 
getting  up  judicial  proceedings  and  popular  acts  of  violence.  Peter  of  Cai- 
telnay,  one  of  these  legates,  in  order  to  accomplish  his  object,  seized  upon 
those  powers  which  belonged  exclusively  to  the  civil  magistrate,  and  thna 
became  embroiled  in  a  quarrel  with  Count  Raymond  VI,  of  Toulouse,  one 
of  the  most  powerful  princes  of  the  country.  The  result  was  that  the  legate 
was  assassinated,  and  the  guilt  of  the  deed  was  imputed  to  the  Count  him- 
self. Innocent  then  proclaimed  a  crusade  against  him  and  all  other  heretics;, 
under  the  conduct  of  Arnold^  Abbot  of  Citeaux,  as  legate,  and  of  Simon  de 
Mont  fort.  Raymond  endeavored  to  escape  the  danger  by  humbling  himself 
and  taking  the  cross  against  his  own  people.  The  arms  of  the  crusaders  were 
now  turned  against  Raymond  Roger ^  Viscount  of  Beziers  and  Albi,  and 
hence  the  heretics,  and  especially  the  Catharists,  against  whom  this  crusade 
was  principally  directed,  were  generally  called  Alhigenses,  (a)  Beziers  was 
taken  by  storm,  and  the  legate  boasted,  that  as  a  messenger  of  divine  wrath, 
he  had  utterly  destroyed  the  city,  (b)  Montfort  now  turned  the  fury  of  hia 
excited  followers  against  the  territories  of  ^le  Count  of  Toulouse,  and  when 
he  had  conquered  them  he  was  recognized  at  the  Synods  of  Montpellier  and 
the  Lateran  (1215)  as  the  lawful  lord  of  all  that  he  had  thus  acquired,  (c) 
Innocent  perceived  the  impolicy  of  this  proceeding,  but  lest  he  should  lose 
the  great  object  at  which  he  was  aiming,  he  did  not  venture  to  rend  the  prey 
from  the  possession  of  the  tigers  whom  he  had  let  loose,  (d) 


CHAP.  VII.— THE  ORIENTAL  CUURCH. 

§  232.     Extension  of  th^  Church, 

The  Bulgarians,  originally  of  Turkish  extraction,  but  after  their  settle- 
ment in  Moesia  very  extensively  blended  with  the  Slaves,  were  for  a  long 
time  the  most  formidable  of  all  the  neighbors  witlj  whom  the  Greek  empire 
was  obliged  to  contend.  For  a  considerable  period  they  scornfully  rejected 
a  system  of  faith  proposed  to  them  by  their  enemies.  Christianity,  however, 
was  gradually  introduced  among  them  at  various  epochs  (845-865) ;  once  when 
the  daughter  of  their  prince  returned  from  captivity  among  tlie  Greeks,  then 
when  in  time  of  famine  they  made  supplication  to  the  God  of  Christians  and 
were  delivered,  and  finally,  under  the  influence  of  Metlwdius^  who  is  reported 
to  have  exerted  his  talents  among  them  not  only  as  an  apostle  but  as  a  paint- 
er, (a)  That  portion  of  the  Bulgarians  who  resided  on  the  Volga  were  cox/- 
verted  to  Mohammedanism,  and  the  kindred  tribe  of  the  Ghazars^  who  re- 
sided in  the  Chersonese,  was  divided  between  Mohammedanism,  Judaism,  and 
Christianity,  {h)    The  Mainots,  who  inhabited  the  rocky  caverns  of  the  Tay- 

a)  P.  JaSy  do  Valdensinm  sccta  ab  Albleena.  bene  distingaenda.  L.  B.  1S34.  4. 
h)  Caesar  IleUUrhae.  V,  21.    Innoc  1.  XII.  Ep.  108. 

c)  Manti  Th.  XXII.  p.  1069. 

d)  I/urter,  Innoc  voL  II.  p.  657aa. 

a)  Constantini  Porphyr.  ConUnuator  /T,  13s8.    Klatas  Davids  Ignat.  {^Marui  Th.  XVL  p. 
245.)    Comp.  §  225. 

I)  Frdhn,  Ibn-Fo6BlAD'8  and  andrer  A.raber  Berlchte  CL  d.  BoBBen  Ut  Zeit  Petenbi  18S8L  4.  Prt- 


CHAP.  TIL    ORIENT.  CnURCH.    $  282.  RUSSIANS.    S  228.  ROMAN  EMPIRE.     257 

getos,  continued  to  rcsbt  the  efforts  of  the  Church  until  the  latter  half  of 
the  ninth  century,  when  they  also  yielded  subjection  to  it.    About  the  same 
time  the  Slaten^  who  at  ditlcrent  periods  liad  broken  into  the  territory  of 
ancient  Greece,  became  Christians,  and  were  connected  with  the  Greek 
Church,  (r)     The  Russlunif  became  acquainted  with  Christianity  on  the  bat- 
tle-field.   Traditionary  accounts  tell  us  of  the  extraordinary  success  of  some 
effort.^  to  convert  them  durin«^  the  ninth  century,  but  no  traces  of  the  results 
i^pear  in  subsequent  ages.     Photius  proclaimed  that  they  were  enthusiastio 
in  their  desires  for  the  gospel,  but  the  event  proved  that  his  announcement 
Wft9  premature.     Oi^a^  their  excellent  dowager  princess,  procured  baptism 
for  herself  in  Constantinople  (955),  bnt  even  to  the  close  of  her  life  she  could 
enjoy  the  services  of  a  Christian  priest  only  in  secret.    Her  grandson  Vladi- 
mir^ after  a  careful  investigation  of  the  different  forms  of  religion  then  preva- 
lent, received  baptism  from  the  Greeks  (988).    The  people  beheld  with  tears 
the  abase  which  was  heaped  upon  their  ancient  gods,  and  submitted  them- 
selves  silently  to  baptism  in  the  river  Dnieper.    A  metropolitanate  under  the 
jurisdiction  of  the  Greek  Patriarch  was  established  in  Kiew^  then  the  capital 
of  the  empire.    A  convent  (Petsohera)  established  in  a  cave  near  Kiew,  be- 
came, after  the  middle  of  the  eleventh  century,  the  seminary  from  which  the 
whole  country  was  supplied  not  only  with  bishops  and  saints,  whose  bodies 
oerer  decayed,  but  with  a  Russian  literature,  (d) 

§  283.     The  Roman  Empire  and  the  Church. 

The  Roman  Empire  in  the  East,  continually  pressed  more  and  more  by 
the  power  of  the  Turks,  the  Normans,  and  the  Crusaders,  maintained  its 
ooQrage  by  the  proud  recollections  of  its  former  greatness,  and  its  existence 
nierely  in  consequence  of  the  fortunate  position  of  its  capital.  The  mechan- 
iun  which  prevailed  in  the  secular  and  spiritual  administrations  then  united 
in  the  head  of  the  imperial  government,  generally  continued  unaffected  by 
the  revolutions  which  so  frequently  took  place  in  the  palace.  The  spirit  of 
the  Church  sympathized  with  the  universal  torpidity,  and  orthodoxy  took 
the  place  which  belonged  to  morality  and  religion.  The  patriarchs  of  Con- 
■tantinople  perpetrated  and  endured  all  those  acts  of  violence  which  the 
^hest  civil  officers  are  accustomed  to  inflict  and  receive  where  feeble  despot- 
^  prevail.  A  party  of  the  clergy  was  kept  under  restraint  by  another 
F*rty  in  the  army.  The  enthusiasm  of  the  crusaders  met  with  no  response 
^  except  ridicule  and  suspicion.  The  number  and  power  of  these  sacred 
warriors  was  such  that  Constantinople  finally  became  a  mere  colony  of  the 


^  J.  t,  KlaprotK,  Beschr.  d.  rasa.  Prov.  zw.  d.  kasp.  u.  Schwarz  Meere.  Berl.  1814.  p-.  lldssi. 

0  U  Quien^  Oriens  ehr.  Tb.  IL  p.  lOSaiw  FaUm^rayer^  Qesch.  d.  llalbins.  Morea  wahrend  dcs 
^•>*Walt  Stuttg.  a.  Tub.  1880.  toI.  I.  p.  173s8.  216^  227ai.  The  Btatemcnts  ami  Rptrll  of  thte  work 
^'^W  be  eorrectod  by  a  porosal  of  Zinkeisen,  Gesch.  GrIechenL  Lpz,  1S82.  vol.  I.  p.  TWaa.  7678. 

^  yfdor  ((lie<l  abont  1118),  Annals  (till  1110.  Pctcr?b.  176788.  5  Th.  4.)  m.  Uebera.  tl  Anm.  (till 
^•*i!mlT)by  S'hidter,  Gott  1302m.  5  ro\A.—Karamsin,  Ocscb.  d.  rnsi  Kelchs.  Uebora.  by  Ifauen- 
•^  Rig.  isaoss.  vol.  L  II.    Strahl,  Qeach.  d.  ruaat  Klrcho.  UaL  1880.  vol.  L 

17 


258  MEDIAEVAL  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  IIL    A.  D.  800-121fli 

Western  nations,  and  what  remained  of  the  Grecian  Empire,  with  oil  on 
which  its  hopes  conld  rest,  was  transferred  to  Trebizond. 

§  234.      Photius, 

Photii  Epp.  ed.  Afontacutius,  Lond.  1651.  t  Origloal  docaments  in  JfunH  Th.  XV.  XVI.  YlUt 
a  cerumen  8.  Ignatii,  hj  Niceta*  David.  (XfanH  Th.  XVI.  p.  809.)  Ana»ta9ii  BibL  Prae£  ad 
Cona  VIII.  oec  (3fitn»i  Tli.  XVI.  p.  1m.)  ^usd.  Vita  Nicholal  I.  Vita  Hadrianl  II.— JSl  R  iSim/iv, 
do  dlsbldio  Ecc  chr.  iti  gr.  et  lat  PhoUl  aact  maturato.  L.  B.  ISaa  [O,  Finiajf,  H.  (>f  the  Byzan- 
tine Empire.  Lond  1S58.  8.] 

The  real  ruler  of  the  emperor  and  the  empire  was  Banlas^  the  nncle  of 
Michael  III.  The  Patriarch  Ignatius^  a  ennuch  of  the  dethroned  imperial 
family,  zealously  protested  against  the  arbitrary  conduct  of  Bardas  and  the 
immoralities  of  the  emperor,  in  whose  drinking  revels  the  sacred  rites  of  the 
Church  were  caricatured.  To  get  rid  of  him,  Photivs^  through  the  influence 
of  the  court,  was  elevated  to  the  patriarchal  oflSoe  (858).  This  man  had 
passed  through  the  highest  offices  of  the  state,  and  was  possessed  of  much 
diversified  learning.  By  his  promotion  to  that  office  a  schism  was  created  in 
the  Church,  which  the  court  attempted  to  heal  by  means  of  the  Roman 
bishop.  Legates  were  sent  to  Constantinople  by  Nicholcu  /.,  but  they  were 
soon  won  over  to  the  party  of  Bardas,  and  gave  sentence  against  Ignatius 
(861).  Nicholas,  however,  annulled  their  decisions,  and  rejected  Photius  as 
an  intruding  layman  (863).  This  disagreement  became  still  more  serioos 
when  the  Bulgarians  were  drawn  into  ecclesiastical  connection  with  the 
Church  of  Rome.  («)  A  circular  was  then  sent  forth  by  Photius,  severely 
censuring  as  heresies  all  those  usages  in  which  the  Roman  differed  from  the 
Greek  Church.  Among  the  heresies  enumerated  were  the  observation  of 
fasts  on  Saturday,  the  curtailment  of  the  great  fasts,  the  contempt  of  con- 
firmation when  performed  by  the  hand  of  a  presbyter,  and  the  ])rohibition 
of  the  lawful  marriage  of  priests.  To  these  charges  was  added  the  bitter 
re[)roach  that  the  Roman  Church  had  sinned  against  the  Holy  Ghost  by  cor- 
rupting the  Apostles'  Creed,  (h)  For,  the  doctrine  of  the  procession  of  the 
Holy  Ghost  (§  105)  from  the  Son  as  well  as  from  the  Father,  though  it  had 
been  maintained  as  truth  by  Leo  III.,  had  been  disapproved  as  an  addition  to 
the  Creed,  (r)  and  yet  had  finally  found  admission  into  the  Latin  version  of 
tlat  symbol.  At  a  synod  convened  by  Photius  in  Constantinople  (867),  the 
pope  was  excommunicated  and  deposed.  During  the  same  year,  however, 
Basil  became  sole  ruler  in  the  empire  by  the  murder  of  Michael,  with  whom 
he  had  before  been  associated  in  authority,  and  for  this  bloody  crime  the 
imperial  murderer  was  debarred  by  Photius  from  the  eommnnion  of  the 
Church.  With  calm,  lofty  dignity,  the  Patriarch  stood  before  his  judges, 
and  was  condemned  in  the  Synod  of  Constantinople  (869),  which  claimed  to 
be  Qicumonical.  (d)  By  the  same  assembly  Ignatius  was  restored  to  the  pa- 
triarchal office,  and  sought  to  regain  his  former  friendship  with  Rome,  but 


a)  Comp.  Gfrorer^  Carolingcr.  vol  I.  p.  439.  449as. 
h)  £p.  2.  Montaciit  p.  47s>& 

c)  Miui«i  Th.  XIV.  \u  ITss.    Anaat  Vita  Leon.  Ill,  (JTunitort  Th.  IIL  P.  L  pw  80a) 

d)  Man9t  TK  XVL  p.  122s^  87188. 


CHAP.  VII    ORIENT.  CHURCH.    {  «".  PHOTIUa    %  28».  SCHISM.  259 

the  dispute  respecting  the  Bulgarians,  whom  one  in  his  position  could  not 
honorably  surrender,  soon  produced  a  renewed  .occasion  for  strife.  On  the 
death  of  Ignatios  (878),  the  emperor  became  reconciled  to  Photius,  and  John 
VIIL,  hoping  to  effect  a  favorable  compromise  of  his  difficulties,  recognized 
the  claims  of  the  restored  patriarch.  At  the  Synod  of  Comtantinople  (879), 
which  is  regarded  by  the  Greek  Church  as  the  eighth  oecumenical  council, 
and  was  attended  by  Roman  deputies,  all  decrees  which  had  been  issued 
agunst  Photios  were  annulled^  ie)  The  pope,  however,  soon  found  that  he 
had  been  deceived  in  his  expectations,  and  pronounced  sentence  of  excom- 
munication against  the  patriarch  and  his  synod.  Photius  was  also  hated  by 
the  heir- apparent  to  the  throne,  who  had  no  sooner  assumed  the  imperial 
crown  under  the  name  of  Leo  the  Wise  (886),  than  he  was  sent  to  a  convent, 
where  he  found  his  grave  (about  891). 

§  236.     The  Division  of  the  Church, 

Lto  AUalin^y  de  Ece.  oec  et  or.  perpetna  consenA.  Col  1648.  4.  Afaimhourg^  Hl»t  da  schisme 
des  Qreci.  Par.  1677.  4.  and  otbcra.  C.  A.  v.  BeichUti-Meldegg^  d.  IJrsacbcn  d.  Trennnng^  (TheoL 
Abbh.  Grelz.  1'^.) 

The  previous  relations  of  the  Oriental  to  the  Roman  Church  were  never 
agun  re-established  in  a  definite  form.  The  Circular  which  had  been  issued 
by  Photius  has  ever  since  continued  a  perpetual  monument,  in  which  the 
tctoal  differences  between  the  two  churches  are  exhibited  in  their  most  ob- 
noxious fornu  The  political  separation  of  Italy  from  the  Grecian  Empire 
Deceasarily  involved  also  its  ecclesiastical.  The  more  the  power  of  the  pope 
increased  in  the  West,  the  more  decidedly  was  it  needful  to  repel  his  claims 
in  the  East.  A  full  declaration  of  the  schism  was  delayed  by  nothing  but 
the  hope  which  the  emperor  entertained,  that  he  might  obtain  some  assist- 
ance against  the  Infideb  from  the  warlike  nations  of  the  West.  But  in  an 
^wde  of  the  Patriarch  i/icAa«Z  Cerularius  (1058),  the  usual  reproaches  which 
had  been  heaped  upon  the  Romish  Church  were  increased  by  another,  which 
aeeosed  it  of  the  Jewish  heresy  of  using  unleavened  bread  ip  the  Euchar 
nt{a)  A  violent  epistolary  controversy  ensued.  Roman  legates  in  Con- 
stantinople demanded  satisfaction  for  the  offence,  and  the  patriarch  sought 
npport  against  the  policy  of  the  emperor  in  the  passions  of  the  people.  On  the 
Idth  July,  1054,  the  Roman  legates  deposited  on  the  great  altar  of  the  Church 
<if  St  Sophia  the  sentence  of  excommunication  which  had  been  issued  against 
the  patriarch,  and  shook  off  the  dust  from  their  feet  (h)  A  Greek  Synod 
bnried  back  a  sentence  of  excommunication  against  the  Roman  Church,  and 
the  other  Catholic  patriarchs  became  connected  with  Constantinople,  (c) 
Both  Churches,  the  Eastern  and  the  Western,  each  in  like  manner  claiming 
to  be  Catholic  to  the  exclusion  of  the  other,  became  henceforth  permanently 
Mparated.    In  consequence  of  the  crusades,  this  division  of  the  Church  be- 

«)  )f<tnH  Th.  XVI L  p.  87^* 

^)  Tn  be  found  onlj  in  a  Latin  innn].  in  Baroniua  ad  ann.  1058.  N.  22. 

h  Brerlft  commemoratio  eoram,  quae  geM«nint  Apocristiarii  S.  Rom.  8edl8  in  regia  urbe,  by  Car- 
^  Oumhert,  In  Baron,  ad  ann.  1054.  N.  19. 
«)  Mick.  CeruiarU  Ep.  IL  ad  Pctrom  Patr.  AnUocb.  {OoteUrit  Eoc  gr.  Monani.  Th.  IL  p. 


260  MEDIAEVAL  CnUECH  HISTORY.    PER.  IIL    A.  D.  8«V»-l*16w 

came  gradnally  ripened  into  a  national  hatred.  While  they  were  in  progreaa, 
several  eiforts  were  made  by  those  engaged  in  them  to  unite  with  the  other 
ecclesiastical  parties  of  the  East,  without  snccess  on  account  of  national  dif- 
ferences. The  Maronites^  at  that  time  a  warlike  tribe,  were  the  only  daas 
which  honestly  and  sincerely  submitted  themselves  to  the  jurisdiction  of  the 
Latin  patriarch  of  Antioch  (1182).  {(I)  The  Armenians  endeavored  to  pre- 
sent the  appearance  of  a  reconciliation  whenever  they  wished  for  assistance 
from  the  West,  but  only  a  few  individual  congregations  under  the  control 
of  the  Western  governments  maintained  any  connection  with  the  Romish 
Church,  and  were  permitted  to  retain  their  own  sacred  language  and  the 
usages  of  their  ancestors. 

§  286.    State  of  Science. 

The  science  of  this  period  corresponded  with  the  rigid  lifelessness  which 
characterized  all  departments  of  society.  But  the  study  of  the  classical 
writers  and  the  ecclesiastical  fathers,  which  had  never  been  entirely  discon- 
tinued, served  to  transmit  from  generation  to  generation  the  inheritance  of 
such  an  education  as  they  were  capable  of  imparting.  When  Bardas  com- 
menced his  administration,  it  began  to  be  perceived  that  the  proud  ^irit  of 
the  nation  could  not  long  maintain  itself  by  the  side  of  the  vigorous  cultiva- 
tion of  the  Mohammedans  and  the  Western  nations,  without  keeping  up  a 
superiority  to  them  in  learning.  He  therefore  became  the  patron  of  science, 
and  Constantinople  was  for  a  considerable  time  the  seat  of  an  eminent  lite- 
rary activity.  Histories  of  the  world,  the  empire,  and  the  Church  were 
written  by  authors  of  various  conditions  in  life  and  with  different  degrees  of 
merit,  but  all  of  them  pervaded  by  the  spirit  peculiar  to  a  resident  of  Con- 
stantinople. The  kind  of  studies  pursued  was  to  some  extent  philological 
and  rhetorical,  or  connected  with  natural  sciences,  without  any  predominance 
of  an  ecclesiastical  element.  Photivs^  who  was  even  in  scientific  matters  a 
model  for  his  Church,  has  in  his  Bibliotheea  (a)  preserved  for  subsequent 
ages  brief  extracts  and  notices  of  many  Christian  and  heathen  writers,  wlio 
would  otherwise  have  been  unknown.  His  Komocanon^  by  the  common  con- 
sent of  the  Greek  Church,  has  been  adopted  as  its  authoritative  code  of  eccle- 
siastical law.  The  first  part  embraced  the  canons  of  those  synods  whidi 
were  then  regarded  as  authoritative,  together  with  some  canonical  epistks. 
These  canons  and  epistles  had  been  collected  together  some  time  in  the  sev- 
enth century,  and  merely  received  some  additions  in  number  from  the  hands 
of  Photius.  The  second  part  contains  the  civil  laws  relating  to  the  Chnrdi, 
systematically  arranged  and  abridged  in  fourteen  sections,  with  figures  refer- 
ring to  the  corresponding  canons  of  the  first  part,  (b)    Simeon  Metaphroitet 

d)  WWl  Tyr.  XXII,  8.  Eun^mantu,  die  Maron.  tl  ihr  Verb.  x.  l«t  K.  (T&lk  QuitalMlir. 
1846.  n.  1.) 

a)  Mvpi6fitfi\oy  a.  BibL  ed.  Itn,  Bekker,  Bor.  1824a.  2  Th.  4. 

h)  The  first  Part,  together  with  the  Scholiae  of  Zonaraa  (about  1120),  and  BaUanum  (1170),  B«9€- 
regit  liuvoiiKoy  e.  Pandectae  canonnm,  Ox.  1672.  3  Th.  £  The  Secood  Part  is  In  JwMli  BibL  Th. 
IL  p.  735.  and  tlio  text  of  the  canons  which  was  written  oat  at  some  time  in  the  10th  cent  in  A, 
Miijo  Spfcil.  Roman.  Rom.  1812.  Th.  VII.  Comp.  BieMr^  %.  Rovia.  d.  Jnat  Oodex.  B«ri.  1S88L  p^ 
84fla.    ^<ok«tf  in  d.  Jen.  L.  Z.  1814.  N.  282. 


CHAP.  Vn.    OBIENT.  CHURCH.    { 28&  LIT£RATUEE.    S  237.  PAULICIANS.      261 

(10th  cent)  has  reoordod  in  a  lively  manDer  the  old  legends  of  the  oiicient 
atinta.  (e)     Oeeumeniua^  Bishop  of  Tricca  (about  990),  ('/)  Theophyhict^  Arch- 
bishop of  the  Bnlgarlans  (1107),  (e)  and  Euthymius  Zigdbenus^  a  monk  of 
Constantinople  (d.  about  1118),  (/)  formed  collections  for  the  interpretation  of 
the  Scriptures  out  of  the  writings  of  the  fathers,  which  are  valuable  because 
they  are  the  only  medium  through  which  wo  have  received  a  large  part  of 
the  treasure  from  which  they  were  drawn.    The  Creed  of  the  Church  had 
beomne  firmly  established  on  the  basis  of  ecclesiastical  tradition,  and  was 
now  decked  off  with  a  few  cautious  Aristotelian  fbrmulos.    It  had  also  been 
somewhat  tinctured  with  the  peculiarities  of  Platonism  through  the  influence 
of  the  Areopagite  and  the  fathers  of  the  fourth  century.    It  was  obliged  to 
maintain  a  perpetual  conflict  with  the  philosophy  and  heretical  opinions  of 
past  times.    A  peculiar  spirit  is  very  perceptible  in  the  controversial  writ- 
ings of  Nicholas^  Bishop  of  Methane  (died  after  IIGG),  (^)  and  in  the  Treasure 
of  Orthodoxy  (h)  which  Nieetas  Choniates  found  consolation  in  composing  in 
the  midst  of  the  misfortunes  of  his  native  land.    But  the  special  character  of 
the  age  is  most  distinctly  seen  in  the  Fanojylut^  collected  from  the  writings 
of  the  fathers  by  Euthymius  Zigabenus  by  order  of  the  theological  emperor 
Alexias  Oomnenus,  for  the  refutation  and  condemnation  of  all  heretics,  (i) 
Among  the  Oriental  parties,  the  Jacobites  were  distinguished  for  having  pre- 
serred  a  lively  current  of  the  old  Syriac  learning  through  several  successive 
geDerations. 

§  237.    Pauliciam,    Section  2.     Continued  from  §  140. 

Om^nUni  Porphyr.  BasiHus  Maceda  a  STsa.  Anna  Comnena^  Alexias.  Par.  1(V,M.  f.  L 
XIV.  p.  450m.— Ar/<A.  PtelU.  ir«pl  ivtpytia^  loufiivtav  ZiJiK.  ed.  I/tummiUUr,  Kll.  16S9.  12.  An- 
M  CSMmi.  Alex.  XV.  p.  49Ga».  Euthymii  Zygad^ni  Narratio  de  Bogom.  sea  Panopliae  tit  28.  gr. 
ZiDi  interpret  add.  OU»eUr,  Goott  ISll  4.    (Aim  in  Wolf.) 


SergiuB  (after  800),  under  the  name  of  Tychicus,  induced  the  Pnulicians 
to  return  to  the  simplicity  of  morals  which  prevailed  in  the  ancient  Church. 
After  his  death  (835)  no  single  individual  was  elected  to  preside  over 
tiwm,  but  they  were  governed  by  a  council  of  their  teachers.  The  most 
intolerable  oppressions  were  patiently  endured  by  them,  and  it  was  not  till 
the  Empress  Theodora  had  commenced  a  process  by  which  they  were  to 

c)  Never  printed  as  a  separate  work,  some  122  blogrnpliies  in  the  histories  of  the  mints  of  the 
Qi<wkind  Roman  Charehee,  and  the  Godicea,  seldom  by  thcm.vlve&  Leo  AUatim^  de  varils  SI- 
■NBib.  ct  fitmconam  scripti*.  Par.  1661  4. 

<0  ComQL  in  Acta  App.  Epp.  Paulinas  et  cath.  ed.  F.  3foreUiM,  Par.  1631.  2  Th.  fl 

•)  Comm.  to  XI L  Proph.  min.  IV.  Evr.  Acta  App.  Epp.  Paul.  (0pp.  c<L  J.  F,  B.  Jf.  dt  RubHi, 
▼«H7Bfla.4Th.t) 

/)  COBOL  Id  Paalm.  (ThsopkyL  0pp.)  In  IV.  Eyv.  ed,  C.  F  Matthaei,  Lps.  1792.  8  Th.  f. 

f)  'An^vTv^ir  r^f  dtoKoyiKrit  (rToix««<i»<r»o»»  Xlp6KKov  Tl\ar<aviKov^  ed.  Voemtl,  Frcf.  1S25. 

A)  ^ffovp^r  hfAololias  L  XXVIL,  only  the  five  first  books  in  the  transl.  by  PtL  Aforellu^, 
P«fc  m.  (BibL  PP.  max.  Th.  XXV.) 

')  IlayovAta  Zoyfiariy^  rrjs  opboZ.  Tiartvs,  Terjcov.  1711.  £  (The  extravagant  Tit  24.  apiinst 
^^  ia  SyOfurgi  Saracenlca,  ed.  Brurer.  Heidelb.  1505.)  Lat  ed.  Zino,  Yen.  15U.  f.  (Bibl.  PP. 
"C^Th.  XIX.  TIL  12  and  13  against  the  Roman  Ghnroh  is  snppre<»sed.)  Comp.  Annof  Coinn.  8up- 
P***^t»  nistortam  ecc  Oraec  p.  XL  et  XII.  spectanlla.  eA.  T.  L.  F.  Titftl,  Tab.  1S82.— /V/wman, 
^^  T.  Metbone,  Eath.  Zlg.  and  Nlc.  Ctaon.  a  d.  dogm.  Entwlckl.  d.  Oriech.  K.  im  12  Jahrh.  (Stud. 
■•Krttl8tt.P.a) 


2G2  MEDIAEVAL  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  IIL    A.  D.  800-121& 

be  utterly  extenninated  by  a  general  massacre,  that  they  flew  to  arms.  An 
imperial  general  whose  name  was  Carhecu  (844),  actuated  by  a  desire  of  re- 
venge for  the  wrongs  which  his  father  had  sustained  from  the  government, 
became  their  leader,  formed  an  alliance  with  the  Arabians,  and  strongly  forti- 
fied Tephrica^  a  mountain-hold  on  the  eastern  confines  of  the  empire.  He 
and  his  successor  Chrysocheres^  with  all  the  cruelty  which  fanaticism  inspires, 
made  excursions  from  this  fortress,  and  laid  waste  the  provinces  of  Asia  Mi- 
nor. Although  the  Emperor  Bctsil  finally  succeeded  in  destroying  Tephrica 
(871),  many  Paulicians  maintained  their  existence  as  a  people  in  the  moun- 
tainous regions,  and  kept  the  extreme  portions  of  the  empire  in  continual 
agitation.  That  he  might  break  up  their  connections  with  the  Saracens,  John 
ZimUces  formed  a  treaty  with  tliem  (970),  in  accordance  with  which  they 
were  for  the  most  part  removed  to  Thrace,  where  a  colony  of  tliem  had  been 
formed  even  in  the  eighth  century.  Here  they  acknowledged  a  certain  kind 
of  allegiance  to  the  empire,  but  in  the  independent  possession  of  PhUippo- 
polu  they  served  with  great  bravery  as  border  sentinels.  Alexius  Camne- 
nus  having  been  abandoned  by  a  large  band  of  them  in  the  Norman  war, 
effected  their  subjugation  by  stratagem  and  violence  (after  1085).  During  his 
residence  in  his  winter  quarters  in  Thrace  (1115)  he  sought  the  honor  of  their 
conversion,  and  in  fact  many  of  them  yielded  to  the  arts  of  the  imperial 
apostle.  But  the  Paulicians,  under  the  name  of  Euchites,  with  Manichean 
doctrines  and  fanatical  forms  of  prayer,  and  under  Elders  who  were  regarded 
as  apostles  of  Thrace,  had  before  th:s  become  numerous  among  the  Bulga- 
rians, (a)  The  afSnities  of  these  people  for  the  Slavonic  Dualism  gave  them 
acceptance  in  that  nation  among  which  they  were  commonly  called  Bogo- 
mil^.  According  to  their  system  of  faith^  the  original  Source  of  all  Being 
had  two  sons,  called  Satanael  and  Logos.  In  his  attempts  to  attain  equality 
with  the  Father  the  former  became  evil  in  his  nature,  seduced  the  angels 
from  their  allegiance,  and  formed  the  visible  universe.  Through  the  divine 
powers  which  he  still  retained  he  created  man,  and  by  Eve  he  became  the 
father  of  Cain.  All  ecclesiastical  organizations  were  established  under  the 
influence  of  Satanael,  and  had  their  principal  seat  formerly  at  Jerusalem,  but 
then  at  the  Church  of  St.  Sophia  in  Constantinople.  The  holy  Virgin  con- 
ceived in  consequence  of  an  influence  through  the  ear,  and  Christ  in  the 
body  of  an  angel  succeeded  in  overcoming  his  elder  brother.  The  Bogomiles 
acknowledged  the  authority  of  the  Psalms  and  of  sixteen  prophets  in  the 
Old  Testament,  and  received  many  apocryphal  books,  (h)  but  they  gave  an 
allegorical  interpretation  to  the  sacred  history,  and  to  the  usages  of  the 
Church.  In  the  garb  of  monasticism  they  concealed  themselves  even  in  Con- 
stantinople until  Alexius  extorted  a  confession  from  them,  and  homed  Basi- 
lius  their  leader  at  the  stake  (1118).  (e)  Small  communities  of  Bogomiles 
were  found  among  the  Bulgarians  through  the  whole  period  of  the  middle 
ages,  and  Paulicians  have  continued  to  exist  imder  many  changes  in  and 
around  Philippopolis  and  in  the  valleys  of  the  Haemus  until  the  present  day. 

a)  Schniteer,  d.  Each,  im  11.  Jahrh.  {SHrm't  Stud.  d.  OelsU.  Wart  toL  II.  H.  1.) 

b)  Liber  S.  Joannia.  (77Mo  Cod.  apocr.  Th.  L  [k  8S4.)    Yisio  laa.  ({  89,  note  d,) 

c)  J.  a  Wolf,  Hist  Bogom.  Vlt  1712.  4    L.  Oedtr^  Prodr.  H.  Bog.  crit  GoetL  1I4S.4.    Enq^^ 
hardt,  d.  Bog.  (KGcsob.  Abhh.  ErL  1883.  N.  2.) 


FOURTH    PERIOD. 

FROM  INNOCENT  III.  TO  LUTHER. 

§  238.     General   View  and  HUtarical  Writers, 

1)  S  170.  Fontes  reram  Germ.  Geecbichtsquellen  Deutachl.  (14.  Jlc  la  Jbh.)  ed.  by  J,  F.  Boehmer^ 

Stattf.  ISIS-A.  2  vols.    AWertu9  Stadeiuriik,  Benedictine  Abbot,  Franciscan,  died  after  1260,  Chron. 

till  125«.ed.  RHnece.  15S7.  Vit.  16oa  4.  {SehiUeri  Scrr.  rer.  gcnn.  vol.  II.  p.  128.X  Continuation 

12M-18^  ««1.  A.  Iftijery  Ilafn.  1720.     Vinc^ntiua  Btllovacen$U,  Dominic,  in  Koyemont,  died  about 

IMi,  Specnlam  blstorialo,  till  12S0.  Argent.  147a  4  vols,  t  Aug.  1474.  8  voK  f.  (SvhUmer^  Vine.  v. 

BctaTtli  fL  Krzieli.   m.  8  Abb.  Frkf.  1519.  2  toIn)    Matthetts  Pari*^  BenetltcL  in  S.  Albans, 

Hl<  maj«»r  till  1259.  (1066-12:».  from  tbe  Cliron.  of  Roger  <fe  Wendav^r,  Lond.  1S40.)  contin.  by 

W.  Rhktniff^^  m  1273,  ed.  Wii^,  Lond.  1044.  16S4.  [publ.  by  the  Camden  Sikj.  edited  by //</«<- 

fuU.  Lond.  1S40.]  f.  Jc  often.    JoanneBde  WinieiViur,  Franclbc.,  Chron.  1215— 184S.    (Tbesaar.  Hist 

HdT.  Tit  1785.  t)   Alberiun  Ai geutinemU,  Chron.  1278-1878.  iUrfdin  vol.  II.  p.  95.)   The  Strasburg 

Cbnialcle  by  Closener  (died  13i)4.)  cIot$cs  at  1862.  ed.  by  a  Lit.  Aoaoc.  In  Stnttgard.  1848.   Jac.  Twinger 

of  loni^iAo/m,  a  priest  of  Strosbnrg,  died  1420.    Elsafifi.  Chron.  till  1^6^  ed.  by  Schilter.  Strasb. 

16K.  4.  {k'unisch,  KTmigik,  A  hU  Chron.    In  W.  MUlUr't  Ascauia.  Jfjid.  1820.  P.  II.    Strobel  de 

T.Closneri  Chron.  germ.  Arg.  1S29.)    G obeli nua  Perttona,  Dean  of  Bielefeld,  die<i  1420,  Co^modro- 

miun.  Independently  1840-141$.  {ifeihoni,  vol.  I.  p.  58.)    Antoninu*^  Dominic.  Archbish.  of  Flor- 

eoce,  Somma  btstorialis  till  1459.  Nor.  1484.  8  vols.  f.  &  often.    (0pp.  Flor.  1741m.  vol.  I.)     Werner 

BofJUt,  ChrtbnsUn  In  Cologne,  d.  1500,  Faac  temponim  till  1476.  CoL  1474.  t  &  often.    Cont  by 

A  LiiUuriu$  tlU  1514.  {PMor.  Struve  vol  H.  p.  847.)— 2)  AUpertinue  MuHnatus,  of  Padua,  d.  1880, 

Dist  AnguBta  Ilenr.  VII.    De  goRtisi  Italor.  jKist  mortem  Hcnr.  till  1317,  Ludftv.  Bavanis,  Fragment 

{MnraL  vol.  X.)      Git'T.   Vmuni,  of  Florence,  St<irle   Florentine  till    1?49.  cont  by  J/utteo  & 

FiUppo  nUani  till  1864.  {Marat  vol.  XIIIs.)  Mil.  1729.  f.  &  often.    Jean  FroUunirU  of  Valen- 

«loB<^  d.  1441,  Chron.  de  France,  d'Angl.  etc.  1826-1400.  Par.  1508.  1504.  4  vols.  f.  revue  p.  &iur 

M^  Lyon.  15599&.  4  vols,  t    In  the  ColL  des  Chroniques  par  BucAon,  Par.  1S24. 10-25  vols,  of  the 

Mlh  cent    {Praetorius  u.   Froiss     In  8clil(*5er*s  Arch.  £  Gcsoh.   1888.   vol.    V.)     [Chronicles 

of  EiigL  France,  S[»ain,  *c.,  transl.  new  ed.  Ixmd.  1S45. 2  vola  8.]   Phil,  de  CMnmines,  d.  1509,  Chron. 

rtilklolre  1464-9^  Par.  1528.  C  &  often,  rev.  p.  L.  du  Fretinoy,  Lond.  1747.  4  vols.  4.    Fr.  Guicci- 

^ini,  d.  1540.  SUiria  d'ltalia,  149ii-1582.  Von.  1567   4.  &  often.     [IIi.*.t  of  Italy  fi-om  1498-1582, 

tfiML  bj  A.  P.  Goddard,  2  ed.  1775,  Lond.  9  v<»l».  8.    Froi.ssari,  Cominlnos  &  Guiccianlini  have 

^trtnsL  into  Eng.  Sc  publir«he<l  t^tgcther.  New  York  &  Lond.  1848]    The  portions  of  Onic.  sup- 

pvened  by  public  aathority  are  in  l/eidegger,  111:4.  Papatus,  ed.  2.  Amst  1C9S.     Guldohti  Monarchla 

^IIL  p.  17s«. — 8)  Cocciu^  SubelllcuSy  Hbtoriogr.  of  Venice,  d.  1506,  Enneades  »,  rhaps<Hlia  Histo- 

rt«niDtlll  1504,  Yen.  149S?s.  2  voK  t  &  often.  (0pp.  Ba.\  1560.  4  vols,  f  )— 4)  PMewaeuM  de  Fiado- 

•S^lMcenHfi.  D«>mln.  Bl?h.  of  Torcello,  <l  1827,  Hist  ecc  till  1812.  {ilurat  vol.  XL  p.  741.) 

^riiktmim,  d.  1516.    Annales  l/trtaugiensee  880-1514.  8.  Galli  1690.  2  vols,  f— 5)  Astronomical 

Hk  of  the  Empire  by  Georg.  AcrcpoliUt^  1204-61.  ed.  Leo  AUatim^  Par.  1651.  t    Georg.  Pachy- 

*««  1258-1809.  ed.  Poitinn»^  IJom.  1661s».  2  vols.  f.    Im.  Better,  Bonn.  1S35.    A'iceph.  Gregoraa^ 

^*H-18M.  ed.  BoivinuB,  Par.  1702.  2  vols,  t   Joan.  Cantacuunos  1820-54.  e<l.  PanUmm,  Par.  1645. 

^vokt   Joan,  Ihusat  1841-1462,  ed.  BuUi^ildwt,  Par.  1649  t    ChalcondyUtB  1298-1462,  ed.  Fa- 

*^  Psr.  1650.  t    Georg.  Phranue*  1401-77,  Lat  ed.  P&ntanus,  Ingoldst  1604.  4. 

For  a  considerable  time  the  hierarchy  apparently  preserved  its  position  at 
^«  zenith  of  its  power.  But  in  consequence  of  those  abuses  to  which  un- 
"Diited  authority  always  leads  when  intrusted  to  human  hands,  pnblic  favor, 
^  which  it  entirely  rested,  soon  became  aliennted  from  it.    The  claims  which 


264  MEDIAEVAL  CUUBCH  HI8T0BT.    FEB.  IV.    A.  D.  1216-1017. 

it  set  up  were  ae  exorbitant  as  ever,  and  even  more  so,  bnt  as  they  were 
generally  repelled,  they  were  productive  only  of  injury  to  itself.  The  power 
of  the  Papacy  and  of  the  empire  were  so  conducted  as  mutually  to  destroy 
one  another.  The  kings  always  found  support  against  the  encroachments  of 
the  popes  in  the  sense  of  justice  and  in  the  strong  love  of  independence  which 
existed  in  the  hearts  of  their  people.  Under  tlie  uniform  improvement  in  the 
dispositions  and  habits  of  the  people,  which  the  Church  had  fostered  in  every 
European  country,  peculiar  nationalities  now  began  to  be  prominently  devel- 
oped. An  intellectual  education  was  extended  among  the  people  without  the 
aid  of  the  Church,  by  means  of  which  the  popular  mind  became  more  ma- 
ture, and  lost  its  peculiar  ecclesiastical  character.  In  these  circumstances 
the  hierarchy  attempted  to  maintain  its  ascendency  by  intrigues  and  direct 
force,  and  while  it  was  struggling  for  its  own  existence  it  could  no  longer 
afford  protection  against  political  despotism.  A  reformation  extending  not 
only  to  the  members  but  to  the  very  head  of  the  Church  was  generally  re- 
garded as  indispensable,  and  was  in  various  quarters  actually  attempted. 
Catholicism  itself  appeared  to  have  become  for  many  nations  an  antiquated 
system,  and  not  adapted  to  the  existing  condition  of  things.  And  yet,  as  it 
may  often  be  remarked  in  history,  that  great  spiritual  principles  sometimes 
produce  their  sublimest  forms  just  as  they  are  about  to  be  subverted,  eo 
Catholicism  accomplished  its  noblest  achievements  during  this  period.  The 
papacy  was  still  the  most  prominent  of  all  actors  in  history,  although  its 
sphere  was  frequently  limited  to  the  circle  of  French  and  Italian  politics. 
The  life  of  a  few  princes  sometimes  becomes  the  leading  object  in  the  picture 
of  events,  and  new  powers  are  raised  up  for  the  deliverance  of  the  Church. 
General  history  was  still  written  in  the  same  ecclesiastical  style  in  which  it 
had  formerly  been  composed.  Vincent  of  BeautaU^  in  his  Encyclopfedia  of 
all  the  knowledge  and  movements  of  his  times,  has  given  us  a  clear  and  true  pic- 
ture of  his  age.  Matthew  Paris^  in  his  English  history,  containing  also  many 
sagacious  observations  respecting  all  the  countries  of  Western  Europe,  has 
not  hesitated  to  disclose,  with  some  bitterness,  the  crimes  of  the  ecclesiasti* 
cal  rulers,  for  this  rigid  monk  was  animated  by  a  supreme  love  to  the  Church 
itself.  Albert  of  Strashurg^  a  candid  and  faithful  writer,  presents  lively 
views  of  individual  characters.  The  Alsatian  Chronicle  presents  a  history  of 
the  people  whose  name  it  bears  in  their  own  language.  Antoninus  of  Florene§ 
composed  a  general  history,  in  which  the  future  saint  has  displayed  the  most 
undoubting  faith  and  much  modest  criticism.  Several  statesmen  have  also 
given  us  histories,  in  which  are  presented  the  views  of  men  in  secular  life. 
Among  those  were :  Albertinun  Mnuatus^  who  wrote  a  history  of  his  own 
times  and  of  neighboring  countries,  in  a  manner  somewhat  harsh  but  accu- 
rate ;  Villani^  who,  with  his  brother  and  nephew,  composed  a  history  of 
Florence,  with  which  also  is  connected  many  notices  of  the  Middle  Ages 
generally,  in  a  style  of  old  Roman  simplicity ;  Froissart^  in  whose  Chronides 
the  wars  and  royal  courts  of  Western  Europe  are  described  with  an  extreme 
relish  for  the  glories  of  the  declining  orders  of  knighthood ;  and  dnnminsi^ 
in  whose  work  we  have  the  memorials  of  an  age  in  which  he  sat  at  the  helm 
of  affairs,  and  knew  all  the  secrets  of  its  history.    The  extreme  character  of 


CDAP.  L    PAPACY.    $889.  FREDEBIO  IL    6RE00ST  IX  265 

thb  clan  of  writers  may  be  best  seen  in  Guieciardini^  in  whose  history  of 
Italy  we  have  a  true  and  liyely  picture  of  events,  in  which  he  was  too  inti- 
mately concerned  always  to  be  impartial.  Finally,  we  have  the  brilliancy  of 
clasac  learniDg  displayed  in  the  General  History  written  by  Sdbellicus,  In 
immediate  connection  with  the  snbject  of  Chnrch  History,  Ptolemaeua  of 
Lueea  compiled  a  work  which  is  of  considerable  critical  value,  on  acconnt  of 
the  great  number  of  authorities  which  ho  has  carefully  quoted,  with  respect 
to  the  times  immediately  preceding  his  own.  In  a  Chronicle  of  the  old 
Benedictine  Abbey  of  Trittenheim^  is  also  interwoven  the  history  of  the 
general  Church,  especially  so  far  as  relates  to  Grermany,  with  much  learning, 
but  with  an  extreme  bias  for  orthodoxy.  The  Byzantine  historians^  in  the 
lofty  style  of  writing  peculiar  to  their  ancient  authors,  have  described  the 
•olemnities,  the  afSictions,  and  the  commotions  of  the  Eastern  Roman  Em- 
pire, in  which  they  generally  bore  so  important  a  part.  But  in  the  opinions 
nhich  they  express  respecting  western  affairs,  allowance  must  be  made  for 
the  asperity  of  feeling  produced  by  the  dominion  of  the  Latins  and  the  abor- 
tiTe  attempts  frequently  made  at  reconciliation. 


CHAP.  I.— RELATION  OF  THE  PAPACY  TO  GENERAL  AFFAIRS. 

Uirt  PoloDiw.  (at  tbe  bead  of  {  171.)  B«mardu9  Ouido^  Dominic  Bi»bop  of  Lo<1eve,  d.  1881. 
4imaZrieif4  Augerii,  Augustinlan,  about  1865.  botb  until  John  XXII.  (JIurat.  vol.  IIL  P.  I,  II.) 
PkUna  {BarthoL  Sacchi),  Abbrcriator,  d.  14S1,  Vltao  Pontlflcnm  Rom.  Yen.  14T9.  f  Later  editt. 
ihtfBd:  the  Dutch  edltt  wltboat  the  name  of  the  place  of  pub.  are  correct  according  to  the  ed.  prin- 
«pi  1460. 1645;  Sc  16M.  12.  7:kaodaricu»  de  Niem^  abbroviator,  d.  about  1417,  named  as  the  author 
«f  Vitie  Pontlfll  Rom.  1288-1418.  addltla  Imperatt  gestis.  {.Eccard  voL  I.  p.  14C1.)  Leon.  AreUnuB, 
PiH?«Tctapy,  d.  1444,  remm  wio  temp,  in  Ital.  gcstar.  Commtr.  18T8-1440.  {ifuraiori  vol  XIX.  p. 
M.)  Yitae  Paparun  Arenlonensium,  ed.  Steph.  AtlueittA,  Par.  I<t98.  2  voIa.  4.  to  be  corrected  by 
"■fvcttee  to:  Hist  des  eouveraina  Pontifes  dans  Avifrnon,  Avign.  1777.  4  Lives  of  particular  Popes 
ik  Mural  vol  IIL  P.  I,  IL  Orig  Docc  In  Raynald.  J.  Voigt,  Stimmen  a.  Rom.  u.  (L  papstL  llof 
tolSL  ^tbrh.  {Raumer'a  hist  Taschenb.  1832.  N.  i.)— Boehmer,  Regesta  Imperil.  119S-12M.  Lately 
•>*M.  atntg.  1S49.  4.    Regeste  Imp.  124«-18ia  Lately  revised.  Stuttg.  1844  4 

§  289.    Frederic  IL     {l\^4r-Dec.  18, 1250. 

I  PHHde  VlntU^  (d.  1249.)  Epp.  I  VL  ed.  Itt^lin.  Basil.  1740.  2  vols.  Bothmer,  Reg.  Imp.  p^ 
^  Perti  Tol.  IV.  p.  22Sfla  Extraota  f^m  the  Regestis  Ifonor.  Jll.  et  Oreg.  JX.  in  Raynald  da 
^•mtr.  Riccardi  de  S.  Germane  Chron.  1189-1248.  {Afurat  vol.  VII.  p.  968.)  Con  tin.  by  AHo. 
UhmgOia  tm  1238.  (/».  vol.  VIII.  p.  4S9.) 

n.  (Aw*)  OeMjbichte  Friedr.  IL  ZGll.  1792.  Raumer,  vols.  IlI-IV.  p.  211.  W.  Zimmermann,  die 
B>^it  a  Kampr  d.  Mooarchie  gegen  Papst  a.  repubL  Freih.  Stuttg.  1838.  2  vols.— C  Uti/l^t  K. 
^Mr.  IL  ICuaicb  1844 

The  most  enlarged  mental  endowments  and  the  highest  earthly  powers 
^•^  poBKaaed  by  Frederic  II,  for  the  accomplishment  of  the  destiny  of  the 
^"•w  of  Hobenstaufen.  By  means  of  the  Saracen  population  of  Sicily,  a 
W  of  whom  he  had  indnced  to  settle  in  Apnlia,  he  always  had  an  army 
""•dy  with  which  to  terrify  the  states  of  the  Chnrch.  Hence  the  mild  dis- 
poation  of  Banorius  III  (after  1216)  was  satisfied  when  the  inheritance 
"^<peathed  by  the  Countess  Matilda  was  secured  to  him,  and  he  made  no 
''^I'taoce  when  the  emperor'i  oldest  son,  already  heir  apparent  to  the  throne 


266  MEDIAEVAL  CHUBCH  HISTORY.    PER.  IV.    A.  D.  ISlMOir. 

of  Sicily,  was  elected  to  be  the  next  snecessor  in  the  empire,  and  when  all 
the  privileges  of  the  Sicilian  monarchy  were  re-established.  On  his  corona- 
tion at  Aix-la-Chapelle,  Frederic  had  taken  the  vow  of  the  cross,  and  bad 
subsequently  renewed  it  at  Rome.  By  his  marriage  with  lolante,  the  heiress 
of  the  kingdom  of  Jerusalem,  the  obligation  to  perform  this  vow  seemed  to 
have  become  more  imperious.  But  the  emperor,  occupied  with  the  care  of 
establishing  his  power  in  Italy,  always  pleaded  for  a  longer  delay.  The  last 
period  fixed  upon  expired  just  as  Honorius  died  (March  18,  1227),  and  was 
succeeded  by  Gregory  IX,  This  pope  was  a  nephew  of  Innocent  III.,  and 
like  that  prince  possessed  much  skill  in  law,  and  an  inflexible  resolution.  In 
his  obstinate  old  age  he  was  oven  less  restrained  by  a  regard  to  the  conse- 
quences of  what  he  regarded  as  right,  (a)  On  the  15th  August,  1227,  the  em- 
peror set  sail  from  Brundusium,  but  in  three  days  returned,  on  account  of  a 
pretended  or  at  least  a  very  convenient  sickness.  Gregory  then  issued  against 
him  a  sentence  of  excommunication,  and  was  consequently  driven  from  Home 
by  the  emperor's  adherents.  Frederic  now  appealed  to  the  Ohristian  world 
with  severe  accusations  against  the  pope,  and  without  troubling  himself  to 
obtain  a  release  from  a  papal  ban  which  he  regarded  as  uigust  and  invalid, 
he  again  embarked  for  Palestine,  August,  1228.  But  the  anathema  preceded 
him,  and  induced  his  natural  allies  in  the  East  to  arm  themselves  agiunst 
him.  At  the  same  time  a  great  host  of  ecclesiastical  emissaries  fell  upon  his 
Italian  inheritance.  In  this  extremity,  from  the  personal  favor  of  his  oppo- 
nent, Camel,  Sultan  of  Egypt,  a  truce  of  ten  years  was  obtained,  during 
which  it  was  agreed  that  he  should  retain  possession  of  the  kingdom  of  Jem- 
salem.  He  entered  the  holy  city  in  triumph  (March  17,  1229),  placed  upon 
his  head  the  crown  of  Jerusalem,  hastened  back  to  Italy,  and  drove  the  papa] 
soldiers  before  him.  Many  disapproved  of  the  violent  measures  of  the  popo 
against  a  crusader,  and  after  vainly  using  his  utmost  efforts  in  every  place,  to 
stir  up  enemies  against  the  greatest  hero  of  that  century,  Gregory  obtained 
from  his  policy  or  piety  an  honorable  peace  at  St.  Germano  (Aug.  28,  1230). 
The  pope  was  obliged  to  submit  to  the  overwhelming  power  of  the  emperor^ 
and  to  accept  of  the  code  of  laws  edited  by  Peter  of  Vinea  (1281),  by  which 
the  law  of  the  two  Sicilies  was  firmly  established,  and  though  heretics  were 
surrendered  to  the  hands  of  the  Church,  the  secular  power  of  the  Church  was 
made  strictly  subordinate  to  the  State.  (Jb)  But  when  Frederic  again  prose- 
cuted the  struggle  his  family  were  always  obliged  to  maintain  with  the  Lom- 
bards, the  pope  once  more  formed  an  alliance  with  the  friends  of  popular 
freedom,  and  in  a  sentence  of  excommunication  pronounced  against  him 
on  Palm  Sunday,  1239,  released  all  his  subjects  from  their  oath  of  alle- 
giance, and  surrendered  his  body  to  the  devil  for  the  salvation  of  his 
soul.  Each  party  now  sought  by  written  manifestoes  to  gain  over  to  its  side 
the  favorable  judgment  of  the  people,  and  the  two  great  heads  of  Christen- 
dom confronted  each  other  with  charges  of  heresy.  In  their  controversial 
writings  the  specifications  against  each  other  are  clothed  sometimes  in  the 


a)  Vita  Greg,  by  persons  near  him.  {Murat  toI.  IIL  p.  576.) 

h)  ConstitaUones  Begnm  Siciliae.  Neap.  1786^  t    Jtaumer,  toL  III  p.  Site. 


CHAP.  L    PAPACY.    1 289.  INNOCENT  IV.    1 24a  CONRAD  IV.  267 

most  common  language  of  ordinary  life,  and  at  other  times  with  the  poetic 
imagery  of  the  apocalypse.    Frederic  interpreted  the  favor  which  the  pope 
showed  toward  the  Lombards  as  an  evidence  of  his  partiality  for  the  Cathar- 
ists  living  in  their  midst.     Gregory  accused  the  emperor  of  being  the  author 
of  the  profane  remark  respecting  the  three  impostors  who  had  deceived  the 
world,  and  justified  the  imputation  by  a  reference  to  the  impartial  justice 
with  which  he  had  treated  the  Saracens,  the  relish  with  which  he  had  en- 
tered into  oriental  pleasures,  and  several  insolent  expressions  with  regard  to 
the  minicles  of  the  Church,  (r)    Frederic,  who  certainly  had  more  faith  in 
astrology  than  in  priests,  not  only  proved  his  orthodoxy  but  conquered  the 
territories  of  the  Church  until  he  sat  down  under  the  very  walls  of  Rome. 
The  i)ope  called  a  general  council  of  the  Church.     The  emperor  gave  orders 
that  the  fleet  which  conveyed  the  bishops  to  Home  should  bo  captured. 
Gregory  died  unavenged  (Aug.  21,  1241),  and  after  many  tedious  dissen- 
sions among  the  cardinals,  Innocent  IV.  (Fiesco  of  Lavagna)  was  chosen  in 
lus  stead  (June  24,  1243).    The  new  pope  had  been  the  friend  of  the  empe- 
ror, but  after  various  ineffectual  efforts  to  conclude  a  peace  ho  became  a  mor- 
tal enemy.     By  the  aid  of  his  countrymen  the  Genoese,  ho  escaped  from 
Italy,  and  at  the  general  council  of  Lyons  (1245),  {d)  he  once  more  hurled 
forth  all  the  curses  of  the  Church  against  the  emperor,  as  a  heretic  and  a 
sacrilegious  robber.    The  contest  was  waged  not  only  with  spiritual  but  with 
carnal  weapons,  for  the  po[)e  endeavored  to  secure  assistance  by  exciting 
insurrections  in  Germany  and  in  Sicily.     Frederic  died  without  yielding  to 
tbe  papal  claims,  {e)  but  among  the  people  many  believed  that  his  body  would 
Ke  no  corruption,  and  at  the  proper  time  that  he  would  return  and  over- 
throw the  exorbitant  power  of  the  priesthood. 

§  240.     Ocerthroio  of  the  House  of  Iloliemtaufen, 

L  Boehmer,  Reg.  p.  25Se:^  JamiiUa^  cent  by  an  unknown  band  Ull  1265.  {Mural,  voL  VIII.  p. 
96l)»Ddby  U)«  Gaelph  Saha  Malasptna,  rer.  Sicul  1.  VI.  1250-78.  {lb.  p.  73!.) 

IL  W.  Jdger^  Oesch.  Col  reds  IL  Nuremb.  1767.  Pfister^  Gcsch.  v.  Schwaben.  Ileilb.  1808.  vol. 
VL  MaunMr,  vol  IV.  p.  52^48. 

Innocent  IV.  now  proclaimed  that  the  sacrilegious  house  of  Hohenstaufen 
bad  for  ever  forfeited  all  title  to  sovereignty,  and  he  hastened  to  take  posses- 
aon  of  Sicily  as  a  vacant  fief  of  the  Church.  But  Conrad  IV.  abandoned 
Germany  to  its  own  dissensions  and  conquered  his  Italian  patrimony.  Italy, 
however,  was  fatal  to  him,  and  at  his  early  death  (1254)  he  left  nothing  for 
bis  son  Conradin  but  the  remnant  of  his  paternal  inheriUmce  in  Suabia.  The 
German  crown  was  purchased  by  foreigners  from  the  imperial  princes,  who 
^«re  controlled  by  papal  influence.  The  Two  Sicilies  were  seized  upon  by 
^tfred^  a  natural  son  of  Frederic,  and  in  them  he  established  a  popular 
SOTemment,  against  w^hich  Innocent  preached  a  crusade  in  vain.    The  popes^ 

0  Tbe  remark  wan  first  made  by  Simon  de  Tournay^  1201,  &  tbe  treatise  dc  trlbus  impostorlboa 
H  pr.  i^,  a,)  belongs  to  the  16th  cent  Bosenkranz^  d.  Zwetfcl  am  glauben.  Kritik  d.  Scrr.  do  trib. 
W<^  Hal  a.  L.  188a  De  impoetura  rel.  breve  compend.  s.  L.  de  trib.  impost  edit,  with  lit  IntrofI* 
*yCfl,tt^.  Lp\l>83. 

^  Vita  Inn  by  bis  Confessor,  Xic  dc  Curhio.  {Jfurat,  vol.  IIL  p.  502.)  Loehmer,  Reg.  p.  812fl8. 

^  Hia  Wm  Muratori  Th.  IX.  p.  Mlsi  Bothmer^  p.  810. 


268  MEDIAEVAL  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PKB.  IV.    A.  D.  1316-1517. 

perceiviDg  that  their  power  was  insnAScient  to  keep  posseflsion  of  the  two 
Sicilies,  sold  their  title,  first  to  England  and  then  to  France.  Finally  Charlm 
of  Anjou^  hy  the  aid  of  Clement  IV.  (1265-68),  became  king  of  the  Two 
Sicilies  after  the  death  of  Manfred  in  the  battle  of  Benevento  (1266).  But 
Conradin  felt  called  upon  by  the  spirits  of  his  ancestors  to  leave  the  circle 
of  his  yonthf\il  associates  in  Soabia,  and  attempt  the  conquest  of  his  patri- 
monial possessions  beyond  the  Alps.  He  no  sooner  made  his  appearance  there 
than  he  wns  hailed  as  a  deliverer  by  all  disaffected  persons.  But  being  de- 
feated at  the  battle  of  Tagliacozzo,  he  was  taken  prisoner  while  flying  from 
his  pursuers,  and  having  passed  through  the  miserable  farce  of  a  legal  trial, 
the  last  of  the  Hohenstaufens  closed  his  life  on  the  scaflTold  on  the  29th  Octo- 
ber, 1268.  The  popes  now  had  the  satisfaction  of  having  utterly  destroyed 
the  family  of  their  most  powerful  enemy,  and  their  triumph  was  purchased 
by  the  complete  distraction  of  Germany,  the  dismemberment  of  Italy,  and 
the  ascendency  of  France. 

§  241.    St  Lovis.    (1215.)    1226.— Jw^.  25, 1270. 

I.  Joint ilU,  (S€neschal  to  Louis)  Iltst  de  S.  Loai^  p.  Ch.  du  Freane,  Par.  1668.  t  1761.  t  Im^ 
dovici^  Vita  et  Conversatio  per  Gaufredum  de  BeUoloeo^  ConfMBorem,  et  OuU.  Odmoientemt  Gb- 
pellanoQi  eju&  {Du  Chetns  vol.  V.  p.  444)  Ludotioi  Ep.  de  eapUone  et  Hberatione  saa.  (/b.  ^ 
80508.) 

XL  WUkm^  7th  vol :  Die  KreozzQge  Lnd.  des  Hell.  a.  der  VerlosL  des  b.  Landes.  Lpa.  1882. 

Louis  IX.  was,  in  his  pious  conscientiousness,  a  sincere  Ghrisdan ;  in  his 
scrupulous  austerities  and  saintly  humility,  a  rigid  monk ;  and  in  the  energy 
and  equity  of  his  transactions,  even  with  the  hierarchy,  a  noble  prince.  On 
his  recovery  from  a  dangerous  illness  he  assumed  the  vow  of  the  cross,  and 
maintained  his  resolution  against  all  France  with  such  success  that  by  his 
policy  and  enthusiasm  the  whole  nation  was  Induced  to  co-operate  in  the 
sacred  struggle.  The  Holy  Land  had  been  devastated  by  the  incursions  of 
the  wild  tribe  of  the  Ghowaresmians,  and  had  once  more  fallen  into  the 
hands  of  the  Sultan  of  Egypt  (1247).  Palestine  could  be  conquered  only  in 
Egypt.  Damietta  was  taken  by  Louis  in  the  spring  of  the  year  1249,  but 
when  the  crusaders  advanced  into  the  interior  of  the  country,  between  the 
dykes  of  the  Nile  which  had  been  cut  through,  they  were  attacked  by  famine 
and  pestilence.  Louis  was  at  last  obliged  to  purchase  a  return  to  his  own 
land  with  the  wealth  of  his  kingdom.  But  in  the  midst  of  his  misfortunes  be 
was  still  unsubdued  in  spirit  and  unseduced  to  evil.  By  the  encouragement 
which  he  showed  to  the  third  estate,  and  by  the  record  which  he  made  of 
the  established  usages  of  the  nation  he  gave  a  firm  legal  basis  to  the  state,  and 
by  the  pragmatu  aanetion  (1269)  gave  stability  to  the  national  church.*  In 
heart  he  was  not  unmindful  of  his  vow,  and  even  when  advanced  in  ago,  with 
Christ's  crown  of  thorns  In  his  hand  he  called  upon  the  nobility  of  Fhince 
by  their  love  and  honor  to  prosecute  the  crusades.  When  the  expedition 
accordingly  set  out.  It  was  induced,  by  the  hope  either  of  an  easier  oonqnest 
or  of  the  conversion  of  their  enemies,  or  by  the  Influence  of  Charles  of  An- 


•  Leibnitii  Mantissa.  P.  L  p.  157.    Comp.  Baum^r,  roL  VI.  p^  1\%^ 


CHAP.  L  PAPACY.  $  241.  ST.  LOUIS.  $  248.  RUDOLPH  OF  HAPSBUBO.   269 

jon,  to  turn  aside  for  the  invasion  of  Tunis.  The  plan  of  establishing  a 
French  colony  there  was  frnstrated  by  the  carelessness  of  the  king,  and  the 
nnfaYorablo  character  of  the  climate.  Louis  died  of  the  plague  before  Tunis, 
and  with  him  as  with  the  Emperor  Frederic,  perished  the  work  to  which  he 
had  dedicated  his  life.  Louis  belonged  rather  to  a  former  age,  wliile  Fred- 
eric labored  fbr  results  which  could  be  attained  only  in  the  distant  future. 
Hence  both  of  them  seemed  to  toil  in  vain,  but  both  were  illustrious  in  their 
lives. 

§  242.     The  Termination  of  the  Crusades. 

The  Latin  empire  in  Constantinople  continued  still,  but  it  was  perpetually 
torn  by  internal  divisions,  and  regarded  by  the  people  as  a  foreign  yoke.    Its 
etpital  therefore  fell  an  easy  prey  even  to  the  feeble  arms  of  the  Greeks 
under  Michiul  Palaeologus  (1261).    Palestine  and  Syria,  though  frequently 
reconquered,  were  always  again  lost  in  consequence  of  the  divisions  in  the 
Christian  host.    God  seemed  to  have  forsaken  his  own  cause,  (a)    Tlie  ro- 
mantic enthusiasm  which  had  exhibited  so  many  interesting  forms  had  now 
given  place  to  a  more  sober,  but  more  selfish  spirit,  and  Mount  Calvaries  were 
constructed  nearer  home.     Gregory  X,  (1271-76)  exerted  all  the  influence 
which  a  pope  possessed,  to  obtain  possession  of  the  East  by  a  new  crusade, 
md  thus  preserve  it  for  Christianity,  but  his  efforts  were  entirely  vain,  (i) 
Ptolemais  (Acre),  the  last  fortress  of  the  crusaders,  was  stormed  by  the  Egyp- 
tian host  on  the  18th  May,  1291.  (<;)    The  only  benefit  which  the  cmsades 
coold  accomplish  was  for  the  spiritual  and  commercial  interests  of  the  West- 
em  nations,  and  this  office  they  had  now  fulfilled,  {d) 

§248.     Rudolph  of  Hapshirg,    1273-91.     The  Sicilian  Vespers. 

The  German  throne  had  been  for  a  long  time  vacant  when  the  Count  of 
Hi^nrg  became  king  by  the  choice  of  the  more  powerful  princes  of  the 
npire.  He  now  endeavored  to  obtain  the  papal  acknowledgment,  and  took 
the  oath  which  had  been  customary  ever  since  the  time  of  Otho  IV.,  because 
Alphonso  of  Castile,  a  rival  king,  whom  Gregory  X  had  persuaded  to  rc- 
noonoe  all  claims  upon  the  crown,  was  yet  living.  With  the  moderation  of 
I  mind  powerful  in  its  proper  sphere,  Rudolph  abandoned  all  the  rights  of 
the  empire  to  its  Italian  dependencies,  and  confined  his  attention  to  tho 
ertabljshment  of  a  legal  government  in  Germany,  and  to  the  attainment 
of  the  power  which  his  family  needed  for  its  maintenance.  He  therefore 
Mcceeded  in  living  on  terms  of  honorable  peace  with  the  pope,  who  needed 
»  powerful  support  against  the  influence  of  France  in  Lower  Italy,  and  he 
^  opportunity  to  pave  the  way  for  the  future  independence  of  the  empire,  (a) 


«)  GoniK  mrrentcs  des  T«mplera  in  DietM^  Leben  o.  Werke  d.  Tronbad.  Zwick.  1S29.  p.  589. 

^  Hvanbtrtut  de  RomanU  (in  the  service  of  the  pope,)  de  hl^  qaae  tractands  videbaotar  in  Cona 
PB-LogiL  (ir<M«<  YoL  XXIV.  p.  1098&) 

«)  MaHnu$  Samttus^  Secretonim  fidelinm  crnci*  1.  III.  P.  XII.  c  21sa.  (Bonffars  vol.  II.)  Ahul- 
f^  (blnuelf  present.)  AnnaL  Moslem,  vol.  V.  p.  95s». 

^  U«eren,  EntwickL  d.  Folgen  d.  Krcuzz.  £  Europa.  OGtt  ISOS.  (IIi.«t  W.  vol.  II.)  Reffenbogen, 
^iHictibiu  qaoa  hnmanitaA,  libertas,  mercatara  etc,  perceperint  e  bello  sacra  Ainst  1S09. 

A)  Codex  epfatolaria  Rad.  L  ed.  Gerbert^  8.  BlasiL  1722.  t  aux.  Bodmantu,  Lps.  IdOft.    Boehmer, 


270  MEDIAEVAL  CUURCH  UISTOKT.    FEB.  IT.    A.  D.  Ifl6-]51T. 

Clement  IV,  had  reason  to  doubt  the  wisdom  of  his  policy  with  respect  to 
the  Sicilies,  for  instead  of  deriving  any  pecaniary  aid  fh>n]  Charles  of  Ai^oo, 
that  prince  was  continoally  exacting  money  from  him.  {h)  So  intolerable 
were  the  oppressions  of  the  French  in  Sicily  that  even  Gregory  X.  predicted 
that  a  day  of  vengeance  wonld  soon  arrive  against  his  royal  vassal,  (e)  But 
when  Martin  IV,  (1281-86)  a  Frenchman,  and  subservient  to  French  inter- 
ests, was  seated  in  the  papal  chair,  (d)  at  the  ringing  of  the  vesper  bells  on 
the  third  day  in  Easter,  1282,  an  insurrection  broke  forth,  and  every  French- 
man on  the  island  was  slain.  Peter  of  Aragon,  on  account  of  his  marriage 
with  Oonstantia,  the  daughter  of  Manfred,  was  proclaimed  King  of  Sicily,  and 
was  immediately  excommunicated  by  the  pope.  Charles  of  Anjon  retained 
possessi(3n  only  of  Naples,  and  the  i>opes  lost  all  influence  in  Sicily  until  new 
relations  were  formed  with  France  in  the  beginning  of  the  liext  centnij, 
when  a  reconciliation  was  effected,  {e) 

§  224.     The  Hermit  in  the  Papal  Chair,    July  5,—Dfe.  18,  1294. 

Jh^hmer,  Rf'frest.  p.  888.  PtoUmaei  Lue.  (tn  eye-wltntas)  H.  ect  XXIV,  29ml  BajntU.  ad 
ann.  1291.  Jucftffi  Cardtnalit  Carmen  de  vita,  and  de  canonisadfine  CoeL  (Jfwrat  toL  UL  P.  L  pi 
618m.  eS."^)  P^trm  de  Allioco,  Yita  Coel.  (AcU  6S.  MaJ.  toL  IV.  p.  4S8c>— OWmMwC  Opp.  (im- 
tlc)  e<l.  TeUra,  Neap.  IWO.  4.  (Bibl.  PP.  Lugd.  voL  XXV.) 

The  French  influence  in  Naples  had  gained  over  a  party  ampng  the  cardi- 
nals, which  was  opposed  by  another,  embracing  various  shades  of  dbtinction, 
called  the  papal,  the  Italian,  and  the  German.  But  when  neither  of  these 
parties  was  found  strong  enough  to  elect  one  of  its  own  number  to  the  papal 
chair,  at  the  suggestion  of  the  name  of  Peter  de  Murrhane^  a  hermit  and  a 
popular  Haint,  residing  at  Abruzzo,  all  agreed  to  bestow  their  votes  on  him, 
each  party  hoping  to  flnd  in  him  an  instrument  for  its  own  purposes.  He 
assumed  the  name  of  Celestine  F.,  and  never  renounced  his  saintly  poverty 
and  his  former  simplicity  of  life.  But  with  the  exception  of  the  King  ci 
Xai)les,  to  whose  influence  he  surrendered  himself,  and  whose  favorites  he 
ai>pointed  cardinals,  all  parties  soon  perceived  his  utter  unfitness  for  the  office 
of  government.  Hence,  when  he  had  confirmed  the  rigid  regulations  of 
Gregory  X.  with  respect  to  the  limitation  and  seclusion  of  the  conclave,  (a) 
ho  was  induced  by  Cardinal  Cajetanus^  who  acted  in  behalf  of  the  older  car- 
dinals, although  with  the  view  of  himself  becoming  pope,  voluntarily  to 
resign  his  oflSee.  Instead  of  the  solitude  of  the  mountain  for  which  he  had 
longed,  hLs  successor  consigned  him  to  the  solitude  of  a  prison,  in  which  be 
died  (1296).  By  his  third  successor  he  had  assigned  to  him  (1318)  a  place 
among  the  saints,  and  by  Dante  a  place  in  hell.  (&) 


Rep.  p.  SI  an.    PerU  vol.  IV.  p.  SSZssl— Z<  Bret,  do  prud.  Rud.  In  rebus  cum  Caria  peracdi.  T\ibi 

17S8.4 

h)  Marten^  Tlies.  nor.  vol.  II.  p.  174. 179.    c)  &iha  Jfala*pina  VL  4    d)  Bo0hm4r,  Beg.  J 
e)  MUh,  Amari,  la  gucrra  del  Ve»pro  Sicitiano.  Palermo.  1842.  ed.  4.  Fir.  1851. 
a)  Proclaimed  at  Lyons,  1274.    Manal  voL  XXIV.  p.  Slsa.    b)  Inferno  III, 


CHAP.  L    PAPACY,    f  MS.  BONIFACE  TIIL    PHIUP  AUGUSTUS.  271 

§  246.    Boniface  YIIL    Dec.  24,  1294.— Oc^.  11,  1303. 

Pt6L  Luc  II.  ecc  XXIV,  M.  (Comp.  Cod.  Patav.  In  Murat  vol  XI.  p.  1218««.)  For  Hl«t  A 
oii^  docamenUs  (P.  du  Pup)  Illst  da  diff6rend  entre  le  Pape  Boniface  et  Phil,  lo  Bel.  Par.  1650.  t 
SailUt,  Ulst  des  d6niilez  da  P.  BonlC  aveo  Phil.  ed.  3.  Par.  171S.  n.—Pub€U9,  BoniC  et  famllia  Ca- 
Jetanomm.  Bom.  1651.  Totfi;  Storla  di  Bun.  YIIL  e  de*  saol  tempi.  Bom.  1846.— FI  Drumann, 
Qmch.  Bon.  d.  YIIL  KGnipib.  1S&2.  2  Th. 

C^jetanus  of  Anagni,  a  jurist  and  a  priest,  who  had  grown  old  while 
employed  in  the  affairs  of  the  Roman  coart,  ascended  the  papal  chair  nnder 
the  name  of  Boniface  VIII.  This  distinction  he  attained  througli  the  recom- 
mendation of  his  enemy  the  King  of  Naples.  Actuated  by  a  frantic  hatred 
to  the  GhibcUine  party  he  sent  into  banishment  the  powerful  family  of  the 
Colonna  who  now  declared  Celestine^s  resignation  invalid,  and  drove  the 
plough  over  Palestrina  the  town  in  which  they  resided.  He  reproved  Philip 
of  France  for  having  seized  upon  the  property  of  the  Church,  and  for  an 
adulteration  of  the  coin,  and  according  to  a  right  then  conceded  to  the  hier- 
archy, he  proposed  to  act  as  a  mediator  (1205)  in  the  sanguinary  war  between 
that  prince  and  Edward  I.  of  England.  Philip  the  Fair  forbade  his  inter- 
ference, and  when  Bonif&ce  forbade  all  taxation  of  Church  property,  (a)  the 
king  prohibited  auy  exportation  of  the  precious  metals.  That  he  might  not 
lose  all  his  revenues  from  France,  and  as  he  was  already  forsaken  by  a  por- 
tion of  the  rtench  clergy,  the  pope  sought  to  become  reconciled  to  Philip  by 
giving  the  mildest  construction  to  his  own  prohibition.  Both  kings  now  con- 
sented that  he  should  decide  their  difficulties,  not,  however,  as  the  pope,  but 

one  selected  by  the  parties  for  that  special  purpose.  No  sooner,  however, 
his  decision  made  known  in  a  Bull  (June  30,  1298),  than  Philip  refused 
to  comply  with  its  requisitions,  because  it  did  not  properly  respect  tlie  right 
of  prior  possession  against  that  of  recent  conquest.  Reproaches  of  royal 
oppression,  and  papal  treachery  to  the  Church,  were  exchanged  between 
them,  and  the  legate  in  France,  as  a  French  bishop,  was  thrown  into  prison 
for  high  treason.  Angry  edicts  were  proclaimed  by  Boniface  on  the  5th  of 
I>ecember,  1801,  summoning  the  French  prelates  to  Rome  for  the  purpose  of 
reforming  the  king  and  the  empire.  The  king,  whose  ordinary  government 
was  eminently  despotic,  now  appealed  to  his  people,  and  convened  a  general 
Diet  of  his  kingdom.  The  three  estates  were  unanimous  in  maintaining  the 
independence  of  the  French  kingdom  (1302).  An  extract  from  the  papal 
decrees  which  had  been  so  falsified  as  to  make  it  in  the  highest  degree  offen- 
sive to  the  royal  feelings,  declared  every  one  a  heretic  who  did  not  believe 
that  the  king  in  temporal  as  well  as  in  spiritual  matters  was  subject  to  the 
pope.  To  this  the  king  replied  by  declaring  every  one  a  fool  who  did  not 
believe  that  the  King  of  France  was  in  temporal  things  subject  to  no  one.  (b) 
Boniface  now  commenced  a  contest  with  the  whole  French  nation,  and  al- 
though ho  denied  that  he  had  ever  claimed  France  as  a  papal  fief,  he  never- 
theless maintained  that  every  creature,  under  peril  of  his  final  perdition,  was 


«)  Clerlds  laiooe :  Start.  Dicretal,  lib.  8.  tit  28.  c.  a 

h)  Thegenaine:  Aaaculta  fill.    The  q>arloaa:  Deam  time.    BcUUet,  p.  108,111s.    Drumann^ 
T«L  XL  p^  19. 


272  MEDIAEVAL  CHUBCH  HISTORY.    PER.  lY.    A.  D.  1216-3UT. 

bonnd  to  obey  the  Roman  bishop,  (r)  He  then  proceeded  to  ezcommnnioate 
the  king,  who  appealed  once  more  to  a  general  Diet  of  his  empire  (June, 
1808).  Before  that  body  he  had  the  pope  accused  of  the  most  monstrous 
crimes,  and  demanded  that  a  general  council  should  be  summoned  to  adjudi- 
cate upon  them.  The  pope  pronounced  an  interdict  upon  the  whole  of 
France,  abrogated  the  privileges  of  the  universities,  and  bestowed  the  French 
crown  upon  the  Emperor  of  Gennany.  Philip's  chancellor,  William  of  JVV 
garet,  and  Sciarra  Colonna,  the  expelled  cardinal,  surprised  and  imprisoned 
the  pope  (Sept.  7)  in  his  own  city  of  Anagni.  In  the  hands  of  his  enemies 
he  now  resolved  to  die  like  Ilim,  whose  earthly  vicar  he  professed  to  be. 
After  a  confinement  of  three  days  ho  was  liberated  by  hb  own  countrymen, 
but  grief  for  the  dishonor  he  had  suffered  had  broken  his  heart.  It  is  possi- 
ble that  Boniface  thought  more  of  himself  and  of  his  treasures  than  of  the 
general  welfare,  but  he  was  impelled  forward  by  his  idea  of  the  pontificate, 
his  conduct  was  in  the  very  spirit  of  Gregory,  he  only  mistook  in  some  cases 
the  ])roper  hour  for  action,  and  in  general  had  not  observed  the  great  changes 
which  had  taken  place  since  the  time  of  his  predecessor.  Subsequent  ages 
have  held  him  responsible  for  his  misfortunes.  But  kings  had  learned  the 
secret  of  repelling  papal  assumptions,  the  universal  dominion  of  the  hierarchy 
had  been  broken,  and  public  opinion,  expressed  in  powerful  tones,  had  pro- 
nounced its  disapproval  of  all  attempts  to  blend  the  spiritual  with  the  secu- 
lar authority,  {d) 

§  246.     Commencement  of  the  Babylonian  Exile. 

Although  Benedict  XL  (Oct.  22,  1803— June  7,  1804),  was  a  stead&st 
friend  of  his  predecessor,  he  was  compelled  to  yield  to  adverse  circumstanoeB. 
Accordingly  he  availed  himself  of  an  honorable  embassy  from  Philip  to  ob- 
tain a  reconciliation  with  that  monarch,  in  which  all  decrees  against  France 
were  revoked,  so  far  as  appeared  consistent  with  the  honor  of  the  papacy,  (a) 
When  the  conclave  was  assembled  for  the  election  of  his  successor,  it  was 
found  that  the  party  of  Boniface  was  a  complete  match  for  that  of  France, 
but  the  superior  policy  of  the  latter  prevailed,  and  Bertrand  d^Agoust,  Arch- 
bishop of  Bordeaux,  a  creature  of  Boniface,  but  secretly  pledged  to  act  with 
the  French  party,  was  unanimously  elected,  (b)  Cletnent  V,  (June  6,  1806— 
April  20,  1314)  never  crossed  the  Alps,  but  in  the  year  1809  fixed  upon  Avig- 
non as  his  residence.  By  the  appointment  of  numerous  Fr^ich  cardinals  he 
secured  the  election  of  a  successor  of  the  same  political  character  with  him- 
self. These  were  generally  French  court  bishops  who  directed  the  osarpt- 
tions  of  the  hierarchy  only  against  other  nations.  Although  Clement  sub- 
jected the  French  Church  to  the  payment  of  tithes  to  the  king,  repealed 
some  parts  of  Bonifaco^s  bulls,  and  made  others  inapplicable  to  Fhinoe, 
avoided  with  difficulty  a  formal  condemnation  of  Boniface  himself,  and  ven- 

c)  Unam  winctam :  Extrav.  comin.  lib.  I.  tlL  8.  c.  1.    Drumanit,  vol.  IL  p.  578S. 

d)  DanV?^  Purpator.  XVI,  97s«.  XXVII,  TOss.  Aegidiwt  ds  Columiut^  (Archbish.  of  BoiufOi» 
d.  1316)  de  poUstatc  regia  et  pontiflcla.  {GoldagU  Monorchia  8.  R.  Imp.  Fret  1C14.  C  roL  IL  p^  9&) 
Joanneg  de  PurrhtsUs^  (Dominic,  d.  1304.)  Tr.  de  pot  rcgia  et  papalL  (Tb.  p.  10&) 

3)  Raynald  od.  ann.  1804.    Du  Puy,  p.  207aa.       h)  ViUani,  YIII,  SOi 


CHAP.  I.    PAPACr.    i  246.  CLEMENT  V.    $  MT.  JOHN  XXIL  273 

tared  only  in  secret  to  recall  a  compnlsory  public  recommendation  of  the 
French  prince  for  election  to  the  imperial  dignity,  ho  hurled  the  most  terri- 
ble anathemas  (1309)  against  the  republic  of  Venice  for  its  attempt  to  gain 
forcible  possession  of  Ferrara,  and  when  Henry  VII.  of  Luxemburg  went  on 
a  militiry  expedition  to  Rome  he  renewed  all  the  exorbitant  deiimnds  of  his 
predecessors.  Henry  died  in  the  midst  of  his  victories  (1313),  and  it  was  then 
proclaimed  in  tlie  papal  bulls  that  the  pope  was  the  emperor^s  lord  paramount, 

and  consequently  that  when  the  imperial  throne  was  vacant  the  pope  was 

the  imperial  regent  in  Italy,  (c) 

§  247.     Louis  of  Bataria,    1314-47.    Joanna  of  Naples, 

L  Oiiz.  Docc.  In  Olenaddagtr^  SUntogesch,  <1es  rom.  KaLxerth.  1.  IlalAe  dos  14  Jhh.  Frkf.  1755. 
1  Bofhmer^  Rege»tA  Imp.  1814^7.  Frkf  1S80.  4.  &  Addltam  I.  Frkf.  1S41.  4.  Vita  Lud.  IV.  Al- 
htrt  iliv^nii  Lud.  Bavaros,  Jo.  VictorienftU  and  otliers  In  B<)«liiner,  Fonlcs  rer.  Gorm.  vol.  I.  Ihr- 
^tariah  ffohfrnburg^  Lnd.  IV.  defcnsus.  Mon.  IGlSa.  8  vols.  4.  OetcuUl^  Dofenslo  Lud.  IV.  Ingolst. 
mi  i.-ilann€rt,  Ludw.  IV.  Landsh.  1812.    ScldetU  Bio^rr.  v.  K.  Ludw.  Bulz.  1822. 

After  a  long  and  violent  assembly  of  the  French  and  Italian  cardinals, 
John  XXIL  was  presented  to  the  people  as  their  pope  (1316-34).  While  yet 
in  Lyons  he  gave  his  oath  to  the  Italians  that  he  would  never  mount  a  beast 
except  on  his  journey  to  Rome,  and  accordingly  embarked  by  shij)  for  Avig- 
non, and  never  loft  his  palace  there.  In  Germany,  Lo\iU  of  Bavaria  and 
Frckrie  of  Austria  were  contending  for  the  imperial  crown,  and  at  that  time 
it  appeared  to  be  tlie  interest  of  France  to  allow  the  power  of  the  empire  to 
expend  it.«elf  in  these  civil  dissension?.  Hence,  when  Louis  had  made  his 
opponent  a  prisoner  (1322),  and  in  opposition  to  the  summons  tliat  ho  should 
submit  to  the  decision  of  the  pope,  pleaded  that  his  title  to  the  crown  was 
already  complete  by  the  choice  of  the  princes  of  the  empire,  John  simply  re- 
plwdby  a  ban  of  excommunication  and  an  interdict  (1324).  But  even  the 
ptpal  sanction  of  a  breach  of  faith  was  ineffectual  to  make  it  tolerable  to  the 
lojal  spirit  of  the  Germans.  Louis  came  to  an  agreement  with  his  opponent, 
and  after  a  formal  appeal  to  a  general  council  caused  him.self  to  bo  crowned 
emperor  at  Rome,  and  a  pious  mendicant  monk  to  be  placed  in  the  papal 
Amt  (1328).  No  sooner,  however,  was  his  army  withdrawn  from  Italy  tlian 
bii  power  in  that  country  ceased,  the  pope  whom  he  had  set  up  was  sent  to 
Arignon,  and  a  papal  decree  announced  that  Italy  was  for  ever  separated  from 
Gennany.  On  the  one  side  of  the  Alps  the  emperor's,  and  on  the  other  side 
tfee  pope's  extreme  pretensions  to  a  universal  dominion  were  advociited  by 
inflnential  writers,  (a)  By  his  passionate  interference  in  all  kinds  of  theo- 
lopeal  controversy  John  XXIL  gave  occasion  for  the  imputation  that  he  was 
^inself  infected  with  heresy,  (b)  In  his  proud  theocratic  pretensions  the 
Germans  could  perceive  nothing  higher  than  the  instigations  of  France.  The 
interdict,  however,  though  but  partially  carried  into  effect,  was  not  without 

*)  F.  W.  Rtrthoid^  ROmerziig  Ilelnr.  v.  LaUelburg.  KAnlgsb.  153«K  2  vols. 

*)  On  the  Imperial  side  :  Mar»ilin%  of  Padua  and  John  of  Jandun  In  their  principal  Joint  pro- 
^'^'^  alwut  1328,  Defensor  pacts.  {GoldaBti  Monarchia,  vol.  II.  p.  154.)  On  llio  papal  eido:  .ff>- 
T'^'hM  Triumphus^  Samma  do  potest  ecc  ad.  Jo.  Aug.  Vind.*1478.  and  often.  Alvarui  Pelagiun. 
^  pJacto  fccleslaa  L  IL  Ulm.  1474  Ven.  1560.  t 

^)  OuiL  Occam,  Compi  erroram  Joannis  P.  (^Golda$ti  1.  c  vol  IL  p.  057.) 

18 


I 


274  MEDIAEVAL  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  IV.    A.  D.  1216-151T. 

its  inflnence  in  disturbing  the  popular  tranquillity.  A  reconciliation  with  the 
Church  was  sought  for  by  Louis,  and  although  it  was  desired  by  Benedict  XIL 
(1384-42)  no  less  than  by  the  emperor,  it  was  prevented  by  French  inflnenoe. 
This  dependence  of  the  popes  induced  the  imperial  princes  to  form  the  first 
Electoral  Alliance  at  Bense  (July  16,  1888),  and  Louis  announced  that  the 
imperial  dignity  came  directly  from  God  alone,  (e)  But  as  the  emperor  had 
done  violence  to  the  feelings  of  his  people,  sometimes  by  arbitrary  invasions 
of  the  prerogatives  of  the  Church,  and  sometimes  by  pusillanimous  conces- 
sions, Clement  VI.  (1842-62)  succeeded  in  obtaining  five  electoral  votes  in 
favor  of  Charles  IV,  the  son  of  the  King  of  Bohemia  (1346).  But  this  par- 
son-king was  obliged  immediately  to  take  refuge  in  France,  and  did  not  reach 
the  ignominy  of  a  new  election  and  coronation  until  after  the  death  of  I^uis, 
and  at  the  expense  of  the  most  ruinous  sacrifices  (1849).  In  Naples  the  Hun- 
garian prince,  Andreas,  the  husband  of  the  young  royal  heiress,  Joanna^  was 
murdered  (1345).  His  widow,  who  was  soon  after  married  to  her  cousin,  the 
Prince  of  Tarcnto,  was  compelled  to  fly  before  the  vengeance  of  the  Hunga- 
rians to  Avignon.  Clement  VI.,  her  liege  lord  and  her  judge  in  the  place 
of  God,  solemnly  pronounced  the  beautiful  queen  innocent  of  the  murder  of 
her  husband,  and  confirmed  her  recent  marriage.  She,  on  the  other  hand, 
that  she  might  obtain  funds  to  carry  on  a  war  with  tlie  Hungarians,  sold 
Avignon  to  the  papal  see  (1848),  and  after  various  vicissitudes  of  war, 
obtained  permanent  possession  of  her  patrimonial  estates  through  the  media 
tion  of  the  pope. 

§  248.     Close  of  the  Babylonian  Exile. 

In  consequence  of  the  absence  of  the  pope  and  the  weakness  of  the  em- 
peror, in  Italy,  every  city  there  made  eftbrts  to  attain  independence,  and 
whenever  this  was  secured,  innumerable  factions  and  tyrants  commenced  a 
struggle  with  each  other.  The  result  was  that  all  considerate  persons  began 
to  long  for  some  powerful  head  who  could  rule  over  the  whole.  These  de- 
sires, however,  were  not  satisfied  by  Charles  /F.,  whose  expedition  to  Rome 
(1854)  was  welcomed  with  great  enthusiasm  by  the  people,  for  tlie  only 
object  of  that  monarch  was  to  obtain  the  pageant  of  a  coronation.  Innocent 
VI.  (1352-62),  a  prince  well  versed  in  legal  science  and  of  strict  integrity, 
recognized  the  necessity  of  a  reformation,  and  he  even  entered  upon  it  him- 
self by  reducing  the  splendor  of  his  court,  and  attempting  to  appropriate  to 
the  actual  service  of  the  Church  the  treasures  accumulated  from  various 
benefices.  The  estates  of  the  Church  had  been  divided  into  many  indepen- 
dent cities  and  principalities,  or  had  been  taken  possession  of  by  neighboring 
governments.  In  vain  the  popes  resorted  to  terrible  excommunications  to 
frighten  these  ecclesiastical  robbers ;  the  papal  government  was  not  restored 
until  Alhornoz^  the  cardinal  legate  (1863-67),  succeeded  in  raising  a  bold  cru- 
sade on  a  small  scale,  and  brought  into  action  all  the  arts  of  a  skilful  diplomacy. 
The  Romans  had  been  for  a  brief  period  intoxicated  with  the  idea  of  free- 
dom and  universal  dominion,  excited  by  their  tribune  Cola  di  Rienzo^  but 

c)  OUfmchiager^  N.  ML    Boehmery  Reg.  p.  180. 

*  F.  Papeftcordt,  CoU  di  Rienxo  n.  a.  Zeit  Hunk  1841. 


CHAP.  L    PAPACY.    $«48L  INNOCENT  VL    1 249.  THE  SCHISNL  275 

when  they  saw  the  eterD&l  city  becomiDg  almost  desolate  in  coDsequcnce  of 
the  ahsence  of  the  pope,  all,  especially  those  to  whom  the  higher  object  of 
the  papacy  was  dear,  became  anxious  for  his  return.  Urban  V,  (1362-70), 
in  opposition  to  the  wishes  of  his  cardinals  and  the  king  of  France,  at  last 
returned  to  Rome  (1867).  He  was  soon,  however,  compelled  to  return 
to  Avignon  by  the  unsettled  condition  of  affairs  in  Italy.  Gregory  XL 
(1370-78)  once  more  yielded  to  the  solicitations  of  his  Italian  subjects,  and 
was  carried  back  by  the  Romans  in  triumph  (1877).  Yet  the  cities  of  the 
Ecclesiastical  States  were  not  unmindful  of  their  independence,  for  they  were 
careful  to  intimate  that  aU  regard  for  religion  must  be  laid  aside  when  it  be- 
comes hostile  to  freedom,  and  that  nothing  but  death  could  render  the  resi- 
dence of  the  pope  in  Italy  absolutely  certain. 

§  249.     The  Schism. 

I.  Grig.  Dooc  in  Itaynnld.  Balua.  and  In  Bulaei  Hist  Univ.  Paris,  vol.  IV.  Theodoricus  da 
Kiem^  de  scbisinate  inter  Papas  et  Antipapas  (till  1410.)  L  III.  et  nemos  unionis.  Bas.  1500.  t 
ktp  1609. 

XL  DnPuy,  Hist  da  ecliiKtne  137&-1423.  Par.  1654.  and  often.  Jlaimbourg^  IILst  du  grand 
KhisiiM  d'ooddant  Par.  167S.  Ueberei  1792. 

The  election  of  an  Italian  pope  was  at  last  obtained  by  the  persevering 
olwtinacy  of  the  Roman  people.  The  Archbishop  of  Ban,  Urban  VI. 
(1878-89),  a  Neapolitan,  was  favorably  inclined  toward  the  people,  though 
toward  the  cardinals,  whose  opposition  to  himself  he  well  knew,  he  evinced 
the  natural  severity  of  his  character.  The  twelve  cardinals  from  beyond  the 
Alps  therefore  fled  to  Anagni,  hired  a  band  of  condottieri,  declared  the  elcc- 
tioQ  of  Urban  invalid  because  under  constraint,  drew  three  Italian  cardinals  by 
trtfol  promises  into  their  conclave  at  Fondi,  and  chose  Cardinal  Robert  of 
Geneva  for  their  pope,  under  the  name  of  Clement  VIL  (1378-94).  IIo  took 
«p  his  residence  at  Avignon,  and  through  the  influence  of  France  lie  was 
gndoally  acknowledged  in  the  Spanish  peninsula,  in  Scotland,  Savoy  and 
L)rniiDe,  and  was  regarded  as  the  proper  successor  of  the  French  popes.  In 
opposition  to  Joanna  of  Kaples,  who  had  likewise  declared  in  favor  of  Cle- 
ment, Urban  stirred  up  Charles  of  Durazzo,  the  heir-apparent  to  her  throne, 
ttd  reealled  the  memory  of  her  deed  of  blood.  The  queen  then  adopted  the 
French  prince  Louis  of  Ai\jou,  whom  Clement  invested  with  the  kingdom  of 
Naples,  and  sustained  in  the  expenses  of  his  war.  Charles  having  seized 
opoQ  the  person  of  Joanna,  had  her  put  to  death  in  prison,  and  maintained 
poeBesrion  of  Naples.  But  Urban  soon  after  became  displeased  with  him 
because  he  refused  to  bestow  Capua  on  a  nephew  of  the  pope,  in  considera- 
tion of  the  assistance  he  had  received,  excommunicated  him,  was  besieged  by 
lum  in  Nocera,  and  was  finally  compelled  to  take  refuge  in  Genoa.  In  his 
%ht  through  the  midst  of  his  enemies  he  had  five  cardinals  bound  and  cou- 
^tyed  with  him  to  Genoa,  where  they  were  put  to  death.  Both  popos  were 
^vronnded  by  a  train  of  cardinals,  so  that  the  decease  of  both  would  have 
^  effect  in  diminishing  the  achism.  To  sustain  the  expenses  of  tlio  war  be- 
^6en  two  popes  and  of  two  distinct  papal  courts,  it  was  necessary  to  devise 
^^  methods  of  extortion  by  which  every  thing  on  earth  and  in  heaven  was 
P<it  up  for  sale.    Each  pope  was  under  the  other^s  ban,  the  people  were 


276  MEDIAEVAL  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  IV.    A.  D.  1216-1617. 

necessarily  the  only  arbitrators  of  tliis  controversy,  and  the  organs  of  tho 
popular  will  were  those  who  represented  the  interests  of  science.  The  first 
actual  movement  for  the  attainment  of  peace  was  made  by  the  University  of 
Paris.  The  only  practicable  method  by  which  this  strife  could  be  composed 
seemed  to  be  tho  simultaneous  abdication  of  both  competitors.  Peter  de 
Luna,  under  the  name  of  Benedict  XI  11.^  was  then  reigning  (after  1394)  in 
Avignon,  and  Angelo  Corrario,  under  that  of  Gregory  XII,^  in  Rome  (after 
1406).  On  their  election  both  had  promised  to  make  the  sacrifice  which  the 
interests  of  the  Church  required,  but  both,  on  various  pretext*^,  refused  to 
abide  by  their  engagements.  Benedict  was  then  abandoned  by  the  French, 
aad  fled  into  Spain.  Both  popes  were  finally  forsaken  by  their  cardinals, 
who,  appealing  to  Ciirist  himself,  a  general  council  and  a  future  pope,  assem- 
bled at  Leghorn  (1408). 

§  250.     The  Council  of  Pisa,     March  25-Au(j.  7,  1409. 

I.  Act«  of  Council,  111  3fiiimi  vol.  XXVIs,  Theod.  de  Kiem^  do  scliism.  Ill,  SSm.  [London^ 
pp.  4SS-492.] 

H.  Lenfaut,  IIi*L  du  Cone,  do  Pise.  Amst.  1724.  1727.  2  vols.  4.  J.  IT.  r.  Wess^uherg,  diegros- 
sen  KVorsnmnil.  des  15.  u.  10.  Jalirh.  (C<>n8t.  1S40.  4  vols.)  vol  II.  p.  4Ss8w  Comp.  IlefeU^  krtt. 
Belcucht.  Tub.  1S41. 

There  appeared  to  bo  no  way  in  which  this  struggle  between  the  rival 
claimants  of  the  papal  dignity  could  be  legally  terminated,  but  by  the  repre- 
sentatives of  the  whole  Cliurch,  in  whom  the  highest  degree  of  power  could 
be  combined.  The  cardinals  now  laid  aside  their  divisions,  and  by  the  advice 
of  the  Universities,  convoked  a  general  Council  at  Pirn,  The  priesthood 
was  represented  by  twenty-four  cardinals  and  two  hundred  bishops,  present 
either  in  person  or  by  proctors ;  the  monastic  orders  by  three  hundred  ab- 
bots ;  scientific  bodies  by  deputies  from  the  universities,  one  hundred  and 
twenty  masters  in  theology,  and  three  hundred  graduates  of  the  Roman  and 
canonical  law ;  and  the  state  especially  by  the  envoys  of  France  and  Eng- 
land. In  opposition  to  the  protests  of  the  two  popes,  Rupert,  Emperor  of 
Germany,  and  Ladislaus,  King  of  Naples,  the  council  confirmed  the  principle* 
defended  by  Gerson^  Chancellor  of  Paris,  afiirming  that  the  power  with 
which  Christ  invested  the  Church  was  independent  of  the  pope.  Both  Bene- 
dict and  Gregory  were  then  summoned  before  the  council,  and  after  a  formal 
trial  were  deposed  for  contumacy  and  the  violation  of  their  engagements. 
The  representatives  of  the  Church,  however,  well  knew  that  they  could 
hope  for  no  influence  or  success  unless  they  removed  tho  innumerable 
abuses  then  prevalent.  The  cardinals  therefore  bound  themselves  by  an 
oath,  that  whoever  should  be  elected  from  their  number,  should  never  dis- 
solve the  council  until  it  had  completed  the  work  of  reformation  in  the  head 
and  members  of  the  Church.  Peter  of  Candia,  an  aged  and  quiet  man  who 
afterwards  bore  the  name  of  Alexander  F.,  was  made  choice  of,  and  that  he 
might  make  those  preparations  which  he  alleged  to  be  necessary,  he  imme- 
diately postponed  the  work  of  reformation  to  a  council  which  he  promised 
to  convene  in  three  years  from  that  date.    By  his  unrestrained  liberality  the 

*  Tr.  de  aniUte  Ecc  and  Libellus  de  auferibilitate  papae  ab  Ecc  (0pp.  vol  XL  P.  L) 


CHAP.  I.  PAPACY.  S  251.  COUNCIL  OF  CONSTANCE.         277 

resources  of  the  Church  were  in  a  short  time  squandered.  Benedict  still 
maintained  his  claims  in  Spain  and  Scotland,  and  Gregory  was  acknowledged 
by  Kupert  and  Ladislaus.  Christendom  beheld  with  amazement  three  popes 
within  its  bounds,  and  all  its  abuses  continued  without  restraint. 

§  251.     The  Council  of  Constance.     Not.  5,  l^U-Ajyril  22,  U18. 

I.  Kesiiectin^  John  XXIIL,  after  Platina  his  secretary,  consult  Th^od.  d€  Xiem,  Vita  Jo.  {Ilardt^ 
C-onc.  C<in*L  \v\.  II.  P.  XV.  p.  885.)  Invectlva  in  .llffugifntem  a  Con>t.  Couc.  Ja  (76.  P.  XIV.  p. 
294.)  and  A  ^ re<<'7i iM,  Cominentar.  (Jfitrat.  vol.  XIX.  p.  9278s.)— MHgnum  occum.  Constantienso 
Omc  oil.  IFerm.  ron  der  llardt^  FrcC  ct  Lps.  697»*.  7  vols.  f.  Theod.  Vri*^  an  Augmtlnlan  of  Oana- 
bnurk,  dv  coii5olat1«)ne  Ecc.  (al.s)  II  1st  du  Cone  Const,  in  Ifardt^  vol.  I.  p.  1.) 

II.  I^n/uni^  III»L  du  Cone,  de  0>n<  AinsL  (171 1.)  1727.  2  vols.  4.  Bourgeoi9  da  ChanUuet, 
aoavelle  HK  da  Cone,  de  Const.  Par.  1718.  4.  lioyko^  Ge»ch.  d.  KVors.  zu  K<M<tnltz.  Vlen.  »t 
Prapae.  17>2«.  4  voK  (1st  k.  2d  vols.  2<1  cd.  1796.)  Asvhhach,  Lebon  K.  Sljfisin.  (according  to  Wln- 
<Wek.)  Frkt  (ISSSs.)  vol.  II.  We^Hfnhtfg  vol.  II.  p.  C9!«s.  [Landon,  pp.  liiO-162.  I*.  JSonntchow, 
(1 30(1)  on  Gcreon,  John  Ilnaa,  and  the  Council  of  Ck>nstunce,  republ.  in  1S58.  Par.] 

Cossa,  the  cardinal  legate,  who  displayed  great  talents  in  the  management 
of  secular  affairs,  but  was  totally  destitute  of  all  spiritual  character,  had 
Alexander  V.  brought  to  Bologna,  that  he  might  close  his  days  in  that  city 
(1410).  Having  e.xpelled  the  Visconti  from  Bologna,  Cossa  ruled  without 
restraint  as  the  tyrant  of  that  city,  and  the  cardinals  were  obliged  to  make 
choice  of  him  as  the  successor  in  tlie  papal  chair.  He  assumed  the  name  of 
John  XXIIL,  and  was  soon  driven  from  the  Ecclesiastical  States  in  a  war 
with  ladislaus.  The  emperor  Siffi'<mund  refused  to  afford  him  any  assistance 
nnU'ss  he  would  appoint  some  place  beyond  the  Alps  in  which  a  council 
?honM  be  Assembled  for  the  removal  of  the  schism,  and  the  accomplishment 
of  the  ecclcsia<?tical  reformation  demanded  by  the  people.  The  place  agreed 
npon  by  the  pope  and  the  emperor  was  Constance,  and  the  council  was  sum- 
Dwned  to  convene  on  the  first  of  November.  Full  of  anxiety  and  perplexed 
with  conflicting  views,  John  XXIII.  repaired  to  Constance  on  the  29th  Oct., 
U14.  Besides  the  representatives  of  the  clergy,  a  great  multitude  of  secu- 
lar lords  came  together  there,  presenting  an  array  of  all  the  glory  of  Europe. 
At  the  head  of  the  civil  powers  stood  the  emperor  with  the  sincere  intention 
of  effecting  the  reformation  of  the  Church.  Gerson  and  the  Cardinal  Peter 
iAiUy  were  the  principal  lenders  of  the  reforming  party.  Their  superior 
power  in  the  assembly  was  evinced  and  increased  by  the  arrangement  that 
the  voting  should  take  place  by  nations.  This  rule  was  adopted  on  account 
of  the  numerical  majority  of  Italian  prelates,  and  even  in  the  preliminary 
meetings  business  had  been  transacted  in  separate  sections  under  the  name 
<rf  the  German,  the  Italian,  the  French,  the  English,  and,  after  the  abnn- 
<ioninentof  Benedict,  the  Spanish  nations.  (</)  The  cardinals  constituted  a 
tt»Dege  by  themselves,  with  no  deflned  prerogatives.  Within  their  resjKictive 
^^ns,  the  prelates,  it  is  true,  maintained  tliat  their  votes  were  decisive  of 
*U  questions  which  came  before  them,  but  they  were  generally  swayed  by 
^«  influence  of  the  princes  and  doctors.  Tlicre  were  only  a  few  public  ses- 
■ons  in  which  all  these  nations  were  united  in  one  body,  and  even  in  these 
^cre  were  seldom  any  debates,  but  simply  solemn  communications  and  pro- 

a)  UardU  roL  XL  p.  224ae. 


278  MEDIAEVAL  CHUBCH  HISTOKT.    PEB.  IV.    A.  D.  1216-1517. 

clamations  of  decisions  elsewhere  formed.  The  majority  finally  announced, 
that  in  their  opinion  the  schism  could  never  be  effectually  healed  but  by  the 
simultaneous  abdication  of  each  of  the  three  popes,  and  the  general  voice 
became  more  and  more  decided  in  its  demands  for  the  impeachment  of  John 
XXni.,  on  account  of  his  dissolute  course  of  life.  John  then  ai)peared  will- 
ing to  resign  the  tiara,  but  soon  after,  in  spite  of  his  oath  to  the  contrary, 
with  tlie  aid  of  Frederic  of  Austria,  he  made  his  escape  (March  20,  1415)  to 
Schaffhausen.  lie  afterwards  removed  still  farther  down  the  Rhine,  and 
revoked  all  his  promises  on  the  ground  that  they  were  given  under  con- 
straint. After  a  brief  suspense  the  council  declared  itself  independent  of  all 
popes,  and  superior  to  them,  (b)  The  trial  of  John  XXIII.  was  regularly 
carried  forward,  he  was  proved  guilty  of  a  long  catalogue  of  crimes,  sus- 
pended from  his  dignities,  after  the  submission  of  Austria  imprisoned,  and  on 
the  29tli  of  May  finally  deposed.  Gregory  also  resigned,  but  on  honorable 
terms  (d.  1417).  After  long  and  fruitless  negotiations,  Benedict  was  gene- 
rally deserted  by  his  friends,  and  deposed  by  tlio  council  as  a  heretic  with 
respect  to  the  article  asserting  that  there  is  only  one  Catholic  Church  (July 
26,  1417).  With  as  much  expedition  as  possible  a  new  papal  election  was 
now  held.  In  vain  did  the  German  nation  urge  that  the  reformation  of  the 
head  and  members  of  the  Church  should  first  be  completed ;  they  were  over- 
ruled by  those  who  dreaded  the  predominance  of  an  ultra-liberal  party,  if 
the  Church  should  continue  without  a  head.  Six  deputies  from  each  nation 
were  added  to  the  twenty-three  cardinals  in  the  conclave,  and  on  Nov.  11, 
Otho  Colonna  was  elected  pope,  under  the  name  of  Martin  V.  lie  had  pre- 
viously been  regarded  as  a  courteous,  skilful,  and  moderate  man,  and  he  now 
know  well  how  to  thwart  the  general  demands  for  a  reformation  by  separate 
treaties,  conceding  some  privileges  as  to  ecclesiastical  ofiSces  to  particular  na- 
tions, and  some  claims  of  the  papal  chancery.  The  patience  of  the  council 
was  completely  exhausted.  "With  great  pomp,  on  the  16th  May,  1418,  the 
pope  took  his  departure,  and  the  baffled  hopes  of  such  as  longed  for  reforma- 
tion were  now  turned  to  a  future  general  council  promised  in  five  years 
from  that  time. 

§  252.    Martin  V,    Nov.  11,  Ull-Feb.  20,  1481. 

The  Concordat  which  Martin  proposed  to  the  French  nation  was  rejected 
by  the  Parliament  (1418),  and  all  remittances  of  money  to  Rome  for  crimi- 
nal trials  and  ecclesiastical  benefices  were  once  more  forbidden.  But  in 
spite  of  the  protests  of  the  Parliament,  the  king  was  induced  by  court 
intrigues  to  effect  an  acceptance  and  a  partial  introduction  of  the  Concordat 
(1424).  The  activity  and  caution  of  the  pope  was  also  sometimeB  sucoeasful 
in  renewing  all  the  ecclesiastical  claims  and  pecuniary  extortions  which  bad 
formerly  prevailed.  Cossa,  who  had  beguUed  his  imprisonment  in  Heidel- 
berg by  writing  verses  on  the  fickleness  of  fortune,  met  his  sucoeesor  at  Flor- 
ence, sued  for  clemency,  and  obtained  peace  and  honor  for  the  remainder  of 
his  life.    In  consequence  of  a  misunderstanding  between  Martin  and  the  King 

I)  Hardt,  toL  IL  p.  860m.  988B. 


CHAP.  L    PAFACY.    $252.  HABTIN  Y.    f  258.  EUGENIUS  YL  279 

of  Angon,  Peter  of  Luna  appeared  once  more  on  tlie  public  stage  (d.  1424), 

and  it  was  not  until  his  second  successor  that  this  papacy  at  Peniscola  was 

Ivought  to  an  end.    Martin  was  obliged  to  tarry  for  a  long  time  among  the 

proud  merchants  of  Florence,  before  he  could  obtain  possession  of  the  cities 

cf  the  Ecclesiastical  States  from  the  hands  of  freemen,  and  from  tyrants. 

He  finaUy  became  master  of  Rome  (Sept.  20,  1420),  and  re-established  the 

government  and  the  churches  which  had  so  long  been  suffered  to  decay.   The 

synods  he  convened  at  Pavia  and  Siena  found  a  reasonable  excuse  in  the 

imall  number  of  prelates  assembled  to  postpone  the  reformation  to  a  still 

liter  period.    But  public  sentiment  was  so  powerful,  and  the  necessity  of 

some  assistance  against  the  Ilussites  had  become  so  urgent,  that  he  was  finally 

eompelled  to  sunmion  the  promised  general  council  at  the  imperial  city  of 

Bde,  in  March,  1431. 

§  253.     The  Council  of  Basle.     1481-1443.  (1449.) 

L  Acts  of  Conncil  in  Mdtui  toL  XXIX.-XXXL  and  WUrdttoHn,  Subsidia  diplom.  Ileldelb. 
ITik  ToL  Yllf.  LX.  [Lafuion't  Manual  of  Coancila,  p^  56-74.]  Aeneas  8ylv.  Gommtr.  do  gcstia 
Bm,  Cone  (14S9.)  L  IL  (Orthuini  Graiii  Fascia  rerum  expetend.  ac  fUgi«nd.  Col.  1535i  t)  and 
•ftea.  (Cofl)[jL  Hum  in  d.  Stud.  u.  Krit  1843.  H.  a)  Augtutini  Patricii  Summa  Goncilior.  Basil., 
FlorwUnl,  etc.  (ffankem.  Cone,  germ.  vol.  V.  p.  774.)  Vit*  EugeniL  (Balut.  MisceU.  L  VIL) 

IL  ItkkerU  VLisX.  Cone  gen.  Col  16S1.  4. 1  III.  pc  20s8.     WeMenberg,  voL  IL  p.  271w. 

Eugenius  VI.  (1431-47),  in  compliance  with  a  promise  made  at  his  elec- 
tion, confirmed  the  call  which  his  predecessor  had  issued  for  a  general  eccle- 
ustical  council.  This  assembly  gradually  convened  in  Basle,  and  immediately 
ttnonnced  that  the  extennination  of  heretics  and  the  purification  of  the 
Lod^s  vineyard,  which  in  the  call  had  been  proposed  as  the  object  of  the 
coQDdl,  had  reference  to  the  reconciliation  of  the  Hussites  and  the  removal 
of  abases  from  the  Church.  Tliis  announcement  was  scarcely  made  before 
the  po[)e  perceived  the  designs  of  the  council,  and  began  to  dread  the  influ- 
eDoe  of  its  independent  spirit  among  a  free  people,  and  on  the  confines  of 
tlu:ee  great  nations.  Ue  therefore  hastened  to  give  directions  that  it  should 
mourn  to  meet  in  his  own  city  of  Bologna,  In  this,  however,  he  was  op- 
posed with  the  earnest  remonstrances  of  his  own  legate,  the  Cardinal 
Mian,  (a)  The  council  solemnly  re-aflSrmed  the  decrees  of  its  predecessor 
It  Constance  respecting  the  independence  and  supremacy  of  a  general  coun- 
cil of  the  Church  while  engaged  in  matters  of  faith,  schism,  and  reformation. 
The  po])e  himself  was  cited  before  it  to  answer  for  his  conduct.  Pressed  as 
he  then  was  by  disturbances  among  the  Roman  people,  Eugenius  sought  to 
heeome  reconciled  with  the  synod,  and  after  acknowledging  its  independence, 
hb  legates  were  allowed  to  preside  over  it  (April  2G,  1434).  (b)  The  assem- 
hlf  having  been  increased  by  the  presence  of  many  deputies  of  chapters  and 
penons  belonging  to  the  lower  clergy,  now  proceeded  to  set  forth  a  strict 
^rder  of  business.  To  prepare  all  its  decrees,  it  resolved  itself  into  four 
^tpntations,  each  of  which  was  composed  of  persons  from  all  the  Ecclesias- 


a)  Raynald,  ad  ann.  1481.  N.  22.    Giren  in  fbll  in  the  Fascic.  rer.  expetend.  et  (hgiend.  CoL 
UB&£278a. 
h)  Jfanti  ToL  XXIX.  p.  90.  comp.  409.    [Waddingion  Ecc  Hist  Chap.  XXIY.] 


280  MEDIAEVAL  CHCBCH  HISTORY.    PER.  lY.    A.  D.  121ft.l5lT. 

ticol  states,  (r)    Every  thing  which  could  bo  censored  as  an  abnse  in  the 
Church  by  the  clergy  and  prelates  was  brought  forward.    The  papal  court 
was  in  many  respects  reduced,  significant  references  were  made  to  the  cus- 
toms of  the  primitive  Church,  the  revenues  of  the  pope  from  countries  be- 
yond the  Alps,  and  his  power  of  bestowing  benefices  there,  were  consider- 
ably reduced,  the  illegal  transfer  of  ecclesiastical  trials  to  Rome  was  forbidden, 
the  pope  was  solemnly  admonished  for  his  disregard  of  these  decrees,  and  in 
a  great  variety  of  ways  even  the  administration  of  ecclesiastical  affairs  was 
interfered  with.    Wlien  Eugenius  heard  of  this,  ho  adjourned  the  council 
after  its  twenty-sixth  session  to  Ferrara  (Sept.  18,  1487),  and  subsequently 
to  Florence,    At  the  council  which  he  convened  at  the  latter  place  he  excom- 
municated the  rebellious  assembly  at  Basle.    But  this  latter  body  instituted 
legal  proceedings  against  him,  the  issue  of  which  was  that  Eugenius  was  de- 
posed (June  25,  1489)  for  simony,  heresy,  and  disturbance  of  the  public 
peace.    But  the  greater  part  of  the  prelates  had  by  this  time  either  with- 
drawn, or  had  gone  over  to  the  council  at  Florence.    Allemaiul^  Archbishop 
of  Aries,  a  man  of  eminent  piety  but  devoted  to  the  principles  of  liberty, 
being  the  only  cardinal  now  left,  presided  over  the  assembly,  and  the  places 
of  the  bishops  were  occupied  by  doctors  and  the  pastors  of  churchej*.    That 
they  might  have  a  powerful  protector  near,  Amadeus,  Duke  of  Savoy,  who 
uftcr  a  long  and  glorious  reign  had  transferred  his  territories  to  his  son,  and 
was  then  peaceably  living  f\&  a  pious  hermit  by  the  lake  of  Geneva,  was 
elected  pope  by  a  committee  appointed  for  that  puri)ose  by  the  council  (Oct. 
30,  1489).    lie  assumed  the  name  of  Fdix  K,  but  his  authority  was  acknowl- 
edged only  by  his  former  subjects',  the  Kings  of  Aragon  and  Hungary,  a 
few  German  princes,  the  Swiss  confederacy,  and  the  greater  part  of  the  uni- 
versities.   But  the  voice  of  the  people,  which  had  hitherto  been  the  princi- 
pal support  of  the  council,  disapproved  of  the  rashness  of  a  proceeding  which 
had  no  means  provided  for  its  support,  and  threatened  the  Church  with  a 
new  schism.    The  council  was  now  placed  in  the  position  of  a  violent  fac- 
tion, compelled  to  make  concessions  inconsistent  with  its  principles  to  increase 
or  confirm  its  party,  {d)    The  imperial  states  observed  a  careful  neutrality 
between  the  pope  and  the  council,  but  at  a  Diet  convened  at  Men  tz  (March 
26,  1439),  they  accepted  the  decrees  of  reformation  which  had  been  passed 
at  Basle.    Yet  when  Frederic  III.  of  Austria,  a  well-disposed  man,  but  pos- 
sessed of  neither  inclination  nor  ability  to  carry  forward  the  principles  of  lib- 
erty, or  any  thing  else  of  an  elevated  character,  was  raised  to  the  imperial 
throne,  and  Aeneas  Sylcins  of  Piccoloniini,  the  shrewd  and  enthusiastic 
secretary  and  historian  of  the  council,  found  it  for  his  interest  to  enter  first 
into  the  service  of  the  emperor,  and  then  of  the  pope,  Eugenius  was  induced, 
in  consideration  of  his  recognition  as  pope,  to  withdraw  his  decree  of  depo- 
rition  against  the  Electors  of  Treves  and  Cologne,  and  conditionally  to  con- 
cede that  the  decrees  of  the  Council  of  Basle  might  bo  enforced  in  Germany 
(Feb.  5,  7, 1447).  {e)    But  the  same  Aeneas  Sylvius  who  had  obtained  these 


e)  JTcMtl  ToL  XXIX.  p.  877. 
d)  Mamd  ToL  XXXL  p.  802. 
i\  Oooeocdata  Prindpnin.  Decrees  at  Mentz,  In  Uoriat^  Concordats  Nat  Genn.  Fret  et  Lp&  ed. 


CHAP.  L    PAPACY.    $  258L  BA3LK    $  2M  NICHOLAS  Y.  28 1 

conoesfiions,  subsequently  induced  Nicholas  V.,  by  a  separate  agreement  with 
the  emperor  at  Vienna  (Feb.  17,  1448),  craftily  to  steal  away  from  the  Ger- 
man Church  nearly  aU  the  privileges  thus  secured.  This  agreement  finally 
became  possessed  of  imperial  authority  by  distinct  contracts  with  individual 
princes  and  bishops,  under  the  name  of  the  Concordat  of  Ast'kf/ft'tnhurg,  (/) 
On  the  other  hand,  France  had  on  the  whole  faithfully  adhered  to  Eugenius, 
but  in  the  Pragmatic  Sanction  passed  at  Bourgeit  (1438),  it  had  received  the 
decrees  of  Basle  as  far  as  they  were  subservient  to  the  independence  of  the 
Oallican  Church,  {g)  This  ecclesiastical  assembly  at  Basle  having  been  grad- 
ually abandoned  by  the  Church,  by  its  own  pope,  and  finally  by  its  own 
members,  closed  its  sessions  after  1443  without  a  formal  adjournment.  Felix 
resigned  his  precarious  dignities  (1449),  in  an  honorable  compact  with 
ITicholas. 

§  254.     The  Popes  until  the  End  of  the  Fifteenth  Century. 

Platina,  from  Sixtiis  IV.  till  Plas  V.,  continued  generally  according  to  good  authorities  by  the 
Augastlnian  Omi/rio  Pantiui  (d  15(J8.)  Von.  1562.  4.  and  ofl«?n,  especially  Yen.  1703.  Stepkanu9 
J^fmura,  Chancellor  of  the  city  of  llonio  ab<mt  1494,  Diurium  Romanae  Urbis  1294-1494.  {Eccard 
▼ol  IL  p.  1S63.     JIuratoH,  with  omissions,  vol.  III.  P.  II.  p.  1109.) 

Nicholas  v.  (1447-55,  Thomas  of  Sarzana),  notwithstanding  his  hasty 
temper,  by  the  mildness  and  equity  of  his  government  restored  once  more 
the  glory  of  the  papacy.  Himself  a  man  of  extensive  erudition,  he  was 
always  liberal  to  literary  men,  and  to  the  poor,  llis  last  years  were  embit- 
tered by  his  grief  respecting  Constantinople,  {a)  Calixtus  III,  (14o5-68, 
Borgia)  armed  on  his  own  account  a  victorious  army  against  the  Turks,  and 
spared  no  pains  to  secure  the  throne  of  Naples  to  his  nepotes.  ili)  Aeneas 
Sykiui  was  in  natural  talents  and  in  learning  among  the  very  first  men  of 
kis  age,  and  at  the  expense  of  his  character  succeeded  in  attaining  the  object 
of  his  ambition.  Under  the  namo  o(  Pi  its  IT.  (1458-64)  he  vainly  endeav- 
ored to  cast  obloquy  on  the  liberal  tendencies  and  efifbrts  of  his  earlier  years, 
to  wrest  the  Pragmatic  Sanction  from  the  hands  of  the  Frencli,  and  to  place 
bimself  when,  old  and  sick  at  the  head  of  a  crusade  against  the  Turks.  lie 
was  not  a  general  apostate  from  his  principles ;  his  youthful  sins  were  com- 
inilted  in  his  youthful  dreams,  but  his  whole  career  as  a  Roman  pontiff  has 
kftua  no  trace  of  its  influence,  (c)    Paul  II,  (14G4-71,  Barbo),  though  an 

tlTTSiToL  I.    Tlio  foor  bulls  of  Enpenlus  are  in  C.  W.  Kovh,  Sanctio  pragin.  Germ,  ill.  Argent 
l»9.i    SylL  docnm.  p.  iJ^Sss.     C'omp.  RaynaJd.  ad  ann.  1447.  N.  7. 

/)  All  the  -Vrchivcs  of  tho  Diet  of  Mcntz  are  in  Wurdttcein,  Subsid.  dlpU.m.  vol.  IX.  N.  9.  p. 
•'^  All  the  Ar<*hi%es  of  the  Dift  of  Vii-nna  arc  in  Koch^  1.  c  p.  SOJps.  On  the  qnef>ti(»n  wjiether 
'^  ilccTees  of  Ba!>1o  were  abrojrated  witlj  re*i»ect  to  Gennany,  we  SjtittUr,  Gesc'h.  d.  Fundamcn- 
*»^  d.  deutschliath.  K.  (Gott  hi:*t  Max.  vol.  I.  pt.  2s.  vol.  IV.  pt  1.)  On  the  other  bide,  see  Koch, 
>.M«.    Tebcr  d.  Fundamentalgcs.  d.  deutschkath.  K.  Frkt  u.  Lj*.  1700. 

9)  Hist  de  la  pragm.  »anction.  (Ttaitez  do  droits  et  libcrtez  do  I'Egl.  Gall.  Par.  1781.  £  As  an 
"W««lU  to  the  l»t  vol.  of  P.  Pithou  or  Du  PuU) 

«)  L  Vita  Nic.  by  his  Secretary,  Oianezzo  MuMtti  {Jfuraiori  vol.  III.  P.  II.  p.  Ol^'i.)— II.  Dorih 
^^*>^  Vita  Nic.  Rom.  1742.  4.    Jogtmann,  Geach.  d.  fr.  Kun»te  u.  Wiss.  in  Ital.  vol.  111.  P.  & 

t)  ^>inttori  ToL  II L  P.  II.  p.  »61m. 

«)  I.  0pp.  (hist,  geogr.,  rhet)  Bas.  1551.  t  and  often.  Epp.  Nor.  14S1.  and  often.  Oratt  ed. 
^''«*»,  Uc,  1755.  4  His  life  by  his  admirers  Ptatina,  Campani  {Mural,  vol.  III.  P.  II.  p.  967.) 
'"d  bf  himself  in  the  name  of  hia  Secretary,  Gobellini  Commentr.  rerum.  memor.  qnae  temp.  Pii 


282  MEDIAEVAL  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  lY.    A.  D.  1216-1017. 

enemy  to  all  the  partisans  and  policy  of  his  predecessor,  did  not  disturb  the 
tranquillity  of  Italy.  He  was  avaricious,  but  it  was  that  he  might  spend 
what  he  amassed  in  pomp  and  prodigality,  a  persecutor  of  science  on  account 
of  what  he  regarded  as  its  heathenish  tendencies,  tender-hearted  and  easily 
moved  to  tears,  a  fortunate  rather  than  a  holy  father,  and  one  who  regarded 
his  own  arbitrary  purposes  as  his  supreme  law.  (</)  Sixtns  IV,  (1471-64, 
della  Rovera),  a  learned  Franciscan  general,  who  had  been  implicated  in  the 
conspiracy  of  the  Pazzi,  ventured  to  issue  sentence  of  banishment  against 
Lorenzo  Medici  for  escaping  the  daggers  of  the  conspirators.  His  interdicts 
were  disregarded  by  the  Florentines  and  Venetians.  Rome  was  much  em- 
bellished by  him,  but  the  Church  was  sold  and  Italy  filled  with  blood  that  he 
might  acquire  principalities  for  his  nepotes  or  sons,  (e)  Innocent  VIIL 
(1484-92,  Cybo)  commenced  his  reign  with  the  violation  of  the  stipulaticms 
he  had  made  at  his  election.  To  obtain  the  rents  which  he  claimed  from 
Naples,  then  in  league  with  his  seditions  barons,  he  prosecuted  against  it  a 
disgraceful  war,  which  both  parties  were  finally  willing  to  conclude  with  an 
honorable  i>eace,  from  a  common  fear  of  the  French.  In  the  very  act  of  call- 
ing upon  Christendom  to  embark  in  a  war  with  its  hereditary  enemies,  he 
sold  himself  to  the  Sultan  Biyazet  to  become  a  jailer  for  that  monarch. 
While  Rome  was  distracted  by  the  factious  struggles  of  the  Colonna  and  the 
Orsini,  he  acquired  for  disgraceful  crimes  the  ambiguous  title  of  father  of 
his  country.  (/) 

§  255.     Alexander  VI,    Aug.  2,  14d2-Avg,  18,  1603. 

I.  Burchardi  Diarium  Curiae  Rem.  1484-1506.  (Specimen  Iltet  Arcanae  de  Vita  Alex.  ed.  LeHh 
nit.  Han.  1696.  4.  more  fully  in  Eccard  vol.  II.  p.  2017.  Comp.  Paulus,  Soplironizon.  vol  IV.  IL 
1.  vol.  VIII.  H.  6.)    Infeswura.  (p.  2S1.)    In  the  higher  sense  of  history,  GuicciarcNui,  1.  I.-VL 

II.  Mr.  D.  R.  (Dubos?)  la  vie  d*Alex.  Append,  to  the  Illst  dn.  droit  jiabl.  eccl.  franc  Lond. 
1787.  Tommntl,  la  vita  di  Ce^are  Ik>rgla.  Montecliiaro.  1670.  4.  pabllahcd  in  French  as  anonymooi 
Memoirs.  Ainst  1739.  2  vols.  12.  Brl.  1782.  Gordon^  la  vie  da  P.  Ale.x.  et  C6sar  R  trad,  de 
TAnglois.  Amst  1782.  2  voU.  12.    Eplgr.  in  Fktcius,  I.  c.  p.  408. 

Alexander  VI.  (Roderigo  Borgia)  made  use  of  the  whole  power  with 
which  the  Church  supplied  him  to  establish  an  independent  kingdom  for  his 
own  fiimily.  At  one  time  he  appealed  to  all  the  powers  of  Europe  to  asmst 
hira  in  a  struggle  against  France,  when  Charles  VIII.  overran  Italy  to  obtain 
possession  of  Naples,  as  an  inheritance  from  the  house  of  Anjou.  At  another 
he  formed  an  alliance  with  France,  that  he  might  overthrow  some  of  the 
principal  families  of  Rome,  and  spoil  the  Italian  princes  of  their  lawfid  pos- 
sessions.    His  son,  the  fratricide   Caesar  Borgia^  renounced  the  Cardinal^s 


II.  contigiiernnt  Rom.  15S4.  4  Frcf.  1614.  f— II.  IT.  C.  IMtcing,  do  Pil  IL  rebns  gMtfe  et 
morib.  Bor.  1825.  4.  yic,  Bf€t8^  de  Aen.  Bylvii  mornm  mentisqoe  mutatlonis  raUonib.  Bariem. 
1839.    A".  li.  Ifagenhach^  Erinnemngen  an  Aen.  Sylv.  Has.  1S40. 

d)  Platina^  who  suffered  too  much  on  his  account  to  be  impartial  toward  him,  and  hence  sbonld 
be  comp.  with  Cunn^Jtiun^  edit  by  Cardinal  Quirini^  Paull  Veneti  Vita,  praemissls  vindicfis  adv. 
Platlnatn  alio»que.  Rom.  1740.  4. 

e)  IIi!<  scholastic  Treatises,  Rom.  1470.  Nor.  1478.  Life,  probably  by  Platina  in  Murat  vol  IlL 
P.  II.  p.  1052.  Epigrams  in  FlnciiMy  varia  do  comipto  Eec.  statu  poemata.  p.  401a. —  Wdlekn^^ 
polit  Oesch.  d.  1478.  zu  Flor.  geh.  Bynode  n.  dcs  Zwi.stes  dcr  Republ.  mit  Slxt  Botw.  1824. 

/)  In/ettmra  in  Eceard.  p.  19478&~  Hotonf i,  ViU  dlnnocenxo  VIIL  Yen.  1618.  £  Epigrams 
tn  FlaciM,  PL  40S. 


CHAP.  L  PAPACY.  S  «»•  ALEXANDER,  f  256.  JULIUS  II        283 

fant  to  become  a  duke  over  the  principality  to  be  formed  from  the  possessions 
of  the  Church,  and  of  the  princes  of  Central  Italy.    The  Italians  were  en- 
conrage<l  with  the  precious  hope  that  the  great  object  of  his  despotism  was 
the  ultimate  union  of  the  whole  peninsula.     As  a  political  sovereign,  Alex- 
ander gave  great  offence  to  the  Church  by  his  intimate  alliance  with  the 
Sultan  against  France,  (a)    Although  his  sensuality  was  so  disgusting,  that 
be  was  accused  by  public  rumor  of  even  incest  and  every  disgraceful  crime, 
his  talents  were  yet  so  great  and  his  activity  was  so  untiring  in  the  pursuit 
of  his  object**,  and  either  he  or  the  papacy  was  so  much  respected,  that  when 
kings  contended.for  the  possession  of  the  newly  discovered  Western  world,  it 
was  finally  divided  between  Spain  and  Portugal  according  to  his  arbitration. 
He  was  unscrupulous  with  regard  to  the  means  by  which  he  accomplished 
his  plans.     While  yet  only  a  cardinal  he  paid  some  deference  to  public  senti- 
ment, but  when  he  had  attained  the  papacy  he  thought  it  necessary  to  put  it 
down  by  a  censorship  of  books.    This  practice,  originated  by  him,  (h)  was 
regarded  as  amply  suflScient  to  control  the  evil.     Though  he  had  moments  of 
paiuful  contrition,  he  was  sometimes  false  and  hypocritical  merely  for  his  own 
amusement.     He  was  never  guilty  of  weakness  except  with  respect  to  Rosa 
Vanozza  and  her  children.     Though  his  vices  could  not  escajje  the  gonerid 
hatred,  he  was  always  kind  to  the  people.     The  rich  and  tlie  powerful  were 
often  the  victims  of  his  policy,  and  he  did  not  shrink  even  from  assassination 
when  he  thought  it  needful  for  his  purposes.    In  the  midst  of  his  career  he 
fell  a  victim  to  poison,  prepared  by  his  son  for  a  cardinal  then  his  guest, 
nis  government  was  so  conducted  that  every  vestige  of  an  independent  aris- 
tocracy was  effaced  from  the  papal  states. 

§  266.    Julius  IL    Nov,  1,  1503-i^eJ.  21,  1518. 

L  Guicdardini  1.  VI.-XI.  Par  In  de  Grasfth,  Diarium  Curiae  Roin.  1504-22.  never  printed 
b«oje(l  by  AViyntiW  and  Ro9coe  (p.  285.)  ITadrianu*  CVzAt4'//«;t«tf,  Itinerarium  Julil.  (Cioconii 
^ta  K«im.  Pontiff.  Lujrd.  16C3.  vol.  IL)  Sjmlatin,  Lebcn  Julil.  (7>»w«J,  Bcr.  v.  d.  Ke£  Lpz.  1T18. 
»«lILp.lU) 

IL  Duhoik,  Hist  de  la  llgue  faite  k  Cambray.  Haye.  1710.  2  vols.  From  the  time  of  Julias 
A/iwr'i  HW.  of  the  Popes  has  been  Indepentlently  revised  by  RambacK 

On  the  sudden  death  of  Alexander,  the  republic  of  Venice,  Caesiir  Bor- 
gia, and  the  various  inferior  tyrants  endeavored  to  obtain  possession  of  and 
divide  among  themselves  the  papal  states,  while  the  Iloiuan  emperor,  the 
Catholic  sovereign  of  France,  and  the  Most  OhriFtian  King  had  the  same  de- 
Bgn  with  respect  to  Italy  in  general.  Under  these  circumstances,  no  one  but 
the  Cardinal  Julian  della  Rovera  appeared  capable  of  meeting  the  coming 
■tonxL  Ilis  election  was  decided  upon  even  before  the  conclave  met,  by  the 
^•'g*  promises  he  was  able  to  hold  forth.  Julius  IL  was  by  necessity  as 
^dl  as  by  choice  a  military  prince,  but  all  the  arts  of  peace  were  in  the  high- 
ttt  aense  fostered  and  honored  during  his  reign.  Considering  his  Genoese 
•faction,  he  was  remarkably  frank  and  sincere  in  his  disposition,  and 
^o^h  sometimes  swayed  by  an  irascible  temper  and  by  wino,  he  could  not 

a)  Eccard  vol  II.  p.  8058ea.  Fnndgruben  d.  Orients.  voL  Y.  p.  188a& 
h)  Baynald.  ad  ann.  150L  N.  80. 


i 


284  MEDIAEVAL  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  IV.    A.  D.  ISlft-lSlT. 

be  influenced  by  fear,  or  by  a  love  of  gold  or  of  relatives.  Private  passions 
were  indeed  foreign  to  bis  nature.  Eis  sword  and  his  political  eflrbrts  were 
entirely  devoted  to  the  liberation  of  Italy  and  the  enlargement  of  the  papal 
states.  So  effectually,  by  stratagem  and  by  violence,  was  Caesar  Borgia  ex- 
pelled from  Italy,  that  the  very  name  of  Caesar  became  contemptible.  Bo- 
logna and  other  cities  belonging  to  Borgia's  patrimony,  which  had  been  kept 
back  by  petty  tyrants,  were  now  conquered  by  the  mere  terror  of  his  mili- 
tary preparations.  In  opposition  to  the  republic  of  Venice,  which  had 
refused  to  surrender  several  cities  belonging  to  the  eastern  border  of  the 
states  of  St.  Peter,  he  now  entered  into  a  combination  with  the  Emperor 
Maximilian  and  Louis  XII.  to  form  the  League  of  Cambray  (1509).  But 
when  the  French  had  brought  nearly  the  whole  of  Lombardy  into  subjection, 
he  listened  to  the  entreaty  of  the  Venetians  as  they  besought  him  not  to  give 
up  Italy  to  be  plundered  again  by  the  barbarians.  No  sooner  had  his  de- 
mauds  upon  the  Venetians  been  satisfied,  than  he  directed  all  his  civil  and 
ecclesiastical  weapons  against  Louis  XII.  Though  now  an  old  man  and  bro- 
ken down  by  the  gout,  he  hesitated  not  to  throw  himself  into  all  the  cares 
and  dangers  of  a  winter  campaign,  nor  was  he  dismayed  when  his  army  was 
utterly  destroyed,  and  nothing  remained  to  him  but  the  majesty  of  the  papal 
name.  Immediately  by  his  exertions  was  formed  the  llohj  Alliance^  by 
which  Venice,  Spain,  England,  and  the  Swiss  confederacy  became  united 
with  liim,  and  the  French  were  soon  driven  beyond  the  Alps  (1512).  Louis 
met  the  sword  of  St.  Peter  with  spiritual  weapons,  and  by  means  of  some 
disatrectcd  cardinals  he  called  a  general  council  at  Pisa  for  the  reformation 
of  the  Church  (Nov.  5,  1511).  A  few  French  prelates  assembled  there,  who 
proceeded  forthwith  to  suspend  the  pope  as  a  modern  Goliath ;  but  they  were 
soon  compelled  by  the  displeasure  of  the  Italians  to  remove  their  sessions  to 
Milan,  and  during  the  next  year  they  entirely  disappeared  before  the  tri- 
umphant nrniy  of  the  pope.  The  people,  however,  still  continued  to  hope 
that  a  reformation  of  the  Church  might  be  ejected  by  a  general  council,  and 
Julius  had  promised  at  his  election  that  one  should  be  called  together  for  that 
purpose.  Accordingly  a  general  assembly  of  the  Church  was  summoned  to 
meet  in  the  Lateran^  in  opposition  to  that  which  had  convened  at  Pisa.  In 
the  first  session  (May  8,  1512),  a  discourse  was  pronounced  by  Aegidius  of 
Viterbo,  a  general  of  tlie  Augustinian  order,  in  which  it  was  maintained 
that  the  Church  had  become  great  only  by  the  use  of  the  weapons  of  the 
Spirit ;  that  temporal  possessions  were  of  comparatively  small  importance, 
but  that  every  thing  depended  upon  its  wealth  in  spiritual  blessings,  (a)  On 
the  other  hand  the  peculiar  spirit  of  the  pope  himself  was  predominant  in 
the  council,  and  nothing  more  was  done  than  to  summon  France  to  answer 
for  the  adoption  of  the  Pragmatic  Sanction  and  to  anathematize  all  kinds  of 
simony  in  the  election  of  a  pope.  Just  as  this  was  done  Julius  II.  died  while 
meditating  the  most  gigantic  schemes.  Upper  Italy  was  apparently  free,  a 
full  treasury  had  been  prepared  for  his  successor,  and  the  papal  states  were 
extended  to  their  utmost  limits.  There  was  indeed  an  evident  inconsistency 
between  his  character  and  his  oflice,  whicli  gave  occasion  to  some  bitter  ani- 

a)  Harduini  vol.  IX.  p.  15768a.    RioKerH  L.  lY.  V.VLv-im, 


CUAP.  L    PAPACY.    §257.  LEO  X.    PRAO.  SANOnON.  285 

madversions  and  pleasant  satires  (b)  in  countries  beyond  the  Alps.  Franco 
had  annoanced  its  determination  to  destroy  the  great  modem  Babel,  (c)  but 
in  Italy  the  primary  objects  of  this  heroic  man  were  so  popular,  that  his 
name  has  been  invested  there  with  a  splendid  posthumous  renown.  (</) 

§  267.     Leo  X.    March  11,  1518-1517.  (1521.) 

L  Pari*  tie  GraaHs  ($  256.)  Paulm  Javius  (Bluhop  of  Tfocera,  d.  1552),  Vltae  viror.  lUustr. 
(Oppw  hist  Baft.  1578.  f.  voL  I.  VlU  I.)    Gnicciardiui,  1.  XI.-XIV.    Spalatin  In  T^nzfl,  1.  a  p.  18. 

IL  Rcncfw^  Life  and  Pontificate  of  Leo  X.  [Loud.  (Bohn.)  lS^4tt.  2  vols.  S.  Rankc,  IIlsL  of  the 
PopcA.  I^nd.  1845.  (Bohn)  3  vo1&  12.  ami  Phllad.  1S48.  8.]  Rauke,  die  Pup5to.  ihre  K.  n.  ihr  Staat  im 
11  a.  17.  Jahrh.  Brl.  1S84.  vol.  L  p.  69s«.  79s8.  Audin^  Gcsch.  d.  P.  Leo  X-  ft-om  tlie  French  of 
Br%g^  Augf^b.  1S459^  2  vols.  [Boicer't  IlisL  of  the  Popes  to  175S.  and  from  that  time  cont  by  S.  H. 
Oik.  till  lS4d.  New  York.  S.  v.  1848.    J.  E.  RiddU,  Hist  of  the  Papacy,  2  vols.  Lond.  1854.] 

Giovanni  Medici  was  the  sucxjcssor  of  Julius,  with  whose  fortunes  he  had 

been  intimately  and  faithfully  connected  both  in  exile  and  on  the  throne. 

By  the  influence  of  his  father  Lorenzo,  he  had,  even  when  a  boy,  attained 

8ome  of  the  most  exalted  stations  in  the  Church,  and  when  he  reached  the 

papal  chair  he  was  yet  in  the  vigor  of  his  manhood.    By  his  natural  powers 

as  well  as  by  his  uniform  habits  ho  was  prepared  to  relish  every  pleasure 

which  the  world  could  offer,  and  he  therefore  collected  in  the  Vatican  every 

thing  which  could  give  splendor  to  the  arts  and  sciences  of  his  nge.    Well 

educated  in  the  classics  and  in  the  liberal  arts,  he  was  qualified  to  do  this 

with  discrimination,  and  from  his  connections  he  was  disposed  to  look  upon 

these  treasures  as  the  appropriate  patrimony  of  his  house.     Under  the  name 

of  Leo  X.  he  always  showed  himself  a  skilful  and  kind  master,  who  could 

appear  with  dignity  whenever  his  levity  of  disposition  was  not  drawn  forth. 

He  was  not  indeed  a  great  man  either  in  action  or  in  comprehensiveness 

of  views.     Even  the  arts  were  promoted  only  for  his  own  gratification. 

Placed  at  the  very  summit  of  all  human  influence  at  a  time  in  which  God 

created  as  it  were  a  new  world  by  the  hands  of  consummate  artists,  he 

illowed  the  most  exalted  talents  in  his  service  to  exhaust  themselves  in 

trifling  employments.    Although  he  seemed  regardless  of  even  the  outward 

wmbhinee  of  apostolic  or  ecclesiastical  propriety,  he  was  far  from  regarding 

Christianity  as  a  mere  fable.     Ilis  administration   was  characterized  by 

carnestnesi*,  and  when  directed  against  criminals  by  a  due  degree  of  severity. 

His  unbounded  liberality,  however,  as  w^ell  as  his  lavish  profusion,  required 

snpplies  of  wealth  which  rendered  all  kinds  of  expedients  indispensable.    In 

the  contest  which  both  Spain  and  Franco  were  w^aging  to  obtain  possession 

of  Italy,  it  was  his  policy  to  hold  each  at  a  distance  from  the  prey,  and  to 

^tray  each  in  turn  to  the  other.     A  glorious  victory  was  achieved  for  the 

papacy  during  his  administration,  in  the  removal  of  the  Pragmatic  Sanction 

(1516),  which  was  yielded  by  Francis  I.,  that  by  the  friendship  of  the  pope 

kis  conquest  of  Milan  might  be  secured,  and  his  hopes  respecting  Naples 

Blight  be  realized.    The  Council  of  Lateran  continued  in  session  until  March 

16, 1517,  long  enough  to  celebrate  this  victory  and  can-y  into  efiect  a  few 

P^pal  edicts. 


*)  (Uutten?  Erasmus?)  Julius  exclusis.  {Pan^juiU.  vol  II.  Elentlieropoll  I.  e.  Baa.  1544  p.  128s&) 
«)  Wakh,  Yorberlcbt,  to  Uie  15th  vol.  of  Luther's  Werken,  p.  42s». 
<*)  GutceiarditU  L  XL  p.  82«. 


286  MEDIAEVAL  CUURCH  HISTORY.    PEE.  IV.    A.  D.  121«-1517. 


CHAP.  II.— SOCIAL  CONSTITUTION  OF  THE  CnURCH. 

§  258.     Corpus  juris  canonici. 

First  complete  edition  by  Jo.  ChappuU,  Par.  1449sa.  8  voK  ed.  2, 1503.  The  edit  of  the  Correc- 
tores  Roinani,  and  published  by  Gregory  XIII.  to  be  Immutable:  Rom.  1582.  8  voK  f  and  often. 
Critical  Editions:  e  rec  nthoeorum  e<l.  Claud.  U  PelUtier,  Par.  168T.  2  vols.  £  and  often.  J.  H. 
Boehmer,  Hal.  1747.  2  vols.  4.    A.  C.  liichUt,  Lps.  lS88»s.  2  vols.  4. 

While  the  supreme  power  in  the  Church  was  still  in  the  hands  of  the 
popes,  by  the  side  of  the  more  ancient  Decrees  of  Gratian,  a  new  papal 
code  was  gradually  formed  in  three  Collections  of  Decretals,  which  were 
abridged,  harmonized,  sent  to  the  universities,  and  thus  introduced  as  the 
authoritiitive  law  of  the  Church.  1.  Decretalium  Gregorii  IX,  e&mpil/tth^ 
systematically  arranged  in  five  books  by  Raymund  de  Pennaforte^  in  compli- 
ance with  the  orders  of  Gregory  IX,  from  the  rescripts  of  that  pope,  and  a 
few  older  collections.  It  was  intended  to  supply  the  same  position  in  re- 
spect to  ecclesiastical  law  which  was  occupied  in  civil  law  by  the  legislation 
of  the  great  house  of  Hohenstaufen,  and  it  was  published  in  the  year  1234, 
both  in  Paris  and  Bologna,  {a)  2.  Sextxis  Decretalium  Liber^  compiled  in 
five  books  by  order  of  Boniface  VIII,,  from  Decretals  of  a  later  date,  and 
sent  to  the  universities  in  1298.  8.  Clementinae.,  compiled  by  Clement  V. 
from  Constitutions  principally  issued  by  the  general  synod  held  at  Vienne, 
committed  by  himself  to  the  Consistory  of  Cardinals  (1813)  and  to  his  Uni- 
versity of  Orleans,  and  sent  by  his  successor  (1817)  to  Paris  and  Bologna,  (ft) 
Since  this  latter  period,  the  power  of  the  popes  has  not  been  suflicieDt  to  give 
the  force  of  law  to  their  enactments  throughout  Christendom,  and  hence  the 
general  code  of  the  Church  has  been  regarded  as  complete.  But  a  few  later 
laws  have  been  added  by  various  glossarists  and  editors  as  appendices  to  it 
(Extravagantes).  In  the  first  complete  edition  of  the  code,  a  collection  of 
twenty  Extravagantes  of  John  XXII,  which  had  been  before  compiled,  was 
added,  together  with  all  the  laws  of  a  later  date,  so  far  as  they  could  be  ob- 
tained (Extrav.  communes),  until  the  time  of  Sixtus  IV.  Both  those  Appen- 
dices have  been  incorporated  in  the  more  recent  editions,  and  have  therefore 
obtained  in  judicial  proceedings  an  indefinite  but  never  a  legal  authority,  (e) 
These  decrees  and  decretals  constituted  the  elements  from  which  has  been 
formed  the  Corpus  juris  canonic i,  whose  constituent  parts  are  charaoterizod 
by  the  diversified  peculiarities  of  the  times  in  which  they  originated,  but 
take  cognizance  of  all  relations  in  ecclesiastical,  civil,  and  domestic  life.  It 
was  freely  accepted  by  the  whole  Western  Church,  and  applied  by  them  to 
all  cases  in  which  its  provisions  were  consistent  with  ancestral  usages  and 
local  legislation.  On  the  one  hand  it  often  afiTorded  the  protection  of  law 
against  the  arbitrary  conduct  of  the  priesthood,  and  on  the  other  it  served  to 
sustain  the  power  of  the  hierarchy  by  the  force  of  habit  among  the  people 

(i)  Steck^  de  Interpolatlonlbus  Raymundl  de  PennaC  Lps.  1754  i.  Aug.  TTieinsr:  I>e  Rom. 
Pontitt:  epistolarum  deer,  antiquis  collectt.  et  de  Grvg.  IX.  codlce.  Lp&  1629.  4  and  Recberches  sat 
plusleure  collections  inodites  de  ducretales.  Par.  1882. 

b)  G.  L.  Bothmer^  do  Clementinla.  (Ob&s.  Jur.  can.  Ooett  176fi.) 

c)  Bickell^  (L  Entsteh.  a.  Oebr.  d.  ExtravagantensammL  Marb.  ISSSS. 


CHAP.  IL    ECCLES.  LAW.    {  259.  STATE  AND  CHURCH.  287 

and  by  the  efforts  of  learned  men,  long  after  the  real  hasis  of  priestly  au- 
thority had  been  destroyed.  Many  commentaries  (glossae,  apparatus)  upon 
individual  collections  were  produced  by  the  learned  industry  of  this  period. 
From  the  explanations  written  upon  each  of  these  Collections,  a  summary 
(glcflsa  ordinaiia)  has  been  formed  under  the  authority  of  the  schools,  which 
has  obtained  currency  in  the  ordinary  courts,  and  has  the  force  of  common 
legal  usage.  (^ 

§  259.     The  State  and  the  Church. 

The  political  institutions  of  all  the  great  states  of  Europe  were  estab- 
lished near  the  close  of  the  15th  century,  just  as  the  feudal  system  was  giv- 
ing place  to  the  monarchial.    Although  Germany  continued  divided  under 
various  forms  of  government,  some  of  which  were  free  and  others  were  arbi- 
trary, the  independence  of  the  empire  and  permanent  rules  for  the  imperial 
elections  had  been  secured  by  means  of  the  Electoral  Union  at  Rhense  and 
the  Golden  Bull  (1856).    A  definite  legal  condition  had  also  been  established 
(rinoe  1495)  by  the  Landfriede^  or  the  Peace  of  the  country,  and  the  Impe- 
rial Chamber  of  Justice.    France^  by  the  despotism  of  some  of  its  kings, 
the  persecution  of  its  great  vassals,  and  the  favor  shown  to  the  Third  Es- 
tate, had  finally  become  a  consolidated  kingdom,  circumscribed  by  power- 
ftd  subordinate  corporations.    For  a  while  England  had  fought  gloriously  but 
TmsQocessfnlly  for  a  territory  by  nature  assigned  to  France ;  it  had  then  been 
distnurted  by  civil  wars,  in  which  its  principal  nobility  contended  for  the 
crown,  until  the  leaders  of  the  great  parties  were  gradually  struck  down  by 
i  terrible  judgment  of  heaven,  and  finally  Henry  VIL  (1485-1509),  by  de- 
praring  the  nobility  and  exalting  the  inferior  classes,  had  established  his 
throne  upon  a  permanent  basis.    By  the  marriage  of  Ferdinand  the  Catholic 
with  the  hereditary  Queen  of  Castile,  Spain  also  had  become  united  as  a  sin- 
^  kingdom,  before  whose  power  Grenada,  the  last  Moorish  city,  after  an 
heroic  struggle,  was  compelled  to  yield  (1492).    In  Italy  the  popes  were 
themselves  too  feeble  to  obtain  the  sovereignty  of  the  whole  peninsula,  and 
y«t  too  proud  to  allow  any  other  prince  to  do  so.    From  the  time  of  the 
Emperor  Charles  the  Great,  the  people  had  invited  various  foreign  rulers  to 
cater  it,  whom  they  soon  found  themselves  unable  to  endure,  (a)    The  power 
of  the  priesthood  was  no  longer  needed  or  sufficient  for  the  guardianship  of 
the  state.    The  prelates  of  the  several  countries  were  compelled  to  share  in 
the  Tarions  fortunes  of  the  higher  nobility.    "WTienever  any  see  became  va- 
csat,  the  kings  of  France  and  England  claimed  its  revenues  as  regalia  until 
^  new  prelate  had  taken  the  oath  of  allegiance  to  them,  and  the  crown  of 
Frtnce  chiimed  possession  of  all  vacant  benefices  in  any  diocese  until  it  was 
fflci    By  the  Concordat  with  Francis  I.  the  rights  of  the  Gallicau  Church 
were  shared  between  the  king  and  the  pope.  (6)    In  Germany  the  king  pos- 
*>*d  a  prerogative,  according  to  which  a  prelate  was  bound  to  compl}  witli 
^  first  request  for  an  appointment  to  a  benefice  which  the  emperor  made 

d)  Sarti  L  e.  p.  SSSas.    Batigny^  Gesch.  d.  rom.  K.  vol  YI.  pi  87(& 
a)  IfacMaveUi,  Btorie  Fior.  (0pp.  lUlU,  1818.)  toL  I.  p.  18. 8& 
h)  P.  d4  Marco,  YIII,  22.  |  6.    Banke,  Pipste,  vol  L  p.  83. 


i 


288  MEDIAEVAL  ClIUKCII  1II8T0BT.    PER.  IV.    A.  D.  121«-1B1T. 

after  his  consecration,  (e)  The  long  contested  right  of  requiring  that  aD 
papal  edicts  should  he  subject  to  tlie  approval  of  the  civil  authority  before 
they  were  publicly  acknowledged,  was  maintained  by  a  few  governments  in 
a  rather  violent  manner.  (</)  In  spite  of  continual  denials  of  their  compe- 
tency the  civil  courts  asserted  with  increasing  success  their  jurisdiction  over 
private  legal  suits,  in  opposition  to  the  exorbitant  claims  of  the  spiritual 
courts.  The  powers  of  the  clergy  were  especially  curtailed  by  governments 
and  rulers  of  a  republican  character.  In  France,  when  the  parliaments  had 
once  succeeded  in  attaining  independent  judicial  and  civil  authority,  their 
rights  were  guarded  with  extreme  jealousy,  and  the  bishops  were  made  re- 
sponsible for  every  encroachment  upon  them.  The  Lombardic  cities,  es- 
pecially Venice,  the  Swiss  Confederates  (parson's  letter,  1370),  and  the  Ger- 
man imperial  diet,  demanded  that  the  clergy  should  be  subject  to  the  ordinary 
penal  laws  of  tlie  country,  should  contribute  their  share  of  public  taxes,  and 
be  restrained  within  certain  limits  in  their  acquisition  of  ecclesiastical  pro- 
perty, (e)  The  Free  Court  of  the  Vehme  in  Westphalia  went  so  far  as  to 
withhold  their  secrets  from  the  confessional.  (/) 

§  2C0.     The  Ecdesiastieal  Power  of  the  Papacy. 

The  papacy  now  essentially  dinetised,  and  yet  obliged  to  put  before  the 
world  the  most  exorbitant  claims,  became  henceforth  a  destructive  power  in 
the  Churcli.  By  the  authority  conceded  to  the  decretals  the  pope  became 
the  creator  df  his  own  prerogatives  at  pleasure.  The  bold  announcement  of 
the  papal  decision  that  nothing  could  hinder  the  execution  of  the  pope's  com- 
mands (non  obstante  quocnnque),  was  in  utter  contempt  of  the  acknowledged 
rights  of  every  class.  The  power  which  eacli  party  in  a  suit  possessed  when- 
ever it  i)leascd  to  have  its  cause  removed  to  Rome,  was  occasionally  almost 
equivalent  to  a  complete  denial  of  justice.  The  influence  of  the  pastors  was 
also  much  impaired  by  the  profitable  papal  usurpation  of  a  general  power  to 
confer  absolution,  and  grant  dispensations.  Then  as  the  pope  alone  could 
contirm  the  elections  of  all  bishops  and  abbots,  no  one,  however  deserving, 
could  reach  the  office  of  a  prelate  without  the  friendship  of  influential  per- 
sons at  Rome,  or  some  act  of  royal  authority.  Nearly  all  other  lucrative  oflB- 
cos  in  the  Church  were  disposed  of  directly  by  the  Roman  see,  under  various 
legal  forms  (reservation,  prevention,  devolution,  commendam,  accident  of 
death  at  the  Roman  court).  Consequently,  foreigners  and  mercenary  tools 
gained  admission  to  the  Church,  united  several  offices  and  the  revenues  de- 
rived from  them  in  their  single  persons,  frequently  without  over  seeing  their 
congregations,  and  while  living  in  extravagance  at  the  papal  court.  This 
power  of  ecclesiastical  patronage  was  an  inexhaustible  source  of  papal  wealth, 


c)  II.  C.  de  Senkenberg,  do  jure  prlmarum  precum,  indulto  papali  hand  indlgonte.  Frcf  1784. 4 

d)  StockmanA,  jtis  Belgttrum  circa  bullarum  rcceptlonein.  (0pp.  Col.  1700.  4.  cap.  2.) 

«)  liaumer,  Ilohenstauf.  vol.  III.  p.  19Z».—IiaIthii9ar,  libt  Entwlckl.  d.  Freibelton  n.  d.  0«richto- 
bark.  <l  Eldgon.  In  peistl.  Dingon.  Zur.  176S.  {Fuchti)  Vcre.  c  pragm.  Oc!>ch.  d.  staatsrccbtL  KVeit 
d.  Eidgon.  Germanien.  181G.— t^  O.  lieiiihard^  Mcditt  de  jure  principum  Germ,  cum  primls  Sax- 
oniao  circa  racra  ante  temp,  refonnatlouis.  Hal.  1717.  4 

/)  a  O.  V,  WdchUr,  Boltrr.  z.  dout5cben  Gof^ch.  Insb.  d.  Strafyecbta.  T&b.  1S4S.  p.  8S. 


CHAP.  IL    ECCLES.  LAW.    { 260.  ECCLE3.  POWER  OF  THE  PAPACY.         289 

partly  on  acconnt  of  the  money  usually  given  at  every  confirmation  and  the 
annate,  and  partly  on  account  of  the  open  sale  of  offices.    The  protection  of 
ecclesbstical  property,  which  had  formerly  been  confided  to  the  pope,  became 
gradually  the  occasion  for  a  general  assessment  of  tithes  for  carrying  on  the 
war  with  the  Turks,  and  finally  became  recognized  as  affording  a  riglit  of  tax- 
ing the  Church  to  sustain  the  popes  in  their  various  wars,  {a)    Even  the  bet- 
ter class  of  popes  could  accomplish  very  little  in  opposition  to  these  abuses, 
during  the  short  period  of  an  ordinary  pai)al  reign.     The  reversions  had  in- 
deed been  prohibited  after  the  time  of  Alexander  III.,  but  they  had  in  some 
instance?  been  bestowed  for  the  whole  period  of  a  single  generation,  and  the 
officers  of  the  Roman  Curia  were  exceedingly  depraved.    But  other  popes  of 
an  nnworthy  character  were  well  acquainted  with  methods  by  wliich  even 
this  unhappy  stiite  of  things  might  become  more  disgraceful  and  treacherous. 
Offices  were  sold  to  the  highest  bidder,  and  payment  sometimes  received  from 
different  persons  for  the  same  living.  {Ji)    It  was  in  vain  that  individual  pro- 
tective laws  and  acts  of  authority  were  directed  against  these  methods  of 
impoverishing  the  people.    When  the  evil  had  attained  its  utmost  limit  an 
effort  was  made  by  the  great  councils  to  restore  security  to  ecclesiastical  prop- 
erty, and  to  re-establish  the  Christian  character  of  the  offices  of  the  Church. 
Bat  France  was  the  only  country  which  succeeded  in  this  attempt.    The  new 
pragmatic  sanction,  which  gave  to  that  country  this  distinction,  had  been 
abandoned,  it  is  true,  in  consequence  of  the  royal  policy,  but  it  never  lost  its 
authority  as  an  expression  of  what  was  regarded  by  the  French  people  as 
law,  and  it  was  always  defended  by  the  parliament  and  the  universities,  {c) 
Other  nations  were  satisfied  with  a  few  unimportant  concessions.     The  Ger- 
SMn  i)eople  were  contented  with  the  Concordat  of  Vienna,  by  which  appoint- 
ments to  ecclesiastical  ofiices  were  withdrawn  from  the  papal  chair  for  one 
half  of  eacli  year.    But  conce<*sions  obtained  as  a  mere  matter  of  grace  {d) 
were  soon  rendered  useless  by  new  encroaclimonts.    Two  theories  had  been 
put  forth  at  Constance  and  at  Ba^^le — Ej/isco2)al ism,  accordmg  to  which  the 
pt>pe  was  merely  the  first  oflicer  of  the  Church,  and  was  subject  to  its  laws 
*Qd  representatives ;  and  Curialism,  which  carried  the  earlier  doctrine  of  the 
plenary  power  of  the  pope  so  far  as  to  assert  his  absolute  infallibility,  exagge- 
rated his  superiority  to  all  law  until  it  amounted  to  idolatrous  honors,  and 
Wly  made  its  flatteries  absolutely  ri<licuIous,  by  asserting  that  simony  was 
impoadible  at  Rome,  {e)    Both  theories  were  founded  upon  positive  laws,  and 
l»th  were  defended  by  men  of  great  learning.    The  first  was  the  spontaneous 
wcrtion  of  the  whole  French  nation,  and  the  latter  was  maintained  by  the 
*Jody  of  the  clergy  at  Rome.    The  pious  reverence  which  the  people  always 
•tttertained  for  the  vicegerent  of  God  on  earth,  had  been  essentially  impaired. 
^  yet  they  were  generally  far  from  denying  the  necessity  of  a  pope  to 

0)  The  cr.mplalnts  and  concefuions  in  the  actrt  of  tlio  Counoth  of  Constance  and  Baslo,  and  tlie 
vraMii„-„^  of  the  German  naUon  at  the  Diets  afford  proofe  in  abundance. 

i)  E.  G.  Th*od,  d0  Mem,  do  schism.  II,  7i«. 

«)  LalAti  ct  CoAMrtii  Cone  vol.  XIV.  p.  202s8.  Richerii  Hist  ConcilL  I  IV,  2.  c  4  MuncK 
Cottwdit,  vol.  I.  p.  256si. 

*0  ifii.  Sifltii  Epi  8S5. 

•)  i«^g^t  Triumphi  L  c  Qn.  IX.  Art  1-4.  Qa.  V.  Art  & 

19 


290  MEDIAEVAL  CHURCH  HI8T0RT.    PER.  IV.    A.  D.  121«-161T. 

maintain  the  unity  and  government  of  the  Church.  A  prediction,  ascribed 
to  Malachias,  Archbishop  of  Armagh,  a  friend  of  St.  Bernard,  but  which 
probably  had  its  origin  in  the  time  of  the  great  councils,  describes  with  more 
or  less  accuracy,  in  concise,  obscure,  and  figurative  language,  the  character 
of  the  popes  from  the  time  of  Celcstine  II.  (1148).  The  centuries  which 
have  since  elapsed  have  developed  nothing  to  bring  discredit  upon  it,  for 
according  to  it  eleven  popes  yet  remain  before  the  last  pope  shall  rule  over 
the  Church  in  great  tribulation,  and  the  city  of  the  seven  hills  shall  be 
destroyed.  (/)  On  various  occasions  the  Cardinals  endeavored,  by  stipula- 
tions before  a  papal  election,  to  secure  their  persons  and  revenues  from  vio- 
lence, and  to  bind  the  successful  candidate  by  their  decisions,  (g)  But  no 
sooner  had  any  one  actually  reached  the  papal  chair  than  he  utterly  disre- 
garded all  such  illegal  restrdnts,  so  that  the  privileges  of  the  cardinals  were 
founded  only  upo»  contradictory  precedents,  and  were  respected  on  personal 
rather  than  official  grounds.  In  the  season  of  extremity,  when  the  Church 
was  rent  by  divisions,  they  placed  themselves  at  the  head  of  the  Church. 
The  decrees  of  the  Councils  of  Constance  and  Basle,  by  which  the  college  of 
cardinals  was  declared  to  be  the  constitutional  authority  of  the  Church,  and 
which  required  that  it  should  be  composed  of  pious,  learned,  and  useful  men, 
selected  from  all  Christian  nations,  (h)  were  never  carried  into  execution. 
With  but  few  exceptions  the  cardinals  were  chosen  from  among  the  nepotes 
of  the  popes,  the  scions  of  a  few  great  Roman  families  (familie  papale),  and 
certain  royal  favorites,  for  whom  the  kings  of  the  different  nations,  according 
to  tlieir  influence,  were  able  to  obtain  the  scarlet  hat. 

§  261.     The  Ecclesiastical  Assemblies. 

• 

In  a  few  bishoprics  regular  diocasan  synods  were  formed,  that  they  might 
afford  counsel  to  the  bishops  and  be  the  depositaries  of  Ids  will.  Provincial 
synods  from  an  indefinite  extent  of  country  were  seldom  held,  and  only  on 
special  occasions  under  the  presidency  of  a  legate.  The  national  councils 
had  been  almost  universally  absorbed  by  the  assemblies  of  the  estates  of  the 
empire.  The  greater  or  less  general  councils  which  were  convoked  by  the 
popes  until  some  time  in  the  fourteenth  century,  cither  in  the  Lateran  or  in 
the  south  of  France,  were  composed  of  representatives  of  the  states,  assem- 
bled  partly  to  ascertain  the  sentiments  and  wants  of  the  Church  throughout 
the  country,  and  partly  to  carry  into  effect  the  papal  decrees.  In  these 
assemblies  very  little  regard  was  paid  to  the  peculiar  privileges  of  the  seve- 
ral states  either  with  respect  to  their  position  or  to  the  order  in  which  they 
voted,  but  every  one  had  influence  and  precedence  in  proportion  to  his  knowl- 
edge of  the  subject  in  hand,  or  to  his  oflScial  or  personal  authority.  It  was 
for  this  reason  that  we  find  so  much  indefiniteness  with  regard  to  the  right 
of  voting  and  the  order  of  business  which  produced  such  want  of  precision 
in  the  mode  of  conducting  the  assemblies  of  the  fifteenth  century.    As  the 

/)  The  literature  in  FnhHc  BibL  med.  et  inf.  Latin.  T.  V.  v.  Malachias. 
g)  Raynald.  ad  ann.  1481.  N.  &ss.  ad  ann.  1453.  N.  5. 

h)  Gerin.  nationls  Concordat)  c.  1.  {Uardt  vol.  I.  p.  1055.)  Cona  Baa.  8.  XXIIL  deer.  4.  (JfiMM< 
TOL  XXIX.  p.  11608.) 


chap.il  eccles.  law.  1 26t  ecclesiastical  assemblies.  291 

Chnrch  conld  claim  the  essential  prerogative  of  infallibility  only  when  it 
spoke  through  an  individaal  and  supreme  organ,  the  contidence  of  the  people, 
00  (ar  a^  relates  to  this  power,  was  gradually  withdrawn  from  the  dependent 
councils,  and  bestowed  upon  the  independent  pope.    The  liberal  party,  how- 
ever, ever  since  the  Council  of  Constance,  were  obliged  to  maintain  that  this 
infallibility  belonged  only  to  the  councils,  for  otherwise  the  supreme  author- 
ity of  such  assemblies  must  have  been  renounced,  (a)     When  the  three  great 
Assemblies  of  the  Church  grasped  after  the  supremo  power,  they  certainly 
could  have  appealed  to  the  example  of  ecclesiastical  antiquity,  but  in  the 
state  in  which  legal  matters  had  stood  for  centuries  before  their  time,  such 
an  assumption  had  all  the  effect  of  a  revolution.    It  had,  however,  been 
called  for  by  the  force  of  circumstances  without  arbitrary  violence  on  the 
part  of  any  one.    These  general  councils  formed  the  design  of  becoming 
regular  periodical  assemblies  for  the  administration  of  the  legislative,  execu- 
tive, and  supremo  judicial  affairs  ot  the  Church.    At  Basle  it  was  also  per- 
ceived that  this  representation  of  the  whole  Church  would  require  the  revi- 
val of  a  Synodal  Constitution,  according  to  which  there  must  be  a  regular 
series  of  assemblies,  beginning  with  the  lowest.     But  from  various  local 
obstacles  it  was  found  difficult  to  secure  an  actual  assembly  of  the  represen- 
tatives of  the  whole  Church,  or  perfect  freedom  to  their  decisions.     Only  in 
times  of  great  extremity,  or  of  universally  acknowledged  necessity,  could 
these  difficulties  be  overcome,  and  hence  the  pope  did  not  ordinarily  find  it 
bard  to  elude  the  action  of  these  dangerous  assemblies,  or  by  convening  them 
in  the  Lateran  to  reduce  them  to  their  former  insignificance.     Appeals  to  a 
future  general  council  were  forbidden  under  penalty  of  excommunication  by 
Martin  V.,   Pius,  and  Julius  II.,  (h)  since  every  papal  enactment  would 
thereby  have  become  nugatory  on  account  of  the  indefinite  period  in  which 
it  would  remain  in  suspense.     Still  from  the  sense  of  justice  which  existed  in 
the  Church,  these  appeals  were  recognized,  and  were  sometimes  made  with 
greater  or  less  success  as  legal  forms  of  opposition  to  the  papal  decrees.     The 
legality  of  tlie  Council  of  Pisa  was  questioned  by  the  liberal  party,  (r)    The 
decrees  of  the  Council  of  Constance  were  generally  acknowledged  by  the 
Boman  court.     The  validity  of  the  Council  of  Basle  was  altogether  denied 
bj  those  who  favored  Kome,  but  according  to  the  principles  of  canonical  law 
it  was  certainly  a  legal  assembly,  at  least  until  its  twenty-sixth  session.    The 
pypea  were  careful  to  observe  a  prudent  silence  respecting  the  supremacy  of 
the  general  councib^  but  in  practice  they  entirely  disregarded  it.    They  were 
thus,  unfortunately  for  themselves,  victorious  over  a  revolution  which  might 
otherwise  have  preserved  the  unity  and  the  peaceful  development  of  the 
Cborch. 


«)  (Ai«)  Krit  Qtfch.  d.  klrchl.  Unfchlbark.  FrankC  1790.  p.  240ft8. 

i)  Gfr^on^  Opp.  vol  IL  P.  2.  p.  8908.  Gohellini  Cmmtr.  1.  III.  p.  9\.—Ofrson^  qnomodo  et  an 
^  ia  caaa«  fldri  a  Sammo  Pootit  appellare.  (voL  II.  P.  2.  p^  80S«.)  OoldutU  Monarcbia,  vol. 
^l-M17fcA  1592«.     Rick^ril,  lllst.  ConclIL  L  II.  p.  142. 

c;  fliirc/t,  Cone.  Constant  vol  IV.  P.  2.  p.  24.  comp.  vol.  II.  p.  194. 


I 


292  MEDIAEVAL  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  IV.    A.  D.  1216-1517. 

§  262.     The  National  Churches. 

The  Clmrchcs  connected  with  those  nations  which  had  heen  developed 
out  of  tlio  Roman  empire  through  the  various  Germanic  races,  had  long 
since  become  organized  into  distinct  communities,  in  consequence  of  their 
intimate  connection  with  the  people  and  the  civil  government  of  each  coun- 
try. And  yet  the  influence  of  a  common  origin,  and  of  a  central  point  of 
intercourse  was  so  great,  that  they  all  felt  themselves  as  parts  of  one  vast 
empire  receiving  its  laws  from  Rome.  Although  the  popes  were  frequently 
requested  to  fill  all  ecclesiastical  offices  with  persons  who- were  natives  of  the 
country  in  which  they  were  to  officiate,  even  such  a  demand  was  rejected 
sometimes  to  maintain  the  grand  doctrine  of  the  unity  of  the  Church,  and 
sometimes  that  special  favor  might  be  conferred  upon  the  Italians.*  But  in 
proportion  as  the  central  power  became  enfeebled,  these  nationalities  bec^mie 
more  decidedly  prominent  first  in  France,  in  opposition  to  tlie  i)apal  as  well 
as  to  the  imperial  universal  monarchy,  and  secured  the  peculiar  privileges  of 
their  respective  national  Church  by  concordats  with  Rome.  Accordingly 
we  have  seen  that  they  presented  themselves  at  Constance  and  acted  there 
as  legal  corporations.  It  was  more  especially  by  means  of  the  separate  com- 
pacts then  concluded,  and  the  ground  assumed  by  the  synod  at  Basle,  that 
the  great  fundamental  princii)le  of  law  was  settled,  that  no  decree  either  of  a 
pope  or  a  council  possessed  legal  authority  in  any  country  pntil  it  had  been 
accepted  by  the  national  Church  there. 

§  263.     The  Biifhops  and  their  Jurisdiction. 

As  the  appointment  of  nearly  all  ecclesiastical  officers  had  been  usurped 
by  Rome,  and  ecclesiastical  acts  of  all  kinds  could  be  purchased  by  the  Ex- 
emptions, especially  during  the  time  of  the  schism,  the  result  was  that  the 
episcopal  power  had  been  very  much  impaired.  This  induced  the  bishops  at 
Constance  and  at  Basle  to  assume  a  tlireatening  attitude,  and  to  demand  the 
restoration  of  all  that  they  had  lost.  But  every  bishop  had  something  to 
fear  or  hope  for  from  Rome,  and  nearly  every  one  dreaded  to  fall  into  the 
hands  of  a  body  which,  after  it  had  shaken  the  papacy,  had  power  also  to 
overthrow  the  prelatic  sees.  The  prelates  were  therefore  generally  satisfied 
with  their  secular  honors,  and  abandoned  the  great  struggle  to  look  after 
inferior  advantages.  Tlie  Chapters  became,  especially  in  Germany,  desirable 
places  in  which  tlie  younger  sons  of  the  nobility  were  provided  for,  and  con- 
sequently their  position  was  entirely  secular  and  without  interest  to  the  body 
of  the  people.  On  the  other  hand,  the  decrees  of  Rome  and  Basle  met  with 
very  trifling  success  when  they  required  that  half  the  vacancies  in  the  chap- 
ters should  be  filled  by  men  of  distinction  in  science  -and  in  the  Church. 
The  archdeacons  were  also  circumscribed  on  the  side  of  the  bishops,  by  a 
college  composed  almost  exclusively  of  secular  officials^  (a)  and  a  kind  of 
penitentiiiU^  who  were  appointed  for  the  purpose  of  preaching  and  having 


*  ITonorii  regcsta,  a.  V.  N.  17.  (Jiaumer,  vol.  VL  p.  15.)  Comp.  Mat.  ParU  ad  ann.  1240.  p. 
860.  ad  ann.  1245.  p.  445.  450. 

a)  Sext  I,  18.  De  officio  vlcariL— P^rtecA,  v.  d.  Arcbidlak.,  blsch.  Offldaleii  n.  Vicarl«n. 
nilde«h.  1748. 


CHAP.  IL    KCCLE9.  LAW.    { 261  INQUISITION.  293 

the  charge  of  souls.  (/>)  Those  bishops  wlio  preferred  to  live  as  princes  asso- 
ciated with  themselves,  for  the  performance  of  their  episcopal  and  priestly 
duties,  a  class  of  persons  who  were  called  Chore]/ iscopi  and  Suffragan 
BiffhffjfS.  These  were  bishops  who  had  been  expelled  from  their  dioceses  in 
the  Oriental  Church,  and  were  afterwards  appointed  by  the  i)ope  as  an  ex- 
pression of  a  perpetujd  hope,  and  a  protestation  with  respect  to  those  ancient 
episcopal  sees  (Episcopi  in  partibus  irifidclium).  (e)  In  consequence  of  the 
contest  maintained  by  the  University  of  Paris  against  the  encroachments  of 
the  mendicant  friars,  and  as  the  result  of  the  position  assumed  by  the  Synod 
of  Basle,  the  assertion  was  put  forth  in  France,  that  the  paiff&rs  had  been 
instituted  by  Christ  to  be  an  essential  element  of  his  Church,  with  a  limited 
bat  a  peculiar  sphere  of  action,  (d) 

§  264.     The  Inquisition. 

Nic  Eymerieus  (d.  1899),  Directorium  Inqulsitorum,  Barcin.  1508.  c  Comm.  Fr.  Pegnae^  Iloin. 
157\  £  and  often.  Lud.  de  Paravio^  do  orig.,  officio  vi  progrcssu  6*.  Inquls.  Matr.  1598.  f.  Antn. 
UI9.  f.  Ifiil.  a  Limhorch.  HUt  Inq.  Aiii8t  169*2.  f.  Samml.  d.  Instmct  d.  Span.  InqiiUitionsgor. 
ueben  v.  ReuM^  with  SpittUr'a  Entw.  d.  Geftcli.  d.  Sp.'in.  Inq.  Ilan.  178^.  Uorente^  Hist  critique 
(lellnq.  d'Eapa^e,  Trad,  de  I'Espa^n.  p.  A.  PellUr^  Par.  ISITh.  4  vols.  [Limborch's  (nhridgeci)  Mul 
Uoftnte^s  Histories  liave  been  translated  and  publ.  in  Ix)ndon  and  tbo  latter  iu  Philad.  See  ab^: 
Eieords  of  the  Inq.  from  the  orig.  MSS.  taken  at  Barcelona.  Boston.  1S28.] 

When  the  general  massacre  which  took  place  in  the  war  against  the  Albi- 
genses  {§  231)  was  closed  by  their  public  subjugation,  the  work  of  extermi- 
nating those  remnants  who  were  known  to  exist  in  secret  was  intrusted  by 
Innocent  III.  to  the  synodal  courts.     The  method  in  which  this  was  to  be 
iccomphshed  was  determined  upon  at  tlie  Synod  of  Toulouse  (1229),  and 
was  as  follows :  (a)  "  Any  prince,  lord,  bishop,  or  judge,  who  shall  spare  a  here- 
tic, shall  forfeit  his  lands,  property,  or  office ;  and  every  house  in  which  a 
heretic  is  found  shall  be  destroyed.     Ileretics  or  i)ersons  su.spected  of  heresy 
ihall  not  be  allowed  the  assistance  of  a  physician,  or  of  any  of  tlieir  asso- 
ciates in  crime,  even  though  they  may  be  sulfering  under  a  mortal  disease. 
Sincere  penitents  shall  be  removed  from  the  neighborhood  in  which  they 
reside  if  it  is  suspected  of  heresy,  they  shall  wear  a  peculiar  dress,  and  for- 
feit all  public  privileges  until  they  receive  a  papal  dispensation.     Penitents 
who  have  recanted  through  fear  shall  be  }»laced  in  confinement."     But  lest 
hishops  should  be  tempted  to  show  some  favor  to  those  who  were  dependent 
on  them,  Gregory  IX.  devolved  the  holy  office  upon  foreign  monLs  (1232).   The 
I^minicans  gradually  became  possessed  of  this  office,  and  it  was  looked  upon 
•8  their  peculiar  inheritance.    Louis  IX.,  from  a  regard  to  religion,  and  Ray- 
^ndVII.  of  Toulouse  and  Frederic  II.,  from  a  regard  to  their  own  reputa- 
tion, enacted  certain  laws  w^hich  required  tliat  the  sentences  passed  by  the 
mqnisition  should  be  carried  into  execution  by  the  civil  authorities,  (b)    Tlicse 


*)  Gone.  Later.  IV.  c  10.  {Greg.  I,  81.  c.  15.) 

c)  Diirr,  de  Baffraganeis  a.  vicariis  gencralibus    in  p<»ntiflcalibus  Episcoponini  Genn.  Mog. 
ITS.  4. 

^  Oirun,  0pp.  vol.  IL  p.  250.  1067. 

o>  Cone  Later.  IV.  c  8  {Munsi  vol.  XXII.  p.  9S6&:*.)    Coiw.  Ti>losan.  c.  1-2^.  (Ih.  v.il.  XXIIL 
P  1H«.)   [London's  Manual  of  Ct.oncils,  jk  694.] 
*)  Ordoninces  des  Roys  de  France,  p.  Jf.  de  LaurUre,  Par.  1728.  t  vol  I.  p.  5(k    Statu ta 


294  MEDIAEVAL  CHUBCU  HISTOBT.    PER.  IV.    A.  D.  1216-1517. 

holy  fathers  were  responsible  to  no  one  but  the  pope  himself,  and  it  was  their 
duty  to  search  for  heretics  in  every  quarter.  They  had  the  right  to  imprison 
any  one  who  was  suspected,  and  instead  of  fornishing  him  with  a  list  of  the 
charges  alleged  against  him,  they  required  of  him  a  general  oonfession.  Tor- 
ture was  used  in  their  examinations,  and  witnesses  whose  names  were  con- 
cealed were  sometimes  taken  from  among  convicted  criminals,  the  most 
worthless  of  men,  and  accomplices  in  guilt,  (c)  The  punishments  inflicted 
were,  public  penance,  confiscation  of  property,  perpetual  imprisonment,  and 
death  by  burning,  from  which  even  a  recantation  was  not  always  sufficient 
to  deliver  the  victim.  The  inquisition  now  became,  in  the  hands  of  the  hier- 
archy, a  desperate  means  of  sustaining  by  violence  and  terror  that  influence 
whose  true  foundation  had  begun  to  crumble.  In  vain  did  the  people  in  the 
south  of  France  rise  in  rebellion,  and  take  sanguinary  vengeance  upon  some 
of  their  inquisitors.  In  Itah/y  where  the  spiritual  power  was  more  limited 
by  peculiar  circumstances,  the  inquisition  found  it  impossible  to  carry  out  its 
murderous  spirit.  In  Germany  the  people  combined  with  the  bishops  against 
this  attempt  to  force  upon  them  this  tribunal  for  heretics,  and  Conrad  of 
Marburg^  then  acting  as  its  president,  fell  a  victim  to  their  violence  (1238).(//) 
In  Spain,  where  the  Jews  and  Moors  had  recently  been  baptized  (after  1391), 
notwithstanding  a  strong  remaining  attachment  to  their  ancestral  faith,  the 
holy  court  was  introduced  to  take  cognizance  of  all  public  or  secret  relapses 
which  might  take  place  among  them ;  for,  although  ecclesiastical  ethics  would 
allow  of  no  force  in  the  conversion  of  men  to  Christianity,  the  violation  of 
Christian  vows  was  punished  not  only  by  force,  but  by  death  itself,  (t}  It 
was  in  this  country  that  the  inquisition,  under  its  General  Torquemada  (after 
1483),  developed  its  fearful  power.  It  was  there  established  by  the  royal 
authority  (1478),  but  it  soon  became  in  his  hands  a  government  of  terror 
which  dictated  terms  to  the  king  himself,  trampled  upon  the  opposition  not 
only  of  the  imperial  diet,  but  of  every  other  power,  and  finally  crushed  aS 
freedom  of  thought  in  Church  or  State.  The  popes  with  some  reluctance 
yielded  their  consent  to  these  proceedings.  Even  Ximeneny  with  a  character 
truly  heroic,  and  worthy  of  Spain  in  its  ancient  and  best  days,  who,  on  ac- 
count of  his  rigid  monastic  sanctity,  had  been  appointed  Archbis^hop  of 
Toledo,  Cardinal  of  Spoin,  and  finally  Regent  of  Castile  (d.  1517),  and  was  a 
munificent  patron  of  science,  regarded  it  as  not  beneath  his  dignity  to  accept 
of  tlie  office  of  Grand  Inquisitor,  that  he  might  secure  power  enough  to  cor- 
rect iujustice,  defend  the  Christian  faith,  and  rescue  the  monarchy  from  the 
feudalism  of  the  middle  ages.  (/)  Such  an  inquisition  could  be  introduced 
and  sustained  only  among  a  people  which  for  centuries,  and  during  long  pro- 
tracted wars  for  their  country  and  for  their  religion,  had  been  accustomed 


Raimundi  super  b»ere»i  Albigensi  a.  128a  {ManH  toL  XXIII.  p.  26560.)    Petri  de   yintit  L  I. 
Epp.  25-27. 

e)  Martens,  Thes.  anecdot  toI.V.  p.  17860S.  17956&— X.  A.BieMr,  B«itr.  i.  G«eeh.  d.  Inqoteitlon*- 
Proce»c9.  Lpz.  1827.  p.  60ss. 

d)  AWericut  ad  ann.  1283.  p.  &44sa.     Trithem.  Cbron.  Ilin.  vol  I.  p.  628L 

e)  Thomas,  Summa,  P.  II.  P.  2.  Qo.  10. 

/)  C  J.  I/ffeie,  d.  Card.  Xlmeniv  u.  d.  klrchl.  Znstande  Bpan.  Insbca.  x.  ITurdigaiig  d.  Inqola. 
Tab.  1S41    iliichel  AiudUr,  Ulst  dtt  U  tU  et  do  I'adminiatration  da  Card.  Xhinna.  Par.  1851  &^ 


CHAP.  m.    EOCLES.  LIFE.    { 26&  FBANCIS  OF  ASSI8L    DOMINIG.  295 

to  regard  the  purity  and  antiquity  of  their  faith  as  saperior  to  all  other  oon- 
aderations.  It  has,  however,  reduced  this  noble  nation  to  the  lowest  state 
of  morals,  and  defrauded  it  of  its  natural  course  of  development. 


OHAP.    III.  — EOOLESIASTIOAL    LIFE. 
§  265.     The  Two  Great  Mendicant  Orders, 

L  Ylta  &  Francisei  by  Thoma%  ds  Celano,  1229.  (Acta  SS.  Oct  vol  II.  p.  688.)  completed  In 
ItU.  bj  L^Oy  Angtlu9  et  Ruffinut  (Tres  Socii,  76.  p.  723.)  aa  the  holy  book  of  the  Order  by  Bona- 
Tentara.  (/A.  p.  742.)  The  First  Rule  In  HoUUn.  Brockie,  vol.  IIL  p.  SOsa.  Luc.  Wadding^  An- 
nalM  Minorum  (till  1540.)  Lngd.  1625».  Svols.  f.  (till  1564.)  Rom.  ITSlse.  19  vols.  C— ViU  3.  Dominid 
by  bis  flrat  follower  Jordantu^  (Acta  SS.  Aug.  vol.  I.  p.  545.)  by  l/umbertus  d«  RomanU,  the  fifth 
gcoenl  of  the  Order.  1254  {lb.  p.  853.)  Others  in  Ilolaten,  Brockie^  toI.  IV.  p.  10.— Jiipoli  et 
BrtfHond^  Bullarium  0.  Praed.  Rom.  1789s8.  6  vols,  t  Mamachii  aliornmq.  Annales  O.  Pracdica- 
torum.  Rom.  1746.  f.    Quetif  et  Echard,  Scrr.  O.  Praed.  Par.  1719s8.  2  volsi  t 

IL  Lefendo  dorie,  on  aommalre  de  rili»t  dcs  Andres  niendians.  Amst  1734.  12.  {Alemherf) 
Blit  des  MoineA  mend.  Par.  1768.  12.  Nuremb.  1769.  E.  Vofft,  d.  h.  Fr.  v.  Asa.  Tub.  1840.  E,  Cha- 
H%  de  Jfnlan,  Hist  de  8.  Franp.  d^Asa.  Par.  1S41.  Manlch«  1S42.  [A  life  uf  Francis  of  A.  is  given 
\n  BohrinQfr's  Church  of  Christ,  Ac,  See  §  -i92.]—Lacordaire,  Vie  de  S.  Dom.  Par.  1840.  Landsb. 
1841.  [^  P.  Day,  Monastic  Instilutiona.  Lond.  1S46.  2  ed.  12.  Fox's  Monks  and  Monasteries.  Lond. 
ISK.    SUph^M,  (in  Edinb.  Rev.  1847.  and  Eclectic  Mag.  Sept  1847.)  Fr.  of  Ass.  Ac] 

The  enthusiasm  which  properly  belongs  to  the  Church,  and  yet  frequently 
endangered  her  existence,  was  finally  attained  and  enlisted  in  her  service, 
througli  the  exertions  of  some  very  peculiar  characters.  When  Francisco  of 
Asasi  (b.  1172)  heard  (1208),  in  the  church  dedicated  to  Mary  at  Portiuncula, 
the  words  in  which  our  Lord  sent  forth  his  disciples  to  preach  the  gospel,  an 
idea  was  revived  wliich  he  had  entertained  among  his  indistinct  youthful 
aspirations.  This  was  the  i)roject  of  an  association  wliich  should  walk 
strictly  in  the  footsteps  of  the  apostles,  preaching  repentance  in  every  part  of 
the  world,  despising  all  kinds  of  private  property  or  possesijions,  and  obtain- 
ing the  necessaries  of  life  from  the  charities  of  their  fellow-men.  At  first  he 
was  despised  by  his  fellow-citizens,  execrated  by  his  wealthy  father,  and 
while  travelling  through  Western  Europe  and  Egypt  ridiculed  as  a  victim  of 
insanity.  It  was  not  long,  however,  before  his  unflinching  contempt  of  the 
world,  his  honest  humility,  his  burning  love  to  God,  and  his  imitation  of  Jesus 
Christ  in  a  remarkable  style  of  living,  (/i)  drew  around  him  thousands  of  dis- 
ciples. The  law  to  which  they  vowed  allegiance  required  love,  humility, 
pOTerty,  and  joy  in  Christ.  To  a  degree  which  had  never  before  been  wit- 
nessed on  earth,  it  now  became  a  luxury  to  share  in  the  earthly  sorrows  and 
possion  of  our  Lord.  The  brown  capoch  or  frock,  which,  according  to  the 
^*8hion  of  the  country,  was  fastened  to  the  waist  with  a  cord,  formed  all  the 
clothing  which  they  deemed  necessary,  and  constituted  the  honorable  badge 
0^  the  order.    Innocent  III.  was  induced  by  the  simplicity  and  humility  of 

*)  This  view  waa  carried  to  Its  nltlmate  point  in  the  40  Conformities  of  Btirtholomaei  Albicii 
(^  Pi»ls)  Liber  Confonnitatum,  13S5,  and  acknowledged  by  the  General  Chapter  at  Awisl,  1899. 
''•^L  1510.  t  and  often.  Extracts  by  Erasmus  AlberuA,  with  a  Preface  by  Luther :  Der  Bar- 
"*^  Munetie  Ealenfipiegel  a.  Alcoran.  1531.  UAIcoran  des  Cordeliers.  Gen.  15&C  in  Lat  and 
''^cL  Amst  nSk  2  ToU. 


I 


296  MEDIAEVAL  CIIUKCH  HISTORY.    PEK,  IV.    A.  D.  1216-151T. 

this  strange  saint  to  allow  him  to  consammate  his  plans  without  Intermption 
(1209).  (b)  Honorius  III.  solemnly  confirmed  the  right  of  the  Order  of  the 
Fratrcs  Minores  (1228)  to  preach  and  hear  confessions  in  every  pbice.  A  female 
order  (Ordo  S.  Clarae)  was  also  estahlished  (since  1212)  by  Clnra  of  -!*»«/, 
whoso  disposition  was  similar  to  that  of  Francis,  and  for  whose  followers  the 
latter  was  induced  to  prescribe  a  rule  (1224).  (c)  A  broad  basis  was  finally 
formed  (1221)  for  his  order,  when  he  established  a  fraternity  composed  of 
those  wlio  wished  to  be  his  disciples,  and  yet  were  under  the  necessity  of 
remaining  in  the  midst  of  worldly  employments  (tertius  ordo  de  poenitentia, 
Tertiarii).  {(I)  Whenever  Francisco  attempted  to  pronounce  a  studied  dis- 
course he  was  always  confounded,  but  when  he  spoke  from  a  sndden  impulse, 
his  si)irit  broke  forth  from  the  depths  of  his  heart  like  a  storm.  Like  some 
Minnesinger,  ho  celebrated  the  delicious  raptures  of  heavenly  love  and  the 
devotion  of  all  nature  for  its  Creator,  {e)  Ho  seems  to  have  poss^ssed  a 
childlike  spirit,  which  loved  to  commune  with  all  forms  of  natural  life,  and 
made  him  salute  all  creatures  as  brethren  and  sisters.  After  many  vain  long- 
ings to  die  in  proof  of  his  love,  he  perceived  tlint  he  was  to  become  like  the 
crucified  Redeemer,  not  by  a  bodily  martyrdom,  but  by  the  intensity  of  his 
devotion.  lie  at  hist  died  lying  naked  on  the  ground  in  his  favorite  diurch 
(Oct.  4,  122G),  with  the  five  wounds  of  Christ  imprinted  on  his  body.  (/) 
The  biographies  of  St.  Francis  were  at  un  early  period  highly  adorned  by 
the  extravagant  fancies  of  his  followers.  Even  then  among  his  immediate 
attendants  many  legends  were  received  and  sent  forth  to  the  world,  and  yet 
we  are  compelled  to  believe  that  this  seraphic  stranger  upon  eartli  really 
experienced  many  tilings  out  of  the  ordinary  course  of  nature. — Ikuningo 
(b.  1170),  a  Castilian  and  a  canon  of  Osma,  was  a  man  of  a  thoughtful 
spirit,  which  in  its  cultivation  and  profound  emotions  sympathized  intensely 
with  the  welfare  and  miseries  of  his  fellow-men.  Deeply  afiected  when  he 
heard  of  the  growth  of  heresy,  he  undertook  a  journey  in  the  manner  of  the 
I>rimitive  apostles  into  difierent  parts  of  the  south  of  France  (after  1206), 
that  he  might  etfect  the  conversion  of  the  Albigenses.  On  him  and  his  assist- 
ants in  this  enterprise,  Innocent  imposed  (1215)  the  rule  of  Augustine,  and 
Honorius  (1210)  conferred  on  them  the  privilege  of  exercising  a  general  pas- 
toral care  in  the  character  of  preaching  friars  (Fratres  praedicatores,  in 
France  Jacobins).  Even  nuns,  principally,  at  first,  such  as  had  been  con- 
verted from  the  Albigensian  faith,  placed  themselves  under  his  rule,  and  at  a 
later  period  a  chiss  of  Tertiarians  (Fratres  et  sorores  de  militia  Christi)  be- 
came connected  with  his  order.  The  leading  principle  of  the  order  was,  the 
sacrifice  of  the  dearest  objects  for  the  promotion  of  the  saving  faith,  and  the 
means  which  its  members  used  were  a  learned  education,  holy  eloquence, 
and  the  restoration  of  the  priesthood  to  its  original  all-subduing  poverty. 

h)  Mat  Purii  ad  onn.  1227.  p.  2-St.       c)  In  IMsUn,  BrockU  vol.  III.  p.  84ss. 

d)  IfoUten.  BrockU  vol.  III.  p.  89d8. 

€)  Lk>bi«kau)pftf  des  h.  Fntna  Der  h.  Fr.  als  Troabadoar.  (Der  Katholik  von  Liobcnnann.  1S2& 
IL  4.  N.  Is.)  In  tlie  Appen<lix  in  Vogt 

/)  The  fact  of  the  bacra  aiifjinata  was  proved  by  eyo-witnef^scs ;  the  Log:ond  Is  very  dellcatolj 
hinted  at  by  Celano  (.II,  1.  $  24.)  Conip.  Raynald.  ad  ann.  1287.  N.  CO.  Wadding  ed.  Eom.  vol- 
II.  p.  429. 


CHAF.  III.    ECCLEa  LIFE.    { 265.  MENDICANT  0RDEK8.  297 

No  sooner  had  Dominieua^  in  the  General  Chapter  nt  Bologna  (1220),  effected 
the  pa8:»ige  of  an  act  by  which  his  order  vowed  to  maintain  perpetual  and 
perfect  poverty,  than  he  died  (Aug.  6,  1221),  uttering  anathemas  upon  any 
who  should  pollute  his  order  by  bestowing  upon  it  earthly  possessions. — The 
constitution  of  these  two  orders  was  developed,  so  far  as  related  to  essential 
matters,  in  a  similai*  manner.    A  Guardian,  who  among  the  Doniinio(ms  was 
called  a  Prior,  presided  over  a  convent,  a  Provincial  was  placed  over  all  the 
convents  in  a  country,  and  a  General  (minister  generalis)  residing  at  Rome 
was  over  the  whole  order.     Each  of  these  officers  had  the  counsel  and 
inspection  of  certain  Definatores,  who  represented  the  several  congregations 
imder  their  jurisdiction.    The  principal  superintendence  and  legislation  was 
vested  in  the* provincial  convents,  and  for  the  whole  order  in  the  General 
Chapter.    Although  these  mendicant  orders  were  freed  from  the  ordinary 
cares  of  secular  life,  they  were  thrown  into  frequent  contact  with  the  people. 
They,  in  contrast  with  the  cathedral  chapters,  presented  to  those  possessed 
of  eminent  talents  and  merit  a  path  by  which  the  highest  dignities  of  the 
Church  might  be  attained.    As  they  possessed  the  right  to  receive  confes- 
sioiB  wherever  they  might  be,  they  soon  became  the  spiritual  advisers  of 
the  whole  Church,  for  they  were  often  intrusted  with  secrets  which  persons 
would  not  confide  to  their  own  pastors  at  home.    In  this  way  they  easily 
found  occasion  to  interfere  in  all  the  relations  of  families,  cities,  and  states,  {j) 
As  their  table  was  every  where  spread,  they  could  admit  vast  multitudes  to 
their  order.     Many  convents  indeed  amassed  by  begging  much  wealth,  the 
possession  of  which  was  reconciled  with  their  vows  of  poverty  by  the  fact 
that  it  was  owned  not  by  individuals,  but  by  the  general  body.     With  the 
papal  court  they  were  united  by  the  bonds  of  a  reciprocal  interest,  and  hence 
the  mendicant  friars  were  regarded  by  the  pope  as  his  standing  army,  and  by 
various  kinds  of  charters  they  were  exalted  above  the  episcopal  clergy.  {K) 
But  this  exaltation  above  the  more  ancient  orders,  their  encroachments  upon 
the  spiritual  duties  of  pastors  and  the  jurisdiction  of  the  universities,  and 
the  complete  viol  ition  of  all  privileges  previously  possessed,  provoked  a  per- 
tnfiuent  and  often  stormy  opposition.     William  of  St.  Amour  became  the 
leader  of  their  opponents,  and  pointed  out  the  dangers  to  which  the  Church 
^as  exi)08ed  on  account  of  this  foolish  system  of  sanctified  beggary.    Al- 
though such  men  as  Thomas  and  Bonatentura  defended  the  higher  objects 
contemplated   by  their  orders  with   consummate  ability,  even  they  were 
ohliged  to  concede  that  such  bodies  were  very  likely  to  become  worldly- 
minded,  and  to  be  perverted  from  their  true  design.  (/)    Hence,  although  the 
mendicant  orders  were  at  first  regarded  as  instruments  for  restoring  the 
Church  to  its  primitive  vigor,  and  were  hailed  as  a  new  establishment  of  the 


9)  Mat  ParU  %A  ann.  1259.  p.  850.  «1  ann.  1243.  p.  414.  ad  ann.  1246.  p.  405ss. 

")  Stnm.  Roderiei  nova  Col.  prlvilegiorum  apost  Bcgulariam  mendicantium  et  non  mend. 
Aatu.ie28.f 

*)  GuiUlm,  de  periculis  novlMlmomra  temp.  1256.  (0pp.  Constant.  1632.  4.    Brotcn,  Api»end.  ad 
"*•'*''•  expet  et  fugiend.  p.  18.)     Thomaa:  contra  rotrahentes  a  religionls  Ingre.vu.    Contra  Im- 
P'^'^ites  D«l  cultum,  (0pp.  Par.  vol.  XX.)    Bonavtntura :  L.  apol.  in  eo«,  qui  Onllnl  Mln.  ndver 
*•"*"'•   I)«  p«Qi)crtate  Christ!  c.  Qnllelmum.    Expoaitio  in  regulam  Fratrum  minor.  (Opp.  Lngd. 
l«*i  Tol.  ViL)    Buiaei  I  c  vol  IIL  p.  2608at 


298  MEDIAEVAL  CUUBCH  UI8T0BT.    PEB.  IT.    A.  a  lUt-lBlT. 

power  of  the  I^teran,  they  really  prodnced  a  great  dissennon  amoDg  aD  tlw 
elements  of  ecclesiastical  life.    The  two  orders  were  themielves  often  broa^ 
into  collision  with  each  other  in  consequence  of  the  identity  of  their  worldly 
objects.     Mntual   jealousies  were  exhibited  in  attempts  to  disparage  om 
another,  and  in  doctrinal  disputations,  so  that  it  was  soon  evident  that  tbdr 
interests  were  in  different  directions.    The  Dominicans,  in  conseqnenoe  of 
their  control  over  the  inquisition,  and  their  possession  of  the  confidence  of 
the  higher  classes,  obtained  ascendency  by  inspiring  a  dread  of  their  power 
and  their  political  influence  ;  but  the  Minorites  possessed  the  affections  of  the 
people,  and  in  consequence  of  their  Portiuneuta^indulgencea  and  their  legen- 
dary glory,  their  order  was  supposed  to  possess  more  than  common  power  in 
conferring  absolution  for  sins.  (I')    At  an  early  period  of  their  existence  the 
Dominicans  ]>erceived  that  they  could  never  attain  their  objects  withoat  t 
scientific  character,  and  hence,  in  1280,  they  secured  for  themselves  a  theo- 
logical chair  in  the  University  of  Paris.    The  Minorites  soon  followed  thdr 
example. — St.  Francis  himself  lived  to  see  the  origin  and  progress  of  a  party 
under  the  guidance  of  Llias  of  Cortona^  combining  eminent  scientific  acquire- 
ments and  wealth  in  the  service  of  the  holy  cause.    On  the  other  hand,  Ja- 
thony  of  Padaa  (d.  1281),  in  the  true  spirit  of  his  master,  thought  salvatioii 
possible  only  to  those  who  were  simple-hearted  and  separated  from  the 
world,  an<l  when  ho  could  obtain  no  audience  for  such  doctrines  among  his 
fellow-nicn,  ho  sought  consolation  by  preaching  to  the  fishes.     For  many 
years  the  two  parties  contended  for  supremacy  in  Uie  order.    Elias  was  twice 
elected  Cieneral,  was  twice  deposed  from  that  office,  and  finally,  having  fallen 
out  with  tlio  i)ope  (^1244),  he  connected  himself  with  the  party  of  Frederic 
II.  (/)     Victory  at  last  decided  in  favor  of  this  milder  party  (Fratres  de  com- 
munitate),  since  its  principles  afforded  opportunity  to  combine  the  reputation 
of  a  mendicant  order  with  the  power  and  wealth  of  the  world.    On  the 
other  hand,  those  in  whom  the  bold  spirit  of  their  founder  continued  (Zda- 
tores.  Spirit oales),  refused  even  to  possess  property  in  common.    The  pope^a 
decision  was  given  in  favor  of  the  victorious  party  from  regard  to  a  distinc- 
tion between  a  possession  in  fee  simple  and  a  possession  of  usufruct,  and  abo 
to  the  fact  that  the  ownership  of  the  entire  property  of  the  Minorites  was 
ostensibly  coiitorred  u[)en  the  Roman  Church,  {m)    With  the  courage  of  men 
who  had  nothing  to  lose,  the  Spirituales  then  turned  their  reproaches  upon 
the  Roman  Church  itself,  and  as  their  demand  that  the  order  should  be  sab- 
jected  to  the  rule  of  absolute  poverty  was  in  glaring  contrast  with  the 
wealth  of  the  clergy,  and  as  their  voluntary  rejection  of  all  earthly  posses- 
sions was  seen  in  the  midst  of  a  Church  filled  with  quarrels  for  this  very 
kind  of  spoil,  a  hope  was  indulged  that  St.  Francis  was  about  to  effect 
through  them  a  great  reformation  of  the  Church.    This  hope  was  in  some 
degree  sustained  by  a  prophecy  of  the  Abbot  JtHuhim  of  Floris  in  Calabria 
(d.  1202),  who,  being  full  of  grief  for  the  corruptions  of  the  Church,  pre- 


k)  Acta  SS.  OcL  vol.  II.  p.  S97s8l— Cyprian  th«  Yoanger  (of  DantzicX  krit  Gescb.  d^  Port  Ab> 
iMM^  1794. 

I)  Wadding  vol.  I.  p.  8<S0.  vol  II.  p.  160.  vol  III.  p.  S4  101.  312. 

»»)  Greg.  IX.  a.  1'231.  {Rodtriei  L  t  p.  Tsa.)    Jnnoc  IV.  a.  lW5t  (/6.  p,  la) 


CHAP.  nL    SOCLES.  LIFE.    {8681  DIVISIONS  AMONG  THE  FK A NCISCANS.      299 

dieted  that  it  would  be  subverted  and  then  be  gloriously  renewed,  according 
to  the  figures  of  the  Apocalypse,  at  the  commencement  of  the  third  ago  of 
the  world,  which  he  placed  in  the  year  1260.  (w)  An  Introduction  to  that 
Ererlaating  Got^jtel^  (o)  which  was  to  come  in  the  place  of  the  gospel  of 
Christ  which  then  prevailed  and  wliich  was  originally  intended  only  as  a 
preparation  und  symbol  of  the  truth,  was  published,  and  announced  that  the 
period  then  passing  was  the  age  of  the  Holy  Spirit,  which  had  commenced 
with  the  labors  of  St.  Francis  and  his  genuine  disciples.  Tliose  who  put 
confidence  in  such  predictions  were  in  no  wise  perplexed  when  the  period 
assigned  for  these  wonderful  revelations  had  i>assed.  The  Spirituales  were 
united  by  Cdestine  V,  into  a  congregation  of  poor  Cclestine-Eremites. 
Boniface  VIII,  dissolved  this  association  (1802).  John  XXII,  surrendered 
the  Spirituales,  and  especially  the  lay  brethren  among  them  (Fratricelli),  into 
the  hands  of  the  Inquisition  (alter  1818).  Many  of  them  joyfully  gave  up 
their  lives  in  the  flames,  because  they  were  determined  to  possess  no  pro- 
perty on  earth.  (;>)  But  even  the  other  Minorites,  having  satisfied  their  con- 
flciences  by  an  apparent  surrender  of  their  possessions  into  the  hands  of  the 
Romish  Church,  were  zealous  in  maintaining  against  the  Dominicans,  that 
Christ  and  the  apostles  owned  no  property  in  common.  John  XXII.  rejected 
this  assertion  as  heretical,  and  formally  renounced  the  property  of  the  Fran- 
ciscans, which  as  a  mere  pretence  his  predecessors  had  held  (1822).  {q)  By 
this  means  the  order  lost  a  portion  of  its  members,  who,  with  Michael  of 
Ceneua^  their  gei^eral,  took  refuge  with  the  Emperor  Louis,  and  defended  his 
cause  against  the  popes.  On  the  death  of  Louis  the  Spirituales  wandered 
about  as  fugitives,  and  founded  a  few  settlements.  They  were  often  over- 
thrown, but  were  invincible  by  mere  force,  and  at  last  most  of  them  became 
reconciled  to  the  Church  in  consequence  of  some  concessions  made  to  them. 
At  Constance  especially,  they,  together  with  the  Conventuals,  who  regarded 
their  possessions  as  still  belonging  to  the  donors,  were  recognized  under  the 
name  of  the  Brethren  of  the  Rigid  Observance,  with  superiors  of  their 
own.  {t, — The  most  celebrated  doctors  of  the  thirteenth  and  fourteenth  cen- 
turies were  mendicant  friars.  But  when,  in  the  fifteenth  century,  the  hier- 
archy were  surpassed  in  attainments  by  the  classes  in  the  interests  of  science, 
the  mendicant  friars  became  the  principal  opponents  of  the  latter,  and  the 
champions  of  every  Romish  abuse,  and  made  use  of  every  artifice  to  keep 
the  people  in  the  immaturity  of  a  superstitious  dependence.    But  the  master 


»»)  Dc  Concordia  atriuftqne  Teat  Expoeitio  Apocal  Ven.  1519.  Psalterlam  decern  cliordar.  Ven. 
1527.  4.  Comp.  Acta  SS.  M»j.  vol.  VII.  p.  98ss.  Engelhardi^  Juach.  u.  d.  ew.  Ev.  (KGesch.  Ab- 
bandlL  ErL  18:82.  N.  I.)  C  U.  Ifahn,  die  apokal.  Lebren  d.  Joacb.  v.  Flor.  (Stad.  a.  krlt  1849.  H 
8.)  Abt.  PLil.  d.  IIohcnsL  p.  31288. 

o)  IntnHluct(»riu!i  In  Ev.  acteruum,  by  Gerhard^  tbe  confidant  of  John  of  Parma,  a  General  Bub- 
soqaently  dei>oi^ed.  about  12M.  Since  deHtroye«1,  trith  the  exception  of  some  Extracts  in  Argentri^ 
Col  Judioionim  <le  novls  err.  Par.  ITiSsa.  vol.  L  p.  163^8.  Eccard  voL  II.  p.  84988.  In  a  similar 
■pirit  Olimf.  (d.  1297.)  Postiiia  supor  Apoc  Extracts  in  Balveil  Miscell.  L  L  p.  S18s8.  [C.  Uahn, 
Geicb.  d.  Kotzer  im  MA.  Stuttg.  1852.  8  vols.] 

p)  MoHhemii  Instltt  IT.  ecc  Cent  XIV.  Chap.  II.  %  26.  note  tc. 

q)  Balutii  Vitae  Pap.  Aven.  vol  I.  p^  59a  JSktrav.  Joan.  XXII.  Tit  K  c  2b8.  Wadding 
rol  VI.  p.  3948. 

r)  Seas.  XIX.  {Ifanlt  vol.  IV.  p.  51S.) 


300  MEDIAEVAL  CITURCII  HISTOUY.    Ph^R.  IV.    A.  D.  1216-161T. 

minds  of  this  period  combined  with  their  old  adversaries  to  expose  to  gene- 
ral scorn  their  intellectual  shallowness,  their  stupidity,  their  covetousnesa, 
and  their  atfected  clamor  about  heresy. 

§  26G.     Public  Worship. 

Holiness,  during  this  period,  was  generally  looked  upon  as  a  mere  external 
thing.  Even  in  the  fourth  century  the  hermits  of  the  Thebais,  and  some  others, 
had  been  in  the  habit  of  reckoning  the  number  of  their  pater-nost<;rs  by  some 
external  token,  (a)  This  formality  in  prayer  received  a  definite  form  and 
predominant  reference  to  the  divine  Mother,  when  the  Dominicans  intro- 
duced the  rosanj  (Rosarium)  into  general  use.  Public  worship  consisted 
almost  entirely  in  the  offering  of  the  i/rtw,  which  professed  to  be  the  celebra- 
tion of  a  present  incarnate  Deity,  but  in  fact  it  often  degenerated  into  a  work 
of  superstition,  perverted  by  unbelief  to  purposes  of  gain.  Tlie  business  of 
instruction,  however,  was  not  altogether  neglected  by  the  Church,  especially 
on  the  part  of  the  itinerant  mendicant  friars,  whoso  hearers  were  frequently 
so  numerous  that  no  temple  but  that  of  God  under  the  open  heavens  was 
sufficient  to  contain  them.  The  discourses  of  many  preachers  abounded  in 
scholastic  learning  or  fantastic  conceits,  but  there  were  also  some  who  pro- 
claimed the  word  of  God  in  a  popular  style.  Thus  the  Dominican  John  of 
Vicenza  (about  1230)  became  distinguished  for  his  eloquence,  and  before  he 
allowed  himself  to  become  an  object  of  ridicule  by  meddling  witli  miracles 
and  political  affairs,  he  was  an  eminent  peacemaker  between  the  numerous 
factions  which  then  distracted  Italy.  (//)  Thus  also  Bcrthold  of  Ratisbon  (d. 
1272)  powerfully  aroused  the  rude  and  hardened  consciences  of  his  hearers, 
and  urged  upon  them  the  duty  of  worshii)ping  God  in  spirit.  (>)  Gailer^ 
also,  of  KaiHcrahcrg  (d.  1510),  whose  own  heart  was  pervaded  by  a  sincere 
love  of  perfection,  assailed  the  follies  of  the  world  and  of  the  Churcli  with 
the  w^eapons  of  the  keenest  wit.  (//)  Gabriel  of  Burletta  (about  1470),  a 
Neapolitan  preaching  friar,  presented  a  specimen  of  this  humorous  style  of 
popular  i)reaching,  in  which  the  speaker  sometimes  gave  to  his  discourses 
even  the  ordinary  comic  flavor,  (c)  This  kind  of  address  was  thought  to  be 
especially  allowable  during  the  Easter  festival,  when,  according  to  a  preva- 
lent custom,  the  roughest  jests  were  tolerated  even  in  the  puli)it  to  excite 
what  was  called  the  Easter  laugh.  (/)  As  none  but  the  clergy  took  part  in 
the  public  services,  the  hymns  used  in  the  Church  remained  without  alteration 
in  the  Latin  language.  In  addition  to  those  which  had  been  used,  some  of  a 
tender  character  composed  among  the  Franciscans  were  generally  adopted 


a)  Pidladii  Hist  Laus.  c.  23.  Sozom.  H.  ecc  VI,  29.  MabiUon,  Ann.  O.  Bcne<i  v«»L  IV.  p. 
462fl.    Acta  8S.  O.  Benod.  Pracf.  ad  Saec.  V.  N.  258!<. 

b)  Original  authorities  in  liaumer^  Gej?ch.  cL  Ilohenst  vol.  III.  |».  SOSss. 

c)  Bortliold  des  Franc.  Predigten,  th.  vollstiindig,  th.  in  Auszugen,  cdiL  by  KUng,  Borl.  18M. 
Conip.  Wiener  Jahrb.  IS-ir*.  vol.  82.  p.  1948St 

d)  Wclu<i>icgol  d.  i.  Predigten  fi.  SebiwL  Brands  Xarrenschiff.  Bas.  1574  and  oflcn.— /:  IT.  PK  t. 
AminojL,  O.  v.  K.  Lcbin,  lA-lircn  u.  Prc<l.  Erl.  1S26.  A.  Stro<ber,  E«at  hist  sur  la  vie  ct  les  ccriti 
do  G.  do  K.  Straob.  1S34.  4. 

f)  Semnn.  quailrigosimalea.  Brcsc.  1497.  and  numerous  collections  of  his  dij*conrBc»,  espociallj 
that  of  Ven.  IST'.  2  xoU.—Bfituni/nrtfn,  Nachr.  v.  Merkw.  Buchern.  vol.  VII.  p.  124sa. 

/)  Fu«9li,  Bcltr.  z,  K.  u.  Ref.  Gosch.  vol.  V.  p.  447sa.    Hist  pollt  Blutler.  1S89.  voL  IV.  H.  6^ 


CHAP.  IlL    ECCLES.  LIFE.    §  266.  FESTIVALS.    JUBILEE.  301 

by  the  Chnrch.     Congregational  singing,  in  which  the  people  took  part,  had 
its  origin  in  the  extraordinary  festivals  and  among  the  Fraternities,  where 
the  congregations  participated  more  than  usual  in  the  services.     In  Germany 
it  especially  grew  out  of  the  Kyric  Eleison,  which  was  anciently  sung  hy  the 
people  in  full  chorus  as  a  Refrain,  (ff)    During  the  fourteenth  century  the 
festival  of  the  Immaculate  Conception  (§  225)  was  more  and  more  observed, 
and  the  doctrine  which  it  commemorated  became,  through  the  influence  of 
St.  Thomas  a  party  question  between  the  Dominicans  and  the  Franciscans. 
Great  agitations  were  produced  by  the  discussion  of  this  question  in  the  Uni- 
versity of  Paris,  but  finally  that  body  (1387)  and  Clement  VI 1.  (1389),  who 
was  carried  awav  bv  its  influence,  declared  themselves  in  favor  of  the  doc- 
trine  because  they  regarded  it  as  most  favorable  to  the  interests  of  the  Church 
and  of  true  piety.  (/<)     In  Berne  the  Dominicans  supported  their  side  of  the 
controversy  by  causing  an  image  of  the  Virgin  to  shed  tears  of  blood,  by 
producing  letters  from  glorified  saints,  and  by  branding  a  deluded  man  with 
certain  marks  in  imitation  of  the  wounds  of  Christ.     The  tissue  of  deceit, 
stnpidity  and  crime,  by  which  these  things  were  rendered  plausible,  was 
finally  exposed  to  public  scorn,  a  legate  presided  over  the  spiritual  court  ap- 
pointed for  an  investigation  of  the  affair,  and  four  of  the  principal  agents  in 
it  were  burned  (1609).  (/)     The  doctrine  of  a  change  of  the  sacramental 
bread  into  the  body  of  the  incarnate  Lord  was  celebrated  on  the  festival  of 
Corpus  Christi  (F.  corporis  Domini).     This  festival,  which  originated  in  con- 
nection with  numerous  dreams  and  visions  in  the  diocesan  church  of  Liege, 
over  which  he  had  formerly  presided.  Urban  IV.  proclaimed  (1204)  as  a  gen- 
eral festival  of  the  Church.     It  was,  however,  generally  neglected  by  his 
snccessors,  and  was  merely  re-established  by  Clement  V.  as  the  festival  of 
the  grand  miracle  in  which  was  displayed  the  highest  glory  of  the  Church,  (a*) 
Kear  the  close  of  the  thirteenth  century  a  report,  the  origin  of  which  was 
unknown,  generally  prevailed  in  the  city  of  Rome,  that  according  to  a  cus- 
tom remembered  by  some  very  aged  people,  a  centennial  indulgence  might 
be  obtained  in  the  church  of  St.  Peter  on  the  occurrence  of  the  Jubilee  Year, 
ISOO.    Boniface  VIII.  was  induced  by  the  vast  concourse  of  devout  persons 
who  on  this  account  thronged  the  city,  to  bestow  upon  all  who,  in  a  i)eniten- 
tial  spirit,  sliould  on  this  tjrar  of  Juhllce  visit  the  churches  of  the  ai)ostles,  a 
complete  pardon  for  the  sins  of  the  wliole  previous  life.     Hundreds  of  thou- 
sands flocked  to  Rome,  so  that  people  were  compelled  to  acknowledge  that 
the  whole  human  race  was  Romish,  and  like  one  great  family  assembled 
aronnd  its  common  father.     Hence,  in  consideration  of  the  brevity  of  human 
life,  and  the  benefit  of  the  Roman  people,  Clement  VI.  (1342)  decreed  that 


V)  If.  Ilnfmann,  Oi»ch  d.  dcut.  KLlc«lo5  b.  LtiUicr.  BroRl.  15:^2.  F.  Woff,  u.  die  Lois,  Se- 
loenren  u.  Lcicbc  IleiUelb.  1S41.    ('.  Ftants,  Grsch.  d.  gclstl.  Licdertexte  vor.  d.  KcC  llalbrft 

*)  Thomatt,  Suinina.  P.  III.  Qu.  27.  Art  Iss.  Di'ix^  Scotiis  In  Sentt  L.  HI.  Dist.  3.  Qu.  1.  $  9. 
^  !*•  Qu.  1.  J  \Z.—Bula<i  1.  c,  vol.  IV.  p.  ClSss.    Argentrc  I,  c.  voL  I.  P,  II.  p.  Gls-s. 

i)  AnnhelnVs  Bi'mej  Chronlk,  edit  by  StUrUin,  vol.  III.  p.  869sa.  vol.  IV.  p.  Iss.  Jlottinger,  U 
•**•  P-  V,  p.  8Wsa. 

*^  «'<>.  ffoc«^miu«  (about  1*48),  gcsta  Pontiff.  I^odiens.  c.  6.  {ChfipeavUli  ge^tor.  Pontiff.  Leod 
•^^  toL  IL  p.  298.)  Aovii  Ann.  atl  ann.  1280.  N.  1&  Acta  88.  Apr.  voL  I.  p.  443.  Both  bulls: 
^"•^t /iZ  Tit  Id. 


302  MEDIAEVAL  CHTJRCII  HISTORY.    PER.  IV.    A.  D.  121«-1M: 

the  festival  of  tbe  Year  of  Jubilee  should  be  celebrated  every  f 
Urban  VI.  (1880)  reduced  the  interval  to  88,  and  Paul  II.  ( 
years.  (/)  From  these  pageantries  in  public  worship  were  final] 
the  representation  of  sacred  dramas  in  the  fonn  of  Mysteries  anc 
enacted  by  clergymen,  students,  or  fraternities,  frequently  with  a 
of  popular  comic  parts,  but  always  as  a  mode  of  divine  worship. 

§  2G7.    FloitrUhing  Periad  of  the  Imitatite  Arts  in  the  C 

VamH,  le  vite  de'  pittorl.  srciiitetti  o  Bcultorl  ital.  Fir.  8  P.  1&50.  4.  and  often.  / 
Uebers.  v.  Schom  u.  FornUr^  Btuttc  1S82-49.  6  vols,  [nnd  transl.  into  Enpl.  Vatar 
Painters  Ate  In  BoIin'&  Stand  Lib.  Lond.  5  vola.  8.]  fitrmtT  d'Aginconri^lWA 
monamcii^.  Par.  et  Stnub.  1>!23.  [traniJ.  ft,  tlic  Fr.  Hist  of  Art,  Ac  1  vol  Lond.  lS4i 
UebtfR'iclitMaf.  z.  Oewh.  d.  nca.  Kunst  b.  Rafut-l.  Dre»d.  1S27.  t  F.  KngUr,  Ilandb. 
Stuttg.  ISl'i.  {Kugler't  Hist  Manual  cif  Sculp.  Paint.  Arch.  anc.  and  mod.  In 
Lond.  2  vols.  £i.  IS^Vi.]  //.  iHU,  Abriw  c.  kircbl.  Kunst-ArcbacoL  d.  M.\.  d.  d€ 
Nonlbaun.  (1842.)  \^V&.  C.  S<'hintaii^,  QeMb.  d.  bild.  K&nMc  in  MA.  DAweld.  11 
Kinktl^  GeM-Ii.  d.  bild.  Kunstc  b.  d.  dir.  Viilk.  Uiinn.  1S45.— (7  F.  r.  Rumohi 
un;;cn.  Brl.  l'»27!«.  8  vols.  K  For^Ur^  GvrcIi.  d.  dcutficbcn  KuiisL  Lpz.  1f<51-58.  S 
vi^rf.  (If  Quiui'!/,  Illst  de  lu  \1o  et  des  «»uvraci'5  des  plus  ct-lubrcs  arcbitectrt  da 
la  fin  du  XVI I L  al.  2.  Par.  1>^*)3.  8  voI«.  Uobcrs.  v.  Ileldmann,  DanmL  1S81.  S 
/(T,  Dcnkmuliler  (L  dcut.tvh.  Dank.  12  U.  Darni»t.  1816tK.  new  &4>rios.  1S21b\  t  [ti 
Memorial  of  Anc.  Gcr.  Golb.  Arch.  &c.  Lon«L  2  voh.]  Sulp.  Boit'Mref,  Denkma 
Nie<lerrliein.  Miinicli,  ISiiS.  f.  R  Stark,  Horn  u.  Koln  o.  d.  Entwlckl.  d.  clir.  Germa 
u.  Krit  I&Al.  H.  2. — Civtfgnnra^  8toria  della  ncultnra  dal  fruo  ri^on.'lmontci  in  ItaL  • 
Napoleont*.  Ven.  IS18>fi.  8  voK  t—Ltmai,  Storla  pittorica  dclla  ItaL  ed.  t^.  Ua^sana  li 
1SI7.  6  voU  16.  [II Ut.  of  Painting  in  Upper  and  Lower  Italy,  fVoin  tlic  Ital.  of  Ijini 
Ixjnil.  1S17.  8  voU]  Kiiffler,  Gcscli.  d.  Malerel.  vol.  I.  p.  IOS.ns.  [II.  of  Painting.  1 
Germ.  «»r  Kupk-r  by  Fnnttate  and  Head.  Lond.  1S42. 1846.]— «/.  //.  H>»*i«*fter#7, 
Const.  1S'J7.  2  voIh.  {J.  r.  Radoicitz)  Ikonograpbiu  <L  Iloiligen.  Brl.  ISSl.  Dfdron 
tlenne.  Par.  1S41.  vol.  I.  [Ctirist.  Icon<tgrapliy,  from  tlie  Fr.  of  Didron  by  ifiliinfft 
2  vok  Lord  Uttdmiy,  II.  of  Cbr.  Art  I^)nd.  1847.  3  vols  8.  F.  Cre^et/ and  G,  L 
of  MA.  L<»nd.  4to.  J.  S.  ,VrinfK,  II.  of  Paint  Sculp,  and  Arch.  B(*ton.  I'^JJl.  12.  A 
Lives  of  eminent  Painterp,  Scnlptor^  and  Arcbitect*.  Lond.  and  New  York-  ISSd. 
Karly  Italian  Painters.  I^md.  Is48.  //.  Shaic,  The  Decorative  Arts  £ccle.s.  and  Ci 
Agea.  Lond.  lbb'2.] 

Among  the  (Jennanic  nations,  the  antique  style  of  ArchiU 
cially  in  its  Byzantine  cliarncter,  had  been  adopted  in  the  erecl 
churches.  I^arrel-shnped  and  cruciform  arclies,  much  depressed, 
rally  adopted  in  their  construction,  as  the  knowledge  of  the  anci 
tions  and  ornaments  had  been  gradually  lost  (portal  of  the  Scot 
tery  at  Ratisbon,  crypt  at  Freysingen).  But  with  tlie  new  life  w 
up  in  the  eleventh  century,  a  i>eculiar  style  of  sacred  archi 
developed  in  consequence  of  the  use  of  the  pointed  arch.  In  a  fc 
this  form  had  been  previously  adopted  as  a  temporary  expedient  ii 
ian  structures  (St.  Lorenzo  of  Subiaco,  847,  Ruins  of  Tusculum),  br 
priate  home  was  among  the  Northern  nations,  with  whoso  poiut< 
admirably  corresponded,  and  yet  required  but  little  counterpoise 


I)  Jticobi  Oijfttini  de  contetiimo  s.  Jubilaeo  anno  Lib.  (Bibl.  PP.  Max.  vol.  XX^ 
tracU  in  liaynaUI.  ad  ann.  1300.  N.  Iss.)  Villani  VIII,  86.  Fxtrav.  comtn.  V.  Til 
naUt.  ad  ann.  1470.  X.  6!i.—Chark  ChaU,  Lett  hist  et  dogm.  snr  lee  Jubilees  et  I< 
Ilaye.  17M.  S  voI»k 

m)  W.  Ihnf^  Ancient  Myaterleiv.  Lond.  lS2a  W.  MarrioU,  Coll.  of  Engl,  mln 
1883.  Monm^rque  et  Michel,  Theatre  fran^ais  an  moycn-fige.  Par.  1830.  Hist  po 
voL  VI.  Tb.  1^  C.  A.  WitUnhaur,  de  artis  scenicae  apud  Germ,  initils.  Boil  la 
Geach.  d.  poet  Nat  Lit  toL  IL  p.  SftCaa. 


CHAP.  IIL    ECCLE8.  UFE.    f  267.  ARCHITECTURE.  303 

which  was  at  first  a  work  of  necessity  soon  became  the  fi'eest  expression  of 
the  heart,  the  vaults  of  the  domes  rose  up  on  every  hand  like  a  stone  forest, 
and  the  tall,  slender  pillars  struggling  upwards,  became  the  typo  of  a  spirit 
aspiring  after  heaven.    The  ground-form  still  continued  to  be  the  Basilica, 
often  in  the  shape  of  the  cross  (in  the  Latin  style),  the  choir  terminating  in 
a  polygon,  as  a  church  of  priests  represented  the  highest  aspiration  of  archi- 
tecture in  the  interior,  and  the  towers  expressed  the  necessary  culminating 
and  final  points  of  the  general  effort.    In  the  fantastic  decorations  of  leaves 
and  flowers,  of  scrolls  and  grotesque  figures,  of  gentle  animals  and  the  old 
conquered  dragon,  wrought  in  stone,  the  abundance  of  nature  as  well  as  of 
the  world  of  fancy,  was  enlisted  in  the  service  of  devotion.    A  mysterious 
light  entered  the  lofty,  sombre  halls  through  painted  windows,  which  were 
the  purest  transparent  representations  of  color,  (a)     Figures  derived  from 
Bicred  history  grew  out  of  the  twisted  columns,  and  scenes  from  profane  and 
eodcfliastical  history  were  represented  by  shepherds  engraved  in  stone,  and 
resting  with  folded  hands  upon  the  tombs  of  saints,  bishops,  and  princes. 
The  Church  was  thus  like  a  new  temple  of  Solomon,  a  typo  of  the  earth 
vitb  all  its  children,  and  the  vault  of  heaven  stretched  above  them.    The 
erection  of  these  sacred  buildings  was  then  a  great  popular  expedient  by 
which  men  could  conquer  a  holy  land  on  their  native  soil,  could  pour  the 
wealth  of  private  life  into  the  house  of  God,  and  transmit  the  vast  plans  of 
one  generation  to  its  successors,  (h)     The  first  stonemasons  and  architects 
came  from  the  monasteries,  and  gradually  lodges  of  freemasons  were  organ- 
ized, in  which  the  results  of  mechanical  skill  were  communicated  from  one 
person  to  another,  and  the  credit  of  the  trade  was  secured,  (c)    In  the  se- 
crecy of  tliese  lodges  an  asylum  was  also  found  for  dispositions  which  rose 
roperior  to  the  contemporary  Church,  and  hence  w^e  find  that  ecclesiastical 
corrnptions  were  sometimes  freely  and  boldly  proclaimed  by  the  stones 
which  compose  the  most  splendid  monuments  of  the  Church  itself.     The 
DKJBt  flourishing  period  of  this  architecture  was  during  the  thirteenth  and 
fourteenth  centuries,  when  Conrad  of  IFochstaden  laid  (1248)  the  foundation 
^ne  of  the  cathedral  of  Cologne,  and  Entin  of  Steiiibach  formed  the  design 
11275)  of  the  tower  of  the  minster  at  Strasburg.  {(t)    During  the  fifteenth 
^tury  it  passed  in  some  measure  into  decay,  not  on  account  of  an  excessive 
Refinement  in  building,  but  because  that  form  of  pious  feeling  which  creates 
wch  works  for  a  distant  future  no  longer  existed  in  the  public  mind,  and  the 
spirit  of  the  middle  ages  was  gone.    This  Germanic  style  of  architecture, 
^hich  since  the  time  of  Vasari  has  received  the  name  of  Gothic,  has  subse- 
^I'lently  prevailed  extensively  in  France,  England,  Spain  and  Sicily.    In  Italy 
^«  sight  of  the  old  Roman  architectural  structures  was  too  overpowering  to 


0)  M.  A.  0es*4ri,  Ocscb.  d.  GlademakreL  Stuttg.  1819.    [Art  of  Painting  on  Glass,  trom  the 

^*««n.  «f  G«tti€rt.  Lend.  1825.  4.] 

*)  Omp.  0.  GrMielsfn  u.  E.  Jfauch,  Ulm's  Knnstlobon  Im  MA.  Ulm.  1<M0. 

0  Comp.  IIeidmani\  die  8  altesten  Denkmale  dcr  tent*chen  Freimanrerbrudcncheft  Aann. 
*».  (1S19.) 

*)  8.fiMMMr€e,  G<>«ch.  u.  Beschr.  d.  Doms  v.  Colin.  Munich,  (1888.)  1842.  ^J.v.  Gdrre*^  der 
^  ▼.  Kolln.  XL  das  MQnster  r.  Strasb.  Eegensb.  1842.  F.  KvffUr,  d.  Dom.  v.  KoUd.  (Deatscha 
^*«t^).  8cbr.  1842,  N.  19.) 


J 


304  MEDIAEVAL  CUURCU  HISTORY.    PEK.  IV.    A.  D.  1216-1517. 

allow  of  its  adoption.  Its  utmost  limits  in  that  direction  are  witnessed  in  the 
whito  marble  mountain  of  the  cathedral  of  Milan,  with  its  host  of  statues, 
where  the  Romish  element  already  begins  to  interfere  with  the  German. 
Every  remnant  of  this  German  style  was  surrendered  when  antique  grandeur 
and  purity  was  introduced  with  the  revival  of  classical  antiquity.  Brunei- 
loico  formed  the  arch  of  the  cupola  of  the  Cathedral  of  Florence  (since  1421), 
and  Julius  11.  laid  the  foundation  of  the  modern  St.  Peter^s  Church  (1506), 
the  beautiful  structure  of  which  was  commenced  after  the  plan  of  Bra- 
mantca^  and  has  been  so  fatal  to  the  interests  of  the  papacy,  but  has  finally 
proved  to  be  its  most  exalted  type,  and  its  proudest  monument,  {e) 

Tlio  Phmiic  Arts,  from  which  Christian  morality  withheld  the  privilege 
of  presenting  any  figures  without  costume  except  those  of  the  martyrs,  were 
developed  in  forming  the  ornaments  and  utensils  of  churches,  and  had  their 
principal  home  in  Florence.  (/)  Nicolas  Pisa  no  (1221-74),  whoso  works 
were  wrought  after  the  models  of  antiquity,  deserves  the  credit  of  being  their 
modern  father.  Lorenzo  Ghiberti  (1378-1455)  cast  in  bronze  the  doors  of 
the  baptistery  in  a  stylo  which  made  them  worthy  of  adorning  the  entrance 
to  Paradise,  but  he  was  an  artistic  painter  in  metals,  and  hence  his  successors 
have  been  much  perplexed  when  they  attempted  to  imitate  him.  During 
the  same  period  every  deliglitfiil  variety  of  nature's  beauties  was  represented 
in  the  i)iire  and  animated  reliefs  of  lAicca  della  liohbia  (1388-1450).  Dona" 
tello  (i383-140G)  made  up  for  his  deficiency  in  depth  of  character  by  his 
passionate  emotion.  Michael  Angelo  (1474-15Gi)  in  his  youth  formed  a 
group  of  tlie  Madonna  with  the  dead  body  of  our  Lord,  in  which  much  feel- 
ing, delicacy,  and  beauty  were  exhibited,  but  at  a  later  period  he  seems  to 
have  despised  all  attempts  to  delineate  subjects  of  Christian  beauty.  His 
mausoleum  of  the  Medici  is  an  embodiment  of  profound  and  petrified 
thoughts,  and  his  Moses  is  a  terrible  representation  of  a  popular  ruler.  On 
the  other  side  of  the  Alps  the  imitative  arts  were  generally  made  subservient 
to  architecture.  From  the  shops  of  the  goldsmiths  and  brasiers  of  that 
period  proceeded  many  careful  imitations  of  ordinary  nature  adapted  to  pious 
uses.  In  this  limited  department  of  art,  Peter  Vischer'^H  Reliquary  of  St. 
Sebaldus  (1506-19)  possesses  an  artistic  excellence  of  the  very  highest  degree. 

Modern  Paintiiuj  originated  in  the  efibrt  to  represent  the  views  which 
are  peculiar  to  Christianity,  and  received  its  highest  cultivation  from  the 
patronage  of  the  Church.  In  the  Western  Church,  it  is  true,  there  were 
some  who  denounced  the  use  of  pictures  and  statues  as  an  unlawfid  indul- 
gence of  the  eyes,  but  generally  it  was  thought  that  the  arts  might  properly 
be  used,  and  the  treasures  of  the  Church  might  bo  worthily  expended  at 
least  in  commemorating  the  saints.  Ecclesiastical  laws  were  therefore 
directed  only  against  those  representations  which  were  thought  to  bo  grossly 
sensual  and  of  a  corrupting  character.    The  pious  feelings  which  found  satis- 


«)  Descrizione  istor  del  piincipio  e  proscguimento  della  fkbrlca  del  dnomo  di  Flrenze.  YXot.  1786L 
Fontuna,  11  Templo  Vatlcano  e  suo  ori^iue.  Itom.  let)-!  f.  Plainer^  d.  neuo  Pct^r&kirche.  (Beechr. 
d.  Stadt  Rom.  vol.  IL  pp.  184-229.) 

/)  CX>inp.  Aug.  Hagen^  die  Cbrunik  8.  Yatentadt  y.  Florontiner  Lor.  GhlbcrtL  (Kanst-Roman)  Lpii 
lS8d.  2  vols. 


CHAP.  IIL    ECCLES.  LIFE.    §  267.  PAINTING.  305 

faction  in  the  nse  of  relics,  obtainod  still  high  t  onjoyineiit  from  an  image  in 
which  we  pogeess  such  a  bciiutifiil  medium  of  connection  betwoou  the  flesh 
and  the  spirit.     The  glorious  forms  in  which  the  martyrs  receive  the  palms 
of  victory  as  they  ascend  to  heaven,  reconcile  us  to  the  repulsive  scenes  in 
the  midst  of  which  their  tortures  are  depicted.    The  old  traditions  (§  189) 
which  had  been  so  prevalent  in  the  ancient  Church,  never  became  entirely 
obsolete  in  Italy.     In  the  mosaic  work  of  the  Roman  churches  are  to  be 
found  specimens  of  paintings  produced  in  almost  every  preceding  century. 
A  very  delicate  and  expressive  style  of  miniature  painting  appears  in  the 
manuscripts  written  in  the  convents  in  the  time  of  the  Saxon  emperors,  {g) 
As  soon  as  intellectual  life  began  to  be  awakened  by  interc  >urse  witli  Con- 
stantinople, Christian  art  also  made  its  appearance  fu'st  among  the  Italians. 
A  corporation  with  a  regular  constitution  was  formed  under  the  i)atronage 
of  St.  Luke  among  that  highly  refined  people,  when  it  advanced  to  its  great- 
est perfection.    The  design  of  the  paintings  obtained  from  Constantinople 
was  generally  grand,  but  the  figures  were  vacant,  nmmmy-like,  and  of  an 
extravagant  size,  but  painted  with  some  degree  of  skill,  and  generally  on  a 
ground  of  gold.    Tlie  school  formed  on  this  model  was  commenced  by  Guido 
of  Siena  (about  1221)  and  Giunta  of  Pisa  (1210-3G),  and  was  completed  by 
C'mahue  (about  1240-1300).      The  divine  Virgin  painted  by  the  latter  in 
Florence  is  noble  and  siiintly,  but  unnatural.     Giotto  (127G-138G)  abandoned 
not  only  the  stiff  manner  but  the  lofty  spirit  of  antiquity,  and  under  the  im- 
pnLie  of  Dante^s  suggestions,  founded  a  peculiar  style  of  It.dian  art  by  imi- 
tating nature  in  her  most  animated  movements.    Not  only  the  commissions 
giTen  but  the  conduct  ])resented  by  the  monks,  afforded  the  artistic  skill  of 
^)$  Floreutine  achool  many  oppjiortunities  to  combine  the  pathetic  with  the 
barlesque  of  ordinary  life.    Even  in  representations  of  Scriptural  history, 
this  school,  which  attained  its  highest  perfection  m  Ihmeuico  Ghirlandaio 
(1451-'j3),  presented  its  scenes  in  a  domestic,  common  style,  so  that  in  its 
ktnds  the  manger  of  Bethlehem  exhibited  simply  a  IHorentine  accouchement. 
^Ainjtlico  of  FicHoIe  (1387-1455)  had  already  introduced  into  his  art  the 
Rgnificance  and  endless  variety  of  human  expression,  and  infused  into  his 
sweet  pictures  the  riches  of  a  heart  at  home  not  only  in  the  convent  but  in 
l»*ven.    lie  was  peculiarly  the  i)aiuter  of  glorified  saints,  and  by  means  of 
l>ii  eraph)yment  enjoyed  communion  with  his  Ix)rd.     Mosmrhio  (1402-43), 
to  whom  was  opened  the  secret  of  the  chiaro  scuro,  returned  again  with  joy 
tobeaatiful  nature,  and  to  tlie  grand  thoughts  of  the  old  ecclesiastical  tradi- 
^.    When  Leonanh}  (1452-1517)  had  j)rolbundly  developed  the  laws  of 
^«  art,  and  even  in  his  Lord's  Supper  (tlie  heads  of  the  ai>ostles  in  TVeimar; 
^  combined  the  charm  of  the  supernatural  with  exalted  individual  beauty^ 
f^liarUdomeo  (14G9-1517)  nobly  and  clearly  delineated  scenes  from  sacred 
^^r^  with  devout  conscientiousness,  and  in  attractive  coloring.    Finally 
*^katl  Angeh^  by  his  gigantic  power  and  thorough  knowledge  of  nature, 
^®^*nie  the  painter  of  the  Old  Testament,  because  no  subjects  seemed  wor- 
^y  of  bis  master  pencil  but  the  prophets  of  olden  time  and  the  tremendous 


^  fi<c<,  Eatai  sur  l*art  de  vurillcr  TAge  des  miniatures  peintes  dans  lee  Inanu^criuv  Tar. 
Halt 

20 


306  MEDIAEVAL  CIIUIICII  HISTORY.    PER  IV.    A.  D.  1216-ldlT. 

sconea  of  the  Last  Judgment.    Even  the  Lomhardic  school  had  its  origin  in  the 
Church.     But  although  Moniegnn^  occasionally  with  sacred  earnestness,  and 
Bellini^  with  cheerful  loveliness,  have  given  us  pictures  of  heavenly  and 
saintly  forms,  the  most  perfect  specimens  of  this  school  are  hrilliant  repre- 
sentations of  attractive  sensuous  beauty  and  repuhlican  glory.    In  Gemiany^ 
a  national  school  of  Christian  painting  was  formed  at  first  on  the  Lower 
Iwhine,  and  afterwards  at  Nuremburg,  whose  subjects  were  generaUy  taken 
from  the  common  traditions,  but  with  a  decided  preference  for  those  of  a 
typical  and  allegorical  nature.    The  very  first  effort  it  put  forth,  in  the  cathe- 
dral picture  of  the  patron  saint  of  Cologne  (1410),  seemed  like  a  new  crea- 
tion.   Tlic  masters  of  this  school  are  the  two  brothers  Van  Eyh  (about 
(1306-1470)  and  Albert  Diirer  (1471-1528),  each  devotedly  attached  to  sub- 
jects taken  from  sacred  history  and  from  nature.    They  all  excelled  in  the 
use  of  a  beautiful  indestructible  coloring,  and  labored  within  the  limits  of  a 
contracted  and  rather  beautiful  yet  appropriate  reality,  which  in  their  hands 
became  e.valtcd  as  the  type  of  the  celestial.     The  two  first  were  poetical  and 
graceful,  the  last  was  more  judicious,  fond  of  common  scenes,  but  fancifhl 
and  inexhaustible  not  only  in  his  power  of  invention,  but  in  his  diligence  in 
execution,  and  was  scientifically  acquainted  with  all  the  treasures  of  art  in 
the  Xetherlands  and  in  Italy,  (h)    The  simplicity  of  the  old  ecclesiastical  art 
was  still  i)reservcd  in  the  purest  form  in  Umhria^  by  means  of  the  spirit  and 
the  patronage  which  proceeded  from  Assisi,  although  its  rigid  sublimity  had 
become  somewhat  softened  and  tender.    Thus  Wiis  it  with  the  works  of  Pe- 
rufjhio  (1447-1524),  in  the  beautiful  sphere  to  which  he  confined  himself 
until  he  condescended  to  betray  his  art  for  money.    Thus  also  was  it  with 
res])oct  to  Franeiitco  Fraucia  (1450-1618),  who  in  spirit  belonged  to  this 
school,  and  correctly  delineated  the  ancient  forms,  while  he  gJive  to  them  the 
mo^t  delicate  blending  of  colors.    Thus  also  was  it  with  Raphael  (1483—1520), 
who  in  Umbria  combined  the  rigidness  of  ancient  Christianity  ^^rth  a  proper 
delicacy  of  feeling,  in  Florence  found  liberty  fully  to  f;ratify  his  ardent  love 
of  nature,  in  Rome  imparted  the  beauty  of  nature  to  Christian  ideals,  and  in 
his  own  bosom  found  a  correspondent  sublimity  of  conception  while  gazing 
upon  the  prophets  of  Angelo.    The  Madonnas  of  his  youth  are  full  of  sad- 
ness and  presentiment,  those  which  he  executed  in  Florence  of  simple  per- 
fect happiness,  and  those  of  the  Sistine  chapel  have  an  expression  appropriate 
to  the  virgin  queen  of  heaven.    The  Bible  in  the  hands  of  this  great  painter 
of  the  Church  became  a  series  of  pictures,  and  in  the  Stanzas  of  the  Vatican 
he  has  given  perpetuity  in  the  world  of  art  to  the  gorgeous  vision  even  then 
beginning  to  vanish,  according  to  which  the  papacy  was  the  central  point  of 
all  ecclesiastical  and  spiritual  life.  (/)    Even  his  other  purely  secular  produc- 
tions were  adjusted  to  the  same  exalted  position,  and  the  adventures  of  the 
Olympic  deities  were  conformed  to  the  spirit  of  the  age  of  the  papal  Medici, 
and  exhibited  all  the  embellishments  of  the  most  exuberant  fancy.    But  in 


h)  G.  F.  Waagen,  Uubert  u.  Joh.  v.  Kyck.  BrsL  1S22.  A.  WHatf,  A.  DQrer  u.  %,  ZelU.  I^ist- 
1919.  J.  lUlUr,  il  Lebtfn  n.  d.  Werke  A.  D.  rore.  Lps.  1S31.  Only  2  volaL  In  8  Ablh.  A  Stark,  A.- 
DQror.  (Oermania.  1S51.  p.  625tA) 

i)  G.  IhlloH  Descr.  dclle  ima^nc  diplnto  da  Kafaello  nolle  camera  del  Vatioano.  B<»n. 
[R.  Duppa,  Life  of  Raphael.  (Bogue's  Eur.  Lib.)  Lond.  1847.  8  ] 


CHAP.  II L    ECCLES.  LIFE.    $  26i  SAINTS.    CANOyiZATION.  307 

the  work  which  enlisted  his  last  and  dying  energies,  ho  appears  to  have 
canght  a  glimpse  of  Christ  in  his  future  glory.  (/) 

§  268.      Worship  of  the  Saints. 

The  confidence  reposed  in  the  goddess,  who,  either  as  a  bride  or  as  a 
mother,  was  supposed  to  have  all  power  in  heaven,  was  at  this  time  so  great 
that  the  dominion  of  the  world  seemed  to  have  been  regarded  as  a  vast  female 
fiof  (Kunkellehn),  and  it  was  no  longer  a  captions  jest  when  it  was  said  that 
the  virgin  queen  was  every  day  annoyed  with  all  kinds  of  importunities,  (d) 
In  Poetry  and  in  the  Imitative  Arts  she  was  represented  as  the  Christian 
counterpart  of  the  Siren  of  Venus,  and  of  Mother  Earth,  although  nature 
was  frequently  unconsciously  adored  in  her.    The  interest  felt  in  particular 
localities  for  those  relics  which  had  for  the  most  part  been  brought  home  by 
the  crusaders,  gave  occasion  for  a  continual  multiplicaftion  of  saintly  legends, 
embracing  many  newly  invented  adventures.    A  collection  of  these  was 
made  by  the  Dominican,  James  d^  Vorafjine  (d.  1298),  and  not  so  much  on 
acconnt  of  the  literary  contributions  of  the  author  as  of  the  popular  elements 
it  embraced,  and  the  summary  of  saints'  days  in  the  year  which  it  presented, 
itwas  used  in  all  parts  of  the  Western  Church  under  the  name  of  tlie  Golden 
Legend.  {?/)    Some  enlightened  teachers  indeed  feared  tliat  the  continually 
increasing  worship  of  saints  would  produce  a  forgetfulness  of  (Jod,  but  the 
Chnreh  not  oidy  inculcated  a  confidence  in  the  prayers  of  saints,  but  an  imi- 
tation of  their  virtues.    The  personal  relations  of  particular  patron  saints  to 
individual  families  and  guilds  which  had  the  care  of  tlieir  sacred  things,  gave 
occasion  to  various  rival  interests  in  their  behalf,  and  to  promote  their  re- 
spective glories  by  means  of  the  arts.    The  effect  of  this  was  sometimes 
liighly  favorable  to  an  increase  of  this  saintly  piety.    The  creation  of  new 
stints  was  dependent  upon  a  very  difficult  and  expensive  process  at  Home. 
In  some  cases  where  the  claims  for  a  canonization  were  not  made  out,  a  bea- 
tification was  provisionally  granted.   The  right  which  the  popes  had  reserved 
ttclosivoly  to  themselves  with  respect  to  these  matters,  Wiis  sometimes  exer- 
^b^d  by  tlie  great  councils.     The  halo  of  sanctity  was  a  mark  of  nobility, 
»nd  tljc  badge  of  an  order  which  encouraged  the  highest  services  by  a  reward 
in  the  humblest  form  for  the  present  life,  but  eternal  in  another.     The  mere 
pweasion  of  a  high  ecclesiastical  jjosition  was  not  ordinarily  enough  to  con- 
fer any  special  title  to  this  lionor.     Dut  even  tlie  saints  of  this  period  present 
no  very  exalted  specimens  of  genuine  human  excellence,  since  their  merit 
tt^^isUtcd  rather  in  strange  and  diversified  exhibitions  of  the  power  of  faith  in 
Wrurne  self-denials,  and  in  sacrifices.     The  influence  of  the  monastic  orders 
^Jis  sutlicient  to  obtain  the  canonization  of  a  few  monks,  whoso  scientiiic  iu- 
Te?tlgations  were  especially  characterized  by  the  ecclesiastical  spirit.    It  was 
Pfnerally  held  that  no  one  should  be  canonized  unless,  either  during  life  or  by 
"is'lcad  body  ho  had  wrought  some  miracles,  as  divine  announcements  of  his 


*>  /  D.  PiiMarant,  Eaf.  v.  Urbhio.  Lp^  1S39.  2  voK 
1)  Erwimfin,  PerogrinAtio  rdijrionls  ergo.  ArasL  1655.  p.  355s. 

*)  U»>n(laanreRa.  llL*t.  Loinbardlca.  Argent  1479.  t  4t  often,  ed.  Th.  Graeite^  Dresd.  et  Lps.  lS4Gaa. 
Traisfl«*«l  Into  all  tlio  Western  langunjfcs. 


I 


308  MKOIAEVAL  ClirilC'fl  IIISTOUV.    VKIL  IV.    A.  I).  1216-W17. 

sanctity.  Ki^ohtx  ron  der  FIii*\  on  the  Alps,  appears  as  an  in^;tance  of  a  pecu- 
liar class  of  saints,  similar  to  those  of  the  Thebais.  After  having  performed 
the  duties  of  a  husbandman,  a  father,  a  warrior,  and  a  jndjre  in  his  native 
land,  he  became  possessed  with  an  inteurse  longing  to  spend  his  life  with  God 
in  the  solitude  of  the  forest.  A  light,  like  a  sharp  knife  pierced  his  spirit, 
and  henceforth,  during  twenty  years  (1467-87),  he  lived  entirely  with  God, 
an<l  with  no  sustenance  except  what  he  obtained  from  his  communion  with 
God.  Ilis  humble  silence,  however,  could  not  save  him  from  the  suspicionfi, 
nor  the  pious  veneration  of  his  fellow-men.  In  consctjuence  of  the  former 
tlie  miracle  of  the  spirit  seemed  confirmed,  and  in  consequence  of  the  latter 
ho  became  the  counsellor  and  arbitrator  of  the  neighboring  shepherds.  When 
the  freedom  of  the  Swiss  confederacy  was  endangered  by  dissensions  among 
its  members  (1481),  harmony  was  restored  by  the  presence  and  authority  of 
Brother  Glaus,  (r)  Under  the  guidance  of  their  confessors  women  became 
saints.  In  Germany,  Elizaheth^  the  daughter  of  a  king,  and  full  of  grief  that 
she  could  not  die  a  virgin,  tliough  the  wife  of  a  prince,  sustained  herself  by 
the  profits  of  her  own  toil,  and  turned  the  Wartburg,  so  recently  the  abode 
of  worldly  pon-p  and  music,  into  a  hospital.  In  her  widowhood  she  solemnly 
renounced  her  own  will  and  all  the  world,  that  she  might  devote  herself  to 
the  care  of  leprous  persons,  and  dic<l  (12.'J1)  while  young,  beautiful,  and  glow- 
ing with  a  saintly  love.  The  stern  priest,  under  whose  perverted  counsels  she 
thus  fell  a  sacrifice,  delighted  in  the  hoi)o  that  all  renmanta  of  earthly  feeling 
had  been  slain  within  her  spirit,  and  iinnounced  at  Rome,  with  many  sworn 
witnesses,  her  ardent  piety,  the  radiance  of  her  countenance  in  prayer,  and 
the  miraculous  cures  which  she  had  etfected.  Her  apotheosis,  as  of  an  ideal 
of  charity,  was  celebrated  as  early  as  in  the  year  1236,  a  lofty  monument  of 
German  architecture  spans  her  grave  at  Marburg,  {d)  and  in  the  legend  the  saint 
has  obtained  so  much  grace,  that  even  her  timid  prevarication  mirnculoosly 
became  a  truth.  In  Italy  we  find  Catharine  of  Siena^  the  daughter  of  a 
dyer,  who  grew  up  among  the  sacred  services  of  the  Dominicans.  When  a 
child  she  was  accustomed  to  kiss  the  very  footsteps  of  these  pions  men.  She 
could  never  be  satisfied  with  self-denials  and  tortures,  and  at  a  later  ])eriod 
indulged  in  the  use  of  no  nutriment  but  that  which  she  derived  from  the  ele- 
ments of  the  Lord's  Supper.  Jesus  Christ  himself  condescended  to  pay  the 
child  a  friendly  visit,  wearing  his  triple  crown,  and  gradually  either  alone  or 
in  the  company  of  a  few  saints  his  visits  and  conversations  became  more  fre- 
quent, until  they  became  daily  occurrences.  Finally  he  solemnly  betrothed 
the  virgin  to  himself,  by  conferring  upon  her  a  ring,  and  took  from  her  sidfr 
her  heart,  and  substituted  his  own.     Such  at  least  was  the  statement  which 


c)  Widtner^  du  GOttl.  in  !rd.  Entwickl  nach^wiesen  im  Leben  Nik.  v.  d.  Fl.  Lur.  1819.  Bu^ 
«inffer,  Bruder  Klaus  u.  s.  Zoitalt  Liizcm.  1827.  {G.  Gdrres)  Oott  in  d.  Gesch.  Mnnich.  1881.  IL  1  . 
A  book  imputed  to  him  on  voluntary  seclusion  (Pliilo5.  mystico.  Nooet  ICIS.  4.)  is  not  genuine. 

<f)  I.  Conradi  Marpurg.  Klis.  vi<Ina.  Ep.  Exiiriitnatnrum  niiracc  ad.  Dum.  Papam.  (iLuehsnbechfr^'m 
Annal  Uasa.  Marp.  1735.  Collect  IX.)     TfMxloricu«  Thuring.  (of  Apold."»)  de  8,  Elisab.  ((7ttniji»» 

LectL  ed.  Basn.  Th.  IV.)    Greg.  IX.  Canonizatio  S.  Klls.  viduae.  (Bullar.  Rom.  Th.  L  p.  IM. ' 

IL  K.  W.  JusU :  Ell*,  d.  Hell.  Zur.  17D7.  MonUiUmhei-t,  Hist  dc  8.  Ells,  de  Honprte^  Par.  (ISSft-") 
1S87.  2  Th.  miL  Anm.  v.  Stadler,  Aach.  IS^C.  {€.  King$Uy,  The  True  Story  of  EUubetb  of  Hux^' 
gary«  or  the  Saint's  Tragedy.  Lend.  1852. 12.] 


CHAP.  IIL    ECCLES.  LIFR    $  268.  CATHARINE  OF  SIENA.  309 

8he  made  to  her  father  confessor.     It  is  possible  that  tho  interest  of  the  order 
may  hare  had  some  influence  in  the  result,  but  it  is  certain  that  this  lowly 
maid  was  finally  adored,  not  only  by  this  powerful  order,  but  by  nearly  tho 
whole  of  Italy.     Compelled  to  spend  much  of  her  time  in  the  midst  of  secu- 
lar employments  she  frequently  fell  into  a  trance.     She  was  finally  induced 
to  abandon  the  luxury  of  this  contemplative  kind  of  life,  and  of  her  attend- 
ance upon  couches  of  loathsome  disease,  that  she  might  devote  herself  to  tho 
work  of  composing  the  strifes  which  then  existed  in  Italy  and  in  the  Church. 
She  eihorted  Gregory  XL  to  enter  upon  another  crusade,  effected  i)eaco  be- 
trveen  him  and  the  Florentine^  urged  the  return  of  the  papacy  to  Rome,  wa; 
used  as  an  instrument  in  the  quarrels  of  the  mendicant  friars,  and  finally  died 
at  Rome  (1380)  the  saint  of  the  Roman  papacy  in  its  dissensions,  and  pas- 
sionately longing  to  meet  her  espoused  Lord.    In  consequence  of  the  un- 
friendly feelings  of  the  Franciscans  with  respect  to  her,  she  was  not  canonized 
until  a  long  period  after  her  death,  and  even  then  this  office  had  to  be  i)er- 
fomjed  (1461)  by  her  own  fellow-citizen,  Pius  II.  (t;)    The  only  saint  France 
could  claim  during  this  period,  since  she  oidy  effected  tho  deliverance  of  her 
country,  and  met  with  a  tragical  end,  was  never  recognized  by  her  age,  but 
WIS  burned  as  a  witch  (May  30,  1431  j.  (/) 

§  2G9.     Miracles  and  Magic, 

?^f>c//i,  de  suporslit  mi'dii  aevL  (0pp.  Ilasun.  vol.  IV.)  Meinertt^  Aborsrl.  dor  schol.  Jaiirh. 
tHi<  Vcrjlelcb.  d.  Sittoii  des  .MA.  vol.  III.)  [  W,tltfir  Sfott,  Denionology  &  Witchcraft  Lon'l.  1^3i». 
Xew  T.ek,  1S.31.  O.  C.  Ifnmf,  ZanWr  Rlbllotl^k,  Ac.  Mainz.  ISJC.  6  vok  8.  For.  Quart.  Hev.  (in 
UWAW  MiHouin.)  IWJO.  E.  S»tltet-t*!,  IHst  of  Mapic,  kc,  trans).  \>y  A.  T.  Vunnjmnu,  Lon<l.  Ib41. 
Sfw  York.  1S17.  2  vuU.  li     IT  6^  Dendy,  Phil,  of  Mystery.  New  York.  1645.  12.] 

The  intelligence  of  this  age  sometimes  imposed  limits  upon  the  enthu- 
siasm  which  delighted  only  in  supernatural  revelations,  and  assumed  higher 
ground  than  the  popular  faith,  since  it  occasionally  tore  the  mask  from  de- 
ception, or  proposed  to  the  legend  some  questions  with  regard  to  its  veracity. 
Bloody  Hosts  were  not  generally  regarded  as  miracles,  tliough  none  could 
tben  explain  them  on  scientific  i)rinciples.  And  yet  Birgitta's  revelations 
were  solemnly  confirmed  {a)  at  Constance  and  at  Basle,  and  the  people  cried 
out  ''  A  miracle !"  when  the  mendicant  friar  saw  the  blood  of  Christ  flow 
<iown  the  crucifix  erected  for  absolution,  {h)  Numerous  pilgrims  and  beggars, 
>8  well  as  immense  wealth  and  treasures  of  art  were  collected  at  Loretto,  on 
account  of  the  legend  of  the  fourteenth  century,  respecting  the  house  of  the 
dirine  Virgin,  which,  having  been  consecrated  as  a  temple  by  the  apostles, 
^been  removed  by  angels  from  Nazareth,  after  the  loss  of  the  Holy  Land, 


<)  Ada  P3.  April,  vol.  HI.  p.  &5.'}»<Ji.  Her  Ix'ttom,  conversations,  and  revelations  are  e<lltc<l  in 
I»»li«n,  by  (Uglt^  Slen.  ITOTsi*.  5  Th.  4  coiiip.  Fobrii-.  I5U.1.  med.  et  inf.  LaL  Th.  I.  p.  SiJ-ls.  Pn.Oi  •»- 
»a*cont«sutionnm  miwr  sanctitatc  tt  d«»clr.  B.  Culli.  OfarUn^,  aiiipl.  Col.  Th.  VI.  p.  12«7.s*.) 

/)  Pruoi'sde  condamnation  et  de  rehabilitation  do  rloanne  d'Arc  dite  la  PucoUo.  8ui\i>  do  tons  k- 
**«nv*ni«  hist  par  Jnhn  Quich^rat,  Par.  1S41-9.  T)  v«.N.— A'.  Hunt,  d.  Jiuijrf.  d.  Orl.  (N'oiu-  Prophv- 
*"■  Lf*.  1^5l.)  [J.  M.  KntfiH,  Story  of  Joan  of  Arc.  Phllad.  1S3!».  Aiwiu  Memoirs  of  Jean  dA.  it 
^  0^  ber  Um«t  LomL  1S24.  2  vols.  12  ] 

Q)  (r^rNOfr,  Fr.  de  pmhatitme  spiritiiuiii.  KM'F-  ^<>'-  '•  '*•  ^-  P-  3")  Tr.:  do  distitiotiono  vorar. 
^wnmaCilAU  {lb.  p.  -W.)    Ilmft,  Const  Cone.  vol.  III.  I».  III.  p.  23j«.  voL  IV.  P.  XL  p.  i^Os. 

h  According  to  George  of  Aniialt,  Losch^r,  Kef.  Actrt,  vol.  I.  p.  SsS. 


310  MEDIAEVAL  CHURCH  UISTOET.  PER.  IV.    A.  D.  1216-161T. 

and  after  many  wanderings  had  fonnd  a  permanent  abode  at  Loretto  (1205).  {c) 
Mysterious  arts  to  ascertain  the  future  had  never  been  entirely  discontinued. 
Astrology  had  been  raised  by  the  influence  of  the  Saracens  to  the  dignity  erf 
a  science,  and  sometimes  had  an  officer  at  court  appointed  to  attend  to  its 
interests.  White  magic  was  tolerated  by  the  Church.  But  the  unfriendly 
spirit  shown  by  the  advancing  intelligence  of  the  age  toward  superstition, 
harmonized  with  the  suspicion  of  the  vulgar  that  the  ordinary  limits  of  hu- 
manity cim  seldom  be  i)assed  without  Satanic  art.  The  same  spdls  which 
the  Church  used  for  the  deliverance  and  exaltation  of  souls  were  supposed 
to  bo  employed  by  the  infernal  powers  in  like  manner,  for  their  destruction. 
The  horror  felt  in  the  depths  of  our  own  nature  for  such  arts  has  been  gen- 
erally expressed  in  the  arbitrary  symbols  vrhich  superstition  has  invented. 
Yet  in  the  Italian  legend  of  the  enchanter,  Virgil^  we  have  not  cnly  the 
unconscious  prophet  of  Christianity  who  was  lamented  by  Puul,  but  the  skil- 
ful employment  of  the  black  art  in  the  performance  of  wonderful  feats,  and 
in  the  construction  of  buildings.  In  the  Norman  Merlin  also,  is  set  forth  a 
sliadowy  counterpart  of  the  divine  Saviour,  when  the  wild  impulses  he  derived 
from  his  demoniac  origin  are  contrasted  with  the  graceful  humanity  he  in- 
herited from  his  mother.  In  the  German  story  of  Faust,  the  representative 
and  compiler  of  all  the  magic  of  the  Middle  Ages,  and  in  that  of  his  younger 
brother  of  a  more  southern  clime,  Ban  Juan,  is  exhibited  the  ruin  of  the 
must  richly  endowed  genius,  when  it  is  determined  by  the  aid  of  infernal 
powers  to  exceed  the  limits  God  has  assigned  to  human  knowledge  and  enjoy- 
ment, (d)  The  truth  of  this  popular  faith  in  covenants  and  unlawful  inter- 
course with  the  devil  wtis  finally  conceded  by  the  Church,  and  those  who 
were  supposed  to  be  guilty  of  such  things  were  arraigned  before  the  eccle- 
siii^tical  tribunals  as  traitors  against  divine  majesty.  (<•)  Sometimes  those  who 
addicted  themselves  to  the  black  art  were  bunied  by  the  direction  of  the 
Church,  but  frequently  the  imputation  of  sorcery  was  derided  as  a  mere  su- 
perstition. On  hearing  that  witches  and  wizards  practised  their  arts  in  Ger- 
many to  the  serious  injury  of  both  property  and  life  among  the  people. 
Innocent  VJII.  revived  (1484)  the  laws  agjiinst  magic  in  the  widest  sense 
inii)lied  in  the  popular  faitli,  (/)  and  appointed  two  judges  of  witches  for 
Upper  Germany,  who  compiled  a  manual  for  the  trial  of  witches,  as  remark- 
able for  its  learning  as  for  its  superstition  and  impurity.  (//)  Then  conmienced 
a  process,  during  which  the  popular  faith,  avarice,  and  the  new  modes  of  evi- 
dence required  by  the  penal  law,  consigned  thousands  of  witches  to  the 
flames.  The  injuries  which  they  were  accused  of  inflicting  were  generally 
confined  to  the  most  trifling  matters  of  ordinary  life,  and  no  witch  appears 


c)  BapthUi  MantttanuM,  Eco,  Laurctanae  Hist  (0pp.  Antn.  1576.  toJ.  IV.  p^  216»!s.)  MarUmelli 
Toatro  istor.  della  8.  Casa  Naz.  Kom.  1732.  2  vols.  Treated  polemically :  Vergerii  I*  do  Idolo  Ijiur. 
(0|)p.  adv.  Papatnm.  Tub.  1563.  4.  Th.  I.)  Ingol  15S1.  Bemeggfr^  Hypobollmaca  Marlae  d^Iparae 
camera.  Argent  1619.  4.  Af>ologetica1iy :  Turriani  Kesp.  ad  capita  ai^m.  VergerH  haercUei.  Ingol. 
l."^S4.  4.     Turselini  LaureUna  lllst  Mog.  1599.  Ven.  1T27. 

(f)  J.  Gorre^,  die  dents^hcn  Volksbucber.  ITcidcIb.  1S07.  p.  207sa.  C.  L,  StUglUzy  Sage  r.  RamL 
{liauinpr,  lliftt  Taschend.  I.i)z.  1834)  Coinp.  Jabrb.  t  wLsa.  Krltlk,  1SS4  N.  25.  [W.  Gw/ttin,  Lixtc 
<»r  tbe  Necromancers,  New  Y(>rk.  1885. 12.]       e)  According  to  Oen.  6.  1-4.    Eiewf.  22,  191 

/)  Jlauher,  BIbllotheca.  SL  I.  p.  Isa. 

g)  {Jitc.  Sprenger  et  lleinr.  Intttiior.)    Malleus  Malcficarom.  Col.  14S9.  4.  A  «lt«n. 


CHAP.  IIL    ECCLE8.  LIFE.    pfi$9.  WITCnCRAFT.    §  270.  DISCIPLINE.  3 1 1 

6ver  to  have  become  wealthy  by  her  arts.  Actual  crimes  were  never  legally 
proved.  Some  may  have  been  induced  by  the  popular  superstition,  by  som- 
nambulistic states,  and  by  narcotic  salves,  to  form  criminal  desires,  and  to 
regard  themselves  as  witches.  But  in  general  the  violence  of  tortures,  and 
the  various  illegal  processes  of  investigation  were  sufficient  to  account  for  the 
confession  of  unnatural  crimes,  without  supposing  them  real,  {h)  But  no 
persons  ventured  to  express  doubts  with  respect  to  the  propriety  of  such  pro- 
ceedings, except  on  very  rare  occasions,  and  in  the  most  guarded  manner.  (/) 
The  picture  drawn  of  the  Witch's  Sabbath  is  only  a  copy  of  the  fantastic 
representations  often  given  of  the  assemblies  of  heretics.  The  process  against 
witches  now  supplied  the  place  of  that  which  had  formerly  been  employed 
against  heretics.  It  was  only  in  Germany,  England,  and  Scandinavia,  that 
the  nation  generally  became  enlisted  in  its  behalf.  The  bulls  of  Alexander 
ind  Leo  against  magicians  and  poisoners  in  Lombardy,  appear  to  liave  been 
directed  against  some  remnants  of  the  Manichaeans.  (k)  As  all  nature  was 
believed  to  be  subservient  to  the  kingdom  of  God,  and  to  have  a  share  in  the 
blessings  of  the  Church,  many  thought  proper  sometimes  to  defend  themselves 
cren  against  noxious  beasts  by  exorcism  and  excommunication.  (/) 

§  270.     Church  DmipUne  and  Induhjencen.     Cont.from  §§  66,  202. 

The  Ban  and  the  Interdict  had  now  lost  their  power,  in  consequence  of 
the  abase  which  had  been  made  of  them.    The  popes  were  therefore  com- 
pelled in  their  political  contests  to  sharpen  their  spiritual  weapons,  by  abol- 
ishing every  right  previously  recognized  among  enlightened  and  Chri?;tian 
nations.    Clement  V.  and  Sixtus  IV.  declared  the  Venetians  infamous  and 
ontlawe<l,  even  to  the  fourth  generation,  {ft)    In  the  thirteenth  century  the 
popes  introduced  the  annual  practice  on  the  day  before  Good  Friday  (incoena 
Domini),   when    absolution  was  especially  ])estowed    before   the   altar,  of 
solemnly  pronouncing  sentence  of  excommunication,  in  a  form  not  then  invn- 
rinble,  against  the  whole  host  of  heretics  and  wicked  persons  of  all  kiu'ls, 
then  80  constantly  increasing.  (Jb)     The  discipline  of  the  Church  had  become 
exceedingly  lax,  in  consequence  of  the  vast  number  of  the  mendicant  friars, 
and  the  preachers  of  indulgences.     The  prerogative  ])y  wliich  the  popes  j)ro- 
fessed  to  remit  all  ecclesiastical  punislnnents  became  so  much  extended  that 
they  finally  possessed  the  complete  power  to  forgive  all  sins.     Tliis  was  de- 
rived  from  the  doctrine  which  taught  that  the  merits  of  Christ  and  the  saints 
(Thesaurus  supererogation  is  perfectorum)  were  so  abundant,  and  the  unity 


A)  X.  Rfmigii  DacinoDolatrio.  Lutril.  159.").  4.  Frkf.  IbOs.—l/.tubfr,  IJihliotlieca,  acta  et  Pcripta 
"•«Jea.  Lemgo.  1789s8.  36  St  W.  G.  S'>ldan,  Gt-scli.  <1.  nexi*npr.)cv»<i'.  Slutt^'.  1S48.  C.  G.  r.  Wmh- 
'"^  In  ?.  B«rltr.  z  deatsclien  Oesoh.  Insb.  z.  Gcsch.  <L  Strnfr.  p.  bl.  *i77!<!».  Comp.  Grimin^  <loiit*chc 
MjtlHj.  p.  579SS. 

')  C/r.  Jfoiitor,  Ac  Lanilla  et  i)ytlionlcl.s  mnllerlb.  CoL  14s9.  Strasb.  1575.  4.  J.  «'<>/•,  dc  prae.«ll- 
8a*d«monain.  Ba^  1563,  &  often. 

*)  //a«tA#r,  St.  III.  p.  15U^.  St.  V.  277{w. 
^  h  Ilfrnmerlin^  Tr.  de  exorc.  et  wljiiratlonib.  c.  anlnialln  brnta  (about  1451).—^  Prir^  lCap]iort  oi 
'*c*i«rches  8ur  le^  procojs  et  juflri-m.  rt'Iatlfj*  aux  aniinaiix.  l*ar.  lS'il». 

«)  litiynaltj^  tul  ann.  13o9.  N.  6.  a<l  aiiD.  1*52.  N.  18ss.  Cotnp.  Muratori  vol.  VIII.  p.  1151. 

^)  lAmUrtini  Ac  Fe6tl«.  P.  L  c  IIHJ.  Raynald.  ad.  aim.  1411.  N.  1.  {Le  Bret)  Gesch.  d.  Balle 
J»noeiial>omjni  (Stattg.)  17698.  4  vols.  4. 


312  MKDiAKVAT.  t  iin:c:i  ni<n!:v.   ri:ii.  iv.   a.  d.  1216-151T. 

of  the  mystical  body  of  the  Chnroh  was  so  perfect,  that  she  had  power  to 
dispose  of  those  merits  according  to  tlie  wants  of  men.  (c)  Even  the  indul- 
gences of  the  year  of  Jnbilee  were  sent  beyond  the  Alps,  and  when  divinee 
were  debating  whether  the  pope  had  power  of  absolving  souls  in  purgatory, 
the  bnlLs  of  indulgence  issued  by  Alexander  and  Leo  soon  decided  the  ques- 
tion, (ff)  Ever  since  the  papal  chair  had  sustained  some  severe  shocks,  the 
popes  had  opened  such  a  shameless  trade  in  indulgencen^  that  those  who 
farmed  and  dispensed  them  paid  little  attention  to  the  repentance  and  reforma- 
tion which  had  always  been  demanded  by  the  Church  as  conditi<^ns  of  for- 
giveness. The  indulgence  was  disposed  of  as  all  that  was  needful  for  recon- 
ciliation with  God,  even  for  yet  future  and  intended  offences.  Grave 
ecclesiastical  letters  on  the  unlawful  use  of  butter  were  harmless.  Some 
indulgences  wore  granted  to  obtain  funds  for  the  erection  of  inland  churches, 
hospitals,  and  even  secular  establishments  of  general  utility,  A  largo  portion 
of  the  revenue  was  consumed  by  the  preachers  themselves,  but  the  final 
receptacle  was  the  treasurer  of  the  pope.  Just  as  the  profits  of  all  money  for 
indulgences  had  been  formerly  devoted  to  the  crusades,  they  were  now^  ap- 
propriated to  the  Turkish  war  or  to  the  erection  of  St.  Peter's  church.  A 
general  rumor,  however,  prevailed,  that  Leo  X.  had  promised  a  part  of  the 
money  so  basely  obtained  from  Germany,  to  his  sister,  {e)  It  was  in  vain 
tliat  the  people  remonstrated  against  these  extortions  and  immoralities,  and 
some  of  the  princes  either  forbade  the  preachers  of  indulgences  to  enter  their 
dominions,  or  deprived  them  of  the  revenues  they  had  collected.  Literary 
niou  directed  the  shafts  of  their  ridicule  against  these  hawkers,  and  even 
expressed  some  doubts  whether  the  tickets  they  bestowed  would  be  respected 
by  the  great  Judge  of  all.  The  more  earnest  class  of  preachers  were  also 
indignant  and  zealous  against  a  trade  which  involved  the  murder  of  the  souls 
of  men.  (/) 

§  271.    Flagellants  and  Dancers, 

(Jitc  Boil^au)  lllst  Flaj;ellantium.  Par.  ITOO.  12.  Schtxttffen,  do  secln  Flag.  Lps.  1711.  fdrm- 
^mann^  dJo  chr.  Golwilergosellscliafton.  Ilal.  182S.  Mohnike,  u.  Oeisslergesellsch.  u.  verbrud,  (Ueaer 
Art  (Zcitachr.  f.  hist  Th.  1S33.  vol.  III.  St.  I.y—Uecker  dio  Tanrwoth.  BrL  1S82. 

A  system  of  penance  and  fleshly  mortification  by  scourging  (disciplina)  in 
the  closet,  was  especially  recommended  by  Damiani,  and  extensively  encour- 
aged by  the  mendicant  orders.  But  all  at  once  appeared  long  processions  of 
penitents,  who  went  about  day  and  night,  naked  down  to  the  waist,  with 
heads  covered,  sinpring  penitential  psalms,  and  whipping  themselves  until  the 
blood  flowed.  This  peculiar  mode  of  contrition  commenced  in  Perugia 
(12G0),  and  soon  spread  over  nearly  all  Italy.    In  the  struggle  between  the 


c)  Alex.  IfiiUn,  Snmma,  P.  IV.  Qu.  23.  Art  Ir. 

d)  AIm.  HnUtt,  P.  IV.  Qa.  28.  Art  2.  T/ionuu,  Suppl.  ad  Sunim.  P.  II L  Qa.  71.  Art  10.  7W- 
ihtin.  Ghron.  lliraaufr.  vol.  II.  p.  HS^i.—Amoi't.  1.  c  vol.  1.  p.  96.  209.  vol.  II.  p.  2S8. 

e)  M.  VUlnni  VI,  14     Guicciardini  1.  XIII.  p.  896. 

/)  Appollatlo  pn)  parte  princo.  Norlmb.  a.  1460.  inlerposita.  {S^nckenherg,  SoL  jur.  et  htat  Fref. 
178i  vol.  IV.  p.  37S.)  Wfs«eU  adv.  indulgentlas  Dsp.  (  Wahh,  Mon.  vaeAW  aeri,  voL  I.  p.  111.)  Ar- 
thold^  edit,  by  Kling,  p.  884.  Loscher,  Ret  A^t^  vol  I.  p.  SAftss.  Kapp,  Saninil.  etnlger  z.  AU. 
gchor.  Schriften,  Lps.  1721.  Veesenmeyer^i.  Gesch.  d.  Ablasswes.  kura.  vor.  d.  Rc£  (KUut  Arohlv. 
1825.  vol.  III.  St  4.) 


CHAP.  IIL    EGCLES.  LIFR    S  271.  FLAGELLANTS.    DANCERS.  313 

Gaelphs  and  the  Ghibollines  this  country  had  boon  more  tlian  ordinarily  filled 
with  vices  and  crimes,  and  the  people  now  seemed  to  linve  been  siezed  by  a 
penitential  paroxysm,  and  to  celebrate  a  general  sea«'on  of  reconcili.ition  with 
God.  {a)    A  few  of  these  processions  crossed  tlie  Alps,  jmd  were  there  rather 
objects  of  astonishment  than  of  imitation.     But  when  the  hiarj'  death  came 
from  Asia  and  passed  through  Europe  (1348),  even  in  Germany  every  place 
was  startled  by  the  scourging  processions  of  the  brethren  of  the  cross,  whoso 
doleful  songs  were  especially  directed  to  Christ,  entreating  him  by  the  recol- 
lection of  his  own  sufferings,  and  from  a  regard  to  their  repentance,  to  stay 
the  progress  of  the  plague,  (b)    These  scenes  were  repeated  as  often  as  the 
people  were  visited  by  national  calamities,  or  there  appeared  to  be  a  call  for 
an  unusual  degree  of  penitence.    A  number  of  these  scourging  procession'* 
passed  through  Southern  Europe,  near  the  commencement  of  the  fifteenth 
century,  under  the  direction  of  the  Dominican,  Vincent  im  Ferrer  I,  a  Span- 
iard, whose  eloquence  was  so  powerful  among  different  nations,  in  exciting 
men  to  a  religious  earnestness,  that  the  gil^  of  tongues  seemed  to  have  been 
restored  in  him.  (c)  At  fii-st  the  popes  were  in  favor  of  this  movement,  because 
tbey  hoped  it  might  stimulate  the  energy  of  the  ecclesiastical  party  against 
the  Ghibellincs.     But  when  the  scourge  began  to  be  looked  upon  as  more 
efficacious  than  all  ecclasiastical  penances  and  means  of  grace,  the  hierarchy 
hecame  displeased  with  it.     Clement  VI.  declared  himself  opi)osed  to  an 
enthusiasm  (1349)  which  threatened  the  subversion  of  all  ecclesiastical  and 
civil  order,  (d)  and  finally  Vincentius  himself  yielded  obedience  to  the  dissua- 
rive  admonition  of  the  Council  of  Constance,  (c)  This  unfriendly  disj)osition  of 
the  Church  induced  some  societies  of  Flagellants  to  assume  a  hostile  position 
toward  the  ecclesiastical  authorities.   In  Thuringia  a  company  of  theni  which 
bad  been  condemned  to  the  flames  by  the  inquisition  (after  1414),  denounced 
the  clerg}'  as  Antichrist,  rejected  the  use  of  the  crucifix  and  of  images,  and 
the  invocation  of  saints  in  worship,  and  substituted  the  baptism  of  blood  by 
the  scourge  for  all  ecclesiastical  sacraments.  (/)     The  same  kind  of  sensuous 
deTotion  by  means  of  convulsions  of  pain  or  pleasure,  was  practised  by  bands 
of  Dancen  in  a  few  towns  along  the  Rhine  (1374,  1418).     This  epidemic  was 
treated  in  Stra.sburg  as  a  demoniacal  possession,  against  which,  invocations 
were  made  to  St.  Vitus,  (g) 


«)  JTwKirW  PaPirini  Chnm.  (.Vunitorl  vol.  VIII.  p.  71 'Ja.) 

t)  Aflor  a<*ner*»  CMironIk:  C.  Scfimidt,  Llod  u.  Predict  d.  GclsM.  (Stud.  u.  Krlt.  ISGT.  n.  4.) 
^  S^^tgan^,  lo  grnntl  ptf-IerinAgc  d<«  flauolIjinL-*.  Strash.  1S37.  Frooly  revlse<l  by  TinvMnUorf,  Lps. 
^^l-IIfck^r,  d.  whwarze  Tod.  im  14.  Jahrh.  llrl.  1832. 

f)  lutltcig  IhU^r^  Vine,  Ferr.  nach  .s.  Leben  o.  Wirkem.  Brl.  1S:30.  Come»  t/c  If<>fieuthaf'Stae(i- 
W^«le  Vine.  Fvrr.  Li>!>.  IS  19.  4. 

<f)  Tritht.nti  Chron.  Hire.  II.  \\.  2()9.    liaynahl.  ad  ann.  1349.  N.  20. 

')  Gtrtum^  Ep.  m1  Vine  (C)pp.  vcd  II.  p.  658.)  Tr.  contra  st^ctarn  flapell.  50.  (Th.  p.  66(».) 

/)  llardt.  Const,  Cone  vol.  I.  p.  126.  Coiiip.  R.  Stump/,  Ili.Ht.  fl.'urtdl.  praeolpuo  in  Tliurlngia.  ITSO. 
"^•♦••tftnnnw/i  Neue  Mltth.  a.  d.  Gebletc  bl.-»t.  antiq.  Fork;li.  vol.  II.  II,  1.) 

0)  JiuticM  of  Badulphas  de  Ulvo,  in  tbo  Lioipunrlan  and  Alsatian  Cbronielc  in  FOrstemaiin,  p. 
****  *  Hesker. 


314  MEDIAEVAL  CUUBCU  mSTOBT.    PEK.  IT.    A.  D.  1216-1517. 


§  272.    MordU  of  the  Clergy, 

Avignon  and  Kome  had  now  received  the  names  of  Sodom  and  Babjlon, 
and  it  was  reported  that  in  those  places  Christianity  was  of  no  other  benefit 
than  jis  a  profitable  fable.  ('/)  The  most  exalted  and  wealthy  stations  in  the 
Church  were  regarded  merely  as  livings  belonging  to  certain  persons  by  birth, 
or  civilly  to  bo  i)iirchased,  and  those  who  occupied  them  followed  the  esam- 
j)le  of  the  Roman  court,  by  devoting  themselves  wholly  to  worldly  interest. 
Public  services  were  for  the  most  part  administered  by  an  ignorant  and  low 
minded  rabble,  from  which  no  one  could  ever  expect  to  raise  himself  by  the 
most  meritorious  exertions  for  the  good  of  the  Church,  (b)  The  clergy  were 
also  corrupted  by  secret  lewdness,  for  the  practice  of  which  the  spiritual  office 
itself  was  made  subservient,  or  by  concubinage,  to  which  they  were  often 
urged  by  their  congregations  for  the  safety  of  the  people,  and  for  which  they 
were  taxed  by  their  bishops,  (c)  During  the  various  reformations  projected 
in  the  fifteenth  century,  it  was  sometimes  proposed  that  the  honor  of  the 
priesthood  should  be  redeemed  by  restoring  to  them  the  rights  of  nature. 
But  even  liberal-minded  prelates  acknowledged  that  such  a  measure  would  be 
the  commencement  of  a  revolution  in  all  hierarchical  relations,  {d)  Hence, 
while  the  most  unscrupulous  portion  of  the  clergy  compensated  themselves 
by  indulgence  in  base  and  scanty  pleasures,  those  who  were  serious-minded 
and  anxious  to  comply  with  the  requirements  of  the  Church,  and  by  good 
works  attain  a  seat  in  heaven,  were  borne  down  by  their  burden,  and  made 
uneasy  on  account  of  doubts  respecting  their  salvation.  The  sentiments  of 
the  people  with  reference  to  the  clergy  wavered  between  habitual  reverence 
and  an  involuntary  feeling  of  contempt  Sometimes,  however,  the  popular 
indignation  against  the  sins  and  privileges  of  the  clergy  broke  forth  into  open 
violence.  The  literary  portion  of  the  laity  put  into  circulation  heavy  accusa- 
tions and  bitter  satires  against  the  clergy,  (e)  Even  in  some  books  of  pictures 
were  represented  many  scenes  from  the  lives  of  the  prelates,  in  contrast  with 
others  taken  from  the  humble  lives  of  Christ  and  his  apostles.  But  in  this 
way  the  Christian  spirit  maintained  its  rights,  or  at  least  preserved,  in  the 
midst  of  the  Church  a  full  liberty  sternly  to  reprove  such  enormities ;  and 
there  were  not  wanting  even  in  the  great  councils,  some  preachers  of  repent- 
ance, who  held  up  a  faithful  mirror  in  which  the  Church  could  recognize  its 
own  distorted  features.  (/)  There  were  always  many  among  the  clergy  wor- 
thy ot  a  better  age,  who  felt  the  disgrace  of  their  times,  and  to  whom  it  was 


a)  Ptttrnrca,  Epp.  sine  tit  Lib.  (Lng«l.  1621.)  Ep.  10. 18.    ^^c  de  Cl^mariffi^  de  niln»  Ecc.  c  2T. 

b)  OrtffnniuH  coram  Urbino  V.  {Flacii  Cat  test  vcr.  N.  106.) 

c)  Cone.  Paltrntin.  a.  1322.  c  7.  {Mansi  Tli.  XXV.  p.  Toa)  Nic.  de  ClemangiK  c  22.— TVIiwr, 
erzw.  EhoUisijrk.  vol.  II.  p.  591s8. 

</)  GerHon.  Dial.  s)phiae  ct  naturae  super  caelib.  (0pp.  voL  11.  p.  617.)  More  sllghtlj:  Piua  II. 
{PUitlnn  p.  W5.> 

e)  Many  of  tliose  by  the  Troubadours  In  Diets,  (Zwick.  1S29.)  in  the  Fabliaux  et  contes  publ  par 
Mi*on  (Par.  ISi''^)  in  FUtcii  CatAl.  tcstium  veritatis,  Kpp.  viror.  ob»cun>ruin.  Pasqallli  (ElcatberopoL 
1544.)  &  others. 

/)  The  dbconrses  of  JJ^rnardus  RiptisaUi^  TheobaUlm  k  others  in  Hardt^  Ck>n8t.  Cona  Th.  I. 
P.  XVIII.  p.  879SS. 


CHAP.  IIL    ECCLES.  LIFE.    §  272.  CLERGY.    §  273.  PEOPLE.  315 

evident  that  so  conteniptiblo  a  hierarchy  could  no  lunger  control  the  hearts 
of  men.  (g) 

§  273.     Tlie  Religious  Character  of  tlie  People.     Cant,  from  §  200. 

The  gradual  transformation  which  had  taken  place  in  the  eliaractcr  of  the 
people  did  not  publicly  manifest  itself  until  hear  the  close  of  this  ])eriod. 
Superstition  was  not  yet  eradicated,  hut  the  enthusiasm  and  poetic  fervor  it 
had  displayed  in  former  times  had  gradually  disippeared,  and  the  exuheranoe 
of  fancy  which  had  been  enlisted  in  its  service  now  gave  way  before  the 
efforts  of  the  understanding.     Tliese  had  been  awakened  to  the  highest  inten- 
sity by  tlie  exigences  of  the  real  worM,  and  in  order  to  obtain  the  comforts 
of  life.     Not  only  had  the  morals  of  the  people  been  endangered  with  ro- 
8i>ect  to  individual  actions,  but  tlie  very  principles  on  which  tliey  were  founded 
h:ul  been  changed  by  the  free  sale  of  indulgences.     Still  the  Christian  spirit 
and  the  common  sense  of  the  i>eoplc  always  returned  again  to  the  great  ele- 
ments of  moral  truth.    Literature  and  science  then  reviving  in  groat  vigor, 
were  generally  clothed  in  a  learned  dress,  and  confined  to  the  Liitin  language. 
The  iHjople  were  not  prepared  to  enjoy  the  benefit  of  the  n^w  art  of  print- 
ing until  they  had  learned  to  read.     While  the  lower  clergy  reniained  so 
ignorant,  it  was  needless  to  employ  any  special  art  to  retain  the  peoi)le  in  that 
state  of  ])U[)ilago  without  which  no  hierarchy  will   be  tolerated,  and  yet  we 
find  some  institutions  like  the  censorship  of  the  press,  the  impiisition,  and  the 
limitations  imposed  upon  the  use  of  translations  of  the  Bible,  which  clearly 
evince  an  intention  of  keeping  the  peoj)le  in  a  degraded  condition.     The 
proofs,  however,  which  we  possess,  that  the  people  were  generally  ignorant 
and  corrupt,  {a)  refer  principally  to  Northern  Germany,  and  to  the  lowest 
da«fics.  The  best  domestic  chaplains  were  the  mothers,  (h)  and  knowledge,  not 
riijcerity  or  strong  religious  feeling,  wjis  wanting.     It  was  night,  but  in  many 
reAi>ects  a  .^cred  night.    Knighthood,  and  consequently  the  true  basis  of  an 
aristocracy,  had  been  undermined  by  the  use  of  gunpowder,  the  leg  .1  consti- 
tutions of  the  several  states,  and  the  new  power  of  the  commercial  classes. 
Even  the  poetry  of  cliivalry  had  been  exchanged  in  the  schools  which  the 
Master-singers  who  lived  near  the  close  of  the  thirteenth  century  held  in 
the  different  cities,  for  lays  which  related  more  to  the  ordinary  lives  of  the 
middle  and  hiboring  classes.     The  popular  elements  contained  in  the  ancient 
poetry  were  made  more  prominent,  and  modern  improvcinents  were  added  to 
them  as  in  the  Low-German  fable  of  Keynard  ilv-}.  Fox.     During  the  strug- 
0e  then  in  progress  between  the  Church  and  the  State,  a  third  osteite  had 
^n  gradually  formed  by  the  side  of  the  nobility  and  the  clergy,  which  had 

H)  Aft«r  Gfr»<m,  Thewl  a.  ^iom,  and  especially  Ific.  de  ClenuingiK,  do  rulna  Eccl.  {llardf^ 
^n*t(\,nc  vol.  LP.  IIL) 

01  Collected  In  the  tirst  chapter*  of  the  Histories  of  the  liefonnalion.  e.  g.  KL  Vfj^Ui  IIi-.t  ct 
»»>!»iu,<  reform,  ov.  riiii.  1G>S.  Lbucher,  llof.  Acta,  vol.  I.  p.  IOOsh.  Spi^ker,  Liither,  vol.  I.  p.  «7ss. 
«!».  Brftgrhiuidi:r,  Lothcrs  Schilder.  d.  sittl.  Venl.  I)etit5chl.  (Kef.  Alman.  IS17.  p.  212w.;  [Ills- 
tolts  by  lianke  (iransl.  by  Mrs.  Austin),  natliliufftnv,  Siehbing^  Soarn^v^  Scilt^  D'AiAifln*  and 
®**'«^"j  On  the  other  Mdo  Bctr.  u.  d.  Zn?t  d.  K,  im  15.  u.  Ant  16.  Jaiirii  In  Bi^njj.  a.  d.  Nothw. 
*«»«'l.  Orun.ll.  d.  K.  verletzenden  livt  (Tub.  Quartahchr.  1S3L  P.  4.) 

^)  Predijtten  d.  Fuwten  Qeorg  v.  AnhaJt  Witt.  15M.  p.  289. 


316  MEDIAEVAL  CHURCH  niSTOBY.    PEK.  IV.    A.  D.  1116-1011. 

become  acquainted  with  the  pleasures  of  mental  freedom  and  of  civilization. 
In  Italy,  espetially,  where  the  doctrines  of  the  Ghibelline  party  were  com- 
mon, where  ehussical  studies  were  cultivated,  and  the  papacy  was  seen  in  its 
corruptions  at  home,  this  class  became  indifferent  to  the  Church,  and  some- 
times to  Christianity  itself,  though  it  condescended  to  allow  the  popular  re- 
ligion to  remain  unmolested,  (f*)  In  Germany,  especially,  a  healthy  energy 
still  remained,  and  many  had  tasted  of  intellectual  freedom  in  consequence  of 
tlie  nmnicipal  liberties  they  had  acquired.  Such  were  therefore  prepared  to 
repel  every  unlawful  aggression  which  might  be  made  upon  them  in  civil  or 
ecclesiastical  affairs. 

§  274.     Sarcey  of  the  Monastic  Life.     Cont,  from  §  266. 

Tlie  more  ancient  orders  lived  in  retirement,  some  of  them  strictly  observ- 
ing their  original  severity  of  discipline,  but  most  of  tliom  in  the  enjoyment 
of  great  wealth.  Frequently  scarcely  a  semblance  of  their  original  rule  re- 
mained, and  sometimes  vows  were  made  by  the  members  that  they  would  not 
regard  it.  The  convents,  in  some  instances,  became  phices  of  the  most  shame- 
less lewdness,  and  tlie  most  unnatural  crimes  were  concealed  within  their 
wolh«.  Various  attempts  at  reform  were  therefore  made  during  the  fifteenth 
century,  especially  at  Constance  and  Ba«le,  and  were  partially  carried  to  a 
successful  issue  by  the  right  or  wrong  means  used  by  the  ecclesiastical  depu- 
ties, the  bisho|)s  and  the  local  princes ;  but  they  were  generally  repelled  by 
those  who  resided  in  the  convents,  sometimes  with  subtilty  and  insolence,  and 
sometimes  with  powerless  desperation,  (a)  A  careful  system  of  legishition 
respecting  the  rights  and  duties  of  the  private  members  of  the  orders  was 
gradually  perfected  in  the  decretals,  (b)  The  prohibition  issued  at  the  fourth 
Council  of  Lateran  (§  204)  was  not  sufficient  to  prevent  a  monastic  commu- 
nity from  sometimes  gathering  around  some  extraordinary  master  spirit,  or 
from  being  gradually  and  imperceptibly  formed  where  persons  of  like  dispo- 
sitions were  brought  into  contact.  These  j)eculiar  associations  generally  found 
some  pope  who  could  be  induced  to  recognize  them  as  incorporate  commu- 
nities. The  peculiar  circumstances  of  the  age  which  had  called  into  exist- 
ence and  given  such  success  to  the  mendicant  friars,  induced  many  to  follow 
their  example ;  but  for  want  of  some  effective  and  pri»minent  character  in  the 
commencement,  they  could  never  attain  important  fonn  or  influence.  Inno- 
cent IV.  (1245;,  to  console  the  Carmelite  for  the  loss  of  the  Holy  Land,  con- 
ceded to  them  the  privileges  of  mendicant  friars.  (<?)  Aleicand^  IV.  (1256) 
conferred  the  same  privileges  upon  the  Angvstinian  Hermits^  whom  he 
gathered  together  from  various  scattered  associations  of  monks,  and  united 
under  the  rule  of  Augustine,  (d)    Martin  F.,  after  exhibiting  many  tokens 


0)  Kapp%  Ref.  Urk.  voL  II.  p.  897.  499.  Htnke^  Frofgclstcrci  n.  Atbeismus  in  Itolien.  Anb.  z. 
Ucbere.  v.  ViUer»y  u.  d.  Itef  ]>.  4G98S. 

a)  Instaromniutn:  Jo.  Bunch  (d.  1479;  de  reform.  monaBterioram  quorondam  Saxon.  {^Leibn^ 
Scrr.  Brunnu,  vol.  II.  (>.  476.  SOdss.) 

//)  Greg.  III.  81.  Scxt  III,  14.     CU.m.  Ill,  9.    Ejrtr.  comm.  III.  3.  &  others. 

c)  Bullarlum  Carinclltanutn.  Rom.  171'»ss.  I*.  I.  p.  4m. 

d)  Bullarlum  Kuiil  vol.  I.  p.  Iia  Acta  SS.  Fcbr.  vol  XL  p.  447. 


OHAP.  in.    ECCLES.  UFE.    1 274.  CONVENTS,    f  275.  BEOHINES.  317 

of  1)19  dislike  toward  them,  granted  similar  privileges  to  the  Servitet  (Servi  b. 
Horuie  Virg.),  an  order  which  originated  (1238)  in  a  religions  excitement 
among  some  gentlemen  belonging  to  the  principal  families  of  Florence,  and 
which  was  intended  to  celebrate  the  honors  of  the  divine  Virgin  and  her  sor- 
rows, (e)  Colomhino^  while  pemsing  the  lives  of  the  saints  was  excited  to 
renonpce  the  highest  power  in  the  government  of  Siena  for  the  most  menial 
occupations,  and  founded,  in  accordance  with  the  rule  of  Augustine,  the  order 
of  the  Jesuites^  (/)  which  was  confirmed  by  Urban  V.  (1367)  as  an  order  of 
meiidic^mt  lay  brethren,  but  was  abolished  by  Clement  IX.  (1668)  as  wealthy 
padri  del*  acquavite.  Finally  Francisco  de  Paolo  (d.  1507),  whose  life  is 
represented  to  have  been  a  monstrous  caricature  of  the  life  of  Jesus,  founded 
an  exaggerated  resemblance  of  the  order  of  the  Minorites,  in  that  of  the 
Minimi^  incorporated  by  Sixtus  IV.  (1474)  and  confirmed  with  a  gi'odual 
enlargement  of  their  rule  by  Alexander  VI.  (1492,  1501),  and  Julius  II. 
(1506).  ig)  In  Spain  and  in  Italy  there  were  certain  hermits,  who  were  united 
in  congregations,  and  assumed  the  name  of  St  Ilieronymus  (after  1370). 
Some  of  these  lived  according  to  the  rule  of  Augustine,  but  under  the  patron- 
age of  Ilieronymus,  and  others  were  governed  by  a  rule  derived  from  the 
writings  of  him  whcse  name  they  bore,  (h)  The  Olketans  (Congr.  S.  Mariae 
montis  Oliveti)  were  founded  as  a  congregation  of  Benedictines  in  a  wilder- 
ness near  Siena  by  John  Tolomei^  in  commemoration  of  the  recovery  of  his 
fflght,  and  were  recognized  by  John  XXII.  (1819).  (i)  With  the  approbation 
of  Urban  V.  (1379)  'Birgitte  (d.  1373),  a  pious  seeress,  belonging  to  the  royal 
house  of  Sweden,  who  had  fulfilled  the  duties  of  a  wife  and  a  mother, 
fonnded  the  order  of  the  Redeemer  (commonly  called  Ordo  S.  Birgittae). 
The  rule  of  this  order  required  that  there  should  be  in  each  convent  sixty 
nuns,  and  for  the  performance  of  its  spiritual  duties  thirteen  priests,  four  dea- 
cons, and  eight  lay  brethren.  All  these,  with  the  numerous  convents  of  the 
order  in  the  northern  countries,  were  to  be  under  the  control  of  the  abbess 
of  Wadiiena^^  who  was  regarded  as  the  representative  of  the  holy  Virgin,  (it) 

§  275.     More  Independent  Associations, 

As  early  as  in  the  eleventh  century  some  women  in  the  Netherlands  asso- 
ciated together,  without  entering  into  any  absolute  vows,  for  the  perform- 
ance of  works  of  mercy,  and  were  popularly  named  Beghines^  or  praying 
sisters.  Their  number  increased  during  the  thirteenth  century,  when  many 
conld  not  be  satisfied  without  something  more  than  a  connection  with  either 
the  general  Church  or  with  the  convents,  or  were  too  poor  to  assume  the 
veil.  A  more  honorable  kind  of  nunneries  (the  Canonissae  saeculares)  was 
also  established  for  the  noble  widows  and  the  orphan  children  of  the  cru- 
saders.   The  example  of  the  Beghincs  was  soon  followed  by  certain  men  who 


t)  PatUi  Florent.  Dial  de  orig.  O.  Serv.  (Lamii  Delic.  Erad.  Th.  I.  p.  las.)  . 

/)  AcUi  S9.  Jal.  Th.  VII.  p.  im^ 

g)  Acta  SS.  Apr.  Th.  I.  p.  103*8.     /A/yof,  Th.  VIL  p.  42ftw. 

h)  ITol^ten.  BrockU  Th.  III.  p.  43.  Th.  IV.  p.  Iss.        0  R'tynald,  ad  win.  182a  N.  50. 

k)  BirgitUie  rcvclaJones,  ed.  Tarrecr^mata,  Lub.  1492.  Mon.  1690.  t  &  often.  Llfo  In:  VaiUf 
««  VlUs  Aqullonla  8.  Vilae  89.  in  Scandinavia.  Col  1628.  f.  c.  notls  Erici  Ii«ti»*l,  Ups.  170S.  4.  Kule 
In  HoUten.  Brockie  Th.  III.  p.  lOOsa, 


318  MEDIAEVAL  I'UUECII  HISTORY.    PER  IV.    A.  D.  1216-1517. 

were  called  Beghards.  (a)  A  peculiar  class  of  these  people,  whose  office  it 
was  to  attend  upon  the  sick  and  to  bury  the  dead,  proceeded  also  (about 
1800)  from  the  Netherlands,  and  were  called  from  their  patron  saint 
Ahxiani^  from  the  huts  in  which  they  resided,  CelUtae^  and  from  their  low 
funeral  chants,  Lollanh  (Nollbruder).  There  was  naturally  an  intercourse 
between  these  fraternities  and  the  Tertiaries  connected  with  the  mendicant 
orders,  and  there  were  many  unobserved  transitions  from  the  one  to  the 
other.  Accordingly  after  the  middle  of  the  thirteenth  century,  when  they 
were  thrown  into  a  hostile  position  with  respect  to  the  hierarchy,  and  the 
suspicions  of  the  inquisition  had  been  awakened,  many  Beghines  betook 
themselves  to  the  communities  of  the  Tertiaries,  and  again,  when  the  Minor- 
ites became  involved  in  party  conflicts,  many  of  them  became  connected 
witli  the  Beghards  and  Lollards,  since  these  were  regarded  as  their  compan- 
ions in  sutferings  and  hopes,  and  were  likewise  then  persecuted  as  heretics. 
But  after  the  time  of  John  XXII.  the  popes  protected  against  the  inquisition 
those  engaged  only  in  works  of  charity,  {h)  In  the  same  country,  distin- 
guished as  the  Ijome  of  practicid  views,  was  formed  under  the  influence  of 
Gerhard  Groot  of  Deventer  (d.  1384),  a  powerful  preacher  of  repentance,  a 
society  called  the  BrotJura  of  the  Common  Life^  which  was  composed  prind- 
prtlly  of  clergymen  engaged  in  copying  books.  The  convent  of  regular 
canons  at  Windesheim  (1386),  with  which  all  similar  institutions  were  con- 
nected, became  the  spiritual  centre  of  this  community.  Some  of  its  mem- 
bers remained  in  connection  with  the  parishes  where  they  resided,  and  others 
lived  in  the  houses  of  the  brethren,  supj)orted  by  the  profits  derived  from 
their  common  occupations.  The  latter  were  bound  by  a  special  vow  to  re- 
fuse jdl  secular,  literary,  and  ecclesiastical  honors,  and  the  lives  of  all  were  to 
be  devoted  to  pious  exercises  and  studies,  in  which  nothing  was  to  be  allowed 
unless  it  tended  to  their  improvement.  Laymen  were  admitted  as  members, 
houses  were  also  established  for  sisters,  the  literary  education  of  the  youth 
was  conducted  on  Christian  principles,  and  the  perusal  of  the  Scriptures  in 
the  vernacular  language  was  encouraged,  but  the  grand  object  of  the  society 
wjis  the  cultivation  of  their  own  spiritual  happiness,  (c) 

§  270.     The  Templars  and  the  Knights  of  St,  John.     Cont.  from  §  211. 

liaynald.  ad  anii.  1307-13.  P.  du  Put/y  Ilbt  dc  la  condamnaUon  dc8  Templlere.  Par.  1650.  4. 
Frkf.  1C65.  4.  Mofdtinhtiic^r^  Trocoris  gogen  <l  O.  d.  TtMnpl.  a.  d.  Acton  d.  papstl.  Commiss^.  IlaoiK 
1792.  /{(ii/nouard,  M<muincns,  lilst  relalifa.  a  la  condamnatiun  des  Chevaliers  du  Temple.  Par. 
1S18.  In  MU'helrt,  Proccs  des  TemplW'ra.  Par.  1841.  4.  Jtaiilard  de  Chamhure^  Kt-gle  et  BtatutM 
secrets  des  Tcuip.,  prcccdcc»  de  Tbl^t.  do  retablibseinent,  de  la  destruction  et  de  la  continuation 
UKxIernc.  Par.  1S41. 

Dark  rumors  began  to  prevail  respecting  the  secret  crimes  committed  by 

a)  Mosheinu,  de  Begliardls  ct  Be»:uinabus.  ed.  Martini ^  Lps.  1T90.  E.  Ifallmann^  Gesch.  d.  Ur^pr. 
d.  belgisjjl.en  Bej^lilnen.  Berl.  1S43,     [Mosheim.  Ecclea.  Hist,  Cent  XIII.  Chap,  IL  $  40.  note  r.) 

h)  Bulla  of  John  XXII.  and  Grog.  XI.  1818.  1374.  and  1377.  in  MotthHm.  Lap.  896.  401.  627. 

c)  I.  Lives  of  Gerliord  and  FlorenUus  by  Thomas  a  KempU.  (0pp.  ed.  SoinmaliuM^  Antu.  1(507. 
4.  p.  7C5.)  J.  BuHchy  Chronicon  Windesemense,  ed.  JiofnceUle,  Antu.  1621.— IL  Clarine  (Son  and 
Father)  over  den  Gee»l  en  do  Denkwijze  van  Gecrt  Groot  (Archief  voor  kerlcel^e  G^chiedenis. 
1829.  vol.  I.  p.  855.  1830.  vol.  II.  p.  847.)  Delprat,  over  de  Broedcrechap  van  G.  Oroote.  L'trechL 
1980.  with  an  App.  by  Mohnike^  Lpz.  1840.     UUmann^  Reformatoren  v.  d.  Be£  voL  IL  p.  6289. 


CHAP.  IIL    BCCLE8.  LIFE,    f  276.  TEMPLARS.    KNIGHTS  OF  ST.  JOHN.       319 

tbe  Templare.     PhUijy  tho  Fair  commenced  an  actual  investij?ation  of  these, 
by  the  imprisonment  of  all  the  Templars  then  in  France,  for  which  he  had 
made  secret  preparation,  and  hy  the  confiscation  of  their  property  (Oct.  18, 
1307).     The  charges  es[)Ocially  urged  against  them  were  a  denial  of  Christ, 
adoration  of  the  idol  called  Baphomet,  and  unnatural  lewdness.     Tlie  pro- 
ceedings before  the  royal  connnission  at  Paris,  which  issued  in  the  condem- 
nation of  tho  order,  were  characterized  by  the  grossest  injustice  and  illegali- 
ties.   It  is  indeed  true  that  more  than  once  the  interests  of  Christendom  had 
been  sacrificed  to  the  selfish  policy  of  the  order,  and  it  is  probable  that  some 
knights  had  been  guilty  of  unnatural  vices,  that  the  order  had  become  per- 
vaded by  a  spirit  hostile  to  the  Church,  and  that  a  few  Grand  Comnianderies 
bad  been  indifferent  to  the  religious  controversies  of  the  day.    Nothing, 
however,  was  legally  proved  against  the  order.    It  was  evident  that  Philip 
was  eager  to  get  possession  of  the  wealth  belonging  to  tho  Templars,  and  to 
break  up  the  government  which  they  had  formed  within  and  independent  of 
his  own.     Clement  V.  sacrificed  them  to  obtain  the  favor  of  the  king,  and 
this  proud  order  of  knights  could  expect  no  aid,  for  it  had  lost  the  friendship 
of  the  clergy  (//)    Even  before  the  proceedings  were  concluded,  fifty-four 
knights  were  burned  by  order  of  Philip  (May  12,  1310),  because  no  confes- 
rion  could  be  extorted  from  them  by  all  the  power  of  the  rack.    As  a  matter 
of  expediency  and  not  from  regard  to  a  judicial  sentence,  the  order  was 
abolished  by  Clement  (May  3,  1312).  (h)     Its  property  was  to  have  been 
given  to  the  other  orders  of  knighthood,  but  in  France  the  king  firmly 
grasped  the  reword  of  his  guilt.    James  of  Molay^  the  Grand  ^Master  of  tho 
order,  who  with  other  high  functionaries  had  been  condemned  to  perpetual 
imprisonment,  was  burned  (March  19,  1814)  because  he  j)ublicly  denied  cer- 
tain confessions  alleged  to  have  been  made  by  him.  (r)    The  people  looked 
npon  his  death  as  that  of  a  martyr,  and  upon  that  of  the  king  and  of  tho 
pope,  which  speedily  followed  it,  as  special  citations  to  the  bar  of  God.    Tho 
(ate  of  the  expiring  order  in  the  several  countries  where  it  prevailed  was 
different,  according  to  the  justice  or  favor  shown  toward  it  by  the  princes 
and  bishops,  and  the  courage  and  unanimity  exhibited  by  the  knights  them- 
selves.   Except  in  France,  they  generally  were  pennitted  to  enjoy  hfe,  lib- 
erty, and  a  competent  support  during  life.     The  memory  of  the  sainted 
Molay,  and  a  hope  that  the  ruined  Temple  would  in  some  future  day  be  re- 
stored, was  secretly  spread  abroad  among  the  people. — The  Knights  of  St. 
John,  deprived  of  Ptolemais  by  the  Saracens,  settled  in  Cyprus,  but  having 
conquered  Rhodes  (1310),  they  afterwards  made  it  the  principal  seat  of  their 
order.    The  tragical  fate  of  the  Templars,  in  whose  guilt  they  had  partici- 
pated and  whoso  rivals  they  had  been,  was  not  beheld  by  them  in  vain.     As 
^ey  were  generally  connected  with  the  nohility  of  Eur<)i)e,  and  po^s^ssed 


o)  Xicoliii  CL  d.  Be<chuI<Hjrunjfon,  welche  deni  T.  O.  comacbt  wonlen.  Ilrl.  17S2.  On  tho  i>ther 
•M«:  Ihrdf,  In  thfl  Morcnr.  March,  17S8.  Munt^r  In  Honki's  N.  Mag.  vol.  V.  p.  3Ms:«.  hmnrnfir, 
^rtertam  Baphomctiit  revoUtnm.  (Fumlprub.  d.  Orl.  181S.  vol.  VI.  i»t  1.)  Rnynonard  In  the 
'own.  drt  Sarans,  Mar«,  Avr.  1S19.  Blblloth.  univ.  vol.  X.  p.  827.  XI.  p.  a. 

^)  JT.iMi  vol.  XXV.  p.  8*9. 

0  VVUini  VIII,  92.  C^ntln.  Chron.  Gnu,  ae  Xangls  in  D'Achery  Splcil.  vol.  IIL  p.  67.  Ray 
**««i  L  c  p.  SO60& 


320  MEDIAEVAL  CHUKCII  IIISTOKY.    PER.  IV.    A*.  D.  1216-1M7. 

great  power  on  the  sen,  their  order  hecmne  a  fbrniidable  bulwark  of  Chrb- 
tendom  against  the  Turks. 


CHAP.  IV.— ECCLESIASTICAL  LITERATURE. 

§  277.     ScJwlasticism.     Second  Period.     ISth  Century.     Cont.  frofn  §  218. 

Paris  now  gave  unequivocal  evidence  that  it  had  become  the  principal 
seat  of  a  scholasticism  which  developed  its  maturity  in  intimate  connection 
with  academic  life.  The  Physics,  the  Metaphysics,  and  the  Ethics  of  Ariii- 
totle  were  introduced  by  the  x\rabians,  and  even  Thomas  made  use  of  e 
translation  from  the  original  Greek,  (a)  The  hierarchy  wore  indeed  jealous 
of  the  ascendency  of  a  heathen  philosopher,  and  attempted  (after  1210)  to 
l>rohihit  the  use  of  the  whole,  or  at  least  of  a  part  of  his  writings,  but  oven 
the  power  of  the  Church  was  ineffectual  against  a  prevalent  intellectual  ten- 
dency of  the  age.  Through  the  influence  of  the  mendicant  friars  especially, 
this  philosopher  was  regarded  as  the  harbinger  of  Christ,  and  the  representa- 
tive of  all  natural  science,  in  accordance  with  whose  principles  the  eternal 
truth  of  the  doctrines  of  the  Church  may  be  proved,  and  a  systematic  con- 
nection between  them  may  be  established.  (/>)  But  the  spirit  of  the  Chnreh 
was  as  powerful  as  a  philosophy  which  was  obliged  to  direct  its  energies 
wherever  tlie  liighest  intellectual  interest  existed.  The  Franciscan  Alexan- 
df-r  of  Jlalc^^^  a  master  of  theology  in  Paris  (Doctor  irrefragibilis,  d.  1245),  by 
his  acute  analysis  of  all  j)Ossible  questions,  already  indicated  what  was  to  be 
the  next  form  philosophy  would  assume,  and  at  the  same  time  showed  by  his 
practical  ecclesiastical  tendencies  the  peculiar  character  which  it  then  pos- 
sessed, (r)  Tlie  little  Dominican  Albertm  of  Bollstadt  (d.  1280),  in  the  midst 
of  his  various  academic  and  ecclesiastical  engagements,  made  a  collection  of 
all  the  knowledge  of  his  age.  From  the  Arabians  he  derived  a  knowledge 
of  nature  and  of  its  mysteries,  {d)  By  his  history  of  the  Winter  Garden  and 
of  the  Speaking  Head,  he  obtained  the  reputation  of  being  a  wizard  and  a 
man  of  the  people,  (')  and  from  his  relation  to  his  still  greater  pupil,  the 
saint,  he  received  the  appellation  of  the  Great.  The  Dominican  Thomm 
(Count)  of  Aquino  (d.  1274),  who  taught  in  Cologne,  Paris,  Rome,  and  other 
cities  of  Italy  (Doctor  angelicus),  and  who  refused  the  office  of  archbisliop  of 
Na])les,  his  native  country,  may  be  regarded  as  the  highest  point  of  Scholfls* 
ticism.  Subtle  and  profound,  full  of  enthusiasm  in  behalf  of  the  doctrines 
of  the  Church  as  well  as  of  philosophy,  he  made  a  powerful  effort  to  effect  a 
reconciliation  between  Aristotle,  Plato,  and  Augustine.    The  order  to  which 

(7)  Jourdfiin,  ([k  237.)  p.  4'i5<.  ISOss. 

h)  Jonrdoin^  p.  IQS.-v.  BuUuua  vol.  III.  p.  SI.  14088.  Launoius^  de  varia  Aristot  in  Acad. 
Par.  fort  una.  Par.  H»9.  4.  ed.  J.  11.  ab  EUwich,  Vit  1720.  Acta  Philosophor.  llaL  172a  St  XL  pu 
710.  tt.  XV.  p.  869. 

c)  Snraina  unlv.  Tliool.  In  1.  IV.  Sontt  Ven.  1475.  Col.  1622.  4  vols,  t 

0)  After  the  Coinniontarios  upon  ArLototlo  and  Lombard u.%  consnlt  Summa  Thcol.,  pbyatc  wd 
a^t^ol.  writings  Opp.  ed.  P.  Januni/,  Lufd.  1C51.  21  vols.  t—Iiutlol.  Notiomagentia  de  vitA  AlU 
MagnL  O.L  1490.  f. 

e)  Gdrrta:  toiit  Volksbucb.  p.  27s8.    Volks-  u.  Meistcrlieder.  Ueldelb.  1817.  pw  MSan. 


CHAP.  IV     ECCLES.  LIT.    1 27a  SCHOLASTICISM.    SC0TU8.  321 

he  belonged  has  been  accustomed  to  regard  his  Snmina  as  the  most  perfect 
development  of  Christian  science,  and  even  the  Chnrch,  after  some  hesitation, 
finally  received  it  as  a  work  in  which  Christ  himself  might  find  pleasure.  (/) 

§  278.    Scholasticism.     Third  Period.     14:th  and  15th  Centuries. 

When  the  highest  intellectual  energies  had  been  exerted  to  harmonize  the 
two  great  anthorities  of  the  age,  the  only  alternative  for  science  in  its  pro- 
gress, was  to  direct  its  attention  to  the  differences  which  existed  between 
them.     Bnt  this  struggle  with  the  internal  and  external  power  of  the  Church 
was  manifested  in  a  play  of  bold  questions  which  exceeded  the  proper 
province  of  theology,  and  although  they  were  all  so  decided  as  not  to  con- 
flict with  the  doctrines  of  the  Church,  in  the  mere  proposal  of  them  intellec- 
tQftl  free<lom  was  preserved,  and  an  obscure  dissatisfaction  was  shown  toward 
the  limitations  im[>osed  upon  it.    The  remark  that  a  principle  might  be  true 
in  philosophy  and  yet  bo  false  in  theology,  betrays  the  doubt  which  Scholas- 
tiwm  felt  with  respect  to  its  own  ultimate  tendencies.    The  leaders  of  this 
school  generally  came  from  those  orders  which  were  most  prone  to  dwagree 
with  the  Church.     Duns  Scotus^  a  teacher  in  Oxford,  Paris,  and  Cologne 
(Doctor  subtilis,  d.  1308),  recognized  man  as  an  individual  created  by  the 
Holy  Ghost,  and  consequently  in  his  original  condition  pure  and  free,  but 
limited  by  his  connection  with  the  world,  and  capable  of  redemption,  so  as 
to  possess  a.  true  divine  intuition  only  by  the  power  of  the  Church,  (a) 
William  of  Occam ^  a  teacher  in  Paris  (venerabilis  inceptor),  after  1322  the 
provincial  of  the  Franciscan  order  in  England,  and  after  1328  a  resident  at 
the  court  of  Louis  (p.  299,  d.  1847),  wielded  the  sword  of  a  free  spirit  not 
only  in  his  doctrine  but  in  his  life.     He  however  knew  no  other  way  to  res- 
.  CQc  the  absolute  doctrines  of  the  Church  but  by  asserting,  in  accordance  with 
»new  form  of  Nominalism,  the  subjective  conditions  under  which  all  human 
knowledge  must  be  placed.  (7;)    The  old  controversy  respecting  Nominalism 
*M  consequently  revived,  and  although  Louis  XI.  had  proscribed  (1473)  it  us 
dtnijerous,  and  with  a  similar  stretch  of  arbitrary  power  had  subsequently 
(1481)  (r)  invited  a  free  discussion  of  it,  victory  now  preponderated  in  its 
^▼or.    The  Franciscans,  delighted  with  the  prospect  of  opposing  the  niys- 
tenoos  subtlety  of  their  Scotus  to  the  saintly  authority  of  Thomas,  now 
'^solved  to  follow  none  but  him.    The  controversies  respecting  the  proper 
^its  of  human  freedom,  the  satisfaction  of  Christ,  and  the  sinlessness  of 
^'•'y,  were  only  subordinate  elements  in  the  intricate  conflict  in  which  the 
^^iif«  and  the  Seotists,  the  Realists  and  the  Nominalists^  proved  the  full 


f)  Cnmna.  In  1.  IV.  Sentcntlarnm.  Snmma  Theol.  in  8  P.  (8  vols.  Incompletfs  snpplied  by  Suppl. 
«C«mni.  in  4  L  Sentt)  CommenL  Q.  BRcher  d.  Arlat  n.  d.  h.  Schrift,  apolog.  n.  asket  Schrr.  0pp. 
^1570, 17  vola.  t  and  often.  Ven.  lT45ss.  28  vols.  A.— Acta  SS.  Mart  vol.  I.  p.  655.  Touron, 
^*«S.  Tbomas.  Par.  1787.  4  Bern,  de  Rttbeis  de  gestis  et  Scrr.  B.  Thomac,  Von.  1750.  t  Kling 
'■'l^TbwL  d.  Thtim.  (S^ffler'a  rel.  Zeitschr.  198a  vol.  IIL  H.  1.)  IT.  l/oerttl,  Thorn,  u.  b.  ZelL 
^•lM«i  [Art  in  Kitto's  Journal  of  Bib.  Lit  vol.  I.  p.  1.] 
*)  <^>aestionea  in  1.  IV.  8entt  QaesU.  qoodlibefales  XL  0pp.  ed.  Wadding,  Logd.  1689bii.  IS  Th. 

,  ''•  ^  Albergoni  Besolutio  doctr.  Scotlcae.  Logd.  1648.    Baumgarien-CrutiuB^  de  TbeoL  SootL 

^l«ll 

^)  Qoaettlonct  saper  1.  IV.  Betitt  Centlloqalaro  tbeol.  Lngd.  1495.  f. 
')  ArioMi  Th.  V.  pi  706aBL    Comp.  UUmann^  Weasel  p.  827aa. 

21 


322  MEDIAEVAL  CHURCH  HISTOKY.    PER.  IV.    A.  D.  121«-l5i:. 

power  of  their  intellectual  and  spiritual  weapons.  (<7)  The  systematic  char- 
acter of  Scholasticism  became  much  relaxed  in  such  polemic  engagements, 
and  in  the  conflicts  of  the  schools  it  lost  its  religious  earnestness.  Its  decline 
had  already  commenced  when  it  refused  its  countenance  to  the  riew  form  in 
which  science  now  made  its  appearance.  It  had,  however,  aroused  men  to 
freedom  of  thought,  given  a  rigidly  scientific  form  to  the  doctrines  of  faith, 
and  presented  the  true  questions  on  which  philosophy  should  be  employed. 
It  had  therefore  fulfilled  its  destiny  by  giving  a  definite  form  to  the  existing 
materials.  Gahriei  Biel  (d.  1495)  is  usually  mentioned  as  the  last  of  the 
Scholastics.  lie  was  the  faithful  counsellor  of  Count  Eberhard  in  the  estab- 
lishment of  the  high  school  of  Tubingen  (1477),  and  was  intimately  con- 
nected with  Occam  in  a  liberal  opposition  to  the  papacy.  He  was  also  much 
engaged  in  making  known  the  Ethics  of  Aristotle,  but  he  was  of  a  modest 
spirit,  and  inclined  to  favor  a  scriptural  and  j)ractical  Christianity,  {t) 

§  279.     Mi/HticiHm,     Second  Period.     Cont,  from  §  219. 

Amol'I,  Lebcn  d.  GIfiubU;en.  Hal.  1701.  A  mold  i  Hist,  et  descr.  Thcol.  mysUcae.  Fret  1702.  p. 
292S8.  Ue  Wet4^,  chr.  8ittenl.  Brl.  1821.  toI.  II.  II.  2.  p.  220i«.  C/u  Schmidt,  Ettsal  snr  los  iiysUquos 
du  quatorzicnio  biccle.  Strasb.  1886.  4.  Vllmann,  Kefomiatoren  vord.  Ref.  vol.  II.  p.  ]25s«.  F. 
GalU,  Golstl.  Stlmmen  a.  d.  M;V.  Hal.  1841.—/'.  P/eiffer,  dcutsche  Myittiker  d.  14.  Jahrh.  Lpt  1S4& 
voL  I.  (the  less  Important.) 

The  course  of  Scholasticism  was  always  completed  by  the  prevalence  of 
Mysticism.  It  was  not,  however,  until  it  had  become  much  degenerated  in 
the  wranglings  of  the  schools,  that  new  advocates  began  to  arise,  who  es- 
caped from  the  tumult  of  the  buyers  and  sellers  to  find  a  refuge  in  the  inner 
sanctuary,  and  now  defended  the  cause  of  Christian  feeling  principally  in  the 
German  language,  and  with  a  German  spirit.  There  were  two  tendencies 
distinguishable  among  them,  although  they  are  often  blended  together.  The 
first  was  a  class  of  persons  addicted  to  si)eculative  reveries,  and  may  be 
traced  back  to  Erigena,  Dionysius,  and  the  New  Platonists.  They  described 
the  extinction  of  all  selfishness  and  the  perfection  of  hoi}'  love  as  an  absorp- 
tion of  the  soul  in  God,  and  more  or  less  consciously  interpreted  ecclesiastical 
dogmas  simply  as  allegories.  And  yet  so  strong  were  their  moral  and  eccle- 
siastical tendencies,  tliat  this  was  always  connected  with  a  recognition  of  a 
creation,  and  of  the  historical  son  of  God.  Master  Eclard  alone,  the  pro- 
vincial of  the  Dominicans  at  Cologne,  by  his  feeling  of  nearness  and  ardent 
love  to  God,  attained  such  a  giddy  height  that  he  lost  all  consciousness  of 
the  distinction  between  God  and  man,  Christ  and  the  Christian,  good  and 
evil,  and  his  memory  was  attainted  by  the  ecclesiastical  tribunals  (1329).  (<i) 
John  Tauler^  a  Dominican  residing  at  Cologne  and  Strasbourg  (Doctor  snb- 

d)  Arada,  Controverslao  inter  9.  Thomam  ct  8cotum  super  IV.  I.  Seatt  CoL  162a  4.  Bulaeui, 
Th,  IV.  p.  208saw    Argentri  Th.  I.  p.  842s8. 

e)  Colk'ctorlutn  ex  Occamo  In  1.  IV.  Sontt  (Tub.  1502.  2  volsw)  Brix.  1574.  4  voIbl  4  Sermoi.  da 
Temp.  Tub.  1500.  A.—TrUhem.  de  Scrr.  eoc  c.  90S.  MottH  Vltae  I*To«efia.  Tubing.  Tub.  17ia  1 
Decas  Llf.W.  Biel.  (pr.  Wemmlorf)  de  Gab.^Blcl,  celeberrimo  Paptsta  AnUpaplata.  VIL  in».  4 

o)  liaymild,  ad  ann.  1829.  N.  70.  Doctn^  ^flscell.  z.  Gesch.  d.  deuL  Literat  vol  L  p.  MSaa.  C 
Schmidt,  ^^eister  Eckard.  (Stud.  u.  Krit  1889.  U.  &)  JK  MarUnten,  Melster  Kek.  Th«oL  Stodie. 
Hamb.  1842. 


CHAP.  IV.    ECCLE8.  LIT.    $  ^9.  TAULEB.    KUYSBBOEK.    8US0.  323 

litnis  et  illnroinatns,  d.  1861),  after  preaching  for  some  time  in  a  spiritual  and 
acceptable  manner,  became  convinced  by  a  layman  (Nicolas  of  Basle)  that  his 
spirit  had  never  been  traly  consecrated  to  God  by  a  complete  death  to  the 
world  and  to  himself.     lie  immediately  became,  in  consequence  of  his  utter 
despair  of  himself,  a  most  awakening  preacher  to  others.     In  strange  lan- 
guage he  allured  them  to  seek  for  intellectual  poverty  as  the  true  way  to 
become  like  God,  and  invited  them  to  taste  the  delicious  pleasure  of  com- 
pletely dying  in  God.  (//)     Standing  in  no  need  of  sensible  imagery,  and  set 
at  liberty  by  God  himself,  he  preached  that  the  spiritual  and  the  temporal 
sword  should  never  be  used  in  the  place  of  one  another ;  that  in  the  con- 
flicts between  civil  princes  the  jKwr  innocent  people  should  not  bo  placed 
ander  the  curse,  and  that  if  they  were,  the  curse  would  become  a  blessing. 
It  was  not  long  before  he  himself  experienced  the  power  of  such  a  curse,  (e) 
John  Rvyfibroth  (Doctor  ec»8taticus,  d.  1881),  having  been  long  employed  in 
the  service  of  the  Church,  sought  to  find  a  quiet  retirement  in  the  Angus- 
tinian  convent  of  Gruenthal,  near  Brussels,  in  which  ho  recorded  his  thoughts 
in  a  simple  and  monotonous  but  lofty  manner,  under  the  impression  that 
they  were  inspired  by  God.     He  described  the  sacred  frenzy  of  love  as 
nierely  a  state  of  transition,  and  the  higher  life  as  a  perpetual  birth  of  the 
Sob  and  an  everlasting  effusion  of  the  Holy  S])irit  within  us.    He  warned 
men  against  spiritual  indolence,  recognized  the  moral  power  of  the  will,  but 
commended  mental  ecstasy  as  the  highest  state  of  existence,  because  in  it 
num  is  released  from  the  images  and  veils  of  his  own  being,  and  sunk  in  the 
abyss  of  divine  love.  ('/)     Even  the  German  Theology  of  the  fifteenth  cen- 
tnry  expended  its  principal  strength  in  discussing  subjects  relating  to  perfec- 
tion and  its  several  degrees,  the  extinction  of  Adam  and  the  formation  of 
Christ  in  us,  and  the  necessary  processes  of  becoming  human  and  divine. 
Tb«e  expressions,  however,  could  readily  have  been  adopted  by  a  simple 
pious  spirit,  as  mere  descriptions  of  that  revelation  of  an  exalted  love  of 
God  out  of  which  they  sprung,  (f)     A  transition  from  this  position  may  be 
noticed  in  the  Dominican  Henry  Suso  (d.  in  Ulm,  1305),  uho  was  said  to 
btve  been  named  Amandus  by  God  himself.     Even  in  liis  youth  he  had  been 
remarkable  for  an  alloetionate  spirit,  and  troubled  with  the  sorrows  of  every 
tiling  around  him.    He  appears  in  the  character  of  a  Snabian  Minnesinger, 


MNicbfuIgiinsr<lc»armen  I-*bons  Chrlstl,  Murk  iL  :>«'eIo,  A;  others.  Lpz.  149S.  Ausr^b.  l.'SO^.  Ai  often. 
V«iisf«nf.»nnc«l  to  tlie  present  forms  of  lanffoaffe,  and  ed.  by  C*i>'H<>det\  Luz.  Ivi.S.  T'li changed 
•*l"a«»ft!i^  arnu-n  Lt-bi-ns  C.hristl.  with  lexicon  TKuIerisinnm  by  Si-fi lin^a^r,  Vrkf.  1n83.  von  d. 
LAlwnn^  Ilerm.  Sulz.  IVM.  Oi>p.  ]»t.  rodd.  Sitriutf,  Col.  IM**.  f.  Predlgrttn.  Frkf.  IS^fl  3  vols. 
lV#a\f,|  {q  ihe!»e,  the  lii.-tory  <»f  hi*  converHon  by  himself:  Historic'  des  Ehrw.  d.  Joh.  Taulcr. — 
^'^«M'*(«,  Meinoria  Taul.  in.-taur.  Vit  ICSS.  4.  Oherliu,  de  Taul.  dictione  vern.  et  niyst  Arg. 
"^i  f.  .SiAm/<//,  J.  Taul.  Ilamb.  1841.  i?M</f/6rtc^,  chr.  Biogr.  pt  187»s.  [B.  Buehniig.J.T. 
*•  i  Freonde  Gottfii.  Lp».  18r4.  12.] 

f)  Si>fcmn*»  Collectaneen  a<i  ann.  1850.    SchtfiUN,  p.  ^'^8^ 

'^'iHromatu  i«pirltnalinm  nuptiarum.  Speculum  aeL  sal ut la,  etc.  0pp.  e.  Brabantiae  permanico 
**«>' «ediL  lat  i*r /-.  Surium,  Col.  ir>55.  f  and  often.  His  Vita  by  a  brother  Doininiran  of  the 
"♦^tftoemion  ,.(,YJi^  by  Surlus.  Four  treatlsea  of  Rush,  in  Low  Germ.  (ed.  by  Ar*ntncaldt) 
****V  Cllmann,  Ran.  l$iS.—Engt/h<irdt  (p.  ^>.  n.  b.)  p.  IGSas. 

«)Tent»<.he  Theohjgia,  ed.  by  Luther,  Witt  TM6.  4  by  Grfll  Brl.  1S17.  by  F.  L.  Kriiffsr, 
^^"^  IStt  by  Dete^i-,  Erl.  1S27.  by  TroxUr,  S.  C.  alien,  1887.  by  VUMtnthal,  BerL  1S42.  by  Pfe^- 
MStitti.  1S5L  comp.  UUmann,  In  Stud.  n.  Krit  1S52.  U.  4. 


324  MEDIAEVAL  CHURCH  HISTOBT.    PER.  IT.    A.  D.  121«-1517. 

bnt  the  mistress  of  his  affections,  to  whom  he  devoted  himself  in  mysterious 
longings,  and  with  all  the  passion  of  yoath,  was  eternal  Wisdom.  In  parsnit 
of  this  he  tortured  himself  for  many  years,  until  his  nature  became  utterly 
wasted.  He  was  then  favored  by  God  with  still  severer  trials,  in  the  endur- 
ance of  which  he  succeeded  in  attaining  the  tranquillity  of  divine  love,  and 
became  lost  in  that  divine  nature  which  is  the  real  essence  of  all  creatures. 
His  fundamental  doctrine  was,  that  a  passive  human  being  must  be  divested 
of  the  creature,  formed  anew  in  the  likeness  of  Christ,  and  perfected  in  the 
Deity.  There  was  a  vigorous  moral  spirit  in  his  ardent  love  which  sought  to 
save  every  thing  ruined  by  sin  around  him.  (/)  The  other  tendency  of  Mys- 
ticism was  directed  to  the  simple  wants  of  the  heart  and  of  the  people. 
Thomas  (Ilamerken)  of  Kempen^  a  canon  of  the  convent  of  Mount  St.  Agnes, 
near  Zwoll  (d.  1471),  in  spite  of  his  zeal  for  monasticism  and  the  worship  of 
the  Blessed  Virgin,  by  his  writings  as  well  as  by  his  private  counsels  uncon- 
sciously led  many  from  the  Roman  Church  to  the  true  Church  of  the  heart, 
by  a  quiet  communion  of  the  soul  with  God  and  Jesus  Christ.  ({/)  The  book 
on  the  Imitation  of  Christ,  respecting  the  author  of  which  whole  onlers  of 
monks  and  nations  have  contended,  became  a  kind  of  Bible  for  the  people, 
and  in  quiet  contrast  v^ith  the  worship  of  the  saints,  the  formal  life  pursued 
in  the  convents,  and  the  fables  of  the  Minorites,  set  forth  the  true  spiritual 
following  of  Jesus  in  the  destruction  of  all  selfishness,  and  in  the  exercise  of 
a  love  which  unconditionally  surrendered  itself  to  God.  (A)  This  branch  of 
Mysticism  had  a  seminary  which  was  maintained  among  the  Brethren  of  the 
common  life. 

§  280.     Exceases  and  Compromises, 

From  what  is  related  of  Tournay^  it  is  evident  that  Scholasticism  had 
.the  presumption  to  imagine  that  the  very  existence  of  Christianity  depended 
upon  its  power  and  its  logic,  (a)  Scholasticism  was  accused  of  forgetting  the 
word  of  God  while  contending  about  mere  words,  of  frittering  away  the 
earnestness  of  the  Christian  life  by  its  sophistries,  of  driving  away  animation 
by  its  frigid  learning,  and  of  making  theologians  seem  like  fantastic  vision- 

/)  Llfo  of  IL  8u9o  by  himself.  BCicblein  v.  d.  ew.  Welshelt,  and  other  nrritlngn.— Lcben  a. 
Schrifttin  Recording  to  tlie  old  style  of  writing  and  printing  by  DUpenhrock^  with  Einl.  t.  G^rr€\ 
Katisb.  1829.  0pp.  latt  red.  Stirius,  Col  15&&  QeistL  Biathen.  v.  Soso.  Bonn.  ISM.  C  Schmidt, 
H.  Soso.  (Stud.  u.  Krit  1848.  11.  4.) 

ff)  Soliloqaia  aniinae.  Exercitia  spiritnalla.  Uortalas  roaar.  YallLs  liliorum.  Hoepltato  panpenim. 
Vitae  Beatorum.  Dial  Novitiorum.  0pp.  ed.  Sommalius,  Col.  1560.  4.  and  often.  Aaseerl  Schrr. 
Weim.  1S24.  4  vols.  Siimmtl.  Werkc  uebcra.  v.  Silhtrt,  Vienna.  ISSSaa.  4  vols.  [TransL  Into  Engl 
Lond.  2  vols.  \%.'\—ScKolU,  Th.  a  K.  sent  de  re.  chr.  exponitar.  Gron.  1889.  J5L  Bukring^  Th.  v. 
K.  Brl.  1849. 

h)  De  iinitatione  Ch.  Argent  1472  often  and  in  varioos  languages  since  Fahric,  BibL  med.  et  InC 
Lat  vol.  IV.  p.  214aa.  [Imiution  of  C.  new  ed.  Lond.  1849.  8.]— G'.  d«  Ortgory,  Memoins  car  le 
vdritable  auteur  do  rimltation  de  J.  C.  revu  p.  le  Comte  Lanjvinais,  Par.  1827.  Whb  app.  by 
WeigL,  Sulzb.  1882.  Silhert^  Gersen,  Gerson  u.  Kcmpia,  welcher  ist  Vrl  Ac  YIen,  1828.  G.  i* 
Or«gory,  de  imit  Cb.  Aquae  8ext.  1888.  Ullmann^  Reformatoren.  voL  II.  SapiJeroent  J.  R 
Malou,  Rechercbes  sur  le  veriUble  aatenr.  (acad.  royale  de  Belgiqae.  Brax.  184a  4  vola.  XIV.)— 8e- 
eandus  tract  de  imit.  Chr.  ed.  Liebner,  Goet  1842.  Cooap.  UUmann  In  Stad.  n.  Krit  1818.  H.  1. 
[and  BaehHng,  in  Stud.  u.  Krit  1850.  H.  a]     -^ 

a)  M(it  Paris  ad  ann.  1201.  p.  144.  Bat  oomp.  Rmr,  OandavensU  L.  do  aerr.  eoc  c.  H 
{FiMbric  Bibl.  eo&  vol.  IL  p.  121.) 


CHAP.  lY.    ECCLES.  LIT.    f  88a  BONAVENTUBA.    OERSON.  325 

arieB  in  the  eyes  of  other  learned  men.    With  such  views,  Gerson  and  Nicolas 
of  CUimengU  demanded  that  the  course  of  theological  studies  should  be  re- 
formed, (i)    There  was,  however,  so  much  of  truth  on  the  side  of  both 
Scholastir.ism  and  Mysticism,  that  the  compromise  which  had  been  effected 
between  them  could  not  be  abandoned.    This  compromise  was  attempted 
daring  the  most  flourishing  period  of  Scholasticism  by  lionaxentura  (Jobn  of 
Fidanza,  Dootor  seraphicus,  d.  1274),  and  during  its  decline  by  Genon  (John 
Charlier,  Doctor  Christianissimus,  d.  1429),  but  it  was  attained  rather  in  tlieir 
personal  lives  than  in  a  scientific  form.    Bonaventura  strictly  conformed  to 
the  mles  of  Scholasticism,  but  ho  has  enlivened  its  most  subtle  definitions 
with  the  ardor  of  his  own  feelings.    His  affectionate  spirit  contemplate^l 
both  the  internal  and  the  external  life  as  a  mirror  of  the  eternal  reality, 
thongh  he  was  not  anfrequently  invited  to  the  most  extensive  spheres  of  ac- 
tivity in  the  Church.    He  is  one  of  those  exalted  forms  in  which  the  eccle- 
siastical spirit  most  complacently  exhibits  its  glories.    We  need  not  wonder, 
therefore,  that  the  representatives  both  of  the  Eastern  and  of  the  Western 
Ghurch  mingled  their  tears  at  his  tomb,  (c)    From  the  position  of  Mysticism, 
which  he  established  by  psychological  arguments,  and  fortified  by  sound 
logic,  Gerson  carried  on  a  powerful  conflict  in  behalf  of  the  true  peace  of 
the  Church  against  the  extravagances  of  the  hierarchy  and  the  errors  of  su- 
perstition. (//)    Raymond  de  Subunde^  a  Spaniard,  endeavored  to  eftect  (about 
1480)  a  more  perfect  union  of  these  opposite  parties  by  laying  aside  the 
formulas  then  generally  in  use.     "God  has  bestowed  upon  man  the  book 
of  nature,  in  which   every  creature   is  a  letter  written  by  God.     Tliis 
divine  book  and  the  Holy  Scriptures  can  never  contradict  one  another.    The 
former,  which  is  common  and  open  to  all,  is  the  primary  source  of  knowl- 
edge, is  intelligible  to  the  laity,  and  cannot  be  perverted  by  heretics.    But 
the  highest  knowledge  is  the  love  of  God,  which  is  the  only  thing  man  can 
truly  call  his  own,  to  be  offered  to  his  Creator.'*     According  to  this  signifi- 
cant train  of  thought,  it  is  not  very  diflicult  to  construct  the  doctrine  of  the 
Church  from  materials  supplied  by  the  book  of  nature,  /.  e.  from  the  internal 
and  external  experience  of  man,  who  needs  not  an  artificial  science,  but  only 
a  higher  illumination,  {e) 

V)  Gtrtonii  Epfx  doae  de  reform.  Theol.  (0pp.  vol.  I.  p.  121. 4S.)  Xic  de  Clemangi«  L.  de  studio 
T>»«>1  (.DTAcKery,  SplcIL  vol.  I.  p.  478.) 

e)  Cummentar.  in  IV.  L  Sontt  Breviloqaiam  (cd.  TTef^U^  Tub.  1S45.)  Centiloqnium.— Itinomriara 
■cwUfln  Dennu  Stiiuuliu.  Incondium  amoris.  0pp.  Jumu  SixU  V.  cnicnd.  Horn.  15SS.  S.  Th.  f.  Yen. 
Wl*  W  Th.  4. 

')  Alter  the  ecclcBiasttcal  publiftlied  wrlHngrs  rspectally :  Conslderatiooes  do  Th.  mystica  0pp. 
^l>E.du  Pin,  Anta.  ITOfi.  6  Th.  t—Lecuy,  Easai  sur  la  vl©  de  J.  Oera.  Par.  1882  2  TU.—EngfU 
*""td«  Oera.  mystico  P.  II.  ErL  1822s.  4.  Ilundeshagen  Q.  d.  myst  Th«»l.  d.  J.  Oera.  Lpa.  1884. 
(Zdtacbr.  C  Llat  Th.  voL  IV.  SL  1.)  LUbner,iL  Gers.  myst  Theol.  (Stud.  u.  Krlt.  1S.S5.  II.  2.) 
•*'^'*i,  doctr.  J.  Gers.  d.  Th.  myat  Par.  1S88.     Ch.  i'ichmiclt,  Easal  sur  Jean  Gcra.  Stra^b.  1S89. 

')  Uh,  creaturarum  a.  TheoL  nataralls.  Argent  149d.  Latiniore  stylo  in  oomp.  red.  a.  </.  0»n*>' 
"'^AiDit  1650.  12.  Solisbac  1S52.— Montaigne,  £»ais  II,  12.  D.  Matzke,  d.  nat.  Theol.  d.  K.  v. 
'^•riiL  184flu  Stud.  n.  Krit  1S4T.  U.  4. 


326  MEDIAEVAL  CHUBCU  UISEOBY.  PEB.  IV.    A.  D.  1216-151T. 

§  281.     The  sO'CalUd  Rethal  of  Literature. 

MeinerB^  Lebensbwchrr.  bcrulimte  Manner  a.  d.  z.  d.  TViederh.  d.  W.  Zur.  1795eft.  8  voli. 
Ileeren^  Gwcb.  d.  clasj«.  Lit.  i^  d.  Wlcderaufl.  d.  W.  Grjtt.  1797.  1S<»1.  2  voK  //.  A.  tYhnrJ,  Gesch. 
d.  Wii'deraufbluh.  wlss.  Bildiing  vorn.  in  Dentschl.  Magdb.  1S27  82.  8  vols.  K  KninTi  Xar.  de 
bumanitails  Etndior.  XV.  vt  XVI.  S.  in  Germ,  origlne  et  indole.  Mii^n.  1S48.  4.  Editions  of  tb« 
mwlern  Classics  and  Ibeir  Conmientaries  in  Ehert.  [//.  IlnUam^  Int.  to  the  Lit  «»f  Knr.  in  tbe  \h. 
16.  and  17.  Ccntt.  Chap.  I.  dc  II.  Lond.  1S42.  New  York.  1S47.  J.  BeHngUtn,  Lit  HIat  of  the  MfcL 
A^e&  IjonA.  1S46.  &  de  S'utmandi^  II.  of  Lit  in  tbe  South  of  Eur.  transL  by  Iio9co€,  New  York. 
1S27.  2  vols.  8.] 

A  scientific  educjition  had  been  extensively  secnred  and  diffused  by  means 
of  tbe  Universities.  These  were  sometimes  devoted  only  to  a  single  depart- 
ment of  science,  and  at  other  times  embraced  faculties  for  all  the  sciences. 
They  had  generally  been  founded  by  the  princes,  or  the  cities  in  whose  neigh- 
borhood they  were,  and  especially  in  Germany  they  were  all  conformed  to 
the  model  of  that  of  Paris.  The  first  of  these  was  established  at  Prague 
(1348),  and  the  last  at  Wittcnlerg  (1502).  But  they  were  dependent  for  all 
their  i)rivilege8  upon  the  papal  see,  and  very  readily  settled  down  in  the 
comfortable  routine  of  traditii;)nary  learning.  The  scientific  sjurit  then 
awakened  received  only  indirect  encouragement  from  these  institntions. 
The  Franciscan  Roger  Bacon  (Doctor  mirabilis,  d.  1294)  pointed  out  the 
defects  of  a  barren  knowledge  of  Scholasticism,  and  in  the  character  of  a 
proi)het  of  worldly  science,  with  geniid  energy  and  maltijdied  experiments 
penetrated  thoroughly  into  the  mysteries  of  nature,  whoso  arrangements  he 
recognized  in  every  thing,  {a)  Dante  Alighleri  (d.  1321  in  exile  at  Ravenna), 
in  his  Divine  Comedy,  effected  a  reconciliation  of  the  claims  of  love  and  reli- 
gion, and  as  in  a  General  Judgment  of  sacred  poesy  gave  an  allegoriciU  repre- 
sentation not  only  of  the  state  of  the  human  mind  and  of  his  age,  bat  of  the 
history  of  the  world.  "With  the  boldness  of  a  Ghibelline,  in  whose  eyes  the 
universal  authority  of  the  empire  was  as  truly  instituted  by  God,  and  was  as 
essential  to  the  welfare  of  the  world  as  the  papacy  itself,  he  denoancod  the 
abuses  of  the  hierarchy,  and  on  his  own  authority  canonized  or  consigned  to 
perdition  whom  he  pleased.  A  friend  of  Virgil,  he  was  no  less  an  admirer 
of  St.  Thomas,  an  enthusiast  for  ecclesiastical  doctrines,  and  the  first-bom 
son  of  the  Church  among  the  poets.  (^)  This  great  work  of  modern  genius, 
which  he  composed  in  the  language  of  the  people,  but  with  a  perfection 
worthy  of  the  best  of  the  ancient  writers,  awakened  a  spirit  which  could 
appreciate  and  confide  in  those  writers  also.  The  age  was  in  fact  now  fully 
prepared  for  a  revival  of  the  great  works  of  antiquity.  Although  the 
chissics,  especially  the  Roman,  had  never  been  entirely  forgotten,  the  true 
spirit  which  pervaded  them  had  not  been  perceived,  and  the  language  in 


a)  Opus  mi^as  (1266.)  ed.  Sum.  Jebb,  Lond.  1783.  f.  comp.  Samnil.  merkw.  Lebensbescbrr.  Ilal. 
1757.  ToL  IV.  p.  61CS8. 

fc)  C<nnp.  Diintifi  Epp.  c  notis  ed.  C.  Wittf^  Patar.  Id27.  BautngnrUn-CruaivM  de  Dantid  doe- 
trina  tlieul.  (Opp.  p.  827.hs.)  Osanam,  Dante  ct  la  pbil.  cath.  an  18  si6c1e.  Par.  1889.  M&nat  1S4i 
L.  n.  Arndt,  de  Dante  hcritporc  Ghibcllina  Bon.  1S40.  Schrr.  of  Schlo9Mr,  ISW  u.  ISSa  Witte, 
1S31.  Blanc  in  d.  Encjkl.  vol.  XXIII.  Philaletheii  (John,  Duke  of  SaxonyX  1S89s0l  Of^M, 
ArUiud,'i^A2.  F.  X.  TT^v'/',  Dante's  Leben  il  Werko,  kullurgesch.  Jena.  1S02.  [ScM^tl^lWsLot 
Lit  New  York.  1S44.  //.  SUhhingn,  Lives  of  the  Ital.  Poet^.  Lond.  1S88.  8  Tola.  8.  C.  £alb^  Ufa 
and  Timea  of  Dante,  f^oin  tbe  Ital.  by  Bunhury^  Lond.  1S51. 2  vola.  8.] 


CHAP.  IV.    ECCLES.  LIT.    $  281.  HUMANISTS.  327 

which  they  were  written  had  become  qnite  destroyed.    Petrarch  (d.  1874) 
was  the  first  who  turned  with  a  congenial  spirit  to  the  ancient  authors,  and 
even  if  his  imitations  be  regarded  as  unsuccessful,  ho  was  certainly  trained 
by  them  until  he  became  a  general  spokesman  in  the  aflUirs  of  Italy,  and  of 
the  human  heart,  (c)    Jhccaccio  (d.  1875)  labored  in  the  same  field,  and 
brought  back  to  Western  Europe  the  gods  of  ancient  Greece.    He  was  pub- 
licly appointed  to  expound  the  writings  of  Dante,  wrote  the  first  polished 
prose  in  the  language  of  the  people,  and  was  allowed  to  exercise  his  wit  at 
the  expense  of  the  monks,  of  good  morals,  and  probably  also  of  Christianity 
itself.  (f()    A  knowledge  of  Grecian  antiquity  had  been  introduced,  especially 
after  the  Synod  of  Florence  (1439),  by  large  numbers  of  Greeks,  who  as 
deputies  or  fugitives  became  scattered  in  all  parts  of  Italy.    These  were  gen- 
erally persons  of  only  moderate  talents,  but  they  brought  with  them  the 
ioheritance  which  a  refined  antiquity  had  bequeathed  to  them  in  living  tra- 
ditions, and  they  were  therefore  received  in  the  halls  of  the  Medici  and  of 
the  Vatican  as  if  they  had  been  apostles.    The  wealth  which  had  been  pre- 
served at  home  was  now  also  brought  to  light,  the  convents  opened  their 
graves,  and  the  resurrection  of  classical  antiquity  was  now  regarded  as  a 
national  aflSiiir  by  the  whole  of  Italy,  and  as  a  solemn  festival  in  honor  of  the 
great  ancestral  world,  whose  fragments  were  recognized  not  only  under  the 
rabbish  of  centuries  and  the  ashes  of  Vesuvius,  but  even  in  the  customs  and 
dispositions  of  the  people.    To  study  these  sacred  relics  of  heathenism,  the 
youth  of  the  Western  world,  with  the  Germans  and  Hungarians  in  the  van, 
now  went  on  pilgrimages  across  the  Alps  (after  1450).    The  influence  of  this 
ujioa  theological  studies  may  be  observed  in  the  life  of  the  Roman  LanrentivH 
Valla  (d.  1457),  who  first  developed  the  laws  of  a  true  Latinity,  and  was 
induced  by  the  artistic  refinement  which  it  produced,  decidedly  to  pronounce 
the  scholastic  style  absurd,  by  the  philological  knowledge  it  afforded  to  ex- 
plain and  illustrate  the  original  text  of  the  New  Testament,  and  by  the  his- 
torical criticism  it  fostered- to  give  jutlgraent  against  the  fables  of  the  hier- 
archy, (e)    Tlie  monks  whom  he  derided  invoked  against  him  the  power  of 
tbe  inqui/ition,  but  his  fame  was  too  great  and  he  wa*<  too  highly  esteemed 
by  the  nobility  of  Italy  to  be  reached  by  that  court,  and  he  was  silenced  only 
by  papal  confidence  and  favors.     In  fact  the  paj)al  court  was  by  no  means 
displeased  with  these  efibrts,  the  serious  consequences  of  which  it  did  not 
anticipate.     The  bishops  beyond  the  Alps  knew  but  little  about  them,  and 
Scholasticism  could  no  longer  present  to  them  any  considerable  resistance. 
Tlie  mendicant  friars,  who  were  attacked  with  the  greatest  severity,  and 
^bose  ignorance  rendered  them  the  most  susj)icious,  were  the  only  class 
vbich,  e8{)ecially  in  Germany,  were  bold  enough  to  accuse  the  new  literary 


«)  Africa  Epistolae  (0pp.  Baa.  1554. 15S1.  Lupd  1601.  2  vols,  f.)  Sonnettl.  CanzonU  Trionfl.— r. 
F.F4mme^  Franc.  Petr.  Lpi.  1S18.  [T.  Campbel/,  IMe  of  P.  Lon«l.  2  vol.-*.  WolUiHton,  Life  of  P. 
^'WwL  fr,)m  the  ItaL  I»nd.  Svo.    Mrtt.  Dohnon^  Lifo  of  P.  from  the  French.  Phllad  1S17.  8.] 

<0  De  i^ncalogta  Deer.  1.  XV.  Bas.  1532.  t  Decanicronc.  [Decam.  transl.  in  £ogl.  4.  voK  I'J. 
iMxLlSil] 

0  Ekmtntianim  laUnao  linsrnao  1.  VL  Dialectico  1.  III.  AnnotL  In  N.  T.  (ed.  Era^mu*,  Par. 
^r.  rrp.  JieriuM,  Amst  1631.)  De  ementiU  Constaiitini  donationo.  (0pp.  Bas.  15^10.  1548.  £)— 
^>t  Gericbt  XL  L.  Valla.  {J*aulm,  Beitr.  z.  K.  u.  Bef.  Ge«ch.  Brcm.  Ib37.  p.  815».) 


328  MEDIAEVAL  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  IV.    A.  D.  121«-1517. 

xmproYements  of  heresy  on  account  of  their  heathenish  and  schismatical  ori- 
gin. The  Ghibelline  party  in  Italy  was  distinguished  for  the  interest  which 
in  various  ways  it  showed  in  pagan  antiquity.  The  new  school  of  PeripU' 
Utic^  in  opposition  to  the  scholastic  Aristotle,  declared  that  the  theory  of 
the  universe  maintained  hy  the  ancient  Greeks  was,  to  say  the  least,  a  philo- 
sophical truth,  and  Pomponaao  (d.  1526),  like  a  modem  Prometheus,  ven- 
tured openly  to  declare  his  conviction  that  the  immortality  of  the  soul  was 
according  to  philosophical  principles  more  than  doubtful,  although  it  might 
be  conceded  as  a  theological  truth  to  a  Church  which  could  not  dispense 
with  it.  (/)  The  Platonic  Academy^  in  the  gardens  of  the  Medici,  defended 
only  a  few  of  the  religious  ideas  peculiar  to  Christianity,  {g)  There  w^as  a 
kind  of  superstition  which  in  some  places  made  a  boast  of  its  attacliment  to 
heathenism,  and  the  language  of  the  Holy  Spirit  which  had  been  used  in  the 
ancient  Church,  was  now  exchanged  for  some  delicate  flourishes  of  a  pagan 
Latinity.  (A)  Infidelity  and  superstition  were  arrayed  boldly  and  distinctly 
in  opposition  to  each  other.  In  Germany,  it  is  true,  the  deposition  to  en- 
gage in  classical  studies  originated  in  the  school  of  Thomas  a  Kempis,  and  in 
general  it  preserved  the  Christian  seriousness  of  this  source.  (?)  But  from 
the  very  nature  of  the  new  studies,  those  qualities  of  the  mind  vhich  have 
most  to  do  with  the  world  obtained  the  ascendency  in  the  hearts  of  such  as 
were  devoted  to  them,  and  the  common  j)eople  seized  upon  them  as  though 
they  constituted  a  general  education  of  the  whole  individual  man  (Humanis- 
mus).  The  consequence  was  that  a  meutal  revolution  wns  commenced, 
which  in  its  essential  character  was  properly  named  a  restoration  of  the 
Sciences.  At  the  same  time  the  great  ocean  which  surrounded  the  world 
was  crossed,  and  a  heaven  began  to  rise  before  them,  in  which  the  earth, 
hitherto  regarded  as  an  immovable  emi)ire  in  the  centre,  modestly  assumed 
its  proper  position.  {I')  Now  also  Machiatelli  (d.  1530)  revived  the  ancient 
doctrine,  that  while  religion  was  of  vast  importance  for  its  salutary  influence 
upon  the  state,  the  highest  political  objects  might  nevertheless  be  attained 
without  the  aid  of  the  Church  or  of  Christianity,  (l)  Thus  was  formed  inde- 
pendently of  the  hierarchy  an  intellectual  power  which  had  detected  the  cor- 
ruptions of  the  Church,  and  had  lost  a  sincere  faith  in  its  assumption  that  no 
one  could  be  saved  except  by  its  oflices.  Through  the  discovery  and  preva- 
lence of  the  art  of  printing  (about  1440),  which  was  almost  equivalent  to  a 
new  gift  of  tongues,  this  power  became  absolutely  indestructible  and  irre- 
sistible. 


/)  Petri  Pomponatii  L.  de  immortAlitate  anlmac  Bon.  1516.— Cone.  Later,  a.  1513.  {FTarduin 
vol.  IX.  p.  17198.) 

g)  Botcoe,  Lorenzo  do  Mcdicl.  [Lond.  184«.  1  v.  In  Bobn's  Stand.  Lib.  and  Pbllad.  8  v.  8.) 
Sietfking,  Oeach.  de  Plat  Aca«l.  zu  Flor.  Oott  1S12. 

A)  In  PauU  IL  Vita  Platlna,  p.  665s.  Canrusius  p.  738.  Quiriniu  p.  9m.  Erawni  I  XXVL 
Ep.  ^L—Walchil  Hist  crit  I-At.  linguae  a  12.  n.  8.  RiyU  under  Bembo.  IIenk4  on  ViUera.  p^ 
469SBL    Piper,  Mythol.  d.  cbr.  Kunst  vol.  I.  p.  279sa.    [Ranke^  IlisL  of  the  Popes,  vol.  L  p.  T2*.] 

€)  Meinert  vol.  II.  SOSss.  after  Revil  Davontria  illustrata.  Lugd.  1651.  4. 

k)  G.  L.  SehuUA,  Astroaomia  per  Copernicum  instaurata  religionis  et  pietatis  cbr.  p«r.  Lnth.  re- 
purgatae  egregia  a^jutrix.  Budis^  1S30. 

/)  DlscoRii  sopra  la  prima  Dec  di  T.  Llvlo.  II.  Principe.  Storia  Fiorentina.— ^SbAloM^r  In  hfe 
Zeitschr.  f.  Oe«h.  n.  Lit  vol.  Y.  p.  48588.  {MachiaveUCt  Hist  of  Flor.  the  Prlnoe  and  other  worki, 
transl.  into  Engl  in  Bubn's  Sund  Lib.  Lond.  1S47.] 


CHAP.  IT.    ECCLES.  LIT.    $  2SS.  REUCHLIN.  329 

I  282.    John  Benehlin.    1455-1522. 

J.  B.  3faiu»f  VIU  BeachL  DurlacI  16S7.    MHners  vol.  I.  pt  4498.    E.  Th.  Mayerhof,  Reneb.  n. 
%.  ZAi.  BrL  1S80.    Erhard  toI  II.  [K  UTss.    [Barham^  Reachlln^s  Lifo  and  Times.  Lend.  12ma] 

Reuchlin  (Capnio),  who  Lad  been  educated  in  the  study  of  the  Classics, 
tnd  was  a  leader  of  the  Ilumanists,  came  originally  from  Pforzheim.    At 
first  he  devoted  himself  to  the  study  of  Jewish  literature,  expecting  to  find 
die  mysterious  wisdom  which  had  been  promised  there.    Though  disap- 
pointed in  this,  he  obtained  a  knowledge  of  Hebrew,  which  he  succeeded  in 
diffusing  throagfa  the  Church,  and  applied  to  the  exposition  of  the  Old  Tes- 
tament, (a)    From  a  scientific  spirit  as  well  as  from  private  inclination  he 
disapproved  of  the  proposition  urged  by  Pfefferkom^  a  converted  Jew,  to 
oommit  all  the  Rabbinical  books  to  the  flames,  at  least  so  far  as  they  did  not 
Uupheme  Christ.    Tliis  was  construed  by  the  inquisitor  Ilogstraten^  who 
th«n  preidded  over  the  Dominicans  at  Cologne,  as  evidence  that  he  was 
neretly  a  convert  to  Judaism.    In  the  eyes  of  such  a  man  the  Greek  language 
was  the  mother  of  all  heresies,  and  the  study  of  Hebrew  was  an  unquestionable 
tpoBtisy  to  Judaism.    Standing  in  the  independent  position  of  an  advocate  of 
princes  and  cities,  Reuchlin  assailed  the  theological  barbarism  of  the  Domini- 
cans with  every  kind  of  intellectual  weapons,  to  which  the  inquisitorial 
Judges  had  nothing  to  oppose  but  cries  for  his  condemnation.  {!))    The  whole 
German  people  were  witnesses  of  this  ecclesiastical  feud,  and  a  learned  class 
of  spirited  youth  under  the  banner  of  Ulrich  of  Iluiten^  openly  declared 
themselves  on  the  side  of  Reuchlin.    From  the  circle  thus  formed  proceeded 
the  Letters  of  Ohtcure  Men^  (e)  in  which  the  extreme  stupidity  of  the  mendi- 
cant friars,  their  general  immorality,  and  their  loud  outcries  respecting  the 
heresies  of  the  Humanists,  together  with  their  own  dog-Latin,  is  described  so 
Mturally  and  truthfully  that  the  Dominicans  themselves  joined  in  circulat- 
ing the  book,  though  they  afterwards  hurled  their  anathemas  against  it  in 
▼ain.    The  controversy  was  at  last  brought  before  the  pope  himself,  and  de- 
cided in  favor  of  Reuchlin.    The  Dominicans  made  every  eflTort  to  obtain  a 
wversal  of  this  decision,  and  the  papal  court  was  not  altogether  indifferent 
to  the  threatenings  and  briberies  they  made  use  of,  but  on  the  other  hand, 
Rencblin  was  sustained  by  the  whole  influence  of  the  emperor  and  the  em- 
pire.   The  party  at  Cologne  were  finally  compelled  by  the  sword  of  Francis 
^  Sichingen  to  defray  the  expenses  of  the  suit  (1520).    Tlie  amount  of 
^l«se  was  only  a  hundred  and  eleven  gold-florins,  but  the  mendicant  friars 
^epe  themselves  overwhelmed  with  ridicule,  their  cause  was  utterly  ruined 
^  the  estimation  of  intelligent  persons,  and  Gdfmany  had  now  proclaimed 
to  the  world  where  she  would  stand  in  the  decisive  struggle  which  was  ap- 
Ptt)ichiDg. 


«)  Da  verbo  mirifico  I  III.  Tub.  1514.  t  De  arte  cabbalisUca  I.  III.  Hag.  1517.  f.— I>e  radimen- 
^^.  Phorrae.  150«.  t  Baa.  1578.  t  De  accenUbus  ot  orthogr.  linguae  hebr.  Hag.  1518.  fl-Epp. 
"^  WU  1519.  4. 

")  B.  Katiiwh.  ob  man  den  Juden  alle  Ibre  R&cher  ncbmen  nnd  verbrcnnon  soil.  1510.  P/ffferk, 
^^"PtcfeL  1511.  R.  Augensplegol.  1511.  Defenslo  Balaroniatorea  c.  Colonienses.  1518.  beaidea  other 
•^**e.  li.  Hardt,  Hbt  Liter.  Ref.  P.  If. 

*)  EpH  obacuromm  virorum.  1.  I.  Ilagen.  1616,  I.  II.  Basi  1517.  and  often,  den.  od.  Hotermund^ 
'"^  IttT.  S  Th.  edit,  and  expL  by  M&noh,  Lpx.  1827.— r.  ab  UutUn^  Triuinpbua  Capnioo.  15ia 


330  MEDIAEVAL  ClIUECH  HISTORY.    PER.  IV.    A.  D.  121ft-lMT. 

§  283.     Dmderim  Erasmus,    1465-1536. 

Opp.  cd.  Cleiicut,  Lnptl.  ITOSaa.  11  vols.  f.  Coinp.  Vitae  Erasmi  by  himself  In  Cleric.  voL  L 
J.  U  CUrc\  Wbl.  cliolMe,  vol  V.  p.  \9^*».  vol  VI.  p.  Tw.  Jortir^  Lift)  of  E.  Lond.  175&>.  Burtgny^ 
Vlo  d'R  Tar.  1757.  UcbtTS.  v.  Rtick  m.  Zus.  v.  Ileuke  Hal.  u.  Ulm.  17S2.  2  vola.  (Heaa)  E.  r.  Rottrrd. 
Zur.  179rt.  2  voK  Afl.  MulUr,  Leb.  d.  E.  v.  R,  limb.  1829.  coinp.  Ullmann  in  d.  Stud.  u.  KilL  IS29. 
II.  1.    [^«^//r,  Life  of  E.  Lond.  8va    Z>'^»<Wflrn^,  Hist  of  Ret  vol  L  p.  llSas.] 

Among  those  engaged  in  promoting  the  literary  improvement  of  this 
period  no  one  was  more  prominent  than  Erawnvs  of  Rotterdam.  He  was 
tlio  offspring  of  a  faithful  coimection,  but  one  which  never  received  the  sanc- 
tion of  a  Church  fettered  by  monastic  prejudices.  He  was  for  some  time  a 
pupil  of  the  Brethren  of  the  Common  Life  at  Deventer,  and  afterwards  a 
monk  at  Stein  (1486).  When  he  lacked  courage  to  refuse  the  monastic  vows 
he  was  released  from  them  (about  1490)  by  the  Bishop  of  Cambray,  who  was 
anxious  to  turn  his  classical  education  to  a  better  account.  Several  years 
were  then  spent  in  journeys  for  literary  purposes  in  France,  England,  and 
Italy,  until  he  became  settled  with  his  publisher  at  Basle  (1521).  When  a 
young  man,  and  devoted  to  literary  pursuits,  he  lived  in  a  state  of  depend- 
ence upon  the  capricious  favor  of  his  English  patrons,  and  at  a  later  period 
when  reigning  supreme  in  the  learned  world  he  refused  with  a  lofty  conscious- 
ness of  his  jwwer,  every  office  of  dignity  both  in  the  Church  and  in  the  courts 
of  princes.  But  as  he  was  of  a  feeble  constitution,  fond  of  ease,  and  as  he 
enjoyed  with  a  high  relish  the  elegancies  of  life,  he  was  always  delighted  with 
costly  presents  and  pensions.  He  displayed  an  astonishing  activity  in  the  dis- 
cussion of  the  various  subjects  then  brought  forward  in  ecclesiastical  and 
sociid  life,  sometimes  for  his  own  pleasure  and  sometimes  in  compliance  with 
the  wisiies  of  his  patrons.  Many  classical  authors  and  ecclesiastical  fathers 
were  edited  by  him,  but  above  all,  the  originid  text  of  the  New  Testament 
was  made  accessible  to  the  public,  and  the  immense  benefits  of  the  press  were 
then  realized  principally  by  his  agency,  (a)  His  character  was  not  of  the 
highest  order,  for  he  was  easily  excited  and  suspicious,  and  he  was  dostitnt^  of 
inventive  power  or  depth  of  thought;  but  his  common  sense  was  of  the  most 
solid  nature,  his  stores  of  knowledge  were  abundant,  he  was  never  at  a  loss 
for  the  happiest  turn  of  expression,  and  his  wit  was  inexhaustible.  The  in- 
sipid practices  of  the  monks,  the  subtle  refinements  of  the  scholastics,  the 
weak  points  of  the  worship  of  the  saints,  the  extravagances  of  those  who 
preached  indulgences,  and  the  follies  of  every  class,  even  of  the  popes  them- 
selves, were  all  unmercifully  ridiculed  in  his  writings.  Nor  did  he  hesitate 
to  throw  suspicion  upon  tHe  foundation  on  which  the  whole  fabric  of  the 
hierarchy  rested,  and  to  refer  to  Socrates  as  a  saint,  although  he  reproved  the 
heathenish  tendencies  of  the  modern  Ciceronians,  and  always  appeared  ar- 
dently attached  to  the  Christianity  of  the  sacred  Scriptures,  (h)  He  was  not 
backward  to  attack  the  interests  of  many  classes,  and  when  excited  or  exer- 
cising his  wit  he  was  frequently  bolder  than  circumstances  required.     It  was 


a)  G^Iloquia  Ciccronlanusi.  Ada^a.  Moriao  enconiiam.  Encblr.  niilltls  chr.  Ratio  verae  TImuL 
Matriinunii  ohr.  instiiutio.  £cclc>iti.sto.s.  Epp.  etc  [Ills  Panegyric  upon  Folly  has  been  XnxuX.  and 
publ.  in  Oxf.  \(m.  12.  and  Iiis  Familiar  Colloquies  tranisL  by  Bailey,  and  publ  in  Load.  1725.  &] 

h)  J.  A.  FahricU  E.xora  de  rel.  Er.  (Opu»c.  hist  crit.  lit  p.  879a&) 


CHAP.  IV.    KCCLES.  LIT.    1 283.  EKASMU3.    $  2S4.  SpEIPTUUES.  331 

therefore  not  surprising  that  nearly  every  kind  of  heresy  was  imputed  to  him. 
The  common  people,  however,  were  not  the  object  of  his  efforts,  neither  did 
he  aim  to  effect  any  very  violent  changes  in  society.  Even  to  those  who  were 
enlightened  ho  only  ventured  to  hint  at  truth,  he  never  objected  to  an  in- 
trenchment  of  himself  behind  ambignou?*  ex[)ressions,  and  on  all  subjects  pro- 
fessed his  readiness  to  submit  to  the  judgment  of  the  Church  should  it  even 
teach  the  doctrines  of  Arianism  and  Pelagianism.  It  was,  therefore,  no  very 
ditficalt  matter  for  such  a  man,  eminently  intellectual  and  distinguished 
among  his  contemporaries,  to  keep  up  a  tolerably  good  understanding  with 
the  principal  men  of  the  hierarcliy,  whose  education  was  accomplished  and 
secular.  By  all  those  who  filled  the  i>apal  chair  during  his  life  he  was  es- 
pecially esteemed. 

§  284.     The  Holy  Scriptures, 

In  matters  of  faith  an  indefinite  kind  of  authoritv  was  everv  where  con- 
ceded  to  distinguished  writers  among  the  ecclesiastical  fathers,  the  Scholas- 
tics and  the  Mystics.     In  the  controversy  with  the  Hussites  the  principal 
obje<'t  was  to  prove  that  the  authority  of  the  Scriptures  was  dependent  upon 
that  of  the  Church,  but  all  those  who  contended  for  reform  in  the  Church 
itself,  directed  their  attention  to  the  word  of  God.     During  the  thirteenth 
and  fourteenth  centuries,  considerable  interest  was  taken  in  a  tedious  kind  of 
Scriptural  exposition,  much  like  the  allegorical  and  devotional  method  of  an 
earlier  j period,  according  to  which  each  passage  had  various  senses.     Few, 
however,  ventured  to  go  beyond  the  authority  of  the  Vulgate,  of  Ilierony- 
mus,  and  of  Augustine.    Individuals  indeed,  like  Thomas,  though  ignorant 
of  the  original  languages,  and  full  of  preconceived  opinions,  nevertheless 
under  the  guidance  of  a  congenial  spirit,  sometimes  penetrated  deeply  into 
the  meaning  of  the  Scri[)tures.  (a)     Some  assistance  in  an  intelligent  expo- 
ation  and  criticism  was  also  derived  from  the  works  of  Jews  and  heathen 
writers.    Xlcolis  of  Lf/ra  (d.  1351),  a  Minorite,  investigated  the  literal  mean- 
ing of  the  Old  Testament  with  no  small  amount  of  Rabbinical  learning,  (b) 
The  first  printed  edition  of  the  Hebrew  Bible  was  published  under  the  care 
of  the  Rabbins,  and  was  conformed  to  their  critical  traditions  (Ma.sora).  (<•) 
XimeMii  (after  1505)  in  the  possession  of  unbounded  means  and  opportunities, 
^t  up  an  edition  of  the  Bible  in  jdl  the  sacred  languages,  but  the  original 
text  Was  based  upon  recent  maimscripts,  and  was  corrected  by  the  Vulgate,  (ii) 
Tbe  New  Testament  had  already  been  ])laced  in  the  hands  of  thousands  by 
^^6  Libors  of  Erasmus.  (^)     Valla  was  desirous  of  teaching  the  Latin  Vul- 
^e,  but  Erasmus  i)ointed  out  its  errors,  and  endeavored  to  make  the  simple 
''^^niiigof  the  words  of  the  New  Testament  intelligible  to  his  readers,  and 

^>   '^.  Thduck,  de  Thoina  Aqtiinatc  atque  Abaol.  interprctibiis  N.  T.  Ual.  1S12.  4. 
^)    ^Vtstillae  porpotuae  in  univ  Biblitk  Kotn.  UTl.  5  vols.  4  otlen. 
c)  S*fcncinL  1  .Ss.  f.  RrU.  1494.  Ai  oacn. 

'    iiiblit  hebr.  ciiald.  frr.  et  L»t  do  niandat)  Fr.  Ximene*  de  Citneron,    In  Coiiiplutcnid  Unly. 
**^*"''-  Th.  «.  t    Not  publicly  until  1520,  an«l  beyond  the  Pyrenees  In  Xh'll.    Comp.  U^/tU  (p.  294.) 
^  ^*'*^     [BarreiU  Life  of  Ximenea.  Lond.  8.] 

«)  K«v.  In.*lniin.  Ban.  1516.  f.    With  continual  improvitnents  1519.  1522.  15iT.  1535.    Ilenke  x.  d. 
"•  ^•'^Iten  Q.  il.  N.  T.  Anii.  lu.  Burigny  vol.  IL  pu  583as. 


332  MKDIAEVAL  CIirRCH  UISTORT.    PER.  IV.    A.  D.  1216-1S17. 

althongh  be  was  in  possession  of  only  a  few  mannscripts,  he  availed  himself 
of  the  labors  of  the  Greek  excgetical  writers.  With  a  bolder  criticism  Fdbsr 
(Lefcvre  d'Etaples,  d.  1537)  broke  throngh  the  custom  of  relying  upon  tho 
Vulgate,  and  although  he  fled  before  his  enemies  when  threatened  with  mar- 
tyrdom, he  prepared  the  way  for  the  triumph  of  the  gospel  in  France,  (y) 
Bonaventura's  Bible  for  the  poor  proposed  that  the  favorite  object  of  all 
preaching  should  be  the  contents  of  the  Scriptures.  (^)  The  opposition  of  tho' 
Church  to  ])rimitive  Christianity  was  evinced  in  the  fact  that  when  it  per- 
ceived the  almost  universal  use  of  the  sacred  writings  by  parties  hostile  to  it, 
the  hierarchy  ventured  more  and  more  decidedly  to  prevent  the  perusal  of 
the  Scriptures  in  the  language  of  the  people,  and  to  subject  every  translation 
to  an  ecclesiastical  censorship.  (A)  In  spite  of  all  their  efforts,  however,  after 
the  middle  of  the  fifteenth  century,  the  wishes  of  the  people  and  the  power 
of  the  press  prevailed,  and  fourteen  editions  of  a  translation  in  the  High  Ger- 
man, all  founded  upon  the  Vulgate,  though  none  were  in  the  genuine  lan- 
guage of  the  people,  are  evidence  of  the  extent  to  which  it  was  used,  (t) 

§  286.     The  Doctrine  of  the  Church, 

The  introduction  of  genuine  Christianity  had  all  the  effect  of  bringing  for- 
ward a  new  law.  The  doctrine  of  the  Church  made  no  further  progress  than 
that  which  sprung  from  an  attempt  to  justify,  in  the  view  of  literary  men, 
the  corruption  of  ecclesiastical  morals  by  indulgences,  and  an  outward  for- 
mality (§  270).  From  this  proceeded  the  doctrine  that,  without  regard  to  tho 
spirit  with  which  an  ecclesiastical  observance  was  performed,  it  possessed  a 
certain  degree  of  moral  value,  and  that  man  might  be  forgiven  by  his  God  on 
account  of  liis  own  works  or  of  indulgences.  It  was,  however,  argued  that  this 
reconciliation  with  God  was  primarily  founded  upon  the  original  atonement  by 
Christ,  {a)  The  Scholastics  made  justification  before  God  a  consequence  of 
love  or  of  the  faith  which  is  quickened  by  love  (fides  formata).  A  few  Mys- 
tics made  it  the  consequence  of  faith  alone.  In  a  limited  sense  only  can  it  be 
said  that  the  7^omMf«  stood  on  the  same  ground  as  Augustine,  for  while  they 
regarded  original  sin  as  a  culpable  offence,  and  divine  grace  as  predestination, 
thoy  nevertheless  looked  upon  the  former  as  consistent  with  the  possession  ol 
some  remnants  of  power,  by  which  a  man  can  render  himself  worthy  of  the 
divine  favor  (meritum  e  congruo),  and  the  latter  as  dependent  upon  the 
divine  foreknowledge.  The  Scottists^  on  the  other  hand,  described  both  origi- 
nal sin  and  grace  rather  as  the  invaiiable  condition  of  all  men,  and  as  de- 


/)  INalterium  Quincaplcx.  Par.  1309.  In  £pp.  Taali.  Tar.  1512.  In  IV.  Evv.  Meld.  1A23.  Frandi 
Biltlc  after  1528,  complote  at  Antw.  1530.  t.—Ch,  If.  Or<^f^  Ewai  rar  la  rio  ct  les  Merita  de  J.  Lcf^nv 
d'Et  StntHb.  1S42.    K.  U.  Grt^,  J.  P.  Stapulens.  [Zoltach.  f.  liist  Th.  1S32.  H.  la.] 

g)  Hiblin  paiipcrum,  I*rae<licatoriba8  i>erutili<>.  1590.  4.  Jb  often. 

;0  Innoi'.  in.  I.  II.  Ep.  141.  Cone.  ToloM.  a.  1229.  c  14  {JftnH  Th.  XXIII.  p.  197.)  [IjandotC* 
Manual,  Toulouse  a.  1229.  c.  U.]—UM^il  Hist  contror.  de  So.  et  SacrU  vernaeulia.  Lond.  1090  4 
Ileg^lmaUr.GiffcXi.  •!.  Bibelverbot*.  Ulm.  17S8. 

0  Fir»t  edit,  was  tliat  of  Mentz,  \Wi.— Panzer.,  lit.  Nachr.  r.  d.  aller&lt  gedr.  deat  Bibela. 
Nlirnb.  1774.  n.  Gescli.  d.  r'un.  kath.  dent  Bibel.  NQrnb.  1781.    J,  Kehrein,  z.  Oetch.  d.  deutMben. 
BIbolueberR.  vor.  Luth.  Stutt;;.  l^M. 

o)  DaUaeuM^  de  poenla  et  Bati5flictt  bnm.  Amat  1649.    [IFagifnbaeh  Illat  of  Doetrineii  §  196L] 


CHAP.  IV.    ECCLES.  LIT.    §  285.  DOCTRINE.    §286.  CASUISTRY.  333 

relopments  of  the  spiritual  world  in  the  course  of  Providence.  The  Pelagian 
tendency  was  essential  to  a  Church  which  placed  works  by  the  side  of  grace, 
and  taught  that  our  own  merits  may  exceed  the  demands  of  duty.  The  pro- 
fonnd  Thomist  Thomas  de  Bradwardina^  a  Professor  at  Oxford,  and  finally 
an  Archbishop  of  Canterbury  (d,  1849),  summoned  the  whole  generation  in 
which  he  lived  before  the  bar  of  God,  to  answer  for  its  adoption  of  Pelagian 
lentiments.  His  philosophical  system  was  founded  upon  the  principle  that 
God  is  the  necessary  cause  of  every  event,  and  man  only  his  shadow.  (5)  Tliis 
manner  of  speaking  was  so  foreign  to  the  prevalent  mode  of  thought,  and 
the  delusion  with  regard  to  the  opinions  of  Augustine  was  so  general  and 
indispensable  to  the  times,  that  it  awakened  as  little  favor  as  it  did  oppo- 
nUon.  (c)  It  is,  indeed,  not  improbable  that  when  men  happened  to  be  ar- 
raigned under  some  peculiarly  unfavorable  circumstances,  even  trifling  depar- 
tures from  the  ordinary  opinions  of  the  Church,  were  condemned  by  the 
tribunals,  but  certainly  a  great  variety  of  opinions  were  freely  tolerated, 
particularly  with  respect  to  anthropological  doctrines  and  in  literary  discus- 
sions. The  popes  were  far  from  possessing  either  the  ability  or  inclination  to 
pronounce  any  decision  with  respect  to  those  controversies  of  the  schools  in 
which  great  parties  were  arrayed  against  each  other.  The  Church  seemed  to 
be  90  indifferent  respecting  all  subjects  not  connected  with  its  own  usages 
and  privileges,  that  it  was  commonly  said  that  it  would  be  safer  to  impeach 
the  absolute  authority  of  God  than  that  of  the  pope. 

§  286.     Ethics  and  Casuistry. 

Dt  WetU,  chr.  Sittenl.  BrL  1S21.  vol.  II.  II.  2.  p.  116aa.  and  Leiirb.  d.  chr.  Sittcnl  BerL  1838.  p. 
ItSoL  Stdudlin^  Oesch.  d.  moralph.  Han.  1S22.  p.  466as.  <Sc  Gesch.  d  Sittonl  Jesa.  Qutt  1823.  vol.  IV. 
^ttSaa. 

Ethics  now  became  properly  a  science.  Ahelard  had  already  presented 
tbe  principal  points  of  a  regular  moral  system  (§  220),  in  which  his  dislike  to 
amerely  external  ecclesiastical  sanctity  and  penance?,  is  made  especially  promi- 
nent. According  to  him  sin  is  not  an  outward  act,  nor  a  thought,  nor  a 
natnral  desire,  but  a  consent  to  that  which  we  tliink  we  are  bound  to  refuse 
from  a  regard  to  the  divine  will.  We  truly  repent  only  when  the  pain  we 
endure  springs  from  love  to  God.  Other  methods  by  which  we  attempt  to 
make  satisfaction  for  sin  are  merely  means  of  discipline.  Those  scholastics 
^bo  came  after  him  generally  connected  their  ethical  system  with  their  the- 
^ogy,  without  however,  on  that  account,  assigning  to  it  an  inferior  position. 
'^omoi  was  most  successful  in  rendering  the  usages  of  the  Church  consistent 
^th  the  purity  of  Christian  morals,  {a)  According  to  him  the  ultimate  ob- 
i**  of  ethics  is  to  attain  a  likeness  to  God  by  means  of  the  Church,  the  con- 
tcmpUtive  life  is  more  exalted  than  the  active,  and  monks  and  prelates  are 
m^spensable  to  a  perfect  state  of  society.  Like  Aristotle  before  him  he 
^*^>cribes  Prudence,  Justice,  Courage  and  Temperance  as  the  cardinal  virtues, 

*)  iHcaiua  Del  adv.  Pel.  L  III.  ed.  SavUitUL  Lond.  16ia  t 

c)  ^rgentri  toL  L  p.  328s&    With  great  probability  Qietieler  cites  on  tbla  subject  also  Raynald 

')  Bommt,  seeondae  Partis  prima  et  secunda. 


334  MEDIAEVAL  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  IV.    A.  D.  121ft-151T. 

and  following  Augnstino  he  roproscnts  the  virtues  peculiar  to  Christianity 
consisting  in  faith,  hope,  and  love.  In  contrast  with  these  stand  the  seven 
deadly  sins,  with  pride  the  mother  of  them  all.  The  etiiical  system  of  the 
Mystics  was  confined  to  the  delineation  of  the  means  and  degrees  by  which 
the  creature  can  die  to  self  and  awake  to  the  life  of  God.  Through  the 
influence  of  the  Humanists,  sprung  up  in  contrast  with  the  conventional 
morality  of  the  Church  and  of  the  knights,  the  idea  of  a  purely  human  ethics 
which  di 111' red  from  the  law  of  Christ  only  in  name,  and  had  been  already 
hinted  at  in  Thomasin  r/rN^r*  Italian  Guest  (121  Gs.).  According  to  this, 
constancy  of  mind  is  the  basis  of  all  virtues,  and  inconstancy  the  basis  of  all 
vices,  God  is  not  a  Judge  who  can  be  induced  by  money  to  make  wrong 
exchaufro  places  with  right,  good  men  will  bo  happy  whether  in  ontward 
prosperity  or  adversity,  wickedness  renders  those  who  commit  it  miserable, 
the  will  alone  gives  character  to  every  action,  and  Gwl  always  loves  the  vir- 
tuous, {h)  When  this  scholastic  method  of  treating  the  subjects  of  faith  and 
law  was  applied  to  ethics,  a  science  of  Casuistry  w^as  fonned,  for  those  espe- 
cially who  had  the  care  of  souls,  and  to  take  the  place  of  the  old  penitential 
books,  (r)  In  thi><  theory  of  cases  of  conscience,  the  conflict  between  daties 
and  the  ambiguities  of  particular  circumstances  were  either  invented  with  the 
most  artful  ingenuity,  or  taken  from  actual  life.  When  it  was  received  as  a 
real  counsellor  in  the  path  of  life,  the  rock  of  conscience  was  still  shaken  by 
it.  The  moral  judgment  of  the  Church  itself  appeared  to  waver.  When  in 
the  Council  of  Constance  the  Franciscan,  Jean  Pefit^  was  solemnly  accused 
by  France  of  having  defended  the  Duke  of  Burgimdy  for  his  assassination  of 
the  Duke  of  Orleans,  on  the  ground  that  the  latter  was  a  tyrant  and  a 
traitor,  and  the  Dominican,  John  von  Faklenburf/^  was  charged  by  Poland 
with  lijivirjg  [)reached  in  behalf  of  the  German  orders,  that  the  Polish  king 
and  nation  should  be  expelled  and  massacred,  the  only  result  which  could  be 
obtained  by  idl  the  eloquence  of  Gerson  was  a  general  disapprobation  of  the 
assassination  of  tyrants,  while  the  i)articnlar  crime  complained  of  and  its 
defenders  rem;iine<l  unrebuked,  and  Martin  V.  refused  his  assent  to  the  con- 
demnation of  Falckenburg.  Political  considerations  and  bribery  were  doubt- 
less concerned  in  this  result,  but  tlie  hesitancy  of  the  Church  allowed  the 
mendicant  friars  to  j)lace  the  sentiment  under  the  protection  of  their  doc- 
trine of  probabilities,  that  any  one  was  jnstiflable  in  punishing  by  his  sword 
all  those  who  were  beyond  the  ordinary  reach  of  justice,  {(l) 


h)  Dcr  WalRche  (Jast  d.  Thomasin  v.  ZIrklaria,  <h1.  with  phlL  A  hiaL  obas.  by  If.  RHckevt,  Qaed- 
Unb.  1852. 

c)  In  the  thirteenth  century,  Suinma  Kaymandiana,  by  lUym.  do  Pcnnaforte;  in  the  fourt^^nth, 
A8te5ana.  by  Astosanus,  Rartholina  ».  Pi^anc•Ila, by  Bartbol.  do  9.  CVmconlia,  in  Pisa;  in  the  fift««oth, 
Angelica,  by  Angelus  de  Clava;<io,  and  others. 

d)  Germn  Opp.  vol.  V.  II.  P.  II.  p.  8S6aa.  Ilardt,  Const  Cone,  vol  IV.  p.  439stiw  15M.  tHugo—l 
Hist  PoU  Fret  1711.  f.  1.  XI.  p.  870. 


CHAP.  V.    EXTEN3.  OF  THE  CHURCH.    $  2ST.  APOLOGISTS.  333 

CHAP,  v.— EXTENSION  OF  THE  ROMAN  OAXnOLIO  CnUROH. 

§  287.    Apologetics,    Islam,    Jttdaum, 

The  literary  defences  of  Christianity  wore  principally  directed  against 
eome  objections  nrged  by  Mussulmen  and  Jews,  but  they  merely  justified  the 
views  of  Christians  at  the  bar  of  their  own  judgments.     Thomas  of  Aquino 
gave  utterance  to  the  rigid  views  of  the  Church  when  he  maintained  that 
she  is  the  only  judge  of  reason  and  the  only  gate  of  salvatiori.  (a)    The  Pla- 
tonist,  Marsilins  Fieinus  (d.  1499),  maintained  the  view  adopted  by  the  Hu- 
manists, according  to  which  God  had  revealed  himself  also  to  the  heathen, 
but  had  never  become  a  perfect  man  except  in  Christ,  (h)    Mussulmen  were 
prohibited,  under  the  penalty  of  death,  from  even  listening  to  Christians. 
Baymond  Lnllus^  of  Majorca  (1236-1316),  who  had  been  startled  from  the 
poetic  dreams  of  a  gay  youth  by  the  image  of  a  suffering  Christ,  attempted 
to  overcome  the  power  of  Islam  on  the  one  hand  by  establishing  institutions 
for  philological  missions,  and  on  the  other  by  his  new  art  of  reasoning,  which 
he  supposed  was  able  to  conquer  any  mind.     With  restless  activity  he  pro- 
dumed  his  fanciful  doctrine  of  combination  to  Christians,  and  a  Triune  God 
to  the  Saracens,  and  finally  suffered  the  martyrdom  which  he  had  long  sought 
bot  feared.    The  Church  long  hesitated  whether  he  should  be  regarded  as  a 
saint  or  as  a  heretic,  {c)     It  was  not  until  the  Cross  had  become  victorious 
in  Spain  that  many  Moors  and  Jews  were  induced  by  the  alternative  of  death, 
or  banishment  from  their  native  soil,  to  receive  baptism  from  their  conquer- 
ors.   In  that  country,  especially,  Judaism  became  pervaded  by  the  literature 
of  the  Middle  Ages,  and  exceeded  even  the  learning  of  the  times.    Maimo- 
nides  (d.  1208),  by  combining  the  doctrines  of  Moses  with  those  of  Aristotle, 
gave  new  life  to  Hebraism,  and  yet  with  warm  alFection  preserved  collected 
traditions,  (d)    So  decided  was  the  ecclesiastical  prejudice  against  loans  of 
money  on  interest  on  the  ground  that  it  was  usury,  that  nearly  all  the  i)ecu- 
niary  wealth  of  Christendom  in  each  generation  fell  into  the  hands  of  the 
Jews,  at  that  time  scattered  in  every  country  of  Europe.    It  was,  however, 
as  speedily  lost  by  them  in  consequence  of  the  extreme  oppressions  and  vio- 
lence to  which  they  were  universally  subjected.     Wherever  a  protracted 
profit  from  them  was  regarded  as  more  advantageous  than  a  sudden  robbery, 
tbey  were   protected  by  the  princes  like  any  other  lucrative  poascssions. 
liany  laws  were  passed  and  frequently  renewed  by  the  Church,  to  i)revent 
•11  dependence  of  Christians  upon  Jews,  to  destroy  all  bonds  of  affection  be- 
tween Jews  and  Christians,  to  forbid  the  employment  of  Jewish  physicians, 
wd  to  nullify  all  mortgages  held  by  Jews  upon  sacred  utensils,  and  the  pro- 
perty of  the  Church.    Even  (Gregory  I.  regarded  it  as  unquestionably  proper 


A)  Bumma  csthoL  fldei  contra  Qf>ntiIe^  I.  IV. 

^)  De  rel.  chr.  et  fidel  pletatc  ad  Laurent  Me<l.  (Opp.  Par.  1641.  C  vol  I.) 

^)  H.  LuUi  Opp.  qua«  ad  Inventam  ab  \pw  artem  univcr:»1ein  pertinent,  C  Jord.  Brani  ct  C. 
^P*in»e  commtr.  Argent  169S.  Act*  SS.  Jan.  vol.  V.  p.  6888s. 

^  JJVclally  More  Neboohim,  Baa.  1629.  4.  Ber.  1791.  nebcra.  v.  Scheyer,  Frkf.  1880.  [J.  Tlnm- 
*'^>  K^tfona  of  the  Laws  of  Mooes  ftt>ni  the  More  Neb.  of  Malm,  with  note^  Ac.  Lond.  1S28.  Lit- 
^«  Mag.  Yol  L  pL  2888S.  5458a.}    Beer.  Lebon  o.  Wirken  d.  Moeea  ben  Maimon.  Prag.  1S85. 


\ 


336  MEDIAEVAL  CnUBCH  niSTOBT.    PEE.  IT.    A.  D.  1116-1517. 

to  entice  Jews  into  the  profession  of  Christianity,  were  it  only  for  the  sake 
of  their  children,  and  frequently  arraDgcments  were  made  for  compolling 
Jews  to  listen  to  discourses  for  their  conversion.  All,  however,  conceded 
that  they  should  never  be  compelled  to  profess  the  Christian  faith,  and  the 
popes  excommunicated  those  who  attempted  to  injure  these  living  witnesses 
for  the  truth  of  the  Christian  faith,  in  the  enjoyment  of  their  usual  privi- 
leges and  discipline,  on  the  ground  that  at  some  period  before  the  second 
coming  of  our  Lord  they  were  to  be  converted  to  Christianity,  (e)  But  the 
exclusive  influence  of  ecclesiastical  prejudices,  the  wealth  of  the  Jews,  and 
the  necessities  of  those  indebted  to  them,  continually  nourished  the  popular 
hatred.  The  commencement  of  the  crusades  was  remarkable  for  scenes  of 
Jewish  slaughter,  and  not  unfroquently  afterwards  the  feelings  of  the  popu- 
lace were  so  aroused  against  this  people  by  vague  rumors  of  the  crucifixion 
of  Christian  children,  of  poisoned  wells,  and  of  the  piercing  of  the  Host, 
that  in  some  cities  the  whole  Jewish  population  were  suddenly  massacred  or 
burned  at  the  stake.  Excluded  as  they  were  from  public  stations  of  honor 
and  ci\joynieuT,  they  applied  all  their  energies  and  keen  intellects  with  almost 
convulsive  eagerness  to  the  accumulation  of  money,  by  which  alone  they 
could  possess  influence.  In  silent  bitterness  toward  the  whole  human  race, 
but  faithful  to  their  principles  even  to  death,  this  reprobate  people  of  God 
by  hundreds  gave  themselves  and  their  children  to  the  slaughter  rather  than 
to  baptism.  (/) 

§  288.    Prussia,     Lithuania.     Lapland. 

LiU>r.  see  S  211.  Jfone^  Synib.  n.  Mythol.  vol.  I.  p.  l^s^—DlugoHsi  Hist  Pol  I  X.  p.  96a.  /. 
lAndenhUitt,  Jabrbb.  e<lit.  by  Voigt,  Kunigsb.  1S28.  p.  608s.  2»XsA,—Sch^eri  Lapponta.  Frcfl  1671 
4.    Mone^  vol.  I.  p.  21sfi. 

The  bishops  who,  since  the  tenth  century,  had  been  consecrated  to  carry 
the  gospel  to  Prussia,  found  nothing  but  death  there.  The  Polish  Cistercians, 
after  1207,  appear  to  have  been  more  successful.  But  when  the  converts 
were  used  by  Polish  princes  in  the  subjugation  of  the  Prussians,  they  were 
all  murdered,  and  the  Polish  provinces  on  the  border  were  reduced  to  deso- 
lation. In  this  extremity  the  order  of  the  German  knights  was  invited  to 
assist  the  distressed  Poles  (122G),  and  by  a  league  between  it  and  Poland,  the 
empire,  and  the  Roman  court,  Prussia  became  its  perpetual  possession. 
These  knights  then  proclaimed  a  crusade  against  their  enemies,  ai.d  after 
long  and  bloody  wars  they  effected  the  conquest  of  the  inhabitants  (1230-83). 
Innocent  IV.  divided  Prussia  into  the  dioceses  of  Culm,  Pomesania,  Erm- 
land,  and  Samland.  The  bishops  wore  to  have  possession  of  a  third  part  of 
all  the  land  as  an  independent  property,  but  they  soon  became  dependent 
upon  the  knightly  order,  by  which  a  refractory  bishop  of  Samland  was 
allowed  to  starve  in  prison,  (a)    Every  foot  of  territory  conquered  by  the 


e)  Alexand.  III.  In  Cone  Later,  a.  1179.  c.  26.  Jnnoc.  IlL  I.  IL  Ep.  803.  Comp.  Bemardi  Ep. 
822.     Thomm,  Suuinia.  P.  II,  2.  Qa.  la 

/)  JoH,  Oesch.  d.  I^r.  vol  VL  VII.  &  AUgr.  0«ech.  d.  Isr.  Yolka.  vol  IL  p.  SlYTaft.  [./off «  Iltet  of 
the  JcwB,  Ac.  transl.  from  Qerm.  by  J.  II.  Hopkins,  New  York.  1&13.  MUmatCt  Hist  <^  Jewt.  New 
York.  ISSO.]  Depping,  les  Jalfii  dans  le  moyuu  &gt,  Psr.  1S9U.  Looherer^  QMbL  der  t.  d.  Klrche  fiir  a. 
wider  die  Jaden  hervorgesangonen  Verordnn.  (Jahrb.  f.  TbeoL  n,  chr.  FUL  188&  toL  IY.  H.  8.) 

a)  Oeib»er,  Oesch.  d.  Domk.  za  KSnigsb.  Kuoigsb^  1880.  p.  iOim, 


CHAP.  V.    EXTENa  OP  THE  CHURCH.    $  28».  PRUS&IA.    LITIIUANIA.        337 

order  was  secared  by  permanent  cities  colonized  by  Germans,  so  that  nlti- 
mately  the  Prussians  were  more  properly  exterminated  than  oonverted.    In 
the  beginning  of  the  fourteenth  century  the  Grand  Master  made  the  city  of 
Marienhurg  his  permanent  capital,  and  there  were  put  forth  the  most  splen- 
did exhibitions  of  knighthood,  (h)     Soon,  however,  dissensions  arose  be- 
tween the  order  and  the  hierarchy,  the  people  whom  they  governed  were 
driven  to  despair,  one  portion  of  the  country  was  wrested  from  them  by  the 
King  of  Poland,  and  the  remainder  was  received  from  him  as  a  royal  fief 
(^1466). — Jagello^  the  Grand  Duke  of  Lithuania,  purchased  the  band  of  the 
heiress-apparent  to  the  throne  of  Poland  by  submitting  to  baptism  (1886). 
His  countrymen  received  each  a  white  woollen  coat  as  a  sponsor^s  gift,  and 
allowed  themselves  to  be  baptized  in  troops,  all  in  each  company  receiving 
the  same  name.    But  even  in  the  sixteenth  century  heathenish  customs  main- 
tained their  place  side  by  side  with  Christian  usages. — The  sovereignty  of 
Sweden  was  acknowledged  by  the  Laplanders  (about  1279),  and  a  church 
was  consecrated  for  them  at  Tornea  (1385)  by  Hemming^  the  Archbishop  of 
Upeala.    After  this,  children  were  generally  baptized,  and  marriage  was  cele- 
brated by  the  priests,  but  the  natural  poverty  of  the  country  ai.  J  tlie  sepa- 
ration of  the  families  was  so  great,  that  a  pastoral  charge  seemed  almost 
impossible,  and  the  minds  of  the  people  were  subject  to  the  magical  rites  of 
their  former  heathenism,  {c) 

§  289.     Prester  John  and  the  Mongols, 

Ataemani  BibL  or.  vol.  III.  P.  L  II.  Moskeim^  Ilist  Tartaroruin  ecc.  Hlmst  1741.  4  Abel- 
AfiRtiMt,  Mtoioires  sur  les  relations  poUtiqacs  des  princes  chrdtiens  avec  lefl  eTn]>ereurs  Mongols. 
(Mm  de  riost  de  France,  Acad,  des  Inscript  1822.  Th.  VL  VII.)  Schmidt,  Hist  des  MongoU 
<Irpab  Tscbinguiz-khan  Jusqu'il  Timur-lenk.  Par.  1S24.  [HisL  of  the  Mongols  from  Ohcnghis-Khan 
loTun^rUne.  Amst  1858.  4  vols.] 

Near  the  commencement  of  the  eleventh  century  the  Nestorians  induced 
a  Tartarian  prince  to  profess  Christianity,  who  transmitted  to  his  successors 
the  name  (Ung-Khan)  which  has  been  rather  doubtf^iUy  translated  into  Euro- 
pean languages  in  the  form  of  Prenter  John,    In  the  popular  traditions  of 
lus  own  age  he  was  a  mythical  personage,  in  which  Europe  admired  an  ideal 
sorpasdng  the  papacy  itself  in  its  union  of  the  royal  and  sacerdotal  power. 
A  royal  priest  of  such  an  illustrious  character,  Alexander  III,  was  very 
•nxions  to  connect  with  the  Roman  Church.'"    Ilis  glory,  however,  was  soon 
lost  in  the  confusion  created  by  the  conquests  of  GhenghisKhan,     Europe 
itfldf  was  delivered  about  the  same  time  (1241)  from  the  perils  of  the  great 
national  migration  of  the  Mongols,  not  so  much  by  the  hand  of  man  as  by 
^  power  of  God.    Mendicant  friars  were  sent  to  these  conquerors  of  Asia 
^1  the  Roman  Church  and  St.  Louis  of  France.    Brilliant  hopes  had  been 
awakened  by  the  personal  favors  shown  to  individuals,  the  regard  which  a 
^Qering  people  usually  entertain  for  the  deities  of  the  nation  they  wish 
to  rabdoe,  and  the  actual  hesitation  which  Mongolian  Deism  exhibited  in 
^'^'^^g  between  the  gospel  and  the  koran.    The  exaggerated  accounts  sent 

h)  J.  Voifft,  Oeech.  Marienb.  Kdnigsb.  1824. 

e)  Comp.  BheimcaUTi  Rep.  1841.  roL  XXXIII.  p.  82m, 

•  Barontue,  ad  ann.  1177.  M.  SSaa. 

22 


338  MEDIAEVAL  CHUECH  HISTORY.    PER.  IV.    A.  D.  1216-1511. 

back  by  tho  missionaries  there,  filled  all  Europe  with  the  most  exalted  ex- 
pectations. Even  in  the  thirteenth  centnry,  however,  the  papacy  of  the 
Dalai-lama  began  to  be  developed,  and  other  Mongolian  tribes  embraced  the 
religion  of  Islam.  One  small  congregation  in  the  city  of  Peking^  over  which 
an  archbishop  had  been  consecrated  by  Clement  V.  (1807),  was  entirely  de- 
stroyed during  an  insurrection  in  China  against  the  Mongols  (1869).  The 
Xestorians  alone  sncceeded  in  preserving  a  few  settlements  there. 

§  290.     The  Kevo  World. 

Bitrth.  de  las  Casat,  Relaeion  de  1a  destraiMon  de  las  IndiM.  1551  4  QaL  1614  germ.  1665.  4)— 
Robertson,  Hist  of  America.  Lond.  1772.  and  often.  [New  York.  184a]  Weise^  &.  Las  Ca&  (Zelt- 
sdir.  t  hlsL  Th.  vol  IV.  Bt  1.)  Walten'a  Weltk.  1885.  vol.  L  p.  87s8.  [  W.  Irving,  Life  and  Voyages 
of  Columbus  and  bis  Companions,  new  ed.  New  York.  1848.  8  toIs.] 

In  Spite  of  the  ecclesiastical  prejudices  he  was  obliged  to  overcome,  Co- 
lumbus believed  himself  called  by  the  Holy  Spirit  to  fulfil  the  word  of  the 
Lord,  predicting  that  the  gospel  should  be  carried  to  nations  at  the  utmost 
borders  of  the  earth.  The  discovery  of  America  (1492)  and  the  circumnavi- 
gation of  Africa  (1498)  were  regarded  as  mighty  conquests  in  behalf  of 
Christianity.  The  Indians,  however,  had  no  desire  for  a  heaven  where  they 
were  again  to  meet  their  Spanish  tyrants.  In  every  way  that  European  vio- 
lence could  devise,  they  were  forcibly  compelled  to  receive  baptism.  And 
yet  the  blessings  the  gospel  ever  carries  in  its  train  could  not  be  altogether 
withheld  from  them.  The  Dominicans  exerted  all  the  power  of  the  Church 
to  secure  for  their  converts  the  rights  of  human  beings.  Finally  the  heroic 
sufierer  Las  Coms  (1517)  obtained  a  law  from  Charles  I.  (V.)  secnring  to  the 
natives  the  ei\joyment  of  their  personal  freedom,  but  it  was  pm*chased  by 
the  introduction  of  the  African  slave-trade. 


CHAP.  VI.— OPPOSITION  AND  REFORM. 

Liter,  before  %  228.  Flacius,  CaUl  testlum  veritatK  (Bas.  1556.  Arg.  1562.  C)  Vrtt,  1666.  Fascia 
rerum  expetendarum  ac  ftigiend.  cd.  Orihuinus  Oratlus,  CoL  1585.  t  aux.  R.  Brown,  Lond.  S  vola,  t 
Jo.  Wolf,  Lcctlunes  memorab.  et  recond.  (Laving.  1600.)  Lp&  1671.  Hardt:  Const  Cone.  toI.  L  P. 
IX.  nist  lit  KeC  P.  IIL  C.  UUnuinn,  Beformatoren  vor  d.  Reformation.  Ilamb.  lS41a.  8  rdik 
F.  A.  Uolzha'uaen,  d.  Protest  nach  solner  Entsteh.  Lpz.  1846.  vol  L 

§  291.     General  View. 

The  highest  forms  of  the  ecclesiastical  system  then  prevalent  bad  their 
origin  in  enthusiastic  notions  and  feelings,  inconsistent  with  nature,  (a)  Bot 
as  all  enthifeiasm  must  in  the  course  of  time  expend  its  force,  and  natoro 
will  ultimately  assert  its  rights,  the  extreme  self-denials  which  that  system 
had  undertaken  and  required,  soon  became  a  false  display,  for  which  some 
indemnified  themselves  by  unlawful  and  unnatural  means,  and  others  became 
a  prey  to  idiocy  or  despair  through  their  compulsory  fidelity.  Hence,  so 
long  as  Catholicism  was  looked  upon  as  the  only  possible  form  of  tbe  Churchy 
there  were  either  perpetual  corruptions  of  all  ecclesiastical  institutions, 

a)  Comp.  Hegd^VW.  d.  Bel.  Brl.  1888.  vol.  L  pu  171m. 


CSAP.  YL    OPPOS.  A  BEFORlf.    $  S^  BTEDINOEBS  339 

oontiBoal  renovations  of  the  spirit,  which  either  gave  new  life  to  the  old 
forma,  or  created  new.    But  the  true  mission  of  Catholicism  in  Europe  was 
now  nearly  complete,  the  people  began  to  think  that  they  had  passed  the 
period  of  pupilage,  and  those  who  were  employed  in  political  and  scientific 
porsnits  were  evidently  saperior  to  the  hierarchy.    The  internal  spirit  which 
called  for  such  a  system  no  longer  existed,  its  abuses  had  attained  a  high 
degree  of  extravagance,  and  finally  a  painful  schism  had  become  perceptible 
in  every  part  of  the  Ohurch.    The  necessity  of  a  reformation  was  therefore 
generally  acknowledged.    Many  felt  that  it  waa  near,  and  expressed  their 
eonvicUons  by  predicting  sometimes  the  destruction  and  sometimes  the  glo- 
rious renovation  of  the  Ohurch.    Not  unfrequently  their  feelings  were  ex- 
hibited in  prophedes  that  God  was  about  to  raise  up  pious  doctors,  Christian 
heroes,  and  even  monks  or  hermits  for  this  work,  {b)    Two  classes  of  per- 
sons became  prominent  in  the  course  of  these  struggles  for  reform :   1)  The 
hostile  parties  continued  from  the  preceding  period,  whose  revolutionary  ele- 
ments were  soon  almost  completely  destroyed  by  the  Chnrch,  while  all  that 
WIS  true  in  them  passed  over  into  the  other  class.    2)  A  party  composed 
pertly  of  a  series  of  ecclesiastical  teachers  still  deeply  imbued  with  the  spirit 
ai  Catholidam,  and  anxious  to  bring  it  back  to  its  original  intention,  and  to 
reader  it  consistent  with  its  own  principles  and  laws,  and  partly  of  those 
who  despaired  of  any  general  reform  according  to  the  customary  forms  of 
lew,  and  who  therefore  commenced  the  work  in  their  own  way.    These, 
longing  for  a  primitive  Christianity  unknown  in  later  times,  had  no  scruples 
in  renouncing  all  terms  with  the  Church  of  that  day.    All  these  tendencies 
were  in  various  ways  intermingled  with  one  another,  inasmuch  as  the  Catho- 
lic and  the  Protestant  elements  were  as  yet  comprehended  in  each  other. 

I.  HosTHJE  Pasties. 

§  292.     Ths  Stedingen  and  the  Heretical  GhibelUnen. 

A  tribe  of  Frieslanders  in  the  district  of  Steding,  among  the  settlements 
on  the  Weser,  succeeded  in  maintaining  the  popular  freedom  which  origi- 
>udly  previuled  in  Germany.  The  castles  from  which  the  Count  of  Olden- 
l>vg  threatened  their  country  were  demolished,  the  tithes  which  the  Arch- 
l^p  of  Bremen  demanded  of  them  were  withheld,  and  the  curse  of 
exeommunication  which  the  latter  denounced  upon  them  was  disregarded, 
for  forty  years  the  count  and  the  bishops  contended  against  this  little  tribe, 
protected  only  by  the  courage  which  freedom  supplies,  and  their  country^s 
Borinee.  Their  heresy  consisted  not  in  the  adoration  of  a  toad,  as  was 
^o^rted  in  the  stopid  and  lying  accounts  sent  to  Rome,  but  in  something  far 
*ore  dangerous  to  the  peace  of  the  Church,  {n)  It  was  the  first  triumphant 
"^f^e  of  the  people  against  the  nobility  and  the  priesthood,  and  therefore 
*<oeeding1y  interesting  to  the  peasants,  who  every  where  gloried  in  it    Gre- 

^)  V2e(^  Trial  IV,  80.  ApoL  ConC  August  p.  27es.  Lacker,  ReC  Acti.  toL  L  p.  148tii 
^'^*^*^,  H.  eec  L  XV.  p.  418.  ITaffenbacK,  Oesch.  (L  Bcfl  toI.  L  p.  118.  AuguM^  die  BeC  Pro- 
V^i^  (B«itfr.  X.  Ocaeb.  o.  Stattot  d.  er.  K.  188&  voL  IIL  pu  IUm.) 

«)  MoMl  ToL  ZZIIL  p.  828.    Baynald,  ad  ann.  128a  N.  4SaL 


I 
I 

\ 


340  MEDIA^EYAL  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  IT.    A.  D.  191«-1517. 

gory  IX.  oansed  a  crnsade  to  be  proclaimed  against  the  Stedingers  as  here- 
ties  of  the  most  deadly  and  absnrd  character.  Their  great  and  glorious 
struggle  was  finaUy  terminated  by  a  dreadfol  battle  (1284),  which  only  a 
small  remnant  snrvived  to  sabmit  to  the  yoke  of  the  Chnrch.  {b) — ^During 
the  contest  between  the  popes  and  the  house  of  Hohenstanfen,  some  sectaries 
residing  in  the  Suabian  city  of  Hall  (about  1248)  declared  the  pope  a  heretic, 
and  that  the  clergy  had  forfeited  their  power  on  account  of  their  corruptions. 
They  therefore  offered  prayer  for  the  members  of  the  house  of  Hohenstanfen 
as  the  only  just  and  perfect  rulers.  When  the  power  of  these  princes  was 
broken  they  also  disappeared,  (c)  But  for  a  long  time  after  a  story  was  cur- 
rent in  various  forms  among  the  people,  according  to  which  Frederic  11. 
would  at  some  future  period  return,  or  fVom  his  blood  should  arise  a  mighty 
eagle  which  would  destroy  the  Roman  Church,  (d) 

§  298.     Fraternity  of  the  Free  Spirit, 

The  bold  aspiration  of  the  spirit  toward  God,  which  was  not  serionsly 
opposed  when  it  appeared  in  all  its  indistinctness  and  benignity  in  the  sys- 
tem of  Mysticism,  necessarily  fell  under  the  Judgment  of  the  ecclesiastieal 
courts  when  it  came  out  with  scholastic  definitions,  exalted  itself  above  the 
Church  itself,  and  was  even  perverted  to  the  gratification  of  wicked  pas- 
sions. A  synod  at  Paris  (1209)  pronounced  judgment  upon  the  schocd  of 
Amalric^  which  combined  the  Pantheistic  doctrines  of  Erigena  with  their 
own  principles  of  reform,  which  they  announced  in  the  style  of  the  abbot 
Joachim.  They  maintained  not  so  much  that  every  thing  was  one  and  God, 
as  that  God  is  the  essence,  the  end,  and  the  object  of  every  thing  created. 
Every  pious  person  is  a  Christ  in  whom  God  becomes  man,  the  resurrection 
is  regeneration,  heaven  and  hell  are  internal  and  moral  states,  the  body  of 
Christ  is  in  the  bread  even  before  its  consecration,  just  as  God  is  in  all  na- 
ture, and  the  Trinity  is  merely  the  incarnation  of  the  Deity  in  three  different 
periods  of  the  world.  After  them  and  among  them  the  age  of  the  Holy 
Spirit  was  to  commence,  when  there  would  be  no  more  need  of  an  external 
Church.  They  also  maintained  that  the  pope  was  Antichrist,  that  every 
thing  done  from  love  was  pure,  since  the  Spirit  who  reigns  in  the  hearts  of 
all  who  know  themselves  to  be  one  with  him  cannot  sin.  Amalrich  of  JBena 
was  himself  compelled  only  to  recant  his  assertion,  that  no  one  can  be  saved 
who  does  not  consider  himself  a  member  of  Christ's  body  (1204).  The  con- 
demnation of  persons  then  in  their  graves,  by  the  Synod  of  Paris,  and  the 
connection  of  the  proceedings  with  the  name  of  Erigena,  indicate  what  most 
have  been  the  panthebtic  object  of  that  assertion.  A  treatise  of  Datid  of 
Dinanto  was  at  the  same  time  destroyed,  which  wonld  seem  from  arguments 
urged  against  it  at  a  later  period,  to  have  founded  upon  certain  Aristotelian 


h)  Jo.  OUon^  CaUL  Episcc  Brem.  {Menkm  voL  IIL  p.  798.)    Oregor,  IX,  ad  Aivblcp.  Bran. 
{Lindmbroff,  p.  112.)— J.  D.  Sitter,  de  pago  Steding  et  de  Stedingla.  Tit  1751.  4  {Serg^  MoieaBk 

Dalsb.  YoL  L  P.  IL  p.  529.)    Scharlinff,  de  Stedingifl.  Hafh.  1828.    ScMo984r^  Wdtgvaeh.  toL  III 

Th.  S.  Abth.  S.  p.  127n. 

e)  Alberhu  Stadens,  ad  ann.  124a 

tf)  Jf<MAtf<m,  Yen.  e.  anpartb.  Ketzargosch.  mmat  1T48.  pw  SIShl    JTMUEmis  d.  Biffhliiatr  Kid. 

aenaga  (ZeltB«h.  t  thnrlng.  Oaaeh.  185&  H.  9.) 


CHAP.  YL    OPP0&  h  REFOBIL    |  29a.  FRATEKNITY  OF  THE  FBEE  SriKlT.    341 

conclusions  the  idea  that  the  Deity  could  have  no  distinctions  in  his  nature, 
and  that  from  him  proceeded  spirit  and  matter,  (a)  Soon  after  this  holocaust 
at  Paris,  a  popular  party  with  similar  principles  made  its  appearance  on  the 
Upper  Rhine,  and,  until  some  considerable  time  in  the  fourteenth  century,  in 
some  parts  of  France,  Germany,  and  Italy.  They  were  known  under  vari- 
ous local  appellations,  frequently  as  Beghards  and  Waldenses,  but  among 
themselTcs  they  were  generally  called  Brethren  and  Sisters  of  the  Free 
Spirit.  The  nature  of  their  principles  leads  to  the  conclusion  that  Uiey  had 
their  origin  in  the  scattered  fragments  of  Amalric's  school^  in  which  their 
dootrinee  had  been  advocated  in  a  systematic  form.  Their  principal  doc- 
trine, however,  does  not  seem  to  have  been  the  Pantheism  which  contains 
no  popular  elements,  but  an  opinion  which  they  made  prominent  in  all  their 
teachings,  according  to  which  it  is  the  Spirit  alone  that  makes  us  free  and 
happy,  (h)  From  this  they  inferred  that  all  outward  things  were  unprofita- 
Ue,  and  thus  adopted  a  sentiment  which  in  every  age  has  been  very  ambigu- 
ous in  its  application.  Some  found  access  to  God  by  breaking  loose  from 
lU  earthly  objecta,  but  others  gave  themselves  up  to  worldly  lusts,  on  the 
ground  that  the^e  could  have  no  influence  upon  the  mind,*  but  might,  on  the 
other  hand,  serve  to  extricate  the  feeling  of  original  unity  from  the  artificial 
distinctions  of  society,  by  abolishing  marriage  and  the  possession  of  private 
property.  (<•)  The  Picards  or  Adamites,  who  in  the  fifteenth  century  en- 
deavored to  introduce  among  the  Hussites  a  paradisiac  state  of  nature,  were 
diildren  of  the  same  spirit,  and  perhaps  were  externally  in  connection  with 
them.  Some  of  these  escaped  the  swords  of  the  Hussites,  and  preserved  a 
loerct  remnant  of  their  sect  in  Bohemia.  {*() 

§  294.     Order  of  the  Apostles. 

L  Hbt  Dalelnl  &  Addltaznentum  ad  Hist  Dulc  (Muratori  vol.  IX.  jk  4S8.) 

IL  Mutkeim,  Gctcb.  d.  Ap.  O.  (KetzcrgeKb.  p.  198.)  A,  de  Beglutrd.  p.  221aB.    &'hloitaer,  Ab&l.  u. 

DiUa.  OuUuk  1S07.    [L  MarioUi,  Fra  Dolcino,  An  Hbt  Memoir  of;  tnuisl.  Uom  tho  lUL  by  A. 

QdMga,  Luod.  1S52.  &] 

Gkcrardo  Stgarelli^  of  Parma,  a  youth  of  a  fanatical  disposition  who  had 
been  rejected  by  the  Franciscans,  felt  called  upon  to  invite  men  back  to  the 
trae  poverty  of  the  apostolic  life.  The  Order  of  the  Apostles,  which  he 
eoQeeted  (after  1260)  around  his  person,  went  about  with  their  spiritual  sis- 
Un  begging,  and  proclaiming  that  the  kingdom  of  God  was  near.  The  popes 
pnkilnted  (after  1286)  this  new  mendicant  order,  but  they  continued  to 
Mnmble  with  the  Catharists  and  Fratricelli,  and  awaited  the  approaching 
^owolill  of  the  papacy  according  to  the  imagery  of  the  Apocalypse.  Ghe- 
•ttdo  was  buried  in  Parma  (1800).    The  apostolical  brethren  were  then 


«)  Cooe.  Par.  AcU  In  Mariene^  Thes.  Anecd.  vol.  IV.  p.  16888t  Accounta  by  liigot-dus  ad  onn. 
^  «od  GwwHm  IleitUrbae.  V.  22.  In  Man^i  vol.  XXII.  p.  801m.  Gerwn.  de  concord!*  iiu'tu- 
(kncloglca.  (vol  IV.  p.  926.)—SnffflA4tr<ft,  A.  v.  Bena.  (Klltat.  Abb.  N.  a)  C  U.  Iluhn,  Am.  v. 
^(?<«d.iL  Krit  ISIfl.  H.  1.)    J.  If.  KronUin,  Am.  v.  B.  u.  David  v.  D.  (Stud.  u.  Krit  1S47.  11.  2.) 

^)'obD4,28iw  RoolS. 

«)  MotMm :  de  Beghardis  et  Bcgiiin.  p.  810.  255.  H.  ecc  vol.  II.  p.  652flL 

*)  CoQtemporary  acoonnto  In  Lennini,  Hist  de  la  guerre  dea  llaea.  vol  L  p.  79ss.  (Comp.  Btint- 
'^^Dtai  tor  lea  Adamltea  de  Bobi^me.  Jb,  vol.  II.  p.  SOlaa.)  Moskftm,  U.  eoc.  {i.  687a.  BrI.  K. 
l5.H 


342  MEDIASYAL  CHUBCH  HIBTOBT.    PBR.  IT.    A.  D.  121f-151T. 

induced  to  follow  Doleino,  a  native  of  Milan,  and  bis  spiritaal  friend  Marga- 
retta.  His  prophetic  circular  Letters  recognize  indeed  the  historical  neces- 
sity that  the  Ohnrch  should  pass  into  the  hands  of  the  wealthy  and  power- 
ful, but  maintain  that  since  the  hierarchy  had  left  their  first  love,  and 
surrendered  themselves  to  earthly  things,  it  was  now  needftil  to  retnm  to 
the  poverty  of  the  apostles.  His  assertions,  which  probably  attained  this 
distinct  form  only  by  degrees,*  were  merely  a  compilation  of  the  herenes 
which  had  prevailed  at  an  older  period  :  ^^  The  Roman  Church  is  the  great 
harlot  of  the  Apocalypse ;  all  the  popes  since  the  time  of  Sylvester,  with 
the  exception  of  Peter  de  Hurrhone,  have  been  false  leaders ;  it  is  better  to 
live  without  vows  than  with  them ;  men  and  women  may  oohabit  without 
distinction;  peijnry  is  lavrful  in  opposition  to  the  inquisition;  and  the 
power  of  the  Church  is  transferred  to  the  Order  of  the  Apostles,  in  whidi 
alone  salvation  can  be  found."  Believing  that  the  revolution  he  expected 
was  at  hand,  and  that  the  Staufian  imperial  dynasty  was  about  to  be  re- 
stored, Dolcino  took  up  arms  against  the  inquisition,  with  something  like  a 
thousand  men  went  forth  on  a  bold  predatory  expedition,  and  finally  in- 
trenched himself  dn  Mount  Zebello.  Here  he  was  surrounded  by  the  host  of 
the  crusaders  which  had  been  sent  against  him  by  the  Bishop  of  Yeroelli, 
and  at  last  sank  under  the  power  of  hunger  and  the  swords  of  his  ene- 
mies (1807). 

§  295.     Termination  of  the  Earlier  Sects. 

In  the  south  of  France,  after  many  fluctuations  of  fortune^  victory  be- 
came decided  in  favor  of  Cathohcism,  amid  fields  strewed  with  the  slain  and 
the  ashes  of  dwellings  (1228).  In  Italy  itself  the  Holy  Father  was  sur- 
rounded by  all  kinds  of  heretics.  The  Catharists  had  been  allowed  opportu- 
nity to  complete  a  regular  system  of  Church  polity,  and  in  Brescia  they  even 
ventured  to  destroy  some  Catholic  churches,  and  solemnly  to  excommunieate 
the  Roman  Church,  (a)  But  when  the  chief  of  the  Ghibelline  party  had 
fallen  (until  12G9),  they  sunk  under  the  power  of  the  inquisition,  and  in 
consequence  of  their  own  unfaithfulness.  In  Bosnia  alone  they  succeeded  in 
maintaining  their  ascendency,  until  the  measures  of  the  government  against 
them  (after  1442)  led  to  the  subversion  of  the  empire  by  the  Turks,  {h)  In 
Milan,  some  who  advanced  the  idea  that  a  female  hierarchy  ought  to  be 
formed  on  the  ruins  of  that  which  then  existed,  because  the  Holy  Spirit  had 
become  incarnate  in  a  woman,  were  obliged  to  atone  for  their  nahness  at 
the  stake,  (c)  The  Waldenses  were  reduced  in  numbers  because  they  bad 
been  burned  by  their  persecutors,  but  some  congregations  stiB  remained  in 
the  south  of  France  and  in  the  secluded  valleys  of  Piedmont.  The  Teaaons 
for  the  increase  of  heresy  were  declared  by  a  zealous  Catholio  to  be :  the 
vanity  and  the  zeal  of  heretics  of  every  condition  in  life  to  teadi  and  con- 
-  '  —  ' 

♦  Thte  to  BOfltained  by  the  milder  Tlew  in  the  ftecoants  discorered  by  BoQ^iUini  Dole.  •  i 
t»renL  Novam.  1888.    After  him :  .;:  Krone,  Fra  Dole  n.  d.  Patarener.  Lpi.  1844.    Qvm^  Oakm 
d.  Stad.  d.  ev.  Geistl.  W&rtemb.  1846.  vol.  XVIIL  U.  1. 

a)  Raynaid,  ad  ann.  1225.  N.  47. 

}>)  Raynaid,  ad  ann.  144&.  N.  28, 1449.  N.  9. 1450.  N.  1& 

c)  After  Palaeky  :  Pfchack^  d.  Bdbm.  Wilbelmlne.  (Zeltochr.  t  hM.  Tb.  1889.  H.  &) 


OHAP.  YL  OPPOS.  M  BEFOBU.  |  S98.  D*AILLY.  GEBSON.       343 

Tert  those  with  whom  they  were  coiiTersaiit  hj  means  of  the  Holy  Scrip- 
tares,  and  on  the  other  hand,  the  neglect  of  popular  instruction,  the  contempt 
for  the  Church  shown  hy  its  own  servants,  and  the  unapostolio  lives  of  the 
prelates,  {d)    After  the  thirteenth  century,  no  one  who  considered  merely  the 
worldliness  of  the  Church  and  the  multitude  and  zeal  of  the  heretics,  could 
have  any  doubt  whether  the  latter  or  the  Cathohcs  would  obtain  the  vic- 
tory.   In  the  commencement  of  the  fifteenth  century  heretical  congregations 
of  almost  every  kind  were  scattered  and  broken  up.    But  it  was  only  in 
secret  that  those  forms  of  opposition  were  maintained  or  organized  which  in 
the  sixteenth  century  came  forward  under  the  name  of  Anabaptism,  when 
•■ailing  the  constitution  of  the  Church,  and  of  Unitarianism  when  arrayed 
against  the  doctrines  of  the  Church,  (e)    The  victory,  however,  was  depend- 
ent partly  upon  the  hopes  which  might  be  entertained  of  a  reform  and  the 
disposition  of  the  liberal  party  then  powerful  in  the  Church  itself,  partly 
upon  the  lifeless  disposition  of  the  age,  which,  as  represented  by  the  Human- 
liti,  was  satisfied  with  a  shrewd  and  selfish  smile  at  existing  evils,  and  finally 
npoa  the  more  settled  condition  of  the  states  and  their  recdhciliation  with 
Rome.    A  victory  on  the  part  of  such  heretics,  as  most  of  those  were  who 
existed  at  that  period,  would  have  destroyed  for  ever  the  historical  develop- 
ment of  Christianity.    If,  therefore,  we  may  concede  that  the  Church  was 
rig^t  in  shrinking  from  no  calamities  or  laceration  of  feeling  (f)  to  overcome 
this  first  threatened  revolution,  the  very  relation  of  such  a  victory  to  Chris- 
tisDity  rendered  it  evident  that  at  some  future  time  an  entirely  different 
result  might  be  expected. 

II.  Reform. 

§  296.  Reformation  in  tJu  Head  and  Memben. 

When  the  Minorite,  Alcarus  Felagius  (about  1330),  poured  forth  his 

lamentations  over  the  low  condition  of  the  Church,  the  only  remedy  he 

Mm^t  was  the  re-ostablishment  of  the  papal  authority,  (a)    About  the  close 

of  the  same  century  public  opinion  became  decided  that  the  reformation  of 

the  head  of  the  Church  must  commence  with  a  limitation  of  its  power  to 

do  mischief.     In  the  fifteenth  century,  when  every  nation  and  class  in  society 

dem&nded  the  reformation  of  the  Church,  when  prelates  and  popes  united  in 

the  promise  that  it  should  be  given,  and  in  fact  proclaimed  that  it  was  already 

hegon  and  completed,  every  one  understood  this  iudotinite  term  to  mean  pri- 

ouuily  that  which  he  most  desired,  the  removal  of  what  seemed  to  him  most 

<)ppre8Bive  and  unchristian.    Reformation  was  generally  understood  to  mean : 

^  establishment  of  Christian  morals  among  all  classes,  and  especially  among 

the  clergy,  the  abolition  of  Roman  extortion,  and  the  restoration  of  all  cccle- 

*»tKal  institutions  to  their  original  design.    The  canon  law,  however,  was 

to  remain  untouched,  and  hence  its  meaning  was  indefinite.    Nothing  was 

^  Append,  to  BainsHi  Summa  &  ft.  (BibL  Max.  toL  XXY.  p.  S6&) 

^  /%ffS  Symbb.  ad  YlUm  et  doctr.  Laelii  800.  ill  P.  L  Lpa.  182A.  i.    Gehtm;  de  primordlij 
**^««».  iitg.  1880. 
/)  Uo,  MAlter.  toL  L  p.  0O9i. 
•)  hmukk  de  pkD«ta  Eoel.  Ulm.  1474 1  M  often. 


344  MEDIAEVAL  CHUBCH  HISTORY.    PES.  IT.    A.  D.  ISIMUT. 

eaid  respecting  doctrine.  In  consistency  with  this  view,  those  who  gaT9 
expression  to  puhlio  opinion,  especially  the  Parisian  divines,  represented  tLc 
reformation  as  essentially  connected  with  the  reconciliation  of  the  groat  schism. 
The  Bishop  of  Camhray,  Peter  d^Ailly  (d.  ahont  1425),  comhincd  all  tlie  efforts 
of  the  French  Chnrch  in  the  demand  of  a  general  connoil,  and  although  after 
the  experience  gained  at  Pisa,  he  had  doahts  whether  any  help  could  be  do- 
rived  from  sach  a  sonrce,  (6)  he  exerted  all  his  intellectual  energy  at  Con- 
stance to  have  one  summoned.  Gersan  also  defended  the  independence  of 
the  general  assemblies  of  the  Church,  as  the  only  medium  by  which  a  legal 
and  salutary  reform  could  be  effected,  but  maintained  that  the  only  way  in 
which  a  sound  state  of  heart  could  be  secured  was  by  the  study  of  the  Scrip- 
tures, and  a  better  education  of  the  people.  Accordingly,  toward  the  dose 
of  his  stormy  life,  he  commenced  the  reformation  among  the  children,  (e) 
Finally,  Nicolas  of  Clamengis  (d.  1440),  believing  that  the  time  had  come  in 
which  judgment  should  begin  at  the  house  of  God,  and  having  described  the 
corruption  of  the  Church  in  language  rhetorically  extravagant,  but  in  Roman 
Latin,  and  with  graphic  distinctness,  then  waited  for  the  exaltation  of  the 
Church  by  external  means,  whenever  she  should  humble  hers^,  and  amend 
her  ways,  {d)  Ilemmerlin^  a  canon  of  Zurich,  as  a  preacher  and  as  an  im- 
pressive author,  has  faithfully  represented  the  spirit  of  tlie  Council  of  Basle, 
but  his  aristocratic  hatred  of  the  Swiss  Confederacy  produced  his  removal 
from  public  life  to  the  prison  of  the  convent  of  Lucerne  (about  1457).  (e) 
Andreas,  Archbishop  of  Crain,  of  the  order  of  preachers,  in  his  wrath  against 
Sixtus  IV.  called,  on  his  own  authority,  a  general  council  at  Basle  (1482),  for 
the  deliverance  of  the  Church.  Although  the  old  City  of  Councils  ventnred 
to  endure  an  interdict  in  his  defence,  he  was,  on  the  pope's  requisition,  im- 
prisoned, and  when  he  found  himself  forsaken  by  all  on  whom  he  had  relied, 
he  hung  himself  on  the  railing  of  the  tower  (1484).  (/)  The  more  advanced 
champions  of  reform  in  the  great  councils  sometimes  inadvertently  wont  be- 
yond the  fundamental  principles  of  Catholicism.  D'Ailly  appealed  to  the 
opinion  of  the  ancient  fathers  in  proof  of  his  position  that  councils  might  err 
even  in  matters  of  faith,  and  Gerson  advanced  the  idea  of  a  universal  Church, 
which,  under  Christ  its  sole  head,  was  the  only  Church  in  which  salvation 
could  be  found,  was  without  error,  schism,  or  sin,  and  was  consequently  very 
different  from  that  of  Rome,  {g)  The  Mystics  believed  in  the  possibility  of  a 
Reformation  springing  from  within  the  Church  itself.  Those  in  particular 
who  were  called  the  "  Friends  of  God,"  and  who  professed  to  take  reftige 
under  the  cross  of  Christ,  and  depended  upon  visions  and  secret  leaders,  must 
have  occupied  a  position  quite  ambiguous  with  respect  to  the  Church,  and 
were  full  of  bitter  complaints  of  its  degeneracy,  (h)    The  saint  of  the  North 

h)  De  difflculUto  Befbnn.  in  Cona  nniv.  {ffardU  toL  I.  P.  VL  p.  855i) 

c)  Tr.  de  parvulis  trahendis  ad  CbrUtuui.  (0pp.  vol  IlL  p.  278.) 

d)  y.  de  damengU^  de  raina  EooL  about  1406.  ilTardt  voL  I.  P.  IIL  p^  l.>— ^d.  JfOn^  Kk.  de 
G6man{(ea,  sa  vie  et  sea  ^iit&  Straftb.  1846. 

6)  B,  Reber,  Felix  Hemmerlin,  ZQr.  1846.    Here  see  p.  \9u,  of  bis  writings. 

/)  Ptiter  Numagm,  OesU  Arcbicp.  Crayensis  (Wiroeb.  1514.)  in  lloUinger^  H.  aoe.  p^  XV.  ^ 
8478S.  Wurgtinen,  Basler  Chronik  VI,  14.^.^  BurckharJt,  Erzb.  A.  v.  Krain  a.  d.  leistA  OoocilsTir^ 
sacb  in  B.  Basel.  1852.       ff)  Uardt  toI.  II.  P.  V.  p.  190.  4c  toI.  I.  P.  V.  pi  6S. 

A)  Bulman  Mtrtwin  (d.  1882),  das  B.  t.  d.  neon  Felsen.  (oompi  a  SekmUU  to  d.  ZettMhr.  C  bis^ 


CHAP.  VL  OPPOS.  A(  BEFORM.  %  996.  ESASMU8.  CUSA.        345 

wlieD  flihe  visited  Rome  found  the  whole  Deoalogne  reduced  to  a  single  pre- 

0^  ^  Bring  money  I "  and  she  therefore  predicted  a  Reformation,  which 

should  proceed,  not  from  the  pope,  but  from  Christendom,  (t)    Gregory  of 

Heimbnrg  (d.  1472),  a  legal  counsellor,  even  when  excommunicated  and 

homeless,  remained  true  to  his  character,  and  with  German  stardiness  invoked 

the  German    national  spirit,  in  opposition  to  Roman  encroachments,  (k) 

Emmus  perceived  that  the  only  vocation  suited  to  his  character  was,  in  the 

qmet  leisure  of  a  literary  life,  to  effect  a  reformation  of  theology,  and  thus 

prepare  the  way  for  a  peaceful  reformation  of  the  Church,  by  promoting  a 

knowledge  of  classical  and  ecclesiastical  antiquity,  and  by  cultivating  tlio 

fiicdty  of  independent  and  sober  common  sense.    But  there  were  in  the  hier- 

srohy  prodigious  resources  for  evading  these  calls  for  a  Reformation,  and  for 

oomipting  those  leaders  in  it  who  could  not  be  overthrown.    All  the  bold 

ohampions  who  advocated  it  at  Basle  gradually  submitted.    Some  of  the  more 

cudouB  did  this  first,  and  all  could  do  so  with  dignity.    Nicolas  of  Cuia 

(d.  1464),  afterwards  Cardinal  and  Bishop  of  Brizen,  defended  the  supremacy 

of  ths  pope  at  the  bar  of  the  very  synod  for  whose  independence  he  had  just 

been  contending.    According  to  his  metaphysical  speculations  all  the  affairs 

of  Church  and  state  were  arranged  on  the  principle  of  a  unity  before  which 

no  opposition  could  be  true.    To  the  scholasticism  of  his  day  he  opposed  his 

Isimed  want  of  knowledge,  to  an  absolute  faith  in  the  Scriptures  he  opposed 

the  anthority  of  the  Holy  Spirit  who  had  been  given  to  men  and  had  cstab- 

hdied  the  Church  before  the  letter  of  the  sacred  writings  had  been  composed, 

and  to  such  as  disbelieved  the  miracles  of  the  Church  he  opposed  his  own 

diooteiestedness  as  a  legate  and  as  a  preacher  of  indulgences.    He,  however, 

preierved  in  his  heart  a  desire  for  a  Reformation,  and  predicted  that  the 

pqMcy  would  be  subverted  and  the  Church  renovated,  but  at  some  distant 

period.  (I)    At  the  commencement  of  the  sixteenth  century  every  thing 

•eoomplbhed  for  the  Charch  at  Constance  and  at  Basle  had  apparently  come 

to  nothing,  and  all  confidence  in  councils  was  given  up.    There  were  not 

wanting,  however,  even  among  the  friends  of  the  hierarchy,  some  individuals 

who  warned  them  of  the  consequences  of  this  course.    Cardinal  Julian  wrote 

to  the  pope  (1481),  ^^  If  all  hope  of  our  amendment  should  be  cut  off,  we  shall 

1m  attacked  by  the  laity  according  to  our  deserts."  (m)    Chancellor  Mayer  of 

Hentz  wrote  (1457)  to  Aeneas  Sylvius :  ^^  The  German  nation,  once  the  Queen 

of  the  world,  but  now  a  tributary  handmaid  of  the  Roman  Church,  begins  to 

veoie  herself  as  out  of  a  dream,  and  is  resolved  to  throw  off  the  yoke."  (n) 


^MMl  p.  i.  p.  sin.)    Plaintes  d'an  La  qae  allemand  sar  la  decadence  de  la  chrutiente  (18M.)  optu- 
«l>pabiU  pL  Ck.  Schmidt,  Strasb.  1840.  4  RohHch  d.  Qotteafr.  u.  Winkler  am  Oberrhein.  (Zeltacbr. 
' kht  Tb.  ISia  P.  1.)    C.  Schmidt,  Tauler,  p.  161aa. 
<)  ^ir^Uae  Eevelatt  in  Wo^i  Lectt  meinor.  vol.  II.  p.  CTOsa. 

^  AdmooiUo  de  liOostis  naarpatt  Paparum  Kom.  ad  Imperator.  Re^^  et  Prince,  cbr.  a.  Confbta- 
Oopttinatac  Papae.  (OoldaH^  Monarch.  8.  R.  Imp  vol.  1.  P.  &57mw)  &  oUien.  Comp.  Jlag^n  in  d. 
*«8t  Heldelb.  1S89.  voL  II.  p.  4140a.     VUmann,  Reformat  vol  L  p.  21288. 

0  Be  eatb.  eonooidanUa.    De  docta  ignorantia.  Apol.  doctae  Ignor.    De  Deo  absoondito.    De  oon> 
!•*•<»  Kpp  VIL  ad  Clomm  et  Literatos  Bobemiae,    Conjectnra  de  novi«8imi8  dieb.  (0pp.  Baa. 
^t  ToU  t)    r.  A.  Scharpf,  d.  Card.  N.  v.  C.  Mainz.  184a  vol  I.    J.  M.  IHix,  N.  v.  C.  fi.  d.  K. 
*  *rtt  BatbL  1847.  2  vols.    R,  Zimmsrmann,  Cua.  als  Vorlaufer  Leibnltiena.  Welm.  1852. 
»)Ac*«i«Ill8tGoocageo.CoL1681.  LIILp.82L       n)  Tra(/f<  Lectt  memor.  vol.  L  p.  868. 


346  MEDIAEVAL  OHUBGH  BISTORT.    PXB.  IT.    A.  D.  1916-1M7. 

A  literary  man  in  Germany  thonght  the  Reformation  equally  impracticable 
and  necessary  at  that  time,  (o) 

§  297.    John  de  Wyeliffe.    1824.— Dec.  81,  1884. 

I.  Writings  of  J.  WIcL  Lond.  1886.  IT.  Knyghton,  de  eventlbw  AnglUe  osqae  1895.  (7%9<Ml#iit 
Bcrr.  llisL  Aug.  Lond.  16d8.  t)    Arg^ntri  toL  L  P.  2.  pi  Ita. 

XL  J.  I^evU,  Hist  of  tlie  Ufo  it  8uffering8  of  J.  W.  (Lond.  1790.)  Ox£  1990.  Rob,  Faai^Aaii, 
Life  &,  Opinions  uf  J.  de  W.  Lond.  (1829.)  lS8i.  9  vola.  [new  ed.  Lond.  185&  4.  C.  W.  U  &/«.  lilb 
of  W.  New  Turk.  1S8S.  2  vols.  Llttcll*s  Kel.  Mag.  toL  III.  pi  Slss.  148m.]  De  Xuever  Oronemat^f 
Diatr.  in  J.  W.  viUm,  ingenium,  sciipta.  Trt^.  1887.  O.  Weber,  Qeech.  d.  akatb.  K.  a.  Seeten  la 
Grossbrit.  Lim.  1S45.  vul.  I.  Tb.  1.  E.  A.  Leward,  d.  theoL  Doctrln.  W.  (Zeitsch.  I  hist  Th.  1S4IL  H* 
2.  4  1847.  II.  2  )    G.  V.  LeokUr,  W.  a.  d.  LoIIarden.  L  {lb.  18S8i  H.  8.) 

The  papal  power  in  England  had  heen  renovated  by  means  of  the  mendi- 
cant friars.  In  the  time  of  Edward  III.  parliament  enacted  that  every  one 
who  should  be  the  bearer  of  any  papal  orders  with  respect  to  eccleaiastioal 
offices  should  be  imprisoned  (1850),  forbade  all  appeals  to  the  court  of  Rome 
(1853),  and  declared  that  all  rents  paid  to  the  pope  as  a  liege  lord  were  un- 
lawful (1366).  Wyeliffe  also  wrote  in  the  style  of  the  Abbot  Joachim 
respecting  the  last  times  of  the  Church,  (a)  Under  the  instruction  of  Brad- 
wardine  he  had  become  skilled  in  scholastic  learning,  and  in  both  branches 
of  the  law,  and  as  a  subordinate  member  of  the  University  of  Oxford  he  sop- 
ported  that  institution  by  his  learned  tracts  in  opposition  to  the  mendicant  fiiars 
(after  1360),  and  defended  the  government  in  its  endeavors  to  render  itself 
independent  of  the  French  papacy.  As  a  professor  of  theology  after  1872, 
and  much  respected  as  a  realistic  philosopher,  he  was  sent  as  one  of  the 
deputies  to  Bruges  (1874-76),  to  confer  with  the  papal  commissioners  respect- 
ing a  free  appointment  of  ecclesiastical  offices  by  the  Oburch.  He  afterwards 
spoke  and  wrote  against  the  oppression  of  the  Church  by  the  papacy,  against 
the  arbitrary  mode  of  excommunications  then  prevalent,  against  monasticism, 
purgatory,  and  against  the  necessity  of  auricular  confession,  indalgenoee,  and 
the  worship  of  saints  and  of  images.  Gregory  XI.  condemned  (1877)  nine- 
teen articles  selected  from  his  writings,  which  however  Wyeliffe,  under  the 
protection  of  the  court  and  the  high  nobility,  merely  explained  in  a  milder 
and  more  definite  sense.  But  when  he  longed  to  extricate  himself  from  the 
antichristianity  of  his  own  day,  and  enjoy  the  privileges  of  a  Church  like 
that  which  Paul  had  constructed,  and  therefore  taught  that  the  Scriptures 
alone  were  worthy  of  complete  confidence  (Dr.  Evangelicus),  that  the  tem- 
poral power  of  the  pope  was  derived  solely  from  the  emperor,  that  it  was 
treason  to  obstruct  appeals  from  the  spiritual  courts  to  the  king,  that  priests 
lost  all  spiritual  power  by  the  commission  of  mortal  sin,  that  tithes  and  other 
alms  should  be  withheld  from  priests  living  in  sin,  that  the  saving  grace  of 
God  was  not  connected  exclusively  with  the  priesthood  and  the  sacraments, 
and,  finally,  that  Christ  was  present  in  the  Lord^s  Supper  only  in  a  spiritual 
manner;  his  doctrines  were  condemned  at  the  £arthquake-Ck>unoil  at  London 
(1882),  and  Wyeliffe  himself  was  excluded  from  the  University.    He  was, 

o)  Life  of  the  celebrated  D.  CranUiL  Hamh.  (1722.)  1729.  p.  61.    M^ekeberg,  d.  tiMoL 
tcr  d.  A.  Krantz,  llarab.  1851. 

a)  The  hut  age  of  the  Church,  1851  Dublin.  ISM.  4. 


CHAP.  VI.    OPPOS.  &  BEFOBU.    |  S97.  WTCLIFFR    S29&  HUSS.  347 

however,  assured  of  his  personal  freedom  by  the  House  of  Commons,  and 

betook  himself  to  his  own  rectory  of  Lutterworth,  where  he  had  leisure  to 

complete  his  principal  work  containing  his  Augnstinian  system  of  scriptural 

scholasticism,  and  his  propositions  for  the  reformation  of  the  Church.  (6) 

His  influence  was  exerted  by  means  of  his  translation  of  the  Scriptures  'from 

the  Vulgate,  his  sermons,  (c)  his  pamphlets,  and  some  poor  priests  whom  he 

tent  among  the  people,  and  many  were  known  to  be  his  adherents  to  whom 

the  name  of  Lollards  was  transferred,  but  he  produced  no  permanent  religions 

iiDpresBion  upon  the  masses  of  society,  and  the  insurrection  which  occurred 

in  his  day  among  some  peasants,  in  favor  of  liberty  and  equality,  was  only 

uded  by  a  misunderstanding  of  his  doctrines.    His  views  were  principally 

received  and  promulgated  by  the  higher  classes  and  men  of  learning,  and 

hence,  no  sooner  was  the  government  hurried  into  a  sanguinary  persecution 

(after  1400)  than  all  his  adherents  were  easily  thrust  back  into  obscurity.    It 

was  with  especial  reference  to  Bohemia  that  the  anathema  of  the  Church 

against  the  views  of  WyclilTe  was  made  so  severe  at  the  Council  of  Constance. 

§  298.    John  Hum  and  the  ffussites. 

L  Tbe  Utentare  of  the  Soarces  may  be  fonnd  in  //.  v.  Anfae**^  Anz.  f.  Knndo  d.  deot  MA.  1SS8L 
^T8>  mf».—filit.  H  ^anumm.  J.  Ilium  ct  IlUr.  Piuig.  Nor.  (1558.)  1715.  2  vols  t  Gerichll.  Ank- 
IigiQ.  vertbeld.  d.  J.  H.  ohe  cr  n«cb  Constanz  ging,  mitgetb.  ▼.  Lebmann.  (Stud.  u.  Krlt  1S37.  P.  1.) 
Xuf  tbings  are  In  IltinH  &  in  Aen.  Syltil  Hist  Bobomor.  Bom.  1475.  f.  &  often.— JS><M«yna,  Calix- 
Uaff,  Canzler  rL  Neiwt  Prag,  Diarium  belli  Huss.  {J.  P.  de  Ludetoig,  Beliqaiae  Maooflco.  vol.  YL 
Comp.  Duffrotrmti/  In  d.  Ablih.  d.  bObm.  Oesellscb.  cL  Wiss.  1733.  p.  SUSas.) 

II.  /.  nHnhl^ien^  Hist  HuMltar.  Mog.  1549.  f.  Z  Theobald,  llnssltenkrleg.  NUrnK  1621.  8  ed. 
BnL  170a  8  vols.  4.  ZiUe,  Lebensb.  d.  J.  II.  Prag.  1789.  f.  2  vula.  A.  Z&m,  IL  za  Coatn.  Lps.  1880. 
A  6.  r.  d.  UorH,  de  Ilasal  vita  praesertlmq.  illiua  condemnati  causia.  Amst  1387.  E,  ds  £onn4- 
(i^  J.  Has  e  le  (^na  de  Constance.  (Lea  reformateara  avant  la  ret  voL  L  II.)  Par.  1845. — Pa- 
^jr,Ge8cb.  v.  Brthm.  1845.  vol.  III.  Abtb.  1.  {J.  A.  ITei/grt,  Has  o.  Hier.  Stadie.  Prag.  1858.)— 
Jamdw,  Oeach.  d.  cbr.  BeL  u.  K.  Tb.  XL  p.  9S0iaA,—Len/antj  Hist  de  la  guerre  dea  Husa.  Amst 
1181.  S  voK  A.  Prsb.  17S3.  4  vols.  Supplement  p.  Beauiohre^  Laua.  1745. 4.  \^Bonnecho9e'9  work  above 
Kftmd  to  was  repubL  in  Paris  in  1SA8.] 

Ever  since  the  middle  of  the  14th  century  a  few  eminent  priests  of  Prague 
who  had  been  persecuted  but  not  silenced,  as  preachers  of  repentance  (a)  and 
is  their  writings  (b)  had  contended  against  a  corrupt  clergy  as  tbe  Antichrist, 
^  hftd  endeavored  to  draw  off  the  minds  of  men  from  the  human  institu- 
tions of  the  Church  to  the  apostolic  laws,  to  the  universal  priesthood,  and  to 
ft  cmcified  Redeemer.  John  IIuss,  of  Hussinecz  (after  180b),  a  Professor  of 
^losophy,  a  scholastic  realist,  and  (after  1402)  n  Bohemian  preacher  in  the 
<%)«I  of  Bethlehem  at  Prague,  followed  in  their  footsteps.  Toward  himself 
^  Was  rigidly  severe,  but  toward  others  he  exhibited  a  fHendly  disposition, 
^  reading  was  not  extensive  and  was  principally  directed  to  the  histories  of 

>)  THtloj^na  (Dialogor.  I.  IV.)  1892.  (Bas.)  1525.  4  Frcf  et  Lpa.  175a  4. 

«)  EngdharflU  WycL  als  Predleer.  ErL  1381 

•)  Cenr.  of  Waldimusen  d.  1869.  Jan  of  Steknu,  about  1360.  Milicz  d.  1874  J.  P.  Jordan^  d. 
^•rtloifcT  d.  HuMltcnth.  In  Biibmen.  Lps.  1346. 

*)  Matth.  V.  JatuAC,  d.  1894,  de  regulls  Vet  et  N.  TestamcnU  1892,  de  abominationc  &  de  antl- 
^'^'^  veonljr  sectiona  of  tbis  work,  the  last  baa  been  regarded  as  a  writing  of  IIuw  (Hist  et  Mo- 
■Wtt.  tol  I.  p.  876c&)  Jfeander,  M.  v.  J.  ala  Vorlliufer  d.  deut  Bef  u.  Beprasent  d.  neuen  Priodpa. 
v^iMeaicb.  Abbh.  ed.  by  Jacobi.  BrL  1851.  pi  92.)    Extncta  in  JordMi  A  Neander  (KOasch.) 


\ 


348  MEDIAEVAL  CHUBCH  HISTORY.    PBS.  IV.    A.  D.  181f-1617. 

the  nuurtyTB,  and  his  eloquence,  thongh  oonsidfirable,  was  owing  more  to  his 
lofty  enthnsiasm  than  to  bis  natural  talents.    He  was  devotedly  attached  to 
the  Romish  Chnrch  until,  in  consequence  of  the  intercourse  between  Oxford 
and  Prague  ho  became  acquainted  (about  1408)  with  the  reformatory  wri- 
tings of  Wycliffe,  in  which  he  recognized  particular  truths  of  the  greatest 
importance,  and  soon  publicly  avowed  his  admiration  of  the  name  of  Wye- 
liffe.    His  preaching  and  his  publications  were  then  directed  against  the 
worldliness  of  the  clergy  and  the  abuses  of  the  papacy,  but  it  was  not  long 
before  his  direct  reference  to  the  gospel  led  him  to  announce  that  all  clergy- 
men possessed  equal  authority,  that  a  visible  head  was  not  needful  to  the  gen- 
eral Church,  that  the  congregations  possessed  some  special  rights,  that  tithes 
were  nothing  but  alms,  and  that  civil  authorities  had  a  right  to  confiscate  any 
property  of  the  Church  which  had  been  perverted  to  improper  uses.    As  long 
as  the  votes  of  Germans  were  most  numerous  in  the  councils  of  the  Univer- 
sity the  writings  of  Wyclifie  were  condenmed  there.    But  by  iq>pea]ing  es- 
pecially to  a  feeling  of  old  national  jealousy  he  succeeded  in  obtaining  the 
passage  of  a  law  (1409)  by  which  the  German  corporations  were  deprived  of 
their  privileges  in  the  academic  republic.    In  consequence  of  this  proceeding 
the  University  lost  most  of  its  students  and  became  strictly  Bohemian,  and 
Huss,  himself,  became  an  object  of  hatred  in  all  parts  of  Germany,  (e)    With 
him,  at  the  head  of  an  evangelical  clergy,  advanced  the  impetuous  but  learned 
knight,  Jerome  of  Prague,  who  had  just  returned  from  an  academic  cmsade 
in  behalf  of  Wycliffe^s  scholastic  principles.    On  the  complaint  of  the  Arch- 
bishop of  Prague,  IIuss  was  cited  to  appear  at  Rome,  deposed  and  excommu- 
nicated OS  a  Wycliffite  (1410),  but  he  appealed  to  a  pope  better  informed,  and 
in  consequence  of  his  favor  with  the  people  and  King  Wencealaus,  the  arch- 
bishop found  it  necessary  to  become  reconciled  to  him  (1411).    When  John 
XXIII.  (1412)  had  indulgences  offered  for  sale  to  raise  ftinds  for  bis  crusade 
against  Naples,  Huss  boldly  preached  against  them,  and  against  the  erection 
of  the  standard  of  the  cross  in  opposition  to  professed  Christians.    The  bull 
of  indulgences  was  burned  at  the  public  pillory  in  the  same  manner  in  which 
the  archbishop  had  burned  the  writings  of  Wycliffe,  public  tranquillity  was 
disturbed,  and  the  disturbance  was  avenged  with  blood.    The  views  of  Hosi 
were  now  elevated  above  all  regard  for  the  Roman  Church,  and  he  formed  A 
conception  of  the  true  Church  as  a  communion  of  all  who  have  been  eternal^ 
elected  to  life,  the  head  of  which  could  not  be  the  pope  but  Christ  aloiM^ 
since  no  earthly  dignity,  no  human  choice,  and  no  visible  sign  could  conftr  % 
membership  in  it.  (d)    When  the  place  of  his  residence  was  placed  by  a  bo^ 
under  an  interdict  (1413),  he  retired  to  the  castles  of  his  friends,  and  preflcb^ 
to  the  people  with  great  power.    As  he  had  appealed  to  a  general  ooonciJL 
God,  and  to  Christ,  the  Emperor  Sigismund  summoned  him  to  Consta^^ 
He  freely  obeyed  this  citation,  trusting  to  his  own  orthodoxy,  and  prep^^ 
if  necessary,  to  lay  down  his  life  with  joy.    He  was  soon  thrown  int<^^ 
finement  (Nov.  28,  1414) ;  the  Bohemian  and  the  Polish  nobility  «>n  V^ 


c)  J.  T.  Held,  Tentainen  hl«L  lllostrandls  rebus  a.  1409  In  Univ.  P«g©n«  gMtU.  ^. 
W,  Tamet,  GejMsh  d.  Prag.  Univ.  Prag.  1S49.  p.  4788.  ^*  * 

cf)  Tr.  d.  EcoL  (UUt  et  Monum.  vol.  L  {x  243.) 


CHAP.  YL    OPPOS.  &  HEFORM.    |  SM.  UU8S  A  THE  HUSSITES.  349 

for  his  rights  in  Tain,  and  the  emperor  had  nothing  hnt  a  blush  to  give  as  an 
apology  for  the  violation  of  his  safe  condnct.  (e)  Some  of  the  charges  alleged 
against  him  he  was  able  to  deny,  and  others  he  coold  modify — ^be  had  never 
Rjeoted  the  doctrine  of  transnbstontiation,  the  pope  had  been  created  by  Oon- 
atantine  only  with  respect  to  his  temporal  honor  and  earthly  possessions,  a 
king,  a  pope,  or  a  bishop  in  mortal  sin  was  in  the  sight  of  God  nnworthy  of 
the  name,  and  snch  a  priest  could  not  properly  administer  the  sacraments. 
The  council  required  him  unconditionally  to  recant  his  opinions,  and  con- 
demned him  for  his  obstinacy,  since  he  would  make  no  concessions  except  to 
the  authority  of  the  Scriptures  or  of  reason.  (/)  A  person  of  a  different 
character  might  perhaps  have  extricated  himself  without  betraying  the  cause 
of  truth,  and  indeed  have  become  a  leader  in  the  synod.  The  farewell  let- 
ters which  Huss  wrote  to  his  friends  were  full  of  heroism  and  tenderness,  (^) 
and  he  died  (July  6, 1415)  praising  Christ  and  fully  believing  that  his  cause 
would  become  victorious  at  some  future  period,  in  the  hands  of  more  power- 
fbl  men.  (A)  Jerome  at  first  recanted,  but  soon  recovered  his  courage,  sum- 
moned his  judges  before  the  Supreme  Judge  of  all,  and,  according  to  an 
aooount  left  us  by  a  philosopher,  died  with  the  fortitude  of  a  Stoic,  (t)  Theo- 
logical heresies  were  charged  against  these  men,  only  in  an  indefinite  man- 
ner, and  by  a  misunderstanding  of  their  views.  When  we  find  that  a  liberal 
aflsembly  like  that  of  Constance  rewarded  these  liberal  effoi-ts  by  martyrdom 
at  the  stake,  we  must  also  recollect  that  the  hostility  of  the  scholastic  school, 
the  hatred  of  the  Germans,  and  the  bitterness  of  the  clergy  on  account  of  the 
general  contempt  to  which  they  had  been  exposed,  all  co-operated  in  pro- 
ducing the  result.  But  the  decisive  object  which  the  hierarchical  party  had 
in  view  was  simply  to  terrify  its  opponents  by  bringing  to  the  stake  men 
whose  sentiments  were  so  similar  to  theirs ;  while,  on  the  other  hand,  they 
were  sacrificed  by  the  liberal  party  lest  it  should  expose  itself  to  the  suspicion 
of  sharing  in  their  heretical  sentiments.  But  a  large  part  of  the  Bohemian 
nation  were  seized  with  horror  at  the  cruel  deed  perpetrated  at  Constance, 
under  the  guise  of  sanctity,  and  in  a  body  they  rose  in  rebellion.  Huss  and 
Jerome  were  honored  as  martyrs,  and  the  priests  and  monks  became  victims 
to  a  most  terrible  and  sanguinary  vengeance.  A  custom  introduced  by  Jacob 
of  Misa  and  approved  by  Huss,  according  to  which  the  cup  in  the  Sacrament 
was  administered  to  the  laity,  was  now  made  the  badge  of  the  Hussite  cove- 
nant (k)  When  WcnceslauSj  who  had  retained  possession  of  his  crown,  in 
consequence  of  the  weakness  of  his  government,  died  (1419),  and  Bohemia 
became  the  inheritance  of  his  brother,  the  emperor,  the  greater  part  of  the 
estates  refused  to  swear  allegiance  to  a  prince  who  had  broken  his  promise, 
and  they  therefore  raised  the  standard  of  civil  war  (1420).    The  Hussites 

«)  On  the  otber  lumd :  J.  Haas  u.  &  Qeleitsbr.  (Hist  poL  BL  1889.  toL  IY.  H.  7.) 
/)  A,  Coppenherg^  utrum  IL  doctr.  fberit  heretica  ot  merito  uutb.  proecripta?  Monast  1884 
g)  Briefe  d.  J.  H.  za  Eonstanz.  Nach.  d.  buhm.  Urtezte  ed.  by  F.  Mikowec.  Lpa.  1849. 
A)  Hist  et  Monn.  vol.  L  p.  88«a.  yol.  II.  p.  51588L— iTan^i  an  yere  de  Luthero  Taticinatas  sit  Haas? 
(Ywm.  Abhb.  BnL  1821.  pi  157as.) 

0  roggii  Epi  ad  Aretln.  (eo.  Orelll  Tur.  lS85i    Ilardt  Th.  III.  p.  64n.)  Hist  et  Monn.  Th.  IL  p. 

L~A  HdUr,  H.  y.  Prag.  L&b.  1885. 
k)  MarUni  Dn  de  Ja&  de  Misa.  Altd.  1758.  i.  oonl    Sehreibmr^  de  Petro  DreedensL  Lpa.  1678. 4. 


350  MEDIAEVAL  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  IV.    A.  D.  1S1^1517. 

were  divided  into  two  parties,  of  which  the  milder,  called  Calixtinet  (Utrm 
quists),  reduced  their  demands  to  four  articles :  the  privilege  of  freely  preflcb 
ing  the  word  of  €rod,  the  administration  of  the  Lord's  Sapper  in  hoth  f<Nniii 
the  return  of  the  clergy  to  the  apostolic  life  of  poverty,  and  the  right  of  thi 
congregation  to  punish  all  mortal  sin.  The  other  more  rigid  party,  called  th< 
TahoriteSy  cl  timed  to  he  the  true  elect  of  GK>d,  rejected  nnconditionally  all  thi 
principles  of  the  Church  which  could  not  be  proved  from  the  Scriptnrei 
expected  in  a  short  time  the  second  advent  of  Christ,  and  under  their  iniSitta 
ated  leader,  Ziaka^  carried  on  a  war  of  extermination  against  the  neighborini 
nations.  After  the  death  of  Ziska  (1424),  his  place  was  filled  by  a  moo] 
whose  name  was  Frocopius^  but  as  many  of  the  troops  looked  upon  the  lo6 
of  their  general  as  irreparable,  they  called  themselves  Orphans.  Altfaoii|^ 
these  parties  were  opposed  to  each  other  they  became  united  when  a  comnMn 
danger  threatened  them.  Every  army  sent  against  them  by  the  emperor  o 
the  papal  legates  was  beaten,  being  composed  only  of  mercenaries  under  tb 
name  of  crusaders,  and  opposed  to  a  people  whose  wrath  had  been  powei 
fully  awakened.  The  conquerors  were  now  in  the  most  cautious  muine 
summoned  to  appear  before  the  Council  at  Basle.  After  much  debate  tb 
Calixtines  came  to  an  agreement  (1488)  respecting  their  articles,  and  it  wa 
agreed  that  the  word  of  God  should  be  regularly  preached  under  the  direc 
tion  of  spiritual  superiors,  that  the  Lord's  Supper  should  be  adminSstere 
under  both  forms  by  the  special  authority  of  the  council,  that  the  prt^ierl; 
of  the  Church  should  be  managed  by  the  clergy  according  to  the  usages  o( 
the  fathers,  and  that  mortal  sins  should,  as  far  as  possible,  be  punished  h, 
the  civil  magistrates  according  to  law.  The  Taborites  and  Orphans,  who  it 
garded  this  compromise  with  contempt,  were  overcome  (May  80,  1484)  at  th 
battle  of  Prague,  and  Bohemia  became  subject  to  the  emperor  by  a  trettf 
formed  at  I(flan  (1436),  by  which  religious  and  political  liberty  were  secnrei 
to  the  people  on  the  basis  of  the  compromise  with  the  council.  Bat  thi 
treaty  was  in  many  ways  violated  in  favor  of  the  Catholics,  who,  after  th 
dispersion  of  the  Taborites  were  a  sufficient  match  for  the  Calixtines  aloM 
On  the  death  of  Sigismund  (1437),  when  the  nation  were  called  upon  t 
choose  a  successor,  controversies  respecting  the  succession  sprung  up,  sni 
civil  wars  were  prosecuted  with  no  decisive  results,  until  at  the  Diet  of  Kni 
tenberg  (1485)  a  religious  peace  was  established  by  King  Wladislaus,  whio] 
secured  the  Catholic  and  Calixtine  parties  in  the  possessions  which  they  tbeo 
held.  So  long,  however,  were  the  Hussites  agitated  by  political  storms  tha 
ultimately  none  of  their  advantages  remained,  except  the  outward  form  of  th 
cup  in  the  sacrament,  and  recollections  of  former  glory. 

§  299,     The  Bohemian  and  Moravian  Brethren. 

Kbcher^  die  8  Torn.  QUnbenftbekennt  d.  R  Br&d.  Frkt  u.  Lpz.  1742.  J.  Camerarii  hist  Btm 
tlo  de  ft-atrnm  orthod.  eecleslis  In  Boh.  Moravia  et  Pol.  (about  1570.)  Heldlb.  1600.  Fret  IflSBL  i 
Comenii  Ilbt.  fhit  Bohemor.  (Arnst  1660.)  c  praeC  Buddel.  Ual.  1708.  i.  Locknar,  Eotatak  i 
enXe  Schicksale  der  BrQdergem.  in  B.  xl  M.  N&rnb.  1888.  A.  Kdppen^  d.  KOrdnimg  a.  Dteiptta.  < 
alten  hoss.  Br&derkircbo.  Lpa.  1846. 

A  small  band,  composed  principally  of  remnants  of  the  TaboriteSi  bn 
mollified  by  necessitous  circumstances,  became  dissatisfied  with  the  ooneec 


CHAP.  YL    OPPOS.  *  BEFORll    {299.  BOHEMIANS.    |80a  WE8SEL.         351 

ik>ii8  made  to  the  Catholics,  and  the  low  state  to  which  the  evangelical  spirit 
bad  declined,  and  therefore  separated  themselves  from  the  Calix tines  (after 
1450).  Their  congregations  were  prescrihed  on  the  eastern  borders,  but  soon 
became  numerous  in  Bohemia,  Moravia,  and  Poland,  in  spite  of  severe  perse- 
oatioiia.  Their  first  bishops  received  ordination  from  the  Waldensian  bishops, 
tnd  seyeral  remnants  of  the  Waldenses,  with  other  pious  and  peaceable  per- 
I0D8,  were  received  into  their  community.  They  were  generally  poor,  quiet, 
well  yersed  in  the  Scriptures,  and  divided  into  three  classes  in  regular  grada- 
tions, called  Novices,  Proficients,  and  Perfect.  They  rejected  the  saints  and 
prelates  of  the  Catholic  Church,  taught  that  there  was  a  mystical  connection 
between  the  body  of  Christ  and  the  elements  of  the  Lord^s  Supper,  did  not 
pretend  to  be  the  only  saving  Church,  but  only  members  of  it,  and  by  an 
ecclesiastical  discipline  like  that  of  the  first  centuries,  maintained  a  habit  of 
life  rigidly  moral,  spiritual,  and  pious,  though  in  many  respects  contracted  in 
itsoljects. 

§  800.    Learned  Precursors  of  the  Reformation  in  Germany. 

Nearly  all  the  subjects  which  so  powerfully  agitated  the  world  during 
tbe  conflicts  of  the  next  century,  were  more  or  less  discussed  by  learned  men 
in  the  midst  of  the  general  opposition  to  the  Church  raised  by  science  and 
piety  in  the  fifteenth  century.    The  great  points  common  to  them  all  were 
&e  purification  of  the  Church  by  means  of  the  Scriptures,  and  the  reception 
of  Christianity  as  the  only  saving  faith.    John  (Pupper)  of  Ooch^  rector  of  a 
ooDvent  of  nuns  in  Mechlin  (d.  1475),  endeavored  to  find  Christianity  in 
those  errors  which  have  in  all  ages  been  its  snare,  viz.  the  perpetual  observ- 
anoe  of  the  Moeaic  law  in  some  form,  faith  without  works,  satisfaction  with 
works  without  divine  grace,  and  finally  vows  as  indispensable  conditions  of 
evangelical  perfection,  (a)     John  Wessel  (Gansfort),  originally  from  Gron- 
iDgeo,  but  afterwards  a  resident  successively  in  Cologne,  Lou  vain,  Paris,  and 
Heidelberg,  whose  mental  activity  at  last  found  congenial  employment  in  the 
itining  excitement  of  a  counsellor's  and  a  teacher's  life  (Lux  Mundi,  Mag. 
contradictionum,  d.  1489),  has,  in  the  style  of  the  Scholastics  and  Humanists, 
conceived  of  Christianity  on  a  basis  of  mysticism,  and  regarded  it  as  some- 
thing entirely  spiritual,  wholly  confined  to  a  man's  own  heart  and  God.    His 
expressions,  therefore,  with  regard  to  ecclesiastical  institutions  are  generally 
very  limited,  and  formed  with  a  careful  exclusion  of  all  reference  to  doo- 
Wnea.    "  The  Holy  Scriptures,  God's  own  abbreviated  word,  ia  the  living 
Monroe  of  aU  true  faith ;  the  Church  is  based  upon  a  compact ;  there  is  a 
pBneral  priesthood  of  the  rational  universe ;  &ith  is  to  be  reposed  only  in  an 
^^''tliodox  pope,  and  not  in  every  council ;  sins  can  be  for^ven  by  none  but 
^^<>d;  excommunication  has  only  an  external  influence;   indulgences  refer 
^*^^  to  ecclesiastical  penalties ;  repentance  is  internally  complete  through  the 
'^S^teousness  of  Christ  and  God's  free  grace,  when  we  are  sincerely  grieved  for 
cur  ains ;  the  true  satisfaction  for  sin  is  a  life  in  God ;  and  purgatory  is  noth- 
^^  bat  the  purifying  influence  of  a  longing  after  God."  (b)    His  friend  John 

*)  Dt  Ub«rUte  cbr.  ed.  C  OraphmUy  Anta.  1521.  4.    De  qoataor  errorib.  Dial  in  Walch,  Mon. 

9tnL  ToL  L  Fue.  4.  Comp^  WaicV*  Vorr.  p.  Xllba 
h  Aooil»etkmofhUthooltr— ti—i;  Farrag0  WmmU  (1081.)  Witt  1688.  And  often.  LaUr  pneC 


352  MEDIAEVAL  CHURCH  HISTOBT.    PER  IT.    A.  D.  me-lUT. 

(Rucnrath)  of  Wesel^  a  professor  in  Erftirt,  and  a  preacher  in  Wonns,  stand* 
ing  on  the  ground  of  the  rigid  Angnstinian  theology,  made  an  assault  upon 
the  received  system  and  usages  of  the  Church.  If  the  names  of  all  the  elect 
are  inscribed  from  eternity  in  the  book  of  life,  he  inferred  that  no  excommu- 
nication could  ever  blot  them  out,  no  absolution  could  insert  any  in  addition 
to  them,  and  no  observation  of  merely  human  statutes  with  which  the 
Church  is  burdened,  could  raise  them  to  a  higher  rank.  As  long  as  pK>po- 
sitions  like  these  were  not  addressed  to  the  people,  they  could  be  toleri^ed 
under  favorable  circumstances  as  learned  doctrines  in  the  schools.  But  Jc^n 
of  Wesel,  who  glorified  Christ  although  he  despised  the  pope,  was  accused 
by  the  Dominicans  of  Mentz,  was  compelled  to  recant  when  old  and  sick, 
and  was  finally  imprisoned  in  a  convent  (1479)  until  he  was  set  at  liberty  by 
death  (1481).  {c) 

§  801.    Jerome  Saronarola, 

L  TratUto  circa  il  regimento  di  Flrcnxe.  Fir.  U94  ed.  6.  1847.  Compendio  dl  rlrelazloni.  Fir. 
1495.  4.  (Conip.  revell.  Flor.  1495.  4.)  De  riinplldtate  Titai)  cbr.  Flor.  1490.  4.  Trlnmphas  crnds. 
Flor.  1497.  4.  Expoff.  in  Psalmum :  Miscrerr  mcL  Flor.  1498w  4.  and  often,  eqtedally  sermcma  and 
letters.  Catalogae  in  Meier,  p.  89(teA.— Koman  view:  Burehardl  Diarinm.  {Eccard  r<A.  IL  p. 
20S7M.  PauiM,  Bi'ltrr.  z.  I).  K,  n.  Hel.  Gcsch.  Brem.  1887.  p.  SSlw.)  Apohigetical :  J.  F.  Pteut 
de  Mirandula,  Vita  Patrls  II.  Sav.  1580.  (with  other  orlg.  Docc.)  ed. .;:  QnHif,  Par.  1674  8  vote,  11 
Pad/.  Burlamacchi,  Vita  del.  P.  Sav.  ed.  Manti  in  Btduaii  MiscelL  Luc  1791.  f.  toL  L  (Barlamao* 
chl,  d.  1519.  Mans!  has  edited  only  the  byjierortbodox  revision  by  BotUmi,  which  waa  not  made  tfll 
1527.  I  have  nought  in  vain  at  Florence  fur  the  original  text  not  longer  ago  than  1852,  nnmeroat 
Codd.  in  the  BIbl.  Msgliahecchiana,  contain  the  simple  text  of  Mansi  with  only  unimportant  yarl*- 
tions.)  In  connection  with  Oen.  llii^t. :  Guicclardini  \.  IH.  p.  9988.  MaccfiiaveUi :  Diflconl  I, 
11.  45.    Principe  c  8.     Commiw*  VlII,  2.  19. 

II.  Buddeu9  de  artib.  tyran.  Sav.  Jen.  1690. 4  with  his  later  Retractatia  (Parerga  hist  Jen.  1719.) 
F.  W.  P.  r.  Ammon,  Grondz.  d.  Theol.  d.  Sav.  ( Wintr**  krit  J.  182a  vol  VIIL  H.  S.)  Rudtlbadi, 
lller.  Sav.  u.  a.  Zeit  Ilamb.  1S85.  K.  Mfler,  Glr.  Sav.  BrL  1836.  K.  Ilat,  Sav.  (Nene  Pr«»pb««ciL 
p.  97.)    {R.  R.  MaddM,  Life  and  Mart  of  J.  Sav.  Lond.  1858.  2  Tola.  &] 

After  a  period  of  literary  activity  in  a  convent,  the  Dominican  SatonO' 
tola  hecame  known  as  an  impressive  preacher  of  repentance  in  Florence 
(after  1489).  He  reproved  the  sins  of  great  men  as  freely  and  as  faithfhlly 
OS  those  of  ordinary  men,  and  predicted  that  divine  judgments  were  abont  to 
break  forth  upon  Italy,  but  that  a  great  purification  of  the  Church,  proceeding 
from  Florence,  should  follow  from  these  severe  troubles.  He  also  predicted 
the  approaching  ruin  of  the  house  of  the  Medici,  and  the  march  of  a  foreign 
king  across  the  Alps,  to  chastise  the  tyrants  of  Italy  and  to  reform  the 
Church  with  the  sword.  Accordingly,  Lorenzo  Medici  died,  Charles  VIIL 
advanced  (1494)  across  the  Alps,  and  the  sons  of  Lorenzo  were  banished 
from  Florence.  After  this  partial  fulfilment  of  his  prophecies,  and  when  the 
people  by  his  advice  had  seized  upon  the  government  of  the  republic,  the 
state  was  entirely  dependent  upon  his  counsel,  although  he  never  interfered 
with  the  details  of  the  administration.    He  looked  upon  a  government  hj 


by  Luther  in  bis  W.  by  Walch^  vol.  XIY.  p^  219.  0pp.  Gronfng.  1614  4— &.  /7.  Goeat,  de  Jo.  W«i 
Lab.  1719.  4  O.  Muurling^  de  Wesseli  Oansfortii  cam  vita,  lam  meritis  in  pracpar.  aaetorooi  eHMi- 
daUone  in  Belgio  sept  P.  L  (Vita.)  Tpij.  ad  Rh.  1881.  C.  UUmann^  J.  Weaselt  eln  Yoiigioger  Loth. 
Hamb.  1884    Die  2  amg.  A.  in  d.  Beformatoren  vor  d.  Be£  toL  II. 

o)  Ub  treatise  adv.  indnlgentias  in  WaleK,  L  c.  Fase.  I.  p.  111.    Legal  doeomeiiti  felatti^  t»  Ml 
trial  in  ArgeiUH  toL  L  P.  IL  pw  891i8b    UUmann^  toL  L  p.  Wlwk 


CHAP.  TL  OPPOS.  A  REFOBM.  $  801.  SAVONAROLA.  353 

tbo  people  as  most  appropriate  to  snch  a  place  as  Florence,  and  he  advised 
that  it  should  be  a  spiritual  community,  established  upon  the  principles  of 
the  fear  of  God,  true  patriotism,  and  peace  among  all  its  citizens.    From  his 
pulpit  he  commenced  a  great  moral  reformation.     Ilis  system  of  faith  was 
founded  upon  that  of  St.  Thomas,  though  it  deviated  somewhat  in  the  direc- 
tion of  the  Mystics,  and  was  animated  by  the  spirit  of  the  Scriptures.    Of 
eonrse  he  had  no  hope  of  salvation  from  the  saints,  nor  from  his  own  works, 
bat  his  whole  trust  was  in  the  grace  of  God.    Although  he  declined  the 
dangerous  appellation  of  a  prophet,  he  derived  his  predictions  from  a  pro- 
phetic spirit  nourished  by  the  Scriptures,  and  he  believed  that  in  his  conclu- 
Bons  he  could  no  more  be  mistaken  than  that  God  himself  could  err.    Alex- 
ander  VI.,  wounded    in  various   wa3's,  and    threatened  with  a  council, 
endeavored  to  silence  the  terrible  prophet  at  first  by  brilliant  promises,  and 
afterwards  by  sending  him  a  crafty  summons  to  Rome  (July  21,  1405).    Sa- 
Yooarola  excused  himself  on  the  ground  that  he  could  not  at  that  time  be 
absent  from  Florence.    Many  Florentines  were  offended  at  the  rigid  morality 
vhich  in  its  enthusiasm  held  a  carnival  with  the  works  of  luxury  and  art, 
and  consigne^l  them  to  an  auto-da-f6.    The  noble  families  were  chagrined  at 
tbe  ridiculous  manner  in  which  the  government  was  conducted  by  a  monk 
and  the  people.    An  attempt  to  restore  the  Medici  was  expiated  with  the 
heads  of  its  authors,  in  the  midst  of  legal  forms  before  unknown.    The 
ttnrdy  confidence  which  Savonarola  reposed  in  the  King  of  France,  brought 
tbe  city  of  Florence  into  a  dangerous  political  condition,  and  the  retreat  of 
tbe  king  gave  a  ridiculous  aspect  to  his  prophecies.    Already  was  his  influ- 
ence over  the  minds  of  the  people  abated,  when  he  was  forbidden  by  the 
Boman  authorities  to  enter  the  pulpit  (Oct.  1496).    As  he  would  not  allow 
the  word  of  God  which  burned  within  him  to  be  smothered,  he  was  excom- 
monicated  (May  12,  1497).    He  regarded  such  a  prohibition  as  utterly  void 
wben  opposed  to  the  spirit  of  love,  and  concluded  to  appeal  from  the  earthly 
to  the  heavenly  Pope.    lie  therefore  continued  to  preach  to  the  people, 
tamring  them  that  his  cause  would  be  triumphant  though  he  himself  should 
nffer  martyrdom.    The  Franciscans  placed  themselves  at  the  head  of  the 
oppodtion  to  the  Dominicans  of  his  convent  of  St.  Mark,  the  people  became 
excited  at  the  disappointment  which   their  curiosity  had   received  when 
aaembled  to  witness  a  divine  trial  of  his  claims  by  the  ordeal  of  fire,  for 
vbioh  neither  of  the  champions  had  any  inclination  or  confidence,  and 
fisaHy  the  city  was  threatened  with  a  papal  interdict.    The  convent  of  St. 
Jtark  was  attacked  by  a  mob,  a  few  of  Savonarola's  adherents  were  struck 
down,  and  he  himself  was  thrown  into  prison.    An  extraordinary  court  of 
jvtioe  compelled  him  to  confess  on  the  rack  that  he  had  played  the  part  of 
*  fwopbet  from  motives  of  ambition.    Condemned  by  the  judgment  of  the 
I^  as  a  heretic,  and  by  the  voice  of  the  Signoria  for  crimes  not  specified, 
iM  ^OQsly  submitted  himself  to  death,  and  between  two  brothers  of  his 
<*^  was  burned  at  the  gibbet  (May  28,  1498).    Even  the  politic  Secretary 
^  State  in  Florence  considered  it  becoming  to  speak  of  such  a  man  with 
'•Terence.    His  portrait,  with  the  halo  of  sanctity,  painted  by  Fra  Bartolo- 
0^  ia  suspended  in  the  gallery  of  St.  Mark  even  to  the  present  day. 

23 


354  MEDIAEVAL  CHX7BCH  HISTORY.  PKR.  lY.    A.  D.  I91f-1S1T. 


CHAP.  Vn.— THE  GREEK  CHURCH. 

§  802.    Arsenius. 

O.  Pachymerf  III,  10. 14. 1988.  IV,  las.  VII,  28.    Nictph,  Gregorat  III,  1.  IV,  1m.  VII,  t.- 
Kngelkardt,  die  Arscnianer  u.  Ilesycbiisten.  (Zeitscbr.  t  hist  Tli.  1888.  vol.  VIIL  H.  1.) 

A  complete  re-establishment  of  the  monarchy  had  been  prevented  by  tlu 
introduction  of  an  arrangement  resembling  the  feudal  system,  and  by  th( 
formation  of  an  independent  nobility,  composed  of  those  families  which  w«n 
contending  against  the  occupation  of  the  country  by  the  Latins.  The  Chnrd 
regarded  itself  as  the  moral  power  by  which  the  unity  of  the  nation  was  tx 
be  preserved  and  the  empire  was  finally  to  be  restored.  But  when  Mickat 
PalaeologuB  actually  set  up  the  imperial  authority  in  Constantinople  (1261) 
he  had  the  lawful  heir  to  the  throne,  John  Lascaris,  deprived  of  his  sight 
For  this  act  the  patriarch  Arsenius  pronounced  sentence  of  excommunicatioi 
against  the  emperor  (1262),  who  was  compeUed  by  the  murmurs  of  the  peo 
pie  to  promise  compliance  with  every  penance  required  of  him.  But  whei 
the  patriarch  demanded  that  he  should  lay  aside  the  purple  which  he  hai 
unlawfully  seized,  the  emperor  retaliated  the  ecclesiastical  Bann  with  a  dvi 
banishment.  He  also  succeeded  in  gaining  over  a  synod  to  his  purposes,  b] 
which  Arsenius  was  deposed  (126G),  on  the  ground  that  his  election  and  hi 
administration  had  been  irregular.  Only  three  gold  pieces  which  had  beei 
earned  by  transcribing  the  Psalms  were  found  in  the  episcopal  treasury 
Even  when  banished  to  a  desert  island,  and  with  his  last  breath,  the  deposei 
patriarch  rejected  the  prayer  of  the  emperor  to  be  reconciled  to  the  Chnroli 
The  next  patriarch  was  obliged  to  yield  to  the  popular  displeasure.  Michac 
then  succeeded  in  having  a  popular  saint  consecrated  as  patriarch,  by  whan 
the  restoration  of  the  emperor  to  the  communion  of  the  Church  was  finslh 
effected  (1268).  But  an  influential  party  of  monks  called  Arsenites  persistei 
in  rejecting  the  emperor  and  his  patriarch.  This  dangerous  schism  was  no 
healed  until  Andronicus  caused  the  dead  body  of  Arsenius  to  be  deported  ii 
the  holy  place,  and  the  wrong  which  had  been  committed  against  him 
atoned  for  by  a  penance  imposed  upon  the  whole  nation  (1812). 

§  808.     The  Light  of  God  and  Philosophy, 

L  Among  contemponriea,  for  Barl  NicepK  Oregora*  XI,  10.  Against  blm,  Jo.  Oania 
9HB.  (Both  in  the  Corp.  Scrr.  Byz.  Bonn.  1828a8.  P.  XlXa.)    DocamenU  in  ManM  toU  XXVa^ 
II.  Petavitu,  do  tbeoL  dogmatib.  voL  L  L  L  c  12a.    EngeUMrdt,  de  Hesycb.  ErL  1S89.  4. 

Mount  Athos^  with  its  dark  forests,  in  which  tradition  says  no  creature  o 
the  female  sex  can  exist,  and  looking  far  out  upon  the  sea,  had  become,  aftc 
the  ninth  century,  covered  with  monasteries.  These  constituted  a  republi 
made  up  exclusively  of  monks,  from  which  the  Eastern  Church  was  snpplie 
with  bishops,  (a)  In  this  place  Barlaam,  a  classically  educated  monk  fitH 
Calabria,  found  monastic  saints  who  thought  they  could  attain  while  yet  i 
the  body,  by  a  perfect  cessation  of  corporeal  life,  an  intuition  of  the  divii 


a)  J.  P.  Fallmerayer^  Fragmenta  a.  d.  Orient  Stattg.  184S.  toL  IL    Cknnp.  Sostathiu  ▼.  Tkc 
Mlonich,  CL  d.  Mdnebastaad.  flrom  the  Greek,  hy  O.  L.  F.  7\^/d,  Tab.  1847. 


CHAP.  VIL    GBSEK  OHUBCn.    {997.  LIGHT  OF  GOD.    |«06.  UNION.       355 

Light  and  Efleenoe.    The  method  they  adopted  appears  to  have  produced  a 
kind  of  magnetic  clairvoyance.   When  Barlaam  ridiculed  these  Quietists  f  Hoi;- 
xaoTtu)  as  navel-gazers  CO/x(/>uXo^t;xot),  Gregory  Palamas  maintained  that 
the  divine  light  might  be  intuitively  contemplated,  and  referred  to  the  newly 
created  light  which  surrounded  our  Lord  on  Mount  Tabor.    Barlaam  rejoined 
that  nothing  but  God  could  be  uncreated,  and  consequently  that  his  opponent 
had  made  out  that  there  were  two  Gods.    A  synod  convened  in  Oonstantino- 
ple  (1841)  decided  in  favor  of  the  monks  of  the  sacred  mount,  and  Barlaam 
paased  over  into  Italy  and  to  the  Roman  Church.    At  Constantinople  the 
eontroversy  was  carried  on  with  reference  to  various  pointed  questions,  and 
with  many  interferences  from  the  court,  until  it  reached  the  conclusion 
(1850) :  that  God's  essence  and  energy  were  distinguishable ;  that  there  is  an 
uncreated  energy,  like  the  light  on  Tabor,  which  is  inseparable  from  God, 
and  that  this  was  denominated  Deity  by  the  fathers,  although  it  is  subordi- 
luite  to  the  divine  essence.    Platonism,  whose  gospel  was  proclaimed  by  Ge- 
miBtUB  PUtho  at  the  time  of  the  Synod  of  Florence,  generally  maintained  its 
inoos  trust  in  opposition  to  the  worldliness  of  Aristotle,  but  its  radical  prin- 
ciples were  deeply  fixed  in  an  affectionate  attachment  to  Greek  antiquity.    It 
was  therefore  accused  of  being  a  new  form  of  heathenism  by  those  who  de- 
feaded  Aristotle,  whose  system,  on  the  other  hand,  had  now  become  adapted 
to  the  requirements  of  the  Church,  (b) 

§  804.     AtUmpU  at  Union.     Cont,  from  %  235. 
Leo  AUatiut,  GraodA  orthod.  Bom.  1602. 1669.  9  toI^  i. 

While  the  Latins  possessed  the  imperial  authority,  a  reconciliation  be- 
tween the  two  Churches  was  impossible,  on  account  of  the  political  abuses 
of  which  the  Greeks  complained,  and  the  exorbitant  demands  of  the  domi- 
nant Church.    But  when  Constantinople  ag^  became  the  capital  of  the 
Greek  empire  and  of  the  Greek  Church,  the  emperors  were  anxious  to  effect 
areooQciliation,  or  at  least  the  semblance  of  one,  because  during  the  thir- 
teenth century  they  were  apprehensive  of  another  crusade  from  the  West, 
and  after  the  fourteenth  century  they  were  desirous  of  aid  against  the 
Turks.    At  tlie  Council  of  Lyons  (1274),  therefore,  Michael  Palaeologtu 
sUowed  his  representatives  to  subscribe  the  Roman  confession  of  f(dth,  reserv- 
ing only  the  old  established  usages  of  his  Church,  (a)  and  at  the  Synod  of 
Fhrtnee  (1480)  the  union  of  the  two  Churches  was  consummated  by  the 
Greek  emperor  and  the  Patriarch  himself  (h)     But  the  people  were  entire 
(Grangers  to  any  such  union,  and  when  the  throne  of  the  Palaeologi  was 
^fftttened,  the  popular  party  betook  themselves  to  the  Comneni  at  Trobi- 
*i<^   The  learned  men  on  the  Greek  side  defended  their  Church  by  proving 
^  igreement  with  ecclesiastical  antiquity,  and  those  of  the  Latin  party  de- 

h  itfOo,  d«  P1«t  atqne  Arist  phfL  differentia.  Par.  1541.  Oeorg.  TrapexwU.  Compar.  Ar.  et 
^  Vet.  159&-.  W.  (TdTM,  OeonadloB  a.  Plotha  Bresl.  lS4i.    The  2d  part  contains  both  treaUiea. 

«)  Raynald.  ad  ann.  1267.  N.  72^.    Maivti  rol  XXIY.  p.  60.  67Ba, 

b)  laiihH  et  Couartti  Conco.  toL  XIIL  p.  SlOaa.  Sylv,  Sguropuli  vera  Hist  nnlonls  non 
**>eht«rQr.  «t  Lat  bl  Codcl  Flor.  narreda  Or.  et  Lat  ed.  R,  OreygMon^  Bm%.  Com.  160a  4  On 
'*>««(i>«»lde  £«o  .i2<al  Bom.  16«fi.  4 


356  MEDIAEVAL  CHUROH  HISTOBY.    FEB.  IT.    A.  D.  1916-1517. 

fended  theirs  after  the  example  of  St.  Th<mia9^  (c)  hy  forged  original  docu- 
ments and  false  constructions  of  the  Greek  fathers.  Once  more,  when  the 
Turkish  hastions  had  heen  already  erected  against  the  walls  of  Constantino- 
ple, a  reconciliation  was  celebrated  in  December,  1452,  and  a  Roman  cardinal 
legate  held  mass  in  the  Church  of  St.  Sophia.  But  the  only  effect  of  this 
was  that  the  consciences  of  the  people  were  fretted,  and  their  love  was 
alienated  from  the  emperor  himself.  The  only  true  union  of  the  Chnrchea 
took  place  in  the  social  circle  of  the  Platonist  Cardinal  Bessarion  (d.  1472), 
Archbishop  of  Nicaea,  who,  after  the  Synod  of  Florence,  abandoned  a  cause 
which  he  regarded  as  desperate.  By  his  interest  in  the  cause  of  his  na- 
tive land  and  her  exiled  children,  he  subsequently  proved  that  he  was  not 
a  deserter,  but  a  mediator  between  two  nations  and  two  mental  king^ 
doms.  (d) 

§  805.    End  of  the  Greek  Empire. 

After  Phi*arua^  Ihtetu,  ukl  others,  CntMus  Tarco-Graeola.  Baa.  1664  t    J.r.  Hammer,  Qtach. 
d.  osman.  Beicha.  Pesth.  1827aa.  voL  I.  p.  OOQsa.  vol  IL 

Abandoned  by  Western  Europe,  after  one  more  glorious  struggle  on  May 
29,  1453,  New  Rome  was  stormed  by  the  Turks,  and  the  church  of  St  So- 
phia was  desecrated  and  converted  into  a  mosque.  The  family  of  the  Palae- 
ologi  retired  to  the  Peloponnesus,  and  there  wasted  away  until  it  became 
extinct  (1460).  The  Comueni  indulged  the  vain  hope  that  they  could  obtain 
deliverance  by  the  surrender  of  Trebizond  (1462).  (a)  One  Christian  hero, 
Scanderbeg^  who  had  formerly  attained  the  highest  dignities  among  the  Mo- 
hammedans, but,  late  in  life,  had  forsaken  them  all  to  become  a  Christian, 
now  effected  the  deliverance  of  Epirus,  for  more  than  twenty  years  withstood 
the  whole  power  of  the  Ottomans,  and  finally  may  be  said  to  have  been 
overwhelmed  rather  than  overcome  (1466).  (b)  His  Albaniane  became  more 
properly  the  allies  than  the  subjects  of  the  Porte,  and  generally  adopted  a 
false  kind  of  religion  intermediate  between  that  of  Christ  and  that  of  Mo- 
hammed. The  Mainota  and  the  Thieves  remained  independent  tribes  of  Chris- 
tians in  the  mountains.  The  remnant  of  the  Grecian  nation  was  allowed  by 
Mohammed  IL^  the  conqueror  of  Constantinople,  to  continue  under  a  mild 
form  of  servitude  and  in  the  free  enjoyment  of  their  religion.  Gennaditu^ 
who  had  been  chosen  patriarch  by  order  of  this  sultan,  presented  to  him  the 
confession  of  faith  of  the  Oriental  Church,  in  which  were  embraced  all  thote 
important  particulars  in  which  Christianity  is  distinguished  from  Islam,  (e) 
One  half  of  the  churches  remained  in  possession  of  the  Christians  until  the 
beginning  of  the  sixteenth  century,  when  the  Sultan  Selim  appropriated  as 
many  of  them  as  he  thought  needful  to  the  use  of  the  Mohammedans.  The 
patriarch,  being  regarded  as  a  high  political  officer,  receives  his  confirmation 


e)  Opnsc.  ooDtra  errores  Oraecorara  ad  Urban  lY. 

d)  A.  Banditti,  de  viU  et  reb.  gesUs  Bmb.  Rom.  1774  4.    K  ffoM^  Besaarioii.  (HaU.  EnqrcL 
voLIX) 

a)  Fattmerayery  Oeech.  d.  KaisertiL  Trapezuut  Munloh.  1S27. 

b)  MaHnu9  BarUUw  de  yiU  Oeorgii  CaatrloU  L  XIIL  Argent  1587.  t  to  be  modified  bf  Ofb- 
Um  &  Bdmmer,       c)  0099,  Abtb.  IL  p.  80s. 


CHAP.  YIL    OBEEKCHUBCH.    S  806.  TUBEISH  RULE.  357 

or  deposition  according  to  the  will  of  the  saltan.  He  has  a  permanent  synod 
of  bishops  and  notables  to  act  as  his  coancil  and  jadicial  conrt,  in  connecdon 
with  which  he  is  the  arbitrator  and  jadge  of  his  people.  The  administration 
of  justice  in  civil  matters,  and  generally  with  respect  to  minor  offences,  is 
performed  in  the  episcopal  coartfi.  These  have,  it  is  true,  no  power  but  that 
of  arbitrators,  yet  the  fear  of  being  excommunicated  by  them  is  so  great  that 
this  \a  snfScient.  (d)  The  Greek  Church  was  compelled  to  share  the  depressed 
fortunes  of  its  people.  It  now  undertook  the  vocation  of  consoling  a  people 
overwhelmed  by  misfortunes,  and  of  preserving  its  own  peculiar  institutiona 
until  a  brighter  day  should  dawn  upon  it. 


d)  0.  GHb.  JHnL  d.  BechUznst  in  Qrleohenland  wahrend  d.  tark.  Herrabalt^  Heidelb.  1S85. 


i 


MODERN  CHURCH  HISTORY.  I 

FIFTH   PERIOD. 

FROM  LUTHER  TO  THE  PEACE  OF  WESTPHALIA. 


-•♦*- 


For  Oen.  History:  Ck>rre8pondenz  K  Karls  Y.  ed.  bj  K.  Lanz,  Lpa.  1844aB.  8  vols.  Guiceiardini 
(pi  888X  P.  Giovlo,  Hist  roi  temp.  (1493-1513.  15S1-27.)  Flor.  1550fl.  A  often.  De  Thou,  Hist  soi 
temp.  (1&48-1607.)  Frdl  4  vols.  f.  &  often.  KhevenhOUr,  Ann.  Fenlinandei,  8  ed.  (157S-1687.)  LpiL 
171006. 12  vols,  t  Goldast,  Imp.  Rom.  FrcC  1607.  t  k  Constt  Imp.  R.  FrcC  161S.  8  Tola,  t  Koch, 
Samml.  d.  Relchsabschlede.  Fret  1747. 4  vols.  t^Saatrow,  (10O5i)  Herkomroen,  Gebnrt  n.  Laaf  a.  "Lt- 
ben^  ed.  by  Mohnlke,  Qrelfiw.  1828s.  8  ycAx^^Robertaon,  Hist  of  the  Emp.  Cbaries  Y.  Lond.  1789L 
8  Tola.  4.  ed.  by  Frost,  1  vol  a  New  York.  1S40.  Uebera  t.  Remer,  Bmaeb.  1793.  8  to1&  F.  t.  B^ 
choltB^  Ferd.  I.  Ylcnna.  1882-a  9  vols.  [8.  A.  Dunham,  H.  of  the  Oennanlc  Empire.  Lood.  18S4-A. 
8  Tol&  &  W.  a  Taylor,  Ano.  it  Mod.  Hist  New  York.  1846.  2  Tola,  a  W.  SmU\  JaxO.  on  Mod. 
Hist  &C.  2  TOlsL  a  Lond.  1S41.  W.  JRuueU,  Hist  of  Mod.  Europe  to  176a  8  Tola,  a  New  Nork. 
F.  Kohlrauach^  Hist  of  Germany,  transl.  by  Haas.  New  York.  1847.] 

D         §  306.     General  Vieto. 

The  necessity  of  a  reformation,  now  nmversally  recognized,  was  the  prin- 
cipal legacy  beqaeathed  by  the  preceding  age.  This  work  now  commenced 
among  the  people  simultaneonsly  in  Saxony  and  in  Switzerland.  It  was  the 
result,  not  of  literary  improvement,  though  in  connection  with  it,  nor  of  eon- 
tests  with  the  papacy,  although  much  of  its  success  was  owing  to  the  arro- 
gance and  the  corruptions  of  that  system,  but  principally  of  the  fear  which 
pious  persons  felt  lest  true  repentance  and  salvation  should  be  ntteiiy  lost 
sight  of  in  the  eager  chase  after  indulgences  and  human  merit  It  was  not 
until  the  Reformation  was  decidedly  opposed  by  the  hierarchy,  that  the 
Ohurch  was  compelled  by  the  inevitable  force  of  circumstances  to  divide.  It 
was  then  that  the  principle  of  Protestantism  which  had  previously  been  sub- 
ordinate, led  its  friends  to  establish  an  independent  Ohurch,  that  Christianity 
might  there  find  an  appropriate  development.  This  was  accomplished  in 
Switzerland  in  the  midst  of  isolated  struggles  among  republican  parties,  and 
in  the  interior  of  Germany,  in  the  midst  of  learned  controversies,  solemn 
imperial  transactions,  popular  commotions,  and  mercenary  wars.  Both  re- 
forming parties  justified  their  views  by  appealing  to  the  Soriptora,  and 


1 806i  OENEBAL  VIEW.    %  SOT.  LITERATUBB.  359 

expected  salvation  wholly  from  the  grace  of  God  through  Ohrist;  both 
serioQslj  misunderstood  each  other,  not  indeed  at  first,  but  at  a  very  early 
period,  and  both  were  German  in  their  national  characteristics,  although,  as 
was  to  be  expected  in  a  border  country,  the  Helvetic  Ohurch  partook  at  an 
early  date  of  a  French  admixture.  The  Reformation  now  began  its  course 
around  the  world.  Political  interests,  foreign  to  its  true  objects,  in  some 
instances  interrupting  and  in  others  promoting  its  progress,  became  involved 
in  the  conflict,  but  the  ecclesiastical  interest  never  ceased  to  be  prominent. 
In  consequence  of  the  very  opposition  it  had  received,  Catholicism  renewed 
its  energies,  and  Western  Europe  became  divided  into  two  great  hosts,  which, 
in  the  very  country  where  the  Reformation  originated,  contended  with  earthly 
weapons  for  the  existence  of  Protestantism.  Its  rights,  however,  were  finaUy 
purchased  at  the  expense  of  the  devastation  and  disunion  of  Germany.  Both 
Churches,  while  agitated  by  the  highest  excitement  of  opposition,  were  finally 
obliged  to  leave  each  other  in  peaceable  possession  of  what  each  actually 
occupied.  The  development  of  this  contest,  and  its  results  in  the  contend- 
ing Churches,  constitute  the  central  object  of  our  history  during  this  period, 
and  supply  the  peculiar  conditions  according  to  which  the  topical  arrange- 
ment will  be  formed. 


CHAP.  I.— THE  GERMAN  REFORMATION. 
§  807.     Original  Authoritita  and  Literary  History, 

JL  L  Wiitiogs  of  the  Reformers  {  809.  3ia    Spalatini  Ann.  Bef.  (till  1548.)  ed.  by  CTprUn.  Lps. 

1118.    F.  Myconii  Ubt  Ref.  151S-42.  ed.  by  the  same.  Gotba  (1715.^  1718.—,^  CochJUie^vt,  Cmtr.  de 

■etti  et  tcrr.  Latherl  1517-47.  Mog.  1549.  t  A  often.  L.  Suriun,  Chronlcon  1500-6(1  Col  1567.—.^  SM- 

damutt  de  atatu  reL  et  r^iip.  Carulo  V  Caes  Cmtrr.  Ar^;.  1555.  f.  complete  1557.  &  often.  111.  am  End*^ 

Tnl  1785^  8  Tula.  Uebor^.  v.  Stroth,  IlaL  1770sa.  4  void.    Contin.  u.^.  ad  1561.  Landorp.  FrcC  1619. 

9to1&  4.    [Ilbt  of  the  KeH  of  the  Church.  1517-68.  from  the  Latin  of  J.  Sleidanus,  by  JS.  Bohtm, 

Lond.  1689.  f  ]— ColIeetl«>ns:  F,  IfortUder^  Ilandlungen  a.  Aosschrelben  v.  d.  Uraachen  d.  dt  Kriega 

vldcr  d.  Sehmalk.  Bundt^-Verw.  (till  1555)  FrkC  1617a.  8  vok  t  Gotba.  1645.  t     U.  t.  d,  UardU 

HM.  Utter.  KeC  FrcC  et  L.  1717.  t    R  IdicAer,  vollst  ReC  Acta.  (1517-19.)  Lpz.  1720sit.  8  to1&  4. 

J.Kapp,  Nachlese  z.  Ref.  Gcsch.  n&tzl.  Urk.  LpA.  1727ss.  4  vols.    Strobel:  MiscclL  N&rnb.  1778«. 

CIIl  BeKrr.  z.  Lit  17S45.H.  2  A;  5  vols.    Johanrmen,  die  Entw.  d.  Prot  Oeiste.%  e.  Samml.  d.  wlch- 

t%itta  Dokamente  v.  Wormsw  Edict  b.  z.  Sp.  Prot  Kopenh.  1380.    C.  O.  Naud^cker  :  Urkunden  a. 

iBc£  Zeit  Caaa.  1S86.  ActenstQckn.  Numb.  lS8Sw  Neue  Beitrr.  Lp«.  1341.  2  vols.   C.  E.  Forttemann, 

Hcnei  Urkandenb.  z.  Gesch.  d  KRoC  Ilamb.  1S42.  1  vol  4.    J.  K.  Seidemann :  Erluutt  z.  Ret 

0«Mfa.  Dnd.  1944.  Beitrr  z.  ReC  Oesch.  Drsd.  134G.  8  Th.   Yitae  quatuor  Reformator.  Luth.  a  Mel. 

^^Oamsrario^  ZwtngL  a  JWyconlo,  Calv.  a  Se»tt.  Praef.  est  Neander.  Ber.  1841.  4.    i/i  Ada*ni 

^l^Qermanor.  Tbeologor.  Heidelb.  1620.— IL  P.  &irpi,  {P.  Soave  PoL)  1st  del.  Cone,  dl  Trcnto, 

^^^.  1619.  t  it  often.    Illst  Cone.  Tridcntini,  Lond.  1620.  Lpi.  1690.  2  voK  4  Jc  often.    Uebers.  v. 

*««6ac»»  Hal.  176188.  6  vols.    v.  WlnUrer,  Mergenth.  1889.  4  vols.    PtUUivicini^  1st  del  CJonc  dl 

^  Bon.  1646.  8  Tol&  t  Mendrislo.  1886aa  10  vols.  Ut  redd.  GUitUna,  Anta.  1670.  8  voIa.  t  it  oftan. 

^^<^  T.  KUUdu,  Aogsbw  1386.  8  voK  Bowuti,  Hist  dea  variations  des  Egl.  prot  Par.  16S8.  8  yoIbl 

^ Soften.  1784.  4  rola.    L.  Maimhourg,  Hist  da  Lutheranlsmc.  Par.  1630.  4.  it  often.    JC.  Rifely 

K6«8ch.  (L  neaeaten  2>it  Mainz.  (l&41s<i.)  1344-7.  8  vols.—  V.  L.  de  Sfckendorf,  Cmtr.  hist  et  apoL 

^UthenaianKv  FrcCetL  (1638.4.)  1692.1:    Uelicrs.  u.  vrm.  v.  Frick^  Lps.  1714.  4.    Ausx.  n. 

^•"^  ▼. /iMiiiMi,  Frkf.  u.  L  1755.  4  vols.  \Tb.  v.  Rooe.  Tab.  1793.  8  vol*.     Teyitxfl^  hist  Ver.  v.  d. 

**  «•  ErL  Seekend.  ed.  by  CtfpHan,  Lpa.  1718.  2  vols.    C,  A.  &aig,  Gesch.  cL  A.  Conf  (1517-62.) 

^1780«L  8  vols.  4     C  J.  Planck,  Gesch.  d.  Enst  Verilnd.  u.  Bild.  nns.  prot  Lehrbjrr.  b.  z.  Con- 

•^^m  (1781m.  8  vols.)  1791-1800.  7  vols.     WoUmann,  Gesch.  d.  Ref  in  DeutscliL  Alt  (ISOIssl) 

ttl^  «  vok    MarhHnehe,  Qeach.  d.  teutsch.  Be£  b.  1555.  (1817.  8  vols.)  ISSlss.  4  vols.    C,  A,  Men- 

^  ^  6«ich.  (Neaera  Gesch.  d.  DeatschL  18  rol&)  BraL  1826. 8  roUi  L.  Ranke,  deatache  Oeadb.  im 


i 


360  MODERN  OHUSOH  HI8T0BV.    PER  T.    A.  D.  ISIT-IMS. 

Zelta.  d.  Sef.  Beri.  1839-48.  3  ed.  1892.  5  volfl.  A  1  ed.  «  volflu  Soarces :  [nist.  of  tbe  Bcf.  In 
trmiuL  hj  Sfrt.  AiuUin^  2  vok.  &  Lond.  18lfi.]  K.  llagen,  DeatachL  lit  u.  rel.  Verh.  ira  Rtt  Ztitt. 
Erl  1S41~44.  8  vols  (2  <&  8  voI& :  Gelst  d.  Kef.  o.  a.  Gegensatze.)— «^  G.  Midler^  Denkw.  a.  d.  Gesch. 
d.  Ref.  (Reliq.  alter  Zeit  vol.  8.)  Lps  1806.  Rcf.  AlmaDacb,  ed.  bj  Keywr,  Erf  1S17.  1818.  189QL 
1821.  Rotermnnd^  «rn.  Andenken  d.  Mfinner  die  f^r  a.  gegen  d.  Ref  Lath,  gearbeitct  liaben.  Brea. 
1818. 1  Tol.    C.  Q.  ytudeck^r,  Gescb.  d.  ev.  Prot  to  Deutachl.  d.  a.  anare  Tagei  Lpz.  1S4U.  2  rok. 

B.  I.  Writings  of  the  Reformers  $  8^1.  816.  V.  Anaheim,  Bemor  Chronilc  till  1526.  ed.  hy  StUr' 
Hn  Jc  Wi/s»,  Bern.  lS25e&  vol  Vs.  Ui  BuUinger'9  Ref  Gosch.  (till  1582.)  ed.  bj  //ottinfferA  VdaeU, 
Franenf  ISSSaa.  8  vols.— Ref  Clironik  d.  Karthfins.  Georg.  aebern.  daroh  K.  Baxtiirf  Baa.  1SI0.— 
J.  Q.  Pan»l.i:  Beytrr.  z.  Erl.  d.  K.  R.  Ulst  d.  Scbweizerl  ZQr.  Uilss.  5  vols.  Epp.  ab  Ecc  llely.  Ka- 
fomiator.  vel  ad  ena  acr.  Tig.  1742.  J.  J.  SimUr^  Sml  alt.  u.  neu.  Urk.  Z(tr.  ITftTsa.  6  vols.— XL  MtUm- 
bourg.  Hist  du  Calvtnisme.  Par.  \6S2.—Siiyl^,  Critique  gen.  de  TH.  da  Calv.  Rott  16S4.  2  vo1&  12.  A 
Lettree  de  Tantear  de  la  Critique  R.  168ft.  J.  Btttniige^  Hi»t  de  la  ReL  dea  6g1.  r6ft»rmeea.  (Rot  lOMi 
2  Tola.  12.)  llaje  1725.  2  vola.  4.  J.  J.  ffoUing^r,  helv.  KGesch.  Z^.  1696ea.  4  toU  4.  A.  Ruekut, 
H.  de  la  R^^f  de  la  Suiaae.  (Gon.  1727dL  6  vols.  12.)  Nyon.  1835-8.  7  vola.  J.  de  Btatuobre,  Uiat  de  la 
r6f  (Ull  1580.)  Ber.  1785.  8  vola.  L.  Win  A  if.  Kii'chhofer,  neaere  bdv.  KOeecli.  ZQr.  lS18-:9.  8 
vola.— ^.  SeuUeU  Ann.  Ev.  renovatL  lldlb.  1618.  Gerdta:  Introd.  in  Hist  Ev.  renovatt  (1516-aft.> 
Oron.  1744881  4  Th.  4.  Scrinium  ai  MiaeelL  ad  Ref  spect  Gnm.  1748m.  8  Tb.  4.  K,  R.  HaQetthack^ 
Yorleae.  &.  Weaen  a.  Geacb.  d.  Ref  Lpo.  (1S84.  2  vola.)  1651.  J.  H.  Merle  d'Attbigni,  Hlat  de  la  rit 
d.  16  allele.  Par.  1S858.  4  voK  [Hist  of  the  Rcf.  of  the  16tb  cent  by  J.  IL  Merle  D*Aabign6,  transL 
by  H.  White.  Edinb.  A  New  York.  1847-185a  4  vols.  12.  IT.  Stebblng,  Hiat  of  the  ReH  2  votai  IS. 
Loud.  1886.    O.  Waddlngton^  Iliat  of  Ref  on  tbe  Continent  8  vola.  a  Lond.  1841.] 

(7.  de  VUlere^  Eaaai  aar  Tesprit  et  rinfluence  de  la  r6f  de  Lath.  Par.  1802.  ed.  6. 1S5L  [Eaaaj  oa 
the  ReC  of  Luther  by  VllIer^  tranal.  by  &  MilUr,  1  vol.  12.  Phil.  1888.]  N.  d.  2  ed.  Ucbera.  ▼. 
CnifMr^  m.  Bell.  v.  Ilenke^  Ilamb.  (1805.)  1828.  v.  Stampeel  m.  Vor.  v.  Rosenm&ller,  Lpa.  (ISOSL) 
\%\9.^RoheU}t,  do  Tinflucnce  de  la  Ref  de  Luth.  Lyon!^  1S22.  Mayenoe.  1823.  J,  DoUinger^  d.  RcC 
iliro  Entw.  u.  Wlrk.  ira  (Jmfanged.  Lutlt.  Bckenutn.  Ratisb.  1846-8. 8  vol&—iC  G.  BrtUcktuid^^^, 
deutache  Ret  Lp&  1844 

The  events  of  the  Hefonnation  were  produced  principally  by  published 
writings,  which,  in  subsequent  times,  needed  only  to  be  collected.  The  ac- 
counts letl  by  Spalatin  (d.  1645)  and  Myconim  (d.  154G)  are  valuable  merely 
as  the  testimony  of  those  who  actually  witnessed  what  they  related.  A 
more  comprehensive  picture  is  presented  in  the  work  of  Coehlaeus  (Dobnek, 
d.  1562),  although  colored  by  the  peculiar  views  of  his  party.  In  oppodtioa 
to  his  abusive  representations  the  learned  statesman,  SUidanus  (Philipaon,  d. 
1556),  showed  by  original  documents  that  the  Reformation  was  a  woi^  of 
Providence,  in  which  the  whole  human  race  was  interested,  and  that  it  had 
important  relations  to  general  history.  In  the  contest  waged  against  Maifii' 
hourg^B  elegant  but  malignant  representation,  Seekendor/,  on  account  of  his 
access  to  the  archives  preserved  by  the  State,  is  entitled  to  a  place  among 
the  original  authorities.  Among  the  historical  writers,  the  Reformation  hM 
been  described  by  Sarpi^  a  real  Protestant  under  a  monk^s  cowl,  and  by  Pal' 
lavieinij  with  all  the  advantages  and  the  prejudices  of  a  cardinal.  JSomuei 
has  more  particularly  noticed  the  gradual  development  and  the  human  ele- 
ments, as  well  as  the  variations  and  arbitrary  character  of  the  Reformation. 
The  work  of  Planch  is  impartial,  but  sometimes  altogether  too  full  of  minate 
details,  while  that  of  MarheineJce  is  popular,  and  yet,  in  consequence  of  its 
documentary  character,  possesses  much  of  an  antiquarian  aspect.  Woltmann 
has  bestowed  special  attention  upon  the  rights  of  those  who  were  opposed  to 
the  Reformation.  A  vast  amount  of  original  authorities,  especially  from  tho 
records  of  the  German  empire,  has  been  brought  forward  in  an  intelligent 
maimer  by  Eanhe^  who  has  interspersed  in  his  narrative  many  admirable 
reflections,  and  in  a  style  of  almost  dramatic  interest  has  contrived  to  exhibit 
not  only  general  characters  and  incidents,  but  the  most  inaignifioant  agents  in 


OHAP.  L    BEFOBMATION.    S  806.  LnTHEB*S  YOUTH.  361 

their  atmoet  efforts  against  the  more  prominent  historical  personages.    Ln- 
ther*s  cause  has  been  described  with  much  less  precision  by  Ilagen^  as  the 
result  of  a  general  effort  at  a  compromise,  and  as  an  early  departure  from  its 
own  original  principles.     Hie  Helvetic  Reformation  does  not  so  clearly  pre- 
sent a  common  centre,  and  the  development  of  great  characters  in  the  midst 
of  great  events.    With  the  sympathies  of  an  actor  in  the  scenes  which  he 
deacribesi,  Bullinger  has  simply,  clearly  and  faithfnily  narrated  in  the  Chroni- 
cle of  his  own  times  and  vicinity  (1519-32)  not  only  those  incidents  which 
were  important,  bat  many  which  were  of  but  trifling  consequence  connected 
with  the  glorious  transactions  of  his  native  land.     As  Bayle  had  previously 
yindicated  the  Reformation  in  opposition  to  Maimbourg^s  passionate  shrewd- 
neaBy  so  Basnage  in  a  skilful  and  spirited  manner  defended  it  against  the  inge- 
nioos  declamation  of  Bossnet.    The  historical  materials  were  collected  with 
honest  diligence  by  Hettinger^  and  more  perfectly  and  more  skilfully  by  Ru- 
eia(,  bat  both  were  under  the  influence  of  a  powerful  party  spirit.    From  a 
podtioQ  in  which  he  happily  combines  practical  with  contemplative  views, 
Hagenbaeh  instructs  and  consoles  the  painfully  excited  age  in  which  he  lives, 
bj  holding  up  before  it  a  vivid  picture  of  preceding  times,  and  yet  preserves 
A  proportionate  representation  of  the  whole  Reformation.    In  the  lofty  and 
Attraeti?e  picture  presented  by  Merle  d^Avhigne^  the  author  seems  conscious 
of  a  perfect  agreement  with  the  reformers  in  their  theological  views,  and  yet 
arails  himself  of  all  the  resources  of  modem  literature. 

I.  Ebtabusiiment  of  thb  Lutheban  Chub  on,  till  1582. 

IirfUr.  Lltentnre :  Fahricii  Centifolium  Lutb.  Hamb.  172Sss.  2  vols.  Ukert,  L.  LobeiL  Qoth*. 
inr.  S  Tolt.  E.O.  VogO,  BibL  BIngraphica  Latbenna.  Ual.  1S51.  Works:  Lat  Yit  151568L  7  vols, 
t  Jes.  ISCMml  4  Toll,  t  Oerman,  Witt  1589b&  12  Tola.  f.  Jena  15S5m.  8  vola.  f  Altcnb.  1661aBi 
Ufok  £  td.  bj  «/:  (?.  WalcK,  Hal  1787-5&  S4  vols.  4.  According  to  tbe  orlg.  language  by  Ploch- 
Btto  4  Irmlscfaer,  ErL  1826-50.  68  vola.  (Selectiona  bj  PJUm',  ¥t\it  1887fi«.  O.  v.  Osrlach,  BrL 
lUim.  bj  Zimmtrmann^  Friif.  1846^.)  Letters  ed.  by  De  WetU,  Bri.  1S25-2&  5  vols.  Life :  Jtf*- 
(oMttM,  Illst.  de  vlU  et  actis  L.  ViL  1546.  den.  ed.  Augtuti,  Vrat  1817.  Uebera.  v.  Zimmermann 
«.  Aim.  T.  VitUrt,  GOtt  (18ia)  1S16L  J.  MaiheHm,  Hist  v.  L.  in  17  Pred.  NQrnb.  1565.  4.  &  often. 
Kiam.  r.  J?im^  BrL  ISll.  Tbe  MS.  Illst  of  JiuUeberffer^  &.  L.  a.  a.  Zeit  edit  by  Neudeck^r,  Jena, 
yXfi  IL  Waleh^  v.  L.  (Werke,  vol.  XXIV.)  F.  &  KHl,  Lpe.  1764.  4  vols.  4.  Scfirotckh,  Lpai  177S. 
^fMotr.QwiYi.  L  a.  d.  KVerb.  Berl.  18ia  1  vol.  Giut,  P/izer,  L.  Lt-ben.  Stnttg.  1836.  {Audin^ 
Hi«.d«la  vie  de  L.  Par.  (1888.)  1841.  2  vola.)  M.  Meurer,  L  Loben.  a.  d.  Quellen  (^rziiblt  Dread. 
OStlK.Svok)  1852.  If.  L.  der  deotache  KeC  In  bildl  Darst  v.  G.  Konig,  in  gcscb.  Umriaaen  v. 
B-  Qdttr,  Uamb.  1851.— AT.  Jurgeu*,  L.  Leben.  (1438-1517.)  Lps.  lS46s.  8  vok  [Botcer,  Life  of  L. 
*Mrt7  Prog,  of  the  Ret  8.  Jf.  AitcheUt,  Life  of  L.  New  York,  1846.  12.  J,  E.  RiddU,  L.  &  his 
''^46  Lond.  1887.  12.  J.  Scott,  L.  &  the  Lath.  Rot  New  York,  1833.  2  vola.  12.  Laicaon,  Aato- 
^HiOfLLood  Itoia] 

§808.    Luther's  Youth. 

Martin  Luther  was  horn  at  Eisleben  an  hour  before  midnight  on  the  lOth 
<tf  HoTember,  1488.  His  father,  John,  was  a  respectable  miner  belonging  to  a 
P^*MQtThuringian  family  in  Moehra,  (a)  and  afterwards  the  proprietor  of  some 
'<NQdrie8  and  a  councillor  in  Mansfeld.  He  was  in  early  life  subjected  to  a 
fl^tte  discipline.    Having  spent  some  time  with  the  NuUbrethren  at  Magde- 


^J)^-  C  Ortmann,  Moehra  d.  Stamrotort  Lath.  Saliang.  1844    yobbe,  Stammb.  d.  Familie  M.  L 
^'^"^  ISMl  Compi  {J.  C.  &  Thon,)  Schloaa  Wartbarg.  Eiai  1826.  p.  14da. 


i 


362  MODEBN  CHX7BGH  HI8T0BY.    PSB.  T.    A.  D.  ISlT-ieiSL 

burg,  and  fia  a  current  scholar  (5)  at  Eisenach,  where  he  was  sapported  for  a 
while  by  the  charity  of  a  matron  interested  in  his  earnest  style  of  singling  and 
praying.  With  the  view  of  preparing  himself  for  the  legal  profession  he 
became  a  student  (1501)  in  the  University  of  Erfhrt,  where  his  principal 
studies  wore  the  Dialectics  of  the  Nominalists  and  the  Latin  Classics.  He 
there  also  became  Master  of  Arts  and  commenced  reading  the  Physics  and 
the  Ethics  of  Aristotle.  But,  fbll  of  anxiety  for  the  salvation  of  hb  soul, 
alarmed  by  the  sudden  death  of  a  fHend,  and  haunted  by  terrors  respecting 
his  own  death,  on  the  night  of  the  17th  of  July,  1505,  he  fled  to  the  Augns- 
tinian  convent,  where,  in  spite  of  many  remonstrances  he  became  a  monk, 
and  in  1507  a  priest.  But  aU  the  austerities  of  a  conscientious  monaslao  life, 
all  the  humiliations  of  a  mendicant  friar,  together  with  the  most  intense  stndy 
of  the  scholastic  writers,  especially  Thomas,  Occam,  and  d'Ailly,  only 
increased  the  d^ection  of  a  mind  which  had  nothing  to  do  but  to  consume  its 
energies  in  a  course  uncongenial  to  its  nature.  The  Vicar  General  of  hia  order 
in  Germany,  John  of  StaupitZy  who  had  entered  into  Augustine's  doctrine  of 
faith  and  of  election,  with  all  the  ardor  of  a  sincere  love  to  GM  and  man, 
now  gained  his  confidence,  foresaw  his  future  greatness,  and  strove  to  cheer 
his  spirit,  (c)  Gradually  Luther  found  consolation  by  discovering  in  the 
Scriptures,  and  in  the  writings  of  Augustine  and  Tauler,  a  doctrine  which  had 
been  overlooked  by  Scholasticism  and  Monasticism,  but  which  taught  him  thai 
man  is  to  be  saved,  not  by  his  own  works,  but  by  faith  in  the  mercy  of  God 
in  Christ.  It  was  not,  however,  until  he  had  been  transferred  by  Staupitz  to 
Wittenburg  (1508)  that  he  began  to  find  rest  in  a  more  abundant  and  unre- 
strained activity.  He  soon  discontinued  his  lectures  upon  Dialectics  and 
Physics,  turned  his  attention  to  Theology,  acquired  a  knowledge  of  the  origi- 
nal languages  of  the  Scriptures,  took  delight  in  religious  disputations,  and 
finally  ventured,  though  with  great  reluctance,  to  preach.  In  1510  he  took  a 
Journey  to  Home  as  a  pilgrim,  ((Q  and  on  some  business  of  his  order.  During 
his  brief  residence  there  the  glories  of  Roman  antiquity  and  art  had  no 
attractions  for  him,  but  with  all  the  zeal  of  a  devoted  Catholic  he  Tinted 
every  church  and  grotto  there,  and  was  offended  by  nothing  but  the  levity 
of  the  inferior  clergy  with  whom  alone  he  then  became  acquainted.  His  call 
to  become  a  Doctor  of  the  sacred  Scriptures,  and  the  oath  he  was  then 
required  to  take  (Oct.  18,  1512),  raised  his  thoughts  to  higher  objects  than 
any  suggested  by  his  monastic  vow.  {e)  His  conscience  now  compelled  him 
freely  to  investigate  and  make  known  the  truths  of  Christianity.  Bat  though 
he  preached  Christ  instead  of  the  fables  of  the  saints,  and  the  grace  of  God 
instead  of  any  merit  acquired  by  human  prescriptions,  he  was  even  then  full 
of  wrath  at  the  obstinacy  of  heretics.  {/)    His  literary  efforts  were  directed 


\h)  Current  scholars  are  sach  as  get  thetr  living  by  alma  as  tbej  wandor  tbroagh  tba  town  and  aiiif 
and  pray  at  the  doors  of  tho  prlncii>al  citizens.] 

c)  Von  d.  Nachfolgang  des  will.  Sterbens  Chr.  151&.  Lib.  de  exsccat  aet  pra«destinatioBti.  1517. 
Von  d.  hulda.  Llobe  Oottesc  L[>s.  1518.— 6r.  II.  GdUe,  de  Stanp.  Lub.  1715.  4  a  L,  W,  Orirntn,  da 
BUnp.  cjusqne  in  sacronim  insuarat  nieritis.  (Zeitsch.  t  hist  Tb.  1837.  Tol.  YII.  H.  S.)  A,  />.  Gmtdtr, 
ViU  Staap.  GOtt  1887.  4.     VUmann,  Befll  Yor.  d.  Bet  vol  IL  p.  25660^ 

d)  Jurfferu^  vol  IL  p.  269ss. 

e)  Liber  Decanor.  Fac  tb.  Vlt  ed.  I\}erttemann^  Lps.  188S.  p.  lift.     Waick^  toL  XTL  p.  SOSL 
/)  JUrpsns,  ToL  ILL  p.  HOOh, 


CHAP.  L    BEFOBMATION.    $809.  TETZEL.    96  THESES.  363 

not  merely  against  the  Pelagian  external  holiness,  bnt  the  logical  forms  which 
Scholasticism  then  sanctioned,  and  these  occupied  his  attention  quite  ns  much 
as  his  expositions  of  the  Scriptures,  especially  of  the  Psalms  and  of  the  Epis- 
tle to  the  Romans.  But  the  University  had  already  abandoned  Aristotle  and 
Bubmitted  to  the  authority  of  Augustine,  {g) 

§  809.     The  Ninety-Fite  Theses, 

Albert  of  Mentz  authorized  tlio  sale  of  indulgences  in  Germany  for  the 
erection  of  St.  Peter's  church,  on  condition  tliat  one  half  of  the  profits  should 
be  his.    When  the  Dominican  Tctzel  carried  on  this  trade  with  the  utmost 
effrontery  in  the  dioceses  of  Magdeburg  and  Ilalberstadt,  Luther  found  at  his 
confessional  that  much  iiyury  was  done  by  it  to  the  practice  of  true  Chris- 
tian repentance.    He  therefore  preached  against  it,  and  wrote  to  tlio  neigh- 
boring bishops  {a)  against  it,  but  when  he  saw  that  he  was  despised,  {h)  on  the 
eve  of  All-Saints'  Day,  1517,  he  affixed  to  the  gate  of  the  Castle-Cliurch  of 
Wittenberg  (c)  ninety-five  propositions,  which  he  proclaimed  himself  ready 
to  defend  against  any  man  who  might  assail  them.    They  asserted :  That 
God  alone  oonld  bestow  true  absolution,  and  the  pope,  like  any  other  bishop 
and  pastor,  can  only  dispense  this  divine  absolution  to  penitents  and  believ- 
en ;  that  absolntion  might  indeed  be  beneficial,  but  could  not  be  indispensa- 
ble to  the  recipient,  nor  should  it  be  esteemed  higher  than  works  of  piety 
and  mercy ;  that  it  referred  only  to  ecclesiastical  punishments,  and  that  it 
was  then  so  much  abused  by  those  who  traded  in  indulgences,  and  was  so 
misunderstood  by  the  people,  that  if  the  pope  knew  what  was  going  on,  ho 
would  prefer  to  see  the  Church  of  St.  Peter  reduced  to  ashes  than  to  have  it 
built  by  snch  means. — Even  if  Lnther  really  thought  that  in  all  this  he  was 
maintaining  nothing  prejudicial  to  the  interests  of  the  Church  and  of  the 
papacy,  he  certainly  must  have  been  aware  that  he  had  thrown  out  a  chal- 
lenge to  the  most  powerful  prelates  and  monks. 

§  310.    Interference  of  the  Pope, 

Tetzel  now  raised  against  Luther  the  helpless  outcry  of  an  inquisitor,  (a) 
•ad  the  learned  Syheeter  Prierias,  a  high  officer  in  the  papal  palace,  de- 
eded the  cause  of  his  brother  Dominican  with  a  stately  indifference,  (h) 
Both  of  them,  however,  founded  all  their  arguments  upon  the  infallible  au- 
^^ty  and  absolute  power  of  the  pope.  In  his  reply,  and  especially  in 
<1)poaition  to  the  quotations  from  St.  Thom&<^  Luther  avowed  that  he,  like 
^  Aagnstine,  recognized  no  authority  as  infallible  but  that  of  the  sacred  Scrip- 
^^^^  {c)  The  Dominicans  made  every  effort  to  arouse  the  people  against  him. 

9)  Ih  WHU  ToL  L  p,  67. 

«)  «^  /.  Voifel,  Leben  d.  pSpsa  Gnaaen-Pred.  T.  Lpe.  (171T.)  1727.  J.  S.  Kapp,  Schanpl.  d.  T. 
^Minkrtn,^  Lp«.  1720.  and  Samml.  hierhcrgebor.  Schrr.  Lpa.  1721.  F.  O.  llofmann^  Lebcnsb.  T. 
^  18U.       I)  J&rgen*  vol  III.  p.  46886. 

^)  Dbputa  Dr.  M.  Lather!  pro  declarat.  virtutia  indalgentiar.  Printed  In  Ldtiher  vol  I.  p.  48S8& 
•<*5*  ToL  XVIIL  pi  SMbs.    Comp.  Walch  vol  XVII.  p.  1708. 

")  lotcker  vol  I.  p.  4S4,    Wimplna  In  favor  of  TeUel. 

*)  Dial  In  presumptuoaas  Luth.  concluslonca  de  potcatato  Papac.  {L^^lch€r  vol.  II.  p.  lis.) 

^  W  Ml  Prior.  (£dMA«r  toL  II.  p.  889aflL) 


364  MODERN  OUUBCH  HI8T0BT.    FEB.  V.    A.  D.  15ir-16i8L 

Bat  in  spite  of  all  their  endeavors,  his  well-terapered  discourses  and  writings 
oonvinced  the  people  that  what  he  had  taught  them  respecting  repentance 
and  the  ahuses  of  indulgences  was  true,  (d)  His  theses  flew  with  astonishing 
celerity  into  every  part  of  Germany,  and  were  commended  by  many  honest 
and  learned  persons,  but  the  silence  or  the  displeasure  of  the  prelates  lay 
heavily  upon  him,  and  he  became  alarmed  at  the  consequences  of  what  he 
feared  might  bo  his  own  rashness.  But  in  the  midst  of  all  his  internal  and 
external  conflicts,  the  conviction  became  more  and  more  settled  in  bis  mind 
that  he  was  contending  not  for  his  own  cause,  but  for  that  of  Ohrist,  and 
that  while  he  was  at  peace  with  his  beloved  Redeemer,  he  had  nothing  to  hope 
for  or  to  fear  from  the  world,  (e)  He  himself  had  sent  a  copy  and  a  defence  of 
hiB  theses  to  pope  Leo  X.,  (/)  accompanied  with  a  letter  in  which  he  ezpreases  a 
firm  consciousness  of  possessing  the  truth,  but  unconditionally  submits  his  per- 
son to  his  superiors.  (^)  He  was  summoned  (Aug.  7, 1618)  to  appear  at  Rome, 
but  the  Elector  of  Saxony  obtained  a  concession  that  he  should  be  examined 
in  a  paternal  manner  at  Augsburg  by  Thomas  de  Yio,  of  Gaeta,  the  cardinal 
legate.  Luther  appeared  (Oct.  1518),  under  the  safe  conduct  of  the  emperor 
and  the  city  of  Augsburg.  Cajetanvs^  a  learned  scholastic  of  severe  man- 
ners, expected  to  refute  Luther's  propositions  respecting  indulgences  by  sen- 
tences from  St.  Thomas  and  the  Decretals,  but  frightened  at  this  Ger- 
man beast  with  piercing  eyes  and  strange  speculations  in  its  head,  he  soon 
bade  him  go  away  and  never  return  until  sent  for.  Luther  privately  de- 
parted on  the  20th  Oct.,  having  entered  an  appeal  to  the  pope  when  better 
informed.  As,  however,  he  soon  after  became  more  and  more  satisfied  that 
he  could  expect  no  justice  from  a  court  of  Rome,  and  when  a  Bull  had  been 
issued  which  solemnly  confirmed  the  controverted  doctrine  of  indalgeneeSi 
he  changed  this  appeal  and  directed  it  to  a  General  Council,  (h) 

§  811.    Amicable  Negotiations. 

In  the  letter  which  Gcgetan  sent  to  the  elector,  he  demanded  that  Luther 
should  be  sent  to  Rome,  or  at  least  into  banishment.  Luther  justified  his  con- 
duct before  his  sovereign  (at  Augsburg)  by  pleading  that  it  was  his  duty  to  yield 
only  to  the  truth,  entreated  that  his  master  would  not  act  towards  him  the  part 
of  a  Pilate,  and  declared  that  he  was  ready  to  wander  forth  into  exile,  (a)  Bat 
Frederic  the  Wite  was  personally  a  friend  of  the  people,  and  as  a  prinoe,  was 
distinguished  for  his  caution  and  his  piety  toward  the  Church,  (h)  Though 
he  had  once  gone  on  a  pilgrimage  to  the  holy  sepulchre,  and  expended  much 
money  in  the  purchase  of  sacred  reliques,  he  now  prohibited  the  preaching  oi 
indulgences  within  his  dominions.  He  became  conscious  of  an  increasing 
attachment  to  the  evangelical  principles  maintained  in  the  writings  of  La- 


d)  Sermon  v.  AbUs&  a.  Onade.  Nov.  1517.  {U9ch^  toL  L  p.  468ia.) 
4)  Walch  vol.  XIV.  p.  470.    D^  WetU  vol.  L  p.  118. 
/)  Besolutluncfl  disput  de  virt  Indulgg.  (Ldtcher  vol  IL  pi  IBSol) 
g)  J>€  Wette  vol.  L  p.  11». 

K)  Augsb.  Acta  in  Ldtcher  vol.  II.  p.  486flB.    Waleh  vol  XV.  pi  544aa.    I>«  FMi  toL  L  ^ 
\4AsB.—BdrMr,  de  coll<.qulo  L.  c  Ci^.  Lpa.  1722.  4. 
a)  De  WeUe  vol  I.  p.  174m. 
h)  O.  Spalatin^  Loben  a.  Zeitgesch.  Fr.  d.  W.  (from  bis  MS8.)  Jen*.  IWl 


CHAP.  L    BKFOBICATION.    S  81t.  FBEDEBIC  THE  WISR    MILTITZ.  365 

ther,  although  he  was  always  undecided  and  distrustful  of  his  own  judgment  in 
fifpiritual  matters.  He  was  at  least  averse  to  all  violent  measures,  and  was  fearful 
ci  the  injury  which  his  university  at  Wittenberg  might  sustain  should  he  sacri- 
fice its  most  distinguished  instructor,  (c)  He  therefore  replied,  that  Luther^s  de- 
mand to  be  arraigned  before  an  impartial  tribunal  in  Germany  appeared  to  be 
nothing  more  than  was  reasonable.  The  pope  was  under  obligations  to  the  elec- 
tor, and  was  anxious  by  some  favors  to  secure  his  influence  to  prevent  the  Ger- 
man crown  from  being  bestowed  upon  his  grandson,  Charles  of  Spain,  by 
which  the  sapreme  power  in  Italy  and  Germany  would  once  more  be  com- 
mitted to  the  same  hand.  A  Saxon  nobleman,  Charles  of  MiltiU^  and  a 
chamberlain  in  the  papal  court,  was  sent  to  Saxony  for  the  purpose  of  effect- 
ing a  reconciliation.  During  his  journey  through  the  cities  of  the  empire, 
this  legate  found  that  public  opinion  was  already  so  decided  in  behalf  of 
Luther,  that  he  acknowledged  his  utter  inability  to  take  Luther  to  Rome  at 
that  time,  even  if  an  army  were  present  for  his  assistance.  In  a  respectful 
manner  he  summoned  Luther  in  Jan.,  1519,  to  appear  at  Altenburg.  He 
conceded  that  the  abuse  of  indulgences  was  wrong,  and  avowed  that  he  had 
already  expressed  his  displeasure  at  Tetzel,  but  he  entreated  at  the  same  time 
that  the  Church  might  not  for  such  a  reason  be  distracted  by  a  schism. 
Luther  promised  that  he  would  maintain  silence  respecting  indulgences  as  far 
as  his  opponents  would  do  the  same ;  that  he  would  receive  instruction  re- 
specting any  errors  into  which  he  might  have  fallen  from  any  German  bishop 
whom  the  pope  might  appoint  for  that  purpose ;  that  he  would  publish  let- 
ters in  which  he  would  admonish  all  persons  to  be  obedient  and  respectful  to 
the  Roman  Church ;  and  finaUy,  that  he  would  write  to  the  pope,  and  assure 
the  Holy  Father,  that  although  he  had  been  unduly  severe  in  some  of  his 
writings,  he  had  never  thought  of  infringing  upon  the  privileges  of  the  Ro- 
man Church,  (d)  Accordingly  he  indited  the  promised  letter,  in  which  his 
language  was  fbll  of  expressions  of  humility,  and  the  Roman  Church  was 
exalted  above  every  thing  but  Christ  himself,  (e) 

§  812.     The  Disputation  at  Leipsic.    June  27-July  16,  1519. 

Aeto  coHoq.  Lptt  in  Ldtcher  toI.  IIL  p.  203s^     If'alch  voL  XV.  p.  9&4m.    Lutk.  Acooant  in  De 
W€Ue  vol  I.  Ik  284.  290m.  807sa.    Melancth,  Account  in  Cof^p.  R«f,  vol  L  p.  S1sa.—J.  G.  Stickel^  do 
tI,  qium  oolloq.  Lipai  habnerit  ftd  promoT.  refbnn.  Jen.  1827.  C  G.  Ilering^  de  disp.  Lipsiao  a.  1519. 
iMbita.  Lp&  1889.    J.  K.  Seidemann,  d.  Lpz.  Disp.  Dnad.  ISia 

Luther  had  already  agreed  in  Augsburg  with  his  learned  friend,  Dr. 
(Mayr  von)  Eck  of  Ingolstadt,  that  the  controversy  of  the  latter  with  Carl- 
stadt  (Andr.  Bodenstein)  should  be  decided  by  a  disputation.  But  in  the 
polemical  writings  sent  forth  by  Eck,  Luther  perceived  that  he  was  himself 
the  object  of  this  treacherous  attack,  and  he  therefore  deemed  it  indispensa- 
ble that  he  also  should  take  part  in  the  debate,  (a)    The  apprehensions  of 


c)  Gomp.  his  Letters  to  Dake  John,  1520-28*  in  Forstemann''s  new  Urktindenb.  toL  L  p.  Iss. 

d)  Ldtcher  vol.  I.  p.  552881  vol.  III.  p.  6a«.  820s8.  De  Wetts  vol  L  p.  Wlae.'-Seidemann^  K.  v 
Ifilt  Ghronolog.  Untera.  Dresd.  1841.  H  E.  Apel^  quae  C  Milt  o.  Luth.  Altenb.  egerlt  Alt 
18588.  2  P.  4 

«)  2>tf  WeUs  vol  L  p.  288ss. 

a)  Eoeii  ObellscL  Lntheri  AsterisoL  {Ldfihtr  voL  XL  pi  888aa.) 


i 


366  MODERN  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  Y.    A.  D.  UUT-ieia. 

those  who  shrank  from  the  now  agitation  were  allayed  by  their  confid< 
the  brilliant  talents  of  £ck,  (h)  and  the  disputation  was  held  before  a 
respectable  assembly  in  the  Pleissenburg  at  Ltip^ic,  At  its  oommeiM 
and  at  its  close,  Carhtadt  maintained  that  the  natural  man  is  totally 
to  perform  any  thing  good,  and  that  even  in  a  state  of  grace  no  aoticHi 
be  meritorious.  (<*)  lie  had  Augustine,  and  Eck  had  the  ancient  fathers  \ 
the  scholastic  writers  in  his  favor,  but  both  of  them  appealed  to  the 
tures.  In  his  theses,  Eck  had  ventured  upon  the  assertion,  that  even 
the  time  of  Sylvester  the  Roman  Church  held  rank  above  all  other  ohi 
and  that  whoever  was  in  possession  of  the  chair  and  the  faith  of  St. 
was  always  recognized  as  Petcr^s  successor  and  the  universal  vicar  of  < 
This  declaration  was  assailed  by  Luther^  and  the  controversy  wai 
pressed  to  the  assertion  that  the  pope  was  not  by  divine  right  the  nn 
bishop  of  the  Church.  Luther  adduced  arguments  for  this  position  fr<c 
Scriptures  and  from  history,  but  Eck  threw  upon  him  the  reproach  oi 
ing  to  a  Hussite  heresy,  and  urged  him  to  express  a  doubt  of  the  inM 
of  councils.  The  glory  of  a  victory  was  not  indeed  obtained  by  Lut 
this  contest,  but  the  controversy  had  now  become  universal,  and  I 
finally  freed  from  all  feelings  of  sacred  awe  with  respect  to  the  1 
Church,  now  saw  with  astonishment  that  the  truth  had  been  ntterei 
before  his  time,  and  that  all  the  spirits  of  opposition  had  become  oo 
within  his  bosom. 

§  318.    Melancihon,     General  Affairn, 

T.  Opp.  Bas.  15410A.  6  vols.  rec.  Peueer^  Vlt  150288.  4  vols,  f  Selection  br  KUthe,  "Lpg, 
ToU  Couiplcte  vd.  begun  in  the  Corpos  Reforaiator.  ed.  BrtUchntiiier^  poet  Bretech.  J 
UaL  et  Brunsu.  1884-J^  10  vula.  4.  Camerari%f^  de  Pb.  M.  orta,  totius  vltae  cnrria  et  hm 
nUa  Lps  156fi.  ed.  Strohtl,  IlaJ.  1777.    AugusU,  Vrat  1S17. 

II.  Old  Lit  in  StrohfVs  ed.  of  Camerar.  8.  56988.  A.  U.  Kiemeyer^  M.  als  Praeceptor 
niae.  lial.  Ibl7.  J/.  Fuciutt,  M.  Lcben  a.  CharacUristik.  Lpa.  1S81  L>  F,  Ueyd^  M.  v.  Ti 
TQb.  1889.  F  GalU,  Chnractcristik  M.  ala  Theologen  a.  EntvickL  &  Lehrbegr.  HaL  IBIft 
Matthew  M.  K  I^bei)  u.  Wirkcn.  Altenb.  1S41.  {F.  A.  Onm,  Life  of  P.  MeL  fh>in  a  L 
Host  1885.  12.] 

A  young  man  accompanied  Luther  to  Leipsic,  who  brought  to  the 
the  Reformation  vast  treasures  of  learning,  and  the  scientific  repntati 
the  second  humanist  of  his  age.  This  was  Philip  Melancihon^  the  i 
George  Schwartzerd,  a  skilful  armorer,  at  Bretten,  in  the  Palatinate 
Rhine,  where  he  was  bom  Feb.  16,  1497.  His  great-uncle  Renchli 
much  delighted  with  the  early  development  of  his  precocious  mind, 
ing  finished  his  preparatory  studies  at  Pforzheim  and  Hcidelburg,  after 
he  passed  through  the  whole  course  of  the  sciences  taught  at  TubiDgeo 
lished  his  Greek  Grammar  in  1618,  and  after  1514  gave  lectures  as  a  1 
of  Arts  upon  the  classics  and  the  original  philosophy  of  Aristotle.  S 
no  sooner  called  to  Wittenberg  than  he  declared  that  the  course  of  in 
tion  for  youth  must  be  improved  (Aug.  29,  1518),  and  gave  to  it  a  homj 
Greek  tendency.    He  soon  became  intimate  with  Luther,  not  only  <m  ac 


h)  Eccii  Epp.  Ep.  de  rat  studlor  raor.  Ingol  1548.  4.  {StrobO,  Mlac  H.  IIL  p.  Mn.) 
mund^  ernea.  Andcnken.  vol.  L  p.  251fls. 

c)  A.  O.  JHscthqf^  de  Carolst  Lath,  do  senro  arblt  doctrinae  defenaore.  QoCt.  ISOQl 


CHAP.  L  BEFOBMATION.  JSia  MELANCTHON.  $814  HUTT£N.     367 

of  the  high  esteem  which  both  felt  for  each  other,  but  because  both  were 
with  equal  zeal  laboring  to  explain  and  establish  the  authority  of  the  Scrip- 
tures, against  which  nothing  was  looked  upon  as  of  any  avail.    Ho  was  gen- 
tle only  when  compared  with  Luther,  for  he  was  really  impetuous  and  easily 
excited.    He  was  timid  and  sometimes  yielding  from  his  anxiety  lest  in  the 
excitement  of  controversy  Christianity  itself  should  be  lost  sight  of,  (a)  and 
l>eoAiiBe  he  could  make  proper  allowance  for  the  position  of  an  opponent, 
irhile  Luther  dashed  onward  to  his  conquests  without  looking  to  the  right  or 
Co  the  left.    He  had  more  learning  and  eloquence,  but  less  strength  of  char- 
acter, less  depth  of  feeling,  and  less  creative  enthusiasm  than  Luther.    The 
pontion  which  he  assumed,  and  which  nature  seemed  to  have  designed  for 
2iiin  with  respect  to  Luther,  was  that  of  a  trusty  counsellor  and  assistant. 
TEhere  were  seasons  when  he  felt  lonely  in  Saxony,  (b)  and  was  wounded  by 
XiQther,  but  there  was  something  in  the  latter  which  he  reverenced  as  almost 
^iTine,  and  iw^ich  he  never  ventured  to  restrain,  (c)    Although  he  was  oon- 
Aflsedly  the  first  among  the  theologians  of  his  party,  he  often  betook  himself 
Amdly  to  his  classics,  and  Luther  found  it  necessary  to  hold  him  firmly  to  his 
dieologtoal  Lectures,  (d)    The  division  of  the  Church  produced  a  pang  of  the 
intense  grief  in  his  guileless  spirit,  (e) 


{  814.    Appeal  to  the  Christian  Nobility  of  the  German  Nation. 

The  German  knighthood  formed  a  kind  of  third  estate,  which  took  rank 
iT  the  princes  and  the  bishops,  and  was  determined  to  maintain  freedom 
for  themselves,  if  not  for  the  common  people.    At  the  head  of  this  order  in 
respect  to  power  at  that  time,  stood  Francis  of  Sichingen  (d.  1523),  a  man 
"Violent  in  assault,  but  a  shield  to  all  who  were  oppressed,  (a)    In  respect  to 
intellectnal  influence,  however,  no  one  was  superior  to  Ulrich  of  Hutteii  (d. 
1528),  the  knight  that  never  rested,  that  never  hesitated  to  oppose  every 
form  of  injustice,  and  long  before  Luther ^s  appearance  had  boldly  attacked 
popes  and  monks  with  his  utmost  satirical  power.    This  bold  knight  now 
gave  his  hand  for  the  assistance  of  Luther  in  the  great  contest  with  the  king- 
dom of  Antichrist,  believing  that  in  doing  so  he  was  struggling  for  the  lib- 
erty of  Germany.  (6)     It  was  to  the  German  nobles,  many  of  whom  offered 
other  an  asylum  or  their  swords  to  the  reformer,  as  the  genuine  representa- 
tives of  his  people,  that  Luther  addressed  his  pamphlet  on  the  improvement  of 
CAiriitiaii  morality,  (e)  In  the  introduction  he  pointed  out  how  the  Romanists 
1^  intrenched  themselves  against  the  Reformation  within  three  walls :  Threat- 
«  Aem  with  the  secular  power,  they  cry  out,  "  The  spiritual  power  is  supe- 
nor!  ^    Ply  them  with  arguments  from  the  Scriptures,  they  exclaim,  "  The 

^  0»rp.  Rtf.  ToL  L  p.  898.  »ia        t)  Jh.  vol.  I.  p.  859. 

^  /ft.  ToL  I.  pc  211.       d)  lb,  p.  606c  677.    IJ€  WetU  vol  II.  ^  60a 

^  Corp.  JUf.  Tol.  L  p.  1110. 
J*)  ^vft.  LeodU  L.  de  reb.  gesUs  et  calamitow  oblta  Fr.  de  Sick.  {Freher  vol.  IIL  p.  295).    JC 
**•«*»  ft.  T.  8.  Stnttg.  182788.  8  yola. 

^  *)  Werke  ed.  bj  Afiinc\  Brl  182188.  5  vols.  Selection  and  Trans.  Lpa.  19228.  S  vols.^!.  8ehi^ 
*^U-T.H.  Lpa.1791.  iraAnUM%  Jagendiehen  H.  Orelftw.  1816.  Wafferueil,  U.  v.  H.  NQrnlk 
^  £  «.  Bruniuno,  U.  v.  H.  1842a.  2  vols.    Ck>inp.  Uist.  poL  BL  1889.  roL  lY.  H.  58.  88. 

c)Aq^16M.    In  iraioAToLZ.p.296011 


368  MODERN  CHUBCH  UISTOBT.    FEB.  Y.    A.  D.  1017-lftl8. 

pope  alone  can  explain  the  word  of  God ! "  Appeal  to  a  general  ooondl,  and 
they  reply,  ^*  None  but  the  pope  can  sammon  or  preside  over  it  I  *'  He  then 
proceeded  to  break  through  these  walls  with  the  assertion  that  every  real 
Christian  belonged  to  the  spiritual  order,  and  appealed  to  the  great  body  of 
Christians  as  the  real  sovereigns  in  each  congregation,  to  whom  he  pree^ited 
the  articles  of  the  reformation,  for  which  they  should  contend  as  for  a  na- 
tional interest.  These  were :  The  reduction  of  the  luxuriant  eztravaganoe 
of  the  papal  court,  security  against  the  gradual  exhaustion  of  the  German 
people  by  Roman  avarice,  the  independent  appointment  of  Grermans  to  eode- 
siasticol  otiices  in  Germany,  the  final  decision  of  all  trials  before  Grerman 
courts,  the  abolition  of  the  servile  oaths  which  bishops  were  required  to 
receive,  the  surrender  of  all  secular  power  then  held  by  the  pope,  so  £ar  as 
it  was  founded  ui)on  pretended  donations  and  usurpations,  the  limitation  of 
the  orders  of  mendicant  friars,  the  restoration  of  the  convents  to  their  origi- 
nal design  as  simple  Christian  schools,  the  abolition  of  oompnlsory  oelihaey, 
reconciliation  with  the  Bohemians  on  reasonable  conditions,  the  abrogation 
of  the  canonical  law,  tlie  discontinuance  of  the  idolatrous  homage  generally 
paid  to  Aristotle,  and  of  the  worship  of  the  saints,  and  finally  the  improve- 
ment of  the  course  of  acadoniic  studies  and  of  popular  education.  With  the 
grief  of  a  Christian  and  the  indignation  of  a  German  heart,  the  pope  was 
here  called  to  account  for  teaching  by  his  indulgences  a  noble  and  sincere 
nation  to  practise  deception  and  perjury,  and  the  Germans  are  exhorted  to 
hunt  out  all  papal  messengers  with  their  merchandise,  and  expel  them  from 
the  country.  Indeed,  this  pamphlet  was  a  public  disruption  from  Roi^e,  and 
a  general  summons  to  the  nation  to  do  the  same.  With  terrible  eloquence 
the  national  feeling  was  aroused  by  a  relentless  exposure  of  all  those  indigni- 
ties which  had  been  endured  for  centuries  with  a  German  good  nature,  but 
which  had  only  provoked  derision  at  Rome.  Tlie  revolutionary  character  of 
the  reformation  was  decided  by  this  little  work.  Luther,  however,  in  the 
most  absolute  manner  declined  all  offers  of  the  sword  which  were  made  to 
him  by  the  knights.  As  the  world  had  been  created  and  the  Church  had 
been  originally  established  by  the  word  of  God,  he  had  no  doubt  that  a 
restoration  of  the  Church  could  be  effected  by  the  same  means,  (d) 

§  816.     The  Babylonian  Captivity  and  Christian  Freedom, 

Luther^s  army  was  his  ever  fresh  and  always  interesting  writings,  and 
these  he  sent  forth  with  a  rapid  development  of  mental  power.  The  book 
which  he  called  the  Babylonian  Captivity  of  the  Church  (a)  oommeneea  with  an 
expression  of  thanks  to  his  opponents  for  assisting  him  so  much  in  his  attain- 
ment of  truth,  and  an  announcement  that  he  must  now  reject  what  he  had 
in  the  beginning  of  the  controversy  conceded.  In  the  course  of  the  debate 
it  had  become  evident  to  him  that  indulgences  were  nothing  but  a  roguish 
trick  of  Roman  sycophants,  that  the  papacy  itself  was  not  even  a  human,  but 
a  devilish  institution,  that  the  cup  in  the  sacrament  belonged  to  tbe  pec^le, 

d)  Seekend.  I.  $  Sa  p.  19a 

a)  Oct  e,  1620.    Opp^  Jen.  Tom.  II.  p.  2fiOBi.    Wakk  tqL  XIX.  p^  Vm, 


CHAP.  I.  BEFORMATiON.  S  815.  LUTHER  ON  CHB.  FBE£D03£.     369 

that  the  mass  was  not  a  sacriiice  nor  a  good  work,  and  that  the  newlj-dis- 
oorered  doctrine  of  transubstautiation,  or  any  view  which  asserted  a  real 
connection  between  the  consecrated  bread  and  the  divine  body,  was  not  ne- 
cessary to  faith.  The  only  sacraments  allowed  to  be  of  divine  institution 
were  baptism,  penance,  and  the  Lord^s  Sapper.  In  opposition  to  a  reliance 
npon  the  ontward  Church  and  its  forms,  he  introduced  the  doctrine  of  the 
saring  power  of  faith  alone.  Ohristian  liberty,  therefore,  ought  not  to  be 
fettered  by  any  statutes  and  arbitrary  vows  like  those  which  required  fast- 
ings, donations,  pilgrimages,  and  monasticism.  This  declaration  he  said  might 
be  considered  as  a  part  of  the  recantation  which  had  been  demanded  of  him. 
And  yet,  at  an  interview  with  Miltitz  at  Lichtenburg  (Oct.  12,  1520),  Luther 
once  more  allowed  himself  to  imagine  that  a  reconciliation  was  possible,  (/>)  and 
that  he  might  lay  a  foundation  for  it,  he  wrote  a  treatise  on  Christian  Free- 
dom, in  the  spirit  of  the  old  mystics,  exalted  above  the  pending  controversy, 
but  with  the  whole  reformation  in  his  heart,  (c)  A  Christian  man  was  repro- 
BMited  as  a  free  lord  of  all  things  by  a  faith  which  commits  his  soul  to  Christ, 
and  as  a  king  and  priest,  subject  to  no  law  and  dependent  upon  nothing  ex- 
ternal. And  yet  this  Christian  man  was  a  servant  of  all  things,  since  from  a 
regard  to  the  divine  will  he  endeavored  to  be  nseflil  to  all  around  him. 
From  kindness  of  heart,  and  not  as  a  matter  necessary  to  piety  or  salvation, 
be  might  even  comply  with  the  innumerable  mandates  of  the  pope,  just  as 
]iary  confbrmed  to  the  custom  of  purification,  as  Paul  circumcised  Timothy, 
and  as  Christ  paid  tribute.  Such  was  the  discourse  which  Luther  sent  to  Leo 
X.,  aceompanied  with  a  letter  (d)  toll  of  expressions  of  personal  regard,  but 
with  sentiments  of  a  lofty  self-respect.  He  at  the  same  timu  exhorted  Leo, 
18  St.  Bernard  once  did  his  Eugenius,  to  remember  that  he  was  as  a  lamb  in 
the  midst  of  wolves,  or  as  Daniel  sitting  among  the  hons,  and  to  avoid  the 
citastrophe  which  could  not  much  longer  be  delayed,  by  a  reformation  of  his 
infected  coiu*t  and  of  the  general  Church.  The  noble  Medici  was  delighted 
lith  the  fine  talents  displayed  by  brother  Martin,  but  was  disposed  to  regard 
^  whole  controversy  as  a  mere  quarrel  among  the  monks,  (e) 

§  316.     The  Fire  Signal 

The  opinion,  however,  prevailed  at  Rome,  that  this  perilous  controversy 
could  be  annihilated  by  a  sudden  blow,  (a)  A  bull  was  issued  on  June  16, 
1S20,  in  which  forty-one  propositions  taken  from  Luther^s  writings  were  oon- 
^ned,  his  works  were  ordered  to  be  burned  wherever  they  were  found, 
ttd  he  himself  was  excommunicated  unless  he  recanted  within  sixty  days, 
^  which  every  Christian  magistrate  was  required  to  imprison  him  and 


^)  Ih  WetU  ToL  I.  p.  490.    J.  Q.  Droyun^  Ref  Oesch.  (Zeltsch.  t  tb&r.  Oe8cb.  1858.  E.  2.) 

^  De  libertftte  cbr.  Yit  1520.  4.  (0pp.  Jen.  Tb.  L  p.  64(1)  Yon  Freiheit  eines  CbrUtenmenscben. 
^  IBM.  4.  (  Waleh  vol.  XIX.  p.  1206.) 

^  Alter  Oct  1&  dated  back  to  Sept  6, 1520.  Ep.  Lutberiana  ad  Leo  X.  Witt  1020.  4  pablished 
"^^auM  time  in  German.    D€  WeUe  vol  I.  p.  49788. 

*)  AAcr  Bandelli  Oerde*^  H.  Er.  ren.  vol  L  p.  205. 

^)  Ulcrie  cujundatn  (Pirckbclmer)  e  Roma.  {Ri^derer^  Nacbrr.  s.  K.  Gel.  a.  B&chergesch. 
^  IT<i  T«L  L  pu  179HL)    Sarpi,  H.  Cono.  Trld.  roL  L  p.  158.    FaUavie.  H.  Cone  Trid.  I,  sa 

24 


370  MODERN  CUUBCH  HISTOBY.    PER.  Y.    A.  D.  1617-164& 

deUver  him  at  Rome,  (b)  This  bull  was  brought  to  Germany  by  Eok  as  a 
token  of  his  victory.  The  heart  of  Luther  now  became  strong  as  he  saw 
that  the  die  was  cast,  and  he  no  longer  doubted  that  the  pope  was  antichrist. 
His  works  were  burned  in  Mentz,  Cologne,  and  Louvain,  but  in  many  cities 
those  who  endeavored  to  execute  the  bull  met  with  severe  abuse,  and  in  the 
electorate  of  Saxony,  in  accordance  with  the  precedent  g^ven  by  the  Univer- 
sity, it  was  rejected,  (e)  Luther  published  a  pamphlet  in  opposition  to  this 
bull  of  Antichrist,  renewed  his  appeal  from  the  pope  as  from  an  obdurate 
heretic  to  an  independent  Christian  council,  {(t)  and  on  the  10th  Dec.,  1620, 
at  the  head  of  a  procession  of  students,  he  went  out  of  the  city  by  the 
Elster-gate,  and  threw  the  bull,  together  with  the  book  of  the  canon  law, 
into  the  flames.  At  the  same  time  he  offered  up  thanks  for  the  burning  of 
his  own  writings,  and  declared  his  present  act  the  fire-signal  of  bis  irrevoca- 
ble renunciation  of  the  papacy.  Other  books  of  his  opponents  were  also 
committed  to  the  same  flames  by  other  hands,  (e) 

§  817.    Political  Belations  until  1621. 

In  the  legal  condition  in  which  the  German  empire  then  was,  common 
measures  either  fbr  good  or  for  evil  Were  equaUy  difiScult  The  chivalrous 
emperor  Maximilian^  that  he  might  effect  a  reformation,  had  at  one  time 
seriously  entertained  the  strange  idek  of  becoming  a  pope  himself,  (ft)  It 
was  not  therefore  consistent  for  him  to  attempt  any  thing  rashly  against  one 
who  was  contending  against  Roman  abuses.  After  his  death  (JaiL  12th, 
1619),  nothing  of  a  violent  nature  could  be  undertaken  against  LuthCT  while 
the  elector  of  Saxony  was  the  imperial  regent  in  Lower  Germany.  Charla 
I,  and  Francis  I.  were  candidates  for  the  German  crown.  The  influence  of 
the  pope  was  secretly  opposed  to  France,  and  as  long  as  he  had  hope  of  suc- 
cess he  openly  protested  against  Spain.  Frederic  the  Wise  declined  accept- 
ing the  crown  when  it  was  offered  to  him,  on  the  ground  that  the  power  of 
his  house  was  insufficient  to  maintain  it.  It  was  principally  through  his 
influence  that  Charles  was  elected.  The  Emperor  Charles  V.,  on  his  way  to 
his  first  Diet  at  Worms,  was  saluted  with  splendid  promises  if  he  would  in 
the  spirit  of  the  German  people  place  himself  at  the  head  of  the  movement 
for  the  establishment  of  a  national  Church.  His  mind,  however,  was  now 
occupied  with  preparations  to  contend  with  Francis  I.  for  the  sovereignty  of 
Italy.  The  natural  policy  of  the  pope  with  respect  to  this  contest  was  openly 
to  attach  himself  to  the  party  of  him  who  might  for  the  time  be  victorious, 
and  yet  secretly  to  support  the  vanquished.  The  conduct  of  the  emperor 
with  regard  to  Luther  depended  very  much  upon  his  interest  and  policy  in 
this  struggle.  Just  as  he  was  about  to  form  an  alliance  with  the  pope,  whose 
assistance  he  needed  in  Spain,  he  was  compelled  to  pay  deference  to  the  feel- 


h)  Exsarge  Domine :  Ballanini  ampl  Col.  ed.  Coqwi^  P.  III.  toL  IIL  p.  487m.    With  EuUm^m 
Anm.  In  WaU-h  vol.  XY.  p.  189108. 

c)  RUderery  Geech.  der  darch  Pnblic.  d.  Bulle  ge^ren  Lnth.  erregten  anraben.  Altd.  «.  Nftrab^ 

me.  4 

d)  Walch  vol  XV.  p.  1782BflL  IOOOm.       e)  lb.  p.  1926aa. 

a)  Sal  Cyprian,  de  Max.  I.  Ponttfleatam  M.  affoctante.  (Dm.  TirU.  aif.  Co1».  ITSSw  A.) 


CHAP.  L    BEFOBMATION.    |  818.  DIET  AT  WOBMS.  371 

fngs  of  Frederic  the  Wise,  who  continaally  demanded  that  Luther  should 
be  tried  before  an  impartial  tribanal.  Hence  even  a  second  bnll  of  excom- 
munication issaed  against  Luther  (Jan.  8d,  1521),  the  object  of  which  was  to 
deprive  him  and  his  followers,  reproachfliUy  called  Lutherans,  of  all  the 
privileges  of  men  and  Christians,  produced  no  effect  whatever,  (b)  Spalati- 
Rtfjt,  the  learned  and  sincere  friend  of  the  elector  as  well  as  of  Luther,  (c)  at 
the  request  of  his  master  made  every  effort  to  moderate  the  rapidity  of  Lu- 
ther's course.  The  attempt,  however,  was  without  success,  and  the  reformer 
only  asked  that  his  sovereign  would  allow  him  to  proceed  at  his  own  peril, 
as  he  had  no  fear  that  the  power  of  God  would  be  impeded. 

§  818.     The  nut  at  Worms,  1521. 

L  Aete  Latberi  In  oooiltiU  Wormat  ed.  PotticaHut^  Vit  1546.  (0pp.  Jen.  vol  IL  p.  i860.) 
Walek  ToL  XV.  p.  20S28S.  vol.  XX I L  p.  8026a.  FdrOemann^  new  Urkandenb.  vol.  L  p.  278flb 
SpataHn.  Ann.  p.  SSas.  SfHdan.  I.  IlL  p.  Z\B6.—Cochlaeus  (CoL  1668.)  pi  ftSsa.  Tarody :  Passlo 
Kurtini  Luth.  eecand.  Maroellum.  {Gerdetii  Munam.  vol.  IL  N.  5.) 

IL  Buy0,  L.  L  Wonna.  HaL  (1817.)  1824  Zimmer,  L.  i.  W.  Heidelb.  182L— .y<miM<for,  Wieder- 
crinn.  an  L.  u.  d.  Be£  Mainz.  1821. 

The  legate  Aleander  demanded  of  the  states  of  the  empire  at  Worms, 
that  in  order  to  carry  out  effectually  the  papal  excommunication,  Luther 
diould  be  placed  under  the  ban  of  the  empire.    The  demand,  however,  that 
he  should  be  condemned  without  a  hearing,  was  regarded  as  inconsistent 
with  German  usage.    The  states  made  a  distinction  between  the  opinions 
which  he  entertained  respecting  the  constitution  of  the  Church  and  those 
which  were  opposed  to  the  £uth  of  their  ancestors.    With  regard  to  the 
former,  they  were  disposed  to  deal  very  leniently  with  him  even  if  he  should 
nAise  to  retract  what  he  had  published,  but  with  regard  to  the  latter  they 
were  wUling  to  take  his  case  into  consideration,  (a)    On  receiving  a  citation 
tnd  a  pledge  of  safe  conduct  from  the  emperor,  Luther  came  to  Worms, 
Aeogh  he  regarded  his  situation  much  like  that  of  Huss  at  Constance.    On 
the  17th  and  18th  of  April  he  stood  before  the  emperor  and  the  imperial 
^et    At  the  dose  of  a  discreet  defence,  in  which  he  showed  wliy  he  could 
Bot  retract  what  he  had  written,  either  with  respect  to  the  word  of  God  in 
the  Holy  Scriptures,  or  against  the  ungodly  conduct  of  the  i)ope,  or  yet 
ifUDst  the  wicked  advocates  of  the  pope,  his  last  words  were,  ^^  Unless  I  am 
nloted  and  convinced  by  proofs  from  the  Holy  Scriptures,  or  by  plain,  lucid, 
nd  evident  argument,  I  yield  my  faith  neither  to  the  pope  nor  to  the  coun- 
oh  ilone,  for  it  is  clear  as  the  day  that  they  have  frequently  erred  and  oon- 
tndicted  each  other.    Until  so  convinced,  I  can  and  will  retract  nothing,  for 
Hiineith^safe  nor  expedient  to  act  against  conscience.    Here  I  stand,  I 
^  do  nothing  else ;  God  help  me !     Amen."    In  subsequent  communica- 
tions with  a  committee  of  the  princes,  when  it  was  proposed  that  he  should 
intnist  his  cause  to  the  diet  or  to  a  council,  he  remained  constant  to  his 

^)  ttaynald.  ad  a.  1A2L  N.  laa.     Walch  vol  XV.  p.  9080. 

^)  Spal.  biat  NachlaUL  n.  Bricfef  ed.  began  by  Ke\uUck«r  and  L.  Pr4lUr^  1.  vol  Jena.  1861. 
4*11*  a.  6.)    WagMr^  O.  SpaL  Altenb.  1880.    Perihel,  O.  Bp.  in  emend.  faerK.  merlta.  Jena.  1840. 
«)Aaii4v  vol  Lpc  876a. 


372  MODERN  CHUBCH  HIBTORT.    PER.  Y.    A.  D.  151T-lMa 

avowal  that  he  oonld  yield  to  nothing  bat  the  Holy  Scriptnres  or  to  reasoii- 
able  argument,  and  since  the  cause  in  which  he  was  engaged  was  not  bis 
own,  bnt  the  cause  of  God,  he  could  not  commit  it  to  the  hands  even  of  bia 
dearest  friends,  (b)  The  promise  of  the  emperor  to  afford  him  a  safe  conduct 
was  sacredly  fulfilled.  On  the  26th  of  May,  when  many  of  the  states  had 
left  the  diet,  sentence  was  pronounced  against  Luther  and  all  his  adherents, 
and  permission  was  given  to  any  one  to  assault  their  persons  and  seize  upon 
their  property,  (c)  But  Luther's  heroic  confession  had  won  the  hearts  of  the 
people  more  than  ever  to  himself,  and  the  very  members  of  the  diet  who 
condemned  him  in  compliance  with  the  requirements  of  law,  presented  to 
the  same  assembly  101  articles  of  complaint  against  the  Roman  See.  (d) 

§  819.     The  Wariburg,  and  the  Tumult  at  Wittenberg,  1521, 1522. 

2>0  WeUe  vol.  L  Um.—AuguMni  AnUmii  Da.  de  Patmo  Lath.  Hal  1696.  and  oftes.    a 
KbhUr,  Lath.  a.  d.  Wiirtburg.  ElMn.  179S.  4. 

On  the  4th  of  May,  while  Luther  was  on  his  journey  homewards,  he  was 
seized  by  a  company  of  horsemen,  who,  according  to  a  previous  understand- 
ing with  the  elector,  conveyed  him  to  the  fortress  of  the  Warthurg,  Here 
he  lived  under  the  name  of  Yonker  George,  often  sick,  depressed  in  spiritB, 
and  lamented  in  all  parts  of  Germany  as  lost.  The  bold  publications,  how- 
ever, which  he  sent  forth  from  his  retreat  until  after  the  middle  of  summer, 
against  the  necessity  of  auricular  confession,  masses  for  the  dead,  monastic 
vows,  and  the  new  idol  of  the  archbishop  of  Mentz,  gave  unequivocal  evi- 
dence that  Luther  was  still  alive.  The  Elector  Albert  of  Mentz  humbled 
himself  under  the  severe  reproof  administered  by  the  condemned  monk,  (a) 
Meanwhile,  the  brethren  of  his  order  connected  with  a  monastery  in  Witten- 
berg, shut  up  their  convent  and  abolislied  the  practice  of  private  masses.  A 
few  of  the  priests  renounced  celibacy  and  were  married,  (b)  On  Christmas 
day  the  Lord's  Supper  was  administered  by  CarUtadt  in  both  kinds  and  in 
the  German  language.  These  proceedings  were  approved  by  Luther  and 
tolerated  by  the  elector,  who  only  required  that  no  innovations  should  be 
introduced  until  all  had  become  united  and  satisfied  with  respect  to  them  by 
means  of  written  and  oral  discussions  and  sermons,  (e)  But  when  Oarlstadt 
proceeded  so  for  as  to  disturb  public  worship,  demohsh  the  images  of  the 
saints,  and  commit  other  wild  acts  of  violence,  and  when  prophets  came 
f^om  Ztoickau  with  menaces  according  to  their  caprice  against  Church,  and 
State,  and  Science,  Luther  could  no  longer  be  restrained  by  his  friends.  In 
the  beginning  of  March,  1522,  he  left  the  Warthurg,  amused  himself  in  the 
course  of  his  journey  with  his  knightly  incognito,  (d)  and  in  ^e  sublime 

h)  Hier.  r«AiM,  it  8.  Yerhandl.  m.  Lnthor,  ed.  by  Stidemann,  (Zeftscb.  £  bist  Th.  1851.  H.  1.) 
o)  Goldatt,  Gonstt  Imp.  vol  IL  p.  14888.     Walch  toI.  XT.  p.  22648.    Dated  back  to  Maj  a 

d)  Fate*  ToL  XV.  p.  2068. 

a)  De  Wette  voL  IL  p.  11288.     Walch  vol.  XIX.  p.  6668& 

h)  J.  <?.  Walter,  prima  gloria  Gerogamiae  restitntae  Lvtbevo  rindleata.  Keoet  ad.  Ol  1767.  4 
'VtMmmeyw  in  Stad.  u.  Krit  1881.  H.  1. 

e)  Corp.  B^.  yoL  L  p.  65a 

<i)  Heir.  Alman.  180&  p.  lltai    Berntt^  Jo.  KeMler,  genannt  Ahenuioi  &  6*0.  ISSl  pk.  Vm. 


CHAP.  I.    SEFOSMATIOK.    |82a  MEL.  LOOL    LUTH.  BIBLK  373 

calmDesB  of  one  who  felt  that  he  was  acting  by  divine  direction,  (e)  wrote  an 
heroic  letter  to  the  elector  from  Borne.  He  then  preached  daily  during  a 
whole  week  in  Wittenberg^  in  behalf  of  the  snpreme  power  and  liberty  of 
the  spirit,  in  those  immortal  words  of  Christian  mildness  by  which  he  won 
the  hearts  of  his  hearers  in  favor  of  a  peaceable  development  of  a  reforma- 
tion founded  upon  voluntary  conviction  and  the  evident  letter  of  the  sacred 
Soriptares.  (/) 

§  820.    System  of  Doctrines  and  the  Scriptures. 

The  scientific  representation  of  the  religions  principles  of  the  Reformation 
was  famished  by  Melanethon  in  his  Theology^  (a)  a  work  which  grew  ont  of  his 
Lectures  upon  the  Epistle  to  the  Romans.  It  had  its  origin  in  that  deep  con- 
sciousness of  human  impotence  on  account  of  sin,  which  is  exhibited  in  the 
Augustinian  doctrine  of  original  sin.  For  tliis  sin  of  the  human  race  Cl)rist  has 
made  complete  satisfaction  to  divine  justice.  Hence  salvation  is  to  be  found  in 
faith  alone,  i,  e,m  the  surrender  of  the  whole  spirit  to  Christ,  and  the  ordi- 
nances of  the  Church  and  all  kinds  of  works  are  profitable  only  so  feu*  as  they 
proceed  from  faith.  If  this  grand  but  simple  system  of  faith  was  sufficient 
to  vindicate  the  reformation  in  the  opinion  of  literary  men,  the  opposition 
of  the  Roman  Church  to  the  word  of  God  in  the  Scriptures  was  its  most  snc- 
oeasfiil  plea  in  the  minds  of  the  common  people.  In  his  solitude  in  the 
Wartburg,  Luther  had  translated  the  New  Testament  principally  from  the 
original  text  into  the  German  language.  After  revising  it  in  company  with 
Melanethon,  he  published  this  work  in  1522.  A  translation  of  each  of  the 
books  of  the  Old  Testament  afterwards  appeared,  in  composing  which  he 
Wis  assisted  by  the  counsel  of  hb  fHends.  It  displays  a  strong  prejudice  iu 
faTOT  of  that  which  had  before  been  regarded  as  the  true  rendering,  but  it  is 
no  less  distinguished  for  its  extreme  conscientiousness.  They  thus  succeeded, 
in  1634,  in  printing  the  whole  Sacred  Scriptures,  a  master-piece  of  the  Ger- 
man language  and  heart,  and  forming  the  basis  on  which  were  established 
the  Scriptural  phraseology  and  spirit  of  the  people  for  many  generations,  (h) 

§  821.     The  Diet  at  Nuremlerg,  1622,  1628. 

Wdteh  vol  XY.  p.  2504i8.    Baynald.  id  ann.  1582. 

The  emperor  was  busy  in  Spain  with  his  war  against  France,  his  brother, 
the  Archduke  Ferdinand,  was  threatened  by  the  Turks,  and  at  the  head  of 
^^  empire  stood  a  regency  chosen  by  the  states.  Tlie  execution  of  the  edict 
^  Worms  was  therefore  left  to  the  will  of  each  state.  Leo  was  succeeded 
V  Badrian  F/.,  an  honest  native  of  the  Netherlands,  who  had  been  edu- 
^M  m  the  scholastic  manner,  and  was  as  thoroughly  convinced  of  the  ne- 


•)  Ik  WdU  Tol  IL  p.  ISTsfl. 

/)raleAyol.  XX.i>.6«a. 

')  Lod  eommanee  rerarn  theoL  Wit  1521.  and  often.  Strobtl^  Yn.  e.  Uteratargeech.  von  MeL 
^  AHd.  n-  NOrnb.  (ITTAl)  1782. 

^)  Utt  edit  with  Luther's  eorreetlon9,  15M.— XuM.  Bendbr.  r.  Dollmetachen  der  n.  8.  ( Waleh 
^  ^L  pi  816a&)  MathsHu*,  18th  Pred.— Pan««r.  Oesch.  d.  BIbelQbere.  L.  Nbrnb.  (1788.)  1T9!. 
^<''^«iB«l».  d.  reL  Werth  d.  Btbeiabere.  L.  Bri.  1915.  IT.  Sohott,  QeMh.  d.  Bibelftberai  L.  Lp« 
^   0,  W.  Hopf^  WOrdlg.  d.  Loth.  BibeWerdaataeh.  NOrab.  18lT. 


I 


374  MODEBN  C11UBCH  HISTOBT.    PER.  Y.    A.  D.  151T-16I& 

oefBity  of  a  reformation  as  of  the  heretical  nature  of  Luther's  doctrines,  (a) 
Hence  his  legate  Ghieregati^  at  the  Diet  of  Nuremberg^  on  the  one  hand  de- 
manded that  the  edict  against  Luther  should  he  executed  as  though  it  were 
against  a  second  Mohammed,  and  suggested  that  the  insurrection  now 
directed  against  the  spiritual,  would  soon  he  turned  against  the  civil  mlers ; 
and  on  the  other,  acknowledged  the  necessity  of  a  reformation,  and  promised 
that  it  should  he  effected  in  a  lawful  manner  in  the  head  and  memherg  of  the 
Ohnrch.  Tlie  estates  fastened  upon  the  cecond  part  of  this  communica- 
tion, and  hastened  to  hring  forward  a  hundred  articles  of  complaint  agdnst 
the  papal  see.  (h)  It  was  owing  to  these  ahuses  they  declared  that  Luther 
possessed  such  power,  and  a  general  rehellion  would  therefore  he  the  prohahle 
consequence  of  any  yiolent  measures  for  his  destruction.  They  therefore  urged 
that  a  free  Christian  council  for  the  removal  of  these  grievances  shonhl  he 
held  within  a  year  in  some  German  city,  and  argued  that  until  it  might  be 
assembled  nothing  should  be  taught  but  the  pure  gospel,  with  mildness  and 
according  to  the  explanation  generally  received  by  the  Church.  Hadrian 
had  nothing  to  offer  at  this  turn  of  affairs  except  lamentations,  yet  he  was 
really  zealous  for  a  reformation,  and  actually  commenced  it  in  his  own  conrt. 
But  a  pope  who  was  obliged  to  regard  the  rights  and  wrongs  on  which  his 
own  power  was  based,  was  necessarily  more  inefficient  in  this  matter  than  a 
professor  who  had  nothing  to  think  of  but  eternal  truth  and  public  opinion. 

§  822.    Introduction  of  the  Befonnation, 

The  divine  power  which  attended  Luther  received  the  co-operation  of  the 
Humanists  with  all  their  worldly  wisdom,  and  the  Reformation  was  looked 
upon  as  a  struggle  for  the  liberty  of  Germany.  Its  opponents  were  ridiculed 
as  blockheads  or  threatened  as  traitors.  Even  the  imitative  arts  came  to  the 
assistance  of  the  struggling  Church,  (a)  The  Wittenberg  Nightingale  also 
now  announced  the  opening  of  spring,  (b)  and  all  the  liberal-minded  youth 
gave  in  their  adherence  to  the  new  party,  which,  however^  professed  to  he 
merely  returning  to  the  God  of  ancient  times,  (c)  From  the  success  of  the 
movement  the  princes  expected  the  forfeited  property  of  the  Church,  the 
priests  expected  wives,  and  the  people  freedom,  (d)  It  was,  however,  the 
pure  enthusiasm  of  Luther  and  the  introduction  of  a  new  form  of  the  Chris- 
tian spirit,  which  drew  these  favorable  influences  into  his  triumphal  march, 

a)  J.  F.  Suddeus^  do  Pontiff  R.  qui  ro£  (hxstra  tenUrnnt  Jen.  17ISL  4.  p.  299\    G.  Burmann^ 
Hadr.  VI.  Tn^.  ad  Bh.  1727.  4.    J.  T.  L.  DanM,  AnalecU  crit  da  Adr.  YI.  Jen.  1818s.  9  P.  4 

h)  Die  100  Beschwerden  d.  Deutachen  Nation,  m.  Anm.  r.  O,  M.  Web€r^  Frkl  1S89.  eompi 
Ranke  vol.  II.  p.  4068. 

a)  Watch  vol  XIY.  p.  2108S.  toI.  XT.  p^  98088.  Oeiman  Litany :  Walch  vol  XV.  p.  tVl9m. 
Caricatures:  SMd,  I  XVI.  p.  201.  Paliavio,  I,  8S.  8pUt€r,  pi  697.  Carniyal  pTaya:  !>•  Wetti 
vol.  I.  p.  661.  Mate  comedy :  Ma)ua^  YiU  BeuchL  Dorl.  1687.  p.  546a.  Papal  aaa  and  Munkh  calf: 
Walch  ToI.  XIX.  pw  2408.  J.  Voigt,  PasquiUe,  Spottlieder,  a.  Scbmib#cbr.  a.  d.  1.  lliUt<  d 
16.  Jahrh.  (i7aum«rV  hist  Taachenbuch.  188&  p.  8208a.)  Piper,  MythoL  d.  chr.  Kanst  toL  L 
p.  8168. 

h)  Hans  Sachs :  Wlttenb.  NaclitlgalL  1528.  Dlspntacion  zw.  e.  Chorberm  n.  e.  Schuhnaaoher. 
1624  4.—JR  J.  Kimmtl,  de  J.  Sacbsio,  qnantum  ad  rempabL  Christ.  Talaerit  reftaaiBndam.  Gar. 
1887. 

c)  Yom  altcn  o.  n&en  Oott,  Glaaben  n.  Ler.  1621.  4 

<f)  J.  MarXf  Unacben  d.  aelinellen  Yerbreit  d.  Bet  Maini  1881 


CHAP.  L    BEFOBMATION.    f8S9.  SAXONY.    HSSSfiL  375 

and  whiob  was  alone  able  to  shake  the  yet  colossal  power  of  Catholicism, 
without  exhansting  in  the  struggle  the  strength  to  form  a  new  ecclesiastical 
establishment.    The  introdnction  of  the  Reformation  in  particular  localities 
generally  took  place  in  the  following  manner :  some  individuals  in  the  con- 
gregation, by  means  of  Luther's  writings,  were  led  to  perceive  the  inconsis- 
tency of  the  existing  state  of  the  Church  with  genuine  Christianity ;  then 
some  preacher,  probably  an  Angustinian,  possibly  a  Franciscan  monk  of  the 
same  views,  would  draw  the  multitude  after  him ;  then  the  sacrifice  of  the 
mass  would  be  discontinued  in  spite  of  much  opposition  from  the  spiritual  or 
the  secular  anthorities,  and  finally,  divine  worship  in  the  language  of  the 
people  would  be  commenced,  with  a  strange  confusion,  at  first,  of  various 
usages.    The  people  were  seized  with  a  horror  of  the  papacy,  and  in  almost 
every  place  where  the  popular  will  prevailed,  as  in  the  imperial  cities,  the 
Reformation  was  triumphant    Instead  of  guiding  these  great  popular  move- 
ments, the  princes  wore  ratlier  borne  along  by  them.    Frederic  the  Wise  died 
(May  5,  1525)  trusting  to  the  grace  of  God  through  the  righteousness  of 
CJhrist.     His  brother  and  successor,  John  the  Constant^  a  mild  and  sincere 
mler,  was  devoted  with  all  his  heart  both  to  the  cause  and  to  the  person  of 
Luther.    Philip^  the  youtliful  Landgrave  of  Hesse,  after  the  Diet  of  Worms, 
joined  the  party  of  the  Reformation,  became  a  personal  friend  of  Melano- 
thoD,  and  declared  (1525)  that  he  would  rather  part  with  his  lands  and  sub- 
jects than  to  abandon  the  word  of  God.    As  a  leader  of  his  party  he  was 
crafty  but  at  the  same  time  upright,  fond  of  novelties,  a  pious  Christian,  and 
a  firm  friend  of  the  Bible,  but  either  independent  of  the  theologians,  or  with 
a  smgular  scrupulosity  bringing  them  to  his  terms,  Ml  of  confidence  not  only 
in  divine  aid,  but  in  the  worldly  means  by  which  a  spiritual  revolution  was 
to  be  effected,  intelligent,  and  in  his  best  days  powerful,  (e)    Li  Prussia^ 
irhere  the  German  order  was  already  despised,  the  gospel  entered  under  the 
most  favorable  circumstances.     George  of  Polentz^  Bishop  of  Samland,  hav- 
ing oondncted  himself  at  an  earlier  period  of  life  as  became  a  pious  priest  of 
noble  blood,  now  placed  himself  at  the  head  of  the  reforming  party,  and  on 
Christmas  day,  1523,  in  the  cathedral  at  KOnigsberg,  proclaimed  with  great 
joy  that  the  Saviour  had  been  once  more  born  for  his  people.    The  Grand 
Harter,  Albert  of  Brandenburg^  gave  to  all  princes  and  bishops  the  example 
of  a  saocessful  secession  from  the  Church  and  the  empire,  by  receiving  the 
bereditary  dukedom  of  Prussia  as  a  fief  from  the  Polish  crown  (1525).  (/)    In 
^  South,  the  Dukes  of  Bavaria,  in  consequence  of  the  spirit  whicli  prevailed 
itt  their  univeroity  at  Ingolstadt,  and  the  favor  of  the  pope,  enjoyed  nearly  all 
^«  political  advantages  of  the  Reformation,  and  formed  a  wall  of  defence 
fi»  the  old  faith,  {g)    In  the  North,  George^  Duke  of  Saxony^  was  personally 


^  CK  t.  Rommel,  Philipp.  d.  Grosnn.  Gieseen.  1880.  8  vote.  Nen«i  Beitrr.  z.  Gvsch.  PhiL  ed.  by 
^'"i^.  DiniMt  1842.  W.  Munscher,  Ge»ch.  d.  lies*,  red  K.  Cass.  1860.  F.  W.  ffunenkftrnp,  hess. 
^OmcIi.  im  Zeita.  d.  Ref.  Marb.  18S3.  vol.  L  Comp.  TheoL  BriofWechsel  zw.  Pbil.  v.  H.  n.  G«org  v. 
8«h*n.  (Zdtseh.  t  blrt.  Th.  1S40.  H.  2.) 

/)  CoDclones  sacne  G.  PolentK  ed.  A.  R.  GebHr,  Regiom.  lS48w  4.  J.  VoigU  BriefW.  d.  be- 
'^■Qt  Gelebrten  m.  Albrecht  v.  Pr.  KCnigsb.  1841.— ^A««<i,  de  prirois  sacror.  refurmauxribas  In 
^'^U.  Eeglom.  2  P.  1825  et  182T.    A.  Lambeck,  Gesch.  d.  Kef.  In  Weatpr.  Thorn.  186a 

i)  V.A.  Winter,  Geacb.  d.  er.  Lehn  In  n.  dorob  Baiarn.  MOneb.  ISOOi.  2  vda. 


376  MODEBN  CHUBCH  HIBTOBY.    PEB.  Y.    A.  Di  1617-4M& 

anzioTis  for  a  reformation,  bnt  one  which  should  be  founded  upon  old  oatho- 
lic  grounds,  and  conducted  by  the  legitimate  authorities,  and  not  by  a  dofo- 
tered  monk,  (h)  The  complete  accomplishment  of  the  Reformation  aome- 
times  occasioned  much  inconvenience  to  those  who  adhered  to  the  imcioit 
Ohurcb,  and  such  as  resided  in  conYents  especially  were  driven  forth  upon 
the  wide  world ;  but  in  general  the  Reformation  necessarily  triumphed  by 
the  power  of  an  unbiassed  conviction.  The  Catholic  Ohnroh,  on  the  other 
hand,  protected  all  its  established  possessions  not  only  by  calumnies  upon 
Luther^s  doctrines,  but  by  a  rigorous  censorship,  by  restraints  upon  literary 
investigations,  imprisonment,  banishment^  and  other  violent  measures.  Some 
were  even  deprived  of  life.  Luther  praised  the  liord  that  even  this  glory  of 
the  apostolic  Ohurch  was  now  restored  to  the  world,  (i) 

§  828.  Commencement  of  the  Division  in  Germany,  1524-1526. 

Clement  VII.  perceived  the  impending  danger  and  made  every  exertion 
to  avert  it.  At  the  Diet  of  Nuremberg  (1524)  his  legate,  Campeggio,  de- 
clared that  the  list  of  grievances  which  had  beeu  presented  was  regarded  at 
Rome  as  the  work  of  a  few  evil-minded  persons,  but  the  utmost  that  he  could 
obtain  was  the  promise  that  the  edict  of  Worms  should  be  executed  as  fi&r 
as  was  practicable  for  each  state  of  the  empire.  It  was  at  the  same  time 
decided  that  the  empire  itself  would  soon  after  at  a  diet  appointed  at  Speyer 
(Spire)  undertake  the  regulation  of  ecclesiastical  affairs,  (a)  The  legate  also 
succeeded  in  forming  at  Ratisbon  an  alliance  between  Ferdinand  of  Austria, 
the  Dukes  of  Bavaria  and  most  of  the  bishops  in  the  south  of  Grermany,  by 
the  terms  of  which  an  apparent  reformation  was  accepted  of  under  his 
sanction,  and  they  agreed  not  only  to  abolish  some  of  the  grossest  ecdeiuas- 
tioal  abuses,  but,  by  a  decree  of  July  6th,  1524,  to  exclude  the  Wittenberg 
Innovations  from  their  respective  countries,  and  sustain  each  other  in  every 
danger  which  might  result  from  such  a  course,  (b)  The  emperor  wrote  letters 
threatening  all  who  would  not  execute  the  edict  of  Worms,  and  forbade  the 
assembly  at  Speyer.  At  a  diet  held  at  Deseau  (June  26, 1525),  the  opponents 
of  the  Reformation  among  the  princes  of  Northern  Germany  also  consulted 
about  the  attitude  which  they  could  most  properly  assume  in  opposition  to 
the  Lutheran  heresy,  but  the  extent  of  the  danger  from  this  meeting  was 
much  exaggerated,  (c)  In  consequence  of  these  proceedings  the  Landgrave 
of  Hesse  and  the  Elector  of  Saxony  met  together  at  Grotha  and  pledged  them- 
selves to  assist  each  other  with  all  their  power  against  every  assault  on  ac- 
count of  the  word  of  God.    The  original  document  was  ratified  at  Torgau^ 

h)  A.  M,  SchvUze^  Oeorg  n.  Luth.  Lp«.  18S4.  L.  FUehm-,  H.  Georg,  Lnth.  il  d.  veijagtm  L»ip- 
siger.  Lps.  1880.    Seidmumn,  d,  R«r.  Zeit  in  Baehwn,  1617-<89.  Dreed.  1S4& 

€)  Walch  vol  XXL  p^  29m.  94s«.  178ae.  Rabut^  Hiat  d.  Heillg«n,  AoaerwftbltMi  GottM  Zeogen 
m  dtesen  nnsern  letzten  seytten.  Btraasb.  1664.  Term.  1671.  2  voU.  t  Act*  mtftymm,  qui  Irae  mto. 
in  OaIIU.  Germ.  AngL  Flaodria  et  Italia  oonaUns  dederaat  nomM  £▼.  Gen.  IBU.  BlBckH,  di*  Mir- 
tyrer  d.  ev.  K.  Narnb.  1S28. 

a)  FaUavio.  II,  10.     Walch,  yoL  XY.  p.  8«Maiw    Banks,  yoL  IL  pw  IXU. 

h)  Watch,  ToL  XV.  p.  2e9»HL  Strobel,  Misa  St  IL  p^  10980.  GoUUuk  ConaUtt  Inp^  toL  UL 
p.  48700. 

c)  D0  WftU,  vol  IIL  p.  82.    Seidmnann  d.  Dma,  BOndn.  (Zeltaeh.  £  Mat  Tli.  184T.  H.  4) 


CHAF.  1    KBFOBMATIQV.    $898.  TOBQAU.    fSMw  BETOT  YIIL  377 

Mtroh  4, 1626.)  (d)  This  confederation  was  soon  after  strengthened  by  the 
looeflBion  of  Lnneburg,  Anhalt,  Mansfcldt,  PranBia,  and  Magdebarg,  bnt  it 
alwftys  remained  rather  vacillating  and  nndetermined,  for  Luther  was  exoeed- 
ioi^  displeased  that  any  one  shonld  set  himself  in  opposition  to  tlie  emperor, 
or  think  of  defending  the  almighty  word  and  providence  of  God  by  carnal 
wMpona  and  worldly  policy,  {e) 

i  824.     The  King  and  the  Theologian. 

Henry  YIII,  of  England,  who  coveted  the  reputation  of  a  theologian  and 
an  ecclesiastical  knight,  either  wrote  or  cansed  to  be  written  in  his  name,  a 
defence  of  the  seven  sacraments,  (a)  in  the  coarse  of  which  he  even  impeached 
Luther's  sincerity.  So  highly  was  this  royal  production  extolled  at  Rome 
that  it  was  declared  that  no  one  could  have  composed  it  without  the  assist- 
ance of  the  Holy  Spirit,  and  it  was  placed  in  the  same  rank  with  the  writings 
of  St  Augostine.  But  Luther^  conscious  that  he  was  contending  for  a  Mon- 
ardh  in  whose  presence  all  earthly  sovereigns  must  stand  confounded,  hurled 
bia  words  of  wrath  at  the  King  of  England,  and  hesitated  not  to  call  the 
royal  disputant  a  liar  and  a  knave,  (b)  In  the  midst  of  such  a  storm  the  king 
floon  found  that  he  was  never  intended  for  a  theologian.  Some  years  after- 
wardSi  through  the  influence  of  the  Danish  king,  Luther  became  elated  with 
the  hope  that  Henry  might  be  induced  to  decide  in  favor  of  the  Beforma- 
ti<ML  He  therefore  became  so  regardless  of  his  manly  dignity  while  seeking 
only  the  interest  of  his  cause,  that  he  wrote  an  humble  apology  to  the  king, 
and  offered  to  recall  his  offensive  language.  Henry  made  use  of  this  letter 
publidy  to  mortify  Luther,  who  found  it  difiScult  to  regain  the  lofty  tone 
which  he  had  first  used  with  respect  to  the  scandalous  lampoon  of  the  King 
of  Enghind.  {c) 

§  825.     The  PeaeanW  War.    1524,  1525. 

I.  LttMitnrt  of  the  orig.  Doeaments :  ff.  «.  Aua»€99^  Anz.  t  Kande  d.  dt  Mittelalt  1888.  p.  SOU. 
Oollc«tioM:  Waiek,  toL  XYL  p.  6t&  toL  XXL  p.  149tiL  TVnCMl,  vol  IL  p.  831s«.  Kiipp^  NmU. 
▼itL  lY.  pi  m\m, 

IL  SuHoHm*,  Qewb.  d.  dt  BK.  BrL  179S.  J.  CK  Schmid,  BK.  (HalL  EncykL  vol  TIL) 
SArtibmr^  BuMbobah.  Frefb.  1825.  OecM^  Beltr.  x.  Oesch.  d.  BK.  in  d.  ichwub.  f^nk.  OrlncL 
HflOtr.  18801  WaoKtmutk^  d.  dt  BK.  Lps.  1884.  W.  Ummermann^  allg.  Oeecb.  d.  grosMn  BK. 
fltattjK.  18Al-a.  8  Tols.  a  Btgd,  z.  O«oh.  a.  B«nrtb.  d.  dt  BK.  (Allg.  MonAlscb.  t  Wise.  a.  LU.  18B8L 

The  conspiracy  of  the  nobility  against  the  spiritual  and  secular  princea, 
which  had  sought  to  strengthen  and  vindicate  itself  by  the  principles  of  the 
Reldrmation,  had  finally  been  put  down  by  the  overthrow  of  Sickingen.  (a) 
But  the  long  cherished  discontent  of  the  oppressed  peasantry  which  had  al- 
ready broken  forth  on  different  occasions,  (5)  took  occasion  from  a  misunder- 


^  BorfUdsr,  YIII,  i-8.       t)  Kapp.  toL  IL  p.  57186.    De  WeUt\  toI  IIL  ^  454aa.  6Mmi 
a)  AdMrtio  YIL  Bacrr.  adv.  LtUk,  Lond.  152L    Walcb.  vol  XIX.  p.  158. 
t)  OonCn  Henr.  B«^in  Martlnas  Lntb.  1588.    Walcb,  vol  XIX.  p^  895l 
c)  D€  ir«tte,  ToL  III  pw  8888.    Walcb,  toL  XIX.  p.  468flA. 

a)  Bommd.  toL  IIL  Abth.  L  p^  SSSaa.    Ranke^  toL  IL  p.  Slsa.  HUt  pol  BL  1888.  toL  TY. 
B.»-l& 

>)  Watkamulht  AafrUada  o.  Krlcge  d.  B.  im  MA.  (BMuners  hiit  Tuobenb.  1884) 


378  MODERN  CHUBCH  HIBTORT.    FEB.  Y.    A.  B.  VOl-tUL 

standing  of  some  sormons  on  Christian  liberty  and  the  powerfnl  popQhr 
movements  connected  with  the  Reformation,  to  rise  in  open  rebellion  agaioflt 
the  secular  and  spiritual  nobility,  that  they  might  secure  th^r  rights  as  Ghrii> 
tians  and  as  men.  This  took  place,  too,  at  a  time  in  which  an  evangelied 
preacher  condemned  not  only  all  loans  upon  interest,  and  the  poaseasion  d 
wealth,  but  the  owning  of  any  permanent  property  as  inconsiatent  with  Chris- 
tianity and  the  word  of  God.  (<*)  Its  first  appearance  was  in  Snabia  (16S4), 
but  soon  extended  to  Franconia,  and  along  the  Rhine  to  Thnringen  (1525). 
These  peasants  in  justification  of  their  course  appealed  to  their  12  Articles,  (<Q 
the  Scriptures,  and  the  writings  of  Dr.  Luther.  In  the  opinion  which  Jf«> 
lancthon  expressed,  the  articles  of  the  peasantry  were  condemned  withoot 
reserve,  and  the  people  were  enjoined  unconditionally  to  obey,  and  to  sabnut 
to  their  grievances  without  resistance,  (e)  But  Luther  had  a  heart  which 
sympathized  with  the  sufferings  of  the  people.  In  his  exhortations  to  peaoe 
he  acknowledges  that  most  of  their  articles  were  reasonable,  and  admonidMi 
the  princes  as  well  as  the  peasants  to  concede  whatever  was  equitable.  (/) 
But  when  the  latter  maintained  their  cause  with  fire  and  slanghter,  proceeded 
to  the  bold  design  of  completely  remodelling  the  government  of  the  empin, 
received  as  their  leaders  enthusiastic  persons  like  Thomas  Mumer^  who  in  the 
character  of  a  prophet  with  the  sword  of  Gideon,  and  In  the  terrific  langiugs 
of  the  Old  Testament  proclaimed  universal  equality  ;  when  they  introdooed  i 
community  of  goods  and  published  abusive  libels  upon  what  they  called  (he 
nnspiritual  and  luxurious  carnality  of  the  people  of  Wittenberg,  (^)  Luther^ 
wrath  was  inflamed,  and  fearing  that  the  purity  of  his  caose  might  be  pol- 
luted and  confounded  with  tlie  abominations  of  this  rebellion,  he  enjoined,  ia 
his  pamphlet  against  the  plundering  and  murderous  peasants,  (A)  that  thij 
should  be  slaughtered  like  so  many  mad  dogs.  The  advice  was  literally  fbl* 
lowed  by  the  princes  of  both  the  Catholic  and  the  Protestant  parties.  But 
even  this  did  not  prevent  the  enemies  of  spiritual  liberty  from  ascribing  to 
it  those  abuses  which  were  committed  in  its  name,  and  the  people  inoiagiiied 
that  they  saw  in  Luther's  exhortation  to  engage  in  this  crusade  against  tiie 
peasants  more  of  the  courtier  than  of  the  popular  reformer,  (t)  It  was  at 
this  time  that  an  element  which  had  sprung  np  in  Luther's  mind  after  Ids 
return  from  the  Wartburg  became  decided,  and  gave  a  character  to  the  whok 
fhture  progress  of  the  Reformation.  In  connection  with  the  importance  of 
the  inner  life  and  of  faith,  was  introduced  the  necessity  of  an  external 
Church,  the  bold  process  of  demolition  was  modified  by  a  regard  for  history, 
and  amid  the  ruins  scattered  around  them,  the  reformers  now  oommenoed  die 
work  of  forming  a  new  ecclesiastical  establishment. 

c)  Slra'Mt,  llAuptst.  n.  Art  chr.  L«hr.  wider  cL  vnchr.  Wocbor  gepredigt  la  Flwiirfc  19ia  4 
Stroftel^  Miscell.  vol  III.  p.  Sas.       d)  Walch,  toU  XVL  p.  Mas. 

e)  Ib.p.  82«.       /)  lb.  p.  59. 

q)  Fdritt^nanny  ncues  Urkandeab.  vol  L  p.  2288S.  MelanctKon^  ITist  Th.  MOnx.  {^RoOka  vol  I. 
p.  208.  Walch,  vol.  XVI.  p.  199.)— Strobel,  Leben,  Schrr.  a.  Lehren  Th.  M.  K&rnl>.  ITVOi  Atfi- 
fikxnn,  Th.  M.  Drosd.  1S42. 

h)  Walch,  vol.  XVL  p.  91ai.       {)  Ib.p.99aA, 


GHAP.  L    BEFOBMATION.    1 886L  ERASMUS.  379 

§  826.    Braamus  and  Luther.     Cont.from  §  283. 

K  LMt^rhikhn^  de  Ensrol  tngenio  ot  doctr.  quid  valaerint  ad  Instaur.  sacroram.  Jen.  ISSd.   Chle- 
6m,  Er.  Q.  Loth  (Zeitnehr.  t  Hist  Tb.  1849.  P.  2.) 

Although  Luther  always  discovered  in  the  writings  of  Erasmus  more  of 
the  human  than  of  the  divine  element,  more  argument  for  error  than  revela- 
tion of  truth,  and  more  love  for  peace  than  for  the  cross,  with  an  humble 
admiration  of  his  talents  he  had  still  sought  (1519)  his  friendship,  {n)  In 
pleasant  but  serious  terms  Erasmus  commended  Luther^s  cause  to  Frederic  the 
Wwe,  for  he  could  not  but  see  its  justice  oven  from  the  faults  of  its  oppo- 
nents, (h)  He  also  proposed  terms  of  compromise  in  which  the  paj)acy  was 
treated  simply  as  an  equal  party,  (c)  But  in  consistency  with  his  character 
he  disapproved  of  carrying  a  controversy  which  might  arouse  any  amount  of 
passion  among  the  people  so  far  as  to  threaten  a  division  in  the  Church  and 
the  empire,  and  he  trembled  for  his  literary  world  and  for  his  learned  leisure. 
Bat  for  these  very  reasons,  as  well  as  from  his  regard  for  higher  intellectual 
affinities,  he  maintained  silence  in  spite  of  the  solicitations  of  prelates  and 
kings,  {d)  It  was  finally  the  friends  of  the  Reformation  thcmselve.^:,  who 
sometimes  boasted  that  he  belonged  to  their  party,  and  sometimes  re])roached 
him  for  what  they  called  his  cowardly  silence,  that  compelled  him  to  speuk.  {e) 
In  writing,  however,  against  Luther,  he  did  not  attempt  to  defend  the  super- 
stitions of  the  mendicant  friars,  nor  the  absolute  power  of  the  pope,  but  to 
adduce  the  proof  which  Luther  had  demanded  from  the  Scriptures  of  the 
freedom  of  the  moral  will.  (/)  The  great  champion  of  intellectual  freedom, 
in  consistency  with  the  logical  requirements  of  his  system,  did  not  hesitate 
in  a  passionate  reply  to  contend  for  the  innate  bondage  of  the  will,  {g)  for  he 
disposes  of  those  Scriptural  passages  which  imply  the  freedom  of  the  will  by 
•flserting  that  Grod  secretly  intends  the  reverse  of  what  he  expresses  in  his 
revealed  will,  and  that  the  apostles  spoke  of  such  a  freedom  only  by  way  of 
irony.  Erasmus  showed  that  such  an  assertion  was  arbitftry,  and  contrary 
to  all  scientific  rules,  (h)  But  while  Erasmus,  dreading  the  reproach  of  semi- 
pelagianism  to  which  he  was  justly  obnoxious,  concealed  and  anxiously  guarded 
his  own  views,  his  opponent  avowed  and  defended  what  he  regarded  as  infal- 
lible truth  with  bold  confidence.  Luther  therefore  appeared  to  the  literary 
men  of  his  own  party  triumphant,  and  to  the  people  the  whole  controversy 
was  completely  unintelligible.  After  this  dispute  Luther  committed  Erasmus 
to  the  judgment  of  Ohrist  as  an  epicurean,  an  atheist,  and  an  enemy  to  all 
religion,  (i) 


a)  Dtf  WdU  vol.  L  p.  89s8.  p.  59.  vol  IL  p.  49&— Vol  I.  p.  dITas. 
h)  SpalaUn,  Ann.  p.  28a.  Seckend.  AdditL  L  L  p.  lllas. 
o)  Eratmi  Epp.  (ed.  CUrie.)  XIII,  80.    BuHgny  vol  L  p.  886i». 
d)  Corp.  R^f.  vol.  L  p.  «88.  692. 

«)  Eratmi  Kpp.  XVIII,  28.     Corp.  Ref.  vol.  I.  p.  ^i.—  Vlrici  ah  IfuUm  Expostulatfo  com  Ena- 
Argent  1522.— />«  Wette  voL  II.  p.  489.    Unschnld.  Nachr.  1725.  p.  545. 
/)  Franm.  de  Ilbcro  arbftrio  Diatr.  1524.    Walch  vol.  XVI I L  p.  1962. 
g)  Luth,  do  aervo  arbitrlo  ad  Era^m.  1525.    Walcb  vol.  XVIII.  p.  2060. 

A)  Hyperaspi&tes  Dtatr.  adv.  servnin  arb.  Latb.  P.  IL  1526s.  (0pp.  vol  X.  p.  1249. 1330.)    Comp^ 
Xpp.  XXI.  2S. 

0  De  Wette  vol  IIL  p.  427.  vol  IV.  p.  497.    Walch  vol  XXIL  p^  161280. 


380  MODERN  CHUBGH  HISTOBT.    FEB.  Y.    A.  D.  1517-164a 

§  327.     Lnther*8  Domestic  Life  and  his  Colleagues, 

Luther  remained  longer  than  any  of  his  companions  with  the  prior  of  the 
deserted  monastery,  and  did  not  lay  aside  his  monk's  hahit  until  some  time  in 
Dec.  1524.  His  marriage  with  Catharine  von  Bora  (June  18,  1585),  a  nun 
belonging  to  the  disbanded  Cistercian  convent  of  Nimptsch,  was  neitlier  the 
result  of  an  ardent  passion,  nor  a  part  of  his  policy  as  a  reformer,  but  it  be- 
longed rather  to  his  private  life,  and  in  view  of  the  disturbed  Btate  of  the 
times  was  entered  upon  with  some  hesitation,  but  with  little  consultation.  It 
proceeded  from  a  general  inclination,  encouraged  by  the  wishes  of  the  parents, 
for  the  happiness  of  domestic  life,  the  joys  and  the  sorrows  of  which  he  after- 
wards experienced,  (a)  Indeed  abont  this  time  he  was  frequently  oppressed 
by  sickness,  and  prepared  for  a  sudden  death  by  reports  of  conspiradee 
against  his  life,  but  as  a  general  thing  he  sat  very  pleasantly  in  the  circle  of 
his  friends,  enjoying  with  a  keen  relish  not  only  the  holier  and  higher  pleasures 
of  religion,  but  the  innocent  amusements  of  music,  song,  and  many  a  bold 
jest.  iP)  His  extreme  kindness  and  honesty  of  heart  fitted  him  to  be  the 
oomforter  and  assistant  of  all  who  were  distressed.  Hb  moderate  ciroom- 
stances  were  precisely  such  as  his  disposition  and  position  rendered  suitable,  (c) 
Staupitz^  who  was  in  1519  in  the  service  of  the  Cardinal  of  Salzburg,  and  in 
1522  Abbot  of  the  Benedictines  (d.  1524),  about  1521  withdrew  himself  fh>m 
Luther,  being  alarmed  at  the  storm  raised  around  the  reformer.  Luther 
looked  upon  Staupitz  as  cold  and  pusillanimous,  but  the  man  who  firsi  kin- 
dled in  his  bosom  a  love  for  the  gospel  was  never  forgotten,  (d)  His  ooUeagnes 
faithfully  assisted  him  in  his  labors :  Nicolas  of  Amsdorf  (d.  at  Eisenach, 
1565),  who  adhered  to  Luther's  words  with  Luther's  own  vehemence ;  (fy 
Justus  Jonas  (d.  at  Eissfeld,  1555),  who  had  been  a  jurist,  and  was  theref<ntt 
appointed  provost  of  the  Castle  Church  at  Wittenberg,  an  eloquent  and 
akUftd  man,  {/)  and  the  gentle  Bugenhagen  (d.  at  Wittenberg,  1558),  who,  in 
spite  of  his  Pomenmian  dialect  and  prolixity,  was  in  the  highest  degree  dl|^ 
nified,  adapted  to  govern  a  church,  disinterested,  and  a  oomforter  to  Lother 
in  evil  times,  but  entirely  under  his  influence,  {g)  These  were  all  frequently 
engaged  in  various  ways  in  ecclesiastical  affairs  beyond  the  limits  of  Saxony, 
and  were  scattered  in  the  time  of  the  German  war.  CarUtadt  for  a  long 
time  persevered  in  advocating  a  destructive  process  as  the  only  proper  method 
of  reform,  and  was  anxious  to  introduce  into  ecclesiastical  and  civil  affidrs  an 


a)  De  Wette  vol  II.  p.  646.  vol  IIL  pi  la&  lOn.  jet  p.  21.  Corp.  Ref.  vol  I.  p.  754il  Waleh 
vol  XXIV.  p.  ISSsA.  826fta.  VeeMnmayer,  &.  gleichzeit  Schrr.  gegen  L.  Vorbelr.  (KHIjC  Areh.  ISSdL 
Tol  III.  P.  2.)  F.  Walch,  Cath.  v.  B.  Hal  1751sa.  S  Tola^  W,  .&•««,  0«Mb.  a  t.  B.  UaL  18181  /*. 
G.  Ifo/mann,  K.  v.  R  1346. 

b)  LtUh.  TischredAn,  (Memoire  of  his  ftiends,)  collented  by  Aniifkber.  Eisl  1566.  t  A  AreqneaiClj 
in  zweif.  Redaction  s.  Walcb  vol  XXIL  ed.  by  Forateinann  A  Bindscil  Lp&  1844-S^  [Lutkar^Ti- 
ble-Talk,  Lond.  ISma  A  with  Life  by  Barkhardt^  Load.  8va]  Michel^  H^moires  de  L.  6eriti  par 
lai-mvme.  Par.  1835.  4  vols. 

0)  PaUavic.  IV,  14. 12.    De  WetU  vol  IIL  p.  495a.  vol  V.  p.  767.    Watch  vol  XXL  p.  STOl  vol 
XXIV.  p.  57s.  198as.— (rdt»  do  paoperUto  L.  Lub.  1719.  4.     Ukeri  vol  L  pw  8478B. 
cf)  I  80S.  nt  b.        e)  O.  Btrgtur,  do  Nie.  d.  Amad.  Maf(d.  1718m.  3  Pgg.  4 

f)  Knapp^  Narr.  do  Justo  Joiia.  Hal  1S17. 

g)  ZieUf  J.  Bugenh.  Lpa.  1829.    Krq/t,  de  J.  Bag.  ia  res  eoa  meritlft.  Hmb.  1881. 4 


CHAP.  L    BEFOBMATION.    1 828.  PS0TE8TATI0N.  381 

nnoondidoiml  adherence  to  the  obvious  and  literal  construction  of  the  Scrip- 
tures. By  snch  a  course  he  necessarily  came  into  collision  with  the  Reforma- 
tion, and  approached  very  near  the  brink  of  spiritual  apostasy,  but  at  last  he 
found  peace  and  moderation  for  his  agitated  spirit  in  Switzerland  (d.  at  Basle, 
1541).  (h)  With  the  jurists  also  Luther  had  some  misunderstanding  for  a 
while,  on  account  of  his  burning  of  the  canon  law.  But  as  he  could  not  pre- 
vent others  from  studying  it,  and  finally  commenced  the  study  of  it  himself,  (/) 
we  find  that  even  at  Worms  Dr.  Schnrf  came  forward  as  his  faithful  advo- 
cate. 

i  828.    Religimis  Liberty  and  the  Protestation, 

The  emperor  finally  succeeded  in  destroying  the  French  army  near  Pavia, 
and  in  taking  their  Mng  a  prisoner.    The  latter  at  the  peace  of  Madrid  (Jan.  1 4, 
1526)  purchased  his  liberty,  though  on  difl3cult  terms,  which  he  never  intended 
to  fulfil.    Clement  YII.  soon  after  absolved  him  from  his  oath,  and  became  the 
prime  mover  of  a  confederacy  against  the  exorbitant  power  of  the  emperor. 
This  made  the  emperor  willing  to  suspend  the  execution  of  the  edict  of 
Worms,  but  his  brother  in  Germany  was  reluctant  at  such  a  time  to  embitter 
the  feelings  of  the  members  of  the  Catholic  league  by  such  a  step,  and  ac- 
oordlngly  the  diet  at  Speyer  (Aug.,  1526)  was  unanimous  in  the  decree,  that 
until  the  meeting  of  a  general  council,  every  state  should  act  with  respect  to 
the  edict  of  Worms  as  it  might  venture  to  answer  to  God  and  liis  imperial 
mifjesty.  («)   The  vile  notification  by  Otho  von  Pack,  that  the  Catholic  princes 
bid  combined  together  for  the  overthrow  of  the  Protestant  powers  (1628), 
WIS  the  occasion  not  only  of  bringing  out  the  warlike  spirit  of  Ilcsse  and  of 
Electoral  Saxony,  but  of  showing  how  far  the  peace  of  Germany  itself  was 
oidaDgered  by  the  controversies  with  respect  to  religion,  (b)    The  army  of 
^  emperor,  nrged  on  by  the  zeal  of  the  Lutheran  foot  soldiers,  stormed  and 
plundered  the  city  of  Rome  (May  6,  1527).    After  many  vicissitudes  in  the 
fortune  of  the  war,  the  sovereignty  of  Italy  was  secured  to  Charles  in  the 
ipring  of  1529,  and  the  pope  himself  acquiesced  in  the  arrangement.    Charles 
v.,  however,  was  obliged  to  pay  some  deference  to  the  feelings  of  his  Catho- 
Bo  nbjects  in  his  hereditary  dominions.    A  Catholic  majority  was  therefore 
(Mned  at  the  Diet  of  Speyer,  which  enacted  that  the  edict  of  Worms 
ihoald  continue  to  be  enforced  in  those  states  which  had  hitherto  acknowl- 
edged its  anthority,  but  that  no  innovations  should  be  required  in  the  remain- 
u^  provinces,  tliat  none  should  be  obstructed  in  celebrating  the  mass,  and 
thit  the  privileges  of  every  spiritual  estate  should  be  respected.    Against 
^  Hecess  of  the  imi)erial  diet,  by  which  the  Beformation  would  have  been 
condemned  by  its  own  friends  to  a  fatal  stagnation.  Electoral  Saxony,  Hesse. 
lAitibnrg,  Anhalt,  the  Margrave  of  Brandenburg,  and  fourteen  imperial 
^^  presented  a  Protestation  (April  19,  1529)  and  an  appeal  (April  25) 


A)  rimU,  Lebenageach.  A.  Bodenat.  v.  Karlat  Frk£  a.  U  1776^  Jf.  OSb^l,  A.  B.  t.  Kartot  (Stud. 
•"Kritis*!.  p.  1.) 

0  ^  Wem  ToL  III.  p.  43& 

^)  TU  or1«.  docamenta  In  BuchoUa^  FcnL  L  roL  III.  p.  STlas.     Waleh  voL  XYL  p^  2480& 
*^<M  II.  p.  27588. 
^)  nurtUder  roL  L  Book  II.    Rank€  vol.  IIL  p.  2988. 


382  MODERN  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  Y.    A.  D.  1617-164& 

to  the  emperor,  to  a  general  or  German  conncil,  and  to  all  impartial 
titm  judges,  not  only  on  the  ground  of  the  prior  and  clear  decision  at  8 
but  on  the  principle  that  in  matters  which  relate  to  the  honor  of  6c 
the  salTation  of  souls,  the  authority  of  a  migority  was  not  to  be  reg 
This  was  done  not  only  in  behalf  of  themselves,  but  also  of  their  peopl 
of  all  who  then  or  afterwards  might  believe  in  the  word  of  God.  (c) 

§  829.    Synod  of  Uomherg,  1526.    Saxon  Church  Visitation,  1627-1 

The  Reformation  had  been  introduced  in  various  forms  according 
circumstances  of  the  different  places  where  it  prevailed.  The  jurisdid 
the  bishops  had  been  in  fact  abolished,  and  yet  no  other  govemmei 
been  substituted  for  it.  A  synod  was  therefore  convened  by  the  Lan* 
at  Ilomherg^  composed  of  all  who  could  be  considered  according  to  1 
or  the  new  views  the  proper  representatives  of  the  Church  in  Hesse, 
and  prelates  were  silent  under  the  glowing  eloquence  of  the  exiled  Mi 
Liimhert  of  Avignon  (d.  1580),  and  a  synodal  constitution  based  upon 
oratic  principles  was  adopted,  according  to  which  every  congregatic 
competent  to  the  whole  duty  of  ecclesiastical  discipline,  (a)  The  £le4 
Saxony,  on  the  urgent  solicitation  of  the  pastors  in  his  dominions  t 
would  take  up  tlie  same  subject  for  their  churches,  appointed  eccles 
and  lay  commissioners,  who  formed  a  directory  for  divine  worship  and 
lar  instruction  on  the  basis  of  Melanothon^s  liook  of  Visitation,  (h)  tl 
Confession  of  the  evangelical  faith.  This  had  the  effect  of  harmonlQ 
practice  of  all  the  churches,  evangelical  preachers  were  appointed  b; 
commissioners  in  all  ploc/es,  and  arrangements  were  made  with  thot 
possessed  the  titles  to  spiritual  endowments  by  which  these  were  ab€ 
Superintendents  were  appointed  to  exercise  ecclesiastical  supervisio 
decide  cases  relating  to  marriage,  (c)  The  ignorance  of  the  people 
their  teachers  which  Luther  discovered  during  this  visitation  affecti 
very  deeply,  and  reflecting  that  intellectual  freedom  can  be  endured  onl; 
intelligent  people,  and  that  children  are  the  true  sovereigns  of  the  fat 
composed  (1529)  two  Catechisms,  in  which  divine  mysteries  are  presei 
simple  popular  language,  and  in  a  form  suitable  for  children,  (d)  The 
siastical  Constitution  which  was  the  result  of  this  Saxon  visitation,  I 
the  common  model  to  which  the  other  German  churches  in  the  countr 
conformed. 


c)  J.  J.  JfuUer,  Iliitt.  T.  d.  ev,  Btinde  Prot  a.  Api».  Jena.  1705.  4.  J,  A,  IT.  Tittmanu^ 
d.  cv.  Btilnde  ni.  hist  Eri&ut  Lpsi  1S29.  A.  Junff^  Ocsch.  d.  Rcichst  ru  Sp.  1529.  (Bcltrr.  i.  ( 
Ref.  1880.  Tol.  I.  Abth.  1.)    For  tbe  orig.  documents  there  qnutod:  (hrp.  Ref.  toI.  I.  p.  IWTi 

a)  Kef.  Ecc^  Hawiae.  i^Schminkt^  Monn.  Ham.  Th.  IL  p.  68a)    Lamh.  Ep.  ad  Coloa  ed. 
OteM.  1780.  K.— Martin^  Nachr.  r.  d.  Syn.  za  Homb.  Cass.  1804.    Ron\mtl  vol.  IIL  Abth.  I. ; 
Bach,  Oesch.  d.  Karhess.  KVerC  Marb.  1882.    J.  W.  Baum,  Fr.  Lamb.  Strasb.  lS4a    P 
UetM.  KKW:  Ordnang,  ed.  hy  K.  A.  Credner,  Qleaa.  1852. 

h)  Unterrlcht  d.  VUitatoren  an  die  P&rfa.  (Lat  1527.)  M.  Loth.  Voir.  Yaitt  152a  4  edit  In 
Oerinan  by  Sttobel,  Altd.  1777. 

c)  Kapp,  Nachlese.  vol  L  p.  178aii.    Rotnherg,  /.  d.  eraien  Kfrcbenvla.  Bnl.  1754  4 

d)  Fci^A  vol.  X.  p.  2ia.  JttfirtMfi,  hist  krit  EinL  In  beido  Haupt-Kat  Elbrt  1824  /fl^ 
moriA  atr.  Cat  Luth.  Lpa.  1828aa.  4  P.  4 


CHAP.  L    BEFORMATION.    f  880.  DIET  OF  AUGSBURG.  383 

§  880.     The  Diet  of  Augtiburg,  1530. 

JL  Pro  reL  chr.  res  gestae  in  oomttiis  Ang.  a.  1530.  {Cyprian^  Hist  p.  STss.)  On  the  other  side: 
Oeseh.  d.  rellglonshandl  za  Angsb.  (Forstemann^  Arcblv.  IlaL  1^1.  vol.  I.  P.  1.)  A  report 
vUeh  was  presented  at  Angsb.  1680,  contribnted  by  MoMer.  (Stud.  a.  Krit  16.V).  II.  8.  before  in 
lAth.  Werke  bj  Waleh  toL  XVI.  p.  878.  912efi.  aa  if  ttom  Spalatin,  comp.  Gif»eUr^  Stnd.  n.  Krlt. 
last  1L  8.  Walch  voL  XVL  p.  734bs.  Forstemann^  Urknndenbnch  z.  Ge$>ch.  d.  Keichst  zu  A.  Hal. 
1888-&  2  vols.  Corp.  Rff,  vol.  II.  p.  SOss.— rAyfra*M«,  H.  d.  A.  C.  Rost  1576.  4.  Lat  Frcf  1578.  4. 
md  often.  CoeUttini  Hist  Comitior.  Aug.  celcbr.  Frc£  ad  V.  (1577.)  1597.  t  Ve^enmayer^  k1. 
Baltrr.  a.  Geach.  d.  K.  zu  A.  NQmb.  1880.  16. 

IL  Cyprian,  Hiat  d.  A.  C.  Goth.  (1730.)  1736.  Botermund,  Gescli.  d.  zu  A.  Qberg.  Bekenntn. 
Bann.  1829.  Jf.  FueliM,  Qesch.  d.  Reichi^t  zn  A.  Lpz.  1880.  Fikengcher,  Qesch.  d.  Reicbst  za  A. 
H&rab.  1880.  C.  P/af,  Gesch.  d.  Reichst  za  A.  Stattg.  1680.— (7.  G.  Weber,  Gescb.  d.  A.  a  Frkf. 
ITa&SToIa. 

A  peace  had  been  conclnded  by  the  victorious  Charles  V.  with  France 
nd  Rome.    In  the  spring  of  the  year  1580  he  crossed  the  Alps,  resolved 
either  to  lead  back  to  the  Church  those  who  had  wandered  from  it,  or  to 
tTenge  the  ignominy  heaped  upon  Christ.    At  his  request  the  protesting 
itates  drew  up  a  statement  of  their  faith  and  of  the  abuses  discarded  by 
ihem.    This  Confession^  composed  by  Melancthon,  approved  by  Luther,  and 
rigned  by  the  States,  presented  the  ultimate  points  to  which  they  could  go  in 
file  way  of  concession  for  the  sake  of  peace.    On  the  25th  of  June,  it  was 
read  in  German  by  the  Chancellor  of  Saxony  before  the  Diet  at  Augsburg^ 
and  afterwards  committed  to  the  hands  of  the  emperor  in  Latin  and  German. 
Ai  the  object  of  this  paper  was  religious,  practical  and  political,  the  peculiar 
derelopment  of  Protestantism  is  not  made  so  prominent  in  it  as  the  points 
in  which  that  system  agreed  with  the  ancient  Catholic  faith,  and  the  opposi- 
tion to  abuses  which  were  generally  acknowledged  by  all  intelligent  persons 
of  that  period.    A  few  of  the  prelates  avowed  themselves  ready  to  dip  their 
pens  in  their  own  blood  to  answer  it,  but  some  of  the  princes  and  lords  were 
lifonght  by  it  to  perceive  that  they  had  hitherto  been  incorrectly  informed 
Wepecting  the  new  doctrine,  and  the  Protestants  themselves  attained  by  it 
tt  established  centre  for  their  own  unity.    By  the  command  of  the  emperor, 
»  Confutation  was  composed  by  Eck,  Faber,  Cochlaeus,  and  Wimpina,  and 
lead  (Aug.  8)  in  the  diet,  but  it  was  so  pitiful  an  affair  that  it  only  raised  the 
courage  of  the  Protestants.    On  the  22d  of  Sept.,  however,  when  the  States 
preeented  their  Apology,  the  emperor  refused  to  receive  it,  and  had  a  decree 
pMsed  which  asserted  that  the  Confession  was  opposed  to  the  unquestionable 
principles  of  the  Sacred  Scriptures.    Melancthon,  offended  at  such  abuse, 
oiMe  more  revised  his  Apology^  and  published  it  even  during  the  session  of 
t^  diet  as  an  appeal  to  the  age  in  which  he  lived,  as  well  as  to  subsequent 
*^B»ee.    The  recess  of  the  diet,  passed  Nov.  19th,  threatened  after  a  brief  pe- 
riod of  indulgence  utterly  to  exterminate  the  new  sect.     The  protesting 
Prinoes,  esteeming  the  favor  of  Christ  far  more  than  the  displeasure  of  the 
•>P«ror,  after  presenting  their  Protest,  took  their  leave  of  the  city, 

§  881.     League  of  Smalkald  and  Peace  of  Nuremberg. 

The  danger  of  the  Protestants  became  evident  at  Augsburg.  The  impe- 
'W  ootmcil,  to  which  was  committed  the  task  of  executing  the  recess  of  the 
^  next  commenced  a  legal  process  against  the  Protestant  States  for  hav- 


i 


384  MODEBN  GHUBCH  HISTORY.    PER.  Y.    A.  D.  1MT-1M& 

ing  confiscated  the  property  of  the  Church.  When,  therefore,  the  diTinee 
of  Wittenberg  had  acknowledged  that  the  imperial  states  were  jostified  as 
magistrates  in  protecting  their  subjects  from  unjust  aggressions,  (a)  these 
Protestant  powers  assembled  together  at  Snuilkald  on  Ghriatmas,  1580,  and 
formed  a  well -organized  league  in  1531,  for  mutual  defence  by  force  of  arms, 
embracing  the  princes  and  the  most  powerful  cities  of  Upper  and  Lower  Ger- 
many, with  the  Elector  of  Saxony  and  the  Landgrave  as  the  leaders  of  the 
confederacy,  {h)  All  those  who  were  dissatisfied  with  the  imperial  govem- 
ment,  among  whom  was  Bavaria  itself  on  account  of  its  displeasure  at  the 
appointment  of  Ferdinand  to  be  king  of  the  Romans,  placed  tliemselves 
under  the  protection  of  this  formidable  power.  As  the  Sultan  Solyman  was 
threatening  to  invade  Germany,  and  especially  Austria,  the  emperor  was 
obliged  to  purrhiise  internal  peace  and  efficient  aid  against  the  Turks  at  any 
price.  Even  his  confessor  advised  him  to  give  up  the  vain  fancy  of  saving 
men^B  souls,  and  content  himself  with  winning  back  his  obedient  subjects,  (e) 
A  religious  peace  was  tlierefore  concluded  at  Nuremberg  (July  28,  1582)  ((Q 
through  the  mediation  of  the  Elector  of  Mentz  and  the  Elector  Palatine,  by 
the  terms  of  which  both  parties  agreed  to  abstain  from  mutual  hostilitiea 
until  the  meeting  of  a  general  council.  This  could  be  regarded  only  as  an 
acknowledgment  on  the  part  of  the  Catholics  that  they  were  yet  unprepared 
to  become  assailants,  and  on  the  part  of  the  Protestants  that  they  were  re- 
strained by  conscientious  scruples.  This  peace  embraced  only  those  who  had 
already  professed  adherence  to  the  Confession  of  Augsburg.  The  emperor 
pledged  himself  that  the  suits  in  religious  matters  should  in  the  mean  time  be 
suspended. 

11.   Establishment  of  the  Reformed  Churoh  until  1581. 

J.  V.  Mailer's  u.  B.  Olntx-Blotzheim's  Oeschcta.  Schweizer.  Eidgen.  (5  toIs.)  eont.  hfJ,  J,  B$^ 
tlnger,  6.  7.  vol  till  1C81.  Zur.  1825-9. 

§  382.     Youth  and  Doctrine  of  Zwingle. 

L  0pp.  od.  Oxtalther,  (Tig.  545s.)  581.  4  vols,  t  M.  SchuUr  «t  J.  SchuUkt^  Tig.  18eS-48.  8  TohL 
(1st  and  2d  vols,  tlie  German,  to1&  8-S.  the  Lat.  original,  and  the  former  In  a  Lat  tnniaL)  Aua&  ▼. !» 
Usterl  Ai  Viigelln.  Zur.  18199.  8  vols.  Selections  from  the  ptact  Works  (and  tnuialatiooa  Id  the 
Germ.)  v.  R.  ChrUtoffel,  Zur.  18488.  8  vols.  Oecolampadii  et  ZwinglU  Epii.  1.  IF.  Bas.  (15ML  £) 
1592.  i.  Before  this  edition :  09w.  Mj/oonii  £p.  de  Vita  et  oMta  Z.  Respecting  the  Lottors  of  7^ : 
Arch,  t  KOesoh.  1S15.  vol  IIL  St  8. 

IL  {Kii9cheUr)  Z.  LeWnsgescb.  ZOr.  1770.  J.  C.  JTtM,  vie  d'U.  Z.  Par.  et  06n.  Traaal.  Into 
Germ,  vrilh  uba.  by  Z.  VvUH^  Z&r.  ISU.  Suppl.  in  Arcbiv.  f.  KG.  1818.  vol.  L  St  8.  II,  &  U.  W. 
Hotermund^  Lcben  Z.  m.  Abrids  d.  schw.  Bef.  Brm.  181 S.  J.  JT.  Schultr^  Z.  Qesch.  sr.  Bfldnng  & 
Reformator.  ZQr.  1819.  Sal  J/eM,  Un>pning,  Gang.  a.  Folgen  d.  dorcb  Z.  in  Zikr.  bcwMLtOD  BcC 
ZHt.  182a  i.J.J.  Jlottinger,  II.  Z.  n.  a.  Z<.it  Zar.  1848w  [Life  of  Zwingle,  transL  fhtm  Genu,  of  i. 
U.  Hess,  by  Lwy  AUceti,  Svo.  Lond.  1812.  In  Blackwood's  Mag.  for  1828.  and  IJttellls  ReL  Mi^ 
vol.  II.  for  lS2a  MiscelL  of  Tract  Soc.  vol  8.  p.  289-820.  Life  of  U.  Z.  and  Sketch  of  OeeoL  pobL 
by  Pre&  B.  of  Pabl.  Pbtlad.  18.    K  Zeller  has  announced  a  work  on  the  theoL  systom  «f  JBwli^] 

Euldrkh  Zwingliy  the  son  of  the  amman  of  "Wildhaus  (b.  Jan.  1, 14B4X 

a)  Waldi  vol  X.  p.  66088.  comp.  656. 
5)  ITalcA  vol  XVL  PL  2142SB.    //orf^ed^rr  voL  L  L  VIII,  Tsai 

0)  Briefo  an  K.  Karl  V.  v.  &  Beichtr.  Mitgeth.  (fh)m  the  Span.  Imp.  ArcbiTa8»  by  O,  SdM^ 
Brl  184a 

d)  ITa^  to].  XYL  p.  81828a.    JJortfed^r  vol  L  I,  m 


CHAP.  I.    BEFOBMATION.    f  882.  ZWINOLE.  385 

beoame  Tened  in  dassioal  learning,  and  received  a  liberal  thoologioal  edn- 
eatioii  in  the  city  of  Basle.    lie  was  for  some  time  no  stranger  to  the  pleasures 
of  the  world,  and  was  especially  skilfal  in  playing  upon  the  late,  bat  he 
gradually  became  (after  1518)  deeply  interested  in  the  stady  of  the  original 
text  of  the  New  Testament,  that  he  might  learn  the  will  of  Grod  from  the  divine 
word  itself.    After  spending  ten  years  as  the  pastor  of  a  church  in  Glarus^  he 
was  appointed  preacher  in  the  convent  of  Einsiedlin  (1516),  where  he  took 
occasion,  from  the  crowds  which  thronged  as  pilgrims  to  the  miraculous 
nnage  of  Mary,  to  preach  that  prayer  should  be  offered  not  to  Mary,  the  pure 
handmaid  of  the  Lord,  but  to  Ohrist  the  only  mediator.    In  consequence  of 
lua  evangelical  preaching  he  was  invited  to  become  a  chaplain  at  Zurich^ 
where  on  New  Tear's  morning,  1519,  his  powers  of  popular  eloquence  were 
exerted  in  the  cathedral  itself  in  defence  of  the  reformation  both  in  Church 
md  in  common  life.    The  Swiss  Confederacy  was  in  legal  form  still  a  mem- 
ller  of  the  German  empire,  and  at  that  time  the  recollection  of  those  glori- 
ous deeds  by  which  liberty  had  been  restored  to  their  mountains  was  by  no 
neans  loat  in  the  hearts  of  the  people,  but  the  honesty  and  unanimity  of  the 
olden  times  had  already  become  much  impaired  by  numerous  enlistments  of 
the  people  as  mercenaries  in  the  wars  of  foreign  nations.    As  an  earnest  re- 
publican, Zwingle  was  zealously  opposed  to  the  oligarchy,  to  their  annuities 
from  foreign  princes,  and  to  their  trade  in  Christian  blood,  (a)    Conscious  of 
tiieir  own  independence,  the  people  had  set  bounds  to  the  exorbitant  claims 
of  the  qoiritnal  courts  (p.  288).    But  the  idle  and  warlike  youth  fought  the 
Utiles  of  the  pope  for  his  money,  and  when  this  could  not  be  obtained, 
Julius  II.  paid  them  with  ecclesiastical  gifts  and  preferments.    In  the  fidelity 
of  1u8  Swiss  guards  the  vicar  of  Christ  found  a  security  for  his  body  against 
the  fickle  spirit  of  the  Roman  people.     From  a  papal  nuncio  residing  at 
Zorich,  Zwingle  annually  received  fifty  florins,  with  which  he  purchased 
books.     Bemardin  Samson^  a  Franciscan  from  Milan,  opened  a  traffic  in 
indulgences  among  the  inhabitants  of  the  Alps  (1518).    Zwingle  preached 
igunst  him,  but  the  Bishop  of  Constance  himself  persuaded  the  city  of 
Znrioh  to  close  its  gates  against  him,  and  when  complaint  was  made  to  the 
pope  respecting  the  mischief  caused  by  the  traffic,  Leo  X.  promised  to  call 
the  trader  to  an  account.     Zwingle  was  acquainted  with  some  of  Luther^s 
vritings,  but  although  very  unlike  that  great  reformer  in  religious  profund- 
ity and  genius,  in  consequence  of  his  demand  that  every  thing  should  be  set 
<ado  which  could  not  be  proved  from  the  Scriptures,  he  was  induced  by  the 
independent  study  of  those  Scriptures  much  more  suddenly  and  uncondition- 
ally to  break  loose  from  the  ancient  Church,  (b)    It  was  for  this  reason  also, 
that  although  nothing  was  dearer  to  him  than  truth,  many  errors  which  had 
W  been  perceived,  were  not  distinctly  condemned,  (r)    His  faith  mounted 
npward  in  bold  speculations,  though  it  dways  returned  to  the  path  which  an 
ii^Bgent  judgment  approved,  and  which  was  favorable  to  spiritual  im- 
P'^etfient    In  opposition  to  a  righteousness  by  mere  external  works,  he 


a)  BuUinger^  Refonnationigosch.  toI.  L  p.  41ii  4St.  01. 

b)  Proolb  in  NiUcheUr  p.  157as.    Sch^il«r,  jk  119.  SSft. 

c)  £.  g.  OMlngtr,  H.  «oa  p.  XVL  P.  II.  p.  SOT. 

26 


386  MODERN  CHUBCn  HISTOBY.    FEB.  Y.    A.  D.  1617-ieia 

also  saw  that  justification  was  to  be  obtained  entirely  throngli  the  merits  of 
Christ.  But  original  sin  was  in  his  estimation  a  mere  disease,  the  moral  will 
was  subject  only  to  Providenoe,  and  he  looked  upon  Hercules,  Socrates,  and 
the  Catos,  as  belonging  to  the  communion  of  the  blessed,  though  they  could 
be  saved  only  through  Christ,  (d) 

§  883.    Introduction  of  the  Reformation. 

Through  Zwingle^s  influence  the  great  Council  of  Zurich  gave  orders  that 
all  preachers  should  confine  themselves  to  what  was  contained  in  the  divine 
Scriptures,  but  maintain  silence  with  respect  to  non-essential  innovations  and 
institutions  (1620).  (a)  For  the  sake  of  those  who  were  opposed,  and  that  the 
truth  might  be  more  publicly  known,  he  determined  to  defend  in  the  muni* 
cipal  hall  at  Zurich  sixty-seven  propositions  which  he  had  formed  agunst 
the  whole  external  polity  of  the  Catholic  Church.  When,  however,  he  pub- 
licly announced  them  (Jan.  29,  1528),  only  a  few  objections  were  presented 
by  Faber  of  Constance,  {h)  In  a  second  disputation  (Oct.  26->28),  a  decision 
was  given  against  the  use  of  images  and  the  sacrifice  of  the  mass,  (c)  An 
easy  victory  waa  obtained  for  the  Reformation  when  the  principle  was  once 
adopted,  that  every  thing  must  be  proved  by  the  Scriptures,  interpreted  on^ 
by  the  Scriptures  themselves.  Leo  Juda^  Zwingle^s  colleague  in  office,  in  the 
spirit  of  the  Reformed  Church  translated  Luther^s  New  Testament  into  the 
Swiss-German  dialect  (1525),  and  the  Old  Testament  from  the  original  text 
rtill  1529).  Zwingle  looked  upon  every  local  church,  in  proportion  as  its 
opinions  were  based  upon  the  Holy  Scriptures,  as  completely  justified  in  con- 
tending against  the  whole  hierarchy.  The  Great  Council,  regardless  of  the 
protests  of  the  Bishop  of  Constance,  but  sustained  by  public  opinion,  intro- 
duced tlie  new  constitution  into  the  Church  (15249).  The  established  church 
of  Appenzcll^  beyond  the  Rhone,  resolved  that  preachers  who  taught  what 
could  not  be  proved  from  the  Sacred  Scriptures  should  be  denied  support 
and  protection,  {d)  Berthold  Haller  (d.  1536)  preached,  though  with  cau- 
tion, in  behalf  of  the  Reformation  in  Berne,  {e)  and  Manuel^  in  a  Carnival 
play,  exposed  to  public  derision  the  avarice  of  the  clergy  and  their  fear  of 
the  gospel.  (/)  Oecolampadim  (d.  Nov.  28,  1581),  tlie  learned  fHend  of 
Erasmus,  and  in  ordinary  matters  a  timid  and  peaceable  man,  but  kept  in 
perpetual  agitation  in  such  stormy  times  for  his  advocacy  of  the  cause  of  his 
Lord,  was  the  principal  instrument  in  directing  the  minds  of  the  people  of 
Basle  into  the  path  of  the  Reformation,  although  a  knowledge  of  its  elements 
had  been  previously  acquired  from  the  general  perusal  of  Luther^s  writ- 

d)  Com.  de  vera  et  Iklaa  reL  Tig.  1525.  Fidel  ratio  •A  Car.  Impi  Ti^  1680.  4.  Ghr.  fldd  Uvvlt 
et  clani  exp.  ad  Kegem  chr.  (ed.  BulUnger.)  Tig.  1588.  De  providentia.  (voL  L>— ZflBtfr,  4e  tbeoL 
System  Zw.  (Th.  Jahrb.  1858.  U.  la.) 

a)  FHA^li,  Beitrr.  vol.  IL  p.  887.    BuUingtr  vol  L  p.  83. 

I)  Ci>ncluMonea.  (0pp.  vol  L  pi  la.)  ExplAiiaUa  (/fr.  p.  Sia.)  Acta  diipat  (toL  IL  p^  MTm.) 
BiMingtr  vol.  I.  p.  84fl8.  978a. 

0)  Acts  in  Zwingle*s  Works.  toL  L  p.  589aB.    Buttinger  toI.  L  p.  126aB. 

d)  Klaarer'tt  account  in  Bimler,  vol  L  Part  IIL  p.  SOSaa 

e)  Kirchhofer,  B.  Haller  a.  d.  ReC  t.  Bern.  Zar.  188& 

/)  C.  GriineUen,  Niclaoa  Manael,  Leben  n.  Werkei  Btnttg.  188?. 


CHAP.  L    REFOBMATION.     %9B&.  BADKS.    BEBVEL    BA8LE.  387 

inga.  O7)    The  inhabitants  of  those  places  which  were  £avorable  to  the  Catho- 
lic Chnrchf  hoping  to  overcome  their  opponents  by  their  favorite  weapons, 
and  relying  npon  tiie  talents  and  skill  of  Dr.  Eck,  appointed  a  day  for  a  pub- 
lic disputation  at  Baden  (May,  1526).    As  Zwingle  had  reason  to  fear  for  his 
safety  should  he  venture  to  be  present  in  that  city,  Oecolaropadius  was  the 
principal  opponent  of  Eck  in  tliis  disputation.    The  subjects  which  engaged 
their  attention  were  the  presence  of  Ohrist^s  sacred  body  in  the  sacrament, 
the  sacrifice  of  the  mass,  the  worship  of  saints,  the  use  of  images,  and  the 
doctrine  of  purgatory.     On  the  part  of  Eck  there  was  great  blustering, 
while  Oecolampadias  contended  only  by  arguments,  but  both  claimed  the 
eredit  of  a  victory.  (A)    Berne  endeavored  to  keep  aloof  from  the  agitations 
of  the  controversy,  and  its  council  gave  orders  that  some  of  the  more  obvi- 
ous and  serious  abuses  should  be  removed,  and  that  preaching  should  be  con- 
formed both  to  the  Scriptures  and  to  the  ancient  faith.  (0    But  such  partial 
measnrcs  were  by  no  means  adequate  to  the  exigencies  of  the  times.    No 
loooer  had  the  great  council  once  more  assumed  the  supreme  power,  than 
both  parties  were  invited  to  a  public  discussion,  which  was  attended  by  all 
the  leaders  of  the  Reformation  in  the  country  (Jan.,  1528).    The  result  was 
so  decisive,  that  soon  after  a  public  decree  was  issued  by  the  council,  in  which 
the  Jurisdiction  of  the  bishops  was  entirely  renounced,  and  the  idolatrous 
worship  of  Rome  was  abolished,  {k)    In  Basle^  the  Reformation  became  vic- 
torious in  consequence  of  the  triumph  of  the  municipal  guilds  (1529).  (I) 
The  dty  of  St.  Gall  embraced  the  evangelical  doctrine  (1528),  the  abbot 
fled,  and  the  friends  of  religion  became  organized  into  a  community  under 
the  protection  of  Zurich  and  Glarus.  (m)    For  in  Glarus^  where  it  was  de- 
eded after  a  severe  contest  that  every  congregation  should  choose  for  itself, 
te  mifjority  were  in  favor  of  the  Reformation.    Sehaffhauaen^  after  oonnd- 
eraUe  hesitation,  gave  in  its  adhesion  to  it  (1629),  and  in  Solevre  neither 
pirty  obtained  the  ascendency.    In  every  place  where  the  new  doctrines  pr^ 
Tuled,  every  thing  opposed  to  them  was  rigorously  put  down.    The  altars 
v«re  destroyed  and  the  idols  were  burned.    In  the  Gray  League  alone  (the 
Griscms),  after  the  disputation  at  Ilantz  (1526),  the  law  allowed  every  one  to 
tike  bis  choice  between  the  old  and  the  new  faith.    And  yet  when  Schlegel, 
tbe  abbot  of  8t.  Luke,  contrived  a  treasonable  conspiracy  with  the  Castellan 
cC  MasBO  fbr  the  overthrow  of  the  heretics  of  Cairfy  he  was  beheaded 
(1529).  (n)    The  popes,  who  stood  in  need  of  Swiss  soldiers,  and  could  do 
nothteg  against  the  will  of  a  republican  people,  preserved  for  a  long  time 
fiuk  more  than  the  semblance  of  peace.  (0) 


f)  Orynatmi  et  Captto^  de  tIU  et  oblta  Oec  bcfbre  Ms  tnd  Zwingle^s  "Ejp^—S.  Heit^  Lebonft- 
fwk.  J.Oek.  Z&r.  1798.    J.  J.  Uenog,  d.  Lehen  J.  Oek.  n.  d.  R«C  la  Basel.  Bm.  1848.  2  voU 

&)  BulUnger  toL  L  p.  SSlia.  Edit  of  the  Acts  of  the  Reformers,  by  Ifurrur^  (Lucerne.  1527.  i.) 
iBMncUf  regarded  by  tbe  Reformers  as  inaocarate.       i)  ButUnger  vol  I.  p.  llOsa. 

^  76.  ToL  L  p.  806m.  496s8.  WaUh  vol  XVII.  p.  M08.~{7.  FUcker,  Geach.  d.  Dll>^  n.  Ref  In 
*«>■  Bcra.  18S8.  Kmkn,  d.  Refomuttoren  Berna.  Ben.  1S28.  Reapecttng  the  otber  Jab4Iee  pabli- 
cMioii:  fitnd.  n.  KrIL  1888.  P.  4  p.  901  sol  <C  L,  «.  HaUer^  Qeach.  d.  klrchL  Rer.  a  proL  Rofl  d. 
KntflatB.  D.  d.  omlles.  Oegend.  Luc.  1888.       /)  BMingw  toL  IL  pi  SSea.  Slsa. 

«)  Ih.  ToL  IL  p.  SSOsa.    SiniUr  toI.  L  p.  llSsa.     Vemtt,  Kessler.  (|  819.  nt  <t) 

>)  After  Kampell  and  do  Porta:  L.  Truog^  Gesch.  d.  Ret  v.  Oraab.  Gotre.  1819.  p.  89Mb  89.  Bvl- 
"■tfiPvel  IL  p.  84k       o)  EL  f.  BulUnger  toL  L  p.  88ii 


888  MODERN  CHUBCH  HISTORY.    PER.  Y.    A.  D.  1517-16181 

§  884.    Ditition  of  the  Stem  Confederacy, 

The  evangelical  doctrines  of  the  Reformation  agitated  all  the  cantons  of  the 
confederacy,  but  the  rural  population  of  the  mountainous  districts  being  ^s- 
pleased,  under  the  influence  of  the  priests,  with  the  political  demands  of  Zwingie, 
were  especially  distinguished  for  their  adherence  to  the  ancient  faith.  Uri, 
Schwytz,  Unterwalden,  Zug,  and  Lucerne,  pledged  their  faith  to  each  other  in  a 
diet  at  Lucerne  (1524),  that  they  would  defend  the  faith  of  their  fathers,  bat 
they  availed  themselves  of  the  opportunity  to  forbid  the  sale  of  indulgences,  to 
improve  the  manners  of  the  clergy,  to  limit  the  revenues  of  the  Church,  and 
to  extend  the  jurisdiction  of  the  courts  in  ecclesiastical  affiurs.  {a)  In  those 
places  which  were  under  the  direct  government  of  the  whole  confederacy,  it 
was  impossible  to  avoid  the  clashing  of  parties.  The  burning  of  images,  and 
sometimes  even  of  monasteries,  was  of  course  exceedingly  painfbl  to  the 
Gatholic  authorities,  especially  when  it  occurred  in  places  subject  to  thdr 
control.  They  therefore  took  an  oath,  that  every  one  who  treated  the  saints 
or  the  mass  in  a  contemptuous  manner  should  be  punished.  It  soon  became 
evident,  from  the  maimings  and  public  executions  they  inflicted,  that  their 
oath  was  no  idle  threat,  {h)  A  Christian  compact  was  now  formed  among 
the  Reformed  cities,  into  which  even  Strnsbnrg  and  Constance  were  adndt- 
ted.  The  five  Catholic  cantons  also  formed  an  alliance  with  Ferdinand  of 
Austria  for  the  protection  of  the  faith.  An  irruption  was  made  by  the  inhab- 
itants of  Unterwalden,  to  sustain  an  insurrection  of  the  people  in  the  upper 
port  of  Berne  against  the  Reformation  which  had  been  forced  upon  them,  (e) 
Zwinglc  now  demanded  war ;  the  cities  brought  into  the  field  a  powerM 
army,  and  the  five  cantons  purchased  peace  (June  24,  1529)  by  conceding: 
that  each  party  should  be  permitted  to  adopt  what  faith  it  pleased,  aU  slan- 
derous speeches  should  be  punished,  and  in  every  congregation  under  the 
government  of  the  general  confederacy,  a  migority  of  votes  should  dedde 
upon  religious  matters.  The  articles  of  compact  with  Austria  were  then  tom 
in  pieces,  and  with  respect  to  free  preaching,  general  promises  were  suffioient 
to  give  satisfaction,  {d)  But  it  was  never  the  intention  of  the  Catholics  to 
fulfil  these  promises  in  the  sense  in  which  they  were  understood  by  the 
people  of  Zurich,  as  the  calumnies  alluded  to  were  nothing  but  the  expres- 
sion of  a  universal  feeling.  When  the  authors  of  these  calunmies  were  there- 
fore allowed  to  remain  unpunished,  the  cities  next  forbade  all  supplies  and 
intercourse  with  the  mountainous  districts,  {e)  To  save  themselves  from 
starvation,  the  five  cantons  now  betook  themselves  to  the  sword.  Against 
this  the  cities  were  not  prepared,  and  the  Catholic  host  fell  upon  an  advanced 
outpost  of  the  army  of  Zurich  at  Cdppel  (Oct.  11, 1631).  Zwingie^  who,  during 
the  last  years  of  his  life,  had  been  threatened  in  various  ways,  was  fbU  of 
melancholy,  and  had  singular  presentiments  of  his  approaching  end.  THth 
the  least  possible  confidence  in  man,  and  the  highest  in  God  and  in  his  cause, 
he  accompanied  the  standard  of  the  city  as  the  pastor  of  his  people.  Zurich 
lost  the  biattie,  and  Zwingie  was  left  on  the  field,  surrounded  by  the 

a)  BnUinger  toI.  L  p.  142se.  218».       I)  lb.  toL  L  p.  14Saii  IStai 
c)  lb.  YoL  XL  p.  SlssL  48a&       <f)  lb.  toL  II.  p,  19BaB,  186fli. 
e)  Jb.  YoL  IL  p.  8S8n. 


CHAP.  L    REFOBMATIOar.    |88K.  SACBAMESTTASUN  COSTTBOVERST.       389 

of  the  choicest  portion  of  the  friends  of  the  Reformation  in  the  city.  (/) 
The  superior  strength  of  the  cities  was  indeed  soon  after  hronght  into  action, 
bat  the  confidence  of  victory  and  unity  was  on  the  side  of  the  Catholic 
army.  The  religious  peace  which  was  soon  afterwards  concluded  (Nov.  16), 
recognized  the  right  of  each  canton  freely  to  make  its  own  arrangements 
respecting  itsteligious  affairs,  hut  in  those  portions  which  were  under  the 
general  government,  and  in  those  cantons  which  were  hitherto  undecided,  the 
old  Chorch  was  almost  universally  restored  hy  violence.  (^) 

§  885.     The  Sacramentarian  Controcersy. 

Waiek  ToL  XTIL  p.  ISSAn.  toI.  XX.  (Selnecktr  and  ChemniU.)  IlUt.  d.  Bacnmentastr.  Lpx. 
WL  i.  Ldtehsr^  complete  Hist  motaam,  between  Lath,  and  the  Bet  Frkfl  and  Lefp.  2  cd.  172^ 
trtlk.-'Litd.  LauiUr^  II.  oootrov.  NumunenUriae.  Tig.  (1568w)  1672.  Z&r.  1564  JTo»piniani  II.  sa- 
CODL  Tl»  (U0&)  1603.  2  Th.  £  ZOr.  1611. 4— J.  Ebrard,  d.  D.  t.  h.  Abendm.  Frkt  1846.  vol  II.  i^ 
l-»& 

In  the  spirit  of  Erasmus,  and  with  a  proper  sense  of  his  own  indepen- 
dence, Zwingle  always  protested  against  being  numbered  among  the  adhe- 
rents of  Lnther.  (a)    He  could  discover  nothing  in  the  Lord's  Supper  but  a 
wffk  of  commemoration  and  fellowship.    Even  Luther  was  obliged  to  reject 
the  doctrine  of  transubstantiation  together  with  the  priesthood,  (h)  but  the 
depth  of  his  sensuous  mysticism  needed  a  spiritual  presence  of  Christ's  body 
in  the  sacred  ordinance.     CarUtadt^  during  his  iconoclastic  fury,  had  put 
forth  the  assertion  that  Ghrist  pointed  to  his  living  body  when  he  instituted 
tin  supper.    In  consequence  of  this,  a  controversy,  embittered  by  the  per- 
lOBal  relations  of  the  parties,  sprung  up  (after  1624)  between  him  and  Lu- 
ther, (r)    The  Swiss,  respecting  whose  position  the  divines  at  Wittenberg 
were  for  a  long  time  indistinctly  informed,  undertook  in  their  own  way  (after 
U26)  the  defence  of  the  severely-persecuted  Carlstadt.    Zwingle  translated 
**thi8  is^  by  the  words  ^^this  signifies,''  and  Occolampadius  regarded  the 
hread  when  called  the  body,  simply  as  the  symbol  of  the  body.    These  dif- 
fsrent  views  led  to  a  dispute  between  Luther  and  Zwingle  at  the  head  of 
their  respective  parties.  (</)    The  Swiss  Confederacy  adhered  to  Zwingle,  and 
the  imperial  cities  of  Upper  Germany  were  disposed  to  do  so,  but  the  doc- 
trine of  Luther  found  a  trusty  and  influential  advocate  in  Suabia  in  the  per- 
Ha  of  Brentz,  a  man  who  would  listen  neither  to  the  fathers  nor  to  Aristotle, 
Int  to  Christ  alone,  (e)    Luther  appealed  with  absolute  confidence  to  the 
letter,  Zwingle  to  the  sense  of  the  word  of  God.    The  first  was  boisterous 
>Bd  iometimes  ludicrous,  while  the  latter  was  more  polished  but  bitter, 
^hen  Zwingle  referred  to  the  nature  of  a  body,  Luther  endeavored  to  show 

/)  Kom  B«aebr.  d.  6  kath.  Orte  Kriega.  {BaWiasar,  Helvetia,  vol  IL  p.  186m.)    BuiUngtr  toL 
Dipt  n6«.— (iZ  Gther)  Die  Schlacht  d.  KappeL  ZQr.  1881. 
I)  ladta^er  vol.  IIL  p.  247.    UoUinger  vol  IL  Commencement 
if)  ExplanaUoo  of  the  18th  arUcIa  1528.  (vol  I.  p.  2S5.) 
()  Ik  WdU  ToL  IL  p.  577. 
^  Watek  roL  XY.  p.  2422iM.  vol  XX.  p.  186fls.    Comp.  Oibd  In  Stud.  u.  Krit  1S41  H.  2. 

*)  &■.  Arnica  exegeein  Ti^  1527.  4    LuOl  Dan  die  Worte  ChrUti :  daa  ist  m.  Leib.,  noch  fest- 
*^  Weder  die  Schwarmgcister.  WiL  1527.  and  others. 
')  Sprtafina  Snevicnm.  1525.    Gompi  J.  Ilartmann  and  JT.  Jdg^Tt  J.  Brenti.  Ilamb.  l^ifl.  vol 


390  MODERN  CHimCH  HI8T0BT.    FER.  Y.    A.  D.  ISH-IMSL 

tbat  the  body  of  CLrist  was  omnipresent  in  consequence  of  its  inseparable 
onion  with  the  Deity,  and  the  assertion  of  his  opponent  seemed*  to  him 
equivalent  to  a  denial  of  Christ  This  controversy,  therefore,  inasmuch  as  It 
had  its  origin  in  the  peculiar  mental  character  of  these  great  leaders,  and  yet 
was  not  of  much  importance  to  the  interests  of  piety  itself,  became  finally  so 
prominent  as  to  produce  a  complete  misunderstanding  between  the  dispu- 
tants. In  vain  did  the  Landgrave  endeavor  to  effect  a  reconciliation,  re- 
minding thcin  that  their  common  danger  should  keep  them  united.  (/)  At 
the  meeting  which  took  place  between  them  at  Marburg  (Oct.,  1529), 
Zwingle  was  induced  by  the  strength  of  his  convictions  with  tears  to  ofier 
Luther  his  flratemal  hand,  even  if  the  principal  point  of  difference  should 
remain  undecided,  but  this  was  rejected,  {g}  The  principal  pointe  of  their 
common  faith  were,  however,  arranged  in  fourteen  articles  on  the  basis  of 
the  Confession  of  Augsburg.  With  regard  to  the  memorable  fifteenth  arti- 
cle, which  asserts  that  Christ's  body  and  blood  are  corporally  present  in  the 
Lord's  Supper,  both  parties  promised  to  exercise  Christian  charity  so  far  as 
the  conscience  of  each  would  permit.  The  Landgrave  now  became  a  mem- 
ber of  the  league  of  the  reformed  cities  (April,  1630).  Although  Strass- 
burg,  Constance,  Meiningen,  and  Lindau  presented  their  separate  eonfessioii 
at  Augsburg  (July  11,  1580X  (A)  they  acknowledged  in  it  that  the  souls  of 
believers  were  nourished  by  the  true  body  of  Christ.  The  pliant  Jfartm 
Bacer  reconciled  matters  by  introducing  the  acknowledgment  of  a  presenoe 
of  Christ  also  for  the  hand  and  the  mouth.  (/)  By  this  means  the  cities  of 
Upper  Germany  were  induced  to  adopt  the  Confession  of  Augsburg, 
enter  into  the  League  of  Smalkald.  (1581). 

in.    ESTABUSHMSNT  OF  THE  LxTTHEBAN  CmiSCn  UNTIL  1555. 

§  886.    Articles  of  Smalkald, 

As  the  only  method  by  which  peace  could  bo  secured,  the  emperor 
demanded  that  the  pope  should  call  a  general  council.    It  was,  howevi 
feared  at  Rome  that  the  complaints  of  the  several  nations  might  in  a  gem 
assembly  of  the  Church  unite  with  the  voices  of  tlie  Protestants,  or  tbat 
latter  might  be  so  used  by  others  as  to  compel  the  papacy  to  make  soi 
general  concessions.     Clertient  VJI.  held  out  promises  which  were  intended 
only  to  prevent  the  calling  of  a  national  council  in  Germany,  and  Paul 
sent  forth  a  call  for  a  council  in  May,  1537,  to  assemble  at  Mantua^  at  a  ti: 
when  such  a  council  was  hardly  possible  in  Lombardy  on  account  qf  the 
with  France.    A  confession  was  laid  before  the  league  at  SmaUciiM,  m{ 
(Feb.  15,  1537)  by  the  theologians  there  present,  and  intended  to  be  pw 
sented  to  the  general  council,  or  otherwise  to  remain  a  new  monument  of  their 


/)  De  WfUe  vol.  III.  p.  465s. 

g)  Acts  In  Walch  vol  XVIL  p.  28618^  Corp.  Ref.  vol  I.  p.  1095u.  BitHinffw  rot  U  ^ 
22858L— Die  15  Marl).  Artlkel  nach  d.  Orig.  v^rOffenfl.  v.  J7  IT^ppe,  Marb.  1848L  4.  (Zeflseb.  f  M* 
Th.  184a  H.  l.)—L.  J.  K.  SchmUl,  d.  Kellgionsgwpr.  in  Mart.  Marb.  1840. 

A)  Conf.  TetrapoIItana.  Arg.  1681.  4.  iyiemeyer,  Col.  Conft  Lps.  ISia  p.  LXXXIIL  174te 

0  ITciIcA  ToL  XVIL  p.  S491M. 


CHAP.  L    BEFOBMATION.    $  8M.  ABTICLE8  OF  8MALKALD.  391 

QDADimitj.  (a)  These  Articles  of  Smalkald  were  composed  by  Lnther  when 
Tiolence  was  no  longer  to  be  appreliended,  and  reconciliation  was  impossible, 
and  they  present  the  doctrines  opposed  to  the  Romish  Church  in  the  strong- 
est terms.  In  addition  to  this,  by  request  of  the  Leagae,  a  tract  was  pre- 
pared in  Latin  by  Melancthon^  in  which  it  was  proved  from  historical  facts 
that  neither  the  primacy  of  the  pope  nor  the  jurisdiction  of  the  bishops  had 
been  instituted  by  divine  authority.  This  treatise  was  designed  to  be  the 
irst  formal  attempt  to  justify  those  who  solemnly  renounced  all  papal  and 
prelatical  sway.  But  its  author  had  the  courage  to  subscribe  Luther^s  arti- 
cles, with  the  remark  that  for  the  sake  of  general  peace,  a  superiority  over 
those  bishops  who  had  been  created  by  human  authority  might  be  volunta- 
rily conceded  to  the  pope  if  he  allowed  the  gospel  to  be  preached  in  its  purity. 
Luther,  overwhelmed  by  sufferings  caused  by  the  gravel,  left  Smalkald  with 
these  parting  words :  ^^  May  God  fill  you  with  hatred  for  the  pope  I  He 
knows  his  people,  and  feels  like  them  I  "  The  confederates  were  unanimous 
in  the  conclusion  that  they  were  bound  to  decline  a  council  which  met  in 
Italy,  and  which  contained  a  condemnation  of  their  cause  in  the  very  terms 
in  wMoh  it  was  called  together,  (h) 

{  837.    ProgreM  and  Political  Power  of  the  Reformation, 

In  Electoral  Saxony,  John  Frederic  the  Magnanimous^  a  conscientious,  sin- 
cere, and  truly  pious  prince,  with  a  mind  somewhat  contracted,  but  heroic  in 
purpose  and  in  endurance,  succeeded  his  father  (1582).  Philip  of  Hesse,  on 
Siis  own  responsibility,  but  sustained  by  the  power  of  the  Protestant  Leagoe, 
&n  a  sudden  expedition  reinstated  (1684)  Ulrich^  Duke  of  Wurtemberg,  who 
Jud  been  driven  ftom  his  possessions,  which  had  been  given  to  Austria  by  the 
Suabian  League.    Ul riches  refractory  spirit  had  in  misfortune  found  conso- 
Xation  in  the  gospel,  and  the  Reformation  which  had  for  a  long  time  been  kept 
^own  by  violence,  after  a  little  vacillation  suddenly  became  victorious  in 
Wurtemberg  under  the  direction  of  Brentz,  a  man  who  possessed  the  same 
"Views  as  Luther,  (a)    A  Holp  League  was  formed  (1538)  at  Nuremberg,  com- 
posed of  the  Archbishops  of  Mentz  and  of  Salzburg,  the  Duke  of  Bavaria, 
<jeorge  of  Saxony,  and  Henry  of  Brunswick.    But  the  power  of  the  emperor 
continued  to  be  much  restrained  by  his  foreign  wars.    A  considerable  sup- 
jNNrt  was  obtained  for  the  Protestant  League  in  the  Northern  kingdoms,  and 
splendid  promises  were  held  out  to  it  by  Henry  of  England  and  Francis  of 
jEVance.     George  of  Sa^cony^  whose  spirit  became  every  year  more  and  more 
fBmbittered  toward  Luther  and  the  age  in  which  he  lived,  struggled  in  vain 
against  what  seemed  to  be  his  destiny,  for  he  was  obliged  to  leave  his  pos- 
Bons  to  a  Protestant  heir.    His  brother  Henry  already  belonged  to  the 


a)  M.  Mturer^  <L  Tag.  zn  Smalk.  n.  d.  Schm.  Artikel  Lpa.  1887. 

h)  Walch  Tol.  XYL  p.  2426W.    Corp.  Ref.  vol  II.  p.  962bs.  982as.    AonU  Palcarii  de  Cone. 

It.  et  Hbero  Epi  ed.  UL  IUg«n,  Lp&  183'i.  4 

a)  achnurrer,  Erliot.  d.  WOrt.  K.  Bef.  u.  OelAhrten-Oench.  TQb.  1799.  J.  C.  Schmidt  it  F.  E. 
r,  Deokw.  d.  w&rt  a.  ochwab.  Set  Geech.  TQt.  1817.  (Qruixeiaen)  Denkblatt  d.  B«f.  in  Stattg. 
Stottf.  1885u  J.  HarUnann,  Gescb.  d.  Ret  in  Wurt  Stuttg.  I8861.  Jlartmann  a.  Jiiger,  J.  Bnntx, 
Bmb.  1842.  ToL  IL    jL  F.  Heyd^  Ulr.  H.  ro  WOrt  Tilb.  1S41-4. 8  toIb. 


392  MODERN  CHUBOH  HISTOBY.    FB&  Y.    A.  D.  1517-ltML 

League  of  Smalkald,  and  on  the  festival  of  Pentecost,  1689,  Lnther  and  th* 
Reformation  entered  the  dty  of  Leipdo  in  triumph,  (b)  The  EUetor  of  Brtm- 
denhurg  compelled  his  wife  to  fly  from  his  residence  that  she  might  live  in 
the  ei^oyment  of  her  faith,  and  exacted  an  oath  from  his  sons  that  they  would 
deave  to  the  ancient  &ith  in  opposition  to  modem  innovations.  But  Jm- 
ehim  II.  (1686)  allowed  the  word  of  Gk)d  to  have  free  toleration  in  his  do- 
minions, and  in  1689  partook  of  the  Lord's  Supper  according  to  the  forms  of 
the  Evangelical  Ohurch,  although  he  preserved  an  independent  poaituMi 
unconnected  with  the  League.  That  hody,  however,  was  soon  after  (after 
1646)  strengthened  hy  the  accession  of  the  Bleetaral  Palatinate,  (e)  Whea 
the  bishopric  of  Naumhurg  became  vacant,  Julita  van  Pflug^  the  provost  of 
the  cathedral,  a  learned  and  at  the  same  time  a  mild  divine,  (d)  was  elected 
by  the  chapter,  but  the  elector  could  not  resist  the  temptation  to  provide  for 
it  an  apostolic  bishop.  Nicolas  von  Anudorf,  by  an  act  of  arbitrary  power 
was  invested  with  the  office  of  a  bishop,  but  with  the  salary  oi  a  pastor,  and 
Luther  boasted  that  he  and  his  friends  had  been  guilty  of  the  sin  of  oonse* 
crating  a  bishop  without  chrism,  and  even  without  suet,  lard,  tar,  grease,  in- 
cense, or  coals,  (e)  An  electoral  officer  was  appointed  to  administer  the  aeon- 
lar  affairs  of  the  diocese.  Henry  of  Brunswick  and  the  Protestant  prinoeSi 
assisted  by  Luther,  assailed  each  other  by  pamphlets,  in  which  all  the  pro- 
prieties not  only  of  princely  dignity  but  of  human  life  were  violated,  and  when 
Henry  threatened  Groslar,  he  was  attacked  by  Saxony  and  Hesse  with  a  pow- 
erful army,  driven  from  his  dominions  (1642),  and  finally  made  a  prisoner 
(1646).  (/)  Among  the  secular  princes  Bavaria  was  the  only  power  which 
continued  to  support  the  papacy,  and  even  there  much  difficulty  was  expe- 
rienced in  resisting  the  opposition  of  the  people  and  the  states.  Qf)  Herman^ 
the  Elector  of  Cologne^  commenced  with  a  Catholic  reform,  but  he  finally 
assumed  a  Protestant  position,  and  the  archbishop  was  informed  of  his  plan 
of  refbnnation  according  to  a  form  drawn  up  by  Bucer  and  Melancthon 
(1648).  {h)  Cardinal  Albert  of  MenUt  allowed  the  Reformation  to  go  for- 
ward in  his  Chapters  of  Magdeburg  and  Halberstadt  as  long  as  the  states 
were  willing  to  assume  the  payment  of  hb  debts  (1641).  All  bishops  were 
tempted  to  go  over  to  the  Protestant  side  by  the  prospect  of  becoming  here- 
ditary princes.  King  Ferdinand  himself,  influenced  by  the  writings  of  La- 
ther, and  by  a  father  confessor,  who,  on  his  deathbed,  repented  of  his  whde 
ecclesiastical  life  and  actions  as  a  deception,  now  promised  to  oompromlse 


h)  Kobbey  Heinr.  d.  Fromme,  Lps.  1889.    O.  R  Winer,  de  F«oalt  theoL  ev.  in  Unlr.  Upc 
nib.  LpA.  1S89.  4    JT.  W.  Ilerinff,  Oeach.  der  im  Markg.  Meissen  a.  d.  dua  gehOr.  tb&r.  KrdM  mt 
Ect  Groeaonbafn.  1889.     If.  G.  JJatte,  Abrfss  d  melnnelsch-albert  sfisch.  KOeseh.  Jjp^  1847.  toL  IL 

c)  Ad,  Mm^,  Oeseh.  d.  Bef.  in  d.  Mark  Brandenb.  BrL  1889.  J.  SeMaddHtck,  d.  n«bMtr.  d. 
Kar£  Joacb.  z.  luth.  K.  Lps.  1840.—//.  AUinff,  H.  Eca  Palatinae.  (Monn.  plet  et  lit  Fre£  170L  i.) 
R  G.  Slruve,  B«r.  v.  d.  PfSlx.  K.  Ilbt  FrkC  1721.  4.  JT.  F,  VUrordt,  OMcb.  d.  Bet  im  Ora«ik.  Bft- 
den.  Karlsr.  1847. 

d)  a  O.  MUUr,  de  merifcte  Jalft  PflugIL  Lpa.  1819L 

e)  r(ilcAvoLXVILp.8l8&e6pec{allyl2SM.  /^r^CMMMiM,  Ncoe  Mlttb.  biit  aatt<|.  Fonoh.  Bri. 
18S5.  vol.  IL  P.  2.  {UjMiM)  Bcricht  a.  d.  Wahl  a.  ElnfQbr.  NIo.  r.  A.  Nordb.  1686. 

/)  Walch  VOL  XVIL  p.  1M8«.  IforOedsr  Bach.  lY.  W.  SUUr,  Chankterlttik  Heter.  d.  Jiie 
Marb.l84A.       g)  ITifiter  ($  828.  nt  a) 

h)  M,  Decker*,  Herm.  t.  Wied.  Erzb.  v.  EGln.  Gologiie.  1840. 


CHAP.  L    REFORMATION.    1 88&    NEGOTIATIONS.    If AUBICR  393 

fluttan  with  respect  to  religion,  with  the  states  at  an  imperial  diet,  and  in 
•ooordanee  with  Lather^s  connsel.  (i)  Aside  from  porsonal  iQclinations  nothing 
but  the  necessity  of  adhering  to  Catholicism  under  which  the  House  of  Hap^- 
hirg  was  placed  on  aocoont  of  its  connection  with  Spain,  Belgium,  and  Italy, 
was  safficient  at  that  time  to  nphold  that  religion  in  any  part  of  Germany. 

{  838.    NtgotiationM/or  Peace  and  Preparatione  for  War, 

Once  more  was  presented  some  prospect  of  preserving  the  Church  from  a 
^▼ision.    Divines  of  hoth  parties  were  appointed  hy  the  emperor  at  the  Diet 
of  Ratuban  (1&41)  to  adjust  measures  for  a  peaceful  accommodation.    The 
pbos  Contarinif  who  was  fiivorable  to  the  Amdamental  doctrines  of  Protes- 
tantisni  as  they  were  then  maintained,  had  been  appointed  legate,  (a)    With 
Us  approbation  a  compromise  was  proposed  by  Oratella^  in  which  it  was 
averted  that  salvation  was  founded  upon  faith  in  the  merits  of  Christ  alone, 
and  not  upon  our  own  works  or  deserts.    The  divines  were  therefore  agreed 
with  respect  to  the  four  Articles  of  Original  Righteousness,  Original  Sin,  Hu- 
man liberty,  and  Justification,  which  Luther  had  always  maintained  as  the 
ftradamental  principles  of  Christianity.    With  reference  to  otlier  subjects  on 
which  no  agreement  was  yet  attained,  and  with  respect  to  which  the  proposed 
seheme  conceded  every  thing  which  could  be  given  up  by  the  Catholics  of 
that  period  without  renouncing  their  distinctive  character,  the  emperor  re- 
quired that  until  the  decision  of  a  general  council  could  be  obtained,  all  should 
extfdse  fraternal  forbearance  toward  each  other.    The  Landgrave  and  the 
Eleetor  of  Brandenburg  were  entirely  agreed,  and  Juliue  Pflng  and  Melanethon 
were  just  on  the  point  of  extending  to  each  other  the  hand  of  reconciliation. 
Bat  Lnther  and  the  £lector  of  Saxony  saw  nothing  in  all  these  concessions 
bat  a  snare ;  the  King  of  France,  alarmed  at  the  prospect  of  a  reconciliation 
b  Germany,  complained  of  treachery  to  the  Church ;  and  the  legate,  threat- 
ened from  Rome  for  having  transcended  his  powers,  made  a  retrograde  move- 
ment Qf)    This  result  was  only  the  manifestation  of  opposing  principles  in 
the  person  of  their  advocates,  and  in  this  failure  of  a  reconciliation  which 
■eemed  so  near,  all  became  distinctly  conscious  that  the  schism  was  irrccon- 
cfltble.    The  emperor  concluded  at  Crespy  (1544)  an  honorable  peace  with 
Fhnoe,  and  the  Roman  King  a  five  years'  armistice  with  the  Turks.     In  the 
Uagoe  of  Smalkald  the  cities  began  to  complain  of  the  princes,  and  unkind 
Mugs  were  produced  in  various  ways.    Maurice^  a  keen  ambitious  youn^ 
Bum,  had  succeeded  (1541)  his  father  in  the  dukedom  of  Saxony.    Although 
^  regarded  the  Reformation  in  the  light  of  an  historical  necessity  he  felt  no 
CBthmiasm  in  its  behalf,  and  while  personally  disputing  with  the  elector  he 

i)  /<rtt  an  LutlL  1.  Febr.  1587.  in  Walch  toL  XVL  p.  M84 

«)  Ctmiarmi  Tr.  de  jnsUficatlooe.  Par.  1571.  Beccatetto,  YiU  del  C.  Cont  With  bis  Letten 
^•'  Kvpi  BagiB.  Poll,  ed.  QuiHni.  toL  UL''Ki4din0,  ad  Qatr.  Ep.  de  Cont  purtoris  doctr.  de  Jostlt 
^cteonfeMore.  Lpa.  1749. 

^)  AeU  Colloqafi  in  Oomttito  BatU^nae  babitL  (od.  Buoer.)  Argent  1541.  4.  AcU  In  Conrenta 
'■tt*.  (cd.  M^UimeOoH,)  Wit  IMl.  4.  Compi  HortUd^r  voL  1. 1, 87.  Waleh  vol  XVI L  p.  eSSaa 
^V^  B^  ToL  IT.  pi  119ml  In  oppoaition  to  Buc«r :  Bckii  ApoL  pro  Prindpibos  oath.  Ingidat 
^-Rajfnaid.  ad  aon.  1541.  Seotend,  III,  88.  Ranks,  Pipite.  vol  I.  pi  ISOai.  BrstichnsUUr, 
^^ K. Ocipr.  angeC  ni  Wonna»  Ibrtg.  la  B^.  (Zaitiebr.  t  hiat  Tlk  vol  IL  P.  L) 


394  MODERN  CHUBCn  HISTOBT.    PER.  Y.    A.  Dl  1617-lMa 

abandoned  the  Leagae  of  Bmalkald  (1642),  and  seeretlj  pledged  himself  to 
the  emperor  that  whatever  might  be  the  issne  of  the  war,  the  imperial  au- 
thority flliould  in  no  respect  be  impaired,  (e)  The  Conncil  which  was  opened 
at  Trent  (1545)  was  rejected  by  the  Protestants.  Legal  proceedings  by  order 
of  the  emperor,  and  on  complaint  of  the  Chapter  of  Oologne,  were  instituted 
against  tlio  archbishop  of  that  see.  It  was  soon  evident  from  the  execution 
of  some  evangelical  preachers  in  the  Kotherlands  that  he  was  in  earnest  He, 
however,  persuaded  himself  that  his  conduct  sprung  more  from  a  referenoe  to, 
liberty  than  to  Lutheran  ism,  and  to  the  property  than  to  the  doctrine  of  the 
Chnrcli.  Indeed,  the  complicated  condition  in  which  the  material  interests 
of  all  parties  were  placed,  stood  very  much  in  the  way  of  an  amicable  adjust- 
ment of  other  tilings.  But  when  it  had  become  apparent  that  the  posiUon 
of  the  respective  parties  at  the  diet  rendered  the  adoption  of  any  general 
measures  almost  impossible,  and  when  the  decision  of  the  imperial  oounoil 
which  treated  the  proceedings  respecting  ecclesiastical  property  as  a  mere 
matter  of  spoils,  had  been  rejected  by  the  Protestants,  it  was  evident  that 
the  empire  was  indeed  divided,  and  that  the  peace  of  the  country  was  de* 
stroyed. 

§  389.    Luther  8  Death  and  Public  Character. 

The  lost  years  of  Luther^s  life  were  spent  in  great  exhaustion  and  pro- 
tracted sickness.  He  was  so  much  offended  at  the  immorality  and  luxury 
which  prevailed  at  Wittenberg,  that  he  left  that  city  (1545)  and  returned  only 
on  the  urgent  request  of  the  University  and  the  elector.  He  foresaw  that 
troublous  times  were  approaching  his  native  country,  and  he  longed  to  depart 
in  peace.  His  last  days,  however,  were  illuminated  by  some  beams  of  his 
former  power,  and  he  still  indulged  in  bold,  childlike  pleasantries,  even  in  the 
midst  of  sublime  conceptions,  (a)  Having  been  invited  to  Eisleben  to  act  as 
umpire  between  the  Counts  of  Mansfeld,  he  gently  and  devoutly  fell  asleep 
on  the  night  of  the  18th  of  February,  1546.  (()  The  sudden  changes  which 
took  place  during  his  career,  and  in  which  he  was  obliged  to  act  as  a  leader) 
produced  marked  contrasts  between  different  periods  of  his  life.  The  pope 
was  regarded  by  him  at  one  time  as  the  most  saintly,  and  at  another  as  the 
most  fiendish  father.  When  he  was  excited  with  passion  his  foelings  changed 
in  the  most  boisterous  manner.  His  whole  life  was  devoted  to  the  promo* 
tion  of  intellectual  freedom,  and  yet  he  was  zealous  in  behalf  of  the  letter* 
Relying  wholly  upon  spiritual  influences  while  giving  laws  to  the  most  turbu- 
lent storms  of  revolution,  he  nevertheless  occasionally  advised  that  the  pope 
with  all  his  menials  should  be  cast  into  the  Tyrrhene  Sea.  (c)  His  opinions 
were  always  expressed  with  absolute  sincerity,  and  he  was  an-utter  stranger 

c)  G.  Arnold,  Vita  Kaur.  {Mmken.  toI.  IL)  Brandt,  Vindieiae  Manritlanae.  Jen.  1617.  4  F. 
A.  V.  Langentu,  Moritz,  Ilerzog  Q.  KarC  zu  Sachs.  Lps.  1841.  2  Tola.  H.  B.  Btandea,  Beitrr.  &  Cbar- 
akter.  d.  H.  u.  Churf.  M.  Lpa.  1853. 

a)  Especially  his  Letters  to  Catharine :  De  Wette  vol  V.  pp.  788.  787.  789. 

b)  J.  Jonu  u.  J/;  Cdiil  Berlcht  v.  Lutberi  Abstcrben.  Besides  other  reoords  of  his  death  f  n  Wakh 
Tol  XXI.  p.  274W91  J.  Janan,  Schr.  an  Job.  Fr.  Q.  Luth.  Lobenseude,  hrvg:  v.  Kreyaig,  Meiaa.  1S47. 
—Mohnikf,  L.  Lebcnscnde.  Strals.  1817.    K.  A.  Credntr^  L.  Tod  a.  Bedentung.  Frkt  18M. 

0)  Walch  vol.  XYIL  p.  189688. 


CHAP.  L    REFORMATION.    1 889.  LUTH]£R*9  DEATH  AND  CHABACTEB.      395 

to  tfery  form  of  earthly  interest.  By  a  vigorous  sensnonsness  of  disposition 
he  stood  firmly  rooted  in  the  earth,  while  his  head  reached  into  the  heavens. 
No  one  of  his  age  equalled  hira  in  creative  power,  his  style  was  frequently 
nnigher  than  even  that  rough  period  seemed  to  have  allowed,  hut  in  popular 
eloquence  he  had  no  8U])erior  in  all  Germany.  The  eagerness  and  passion 
which  he  always  felt  in  the  midst  of  his  conflicts,  supplied  him  with  the  en- 
joyment which  he  needed  in  them.  Wherever  he  discovered  injustice  he  saw 
nothing  but  hell  itself.  His  services,  however,  did  not  consist  so  much  in  his 
rlostroying  and  breaking  loose  from  what  was  wrong, — for  many  others  extri- 
cated themselves  from  the  ancient  Church  with  much  more  facility  and  deci- 
Mon,  —as  in  his  constructive  power,  and  in  the  exuberance  of  his  warm  faith 
and  love.  And  yet  there  were  some  periods  of  great  trial  in  his  life,  when 
the  temptations  of  the  devil  made  him  fear  that  he  should  be  bereft  of  God 
and  Christ,  and  every  thing  dear,  (d)  He  had  no  hesitation  even  in  the  pres- 
ence of  his  opponents  freely  to  avow  the  deliberate  conviction  of  his  heart, 
tlurt  be  was  well  known  in  heaven,  earth,  and  hell,  as  the  chosen  instrument 
of  God  for  the  accomplishment  of  the  divine  purposes,  and  yet  this  seemed 
to  have  nothing  to  do  with  his  individual  person.  lie  never  wished  to  hear  of 
Lutheran  doctrines,  (e)  and  his  sublime  confidence  in  God  never  appeared  to 
asinre  him  of  his  own  deliverance  from  danger,  but  simply  to  convince  him 
that  God  was  able  to  raise  up  every  day  ten  such  men  as  I>r.  Martinus,  (/) 
The  time  Jn  which  such  a  man  should  bo  vilified  by  absurd  reproaches,  or 
defended  by  iDiberal  vindications,  has  now  passed  away,  and  he  should  be  re- 
garde<l,  not  as  the  property  of  an  individual  party,  but  of  the  German  nation 
and  of  Christianity. 

§  840.     The  Smalkaldic  War,     154C,  1547. 

BorOsder  vol.  IL  book  III.  And  pajare  161Ss8.  Walch  voL  XYIT.  p.  1817n.  Oftmerarii  Oomm. 
Mli  SnuUc.  grmece  acr.  {Frefur  Th.  III.  p.  457.)  Literary  hist  of  the  accoants  of  the  war  in  Uksrt 
ToL  IL  pc  ISMl— i/.  G.  Jahn^  Oesch.  d.  schmalk.  Kriegs.  Lp<L  1837. 

An  edict  was  proclaimed  by  the  diet  (July  20, 1546),  in  which  the  Elector 
of  Saxony  and  the  Landgrave  of  Hesse  were  declared  guilty  of  high  treason 
Against  the  emperor  and  the  empire.  Although  the  emperor  was  very  care- 
fbl  not  to  give  his  expedition  the  name  of  a  religious  war,  Paul  III.  openly 
proclaimed  a  crusade  for  the  extermination  of  heretics,  and  called  for  olfer- 
ings  from  the  Church  for  this  purpose.  An  army  was  htistily  assembled  l^y 
the  Protestants  on  the  borders  of  Suabia  and  Bavaria,  which  was  much 
nperior  to  that  of  the  emperor  posted  at  first  neai*  Ratisbon,  and  afterwards 
occupying  a  strong  position  near  Landshut.  But  as  many  persons  had  an 
equal  right  to  command,  and  many  things  were  presented  for  consideration, 
the  hour  for  successful  action  was  allowed  to  pass,  and  time  was  afforded  for 
the  emperor  to  collect  around  him  his  forces  from  Spain,  Italy,  and  the  Neth- 
erlands. Even  then,  however,  the  forces  were  neariy  equal,  but  the  Protes- 
ttnt  princes  shrunk  from  the  blow  which  was  to  decide  their  fate.  Just  at 
that  time  news  was  received  that  Duke  Maurice  had  taken  possession  of  the 


d)  Walch  Tol.  Xn.  p.  82708L    MattKe^iu*,  12.  Predigt  p.  1888. 

tf)  WiOch  ToL  X.  p.  42a  ToL  XV.  p.  1989.      /)  Ih  Wett^  vol  V.  p.  787. 


396  MODERN  CHUBCH  HISTOBT.    PER.  Y.    A.  D.  lS17-lMa 

Electorate  of  Saxony  under  the  pretence  of  preventing  a  similar  act  by  the 
King  of  the  Romans.  This  induced  the  elector  to  hasten  back  to  Saiony ; 
late  in  the  fiiU  the  allied  army  was  disbanded,  and  one  city  after  another  im- 
plored  pardon  fh>m  the  emperor,  or  purchased  it  with  various  offerings,  nntU 
the  victory  on  his  side  was  by  no  means  difficult.  The  Elector  of  Ck>Iogne, 
excommunicated  by  the  pope,  menaced  by  the  emperor,  and  abandoned  by  his 
estates,  laid  aside  his  office  (Feb.  25,  1547).  (a)  By  the  commencement  of 
the  succeeding  spring  the  whole  of  Southern  Germany  had  been  reduced  to 
submission  without  a  single  blow.  John  Frederic  had  in  the  mean  time  taken 
possession  of  his  own  dominions  as  well  as  those  of  his  cousin  with  the  ex- 
ception  of  Dresden  and  Leipsic,  but  he  was  not  blind  to  the  fiite  impending 
over  him.  And  yet  even  in  this  extremity  the  princes  did  not  think  of  the 
only  means  of  deliverance  now  remaining  to  them,  which  was  an  appeal  to 
the  people  to  rise  in  defence  of  their  faith,  (h)  While  the  elector  was  sur- 
rounded only  by  the  vassals  and  mercenaries  which  composed  his  ordinaiy 
urmy  he  was  surprised  by  the  emperor  in  the  forest  of  Lochau  near  Muhlkerg 
(Apr.  24,  1547),  and  compelled  to  run  the  chance  of  a  battle.  His  army  wis 
completely  destroyed,  and  he  himself  was  taken  prisoner.  His  life  was  pur- 
chased  by  the  surrender  of  Wittenberg  and  the  abdication  of  his  crown.  The 
electorate  and  a  part  of  the  dominions  of  Ernest  were  bestowed  upon  Man- 
rice.  The  landgrave  surrendered  at  discretion  (June  19),  and  contrary  to  his 
own  expectation,  and  in  spite  of  the  security  given  by  his  son-in-law,  he  was 
retained  in  close  confinement  {c)  The  other  members  of  the  League,  with 
the  exception  of  a  few  cities  of  Lower  Germany,  now  also  submitted. 

§  841.     The  Interim. 

SUk,  d.  dreifkche  Interim.  Lpa.  1781.    J.  Schmid,  Hist  Interimlstica.  HlmsL  1780.    SpUt^r, 
Beltrr.  z.  Oeach.  d.  Angsb.  Int  (ZeltMh.  t  hlat  Tb.  1851.  U.  &) 

The  emperor  allowed  of  no  interruption  of  the  forms  of  worship  adopted 
in  the  several  countries  which  he  had  conquered,  (a)  and  appeared  anxious  to 
make  good  his  previous  assurance  that  he  had  no  design  to  interfere  in  matters 
of  faith.  This  policy  may  have  originated  either  in  his  desire  to  force  the 
pope  to  enter  upon  a  general  reform,  or  in  his  conviction  that  such  snbjed<< 
were  beyond  his  jurisdiction.  The  only  thing  which  he  demanded  was  that 
all  should  agree  to  submit  to  the  authority  of  a  general  council  at  which  he 
engaged  that  all  should  receive  reasonable  and  Christian  treatment.  Bot 
with  the  view  of  re-estabUshing  by  his  own  authority  the  unity  of  the  West 
em  Church,  he  published  at  Aug$burg  (March  15,  1548)  an  imperial  edict,  in 
which  directions  were  prescribed  respecting  the  way  in  which  all  mat 
ters  relating  to  religion  should  be  arranged  until  the  deciaon  of  the  coondL  (ft) 


a)  Deckert^  Hens.  v.  Wied.  p.  1488a. 

b)  Comp.  Rommel,  PbiUpfx  Urkundenb.  p.  825. 

c)  For  evideoee  of  deception :  L.  G.  Mogen,  H.  CkptiTttotU  Ph.  Frc£  1786.  MUmumH  roL  IV.  pi 
880m.  In  bvor  of  a  mlsundersUnding :  Raumer  toL  I.  p.  5478ft.  Oeach.  Ear.  Lpa.  1882.  toL  L  p 
547aa.  For  an  intenUonal  decepUon :  Ranhe  tc^  IV.  p  408Ba.  Comp.  Rommsl  In  d.  MonatbL  & 
Allg.  Zeitung,  April,  1846. 

a)  Comp.  Buffenhagen,  Wie  ea  vna  sn  Wittenberg  gegang<«n  iat  in  d.  rergangiMQ  Krieg.  1547. 4 

b)  BUk,  p  86«aaL    Form  aaoror.  emend,  a  J.  Pflogio  propoatta,  ed.  A  (?.  JfAIIer,  h^  IStVi. 


CHAP.  L    BEFOBUATION.    $  ^i-  INTEBIBl    $  941L  MAURICE.  397 

This  Interim,  which  had  been  composed  by  Julias  von  Pflng,  with  the  assistance 
of  Agricola,  the  court  preacher  of  Brandenburg,  and  was  originally  intended 
by  the  emperor  for  the  Oatholic  as  well  as  for  the  Protestant  states,  conceded 
the  marriage  of  the  clergy,  the  use  of  the  cup  in  the  sacrament,  and  some 
indefinite  constructions  of  particular  doctrines  of  the  Oatholic  Church.  8uoh 
concessions  were  regarded  by  the  emperor  as  of  vital  importance,  and  yet 
their  value  was  much  impaired  by  the  condition  that  the  property  of  the 
Church  was  not  to  be  restored  until  the  terms  were  agreed  upon  in  an  amica- 
ble settlement.  Only  two  of  the  inferior  princes  ventured  openly  to  oppose 
this  proceeding  in  the  diet  itself^  and  John,  Margrave  of  Brandenburg,  with  a 
lofty  earnestness  and  a  bitter  raiDery,  avowed  his  disgust  at  the  noxious  com- 
pound thus  prepared  for  them,  (c)  In  many  of  the  cities  of  Upper  Germany 
the  Interim  was  carried  into  effect  by  violence  and  threats,  but  its  general 
execution  would  have  required  another  war,  and  one  too  in  direct  opposition 
to  the  people.  Those  who  had  formerly  preached  the  reformed  doctrines  were 
now  compelled  to  wander  abroad,  and  in  some  instances  they  were  perse- 
cuted. ((f)  John  Frederic,  who  now  displayed  a  heroic  constancy  and  devo- 
tion in  his  confinement,  rejected  not  only  the  authority  of  the  Interim,  but 
that  of  the  council  ako.  The  answer  of  Maurice,  so  for  as  it  related  to  his 
raljects  was  evasive,  but  he  exhorted  his  states  and  the  divines  to  concede  all 
that  could  be  given  up  with  a  good  conscience.  It  was  principally  in  conse- 
qnence  of  this  advice  that  the  Leipsie  Interim  was  drawn  up  under  the  di- 
rection of  Melancthon,  in  which  every  thing  decidedly  contrary  to  evangelical 
doctrine  was  declined,  but  the  greater  part  of  the  Catholic  ritual  was  con- 
ceded, on  the  ground  of  its  being  indifferent  (Adiaphoron).  The  power  of 
the  pope  and  of  the  bishops  was  to  be  acknowledged  so  long  as  they  used  it 
for  the  edification,  and  not  for  the  destruction  of  the  Church,  (e)  This  form 
was  accepted  by  many  of  the  states,  and  was  generally  executed  in  the  midst 
of  strenuous  opposition  on  the  part  of  many  congregations  and  pastors,  and 
at  the  expense  of  the  expulsion  or  imprisonment  of  the  latter.  Both  Inter- 
ims, however,  were  despised  by  both  Catholics  and  Protestants. 

§  842.     Maurice,     1652. 

BofUeder  toL  IL  book  Y.  Camerarfi  Or.  In  memor.  Manr.  {Menken^  Serr.  rer.  Germ.  toL  IL) 
d«  bello  Imperatori  a  Maar.  illatu.  Arg.  1710.  4    Langenn.  (]>.  894.) 


The  German  cities  still  remained  in  the  possession  of  the  foreign  merce- 
naries, the  consciences  of  the  people  were  disturbed  by  the  operation  of  the 
Interim,  or  were  threatened  by  the  action  of  the  general  council,  to  which 
the  Elector  of  Brandenburg  had  already  profossefl  his  submission,  (a)  Ger- 
many appeared  about  to  become  a  mere  province  of  Spain  by  the  accession 
of  the  imperial  prince  Philip,  which  the  emperor  now  demanded,  and  the 
word  which  the  young  elector  had  pledged  for  the  liberation  of  the  land- 


e)  Wtfferur^  Lebensgescb.  d.  Markg.  TobanDes  v.  Br.  Brl.  1827.    His  **  Kleiner  CatcchSsmiia ' 
gIvM  by  SpMtvr^  p.  SSSsa. 

i)'tLf^  Uartmann,  J.  Brentz,  vol  IL  p.  187b8.    ScuUm  toL  V.  p.  61aa. 

«)  BMt^  p.  lOSai.  Mlsfl. 

a)  Aiyiuilcl.  ada.  166L  N.  4U 


398  MODERN  CIXUBCII  UISTOBT.    FEB.  Y.    A.  D.  1517-16I8L 

grave  was  entirely  disregarded.  Maurice  perceived  tiuit  nothing  ooold 
store  liis  honor  in  the  estimation  of  the  German  people  hat  some  hold  and 
deci^ve  step.  lie  therefore  resolved  that  he  would  achieve  tiie  freedom  of 
the  empire  and  of  the  Church  by  one  bold  stroke.  A  secret  treaty  was 
formed  by  him  with  Mecklenburg,  the  Margrave  Albert  of  Brandenburg,  and 
the  sons  of  the  landgrave,  and  an  alliance  was  formed,  in  opposition  to 
the  advice  of  Melancthon,  with  France,  by  which  he  lost  the  possession  of 
Mentz,  Toul,  and  Verdun,  (h)  An  occasion  was  afforded  for  the  collection 
of  an  army  by  the  pretence  of  executing  the  decree  of  outlawry  which  had 
been  issued  against  Magdeburg,  then  the  home  of  Protestant  opposition. 
The  suspicions  of  the  emperor  were  allayed  with  consummate  skilL  On  the 
20th  of  March,  1552,  he  left  Thuringia,  overthrew  one  after  another  the  gar- 
risons of  the  emperor  in  the  several  cities,  and  on  the  22d  of  May  presented 
himself  before  Innspmck.  The  emperor,  though  at  that  time  enfeebled  bj 
sickness,  was  obliged  to  escape  by  night,  and  the  council  fled  with  precipita- 
tion before  him.  By  the  courage  exhibited  in  this  martial  expedition,  it  was 
shown  that  the  existing  religious  innovations  could  never  be  put  down  by 
force.  In  July  (16.  29),  the  treaty  of  Pamau  was  formed  under  the  gnann- 
ty  of  the  empire,  (r)  by  the  terms  of  which  the  landgrave  was  set  at  fib- 
erty,  the  imperial  council  was  to  be  open  to  those  who  professed  the  new 
creed,  and  a  diet  was  promised  in  a  short  time  for  the  removal  of  the  griev- 
ances with  respect  to  violations  of  the  laws  of  the  empire,  and  for  the  setti^- 
ment  of  religious  differences.  Only  one  clause  in  these  articles,  providing  for 
a  permanent  peace  at  least  for  all  those  who  sympathized  with  the  Augsburg 
Confession,  or  at  all  events  for  all  who  were  not  connected  with  sects  con- 
demned by  the  recess  of  the  imperial  diet,  was  seriously  resisted  by  the  em- 
peror. The  two  illustrious  martyrs  were  received  by  their  people  with  great 
Joy  and  many  tears.  Maurice  now  turned  his  attention  to  an  expedition 
against  the  Turks. 

§  848.     ReligiouM  Peace.    Sept.  25,  1556. 

L  L^mann^  Acta  pabl.  dc  pace  rel.  d.  t.  Belcbshandl.  a.  rrotocoUe  d.  RF.  Frk£  (1$S1.  4)  17QT. 
Sappl.  1709.  f. 

II.  O.  LUtel,  Oesch.  d.  RF.  Frkt  1755.  As  to  the  spirit  of  the  RF.  (ffenke't  Mag.  toL  IU  pi. 
6M68.)  JtafiJb^  vol.  y.  p.  276t& 

Maurice,  while  young  and  victorious,  fell  in  battle  (July  11th,  1553)  for 
the  peace  of  Germany.  After  numerous  hindrances,  the  promised  diet  assem- 
bled at  A  ugshurg.  Both  parties  were  now  convinced  by  bitter  experienoe 
that  no  peace  could  be  maintained  in  the  empire  without  mutual  forbearance. 
The  imperial  council  was  composed  of  an  equal  number  of  members  belong* 
ing  to  the  old  and  to  the  new  faith,  all  of  whom  were  to  take  their  oath  only 
upon  the  law  of  the  empire  and  the  word  of  God.  The  right  to  reform  the 
Church  was  conceded  to  the  imperial  states,  in  spite  of  the  continual  protests 
of  the  papal  court  in  opposition  to  it,  and  it  was  agreed  that  they  should 
never  be  oppressed,  molested,  or  contemned  on  account  of  the  foith,  eccleii- 

l)  BbrOtder  toL  IL  p.  lOOSaa.        c)  HortUdtr  yoL  IL  pc  IOSTml 


CDAP.  L    BEFORMATION.    $  M4  CONOOBDIUM  OF  WITTENBERG.  399 

astical  usages,  or  regalations  which  the j  had  established,  or  miglit  afterwarde 
establish.  It  was  conceded  that  the  states  of  the  empire  had  a  right  to 
reform  the  Churchy  although  Rome  never  ceased  to  protest  against  it.  The 
only  condition  conceded  to  subjects  was,  that  when  they  were  oppressed  on 
aooonnt  of  religion,  they  had  the  right  without  obstruction  to  leave  the 
oonntry.  (a)  With  respect  to  individual  countries  to  which  the  Catholic 
party  were  unwilling  to  concede  religious  liberty,  the  King  of  the  Romans 
promised  to  see  that  none  of  those  states  which  had  already  professed  adhe- 
rence to  the  Augsburg  Ck)nfes8ion  should  suffer  oppression  on  account  of  it. 
Bat  while  it  was  acknowledged  that  the  actual  possession  of  any  church  or 
of  any  ecclesiastical  property,  whether  by  spiritual  or  lay  persons  at  the  pre- 
ose  time  of  the  treaty  of  Passau  was  valid,  the  Oatholics  demanded  that  all 
qHritnal  states  of  the  empire  which  should  subsequently  go  over  to  the  Augs- 
burg Confession  should  by  that  very  act  forfeit  all  their  offices  and  posses- 
dons.  All  parties  perceived  that  the  very  existence  of  the  Catholic  Church 
in  Germany  depended  upon  this.  This  article,  which  was  called  the  Ecelesir 
atUeal  Beserration^  because  the  states  could  come  to  no  agreement  respecting 
it^  was  proclaimed  by  the  Roman  king  as  an  actual  ordinance  of  the  diet,  (h) 
ind  became  the  germ  of  future  sanguinary  contests.  The  peace  was  regarded 
IS  applicable  only  to  those  who  adhered  to  the  Confession  of  Augsburg  and 
to  the  votaries  of  the  old  religion,  but  it  was  looked  upon  as  absolute  until 
the  several  parties  in  religion  finally  came  to  an  understanding.  The  empe- 
ror Charles  took  no  further  part  in  these  negotiations,  and  was  already  pre- 
piring  to  lay  aside  his  crown  and  to  withdraw  from  the  world. 

lY.  Establishment  of  the  Refobmed  CnuBon  until  1564. 

§  844.     The  Coneordium  of  Wittenberg,     Cont,  from  §  886. 

The  doctrine  which  had  been  especially  established  at  Strosburg,  affirm- 
ing a  true  though  a  spiritual  participation  in  the  body  of  Christ,  appeared  to 
be  consistent  with  all  the  formulae  Luther  had  used,  and  could  be  distin- 
goished  firom  them  only  by  the  assertion  that  such  a  participation  could  be 
ei\joyed  by  none  but  believers.  On  the  basis  of  this  a  plan  was  formed  by 
Booer  and  Capito,  by  which  they  hoped  to  effect  a  union  of  the  Swiss  and 
tbe  Wittenberg  divines.  They  went  personally  to  "Wittenberg,  and  there 
wfifered  their  orthodoxy  to  be  severely  tested.  They  finally  subscribed  a 
Coneordium  composed  by  Melancthon  (May  25,  1586),  the  phraseology  of 
▼bich  was  so  strictly  Lutheran  that  it  could  be  reconciled  with  tbeir  own 
^  only  by  some  peculiar  and  private  explanation,  (a)  which  sometimes  con- 
^Kinded  together  and  sometimes  distinguished  between  the  unworthy  and  the 
Vibelieving.  But  as  Luther  did  not  object  to  these  explanations,  the  Con- 
^diom  was  accepted  by  most  of  the  Swiss,  and  the  different  parties  were 

^  RudolpM,  d«  eroigr.  sabditonim  et  expal&  ErL  1166.  4 

^)  Frick  (pr.  Ba0b€rUno\  d«  reservAto  eca  ez  mente  Pads  rtl.  ^luqae  effectibns  m  htia, 

*)  (hrp.  £rf.  YoL  IlL  p.  75m.    Shrard  toL  XL  p.  882m.    NitM»ch,  Urkondenb.  d.  £v.  Unloii. 
■MMap.«Ofc  • 


400  MODEEN  CHURCH  HISTORY.    P£R.  Y.    A.  D.  lftlM«l& 

regarded  as  united,  (b)  Bot  Lather  was  oonvinoed  that  there  iraa  no  real 
union,  and  as  he  felt  utterly  averse  to  the  whole  Zwinglian  school,  and  Bf» 
pecteil  Melancthon  himself,  (c)  he  once  more  renewed  the  controversy  in  the 
most  violent  manner.  He  was  now  fast  tending  to  the  grave,  and  he  was 
therefore  anxious  that  his  testimony  against  these  fanatics  and  sonl-destroyOTs 
might  be  left  unimpaired,  (tl)  In  this  manner  the  sohbm  between  these  two 
great  parties  of  the  Reformation  was  restored,  (e)  There  is  no  apparent  fonii* 
dation  for  the  common  report,  that  in  his  last  days  he  felt  any  apprehensioDa 
that  he  had  been  too  violent  in  his  opposition  to  the  people  of  Zurich.  (/) 

§  845.     Italian  Switzerland, 

J.  SennebUr,  H.  lit  do  Gcnvvo.  Gen.  17S<L  StdudUn  im  KHlst  Arch.  1884  roL  IL  P.  IL 
Kirehho/ar^  Leben  Wilb.  Fan>la.  Zilr.  1S8U  8  vols.  Ch.  Schmidt,  Etudes  snr  FtreL  Strasb.  18M.  4 
Ch.  Chenetiir^  Farel,  Frument,  Vlret  BefonnateiiTS  relfgfeaz.  Gen.  188&.  JaqMemot^  Yfavt,  RA> 
formateur  de  Lausanne.  Strasb.  1S86.  4.  Ruckat  and  MerU  dTAubignL  [Utot  of  the  R<<f.  Id  Svlls. 
and  France.  New  York.  1547. 12.  (p.  Saa)  /.  ^pon.  Hist  of  the  City  and  State  of  Geoera,  &e  oolL 
fh>ni  MSS.  Ac  Lond.  1687.  £] 

The  reformed  faith  had  been  preached  after  1527  on  the  borders  of  Savoj 
and  France.  The  people  of  Geneva  regarded  the  bishops  appointed  over 
them  by  the  Dukes  of  Savoy  as  the  uniform  and  stanch  enemies  of  their 
municipal  rights.  After  many  severe  disturbances,  however,  the  inflnenoe 
of  Savoy  was  finally  overthrown  by  means  of  an  alliance  with  Berne,  the 
Reformation  was  triumphantly  successful,  and  Geneva  became  a  member  of 
the  Swiss  Confederation  (1585).  After  the  victory  of  the  people  of  Berne 
in  the  Canton  de  Vaud,  the  Reformation  triumphed  there  also,  and  subse- 
quently to  a  religious  conference  at  Lausanne  (Oct.  1586)  was  formally  intro- 
duced. At  the  head  of  this  religious  movement  stood  Farel  (d.  1565),  a 
native  of  Dauphin6.  lie  had  been  educated  in  liberal  studies,  but  to  only  a 
limited  extent,  under  the  instruction  of  Faber,  and  had  taken  part  in  all  the 
controversies  respecting  tlie  Reformation  in  the  surrounding  country.  In 
word  and  in  deed  he  may  be  said  to  have  been  an  Elias,  who,  though  often 
in  danger  of  death,  overthrew  an  ecclesiastical  system  which  he  regarded  aa 
idolatry.  In  comparison  with  his  style  of  speaking,  the  vigorous  eloquence 
of  Yiret  had  the  appearance  of  only  a  mild  persuasion.  The  constitution  of 
Geneva,  however,  still  continued  unsettled,  the  morab  of  the  people  disso- 
lute, the  people  themselves  uncultivated,  and  even  the  higher  degrees  of  edu- 
cation corrupt 

§  846.    John  Calvin.    July  10,  U(^^May  27, 1564. 

I.  Epp.  et  responsa.  Gen.  1578.  f.  Opera.  (Gen.  1S17.  19  rolsw  f )  Amst  1S71.  (16S7.)  f  Tok  £ 
Calcini,  Be»a*^  Ilenr,  IV.  allorumqne  literae  quaedam.  ed.  BrettchnHder^  Jjpa,  IS9&.  VfML  de  Ift 
vie  et  Diurt  d.  J.  Caiv.  par  Theod.  de  Biae,  Gen.  1664  4  1665.  Lat  In  the  Eppi  aad  oftes.  Mftr 
grams:  Bolsec,  Hist  de  la  Tie  de  Calv.  Par.  1677.  and  often.  Gen.  168&  [Beta's  Lifb  of  a 
by  F.  Gihson^  and  notes  by  an  Am.  Ed.  Pbilad.  1S86.  12.] 


b)  De  WeUe  vol  V.  p.  SSss.       e)  Walch  voL  XYIL  p.  26S988L  p.  2627aa. 

d)  Kurzes  B«k.  v.  h.  Sacr.  Witt.  1544.  4  (  Waloh  roL  XX.  p.  lOOliiL) 

e)  Corp.  Ri\f.  vol.  V.  pi  47& 

/)  At  first  in  the  Beeponslo  ad  narrat  Wurtembnrgcnsiam  de  colloq.  Manlbnu.  Hdlb.  19ft 
On  the  oUier  side :  K.  iStrdbel,  die  Legonde  v.  Lath.  UebertxUt  z.  CalTiniam.  (Zaltaeh.  £  Lath.  ThtoL 
0.  K:  1S40.  U.  2.)  ' 


CHAP.  L    BEFORMATION.    {840.  CALVIN.    BEZA.  401 

II.  BrtUchneider,  Blldung  ii.  Getet  C  o.  d.  Gcnfer  K.  (KeC  Aim.  1S21.)  P.  Henry,  Lebcn  C 
Bamb.  1S85-44  8  voI\  \\At'i  \A  Cnlvin,  transl.  fVoin  the  Germ,  of  P.  Henry  by  //  Sitbhing,  Lond. 
1801  9  Tola  &]  J.  A.  Miffnet,  d.  Eiiif.  d.  'Ret  n.  d.  Tcrf  d.  Calvinism  in  Genf.  A.  d.  Fr.  v.  StoU, 
LpL  1848L  [J.  Jfaeteruie^  Life  of  C.  Lond.  1881.  12.  T.  Smj/Vi,  Obss.  on  the  Life  ind  Char,  of  C. 
FUImL  188S.  la    Art  In  Kltto's  Jourual  of  BibL  Lit  vol.  IlL  and  YII.] 

CalTin  (Cftuvin)  was  a  native  of  Noyon  in  Picardy,  and  was  always 
ardently  attached  to  France.    He  was  originally  educated  for  the  Ohnrch, 
and  cTcn  when  a  boy  had  the  charge  of  a  congregation.    At  a  Liter  period 
h6  acquired  some  distinction  as  a  jurist,  and  finally,  under  the  influence  of 
the  Reformation,  became  a  theologian.    In  consequence  of  a  bold  declaration 
in  behalf  of  the  Reformation,  which  he  made  through  the  Rector  of  Paris, 
be  was  obliged  to  become  a  fugitive  (1688),  and  published  at  Basle  his  Insti- 
tQtes  of  the  Christian  Religion,  in  which  his  object  was  to  vindicate  the 
Beformation  fh>m  the  aspersions  cast  upon  it  in  France.    This  work  was 
wen  then  complete  with  respect  to  Christian  doctrine,  but  by  subsequent 
remons  it  became  the  noblest  scientiflc  vindication  of  evangelical  Augustin- 
ism  which  has  ever  been  given  to  the  world,  and  is  ftiU  of  profound  religious 
aeQtiments  in  connection  with  a  bold,  relentless  carrying  out  of  his  principles 
to  tbeir  utmost  logical  consequences,  (a)    From  the  very  fact  of  the  abso- 
hrte  onmipotence  of  God  and  the  absolute  dependence  of  men,  he  inferred 
that  God  had  by  an  eternal  decree  created  some  for  salvation  and  others  only 
equally  guilty  for  destruction.    With  respect  to  the  Lord's  Supper,  he  struck 
out  an  intermediate  scheme,  according  to  which  believers  spiritually  though 
rtaDy  partake  of  the  very  body  of  Christ  which  was  exalted  to  the  right 
band  of  God.    His  representation  of  the  controversy  was  mild,  and  the  posi- 
tion which  he  gave  to  Luther  was  far  superior  to  that  which  he  assigned  to 
Zwingle.  (6)    Having  wandered  for  some  time  without  any  flxed  residence  in 
▼arioM  parts  of  Italy  and  France,  Calvin  was  authoritatively  stopped  by 
Farel  in  the  name  of  God  as  he  was  passing  through  Geneva  (1686).    As  lie 
believed  himself  by  nature  too  much  inclined  to  tenderness  and  timidity,  he 
fortified  his  powerful  mind  by  a  faith  as  severe  against  others  as  himself.    He 
gradoally  became  more  and  more  austere  toward  those  who  opposed  him,  and 
>brank  not  from  making  use  of  even  the  most  formidable  measures  against 
tbem.  (e)    He  was  not  destitute  of  profound  sensibilities,  but  he  was  averse 
to  aD  earthly  ei])]o3rments,  indifferent  to  popular  favor,  and  exercised  a  com- 
plete control  over  the  minds  of  others  by  the  awe  inspired  by  the  simple 
power  of  a  firm  will,  and  after  a  three  years^  banishment  (1588s8.)  by  the 
tttTors  of  an  ecclesiastical  discipline.    His  opponents,  the  Libertines^  were 
Partly  those  who  had  succeeded  the  Fraternity  of  the  Free  Spirit  (Spirituels), 
u^  bad  embraced  all  the  practical  consequences  of  the  doctrine  of  a  sole 
^▼eraal  Spirit,  to  whom  all  things  and  events  were  to  be  ascribed,  (d)  and 
pvdy  of  those  who,  with  various  degrees  of  moral  character,  were  anxious 
toaroidthe  heavy  yoke  of  the  Reformation,  (e)    By  the  theocratic  power 

«)  Immotio  cbr.  religkmis  ad  Beg.  Franc  Baa.  158«.  Argent  1589.  Gen.  1609.  £  and  olt  den.  ed.. 
'^^'^^  Bcr.  18S4B.  2  P.    [Trand.  Into  Engl.  2  vola.  &  Pbilad.  1841.  and  often.] 
^)  I>e  1^  Co«na.  1545.  at  first  in  Fr.  1540.  Comp.  JTenry  toL  L  p.  270a 
c)  Aary  roL  IL  p;  425fl8.  486s«.  489n. 
^  (ioh.  Instroetio  adr.  fonatleam  aectam  Llbcrtinorain  Ml 
•)  Bmrjf  ToL  L  p.  481m. 

26 


402  MODERN  CHURCH  UISTOBT.  TKR.  V.    A.  D.  1517-l<iaL 

which  Calvin  established  over  the  state,  but  which  sometimes  wavered ;  by 
the  public  interest  which  he  awakened  in  ecclesiastical  affairs,  and  by  the 
establishment  of  a  representative  constitution  intimately  connected  with  the 
civil  power,  ho  gave  to  his  ecclesiastical  system  a  strictly  regulated  freedom. 
By  his  published  writings,  by  his  personal  counsels,  by  his  public  services, 
and  by  the  theologians  whom  he  educated,  his  influence  triumphed  over  the 
Zwinglian  school,  extended  itself  far  beyond  the  limits  of  Switzerland,  and 
subjected  even  the  people  of  Zurich  to  its  power.  (/)  Through  his  influence 
Geneva  became  a  republic,  firmly  establislied,  governed  by  an  oligarchy,  per- 
vaded by  an  ecclesiastical  spirit,  and  renowned  in  the  history  of  the  world. 
Thither  resorted  all  who  during  that  age  w^ere  persecuted  for  their  faith,  and 
it  became  the  acknowledged  centre  of  a  Reformed  Church,  (g)  His  work 
was  faithfully  carried  out  by  Theodore  Beza  (1519-1605),  who  had  risen  to 
maturity  in  the  most  brilliant  circumstances  in  France,  and  as  a  promiung 
Humanist  had  like  Abelard  enjoyed  at  one  period  the  highest  pleasures  of 
science  and  of  social  life,  but  had  at  last  found  safety  in  the  Reformed 
Church.  He  there  became  the  faithful  colleague  of  Calvin,  but  he  was  more 
beloved.  With  his  reformatory  views  he  combined  his  former  humanigtio 
culture,  (Jt)  and  finally  attained  an  extensive  literary  and  ecclesiastical  influ- 
ence, which  made  him  the  patriarch  of  the  Reformation  to  the  sucoeeding 
generation.  (J) 


CHAP.  H.— ESTABLISHMENT   OF  A  PROTESTANT   ORTHODOXY. 

I.   LUTHERANISM. 

ScJdHMelburQ^  CaUlogl  Haeretlcor.  Frcf.  1597-9.  18  i.  (7  vols.)  J.  Mutael  Pnell  in  Epit  F. 
Cone  Jen.  1701.  A.  Lbicher,  ($  885.)  fortgca.  ▼.  Kietfling,  (till  1601.)  Schwab.  1770.  4  J,  G.  WakK 
hist  n.  theol  Einl  In  d.  R.  Stn*itlgkeiten.  2  ed.  Jen.  1778.  8  vols.  Pin  nek :  prot  Lehrbeg.  4-4  vok. 
and  Qesch.  d.  prot  Th.  ▼.  d.  ConcordlenC  b.  MItte  d.  1&  Jahrh.  GOtt  1881.  U,  Ueppe,  Ocaeh.  4. 
dcutscben  Protest  1555-81.  Marb.  18528.  (till  1574.)  2  vols. 

§  847.    Antinomian  and  Osiandrian  CoJitrorersies. 

L  Walch  vol  XX.  p.  2014SS.  Corp.  Re/,  vol.  L  p.  915sa.  Ratghergtr^  p.  96n.  FbrtUmanm^ 
nonea  Urkundenb.  vol.  L  p.  291fla.— C  L.  yitz9ch,  de  antinomismo  Agr.  2  Pgg.  Tit  1804.  4  (Dt 
dlsiT.  revelat  Yit.  1881.  Fbc  IL  N.  9&)  A.  Wetcttaer,  de  anUn.  Agr.  Strala.  1829.  A.  K.  J,  KitmcK 
a.  Oosotz  XL  £v.  (DentBcbe  Zeitschr.  1851.  N.  la)  E.  Elicert,  de  antlnomia  Agr.  Tar.  1887.— it 
Kordt*,  Agr.  Schrr.  mdglichsL  vollatindig  verzclchnet  Altona.  1817. 

II.  AcU  Osiandristlca.  Kcinfgsb.  155&  4.  F.  Funceii,  wahrh.  Bericht,  wie  d.  Bpalt  v.  d.  G^ 
rechtigk.  d.  OL  aich  Im  L.  Preasoen  erhoben.  Koen.  1558.  4.  J.  Jfoerlin,  Hist  d.  Oa.  Scbweimeny. 
(Bnischw.  1554.)  i.—IlartJtnoch,  Preasa.  KGescb.  FrkC  1686.  4.  p.  80988.  F.  C,  Baur,  Inq.  in  Ol 
de  JusUC  doctr.  Tab.  1881.  4.  J.  C.  Lehnerdt,  de  Oa.  vita  et  doctr.  Ber.  1885.  /McK.  Cmtt  de  0& 
188598.  4  Pgg.    ir.  WUten^  Oa.  Leben,  Lohre  a.  Scbrr.  Abth.  1.  Strala.  1844  4 


Luther^s  fondamental  doctrine  of  justification  by  faith  alone  was  quite 
mnoh  opposed  to  moral  lerity  as  to  ascetic  self-torture.    It  caused  the  mind  U> 


f)  Conaensus  Ttgarinaa  1549.    Kiemeif^^  CoL  Cont  p.  19188.  c£  XLIaei  Compk  Bmtd49kagmL<m 
d.  Conflicte  d.  ZwingUaniBmos,  Latberth.  u.  Calvinism  In  d.  Bemischen  Landesk.  Bern.  1842L 

Q)  Uenk€,  12  BelL  za  YiUera 

h)  E.  g.  Beta^  Icones,  L  e.  imagines  viroram  doctrlna  rimal  ot  pietate  iUafltr.  Gen.  1850. 4 

0  Fn)u*^  de  vita  et  obita  Th.  B.  Cten.  \W^^ScMouer^  Leben  de8Th.de  Ben  a.  P.  ICartj-v- 
Hdlb.  1809.    •;:  W,  Baum^  Th.  Bexa.  Lps.  1848-5L  2  vols. 


CHAP.  IL    LUTHEBANIBM.    { 847.  AOEICOLA.    08IANDEB.  403 

penetrate  deeper  into  its  own  nature,  and  conveyed  in  itself  the  highest 
moral  earnestness  and  the  most  cheerful  energy  of  a  new  life  in  Christ.    By 
its  very  nature,  however,  it  was  liable  to  be  misunderstood  by  its  friends  as 
well  as  its  enemies.    Agricola  of  Eisleben,  after  1586  a  professor  at  Witten- 
berg, and  after  1540  a  court  preacher  in  Berlin  (d.  1566),  contended,  in 
opposition  to  Melancthon  in  1527,  and  to  Luther  in  1587,  that  in  the  sphere 
of  Christianity  the  law  of  God  had  no  place,  and  hence  that  the  gospel, 
which  killed  as  well  as  quickened,  should  be  the  only  theme  of  preaching,  (a) 
He  had  reference  to  the  Catholic  doctrine  of  justification  by  works,  and  to 
the  Mosaic  law,  which  he  confounded  with  the  moral  law,  while  Luther  had 
reference  to  the  law  expressed  in  the  Decalogue,  and  in  the  conscience  as  a 
perpetual  schoolmaster  to  bring  us  to  Christ.    Agricola  was  probably  influ- 
enced by  an  idle  vanity  as  well  as  by  this  obscurity  of  views,  but  with  all  his 
talents,  his  cheerfulness  and  popularity,  he  humbled  himself  (b)  when  in  an 
independent  position  before  even  the  unjust  reproaches  of  Luther,  who  con- 
tended that  such  an  onset  upon  the  divine  law  was  dangerous  to  all  moral 
aerioDsness.  (r)    In  this  controversy,  however,  was  involved  the  deeper  prin- 
dple,  that  man  still  possessed  suflScient  moral  goodness  to  apprehend  what  is 
best  for  him  out  of  love  to  Christ,  without  the  fear  of  the  law  or  of  hell.    In 
thb  we  may  discover  its  affinity  with  various  disputes  respecting  human  works 
ind  divine  co-operation,  which  have  been  several  times  renewed  since  1556, 
but  always  with  the  same  obscurity  of  views. — To  guard  against  the  danger- 
ous error  that  Christ's  merits  merely  cover  our  sinful  nature,  and  are  im- 
puted to  the  believer  in  an  external  way,  Andreas  Osiander^  the  reformer  of 
Noremburg,  and  a  man  remarkable  for  his  Scriptural  knowledge,  maintained 
that  Christ  becomes  our  righteousness  in  his  divine  nature  and  by  dwelling 
eiKntially  in  the  believer,  and  in  general,  that  if  man  had  never  fallen,  the 
incarnation  would  still  have  taken  place  to  complete  the  divine  image  in 
boman  nature,  (d)    lie  even  succeeded  in  producing  some  kindred  expres- 
lions  of  Luther,  which  had  been  written  in  the  spirit  of  the  old  mysticism,  (e) 
ind  Luther,  who  was  aware  of  his  morbid  sensibility,  declined  any  contro* 
Teny  with  him.  (/)    But  when  he  was  by  the  operation  of  the  Interim 
dii7ea  from  Nurembnrg,  and  was  placed  by  his  friend  Albert,  Duke  of  Bran- 
^bni^  at  the  head  of  ecclesiastical  afiairs  in  Prussia ;  above  all  when  he 
proclaimed  his  doctrine  in  its  boldest  contrast  with  the  theological  sentiments 
of  Lather  and  the  other  reformers,  in  which  justification  was  always  repre- 
mted  as  a  judici:il  sentence  of  God  with  respect  to  the  believer,  (g)  nearly 
*very  Lutheran  divine  denounced  his  position  as  a  relapse  to  the  Catholic 
amalgamation  of  divine  grace  with  human  merit.    In  Prussia,  Osiander  tri- 
^phed  by  driving  his  opponents  into  banishment    After  his  death  (1552), 


')  18  PositioneA.  (Fdrttemann  vol  L  p.  818n.) 

^}  nrtUmaiM  Tol.  L  p.  849. 

^  <  DhpaUtloDes.  158a  40.  (Loth.  0pp.  Jen.  toL  I.  p.  617as.) 

^  BibtrU,  Oft.  Lehre  In  Ihrer  frQhestcn  Oestalt  (Stad.  n.  Krit  1844.  H.  S.) 

«)  EtUebe  sebune  SprQche  v.  d.  Recht£  d.  OL  d.  Ehrw.  Luther,  yerdolmctiebt  t.  OsUnd.  Kfin. 

^1-  i     f)D€  WeUe  vol  IV.  p.  488. 
^  I>bimtt.  IL  uM  de  lege  et  evaog.,  tlten  de  jnstUl  Reg.  10OOL  4     Yon  d.  elnlgen  MliUef  u. 

Mtt  BekeoatnuML  Kdn.  lO&L  4 


404  MODERN  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  Y.    A.  D.  1517-1618 

his  80n-in«law  Funck^  at  the  head  of  a  party,  sought  and  obtained  reconcilii 
tion  with  those  who  belonged  to  Melancthon^s  school.  Bat  as  all  invanoE 
of  the  civil  as  well  as  the  ecclesiastical  constitation  were  impated  to  hit 
who  controlled  the  dnke^s  conscience,  a  political  party  favored  by  the  Polis 
feudal  sovereign,  combined  with  his  theological  enemies  against  him.  Th 
controversy  was  terminated  by  the  execution  of  Funck  (1566),  and  the  ooe 
demnation  of  Osiander^s  doctrines  as  an  essential  heresy.  (A) 

§  848.     Lutherans  and  Philippists,     General  Affairs. 

The  controversy  respecting  the  Lord's  Supper  had  given  to  the  Refomu 
tion  a  tendency  toward  the  letter  of  the  creeds.  Luther  had  foreseen  thfl 
tliis  would  become  a  pernicious  source  of  theological  quarrels,  and  yet  h 
was  among  the  first  to  commence  them.  Melancthon  was  the  personal  fHen 
of  Calvin,  on  whose  breast  he  had  often  reclined  his  weary  head,  (a)  A  oon 
ciliatory  impression  had  also  been  made  upon  Luther's  mind  by  Calvin^s  doc 
trine  of  the  Lord's  Supper,  and  both  of  these  reformers  had  a  high  esteem  fb 
one  another,  (h)  But  in  the  exasperation  which  Luther  felt  in  his  last  dxy 
toward  the  divines  of  Zurich,  all  who  would  not  recognize  the  natural  body  a 
Christ  in  the  sacred  Supper  were  looked  upon  as  belonging  to  the  same  gene 
rol  batch.  In  the  later  editions  of  the  Confession  of  Augsburg,  Melanotho 
unconsciously  made  some  alterations  in  accordance  with  his  own  gradoal  d( 
velopment.  These  were  confined  principally  to  the  tenth  article,  in  wWb 
every  thing  inconsistent  with  the  views  prevalent  in  Upper  Germany  wi 
obliterated.  This  *^  explanatory,  and  in  some  respects  enlarged  Confesrion 
of  1540,  (c)  which  even  Calvin  subscribed  as  the  deputy  from  Strasbonri 
became  henceforth  the  general  banner  of  the  Reformation.  Without  notidn 
any  essential  change,  men  generally  regarded  it  in  the  same  light  as  the  or 
ginal  confession,  until  an  express  ratification  of  it  was  called  for  at  an  asBen 
bly  of  princes  at  Naumhurg  in  1661.  Here  a  declaration  in  favor  of  tii 
unchanged  Confession  of  Augsburg  met  with  opposition  from  the  Duke  o 
Saxony,  and  gave  occasion  to  the  reproach  that  internal  divisions  preYttb 
among  the  Protestants.  A  new  generation  of  princes  therefore  united  tc 
gether  and  put  their  seals  to  the  old  confession,  (d)  Although  the  path  int 
which  Melancthon  was  led  by  Luther  was  more  elevated  than  what  he  wmd 
have  followed  if  he  had  been  left  to  himself,  it  was  in  some  respects  all 
nncongenial  with  his  peculiar  temperament.  But  even  during  Luther^  Is 
years,  when  he  frequently  expected  to  be  sent  from  the  University,  and  sooM 
times  felt  himself  subjected  by  Luther's  stubborn  and  imperious  sphit  to 
rather  dishonorable  servitude,  {e)  he  was  actually  exerting  a  supreme  antlxH 


A)  Historie  r.  Funk  ex  actis  pubL  (Acta  BoroasiciL  Kdn.  1782.  vol  IIL  p.  217.  81L  471aa>— Oovpi 
doctr.  Pratenlcam.  1567. 

a)  ITenry,  Calr.  vol  L  p.  24488.  868.  876. 

If)  C  B.  Petef,  Erzahl  v.  Sacnunentstr.  Brem.  1600.  p.  187fl>.    Wh«t  haa  been  cited  in  Bmr, 
Oalv.  vol  I.  p.  26588.  and  In  JSbrard^  AbendoL  toL  II.  p.  47488.  li  more  to  be  relied  upon. 

o)  Libri  Sfinb.  a.  Conc<»dia.  ed.  IIa9Sf  ed.  8.  p.  IX.  Xllaa. 

d)  O.  P.  Jlomn,  d.  v.  d.  ev.  Stiioden  zn  Naumb.  geb.  Gonventa  Frkt  1701    Ji  H.  (MMtf^ 
FQntentag  xa  N.  \j^  179&    Hepp^  toL  L  p^  864n. 

«)  Corp.  B^,  yoL  Y.  p.  474  476e.  49a— ToL  YL  p.  880. 


CHAP.il    LUTIIEBAinSM.    {848.  PHILIPPISM.    $  849.  BYNEKOISM.         405 

ity  at  Wittenberg.  The  hearts  of  these  excellent  men,  however,  always 
affectionately  returned  to  each  other,  (f)  When  tlie  storm  of  war  had 
passed  away,  the  University  was  re-established  under  tlie  auspices  of  Melanc- 
thon,  and  the  system  of  doctrines  which  he  had  formed,  referring  every 
thing  to  man's  moral  and  religious  wants,  was  generally  adoj)ted.  But  so 
deep  was  the  impression  which  Luther  had  left  upon  the  spirit  of  tlie  age, 
that  many  could  find  salvation  only  in  the  words  and  forms  which  he  had 
sanctioned.  Hence,  when  Melancthon  was  induced  by  his  attachment  to  the 
new  elector,  and  sometimes  by  his  forgetful ness  of  his  relations  to  the  world 
at  large  in  his  extreme  love  of  literary  tranquillity,  to  seek  for  an  easy 
method  of  establishing  peace  with  the  ancient  Church  by  moans  of  the  Int<.*r- 
im,  Flacius  resigned  his  professorship  at  Wittenberg  (1548),  and  in  Mngdc- 
barg  invoked  the  spirit  of  Luther  against  Mehmcthon^s  perfidy  to  the  Church. 
This  proscribed  city  was  then  an  asylum  for  those  divines  who  felt  oppressed 
by  the  weight  of  Melancihon's  authority,  and  who  entertained  apprehensions 
for  the  purity  of  the  Lutheran  faith.  Even  when  the  adiaphoristic  contro- 
versy had  lost  all  practical  importance,  its  agitation  still  lingered  in  the  dis- 
OQSsion  of  the  question  whether  any  but  indifferent  points  were  surrendered 
in  the  Interim,  and  whether  even  indifferent  things  may  be  siurendered  to 
the  enemies  of  the  goepel.  {g)  To  maintain  an  intellectual  contest  with  the 
new  electoral  house  and  with  Wittenberg,  then  susi)ected  of  being  possessed 
by  a  Oalvinistio  devil,  and  to  constitute  a  fortress  for  genuine  Lutheranism  in 
general,  the  University  of  Jena,  with  a  charter  from  the  emperor  and  the  bless- 
ing of  lieaven,  was  founded  (1548-58)  by  the  soas  of  John  Frederic,  who 
in  troablona  times  confided  in  the  future.  Qi)  Filled  with  anxieties  for  the 
barmonj  of  the  Church,  Melancthon  was  finally  delivered  from  this  sophistic 
MMtt/um,  and  from  the  wrath  of  the  theologians  (April  19,  1560). 

§  849.    Synergistic  Controversy, 

Lather  opposed  to  the  requirement  of  merely  external  works  made  by 
the  Boman  Church,  and  to  the  Pelagian  notion  of  the  merit  of  human  acts, 
the  doctrine  that  good  works  were  not  indispensable  to  salvation.  To  pre- 
vent the  abuse  which  might  be  made  of  this  assertion,  Melancthon  asserted 
in  his  revised  Confession  of  1535,  that  good  works  were  truly  necessary,  but 
in  no  respect  meritorious.  Such  an  expression  had  been  disapproved  of  by 
lather,  and  when  it  was  afterwards  incorporated  in  the  Interim,  it  was  capa- 
ble of  an  interpretation  favorable  to  the  necessity  of  good  works  in  the 
^^itholio  sense.    Hence,  in  opposition  at  first  to  Major^  who  used  it  to  sup- 

f)  Luther  In  the  PraeC  to  the  1st  vol  of  the  Witt  0pp.  and  In  his  Ust  Lottera,  Mel.  In  bis  Testa- 
■•I  of  154a  (Corp.  Ref.  vol  11 L  p.  825.)  and  In  his  Faneral  Disc. 

0)  Wieder  d.  achnOden  Tenfel,  d.  1.  wider  des  Interim  dnrch  Garolum  Azariam.  1549.  4.  FUtcil 
^(k  Interim  et  adUphora  edita.  Magdb.  1550.  Comp.  Biek  and  Schmid.  {%  ail.)— On  Lnther'a 
^:  BaUtberger,  Hist  arcana,  given  bj  Arnold  in  his  KOesch.,  and  last  bj  StriibeL,  Ahd.  1774,  a 
"^'It'ation  of  the  genuine  work  of  the  Physician  to  the  Elector  of  Baxonj.  On  the  Phillppi.<^t  ^ide : 
"^ ''^H^r,  Sjnodns  aviam.  (ScriptapubL  Acad.  Witt  vol  III.  Epit  by  C.  K  Schwam,  in  Zeitsch.) 
'«»hteK.1888tN.ia 

^)  Mdaneth.  Brtefw.  IL  d.  OrQndang  d.  Univ.  Jena,  znsammengeat  ▼.  B.  WHuenhom^  Jena. 


406  MODERN  CHUBGH  HISTOBT.    FEB.  Y.    A.  D.  15ir-16«a 

port  the  Interim,  Amsdorf  maintained  that  justification  by  mere  grace  wi 
in  this  way  denied,  and  as  long  as  the  nature  of  good  works,  and  the  kind  o 
connection  which  they  most  necessarily  have  to  salvation,  was  not  definec 
he  succeeded  in  proving  with  Paul  that  good  works  were  pernicious  to  salvi 
tion,  (a)  just  as  he  afterwards  asserts  the  same  thing  of  human  learning.  (2 
This  obscurity  of  thought  and  bitterness  of  feeling  was  only  increased  at 
religions  conference  at  Altenburg  (1568).  {e)  Luther  had  at  one  time  boasta 
much  of  the  absolute  omnipotence  of  God,  and  did  not  shrink  from  absolitt 
predestination  as  the  necessary  inference  f^om  the  Augustinian  doctrine  o 
original  sin.  But  Jfelanethan^  that  he  might  avoid  at  the  same  time  the  tfa 
rors  of  this  doctrine  and  those  of  Pelagianism,  began  to  maintain  in  1586^  i 
more  and  more  decided  terms,  that  in  conversion  the  will  of  man  oonsente 
and  conspu*ed  with  the  grace  of  God.  Luther  had  been  silent  upon  thi 
subject,  for  his  own  heart  was  a  witness  to  him  against  his  system,  and  i 
behalf  of  the  universality  of  divine  mercy.  In  the  Interim,  this  Synergin 
was  incorporated  as  a  concession  to  the  Catholic  Semi-Pelagianism.  A  woci 
having  been  published  at  Leipsio  by  Pfeffinger  in  favor  of  this  synergisti 
doctrine,  Amsdorf  publicly  opposed  \t,{d)  The  professors  at  Wittenbe^ 
were  obliged  to  defend  Pfeffinger^s  party.  On  the  other  hand,  those  at  Jem 
led  on  by  Flacius,  took  up  the  controversy  and  endeavored  to  prove  that  th 
natural  man  could  never  co-operate  with  the  divine  influence  in  the  heart 
but  was  always  in  opposition  to  it.  In  accordance  with  the  sentiments  o 
this  party,  a  confutation  of  all  the  heresies  which  then  survived,  and  espc 
cially  of  Synergism,  was  sent  forth  for  the  acceptance  of  the  evangelioi 
states,  with  the  authority  of  the  ducal  court,  (e)  But  even  at  J&Mk  there  wi 
a  party  favorable  to  this  Synergism,  and  Victorine  StrigeliiMy  its  leader,  wi 
violently  thrown  into  prison.  (/)  By  various  solicitations,  however,  th 
court  was  induced  to  allow  a  disputation  to  be  held  at  Weimar  betweei 
Strigelius  and  Flacius  (1560).  (^)  In  opposition  to  the  inquisitorial  tribvm 
of  Flacius  at  Jena,  a  ducal  consistory  was  established  at  Weimar,  to  whic 
was  committed  the  censorsliip  of  the  press  and  the  exclusive  right  of  exoon 
munication.  When  the  party  of  Flacius  in  the  name  of  Christ  oomplaine 
of  this  subjugation  of  the  Church,  demanded  that  the  liberty  of  the  press  a 
a  divine  right  should  be  restored,  and  in  their  appeals  to  the  people  oppose 
with  increasing  violence  this  papacy  of  the  princes,  (h)  they  were  banished  froE 


a)  Dmb  die  Propoeltlo:  gate  Werke  Bind  z.  Selfgk.  achodlldi,  eine  r«cbto  At.  Prop.  aeS, 
b.  Paaliam  a.  Luthanun  gepredigt  Without  place  1559.  4 

b)  Wie  christlich  a.  trenlicb  HesshuB.  m.  d.  IL  Schrift  n.  mfr  handelt  Magdebu  1S64.  4 

c)  Acta  colloqall  Altenb.  Lps.  1570.  t.—L6ber^  ad  U.  coIL  Altenb.  anlmadrr.  Alt  1776L  4.  M» 
jorlt  Oppi  1569.  8  volfli  t  witb  antoblog.  in  tbe  lot  toL 

d)  Pfiffinger^  Propoa.  de  lib.  arbitria  Lpa.  1556i  AfMdorf,  dffentL  Bek.  d.  ninoii  L.  d.  Kr.  v 
Confutatio  d.  jctzigen  SchwArmer.  Jen.  155S. 

e)  Bolida  ex  yerbo  Del  aamta  cot^utatlo  etoondomnatio  praedp.  corruptelaram,  sectanua  et  eno 
nun.  Jen.  1559.  4  (Corpus  doct  Thoring.) 

/)  jr.  Erdmann  (Pr.  J.  Oerhardo)  de  Strigellanisma  Jen.  1658.  Han.  1675.  4  Mura^  (Pr.  Wei* 
manno)  H,  vitae  et  oontrov.  Strig.  Tab.  1782.  4  J.O.T,  OUo^  de  Strig.  liberioris  mentSa  lo  See 
lath,  yindice.  Jen.  lB4a 

g)  {Sim.  Mu9aeu9)  Disp.  inter  Flac  et  Yict  YInarlae  babita.  Brem.  1568.  4  (Unsch.  Nacb.  1740L  p 
888.)    (Flaciwt)  Erz&hl.  wie  d.  Streit  Yictorini  endlich  gescblicbtet  worden.  Without  pbK^  1561 4 

A)  Beep,  pro  prelorom  libertate.  Jen.  1561.  and  clt\xttt,^Salig  toL  IIL  p.  6aOH.  PEa«dl  toL  1Y 
pc61SMw 


CHAP.  IL    LUTHEBANISM.    { 8Sa  CBYFTO-CALYINISM.  407 

the  oonntry  (Dec.  1561),  and  the  theological  faculty  was  filled  by  the  advice 
of  the  party  at  Wittenberg.  But  when  the  nnfortnnate  Dnke  John  Frederic 
was  overthrown  (1567),  the  opponents  of  the  school  of  Melancthon  were 
once  more  triumphant.  The  friends  of  Flacius  were  recalled,  though  he 
himself  remained  in  exile.  In  the  disputation  which  he  had  held  in  Weimar, 
he  had  been  nrged  to  the  assertion  that  original  sin  was  the  very  essence  of 
man.  Bat  when  he  attempted  to  establish  this  extravagant  assertion,  which 
Mas  at  the  time  but  slightly  considered,  and  as  an  indefinite  expression  of 
foiling  was  by  no  means  unprecedented,  it  was  supposed  to  imply  that  either 
God  was  the  author  of  sin,  or  that  man  was  created  by  the  devil.  Hence 
even  the  former  friends  of  Flacius  became  his  bitter  opponents,  (t)  Avoided 
&«  this  man  seems  to  have  been  by  the  society  of  his  day,  he  was  the  inti- 
mate friend  of  Luther,  and  possessed  the  very  spirit  of  a  Gregory.  He 
opened  the  path  to  every  kind  of  knowledge  then  regarded  as  indispensable 
to  Protestant  science,  but  expended  his  talents  upon  the  smallest  trifles  and 
the  most  useless  controversies,  and  died  at  last  in  extreme  poverty.  (I) 

§  860.     Crypto- Calvinism.     Cent,  from  §  844. 

Ldtehsr  and  others,  before  {  885. — Peucsri  Hist  csrcemm  et  IlbenttioDis  dfv.  ed.  Peui^  Tig. 
llOBb— /VfoM^  Witteberga  »  Calv.  divexata  et  divinitus  liberaU  d.  L  Ver.  vrie  der  sacram.  Teafel  in 
iMhsenlaod  etngedrongen.  Witt  1616.  4—  Walcfi,  Bibl.  Theol.  vol.  II.  p.  SSSaa.  EicJutadii  Nar.  de 
C  Peac  Jen.  1S41.  i.    E.  A.  U.  Urimbvrff,  de  C.  Fenc  Jen.  1841. 

Although  by  continual  conflicts  with  himself,  Melancthon  finally  suc- 
ceeded in  believing  that  the  actual  body  of  Christ  was  present  in  the  Lord^s 
Sopper,  (a)  he  decidedly  refused  all  fellowship  with  Zwingle^s  imaginary 
Christ,  (b)    By  the  suggestion  at  first  of  Bucer  (1584),  he  regarded  it  as  suf- 
fident  to  believe  that  the  whole  Ohrist  was  present,  and  was  imparted  in  the 
Mcred  ordinance,  and  yet  he  did  not  hesitate  to  call  this,  in  the  language 
ordinarily  used  in  the  Roman  Church,  a  communication  of  the  flesh  and 
bbod  of  Christ,  (c)    He  accordingly  maintained  fellowship  with  the  divines 
of  Zurich,  (d)  even  when  Luther  had  once  more  renounced  it ;  and  as  he  was 
convinced  that  neither  Luther's  nor  Calvin^s  doctrine  of  the  sacrament  was 
an  insuperable  bar  to  a  saving  communion  with  Christ,  he  thought  he  might 
oomply  with  the  suggestions  of  his  own  timidity  and  inclination,  and  allow 
both  of  them  to  continue  in  the  Church.    Hence,  when  Westphal  of  Ham- 
burg fhrioosly  assailed  Calvin  with  the  assertion  that  the  real  incarnate  body 
of  Christ  was  present  in  the  bread, — when  he  saw  the  noble  John  of  Lasl^i, 
Who  believed  not  only  in  the  symbol  but  in  the  mystery  of  the  sacrament, 
with  his  foreign  congregation,  driven  from  England,  and  refused  an  asylum  in 
^  parts  of  Protestant  Germany  as  robbers,  poisoners,  and  martyrs  of  the 
^vil, — and  when  Calvin  himself  solemnly  agreed  with  the  Confession  of  Augs- 

f)  literary  blitorj  in  Walch,  BibL  TheoL  toL  II.  p.  5»78& 

it)  G  neUt^in,  cbr.  PrwUgt  CL  d.  Leiche  Hn.  FL  Miirtyrers  J.  Ch.  FrkC  1575.  4.— a  Bi  LSber, 
CW.  /.  Oerhardc)  de  Fladanismo.  Jen.  1653.  i,  J.  R  RiUer,  FL  Leben  u.  Tod.  FrU  n.  Lps. 
iXtfSL)  179&  R  A.  n.  Htimhurg,  de  Fl  Ilijr.  Jen.  1842.  TuMAm^  FL  Illyr.  mit  BeiL  ▼.  H.  Rm- 
^^  BrL  ISR    R  Sehmid,  Fl.  Erba.  Strelt  hist  lit  (Zeitach.  C  hist  Th.  1849.  IL  la.) 

a)  (kMrp.  R^,  ToL  L  p.  1106.        V)  lUd,  p.  1066. 1069L 1070. 1077. 1084. 

c)  /Md  ToL  IIL  p.  514-ToL  IX.  p.  499.       d)  Ibid,  voL  Y.  p.  842a. 


406  MODERN  CHURCH  BISTORT.    PER  Y.    A.  D.  IMT-lMa 

barg  as  it  was  explained  by  its  own  aathor,  (e)  Melanothon  avoided  a  distinct 
declaration  of  his  sentiments  on  this  subject ;  (/)  and  it  was  not  nntil  the  doc- 
trine of  the  omnipresence  of  Christ^s  body  (ubiquity),  which  had  been  hastily 
mentioned  by  Luther,  was  proposed  as  the  only  saving  basis  of  the  Holy  Sup- 
per,  and  made  by  Brentz  the  law  of  the  Church  in  WOrtemberg,  (^)  that  he 
expressed  his  disapprobation  that  such  novel  articles  in  such  provincial  Latin 
should  be  introduced  into  the  symbols  of  faith,  (h)  But  the  theological  school 
which  he  left  behind  him  thought  that  salvation  could  be  obtained  only  in  a 
Oalvinistic  sacrament,  and  was  opposed  to  another  which  looked  upon  Cal- 
vinism as  only  a  bridge  to  Mohammedanism,  and  supposed  that  their  eternal 
salvation  might  be  eaten,  and  that  a  personal  violence  was  inflicted  upon  the 
God-man  when  the  consecrated  bread  or  wine  was  accidentally  injured,  (i) 
Those  belonging  to  the  former  school  were  sufficiently  numerous  in  Eleotoral 
Saxony  to  form  a  powerful  party  in  the  court  under  the  direction  of  Peucer^ 
a  learned  physician  and  a  member  of  the  elector^s  privy  council.  The  effects 
of  this  controversy  in  Lower  Saxony  and  in  the  Rhenish  Palatinate  were  per- 
ceptible not  merely  in  the  theological  schism  which  it  produced  there,  but  in 
all  ecclesiastical  and  political  relations.  The  Elector  Augustus  avowed  his 
faith  in  Luther ^s  sentiments,  even  when  he  knew  not  precisely  what  they 
were.  The  Philippists  therefore  found  it  necessary  to  preserve  the  sem- 
blance of  Lutheran  orthodoxy,  that  they  might  avoid  the  complaints  of  their 
opponents.  Through  their  influence  the  elector  was  induced  to  bestow  legal 
authority  upon  a  collection  of  Melancthon^s  writings,  {k)  and  as  soon  as  he 
had  attained  a  guardian  power  over  Jena,  to  expel  the  zealots  Wigand  and 
Hesshusius  from  their  professorships  and  from  his  territories  (1578).  In  an 
anonymous  pamphlet,  which  appeared  without  the  co-operation  but  with  the 
recommendation  of  the  Philippist  professors,  Melancthon's  doctrine  of  lSb/b 
Lord^s  Supper  was  shown  to  be  the  only  true  one,  the  various  views  of  the 
Lutherans  were  opposed  as  papistic,  and  the  remarkable  prosperity  whidh 
was  visible  in  the  Reformed  churches  in  and  around  Germany  was  pointed 
out  as  an  evidence  of  the  divine  favor  and  agreement  with  them.  (J)  The 
suspicions  of  the  elector  were  awakened  by  the  denunciations  of  the  princes 
on  account  of  this  book,  and  some  intercepted  letters  showed  that  the  oljecfc 
of  the  Philippists  was  to  draw  him  over  to  the  Calvinistic  fiEuth.  The  re- 
ward which  the  divines  received  for  this  proceeding,  was  the  banishment  or 
imprisonment  of  themselves  and  all  who  favored  them  at  oonrt.  Frayera 
were  offered  up  in  all  the  Saxon  churches  for  the  extermination  of  the  Cal- 
vinistic heresy,  and  a  medal  was  struck  in  commemOTation  of  this  triumph 
of  Christ  over  human  reason  and  the  devil. 


0)  Hist  and  Lit  in  Bbrard,  AbendoL  toL  II.  p.  682aiw 

/)  Corp.  Ref.  vol.  VIIL  p.  862.  vol.  IX.  p.  874. 

g)  ConfeKio  et  doctr.  in  Dae  Wirt  de  vera  praemntia  corp  J.  C.  (Acta  pnbL  Eoei  Wtit  ad. 
Pfaffy  Tub.  1720.  4.  p.  834a.)    Brmu  de  porsonali  unione,  duanim  natar.  in  Ob.  IMl.  4 

A)  Corp,  Rff.  vol  IX.  p.  1084.    Opinions  in  Fred.  IIL :  Jodidum  do  0.  Dom.  Heidalbu  IMa 

€)  Comp.  Heppe,  Protest  vol  1 1,  p.  886fli    SpUkar,  Job.  MoscqIos.  (Zdtacfa.  £  Ust  Th.  1S«».  Hi  &) 

k)  Corp.  doctr.  Pbilippicum  s.  Misnicum.  Lps.  1660.  t  and  often. 

t)  Exegesis  pempicaa  et  ferme  Integra  controversiae  do  s.  coena.  WiUiOQt  plaoa  or  year.  (Ed.  by 
tbe  pablisber  Vugelein  at  Leips.  1574.  with  tbe  mariu  of  a  Genevan  printer,  batoompoaed  bj  the  81- 
leaiau  pbysician  Joachim  Curat%Uy  a  pupil  of  Melanothon.)  Oomp.  n«pp%  toL  IL  p^  4UL  dSTss. 


jOHAP.  IL   LUTHEBANI8M.    f  8St  ANDBBAE  FOBM  OF  CONCORD.         409 

§  861.    Efforts  at  Cmeord, 

nbapiniani  Cooc  dtooon.  Tig.  1607.  Gen.  1678. 11    Hutteri^  Cooc  oonoom  Ylt  1614  f.  Lpa. 
MKL  4.    ^fitoti,  Oetofa.  d.  C  F.  Lpa.  1779.  2  voU^ 

Th6  Latherans  were  now  victorious,  but  it  was  no  very  difficult  thing  for 
their  opponents  to  recover  themselves.    In  the  form  of  the  Eucharist  which 
bod  been  forced  upon  the  churches,  the  sentiments  of  Melancthon  were 
repreiented  as  identical  with  those  of  Luther,  {a)  and  the  spirit  of  Melanc- 
thon 0till  reigned  in  the  churches  of  other  countries.    The  shame  which 
manj  felt  on  account  of  these  internal  dissensions,  was  increased  by  the 
reproach  of  the  Catholics.    But  the  only  way  by  which  the  dogmatic  spirit 
of  that  age  could  think  of  attaining  unanimity,  was  by  a  confession  of  faith 
ouistracted  on  the  most  scientific  principles,  and  deciding  by  tlie  highest 
nthority  the  controversies  then  agitating  the  Ohurch,  and  all  others  of  info- 
rior  imp<Hianoe.    Jacob  Andreaej  the  indefatigable  and  pliant  but  tenacious 
cihaQceUor  of  Tubingen,  endeavored  to  obtain  the  honor  of  completing  the 
Beformation  by  composing  such  a  work.    In  the  accomplishment  of  his  pur- 
pose he  turned  his  attention  especially  to  the  princes  of  the  several  coun- 
tries. (&}    He  was,  however,  repelled  by  both  Lutherans  and  Philippists, 
until,  after  the  overthrow  of  the  latter,  the  Elector  Augustus  became  a  leader 
in  the  affair.    After  various  assemblies  of  clergymen,  much  preparation  (c) 
and  many  corrections,  a  number  of  distinguished  divines  were  convened 
from  the  established  churches  of  different  provinces  in  a  monastery  at  Berg, 
hi  the  last  revision,  performed  entirely  by  Andreae,  with  the  assistance  of 
Sebeoker  and  Chemnitz,  who  had  been  educated  under  Philippistic  influ- 
«Doe8,  every  thing  which  looked  like  Philippism  was  stricken  out.  (d)    In 
this  manner,  with  the  utmost  caution  and  fear  of  exaggeration,  the  Form  of 
Ctneord  was  completed  on  the  28th  of  May,  1577.    The  Scriptures  are  recog^ 
Bind  in  it  as  the  only  rule  of  futh,  but  their  entire  agreement  with  Luther 
Mprerappoeed.    Not  only  should  the  gospel  be  preached  as  the  only  means 
of  aalvation,  but  the  law  should  be  proclaimed  as  a  terror  to  evil-doers,  for 
tbe  discovery  of  sin,  and  for  the  discipline  and  instruction  of  believers.    It 
ttxnoedes  that  there  are  indifferent  things  (Adiaphora)  in  religion,  but  it  con- 
tends that  in  times  of  persecution  even  they  may  be  connected  with  unpor- 
tant  consequences.    An  appropriate  distinction  is  drawn  between  justification 
by  fiuth  alone  and  the  subsequent  gradual  sanctification.    Good  works  are 
not  represented  as  indispensable  to  salvation,  but  as  the  necessary  conse- 
iveooes  of  true  faith.    All  co-operation  on  the  part  of  man  in  the  work  of 
iMnQ  improvement  is  denied,  but  the  Augustinian  doctrine  of  original  sin  is 
^  iSorth  after  a  rejection  of  the  offensive  errors  of  flacius,  in  immediate 
^oiukeotion  with  that  of  the  universality  of  divine  grace,  with  no  attempt  to 

«)  Aftielc*  of  Torgmu :  Kan  Bek.  u.  Art  v.  h.  Abendm.  Witt  1574.  4. 

^)  /a  Val.  Andr€(U^  Fama  Andreaoft  reflorescens.  Arg.  1670. 12.  Ls  Bret^  de  J.  A.  vita  et  mis- 
^"■^basproicforaMiidAEoe.  Lath.  Tab.  1799.  A.  J,  C.  0,JokawMtn^Z,  A.  eonoordiat  Th&tiglc 
(?«lt«h.t  hist  Th.  18B8L  H.  8.) 

^  SdnriMaeh-flAehii  Concordia.  (Aeta  et  ser.  Eoe.  W&rt  p.  SSlm)  Maalbr.  Forroel,  Torgiscbea 
^  (ei  bj  SmnJLtr^  HaL  17ea)    J.  B.  BalthoMir,  Hist  d.  Tovg.  B.  Orelftw.  1741^  6tb  pt 

^  CkiftraM  Epp.  Hannor.  1614  p.  417.  Torg:  Booh,  Smd^r^  p.  78aa.— (r.  Quech,  de  Mart. 
^^•"■■Woi  Jen.  1S4& 


410  MODEBN  CHURCH  HI8T0BT.    FEB.  Y.    A.  D.  1MT-164& 

reconcile  their  apparent  inconnstenoy.  Oalvin's  hideous  doctrines  of  the 
Encharist  and  of  Predestination  are  condemned,  and  the  Lutheran  doctrine 
of  the  Lord's  Supper,  involving  the  omnipresence  of  Christ's  hody  by  virtue 
of  a  mutual  communication  of  the  attributes  of  his  two  natures  firom  the 
time  of  his  conception,  was  sustained.  A  general  synod  for  deciding  upon 
the  new  creed  had  been  promised,  but  it  was  now  looked  upon  as  dangerous, 
and  was  finally  avoided.  The  Form  of  Concord  was  adopted  by  the  imperial 
Diet,  and  all  who  held  office  in  the  several  schools  or  churches  under  it  were 
required  to  subscribe  it.  {e)  It  was,  however,  rejected  by  Hesse,  Nassau, 
Anlialt,  (/)  Pomerania,  Holstein,  (ff)  Bremen,  Nuremberg,  Strasbourg,  and 
others,  on  the  ground  that  in  some  respects  it  was  too  rigid,  especially  when 
it  separated  two  much-beloved  heroes,  by  canonizing  the  one  and  making 
the  very  name  of  the  other  offensive,  and  yet  many  pastors  despised  it  be- 
cause they  regarded  it  as  too  lenient  and  too  fluctuating  in  its  meaning.  (A) 
Its  original  object  was  therefore  never  completely  attained,  and  it  became  to 
the  Calvinists  and  the  Catholics  a  convenient  object  of  ridicule,  under  the 
title  of  the  Form  of  Discord.  Even  Julius,  Duke  of  Brunswick,  had  taken 
a  deep  interest  in  this  affair  through  Chemnitz,  whose  administration  was 
characterized  by  so  many  prelatical  tendencies,  and  through  his  own  treasu- 
rer. But  his  secular  and  his  religious  interests  were  not  quite  identical,  and 
he  felt  himself  painfully  wounded  by  some  of  the  friends  of  the  Form  of 
Concord.  He  therefore  withdrew  from  the  support  of  that  Confession,  and 
Beither  in  Helmstadt  nor  in  any  part  of  Brunswick  could  it  stand  by  its  own 
power.  (0  But  besides  this  Form  of  Concord,  other  pieces  were  agreed  upon 
that  they  might  together  constitute  a  general  code  of  ecclesiastical  faith, 
viz. :  The  oecumenical  symbols  of  the  ancient  Church,  the  original  undhanged 
Confession  of  Augsburg  together  with  the  Apology,  the  Articles  of  Smal- 
kald,  and  Luther's  Catechisms.  This  J^k  of  Concord^  with  a  pre&oe,  and 
subscribed  with  the  names  of  as  many  of  the  imperial  states  as  were  of  the 
same  mind,  was  sent  forth  in  the  (German  language  from  Dresden  on  Jane 
25, 1580,  and  evdr  since  in  its  isolation  has  constituted  the  mafyna  eharU  of 
German  Lutheranism. 

§  852.    Reaction  of  Saxon  Oahinism, 

Bescbr.  d.  calv.  Botte,  die  rich  in  Sachsen  elDgeeehllchen.  JeiUL  1591.  StmmL  vamlichL  Nadirr. 
s.  sacba.  Oeflch.  Chemn.  1767flB.  vol  lY.  Y.    Kietlinff,  (before  $  847.) 

The  Philippists  in  Electoral  Saxony  were  neither  annihilated  nor  oonyinoed 
that  they  were  wrong,  and  it  is  therefore  not  surprising  that  they  soon  ob- 
tained another  brief  victory  by  means  of  the  same  arbitrary  princely  power 
which  had  overthrown  them.  Christian  I,  (after  1586)  was  induced  by  his 
brother-in-law,  the  Elector  Palatine,  to  attempt  a  compromise  with  them. 

e)  Comp.  JohantiMtk,  d.  Unterechr.  d.  C  F.  in  Seohaen.  (Zeltach.  £  hlet  Th.  1847.  H.  1.) 
/)  Johannaen,  d.  f^ie  ProtestanUtm.  Im  FxinL  Anbelt  (Zeftscfa.  £  bist  Th.  184C.  H.  %,) 
ff)  J  bid.  Schlesv.  Hoist  Stellnng  t.  0.  F.  im  16.  Jbb.  (Zeltach.  £  bist  Th.  185a  H.  4) 
A)  £.  g.  comp.  J.  Wigg«rA,  KOeech.  Mecklenb.  Parcbim.  184a  p.  170ml 
€)  E.L,T.  Uenks,  d.  Unir.  Helmet  HaL  1888.  p.  19fla.    a  O.  K  LmU,  d.  OL  F.  im  Henost 
Brannechw.  (Zeltach.  £  bist  Th.  184&  U.  S.) 


CHAP.il    LUTU£BANIS\r.    $852.  CBELL.    $  858.  IIESHUSIUS.    KEPLEE.      411 

His  chancellor,  Nicholas  Crcll,  who  then  directed  public  affairs  without  the 
counsel  of  the  nobles,  and  wished  to  be  called  neither  a  Lutheran  nor  a  Cal- 
Tinist,  managed  in  such  a  way  as  gradually  to  effect  a  union  with  the  Re- 
formed Church.  All  controversial  quarrels  in  the  pulpit  were  forbidden,  the 
principal  offices  in  the  parishes  and  in  the  schools  were  filled  with  Philippists, 
exorcism  in  baptism  was  abolished  in  spite  of  the  murmurs  of  the  people,  no 
more  subscriptions  to  the  Book  of  Concord  were  obtained,  and  an  edition  of 
the  Bible  was  commenced  with  comments  in  the  spirit  of  Melancthon.  In 
tlie  midst  of  these  proceedings,  however,  tlie  young  prince  died  (1691),  and 
no  sooner  was  Duke  Frederic  William  I.,  the  guardian  of  his  successor,  es- 
tablished in  the  regency,  than  rigid  Lutheranism  was  again  restored.  Arti' 
ele$  of  Vuiiation^  expressing  the  most  decided  opposition  to  Calvinism  and 
the  doctrine  of  predestination,  were  proclaimed  (1592),  and  all  officers  in 
Church  and  state  were  required  to  adopt  them  under  oath,  {a)  A  spirit  of  re- 
venge indnced  the  nobles  to  offer  their  swords  as  instruments  of  the  rage  of 
the  divines,  and  after  an  imprisonment  of  ten  years,  Crell  was  beheaded  for 
high  treason,  (b) 

§  863.    Spirit  and  Remit  of  the  Doctrinal  Controversy, 

During  these  theological  controversies,  the  idea  became  generally  preva- 
lent that  the  principal  fruit  of  the  Reformation  was  a  clearly  defined  system 
of  doctrines,  for  the  purity  of  which  every  pastor  and  congregation  felt  respon- 
lible  to  God.     Every  other  feeling  and  right  was  obliged  either  to  yield  to 
this,  or  to  identify  itself  with  it.    Undismayed  by  misfortunes,  and  hurling  his 
treatises,  sermons,  and  excommunications  against  his  enemies  at  home  and 
ahtMd,  Tileman  Meshusius  was  seven  times  deposed  from  eminent  stations  in 
the  Charch,  and  exiled  from  his  country.    But  the  literal  sense  for  which  he 
xealously  contended  was  finally  turned  against  himself.    Wigand,  who  had 
been  his  companion  in  controversy  and  excommunication  for  Christ's  Siike, 
and  was  now  like  him,  and  by  his  assistance  a  Prussian  bishop,  denounced 
him  as  a  heretic,  and  overthrew  him  on  account  of  a  subtle  scholastic  formula. 
He,  however,  still  maintained  a  calm  and  dignified  consciousness  that  he  was 
itroggling  in  the  service  of  his  Lord,  and  in  his  last  will  expressed  no  regret, 
Mcept  that  he  had  not  punished  sinners  with  greater  severity,  and  had  not 
contended  against  factious  persons  with  an  intenser  zeal  (d.  1688).  (a)    Kep- 
^(d.  1631),  who,  while  listening  to  the  harmonies  of  the  universe,  investi- 
S>ted  the  laws  of  the  planetary  motions  that  he  might  with  devout  joy  make 
^wn  to  others  the  miracles  of  divine  wisdom,  and  would  rather  starve  than 
■Portatizo  from  the  Confession  of  Augsburg,  was  driven  from  the  Lord's  fold 
tt  sn  nnsound  sheep,  because  he  would  not  subscribe  the  articles  in  which  the 
^nnists  were  condemned,  and  doubted  whether  the  body  of  Christ  was 
^7  omnipresent.    His  mother  also  died  in  fetters  under  the  accusation  of 

a)  libri  Symlk  8  ed.  by  l/aM,  p.  CXXYIIbs.  SGTas. 

^)  Aiim«,  Lelchenpr.  &.  d  castodirteo  a.  enthaupteUD  Dr.  N.  Cr.  Lpa.  1601.  4.  Uis  controv. 
^^t%  la  Walch  vol  II.  p.  \m.—Engelcken,  d.  N.  Cr.  Boat  17^.  4.  IT.  G.  ffatte,  d.  B«deut 
^  Crdriehen  Pruc««e8«  a  archlv.  Beilrr.  (ZeitMb.  t  hist  Tb.  184S.  U.  2.)— Cbr.  Oundermana 
**!«<»%  Klafce  Petn  n.  Bekentdnis.  (eatjrr.  Qedlcht)  1592.  4 

«)  /.  G.  Leuci/std,  Hiat  Hesbnaiana.  Qaedlinb.  171&  4 


412  MODERN  GHUBCH  HISTORY.    PER.  Y.    A.  D.  1517-K4SL 

being  a  witch,  (h)  The  opposition  to  the  Form  of  Concord  gradnallj  diaqn 
peared  when  its  most  decided  opponents  went  over  to  the  Reformed  Ohuroh, 
bat  the  schism  between  the  two  churches  became  permanent,  in  consequence 
of  the  food  which  was  then  so  plentifally  supplied  to  the  religious  passions 
of  the  people.  The  writings  of  Chemnitz  and  Hutter,  composed  in  the  spirit 
of  the  strictest  Luthcranism,  were  then  generally  esteemed,  and  supplied  the 
place  formerly  occupied  by  the  theological  works  of  Melanothon.  (e)  Their 
ascendency  was  also  sustained  by  the  independent  authority  of  the  literature 
of  that  period.  John  Gerhard  (d.  at  Jena,  1687)  attained  the  dignity  of  A 
Protestant  ecclesiastical  Father,  in  consequence  of  a  happy  combination  of 
polemic  learning  and  quiet  devotion.  The  sphere  of  his  literary  and  official 
activity  was  very  extensive,  and  when  almost  every  thing  seemed  to  be  in 
ruins  around  him,  his  talents  wore  devoted  to  the  work  of  preserving  and  an- 
thenticuting  what  he  esteemed  useful  and  true,  (d)  But  the  youthful  energies 
of  Protestantism  were  much  impaired  even  in  the  midst  of  its  victories  by  these 
controversies,  and  Melancthon^s  condemnation  as  a  heretic  was  felt  to  be  adsi^ 
shadow  upon  the  original  principles  and  type  of  the  Reformation. 

n.  Calvinism. 

Ldecher,  {%  886.)  J.  O.  Walck,  hist  il  UmoL  Einl.  In  d  BtrelUg.  tonderUcb  anasM'  d.  lath.  K.  S 
ed.  Jen.  1788m.  6  vols,  lleppe,  (before  {  847.)  [Merle  d^Auhigni^  Spirit  of  the  Bet  Chnrefa,  Mi»> 
cell  Writings.  New  York.  l&4e.  p.  8468&] 

§  864.     German  Reformed  Church, 

After  the  violent  rc^jection  of  Philippism,  a  German  Reformed  Chureh 
sprung  up  in  the  midst  of  the  established  churches  where  it  had  prevailedy 
by  the  side  of  the  Reformed  Church  of  Switzerland.  Although  it  originaUy 
did  not  expressly  adopt  the  doctrine  of  predestination,  and  never  received  the 
peculiar  stamp  of  Calvin^s  character,  it  wore  a  Calvinistic  aspect,  in  conse- 
quence of  its  special  fellowship  with  Calvinistic  churches,  and  its  reception  of 
a  large  number  of  Calvinistic  refugees,  through  whom  its  institutions  became 
based  upon  the  exclusive  authority  of  the  Scriptures,  (a)  In  the  PalaiinaU^ 
where  the  Reformation  received  its  original  character  also  fh>m  the  influenoe 
of  Melancthon,  the  sovereignty  was  exercised  by  Frederic  111^  who  desired 
in  the  Eucharist  to  partake  of  nothing  but  an  entire  Christ,  with  all  his  bene- 
fits. After  the  disorders  excited  by  Heshusius*  efforts  to  establish  Luthersii- 
ism,  he  deposed  every  clergyman  (Aug.  1560)  who  would  not  accommodate 
his  views  to  those  of  Melancthon  (§  850.  nt.  h,\  and  after  the  diet  of  prinoss 
at  Naumburg  he  still  adhered  to  the  amended  Confession  of  Augsburg,  and 


{')  J. «.  Bre(tachu>ert,  Joh.  Keppler'B  Leben  u.  WIrken.  Stuttg.  1881.    Oomp.  Tkdmek, 
Scbrr.  vol.  IL  p.  884flB.    [Life  of  Kepplnr,  in  Lib.  of  Un  Know.  Lond.  188a] 

o)  Uatteraa  redlvtvna,  by  K.  ffaee,  7  ed.  Lpii  1848.  pi  88a. 

d)  MediUtiones  sicrae,  1608. 18.  and  often.  Uebera.  v.  iZ  A.  Schmidt,  Brl  (182T.)  1887.  Lod 
th.  Jen.  1610-22.  9  Tola.  4.  den.  ed.  OoUa,  Tab.  1762a&  SO  vola.  4.  Metbodoa  atodll  th.  Jen.  1617.  ad. 
4  1654.  Schola  pletatia  d.  1.  cbr.  I7nterrlchtung,  waa  Tor  Utaaehen  a.  OottaeeL  bawofen  adtaa.  JaML 
182a  6  ed.  NQmb.  1668.  Oonfeaslo  eath.  Jen.  1688-7.  4  Tola.  4.  FreH  1879.  t  Dlapp.  quibw  dognmi. 
CalTfnianor.  expenduutnr.  Jen.  1683.  i.—F.  J  Fieoher,  Ttta  J.  O.  Lpa.  1728.  HIat  aea.  p.  XVIL  Ift 
TitA  J.  6.  lllttstr.  Lpa.  1727. 

a)  Heppe,  d.  Cbarakter  d.  deutaoh.-BeC  K.  v.  d.  Yarh.  dra.  c  Lnthartli.  n.  Ody.  <8tad.  o. 
185a  IL&) 


CHAP.il    CALYINISll    f  851  PALATINATE.    HESSE.  413 

introdaoed  into  the  churches  the  simplicity  and  chilliness  of  Switzerland 
(1562).  By  his  authority,  Ursinus  and  Olevianus  composed  the  Heidelberg 
Cateehum^  which  was  soon  after  not  only  received  as  the  Creed  of  the  Gor- 
man Reformed  Church,  hut  has  heen  highly  esteemed  in  many  foreign  coun- 
tries. The  devotional  spirit  of  this  Confession  gives  prominence  to  the  doc- 
trine of  divine  Predestination  only  so  fai*  as  it  seemed  needful  to  console  the 
(Hiristian  with  the  cerUunty  of  redemption,  and  to  that  of  the  Eucharist  only 
to  impart  an  assurance  of  communion  with  Christ,  {b)  At  the  religious  con- 
ference held  for  the  reconciliation  or  for  the  conversion  of  parties  at  MauU 
Irunn  (1564),  the  theology  of  Wdrtemherg  was  found  to  he  in  striking  con- 
trast with  that  of  the  Palatinate,  and  the  doctrine  of  the  Eucharist  hascd 
upon  that  of  the  ubiquity  of  Christ^s  body  exhibited  sufficient  power  to  divide 
the  Church,  (e)  Under  Louis  YI.  (1576)  Lutheranism  was  established,  but 
after  his  death  (1688),  the  Calvinistio  tendency  became  predominant.  The 
latter  also  triumphed  in  the  midst  of  violent  popular  commotions  in  Bremen 
(1661-81),  although  the  cathedral  was  finally  opened  (1638)  to  the  Lutherans, 
who  could  not  be  entirely  exterminated  there,  {d)  In  Anhalt^  the  ecclesias- 
tical Establishment  of  the  Palatinate  was  adopted  from  attachment  to  Mdanc- 
thon  (1596).  (e)  Under  a  similar  influence,  Nassau,  protesting  against  the 
monster  ubiquity  in  the  Form  of  Concord,  was  induced  to  adopt  the  Heidel- 
berg Catechism  (1582),  and  in  consequence  of  its  relation  to  the  house  of 
Orange,  it  was  brought  to  accept  of  the  ecclesiastical  system  which  prevailed 
in  the  Netherlands  (1586).  (/)  Mavrice,  the  learned  Landgrave  of  Hesse- 
Casaely  after  many  fruitless  efforts  to  reconcile  the  two  Churches,  compelled 
the  Lutheran  (church  to  adopt  such  improvements  (1605)  as  ultimately  brought 
them  into  the  Calvinistic  communion ;  but  in  Upper  Hesse  Lutheranism  still 
preTailed.  (g)  Notwithstanding  many  disturbances,  the  established  churches 
generally  followed  the  form  of  reformation  adopted  by  their  respective  princes, 
Ibr  no  alternative  was  allowed  their  ministers  but  either  to  preach  the  doc- 
trines embraced  by  the  civil  authorities,  or  to  leave  the  country.  John  Sigis- 
mnnd,  the  Elector  of  Brandenbarg,  once  gave  his  oath  to  his  father  that  he 
would  never  forsake  the  doctrines  of  Luther,  but  on  Christmas  1618,  he  re- 
ceived the  sacrament  of  the  Lord^s  Supper  in  the  court  church  in  Berlin,  ac- 
cording to  the  Calvinistio  ritual.  In  the  confession  of  faith  which  he  made 
(1614),  he  declares  that  in  professing  himself  of  the  Reformed  Evangelical 
Ghnrch,  he  acted  without  regard  to  the  authority  of  human  names,  under 
the  durection  of  the  Holy  Spirit  through  the  Scriptures,  that  his  object  was  to 
away  all  remnants  of  papal  superstition,  (h)  and  that  in  God^s  cause  he 


()  Flnt  Impression  in  Ocnnan  and  Latin,  Heidelb.  1568.    Niemeyer^  Col  Confess,  p.  LYII, 

i.— ^  V.  Alpen,  Oesoh.  u.  Lit  d.  Heid.  Cat  Erl  1800.    AugwU  (411.)  p.  96aB. 
c)  (Ureinns)  ProtoooU  d.  L  Acto  d.  Oeapr.  zn  Bfaolb.  HdlK  VX&.  4    H«ppe^  Gescb.  d.  dt  Prot 
▼«L  IL  p.  7188^ 

€l)  Gerdet^  Hist  motunm  ecc.  in  civ.  Bremensi  temp.  HardenbergiL  Oron.  ^5<li.    Ji  IT.  DurUte, 

d.  tt.  Stadt  Br.  Breui.  1843.  voL  III  p.  8598a. 
«)  Bepetitlo  Anhaltina.  1579.     Niemeyer^  CoL  p^  61288.    Beckmann^  Hist  d.  F&zBt  Anhalt 

171088.  vol.  YL  p.  12188. 
/)  J.  B.  Steubing^  K.  n.  Re£  Geech.  d.  Oranien-NaiML  Lande,  Hadam.  ISOl 
g)  U^ppe^  d.  £infi]ihr.  d.  Yerbesseningspankte  in  Heasen.  1604-10.  Cass.  1848. 
A)  JfUm^€r  PL  LXXYII,  6428s. 


414  MODERN  CIIUBCH  HISTORY.    PER.  Y.    A.  D.  151MU8L 

was  Dot  bound  by  his  previous  covenant.  Although  he  sought  to  indnoo 
others  to  follow  him,  divested  the  University  of  Frankfort  of  its  Lutheran 
character,  and  abolished  the  legal  authority  of  the  Form  of  Concord,  he  only 
demanded  Christian  toleration  from  his  own  country ;  and  yet  so  great  was 
the  dissatisfaction  of  the  Lutheran  people  of  the  Marquisate  and  of  Prussia, 
that  however  beneficial  such  a  change  of  faith  may  have  been  to  his  foreign 
relations,  it  could  not  on  the  whole  have  been  recommended  on  the  score  of 
mere  expediency.  (/)  The  feelings  of  those  connected  with  the  Reformed 
party  were  much  more  decided,  and  those  Lutherans  who  went  over  to  it 
never  looked  upon  themselves  as  apostate  inasmuch  as  they  still  firmly  ad- 
hered to  the  Confession  of  Augsburg  (of  1540).  In  the  Religions  Peace  no 
mention  had  been  made  of  the  Reformed  Church,  but  its  members  claimed 
the  privileges  of  those  professing  a  faith  kindred  with  that  of  the  Augsburg 
Confession.  Accordingly,  in  the  negotiations  on  this  subject  at  the  Diet  of 
Augsburg  (1576),  and  under  the  influence  of  the  evangelical  spirit  of  JVed- 
eric  IIL,  the  Lutherans  did  not  venture  in  the  presence  of  the  Catholic  impe- 
rial party  to  repel  these  powerful  allies,  (k) 

§  865.     The  Netherlands. 

O,  Brandt,  Illst  dcr.  Reformatio  de  Nederlanden.  Amst  (166S8S.)  1677.  4  vols.  4  EngL  Lnad. 
1720.  4  Tolsi  French,  Abstract  Amst  1780.  8  vols.  18.  D.  Oerde»,  11.  Ret  vol  IIL  Tpep  m  />ir> 
mout  GeschlcdenisacD  der  Nederlandsche  henrormde  Kerk.  Breda.  1819-27. 4  vols. — Corpeqwxndamn 
do  Philippe  II.  sar  lea  affaires  des  Paysbaa,  publl^e  par  Gachard^  Par.  1848-51.  2  voIsl  [SehUUr^ 
RovoU  of  the  Netherlands.  New  York.  1847.  12.  7!  C.  G'^ttian,  Ulst  of  the  Netbeii  Philad. 
1S81. 12.] 

The  Netherlands  were  inhabited  by  an  industrious  and  thriving  people, 
especially  jealous  of  their  municipal  and  provincial  rights,  and  according  to 
the  most  ancient  laws  were  regarded  as  a  fief  of  the  empire.  But  in  conse- 
quence of  a  connection  by  marriage  between  the  house  of  Hapsbnrg  and  the 
royal  family  of  Spain,  it  became  subject  to  the  Spanish  crown.  Such  a 
people  were  sure  to  welcome  the  principles  of  the  Reformation,  and  the  way 
had  long  been  prepared  for  their  promulgation.  The  first  step  was  taken  by 
the  genera]  diffusion  of  Luther^s  writings,  but  as  the  people  were  more  c(m- 
nected  with  Switzerland  and  France,  the  Reformed  faith  made  the  greatest 
progress  among  them.  Here  in  his  patrimonial  dominions,  Charles  V, 
evinced  the  strength  of  his  attachment  to  the  Church,  by  a  complete  enforce- 
ment of  the  edict  of  Worms.  Hundreds  died  in  prison  or  on  the  scaffold. 
When  the  emperor  had  become  fatigued  with  the  cares  of  sovereignty  and 
of  life,  his  son  Philip  11,^  to  whom  he  surrendered  the  Netherlands,  and  to 
whom  all  civil  and  religious  liberty  was  equally  odious,  sent  thither  the  in- 
quisition for  the  extirpation  of  both.  The  heroes  of  the  nation  fell  beneath 
the  axe  of  the  executioner  or  the  knife  of  the  assassin.  After  enduring  in- 
credible hardships,  the  people,  with  their  swords  in  their  hands,  ventured  to 
demand  their  rights.    The  struggle  for  their  faith  was  in  some  respects  diflfinv 

0  />•  l^'  Iftring^  hist  Nachr.  t.  d.  Anfkng.  d.  er.  re£  K.  in  Brandeobi  v.  Prooiaen.  HaL  1771 
A.  Jf&ller,  ($  887.  nt  c.)  p.  SSOsa.  JP.  1/elvHnff,  Oeacb.  d.  Prenss.  Btaata.  Lemgo.  18Mw  toL  I.  ^ 
10U7sa. 

t)  Struve,  pflk.  KHIft  Cap.  &  p.  189i. 


CHAP.  IL    OALYINISM.    S85«.DORT.    ARMINIIJB.    0B0TIU8.  415 

ent  from  the  civil  war  in  which  they  contended  for  their  ancient  rights,  but 
both  were  carried  on  under  the  skilfhl  direction  of  the  heroic  prince  of 
Orange.  The  ornaments  fonnd  in  the  ancient  churches  were  entirely  de- 
stroyed. The  seven  northern  provinces  in  which  German  manners  and  an 
evangelical  fidth  prevailed,  formed  (1579)  a  confederation  called  the  Union 
of  Utrecht,  The  civil  and  religious  freedom  of  these  provinces  was  not, 
however,  adniowledged  by  Spain  until  it  became  so  completely  exhausted 
that  it  was  obliged  to  conclude  an  armistice  (1609). 

§  866.  Synod  of  DorU    ^ov,  18,  IQlS-end  of  May,  1619. 

AeU  Synodl  nattonaUs  Dordrecht!  hab.  Lngd.  B.  1680.  £  Han.  1620.  4.  Acta  et  scr.  synodalla  Be- 
iDoiMtmitlain.  Harder.  1020.  4.  EaU»U  Hist  Cone.  Dordracenl,  ed.  Mothem,  Hmb.  1724.  Epp. 
piMiCaBt  ct  erud.  ▼Iruram  eec  et  theol.  Amat  (1660. 1694.)  1704.  t  LItterae  delegatomm  Haaslacor 
•d  LaadgrAv.  miaaae.  ed.  ab  H.  Heppe^  (Zeitacb.  11  hist  Th.  1858.  H.  %)—J.  Regenboog,  Hist  d.  Be- 
monstranteD.  Ainat  1774.  8  voI&  a.  d.  HoU.  (v.  Cramer.)  Lemga  1781.  2  vols.  if.  Oraf^  Beitrr.  i. 
Oifeh.  d.  Sjm.  ▼.  Dord.  Bas.  1825.  [Artt  of  the  8yn.  of  D.  with  the  Hist  &c  by  the  Stat«s-Qen. 
ftom  the  Lat  by  7!  Soott,  Utlca.  1881. 12.    N.  Chatdain,  Hist  d.  Syn.  d.  Dordrecht  Par.  1811.  &] 

In  the  University  of  Leyden,  established  under  the  influence  of  the  Re- 
formation, the  spirit  of  Zwingle  came  into  open  conflict  with  the  victorious 
spirit  of  Calvin.    Arminitu  (d.  1609)  having  become  perplexed  with  respect 
to  the  doctrine  of  unconditional  predestination,  Gomarus  defended  it  against 
him.  (a)    Both  became  leaders  of  opposite  parties,  and  when  Arminius  at- 
tempted to  establish  an  ecclesiastical  peace  among  those  congregations  which 
had  abandoned  the  papacy  on  the  basis  of  a  few  simple  articles  selected  from 
the  Scriptures,  and  regarded  as  essential  to  salvation,  the  effect  was  to  threat- 
en the  young  Church  and  republic  of  the  Netherlands  with  an  open  division. 
A,  Justifioation  of  their  creed,  called  the  Remonstrance,  was  presented  (1610) 
l>y  the  party  of  Arminius  to  the  fissembled  states  of  Holland  and  West  Fries- 
land,  (b)    But  as  most  of  the  ministers  had  been  educated  at  Geneva,  Calvin- 
ism had  the  ascendency  among  the  clergy,  and  through  their  influence  among 
^he  common  people,  to  whom  the  merits  of  the  controversy  were  unknown. 
Sat  the  venerable  Oldenbameveld  and  Hugo  Grotius,  who  as  a  humanist 
and  a  statesman  had  paid  some  attention  to  theology,  were  at  that  time 
political  leaders  in  the  republican  party,  and  were  the  protectors  of  the  He- 
fnomtranU,  (c)    This  was  suflScient  to  induce  Maurice,  Prince  of  Orange,  the 
Stidtholder  and  the  General  of  the  Republic,  then  striving  to  attain  the 
supreme  power,  to  form  a  connection  with  the  Calvinists.    A  synod  was 
called  by  the  States-General  for  the  determination  of  the  controversy. 
Although  all  the  Reformed  churches  except  that  of  Anhalt  were  invited  to 
^e  part  in  its  deliberations,  the  number  of  foreign  deputies  actually  present 
^tt  very  small  in  comparison  with  that  of  the  members  from  the  Nether- 
"Oda,   Even  before  the  synod  was  opened,  the  Prince  of  Orange  by  an  act 

•)  AmUnU  Oppw  tiieoL  L.  B.  1629.  4.  and  often.  [Worlu  of  J.  Arm.  ed.  by  J.  NichoU^  Lond.  9 
^  &]  0.  Brandt,  Hist  Yitae  Arminii,  ed.  Moahem,  BmnsT.  172&  [AT.  BangSy  Life  of  Arminina. 
^^  Tort  1844.  18.    Life  and  Works  of  A.  publ  in  Auburn,  1852.  2  vols.  &] 

&)  In  Lat  in  the  Epp.  praest  et  erud.  Yiromm,  ed.  2.  p.  145. 

c)  B.  lud^n,  Hugo  Orotius  nach  Schicks.  il  Schrr.  BrL  1805.  [3f.D€  BuHffny,  Life  of  H.  Oro- 
^  to»ii«L  from  Ft.  Lond.  1754.  %.] 


416  MODESN  GHUBCH  HISTOBT.    P£B.  V.    A.  D.  1517-1848. 

of  exorbitant  power  expelled  all  who  belonged  to  the  republican  party.  The 
members  of  the  synod,  therefore,  consifiting  of  thirty-six  pastors,  twenty 
elders,  and  five  professors,  were  selected  with  some  degree  of  arbitrarineflB^ 
and  it  was  obvious  that  the  fate  of  the  Remonstrants  was  decided  upon  be* 
fore  the  opening  of  the  meeting.  Their  spiritual  leaders,  under  the  condoet 
of  Episcopius,  the  eloquent  and  inflexible  successor  of  Arminius,  (d)  were 
summoned  before  the  synod  merely  as  accused  persons.  They  there  protest- 
ed against  an  unconditional  submission  of  themselves,  but  notwithstanding 
the  milder  views  of  the  foreign  deputies,  they  were  declared  by  a  majority 
of  votes,  and  by  the  authority  of  tlie  word  of  God,  incapable  of  any  eccled- 
astical  or  academic  functions  until  they  should  penitently  return  to  the  fel- 
lowship of  the  Church.  In  most  of  the  provinces  of  the  Union,  those 
preachers  and  teachers  belonging  to  the  Remonstrant  party  who  would  not 
immediately  resign  every  spiritual  office  were  expelled  f^om  the  country. 
But  after  the  death  of  Maurice  (1625),  when  the  Republican  party  again 
obtained  the  ascendency,  the  Arininiana  were  tolerated,  and  their  chnrcbes 
became  numerous  and  flourishing  on  account  of  their  liberal  exegetical  litera- 
ture, (e)  The  Articles  of  the  Synod  of  Dort  were  confirmed  by  the  Statee- 
General,  and  although  they  received  legal  authority  in  no  foreign  coantij 
but  France,  Calvinism  became  henceforth  the  orthodox  doctrine  of  the  Re- 
formed Church.  Calvin's  twofold  doctrine  of  predestination,  based  npoo 
that  of  original  sin,  was  in  some  degree  modified  in  them,  and  all  who  pro- 
perly used  the  means  of  grace  were  told  that  they  need  have  no  doubt  of 
their  final  salvation.  (/)  But  oven  the  tendency  which  proceeded  from 
Zwingle  and  Melancthon  was  fostered,  and  occupied  a  subordinate  position  in 
the  churches.  Its  most  important  original  record,  after  the  Heidelberg  Cate- 
chism, Is  the  creed  left  by  Bullinger,  and  adopted  through  the  influence  of 
the  Elector  Palatine  by  the  Swiss  Confederacy  under  the  name  of  the  Second 
Heltetic  Confemon  (1666).  According  to  it  the  promises  of  God  are  general 
for  all  believers,  {g) 


CHAR  III.— PROGRESS  OF  THE  REFORMATION  THROUGH 

EUROPE. 

§  857.     United  Austrian  States^  until  1609. 

Raupach,  ev.  Oest  Hmb.  1782s8.  8  volfli  4.  Waldau^  Geseh.  d.  Prot  in  Oost  Anop^  178IL  t 
voU-V.  Burii,  Hist  dipL  de  statu  rel.  ev.  In  Hang.  &  L  1710.  t  {P.  Smber)  Ulst.  Eoe.  rc£  to 
Hang,  et  Transoylvftoia,  ed.  Lampe^  Tn^.  1728.  4.  J.  Ribini^  Memor.  Aug.  Con£  in  Unng.  Pwoa. 
17878A.  2  vols.  Die  wiobUg8t«n  Sohicksale  d.  ey.  K.  Auga.  Bek.  in  Ung.  1520-  16aa  L|itL  IML 
[Munyay)  IllsL  eco.  ot.  A.  C  addlctorum  in  Uuog.  Utlb.  1380.  Corpus  Syaodonun  Aug.  OooC  !■ 
Hung.  ed.  J.  SUberinyi^  Pesth.  1848.  O.  Ifansr,  Uist  Eco.  TransylvAoicar.  Fret  et  Lpt.  IMl 
li.—Pontani  a  Braitenberg,  Bok.  pla.  Frcfl  160&  t^BucholtK.  (p.  858.)  Rante,  0.  d.  ZObm 
Ferd.  L  u.  Max.  II.  in  &  Zeitscb.  vol  L  p.  228. 

German  Protestantism  was  extensively  diflfased  at  an  early  period  among 


d)  PKa  LinibcreK  ViU  Episa  Amst  1701.    J.  Konynmbttrg^  Landes  Ep.  lUd.  1791.  4 

e)  Adr.  a  CcMetiburgh,  BibL  Scrr.  Remonstr.  Amst  1728.    O.  S  Franelu,  de  Hist  d<*gntlaai 
Anninianoruin.  KiL  1814.    D.  de  Bray,  Eiaai  sor  rHist  de  i'^ise  AnnlQieoiie;  Straeb.  1S8&  4 

/)  Kiemeyer^  Col  p.  690bs. 

g)  Ed.  0.  P,  FriUtcKe^  Tor.  1839.  in  I^irnneygr  ^  462aa. 


CHAP.  UL    KUROPEAN  UEFOBM.    $857.  AUSTSIA    HUNGARY.  417 

the  higher  classes  in  Austria.  Ferdinand  /.,  during  the  last  years  of  his 
reign,  stood  aloof  from  the  strife  of  parties.  Maximiliiin  II,  (1564-76), 
whom  the  Protestants  regarded  as  a  secret  believer  in  their  principles,  and 
the  Romans  as  an  apostate,  endeavored  to  reconcile  both  sides,  and  to  pro- 
mote a  general  reform  consistently  with  the  laws,  by  giving  to  the  knights 
and  to  tlie  princely  cities  the  privilege  of  forming  an  ecclesiastical  system 
according  to  the  Confession  of  Augsburg.  Hungarian  students  who  studied 
at  Wittenberg  and  returned  to  their  native  country  imbued  with  Lutheran 
sentiments,  Waldenses,  Hussites,  and  Humanists,  were  all  instrumental  in 
carrying  the  principles  of  the  Reformation  in  every  direction.  The  most 
sanguinary  laws  were  insufficient  to  impede  the  progress  of  these  agencies. 
All  laws  were  silent  during  the  storm  which  followed  the  battle  of  Mohnos 
(1526;.  No  greater  severity  against  the  Protestants  was  exercised  by  the 
house  of  Hapsburg  when  its  hold  upon  Hungary  was  so  precarious,  than  was 
indispensable  to  its  own  security;  and  wherever  the  Turks  held  sway,  a  form 
of  worship  in  which  no  images  were  used  might  be  extended  without  ob- 
struction. Ferdinand  I.  conceded  to  a  few  magnates  and  towns  in  his  domin- 
ions the  enjoyment  of  a  free  religious  toleration,  which  was  still  further 
increased  under  Maximilian.  The  Reformed  churches  became  equally  numer- 
oos,  and  soon  began  to  be  disturbed  by  controversies.  The  writings  of  Luther 
were  also  carried  into  Transylvania  by  some  merchants  of  Hermanstadt,  on 
their  return  from  the  fair  at  Leipsio  (1521).  After  enduring  many  persecu- 
tions, all  the  Saxon  churches  declared  themselves  adherents  of  the  Augsburg 
Confession  (1544),  the  Magyars  connected  themselves  with  the  Reformed 
Charch,  and  the  Wallachians  continued  to  worship  according  to  the  Greek 
ritual.  During  the  civil  wars  which  took  place  in  Hungary  for  the  posses- 
sion of  the  throne,  complete  religious  freedom  was  granted  to  Transylvania 
at  the  Diet  of  Clausenhurg  (1556).  In  an  election  of  a  king  of  Bohemia 
(1526),  Ferdinand  was  chosen  instead  of  the  Duke  of  Bavaria,  principally  on 
account  of  the  favor  which  he  showed  to  the  UtraquuU.  In  the  commence- 
ment of  the  Smalkaldic  war  the  Electors  of  Saxony  were  invested  with  the 
power  to  command  the  army  furnished  by  the  Bohemian  states  in  any  way 
which  might  promote  the  conmion  cause.  These,  in  consequence  of  Luther^s 
success,  had  regained  their  former  spirit  and  power,  had  become  reconciled 
with  the  Bohemian  brethren,  and  now  combined  their  Hussite  sentiments 
partly  with  Lutheran  and  partly  with  Reformed  doctrines,  {a)  Rudolph  II, 
(after  157C)  permitted  evangelical  persons  in  all  parts  of  his  dominions  to  be 
oppressed,  freedom  of  opinion  was  confined  to  the  nobility,  and  divine  wor- 
ship (after  1604)  was  entirely  suppressed  by  pubho  violence.  Stephen  Bot- 
skai^  Prince  of  Transylvania,  whose  power  was  considerable  on  account  of 
his  alliance  with  the  Turks,  now  took  up  arms  for  the  establishment  of  po- 
litical and  religious  Uberty.  He  succeeded  in  obtaining  the  Fe^ce  of  Vienna 
(1606),  by  which  Hungary  and  Transylvania  were  allowed  freely  to  receive 
either  the  Augsburg  or  the  Helvetic  Confession,  (h)    In  the  latter  province 


a)  Confenlon  of  1535  Jb  1575  In  Lat  in  Jfiemeyer^  CoL  p.  771.  819sb.     With  many  original 
docnments:  Die  andero  Apologia  der  St&nde  d.  K  B^heimb,  a.  d.  b&bm.  Bpr.  In  die  tentsche  yvt" 
a.  1619.  4 
h)  Padficatio  Ylennen^  in  Emher-Lampe^  p.  825ba. 

Q7 


418  MODERN  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  Y.    A.  D.  1517-1648. 

popery  had  been  entirely  renounced,  and  in  Hungary  a  m^ority  of  the 
people  and  nearly  all  the  nobles  had  done  the  same.  AVhile  the  members  of 
the  house  of  Uapsburg  were  contending  with  one  another,  the  evangelical 
states  of  Austria,  with  arms  in  their  hands,  obtained  from  the  Archduke 
Matthias  the  restoration  of  all  the  privileges  they  had  acquired  under  Maxi- 
milian. The  Bohemians  at  the  same  time  received  from  the  Emperor  Ru- 
dolph an  imperial  charter,  (c)  by  which  they  were  placed  on  the  same  ground 
with  the  Oatholios,  and  the  supreme  power  was  conceded  to  the  states  (1609). 

§  858.    Swed^, 

J.  BacUy  Inventariam  Ecc  Bneo-Oothor.  Llncop.  1648.  4  P.  K  Th^telitu^  Handllngsr.  till 
Svergee  Refivmations-och  Kyrkuhlstoria  under  Oustat  L  Stookh.  lSll-5.  2  vol&  (Conip.  Zeltacb.  C 
blAt.  Tb.  1840.  n.  2.  1847.  H.  2.)—/?.  C.  Romer,  de  Gust.  I.  rerum  sacr.  InsUaratore.  Triy.  ad  Rh. 
1840.  Qei)er^  Oesob.  8chw.  (p.  246.  nt  h.)  18W.  vol.  ll.^Schinmeitr^  Leb.  d.  drel  wriiwod.  Kelt  Lor. 
Anderran,  Olaf  a.  I^r.  Peterson.  Lnb.  17Sd.  4. — A.  ThMner^  8cbw.  n.  a.  Btellang  z.  h.  StuhL  Qotar 
Job.,  81g.  and  Karl  IX.  Angsb.  183S.  f.  2  vols.  [Vertot^  Rev.  in  Sw.  on  account  of  the  chang»in 
Religion,  from  tbe  French  hj  J.  Mitchell  Lond.  1728.  &] 

Sweden  had  been  delivered  from  the  sanguinary  hands  of  the  Danes  by 
Omtatm  Vam  (after  1521).  The  Reformation  was  preached  there  by  the 
brothers  Olnf  and  Latcrcnce  Peterson^  who  had  studied  at  Wittenberg,  and 
were  so  constituted  by  nature  that  the  oue  possessed  those  intellectaal  quail* 
ties  in  which  the  other  was  deficient.  The  bishops,  who  held  in  their  hands 
the  principal  wealth  of  the  country,  were  connected  with  the  Danish  inter- 
est, and  the  new  government,  anxious  to  relieve  the  people  of  their  taxes 
and  to  pay  off  their  Ilanseatic  mercenaries,  longed  to  obtain  possession  of  ths 
property  of  the  Church.  A  public  discussion  was  held  under  the  royal  pro- 
tection at  Upsala  (1526),  and  a  translation  of  the  New  Testament  was  made 
by  the  Chancellor  Anderson,  The  king,  sustained  by  the  nobility  and  peas- 
antry,  humbled  the  bishops  at  the  Diet  of  WeKtcratt  (1527),  and  took  posses- 
sion of  the  property  of  the  Church.  The  Reformation  was  iiitrodaoed 
in  accordance  with  the  advice  of  Luther,  although  the  greater  portion  of  the 
people  for  a  long  time  received  only  its  external  form,  and  scarcely  notioed 
the  change,  and  even  the  king  had  cause  to  deny  that  any  change  had  taken 
place  in  the  national  religion.  Those  bishops  who  acknowledged  the  new 
order  of  things  remained  members  of  the  diet  and  superintendents  of  the 
Church,  but  they  were  made  dependent  upon  the  royal  favor,  and  their  pow- 
ers were  circumscribed  by  the  authority  of  consistories.  A  reconciliation 
with  Catholicism  was  sought  for  under  John  III.  (after  1568),  whose  wii59 
was  a  Polish  princess,  and  belonged  to  the  Catholic  Church ;  but  in  conse- 
quence of  the  refusal  of  the  Romish  court  to  concede  the  demands  of  the 
king,  and  the  opposition  of  the  people  to  the  Catholic  ritual,  the  effort  proved 
unsuccessful,  (a)  Sigmnund^  King  of  Poland  and  (after  1592)  of  Sweden, 
atoned  for  his  attempt  to  oppress  the  evangelical  Church  by  the  loss  of  tbe 
Swedish  crown,  which  was  won  (1599,  1604)  by  his  unde,  Charles  IX«,  the 
champion  of  Protestantism.    At  first  nothing  but  the  word  of  God  contained 

e)  A.  e.  btibm.  Urk.  (kbersL  m.  Anm.  v.  Borott,  Gorl.  1808. 

a)  Die  Jeeulten  ala  Vermlttler  e.  prot  Kirobenagendo.  Brl.  Monatschr.  17M.  latelj  fd.  bf 
BOhr,  Neast  1825. 


CHAP.  IIL    EUROPEAN  BEFORM.    f  859.  DENMARK.  419 

in  the  Holy  Scriptures  was  acknowledged  as  the  creed  of  the  Chnrch.  Bat 
finally  the  clergy,  that  they  might  meet  the  calninnies  of  their  Catholic  op- 
ponents, and  that  the  whole  Swedish  nation  might  have  hnt  one  God,  and 
might  worship  him  as  one  man,  proclaimed  their  adherence  to  the  Angshurg 
Confession  in  1598,  and  to  the  Form  of  Concord  in  1663,  (5)  and  a  law  was 
enacted  which  provided  that  all  who  should  apostatize  to  popery  should  he 
banished  from  the  country. 

§  859.     Denmark  with  Norway  and  Iceland, 

Fontnppidan^  (p.  US.  nt  a.)  roL  II.  p.  T5488.  vol.  III.  Xknter^  Danske  ReC  Ilistorie.  KJobenb. 
Svolii  a.  KO«tch.  r.  Dim.  u.  Nor.  Lpz.  1884  vol.  II L  Stemmer  flra  don  Danske  Eirkes  Ref.  Tld. 
Od«iue.  1886.  4— Jffi^rtc,  de  cauBb  prop«gatae  oeleriter  in  Dan.  re£  Ilafl  181 T.  4. 

The  whole  power  of  the  Danish  state  was  shared  hetween  the  hishopB 
and  the  harons.     Christiern  IL  was  elected  king  in  1518,  and  proved  to  he  a 
tyrant  under  the  tyranny  of  the  mother  of  his  x>aramour.    Under  him  the 
nobility  were  degraded,  the  people  were  exalted,  and  the  Reformation  was 
(kvored  that  he  might  obtain  the  mastery  of  tlie  bishops,  (a)    On  his  expul- 
non  by  the  united  power  of  the  barons  and  prelates,  his  uncle  Frederic  I,  of 
Hobtein  (1528-*88),  who  was  connected  by  marriage  w^ith  the  house  of  Sax- 
ony, and  a  firm  friend  of  tlie  gospel,  was  raised  to  the  throne.    But  in  the 
idpnlatioiis  made  before  his  election,  he  pledged  himself  to  maintain  the 
privileges  and  rights  of  the  bishops,  and  to  punish  those  who  preached 
against  the  Grod  of  heaven  and  the  holy  Father  by  fines  and  bodily  chastise- 
ments.   The  Reformation  continued  still  to  spread  among  the  people  until 
the  king  obtained  a  law  at  the  Diet  of  Odense  (1527),  by  which  Protestants 
uid  Catholics  were  put  in  possession  of  equal  civil  privileges,  the  marriage 
of  priests  was  tolerated,  and  the  election  of  bishops  was  rendered  indepen- 
dent of  Rome.    The  bishops  protested  against  the  succession  of  his  oldest 
ion,  with  whom  Luther  was  known  to  be  on  terms  of  intimacy.     Christiern 
III^  however,  succeeded  in  gaining  over  to  his  party  the  lay  members  of  the 
diet,  when  all  the  bishops  were  suddenly  attacked  on  the  20th  Au^%,  1586, 
lod  their  freedom  was  obtained  only  by  the  renunciation  of  their  dignities. 
Boenncw^  Bishop  of  Rocskild,  alone  would  yield  nothing  to  the  injury  of  his 
Church,  and  died  the  death  of  a  martyr  in  prison  (1544).    At  a  diet  held  at 
Copenhagen  (Oct.,  1586),  from  which  the  clergy  were  entirely  excluded,  the 
political  privileges  of  the  Church  were  completely  destroyed,  and  itij  posses- 
■^Mte  were  shared  by  the  king  and  the  nobles.    Tlie  king  was  crowned  by 
^genhagen^  and  an  ecclesiastical  constitution  was  adopted  by  wliich  a  few 
titular  bishops  were  appointed,  and  the  Church  was  made  entirely  dependent 
•Pon  the  court,  (h)     The  Form  of  Concord  was  cast  into  the  flames  by 
^^trie  IL  (1581),  (r)  but  during  the  I7th  century  it  possessed  great  au- 
™ority  among  the  people.    The  new  Church  was  established  without  oppo- 


^>  'Et.  K.  Zeitnng.  188S.  N.  5«. 

^)    Jhhimann,  Ocach.  v.  Dlinncmark.  vol.  III.  p.  850m. 

^)  Jiohnike^  Krunung  Chr.  a.  a.  Qomahlln  durch  Bag.  Strala.  1885.  Jf^ntetf  Bymbb.  ad  IIL  Ba- 
^•■**«^i  In  Danla  comraorationem.  Hafn.  1S86. 

O  ^.Hab  EliVDlch,  de  F.  C.  num  In  Danla  sit  combtuta?  Wit  1716.  4.  Gegen  a.  Zweifd  die 
urkiasi^Se:  Gcrdm,  H.  Bed  vol  IIL  pra«£ 


420  MODEBN  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  V.    A.  D.  1517-lWS. 

sition  in  Nai^ay^  not,  however,  until  the  Archbishop  of  Drontheim  had  fled 
with  all  the  ecclesiastical  treasures  (1537).  In  Iceland  the  Episcopal  party 
were  destroyed  while  stmggling  with  arms  in  their  hands  (1550). 

§  360,     Polajid^  Litonia^  and  Koorland, 

Adr.  lifff^nvolBcii  (W^ngiernki).  Syst  bl»t  chron.  Ecd.  SlaTonlcarnm.  TTltrnJ.  1652.  4  Janet 
llbertt  Dljtfldeutium  in  regno  Pol.  Ber.  1707.  C  Schlcksalo  d.  poL  DiMld.  Hmb.  176S>*.  8  vols.  C. 
G.  T.  Frifsf,  Ret  Gesch.  v.  Polilen  u.  Lltth.  Br«I.  17S6.  8  vols.  G.  W.  C,  Lochner^  FaU  et  rationes 
fatiiilianan  clir.  in  Pol.  qune  ab  Kcc.  cutli.  alionae  fucrant,  asque  ad  conscn^ns  Sendom.  temp.  (Acta 
Soc  Jablonovianae.  Li>s.  1S;J'2.  Th.  IV.  Fsc  2.)  C.  V.  Kra^inski,  llistor.  Sketch  of  the  Ri!»e,  Pro- 
greflH,  pnd  Decline  of  the  Ref.  In  Poland.  Lond.  1S8>^  2  vols.  8vo.  bearb.  ▼.  Lindan.  Lpz.  1841.— A". 
/..  7W«cA,  kurl.  KHbt  Riga  n.  L.  1767s^  8  vols.  J.  lukametcicM^  Gescb.  d.  Re£  Kirchen  in  Lith. 
Lpz.  184S-00.  i  vola.  8.    [Ac  Account  of  Livonia  and  the  Marian  Ten.  Ord.  Lend.  1701.  &] 

Many  persons  expelled  from  various  countries  on  acconnt  of  their  religion, 
found  an  asylum  in  Poland  under  the  protection  of  particular  nobles. 
Churches  had  theref^e  been  formed  which  were  composed  of  Bohemian 
brethren,  of  the  Reformed,  and  of  Lutherans.  After  some  warm  controver- 
sies these  became  united  at  the  Synod  of  Sendomir  (1570),  under  one  gene- 
ral confession,  whose  indefinite  articles  afforded  room  for  minor  differences 
of  opinion,  (a)  As  the  power  of  the  waiwodes  was  almost  unlimited  in  their 
respective  domains,  the  kings  and  bishops  had  very  little  power  to  inflict 
•persecution.  By  these  inferior  governors  a  religious  peace  was  concluded 
<luring  the  interregnum  (Pax  Dissident hnn^  1573),  which  had  the  force  of  a 
law  of  the  empire  to  secure  equal  privileges  to  Catholics  and  Protestants. 
But  as  early  as  the  time  of  Sigismnnd  III.  (after  1587),  the  Catholic  party 
had  acquired  much  strength  by  means  of  the  inducements  which  the  king 
and  the  Church  could  present  to  the  higher  nobility,  while  many  of  the  Dis- 
sidents had  become  dissatisfied  with  the  general  confession  of  faith,  and  had 
renewed  the  former  controversies  in  the  body  to  w^hich  they  belonged. 
Vladislavs  IV,  sought  in  vain  to  effect  a  general  reconciliation,  or  at  least  a 
mutual  understanding  of  the  contending  parties,  by  means  of  a  religious  dis- 
cussion held  at  Thorn  (1644).  (5) — ^The  Grand  Master  of  Livonia  could  not 
refradn  from  following  the  example  of  Prussia,  although  the  archbishop 
arrayed  himself  in  defence  of  prescriptive  rights  and  the  ancient  faith. 
Riga  decided  in  favor  of  the  Reformation  (1528),  and  conscious  of  its  inde- 
pendence as  an  imperial  city,  it  became  a  member  of  the  League  of  Smal- 
kidd  (1538).  Nearly  all  the  population  had  embraced  the  cause  of  the 
Reformation  when  the  Grand  Master,  Conrad  Kettler^  assumed  the  title  of 
Duke  of  Koorland  and  Semigallia  (1561).  That  portion  of  Livonia,  how- 
ever, which  was  situated  on  the  other  side  of  th^  Dwina,  and  which  be 
could  not  defend  against  the  power  of  Russia,  was  ceded  to  Poland  on  oon- 
<lition  that  it  should  be  permitted  to  profess  the  Augsburg  Confession. 


a)  Conscnsns  Sendomiriensls  Ficf.  ad  Y.  V0i.—Jabkm9ki^  Hist  Cons.  S«ndoin.  B«r.  1781. 4. 

b)  Scripta  &d«ntia  ad  Colloq.  Thoran.  Uelmst  1645.  4.    Acta  Conv.  Thor.  Yumr,  16Mw  4 


CHAP.  IIL    EUBOPEAN  BEFOBIL    $861.  ENGLAND.  421 

« 

Gbeat  Bbitain  and  Ireland. 

WUkitu,  OoDC  Brit  yoL  IIL  Befl  Ecc.  Anglic  Lond.  1C08.  t—G.  Burnet^  H.  of  tho  Eef.  of  the 
Choreh  of  EngL  Lond.  (16798s.  i  voIr.  f )  [New  York.  8  and  4  vols.  8.]  E.  CardtceU,  Docnmentary 
Anoals  of  th«  BeC  Church  of  Eni^L  1M6-1716.  Oxf.  1S89.  2  vol.o.  J.  Strypf^  Ecc.  Memor^ls  under 
Heorj  VIIL,  Edw.  and  Mary.  Lond.  1721.  8  Tola.  f.  and  Annals  of  the  Be£  during  the  reign  of  Q. 
Eliz.  Lond.  (1709sa.)  172&s^  4  vols.  f.  H,  Soames^  II.  of  the  Kef  of  the  Church  of  Kngl.  Lond. 
lS26eak  4  vol*.  J.  v.  GumpacK,  Go«ch.  d.  Trennung  d.  cngl.  K.  v.  Koin.  Darm5t  1S45.  Weher^ 
(J  297.)  vol.  II. :  Dor  construct  Theil  d.  Kef  u.  d.  purit  Sectcnbildung.  1858.  {J.  K.  Worgan^ 
Specalom  EecL  Angllcanae,  or  Kef  in  Engl.  Lond.  1$S0.  Zurich  Lettera,  ed.  by  IT.  Robinson^  Lond. 
18ML  8.  71  ruiUr,  Church  Ilbt  of  G.  B.  Lon<L  1S37.  8  vols.  S.  C  MuitUmd,  Tho  lUf  in  Engl. 
Lond.  1849.  a  ZhtT*  Church  Hist  of  Engl,  ftom  1500-1683.  Lond.  1839.  6  vols.  S.  T.  V.  Short, 
Hist  of  the  Church  of  Engl,  till  1688.  Lond.  1810.  S.]— PrimordU  Kef  Hil>emicae.  {GcriUa,  Mlscell 
Gronlng.  toL  VIL  P.  L)  R.  Mfint,  n.  of  the  Church  of  Irel.  from  the  Kef.  to  the  Kevol.  Lond. 
1889.  As  a  cariosity :  OobbeU,  II.  of  the  Prot  Kef  In  Engl,  and  Irel.  Lond.  1S28.  2  vols.— />.  I/unie: 
Hist  of  Great  Brit  {Stuart.)  Edinh.  Lond.  1754m.  2  vols.  4.  Hist  of  Engl.  {Tudor.)  Lond.  1759.  2 
Toli.  4.  and  oAen.    Lingard,  Hist  of  Engl,  till  16S8.  Lond.  1819. 18  vols.  12. 

§  861.    Estdblishment  of  the  Anglican  Church, 

A  party  favorable  to  the  Reformation  liad  been  prepared  in  England  by 
the  inflnence  of  Wycliffe,  and  it  was  now  revived  by  the  circulation  of  the 
writings  of  Lather.    An  English  translation  of  the  New  Testament  by  Fryth 
and  Tindal  was  printed  at  Antwerp  (1526),  and  went  like  a  Phoenix  from  its 
uihes  across  the  channel.    Bat  Henry  VIIL  defended  tlie  religion  of  St.  Tho- 
mas with  his  pen  and  his  sword.    Subsequently,  however,  his  deadly  love  was 
fixed  apon  Anna  Boleyn,  and  he  entertained  doubts  of  the  lawfulness  of  his 
marriage  with  Catharine  of  Aragon,  his  brother's  widow.     Clement  VIL 
could  not  consent  to  annul  this  marriage  with'  the  aunt  of  the  emperor.    By 
the  advice  of  Cranmer  the  king  obtained  a  decision  of  a  body  of  learned  men, 
who  declared  that  the  marriage  of  a  brother's  widow  was  null  and  void.    He 
then  married  Anna  and  fell  under  the  papal  ban.    A  Parliament,  in  which 
lorility  rather  than  a  love  of  reform  prevailed,  sundered  all  connection  be- 
tween England  and  the  pope,  and  the  king,  who  ruled  in  God's  stead  both 
in  Ohurch  and  state,  probably  according  to  his  lusts,  was  recognized  as  the 
■ole  head  of  the  Charch  (after  1582).    An  immense  property  belonging  to  the 
monasteries  now  fell  into  the  hands  of  the  king,  and  a  still  greater  treasure 
of  art  and  antiquity  was  squandered.     Cranmer^  who  had  been  exalted  to  tho 
vchiepiscopal  see  of  Canterbury  and  secretly  married  to  a  Gorman  lady,  now 
^deavored  to  involve  the  king  in  the  Reformation,  even  contrary  to  the  royal 
^^es.    The  superstition  of  the  times  was  exposed  in  the  most  unsparing 
'^^ner.    Becket's  sepulchre  was  dishonored,  and  the  Holy  Scriptures  were 
^^ributed  among  the  people.    The  venerable  bishop,  John  Fi«her,  died  in 
defenee  of  the  liberties  of  the  Church,  and  the  Chancellor  Thomas  More  was 
''^beaded  pleading  for  such  a  reformation  as  no  royal  or  popular  violence 
^^d  effect,  ancl  clinging  fondly  to  his  ideal  of  a  future  commonwoaltli,  in 
^hich  all  might  have  room  to  labor  equally  for  the  common  weal  in  a  life  of 
*^Ppines8  conformed  to  natural  laws,  (a)    But  the  Catholics  somttinics  ro- 
'^^ded  the  king  of  his  celebrated  defence  of  the  faith,  and  of  the  law  of  1539,  in 

**)  D«  optimo  reipabL  statu  deque  nova  insula  Utopia  1616.— ff.  7^.  jRwdA/ir/,  Thomns  Morns. 
«6j^b.  1829.     fv.  J.  Walter,  Sir  Thoa.  More.  Lond.  1880.    [J.  JUaeintoth,  Life  of  Sir  Thomas  Mor«. 


422  MODEBH  CUUECH  HISTORY.    PEB.  Y.    A.  D.  1A17-1M0L 

which  transnbstantiation,  celibacy,  masses  for  the  dead,  and  aiirici]]ar 
sion  had  been  placed  under  the  protection  of  the  common  hangman.  {H 
followers  of  Lnther  and  of  the  pope  were  frequently  executed  on  th< 
gibbet.^  It  was  not  till  the  time  of  the  regency  daring  the  minority 
ward  VI.  (after  1647),  that  Cranmer  was  able,  by  means  of  the  Parli 
to  enter  thoroughly  upon  the  work  of  reform,  and  by  calling  Bucer  U 
bridge,  to  form  an  alliance  witli  the  German  divines.  Edward,  howoYC 
in  early  youth  (1558),  and  Mary,  the  daughter  of  Catliarine,  inherit 
crown.  She  had  been  educated  in  the  Catholic  Church,  had  cndnred 
youth  many  sacrifices  in  its  behalf,  and  now  became  animated  with  e: 
enthusiasm  to  see  it  victorious.  With  hands  full  of  blood  and  violeii 
now  gave  back  England  to  the  pope,  and  Cranmer  died  at  the  stake  fa 
heroically  than  he  had  lived  (1556).  (c)  In  early  life  Mary  sunk  und 
weight  of  her  own  melancholy  and  the  hatred  of  her  people  (1558). 
beth,  the  daughter  of  Anna,  then  ascended  the  throne.  Her  birt 
according  to  the  decision  of  the  Romish  Church,  illegitimate,  and  bI 
been  educated  in  the  evangelical  faith  of  her  mother,  as  well  as  in  the 
of  misfortune.  During  the  long,  rigid,  and  prosperous  reign  (tiU  1608) 
virgin  queen,  the  Reformation  was  established  in  spite  of  internal  and  e 
enemies,  with  a  good  degree  of  circumspection  and  moderation.  But  e^ 
sometimes  found  occasion  for  the  axe  of  the  executioner  against  Ad| 
man  missionaries  and  assassins.  Many  Catholic  ceremonies  were  still  n 
in  the  book  of  Common  Prayer.  A  confession  of  faith  was  formed 
Edward,  and  afterwards  reduced  to  89  Articles,  which  was  aooepte 
convocation  of  the  clergy  at  London  (15G2),  and  was  made  by  Parliam 
rule  of  faith  for  all  the  clergy  (1571).  In  this  it  is  declared  that  the 
tures  contain  every  tiling  necessary  to  salvation,  that  justification  is  Hi 
faith  alone,  but  that  works  acceptable  to  God  are  the  necessary  fruit 
faith,  that  in  the  Lord's  Supper  there  is  a  communion  of  the  body  of 
which  is  spiritually  received  by  faith,  and  predestination  is  apprehends 
as  it  is  a  source  of  consolation,  (d)  Supreme  power  over  the  Church  is 
in  the  English  crown,  but  it  is  limited  by  statutes.  Bishops  continued 
the  highest  ecclesiastical  officers,  and  the  first  barons  of  the  realm.  Wl 
was  done  by  the  kings  of  England  against  the  papacy  and  in  behalf 
Reformation,  was  enforced  also  as  the  law  for  Ireland.  But  the  Irish 
nately  resisted  every  effort  of  their  tyrannical  oppressors  to  compel  tl 
embrace  the  new  faith.  The  English,  however,  proved  from  the  Old 
ment  that  as  a  conquered  territory  Ireland  belonged  to  them  as  Canaa 
belonged  to  the  Israelites.  The  free  and  common  territory  of  the  ooa 
ated  and  kindred  tribes  was  converted  into  royal  fiefs,  and  when  the  pr 
chie&  were  goaded  on  by  continual  oppressions  to  rise  in  rebellion,  thai 
were  given  to  Englishmen,  until  the  native  inhabitants  were  almost 


b)  in/I-in«,  ToL  HI.  p.  84891 

c)  Sirype,  Tb.  Cr.  Lond.  (1091.)  1711.  t    GUpin,  Th.  Cr.  Lond.  1781  BammL 
beecbrr.  a.  d.  brit  BSogr.  UaL  UMaiL  vol  II.    //.  J.  Todd,  Life  of  Cr.  Load.  1881.    [Ut«  c 
C  IT.  X«5<i<,  dE  Mra,  Lee  St  Yind.  of  Cr.  bj  Todd.} 

d)  Niemeyer,  CoL  p.  601aBi. 


CHAP.  IIL    EU£OP£AN  BEFOSMATION.    $  862.  PURITANS.  423 

pletelj  deetitute  of  property.  The  entire  revenues  and  property  of  the  Church 
were  gradually  taken  ixossession  of  hy  a  forei^  Protestant  hierarchy,  by  the 
ude  of  which  the  Irish  were  obliged  to  sustain  their  own  bishops  and  pastors 
from  their  own  scanty  resources. 

§  862.     Origin  of  the  Puritans  and  Independents. 

{Bradthaio.)  The  English  Parltane.  Lond.  1605.  Lat:  Puiitanlsraiu  ftngl.  FrcC  1610.  2>.  Xeal^  U.  of 
the  ParltaM.  Lond.  (ITSlss.  4  voK)  1798-7. 1822. 5  vols.  [With  notes  by  J.  0.  ChouUi.  New  York.  1844. 
8  rote.  8.]  «/.  B.  Miirtdeit^  Hist  of  the  early  Puritans  (I  ill  1642.)  Lond.  1S50.  [  /f.  //.  StoweU  &  D.  WUmm^ 
IL  of  the  PuriUns  in  Engl  &.  of  the  Pilg.  Fathers.  Lond.  1S26.  12.  R  Brooks,  Lives  of  the  Puritans. 
Lond.  1813.  8  vols.  S.]—RobinMn,  ApoL  pro  exullbns  Anglis,  qui  Brownlstae  appellantar.  Lupd.  1619. 
4  C.  Walker^  II.  of  Lidependency.  Lond.  (1648s8.)  1661.  8  toK  4.  &  Hanhury,  \\\t,t  Memorials, 
relating  to  tho  Independents  or  Congrcgationalists.  Lond  1389.  8  vols.  [Bogue  &,  Bennett^  Hist  of  tho 
DiMentera  Lond.  1808-12.  4  vols.  8.]—  W.  ChUbut,  die  Dissenters.  (Zcitsch.  £  hist  Tb.  1S4&  H.  1.) 

A  party  consisting  principally  of  those  strict  Oalvinists  who  had  suffered 
persecution  under  the  reign  of  Mary,  and  now  had  returned  as  confessors,  took 
ofTence  at  the  dei)endence  of  the  Church  upon  the  state,  at  the  high  preroga- 
tives of  the  bishops,  and  at  the  splendid  ritual  of  worship,  whose  indifferent 
forms  not  being  expressly  authorized  by  Scripture,  were  looked  upon  as  rem- 
nants of  Antichrist.  These  Puritans  demanded  a  Presbyterian  form  of 
Chnroh  government,  a  simple  spiritual  form  of  worship,  and  a  strict  disci- 
pline. Elizabeth  endeavored  to  overcome  their  opposition,  but  this  was  found 
rather  to  increase  with  their  Sabbatical  festivals  on  Sunday,  and  their  Calvin- 
istic  doctrine  of  predestination.  By  the  Act  of  Uniformity  (1559)  all  Non- 
conformists were  threatened  with  fines  and  imprisonment,  and  their  ministers 
with  deposition  and  banishment.  But  those  ministers  who  had  resigned  their 
congregations,  or  been  deposed,  established  new  congregations  in  connection 
with  Presbyteries  (after  1572),  and  the  most  vigorous  portion  of  the  estab- 
lished Church  itself  exhibited  an  inclination  toward  Puritanism.  A  separa- 
tion from  a  church  which  was  regarded  as  a  persecutor  of  Christians  was  now 
effected  on  conscientious  principles  by  Robert  Brown  (after  1580),  and  after 
his  return  by  John  Robinson  (after  1610),  who  preached  that  according  to 
apostolic  example  every  congregation  should  bo  an  independent  church,  that 
every  man  was  justified  in  worshipping  God  according  to  his  own  conscience, 
and  that  ministers  were  dependent  only  on  their  congregations.  These  Inde- 
pendents^ when  they  were  compelled  to  leave  their  own  country  formed  con- 
gregations in  the  Netherhmds  and  in  America,  but  they  were  still  firmly 
rooted  in  England,  where  the  Puritans  under  continual  persecuticins  became 
daily  more  violent  and  gloomy,  and  gradually  a  dangerous  and  powerful  party. 
In  their  morals  and  manners  they  were  eminently  pious,  they  looked  upon  all 
earthly  pleasures  as  sinful,  their  own  fancies  were  regarded  as  divine  inspira- 
tions, and  they  tliought  that  the  state  itself  should  be  subject  to  their  demo- 
cratic hierarchy. 


424  MODERN  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  Y.    A.  D.  1617-1M& 

863.    Scotland, 

J.  Knox,  H.  of  the  Rcf.  of  Scot!,  (till  1567.)  Lond.  1664.  f.  &  often.  D.  CuJdfrttood,  H.  of  Um 
Kirk  of  Sc.  Lond.  1673.  £  Edinb.  1845.  7  vols.  GU.  Stttart,  H.  of  the  Kef  In  9c  Lond.  17S0.  G.  Cboft; 
H.  of  the  Church  of  Sa  tfom  the  Kef.  £<1inb.  1815.  8  vols.  A".  //.  Siieir,  d.  K.  r.  Sch.  Heldlb.  ISiL 
2  Abth.  A'.  G.  V.  Rudloff,  Oesch.  d.  Ref  In  Sch.  Brl.  1S47-9.  2  voU  [J.  Skinner,  Eorl.  Illst.  of  Sc 
Ltmd  1S18.  2  vol*,  a  AnalecU  Scotia,  lllustr.  the  civil,  eocl.  *  lit  11.  of  9c  Ed.  1S3M-7.  2  vols.  8. 
IT.  Jf.  IlttheHngton,  H.  of  the  Charch  of  Sc  till  1843.  4  eil.  Edinb.  1851  a  8  ed.  New  Y(»rk.  1844.  8] 
—RobertJton,  II.  of  Sc  E<llnb.  1759.  2  vols.  4  &,  often.  [New  Yi»rk.  18:J6.  a  P.  F.  TytUr,  II.  of  Sc 
Lond.  1842-44.  9  vols,  a  dc  1845.  7  vols,  a    Sir  W.  Scoti,  \l.  of  Sc  new  ed.  Lond.  1S37  2  vi4s.  12] 

The  first  martyr  for  the  Reformation  in  Scotland  (1528)  was  Patrick 
Hamilton^  a  youth  belonging  to  the  royal  family,  bnt  favorable  to  the  Refor- 
mation in  conseqaenco  of  his  studies  in  Grermany.  Cardinal  Bfatoun  continued 
to  bum  persons  at  the  stake  until  a  martyr  predicted  from  the  midst  of  the 
flames  his  own  violent  death  (1546).     Such  martyrdoms  were  the  most  im- 
pressive kind  of  preaching  for  a  rude  and  sensuous,  but  true-hearted  people. 
Under  the  unsettled  regency  which  bore  sway  during  the  minority  of  Queen 
Mary  Stuart  the  reform  party  had  opportunity  to  gain  strength.    The  leader 
and  the  impetuous  but  eloquent  preacher  of  this  party  was  John  Knox' 
(d.  1572),  whose  vigor  hud  been  acquired  amid  the  flames  of  persecution  and 
the  toils  of  the  galleys,  and  who  had  learned  to  despise  the  terrors  as  well  as 
the  pleasures  of  the  world,  (a)    After  the  marriage  of  Mary  with  the  Dau- 
phin of  France  the  regency  attempted,  with  the  aid  of  French  troops  to  over- 
throw the  Reformation,  and  to  enforce  the  hereditary  claims  of  the  queen 
upon  the  English  crown.    The  Reformed  party  then  collected  together  and 
formed  themselves  into  a  Congregation  of  Christ  at  Edinburgh  (1557),  and 
with  Elizabeth's  assistance  obtained  an  act  of  Parliament  (1560)  by  which  the 
people  received  a  Calvinistic  Reformation,  (h)  and  the  nobles  the  greater  part 
of  the  property  of  the  Church.    But  in  the  season  of  its  triumph  Protestant- 
ism sought  to  persecute  its  enemies  ;  it  sometimes  cost  a  person  his  property, 
and  even  his  life,  to  attend  a  mass,  and  a  pious  vandalism  wreaked  its  tarj 
upon  the  monuments  of  the  Church.    After  the  death  of  her  husband  Mary 
returned  to  her  own  hereditary  dominions  (1561).    The  frivolous  manners  of 
this  beautiful  queen's  court  were  an  abomination  to  the  stern  Calvinists,  and 
Knox  went  to  meet  her  as  the  ancient  prophet  did  the  idolatrous  queen,  and 
remained  unmoved  by  her  tears.    Finally  she  awoke  the  flames  of  civil  war, 
not  so  much  by  her  secret  machinations  against  the  Reformation  as  by  her 
criminal  passions.    Failing  to  accomplish  her  purposes  by  such  means  she 
now  cast  herself  into  the  fatal  arin.<»  of  Elizabeth,  (c)    The  crown  was  placed 
upon  the  head  of  her  son,  James  VL  (1567),  the  leaders  of  the  Reformation 
were  made  regents  during  his  minority,  and  a  Presbyterian  form  of  eoclesiaa- 
tical  government  was  every  where  adopted  (1592). 

a)  Smetoniug,  Vita  Kn.  Edinb.  1579.  4.  Th.  McCrU.  Life  of  J.  Kn.  Etilnbb  ISll.  9  toIs.  A  «tA(& 
[ancinnatl.  (In  Galv.  Lib.  vol.  III.)  IS&S.  a]  Irn  Aqbz.  ▼.  Planck^  Gott  1817.  G.  W0b4r,J.  Kn.  a. 
(L  schoti  K.  (Stud.  a.  Krit  1S42.  U.  4.) 

b)  Cont  Scoticana  I.  in  NietMyer  p.  Lis.  840sa.  4e  First  Book  of  DiBclpline. 

c)  F.  V.  Rnnmer,  Elizabeth  n.  Maria  Staart  Lpfl.  1886.  {IT.  G.  BtU,  Life  of  Marf,  Qaaca  ef 
Scota.  Lond.  1S40.  8  cd.  a  P.  F.  TytUr,  Inquiry  into  tbe  Evidence,  dso.  Lond.  1790.  9  volflL  WkUm- 
ker't  Vind.  Je  MIm  Btng«r't  Life.] 


CUAP.  nL    EUBOPEAN  BEFOBlf.    $  861  JAMES  I.    CHABLE9  L  425 

§  864.  Great  Britain  tinder  the  Stuarta. 

KuAteorth^  Hist  Collections.  1618-44.  Lon>].  1782.  6  vols,  ffarria,  IT.  of  James  I.  I/)nd.  1754  4. 
■ad  n.  of  Charles  L  Lond.  1758.  4.  GuUot,  II.  de  lardvol.  d'Angletorre.  [UUt.  of  the  Eniz.  Rev.  of 
1640,  ttom  the  Fr.  of  Onlzot  Lond.  1845.  &]  Par.  1886  3  ed.  1841.  2  vols.  Sc  Collection  des  MemoiroA 
nlatift  k  la  Bev.  Par.  1828.  8  vols.  Maca^tlttif^  II.  of  Engl  vol.  I.  cap.  1.  [</.  //  .Apaa^  Court  of  Engl 
under  tbe  Staarta.  Lend.  1846.  4  vols.  8.  R,  VaugKan^  \L  of  Engl  under  the  Stuarts  &.  Common- 
wealth.  1608-88.  Lond.  1840.  9  vols.] 

Mary's  son  was  also  Elizabeth's  heir,  James  I.  of  England.    Utterly  disap- 
pointing  the  hopes  he  had  raised  among  the  Presbyterians,  he  appointed  bish- 
ops as  the  instrnments  of  an  arbitrary  monarchy  in  Scotland,  was  increasingly 
bitter  even  to  the  last  toward  the  rude  strictness  of  the  Pnritans,  but  was  mild 
in  his  opposition  to  the  Oatholics,  in  proportion  as  they  swore  that  the  pope 
had  no  power  to  depose  princes,  nor  absolve  subjects  from  their  allegiance. 
The  discovery  of  a  plot  formed  by  some  Oatholics  for  blowing  up  the  Parlia- 
ment (1606?,  filled  the  peoi)le  with  consternation  and  hatred.     Charles  I,  in- 
herited his  father's  inclinations  and  aversions.  The  opposition  of  the  Puritans 
which  had  already  been  increased  by  persecution,  and  been  directed  to  the 
inferior  regard  sliown  in  the  Old  Testament  to  worldly  monarchy,  was  aroused 
to  the  highest  extreme  by  prelatical  sermons  upon  the  superiority  of  a  mon- 
arch to  all  laws,  and  upon  the  duty  of  unconditional  submission  to  his  au- 
thority.   The  king  made  an  effort  to  govern  without  his  Parliament,  married 
a  Catholic  princess,  who  imagined  herself  a  modem  Esther,  and  gave  to  the 
Scottish  Church  a  liturgy  which  the  people  abhorred  as  they  would  have  done 
a  service  to  Baal.    The  Scots  now  formed  a  league  in  behalf  of  the  true  re- 
ligion and  the  freedom  of  the  kingdom  (Covenant,  1688).    The  king  was 
oUiged  to  convene  the  Parliament  (1640)  to  obtain  money  for  the  war  against 
them,  but  the  representatives  of  an  enraged  people,  exasperated  by  still  fur- 
ther thoughtless  opposition,  impeached  the  royal  counsellors,  entered  into  the 
Solemn  Leagne  of  the  Scots,  and  when  threatened  by  the  king  raised  an 
army,  which,  in  spite  of  many  defeats,  soon  became  irresistible  in  consequence 
of  its  religious  enthusiasm  and  moral  discipline.    The  Irish  Catholics,  relying 
npoQ  the  repated  inclinations  of  the  king,  made  preparations  for  a  general  mas- 
MUJre  of  the  Protestants  among  them  (1641).    The  Puritans,  with  their  Old 
Testament  style  of  preaching,  maintained  their  ascendency  in  Parliament, 
^hile  the  Independents  were  most  numerous  in  the  army,  but  both  were 
•peed  in  their  opposition  to  all  papal  abominations,  and  in  their  derivation 
^  all  power  from  God  and  his  people.    A  select  number  of  pious  and  intel- 
ligent clergymen  were  assembled  by  the  Parliament  to  consult  with  a  smaller 
nmnher  from  its  own  body  with  respect  to  a  new  ecclesiastical  organization. 
This  Watminster  Synod  (1 648-49)  in  connection  with  a  few  commissioners 
"^^  the  Scottish  Church,  after  long  debates  between  Presbyterians,  Inde- 
P*^ta,  and  those  who  would  have  the  Church  governed  by  the  civil  pow- 
^  (Erastians),  finally  adopted  a  Puritanic  order  of  worship,  a  Presbyterian 
*Mrm  of  Church  government,  and  a  Calvinistic  Confession  of  Faith  with  two 
^^•^^hisms.    The  seats  of  the  bishops  in  the  House  of  Lords  had  been  va- 
^ted,  and  their  office  was  now  abolished,  the  revenues  of  the  Church  prop- 
^^  Were  consumed  in  these  difficult  times,  principally  for  political  purposes, 
*Ba  with  a  few  alterations  in  favor  of  the  civil  powers  the  acts  of  the  Synod 


426  MODERN  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  Y.    A.  D.  1M7-1648. 

were  proclaimed  as  laws.  Only  in  the  Scottish  Charch,  however,  have  the 
TVestniinster  Standards  been  thoroughly  received,  for  in  England  their  enforce- 
ment was  opposed  by  the  growing  ascendency  of  the  array,  (a)  Archbishop 
Laud,  who  had  refused  all  connection  with  the  pope  as  long  as  Rome  re- 
mained as  it  was,  but  who  had  been  unable  to  recognize  him  as  Antichrist, 
now  ascended  the  scafibld  (1645),  and  was  soon  followed  by  his  sovereign, 
with  a  fortitude  and  divine  resignation  which  has  since  given  him  the  name 
of  a  martyr  king  (Jan.  30,  1649).  Cromwell^  an  Independent,  though  as  a 
ruler  favorable  to  a  Presbyterian  constitution,  in  the  mean  time  obtained  the 
mastery  of  the  revolution  which  had  borne  him  into  power,  and  gradually 
advanced  from  the  fanaticism  of  faith  and  freedom  to  the  cunning  selfishness 
of  a  tyrant,  (b) 

Fejlsce, 

h  (Serrannfl)  Cmmtr.  de  stata  reL  et  reip.  in  r^rno  OaL  Gen.  1570-80.  5  toIs.  {Bc»a)  H.  ece.  das 
^'g1.  Tvf.  1521-63.  Antv.  I5S0.  3  vol.s  Reynier  d«  la  PlancK*^  II.  do  I'^Ut  de  France,  aous  Fran^,  IL 
pobl.  p.  Jfennech^t,  Par.  1S36.  2  voK  DaviUi,  11.  delle  guerro  civ.  di  Franda.  1559 -9S.  Ven.  l(aw.4. 
&  often.  (BenoM)  II.  de  Tddit.  de  Nantes.  Delft.  1698a.  5  voK  4.  De  Thou  (|>.  853).— Recuell  de 
Lettree  niltoives  de  Henri  IV.,  pnblle  par  Berger  de  Xivrey,  vol.  I.  (1568-S4.)  Par.  1*48.  {G.  F.  A 
Jam*9^  Life  of  Henry  IV.  Lond.  1847.  8  vols.  8.  Jjord  Mnhon^  Life  of  Louis  Pr.  of  CcHtde,  New 
York.  1348. 12.  Anon,  Life  of  L<»uis  of  Bourbon,  Pr.  of  Conde,  from  Uie  French.  Lond.  1693.  2  T<rfa. 
8.  Maimbourg,  W.  of  the  League,  from  the  Fr.  by  Dryden,  Lond.  16S4.  8.  Ranke^  Givll  wan  and 
Monarchy  in  France  in  the  16th  Jc  17Ui  centt  Lond.  1852.  2  vols.  8.  M,  dietelnaii^  Mom.  of  Fran* 
cU)  n.  &,  Charles  IX.  from  the  Fr.  Lond.  1724  f.  R.  de  BduUU^  A.  des  Dues  de  Guise,  Par.  1SI0.  S 
voU  8.    Blackwood's  Mag.  Apr.  1350.  (Eclcc  Mag.  Dec.  1850.)  ] 

II.  Lacretfll^,  H.  de  France,  pendant  les  guerrea  de  rel.  Par.  ISlS&s.  4  vols.  A.  L.  ITerrmaw^ 
Fr.  Rel.  n  Burgerktiegc  im  16  Jahrh.  LpA.  1828.  Browning^  IL  of  the  Hogaenots.  LomL  1889.  S  roliw 
Captfigne^  II.  de  la  Ref.  do  la  ligue  ct  da  rugne  de  Henri  IV.  Par.  ISSls.  8  vob.  L.  Ranhf^  fnmL, 
Oefl^h.  im  16.  u.  17.  Jhh.  Stuttg.  1352.  vol.  L  \^Mr%.  Miirnhy  II.  of  the  Prol.  Ref  in  France,  Pbllad. 
1851.  2  vols.  12.  £.  Sm^lley,  H.  of  the  Ref  in  France,  New  York.  8  vols.  12.  (7A.  WrU».  IL  of  the 
Prot  Ref  in  France.  Lond.  1854.  2  vols.  12.  A  with  an  Append,  by  //  W.  Herbert,  New  York.  1854. 
2  vola.  12.    O.  de  Felice,  YL  of  the  Protestants  of  France,  fh>m  the  Fr.  Load.  1853.  9  vola.  a] 

§  865.    Night  of  St.  Bartholomew. 

The  rise  and  fall  of  the  sects  in  the  Southern  provinces,  a  liberal  adniim»- 
tration  of  ecclesiastical  laws,  and  an  extensive  cultivation  of  polite  literature, 
had  prepared  the  way  for  the  entrance  of  Protestantism  into  France.  The 
hearts  of  the  first  converts  to  it  wore  gained  by  Luther^s  writings,  bnt  the  first 
churches  in  France  were  established  by  her  own  sons,  Calvin  and  Beza.  The 
appropriate  business  of  the  Sorbonne  was  not  neglected,  and  Luther's  seditions 
writings  were  condemned  in  due  season,  (a)  Francis  I.  sometimes  thought 
of  effecting  a  peaceable  reformation,  and  even  invited  Melanothon  to  come 
to  him  for  that  purpose.    But  the  policy  of  the  French  court  at  that  period 

a)  Puritanorum  Libri  Symb.  ed.  Nicmeyer.  Lps.  1840.    Sack.  (p.  434)  voL  II.  p.  tflasL    X  O.  fu 
Budlof,  d.  Westminster  Syn.  (Zeitacb.  t  hist  Th.  1850.  IL  2.)    [  W.  M.  I/eiheHngUm^  HIat  ct 
Westm.  Aw«em.  New  York.  1848.  12.] 

h)  OUrer  Cromwell's  Life,  Letters  Sc  Speeches,  by  71  Carlyle,  Lond.  1845.  %  vola.  [J,  H. 
rtAxOtigni,  The  Protector,  a  Vindication,  New  York.  184a  12.  HarrU,  Life  of  O.  a  Lond.  1T«4  » 
J.  T.  madley.  Life  of  O.  C.  Now  York,  184a  12.]— FMiwrniin,  Gesch.  Cromw.  A.  d.  Fr.  r.  Biriy 
Lpa.  18S0. 

o)  Determin.  Tlieol  Fac  Paris,  super  doctr.  Lath.  d.  15.  Apr.  1521.    \Q0rde%^  H.  B«f.  Monamm. 
Y  lOsa  ]    MeUincth,  ApoL  adv.  AiriM  Paris  theologaatror.  dMr.  Vit  1081. 


CHAP.  III.  EUROPEAN  SEFOBM.  $  866.  FRANCE.  BEZA.        427 

indaced  it  to  favor  the  Protestants  in  Germany,  and  to  burn  them,  especially 
the  Waldenscs,  in  great  numbers  (1545)  in  France.  (()  Besides,  although 
Melancthon  freely  consented  to  the  king's  proposal,  Luther  was  suspicious  of 
it,  and  would  have  nothing  to  do  with  a  reformation  in  which  the  spirit  of 
Erasmus,  and  not  a  love  of  the  gospel  prevailed,  (c)  The  French  court  was 
also  influenced,  not  merely  by  its  zeal  for  religion,  but  by  its  political  fears 
and  hatred  of  a  sect  which  denounced  as  capital  offences  crimes  nnblushingly 
practised  in  the  royal  paliice.  But  in  spite  of  persecutions,  sometimes  proba- 
My  produced  by  enthusiastic  violations  of  Catholic  feelings,  the  Huguenots 
increased,  especially  in  the  south,  and  united  themselves  together  at  a  Gene- 
ral Synod  in  Paris  (1559).  The  Ccmtession  of  Faith  which  they  there  adopted 
was  Calvinistic,  and  their  ecclesiastical  constitution  was  representative,  com- 
bining independent  congregations  and  a  united  general  Church,  (d)  Many  of 
the  nobility  of  the  kingdom,  the  Bourbons,  with  the  title  of  King  of  Xavarre, 
and  the  noble  Chatillons,  ranged  themselves  at  the  head  of  this  party,  and  its 
political  power  became  formidable.  During  the  reigns  of  two  successive 
kings,  whose  intellectual  inferiority  rendered  a  regency  always  indispensable 
(after  1559),  their  mother,  Catharine  de  Medki^  held  the  actual  reins  of  au- 
thority, while  the  Dukes  of  Guise  supported  by  the  Catholics,  and  the  princes 
of  Bourbon  by  the  Huguenots,  contended  for  the  regency.  In  the  strife  of 
these  leaders  the  queen-mother  found  the  necessary  condition  of  her  supre- 
macy. At  the  religious  conference  of  Poiasy  (1561),  in  the  presence  of  the 
assemblecl  court,  Beza  succeeded  in  truly  and  brilliantly  defending  the  new 
feith  against  the  whole  prelatic  strength  of  France.  («)  In  the  edict  of  Janu- 
ary (1562)  the  Huguenots  obtained  the  right  to  hold  public  worship  any  where 
except  in  the  principal  cities.  (/)  But  this  privilege  was  regarded  as  an 
abomination  by  the  city  of  Paris  and  the  Catholic  population  generally,  and 
was  derided  with  sanguinary  violence  by  the  Duke  of  Guise.  During  the 
same  year,  therefore,  hostilities  were  commenced  with  all  the  aggravations  of 
a  civil  and  religious  war,  and  were  three  times  renewed  after  as  many  treaties 
of  peace.  The  Catholic  governmental  party  were  assisted  by  Spanish  and  papal 
troops,  and  the  Reformed  by  English  gold  and  German  blood,  (jg)  Finally,  at 
the  peace  of  St,  Germain  (1570)  the  Huguenots  were  guaranteed  the  posses- 
sion of  freedom  of  conscience,  a  degree  of  publicity  in  religious  worship,  equal 
political  privileges,  and  a  few  fortified  towns  as  securities  for  the  future.  In 
token  of  a  complete  reconciliation  the  king's  sister  was  given  in  marriage  to 
Eenry  of  Kavarre.  All  the  Protestant  leaders  were  invited  to  Paris  to  cele- 
brate the  nuptials.  There,  on  the  night  of  St.  Bartholomew,  1572,  the  queen- 
mother  gave  the  signal  for  a  massacre  which  had  long  been  the  subject  of 
conversation,  but  was  then  resolved  upon  under  the  impulse  of  the  moment. 
During  this  fatal  night  twenty  thousand  Huguenots,  with  the  brave  General 


V)  Corp,  Rff  Tol  IL  p.  741.  8M.  879.  904u.    Sirobel  MeL  Raf  nach  Frankr.  N&rnb.  17M.    a 
BAmidt,  d.  UniuDS-Vormcbe  Franz  I.  (Zelt^€h.  C  hisL  Tb.  IS^a  H.  I.) 

c)  EL  de  la  porvcuUon  et  saccagement  du  peuple  de  M^rindol  et  de  Cabri^rea  et  autres  drooii- 
toUns  appeloa  VaudolSb  1506.    BeMa,  I,  SSas. 

d)  Number,  CoL  p.  811m.       e)  Baum,  Beza  vol  IL  p.  liSaa. 
/)  B^om  vol.  I. :  Recaell  d^dits  pw  Iss. 

g)  r,  W.  BtiriKold,  DeataoliL  a.  d.  Hiigen.  IMS.  toL  L 


428  MODERN  CHUSCH  HISTORY.    PER.  Y.    A.  D.  1517-ie4& 

Coligny  were  murdered,  presenting  a  horrid  earnest  of  the  future  revolution. 
A  Te  Deum  was  sung  at  Rome  by  the  order  of  Gregory  XIII.  in  honor  of 
this  extermination  of  Chrlst^s  enemies.  (A) 

§  860.     Edict  of  Nantes, 

Those  wlio  had  escaped  the  massacre  now  armed  themselves  for  vengeance 
with  the  courage  of  despair,  and  once  more  conquered  from  their  enemies  a 
recognition  of  their  rights  (1576).  Henry  of  Navarre,  who  had  been  spared, 
and  compelled  to  deny  his  faith,  assumed  the  position  which  naturally  be- 
longed to  him,  and  became  the  leader  of  the  Huguenots.  But  the  Guises,  in 
alliance  with  Philip  II.,  now  formed  a  Holy  League^  in  which  a  majority  of 
the  nobles  and  people  swore  that  they  would  extenninatc  the  heretics. 
Chnrles  IX.  died  under  the  torture  of  terrible  dreams  (1574).  Henry  III,  was 
compelled  to  violate  the  treaty  of  peace,  but  finally,  disgusted  with  the  tyranny 
of  the  Holy  League,  he  had  Henry ^  Duke  of  Guise,  the  Gideon  of  Catholic 
France,  assassinated,  and  the  Cardinal  of  Guise  executed,  fled  before  the  fury 
of  the  Catholic  populace  to  the  camp  of  the  King  of  Navarre,  was  excom- 
municated by  the  pope,  and  was  at  last  assassinated  by  the  Dominican,  Clem- 
ent (1589).  By  this  death  of  the  last  of  the  house  of  Valois  the  throne  de- 
scended by  inheritance  to  Henry  of  Navarre,  whose  title  had  been  declared 
invalid  by  the  pope  and  the  league.  After  many  severe  struggles  to  gain  pos- 
session of  his  royal  rights,  and  finding  that  he  could  never  hope  to  give  peace 
to  his  subjects  so  long  as  the  greater  portion  of  them  regarded  him  as  a  here- 
tic, Henry  IV,  concluded  that  France  was  worth  the  offering  of  a  mass  (1598). 
As  soon,  however,  as  his  kingdom  became  settled,  he  secured  to  bis  real  com- 
panions in  faith  by  the  irrevocable  Edict  of  Nantes  (1598)  freedom  of  reli- 
gious faith,  the  public  worship  of  God  with  only  a  few  trifling  restrictions,  all 
their  rights  as  citizens,  and  great  privileges  as  an  organized  politiciil  corpora- 
tion, (a)  They  were  indeed  to  pay  tithes  to  the  established  Church,  but  were 
to  be  free  from  all  kinds  of  episcopal  jurisdiction.  Although  these  conces- 
sions did  not  completely  satisfy  even  the  Huguenots,  it  required  the  whole 
royal  power  to  enforce  compliance  with  the  edict  among  the  magistrates,  and 
in  the  provinces  opposed  to  it.  But  just  as  France  had  begun  to  enjoy  the 
highest  prosperity  under  his  administration,  just  as  he  was  about  to  execute 
the  most  enlightened  schemes  for  the  permanent  pacification  of  Europe, 
Henry  fell  beneath  the  dagger  of  Ravaillac  (May  14,  1610).  The  peaceftil 
sons  of  the  old  Huguenot  heroes  were  finally  driven  to  insurrection  by  a 
series  of  violations  of  their  rights,  and  Cardinal  Richelieu  by  the  power  of 
his  intellect  overthrew  all  opposition,  and  disarmed  them  as  a  political  party. 
At  the  same  time,  by  an  act  of  amnesty  at  Nismes  (1629),  he  secured  to  them 
all  those  ecclesiastical  rights  which  had  been  guaranteed  in  the  Edict  of 
Nantes;  but  by  various  persecutions  and  frequent  apostasies  the  reformed 


h)  Attdin,  H.  de  Ift  8.  Barth^leroy.  Par.  1S2S.     WaohUr,  d.  BInthoohzelt  Lps.  (1326^)  1 
Against  Capengue:  R(inJc«:  hist  poIlL  Zeitsch.  1885.  vol.  II.  St  8.  4e  Franz.  Oesch.  vol  L  p. 
W.  G.  Sot^an,  Franlcr.  u.  d.  BarUiuloinausnactit  (Raumer's  hist  Tasoheub.  18M.) 

a)  BenoUty  Monn.  p.  62s& 


CHAP.  IIL    EUBOPEAN  BKFORM.    $  867.  8PANIABD9.    ITALIANS.  429 

Church  was  reduced  to  not  more  than  half  the  strength  which  it  possessed 
before  the  night  of  St.  Bartholomew,  (b) 

§  3G7.    Spain  and  Italy, 

U.  Gedde$,  Martjrologiam  eor.  qni  In  Ui«p.  etc  {Jfonh^m.  Dss.  ad  U.  ceo.  Alt  1783.  p.  668.) 
B.  CimMlri,  Relat  de  niartt  Prt»L  In  IIJsp.  {GerdM^  Serin,  vol.  IV.  P.  II.)  JPCrie,  II.  of  the  pro- 
greM  &  »appreMlon  of  tbo  Eeform.  In  Spain.  Edinb.  1829.  Adol/o  de  Castro,  II.  de  los  Protev 
tantes  E»panolos.  Cadiz.  1S51.  [The  Spanish  Protestanta  and  their  iiersecntion  under  Piiilip  II.,  frum 
the  Spani&h  of  De  Catiro,  by  T.  Parker.  Lond.  1S52.  a  H.  Watson,  Philip  IL  of  Spain.  New  Yorlj. 
1S18.  $  y-Gtrdetii,  Spec  Ital.  refurmatae.  L.  B.  1765.  4  Ji^Crte,  II.  of  the  progresH  &  auppr.  of  tlie 
Uet  in  luly.  Edlnb.  1327.  C\  F.  Leopold^  u.  d.  Uraaclien  d.  Rcll  u.  dercn  Yerfall  in  Ital.  (Zeitsch. 
£  hbL  Th.  1S43.  II.  2.) 

In  the  train  of  the  emperor  the  seeds  of  the  Reformation  were  conveyed 
to  Spain,  where  they  were  cherished  perhaps  even  by  some  who  surrounded 
his  dying  bed,  (a)  and  certainly  were  received  with  the  highest  enthusiasm,  in 
some  instances  from  a  patriotic  resistance  to  the  iuquisition,  but  in  others 
from  a  profound  religious  feeling,  which  found  satisfaction  in  the  reformed 
doctrine  of  justification.  But  Catholicism,  especially  the  worship  of  the 
saints,  is  deeply  rooted  in  the  obstinate  spirit  of  the  Spanish  people.  Purity 
of  faith  is  as  highly  valued  by  a  Spaniard  as  purity  of  blood,  and  he  would 
not  scruple  to  imbrne  his  hands  in  the  blood  of  a  brother  who  had  apostatized 
from  the  faith,  (ft)  Martyrdom  therefore  had  no  terrors,  and  when  Philip 
had  exhausted  the  immense  resources  of  his  empire  in  endeavoring  to  put  down 
the  religious  revolution  among  other  nations,  the  inquisition  ettectually  silenced 
the  arguments  of  Protestantism  by  throwing  into  prison  and  there  putting  to 
death  all  persons  suspected  of  heresy,  or  by  the  popular  pageantry  of  an  anto 
da  fe.  In  Italy  ^  the  contempt  into  which  the  clergy  had  fallen,  and  the  ex- 
chisive  engagement  of  worldly  men  in  the  studies  of  polite  literature,  had 
prodaced  a  spirit  which  hailed  the  movement  in  Germany  with  great  joy.  By 
means  of  literary  societies  of  Protestants  connected  with  the  foreign  armies 
in  their  midst,  and  of  translations  of  the  writings  of  the  Reformers  generally 
nnder  assumed  names,  individual  friends  or  congregations  were  gained  in 
nearly  all  the  principal  towns,  and  especially  in  Ferrara,  under  the  protection 
of  the  heroic  Duchess  of  Este,  a  daughter  of  the  King  of  France.  (<•)  Oppor- 
tunities, however,  were  found  for  the  indulgence  of  evangelical /tef/zV/^*  in  the 
Old  Church,  (d)  or  they  were  divided  among  themselves  by  controversies  re- 
specting the  Lord's  Supper,  and  by  the  conduct  of  those  who  were  hostile  to 
an  ecclesiastical  systems,  and  therefore  wished  to  destroy  or  at  least  encroach 
upon  that  portion  of  the  Catholic  faith  which  was  retained  by  the  reformers. 
Moreover  none  but  the  middle  classes  in  Italy  were  ever  sincerely  devoted  to 
the  cause  of  liberty,  and  the  spirituality  of  the  German  and  French  Protes- 
tants could  never  be  very  popular  among  a  people  so  fond  of  those  arts  which 

&)  Tsschirn^r,  de  caosls  Impeditio  in  Francogal.  sacromm  pabL  emendation  is.  (0pp.  Lpa.  1S39 

p.  818.) 

[a)  Wm.  Stirling,  Cloister  life  of  Charles  V.  Lond.  1852.  8.] 

h)  Claude  SenarcU,  Ilist  vera  de  morte  Jo.  DioziL  IIM.    {Oerdesii  Serin.  anUqoar.  vol.  VIII. 
P.  1.)    Corp.  Ret  roL  VL  p.  113s. 

c)  KHlstor.  Archlr.  1824.  P.  4.  p.  Is.    R  Munch,  K.  v  Este.  Aach.  ISSlss.  2  vols. 

d)  Del  beneflclo  di  Crlsto  about  IMO.  <fe  often.    liiederer,  Nachrr.  toL  IV.  p.  121.  28988. 


430  MODERN  CIIUBCn  HI3T0BT.    FEB.  Y.    A.  D.  1017-1U& 

are  addressed  exclasively  to  the  outward  sense.  When  therefore  the  danger 
was  perceived  at  Rome,  and  an  inquisitorial  tribunal  with  formidable  powers 
was  ai)pointed  there  (1642),  many  fled  beyond  the  Alps,  and  others  recanted 
and  relapsed  into  thoughtle&sness,  indifference,  or  even  insanity,  (e)  Dreading 
the  eloquence  of  martyrdom,  the  inquisition  strnck  terror  into  the  hearts  of 
the  peoi)le  rather  by  imprisonment,  by  consignment  to  the  galleys,  and  by 
secret  executions.  It  was  only  in  Calabria  that  the  members  of  a  few  chorches 
of  the  Waldenses  were  hnnted  to  death  like  wild  beasts  (1560).  Near  the  end 
of  the  sixteenth  century  all  vestiges  of  Protestant  communities  in  Italy  were 
completely  obliterated.  Among  those  who  fled  to  foreign  countries  were  some 
highly  honored  divines  and  prelates,  who,  with  few  exceptions,  spent  their 
lives  in  great  unhappiness.  (/) 


CHAP.  IV.— FANATICS  AND  ULTRAISTS  OF  THE  REFORMATION. 

Schlwttflhurg  ([>.  401)  JZ  W.  Erhkam^  Oc9ch.  d.  prot  Sektc^n  im  Zeita.  d.  Re£  Ilainbc  1S4SL— 
ITagen  (p.  800.)  vol  III. 

§  868.     General  Relations  of  the  Reformation, 

While  some  who  anticipated  and  co-operated  in  effecting  the  Reformation 
finally  shrunk  from  its  results,  in  the  midst  of  the  general  commotions  whidi 
tlien  took  place,  and  the  liberty  which  all  enjoyed,  many  individuals  of  differ- 
ent dispositions  wished  to  share  in  the  privileges  of  the  new  Church  who 
exceeded  either  the  true  limits  of  Protestantism,  or  at  least  those  which  the 
popuhir  mind  could  then  tolerate.  These  extreme  characters  the  reformed 
churches  with  one  common  spirit  violently  rejected.  What  Calvin  sanctioned 
by  a  dark  deed,  Melancthon  praised,  {a)  Luther  remarked  that  the  most 
deadly  acts  of  the  inquisition  might  thus  be  justifled,  and  that  after  all,  the 
hangmen  were  the  most  learned  doctors,  (b)  In  this  way  the  maxim  was 
gradually  formed,  that  errorists  should  be  silenced,  and  that  obstinate  here- 
tics should  not  indeed  be  put  to  death,  but  confined,  and  sent  out  of  the  conn* 
try.  Philip  alone,  among  the  princes,  was  disposed  to  recognize  the  right  of 
all  men  to  liberty  of  conscience,  and  that  persons  of  another  £Edth  may  poe- 
sess  the  essentials  of  true  piety,  (c) 

0)  C.  L.  Roth,  Fr.  Spleras  Lebonsende,  N&rnb.  1829. 

/)  R  g.  Schlosser  (pi  402.  nt.  L)    C.  Schmidt,  Vie  de  Tterre  Martyr  YermfglL  Strub.  188&  4.    JF. 
Meyer,  dlo  ov.  Gcineinde  in  Locarno,  ihre  Aaswand.  naeh  ZQrich  il  weltere  Schlckai  Zar.  ISSte.  f  Toh. 

a)  Otlrlni  Defenslo  orth.  fldel  c  ermres  Sernetl,  nbl  ostonditar,  haeretfoosjare  giadll  eoeromdai 
08«e.  8.L15M.     cTorp.  i?**/ vol.  Yin.  p.  362.    [.SSM/5f n^,  Illst  of  the  Cbnrch,  vol  IL  p.  128L    Spirit 
of  the  ^i1srrim^  vol.  HI.  p.  615.    Bib.  Repertory,  vol.  YIIL  p.  8L   Bma,  Life  of  Oalv.  ed.  by  Sibtcm^ 
note  0.    Henry,  Life  of  C.  vol.  IL  p.  219.] 

h)  De  VTetU  vol.  II.  p.  622.    Walch  vol.  lY.  ^  759.  X.  874.  XY.  1686.  XYL  61.    Yet  Me  /^ 
Wette  vol.  IIL  p.  498.  Y.  99.    Walch  vol  XIII.  p.  442a. 

e)  Brief  an  Job.  Fricdrich  d.  Mittlorn  t.  7.  Man.  1559.    {^Salig.  toL  IIL  p.  486as. 
Beitrr.  vol.  XI.  p.  80488. 


CHAP.  lY.    ULTBAI8TS.    1 889.  ANABAPTISTS.  431 

§  869.    Anabaptists  as  Fanatics, 

L  Jtuiu»  Meniut:  d.  Wiedertenffer  Lere  vnd  gehcimn.  a.  11.  S.  widorlegt  M.  Vorr.  Luth.  Witt. 
1980.  «nd  Von  d-  Qelst  d.  WT.  Witt.  1644.  4.  //  BiMlnger,  d.  \VT.  vrsprnng,  fQrpang,  Sccten.  ZQr. 
1560;  4.'Newe  Zeltung:  r.  d.  WT.  za  MaoBStir.  (MltLuth.  Voir.  a.  Melmncbtb.  Propositionea.)  NQrnb. 
ld8S.  4L  Onto  d.  WT.  za  M.  1A85.  4.  IT.  Dorpiuit^  warbafftigt)  bist  wle  das  Er.  zu  M.  angefangcn 
Tod  darch  d.  WT.  vent^ret  wider  nnfrgelidrt  bat  (Witt)  l&He.  4  Magdeb.  1S47.  //.  a  Kerssen- 
hroiek^  anabcpt  faroris  hist  norratlo.  1564-78.  (defective :  Mencken^  Scrr-  Germ,  vol  IIL  a  poor 
tnna. :  Oeaoh  d.  WT.  za  M.  1771.  4) 

IL  B:  J.  If.  OWf^  Ann.  anabaptiaticL  Baa.  1672.  4.  N.  Krohn,  WT.  Tom.  In  Niederdeutach.  (Hof- 
mannlaner.)  Lps^  1758.  V.  A.  WinUr^  Oescb.  d.  baL  WT.  MQnch.  1809.  //.  Jochmus,  Oescb.  d. 
KReform  za  BL  a.  IbrM  Unterganges  darch  d.  WT.  MQnst  182S.  «/.  Hast,  Gescb.  d.  WT. 
M&nst  lS88w  C.  A.  Oom^ius^  de  fontib.  qnibas  in  Ubt  aeditionia  Mon.  Tiri  ducti  osi  aant  Mon. 
185a    K.  Hiue^  d.  Belch  d.  WT.  (Nene  Propbeten.) 

While  the  Reformers  justified  their  opposition  to  the  papacy  by  appealing 
to  the  Scriptures,  or  to  clear  and  manifest  reasons,  it  was  not  surprising  that 
others,  on  the  contrary,  decidedly  arrogated  to  themselves  as  individnab 
what  the  Chnrch  claimed  for  herself  in  general,  and  that  fanatical  persons 
mistook  their  own  passionate  impulses  for  divine  inspirations.    Their  r^ec- 
tion  of  infant  baptism,  in  consistency  with  the  Protestant  doctrine  of  faith, 
and  on  account  of  its  want  of  Scriptural  authority,  together  with  their  con- 
sequent repetition  of  the  baptism  of  adult  believers,  became  the  distinctive 
badge  of  their  party.    These  Anabaptists,  who  made  their  first  appearance  at 
Zwichan  and  Wittenberg  (1521),  were  nearly  all  put  to  death  in  the  Peasants' 
war,  bat  in  almost  every  part  of  the  country,  a  class  of  enthusiasts  resem- 
Uing  them,  bat  very  unlike  each  other  in  moral  and  religious  character,  be- 
came the  pioneers  and  freebooters  of  the  Reformation.    Some  of  them  were 
persons  who  had  renounced  the  world,  and  others  were  the  slaves  of  their 
own  lusts ;  to  some  of  them  marriage  was  only  an  ideal  religious  communion 
of  spirit,  to  others  it  was  resolved  into  a  general  community  of  wives ;  some 
did  not  differ  from  the  reformers  with  respect  to  doctrine,  but  others  rejected 
original  sin  and  the  natural  bondage  of  the  will,  denied  that  wo  are  to  be 
JQstified  by  the  merits  of  Christ  alone,  or  that  we  can  partake  of  his  flesh, 
and  maintained  that  our  Lord^s  body  was  from  heaven,  and  not  begotten  by 
the  virgin.    As  they  acknowledged  no  call  but  that  which  came  directly 
from  God  within  them,  they  despised  the  ministerial  ofiSce  in  the  Church, 
<nd  though  they  denounced  all  historical  records,  they  justified  themselves  by 
isolated  passages  of  the  Bible  for  overthrowing  all  existing  relations  in  social 
fife.    In  their  assumed  character  of  men  moved  by  the  Holy  Ghost,  they 
Were  of  course  exalted  above  all  law,  and  frequently  exhibited  a  spirit  of 
rebellion  against  every  kind  of  government.    Hence,  among  both  Catholics 
ttid  Protestants  it  was  thought  right  to  punish  them  even  with  death.    In 
funster ^  where  the  Reformation  and  civic  liberty  had  obtained  the  ascend- 
•Qcj  by  rather  violent  measures  (1532),  some  Anabaptista  from  the  Nether- 
*'*d8  having  driven  out  all  who  opposed  them,  formed  a  theocratic  Democra- 
cy (Feb.,  1584),  which  was  to  be  the  commencement  of  Christ's  promised 
^*^gdom  on  earth.    Matthiesen  was  regarded  by  them  as  the  prophet  Enoch, 
•'^^  after  his  heroic  death,  Bockelson  was  received  by  them  as  the  king  of  the 
^orld.    Prophets  were  sent  abroad  in  every  direction,  a  kind  of  community 
^  goods  and  polygamy  were  introduced  among  them,  and  the  most  san- 


432  MODEKN  CUUBGU  HISTORY.    PSK.  Y.    A.  D.  1517-1M8. 

guinary  proceedings  were  enacted  under  a  pretended  divine  inspiration,  until, 
after  a  courageous  defence,  Munster  was  conquered  by  the  neighboring 
princes  (June  24th,  1525).  Their  disorderly  conduct  was  then  arrested  by 
the  sword,  and  the  authority  of  the  hierarchy  and  of  the  nobility  was  re- 
established. 

§  370.     The  Anabaptists  as  an  Orderly  Community,     Collegiantg, 

Menno  Sim.  Fandamentum,  together  with  some  other  unimportant  imall  works.  1575.  0pp. 
AmKt.  164(1  Conip.  Arcbiv.  f.  KOoKtu  ISIl.  vol  II.  R  K.  Hoosfn^  Menno  S.  Lpa.  1348.  J.  C 
Jfhrintj,  ^undl.  II.  v.  den  Tau^e&  b.  1615.)  from  the  Dutch  by  K  ran  Gent.)  Jena.  17iO. — U. 
S<'fif/fi.  II.  Christianorum,  qui  Mcnnonitae  apiiellantur.  Amst  1723.  and  H.  Menn.  plenior  dednctia 
lb.  1729.  (r.  L.  r.  IleihStcitz  and  F.  Wtidtt'ck',  Beitrr.  z.  Konntn.  d.  Unfges.  Gemeinden.  Brsl  1921m. 
2  vols.  A.  Ilttruinger,  das  IIcl  K.  u.  Solmlwoscu  d.  Menn.  Speyer.  1S8I. — J.  Wiggem^  d.  Taafge& 
In  d.  Pfnli.  (Zeltech.  f.  hist  Th.  IjttS.  II.  S.—Ilu^s,  gegcnw.  Zast  d.  Menn.  u.  Colleg.  Jen.  1748.  Ar- 
chir.  t  KG.  1S14.  yoL  I.  Part  a 

The  misfortunes  and  extravagances  of  the  Anabaptists  of  Munster  com- 
pelled those  who  survived  either  partially  to  distrust  their  claims  to  infiiUibil- 
ity  and  their  hopes  of  a  secular  kingdom,  or  to  throw  themselves  upon  the  ex- 
pectation of  an  advent  of  Christ  in  the  future.  These  scattered,  divided  and 
dispirited  commimities  were  collected  into  small  congregations  in  various 
parts  of  the  Netherlands  and  on  the  German  sea-coasts,  by  the  pious  dili- 
gence of  Menno  ^imon^  who  had  formerly  been  a  priest  (d.  1501).  Under 
the  name  of  Assemblies  of  the  Saints,  they  adopted  a  rigid  discij)line,  re- 
jected all  oaths,  war,  lawsuits,  and  divorce  except  for  adultery,  and  prac- 
tised the  washing  of  feet  as  a  sacred  ordinance ;  and  though  they  obeyed 
the  authorities,  they  contended  that  it  did  not  become  a  successor  of  Christ 
to  exercise  worldly  jurisdiction.  Public  toleration  was  conceded  to  them  in 
the  Netherlands  when  the  liberty  of  those  provinces  was  obtained,  and  grad- 
ually it  was  allowed  them  in  England  and  Germany.  But  even  during 
Menno's  life  they  became  divided  on  the  subject  of  the  rigidity  of  excommu- 
nication into  the  Pure  and  the  Gross,  or  on  the  doctrine  of  election  into 
Calvinists  and  Arminians.  With  the  latter  class  the  CoUegiants  became 
united  more  particularly  in  Khynsburg.  This  sect  sprung  up  about  1620, 
when  the  Arminian  clergy  were  excommunicated,  and  three  brothers  of  the 
name  of  Kodde^  ruling  elders  of  more  than  ordinary  proficiency  in  the  Scrip- 
tures, collected  such  as  were  of  the  same  faith  with  themselves  into  assem- 
blies for  prayer  (Collegia).  They  rejected  all  ecclesiastical  offices  for  religions 
instruction,  and  demanded  a  severity  of  morals  such  as  prevailed  in  the 
primitive  Church,  but  they  were  almost  indifferent  with  respect  to  ecclesias- 
tical articles  of  faith.  Hence  persons  of  very  different  sentiments  were  to  be 
found  among  them,  but  tlie  association  by  which  their  congregations  were 
united  was  not  dissolved  until  some  time  in  the  nineteenth  century. 

§  871.    Antitrinitarians. 

Ch.  Sand,  Bibl.  Antitrr.  Freist  (Amst)  1631    F.  &  Book,  Hist  Antltrr.  Sodnlanor.  Lpt.  cti 
glom.  1774s8w  2  vol.\    F.  Trtchael,  M.  Servet  u.  a.  Yorgfinger.  Ueldolb.  1889. 


The  fellowship  of  the  Reformers  with  the  Church  was  shown  by 
inviolable  attachment  to  the  ancient  Catholic  symbols.    But  those  in  yaric^- 


CHAP.  IV.    ULTRAIST8.    |871.  ANTlTEINITARIANai    SEEVETUS.  433 

oonntriee,  and  especially  in  Italy,  who  were  secretly  opposed  to  all  ecclesias- 
tical creeds,  indulged  the  hope  that  they  would  find  an  asylum  in  countries 
possessing  the  Reformation.    Some  of  these,  therefore,  in  the  name  of  the 
Scriptures  or  of  intellectual  freedom,  claimed  the  riglit  to  rejc  t  any  ecclesi- 
astical doctrines,  and  especially  the  doctrine  of  the  Trinity  as  it  had  been 
taught  in  the  Church,  or  in  an  Anabaptu^t  spirit  uttered  opinions  respecting 
this  right  from  a  professed  divine  inspiration.    The  reformers,  however,  has- 
tened as  speedily  as  possible  to  deny  all  fellowship  with  such  heretics,  by  a 
sentence  which  adjudged  such  persons  to  a  capital  punishment.    John  Bench 
thonght  he  discovered  in  the  abundant  h)ve  which  Christ  produced  by  his 
agency  before  he  came  into  the  world,  and  which  lie  typically  represented,  a 
state  of  exaltation  above  the  Scriptures  and  all  laws,  and  yet  led  to  the  pre- 
cise course  of  conduct  which  they  required.    Ilis  education  in  polite  litera- 
ture did  not  raise  him  above  the  secret  practice  of  anabaptism,  in  wliich  he 
thonghf  seven  evil  spirits  were  abjured,  and  seven  good  spirits  were  received 
by  the  believer.    He  was  opposed  to  the  doctrine  of  the  equality  of  the  Son 
with  the  Father  as  a  real  idolatry,  but  the  principal  point  on  which  his  feel- 
ings were  enlisted,  was  one  in  which  he  maintained  that  an  eternal  hell  was 
inconsistent  with  the  divine  mercy.    He  was  merely  expelled  from  the  sphere 
of  his  activity  in  the  cities  of  Upper  Germany,  and  escaped  martyrdom  as  a 
heretic  by  an  early  death  (1528).  (ji)    HiUcr,  a  learned  friend  of  Zwingle  and 
a  popular  poet,  was,  while  full  of  expressions  of  repentance,  beheaded  at  Con- 
fltance  for  his  assertion  of  the  imity  of  God  (1529),  although  he  was  also 
convicted  of  holding  Anabaptist  sentiments  and  of  adulterous  conduct.  (J)) 
Senetus^  a  native  of  Aragon,  and  a  man  of  extensive  acquirements  but  of  a 
restless  dis])osition,  taught  that  the  Deity  was  the  real  essence  of  all  things ; 
that  the  world  in  all  its  forms  is  actually  nothing ;  that  the  Trinity  is  only  a 
revelation  of  the  great  First  Cause  in  the  form  of  the  light  and  the  word 
finally  completed  in  the  incarnation ;  and  that  the  Holy  Spirit  is  merely  a 
mode  in  which  God  communicates  himself  to  created  beings.    He  therefore 
derided  the  Trinity  held  by  the  Church  as  a  three-headed  Cerberus,  and 
thonght  himself  destined  to  be  the  restorer  of  Christianity.     He  was  burned 
by  the  Catholics  in  effigy,  and  by  the  Protestants  in  reality,  at  Geneva 
(1563).  (/•)     Campanns^  who  appealed  from  the  whole  world  to  the  apostles, 
ind  described  the  Son  in  accordance  with  Arian  views,  and  the  Spirit  as  only 
the  influence  by  which  man  was  redeemed  and  assimilated  to  God,  died  in 
prison  at  Cleves  (about  1578).  (^/)     Gentilis^  a  Calabrian,  completed  the  doc- 
trine of  three  Gods  of  unequal  rank,  which  had  been  advanced  by  Grihaldo^ 


•)  Tom  GeseU  O.  (a.  I.  et  a.)  Gei.<t].  Bluincn^nirtl.  (6  fimall  Trcatii^  by  Denck.)  Amst.  1690.— 
^«V«i  vol  III.  p.  275sflL    Jhherle,  J.  Denck  u.  ^  BQchL  v.  Gesetz.  (Stnd  u.  Krft  1961.  H.  Is.) 

^)'r.J.  Breitinger,  Anccd.  de  L.  lleUero.  (Mu«cum  Ilelv.  1751.  vol.  VI.)  IHetrick,  In  d.  Tab. 
Zrit8di.iSM.II.  i. 

c)  DUIL  do  Trin.  (IlAffen.)  1532.  Chrlstlani5mi  restitutio.  (VIen.)  1653.— Relation  da  procia 
^'inUoal  lnifnt6  a  Geneve  contre  NL  Servet,  redlgeo  d'aprea  los  documcnta  originaux  par  A.  RillieU 
^  ISU.  Oileini  Udells  expos,  orrorum  Serv.  a.  I.  1554.— J/baAtfim,  Ubu  Serv.  Ulmst  1727.  4. 
■^^cue  Xat-br.  v.  d.  Arzte  Serv.  IIlnisL  17r)0.  6.  HeberU^  Serv.  Trln.  u.  Chrl-rtol.  (Tub.  Zeltacb. 
^  H.  a.)  Biiur,  Dreielnlgk.  vol.  III.  p.  4&W.  \W.  IT.  Drummand,  Life  of  Servetua.  Jjoml.  1S48. 
^  ^-  WrigM,  Ap«L  for  Serv.  Lond.  1S05. 12.    /7«»ry,  Life  of  Calv.  voL  XL  and  aa  In  {  86S.  Dt  a.} 

^  SchOhom,  do  Camp.  (Amoenitt  liter,  vol  XL) 

28 


434  MODEEN  cnuncii  history,   per.  v.  a.  D.  WU-ldlS. 

a  learned  jurist,  by  maintaining  that  the  Son  was  another  God  of  the  same 
nature,  but  derived  from  the  Father.  lie  saved  his  life  by  a  recantation,  an 
ecclesiastical  penance,  and  an  act  of  perjury  at  Geneva,  but  lost  it  at  Berne, 
as  ho  thougTit,  in  honor  of  the  Father  (156(5).  (<•)  David  Joris^  a  painter 
from  Delft,  who  had  before  been  highly  esteemed  as  a  prophet  in  the  new 
kingdom  at  Munster,  taught  that  the  Trinity  was  merely  a  revelation  of 
God  in  three  different  ages  of  the  world,  and  assembled  together  Anabap- 
tists of  all  kinds,  with  the  promise  that  they  should  take  possession  of  the 
earth  as  the  Israelites  did  of  Canaan  in  the  age  of  the  Holy  Spirit,  which  had 
made  its  appearance  in  him.  He  was  whipped  and  outlawed,  but  found  an 
honorable  asylum  under  an  assumed  name  at  Basle  (d.  1556).  {/)  Others 
took  refuge  in  Poland,  and  were  there  at  first  known  under  the  common 
name  of  Dissidents,  but  were,  after  1565,  expelled  from  the  Reformed  Church 
as  Unitarians.  They  were  not  entirely  free  from  persecution,  but  through 
the  favor  of  some  powerful  supporters  they  obtained  a  general  centre  for 
their  body  at  Itacau  (1569).  (y)  In  Transylvania  a  public  recognition  of  the 
Unitarians  was  obtained  (1571)  by  the  influence  of  the  Piedmonteso  Blan- 
drata^  the  private  physician  of  the  prince.  Jesus  was  honored  by  this  sect 
simply  as  a  man,  but  one  who  was  richly  endowed  by  God  and  exalted  for 
dominion  over  the  whole  world.  Adoration  was  paid  to  him  by  most  of 
them,  and  those  who  refused  this  were  persecuted.  (Ji) 

§  872.     Soeinians, 

L  BibL  fratriim  Polon.  Irenop.  (Amst)  165d.  8  vols,  f.  Ch,  Otdorodt^  Unterrichtang  r.  d. 
IlAuptp.  fL  clir.  R.  lUk.  1004.  and  oft  Catecb.  Racov.  (1C09.  12.  and  oft.  Poln.  1605.)  ed.  Oeder^ 
Frcf.  1789.  WUiowatiu*,  Rel  raUonalia.  1685.  Amst.  1708.  Stan,  LutUniecii,  U.  ref.  Pol 
FreteL  1695. 

II.  Jituideus,  de  orlg.  Soclnian.  Jen.  1725.  4.  Ziegler.  Lohrbg.  d.  F.  S<»c  (/7«»iv,  N.  Mag.  roL 
IV.  p.  20l8.<».)  E.  Bengel,  Ideen  i.  Erkl.  d.  Soc  Lchrbgr.  (Tub.  Miitr.  St.  14.'a)  O.  FocJb,  dw-  8o- 
einlanlfimufl  in  der  Oesammtontw.  d.  cbriatl.  Geistfa,  nacb  s.  bist  Verlauf.  u.  Lebrbegr.  KM  1811 
SAbUi. 

Laelim  Socinvs,  belonging  to  the  noble  family  of  the  Sozini  of  Siena, 
spent  his  time,  after  1547,  in  reformed  countries  in  the  character  of  an 
inquiring  but  sceptical  man  of  letters,  under  the  advice  and  toleration  of  the 
reformers,  and  highly  esteemed  for  his  honesty  and  intelligence  (d.  15G2).  (a) 
It  was  by  his  nephew  and  heir,  Fattshis  Socinvs  (d.  1604),  that  the  Unitarians 
in  Poland,  with  whom  he  became  connected,  became  organized  as  a  commn- 


e)  B.  Aretius,  Yal.  GcntlHs  Justo  capitis  suppliclo  affect!  11.  Gen.  1567.  4.  Gent  fmpietatiun  tx- 
plicatio  exactis  Senatos  Gene  v.  c.  praof.  Th.  Bezue^  Ocn.  1667.  4. 

/)  T  n'onderboeiy  1542.  4. 15.V.  t—Uist  Dar.  Jovis  d.  Enketzen,  dareh  d.  Unlr.  BaaeL  Baa 
15.'>9.  4.  II.  vitae  Dav.  Geoi^i  baeresiarcbae,  conscr.  ab  ipstna  genero,  Nie,  JBUmliJbio,  ed.  J.  I^ 
v<u«,  Pavontr.  1642.  12     Je*sfniu»^  aufgedeckte  Larve  Dav.  OeorgIL  Kiel  1670.  4. 

g)  Cateche&l«  et  Conf.  fldoi  coetus  per  Pol.  oongregati  in  nomine  J.  C.  Cracor.  1574  12.  known  a» 
the  1.  Racovian  Catecbism. 

h)  Blanir.  Cont  Antitr.  c  refUtatlone  FlacU,  cd.  Jlenke,  tilmat  1794.  (Oppi  aead.  pi  MS.> 
HeberU,  a.  il.  Ix^bren  v.  Bland.  (Tab.  Zeitacbr.  1840.  II.  4.)— Samma  unlr.  'lb.  chr.  sec.  UnltaiioA 
Claadiup.  17S7.    (RoMnmiUUr,  in  Stiiudlin's  u.  Tzach.  Arcbiv.  t  KGeach.  toL  L  U.  1.) 

a)  Ch.  F.  lUgen,  Vita  L.  BocinL  Lps.  1814.  Symbokie  ad  Tit  et  doct  L.  a  UL  L|Mi  8  P*. 
1886-14.  4.  Orelli,  L.  Soc.  (B&sl.  wias.  Zeitacbr.  1824.  vol  II.  P.  a  p  llSaa.)  /*.  7V«eA«^  LeOo 
Bozini  u.  die  Antitrinltarier  sr.  Zclt  Ueidelb.  1844. 


CHAP.  IT.    ULTBAISTS.    1 872.  S0CINIAN9.    1 87a  BCnWENCKFELD.       435 

nity,  and  received  a  complete  system  of  doctrine,  (ft)    The  principal  article 
of  this  was  an  attempt  at  an  accommodation  between  different  parties  by  the 
doctrine,  that  although  Jesus  was  horn  a  mere  man,  he  was  nevertheless 
witliout  any  earthly  father,  and  was  wonderfully  endowed  by  God,  was 
taken  up  into  heaven,  and  as  the  reward  of  his  life  was  deified,  that  he 
might  bo  a  mediator,  to  bring  man,  alienated  from  God  by  sin,  to  the  knowl- 
edge and  grace  of  God,  and  that  he  might  reign  as  the  king  of  his  people  in 
all  periods  of  time.    As  man  is  destitute  of  any  natural  knowledge  of  Grod, 
divine  revelation  is  made  to  correspond  with  the  laws  of  his  mind.    Tlio 
Socinian  explanations  of  the  New  Testament  were  therefore  frequently  of  a' 
bold  and  novel  character,  but  conformed  to  the  pr^'udices  of  a  limited  un- 
derstanding, and  the  ethical  system  adopted  was  more  of  a  social  than  of  a 
rehgions  nature.    Christianity  was  viewed  on  the  whole  as  a  moral  redemp- 
tion by  our  own  efforts.   The  connection  with  the  Anabaptists,  which  Socinus 
found  already  formed,  was  very  soon  broken  off.    Socinianism  was  the  extreme 
of  opposition  to  popery,  and  was  never  a  true  pulsation,  but  the  feverish  ex- 
citement of  the  Protestant  Church  when  it  was  sinking  into  a  chill  ortho- 
doxy.   Its  advocates  were  never  regarded  by  the  Protestants  as  Christians, 
and  it  was  only  in  Altorf,  near  the  commencement  of  the  seventeenth  cen- 
tury, that  they  succeeded  in  forming  an  organized  party.    Even  this  was 
Boon  suppressed.    A  few  literary  men,  especially  among  the  Arminians,  have 
been  obliged  to  defend  themselves  against  the  reproach  of  Socinianism.  (e) 
In  Poland,  the  attack  upon  Protestantism  was  most  ferocious  against  the  So- 
dnians.     In  1638  they  lost  possession  of  Hacau,  where  the  Polish  nobility 
had  been  educated,  and  in  1658  they  were  entirely  exterminated  under  the 
ostensible  charge  of  being  traitors  to  the  government.  {<T)    The  exiled  con- 
gregations found  refuge  under  the  great  Elector,  and  individuals  took  up  their 
residence  in  the  Netherlands,  but  the  proper  time  for  Socinianism  as  a  sect 
WIS  DOW  past. 

§  373.     Caspar  SchtcencJcfcld  of  Ossing,     Sebastian  Franc?.'. 

Forhiswrtting^  tee  WalcK,  Bibl.  theol.  Th.  IL  pi  OIsa.  Kurze  Lebeai^b.  Schvr.  without  place.  1697. 
Hht  Nacbr.  v.  Schw.  sanit  Anzahl  sr.  Schrr.  Prenyl  1744.  Die  wesenU.  Lchre  dea  Herrn  G  8chw. 
*•  *r.  GluibenRgcn(*s.<H.Mi.  Divl.  177(1  {JdAne)  Dankb.  Erin,  an  d.  Schwenkfcldcr  zu  Piiila<le]i>bla.  GOrL 
'^^t'^Wiffatuf,  <\^  Hchwcnkfeldianismo.  Lps.  15S6.  4.  Srl/kam,  p.  857sft.— /"rancX* ;  I'arHdoxa  2S0 
<!•  L  Wanderred.  aus  d.  H.  8.  (Ulm.  1534.)  4.  Baain  d.  Wise.  Gutea  u.  Bi«ea.  Vim.  1504.  4.  DIo 
<^lo  Arch.  Aug»b^  lASS.  f.  Das  verbuthschiert  mit  5ibt>n  i^igeln  verschlussno  Bnch.  (Ibid.)  1589. 
t-&  TV  Wald,  do  vita  scripUs  et  Byst  myrt.  S.  Francl.  KrL  1793.  4.  K.  am  Ende,  kloine  iiachleae 
«»i  anvollst  Nachrr.  v.  8.  Fr.  NOrnb.  1796.  4.  mil  2.  Fortas.  179A-99.  /Tagen  voL  III.  p.  814aa. 
^•^iam,  p.  «S««.    C  T.  Kaim,  ±  llet  d.  Eeicbwt  Ulm.  Stuttg.  1851.  p.  269*8. 

As  the  Reformation  found  salvation  only  in  the  Scriptures  but  by  means 
^  a  true  and  saving  faitli,  the  latter,  when  it  was  especially  ardent,  some- 
^njes  rose  against  the  narrowness  and  uncertainty  of  all  merely  external 

*•)  Opp.  Ireoop.  1650.  2  vols,  t  {Prtypcoviwi)  Vita  F.  8.  1686.  4.  before  Opp,  Soc.  u.  Bibl.  tnL 
^''•onorum.    Soulmiru,  Mem.  of  the  Life  of  F.  8.  Lond.  1777. 

«)  HamhdcK  Elnl.  In  d.  K.  8treit.  d.  ev.  K.  mil  d.  Soc  Cob.  1753.  2  volii  4.  ZeUner,  II.  Crypto- 
^olstnl  Altorflnafl  Acad.  Infesti.  Lps.  1729.  2  vols.  4. 

<0  Prodltiones  Arianorani  patriae  ernae  sub  tempus  belli  Saecld.  1657.  4.  On  the  other  aide :  Zw- 
'^'^^^cii  Memoriale  in  cauw  Fratrum  Unitar.  8tcUnL  1659. 


436  MODERN  ClIUKCn  HISTOET.    PEB.  V.    A.  D.  1B17-164S. 

Scripture.  The  confidence  which  was  thus  produced  in  an  immediate  and 
living  communion  with  Christ  is  well  illustrated  by  the  case  of  Schwrneifeld 
(d.  1561).  In  the  court  of  the  Duke  of  Lignitz,  he  formed  a  centre  of  influ- 
ence in  behalf  of  the  Reformation  in  Silesia,  and  (even  in  1525)  was  on 
terms  of  personal  intercourse  with  Luther.  lie,  however,  came  gradually  to 
the  conclusion,  that  although  Luther  was  correct  in  opposing  the  papacy,  the 
new  kingdom  proposed  by  the  reformers  was  to  be  wholly  conformed  to  the 
outward  letter,  and  therefore  was  not  likely  to  aflford  much  assistance  in  the 
Christian  life.  On  his  banishment  from  Silesia  he  betook  himself  to  Suabia 
(1528),  where  he  maintained  a  friendly  intercourse  with  the  Protestant 
princes,  and  a  violent  controversy  with  the  Protestant  theologians.  By  the 
latter  he  was  held  up  as  the  chief  of  all  fanatics,  but  he  seems  to  have  propa- 
gated his  principles  without  attempting  to  found  an  independent  party.  The 
main  points  of  his  system,  in  addition  to  all  kinds  of  strange  sentiments 
respecting  the  deification  of  Christ's  flesh  for  us,  that  it  might  be  the  food 
of  our  souls  in  the  Lord's  Supper,  and  respecting  Christ's  death  as  a  {lenalty 
paid  to  Satan  for  man,  {a)  were  his  exclusive  regard  for  sincere  piety  in  the 
heart  by  means  of  a  gracious  incarnation  of  Jesus  Christ  within  us,  and  a  con- 
sequent iudift'ercnco  to  the  mere  letter  of  the  Scripture  or  the  visible  Church. 
A  few  followers  and  congregations,  especially  in  North  America,  have  pre- 
served some  true  memorials  of  him  until  the  present  time,  (h)  "With  similar 
views,  but  with  more  learning  and  moderation,  Thamerus  (d.  1569)  has  de- 
fended the  redeemed  and  divinely  enlightened  conscience  in  opposition  to  a 
reliance  upon  the  sacred  letter,  lie  was  therefore  obliged  to  fall  out  with 
the  reformers,  and  thereby  proved  that  the  Catholic  doctrine  on  this  sul^ect 
was  more  consistent  with  sound  common  sense  than  the  Protestantism  of 
that  period,  (r)  The  idea  that  God  is  continually  making  revelations  to  all 
believers,  was  not  by  any  means  incredible  to  enlightened  human  reason. 
The  principal  champion  for  this  doctrine  was  Seh.  Franel\  originally  from 
Woerd  (Donauwoerth,  d.  at  Basle  about  1543),  successively  a  priest,  a  Lu- 
theran preacher,  a  soap  manufacturer,  a  learned  printer,  and  always  a  popular 
writer.  ((/)  He  found  edification  in  the  apparent  contradictions  and  obecnre 
passages  of  the  Scriptures,  the  letter  of  which  he  regarded  as  the  sword  of 
Antichrist  by  which  the  Christian  is  slain,  and  yet  the  sacred  pyx  in  which 
the  true  Christ  is  conveyed  to  men.  He  allowed  himself  to  believe  nothing 
except  on  the  united  testimony  of  his  own  heart  and  conscience,  and  he  pro- 
fessed subjection  to  no  master  but  himself.  He  was  acquainted  with  ancient 
philosophy,  was  familiar  with  the  mysticism  of  the  middle  ages,  and  de- 
scribed the  Deity  as  the  everlasting  essence,  which  needed  not  the  existenoo 
of  any  creature,  and  yet  pervaded  and  acted  through  all  created  forms.  Tha 
will  of  man,  however,  being  free,  may  either  be  governed  by  the  divino 
nature  within  him,  or  may  pervert  this  nature  to  unliallowed  objects.   When— 


a)  O.  L.  Hahn^  Schw.  Sententia  do  Chr.  persona  ot  opere.  Vrat  1S47. 

[&)  J.  SchulU,  in  Ul8t  of  Kcl.  DenominaUons  in  U.  S.  (Uaniaburg.  1S49.  9.)  p.  657.] 

c)  A.  ITeantUr,  Theob.  Thaoier,  A  Bopraca.  u.  Vorginger  moderner  QeiAteerichtiini^  BrL  I8li. 

d)  Vom  Lastcr  d.  Trunkenh.  1581.  4.  Clironica,  Zeytbuoh  u.  GescbycbtbiboL  Straaab.  IMl.  C 
Cofimographie  a  Weltbach.  ISM.  t  Bprucbworter,  Scbune  Weiseo,  Herrllche  Clugraden  o.  Hoff- 
^>rach.  FrakH  IML  and  oft. 


CHAP.  IV.    ULTBAI8T8.    1 87a.  FBANCK.  437 

ever  he  passively  sobmits  to  it,  God  becomes  man  in  him.  Thas  in  Socratef^, 
in  Christ,  and  in  others,  what  has  been  concealed,  unexpressed,  and  even 
anpossessed  in  many,  becomes  manifest,  and  God  becomes  dependent  in  the 
flesh  that  man  may  become  deified  in  following  liim  on  the  way  to  the  cross. 
Franck  was  driven  out  of  Strasbourg  and  Ulm,  and  the  Landgrave  and  Me- 
lanctbon  (f)  uttered  warnings  against  him  as  the  dcviFs  special  and  favorite 
blasphemer.  (/)  He  thought  the  papacy  so  worn  out  in  the  hands  of  the 
devil,  that  when  Satanic  influences  could  find  no  concealment  behind  St. 
Peter's  chair,  a  new  papacy  had  been  established  as  speedily  as  possible. 
The  Christianity  which  he  endeavored  to  promote  was  to  be  free  from  all 
restndnta,  from  sectarian  policy,  from  factious  strife,  and  indeed  from  all  ex- 
ternal things.  But  so  completely  did  he  fall  out  with  the  ruling  spirits  of 
his  age,  that  no  course  remained  for  him  but  with  them  to  wait  patiently  for 
the  approaching  end  of  this  world,  while  within  himself  the  shores  of  a  new 
world  were  rising  on  his  view. 


CHAP,  v.— CONDITION  AND  RESULTS  OF  PROTESTANTISM. 

Uunde^ageti,  d  dentsche  Proteatantlsm.  Frkf.  (1846-47.)  1850.    D.  ScXenkel,  d.  Weacn  d.  Pro- 
te?t  a.  d.  Qa«Uen  d.  B«C  Zcita.  Schaffb.  1$46sa.  8  vols. 

§  874.     Protestantism  as  a  Principle, 

The  object  of  the  reformers  was  to  return  to  the  purity  of  the  apostolic 
Clmrch,  and  to  remove  the  abuses  which  had  become  almost  universal  dur- 
ing subsequent  centuries,  especially  on  the  subject  of  justification  by  works 
and  the  deification  of  creatures.    They  therefore  maintained  that  the  word 
of  God  was  the  only  authority  in  matters  of  faith,  and  that  human  nature  is 
80  corrupt  that  it  can  attain  salvation  only  by  the  merits  of  Christ,  appropri- 
ated by  a  faith  wrought  by  divine  power,  (o)    The  struggle  after  freedom 
was  regarded  as  a  subordinate  matter,  and  as  a  general  thing  was  very  little 
a  subject  of  attention.    But  as  justification  by  faith  was  a  transaction  which 
took  place  entirely  between  Christ  and  the  heart  of  the  believer  himself,  and 
they  were  obliged  to  oppose  the  claim  of  the  existing  Church  to  infallibility 
^d  the  exclusive  power  of  saving  men,  and  as  the  new  Church  could  claim 
no  snch  power  while  struggling  against  the  positive  right,  it  laid  hold  of  that 
^hich  is  eternal  and  abstract.    The  ideal  of  a  perfect  Church  was  therefore 
proposed,  in  which  the  diflferent  churches  were  variously  represented  in  pro- 
Portion  to  their  faith,  although  no  one  of  them  was  ever  perfect.    This  invisi- 
m  Church  therefore  embraced  all  true  believers  in  all  places  on  earth,  (b) 
The  idea  of  Protestantism  was  in  this  way  unconsciously  developed.    The 
^*^  itself  was  of  a  later  origin,  drawn  from  a  prominent  individual  fart 

')  Cl  Sff.  Yol.  IIL  p.  98890.  with  the  snbsciiptlons  of  the  divines  assembled  at  Bmaloald  in  1510. 

/)  Uth.  in  Walch  vol.  XIV.  p.  894 

*)  A.  Domer^  d.  Prindpi  unsrer  Kirche  nach  d.  Innern  Verh.  sr.  zwei  Seltcn.  Kiel.  1841.  D 
***»*W;d.  Pr.  d.  Prot  MIt  be&  Beruchts.  d.  neuesten  Verhandl.  8cliaffh.  1S52. 

^)  "Hie  eisential  Idea  is  found  in :  Ap<A.  Confeim.  Aug.  Art  IV.  Walch  vol.  XX.  p.  1881.  ThA 
^T  Words:  ZtHngli,  brevls  ExposlUo,  art  de  Eccle&la.  Calv.  Inst  IV,  1.  T. 


438  MODERN  CnURCH  niSTOBT.    PER  V.    A.  D.  IBlT-lMa 

and  applied  to  a  ^eat  genera]  idea.  On  the  one  hand,  it  implies  a  continual 
protest  against  the  extravagant  claims  of  Catholicism,  and  on  the  other  an 
acknowledgment  of  a  common  universal  Christianity  wherever  a  heart  is 
found  in  connection  with  Christ.  It  likewise  claims  to  he  the  Christianity 
of  the  heart  and  of  freedom.  So  far,  however,  were  the  reformers  from  per- 
ceiving this  in  the  midst  of  the  excitement  of  their  internal  and  external 
conflicts  of  faith,  that  from  the  time  of  the  convent  of  Berg  and  the  Synod 
of  Dordreclit,  the  Protestant  Church  appears  only  like  a  purified  form  of 
Catholicism.  In  various  ways  it  practicaDy  represented  itself  as  infallible, 
and  even  expressly  claimed  that  there  was  no  salvation  out  of  itself,  (r)  In 
its  doctrinal  statements  respecting  man's  natural  state,  it  wore  the  aspect  of 
a  Christianity  of  bondage.  In  both  Churches  of  the  Reformation  the  Pro- 
testant principle  was  realized  at  first  in  the  highest  degree,  in  accordance 
with  the  type  shown  in  the  character  of  their  respective  founders.  In  the 
Reformed  Church  it  appeared  in  the  fonn  of  the  ascendency  of  a  vigorous 
understanding,  requiring  an  unconditional  return  to  the  forms  of  primitive 
Christianity.  In  the  Lutheran  Church  it  took  the  form  of  a  predominant 
profound  feeling,  and  recognized  an  historical  development  in  the  Church. 
In  the  first  place,  the  disagreement  respecting  the  doctrine  of  the  Lord's 
Supper  which  was  determined  by  this  difference  in  original  character,  could 
hardly  fail  in  producing  the  precise  disagreement  which  afterwards  followed 
with  respect  to  the  two  natures  of  Christ.  Then  the  different  political  throes 
which  attended  the  birth  of  the  respective  Churches,  were  evidently  deter- 
mined by  the  ethical  character  of  each.  The  Lutheran  nations  were  disposed 
to  leave  even  their  earthly  affairs  in  the  hands  of  the  all-controlling  God- 
man,  wiiile  the  Reformed  with  bold  activity  set  about  the  completion  of  the 
work  of  their  heavenly  King.  In  these  diversities  we  may  discover  the 
ground  for  the  difference  of  aims  which  is  discoverable  in  these  Churches ; 
the  Lutheran  fixes  its  eye  principally  upon  the  eternal  salvation  of  man, 
while  the  ultimate  object  of  the  Reformed  is  the  glory  of  Grod.  This  differ- 
ence, however,  is  rapidly  vanishing,  (d) 

§  875.    Morals. 

The  doctrine  of  salvation  by  faith  was  opposed  to  that  of  dependence 
upon  works,  and  the  idea  of  Christian  freedom  was  in  direct  hostility  to  that 
of  the  depression  of  the  intellect  by  human  enactments.  The  simplicity  and 
absolute  character  of  the  moral  law  was  secured  when  evangelical  connaels 
were  regarded  as  only  the  non-essential  means  by  which  its  objects  were  ta 

c)  ZtcingL  de  vera  et  falsa  rel  (0pp.  vol.  II.  p.  192.)  On  tbo  other  band :  Cdlv,  Inatt  L  lY.  e.  flL 
$  Vi.—Mo9er,  Corp.  Jur.  cv.  LQt  178S.  vol.  IL  p.  895.  Comp.  A.  E.  Zeitnng^  1881.  N.  180.  IStt. 
N.  122.  1888.  N.  20$.  180. 

d)  J.  Tickler,  de  Indole  racr.  emendattonls  a  Zw.  instftutae  recte  aeeUmanda.  Tn^  18S7.  M^ 
Gf>bfl,  rel.  Eigenth&ml.  d.  lath.  n.  ref.  K.  Bonn.  1887.  J.  P.  Zan(^  welehe  Odtnnf  febuhrt  d. 
Ki^cnthuinl.  d.  ref.  K.  Z&r.  1S41.  JIagenbacK,  d.  re£  K.  in  Bez.  a  Yerikaa.  n.  Colt  ScfaalTh.  ISlS. 
K.  Strobfl,  u.  d.  Untorach.  d.  Inth.  a.  ref.  K.  (Zoitsch.  £  lath.  Tb.  1811  H.  a)  Zym,  s  Cbarakter  d 
rcC  K  (Stad.  u.  Krit  1843.  II.  8.)  Merle  D'Aubigni,  Lntber  xl  Cahrln.  [transL  in  D'Anb.  and  hffi 
wriHnga,  New  York.  1846.}— il.  Schtceiaer,  GLchre  d.  refl  K.  1844  ToL  L  pw  Tn. 
In  Stad.  a.  Krit  1847.  H.  4.  and  TbeoL  Jahxbb.  184&  H.  1. 


CHAP.  y.    PBOTESTANTISM.    S  879l  MOBALS.  439 

be  attained.  The  reformers  endeavored,  by^  means  of  German  and  Latin 
popular  books  and  schools  on  an  ecclesiastical  basis,  to  educate  a  people  who 
conld  appreciate  and  act  upon  Protestant  principles,  (a)  In  consequence 
of  the  unwonted  freedom  proclaimed  at  the  Reformation,  it  must  be  con- 
ceded that  the  seeds  of  wild  passions  already  sown  were  made  suddenly  to 
spring  up.  By  the  prominence  given  to  original  sin,  in  comparison  with 
which  particular  temptations  and  sins  were  looked  upon  as  of  inferior  im- 
portance, the  moral  power  of  Protestantism  certainly  became  much  less  than 
we  should  have  expected  from  so  great  a  religious  revolution.  (//)  It  must 
also  be  remarked,  that  mere  orthodoxy  more  and  more  constantly  took  the 
place  of  a  living  faith ;  and  in  the  low  state  of  education  which  then  pre- 
vailed, there  was  great  danger  that  the  high  ground  taken  respecting  works, 
and  the  Calvinistic  doctrine  of  predestination,  would  lead  to  an  easy  kind  of 
reli^oos  practice.  It  is  true  that  Luther  at  one  time  spoke  of  Germany  as 
worse  than  Sodom,  and  mourned  that  he  spoke  the  German  language ;  Me- 
lancthon  deplored  that  all  the  waters  of  the  Elbe  were  not  enough  for  tears 
to  weep  over  the  unfortunate  dissensions  of  the  Reformation ;  and  the  re- 
formers generally,  in  view  of  these  evils,  gave  way  to  the  presentiment  that 
the  end  of  the  world  was  near.  It  should  be  remembered,  however,  that 
Luther  was  at  that  time  angry  that  the  Reformation  had  just  been  abused  to 
those  selfish  purposes  which  are  never  wanting  in  the  midst  of  such  revolu* 
tions ;  that  he  applied  to  his  age  the  same  rule  he  was  accustomed  to  use 
with  respect  to  his  own  heart,  and  in  his  monastic  confinement  looked  upon 
the  luxury  naturally  springing  from  the  increased  wealth  acquired  by  the 
middle  classes  on  the  discovery  of  America  as  a  crime ;  nor  should  we  for- 
get that  Melancthon  sometimes  shrunk  back  from  the  very  mental  conflicts 
which  had  been  conjured  up  by  his  own  power.  At  all  events,  it  was  not 
long  before  the  Church  took  upon  itself  the  work  of  controlling  public 
morals.  Among  the  Lutherans,  it  is  true,  this  was  attempted  without  any 
thorough  system  of  ecclesiastical  discipline,  but  by  means  of  exhortations, 
monitory  lectures,  and  excommunication,  not  unfrequently  mingled  with  much 
passion,  (c)  In  both  Churches  tliere  was  an  occasional  reference  to  the 
power  of  punishment  possessed  by  the  civil  authorities.  A  domestic  and 
ecclesiastical  system  of  morality  was  tlms  established,  of  so  rigid  a  character, 
that  when  compared  with  the  facility  possessed  in  the  Catholic  Church  of 
alternating  between  sinful  pleasures  and  penitential  exercises,  it  appeared  to 
have  produced,  in  connection  with  profound  religious  spirituality,  a  severe, 
sometimes  a  gloomy  and  a  restless  disposition.  Such  was  particularly  the 
case  in  the  French  and  Scotch  Churches,  and  an  extreme  form  of  it  was  de- 
veloped among  the  Puritans.  The  Sabbath  was  observed  with  scrupulous 
exactness,  and  many  things  before  regarded  as  discretionary  or  innocent  were 
DOW  treated  as  sins.    On  the  other  hand,  we  have  the  single  fact  of  the  big- 


a)  De  constitaendia  scholia  Luth.  liber,  pracc«dit  MeL  praefatia  Ua^.  1524.  ( Waich  voL  X.  in 
^)  P.  If.  ScAuUr,  Gesck  <L  kaWch.  Uvl.  Unterr.  unter.  d.  Prot  UaL  1802.  A.  ScAa^r,  de  I'in- 
flneoce  de  Lutb.  sur  I'education  du  pcuple.  Par.  1S.';8. 

h)  K.  Sarcerius,  v.  Jberlicber  VUtaUoD.  Eial.  1550.  4.    Comp.  EngeUiardt  in  Zeltocli.  £  List  Th. 

iao.u.1. 

e)  £.  g.  A,  MusctdM^  t.  plndrichtoD  HoMoteofeL  Fmkf.  (1556.)  1557. 


440  MODERN  CHTIBCH  HISTORY.    PER.  Y.    A.  D.  1617-1618. 

amy  of  the  Landgrave,  for  the  secret  consummation  of  which  Lather  and 
his  colleagues  granted  a  dispensation.  This  was  done  by  him  for  the  par- 
pose  of  avoiding  a  still  greater  evil,  and  was  justified  by  a  reference  to  the 
divine  dispensation  in  behalf  of  Abraham,  and  to  the  papal  license  given  to 
the  Count  of  Gleichen.  It  wns,  however,  done  with  too  little  care  for  the 
interests  of  the  Church,  and  proved  a  stumbling-block  which  was  harshly 
used  against  him,  and  was  even  abused  in  jmblic  for  justifying  a  barbarous 
polygamy.  (</)  No  divorces  were  allowed  except  for  adultery,  and  yet  by 
official  and  entire  separation  of  the  parties  they  prepared  the  way  for  further 
concessions,  (e)  The  approbation  which  the  reformers  gave  to  the  assassina- 
tion of  tyrants,  proceeded  in  Melancthon's  case  from  the  influence  of  his 
ecclesiastical  and  classical  studies,  and  in  Luther's  case  from  the  views  of 
right  which  prevailed  among  the  ancient  Germans,  and  a  manly  self- 
respect.  (/)  The  whole  fanciful  system  of  faith  in  magic  and  in  Satanic 
influences  remained  undisturbed  and  possibly  even  more  distinctly  prominent, 
in  consequence  of  the  poetic  manner  in  which  Luther  involuntarily  described 
his  conflicts  with  the  devil.  But  even  before  the  movements  connected  with 
the  Reformation  were  over,  important  efforts  were  made  to  construct  a  sci* 
entifio  system  of  ethics,  in  which  the  virtues  were  classified  in  the  usoal 
ancient  and  theological  form,  but  springing  out  of  a  justifying  faith.  The 
extreme  excitement  against  Osiander's  doctrines  (§  847)  was  in  the  Lutheran 
Church  especially  unfavorable  to  a  further  investigation  of  such  subjects,  (jji) 

§  876.    Law. 

The  reformers  maintained  merely  the  ordinary  view  of  law,  according  to 
which  the  power  of  the  state  was  entirely  separated  from  that  of  tie  Choroh, 
and  Luther  even  boasted  that  he  had  kept  them  from  being  peiiloualy  confound- 
ed, (a)  But  with  a  full  consciousness  of  the  result,  they  went  back  to  the  posi- 
tion of  the  apostolic  Church,  derived  the  whole  authority  of  all  ecclesiastical 
officers  from  the  local  churches,  and  would  allow  no  one  but  Grod,  (b)  and  least 
of  all  the  princes,  of  whom  Luther  had  a  very  poor  opinion,  (c)  to  have  do- 
minion over  souls.  In  the  constitution  of  the  Hessian  Church,  an  attempt 
was  made  to  form  an  equal  balance  between  the  independence  of  the  partioo- 
lar  congregations  and  the  unity  of  the  provincial  established  Church  (§  829). 
Luther  had  doubts  whether  any  artificial  legislation  could  form  a  people 
adapted  to  such  a  state  of  things,  (d)  His  favorite  idea  of  a  Church  was  not 
one  in  which  the  popular  element  was  highest,  but  one  in  which  every  indi- 
vidual was  looked  upon  as  moved  by  the  Uoly  Ghost,  (e)     But    in  one 

d)  De  W^U  T(i].  y.  p.  286sa.    C.  Ref.  vol  IIL  p.  849.    Ueppty  urk.  Beitrr.  z.  Oescb.  d.  I>opfMl- 
ebe  d.  Landgr.  (Zeitsch.  f.  hist  Tb.  1802.  U.  2.) 

0)  MerkwQrd.  Ebefall,  niitgeth.  v.  Schwan.  (Zeltacb.  £  tbQr.  Oeecb.  1853.  H.  2.) 

/)  Slr&btU  Mlficell.  vol.  I.  p.  170.     Vkert  vol.  II.  p.  46.     Walch  vol.  XXIL  p.  2151iu 

g)  VenaUyHus,  A  vlrL  chr.  1.  III.  Nor.  1629.    P,  «.  Eitten,  Ethlk.  Witt  1B71.    Coxnpt  PM  ia 

Stad.  u.  Krit  1848.  H.  2.    Schtean,  Ibid.  1860.  H.  1.    A.  Schxe^iaer,  IbW.  H.  \m. 

a)  Cor\f.  Aug.  II,  7.     Walch  vol  X.  p.  ^^AB^^SchwkO,  fl.  d.  nrapr.  Verb.  d.  K.  s.  Btaate  ^  d 

Qeblete  der.  ev.  Prot  (Stud.  u.  Krlt  1650.  H.  la.) 

li)  AH.  Smalc.  p.  8628.    /)«  WeUe  vol.  IV.  p.  10«.     Walch  vol.  X.  p.  462.  4«9. 

e)  Jhid.  p.  460.       d)  Schr.  an  d.  Landgrafen  In  RichUr,  KVerfl  (nt  /.)  p.  408. 
e)  Walch  vol  X.  p.  2718. 


OHAP.  Y.    PB0TE8TANTIS1L    |87«.LAW.    STAtL  .  441 

the  limitis  and  in  another  the  power  itself,  showed  that  in  actnal 
practice  both  views  were  impracticable  in  their  full  extent.    In  arranging 
the  powers  of  the  Church,  however,  Luther  alvyays  had  his  eye  exclusively 
upon  the  spiritual  interest.     In  the  empire,  the  Church  could  bo  represented 
only  by  the  imperial  states ;  and  in  the  hope  that  the  legal  bishops  would  at 
0ome  time  become  reconciled  to  the  Church,  the  superior  ecclesiastical  offices 
in  Germany  remained  vacant.    For  the  time  being,  therefore,  the  princes  and 
magistrates  from  love  to  the  Church  performed  the  functions  of  the  highest  ec- 
clesiastical offices  as  provisional  bishops,  though  with  the  counsel  of  distin- 
gnished  doctors  aud  the  aid  of  the  provincial  states.     Consistories,  composed 
of  civil  officers  and  clergy,  were  instituted  (after  1689)  principally  for  jurisdic- 
tion over  causes  connected  with  marriage,  excommunication,  and  processes  in 
which  clergymen  were  concerned.     The  government  of  each   provincial 
Church  gradually  fell  of  itself  into  their  hands,  responsible  only  to  the  civil 
aathorities,  so  that  the  actual  legal  system  became  directly  the  reverse  of  the 
kgal  principle  originally  proposed.  (/)    Even  then  Luther  had  cause  to  sigh 
over  the  bishopric  of  the  court,  without  any  spiritual  character,  and  some- 
times i>articular  divines,  when  oppressed,  reminded  the  princes  that  Christ 
had  not  delivered  his  people  from  papal  bondage  merely  to  make  them  slaves 
to  the  Politlei.  {fi)    But  the  actual  condition  of  things  was  soon  justified  on 
legal  principles  by  various  learned  men,  on  the  ground  that  it  was  a  transfer 
ot  the  episcopal  power  to  the  hands  of  orthodox  princes  by  virtue  of  the 
Religions  Peace  (Episcopal  system),  {h)    The  congregations  included  in  the 
district  of  each  imperial  state  constituted  a  distinct  provincial  Church.    And 
yet  from  their  opposition  to  the  Catholic  imperial  Church,  and  from  their 
pofloaooion  of  a  common  creed,  the  Protestant  states  even  after  the  dissolution 
of  the  Leagne  of  Smalkald,  regarded  themselves  especially  in  the  general  diet 
tB  a  angle  political  ecclesiastical  corporation,  and  the  provincial  churches, 
although  some  of  them  might  be  beyond  the  limits  of  the  empire,  were 
looked  upon  as  constituting  a  single  evangelical  Church,  joined  together  by 
mutual  sympathy  in  love  and  conflicts.    The  Reformed  Church  received  a 
republican  constitution  in  consequence  of  the  peculiar  mode  of  its  origin,  and 
^  country  in  which  it  was  formed.    Its  basis  consisted  of  a  system  of 
^yiJoda  composed  of  clergymen  and  elders,  in  a  regular  ascending  series  up 
to  the  highest  assembly.    This  system,  however,  was  never  fully  carried  out 
except  in  the  French  and  Scottish  churches,  and  even  in  them  the  co-optation 
^  the  elders  and  the  choice  of  the  ministers  were  necessary  through  the 
*^^er  synods,  the  congregations  having  only  the  right  of  a  rejection.    In 
"le  German  Reformed  churches  the  Presbyteries  gave  way  before  the  Con- 
'^'^ries  of  the  governments,  (/)  and  in  the  Lutheran  churches  of  the  Lower 

/)  Waich  p.  190«.    L,  Richter,  A  ev.  KOrdnungcn  des  1«.  Jobrh.  BrL  1846.  2  vols.  4.    Ihid, 
'^**-  <!.  ev.  KVcrf  in  Deut«chL  Lpa.  1651. 

it^  ^  ^'^^  ^«'-  "'•  P-  5^*-  *TiicuIty  Ht  Jena,  1661 :  SaUg  vol.  III.  p.  685.    Fac  at  Wlttenh. 
^*®*  CondL  The4>L  VlL  Frcf.  1664.  f.  P.  II.  i..  129. 

*)  ^.  SUphiini,  Tract  de  Jurlsd.  R<«t  (1609.)  162a  4.  £«p.  Carpzov. 

)  Tom  lo8  pynodes  nationanx  des  ^'gl.  ret  de  France,  par  A^n^on^  Ilaye.  1710.  8  vols.  4.  Ebrard, 
rj*- «».  mt«  Entwlckl.  d.  Presb.  Vert  d.  reC  K.  Frankr.  (Zeltach.  t  hist  Tb.  1849.  U.  2.)   A,  Of>m* 

^«  <l  acbott  Nationalk.  nacb  gegenw.  Vert  Hamb.  1844a.  S  vols.    Saek,  (pw  424.)    //.  v.  MUkUr, 


434  MODEKN  CllUIlCn  HISTORY.    PER.  V.    A-  D.  1517-1548. 

a  learned  jurist,  by  maintaining  that  the  Son  was  another  God  of  the  same 
nature,  hut  derived  from  the  Father.  He  saved  his  life  by  a  recantation,  an 
ecclesiastical  penance,  and  an  act  of  perjury  at  Geneva,  but  lost  it  at  Berne, 
as  ho  thougTit,  in  honor  of  tlie  Father  (156G).  (e)  David  Jorfs^  a  painter 
from  Delft,  who  had  before  been  highly  esteemed  as  a  prophet  in  the  new 
kingdom  at  Munster,  taught  that  the  Trinity  was  merely  a  revelation  of 
God  in  three  different  ages  of  the  world,  and  assembled  together  Anabap- 
tists of  all  kinds,  with  the  promise  that  they  should  take  possession  of  the 
earth  as  the  Israelites  did  of  Canaan  in  the  age  of  the  Holy  Spirit,  which  had 
made  its  appearance  in  him.  He  was  whipped  and  outlawed,  but  found  an 
honorable  asylum  under  an  assumed  name  at  Basle  (d.  1556).  (/)  Others 
took  refuge  in  Poland,  and  were  there  at  first  known  under  the  common 
name  of  Dissidents,  but  were,  after  1565,  expelled  from  the  Reformed  Church 
as  Unitarians,  They  were  not  entirely  free  from  persecution,  but  through 
the  favor  of  some  powerful  supporters  they  obtained  a  general  centre  for 
their  body  at  liacau  (1569).  {g)  In  Transylvania  a  public  recognition  of  the 
Unitarians  was  obtained  (1571)  by  the  influence  of  the  Piedmontese  Blan- 
drata^  the  private  physician  of  the  prince.  Jesus  was  honored  by  this  sect 
simply  as  a  man,  but  one  who  was  richly  endowed  by  God  and  exalted  for 
dominion  over  the  whole  world.  Adoration  was  paid  to  him  by  most  of 
them,  and  those  who  refused  this  were  persecuted.  (A) 

§  872.     Socinians. 

I.  Bibl.  fratrum  Polon.  Irenop.  (Amst)  1656.  8  vola.  f.  Ch.  Ortorodt,  Unterriehtong  r.  d. 
Ilftuptp.  fL  chr.  R.  Rak.  1604.  and  oft,  Catecb.  Racov.  (1609.  12.  and  oft,  Poln.  1605.)  ed.  O^der^ 
Frof.  1780.  Wi«»t>watiu*^  Bel.  rationalls.  1685.  Amst.  1708.  Stan,  Luli^niecii,  U.  reC  PoL 
Frelst  1685. 

II.  Btuldeu*,  de  orlg.  Socinian.  Jen.  1725.  4.  Ziegler.  Lchrbg.  d.  F.  S<>c.  {TJenlf,  N.  Mag.ToL 
IV.  p.  201RS.)  E.  Bengel,  Ideen  z.  Erkl.  d.  Soc.  Lehrbgr.  (Tub.  Mac.  St.  14?a.)  O.  Fock^  dcr  So- 
einianiflmas  in  der  Oesammtentw.  d.  cbristl.  Qelstes,  nacb  s.  blst  Verlanf.  u.  Lebrbegr.  Kiel  1841 
S  Abth. 

Laelius  Sochws^  belonging  to  the  noble  family  of  the  Sozini  of  Siena, 
spent  his  time,  after  1547,  in  reformed  countries  in  the  character  of  an 
inquiring  but  sceptical  man  of  letters,  under  the  advice  and  toleration  of  the 
reformers,  and  highly  esteemed  for  his  honesty  and  intelligence  (d.  15G2).  (a) 
It  was  by  his  nephew  and  heir,  Fausttis  Socinm  (d.  1604),  that  the  Unitarians 
in  Poland,  with  whom  he  became  connected,  became  organized  as  a  commn- 


e)  B.  Arftitu,  Val.  Gentllls  Jnsto  capitis  snppUclo  afTecti  II.  Gen.  1567.  4.  Gent  impietatnin  ex- 
plicatio  e.vactis  Senatas  Gene  v.  c.  pracf.  Th.  Beucie^  Ocn.  1567.  i. 

/)  T  Wonderhoek,  1542.  4. 15».  C— Hist  Dav.  JovIb  d  Erzketzen,  durch  d.  Univ.  Basel  B«l 
1559.  4.  II.  vitae  Dav.  Geoi^i  haeresiarchae,  conscr.  ab  ipsiiu  genera,  Kic  Bte^dikic^  ed.  Ji  lU" 
tiuft^  Davontr.  1642.  12     Jensfnius^  aufgedcckto  Larve  Dav.  GeorgiL  Kiel.  1670.  4. 

g)  Catechesis  et  ConC  fldei  coetus  per  Pol.  congregaU  in  nomine  J.  C.  Cracov.  1574  12.  known  as 
the  1.  Kacovian  Catccbism. 

h)  Blanir.  Cont  Antltr.  c.  roftitatlone  FlacU^  ed.  Htnke^  tilmst  17W.  (Opp.  aead.  p.  «45.) 
lltberU,  a.  d.  Ix^bren  v.  Bland.  (T&b.  Zeitacbr.  1840.  II.  4.)— Samtna  nniv.  'lli.  chr.  sec  UniUrloa 
Claudlop.  17S7.    (RoMnmiOUr,  in  Staudltn's  u.  Tzscb.  Archiv.  f.  KGeach.  vol  L  U.  1.) 

a)  Ch.  F.  lUgfn,  Yita  L.  Soclni.  Lps.  1814.  Symbolao  ad  vlt.  et  doct  L.  &  ilL  Lpo.  8  P. 
1826-14.  4.  Orelli,  L.  Soc.  (Basl.  wias.  Zeitscbr.  1824.  vol.  II.  P.  a  p  llSaa.)  /*.  Tr^Kuel^  LeHo 
Boxini  u.  die  Antitrinitarier  sr.  Zcit  Heidelh.  1844. 


CHAP.  IV.    ULTRAI6T8.    1 8T2.  S0CINIAN9.    1 87a  SCnWKNCKFELD.        435 

nity,  and  received  a  complete  system  of  doctrine,  (b)  The  principal  article 
of  tbis  was  an  attempt  at  an  accommodation  between  different  parties  by  the 
doctrine,  that  although  Jesus  was  born  a  mere  man,  he  was  nevertheless 
without  any  earthly  father,  and  was  wonderfully  endowed  by  God,  was 
taken  up  into  heaven,  and  as  the  reward  of  his  life  was  deified,  that  he 
might  bo  a  mediator,  to  bring  man,  alienated  from  God  by  sin,  to  the  knowl- 
edge and  grace  of  God,  and  that  he  might  reign  as  the  king  of  his  people  in 
all  periods  of  time.  As  man  is  destitute  of  any  natural  knowledge  of  God, 
divine  revelation  is  made  to  correspond  with  the  laws  of  his  mind.  Tlie 
Socinian  explanations  of  the  New  Testament  were  therefore  frequently  of  a' 
bold  and  novel  character,  but  conformed  to  the  prejudices  of  a  limited  un- 
derstanding, and  the  ethical  system  adopted  was  more  of  a  social  than  of  a 
rehgious  nature.  Christianity  was  viewed  on  the  whole  as  a  moral  redemp- 
tion by  our  own  efforts.  The  connection  with  the  Anabaptists,  which  Socinus 
found  already  formed,  was  very  soon  broken  off.  Socinianism  was  the  extreme 
of  opposition  to  popery,  and  was  never  a  true  pulsation,  but  the  feverish  ex- 
citement of  the  Pi'otestant  Church  when  it  was  sinking  into  a  chill  ortho- 
doxy. Its  advocates  were  never  regarded  by  the  Protestants  as  Christians, 
and  it  was  only  in  Altorf,  near  tlie  commencement  of  the  seventeenth  cen- 
tury, that  they  succeeded  in  forming  an  organized  party.  Even  this  was 
soon  suppressed.  A  few  literary  men,  especially  among  the  Arminians,  have 
been  obliged  to  defend  themselves  against  the  reproach  of  Socinianism.  (c) 
In  Poland,  the  attack  upon  Protestantism  was  most  ferocious  against  the  So- 
cinians.  In  1638  they  lost  possession  of  Hacau,  where  the  Polish  nobility 
had  been  educated,  and  in  1658  they  were  entirely  exterminated  under  the 
ostensible  charge  of  being  traitors  to  the  government,  (d)  The  exiled  con- 
gregations found  refuge  under  the  great  Elector,  and  individuals  took  up  their 
residence  in  the  Netherlands,  but  the  proper  time  for  Socinianism  as  a  sect 
was  DOW  past. 

§  373.     Caspar  ScJixcencJcfcld  of  Omng,     Sebastian  Francl:. 

For  lib  wrttlIl«^  tee  Walck,  Bibl.  Uieol.  Th.  IL  pi  CT.-a.  Kurze  Leben'^b.  Schw.  without  place.  1€97. 
Htst  Nachr.  v.  Schw.  «ariit  Anzalil  sr.  Scbrr.  Prcn/.L  1744.  Dio  wesentL  Lchro  des  Ilcrrn  C  Scbw. 
o.  sr.  01aabenH(reni*85on.  Ur»1. 17Td.  {Jdhne)  Dankb.  Krin.  an  dL  Scbwenkfeldcr  za  Philadelphia.  GOrL 
1816i — Wigand,^^  Schwcnkfeldianlsmo.  Lps.  15S6.  4.  Erbkam^  p.  Zhl^»,—Franck:  Taradoxa  280 
<L  L  Wanderred.  aus  d.  IL  8.  (Ulm.  1534.)  4.  Baain  d.  Wise.  Gutea  u.  Btiees.  Ulm.  1534.  4.  DIo 
Oaldin  Arab.  Au^b^  l&3a  t  Daa  vcrbathschiert  mit  tWten  i>igeln  verscblossno  Biich.  (Ibid.)  1589. 
t—S.  Tk,  Wald,  de  vita  acriptls  ct  t^y^i.  inyst  S.  Francl.  ErL  1793.  4.  K.  am  Ende,  kU-ine  Kachloae 
xn  d.  onvoll»t  Nachrr.  v.  S.  Fr.  Nnrnb.  1796.  4.  nilt  2.  Forts.*.  179S-99.  rragen  voL  III.  p.  314afli 
Xrhkam^  pi  iSOtf.    C.  T.  Kaim,  ±  KeC  d.  Beicbsst  Ulm.  Stuttg.  1851.  p.  269!& 

As  the  Reformation  found  salvation  only  in  the  Scriptures  but  by  means 
of  a  true  and  saving  faith,  the  latter,  when  it  was  especially  ardent,  some- 
times rose  against  the  narrowness  and  uncertainty  of  all  merely  external 


h)  Opp.  Irenop.  165«.  2  vols,  t  {PrtypcKtvim)  Vita  F.  8.  168ft.  4.  before  0pp.  8oc.  u.  BIbL  tnX. 
Pulonorum.    Soulmin^  Mem.  of  the  Life  of  F.  8.  Lond.  1777. 

c)  Itdmhach,  ElnL  In  d.  K.  Strolt  d.  ev.  K.  uiit  d.  Soc  Cob.  1758.  2  vols.  4.    Zeltfur,  U.  Crypto- 
Sodobmi  AltorflnaA  Acad.  infestL  Lps.  1729.  2  vols.  4. 

d)  PrwlitioDes  Arianorum  patriae  suae  sub  tempos  belli  SaedcL  1657.  4.    On  the  other  aide :  £«- 
bienitcU  Memoriale  in  causa  Fratrom  Unltar.  StetinL  1659. 


434  MODERN  CHURCn  HISTORY.    PER.  V.    A.  D.  151T-ld48b 

a  learned  jurist,  by  maintaining  that  the  Son  was  another  God  of  the  same 
nature,  but  derived  from  the  Fatlier.  He  saved  his  life  by  a  recantation,  an 
ecclesiastical  penance,  and  an  act  of  perjury  at  Geneva,  but  lost  it  at  Berne, 
as  ho  thoug?it,  in  honor  of  tlie  Father  (1560).  (<?)  David  Joris^  a  painter 
from  Delft,  who  liad  before  been  highly  esteemed  as  a  prophet  in  the  new 
kingdom  at  Munster,  taught  that  the  Trinity  was  merely  a  revelation  of 
God  in  three  different  ages  of  the  world,  and  assembled  together  Anabap- 
tists of  all  kinds,  with  the  promise  that  they  should  take  possession  of  the 
earth  as  the  Israelites  did  of  Canaan  in  the  ago  of  the  Holy  Spirit,  which  had 
made  its  appearance  in  him.  He  was  whipped  and  outlawed,  but  found  an 
honorable  asylum  under  an  assumed  name  at  Basle  (d.  1556).  (f)  Others 
took  refuge  in  Poland,  and  were  there  at  first  known  under  the  common 
name  of  Dissidents,  but  were,  after  1565,  expelled  from  the  Reformed  Church 
as  Unitarians,  They  were  not  entirely  free  from  persecution,  but  through 
the  favor  of  some  powerful  supporters  they  obtained  a  general  centre  for 
their  body  at  Racau  (1569).  (g)  In  Transylvania  a  public  recognition  of  the 
Unitarians  was  obtained  (1571)  by  the  influence  of  the  Piedmonteso  Blan- 
drata^  the  private  physician  of  the  prince.  Jesus  was  honored  by  this  sect 
simply  as  a  man,  but  one  who  was  richly  endowed  by  God  and  exalted  for 
dominion  over  the  whole  world.  Adoration  was  paid  to  him  by  most  of 
them,  and  those  who  refused  this  were  persecuted.  (A) 

§  872.     Socinians. 

L  BIbl.  fratrurn  Polon.  Irenop.  (Amst)  1656.  8  vols.  f.  Ck.  OnAorodi,  Unterriditung  r.  d. 
ITanptp.  d.  chr.  R.  Rak.  1604.  and  oft,  Catech.  Racov.  (1609.  12.  and  oft.  Poln.  1605.)  ed.  0«d«r^ 
Frcf.  1789.  Wig9owatim,  Bel.  raUonalia.  16S5.  Amst.  ITOa  SUtn.  LuhUniecii,  11.  ret  Pol 
Frelst  1685. 

II.  Buddewt,  de  orlg.  Soclnlan.  Jen.  1725.  4.  Ziegler.  Lehrbg.  d.  F.  S<»o.  {Ilenlf,  N.  Mag.  roL 
IV.  p.  201  w.)  E.  BengeK  Meen  i.  Erkl.  d.  Soc.  Lehrbgr.  (Tub.  Mae.  St.  14m  )  O.  Ft>ct,  der  So- 
einianifloius  in  der  Oesammtentw.  d.  cbriatl.  Oelstes,  nacb  a.  bist  Verluuf.  u.  Lfbrb«^.  Kiel  ISIt 
SAbth. 

Laelim  Socimis^  belonging  to  the  noble  family  of  the  Sozini  of  Siena, 
spent  his  time,  after  1547,  in  reformed  countries  in  the  character  of  an 
inquiring  but  sceptical  man  of  letters,  under  the  advice  and  toleration  of  the 
reformers,  and  highly  esteemed  for  his  honesty  and  intelligence  (d.  15G2).  (a) 
It  was  by  his  nephew  and  heir,  Fauatus  Soeinvs  (d.  1604),  that  the  Unitarians 
in  Poland,  with  whom  he  became  connected,  became  organized  as  a  comma- 


e)  B.  ArHluM,  Val.  Gentllis  Jnsto  capitis  sapplicio  afTecti  H.  Gen.  1567.  4.  Gent  impietttiun  ex- 
plicatio  e.xactis  Senatus  Oenev.  c.  praof.  Th,  B^mae^  Gen.  1667.  4. 

/)  rWondtrbMk,  1542,  4. 15W.  C— Hist  Dav.  Jovis  d.  Erzketzers,  durch  d.  Unlr.  BaaeL  B«l 
1559.  4.  II.  vitae  Dav.  Geoi^i  liacresiarchac,  conscr.  ab  ipsius  genera,  Kic  Bte^diJbio^  ed.  «/!  iSe- 
r/u«,  Pavcntr.  1642.  12     Jetseniun^  aufgedeckte  Larve  Dav.  GeorglL  Kiel  1670.  4. 

g)  Catcchesls  et  Conf.  fldci  coctus  per  Pol.  congregaU  in  nooaine  J.  C.  CracoT.  1574  13.  known  as 
the  1.  Kacovian  Catechism. 

h)  Blan  ir.  Cent  AnUtr.  c.  reftitatione  Flacit,  ed.  Jlenke,  tilmst  1794.  (Opp.  aced.  p.  M5.) 
IfeberU'^  a.  d.  Lehren  v.  Bland.  (Tub.  Zeitachr.  1840.  II.  4.) — Samma  nniv.  Ih.  chr.  see.  Unitarioe 
Claudiop.  17S7.    {RowntnulUr,  in  Staadlln's  a.  Tzsch.  Archlv.  t  KGeseh.  vol  L  IL  1.) 

a)  Ch.  F.  lUgen,  Vita  L.  8«»cinL  Lps.  1814  Symboloe  ad  vlt.  et  doct  L.  a  III  Lpo.  8  p. 
1826-44.  4.  Orelli,  L.  Soc.  (Basil,  wisa.  Zeltschr.  1824.  vol.  II.  P.  a  p  llSaa.)  F.  Tr^fUel^  LeHo 
Boiini  XX.  dio  Antitrinitarier  sr.  Zcit.  Ueidelh.  1844. 


CHAP.  IT.    ULTRAI6TS.    $  «72.  SOCINIANS.    %  919.  SCHWENCKFELD.       435 

nity,  and  received  a  complete  system  of  doctrine,  (ft)  Tlie  principal  article 
of  this  was  an  attempt  at  an  accommodation  between  different  parties  by  the 
doctrine,  that  although  Jesus  was  born  a  mere  man,  he  was  nevertheless 
without  any  earthly  father,  and  was  wonderfully  endowed  by  God,  was 
taken  up  into  heaven,  and  as  the  reward  of  his  life  was  deified,  that  he 
might  bo  a  mediator,  to  bring  man,  alienated  from  God  by  sin,  to  the  knowl- 
edge and  grace  of  God,  and  that  he  might  reign  as  the  king  of  his  people  in 
all  periods  of  time.  As  man  is  destitute  of  any  natural  knowledge  of  God, 
divine  revelation  is  made  to  correspond  with  the  laws  of  his  mind.  Tlie 
Socinian  explanations  of  the  New  Testament  were  therefore  frequently  of  a' 
bold  and  novel  character,  but  conformed  to  the  prejudices  of  a  limited  un- 
derstanding, and  the  ethical  system  adopted  was  more  of  a  social  than  of  a 
religious  nature.  Christianity  was  viewed  on  the  whole  as  a  moral  redemp- 
tion by  our  own  efforts.  Tlie  connection  with  the  Anabaptists,  which  Socinus 
found  already  formed,  was  very  soon  broken  off.  Socinianism  was  the  extreme 
of  opposition  to  popery,  and  was  never  a  true  pulsation,  but  the  feverish  ex- 
citement of  the  Protestant  Church  when  it  was  sinking  into  a  chill  ortho- 
doxy. Its  advocates  were  never  regarded  by  the  Protestants  as  Christians, 
and  it  was  only  in  Altorf,  near  the  commencement  of  the  seventeenth  cen- 
tury, that  they  succeeded  in  forming  an  organized  party.  Even  this  was 
soon  suppressed.  A  few  literary  men,  especially  among  the  Arminians,  have 
been  obliged  to  defend  themselves  against  the  reproach  of  Socinianism.  (e) 
In  Poland,  the  attack  upon  Protestantism  was  most  ferocious  against  the  So- 
cinians.  In  1638  they  lost  possession  of  Racau,  where  the  Polish  nobility 
had  been  educated,  and  in  1668  they  were  entirely  exterminated  under  the 
ostensible  charge  of  being  traitors  to  the  government.  (<Z)  The  exiled  con- 
gregations found  refuge  under  the  great  Elector,  and  individuals  took  up  their 
residence  in  the  Netherlands,  but  the  proper  time  for  Socinianism  as  a  sect 
was  DOW  past. 

§  373.     Cattpar  Schtcenckfeld  of  Omng.     Sebastian  Franc?.'. 

ForhU  wI1tin«^  see  Walch,  Bibl.  Uieol.  Th.  IL  pi  nr.ss.  Kuree  Lcbensb.  Schw.  without  plice.  1697. 
Hi<t  Nachr.  v.  6chw.  sanit  Anzahl  «r.  ^cbrr.  PrcnzL  1744.  Die  weseotl  Lchro  des  Herrn  C  Scbw. 
a.  N*.  OUoben8genits!H>n.  Ur»I.  ITTd.  {JdAne)  Dankb.  Erin,  an  d.  Schwenkfelder  za  Philadelphia.  GOrL 
191«t — Wlgatuf,  d«  Schwenkfeldianismo.  Lps.  1586.  4.  Erbkam^  p.  2i>li^—Franck:  I^aradoxa  280 
d.  L  Wanderred.  aus  d.  H.  8.  (Ulm.  1534.)  4.  Baam  d.  Wise.  Outca  il  B<«es.  Ultn.  15U4.  4.  DIo 
OaMia  Arch.  Augsbi  153S.  t  I>aa  vcrbuthschiert  init  Mbon  Sigoln  verscbluasne  Bnch.  (Ibid.)  1589L 
£ — S.  Tk.  WaM,  de  vita  »crlpti«  et  pjst  inyst.  S.  Francl.  ErL  1793.  4  K.  am  Ende»  kUino  Nacbloac 
za  <L  nnvoltst  Nachrr.  v.  8.  Fr.  Nfirnb.  1796.  4.  mit  2.  Forta^  179S-99.  Ilaffen  vol  III.  p.  814ea. 
J^rbkam,  p^  «S6a.    C.  T.  Kaim,  d.  Itet  d.  Beicbast  Ulm.  Stattg.  1651.  p.  209sa. 

As  the  Reformation  found  salvation  only  in  the  Scriptures  but  by  means 
af  a  true  and  saving  faith,  the  latter,  when  it  was  especially  ardent,  some- 
times rose  against  the  narrowness  and  uncertainty  of  all  merely  external 


e*)  Opp.  Irenop.  1656.  2  vols,  t  (Prxypcovim)  Vita  F.  8.  1686.  4  before  0pp.  Boc.  u,  Bibl.  tnt 
Ptflonornm.    Soulmin^  Mem.  of  the  Life  of  F.  8.  Lond.  1777. 

c)  Ramhachy  ElnL  In  d.  R.  Streit  d.  ev.  K.  mlt  d.  Soc  Cob.  1758.  2  vola.  4    Zeltner,  II.  Crypto- 
Sodoismi  AltorfliUM  Acad.  InfestL  Lps.  1729.  2  vols.  4. 

d)  Proditiones  Arianorum  patrUe  suae  sub  tempos  belli  SaecicL  1657.  4    On  the  other  aide:  Z«> 
^^^nf4»frfi  Memoriale  in  causa  Fratram  Unitar.  Stetinl.  1659. 


434  MODERN  CHURCH  niSTORT.    PER.  V.    A.  D.  1517-l«a 

a  learned  jurist,  by  mftintaining  that  the  Son  was  another  God  of  the  same 
nature,  but  derived  from  the  Father.  He  saved  his  life  by  a  recantation,  an 
ecclesiastical  penance,  and  an  act  of  perjury  at  Geneva,  but  lost  it  at  Berne, 
as  ho  thougTit^  in  honor  of  the  Father  (156G).  (e)  David  Joris^  a  painter 
from  Delft,  who  had  before  been  highly  esteemed  as  a  prophet  in  the  now 
kingdom  at  Munster,  taught  that  the  Trinity  was  merely  a  revelation  of 
God  in  three  different  ages  of  the  world,  and  assembled  together  Anabap- 
tists of  all  kinds,  with  the  promise  that  they  should  take  possession  of  the 
earth  as  the  Israelites  did  of  Canaan  in  the  age  of  the  Holy  Spirit,  which  had 
made  its  appearance  in  him.  He  was  whipped  and  outlawed,  but  found  an 
honorable  asylum  under  an  assumed  name  at  Basle  (d.  1556).  (/)  Others 
took  refuge  in  Poland,  and  were  there  at  first  known  under  the  common 
name  of  Dissidents,  but  were,  after  1565,  expelled  from  the  Reformed  Church 
as  Unitarians,  They  were  not  entirely  free  from  persecution,  but  through 
the  favor  of  some  powerful  supporters  they  obtained  a  general  centre  for 
their  body  at  Rncau  (1569).  (g)  In  Transylvania  a  public  recognition  of  the 
Unitarians  was  obtained  (1571)  by  the  influence  of  the  Piedmontese  Blan^ 
drata^  the  private  physician  of  the  prince.  Jesus  was  honored  by  this  sect 
simply  as  a  man,  but  one  who  was  richly  endowed  by  God  and  exalted  for 
dominion  over  the  whole  world.  Adoration  was  paid  to  him  by  most  of 
them,  and  those  who  refused  this  were  persecuted.  (A) 

§  872.     Socinians, 

L  Blbl.  fratrurn  Polon.  Ironop.  (Amftt)  1656.  8  vols.  f.  CK  Oatorodl,  Unterrichtung  t.  d. 
Tlftuptp.  d  chr.  K.  Rak.  1604  and  oft  Catech.  Racov.  (1609.  12.  and  oft,  Poln.  1605.)  ed.  Oeder, 
Frcf.  178Q.  Wigsowatiue,  Eel.  raUonalls.  1685.  Amst.  1708.  SUin.  LulUniecii,  II.  reC  Pol 
FrelPt  IC95. 

II.  JiuddetM,  de  orlg.  Soclnlan.  Jen.  1725.  4.  Ziegler.  Lchrbg.  d.  F.  S<k?.  {flenl'^,  N.  Mag.  t»L 
IV.  p.  201m.)  £.  Bengel,  Ideen  i.  Erkl.  d.  See.  Lchrbgr.  (Tub.  Mae.  Sr.  14?8^  O.  Fock^  der  8o- 
einianlAmus  in  der  Qmammtentw.  d.  cbristl.  Gelstes,  nach  a.  hi.st  Verlauf.  u.  Lehrl^egr.  Kiel  1841 
2  Abth. 

Laeliu8  Socinvs,  belonging  to  the  noble  family  of  the  Sozini  of  Siena, 
spent  his  time,  after  1547,  in  reformed  countries  in  the  character  of  an 
inquiring  but  sceptical  man  of  letters,  under  the  advice  and  toleration  of  the 
reformers,  and  highly  esteemed  for  his  honesty  and  intelligence  (d.  1562).  (a) 
It  was  by  his  nephew  and  heir,  Fauafus  Socinvs  (d.  1604),  that  the  Unitarians 
in  Poland,  with  whom  he  became  connected,  became  organized  as  a  commn- 


e)  B.  Aretiu9y  Yal.  GendUs  Jnsto  capitis  snpplicio  afTec:!  II.  Gen.  1567.  4.  Gent  Impietttam  «x> 
plicatio  exactis  Senatas  Genev.  c.  praof.  Th.  Rimte^  Gen.  1567.  4. 

/)  T  H'ondtrboek^  1542.  4. 1555.  f — Hist  Dav.  Jovla  d.  Erxketzers,  dnrch  d.  Univ.  BaaeL  Baa 
1509.  4.  II.  vitac  Dav.  Georgii  hacresiarcbac,  conscr.  ab  ipslas  gcnero,  Xic.  Bletdikio^  ed.  J.  R^ 
Tius^  Paventr.  1642.  12     JeAsenimi,  aufgedockte  Larve  Dav.  GeorgIL  Kiel.  1670.  4. 

g)  Catecliesis  et  Conf.  fldci  coetua  per  Pol.  congregaU  in  nomine  J.  C.  Cracor.  1574  12.  known  m 
the  1.  Uaoovian  Catccliisni. 

h)  Blan  1r.  Conf.  AnUtr.  c.  reftatatione  Flacii^  ed-  I/entf^  tilmst  17M.  (0pp.  acad.  p.  %4&.) 
Hebtrlf^  a.  d.  Lchren  v.  Bland.  (T&b.  Zeitachr.  1840.  II.  4.) — Snmma  univ.  'lb.  chr.  aec  Unltarloo 
Claudiop.  17S7.    (RmenmiUUr^  in  Staudlin's  n.  Tzach.  Archlv.  t  KGeach.  vol  L  H.  1.) 

a)  Ch.  F.  lUgtn,  Vite  L.  8«>cinL  Lps.  1814.  Symbolae  ad  vit.  et  doct  L  8.  IIL  Lpa  S  P. 
1826-44.  4.  OrtUi,  L.  Soc.  (Basl.  wiaa.  Zeitachr.  1824.  vol.  II.  P.  a  p  llSse.)  F.  Tr^h»el^  LeMo 
Bosini  XL  die  Antitrinitarier  ar.  Zcit  Ueidelb.  1844. 


CHAP.  IV.    ULTRAI8TS.    $  «72.  S0CINIAN8.    $  «7a  SCHWENCKFELD.       435 

nity,  and  received  a  complete  system  of  doctrine,  (ft)  Tlio  principal  article 
of  this  was  an  attempt  at  an  accommodation  between  different  parties  by  the 
doctrine,  that  although  Jesus  was  born  a  mere  man,  he  was  nevertheless 
without  any  earthly  father,  and  was  wonderfully  endowed  by  God,  was 
taken  up  into  heaven,  and  as  the  reward  of  his  life  was  deified,  that  he 
might  bo  a  mediator,  to  bring  man,  alienated  from  God  by  sin,  to  the  knowl- 
edge and  grace  of  God,  and  that  he  might  reign  as  the  king  of  his  people  in 
all  periods  of  time.  As  man  is  destitute  of  any  natural  knowledge  of  God, 
divine  revelation  is  made  to  correspond  with  the  laws  of  his  mind.  Tlie 
Socinian  explanations  of  the  New  Testament  were  therefore  frequently  of  a' 
bold  and  novel  character,  but  conformed  to  the  prejudices  of  a  limited  un- 
derstanding, and  the  ethical  system  adopted  was  more  of  a  social  than  of  a 
religious  nature.  Christianity  was  viewed  on  the  whole  as  a  moral  redemp- 
tion by  our  own  efforts.  The  connection  with  the  Anabaptists,  which  Socinus 
fbund  already  formed,  was  very  soon  broken  off.  Socinianism  was  the  extreme 
of  opposition  to  popery,  and  was  never  a  true  pulsation,  but  the  feverish  ex- 
citement of  the  Protestant  Church  when  it  was  sinking  into  a  chill  ortho- 
doxy. Its  advocates  were  never  regarded  by  the  Protestants  as  Christiana, 
and  it  was  only  in  Altorf,  near  the  commencement  of  the  seventeenth  cen- 
tury, that  they  succeeded  in  forming  an  organized  party.  Even  this  was 
soon  suppressed.  A  few  Uterary  men,  especially  among  the  Arminians,  have 
been  obliged  to  defend  themselves  against  the  reproach  of  Socinianism.  (e) 
In  Poland,  the  attack  upon  Protestantism  was  most  ferocious  against  the  So- 
cinians.  In  1638  they  lost  possession  of  Racau,  where  the  Polish  nobility 
had  been  educated,  and  in  1668  they  were  entirely  exterminated  under  the 
ostensible  charge  of  being  traitors  to  the  government.  {(T)  The  exiled  con- 
gregations found  refuge  under  the  great  Elector,  and  individuals  took  up  their 
residence  in  the  Netherlands,  but  the  proper  time  for  Socinianism  as  a  sect 
was  now  past. 

§  373.     Caspar  Schicencl'feld  of  Os»ing,    Sebastian  Francl: 

For  his  writiniips  see  WalcK,  Bibl.  theol.  Tli.  IL  pi  &'s&.  Kurze  Lcben.ob.  Schw.  without  place.  1607. 
Hist  Nacbr.  v.  6chw.  saint  Anzaiil  sr.  bclirr.  PrcnzL  1744.  Die  wescntl.  Lehre  des  Herrn  C  8chir. 
a.  »r.  GUubeoi>geno&!ion.  lir»l.  ITTd.  {JdKne)  Dankb.  Erin,  an  d.  Schwonkfelder  zu  rhila<Ielphla.  GOrL 
18Ht — 1f/{7ci»M/,  de  Schwenkfeldlaniamo.  Lps.  15S6.  4.  Erbkam^  p.  ^It^—Franvk :  J^araduxa  280 
d.  L  Wunderred.  aus  d.  IL  8.  (Ulm.  1584.)  4.  Bauin  d.  Wiw.  Outes  n.  Biisea.  Ulm.  1^34.  4.  Dlo 
OaMia  Arch.  Au^b.  1533.  t  Das  vcrbaUiachiert  init  Mbcn  i^igoln  verschlossne  Bnch.  (Ibid.)  1589L 
£ — S,  Th.  WaM^  do  vita  »crlptl»  ct  syst.  inyst.  S.  Franci.  KrL  1793.  4  K.  am  Ende,  kitlne  Nacbleao 
xa  <L  anvollst  Naclirr.  v.  9.  Fr.  Nornb.  1796.  4.  ndt  2.  Forta.^.  179!^99.  ITagen  vol  III.  p.  814ea. 
Jgrbkam,  p^  SSCsa.    C.  T.  Kaim,  d.  Eet  d.  Beiebsat.  Ulm.  Stuttg.  1651.  p.  209s8. 

As  the  Reformation  found  salvation  only  in  the  Scriptures  but  by  means 
of  a  true  and  saving  faith,  the  latter,  when  it  was  especially  ardent,  some- 
times rose  against  the  narrowne^  and  uncertainty  of  all  merely  external 


b)  Opi).  Irenop.  1656u  2  vols,  t  {Prtypcovim)  Vita  F.  S.  1686.  4.  beforo  0pp.  Boc  u.  Blbl.  tnt, 
P(/lonorum.    SoulmitL,  Mem.  of  the  Life  of  F.  9.  Lond.  1777. 

c)  Rambach,  EinL  in  d.  K.  Strelt  d.  ev.  K.  mit  (L  Soc  Cob.  1758.  2  vola.  4.    Zeltntr,  II.  Crypto- 
Sodoismi  Altorfloaf)  Acad.  Infestl.  Lps.  1729.  2  vols.  4. 

d)  ProiUtiones  Arianoram  patriae  suae  sub  tcmpus  belli  SaedcL  1657.  4.    On  the  other  aide :  Z«> 
^ietUeeii  Memoriale  in  causa  Fratnim  Unitar.  StetioL  1650. 


434  MODEEN  CHURCH  niSTORT.    PER.  V.    A.  D.  1517-l«a 

a  learned  jurist,  by  maintaining  that  the  Son  was  another  God  of  the  same 
nature,  but  derived  from  the  Father.  He  saved  his  life  by  a  recantation,  an 
ecclesiastical  penance,  and  an  act  of  perjury  at  Geneva,  but  lost  it  at  Berne, 
as  ho  thought,  in  honor  of  the  Father  (156G).  (e)  David  Joris^  a  painter 
from  Delft,  who  had  before  been  highly  esteemed  as  a  prophet  in  the  new 
kingdom  at  Munster,  taught  that  the  Trinity  was  merely  a  revelation  of 
God  in  three  different  ages  of  the  world,  and  assembled  together  Anabap- 
tists  of  all  kinds,  with  the  promise  that  they  should  take  possession  of  the 
earth  as  the  Israelites  did  of  Canaan  in  the  age  of  the  Holy  Spirit,  which  had 
made  its  appearance  in  him.  He  was  whipped  and  outlawed,  but  found  an 
honorable  asylum  under  an  assumed  name  at  Basle  (d.  1556).  (/)  Others 
took  refuge  in  Poland,  and  were  there  at  first  known  under  the  common 
name  of  Dissidents,  but  were,  after  1565,  expelled  from  the  Reformed  Church 
as  Unitarians.  They  were  not  entirely  free  from  persecution,  but  through 
the  favor  of  some  powerful  supporters  they  obtained  a  general  centre  for 
their  body  at  Rncau  (1569).  {g)  In  Transylvania  a  public  recognition  of  the 
Unitarians  was  obtained  (1571)  by  the  influence  of  the  Piedmontese  Blan' 
drata^  the  private  physician  of  the  prince.  Jesus  was  honored  by  this  sect 
simply  as  a  man,  but  one  who  was  richly  endowed  by  God  and  exalted  for 
dominion  over  the  whole  world.  Adoration  was  paid  to  him  by  most  of 
them,  and  those  who  refused  this  were  persecuted.  (A) 

§  872.     Sociniana. 

I.  Blbl.  fratrurn  Polon.  Ironop.  (Amst)  1658.  8  vols.  f.  Ck.  Ontorodt,  Unterricbtung  t.  d. 
Tlftuptp.  d  clir.  K.  Rak.  1604.  and  oft  Catech.  Racov.  (1609.  12.  and  oft.  Ptiln.  16(V5.)  ed.  (kdtr^ 
Frcf.  1780.  WiMotpatius,  Rel.  raUonalis.  1685.  Amst.  1708.  SUin,  Lulienifcii,  U.  nt  PoL 
Frelpt  1 085. 

II.  Buddeus,  de  orig.  Soclnlan.  Jen.  1725.  4.  Zifgler.  Lcbrbg.  d.  F.  S<k;.  {Henl-^,  N.  Mag:  vol 
IV.  p.  201m,)  K  Bengel  Ideen  i.  Erkl.  d.  Soc,  Lehrbgr.  (Tub.  Maff.  St.  U^8^  O.  FttcJk,  d«T  So- 
etniaiiiflmuB  in  der  GeMimintentw.  d.  cbristl.  Qel«te9,  nach  a.  bist  Verluuf.  u.  I^brl^egr.  Kiel  1841 
2  Abth. 

Laelitu  Socinvs^  belonging  to  the  noble  family  of  the  Sozini  of  Siena, 
spent  his  time,  after  1547,  in  reformed  countries  in  the  character  of  an 
inquiring  but  sceptical  man  of  letters,  under  the  advice  and  toleration  of  the 
reformers,  and  highly  esteemed  for  his  honesty  and  intelligence  (d.  1562).  (a) 
It  was  by  his  nephew  and  heir,  Faustus  Socinvs  (d.  1604),  that  the  Unitariaos 
in  Poland,  with  whom  he  became  connected,  became  organized  as  a  commn- 


e)  li.  Aretiua^  Val.  Gentllis  Jnsto  capitis  supplicio  afTe^tl  H.  Gen.  1567.  4.  Gent  Impletatnin  «x* 
plicatio  exactis  Senatas  Genev.  c.  praef  Th.  B^fte,  Gen.  1567.  4. 

/)  T  Wonderbo^,  1542.  4. 1555.  C— Hist  Dav.  Jovla  d.  Erxketzers,  durch  d.  Unir.  BaaeL  Baa 
15C>9.  4.  II.  vltae  Dav.  Georgii  bacresiarcbae,  conscr.  ab  Ipsius  gcnero,  Kie.  Blfdikio^  ed.  J.  Rm- 
viu^  Pavcntr.  1642.  12     Je^sfiiiuK,  aufgedeckte  Larve  Dav.  GeorgiL  Kiel.  1670.  4. 

ff)  CatccbesUi  et  ConC  fldcl  coetus  per  Pol.  congregaU  in  nomine  J.  C.  Cracor.  1574  12.  known  m 
tbe  1.  Uacovlan  Catecblsm. 

h)  Blan  1r.  Conf.  AnUtr.  c.  reftitatlone  Flacli,  cd-  I/enl't,  tilmst  17M.  (0pp.  acad.  p.  t4&.) 
IlebfrU^  a.  d.  Lobren  v.  Bland.  (Tub.  Zeltacbr.  1840.  II.  4,)— 8umma  univ.  'lb.  cbr.  aec  Unitarfos 
Claudlop.  17S7.    {Ro«enmuUsr,  in  Staudlln'a  u.  Tzscb.  Arcblv.  £  KGeacb.  vol.  L  H.  1.) 

a)  Ch.  F.  lUgen,  Vite  L.  8<>clni.  Lps.  1814.  8>-mbolae  ad  vit.  et  docL  L  a  111  Lpa  S  P. 
1826-44.  4.  Orelli,  L.  Soc.  (B&sl.  xvlaa.  Zeitscbr.  1824.  vol  11.  P.  &  p  llSse.)  F.  Trtchselt  Leile 
Boslni  XL  die  Antitrinitarier  pr.  Zcit  Ueidelb.  1841 


CHAP.  IV.    ULTRAISTS.    $  872.  S0CINIAN9.    %  919.  SCHWENCKFELD.       435 

nity,  and  received  a  complete  system  of  doctrine,  {h)  Tlie  principal  article 
of  tbi3  was  an  attempt  at  an  accommodation  between  different  parties  by  the 
doctrine,  that  although  Jesus  was  born  a  mere  man,  he  was  nevertheless 
without  any  earthly  father,  and  was  wonderfully  endowed  by  God,  was 
taken  up  into  heaven,  and  as  the  reward  of  his  life  was  deified,  that  he 
might  bo  a  mediator,  to  bring  man,  alienated  from  God  by  sin,  to  the  knowl- 
edge and  grace  of  God,  and  that  he  might  reign  as  the  king  of  his  people  in 
all  periods  of  time.  As  man  is  destitute  of  any  natural  knowledge  of  God, 
divine  revelation  is  made  to  correspond  with  the  laws  of  his  mind.  Tlie 
Socinian  explanations  of  the  New  Testament  were  therefore  frequently  of  a* 
bold  and  novel  character,  but  conformed  to  the  prejudices  of  a  limited  un- 
derstanding, and  the  ethical  system  adopted  was  more  of  a  social  than  of  a 
religious  nature.  Christianity  was  viewed  on  the  whole  as  a  moral  redemp- 
tion by  our  own  efforts.  The  connection  with  the  Anabaptists,  which  Socinus 
found  already  formed,  was  very  soon  broken  off.  Socinianism  was  the  extreme 
of  opposition  to  popery,  and  was  never  a  true  pulsation,  but  the  feverish  ex- 
citement of  the  Protestant  Church  when  it  was  sinking  into  a  chill  ortho- 
doxy. Its  advocates  were  never  regarded  by  the  Protestants  as  Christiana, 
and  it  was  only  in  Altorf,  near  the  commencement  of  the  seventeenth  cen- 
tury, that  they  succeeded  in  forming  an  organized  party.  Even  this  was 
soon  suppressed.  A  few  literary  men,  especially  among  the  Arminians,  have 
been  obliged  to  defend  themselves  against  the  reproach  of  Socinianism.  (e) 
In  Poland,  the  attack  upon  Protestantism  was  most  ferocious  against  the  So- 
cinians.  In  1638  they  lost  possession  of  Racau,  where  the  Polish  nobility 
had  been  educated,  and  in  1C58  they  were  entirely  exterminated  under  the 
ostensible  charge  of  being  traitors  to  the  government,  (d)  The  exiled  con- 
gregations found  refuge  under  the  great  Elector,  and  individuals  took  up  their 
residence  in  the  Netherlands,  but  the  proper  time  for  Socinianism  as  a  sect 
was  DOW  past. 

§  373.     Caspar  Schicenckfcld  of  Ouing,     Sebastian  Francl:. 

For  his  wrltini^  see  Walch,  Bibl.  tlieol.  Tii.  IL  pi  C7.ssl  Kurze  Lebenjib.  Schw.  without  plice.  1697. 
Hist  Nacbr.  v.  8chw.  sanit  Anzahl  »r.  ^cbrr.  PrenzL  1744.  Die  wescntL  Lelire  des  Ilerrn  G.  Scbw. 
a.  »r.  GUabeosf;eni*s.«on.  Bml.  177d.  {Jdhn«)  Dankb.  Erin,  an  d.  Scbwenkfelder  zu  Philadelphia.  GorL 
18Ht — Wigaiid^^  Schwcnkfeldlanismo.  Lps.  1586.  4.  £rf/kam,  p.  SblnA.—Franrl-:  I'aradoxa  280 
d.  L  Wunderred.  aus  d.  H.  8.  <Ulm.  15^4.)  4.  Baum  d.  Wif«.  Outes  a.  Br«es.  Ulin.  1bS4.  4.  DIo 
Oaldia  Arch.  Augsbi  IStSS.  t  Das  verbuthschiert  iiiit  MU>n  SIgoIn  vcrscblossne  Bnch.  (Ibid.)  15891 
£ — S,  Th.  Wald,  do  vita  scripa.<)  et  t^jst  tnysi.  8.  Frnnci.  ErL  1793.  4.  K.  am  Ende,  kleinc  Nacbleao 
xa  d.  anvolIsL  Xaclirr.  v.  S.  Fr.  Nornb.  1796.  4.  ndt  2.  Forts?.  179:^99.  Ilaffen  vol.  III.  p.  814ea. 
JKrbkavn,  p.  iSOsa.    C.  T.  Kaim,  d.  Ket  d.  Ueicbsst  Ulni.  Stuttg.  1851.  p.  2698& 

As  the  Reformation  found  salvation  only  in  the  Scriptures  but  by  means 
o(  a  true  and  saving  faith,  the  latter,  when  it  was  especially  ardent,  some- 
times rose  against  the  narrowness  and  uncertainty  of  all  merely  external 


V)  Opp.  Irenop.  1656u  2  vols,  t  {Prtj/pcovim)  Vita  F.  8.  1686.  4.  before  0pp.  8oc.  u.  BlbL  frat 
Ptflonoram.    Soulmin^  Mem.  of  the  Life  of  F.  S.  Lond.  1777. 

c)  Jiambac/L,  ElnL  In  d.  R.  Strelt  d.  ev.  K.  mlt  d.  Soc  Cob.  1T58.  2  vols.  4.    Zelttur,  U.  Crypto- 
Bodoismi  Altorflnae  Acad.  InfestL  LpH.  1729.  2  vols.  4. 

d)  Prodltlones  Arlanoram  patriae  suae  sub  tcmpus  belli  SaecicL  1657.  4.    On  the  other  side :  Z«> 
^i^tUeeU  Memoriale  in  causa  Fratnim  Unitar.  StetinL  1659. 


450  MODERN  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER  V.    A.  D.  161T-16ia 


CHAP.  VI.— THE  ROMAN  CATHOLIO  CHURCH. 

Sarpi^  PaUaTi'Hni,  (p.  359.)  YiUe  et  res  gestae  Pontlflcam  Rom.  et  Cardd.  anctortbns  OfomNtio, 
Cabrera^  Victorello.  Rom.  1680.  f.  L.  Rankt^  d.  rom.  Piipete,  ihro  Klrche  n.  Ibr.  Staat  im  16^  o. 
17.  Jabrh.  Brl.  (1884ss.)  ISSTas.  8  vota.  Jl^de,  &.  d.  Bchicksale  d.  E.  a.  d.  Trido&tiBom.  (Tlih. 
Quartatech.  ISM.  H.  1.) 

§  881.     The  Popes  in  the  Age  of  the  Reformation^  till  1685. 

Onu/rio  Pantini^  Platina  restltatus  c  additlone.  Pontt  a  SIxto  IV.  usque  ad  Piom  lY.  Yen. 
1583.  4  and  often.  A.  du  Cheane,  U.  des  Papes.  Par.  1646.  f.  oont  (till  Paul  Y.)  p.  Fr.  du  C*A«mm^ 
Par.  165a  2  vula.  t  Rambach,  \l\sL  d.  P&pste.  (oont  \>j  Bower,  10th  voL)  Magd.  ITTfti  S 
AbNshn.  4.  [B.  Platina^  Lives  of  the  Popes  from  the  time  of  (Hirlst  to  Slxtns  IV.  transL  and  eoat 
(till  16S5.)  by  P.  Pj/caut,  Lond.  1635.  f.  liotcer's  Lives  of  the  Popes  till  175S,  coot  hj  &  Jl  Qm 
till  now.  2  od.  New  York.  1885.  8  vols.  8.] 

During  the  contests  between  France  and  Spain  for  the  possesdion  of  Italy, 
Leo  X.  formed  an  alliance  with  the  emperor,  and  died  exulting  over  their 
common  victory  (Dec.  1st,  1521),  and  with  the  reputation  of  having  ex- 
hausted the  revenues  of  three  pontificates.  Hadrian  VL  (1622-28),  of 
Utrecht,  an  ardent  literary  man,  hut  with  no  taste  for  art  and  poetry,  a  pre- 
ceptor of  the  emperor,  and  twice  regent  of  Spmn,  though  regarding  his  pos- 
session of  sovereign  authority  as  the  most  unfortunate  circnmstance  of  his 
Ufe,  came  to  the  papal  chair  entirely  unacquainted  with  Roman  affairs,  or  tbe 
various  intrigues  of  that  period  with  respect  to  Italy,  and  became  most  pain- 
fully conscious  of  the  dependence  of  even  the  best  of  men  upon  the  times  in 
which  they  live.  The  efforts  he  put  forth  for  the  deliverance  of  Rhodes 
from  the  hands  of  the  Turks  were  utterly  unsuccessful,  and  be  finally  died 
under  tlio  burden  of  his  official  duties,  (a)  Clement  VIL  (1528-84),  a  natu- 
ral son  of  Julian  de  Medici,  made  an  earnest  but  ineffectual  effort  for  the 
independence  of  Italy  (p.  881).  Rome  was  once  more  plundered  by  the  bar- 
barians, and  the  vicar  of  Christ  was  obliged  to  pay  dearly  for  the  procession 
w^hich  the  emperor  contrived  for  his  liberation.  lie  was,  however,  success- 
ful in  his  policy  of  employing  the  imperial  forces  to  secure  the  possesion  of 
Florence  as  an  inheritance  of  his  family,  and  in  elevating  his  niece  to  the 
throne  of  France,  (b)  Paul  III.  (Farnese,  1584-49)  was  himself  acquainted 
with  polite  Uterature,  and  honored  it  in  others ;  he  adorned  the  city  of  Rome 
with  many  works  of  art,  exhausted  his  resources  in  unfortunate  schemes  to 
acquire  principalities  for  his  sons  and  grandsons,  and  by  subsidies  against  the 
Protestants  laid  the  foundation  for  the  load  of  debt  under  which  the  States 
of  the  Church  have  since  groaned.  He  soon,  however,  became  alarmed  at 
the  sudden  success  of  the  emperor,  and  subsequently,  as  fur  as  was  possible 
for  a  pope,  ho  acted  in  political  concert  with  the  Protestants.  He  appointed 
to  the  office  of  cardinal  men  of  profound  piety,  and  committed  to  their  hands 
the  duty  of  forming  a  plan  for  the  reformation  of  the  Church.  They  repre- 
sented the  papacy  as  the  true  source  of  all  abuses,  and  proposed  measures 
against  the  secularization  of  ecclesiastical  offices  and  endowments,  and  against 
the  incompetency  and  immorality  of  the  clergy.  Such  a  plan  the  cardinals 
concluded  should  be  introduced,  only  very  gradually,  and  with  great  secrecy. 


a)  Biographies  by  Giovto  and  others  in  Burmanf^  (p^  874) 
h)  ZUgletf  H.  Qem.  (ScMhonk,  Amoenn.  H.  eee.  toL  L  p.  SlOl) 


CHAP.  VL    CATH.  CHUECIL    1 881.  JULIUS  IIL    PAUL  IV.    PIUS  IV.        451 

The  knowledge  of  it,  however,  was  betrayed  to  the  Protestants,  was  pub- 
lished by  ihem  to  show  how  much  even  their  adversaries  had  conceded,  and 
was  eomraented  upon  by  Luther  with  unreasonable  raillery,  and  the  pope 
found  it  better  to  introduce  the  inquisition  instead  of  the  Reformation,  (c) 
Julius  IIL  (Del  Monte,  1560-55),  with  an  impudent  affectation  of  modesty, 
attempted  to  justify  his  elevation  of  the  keeper  of  hb  moukeys  to  the  dig- 
nity of  a  cardinal,  and  although  abundantly  competent  to  the  duties  of  his 
station,  speut  the  whole  period  of  his  pontificate  in  enjoying  himself  in  his  beau- 
tiful villa.    There  was,  however,  a  party  continually  becoming  more  power- 
fbl,  which  was  convinced  that  the  Church  could  never  be  delivered  but  by 
piety  and  a  rigid  morality.    Their  first  choice  fell  upon  Mareellus  II.  (1555), 
but  he  was  destined  by  Providence  barely  to  make  his  appearance  in  the 
papal  chair.  (<0    Paxil  IV,  (CaraflBi,  1555-59)  brought  to  the  throne  the 
gloomy  severity  of  an  octogenarian  monk,  and  was  inflexibly  strict  toward 
himself,  toward  others,  and  even  toward  his  guilty  nephews,  but  proved  him- 
self a  terrible  enemy  to  heretics,  and  gathered  around  himself  a  shadow  of  the 
ancient  hierarchy.    For  a  while  his  patriotic  feelings  obtained  the  mastery, 
and  induced  him  to  form  an  alliance  with  France  to  effect  the  liberation  of  Italy 
from  the  power  of  Spain.   A  heretic  infantry  defended  Rome  against  a  Catholic 
army,  and  nothing  but  Philip^s  piety  toward  his  Church  prompted  him  to  grant 
the  pope  an  honorable  peace.    On  the  day  he  died,  his  statue  was  mutilated 
by  the  people,  and  the  house  of  the  inquisition  was  reduced  to  ashes,  {e) 
PiuM  IV,  (Medici  of  Milan,  1559-65),  condescending  and  pleasant  as  he  was 
by  nature,  allowed  all  the  measures  adopted  by  his  predecessor  to  remain  in 
force,  eatablbhed  the  papal  authority  by  his  moderation  and  conciliatory  con- 
duct toward  the  princes,  conceded  the  use  of  the  cup  in  Austria  as  far  as  the 
German  princes  and  bishops  thought  it  needful  for  their  country,  and  sus- 
tained the  heroic  efforts  of  the  Knights  of  8t  John  for  the  deliverance  of 
IWta.  (/)    The  Dominican  Pirn  V.  (Ghislieri,  1566-72),  a  i)ious  judge  in 
tQ  matters  connected  with  morality  and  heresy,  realized  as  much  as  {xissible 
in  the  court  and  the  Church  generally,  the  ideal  of  the  rigidly  crevout  party, 
oicouraged  the  violent  and  sanguinary  measures  then  adopted  against  the 
Protestants,  and  assisted  in  gaining  the  naval  victory  of  Lepanto  against  the 
Turks,  {g)   Gregory  XIII,  (Buoncompagno,  1572-85)  established  learned  eccle- 
iiastical  schools  especially  for  missions,  corrected  the  book  of  canon  law  by  ap- 
peals to  the  original  authorities  (p.  28G),  and  the  ecclesiastical  and  civil  was 
nude  to  harmonize  with  the  solar  year.  (/<)   In  consequence  of  his  attempt  to 


t)  {A.  M.  Quirini)  imago  opt  Pootificis  expraMa  fn  gieetis  P.  IIL  Brix.  1745.  4.  On  the  other 
Me:  £Uding,  Ep.  de  g«f^8  P.  Lps.  1747.  4.  StMhom,  Ep.  II.  de  eniendftuda  Ecc.  Tur.  1748. 
W4kk  vol.  XVL  p.  2S948&  cf.  Bulla  licforniat  PauH  III.  ad  Hist  Ck>ne.  Trid.  i>ertinons,  concepta, 
Boa  vn%atat  ^  Clausen^  Ilavn.  1880.  4.  [Noceflsitj  of  Ref  prcaonted  to  the  Diet  of  8|M*yer,  Letter 
«i  fuA  IIL  to  Charles  V.,  and  Calvin's  Kemarka.  transL  by  Beeeridffe,  PbUad.  18SS.  18.] 
d)  P.  Pkftidori  de  vita  Marc.  IL  oomnicntar.  Rom.  1741  4 

if)  A.  Curaccioli,  Col  bi«t  de  vita  P.  IV.  CoL  1612.  4u    F.  Magii  DIaqq.  hist  de  P.  IV.  tnculpata 
Ttta.  N«ap.  K78L  t    Bromato,  Storia  df  Paolo  IV.  Bom.  1748.  2  vola  4 
/)  Leomirdi  Or.  de  laudib.  Pii  IV.  Pa<L  1065. 

g)  //.  Catena,  ViUdcl  P.  Pio  V.  Kom.  l&SCi  A.    J.  A.  GahuUi  de  rlU  Pfi  V.  Rom.  160S.  t 
(icu  SS.  yia^.  Tb.  I.  p^  616.)    A.  Btorii  P.  V.  Rom.  1672.  t    P.  A.  Maffei,  Vito  dl  8.  Pio.  Ven. 
irii.  4    Jiendham,  Lifo  of  S.  Plus  V.  Lond.  1S8& 
h)  Comp.  F.  Piper,  Oeach.  d.  Osterfestes  a  d.  EaleDdexreform.  BrL  184S. 


452  MODERN  CUUECH  HISTORY.    PER.  V.    A.  D.  1517-1648. 

relieve  the  finances  of  the  state  by  restoring  long-forgotten  fendal  tenures 
which  he  had  no  power  to  enforce,  he  revived  old  party  dissensions,  and 
increased  the  nnmber  of  the  banditti  until  they  openly  took  the  field  as  an 
organized  array.  (0 

§  382.     Ignatius  de  Loyola^  1491-1566. 

I.  Ribadeneira,  (according  to  the  account  of  Con8Alrn»)  Vita  Ignat  Neap.  1572.  and  often. 
Mnfffi^  (according  to  the  account  of  Polancus)  de  vita  et  m(n1b.  Ignat  L.  Bom.  1535.  4.  and  often. 
Cf.  AcU  SS.  Jul.  voL  VII.  p.  409. 

II.  Boiihouri^  Vie  de  S.  I^'njico.  Par.  (1679.  4)  ICSO.  trans,  by  ITaza-Iladlitz.  Vlen.  18».     Gtnetii, 

Leben  d.  h.  Ign.  v.  L.  Innspr.  1S47.— /Afn^*,  Lebon  I.  L.  Bo^  1721.    F.  KortHm^  EntMebnngi- 

geech.  d.  J.  O.  Mannh.  lS48b    [/.  Taylor,  Loyola  an<l  Jesuitism  In  Its  Budlmenta.  Lond.  1849.  8.    K 

W.  OrinJMd,  Hist  of  tbo  Jesuits.  Lond.  1:^53.  8.     T.  J.  Bum^  Gesch.  d.  Ordens.  d.  J.  only  Part  L  If 

published.  Lps.  1858.] 

Don  Inigo  de  Loyola^  a  i^ative  of  the  mountains  in  the  Basque  provinces 
of  Spain,  was  thrown  upon  a  sick-bed  in  consequence  of  severe  wounds  re- 
ceived during  the  heroic  defence  of  Pampeluna  (1521),  and  while  reading 
the  history  of  the  saints,  became  filled  with  a  longing  to  acquire,  like  St. 
Francis,  a  glorious  crown  in  heaven  by  earthly  sufferings.  Having  been 
betrothed  as  a  spiritual  Amadis  to  the  Holy  Virgin,  he  endeavored  by  ex- 
treme self-denials  and  temptations  to  acquire  an  education  and  sphere  of 
activity  worthy  of  such  a  knighthood.  With  six  companions  in  the  Church 
of  the  Virgin  Mary  at  Montmartre  (1534),  besides  taking  the  ordinary  monas- 
tic vows,  he  solemnly  pledged  himself  to  take  care  of  himself,  to  minister  to 
pilgrims,  to  seek  the  conversion  of  the  Saracens,  and  to  receive  with  the 
most  confiding  obedience  every  command  which  the  Holy  Father  might 
impose  with  respect  to  any  sphere  of  duty.  After  much  reflection,  Paul 
III,  (1540)  granted  this  Society  of  Jeaus^  which  at  first  consisted  of  but  sixty 
members,  his  permission  to  devote  themselves  as  a  community  to  the  ad- 
vancement of  the  soul  in  the  Christian  life  and  faith,  and  as  a  military  com- 
pany to  the  extension  of  Christian  truth,  (a)  Ignatius  was  elected  the  firrt 
general  ofHhe  order,  and  he  obtained  for  it  (1545)  all  the  privileges  of  the 
mendicant  friars.  He  soon  saw  it  extending  into  all  parts  of  Europe,  and 
under  the  conduct  of  Xavier,  developing  its  operations  for  the  conversion  of 
the  heathen  beyond  the  ocean.  The  mind  of  Ignatius  was  somewhat  con- 
tracted, but  he  possessed  an  indomitable  wiU,  and  his  whole  life  was  spent  in 
the  relief  of  the  sick,  the  instruction  of  children,  and  the  care  of  souls.  He 
endeavored  always  to  keep  his  mind  so  occupied  with  spiritual  exercises,  that 
his  religious  feelings  and  his  imagination  were  in  continual  excitement,  and 
yet  were  firmly  held  in  a  given  direction,  (h) 

0  M.  A.  Ciappij  Comp.  delle  attioni  e  s.  vlU  di  Or.  Bom.  (1591.)  1596w  i.    Ji  Bomptani  B.  pen- 
tif.  Gr.  Dill.  1685.    Mvffei,  Ann.  Gr.  Bom.  1742.  2  vols.  4. 

a)  Litt.  apost,  quibus  institutio,  conflnn.  et  yarla  privUL  continentur  8.  J.  Antr.  ICSfi. 

b)  Exercitia  splritualla  8.  P.  Ign.  Loyolae.  Antv.  1689.  and  often.  Lond.  1888.    Directorlam  la 
exerc.  spir.  Antv.  1688. 


OHAP.  VL    CATtt  CnURCII.    §  8S8.  JESUITISM.  453 

§  388.    Jesuitism, 

L  ConsHtntiones  Soc.  Jean.  (Knm.  1588.)  Antu.  1685.  (Corpus  {n^titatorum  B.  J.  Anto.  1703.  9 
Tote.  4)  InBtitatam  8.  J.  Prag.  1757.  2  vols.  4  Hist  3.  J.  anctore  Orlandino,  (Rom.  1G15.)  Sac- 
ehino,  Poh^no^  Juvencio^  Cordara.  Antu.  1620.  1750.  G  vol&  f. 

IL  HUL  d«  la  comp.  de  Jesus.  Par.  1740.  4  vols,  and  often.  Illst  Ehrcntempcl  d.  Qcsell.  J. 
VIen.  1S41.— ^.  C.  DaUtrs,  H.  of  the  Josultst  Lond.  1S16.  2  vols.  Mlt  Erl.  (v.  F.  v.  Kett.)  DQsseld. 
1*».  t  vols.  iL  Nachtr.  MQncb.  1S21.--&  SugenJuim^  Gesch.  d.  Jes.  In  DeutschL  Frkf.  1848.  2  vols.— 
/?.  lIoif>inititti  H.  Jesuitica.  (Tig.  1619.)  Gen.  1670.  f.  Jlarenherg^  pragm.  Gesch.  d.  O.  d.  J.  Hal. 
I76a  2  vols.  {AdHung)  Vra.  e.  Gesch.  d.  J.  Brl.  n.  Hal.  1769s.  2  vt.ls.  P.  P.  Wolf,  allg.  Gesch.  d.  J. 
(ZQr.  17S9sa.)  Lps.  180a  4  vols.  SpittUr,  Q.  Gesch.  u.  Vorf  d.  J.  O.  Lps,  1817.  [Cretinfnn  Jolij,  Illst 
r*L  poL  et  lit  de  la  Comp.  d.  J.  Par.  1S46.  2  ed.  6  vols.  12.  A.  SteinmtU,  Hist  of  J.  from  the  Germ. 
Philad.  1S40.  8  vols.  Rafcaignan^  Life  and  Inst  of  J.  New  York.  12.  K  Duller^  J.  as  they  were 
and  are,  flrom  the  Germ.  Lond.  1S45.  12.  W.  H.  RuUy  Celebrated  Jei(nit^  Xavler,  Lnynez,  Garntilt 
Bellarmiiie,  Schall,  and  Gruber.  Lond.  1858.  8.  MlcheUt  &,  Quinet,  The  J.  fk-om  the  Fr.  New  York. 
1S42. 12.    J.  Poyndtr,  H.  of  the  J.  Lond.  1816.  2  vola  Svo.] 

A  few  sagacious  and  enthusiastic  spirits  connected  with  the  order,  well 
understood  the  peculiar  wants  of  the  ago,  and  by  a  dexterous  adaptation  of 
it  to  these,  even  under  the  administration  of  its  second  General  Lainez  (d. 
1564),  it  became  conscious  of  its  general  power  to  maintain  the  cause  of  the 
hierarchy  against  Protestantism,  whether  within  or  beyond  the  limits  of  the 
Roman  Church.    Before  any  could  become  members,  they  were  required  to 
pass  through  a  novitiate,  in  wliich  they  were  severely  and  appropriately 
tested.    Of  the  actual  members,  some  were  called  scholastics,  others  coadju- 
tors, secular  or  spiritual,  and  only  a  few  choice  spirits  reached  the  perfect 
dignity  of  the  Professed.    From  the  latter  were  chosen  the  principal  officers, 
the  Soperiors,  and  the  Provincials,  constituting  a  well  organized  train  of 
anthorities  up  to  the  General  of  the  Order  in  Rome  with  his  assistant  Coun- 
cil.   Every  individual  was  powerful  in  his  appropriate  sphere,  but  in  every 
act  be  was  closely  watched  and  guarded  lest  he  should  transcend  his  proper 
limits.    So  perfect  was  the  obedience  inculcated  by  a  long  course  of  disci- 
pline, and  strengthened  by  every  spiritual  means,  that  with  the  exception  of 
some  internal  storms,  a  single  arbitrary  but  inflexible  will  controlled  every 
moTement  of  the  order  in  all  parts  of  the  world.    And  yet,  although  each 
isdividual  possessed  no  more  will  of  his  own  than  the  particular  members  of 
the  human  body,  he  expected  to  be  placed  in  precisely  that  position  in  which 
his  talents  would  be  best  developed  for  the  common  benefit,  in  exercises  of 
monastic  devotion,  in  literary  and  scientific  pursuits,  in  the  secular  life  of 
courts,  or  in  strange  adventures  and  eminent  offices  among  savage  nations. 
All  became  accustomed  to  regard  the  order  as  their  only  home,  and  their 
superiors  as  their  only  providence.    The  movements  of  this  order  were  not 
impeded  by  the  clumsy  machinery  of  ancient  monasticLsm,  for  it  had  at  its 
command  all  kinds  of  ecclesiastical  dispensations,  and  as  a  third  kind  of 
monasticism,  completely  restored  to  the  various  occupations  of  the  Avorld,  it 
entered  into  every  relation  of  social  and  secular  life,  (ft)    At  the  close  of  the 
century  in  which  it  was  established,  by  the  multitude  of  its  members  engaged 
in  the  instruction  of  youth,  and  appointed  to  be  the  guardians  of  i)riiiccs,  it 
had  become  the  most  important  power  in  the  Catholic  Church.    The  Jesuits 
also  endeavored  to  become  proficient  in  every  kind  of  intellectual  cultivation. 


a)  II.  r.  Or€Ui^  d.  Weeen  d.  Jai  Ordeoa.  p.  186p. 


454  MODEBN  CnUBCH  HISTORY.    PER.  T.    A.  D.  iMT-ie48L 

as  the  only  way  to  obtain  ascendency  in  the  world  of  mind.  Bat  although 
they  had  among  them  a  multitude  of  learned  men  in  every  department  of  lit- 
erature, the  curse  of  their  struggle  against  human  freedom  rested  vpoo 
them,  and  not  a  single  great  work  was  given  by  them  to  the  worid.  FnH 
of  pomp  as  their  churches  generally  were,  very  little  genuine  taste,  and 
scarcely  any  true  works  of  art,  were  to  be  seen,  and  they  seemed  like  post- 
humous  sons  of  their  parent  Catholicism.  They  gave  their  conntenanoe  to 
every  fantastic  and  gloomy  superstition,  though  it  must  be  conceded  that  it 
was  a  Jesuit  whose  tender  spirit  moved  him  to  be  the  first  to  arouse  the 
people  by  his  awakening  appeals  against  the  abominations  of  the  trials  of  the 
witches,  (b)  In  spite  of  the  ill-will  of  the  other  orders,  and  the  snspieioiis 
of  some  governments,  public  sentiment  in  Catholic  countries  was  in  their 
favor.  But  in  their  efforts  to  become  all  things  to  all  men,  and  to  make  the 
way  of  salvation  easy,  some  of  them  indulged  in  an  inconsiderate  boldness  of 
assertion,  which  was  not  properly  rebuked  by  their  leaders,  and  thus  tlietr 
enemies  found  occasion  for  accusing  them  of  maintaining  the  hierarchiea] 
views  of  former  times  (p.  834)  respecting  the  inferior  importance  of  ordinary 
duties  in  comparison  with  the  attainment  of  a  supreme  object,  of  putting 
forth  general  maxims  dangerous  to  the  security  of  aU  laws,  and  of  oompoeing 
a  science  of  casuistry,  in  which  pedantry  and  frivolity  were  equally  coaspicn- 
ous,  but  which  seriously  impaired  the  inviolability  of  the  moral  law.  (r) 

§  884.     The  C(ntn€%l  of  Trent    Dec,  18,  1546-jD«5.  4, 1568. 

L  Cftnoncs  et  deer.  C.  Trfd.  Som.  15M  4  and  oft.  ed.  Jod.  is  Phtt,  Lor.  1770  4  Lpa.  185ft  Ate 
B.  Congr.  Card.  Cone.  Trid.  interpretam  Resolutiones  et  GoDsUtt  PoattC  reoratlorM  ad  laaooauam* 
Bpect  ctl.  Aem.  L.  RichUr,  Lpa.  1S5S.  [CanonB  and  Decrees  of  the  (Ecamen.  Coiiacll  of  Ttaot. 
transl.  by  J.  WaUncorth,  with  Essays  on  the  Hist  of  the  CoaocU.  liood.  1848.  8]— (/*.  eC  J.  du  Pny) 
Instmctions  et  n)is.oives  des  Hofs  dc  France  et  de  leurs  Ambaas.  et  antres  actes  eonctm.  le  dme  da 
TV.  Par.  (1607.)  ed.  4  1654.  4.  Lett  et  M^mofree  da  Fr.  de  Vargat^  etc;  trad.  p.  M.  de  F«ai»r, 
Anist  1699.  lat  fee.  Schntmm,  Bmnsv.  1704.  4.  Moon,  ad  Ilkt  C.  Tr.  spect  amplta.  CoL  of,  Jod. 
U  PUit,  Lov.  17S1-7.  7  vols.  4.  G.  J.  Planck,  Aneedota  ad  U.  C.  Tr.  Oott  1791-181&  25.  Fasec;  J. 
MendhariL,  Memuirs  of  the  Council  of  Trent  Losd.  ISM.  4.  Acta  C  Tr.  ab  a.  UMl  a  6dhr.  ftar> 
dinaU  PaUotto  descr.  ed.  Mend  ham,  Lond.  1849L  [The  ConncU  of  Tf.  and  tta  pfOoaedin|giL  (FnK 
Board  of  Publ.)  Philad.  1885.  18.] 

H.  Sarpi,  PaUavicini  (p.  850.)  [P.  P.  Sarpi,  H.  of  the  C  of  Tr.  traul.  bj  A  Mtmnt,  Lond. 
1676.  t  P.  S.  PaUavicini,  IL  du  Cone  dn  Trcnte.  Montronge.  1844.  8  Tola  8]  Cooip.  J.  K,  JBHttekar, 
Beurtb.  d.  Controversen  Sarpi's  a.  Pall  T&b;  1848.  2  rola.  L  JSU.  du  Pin,  B.  dv  C  da  Treate;. 
Brax.  1721.  2  voi.«.  4.  Silig,  Tollst  Hiat  des  Tr.  Gone  HaL  1741  sbl  S  toIb.  A.  J,  M.  GieeU^  Geach. 
d.  C.  z.  Tr.  Katisb.  1840.  2  voI&  Weweriberg  (p.  277.)  toI  IIL  IV.  J.T.L.  Dana^  Gaedi.  d.  Tr.  C 
•len.  1816.  [Bungener,  Hist  of  C.  of  Trent  from  the  Germ.  Lond.  1853.  ^  A,  L.  Riekier^  Caoona 
and  Decrees  of  the  C.  of  Trent  Berl.  1856.  9.] 

The  general  conncil  long  called  for  by  the  nations  of  Europe  to  restore 
peace  to  the  Church,  and  to  reform  its  abuses  by  a  process  accordant  with 
legal  forms,  was  finally  convened  by  Paul  IIL    The  objects  expressed  in  the 

h)  {Fr.  Spee)  Cautio  criminaUs  &  de  process,  c.  safas.  Rint  1681.  FreC  16M.  a»d  olUa. 

c)  Especinlty  after  TK  Sanchte,  de  sacramento  matrlm.  Gen.  169Sl  8  Tola,  and  eft.  A.  #«  K»^ 
har,  L.  The«>I.  moralis,  24  8.  J.  Doctoribus  reaeratoa.  Lngd.  1648.  and  oft— Satire:  Moaita  prirata 
8.  J.  Notubirgac  (Krakaa>  1612.  and  oft— JC  Chemnitiiu,  TheoL  Jeaoritar.  praec  cappc  Lpi«.  15;'>ii. 
l>octrinae  Jesuitar.  praec.  capp.  conftitata.  Rapellae  ed.  2.  1564.  {G  Sdoppiuey  Aaatomla  8.  J.  1<»K, 
4.  {X.  PerranU)  La  Morale  des  J68i  oxtralte  de  lears  Ilfrea.  Mon&  1609L  8  toIil  12.  J,  MtUndot/, 
d.  Moral  u.  Pulitik  d.  J.  Darmst  1840.— Defence :  J.  R  Leu,  Beitrr.  z.WGirdl^  d.  J.  O.  (^er  Mrblar.) 
Lac.  1840.    F.  J.  Bum,  Die  Geaellaeh.  J.  Mainz.  18S&  Abth.  L 


CHAP.  YL    CATH.  CUUBCIL    %  884  COUNCIL  OF  TBENT.  455 

tenns  of  the  call  were  to  exterminate  heretics,  and  to  secure  definitively  the 
internal  unity  of  the  Church,  in  the  Romish  sense  of  these  terms.  It  was 
opened  at  Trent  just  as  war  had  been  declared  against  the  Protestants,  but 
after  the  emperor^s  victories,  the  pope  saw  that  the  imperial  influence  waa 
greater  in  a  council  assembled  in  a  German  territory  than  that  of  the  Holy 
Spirit.  The  place  of  meeting  was  therefore  changed  to  Bologna  (1547),  un- 
der the  pretence  of  danger  from  a  pestilence,  and  when  the  imperial  bishops 
sdll  remuned  at  Trent,  it  was  adjourned  to  1548.  Julius  III.  so  far  yielded 
to  the  threats  and  promises  of  the  emperor,  that  he  ordered  the  syno<l  to 
oontinae  its  sessions  at  Trent  on  May  1,  1551.  Some  Protestant  delegates 
had  already  arrived,  and  others  were  on  their  way,  when  for  fear  of  Maurice 
of  Saxony,  the  assembly  adjourned  April  28th,  1552,  for  two  years.  It  was 
Doti  however,  reassembled  untU  by  order  of  Pius  IV.,  Jan.  8,  1562.  The 
order  of  business  for  the  assembly,  after  every  thing  that  could  produce  any 
reooUecdon  of  Basle  was  set  aside,  was  entirely  under  the  control  of  the  pre- 
ading  legates.  The  twenty-five  sessions  were  merely  public  solemnities,  at 
which  the  decrees  debated  and  prepared  in  the  committees  were  openly  pro- 
ckumed.  The  decrees  were  passed  by  a  migority  of  the  bishops  and  generals 
of  orders  present  at  the  time,  of  which  the  Italians  were  more  numerous 
than  all  the  other  nations  together.  The  opposition,  especially  of  the  French 
and  Spamsh  bishops,  became  sometimes  very  formidable,  and  by  these  the  de- 
mands of  the  Protestant  deputies  were  welcomed  with  much  favor,  (a) 
£ven  the  fundamental  doctrines  of  the  Protestants  respecting  the  Scriptures 
and  Justification,  or  views  consistent  with  them,  found  some  to  advocate 
them,  (b)  and  the  emperor,  with  the  French  king,  made  important  demands 
for  a  reformation;  but  when  this  liberal  party  was  seen  to  have  become 
Protestant,  or  were  frightened  by  finding  themselves  tending  toward  that 
result,  the  papal  party  by  treaties  with  the  courts  and  with  individual  pre- 
lates obtained  a  complete  victory,  (c)  Decrees  respecting  doctrines,  and  de- 
crees for  the  reformation  of  tlie  Church,  were  after  tlie  fourth  session 
published  alternately.  The  former  contained  a  revision  of  the  previous  sys- 
tems of  doctrine,  and  as  far  as  the  dogmas  of  the  middle  ages  advocated  by 
the  different  theological  schools  could  be  made  to  harmonize,  thoy  were 
stamped  with  the  seal  of  infallibility,  and  most  of  the  Protestant  deviations 
from  them  were  condemned.  In  the  decrees  for  reformation,  many  salutary 
rules  were  adopted  for  the  government  and  discipline  of  the  Church,  and 
many  canons  of  the  ancient  Church  were  revived.  These  decrees  were  all 
confirmed  by  Pius  IV.,  who  reserved  to  himself  the  paptd  prerogative  of  ex- 
plaining them  as  he  pleased.  The  S3mod  of  Trent  was  accepted  uncondition- 
ally by  most  of  the  Italian  States,  by  Portugal,  Poland,  and  the  emperor;  and 
with  a  reservation  of  the  royal  prerogatives  by  Spain,  Naples,  and  Belgium ; 
with  some  exceptions  by  Switzerland  and  Ilungary ;  and  only  so  far  as  re- 
spects doctrines  by  France,  (d) 


a)  Varga^  Lett  et  Mem.  p.  408a.     Wees^nberff^  yoL  IIL  p.  Sllra. 

b)  Sarpi  I IL  p.  MQsft.  8228a.    Pallacleini  yill,  11.  4.    Ilormayr^  Tascbenb.  f.  vaterl  Oeech. 
ISSt.  pk  laOMk       c)  Rankt^  Pipftte  toL  L  p.  SSSsa. 

d)  Camrayw^  H.  de  U  reception  da  C  de  Trenta.  Amst  1756^ 


456  MODEBN  CHURCH  HISTOBT.    FEB.  T.    A.  D.  18ir-164& 

§  885.    Sixtu9  F.    April  27,  1686-^w^.  27, 1690. 

Robardi,  8Ixti  V.  go^ta  qulnqacnnalia.  Rom.  1590.  4.  Leti^  Vita  dl  Sisto  Y.  Locannm.  1969.  9 
Th.  later  in  8  vols,  and  often,  esfi  in  Fr.  Par.  1702.  2  vola.  Defended  with  a  parti«an  liplrlt  bj  C. 
Tempettiy  Storla  dclla  vita  e  geste  di  Bisto  Y.  Rom.  1755.  2  vola.  4  Comp.  Rante^  Pupate.  Tel. 
IIL  p.  817n. 

Felix  Peretti  made  liis  way  from  the  herd  to  the  throne  by  his  pionn  zeal 
as  a  Franciscan,  a  preacher,  and  an  inquisitor,  and  when  a  cardinal  under  tlie 
name  of  Montalto  (after  1576),  by  an  humble  deportment  and  a  complete 
renunciation  of  his  natural  and  impetuous  love  of  command.  The  style  in 
which  this  contrast  between  his  earlier  and  his  later  life  is  mentioned  io 
popular  accounts,  only  shows  by  what  qualities  and  conduct  the  people  of  that 
period  generally  believed  that  the  triple  crown  could  best  be  won.  Having 
attained  this  highest  point  of  his  ambition,  Si^tng  F.  thought  that  nothing 
was  impossible  for  him,  and  while  grasping  with  his  utmost  power  every 
thing  actual  and  possible,  he  busied  himself  with  the  most  fantastic  and  stu- 
pendous plans.  The  utmost  that  human  power  and  sagacity  oould  do  was 
accomplished  by  him  in  maintaining  the  papal  authority,  in  opposition  to 
princes  who  were  either  contending  for  the  Reformation,  or  had  already 
made  peace  with  its  friends.  Instead  of  vainly  attempting  to  put  down  here- 
tics, he  concluded  that  he  might  profitably  make  use  of  them  in  firmly  bind- 
ing the  Catholic  kings  to  the  interests  of  the  papal  see.  But  in  the  contest 
between  France  and  Spain,  he  saw  only  a  contention  between  the  mOder  and 
the  more  rigid  parties  in  the  great  Catholic  body  itself,  and  hence  his  atten- 
tion was  distracted  and  his  practical  energy  was  enfeebled.  Under  his  direc- 
tion the  banditti  were  completely  destroyed ;  by  the  exercise  of  an  inexorable 
and  almost  barbarous  severity  the  authority  of  law  was  re-established  in  his 
territories ;  a  wise  system  was  put  in  practice  for  the  support  of  tbe  poor ; 
industry  was  awakened ;  the  Vatican  library  attained  a  magnificent  size;  vari- 
ous works  in  biblical  literature  were  printed  ;  the  printing-press  in  the  Vati- 
can for  the  publication  of  all  that  has  reached  us  from  the  ancient  Church, 
beginning  with  the  Scriptures,  wa<i  established  ;  the  vast  works  of  antiquity 
were  rescued  from  their  rubbish,  as  far  at  least  as  they  could  become  useful 
in  illustrating  the  triumphs  of  the  cross ;  and,  although  he  placed  by  the  side 
of  these  many  new  edifices  not  unworthy  of  the  association,  and  even  en- 
riched his  relatives,  he  left  behind  him  a  vast  treasure  in  the  castle  of  St. 
Angelo,  from  loans  and  an  increased  sale  of  offices,  to  be  used  by  his  suooess- 
ors  only  in  cireunistanccs  strictly  defined.  His  government  was  not  accord- 
ing to  the  taste  of  the  Roman  people,  and  the  Jesuits,  whom  he  hated,  did 
much  to  curtail  his  reputation,  if  not  his  life.  But  so  profound  and  so  poetio 
was  the  impression  which  he  produced  upon  his  contemporaries,  that  even  in 
his  own  age  his  hopes,  his  achievements,  and  his  fortunes  became  incorpo- 
rated in  various  forms  among  the  legends  of  the  people. 

§  386.     Pope^  of  the  Seventeenth  Century, 

Clement  VIIL  (Aldobrandini,  1592-1605)  was  in  the  sight  of  God  ancL 
man  a  priest  of  extraordinary  piety  in  the  ecclesiastical  sense  of  tliat  word. 
In  spite  of  the  opposition  of  the  rigidly  Catholic  party,  with  a  wise  ostenta- 


CHAP.  VI.    CATH.  CHURCH.    S  8861  CLEMENT  VIIL    PAUL  V.    OBEQOBY  XV.    457 

tion  Le  absolved  Henry  lY.  from  papal  exoommanicatioD,  and  thereby  formed 
&  needfnl  ooanterbalance  to  the  oppressive  friendship  of  Spain.    He  was 
obliged  to  act  with  zeal  against  the  Edict  of  Nantes,  and  yet  toward  indi- 
vidual Protestants  he  exhibited  many  tokens  of  personal  friendship.    His 
inflnence  upon  France,  Spain,  and  Savoy  was  that  of  a  prince  of  pe.ice ;  but 
when  the  tme  house  of  Este  had  become  extinct,  he  took  possession  of  Fer- 
rara  as  an  escheated  fief,  by  military  force,  preceded  by  tlie  terrors  of  an  ex- 
oommunication*    By  sach  means  a  termination  was  given  to  the  exercise  of 
arbitrary  power  in  Ferrara,  bat  with  it  aL<u>  ceased  the  cheerful  splendor  of  a 
eourt  adorned  by  knights,  art,  and  literature,  (a)  Paul  V,  (Borglicse,  1605-21) 
regarded  himself  as  the  appointed  instrument  of  the  Holy  Ghost  to  render 
the  decretals  of  his  predecessors  equal  in  authority  to  divine  laws,  in  an  age 
which  he  misunderstood.    This  produced  many  disagreements  between  him 
and  the  different  Italian  states,  respecting  the  limits  of  jurisdiction  possessed 
by  the  spiritaal  courts.    With  Venice,  where  the  power  of  tlie  state  was  held 
in  the  highest  esteem,  this  controversy  {)roceedcd  to  an  open  rupture  when  the 
pope  demanded  that  certain  clerg}'men  who  had  been  condemned  for  some 
capital  offences,  should  be  delivered  up  to  him,  and  that  a  law  should  be  re- 
pealed by  which  an  increase  of  the  property  of  the  Church  in  real  estate  was 
forbidden.    The  Venetian  senate  was  excommunicated  by  the  pope,  and  the 
territories  under  their  control  were  placed  under  an  interdict  (Ai>ril  17, 1606). 
The  papal  ban  was  declared  by  Venice  to  be  unjust,  and  therefore  void.    The 
Servite,  Paolo  Sarpi^  an  intelligent  and  highly  educated  man,  and  of  rigid 
Gfttholic  piety  with  respect  to  his  mode  of  life,  justified  the  republic  in  the 
eyes  of  foreign  nations,  and  quieted  the  minds  of  the  Venetian  people  by 
strengthening  a  consciousness  of  their  rights.    When  the  pope  therefore  saw 
that  his  interdict  was  despised,  and  that  Ferrara  was  in  peril,  he  was  obliged 
to  avail  himself  of  the  mediation  of  France  to  effect  a  peace,  leaving  the 
rights  of  the  republic  unimpaired  (1607).  (h)    He  was  more  successful  in 
laying  a  permanent  basis  for  the  wealth  of  his  own  family,  by  the  destruction 
of  the  unfortunate  house  of  Cenei,    Sarpi  was  included  in  the  stipulations  of 
the  peace,  and  although  well  acquainted  with  the  ordinary  practice  of  the 
Roman  curia,  he  continued  with  all  the  lawful  means  which  history  affords, 
to  protest,  like  another  Paul  withstanding  Peter,  against  the  arbitrary  aggres- 
sions of  the  pope  upon  the  liberties  of  the  Church  and  state  (d.  1023).  (c)    On 
the  other  hand  the  pope  had  himself  saluted  as  the  Vicar  of  God,  and  the 
valiant  preserver  of  the  papal  omnipotence,  (d)     Gregory  XV,  (Ludovisi, 
16Sl-2d),  who  always  lived  on  the  brink  of  the  grave,  gave  a  permanent 
form  to  the  rules  by  which  the  election  and  consecration  of  the  pope  should 


a)  Lettres  da  Card.  cTOwat.  Par.  1627.  f.  Amrt.  1732.  6  vols.    Lea  ambM»ades  da  Card,  au  PfT" 
«>«*  Par.  1623.  t—U  Wadding,  ViU  Clem.  VIII.  Rom.  1728.  4. 

2»)  Interdict!  VeneU  H.  aaet  Paulo  8arpi  ex  ital.  Cantabr.  1726.  4.    Contmr.  inter  P.  M.  et  Vene- 
tos  BfCta  et  scrr.  ex  Ital.    lu  villa  San  Vincentluna  1607. 

«■)  Opere  (with  hla  Vita  by  Fulffenzio).  Yen.  1677.  5  vols.  12.  GrUeinni  (Memorle  aDoddot«. 
^*^naL  into  Germ,  by  Le  Bret,  Ulm.  1761.)  del  genlo  dl  Fra  Paolo.  Yen.  17S5.  {Fontanini,  Storla 
■''casAdl  Fra  Paolo.  Yen.  1808.)  BlancM-Giovini,  Biogr.  dl  Fra  P.  Znri^.  1336.  2  voU  E.  M&ncK, 
I***  P.  SarpL  Carkr.  1889L 

*)  Bn)9ii  PaoloB  V  Borghesioa.  Bom.  1624. 


458  MODEBN  CnXTSCH  HISTORY.    PER.  Y.    A.  D.  1S17-16«L 

henceforth  he  condacted,  (e)  canonized  the  founders  of  the  order  of  the 
Jesuits,  whose  pupil  he  had  heen,  made  a  powerfnl  effort  to  maintain  the  Ger- 
man war,  and  received  the  Palatine  library  as  his  share  of  the  booty.  (/) 
Urban  VI I L  (Barberini,  1623-44),  although  folly  oonscions  of  his  eminent 
dignity  and  talents,  was  contented  with  the  prosecution  of  such  designs  as 
belonged  to  him  in  the  character  of  an  Italian  prince,  the  oonstmction  of  a 
few  forts,  and  the  conduct  of  an  inglorious  war  against  the  house  of  the  Far- 
nese.  For  a  while  his  policy  was  favorable  to  the  cause  of  the  Protestant 
powers,  and  the  rigid  Catholics  complained  that  the  pope  stood  as  cold  as  ioe 
in  the  midst  of  the  conflagration  of  churches  and  monasteries.  Bnt  he  pro- 
tested against  the  compulsory  concessions  made  at  the  treaty  of  Prague,  main- 
tained the  most  rigid  system  of  Catholicism,  and  gave  the  final  form  to  the 
bull  In  coenu  Domini  (p.  811),  in  which  nearly  all  the  claims  of  the  mediaeval 
hierarchy  are  advanced,  and  not  only  Saracens,  pirates,  and  prinoea  who  im- 
pose arbitrary  taxes,  but  Lutherans,  Zwinglians,  and  Calvinists,  were  anathe- 
matized, {g) 

%  887.    Law  and  Political  delations. 

It  was  principally  through  the  labors  of  some  learned  Jesuits  that  the 
ideas  of  the  middle  ages  were  now  reduced  to  a  regular  theocratic  system  of 
policy,  the  fundamental  principle  of  which  was  that  the  state  is  to  the  choroh 
what  the  body  is  to  the  soul.  It  was  contended  that  although  this  body  lives 
in  accordance  with  its  own  laws,  it  should  nevertheless  be  subservient  to  the 
great  objects  of  the  soul,  and  in  extreme  cases  should  be  sacrificed  for  the  sal- 
vation of  the  soul.  It  was  also  conceded  that  the  royal  power  is  not  derived 
from  the  pope,  and  is  not  subject  to  him,  and  yet  where  the  salvation  of  the 
soul  demands  such  a  sacrifice,  the  pope  has  a  right  to  depoee  even  kings,  and 
the  inquisition  is  authorized  to  take  away  their  Hves,  since  every  earthly 
power  loses  its  rights  when  they  are  abused  for  the  injury  of  religion.  Ac- 
cording to  this  system  the  sacerdotal  power  was  committed  to  a  distinct  order 
of  men  by  God,  and  the  royal  power  was  derived  from  the  people,  so  that 
the  advocates  of  this  system  carried  out  the  doctrine  of  the  sovereignty  of 
the  people  to  its  extreme  results,  (a)  Not  only  individual  Jesuits  taoght  that 
it  was  lawful  and  even  pleasing  to  God  to  slay  a  tyrannical  king,  but  even  the 
Sorbonne  decided  (1589)  that  the  French  people  ought  to  have  no  scruples 
of  conscience  in  taking  up  arms  against  their  king,  (b)  This  was,  it  is  true, 
intended  to  express  a  decision  on  a  particular  case,  and  was  directed  only 
against  those  kings  who  threatened  the  interests  of  Catholicism.  But  the 
majesty  of  even  Catholic  kings  was  made  to  depend  upon  religious  considera- 


f)  Ingoli.  Coeremonlale  ritas  electionlB  Bom.  Pont  Bom.  1621.   Z«fuu2oro,  B«Uiioa«  d«]l«  eortd 
di  Kotna.  Rom.  ed.  5.  1S24.  2  vols.  12. 

/)  A  ug.  Theiner,  8ch<>nkung  der  Heidelb.  BfbL  a.  Ibre  Yeneud.  ntoh  Bom.  Miknoh.  1844. 

g)  liuUar.  Hum.  vol.  IV.  p.  llSss.    Le  Bret  (jx  811.)  1.  8.  Tol.  2  «d.  1772.— iS  Simonim,  SylvM  Ui^ 
banUnae  &  gesta  Urb.  Antu.  1687. 

a)  J.  Mariana,  de  Kege  et  Bcgia  InadtatioDe  I  III.  Totot  1508.  &  often.    BeUarmi$t^  de 
tale  Snmmi  Pontif.  in  temporal.  Bom.  1610.  At  often.    SuareB,  Def.  fldel  oath.  adr.  ai^Ua 
rorea.  Conimb.  1613.  &  often. 

b)  Be^ponsam  facaltatis  tbeol  ParisienaiB.    (A.ddiUooa  an  Jonnial  da  H«iU7  IIL  ToL  L  pi  8170 


Cn^P.  YL    OATH.  CHTIRCH.    %  887.  LAW.    POLITICAL  BELATIONS.         459 

tions,  and  under  the  sway  of  a  king  whom  the  pope  had  approved,  this  same 
Sorbonne  condemned  the  very  doctrine  (1694)  which  had  produced  the  vio- 
lent death  of  two  kings  of  France,  (e)  Wherever  Protestantism  maintained  its 
existence  under  the  government  of  Catholic  princes,  the  power  of  the  sove- 
reign was  limited  hy  the  states,  but  no  sooner  did  Catholicism  obtain  the 
victory  than  he  was  freed  from  all  such  restraints.  In  Venice  a  system  of 
political  science  was  composed  without  reference  to  religious  creeds.  (fT) 
"When  Paul  IV.  pronounced  the  election  of  the  emperor  invalid,  because  it 
liad  been  held  without  his  mediation,  and  by  heretical  princes,  he  perceived 
that  the  Roman  authority  in  such  matters  was  despised  by  every  one  in  Ger- 
many, whether  belonging  to  the  new  or  to  the  old  religion,  (e)  and  the  imperial 
coronation  has  ever  since  been  a  high  festival,  which  in  the  view  of  the  na- 
tion had  no  relation  to  Rome.  The  popes  were  well  aware  that  their  cause 
oould  not  then  dispense  with  the  favor  of  the  princes ;  and  although  they  still 
derived  regular  revenues  from  the  appointment  of  ecclesiastical  offices,  in- 
stead of  drawing  money  from  the  princes,  these  princes  received  large  sums 
from  the  hand  of  the  popes.  By  such  subsidies  for  maintaining  the  contest 
against  the  Protestants,  and  by  numerous  gifts  for  the  establishment  of  rela- 
tives, the  debts  of  the  Roman  court  finally  became  so  enormous,  that  under 
Urban  VIII.  they  amounted  to  thirty  millions  of  scudi,  and  half  the  papal 
revenues  were  consumed  in  the  payment  of  the  interest.  (/)  This  burden, 
however,  by  an  artificial  system  of  finance  was  rendered  not  unacceptable  to 
many  wealthy  persons,  and  a  vast  influence  was  acquired,  since  it  now  be- 
came the  interest  of  independent  men  of  wealth  to  sustain  the  papacy.  The 
pope  looked  upon  himself  as  far  superior  to  any  council,  to  whose  decisions  he 
paid  deference  merely  from  his  own  free  grace.  He  maintained  that  even 
in  doubtful  matters  the  Church  was  bound  to  regard  him  as  infallible,  that  it 
might  not  act  against  conscience  when  going  against  his  decision,  (ff)  The 
appointment  of  nearly  all  prelates  depended  upon  the  will  of  the  princes,  and 
the  consent  of  the  pope.  It  was  in  the  German  bishoprics  that  the  influence 
of  the  emperor  was  the  least,  but  the  popes  generally  found  it  expedient  to 
consult  the  wishes  of  the  German  princes  in  the  appointment  of  their  younger 
sons.  In  the  new  form  of  their  oath  the  bishops  were  obliged  to  swear  obe- 
dience to  the  papacy  rather  than  to  the  Church,  and  that  they  would  perse- 
cute heretics  to  the  utmost  of  their  power,  (h)  In  most  of  the  principal 
cities  permanent  nunciatures  were  formed,  with  high  plenipotentiary  powers* 
that  through  them  the  influence  of  the  papacy  might  become  as  it  were  uni- 
▼ersal.    The  Gallican  Church  alone  kept  itself  aloof  from  these  agencies,  (t) 

e)  Argentre  (p.  851.)  vol.  II.  p.  4S4. 

ef)  Comp.  J.  0.  de  Jonge^  Nederland  en  Venetia  Oravonhag.  180^ 

«)  Dr.  Sfld  in  Ooldast  pol.  Roicbsh&ndL  toI.  Y.  p.  167. 

/)  Rnixk*^  Pilpste,  vol.  II L  p.  10«. 

g)  Pallnvicini,  XIII,  !«.  Le  Plat,  Monn.  ad  H.  0.  Trid.  toL  TI.  p.  SOeas.  SMarm,  de  Bom. 
Ptmt  IV,  5. 

h)  From  the  PontiJtcaU  Romanum,  Btimae  1605.  In  Elchhom,  KBeobt  vol.  I.  p.  OQtei — {RaU' 
imuh^uck)  Abh.  fL  d.  Eld,  welcben  die  dt  Biscbofe  abzalegen  baben.  Ylen.  1781. 

f)  (F.  V.  MoMr)  0«scb.  d.  NnnUen  In  DentaobL  Frkf:  17SS.  2  vols.  (Weidenfeld)  Entwickl.  d.  Dis- 
ptna-n.  NnntiatarstrelUgk.  (Bonn.)  178S.  4  L,  Snell,  Gescb.  d.  Einfubr.  d.  Xant  in  d.  Schwaii. 
Bad.  1847. 


460  MODERN  CHUBCH  UI8T0BT.    FEB.  Y.    A.  D.  UlT-16ia 

The  Roman  court  also  began  now  to  bestow  as  a  matter  of  grace,  and  for  a 
definite  period  (facnltates  qninqnennales),  especially  upon  the  German  bish- 
ops, the  right  to  grant,  as  the  missionary  interests  of  their  present  and  pro- 
spective dioceses  seemed  to  require  them,  dispensations  of  marriage,  and  ex- 
emptions A*om  Catholic  appointments,  (k) 

§  888.     Great  GJuinge  in  the  Character  of  Catholieism, 

In  the  struggle  then  going  forward  new  attacliments  for  the  Church  began 
to  be  developed,  and  the  hierarchy  discovered  that  their  salvation  depended 
principally  upon  religious  considerations.    Hence  some  of  the  worst  abuses  in 
the  admiuistration  of  the  Church  were  removed,  indulgences  were  no  longer 
exposed  for  sole,  (a)  it  was  found  to  be  useless  to  threaten  any  one  with  the 
papal  ban,  and  it  was  only  in  Rome  that  excommunication  was  sometimes 
resorted  to  as  an  assistance  to  the  police.    By  a  very  gradual  enforcement  of 
the  Tridentine  decrees,  the  clergy  were  compelled  to  live  respectable  lives. 
In  the  principal  sees  of  the  Church,  their  worldliness  was  now  exchanged  for 
a  solemn  and  imposing  splendor,  piety  generally  took  the  form  of  a  sentimen- 
tal devotion,  and  as  those  who  were  known  to  possess  it  had  reason  to  expect 
the  blessings  of  fortune  and  ecclesiastical  honors,  we  may  suppose  that  selfish 
views  and  artifice  were  sometimes  mingled  with  it.    That  which  had  for- 
merly been  done  in  the  Church  with  no  thought  of  opposition,  now  fire- 
quently  brought  upon  the  actors  a  high  degree  of  suspicion  and  persecution. 
The  same  clergy  to  whom  Gerson  had  once  been  a  leader,  now  reftised  to 
tolerate  Richer^  who  sought  to  find  in  the  liberties  of  the  Galilean  Church 
protection  for  not  only  the  rights  of  the  state,  but  also  for  those  of  the  gene* 
ral  Church,  which  he  claimed  to  be  subject  to  the  Son  of  God  as  its  only 
supreme  monarch.    He  was  compelled  to  recant  his  opinion  by  Richelieu^s 
assassins,  and  in  the  midst  of  his  persecutions  died  (1631).  (ft)     Galilei  (d. 
1688)  was  obliged  solemnly  to  retract  his  assertion  that  the  earth  moves 
around  the  sun.  (c)    The  Humanists  were  compelled  to  give  way  before  the 
inquisition,  and  the  enthusiasm  which  had  sprung  up  in  favor  of  antiquity 
was  unable  to  maintain  its  ground  against  the  rising  spirit  in  behalf  of  the 
Church.    The  instruction  of  youth  in  the  higher  departments  of  learning 
was  now  in  the  hands  of  the  Jesuits,  who  regulated  it  by  the  strictest  rules, 
gave  it  almost  exclusively  a  spiritual  direction,  and  confined  the  intellect 
within  certain  definite  limits.    From  a  dislike  to  the  universities,  the  hier- 
archy began  to  prefer  that  the  clergy  should  be  educated  in  episcopal  semi- 
naries.   The  control  which  the  inquisition  possessed  over  books  made  them 

k)  O.  Mej€r,  d  rum.  Curie.  (Richter  a.  Jaoobe.  Zeitsch.  £  Secht  n.  PoUt  d.  K.  1847.  p.  SlSa.) 
Hid,  Propaganda,  vol.  II.  p.  2108s. 

a)  C-«»mp.  Pfseheck,  klrchengescb.  MiscelL  (Zt?Itsch.  f.  List  Th.  1989.  P.  8.) 

b)  De  eco.  et  pel.  poteetate.  Par.  161L  and  oft  Apologia  pro  Oersonio,  denno  Lb  &  167a.  4. — 
BaiUeU  la  vio  d'Kdmond  Richer,  Doct  de  Sorbonne  Liege.  1714. 

c)  Paulas,  GaL  KampC  C  d.  Rationalism.  (Beitrr.  x.  Dognien-,  K.  n.  Re£.  Oesch.  1887.  p^  8248a.) 
Mohnike,  z.  Gesch.  QaL  (6tud.  a.  Krit  1882.  P.  1.  p.  845.)  Der  h.  Stahl  gegen  GaL  (Hist  poL  BL 
184L  vol.  YII.  P.  7-10.)  [Life  of  Gal.  in  Lib.  of  ITseful  KnowL  pp.  6S-61.  Lond.  188&  li.  Lifo  of 
GaL  Galilei,  Ac  Boston.  1S32. 12.  D.  BrewtUr,  Martyrs  of  Science^  Lond.  ISIL  &  Edinb.  Kev.  (In 
Eclectic  Mag.  Oct  1S41)  April,  1S44  Art  Martyrs  of  Science.] 


CHAP.  VL    CATH.  CHURCH.    $883.  FRANCIS  OF  8 ALESL    BORROMEO.        461 

more  powerful  in  Soathem  Europe  than  they  could  be  by  any  punishments 
they  could  inflict.  The  censorship  was  rendered  complete  by  the  index  of 
prohibited  books,  the  number  of  which  was  swelled  by  the  well-contested 
rivalry  between  the  Roman  and  the  Spanish  inquisitions  (after  1558).  The 
works  of  Catholic  and  classical  writers  were  given  to  the  world  in  mutilated 
editions.  Personal  solicitude  for  the  faith  and  ignorance  far  exceeded  the 
limits  which  the  necessities  of  Catholicism  required,  (d)  This  dread  of  intel- 
lectual activity  produced  a  passionate,  servile,  and  malignant  spirit  on  the 
part  of  the  hierarchy.  The  religion  of  the  common  people,  however,  still 
remained  sincere ;  and  although  persons  were  often  canonized  for  political  rea- 
sons, and  for  their  large  fees,  many  genuine  saints  were  found  in  the  humble 
walks  of  life.  Francis  of  Sidea^  Bishop  of  Geneva  (d.  1622),  by  the  popular 
cordiality  of  his  mysticism,  which  called  on  men  to  renounce  their  own  wills 
even  when  directed  to  beneficence,  and  by  an  earnestness  which  concerned 
itself  with  nothing  but  religion,  was  more  efficient  in  the  edification  of  be- 
lievers than  in  the  conversion  of  heretics.  (^)  The  Castilian  Theresa  (d. 
1582),  after  passing  through  many  temptations  to  worldly  pleasure,  and 
many  sufferings,  had  her  heart  pierced  as  it  were  with  the  arrows  of  divine 
love,  possessed  ineffable  enjoyments  during  her  seasons  of  ecstasy,  and  spent 
her  life  in  bringing  the  female  department  of  the  Carmelite  order  to  the 
severe  discipline  of  ancient  times.  (/)  Carlo  Borroineo  (d.  1687),  a  relative 
and  favorite  of  the  pope,  was  elevated  even  when  a  youth  to  the  see  of  St, 
Ambrose,  possessed  great  influence  in  the  papal  court,  and  at  the  Council  of 
Trent,  was  full  of  zeal  against  the  heretics  on  the  southern  declivities  of  the 
Alps,  although  he  relied  entirely  upon  the  power  of  the  divine  word.  By  his 
gentleness  and  strictness  he  bestowed  great  blessings  upon  his  native  province, 
and  his  lofty  fonn  appears  to  look  down  upon  it  even  now  in  the  act  of  bless- 
ing and  guarding  it.  (g)  But  even  that  older  form  of  Catholicism  which  had 
prevailed  in  the  time  of  the  Councils  of  Constance  and  Basle,  could  not  be 
entirely  extingmshed,  for  it  bore  a  prominent  part  in  the  religious  changes 
which  then  took  place,  and  in  the  reformations  conducted  by  the  partisans  of 
Catholicism.  The  former  tendency  was  represented  by  Henry  IV.,  and  the 
latter  by  Philip  II.,  not  on  account  of  the  accidental  qualities  which  be- 
longed to  the  character  of  those  individuals,  but  because  each  of  them  was 
like  the  summit  of  a  mountain,  the  most  prominent  among  his  people. 


d)  Index  expnrgAtorius.  Antu.  1571.  Arg.  1609.  Indices  librr.  prohlbitomm  ot  expargandor. 
1067.  and  others.  [The  Vatican  Index  Expnrg.  ed.  by  /?.  Gibbings^  DubL  1887.  12]  Dan.  Francm, 
Dcq.  de  Papist  indicc.  libb.  proh.  Lps.  l&sl  4.  Mendham^  The  literaty  policy  of  the  Cliarch  of 
Come  exhibittrd,  in  an  account  of  lior  damnatory  catalogues  or  indexes.  £<L  2.  Lond.  1880.  [This 
work  is  also  embraced  in  Jfend/unn's  Index  of  Pmh.  Boolcs,  by  order  of  Greg.  XVI.  L«>n(1.  1S40.] 

«)  OeuTres  de  8.  Fr.  de  Salfs^  Par.  1S34.  16  vols.  Baudry,  Suppl.  aux  wuvres.  Lyon.  1886. — 
Leben  ▼.  C.  A.  SaUs,  16»i  MarsoUUr,  1747.  Reneing,  1S1&    F.  U.  (Tub.  theoL  Quartalschr.  1342. 

P.  1.) 

/)  8chrr.  d.  b.  Ther.  t.  Jesn,  ed.  by  Gallu*  Schtoaby  Solzb.  ISSls.  6  vols.  Acta  8.  Ther.  ill.  a.  J. 
Vandtrmoere,  1846.  f. 

g)  0pp.  Milan.  1758.  6  vols.  f.  Oodeau,  la  vie  de  Ch.  B.  Par.  1747.  Sailer,  d.  h.  Karl  Aagsb. 
18S4  Giusaano,  Leben  d.  h.  K.  B.  trom  the  Ital.  r.  KUt^^  Aogsb.  1886s.  8  yoIs.  Dierengar,  d.  b. 
Bormn.  a.  d.  KYerbeaa.  sr.  Zeit  KOln.  1846. 


462  MODERN  CIIUBOn  HI8T0BT.    FEB.  Y.    A.  D.  1A1T-1M& 

§  880.    Fraternities  for  Instrttetum  and  Charity, 
Aubertl  Miraei  Begnlae  et  Constltt  Clerlcoram  in  oongregat  Tiventiom.  AAtv..l688L  4 

The  practice  of  orgaoizing  public  orders  had  been  fonnd  to  be  of  great 
importance  in  promoting  objects  of  general  utility  in  the  Church.  A  few 
Roman  prelates  associated  themselves  together  to  effect  a  reform  among  the 
clergy  (1524).  They  resolved  to  spend  their  time  in  the  performance  of 
pious  services,  not  for  reward,  nor  for  the  collection  of  alms,  but  depending 
on  such  voluntary  offerings  as  might  be  sent  them  by  Providence.  When 
one  of  their  number,  the  Bishop  of  Theate,  had  become  Pope  Paul  IV.,  these 
TheatincSy  in  the  capacity  of  preachers,  missionaries,  and  attendants  on  the 
sick,  became  almost  exclusively  a  seminary  in  which  the  superior  clergy  were 
trained,  (a)  Philip  of  Neri^  whose  peculiar  inclinations  led  him  to  spend  his 
days  in  churches  and  hospitals,  and  among  children,  and  his  nights  in  the 
catacombs,  formed  in  Rome  (1548)  a  fraternity  for  religious  duties,  and  rely- 
ing upon  the  assistance  of  God  and  of  pious  people,  he  erected  a  large  hospi- 
tal, in  the  oratory  of  which  (Oratorium)  books  of  a  devotional  character 
were  read  and  explained.  From  this  establishment  proceeded  the  FatherM  of 
the  Oratory^  an  association  of  clergymen  for  mutual  edification,  but  not 
bound  by  formal  vows.  The  French  Oratory  of  Jesus  was  a  similar  institu- 
tion established  for  the  reformation  of  the  clergy  (1611)  by  Peter  de  Berulle^ 
a  man  who  in  an  elevated  earthly  position  sought  to  attain  the  extreme  per- 
fection which  belongs  not  to  this  world,  {b)  After  the  publication  of  the 
decree  of  the  Council  of  Trent,  requiring  all  independent  monasteries  to 
nnite  themselves  into  congregations  for  mutual  supervision,  a  few  French 
monasteries  formed  an  association  (after  1618)  for  the  restoration  of  the  rule 
of  St.  Benedict,  and  with  this  congregation  most  of  the  French  Benedictines 
became  connected,  in  compliance  with  the  expressed  wishes  of  Cardinal 
Richelieu.  This  society,  which  received  the  name  of  St,  Maurus^  a  disciple 
of  Benedict,  devoted  its  efforts  to  the  instruction  of  youth  and  the  advance- 
ment of  solid  learning.  The  Fathers  of  the  Oratory  soon  after  directed  their 
exertions  in  the  same  channel.  Both  orders,  in  consequence  of  the  leisure 
and  freedom  from  care  which  they  afforded  to  their  learned  men,  and  the 
combination  of  various  powers  which  they  could  effect,  have  accomplished 
immense  benefits  for  the  cause  of  historical  learning.  Among  their  members 
were  found  some  whose  names  have  been  renowned  in  the  literary  world, 
and  who  for  their  literary  success  and  zeal  have  been  models  for  all  succeed- 
ing ages,  (r)  Among  the  Minorites,  the  popular  character  of  a  mendicant 
order  was  revised  (1528)  by  Matteo  de  Bassi,  apparently  for  no  other  purpose 
than  to  restore  the  genuine  costume  of  St.  Francis.    Even  the  old  spirit  of 

a)  CoJ.  Thienaei  Vita  Col  1612.  (AcU  63.  Aog.  toL  IL  p.  249.) 

h)  Bitron.  Ann.  ad  a.  57.  N.  162.  Inntitata  Congreg.  Bom.  1612.  A.  Galloniu*^  Tito  P.  KerlL 
Mog.  1602.  Ifabert  ds  CerUy,  Yio  da  Card.  BeroUe.  Par.  1646^  4  TabarauA,  H.  d«  P.  de  Ber. 
Par.  1817.  2  vols. 

c)  Constitt  pro  directlunc  reglminis  Congr.  6.  UaarL  Par.  1646.  {naudiqu4r)  U.  do  t^o.  dom. 
Didler  de  la  Coiir,  Kufurinatear  dee  B^n.  Par.  1772.— (TViaHn,  H.  lit  da  la  oongr.  de  8.  Ifaar.  Par. 
1726.  4.  Brux.  1770.  4.  with  Anin.  (v.  Meti9el)  Frkt  u.  K  ITTSa.  8  votai  J.  (?.  Otrhtt:  Verdieiistd 
d.  Maurlner  um  die  Win.  (TQb.  Quartolschr.  188&  P.  1&)  Die  liter.  Lditangen  d.  Fram.  OnL 
(Tab.  Quartalscbr.  183&.  P.  a) 


CHAP.  YL    CATIL  OHUBCH.    %  889.  CAPUCHINS.    UBSULINES.  463 

the  Franoisoans  was  aronsed.  Oeehino^  the  vicar-general  of  the  order,  and  a 
preacher  of  repentan<3e  in  Italy,  having  vainly  endeavored  to  satisfy  his  mind 
by  self-denials,  whose  ansterity  continually  became  more  severe,  finally  went 
over  to  the  Protestants  (1542),  and  even  beyond  them  in  their  peculiar  doc- 
trines. The  Capuchins,  however,  cdhtinued  to  show  a  spirit,  prepared  for 
the  boldest  sacrifices,  for  the  cultivation  and  employment  of  which  the  Rom- 
ish Church  offers  snob  facilities.  They  were  now  also  furnished  with  a  gene- 
ral exclusively  for  their  order  (1619).  (d)  Angela  of  Breccia  (d.  1540),  one  of 
those  souls  which  move  on  earth  as  angels  of  consolation,  established  in 
honor  of  St.  Ursula  an  order  of  virgins  devoted  to  acts  of  charity  and  kind- 
ness in  the  domestic  circle.  The  Ursulines  also  became  subject  to  a  monastic 
constitotion  (1612),  and  undertook  tlie  education  of  children  of  their  own 
sex.  Francis  of  Sales,  by  the  agency  of  his  friend  Francisca  of  Chantaly  so 
remarkable  for  her  vigorous  and  glowing  heart,  founded  the  order  of  the 
Vititants  (1610-18,  Ordo  de  visitatione  Mariae  Virginis),  which  thought  that 
in  the  visitation  of  the  Blessed  Virgin  might  be  found  a  type  of  the  manner 
in  which  all  virgin  eouIs  should  wait  for  the  visit  of  their  heavenly  spouse. 
The  PiaruU^  founded  by  Joseph  Calasanza  (d.  1648),  a  Spaniard  then  resid- 
ing at  Rome,  soon  became  the  rivals  of  the  Jesuits  as  the  fathers  of  the 
rdigions  schools,  (e)  John  di  Dio  (d.  1550),  a  poor  man  and  a  native  of  Por- 
togal,  was  constrained  by  Yna  sympathy  for  the  distressed  to  found  an  order 
ibr  the  relief  of  such  as  were  sick  and  poor,  without  regard  to  differences  of 
£iith.  Its  members  were  known  in  Spain  as  Brethren  of  Hospitality,  in 
France  as  Brethren  of  Christian  Love,  and  in  Germany  as  the  Brethren  of 
Mercy.  Vincent  de  Paula^  by  birth  belonging  to  the  common  people,  at  one 
time  a  slave  in  Tunis,  and  a  man  who  sympathized  with  all  the  iUs  to  which 
the  homan  soul  or  body  is  subject,  founded  (1624)  the  congregation  of  the 
JMmU  of  the  Mission  (Lazarists),  the  object  of  which  was  to  convey  Chris- 
tianity with  all  its  blessings  to  the  neglected  classes  of  Cliristendom,  and  at 
the  same  time  to  constitute  a  school  friendly  to  the  Jesuits,  and  for  the  im- 
provement of  the  French  clergy.  While  a  confessor  for  the  widow  Le  Qras^ 
lie  also  instituted  the  society  of  the  Sisters  of  Mercy  (Filles  de  la  charity, 
grises),  into  whose  gentle  hands  the  French  people  have  comniittcd  the  care 
ci  their  sick  and  poor.  (/)  In  connection  with  these  various  societies  may 
also  be  mentioned  those  associations  of  brethren  and  sisters  to  which  per- 
sons of  all  classes,  especially  in  the  Italian  cities,  belong,  who  still  remained 
in  the  ordinary  walks  of  secular  life,  but  according  to  a  prescribed  rule  suc- 
cessively and  generally  in  a  deep  disguise,  from  no  motive  but  a  regard  for 
the  will  of  God  perform  all  needfhl  ofiiccs  for  pilgrims,  the  sick  and  the  dead. 


d)  AeU  S8.  Maj.  vol.  IV.  p.  2S368.  BoveHo,  Ann.  Ord.  Mfn.  qui  C«poclnt,  etc.  Lugd.  B.  1688m. 
8  Tola,  t  M.a  Tugio,  Bullar.  O.  Capp.  Rom.  1740fl&  7  voK  f.—Ocehino,  Dialog!  XXX.  Btt.  IMS. 
IfcCrie,  Hiat  of  R«f.  in  It  p.  ISAk).  8628S.     Trechsel,  L.  SozinL  p.  2'>B8.  202ss. 

O  {Senferl)  Ordensregeln  d.  Piaristcn.  Hal.  1783.  2  Tola. 

/)  Leben  d.  H.  Vine  by  AbMy,  Par.  1664  CuU^  Nancy.  1748.  Stdberg,  2  ed.  Vienna.  181». 
Sdkmi4cUr.  (Et.  K.  Z.  1S82.  N.  778S.)  Ortlni,  Par.  1S42.  OahlUon,  Vie  de  M.  do  Oras.  Par. 
1S76L  (Clemena  Brentano)  Die  barm.  Schwestem  in  Bczug  a.  Armen-  u.  Krankenpf.  Cobl.  1S81. 
Oompk  Et.  K.  Z.  188a  N.  22«.  188&  N.  18«.  FUisehmann,  d.  Wirkcn  d.  barmh.  Sohw.  In  Wien. 
Vltuia.  1888L 


464  MODERN  CUUBCII  HISTORY.    PEa  V.    A.  D.  1517-1C4& 

§  390.     The  Fine  Arts. 

Literatare  in  $  2(>7.  Kugler^  Oesch.  <1.  M»].  toL  II.  Olareanu*^  Dodecachordon.  Bu.  1517. 
Gerbfri^  de  cantu  et  maidca.  8.  Bias.  1774  S  voDi.  4.  JioohlUt^  OrundliDl^n  za  e.  Oeseb.  d.  O** 
aangsmua.  f.  Kircbe,  Ac.  (F&r.  Freande  d.  Tank.  toL  IV.  Lps.  1882.)  KU9W€Uer^  Oeach.  d.  oar. 
abendl.  Maslk.  Lps^  (1884.)  1S47.  4  • 

It  has  been  the  interest  of  the  Catholics  of  modem  times  to  favor  the 
arts.  Tlic  imitative  arts  had  however,  at  this  time,  reached  the  highest  point 
to  which  tliey  were  destined  to  rise,  and  the  unrestrained  power  of  genius 
found  no  motives  to  return  to  its  efforts  in  that  direction.  Correggio^  with 
an  overflowing  heart  and  a  magic  richness  of  coloring,  and  Titian^  with  all 
the  splendors  of  nature  itself,  painted  also  scenes  from  sacred  history,  (a) 
Both  of  them,  however,  did  homage  without  restraint  at  the  altar  of  senso- 
ous  beauty.  The  revival  of  art  in  the  school  of  Bologna  was  influenced 
indeed  by  anatomical  studies  and  learned  attempts  to  imitate  antique  models, 
and  yet  it  was  pervaded  by  the  ecclesiastical  spirit.  The  noble  Caraeei  ¥rith 
his  bold  grandeur,  Domcnichino  with  his  gloomy  fervor,  and  Guide  Beni 
with  his  enthusiostio  earnestness,  presented  to  the  world  the  conceptions  and 
forms  of  the  Church,  while  PouMin  painted  not  only  the  ancient  marble 
figures  as  saints,  but  even  landscapes  seriously  and  solemnly  as  if  they  had 
been  for  a  divine  temple.  The  hardy  natural  simplicity  of  the  Netherlandic, 
and  the  yet  unbroken  enthusiasm  of  the  Spanish  national  character,  raised 
the  imitative  arts  of  the  17th  century  to  the  brilliant  eminence  which  they 
had  formerly  attained :  Ruhcns  made  use  of  sacred  things  to  represent  most 
skilfully  the  energy  of  passion  and  an  exuberant  sensuous  life,  in  his  eflfort 
to  adorn  the  sepulchral  chnpcl  of  his  family ;  and  Murillo^  the  painter  of  the 
Catholic  faith,  and  yet  distinguished  for  his  spirited  conformity  to  nature, 
presents  even  those  sacred  things  which  he  adored  with  rapturous  devotion 
sometimes  in  the  most  natural  attractic^s  and  sometimes  in  the  most  un- 
earthly and  fanatical  forms.  The  plastic  arts  sought  to  renew  their  infiuiey 
by  waxlike  imitations  of  the  ungraceful  forms  of  nature.  By  such  means, 
Bernini  with  astonishing  skill  destroyed  the  taste  of  his  contemporaries,  and 
the  Christian  character  of  these  arts.  It  was  at  such  a  period  that  a  Batbe' 
rini,  then  on  the  papal  throne,  thought  he  could  add  to  his  reputation  by  dis- 
figuring the  Pantheon,  which  he  despoiled  of  the  ornaments  which  had 
been  spared  by  so  many  barbarians,  that  he  might  oast  them  (1632)  into  can- 
nons and  an  ill-contrived  high  altar  for  the  church  of  St.  Peter.  The  poetry 
of  Italy  was  generally  tedious  and  of  a  moralizing  strain,  until  Torqnato 
Tdsso  (d.  1595),  a  genuine  poet,  though  slightly  addicted  to  the  same  style, 
celebrated  the  great  change  which  had  recently  taken  place  in  Catholicism  in 
his  account  of  the  exploits  of  the  middle  ages,  (h)  Borne  on  by  the  medi- 
aeval spirit  which  still  survived  among  his  people,  Calderan  (d.  1687),  in  hi» 
sacred  plays  for  festive  seasons  (p.  802),  has  brought  forward  the  mysteries 
of  Christianity  in  a  poetic  dress,  and  celebrated  Christian  heroism  and  all 


[a)  A  life  of  Corrcgglo  and  Parmeg.  Lond.  1828.  S.  J.  NorihcoU,  Lift)  of  TltUn.  Lend.  1890 
2  vols.  8.] 

[6)  R.  Milman,  Life  of  Taaso.  New  ed.  Lond.  1882.  2  vols.  8.  SUmondi^  H.  of  Lit  toI  L 
p.  27788.] 


CHAP.  YL    CATH.  CHURCH.    1 890.  PALESTBIKA.    ALLE6BI.    KSBL       465 

that  then  remaiDed  of  it  as  in  a  waking  dream,  (c)   Modern  mnsic  first  attained 
the  character  of  an  art  by  which  the  devont  heart  gives  utterance  to  its  emo- 
tions, in  the  Church  of  the  fourtecntii  century  in  the  Netherlands.    Its  style 
was  at  Uiat  time  serious,  grand,  and  full  of  expression  only  when  taken  as  a 
whole ;  and  as  the  Church  would  not  renounce  the  few  melodies  which  had 
long  been  used,  art  was  obliged  to  exert  its  powers  on  the  harmonies  by 
which  they  were  embellii^hed.    The  consequence  was  that  many  imitators 
adopted  an  artificial,  dry,  and  learned  kind  of  music,  which  derived  all  its 
life  from  some  secular  airs  mingled  with  them,  (d)    The  Synod  of  Trent  en- 
treated the  pope  that  he  would  devise  some  plan  by  which  this  state  of  things 
might  be  improved.     Marcellus  II.  accordingly  disclosed  his  views  to  an 
enthusiastic  young  man,  and  soon  after  under  the  papacy  of  Paul  IV.,  Fala- 
trina  presented  to  the  world  his  jUwki  Marcelli  (1555).     This  was  the 
commencemeut  of  a  revolution  in  sacred  music,  which  by  his  influence  be- 
came simple,  thoughtful,  aspiring,  sincere,  and  noble,  but  destitute  of  pas- 
sion and  tenderness.  (<)    The  most  spiritual  of  all  arts,  it  raised  the  heart 
into  immediate  communion  with   the  infinite,  and  while  celebrating  the 
mystery  of  the  divine  sacrifice  in  the  difierent  parts  of  the  Mass  to  which 
it  ftspecially  was  set,  it  found  opportunity  to  express,  and  to  elevate  by  its 
Tarious  combinations  of  sounds,  every  kind  of  Christian  feeling.    The  centre 
of  this  school  was  the  papal  chapel,  and  its  last  creative  master  was  Gregorio 
JLUegri  (d.  1652),  whose  Miserere,  composed  for  a  double  choir,  expresses 
iHrith  wonderful  simplicity  all  the  calm  and  profound  sufferings  of  a  Christian 
lieart  beneath  the  Saviour^s  cross.  {/)    The  Opera  was  invented  (about  1600) 
l)y  certain  persons  belonging  to  the  Academy  of  the  Medici,  while  attempting 
in  an  antique  style  to  represent  the  ancient  drama.    This  secular  yet  serious 
mnd  dignified  style  of  music  delighted  all  classes.    While  the  old  ecclesiasti- 
oal  style  was  struggling  in  Kome  to  maintain  its  ground  against  this  inno- 
iration,  the  school  of  music  founded  by  Neri  began  to  perform  in  the  orato- 
riam  pieces  relating  to  subjects  from  sacred  history.    In  this  way  came  into 
ezislence  the  Oratorio^  intermediate  between  the  ancient  and  modem  styles 
of  music,  and  more  distinctly  expressive  of  precise  characters  and  situations, 
mere  agreeable  in  its  melodies,  and  richer  in  its  instrumental  accompani- 
ments, (j^) 

§  891.     T7u  Sdcred  Scriptures,     Cont.  from  §  286,  886. 

The  Complutensian  Polyglott  was  followed  by  other  similar  attempts  of  a 
literary  character,  with  the  aid  of  a  larger  number  of  ancient  versions.  The 
Greek  text  by  Robert  Stephens  (Estienne),  (a)  and  after  him,  almost  acciden- 
^7)  the  beautiful  impressions  from  the  office  of  the  Elzevirs,  (/>)  on  the  basis 
^the  edition  of  Erasmus  or  of  the  Complutensian  Polyglott,  were  now 
^Mished  as  an  article  of  faith  in  both  Churches  (Textus  receptus).    Many 

r«)  nu.  vol.  IL  p.  816a.]       d)  ManH  vol  XXIX.  p.  107. 

«)  ^uini,  Mtftnorie  della  ^iUdl  O.  P.  da  Palcat  Kom.  1823.  2  vol*,  i. 

•^  'A^  WUmtuiny  Q.  d.  in  d.  piipsU.  Kapelle  Qbl.  Litnrgle  d.  stUlen  Wocbe.  A.  d.  EngL  r.  Aztnger. 

184a    [The  OfBoea  of  Holy  Week.  Lond.  Svo.] 
rt  ^ink  In  ZeitBch.  t  hUt  TU.  1S42.  H.  Z. 
^)  t*«r.  1U«.  16.    EspeciaUj  155a  t  (ed.  regliuL)       I)  Lagd.  a  1624.  U  and  oft. 

80 


466  MODERN  CnUBCH  niSTORT.  PER.  Y.    A.  D.  161T-1648L 

also  attempted  to  expound  the  Scriptures,  but  with  no  peculiarities  of  thdr 
own,  they  generally  depended  wholly  either  upon  Erasmus  or  the  fathers. 
Not  only  were  the  views  of  divine  inspiration  entertained  by  the  ancient 
Church  expressly  disregarded  by  the  Jesuits  of  the  Netherlands  (after  1585), 
but  even  the  statements  and  ordinary  intelligence  of  the  Scriptural  writers 
were  impeached.  The  shock  which  the  Protestantism  of  that  period  received 
from  such  expressions,  encouraged  many  men  to  make  known  the  more 
recent  results  of  the  scientific  studies  of  a  liberal  school,  (c)  Luther^s  Bible 
was  extensively  circulated  under  the  name  of  his  eqemies.  (d)  After  many 
animated  discussions  in  the  Synod  of  Trent,  the  object  of  which  was  to  avoid 
all  dependence  upon  grammarians,  and  to  secure  themselves  from  the  attacks 
of  Protestants,  the  Vulgate  was  declared  to  be  authentic  for  all  sermons 
and  expositions  of  Scripture.  This  ambiguous  decision  has  been  explained 
by  learned  Catholics  generally  to  mean  simply  that  this  translation  was  pre- 
ferable to  all  others.  (<?)  Such  a  decree,  however,  never  became  effectual, 
until  in  an  official  edition  the  various  and  corrupt  readings  of  this  version 
were  partially  removed.  Sixtus  V.  took  charge  of  this  work  (1590),  and  by 
virtue  of  his  plenary  apostolic  power  pronounced  it  authentic  and  unchange- 
able. From  the  haste,  however,  with  which  it  had  been  accomplished,  it 
soon  became  necessary  that  a  new  edition  with  important  emendations  should 
be  prepared  under  the  authority  of  Clement  VII L  (1592).  The  merit  of  hav- 
ing perceived  these,  and  of  making  improvements  with  regard  to  some  other 
errors  in  the  work,  was  not  readily  acknowledged  by  Protestants,  but  al) 
were  convinced  that  such  measures  were  infallible  in  matters  of  faith.  (/) 

§  892.    Laws  Respecting  Doctrines  and  Internal  Theological  Cantrotersiet. 

The  doctrinal  decrees  of  the  Synod  of  Trent,  the  partial  vagueness  of 
which  was  doubtless  a  matter  of  design,  were  generally  acknowledged  to  be 
the  standard  of  Catholic  orthodoxy.  The  phraseology  used  in  the  Fro/essio 
Fidci  Tridentina^  a  confession  published  by  Pius  IV.  (1564),  and  intended  to 
be  binding  upon  all  candidates  for  the  clerical  office  or  for  academical  honors, 
was  strictly  conformed  to  the  language  used  in  those  decrees,  {a)  Pius  V, 
published  the  Catechistnus  Romanus  (1566),  not  so  much  for  popnlnr  instruc- 
tion as  for  the  direction  of  pastors  while  engaged  in  that  work.  Both  these 
creeds  presented  some  of  the  doctrines  of  the  Tridentine  articles  in  a  more 
definite  form,  and  although  they  have  been  opposed  in  some  quarters,  they 
have  in  practice  been  received  as  authority.  The  essential  nature  of  Protes- 
tantism was  assailed  by  the  Synod  of  Trent  only  so  far  as  the  interpretation 
of  the  Scriptures  was  made  to  depend  upon  the  decision  of  the  Church,  and 

c)  Rich.  Simon,  Hist  crlL  du  tcxte  da  N.  T.  c.  88. 

d)  (  Wiilch  voL  XXL  p.  811.)  N.  T.  by  Emser,  Lp&  1527.  H.  8.  bj  Bletenberger,  Meotx.  ISM. 
by  Eck.  Ingolst  1587.— <?.  W.  Panx€r,  Qesch.  d.  rGm.  kath.  dt  Blbeiabem  Kfinib.  1781.  4 

€)  8e.<w.  IV.  Deer.  2.  [Landon,  Man  of  Councils,  p.  607.] — L.  v.  Eaa.  Docturam  eath.  Tridentinl 
circa  Viilg.  decroti  sensum  tostantiam  Hist  Salisb.  1816w  QraU,  1L  d.  Grftnxen  d.  Frelh.  la  £rU.  d. 
U.  8.  Ellw.  1817. 

/)  Tfu  JarM9,  Bellam  papale  s.  concordla  disoors  SIxU  V.  et  Clem.  YIIL  Lood.  0900.  4.)  16S8. 
[Jame«,  Ou  the  Cormptions  of  Scripture,  Councils  and  Fathers  (Locd.  1848^  8  ad.)  p.  ITlacv] 
Schoelhom,  Amoenn.  P.  IV.  p.  48889. 

a)  Q.  a  F.  MbhniJU^  urk.  Qeecb.  d.  Pro£  Fidel  Trtd.  Greiftw.  ISttL 


CHAP.  YI.  OATS.  OHUSCH.  f  893.  THEOLOGY.  GONTBOYEBSIES.    467 

the  anthority  of  tradition  is  made  equivalent  to  tliat  of  the  Scriptures.  The 
most  important  principle  it  proposed  in  opposition  to  the  Protestantism  of 
that  period,  was  one  which  referred  to  the  doctrine  of  justification.  Even 
among  the  prelates  themselves  there  was  a  pious  and  respectable  party  favor- 
able to  the  views  of  the  Protestants  on  this  subject,  (h)  Hence,  after  pro- 
tracted debates,  justification  was  declared  to  be  a  gracious  state  prepared  for 
by  tlie  Holy  Ghost  and  the  co-operation  of  the  sinner  himself,  and  is  essen- 
tiaUy  advanced  by  works  performed  in  obedience  to  the  Ohurch.  Hence  the 
doctrine  which  declared  that  man  is  justified  only  by  a  faith  wrought  wholly 
by  God,  could  be  condemned  with  much  consistency,  (c)  The  dispute  be- 
tween the  Thomists  and  the  Scotists  on  the  subject  of  original  sin  and  divine 
grace,  was  not  and  could  not  be  decided  at  that  time,  since  the  controversy 
maintained  by  those  schools  had  now  become  a  controversy  between  the  two 
orders  of  mendicant  friars,  and  the  deviation  of  the  whole  Church  from  the 
principles  of  Augostinism  rendered  it  indispensable  that  indefinite  forms  of 
expression  should  be  used.  But  when  the  efiTorts  of  Protestants  had  suc- 
ceeded in  directing  the  thoaghts  of  the  Church  toward  these  delicate  points, 
and  the  Jesuits,  in  consistency  with  the  moral  system  of  their  school,  had 
adopted  the  views  of  the  Scotists,  the  dangerous  proximity  of  this  dispute  to 
the  dread  abyss  of  Protestantism  could  not  deter  men  from  engaging  in  it  in 
many  ways.  The  Franciscans  succeeded  in  obtaining  a  damnatory  bull  of 
Pins  V.  (1567),  which  was  afterwards  confirmed  by  Gregory  XHI.  (1579), 
upon  seventy-nine  dangerous  propositions  extracted  from  the  writings  of 
BajfiB^  a  professor  of  Lou  vain,  who  had  abandoned  scholasticism  and  had 
tamed  his  attention  to  a  scriptural  and  Augustinian  Chrbtianity.  (d)  This  de- 
cree, however,  never  affected  his  personal  standing  in  the  Church.  The 
theological  faculty  of  Louvain  defended  themselves  by  an  aggressive  move- 
ment (after  1587),  and  condemned  thirty-four  propositions  opposed  to  the 
essential  doctrines  of  Augustine,  and  to  the  absolute  authority  of  the  Scrip- 
tores,  from  the  writings  of  the  Jesuits  Less  and  Hamel,  Sixtus  V.  endeavored 
to  allay  the  growing  strife  by  an  absolute  command  that  each  party  should 
cease  agitating  the  subject  (1588).  But  a  general  controversy  between  the 
rival  schools  of  the  Dominicans  and  the  Jesuits  had  already  commenced  in 
Spain  in  consequence  of  a  Pelagian  work  intended  as  conciliatory  by  the 
Jesuit  Molina,  (e)  Pressed  by  complaints  from  all  parties,  Clement  VIH. 
called  together  a  congregation  (1597)  for  the  full  decision  of  the  question, 
^  In  what  way  is  the  assistance  of  divine  grace  concerned  in  the  conversion 
of  the  dnner  ?  "  When  both  parties  had  submitted  their  respective  views  in 
the  most  circumstantial  manner  before  this  tribunal,  Paul  V.  dismissed  (1G07) 
tlie  congregation,  worn  out  by  protracted  labors,  with  the  promise  that  a  de- 
cision should  be  given  as  soon  as  convenient,  and  commanded  both  parties  to 
maintain  perpetual  silence  on  the  subject.  (/) 

&)  Ranks,  Pflfttte,  vol  L  p.  19998. 160sa. 
e)  8«tiL  TL  Deer,  de  JostUl  [Landon^  p.  610.] 

d^  Baji  0pp.  Ck>L  1696.  4    Da  Chetne^  II.  du  Bajanlrane.  Donay,  1781.  4. 
e)  Liberi  *rb.  e.  gntUe  donis,  dlv.  pneeclentia,  praedest.  et  reprobat  coDcordia.  OIjsslp.  1588L 
Anto.  159ft.  4 

/)  Amg,  U  BUinc  ijkrry\  H.  congreg.  de  aaxllils  gntlae.  Ant  1709.  t 


468  MODEBN  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  ▼.    A.  D.  1517-1M8L 

§  893.    Efforts  at  Reconciliation^  and  Controterties  with  the  Protestants. 

C.  W.  Hering^  Qoscfa.  d.  kircbl.  UnlonBverancfae.  Lpz.  1886-8.  2  vols. 

Even  wlien  the  popes  began  to  despair  of  victory,  they  would  admit  of 
no  compromise  with  the  Protestants  for  fear  that  the  whole  Church  might 
thereby  become  infected  with  the  spirit  of  the  Reformation,  (a)  Bnt  as  the 
Protestant  Chnrch  had  gone  in  some  respects  to  an  extreme,  and  as  the 
Catholic  Church  still  needed  reform,  and  as  the  former  appeared  only  another 
form  of  the  latter,  a  hope  was  entertained  that  a  reconciliation  might  be 
effected  which  would  be  eminently  beneficial  to  both  parties.  With  this 
view  Ferdinand  I.  requested  two  learned  men  whose  feelings  were  friendly  to 
the  object,  to  draw  up  articles  of  accommodation  and  agreement.  Cassander^ 
always  an  apostle  of  peace,  conceded  that  the  Scriptures  were  the  only  au- 
thority for  proving  any  doctrine,  and  thought  that  he  might  find  a  point  of 
agreement  for  the  one-sided  views  of  botli  parties  in  the  doctrine  of  justifi- 
cation by  faith  and  works.  He  was  anxioDs  to  preserve  the  hierarchy,  but 
was  willing  to  give  up  its  abuses,  together  with  a  multitude  of  evils  which 
had  grown  up  in  a  long  course  of  time,  or  things  which,  like  oelibaoy,  had 
once  been  beneficial,  but  were  now  antiquated.  Wizel^  when  a  youth,  had 
been  a  zealous  preacher  of  the  Lutheran  gospel,  which,  however,  he  re- 
nounced (1581),  because  he  regarded  its  doctrine  of  justification  as  injurious 
to  Christian  practice,  and  he  was  anxious  to  preach  nothing  but  the  goepel 
of  Christ.  He  afterwards  preached  as  a  priest,  though  married,  in  the  for- 
saken Church  at  Eisleben,  in  behalf  of  the  Catholic  cause,  and  with  many 
complaints  against  Luther.  At  a  still  later  period  he  sat  in  a  council  of 
Catholic  prelates,  in  which  he  still  clung  firmly  to  the  hope  that  by  follow- 
ing the  path  which  Erasmus  had  pursued,  renouncing  all  scholastic  subtleties 
and  papal  abuses,  by  purifying  the  Church  and  returning  to  the  Scriptures, 
all  Christendom  might  once  more  become  united  around  its  common  Lord 
Christ,  (b)  But  although  at  these  religious  conferences  an  agreement  often 
seemed  just  at  hand,  and  failed  only  because  of  the  obstinacy  of  some  indiyid- 
uals,  it  was  evident  from  the  peculiar  nature  and  historical  neoessity  of  such  a 
religion  as  Protestantism,  that  all  these  negotiations  must  fail.  In  the  Grer- 
man  conferences  the  principal  topics  of  discussion  were  original  rin  and  jus- 
tification, though  after  the  Synod  of  Trent  the  subject  of  the  sole  authority 
of  the  Scriptures  was  most  prominent.  The  Protestants  reproached  the 
Catholics  with  having  departed  from  the  Scriptures  and  from  Christ,  and  the 
Catholics,  on  the  other  hand,  reproached  the  Protestants  with  haTing  de- 
parted from  the  Church,  with  being  revolutionary  in  their  tendencies,  and 
yet  contending  that  the  wUl  was  not  free,  and  with  being  afraid  of  good 
works.  Catholicism  was  assailed  in  the  most  earnest  manner  by  Chemnits^ 
and  Protestantism  by  Bella r mine,  (c)     The  principal  subjects  debated  by 

a)  Comi).  Wiuaenberg,  Klrchenwen.  vol  IIL  p.  19S6S.  p.  895u 

h)  G.  Cau^  de  artic  reL  inter  Catbolicos  et  ProtesUntes  oontrovenU  «d  Ferd.  L  et  Max.  IL  Coo- 
saltatio.  CoL  1566.  ed.  If.  Grotius,  Lugd.  1648.  G.  Fitf.  Tla  regto.  CoL  (about)  1064.  ed.  OmWii^, 
Holmst  1650.  4  Bulb :  ed.  Conring,  Helmst,  1669.  L—StrobO^  Beltrr.  vol  IL  St  Iil  A.  JTtand^, 
de  O.  Tlcella  Ber.  1889.  4    Also  his  Das  Eine  n.  Mannieht  d.  ohr.  Leben.  Brl  1S40.  jk  ICTia. 

e)  Ch&mniM  Examen  ConcUii  Trid.  1669sfli  4  Tolflw  e±  G,  C  JoannU,  Fre£  1707.  £  and  oltan. 
BeUartnini  Dap.  de  oontror.  ohr.  fldei  adr.  hi^aa  temp,  haerettooiw  Bom.  1061«i  8  Tobb  t  and  oftao. 


CHAP.  VL  CATH.  CHURCH.  $  8M.  ATTEMPTS  AT  UNION.       469 

these  able  disputants,  however,  were  particular  doctrines  and  nsagos.  The 
authorities  to  which  the  Protestant  appealed  were  generally  the  literal  mean- 
ing of  the  Scriptures  and  facts  in  the  past  history  of  the  Church,  to  which 
the  Catholic  usually  replied  by  appealing  to  the  reasonable  fitness  of  things 
and  primitive  usage.  Flacivs  and  Gerhard  delighted  in  pointing  out  traces 
of  Protestantism  in  former  times,  that  so  they  might  overcome  the  Catholic 
Church  with  its  own  weapons,  (d)  Zealous  partisans,  like  liihus^  soon  dis- 
posed of  the  whole  subject  by  contending  that  the  party  which  could  show 
s  prescriptive  right  of  possession  should  be  victorious,  {e)  The  doctrine  of 
the  Lord^s  Supper,  as  it  was  maintained  in  both  Churches,  gave  much  occasion 
on  account  of  its  supernatural  sensuousness,  on  the  one  side  to  ridicule  for 
the  scholastic  subtilty  of  its  form,  (/)  and  on  the  other  to  a  rude  kind  of  poetry 
for  its  strange  figurative  language,  {g)  But  this  controversy  with  Scriptural 
weapons,  especially  on  the  part  of  the  Catholics,  was  nothing  but  a  faint 
reflection  of  the  extremely  animated  personal  exertions  made  for  the  some 
general  object  With  the  restoration  of  the  Catholic  Church  sprung  up  the 
hope  that  it  was  about  to  recover  all  it  had  lost.  The  liberal  party  in  tliat 
Church,  as  it  had  not  yet  entirely  discarded  the  Protestant  spirit,  might 
easily  have  tolerated  that  spirit  in  a  more  distinct  form  by  its  side.  The 
more  zealous  party,  on  the  other  hand,  from  its  very  nature  could  allow  of 
no  terms  in  its  opposition,  and  although  its  efforts  were  at  that  time  directed 
not  80  much  to  the  persecution  as  to  the  conversion  of  their  opponents,  its 
adherents  were  resolved  to  go  to  any  extremes,  and  to  demand  every  thing. 
Vast  plans  were  formed  for  future  action.  Once  more  the  papacy  felt  that 
it  was  destined  to  conquer  the  world.  Intellect  and  eloquence,  craft  and 
force,  were  put  in  requisition.  The  first  object  was  to  win  those  who  were 
ftill  undecided,  and  the  next  was  to  overthrow  Protestantism  in  countries 
where  Catholicism  was  in  the  ascendant,  or  at  least  where  the  govern- 
ment still  remained  in  the  hands  of  Catholics.  In  both  these  objects  they 
were  to  a  considerable  extent  successful,  in  consequence  of  the  prodigious 
aotivit^  of  the  Jesuits.  But  not  only  were  large  masses  of  people  induced 
to  change  their  connections,  but  many  individuals  passed  over  from  one  side 
to  the  other,  and  as  long  as  the  lines  of  separation  continued  indistinct,  and 
when  hopes  previously  formed  were  disappointed,  conversions  were  not 
infireqaent  on  either  side,  (h)  Vergerius^  the  papal  legate  in  Germany,  when 
he  attempted  to  combat  Luther's  spirit,  was  himself  carried  away  by  it.  {%) 
To  act  upon  Protestant  communities,  young  men  were  selected  from  their 
midst  and  imbued  with  all  the  enthusiasm  of  Catholic  prosolytism,  and  other 

d)  Flaciua  (p.  888)  Gerhard  (%  853).       e)  Are  nova.  Hildesb.  1682.  4 

f)  {C.  O.  JTold4r)  Mus  exentenitua,  per  fratrem  With,  de  Stuttg.,  Onl.  Minoram.  Tub.  1598.  4 
Lpa.  1617. 18. 

ify  For%r^  Bellam  nbiqutsUcum.  DHL  1627.  12.  (Alter  a.  neucr  Katzenkrieg  v.  d.  UbiqnitAt 
Ingolft  1629. 12.)  Nothw.  Vertbeld.  d.  h.  rOni.  Itoichs  ev.  Cliarff.  tu  StiLnde  Aagapfel^diirch  d.  hlerzu 
Tcrordn.  Theologen.  Lpz.  1628.  4  Brill  a.  d.  ev.  Auga{ȣ  1629.  4  Ev.  Brillenpatzer.  Lps.  1629.  4 
( AndraM)  W«r  hat  daa  Kal.  In's  Aug  geschlagen  ?  Dili  1629.  4. 

A)  F.  W.  Ph.  V.  Ammon,  Oallvrie  d.  denkwCinL  Peraonen,  welche  im  16.  17.  a.  18.  Jahrb.  v.  d. 
•T.  xnr  kath.  Kirche  Qbergetreten  Bin<L  £rl.  1S33. 

t)  K  T.  PerViA,  Or.  pro  P.  P.  Vergerio.  Jen.  1S42.  F.  Jl.  ScJi&nhuth,  V.  Btecbof  v.  Capo  d'latria. 
Chnd.  d.  ev.  QdatL  WOrt  1848.  vol  XIV.  P.  1.) 


470  MODEBN  CHURCH  HISTOBT.    PER.  V.    A.  D.  15iT-164& 

principles  which  were  found  in  the  Catholic  system.  But  the  most  strenuous 
efforts  were  made  to  influence  the  Protestant  princes,  who  were  assailed  on 
the  one  hand  hy  all  the  arts  of  seduction,  and  on  the  other  hj  the  weapons 
of  assassination  and  of  insurrection,  (k) 

§  894.     The  Propaganda. 

I.  Erectio  S.  Congrcgationis  de  fide  catb.  propafj^ndflL  (Ballar.  Rom.  Th.  IIL  i».  42l8ib) — BnllariuiD 
Pontir.  S.  Congr.  de  prup.  fide.  Rom.  1S89-41.  5  t<iI&  4.— II.  Biiyeri  H.  Congr.  de  prop.  fide.  Reglom. 
ITil.  4.  Otto  Jf^er,  d.  Prop.,  Ibre  Provinzen  u.  ibr  Recbt  Mit  beSw  RAcka.  a.  DeatsdiL  Gott 
18S2a.  9  ToK 

I.  Lett  edlflantes  et  cnrieiu«cs  6crit<f8  des  Miaedons  ctrang^rea.  Par.  (1717-76w  SI  vola^)  17S<K^  2S 
Tola.— Brown,  H.  of  the  pn)p.  ofChr.  among  the  heathen  since  the  ReC  Lond.  1S14.  8  vob.  P.  Witt- 
mann.  d.  Horrllchk.  d.  K.  in  Ihrcn  Miss.  a.  d.  -Olaubenafipalt.  Angab.  ISHat,  S  yofx  Bemrion^  VL 
g^n.  des  Misa.  catb.  Par.  1S468.  2  vola  4. 

There  was  no  Church  but  the  Roman  which  had  means,  opix)rtunity,  and 
willing  instruments  in  the  monks  for  establishing  churches  beyond  the  ocean. 
All  efforts  to  extend  religion  among  unbelievers,  or  to  recover  apostates  who 
were  looked  upon  as  for  ever  belonging  by  right  of  baptism  to  the  papacy,  (<i) 
were  directed  and  sustained  by  the  Congregation  de  propaganda  fide  (1622) 
in  Rome.  With  this  was  connected  the  College  of  the  Propaganda  (1627),  an 
institution  admirably  fitted  by  the  gradual  addition  of  a  number  of  endow- 
ments, for  training  the  children  of  the  Catholic  Church  to  be  missionaries  to 
all  nations.  The  idea  of  this  institution  had  been  already  realized  by  Ignatius 
in  the  organization  of  his  Collegium  Germanicnm  (1552)  for  the  education 
of  a  priesthood  favorable  to  Rome,  and  to  act  upon  the  German  nation.  (5) 
After  its  model  colleges  have  been  established  at  Rome  for  other  nations,  so 
that  on  the  festival  of  the  Three  Kings  the  praise  of  God  is  there  sung  by 
the  Church  as  it  was  on  the  primitive  Pentecost,  in  the  languages  of  many 
nations. 

§  895.     East  Indies, 

The  commanieation  and  Investigation  of  original  aathoritiee  waa  commenced  bj  JoIlc^  Cole>- 
brooke,  A.  W.  Schlegel,  Bopp,  Rainmobnn-Roy,  Rosen,  Lassen,  and  Brockhana  For  general  viewa : 
P.  V.  Bohlen^  d.  alte  Indien  in.  Rucks,  aaf  Aegypten.  Kunigsb.  1S30. 2  vols.  Th.  Bef\ffy^  Indien  in 
d.  HalL  EncykL  II.  vol  XVII.  lioth  in  Zeller's  Jahrb.  1S4«.  P.  ^,—J.  P.  Nitjei,  Ilfetoriae  Indic. 
I  XII.  (Flor.  1&S8.  t)  Anta.  1605.  La  Croze,  H.  da  Christ  des  Inde.<(.  Hayo.  1791  9  Tola,  with  Anm. 
T.  BohruUdt,  Hal.  a.  L.  ITSTss.  2  vols.  Norbert,  Mem.  bfet  sor  les  miss,  dea  JteaUea  anx  Indc9 
orient  6d.  8.  Beaanp.  1747.  2  vols.  PauHni  a  &  BurihoL  India  or.  chr.  Rom.  1794.  4.  [A  Voyage 
to  the  K  L  with  an  account,  Jlcc.  with  add.  bj  Forster^  and  transL  by  Johmtton^  Lond.  1800.]  Jfl 
M&Ubatier,  Qcsch.  d.  katb.  Miss,  in  Ostind.  b.  Mitte  d.  1&  Jhh.  Mnnfcb.  1852.-74.  }Va<M,  Indian 
Chorch's  Ubtory.  Lond.  1818.  J.  Hough,  Hist  of  Christ  in  India.  Lond.  1S89.  2  toIil  [IF.  Varti, 
View  of  the  Hist.  Lit  and  Ret.  of  the  Hindoos.  Hartt  1824.  12.  H.  IT.  WiUon^  Yiabna  Parana,  or 
Hindu  Myth,  and  Trad.  Lond.  1840.  4.  C.  CoUman,  Myth,  of  the  Hindoos.  Lond.  1S82.  4  I^rn- 
ttema^  Theogony  of  the  Hindoos,  &c.  Lond.  1S45.  &  U.  B.  MoMngUm,  Hinda  FhObaophj,  IhwQ 
the  Tamil,  with  notes,  Ac  New  Haren.  1854.  &] 

In  India  the  gospel  met  with  a  mild,  imaginative,  and  visionary  people, 
with  minds  conversant  with  the  infinite,  though  actually  existing  among  the 

It)  E.  g.  BanJce,  H.  of  the  Popes,  vol.  II.  p.  ICOs.  comp.  451 

a)  M^yer  vol.  L  p.  lOsa, 

b)  J.  CordarOj  CoU.  Oermanici  et  Hang.  Hist  Rom.  1770.  £  Daa  dfiulBdie  CoUegliim  in  Soia 
Lpiil84a. 


CHAP.  TL    GATE.  CHURCH.    $  89&  EAST  INDIES.    BBAHMANISM.  471 

ruins  of  primitive  civilization.  For  nearly  a  thousand  years  they  had  been 
the  victims  of  servitude,  first  under  Mohammedan  despots,  and  afterwards 
under  a  company  of  Christian  merchants,  daring  which  they  had  become 
cowardly,  fawning,  and  indolent  in  their  natures.  They  however  remained 
remarkable  for  their  powers  of  endurance,  fearless  and  stubborn  in  matters 
connected  with  their  religion,  and  filled  with  recollections  of  their  former 
glory.  The  Brahmins  were  probably  a  foreign  race,  who  at  some  former 
period  had  descended  from  the  Himalayan  mountaiuss  and  being  superior 
to  the  natives,  had  introduced  among  them  the  refinements  of  religion.  Ac- 
commodating themselves  to  an  organization  which  they  found  among  the 
people,  they  secured  enormous  privileges  for  themselves  by  an  unequal  appor- 
tionment of  the  intellectual  advantages  they  brought  among  the  graduated 
castes.  In  their  own  and  in  the  people^s  estimation,  they  were  equal  to  the 
gods,  while  the  Farias  were  regarded  as  beneath  the  brutes.  The  limits  of 
caste,  by  which  the  fate  of  every  individual  was  almost  unalterably  fixed 
according  to  his  merits,  were  supposed  to  have  been  assigned  by  the  Creator, 
so  that  what  was  lawful  in  one  caste  was  a  capital  offence  in  another.  All 
the  laws,  the  literature,  and  the  arts,  which  existed  among  the  people,  were 
traced  back  originally  to  the  sacred  writings  (Vedas),  which  were  said  to 
Lave  been  reduced  to  writing  long  before  the  time  of  Christ,  as  they  flowed 
from  the  lips  of  Brahma.  Brahmanism  was  originally  a  benignant  deifica- 
tion of  nature.  In  a  philosophical  sense,  Brahma  is  the  essence  of  all  exist- 
ence, his  only  attribute  is  infinity,  and  every  thing  possessing  individuality 
and  a  finite  nature  springs  from  Maya^  Appearance,  or  Illusion.  The  incon- 
sistency between  this  original  sense  and  its  philosophical  meaning  may  be 
seen  in  the  delicate  recoil  which  is  felt  by  the  people  from  all  contact  with 
nature.  The  higher  castes  therefore  eat  no  fiesh,  but  the  intercourse  of  the 
sexes  is  looked  upon  as  pure,  and  the  services  of  the  temples  are  connected 
with  the  indulgence  of  the  vilest  lust,  and  yet  the  perfection  of  human  wis- 
dom is  supposed  to  be  an  escape  from  the  illusion  of  the  finite,  and  an  utter 
loss  of  all  personal  consciousness.  By  contemplation  and  self-denials,  carried 
sometimes  to  the  extreme  of  suicidal  self-tortures,  man  is  elevated  until  he 
becomes  a  god.  Their  system  of  religion,  perhaps  a  combination  of  several 
different  national  religions,  when  fully  developed,  teaches  that  the  original 
Brahm  manifests  himself  as  Brahtna,  Vishnu,  and  Siva — in  other  words,  as 
the  Creation,  the  Development,  and  the  Reabsorption  of  all  things.  Hence 
Bometimes  one  and  sometimes  another  of  this  Trimurti  is  regarded  as  su- 
preme. According  to  their  epic  legend,  VUhnu''s  Deity,  regarded  as  the 
divine  life  of  nature,  has  frequently  become  incarnate,  at  one  time  as  a  beast, 
at  another  as  a  man  bom  of  a  virgin,  in  the  form  of  Hama  contending  with 
giants,  in  that  of  Krishna  as  a  prince  of  peace  crowned  as  a  victor,  and 
finally  he  will  yet  appear  in  that  of  KalH^  on  a  white  steed,  for  the  removal 
of  all  sin.  But  at  the  close  of  the  world,  Kala^  the  great  destroyer,  will  ap- 
pear and  swallow  up  every  thing,  and  last  of  all  even  the  three  supreme  gods 
themselves,  so  that  the  essence  of  Brahma  will  exist  once  more  alone.  The 
space  between  the  chief  gods  and  men  is  filled,  as  it  were  symbolically,  with 
a  kingdom  of  inferior  and  fanciful  divinities.    The  popular  fiuth  has  regarded 


472  IfODEBN  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PES.  Y.    A.  D.  151T-1UB. 

all  these  as  actual  persons,  and  the  dispute  between  different  parties  with 
respect  to  the  claims  of  Yishna  or  Siva  to  the  supreme  power  has  been 
aggravated  by  the  explanations  of  the  sages  and  the  embellishments  of  the 
poets,  until  the  spiritual  world  has  become  peopled  with  a  wonderfully  vari- 
ous and  confused  race  of  beings,  which  have  been  divided  into  numeroua 
sects.  The  greatest  contrasts  were  here  exhibited.  A  monkey  was  some- 
times deified  by  the  side  of  a  god  who  was  so  spiritualized  and  so  great,  that 
thought  itself  was  too  insignificant  to  conceive  of  him,  and  yet  some  many- 
limbed  monster  was  supposed  to  contain  and  to  represent  him.  This  faith, 
which  at  one  time  converted  the  rocky  mountains  into  temples,  had  so 
thoroughly  pervaded  every  relation  of  the  popular  life,  and  was  so  firmly 
incorporated  with  the  prejudices  even  of  the  Farias,  that  although  the  Chris- 
tian preachers  presented  many  points  of  doctrine  which  corresponded  with 
it,  no  great  results  could  for  a  long  time  be  expected  from  their  labors.  Bishops 
were  appointed  by  the  Portuguese  to  take  the  charge  of  their  possesions  in 
the  East,  but  no  congregations  were  collected  there  until  Francis  Xmier 
(after  1542),  with  all  the  enthusiasm  which  his  great  success  inspired,  per- 
formed extraordinary  acts  of  piety  among  them,  and  baptized  probaUy  a 
hundred  thousand  Parias  and  outcasts,  {a)  To  preserve  these  in  the  fiuth, 
however,  it  was  found  necessary  to  use  the  labors  of  the  inquisition  (1560). 
The  first  labor  of  this  court  was  directed  to  the  extirpation  of  a  few  congre- 
gations of  the  Christians  of  St.  Thomas^  which  had  maintained  an  existence 
there  in  the  same  condition  in  which  they  had  been  formed  as  a  part  of  the 
Syrian  Church  of  the  fifth  century.  These  Christians,  however,  in  the  popu- 
lar organization  of  the  Hindoo  people,  had  been  embraced  in  the  warrior 
caste.  The  name  of  Nestorius  was  also  once  more  solemnly  anathematized 
in  India.  The  Jesuit  Nobili  (after  1606),  in  the  character  of  a  Christian 
Brahmin,  was  not  altogether  without  success  in  his  appeals  to  the  higher 
castes,  {h)  The  Islam  of  the  early  conquerors  was  too  simple  and  powerfU 
to  be  overcome  without  a  desperate  struggle.  Still  the  efforts  of  the  Greet 
Mogul  AJchar  to  establish  a  religion  of  reason  (after  1578),  produced  a  much 
greater  approximation  to  the  religion  of  the  Jesuits.  In  1610,  three  impwial 
princes  mounted  on  white  elephants  rode  to  the  place  where  they  were  bap- 
tized.   Victory,  however,  still  remained  on  the  side  of  Mohammed. 

§  896.    Japan. 

After  the  researches  of  Joinville,  Buchanan,  Klaproth,  Mackenzie,  Colebrooke,  and  Bitt«r :  Onh 
bm-.  Art  Japan  in  d.  Ilall.  Encykl.  II.  vol.  XIII.  p.  SSOsb.  comp.  Ben/ey,  Ibid.  voL  XVIL  p.  1M«^ 
P.  d«  BokUii,  de  Baddhaismi  orig.  et  aetate.  Reglom.  1887.  J.  J.  Schmidt^  (Mteiotres  de  I'Aead. 
imperiale  de  Petersb.  1880.  vol.  II.  Liv.  2.  a  1882.  toL  II.  Uv.  1.)  Neumann,  PIlgeriUirtMi  Baddb. 
Prieater.  (Zeitach.  f.  hist  Tb.  1833.  8t  2.)  A.  WutUce,  de  Baddbaistar.  dlseipllDar.  Ymt.  1848.— 
Katmpfer^  Beechr.  v.  Japan,  hrsq.  v.  Dohm.  Lemg.  1777.  2  vols.  4  [H.  of  Japan,  Ane.  and  Pr.  State 
of  the  Gov.  ^bc  transl  bj  SchencJuter^  from  the  Germ,  of  Kaempfer^  Lond.  1727.  S  rola.  C]  P.  d§ 
ChaHwoix^  H.  du  Ghrbt  dans  I'Emp.  du  Japon.  Bom.  17128B.  8  toIs.  par  H.  D.  L.  O.  Par.  188CL  ft 


a)  Fr.  Xaverii  Epp.  1.  IV.  Par.  1631. 12.  Briofe  d.  h.  P.  v.  X.  libera,  u.  erkl  t.  J.  Butq,  Weu- 
wied  188«.  Hor.  Turulini,  de  vita  Xav.  Bom.  ICM.  and  often.  [DuboUy  LMtera  on  Cbr.  la  lad. 
Lond.  &  with  Totonley't  (Lond.  1824.  8.)  and  ITough'i  (Lond.  1820. 19.)  BepOca  to  Dnbote.] 

b)  FtaUl  (Norb€rty,  M6m.  hist  sur  lea  aflUr.  dea  Jds.  Lisb.  176&  7  vols.  4 


GBAP.  TL    GATE.  GHUBCH.    S896L  JAPAIiT.    BUDDHISM.  473 

Total  Cnmet^  H.  de  r«gL  de  Japu.  Par.  1715.  4  Angsb.  1788.  t-~mwfUn^  G.  d.  YerwandtBcb.  d. 
Lanudachen  B«l.  m.  d.  chr.  (Arehir.  t  KGcsch.  1S14  vol.  L  8t  8.)  [C.  McFarlane^  Geog.  and  Hist 
Aec  of  Japan.  New  York.  1852.  3.  7!  WdU,  J.  and  the  Japanese.  New  York.  1852.  P.  F.  t.  Ste- 
hdd^  Manners  and  Castoms  of  the  Japanese.  New  York.  1S40. 12.  Ooloicnln^  Mem.  of  Captivity  In 
J.  Lond.  1S52.  2  vols.  &  2  ed.] 

WLen  Xavier  reached  Japan,  he  found  that  the  Christian  Church  had 
been  imitated  by  the  devil^  for  already  bells,  rosaries,  celibacy,  monasticism, 
a  hierarchy,  and  apparently  a  spiritual  monarch  were  there.  The  primitive 
religion  of  the  country  was  a  mythical  worship  of  nature,  prompted  by  a 
lively  glow  of  sensuous  pleasure.  But  for  a  long  time  the  predominant  reli- 
gion had  been  a  Buddhism  which  had  been  introduced  from  abroad.  About 
six  hundred  years  before  Christ,  in  Magadha,  a  province  of  India,  arose  Gau^ 
tama  sumamed  Buddha^  i,  e.y  the  Wise,  who  enlisted  with  much  zeal  in  the 
work  of  refbnning  his  countrymen.  By  his  wisdom  and  self-denials  he  be- 
came an  incarnation  of  the  Deity,  according  to  the  sacred  legends,  the  eighth 
incarnation  of  Vishnu  by  Maya  in  the  form  of  a  pure  virgin.  In  this  incar- 
nation^ the  system  of  the  world  attained  a  self-consciousness.  As  he  pro- 
claimed the  universal  brotherhood  of  man,  the  system  of  caste  was  discarded 
by  him,  but  in  its  stead  was  gradually  introduced  a  hierarchy,  the  existing 
head  of  which  was  always  honored  as  an  incarnate  divinity.  The  spirit 
incolcated  by  Buddhism  is  mild  and  humane,  since  it  requires  that  its  fol- 
lowers should  sympathize  with  the  suiferings  of  every  living  thing,  and 
instead  of  demanding  bloody  sacrifices,  it  calls  upon  them  to  sacrifice  them- 
selves for  the  good  of  others.  Still  the  fundamental  principle  of  this  religion, 
that  the  higher  life  can  be  attained  only  by  a  liberation  of  ourselves  from  all 
the  illasion  of  a  personal  existence,  imposes  the  necessity  of  severe  and  cruel 
struggles.  The  natural  development,  therefore,  of  this  principle,  is  a  lifeleflB 
and  haughty  system  of  religion,  in  which  the  highest  merit  is  attached  to 
human  efforts,  (a)  About  a  hundred  years  after  Christ,  Buddhism  was  per- 
secuted by  the  Brahmans,  and  after  a  protracted  struggle  was  expelled  from 
Its  native  country.  It  soon,  however,  became  the  religion  of  nearly  all  the 
neighboring  nations,  from  whose  peculiar  characters  it  received  many  modi- 
fications. In  Japan,  Xavier  adopted,  though  in  a  higher  and  modified  sense, 
every  thing  in  Buddhism  which  was  considered  holy,  as  a  part  of  the  faith 
which  he  preached,  and  consequently  soon  succeeded  in  establishing  a  church. 
But  in  his  eagerness  to  penetrate  still  farther  into  heathen  countries,  this 
Apostle  of  the  Indies  died  soon  after  on  his  way  to  China  (1552).  Under 
the  direction  of  the  Jesuits,  a  most  splendid  ecclesiastical  establishment  was 
formed  in  Japan,  and  hopes  were  entertained  that  the  whole  nation  would 
9O0n  become  subject  to  its  sway.  But  in  consequence  of  some  immoralities 
on  the  part  of  the  European  residents,  and  the  suspicion  that  Christianity  was 
only  the  precursor  of  foreign  dominion,  a  series  of  sanguinary  persecutions 
(after  1587)  was  conmienced.  Thousands  even  of  the  native  inhabitants  died 
as  martyrs  for  the  new  faith.    About  the  middle  of  the  seventeenth  century 

[a)  JS.  Bumouft  Introd.  a  rillst  da  Bnddhisme  Indlen.  Par.  1845.  vol  I.  i.  R.  8.  Hardy,  Man- 
lul  of  BoddblMn,  Ao.  Lond.  1858.  a  Xi  Upham,  Hist  and  Doot  of  Buddhism.  Lond.  1829.  t  C, 
W.  Semmann^  Cctoehlam  of  the  Bbamana,  or  Laws  of  the  Bod.  Prleata.  (Ortent  TransL  Fand.) 
IxmmL  1682.  8.] 


474  MODERN  GIIUBCH  HISTOBT.    PEB.  T.    A.  D.  1517-1648. 

evorj  vestige  of  Ohristianity  was  obliterated  from  the  oonntrj,  and  all  inter- 
oonrse  with  foreigners  in  Japan  was  strictly  prohibited. 

§  897.     China, 

y.  Trigaut^  de  chr.  expe<L  apud.  Sinas  ex  comm.  RlcciL  Ang:  161S.  4  and  olten.  Ji  A.  SckaUf 
Relatio  do  initio  et  prog.  tni»ionis  See.  J.  apud  Cliincnses.  Vien.  166S.  Rat  1672.  Mlt  Anm.  t.  Mai^ 
»egg,  Vicn.  1:=^^  J)u  Ihtlde,  I>c«c  de  PEinp.  de  la  Chine.  Par.  1786.  8  toIs.  4.  Uebern  m.  Moabelmli 
Vorr.  Ritst  174S.  4  vola.  4.— For  tite  recent  investigational  8e«  Joomal  Asiatiqne.  Ahei-Rimutat^ 
Melanges  asiat  Par.  lS2.5s.  2  vols.  Nuuv.  Melanges.  Par.  1829a.  2  vol&  /S!(tfAr,  chin.  RelRbsrel.  Bri. 
1S35.  u.  rol.  S^ysitoine  «1.  Or.  p.  9ss.  Nfumann^  d.  Natur-  XL  Rel.  PhIL  d.  Chin.  Nach  d.  W.  d. 
Trichuhi.  (ZeitM:h.  f.  liisL  Tl).  1887.  P.  1.)  [Histories  and  Acouunta  of  China  by  T,  ThomUm^  (Lund. 
1844.  2  V.  8.)  C.  GutzUif,  (New  York.  1888.  1  v.  a)  JL  Murray,  (Edinb.  8  t.  12. 1S86.)  J.  P.  Davis, 
(New  Toric.  15^  2  v.  12.)  J.  Kidd,  (Lend.  1841.  &)  and  E.  WiUiamt,  (New  York.  1818.  6.)] 

In  the  extreme  East,  the  Europeans  found  an  innumerable  people,  whoee 
historical  accounts  went  as  far  back  as  those  of  the  Jews,  and  who  regarded 
themselves  as  the  centre  of  the  world.  Nearly  all  the  mechanical  arts  which 
had  recently  been  discovered  in  Europe,  were  found  to  have  been  in  exist- 
ence among  them  from  a  remote  antiquity,  in  connection  with  a  rigid  system 
of  civilization  which  had  for  thousands  of  years  successively  overcome  all 
their  conquerors.  The  state  was  organized  strictly  as  a  single  great  family, 
and  all  power  was  in  the  hands  of  the  emperor,  though  limited  by  an  inviola- 
ble usage  and  an  aristocracy  of  leai*ning.  The  consciousness  of  individual 
freedom  with  respect  to  moral  conduct  had  never  yet  been  awakened  among 
the  people.  Three  forms  of  religion  existed  there  side  by  side  in  peace.  The 
first  was  the  primitive  religion  of  the  empire,  of  which  Confuciu»  (Eong-fd- 
DsQ)  was  honored  as  the  founder.  This  was  a  simple  adoration  and  worship 
of  the  heavens  regarded  as  a  power  of  nature,  and  of  certain  genii  supposed 
to  be  subject  to  the  emperor,  together  with  a  devout  and  well-arranged  sys- 
tem of  moral  conduct,  (a)  The  second  was  the  doctrine  of  TaOy  a  system 
which  directed  men  to  adore  the  original  source  of  reason,  revealed  and 
incarnate  on  earth,  Qi)  but  degenerated  into  a  system  of  idolatry  and  magic 
The  third  was  the  worship  of  Buddha  (Fo-tho),  a  religion  which  had  been 
more  recently  introduced  among  the  people,  but  unsustained  especiaUy  in  the 
interior  provinces  by  a  powerful  hierarchy.  The  account  of  divine  things 
which  these  religions  gave  was  intelligent  and  candid,  but  without  reli^ous 
enthusiasm,  and  bore  no  traces  of  fanaticism  except  with  reference  to  the 
customary  rules  of  civility  towards  the  gods  and  the  dead,  and  with  respect 
to  the  etiquette  of  social  life.  As  the  natives  regarded  every  thing  foreign  with 
extreme  contempt,  the  Christian  missionaries  who  followed  in  the  train  of 
commerce  were  at  first  totally  unsuccessful  in  every  attempt  to  convert  them. 
The  respect  of  the  people  was  however  finally  secured  when  they  discovered 
the  superiority  of  the  missionaries  in  mathematical  science,  the  principles  of 
which  were  immediately  appreciated.  The  Jesuit  Ricei  (1582-1610)  obtained 
high  distinction  among  the  people  as  an  astronomer,  and  the  favor  of  the  im- 


a)  Schntt^  Werke  d.  chin.  Weisen  Eong-fki-DsQ.  Ilal  1826.  6  vola.  Confueii  Chi  King,  ed. 
J/bAA  Stuttg.  1S80. 

h)  Le  Tao-te-King,  on  le  Ilvre  de  la  raison  sapidroef  par  LaoUtu,  tradait  aveo  nn«  Terrion  latiiie 
et  le  teste  chinola,  par  G.  Gauthier,  Par.  1888.  [A.  l^ungtUdt^  Port.  BettL  and  Mladons  in  Cfalna. 
Boston,  1886.  a] 


CHAP.  VL    CATH.  CHURCH.    $  898.  WEST  INDIES.    PABAOUAY.  475 

perial  conrt.  (c)  After  this  the  Jesuits  established  numerous  congregations, 
built  churches,  and  translated  the  Scriptures,  and  even  the  Summa  of  St. 
Thomas,  but  with  a  careful  accommodation  to  the  religious  customs  and 
manners  of  the  people.  When  reproached  for  this  by  the  Dominicans  at 
Rome,  they  defended  themselves  on  the  ground  that  it  was  indispensable  to 
their  success,  and  was  as  innocent  as  the  apostles^  conformity  to  the  Jewish 
law.(d) 

§  898.      West  IndUs.     Cont,  from  §  290. 

Gonaalea  d'AvUa^  Tlieatro  ecc  de  las  ij^lesias  de  las  Indias.  Madr.  1G49s8l  2  vols.  Baurgoing^ 
Vertus  des  inlssionain  on  H.  dea  mira.  d'Aiiior.  Par.  IGM.  2  vols.  O,  Baluffi^  I'America  tin  tempo 
upainiuola  si)tto  Tvpetto  religiuso  (till  1S43).  Ancon.  1S45.  3  vuls.  Comp.  Pbppig^  Indien  In  d.  Hall. 
EocykL  II.  vol  XVII.  esp.  p.  SSls*. — L.  A.  Afuratori,  Christlanesimo  folic©  nelle  misaionc  nel  Para« 
guaL  Ven.  1748.  2  vols.  4  (Abstract:  RelaL  des  uiise.  du  P.  Par.  17M.)  CharUvaix,  II.  du  P.  Par. 
175«L  8  vola.  4.  Nurem.  176S.  Paukttn  Rel^e  io  d.  Miss,  nach  P.  edit  by  Fro«t,  Viun.  1829.  In  an 
unfHendly  spirit:  Ibagne*^  Regno  Qiesuitico  del  P.  Lissab.  1770.  Uebers.  v.  Le  Brft,  K«iln.  (Lpa.) 
1774  [/?.  Southfy,  Talo  of  Paraguay.  Lond.  12ino.  Ibid.  II  of  Brazil.  Lond.  1810.-19.  8  vols.  4. 
Abh«  Raynal^  Phil,  and  Pol.  Uiict  of  the  Setrl.  and  Traile  of  Karopeans  in  the  W.  I.  flrom  the  Freneh 
by  J.  Jiutamond,  Lond.  1787.  12.  Views  of  the  Planting  of  (Colonies  and  Missions  In  Mexico  and 
Pera  may  be  found  in  the  works  of  Pretcott^  Bei-nal  Diaz^  (transl.  by.  M.  Keating^,  Lond.  1800.  4.) 
JH  SoU9t  (tnuuL  by  TuumMnd^  Lond.  1724.)  RobertaorCs  America,  and  other  works.] 

In  Brazil,  baptism  was  administered  to  prisoners  while  dying,  and 
wherever  it  could  be  performed  under  the  protection  of  the  Portuguese 
arms.  A  splendid  ecclesiastical  establishment  was  immediately  formed  in 
every  country  conquered  by  the  Spaniards.  But  although  the  natives  were 
generally  protected  by  the  laws  and  defended  against  the  colonists  by  the 
monks,  they  were  hastening  rapidly  to  extinction.  Even  where  they  were 
subjugated  to  the  Spanish  yoke  and  Christianized  (Indies  aldeidados),  they 
did  not  renounce,  but  continued  at  the  same  time  the  worship  of  their  an- 
cient gods.  The  inquisition,  however,  took  care  that  the  outward  semblauoe 
of  Cliristianity  was  maintained.  With  an  heroic  courage,  the  Jesuits  and  Qor 
pnchins  pressed  forward  into  the  open  primitive  forests  of  the  country,  and 
along  with  the  gospel,  carried  in  their  most  simple  and  cheerful  form  the 
blessings  of  civilization.  But  when  the  Jesuits  urged  at  Madrid,  that  the 
great  obstacle  to  the  progress  of  Christianity  among  the  nations,  was  the 
ornelties  and  evil  examples  of  the  Spaniards,  they  obtained  permission  to 
establish  Christian  colonies  among  the  Indians  who  were  as  yet  independent, 
and  which  no  Spaniard  was  to  enter  without  their  permission.  Such  was 
the  origin  of  the  republic  of  Paraguay  (after  1610),  governed  by  the  Jesuits 
in  a  patriarchal  style.  The  converted  savages  were  treated  as  children,  but 
as  pious  and  happy  children,  and  although  much  wealth  was  derived  by  the 
order  from  the  country  under  its  subjection,  the  prosperity  and  happiness  of 
the  people  was  entirely  the  fruit  of  its  exertions. 


6)  WertKeim,  Ricci  (Pleta,  nene  thcol.  Zeitech.  ISSa  P.  S.) 

d)  PlaUl^  (p.  472.)  I^  moral  pratique  des  Jds.  16698&  to1&  IL  TL  YIL 


476  MODEBN  CHUBCH  HISTOBT.    FEB.  Y.    A.  D.  in7-1648. 


CHAP.  VII.— THE  THIRTY  YEARS'  WAR. 

The  orlgr.  aathoiities  for  the  Hist  of  tlie  80  yn  War.  (Monat»bL  d.  Allg.  Zeitg.  1848e.  Dta  Jml 
dnne,)—Lonfforp,  d.  K.  Mi^.  u.  d.  b.  Rcicbs  Acta  pubL  (Frk£  10218&)  Tub.  178988.  17  to1&  t 
(Pappuf)  EpiL  rer.  Oemi.  1617-48.  c.  aniniadvv.  J.  G.  Boehm,  Lpa.  1760.  Tbeatrum  Europ.  Frk£ 
1785*.  vol.  I.-IV.  KhfrenhilUr,  (p.  35S.)--5tA£tf«r,  Gesch.  d.  drelaa.  Kr.  Lpa.  1791.  2  vota.  and  oft 
Fortge^  T.  WuUmann,  Lpa.  1809.  2  voU  [Tbirty  Years*  War,  fVom  tho  Qerm.  of  Schiller  bj  A,  J, 
W.  Jforri4on^  New  Tork.  1847.  12.]  K.  A.  Menul^  Gescb.  d.  drei-s.  Kr.  (Oe«cb.  d.  Deatsch.  toL 
YIm.)  BrsL  1S35-9.  8  vols.  SoUl,  d.  Bel.  Kr.  in  Deutscbl.  Uamb.  lS40a.  2  vol&  F.  W.  Barlhctd, 
Oescli.  d.  d«utschen  Kr.  v.  To<le  G.  Ad.  an.  Stuttg.  184288.  2  vols.  [MfnaeFa  Hist  of  Germany  hM 
been  transl.  by  Mr*.  G.  Uorrock*^  Lond.  1848b  8  vola.  12.  See  al&o  KfMrauteiCa  Hist  of  Germ, 
and  CU.  mtckelTa  Life  of  Wallensteio.] 

§  899.     Oceanians. 

The  Catholic  and  Protestant  parties  in  Germany  oontinued  to  stand  in  an 
antagonistic  and  threatening  attitnde  with  respect  to  each  other.  The  hoose 
of  Ilapshorg,  the  head  of  the  Catholic  party,  by  the  Yast  extent  of  territoiy 
which  it  had  acquired,  became,  in  fact,  dangerous  to  the  liberties  of  Europe, 
but  its  power  was  thus  far  restrained  by  its  divisions  at  home  and  its  intel- 
lectual inferiority.  In  Bavaria,  and  in  most  of  the  prelatical  countries,  Pro- 
testantism, which  had  been  in  the  ascendant  about  the  middle,  was  nearly 
suppressed  at  the  close  of  the  sixteenth  century.  That  which  had  been 
found  impossible  to  be  accomplished  among  the  people,  the  Jesuits  attempted 
among  the  princes.  Jaeob,  Margrave  of  Baden  (1690X  and  Wolfgang  Wil- 
liam, Count  Palatine  of  Nevhurg  (IG14),  proclaimed  themselves  converts  to 
the  Catholic  Church,  (a)  In  consequence  of  the  early  death  of  the  Mar^ 
gravine,  the  conversion  of  the  former  was  attended  by  no  important  results 
among  his  subjects,  and  the  Count  Palatine^s  own  confessor  was  still  a  de- 
fender of  Protestantism.  Political  reasons  were  doubtless  the  reason  for  the 
conversion  of  the  count  himself,  but  by  means  of  it  a  country  previously  suj^- 
posed  to  be  lost  became  open  to  the  efforts  of  the  papacy.  The  ecclesiastical 
reservation  was  respected  according  to  the  will  of  those  who  for  the  time 
had  possession  of  the  government.  Hence  nearly  all  the  property  of  the 
Church  in  Northern  Germany  and  Suabia  fell  gradually  into  the  hands  of 
the  Protestant  princes,  or  was  administered  by  Protestant  bishops  as  electoral 
princes.  But  when  the  Elector  Oehhard^  High  Steward  of  Cologne  (aft^ 
1577),  who  had  always  been  unfriendly  to  the  Catholic  party,  gave  himself 
np  to  his  passion  for  Agnes  of  Mansfeld,  and  sought  to  legalize  his  forced 
marriage  with  her  in  the  Reformed  Church,  he  was  deposed  by  the  pope,  the 
Bishop  of  Liege,  a  Bavarian  prince,  was  elected  by  the  chapter  in  his  place, 
and  he  was  abandoned  even  by  the  Lutherans  (1588).  {h)  Sentence  of  pro- 
scription was  pronounced  by  the  imperial  aulic  council  upon  DanauwHrthy  for 
improper  treatment  of  a  Catholic  procession,  and  not  only  was  the  decree 
enforced  by  Bavaria,  but  Protestantism  itself  was  violently  oppressed,  and 
the  liberty  of  the  imperial  cities  was  impaired  (1607).    In  view  of  the  dan- 

a)  Unsere  Jacobs,  M.  v.  B.  chriitt].  orhebl.  a.  wohlAindlrte  Motiven,  waram  wir  a.  Trleb  OM. 
Oewisa.  d.  luth.  Lebre  verlaasen,  darch  Jo.  Pvttorium^  Ciiln.  1691.  4  Reihing,  Marl  argilUU  dvit 
sanctae  b.  e.  rel.  cath.  ftindamenta,  quibus  insistens  Wolfj;.  C.  PaL  in  civit  sanctam  fkiuitnin  pedem 
IntuliL  Col.  1615.  4.  Uebers.  v.  VftUr,  Col.  1615.  4. 

h)  J.  D.  KoeUr,  de  actls  et  fatls  Gebb.  Tr.  Altort  1728.  L  F.  W.  Barihoid,  Q.  Tr.  t.  Waldbng. 
(Baamer*8  hist  Taachcnb.  1840.) 


CHAP.  TIL    THIRTY  YEARS*  WAB.    $  899.  CAUSES,    f  400.  BOHEM.  WAB.      477 

ger,  the  Elector  Frederic  Y,  of  the  Palatinate  induced  a  few  Protestant  states 
to  form  a  Union  (1608).  In  opposition  to  this,  Maximilian  of  Bavaria,  a  man 
of  a  powerful  and  practical  intellect,  whose  interest  was  identified  with  the 
success  of  the  Catholic  cause,  placed  himself  at  the  head  of  a  league  com- 
pos^ of  the  ecclesiastical  princes,  {e)  Saxony,  as  the  representative  of 
Lutheranism,  took  sides  with  the  emperor.  As  long  as  the  Jesuits  kept  the 
question  of  the  religious  peace  in  a  state  of  suspense,  the  Union  refused  at 
the  Diet  of  RatUbon  (1613)  to  submit  to  the  decision  of  the  majority  in  all 
matters  connected  with  religion,  and  when  their  complaints  were  not  attend- 
ed to,  the  members  of  it  withdrew  entirely  from  the  diet. 

§  400.     The  Bohemian  War.     Cont.  from  §  857. 

jmiUr^  fQnf  B&cher  ▼.  Buhnv  Kr.  DthI.  1S40.    liichter,  v.  Bohmen-Aaft-ahre  o.  d.  dreisa.  Kr. 
Unadien  n.  B«gtnn.  Erf.  1844.— CI  A.  Peacheck^  Qesch.  d.  Oegenrcf.  in  Bobmen.  Dnd.  1844.  2  volsw 

Under  the  influence  of  the  heir-apparent  to  his  throne,  the  Emperor 
Matthias  ventured  to  oppress  individuals  among  the  Bohemians,  or  allowed 
the  Catholic  land  proprietors  to  do  so.  A  petition  was  therefore  presented 
to  the  emperor  on  tliis  subject,  by  the  Utraquists.  His  answer,  however,  was 
of  a  threatening  character.  Two  imperial  counsellors,  supposed  to  be  the 
•  authors  of  this,  were  thrown  from  a  window  of  the  castle  in  Prague,  and 
the  members  of  the  diet  favorable  to  the  Utraquists  seized  the  reins  of  gov- 
emment.  Ferdinand  11.^  a  pupil  of  the  Jesuits,  and  resolved  to  venture 
every  thing  to  bring  about  the  triumph  of  Catholicism,  had  already  sup- 
pressed by  a  quiet  exercise  of  power  the  Protestantism  which  had  been  pre- 
dominant in  his  patrimonial  inheritance  of  Carinthia  and  Styria,  when  on  the 
death  of  Matthias  he  was  crowned  emperor  at  Frankfort,  {a)  The  Bohe- 
mians pronounced  him  an  enemy  to  the  liberties  and  religion  of  their  country, 
and  declared  that  he  had  forfeited  the  throne  (Aug.  17,  1619).  They  then 
chose  Frederic  V,  of  the  Palatinate  for  their  king.  The  League  took  up 
arms  in  behalf  of  Ferdinand,  while  the  Union  and  Saxony,  from  motives  of 
prudence  and  from  a  rigid  adherence  to  the  strict  principles  of  Lutheranism, 
remained  inactive.  Frederic  knew  nothing  of  royalty  except  how  to  enjoy 
its  pleasures ;  whatever  power  he  possessed  in  Bohemia  was  destroyed  at  the 
battle  of  the  White  Mountain  near  Prague  (Nov.  8,  1620),  and  the  conversion 
of  Bohemia  was  effected  by  the  Jesuits  and  the  soldiers  from  Lichtenstein. 
The  Bohemian  literature  was  committed  to  the  flames  by  the  commission  for 
the  reformation  of  the  people.  John  of  NepomuV^  who  had  once  been  the 
archbishop's  vicar  and  confidant  in  a  hierarchical  controversy  with  King 
Wenceslaus,  and  had  been  thrown  during  a  fit  of  passion  by  that  king  into 
the  river  from  the  bridge  of  the  Muldau  (1393),  now  became  the  national 
saint  of  the  new  Catholic  kingdom  of  Bohemia.  The  legend  of  his  death 
was  intentionally  enlarged,  and  he  was  looked  upon  as  the  martyr  for 
the  seal  of  confession.  The  qualities  and  incidents  which  history  has 
attributed  to  John  Huss  were  now  transferred  to  this  saint  of  the  bridge,  that 


^  E.M.9.  ArtUn^  Geech.  Maxim.  I.  PasMa  1842.  t  2  toUl 

a)  F,  Bwier^  0«ach.  K.  Perd.  XL  a.  tr.  Eltera  b.  i.  Kronung  in  Fnukfl  Sobaffh.  1850. 4  vola. 


478  MODERN  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  V.    A.  D.  151T-iei& 

the  memorj  of  the  reformer  (Master  Jan)  might'  be  effaced  from  the  minds 
of  the  people,  (h) 

§  401.     The  German  War. 

The  emperor  was  resolved  to  destroy  Frederic  V.  even  as  a  prince  of  the 
empire,  and  it  was  principally  for  this  reason  that  he  now  kept  up  and 
strengthened  his  army.  The  office  of  elector  in  the  Palatinate  was  given  to 
Bavaria  (1028).  In  all  his  patrimonial  Austrian  possessions  the  Protestant 
religion  was  entirely  suppressed.  The  Duke  of  Savoy  had  long  since  (1602) 
consumed  the  revenues  from  the  sale  of  the  Jubilee  indulgences,  in  maintain- 
ing free  companies  for  surprising  the  army  of  the  Reformed  Church,  and  the 
people  of  Geneva  merely  instituted  an  annual  thanksgiving  in  commemora- 
tion of  his  failure  (Pescalade).  But  in  the  Valteline^  on  the  Italian  border, 
the  Catholics  murdered  their  reformed  fellow-countrymen  (July,  1C20),  and 
Spanish  and  Austrian  troops  took  possession  of  the  country,  as  well  as  of  some 
parts  of  the  Gray  League,  {a)  When  all  opposition  in  Germany  had  been  put 
down  by  Wallenstein,  the  emperor  proclaimed  the  Edict  of  Restitution^  (h) 
that  it  might  be  an  authentic  explanation  of  the  Religious  Peace.  According 
to  this,  all  those  foundations  belonging  to  the  Catholic  Church  which  had 
been  confiscated  since  the  Treaty  of  Passau  were  to  be  restored,  the  Calvin- 
ists  were  excluded  from  the  privileges  granted  in  the  Religions  Peace,  and 
Catholic  states  were  not  to  be  impeded  in  their  efforts  to  convert  their  sub- 
jects. The  violent  proceedings  which  ensued  during  the  execution  of  this 
edict  were  followed  by  others  of  still  greater  violence,  until  Protestantism 
appeared  once  more  on  the  point  of  utter  extinction,  (c)  Bnt  jnst  at  this 
critical  moment  the  Catholic  powers  began  to  contend  among  themselves. 
France  and  Rome  became  alarmed  at  the  formidable  power  of  the  house  of 
Hapsburg.  Wallenstein  reminded  the  pope  that  Rome  had  not  been  plun- 
dered for  more  than  a  hundred  years,  and  a  passage  into  Germany  was  opened 
by  France  for  Gusfavus  Adolphm  (June  24,  1630),  who  both  from  policy  and 
religion  espoused  the  cause  of  Protestantism,  and  re-established  it  by  his 
bold  military  exploits,  {d)  After  his  heroic  death  (Nov.  6, 1682)  the  war  was 
maintained  by  the  Swedish  generals,  who  were  secretly  supported  by  Itiche- 
lieu.  They,  however,  held  out  with  great  difficulty,  since  by  the  treaty  of 
Prague  (1035)  the  Elector  of  Saxony  once  more  forsook  not  only  the  com- 
mon cause,  but  even  the  foreign  policy  of  Protestantism,  until  France  openly 
came  to  their  support.  Neither  party  can  be  said  to  have  been  successful, 
and  Germany  was  desolated  by  a  civil  and  religious  war,  by  no  means  na- 

b)  The  first  Altar  in  1621.  Canonization  in  1629.  Life  in  Jo.  Nep.  by  tbe  Jesuit  Balbi  about 
1670.  (Acta  SS.  M^j.  vol  III.  p.  C67.)  The  history:  PeUel,  Oescb.  Wenzela.  vol  L  p.  86<L  Urkna- 
denb.  p.  109.  154ss.  The  expedient  of  two  jtcrsonB  called  Jo.  of  Nep.  waa  reaorted  to  eves  In  Aett 
SS.  p.  670.  67a. 

a)  {Cp.  Waser.)  Veltlini5ch  Blntbad.  Zar.  1621.  4    De  Porta,  Hist  ret  Ece.  Rhaet  IL  pw  SSOic 
I)  Londorp,  Th.  III.  p.  1047. 

c)  Canijfa.  de  Genn.  sacra  restaarata.  Col  1689. 

d)  Erinnerungen  an  O.  A.  Eigenhandige  £inl  z.  Oescb.  s.  Leb.  ed.  by  /?SAa,  Hal.  1906L  Jh^^ 
dor/,  Ciuojtr.  de  reb.  Saec  ab  exjiediL  O.  A.  UItri\j.  1696.  Frcf  1707.  t  J.  F.  O/rdr0r,  Oescb.  O.  A. 
n.  sr.  Zeit  Stuttg.  (1837-4a)  1S58.  Gei}«r,  Oescb.  ▼.  Scbw.  vol.  IIL  HeiHng.  O.  A.  In  DeatschL  BH. 
18M.    r  W.  Harte,  Life  of  G.  A.  Lond.  1709.  8  vols.  L    J.  F,  BoUingM,  Life  of  O.  A.  Load.  1888. 11] 


CHAP.  VIL    THIBTT  YEAB9*  WAR.    f  402.  PEACE  OP  WESTPHALIA.       479 

tional  in  its  objeoto,  but  eqnivooal  in  its  nature  and  prosecuted  by  the  leaders 
for  varions  subordinate  ends. 

§  402.     The  Peace  of  Westphalia. 

L  InAtrnmentnm  P.  W.  ed.  Beminger^  Monast,  1648.  Meiem.,  Gott.  1747.—^.  Adami  Areana 
P.  W.  Fret  1698.  4.  ed.  JfeUm,  Gott  1737.  4  Memolres  de  M.  D.  (07.  du  Me»tM  (TAcattx.)  CoL 
Oren.  1674.  J.  G.  v.  MeUm,  Acta  P.  W.  publlca.  Hann.  1784aflL  6  vols.  f.  m.  Register.  Giitt  1740.  £— 

IL  FSUtw,  Oeist  d.  W.  F.  Gott.  1795.  Senkenberg,  Darst.  d.  W.  F.  Frkfl  1S04  Woltmann^QtwAk. 
d.  W.  F.  Lpz.  1808a.  2  to1& 

Those  who  had  commenced  the  war  did  not  live  to  witness  its  conclusion. 
Austria  was  compelled  to  acknowledge  that  Protestantism  and  Germany 
were  not  to  be  overcome  by  violence.  With  a  formidable  desperation  the 
people  of  the  different  nations  demanded  peace.  After  many  tedious  and  in- 
tricate negotiatioDs  at  Munster  and  Osnabruck,  a  peace  was  concluded  in 
October,  1648,  to  be  henceforth  a  fundamental  law  of  the  German  nation. 
Under  the  guarantee  of  France  and  Sweden,  Bavaria  retained,  besides  the 
electoral  dignity,  the  Upper  Palatinate,  and  an  eighth  electorate  was  formed 
for  the  Lower  Palatinate,  which  was  now  restored.  France  and  Sweden  were 
recompensed  for  their  trouble  by  certain  territories  of  the  empire.  All  dam- 
ages were  compensated  by  means  of  the  secularized  property  of  the  Church. 
The  right  of  each  state  of  the  empire  to  form  alliances  with  foreign  powers, 
provided  it  was  not  in  opposition  to  the  emperor  and  the  empire,  was  formally 
acknowledged.  With  respect  to  the  controversy  between  the  two  churches, 
the  ^ve  articles  of  the  Deed  of  Osnaburg  were  adopted,  in  which  the  princi- 
ple of  a  complete  legal  equality  of  both  parties  with  respect  to  each  other, 
was  assumed,  and  all  ecclesiastical  and  political  protests  were  rejected :  **  The 
Religious  Peace  of  Augsburg  shall  be  inviolably  kept  by  each.  In  all  impe- 
rial courts  and  deputations  the  number  of  members  from  each  religious  party 
shall  be  equal.  In  the  Imperial  Diet,  if  the  two  religious  parties  differ  from 
each  other,  nothing  shall  be  decided  by  a  majority  of  votes  but  by  com- 
promise. With  respect  to  ecclesiastical  property  the  possessions  of  all  par- 
ties shall  be  decided  by  the  state  of  affairs,  on  the  1st  of  January,  1624. 
Wherever  a  free  exercise  of  religion  was  publicly  tolerated  in  that  normal 
year  it  shall  be  continued,  but  where  this  was  not  the  case  liberty  of  domes- 
tic worship  shall  be  permitted.  The  relations  of  the  Reformed  Church  to- 
ward the  Catholics  are  established  on  grounds  similar  to  those  of  the  churches 
professing  the  Augsburg  Confession.  But  the  legal  relations  of  the  two  Pro- 
testant parties  toward  each  other  to  continue  precisely  as  they  were  at  that 
time,  whether  settled  by  treaty  or  by  usage.  A  prince  who  may  go  over 
from  one  Protestant  party  to  the  other,  may  grant  religious  toleration  to  those 
who  belong  to  tfie  some  creed  with  himself,  but  he  shall  allow  the  established 
Church  to  remain  unmolested."  The  evangelical  Hungarians  had  received 
support  from  Rakoczy  of  Transylvania,  and  in  the  treaty  of  Lim  (1648)  had 
secured  the  restoration  of  their  ecclesiastical  rights.  The  Silesian  principali- 
ties, but  none  of  the  other  Austrian  patrimonial  states,  were  included  in  the 
provisions  of  the  Peace  of  Westphalia.  Through  the  mediation  of  Venice 
and  France,  at  the  treaty  of  Milan  (1689)  the  Gray  League  recovered  its 
Italian  poeeessiona,  but  with  the  stipulation  that  the  Protestants  should  be 


480  HODSBN  CHUBCH  HISTORY.    PES.  Y.    A.  D.  1517-164& 

exclnded.  A  peace  without  a  genuine  reconciliation  was  thos  conolnded  for 
every  part  of  Europe,  and  the  balance  of  power  between  the  Oatholic  and 
Protestant  Churches  was  secured  by  the  imperial  constitution,  but  the  em- 
pire was  divided  and  sacrificed  to  foreign  influences. 


CHAP.  Vm.    THE  ORIENTAL  CHURCH. 

CnMiiut.  (p.  856  )  Lto  AU.  (p.  855.)  R.  Simon^  H.  erit  des  dogiuM  et  oontroT.  dc«  ehivtieiu  or. 
Trevoux.  17U.  Ifeinscciu»^  Abbild  d.  altern  a.  neaern  gr.  K.  Lpa.  171L  4.  M.  Is  Quien^  OrleDS«br. 
Par.  1740.  3  vols.  t.  Libri  symb.  Eco.  or.  ed.  J.  Kimmd^  Jen.  1848.  Appendix  LL.  sjinb.  ed.  1f«<tt- 
enhorn,  Jen.  1850.  [*/  M.  NeoU^  H.  of  the  Holy  Eastern  Chnrch.  Lond.  1850.  2  voK  &  7!  SmUh^ 
Greek  CbarcK  its  Dooo.  At  Rites.  Lond.  1080.  &  John  CofoiU^  Some  Aoooant  of  tbe  Oxeek  Qmi^ 
Lond.  1723.  f  ] 

§  403.     Connectifms  with  Protestants, 

A  Greek  translation  of  the  Augsburg  Confession  (a)  and  a  letter  of  aaki- 
tation  to  Joasaph  II,  (I)  the  Patriarch  of  Constantinople,  was  sent  by  Me- 
lancthon,  by  the  hands  of  a  Greek,  but  no  reply  was  ever  received.  By 
means  of  a  preacher  connected  with  an  embassy  at  Constantinople,  the  theo- 
logian of  Tubingen  was  induced  to  send  another  translation  to  the  Patriarch 
Jeremias  II  (1674).  The  answer  of  that  prelate  was  written  in  accordanoe 
with  the  very  strictest  forms  of  Greek  orthodoxy,  and  as  it  expressed  a  desire 
that  the  correspondence,  if  agreeable  to  them,  should  have  no  further  dis- 
cussion of  doctrines,  but  be  confined  to  an  exchange  of  Iriendly  civilities,  the 
intercourse  was  broken  off  (1581).  (c)  Cyrillus  Luearis,  a  native  of  Candia, 
who  had  been  educated  at  Padua,  formed  connections  when  in  Lithuania 
with  reformed  clergymen,  which  were  continued  by  means  of  Dutoh  and 
English  ambassadors  after  he  became  Patriarch  of  Alexandria  (1602)  and  sub- 
sequently of  Constantinople  (1621).  To  prevent  the  further  progress  of  the 
Roman  Church,  and  to  infuse  new  life  into  the  formal  worship  of  his  own 
Church,  he  formed  an  alliance  with  the  young  Church  of  the  West,  and  even 
transmitted  to  Geneva  the  form  of  a  Calvinistic  Confession  of  Faith,  (i) 
This  was  enough,  without  the  subsequent  efforts  of  the  Jesuits,  to  excite  tiie 
Greek  bishops  against  him.  On  the  ordinary  accusation  of  high  treason  he 
was  strangled  (1688),  (e)  and  the  Oriental  patriarchs  execrated  his  memory.  (/) 

a)  *E^ofio\6yriait  ri)s  hp^oHS^ov  T^crrcws.    Basil  1569. 

b)  Corp.  lief.  vol.  IX.  p.  921. 

c)  Acta  et  scrr.  TbeoU.  Wirt  et  Tatr.  Const  Y it  1534.  4  f.  Schnurrer^  de  actis  inter  Tabu  TbMfi. 
et  Tatrr.  Const  (Orr.  acad.  ed,  Paula*.  Tub.  182S.) 

d)  *AvaTo\iK^  6fio\oyia  rvs  XP-  iri<rT««y.     Gen.  (lat  1«29.  JTimmel  p.  S4.)  168& 

€)  Aymon^  Monamcns  authent  de  la  reL  des  Oreos.  Uaye.  1708.  4.  TK  Smithy  CoUe^  de  Cp, 
Luc  L<md.  1707.  Bohnstedt,  dc  Cyr.  Luc  HaL  1729.  4  Mohniie^  Cyr.  Lac  (Stud.  XL  BWt  1882.  P. 
8.)    Ticetsten  Cyr.  Luc  (DeatscLe  Zeltscb.  t  efar.  W.  1850.  N.  898s.) 

/)  Kimmel,  p.  898.  40a  825. 


CHAP.  YIII.    ORIENTAL  CHUBCn.    1 404.  RUSSIA.  481 

§  404.     The  Russian  Church, 

For  Lit  see  S  2S2.  SlraJJ^  Beitrr.  t.  nisst  KGesch.  Ilal.  1827.  vol  I.  UUmann  G.  Stnhl.  (Stud, 
a.  Krit.  1831.  P.  2.)  H.  J.  Schmitt,  krlt  Oesch.  d.  neiigr.  u.  d.  riua.  K.  Majence  1340.  A.  N  Mu- 
raicUf,  H.  of  tlio  Chnrch  of  Russia,  transl.  (In  lluwlan.  Petereb,  18*?.)  by  Bhickmorf^  Oxf.  1842. 
{P.  Rycant,  The  present  State  of  the  Arm.  &  Greek  Churches.  Ix>nd.  1679.  8.] 

In  the  course  of  political  development  the  Russian  Chnrch  necessarily 
became  independent  of  the  see  of  Constantinople.     As  the  Patriarch  Jere- 
mias  was  much  embarrassed  for  want  of  funds,  it  was  not  difficult  to  obtain 
his  consent  that  a  patriarch  sliould  be  appointed  for  Moscow,  as  the  third 
Rome  (1589).  («)    The  Russian  patriarchs  were  however  obliged,  until  the 
middle  of  the  seventeenth  century,  to  obtain  confirmation  at  Constantinople. 
The  Roman  Church,  ever  since  the  time  of  Gregory,  has  had  its  eye  upon  a 
union  with  the  Russian  Churcli.    A  hope  of  such  a  union  was  encouraged  by 
the  Tzar  Iwan  WasiljeiDitsc\  as  he  was  anxious  to  obtain  the  assistance  of 
the  emperor  and  the  mediation  of  the  pope  in  an  unsuccessful  war  which  he 
was  carrying  on  against  the  Poles  (1581).    But  in  spite  of  the  artful  policy 
of  the  Jesuit  Posferino^  (h)  the  hope  became  extinguished  in  proportion  as  the 
necessities  of  the  Tzar  diminished.    The  efforts  of  that  emissary  were,  how- 
ever, more  successful  in  some  Russian  provinces,  whicli  fell  with  Lithuania 
into  the  hands  of  the  Poles.     Michael  liahosn^  the  Metropolitan  of  Kiow,  to- 
gether with  a  portion  of  the  clergy,  at  tlie  Synod  of  Brzesc  (1696),  su omitted 
to  the  pope,  hoping  they  might  share  tlie  advantages  of  the  Catholic  clergy, 
and  save  the  orthodox  Church  from  the  apostasy  which  had  commenced 
among  the  nobility.    The  Union  was  effected  in  conformity  with  the  agree- 
ment which  had  been  formed  at  Florence,  with  a  great  respect  at  first  for  old 
ancestral  nsages.  (c)    But  gradually  the  forms  of  worship  became  latinized 
through  the  influence  of  the  Roman  monks,  who  entered  the  convents  be- 
longing to  the  Union,  while  all  those  churches  which  did  not  enter  that  con- 
nection sunk  under  the  temptations  and  persecutions  to  which  they  were  sub- 
jected.   To  confirm  the  views  and  feelings  of   the   Orientil   Church  in 
opposition  to  the  encroachments  of  Roman  and  Protestant  elements,  a  Ru.«?- 
nan  catechism  was  composed  (1642)  by  Pctrus  Mogilas  the  orthodox  Metro- 
politan of  Kiew,  and  was  confirmed  by  all  the  associated  patriarchs  of  the 
Greek  Church,  as  the  confession  of  the  Oriental  Catholic  Chnrch.     In  this, 
the  doctrines  of  the  Church  are  simply  presented  in  the  manner  and  style  of 
the  ancient  Church ;  but  in  accordance  also  with  the  latent  developments  they 
^  gradually  attained,  and  as  the  reception  of  it  was  ranked  among  the  three 
f^inal  theological  virtues,  it  has  become  prominent  in  the  practical  system 
^^  the  Church,  (d)    The  accession  of  the  false  Demetrius  to  the  throne  of  the 
Tftirs  vas  favored  by  the  Poles  on  the  ground  of  its  being  a  Catholic  enter- 
I'lae,  and  failed  at  Moscow  (1606)  principally  for  the  same  reason.  (<?)     Ger- 


")  JCtiram$in  vol  IX.  p.  181.        h)  Ant  Poaaetini  .Moscovia.  (VUu.  15S«.)  Antu.  1587. 
irar   ^^^"^  ^'  privilegia  gcnti  IZuthenao  oath,  a  M.  Pontificibus  Poloniaeque  Kcgibos  conceflsa.  Lemb. 

^    0^iiSo|or  buoKoyick  rris    iri<rT€«s   t^s    kcA,   koX  hucotrr.  ^kkK,  T^f    kvaro>  ktis. 
IXimrnw  p.  6«.) 

*)  ^ilii,  U.  dl  M»sco\ia.  p.  llaa.  G.  F.  Mueller,  Samml  rusa.  Oescblchten.  Petersb  1782m.  vol.  V. 
^aram^in  voL  X.  p.  109aflL  [M.  Mcrimee,  The  Bosa.  Impoetors,  or  The  False  Demetrioa.  Lend.  1S52. 8.] 

81 


482  MODERN  CnURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  V.    A.  D.  161T-1«48. 

man  colonists,  Protestant  as  well  as  Catholic,  sometimes  entered  Russia,  and 
enjoyed  fall  liberty  with  respect  to  private  religion,  bat  seldom  possessed  the 
privilege  of  holding  public  worship.  (/) 

§  405.    Abymnians  and  Maronites, 

Job.  Ludotjl  n.  aethiopiou  Fret  16^1.  f.  k,  Gmt  ad  H.  aetb.  Frcf.  1691.  t  VfywierB  de  la  Croce, 
n.  do  Chr.  d'Ethiopie  et  <rArmenlc.  Haye.  178"^  Danz.  1740.  Ck)nip.  C.  W.  Is^herg^  Abess.  a.  d.  er. 
Mission,  bearb.  v.  C.  J.  Kitx«ch^  Bonn.  19-tt.  2  \o\%.—Schnurrer^  de  Ecc  Maroniticn.  Tab.  1910a.  S 
P.  4  (Archlv.  f.  KOesch.  vol.  I.  sect.  1.)  N".  Murad^  Notice  hist  aar  I'oriplne  de  la  nation  Mar.  et 
Bar  sea  rapports  avec  la  France.  Par.  ISU.    \J.  LudolphuHy  IL  of  Ethiopia.  Lnnd.  IGSO.  f.] 

The  attempt  made  by  the  Roman  Church  to  make  up  for  its  losses  in  the 
"West  by  a  reconciliation  with  the  Oriental  churches,  was  encouraged  for  only 
transitory  and  selfish  purposes,  or  was  used  to  conceal  real  designs.  The  only 
country  which  appeared  to  come  up  to  a  sincere  union  with  the  Roman 
Church  was  Ahyasinm,  As  a  Christian  land,  this  country  had  been  almost 
forgotten  by  European  nations,  and  the  Judaizing  Christianity  which  once 
prevailed  there  had  now  sunk  so  low  as  to  be  nothing  more  than  a  system  of 
magic.  The  Emperor  Seltam  Seghed  was  induced,  by  his  peculiar  relations  to 
the  Portuguese,  to  break  off  the  connection  of  the  Abyssinian  Church  with 
the  Coptic  Patriarch  of  Alexandria  (1621),  and  to  accept  of  a  Jesmt  from 
Rome  as  the  patriarch  of  that  Church.  But  the  displeasure  created  by  thfe 
movement  was  so  much  increased  by  the  influence  of  the  hermits  and  monks 
that  it  soon  amounted  to  an  insurrection,  during  which  the  Jesuits  were  ban- 
ished, and  all  connection  with  Rome  was  broken  off  (1634).  The  Maranitet 
still  remained  in  connection  with  the  Roman  Church,  as  the  possession  of 
their  own  patriarch,  the  use  of  their  sacred  language,  the  marriage  of  their 
priests,  the  reception  of  the  cup  in  the  Tx)rd's  Supper,  and  their  other  sacred 
usages,  had  been  conceded  to  them.  Their  college  at  Rome  (after  1584)  be- 
came an  emporium  for  all  kinds  of  Syrian  and  Western  learning. 

/)  J.  C  Grotf  Bemerkungon  Ql  d.  Rel.  Frolh.  d.  Aasl^nder  im  mas.  Reicb.  Petersb.  n.  Lpz.l797Hi 
8to1& 


SIXTH    PERIOD. 


FROM  THE  PEACE  OF  WE3TPIIA.LIA  TO  THE  PRESENT  TIME. 

L  AcU  bi.«tnrioo-ecc  Wolm.  1786-n5a  24  vols.  Nova  Acta  List  ecc  W.  175S-7&  12  vols.  Act* 
bUL  eoGL  nooCri  tempi  W.  1774-S7.  12  vol&  Rep.  d.  nst  KOesch.  (Index  to  all  the  preceding.)  W. 
IiMl  Acten,  Urkunden  a.  Nachr.  z.  nst  KOesch.  W.  1789-98.  5  vols.  Neoesta  Rel.  Qai^h.  ed,  by 
Walek,  Lenig.  1771-S.^  9  vols.  Fortge?.  v.  PUinch,  L.  17S7-93.  8  vols.  U  Btet^  Maj;.  d.  Siaaten-a. 
KGcsch.  Uliii.  1771-8%.  10  vols.  (K«>tor.)  Die  nst  Rel.  Begtbonholten.  Gleas.  1778-95. 19  vols.  UtnlM: 
Arcblv.  C  fL  nst  KOesch.  Weitn.  1794-9.  6  vols.  Rel.  Anna!.  Brnschw.  lSOO-2.  6  St  u.  Beitrr.  z.  nst 
Geseh.  iL  Rel.  Brl  180«u  2  vols.  Arch! v.  f  alte  n.  neae  KOesch.  ed.  by  Sldudlin  \l  Taachirner  L. 
1918-22.  6  vols.  Vater,  Anbau  z.  nst  KG.  Brl,  1820s.s.  2  vols.  Stdudlin,  Tz«(rhlrn*,r  u.  VaUr,  Klllst 
Archlr.  Hal.  1S28-8.  4  volst  Acta  hist  ecc  Saec  XIX.  (1S85.  86.  87.)  ed.  by  RheiMcaVL  ILimb. 
ISSS-^a— Archives  du  Christianisme.  Gen.  et  Par.  since  1S17.  Allg.  KZeltnng,  Darmst.  etl.  by  E.  Zim- 
iMrmann  since  1S22,  by  K.  Zimm^rmann  u.  BreUchneider  since  1S88,  by  Palmer  fince  1850,  and 
by  Schenkel  since  1353.  £v.  KZeitting.  Brl.  ed.  by  IhngifUnherg  since  1S27.  Zeitachr.  f.  hi<<t  Theol. 
LfKL  ed.  by  JUgtn  since  1832.  v.  NUdner  since  1846.  Berliner  allg.  KZeitunp,  ed.  by  Rhfintcald 
ilnee  1688.  v.  Brun*.  184'i. — Jnno  1858.  Among  the  polit  Journals,  especially  the  Angsb.  allg.  and  the 
Lelpric,  more  recently  Deutsche,  allg.  Zeitung. 

IL  J.  A.  €.  EinetM^  KOesch.  d.  18.  Jahrh.  Lps.  (177688.)  1732s&  8  vols.  J.  R.  SchUgel^  KOesch. 
4  18.  Jhh.  Ileilb.  178458. 2  vols,  a  v.  Fraan,  8  vols.  1  Abth.  (Both  as  Ucbers.  u.  Forta  v.  of  MoHhelm.) 
P.  JL  V.  nut\  KOesclu  d.  18  Jhh.  Ang^b.  1807ss.  2  vols.  Unparth.  KOesch.  A.  u.  N.  T.  v.  Tlfintiu* 
Aoth.  Jen.  1735-60,  2-4  vols.  Jlagenliach :  Wesen  a.  Gcioch.  d.  Ref.  4  vols.  Lps.  1S:39,  Die  KOesch. 
d.  1&  a.  19.  Jahrh.  Lps.  (1842a.)  1S4SSw  2  vtAA.—Rofjiano,  Oontlnuatlon  de  Tllist  do  IVgl.  dc  Beranlt- 
Bercastel,  1721-1S80.  Par.  1886.  4  voK  Nenoste  Oe^h.  d.  K.  Chr.  1800-«8.  from  the  Ital.  8  ed.  Angsb. 
(ISSte.  1S36)  1841.  6  vols.  F.  A.  Scharpff,  VoWess.  (L  neucste  KOesch.  (hince  1789.)  Freib.  1852.— 
Grigoire^  H.  de  Bectes  religieases  depais  lo  coramoncemcnc  du  sieclo  dcrnior.  Par.  (ISIO.  2  volt.) 
lS28sa.5voK  In  the  abstract  by  Tt«chirn€r  {KrchKy.  f.  KOof«ch.  1S13.  vol.  I.  i>t  Ls.)  StdudUn. 
WiggeriL  (p.  5.) — F.  C.  SchlosM^r,  Oesch.  d.  IS  JalirU  u.  d,  19.  b.  z,  Sturz  d.  franz.  Kalserr.  Heidlb. 
19)6-44.  5  vols,  till  1797.  (The  '.r.-noral  view  of  lS2J<  is  rt' vised  in  the  1st  &  2d  vol.  of  the  8d  e<L  1848.) 
lScKU>s»er'$  Hist  of  the  ISlh  and  a  part  of  the  19th  centt  has  been  transl.  by  Z>.  Dacidson,  Lend. 
1^  6  vols.  8.  ^m.  Russell,  Alison,  De  Koch,  Lord  John  Rassell,  and  Rauiner,  have  written  His- 
^ries  of  Europe  during  this  period.] 

§  406,     Oerural  View. 

As  the  violence  of  the  struggles  occAsioned  by  the  Reformation  was  now 

xnuch  abated,  the  secular  tendency  of  the  public  life  which  had  alre^idy  be- 

C3ome  prominent  in  the  departments  of  art  and  literature^  now  extended  its 

l.nfluence  wherever  it  could  properly  find  place.    The  efforts  of  public  men 

"vrere  at  first  confined  to  the  enterprises  of  the  princes  to  maintain  the  balance 

of  power,  i.  e.,  each  state  gained  as  large  conquests  as  the  power  and  jealousy 

of  other  states  would  permit.     The  result  of  these  contests  was  the  division 

^f  the  Southern  States  of  Europe  between  the  two  Houses  of  ilapsbnrg  and 

Xk)iirbon,  the  violent  interference  of  Russia  in  all  the  national  assemblies  of 

Western  Europe,  the  intellectual  and  military  elevation  of  Prussia^  the  naval 

flopremacy  of  Great  Britain,  and  the  partition  of  Poland.    But  the  Btnigc^e 


484  MODERN  CUURCH  HISTORY     PER.  VL    A.  D.  ie4S-18B8. 

for  national  liberties  which  had  commenced  in  England  and  the  Netherlands 
simnltaneously  with  the  Reformation,  became,  through  the  influence  of  the 
North  American  Revolution,  the  grand  idea  of  the  age,  and  by  means  of  the 
French  Kcvt>lution  tlio  central  point  of  all  public  affairs.  The  Church  was 
deeply  affected  by  these  convulsions,  no  longer,  however,  as  the  first,  but  only 
as  the  second  of  those  powers  which  were  involved  in  these  popular  move- 
ments. Its  work  now  was  to  assist  the  people,  sympathize  with  them,  and 
administer  consolatiim.  Indeed,  within  its  own  pale  was  completed  the  same 
struggle  which  was  reserved  for  the  wliole  world,  a  conflict  between  religious 
independence  and  ancestral  usages.  Three  great  periods  are  distinctly 
marked  out  by  the  gi*eat  crisis  of  this  struggle ;  the  supplanting  of  ancient 
usages  until  near  the  middle  of  the  eighteenth  century,  the  overthrow  of 
the  existing  state  of  things  until  1814,  and  the  renewal  of  the  struggle  in  its 
most  earnest  form  and  the  commencement  of  an  adjustment  of  attairs  until 
1853.  Still  the  mathematical  limits  assigned  to  intellectual  influences  conld 
not  be  more  importiint  than  the  active  elements  originated  during  this  pe- 
riod, or  those  which  attained  to  a  complete  sphere  of  activity.  Both  the 
original  forms  of  the  Western  Church  passed  through  this  contest,  not  so 
much  in  conflict  with  each  other  as  each  by  themselves,  sfTuggling  with  their 
own  internal  forces.  Germany  was  the  speci  il  battle-field  of  Protestantism, 
and  France  of  Catholicism. 


CHAP.  I.— THE  PROTESTANT  EVANGELICAL  CHURCH  UNTIL  1760. 

§  407.     German  Orthodoxy. 

Among  those  who  belonged  to  the  school  of  the  strictest  faith  there  were 
still  some  persons  of  eminence  who  showed  that  they  were  truly  sincere  in 
their  efforts  to  live  a  life  of  piety.  An  example  of  an  excellent  Christian 
prince  was  especially  presented  in  the  life  of  Ernest  the  Pious  (1601-75), 
who,  with  a  royal  solicitude  worthy  of  St.  Louis,  healed  the  wounds  inflicted 
on  his  people  during  the  thirty  years*  war ;  and  not  only  in  the  spirit  of  his 
theologians,  but  in  the  higher  spirit  of  an  apostle,  labored  aflTectionately  for 
the  welfare  of  the  Church  at  home  and  abroad,  {a)  His  brother,  John  Fred- 
eric^ on  the  other  hand,  who  doubted  the  existence  of  a  God,  but  believed 
in  that  of  the  devil,  in  consequence  of  the  secret  rancor  and  proselyting  zeal 
of  the  theologians,  fell  a  victim  to  the  darkest  influences  of  the  popular  faith 
(1628),  (b)  rivalling  even  that  of  the  Catholic  countries  of  that  period,  in  its 
zeal  for  burning  witches.  Paul  Oerhardt  (d.  1676),  who  committed  his  way 
to  God,  and  betook  himself  to  foreign  countries,  because  his  tender  conscience 
would  not  allow  him  to  remain  in  Berlin,  where  his  Lutheranism  was  in  dan- 
ger, was  the  first  of  a  vast  chorus  of  harmonious  voices  to  express  the  emo— 


a)  OeWke^  Ilorzog  Ernst  d.  Fr.  Gutha  1810.  8  Tola.  comp.  /funniu9^  Consaluth^  ob  and  wi« 
die  in  d.  lutli.  K.  schwebcnden  R.  Streitigk.  bcilegen  mOge.  LflLb.  (1682.)  168a 

b)  A  RU&,  Job.  Friedricb  VI.  Netut  1S2T. 


J 

i 


CHAP.  L  EVANO.  CHURCH.    §407.  P.  QEBHARDT.  485 

tions  of  the  Christian  heart  in  all  its  relations  to  God,  by  popular  hymns,  (e) 
Bat  the  German  Protestantism  of  that  period  gave  forth  its  sublimest  utter- 
ance in  the  severe,  but  harmonious  and  seraphic  music  of  John  Sebastian 
Bach  (d.  1750),  the  chorister  of  Leipsic.  Though  contented  in  the  contracted 
sphere  of  domestic  life,  he  longed  correctly  to  convey  to  others  the  unuttera- 
ble feelings  which  were  struggling  in  his  own  heart.  The  Passion-Oratorios 
which  he  composed  were  the  direct  offspring  of  the  Protestant  mode  of  wor- 
ship. Contemporary  with  him  was  Handel  (d.  1759),  whose  ambition  was 
displayed  both  in  private  life,  and  in  the  style  of  his  art,  whose  works  are  of 
the  richest  and  most  brilliant  character,  and  in  whase  celebration  of  the  Mes- 
siah was  employed  an  array  of  musical  instruments  which  had  never  before 
been  collected.  Both  composers  lived  in  seclusion,  but  were  highly  honored 
daring  their  lives,  {d)  In  consequence  of  the  war,  however,  and  the  exclu- 
sive prevalence  of  an  orthodoxy  confined  to  the  strict  letter  of  the  standard?, 
there  was  nothing  whatever  of  literature,  or  of  its  popular  elements  during 
this  period.  The  theology  of  the  Form  of  Concord  was  developed  entirely 
in  a  controversial  style  with  reference  to  opposing  systems,  and  might  be 
ealled  a  new  scholasticism,  without  the  philosophical  acuteness  of  the  old. 
This  orthodoxy  may  have  been  the  language  of  sincere  piety,  but  it  was  vio- 
lently maintained  by  means  of  a  contracted  education,  by  an  unscientific 
course  of  instruction,  by  oaths,  and  by  censorships.  As  every  deviation  from 
it  was  closely  watched  and  threatened,  all  intellectual  movements  became 
constrained,  and  were  animated  only  when  engaged  in  controversy,  and  in 
accosations  for  heresy.  Even  Calovius,  Koenig,  and  Quenstedt,  who  were 
leaders,  only  transcribed  the  productions  of  their  predecessors,  and  of  each 
other.  But  with  all  their  subtilties  one  can  scarcely  refrain  from  thinking 
that  they  have  described  God  very  much  like  some  mighty  Lutheran  pastor 
who  is  obliged  to  save  his  honor  by  blows,  {e)  The  authority  of  the  Scrip- 
tures was  actually  felt  only  through  certain  passages  much  used  in  contro- 
versy, the  explanation  of  which  was  firmly  settled  by  each  party  for  itsel£ 
The  pure  and  powerful  prose  which  Luther  had  used  was  forgotten,  men  of 
learning  wrote  in  a  tolerable  Latin,  and  the  sermons,  though  sometimes  pow- 
erfnl,  unrestrained,  and  alarming,  were  generally  disputatious,  allegorical, 
insipid,  pedantic,  or  ordinary.  (/)  Orthodoxy,  and  the  most  unwearied  eccle- 
siasticism,  were  compatible  with  a  worldly  spirit  and  the  rudest  manners. 
The  zealots  for  orthodoxy  assailed  each  other  with  reference  to  some  atten- 
uated definitions  of  subjects  which  lay  beyond  the  bounds  of  human  knowl- 
edge, (g)  and  the  exhortation  to  unity  in  essentials,  freedom  in  non-essentials, 
and  charity  in  both,  was  only  as  a  voice  in  the  desert.  (Ji) 


e)  X,  G.  Both,  P.  0.  Lp9w  1829.  E.  C.  Langlecksr,  Lebon  a.  Leiden.  P.  G.  Bri.  1&41.  0.  SchuU, 
P.  O.  gcistL  Andachten.  Brl  1S42. 

d)  Forkel^  Lcben  J.  8.  Bachs.  Li>s.  1S04  4  {C.  Bumey^  Memoirs  of  Handel,  and  also  by  the 
•MM,  Gen.  Hist  of  Music,  Lond.  177ft-S9.  4  vnla.  a,  condense  by  T,  BiUby,  Lond.  1819.  2  vols.  8.] 

tf)  naritnann^  v.  8<!«g(>n8preclien.  Numb.  16S0.  p.  158.  ISO. 

/)  SchuUr^  Gescb.  d.  Geschmacks  im  Pred.  Hal.  1792.  vol.  I.  p.  165s8. 

g)  A.  Thauck :  D.  Gel5t  d.  lath.  Theologen  Witt  im  17.  Jhh.  Umb.  1S52.  D.  akad.  Leben  d.  17. 
Jbh.  UaL  15.^1. 

h)  F.  LUeke^  Q.  Alter,  Yerf  orspr.  Form  n.  Sinn  das  kirohl  Frladenwpraobos,  GOtt  1S50. 


486  MODERN  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  VL    A.  D.  1648-1888L 

§  408.     George  Calixtm.     1586-1656. 

De  CAnsa  hodiorni  odil  pbllosc  et  solidae  eradSt  Helimt  1619.  Epit  Theol  Him.  1619.  St  oflea. 
Commercii  liter.  Calixt.  Fa5c  1-3.  ed.  E.  llenkf^  Hal.  Jen.  Marb.  1S83-40.— CVi^r<i  H.  eyncrctistiea 
it  I.  chr.  Bedonkon  u.  d.  lieben  KFrlwIen.  Ifi32  conflscirt  (Gless.)  16S5.  4.  HotW,  Cimbrla  llt*r. 
IlafV).  1744.  f.  Th.  III.  j).  121sa.  E.  Ifenkti,  d.  Unlr.  Holmst  Im  16  Jhh.  Hnl.  1S88L  - FVi^dk,  K.  Str 
ToL  I.  p.  216«s.  IV,  66C-HS.  Ptonck,  GeKh.  d.  prot  Th.  t.  d.  Konkordicnt  p.  90aa.  //  Schmid,  Oeecfa. 
(i  »ynkrct  »trcitif;k.  in  d.  Zelt  d.  Cal  Erl  1S16.     W.  Gasa,  Cal  a.  d.  SynkreL  Brl.  1SI6. 

The  University  of  Ilehnstadt  had  been  accidentally  exempted  from  the 
operation  of  the  Form  of  Concord,  (§  851,)  and  by  the  protection  which  ita 
princes  had  afforded  it,  it  became  for  a  long  time  an  asylnm  for  the  Homanistfli 
Here  contemptuous  language  with  respect  to  human  reason  and  philosophy, 
Bucli  Q»  was  ventured  upon  by  Daniel  Hoffmann^  was  punished  as  an  offence 
against  the  philosophical  faculty,  {a)  From  this  school  sprung  CalixtuSy  an 
upright  and  extensively  educated  man,  who,  for  nearly  half  a  century  was  a 
professor  in  Ilelmstadt,  where,  in  the  spirit  of  Melancthon,  be  sought  in  the 
historical  method  for  a  more  unfettered  form  of  theology.  By  his  doctrine 
of  the  necessity  of  good  works,  by  his  separation  of  ethics  from  theology, 
and  by  his  assertion  that  the  doctrine  of  the  Trinity  was  not  plainly  revealed 
in  the  Old  Testament,  suspicions  of  his  orthodoxy  were  awakened,  first 
among  his  pupils  at  Koenigsberg,  and  finally  led  to  a  denial  of  an  honorable 
burial  to  his  lifeless  remains.  He  endeavored  to  strengthen  the  power  of  the 
Protestants  in  Thorn  by  a  fraternal  connection  with  the  members  of  the  Re- 
formed Church  (p.  420.)  He  was  regarded  by  the  Catholics  as  their  most 
sagacious  oj)ponent,  and  the  whole  Catholic  Church  of  Germany  was  invited 
by  him  to  escape  from  the  power  of  the  pope.  But  he  had  become  ac- 
quainted with  a  Christianity  unfettered  by  the  subtleties  of  the  Form  of  Con- 
cord, and  made  known  in  the  Scriptures,  in  the  primitive  Ghurch,  and  id 
Christian  experience.  Conscious  that  he  had  thus  attained  a  universal  Chris- 
tianity, he  demanded  that  the  various  churches  should  recognize  it,  and 
thought  that  they  might  once  more  be  united,  or  at  least  might  mutually  tole- 
rate each  other,  if  they  could  all  be  induced  to  return  to  the  oecumenical 
symbols  and  laws  of  the  first  five  centuries.  This  plan  was  called  by  the  zeal- 
ous Lutherans  Syncreti»m,  C<iIorius,  an  exasperated  but  honest  watchman 
of  Zion,  with  his  colleagues  in  Luther's  chair,  furiously  and  indefatigably  as- 
sailed this  heresy  of  one  whom  they  regarded  as  a  papist  and  Mamoluke,  who 
should  be  cut  off  from  the  body  of  the  Church  by  a  new  creed,  (b)  But 
Holmstadt  adhered  to  it^  beloved  instructor,  he  was  also  protected  by  hn 
prince^  and  Jena  protested  against  the  unreasonable  reproaches  of  his  adver- 
saries, (c)  These  reproaches  wore  supposed  to  be  justified  by  his  assertion 
that  the  Reformation  was  merely  a  particular  mode  of  return  to  the  ancient 
Church,  and  by  the  references  made  to  him  by  many  then  going  over  to  the 

a)  De  Boo  et  Chr.  Hlmst  1.%9S.  On  the  other  band:  J.  Martini  YermmnspitgeU  ^  i  Bericbl.. 
was  d.  Vft.  t>ammt  dr^  rerfectlon,  Phil.  sey.  Witt  161SL— (7.  TTiomaHttit  d«  eontror.  IIoAoannlan^ 
ErL  l&4i 

b)  Con!»enflas  rcpetitns  fldel  vere  Lntheranae.  1665.  (Conailia  tbeoL  Wltt«nb.  Frkt  1661  C  toI  U) 
Denno  ed.  E  L.  T.  mnke^  Marb.  1W6.  4. 

c)  MmaeuB^  want  Erkl  (L  98  Termeinte  ReL  Fragen.  Jen.  1677. 


CHAP.  L    KVANG.  OHUBCH.    §  ^08.  CALIXTUS.    S  409.  8PENES.  487 

Catholic  Oharch.  He  was  mnch  respected  by  the  higher  classes,  and  his 
repntation  at  home  was  much  increased  by  the  honors  which  he  gained  in 
foreign  countries.  His  inflnence  upon  the  theology  of  his  own  times  was  al- 
most imperceptible,  bat  ho  seemed  rather  a  type  of  what  was  about  to  pre- 
vail in  the  aacceeding  age. 

§  409.     Fietism.    Spener,     1636-1705. 

L  Spatter:  Das  getotl.  Priestertb.  Frkf.  1677. 12.  and  oth.  Brl  1S30.  Allg  GoUcftgel.  allor  glSab. 
Chr.  a.  rcchtsch.  Thcol.  Frkf.  1680. 12.  at.d  often.  Die  Freib.  d.  Qlunbigvn  v.  Anschn  d.  Men^chen 
In  Olaobenssacb.  Frkf.  1691.  TheoL  Bedenken.  Hal.  1700m.  4  voK  Concilia  et  Jud.  th.  Frcf.  1709. 
8  vula.  4  tsL  u.  deatKb«  th.  Bed.  in  zdtgnm.  Au.sw.  v.  llenniek^^  IIul  1S3S.  Wabrh.  Erzuh).  defl- 
leo,  was  wcgen  d.  sogcn.  Plot  yor;:egAnKon.  Frkf.  (1697.)  1C9S.  Ainst  1700.  12.— /.<>cAor,  Timotb. 
Verinus.  Witt  1718fl8.  2  vols.  u.  Tides  In  d.Un5chuM.  Nathrr.  1701-20.  Work  written  to  compose  th« 
strife  of  parties:  {Buddtus)  Wahrb.  u.  grundl.  Erz^bl  was  zw.  d.  sog.  Pict  gescbebcn.  Witnoat 
place.  1710. 

IL  C.  lf.T.  CannUin^  Muster  e.  rccbtsob.  Lehrers  in  d.  Lebcn  Sp.  Hal.  17iO.  SuabedUsen^  Sp. 
(Bocblitz,  Jibrl.  Mittb.  \<'m.  vol.  III.)  W.  HosHlnuh,  Sp.  u.  s.  Zdt  Brl.  (IS28.)  ed.  by  G.  Schtoeder, 
1853.  2  vols.  Knapp^  Leben  n.  Char,  elni^cr  fh)niincn  u.  gel.  Mtlnner  d.  vor.  Jhb.  Hal.  1829. —  W. 
ThUa,  Spu  als  Katecbot  Brl  \%Vi.—  Walch,  K.  Str.  vol.  I.  p.  MOsa.  II,  Iss.  IV,  1030^  V,  Isol 
Planeh,  Gesch.  d.  prot.  Th.  p.  ISOs.^.  [A  new  Life  of  Si>encr  bas  been  announced  as  in  prepwatioa 
bj  K.  HortbacK  in  2  vols.  Lim.  18A4.]    Deutsche  Zeitscb.  f.  cbr.  W.  1S58.  N.  28a. 

Philip  Jacob  Sj/ener  received  a  picas  and  liberal  education  in  the  city  of 
Strasbourg,  and  while  yet  a  youth  became  the  first  among  the  clergy  in 
Frankfort  (1666).  He  subsequently  became  the  superior  court  preacher  in 
Dresden  (1686),  but  fell  into  disgrace  on  account  of  his  zenl  as  a  confessor, 
and  was  appointed  (1091)  Provost  in  Berlin.  He  was  deeply  impressed  with 
the  conviction  that  practical  piety  was  in  danger  of  being  lost  in  a  conform- 
ity to  the  outward  letter  of  Christianity.  By  devotional  explanations  of  the 
Scriptures,  and  Christian  conversation  in  private  religious  meetings  (collegia 
pietatis,  after  1670),  a  high  degree  of  religious  earnestness  was  awakened. 
His  "Pious  Desires"  (a)  encouraged  the  hope  of  reforming  the  corrupt 
Church.  In  that  work  he  showed  that  the  Church  should  be  once  more 
built  np  under  the  influence  of  the  Scriptures,  that  the  spiritual  priesthood 
of  the  congregation  should  be  restored,  and  that  the  clergy  slioidd  be  edu- 
cated to  live  a  life  of  personal  godliness.  Then  Christianity  would  be 
preached  in  apostolical  simplicity,  and  become  a  religion  of  the  heart  and  of 
daily  conduct.  In  Leipsic,  where  the  exposition  of  the  Scriptures  had  long 
been  discontinued,  a  society  of  educated  young  men  was  formed  under  the 
influence  of  Spener,  for  the  scientific  explanation  and  practical  application  of 
the  Scriptures  (July  18,  1687).  (b)  The  German  devotional  lectures  upon  the 
Kew  Testament  ojKjned  (1089)  by  three  men  who  had  obtained  the  degree 
of  Magister,  among  whom  was  Aug.  Herm.  Francle^  were  attended  with 
great  diligence  by  large  numbers  of  students  and  citizens.  On  account  of 
their  excessive  displays  of  piety  in  their  outward  conduct,  these  persons  were 
called  Fietists^  and  were  accused  of  aiming  to  bring  public  worship  and  sci- 
ence into  contempt.  They  were  therefore  compelled  by  the  theologians  to 
leave  Leipsic  (1690),  and  in  connection  with  Thomasius  they  founded  a  new 

a)  Pla  de^tderla  o.  hertzl  Yerlangen  nach  gottgefall.  Bessemng  d.  wahren  er.  K.  (First  pubL  M 
•  praef  to  Arndi's  Postilla  ev.  1675)  Frkf.  1675.  lat  Frkf  1678.  12. 

b)  C  F.  Ittgen^  Hist  Collegll  pbUobiblici  Lips.  Lps.  1886iL  8  P.  4. 


488  MODERN  CnUBCH  HISTOBT.    FEB.  YL    A.  D.  ie4fr-180& 

salt-spring  at  Halle  (1691).  Aftor  the  first  exhibitions  of  popular  favor  had 
passed  away,  the  rigid  demands  which  Spener  made  in  behalf  of  morality, 
and  his  liberal  bnt  logical  system  of  doctrines,  raised  np  agaiEst  him  many 
opponents  not  only  among  the  worldly  classes,  but  among  the  orthodox. 
Once  more  Wittenberg,  now  enfeebled  by  age,  defended  its  Lutheranism,  {c) 
and  the  theology  of  the  schools  with  almost  one  voice  exclaimed  against 
Pietism  as  against  a  new  sect.  The  controversy,  however,  was  carried  on  not 
by  seizing  and  attacking  the  thing  itself,  but  according  to  the  polemical  fash- 
ion of  the  times,  by  accusing  it  of  many  erroneous  sentiments,  and  enlisting 
in  petty  quarrels  against  it  the  passions  of  the  people,  the  civil  courts,  and 
even  the  divine  decisions.  Those  tendencies  which  had  been  originated  by 
Spener,  but  which  had  been  kept  within  due  limits  by  the  mildness  of  his 
disposition,  were  soon  carried  to  an  extreme  by  his  followers.  They  con- 
tended that  all  true  regeneration  must  be  preceded  by  a  high-wrought  peni- 
tential conflict,  that  none  but  a  regenerated  divine  should  be  allowed  to  min- 
ister in  holy  things,  a  proud  sectarian  spirit  was  awakened,  injury  was  done 
to  the  serious  pursuit  of  literature  by  the  pure  devotional  form  which  theol- 
ogy then  assumed,  some  were  led  to  indulge  in  enthusiastic  hopes  of  a  mil- 
lennial kingdom,  and  of  the  final  extinction  of  hell,  {iJ)  and  many  high- 
sounding  pious  expressions  were  introduced  which  really  had  no  meaning.  It 
must,  however,  not  be  forgotten  that  the  Orphan  House  was  the  result  of 
Francke's  pietism,  and  will  ever  commemorate  the  triumph  of  his  faith  in 
God  and  his  benevolence  toward  men.  {e)  As  soon,  however,  as  the  opposi- 
tion began  gradually  to  abate  (after  1720),  the  energy  as  well  as  the  free 
reforming  spirit  of  Pietism  was  gone,  and  it  appeared  to  be  merely  a  languid 
religion  of  feeling,  which,  while  it  shrunk  from  every  semblance  of  worldly 
pleasure  and  splendor,  regarded  Christianity  under  the  single  aspect  of  a  sys- 
tem which  proclaimed  the  naturally  miserable  state  of  man  in  consequenoe 
of  sin,  and  the  necessity  of  justification  through  the  expiatory  death  of 
Christ.  Protestantism,  by  its  influence,  penetrated  the  hearts  of  men  more 
profoundly,  and  the  pious  morality  of  domestic  life  was  strengthened  by  it, 
but  especially  in  the  courts  of  some  of  the  inferior  princes  it  degenerated 
into  a  miserable  system  of  legahty  and  ceremony  before  God.  Registers 
were  kept  for  souls,  and  many  idle  persons  supported  themselv^  comfort- 
ably by  using  the  new  language  respecting  breaking  into  the  kingdom,  and 
the  sealing  of  believers,  while  serious-minded  persons  were  utterly  unfitted 
for  their  ordinary  social  duties,  until  in  despair  they  committed  suicide.  (/) 
The  orthodox,  on  the  other  hand,  in  their  opposition  to  such  fanaticism,  gave 
their  countenance  to  an  extraordinary  degree  of  cheerfulness,  and  thought 
the  condition  of  their  Church  was  remarkably  flourishing,  {g) 


r)  ChrlAtlutb.  Yorat  in  aafricht.  Lehrsntzson  n.  Gottos  Wort  n.  d.  symb.  KBCkehcm  a.  nnrieb' 
tigen  Gogensfitzen  aas  H.  Dr.  Sponer's  Scbrr.  Witt  1695. 

d)  J.  W.  Petfriffi^  Mv<n"fipiov  inroKciTcurrda'ttos  ircirrwv,  d.  L  GchcimiL  d.  Wlederbr.  tSln 
Dinge.  Offenb.  UOls^  8  vols. 

e)  A.  II.  Francke.  hy  A.  H  Ki^me^fer,  Ilal  1794  by  Guerike,  Hal.  182T. 

f)  S^mler,  I^bensbeschr.  vol  L  p.  47t«. 

g)  Uwtshach  vol.  II.  p.  126.     Tholuek,  Geiat  d.  lath.  Th.  p.  272aa.  274 


CHAP.  L    EVANG.  OUURCH.    1 410.  PHILOSOPnT.    LEIBNITZ.  489 

§  410.    Philo9ophieal  Influences,     Cartesius  to  Wolf. 

Although  science  received  from  the  hand  of  Ricon  of  Verulam  (d.  1626) 
a  tendency  toward  physics  and  the  useful  arts,  (a)  many  divines  long  thought 
it  absurd  to  concede  an  authority  to  Copernicus  which  was  superior  to  that  of 
the  word  of  God.  (h)  The  more  modern  philosophy  had  its  origin  with  Des 
Carter  (d.  1650),  in  an  inquiry  proceeding  from  doubt,  after  something  abso- 
lutely true  and  certain,  and  which  the  reflecting  mind  might  find  in  itself 
alone,  without  reference  to  theology.  It  was,  however,  employed  in  the 
Netherlands  for  the  representation  of  the  doctrines  of  revelation,  and  took 
the  place  of  the  formulae  of  Aristotle.  The  consciousness  of  a  knowledge 
of  God  which  from  its  own  nature  was  satisfactory,  was  awakened  there  by 
this  philosophy,  but  as  it  soon  became  suspected  of  political  liberalism,  it  was 
prohibited  by  the  Orange  party  (after  1650).  (c)  Tlie  tragical  philosophy  of 
Spincta  was  founded  on  a  profound  religious  basis  independent  of  all  dog- 
mas, but  Christianity  was  utterly  foreign  to  his  speculations,  and  during  the 
century  in  which  he  lived  he  was  regarded  as  an  atheist,  {d)  In  England, 
the  doctrines  of  a  sound  common  sense  were  reduced  by  Loele  (d.  1704)  to  a 
philosophical  system,  which  asserted  for  the  experience  of  the  senses  at  least 
a  paramount  influence  in  the  intellectual  world,  and  demanded  a  complete 
toleration  for  every  kind  of  religious  opinions.  He  himself,  however,  never 
intended  to  advocate  any  sentiment  inconsistent  with  the  creed  of  his 
Church,  {e)  In  Germany,  Leibnitz^  fully  confiding  in  the  primogeniture  of 
the  human  mind,  rescued  philosophy  from  the  abyss  of  Spinoza  by  defending 
a  free  individuality  originally  determined  only  by  the  prime  monad,  and  a 
necessary  agreement  of  revelation  with  the  everlasting  truths  of  reason.  He 
however  conceded  that  the  historical  mysteries  of  Christianity  were  beyond 
the  reach  of  reason,  and  with  a  character  in  its  special  peculiarities  quite  dif- 
ferent from  the  ordinary  German  spirit,  he  kept  aloof  from  all  ecclesiastical 
controversies.  {/)  His  philosophy  became  intelligible  to  ordinary  minds  by 
the  labors  of  Wolf  (d.  1754),  who,  though  he  lived  in  perfect  harmony  with 
the  Church,  sometimes  demonstrated  its  doctrines  in  a  mathematical  style, 
and  sometimes  allowed  them  to  pass  as  mysteries  adapted  only  to  the  world 
of  sense.    But  on  account  of  the  dread  which  Pietism  displayed  toward  the 

a)  Novnm  Orpinon  SrlentlJinini.  1620.  ed  BrQct.  Lps.  1880.  G/rdrer,  Stuttg.  1S31.  [B(tcon*9 
Not.  Or^,  or  Tnie  6tig)(e>tion!«  for  the  Interpret  of  Nature.  Lond.  1S50.  S.  Also  \n  Works,  8  vols.  8. 
Philad.  ISia    Account  of  Bacon's  Nov.  Org.  in  Lih.  of  Us.  Knowlodf^e.  Lond.  1S27.  8.] 

b)  Calov.  Syst  voL  III.  p.  1033.    IfoUaz.  Exain.  ed.  TelUr,  p.  8C9. 

c)  CurUsii  Opp.  Frcf.  1692*8.  2  vok  4.—J/MtU  Ccnsura.  Par.  16S9.  12.  «1.  4.  1694.  J.  E.  Erd- 
rnana^  Darst  a.  Kritik  d.  Cart  Ph.  Rign.  lS8t.  C.  F.  Hock,  Cart  n.  seine  Gegncr.  Vienna.  1885. 
BordoM  Demouiin^  le  CarU>si.ini»tne.  Par.  1643.  [W.  WhttotU,  Hi»t  of  the  Inductive  Sciences. 
Load.  8  ed.  1647.  8  vola.  8.  TennemanrCt  Manual,  p.  806-&  I!mry'»  Trana).  of  the  Hist  of  PblL 
ToL  IL  p.  4&-«0.] 

«f)  Oppt  ed.  Paulw,  Jen.  1802.  2  vols.  G/rurer,  Stuttg.  1S80.  //  C.  W.  Stfftcart,  d.  Spinoxi- 
nras.  Tub.  1639.  Amand  SainUa^  II.  de  la  vie  et  des  ouvr.  de  8p.  fbndateur  de  Texegese  et  de  la 
phiL  modeme.  Par.  1642. 

«)  Works  of  J.  L.  Lond.  1714.  8  vols.  1821.  9  vols.  [Philoa.  work&  with  prcL  disc  by  SL  John, 
Load.  l&48w  &] 

/)  Opp.  lat  gall,  gcrai.  ed.  Erdmann,  Ber.  lS89s.  2  vols.  A.—L.  Fmerbach,  Darst  u.  Krit  d. 
Lelbn.  Ph  An^p.  1S37.  G.  E.  GuKrau^r,  O.  W.  v.  Lcibn.  BrsL  (1642.)  l»Ul  2  Toi&  A.  IIs^Hch, 
Bpin.  a.  Leibn.  Uomb.  1846w    [J.  M.  MackU,  Life  of  O.  W.  vom  L^  Boston.  1643.  IBmo.] 


490  MODERN  CHUBCH  HI8T0BT.    PKB.  YL    A.  D.  lUS-lSSa 

doctrine  of  a  pre-established  optimism,  and  toward  all  philosophy,  he  was 
driven  from  Ilalle  (1728)  by  the  mandate  of  a  king  who  cared  for  nothing 
but  what  lie  regarded  as  useful.  The  result  ot  this  philosophy,  so  far  as  tho 
Church  wn<^  concerned,  was  a  natural  theology  whose  essential  principles  were 
derived  from  the  Christian  system,  though  it  appeared  to  be  independent  of  all 
revelation.  (.7)  From  this  school  proceeded  the  Wertlieim  version  of  the  Bible, 
an  insipid  and  impudent  attempt  to  present  the  Scriptures  in  a  form  adapted 
to  what  was  said  to  be  the  demands  of  modern  criticism.  The  power  of  tho 
empire  was  found  to  be  still  sufficient  to  suppress  such  a  work  as  this,  (h) 

§  411.     Peaceable  Movements  in  Theology. 

The  French  theologians  contended  for  the  palm  of  criticism  with  the 
learned  monks  of  St.  Maur,  but  they  could  gain  the  prize  only  by  the  unre- 
strained freedom  of  their  historical  inquiries.  Among  the  theologians  of  the 
Academy  of  Saumu}\  Amyrald  (Amyraut,  d.  1064)  taught  that  the  grace  of 
God  was  so  universal  that  it  was  not  withheld  even  from  the  heathen,  and 
yet  in  a  certain  sense  was  limited ;  (a)  Fajon  (d.  1684),  that  its  influence  was 
principally  upon  the  understanding,  through  the  medium  of  the  Scriptores 
and  the  whole  course  of  a  man^s  life;  (b)  Placaeus  (Laplace,  d.  1665),  that 
original  sin  was  a  corruption  to  which  no  guilt  was  attached  nntil  it  had  pro- 
ceeded to  actual  transgression ;  and  Louis  Capellus  (Chapelle,  d.  1658)  justi- 
fied the  freedom  of  his  criticism  upon  the  language  of  Scripture  principally 
in  opposition  to  those  who  maintained  the  divine  origin  of  the  Hebrew  vowel 
points,  (c)  To  defend  their  churches  against  these  liberal  views,  the  Galvin- 
istic  orthodox  divines  urged  upon  the  Swiss  a  new  confession  of  faith  (1675), 
the  legal  influence  of  which,  however,  had  ceased  even  at  the  commencement 
of  tlie  eighteenth  century,  {d)  Cocc^lus  (d.  1669),  who  had  been  educated  in 
t]ie  school  of  Des  Cartes,  demanded  that  theology  should  be  of  a  purely  bib- 
lical character,  since  in  his  estimation  the  Scriptures  were  every  thing  and 
meant  every  thing,  {e)  Many  literary  men  in  France  were  driven,  by  the 
persecutions  endured  by  the  Protestants,  to  foreign  countries,  where  their 
literature  became  the  means  of  their  support ;  and  taking  advantage  of  the 
freedom  of  speech  enjoyed  especially  in  the  Netherlands,  they  addressed 
themselves  in  a  polished  stylo  to  the  educated  classes.  Bayle  (d.  1706)  col- 
lected a  treasure  which  those  who  came  after  him  might  use  either  for  or 

g)  Theol.  nataralis.  Lp3  1736.  2  T0I&  4.— Cane,  Ph.  Lelbn.  et  W.  usas  lo  Th.  Frcf.  «t  L.  (172a) 
1749.  2  vols.  Ludociei,  Entw.  e.  Hist.  d.  Wulf  Ph.  2  ed.  Lpa.  1787.  8  vola.  H.  Wutke^  Cfa.  Wolfs 
dgiie  Lcbensbcffch.  Lj*.  1S41. 

h)  {lA)rfH2  Schtnid,  d.  1751.)  Die  gott).  Schrr.  Tor  deo  Zeften  desMeasle  JesQS.  One  Tbeil  Is  tb* 
hist  of  tlic  Israelites.  Werth.  1735.— .A  A\  Sinnhold,  aust  Hist  d.  sogcn.  Worth.  BibeL  FrkC  1789. 4 

a)  Traitu  de  la  praedest  et  de  sea  prindpes  diffcrenta.  Baam.  1634. — C.  E,  Smignjf^  Moise  Amjr. 
Strasb.  1S49.    A.  ScAiceuer,  M.  A-  {Zeiler't  th.  Jahrbb.  1852.  H.  Is.) 

b)  V.  E.  Loncher,  de  Clandii  PiO-  ^'^^-  ct  fatis.  Lps.  1692.  A.  SchteeiMer,  P^oolsm.  {Zdlm't 
th.  Jalirbb.  1S58.  II.  \<) 

6)  Syntagma  thesium  theoL  in  Acad.  Salmuriensl  dispntatanim  Salm.  (1660.)  1664.  4 
d)  {J.  U.  Ifeid^gger)  Form.  Consensus  Ecc  Holv.  (SUmeyer^  CoL  Conff.  p.  729.)— C  M.  J^^ 
de  F.  (\  Htilv.  Tub.  172a  4.    {Barnaud)  Mem.  pour  senrir  k  Tliist  des  troubles  en  Suisse  4  Tooes- 
slon  du  Cons.  Amtit  1726.    Em:her^  hclv.  Cons,  in  d.  UalL  EncykL  XL  toL  VI.) 

«)  Samma  doctr.  do  foedere  ot  testamentis  Del  L.  B.  164S.— Albert!,  SivAovr  tfJantOf  CarttskB- 
ism  us  et  CocceJ.  deacr.  et  reAitatL  L.  R  167&  i. 


CHAP.  I.    BVANG   CnURCH  TILL  1750.    §411.  BENGEL.    WETT8TEIX.        491 

against  Christianity ;  and  he  himself  was  the  first  specimen  of  that  pecnliar 
style  of  Protestantism  which,  wliile  it  is  zealous  for  truth  and  freedom,  sus- 
pends its  inquiries  at  the  point  where  faith  seems  inconsistent  with  reason, 
and  contents  itself  with  a  statement  of  the  arguments  on  both  sides.  (/)  In 
the  Netherlands  the  Arminian  congregations  began  to  decline,  for  the  spirit 
of  Zwingle  was  now  evidently  reviving  in  all  parts  of  the  Church  there. 
Even  in  England,  where  the  literary  spirit  (Latitudinarianism)  was  especially 
odious  to  the  orthodox  beneficed  clergy,  it  became  extensively  j)revalent,  ])ar- 
ticularly  in  the  diocese  of  Cambridge.  By  its  distinction  between  what  it 
called  essential  and  non-essential  doctrines,  it  evidently  intended  to  draw  a 
line  between  the  doctrines  of  the  Scriptures  and  those  of  the  Church.  The 
Apostles'  Creed  was  presented  as  containing  every  thing  indispensjible  to  sjil- 
vation,  kindness  toward  those  who  differ  from  us  in  opinion  wius  much  insisted 
upon  OS  a  Christian  virtue,  and  a  reconciliation  with  the  dissenters  was  there- 
fore regarded  as  practicable,  (j)  In  (Jormany,  Thomasim  (d.  1728)  became 
connected  with  the  Pietists  because  they  were  oppressed  by  the  established 
Church,  but  they  soon  found  that  the  tendency  of  his  instructions  was  to 
form  a  bold  and  satirical  spirit,  and  he  became  convinced  that  while  they 
professed  to  be  seeking  the  honor  of  God,  they  were  really  influenced  by  a 
desire  for  their  own  honor  and  power.  This  intelligent  German  had  the 
posthumous  reputation  of  having  turned  the  public  mind  against  the  trials 
for  witchcraft,  (h)  and  yet  even  in  the  close  of  the  century  in  which  he  lived 
witches  were  occasionally  put  to  death  in  Upper  Germany.  Pietism  having 
sustained  a  defeat  in  its  conflict  with  the  Wolfian  school  in  the  very  place 
where  it  was  strongest  (1740),  now  betook  itself  discontentedly  to  a  quiet 
obscurity.  During  the  struggle,  however,  even  the  theology  of  the  schools 
had  become  penetrated  by  its  fervent  spirit.  This  was  first  apparent  in  the 
case  of  Buddeus  (d.  1729),  who  was  historically  familiar  with  philosophy,  and 
yet  gave  to  theology  a  simple  and  scientific  form.  John  Albert  Bengel  (d. 
1752),  whose  pious  hopes  were  founded  on  calculations  not  proved  to  be 
erroneous  until  1836,  was  not  deterred  by  them  from  investigating  with  re- 
ligious conscientiousness  the  original  text  and  meaning  of  the  Sacred  Scrip- 
tures, (0  while  WetUUin  (d.  1754)  took  delight  in  critical  labors,  and  without 
regard  to  received  doctrines  endeavored  to  ascertain  which  of  the  innumer- 
able readings  was  the  original  text  of  the  New  Testament,  and  to  illustrate 
it  by  every  thing  resembling  it  in  antiquity.  He  was  never,  however,  per- 
mitted to  pursue  his  labors  to  their  final  results,  for  as  his  criticism  was 
even  then  suspected  of  being  friendly  to  Socinianism,  he  was  deposed  (1730) 
at  Basle,  and  received  with  umch  hesitation  by  the  Arminians.  (l) 


/)  Dicttunnaire  hist  et  crit  Rot  1696.  2  yoIa.  f.  and  often.  Amst  17408a.  4  voK  fl  Nouvellosde  la 
r6p.  des  lettre«.  Amst  16S4-1715.— J/(ii«^ut<;r,  Vie  d.  B.  Amst  1730.  12.  Z.  Ftaerhach^  Pierre  R 
LpcSed.  1$44 

g)  {Arthur  Bury)  The  Naked  0<v«pol.  By  u  true  son  of  the  Chnrcb  of  Engl.  1690.  4.-— /».  Jurieu^ 
hrel.  da  Latitudinairo.  (Roter.  1696.)  Utr.  1697. 

h)  If.  Luden^  ThoinaKlua  nach  s.  Sch{ck.«alen  u.  Schrr.  BrI.  1S05.  A.  Eichttadii  Or.  de  Thorn. 
JeiL  ISSS.  4.     C.  F.  FritMche,  de  rationalisma  Hal  IS^IS.  4.  Cm.  I.  p.  7.w.  IS. 

i)  J.  r.  Burk,  Bongel's  Leben  n.  Wlrken.  Stattg.  (1S81.)  1882,  Bongel's  liter.  Briefwecha,  mlt- 
geth.  T.  Burk,  Stattg.  1886. 

k)  C.  B,  Hagenbach,  J.  J.  Wett»t  n.  seine  Qegner.  (Zeitschr.  f.  hist  T1).  1&S9.  P.  1.) 


492  MODERN  CHUBCH  UI8T0BY.    PER.  VL    A.  D.  1648-lSfi8. 

§  412.     Law  and  Le*jal  Vietc»  in  the  German  Church, 

The  deputies  of  the  Protestont  states  at  tlie  permanent  Diet  of  Ratisbon 
(after  1663)  formed  a  tribunal  (Corpus  Evangelicorum),  which  possessed  no 
real  power,  but  was  designed  to  secure  the  rights  guarantied  by  the  Peace,  (a) 
The  jurisdiction  over  the  individual  national  Cliurches  remained  with  the 
secular  authorities,  and  wjis  exercised  by  the  consistories  and  ministerial  coun- 
cil, with  the  co-operation  of  the  states  of  the  respective  countries,  and,  in 
some  provinces  of  the  Reformed  Church,  with  the  aid  of  the  minor  synods. 
Every  ecclesiastical  usurpation  was  therefore  easily  repelled,  the  Church  was 
sometimes  used  as  a  police  for  the  execution  of  the  laws,  and  the  property  of 
the  Church  was  sometimes  used  for  secular  objects.  The  press  was  the  orly 
organ  by  which  ecclesiastical  privileges  and  wants  were  made  known, ;::«! 
even  this  was  i)laced  under  the  restraints  of  a  censorship.  In  the  literary 
works  of  that  period,  the  fact  that  princes  exercised  so  much  ecclesiastical 
power  is  variously  explained.  When  the  internal  inconsistencies  of  the  epis- 
copal system  (p.  441)  had  become  evident,  the  formation  of  a  Territorial  ty»- 
tern  naturally  followed  from  the  right  of  reforming  the  Church  which  had 
been  assumed  by  the  imperial  diet,  from  the  advancement  of  politicjil  rights, 
and  from  the  ascendency  of  a  worldly  spirit.  According  to  this  system,  flie 
ecclesiastical  was  merely  an  element  of  the  civil  power.  This  legal  view  of 
the  subject  was  generally  adopted  about  the  commencement  of  the  eighteenth 
century,  in  consequence  of  the  liberal  use  which  Tkomasivs  made  of  it,  and 
the  judicious  limitations  assigned  to  it  by  Boehmer,  Still  the  consciousness 
of  her  own  rights  which  the  Church  possessed,  confirmed  by  the  records  of  a 
thousand  years,  soon  occasioned  a  theological  opposition  to  this  view.  Chan- 
cellor Pffijf  of  Tubingen  was  the  author  of  the  Collegial  System  (1719),  ac- 
cording to  which  the  Church  is  an  independent  corporation,  whose  power  can 
be  lawfully  assumed  by  princes  only  by  treaty  with  it.  Both  views  have 
contended  with  each  other  side  by  side,  and  have  alternately  exerted  an 
important  influence  upon  the  administration  of  the  Church,  (ft) 

§  418.     Legal  liel/ition*  to  the  Catholic  Church, 

Althoug]»  the  modern  state  was  inclined  to  compromise  the  religious  dif- 
ferences among  its  subjects,  both  Clmrches  tolerated  each  other  only  so  far 
as  they  could  not  invalidate  a  right  actually  acquired  during  the  recent  con- 
flicts. In  Germany^  this  hostility  was  fostered  especially  by  the  oppressions 
which  members  of  the  evangelical  Church  sustained  ft-om  their  Catholic 
rulers,  and  by  the  enticement  of  some  princes  to  the  Catholic  Church,  {a) 
Catholic  dynasties  were  established  in  the  Electoral  Palatinate  when  the 
Catholic  lino  of  the  Palatine  house  of  Neuberg  came  to  the  throne  (1685), 
and  in  Electoral  Saxony  when  Frederic  Augustus  became  convinced  of  the 
truth  of  the  Catholic  faith  on  his  becoming  a  candidate  for  the  Polish  crown 


a)  Schauroth  u.  Herrich^  Sftmml.  aller  Conclusorum  n.  Verhandl.  d.  Corpus  Evt.  Resenslx 
1751-86.  4  voK  f.    //  W.  r.  BQlow,  Gesch.  u.  VerC  d.  Carpus  Evv.  Regeosb.  1T95. 

h)  NeUrfUtladi,  do  trihas  Bystenistibns  doctr.  dc  JureMor.  dlrigendorom.  (Ob6&  Jnr.eec  lIsL  I7S8L) 
a)  Struve^  VxkA.  Be»chwcrden  zwisohon  den  Ksth.  u.  Evangellschen.  Lpa.  172i.  8  toIsw    Oeridt 
roUst  Cori>as  grsvamm.  ev.  Regensb.  177Iss.  5  vols,  t 


CHAP.  L    EVANO.  CHURCH  TILL  175a    §418.  CONVERTS.  493 

(1697).  The  oppression  of  the  Protestants  became  legalized  in  the  Palatinate, 
when  a  clause  in  the  Peace  of  Ryswick  (1697)  required  that  public  worship 
should  henceforth  he  conducted  in  the  same  manner  in  which  it  had  been 
performed  while  the  French  occupied  that  territory.  It  was  only  by  the 
reprisals  which  Prussia  made,  that  the  Reformed  Church  recovered  any  por- 
tion of  its  immunities,  (b)  In  Saxwuj^  all  the  privileges  of  the  Protestant 
Church  were  maintuined  by  the  zeal  of  the  people  and  the  states,  so  that  not 
even  a  verso  in  any  of  their  hij^hly  animated  hymns  would  they  sutfer  to  be 
stricken  out.  The  reigning  family  in  its  subsequent  generations  was  sincerely 
and  piously  attached  to  its  Church,  but  its  precarious  and  foreign  throne  was 
purchased  by  a  renunciation  of  its  important  position  in  Protestant  Germany, 
and  its  success  in  drawing  over  some  individuals  was  gained  at  the  expense 
of  the  alienation  of  a  loyal  people.  In  i?rM w«/?/ci*-Wolfenbfittel,  the  Princess 
EUzaheth  was  induced  to  forswear  her  vow  at  confirmation  (1707),  that  she 
might  become  the  mother  of  an  imperial  family,  and  her  grandfather  ^Ai^Aowy 
Ulrich^  whose  counsel  she  had  followed  in  this  matter,  embraced  the  same 
faith  with  a  policy  which  could  then  have  referred  to  no  consequences  except 
in  anotljer  world,  {c)  la  Wurtemhurg^  when  Charles  Alexander  went  over 
to  the  Catholic  Church,  the  courage  of  a  single  officer  was  sufficient  to  give 
a  check,  though  in  a  somewhat  tumultuous  manner,  to  the  progress  of  the 
defection  (1785).  (^Z)  In  Salzburg^  certain  peaceable  congregitions  which  had 
been  inclined  to  the  evangelical  Church,  and  had  been  tolerated  as  industri- 
ous subjects  ever  since  the  sixteenth  century,  fell  under  the  notice  of  the 
Archbishop  Count  Firmian^  who  undertook  their  conversion  by  violent  means 
(1729).  One  hundred  elders  then  assembled,  at  early  dawn  on  Sabbath 
morning,  in  a  lonely  cave  of  the  Schwarzach,  and  swore  on  the  sacred  host 
and  the  consecrated  salt  that  they  would  be  faithful  to  the  evangelical  faith 
and  the  triune  God,  and  that  in  every  misfortune  they  would  maintain  a  fra- 
ternal affection  for  each  other.  An  archiopiscopal  patent  of  emigration  (Oct. 
8l8t,  1731)  drove  them  under  the  severest  circumstances  from  their  houses 
and  their  estates.  Public  sympathy  was  enlisted  to  console  the  sad  train  of 
these  confessors  for  the  loss  of  their  beautiful  mountain  homos,  and  twenty 
thousand  of  them  fonnd  a  hospitable  reception  in  Prussia.  (/)  In  Hungary^ 
few  magnates  long  resisted  the  temptations  to  apostasy  presented  to  them,  in 
the  form  of  bishops*  sees  and  offices  in  Church  and  State.  The  Protestants 
of  that  country,  although  protected  by  the  laws,  were  robbed  by  those  who 
professed  to  administer  those  laws,  not  only  of  their  churches,  but  even  of 


h)  J.  J.  Jfo4er,  Bericht  v.  d.  clausula  A-  IV.  Pacls  Rysu.  Frkt  1782.  4.  PaUer,  syst  DareL  d, 
tyf&k.  ReL  Bonchwerden.  Quit  179S. 

c)  Codex  August  Th.  L  p.  846s.  Acta  hist  ecc,  vol.  I.  p.  1  ISss.  Wef«8ii,  neues  Mns.  C  s&cha. 
Oesch.  vol.  I.  P.  2.  F.  Forster,  Ft.  Aup.  II.  I'otsd.  lSS9.—Auff,  Th^iner,  QcBch.  d,  Zuruckk- d. 
rwf.  Ilans^r  v.  Brannschw.  u.  8ach»en  In  d.  Schooss  d.  kath.  K.  Einsied.  1848.  To  bo  corrected  by: 
W.  O.  Soldaru,  droisslg  Jahro  dee  Pro!«elytism.  in  Sachs,  u.  Br.  Lps.  1S45.  W.  IToeck^  A.  Ulrich  u. 
EUa.  ▼.  Br.  Wolfenb.  1845. 

d)  J.v.  MoMr,  Lcbens-Qesch.  8  ed.  Frkf.  xl  Lpe.  1777.  yoL  L  p.  184fl8. 

<•)  ScMhorn^  de  rel.  er.  In  prov.  Sall^b.  ortu  et  fatia.  LpSw  1782.  4.  M.  Zua  t.  StUbiMr^  L. 
1782.  J.  Mas^r,  actenm.  Ber.  v.  d.  w?hwercn  Vert  d.  Evv.  in  S.  ErL  1782.  12  8t  G&king,  Emlgra- 
tloDsgesch.  FrkC  n.  L.  (1782  )  1787.  2  voU  4.— £1  Pantf,  Qescb.  d.  Anaw.  d.  ev.  8.  Lpa.  1827.  Zeit- 
echr.  t  hist  Tb.  1S82.  vol.  IL  P.  2. 


494  MODERN  (  IIURCU  HISTORY.    PER.  YL    A.  D.  1648-1858. 

their  children.  Once  more  at  the  Diet  of  Oedenbarg  (1681)  their  religions 
freedom  was  solemnly  acknowledged,  but  with  a  reservation  in  favor  of  the  right 
of  the  proprietors  of  the  soil.  In  order  to  break  down  the  national  aristocra- 
cy, whose  exorbitant  privileges  were  principally  maintained  by  the  Protestant 
nobility,  a  murderous  tribunal  was  instituted  at  Eperies  (1687),  and  the 
Jesuits,  by  their  crafty  policy  for  conversion,  destroyed  the  soul  together 
with  the  body.  By  the  exclusion  of  its  complaints  from  the  general  diet,  the 
evangelical  Church  was  completely  abandoned  (1715),  and  reduced  to  less 
than  one  half  its  former  size  by  a  process  of  bloodless  martyrdoms.  In  the 
other  patrimonial  countries  of  Austria  the  evangelical  mode  of  worship  was 
utterly  annihilated.  The  few  who  remained  secretly  faithful  to  their  reli- 
gion, and  endeavored  to  transmit  it  to  those  who  should  come  after  them,  as 
soon  as  they  were  detected,  were  banished  to  Transylvania,  the  only  asylum 
now  loft  for  evangelical  Christians  and  exiles.  (/)  In  Poland^  the  Dissi- 
dents, gradually  abandoned  by  the  aristocracy,  gradually  lost  also  their  eccle- 
siastical and  civil  rights.  In  1717,  a  law  was  enacted  which  forbade  them  to 
build  any  new  churches,  and  another  passed  in  1788  excluded  them  from  the 
general  diet  and  from  all  civil  offices.  The  superior  clergy,  under  the  direc- 
tion of  the  Jesuits,  now  went  so  far  as  to  think  of  their  complete  extermina- 
tion. The  power  of  the  Jesuits  was  exhibited  in  the  terrible  vengeance  they 
inflicted  (1724)  upon  tlie  Protestant  city  of  Thom^  when  the  general  hatred 
broke  out  in  a  popular  insurrection  against  the  Jesuit  college  in  that  place. 
Despairing  of  all  other  relief,  the  Dissidents  threw  themselves  under  Russian 
protection  (1767),  from  which  they  obtained  a  restoration  of  their  rights. 
They  were,  however,  so  persecuted  on  account  of  this  proceeding,  that  they 
never  found  peace  until  they  obtained  it  under  the  favor  of  a  foreign  mle  at 
the  dissolution  of  the  Polish  kingdom  (after  1772).  (^)  As  soon  as  Louit 
XIV.  began  to  reign  independently  in  France  (1661),  tlie  work  of  restoring 
unity  of  faith  was  commenced.  The  lluguenots  were  deprived  of  many 
churches  and  schools  under  the  pretence  of  reviving  the  privileges  granted 
by  the  edict  of  Nantes.  In  a  fit  of  repentance  for  his  excesses,  the  king 
allowed  himself  to  be  persuaded  to  atone  for  them  by  purifying  his  kingdom 
from  all  heretics.  Many  conversions  among  the  nobility  to  obtain  the  favor 
of  the  court,  and  among  the  people  for  trifling  sums  of  money,  seemed  to 
promise  an  easy  accomplishment  of  this  undertaking.  Children  were  taken 
from  their  parents,  ^^  booted  missions  "  of  dragoons  were  sent  in  every  direc- 
tion (after  1681),  and  the  whole  mighty  power  of  the  monarchy  was  enlisted 
in  the  work  of  conversion.  In  spite  of  the  terrible  penalties  denoimoed 
against  all  emigration,  the  evangelical  classes,  wherever  it  was  possible,  fled 
to  other  lands.  A  home  was  offered  to  the  fugitives  in  every  part  of  Pro- 
testant Europe,  but  especially  in  Holland  and  Brandenburg.     France  lost 


/)  S  857.  Acta  htst  occ  voL  XVIL  p.  828.  47«s«.  Waloh.  net  R.  Gesch.  toL  IV.  |i  S27.  YL  Ml 
IX,  1s8.  OeHch.  d.  Prot  in  Ung.  (Archlv.  t  KO.  vol.  L  8t  8.)  Die  Schliichtbank  t.  Eperieo.  (/  t> 
Ilurmayr,  Tosclicnb.  C  vftterl  Gesch.  LpA.  1837.)  [A  Hist  of  the  Prot  Charch  in  Hang,  to  1850^ 
« ith  reference  also  to  Transylvania,  with  Preface  by  D'Aablgn^,  tnaaL  by  J.  Craig;  was  pobL  ia 
Lund.  1854.  8.] 

ff)  S  84)0.  {JahUnUky)  Das  betrubte  Thorn.  BrL  1785.  LiUenthal^  8  Aetna  t.  Tboni.  Tntja^ 
Kunigsb.  1725.     Walch,  m^t  B.  Gescb.  vol  IV.  p.  L  VII,  8ts. 


CHAP.  L    EVANG.  CHURCH  TILL  176a    1 4ia  LOUIS  XIT.    CEVENNEa        495 

more  than  half  a  million  of  its  most  indnstrions  and  trusty  citizens.  The 
edict  of  Nantes  had  long  been  disregarded,  but  it  was  at  last  formally  re- 
voked in  the  year  1685.  In  the  Cevennes  alone,  a  mountain  tribe  which  had 
descended  from  the  Waldenses,  and  had  been  excited  to  enthusiasm  by  a  series 
of  abases,  took  up  arms  against  their  king.  A  young  artisan  at  the  head  of 
his  Oamisards  exposed  his  naked  bosom  to  the  swords  of  the  marshals  of 
France.  Prophetic  visions  produced  by  an  epidemic  disease  of  the  imagina- 
tion and  the  boldest  military  exploits,  were  witnessed  in  the  same  persons. 
But  as  many  of  these  prophets  and  heroes  as  escaped  the  slaughter  of  the 
battle-field  and  the  axe  of  the  executioner,  wore  allowed  only  the  privilege, 
which  many  of  them  scorned,  of  freely  going  into  exile  (1704).  The  former 
were  known  in  England  under  the  appellation  of  the  Little  Prophets,  pro- 
claimed the  approach  of  the  age  of  the  Holy  Spirit,  the  subversion  of  the 
pope  and  of  the  Turks,  and  created  much  astonishment  among  the  people,  until 
with  honest  confidence  they  tested  their  pretensions  by  an  attempt  to  raise 
the  dead.  Two  millions  of  the  Reformed  still  remained  in  France,  bereft  of 
all  civil  rights,  and  with  no  congregations  except  in  the  wilderness.  The  ter- 
rible laws  of  1724  could  not  be  carried  into  effect  upon  a  whole  population, 
but  examples  were  made  of  individuals,  and  many  pious  preachers  were 
hung.  But  Protestantism  heroically  re-collected  its  ener^es,  and  again  held 
its  first  national  synod  in  1744.  (h)  In  Switzerland y  a  civil  war  was  the  con- 
sequence of  the  protection  which  Zurich  extended  to  a  few  converts  in 
8chweitz.  The  evangelical  party  was  beaten  near  Vilmergen  (1656),  but 
without  producing  any  permanent  change  in  the  strengtli  of  either  party. 
Once  again  the  old  grudge  broke  forth  on  account  of  the  oppression  of  the 
Reformed  inhabitants  of  Toggenbnrg  by  the  Abbot  of  St.  Gall,  and  an  un- 
seasonable religious  war  grew  out  of  an  insignificant  brawl  respecting  a 
cburch.  A  second  bloody  battle  at  Vilmergen  (1712)  was  decisive  against 
the  Catholics,  religious  liberty  was  proclaimed  in  Toggenbnrg,  and  the  super- 
fluous wealth  of  the  abbot  was  shared  between  Zurich  and  Berne,  (i) 

§  414.     Attempts  at  Union. 

K.  W.  Iferingy  (p.  46S.)  Unioiuverauche  8.  d.  Re£  y.  Q.  £.  O.  (Deatsche  Viorteljabrschr.  Stattg. 
1&I&  N.  8188.)    C  O.  NeudeckfT,  d.  Uauptvere.  z.  Paciflo.  d.  ov.  K.  in  Deatsch).  1S46. 

Some  attempts  at  union  were  now  made  which  proceeded  sometimes  from 
the  action  of  individuals  and  sometimes  rather  from  circumstances.  The 
ultimate  object  of  these,  generally,  was  to  effect  a  reconciliation  between  the 
Protestant  and  the  Catholic  Churches,  but  the  only  result  was  to  show  how 

K)  %  86ft.  Soulier^  H.  dn  Calvfni.<«nie,  sa  nalssance,  son  progi^  sa  ddcadonce  ct  sa  fln  en  France. 
Par.  1080.  4.^/ittlhieres^  ^claircisMmentfl  blst  eur  lea  causes  de  la  ruvocat  do  Tedit  de  N.  Par. 
1782.  8  ToK  Ancillan,  II.  do  r6tabli'wenient  de  Francois  rcfugi6e  dans  les  utats  do  Brandonb.  Ber. 
1190. — De  la  Baume,  H.  des  rev.  des  Cevcnnos.  Par.  1709.  Brueytt^  II.  da  fanatlcisine  on  des  Co  v. 
Par.  1718.  2  vols.  12.  J.  C.  K.  ITo/nian,  Gesch.  d.  Aufruhrs  In  d.  Scv.  NOrdl.  1S87.  CoinpL  Wnlch, 
BIbL  Tol.  II.  p.  1068a.~CA.  Coquerely  H.  des  ^glises  da  desert  depuis  la  fln  da  T^fuxQ  de  Louis  XIV. 
joaqa'k  U  pjv.  Par.  1S41.  2  volow  [(7A.  FW««,  O.  (U  Felice  (p.  426).  £«Unb.  Review,  April, 
18M.  in  Eclectic  Mag.  Aug.  18M.  p.  4348a.  Memoirs  of  the  Wars  of  the  Cevennes,  prolbssedly  b/ 
Cavnllier  bimaeir,  and  transl.  into  Engl.  Dublin.  1826.] 

t)  IMttnger^  HelT.  KGoscb.  vol  IV.  J.  v.  JfueUsr't  Scbw.  Oeecb.  fortges.  ▼.  VuilUmin,  ZQr. 
18401  ToL  X.  p.  48288. 


496  MODERN  CHUBCU  HISTOBY.    FEB.  TL    A.  D.  1618-18981 

profound  was  the  gulf  botween  these  bodies.  A  more  immediate  and  practf- 
cable  object  was  to  unite  by  more  intimate  bonds  of  association  the  Lutheran 
and  the  Reformed  Churches.  The  feelings  of  the  Komish  party  were  princi- 
pally enlisted  in  the  recovery  of  those  who  had  departed  from  them,  and 
who  on  their  professed  return  to  their  Mother  Church  were  often  obliged  to 
anathematize  the  objects  of  their  former  veneration,  (a)  while  those  of  the 
Protestants  were  directed  to  the  attainment  of  national  unity.  Spinola^ 
Bishop  of  Tina,  with  a  commission  from  both  the  emperor  and  the  pope, 
visited  (after  1G75)  many  of  the  Protestant  courts  of  Germany  that  he  might 
lay  before  them  certain  ambiguous  proposals  of  accommodation,  (b)  The 
only  country  in  which  any  hope  of  success  seemed  to  present  itself  was  Ilan- 
over,  where  the  reigning  family  was  anxious  to  live  on  terms  of  closer  inti- 
macy with  the  emperor.  Leibnitz  also,  that  he  might  give  peace  to  the 
world  and  advance  the  cause  of  science,  availed  himself  of  some  plans  which 
had  been  handed  down  by  tradition  from  Calixtus,  and  entered  into  some 
negotiations  with  Bossuet.  Tlie  latter  was  willing  to  concede  the  marriage 
of  the  clergy,  the  cup  in  the  sacrament,  and  the  mass  in  the  common  lan- 
guage of  the  people,  while  the  former  thought  the  Catholic  form  of  govern- 
ment might  be  received  as  a  human  institution,  and  by  the  play  of  his  fancy 
wrought  liimself  into  a  belief  of  the  Catholic  dogmas,  {e)  He  however  was 
anxious  that  the  question  of  the  reception  of  the  decrees  of  the  Synod  of 
Trent  should  remain  open  until  the  decision  of  a  general  coancil,  in  which 
Protestants  might  have  a  seat,  and  their  votes  might  be  given  respecting  it. 
As  Bossuet  was  of  course  obliged  to  adhere  to  these  decrees,  and  the  pros- 
pect of  a  succession  to  the  British  throne  was  opened  to  the  bouse  of  Han- 
over, all  hopes  of  success  iu  such  negotiations  were  necessarily  frustrated,  (tl) 
John  Fabricius^  who  had  token  upon  his  conscience  the  responsibility  for  the 
action  of  the  Princess  Elizabeth  in  going  over  to  the  Catholic  {e)  Church, 
was  so  overwhelmed  by  the  contempt  of  the  Protestant  world,  that  he  was 
obliged  to  resign  his  professorship  in  the  University  of  Helmstadt  (1709).  It 
was  not  long,  however,  before  ho  was  abundantly  compensated  for  this  latter 
step.  For  nearly  half  a  century,  John  Dnraem  (d.  1680),  an  Anglican  cler- 
gyman and  an  apostle  of  Protestant  union,  travelled  about  for  the  accom- 
plishment of  his  great  object.  But  each  of  the  three  great  Protestant 
Churches  contended  not  only  for  a  faith  in  the  Christ  revealed  in  the  Scrip- 
tures, which  was  the  only  basis  of  union  insisted  upon  by  him,  but  for  all 
those  peculiarities  which  separated  it  from  the  others.  An  agreement  for 
mutual  ecclesiastical  recognition  (tolerantia  ecclesiastica)  was  formed  on  the 
principles  of  Calixtus  at  the  religious  conference  at  Casscl  (1661),  and  re- 

d)  Mohnlk^^  z.  Oescb.  <L  ungar.  Fluchformul.  Qreiftwr.  1S28.    Zeltsch.  t  blst  Th.  1842.  H.  1. 
h)  That  wbicli  was  in&do  public:  Concordia  cbristiana.  Vion.  16S1. 

c)  Oouvres  posthumes  dc  M.  Bus«aet.  Amst  1753.  4  1  vol— Systeraa  thcol.  LeibnltztL  Fw.  ISlft. 
mit  Ucbrs.  v.  Rd«»  u.  Weimt,  Mninr.  1S20.  8  ed.  1825.  comp.  G.  E.  Schnltf,  Q.  <L  EntddassL 
KAthollk*gewe»cn.  Outt  1827.  PerU,  u.  L.  kircbl.  QL  B«keDntn.  BrL  184&  [J/adHe,  LUb  oTL 
P.20SSS.] 

d)  0.  G.  &'.hmi(U^  pericnla  coi^ungendarum  Eoo.  a  Leibn.  fhcta  e.  similibos  noatrM  aeUtis  moll- 
miDibn»  cotnitarata.  Orim.  1844. 

e)  ErOrtorto  Frage  Hn.  Fabricii,  dasa  zwischcn  der  Augsb.  Oonfl  u.  rOmiacbkath.  BoL  ktia  foo- 
derL  Uotcntcbied  sei.  170^ 


CHAP.  L    SYANO.  GHUBGH  TILL  17M.    §414  UNION.    LEIBNITZ.  497 

suited  in  the  transfer  of  the  UniTersitj  of  Rintelen  to  the  Reformed  Church. 
The  members  of  that  Church  were  always  inclined  to  recognize  others  as 
brethren,  but  the  Lntheran  divines  would  rather  hold  communion  with  the 
papists,  and  regarded  the  hope  that  even  Calvinists  might  be  saved  as  a  temp* 
tation  of  the  devil.  (/)  Frequently  also,  though  not  without  remonstrance, 
individuals  of  the  Keformed  Church  participated  in  the  sacred  Supper  in  the 
Lutheran  churches,  (g)  After  the  Peace  of  Ryswick,  the  urgent  importance 
of  fraternal  connections  between  the  Protestant  nations  as  a  security  against 
the  dangerous  exaltation  of  the  Catholic  powers,  became  still  more  apparent, 
and  upon  the  princes  of  the  house  of  Prussia  was  especially  devolved  the 
task  of  adjusting  the  dissensions  which  prevailed  principally  among  the  Lu- 
therans, by  a  union  of  the  two  Protestant  Churches.  But  as  long  as  the 
energies  of  Lutheranism  continued  unabated,  every  attempt  at  reconcihation 
only  seemed  to  widen  the  breach  between  them.  (A)  The  appointment  of  a 
few  bishops  constituted  a  port  of  the  ceremonial  at  the  coronation  of  the 
first  king  of  Prussia  (1700),  but  this  suggested  the  idea  of  a  union  by  the 
introduction  of  the  form  of  government  which  prevailed  in  the  Anglican 
Church,  (i)  Temples  of  peace  and  union  churches  were  however  consecrated 
in  vain ;  but  although  Leibnitz  broke  off  the  negotiations,  it  was  in  the  full 
confidence  that  the  object  would  one  day  be  brought  of  itself  to  a  succeflsful 
conclusion. 

§  416.     The  Engluh  Retolution.     Cont,  from  §  864. 

K  nyd€  of  Clarendon^  H.  of  the  Rebellion  in  Engl.  1649-66.  Oxf.  1667.  8  vols.  f.    Bwntt,  H.  of 

hfiown  times,  1660-1718w  Lond.  1724.  3  vols.  4.  and  often.    [Becret  H.  of  Charles  II.  Lond.  17S2.  8 

Toia.    Clarke^  Life  of  James  IL  Lond.  1S16.  2  vols.]    CK  F.  Wurm,  d.  Engl.  K.  1689-1702.  Umk 

ISM.    F.  C.  IhiMmann,  Ocsch.  d.  en^l.  Rev.  Lpa.  1843.  6  ed.  185a    [II.  of  the  EngL  Rev.,  from  the 

German  uf  Dabloumn  hy  E.  Uoyd^  Lond.  1344  ]    T.  B,  MacatUay^  Tlist  of  Engl,  from  the  accession 

of  James  II.  Lond.  1S48-0&  4  vols.    [J.  McTntosh,  H.  of  the  Rev.  in  Engl  Lond.  1S84  4.  A.  Hi  Tre- 

vor^  Life  and  Times  of  William  III.  of  Engl.  Lond.  1885-6.  2  volai  8.    P.  Orimblot,  Letters  of 

William  III.,  Lonis  XIV.  and  their  Ministers,  &c  Lond.  1847.  8.    J.  Vernon,  Court  and  Times  of 

WQIiam  III.  in  Letters  to  the  Duke  of  Shrewsbury,  ed.  by  G.  P.  R.  JamM,  Lond.  1841.  8  vols.  8. 

A.  Curret^  IL  of  the  Counter-Rev.  for  the  Re-estab.  of  Popery  under  Charles  IL  and  James  IL,  and 

C  /.  F^  IL  of  James  IL  (in  Rogue's  Eur.  Lib.)  Lond.  1846.  8.] 

On  the  death  of  Cromwell,  the  English  people,  weary  of  the  tyranny  of 
a  theocratic  republic,  recalled  the  Stuarts  to  the  throne  (1G60).     Charles  11^ 
(hough  he  wavered  between  infidelity  and  Gatholicism,  followed  in  the  foot- 
steps of  his  father,  and  the  mtyesty  of  the  kingdom  trembled  nnder  the  i^ju- 
inflicted  by  a  dissolute  despotism.    The  Episcopal  Established  Church 
restored,  and  the  Puritans  had  to  bear  the  blame  for  the  blood  shed  dur- 
the  revolution.    Bishops  were  forced  even  upon  the  Scottish  Church, 
if  any  royal  favor  was  shown  to  the  dissenters,  it  was  only  from  a  regard 


TWtfcJt,  Oelst  d.  Inth.  Th.  Witt  p.  116. 169.  21L 
0)  JMd.  p.  122m.  and  Deutsche  Zeitsch.  t  chr.  Wlss.  1852.  N.  Sx 

^)  Erlnnerangen  an  d.  Kurfl  v.  Brandenb.  n.  KOnigo  v.  Preussen  hin&  ibres  Verhaltens  in  Ange- 
^*^  <1  Bel.  u.  K.  Hamb.  1888.    £.  Ileltcinff,  iL  F.  W.  des  grossen  EurC  reL  Ansichten  n.  ViroW 
Po*lUk.  Lemgo.  1847. 

^  Belatlon  des  mesares,  qui  fureni  prises  dans  les  annces  1711-18  poor  introduire  la  Iltarglo 
^^W.  dans  leR.de  Prosse  et  dans  TElect.  de  IlannoTTe.  Extrait  d'on  mannsc.  d.  Dr.  Sharp,  Lond. 
17^.  4.   ffgnke^  Maff.  1796s.  vol.  IV.  p.  168s&  V.  p.  21988.    Darlegnng  der  im  yor.  Jahrh.  wegen  Sin- 
^^^-  d.  angl.  KVerC  in  Pr.  gepflognen  Unterhandl.  Lps.  1842. 

82 


498  MODERN  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  VI.    A.  D.  1M8-I85a 

to  the  Catholics.  Tlie  Teftt  Act  was  therefore  passed  in  Parliament  (1678), 
by  which  every  one  was  prohibited  from  holding  any  pnblic  office  unless  he 
had  acknowledged  the  king's  ecclesiastical  supremacy,  and  had  received  the 
sacrament  of  the  Lord's  Supper  in  an  Episcopal  church.  Leigh  ton  (d.  16d4), 
who  had  always  kept  the  gospel  free  from  any  connection  with  politics,  re* 
signed  the  archbishopric  of  Glasgow  as  soon  as  the  violent  measures  of  the 
Episcopal  Church  had  cut  off  all  hope  of  its  reconciliation  with  the  Presby- 
terians, (a)  Milton,  having  published  a  treatise  in  which  he  endeavored  to 
justify  the  sentence  of  death  which  had  been  passed  upon  the  king,  gave  in 
his  darkness  and  solitude  a  bright  picture  of  his  severe  puritanic  Cliristian- 
ity  in  his  poem  of  Paradise  Lost,  (h)  James  IL  (after  1685)  publicly  pro- 
fessed his  adherence  to  the  Catholic  Church,  received  a  Roman  nuncio  at  his 
court,  proclaimed  free  toleration  of  all  religions,  imprisoned  those  bishops 
who  protested  against  it,  called  around  him  a  retinue  of  Catholic  officers,  and 
formed  the  design  of  governing  a  disaffected  peoj)le  without  the  aid  of  Par- 
liament. That  people,  however,  soon  forsook  him.  Uis  son-in-law  William 
III.  of  Orange,  the  groat  champion  of  the  Republic  and  of  Protestantism, 
became  king  by  an  agreement  in  which  the  constitution  of  the  empire  and 
of  the  Church  was  distinctly  settled  (1689).  England  retained  the  Episcopal 
form  of  government  for  its  established  Chnrch,  Ireland  was  placed  under  the 
jurisdiction  of  the  Church  of  England,  and  most  of  the  dissenters  obtained 
the  privilege  of  public  worship.  Socinians  and  Catholics,  however,  were 
excepted,  and  were  never  placed  on  a  level  with  otJier  dissenters  until  1779. 
The  Test  Act  also  remained  in  fall  force.  In  Scotland,  where  the  inclina- 
tions of  the  people  were  in  favor  of  it,  a  Presbyterian  form  of  government 
was  maintained.  The  supreme  ecclesiastical  authority  is  vested  in  a  General 
Assembly,  composed  of  commissioners  from  the  fifteen  provincial  Presby- 
teries, assembled  annually  at  Edinburgh. 

§  416.    Freethinkers  or  Deiftts, 

J.  T^liind,  view  of  the  Trlnclpal  Pelstlcal  Writer?.  1754.  2  vols.     Triniu»  Fr^ydenker-LexlcoD. 
L.  u.  Brnb.  1709.  Zucabe,  17C\     C.  Thornchtnid,  Vers.  c.  vollst  cnjrL  Fn^yd.  Bibl.  Hal.  176a«.  4 
vols.     G.  L/>SM^  ncuste  Gcsch.  d.  Ungl.  {WaU'h,  nst  llel.  Gc.*<'h.  vol.  II.  p,  8s.5.  Ill,  875m.)    S'A/AMer, 
Ge.«»ch.  d.  18.  Jahrh.  vol.  I.  p.  S82«.     G.  V.  UvhUr^  Gcuch.  d.  ensrl.  Delsmus.  Statt^.  1S41.    [Acnm*^ 
Die  Freidenker  in  Engl.  Lps.  1S54.  12.    Hagenhach^  KGcsch.  des  la  u.  19.  Jhh.  Vories.  la  vol 
Lija.  Ii48.] 

It  was  in  England  that  we  discover  the  first  efforts  of  the  mind  to  b; 
away  from  all  traditionary  theology.    The  struggle  between  the  two  Cliorclw 
there  was  severe,  and  the  established  clergy  did  not  hesitate  to  defend  th 
Catholic  position  directly  in  the  face  of  their  Protestant  faith.    But  the  c^  ^ 
freedom  there  enjoyed  gave  to  every  one  full  opportunity,  not  indeed  wxtA- 

a)  Rob.  Lolghton  e.  apost.  Mann  In  stQnn  Zelt  Bri.  1S«5.  [J^rment^  Life  and  Remains  of  L 
Lond.  J.  Pearson^  Life  prefixed  to  Works.  Lond.  1846.  Works  with  a  Memoir,  by  Aitman^  E/dioh 
1840.  8vo.] 

b)  Defenjilo  pro  popnlo  Angllcano.  Lond.  1661.  Paradise  Lost  166T.  De  Doctr.  chr.  L  IL  ed  T. 
R.  8umn^,  Lpa  1S27.— TT.  IlayUy.  Life  of  Milton.  Ixjnd.  1796.  4.  O.  Weber,  in  Banmer's  bbt. 
Taschenb.  1S52.  [TodcTa  Life  of  Milton.  Lond.  S.  J.  Jvimey,  Life  and  Timeflof  J.  Miltoo.  Titu 
York.  183a  12.] 


CHAP.  L    EVANG.  CHUECU  TILL  175a    §  416.  FREETHINKEBS.  499 

out  some  danger,  (a)  to  express  opinions  adverse  to  the  established  faith,  A 
series  of  authors  with  no  official  connection  with  the  ecclesiastical  establish- 
ment, bnt  within  the  pale  of  the  Church  itself,  defended  by  arguments  from 
common  sense,  and  in  some  instances  with  considerable  learning,  the  position 
that  the  natural  consciousness  of  the  divine  existence  and  man's  own  con- 
science was  all  that  was  necessary  for  a  perfect  religion.  Christianity  was 
therefore  regarded  by  some  of  these  writers  as  of  no  value  except  as  it  con- 
tained the  germ  of  this  natural  religion ;  by  others  it  was  resisted  as  priest- 
craft; and  by  all  its  historical  importance  and  origin  was  denied.  Lord 
Herbert  of  Cherhury  (d.  1648),  a  statesman  of  considerable  seriousness  and 
enthusiasm  with  respect  to  religion,  was  the  first  to  develope  this  idea  of  a 
natural  religion,  which  he  of  course  pointed  out  as  an  element  in  pagan- 
ism. (&)  Ilobhes  (d.  1679),  one  of  those  vigorous  thinkers  who  deny  their 
intellects  and  sell  them  to  arbitrary  power,  endeavored  to  prove  that  Chris- 
tianity was  an  oriental  phantom,  which  had  been  raised  by  the  influence  of 
Grecian  philosophy  to  be  an  instrument  of  absolute  monarchy,  (c)  The  Earl 
of  Shaftesbury  (1713),  advocating  a  religion  of  mere  morality,  mingled  in 
bis  writings  an  apparent  reverence  for  Christianity  with  the  most  delicate 
irony,  (d)  Toland  (d.  1722)  made  an  assault  upon  the  Jewish  character  of 
Christianity  and  the  genuineness  of  its  original  records,  and  endeavored  to 
establish  a  pantheistic  relij^on  of  a  purely  earthly  nature,  (e)  The  peculiar 
▼ay  in  which  Mandetille  (d.  1783)  represented  the  passions  and  vices  of  men 
tt  necessary  to  the  prosperity  of  the  state,  made  his  work  a  satire  upon  the 
morality  and  tlie  perfect  standard  advocated  by  the  Church.  (/)  Collins 
(d.  1729)  attacked  the  views  of  miracles,  and  the  whole  system  of  sensuous 
metaphysics  in  vogue  among  the  divines  of  that  period,  {g)  Woohton  resolved 
the  miracles  of  Jesus  into  a  series  of  allegories,  and  died  in  defence  of  his 
opinions  in  prison  (1733).  Qi)  Tiudal  (d.  1783)  contended  that  the  Scriptures 
irere  nothing  but  original  documents  of  natural  religion,  that  Christianity 
iras  as  old  as  creation,  and  that  the  Church  was  an  institution  of  the 

a)  Blanco  White,  Law  of  antl-relijrioas  llhol.  Dnbl.  1S34. 

h)  De  verltate  proiit  dbtinguitur  a  Ilevol.  (Par.  1621.  4.)  Lond.  1683.  4.  and  often.  Dc  Kel.  Gen- 
tlllam.  IM5.  ed. ./.  TWh.  Anist  1700.  [tran«l.  Into  Engl.  Lond.  17(«.  8.  Life  of  Lonl  II.  of  C.  writ- 
ten by  hlmwlf.  Iy>nd.  1S24.  8.] 

c)  Lerlathan.  Lond.  1651.  C  (in  Lat  de  motoria,  forma  ct  potestate  civitatis  ero,  ot  civil.')  Ain«!t 
ICTO.  4  and  often.  Hist  ecc  carmine  elear.  cominnata.  Aug.  TrlnobanL  1688.  [Eng.  Works,  ed.  by 
Wiw.  MiiUmcorth^  Lond.  1^89-48.  9  vols.  6.  Latin  woiks,  t«l.  by  R.  BlacJtbourne,  Lond.  1S;W.  8.]— 
7*Aoma<'  //'>W'.  Vita  Carolop.  16S1.  12. 

<f)  Characteristic^  of  Men,  Manners,  and  Times.  Ix)nd.  1783.  8  vola.  12.  [Cooke^  Life  of  Stiaftes- 
bo»y.  Ix)n(J.  1S36.  2  vols.  8.] 

e)  Cliri>tlanlty  not  my*terIou!«.  Ix>nd.  1C06.  Adeisidaomon  ».  T.  Livliu  a  t^uiien^t  vin.lIoAtus. 
Wag.  Com.  17f:9.  Naza^enu^  Jewish,  Gentile,  and  Mahometan  Chnstianity.  Lond.  1718.  rantlu'la- 
Uoon-  Co!»mopL  1720.  [TolancTii  MIscell.  Works,  with  Account  of  Life  and  Writings  by  Det  J/ai- 
■vvctKr,  Lond.  1747.  2  vol?.  S.]—Mo9hfim,  Vindiciae  antiq.  chr.  discipL  adv.  ToL  ed.  2.  limb.  1722.  4. 
ITheol.  and  Pliilol<  g.  Works  of  Toland.  1782.  8.] 

y)  Fable  of  the  Bees.  Lond.  1706.  2  volsw  12.  with  comm.  Lond.  1714.    [Free  Thoughts  on  Kol. 
^h«  Ctiunh,  dec.  Lond  1729   12] 

g)  A  dtocourw  of  Froethinking.  Lond.  1718.  Tlie  scheme  of  literal  prophecy  considered!.  Lond. 
^"•Se.  2  vols.  [HisL  and  Crit  Eivay  on  the  89  Artt  Ac  Lond.  1724  8.  Grounds  and  reasons  of  the 
^r.  ReL  Lond.  1724  B.]—Thorechmtd,  Lebensgesch.  C.  Drsd,  17M. 

A)  Disc  on  tlie  Miracl&s  Lond.  1727.  with  5  oontinuations  till  1729.  Curll^  Life  of  W.  Lond. 
11^    LemJt^,  Nacbr.  v.  W.  Bchickiw  Lpa.  1740. 


500         MODERN  GHUBCH  HISTOBY.  PER  YL  A.  D.  lU&-180a. 

state,  (i)  Morgan  (d.  1743),  who  under  the  influence  of  motives  partaking 
very  little  of  a  spiritoal  character,  had  wandered  through  every  variety  of 
the  most  heterogeneous  parties  in  the  Church,  attempted  finally  to  tear  off 
the  mask  from  every  thing  historical  in  Christianity,  and  show  that  it  was  an 
invention  of  priests.  {Jc)  Chubb  (1747)  maintained  that  Christianity  was 
originally  intended  to  he  a  revelation  of  the  moral  law  of  nature,  the  viola- 
tion of  which  was  to  he  atoned  for  by  repentance  or  punished  at  the  final 
judgment,  hut  that  it  had  been  misunderstood  and  misrepresented  by  the 
apostles.  (/)  Lord  BoUnghrolce  (d.  1751),  a  man  possessed  of  the  most  emi- 
nent social  qualities,  pointed  out  to  those  who  made  a  gain  of  religion,  that 
the  same  worldly  policy  which  then  directed  the  events  of  history  had  done 
the  same  in  all  past  ages,  (m)  The  partial  views  which  this  author  took  from 
his  peculiar  position,  were  expressed  in  a  ridiculous  representation  of  the  his- 
tory of  the  English  kings,  written  in  what  he  conceived  to  be  the  peculiar 
views  and  manner  of  the  Jewish  chronicles,  (n)  Henry  Dodtcell^  without 
attempting  any  compromise  with  science,  endeavored  to  prove  that  by  its 
very  nature,  religious  faith  excluded  the  exercise  of  all  thought,  (p)  The  nu- 
merous treatises  written  by  the  clergy  in  opposition  to  the  Deists,  called  also 
Eationalists,  exhibited  a  much  higher  degree  of  learning,  (p)  but  as  literary 
productions,  they  were  no  match  for  the  better  class  of  the  works  <^  their 
opponents.  Concessions  were  made  in  them  which  rendered  others  abao- 
lutely  necessary,  and  suggested  doubts  in  circles  to  which  professed  oppo- 
nents could  gain  no  access.  Many  apostasies  from  the  Church  under  the 
guise  of  indifference  took  place  among  the  higher  ranks.  The  noblest  repre- 
sentative of  this  class  was  David  Httme  (d.  1776),  a  pleasant  philosopher,  who 
in  the  uncertainty  at  which  he  had  arrived  respecting  all  human  aflSura,  con- 
cluded it  best  to  be  independent  in  all  things,  (q)  Even  after  the  most 
flourishing  period  of  Deism  had  passed,  the  absurd  scheme  of  an  association 
of  deists  and  atheists,  or  the  mockery  of  a  hell-fire  dub,  was  commenced  in 
London  (about  1780).  (r)  The  great  body  of  the  people  held  firmly  to  the 
ancient  Christianity,  in  behalf  of  which  a  new  enthusiasm  was  awakened 
among  the  sects.  In  Germany^  some  isolated  persons  still  went  forth  in  pur- 
suit of  adventures  against  the  Church.    Matthias  Knutzen^  an  itinerant  can- 


i)  BightB  of  the  Chorch  ag^nst  Botnlsh  and  alt  other  prieeta  Lond.  1T07.  and  often.  Chrittlantty 
as  old  as  the  Creation.  Lond.  1780.  4.  and  often.  [Mem.  of  the  Life,  WrltingSi  and  ControTenka  of 
Tlndal.  Lond.  1788.  8.  and  often.] 

k)  The  moral  philoeophor.  Lond.  1787.  8  vols.    Besurreotion  of  Jesna.  Lond.  1748L 

t)  The  true  Gospel  of  J.  Chr.  asserted.  Lond.  178S.  and  othersL 

m)  Letters  on  the  Study  and  Use  of  Hist  Lond.  1752.  2  vols.  Bra  Philoeophical  worka^  Lond. 
1754.  5  vols.  4.  [Works  with  Life.  Philad.  1841.  4  yols.  ^^WarlmrtofCt  (fip.)  Tiew  of  tba  Phfkn. 
of  B.  Lond.  1766.  8.] 

ft)  Acta  hist  eco.  vol.  IX.  p.  298.  XL  p.  2608iL 

0)  Christianity  not  founded  on  Argnment  Lond.  (1749L 1748.)  1746^ 

p)  Especially  NaiK.  Lardner,  Credibility  of  the  Gospel  History.  Lond.  (1727.)  ITSa-Cfi.  8  Toh. 
[Works  with  Life  by  Kippis^  Lond.  188S.  10  vols,  a] 

g)  Inquiry  concerning  the  Unman  Understanding.  Lond.  1748.  Dialogues  oonoenilnip  Nat  Bell- 
gion.  Lond.  177&  Life  of  David  Hnme,  by  himselt  Lond.  1777.  [PbfloSb  Works.  Edinb.  lS26w  4  vols. 
&  Essayai  Edinb.  2  volai  &]~irakA,  nst  Bel  Oesdi.  vol.  YUL  p^  iOSflL  Jatobi^  D.  H.  1787. 
(Werke,  vol.  II.)    ZschiMchs,  de  Ilumto  seeptico.  HaL  1886. 

r)  Acta  hist  ecc  noetrl  temp.  voL  XXL  p.  848Bik 


CHAP.  L    EYANO.  CHUBGH  TILL  ITSa    f  41(k  DIPPEL.    EDELMANN.        501 

didate  for  the  ministry  from  Eolstein,  asserted  (1764)  tliat  a  congregation 
of  persons  calling  themselves  ConBcientiarians  (conscientiarii)  were  exten* 
sively  spread  in  varioas  parts,  who  maintained  tliat  the  Christian  Koran  was 
quite  as  inconsistent  with  itself,  and  as  unworthy  of  confidence,  as  the  Tnrk« 
Ish  Koran,  and  that  we  shoold,  like  Enoch  and  Noah,  without  the  fahle  of 
Christ,  depend  entirely  upon  our  reason.  This  they  contended  was  the  con- 
science which  mother  nature  has  implanted  in  the  breast  of  every  man,  and 
which,  as  it  is  found  not  merely  in  one  but  in  many  and  all  intelligent  per- 
sons, teaches  us  to  injure  no  one,  and  to  leave  all  to  the  possession  of  what 
belongs  to  them.  Hence  they  taught  that  if  any  one  despised  this  Bible,  ho 
must  necessarily  despise  himself.  They  denied  the  existence  of  a  God  and  a 
devil,  a  heaven  and  a  hell,  except  such  as  is  created  by  conscience,  and  they 
regarded  married  women  and  prostitutes  as  equally  respectable,  and  all  priests 
and  magistrates  as  useless.  These  sentiments  were  boldly  and  plainly  pro- 
mulgated by  popular  tracts  extensively  distributed  among  the  people.  (») 
The  bitter  railings  which  Dippel  (d.  1784),  under  the  name  of  the  Christian 
Democritna,  published  against  what  he  called  the  Protestant  papacy  and  its 
yicarious  atonement,  were  the  offspring  of  a  Pietism  which  he  carried  to 
such  a  degree  of  refinement  that  every  thing  historical  and  external  in  Chris- 
tianity vanished  from  his  system.  (J)  Excited  by  his  writings,  and  following 
the  path  marked  out  by  Knutzen,  Edelmann  (d.  1767)  believed  that  he  was 
called  to  be  a  second  Luther,  and  looked  upon  the  Scriptures  as  a  collection 
of  fragments,  which  were  awkwardly  put  together  after  passing  through  hun- 
dreds and  thonsands  of  credulous  lips.  In  rude  but  vigorous  language  he  denied 
the  claims  of  every  religion  founded  upon  revelation,  that  he  might  like  a  genu- 
ine freethinker,  emancipated  from  the  shackles  of  Christianity,  prepare  the 
way  for  a  religion  corresponding  with  reason  and  experience.  Such  a  reli- 
gion he  contended  would  make  a  Christ  of  every  man,  whom  he  regarded  as 
an  individual  though  imperfect  organ  of  the  universal  Spirit  and  the  divine 
Logos.  His  writings  were  burnt  by  order  of  the  emperor  (1750),  but  he  was 
protected  by  Frederic  U.  (u) 


«)  J.  JTtfMMtfA,  AbleinoDg  d.  Yerlenmbdung,  ob  ware  in  Jena  e.  neuo  Secte  d.  Gew.  entstandeD. 
Jea.  (1674.)  187&.  4.  In  the  Append,  to  Kontzen's  **  Cbarteqven.''  BerL  Monfttscbr.  Apr.  u.  Aug.  1801. 
H.  SosMd,  In  the  8tnd.  a.  Krit  1844.  P.  4. 

f)  Collectioni  of  his  writings :  EruflTn.  Wog  z.  Frieden  m.  Oott  n.  alien  Crcaturen  darch  Cbr. 
0einoa  (1709.)  Berleb.  1747.  8  vola.  4.  Walch,  R.  Str.  vol  II.  p.  71868.  H.  J.  W.  (Hoffmann)  Leben 
n.  Me4n.  Dip.  Darmst.  1782.     W.  Klme,  J.  Dipp.  (Zeitsch.  t  hist  Th.  1S51.  II.  8.) 

«)  Unjchnld.  Wahrheiten.  17858&  15  St.  Moses  tnlt  aufgcdecktcn  Ange».  Frcyb.  (Berleb.)  1740. 
t  AablldKe.  Die  OutUichk.  d.  Vernunft.  1741.  Sendscbr.  den  Vorzng.  e.  Frergeists  vor  e.  annen 
Sander  leigend.  Freyst  1749.— Selbstbiogr.  (1752.)  ed.  by  Klow,  Brl.  1849.-^.  II.  J*ra0«,  hist 
Naehr.  t.  Ed.  Uamb.  17fi&     W.  EUUr,  £ria  an  Ed.  in  Bczug  a.  Stranaa.  Clausth.  1889. 


502  MODERN  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  YL    A.  D.  1M&-1861 

§  417.     The  Quaiers. 

Catecb.  et  fldei  Cont  Roter.  16T6l  Lps.  1752.  Roh.  Burelay^  Th«K>L  vere  cbr.  Apol.  Amst  1676L  4.  and 
oft  Penn^  Summary  of  the  hist,  ductr.  and  dl»cipL  of  Friends.  1692.  ed.  6. 1707.  m.  Anm.  v.  Sfehohm^ 
Pynii.  (1792.)  179S.  Rnles  of  disclpl.  of  the  Soc  of  Friend*.  Lond,  178.3.  ed.  a  1S84.— (7.  Croei,H  H. 
Qnakeriana.  Amst  (1695.)  1704.  Alberti^  Xachr.  t.  d.  Rel.  d.  Q.  Ilann.  1750.  Gtmyhnn^  H.  of  th€> 
people  called  Quakers.  Dubl.  17S9.  4  vols.  F.  Clarkson^  Portraiture  of  Qnakerisme.  Lond.  ]906l  3- 
yoU  //.  Tukf,  [Principles  of  Uelij^ion  as  hold  by  Christians  eonimocly  called  Quakers,  iu  Germ.  A; 
Engl.  L*jnd.  ond  Lpz.  1S2S.  S.]  J.  J.  Gurney^  Obss.  on  the  society  of  Friends.  Lond  1S24.  ed.  7 
18S4.  [  W.  Setc^lf,  11.  of  the  Quaker?.  Lond.  and  New  York.  1840.  2  roh.  8.  W.  /?.  WuffHaf,  H.  of 
the  Soc  of  Friends  New  York.  1SS&  a] 

George  Fox  (d.  1691),  a  shoemaker  from  the  county  of  Leicester,  who 
felt  called  hy  inward  visions  to  become  a  reformer  of  the  ungodliness  which 
prevailed  around  him,  founded  (after  1649)  in  the  stormy  times  of  tlie  revo- 
lution the  society  of  Friends^  commonly  called  Quakers,  (a)  The  essential 
principle  of  their  faith  was  that  every  thing  of  a  religious  character  in  man 
is  the  result  of  an  immediate  operation  of  the  Spirit  of  God,  who  would 
come  to  all  who  quietly  waited  for  him.  They  therefore  look  upon  all  exter- 
nal rites  as  useless.  This  internal  revelation  proceeding  from  Christ  ever 
since  the  fall,  and  given  to  impart  everlasting  life  to  man,  they  regard  on 
of  equal  authority  with  the  Holy  Scriptures.  They  look  upon  the  sacraments 
as  merely  symbols  of  an  internal  state  of  mind,  and  therefore  not  necessary 
to  be  received  in  an  external  form ;  they  reject  the  office  of  the  regular 
clergy,  together  with  all  systems  of  theology,  on  the  ground  of  their  being 
human  inventions,  and  they  wish  to  have  no  church  but  that  of  the  Spirit. 
On  religious  grounds  they  decidedly  refuse  to  render  any  military  service,  to 
swear,  to  pay  tithes,  and  to  conform  to  the  fashions  of  the  world.  In  conse- 
quence of  the  violent  disturbances  of  public  worship  which  Fox  allowed  him- 
self and  his  followers  to  make,  and  their  refusal  to  perform  the  duties  ordi- 
narily required  of  citizens,  many  of  the  Quakers  were  thrown  into  prisons 
and  lunatic  asylums,  until  WillUim  Penn  (d.  1718),  a  man  worthy  of  the 
crown  as  well  as  of  the  cross,  determined  to  establish  a  home  for  his  com- 
panions in  the  faith,  as  well  as  for  religious  freedom  generally.  He  purchased 
the  lands  situated  on  the  Delaware,  and  formed,  under  the  sovereignty  of 
the  Englisli  crown,  and  by  means  of  colonies  nearly  half  of  whose  citizens 
were  Quakers,  the  state  of  Pennsylvania,  for  a  long  time  the  cradle  of  Ub- 
orty  for  the  African  and  for  the  worid.  (h)  The  same  privileges  as  were 
enjoyed  by  the  Dissenters  generally  in  England  were  acquired  (1 686)  by  the 
Friends,  and  their  conscientious  scruples  were  treated  with  the  utmost  indul- 
gence. Only  a  few  congregations  still  exist  in  Holland,  in  England  they  are 
decreasing,  in  Northern  Germany  they  have  become  extinct,  and  bnt  a  sin- 


a)  Collect  of  Cbr.  Epistles  vrritten  bj  G.  Fox,  Lond.  169S.  2  vols,  t  Joursal  of  the  Lifb,  TniTels 
and  Snffcrin;;:8  of  G.  Fox.  Lond.  1691.  and  often.  [Pbilad.  1836.  &  Complete  Works  of  6.  F.  TbUkd. 
1831.  8  vols.  8.    //  Thikt,  Memoirs  of  the  Life  of  O.  F.  Lond.  12.] 

h)  Works.  Lond.  1726.  2  vols,  t  (W.  A.  TtlUr)  Lebensbeschr.  W.  P.  BrL  1T79.  Ci^irtson,  Me- 
moirs of  the  private  and  publ.  life  of  W.  P.  ISIS.  2  vols.  Memoirs  of  the  Hist  Societj  of  PeBosyl- 
vanla.  Philad.  1840.  vol.  IV,  1.  [R  IT.  Draper,  Life  of  W.  P.  Lond.  1826u  24.]  Corren>oiuWnce  •>! 
J.  Logan  with  W.  P.  collected  by  Hannah  Penn,  Pbilad.  1821.  [J.  M,  Janney,  Lift  of  W.  P.  and 
8el.  from  Cor.  and  Antobiogr.  2  ed.  Philad-  1862.  a  WeerM'  Life  of  W.  P.  Philad.  12.  W.  JL 
Dix<m,  Hist  Biogr.  of  W.  P.  fh)m  new  sources,  new  ed.  Philad.  1851. 12] 


CHAP.  L    EVANG.  CHUBCH  TILL  1750.    |41&  ZINZENDOBF.  503 

gle  congregation  has  become  estcblished  in  Pjrmont  (1791).  (r)  Govem- 
ment  among  them  is  administered  on  democratic  principles,  by  a  series  of 
assemblies  gradaally  ascending  to  the  highest,  in  each  of  which  difficulties 
between  members  are  settled  by  arbitration.  Those  who,  in  the  contest  for 
American  freedom,  in  an  admirable  enthuj>iasm  temporarily  laid  aside  their 
peculiar  principles  and  took  up  arms  for  their  country,  and  those  who  i)ar- 
tially  renounced  the  rude  exterior  required  by  the  society,  while  moderately 
enjoying  their  well-earned  wealth,  although  tolerated  by  the  society  as  fight- 
ing, free,  lukewarm,  or  wet  Friends,  are  never  elected  as  deputies  to  their 
superior  assemblies.  The  enthusiasm  of  an  entire  reliance  upon  temporary 
inspirations  is  somewhat  moderated  by  an  education  inculcating  stillness  as 
one  of  its  primary  principles ;  but  the  secret  inclination  which  has  always 
characterized  this  system  to  bre^ik  loose  from  all  historical  Christianity,  has 
been  developed  during  the  nineteenth  century  in  many  American  congrega- 
tions by  Elias  Hicks.  This  has,  however,  given  occasion  for  an  expression 
of  a  more  decided  adherence  to  the  Holy  Scriptures  on  the  part  of  the 
other,  and  the  most  numerous  portion  of  the  members,  (fl)  In  the  com- 
manion  of  tliis  people,  Elizabeth  Fry  found  the  strength  and  courage  which 
enabled  her  to  penetrate  the  thousand  prisons  to  which  she  conveyed  the 
contrition  and  consolation  of  the  gospel,  (e) 

§  418.     Th4i  United  Brethren.     Zimendorf.     1700-1760. 

Zin»endorf:  Gcgeuw.  Gestalt  des  Krcuzreichs  Jesii  in  sr.  Unschuld.  Lps.  (1745.)  4  Htpi  iavTov 
0.  natarelle  Reflexione«.  (1746.)  4.  Jeremias  e.  Prcdigcr  d.  Ocrechtigk.  new  ed.  Brl.  1880.  Spnngen- 
berg^  Leben  d.  O.  v.  Z.  (Barby.)  1772n«».  8  vol.*.  7^  C.  r.  Schraut^ibach,  d.  Or.  v.  Z.  u.  d.  BrQder- 
gem.  tr.  ZelL  (1781)  od.  by  F.  W.  Kolhiug,  Gnad.  1851.  J.  W.  Verheet,  d.  O.  v.  Z  I^ben  u.  Char. 
Onad.  1645.—  Varnhtigen  von  Em«^  Lebcn  d.  G.  v.  Z.  (Bhtgr.  Donkm.  vol  V.)  Brl.  1830.— B&- 
dlngische  Sauiml.  einiger  in  d.  Kllist.  oIn.<<<;lilag.  Sclirr.  Bud.  1742^8.  8  vols.  Spnngenberg :  Nachr. 
V.  d.  gepenw.  Vert  d.  ev.  Hr.  V.  (^WalcJi,  nst.  Bel.  Ocsch.  vol.  III.)  5.  unip.  A.  Gnadau.  1S23.  Idea 
flde4  firatr.  o.  knrtzer  Bgr.  d.  chr.  Lchro.  Barb.  1779.  T^benslauf  v.  ihni  solbst.  {Henke'H  Arch,  t  n*t 
KG.  ToL  IL  St  8.)  Statntcn  d.  ev.  Br.  U.  Gnad.  1S19.— Z>.  Oranz^  alto  u.  nene  Br.derlii<.t  Barb. 
1772.  {lifgnrr)  Forta.  B.  1791-1S04.  Gnad.  1816.  8  vols.  Or.  v.  Li/nar.  Naclir.  v.  Un<pr.  u.  ge^jrenn-. 
Vert  d.  a  U.  1778.  2  ed.  llaL  1781.  Ch.  C.  F.  SchuUf,  v.  Kntst.  u.  Einr.  d.  ev.  Brudtrfrorn.  Goth 
1928.  L  Schaaf,  d.  ev.  Brudergem.  Lpa.  1825.  F.  Litit*^  Blicko  In  d.  Vorgangcnh.  u.  Gegenw.  der 
Br&derk.  Lpa.  1846.  {A.  G.  Spandenberg^  Expos,  of  tho  Chr.  Doct  as  taught  in  the  Prou  Church 
<tf  the  U.  B.  with  Pre£  by  La  Trobt^  Lon«l.  1796.  S.  D.  Crantz,  H.  of  the  U.  B.  LontL  17S0.  8.  JC 
fftigenbach,  KGeach.  dcs  18.  u.  19.  Jabrh.  2  ed.  Th.  L  Vorlcs.  18.  Lps.  1S49.  2  Th.  12.] 

Louis,  Count  of  Zimend<yrj\  even  when  a  boy  at  the  orphan  house,  was 
filled  with  the  idea  which  Spener  had  inculcated,  of  reforming  the  Church 
and  establishing  it  among  the  heathm  by  planting  it  in  their  midst  as  a 
grain  of  mustard-seed.  His  aspirations  received  a  permanent  direction  under 
the  influence  of  the  Moravian  brethren,  who  had  formed  a  settlement  on  his 
estates  at  Berthelsdorf,  to  which  other  newly-awakened  persons  were  added, 
until  he  succeeded  in  laying  (1722)  the  foundation  of  tho  congregation  of 
Jlerrnhut^  on  the  Ilutberg.  Under  his  influence  the  hostile  spirits  among  his 
people  were  conciliated,  the  ecclesiastical  constitution  which  ho  proposed  to 

c)  J.  E.  Schmidt  Qackkergomeinde  in  Pyrm.  Bmschw.  1805. 

d)  Et.  K.  Z.  182a  p.  805SS.  1S29.  p.  7S2ss.  1S40.  p.  141m. 

«)  Lebcn  tL  DenkwQrdigk.  dor  Frau  Elia.  Fry.  Ilamb.  2  ed.  1S50.  2  to]&    [J.  Timpwn^  Memoirs 
or  £.  Frj.  LcindL  1346.  Mew  Tork.  1S47.  2  vols.] 


504  MODERN  CHUBGH  HISTOBT.    PER.  VL    A.  D.  16IB-UN. 

them  was  accepted  (1727),  and  in  a  short  time  their  missionaries  wandered 
fojth  among  the  heathen.    The  religion  which  he  tangfat  was  founded  npon 
the  Bihle,  but  inculcated  very  free  opinions  respecting  it,  and  consisted  prin- 
oipally  in  exercises  of  the  most  confiding  love  to  the  Savionr.    This  lore 
exalted  it  above  all  distinctions  in  ecclesiastical  creeds,  hut  prodneed  no 
anxiety  to  abolish  them.    Hence  the  congregation  gradnally  became  organ- 
ized into  three  different  tropes,  called  the  Moravian,  the  Lutheran,  and  the 
Reformed.    Their  ordinary  devotions  were  principally  taken  up  with  refer- 
ences to  the  corporeal  part  of  the  expiatory  sufferings  of  Jesus,  and  their 
natural  relations  of  conjugal  life  were  strangely  connected  with  those  of  a 
religious  character.    With  a  mind  remarkably  inclined  to  extravagance,  and 
with  inexhaustible  powers  for  communicating  with  others  on  religious  sub- 
jects by  oral  discourses,  and  singing  directly  from  the  heart,  (a)  in  the  half 
French  court  dialect  of  his  time,  and  yet  with  a  singular  £Eu:ility  for  snggest- 
ing  the  most  exalted  themes  by  the  use  of  the  most  common  comparisons, 
Zinzendorf  was  fond  of  playing  with  allusions  to  the  wounds  of  the  Lamb, 
and  with  the  boldest  images  of  sexual  love.    The  offence  which  this  gave  to 
the  theologians  of  his  day,  was  hardly  capable  of  augmentation  by  the  fan- 
tastic notions  which  ho  advanced  respecting  the  persons  of  the  sacred  Trinity, 
and  various  suspicious  circumstances  which  became  known  in  his  commu- 
nity, (h)    It  was  with  the  utmost  diflBculty  that  the  count  broke  through  the 
prejudices  of  his  order  so  as  to  reach  the  clerical  office,  but  he  was  finally 
recognized  at  Tubingen  as  a  candidate,  and  ordained  to  the  episcopal  office 
by  a  Moravian  bishop  at  Berlin.    But  having  attained  this  official  position, 
his  rank  and  education  were  of  important  service  to  him  in  his  spiritual  du- 
ties.   After  a  ten  years^  banishment  f^om  Saxony,  he  succeeded,  as  a  Chris- 
tian statesman,  in  inducing  the  ecclesiastical  council  of  Electoral  Saxony  to 
recognize  the  connection  of  his  congregations  with  the  churches  professing 
the  Augsburg  Confession  (1748),  and  in  obtaining  from  Parliament  a  regular 
enactment  which  recognized  them  as  constituent  members  of  the  Episcopal 
Church  (1749).    Although  the  humblest  of  the  humble,  he  demanded  implicit 
submission  to  his  official  power  of  binding  and  loosing,  (c)  and  infused  into  hia 
works  so  much  of  the  principle  of  life,  that  it  could  very  soon  exist  without 
him.    After  a  brief  season  of  enjoyment,  he  generally  withdrew  ftom  those 
who  were  in  various  ways  excited  and  inspired,  (d)    But  although  the  Breth- 
ren established  settlements  in  all  parts  of  the  world,  Zinzendorf  was  still  pre- 
pared with  the  most  restless  and  extreme  activity  to  labor  to  win  p^aons  of 
every  class  in  society  to  the  love  of  his  Lord.    Each  congregation  is  divided 
into  choirs  according  to  age,  sex,  and  matrimonial  connection.    Within  the 
general  bond  of  the  congregation  is  embraced  at  once  all  civil,  and  many 

<i)  Geistl  Oedlchte  d  Gr.  Z.  geBammelt  n.  geelohtot  t.  A.  Knapp,  Btattg:  184&.  Stud.  u.  Krit 
ISiaiLS. 

h)  (After  Fresenias,  17478&  and  BengeU  1751.)  Das  entdeokte  OebelmnlM  d.  Bosh.  d.  Herrah. 
Becte.  FrkC  1749.  J.  SUnatra,  Warnnng  vor  d.  Fanaticism,  from  the  Dntoh.  BrL  1752.  [Stin«ira*» 
Pastoral  Letter  against  Fanaticism  lias  been  transl.  into  Engl  with  a  Nair.  of  the  Blaa  and  Pro^  of 
the  Moravians  by  liimim,  Lond.  1758.  8.  Motheim,  Eoe.  H.  Cent  ZYIII.  §  IT.  nt  I  Maffmbaek, 
KGeach.  des  la  a.  19.  Jhb.  Erster  Tb.  Yorleaa.  la  &  19. 

c)  Acta  hist  eco^  yoL  VL  p.  5«9aa.       d)  Ibid,  roL  lY.  p.  Mlaa 


CHAP.  L    SYANG.  CHUBCH  TILL  ITSa    {419.  METHODISTS.  505 

profflBsional  and  external  relations,  but  some  who  ore  called  Friends  may 
also  reside  beyond  the  limits  of  the  settlement  (cV  diaanopa).  As  the  congre* 
gation  consbta  only  of  those  who  are  called  the  Awakened,  it  follows  that 
those  who  may  become  lakewarm  fall  under  the  disoipline  of  the  Chniyh. 
This  ooDsists  in  admonition,  ezclasion  from  the  Lord's  Supper,  from  church 
fellowship,  and  finally  from  the  congregation.  The  officers  are  deacons, 
elders,  and  bishops,  though  these  last  possess  no  exclusive  prerogatives. 
Every  settlement  is  under  the  government  of  a  conference  composed  of  its 
officers,  and  the  whole  Unity  is  governed  by  a  conference  of  the  elders,  the 
seat  of  which  is  established  at  Berthelsdorf,  and  calls  from  every  four  to  ten 
years  a  general  synod,  at  which  its  own  vacancies  are  filled  and  all  important 
measures  are  decided  upon.  Every  thing  beyond  the  reach  of  human  calcu- 
lation is  intrusted  to  a  decision  by  the  lot,  as  they  believe  that  Jesus  has  such 
a  direct  connection  with  their  affairs,  that  in  such  a  proceeding  he  directs  the 
result,  (e)  The  system  of  government  among  the  United  Brethren  is  the 
same  with  that  of  the  Pietists,  although  the  mild  and  cheerful  disposition  of 
Ziozendorf  could  not  accede  to  the  requirement  of  penitential  convulsions, 
and  he  therefore  was  not  on  intimate  terms  with  the  Orphan  House.  The 
objectionable  expressions  which  Zinzendorf  had  used  in  the  early  part  of  his 
coarse,  were  finally  recalled  by  himself,  and  still  more  decidedly  by  his  judi- 
cious and  learned  successor,  Spangenhurg  (d.  1792).  (/)  The  piety  of  the 
Hermhutters  soon  degenerated  into  a  peculiar  mannerism,  and  it  became  per- 
vaded by  a  commercial  worldly  spirit  {g)  Yet  many  a  quiet  or  broken 
heart  found  a  home  among  them,  and  the  genuine  Ohrist  of  earlier  days 
found  there  a  sanctuary  in  times  of  infidelity  and  unbelief. 

§419.     The  ifethodists.     Wesley.    1703-91.     WhiUfield.    1714-70. 

The  works  of  J.  WcAley.  Bristol.  1771  ss.  83  y.  i?.  ScfvUhetf^  Life  of  J.  W.  At  the  rise  an'l  pro^res 
or  MetbudUm.  ed.  a  Lond  184«.  2  vols,  a  JT.  Moore^  Life  of  J.  W.  Lond.  1824«.  9  toK  R.  Watton, 
Obm,  on  Southey's  Life  of  W.  Lund.  ed.  4. 1833.— Life  of  G  Wbiteflold.  Edinb.  1S26.  edited  after  thd 
Eofl  by  Tholuck  in  Germ.  Lpz.  1834.  [J.  GiUU*,  Memoirs  of  G.  W.  Hartford.  1S85.  S.  R.  PhlUp, 
Ltfc  A,  Tlmea  of  O.  W.  Lond.  1887. 12.  New  York.  1833.  12.]-V.  O.  Barckhard,  vollst.  Gescb.  d. 
Mcth.  In  Engl  N&mb.  1795.  2  volai  J.  Croicther,  Portraiture  of  Mctb.  Lond.  1815.  J.  W.  Btum^  der 
Meth.  Z&r.  183S.  T.  Jachton^  [Hist  of  tlie  Commencement,  Prog,  ds  Present  State  of  Metli.  Load. 
188Sl  Imac  Taylor^  Wesley  k,  Motli.  Lond.  1851.  8.  J.  WhiUh^ad,  Lives  of  J.  &  ( •.  Wesley.  Lond. 
17WL  2  Tola.  8.  Moore's  Lives  of  J.  &  C  W.  k  Accotint  of  Great  RovlvaK  Lond.  IS'24.  2  vob.  8.  J. 
Ilampkon^  Mem.  of  Wealey  it  II.  of  Methodism.  Lond.  1791.  8  vols.  8.  Doa  k,  Hist  Invest  of  Metb. 
In  Ita  Conncctlonal  Prin.  k  Pol.  2  ed.  Lund.  1852.  Minutes  of  Conferences  in  Engl.  fh>m  1744  to 
19M.  Lond.  1824.  9  vols.  8.    &  Warren,  Chronicles  k  Digest  of  Laws,  ^ba  of  Metb.  Lond.  1897.  8 

A  revival  of  great  importance  with  respect  to  England  and  North  Amer- 
ica had  its  origin  in  an  association  of  pious  students  whom  John  Wesley  col- 
lected around  him  at  Oxford  (1729),  and  who  were  called  Methodists,  on 
aooount  of  their  precise  and  strictly  holy  lives.  During  his  long  life  the  only 
thought  that  seemed  to  fill  the  mind  of  Wesley  was  that  of  the  salvation  of 
souls.    In  connection  with  him  was  Whitefleld^  under  whose  preaching  the 


«)  Yet  oomp.  Allg.  K.  Z.  18S3.  N.  118.    aehratOenhack,  p.  85s. 

/)  K.  F.  L&dderhoM,  d.  Leben  A.  O.  Spang.  Heldlb.  1846. 

g)  Die  Herrnh.  In  Leben  n.  Wtrken,  y.  ei  dbem.  Mitglied«.  WeUn.  1880. 


506  MOD£RN  CUURCH  HISTOBY.    PER  YL    A.  D.  1MB-180B. 

hearts  of  multitudes  were  shaken,  and  who  felt  that  he  needed  more  tongaes 
and  bodies  and  souls  in  the  service  of  the  Lord  than  was  bestowed  on  men 
for  ordinary  purposes.  As  he  travelled  from  land  to  land,  wherever  the  Eng- 
lish languiigo  was  understood,  this  seraphic  preacher  flung  his  words  like 
firebrands  amoiijx  all  classes  in  every  extreme  of  society.  The  Methodists  did 
not  at  first  desire  a  separation  from  the  Episcopal  Church ;  but  when  they 
were  i)crsecuted  in  various  ways  in  that  church,  they  began  to  form  a  society 
embraciii<r  many  congregations,  subject  to  a  rigid  system  of  ecclesiastical  dis- 
cii)line,  and  under  the  jurisdiction  of  superintendents  and  synods.  At  an  early 
j)eriod  they  held  some  comnmnication  with  the  Pietists  and  Ilerrnhutters,  bnt 
they  soon  withdrew  from  the  latter,  as  their  religious  life  did  not  commence 
with  a  gentle  <levelopment  of  the  feelings,  but  with  a  violent  assault  upon  the 
selfishness  of  human  nature,  and  a  painful  process  of  regeneration.  They 
therefore  re()uired  that  their  converts  should  be  able  to  tell  of  a  distinct  time 
in  which  they  found  divine  grace,  and  they  preferred  to  hear  that  that  period 
was  one  of  even  violent  corporeal  excitement.  On  this  account  their  elo- 
quence, which  glowed  with  })ictures  of  hell,  had  the  greatest  succees  among 
those  who  had  hitherto  lived  lives  of  irreligion,  or  at  least  were  then  incapa- 
ble of  feeling  any  higher  appeal.  As  Wesley  was  Arminian,  and  Whitefield 
Calvinistic  on  the  subject  of  divine  grac«,  they  finally  separated  from  each 
other  (1740),  but  the  Wesley ans  were  the  most  numerons.  Their  principal 
danger  was  ])erceived  and  guarded  against  by  Wesley,  and  consisted  in  on 
indifference  to  the  moral  law  while  the  mind  was  taken  up  with  the  ble^ed- 
ness  of  a  lively  faith.  It  became  most  developed  in  the  case  of  Fletcher^  a 
man  who  may  be  truly  called  a  mirror  of  a  ministerial  life,  wholly  loat  in 
God.  {a)  The  special  providential  mission  of  this  people  was  to  act  as  leaven 
in  the  midst  of  the  Episcopal  Church,  then  sunk  in  the  deepest  formality,  and 
to  take  an  interest  in  the  poor  and  neglected  classes  among  the  people.  Hence, 
although  their  number  at  the  present  time  in  both  hemispheres  probably 
amounts  to  a  million,  their  influence,  principally  by  means  of  uneducated  itin- 
erant preachers,  is  probably  still  more  extensive.  The  sacred  struggle  for 
liberty  which  was  so  long  sustained  by  Wilberforce,  originated  to  a  great  ex- 
tent among  the  Methodists,  {b) 

§  420.     The  Church  of  the  New  Jeritsalem,    Swedenbarg,     1688-1772. 

Sitedenhorg :  Arcana  coclestla.  (Lond.)  174988.  7  t.  4  «d.  Tafel,  Tab.  ISSSn.  5  v.  Yen  ehr.  ni 
coupl.  nnlv.  Thool.  novae  Ecc  Am5t  1771.  2  v.  4.  A  series  of  writings  by  h  re.<^*cting  Sw.  comma- 
nlcated  by  Imra.  Tafel  &  Liidw.  llofiwker,  especially:  Oottl.  OiTeiibb.  from  tlie  Lat  Tub.  ISStek  3 
vols.  Die  Chrlstusre'.  in  ihrer  Aecbth.  Tub.  ISSla.  4  vols.  Katochismns  u.  d.  Lehre  d.  N.  K.  Tttbt 
1830.  (.VAcr  the  Catechism  of  the  General  Conference  Lond.  1S2S.)  Taftl^  vergL  Dmrst  a.  Benrth. 
d.  Lehrgegens.  der  Kath.  u.  Prot  Zugliech.  Dar»t  d.  Unterscheidungsl.  9w.  TQb.  1S35.  Tafil,  S.  v. 
6.  Gc?ner.  Tub.  1^41.  2  voU— J/TjW^r,  Tub.  Quartalschr.  1S30.  P.  4.  r©vi.sod  in  his  Symbolilc  Oliler 
matters  in  :  Stdiullin,  Idrchl.  Googr.  vol.  I.  p.  246«s.  Latest  liter,  accounts  in  Kh^imcui*/^  Bep.  1SS4 
vol.  IX.  p.  21  (MM.  A.  K.  Z.  Lit  Bl.  1S36.  N.  05s8.  Ifaug,  d.  Lehro  d.  neuon  K.  (dtudien  (L  ev.  GeistL 
WOrt.  1&42.  vuL  XIV.)    a  F.  Xanz,  E.  Sw.  d.  nord.  Scher.  Schw.  Uall.  2  cd.  1850.    [Many  Works 


a)  Lebtn  Fletschors,  m.  Vorr.  v.  Tbolnck.  BrL  18.38,    [J.  Benson,  Life  of  F.  Lond.  12.— Ch«cks 
to  Antinom.  by  J.  Fletcher.  New  York.    Works  of  J.  F.  Now  York.  4  v.  S,] 

b)  Life  of  W.  Wilb.  by  his  sons.  Lond.  1S88.  4  v.    [Pbllad.  revised  by  CL  Monis.  1S41.  %  r.  18.] 


CHAP.  L    EVAXG.  CnUBCH  TILL  ITSa    §480.  8WEDENB0RG.  507 

of  8w.  hare  been  translated  hy  different  peiBons  &  publ.  by  O,  Clapp  of  Boston.  IS(S-&1.  J.  0. 
WiUtinton,  Biogr.  of  £.  Sw.  Boston.  1S49.  12.  A.  CUmvIJ,  Practical  nat  of  tiie  D'>ctt.  of  £.  8.  Boet 
1S89. 12.    A'.  Hagenhach,  KOesch.  (p.  49S.)  Th.  L  Vorles.  21.] 

Emanuel  von  Sicedenhorg^  who  was  an  assessor  in  the  Miners'  College  at 
Stockholm,  had  been  highly  educated  in  many  branches  of  science,  and  had 
contribnted  much  to  increase  a  knowledge  of  mechanics  and  mining  opera- 
tions in  general.  As  ho  was  continually  pursuing  his  researches  farther  and 
farther  into  the  mysteries  of  nature,  during  his  internal  religious  conflicts, 
he  attached  himself  to  every  kindred  spirit  of  whom  he  could  learn  any  thing, 
from  the  time  of  Birgitto  to  that  of  Jacob  Boehme,  and  he  came  to  the  conclu- 
sion that  he  was  himself  honored  by  an  intercourse  wnth  the  spirits  of  another 
world,  who  manifested  themselves  to  him  inwardly,  but  with  the  necessary 
semblance  of  an  external  form,  {a)  Sometimes  in  quaint,  but  sometimes  also 
in  very  ingenious  language,  in  the  style  of  a  Northern  Dante  he  described  his 
visions,  in  which  were  pictures  of  every  terrestrial  state,  and  in  a  few  in- 
stances of  rare  sagacity  ho  made  it  appear  as  if  he  really  had  such  an  inter- 
course with  spirits,  (b)  It  was  hot,  however,  until  ho  received  a  revelation 
directly  from  the  Lord  that  he  felt  called  upon  to  attempt  the  deliverance  of 
Christianity  from  the  corruption  into  which  it  had  fallen  from  tlie  time  of  the 
Council  of  Nica'a,  and  to  establish  the  Church  of  the  New  Jerusidom  as  the 
third  Testament  of  God  to  man,  and  the  spiritual  second  advent  of  Christ. 
A  few  congregations  of  this  new  church,  principally  formed  on  the  basis  of 
his  writings,  which  were  regarded  as  sacred  books,  were  collected  together 
in  Enghmd  and  in  North  America  (after  1788),  and  were  represented  in  an- 
nual General  Conferences  (after  1815).  In  Sweden  his  views  have  obtained 
extensive  prevalence  among  the  educated  classes,  and  in  Wurtemberg  they 
have  been  promulgated  by  Oetinger^  (c)  and  revived  by  the  enthusiastic  co- 
operation of  the  pious  librarian,  Tafel,  The  doctrines  of  Swedenborg  are  a 
fantastic  species  of  rationalism,  which,  in  place  of  the  expiatory  sacrifice  of 
Christ  and  the  Trinity,  substitutes  a  three-fold  revelation  of  the  one  God,  who 
was  obliged  to  become  man,  that  he  might  give  a  human  character  to  the  doc- 
trines of  faith,  and  drive  back  the  powers  of  hell.  There  is  an  organ  in  every 
man  for  communication  with  the  spiritual  world,  which  can  be  emancipated. 
The  secret  and  spiritual  sense  of  th©  sacred  Scriptures  are  of  no  use  except 
to  illustrate  the  truths  derived  from  the  literal  sense,  and  to  elevate  them  to 
the  view  of  reason,  {d)  The  friends  of  this  system,  therefore,  might  on  the 
one  hand  be  fond  of  every  mysterious  phenomenon  in  nature  and  in  the 
spiritual  world,  and  on  the  other,  receive  Christianity  as  a  religion  of  reason.  («) 
It  was  ])ossible  also  for  them  to  regard  their  views  as  the  gradual  and  con- 
tinued development  of  Protestantism,  and  while  they  merely  contended  for 


a)  (Kant)  Truumc  einos  Gelstersohcns  eritiutert  darcb  Trdnme  dcr  Mctapbvsik.  KSnigsb.  1766. 
^ie^er.  In  ».  Arc1.Iv.  vol.  III.  St  1.  VuL  VIII.  SL  2.  J.  Qorre%^  8w.  s.  VLMonen  u.  Verb,  z,  K.  Straasb. 
1827. 

ft)  8amml.  d.  Urkanden  betr.  Lcben  n.  Cbarakter  Sw.  m.  Anm.  t.  Tafel.  T&b.  1S:)9. 

c)  Ofting^r,  Sw.  n.  andrcrird.  u.  hlniml  Phil.  Frkf  n.  L.  1765. 

</)  TifH,  d.  GottHchk.  d.  H.  S.  o.  d.  tfefere  Schriftsinn.  Tub.  1888. 

e)  La  rel.  dii  bon-»ens,  e.xpos6  prullm.  k  la  doctr.  de  la  nonr.  Jdr.  Par.  1882.  Oegger^  noar.  qnet- 
tloDS  i»blL  Bern.  1335. 


508  MODERN  CHURCH  BISTORT.    PER.  YL    A.  D.  16iS-1688L 

the  laying  aside  of  creeds,  they  preached  that  theirs  was  the  Johannic  church 
of  the  futnre.  (/) 

§  421.     Minor  Fanatical  Parties, 

F.  W^  KruQ^  krlt  Oesch.  d.  prot  rel.  Schw&rtnereL  Sectir.  a.  widerkirchl  Nener  im  QroastL.  Ver;^ 
£1b«rf.  1S51.  M.  Gobel,  Gesch.  dos  chr.  Lebens  in  d.  rboin.  weati>h.  K.  ISM.  vol.  IL  F.  W.  Bar" 
thold^  d.  Erweekten  im  prot  Deatschl  Ansgang.  d.  17.  a.  vnte  H&lfte  d.  18.  Jtib.  b«s.  d.  fyomiiMB. 
Orafenh(iA).  (Raumen  hist  Taschenb.  1852  A  58.) 

1.  John  Labadif^  a  canon  of  Amiens,  dissatisfied  with  the  Jesuits  and 
their  opponents,  soaght  in  the  Reformed  Church  a  people  of  God,  who  wor- 
shipped Christ  in  sincerity  (1650).  He  agreed  with  that  Church  in  its  doo- 
trinal  views,  and  he  was  anxious  to  revive  the  external  organization  which 
prevailed  in  the  apostolic  age.  The  germ  of  his  church  was  composed  of 
certain  regenerate  persons,  whom  he  formed  into  a  devotional  family,  and 
which  followed  the  deposed  pastor  of  Middlehurg  as  an  independent  congre- 
gation. The  Mary  of  this  community  was  the  eminently  gifted  Schurman^  (a) 
hut  he  himself  was  every  where  rejected,  until  an  asylum  was  granted  him  in 
Altona  (1674).  Deprived  of  its  leader  the  congregation  soon  dwindled  awaj 
in  the  Netherlands,  and  hecame  the  forerunners  of  the  Pietists  in  a  sectarian 
form,  (b)  2.  A  gloomy  flame  was  occasionally  kindled  in  different  places  hy 
the  writings  of  Boehme.  Quirintu  Kuhlmann  of  Breslau,  a  poet^  whose  life 
was  itself  a  continual  poem,  wandered  over  the  earth  full  of  glowing  love  for 
the  Redeemer,  and  urged  on  hy  a  vague  impulse  that  he  was  to  revolutionize 
the  world,  until  he  was  humed  at  the  stake  in  Moscow  (1689.)  (e)  Gichtel 
(d.  1710)  of  Ratisbon  broke  up  all  his  civil  and  social  connections,  that  he 
might,  like  an  oriental  saint,  abstract  himself  from  nature,  and  lose  himself 
entirely  in  the  Deity.  The  results  of  his  efforts  among  a  class  of  persons 
aiming  to  be  a  priesthood  after  the  order  of  Melohisedek,  to  expiate  the  ana 
of  other  men,  and  an  angelic  brotherhood  striving  to  live  free  from  earthly 
cares,  pleasures,  and  toils,  have  come  down  through  a  series  of  individuals  in 
Lower  Germany  to  the  nineteenth  century,  {d)  Daniel  Muelhr  (1716-82) 
thought  that  sacred  history  was  intended  to  be  an  allegory  to  represent 
general  ideas,  that  Adam  and  Christ  were  the  same  human  formation  of  the 
one  all-pervading  Deity,  that  the  sacred  writings  of  all  nations  were  equally 
divine,  and  that  he,  like  an  Elias,  was  called  to  redeem  the  world  from  the 
yoke  of  the  letter.  He  travelled  through  the  whole  northern  part  of  Ger- 
many to  announce  that  the  external  church  was  about  to  be  subverted,  and, 
although  he  died  under  an  impression  that  God  had  deceived  him,  he  has  even 
now  some  followers  who  reject  the  historical  Christ,  look  upon  infidels  as  their 
brethren,  and  are  waiting  for  MuoUer^s  return  to  set  np  a  universal  kingdom.  {$) 

/)  G.  A.  Werner,  since  1840:  Ev.  K.  Z.  1845.  p.  481s.  Zeitsch.  t  unlrte  ev.  K.  1851.  N.  81. 
a)  ZitKKr\pia  n  meliorii  sortis  electla  Alton.  1678.  Dess.  1782.  2  yols. 

h)  DeclAnttloDsch.  o.  Erkl.  d.  roinen  Lehre.  Hervord.  1671.  Waleh,  B.  Sir.  aoaaerli.  toL  IY.  |k 
858.    MoeUer,  Cimbr.  lit  vol.  III.  p.  858S. 

c)  Baylf,  Art  Kublou  n.  KublpMlter,  Unsoh.  Nsobriobton  1711.  p.  755. 1748.  pi  9656B.  ffarmiUrg, 
de  Q.  K.  (Mas.  Brem.  Th.  I.  p.  651n.)    Adtlung^  Oesoh.  menscbL  Narrh.  toI.  V.  pi  8n. 

d)  KifuUrtater,  neue  Engelbradenoh.  Nord.  1719.  Btinbeck,  Naeb.  t.  G.  LebeasL  o.  Ltbrs. 
BrL  1783.    (IIstIms)  O.  Leben  u.  Irrtbamer.  (Ev.  K.  £.  188L  N.  11m.) 

0)  KdUr,  Dan.  Maeller,  reL  Sobwfirmer  d.  18  Jabrh.  Lpx.  1884. 


CHAP.  L    KYANO.  CHURCH  TILL  175a    §  42t  SECTS  &  FACTIONS.  509 

8.  The  Hi^rew9^  foanded  by  a  candidato  whose  name  was  Verschoorer^  ap- 
peared (about  1730)  in  Leyden,  as  quiot  separatists*  who  held  that  every  one 
was  bonnd  to  read  the  Scriptares  in  the  original  languages,  and  that  the  merit 
of  Christ  was  so  great  that  his  elect  people  were  fVeed  from  all  guilt.  (/) 
4.  The  peasant  Jansun  carried  his  notions  of  predestination  to  such  an  ex- 
treme that  he  contended  that  every  thing  proceeded  from  God,  and  would 
finally  return  to  God,  consequently,  that  even  all  sin  was  effected  by  God, 
and  that  human  guilt  was  only  a  fiction  of  the  imagination.  On  his  expul- 
sion from  East  Friesland  (1740)  he  returned  thither  professedly  by  the  divine 
command,  and  proclaimed  that  the  country  was  soon  to  be  reduced  to  desola- 
tion. As  the  measures  taken  by  the  authorities  were  of  no  great  force,  he 
succeeded  in  maintaining  himself  witti  a  small  band  of  bold  followers  for  sev- 
eral years,  {g)  5.  Elias  Eller^  criminally  connected  (1729)  with  Anna^  a 
baker's  daughter,  afterwards  converted  by  him,  promised  a  pietistic  circle  of 
epicoree  at  Elberfeld  that  the  Messiah  should  be  born  a  second  time.  She  also, 
in  the  character  of  the  woman  clothed  with  the  sun,  knew  how,  in  direct  con- 
tradiction to  the  laws  of  nature,  to  show  from  the  Apocalypse  what  her  for- 
tune was  to  be.  The  city  of  Eonsdorf  was  constructed  by  them,  she  was 
much  esteemed  as  the  mother  of  Zion,  and  he  died  in  the  midst  of  the  high- 
est honors  (1744,  1750).  (h)  6.  In  Brueggle,  in  the  Ganton  of  Berne,  sprung 
up  on  excitement  among  the  children,  accompanied  by  pretended  prophecies 
and  visions.  In  this  movement  the  two  brothers  KohUr^  who,  while  boys, 
had  been  employed  in  various  kinds  of  magical  delusions,  made  themselves 
known  as  the  two  witnesses  mentioned  in  the  Apocalypse,  and  fixed  upon  a 
certain  day  in  which  they  declared  that  Christ  would  return  to  the  world. 
This  day,  however,  was  subsequently  postponed,  as  they  alleged,  in  conse- 
quence of  their  prayers.  They  poured  forth  the  most  abusive  epithets  upon 
the  Chnrch,  and  rioted  upon  the  donations,  and  shamefully  abused  the  wives 
of  those  who  were  duped  by  them.  Jerome  Kohler  was  strangled  at  the  gib- 
bet for  blasphemy  (1758),  and  although  he  confessed  himself  an  impostor,  his 
followers  thought  he  was  invulnerable,  and  they  expected  him  to  rise  again 
on  the  third  day.  (i)  7.  From  the  conventicles  still  proceeded  many  persons 
under  the  influence  of  religious  excitement ;  Prophets,  to  prepare  the  way 
for  the  speedy  return  of  Christ  to  the  world ;  Separatists,  who  protested 
against  the  corruptions  of  the  Church,  and  those  who  under  the  sensuous  re- 
action of  pietistic  feelings,  abused  the  liberty  of  God^s  children  in  the  indul- 
gence of  the  most  unbridled  licentiousness.  The  Counts  of  Witgenstein,  fVom 
financial  as  well  as  pious  considerations,  till  almost  the  middle  of  the  eighteenth 
century,  opened  their  little  principality  to  all  who  were  oppressed  on  account 
of  religion.  There  Socinians  and  inspired  persons  lived  together,  and  those  who 
liad  been  awakened  under  the  most  diverse  influences,  met  together  with  all 


/)  Acta  hist  t<»,  yoL  I.  pi  800.  VI,  lOeOsa. 

g)  AcU  hist  ecc.  vol.  V.  p.  18.  812«.  YI,  106Sml  Mas.  Brem.  voL  IL  p.  144at. 

K)  Oriuel  d.  VerwOst.  heiL  Stltte  o.  d.  Oebeimnitt  d.  Boah.  d.  Bonsd.  Secta.  Frkt  175a  2>. 
SMtUrmacKer^  Apologtei  Arab.  1750.  J.  tV.  Kmc^  Otsch.  d.  Bosh.  d.  Eller^ecte  sn  B.  Marb. 
175L  9  Tok. 

ij  Dm  sntd.  Gek.  d.  Bosh,  in  d.  BrOgglersecteu  Zur.  1753.  S  vols.  AcU  hist  eoc  vol  XVIL  p. 
106Ll06l8ii 


510  MODEBN  CIIUBCH  HISTORY.    FEB.  YL    A.  D.  164d-165& 

their  peculiarities,  (k)  It  was  there  that  Mother  Fee  (of  BuUer),  as  the  new 
incarnation  of  the  three  divine  persons,  with  her  sedacer  and  those  whom  she 
had  sednced,  hoped  to  establish  her  empire  (1702.)  Even  when  snrrendering 
herself  to  natural  indulgences  of  the  flesh,  as  well  as  to  shameful  crimes 
against  nature,  she  endeavored  to  lose  herself  in  the  wounds  of  Jesus,  and 
misused  the  words  of  Scripture  in  the  boldest  manner.  The  company  which 
she  assembled  were  plundered  by  the  counts  police,  and  were  soon  lost  In  the 
Oatholic  Church,  to  which  they  fled  for  protection.  (I) 

§  422.     Spread  of  Christianity. 

J.  Wifffferti^  Qcscb.  d.  prot  MLwion.  Hamb.  18156.  2  rolfc 

As  long  as  the  Catholic  powers  had  the  dominion  of  the  seas,  Protestant 
missions  were  necessarily  of  a  very  limited  extent.  The  United  Brethren 
formed  a  central  point,  from  which  went  forth  missionaries  to  every  quarter 
of  the  world  (since  1732) ;  but  the  gospel,  as  it  was  presented  by  the  Herm- 
hutters,  could  captivate  only  a  few  individuals,  and  could  operate  only  in  a 
very  narrow  circle,  (a)  1.  The  conversion  of  the  aboriginal  inhabitants  to 
Christianity  was  indispensable  to  the  safety  of  the  English  colonies  in  North 
America.  It  was  commenced  (1640)  by  John  Eliot^  with  the  conviction  that 
all  things  were  possible  to  those  who  diligently  toiled  and  prayed  with  faith 
in  Christ.  The  Puritans,  who  then  possessed  the  supreme  power,  established 
a  society  for  planting  Christianity  in  foreign  countries  (1647),  and  the  Method- 
ists also  forthwith  crossed  the  sea.  America,  however,  has  become  Christian, 
not  so  much  in  consequence  of  its  conversion,  as  of  its  colonies,  (b)  2.  With 
the  continual  assistance  of  the  Orphan  House  at  Halle,  Denmark  has  m;un- 
tained  (since  1706)  a  mission  for  its  East  Indian  possessions  at  Tranquehar^ 
from  which  also  were  obtAinod  the  first  missionaries  to  the  English  East  In- 
dies and  the  West  India  Islands.  In  the  East  Indies  the  success  has  not  been 
very  great,  and  in  the  West  Indies  it  has  been  confined  wholly  to  the  slaves,  (c) 
8.  In  Lapland  missionaries  had  to  be  continually  sent  and  sustained  from 
Denmark  and  Sweden  to  uphold  Christianity  against  the  severe  exactions  of 
nature,  (d)  4.  Since  the  fifteenth  century  Greenland  (p.  247)  had  been  com- 
pletely lost  sight  of  by  the  nations  of  Europe.  A  Norwegian  minister,  ffan$ 
Eged€^  became  possessed  with  a  strong  desire  to  win  back  this  legendary 
country  to  the  fellowship  of  European  and  Christian  society.     He  finally  sue- 

*)  J.  W.  Witikel,  Casirair  reg.  Graf  zuS«yn-WItt  Vlelefeld.  1S50. 

t)  Abstract  of  tlie  public  acts  in :  Vcrnunftige  n.  ctir.  aber  nicht  scheintaeil  Thomaslsche  Gedanken. 
Hal.  1725.  vol.  III.  p.  209i«.— <?.  F.  KelUr,  d.  Bnttler'sche  Rotte.  (Zeltscb.  t  bist  Th.  1S45.  H.  4.) 

rt)  SpangenXttrg  in  Walcb,  nst  Rel.  Oesch.  vol.  VI IL  p.  SSlMw  Ueberslcbt  d.  Mbslonsgesch.  d. 
ev.  Brudvrk.  Gnad.  ISSa  \J.  lIolmMy  II.  of  Mlsdons  of  the  U.  B.  Lood.  ISIS.  Periodical  Aoooants 
of  the  Ml>»i()ns  of  U.  B.  from  1790.  Lend.  10  voU] 

li\  Eliot^  Chr.  Commonwealtb,  or  the  rising  kingdom  of  J.  Cb.  1652s.  2  v.  4  Mather^  Eoc  IT.  of 
New  Eiigl.  L(>nd.  1702.  f.  [k.  Boston.  1858.  2  voK  %,'\—J.  G.  HuUsr,  d.  yor«»t  v.  grosaen  Oetste  unter 
d.  Indiatiern.  (Stud.  a.  Krit  1S49.  II.  4.)  [Life  of  J.  Bitot,  (Sparks'  Am.  Biogr.)  Boeton.  &  P.  Xmil, 
IL  of  New  Eugl.  Lond.  1747.  2  voK  8.] 

c)  Hall.  Mis-sionsbcricbte  s.  1703  in  vcrscbledener  Geetalt  bis  Jctzt  Waleh,  nst  ReL  Geach.  roL  V. 
p.  U9as.    [Memoirs  of  Chr.  F.  Swartz  &  II.  of  Rel.  in  India.  Lond.  1826.  12.] 

d)  Acta  hl!«t  ccc.  vol.  XI.  p.  1.  XV.  23098.  [J.  SA^srut,  IL  of  Lapland  with  Sketcbea,  Ac  Ozoa 
1674.  t]  Uem,  Lappen  in  Finnmork,  from  the  Diln.  Lpz.  1771.  Budelbaeh  in  Snappy  CbristoCerpe 
1888. 


CHAP.  L    EVANO.  CHURCH  TILL  1760.    §422.  MISSIONS.    QBEENLAND.       511 

oeeded  in  obtaining  the  support  of  the  Danish  government,  and  of  a  commer- 
cial society  (1721).  On  the  western  coast,  the  only  part  accessible,  he  found 
a  country  bound  up  in  ice,  wlicre  a  few  thousand  Esquimaux,  with  no  tra- 
ditions of  the  past,  wrest  from  the  hand  of  nature  the  scantiest  means  of 
subsistence.  Egede  dedicated  Iiimsclf  to  the  work  of  their  improvement  and 
conversion.  Since  that  time  civilization  and  Christianity,  as  far  as  was  pos- 
sible in  such  a  sterile  soil,  has  been  planted  and  maintained  there,  (e)  5.  An 
Institution  was  established  (1728)  by  Prof.  CaUenhurg  of  Halle,  for  the  con- 
version of  the  Jews  and  Mohammedans,  but  as  its  sphere  of  operations  was 
contracted,  the  results  were  of  course  inconsiderable.  (/) 


CHAP.  II.— THE  ROMAN  CATHOLIC  CHURCH  UNTIL  1750. 

§  423.     The  Papacy, 

QuamaeH,  Yltae  et  res  gestae  R.  Pontiff  et  Cardd.  a  Clem.  X.  nsqne  ad  Clem.  XI.  Rom.  175U8. 
S  Tola,  t  Buwer^  Rambach,  vol.  X.  Th.  2.  L,  Ranke^  die  riim.  F&pste.  vol.  III.  p.  SSas.  Rcspecttng 
the  memoirs  of  the  Conclaves :  Ibid.  vol.  III.  p.  346ss. 

When  the  hope  of  once  more  subjecting  the  world  to  the  dominion  of 
Catholicism,  and  the  enthusiasm  which  sprung  from  it  had  passed  away,  the 
papacy  gradually  retired  from  the  prominent  position  it  had  formerly  held  in 
the  afOiirs  of  the  world,  and  assumed  the  station  of  an  Italian  principality. 
And  yet  it  could  not  bring  itself  down  to  a  complete  renunciation  of  the  vast 
claims  which  it  had  once  set  up.    In  civil  affairs  the  political  tendencies  be- 
gan to  predominate  over  the  ecclesiastical.    Hence,  nothing  remdned  for  the 
popes  but  to  enter  their  impotent  protest  in  opposition  to  the  undeniable  and 
necessary  facts  of  history.    As  they  continued  to  urge  the  usual  claims  for 
money  and  jurisdiction  upon  the  states,  which  were  then  rearranging  and 
deciding  upon  their  own  affairs,  they  fell  into  perpetual  conflict  with  the  Cath- 
<^c  princes.    The  states  of  the  Church  inherited  also  the  burden  of  a  debt 
which  had  increased  under  nearly  every  administration.    According  to  the 
selfish  policy  of  the  Conclave,  and  in  consequence  of  the  right  of  exclusion 
always  exercised  by  the  crowns  of  France,  Germany,  Spain,  and  Portugal,  no 
cardinals  could  ordinarily  be  elevated  to  the  papal  chair  except  they  belonged 
to  the  great  Italian  families,  had  grown  gray  in  the  service  of  the  Romish 
prelates,  and  were  not  very  powerful  for  good  or  for  evil.    Such,  indeed,  was 
'vmiformly  the  case,  except  when  the  pious  party  were  sufficiently  strong  to 
<auTy  the  election.    Innocent  JT.  (Pamfili,  1644-55)  was  made  pope  on  the 
ground  that  he  had  never  said  much,  and  had  done  still  less.    He  commenced 


e)  IT  Egedf^  Nachr.  ▼.  d.  GroenL  Miss.  Ilmb.  1740.  \llan%  Eged^y  A  df?9crlp.  of  Greenland  h, 
XJfe  of  the  Author.  Lond.  1818.  8.]  Paul  Eged^,  Nachr.  v.  Or.  a.  e.  Tajrebuch.  v.  1721-40.  Copenh. 
1790.  (Extracts  in  the  Acten  I.  nst  KG.  vol.  III.  p  1.  57?«.)— /?»«fWftrtcA,  H.  Ej?.  Oronl.  Bischof 
CChr.  BIngr.  1S50.  vol.  I.)  [Iceland,  Greenland,  A  the  Faroe  Isle^.  New  Yorlc.  ISSO.  12.]  Kdlbinfft 
Qcaeh.  d.  Mis^  in  Or.  Gnad.  1731.  I).  Auslaod.  ISU.  N.  101  w.  [Miss.  Records  ro^p.  Greenland,  La- 
brador, Ac  (Prea.  Board.)  Phil.  1880.  8.] 

/)  AecooDts  of  the  Institation  till  1791.  St^ph,  SchuU,  Leltangen  dos  IlOcbsten  n.  &  Rath.  a. 
Setaen  d.  Earopa,  Asien.  Atr.  Hal  1771aa.  6  vola. 


512  MODERN  GHUBCH  UISTOBT.    PER.  TL    A.  D.  1MS-I»a 

bis  reign  with  completely  destroying  Roman  agricoltore,  by  granting  to  the 
papal  exchequer  the  entire  monopoly  of  the  trade  in  com,  and  by  his  depend- 
ence upon  Donna  Olympia  gave  occasion  for  the  taunt  that  the  vicar  of  Ohrnt 
was  in  petticoats,  and  that  a  new  Joanna  was  in  possession  of  St.  Peter's 
keys,  (a)  Alexander  VII.  (Chigi,  1655-67)  lived  to  ei^oy  the  triumph  of 
welcoming  the  accomplished  daughter  of  Gustavus  Adolphus  to  the  Otpi- 
tol.  This  extraordinary  woman  had  become  tired  of  Protestantism  and 
of  the  Swedish  crown,  and  had  resigned  them  both,  that  she  might  inde- 
])endently  enjoy  the  glories  of  art  and  science  in  the  midst  of  the  natural  Inx- 
nriance  of  a  southern  clime.  Though  of  a  masculine  temperament,  she  still 
loved  A  system  of  faith  which  made  a  merit  of  celibacy,  and  while  she 
spurned  all  restraints  upon  thought,  she  nevertheless  felt  the  need  of  a  present 
infalliblo  autlu)rity.  Hence,  wliile  she  humbled  herself  to  embrace  with  full 
confidence  the  abstract  notion  of  the  papacy,  her  imperious  disposition  and 
her  keen  wit  came  not  unfreqnently  into  collision  with  the  actual  pope.  The 
negotiations  of  the  papal  court  with  Louis  XIV.  respecting  portions  of  terri- 
tory belonging  to  Parma  and  Modena,  the  royal  prerogative  of  appointing  the 
superior  ecclesiastical  officers  in  the  newly  acquired  provinces,  and  the  iosolt 
to  the  dignity  of  the  French  ambassador  at  Rome,  were  terminated  of  course 
in  the  humiliation  of  the  pope  by  the  treaty  of  Pisa  (1664),  since  the  king 
was  already  in  possession  of  Avignon,  and  threatened  to  advance  upon  Rome 
itself.  During  his  pontificate  he  lost  the  reputation  of  a  saint,  but  acquired 
that  of  a  poet,  and  was  regarded  by  the  Roman  people  as  a  great  man  in  lit- 
tle things,  but  a  little  man  in  great  things.  While  the  Jesuits  attempted  to 
prove  that  the  pope  was  infallible,  even  in  matters  of  &ct,  the  Florentine  am- 
bassador decided  that  a  true  word  never  passed  his  lips,  (h)  Clement  IX. 
(Rospigliosi,  1667-69)  filled  once  more  the  important  position  of  a  mediator 
between  the  ecclesiastical  and  the  civil  powers.  He  endeared  himself  to  the 
people  by  the  mildness  of  his  disposition,  but  the  afiEairs  of  government  went 
on  as  they  best  might,  without  his  direction.  Clement  X.  (Altieri,  1670-76), 
a  feeble  octogenarian,  was  saluted  pope  by  all  parties,  as  if  by  inspiration, 
after  a  long  struggle,  but  did  nothing  except  to  weep  over  the  administration 
of  his  family  favorites.  Innocent  XL  (Odeschalchi,  1676-89)  adopted  vigor- 
ous measures  for  the  restoration  of  strict  morals  both  in  Church  and  state, 
lie  endeavored  to  relieve  the  finances,  but  seemed  to  think  that  nothing  was 
needful  but  to  save  as  much  as  possible.  A  few  iMshops  in  France  had  re- 
sisted the  royai  claim  to  administer  the  revenues  of  ev^  those  churohes 
which  had  not  been  founded  by  the  crown  during  a  vacancy  in  the  diocese 
to  which  they  belonged,  and  to  appoint  persons  to  the  livings  dependent  upon 
such  vacant  bishoprics.    The  pope  gave  his  countenance  to  their  a{^>eaL 

a)  RMHmuchtr,  a  Inn.  X.  Vit  1674.  4  Oualdi  {LsUy,  Vlte  delU  D.  OlTmpU  MaMtghtni 
Without  place.  1666. 12.  tL  \.  Rlcheru^  Lps.  17SS,  but  not  to  be  depended  apon. 

h)  Philomati  Ubores  Javenilea.  Par.  1666.  t—Oo%rinff,  U.  elect.  AL  nimst  16&7. 4.  (Opp.  vol.  V.) 
—ArkenAoU,  M£m.  concern.  Christine  B.  de  Bodde.  Amst  1761&  4  v.  4»  &.  y.  ihifiMii,  Lpi^ 
1758as.  4  vola.  4.  Grau^ri,  Chr.  u.  ihr.  Hof.  Bonn.  1887i.  9  toU.— Relation  de  tout  oe  qnl  ae  paaw  •■• 
tre  le  P.  Al.  et  le  Roi  dc  France.  CoL  1670. 12.  Dwrnarais^  H.  des  d^melsz  de  la  eoar  de  FriMe 
avec  la  oour  de  Rome.  Par.  1706.  4.  iLeti)  II  alndlcato  dl  AL  eon  U  ano  Tlaggio  neU*  altro  mcodo^ 
Ocn.  1668.  12. 


CHAP.  IL    CATHOLIC  CHURCH  TILL  1750.    $428.  POPKS.  513 

Louis  XIY.  took  possession  of  Avignon,  and  threatened  to  sander  all  connec- 
tion between  France  and  the  Roman  See.     Innocent  refused  to  grant  canoni- 
cal confirmation  to  all  those  bishops  who  had  been  appointed  by  the  king. 
That  he  might  be  master  of  his  own  city,  and  restore  the  administration  of 
justice,  he  abolished  the  privilege  which  ambassadors  had  sometimes  exer- 
cised, of  making  their  quarters  at  Rome  an  asylum  (la  francliise).     On  this 
the  French  ambassador,  whose  retinue  was  equal  to  an  army,  abused  both  the 
ecclesiastical  and  the  sovereign  rights  of  the  pope.    Innocent  'died  without 
being  moved  from  his  purposes,  hated  by  the  great  and  by  the  Jesuits,  cursed 
by  the  people  as  a  miser,  and  yet  revered  as  a  saint,  (c)    Alexander  VIIL 
(Ottoboni,  1689-91),  who  was  elected  through  French  influence,  re-established 
the  whole  system  of  nepotism  and  simony,  supported  his  native  city  of  Venice 
in  its  war  against  the  Turks,  and  obtained  by  the  favor  of  France  the  aboli- 
tion of  the  freedom  of  its  ambassador's  quarters,  but  he  could  come  to  no 
agreement  respecting  the  royal  prerogative  in  the  French  Church.     Innocent 
XIL  (Pignatel)i,  1691-1700)  took  the  predecessor  whose  name  he  bore,  for 
his  model,  and  endeavored  to  secure  by  laws  the  whole  succeeding  century 
against  nepotism  and  simony.    His  nepotes  were  the  poor,  and  the  Lateran 
was  his  hospital.    His  efforts  for  the  restoration  of  Church  diMicipline  ex- 
tended to  80  high,  and  yet  to  such  minute  subjects,  that  some  scoffers  boaste<l 
that  he  had  reformed  the  Church  in  its  head  and  members.    In  the  peace 
which  he  concluded  with  France  the  king  kept  possession  of  the  royal  prero- 
gative he  had  previously  claimed.     Clement  XI.  (Albani,  1700-21),  an  inde- 
pendent prince  and  a  zealous  pathetic  preacher,  endeavored  without  success, 
in  the  complicated  mazes  of  the  war  of  succession,  to  obtain  by  spiritual  or 
carnal  weapons  some  share  in  the  inheritance.    His  protest  against  the  as- 
sumption of  the  crown  by  the  Elector  of  Brandenburg,  w:is  regarded  in  Ger- 
many as  a  papal  extravagance.    When  the  aversion  of  the  bishops  to  the  pre- 
rogatives of  the  Sicilian  monarcliy  had  come  to  an  open  rupture,  the  pope 
imagined  that  he  could  destroy  the  ecclesiastical  sovereignty  of  the  crown  by 
Interdictfi.    But  the  only  effect  which  they  produced  was  that  ho  was  obliged 
to  support  at  Rome  the  three  thousand  clergymen  who  were  expelled  from 
the  Two  Sicilies  for  their  observance  of  the  interdict.  {J)    Innocent  XIII, 
(Ck>Dti,  1721-24),  a  kind  prince  and  a  conscientious  bishop,  on  the  pledge  that 
he  should  receive  the  palfrey  and  the  feudal  quitrents,  invested  the  emperor 
with  the  sovereignty  of  Naples,  vainly  protested  against  the  bestowal  of 
Parma  and  Piacenza  as  imperial  fiefs,  and  from  respect  to  Franco  was  obliged 
to  appoint  a  contemptible  wretch  to  the  cardinalship.     Benedict  XIII,  (Orsini, 
1724-30),  who  could  be  induced  to  accept  of  the  papal  office  only  by  a  regard 
to  his  monnstic  vow  of  obedience,  seemed  always  to  have  regarded  the  con- 
vent of  the  Dominicans  as  bis  world,  while  his  hypocritical  favorite,  Coscia, 
bartered  away  both  Church  and  state,  until  primitive  Christian  simplicity  be- 


c)  ViU  d'lnn.  XL  Yen.  1690.  4.  Bonamici,  de  Titi»  et  rebus  gesUs  Inn.  XL  Kom.  1776.  L*eUit 
dn  d^  de  Rome.  CoL  1767. 

a)  Oppc  (Bulla,  Dlscoarsefl,  Letton)  Ro*n.  1722.  FrcC  1729.  2  toI&  t-^Suder,  Leben  u.  Thaten  d. 
khigen  a.  iMnUiinten  CI.  XI.  FrkC  1721.  8  vola.  (P.  PoUdoro)  L.  YL  de  vitA  et  rebua  ge&tis  CL  XL 
Urb.  1727.  4   BtbouM,  H.  de  CI.  XL  Avlgn.  1752.  2  to1&  4 

83 


5 1 4  MODERN  CnUBCH  HISTOBY.    PEB.  TL    A.  D.  1$48-180& 

came  utterly  ridicnlons  in  a  court  so  recklessly  conformed  to  the  world.  A 
peace  was  concluded  with  Naples,  by  which  it  was  stipulated  that  the  Sicilian 
monarchy  should  be  recognized,  but  that  important  cases  of  dispensation 
should  be  reserved  for  the  Roman  Ouria.  (e)  Clement  XII,  (Corsini,  1780-iO), 
who,  after  a  brilliant  career  was  raised  to  the  throne  when  old  and  blind,  was 
the  patron  of  justice,  art,  and  literature,  as  far  as  he  could  be  so  through  his 
family  favoqtes.  He  secretly  favored  the  conquest  of  Naples  for  a  Spanish 
prince.  (/)  Benedict  XIV,  (Lambertini,  1740-68),  a  learned,  well  meaning, 
and  facetious  master,  but  averse  to  public  affairs,  set  an  example  to  his  people 
of  noble  yet  simple  manners.  As  an  author  ho  diminished  the  number  of  the 
saints  of  the  Romish  Church,  as  a  pope  he  abolished  many  of  their  festivals, 
and  lived  in  harmony  with  the  great  heretical  king,  (^)  and  endeavored  to 
preserve  the  dignity  of  the  Roman  court  by  judicious  concessions  to  the  Cath- 
olic princes,  that  they  might  not  become  unwilling  to  present  their  petitions 
there,  (h) 

• 

§424.     The  OaUiean  Church. 

iPtcot)  Easal  hist  sar  rinflaenoe  de  U  rel  en  France  pendant  le  17.  8.  Par.  18S4.  8  Tola,  tmnlatad 
as  Denkwurdigkeiten  d.  franz.  K.  by  Rdu  dc  WeU,  Frnkt  1828i.  9  Tola. 

In  France  all  the  splendors  of  an  absolute  monarchy  were  developed  under 
Louis  XIV,  (1648-1716),  in  the  midst  of  a  wealthy  and  intellectual  nation, 
which  found  consolation  for  its  secret  wounds  in  the  gratification  of  its  vanity 
and  frivolity.  During  the  contest  with  Innocent  XI.  the  king  convoked  an 
assembly  of  bishops  and  barons  at  Paris  (1682),  in  which  the  legal  views 
which  ordinarily  prevailed  in  France  were  formally  pronounced.  It  was  there 
maintained :  1.  That  Peter  and  his  successors  have  received  power  from  God 
in  spiritual,  but  not  in  secular  affairs.  2.  That  this  power  is  limited,  not  only 
by  the  decrees  of  the  Council  of  Constance  relating  to  the  authority  of  €ren- 
eral  Councils,  but,  3.  By  the  established  prescriptions  and  usages  of  the  GhJ- 
lican  Church ;  and,  4.  That  the  decisions  of  the  pope,  when  not  sustained  by 
the  authority  of  the  Church,  are  not  infallible.  These  propositions  of  the 
Gallican  clergy  were  proclaimed  by  a  royal  ordinance,  to  which  all  the  instruo- 
tions  of  the  schools  were  to  be  conformed,  but  in  Rome  they  were  pnblidy 
burned  by  the  common  hangman.  The  whole  power  of  the  pope  was  founded 
on  the  opinion  that  no  bishop  elect  could  be  consecrated  without  the  papal 
sanction.  All  newly  elected  bishops  were  therefore  very  zealous  for  the  re- 
conciliation which  was  soon  effected  with  Innocent  XII.  by  the  revocation 
of  the  four  propositions.  Public  opinion,  however,  in  France,  has  never 
drawn  back  from  the  positions  assumed  in  them,  (a)    The  prelates  appointed 

e)  0pp.  theol.  Rom.  1723.  8  vols.  C— Icona  et  mentis  et  cordis  Ben.  XIII.  Fret  1725.  Leben.  o. 
Tbaten  Ben.  XIII.  Frkf.  1781.    AIm.  Borgia^  Ben.  XIIL  vita.  Uom.  17&i.  4. 

/)  Acta  hIsL  ecc.  voL  IV.  p.  1008ra. 

g)  Aug.  Thfiner,  Zustinde  d.  katb.  K.  in  Scbleslen.  1740-63.  a.  d.  Archive  d.  h.  Stohls.  Batiib. 
1892.  2  vols. 

h)  Opf).  cd.  Aztvtdo^  Rom.  17i7s8.  13  vols.  4.— Acta  hist,  ecc  vol.  IV.  p.  106Sb.«.  Tie  dn  P.  Bta. 
XIV.  Par.  1788. 12.    Hist  poL  BL  1858.  vol.  81.  H.  & 

a)  K  du  Pin^  de  pot.  ecc  et  temp.  a.  dedaratio  cleri  galL  den.  rep.  Vind.  1778.  A.  Mo^.  ITSa  4  So*- 
9uet^  Defensio  declaratlonls.  Lux.  (Qen.)  178a  2  toU  4  A  oft  In  bis  Oeavresl886.  voU  IX  Aium- 


CHAP.  IL    CATHOLIC  CHURCH  TILL  ITtM.    $424  FRANCE.    LOUIS  XIY.      515 

according  to  the  vacillating  policy  of  the  king  and  his  favorites,  formed  a 
spiritual  nobility  in  the  conrt  so  completely  submissive  that  even  their  liberal 
position  with  respect  to  Rome  depended  entirely  upon  the  royal  will.  Bat 
when  secalar  literature  became  flourishing  and  subjected  the  intellect  of  Eu- 
rope to  its  sway,  the  consequences  of  the  restoration  of  Catholicism  entirely 
disappeared,  and  many  learned,  profound,  and  brilliant  writers  were  produced 
within  the  Church  itself.  As  the  great  historical  works  published  by  the 
monks  of  St  Maur  and  in  the  Oratory  at  Rome,  were  generally  undertaken  in 
an  ecclesiastical  spirit,  and  without  a  wish  to  sacrifice  their  learned  leisure  to 
the  prejudices  of  an  inquisitorial  tribunal,  they  seldom,  and  never  intentionally, 
contained  any  tiling  displeasing  to  the  hierarchy.  Fetavius  (d.  1652)  com- 
posed his  work  on  the  history  of  doctrines  (p.  6,  nt.  c.)  with  the  hatred  to 
heretics  which  is  peculiar  to  the  Jesuits,  but  the  power  of  Catholicism  derives 
very  little  support  from  the  medley  of  opinions  he  has  brought  together  from 
the  ancient  Church.  Peter  de  Marca^  Archbishop  of  Paris  (d.  1662),  attempted 
to  justify  the  liberties  of  the  Gallican  Church  by  examples  derived  from  past 
ages  (p.  6,  nt.  J).  Mdbillon  (d.  1707)  wrote  against  the  impudence  with  which 
the  bodies  taken  from  the  catacombs  were  honored  and  sold  at  Rome  for 
relics,  (ft)  France  was  so  much  beloved  by  this  man  of  documents  that  even 
the  prayers  of  the  hierarchy  could  only  prevail  upon  him  slightly  to  mitigate 
the  form  of  his  expressions.  Huet  (d.  1721),  at  one  time  Bishop  of  Avranches, 
tttemptod  to  prove  the  truth  of  Christianity  by  pointing  out  vestiges  of  it  in 
all  antiquity,  and  the  uncertainty  of  all  human  knowledge^  («)  Richard  Si- 
mon (d.  1712),  with  a  bold  and  subtle  learning,  ventured  beyond  the  views 
then  commonly  entertained  respecting  the  origin,  preservation,  and  interpre- 
tation of  the  sacred  Scriptures.  He  forsook  the  Oratory  of  his  own  accord, 
▼as  violently  assailed  by  the  Protestants,  and  although  he  could  not  survive 
the  loss,  he  burned  his  manuscripts  on  account  of  the  displeasure  of  his  con- 
temporaries, and  for  fear  of  the  Jesuits,  (d)  Salignac  de  la  Motte  Fenelan^ 
the  swan  of  Cambray  (d.  1715),  apostolical  in  his  spirit,  intellectual,  and 
guided  only  by  the  impulses  of  his  own  affectionate  heart,  described  an  edu- 
cation conformed  to  man^s  nature,  in  contrast  with  the  mode  of  training  pur- 
sued by  the  Jesuits,  (r)  Bosnuet  (d.  1704),  the  eagle  of  Meaux,  made  conces- 
lions  to  the  conrt  and  to  the  world  without  injury  to  his  own  dignity  or  to 
his  Chnrch.  In  the  service  of  the  king  he  defended  the  freedom  of  tlie  Gal- 
lican Church,  and  for  the  advantage  of  the  pope  he  attacked  the  Protestants. 
His  attractive  representation  of  Catholicism  was  made  to  show  that  the  lat- 
ter had  abandoned  the  Church  only  because  they  were  ignorant  of  its  true 
ebariicter.     Language  was  subject  to  his  control  as  if  he  were  its  king,  his 


garUn,  x.  d.  Freih.  d.  galL  K.  Ilal  1752.  Origoire^  Essal  lilsL  Bar  1m  liberies  de  Pegl.  gallicane. 
Par.  1817. 

h)  JSuM0fdi  Romani  Efx  de  cultii  Sanctorum  Ignotor.  Par.  16SS.  4  ed.  8l  1705.  A,  Both  In  Oav- 
ragee  poathamee.  P«r.  1724.  tol.  I.  p.  209a9. 

e)  ITutUi  Cotnroentar.  de  rcbos  ad  eum  pertinent  Amst  1718.  12. 

d)  H.  crlt.  do.  V.  T.  (Par.  167a  4)  Kot  16^55.  4.  II.  criL  dii  N.  T.  Rott  1«89.  4— Life  prefaced  to 
LeUrea  cholsiea  de  M.  Simon  par  de  la  Martini  re,  Amst  1780.  4  vote.  12.  K.  IT.  Oraf,  CL  B.  8. 
(BHtrr.  zu  d.  Th.  Wisfl.  Jena  1851.  vol.  I.) 

d)  Oeuv.  Splritnellea.  Antr.  1718.  2  ▼.  dc  often.  Oorrespondanee  de  Thn,  Par.  1827.  8  yola.— iZam- 
•iiy,  H.  de  Feu.  Hay.  1728. 11  OobL  1821    1>€  Beauuet^  H.  de  F^n.  Par.  1809. 8  Tola. 


516  MODEBN  OHUBCH  HISTOBT.    PSR.  YL    A.  D.  164S-1858L 

eloqnence  was  lofty,  ingenious,  on  difficult  snbjeots  sometimes  wonderfully 
fine,  and  in  consequence  of  a  strain  of  sadness  which  prevails  in  it,  generally 
pathetic.  (/)  The  pulpit  orators  contemporary  with  him  were :  Fleehier^ 
Bishop  of  Nisraes  (d.  1710),  whose  cool  considerateness  made  every  exalted 
thing  on  earth  bow  to  the  doctrine  of  the  cross ;  the  Jesuit,  BovrdaUme 
(d.  1704),  whose  discourses,  with  no  brilliant  passages,  and  with  no  effort  to 
obtain  applause,  move  all  hearts  by  their  vigorous  beauty ;  Ma$sillon,  Bishop 
of  Clermont  (d.  1742),  who,  while  revealing  in  the  noblest  language  of  an 
aooomplishod  education,  the  secrets  of  the  human  heart,  the  captivating  mid- 
dle path  between  the  extremes  of  good  and  evil,  and  the  intricacies  of  daily 
life,  made  virtue  seem  attractive,  and  even  the  king  dissatisfied  with  himself; 
and  finally  the  missionary,  Bridaine  (about  1750),  who,  with  popular  vigor  as 
a  messenger  of  God,  gave  utterance  to  the  thunders  of  the  eternal  world,  {g) 

Jansenism. 

Leydecker^  H.  Jansenlsmi.  Tn^.  ad  Rh.  1695.  {Gtrheron)  H.  g6n6rale  de  Jana.  Amst  1700.  lu- 
ehe^ini,  H.  polem.  Jana.  Rom.  1711.  8  vols.  Abr6ff6  hist  des  d^tuurs  et  des  TariaL  da  J»ur\  With- 
out place.  1789.  4.  Dotn.  de  Colonia,  Diction,  des  livres  Jansenlstes.  Lyon.  1752.  4  toIh  1ft.  [Art 
in  Kitto'5  Journal  of  Blbl  Lit.  vol.  YII.] 

§425.     /.  Port-Royal. 

Fontaine,  Mem.  pour  servir  4  TH.  de  P.  R.  Col.  (U tr.)  1TS8.  2  vols.  12.  J.  RaeifU^  H.  d.  P.  R. 
Par.  1767.  2  vols.  More  complete  in  bis  Oeuvr.  Par.  1799.  4  vols.  Relation  de  la  palx  de  Tegl  soo*. 
CI  IX.  avec  des  lettrcs,  nctee  etc.  1706.  2  vols.  (Quesnoll)  La  i*aix  de  CI.  IX.  Brux.  170L  2  vols.  12. 
H.  Reuchlin,  Oesch.  v.  P.  R.  Hmb.  1389-44.  2  v.  C.  A.  Sitinte  Beuw,  P.  R.  Par.  1810-2L  2  vols. 
[Rol.  Mag.  vol.  &  p.  869.    Art  in  Meth.  Quart  Rev.  April.  ISSa  p.  191-212] 

A  controversy  which  had  for  some  time  been  slumbering,  was  revived  by 
Jansenius,  a  deceased  Bishop  of  Ypres.  His  work,  which  together  with  his 
testament  was  edited  by  a  friend,  (a)  contained  an  exact  representation  of  the 
Augustinian  and  Pelagian  systems  of  doctrine,  from  which  it  appeared  that 
many  of  the  scholastic  writers  and  popes  approached  much  nearer  the  heretic 
than  the  saint.  To  the  system  of  external  accommodation  which  so  exten- 
sively prevailed  in  the  ethical  system  of  the  Jesuits,  was  here  opposed  the 
cordial  sincerity  of  a  spirit  wrought  by  God,  which,  being  freed  by  grace 
from  the  power  of  concupiscence,  and  implanted  in  the  soil  of  divine  love, 
cannot  sin,  and  finds  its  freedom  in  the  service  of  God.  The  Jesuits  attacked 
the  book  as  soon  as  it  appeared,  and  Urban  VIIL  directed  against  it  the  bull 
In  eminenti  (1642).  The  University  of  Louvain,  however,  in  behalf  of  the 
Netherlandic  clergy  suggested  the  inquiry,  whether  the  pope  oondenmed  the 
rejected  propositions  as  the  propositions  of  Jansen  or  of  Augustine?    When 


/)  Ocuv.  Von.  178688.  5  vols.  4.  Par.  1744.4  vols.  £  Oeuv.  posth.  Amst  (Par.)  176&  8  rotai  4  Ocnv. 
oompl.  Par.  1886.  12  vols.  4.—De  Beausset,  H.  de  Bom.  Par.  1814.  4  voI&  7^i&aro«uf,  Snppltei.  aax 
H.  do  Boss,  et  de  F^n.  Par.  1S22.  A.  Oaillo*,  Vie  de  Boas.  Par.  1886.  Respecting  his  allcced  mar- 
riage :  (  WeU)  Katbolik.  1827  P.  6  N.  1.  A.  K.  Z.  1S27.  N.  8&  [A  work  bj  M.  Floquet  on  the  Lift 
dc  Writings  of  Bossuet  is  announced  in  Paris  in  1854,  and  is  said  to  contain  important  diacoreriea] 

Q)  Mauri/,  Essai  sur  I'eioquence  de  la  cbaire.  Par.  1810.  vol  I.    Lit  hist  will  be  found  in  Am- 
num,  Handb.  d.  Kanzulberedts.  N&rnb.  1S12.  p.  48a.    Examples:  Musterpred.  fhuix.  Kanzelredatr-. 
fibers.  V.  LIncke,  m.  Torr.  v.  KrehL  Meiss.  1S88. 

a)  Angustinus  s.  doctrina  Aug.  do  humanae  naturae  sanitate,  aegrltodlne  et  medldaa  adr.  Pelts 
et  MaaRillensen  Lev.  IMO.  t  A  often. 


CHAP.  II.    CATHOLIC  CHURCH  TILL  1750.    §426.  PORT-EOYAL.  517 

the  goveniment  had  decided  in  favor  of  the  bull  (1647)  it  was  generally  re- 
ceived in  all  parts  of  Belgiam.  In  France,  the  Abbot  of  St,  Cyran  (d.  1643) 
the  early  friend  of  Jansen,  a  John  in  the  prison  of  Richelien,  and  with  a 
higher  ambition  than  that  ancient  preacher,  had  already  collected  a  bond  of 
yonthM  disciples,  whose  enthusiasm  for  the  liberty  of  the  Church  had  been 
excited  by  a  severe  doctrine  and  discipline,  (h)  Anthony  Arnault!  (d.  1694), 
the  shrewd  and  profound  Doctor  of  the  Sorbonne,  with  an  hereditary  hatred 
of  the  Jesuits,  took  his  stand  in  favor  of  Augustine,  (c)  With  him  stood, 
after  a  brief  struggle  in  youth,  his  sister  Angelica^  the  Abbess  of  the  Cister- 
cian convent  of  Port-Royal^  and  a  convent-mother,  whose  gentle  spirit  was 
pervaded  by  the  most  thorough  earnestness  of  monastic  life,  {d)  Engaged  iti  the 
same  cause  was  also  a  community  of  highly  educated  men,  who  lived  in  the 
manner  of  the  ancient  anachorets  in  the  vicinity  of  Port-Royal  des  Champs, 
Innocent  X,  condemned  five  propositions  taken  from  the  work  of  Janscn 
(1653).  Amauld^s  friends  explained  that  the  five  propositions  were  not  in- 
tended by  the  author  to  be  understood  in  the  sense  in  which  they  were  con- 
demned by  the  pope.  But  Alexander  VII,  assured  the  world  (1656)  that 
they  were  actually  condemned  in  the  sense  intended  by  Jansen.  The  party 
at  Port-Royal  and  four  bishops  objected  that  this  was  a  simple  question  re- 
specting an  historical  fact  (la  question  dn  fait),  on  which  the  Church  could  de- 
dde  with  no  higher  authority  than  science.  This  revival  of  Augustinism 
originated  in  the  same  spirit  which  had  induced  the  Reformers  to  revive  it,  a 
deep  religious  earnestness  in  opposition  to  the  extreme  levity  which  prevailed 
in  the  Church.  The  general  ^^ty  of  seeking  edification  in  the  perusal  of  the 
sacred  Scriptures  was  defended,  and  the  absolute  recognition  of  the  sove- 
reignty of  God  was  a  shield  against  the  absolute  authority  of  the  papacy  and 
the  monarchy.  But  the  Port-Royalists  denied  that  there  was  any  such  affin- 
ity between  themselves  and  the  reformers,  and  entered  with  peculiar  zeal  into 
the  conflict  with  Calvinism.  They  also  acknowledged  that  the  principle  of 
all  good  works  must  lie  in  a  pious  disposition,  («)  and  yet  they  were  models 
of  the  severest  penances  and  self-denials.  Their  devotional  books,  written  in 
the  purest  style  of  the  most  accomplished  French  authors,  very  soon  took  the 
place  of  the  Jesuitical  literature.  Pascal  (1623-62),  an  eminent  mathemati- 
cian even  in  early  youth,  had  his  religious  spirit  awakened  during  a  dangerous 
illness,  and  in  the  midst  of  continual  debility,  to  consider  the  natural  condi- 
tion of  the  Christian.  In  opposition  to  a  sceptical  world,  and  in  brilliant 
fashes  of  thought,  he  proved  from  the  very  contradictions  of  men  the  neces- 
sity and  truth  of  Christianity  as  a  restoration  of  religion  to  those  who  longed 
to  know  the  divine  will.  By  the  enthusiasm  and  wit  of  his  Letter-*,  the  ori- 
^n  of  which  was  then  so  mysterious,  but  exhibited  a  perfect  sympathy  with 
the  Port-Royalists,  the  public  mind  was  completely  carried  against  the  lax 
piety  and  licentious  confessional  morality  of  the  Jesuits,  (/)  although  these 

5)  OeoTTM  ehretiennes  et  splrltaelles.  Lyon.  1679.  4  vols.  lA. 

r)  Oearres  d^Arnaald,  Laos.  1778.  48  vols.  4    After  Lanjuinaia  dtades  biogr.  (Par.  1828.)    £r«M> 
MrM,  in  the  Kllbt  Archiv.  1824.  vol.  IL  P.  1. 

d)  Eotretlens  on  conferencca  de  la  mere  Angi'liqae.  Brax.  1757. 12. 

e)  A.  Amauld,  de  la  frC'quente  communion.  Par.  1643.  A  often. 

/)  Penadeo.  Par.  1669.  1&  A  often.  Brl  1886.  transL  into  Oerin.  {bj  Kleaker)  Brem.  1777,  by  Blecb. 


518  MODEBN  CHURCH  HISTOBT.    P£B.  YL    A.  D.  1648-1898. 

were  the  representatives  of  worldly  interests^  and  in  some  respects  of  eyen 
sonnd  common  sense,  (g)  Clement  IX,  gave  the  Jansenists  an  oi^rtonitj, 
by  means  of  certain  equivocal  expressions,  to  reconcile  thdr  convictions  with 
the  papal  will  (1669).  Innocent  XL  was  at  heart  not  very  far  from  them. 
But  Clement  XI,  and  LauU  XIV,  were  determined  upon  their  extermination. 
Most  of  them  fled  to  the  Netherlands,  Port-Royal  was  abolished,  and  so  com- 
pletely destroyed  that  even  the  graves  were  rifled  of  their  contents.  (A) 

§  426.    II.  The  Constitution  Unigenitns. 

AcU  Const  Unlg.  od.  J^aff,  Tab.  1T21.  4.  CoL  novA  Actt  Const  U.  ed.  DubaU^  Lagd.  B.  ITSSi 
4.— Anecdotes  s^cr^tes  de  1a  Const  U.  UtnJ.  178S.  8  toIb.  Magd.  and  Lps.  ITSSra.  6  y.  La  Const  U. 
d^fjr^  a  I'egl.  unlv.  CoL  1T09.  4  yoI&  [Papae  Clemantia  XL  ikoMalsstnDa  Bulla  sle  dkta  Un%.  4c 
Bom.  1718.] 

The  illustrations  of  the  New  Testament  publi^ed  by  Faschasins  QyetneU 
(d.  1719),  a  Jansenist  who  had  been  expelled  from  the  Oratory,  was  a  book 
much  beloved  by  the  people,  and  recommended  by  many  high  anthorifies  of 
the  Church  for  devotional  uses,  (a)  But  the  Jesuits  deemed  it  of  great  im- 
portance for  the  overthrow  of  Jansenism  that  this  book  should  be  con- 
demned. The  same  thing  was  also  demanded  by  I^duU  XlV.y  and  Clement 
XI,  was  finally  induced  to  condemn,  by  the  Constitution  Unigenitvi  (171 8X 
101  propositions  taken  from  Quesnell's  New  Testament  as  heretical,  danger- 
ous, or  offensive  to  pious  ears.  Among  these  were  many  doctrines  of  the 
fathers,  and  even  of  the  Scriptures,  but  which  were  capable  of  a  Jansenist 
explanation.  Hence  a  large  portion  of  the  ^ench  clergy  and  people,  with 
the  Archbishop  of  Paris,  the  Cardinal  de  Koaille*  at  their  head,  pnbhcly 
resisted  the  Constitution.  The  king  commenced  the  work  of  exeenting  it  by 
force,  and  died,  not  without  some  misgivings  that  he  might  have  gone  too  &r 
in  this  matter.  Under  the  regency  of  Orleans,  who  cared  no  more  for  the 
pope  than  he  did  for  Christ  himself,  many  bishops,  in  opposition  to  the  papal 
enactment,  appealed  to  a  future  council.  But  as  the  minister  Dubois  was 
anxious  to  attain  the  dignity  of  Cardinal,  the  regency  decided  (after  1719) 
against  the  appellants,  and  when  Louis  XV.  undertook  the  government  under 
the  Cardinal  A.  ff,  Fleury^  those  who  had  made  the  appeal  were  compelled 
by  depositions,  imprisonmenta,  and  banishments,  to  withdraw  it,  and  the 
Constitution  was  by  an*  act  of  royal  sovereignty  enforoed  as  a  law  of  the 
kingdom  (1730).  The  last  attempt  in  behalf  of  Jansenism  was  by  means  of 
miracles  and  wild  convulsions  at  the  grave  of  a  popular  saint,  Francis  of 


with  PrcC  hj  Neander.  Berl.  1S40.  Pens^es  (hi  their  orig:  form),  ft-a^ments  et  lettrea  pnM.  y.  Prot]^ 
FauQ  r^  Par.  1S44  2  vola.  Lee  ProTfndales.  Par.  165da.  4.  A  often.  Lraigt».  1774.  8  ▼.  OeiiTres. 
Hay.  1779.  D^Jon.  18d&  2  rola.  [Paacal^s  Tboogbts  on  Bel.  ed.  by  Bickersteth.  Lond.  1947.  8.  New 
Turk,  &  ProvlDcIal  Letters.  Edinb.  1347.  New  York  &  PhUad.  1»»7.}>-La  vie  de  P.  pw  sa  soesr 
Mad  Perler.  (Prefixed  to  Pensoes.  Amst.  16S4.  &  often.)  Boswt,  Discoare  sur  U  vie  ot  lea  otivr.  do 
P.  (Oeuv.  do  P.  1779. 1819.)  ZZ  ReucJdin,  P.  Leben  u.  Geist  sr.  Bchrr.  Stottfr.  1S40.  Bbrdm  J>e- 
mmdin,  Elogo  de  P.  Par.  1S43.  Neander  in  Wiss.  Abt>h.  Bri.  1S51.  p,  748a.  J.  MuOUr  is  d.  D- 
Zeltach.  f.  chr.  Wisa.  1853.  N.  80.    [Art  in  Kitto'a  Joara.  of  Bibl.  Lit  vol  IILJ 

g)  Duman^  II.  dea  cinq.  pro(ioa&  do  Jans.  Lidge.  1899.  2  toIi. 

h)  Mem.  sar  la  dc^stniction  de  P.  R.  dee  Champs.  1711.    Origaire,  loa  mines  de  P.  &  Fv.  1809. 

a)  Partially  publ.  after  1671,  bat  the  whole  tssned:  Le  Nonv.  Teat  en  Francois  arec  dea  rilUc- 
tiona  moralea.  Par.  1637.  2  toIbw  12.  and  often. 


CHAP.il    catholic  GHUBCH  till  1750.    S  420.  JANSENISM.  519 

Paris^  who  had  died  with  the  appeal  in  his  hand  (1727).  Strange  things 
were  related,  which  made  a  deep  impression  upon  even  unhelievers,  hnt  the 
miracles  found  a  grave  in  the  dungeons  which  the  government  provided  for 
those  who  asserted  then),  {h)  Beaumont^  Archhishop  of  Paris,  gave  orders 
that  all  dying  persons  who  could  not  prove  in  their  certificate  of  confession 
that  they  had  accepted  of  the  Constitution,  should  he  denied  the  sacrament, 
and  it  was  accordingly  refused  to  the  Duke  of  Orleans.  The  archhishop  was 
summoned  to  answer  for  this  act  at  the  har  of  the  Parliament  of  Paris  (1762). 
All  interference  in  spiritual  affairs  on  the  part  of  that  hody  was  then  forhid- 
den  hy  the  king.  The  Parliament  appealed  to  their  oatb,  which  hound  them 
to  assist  every  citizen  in  the  maintenance  of  his  rights.  A  peace  was  finally 
mediated  hy  means  of  a  mild  pastoral  letter  from  Benedict  XIV,  (1756).  (e) 
Jansenism  has  however  suhsequently  propagated  itself  in  throe  different 
forms.  In  the  Netherlands  it  has  a  peculiar  form  of  ecclesiastical  govern- 
ment, with  no  connection  with  the  Roman  Church,  hut  with  the  Archbishop 
of  Utrecht  presiding  over  the  two  Bishops  of  Harlem  and  De venter,  (d)  The 
mystical  element  has  been  continued  among  a  few  enthusiasts  (Convulsion- 
naires),  who,  having  elevated  their  feelings  to  a  high  degree  of  spasmodic 
exhilaration  by  a  certain  amount  of  corporeal  abuses,  wounds  and  crucifix- 
ions, pour  forth  predictions  of  the  overthrow  of  the  throne  and  of  the 
Church.  («)  The  liberal  element  in  the  form  of  a  theological  spirit  has  ex- 
tensively prevailed  among  a  large  portion  of  the  clergy  in  France,  Germany, 
and  Italy. 

§  427.     MyHiciim^  Quietism^  and  Pi&ys  Humor. 

Antoinette  Bourignon  (d.  1680)  of  Ryssel,  proposed  to  God  atfirst^  that 
she  would  love  him  and  his  creatures  at  the  same  time,  but  afterwards,  under 
an  impression  that  she  loved  him  alone,  and  in  the  midst  of  a  busy  scene  of 
external  confusion,  she  held  continual  conversation  with  God  like  a  woman 
in  the  society  of  her  husband.  She  would  consent  to  be  judged  by  no  other 
authority  than  the  Bible,  although  she  herself  professed  to  stand  in  no  need 
of  a  written  word  of  God,  and  had  herself  saluted  as  the  mother  of  all  be- 
lievers with  a  new  revelation  to  man.  She  was  persecuted  by  the  Jesuits, 
and  had  some  connections  with  the  Jansenists,  but  she  was  Iicrself  indifferent 
with  respect  to  both  Churches,  and  had  many  admirers  and  bitter  opponents 
in  both,  (fi)    The  Alomhrados.  who  may  almost  be  regarded  as  the  Quakers 

b)  Tie  de  M.  Franr.  de  Paris  Utr.  1729.  and  often.  Kecueil  des  inir.  sur  1e  tombeau  de  P.  Par. 
nUa.  8  voK  Montgeron^  la  v6rit6  des  mlr.  (Par.  1787.)  CoL  174588.  8  v<»k  4.  Mem.  de  Me.  de 
Pompadour.  Par.  1880.  ^o\.  L  p.  57.— Procia  verbaux  des  plusiears  modocina,  dres^(^  par  ordre  de  sa 
U^Jaste  an  sajet  de  qnclqnea  pcrsonnes  soidisantes  agiteea  des  convulsione.  Par.  1782.  M<tHkHm  Dta. 
ad  H.  eccL  vol.  II.  p.  807*8. 

c)  Apologle  des  Jugemens  rendua  cnntre  le  schtsme  par  les  tribnnaux  s^caliera.  Par.  1752.  8  Tola 
Walch,  nst.  Rel.  (Jescb.  vol.  I.  p.  5a  4Sthe. 

d)  Dupac  de  BeUegards,  H.  de  T^L  metropol.  d'Utrecbt.  Utr.  1784.  ed.  3.  1352.  Waldh^  nst 
BeL  6e«cb.  vol  YL  p.  8289w  Tbeol.  Qoartalacb.  Tub.  1826.  P.  U  Augu*ti^  <L  Ersb.  Utrecbt. 
Bonn.lb8S. 

«)  Grigoire  vol  I.  p.  87868.  (Arcbiv.  C  KO.  toL  I.  Bt  2.  p.  189».) 

a)  Oeovrea  p.  P.  PtHrei,  Amst  1679as.  19  Tola.  In  tbe  firrt  voL  is  ber  Life  by  herself  and  l^ 
Ftiret—Walck,  Bel.  Streit  ansa.  d.  Inth.  K.  voL  L  pc  621.  IV,  8918&  W.  Klof^  A.  Bar.  (Zeitach. 
t  blst  Tb.  195L  H.  a)    [Apol.  for  Mad.  Boarlgnon.  Lond.  1699.  a    Translations :  Aoad.  of  Loamed 


520  MODERN  OIIURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  TL    A.  D.  1M8-18S1 

of  Oatholioism,  hare  at  different  times  (since  1575),  but  probably  under  the 
^oitement  of  Protestant  influences,  made  their  appearance  in  Spain.  Michael 
Molinoi  of  Saragossa,  a  zealous  curate  at  Rome,  recommended  as  the  true 
way  of  salvation  that  the  soul  should  seek  to  become  aff^ectionately  one  with 
Qod  by  quiet  prayer  and  a  complete  annihilation  of  its  own  independent  ex- 
istence. The  French  ambassador,  in  the  name  of  the  Jesuits,  demanded  that 
this  Quietism  should  be  rejected  by  the  Church  (1687).  Molinos,  after  abjur- 
ing the  condemned  propositions,  died  while  suffering  a  severe  imprisonment 
in  a  convent  ( 1 696).  (ft)  Madame  Guyon  of  Paris  (d.  1717)  followed  in  his  foot- 
steps, and  even  went  beyond  him  in  some  respects,  but  with  a  love  to  God 
so  exceedingly  ardent,  that  few  have  equalled  it  even  in  their  earthly  attach- 
ments, (c)  Bossuet^  whose  clear  understanding  could  see  nothing  but  a  dan- 
gerous fanaticism  in  a  love  which  had  so  completely  surrendered  all  regard 
for  self,  that  in  its  longings  after  God  it  had  no  desires  even  for  salvation, 
prepossessed  the  mind  of  the  court  against  her.  But  Fenelon  denied  the  jus- 
tice of  her  condemnation,  and  showed  how  true  mysticism  was  to  be  under- 
stood in  accordance  with  the  models  of  Catholic  antiquity,  and  how  it  dionld 
be  looked  upon  as  the  genuine  worship  of  God  in  the  heart,  and  therefore  the 
basis  of  all  the  external  forms  of  the  Church,  (d)  Twenty-three  propositions 
extracted  from  his  book,  Bossuet  had  condemned  at  Rome.  FenelcHi  received 
a  copy  of  this  condemnation  just  as  he  was  ascending  the  pulpit  of  hb  cathe- 
dral. With  the  humility  so  natural  to  his  disposition,  he  immediately  sub- 
mitted to  it,  and  exhorted  his  congregation  to  conform  to  its  directions 
(1699).  (<r)  In  Germany,  Angelas  Silcsius  (ScheflBer  of  Breslau,  d.  1677),  a 
physician,  but  subsequently  a  priest,  although  he  renounced  the  Protestant 
Church  and  the  friendship  of  Jacob  Boehme,  carried  with  him  an  intense 
love  of  the  Saviour.  Although  the  extreme  longings  of  his  heart  threw  him 
Into  the  abyss  of  Pantheism,  his  profound  jpeculations  are  so  transparent, 
his  bold  expressions  are  so  childlike,  and  his  poetry  is  so  delightful,  intellec- 
tual, and  affectionate,  that  they  have  always  been  looked  upon  as  sacred  in 
both  Cliurches.  (/)  Abraham  a  S.  Clara  (U.  Megerle,  d.  1707)  has  given  a 
bold  and  ingenious  expression  of  the  popular  humor  which  prevailed  in  Sua- 


Dlvinefl.  Lond.  170a    Confusion  of  the  Baildere  of  Babel.  Lond.  ITCa    Light  of  the  World  ieS6L 
Light  risen  in  Darkness  17(V8.  abridged,  Lond.  1786.    Reuov.  of  the  Oosp.  Spirit.  Lond.  1817. 12.] 

h)  Ouida  ^piritualo  Kom.  16S1.   In  Spanish  even  In  1675.  in  Lat  by  Francke,  168T,  and  In  Germ, 
by  yirnoW,  1699.— Rcciieil  dcs  div.  pieces  concernant  le  Quictisme.  Amst  1688.    Other  tfafnfs  In 
WfiAnmann^  If.  ecc.  P.  II.  p.  Ml.     C.  E.  Scluirling^  Mystikeren  M.  Molinoe'a  Laero  of  Sl^bne. 
KJobonli.  1&52.  4 

c)  La  Bible  <le  Me.  Guyon.  Col.  (Amst.)  1715sa.  20  vols.— La  vie  de  M.  de  la  Motb«  Gayoo,  6eitt« 
par  clle-mi^me.  Col.  1720.  3  vols.  12.  and  often.  Brl.  1826.  8  vols  C.  Hermety  ZOge  a.  d.  Lehen  d.  Fr. 
v.  G.  Magdeb.  1S45.  [7*.  C.  UpAam,  Life,  Opinion^  and  Experience  of  Me.  O.  New  York.  185L 
2  vols.  12.  Eclect.  Mag.  Aug.  1S5S.  p.  431s8.  Life  and  Kel.  Opinions  of  Mad.  G.  and  of  Keodoo. 
Lond.  1851.  2  vol*.  12.     /..  J/.  C%fW,  Lives  of  Lady  Kuasell  and  Mad.  G.  Boston.  1680. 11] 

d)  Explication  des  inaximes  de  Saints  sar  la  vie  Int^rieare.  Par.  1697. 12.  and  often. 

e)  (JurUu)  Jugement  snr  la  ThcoL  myst  at  sar  lea  demC'lez  de  TeTrqae  de  Meanz  avee  rareh*> 
veque  de  Cambray.  (AmsL  1699.)    Bamuuft  and  Tabtiraud.  (p.  616-16.) 

/)  Cherubinischer  Wandersmann.  BrsL  1657.  and  often.  Manicb.  1816b  1827.  BrL  1890.  180. 
Heiligo  Seolenlust  o.  geistl.  Ilirienlieder  der  verltebten  Psyche.  BraL  1657.  Manicfa.  1826.  WItip 
mann,  A.  S.  als  Converiit,  myst.  Dicbter  a.  Polemiker.  Angsb.  1842.  (  W.  Sehradsr,  A.  8.  HaL  1861 
i.)    A.  KahUrt,  A.  8.  Brsl.  ISM. 


CHAP.  IL    CATHOLIC  CHURCH  TILL  1750.    %4S8.  NEW  ORDEBS.  521 

bia  and  Vienna  with  respect  to  the  perversities  of  the  world,  and  in  favor  of 
the  pioos  morality  of  his  native  land,  (g) 

§  428.    N^ewly  Established  Orders, 

Bouthillier  de  la  Rand  (d.  1700),  after  a  dissipated  youth,  became,  in 
consequence  of  a  painful  accident,  dissatisfied  with  the  world,  distributed  his 
wealth  among  the  poor,  resigned  all  his  livings  except  that  of  La  Trappe,  of 
which  he  had  been  an  abbot  even  in  his  boyhood,  and  betook  himself  to  a 
residence  in  that  convent  (1662).  That  he  might  revive  the  original  rule  of 
Cisteauz,  he  imposed  upon  the  monks  there  a  terrible  system  of  self-denial, 
which  deprived  them  even  of  the  pleasures  of  conversation  and  reading.  A 
few  oolonies  of  the  Trappists  were  founded  in  Italy,  Great  Britain,  Grermany, 
and  America,  and  some  were  formed  for  nuns,  (a)  In  France,  where  popular 
instruction  was  not  regularly  attended  to  by  either  the  Church  or  the  State, 
the  Society  of  the  Brothers  of  the  Christian  Schools  (Ignorantins)  was  found- 
ed for  that  purpose  by  Baptist  de  la  SaUe  (1724),  but  more  especially  for  the 
education  of  future  teachers.  A  Neapolitan  named  Ligvori  (d.  1787),  with 
whom  the  will  of  the  pope  was  equivalent  to  the  will  of  God,  formed  the 
Congregation  of  the  Most  Sacred  Redeemer  (Redemptorists,  Liguorists),  a 
friendly  variety  of  the  Jesuits,  and  in  subsequent  times  affording  to  them  a 
refuge  and  a  hope,  (h)  In  addition  to  the  associations  without  regular  vows, 
were  established  sisterhoods  for  the  Adoration  of  the  Heart  of  Jesus  and 
Mary^  for  the  cultivation  of  a  sensuous  kind  of  worship  which  had  been 
recommended  ever  since  the  middle  of  the  seventeenth  centuiy  by  the  Jesu« 
its,  at  the  suggestion  of  love-intoxicated  nuns.  The  establishment  of  this 
order  had  been  frequently  declined,  but  it  was  finally  (1765)  authorized 
at  Rome,  and  was  introduced  in  some  places.  It  was  a  subject  of  debate 
among  divines  whether  the  actually  bleeding  heart,  or  a  mere  symbol  of 
divine  love,  was  the  object  of  adoration.  By  the  people,  however,  these 
votaries  were  often  ridiculed  as  Cordicolatras  or  Marionettes,  (c) 

§  429.    Spread  of  Christianity,     Cont.  from  §  894*j. 

1.  The  Church  in  China  continued  to  make  some  gradual  advances,  prin- 
cipally through  the  assistance  of  the  missionary  seminary  at  Paris  (after 
1663).  Instances  of  oppression  were  not  numerous,  and  were  generally  of 
short  duration.  But  the  mendicant  friars  were  more  and  more  urgent  in 
their  complaints  at  Rome  against  the  mingling  of  Christianity  with  idolatry. 


g)  JadM  der  Erzsehelm.  Bonn.  Salzb.  1687ffi.  4  vols,  and  often.  Iluy !  n.  Pftay !  der  Welt  Wlirtx. 
1 707.  4.  and  often.  Reim  dich  a  ich  liss  dlch,  d.  L  allerly  Materten,  Dbcurs  n.  Predigtcn.  Salzb. 
17S7.  A.  and  often.    Das  Ocdiegensto  a.  8.  W.  Blanbeuren.  1340fla.    Werke,  Lindnn  1846sa. 

a)  Rand :  Lettres,  pabl.  par  B.  Oonod,  Par.  1816.  Tr.  de  la  saintete  et  des  devoirs  de  la  vie  monaa* 
tjqna  16S8L  2  toI&  4.  On  the  other  side:  MahiUon^  Tr.  dea  etudes  monast  1691.  and  often. — Martol- 
Her,  Vte  de  TAbb^  de  la  Trappe.  Par.  170S.  2  vols.  12.  Chateaubriand^  Vie  de  Kancd.  Par.  1844. 
trim.  1845.  L.  P.  a  Hist  civile,  rel.  et  litter,  de  Tabbaye  de  la  Tr.  Par.  1824.  Ritsert,  Orden  d. 
*t>Bppiaten.  Dnnst  188S.    OaiUardin,  lea  Trappistea  Par.  1844.  vol.  I. 

h)  Oeuvrea  completofli  Par.  1885.  14  vols.  8.  and  12.  A.  Giatini,  vita  dt«l  b.  Alfonso  Llg.  Rom. 
l815ii  4  Vienna.  1886.    Jsancard,  Vie  da  b.  Alt  Lig.  Loavain.  1829. 

e)  BenedicU  XIV.  de  server.  Dei  beatif.  IV,  80.  Archiv.  t  KO.  voL  I.  St  2.  p.  177b\  Wackier 
tia  Zeitseb.  t  hist  Th.  18S4.  St  1. 


522  MODKBN  CHUBGH  HI8T0BY.    PEK  YL    A.  D.  1648-1808. 

For  a  long  time  the  Jesuits,  however,  sncceeded  by  oraft  and  power  to  de- 
fend themselves  against  the  orders  sent  to  them  from  Rome  on  this  subject 
The  legate  Tournoii  died  while  enduring  a  confinement  at  Macao,  brought 
upon  him  by  their  means  (1710).  At  last  their  adversaries  were  successful 
(1746).  No  sooner,  however,  were  the  sacred  usages  of  the  nation  rejected, 
than  a  persecution  seldom  suspended  was  commenced,  from  which  only  a  few 
unimportant  fragments  of  the  Church  were'  ever  saved.  2.  In  the  ^«t 
Indies  likewise,  the  hope  of  success  depended  upon  the  compliance  of  the 
missionaries  with  the  customs  of  the  Brahmans,  and  their  incorporation  of 
the  religious  and  social  usages  of  the  people  into  the  system  of  Christianity. 
When  the  Jesuits  at  Pondichery  represented  in  one  of  their  sacred  dramas 
the  destruction  of  the  Indian  gods  by  the  Knight  St.  George  (1701),  a  perse- 
cution was  immediately  commenced  in  that  country;  and  when  the  bull 
against  the  admixture  of  heathenish  customs  with  the  Christian  religion  was 
enforced  (1742),  the  progress  of  the  mission  was  at  an  end.  (a)  8.  In 
Thibet^  the  gospel  was  preached  (after  1707)  by  the  Capuchins,  and  they 
were  allowed  to  erect  a  hospitium  there.  But  the  worship  6f  the  Dalai 
Lama  was  itself  too  much  like  an  ascendant  papacy,  to  present  much  hope 
of  success  in  the  proclamation  of  a  Roman  Christianity,  (b)  4.  In  South 
America^  a  splendid' church  organization  according  to  the  European  style 
was  developed.  In  a  portion  of  North  America,  where  the  donunion  of 
France  was  extended,  were  also  established  component  parts  of  the  Oallican 
Church. 


CHAP,  m.— ROMAN  CATHOLIC  CHURCH  UNTIL  1814. 

I.     2klATTBB8    PrEUMINABY    TO    THB    REVOLUTION. 

§  480.    French  Philosophy.    Cont./rom  §  416. 

Corr^epondance  liter.  phiL  et  criL  par  Grimm  et  Diderot,  Far.  ISlSas.  16  yoIa.  Extracts:  Bfae* 
dcnb.  1820.—  Walch,  nat.  ReL  Qcsch.  vol  I.  .p.  473a8.  (.;:  A.  t>.  Stark)  Triumph  d.  phU.  iin  la  Jahrh. 
FrkC  1808.  2  vols,  recently  edit  by  Buchfelnsr^  Landah.  1884.  {t.  SchiM)  Oewb.  y.  Stutaverandr. 
unter  Ludwig  XVI.  o.  Entst.  Fortscb.  u.  Wirka  d.  aogen.  neuen  Phil.  Lpoi  1S26-^  6  vola^  L.  Ler- 
minier,  de  rinfluence  de  la  pbil.  du  IS.  B.  Par.  1S33.  Lpai  1S35.  ScMonter,  vol  L  p.  477.  II.  44888.— liter, 
of  the  French  Classics  in  Bbert.  [J.  D.  Morell,  IIlsL  and  Grit  View  of  the  Spec.  PhiL  of  Enr.  in 
the  19th  cent  Lond.  1847.  2  ed.  &  New  York.  1848.  a  P.  Damiron^  Easai  aor  TH.  de  la  pha  a  Fr. 
•a  XVIIe.  S.  8  ed.  Par.  1840.  2  vola.  a  O.  If.  Utcet,  Biog.  H.  of  Phil.  Ser.  IL  voL  lY.  Lond.  1849l 
4  Tola,  la     TetiMmann't  U.  of  PhiL  Lond.  1850.  a] 

The  government  of  rojal  mistresses  (Pomocracy)  in  the  court,  the  perse- 
tiution  of  the  Protestants,  the  maltreatment  of  pietj  in  the  Jansenist  oontro- 
versy,  the  natural  development  of  the  national  mind,  and  the  inflnenoe  of 
English  Deism,  conspired  to  form  in  France  an  opposition  similar  to  that 
Deism,  but  such  as  naturally  sprung  up  against  an  infalUhle  Church  in  a  des- 
potic and  corrupt  state.  Bodins  Septiloquia  recognized  the  daims  of  all 
religions,  that  the  religion  of  godliness  and  rectitude  in  them  all  might 


a)  S  897.  nt.  d, 

b)  Relatione  del  prlncipio  et  atato  preaente  della  miaa.  del  Tibet  Bom.  1742.  4    StdudUn 
Arohir.  t  KOeach.  vol  L  Bt  a   • 


CHAP.  IIL    CATHOLIC  CHUBCH  TILL  1814    $  480.  FBENCH  PHILOSOPHY.     523 

acknowledged,  (n)  In  a  fictitious  book  of  'travels,  Vairasse  distinguished 
between  true  Christianity  and  the  hierarchy,  against  which  his  book  was 
directed,  (h)  Eren  in  the  canting  court  of  Louis  XIV.,  who  finally  gave  his 
consent  that  even  Tartufe  should  be  performed  in  his  presence,  it  was  not 
looked  upon  as  inconsistent  with  the  rules  of  good  society  to  ridicule  religion 
as  well  as  hypocrisy.  VolUtire  (d.  1778)  was  not  quite  insensible  to  the  pos- 
sibility of  the  existence  of  a  God,  in  whose  honor  he  erected  a  plain  church, 
nor  to  the  beauty  of  Christianity,  but  in  a  series  of  sprightly  essays  after 
1715),  with  the  most  nklve  simplicity  and  ignorance  of  facts,  he  gave  up  all 
its  historical  relations,  and  sacrificed  the  life  of  religion  itself  to  a  spirit  of 
universal  scoffing.  Montesquieu^  before  laying  the  foundation  of  his  future 
government,  presented  the  mirror  of  an  unbiased  common  sense  before  the 
received  doctrines  and  the  compulsory  measures  of  the  Church  (1721).  Phi- 
losophy so  entirely  withdrew  to  the  territory  presided  over  by  the  five  senses, 
that  the  mind  of  man  was  finally  regarded  as  a  dream  of  the  flesh,  and  love 
as  the  hypocrisy  of  selfishness.  This  worldly  philosophy  was  carried  to  its 
complete  results  by  Condillac  (d.  1780),  in  Holbach's  circle  it  was  fearlessly 
applied  to  practical  life,  (c)  while  Uehetiu^  (d.  1771)  tempered  it  with  an 
elevated  humanity.  In  this  spirit,  Diderot  (d.  1784),  whose  religion  it  was 
to  destroy  all  religion,  edited  the  Encyclopedie  (after  1751),  intended  to  be  a 
general  survey  of  all  human  knowledge,  clear  and  grand  with  respect  to  the 
worldly  tendencies  of  the  mind  and  in  its  efforts  against  all  kinds  of  slavery, 
but  hostile  to  all  eternal  realities  and  aspirations  above  the  world.  Besides 
these  were  a  host  of  inferior  works,  in  which  the  oriental  simplicity  of  the 
Scriptures  was  made  the  subject  of  amusement  either  by  bold  derision  or  bj 
sentimental  wantonness,  and  all  systems  of  faith  were  ridiculed  as  priestcraft. 
Raynal  deprived  history  of  its  true  glory  as  a  picture  of  a  divine  household ; 
even  in  BuffarCs  sublime  researches,  the  Creator  is  placed  far  behind  a  self- 
producing  nature ;  Lalande  proclaimed  the  laws  of  a  heaven  without  a  God ; 
and  in  fact  the  gospel  was  generally  regarded  as  a  mere  astronomical 
myth,  id)  The  enthusiastic  spirit  of  Bousseau  (1712-78)  found  many  things 
in  the  gospel  for  which  his  nature  had  a  vtrong  affinity,  but  in  consequence 
of  his  rejection  of  all  history,  he  was  compelled  to  oppose  every  thing  in  it 
of  a  historical  character.  By  holding  up  a  state  of  nature  in  contrast  with 
the  artificial  condition  of  human  society,  the  Jesuitic  education  then  in 
vogue,  and  the  supernatural  revelation  of  the  Scriptures,  he  contributed  more 
than  all  the  scoffers  to  endanger  the  Church,  since  he  thus  showed  how  one 
could  speak  with  earnestness  and  even  transport  of  divine  things,  without 
being  a  Christian,  (e)  This  opposition  was  powerfbl  at  that  time,  because 
those  who  were  the  favorites  of  the  nation,  who  gave  laws  to  the  fashion- 


a)  CoUoqalam  hepteplomereB  de  abditis  reram  sublim.  arcaolA.  1G08.    GuKrauer,  das  HepUpL 
des  JemD  Bodin.  BrL  1841. 

h)  Hist  des  S«verauibes.  Par.  16778flL  8  vols.  12.  Snizb.  1689.  8  voK 

e)  Syst^me  de  la  nature.  Load.  (A mat)  1770.  2  Tola,  and  often.  Liegn.  1788.  2  void. 

d)  DupuiH^  Origine  de  tous  les  culte&  Par.  179S.  8  Tola,  and  otlen.  1S87.    In  the  Eztracta  bj  Bh6, 
Stattg.  1S89. 

e)  Me.  de  Stail^  Lettrca  sur  lea  oavr.  et  le  caract^re  d.  B.  Q^  17S0.    {Mueeet-Pathay)  H.  de  Ia 
▼to  et  dea  oorr.  de  B.  Par.  1831.  2  vola.    ITooUer,  blogr.  Aoft.  188^  p.  81aiw 


524  MODEBN  CHUBCH  HISTORY.    FEB.  YL    A.  D.  1648-18(01 

able  world,  and  were  honored  T^ith  the  friendship  of  the  northern  monarohfl, 
were  its  principal  representatives,  and  spoke  of  Christianity  as  a  superannu- 
ated stage  of  civilization.  The  measures  adopted  by  the  government  against 
them  were  but  partial,  and  generally  operated  in  their  favor.  As  the  hier- 
archy, who  had  little  else  at  command  but  learned  lore,  were  no  longer 
allowed  to  burn  the  authors,  they  defended  themselves  by  burning  the  books. 
These  works,  however,  expressed  the  general  sentiment  of  the  French  nation. 
On  the  side  of  the  hierarchy  were  the  civil  power,  inmiense  wealth,  and  a 
nobility  with  which  it  was  in  numerous  ways  connected.  On  the  other  side 
was  nearly  a  whole  nation,  including  a  minority  oven  of  the  hierarchy  and 
the  nobility,  with  the  conviction  that  their  power  was  founded  upon  a  de- 
ception, and  that  their  wealth  had  been  ui\justly  drawn  from  a  heavily 
taxed  people. 

§  431.     Clement  XIIL  (1758-69)  and  the  Jesuits. 

Bower^  RambacK,  vol  X.  2.  p.  SSlss.  {Le  Bref)  S*mml  d.  Bcbrr.  d.  Aufbeb.  d.  Jesaltenord. 
heir.  Frkf.  u.  L.  (Ulm.)  1778-84.  4  vols.  [J.  Poynder,  H.  of  the  Jeftultat  Load.  1818.  S  Tola.  S.  A. 
Amould,  Les  Jesuites,  Histoire,  Types,  Moean,  Mysteries.  Par.  1848.  3  volt.  8L] 

Clement  XIIL  (Rezzonico)  was  chosen  pope  through  ihe  influence  of  the 
Jesuits,  and  with  pious  conscientiousness  exposed  the  papal  authority  to  the 
most  imminent  hazard,  that  he  might  avert  their  fate.  They  had  indeed 
gained  a  victory  over  the  Jansenists,  but  it  was  at  the  expense  of  the  popular 
(slvot.  On  account  of  their  influence  at  courts  they  were  hated  by  states- 
men, their  engagements  in  trade  involved  them  often  in  diflSculties  with  the 
merchants,  and  their  power  over  the  conscience  made  them  obnoxious  to  all 
classes.  The  very  dislike  which  so  many  of  that  age  felt  toward  Christian- 
ity, and  the  whole  spirit  of  the  coming  generation  now  making  itself  percep- 
tibly felt,  seemed  to  demand  them  as  the  first  sacrifice.  The  result  was  by  no 
means  certain,  since  all  the  nations  of  Southern  Europe  had  been  educated  in 
their  school.  On  the  request  of  the  Portuguese  government,  Benedict  XIV. 
had  forbidden  them  to  engage  in  commerce,  and  when  dying,  he  committed 
to  the  Patriarch  of  Lisbon  the  w^k  of  reforming  them.  The  order  to  this 
effect  was,  however,  revoked  by  Clement.  By  an  exchange  with  Spain,  Por- 
tugal had  obtained  a  portion  of  Paraguay  (1753).  The  Portuguese  were 
however  driven  back  by  an  Indian  army,  and  although  the  Jesuits  denied 
any  participation  in  an  insurrection  which  then  occurred,  it  was  certain  that 
the  insurrection  was  impossible  without  their  connivance.  Carvalho,  Mar- 
quis of  PombaL,  was  anxious  to  withdraw  the  monarchy  and  the  nation  from 
all  connection  with  the  hierarchy  and  the  nobility.  But  although  the  minis- 
ter possessed  unlimited  power,  he  knew  he  could  not  effect  such  a  revolution 
while  surrounded  by  the  Jesuits.  An  attempt  to  assassinate  the  king  supplied 
an  occasion  for  impeaching  them  of  high  treason.  The  result  was  that  they 
were  for  ever  excluded  (Sept.  8,  1759)  from  Portugal,  and  their  property  was 
confiscated.  The  pope  interceded  for  them  in  vain ;  his  nuncio  was  sent  out 
of  the  country  (1760),  and  all  connection  with  Rome  was  broken  off,  (a)    It 


a)  ^administration  de  M.  de  PombaL  Amst  1789.  4    J.  AnitK,  Memoirs  of  the  M.  de  Pom 
Lood.  1848.  8  vola.  6.—{KlauHng)  SammL  d.  nat  Bchrr.  d.  J«iw  In  P.  betr.  A.  d.  ItaL  Frk£  u. 


CHAP.  IIL    CATHOUG  CHURCH  TILL  1814    $  481.  THE  JESUITS.  525 

was  thns  proved  that  the  overthrow  of  the  Jesuits  was  not  impossible.  The 
bankruptcy  of  the  Jesait  la  Valette  in  France,  was  seized  upon  as  an  occasion 
for  making  the  whole  order  responsible  for  the  unfortunate  speculation  in 
trade  by  one  of  its  members,  and  for  examining  its  constitution.  The  Parlia- 
ment of  Paris  summoned  the  Jesuits  before  its*  bar  (1762),  an  apostolical 
brief,  in  which  the  holy  Father  unburdened  his  heart  of  its  troubles,  and 
Jesuitism  was  identified  with  Catholicism,  was  laid  aside  as  if  it  were  the 
letter  of  a  private  individual,  and  when  public  opinion  had  been  gained  over 
by  the  publication  of  the  dangerous  doctrines  of  which  the  Jesuits  were  ac- 
cused, they  were  banished  from  Franco  as  dangerous  to  the  state  (1764).  (b) 
The  other  Bourbon  courts  ordered  them  to  be  hastily  and  violently  seized  and 
transported  beyond  the  boundaries  of  their  respective  territories  (1767).  It 
was  in  vain  that  the  pope  issued  a  bull  (1765),  in  which  he  showed  that  the 
order  was  sacred,  and  indispensable  to  the  interests  of  the  Church.  He  only 
ventured  to  annul  the  edicts  of  the  Duke  of  Parma^  and  to  threaten  others 
with  an  excommunication  (1768).  France,  however,  took  possession  of  Avig- 
non ;  Naples,  of  Benevento ;  and  all  the  Bourbon  princes  declared  such  fanati- 
cal decrees  of  excommunication  utterly  unreasonable,  (c) 

§  432.     Clement  XIV.  (1769-74)  and  the  Jesuits. 

Lettres  int^r^santes  du  P.  Clem.  XIV.  trad,  dii  latin  et  do  rital.  p.  1e  Marq.  de  Caraccioli,  (not 
•Itogethcr  authentic.)  Par.  1776s.  8  vols,  and  often,  ital.  u.  deutsch.  Lettcre  ed.  altrc  uperc  di  GangaDclH. 
Firenze.  1829.  Clem.  XIV.  Epp  et  Brevia  selectlora,  ex.  secret.  Ubb.  Vatic  ed.  A.  Theiner,  Par. 
'iBOi.—  WalcK,  nst.  Rel.  Gescb.  vol.  I.  p.  a  20188.  Ctiraccioll,  Vie  da  P.  Cltrm.  Par.  1775.  Leben 
Clem.  XIV.  Fret  u.  L.  1775.  (by  liaumoiU)  Gang.,  Clem.  XIV.  u.  s.  Zelt.  Brl.  1S47.  A.  TheiMr, 
H.  da  PonUC  do  Clem.  XIV.  Par.  1852.  2  vols.  [J/.  D'AUnibert,  An  Account  of  tbo  Destmction 
of  the  Jesuits  In  France,  tram  tho  Fr.  Lend.  176C.  12.] 

In  the  Conclave  there  was  a  severe  struggle  between  the  parties  of  the 
king  and  of  the  Jesuits.  The  Bourbons  were  however  victorious,  and  se- 
cured the  election  of  Ganganelli^  a  Minorite,  who  had  always  disapproved 
of  the  measures  of  his  predecessor,  on  the  ground  that  they  sacrificed  the 
mterests  of  the  papacy  itself  to  those  of  the  Jesuits.  Clement  XIV,  was  of 
low  origin,  his  character  was  not  very  commanding,  but  he  possessed  consid- 
erable talents,  a  noble  manliness,  and  at  the  same  time  a  general  mildness  of 
disposition,  and  for  a  pope  he  was  eminently  liberal.  He  governed  without 
the  aid  of  cardinals  or  nepotes,  and  instead  of  aiming  to  build  magnificent 
edifices,  he  endeavored  to  alleviate  distress  in  cottages.  He  abolished  the 
reading  of  the  sacramental  bull  (in  coena  Domini),  and  it  was  never  after- 
wards resumed,  {a)    By  some  concessions  made  to  Portugal  and  the  Bourbon 

1759-62.  4  vols.  Deductio  cbronol  et  analytics,  nbi  horrendae  manifestantur  clades  a  Jcs.  Soo.  Losl- 
taniae  ejosqae  oolonlis  illatao,  ed.  J.  de  Seabra  SilviuB^  Olislp.  1771.  2  vols.  WalcK,  nst  ReL.  Oescb. 
vol.  II.  p.  5788.  G.  ».  J^urr,  Gescb.  d.  Jea  in  P.  unter  Pomb.  Numb.  17S7.  2  vols.  J.  F.  M.  r. 
Olfera^  u.  d.  Mordvers.  gegen  d.  Kr)nlg  Joseph  v.  P.  BerL  1S89.  4 

h)  Ex  traits  des  assertions  danKercusoH  ct  pemiciensos,  quo  les  Jos.  ont  enseigneea  avoc  Tapproba- 
tion  de  lears  Suporieure.  Verifles  par  les  commissairra  du  Parlemont.  Par.  1672. — Choi^eul^  Staats> 
Denkw&rd.  r.  ihm  selb.<it  from  the  Fr.  Bern.  1790.  Nova  Acto  hist  ecc  vol.  XIIL  p.  4SSkB,  Taba- 
raud^  £88ai  aur  Tutat  des  Jcs.  en  France,  ed.  2.  Par.  1828. 

e)  Walchy  nst  Rd.  Oeach.  vol.  III.  p.  lO^ea. 

a)  At  l«Mt  not  until  Easter,  18S0,  according  to  the  aathor's  personal  obsenration. 


526  MODEBN  cnUBCH  HISTOBT.    FEB.  VL    A.  D.  1648-186a 

oonrts,  harmony  was  once  more  established  with  them.  When  they  nrged 
him  to  abolish  the  order  of  the  Jesuits,  he  hesitated  fbr  a  while,  debating 
whether  it  were  better  to  destroy  than  to  reform  it,  but  at  last,  on  the  16th 
Aug.,  1778,  the  brief  called  Dominus  acRedemtor  noater(b)  announced  its  abo- 
lition, on  the  ground  that  the  peace  of  the  Church  required  such  a  step.  In 
Rome,  the  execution  of  this  ball  was  secured  by  the  employment  of  a  mili- 
tary force.  The  number  of  members  connected  with  the  order  at  that  time 
in  twenty-four  provinces  was  22,689.  Their  treasures  and  papers  had  been 
placed  where  they  could  not  be  found.  The  suppression  was  enforced  in  all 
the  Catholic  courts,  apd  even  Maria  Theresa  acquiesced  in  it  when  copies  of 
her  own  confessional  secrets  had  been  transmitted  to  her  from  kome.  (c) 
Frederic  II.,  however,  had  so  much  pride  that  he  would  not  put  down  the 
order  for  a  while  in  Silesia,  and  it  was  favored  in  the  Polish  provinces  of 
Russia,  under  a  vicar  general,  (d)  In  other  countries  also  the  order  main- 
tained a  secret  existence,  waiting  for  a  revival  which  it  was  taught  by  some 
old  legends  to  expect,  and  individuals  have  every  where  been  fonnd  protest- 
ing against  the  lawfulness  of  its  abolition.  The  fate  of  the  Jesuits,  Uke  that 
of  the  Templars,  was  not  altogether  undeserved ;  but  like  the  latter,  they  were 
condemned  without  a  legal  sentence  or  a  process  of  law,  and  many  merito- 
rious persons  connected  with  them  were  rewarded  with  a  helpless  old  age. 
The  missionary  and  educational  operations  of  all  Catholic  countries  were 
much  embarrassed  by  their  suppression.  Avignon  and  Benevento  were  re- 
stored to  the  pope,  but  he  could  not  prevent  the  governments  of  SpaiA, 
Naples,  and  Venice  from  doing  as  they  pleased  with  the  Church  and  its  pro- 
perty in  those  countries.  He  was  well  aware,  that  by  the  decree  for  the  abo- 
lition of  the  order  of  the  Jesuits,  he  had  signed  his  own  death-warranty  and 
he  died  (Sept.  22)  abandoned  by  nil,  with  some  evidence  of  having  been 
poisoned.  («) 

§  433.    Pius  VI.  (1774-99)  and  his  Age,  until  1789. 

Conclave.  ( Walck,  n»t  BeL  Oosch.  vol.  Y.  p.  2S988.)  {0.  C.  Ade)  Lebens-  u.  BegierangigMeh. 
P.  VL  Cesena.  (Ulm.)  1781-96.  6  voU  P.  P.  W(Hf,  Oescb.  d.  rOm.  K.  unter  P.  YL  Z&r.  1798ai  Lpe. 
1802.  7  voK  {J.  F.  Bourgoing)  Mum.  but  Pie  YL  Par.  1799.  8  voli— Ueber  die  gegenw.  Laga  d. 
rom.  Kath.  {Plancke^  nst  Bel.  Oesch.  vol.  L) 

The  Bourbons  consented  to  the  election  of  Angelo  Braschi^  because  they 
felt  assured  from  his  moderation  that  his  partiality  for  the  Jesuits  would  not 
be  sufScient  to  induce  him  to  attempt  their  restoration.  The  treasures  Pius 
VI.  acquired  from  the  states  of  the  Church  during  the  first  tranquil  years  of 
his  reign,  were  spent  in  building  and  in  draining  the  Pontine  marshes.  His 
liberality  is  extolled  by  numberless  inscriptions.  The  convents  were  at  that 
time  assailed  by  innumerable  caricatures,  and  were  regarded  as  no  longer  tol- 
erable except  as  hospitals  for  diseased  minds,  (a)  Many  princes  saw  that  they 

V)  Dated  from  Jaly  21.  Acta  hist  eec.  vol  L  p.  145m. 

c)  After  Fesaler  and  Hormayr:  A.  K.  Z.  1882.  N.  160. 

<f)  LtUUroVi,  RuBsL  u.  d.  Jes.  1770-1800.  TJebera  v.  Bin^  'Lps.  1846c 

e)  Walch^  nst.  Kel.  Oescti.  vol  Y.  p.  282s8.  Le  Bret,  Mag.  vol  YL  p.  14408L  On  the  other  haiiA^ 
V. :  Wie  lebte  u.  starb  Gang.,  by  J.  RHchsfibach.  (?)  NensL  1881. 

a)  £.  g.  Troix  est  trop.  Capitulation  do  la  France  aveo  aes  MoloeiL  Haye^  1767.  IS.  (by  Borm:^ 
Natarge8ch.-d.  Mdnobth.  178& 


CHAP.  III.    CATHOUG  CHUBCH  TILL  ISli.    S  488.  PIUS  YL  527 

might,  witboQt  the  least  infringement  of  their  faith,  and  very  mnoh  to  their 
credit  as  friends  of  general  improvement,  take  possession  of  the  immense 
wealth  in  the  hands  of  the  monks.  The  pope  himself  appeared  to  he  a  civil 
prince,  and  the  head  of  the  Church  merely  from  the  favor  of  other  princes. 
The  bishops,  however,  dearly  saw  that  if  they  became  independent  of  the 
pope,  they  most  become  dependent  upon  the  kings.  The  clergy  foresaw  that 
the  property  of  the  Church  would  be  quite  as  acceptable  to  the  secular  lords 
as  the  wealth  of  the  convents.  Even  those  who  cared  nothing  about  the 
matter,  were  of  the  opinion  that  barracks  were  not  much  more  desirable  than 
convents.  The  faith  or  the  superstition  of  a  large  portion  of  the  people  was 
such  as  to  make  them  entirely  dependent  upon  the  clergy  for  their  religion. 
Accordingly,  the  great  masses  were  gradually  formed  into  parties  favorable 
or  opposed  to  a  reform.  In  Portugal^  the  system  of  things  established  by  the 
Tiolence  of  Pombal  was  immediately  terminated  when  he  was  himself  over- 
thrown, on  the  death  of  the  king  (1777).  In  Spain^  Count  Aranda,  who,  in 
accordance  with  his  French  education,  had  made  (after  1762)  the  inquisition 
and  the  system  of  education  dependent  upon  the  government,  was  removed 
from  his  station  (1772),  and  Don  Olatides  repented  in  the  dungeons  of  the 
inquisition  (after  1776)  that  he  ever  attempted  to  cultivate  by  Protestant 
colonies  the  Sierra  Morena,  which  was  now  restored  to  the  robbers.  But 
germs  of  hostility  to  the  hierarchy  still  remained  in  all  parts  of  the  penin- 
sula, combined  with  a  disposition  to  strive  after  a  political  constitution.  In 
Germany^  conflicting  powers  were  measuring  their  strength,  henhiehly  who 
had  brought  from  Gottingen  to  Mayence  his  doubts  respecting  the  Messianic 
prophecies,  was  deposed  and  abused  (1774).  {b)  Steinhuhler^  a  young  lawyer, 
was  imprisoned  at  Salzburg  for  some  jest  at  the  Catholic  ceremonies,  was 
condemned  to  death  as  a  blasphemer  (1781),  had  his  sentence  commuted  to 
banishment  from  the  country  and  ecclesiastical  penance,  and  finally  died 
under  his  ill-treatment."  (c)  When  the  preacher  Gattsner  cast  out  devils  (after 
1773)  in  the  name  of  Jesus,  thousands  of  persona  were  found  at  EUwanger 
and  Ratisbon  possessed  and  insane.  Some  of  the  patients  appeared  to  be 
cured,  but  few  received  permanent  benefit.  Those  who  believed  in  the  mira- 
cles, appealed  to  them  as  proofs  against  the  Protestants  and  in  favor  of  the 
Jesuits.  Most  of  the  neighboring  bishops,  then  the  emperor,  and  finally  even 
the  Roman  court  condemned  the  whole  proceeding.  (</)  In  Bavaria^  the 
Order  of  the  Illuminati  was  founded  by  Weishavpt  (1777),  on  a  Masonic 
basis  and  with  Jesuitic  forms,  by  which  an  intelligence  superior  to,  and  irre- 
spective of  all  ecclesiastical  divisions  might  be  diffused  amon^  the  people. 
This  powerful  association  was  destroyed  by  the  government  (1785).  (e)  In 
Nov.  1780,  the  Emperor  Joseph  I  J,  obtained  the  long-desired  sovereignty 
over  the  hereditary  provinces  of  Austria.    His  administration  was  equivalent 


b)  Acta  hist,  ecc  nost.  temp,  vol  III.  p.  902*s.     Walch^  nst  Eel.  Oeech.  vol.  VIIL  p.  Tsa. 

c)  A(\er  Muchler:  MenzO,  Relse  n.  Oestr.  1S82.  p.  lOa 

d)  General  view  and  Literature:   Walch,  vol.  VI.  p.  871.  64188. 

«)  {WeUhaupt)  Gewh.  d.  Verfolgung  d.  Ill  Frkf.  u.  L.  1786.  roL  L  and  oth.  Einlge  Originalsch. 
d.  IlL  O.  auf  hiichst  Befebl.  Municti,  1787.  Anhang  t.  d.  Originalsch.  Frkt  1787.  System  u.  Folgen 
d.  Ill  O.  Mnnicb,  1787. 


528  MODEBN  CHURCH  HBTOBT.    FEB.  YL    A.  D.  164S.180& 

to  a  reyolotioi^  in  conseqaence  of  his  dictatorial  measures.  With  respect  to 
the  Ohurch,  his  plan  required :  that  it  should  be  separated  fixnn  all  foreign 
inflaenoe,  and  made  subject  to  the  government ;  that  it  should  be  made  a 
school  for  the  instrnction  of  the  people ;  and  that  all  institutions  which  could 
not  be  made  subservient  to  the  public  welfare  shonld  be  destroyed.  Law 
upon  law  was  enacted  for  the  attainment  of  these  objects,  and  the  represen- 
tations of  the  bishops  and  the  protests  of  the  nuncio  were  alike  ineffectual. 
It  was  then  that  the  pope,  a  fine-looking  and  eloquent  man,  vain  of  both 
these  qualities,  and  confiding  much  in  the  power  of  his  personal  address, 
resolved  to  conquer  the  heart  of  the  emperor,  and  awaken  the  respect  which 
prevailed  in  former  times  among  the  people  beyond  the  Alps,  by  the  presence 
of  the  vicar  of  Christ.  He  entered  Vienna  on  the  22d  March,  1782,  with  a 
splendid  procession.  He  could  not  indeed  deliver  by  his  intercessions  even 
one  of  the  convents  devoted  to  destruction  as  useless.  But  as  the  prelates 
thought  it  better  for  them  to  obey  the  pope  than  the  emperor,  and  as  under 
their  influence  the  people  valued  their  ancient  ancestral  usages  more  than 
the  liberty  and  equality  which  had  been  forced  upon  them,  the  dying  empe- 
ror (1790)  found  tliat  all  lie  hod  created  was  annihilated,  and  that  only  what 
he  had  destroyed  remained  unchanged.  (./')  The  feeling  of  constitutional 
independence  in  Rome  had  gained  a  solid  basis  by  the  labors  of  Nie,  r. 
Hontheim^  and  a  recantation  extorted  from  the  frightened  old  man  (1778) 
could  not  invalidate  the  influence  of  his  proofs  with  respect  to  the  origin  of 
the  papal  power.  (//)  The  four  archbishops,  offended  at  the  establishment  of 
a  new  nunciature  at  Munich  (1785),  took  ground  against  every  extraordinary 
jurisdiction  of  the  pope  on  German  territory,  and  associated  themselves  at 
Ems  on  the  principle  of  an  independent  national  church  (1786).  They  were 
immediately  sustained  by  the  emperor  himself.  The  University  of  jQSemn  was 
founded  by  the  Elector  of  Cologne  as  a  school  for  enlightened  Catholicism. 
The  bishops,  however,  thought  themselves  safer  in  obeying  the  distant  pope 
than  the  archbishops ;  the  Bavarian  Palatinate  followed  its  ancient  policy  of 
receiving  advantages  over  the  national  Church  directly  from  the  hand  of  the 
pope,  and  when  the  archbishops  became  frightened  at  the  storms  whidi  took 
place  beyond  the  Rhine  in  behalf  of  freedom,  tliey  also  hastened  to  become 
reconciled  with  Rome  (1789).  (A)  Leopold  of  Tuscany^  in  the*  same  spirit  as 
his  brother  had  exhibited  in  Austria,  attempted  by  the  agency  of  Scipio 
Jiicci,  Bishop  of  Pistoia  and  Prato,  to  reform  the  polity  of  the  Church.  At 
a  synod  of  his  clergy  at  Pistoia  (l7bC},  the  principles  of  the  Gallican  Chnroh 


/)  Acta  a  Pio  VL  causa  itineris  Vindob.  Rom.  17S2.  (Acta  blst  eoo.  nost  temp.  toL  IX.  p.  SSS. 
4i9!«.)  A.  F.  Biiuer,  Gesch.  d.  lieise  P.  YL  Vien.  1782a.  8  to1&  Walchy  nst  ReL  Oofleb.  voL  IX.  pi 
llSss.— Codex  J.  ecc  JoMpbinL  Frkf.  a.  L.  (Prsb.)  17S&  Jot.  IL  Briefe.  Lpa.  1S32.  {CaraeeioU^ 
La  vie  do  Jo».  Par.  1790.    Grms-Ifoffinget,  Ge»ch.  Jos.  Stuttg.  18S&.  8  vola. 

g)  JuHtini  Ffbronii  de  sUtu  Kcc  et  legitima  potestato  Rom.  PontiflcU  L.  ad  reanlendos  dtari^ 
denteA.  BullionL  (Frcf.)  1763-74.  4  voK  4.  and  often,  in  different  furma.  Commcntarlna  in  aaam  r^— 
IractaL  Frcf.  17SI.  4.  Watch,  nsL  Rcl.  Gesch.  vol.  L  p.  147.  VI,  171.  VII,  IW.  4M.  VIII,  5»«- 
Brlcfw.  zw.  d.  Kurt  v.  Trier  u.  N.  v.  Hontb.  u.  Febr.  Frlit  1818. 

7i)  Reaultato  d.  Emsor  Congr.  in  Actonst.  Frlid  a.  L.  1787.  4.    Pragm.  u.  actenm.  Goach.  d.  Nod- 
tlatur  in  Munclu  17S7.    8.  Dom.  Pii  VI.  ro^ionsio  ad  Metropolitanoa.  Rom.  17S9.    Paeca,  (Htmortt 
vol.  IV.)  hist  Dcnlcw.  Q.  a.  Aufenth.  in  Deutscb.  17S6-04.  from  the  ItaL  Angab.  188S.    K  «.  MineA, 
Qeach.  d.  Emaer  Congr.  Carlar.  l&4a 


CHAP.  IlL    CATHOLIC  CIIUECH  TILL  1S14    S  434  FEENCH  REVOLUTION.      529 

and  of  the  most  liberal  Jansenbjii  were  adopted,  all  Buperstitious  ceremonies 
were  abolished,  and  it  was  determined  that  public  worship  should  be  con- 
ducted in  the  language  of  the  people,  and  that  the  Scriptures  should  be  circu- 
lated among  them.  But  those  enactments  were  opposed  by  most  of  the  bish- 
ops in  Tuscany,  the  populace  in  Pistoia  stormed  the  episcopal  palace,  and 
when  Leopold  ascended  his  brother's  throne,  the  hierarchy  obtained  a  com- 
plete victory.  (/)  In  Naples^  the  convents  were  abolished,  the  prerogatives 
of  the  monarchy  were  enlarged,  and  the  feudal  tenure  of  the  pope  was  de- 
nied. The  controversy  on  these  subjects  was  finally  brouglit  to  a  compro- 
mise (1790),  in  which  it  was  agreed  that  the  feudal  relation  should  be  given 
up,  but  that  whenever  a  new  king  ascended  the  throne,  he  should  present  an 
otfering  to  St.  Peter  of  500,000  ducats.  (X) 

II.   The  FBEN'on  Revolution. 

Vollst,  Samml.  d.  Schrr,  selt.  Er.iffn.  d.  Relclist  Fr.  In  RQcks.  a.  d.  Cler.  (according  to  Barruel, 
CoL  Eccl.)  Kompt.  17956s.  4  xof^.—B'trnifl,  U.  dn  Clerge  en  France  pond.  la  rtW.  Lond.  1794.  1804. 
8  vola  J.  T.  DtUttc^  Pie  VI.  et  VIL  consldoros  dans  lours  rapports  avec  la  niv.  fran^  8.  Omer.  1889. 
Jitger^  II.  d.  Tegl.  dc  France  pendant  la  rov.  Par.  1852.  8  vols.  Com  p.  the  poL  histt  of  Mignet, 
TkUrm^  and  WachsmuiK,  liaum^r,  Dithlmann.  [all  of  which,  except  the  lost,  have  been  trausl.  into 
Engl  See  aim :  T.  CurlylA,  Michelet,  Lamartine  (QirondinsX  Alison,  and  Scott  (Life  of  Nap. 
Prelim.  Chap.)] 

§  434.     The  Xational  Assembly  (Constituent).     1789-1791. 
Planch^  ncueste  Bel.  Gesch.  1793.  vol  IIL 

The  Revolution  was  not  actually  occasioned  by  the  disorders  which  pre- 
vailed in  the  Church,  but  without  these  it  would  hardly  have  been  possible. 
The  superior  clergy  were  the  natural  allies  of  the  higher  nobility,  but  since 
even  the  court  was  obliged  to  demand  great  sacrifices  on  the  part  of  the 
Church,  the  electoral  law  was  so  contrived,  that  among  the  representatives 
of  the  ecclesiastical  estate  the  pastors  had  the  numerical  majority.    These, 
witli  TtiUeyrand^  the  Bishop  of  Autun,  who  never  failed  to  discover  on  which 
side  victory  was  about  to  turn,  at  their  head,  at  an  early  day  and  with  hon- 
est intentions  became  connected  with  the  third  estate.    There  was  a  philo- 
sophical party  which  had  entered  into  a  conspiracy  against  Chrislianity,  but 
It  had  no  idea  of  contending  against  the  faith  of  the  people.    Its  object  was 
to  destroy  the  hierarchy  only  as  a  political  power,  and  to  effect  the  deliver- 
ance of  the  state  by  the  weidth  of  the  Church.    The  very  central  point  of 
interest  at  the  national  festival  on  the  field  of  Mars  (Jnly  14, 1790)  was  a 
high  altar,  and  there  were  pious  Jansenists,  who  hoped  in  the  decrees  of  the 
national  a&sembly  to  realize  their  ideal  of  a  Church.    Such  were  the  honest 
Camufi^  who  wished  to  bring  every  thing  back  to  the  simplicity  of  apostolic 
times,  the  enthusiastic  Carthusian  Dom  Gerle,  who  vainly  demanded  that 
Catholicism  should  be  acknowledged  as  the  religion  of  the  state,  and  Gri- 
goire^  who,  confiding  in  the  democratic  humane  spirit  of  Christianity  even  in 


0  Acta  &jn.  Pistolens.  Tldn.  1790.  3  vols.  Planet,  vol,  L  pi  268.  II,  22988,  I>e  Potter,  Tie  et 
liiin.  de  RiccL  Par.  1828.  4  vols  Stutfg.  1S2G.  4  vols.  [Memoirs  of  Sdpio  de  Bicci,  Bp.  of  P.  and 
£e£  of  Gatb.  in  Tuscany.  Lond.  1852.  2  vols.  12.  j 

k)  IValchy  nst  BeL  Oesch.  vol.  Y.  \t.  5ss.    Planck^  vol.  L  p.  Sas. 

34 


530  MODERN  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  VL    A.  D.  ieia-185& 

the  time  of  the  most  sanguinary  outrages,  did  not  shrink  from  exposing  him- 
self to  derision  and  deadly  peril  in  hehalf  of  the  Church,  (a)    In  the  declara- 
tion of  human  rights,  which  constituted  the  new  gospel,  freedom  of  religions 
faith  was  proclaimed.    The  hierarchy,  determining  to  snhmit  with  dignity  to 
what  was  now  inevitable,  proposed  that  their  property  should  l)e  proportion- 
ally taxed,  and  that  all  superfluous  vessels  belonging  to  the  Church  should  be 
melted  down.    On  the  celebrated  night  of  the  4th  Aug.,  they  also  consented 
that  the  tithes  should  bo  discontinued,  and  the  pastors  agreed  that  the  sur- 
plice fees  should  be  renounced.    In  the  discussion  upon  the  law  relating  to 
these  subjects,  it  was  decided  that  the  tithes  should  be  abolished  as  soon  as 
the  staters  treasury  should  be  in  a  condition  to  sustain  the  expenses  of  pnUic 
worship.    All  ecclesiastical  property  was  declared  to  be  the  property  of  the 
nation  (Nov.  2d,  1789).     It  was  in  vain  that  Monte*quiev^  with  insinuating 
moderation,  and  Maury^  with  severe  argument,  urged  the  utt«r  futility  of 
this  proceeding  as  a  financial  speculation,  the  dilemmas  to  which  a  pecuniary 
salary  w^ould  reduce  the  clergy,  the  inviolability  of  this  kind  of  property,  and 
the  sacredness  of  such  (lious  institutions,  and  that  even  Sieyes  himself  warned 
the  deputies  that  if  men  would  be  free  they  must  be  just.    It  was  determined 
(Dec.  19tb)  that  two  hundred  millions  of  the  Church  property  should  be  sold, 
and  that  the  administration  of  every  thing  belonging  to  the  Church  should 
be  committed  to  the  secular  authorities  (April  14th,  179(f).    The  state  under- 
took, on  the  other  hand,  the  support  of  the  Church  and  of  the  poor.     A 
house  and  garden,  and  at  least  1200  livres,  were  secured  to  every  pastor. 
The  salaries  of  the  bishops  were  ample,  but  moderate  only  when  compared 
with  the  affluence  which  they  formerly  possessed.    All  sinecures  were  abol- 
ished.   Monastic  vows,  being  looked  upon  as  inconsistent  with  human  rights, 
and  not  needful  to  the  public  worship,  were  no  longer  protected  by  the  laws 
(Feb.  13th),  but  adequate  annuities  were  provided  for  those  who  belonged  to 
the  monasteries,  and  they  were  at  liberty  to  reside  in  the  convents.    The 
kingdom  was  divided  into  eighty-three  departments  of  equal  extent,  to  which 
the  Church  was  to  be  so  conformed  that  each  department  was  to  constitute  a 
bisliopric.    It  appeared  equally  consonant  with  primitive  Christianity  and 
the  newly-established  principles  of  freedom,  that  all  bishops  and  paston 
should  be  elected  by  the  people.     All  fears  of  evils  attending  a  popular  elec- 
tion which  was  not  even  then  directly  with  the  people,  were  answered  by 
appeals  to  the  disgraceful  concomitants  of  former  elections.     Every  bishop 
was  required  to  be  the  pastor  of  the  cathedral  church,  and  in  all  legal  mat- 
ters to  listen  to  the  counsel  of  his  vicars,  the  old  system  of  the  proviucia) 
synods  was  revived,  and  all  interference  from  neighboring  bishops  was  pro- 
hibited ;  still  the  unity  of  the  Church  and  its  connection  with  a  visible  uni- 
versal head  was  not  impaired.    The  party  of  the  bishops  solemnly  protested 
against  this  spoliation  of  the  Church,  and  this  derangement  of  the  episcopal 
jurisdictions  by  the  hands  of  the  civil  power.    To  destroy  their  opposition, 
it  was  decreed  (Nov.  27th)  that  all  ecclesiastical  officers,  nnder  penalty  of 
losing  their  offices,  should  take  an  oath  to  observe  these  laws  as  a  civil  <v»- 
■ 1 ~ 

a)  Mcmoires  de  Or.  pr6oM6s  d'une  notice  hist  snr  Tautear  ^k  M.  H.  Camot^  Par.  18S7.  9  rok 
O.  KHiger,  Or.  nach  s.  Dcuwiirdlgk.  Lpa.  188a 


CHAP.  IIL    CATHOLIC  CHURCH  TILL  1814    S  ^35.  OOBET.    ROBESPIEKRE.    531 

Mtitntum  of  the  clergy.  A  large  majority  of  the  clergy  refused  to  take  this 
oath  until  the  Church  should  declare  its  assent  to  the  laws.  Miraheau  lifted 
I^>  his  prophetic  voice,  predicting  that  the  selfishness  of  the  priests  would 
bring  down  ruin  upon  the  Churcli^  if  Catholic  France  was  induced  to  contend 
against  emancipated  France.  Some  bishops,  chosen  in  accordance  with  the 
teiins  of  the  new  law,  were  consecrated  (Feb.  24,  1791).  After  considerable 
delay,  Pirn  VL  declared  (April  13th)  that  the  oath  for  the  constitution  was 
inadmissible,  and  that  every  one  who  took  it  should  forfeit  his  office  in  the 
Church,  (t)  From  this  time  the  Catholic  Church  became  the  avowed  enemy 
of  the  revolution,  and  when  the  pastors  were  obliged  to  choose  between  the 
Church  and  their  native  land,  they  began  to  emigrate  to  foreign  countries. 
Avignon  was  declared  a  constituent  part  of  France  (Sept.  14th). 

§  485.     Legislative  Asseinbly  and  National  Convention.    1791—95, 

Origoir€^  vox  les  dlffaniAt^ars  et  pers^catears  dans  la  rel  Par.  S.  (1800.)    Oarrcn^  lea  ooDfeasenn 
de  la  foi  dam  IVgl  ga!L  ii  la  fin  da  18.  S.  Par.  1830.  4  vola. 

The  Legislative  Assembly  decreed  that  every  priest  who  refused  the  con- 
stitutional oath  should  be  .excluded  from  the  churches  and  deprived  of  his 
salary.  Those  who  excited  the  people  to  resistance  were  declared  subject  to 
banishment  or  impi^sonment.  The  king  refused  to  ratify  these  decrees  as 
long  as  it  was  in  his  power  to  do  so,  and  priests  who  had  not  taken  the  oath 
officiated  in  his  chapel.  Under  the  National  Convention,  when  France  was 
betrayed  by  priests  and  barons  into  the  hands  of  foreigners,  and  involved  in 
all  the  horrors  of  a  civil  war,  when  in  this  contest  every  venerable  usage 
was  annihilated,  when  the  sacrament  of  royalty  was  desecrated,  and  the  su- 
preme power  was  exercised  by  a  Parisian  mob,  Christianity  itself  was 
regarded  as  a  mere  usage  hostile  to  liberty,  and  the  doctrines  of  the  French 
philosophy  were  embraced  and  reduced  to  practice  by  the  populace  in  its  own 
way.  In  the  mean  time,  some  noble-minded  persons  like  the  Girondists  and 
Charlotte  Corday,  found  their  ideals  only  in  the  virtues  of  the  nncient  Ro- 
mans. A  new  mode  of  reckoning  time  was  introduced  (Oct.  6th,  1798),  all 
Christian  manners  and  mdrals  were  abolished  by  actual  legislation,  marriage 
was  treated  merely  as  a  civil  contract,  liable  to  dissolution  on  notice  by  one 
of  the  parties,  all  ecclesiastical  utensils  were  sold  as  national  property,  and  an 
idolatrous  worship  of  reason  was  solemnized,  in  which  venal  prostitutes  were 
the  priestessas  and  goddesses.  Gobet^  Bishop  of  Paris,  appeared  with  his 
priests  before  the  bar  of  the  Convention  (Nov.  7th),  to  declare  that  their 
previous  lives  had  been  a  deception.  The  existence  of  God  was  publicly 
denied,  his  vengeance  was  boldly  challenged,  and  above  the  cemeteries  the 
inscription  was  raised,  "  Death  is  an  eternal  sleep."  At  last,  Robavpierrt^ 
true  even  in  this  to  his  character,  and  believing  that  nothing  could  supply 
the  place  of  the  religious  feeling  in  the  hearts  of  the  people  as  a  safeguard 
for  all  civil  virtues,  induced  the  Convention  to  declare  that  the  French  na- 
lio.n  recognized  the  existence  of  a  Supreme  Being,  whose  highest  worship 
consisted  in  the  faithful  performance  of  relative  duties,  and  the  immortality 


h)  iffulct)  Col  Brevlam  et  Inatrr.  PU  YL  ad  praeflL  ealL  Me.  eaUmltatea  Aag.  17M  8  toIi. 


532  MODERN  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  VL    A.  D.  1643-1868. 

of  the  sonl.  In  honor  of  this  Snpremo  Being  an  absurd  national  festival  was 
celebrated  (July  8th,  1794).  After  the  subversion  of  the  reign  of  terror, 
liberty  for  the  exercise  of  all  kinds  of  religion  was  restored  (Feb.  21st,  1796), 
with  a  view  to  faVor  Christianity,  which  had  never  been  wholly  suppressed 
among  the  people,  especially  in  the  southern  provinces  of  France. 

§  43C.     The  Theophilanthropists.    1796-1802. 

Manuel  des  Tbdopb.  Par.  1797.  Ann6e  religlease  des  Th6oph.  (Recneil  des  dtsooan.)  Par.  1797. 
Grigoire,  Ge»ch.  d.  Tbeopli.  dbern  v.  Staudlin  in  a.  Mag.  toL  IV.  p.  2d7iw.  and  Hann.  \%H)t.  [Hist 
des  Sectes  rel.  Par.  1828.  6  vobk  8.  J.  EvanA,  Sketch  of  Cbr.  Denoin.  witb  an  Oatline  of  Athetem, 
Theophil.  Ac  15tb  cd.  Lond.  Amborst  1932.  12.] 

As  the  state  was  indiflferent  to  all  forms  of  religion,  and  the  Republican 
Directory  was  afraid  of  the  Christianity  which  prevailed  in  the  Church,  the 
increasing  consciousness  of  the  necessity  of  some  religion  led  many  to  adopt 
a  form  of  worship  adapted  to  a  natural  religion.  This  was  gradually  intro- 
duced into  ten  churches  of  Paris,  and  became  extended  into  most  of  the 
provinces.  God,  immortality,  morality,  and  the  ever-changing  life  of  nature, 
were  the  objects  of  this  system,  which,  as  it  was  never  sustained  by  any  vigor- 
ous religious  character,  was  soon  found  unable  t<T  cope  with  either  the  Chria- 
tianity  or  the  spirit  of  indifference  which  existed  in  society.  Hence,  after  a 
brief  period  of  success,  when  the  First  Consul  declared  that  this  mode  of 
worship  could  no  longer  be  tolerated  in  the  churches  b^onging  to  the  nation, 
it  was  ridiculed  by  the  public  and  entirely  discontinued. 

§  487.     The  Roman  Republic.     Cont.  from  §  433. 

Every  kind  of  influence  had  been  brought  into  requisition  by  Pius  VI.,  to 
foster  by  religious  fanaticism  the  flame  of  civil  war  in  France.     BuonaparU, 
who  had  become  master  of  Italy  by  the  complete  destruction  of  the  Austrian 
army,  demanded  that  the  pope  should  annul  all  his  decrees  against  France. 
When  the  latter  refused,  and  ventured  to  make  preparations  for  resistance, 
the  French  republican  general  threw  himself  upon  the  States  of  the  Church. 
At  Tolenthio  (Feb.  19,  1797),  a  treaty  of  peace  was  obtained  at  the  expense 
of  all  the  possessions  of  the  Roman  court  in  France,  of  its  legations  in  Fer- 
rara,  Bologna,  and  Romagna,  of  thirty  millions  of  francs,  and  of  an  immense 
selection  from  the  Roman  treasures  of  art.    A  republican  form  of  govern- 
ment was  bestowed  upon  Lombardy.    Even  in  Rome  a  party  was  formed  in 
fiivor  of  a  republic.    When  a  popular  insurrection  with  this  object  in  view 
took  place  in  the  city,  and  a  French  general  had  been  killed  in  the  fray,  Ber- 
thier  was  sent  into  the  states  of  the  Church  to  obtain  satisfaction  from  the 
government.    Under  the  protection  of  his  arms  a  Roman  republic  was  formed, 
and  the  pope  was  informed  that  his  civil  authority  was  at  an  end  (Feb.,  1798). 
The  sympathy  generally  expressed  for  the  misfortunes  of  the  citizen  pope 
made  him  an  object  of  suspicion,  and  led  to  his  removal  from  Rome.    Unallj 
this  mild  and  devout  pontiff  died  a  French  prisoner  at  Valence  (Aug.  29th, 
1799).* 


*  Baldauari^  Hist  de  renldvement  el  de  la  captivito  de  Pie  TL,  trad,  de  Tltalien  p^  ds  Laccu- 
ture.  Par.  184a  A.  d.  Fr.  v.  X.  Stsck,  Tftb.  1844. 


CHAP.  IIL    CATHOLIC  CHURCH  TILL  1814.    %  438.  PIUS  VIL    NAPOLEON  L    533 


m.  The  Era  of  Napolkox. 
§  488.     Pitts  VII.  and  the  He  establishment  of  the  Qalliean  Church, 

Stori»  dl  Plo  VIL  (with  orig.  docc)  Ven.  1815.  2  vols.  Simon,  Vio  polit  et  prlv6e  de  Pio  VIL 
Par.  18i3.  Gnad^t,  EiiquiaMS  hist  et  polit  Bur  Pie  VII.  Par.  1S24.  Jdger,  L^  P.  VIL  in.  Urk. 
Frkf.  1S24  Artatul  ds  Montor,  H.  du  Pape  P.  VII.  Par.  18868.  2  v.>l«.  ed.  8^ar.  1889.  8  vols.— 
(Capnira)  Conconlat  entre  1«  Gouvernemcnt  franr.  et  le  Pape.  Par.  1S02.  Cologne,  1802.  ReinhHT'l^ 
Dene  Organla.  d.  Rel.  Wes.  In  Fr.  CoL  1S02.  Bttrnul^  da  Pape  et  de  ses  droits  rel.  k  Toccaa.  du  Con- 
cord. Par.  1808.  2  toIa. 

Pius  VIL  (Chiaramonti)  was  elected  pope  at  Venice  (March  14,  1800), 
Qoder  the  protection  of  Austria.  By  his  apparent  concession  to  the  revolu- 
tion (a)  while  he  was  Bishop  of  Iraola,  he  had  shown  himself  Ti  man  of  a 
crafty  and  ohstinate  spirit.  Under  the  armed  escort  of  the  allied  powers  he 
was  brought  to  Rome  (July  3d),  whore  he  was  by  the  treiity  of  Luneville  put 
in  possession  of  the  States  of  the  Church,  but  without  the  legations  (1801). 
He  now  turned  his  attention  to  the  work  of  healing  the  wounds  inflicted  by 
the  revolution.  Napoleon  was  at  that  time  convinced  that  the  true  end  of 
fill  his  victories  was  to  secure  the  liberties  of  the  country  by  the  establish- 
ment of  order,  and  to  frustrate  the  consi)iracies  formed  against  them  in 
Europe  by  extending  them  throughout  the  continent  by  wars  of  conquest. 
Though  personally  perhaps  indifferent  toward  all  churches,  he  saw  that  it 
was  indispensable  to  the  tranquillity  of  the  country  that  Catholicism  should 
be  re-established  as  the  religion  of  the  state.  For  the  revolution  had  dis- 
tinctly shown,  that  even  after  a  nation  has  broken  all  bonds,  it  cannot  exist 
without  a  God ;  and  from  the  sea  of  blood  into  which  the  innocent  and  the 
guilty  had  alike  been  plunged,  the  recollection  of  the  Church  of  their  fa- 
thers emerged  like  the  dawn  of  a  brighter  day.  Hence,  when  the  aims  of  the 
future  emperor  were  not  satisfied  at  a  national  synod  at  Paris,  of  those  bish- 
ops who  had  taken  the  oath,  a  Concordat  w^as  agreed  upon  (July  15,  1801), 
after  mutual  concessions,  with  the  papal  minister  Consahi,  Its  stipulations 
were :  Catholicism  is  the  religion  of  the  majority  of  the  French  nation  ;  the 
property  of  the  Church  shall  not  be  restored,  but  the  state  undertakes  to 
Bustain  the  Church  by  a  suitable  and  ample  provision ;  all  priests  who  have 
taken  the  constitutional  oath,  as  well  as  those  who  have  emigrated,  shall 
resign  their  offices,  but  be  eligible  for  a  re-election ;  a  division  of  dioceses, 
conformed  indeed  to  the  political  departments,  but  having  reference  to  the 
old  bishop's  sees,  shall  be  made ;  the  first  consul  shall  appoint  the  archbish- 
ops and  fifty  bishops  in  France,  but  the  pope  alone  shall  have  the  power  of 
bestowing  upon  them  a  canonical  confirmation;  the  pastors  shall  be  ap- 
pointed by  the  bishops ;  the  first  consul  shall  possess  the  same  prerogatives 
as  were  possessed  by  the  former  government ;  and  the  pope  shall  be  the  tem- 
poral sovereign  of  the  Ecclesiastical  States,  and  the  head  of  the  Church.  In 
addition  to 'these  stipulations,  Napoleon  enacted  by  organic  laws:  the  pro- 
clamation of  papal  decrees  depends  upon  the  discretion  of  the  government ; 
there  shall  always  be  an  opportunity  for  an  appeal  to  the  council  of  state 
against  the  abuses  of  ecclesiastical  power;  the  teachers  in  the  seminaries 


a)  HoroeHe  da  cltoyen  Card.  Chiaramonti,  1797,  trad,  de  I'ltaL  par  Origoire,  Par.  (1614)  1S1& 


534  MODERN  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  YL    A.  D.  1«43-189& 

shall  be  bonnd  by  the  four  propositions  of  the  Gallioan  clergy ;  and  marriage 
ceremonies  shall  be  performed  by  the  priests  only  after  a  previous  act  of  the 
civil  authorities.  The  intro<luction  of  the  Concordat  was  solenmized  on  the 
Easter  festival  of  1802.  The  Democrats  and  the  old  companions  in  arms  of 
the  first  consujp ridiculed  the  new  capucinade.  But  even  while  the  work  of 
destruction  had  been  J?oing  on,  St.  Martin  (d.  1804)  had  borne  witness  to  the 
mysteries  of  the  human  heart,  and  its  aspirations  after  a  Grod,  who  ooold 
alleviate  the  disorders  of  the  head,  even  after  Christ  had  healed  the  distress 
of  the  heart  of  our  race.  lie  however  labored  only  for  certain  iniUated  per- 
sons, leaving  the  Church  to  an  inferior  kind  of  prescriptions.  (i»)  OhateaU' 
hriand  (d.  1848),  in  the  midst  of  the  sorrows  of  the  revolution,  had  found 
the  Christianity  which  he  had  previously  lost,  and  with  many  tears  he  now 
believed.  In  the  primitive  American  forests,  under  the  Grecian  sky,  and  at 
the  holy  sepnl  :hre,  he  extolled  the  beauties  of  Christianity,  and  what  it  had 
accomplislied  for  humanity.  Ilis  inner  life  continued  subject  to  the  alterna- 
tions of  doubt  and  faith,  and  the  faith  which  he  possessed  was  always  artifi- 
cially excited,  and  tricked  out  with  the  tinsel  of  a  worldly  vanity ;  but  even 
amid  the  ruins  of  the  temples,  his  Genius  of  Christianity  appears  as  a  long- 
forgotten  spiritual  reality,  and  a  new  glorification  of  an  awakening  as  well  as 
a  witnessing  Catholicism,  (c)  Even  Napoleon  perceived  that  the  imperial 
crown  he  was  placing  upon  a  head  already  crowned  by  fame,  would  be  more 
firmly  fixed  were  it  consecrated  by  the  pope,  and  accordingly  he  became  one 
of  the  Lord's  anointed  (Dec.  2d,  1804).  The  Catechism  designed  for  the 
youth  of  France,  (//)  enumerated  devotion  to  the  emperor  among  the  divine 
commandments,  and  it  was  in  fact  the  religion  of  young  France. 

§  439.     Dispute  between  the  Emperor  and  the  Pope. 

&  Schoell,  RcciKil  doM  pieces  offlcielles.  Par.  1S15.  Pii^ces  hist  relstiv«e  k  PSe  YIL  Par.  1S14 
(Arcliiv.  f  KOesch.  vol.  II.  p.  172.  4Od0s.)  Correspondance  de  la  ooiir  do  Rome  avecia  France.  Par. 
1S14.  Beauchamp,  11.  dcs  malhours  de  Pfe  VII.  Par.  1814  Rotation  aath.  de  renl^vcment  da  P. 
Pin  VI I.  de  rital.  p.  Ltmierre  (TArgy,  Par.  1814  Metnorie  del  Card.  Pacea^  Onrieto.  \tS2S.  ed  & 
1883.  1-3  vols.    [Notes  on  Uie  Mlni-^try  of  Card.  B.  Paced,  Sec  of  State  to  P.  YIL  DmR  1SI&  &) 

It  was  in  vain  that  the  pope  demanded,  as  the  price  of  his  obedience,  that 
the  Church  in  France  should  be  entirely  under  his  control,  and  complained  of 
the  violation  of  the  Concordat  by  the  organic  laws,  and  of  the  infringement  of 
the  canonical  laws  by  the  Code  Napoleon.  That  he  might  cope  with  the  superior 
power  of  France,  he  formed  a  league  with  the  enemies  of  the  emperor,  and  pre- 
vented the  union  of  all  Italy  for  common  measures  against  Austria  and  Eng- 
land.   Tliis  induced  the  emperor  to  send  troops  to  take  possession  of  the 

h)  Des  errears  et  de  la  v6rtt6. 1775.  Edinb.  1782.  2  vols.  L^omme  do  dealr.  Lyon.  1790.  Em* 
hotna  Par.  1792.  Lps.  1S19.  De  Tesprit  des  cbosee.  Par.  1800.  2  vola.  Oeavree  ]M8Ui«mc&  lV>on 
1807.  2  volsw  comp.  Vamhaffen,  Denkw.  LpB.  1840.  vol.  Y.  p.  126. 191ae.  • 

c)  Atala  ou  les  amours  de  deux  saiivages.  Par.  X.  (tSOl.)  Le  G^ie  da  Chriatianiame  oa  bcaato 
de  la  rel.  chr.  Par.  1802.  5  vols.  Les  martyrs.  Par.  1809.  8  vol^  Itln^raire  de  Paris  4  JerosaL  Ptf. 
181 1.  8  voK  Oeuvres.  Par.  1830.  22  vols.  Mcmoires  d'oatre-tombe.  Par.  184a  (BerL  lS4SaB.)  li  roll 
[The  Gen.  of  Chr.,  The  Martyrs,  The  Itinerary  to  Jertis.,  Congress  of  Yerona,  his  Memoirs  ty  him- 
self. Sketches  of  Eng.  Lit.  and  various  other  works  ijf  C.  have  been  transl.  into  Engl  and  pubL  In 
Lond.  1846'&0.    His  Kecollections  of  Italy,  Engl,  and  Amer.  were  transl.  and  pabL  Philad.  181&  &] 

d)  Catech.  k  Tusago  de  toutca  les  6gL  de  Tcmpire;  Par.  1806. 


CHAP.  IIL    CATHOLIC  GUDRCH  TILL  1814.    S  ^^  PIUS  VIL    NAPOLEON  L    535 

States  of  the  Church  (Feb.,  1808),  and  after  many  acts  of  violenco  to  declare 
that  the  donations  of  his  predecessor,  the  Emperor  Charles,  were  tlien  re- 
voked on  account  of  thd  abuse  which  had  been  made  of  them  (May  l7th, 
1809).  He  however  allowed  the  pope,  as  the  supreme  head  of  the  Catholic 
Church,  to  have  possession  of  all  domains  belonging  to  the  Roman  Curia,  of 
a  palace  in  Paris,  and  of  two  millions  of  yearly  revenues.  Pius  VII.  rejected 
every  offer  of  a  salary  as  an  insult,  depended  for  his  support  entirely  upon 
the  alms  of  the  Mthfnl,  and  declared  every  one  who  laid  his  hand  upon  the 
patrimony  of  St.  Peter,  excommunicated  from  the  Church.  He  was  then 
arrested  (July  6th),  taken  to  6avona,  where  he  opposed  to  the  prayers  as  well 
as  the  threats  of  the  emperor  an  inflexible  resignation,  which  could  do  noth- 
ing while  he  was  not  at  liberty,  and  while  deprived  of  the  counsel  of  his  car- 
dinals. He  also  refused  to  confirm  those  who  had  been  appointed  bishop^. 
Jh  connection  with  the  Cardinal  Maury ^  then  Archbishop  of  Paris,  who 
thought  an  honest  reconciliation  of  the  Church  with  him  into  whoso  hand 
God  seemed  to  have  given  the  world  was  absolutely  indispensable,  (a)  Napo- 
leon now  attempted,  by  means  of  a  synod  at  Paris  (1811),  to  render  the  im- 
perial Church  independent  of  the  pope.  The  bishops,  however,  perceived 
that  their  own  protection  against  the  arbitrary  power  of  the  emperor  was  to 
be  found  in  the  obstinacy  which  the  pope  then  maintained,  and  the  synod 
was  therefore  dissolved,  {b)  As  far  as  the  sovereignty  of  France  extended  in 
the  Spanish  and  Italian  peninsulas,  most  of  the  convents,  together  with  the 
inquisition,  were  abolished,  the  property  of  the  Church  was  confiscated,  and 
the  liberal  form  of  the  Gallican  Church  was  introduced.  It  was  for  this  rea- 
son that  the  Spanish  clergy  placed  themselves  at  the  head  of  the  national 
movement  in  which  the  first  resistance  was  made  against  the  emperor,  and 
that  they  might  gain  their  point,  they  took  part  with  the  advocates  of  a  lib- 
eral Constitution,  and  with  England.  The  same  reason  induced  Cardinal 
Buffo  (d.  1827),  among  the  southern  peaks  of  the  Apennines,  to  bestow  his 
blessing  upon  the  arms  of  the  robbers.  After  his  misfortunes  in  Kussia, 
Napoleon  was  obliged  once  more  to  pay  some  deference  to  public  opinion. 
He  then  gained  the  heart  of  the  pope,  and  concluded  (Jan.  25th,  1813)  a  Con- 
cordat at  Foutainthleauy  by  which  the  investiture  of  bishops  was  made  no  longer 
dependent  on  the  arbitrary  papal  will,  and  in  which  nothing  was  said  of  the 
temporal  government  of  the  pope.  It  was  not  long,  however,  before  the 
heart  of  the  holy  Father  was  seized  by  a  paroxysm  of  deep  despondency  on 
account  of  this  surrender  of  his  last  weapon,  and  following  the  counsel  of  the 
liberated  cardinals,  he  revoked  all  that  he  had  done.  On  the  very  next  day 
(March  25th),  the  emperor  published  the  Concordat  as  a  law  of  the  empire. 
But  the  nationalities  which  had  been  destroyed  by  liim  now  rose  up  against 
him,  and  this  military  prince  began  to  totter  from  hb  eminence.  Then  it 
was  that  he  concluded  to  liberate  the  pope,  and  restore  to  him  the  possession 
of  the  states  of  the  Church. 


a)  From  the  Life  of  Maor.  by  his  Nephew.  (Stod.  n.  Krit  1831.  P.  &  p.  663ss.) 
h)  MelcAer$j  Nationalconc.  zu  Paris  m.  Actcnst  Munich.  1814. 


536  MODERN  CHURGH  HISTORY.    PER.  YL    A.  D.  1M8-1868L 

§  440.     Ocerthrow  of  the  German  Ecclesiastical  Constitution. 

Martent^  Rfcaeil  des  princ.  trait6a.  vol  YII.  {k  6886S.  SuppL  vol  III.  p.  S4d8iL  Reicbsd«pntatioM- 
HaQptscliL  ed.  by  Cumtnfrer,  Ratisb.  1S04.  4.  GuBjtari,  d.  K.  D.  Rece«0  m.  Erliiutr.  Hmb.  180&  % 
Tols.— /TiirZ,  DeiiU'chl.  n»t  Stuate-  u.  K.  Verinder.  Brl.  1804.  Planck,  Betr.  0.  d.  nst  Ver.indr.  d. 
kath.  K.  Hann.  ISOa  {Paulm)  Beitir.  z.  Gesch.  d.  kath.  K.  im  19.  Jalirh.  Ueklelb.  (ISIS.)  182&. 
Kopp^  d.  kath.  K.  im  19.  JUb.  Mayenoe,  1880. 

» 

The  ecclesiastical  Electorates,  which  had  been  places  of  rendezroDS  for 
the  emigrants,  and  for  all  who  wished  to  devise  intrignes  against  France, 
were  swallowed  up  in  the  republic,  and  by  the  Peace  of  Luneville  (1801)  the 
left  bank  of  the  Rhine  was  ceded  to  France.  The  secular  princes,  who 
were  losers  by  this  arrangement,  or  who  for  other  reasons  had  found  favor  at 
Paris,  were  indemnified  by  the  gift  of  territories  belonging  to  the  Church. 
To  accomplish  this,  the  ecclesiastical  principalities  and  charitable  foundations 
were  secularized  by  a  recess  of  the  imperial  deputies  (1808).  Dalherg^  the 
electoral  arch-chancellor,  who  enjoyed  the  esteem  of  the  conqueror  for  his 
pliancy,  of  the  German  people  for  his  goodness  of  heart,  and  of  artists  and 
learned  men  for  his  sympathy  with  them  in  their  studies,  and  his  freedom 
from  all  petty  cx)n8i derations,  was  the  only  one  who  maintained  his  elevated 
ecclesiastical  and  political  position ;  and  in  his  episcopal  see  at  Ratisbon,  to 
which  the  metropolitan  rights  of  Mentz  had  been  transferred  (1805),  he  en- 
deavored to  reconcile  the  Church  with  the  spirit  of  the  new  age.  After  the 
papacy  had  been  secularized,  Napole<^n  declared  (1810)  (o)  that  the  princi- 
pality belonging  to  it  possessed  only  a  secular  and  personal  character. 
Although  the  nobility  were  more  affected  by  the  loss  than  Catholicism,  yet 
the  Church  was  in  these  various  ways  obliged  to  expiate  the  offences  of  the 
empire.  It  was  however  obvious  that  the  ecclesiastical  constitution  was  dis- 
solved. Tlie  dioceses  had  been  dismembered,  the  chapters  and  convents  had 
been  abolished,  the  ecclesiastical  princes  of  the  empire  had  even  thrown  away  the 
crosier,  Protestant  princes  claiming  to  be  the  heirs  of  the  bishops  had  nsuiped 
the  right  of  patronage,  bishops  were  not  appointed  to  vacant  offices,  nor  were 
the  dioceses  re-organized,  and  finally,  with  the  quiet  subversion  of  the  holy 
Roman  empire,  there  were  no  more  securities  for  the  laws  of  the  empire.  In 
this  way  the  ecclesiastical  constitution  was  completely  terminated.  Even  in 
Bavaria  (since  1799),  the  spirit  of  Illuminism  destroyed  the  monasteries,  and 
induced  the  government  to  issue  enactments  against  every  thing  it  regarded 
as  superstition.  (/>)  In  consequence  of  the  extravagant  claims  set  up  by  each 
party,  all  negotiations  between  the  princes  of  Southern  Germany  and  the 
Roman  court,  which  always  insisted  that  heretical  princes,  instead  of  gaining 
ecclesiastical  property,  should  lose  their  own,  (c)  were  utterly  fruitless,  and 
provisional  ecclesiastical  governments  were  formed  according  to  the  spirit  of 
the  civil  authoriti^. 


a)  {Dalherg)  Dc  la  paix  de  T^Iise  dans  les  6tats  de  la  conf&ddratlon  rb^nane.  Fre£  ISlflL  BadiK 
1810.    A.  Kramer,  Karl  Theod.  Dalb.  Lpa.  1821.    Dalberg.  Die  letxten  LebeosUgtt  c  dratacktf 
Bischof^  by  //.  M.  E.  Carler.  1846.    Liter  Nacblaas  d.  Frsu  t.  Wolzogeo.  vol.  IL  p.  66iL 
6)  Ihnkei  Kel.  Ann.  vol.  I.  p.  127.  II,  20l8«.  A.  Z.  1808.  N.  258, 1804.  N.  15L 
c)  InstwictioDB  to  the  Nuntiua,  in  Vienna,  in  Pav/tM,  Beitrr.  1828.  p.  87. 


CHAP.  IV.    BYANG.  CHUBCH  TILL  1814.     %UL  BEIMAKUS.    BAHRDT.       537 

CHAP.  IV.— THE  PROTESTANT  EVANGELICAL   CHURCH   UNTIL 

1814. 

§  441.     Th^  Age  of  Enliglitenment.     Cont,  from  §  416,  430. 

{G.  U.  Braatberger)  Erzahl.  u.  Beurth.  d.  Veraodr.  d.  Lebrbeg.  d.  Prot  In  Deutsclil.  Hal  1790. 
J.  A.  IT.  nttmann,  pragm.  Oe»ch.  d.  chr.  R.  u.  Th.  In  d.  prot  K.  2  Hiilfle  des  18.  Jahrh.  Brsl.  1805. 
(New  Title)  Lp«^  1824.  only  1  vol.  Ote»«Ur,  RQckbl.  a.  d.  klrchl.  u.  th.  Rioht  n.  Entw.  d.  letztf  n  50 
J.  Qott  1887.  TkUuek^  AbrisB  e.  GeMh.  d.  Umwalzang  8l  1750.  a.  d.  Oebiete  d.  Th.  In  DeutschL 
(Verm.  Schrr.  Hal  1889.  vol  XL)    [ITagenbacA  (J  416.)  vol.  L  Vorleaa.  11-17.  vol.  II,  1-9.] 

The  same  spirit  which  was  in  other  places  breaking  loose  from  all  re- 
straints, attempted  in  Germany  to  overthrow  Christianity.  Tlie  Wolfenbflttel 
Fragments,  originally  composed  by  Reimarui  (d.  1768)  for  himself  and  a  few 
friends  in  a  town  zealous  for  ancestral  usages,  and  edited  by  Lessing,  con- 
tended with  much  intellectual  acuteness  against  the  habit  of  decrying  reason 
which  prevailed  in  the  pulpit,  and  against  the  possibility  of  a  revelation 
which  should  possess  sufficient  evidence  to  render  it  worthy  of  universal  con*- 
fidence,  and  represented  the  undertaking  of  Jesus  as  an  unsuccessful  attempt 
at  an  insurrection  which  finally  gained  credit  by  a  pretended  resurrection,  (a) 
Among  other  decisive  conclusions  respecting  Christianity,  Mavtillon  put 
forth  one  in  which  not  only  its  divine  origin,  but  even  the  moral  principles 
of  the  gospel  were  assailed.  (&)  Bahrdt  (1741-92),  always  clever  and  light- 
minded  not  only  in  his  scientific  pursuits  but  in  his  daily  life,  having  gradu- 
ally broken  loose  from  the  restraints  of  the  ecclesiastical  creed,  endeavored 
by  strange  fancies  sometimes  to  destroy  the  Scriptural  history,  and  sometimes 
to  make  it  harmonize  with  the  views  and  sentimentality  of  the  age  by  repre- 
senting Socrates,  Jesus,  Semler,  and  himself,  as  equally  the  instruments  of  divine 
providence,  (c)  He  addressed  himself  to  the  common  people ;  others  en- 
deavored to  move  the  middle  classes  of  society ;  the  higher  classes  had  im- 
bibed the  same  spirit  in  a  more  ingenious  form  from  France ;  while  those  who 
were  intellectually  of  a  still  higher  order,  though  they  looked  from  a  position 
of  an  entirely  secular  character,  regarded  the  efforts  of  these  modern  Titans 
with  derision  and  mockeries.  This  merely  destructive  school  was  not  over- 
come by  the  numerous  replies  its  productions  called  forth,  nor  by  the  petty 
persecution  to  which  its  adherents  were  subjected,  but  by  the  free  develop- 
ment of  German  theology.  German  literature,  with  some  respect  for  the 
blessings  of  Christianity  and  what  were  called  tlie  dreams  of  its  youthful 
days,  prosecuted  the  discovery  that  the  doctrine  of  the  Church  was  perhaps 
different  in  important  respects  from  that  of  primitive  Christianity,  and 
indulged  the  expectation  that  when  theology  should  be  properly  developed, 


a)  [K.  JTaM^'\  Leben  Jeso.  p.  81.  (ZQr.  Gflscb.  n.  Lit.  a.  d.  Sohitzen  d.  Wolf.  BIbl.  Beltr.  8.  4. 
WoUenbw  1777.)  Fragm.  d.  Wold  Ungenannten,  hr»g.  v.  Lenlng,  4  ed.  BrL  1885.  t^election  of  all 
Important  papers  fh>in  the  Hamburg  MSS. :  Apologie  o.  Schutzsch.  fur  die  Vem&nft  Ycrebrer  Oottes 
V.  H.  S.  Reim.  ed.  by  W.  Klof.  (Zeitsch.  f.  biAt  Th.  1850.  U.  4.  1651.  IL  4. 1852.  IL  8.) 

h)  Das  einzig  wahre  System  d.  chr.  R«l.  BrL  1787. 

c)  [A".  //<(«<•,]  Leben  Jesu.  p.  81.  K.  F.  Bahrdt,  Glaubensbok.  Hal  1779.  K.  n.  Ketzer-Alm*- 
sacb  for  1761.  Hireeiopel.  Gesch.  b.  Leben^  by  hlmselC  BrL  17908.  4  vols.  ^It  Bericbtgg.  v.  Vot- 
land^  Jen.  1791.  Q.  Laudthard,  Ilal.  1761.  Briefe  anges.  Gelehrten,  BtaatsmtLnner  u.  a.  an  den  b«* 
r(U)mt«n  M&rtyrer  Bahrdt  Lps.  1791.  5  vola. 


538  MODEBN  CHURCH  HISTORY.    FEB.  VL    A.  D.  164a-186& 

it  would  be  consistent  with  the  dictates  of  a  matnre  reason.  HiehaelU 
(1719-91),  from  the  Orphan  honse,  with  BOine  assistance  from  England,  pre- 
sented an  historical  estimate  of  the  original  text  of  the  sacred  Scriptures,  and 
inter]>r6ted  the  Old  Testament  bj  T>riental  illustrations,  and  the  Mosaic  laws 
by  the  principles  of  Montesquieu.  His  diffuse  and  easy  style  was  very  agree* 
able  to  the  Germans ;  in  his  best  days  he  had  the  reputation  of  being  an 
innovator,  thou{]^h  when  an  old  man  he  was  considerably  behind  his  age,  and 
he  himself,  without  moral  courage,  assures  us  that  he  always  conformed  his 
instructions  to  the  doctrines  of  the  Church,  (d)  Eme»ti  (1707-81)  applied 
the  results  of  classical  philology  to  the  settlement  of  more  precise  rules  for 
the  interpretation  of  the  Scriptures,  to  which  he  once  more  conducted  the 
creed  of  the  Church,  {e)  Sender  (1725-91),  who  had  by  extreme  diligence 
advanced  from  the  pietistic  and  contracted  spirit  of  his  youth,  when  he  ex- 
hibited neither  fancy  nor  genius,  to  a  maturity  in  which  he  displayed  im- 
mense treasures  of  an  independent,  but  irregular  and  undigested  knowledge, 
presented  various  examples  fortified  by  all  the  weight  of  the  original  histori- 
cal documents,  of  the  misunderstandings,  the  delusions,  and  violence  in  which 
he  thought  the  doctrines  of  the  Church  in  many  instances  had  originated. 
In  his  estimation,  the  Bible  was  full  of  many  minor  ideas  peculiar  to  the 
places  in  which  it  was  written,  and  he  seemed  to  think  it  was  proper  to  admit 
any  doctrine  into  it  which  might  serve  to  improve  the  morals  of  men.  He 
never  imagined  that  he  was  doing  any  thing  calculated  to  produce  a  revolu- 
tion, and  he  was  pervaded  by  the  pious  feelings  which  formed  the  habit  of 
his  youth.  Hence,  when  the  very  system  for  which  he  had  contended  and 
suffered  became  triumphant  (1779),  and  he  saw  how  far  beyond  aU  bounds 
it  was  carried  by  Bahrdt,  he  was  alarmed  at  his  own  course,  and  came  into 
conflict  with  the  very  spirit  of  the  age  which  he  had  done  so  much  to  pro- 
duce. For  in  his  subsequent  works  he  maintained  that  in  public  the  doctrines 
of  the  Church  were  to  be  absolutely  npheld,  although  in  private  each  one 
was  to  be  allowed  full  freedom  in  his  religious  views,  {f)  Frederic  11^  the 
German  hero  with  a  French  education,  who  would  have  nothing  to  do  with 
the  Christian  faith,  although  he  was  not  without  some  regard  for  Christian 
morality,  for  the  strength  of  religious  feelings,  for  Protestantism  as  the  reli- 
gion of  his  country,  and  for  every  individual  of  ability  in  the  Church,  de- 
spised every  thing  like  priestcraft,  gave  all  the  influence  of  his  great  name  to 
those  who  were  opposing  the  doctrines  of  the  Church,  and  allowed  every  one 
full  liberty  to  be  saved  after  his  own  fa^on.  (g)     The  General   Gernum 

d)  Eichhorn,  J.  D.  Mich.  (Allfr.  Bibl.  d.  bibl.  Lit  1799.  v.  IIL  p.  8278S.)  Lebensbeechr.  von  ibm 
s«1b5t  m.  Anm.  v.  Ilaaaenkamp^  Rint  &  L.  1798.  [Introd.  to  the  N.  T.  from  the  Qerin.  of  J.  D.  Mich. 
by  AfarsK  Lund.  181S.  6  vuls.  Comment,  on  the  Laws  of  Moses,  transl.  ttom  the  Germ,  of  J.  D.  Mich, 
by  Smith,  Lond.  4  vols,  a   EichKom'»  Life  and  Writings  of  J.  D.  M.  has  been  transL  Edinb.  ISaS.  1&] 

<j)  A.  Ti'lUr,  Ern.  Verdienste  um  Th.  u.  Eel.  Lps.  1783.    SamUr,  Zna.  in  Toller.  Hal.  1788.    J.  r. 
Vor»t,  Or.  do  Ern.  optimo  post  Qrotium  duce  interpretnm  N.  T.  Lngd.  B.  1804.  4.    [Smmti,  Be- 
inent*  of  Interp.  tranal.,  with  Notes  and  App.  by  M.  Stuart,  Andover,  1827.  12.] 

/)  Lf'bensbeschr.  von  ihm  selbst.  Hal.  17818.  2  vols.  Niemeyer^  S.  letzte  Aenssemngen.  HaL  1791. 
EichJwrn,  Sonil  (Allg.  Bibl.  1793.  vol.  V.) 

g)  Preiunt,  Fr.  d.  O.  Brl.  1S828S.  6  vols.  F.  v.  Raumer :  Yt.  IL  n.  8.  Zeit  (Beltrr.  i  mb 
Oesct).  Lp9.  1R36.  v.  IL)  Redcn  z.  GedacbtnissC  Fr.  IL  Lpai  1818.  &  1847.  J.  a  JohannmK  Fr.  d 
G.  Bel  u.  Toler.  (ZeltscU.  £  hist  Th.  1849.  U.  1.)    [£  MoriaHy,  H.  of  Fr.  Tb«oL  Lond.  ft  rhitod. 


CHAP.  IT.    EVANO.  CHURCH  TILL  1814.    f  44S.  BEACTIOX.  539 

Library,  which  under  N^icolai,  during  the  first  ten  years  of  its  publication 
(after  1765),  exercised  an  absolute  sway  as  a  tribunal  of  literature,  always 
exerted  its  secret  influence  in  opposition  to  the  ancient  system  of  faith,  (h) 
and  rejected  every  thing  which  exceeded  the  limits  of  its  own  bald  intelli- 
gence and  morality,  on  the  ground  of  a  liability  either  to  the  reproach  of  su- 
perstition or  the  suspicion  of  Jesuitism.  (/)  It  professed  to  regard  Christian- 
ity only  as  an  historical  development  of  natural  morality  and  religion,  and  a 
popular  system  of  instruction  in  the  best  way  to  become  happy  in  this  world 
and  the  next.  In  consequence  of  the  power  possessed  by  the  opposition 
among  the  influential  classes,  and  its  continued  adherence  to  the  general  basis 
of  Christianity,  it  would  neither  be  discarded  as  a  heresy,  nor  attempt  to  set 
up  a  peculiar  Church  of  its  own,  but  on  the  principles  of  Protestantism  it 
was  looked  upon  as  simply  one  among  many  theological  views,  and  as  hetero- 
doxy by  the  side  of  orthodoxy.  Besides,  the  sacred  Scriptures  were  -upheld 
by  it  in  opposition  to  the  fallible  doctrine  of  the  Church,  although  the  de- 
velopment of  the  experimental  sciences  made  many  doubt  whether  the  whgle 
of  the  sacred  text  could  be  the  immediate  word  of  God.  Enlightenment,  by 
which  was  meant  an  elevation  above  the  childish  prejudices  of  education  by 
a  courage  which  induces  one  to  rely  upon  his  own  understanding,  now  be- 
came the  watchword  of  the  age,  (k)  and  Germany  once  more  saw  its  sanc- 
tuary of  faith  torn  down  by  the  hands  of  its  own  priests. 

§  442.     Christian  Reaction.    Prussian  Religious  Edict. 

Societies  were  now  established  for  the  maintenance  of  the  ancient  faith, 
by  publications,  by  schools  for  the  education  of  the  young,  and  by  fraternal 
admonitions.  One  of  these  was  formed  at  Stockholm,  1771 ;  another  at  the 
Hague,  1786  ;  and  a  very  extensive  German  society  for  the  diffusion  of  Chris- 
tianity was  started  by  Urlsperger  (after  1779),  with  its  principal  seat  at 
Basle,  and  without  regard  to  differences  of  creed,  including  all  who  acknowl- 
edged Jesus  as  their  God  and  Saviour,  {a)  The  Suabian  prelate  Oetinger 
(1702-82),  whose  mind  was  inclined  to  every  thing  mysterious  and  fanciful, 
and  yet  was  always  practical  and  fond  of  general  principles,  was  unwearied 
in  turning  the  attention  of  the  people  of  Berlin  to  that  of  which  they  knew 
nothing,  and  proclaimed  the  mysteries  of  God  as  a  sacred  philosophy,  in  which 
all  material  things  were  pervaded  by  spirit.  (6)  Those,  however,  who  con- 
tended against  the  innovations  in  an  fntelligent  manner,  were  themselves 
afl«cted  by  the  general  literature  of  the  day,  and  forsook  many  fundamental 
principles  of  the  old  Protestantism.    Individual  instances  of  persecution  were 

9  voK  OtmpbelPt  Life,  Jtc  of  Fr.  the  Or.  Lond.  4  vols.  8.  2  vols.  p.  8.  Lord  Dov«r^  Life.  &e.  of 
Fr.  the  Gr.  Lond  2  vola^  8.  D.  Thiebauli,  Orlg.  Aneodd.  of  Fr.  the  Or.  ftom  the  French.  Philad. 
160ft.  2  vols.  8.] 

h)  Briefe  an  Joh.  Mueller,  ed.  by  Mitnrer-ConKtwt  SchaflTh.  1840.  vol.  IV.  p.  ISss.  esp.  23. 

i)  F.  Nic.  l%*ber  nieine  Oclohrte  Bildung.  Brl.  1799.  J.  O.  FleJiU,  Nic.  Lcben  u.  sonderb.  Meiii- 
ungen.  Tub.  1S()1.     Govhingk^  Nic  Leben  u.  ML  Nachlasa.  Brl.  1820. 

k)  Kant,  Was  tst  Aufkldrung?  (Berl.  Monatschr.  1734_Dec.) 

a)  J.  A.  UrlMf.  Beschaffenh.  u.  Zwecke  e.  zu  errlchtenaen  deutschen  OesclUcb.  thStlger  Beford. 
reiner  Lehre'  u.  Gottaolligk.  Baa.  1781. 

b)  Bibl.  Wtirterbuch.  (1776.)  ed.  with  Explan.  by  Hamhtrger^  Stattg.  IS  19.  AntoDiog.  ed.  tb« 
Hune  Stuttg.  1845.    A'.  A.  Auberlin^  d.  Theoaophie  Oet  with  Praet  by  R.  Rothe,  Tub.  184Sw 


540  MODEBN  CHUBCH  HISTORY.    PER.  YL    A,  D.  1M8-186& 

not  indeed  wanting,  and  the  legal  censorship  and  the  pnblic  prosecutor  were 
sometimes  appealed  to ;  but  generally  instead  of  a  resort  to  the  civil  or  the 
ecclesiastical  sword,  the  most  timid  intrigues  were  carried  forward,  and  the 
people  were  indifferent  to  the  whole  matter.  An  attempt  to  snpprese  the 
new  freedom  of  instruction  at  the  University  of  Jena  (1794)  was  qnietly  sup- 
pressed by  Charles  Augvstus.  (r)  The  most  decided  hostility  was  displayed 
in  the  very  place  where  the  professed  enlightenment  originally  found  a  home. 
Frederic  William  11.^  painfully  impressed  with  a  sense  of  the  position  of  his 
illustrious  ancestor  with  respect  to  the  Church,  and  himself  under  the  infla- 
ence  of  a  faction,  was  anxious  to  aid  what  he  regarded  as  the  cause  of  Chris- 
tianity, and  published,  by  the  advice  of  his  ecclesiastical  minister  Woellner^ 
a  religious  edict  (July  9,  1778),  which,  for  the  protection  of  the  congrega- 
tions, threatened  every  clergyman  with  deposition,  and  even  with  severer 
punishments  according  to  circumstances,  who  should  presume  to  teach  any 
thing  inconsistent  with  the  symbols  of  the  Church  to  which  he  belonged,  {d) 
The  execution  of  this  edict  was  to  be  secured  by  a  national  catechism,  and  a 
commission  for  examination  (1791)  under  the  immediate  direction  of  Woell- 
ner.  (^)  But  even  the  law  passed  at  the  same  time  for  the  censorship  of  the 
press,  (/)  could  not  prevent  such  a  general  expression  of  disapprobation,  {g) 
that  Woellner,  to  escape  the  reproach  of  having  established  a  Protestant 
inquisition,  only  ventured  on  the  execution  of  the  edict  by  way  of  experi- 
ment, since  he  called  in  the  high  authority  of  the  chancery  to  aid  him  against 
the  opposition  of  the  superior  consistory.  The  decision  in  an  individnal  case 
was  to  settle  the  validity  of  the  threatened  rule  for  all  others.  The  supreme 
court  was  directed  by  an  order  of  the  cabinet  (1791)  to  inquire  whether 
Schnlz,  a  preacher  of  Gielsdorf,  (/)  who  had  assailed  the  fundamental  truths 
of  Christianity,  (A)  and  in  accordance  with  the  new  fashion  of  the  times 
wore  a  queue,  was  to  be  regarded  as  an  evangelical  preacher?  Although 
many  influences  were  brought  to  bear  upon  the  court,  and  it  was  threatened 
in  various  ways,  it  refused  to  act  inconsistently  with  its  long-established  repu- 
tation, and  decided  that  the  Christian  conduct  of  this  preacher,  and  the  love 
which  his  respectable  congregation  exhibited  toward  him,  would  not  warrant 
his  removal  from  them.  As  the  accused  was  however  deposed,  and  an  order 
WiOs  issued  by  the  cabinet  directing  that  those  members  of  the  court  who 
gave  the  obnoxious  votes  should  be  punished,  the  general  dissatisfaction  was 
much  increased,  {i)  It  had  now  become  evident,  on  the  one  hand,  that  the 
Church  was  established  on  no  legal  basis,  and  was  dependent  on  the  arbi- 
trary caprice  of  a  minister ;  and  on  the  other,  that  no  external  force  was  suf- 
ficient to  repress  the  intellectual  power  of  this  development.  When  Frederic 
William  III.  ascended  the  throne  (1797),  the  edict  lost  all  the  power  it  ever 

c)  (Rohr)  Wio  Karl  Augost  Bich  bel  YerketzerrangsvenTichen  gegen  Hkad.  Lebrer  befiahm. 
Ilann.  ISSO. 

d)  Acten  z.  nst  KOesch.  toL  L  p.  461b8.    Das  prauM.  R.  Edict  Eine  Oeaeh.  ik  d.  18.  Jahrb.  fSr 
d.  19.  Lr*.  1842, 

t)  (  Wald)  Ann.  d.  Pr.  Rel.  Wes.  179^toL  I.  8t  4.       /)  Aoten  %.  nat  KGeaeh.  roL  IL  p.  154» 
g)  Henke^  Beurth.  allcr  Schriften  welcbe  darch  daa  pr.  }fL  Edict  veraidaaat  sind.  Ktal,  ITM. 
h)  Erwels  d.  hinamelweittin  Unterftcbieds  d.  Moral  u.  d.  Rel.  ▼.  e.  nnenehrookenan  WabrtMili- 
frennde  Frk£  1788. 

0  Uenke^  Arch.  rol.  L  Qa.  8.  p.  84flB.     VaUr^  Anbaa,  toL  L  p^  Vlwk. 


CHAP.  IT.    EYANO.  GHUBGH  TILL  1814.    {448.    LESSING.    HEBDEB.       541 

pofleessed,  and  it  was  proclaimed  by  this  pioos  king,  that  as  religion  was  ex- 
olasivelv  an  affair  of  the  heart,  it  needed  no  compnlsory  enactments,  and 
that  with  reason  and  philosophy  for  its  inseparable  companions,  he  could  not 
donbt  that  it  would  by  its  unaided  energies  maintain  its .  existence  in  the 
nation,  (k) 

§  443.    Betolution  in  German  Literature. 

The  affectionate  reverence  with  which  Gellert  (1715-69)  was  surrounded, 
notwithstanding  the  contracted  and  sickly  spirit  he  possessed,  showed  that 
the  simple  utterance  of  a  pure  Christian  heart  found  much  that  was  conge- 
nial in  the  minds  of  others.  The  admiration  also  with  which  the  first  cantos 
of  the  Messias  were  received  (1748),  could  never  have  been  awakened  if 
there  had  not  been  a  general  confidence  in*an  incarnate  God,  who  had  given 
himself  a  sacrifice  for  man.  At  the  same  time,  however,  in  which  this 
theological  revolution  took  place,  the  intellect  of  the  German  people  be- 
came much  elevated.  No  longer  unmindful  of  its  former  glory,  nor  de- 
voting itself  to  the  pursuit  of  monstrosities  and  miserable  imitations,  its  full 
and  profound  spirit  now  awoke  to  a  consciousness  of  its  powers,  and  began 
to  form  a  polished  national  literature,  by  means  of  which  the  nation  once 
more  assumed  an  important  position  in  the  history  of  the  world,  (a)  Among 
the  leaders  in  this  intellectual  movement  were  some  who  stood  foremost  in 
the  theological  world.  Lemng  (1729-81),  who  never  aspired  to  the  charac- 
ter of  a  theologian,  but  only  to  that  of  an  amateur  in  theology,  with  power- 
ful native  talent  and  character,  threatened  to  overthrow  the  formal  principles 
of  the  old  Protestantism,  by  proving  that  Christianity  rested  not  upon  the 
Bible,  but  upon  the  internal  experience  of  men.  Although  he  entertained  a 
profound  respect  for  the  religion  of  the  people,  and  the  serious  earnestness 
of  genuine  orthodoxy,  he  annihilated  the  pretensions  of  the  Lutheran  pas- 
torate by  the  most  terrible  weapons  of  thought  and  learning,  {h)  He  was 
unwilling  to  accept  of  a  religion  on  the  veracity  and  faith  of  others,  and  by 
his  Nathan  he  persuaded  the  whole  nation  to  elevate  itself,  as  he  had  done, 
above  all  regard  for  historical  traditions.  Herder  (1744  1803),  as  long  as  he 
was  in  advance  of  his  age,  and  after  a  season  of  prophetic  youthful  extrava- 
gance, became  animated  with  the  same  enthusiasm  for  the  Scriptures  whicli 
he  had  felt  Tor  Homer  and  Ossian,  and  having  redeemed  the  gospel  of  human- 
ity from  the  dogmas  of  the  schools,  he  announced  and  gave  a  personal  repre- 
sentation of  it  among  his  fellow-men.  {c)  And  yet  this  triumphant  literature 
was  merely  a  glorification  of  the  world,  and  in  its  most  ardent  efforts  after 
ideal  excellence  had  no  very  definite  relation  to  Christianity.    From  holding 


*)  A.  K.  Z.  1827.  N.  25. 

a)  JI.  GeUer^  d.  deutsche  poet  Lit  8.  Klopst  Nach  ihren  ethischen  a.  reL  Oesichtspnnkten.  Lps. 
1841.    Comp.  Gervlnus  and  Yilmar. 

h)  £ine  Parabel  neb»t  e.  kleinen  Bitte  a.  eventualen  Abeagungschreiben.  Antl-Goeze.  1773.  and 
oth.  in  the  10  and  11  v.  of  Leseinj^'s  Sohrr.  6d.  by  Laehmann,  BrL  1839.— i?&Ar,  Leaa.  In  theoL  Bo- 
ziehiuig.  (Kleine  theoL  Sclirr  Schleus.  1S41.  vol  L)  Ri^ndckw^  Q.  Itoas.  ab  Hregebr.  d.  Wolfcnb. 
Fn^;min.  (Stud.  n.  Krlt  1S44.  II.  4.) 

c)  (Cbristl.  Schrr.  Kig.  1794aa.  5  Samtnl.)  Werke  z.  Bel.  a.  Th.  ed.  by  JI  (?.  Mueller,  T&b.  (ISOSasw 
12  T.)  18276a.  IS  r.  Z>ans  a.  Gruber,  Cbaracteristik  H.  Lpa.  1806.  If.  C  v.  Herder,  Erlo.  an  d. 
Leben  H.  TQb.  1S20.  2  vola.    Welmari!«be9  Herder-Album.  Jen.  1845. 


542  MODERN  CIIUBGH  HI8T0BY.    PER.  YL    A.  D.  164S-18S8L 

a  seraphic  kind  of  orthodoxy,  Wieland  suddenly  embraced  a  lax  system  of 
freethinking  (after  1760),  not  only  in  matters  of  faith,  but  in  those  of  morals. 
Goethe  took  some  interest  as  a  poet  in  the  various  manifestations  of  the  Chriflr- 
tian  spirit,  occasionally  he  himself  assumed  a  pastoral  style  of  address  whilo 
defending  practical  and  sincere  piety  principally  against  the  reckless  spirit  of 
the  innovators,  {(7)  and  he  abhorred  all  negative  criticism  with  respect  to  the 
original  authorities  of  antiquity ;  but  the  idea  of  any  interruption  of  those 
natural  laws  by  which  the  Deity  reveals  himself  to  men,  was  higjily  repug- 
nant to  his  feeling  of  exclusive  sympathy  with  nature,  and  fhe  decoration  of 
a  single  bird  of  Paradise  was  inconsistent  with  his  views  of  the  multiplicity 
\n  which  all,  things  appear.  For  himself,  therefore,  he  never  felt  the  need  of 
such  a  system  as  that  of  Christianity,  (e)  Schiller  has  sometimes  used  strong 
language  respecting  the  inconsistency  of  Christianity  with  the  adoration  of 
an  independent  Ruler  of  all  things,  with  which  the  age  had  made  him  ac- 
quainted, yet  in  his  mature  years  he  himself  postponed  die  categorical  impera- 
tive to  the  religion  of  free  inclination,  and  perceived  the  important  part 
which  the  gospel  sustains  in  the  history  of  the  world.  His  own  hopes  of  the 
world's  salvation,  however,  were  built  wholly  upon  the  influence  of  moral 
freedom  and  beauty.  (/)  But  by  the  side  of  these  highly  endowed  children 
of  the  world,  the  prophets  also  found  a  friendly  position  on  account  of  the 
kindred  spirit  of  enthusiasm  which  they  seemed  to  possess.  Among  these 
were :  Ilamann  (1780-68),  a  powerful  child  of  nature,  and  yet  one  filled  with 
the  spirit  of  the  Scriptures,  who,  with  a  style  as  abrupt  and  fragmentary  as 
was  his  actual  life,  poured  forth  his  prophecies  against  the  Babel  of  the 
Enlightenment  on  the  Spree  ;  {g)  Latatei'  (1741-1801),  who  with  a  magical 
versatility  of  talent  ingeniously  mingled  the  earthly  and  the  heavenly ;  (h) 
in  his  better  days,  Jung- Stilling  (1740-1817),  idyllic  in  his  style,  powerful 
in  prayer,  and  credulous  with  respect  to  modern  miracles ;  (/)  and  Claudiut 
(1743-1815),  with  his  humble  and  yet  humorous  sincerity.  (Q 


d)  Brief  d.  rasters  ♦  •  an  den  nciicn  P.  zu  ♦  ♦  Zwo  blbl.  Fragen  an  ©.  Landgelstl.  in  Scbwabeo. 
Fragniento. 

€)  Coinp.  e.  g.  Oiithes  u.  I^v.  Briefw.  od.  by  llineL^  Lpa.  1883.  and  Qothe^a  last  loiter  to  Aogiatt 
V.  Stolberg  In  tho  Urania.  1S39.  [Autoblog.  of  GocUie,  transl.  by  P.  Oodrcin^  New  York.  1846.  t 
vols.  12.  Works,  transl.  into  Engl.  Lond.  1852.  4  voK  8.] 
•  /)  R.  Binder,  Schiller  Im  VerlL  z.  Chrlstenth.  Stuttg.  1889.  2  vols.  Comp.  C.  tfUfnann  and  6. 
Schwab,  d.  Ctilius  d.  Genius.  Ilamb.  1840.  p.  81.<«^  Tendency  to  Christianity  :  F.  J.  G&tM^r,  Seh. 
Lied  V.  d.  Glockc.  Elbrf.  1858.  [Worship  of  Genius,  trannl.  ftx>m  the  Germ,  of  C  Ullniann.  Lood. 
1845.  12.  Life  of  Schiller  and  Exam,  of  Works.  Loud.  1825.  8.  CarlyU^  Life  of  S.  Lend,  and  New 
York.  12.] 

a)  Werke.  ed.  by  RoVuf,  BrL  182188.  7  vola.  and  8  vols.  (Nachtr.  n.  Erlautr.)  r.  O.  A.  WUmt. 
BrL  1S42.  Moller,  chr.  Bekenntnisse  u.  Zeugn.  t.  II.  M&nst.  1828.  F.  Jlerbst,  BibL  chr.  Denker 
Lps  1S30.  vol.  I.     W.  Sttuer,  de  Ilara.  vita  et  Scrr.  Vrat  1842. 

h)  Gehcimes  T.ngcbuch.  Yon  e.  Beobachter  sr.  selbst  Lps.  177288.  2  vola.  Aosgewiblta  Schrr.  ed 
by  OrfU,  Zur.  1841s.  6  vols.  F.  Uerhit,  Bibl.  chr.  Denker.  1882.  vol  IL  Gbth«,  a.  m.  Lebea. 
(Nachgol.  W.  1S3.3.)  vol.  YIIL  p.  142sa.     U.  FTegner^  Beitrr.  z.  Kenntniss.  Lav.  Lpa  18861 

t)  (.Tugend,  JQnglingsJ.  Wandersch.  1778.)  Lebensgescb.  new  ed.  Stuttg.  1885.  (vol  L  d.  aamintL 
Schrr.  ed.  by  OroUmanti.)  Sendschr.  geprilfter  Christen  an  J.  St  Carlar.  1888.  Schwartt,  St  Alt* 
u.  Lebeni^ende.  Ildlb.  1817.  Goethe  a.  m.  Leben.  (Werke.  1829.  12.)  vol  XXY.  p.  245.  Jacobft 
Brr.  vol.  U.  p.  4S7.  [Stilllng's  »* Childhood,"  "Interesting  Talea,"  and  " Poenmatologj,*'  have  be« 
translHtod  by  Jackson.  Lond.  4  vols.  12.  Autobiogr.  New  York.  1888.  8.] 

I)  SiimmU.  W.  d.  Wandsbeeker  Botben.  1774-1812.  7  ed.  Hamb.  1844.  8  to1&  16L  Oorop. Hist  pol 
Blatter.  1889.  vol  lY.  P.  668L 


CHAP.  IV.    EVANG.  CHURCH  TILL  1814    §444.  KANT.    JACOBL    FICHTE.    543 

§  444.     jReformation  of  Philosophy  in  Germany, 

C.  M.  MicheUt,  Oescb.  d.  Phil.  v.  Kant  b.  He^l  BrL  ISSTs.  2  vols.  If.  31.  ChalyhaeM^  hist 
£ntw.  d.  Spec  PhiL  v.  Kant  b.  Hegel.  Drsd.  (1887-89.)  4  ed  1848.  [transl.  Into  Engl,  by  A,  Edersheim, 
Edlnb.  1854.]    K.  BUdermann,  d.  deatsche  Phil  r.  Kant,  b.  a.  nnsre  2«.  Li)S.  1843. 

As  the  mind  was  acknowledged  to  be  the  highest  of  all  powers,  the  spirit 
of  the  age  pressed  most  ardently  forward  in  its  efforts  to  ascertain  its  nature. 
In  view  of  all  that  Wolf  and  Hume  had  said,  Kant  (1724-1804)  went  into  a 
carefal  investigation  of  our  faculty  of  understanding,  and  arrived  at  the  con- 
clusion that  we  cannot  know  things  in  themselves,  and  things  above  the 
reach  of  the  senses,  but  that  the  only  thing  certain  in  itself  is  the  moral  law, 
which  conducts  us  to  a  practical  faith  in  God  and  immortality.  He  also  ac*- 
knowledged  that  it  is  our  duty  to  connect  ourselves  with  Christianity,  on 
the  ground  that  it  is  a  popular  school  for  moral  education,  and  because  its  . 
sacred  books,  as  well  as  its  received  doctrines,  are  an  excellent  explanation 
of  the  great  object  of  morality,  (a)  Jacohi  (1743-1819)  agreed  with  Kant 
respecting  the  limitations  of  all  knowledge,  but  he  shrunk  from  the  direct, 
strict  way  of  reason,  which  that  philosopher  had  marked  out,  and  pointed 
out  in  a  dilettantic  and  exalted  style  the  certainty  of  those  religious  ideas 
which  are  found  in  the  sentient  part  of  man^s  nature,  and  which  neither 
have  nor  need  any  proof.  He  was  himself  profoundly  studying  a  problem 
which  has  employed  the  mind  of  man  as  long  as  it  has  had  an  existence,  with 
the  heart  of  a  Christian  but  the  understanding  of  a  heathen,  (b)  A  theo- 
logical school  was  founded  by  Eant,  but  as  his  influence  on  philosophy  con- 
sisted principally  in  the  scientific  and  moral  earnestness  of  the  movement 
commenced  by  him,  some  more  popular  results  have  been  produced  in  the 
department  of  theology,  \)y  the  combination  of  the  critical  philosophy  with 
the  philosophy  of  faith.  Fiehte  (1762-1814)  showed  that  the  ultimate  point 
toward  which  the  critical  religious  philosophy  tended,  w^as  faith  in  a  univer- 
sal moral  government.  But  as  he  was  not  satisfied  with  the  resignation 
which  both  Kant  and  Jacobi  required,  he  conceived  of  all  exbtence  merely 
as  the  voluntary  creation  of  the  mind.  Having  been  accused  of  atheism  in 
Electoral  Saxony,  his  self-respect,  which  identified  his  own  person  with  the 
cause  of  science,  led  him  to  use  an  incautious  expression  which  produced  his 
dismission  from  his  professorship  at  Jena  (1799).  It  was  not,  however,  the  • 
existence  of  God,  but  the  existence  of  the  world  that  he  denied ;  and  the 
omnipotence  of  the  /  in  the  religion  of  cheerful  virtue,  together  with  his 
confidence  in  the  approaching  end  of  Christianity  which  he  assumed  in  all 

a)  Krilik  d.  rclnen  Vernnnft  1T81.  Kr.  d.  prakt  Vft  1788.  Kr.  d.  Urthellakr.  1790.  BeL 
inoerh.  d.  Grenzen  d.  bl.  Vft  Kunfgsb.  1793.  and  often.  Summtl.  Schrr.  e«L  by  Ronenkranz^  Lpa. 
18S7S8. 12  vols.  IfartenaUln,  Lps.  lS3Ss.  10  vols.  DUlUin,  Bedent  d.  Kant.  Phil.  XQr  d.  neacre  Tb. 
(Stud.  u.  KHt  1847.  H.  4.)  [KaiU:»  Crltlck  of  Pure  Reaj^on.  Lond.  1S8S.  8.  An  AnalyMs  of  the  C 
of  P.  R.  Lond.  1844.  8.  Logic  with  Life,  by  liickardwn,  Lond.  188$.  8.  Metaphyslc  of  Kthic^ 
tran»1.  by  StmpU^  Edinb.  1888.  8.  Prolegomena  to  every  futare  Mctaphy»ic.  Lond.  1S88.  8.  and 
Theory  of  Eel.  iransL  by  SempU^  Edinb.  1887.  8.  A.  F.  M.  WiUich,  Tho  CriUcal  Phil,  of  Kant 
Lond.  179a     Tr<r^»/»flfin,  Prince,  of  tlie  C.  Phil.  Lond.  1824] 

b)  ifume  &.  d.  Glaiiben.  1787.  Von  d.  gotU.  Dingen  u.  Ihrer  Offenb.  Lps.  (1811.)  1822.  Werk«. 
I4ML  18128i.  6  V0I5.  Brlefw.  Lpa.  182568.  2  Y0I&  Briefvr.  zw.  Goethe  a.  Jac  Lpai  184^  J,  Kuhn^ 
Jac:  o.  d.  Ph.  sr.  Zelt  Mentz,  1824 


544  MODERN  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  YL    A.  B.  lM»-lSaiL 

liis  speculations,  became  finally  transformed  into  the  omnipotence  of  loTe. 
Christianity  was  recognized  by  biin  as  the  gospel  not  only  of  freedom  md 
eqnality,  but  of  inditference  to  the  world,  though  he  always  expressed  a  spe- 
cial )>reference  for  the  writings  of  John,  (r)  His  school  is  of  importazioe  in 
the  history  of  the  Church  only  because  it  was  an  important  point  of  progren 
in  philosophy,  and  because  it  imparted  an  heroic  strength  to  the  homan  mind. 

§  445.     Bationalhm  and  Supernatural  ism, 

Staudlin,  Ge^cb.  d.  lUt  a.  S«pr.  Gntt  l$e6.  E.  &  Pm*ep,  Caqsm  of  Um  late  ratiaaalls  ek«r> 
UT  ofthv  Tbei»L  in  Gtrniany.  LAtnd.  IS2n-«^  2  vols.  Anutnd  Saint^  Uiat,  criL  da  mbooaBmrnttm 
Alleniapie^  P.r.  O'^J)  !>*«.  ni.  Anmert  u.  Excur»«n.  v.  C.  G.  FicJur,  Lpa.  ISIT.  [A  Crit  Htac 
<>f  nAtiortalbm  in  Germ,  from  it5  Oridn  till  uow.  tnnsl.  from  tbe  French  d  Am.  SaintMt  hj  Ji  M. 
Btard,  Lon<L  l!!49.  <k    Art.  in  Kitto's  Joamal  of  BibL  Lit  toL  L] 

Tlic  theolog}*  which  now  had  the  ascendency  in  the  German  Church,  had 
avoided  an  open  rupture  with  that  which  the  Church  set  forth  in  her  creed^ 
and  yet  had  appropriate<l  to  itself  all  which  it  thought  intelligible  and  oseliBl 
in  them.  A  living  representation  of  it  was  exhibited  in  the  person  of  tbe 
mild  and  venerable  .S)><i /«//;»(/  (1714-1804).  (/i)  But  the  original  oppositioii 
wliich  will  always  be  found  to  exist  between  a  merely  sacerdotal  reSgiiia 
and  a  religion  of  mature  rea.-^on,  became  developed  near  the  commence- 
ment of  the  nineteenth  centurj*  as  the  principal  subject  of  contPOTersy  in 
the  Christian  world,  under  the  scholastic  names  of  Rationalism  and  Super- 
naturalism.  This,  instead  of  l>eing  a  discussion  respecting  some  peculiar 
doctrines  of  religion,  referred  to  the  primary  principles  which  lie  at  its  (baa- 
dation.  In  general,  Hatiomdism  found  the  supreme  law  of  all  religion  in  the 
reflecting  mind,  which  it  regarded  as  a  natural  revelation  from  Crod;  whereas 
Sni>ernaturnliNm  found  it  in  a  s;icre<l  tradition,  which  was  looked  upon  as  a 
suj)ernatur&l  revelation.  The  tendency  of  the  age  was  nnqnestioDabiT 
rational,  and  it  was  contending  for  liberty  and  intelligible  ideas  in  opposiDon 
to  merely  prescriptive  usages.  But  so  far  as  liationalism  constituted  a  as- 
tinct  school,  it  maintained  the  supremacy  of  a  sound  common  sense,  as  it  was 
defended  by  Wolf,  Kant,  and  Jacobi ;  it  appropriated  to  itself  tbe  natural  pbB- 
pion  and  earnest  system  of  morality  found  in  the  Scriptures ;  and  it  regarded 
this  as  all  that  was  essential  to  Christianity.  Every  thing  else  in  the  Khle 
it  set  aside  as  the  various  kinds  of  outward  covering  which  the  truth  assumed 
during  the  process  of  its  birth.  The  last  representatives  of  this  school  were: 
Paiihts  (1701-1851),  the  influence  of  whose  character  as  an  expounder  of  tbe 
Scrij)tures,  and  hL«  conscientious  earnestness  in  the  formation  of  his  specuk- 
tive  creed,  was  precisely  the  same  in  various  directions  as  if  he  had  been  an 
avowed  freethinker;  (h)   Wcjschevhr  (^1771-1849),  who  as  a  didactic  theoio- 

r)  Vor^  o.  Kritik  aller  OffcnK  Kiinig^b.  0^^^>  1?^  Gmndl  d.  WiaMiMchaftsL  Wcim.  im 
A;  \*c\\.  an  <L  Pnbl  u.  <!le  ibm  bc{::pnie»5<ncn  itthf i$t  Aeosser.  Jena.  1799.  Anw.  i.  wA  Lebes.  Btl 
1S<^  J.  II  FUhtf,  J.  G.  Flcl:te'5  LiN  n  u.  Briefw.  ISSOsl  9  rob.  GoHh«y  W«rke.  toL  TTTI  ^ 
l.Vl  P,:hIum^  Skinon.  p.  KiHw.  J.  11.  FUMf,  P*nla5  u.  FIcbte.  ^Frelhafen.  ISia  P.  i)  PwImIb 
N.  S»i>ln.n.  \<i\.  vol  I.  P.  1.  [Flchtes  IVs'.inaUon  of  Man,  The  Katnre  of  tbe  Scholar.  Tb«  T«e»- 
tion  of  the  Scholar.  Tlie  War  to  a  Ble»9o<i  Lifi\  anU  CbaracterlsUcs  of  tbe  Age,  have  be«a  traML  aad 
publ.  \»  Ith  a  MoTiu»ir  of  tbe  Aathor.  Li^nd.  IM&ft.  >.] 

<f !  J.  J.  S[K  lA»ben»be9cbr.  r.  ibm  9elb»t,  cO.  by  bis  wn.  ITaL  1901 
b\  Skinon  a.  m.  Leben^geMb.  z.  Andenken  an  meln  Oi>)ihr.  Jabtt.  Heidelt.  1811.  X  J.  i 
Un-M^degg,  II.  E.  0.  Paalaa  a.  i.  Zeit  8tnUg.  ISSSL  9  toU 


OUAP.  IV.  EYANO.  CUUBCIl  TILL  1814.    $  445.  RATIONAUSM.  545 

gian,  (e)  together  with  lidhr  (1777-1848),  a  high  oflBcer  in  the  Church  and  a 
popnhir  author,  showed  how  this  style  of  speculation  can  he  made  consistent 
with  an  ecclesiastical  professorship,  (d)  On  the  other  hand,  Sapematuralism 
ahandoned  the  fundamental  principle  of  the  fonner  orthodoxy,  hut  firmly 
maintained,  though  with  many  concessions,  that  the  historical  contents  of 
Christianity  were  a  supernatural  revelation  from  God,  and  employed  itself  in 
Buhstituting  a  hihlical  for  an  ecclesiastical  orthodoxy.  In  the  department  of 
German  literature,  the  older  Tubingen  school,  which  collected  together  out 
of  various  authors  the  mildest  views  respecting  the  writings  transmitted  by 
the  hands  of  the  Church,  (e)  appeared  to  he  the  only  support  by  which  the 
cause  of  Supernaturalism  was  preserved  from  an  entire  defeat.  In  the  ranks 
of  common  life,  however,  and  in  churches  of  other  countries,  this  system  waa 
the  prevalent  mode  of  communication  between  ancient  and  modern  times. 

§  446.     The  Eedmiastical  Party  in  Germany, 
BreUcKneider.  d.  Unkirchlichk.  dicser  Zoit  Goth.  (1820.)  1S32.  A.  KZ.  1828.  N.  lia. 

At  the  commencement  of  the  new  century,  the  pious  morals  and  manners 
of  the  preceding  times  had  become  seriously  impaired  in  consequence  of  the 
sudden  relaxation  of  the  former  system  of  faith,  the  unrestrained  mode  of 
life  which  the  revolution  had  produced,  and  the  universal  tendency  to  mate- 
rial or  political  interests.  The  religion  of  the  Bible  seemed  to  have  no  ele- 
ments in  common  with  the  modern  views  of  the  world,  and  the  religion  of 
the  cross  was  utterly  estranged  from  the  new  pleasures  and  glories  of  human 
society.  Tlie  school,  as  established  by  Basedow  (1723-90),  who  attempted  in 
a  rather  awkward  manner  to  realize  the  plan  suggested  by  Rousseau,  (a)  was 
inclined  to  assume  the  position  which  properly  belonged  to  the  Church,  since, 
instead  of  contending  against  an  innate  tendency  to  sin,  it  put  confidence  in 
the  general  goodness  of  human  nature,  and  instead  of  instructing  its  pupils 
in  the  Christianity  of  the  Catechism,  it  educated  them  as  reflecting  beings, 
by  agreeable  entertainments  and  by  pleasant  views  of  actual  life.  Pestalozzi 
(1746-1827),  on  the  other  hand,  devoted  himself  so  thoroughly  to  his  employ- 
ment, that  in  receiving  him  to  their  affections  they  also  accepted  of 
Clirist.  iji)  The  Church,  indeed,  still  possessed  the  confidence  and  love  of  the 
great  body  of  the  people ;  and  some  were  yet  firmly  attached  to  ecclesiastical 
principles,  and  scattered  blessings  all  around  them.  The  best  among  many 
of  a  similar  character  were:  Rcinhard  (1753-1812),  who  presided  over  the 
Saxon  Church,  preaching  the  gospel  with  a  scholastic  and  precise  rhetoric^ 
with  many  concessions  to  the  new  spirit  of  the  day,  but  with  an  earnestness 
worthy  of  the  former  times  of  the  Church,  doing  justice  to  every  order  of 


e)  litf  titntiones  Th.  Dogm.  Hal.  1815.  cd.  &  1844 

d)  Briefe  u.  d.  CAtionalism.  Aach.  {Zeita)  1813.    Erit  Predlger-BlbL  1. 1820. 

e)  Tub.  ZeitHch  unter  vcrscb.  Titel  1796-40,  cd.  by  Flatt,  Suskind,  Bongel,  SteadeL  Ck>mpi. 
KiMfnw.  liep.  1833.  p.  174. 190. 2iid.  21668. 

a)  (Jfeyer)  Has.  Leben  u.  Charakter.  Ilamb.  1791. 

h)  Ltenbard  a.  Oertrnd.  Zur.  (1781.)  179088.  8  vola.  Bach  d.  Matter.  Ifert  1808.  [Aotoblogr. 
Secnee  of  my  Life  at  Bergdorf  and  Tferdun.  Load.  1880.  S,  Biber^  Memoirs  of  P.  and  hia  Plan  of 
Kd.LoDd.  1831.] 

85 


546  MODERN  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  YL    A.  D.  16I8-19S8. 

talent,  and  moderating  every  injnrioQS  influence  from  without ;  (c)  and  O&ar- 
lin  (1740-1826),  the  pastor  of  the  Stein  thai,  and  a  Protestant  saint,  who 
showed  how  mnoh  an  active,  fervent,  and  simple-hearted  man  can  do,  with 
the  divine  assistance,  for  the  spiritual  and  temporal  welfare  of  a  congrega- 
tion, (d)  6nt  the  educated  and  the  half-educated  classes  turned  silently 
away  from  God,  or  at  least  from  Christ ;  and  even  those  who,  like  all  truly 
exalted  minds,  had  at  least  some  longings  after  eternal  things,  congratulated 
themselves  with  the  author  of  the  Titan,  that  they  could  penetrate  much  far- 
ther into  the  Infinite  than  could  either  Peter  or  Paul,  (e)  Rectitude  of  ex- 
ternal conduct,  in  connection  often  with  great  self-complacency  and  easy 
conformity  to  usage,  was  now  substituted  for  justification  by  faith.  Many 
sermons  were  nothing  but  moral  lectures,  or  sought  for  the  practical  in  some 
region  far  beyond  the  province  of  religion.  The  lifeless  condition  of  the 
Church  may  be  seen  in  the  vandalism  with  which  the  old  hymns  were  muti- 
lated. (/)  Many  pious  persons,  as  well  as  freethinkers,  were  apprehensive 
that  Christianity  was  about  to  be  subverted. 

§  447.     Small  Fanatical  Parties. 

A  strange  mode  of  divine  worship  practised  by  the  Jumpers^  a  dass  of 
persons  who  sprung  up  among  the  Methodists  of  Wales  (about  1760),  now 
made  its  appearance,  and  consisted  in  a  wild  leaping  upward  in  honor  of  the 
Lamb.  This  enthusiasm  received  a  regular  form  from  Anria  Let^  who,  in 
consequence  of  the  oppression  she  endured  in  England,  emigrated  with  her 
adherents  to  New  York.  Although  her  prediction  that  she  should,  as  the 
Lamb's  wife,  give  birth  to  a  new  Messiah,  remained  unfulfilled  at  the  time  of 
her  death  (1782),  her  followers  continued  to  praise  God  by  chastity,  commu- 
nity of  goods,  and  by  dances  like  those  of  David  before  the  ark  of  the  cove- 
nant. These  Shakers  have  their  principal  settlement  in  a  few  busy  and  neat 
villages  near  the  Hudson,  where  men  and  women  lodge  in  the  same  dwell- 
ings, but  most  strictly  separated  from  each  other,  witli  countenances  immova- 
ble, eyes  dull,  trusting  to  immediate  inspirations,  and  as  the  only  true  Church 
waiting  for  a  wonderful  development  throughout  the  world,  (a)    Jaarma 


e)  Gestundniase  a.  Predigten  u.  s.  Blldang  z.  Prediger  betr.  Sulzb.  (1810.)  131L    K.  H.  L.  PHUt^ 
F.  Y.  Relnhard  nach  6.  Leben  u.  Wirken.  Lps.  1818mw  2  ?ol&. 

d)  Notice  8ur  Ob.  Par.  1826.  Strattb.  1826.    //  Schub€H^  Zuge  a.  d.  Leben  Ob.  N&rnb.  18ML  6  ed.. 
1888.    Ihid.  aiis  d.  Nachlasse  efnee  Vielonfin.  Lp&  1887.    Ob.  Lcbenfge^eh.  n.  G««irom.  8ehiT. 
sammensrestellt  v.  W.  Burckbardt,  Btattg.  IfrlS.  4  vols.    [Memoirs  of  J.  F.  Oberlin.  Lond. 
Mark  WilkfS,  The  Ban  de  la  Roche  and  Itfl  Benefactor,  J.  F.  Ob.  L«)n<l  1820.  8.  L.  Balsey^ 
of  J.  F.  Ob.  PittKburgh.  1882.  18.    //.  Ware,  Hem.  of  J.  F.  Ob.  Boston.  188S.  11    Artt.  in 
Bev.  1S31.  and  Eclectic  Rev.  1828.  in  Rcl.  Mag.  1828.  and  LittelFs  Mns.  Pbtlad.  1S81.] 

e)  Briefw.  zwl^chen.  II.  Voss  a.  Jean  Paal.  Ileidelb.  1888.  p.  188.  6a    [Antobiogr.  of  J(tan 
Richter,  n-om  the  Ocrm.  Lond.  and  Boston.  2  vols.  12.    E.  Lm^  Life  of  J.  P.  B.  Boston,  1842.  S  v 
12.    Must  of  his  works  are  translated.] 

/)  Billroth,  Beitr.  z.  wlasensch.  CYitik  d.  hcrrscb.  TheoL  Lpa.  1881.    R,  SU^r,  die 
noth.  Lps.  1888. 

a)  Iffiike,  ReL  Ann.  P.  1.  p.  lOSss.    Archiv.  f.  KOesch.  vol  L  8l  1.    StdudUn,  Beitr.  vol  T.  Vl 
899.    Duke  Bernhardt  Roise  nach  Nord-Am.  p.  ITSss.    Blatter.  £  lit  Unterb.  1888.  N.  €1.  Fred.  BfU 
1844  V.  25.  P.  6.    [Calvin  Green  A  Seth  Y.  Wellt,  Millennial  Charch,  or  View  of  the  Sodetjr  ctXed 
Shakersw  Albnnj.  1828. 12.     T.  Brown,  Aecoont  of  the  people  oallsd  Sbakem  Trox.  1911  IS.    W./. 
JTackeU,  Shakerism  unmasked,  &c  Pittsfleld.  1S8&-12.] 


CHAP.  IV.    EVANG.  CHUECH  TILL  1814.    f  44T.  SECTS,    HAUGE.  647 

Southeote  also  promised  tho  people  of  England  that  she  would  give  birtli  to 
one  who  was  to  be  the  Shiloh  of  the  world,  and  made  it  the  duty  of  beliey- 
ers  to  observe  the  Jewish  law,  that  they  might  receive  the  Messiah  in  a  wor- 
thy manner.  Althoagh  after  waiting  for  a  long  time  she  cUed  (1814)  in  her 
delnsion,  and  the  splendid  cradle  which  had  been  prepared  for  the  Messiah 
still  remained  empty,  tlie  Nev)  Israelites  continued  till  1881  to  observe  the 
Jewish  Sabbath,  in  hope  of  the  future  Messiah.  (Ji)  Among  the  peasantry 
of  Norway  a  powerful  religions  movement  was  produced  by  NieUen  Hauge 
(1771-1824),  who  felt  called  to  be  a  prophet  like  the  herdman  of  Tekoa  (after 
1795).  The  law  of  God  was  the  principal  theme  of  his  discourses,  and  he 
judged  of  others  as  well  as  wished  himself  to  be  Judged,  exclnsively  by  the 
Scriptures,  and  the  catechism.  Community  of  goods  was  required  only  on 
the  principles  which  he  believed  to  have  prevailed  in  the  Apostolic  Church, 
and  whatever  property  was  intrusted  to  his  hands  he  employed  in  objects  of 
general  utility.  He  became  odious  to  the  clergy  on  account  of  the  suspicions 
which  his  conduct  threw  upon  their  order,  and  under  a  law  of  1741  he  was 
severely  abused  by  heavy  fines  and  a  long  imprisonment  for  preaching  with- 
out a  license.  Tliis  law  was  finally  abolished  by  the  Storthing  (1842),  and 
the  law  of  1845  gave  full  toleration  to  all  Christian  sects.  A  powerful  party 
has  sprung  up  under  Hangers  influence,  which  contends  earnestly  against  the 
ecclesiastical  authorities  on  account  of  the  laxness  they  exhibit  with  respect 
to  the  terms  of  salvation,  {e)  In  Sweden  the  special  need  of  family  worship 
on  account  of  the  great  extent  of  the  parishes  led  to  the  formation,  after  1808, 
of  a  party,  which  from  its  perusal  of  the  Scriptures  and  Luther^s  Postilla, 
were  called  Laemre,  Their  pious  zeal  was  proved  by  their  Lutheran  ortho- 
doxy, their  rigid  morals,  and  their  devotional  meetings.  A  few  zealots 
among  them  who  claimed  to  be  infallible,  on  account  of  their  possession  of 
the  Holy  Sjiirit,  and  therefore  dealt  out  their  curses  upon  all,  and  especially 
upon  the  clergy  who  thought  differently  from  themselves,  who  burned  the 
books  of  devotion  they  had  previously  used  because  such  works  were  useless 
to  those  who  had  the  Bible,  and  who  paid  no  regard  to  the  edicts  of  the  eccle- 
siastical authorities  were  fined  according  to  law,  and  many  of  them  endea- 
vored (after  1846)  to  find  their  Zion  in  America,  {d) 

§448.     Citil  Relations  of  Protestants  vnder  Catholic  Governments,     Cont, 

/row  §418. 

The  indifference  which  generally  prevailed  on  religious  subjects  had  the 
effect  to  bring  about  what  the  reason  of  the  age  demanded.  From  inclina- 
tion as  well  as  from  policy,  Frederic  II,  placed  himself  at  the  head  of  Pro- 
testant Gennany.    As  an  individual  event  it  was  of  no  great  importance  that 

b)  M^mtyer,  B*ob.  a.  ReU^n.  E<1.  2.  vol.  II.  p.  988a.  A.  K.  Z.  1881.  N.  67.  [P.  MatMan,  J.  South- 
cote's  Prvtpheries  nnd  cane  stated.  Lood.  1880.  12.] 

c)  ./>»«  Mo^lUr :  Archlv.  f.  KQesch.  vol.  II.  p.  d&4a&  Bch abort:  Ibid.  vd.  V.  p.  28Tt8.  Kv.  K.  Z. 
1881.  N.  M.  1834.  N.  57.  61.  (i7.  Sarwey)  Oodaoken  e.  S&ddoataehen  0.  d.  K.  Norir.  (Stud.  a.  Erit 
1849.  n.  U.) 

d)  Sehuhert :  Archlr.  t  KOeseh.  vol.  IV.  p.  62488.  V,  »788.  A.  K.  Z.  1821  N.  ».  1880.  N.  8a~BrL 
K.  Z.  1846.  N.  98. 1849.  N.  4.  D.  A.  Z.  1862.  N.  167. 


548  MODERN  CHUBCU  HISTORY.    PER.  YL    A.  D.  1M»-186& 

the  oppression  of  their  Protestant  subjects  by  the  princes  of  Hoheulobe  was 
prevented  by  the  imperial  troops  (1750),  (a)  but  German  I'rotestantism  gained 
once  more  by  the  proud  position  maintained  by  Prussia  a  consciousness  of  its 
political  power  and  security.  Jotteph  11.^  full  of  philosophical  zeal  for  the 
general  rights  of  man,  gave  to  the  Evangelicals  in  all  his  dominions  the  com- 
plete privileges  of  citizenship,  and  the  freedom  of  a  quiet  worship  (1781).  (b) 
This  edict  of  toleration  was  not  accepted  in  Tyrol  and  Hungary.  But  the 
Hungarian  Diet  of  1791  recognized  the  religious  freedom  of  the  Protestants 
by  the  restoration  of  all  their  former  privileges,  although  the  Catholic  ma- 
jority would  never  allow  complete  justice  to  be  actually  administered  in  this 
matter,  (r)  As  late  as  1762  religious  intolerance  was  still  so  strong  in  Tou- 
louse that  sentence  of  death  was  ])n.vcd  upon  the  honest  John  Calas.  Then 
it  was  that  Voltaire  came  forward  in  defence  of  murdered  innocence,  and 
convinced  the  French  nation  that  Christianity  was  not  a  barbarous  religion, 
but  one  that  enjoined  toleration  ui)on  all  its  votaries.  (f7)  Tlie  Parliament  of 
Toulouse  in  1769  recognized  the  legidity  of  a  Protestant  marriage,  and  the 
civil  rights  of  Protestants  were  acknowledged  in  1787 ;  but  the  complete 
equality  of  the  rights  of  the  Protestant  with  those  of  the  Catholic  Church 
was  not  fully  proclaimed  until  the  revolution.  Napoleon  granted  the  Pro- 
testants a  Synodal  Constitution  (1802),  though  he  subjected  it  to  great  limita- 
tions and  a  rigid  supervision.  When  the  Gernian  empire  was  broken  up,  the 
permanency  of  the  peace  of  Westphalia  became  doubtful.  But  the  right  of 
possession,  which  had  been  acknowledged  for  years  under  it  in  the  individual 
states,  was  maintained  until  the  higher  ]>rivilege  of  a  complete  legal  equality 
was  received  and  enforced  by  Napoleon,  esi)ecially  in  favor  of  the  Catholics, 
as  far  as  the  terror  of  his  cannons  prevailed,  {e) 


CHAP,  v.— THE  PROTESTANT  EVANGELICAL  CHURCH  UNTDL  185S. 

§  4f49.     Development  of  ProtestantUm, 

GieaeUr.  (p.  537.)  A.  Neander^  d.  vcrfloasene  halbe  Jahrk.  In  8.  Verb.  d.  Qcgcnw.  (IXentsdie 
Zeitsch.  t  chr.  Wiss.  1850.  N.  1-4.)— {/fundashagen)  Der  deutache  Protcstantlsinus.  Frkl  1S47.  8  eJ. 
ISftO. 

In  times  of  extreme  trouble  and  great  commotion,  when  the  insufficiency 
of  all  human  aid  was  evident,  the  people  sought  consolation  and  safety  in  that 
which  was  everlasting.  From  the  retirement  of  quiet  families  and  sects  a 
love  for  the  Church  of  former  days  was  openly  proclaimed.  When  the  Ju- 
bilee of  the  Reformation  was  celebrated  (1817)  the  hearts  of  the  people  were 
turned  to  the  faith  of  their  fathers,  and  Luther  was  looked  upon  as  something 
more  than  a  mere  hero  of  freedom.    German  theology  had  gone  forward  to 

a)  Saramlang  der  hohenlohischen  Rcl.  gravaminnm.  TTeilbr.  1751. 
h)  ffia/eri,  Kechte  u.  Verf.  d.  Akathollkeii  in  Oestr.  Yfen.  1927. 
e)  7VM«oan««,  Rel.  Beschwerden  d.  Prot  In  Ung.  Lpe.  ISSa  p.  1908a. 

d)  M6moire  de  Donat  Galas  pour  son  pere.  1762.     Voltaire^  TraiU  aar  U  toliranoe  k  PoecM  <!•  ^ 
mort  de  J.  Cala&  Par.  1768.  Bri.  1739.    [ffagenhach  ($  416)  voL  I.  Yorlea  8.] 
«)  KlUb^r,  5fL  Becht  d.  dentachen  BnndM.  Frkl  ed.  S.  1888.  p.  849. 


CHAP.  V.    KVANO.  CHURCH  TILL  1858.    $  449.  MODERN  PROTEST A^TI^M.    549 

express  the  negative  side  of  Protestantism,  with  none  to  obstruct  its  progress 
or  embitter  it  by  opposition,  and  it  now  lost  its  interest  in  mere  negations.  In 
all  departments  of  intellectnal  elfort  a  new  liistorical  spirit  had  been  awakened, 
and  had  drawn  the  hearts  of  men  to  subjects  connected  with  past  times.  It 
was  therefore  not  surprising  that  this  spirit  should  have  had  an  influence  upon 
tlie  common  feeling  of  the  Ohnrch.  The  old  Protestantism,  seizing  the  wea- 
pons of  tlie  new  age,  endeavored  once  more  to  win  the  empire  it  had  too  soon 
given  up  for  lost  "While  engaged  in  conflict  with  it  the  opposition  first  ex- 
hibited its  bitterest  earnestness,  and  like  the  warrior  spirits  after  the  battle  of 
the  Uuns,  they  once  more  entered  the  deadly  strife.  Many  persons  were  of 
course  painfully  wounded  in  this  contest,  and  act2d  inconsistently  with  their 
own  former  course,  (a)  But  a  fresh  feeling  of  life  now  pervaded  the  Church, 
the  poetry  of  the  old  Church  hymns  was  appreciated,  (b)  the  system  of  popu- 
lar schools  was  carefully  formed  on  a  Christian  basis,  and  theology  disclosed 
her  most  ample  treasures,  especially  in  Germany.  Holland,  Denmark, 
Sweden,  and  America  participated  in  these  blessings  with  joyful  emulation ; 
but  England  did  so  with  caution,  and  even  resistance.  This  progress  of  the 
new  age,  however,  could  not  be  arrested ;  and  it  was  found,  therefore,  that  the 
established  forms  of  the  ecclesiastical  creeds  which  had  been  for  a  time  aban- 
doned, could  not  OS  such  be  re-established.  Hence,  as  Protestantism  was 
obliged  at  some  time  to  discover  the  essential  contradiction  which  existed  in 
its  original  form,  and  to  develope  its  nature  as  the  Christianity  of  freedom, 
tlic  true  ideal  of  this  development  was  presented  in  the  religious  indepen- 
dence whose  power  was  rooted  in  the  Church.  But  the  perfected  idea  which 
could  not  be  realized  by  the  age  without  many  a  severe  conflict  and  extrava^ 
^nce,  was  exhibited  even  then  in  a  few  personalities,  types  of  the  future, 
which,  though  deeply  agitated  in  the  struggles  of  science  and  piety,  stood 
firmly  established  in  intellectual  freedom  in  the  church  of  their  fathers.  Thus 
Tzdchirner  (1778-1828)  openly  abandoned  the  precise  letter  of  Luther's  theo- 
logical system,  but  in  the  very  spirit  and  honesty  of  that  reformer,  conducted 
the  cause  of  Protestantism,  aroused  the  common  sentiments  and  feelings 
which  had  slumbered  in  the  hearts  of  its  friends,  and  showed  in  his  polished 
and  stately  discourses  that  every  thing  truly  human  in  the  past  or  present 
should  be  considered  as  having  a  relation  to  Christianity,  (c)  In  like  man- 
ner De  JVetU  (1780-1849)  investigated  the  Scriptures  with  an  independent 
spirit,  allowed  the  understtinding  full  liberty  in  his  judgment  of  the  creeds  of 
the  Church,  and  in  morality  laid  great  stress  on  the  right  of  a  subjective  con- 
viction. He  has  aL^o  pointed  out  with  a  judicious  spirit  the  peculiarities  of 
antiquit}',  and  the  style  of  sacred  poetry  which  the  received  doctrines  of  the 
Church  must  necessarily  assume,  that  they  may  be  accommodated  to  the  ordi- 
nary feelings  of  the  Church.  He  did  not  fail  also  to  show  how  real  Chris- 
tianity had  proceeded  in  the  form  of  the  practical  spirit  uid  life  of  the 


a)  LUtseiberger^  d.  Orfinde  d.  frelw.  Niederl.  m.  Ainte&  N&rnb.  1888.— (ri«M,  Bekenntnlaw  einen 
Freipew<ir(lnen.  Altenb.  1846. 

b)  (C.  Or&neL<ten)  Die  Oesangbucbsreform.  (Stuttg.)  188& 

e)  POliU,  Tzsch.  Abri»  k  Lebens  o.  Wirkens.  Lpti  1S28.  J.  D.  (ToMAonn,  Mltth.  ft.  Tneh.  tetartrn 
AmtA-und  Leideiujfthren.  Lpn.  1823. 


550  MODERN  CHUBOH  BISTORT.    PER.  YL    A.  D.  1US-180& 

Ohiirch  without  disturbance,  through  all  the  changes  of  human  speculation,  (d) 
Above  all,  Sehleiermacher  (1768-1 884)  pointed  out  the  various  revolntioni 
through  which  the  age  had  passed,  by  proving  to  the  self-complacent  party 
of  the  Enlightenment,  to  which  he  was  always  a  match  and  sni>erior  in 
every  thing  which  they  regarded  as  supreme,  that  even  on  their  own  ground 
and  when  every  thing  untenable  had  been  boldly  conceded,  a  life  withoat 
€rod  and  Christian  communion  was  utterly  unsatisfying.  Having  q>ent  a 
portion  of  his  early  life  at  Hermhut,  piety  toward  the  Redeemer,  even  in  its 
peculiar  features,  was  the  predominant  trait  of  his  cliaracter.  He  was,  how- 
ever, familiar  not  only  with  Plato  but  with  Spinoza,  and  in  the  full  conscious- 
ness of  his  freedom,  and  with  the  highest  esteem  for  genuine  character 
wherever  he  found  it,  his  piety  was  exercised  toward  every  thing  in  the  uni- 
verse. It  did  not,  however,  assume  a  Ohristian  charact^  until  his  own  eccle- 
siastical relations  were  developed.  Hence  the  fundamental  principles  of  the 
Reformed  Church  he  drew  fh)m  the  living  fountain  of  universal  Christian 
feeling.  This  was  an  experience  acquired  in  a  domain  inaccessible  to  philoeo- 
phy.  And  yet  he  never  surrendered  his  rights  to  exercise  his  analytical  criti- 
cism upon  those  enactments  of  the  Church  in  which  it  had  gone  aside  from 
the  truth,  and  even  upon  those  portions  of  the  sacred  Scriptures  which  he 
regarded  as  fallible.  Those  portions  which  were  addressed  to  the  feelings  he 
held  under  the  most  absolute  control  of  the  understanding.  («) 

§  460.     The  Philosophy  of  the  Absolute  and  its  RamificatUnu. 

In  direct  opposition  to  the  philosophy  of  faith  Fichte  had  exalted  human 
knowledge  until  it  took  the  place  of  divine.  When  Schelling  (b.  1775),  start- 
ing from  this  position,  had  construed  nature  as  if  it  were  a  shadowy  reflection 
of  the  spirit,  he  became  deeply  interested  in  its  actual  living  movements,  and 
as  his  highly  gifted  mind  was  engaged  in  the  contemplation  of  them,  he  came 


d)  Idee  (L  d.  Studlam  d.  Tbool.  (ISOl)  ed.  by  Stieren.  Lp&  1850.  Com.  CL  d.  Psalmen.  II<>ldIb 
1811.  8  eiL  182».  I^hrb.  d.  bebr.  Jnd.  ArchSol.  Lps.  (1814.)  1880.  Ue.  Rel.  u.  ThooL  Bil  (ISlSi)  IML 
Etnl  in  d.  A.  T.  BrI.  1817.  4  ed  1  S:38.  in  d.  N.  T.  Brl.  1828.  4  ed.  1842.  Tbeodor.  o.  d  Zweiflera  Welb*. 
BrL  1823.  8  ed.  1828.  Lehrb.  d.  SittenL  Brl  1888.  Die  H.  S.  iibersetzt.  Ildlb.  (IdOtfea.)  8  ed  ISSdi. 
8  ▼.  Ezeg.  Handb.  z.  N.  T.  1880-48.  Das  Wesen  d.  chr.  OL  Baa.  184&— ActensanmiL  o.  d.  Eatlati- 
nng  d.  ProC  de  Wette  v.  tbeol.  Loliratnt  zu  Berlin.  Lpfl.  1820.  F.  Luckf,  z.  Erin,  an  de  W.  (Stod.  «. 
Krit  1850.  n.  8.)  [Unman  Life  or  Practical  Ethics.  traiMl.  bj  &  O*ffood,  Boetoo,  1842. 2  v.  12.  Theo- 
dore, or  tbe  Slceptic's  Conversion.  Boston.  1841.  8  v.  12.  iDtrod  to  tbe  Oi  T.  tr.  A  oalaiged  by  Tknd, 
Parker.  Boston.  1848.  2  v.  8.] 

«)  (Vertr.  Briefe  &.  d.  Lucindc.  1800.  first  pabl  in  tbe  Athenaenm  with  Yorr.  by  (rutcifcMr, Ilainb. 
1885.)   Ue.  d.  EeL  Beden  an  d.  Ocbiidcten  nnter  ibren  Verfichtem.  BrL  1799.  5  ed  ISia   MeoolayfB. 
BrL  180a  6  ed  1848.    Die  Weihnacbtsfbier.  BrL  1808.  8  ed.  1837.    Ue  d  sogen  1  Br.  an  ThMtb.  BrL 
1807.    Dartjit  d  theoL  Stadinnis.  BrL  (ISll  )  1830.    Der.  cbr.  QIaube.  BrL  (1821&>1S80&  2  ▼.    Weikc 
s.  1881.  in  8  Abth.    Brief w.  m.  J.  Oass,  ed.  by  W.  Qass,  1852.    Deutsche  Zeltsdi.  C  chr.  Wi»a  18S^ 
N.  61.    SelbetMogr  (in  Ills  26th  year)  communicated  by  Lommatiscb.  (Zeit^cb.  f  liist,  TTi.  ISM.  H.  1.) 
—Rtumffarten-Crtudus,  fi.  SohL  Denkart  u.  Yerdienst  Jen.  1884.  L&clce  Erhi.  an  SchL  (Stud.  u.  Krit. 
ls84.  P.  4.)    SchueiUer,  SchL  KigenthumL  als.  Prod  UaL  1884     7%i>i,  ScbL  d  Dam.  d  Idtv  <».  ^i«I. 
Ganicn  anstrebend  BrL  188S.    K  Delbruck,  ScbL  Bonn.  1887.    J.  Schaller^  VorL  (L  SehL  Ilal  M«. 
G.  WeUuenborth,  u.  ScbL  Dial.  u.  Dogm.  llaL  1847.  2  vols.    BUndcker,  lu  Ebren  ScU.  (Stod  a. 
Krit.  184a  H.  1.)    [Eng.  translations  of  S.  are :  Crit  Essay  on  Luke  by  a  Thirhoiill,  Lond  lBi.\  H- 
Introd  to  Plato's  DialL  by  Dodson,  Lond  1827.  a    Obsfli  on  Sabellill^  with  notea^  by  Ji.  Si^'trt,  m 
Bib.  Bepos.  voL  Y.  p.  265i«.  YJL  lesi  and  OatUne  of  the  Stody  of  TheoL  with  LOcko'a  £4;mial^a•»cvs 
of  SchL  by  Farrar,  Edinb.  1850.  a] 


CHAP.  y.    EYANO.  CHUECU  TILL  1861    %4Ba.  8CHELLINO.    HEGEL.         551 

to  regard  the  whole  hifitorj  of  the  uniyerse  as  the  process  by  which  divinity 
was  developed  in  the  parallel  spheres  of  natare  and  of  mind.  In  his  subse- 
quent researches  after  truth  he  viewed  the  world  as  an  apostasy,  and  as- 
suming that  it  was  originally  in  op])osition  to  God,  he  explained  its  origin  in 
God,  and  its  distinction  from  God.  In  the  estimation  of  this  philosophy  re- 
li^n  is  the  immediate  coming  of  the  deity  to  self-consciousness,  Christianity 
divested  of  its  scriptural  simplicity  is  the  turning  point  of  human  history,  and 
the  system  of  faith  which  the  Church  has  formed  respecting  revelation,  the 
Trinity,  and  reconciliation,  is  the  explanation  which  it  makes  of  the  great 
problem  of  the  universe,  and  by  which  it  expresses  its  presentiments  with  regard 
to  the  final  resalt.  (a)  Closely  resembling  Schelling  in  the  reflective  and  tranquil 
manner  of  his  life,  Ile(fel  (1770-1831)  assumed  that  the  law  of  logic  was  the 
law  of  the  universe,  according  to  which  all  opposites  are  elevated  until  they 
beeome  lost  in  a  higher  unity, — until,  in  fact,  they  become  merely  an  idea, 
which,  that  it  may  recognize  itself  as  spirit,  places  the  universe  as  an  object- 
ive reality  apart  from  itself,  and  by  constantly  thus  raising  and  separating 
new  oppoeitee  which  occur  in  the  hbtory  of  the  world,  it  reveals  to  itself  its 
own  infinite  abundance  of  life.  In  the  view  of  this  philosophy  the  popular 
religions  which  have  existed  in  the  world  have  been  the  several  points  by 
which  the  divine  self-consciousness  has  developed  itself.  Christianity  being 
the  religion  in  which  the  unity  of  the  divine  and  the  human  is  presented,  con- 
tains the  ultimate  point  of  all  truth,  but  in  the  lower  form  of  the  idea,  as  it 
rem^dns  essentially  to  those  who  see  things  at  the  stand-point  where  God  and 
the  world,  tlte  present  and  the  future,  remain  in  opposition,  and  general  ever- 
lasting truth  is  possessed  only  in  the  individual  facts  of  Christianity,  (b)  The 
personal  influence  and  manner  of  Schelling  after  the  briUiant  period  of  his 
residence  at  Jena,  was  powerful  on  society  in  the  south  of  Germany  ;  while 
Hegel,  as  a  Prussian  state  philosopher,  even  when  idealizing  the  actual  world, 
produced  a  profound  impression  upon  the  theology,  principally  of  the  north. 
The  Kationalists  were  astonished  to  find  themselves  assailed  by  opponents 
quite  eqaal  to  them,  both  in  freethinking  and  in  science,  and  who  yet  gave  to 
Christianity  an  historical  importance  and  an  ecclesiastical  form  far  superior  to 
what  they  were  willing  to  concede  to  it.  They  therefore  accused  their  an- 
tagonists of  a  pantheism  which  concealed  its  inconsistency  with  morality  and 
religion  under  the  semblance  of  ecclesiastical  orthodoxy.  To  this  it  was  re- 
plied, that  Rationalism  was  a  stage  of  improvement  which  had  now,  with 
Kant,  become  utterly  obsolete ;  and  that  although  it  extolled  reason  as  the 
supreme  law  in  matters  of  faith,  it  had  never  attempted  in  a  scientific  man- 
ner, even  in  its  most  elaborate  works,  to  inform  men  what  reason  is,  and  what 


a)  LIL  In  MicAelet,  vol.  II.  p.  212!«.  A  esp.  in  Zeltschr.  f.  specnl.  Phyrfk.  1801.  vol  XL  P.  2.  Me- 
tbode  d.  ak«d.  Stadiums.  Tub  1S08.  2  e<l.  1818.— Phil.  u.  Eel.  18W.  PhlL  Schrr.  Lamlsh.  1809.  Denk- 
Dud  d.  Bchr.  v.  d.  gottllchen  Dlngen.  Tub.  1812.  [3foreU,  Hist.  A  crit  View  of  Spec.  Phil,  in  the 
19th  cent  (New  York.  15^8.)  p.  48368.  £|>iL  of  the  H.  of  Phil.  transL  from  the  French,  Sichy  CS. 
Henry,  (New  York,  1841.  2  v.)  v.  IL  pt  1958.-*.] 

h)  Lit.  in  MicheUi,  vol.  IL  p.  61lRa.  Diffcreiiz  d.  Fictc«cben  n.  Scliell  System!*.  Jena.  1901. 
PhMnomenologie  d.  QeisteA.  Bamb.  1807.  Encyklop.  d.  phil.  Wii^  Hdlb.  1817.  8  ml  1S81.  Vorlcsn  0. 
4.  PhiL  d.  BcL  BrL  (1882.)  1810.  2  v.    Werke  a.  1832. 17  vote.   Jlo^enkraru,  Uegers  Leben.  BrL  1844. 


552  MODERN  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  YL    A.  D.  lM»-18BaL 

is  its  province  in  roligioD.  (e)  After  HegePs  death  his  school  became  divided 
into  those  who  used  an  orthodox,  and  those  who  used  a  heterodox  mode  of 
expression.  The  former  class  explained  its  theological  views  in  the  spirit  of 
its  original  master,  (d)  The  latter  contended  that  it  was  only  giving  greater 
distinctness  to  the  original  sense  of  its  master,  in  opposition  to  the  ordinary 
mode  of  representation,  when  it  proclaimed  that  an  everlasting  life  exalted 
to  the  absolute  idea  is  in  fact  the  gospel  of  an  everlasting  death,  that  religion 
when  carried  to  its  perfection  by  reason,  is  only  a  God  worshipping  himself, 
and  that  a  God-man  is  one  who  never  had  an  existence  as  an  individual  upon 
earth,  (e)  Thus,  from  the  modern  attempt  to  exalt  the  old  orthodoxy,  has 
sprung  up  a  severe  struggle  for  the  fundamental  principles  of  Christiaaity, 
and  the  Hegelians  were  accused  by  the  friends  of  piety,  of  atheism,  the  anni- 
hilation of  the  biblical  history,  the  denial  of  immortality,  and  a  hypocritical  pro- 
fession of  Cliristianity.  (/)  They  replied  by  reproaching  their  accusers  with 
a  shallowness  which  could  only  think  of  God  separate  from  the  universe,  a 
selfishness  which  never  disengages  itself  from  its  own  little  I,  a  hatred  of  all 
philosophy,  and  an  apostasy  from  Protestantism,  (g)  In  some  philosophic 
researches  under  Hegel's  direction,  and  to  carry  forward  the  system  which 
he  had  commenced,  the  proof  of  an  immortality  of  individuals,  and  of  a  per- 
sonal and  if  possible  a  triune  God,  was  attempted  on  the  basis  of  the  idea  of 
personality,  (k)  Schelling^  himself,  was  called  (1841)  to  the  professorship  left 
by  Hegel,  that  he  might  heal  the  wounds  which  had  been  inflicted  by  philoso- 
phy there.  lie  despribed  the  logical  structure  by  which  his  predecessor  had 
attempted  to  complete  his  system,  as  a  mere  episode  of  that  system  by  a 
later  hand,  and  as  a  philosophy  looking  only  at  negative  results,  but  without 
power  to  escape  from  its  ideal  to  the  actual  world.  He  therefore  placed  by 
its  side  a  system  of  positive  philosophy,  which,  as  an  hypothesis  respecting  the 
play  of  antemundane  potences  assuming  in  the  actual  world  the  form  of  trini- 
tarian  personalities,  presented  some  hope  of  a  complete  union  of  science  with 
a  future  Johannic  Church.  But  the  age  had  no  taste  for  this  second  part  of 
Faust.  (0    The  original  moderate  Hegelian  school  was  represented  by  the 


c)  E.  g.  MarJieinekf,  Dogmatlk.  2  ed.  Vorrodo.  Ilega,  Phil.  d.  ReL  1882.  v.  IL  p.  S$l  [Mordi, 
(p.  456S8.)  «&  Ilftiry  (ji.  20S*s.)  as  above.] 

d)  G.  A.  G'lftUr,  de  verse  phil.  crga  rel.  pietato.  Ber.  1836.  Goachel:  derMonlsmas  dMGedank- 
ens.  Zur.  Apol.  d.  gegenw.  Phil,  am  Orabe  ihres  Stiftera.  Naomb.  1882.  Die  siebcnfalUge  Ottar- 
fhige.  BrL  1836.     [Motell,  p.  47S«.] 

e)  Coinp.  MicMK  v.  II.  p.  637.  Die  dt  Phil.  8.  Hegcls  Todo.  (Die  Oogenw.  Lpa.  1851.  voL  VL 
Ch.  Buob,  la  Phil,  de  TAbsola  en  Alleinagne  dans  ses  rapports  avcc  hi  doctr.  chret  M<»itauban.  184i 
[.VoreU,  p.  480.] 

/)  If.  Leo,  di«)  Hegelingen.  Hal.  (1S83.)  1839.— ^a/ini«,  Rago  n.  HcgeL  QnedL  IdSS.  Rheinv.  Bepc 
v.  XXXI.  p.  2Sa8. 

0)  A.  Rugf,  Prenssen  u.  A  Reaction.  Lpa.  1833.  G.  O.  MarhacK  Anfrnf  an  d-  prot  DentaebL 
wider  nnprot  Umtriebc.  Lps.  183Sa.  2  II.  (A  Bauer,)  Die  Posaane  d.  J&ngsten  Gerichts  iL  IXcfeld. 
Athei»tcn  u.  Anticbr.  Lpa.  1841.  C,  Zachieeohe^  0.  d.  Gott  d.  Prufl  Leo  a.  d.  Atheism.  &  Gegner.  HiL 
1839. 

h)  J.  If.  Fichte  '  Beitrr.  r  CharacteriaUk  d.  neuem  PhiL  Sulzb.  1929.  Ue.  Oegena.,  Wedep.  a. 
ZieL  d.  Phil.  Ildlb.  1632.  Ue.  d.  Beding.  e.  apecnl.  Theism.  ElberC  1885.  C.  H.  WeiitM  .*  Ue.  d.  g«- 
genw.  Staudp.  d.  phiL  Wias.  Lpa.  1829.  Idee  d.  Ootth.  Drad.  1888.  OrundzOge  d.  Metaphja.  Hmk 
1885. 

i)  J.  V.  SeheUlng,  Yorrede  ca  Coiuin,  &.  fir.  &  dontsohe  Phil  from  the  Frenoli  hj  Beckers,  Stottf. 


CHAP.  v.    EYANO.  CUURCn  TILL  185&    §  490.  BOSENKBANZ.    STRAUSS.    553 

noble  individuality  of  Rosenhranz^  and  sot  np  the  motto  that  true  reason  must 
lead  to  Christianity,  that  Christianity  roust  be  reasonable,  and  that  its  found- 
ers were  the  perfect  individual  realizations  of  the  idea.  {Jc)  But  when  its 
true  principles  were  exposed,  and  the  State  whicli  had  once  brought  it  into 
notice  had  withdrawn  its  favor,  it  could  no  longer  sustain  itself  against  the 
general  neglect  it  received.  Its  essential  principle,  however,  continued  to 
struggle  in  different  departments  of  literature  against  the  various  prevalent 
systems.  Strauss  (bom  1808)  represented  the  gospels  as  a  mass  of  fragments 
composed  by  th^  primitive  churches  as  the  natural  development  of  their  own 
views  and  feelings,  and  yet  he  looked  upon  Christ  as  the  ideal  genius  of  gen- 
uine religion,  and  as  the  highest  form  in  which  religion  has  appeared.  He 
did  not,  however,  conceal  his  conviction  that  a  collision  was  inevitable  be- 
tween science  and  the  popular  systems  of  Christian  theology,  whose  advocates 
had  raised  the  question  whether  he  could  consistently  belong  to  the  clerical 
profession.  Hence,  when  he  was  called  to  the  theological  faculty  of  Zurich, 
the  people  rose  np  in  behalf  of  the  old  system  of  faith,  and  the  government 
of  the  Canton,  though  willing  to  make  concessions,  was  overthrown  by  a 
committee  on  religious  faith  (Sept.  6,  1839).  In  this  affair,  however,  religious 
zeal  was  made  in  some  degree  subservient  to  political  objects.  (/)  When 
Bruno  Bauer^  who  had  been  thrown  from  one  extreme  of  the  Hegelian  party 
to  the  other,  and  proudly  scofied  at  all  theologians,  analyzed  the  ditferent 
gospels  as  mere  works  of  art,  originating  in  a  purely  literary  way,  and 
taking  their  form  and  materials  with  various  degrees  of  success  and  skill  from 
the  prevalent  views  of  the  people  long  after  the  events  of  which  they  speak, 
it  was  found  that  even  the  freedom  of  teaching  allowed  in  a  Protestant  coun- 
try could  hardly  tolerate  the  propagation  of  a  doctrine  which  totally  under- 
mined the  Church.  A  decided  majority  of  the  Protestant  faculties  of  Prus- 
sia whose  opinions  were  asked  was  not  obtained,  but  the  civil  authorities 
formed  their  decision  on  the  ground  of  the  views  then  expressed,  which  were, 
that  the  sentiments  maintained  in  Bauer^s  writings  were  inconsistent  with 
the  position  of  a  teacher  of  theology,  (w)  Indeed,  his  own  advocates  pro- 
claimed that  the  new  principle  was  atheistic  and  sans-culottic,  and  that  phi- 
losophy had  given  notice  of  its  complete  secession  from  the  Church,  (n)  When 
a  professor  of  aesthetics  acknowledged  himself  a  Pantheist,  and  attempted 
no  concealment  of  his  hatred  for  his  opponents,  the  whole  body  of  the  clergy 


1SS4  Schellinjr'*  errte  Vorles.  in  Berlin.  Stuttg.  1841.  Paulit^  dieendlfch  offenbar  puxronlene  PhlL 
d.  OlTenb.  (Sch.  VorleAangen  Im  Winter  1841.)  DarnisU  1843.  Vorwort  zu  II.  SteflTens  nachgel,  Schrr. 
r.  SchoIIlng.  Brl.  1846.— JTarAWn^ifc^  z.  Kritlk  d.  Sch.  Offenbarunpphll.  Brl.  1813.  (Kupp.)  F.  W.  J. 
T.  S^rh.  v<»n  e.  vieljahr.  Beobachter.  Lp.s.  1943.    Sch.  u.  die  TheoL  (with  the  Literatim')  Brl.  1S45. 

*)  EncykL  d.  the«»I.  Wi,-*.  llaL  (IS81.)  1845.    KriL  Erl  iut  d.  Heg.  Systems.  Kunijwb.  184<>. 

I)  [//rtiw.]  I-eben  Jesu.  p.  a4.  J).  F.  StrauM,  FricdL  Blatter.  Altona  1839.— Awf**',  Stranss  u.  d. 
ZQrch  Kirche,  with  a  Vorr.  by  De  Wetto.  Ba*.  1839.  A.  Bodcn,  Oesch.  d.  Beruf.  d.  Dr.  Str.  Frkt 
IBVi.  Der  Kampf  d.  Princlpien  Im  K.  Zurich.  V.  o.  Augenxeugen.  (Zeltsch.  f.  hist  Th.  HtO.  II.  8.) 
If.  G^^Mtr,  die  Strauss.  Zerw&rfhisM  in  Zur.  llamb.  1848.  [Strauss'  Life  of  Jesus,  ft-om  the  Qerm. 
Lond.  1846.  8  vok  8.    Letter  to  Hirzell,  Ac  Lond.  1844.] 

m)  [//tf*»,]  Leben  Jesn,  p.  85.  Bauer,  die  ev.  Landeskirche  Preoss.  u.  d.  Wiss.  Lp«.  1840.— Ou- 
tecbten  d.  ev.  theol.  Faeultaten  d.  Preuaa.  Univ.  CL  d.  Licent  B.  Baaer.  Brl.  1842.  For  Lit  see  Brun^ 
Bep.  1S4&  vol  II.  p.  97sa. 

n)  Edgar  Bauer,  B.  Baaer,  u.  a.  Gegner.  BrL  1842.  Deutsche  Jabrbb.  1842.  N.  8s.  Opitt,  B. 
Bauer  n.  b.  G«gDer.  BrsL  1846. 


554  MODERN  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  VL    A.  D.  1648-18Sa. 

in  the  country  rose  in  opposition  to  the  Anticbristianity  of  Tabingen,  and  the 
government  censured,  but  protected  him  by  a  sospeosion  of  two  years,  (o) 
Lewis  Feutrhach  having  pkced  the  old,  genuine  gospel,  which  had  conquered 
and  despised  the  world,  in  direct  contrast  with  the  modem  system  of  pro- 
gress, declared  Christianity  a  fixed  idea,  and  all  religion  a  dream,  from  which 
when  man  iiwnkes  ho  finds  only  himself.    Ilis  baptism  of  cold  water  was  not 
unacceptable  to  such  youth  as  had  ])reviously  fallen  out  with  the  notion  of 
the  divine  existence,  {p)    Near  the  close  of  the  eighteenth  century  an  enthih 
siasm  for  the  glorious  life  of  the  ancient  Greeks  reappeared  aShong  the  poets. 
The  great  (lerinan  poet,  who  had  been  profoundly  affected  by  the  world^s 
mighty  convulsions,  now  proclaimed  the  new  gospel  of  the  rehabilitation  of 
the  flesh  in  contrast  with  a  Christianity  which  had  been  especially  designed 
for  the  spirit  in  its  horror  at  a  nature  peopled  with  spectres,  and  which  had 
for  1800  years  coa^led  men  in  all  their  sorrows,  {q)  He  was  soon  surrounded 
by  a  literary  circle  belonging  to  a  young  Germany,  which  either  wished  to 
remove  the  schism  which  Christianity  had  made  known  between  God  and 
the  world  by  means  of  Christ  born  on  earth  as  the  world^s  legitimate  child,  (r) 
or  thought  that  men  would  have  been  happier  had  they  been  entirely  ignorant 
of  God,  and  hence  declared  that  the  vicars  of  heaven  were  not  needftd  for 
the  most  exhilarating  enjoyments  of  existence.  ($)    This  youthftd  poetry  was 
destroyed  as  it  were  in  a  night,  not  by  the  police,  but  by  the  serious  morality 
of  the  German  people.  (Q  The  more  talented  among  them  directed  their  atten- 
tion to  a  nobler  intellectual  chivalry,  and  though  the  poet  who  had  led  them, 
after  long  keeping  swine,  like  the  prodigal  son,  among  the  Hegelians,  returned 
to  his  forsaken  God,  he  never  lost  the  inclination  to  Jest  at  holy  and  unholy 
things,  even  on  a  hopeless  sick  bed.  (u)  But  the  poetry  of  a  Pantheism  which 
leads  men  according  to  their  moral  dispositions  to  adore  either  the  universe  or 
themselves,  and  sometimes  to  worship  the  Son  of  God  as  a  son  of  the  peoi^ 
has  often,  without  being  recognized  in  its  true  character,  prevailed  extensively 
among  the  half-educated  multitude,  (p)    But  as  Christianity  had  been  accused, 
in  quarters  where  poetry  had  not  joined  in  the  reproach,  of  a  secret  worship 
of  Moloch,  and  of  cannibalism  as  well  as  of  other  crimes,  it  was  resolved  that 
in  place  of  this  barbarous  and  slavish  religion  a  pure  HumanUm  should  be  set 
up,  as  the  autonomy  of  the  spirit  resting  upon  its  own  authority  alone,  a  new 
religion  looking  distinctly  to  earthly  interests,  or  triumphing  over  all  religion 


o)  F.  Viwher^  akad.  Redo  z.  Antrltto  d.  Ordioa^Ut«^  21st  Not.  ISU.  Tut.  1841  Lit  ia  BniUi 
Rep.  1S45.  vol.  IV.  p.  189»a. 

p)  Phil.  u.  Christenth.  Mannli.  1839.  Das  We^en  d.  Cbristenth.  Lps.  (1341 -ISw)  1SI8.  Yorltfli.  fi. 
d.  We^en  d.  Rcl.  Lps.  1S51. 

q)  JT.  IMne^  Ge^ch.  <L  ncliooen  Lit.  in  DcatschL  Par.  1883.  vol  L  p.  6w  83.  6ea.  Zar  Octeh.  d.  Bel 
u.  PhiL  iSalon.  Hamb.  1S85.  vol.  II.) 

r)  Th.  MundU  Madonna.  Untcrhaltuncren  in.  o.  Ileiligen.  Lpa  1885^ 

«)  CiUtkow,  Vtirrede  za  Schleierm.  Briefen  u.  d.  Lncinde.  Hamb.  1885w 

t)  (J.  P.  iMngf)  V<^  d.  Rehablliuition  d.  Fleischea.  (Ev.  K.  Z.  1885i  N.  SSflik)  ((?.  &3kwMby)\dkom 
CL  d.  junge  D.  Stiitts.  1S36.  K.  Hane^  d  junge  D.  ParcbinL  1S8T.— AiuZim,  d.  Ilo^erlchU  n  Mau* 
lieim  motiv.  ITrtlioil  iL  d.  in  d.  Romane  Waliy  angckL  PrDftvergehn.  Udib.  1886. 

u)  IL  Ihine,  Kumanzoro.  Ilamb.  ]S«M. 

«)  L.  Sch^ffr,  Uii^nbre\ ier.  Brl  5  ed.  1846.  Das hobe  Lied  v. Titos  Ulilch.  Bri.  184&.  F,9,Sa^ 
lei^  Laienevangeliiim.  Lps.  1842. 


CHAP.  y.    EVANO.  CHURCH  TILL  1808.    f  451.  OBTHODOX  PIETISBL        555 

80  a  eonqnered  territory,  (w)  A  coarse  political  liberalism,  from  an  extreme 
hatred  of  the  clergy  rejected  also  the  God  whom  they  served,  that  it  might 
nave  its  own  God  of  this  world  and  of  freedom,  (x)  This  plan  of  a  com- 
plete ruptore  with  the  whole  historical  development  of  past  times,  led  the 
nne^ucated  classes  to  confound  in  one  general  mass  their  own  wants  and  de- 
sires with  the  dregs  of  philosophy.  Boon  God  was  annihilated  and  tlic  peo- 
ple were  deified,  patriotism  was  despised  that  all  pions  reverence  might  bo 
obliterated  with  it,  and  Christ  was  made  prominent  only  as  his  name  could  bo 
used  to  sonctioxi  democratic  and  revolutionary  principles,  (y) 

§  451.     Orthodox  Pietism  and  it^  Extremes, 

The  romantic  poetry  which  prevailed  in  the  beginning  of  the  centur}-  was 
a  shadowless  picture  of  the  piety  of  the  middle  ages.  Notalis  (v.  Hiirden- 
bnrg,  1772-1801)  found  a  religion  in  poetry,  wliich,  having  destroyed  its  own 
I  in  its  ardent  longings  over  the  grave  of  Protestantism,  and  over  the  ruius  of 
Rome,  indulged  in  fond  dreams  of  a  new  church  of  the  all-pervading  deity,  (a) 
The  national  feeling  which  had  been  awakened  during  the  wars  for  freedom, 
and,  after  the  victory  had  been  defrauded  of  its  natural  development,  and  re- 
pressed until  it  became  once  more  nothing  but  a  pitiful  Germanism,  now 
longed  to  recover  the  pious  manners  of  earlier  days.  This  longing  still  re- 
mained, even  when  a  portion  of  the  youth  had  ceased  to  hope  for  any  thing 
from  political  agitations.  A  religious  pleasure  was  derived  from  an  investiga- 
tion of  the  mysteries  of  nature,  and  of  the  spiritual  world,  and  from  an 
effort  to  break  through  the  limits  prescribed  for  man.  if)  In  connection  with 
such  a  disposition,  the  revolution  which  then  took  place  in  the  religious  life, 
in  accordance  with  the  laws  which  regulate  intellectual  movements,  called 
forth  an  extreme  reaction  against  the  rationalism  which  prevailed  even  in  the 
third  decennary  of  that  century,  and  then  against  the  philosophizing  Anti- 
christianity.  By  means  of  conventicles  and  tracts  a  zealous  party  was  soon 
formeil,  and  an  energetic  organ  of  communication  with  the  public  was  estab- 
lished in  the  Evangelical  Church  Journal  (1827).  (c)  Its  essential  character 
is  pietistic,  (c/)  though  it  is  more  liberal  and  better  accommodated  to  ordinary 


«>)  Daumtr:  Die  Gchcimn.  d.  chr.  Altorth.  Ilitnib.  1S47.  Die  Rel.  d.  nenen  WelUltera.  Ibid. 
1850.  3  voK    A.  Ruge^  Gesomm.  Schrr.  Monb.  1S4C-3.  10  vula. 

e)  Rhelnwald  R«p.  1831  vol.  V.  {>.  TU 

y)  Xaos  Stimer,  d.  Elnzlc^  a.  b.  El^ontb.  Lp^  1819.  W.  Jfan\  d.  Junge  Deatscbl.  in  d.  Schweiz. 
Lpa  19Mw    «/.  Frdbfl,  Syvtera  d.  social.  Politlk.  Ziir.  1847. 

<i)  Scbrlften,  ed.  by  Tleck  A  Schlegol,  Br  1. 1804.  6  ed.  1887-40.  8  vols. 

b)  IMo  Stjberln  von  Prevorst.  Stuttg.  (IS29.)  1888.  2  v.  [Tbo  Seereas  of  Prevoret,  or  Revelatt  of 
th(>  *.nnoT  life  of  man.  New  York.  183S.  S.]  Geschicbten  Beacasener.  Garlsr.  1834.  Maglkoii,  od.  by 
J.  Kerner.  Statte.  1840.  2  H. 

c)  />.  SchiUz,  d.  Wesen  u.  Treiben  d.  Berl.  ev.  K.  Zeltong.  Biri.  ISSSai  2  P.  (On  tbo  otber  aklc: 
Die  ev.  Kircbe  u.  d.  Conaiatorialrath  8cbulz.  BrL  1S39.>— i/.  Swald^  die  Ungeacbicbtlichk.  ev.  Gelst- 
Mciien.  TQb.  \^^>.  L.  B.  K  (unij;.)  II.  Uongstonb.  Braanachw.  1845.  Der  Oeiat  d.  ev.  K.  Z.  2  ed.  BrL 
184&  (On  the  otber  aide:  Die  Partel  d.  Ev.  K.  Z.  Yon  e.  Laien.  Ev.  K.  Z.  1840.  N.  158.  18a.  SOaa.) 
C  Ztehieschf,  d.  Ev.  K.  Z.  n.  ihr  Treiben.  Lpa.  134& 

d)  BrfUehruUltr^  d.  Grandlage  d.  ev.  Piet  Lpa.  1888.  C  JfdrlUiH,  Dar^t  u.  KriUk  d.  mod.  Pict. 
Btnttf^  1839.  Comp.  Vomer  in  d.  Stud.  n.  Krit  184a  P.  1.  Lit.  Survey :  Bhelnwald,  Bep.  v.  XXVIL 
p.  4:^  l.'Maa. 


556  MODEBN  CHUBCH  HI8T0BY.    PER.  YI.    A.  D.  164S-1868L 

life  than  was  the  pietism  of  the  eighteenth  centary.  It  has  also  been  more 
disposed  to  enter  into  the  toils  and  honors  of  secular  life,  and  in  various  de- 
grees it  has  become  connected  with  the  old  Protestant  orthodoxy,  and  as- 
sumed its  controversial  character,  (e)  As  to  its  religious  elements  it  embraces 
the  greatest  variety,  from  the  genuine  piety  exhibited  by  Luther  or  Speper, 
ftiU  of  a  joyful  faith  in  a  God  bom  of  the  Virgin,  down  through  the  several 
gradations  of  pure  party  zeal,  pride,  and  mental  imbecility,  until  we  reach 
the  hypocrisy  which  uses  the  language  of  ardent  piety  to  gain  selfish  ends,  or 
even  to  cover  the  most  criminal  designs.  (/)  Although  the  principal  leaders, 
whenever  they  expressed  themselves  in  a  literary  style,  committed  serious 
offences  against  the  old  Lutheran  or  Calvinistio  theology,  and  when  confessing 
their  sins  adopted  many  rationalistic  excrescences,  (g)  they  regarded  the  theo- 
logical views  advanced  in  those  systems  as  that  by  which  alone  men  could  bo 
saved,  and  all  other  views  of  Christianity,  except  some  fragments  of  truth 
among  the  Catholics  and  Supernaturalists,  as  unchristian.  It  was  on  aooount 
of  this  exclnsiveness  that  even  such  theologians  as  Neander  felt  compelled  to 
withdraw  from  their  connection.  They  also  erected  a  literary  inquisition,  the 
object  of  which  was  at  first  disavowed,  but  was  afterwards  acknowledged  to 
be  indispensable,  and  which,  when  it  condemned  individuals,  clothed  its  veF- 
dicts  in  the  language  of  Christian  intercession.  (A)  As  a  complete  return  to 
the  position  of  former  orthodoxy  was  impossible,  without  denying  the  reality 
of  the  secular  progress  which  lay  in  the  retrograde  path,  they  pronounced  all 
these  improvements  heathenish,  and  with  a  puritanical  and  stupid  assurance 
they  condemned  every  cheerftil  expression  of  genius,  (i)  and  sighed  over  the 
whole  development  of  the  Church  as  an  apostasy.  From  an  extreme  dread 
of  the  revolutionary  spirit  of  the  times,  those  especially  who  belonged  to  the 
higher  classes  now  turned  to  every  thing  old,  even  in  matters  of  faith.  The 
Church  Journal  reproached  an  honorable  clergy,  anxious  for  their  inherited 
rights  and  for  their  country,  with  being  favorable  to  a  perjured  insurrection, 
and  in  the  style  of  von  Ilaller  (k\  by  means  of  a  patriarchal  theory  of  state, 
advocated  the  absolute  divine  right  of  rulers,  and  yet  announced  the  ove^ 
throw  of  a  government  favorable  to  rationalism  by  a  popular  insurrection,  as 
a  victory  for  the  cause  of  God.  (Z)  Journals  of  the  same  complexion,  also,  in 
France  and  North  America,  were  in  the  habit  of  using  the  boldest  democratio 
forms  of  language  in  the  style  of  the  old  Puritans,  (w)  In  Grerman  countries 
divines  of  a  liberal  culture  gradually  died,  almost  every  professorship  and 
ecclesiastical  ofiice  of  an  exalted  influence  was  filled  by  persons  favorable  to 
the  new  orthodoxy,  and  those  inclined  to  free  researches  were  intimidated 
from  pursuing  theological  studies  by  the  hopelessness  of  all  such  efibrts.    A 


f)  E.  g.  Rdhr,  Prod.  BIbL  1831.  P.  6.  NotizenbL  N.  6. 

/)  PwK>ft  In  Schulz,  I.  p.  11.  17.  85«s.        ff)  Jbid,  II,  184m. 

h)  Ev.  K.  Z.  1880.  N.  109S.  1831.  N.  6788L  938&  Conip.  Af.  {7dM,  knrze  aber  notbw.  Brin.  ft.  dLiI* 
den  d.  jungen  Werther.  lUmb.  1T75. 

€)  Ev.  K.  Z.  1S50.  N.  24  25.  44  46. 1851.  N.  li.—J.  0.  K.  ffqfinann,  die  sehleswig-bolst  Oebtliet 
u.  d.  ev.  K.  Z.  Erl.  1350. 

*)  Ev.  K,  Z.  1881.  N,  18m.  80s.  105.  183a  N.  81.  On  the  other  ride :  A.  K.  Zu  1888.  N.  1b&  &*«^ 
I.  p.  70»^  II.  p.  41a8.    A.  Widmann,  poHt  Bedenken  wider  d.  Ev.  K.  Z.  Potsd.  184«. 

0  f  450.  nt  *.)       m)  Ev.  K.  Z.  1830.  N.  86. 1881.  N.  18a.  80.  Sli.  1888.  N.  48.  69. 


CHAP.  Y.    EVANQ.  CHURCH  TILL  1S58.    1 451.  8EPABATI6M.    BAPP.         557 

• 

younger  dorgy  was  therefore  raised  np,  inclined  to  the  new  party,  and  ani- 
mated by  the  energy  of  a  principle  newly  asserted,  but  derived  from  great 
examples  in  former  times.  The  artificial  work  of  sustaining  this  party  de- 
volved in  Germany  upon  those  established  churches  which  were  under  Oath- 
olic  guardianship,  and  after  the  suppression  of  the  revolutionary  movements 
of  1848,  it  became  a  principle  for  the  administration  of  government.  The 
Evangelical  Church  Journal  then  contended  bravely  against  the  storm, 
with  only  trifling  concessions,  and  the  few  clergymen  who  became  excited 
by  the  popular  movements  acknowledged  that  the}'  wore  not  sustained  by 
their  congregations.  It  is  not  probable,  nor,  if  we  look  at  the  whole  process 
of  German  culture,  is  it  credible,  that  the  mass  or  the  true  nobility  of 
the  German  nation  will  renounce  all  that  it  has  inherited  from  the  last  cen- 
tury, and  become  converts  to  this  precise  form  of  theological  doctrine  which 
has  always  become  most  prominent  when  its  political  objects  were  most  im- 
deniable,  {n)  and  which  has  in  public  life  violated  all  obligatione  and  truth. 
Still,  with  all  the  disturbance  which  this  party  has  often  caused  in  the  affairs 
of  various  congregations,  and  the  many  troubles  or  extravagances  which  it 
has  produced  in  individuals,  until  in  some  cases  they  have  been  driven  to 
madness,  it  has  been  the  means  of  accomplishing  much  good.  It  has  soft- 
ened many  obstinate  dispositions,  and  had  an  important  influence  in  the  de- 
velopment of  the  Church.  It  has  strengthened  the  confidence  of  the  Church 
in  her  possession  of  a  form  which  is  primitive  and  divine,  brought  to  light 
the  defective  nature  of  modern  Superuaturalism,  introduced  new  investiga- 
tions of  subjects  Avhich  would  otherwise  have  been  too  hastily  given  up, 
denounced  many  an  exhibition  of  a  narrow  superficial  spirit  which  obtained 
favor  under  the  garb  of  reason,  and  by  way  of  warning  has  shown  what 
must  be  the  result  of  a  zeal  for  the  mere  externals  of  a  system  which  has  now 
passed  away.  Only  a  few  isolated  instances  occur,  in  which  this  pietistic 
spirit  could  not  find  satisfaction  in  the  ordinary  ecclesiastical  connections,  or 
has  assumed  any  extraordinary  appearances.  Among  the  Suabian  tribes  these 
excited  persons  seized  upon  some  peculiar  sentiment  of  some  eminent  eccle- 
siastical teacher,  or  induced  some  individuals  to  become  their  advocates 
among  the  people.  Their  disposition  was  in  some  instances  melancholy,  and 
in  others  cheerful.  Although  in  this  region  also  the  clergy  generally  adhered 
to  ancient  usages,  many  innovations  had  been  made  in  their  mode  of  instruc- 
tion, in  the  liturgy,  and  in  the  hymn-book.  The  opposition  therefore  be- 
came distinctly  organized,  and  a  few  Separatists  refused  to  perform  their 
ordinary  ecclesiastical,  and  even  their  civil  duties.  Punishments  and  force, 
in  some  instances  carried  so  far  as  to  take  persons  by  violence  to  the  Church, 
were  of  course  in  vain.  The  civil  authorities  in  Wurtemherg  finally  permit- 
ted those  who  were  discontented  to  assemble  in  a  congregation  at  KorntJial 
(1818),  with  a  peculiar  ecclesiastical  and  civil  constitution  conformed  as  near 
as  possible  to  the  type  of  the  apostolic  Church,  but  under  the  inspection  of 
the  civil  authorities,  (p)     Others  wandered  away  (after  1805)  to  North 


«i)  £.  g.  Cotnp.  A.  K.  Z.  1861.  N.  b& 

o)  Archiv  f.  KG.  vol  IV.  p.  4S»e».    &  C.  Kaj^^  d.  Wurtcmb.  Brudergcmeinden  In  Kornth.  n. 
Wilhelmadorl  Stuttg.  1889.  BrL  A.  K.  Z.  1346.  N.  82. 


558  MODEBN  CHURCH  HISTOBT.    PER.  TL    A.  D.  164S-180iL 

America,  where,  under  the  name  of  Harmonisfs,  they  formed  a  oommnnity 
near  Pittsburg,  in  which  the  peasant  Rapp  (d.  1847)  exercised  a  patriarchal 
authority.  As  the  society  professed  to  hold  their  property  in  common,  the 
whole  direction  of  it  was  committed  to  him.  Even  marriages  could  not  be 
formed  without  his  consent.  (  jf)  The  peace  of  the  original  congregation  was  dis- 
turbed (1881)  by  Bemhard  Moller  (Prolf)^  who  had  formerly  lived  in  splendor  at 
Offenbach,  had  predicted  a  spiritual  universal  monarchy,  and  when  threatened 
with  a  legal  investigation,  had  gone  to  America.  There  he  had  been  received 
by  Rapp  as  a  prophet,  and  promised  the  younger  members  of  the  association 
with  a  true  community  of  goods  and  liberty  of  marriage.  Rapp  was  obliged 
to  purchase  a  separation  for  a  large  sum,  with  which  Proli  laid  the  foundation 
of  his  New  Jerusalem,  and  then  called  upon  all  believers  to  hasten  thither  to 
escape  the  vials  of  divine  wrath.  But  when  the  money  was  all  spent,  this 
vicegerent  of  God  announced  that  each  one  might  escape  as  he  could  (1888).  (q) 
Edward  Irriug  (1792-1884)  was  a  Presb3rterian  preacher  in  the  Caledonian 
chapel  in  London^  with  a  powerful  fancy  and  a  wild  antiquated  style  of  lan- 
guage, with  some  resemblance  to  that  of  the  ancient  prophets,  as  well  as  to 
that  of  Byron  and  SUakspeare.  He  soon  became  the  favorite  preacher  of  the 
higher  classes,  for  he  contended  against  the  wisdom  of  the  age,  which  he  sud 
was  elevating  the  fallen  archangel  Liberalism  above  Christ  the  morning  star. 
When  his  mind  became  absorbed  in  the  doctrine  that  the  Son  of  Crod  assumed 
our  sinful  nature,  although  without  detriment  to  his  holiness,  the  &shionable 
world  began  to  forsake  him.  His  extreme  longing  and  praying  for  the  spirit- 
ual gifts  Avhich  had  been  afforded  to  the  apostolic  Church,  as  the  signs  of  the 
approaching  kingdom  of  Christ,  seemed  at  last  to  call  them  forth.  As  in  for- 
mer days  at  Corinth,  individuals  spoke  with  tongues,  in  unintelligible  expres- 
sions (»f  a  religions  ecstasy  mingled  with  exclamations,  which  generally  closed 
with  prophecies  (1831).  The  Scotch  Presbytery  excluded  him  from  the  Cale- 
donian chapel  on  account  of  these  disturbances  of  public  worship  (1882),  and 
by  a  decision  of  the  General  Assembly  he  was  deposed  from  the  ministry  for 
doctrinal  errors.  He  now  established  a  church  of  his  own,  (r)  but  in  conse- 
quence of  a  new  outpouring  of  the  Holy  Spirit,  and  a  re-establishment  of  all 
those  ecclesiastical  offices  which  were  instituted  in  the  apostolic  age,  this 
soon  denied  its  original  founders,  and  arranged  itself  under  twelve  apostles 
and  an  order  of  prophets.  This  constitution  was  established  not  merely  for 
the  present,  but  for  all  future  times,  and  the  body  thus  constitnted  claimed  to  be 
the  true  Church  delivered  from  its  past  corruptions,  and  adorned  for  the  second 
advent  of  its  Lord.  In  England  this  movement  met  with  but  little  soocea, 
but  in  Geneva  a  class  of  persons  inclined  to  such  extravagances  became  dis- 
turbed by  it,  and  an  accomplished  orator  connected  with  the  German  ortho- 


p)  A.  K.  2:.  1882.  N.  9. 1828.  N.  87.  J.  Wagner^  Oesch.  d.  narmonlegMensch.  Watbincen  1881 
D.  A.  Z.  1847.  N.  251.  286.  BrL  K.  Z.  1850.  N.  49. 

9)  A.  K  Z.  1882.  N.  6&  188^  N.  186.  Der  Wandemuuiii  d  19.  Jhh.  ftx>m  tb«  EngL  of  Ki«ide- 
burg.  II»n.  l$.3a.  C.  v.  Bannhorst^  Scliildernng  d.  Abentlieurera  ProlL  Frk£  18&4.  [Wins^rmntr't 
Kel.  Denoinlnations  In  the  U.  8.  (Harrlsburg,  1S49.)  p.  9.] 

r)  .}f.  Ilohl,  Bruchst  a.  d.  Lebcn  a.  Schrr.  Irv.  8.  0«1L  1889.  Et.  KZ.  1889.  N.  SSm  97«.  empi 
1697.  N.  54811.  AcU  hist  ccc  1887.  p.  798s8.  {Jonu^  Biog.  Sketch  and  Bennon  of  Ed.  bv.  Lond. 
1885.8.] 


CHAP.  V.   SVANO.  CHURCH  TILL  1861.    §451.  IRVINGITEB.  WILDENSPUCH.    559 

doz  and  pietistic  school  embraced  its  principlee.  (»)  Attaching  themselves -to 
this  school,  the  angels  and  vice-angels  of  the  new  Church  founded  a  few 
chapels  in  Northern  Germany,  with  a  great  display  of  primitive  forms.  (One 
of  tJieee  established  in  Berlin  was  closed  in  1851.)  Their  followers,  however, 
never  hesitated  to  receive  the  sacrament  in  the  established  churches,  on  the 
ground  that  their  general  Church  was  to  be  gathered  fVoin  all  existing 
sects.  (0  On  the  other  hand,  those  appeals  which  were  sometimes  hoard  in 
«  few  Swedish  parishes  (1841-43)  among  the  young  people  of  both  sexes,  and 
even  among  children,  were  only  simple  and  often  affecting  calls  to  repent- 
ance, pathetically  spoken  or  sung  in  the  Scriptural  language  of  the  Chorch. 
Those  who  were  about  to  utter  them  were  at  first  seized  with  a  violent  pain 
in  their  heads  and  hearts,  accompanied  with  an  extreme  agony  on  account 
of  sin,  and  others  were  affected  in  a  similar  way  by  imitation  and  communi- 
cation with  each  other.  But  with  the  exception  of  some  who  counterfeited 
these  things  by  imitation,  the  speaking  was  generally  involuntary,  and  the 
speakers  were  unconscious  of  what  they  uttered,  in  the  midst  of  convulsions, 
huntings,  and  visions.  The  country-people  were  much  edified  by  such  scenes, 
and  took  offence  at  what  they  regarded  as  attempts  to  drive  away  the  Holy 
Ghost  (Joel  8,  Is)  by  medicines  for  the  body,  (u)  Although  in  other  places 
a  love  of  sin  was  sometimes  concealed  under  the  profession  of  extraordinary 
degrees  of  grace,  (r)  there  are  no  instances  of  positive,  sanguinary  or  lascivi- 
ous excesses,  except  where  the  authors  of  them  passed  from  this  general  class 
into  other  sects.  Margaretta  Peter^  the  daughter  of  a  peasant  in  Wildeni- 
ptichy  of  the  canton  of  Zurich,  became  powerfully  excited  by  her  intercourse 
with  persons  professedly  awakened,  and  by  tracts  of  an  enthusiastic  charac- 
ter, till,  in  her  anxiety  for  the  spiritual  salvation  of  the  world,  she  looked 
forward  to  the  occurrence  of  extraordinary  events.  Her  intellectual  energy 
and  decision  of  character  induced  many  pious  persons  of  the  surrounding 
country  to  honor  her  as  a  saint,  and  even  the  consequences  of  a  night  spent 
in  adultery  did  not  destroy  her  confidence  in  herself.  This  feeling  of  her 
own  importance  induced  her  with  her  followers  to  contend  with  Satan,  by 
means  of  carnal  weapons,  to  have  her  own  believing  sister  slain,  and  with 
wonderful  heroism  to  have  herself  crucified,  according  to  what  she  deemed  a 
divine  command,  that  she  might  save  thousands  of  souls  by  the  sacrifice  of 
Christ  once  more  in  her  person  (1828).  (?f)  It  was  rumored  in  Konigsburg 
that  two  clergymen,  who  professed  the  exclusive  kind  of  Christianity,  had 
introduced  shameless  mysteries  into  a  pietistic  circle.  The  legal  investigation, 
which  was  attended  with  great  difficulties  on  account  of  the  distinguished 
persons  accused  (after  1835),  brought  nothing  to  light,  except  that  sensual 

•)  ThUrtcK,  Yorlesa.  CL  Kath.  u.  Prot  1S4&  2  Abtli.  [Kling,  Thiersch.  (Stod.  ii.  Krit  1&49.  If. 
1.)    O.  ReicK,  d.  Irvlnglsm.  u.  a.  ro).  Charakter.  (Ibid.  p.  19dss.)   Ev.  K.  Z.  Dec.  18(7.  and  Jan.  1843.] 

0  Ue.  d.  Rathscbhira.  Gottea  m.  d.  Erde.  Schaffh.  FrkC  1846«.  2  vol&  J.  Hooper,  d.  Entruekang 
n.  YermandL  d.  lebonden  Heillgen.  BrI.  1947.  Acten«tucke  d.  Minist  d.  geistl  Angcleg.  Brl.  1850.  p. 
Mmw— Tboluck'a  Lit  Anz.  184&  N.  81.  Brl.  K.  Z.  1849.  N.  88.  7&  1850.  N.  18. 

tt)  Dl«  PredigtKrankh.  (with  the  Liter,  in  Bruns.  Rep.  1845w  vol  IIL  pi  170.  270a8.)  £▼.  K.  Z. 
VMIL  N.  Mn  Cr.  1846.  N.  19s8.  Brl.  K.  Z.  1847.  N.  18a. 

«)  Bhelnir.  Rep.  1885.  vol  X.  p.  49. 

ui)  J.  L.  Meyer^  schwinn.  Oreaetooeneii  in  Wlldensp.  Zur.  2  ed.  1824.  A.  K.  Z.  1828.  N.  2S.  418l 
IML  St.  K.  Z.  1881.  N.  26m. 


560  MODEBN  CHURCH  HI8T0BY.    P£K  TL    A.  D.  1648-1386. 

passions  bad  been  excited  under  the  forms  of  devotion,  in  order  to  regain  the 
innocence  of  the  original  Paradise.  It  also  appeared  that  the  preacher  Ebel 
(b.  1784),  as  the  highly  privileged  chief  nature,  had  exercised  a  despotic 
control  over  the  consciences  of  the  others,  and  tliat  the  fundamental  princi- 
ple of  their  faith  was  a  philosophic  fancy  produced  by  a  pious  but  eccentric 
being  named  Schoenherr  (1771-1820),  respecting  the  origin  of  the  universe 
from  the  mingling  of  two  primordial  beings  of  a  spiritual  and  sensuous  na- 
ture as  Eloahs.  (j)  In  Saxony^  was  Stephen  (1777-1846),  the  pastor  of  a 
Bohemian  church  in  Dresden,  a  stranger  and  an  enemy  to  the  polite  litera- 
ture of  the  age,  but  familiar  with  the  Scriptures  and  the  old  Church  of 
Luther,  who  knew  well  how  to  excite  ordinary  minds  by  his  simple  and  im- 
pressive eloquence,  and  to  rule  them  with  keen  intelligence  and  firm  decision. 
He  became  a  centre  for  pietistio  Lutherauism,  at  that  time  new  in  this  region, 
but  propagated  there  by  means  of  young  clergymen  and  foreigners.  Wherever 
it  prevailed,  every  natural  bond  was  relaxed  for  its  exclusive  interest.  When 
the  government  (after  1830)  ceased  to  favor  this  class  of  persons,  and  Ste- 
phen found  himself  threatened  with  prosecution,  professing  to  speak  by  divine 
direction,  he  commanded  his  followers  to  leave  the  country,  as  they  oould  not 
there  maintain  the  Lutheran  faith  in  its  purity,  nor  transmit  it  to  theur  pos- 
terity. Most  of  the  clergymen  who  had  been  connected  with  his  society  now 
renounced  his  doctrines,  on  the  ground  that  they  were  identical  with  ancient 
Donatism,  and  enjoined  a  flying  from  the  cross.  Others  followed  Stephen 
with  about  six  hundred  members  of  their  congregations,  in  the  autumn  of 
1838,  from  what  they  considered  as  the  land  of  Egypt  to  North  America. 
When  he  had,  as  their  bishop,  established  a  system  of  unlimited  despotism 
both  in  spiritual  and  secular  atl'airs,  he  too  soon  gave  a  loose  rein  to  his  licen- 
tious passions.  No  sooner  was  his  scandalous  conduct  made  known  by  means 
of  women  who  had  fallen  or  been  abused  by  him,  than  his  government  was 
at  an  end.  After  his  deposition  and  expulsion  (May,  1839),  the  clergy  at- 
tempted to  seize  the  reins  of  power,  but  the  ideal  of  a  Wittenberg  on  the  Mis- 
sissippi had  become  nearly  effaced  from  their  minds,  and  the  better  dasa,  on 
witnessing  Stephen's  fall,  became  conscious  of  their  ovm  guilt.  They  firmly 
adhered  to  Lutheranism  as  the  only  true  form  of  Christianity,  and,  after  a 
long  period  of  distraction,  those  who  survived  formed  a  general  connection 
by  a  synod,  but  maintained  a  bitter  controversy  with  those  clergymen  who 
were  exiles  for  the  same  faith,  (y) 

§  452.     Undecided  Co jit rovers ies  leticeen  Old  and  New  Protestantism, 

The  controversy  which  had  previously  been  maintained  principally  on 
scientific  principles,  and  with  an  acknowledgment  of  a  conmnon  Christian 
ground  between  Rationalism  and  Supematuralism,  was  now  so  far  changed 


cr)  A.  K.  Z.  1835.  N.  177.  Ev.  K.  Z.  183ft.  N.  10.  (^4.  F.  r.  WeffMm)  ZuverL  Mltth.  0.  Schanb. 
Lcbcn  u.  Ttiea'*.  sowie  u.  d.  eccUr.  Umtxiebe  zu  Konlgsb.  (Zciisch.  t  hist  Th.  18S&,  P.  2.)  Kogsbi 
1839. 

3^)  L,  r.  LutkemvUer^  Lehrcn  u.  Umtrlebe d.  Stepbanisten  AltcDl>.  1S88.  O.  PUistner^  dio  FnMti- 
ker  iui  Muldenthalc  AIt«nb.  1839.  /^  i^t«cA4*r,  d.  falscbe  M&rtyrertb.  LpA.  1880.  («.  iV><«iM)  IM»  d£ 
Meinang  u.  Slopb.  Ibid.  1840.  C.  E.  Vehse^  d.  StephanBche  AiuwuideruDg.  Drsd.  1840.  Bii  K. 
Z.  1811.  N.  7.  83.  86. 1845.  X.  85.    Uaue,  meissn.  KGeecb.  Lps.  1847.  vol.  IL  pi  881  410ia. 


CHAP.  y.    EYANO.  CHURCH  TILL  1858.    i4Si,  HARMd.    CLAUSEN.  561 

that  it  was  carried  on  among  the  common  people,  and  was  a  contest  for  the 
very  existence  of  the  Church.  It  was  also  so  arranged,  that  on  one  side  were 
involved  many  principles  of  Christian  freedom,  and  on  the  other  those  of  • 
ecclesiastical  piety.  Many  irrelevant  matters  were  introduced  into  the  de- 
hate.  The  Church  party  brought  forth  a  murderer,  who  confessed  that  his 
rationalism  had  been  the  occasion  of  his  crime ;  and  on  the  other  hand,  it 
was  obliged  to  hear  its  religious  conversions  ridiculed,  and  to  see  many  pain- 
ful things  in  the  domestic  life  of  its  members  held  up  to  public  gaze,  (a)  The 
rnic  ground  of  the  contention,  however,  was  the  revolution  taking  place  in 
public  feeling.  Even  a  liberal-minded  statesman  expressed  a  wish  ^^  that 
about  a  dozen  Rationalists  might  be  placed  extra  ttatum  nocemUy  (h)  On 
the  part  of  the  Rationalists,  a  new  symbol  had  been  brought  forward,  which 
the  orthodox  declared  to  be  inconsistent  with  a  standing  in  the  Church,  (c) 
1.  Clans  Harms  of  Kiel  (b.  1778),  an  imaginative,  popular  preacher  of  the 
old  coclesiastical  school  of  piety,  and  endowed  with  a  remarkable  facility  of 
expression,  (d)  celebrated  the  Jubilee  of  the  Reformation  by  propounding 
ninety-five  new  theses,  in  which  the  doctrines  of  the  total  depravity  of  man 
and  the  indispensable  necessity  of  faith  were  maintained  in  opposition  to  the 
unbelief  and  rationalism  of  the  age.  The  various  forms  in  which  these  were 
opposed,  revealed  how  utterly  foreign  this  system  of  faith  was  to  the  temper 
of  the  age,  and  how  far  even  those  who  at  first  seemed  pleased  with  this 
attack  upon  the  contemporary  spirit  had  embraced  Pelagian  sentiments,  and 
were  estranged  from  the  doctrines  of  Luther.  The  power  of  the  orthodox 
party  became  gradually  established  in  Holstein,  and  its  adherents  found  con- 
solation in  the  Oath  of  17G4,  which  avowed  a  strict  adherence  to  the  original 
Confession  of  Augsburg,  while  the  more  liberal  interpreters  of  the  Scriptures 
appealed  to  the  Agenda  of  1797,  and  a  series  of  legal  enactments  put  forth 
since  that  time  in  the  same  spirit,  (e)  2.  In  Denmark^  the  new  Theology 
had  been  quietly  propagated,  when  Prof.  Clausen^  in  a  clear  and  learned 
work  upon  the  conflicting  opinions  prevailing  in  the  churches,  pointed  out 
the  spirit  of  Protestantism  as  the  proper  independent  development  of  the 
religions  spirit.  (/)  On  the  other  hand,  Grundtvig,  a  man  of  a  poetical  tem- 
perament, well  versed  in  the  ancient  history  of  his  country,  violent  and  yet 
liberal  in  his  disposition,  in  the  name  of  the  Church  protested  against  the 
positions  token  in  that  work,  and  maintained  that  Clausen  had  placed  himself 
at  the  head  of  all  those  who  were  hostile  to  the  word  of  God,  and  that  his 
Protestant  Church  was  merely  a  self-constructed  castle  of  pleasure,  and  a 
temple  of  idols.  When  he  was  brought  before  the  civil  courts  to  answer  for 
tliese  assertions,  he  resigned  his  pastoral  otfice,  and  was  condemned  for  libel 


a)  A.  K.  Z.  1823.  Lit  BI.  N.  77.  Ev.  K.  Z.  1830.  N.  100.  4a  (B«richt  CL  d.  Umtriebe  d.  Fromm- 
ler.  io  Halle.  Altenb.  1880.) 

b)  Freih.  ▼.  Slain  an  Oagern.  Stuttg.  1S83.  p.  804.  815.  846. 

e)  Bdhr,  Orund-  a.  Olaobcns-SuUe  d.  ev.  prot  K.  Neost  (1882.)  8  ed.  1848. 

d)  Stad.  a.  Krit  1S88:  P.  8.    K.  l/arm§,  Lebensbesclir.  v.  ihm  aelhet.  KieU  1851. 

4)  SckrddUr,  Archiv  d.  Ilarmsclion  Thc«en.  Alton.  181&  £v.  K  Z.  1829.  N.  59.  8088.— /te«A<Mr 
K.  Q.  Schnlbbtt  a.  1844.  Norddeutsche  Monatsscbr.  zur  FOrder.  d.  fVoien  Protestant  sl  1845.  Comiii 
Reri.  K.  Z.  lS4e.  N.  loa   Ev.  K.  Z.  1S4&  N.  22. 

/)  Kathollclsm.  og  Protest  KirkcforfenlDg,  Lare  og  Bitna.  KJobenh.  1825.  8  vols.  aben.  r.  JWet, 
StxuL  1898«.  8  Tola 

86 


562  MODERN  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  VL    A.  D.  164»-165a 

(1826).  The  orientalist  Lindherg  accused  Clausen  of  the  violation  of  his 
ordination  vows,  and  held  every  person  responsible  for  the  consequences 
"  who  were  witnesses  of  the  corrupting  influence,  without  opposition  to  it." 
For  this  he  was  accused  of  an  attempt  to  excite  discontent  against  the  gov- 
ernment, but  Avas  acquitted  in  the  courts  of  justice  (1880).  Although  this 
party  obtained  but  little  public  favor,  it  was  much  promoted  by  the  holding 
of  conventicles,  and  at  last  Grundtvig  received  permission  to  hold  ser- 
vices for  divine  worship  (1832).  A  leader  of  the  opposition  in  the  Diet  then 
endeavored  by  some  liberal  means  to  get  the  control  of  this  church  of  the 
people  for  himself  alone,  and  vented  his  rage  against  every  thing  of  German 
origin,  {g)  8.  In  an  academic  disputation  at  Leijmc,  it  was  asserted  that  the 
Rationalists  were  actually  dismissed  from  the  Church.  This  assertion  was 
afterwards  modified,  and  it  was  said  that  they  were  bound  in  conscience 
voluntarily  to  leave  the  Church,  but  in  the  replies  it  called  forth,  even  thb 
was  shown  to  bo  inconsistent  with  Protestantism  and  with  Christianity 
itself,  (h)  But  the  object  of  its  authors  was  more  perfectly  discovered  by 
an  article  in  the  Evangelical  Church  Journal,  in  which  Gesenins,  the  distin- 
guished founder  of  the  modern  school  of  oriental  literature  in  Germany,  and 
Wegscheider,  wore  denounced  for  ridiculing  Christianity,  and  for  perverting 
the  minds  of  the  youth.  Though  this  article  was  evidently  designed  to 
induce  the  civil  authorities  to  interfere  in  the  cose,  nothing  but  an  admoni- 
tion addressed  to  public  teachers  in  general  was  ever  put  forth  from  that 
quarter,  and  not  only  the  assailed  professors,  but  the  most  highly  esteemed 
writers  and  speakers  in  behalf  of  nearly  the  whole  body  of  Protestant 
divines,  protested  against  such  a  turn  of  the  controversy,  and  advocated  the 
freedom  of  scientific  discussion.  On  the  part  of  those  who  had  raised  the 
complaint,  it  was  said  that  the  freedom  of  instruction  claimed  was  nothing 
but  oppression,  when  its  bearing  upon  the  congregations  was  regarded,  and 
that  the  Church  could  not  endure  that  its  future  pastors  should  be  taught  the 
very  reverse  of  what  they  were  afterwards  bound  to  preach.  (/)  4.  In  Ifenf^ 
Cassel^  the  orthodox  party  lost  its  political  support  when  the  ministry  of 
Hassonpflug  was  overthrown.  When  the  government,  in  concert  with  the 
consistories,  imposed  upon  ministers  about  to  be  settled  the  obligation  to  con- 
form themselves  to  the  Scriptures,  "  with  a  conscientious  regard  to  the  au- 
thorized standards  of  faith  "(1838),  a  learned  and  practical  jurist  came  for- 
ward at  the  bead  of  a  party,  demanding  the  very  reverse.  To  save  the  unity 
and  even  the  legal  existence  of  the  Evangelical  Church,  which  he  believed 
would  be  endangered  by  an  arbitrary  change  in  the  existing  law,  Bickell  de- 
manded that  an  authentic  interpretation  should  be  given,  according  to  which 


g)  Ev.  K-  Z.  1827.  N.  51a.  1828.  N.  55a.  1880.  N.  978a.  104.  1881.  N.  69aa.  1882.  N.  49».  A.  K.  l> 
1828.  N.  193.  1830.  N  49.  1S81.  N.  428s.  1882.  Lit  Bl.  N.  101.  1884.  N.  111.  Stnd.  u.  Krit  1S84  P.  4 
^  995S9.    Rudelhach  in  d.  Zeitsch.  f.  luth.  Thcol.  1841.  P.  1.— BrL  K.  Z.  184S.  N.  6a 

ti)  Ifahn :  de  rationaHsml  vera  indole.  Lps.  1827.  And.  ev.  K.  zunichst  In  Prennen  xl  Saobarn.  Lpft> 
1827.  (  V^olkmann)  Der  Rationalist  kein  ev.  Christ  L.  1S2S.— (/Aim)  Die  Leipz.  DispaUtlon.  I4&  ISJT. 
K'nig,  phil.  Gntnchten  in  Sachsen  d.  Rat  n.  Sapern.  Lps.  1827.  (CUttt^n)  Llcht  o.  Schaften.  L|*  IW'- 

I)  Ev.  K.  Z.  1830.  N.  6s.  15.  18s.  84.  54s.  59.  69.  8488.  948.  A.  K.  Z.  1881.  N.  9.  VoU  by  Bret- 
Schneider,  Neander,  Ullmann,  Schott,  B.  Crasiiia,  Schnltz,  Culln.  Q.  a.  On  theotfaer  ^e:  Budd- 
bach^  d.  Wescn  d.  Rational  Lpo.  1880. 


CHAP.  V.    EVANG.  CHURCH  TILL  1858L     1 4S2.  ALTENBUBO.    HAMBURG.    563 

the  authorized  confessions  should  be  acknowledged  to  be  in  substance  the 
standard  of  doctrine.    HenJcel  declared  that  the  Avgustana  was  as  anthorita- 
tive  as  the  Carolina^  and  appealed  to  an  assembly  of  his  fellow-citizens  (Ang. 
14,  1839),  which  presented  a  petition  to  the  electoral  princes,  praying  for 
some  explanation  which  should  tranquillize  the  public  mind,  and  for  the  con- 
vocation of  a  general  synod.   By  these  means  they  hoped  that  all  authoritative 
creeds  might  be  abolished,  that  the  doctrines  preached  by  the  clergy  might 
be  made  negatively  dependent  upon  the  will  of  their  congregations,  and  that 
all  parochial  compulsion  in  these  matters  might  be  taken  away.    But  not 
only  the  views  of  the  government,  but  the  sentiments  of  the  people  were 
opposed  to  both  these  demande.     When  Hassenpflug  undertook  the  re-estab- 
lishment of  Old  Hessia  (1850),  the  ancient  form  of  oath  was  introduced,  and 
every  thing  received  the  precise  ecclesiastical  coloring  of  the  old  Covenant 
of  Fidelity  (Treubunds-Farbung).  {k)    5.  In  Saxe  Altenhurg^  a  Consistorial 
rescript  was  addressed  (Nov.  13,  1888)  to  the  Ephori  of  Ronnebnrg,  in  which 
the  emigration  under  Stephen  was  traced  to  the  dissatisfaction  produced  by 
an  unauthorized  mode  of  performing  parochial  duties,  and  the  preachers  were 
admonished  to  instruct  their  people  in  the  essential  and  fundamental  doc- 
trines of  Christianity.    The  explanation  of  this  document  by  persons  from 
without,  provoked  the  patriotic  spirits  of  a  few  clergymen  to  a  lively  oppo- 
sition.   The  opinions  of  four  theological  faculties  were  solicited  by  the  gov- 
ernment, with  regard  to  the  conduct  of  the  consistory  and  its  opponents. 
The  only  reply  favorable  to  a  rigidly  orthodox  sense  was  sent  by  the  faculty 
of  Beriin,  and  even  that  body  was  by  no  means  unanimous.    As  these  opin- 
ions were  published  with  a  noble  confidence  by  the  government,  and  every 
attempt  at  legal  proceedings  on  the  subject  was  suppressed,  the  minds  of  the 
people  were  tranquillized.  (0    6.  In  Hamburg^  an  excitement  was  created  by 
an  attack  by  sbme  Pietists  in  a  literary  publication  upon  what  was  called  the 
pretended  Christian  life  of  the  multitude,  and  upon  Rationalism,  which  was 
denominated  a  snake  in  the  house  of  the  Lord  (1839).    When  two  candidates 
presented  themselves,  and  an  opportunity  was  thus  given  for  an  attack,  the 
party  favorable  to  the  old  faith  used  all  the  means  which  could  be  employed 
in  a  free  state  to  piocure  their  rejection,  on  the  ground  that  they  had  vio- 
lated their  oaths.    But  when  they  declared  that  they  would,  as  hitherto,  con- 
form according  to  their  conscientious  convictions  to  the  Bible  and  the  Cate- 
chism, both  the  ecclesiastical  and  civil  authorities  were  satisfied,  since  it 
could  not  be  denied  that  the  usage  of  a  half  century  was  in  opposition  to  the 
legal  authority  of  the  symbolical  books.     One  pietistic  candidSite  was  sus- 
pended until  he  should  pledge  himself  to  observe  in  future  the  respect  due  to 
the  ecclesiastical  ministry,  and  which  had  been  disregarded  in  the  course  of 


t)  J.  W.  Blekdl,  Q.  d.  Yerpflicht  d.  Gebtl.  k.  d.  symb.  Bchrr.  Cam.  (IS39.)  1340.  On  the  other 
Aide:  K.  T.  Buyrhofferin  2  krit  Belenchtangen.  Lp&  1889.  F.  IT.  Meurer,  e.  Wort  Q.  LehrfreUi. 
in  d.  ev.  K.  Cass.  1839.—  W.  Viimar,  d.  Kurhesa.  K.  Kasa.  1845.  W.  MUntcher,  Gesch.  d.  faesn.  T«f* 
K.  CasA.  ISSO.  Brl  K.  Z.  1851.  N.  47. 

I)  Berl  K.  Z.  1889.  N.  la.  81.  C.  W,  KldtMner,  z.  Ehrcnrettnng  e.  veranglimpften  chrlBtL  GL 
a.  Predi^weise.  Lps.  1839.  J.  Schxideroff,  an  den  H.  Dr.  Ilt^sekiel  In  Altenb.  Lpa.  1889.  Bedenkea 
d.  theoL  Fmc.  Jena,  Berl.  Otitt  a.  Ueidelb.  Nebat  Actenst&cken.  Altenb.  1889.  PaxUiu^  Motlv.  6iit> 
ftchten.  Maimh.  1839.    a  UUmcmn^  d.  Alteak  Angelegenh.  (Stad.  a.  Krlt  18Mi  P.  %.) 


564  MODERN  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  YL    A.  D.  164S-1868. 

this  controversy,  (m)  On  the  other  hand,  in  Bremen^  when  the  yonnger 
Krummacher,  in  the  fervency  of  his  zeal  against  those  whom  he  called  the 
priests  of  Baal,  pronounced  the  apostle's  cnrse  (Gal.  1,  8)  npon  the  whole 
antichristian  spirit  of  the  age,  although  the  liberal  Protestantism  rigidly 
secured  its  rights  against  a  new  priestly  and  Jewish  system,  the  m^ority  of 
the  clergy  in  the  city  and  country,  to  distinguish  themselves  from  such  as 
tliey  regarded  as  unbelievers  in  Christianity,  formed  an  orthodox  confession 
(1840).  {it)  When  the  Reformed  congregation  at  Liebfrauen,  during  the 
spring- tide  of  popular  feeling  in  1848,  and  in  a  popular  election  without  the 
ordinary  established  forms,  called  Dulon  of  Magdeburg  to  become  its  pastor, 
and  when  he  was  installed  without  pledging  himself  to  any  creed,  the  char- 
acter of  the  candidate  (o)  and  the  object  of  the  congregation  could  no  longer 
be  concealed.  The  old  priest-church  was  derided  as  a  corpse,  from  whose 
grave  alone  new  life  could  be  expected,  and  the  faith  of  their  forefathers  wad 
estimated  only  in  the  light  of  circumstances  tlie  reverse  of  what  originally 
existed.  A  small  amount  of  intelligence,  and  a  popular  style  of  eloquence, 
were  sufficient  to  enable  such  a  man  to  become  a  religious  demagogue,  who 
professed  to  preach  a  Christianity  which  knew  no  vulgar  class,  and  whoso 
apotheosis  he  completed,  and  whose  holiest  service  he  performed,  when  he 
endeavored  to  inspire  men  with  a  burning  hatred  to  despotism,  and  to  enlist 
them  in  an  enthusiastic  struggle  for  a  free  state,  a  secular  redemption,  in 
which  every  enjoyment  of  life  might  be  shared  by  all.  {p)  An  accusation 
was  preferred  against  him  (April,  1851)  by  twenty-three  members  of  his  con- 
gregation, who  demanded  that  the  Church  should  be  protected  against  him 
as  an  enemy  to  Christianity.  Dulon  denied  that  the  Senate,  which  in  similar 
circumstances  (1845)  had  decided  that  a  preacher  should  never  venture  in 
his  public  instructions  beyond  the  degree  of  intelligence  which  prevailed 
among  his  people,  had  any  right  to  interfere  in  theological  controversies.  He 
alleged  that,  according  to  the  Constitution  of  1849,  and  the  laws  of  the  Re- 
formed Church,  in  which  no  obligation  to  a  particular  creed  was  required,  t 
pastor  was  responsible  only  to  his  congregation,  and  that  the  great  m^oritj 
of  his  people  were  opposed  to  the  accusation,  {q)  The  Senate  applied  to  tbe 
theological  faculty  of  Heidelberg  for  an  opinion  upon  the  case,  and  when  this 
sustained  the  accusation,  (r)  Dulon  was  deposed  (April,  1852),  on  the  groond 

m)  Rheinw.  Rep.  vol  XXVII.  p.  286fl&  XXXY.  ISSes.  Et.  K.  Z.  1839.  N.  686i  S7. 134a  N.  14& 
51&  A.  K.  Z.  1S40.  p.  66.  M.  U.  IluflttcaUksr,  Protest  in  VermnlaasaDg  d.  neaesten  kirchL  EreigiL 
in  Hamb.  Umb,  1839.  //  SchMden,  d.  prot  K.  n.  d.  eymb.  B.  zunicbst  in  Bez.  a.  If amb.  Hmb.  ISHX 

n)  Berl  K.  Z.  1S40.  N.  76.  82.  85.  91.  F.  W.  KrummacKer  :  Paalas  kein  Mann  naeh  d.  SinM 
anserer  ZeiL  S  ed.  Brem.  1840.  TheoL  Eeplik  an  PanieL  Elbif  18401  Dor  ScbeinbeiL  Ratiooalim. 
vor  d.  Richterstahle  d  H.  8.  Ibid.  1841.  J,  GUdemeUUr^  Blendwerke  d.  volgaren  RattonaL  i.  Be- 
•citignng  d.  Paul  Anathema.  BerL  184L— /*.  IT.  PanUl:  8  Sootagspr.  S  ed.  Bert  lS4a  *  Ubtct* 
holene  Benrth.  d.  sogon.  tbeoL  Replik.  BerL  l&4a  W.  JS,  Weher,  die  Yerflocbangiea.  S  ed.  BerL 
1840.  Bremisches  Magazin  £  ev.  Wahrh.  v.  Paniel,  Rothe,  Weber.  184188.  8  P.— BekenntoiaB  Brem. 
Paatoren  in  Sacbsen  d.  Wahrh.  BerL  184a  Rbeinw.  Rep.  toL  XLIL  p.  97.  MaOtt,  ftkr  Stepbaai 
Gemeinde.  Br.  1860. 

o)  R.  Dulon,  d.  Gel  tang  d.  Bekenntnisschr.  in  d.  re£  K.  Magdeb.  1847. 

p)  Yom  Kampfe  d.  Vulkerfireih.  e.  Lebrb.  flirsdeutBche  Yolk.  Br.  1849&  2  H.  6  ed.  185L  Die  re£ 
K,  n.  Mallet  a.  Ich.  Br.  (ISSa)  1S51.    Der  Wecker,  ein  8onntagsbL  &  Sept  185a 

q)  BrL  KZ.  1850.  N.  81  45.  59. 

r)  Gatacbten  d.  theoL  Fak.  d.  UniT.  Heidelb.  0.  Dulon.  with  PraeC  by  BchankaL  Heidclbi  189i 

the  other  aide:  Dvlon^  d.  Gatacbten  d.  Tlor.  beid.  Theologw.  Br.  V«(k 


CHAP.  V.    EVANO.  CHURCH  TILL  185a    $458.  DULON.    81NTENIS.  565 

that  his  course  led  to  agitation,  and  was  dangerous  to  public  safety,  and  he 
was  forbidden  the  performance  of  any  duties  as  a  preacher  or  an  instructor 
within  the  bounds  of  the  republic.  (*)  Even  if  this  proceeding  be  regarded 
as  of  questionable  propriety  according  to  the  legal  ordinances  then  in 
force,  (0  it  was  certainly  the  natural  result  of  the  revolution  which  had  then 
taken  place  in  public  affairs.  7.  In  Magdeburg^  when  a  work  of  art  was  ex- 
hibited, Sintenis^  the  pastor  of  the  Church  of  the  Holy  Ghost,  maintained  in 
a  public  journal  that  the  worship  of  Christ  was  a  superstition  not  taught  in 
the  gospels  (1810).  This  was  generally  regarded  as  a  gross  impropriety,  but 
a  few  distinguished  persons  in  their  zeal  denounced  it  in  the  pulpit  as  a  trea- 
son against  the  CJjurch.  When  the  consistory  required  that  Sintenis  should 
acknowledge  his  views  to  be  inconsistent  with  his  office  in  the  Church,  and 
promise  that  he  would  in  future  preach  nothing  which  should  not,  as  far  as 
he  could  ascertain  from  the  authorized  creeds,  be  consistent  Avith  the  doc- 
trines of  the  Bible,  under  penalty  of  a  suspension  from  his  office,  the  city 
thought  that  Protestant  freedom  of  instruction  was  impaired,  and  that  the 
whole  was  intended  to  place  exclusive  {)Owcr  in  the  hands  of  the  pietistic 
party.  The  ecclesiastical  superintendents  and  the  magistrates  therefore 
brought  a  complaint  against  the  consistor}'  before  the  Bureau  of  Public  Wor- 
aliip,  on  the  ground  that  it  had  treated  human  enactments  as  if  they  were  of 
equal  authority  with  the  sacred  Scriptures,  and  that  consequently  the  Pro- 
testantism of  Magdeburg,  once  so  dearly  purchased,  was  in  peril.  But  when 
this  department  censored  the  conduct  of  Sintenis  as  a  pastoral  indiscretion, 
and  admonished  those  who  were  zealous  for  orthodoxy  to  abstain  from  every 
thing  inconsistent  with  existing  rules,  the  excitement  was  allayed,  (u) — In 
all  part«  of  Germany  it  was  only  needful  that  some  inflammatory  word 
should  be  uttered  to  produce  a  local  explosion.  The  old  Protestantism  in  its 
renovated  form,  had  in  its  favor  the  written  law,  the  religious  enthusiasm  of 
the  people,  and  sometimes  also  the  protection  of  eminent  civil  authorities, 
while  the  new  Protestantism  had  the  usages  of  almost  a  century,  the  mod- 
em improvements  in  science,  the  revolutionary  principles  started  at  the 
Reformation,  and  generally,  where  freedom  of  conscience  was  threatened,  the 
masses  of  the  third  estate,  who  rose  in  defence  of  such  freedom.  The  ortho- 
dox style  of  preaching  had  become  so  strange  in  particular  cities,  that  some 
pastors  who  used  it  fell  out  with  their  congregations  and  were  dismissed  from 
them,  (v)  and  sometimes  a  city  otherwise  diligent  in  the  practice  of  religion 
and  in  its  works  of  charity,  protested  in  a  legal  form  against  the  Apostles^ 
Creed,  on  account  of  its  antiquated  character,  (tr)  In  the  principality  of 
» 

#)  Brl.  KZ.  1859.  N.  20.  21.  A.  KZ.  1852.  N.  70. 

0  DiUenberger,  Votum  in  d.  tbeol.  Fac  d.  U.  Ileldelb.  CL  D.  Hdlb.  1852.  On  the  other  sido: 
Bchenktl,  d.  Schntzpfllcht  d.  Staats  gegen  d.  ev.  K.  Ileldelb.  1852. 

ti)  Er.  K.  Z.  1840.  N.  208.  43.  Mjjl  67a.  A.  K.  Z.  1840.  N.  eiaa.  {TKeune)  Urkonden  0.  d.  Ver- 
&liren  d.  Constat,  zn  Magd.  gcgen  Sintenis,  v.  e.  Frennde  (L  Wahrheit  Lpa.  1840.  Mittbeilungen  u.  d. 
YeraoL  d.  kirebL  Aofreg.  za  Magd.  Darmat  1841.— Der  Biscbof  Dr&fleke  a.  &  actjihr.  Wirkcn  iiu 
Preaaa.  Staat  v.  G.  v.  C.  {Kf'miff.)  Berg<>n.  1840. 

«)  Tkoluck,  Liter.  Anzeigor.  1885.  N.  47.  Acta  hist  ecc  1885.  p.  4418&  Rheinw.  Kep.  vuL  V. 
p.  129b«.  vol.  XVIII.  p.  2S8S.  ISIm. 

to)  BrL  KZ.  1844  N.  28. 1845.  N.  23.  Ev.  KZ  1844  N.  4fi.  54  Rudelbach,  tL  d.  Bedeut  d.  Ap 
gjrmb.  Mit  Bez.  a.  d.  Leipziger  Confeasionawirren.  UaL  1844 


566  MODifiN  CHUBCn  UISTOBY.    FEB.  YL    A.  D.  1M&-186& 

Lippe^  five  preachers,  who  had  demanded  the  re-introdnction  of  the  Heidel- 
berg Catechisro,  instead  of  the  liberal  catechism  which  had  been  used  for  a 
generation  past,  and  had  protested  (1844)  against  the  sparions  official  oath 
respecting  the  creed  which  had  for  some  time  been  publicly  administered, 
and  against  the  limitation  of  the  ecclesiastical  power  of  the  keys,  were  gam- 
moned before  the  consistory  as  ecclesiastical  demagogues,  and  after  humbliiig 
themselves,  they  were  admonished  carefully  to  observe  the  regulations  of  the 
Church.  Private  members  were  also  informed  that  it  did  not  belong  to 
them,  with  their  limited  knowledge  of  such  subjects,  to  give  a  judgment 
respecting  them,  (x) 

§  458.    Pruma,  ilie  Union  and  the  Agenda  till  1840.     ^<mt.  from  §  414. 

J.  JacobBOfi,  Oesch.  d.  Qucllen  d.  ev.  KKeclits  d.  Pror.  Preiusen  n.  Poa.  Kra^esb.  1S39. 
V.  MiihUr,  Qcfch  d.  ev.  KYerf.  d.  Yark  Brandenb.  Weim.  "iSit—Bdclul^  Ireneon.  BrL  182 Im.  8 
Tola.  K.  F.  Gaitpp,  d.  Union  d.  dcutachen  K.  BrsL  1S4&  K.  SemUch,  &.  d.  UBionsTifTSQelie  b«&.  in 
PreuaseiL  Orel&w.  1S52.    C.  J.  KiUsch^  Urkundenb.  d.  ev.  Union.  Bonn.  1859. 

Under  Frederic  II.,  Prussia  had  become,  in  consequence  of  its  natural 
position,  the  most  prominent  of  the  Protestant  powers.  Fredtric  William 
II.  (1797-1840),  having  found  consolation  under  his  severe  losses  in  the  sta- 
ble word  of  God,  wished,  after  his  government  had  become  re-established, 
and  he  had  become  rather  jealous  of  its  free  development^  that  the  Church 
might  be  thoroughly  regenerated.  Though  he  felt  some  dislike  to  tlie  unsta- 
ble character  of  Protestant  freedom,  and  especially  to  the  high-wrought  ^irit 
of  Pietism,  he  was  sincerely  attached  to  Luther's  honest  and  steadfast  faith, 
and  with  pious  conscientiousness,  under  the  influence  of  the  writings  of  the 
reformers,  sometimes  conducted  the  affairs  of  the  Church  with  his  own 
hands.  He  was,  however,  generally  assisted  by  the  gentle  Altenstein,  his 
minister  for  public  worship,  with  whose  prefei'ences  for  the  Hegelian  phi- 
losophy in  the  Church  and  in  the  schools  he  was  often  displeased,  but  whom 
ho  never  would  quite  abandon,  {a)  When  the  civil  power  bad  absorbed  all 
authorities  peculiarly  ecclesiastical  (1809),  the  king  established  (1817)  pro- 
vincial consistories,  whose  duties  were  confined  to  matters  exclusively  spirit- 
ual, and  did  not  include  the  location  of  clergymen ;  district  and  provincial 
synods,  composed  only  of  clergymen,  and  restricted  within  a  narrow  circle 
of  duties,  but  intended  to  be  an  introduction  to  an  imperial  synod  ;  {h)  and  a 
ministry  for  public  worship,  which  was  to  be  the  organ  through  which  the  royj 
authority  was  exercised  owr  the  Church.  The  oath*which  the  clergymen 
were  to  take,  bound  them  to  be  the  servants  of  the  state  as  well  as  of  the 
Church.  As  Protestantism  gradually  developed  itself  the  contrast  between 
the  two  Churches  became  less  and  less  prominent  before  the  minds  of  the 
people,  and  other  antagonisms  of  far  greater  importance  than  those  between 
Luther  and  Zwingle  appeared  in  each.    Hence,  when  the  king  sent  forth  a 

ce)  Urkunden  z.  Bearth.  d.  kircbL  Yerii.  im  F.  LIppe.  Lpfl.  1S45.  Kv.  K.  Z.  1S48L  N.  lOd  1S4&  5- 
28.  87.  72. 1844  N.  12.  65.  1845.  N.  SOsa.  VL  1846.  N.  9s.  88.  5SL  Ha.  97. 1851.  N.  78aw 

n)  Eylert,  Oharactenuge  a.  d.  Leben  Fried.  Wllh.  IIL  Magdeb.  1S48-6l  esp.  &  toI.  [lih  aad 
Opinions  of  Fred.  Will.  III.  fh)ra  the  Germ,  of  Eylert,  by  J.  Birch,  Lond.  18*4.  a] 

h)  Acta  in  WachUr,  theoL  Nachrichten  1817.  SchMsrfnaeher,  (L  d.  einsorkht  SjraodalTtfil 
Brl.  1817.    A.  KZ.  1828.  N.  44. 


CHAP.  V.    EVANG.  CHURCH  TILL  1858.    |45a.  PBU88IA.    UNION.  567 

call  for  a  voluntary  union  at  the  Jubilee  of  the  Reformation,  (c)  the  union  of 
an  evangelical  Church  fell  into  his  hands  as  the  ripe  fruit  of  the  age.  No 
attempt  to  produce  uniformity  by  artificial  creeds  was  therefore  necessary. 
On  the  one  hand,  an  internal  union  was  effected  by  the  conviction  that  those 
controversies  which  had  now  ceased,  or  which  still  continued,  were  not 
inconsistent  with  Christian  love  and  fellowship ;  and  on  the  other,  all  that 
was  needful  to  an  external  union  was  accomplished  by  an  agreement  respect- 
ing a  constitution,  church  property,  and  ordinary  usages.  It  was  also  con- 
cluded that  the  Lord^s  Supper  should  be  celebrated  in  the  manner  proposed 
by  the  Synod  of  Berlin,  by  a  mere  breaking  of  the  bread  and  a  faithful  reci- 
tation of  the  wor^  used  in  the  original  institution.  But  while  this  work 
was  in  process  of  cheerful  accomplishment  in  the  several  ecclesiastical  corpo- 
rations^ sometimes  by  public  enactments  and  sometimes  as  the  government 
directed,  by  a  practical  acceptance  of  the  breaking  of  bread  and  an  ac- 
knowledgment of  the  authorities  of  the  united  Church,  it  was  considerably 
disturbed  by  the  introduction  of  the  Agenda.  The  development  which  had 
taken  place  in  the  principles  of  Protestantism,  and  the  modes  of  speech 
occasioned  by  the  new  scientific  and  literary  education  of  the  people,  ren- 
dered some  alteration  of  the  language  of  the  Church  indispensable.  New 
liturgies  were  therefore  introduced  into  some  established  churches  without 
attracting  much  attention.  A  common  form  of  worship  seemed  to  become 
necessary  by  the  union.  The  theological  commission  appointed  for  compos- 
ing such  an  instrument  in  Prussia  accomplished  nothing.  The  king  then  pub- 
lished an  Agenda  which  had  been  adopted  by  his  cabinet  (1822)  for  the  use 
of  the  court  church,  gave  orders  that  it  should  be  introduced  into  the  garri- 
son churches  of  his  kingdom,  and  recommended  it  to  all  the  congregations 
of  the  realm,  instead  of  the  conflicting  and  arbitrary  forms  which  had  pre- 
viously been  used  in  the  different  provinces,  (d)  Objections  against  it  were 
urged  by  some  who  fancied  that  it  partook  too  much  of  an  old  ecclesiastical, 
and  even  of  a  Catholic  spirit,  and  by  others  who  complained  that  it  was  not 
sufficiently  orthodox,  and  was  too  much  reformed.  Some,  also,  were  displeased 
with  a  heterogeneous  political  element  which  they  discovered  in  it.  But  no 
general  opposition  to  it  (^)  was  apparent  until  the  government  took  some 
steps  to  draw  over  the  churches  by  various  temptations  or  by  coercion,  and 
some  authors  contended  that  a  strict  conformity  to  tlie  liturgy  should  be  re- 
quired by  a  law  on  the  territorial  system.  (./")  In  the  midst  of  this  confusion 
no  synodal  constitution  was  carried  into  effect,  for  even  the  victorious  politi- 
cal party  took  no  pleasure  in  a  measure  which  so  forcibly  reminded  them  of 
the  promised  representative  system.  It  was  only  in  Westphalia  and  the 
Rhenish  provinces  that  a  synodal  form  on  the  basis  of  ancient  usages  was 
introduced  (1885),  but  even  there  the  system  left  as  much  to  be  desired  as  it 


c)  Sept  27,  1817,  In  NiUtch,  p.  125«. 

d)  Kirchen-Agenda  t  d.  prot  Uof-  a.  Domk.  in  Berl.  BrI.  and  oft   A.  KZ.  1S22.  N.  17.  6a 

e)  (Schleiermacher)  Ue.  d  lit  Keclit  ev.  Landcefureton,  r.  PaciC  Sincerus.  Gott  1S24.    Acten- 
•Uieke,  betr.  d.  Pr.  K.  A.  ed.  by  Falck,  Kiel,  1S27. 

/)  AuffwtL,  Kritik  d.  PreuM.  A.  Frkt  1928.  and  Erklar.  u.  d.  Majestiltareclit  in  kirclil.  DIngen.  F. 
1S2S.  m.  Neclitr.  Bonn.  1826.  MarhMneke,  0.  d.  wabre  Stelle  d.  lit  Recbta.  BrL  1S25.  C.  F.  «. 
Amman,  d.  Einfuh.  d.  BrL  A.  gescbicha  u.  kircbL  beleacbtet  Dnd.  1826. 


568  MODERN  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PEa  VL    A.  D.  1M8-I85a 

aotadlj  fulfilled,  (g)  The  appointment  of  general  superintendents  (1829), 
with  means  at  command  for  a  very  extensive  sphere  of  personal  influence, 
was  looked  npon  as  a  restoration  of  the  titular  hishops  to  their  former  pre- 
latical  position,  and  hence  as  the  commencement  of  a  Protestant  episco- 
pacy, {h)  The  king  showed  a  great  predilection  for  the  Agenda  as  a  work 
of  his  own,  and  he  even  wrote  a  very  modest  defence  of  it  with  his  own 
hand.  (/)  But  this  difficult  controversy  was  finally  settled  principally  by  an 
arrangement  proposed  by  the  Bishop  Nctinder^  according  to  which  a  new 
revision  of  the  liturgy  was  to  be  made  by  the  ecclesiastical  authorities,  with 
special  reference  to  the  most  important  objections  (1829).  As  this  presented 
to  the  worshippers  a  choice  of  several  forms,  and  paid  re^)ect  to  provincial 
usages,  and  as  the  rights  of  the  Church  were  preserved  and  were  duly  hon- 
ored by  the  government,  it  was  accepted  without  difficulty.  Accordingly, 
since  1880,  the  Agenda  has  possessed  the  authority  of  law,  and  but  one  evan- 
gelical national  Church  has  been  known  in  PruMia.  (k)  In  all  the  other  estab- 
lished churches  of  Germany  the  royal  appeal  was  favorably  received,  and  w^s 
carried  into  execution  by  means  of  enactments  in  the  synods  or  the  congrega- 
tions. In  Kassau  (1817),  this  was  accomplished  by  a  formal  recognition  of  a 
previous  unanimity  between  the  two  parties  in  the  essential  articles  of  their 
creeds.  (I)  In  Bar  arm  on  the  Rhine  ^  it  was  effected  (1818)  by  a  general  vote 
ou  an  edict  which  proposed  that  the  evangelical  Church  should  properly 
respect  the  symbolical  books  containing  the  ordinary  Protestant  concessions, 
but  should  have  no  authoritative  rule  of  faith  but  the  Holy  Scriptures.  In 
Baden^  the  same  result  was  secured  by  declaring  (1821)  that  the  Augsburg 
Confession,  together  with  the  Lutheran  and  Heidelberg  Catechisms,  should 
be  regarded  as  an  authoritative  rule  of  faith  only  as  far  as  a  f^ee  investigation 
should  discover  their  consistency  with  the  Scriptures,  the  only  sure  source  of 
Christian  trath,  and  as  far  as  the  pure  principles  of  evangelical  Protestantism 
were  found  in  them.  It  was  also  agreed  that  the  Lord^s  Supper  should  be 
celebrated  there  in  the  form  which  had  been  accepted  by  Melancthon  (p. 
407).  (7/2)  Wherever  the  union  was  not  then  effected,  it  was  on  account  of 
some  local  difficulties  in  the  respective  congregations.  In  those  national 
churches  within  the  bounds  of  which  very  little  more  than  a  single  Pro- 
testant Church  existed,  as  e,  g.,  the  Lutherans  in  the  states  of  the  Grerman 
Confederacy,  and  the  Reformed  in  Switzerland  and  the  Netherlands,  there 
was  no  necessity  or  object  of  such  a  Union,  but  even  there  it  was  accepted 
as  an  ideal,  and  was  recognized  wherever  an  individual  case  required  it. 
The  principal  remonstrance  against  it  was  from  a  few  Supematuralists  who 
possessed  no  doctrinal  agreement  among  themselves,  (n) 

ff)  Acta  hist  ecc.  1885.  p.  8758.  1836.  p.  450aa.  Yerhandll.  d.  S  rheln.  Prov.  Bjaodal-YeKammL 
Barmen,  ISSSw 

h)  Auffusti,  Beitrr.  z.  Oesch.  u.  Sutistik  d.  ex.  Kircbe,  pi  7S8s& 

i)  Luther  in  Boziebung  a.  d.  Preuss.  KAgende.  Bri.  1887. 

k)  A.  KZ.  1S29.  N.  140.  1880.  N.  9a  Et/Urt^  CL  Werth  n.  Wlrkong  d.  Agendo  naeb  d.  Besnltite 
e.  zehnjabr.  Erfahrung.  Potsd.  1880. 

t)  Archiv  f.  alto  u.  neue  KGescb.  vol  IV.  p.  18988.       m)  XiUsch,  p.  lS4a. 

n)  Tittmann^  Q.  Verelnigung.  Lpo.  ISia    Steudel^  ft.  Yereinigang.  T&b.  18S1. 


CHAP.  Y.    EYANG.  CHUBCH  TILL  1861    1 454  UNION.    LUTHEBANISM.      569 

§  454.     Lutheranwn  as  a  Sect  under  Frederic  William  III. 

The  spirit  of  orthodoxy  which  had  now  heen  once  more  awakened,  per- 
ceived that  it  would  soon  lose  its  principal  power,  il*  those  portions  of  the 
symbolical  books  in  which  the  different  charches  opposed  and  condemned 
each  other  were  no  longer  binding  upon  the  people.  So  strong,  indeed,  was 
the  feeling  now  aroused,  that  in  men  of  a  reckless  spirit  it  resembled  Luther's 
horror  at  all  fellowship  with  the  Reformed  Church.  That  which  in  other 
places  was  a  coDsoieutious  conviction  in  opposition  to  the  Uniou,  or  a  theo- 
logical opposition,  (a)  in  Prussia  necessarily  came  into  collision  with  the  lively 
interest  which  the  government  took  in  the  united  and  uniform  Church. 
When  the  Union  and  the  Agenda  were  accepted  at  Breslau  (1880),  Dr.  Schei- 
hel  remained  the  pastor  of  a  church  which  rejected  the  Union  as  a  work  of 
Indifferentism,  a  compact  between  Christ  and  Belial  and  the  Agenda,  as  a 
part  of  the  same  scheme.  After  many  efforts  at  accommodation,  he  was 
suspended  from  the  ministry,  and  when  he  insisted  upon  a  final  decision,  he 
was  dismissed  (1832).  (6)  Guericke  announced  that  he  had  returned  to  the 
old  Lutheran  Church,  from  Avhich  he  had  unconsciously  and  involuntarily 
been  removed,  and  he  now  obtained  a  secret  installation  for  himself  as  the 
pastor  of  a  congregation  in  and  near  Halle  (1834).  After  many  disturbances 
of  divine  worship  in  his  house  by  the  police,  he  was  deprived  of  his  profes- 
sorship on  account  of  a  rash  attack  which  he  made  upon  an  order  issued  by 
the  government  (1835).  (c)  A  few  pastors  connected  with  the  established 
Church  in  Silesia  produced  an  excitement  among  the  ignorant  people  of  their 
congregations,  by  preaching  that  Luther^s  precious  faith,  the  religion  of  their 
fathers,  had  been  superseded  by  the  theology  of  the  king.  To  hush  up  these 
disturbances,  an  order  was  obtained  (Feb.  28,  1884)  from  the  cabinet  by  the 
piedstic  party  then  forming  in  the  court,  (d)  which  assured  the  people  that 
the  Lutheran  Church,  with  its  various  confessions  of  faith,  was  not  abolished 
by  the  Agenda  and  the  Union,  and  that  nothing  but  that  Church  was  estab- 
lished by  law  ;  and  that  the  sacraments  were  to  be  administered  according  to 
the  usages  of  the  old  Lutheran  Church  to  all  who  desired  them  in  that  mode. 
The  Lutherans,  however,  could  not  comprehend  how  the  Lutheran  confession, 
condemning  the  doctrines  of  the  Reformed  Church,  could  really  be  received 
in  a  united  Church,  or  how  the  same  liturgy  could  be  received  in  two 
Churches  which  were  essentially  so  different.  These  pastors,  who  had  re- 
nounced the  Union  and  the  Agcndii,  and  would  no  longer  yield  obedience  to 
tlie  consistory  of  the  united  Church,  were  suspended.  When  Kellner^  the 
pastor  of  the  church  in  Honigem,  was  about  to  be  suspended  (Sept.  11th, 
1884),  the  congregation  while  singing  and  praying  presented  an  unwearied 
passive  resistance  to  the  opening  of  their  church,  being  resolved  to  do  noth- 

d)  OlMeUr^  nenester  UnlonsTen.  in  Bremen.  Bonn.  1SS4.  BudelbacK,  Grandvesto  d.  lath. 
Kirchenlebre  u.  Friedenspraxis.  Lpa.  1840. 

b)  Stffena^  wie  ich  wieder  Lntheraner  wnrde,  nnd  was  mir  Lntberthum  tot  BrsL  1S8L  (Ifusehke) 
TheoL  Votum  e.  Jarlsten  In  Bacbsen  d.  preuaa.  Hof-Ag.  ed.  by  Scbeibel,  Nrnb.  1882.  Scheibtl^  aoten* 
mai«ige  QftcYu  d.  net  Untcmebmang  e.  Union  bea.  im  preusa.  Staate.  Lpa.  1884.  2  vela. 

c)  Einige  Urknnden  betr.  d.  Oeach.  d.  latb.  Ocmeinde  in  n.  nm  Halle,  Liis.  ISSSi 

d)  Comp.  £▼.  KZ.  185&  N.  fi. 


CHAP.  y.    EVANO.  CHURCH  TILL  1898L    $  454.  FREDEBIC  WILLIAM  IIL      57 1 

of  oondemnatioD,  and  ceased  to  imprison  according  to  law  those  private  mem- 
bers who  had  refused  to  testify  against  their  ministers  with  reference  to  offi- 
cial acts  prohibited  by  the  authorities.  (A)  Frederic  WillUim  HI.  always 
acknowledged  the  rights  of  conscience  in  matters  of  religion,  but  with  a 
mind  remarkably  fond  of  order,  he  loved  to  bring  every  thing  to  uniformity. 
In  spiritual  things  he  generally  thought  it  safest  to  refer  to  father  Luther,  but 
he  esteemed  a  man  a  rebel  who  adhered  to  Luther's  sentiments  with  Luther's 
obstinacy.  He  felt  himself,  and  he  proved  himself  to  be  the  protector  of  the 
evangelical  Church  far  beyond  the  limits  of  Prussia,  and  he  even  bestowed 
many  favors  upon  the  Catholic  Cliurch  of  his  kingdom.  And  yet,  in  the 
evening  of  his  life,  he  found  himself  involved  in  acts  of  arbitrary  violence 
against  each  of  these  Churches.  His  time  on  earth  was  spent  in  disquietude, 
^nt  his  trust  was  in  God. 

§  455.     Legal  Vietcs  and  Legal  RehitioTU  in  German  Countries, 
L.  RichUr,  (p.  441.)    AT.  Ifa»e,  cL  ev.  prot  K,  d.  deutschen  Bdchs.  Lps.  (1^43.)  1862. 

In  a  time  of  ecclesiastical  exhaustion  there  was  no  disposition  or  ability 
to  construct  a  peculiar  system  of  laws  for  the  Church.  Schuderoff  (176^-1843) 
almost  alone  then  contended  for  a  collegiate  system,  but  his  zeal  against 
Jurists  in  the  Church  had  rather  a  hierarchical  tendency,  (a)  As  soon  as  the 
ecclesiastical  life  exhibited  its  former  vigor,  general  complaints  were  heard 
that  the  Church  was  subject  to  an  arbitrary  foreign  influence,  and  that  its 
members  excused  themselves  from  all  interest  in  its  affairs  on  account  of  the 
bureaucratic  interference  of  the  civil  authorities,  and  their  exclusion  from  all 
share  in  its  administration.  Hence,  when  the  union  with  the  Reformed 
Church  took  place,  attention  was  turned  to  the  fragments  of  the  old  ecclesi- 
astical establishment,  preserved  in  the  latter  in  the  form  of  ecclesiastical 
elders  and  synods,  and  to  the  union  by  means  of  consistories  under  the  sov- 
ereign of  the  country,  (h)  In  the  literary  controversies  between  the  advo- 
cates of  the  different  legal  views,  those  who  believed  that  the  Church  was 
purchased  by  the  blood  of  the  God- man  maintained  that  its  territory  was 
manifestly  beyond  the  reach  of  the  secular  powers.  But  a  disinclination  for 
all  theories  of  natural  liberty,  and  a  dread  of  popular  suffrage  as  the  domin- 
ion of  the  flesh,  then  prevailed,  and  gave  great  advantage  to  those  who  advo- 
cated the  predominance  of  the  princely,  or  at  least  of  the  spiritual  powers,  (c) 


K)  Schfihel:  MittbeilDngen  d.  list.  Oesch.  d.  lath.  K.  Alton.  ISSSss.  6  H.  Archlv  f.  hist  Entw.  n. 
ntt  Gefich.  d.  luth.  K.  Numb.  1S41.  2  P.  u.  A.  K.  Z.  1S88.  N.  191&  0.  F.  Wahrhariy  meine  Snspen- 
dirang,  Klnkerkerung.  u.  Ausvrander.  Lps.  1Sd9.  J.  D.  Loewenhurg^  PenecnUon  of  the  Luth. 
Church  in  Prussia  (roin  1331.  Lend.  1S40.  Bcrl.  K.  Z.  1889.  N.89.  46.  ST.  Stffens^  vras  ich  eriebte. 
Tol.  X.  p.  71.  72458. 

a)  Ansichten  u.  Wunsche  betr.  d.  prot  KWej»nn  u.  d.  Qeistlichk.  Lps.  1814. 

b)  J.  Sihuiffrofl  Grundz.  z  ev.  prnt.  KVert  Lps,  181T.  E.  Zimmennann,  Grundz.  z.  ev.  KVerl 
In  sr.  Monatsch.  vol.  L  II.  Is.  I*aU,  d.  ofTenU.  Becht  d.  ev.  lath.  K.  Id  Teutschl  Tub.  1S27.  On  the 
other  side:  F.  v.  Bulotr,  u.  d.  gegenw.  Vcrh.  d.  ev.  KWes.  in  Deatschl.  Mgdb.  (1818.)  1819.  Bret- 
9Chneider^  Votutn  u.  d.  repraea.  Verf.  d.  K.  Lps.  1832. 

c)  £v.  KZ.  1832.  N.  2.  RudelbacJi^  14  Thesen  u.  Presb.  u.  Syn.  Lps.  1882.  Pttchia,  EinL  in  d. 
Becht  d.  K.  Lps.  ISiO.  F.  J.  Stahl,  d.  KVerfl  nach  Lehre  u.  Becht  d.  Prut  £r!nng.  1840.  C  Jlotfif, 
d.  wahren  Grundl.  d.  ev.  KYcr£  BrI.  1844. 


572  MODERN  CnUBCH  HISTORY.    PER.'  YL    A.  D.  164S-186& 

The  Hegelian  school  once  more  hrought  forward  the  territorial  system  in 
connection  with  their  higher  view  of  the  state,  according  to  which  the 
Church,  as  a  distinct  society,  entirely  disappears,  and  hecomes  merely  the 
religions  element  of  the  state,  (d)  But  the  more  the  importance  of  the  state 
in  a  popular  and  patriotic  point  of  view  was  recognized,  the  more  the  right 
of  the  Christian  congregations  to  develope  hy  their  own  energies  the  constitu* 
tion  best  suited  to  their  progress  in  cultivation,  was  also  acknowledged.  The 
relation  of  these  congregations  to  the  state  was  to  be  that  of  mutual  assist- 
ance, but  in  the  existing  organization  of  the  German  state  confederacies,  they 
were  to  be  dependent  only  upon  the  widest  national  limits,  (i)  Baden  re- 
ceived with  the  union  a  synodal  system,  but  the  general  synod  was  to  be  con- 
vened only  at  the  suggestion  of  the  sovereign^  and  then  simply  as  an  advisory 
council.  (/)  In  1845,  Zittel,  a  pastor  of  a  congregation,  proposed  to  the  Diet,* 
that  instead  of  the  past  religious  intolerance,  under  which  Christianity  had 
found  no  peace,  they  should  try  the  effect  of  religions  liberty,  under  which 
every  form  of  worship  should  be  tolerated,  and  no  civil  penalties  should  be 
exacted  unless  a  failure  in  the  performance  of  civil  duties  appeared  probable. 
A  complete  storm  of  petitions  principally  from  the  Catholic  sections  of  the 
country,  against  the  majority  in  the  chamber  which  was  ready  to  concur 
with  the  proposition,  was  the  result.  The  Union  Church  was  here  ao  strictly 
constituted,  that  when  the  pastor  EichJiorn  felt  constrained  in  conscience, 
from  his  attachment  to  exclusive  Lutlieranism,  to  give  notice  (1850)  of  his 
secession  from  the  united  Church,  and  had  received  the  permission  which  he 
had  asked,  he  was  punished  by  imprisonment,  or  was  directed  by  the  police 
to  leave  the  country,  because  in  some  instances  he  afterwards  performed  min- 
isterial duties  for  those  who  like  him  had  forsaken  the  Church.  These  per- 
sons, according  to  their  own  confession,  knew  but  little  of  their  former  or 
their  present  creed,  and  had  in  general  been  involved  in  the  revolutions  of 
that  period,  but  they  have  hitherto  received  no  permission  to  form  any  Lu- 
theran congregation,  (g)  The  evangelical  Church  in  Bataria^  by  an  appen- 
dix to  the  national  constitution  (1818),  was  allowed  the  privilege  of  managing 
its  own  internal  affairs,  under  the  supervision  of  the  supreme  authorities  of 
the  state.  In  the  Rhenish  Palatinate,  as  soon  as  the  Union  was  formed, 
parochial  councils  with  power  to  fill  their  own  vacancies,  district  synods  and 
a  general  synod,  chosen  partly  by  and  from  the  congregations  themselves, 
were  organized,  and  it  was  for  this  reason  that  the  rationalistic  party  in  that 
country  was  able  to  maintain  its  ground  in  the  long  conflict  with  the  superior 
consistory  at  Munich,  which  was  essentially  Lutheran,  though  occasionally 
under  Catholic  influence.  The  order  for  the  election  of  elders  in  the  congre- 
gations on  the  eastern  side  of  the  Rhine  (1821),  was  so  indefinite  with  respect 
, ■ 

d)  Hoth^^  d.  Anfange  d.  K.  a.  Ibrer  Veit  Witt  1887.  1  vol  Die  ex.  Landesk.  Prenssens  n.  d. 
Wisa.  Lpji.  1840. 

e)  a  UUmann,  t  d.  Zuk.  d.  ev.  K.  DeutochL  Stuttg.  1845.  JuL  MOUer^  dlo  nichsten  An^aben 
t  d.  Fortbild.  d.  deutM:h-prot  KVert.  Brsl.  1S45.  C.  C.  J.  Bunsen,  d.  VerC  d.  K.  d.  Zakunft  Uambi 
1840.  [Const  of  Uie  Church  of  the  Faturi^  «kc.  ttom  the  Oenn.  Lend.  1848.  8.]  JT.  Hate,  d.  gate 
alte  Rccht  d.  K.  Lpe.  2  ed.  1847. 

/)  A.  KZ.  1S82.  N.  SOI.  1S85.  N.  9a  1848.  N.  101. 117fl.  170flL    Acta  hUt  ecc  188S.  p.  414aaL 
0)  ActenmaM.  Dant  betr.  Past  Elchh.  (Allg.  KBIatt  1853.  N.  16&)— C  Eickkom^  geach.  AhriM 
d.  Entsteh.  ev.  lath.  Gemeinden  Im  O.  Baden.  Stattg.  186& 


CHAP.  y.    ETAN6.  CHUBCH  TILL  1858L    $46S;  BAYABIA.    WURTEMBERO.    573 

to  the  peculiar  duties  of  tbese  officers,  that  many  feared  a  hierarchical 
discipline  was  intended,  and  hence  such  a  unanimous  expression  of  public 
opinion  was  raised  against  it,  that  the  government  withdrew  the  plan,  (h) 
The  subsequent  establishment  of  the  synodal  constitution  (after  1825)  took 
place  under  many  suspicious  limitations :  each  of  the  two  dioceses  were  to 
have  a  separate  general  synod ;  the  representatives  of  the  congregations  were 
to  be  chosen  by  the  pastors ;  one  half  of  all  elected  for  the  general  synod  by 
the  district  assemblies  were  to  be  set  aside  by  the  superior  consistory ;  all 
acts  were  to  be  merely  advisory,  and  even  from  such  deliberations  the  hyper- 
catholic  ministry  of  Abel  had  power  to  exclude  at  pleasure  precisely  those 
things  which  were  of  any  interest  to  the  Church.  (0  In  Wurtemberg^  the 
Church  was  represented  in  the  diet  by  prelates  nominated  by  the  king,  and 
through  these  its  principal  eflfort  was  to  recover  the  ecclesiastical  property, 
of  which  the  recollection  of  the  people  was  still  fresh.  After  1880,  when 
most  of  the  middle  German  states  received  representative  constitutions,  it 
became  necessary  to  make  many  changes  in  the  administration  of  ecclesiasti- 
cal affairs,  and  the  Church  demanded  securities  for  its  established  rights,  (k) 
But  the  theory  of  the  serai-liberal  constitution  of  that  country  was  not  favor- 
able to  a  peculiar  department  of  laws  for  the  Church,  and  when  the  clergy 
set  up  new  claims,  they  lost  their  old  privileges,  until  the  power  and  the  em- 
barrassments of  the  religious  interests  (since  1840)  have  combined  with  the 
kindred  improvements  in  political  and  ecclesiastical  jurisprudence  to  strength- 
en their  demands  and  call  forth  partial  promises,  for  the  oppressions  of  the 
people  in  civil  life  have  compelled  them  to  seek  freedom  in  ecclesiastical  agi- 
tations. (0  The  National  Assemlly  in  St.  Paul's  church  (1848)  had  no  idea 
of  jeopardizing  the  unity  of  the  nation  of  which  it  was  then  dreaming,  by 
engaging  in  the  old  ecclesiastical  disputes ;  but  in  forming  a  theory  of  the 
original  rights  of  the  German  people,  it  was  driven  by  a  recollection  of  many 
civil  and  ecclesiastical  aggressions  upon  mental  freedom  to  put  forth  a  declara- 
tion respecting  the  true  relation  of  the  state  to  religion.  During  the  delib- 
erations upon  this  subject,  it  appeared  that  some  were  opposed  to  every  kind 
of  church,  but  the  co-operation  of  these  extreme  parties  in  favor  of  the  com- 
plete independence  of  Church  and  state,  was  held  in  check  by  the  hesitation 
of  a  middle  party,  which  feared  to  open  the  door  for  an  unlimited  ecclesias- 


A)  A.  KZ.  1S22.  N.  84.  8t.  34.  43.  Works  bj  Lehmns,  KalMer,  Fuchs.  On  tho  other  side :  Togal, 
Oertel,  and  others. — Paultu,  wi'.l  d.  Balencho  Landesk.  nicht  mundig  werden  ?  (Sophronlzoiif  1824. 
VOL  VI.  U.  1.) 

f)  SUphani,  kan.  Kecht.  Tub.  ISW.  p.  6l8a.  F.  J.  Kiethammery  Nacbr.  v.  d.  er»ten  YersaroniL 
d.  Oen.  SjrnodeD  in  B.  Salzb.  1S25.  Fucha,  Zust  d.  prot  K.  In  R  Ansb.  1830.  (Printed)  Mann- 
script:  Die  Gen.  8yn.  za  Ansbach  im  J.  1844.  Without  place,  f.  Another  revision  of  this  document 
printed  at  Ulm. 

k)  BickM  XL  Ilupfeld,  iL  d.  Bef.  d.  KVerf  in  bos.  BQcks.  a.  Kurhcssen.  Harb.  1S81.  WQnscbe 
d.  ev.  Oeistlichk.  Sachs.  L.  1S81.  GroMmann^  {L  Bet  d.  KVerC  in  Sachs.  L.  1888.  For  lit  see  Stud. 
0.  Krit.  188&  H.  28. 

/)  G.  V.  Weher,  die  Umgeetaltung  d.  KVerC  in  Sachs.  L.  1838.  Brdunig^  constitntlonelles  Leben 
In  d.  K.  Lp&  1888.  C.  Wolff,  dif<  Zukunft  d.  prot  K.  Stuttg.  1840.  C.  R  Kdniff,  d.  nst  Zi'lt  In  d. 
ev.  K.  d.  Preoaa.  Staats.  Braunschw.  1843.  B.  3foUy  d.  gegcnw.  Noth.  d.  ev.  K.  Pron.^  Pasewalk, 
184&— AcU  bbt  eoc.  188&  p.  419s8.  BrL  KZ.  184S.  N.  SSss.  eSi.—iOundMhagen)  Der  deutsche  Pro- 
test, a.  Tergangenh.  n.  bentigt^n  Lebensfh^n.  FrkC  1S47.  J.  Wiffgerg,  die  kirchL  Bevrcg.  in 
DeutMshl  Beet.  1848. 


574  MODERN  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  TL    ▲.  D.  164S-1898L 

tical  iDterference  from  abroad.  Accordingly,  all  were  allowed  foil  liberty  to 
believe  in  any  form  of  religion,  or  in  none,  without  affecting  their  civil  or 
mnnicipal  riirhts :  no  special  political  privileges  were  allowed  to  any  reHgiov 
societies :  permission  was  given  to  form  new  religions  societies,  and  all  w«t 
independently  to  manage  their  own  affairs,  subject  only  to  the  general  liwi 
of  the  state.  A  general  form  of  an  oath  suited  to  any  religions  opinions  wai 
also  pnnide*!.  and  the  validity  of  marriage  was  made  to  depend  entirely  apot 
a  civil  act.  With  respect  to  the  schools  there  was  much  contention  between 
the  diiferent  parties,  for  the  Protestant  teachers  especially  demanded  a  cooa- 
plete  emancipation  from  the  bonds  of  the  Church,  while  the  Catholic  ptrtr 
with  it5  [iienstic  adjunct  endeavore<l  to  attain  an  opposite  result  by  a  free 
election  «f  the  teachers  by  the  congregation.  The  majority,  however,  whik 
it  held  to  the  principle  that  all  science  and  instruction  in  it  should  be  free, 
plaoe^l  the  whole  j«chool  system  under  the  supervision  of  the  state,  and  rt- 
ii:oved  :Ve  schtx>ls  from  the  inspection  of  the  clergy  as  such,  without  forWd- 
diui:  the  employment  of  skilful  clergymen  in  the  supervision  of  theoL(iii) 
In  the  composition  of  the  Prussian  fundamental  laws  at  Erfurth,  these  prin- 
civlvs  wore  essentially  retained,  with  the  exception  only  of  the  article  re- 
sj^viiiiiT  sj»ocial  p«»litical  privileges,  which  the  state  wished  to  have  power  to 
jn^nt  to  religious  societies  whose  general  aims  might  specially  correspcffid 
wi::i  its  ov.  n.  Tlie  establishment  of  a  state  Church,  however,  was  espeeiaDy 
g;iardixl  aL-ninst,  and  all  charitable  institutions  were  secured  from  anj 
iiifringt-me:u.  These  principles  were  indeed  incorporated  in  the  oonstitn- 
tional  chartvr  of  almost  every  German  state,  but  the  revived  diet  (rf  the 
oi>nfo<'.or:iiion  declared  (Aug.,  1851)  that  these  pretended  fondamental  law? 
novi-r  |H»SM>N'.e<l  any  legjil  authority.  Very  little  was  done  even  when  the 
power  txi^toil  to  onfi»ri»e  them,  for  the  masseSs  of  society  were  interested  oatj 
in  j^»liiio;;l  questions,  and  the  clergy  were  jealous  of  mtgorities  supposed  to 
Iv  unfriiiblly  to  the  Church.  In  almost  every  place  committees  were  np- 
|H>intod  hv  moans  of  the  previous  ecclesiastical  authorities,  by  whom  ont- 
lint*^  ol'  oonsiitutions  were  prepared,  which  conveyed  the  executive  power<rf 
the  Chunh  into  the  hands  of  a  series  of  representative  synods,  rising  through 
several  gradations  from  the  ccaigregation,  with  an  unequal  number  of  secular 
and  clerical  doputios,  and  subject,  as  before  agreed  upon,  to  the  control  of  the 
ovangvlionl  sovereign  through  certain  officers.  All  contemplated  at  some 
ftuure  porioil  a  great  evangelicd  Church  of  the  German  empire.  These  plans 
wore  of  ct»nrs«»  laid  aside  when  the  political  party  of  the  reaction  became 
ovory  where  triumphant.  A  few  national  churches  like  those  of  Wurtem- 
borg  and  Weimar  have  nevertheless  been  allowed  to  have  councils  chosen 
l^artly  by  the  congregations  for  the  administration  of  their  ecclesiastical 
atVairs  0^*^!^^  which  have  since  been  actually  elected,  and  been  engaged  in  a 
limited  sphere  of  Christian  activity.  In  Bavaria^  the  two  divisions  of  the 
i^hmoh  on  the  eastern  side  of  the  Rhine,  by  the  free  choice  of  the  congrega- 
tions at  a  pri>visionnl  election,  united  under  one  General  Synod  at  Anspach 
^ISI'.h,  and  obtained  from  the  government  (1850-^8)  an  electoral  law,  ac- 
«>mling  to  which  those  who  possessed  the  confidence  of  the  congregations 

m)  Fond.  Law  of  Dml  21, 184a  Artt  5  uidl 


CHAP.  V.    £VANO.  OnURCH  TILL  1858.    $  455.    OERM.  CHARTER    OLDENB.    575 

oonld  be  appointed  to  manage  their  ecclesiadtical  affairs,  and  a  donble  number 
of  clergymen  could  be  elected  to  the  general  synod.  («)  The  General  Synod 
of  the  Rhenish  Electorate  assembled  in  October,  1848,  and  received  from  the 
goYemment  a  release  from  the  control  of  the  superior  consistory,  and  the 
grant  of  an  electoral  law.  (o)  A  committee  appointed  by  this  synod,  in  a  ra- 
tionalistic spirit  and  without  much  consideration,  changed  the  original  record 
of  the  Union  of  1818,  which,  after  the  overthrow  of  the  revolution,  called 
forth  the  opposition  of  the  minority,  and  received  the  censure  of  the  Pro- 
testant faculties  of  Germany  when  their  opinions  were  asked  respecting  it.  (p) 
The  General  Synod  of  1868,  in  terror  of  the  sword  of  dissolution,  in  face  of 
many  dishonorable  elections  of  elders,  and  in  consequence  of  the  appointment 
of  a  number  of  clergymen  from  the  division  on  the  other  side  of  the  Rhine, 
returned  to  the  patriarchal  electoral  laws  of  1818,  went,  in  fact,  beyond 
them,  and  decided  with  respect  to  the  creed,  that  the  consensus  which  exists 
in  the  principal  confessions  of  the  evangelical  German  Church,  of  which  the 
Church  of  the  Palatinate  is  a  part,  is  best  to  be  found  in  the  Augsburg  Con- 
fession of  1540.  A  reservation,  however,  was  distinctly  put  forth,  that  no 
compulsory  obligation  of  an  ecclesiastical  or  political  nature  was  thus  asserted 
in  behalf  of  the  symbolic  books,  (q)  In  Oldenburg  alone  the  favorable  mo- 
ment was  improved,  and  an  ecclesiastical  government  was  actually  set  up 
(1849)  by  a  synod  chosen  by  the  congregations.  Here  the  ecclesiastical  au- 
thority of  the  sovereign  was  set  aside,  and  the  affairs  of  each  congregation 
were  committed  to  an  assembly  of  its  adult  men,  and  a  council  chosen  by 
.them  ;  tlie  common  business  of  the  congregations  was  intrusted  to  an  annual 
general  synod,  chosen  directly  by  the  people,  and  one  half  composed  of  cler- 
gymen ;  and  the  administration  was  placed  in  the  hands  of  an  ecclesiastical 
council  chosen  by  and  responsible  to  the  synod.  Though  this  constitution 
had  no  connection  with  the  civil  power,  it  was  proclaimed  by  the  Grand 
Duke ;  and  as  men  of  an  ecclesiastical  spirit  were  chosen,  it  was  not  unwor- 
thily carried  into  execution,  and  was  capable  of  throwing  off  any  defects 
which  might  be  found  in  it.  (r)  But  by  its  separation  from  the  state,  the  se-^ 
curity  of  ecclesiastical  property  was  gone,  it  was  soon  left  without  support  in 
consequence  of  the  hostility  of  the  civil  oflBcers,  tlie  suspicions  of  the  orthodox 
party  for  the  indefiniteness  of  its  creed,  (*)  and  the  dislike  of  the  clergy  on 
'  account  of  their  dependence  upon  the  congregations,  and  in  a  time  of  general 
political  reaction,  few  would  defend  it  against  the  reproach  of  its  revolution- 
ary origin.  A  change  in  accordance  with  the  terms  of  the  fundamental  law 
of  1862  was  effected  (April,  1853)  by  the  Grand  Duke,  after  an  audience  with 
the  general  synod  and  the  supreme  ecclesiastical  council,  on  the  ground  that 
the  Evangelical  Lutheran  Church  of  Oldenburg  should  independently  admin- 


n)  Brl.  KZ.  1649.  N.  1A.  80.  S4.  89.  48.  1850.  N.  84.  A.  K.  Z.  1S58.  N.  149. 

o)  Bri.  KZ.  194a  N.  6«.  91.  104.  1849.  N.  6.  27.  48. 

p)  Gatachten  deutsclier  ev.  th.  Facalttltcn  Q.  den  der  K.  d.  bay.  Pfalz  zugcdacbten  Yerfimungs* 
entw.  Frkt  1851. 

q)  A.  KZ.  1858.  N.  178. 

r)  Verbandll  d.  Syn.  0.  d.  Vcrf.  d.  Oldenb.  ov.  K.  Oldenb.  1849.  4.  Yorbandll.  d.  1.  Landerayn. 
ISIM).  4.— <].  9,  Landc8»yiL  1851.  4.    Qesetz-  a.  YerordDangsbl.  d.  er.  KIrcbe.  toL  L  St.  1. 

t)  Der  Notbatand  d.  ev.  K.  Oldenb.  1852.  £▼.  KZ.  1861.  N.  908. 


576  MODESN  CUUBCH  HISTORY.    PES.  YL    A.  D.  lMS-18Sa 

bter  its  affairs  in  scriptural  correspondence  with  the  confessions  of  the  Re- 
formation, that  it  ought  not  to  infringe  upon  the  laws  of  the  state,  and  that 
the  Grand  Duke,  who  adhered  to  the  evangelical  confession,  should  have  the 
same  control  of  ecclesiastical  affairs  which  was  usually  conceded  to  the  evan- 
gelical princes  of  Germany.  This  control  was,  however,  to  be  limited  by  the 
constitution,  which,  in  addition  to  a  supreme  ecclesiastical  council  appointed 
by  the  Grand  Duke,  establishes  a  triple  synodal  system  regularly  ascending 
from  the  congregations.  No  ecclesiastical  law  can  be  enacted  without  the 
consent  of  the  national  synod,  which  is  to  be  composed  of  twelve  clergymen, 
seventeen  laymen  chosen  by  the  district  synods,  and  five  persons  nomina* 
ted  by  the  Grand  Duke,  but  elected  by  the  supreme  ecclesiastical  council.  (0 

§  466.     The  Prussian  National  Church  and  its  Branches  since  1840. 

When  Frederic  William  IV.  ascended  the  throne  which  a  century  before 
had  been  occupied  by  Frederic  the  Great,  the  pietistio  orthodox  party  ex- 
pected to  have  complete  control.  Although  he  had  been  educated  in  a  school 
too  intellectual  and  modem  to  sympathize  with  every  kind  of  literal  orthodoxy, 
he  found  spiritual  benefit  at  the  baptismal  font  of  the  Prince  of  Wales,  and  at 
the  laying  of  the  foundation-stone  of  the  portal  of  the  cathedral  of  Cologne.  But 
the  zeal  of  that  party  for  orthodoxy  he  regarded  as  only  an  excess  of  commend- 
able fidelity,  while  he  looked  upon  their  opponents  as  perjurers.  He  fully 
understood  the  feelings  of  St.  Louis  when  he  co-operated  with  the  Arch- 
bishop of  Canterbury  in  the  establishment  of  the  bishopric  of  St.  James  in 
Jerusalem  (1 841),  but  so  unanimously  was  public  opinion  against  what  was 
supposed  to  be  a  new  attempt  to  transfer  the  English  ecclesiastical  system  to 
Prussia  (§  414),  that  this  pious  foundation  was  obliged  to  be  brought  back  to 
its  essential  object,  which  was,  to  be  a  spiritual  union  in  spite  of  ecclesiasti- 
cal differences,  and  to  be  a  mustard-eeed  of  Protestantism  on  Mount  Zion, 
which  has  since  sent  forth  its  first  shoots  under  Bishop  Grobat  (since  1846), 
though  not  without  some  danger  of  Anglicising  and  languishing,  (a)  When 
*the  king  bestowed  his  special  favors  upon  the  priests  of  a  mediaeval  Church, 
men  began  to  think  there  was  some  truth  in  a  prophecy  invented  near  the 
close  of  the  seventeenth  century,  but  ascribed  to  an  aged  monk  of  Lehnin 
(about  1300),  that  after  the  many  wrongs  inflicted  upon  the  old  Church  by 
the  rulers  of  the  house  of  Ilohenzollem,  the  last  should  be  the  king  of  all' 
Germany,  and  should  then  re-establish  the  convents  and  restore  tho  Church 
to  its  former  unity,  (l)    Indeed,  the  royal  assurance  was  not  needed  to  con- 


f)  Yerbandll.  d.  8.  Landessyn.  Oldenb.  1853.  4.  Gesetz-  n.  YerordnnngsbL  d.  ev.  lath.  K.  toL  IL 
St  l.—  Th.  V.  Weddtrkop,  die  Vert  d.  ev.  lath.  K.  Oldenb.  1858. 

o)  {Schneckeriburger  and  IIunde»hagen)  Das  anglo-preoss.  Blsth.  za  S.  Jacob  n.  was  dam 
hiingt  Freib.  1S42.  {Schneckenh.)  Die  orient  Frage  d.  deatschen  ev.  K.  Berne,  184a  Ihid.  dl«  aT. 
KZ.  Im.  Kampfe  f.  d.  Blsth.  In  Jcnis.  Berne,  \^iL—{Ahek€n)  Das  ev.  Bistb.  za  Jenic  gMohlehtL 
Darst  m.  d.  Urk.  Brl.  1842.  Briefwech9el  (zw.  Gladstone  a.  Bnnsen)  CL  d.  deotsche  K.,  das  Efrfsco* 
pat  u.  Jeras.  Ilarob.  1844.—/*.  C.  Bwald,  Joarnal  of  M158.  Labors  In  the  Citj  of  Jeraa.  Load.  ISll— 
Brl.  KZ.  1848.  N.  6. 184«.  N.  62.  63«8. 1847.  N.  7.  1852.  N.  4  1858.  N.  8.  IS. 

b)  L.  de  Bouveroty  Extralt  d'nn  mnnascrit  rclatif  k  la  prophetic  da  trin  Ilermann  de  Lah&ia 
Brux.  1846.  Jleinhold,  in  d.  N.  Prcoaa.  Ztg.  1849.  Append,  to  N.  64.— GUmUt,  d.  Lehntsechc 
Weiss.  Erf  1849.    Comp.  M.  W.  n^ffUr,  Gescb.  d.  KL  Lehnin.  Brandenb.  1801. 


CHAP.  V.    EVANO.  CIICBCU  TILL  1853.    f  45d  TKUSS.  NAT.  CJHURCIL        577 

vince  the  people  that  ho  was  firmly  established  in  the  faith  of  his  fathers,  (c) 
From  his  regard  not  only  to  justice,  but  to  what  was  ancient  and  peculiar,  he 
had  the  last  of  the  old  Lutheran  imprisoned  clergymen  set  at  liberty,  (d)  At 
a  general  synod  held  at  Breslau  (1841),  these  Separatists  formed  a  Lutheran 
Church  of  Prussia,  under  a  well-constructed  constitution,  but  rigidly  exclu- 
sive with  respect  to  the  established  Church  and  the  civil  government,  (e)  and 
they  were  recognized  by  the  state  as  congregations  of  Lutherans  sepiirated 
from  the  national  Church.  (/)  Since  the  cessation  of  persecution  they  have 
increased  with  less  rapidity.  They  now  consist  of  about  thirty  ministerial 
charges,  and  we  hear  not  only  of  appeals  for  aid  for  the  "  Lutheran  Church 
involved  in  debt,"  but  confessions  that  the  love  of  many  has  waxed  cold,  and 
that  the  word  of  God  is  no  longer  heard  with  zeal,  (y)  In  consequence  of 
internal  dissensions,  sometimes  amounting  to  mutual  excommunications,  their 
ecxilesiastical  ideals  have  been  carried  to  the  new  world,  and  there  continued 
with  brighter  prospects.  (//)  But  even  within  the  established  Church,  a  de- 
cided Lutheran  teudencj',  like  that  which  has  risen  in  other  German  coun- 
tries, has  made  its  appearance,  under  the  direction  sometimes  of  great  learn- 
ing and  judgment,  subjecting  all  theological  principles  to  its  standard,  (/)  and 
sometimes  of  a  shallow  fanaticism.  (I)  At  an  early  period  of  his  reign,  the 
king  had  expressed  his  detennination  to  allow  the  Church,  over  which  the 
crown  had  acquired  supreme  power  during  the  Reformation,  freely  to  form 
for  itself  its  own  external  organization.  The  transfer  of  a  part  of  the  eccle- 
siastical administration  from  the  provincial  governments  to  the  consistories 
(1845),  (0  might  be  construed  as  an  expedient  to  get  an  easier  control  of  the 
Church  by  the  appointment  of  persons  of  a  particular  party.  But  when  the 
provincial  synods  had  a&-:embled  in  1844,  composed  of  the  superintendents  in 
each  of  the  six  eastern  provinces,  and  a  clergyman  chosen  from  each  dio- 
cese, (///)  the  king  cnlled  a  General  Synod  at  Berlin,  not  of  representatives, 
but  of  distinguished  persons  in  the  Church,  thirty-seven  of  whom  were  cler- 
gymen, an<l  thirty-eight  were  laymen.  Under  the  presidency  of  the  minister 
for  public  worship,  during  a  session  continued  from  June  2,  to  Aug.  29,  1846, 
this  body,  which  made  no  pretensions  to  a  legal  authority,  but  had  no  re- 
straint on  the  expression  of  its  opinions,  and  acted  on  conclusions  drawn  from 
the  proceedings  of  the  provincial  synods,  presented  its  views  of  the  existing 
w^nts  of  the  Church.  (//)  Its  pLm  for  a  future  ecclesiastical  constitution 
combined  the  consistorial  administration  proceeding  directly  from  the  crown, 

c)  D.  A.  Z.  1851.  N.  4at.   BrI.  KZ.  1S51.  N.  74.        d)  K.  "RT^  1340.  N.  168. 

«)  lk>.^blu58e  d.  V.  d.  ov.  lutli.  K.  In  Pr.  gchaltenen  OeneraUyn.  Lpa.  1S42. 

/)  BrI.  KZ.  1845.  N.  S4. 

g)  Dcr  gfgonw.  Stand,  d.  ov.  luth.  K.  in  Pr.  Tom  ObcrkirchoDColIegiam.  Lps.  1S47.  Latb. 
KBlatt  1SV2.  N.  77.  Brl.  KZ.  1S52.  N.  93. 

A)  Kv.  KZ.  1S4:5.  N.  «3.  A.  K21  1858.  N.  15. 

i)  Ztlt.Th.  f.  d.  posarnmte  Intli.  Tli.  u.  K.  v.  Rudelhach  u.  Guerick^  since  1840. 

k)  K.  M.  Ift't/n,  dit'  in  d.  S4.Mno  Notz  d.  Union  geratbcne  ev.  lulh.  K.  in  bcs.  Bez.  a.  Hamburg. 
Ibid.  1S44.        /)  Brl.  KZ.  1S45.  N.  66. 

wi)  Protocol U'  d.  im  J.  1844  in  d.  oof-XV  Prov.  d.  Pr.  Monarchid  abgeh.  Prov.  Synoden.  2  II.  i. 
Bruna,  \ie\>.  1S4»).  vol.  VL  p.  25:3«».  vol.  VIl.  p.  473*. 

n)  G.  Kruger,  Borichtc  G.  d.  ti>te  ev.  Gen.  Syn.  Prcuas.  Lps.  1S46.  Yerbandlangon  d.  ev.  Gen. 
SjTD.  zu  Berlin  Amtl.  Abdmck.  Brl  1S46.  4,  L.  RlchUr^  d.  Vcrhandlangen  d.  preuss.  GcnerabTn. 
UobcreichU.  Darst.  Lps.  1847. 

87 


578  MODERN  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  VL    A,  D.  1648-18581 

with  the  synods  proceeding  directly  from  the  congregations  in  regularly 
ascending  circles,  (o)  This  assembly  had  not  been  convened  without  some 
reference  to  its  nature,  and  only  a  single  voice  was  raised  in  it  in  behalf  of 
undisguised  rationalism.  But  as  the  great  mtyority  there,  as  well  as  in  the 
previous  provincial  synods,  declared  itself  against  not  only  unconditional  free- 
dom of  instruction,  but  the  compulsory  obligation  of  creeds,  (p)  the  party  of 
the  Evangelical  Cliurch  Journal  found  itself  in  a  decided  minority.  The 
moral  impossibility  of  compelling  men  to  adhere  to  the  old  creeds  (q)  was  con- 
ceded, and  yet  it  was  thought  indispensable  to  the  completion  of  the  Union 
that  a  confession  of  faith  should  bo  formed,  to  serve  as  a  formula  for  ordi- 
nation. But  the  confession  then  composed  expressed  only  those  sentiments 
wliich  are  essential  to  Protestant  Christianity  in  Scriptural  language,  and 
without  the  precision  of  theological  science,  (r)  The  orthodox  minority  (14 
to  48)  therefore  had  reason  to  complain,  notwithstanding  all  that  was  said 
for  their  satisfaction,  that  the  adoption  of  the  new  confession  was  a  virtual 
abrogation  of  the  old.  It  was,  however,  decided  that  those  congregations 
and  patrons  who  were  esi)ecially  attached  to  the  Lutheran  or  the  Reformed 
type  of  doctrine  or  worship,  should  have  full  liberty,  without  endangering 
the  development  and  existence  of  the  Union,  to  use  their  respective  confes- 
sions, if  they  wished  in  a  regular  manner  to  bring  those  clergymen  whom 
they  called  under  obligation  to  some  creed.  (/*)  But  the  orthodox  opp(^ition 
from  without,  in  whose  eyes  such  a  body  seemed  a  Robber-Synod,  in  which 
Christ  was  denied,  {t)  was  powerful  enough  at  least  to  postpone  the  execution 
of  these  enactments,  although  the  ecclesiastical  authorities  had  given  them  a 
unanimous  concurrence,  and  had  pronounced  them  of  urgent  importance. 
The  sujierior  Consistory  was  the  only  court  finally  formed  under  them  (Jan., 
1848),  but  as  this  was  not  sustained  by  any  contemporary  synodal  regula- 
tions, it  was  looked  upon  as  a  mere  party-authority.  In  opposition  to  the 
various  combinations  formed  by  the  pietistic  party,  a  free  association  of  Prot- 
estant Friends  was  organized  to  promote  the  interests  of  rational  and  prac- 
tical Christianity,  and  in  the  spirit  of  the  Scriptures,  and  with  all  the  means 
afforded  by  the  nineteenth  century,  to  secure  both  Christianity  and  the  im- 
provements of  the  age  as  equally  inalienable  and  inseparable  possessions.  In 
the  district  of  Middle  Germany  reached  by  railroads,  this  association  soon 
increased  from  a  small  conference  of  clergymen  (1841)  to  a  large  popular 
assembly  under  the  presidency  of  Uhlich^  a  country  pastor  of  simple  but  lib- 
eral views,  and  possessing  a  remarkable  and  continually  developing  talent  for 
presiding  over  such  a  multitude,  (m)    The  rationalism  which  appealed  wholly 


o)  Hu'fitfr,  p.  &58ML 

p)  INnliw  in  Bruns.  Rep.  1846.  vol.  YI.  p.  272s8.  Comp.  Ev.  KZ.  1845.  N.  6. 

tf)  (^)Tnp.  Brl.  KZ.  1846.  N.  65.  66.  1847.  N.  1.  a~1846.  N.  81.  86.  1847.  N.  80.  44  46. 

r)  /i'*(7t/xr,  p.  8S26a. 

«)  Krftu^r,  p.  12888.  l«5s.  Verhandll.  p.  IJUsw.  86S88.  527.    Eichter,  p.  8598& 

0  Ev.  KZ.  1*46.  N.  77.  78.  81s.  83s.  65.  868.  95.  968. 100.  lOBs.  1847.  N.  888. 14a.  26a.  29.  80iL  *•• 
tUlharJi,  in  (i.  Zfcltsch.  f.  luth.  Tlieol.  1847.  H.  8.  C.  Tlater,  Beleacht  d.  Ord.  Form.  Bmrmem  \^^ 
Comp.  BrL  KZ.  1847.  N.  47.— AiK)U.getical :  Domer,  In  the  Liter.  Z.  1847.  N.  S9a.  JhL  Jt&Uer,t 
d.  erstt*  Prcus8.  Gen.  Syn.  Bral.  1847.  On  the  other  side:  Sander,  die  modomc  TheoL  a.  d  unft* 
bl8l.  Gl.  KlLcrf.  1847. 

II)  A.  KZ.  1841.  N  187.   Brl  KZ.  1842.  N.  44. 10&  181&  N.  47.  82.  1845.  N.  40i.  45.  51.  1844  K. 


CHAP.  V.    EVANG.  CHUKCH  TILL  1858.    {  45«.  FRIENDS  OP  LIGHT.         579 

to  a  sonnd  common  sense,  hard  pressed  as  it  was  in  the  domain  of  science, 
found  its  natural  theatre  for  action  among  the  middle  classes,  and  in  these 
assemblies  exhibited  itself  as  a  popular  power,  on  which  even  the  friends  of 
the  Hegelian  philosophy,  now  almost  discarded  in  Prussia,  leaned  for  support 
At  an  assembly  held  at  C6then  in  the  spring  of  1844,  Widieenm  started  the 
question  whether  the  Scriptures  or  the  Spirit  was  the  rule  of  our  faith,  and 
tlien,  in  opposition  to  the  common  self-delusion  of  the  rationalists,  CAme  to  a 
decision  exclusively  in  favor  of  the  Spirit.  But  by  the  Spirit,  he  meant  the 
spirit  of  truth  and  love  which  always  animates  every  man,  and  especially 
every  Cliristian,  and  by  which  the  Scriptures  were  themselves  essentially  pro- 
duced. Guericke  therefore  accused  him  and  the  Friends  of  Light  generally 
of  having  renounced  Christianity,  and  in  order  to  uphold  the  absolute  author- 
ity of  the  Scriptures,  ho  did  not  hesitate,  when  pressed  with  the  inquiry 
whether  he  believed  in  the  story  of  Balaam's  speaking  ass,  to  answer 
promptly  in  the  affirmative,  (r)  Although  a  general  Protestant  feeling  even 
among  the  Protestant  Friends  was  averse  to  an  abandonment  of  the  Scrip- 
tures, this  establishment  of  a  large  party,  and  this  discussion  of  abstract  doc- 
trines before  a  multitude  entirely  incompetent  to  sit  in  judgment  upon  them, 
appeared  to  most  persons  of  doubtful  expediency,  (tr)  When  the  ministry 
of  state  in  Saxony  had,  in  accordance  with  their  oath,  prohibited  (July  17th, 
1845)  all  efforts  and  public  meetings  to  call  in  question  the  doctrines  of  the 
Augsburg  Confession,  and  other  creeds  of  the  same  general  character,  (j)  a 
royal  interpretation  of  the  law  against  popular  assemblies  in  Prussia,  applied 
it  to  the  promiscuous  meetings  of  the  Friends  of  Light.  The  consequence 
was,  that  they  soon  lost  their  importance,  and  became  once  more  nothing  but 
pastoral  conferences.  (//)  The  Evangelical  Church  Journal  in  public  adver- 
tisements announced  that  Wislicenus  and  his  associates  had  been  virtually 
excommunicated,  by  the  declarations  of  ministers,  who  in  some  instances  had 
made  public  confession,  and  in  others  had  openly  renounced  the  communion 
of  the  Church,  {z)  Hundreds  of  tliese  were  opposed  by  thousands  of  pro- 
tests from  persons  of  all  classes,  against  the  spirit  of  the  Evangelical  Church 
Journal,  {n)  Tlie  school  of  ScldciLTiiiacluT,  and  some  other  friends  of  the 
Church,  thoujrh  nor  belonging  to  the  orthodox  party,  threw  themselves  be» 
tween  the  combatants  (Aug.  15),  with  the  assertion  that  the  doctrinal  formula 
of  the  free  development  from  Christ  to  Christ  belonged  to  the  same  basis  with 


78.  Thi^ir  Orinm.*:  lil.tror  f.  cliristl.  Erbauung,  by  /?.  Fiicher,  Zeltscb.  t  prot  GelatL  by  II.  Nie^ 
tMytr  ami  /'/  ankf. 

r)  i;»erl<'':e  in  d.  Kv.  KZ.  1S44.  N.  40.  h\  57.  63.  I'J.  7».  71&  102.  G.  A.  WiiUirtrttuM,  ob  Schrlft, 
ob  Ofi.-t.  Vi'iaiitw.  ce^ron  AnkIa;;iT.  Li)*".  lst.5.  C.  /?.  A7;;«i(7,  d.  recht©  SUndp.  Mag«!fb.  l«?-t4.  On 
the  otiior  puh* :  /'.  SchettUr^  KiinJ;:-*  unruliluv?  Wort  u.  nnrechtor  Btandp.  Lp8.  1844  Guericke,  ob 
Sclir.,  ob  Gtl^t?  Kin  Coniltat  f.  d.  Dachpn-dlt't  d.  WlsL  llal.  1845.  Comp.  £.  Sohwart,  in  d.  Jen. 
A.  I^  Z  1S44.  N.  ISlas.  1845.  X.7s8. 

ir)  Vv.  d.  Verelnd-  prot  Freun«lo.  Dftnn*t.  l^iia  A.  H.  Findei^  tL  d.  OescUsch.  d.  prot.  Fr. 
Ma^'.l-1i.  1M4.  Guericke^  Llcbtfrcundthum  ii.  Kirchenth.  Lpa.  1847.— C  Ztchie^chf,  <\W  prot  Fr. 
Ein.?  ;*c-Ibhfk!ltlk.  Altenb.  1846.    Krltik  d.  prot  Fr.  Berne,  1845. 

y)  V.rV  K.  Z.  N.  CO.  D.  A  Z.  1<45.  X.  2S3.  A'.  JfaUhea,  kurze  Betr.  Q.  d.  neaesto  Bekanntm. 
J,  ?tn:it"'tnlnht  iin  K.  Sach«.  Altenb.  1845. 

u)  IJrl.  KZ.  1845.  N.  75.   1846.  N.  61.  1847.  N.  52. 

i)  Ev.  KZ.  1S44.  N.  68.  7a  79.  849.  60.  90.  92s.  95.  97. 102.  1845.  N.  9. 17.  21  St 

a)  BrL  KZ.  1845.  N.  59.  63.  6a  75. 


580  MODERN  CHUKCH  HISTOKV.    PEE.  VL    A.  D.  1648-1S68, 

tbat  which  asserted  that  Christ  was  the  only  gronnd  of  salvation,  (h)  Soch 
a  declaration  was  immediatelj  denounced  as  tlie  of&pring  of  personal  uneasi- 
ness, as  the  creed  of  the  friends  of  twilight,  and  as  a  duel  in  the  day  of  hat- 
tie,  (c)  J-Jir/ihom,  the  minister  for  public  worship,  had  once  belonged  to  the 
circle  of  Sohloiermacher's  friends,  but  he  was  urged  forward  by  the  party  of 
the  Church  Journal,  and  according  to  the  expression  used  by  that  party,  he 
sought  the  welfare  of  the  Church  though  in  weakness.  It  was  thought  that 
all  appointments  to  higher  offices  of  instruction  or  of  administration,  were 
made  in  accordance  with  the  views  of  that  party  at  the  expense  sometimes 
of  even  the  municipal  rights  of  election,  (d)  Solemn  addresses  from  the  mu- 
nicipalities of  Berlin,  Breslau,  and  Kunigsberg  prayed  for  protection  against 
the  threatened  encroachments  of  the  party  in  whose  spirit  the  ecclesiastical 
authorities  appeared  to  have  acted  in  opposition  to  the  religion  of  the  great 
majority  of  the  educated  class  among  the  i)eople  and  the  legitimate  results 
of  the  Union,  and  they  entreated  that  the  freedom  of  Protestant  instmction 
might  be  secured  so  far  as  it  was  not  inconsistent  with  public  morals  and  the 
security  of  the  state.  In  the  king's  reply,  the  interference  of  the  petitioners 
was  repelled,  their  accusations  were  reproved,  and  their  anxieties  were  dis- 
pelled, (e)  In  Kunigsberg,  Hvpp^  a  chaplain  of  a  division  in  the  army,  held 
that  Christianity  was  not  a  peculiar  form  of  religion,  but  a  nniversal  princi- 
ple of  life.  He  therefore  declared  from  tiic  pulpit  that  bo  renounced  the 
damnatory  clauses  of  the  Athanasian  creed,  on  the  ground  that  they  were 
unchristian.  Having  been  deposed  by  the  consistory  of  that  place  (Dec, 
1845),  he  resigned  his  office  in  the  consist oriul  church,  and  in  the  midst  of 
frequent  alternations  of  good  and  ill  fortune,  established  in  a  place  which  had 
previously  been  the  scene  of  political  agitations,  a  free  evangelical  congrega- 
tion (Jan.  16,  1846),  w^hich  recognized  the  Scriptures  as  a  merely  human  pro- 
duction, but  found  in  it  the  basis  of  a  faith  in  the  unity  of  God,  and  a 
supreme  rule  of  moral  conduct.  As  this  congregation  had  assumed  all  power 
over  its  own  religious  aiiaira,  its  preacher  found  that  he  was  opposed  by  a 
party  in  this  very  ideal  of  a  fraternal  congregation  of  the  nineteenth  centory, 
which  would  hardly  allow  him  to  administer  baptism  even  when  requested 
by  the  parents,  though  using  the  apostolic  formula  modernized  by  himself.  (/) 
WuUccnus  was  accused  of  elevating  himself  above  the  Iloly  Scriptures,  and 
in  his  ordinary  ecclesiastical  practice,  of  virtuaUy  dispensing  with  the  use  of  the 
apostolic  creed.  But  since  he,  according  to  the  ordinary  legal  usage  of  rational- 
ists  in  the  established  Church,  and  the  annihilation  of  their  legal  connection 


I)  Brl.  KZ.  1S45.  N.  75. 

c>  SUihl^  zwei  beuclschr.  an  dio  Untcrzelchnor  d.  Erklur.  t.  15.  Aug.  BrL  1S45.  BengUenherg: 
Ev.  KZ.  1S45.  N.  64da.  I/anns:  Brl.  KZ.  1845.  N.  77.  On  the  other  side:  {K  Henke)  Beoierk.  &. 
Stalils  Scndschr.  Brl.  1845.    Further  Lit  In  Brun^  Rep.  1S46.  vol.  VI.  p.  8288. 

d)  {EilerA)  Zur  Beurth.  d.  Minbt«:riuni8  Eicfah.  v.  e.  Mitgltede  desM.>ll>.  1S49.  Das  gebtL  Minhl 
In  Pr.  u.  d.  Min.  Eichh.  (Bruns,  Hep.  1S4S.  voL  XV.  II.  a  vol  XIX.  IL  1.) 

0)  Brl  A.  KZ.  1S45.  N.  6d.  89.  1846.  N.  IG.    Die  Theologie  des  BerL  Maglstratea.  Munrt.  1S4& 

/)  BrL  KZ.  1S46.  N.  6.  9.  11.  40.  54.  94.  97.  1M7.  N.  12.  48.  47.  C7.  70.  75.  UlHcA,  d.  VertUiwn 
gegen  Bopp.  In  d.  RecurMnstanz  v.  s.  Dcfen.'or.  Lps.  1S46.  II  Bertholdi^  KrlUk  d.  RuppiaolsmoiL 
1846.— ^tf/)/) ;  Ue.  d.  christL  Staat  K<.nlgsb.  1S42.  Die  Symbolo  oder  Oottes  Wort  Lpa.  IS46^  Off- 
ner  Brief  an  Dr.  BonBch.  LpA.  1S47.  Die  frele  ev.  K.  in  Vcrbind.  m.  GleldigMiimteo.  Altenl».  1S41 
P.  1.    Christl  ErUanngsbuch  t  froie  er.  Oemeinden.  Kunigsb.  lS46ii  8  Tola. 


CHAP.  V.    ETANO.  CHURCH  TILL  1858.    $  4M.  FREE  CONQREGATluNS.    58  1 

with  any  poblio  body,  was  nnwilling  to  bo  controlled  in  his  doctrine  and 
osages  by  any  authority  but  that  of  the  majority  of  bis  congregation,  he  was 
deposed  (April,  1846)  by  the  Consistory  of  Magdeburg  from  the  pastoral  office 
which  he  held  at  Halle,  for  gross  violations  of  the  established  order  with 
respect  to  the  liturgy  and  the  doctrines  of  the  Church.  (</)  He  collected  a 
small  congregation  professing  to  believe  in  an  always  [)rogressive  revelation, 
and  constituting  a  serious  moral  association  with  agreeable  forms  of  social 
life,  in  which  baptism  was  left  to  every  one's  own  choice,  and  no  one  claimed 
any  ecclesiastical  character.  (//)  Merely  as  an  attempt  to  form  a  congrega- 
tion at  Marhvrg^  a  few  Friends  of  Light  in  that  place  proclaimed  (Feb.,  1847) 
that  they  had  emancipated  themselves  from  the  dualism  of  humanity  and 
divinity,  and  of  time  and  eternity,  exemplified  in  the  person  of  Jesus,  and 
had  planted  themselves  on  the  universal  foundation  of  Christianity  and  Prot- 
estantism. They  professed  that  they  had  abandoned  the  fanciful  world  em- 
braced in  the  Church,  which  had  become  disgusting  to  them,  and  that  they 
had  now  advanced  to  the  more  fraternal  union  of  a  free  humanity.  (/)  But 
free  congrcgntions  sprung  up  at  first  in  the  Prussian  towns  through  the  efforts 
of  pastors  who  had  either  been  deposed,  or  were  hard  pressed  by  the  author- 
ities. They  recognized  no  definite  confessions  of  faith ;  their  Christianity 
was  a  mere  humanity;  the  only  renmant  of  the  Church  which  they  retained 
in  various  degrees,  was  a  system  of  morality  free  to  all  who  were  disposed  to 
receive  it ;  and  they  looked  upon  themselves  as  a  particular  family  of  the 
groat  human  race,  which  was  to  be  united  at  some  future  day  in  the  bonds 
of  pe.'ice.  They  kept  up  a  voluntary  form  of  association,  although  at  an 
aft*cmbly  of  their  deputies  at  Nordhausen  (Sept.,  1847),  the  representatives 
from  Marburg  and  llalle  proposed  to  give  up  the  name  of  Christian,  thus 
reducing  to  practice  the  fanciful  idea  of  the  PhiJalethea  of  Kiel,  who  only 
wished  to  ignore  Christianity,  and  to  use  the  most  general  forms  of  piety,  (k) 
The  consistories  maintained  their  jurisdiction  over  those  separated  congrega- 
tions, and  punishment  was  inflicted  upon  particuhir  individuals  for  an  unau- 
thorized performance  of  ministerial  acts,  and  the  marriages  solenmized  by 
them  were  treated  as  illicit  until  the  Edict  of  Toleration  (March  80,  1847), 
which,  on  the  one  hand,  defined  the  existing  law  so  as,  in  the  spirit  of  Frederic 
the  Great,  to  permit  any  number  of  licensed  chapels  of  another  faith  to  be  built 
around  the  Evangelical  and  Catholic  national  churches ;  and  on  the  other, 
declared  the  principle  that  certain  civil  rights  were  not  dependent  upon  cer- 
tain religious  acts  of  a  religious  society  recognized  by  the  state.  (/)  Tho 
orthodox  party  was  pleased  with  this  law,  because  it  proposed  a  way  by 


g)  O.  Eberty,  Schutrsclir.  f  WW.  (lurch  r  crwublten  Verthoi<lIsrer.  AUenb.  1S46.  Die  Aint«ent- 
Mti.  d.  Pfiirrera  O.  A.  Wbl.  ActcmntUvi;:  (largest  durcli.  O.  A.  Wisl  LpA.  Ib4^ 

A)  Brl.  KZ.  1S4G.  N.  Mrt.  Sa.  1>47.  N.  7.  Letter  to  K.inijjsborg :  ///*'/.  1S4C.  N.  41.  Orfran : 
KlrebL  Reform.  Monatsachr.  f.  frcio  Protestantcn.  Hal.  ISlCsa.— /2.  Arn/oy,  (L  rroU  Freumle  u.  •!. 

Joden.  LpiL  1S47. 

0  BrL  K25.  1846.  N.  6S.  1847.  N.  7.  15.  Bayrhqfer^  d.  wahre  Wesen  d.  pegcnw.  rel.  Ret  In 
DeotachL  Mannh.  1846. 

*)  Brl.  KZ.  1845.  N.  »a  90. 1846.  N.  102.  \%\1.  N.  4.  6.  9.  63.  67.  Ed,  Bitltzer,  d.  deuUJie  K.  Son- 
Jmb.  1M7.  2  H.— Entw.  e.  Bittschr.  an  deuti«che  Fftrhten.  Kiel,  InIO.  Grunds.  d.  n-l.  Wahrholth- 
(V«nnde.  K.  188a  VorluuH  Nuchricbt  v.  d.  iin  Miirz  1812.  gestifteten  llolrt.  Pl.IlHletljenv.Teln. 
iZeitach.  t  hist  Tb.  1S39.  IL  2.)         /)  BrL  KZ.  l!>47.  N.  29s. 


582  MOD£SN  CIIUBCH  HISTORY.    FEB.  YL    A.  D.  1648-1808. 

which  the  Rationalists  might  leave  the  Church.  AcoordiDglj,  UJdich  (ajfter 
1845),  the  preacher  in  St.  Catharine^s  church  at  Magdebnrg,  was  thus  pro- 
voked to  leave  the  Church.  He  however  at  first  refused  to  do  so  on  account 
of  the  beneficial  influence  which  he  hoped  to  exert  upon  the  Great  Churck 
as  his  exemplary  character  was  zealously  vouched  for  by  his  congregation, 
and  the  city  in  which  ho  ministered.  But  when  he  was  asked  by  the  consd^ 
tory,  whether  he  would  subsequently  conform  with  punctuality  to  the  require- 
ments of  the  Agenda,  and  in  no  way  assail  the  creed  of  the  Evangelical 
Church,  he  hesitated  to  give  an  affirmative  answer  without  some  conditions, 
and  prayed  for  Christian  forbearance  and  indulgence.  Ho  was  then  suspended 
(Sept.,  1847),  that  by  a  regular  process  of  discipline  he  might  be  legally  de- 
posed. Referring  to  the  publicity  of  his  instructions  and  his  example,  he 
appealed  to  the  Evangelical  Church  in  Germany,  in  opposition  to  a  coik^istory 
which,  under  the  influence  of  party  zeal,  he  said  was  about  to  rend  the 
Church  into  a  variety  of  sects,  (m)  and  as  a  defence  in  case  of  nccesaty 
against  the  present  ecclesiastical  government,  established  a  more  numerous 
congregation  than  had  before  been  formed  (in  the  time  of  its  highest  prosperity 
it  numbered  five  thousand  members).  The  legal  existence  of  this  congregation 
was  secured  by  a  compliance  with  the  terms  of  the  Edict  of  Toleration  (Jan., 
1848),  and  its  permanency  by  a  well-devLsed  congregational  polity,  through 
which  it  became  rich  in  works  of  charity.  In  its  original  charter  it  bore  also 
a  decidedly  evangelical  character,  {n)  but  this  was  endangered  by  its  connec- 
tion with  other  free  congregations,  and  by  the  different  parties  which  had  an 
existence  in  it. — The  great  storm  of  Marcli,  1848,  soon  destroyed  the  odious 
name  of  an  ecclesiastical  administration.  Count  Schweririy  the  minister  for 
public  woi*dhip,  admonished  the  consistories,  in  accordance  with  the  princi- 
ples of  religious  liberty  adopted  by  the  royal  government,  to  give  the  pref- 
erence to  no  dogmatic  or  theological  party  whatever,  and  to  look  only  that, 
in  the  spirit  of  evangelical  charity.  Christian  truth  be  promoted  on  the  basis 
of  the  word  of  God.  (o)  He  dissolved  the  Superior  Consistory,  and  gave 
orders  for  a  committee  to  devise  a  synodal  constitution,  to  be  submitted  to  an 
imperial  synod  which  should  soon  after  be  convened,  that  thus  the  Church 
might,  according  to  a  frequently  expressed  wish  of  the  king,  construct  her 
future  organization  for  herself,  (p)  The  outline  of  the  electoral  law  for  the 
appointing  synods,  was  published  and  defended  by  counsellors  of  the  crown 
versed  in  ecclesiastical  law.  It  proposed  that  the  deputies  should  be  elected 
by  the  congregations,  but  that  the  existing  synods  should  be  made  use  of  in 
the  Western,  and  that  district  and  provincial  synods  should  be  arranged  so  as 
to  serve  for  electoral  bodies  in  the  Eastern  provinces,  (g)  But  during  the 
patriotic  movements  which  so  happily  corresponded  with  the  ideals  the  king 
had  formed,  his  piety  was  deeply  wounded  by  the  pedantic  outrage  which 


ni)  Vtdich:  Bckcnntnlsse.  Lps.  ISiS.  Christenth.  u.  K.  Lpa.  1S46.  IT  Satze  in  Betngr  ••  d.  Ver 
pflichtung>formel  d.  Syno^le  In  Berl.  Wolfenb.  1S47.— Amtl.  Verhandll.  (dU  July  »;  1347.)  betr.  d*0 
Pred  Uhllch.  Mapleb.  1S47.  Weltere  MlttbeDI.  in  Sachen  d.  Uhlich,  ed.  by  blmsdC  Wolfenb.  1S47. 
BrL  KZ.  1S47.  N.  19.  65.  1852.  N.  16.  A.  KZ.  1S47.  N.  151  D.  A.  Z.  1847.  N.  19».  816.  Sift.  UhL  Ppd- 
teJ.L:  A.  Z.  f.  Chrbtonth.  u.  K.  1S47.  N.  SI.— Moeli^r  n.  Uhllch.  Lps.  184T. 

n)  BrL  KZ.  1S47.  N.  94.         o)  Of  April  24  BrL  KZ.  1848.  N.  88. 

/>)  Ibid.  N.  81.  86.         q)  U  liichter,  Vortrag  CL  d.  Boruftuig  t.  ev.  UndeasyiL  Bri.  1848L 


CHAP.  y.    SYANG.  CHUSCH  TILL  1858.    $458.  LADENBEBG.    SAUMEB.      583 

aimed  to  deprive  royalty  of  its  claim  to  exist  by  the  grace  of  God.  Before 
the  appointed  synod  could  actually  come  together,  the  revolution  was  over- 
thrown, and  the  Evangelical  Ohurch  Journal  denounced  the  clamor  for  a 
synodal  constitution  as  an  ill-concealed  enmity  to  Christ,  and  the  whole 
scheme  of  an  election  by  the  people  as  a  denial  of  God.  (r)  The  provisional 
ministry  of  Ladenherg  inquired  (Jan.,  1849)  of  the  consistories,  faculties,  and 
select  men  of  learning,  what  measures  should  be  taken  to  secure  to  the  Evan- 
gelical Church,  by  a  constitution,  the  independent  management  of  its  own  affairs. 
The  numerous  replies  which  it  received,  were  tilled  with  doubts  jih  to  the  ex- 
pediency of  any  synod  which  might  be  chosen  by  the  people  to  form  a  constitu- 
tion. (<r)  The  constitution  of  Jan.  81, 1850,  granted  by  the  crown,  contained 
many  criticisms  on  itself,  but  the  deputies  united  in  it.  and  swore  allegiance 
to  it.  With  respect  to  religion,  the  whole  essential  spirit  of  the  German  ftm- 
damental  laws  was  retained ;  but  as  the  opi)osite  parties,  the  ouo  rejoicing 
and  the  other  lamenting,  had  fallen  into  the  notion  that  the  state,  by  its  sep- 
aration from  the  Church,  had  become  unchristian  and  atheistic,  it  was  added, 
that  whenever  the  state  made  any  regulations  with  reference  to  religion, 
they  should  be  on  the  basis  of  Christianity.  A  collegiate  sujironie  council 
for  deciding  upon  the  internal  atlairs  of  the  Church,  was  formed,  by  the 
order  of  the  king,  from  the  evangelical  i)ortion  of  the  ministry  of  public 
worship,  and  a  system  of  rules  for  the  regulation  of  congregationid  atiairs, 
was  bestowed  upon  the  six  eastern  provinces.  (0  The  supreme  ecclesiastical 
council  from  that  period  governed  the  Church  in  the  king^s  name,  and  tan 
Rainner^  the  minister  for  public  worship,  in  the  presence  of  the  Chambers 
declared  that  the  new  doctrine  was,  that  the  Evangelical  Church  exercises 
her  constitutional  right  independently  to  regulate  and  administer  her  atfairs, 
by  its  entire  separation  from,  and  consecjuent  independence  of  the  state,  and 
its  government  according  to  its  ancient  constitution,  by  the  sovereign  as  its 
most  prominent  member,  (w)  By  this  happy  thought,  anxiety  for  the  inde- 
pendence of  the  Church  was  tranquillized,  and  the  Chambei-s  succeeded  in 
repelling  all  complaints  about  violations  of  those  articles  of  the  fundamental 
law  of  the  state  which  relate  to  the  independence  of  the  Evangelical  Church.  (/•) 
The  plan  for  congregational  government,  which  was  looked  upon  as  the  basis  of 
true  ecclesiastical  freedom,  contained  a  suspicious  limitation  of  the  power  of 
choosing  the  vestries,  and  an  extraordinary  requisition  that  the  private  mem- 
bers should  be  bound  by  the  three  principal  creeds,  the  confessions  of  the 
Reformation,  and  certain  general  laws  for  the  Church  which  were  yet  un- 
known. In  some  of  the  Ciistern  provinces,  this  plan  was  i>rotestod  against 
by  parties  opposed  to  each  other,  but  it  was  at  last  gradually  admitted  into 


r)  Brl.  KZ.  1S49.  N.  a 

•)  Amtl.  GutachU'n  cL  VorC  il.  ov.  K.  in  Pr.  Iwtr.   Iin  Auftrage  f^urch  L  Klchtcr.  Brl.  1S49. 

0  Of  Jan.  26,  ls49.  and  June  '29.  1&5<1  Allorh«.clister  Erlasi.  botr.  <L  Orumlzau't'  e.  Geinclnde- 
Ord.  u.  d.  Einsotz.  d  Ev.  OlK-rkircheur.  neb>t  Aktenst.  Brl.  laiO.  Cuuip.  J.  JtuUer^  DcuUcbo 
Zeltflch.  f.  chr.  WL>«.  1S51.  N.  Iss. 

«)  Feb.  8.  1S61.   Brl.  KZ.  1«C)1.  N.  IS.  15. 17. 

r)  Die  Sclbj'Undigk.  d.  ov.  Lande»k.  a.  ihro  VoUzichung  darcb  das  Cultui>iiiln.  Aktrnmasslg  dar- 
gest  iL  der  zwcitcn  Pr.  Kammer  aebcrrcicht  v.  Jonas,  8yduw,  Eltc&ter,  Krau»e,  IJago,  Mueller. 
BrL  ld51. 


584  MODERN  CHUECH  HISTORY.    PER.  VL    A.  D.  l«48-165flL 

most  of  tlie  congregations,  (tr)  The  supreme  ecclesiastical  ooTmcil  added 
many  salutary  provisions  for  the  order,  discipline,  and  temporal  wants  of  tlie 
national  Church,  but  under  great  disadvantages  on  account  of  its  origin,  and 
in  the  midst  of  much  opposition  to  its  jurisdiction,  (r)  As  a  natural  result 
of  the  political  reaction,  the  power  of  the  orthodox  party  was  increased,  and 
its  eloquent  legal  advocate  endeavored  to  show  that  the  revolution  was  the 
appropriate  consequence  of  Rationalism ;  that  the  essential  spirit  of  both  was 
the  alienation  of  man  from  his  God ;  (y)  that  authority  should  henceforth  take 
the  plac«  of  the  majority ;  and  that  the  king  might,  under  certain  pious 
forms,  be  properly  exonerated  from  his  sinful  oath  to  support  the  fundamen- 
tal civil  laws,  (z)  Some  ecclesiastical  authorities  at  ordinations  demanded  a 
stricter  adherence  to  the  articles  of  faith  than  had  been  usually  required ; 
and  even  pastors,  who  could  receive  the  confession  in  only  some  i>eculiar 
ideal  sense,  were  subjected  to  examinations  which  had  long  been  discontinued, 
and  which  terminated  in  their  deposition,  (a)  Questions  were  also  proposed  to 
candidates  for  theological  professorships,  which  could  not  be  answered,  as  was 
required,  in  the  affirmative,  without  a  renunciation  of  all  theological  investi- 
gation, (h)  The  free  congregations  (numbering  about  forty  in  Prussia  and  the 
contiguous  countrie:^),  which  had  in  1848,  like  almost  all  associations,  taken 
some  part  in  politics,  and  whose  leaders  had  to  some  extent  been  involved  in 
the  movements  of  the  day,  h.nd  nearly  all  their  houses  of  worship  closed  by 
the  police  under  the  new  law  against  political  societies.  These  proceedings 
were  partially  confirmed  by  the  jurlioinl  courts,  but  some  measures  of  the 
police  seemed  so  inconsistent  with  the  freedom  of  conscience  guarantied  by 
the  fundamental  laws,  that  inquiries  were  instituted  respecting  them  even  in 
the  Chambers  (1852),  where  the  government  had  avowed  its  determination 
to  exterminate  by  every  legal  means  the  whole  system  of  dissent,  (c)  The 
supreme  ecclesiastical  council  excommunicated  all  the  free  congregations, 
without  reference  to  the  various  tendencies  among  them,  and  pronounced 
their  baptisms  invalid,  {d)  yet  the  civil  courts  punished  every  official  act  of 
their  ministers  as  an  invasion  of  the  clerical  office,  (e)  But  no  mere  liberty 
without  religious  energy,  nor  connections  with  even  impious  men,  who  denied 
the  existence  of  a  living  God,  nor  popular  adulation,  to  which  their  best  lead- 
ers felt  constrained  to  resort,  nor  persecution  itself,  have  been  found  sufficient 
for  the  salvation  of  those  people.  (/)  i?w/>/>,  however,  endeavored  to  obtain 
a  higher  degree  of  purity,  by  a  legal  dissolution  of  the  old,  and  the  formation 


K)  Alljr.  KBlatt  £  d.  ev.  Dcutachl.  1S,')2.  N.  83»8.  1853.  N.  86ss.— (?.  Schueriti'9  Protest:  BrL 
KZ.  1851.  N.  65. 

a*)  Aktonstucke  a.  d.  Verwalt  d.  Abth.  d.  Mlnist  t  d.  innero  ev.  KSftchen.  Brl.  1850.  Aktenit 
a.  d.  Verw.  d  ev.  OKKaths.  BrL  1851s.  5  11. 

i/)  F.  J.  Stahi,  was  bt  die  Kov.  ?  BrL  1852.  Yet  Comp.  Ibid.  d.  FrotestaDt.  als  pollt  ^rind^ 
(Ev.  KZ.  1S.")8.  N.  28.) 

«)  Brlefe  ii.  Staatskunst  BrL  1858.    Yet  Et.  KZ.  1858.  N.  Is. 

a)  W.  F.  SlnUni*^  Moelh-r's  Wirken  In  Consist  u.  In  d.  Gen.  Super.  Lps.  1849.  J,  H.  Balbtr, «. 
Qlanbf  nsgerlcht  In  dc-r  MItte  d.  19  Jalirh.  Lps.  1850. 

h)  Z<Ii8ch.  f.  unlrte  K.  1S53.  vol  XV.  N.  83.         c)  Brl,  KZ.  1852.  N.  6.  9. 

d)  Aktcnst  d.  OKRaths.  II.  2.  p.  «6.««a        e)  Brl  KZ.  1851.  N.  87.  77. 1S62.  N.  11. 

/)  WftBsgerber,  Donai's  none  rel.  Meuselw.  1851.  C.  ZtchUscht^  d.  ftt;ie  Gemelnde,  fhre  WIrk- 
samk.  u.  Ihre  Stlmujfurer  Jn  d,  Pr.  Sachscn.  Ualbrst  1860. 


CHAP.  V.    ETANG.  CnURCH  TILL  1853.    $  456.  LUTHERANISM.  585 

of  a  new  but  small  congregation  (Oct.,  1853),  in  wliich  the  Bible  was  re- 
garded as  the  original  source  of  tmth,  and  the  imitation  of  Christ  was  made 
the  snprcme  end  of  life,  (g)  The  orthodox  portion,  on  the  other  liand,  which 
had  recently  become  so  artificially  prominent,  was  compelled  once  more,  and  in 
more  general  relations,  to  be  as  exclusive  as  Luther  himself.  But  these  Luther- 
ans were  so  confident  of  success,  and  so  little  troubled  with  conscientious  scru- 
ples, that  although  they  had  before  formed  an  association  at  Leipsic  composed 
of  clergymen  behmging  to  the  different  national  churches,  and  in  friendly 
connection  with  the  Separatists  for  the  maintenance  of  the  Lutheran  confes- 
sion ;  and  although,  according  to  this  association,  the  modern  notion  of  union 
in  the  fundamental  doctrines  of  the  two  confessions  was  nothing  but  a  syn- 
cretism of  many  chameleon  forms,  (//)  they  refused  to  attach  themselves  to 
the  Church  of  Luther  which  the  Separatists  had  formed,  but  under  the  con- 
duct of  the  fugitive  president  of  the  Consistory  of  Magdeburg,  they  consti- 
tntcd  over  the  graves  of  the  Reformers  a  league  (Sept.,  1849)  for  carrying  out 
the  Lutheran  confession,  even  in  its  provif^ions  for  public  worship,  congrega- 
tional order,  and  the  government  of  the  national  Church.  (/)  In  the  king- 
dom of  Saxony,  they  had  in  their  favor  tlio  letter  of  tlie  law,  and  the  coun- 
tenance of  the  rulers,  and  in  Electoral  Hesse  they  had  at  least  the  latter 
advantage.  In  Bavaria,  although  the  younger  clergy  on  the  eastern  side  of 
the  Rhine  had  been  educated  at  Erlangen  under  their  influence,  the  more 
zealous  portion  declared  that  they  had  already  taken  the  staff  to  leave  a 
Church  whose  altar  had  been  polluted  by  the  admission  of  the  members  of 
the  united  Ciiurch,  and  that  they  only  waited  to  see  if  it  could  not  be  freed 
from  this  impurity,  (l)  In  Prussia,  they  demanded  that  the  Union,  which 
they  declared  had  never  been  legally  formed,  and  denounced  as  confu.'»ion  and 
revolution,  should  be  utterly  dissolved.  Internal  dissensions,  like  those 
which  usually  distract  a  triumphant  party,  began  already  to  prevail,  princi- 
pally with  respect  to  the  question,  whether  those  invested  with  the  clerical 
ofiice  were  endowed  with  special  grace  as  the  solo  depositaries  of  ecclesiasti- 
cal power.  (/)  By  the  separated  Lutherans  their  whole  course  was  declared 
to  be  a  lie.  Ouericle^  the  confessor  of  Lutheranism,  and  afterwards  much 
abused  as  an  apostate  from  it,  once  more  abandoned  the  fellowship  of  the 
rigid  Lutherans,  where  he  had  vainly  hoped  to  find  a  Christian  spirit  and 
freedom  for  a  Lutheran  conscience.  (///)  While  those  who  were  faithful  to 
the  Union  charged  the  supreme  council  with  having  sacrificed  it,  prayer  was 
offered  in  a  Lutheran  pulpit  for  an  orthodox  supreme  council,  and  even  then 
the  existence  of  that  which  then  ruled  the  Church  was  declared  to  be  a 
sin.  (u)     It  however  agreed  that  it  regarded  only  those  congregations  in 

g)  D.  A.  Z.  1S53.  N.  253.        h)  Ev.  KZ.  1849.  N.  61. 

0  BrL  KZ.  1S4S.  N.  94. 1549.  N.  77. -Die  Lcipzeiger  Konforenz  am  81.  Aug.  an.l  1.  Sept  1S53. 
(X<iAn/«,  &.  d.  UnlonsdoctriD.)  Lp&  1S58. 

k)  Brl.  KZ.  1850.  N.  65.  1852.  N.  1.  JTommel,  Recht  d.  K.,  Union  u.  d.  baj.  prot.  Landeak. 
An»p.  1S58. 

/)  J.  W.  r.  mtfiing,  Orundafitz*  ev.  luth.  KVerf.  Erl.  (185a)  1861.— JTKrlv,  t,  Lehre  v.  d.  K 
(Zeltuch.  t  Inth.  Th.  1S52.  U.  1.) 

m)  G\*€rivkf^  Ven()hnllches  Q.  brennende  KFragen  d.  Oegenw.  Lps.  1852. 

n)  Brl.  KZ.  1S52.  N.  94  Otto,  Sup.  in  Naugard,  in  d.  Denksch.  d.  luth.  yert*ln.<«  in  Poznincrn,  a. 
d.  Antwort  des  OKBaths:  Aktcnat.  II.  &  i>.  898a.    C<nni>.  Otto,  Monataachrift.  1861m. 


5SG  MODERN  CUUBCU  HISTORY.    PER.  VL    A.  D.  tM8-1858L 

Silesia  as  truly  united  in  the  Confession,  which  conld  show  the  original  docu- 
ments relating  to  the  Union ;  it  delivered  the  whole  of  Pomerania,  which 
really  possessed  them,  over  to  the  exclusively  Lutheran  Confession ;  and  it 
conceded  that  particular  pastors  might  dispense  at  will  with  the  breaking  of 
the  bread,  which  was  looked  upon  as  the  symbol  of  the  Union,  and  that  the 
Silesian  consistory  might  separate  into  three  parts,  so  as  to  form  a  Lutheran, 
a  Kcfortned,  and  a  United  division,  with  a  council  for'  each  Confession,  (o) 
Even  the  Evangelical  Church  Journal  had  already  long  doubted  with  regard 
to  the  enthusiasm  it  had  displayed  for  the  Union  under  Frederic  William  III., 
and  it  found  an  occasion  for  a  cliange  of  course  in  its  opposition  to  a  Union 
which  absorbed  all  the  Confessions.  (;>)  The  king  made  known  to  the  Lu- 
theran association  (1850)  his  desire  to  establish  consistories  and  superior 
authorities  in  tlie  Church,  which  in  the  eastern  provinces  should  be  Lutheran, 
with  Reformed  assessors ;  (q)  and  ho  gave  orders  that,  in  order  to  preserve 
the  independence  of  the  two  confessions  in  the  Union,  the  supreme  ecclesias- 
tical council  should  consist  of  members  from  both  confessions,  and  that  all 
business  which  could  properly  bo  decided  by  but  one  of  the  confessions, 
should  be  left  to  the  votes  of  those  who  belonged  to  that  confession.  The 
same  division  was  also  to  be  made  in  the  consistories,  (r)  The  supreme  coun- 
cil separated  into  two  divisions,  according  as  they  were  members  of  the 
Lutheran  or  tlie  Reformed  confessions.  Dr.  NiUsch  alone  preferred  to  adhere 
to  the  consensus  of  the  two  confessions,  and  was  therefore  released  from  all 
participation  In  the  decision  of  confessional  questions,  but  he  was  held  up  as 
the  patron  df  the  congregations  united  in  the  confession  by  the  original  docu- 
ment. 0  These  proceedings  were  regarded  by  the  Lutherans  as  a  legal  dis- 
solution of  the  Union,  and  they  now  therefore  demanded  in  Luther's  name, 
that  the  monster  of  the  authorities  of  the  united  Church  which  still  existed 
should  be  completely  abolished ;  that  purely  Lutheran  faculties,  or  at  least 
professors,  should  be  appointed ;  and  that  the  patrimony  of  the  Lutheran 
Church  should  be  restored,  {t)  Even  those  advocates  of  orthodoxy  who  had 
formerly  been  moderate  in  their  demands,  now  raised  the  watchword  that 
those  who  governed  the  Church  appeared  to  give  their  countenance  not  to 
the  Union,  but  to  its  opponents,  and  that  the  natural  result  of  this  should  be 
the  separation  of  clergymen  and  congregations,  until  finally  the  royal  regeat 
of  the  Church  would  be  the  only  individual  belonging  to  the  united  body,  (tf) 
Indeed,  the  old  traditions  and  necessary  policy  peculiar  to  the  Hohenzolltfn 
family  seemed  entirely  forgotten  in  the  pleasure  which  all  seemed  to  feel  in 
the  separation  of  the  confessions.  The  king  then  avowed  his  just  displeasure 
at  the  unfair  interpretation  given  to  his  orders  of  the  previous  year.  He  de- 
clared that  he  had  never  intended  to  disturb  the  Union,  and  thus  produce  a 


6\  Aktcnst  IT.  1.  p.  4068.  VL.  2.  p.  14»s.  Brl.  KZ.  1853.  n.  80.    Aktenst  d.  Abth.  d.  Minis!  pi  7(lK 

p)  First  in  1S44.  N.  2a.  1847.  N.  1.-1849.  X.  Sss.  1851.  N.  4 

q)  Printed  by  //uw,  K.  d.  dt  Reicha.  p.  277.   . 

r)  Order  of  the  Cabinet,  March  6, 1852 :  Brl  KZ.  1852.  N.  88.  InstmctioDS  for  the  conslstoriM: 
Jbid,  N.  41.         h)  Ibid.  N.  63. 

0  0[>en  Deolar.  in  the  Monatsschr.  Jane,  1852.  Lath.  Ocn.  Conf.  at  Witt  S«pt  1853. :  BrL  K& 
1852.  N.  82.   A.  KZ.  1852.  N.  105. 

V)  Brl  KZw  1852.  N.  61.  90.    Deutsche  Zeltsch.  C  chr.  Wisa.  1858.  N.  Isa.  10m. 


CHAP.  V.    EVANG.  CHURCH  TILL  1853.    §  457.    BEBLIN  EVANO.  CONFER.     587 

division  of  the  nationtd  Church,  nor  to  renew  the  old  controversy  about  the 
confessions.  The  ecclesiastical  authorities  were  therefore  directed  to  oppose 
all  attempts  to  separate  the  two  confessions,  to  allow  no  synods,  or  even  indi- 
vidual clergymen  or  congregations,  to  lay  aside  the  name  of  Evangelical  Con- 
gregations, or  the  ritual  prescribed  for  the  Union ;  and  only  on  the  united 
request  of  a  clergyman  and  his  congregation,  after  all  proper  means  and  per- 
suasions had  been  tried,  to  permit  particular  congregations  to  deviate  from 
the  regulations  prescribed  for  the  Evangelical  National  Church.  (')  Two 
views  of  this  proceeding  were  expressed  among  the  Lutherans :  one  was  that 
of  painful  disappointment  from  a  conviction  that  this  order  of  the  cabinet 
was  a  complete  renunciation  of  the  previous  legislation ;  and  the  other  looked 
upon  it  as  a  mere  check  to  the  wavering  course  of  tlie  whole  policy  for  the 
Union,  (/r) 

§  457.     Comhinatiojis. 

The  Evangdicnl  Conference  assembled  at  Berlin  in  consequence  of  a  wish 
expressed  by  the  Kings  of  Wnrtemberg  and  Prussia,  that  the  Evangelical 
Church  of  Germany  might  be  more  perfectly  united,  and  continued  in  ses- 
sion from  January  Gth  to  February  14th,  1846.  Some  hopes  were  enter- 
tained in  it  of  forming  a  union  by  a  stricter  construction  of  doctrines,  and 
Bome  violent  measures  were  proposed  for  the  accomplishment  of  such  an  ob- 
ject. But  as  the  great  miyority  were  only  in  favor  of  securing,  on  the  basis 
of  the  confessions,  the  two  fundamental  doctrines  which  asserted  that  the 
Scriptures  were  the  only  source  of  the  knowledge  of  saving  truth,  and  that 
justification  was  by  faith,  this  diplomatic  assembly  from  its  nature  could 
only  exchange  views  and  make  arrangements  for  an  intercourse  between  the 
different  parts  of  the  common  church  by  annual  assemblies,  (a).  The  Church 
Conference^  which  had  been  for  a  while  suspended,  was  resumed  at  the  sug- 
gestion of  a  private  company  of  persons,  and  of  a  journal  used  as  an  official 
organ  by  the  ecclesiastical  authorities  of  all  Germany,  (h)  It  was  held  after 
Pentecost  1852  and  1853  at  the  foot  of  the  Wartburg,  and  was  intended  to 
be  a  meeting  of  deputies  from  the  supreme  authorities  of  most  of  the  national 
German  churches  for  confidential  conference,  but  with  no  legislative  powers,  (c) 
But  although  these  spiritual  and  secular  authorities  of  the  Church  stood  in 
this  independent  position  with  respect  to  each  other,  some  of  them  believed 
in  the  development  of  Protestantism  and  in  the  Union,  while  others  saw  no 
reality  in  either.  But  as  all  were  anxious  to  preserve  the  blessing  of  some 
visible  form  of  unity  for  the  whole  Protestant  Church  of  Germany,  questions 
of  a  deeper  and  more  dreaded  nature  were  held  at  a  distance.  The  expe- 
rience and  the  wishes  of  different  individuals  were  here  compared,  and  a 


c)  Cabinet  Order  of  July  12, 1S53 :   ZcitBch.  t  unlrte  ev.  K.  1858.  N.  85. 

tr)  Lmh.  Gen.  C^onf.  at  Witt.  ScpL  1S58:  Ev.  KZ  1S58.  N.  83.  Comp.  73.  T9a.  Counter  asacrUon 
of  the  kitif:  to  tlu;  WiiL  Conf.  of  Oct  11 :   D.  A.  Z.  1858  N.  2Ta 

a)  Literur.  rro^ainine:  C.  UUmann  (p.  572.  nt.  e.)  Official  action :  Loccumcr  Artlkel.  ^I)lo  Vor- 
■eliliijre  d.  Dr.  Snothlagc  k  Kappetoln  z.  Verein  d.  ev.  K.  DeuUichL  mit^etheilt  y.  Perez,  Grim.  1S46. 
BrL  KZ.  IS  16.  N.  7. 11.  2*^.  33 )— Account  in  Biedcnnann,  ansre  Gcgcnw.  a.  Zuk.  1:140.  II.  S.  Die Kc- 
•nltat4!  d.  IWrl.  Kunf  L|>8.  1846.    Comp.  Bruna,  Kep.  1S46.  vol  VL  p.  229iw. 

I)  WXiz.  Kirchenblatt  fTtr  d.  ev.  Deut!^^hland,  ed.  by  C.  0.  Moaer.  Stiittg.  I.  1>52.  II.  1S53. 

c)  Protocola :  KUUtt  1652.  N.  la  1853.  N.  29aa.  BrL  KZ.  1S52.  N.  17.  86.  89.  45a.  1858.  N.  4A.  47. 


588  MODERN  CnUBCH  IIISTOET.    PER.  YL    ▲.  D.  1»4S-195& 

choice  collection  of  hymns  for  a  general  hyinn-book  was  adopted,  (d)  thongh 
not  till,  in  the  committee  of  invited  persons  conversant  with  such  matters, 
one  party  contending  for  the  adoption,  at  every  hazard,  of  the  old  text,  had 
been  excluded,  and  another,  wishing  to  preserve  the  ecclerfastical  poetry  of 
the  eighteenth  century,  had  been  set  aside  without  a  hearing  of  its  peculiar 
views,  (e)  A  desire  which  had  been  expressed  at  a  secular  festival  on  the 
field  of  Lutzen,  to  erect  a  monument  to  the  heroic  death  of  Gustavus  Adol- 
phus,  by  obtaining  minute  contributions  from  the  people,  was  so  modified, 
when  tlie  sovereign  himself  erected  a  monument  over  the  Swedish  stone,  as 
to  lead  to  the  idea  of  a  charitable  institution  bearing  his  name,  to  sustain  those 
evangelical  congregations  which,  in  the  neighboring  Catholic  countries,  were 
unable  to  endure  the  expense  needful  for  their  ecclesiastical  support.  The 
Gustarus  Adolphns  InHitution  in  Saxony,  with  some  assistance  from  Sweden, 
collected  (after  1834)  a  small  capital,  the  interest  of  which  was  barely  suffi- 
cient to  render  the  necessity  of  such  aid  more  apparent.  Finally  an  i4>peal 
from  Darmstadt  (Oct.  81,  1841)  produced  another  effort  in  connection  with 
the  Saxon  institution,  though  in  a  superior  style  (1842).  An  assembly  was 
then  held  at  Frankfort  (1843),  at  which  a  wise  division  of  labor  was  made 
among  various  auxiliary  associations,  with  a  central  committee  at  Leipsic,  and 
a  superior  movable  assembly  of  deputies  returning  at  fixed  intervals.  The 
result  of  all  these  proceedings  was  the  establishment  of  an  Evangelical  Society 
of  the  Gustavus  Adolphus  Institution,  which,  as  a  Protestant  German  popular 
cause,  collects  the  means  for  sustaining  and  building  churches  for  many  poor 
and  almost  extinct  congregations.  (/)  The  German  governments,  though  in 
some  cases  with  reluctance,  yielded  to  the  popular  influence  of  this  associa- 
tion, though  in  Bavaria  it  was  proscribed  until  1848,  on  the  ground  that  it 
was  hostile  to  the  Catholic  Church,  and  inconsistent  with  the  German  char- 
acter, {g)  As  it  was  founded  principally  by  the  liberal  party,  Ilengstenberg 
pronounced  the  association  a  great  lie,  {h)  and  the  Prussian  crown  was  unwil- 
ling to  sustain  any  but  an  independent  Prussian  society  under  the  patronage 
of  the  king,  (i)  But  as  every  effort  was  likely  to  be  paralyzed  by  this  sepa- 
ration, the  government  finally  yielded  to  the  popular  will,  and  at  the  assem- 
bly at  Gottingen  (1844)  the  Prussian  deputies  extended  to  it  the  hand  of 
brotherhood.  (Jc)  The  internal  importance  of  the  society,  in  spite  of  the  lim- 
ited nature  of  its  external  objects,  resulted  from  the  fact  that  it  was  a  neutral 
holy  ground  on  which  all  parties  in  the  Evangelical  Church  could  meet,  and 
on  which  that  Church  could  once  more  be  seen  as  an  undivided  power.  When 
therefore,  at  the  assembly  at  Gottingen,  it  was  asked  that  more  definite  quali- 
fications should  be  named  for  admission  to  the  association  than  a  mere  agree- 


d)  Dtfutscbes  cv.  KlrchenjreKangbuch  in  150  Kernliedcrn. 

«)  J.  G^fcken,  d.  all?,  ev.  OcMngb.  n.  d.  dar&bcr  gefuhrtcn  YerbandlL  Hamb.  18S8L 

/)  I-tipz.  Z.  1832.  N.  164.  1838.  N.  11.  A.  K.  Z.  1985.  N.  9.  66. 1S41.  N.  19.  80.  172.  139.  «08L  1941 
N.  107. 133.  1.39. 174.  Orsran.  since  the  Assemb.  at  Frankfort :  Der  Bote  des  ev.  Yerelns  d.  O.  A.  Stlf 
tang.  Issued  by  K.  Zlinmermnnn. 

g)  A.  K.  z!  In  14.  N.  34.  45.    Brl.  K.  Z.  1549.  N.  TflL 

h)  Kv.  K.  Z.  1M4.  N.  rt  yet  romp.  7j».    A.  K.  Z.  1844.  N.  41. 

0  Cabinet  cr.l.  r  c.f  r,!..  i  \.  1^44  :  Report  of  the  O.  A.  Bt  L  p.  88s. 

*)    Ibid.  p.  2M)w.  V.x>r\  K.  Z.  1S4L  N.  16. 17.  W. 


CHAP.  V.    EVANG.  CIIUECII  TILL  1853.    §  457.  GUSTAVUS  AD0LPHU3  SOCC.    589 

mont  with  the  principles  of  tlie  Evangelical  Church,  the  request  was  at  once 
rejected.  (/)  Dr.  Rupp  was  sent  by  the  superior  association  of  Konigsberg  as 
its  deputy  to  the  assembly  at  Berlin  in  1846.  A  vote  being  taken  on  the  va- 
lidity of  his  credentials  on  the  night  of  September  7th,  a  smjdl  niiyority  ap- 
peared against  recognizing  him  as  a  member  of  the  assembly,  (m)  Although 
the  general  sentiment  was  averse  to  a  perversion  of  the  society  to  objects 
foreign  to  its  nature,  yet  the  ortliodox  party  demanded  his  exclnsion  us  an 
apostate,  and  they  were  joined  by  some  of  the  liberal  deputies.  This  was 
done  by  tlie  latter  either  because  they  wished  to  prevent  the  society  being 
made  an  authority  in  matters  of  faith,  and  therefore  allowed  the  Evangelical 
Church  to  be  postponed  for  the  Established  Church,  or  they  had  a  superior 
regard  for  the  success  of  the  society  which  seemed  of  special  imporLance  in 
that  particular  locality.  Immediately  wiis  heard  in  every  part  of  Protestant 
Germany  a  cry  of  extreme  disi)leasure  at  this  acticm,  and  an  immense  ma- 
jority appeared  in  the  local  societies  in  various  ways,  ofiering  protests  and 
asserting  that  the  decision  at  Berlin  was  based  upon  a  false  idea  of  the  Evan- 
gelical Church,  and  that  the  free  alliance  of  love  had  degenerated  into  an 
inqnisitorial  tribunal  {n)  On  the  other  hand,  the  other  party  tlireateued  to 
withdraw,  and  even  then  Gustavus  Adolphus  Societies  with  separate  ec<;lesi- 
astical  connections  had  been  formed  at  Koenigsburg  and  Berlin,  and  were 
readily  licensed  by  the  government,  but  never  exhibited  much  life,  (o)  The 
new  elections  threw  the  power  in  the  assembly  at  Darmstadt  (1847)  into  tlie 
hands  of  those  opposed  to  the  decision  at  Berlin ;  but  as  all  dreaded  the  im- 
piety of  a  schism,  )is  Rupp  had  withdrawn,  and  as  the  subsequent  course  of 
the  free  congregations  themselves  was  such  as  to  render  their  right  to  a  mem- 
bership in  the  Evangelical  Clmrch  very  doubtful,  the  parties  agreed  that  with- 
out reconsidering  the  decision  at  Berlin,  whenever  it  became  necessary  to 
act  npon  the  exclusion  of  a  deputy  for  his  want  of  a  membership  in  the 
Evangelical  Church,  the  decision  should  belong  to  the  superior  assembly  un- 
der such  regulations  as  would  give  no  room  for  temporary  passions  and  preju- 
dices, and  as  would  allow  the  true  m^ority  at  tlie  time  to  show  itself.  It 
was  resolved  that  no  deputy  from  a  society  unconnected  with  the  established 
churches  should  be  entitled  to  a  seat,  (p)  After  a  decline  in  consequence  of 
the  sway  of  tlie  political  spirit  of  1848,  the  interest  in  this  cause  annually 
increased  as  in  former  times  until  1853,  when  the  yearly  revenue  amounted 
to  $38,000.  Numerous  churches  have  been  erected,  those  which  were  decay- 
ing have  been  repaired,  and  those  outposts  of  Protestantism  which  seemed 
almost  lost  have  had  their  confidence  revived.    The  idea  of  an  Evangelical 


/)  Report  of  the  O.  A.  St  I.  p.  869»s. 

m)  Pnjtocoll  u.  d.  Sttznnsj  d.  5,  Ilanptvcrs.  Lps.  IS  10,  4.  Comp.  Brl.  KZ.  1846.  N.  74s.  76sw  J. 
Gffvl-^ti,  Berfcht  u.  die  zn  Rorlin  {reli.  llauptven.  Hanib.  1S46. 

fi)  Keport  <»f  the  0.  A.  1^6,  p.  29.'»s!«.  Brl.  KZ.  1*46.  N.  93.  95.  C.  ScAiairz,  Dr.  Rupp's  Auaschllesi. 
1£aI.  ISId.  TheiU^  Uiipp's  Au».scliIios.s.  Lp^  1$4(>.  Ritpi*.  d.  G.  A.  Vcrein  u.  d.  ev.  K.  Altonb.  1S47. 
Eltei-Ur  n.  Kraim^^  1st  d.  (J.  A.  Y.  cin  Landoskircbl.  o.  o.  er.  protc«tantl8chor ?  W.  DitUnbfrger^  &. 
d.  AuMchL  V.  R.  Hcidclb.  ISiT.  Fur  tho  decision :  C.  Lampe^  u.  d.  Auaaohl.  d.  Dr.  Rupp.  L|«.  1S46. 
Ukcke  a.  CUmann^  u.  d.  Nictitatinuluiie  il.  Konigab.  DepuUrt^n.  Ilainb.  1S47.  De  Wette^  d.  Au9(K:hL 
d.  Dr.  Rupp.  Lpa.  1<^*7.— KrLsIs  d.  G.  A.  Vereins.  Wecbaclreden.  v.  F.  Mallet  u.  IT.  JIuji/eld.  Hal. 
1M7.  coDip.  Reuter,  Rep.  1^7.  II.  6a. 

0)  £y.  K.  Z.  1347.  N.  6.  Brl  K.  Z.  1S17.  N.  9.  63.  63b.  75.       p)  Ibid.  N.  79. 


590  MODERN  CirURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  VL    A.  D.  1649-1858. 

Chvrch  Alliance  was  started  in  a  circle  of  friends  at  the  Sandhof  near  Frank- 
fort, but  the  association  itself  was  formed  by  persons  of  a  similar  spirit,  called 
together  by  a  public  appeal  in  the  Castle  church  of  Wittenberg  (Sept.  1848). 
Its  general  aim  was  to  constitute,  in  a  time  of  fearful  division,  a  firm  bulwark 
for  the  faith,  and  the  two  special  objects  which  it  had  in  view  have  been  well 
represented  in  the  persons  of  the  two  jurists  ton  Befhmann-ffoUtreg  and 
Stahl^  who  have  been  annually  but  regularly  elected  the  Presidents  of  its 
yearly  meetings.  One  of  these  was  to  satisfy  in  some  practicable  form  the 
desire  then  generally  felt  for  a  Gorman  National  Church,  and  the  other  was 
to  modify  the  Union,  for  which  the  new  Prussian  regulations  had  left  no  other 
distinction  than  the  permission  for  each  confession  to  follow  out  its  own  pecu- 
liar system  of  government,  until  it  should  become  a  mere  confederation,  (q) 
Hencx?,  in  the  original  charter,  the  Cliurch  Alliance  was  declared,  on  the  one 
hand,  not  to  be  a  union  in  wliich  the  confessional  churches  are  to  be  abol- 
ished, but  a  confederation  of  all  those  ecclesiastical  bodies  which  stood  on 
the  basis  of  the  reformed  confessions,  viz.,  the  Lutheran,  the  Reformed,  the 
United,  and  the  Moravian  Churches,  for  the  promotion  of  certain  common 
interests,  without  impairing  the  complete  independence  of  either  particular 
church ;  and  on  the  other,  to  have  no  actual  existence  until,  in  compliance 
with  the  request  of  a  committee  afterwards  to  be  chosen,  the  authorities  of 
the  rosi)ective  national  and  confessional  churches  should  send  deimties  whose 
special  business  it  should  be  to  form  the  true  Ecclesiastical  Council  of  the 
Evangelical  Church  (of  Germany).  StahPs  object  was  frustrated  by  the 
power  which  still  remained  in  the  Union,  and  that  of  B.  Hollwog  found  no 
support,  and  nothing  to  draw  men  together  during  the  j)olitical  revolutions 
then  tiking  place.  The  only  effects  of  their  efforts  were,  the  separation  of 
the  Prussian  supreme  ecclesiastical  council  into  its  different  confessions,  and 
the  meeting  of  the  Conference  at  Eisenach.  But  the  assemblies  annually 
convened  by  the  invitxition  of  the  permanent  committee  became,  like  the 
movable  assemblies  of  the  Gustavus  Adolphus  Society,  though  with  far  more 
comprehensive  objects  and  ecclesiastical  results,  great  pastoral  conferences,  to 
which  distinguished  preachers  were  invited  for  the  discussion  of  the  practical 
questions  of  the  day.  (r)  With  no  other  limitation  than  the  equivocal  con- 
dition that  all  should  stand  on  the  Reformed  Confessions,  here  were  collected 
for  free  co-operation  and  sympathy  those  two  parties  especially  which,  at  the 
Prussian  General  Synod,  and  with  respect  to  that  synod,  stood  in  such  hos- 
tile relations  to  each  other.  At  these  Bcclesiastieal  DieU  the  members  not 
only  poured  forth  the  warm  feelings  of  their  hearts  and  uttered  many  devo- 
tional sentiments  without  reference  to  each  other's  peculiarities,  but  many 
maxims  and  plans  of  Christian  wisdom  were  presented.  The  divided  state 
of  opinion  and  the  hesitation  apparent  in  it,  made  its  decisions  of  but  little 


q)  Dormer  Q.  Reform  d.  ev.  Landeskiroben  Im  Znsammenh.  mit  Hentell.  e.  ev.  deatsohra  K** 
tlonRlk.  Bonn.  1848. 

r)  Die  Vcrhandlungen  d.  Witt  Vereamml.  by  Kllng.  Brl.  1848.  Verb.  d.  2.  Witt  KTtgM.  R 
1JW9.  2  H.  Verb.  d.  8.  deatschen  KTagcs  za  Stnttg.  ed,  by  Lecbler,  B.  1860.  3  H.  Verli.  d-  4  KTi««i 
t\\  Elbcrffld,  e<l.  by  Krafft  B.  1851.  2  11.  Verb.  d.  6.  KT.  zu  Bremen,  ed.  by  Toel,  B.  laa  «  H. 
Verb.  d.  6.  KT.  za  Berlin,  ed.  by  Rendtorff,  B.  1858.— Entstehang  a.  bisher.  G«Beh.  d.  dentaebeD  «▼• 
KTage«L  Bil.  1858. 


CHAP.  V.    EVANO.  CUUECn  TILL  1658.    §  45T.  DOMESTIC  MISSIONS.        591 

avail,  but  they  were  generally  pnt  forth  against  the  unbelief  and  partial  faith 
of  the  times.  Propositions  of  an  extraordinary  character  \Vere  generally 
modified,  or  allowed  to  remain  as  rash  threats ;  (j»)  but  the  partial  reports 
which  particular  parties  sometimes  gave  of  the  proceedings  of  some  assembly, 
acting  without  duo  preparation  or  skill,  were  in  danger  of  conveying  state- 
ments or  hasty  representations  to  the  minds  of  evangelical  princes,  and  thus 
suspicions  might  be  thrown  upon  the  efforts  of  more  liberal  persons,  and  the 
natural  development  of  their  plans  might  be  disturbed.  The  propositions  of 
a  committee  at  the  Ecclesiastical  Diet  at  Berlin,  to  leave  undisturbed  the  pe- 
culiar confession  of  each  church,  but  to  acknowledge  the  Augsburg  Confes- 
sion of  1680  as  the  common  record  of  evangelical  doctrine  in  Germany 
(according  to  the  programme,  as  the  fundamental  creed  of  the  whole  Evan- 
gelical Church  of  Germany),  was  almost  unanimously  adopted,  and  every 
attempt  to  modify  or  explain  it  was  repelled  in  a  dictatorial  manner.  From 
the  first  every  invitation  to  co-operate  in  this  movement  had  been  declined 
by  the  separatist  Lutheran  Church.  A  few  Lutheran  doctors  of  Erlangen, 
Leipsic,  and  Rostock,  gave  their  testimony  against  the  resolution  of  the  Assem- 
bly at  Berlin,  on  the  ground  that  it  was  a  deceptive  act^  and  injurious,  not 
only  to  the  Lutheran  Church  which  claimed  the  Augsburg  Confession  as  its 
exclusive  property,  but  to  the  Confession  itself,  and  that  it  obliterated  all 
those  distinctions  which  God  had  placed  between  truth  and  error,  (t)  The 
ecclesiastical  diet,  from  its  first  organization,  was  principally  engaged  in  plans 
for  domestic  missions  to  relieve  the  spiritual  and  temporal  necessities  of  evan- 
gelical people  by  means  of  evangelical  instruction  and  fraternal  supplies.  The 
Church  had  indeed  always  been  an  institution  for  affording  such  relief,  but 
the  doctrine  of  the  merit  of  works  had  made  the  Catholic  far  more  efficient 
in  such  matters  than  the  Evangelical  Church,  and  the  practical  activity  of 
the  Reformed  had  always  exceeded  that  of  the  Lutheran  body.  "With  the 
increase  of  life  in  the  Church,  Christian  love  manifested  itself  also  more  ener- 
getically in  those  various  associations  which  had  been  devised  against  the 
miseries  of  social  life,  and  entered  with  more  or  less  earnestness  into  mea- 
sures for  the  spiritual  welfare  of  all  who  wore  alienated  from  God.  (m)  Wp- 
chern,  a  licentiate,  and  the  superintendent  of  the  Rough  Uouse  near  Ham- 
burg, for  the  rescue  of  neglected  children  (after  1833),  succeeded  by  enthusi- 
astic speeches  and  writings  in  making  the  cause  of  Domestic  Missions  a 
popular  object  even  in  circles  of  fashion,  and  the  hesitation  of  the  Luther- 
ans on  the  ground  that  it  might  be  an  interference  with  the  clerical  office, 
through  the  unrestrained  activity  of  associations,  and  that  it  was  a  develop- 
ment of  the  doctrine  of  the  universal  priesthood,  has  been  insufficient  to 
check  its  progress.(r)  The  centralization  of  the  quiet  but  complicated  action  of 

«)  Ev.  KZ.  1852.  p.  904. 

/)  DaA  B<>kenntnbs  dcr  lutb.  K.  gegen  d.  Bek.  d.  B^rl  KTagA  gewahrt  von  etilchon  Lehrcrn  d. 
Th.  11.  d.  KUechtsL  ErL  1S5S.  Coinp.  W.  F.  Bi9Htr,  Union  u.  Confoed.  (Zvltsch.  f.  lutli.  Tb.  1S49. 
1L2) 

u)  Diac-nnUsen-Anstalt  za  KaiserswGrth.  (.V.  KZ.  1S39.  N.  135. 1310.  N.  41.)  Die  bannb.  Schwest- 
ern  d.  ev.  K.  (Deut'^he  Vicite\jabn»cb.  1842.  N.  19.) 

c)  lilc  fltegenden  Blatter  defl  rauben  IIaii»e!S  Ilaiub.  &  ISIS.  Die  innero  Mission  d.  deutscben  ev. 
K.  Denkachr.  an  d.  dt  NaUon.  Hamb.  1849. 


592  MODEEN  CnURClI  UI8T0BT.    PER.  VL    A.  D.  1613-1858. 

the  local  associations  which  soino  havo  attempted,  will,  perhaps,  only  give 
greater  importance  to  the  whole  by  the  increase  of  counsel,  and  by  the  pro- 
posed education  of  well  qualified  laborers ;  (if)  and  the  ecclesiastical  diet, 
while  it  serves  to  inflame  the  hearts  of  men  to  afford  on  ample  supply  for 
the  abyss  of  neglected  wretchedness  which  it  discloses,  will  make  the  Church 
Alliance  a  voluntary  aUiance  of  faith  working  by  love.  The  progress  of  Catho- 
licism in  England  produced  such  a  spirit  of  co-operation  among  the  Protes- 
tants of  that  country,  that  many  were  prepared  for  a  plan  of  union  embracing 
all  truly  evangelical  communities.  After  a  preliminary  meeting  at  Liver[jool 
(1845),  and  after  much  discussion  of  various  propositions  at  an  assembly  in 
Loudon  (184G),  an  Ecangelical  Alliance  visa  formed  with  groat  rejoicings,  in 
which,  on  the  basis  of  nine  articles  as  a  common  platform  of  faitli,  any  per- 
sons in  their  individual  capacity,  and  without  interfering  with  their  ecclesias*- 
tical  diflbrences,  might  extend  to  each  other  as  Evangelical  Christians  the 
hand  of  fellowship.  Even  CJermans  took  part  in  these  proceedings,  and 
Northern  and  Southern  CJcrmany  were  marked  out  for  auxiliary  societies. 
But  such  was  the  nature  of  the  articles  that  no  union  based  upon  them  could 
be  of  much  importauce  except  for  Groat  Britain  and  North  America,  to  re- 
mind the  numerous  s:cts  of  tliose  countries,  who  are  divided  by  certain  rigid 
literalities,  but  are  united  in  the  many  fundamental  doctrines  of  primitive  or- 
thodoxy, of  their  higher  unity,  (x) 

§  458.     The  Scriptures.     Contfrom  §  879,  411. 

Dr  Wettif,  Elnl.  in  das  A.  u.  N.  Te<  (|>.  N"V>.)  [Int  1«»  the  O.  T.  transl.  fhrni  the  Oenn.  of  De 
Wett^,  with  copious  ailcL  by  TIkhmI.  Parker.  B<>»t.  1S43.  2  vols.]  In  <J.  N.  T.  \>y  Credner^  H«L  ISSta. 
by  Xfutiecter^  Li>s.  1S40.  liftnut,  (k*sch.  <1.  II.  Scbrift.  (p.  44C.)  [Some  notices  may  also  befoDnU  ia 
7'.  II.  Homes  ic  Davidmn'H  Intrcxliictions.] 

The  peculiar  nature  of  Protestantism  was  exhibited  in  the  fact  that  all 
parties,  in  i)roportion  as  they  had  a  living  connection  with  the  Church,  met 
on  the  common  ground  of  tlie  Scriptures.  Although  these  had  lost  some- 
thing of  the  venerable  majesty  they  onc«  possessed  as  a  holy  book,  modem 
Protestantism  made  it  easier  to  investigate  them  f\&  original  documents.  With 
respect  to  the  New  Testament,  Griesbach  (1745-1812)  examined  all  the  libra- 
ries of  Europe,  and  laid  down  the  principles  for  ascertaining  the  most  proba- 
ble reading  by  a  careful  weighing  of  testimony  and  a  preference  of  the  older 
Alexandrian  manuscripts,  {a)  Lachmann  (d.  1851),  without  regard  to  the 
sense  of  the  passages,  merely  sought  for  the  most  ancient  reading,  (&)  and 
Tiachendorf  recovQred  manuscripts  which  had  been  lost,  and  restored  otherB 
which  had  been  defaced,  (c)    In  the  historical  investigations  for  determiniog 

ir)  Entatth.  n.  Gosch.  <L  KTaffS.  p.  548L  BrL  KZ.  1852.  N.  17. 

ar)  E-ssays  on  CJir.  Union,  K.linb.  IS  15.  Br).  KZ.  lS4rt.  N.  4l8S.  45.  50.  68*  71.  74  81.  S7.  S9.  1347. 
N.  11.  84.  ('.  Jiitnn  &.  TA.  PlitU  d.  ev.  Bund.  Baa.  1S47.  E.  Boefimer.  d.  ev.  Bundoatag  in  LnodoB. 
1851.  (l)euU.>tio  Zeibch.  f.  clir.  W.  1S51.  X.  4ds  )  Journals  of  the  Alliance:  £vani;elical  CbriatcA- 
dom,  «b  Bulletin  du  Monde  chrvticn. 

a)  J.  C.  ir  Auffuttti,  u.  Grlesb.  Venlieaate.  Bresl.  1S12. 

b)  N.  T.  Brl.  ls31.  Stud.  u.  Krit  1S:)0.  il.  U  1S32.  H.  4.  N.  Test  gr.  et  lat  C.  Laehmuuuk^no. 
Phil.  BuitmannuH^  ^r.  lect  auctoritates  a])poi»ait,  Ber.  1842-50.  3  Tola. 

c)  Gtd.  Epbraeini  rescr.  Lpa.  1848-5.  2  vols.  4    Monuoini.  sacra  N.  T.  I^iSw  lSi6b  4. 


CHAP.  V.    KVANO.  CnURCII  TILL  1S58.    $  46S.  WINKK.    LUCKE.  593 

the  genuineness  of  the  writings  of  tho  Old  Testament,  especially  of  those 
which  bore  the  names  of  Mjses  and  Daniel,  then  generally  regarded  as  the 
work  of  later  authors,  every  effort  was  made  by  the  newly  awakened  ortho- 
doxy to  prove  that  they  were  composed  by  those  whose  names  they  bore,  (d) 
Besides  those  books  of  the  New  Testament  which  had  been  subject  to  some 
suspicion  in  ancient  times,  the  first  gospel  lost  the  name  of  Matthew,  (e)  the 
pastoral  epistles  were  called  in  question,  (f)  some  painful  but  easily  re- 
tracted doubts  were  raised  respecting  the  gospel  of  Jolin,  which  had  been  so 
highly  extolled  for  its  theology  of  feeling,  (g)  Xo  sooner  was  the  interpreta- 
tion of  the  Scriptures  released  from  the  service  of  Orthodoxy  than  it  was 
taken  up  by  the  party  of  the  Enlightenment.  The  ultimate  result^*  of  their 
efforts  may  bo  seen  in  the  ethical  expositions  required  by  Kant,  and  the 
rationalistic  explanation  of  the  miraculous  history.  Wlicn  science  itself  suc- 
ceeded in  overcoming  this  feeble  effort,  the  object  of  all  true  interpretation 
was  generally  acknowledged  to  be  a  faithful  representation  of  the  literal 
sense  intended  by  the  sacred  authors.  Wirier  (b.  1789)  made  use  of  the  de- 
velopment given  to  classical  philology  for  determining  the  idioms  of  the  New 
Testament,  that  he  might  terminate  all  uncertainty  about  the  meaning  of 
particular  words  by  the  highest  degree  of  grammatical  accuracy,  (h)  Liicke 
(b.  1791)  was  the  first  who,  in  the  spirit  of  tho  recent  free  investigation,  re- 
ferred once  more  to  the  religious  element  as  it  may  bo  learned  through  the 
sympathy  which  tlie  interpreter  shouM  feel  with  primitive  antiquity,  and  as 
it  is  indicated  by  ecclesiastical  tradition,  (i)  and  enriched  by  a  strong  predilec- 
tion for  the  explanation  given  by  the  ecclesiastical  fathers  and  reformers. 
The  Hegelian  school  insisted  that  it  was  the  highest  duty  of  an  interpreter  to 
bring  out  the  ideas  which  lie  unconsciously  at  the  basis  of  the  biblical  repre- 
sentations and  figures,  (l)  This  practice  was  afterwards  accommodated  to 
the  heterodox  method  of  mythical  interpretation  which,  so  far  as  relates  to 
the  application  of  antiquities  to  the  primeval  history  of  the  Old  Testament, 
was  for  a  long  time  in  vogue,  and  mot  with  almost  universal  opposition  when 
it  substituted  an  ideal  general  truth  for  the  original  facts  of  the  Christian 
historj'.  (I)  Two  parties  were  at  last  arrayed  in  direct  of)i)osition  to  each 
other ;  the  one  regarded  the  Scriptures  entirely  as  the  work  of  man,  and  tho 
other  looked  ui>on  them  as  a  direct  revelation  from  God.  The  new  Tubingen 
$ehooIj  particularly,  lias  endeavored  to  show  that  the  writings  of  the  New  Tes- 


ff)  Iffng^tenherg,  BeUrr.  %.  Einl.  in  d.  A.  T.  BrI.  IS^l-^O.  8  v.  [Tlip  8  first  T0I5,  of  Contributions 
on  Zcoh.  «h  Don.  and  on  Pentateuch,  trans,  by  liyland^  Jc  publ.  in  Clarke's  For.  &  TheoL  Lib.  Edinb. 
1^17.  3  V.  S.] 

e)  S!*'f>fi.  u.  (1.  T'rspr.  d.  er.«ten  kan.  Kv.  Kocni^'sb.  ISC'i. 

/)  $  440.  nt  <f.    /!  C.  Baur,  <lIo  sojjcn.  Pastoralbr.  Stuttfr.  1S85. 

g)  JirfUdtneiiUr^  Probabilia  do  Kv.  et  Ei»p.  Jo.  indole  et  orip.  Lps.  1S20. 

/i)  GraiDinalik  d.  neiitest  S|>raclii<ll«im:i.  Li».  1822.  5  cd.  1S44.  [(irani.  of  tho  Idioms  <tf  the  Or. 
I^ij;,  of  the  X.  T.  from  the  Germ,  of  G.  IJ.  Winer,  by  ,/.  If.  Agn^w  &  O.  G.  Khbfke^  Plillad.  lS40.a] 

i)  GrundriM  d.  nnutcst  Hormcncutlk.  Gott  1S17.  Brl.  tlieol.  Zeit^ch.  1^22.  IL  8.  More  ftilly  In 
his  CiimiiK-ntar  u.  d.  Schrr.  d.  Job.  Mnce  I'^'ZU.  [Zuc-X'tf  on  the  Kpp.  of  John  is  trmnsL  &  pubL  In 
ClArk*s  Bibl.  Cab.  Edlnb.  ls4C  ] 

k)  Billroth,  Conini.  lu  don  Brr.  an  d.  Cor,  Ljjs.  1S83.  [Billroth  on  tho  Epi».  to  the  Cor.  is  tnuisL 
k  pabL  in  Clnrk^a  Bib.  Cab.  E<1  18:38.]    BrL  Jahrbb.  183S.  N.  03. 

/)  K.  ITa*^,  Leben  Jesu.  §  22.  nt  a. 

88 


594  MODERN  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  VL    A.  D.  lMa-186a 

lament  were  the  result  of  a  series  of  conflicts  and  attempts  at  compromise  be- 
tween the  Jewish  Christianity  of  Peter  and  the  Gentile  Christianity  of  Paul. 
Certain  points  of  development  following  each  other  at  regular  periods,  are 
supposed  by  these  writers  to  be  discoverable  in  the  doctrinal  contents  of  the 
sacred  writings,  and  principally  on  the  basis  of  these  the  Revelation  of  John, 
and  the  four  great  epistles  of  Paul,  are  alone  regarded  as  genuine  monaments 
of  the  Apostolic  Church,  and  the  first  gospel  is  looked  upon  as  a  collection  of 
apostolic  traditions  made  very  near  the  same  period.    The  original  Gospel  of 
Luke  they  endeavored  to  find  in  that  of  Marcion,  though  in  this  they  have 
been  corrected  by  their  own  disciples,  and  in  the  fourth  gospel  they  have  dis- 
covered a  dogmatic  and  figurative  composition  formed  from  materials  sup- 
plied by  the  synoptic  gospels,  to  reconcile  all  ecclesiastical  parties  in  the  second 
century,  during  the  latter  part  of  which  the  notion  of  the  Logos  was  applied 
to  that  of  Christ,  and  so  attained  ascendency  in  the  Church  for  all  subsequent 
ages,  (m)    We  have  at  last  a  criticism  from  this  school  which  seems  to  have 
originated  more  in  a  love  of  offence  than  of  truth,  for  even  the  four  epistles 
of  Paul  are  tlirown  by  it  into  the  general  abyss,  {n)    On  the  other  hand,  the 
new  orthodox  school  professed  to  take  a  higher  view  of  the  whole  sacred  his- 
tory ;  it  was  convinced  of  the  genuineness  of  aU  the  books  of  the  Bible ;  it 
found  in  every  part  of  them  not  only  divine  truth  but  the  Lutheran  theology, 
and  the  only  danger  was  that  the  theosophic  fancies  in  which  many  indulged 
might  carry  them  beyond  even  this.    In  their  fondness  for  the  supernatural 
they  delighted  in  extending  the  work  of  God's  Spirit,  and  of  redemption,  to 
material  things ;   and  while  they  conceded  that  the  account  of  creation  is 
perhaps  poetical,  and  addressed  to  the  outward  vision,  they  not  only  regard 
it  as  a  veritable  history,  but  have  discovered  that  before  the  day  of  creation, 
and  before  the  fall  of  the  angels,  the  earth  was  the  habitation  of  Satan  and 
his  angels,  (o)    Their  views  of  general  history  are  occasionally  full  of  interest, 
and  exhibit  some  traces  of  the  Hegelian  philosopliy,  for  the  whole  history  of 
man  is  represented  as  a  gradual  revelation  of  Christ.    But  on  an  intermediate 
ground  between  these  schools,  some  men,  and  e$i)ecially  some  learned  divineb 
have  arisen,  and  have  long  been  tolerated  among  the  faithful  by  the  Evangel- 
ical Church  Journal,  w^ho  make  a  distinction  between  what  is  divine  and 
what  is  human  in  the  Scriptures,  and  have  sought  reconciliation  with  the 
natural  science  of  modern  times,  not  merely  by  ironical  compromises,  but  by 
limiting  divine  inspiration  to  that  which  is  strictly  religious,  and  even  de- 
scribing it  as  nothing  more  than  a  remarkable  tact  in  religious  matters,  (p) 
Although  they  feel  bound  by  their  own  religious  consciousness  to  regard  the 
Scriptures  as  a  divine  revelation,  they  endeavor  to  treat  every  one  as  an  evan- 


m)  F.  C.  Btiur,  d.  Chrlstenth.  d.  8  ersten  Jahrhh.  T&b.  185a  Earlier  points  p*.  24.  Comp.  Tb«oL 
Jahrbb.  ISM.  H.  3.  p.  294ss. 

fi)  B  Biiur^  Kritlk  d.  paul.  Briefe.  Brl.  1850s.  8  H. 

o)  Thi^i  Mr'h  (p.  2i.)—R.  Stier,  Andeatt  f  RlSub.  Schriftveretfindn.  Kftnlgsh.  Lps.  ISdiaa.  i  toU- 
F.  Dri;t-ft,  A,  Ge5ch.  d,  proph.  Th.  s.  Croslus.  Lpflc  IMS.  J.  C.  IT.  ITofmann :  Wrlwa^  n.  EifiUl. 
Kordl.  1S41-4.  2  vols.  Scbrlflbeweis.  Ibid.  1852.  voL  I.  J.  II.  Kurtz,  Geach.  d.  alien  Bundsa  BrLl 
ed.  1853.  2  vol». 

/>)  T/ioluck :  Komm.  0.  fL  B.  an  d.  Ilebr.  Hmb.  183a  p^  83ss.  Dentsoba  Zeltaoh.  t  obr.  Wlft 
1850.  N.  16ea.  42a8. 


CUAP.  y.    EVANG.  CHUBCn  TILL  1858.    $  4S».  CALVINISll    M0MIEB8.         595 

gelical  companion  in  the  faith  who  truly  believes,  even  if  he  does  not  believe 
correctly  in  the  authority  of  the  Scriptures,  and  in  justification  by  faith  in 
Christ  Iq) 

§  459.     Cahinism  as  a  Sect 

Sebickedans,  <L  K.  v.  Genf  im  19.  Jalirh.  (Arcliiv  f.  KG.  vol  V.  St  1.)  J.  S.  ChmevUfey  Precis 
det  debaU  theol.  qui  depnis  quelqucs  annecs  out  agltC'S  la  villc  de  G6n<'.ve.  Gen.  1824.  A.  Bo«t^  D6- 
fense  dw  FIdcles  de  IVgl.  do  G6n.,  qui  sc  sont  constltuos  en  iSgl.  indt'pendant  Par.  1S25.  Hl«t  verita- 
ble d«8  Moniiera.  Par.  1824.  2  vols.  Ba%  1S'2A  2  IT.  Mtilan.  le  proems  da  mdthodlsme  da  Gun.  G6n. 
1885k  Gen&  kirchl.  ZuRtande.  (D«ntsche  Zeiftch.  f.  cbr.  Wtss.  1S50.  N.  Slss.)  Also  Beinerkk.  by  L. 
Tkomns.  (Ihi^  \85\.  y,  n.)  Die  frnhern  rel.  Zut(tande  d.  Waadtl.  (R«uter,  Rep.  1847.  H.  2s.)— 7! 
Ftiedner^  ColIectenreiM  n.  Ilollanil.  Essoii.  1S:31.  2  v«»l8.  AuquhU^  Botr.  (L  d.  Zust  d.  K.  n.  Tlieol.  d. 
NIederi.  (Bcttrr.  z.  Gesch.  n.  Statist,  d.  eir.  K.  Lpa.  1897.  voL  II.)  Die  Unruhen  in  d.  niederl.  ret.  K. 
188a-89.  By  X.  edit  by  Gieseler.  Ilamb.  1S40.  comp.  Acta  hist  eco.  1886.  p.  5618a.  Ev.  K.  Z.  1888. 
N.  88hi    [K.  R.  Hagmbach,  (p.  416.)  Vorles.  19.  Th.  2.] 

Even  in  the  time  of  Rousseau  the  ministers  of  the  Church  in  Geneva 
shrank  from  answering  the  question  whether  Christ  was  God.  The  venerable 
Society  of  Pastors  enacted  a  law  (1817),  by  which  it  was  announced  that 
every  minister  would  be  required  at  his  installation  to  promise  that  he  wonld 
abstain  from  the  discussion  of  certain  principal  points  of  Calvinistic  ortho- 
doxy. After  1813,  however,  some  persons  zealous  for  orthodoxy  became  ex- 
cited, and  were  strengthened  by  the  influence  of  Mad.  de  Krudener  (1766- 
1824).  The  attention  of  thi^  lady  was  now  turned  from  palaces  to  cottages, 
that  she  might  preach  repentance  in  the  wilderness  of  civilization,  and  col- 
lect and  establish  out  of  all  churches  a  kingdom  for  the  Lion  of  Judah.  (a) 
This  class  of  persons  became  numerous  in  the  Pays  de  Vaud,  and  under  the 
direction  of  some  suspended  ministers  many  Separatist  congregations  were 
formed,  with  various  individual  peculiarities.  According  to  a  popular  witti- 
dsm  they  were  called  MomierSy  but  a  more  respectable  appellation  was  that 
of  Methodists.  The  people,  who  were  reproved  by  them  even  for  innocent 
mirth  and  harmless  usages,  not  unfrcquently  rose  upon  them  in  acts  of  vio- 
lence, and  the  leaders  of  the  new  church  were  punished  by  the  government 
with  imprisonment  and  exile.  Under  the  feeling  that  they  were  thereby  imi- 
tating the  primitive  Christians,  they  endured  these  persecutions  with  much 
conrage.  After  the  Re  volution  of  1830  the  conviction  became  nearly  univer- 
sal that  it  was  unbecoming  for  a  free  people  to  persecute  men  for  any  reli- 
gious creed  whatever.  An  Evangelical  Society  for  the  restoration  of  Calvin- 
ism after  a  Scriptural  model  was  then  formed  (1831),  by  which  a  theological 
seminary  has  been  established  (1832)  for  orthodox  students,  (b)  But  although 
the  Church  of  Cleneva  had  been  accused  by  the  Momiers  of  apostasy  from  it- 
self, the  jubilee  of  the  Reformation  was  triumphantly  celebrated  there,  (c) 
and  the  Grand  Council  of  the  Canton  of  Vaud,  after  a  protracted  debate, 
tore  in  pieces  the  Helvetic  Confession  (1839)  because  it  was  the  standard  of 


q)  CdnrerMtloo  saloons :  Stadien  u.  Krit  cd.  by  Umbreit  A  Ullmann  since  1828.  Deutsche 
Zeltach.  f  chr.  Wiso.  a.  chr.  Lcben  since  1850.  Coup.  O,  F.  KrauM,  die  sogen.nenere  Tbeol.  (TbeoL 
4ahrbb.  1658.  H.  2.) 

a)  {//urUr,)  Fran  ▼.  Krndcner  in  d.  Scbweiz.  ITelvet  1817.    Zeitgenoasen.  Lpa.  181&  vol.  TIL 

t)  A.  K.  Z.  1831.  N.  92. 1838.  N.  59.  Ev.  K.  Z.  188L  N.  84  1832.  N.  54.  Deatache  Zeitsch.  t  cbr. 
W.  1S50.  N.  50. 

e)  Jubil«  de  la  Bet  de  Gdo^Tei  Qin.  1885.  8  to1&    AeU  biat  ecc  1885.  p.  448at. 


596  MODERN  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  YL    A.  D.  164S-1858. 

the  Momiers.  (d)    The  Revolution  of  1846  overthrew  the  Calvinistic  aristo- 
cracy of  the  pastors,  and  a  Consistory,  elected  by  the  congregation,  and  with 
a  majority  from  the  congregation,  was  placed  at  the  head  of  the  National 
Church,  (r)      The   various  congregations  of   dissenters  formed  themselves 
(1848)  into  an  Evangelical  Church,  whose  wants  have  been  supplied,  and 
whose  pious  eiforts  have  been  sustained  with  a  generous  liberality  from  Eng- 
land, in  a  noble  rivalry  witli  the  Established  Church.  (/) — The  Church  of  the 
Netherlands  was  completely  re-organized  during  the  occupation  of  the  coun- 
try by  the  French.    By  the  fundamental  law  of  1816  the  synodal  form  of 
government  was  renewed  and  concentrated,  but  the  old  church  discipline  was 
abolished,  and  the  influence  of  the  state  retained.    The  disposition  of  the 
people  was  favorable  to  a  merely  practical  Christianity,  and  the  educated 
clergy  were  partial  to  a  Scriptural  supernaturalism,  which  now  retained  no 
repugnance  to  the  Remonstrant^j.     In  cousc'iucnce  of  the  poetic  interests  in 
the  Netherlands  of  former  times,  created  by  the  poet  Bilderdyk,  many  began 
to  long  after  the  orthodoxy  of  tliosc  times,  and  two  Israelites  who  had  been 
converted  by  him,  displayed  much  zeal  in  opposition  to  the  constitution,  to 
vaccination  and  the  Remonstrants  (1823).     Gradually  a  party  was  formed 
which  demanded  that  every  thing  should  be  restored  to  the  condition  re- 
quired by  the  constitution  and  tlio  creed  of  the  Synod  of  Dort.    The  leader 
of  this  party,  a  young  minister  whose  name  was  De  Cock,  was  at  first  sus- 
pended by  the  ecclesiastical  authorities  because  he  would  not  refrain  from 
interfering  in  the  spiritual  atfairs  of  the  parislies  of  others,  and  for  calling  his 
niinisterial  bretliren    wolves,  and  the  hyums  which  had  (since  1807)  sup- 
planted the  Psalms  the  songs  of  SireiLs,  and  was  finally  deposed  (1834).    A 
portion  of  his  congregation  forthwitli   declared  themselves  separated  with 
him  from  an  Established  Church  in  which  they  believed  so  many  heresies  were 
mingled,  and  in  a  short  time  their  number  was  increased  by  the  accession  of 
four  ministers  and  four  thousand  people.    Even  in  the  Established  Church 
many  were  alarmed  at  an  open  rupture  with  the  decrees  of  the  Synod  of 
Dort,  but  the  General  Synod  refused  to  explain  the  legal  oath  respecting  the 
public  confessions  of  faith  in  such  a  way  as  to  take  from  each  one  the  right 
of  judging  for  himself  whether  they  were  conformed  to  the  Scriptures  or  not 
(1835).    The  Separatists  were  fined  and  imprisoned  by  the  civil  courts  as  dis- 
turbers of  public  worship,  and  for  violating  the  law  which  forbade  more  thai 
twenty  persons  to  assemble  without  permission  from  the  authorities.    They 
at  first  claimed  protection  on  the  ground  that  they  were  the  old  orthodox 
church,  and  not  a  new  sect,  but  they  finally  presented  their  statutes  to  the 
king,  together  with  a  renunciation  of  their  claim  upon  the  property  of  the 
Church,  and  obtained  the  royal  permission  to  form  themselves  into  separate 
Christian  congregations  (1839).    The  Synod  of  the  National  Church,  which 
met  in  1850,  in  view  of  the  numerous  changes  which  had  been  made  in  the 
fundamental  law  of  the  state,  formed  an  independent  synodal  system,  ic- 


d)  Ev.  K.  Z.  1839.  N.  26.  1S40.  N.  9. 

e)  Rapport  da  Cuzulst  d.  TcgL  nationale  de  Ocn.  1349.    R^glement  organlqne  poor  V6gl  nit  O^Q^ 
1849. 

/)  EgL  dvug.  k  Q^n.  1848.    AB8embl6e  gin.  do  U  Boo.  ^y.  G6d.  1S49. 


CHAP.  V.    EVANG.  CHURCH  TILL  1858.    §460.  CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.       597 

cording  to  which  the  general  affairs  of  the  Ohnrch  were  to  be  niannged  by 
the  Greneral  Synod,  which  met  annually  at  the  Hague,  and  consisted  of  dele- 
gates from  the  ten  provincial  synods,  and  from  the  three  theological  facul- 
ties, and  by  a  commission  chosen  by  the  General  Synod  to  act  in  its  name 
dnring  the  intervals  between  its  meetings.  (<7) 

§  460.     Dicmon  of  the  Church  in  Scotland  and  in  the  Pays  de  Vaiid. 

A.  F.  Gemb^rg,  A.  ftcbutt  Nationalkirohe.  Haiiib.  1S2S.  K.  U,  SucA',  d.  K.  v.  Schotttand.  Heidib. 
1S44.  2  voU  B.  W.  Xofi,  Case  of  the  Free  Clmrcli  nf  ScDtlarid.  T»nd,  1844.  8.  Ad.  Siid<rtP,  tl. 
schott  Kinrhenfraffe.  PoLs«l  1315.  J.  A'oHUfn,  d.  scbott  K.  Hainb.  18.*i2  —With  respect  to  the  r»ublic 
BCtd  of  the  Ctmncll  of  State,  and  the  comment!)  of  the  Pres.  Drufy :  AIl:r.  Z.  Monatsbl.  Febr.  1S46.  Dor 
waadtL  KStreit  by  X.  (Schweglora  Jahrb.  d.  Gegi'nw.  Febr.  1946,)— Proci:*  d(«  fails  qui  ont  amcne  ot 
Baivi  la  dtSmiiMUtn  du  la  majoritt^  dos  pastenrs  v.t  ndnisirci*  de  I'^l.  du  canton  de  Vand.  Accomf>.  dvn 
dociim.  oflTic.  recufll  par  Ch.  Riup.  Latis.  1846.  Alw  on  this  subject:  Leopold  in  ZSeitAchr.  f.  hl>L  Tl*. 
1S46.  II.  4.  1847.  H.  1.  S.—AL  Schwf.izet\  d.  kirchl.  Zi-rwarfnisso  Iin  Kanton  Wa.idt  Zur.  1846.  E.  F, 
Gdpk^.  d.  kircbi.  Iiewe<;.  Im  K.  Waa<lt.  (Zeitsch.  f.  hist.  Th.  1S5(».  H.  S.)  {Ifeth^rington^  Hist,  of  tlie 
Chb.  <»f  Scot.  Edinb.  1S48.  New  York.  1844.  p.  3Ga«.  Ifajina,  Life  of  T.  Chalmers.  New  York.  1650- 
«.  4  V,     W.  L.  Alerander,  Notes  of  a  Tour  &  Notices  of  the  Rel  IJodica  of  Switz.  Olaag.  1S46.  8.] 

The  Church  of  Scotland  always  felt  a  peculiar  jealousy  in  behalf  of  its 
independence  in  all  spiritual  matters.  The  right  of  patronage  was  therefore 
abolished  in  the  fundamental  law  of  IGDO  (revoluti(m  settlement.)  When 
this,  however,  was  restored  by  secular  violence  (1712),  the  protests  of  the 
Church  were  generally  quieted  by  those  (Moderates)  who  found  their  own 
comfort  promoted  by  the  existing  state  of  things.  But  when  the  religious 
life  of  the  Church  was  revived,  and  the  puritanic  element  became  powerful, 
the  whole  energy  of  the  party  then  formed  (evangelical  party)  was  concen- 
trated in  the  etfort  to  destroy  the  power  of  patrons  to  impose  upon  congrega* 
tions  ministers  who  wore  not  acceptable  to  the  people.  In  1834  the  General 
Assembly  conceded  to  each  congregation  the  right  to  reject  such  ministers 
(veto  act).  When,  however,  the  royal  courts  took  under  their  protection  the 
rights  of  the  patrons,  and  in  consequence  of  the  resistance  made  by  the  Gen- 
eral Assembly,  interfered  in  various  ways  in  the  sjiiritual  affairs  of  the  Church, 
and  finally,  when  redress  had  been  sought  in  vain  from  the  imperial  parlia- 
mentv,  on  the  opening  of  the  General  Assembly,  May  18,  1848,  the  friends  of 
ecclesiastical  freedom  (Nonintrusionists),  including  a  large  and  the  most  influ- 
ential portion  of  the  clergy,  with  the  noble-minded  Dr.  Chalmers  (d.  1847) 
at  their  head,  separated  themselves  by  a  solemn  protest  from  the  Established 
Church,  on  the  ground  that  violence  had  been  done  to  their  consciences,  and 
dishonor  had  been  inflicted  upon  the  crown  of  Christ  by  the  civil  power.  All 
their  churches  and  revenues  wore  abandoned  by  these  seceders  with  no  other 
hope  than  their  reliance  upon  the  free-will  ofl:erings  of  the  Scottish  people. 
As  on  the  one  hand  some  proprietors  refused  to  sell  the  necessary  ground  and 
materials  for  building  now  churches,  so  particular  congregations,  on  the  other, 
attempted  by  violence  to  exclude  from  their  churches  those  mini.«*ters  who 
were  obtruded  upon  them  by  patronage.  Millions  of  pounds,  however,  amply 


g)  A.  KZ.  1851.  N.  808.    Comp.  Ibid.  1858.  N.  16.  Brl.  KZ.  ISSa.  N.  9.     UUmann,  t.  CharakterL^u 
tlk  d.  hull.  Th.  (Stud.  a.  Krit  1844.  IL  8.) 


598  MODERN  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  YL    A.  D.  1648-18S& 

sufficient  for  all  the  ecclesiastical  wants  of  the  people,  were  oontribnted,  (a) 
and  with  the  utmost  worldly  prudence,  as  well  as  the  most  earnest  piety,  the 
Free  Presbyterian  Church  was  founded,  and  became  the  real  National  Church 
of  Scotland. — In  the  Canton  of  FtfM</ the  spirit  of  the  methodistic  piety  bo 
far  penetrate<l  even  the  Rstablished  Church,  that  sometimes  when  its  minis- 
ters had  performed  the  duties  of  public  worship  many  would  hold  devotional 
a'^omblies  in  the  evening  (oratoires),  which  were  attended  especially  by  the 
higher  classes.    In  direct  contrariety  to  the  traditional  doctrine  inculcated 
ft-ora  Berne,  that  the  Cliurch  was  strictly  dependent  upon  the  state,  the  idea 
that  the  Church  was  absolutely  independent  of  the  state  was  diffused  among 
the  clergy,  more  especially  by  the  labors  of  Vinet.  (ft)    After  the  overthrow 
of  the  comparatively  aristocratic  government  (1845)  the  provisional  regency 
of  the  sovereign  people  prohibited  the  clergy  of  the  Established  Church  from 
attending  the  oratories  which  had  been  already  threatened  by  the  populace, 
and  some  clergymen  who  dl^beyed  were  suspended.    When  the  new  demo- 
cratic constitution  was  about  to  be  submitted  to  a  vote  of  the  people,  the 
government,  wishing  to  recommend  it  by  proclamation,  sent  it  to  the  clergy 
to  be  read  from  their  pulpits.     Abotit  forty  clergymen  refused  to  comply  with 
this  request,  and  in  justification  of  their  act  ap])ealed  to  a  law  which  ap- 
peared to  give  the  use  of  the  pulpit  to  the  goveniment  only  for  the  publica- 
tion of  acts  relating  to  religion.     For  this  refusal  they  were  accused  before 
their  ecclesiastical  courts,  and  acquitted,  but  they  were  punished  by  the  civil 
government  in  a  suspension  for  one  month  from  their  spiritual  duties.    To 
extricate  the  Church  from  this  thraldom  it  was  proposed  (Nov.  11,  1845),  in 
an  assembly  at  Lausanne   of  the  clergy  belonging  to  the  establishment,  that 
every  clergyman  should  resign  his  office,  when  a  majority  immediately  re- 
nounced their  charges  and  their  salaries.    But  as  they  po6*sessod  no  hold  upon 
the  popular  mind,  they  were  only  able  by  foreign  assistance  to  start  a  iVee 
Church  in  small  conventicles,  which  were  persecuted  by  the  police  until 
1850.    In  the  mean  time  the  government  found  but  scanty  means  for  the 
spiritual  support  of  the  Established  Church. 

§  461.     The  Anglican  Church  and  the  DiMenten, 

Bogue  &  Benntit,  H.  of  DLssentciK  Lond.  lSOS-12.  4  vols.  (ArchW  f.  KQ.  voL  IL  p.  Ml.  HL  ^ 
804.  497.  IV.  1.  237sa)  Lond.  ISa).  2  voU  J.  Bennett,  H.  of  Dias.  during  tbo  last  ai)  yearx  LundlSSH 
K.  II  Stick,  u.  R*L  u.  K.  In  Engl.  Bri,  18ia  Funlr,  Organlslrang  d.  ongl.  Stiiatsk.  Alton.  1989.  M 
Roo»A,  Ecclesiastfca,  or,  The  Church,  hor  schools  and  her  clergy.  Loml.  1^2.  &  If.  F.  Uhden^  d.  Zs* 
Btiinde  d.  angl.  K.  Lps.  l$4a  0.  V.  GfrUiv\  &.  d.  rel.  Za»tand.  d.  angL  K.  Potad.  1S4&  C.  SckctO, 
d.  kirclil.  Zastande  in  Engl.  (Oelzer.  prot  Munatsch.  1S53.  May.)  [J.  Grant,  11.  of  the  Engl  Cbutfa 
«!ic  of  tbo  Sects  whidi  have  departed  fh>in  hor  Com.  Lond.  13I1-2G.  4  vols.  8.] 

The  principal  religious  activity  of  the  country  was  found  among  the  Dis- 
senters, who  constituted  about  one  third  of  the  whole  population,  and  in 
Wales  the  miyority.  But  as  they  possessed  no  common  centre,  they  became 
broken  up  into  a  great  variety  of  sects,  among  which  might  be  seen,  in  their 


a)  Brl.  K.  Z.  1S4C.  N.  8a  1S50.  N.  49. 

h)  £»al  snr  la  manifestation  dos  convictions  relig.  ct  »ur  la  a^paraUon  d«  Pcgl.  et  da  Tetat  FK- 
1$42.  Iidlb.  li^.    Considerations  dediees  a  Mss.  Ics  mlnbtres  d<iiiiteionalrea.  Laos.  1SI& 


CHAP.  y.    EVANO.  CHURCH  TILL  1858.    f  461.  ENGLAND.  599 

extreme  forms,  every  grade  of  religious  life,  from  the  most  enthusiastic  exal- 
tation down  to  the  most  sceptical  rationalism.  Some  of  the  principal  sects 
among  them,  however,  have  recently  attempted  to  unite  together  in  more 
intimate  fellowship.  They  were  protected  and  mtide  subservient  to  various 
party  purposes  by  the  opposition  in  Parliament,  but  with  all  his  eloquence, 
Fo^  was  unsuccessful  when  ho  pleaded  (1790)  for  their  civil  rights.  (//)  But 
with  the  increasing  spirit  of  general  freedom,  public  sentiment  became 
changed,  and  after  many  attempts  at  partial  relief  the  test  act  was  finally 
abolished  in  1828,  and  the  exclusive  right  of  the  Episcopal  clergy  to  solem- 
nize marriage  and  baptism  for  dissenters  was  taken  away  in  183G.  They  were, 
however,  still  compelled  to  pay  taxes  to  the  Established  Church,  and  the 
House  of  Lords  thought  it  necessary,  by  lifeless  orthodox  forms,  to  protect 
the  Universities  under  the  patronage  of  the  State  against  the  intrusion  of  dis- 
senters. (&)  But  many  powerful  associations  avowed  their  deterniination  to 
promote  the  principle  of  religious  freedom,  not  only  in  England  but  in  every 
quarter  of  the  world.  (<•)  A  charter  was  obtained  for  the  University  of  Lon- 
don (1836),  the  object  of  which  was  principally  the  education  of  dissenters. 
The  £stabli<«hed  Churcli  became  almost  a  sinecure,  w^hile  the  actual  duties  of 
the  pastoral  office  were  either  evaded,  or  performed  by  poorly  paid  pastors 
and  hired  vicars.  ((/)  For  a  long  time  the  bishops  in  the  House  of  Lords, 
with  the  aristocracy,  set  themselves  in  direct  opposition  to  the  wishes  of  the 
people,  and  persons  of  worldly  sagacity  lost  confidence  in  tlie  spiritual  privi- 
leges of  the  bishops,  as  well  as  in  the  divine  right  of  tithes.  Tlie  injurious 
influence  of  an  Established  Church  was  demonstrated  by  the  dissenters,  and 
the  bishops  were  warned  by  the  government  to  set  their  house  in  order. 
They  appealed  to  the  oath  t^ken  by  the  king  at  his  coronation,  that  he  would 
maintain  the  inviolability  of  the  Church,  and  by  virtue  of  which  he  held  his 
crown.  But  an  evangelical  party  had  now  been  developed  wliich  especially 
represented  the  Protestant^  as  the  High  Church  ])arty  did  the  Catholic  ele- 
ment in  the  Episcopal  Church.  This  evangelical  party  expected  deliver- 
ance only  in  such  a  reformation  as  was  demanded  by  the  times,  {t)  Certain 
literary  men  at  Oxford,  of  whom  the  principal  were  Newman  jmd  Pusey 
(after  1833),  raised  the  Catholic  element  to  a  still  higher  j)osition.  The  ob- 
ject of  these  persons  was  avowed  to  be  the  revival  of  genuine  Catholicity. 
Protestantism  was  disavowed,  and  many  Catholic  but  old  ecclesiastical  usages 
and  statutes,  so  for  as  they  were  consistent  with  the  thirty-nine  articles,  were 
brought  once  more  into  practice.  These  ettbrts  were  favored  by  the  High 
Church  party,  until  their  gradually  developed  tendencies  to  Roman  Catholi- 
cism aroused  the  Protestant  spirit  of  the  nation,  and  Pmcyum  was  rejected, 
even  by  the  bishops.    Since  that  time  many  persons  have  passed  over  from 


a)  Staftdlin^  Ocogr.  a.  Stat  vuL  I.  p.  IG'iss. 

b)  After  BeterUy ;  A.  Z.  isai.  N.  W2.  229.    Rhelnwald,  Re^  vol.  XXIX.  p.  9283. 

c)  A-  Z.  1S*L  N.  150.        </)  A.  K.  Z.  1S31.  p.  812. 

<)  Lord  UenUy,  A  Plan  of  Church  Itcform.  Loud.  e<L  4.  1S82.  [K<Unb.  Review,  vol.  XXXVIIL 
p.  14.-).  \\h.  1S23.  XLIV.  p.  490.  Sept  1S26.  (ScL  from  Kd.  Rev.  Par.  158.^.  voL  V.  p.  4..M-3-24.)  B.  W, 
Jioel^  Union  of  Chb.  dc  Stole.  Lond.  &  New  York.  1:J49.  12.J  Further  Reform  LiU-raturo:  iV.  K.  Z. 
IbSa    Lit.  BL  N.  49.  Stud.  u.  Krit  1S88.  P.  U 


600  MODERN  CHUBCH  HISTOBT.    PER.  TL    A.  D.  1M8-18081 

the  Established  to  the  Catholic  Church.  (/)  During  this  collidon  of  parties, 
and  in  consequence  of  the  serious  spirit  of  practical  piety  excited  among  the 
people  (after  1820),  a  new  and  fresh  life  was  awakened  in  the  bosom  of  the 
Church  itself.  The  hierarchy  gave  up  a  portion  of  its  tithes  that  they  might 
not  have  the  whole  wrested  from  them.  In  1836  a  bill  for  the  reform  of  the 
Church  was  introduced  into  Parliament  by  Lord  Russell.  It  diminished  the 
prodigious  ine(|ualities  which  had  existed  in  the  revenues  of  the  bishops,  im- 
proved and  increase<l  the  parishes  by  means  of  a  portion  of  the  sinecures,  and 
placed  restraints  upon  pluralities  and  the  performance  of  pastoral  duties  by 
hired  proxies.  Some  further  concessions  were  made  even  by  the  aristocracy, 
when  a  Commission  for  Inquiry  was  appointed  by  Sir  Robert  Peel.  The 
ministry,  however,  admonished  the  reformers  that  they  should  be  satisfied 
with  what  they  could  get,  rather  than  attempt  radical  changes.  The  conces- 
sions wore  accepted  with  much  reluctance  by  the  majority  in  the  Lower 
House,  and  constituted  the  commencement  of  a  reform,  which  was  subse- 
quently carried  out  in  the  same  spirit  in  the  Ecclesiastical  Revenue  Bill 
(1840).  (g)  When  a  number  of  bishops  had  been  consecrated  for  foreign 
countries  the  ministry  began  also  to  endow  dioceses  in  England  with  the  sav- 
ings of  the  hierarchy  (1847),  without  connecting  with  them  seats  in  the 
House  of  Lords,  (h)  The  Church  Pastoral  Aid,Society,  with  the  assistance 
of  Parliament  and  munificent  voluntary  contributions  from  the  people,  erected 
numerous  churches  in  the  commercial  towns,  and  sent  forth  assistant  preach- 
ers to  supply  the  spiritual  wants  of  an  increasing  population.  When  Gorham^ 
a  vicar,  was  accused  of  teaching  that  the  grace  of  regeneration  does  not  ne- 
cessarily accompany  the  act  of  baptism,  and  when  the  Bishop  of  Exeter,  who 
was  favorable  to  Puseyism,  refused  to  admit  him  to  the  benefico  to  which  he 
had  been  presented  by  the  crown,  he  was  instituted  (1847-50),  in  accordance 
with  the  verdict  of  the  privy  council,  the  highest  ecclesiastical  court  (after 
1883),  in  s{iite  of  the  protest  of  his  bishop,  on  the  ground  that  his  views 
were  not  incon<%istent  with  the  articles  of  the  Englisli  Church.  In  this  affair 
was  exhibited  on  the  one  hand,  the  stubbornness  of  episcopal  orthodoxy  even 
when  not  much  sustained  by  public  opinion,  and  on  the  other,  the  impropriety 
of  submitting  theological  controversies  for  decision  to  the  civil  courts.  But 
all  atteniptit  springing  out  of  it  to  raise  the  assemblies  of  the  clergy  from  their 
nominal  existenco  to  the  real  spiritual  powers  which  they  formerly  possessed 
(p.  442),  or  at  least  to  transfer  the  decision  of  controversies  on  ecclesiastical 
doctrines  to  the  episcopal  courts,  were  frustrated  either  in  Parliament  or  by 
the  ministry,  (i) 


f)  Neiomah)  Tract**  fur  the  ttmos,  espec  No.  90 ;  Remarks  on  certain  pMaages  In  the  89  Aitt  ISif. 
(Brl.  K.  Z.  1811.  N.  8i.  3G.  42.)  E.  B.  Puaey,  The  Articles  treated  on  in  Tract  90  rooonsiilored.  Oil 
1841.  H.  Aheken^  lA-'ttor  to  K.  B.  Pusey,  in  reforenco  to  certain  charges  against  tlie  Germ.  Church. 
Lond.  1842.  M.  Pftri,  Bfitrr.  z.  Wurdlg.  d.  Pus,  Oott  184a  «  II.  C.  Fock,  d.  Pns.  (Schwcfler, 
Jahrbb.  1S44.  p.  742ss )  R.  Weaver,  d.  Pub.  A.  d.  Engl  y.  Amtbor,  Lps.  1844.  Bnina,  Rep.  18M.  roL 
VI.  p.  ISlss.  vol.  VII.  p.  89S8. 

g)  A.  Z.  1836.  N.  198.    Sapplera.  N.  211.  216.  288.  Brl  K,  Z.  1840.  N.  78. 

h)  Brl.  K.  Z.  1847.  N.  85. 

i)  Zeltsch.  f.  hist  Th.  1S53.  II.  1.  [Jndguiont  of  the  Dean  of  the  Arches*  Oonrt  in  the  ease  tf 
Oorhain  v.  tlie  Bishop  of  Exeter.  Lond.  1849.] 


CHAP.  V.    EVANO.  CHURCH  TILL  1858.    $462.  NORTH  AMERICA.  601 

§  462.     Ecclesiastical  Affairs  in  the  North  American  Republic, 

A.  Rfed  and  J.  JfathMon,  Visit  to  the  American  Churcheii.  New  Yoric.  \SS6.  2  vols.  (Kv.  KZ 
1887.  N.  Sw.)  If.  Camoell,  America  and  the  Anier.  Church.  2  cd.  Lond.  1S53.  (Ev.  ICZ.  1839.  N. 
6««.)  J.  D.  Riipp,  He  pasa  EkkleMa,  or  HisL  of  the  Eel.  Denominations  In  the  U.  S.  Plill.  1S44. 
Jt  B(tird,  Religion  in  the  IT.  S.  Kdlnb.  1S44.  Revised  as  KOesch.  n.  klrchl.  Statist,  by  C.  Branden, 
BrI.  1*44.  [Ibid.  Chr.  Retroupcct  and  Register.  N.  York.  1850. 12.  Ibid.  Rel.  Denouwn.  in  the  U. 
8.  (in  Amer.  and  For.  Chr.  Union,  vol.  I.  N.  2.— vol.  III.  N.  4.)  Rel.  Dcnomni.  in  the  V.  S.  by  vari- 
ous authore.  Ilarrljiburg.  2  e<l.  1849.  P.  D.  OorrU,  Churches  and  Sects  in  the  V.  S.  N.  York.  1S.V().]~ 
J.  O.  BUttner,  Briefe  aas  u.  CL  N.  A.  Dresd.  1^*45.  2  vols.  F.  v.  Ranmer,  [America  and  the  Amer. 
People,  from  the  Germ.  N.  York.  184«.  8.]  Lps.  1845.  2  vols.-  IK.  Klo»e,  d.  chr.  K.  in  d.  Veroin.  St 
N.  A.  (Zeitsch.  t  hisL  Th.  1848.  II.  1.)    {J.  Dixon,  Tour  through  the  U.  S.  N.  York.  ll>48.  12.] 

[A  peculiar  form  of  ecclesia.stical  life  has  been  developed  in  tlie  United 
States  of  America.  The  religious  spirit  has  there  been  allowed  unlimited 
freedom  to  assume  every  variety  of  external  organization,  and  has  found  full 
scope  for  its  utmost  zeal.  The  national  and  State  governments  are  prohibited 
by  their  constitutions  from  all  interference  with  religion,  but  Christianity  is 
generally  recognized  as  a  part  of  the  common  law,  stringent  regulations  are 
in  force  against  blasphemy  and  the  profanation  of  the  Sabbath,  and  public 
prayers  are  daily  offered  in  connection  with  all  logi.slative  proceedings,  (a) 
Error  is  permitted  to  contend  on  equal  terms  with  truth,  no  civil  disability  is 
imposed  for  opinion's  sake,  and  all  may  propagate  their  views  in  public  and 
in  private  as  long  as  the  riglits  of  others  are  not  invaded.  As  yet,  there  is 
no  evidence  that  in  such  circumstances  Christianity  will  not  triumph.  In  the 
exercise  of  its  free  energies,  it  has  contended  with  a  highly  stimulated 
worldly  spirit  and  a  multitude  of  errors,  which  have  here  found  their  best 
and  often  only  asylum  ;  and  not  only  is  it  almost  universally  received,  but  its 
most  prevalent  forms  are  those  of  the  strictest  evangelical  piety.  From  the 
peculiar  origin  and  history  of  the  nation,  we  should  of  course  expect  to  find 
that  its  ecclesiastical  organizations  and  usages  resemble  those  of  the  Old 
World.  But  the  Puritan  and  Methodistic  elements  have  been  especially 
attracted  there,  and  have  become  prominent  in  the  national  character.  The 
zeal  engendered  by  an  earnest  Christianity  thrown  into  such  powerful  conflict 
with  the  world,  has  led.  its  friends  to  an  intense  use  of  ordinary  and  extra- 
ordinary means  for  the  conversion  of  men,  and  the  religious  revivals  which 
have  sometimes  been  witnessed  in  other  lands,  have  here  become  frequent,  (ft) 
Accustomed  also  to  rely  much  upon  the  power  of  numbers,  great  societies 
have  been  formed  for  the  removal  of  social  evils,  and  for  combined  effort  to 
plant  the  institutions  of  the  gospel  among  the  destitute  at  home  and  abroad. 
A  majority  of  the  whole  population  have  abandoned  the  habitual  use  of 
intoxicating  drinks,  and  seven  States  of  the  Union  have  already  prohibited 
the  Side  of  them  as  an  ordinary  beverage.  More  than  8,000  ministers  of  the 
gospel  are  sustained  principally  in  the  older  States,  to  labor  among  the  newer 


a)  Constitutions  of  the  several  States,  and  of  the  U.  8.  Ac  N.  York.  8.  J.  Stort/,  Exposition  of 
the  Const,  of  the  U.  S.  N.  York.  1S4T.  J/!  McKinney,  Amer.  Magistrate.  (Pliilad.  1S50.)  p.  680.  IIW. 
tO&     G.  T.  Curtis,  Hist  of  the  Const  of  the  U.  8.  N.  York.  1854.  2  vols. 

b)  W.  R  Sprague^  Lectt  on  Revivals.  Albany.  1882.  8.  A.  Airn^,  On  Revivals.  N.  York. 
1M1.  C.  Finney,  Lectt  on  Revivals.  N.  York.  1885.  Colton,  Hist  and  Char,  of  Amor.  Revivals. 
Lond.  1882. 


602  MODEBN  CHUBCH  HISTOBY.    P£B.  YL    A.  D.  IMfr-lSSflL 

Bettloments  of  the  West  and  South,  (c)    There  is  one  bonse  of  worship  for 
every  646,  and  one  minister  for  every  600  of  the  entire  population,  (d)    As 
each  denomination  of  Christians,  in  case  of  general  disagreement  or  grieT- 
ancc,  fin(L<^  its  ultimate  remedy  in  separation,  numerous  sects  have  sprung  up, 
without  important  distinctions  in  doctrine  or  organization;  but  the  evils  of 
disunion  arc  in  many  instances  much  mitigated  by  an  interchange  of  corre- 
j^ponding  delegates  through  their  superior  assemblies,  by  the  free  reception 
of  each  other's  ministers  and  members  on  prescribed  terms,  and  by  co-opera- 
tion in  many  of  the  national  charitable  associations.    The  Boman  Catholic 
Church  has  in  some  instances  attempted  to  ingraft  upon  itself  popular  traits 
and  usjtges,  but  its  general  spirit  of  uniformity  has  resisted  them,  and  its  pre- 
vailing character  here  is  the  same  as  in  the  Old  World.    Its  growth  in  this 
country  has  been  for  a  few  late  years  remarkably  rapid,  almost  exclusively 
by  Catliolic  emigrants  from  Europe,  multitudes  of  whom,  however,  are  for 
ever  lost  to  the  general  Roman  fold,  (e)    The  vast  funds,  numerous  clergy, 
and  other  laborer^s  with  wliich  foreign  societies  have  supplied  it,  have  ena- 
bled it  to  establish  many  institutions  for  education  and  charity,  and  erect  a 
splendid  hierarcliy,  which  give  it  great  power  for  proselytism,  and  have 
raised  the  hope  tliat  Rome  might  recover  its  life  by  appropriating  to  itself 
the  youtljful  enerj^ies  of  this  growing  nation.  (/)    But  by  its  conflicts  with 
educational  establishments,  by  its  unity  of  action  in  behalf  of  political  inter- 
ests, and  by  its  sympathies  and  connections  with  foreign  and  anti-republican 
influences,  it  luus  awakened  against  itself  a  powerful  political  and  religious 
feeling  which  has  sometimes  broken  forth  into  unlawful  violence,  {g)    It 
probably  has  under  its  control,  principally  in  the  large  cities,  in  Maryland  and 
in  Louisiana,  about  one  in  twelve  of  the  whole  population.     The  Epi$eopal 
Church,  though  the  oldest  (1607),  is  still  among  the  smallest  of  the  Protes- 
tant sects,  but  its  progress  has  recently  become  accelerated  especially  among 
the  wealthy  and  conservative  classes.     It  differs  from  its  parent  English 
Church  by  its  want  of  a  connection  with  a  civil  establishment,  by  an  exten- 
sive participation  of  the  laity  in  the  legblative  and  administrative  power  of 
the  Church,  and  by  its  synodal  constitution  under  annual  diocesan  and  tri- 
ennial national  conventions,  (/t)     The  CongregationalisU^  whose  first  church 
was  formed  in  the  ship  which  conveyed  the  pilgrims  to  America  (1619),  and 
who  are  principally  descendants  of  the  English  Puritans,  believe  that  each 
congregation  possesses  all  ecclesiastical  power  in  itself;  but  in  the  exercise  of 
this,  they  form  occasional  Councils,  composed  of  neighboring  ministers  and 
the  delegates  of  contiguous  churches,  for  the  ordination,  the  settlement,  and 
the  dismission  of  ministers ;  District  Associations,  composed  of  a  few  minis- 
ters and  churches  who  may  permanently  associate  for  mutual  counsel  and 


c)  R.  Rnrd,  Retrospect,  p.  218s8.  259aa.         d)  Abstract  of  Censoa.  pi  29. 

e)  Amor,  and  Yor.  Clir.  ITnion.  Aug.  1852.  p.  251.    N.  York  Observer,  Jnne  10, 1852. 

/)  Catholic  Almanac  for  1S54.  Bait.  1854.  Foreign  CoDsplrMj.  New  York.  1S8S.  2f.  L  Riot, 
Bomanisin,  the  Knoiny  of  Education,  Free  InstitaUons,  d&a  Cindn.  1852.  12. 

g)  Uonianl>in  incompatible  with  Kepublican  Principles.  N.  York.  1884  18.  Our  Goaotrf.itl 
Danger,  dec.  N.  York.  1S4().  18.    O.  R  Chetwr,  Right  of  the  Bible  in  Schoola.  N.  York.  185a  \L 

h)  a  Wilberfurcf,  Hist  of  the  Prot  Episc.  Church  In  Am.  Lond.  and  N.  Y.  (1S44)  ISM^  tl 
)i:  White,  II.  of  Uic  Church.  N.  York.  1854.  %.    A.  R  Chapin,  in  Hist  of  £eL  Denoin.  p.  MIml 


CHAP.  Y.    EYANQ.  CHUBCH  TILL  185a    S  468.  NOBTH  AMEEIC'A.  603 

fellowship;  and  General  Associations  or  Consociations,  comprising  all  the 
ministers  and  churches  of  a  State.  Such  bodies,  however,  liave  only  advi- 
sory power,  and  their  decisions  have  the  force  of  discipline  only  by  their 
moral  influence.  The  intelligence,  the  systematic  benevolence,  and  the  sober 
piety  of  this  people,  have  rendered  them  especially  influential.  They  prevail 
principally  in  the  six  Eastern  States,  in  New  York,  and  north  of  the  Ohio. 
They  acknowledge  the  absolute  authority  of  no  uninspired  creed,  but  great 
respect  is  paid  to  certain  Calvinistic  Confessions  of  Faith  and  Catechisms 
which  are  used  among  them,  and  some  of  their  divines  have  exerted  a  deci- 
sive influence  upon  the  theology  of  the  age.  (/)  Near  the  close  of  the  last 
and  the  commencement  of  the  present  century,  a  number  ot  the  Congrega- 
tional ministers  and  churches  of  Massachusetts  were  known  to  believe  Uni- 
tarian doctrines ;  but  a  general  separation  was  not  efleoted  until  (1815)  the 
orthodox  party  were  startled  by  some  announcements  respecting  the  progress 
of  Unitarianism  in  America  in  an  English  publication,  and  immediately  with- 
drew their  fellowship  from  all  who  were  suspected.  (A-)  After  an  excited 
controversy,  the  Unitarian  Congregationalists  were  left  in  a  distinct  body, 
which  has  since  extensively  prevailed  in  the  vicinity  of  Boston,  with  an  ele- 
gant literature,  a  high  standard  of  morality,  and  a  liberal  philanthropy. 
There  are  said  to  be  in  the  United  States  not  less  than  250  congregations 
especially  connected  together  as  Unitarians ;  but  a  still  larger  body  who  call 
themselves  by  the  simple  name  of  Christians,  the  Universalists,  and  a  seced- 
ing portion  of  the  Society  of  Friends,  agree  with  them  in  the  distinctive 
article  of  their  faith.  The  Baptists  follow  next  in  the  order  of  time  (1639); 
and  if  we  include  under  the  appellation  all  who  deny  the  validity  of  baptism 
except  by  immersion,  and  on  the  professed  faith  of  the  subject,  they  must  bo 
regarded  as  the  most  numerous  denomination  but  one  in  the  United  States. 
With  but  few  exceptions,  they  are  rigidly  Calvinistic  in  doctrine,  but  they 
agree  with,  and  even  exceed  the  Congregationalists  in  their  rejection  of  all 
human  authority  in  matters  of  faith,  and  in  their  practical  maintenance  of 
the  independence  of  the  congregations.  They,  however,  have  their  occa- 
sional Councils,  their  Associations  for  small  districts,  their  Conventions  for 
States,  and  until  the  recent  separation  of  the  Northern  and  Southern  sections, 
a  Triennial  General  Convention  for  the  whole  nation.  A  large  number  of 
Baptist  churches  are  never  represented  beyond  their  district  Associations, 
and  difler  from  their  brethren  on  many  important  articles  of  faith  and  prac- 
tice, (l)  Many  minor  sects  have  seceded  from  the  general  fellowship,  on  the 
ground  of  questions  connected  with  tlie  Sabbath,  missions  to  the  heathen,  the 
nature  of  the  faith  and  obedience  to  be  professed  before  baptism,  and  the 


i)  G.  Puru'hard.  View  of  Congregationalism.  Andover,  1888.  Ibid.  IIl5t,  of  Cong.  And.  184SL 
Cambridge  and  Saybrook  Platforms  of  Cburch  I>i9c  Boeton.  1889.  %.  T.  C.  Uphnm,  Ratio  Di»- 
ciplinae.  Portland.  !d29.  L.  Bacon^  Man.  uf  Church  Members.  Ne^r  Haven.  ISSS.  R.  Baird^ 
Sketches  of  ttio  UeL  Denom.  in  Am.  and  For.  Chr.  Union,  vol.  L  N.  8.  ix  123. 

k)  BfUham^  Memoirs  of  Lindsoy.  Lond.  1812.  Boaton.  1S15.  A.  Lamwn^  in  Tlol.  Denom.  p.  &S6. 
Letters  on  the  Introd.  and  Prog.  *A  Unitarianism  in  New  EngL,  in  Spirit  of  the  Pilj^riios.  vol  II.  and 
III.  B<«ton.  lSi9-8n. 

t)  J).  B^ifdict^  Hist  of  the  Baptists.  N.  York.  1824  W.  Ilaguf^  Bap.  Chiircli  Transplanted,  Aa 
K.  York.  1S46.  12.    F.  A.  Cox  and  J.  Iloby,  Baptists  in  America.  Boeton.  1839.  12. 


604  MODERN  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  VL    A.  D.  1MS-185& 

general  doctrines  of  religion,  (m)  Of  late  years,  some  portions  of  this  de- 
nomination liave  done  much  to  redeem  their  order  from  the  reproach  of  in- 
difference  to  education,  and  they  have  now  under  their  control  fourteen 
colleges,  and  eight  tlieological  seminaries.  The  Preshi/terians  are  also  sepa- 
rated into  many  minor  divisions,  among  which  the  Dutch  Reformed  (since 
1619),  the  German  Reformed  (s.  1720),  the  Associate  (s.  1750),  and  the  Re- 
formed Presbyterian  (s.  1752),  have  always  maintained  a  distinct  existence 
since  tlieir  first  settlement  in  this  country ;  and  others,  as  the  Cumberland 
(1810)  and  the  Free  Presbyterian  (1846),  were  offshoots  from  the  main  body. 
In  1838  this  main  body  was  itself  divided  into  two  nearly  equal  portions, 
each  claiming  to  be  the  true  Presbyterian  Church,  but  differing  from  each 
other  in  their  construction  of  their  articles  of  faith,  and  in  their  views  of 
ecclesiastical  policy,  (n)  With  a  slight  exception  with  respect  to  the  Cumber- 
land body,  (r>)  all  these  members  of  the  great  Presbyterian  family  claim  to  be 
Calvinistic  in  d(x;trine,  and  most  of  them  are  in  fraternal  correspondence  with 
each  other  through  their  highest  judicatories.  Their  form  of  government  is 
essentially  the  same  with  that  of  similar  European  bodies,  and  they  are  dis- 
tinguished for  their  intelligence,  tlieir  stability,  and  their  attachment  to  truth. 
The  Lutherans  have  retained  the  faith  even  better  than  the  language  of  their 
ancestors ;  they  arc  beginning  zealously  to  cultivate  the  orthodox  literature  of 
their  Fatherland,  and  are  providing  an  ec<jlesiastical  home  for  the  multitudes 
of  a  kindred  faith  who  are  landing  on  their  shores,  (p)  The  Methodists  have 
ndoi>ted  the  doctrines  and  discipline  of  the  English  Wesleyan  connection,  with 
no  08-<ential  change.  Their  Episcopacy  is  not  prelatic,  but  presbyterian,  since 
its  powers  originate  in,  and  are  continued  by  the  eldership,  and  its  duties  are 
simply  to  pre.'iide  in  the  conferences,  to  station  the  elders  and  preachers,  to 
ordain  bishops  and  deacons,  to  travel  through  the  connection,  and  to  oversee 
the  spiritual  concerns  of  the  Church.  They  have  been  especially  successful 
in  reaching  and  reclaiming  the  great  masses  of  society,  in  carrying  the  truth 
in  its  living  power  to  even  the  most  retired  districts ;  and  though  they  were 
the  last  to  commence  their  labors,  seventy  years  have  been  sufficient  for 
them  to  become  the  most  numerous  class  of  Protestant  Christians  in  the  Uni- 
ted States.  Their  ardent  zeal,  their  active  energy,  their  numerous  institu- 
tions of  learning,  their  earnest  literature,  and  their  thorough  system  of  polity, 
must  exert  a  powerful  niflnence  upon  the  future  character  of  the  nation.  A 
division  nearly  corresponding  with  the  geographical  boundary  between  the 
Northern  and  Southern  States,  has  taken  place  within  their  Church  on  ac- 
count of  slavery,  and  a  number  of  fragments  have  fallen  away  from  it  on 
account  of  its  government  and  discipline,  but  its  general  usefulness  and  sta- 
bility have  not  been  apparently  impaired,  (y)     Among  other  minor  bodies, 


f/?)  History  of  the  various  Baptist  socts  In  Rd.  Donomm.,  by  aathors  Wlonging  to  them.  See  alio 
Gorrie's  Churcbcs  ami  Sects,  p.  1328s.    Baird,  in  Aracr.  and  For.  Chr.  Union,  vol  1.  p.  ?<)Sa*.  SOSsaL 

n)  IIl^tt)ry  of  the  Division  of  the  Prcsb.  Church,  (by  a  Com.  of  tlie  Syn.  of  N.  York  and  X.  Jer- 
sey.) N.  York.  18.^2,  J.  Woodi*,  Old  and  Xow  Theology.  Philad.  l&4a  12.  A".  L,  Bice,  Old  and  New 
School*.  CMndn.  ISM  12.        o)  L.  Jomh,  Plea  for  the  Cumb.  Presb.  Church.  LoubviUe.  1S4:.  12. 

p)  Ev.  KZ.  ISU.  N.  aatw.  Conip.  Brl.  K.  Z.  184S.  N.  45.  Butter,  Briefe.  Dresd.  lS45i  2  rob. 
Conip.  Rluinw.  Ilcp.  v<.l.  XLIV.  p.  182*1. 

q)  A.  StereuH,  ()|,  C'liun.h  Polity.  N  York.  1S50.  12.  Memorial  of  Methodism.  N.  York.  1S5I.  11 
If.  Banffk,  UuL  of  the  M.  K.  Church  till  liUn.  N.  York.  1S86.  4  vols.  12. 


CHAP.  V.    EVANG.  CHURCH  TILL  1858.    $  462.  NORTH  AMERICA,  605 

there  are  about  6,000  Moravians  in  twenty-two  congregations,  under  as  many 
ministers,  and  two  bishops  claiming  apostolical  succession ;  (r)  about  150,000 
Friends^  whose  orthodoxy  and  eflBciency  have  been  increased  by  a  recent 
secession,  and  who,  in  spite  of  some  decline  in  their  numbers,  quietly  main- 
tain their  ancient  doctrines  and  usages  under  a  regular  system  of  Preparative, 
Monthly,  Quarterly,  and  ten  independent  Yearly  meetings ;  (.v)  about  6,000 
Shahru^  who,  since  the  decease  of  the  " Elect  Lady  "  (p.  546),  have  formed 
sixteen  communities  in  which  all  things  are  held  in  common,  and  endeavor 
to  find  the  purity  and  bliss  of  Paradise  in  perpetual  virginity,  and  a  wild 
mode  of  worship ;  {t)  about  8,000  Sicedenhorgiam^  with  an  extensive  litera- 
ture, and  a  number  of  highly  learned  and  eminent  advocates ;  ('/)  and  above 
1,100  societies  of  Unhersalists^  who  have  formed  a  regular  organization  under 
a  regular  ministry,  and  a  General  Convention,  and  have  collected  a  respect- 
able literature,  (r) — A  system  of  education,  from  which  all  sectarian  pecu- 
liarities is  excluded,  except  with  the  consent  of  the  local  inhabitants  of  a 
district,  is  provided  for  by  law,  in  some  States,  with  great  liberality  and  intel- 
ligence, and  in  all  with  increasing  emulation  and  zeal,  so  that  already  one  in 
five  of  the  whole  free  population  are  under  its  instruction.  In  many  denomi- 
nations of  Christians,  candidates  for  the  ministry  are  required  by  ecclesiastical 
rule  to  pass  through  what  is  equivalent  to  a  complete  course  of  collegiate  and 
theological  instruction,  and  in  nearly  all  the  usage  is  more  and  more  in 
accordance  with  such  a  rule.  In  no  part  of  the  world  are  the  clergy  more 
respected  and  laborious;  and  though  in  most  instances  sustained  entirely  by 
the  voluntary  contributions  of  their  people,  their  position  and  comparatively 
small  number  render  them  independent  of  popular  caprice.  The  piety  of  this 
people,  being  entirely  spontaneous,  is  remarkably  sincere  and  fervent,  and 
many  of  its  exhibitions,  which  seem  peculiar  and  even  grotesque,  will  be 
found  not  ill  adapted  to  the  wants  of  a  peculiar  population ;  but  we  need  not 
be  surprised  to  find  that  an  aristocracy  of  wealth,  and  a  regard  for  numerical 
power,  should  sometimes  divert  attention  from  the  refinements  of  a  graceful 
humanity.] 

§  463.     Legal  Conditions  with  respect  to  Catholic  Oorernments. 

The  Congress  of  Vienna  could  not  agree  with  regard  to  the  expressions 
by  which  the  constitution  of  the  Catholic  and  Protestant  churches  of  Ger- 
many were  to  be  placed  under  the  protection  of  the  Alliance.  The  sixteenth 
article  of  the  Act  of  the  Alliance  was  therefore  merely  so  formed,  that  no 
differences  between  the  parties  professing  the  Christian  religion  were  to  create 
any  inequalities  in  municipal  or  political  rights.  The  perfect  equality  of  both 
Churches,  so  far  as  relates  to  the  law  of  the  land,  has  accordingly  been  more 
or  less  expressly  acknowledged  by  most  of  the  states  connecte<l  with  the 
Alliance,  (a)    In  Bavaria^  however,  in  addition  to  other  violations  of  Prot- 

r)  L.  D.  von  SchiceiniU,  in  the  Hist  of  ReL  Denomm.  p.  8508&. 

«)  71  Eearui  and  W.  Gibbons,  Hlj^torlcs  in  Ibid.  p.  279s«.  290891 

f)  a  Gre€n  and  .SL  Y.  WtlU,  A  Summary  View  of  the  Millennial  Charcb.  N.  York.  1828w  18. 

u)  New  Jerusalem  Magazine.  B<x<ton.  26  voK  1S27-1S54. 

V)  T.  Whiti^more^  Mod.  Hist  of  UnivcrsaliKm.  Borton,  1880.  18. 

o)  Kluber,  Uobersi  d.  Verb.  d.  W.  Congr.  Abth.  &  p.  897.  Ulaa.     TiUmann^  Qua«ea  de  art.  16 


606  MODEBN   JlIUBCn  HISTOBV.    PER.  YL    A.  D.  164S-1858. 

estant  privileges,  an  onler  dictated  by  a  new  zeal  in  favor  of  Catholicism, 
required  all  persons  connected  with  the  army  to  bow  the  knee  to  the  sacra- 
mental host  (Ang.  14th,  1838).  Tliis  was  regarded  by  the  Protestants  as  a 
measure  intended  to  compel  them  to  commit  what  seemed  to  them  an  act  of 
idolatry,  or  at  Ie:ist  as  an  illegal  imposition  upon  their  consciences.  Although 
it  was  described  to  them  as  legally  only  a  military  ceremony,  it  was  practi- 
cally adhered  to  as  if  it  were  a  triumph  of  the  Catholic  Church ;  and  after  a 
long  series  of  forced  and  partial  concessions,  it  was  not  completely  yielded 
to  the  bitter  complaints  of  the  whole  Protestant  population,  until  (Dec.  12th, 
1846)  the  diet  threatened  to  adopt  the  grievances  of  the  Protestant  deputies 
as  its  own.  (b)  In  the  Austrian  hereditary  states,  Protestantism  was  but  par- 
tially tolerated,  and  until  the  movement  of  1848,  its  churches  were  inter- 
dicted the  use  of  names  and  spires,  and  were  deprived  of  important  rights,  (e) 
To  take  from  them  the  necessity  of  going  to  foreign  universities,  a  theologi- 
cal school  was  opened  for  them  at  Vienna  (1821).  In  Bohemia,  recollections 
of  the  Hussites  were  awakened  with  the  revival  of  the  national  spirit  of  the 
ancient  Czecheu.  In  the  Zillerthcd^  certain  ancient  traditions  preserved  at 
Salzburg,  and  evangelical  influences  upon  some  Tyrolese  travellers,  produced 
a  party  strongly  opposed  to  the  CathoKc  Church.  This  opposition  was  still 
farther  increased  by  the  perusal  of  the  Scriptures,  and  finally  induce<l  a  few 
families  to  make  application  (1826)  for  liberty,  in  conformity  with  the  spirit 
of  the  Edict  of  Toleration,  to  join  the  Evangelical  Church.  But  as  the  states 
of  Tyrol  were  oppose<l  to  a  Protestant  form  of  worship  in  their  country,  and 
contended  that  the  Edict  of  Toleration  was  never  published  for  such  cases 
and  as  the  evangelical  party  continued  to  increase  even  under  the  oppression 
of  a  decidedly  Catholic  population,  and  with  no  services  for  public  worship, 
the  emperor  finally  commanded  them  cither  to  settle  in  some  other  province, 
or  to  emigrate  to  another  country.  In  these  circumstances  they  addressed 
tliemselves  to  the  King  of  Prussia,  who  erected  for  them  a  church  and  pri- 
vate dwellinj^s  on  his  domain  of  Erdmansdorf  in  Silesia.  Thither,  in  the 
autumn  of  1837,  about  four  hundred  of  them  removed,  although  a  hundred 
never  became  settled  there,  or  in  1838-39  left  their  new  Zillerthal,  to  connect 
themselves  with  some  of  the  Lutherans  who  had  separated  themselves  from 
the  established  churches.  (</)  In  Hungary^  when  the  partial  privileges  con- 
ceded by  the  law  respecting  religion  had  been  in  many  ways  violated,  and 
the  complaints  of  throe  millions  of  Protestants  had  been  for  a  long  time  dis- 

Foc<1orifl  Germ.  L.  1830.     W.  v.  Uofienthal,  d.  Faritut  d.  Eechte  zw.  d.  kath.  a.  nichtkath.  Unterth. 
d.  Bundcsst  L.  1881. 

h)  Kv.  K.  Z.  1S44.  N.  6TBeL— {AT.  t.  Oiech)  Die  Kniebeng.  d.  Proteotanten  vor  d.  Sanrtlsfflraiiin  d. 
kath.  K.  Ulin.  1841.  With  *'Offenon  Bedenken''  of  1844-45  against  later  insufficient  modlflcatloafc 
A.  IIarl€M:  Offeno  Antw.  Munch.  1843.  a.  Zeitschr.  f.  Prut  a.  K.  1848.  vuL  VI.  F.  ThUr»ek,i. 
Protest  n.  Knieb.  8  Sendschr.  an  Dr.llinger.  Marb.  i$U.—J.  DdUivger :  Die  Frage  y.  d.  Knieb.  4 
ProL  V.  d.  rtl.  u.  8taat*rcchtL  Seito.  MQnch.  1848.  Der  Prot  In  Baiem  o.  d.  Knieb.  Kegcnsb.  IStt. 
Lit  Ucbors.  by  Schoder  in  d.  Jen.  Lit  Z.  1840.  N.  202aa.  Brans,  R•^  1S4S.  vol  IIL  p.  84m.  Bri. 
K.  Z.  1846.  N.  15.  2.'is. 

c)  J.  Hrt/t-rt,  d.  Rochte  n.  Yerf.  d.  Akatholiken  im  (istr.  Kalserst  Vlen.  (2  ed.  1887.)  1848. 

d)  (nMntcald)  Die  Evangdiscligesiiinten  im  ZillerthaL  Bri.  1887.  In  4  ed.:  Die  er.  Zillertbslff 
In  Schlesien.  1888.  AcU  hist  ecc  1887.  p.  eUes.  Bbeinw.  Rep.  toL  XXXVIL  p.  84ml  [Kxikiof 
ZillenbaL  (PubL  by  the  Am.  and  For.  Chr.  Union.)  N.  York.  1840. 1&] 


CHAP.  V.    EVANO.  CnUBCH  TILL  1858.    $  4«8-  HUNGARY.    FRANCE.        607 

regarded,  their  oanse  became  identified  in  public  estimation  with  the  free 
development  of  the  state.  At  the  Diet  of  1833,  the  great  majority  appeared 
enthnsiastic  for  justice  to  their  Protestant  fellow-citizens,  but  the  State-Table 
preferred  entirely  to  dispense  with  the  mutilated  bill  of  religions  grievances 
proposed  to  them  by  the  magnates,  and  rather  than  take  up  with  a  partial 
grant,  to  trust  to  their  chances  for  the  future,  {e)  At  the  Diets  of  1839-40, 
both  Tables  united  in  presenting  to  the  crown  certain  bills  by  which  the 
members  of  the  Evangelical  Church  were  guarantied  absolute  freedom,  and 
equality  of  legal  privileges.  But  when  the  papal  brief  of  April  80,  1841, 
against  the  ecclesiastical  confirmation  of  mixed  marriages  without  security 
that  the  children  should  be  educated  in  the  Catholic  faith,  had  received  the 
royal  sanction,  the  courts  began  to  infiict  penalties  upon  all  bishops  and  pas- 
tors who  acted  in  accordance  with  this  measure.  At  the  Diet  of  1843,  bold 
voices  were  raised  in  both  Tables  in  opposition  to  this  system  of  mediaeval 
Church  polity ;  and  although  there  was  still  an  episcopal  miyority  among  the 
magnates,  which  succeeded  in  modifying  the  demands  of  the  other  Table, 
both  houses  were  opposed  to  the  royal  order  of  July  6th,  respecting  mixed 
marriages.  They  declared,  that  while  they  were  agreed  with  regard  to  the 
principle  advanced  in  that  enactment  on  the  subjects  of  freedom  of  con- 
science and  complete  reciprocity,  the  only  proper  application  of  it,  as  well  as 
the  only  way  to  satisfy  the  minds  of  the  people,  which  they  could  discover, 
was  the  enactment  of  a  law  by  which  the  children  should  be  disposed  of 
according  to  the  religion  of  the  father,  except  where  special  promises  had 
been  conceded  by  one  of  the  parties  (reversales)  to  the  contrary.  Accord- 
ingly, the  whole  subject  was  virtually  disposed  of  by  the  royal  ordinances  of 
March  26th  and  Nov.  11th,  1844,  which  left  the  education  of  the  children  of 
mixed  marriages  to  be  determined  by  the  agreement  of  the  parents,  acknowl- 
edged the  validity  of  marriages  solemnized  in  the  Evangelical  Church,  and 
prohibited  the  clergy  from  arbitrarily  interfering  when  persons  were  dis- 
posed to  pass  from  the  one  to  the  other  Church.  (/)  But  the  storm  which 
since  1848  has  passed  over  Hungary,  has  for  a  while  committed  to  the  mili- 
tary power  the  Church  as  well  as  the  country  of  the  orator  from  whose 
mouth  issued  a  sword,  {(j)  In  the  south  of  France^  the  long-restrained 
hostility  of  the  Catholic  populace  broke  out  on  the  restoration  of  the  Bour- 
bons (1815),  and  for  three  months,  in  Nismes  and  its  vicinity,  the  members 
of  the  Reformed  Church  were  robbed,  murdered,  and  driven  from  their 
dwellings  by  the  flames.  No  notice  of  these  excesses  was  taken  by  the  gov- 
ernment until  expressions  of  indignation  from  all  parts  of  France  and  of 
Europe  found  their  way  to  the  throne.  Individual  instances  of  outrage  were 
repeated  in  1816,  the  perpetrators  of  which  were  never  punished ;  and  the 
Protestants  were  always  treated  with  contempt,  until  they  recovered  their 
privileges  at  the  revolution  of  1830.  (Ji)    But  their  Church  was  never  able 

tf)  Benwicty,  Nachr.  Q.  d.  Zaf>t  d.  Evr.  in  U.  Lp«.  1922.  FriedricK,  Br.  0.  d.  Lage  d.  er.  K.  in 
JJ.  Lpa.  1835.  Die  ReIlgionsbeechw«rden  d.  Prot  in  U.  a.  d.  Reichst  im  J.  18Sa.  edit  by  BlUiM 
TibUcftnuA^  Lps.  1888  [Hist  of  the  Prut  Church  in  Uun{;.  from  Uie  Ret  to  1850,  viith  reference 
also  to  Transylvania,  from  Uie  German  by  J.  Craig^  Lend.  1854.  8.] 

/)  J.v.  MaWith,  d.  Rel.  Wirren  in  U.  Ratisb.  1845.  2  vola  Nachtr.  RaUsb.  1840. 

g)  BrL  KZu  1890.  N.  17.  SO.  185L  N.  «.  9. 1892.  N.  M. 

A)  D^nae  des  ProCettana  da  Daa-LaDfuedoc  1819.  4.  (Areblv  t  KG.  toL  IIL  p.  S25fla)    WWt9, 


608  MODEBN  CHURCH  UI3T0BY.    TEE,  YL    A.  D.  lUS-18S8w 

to  come  together  in  a  general  synod,  and  by  a  decision  of  the  Court  of  Cas- 
sation (1843),  notwithstanding  the  fundamental  law  of  religious  liberty,  no 
evangelical  congregation  could  be  established  nnder  the  statute  respecting 
associations,  without  the  arbitrary  permission  of  the  government  and  the 
local  authorities,  (i)    Under  the  republic,  the  Lutheran  Church,  especially  in 
Alsace,  at  a  freely  elected  General  Assembly  in  Strasbourg,  and  the  Reformed 
Church  at  a  Synod  in  Paris,  deliberated  about  the  best  means  of  developing 
in  an  independent  manner  their  old   established  constitutions  (1848).  (1) 
Louis  Napoleon  ordained  (March  26th,  1852)  that  the  congregations  should 
be  governed  by  presbyteries,  and  their  districts  by  consistories,  freely  chosen 
by  them,  but  both  under  the  presidency  of  chosen  pastors  approved  by  the 
government ;  that  the  ehurclies  of  the  Augsburg  Confe,ssion  should  have  for 
their  superintending  and  legislative  authority  a  supreme  consistory,  to  be  con- 
vened annually,  and  to  be  composed  of  the  presidents  and  lay-deputies  of  all 
the  consistorie^i,  and  fi)r  their  administrative  authority,  a  directory,  half  of 
whose  members  were  to  be  appointed  by  the  government,  and  half  by  the 
supreme  consistory ;  and  that  the  Reformed  churches  should  have  a  Central 
Council  at  Paris,  with  indeliuite  powers,  and  consisting  for  the  first  time  of 
distinguished  ProtesUuits,  and  the  two  oldest  Parisian  pastors.  (Z)     In  the 
elections  held  under  this  edict,  all  persons  were  allowed  to  vote,  and  the  pres- 
byteries which  had  been  previously  iu  existence  were  confirmed.    The  Ecan- 
(jtlknl  Societi/^  a  free  association  formed  under  English  influence,  undertook 
to  evangelize  France  from  Geneva  (p.  505)  and  from  Paris  (since  1838);  for  it 
endeavored,  by  its  colporteurs  and  evangelists  with  Bibles  and  tracts,  not  only 
to  win  the  Catholics,  but  to  bring  back  the  Reformed  Church  to  its  original 
principles,  (///)  while  the  Society  for  the  General  Interests  of  Protestantism 
aimed  only  to  unite  the  orthodox  portion  of  the  Church  in  the  pursuit  of 
genenil  objects,  {n)    Although  the  Reformed  Church  has  since  increase<l,  not 
only  by  [)ersons  coming  from  other  bodies,  but  by  the  accession  of  thoee 
whose  i)references  had  either  been  unformed  or  concealed,  in  these  intellec- 
tual contests  its  spirituality  has  been  exposed  to  great  hazard.     When  the 
Synod  of  1848  resolved  to  disregard  all  confessions  of  faith,  that  it  might 
keep  the  Church  practically  united,  pastor  Fred.  Monod  and  Count  Gasparin, 
the  noble  champion  of  French  Protestantism,  abandoned  it.     On  their  invi- 
tation, thirty  congregations  which,  from  a  desire  to  possess  a  more  rigid  disci- 
pline or  a  purer  faith,  had  previously  been  independent,  now  united  in  a  Synod 
at  Paris  (1849),  and  formed  a  Union  of  evangelical  congregations  on  the  baas 
of  a  new  confession,  whose  articles  were  merely  devotional,  in  the  style  of 
the  apostles  John  and  Paul.    These  congregations  had  been  formed  with  a 
distinct  creed,  received  no  support  or  assistance  from  the  state,  and  were 


n.  of  the  Pcr?ooutlons  cntlarcd  by  the  ProU  of  the  Booth  of  Franco.  Lond.  1821.  2  vols.  (Kflkt 
Arcliiv.  1S23.  II.  Ss,) 

0  II.  lieucMin,  d  Chrlstentli.  in  Fr.  llainb.  1S87.  p.  88788.  I^  proces  de  Svnnoville.  MStixt^ 
libcrt*  do8  cultes,  plaidoe  par  Odillon  Bar  rot.  Par.  1S43.  (^4.  Mader)  Die  prot  K.  Fr.  17ST-lS46i  ei 
by  Gicseler,  Lpj^.  1849.  2  vols. 

k)  Brl.  K7.  1549.  N.  75.  89.  90.  98. 102.— 76.  95.  1S49.  N.  7. 

t)  Brl.  KZ.  l.sr>2.  N.  2S.  A.  KZ.  lS5a  N.  14a       m)  Organ :  Archive  do  Chrteaanianet 

n)  Aginor  df  Gatparin^  Les  Int^r^ta  g£*n6raux  da  Protest  fran^.  Par.  1848.  Easen.  1848. 


CHAP.  V.    EVANG.  CIIURCH  TILL  1863L    $  468.  FRANCE.    ITALY.  609 

independent  in  government  and  worship ;  but  they  now  resolved  to  maintain 
unity  by  means  of  a  bienni:J  synod,  and  a  synodal  commission  for  the  inter- 
vening period,  (o)  But  even  in  the  Reformed  National  Church  there  are  two 
opposite  parties :  the  Evangelical,  under  Ad.  Monod,  agreeing  in  doctrine 
with  the  Separatists,  and  anxious  to  preserve,  as  far  as  possible,  the  old  con- 
fes?ion  and  the  old  customs;  (;/)  and  the  Liberal  under  Goquerol,  rejecting 
every  creed  except  the  Scriptures  as  the  word  of  God,  and  before  the  altar 
of  the  Lord.  The  number  of  ministers  in  each  of  these  parties  is  nearly  the 
siime ;  they  remain  united,  and  both  are  rich  in  works  of  pious  charity,  (q) 
The  theological  faculty  at  Strasbourg  maintains  an  intimate  fellowship  witli 
German  science,  and  the  other  at  Montauban,  with  a  clergy  trained  by 
rhetorical  rules  and  with  a  practical  spirit,  is  conversant  principally  with  de- 
votional subjects,  (r)  By  its  acquisition  of  territory  in  1815,  and  by  its  Gon- 
stitntion  of  1842,  Geneva  lost  its  Protestant  independence.  («)  In  Itahj^  an 
evangelical  public  worship  was  needed  only  for  foreigners  residing  there. 
The  policy  of  the  goverimients  of  Milan  and  Florence  did  not  lead  them  to 
oppose  the  formation  of  particular  congregations.  A  regard  for  England, 
Prussia,  and  America,  disposed  Naples  and  the  ecclesiastical  states  U)  tolerate 
Protestant  chapels ;  and  after  the  old  prophecy  had  been  twice  fnltiUed,  Ger- 
man Protestantism  found  an  abode  in  the  Capitol.  (^)  When  the  national 
desires  of  the  Italians  began  to  come  in  conflict  with  the  hierarchy,  an  incli- 
nation towards  Protestantism  showed  itself  here  and  there  under  English 
influence,  and  the  pope  found  himself  threatened  by  a  host  of  reforming 
spirits  and  Italian  Bibles.  After  the  re-establishment  of  the  legitimate  au- 
thorities, the  revolutionary  religion  wtw  put  down,  and  many  a  victim  was 
sacrificed  in  the  prisons.  (//)  But  when  the  Mailini  family  in  Florence  were 
condemned  (June,  1852)  to  an  imprisonment  for  several  years,  on  a  charge 
of  endeavoring  to  make  proselytes  to  Protestantism  by  reading  the  Bible,  the 
zeal  of  their  Protestant  friends  in  England  became  powerfully  excited  against 
this  anachronism.  In  opposition  to  the  deputation  of  the  Evangelical  Alli- 
ance, and  the  intercession  of  the  King  of  Prussia  and  the  English  govern- 
ment, the  Grand  Duke  asserted  the  independence  of  his  judicial  courts,  and 
his  obligation  to  protect  the  religion  of  the  state ;  but  so  menacing  became 
the  popular  excitement  in  England  in  support  of  the  ministry,  that  tlie  Tus- 
can government  thought  it  best  to  get  rid  of  their  troublesome  prisoners  by 
sending  them  out  of  the  country  (March,  1853).  (r)  In  consequence  of  this 
affair,  an  association  was  formed  in  Hamburg  (Aug.  1853),  under  the  presi- 


o)  Union  de^  egl.  t'vnng.  do  France.  Par.  1850.  //.  JlnUmar^  Eutat  d.  Uulunsklrche  in  Fr. 
(Zeit*cb.  f.  hi*t  Th.  Is51.  H.  5.) 

p)  Adoljfhe  Mono'l,  iK»ur«iuoi  Jo  donicurc  dans  Tepl.  ctabllu.  Par.  19-19. 

q)  A.  Dam  man,  d.  [»rut  K.  in  Fr.  (Zt^itsch.  f.  hist.  Th.  1850.  H.  1.)  E.  8.  CL  d.  rel.  Zust  Fr. 
(Oelzer,  pnjt  M<»natBt'h.  1^53.  Aug. -Oct.) 

r)  £.  ReuH»,  d.  wIm.  The<»l.  untcr  d.  ft.  Prot  (Stud.  u.  Krit.  1S44.  II.  1.) 

9)  Comp.  IJrl.  KZ.  1S42.  N.  26.  A.  KZ.  1S53.  N.  149.   E.  Cunitz  In  tl  Jen.  T..  Z.  1S43.  N.  242-*s. 

t)  Jfi«bvhr'h  Bricfe.  vol.  II.  p.  -KJG.  FUck,  wisa.  Eel?e  Lps.  1S85.  vol  II.  1.  p.  124as.  It.  £aird, 
Sketches  of  ProtesiantUm  In  Italy,  past  and  present.  Ba»ton.  1846.  12. 

i#)  BrL  KZ.  1849  N.  7a  96.  1S50.  N.  21    Ev.  KZ.  1S52.  N.  93.  A.  D.  Z.  1S53.  N.  264 

f?)  Ev.  KZ.  1S52.  N.  102.  Brl.  KZ.  1S53.  N.  I6.-IIIj»L  poL  Bll.  1963.  vol.  XXXI.  p.  7S8sa.  [Story 
of  the  MadlaL  N.  York.  1858.    Amcr.  and  For.  Chr.  Union.  toL  II L  p.  SOTaa.  voL  IV.  pi  «5esa.] 


610  MODERN  CHURCH  HISTORT.    PER.  YL    A.  D.  16iS-18B8. 

dency  of  Lord  Shaftesbury,  with  an  execntive  committee  in  London,  to  assist 
by  every  means  sanctioned  by  the  gospel  all  who  might  suffer  persecution  for 
their  confession  of  Christ,  or  for  reading  and  distributing  the  Holy  Scrip- 
tures, (tr) 

§  4G4.     Old  and  Xeto  SicU. 

1.  The  Waldenses^  who  were  connected  with  the  Hussites  by  fraternal 
ties,  recognized  finally  in  tlie  Reformation  (Synod  of  Angrogra,  1532)  the 
very  objects  which  their  ancestors  had  been  obscurely  seeking,  (a)    They 
were  therefore  exterminated  in  France,  with  the  exception  of  some  remnants 
living  in  the  High  Alps  of  Dauphine,  but  they  have  been  preserved  under  • 
synodal  system  of  pastors  and  elders  in  tliree  Alpine  valleys  in  Piedmont 
Here  they  came  sometimes  under  the  influence  of  distinguished  persons  be- 
longing to  the  Genevan  Church,  though  generally  they  retained  the  character 
of  great  pious  simplicity.    They  have  been  much  oppressed  by  their  own 
authorities,  but  since  the  time  of  Cromwell,  they  have  received  i)ecuniary  aid 
from  the  English  government.    Napoleon  favored  them,  but  after  the  restora- 
tion they  were  thrown  back  under  their  former  oppressions,  and  confined  to 
the  narrow  valleys  of  their  ancestors,  (h)    The  flag  of  liberty  on  the  throne 
of  Piedmont  opened  to  them  the  whole  country  (Feb.,  1848),  the  inclination 
generally  felt  toward  Protestantism  found  among  them  a  primitive  legal  form, 
and  a  great  Waldensian  church  was  dedicated  witli  much  solemnity  in  the 
city  of  Turin  itself  (1853).  (e)     2.  Among  the  Menuonite$  in  Holland,  the 
Arminian  party  obtained  the  ascendency,  and  when  the  different  factions  of 
the  Gross  became  united,  all  distinct  creeds  were  abandoned  (1800).  {d)    The 
BaptUts  of  England  and  North  America  had  their  origin  principally  among 
the  Independents  (since  1630).    The  largest  portion  adhere  strictly  to  CJal- 
vinistio  orthodoxy  and  discipline,  but  a  part  are  Anninians  (General  Bap- 
tists), and  some  have  no  ecclesiastical  discipline.     Some  minor  communitieB 
among  them  have  originated,  in  some  instances,  from  their  adoption  of  the 
Jewish   Sabbath   (Sabbatarians) ;  in  others,  from  their  inculcating  opposi- 
tion to  the  slave-trade  as  a  religious  duty  (Emancipationists) ;  and  still  in  oth- 
ers, from  the  principle  of  abstinence  from  all  controversies  on  the  ordinary 
orthodox  doctrines  (Christians).  («)     In  Germany,  persons  sometimes  became 
Anabaptists  from  pietistic  scruples,  or  from  some  religious  extravagances,  and 
a  few  small  congregations  have  here  and  there  been  baptized  by  the  English 
missionary  Oncken,  of  Hamburg  (since  1834).  (,/*)    In  Denmark,  they  were 

tr)  A.  KZ.  1853.  N.  ITSsj. 

a)  I/ereoff,  rum.  Waldcnser.  p.  8338S. 

h)  W.  DleUrici,  d.  Wald.  u.  ibr  Verb.  z.  Preasa.  SUtt  Brl.  1S81.  Ifayerh4ff^  d.  W.  in  nnstn 
Tagen.  Brl.  1S84.  Fleck,  Eelsc.  vol  II,  1.  p.  Slsa.  [K  Henderson,  Tour  in  the  VEllejsof  PW- 
mont,  in  1844.  Lond  1845.  8.] 

c)  J.n.  JTtfiM,  d.  KVerf  d.  Ploni.  W.  ZQr.  1844.  Brl.  KZ.  184a  N.  21.  T7.  A.  KZ.  1858.  N.  ITSL 

d)  Fliedner,  CoUectenrelsc.  vol  I.  p.  188» 

e)  Rtcku*,  H.  of  tbe  English- American  Baptists  Boston,  1772-S4.  2  vo1&  [/>.  Doufftoi,  H  of 
Bapt  Churcbe?  in  tbe  North  of  Engl.  Lond.  1846.  8  ]  A.  F.  Cox  and  J.  Bahy,  (p.  608.)  Arebir.  £ 
KG.  vol  II  p.  576«a.    KHlst  Arohlv.  1824.  St  8.  Ev.  KZ.  1882.  N.  95. 1S89.  N.  91«. 

/)  Pupiknftr,  d.  neuer  K.  in  der  Schweiz.  St.  Gall-  1S84.  C.  GrSneUen,  Abrias  e.  Oesch.  4  rri. 
Gemcinschaften  in  WQrtcrab.  m.  bea.  B&ckSL  a.  d.  neuen  Tanfgesinnten.  (Zcltach.  t  hL<  Th.  1S4L 
H.  1.)  BrL  KZ.  1840.  N.  71 1841.  N.  79.  87. 1851.  N.  84.  8T. 


CHAP.  V.    EVANG.  CIIUBCII  TILL  1S58.    S  ^L  UNIT.    PLYMOUTH  BRETH.    611 

at  first  punished  by  fine  and  imprisonment ;  but  when  this  course  was  found 
to  be  inetfectnal,  they  were  allowed  to  liave  a  single  congregation  in  Froderi- 
cia  (1842).    It  was,  however,  found  impossible  to  confine  them  within  tliis 
limit.  ((/)      8.  As  Unitarian imi  could  be  propagated  simply  as  an  opinion,  it 
had  less  (ffccasion  to  be  extended  as  a  sect.     In  Transylvania,  the  Unitarians 
have  mainUdned  a  well  constructed  ecclesiastical  system,  and  have  developed 
their  views  in  consistency  with  their  supernaturalist  concessions.  (/<)    In  Eng- 
land they  lived  legally  subject  to  the  axe  of  the  executioner,  and  although  the 
laws  against  them  had  long  since  ceased  to  be  enforced,  even  in  1792,  Parliament 
refused  formally  to  abolish  the  statutes  against  them,  and  it  was  not  till  1813 
that  they  were  finally  tolerated  by  law.     LinfJfey  (d.  1808),  whose  gentle 
spirit  led  him  voluntarily  to  withdraw  from  a  congregation  connected  with 
the  Established  Church  (1773),  and  the  natural  philosopher  Priestley  founded 
a  few  Unitarian  congregations,  and  an  academy  for  free  theological  inquiry.(i) 
When  Priestley  was  obliged  to  retire  to  America  before  the  storm  of  the  pop- 
ular will  (1794),  he  there  encountered  every  kind  of  opposition.    But  after 
his  death  (1804),  a  kind  of  Rationalism  began  to  spread  in  opposition  to  the 
prevalent  sentiment  of  the  people  there,  and  found  a  peculiarly  favorable 
home  in  the  general  isolation  and  freedom  of  the  churches.    Several  hundred 
congregations  among  the  Independents  and  Baptists  have  embraced  it,  and 
for  some  time  it  has  had  tlie  ascendency  in  the  State  of  Massachusett*^.  (h) 
In  England,  the  greater  part  of  the  Presbyterian  and  General  Baptist  congre- 
gations have  adopted  the  same  sentiments.     When  they  thus  denied  the  doc- 
trine of  a  Triune,  incarnate  God,  the  orthodox  Dissenters  maintained  that 
they  had  forfeited  their  right  to  all  ecclesiastical  property  derived  from  foun- 
dations estiiblished  for  the  promotion  of  the  Christian  faith.    This  view  was 
sustained  by  the  civil  courts,  and  many  congregations  were  deprived  of  their 
fonner  splendor  m  public  worship,  until  by  a  new  law  (Dissenters'  Chapel 
Bill,  1844),  which  gave  a  legal  title  to  such  as  had  enjoyed  immemorial  pos- 
session of  the  fund,  a  termination  was  given  to  this  scandal.  (/)     4.  The 
Plymouth  Brethreiiy  a  society  founded  by  Darby,  an  English  clergyman,  and 
propagated  from  Plymouth  to  the  Canton  of  Vaud  (1840),  felt  constrained  to 
abandon  the  Protc^^tant  Church,  on  the  ground  that  it  also  had  become  a 
Babylon,  but  they  remained  strictly  Calvinistic  in  doctrine,  and  were  diligent 
in  religious  labors.    Regarding  themselves  as  the  elect  children,  and  there- 
fore universally  the  priests  of  God,  they  relied  on  the  promise  of  our  Lord 
(Matth.  18,  20),  dispensed  with  a  regular  clergy,  and  in  small  domestic 
churches  waited  for  the  approaching  second  advent  of  Christ.  (///)      6.  A 


Q)  BrL  KZ.  134a  N.  9.  1846.  N.  18.  80.  1S47.  N.  12. 

h)  {G.  MarkoB^)  Bumma  Thcol.  anlv.  Fee.  rnltarios.  Claadiopoli,  1767.  Archiv  f.  KGoscb.  vol 
IV.  SL  1. 

I)  Th.  Bfl-sham^  Memoirs  of  Llndwy.  Lend.  1820.  Memoirs  of  J.  PrUntUy,  (by  htmitcif  and  hte 
»>n.)  I^)nd.  ISOCs.  2  vela.     W.  Turner^  Lives  of  Eminent  Unitarian^  Ix)nd.  \S40f*.  2  vo]\ 

*)  n'alcA,  nst  rel.  Oesch.  voL  V.  p.  175.  VII,  347m.  Archiv  t  KG.  vol.  I.  p.  88.  IV,  149m.  Ev. 
KZ.  ISm  N.  13.  1881.  N.  40. 

0  J.  March,  IIIsL  of  the  Trcs.  and  Oon.  Baptist  Churches  in  the  West  of  Engl.  Lond.  1835.  JT. 
A.  Crfti7ter,  ItJrchl.  Zustinde.  (Heldlb.  Jahrb.  1845.  H.  1.) 

m)  J.  J.  IlertoQ,  les  Fr^Tes  de  Plymouth  et  John  Darby.  Lauji.  1845.  Ev.  KZ.  1844.  N.  28.  28. 
Bri  KZ.  1S51.  N.  90.    [C  F.  Leopold,  in  the  Stud.  n.  KriL  184S.  H.  4.] 


612  MODERN  CHUliCn  lIISTOliY.    PEP*,  YL    A.  D.  1WS-13M. 

romonco  founded  on  the  story  that  the  ten  tribes  of  Israel  had  been  driven 
to  America,  and  been  converted  under  the  personal  ministry  of  our  Lord 
there,  was  turned  into  a  holy  book  whioli  Joseph  Smith  (b.  1805)  claimed  to 
have  discovered  by  revelation,  and  found  to  be  an  historical  record  by  Mor- 
mon, an  old  prophet  among  that  people.  Professing  to  be  himself  dn  inspired 
prophet,  ho  collected  around  him  an  active  host,  which  were  driven  from  a 
number  of  places,  but  at  last  commenced  the  erection  of  a  city  and  a  splen- 
did temple  in  the  State  of  Illinois.  Their  pious  claims  upon  the  property  of 
their  neighbors  soon  armed  a  multitude  of  fanatics  against  them,  by  whom 
their  temple  was  destroyed  and  their  prophet  was  slain  (1844).  During  two 
subsequent  years,  and  in  the  midst  of  indescribable  troubles,  the  Muruwrn 
went  through  the  wilderness  and  across  the  Rocky  Mountains  to  the  great 
ocean,  and  founded  on  the  Salt  Lake  (Utah  Territory)  a  city  and  a  flourisliing 
state,  which  is  preparing  to  take  its  place  under  the  starry  banner  of  the  United 
States.  From  this  point  their  messengers  are  going  forth,  full  of  faith  in  old 
and  new  i)rophecies,  into  all  parts  of  the  world,  to  baptize  the  Latter- Day- 
Saints  and  to  assemble  them  in  their  new  Zion  on  the  Salt  Lake.  Their 
Catechism  has  an  evangelical  and  almost  an  orthodox  tone  ;  they  take  some 
pains  to  deny  the  limited  polygamy  which  is  practised  among  them,  and  theii 
comnmnity  of  goods  is  limited  to  one  tenth  of  all  property  and  annual  rents, 
to  be  used  for  objects  of  common  utility.  The  purpose  of  their  theocratic 
government  is  to  establish  a  firm  social  and  military  system,  and  it  offers 
those  who  have  come  to  them,  especially  from  Scotland  and  Scandinavia,  the 
prospect  at  least  of  a  temporal  kingdom.  (//) 

§  465.     Mmionary  amJ  Bible  Societies. 

The  ordinary  Annual  Reports  c5ii.  of  the  London,  Eilinbur^b,  Basic,  Halle,  and  Berlin  Bible  So- 
cieties. For  a  Gen.  Vit-w:  Knapp,  Abrisa  e.  prot.  Missionsji^fscl).  (HalL  Jahre>b.  ISld  SL  66.) 
ForUchrlttc  d.  cv.  Mi»lon.sw.  im  1.  Viertel  d.  VJ.  Jahrh.  Ba».  IS'ift.  F.  I.uckfy  MU»lonflstndieiL 
Gott.  1S41.  F.  W.  Klumpp^  d.  cv.  Mi^sionsnesen,  k  Meltgtrsch.  u.  nation.  Bedeut.  Stuttc  IWl.  J. 
Wiggers^  (\y.  510.)  J.  11.  H'-aue.r,  d.  Miwionswcsen  d.  ev.  K.  Statistlk.  Hainb.  lS47-d1.  L  vol  1.  *i  H. 
A".  J.  NitoHch,  d.  Wirk.  (L  ev.  Chr.  auf  kulturlofee  Volkcr.  Brl.  lSft2.  Contp.  Wi9fmann^  d.  Un- 
fhichtbark.  d.  v.  Protestanten  untcrnoininen.  Mtas.  Augsb.  1S85.— «/i  Ovcen^  IIl^L  of  tlie  Grig,  and  first 
ten  years  of  the  Bible  Soc,  Lond.  1^16.  8  voK  Lps.  lS2i.  Archlv.  t  KG.  vol.  IL  pi  «9ml  IIL  171» 
A.  KZ.  1925.  N.  128.  TS28.  N.  25.  lS>y.  N.  Sfl.  [F.  Schobert,  Present  State  of  ChrUUanity,  and  of  Um 
Mi<^  £.<ablishiuent&  Lond.  182S.  VI.  J.  0.  ChouUa,  Hist  of  Missions  Bost<in,  ISSS.  8  vob.  R  R 
EiluHirdfu  Miss.  Gazetteer.  Bost  l^'.Vl.  12.  C.  WillUtma,  Miss.  Gar.  Lond.  1S2S.  12,  J.  Tracy,  IL  of 
the  Am.  Board.  Boston,  1S8S.  12.] 

In  the  spirit  of  the  present  age,  which  accomplishes  great  enterprises  bj 
means  of  private  voluntiiry  associations,  the  extension  of  Christianity  has 
become  a  popular  cause,  lioards  for  missionary  societies,  each  of  which  is 
peculiar  and  distinct  in  its  character,  were  organized  at  London  in  1795,  (a) 
at  Edinburgh  in  1796,  at  Boston  in  1810,  at  Basle  in  1816,  (b)  at  New  York 

n)  Book  of  Mormon.  Book  of  Covenants.  The  former  work  has  been  several  times  printed  dacf 
1880,  even  in  German.  Pratt,  e.  Siinime  d.  Warnung  a.  Belch,  t  alle  V6Iker.  fW>m  the  EngL  Hamk 
1858.— 7^m<r,  Mormonism  in  all  A^es.  N.  York.  1S43.  CaetccU^  The  Tropbetof  the  1W»  Oal 
Lond.  1842.  Raunur,  (p.  601.)  vol.  II.  p.  154ss.  BrL  KZ.  1S51.  N.  69. 1852.  N.  100. 1858.  N.  6L  4t  4S. 
A.  KZ.  1858.  N.  Sss. 

a)  W.  EUU,  Hist  of  the  Lond.  Miss.  Soc.  Lond.  1844  vol.  1 

h)  W.  Hqffmann,  £ilf  Jahre  in  d.  Miss.  Stuttg.  1S58. 


CHAP.  V.    EVANO.  CHURCH  TILL  1868.    §465.  MISS.  A  BIBLE  BOCIErifc::^.    613 

in  1820,  at  Berlin  in  1823,  at  Barmen  in  1828,  and  at  Dresden  in  1836. 
Wherever  Protestants  were  found,  anxiliaries  to  these  societies  were  formed, 
and  about  ^ve  millions  of  dollars  are  annually  collected  for  the  education  and 
support  of  five  thousand  native  and  foreign  laborers  in  the  missions  of  nearly 
fifteen  hundred  stations  on  the  globe.  Every  party  in  the  Church,  especially 
in  England  and  America,  contributes  of  its  money  and  its  prayers,  under  the 
conviction  that  the  more  a  Christian  gives  for  objects  abroad,  the  more  he 
will  have  of  spiritual  blessings  in  his  own  heart.  The  English  missions  aim 
to  make  their  converts  thoroughly  English,  but  the  American  missionaries 
avow  that  they  wish  to  become  national  pastors,  wherever  they  may  be  sta- 
tioned. In  consequence  of  the  peculiar  organization  of  the  London  Society, 
it  was  obliged  to  confine  its  attention  to  the  simple  proclamation  of  Chri^- 
tianity,  and  to  leave  the  ecclesiastical  connection  to  be  determined  by  the 
converts,  or  rather  by  the  missionaries  them^•elve8.  The  Church  Missionary 
Society  recognized  indeed  only  the  system  of  Christian  Mth  professed  by  tl.o 
Epissoopal  Church,  but  it  employed  even  German  missionaries,  and  allowed 
them  to  manage  their  ecclesiastical  aftairs  in  their  own  way.  The  difficulties 
experienced  by  Rhenius  (d.  1838),  so  remarkable  for  his  powerful  faith,  and 
who  was  the  first  that  fell  out  with  the  society,  sprung  entirely  from  his  de- 
cided literary  tendencies,  (r)  The  North  German  Missionary  Society  (1836) 
was  much  endangered  by  its  controversy  about  the  Lutheran  and  the  Re- 
formed Confessions,  but  with  resi)ect  to  niissionarj'  operations  it  always  per- 
ceived the  necessity  of  a  union.  ('/)  The  missionary  societies  of  all  countries 
where  the  German  language  was  spoken,  were  united  (1846)  into  one  gen- 
end  body,  that  concert  in  missionary  operations  might  be  secured  by 
means  of  periodical  general  assemblies  and  a  central  Board,  whose  location 
might  be  changed  according  to  circumstances,  (e)  But  when  the  Dresden 
mission  was  transferred  to  Leipsic  (1847),  it  placed  itself  decidedly  on  the 
ground  of  the  Lutheran  Confession,  and  the  Bavarian  Lutherans  pronounced 
all  contributions  to  the  society  of  Nuremberg  sinful,  until  it  received  a 
Lutheran  name  and  character  (1862).  (/)  As  most  of  the  missions  were 
commenced  under  the  management  of  what  was  called  the  Methodistic  party 
and  the  Moravians,  it  was  found  that  none  but  those  of  a  kindred  spirit 
would  enter  heartily  into  the  work  of  conducting  them.  Gradually,  there- 
fore, a  certain  degree  of  coolness  with  regard  to  them  sprung  up  among  the 
Rationalists,  (ff)  Although  the  doctrines  of  many  of  the  missionaries  may 
have  reminded  one  more  of  the  Formula  of  Concord  than  of  the  gospel, 
there  were  certainly  some  missionaries,  tis  <•.  j/.,  those  who  proceeded  from 
the  school  of  the  sincere  Jacrdke  of  Berlin  (since  1800),  whose  virtues  and 
sacrifices  remind  us  of  apostolic  times.  (/<)     Not  only  ministers  with  a  regu- 

c)  Rh^mcaUi,  Kcp.  vol.  XXIV.  p.  ISIs*. 

d)  Report  of  the  Nordd.  Mi£s.  G.  Ilamb.  1889.  A.  KZ.  1647.  N.  152.  Allg.  Misslcmszeitung,  ed.  by 
Brawr^  Hamb.  1845^ 

<•)  Brl.  KZ.  1S4T.  N.  70. 

/)  L.  A.  Pftri,  d.  Miiv.  a.  d.  K.  Ilann.  1841.    X.  Graul,  d.  ev.  lath.  M.  zu  Dresden  an  die  latli 
K.  Lpa.  1345.   £v.  Inth.  Missionsb).  Dr.  a.  l.\>n.  s.  IfyMn. 

g)  Ruhr,  Pred.  BlbU  toL  XIL  H.  i.    NoUzenbl.  and  oft.   A,  KZ.  1880.  N.  88a. 
A)  £y.  KZ.  1881.  N.  9a 


614  MODERN  CnURCU  niSTOBY.    PER.  YL    A.  D.  164^18nL 

lar  education,  but  in  some  cases  mecbanics  of  an  elevated  religions  spirit, 
were  sent  fortb.  Tbeir  principal  influence  bas  been  exerted  bj  means  of 
popular  schools,  and  generally  none  bave  been  admitted  to  baptism  until 
tbeir  fidelity  has  been  proved. — When  the  Pietists  of  Halle  had  begun  (1712) 
to  provide  cheap  Bibles,  (0  this  attempt  to  supply  those  who  in  different 
places  were  found  destitute  of  the  word  of  God,  suggested  to  some  benevo- 
lent people  in  England  tlie  idea  of  supplying  every  nation  on  earth  with  the 
Holy  Scriptures  in  their  own  language.  The  British  and  Foreign  Bible  Society 
at  London  was  the  first  and  the  most  important  of  all  these  enterprisea.  The 
single  penny  of  the  poor  soon  became  a  million,  and  innumerable  Bibles  are 
now  distributed  in  more  than  a  hundred  languages.  That  the  whole  power 
of  all  parties  may  be  combined  for  the  accomplishment  of  this  object,  nothing 
is  printed  by  this  society  but  the  word  of  God,  in  a  faithful,  and,  when  it  is 
possible,  in  an  ecclesiastical  translation,  without  note  or  comment.  The  rela- 
tions of  the  English  society  to  foreign  societies  were  disturbed  by  its  resolu- 
tion to  withdraw  from  all  co-operation  in  the  circulation  of  the  Apocrj-pha 
(1827) ;  but  althougli  the  difficulty  was  nearly  settled  by  mutual  conces- 
sions, (I)  it  was  made  the  subject  of  controversy  in  the  orthodox  party  in 
Germany,  because  those  who  maintained  the  divine  authority  of  the  Scrip- 
tures were  against,  while  those  who  regarded  them  as  merely  traditionary 
records  were  in  favor  of  the  Apocrypha,  and  the  practical  interest  might 
therefore  be  so  explained  as  to  be  on  either  side.  (/)  The  proposition  in  Lon- 
don, to  banish  from  the  society  all  who  did  not  believe  in  a  Triune  God,  was 
voted  down  with  great  unanimity  (1831),  but  its  advocates  withdrew,  and 
formed  a  separate  society,  (m) 

§  466.    Spread  of  ChrUtianity, 

In  consequence  of  the  revolutionary  wars  in  the  south  of  Europe  and 
America,  the  dominion  of  the  seas  had  fallen  into  the  hands  of  Protestant  pow- 
ers, and  all  the  shores  of  the  earth  were  open  to  their  missions.  Hence, 
when  peace  was  concluded,  the  gospel  was  proclaimed  in  all  parts  of  tLe 
world  with  more  power  than  ever  before,  and  with  a  powerfnl  popular  sym- 
pathy in  its  favor.  In  the  South  Sea  Inlands,  even  among  the  milder  tribes, 
Christianity  had  to  contend  with  the  most  licentious  practices,  and  the  terri- 
ble sanctity  of  the  Tabu.  At  Tahiti,  the  dissenting  missionaries,  since  1797, 
never  despaired  even  in  the  most  hopeless  seasons,  and  have  finally  obtained 
possession  of  the  native  children.  King  Pomare  II.  learned  to  read  and 
write ;  an  insurrection  in  favor  of  the  old  religion  was  quelled  after  a  san- 
guinary struggle  (Nov.  12th,  1815),  and  the  magic  work  of  the  first  printing 
press  was  hailed  (1817)  with  the  most  joyful  anticipations.  At  the  Sand- 
wich Islands,  king  Riho-riho  had  already  destroyed  the  old  gods  when  the 
American  missionaries  first  landed  on  his  shores  (1820).  {a)  Since  that  time, 
most  of  the  Society  and  Sandwich  Islands,  as  they  could  not  escape  the  vices 


0  A.  If.  XUmeyer,  Gescb.  d.  Canstein,  Blbelanst  Hal  1827.     *)  A.  KZ.  182T.  N.  12. 1S30.  X.  «* 
0  IJrl.  KZ.  lSft3.  N.  43.         m)  Ev.  KZ.  1881.  N.  688. 1882,  N.  84  95. 

a)  E.  ProtU,  Mem.  of  tho  Life  of  J.  Williams.  Lond.  1848.     W.  J.  Be—er,  J.  W.  d.  Ap-wUl  <L 
8fidi«ee.  Brl.  2  ed.  1847. 


CHAP.  Y.    EVANO.  OHUBCH  TILL  1858.    $466.  EAST  INDIES.  615 

of  civilization,  Lave  accepted  also  of  the  virtues  of  a  Puritanic  form  of 
Christianity,  and  submitted  themselves  to  the  theocratic  government  of  the 
missionaries ;  (h)  but  the  English  missionaries  have  been  driven  from  the 
Marquesas,  and  the  evangelical  churches  of  Tahiti  have  been  wasted  by 
French  ships  of  war  with  Catholic  priests  (since  1842).  (c)  The  old  land  of 
wonders,  the  land  of  Bralima,  had  now  become  subject  to  the  merchants  of 
England.  The  East  India  Company  has  sometimes  favored  Brahminism  be- 
cause it  believed  that  the  security  of  its  dominion  might  be  promoted  by  the 
jealousies  of  the  Brahmins  and  tlie  Mussulmen.  But  public  opinion  in  Eng- 
land demanded  that  the  government  should  act  in  consistency  with  the 
Christian  religion,  and  accordingly,  in  1829,  the  suttees  ceased  to  receive  the 
protection  of  the  laws,  and  in  1831,  all  offices  open  to  any  natives  were  made 
free  to  Christian  Hindoos.  The  system  of  caste  still  presents  very  groat 
obstacles;  the  manner  in  which  the  Brahmins  have  been  educated  enables 
them  to  propose  objections  (d)  which  an  uneducated  missionary  finds  it  hard 
to  answer ;  the  number  of  converts  is  small,  and  the  missionaries^  native 
helpers  have  very  little  influence  with  those  whom  they  have  forsaken.  The 
Anglican  Church  is  tlie  only  body  which  has  laid  the  basis  of  an  external 
polity  there.  The  diocese  of  Calcutta  has  been  established  (1815),  and  the 
suffragans  of  Bombay  and  Madras  have  been  since  attached  to  it  (1833). 
But  the  foundations  of  the  old  temples  have  been  powerfully  shaken  by  the 
quiet  influence  of  Christian  dominion  and  improvements,  by  the  schools,  a 
free  press,  and  trials  by  jury.  In  the  promotion  of  these  objects,  Bishop 
ffeber  (d.  182C)  8[)ent  the  brief  day  of  his  administration  in  his  immense  dio- 
cese laboring  principally  for  the  Christian  education  of  the  people,  {e)  Bishop 
WiUon  has  declared  all  distinctions  of  caste  abolished  among  such  as  profess 
the  Christian  religion  (1838),  since  the  gospel  has  placed  all  men  of  every 
nation  and  condition  on  the  same  footing.  (/)  On  the  other  hand,  the  great 
Rammohiui'Iioy  (1780-1833),  in  possession  of  the  treasures  of  Indian  and 
Christian  learning,  has  proclaimed  that  the  purely  moral  worship  of  the  one 


V)  E.  TT.  Lnh-n^  G.  d.  Rel.  d.  Polyncsier,  a  d.  TapnlSnder.  (Zeitsih.  f.  Iiht  Th.  1S42.  II.  4.)— a  r. 
KoUehxu^  Reise  urn  d.  Wflt  Weiin.  1830.  (/?<iAr,  Pr.  Blbl.  vol.  X.  11.  5.  XII,  4.  XIII,  5.)  To  be 
modified  by:  AV/m,  Polynesian  KoPt-archca.  I^)nd.  1S80.  2  vol*.  (Kv.  KZ.  1S8«).  N.  SOsa.)  [N.  York. 
1981.  2  voK]  F.  Krohn.  d  Missionsweson  d.  Sftdsec.  limb.  1833.  J.  WiUiairut,  Narrative  of  Mias. 
Enterprises  In  the  South  Sea  L&lands.  Lond.  1S87.  C.  E.  JfrhiUi'e,  d.  Sudsoevolker  il  d.  Chrlstenth. 
PrenzL  1S44.     //.  Wegener^  Gescti.  d.  chr.  K.  a.  d.  Oc8ell.«icbafl»-Arcliip<*L  Brl.  1344.  vol.  I. 

e,  If.  Lutt«roth^  Oescb.  d.  I.  Tahiti,  u.  ihrer  Bcftitznahme  durcli  d.  Franzoscn.  from  the  Fr.  by  Briins. 
BrL  1S43.  W.  F.  Benaer^  d.  Miswionfir  u.  s.  Lolin.  (from  Pritchard^  The  Missionary's  Reward  LoncL 
1S44.)  Hal.  1S46.— £1  Mickaelia,  d.  VOlker  d.  Sudsee  u.  Gesch.  d.  prot  u.  kath.  Mi8.\  unter  dens. 
Muuet.  1S47. 

d)  An  Aj)ology  for  IIcalhenL'Oii,  and  Controversial  Treatises  against  Clirlstianity,  by  a  Brahmin. 
Translated,  wltli  notes  by  Bp.  Wilson.  Bombay,  1832.  (Mitgeth.  v.  Poret  In  Stud.  u.  Krlt  1853. 
IL  2.) 

t)  Buchanan,  nst  Unters.  u.  d.  Zust  d.  ChrlRten  in  Aj'ien.  A.  d.  E.  Stuttg.  1S13.  [Ghrlrtian  Re- 
■earcheft  In  Asia.  Lond.  ISll.  8.  and  oft.]  Xiemeyer^  neuere  Gesch.  d.  ev.  Miss,  in  Ostind.  (Hal. 
l>id<».  St.  77.)  Ifeber,  Journal.  Lond.  1S26.  2  vols.  4.  Life  of  Heber.  Lond.  1880.  2  vols.  4.  United 
In:  Krohn,  Hebers  Lebcn  u.  Nachrr.  u.  Ind.  Brl.  1831.  2  vola.  J.  Hough,  Hbt  of  Christ  in  India. 
Lond.  1889-45.  4  vols.  Die  £ntw.  d.  chr.  Miss,  in  Ostind  (Baa.  Mag.  184L  II.  1.  2.  4.  1842.  H.  1.  8s. 
l&ta  II.  1s8l  1844  H.  2a.  1845.  U.  2.)  J.  J.  Weitbrecht,  d.  prot.  Mlsai  in  Ind.  m.  bes.  RQcks.  a.  Ben- 
l^en.  Heldlb.  1844. 

/)  £t.  KZ,  1884L  N.  788. 


616  MODERN  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER  VL    A.  D.  1MS-1808L 

God  is  merely  the  restoration  of  original  Brahminism,  and  that  this  doctrine 
constitntes  the  unity  of  that  system  with  the  essential  principles  of  the  gos- 
pel. Oz)  At  Malacca,  a  Christian  school  was  opened  for  the  education  of  the 
Chinese  residing  there,  and  Morrison  (d.  1844)  translated  the  Scriptnres  for 
their  use.  English  cannons  have  compelled  the  Celestial  Empire  to  open  its 
gates  for  the  reception  of  the  gospel  as  well  as  opium  (1842),  and  the  Hessian 
Missionary  Society  has  avowed  its  special  interest  in  the  conversion  of  China. 
Giitzlaff  (1808-51),  born  a  missionary,  and  trained  in  the  school  of  Jaenike, 
in  the  full  costume  of  a  native,  and  sometimes  in  connection  with  English 
merchants,  has  penetrate<l  with  some  violence  into  the  interior  of  China 
(since  1881).  At  first  he  was  obliged  to  communicate  Christianity  to  the 
Chinese  only  in  a  manuscript  form,  but  after  a  time  he  succeeded  in  sending 
forth  in  every  direction  a  large  number  of  native  preachers  from  the  Anglo- 
Chinese  seminary,  which  has  been  removed  from  Macao  to  Hong-Kong,  and 
finally,  as  a  friend  of  China,  has  pleaded  its  cause  in  the  different  countries 
of  Germany,  (h)  The  insurrection  created  by  the  new  Son  of  Heaven 
(Tien-ti),  has  already  destroyed  the  idols  (since  1852),  threatens  to  over- 
throw the  Tartar  dynasty,  and  has  adopted  many  ideas  peculiar  to  Christian- 
ity. (?)  Missions  of  all  denominations  have  been  established  among  the 
colonies  on  the  coast  of  Southern  Africa^  where,  in  consequence  of  the  rev- 
erence which  the  negro  generally  feels  for  the  white  man,  the  difficulty  has 
been  not  so  much  with  the  decided  opposition  as  with  the  indifference  of  a 
stupid  barbarism.  The  Rhenish  Missionary  Society  looks  with  pious  expec- 
tations to  the  miniature  likeness  of  its  own  native  valley  in  the  Wupperthal 
belonging  to  the  Colony  of  the  Cape,  but  when  the  Hottentots  rose  against 
the  white  men  (since  1850),  they  forgot  their  catechism.  At  Sierra  Leone  has 
been  formed  the  germ  of  freedom  and  of  Christianity  (since  181 C),  at  an 
expeni^  of  millions  of  money,  but  it  is  continually  threatened  by  a  most 
noxious  climate.  (X)  To  secure  the  benefits  of  European  civilization  for  his 
subjects,  King  Radama  allowed  Christianity  to  be  freely  Introduced  into 
Madagascar  (since  1818).  The  queen  who  succeeded  him,  however,  com- 
manded her  subjects  to  think  no  more  of  the  new  doctrine ;  the  missionaries 
abandoned  the  island  (1886),  and  the  native  Christians  wore  impaled  alive, 


g)  Translatiun  of  several  principal  b(K>kB  of  the  Ycds.  cd  2.  Lond.  1882.  Appeal  to  CbrisdaDa^ 
Calcutta,  1S2(K  2  vols.  Correspondence  relative  to  the  prospect  of  the  reception  of  Christ  in  IndU. 
Lond.  1S24.  A.  KZ.  1S24.  N.  43.  Gesch.  d.  ev.  Mias.  Hal.  188T.  St  88.  p.  956&  [Christ  Enm- 
incr,  Sept  an<i  Oct  1S26.  Spirit  of  the  Pilgrims,  vol.  II.  p.  2708S.  North  Aroer.  Review.  voL 
XX.  p.  398sa] 

h)  W.  If.  Jfedhurst,  China,  Its  State  and  Prospects.  Lond.  1388.  Freely  revised.  Btnttg.  ISia- 
Gutzlaff,  Sketch  of  Chinese  Hist,  Anc.  and  Mod.  N.  York.  1840.  2  vols.  11— (T  Guldtiff,  Journal  of 
Three  Voyages  along  tlie  Coast  of  China.  N.  York,  1S83.  Lond.  1884.  (Ev.  KZ.  188a  N.  5«.  1884.  N. 
798S.)  Galhan's  (Gutzl.)  chin.  Borichte.  1841^6.  ed.  by  the  chin.  StlAong.  1850.  A.  KZ.  184&  N. 
181.  1*^7.  N.  148.  1S50.  N.  2n288.  1851.  N.  40.  » 

0  Boitrr.  z.  Kunde  Chinas  in  Bez.  a.  d.  Mi8&  ed.  by  JT.  Z.  A'«nuiteH,  Cass.  1858.  roL  L  E  1 
A.  KZ.  lS5a  N.  180. 

k)  {0.  V.  Gerlach;)  Gesch.  d.  ev.  Miss.  !m  sttdl.  Afr.  BrL  1882.  (T.  and  a  Rep.  of  the  Berl  Sot) 
Reports  of  the  KhcniMi  Miss.  Soc.  Barm.  1880sa.  Hist  of  the  avillzation  and  Christianlxatioo  of 
Southern  Af^.  Edinb.  ISSO.  Some  circulars  sent  from  South  Afr.  to  Bishop  Neuder,  ed.  by  G.  OebcL 
Hamb.  1S40. 


CHAP.  VL    OATH.  GHUBCH  TILL  1853.    |4«7.  PIUS  VIL    CONSALVL        617 

bnt  Chriatianity  was  by  no  means  extinguished.  (I)  The  remnants  of  the 
aboriginal  tribes  of  North  America  betook  themselves  to  the  deeper  shades 
of  their  primitive  forests ;  and  although  some  of  them  acknowledged  the 
God  of  the  whites,  others  replied  to  the  solicitations  of  the  missionaries,  that 
they  had  previously  lived  happily  under  the  protection  of  the  Great  Spirit, 
and  that  what  they  had  witnessed  in  their  white  brethren  had  only  made 
them  doubt  the  expediency  of  any  change. — About  sixty-five  millions  of 
people  are  at  present  adherents  of  the  Evangelical  Church. 


CHAP.  VL— THE  ROMAN  CATHOLIC  CIILTlCn  UNTIL  1858. 

§  467.      Re-e9tahlishment  of  the  Roman  Ilierarchy.      Cont.  from  §  439. 

With  the  restoration  of  the  Bourbons,  a  party  bound  together  by  the 
most  intimate  relations,  and  ramified  in  a  great  variety  of  forms,  became  dif- 
fused in  all  parts  of  Southern  Europe,  and  formed  a  secret  connection  until 
1830  with  the  apostolical  congregation  as  the  nucleus  of  all  their  operations. 
The  object  of  this  party  was  to  obliterate  all  vestiges  of  the  Revolution,  and 
under  the  name  of  the  absolute  monarchic  system,  once  more  to  divide  the 
world  between  the  Priests  and  the  Barons.  Their  watchword,  tliat  the  altar 
cannot  full  without  the  throne,  and  the  terrible  experience  of  the  few  past 
years  was  suflScient  to  draw  toward  them  the  hearts  of  the  princes.  The 
result  was,  that  the  state  received  an  ecclesiastical,  and  the  Church  a  politi- 
cal element.  By  this  dangerous  connection,  the  hierarchy  obtained  many 
unexpected  concessions,  but  the  Church  was  involved  in  all  the  changes  of 
the  i)olitical  system,  and  its  true  power  was  much  impaired.  And  yet  the 
newly-awakened  religious  zeal  which  now  took  possession  of  the  leading 
spirits  of  the  age,  sometimes  the  result  of  enthusiasm,  and  at  other  times  of 
deliberate  purpose,  was  beneficial  to  the  cause  of  Catholicism,  and  raised  up 
many  a  dilapidated  and  fallen  pillar  for  its  support.  Plus  VII.  once  more 
entered  his  capital  (May  24th,  1814),  which,  having  been  reduced  to  a  mere 
French  provincial  town,  now  received  him  with  acclamations,  {a)  The 
Ecclesiastical  States  had  their  former  limits  assigned  them  by  the  Congress 
of  Vienna,  with  the  exception  of  a  small  district  beyond  the  Po.  The  pro- 
vinces beyond  the  Apennines  were  exposed  to  the  rapacity  of  Auntria,  now 
the  dominant  power  in  Italy.  The  Diplomatists  of  Vienna  smiled  when 
Consalvi  solemnly  protested  against  the  dismembennent  of  the  country  on 
the  Po,  the  Austrian  occupation  of  the  castle  of  Ferrara,  the  refusal  to  sur- 
render Avignon,  and  the  secularization  and  dissolution  of  the  German  em- 
pire, {h)  The  nations  heard  with  amazement  that  the  pope  had  pronounced 
the  Bible  Society  a  pestilence  (1817).  (r)  The  bull  Sollicitudo  Omnium  (Aug. 
7th,  1814),  in  compliance  with  what  it  called  the  almost  unanimous  entreaty 

/)  EUi»^  H.  of  Madiu^.  Lond  1S8S.  2  vols.  (Ev.  KZ.  1S89.  N.  15«s.)    BrL  KZ.  ISAl.  N.  29.    Fdd' 
ner^  d.  Kv.  a.  Madag.  Konig^b.  l!^. 

a)  Pueca,  Memorie.  Orv.  1883.  vol.  V.  Angsb.  1884  vol.  V. 

b)  Kl&ber,  Acten  d.  Wiener  Congr.  vol.  IV.  p.  825.  VI.  44180. 

e)  Wakt,  DecreU,  qaib.  socieU.  blbL  ■.  P.  R.  damnantur.  Reg.  1818. 


618  MODKBN  CHUBCH  HISTORY.    PER.  YL    A.  D.  1M8-18ML 

of  Christendom,  restored  the  order  of  the  Jesnits  througbont  the  world. 
Nowhere,  except  in  the  Ecclesiastical  States,  however,  was  it  able  to  regain 
possession  of  any  portion  of  its  former  property ;  hot  it  received  from  the 
former  society  an  inheritance  of  suspicion  and  hatred,  which  its  members 
sought  to  remove  from  the  popular  mind  by  a  course  of  strict  morality  and 
mannei*s.  In  Naples,  Belgium,  Ireland,  and  in  most  of  the  American  States, 
they  were  tolerated  ;  in  Sardinia,  they  were  richly  endowed,  and  intrusted 
with  the  education  of  the  youth ;  and  in  some  of  the  cantons  of  Switzerland 
they  erected  edifices  for  instruction,  which  were  resorted  to  by  many  chil- 
dren of  tlie  French  and  Genuan  nobility.  Austria,  after  a  protracted  refu- 
sal, opened  a  few  of  her  provinces  to  them  (after  1836).  They  were  excluded 
from  Russia  for  their  abuse  of  confidence  (1820).  (d)  As  they  became,  under 
General  Itoothaan^  after  1820,  more  and  more  decidedly  the  prominent  cham- 
pions against  all  freedom  both  in  Church  and  State,  not  indeed  from  any 
warmth  of  natural  character,  but  by  cold  calculation  and  untiring  diligence, 
their  intrusion  into  the  western  states  of  Europe  depended  upon  their  uncer- 
tain victory  over  liberal  institutions,  (e)  Every  condition  which  they  had 
desired  in  behalf  of  the  new  order  of  things  in  the  Church,  had  been  con- 
ceded to  them  by  the  Roman  court,  and  by  the  governments  of  Turin  (1814, 
1817)  and  Naples  (1818),  since  every  limitation  of  the  hierarchy  was  sus- 
pected in  those  countries  as  a  democratic  element.  (/)  Every  ecclesiastical 
measure  indicated  that  it  was  the  design  to  bring  all  things  back  to  the  con- 
dition in  which  they  were  before  the  time  of  Clement  XIV.  In  the  civil 
administration,  Consalvi  endeavored  to  strike  out  a  middle  way  between  the 
hierarchical  and  liberal  parties.  A  Motu-Proprio  of  July  6,  1816,  confirmed 
the  legal  equality  of  all  citizens,  just  as  it  had  been  introduced  by  the  French 
when  they  abolished  all  municipal  and  provincial  privileges.  But  when  the 
French  cede  had  been  abolished,  nothing  was  substituted  in  its  place ;  the 
prelates  once  more  seized  upon  all  the  civil  offices,  the  privileged  classes  were 
opposed  to  a  re-establishment  of  the  financial  system,  and  even  robbers  col- 
lected annuities.  It  may  therefore  with  propriety  be  said,  that  there  was  no 
security  for  the  government  but  in  the  pious  recoUections  of  the  people, 
and  in  the  proper  management  of  the  confessional,  {g)  After  experiencing 
such  extreme  vicissitudes  of  fortune,  Pius  VII.  died  (Aug.  21,  1828),  his  last 
days  having  been  beclouded  by  the  burning  of  St  Paul's  church,  and  the 
threatened  approach  of  a  new  revolution.  (7t)  Although  he  was  a  theologiao, 
his  education  was  by  no  means  extensive ;  he  had  no  great  confidence  in  his 
own  abilities,  displayed  great  powers  of  endurance,  and  his  countenance  was 
that  of  a  saint,  and  an  image  of  a  noble  soul. 

d)  Vatffr,  AnUu.  toL  II.  p.  898&  KHist  Arcbiv.  1828.  T.  2.  p.  2tew     Wetienrieder,  ft.  d.  Wie- 

derh.  d.  Jei.  ISIS.  Cretineau^oly,  Qefch.  d.  Oeaellsch.  J.  from  the  French.  Vienna  ld456&  6  Tolfl^- 
n.  Luttei'oth,  la  Riissio  et  Ics  Jesultes.  Par.  1S44.  iL  v.  Birch,  Stuttf.  lS46w 

€)  Das  lunere  d.  Gescllscb.  Jean.  LpA.  1$U5.  Der  Jesi  O.  u.  8.  UnvertrSglichk.  m.  d.  deatscbco 
Verb.  Stuttg.  ISIQ. 

/)  Orig.  Docc.  in  Vatcr'a  Anbau.  vol.  I.  p.  flSea.  14l8s. 

g)  Tournon,  Etudes  statisiiquea  hur  Cume.  Par.  1631.  L,  Ranke^  Rom.  1815-28^  (Hist  poL 
Zeitscbr.  1S32.  P.  4.) 

A)  P.  Bul<J(i9Hitri,  Kelazionc  delle  aversiU  g  patimentl  del  P.  Plo  YIL  negU  nltinil  trt  anni  id 
tno  pODtit  od.  2.  Bolog.  184a 


CHAP.  VL    CATU.  CHURCH  TILL  185a    §468.LEOXIL    GBEOORT  XVL     619 

§  468.     The  Popes  he/ore  the  Lnnt. 

(ATitt*',)  Kom  itn  J  188a  Stuttg.  1684.  E.  Mvnch,  Ri'in.  Zu^tAnde  n.  KirchcnIVasren  d.  neaesten 
Zoit  Stuttg.  1S8S.  (//.  Rfuchlin,)  Bildor  o.  Sklzzcn  a.  Rom.  Stuttg.  1844—^.  G.  K(V,erlf :  Roin  nnter 
den  letzten  drd  Papaton,  u.  d.  zvrdte  Ref.  in  D«>utschl.  Lp«.  1846.  8  voli.— A rtautl  dA  JlonUir,  Hist 
da  P.  Leon  XII.  Par.  1S48.  revl<e<l  by  Ch.  &heffr,  Schaffh.  1844.— <lu  P.  Pli*  VIII.  Par.  1844.— Aus 
d.  Lel)en  P.  Greg.  XVI.  Vion.  1831.  4.    Bernh,  Wajner,  P.  Greg.  XVI.  Snkb.  1846. 

Leo  XIL  (della  Genga,  Sept.  28tli,  1823-Feb.  10th,  1829),  wlio  belonged 
to  the  party  opposed  to  Consnlvi's  libernl  policy,  endeavored  to  regulate  the 
nfFairs  of  the  Church  beyond  the  Alps  and  the  ocean,  and  to  supply  it  with 
bishops  distinguished  for  piety  and  science.  He  also  improved  the  system  of 
education  in  the  Ecclesiastical  States,  canonized  the  Minorite  Julianus,  who 
had  ordered  fried  birds  to  fly  away,  ('/)  and  appointed  the  year  of  Jubilee  to 
be  a  season  of  general  expiation  and  grace,  in  which  believers  from  all  parts 
of  the  earth  might  come  up  to  the  metropolis  of  the  world,  to  thank  God 
for  the  victory  which  had  been  obtained  over  the  gi*eat  conspiracy  of  this 
century  against  all  human  and  divine  rights,  and  to  pray  for  the  extermina- 
tion of  heretics.  (/>)  lie  had  not  been  distinguished  for  his  abstemiousness  in 
Germany,  where  he  had  resided  as  a  nuncio,  but  when  he  became  pope  he 
was  extremely  temperate.  On  his  accession,  he  was  received  at  Rome  with 
great  rejoicings,  but  at  his  death  he  was  hated  for  his  strictness  and  indepen- 
dence, not  only  by  the  officials  of  hb  court  and  the  cardinals,  but  by  the 
people.  Pirn  VllL  (Castiglioni,  March  31st,  1829-yov.  30th,  1830),  a 
favorite  of  his  predecessor  of  the  same  name,  a  sickly,  benevolent  old  man, 
and  always  afraid  of  the  machinations  of  the  philosophers,  the  Bible  socie- 
ties, and  the  Carbonari,  (c)  put  forth  his  last  and  best  energies  to  confer  bless- 
ings on  his  city  and  the  world.  The  longings  of  the  Italians  generally  after 
national  independence  and  a  popalar  constitution,  had  become  powerful  espe- 
cially in  the  EcclesLvstical  States,  quite  as  much  in  consequence  of  the  decided 
opposition  made  to  them,  as  of  the  weakness  of  the  government.  Even  dar- 
ing the  session  of  the  conclave,  an  insurrection  became  formidable,  and  deter- 
mined the  vote  in  favor  of  Capellari  von  Belluno,  the  General  of  the  Camal- 
dolites,  Grefjory  XVI.  (Feb.  2,  1831-June  1,  1846),  who  had  once  celebrated 
the  triumph  of  the  holy  see  over  the  assaults  of  these  innovators.  (</)  The 
insurrection,  relying  upon  the  aid  of  France,  broke  out  in  the  Legations, 
extended  beyond  the  Marcjuisate  of  Ancona,  and  finally  reached  Rome,  where 
its  object  was  to  compel  the  pope  to  abdicate  his  temporal  sovereignty. 
From  this  he  was  preserved  by  the  uiterference  of  Austria.  He  however 
paid  only  an  apparent  attention  to  the  admonition  of  the  European  powers, 
to  conform  his  administration  to  the  spirit  of  the  age.  The  rebellion  had 
been  indeed  suppressed,  but  was  by  no  means  radically  exterminated,  and 
hence  it  was  soon  awakened  to  new  activity  (Jan.,  1832).  The  troops  sent 
forth  to  quell  it,  being  wholly  composed  of  banditti  and  criminals,  ravaged 
peaceable  towns  and  sacred  spots,  until  finally  it  bec4ime  necessary  to  call  io 
the  Austrian  military  to  rescue  the  papal  government  and  its  territory  from 


a)  A.  KZ.  1825.  N.  70.         h)  Ibid.  1824.  N.  88^ 

c)  Kii^enschmid,  rittn.  Bnllar.  Lpa.  1881.  vol.  II.  p.  809s(V. 

Trionfo  della  SadU  Sede.  Rom.  1799.  Ven.  1882,  and  oft  Aogsb.  1888. 


620  MODERN  CnUBOH  HISTORY.    PER.  YL    A.  D.  16IS-1S{ML 

its  own  soldiery.  To  prevent  Austria  from  obtaining  complete  sovereignty 
over  Italy,  tlio  French  fleet  took  possession  of  Ancona  by  a  single  blow  (Feb. 
23,  1832).  The  Roman  court  protested  against  this  violation  of  national 
law,  (le'-larcd  the  city  of  Ancona  under  an  interdict,  and  thus  Anally  availed 
itself  of  the  weak  side  which  necessity  offered.  There  was  no  denying  that 
the  deficit  in  the  revenues  was  annually  increasing.  An  attempt  to  intro- 
duce a  new  code  of  civil  law  was  defeated  by  the  opposition  of  the  provinces. 
Ancona  wns  given  up  by  the  French  and  Bologna  by  the  Anstrians  simul- 
taneously, Dec.  8d,  1838.  Tlie  Legations  were  disturbed  by  an  almost  per- 
petual guerilla  war  during  the  years  1848-44.  {e)  The  inhabitants  of  Rimini 
(Sept.,  1845)  demanded  with  anns  in  their  hands,  since  every  other  form  of 
petition  and  complaint  was  denied  them,  the  very  moderate  concession  of  the 
legal  forms  of  a  civilized  state.  The  Swiss  regiments  and  a  fanatical  band  of 
papal  volunteers  stifled  this  insurrection  in  blood,  and  a  great  part  of  the  edu- 
cated Roman  youth  sighed  in  prisons,  or  in  the  mere  possession  of  life  in  foreign 
lands.  The  pastoral  epistle  of  Gregory  (Aug.  15,  1832)  is  full  of  expressions 
indicating  that  the  author  was  conscious  tliat  the  Roman  Church  stood  on 
the  brink  of  an  abyss,  and  that  it  could  be  saved  only  by  the  Arm  union  of 
all  true  believers  in  opposition  to  modem  science  and  popular  freedom,  but 
that  his  unshaken  reliance  rested  upon  the  protection  of  the  Holy  Virgin.  (/) 
Gregory  lived  to  witness,  on  the  other  side  of  the  Alps,  both  defeats  and 
triumphs,  but  he  seemed  always  to  understand  with  firm  moderation  what 
the  papacy  miglit  according  to  circumstances  demand  or  endure  from  others. 
The  festival  of  the  canonization  of  five  saints  (May  26th,  1889),  was  a  cele- 
bration of  victoi^  and  a  season  of  excitement,  (if)  Gregory  lived,  according 
to  his  own  convictions  of  duty,  the  abstemious  life  of  a  cloister,  or  at  least 
under  all  the  restraints  of  a  monkish  spirit,  but  he  could  not  control  the  ava- 
rice of  his  subordinate  courtiers ;  he  had  no  confidence  in  his  people,  and 
therefore  put  himself  under  the  counsels  of  a  gloomy  party ;  and  he  finaDy 
left  his  personal  servants  and  his  nepotcs  rich,  the  country  impoverished,  and 
the  government  distracted. 

§  469.    PiitM  IX.  {June  16,  1846)  and  Italy. 

Pfafl  IX.  n.  B.  Refi>nnen.  Lps^  1647.  H.  StUglit*^  Erinn.  an  Rom.  n.  d.  KStut  Im  eraten  Jabr.  sr. 
Ycij&nf.  Lpe.  1648.  Curci,  d.  Paptt  als  Staateoberb.  u.  d.  D^magogie,  fhmi  tbe  ItaL  ot  Rt.  JToy, 
Iuj«b.  1S49.  Fil.  di  Boni,  Pio  dodo.  Torina  1850.  Die  QcgeQwart  Lpa.  1849s8.  vol  III.  p.  149,  fiOlMi 
vol.  VII.  p.  45sa. 

The  election  was  for  some  time  undecided  between  the  Genoese,  Lambrus- 
chini,  who  had  been  the  real  ruler  during  the  last  years  of  Gregory ^s  reign, 
and  Mastai  Feretti  (b.  1792),  of  Sinigaglia,  once  a  resident  in  Chili,  and  when 
a  prelate  much  interested  in  the  establishment  for  the  poor,  and  a  father  to 
all  orphans.  The  influence  of  the  Roman  nobility  to  which  he  belonged,  and 
the  perilous  condition  of  the  ecclesiastical  government,  finally  determined  the 
choice  of  the  conclave  on  the  second  evening,  in  favor  of  Feretti.  Piu»  iX 
was  regarded  by  his  intimate  acquaintances  as  the  friend  of  moderate  progress, 


e)  A.  Z.  184S.  K.  280.         /)  A.  KZ.  1881  N.  ISSs. 

g)  A.  KZ.  188i».  N.  101.    Rbeinw.  Rep.  roL  XXYL  p.  91ssl 


CHAP.  VL    CATIL  CIIURCII  TILL  1SS8.    S  «^-  PIUS  IX.    OIOBEUTL  62 1 

bat  his  raind  was  raised  to  a  consciousness  of  a  divine  vocation  to  be  the  re- 
former and  deliverer  of  the  Ecclesiastical  States  by  the  enthusiasm  of  the  Ro- 
man people  in  his  behalf,  and  the  opposition  he  had  to  encounter.  His  popu- 
lar manners  won  the  hearts  of  the  people  even  when  his  reforms  appeared  to 
them  too  tardy  and  incomplete.  An  amnesty  for  all  who  had  been  imprisoned 
or  exiled  for  political  offences  was  merely  in  accordance  with  what  had  now 
become  estabhshed  usage  on  the  accession  of  a  new  pope,  but  he  pronounced 
the  word  of  grace  with  so  much  cordiajity  and  good-natured  confidence 
(July  17)  that  an  act  which  brought  such  consolation  to  thousands  of  families 
filled  all  Italy  with  joy.  (a)  lie  commenced  his  retrenchments  in  his  own 
household,  allowed  the  press  to  indulge  in  a  much  greater  liberty,  strength- 
ene<l  the  commissions  previously  appointed  for  digesting  a  code  of  laws  and 
forms  of  judicial  proceedings  by  the  addition  of  approved  men,  granted  per- 
mission for  the  construction  of  railroads,  opened  to  the  laity  the  path  to  the 
higher  ci\'il  offices,  decided  upon  a  general  taxation  of  all  convents  in  the 
Ecclesiastical  States,  gave  a  liberal  municipal  constitution  especially  to  the 
dty  of  Rome,  invited  men  from  the  provinces  in  whom  the  public  liad  con- 
fidence, to  his  council  of  state,  entered  upon  negotiations  for  the  dismission 
of  tlie  Swiss  troops,  and  took  initiatory  steps  for  a  confederation  of  the  Itidian 
states.  Ilis  kind  intentions  with  respect  to  the  Jewish  quarters  in  the  city 
were  frustrated  by  the  opposition  of  the  Christian  population,  (b)  A  portion 
of  the  clergy  sincerely  ranged  themselves  on  the  side  of  the  pope,  his  elo- 
quent preacher,  Ventura,  proclaimed  that  genuine  Catholic  piety  must  neces- 
sarily become  reconciled  with  political  freedom,  (c)  and  even  the  Jesuits  de- 
clared themselves  the  friends  of  progress.  But  so  numerous  were  the  injuries 
committed,  and  threats  received  by  those  who  lived  upon  abuses,  and  espe 
cially  by  those  who  had  formerly  sustained,  offices  (la  setta  Gregoriana),  and 
80  complete  was  the  change  of  position  from  that  which  the  modern  papacy 
had  hitherto  occupied  with  respect  to  the  politicid  parties,  that  an  open  and 
a  secret  opposition  to  this  '*  devouring  genu  and  chief  of  young  Italy  "  was 
unavoidably  called  forth.  (</)  As  there  were  two  political  powers  on  the  op- 
posite confines  of  the  Ecclesiastical  states  threatening  his  government,  because 
they  were  threatened  by  the  spirit  emanating  from  it,  thw  opposition  formed 
a  coalition  with  them.  To  overcome  this  whicli  was  magnified  by  the  popu- 
lar imagination  until  it  assumed  the  character  of  a  murderous  conspiracy, 
Pius  ventured  to  place  w^eapons  in  the  hands  of  the  citizens  (guardia  civica, 
July  5,  1847).  (e)  By  this  act  he  placed  himself  at  the  head  of  the  Italian 
national  movement,  and  was  obliged  earnestly  to  protest  against  the  Austrian 
occupation  of  Ferrara,  and  he  seemed  actuiUly  to  be,  what  the  learned  Abbot 
Qiohirti  had  dreamed  that  the  papacy  might  become,  the  head  of  an  luilian 
confederacy  of  princes,  for  the  unity,  national  independence,  and  civil  liberty 
of  Italy ;  and  by  reconciling  faith  with  intellectual  improvements,  the  peaceful 
umpire  among  the  nations,  holding  up  the  cross  as  the  standard  of  freedom.  (/) 


a)  D.  A.  Z.  1S46.  N.  220.       b)  IbitL  1S47.  N.  195. 
c)  EIo^o  funebre  dl  Doniello  O'Connell.  Roma  1847. 
(0  I>.  A.  Zu  1846.  N.  297.  800.       e)  Ibid.  1847.  N.  199.  2^S. 

/)  Prlmato  morale  e  civile  degli  ItallanL  Par.  1843.  Dellu  condizionl  presente  e  fUtare  (I'ltal  I^oii' 
dn  1848.     Comix.  J.  F.  X^igehaur  d.  Papst  u.  a.  R«lch.  Lpa.  1847. 


622  MODERN  Ci:rRCH  HISTORY.    PER.  VI.    A.  D.  l«4»-186aL 

His  position  with  respect  to  the  Church  was  strictly  Catholic.  When  he 
came  before  the  public  his  appearance  was  thoroughly  sacerdotal,  and  ho 
made  even  the  pnlpit  subservient  to  his  designs,  (g)  His  pastoral  epistle 
(Nov.  9,  1846)  was  an  echo  of  that  of  Gregory,  only  his  complaints  respect- 
ing the  press  and  popular  freedom  were  confined  to  those  books  which  tempted 
men  to  sin,  and  to  what  he  called  communism,  (h)  His  personal  inquiries 
into  the  condition  of  convents  and  hospitals,  his  circulars  to  the  generals  of 
the  orders  (June  17,  1847),  and  the  commissions  appointed  with  reference  to 
the  convent««,  were  intended  to  re-establish  the  canonical  regulations,  and  to 
bring  the  monastic  life  to  its  former  flourishing  state,  by  enlisting  it  in  pious 
offices  and  learned  labors,  {i)  All  the  Italian  states  had  caught  the  spirit  pro- 
ceeding from  Rome,  when  the  French  revolution  gave  free  scope  to  all  the 
hopes  and  passions  of  the  nations.  In  spite  of  the  opposition  of  his  conscience, 
the  pope  yielded  to  the  importunities  of  his  people  by  giving  them  a  constitu- 
tion, providing  for  two  chambers,  one  chosen  by  himself,  and  the  other  by 
the  people,  but  reserving  for  his  inviolable  authority  all  matters  relating  to 
the  Catholic  faith  and  to  morals  (March  14,  1848),  (k)  and  by  appointing  for 
his  minister  a  layman  who  had  just  returned  from  exile.  Gioberti  accused 
the  Je»:uits  of  being  the  authors  of  all  the  distress  and  disgrace  to  be  found  in 
Catholic  nations.  (/)  They  were  generally  driven  from  the  streets  by  the 
people,  and  although  the  pope  steadily  refused  again  to  abolish  the  order,  he 
was  obliged  to  witness  their  expulsion  from  the  Ecclesiastical  States.  When 
Lombardy  rose  against  the  Austrian  dominion,  and  Charles  Albert,  the  sword 
of  Italy,  to  gain  the  Lombard  crown  put  himself  at  the  head  of  the  insurrec- 
tion, Pius  refused  to  take  any  part  in  the  national  war.  In  spite  of  his  dis- 
approbation, however,  12,000  modern  crusaders  (crociati)  went  forth  to  a 
holy  war,  in  which  they  found  neither  wounds  nor  honor.  The  pope  de- 
clared that  the  Father  of  Christendom  should  never  participate  in  a  war  be- 
tween brethren  belonging  to  Catholic  nations,  and  ho  allowed  the  Austrians 
to  enter  Bologna,  and  the  people  there  to  defend  themselves  as  they  could. 
Since  tlien,  the  people  who  had  so  often  sung  hosannas  before  him,  forsook 
him,  and  the  republican  party  under  Mnzzini^  which  at  that  time  aimed  at  an 
indivisible  republic  of  all  Italy,  under  the  presidency  of  the  pope,  came  into 
power.  (?«)  In  Lombardy  national  independence,  and  in  Naples  civil  liberty, 
wore  overthrown  by  cannons  ;  in  Rome  a  club  (circolo  popolare),  and  in  the 
provinces  unrestrained  licentiousness,  bore  rule,  when  Count  Bossi,  once  a 
professor  in  Bologna  and  a  fugitive  because  ho  had  hoped  for  the  freedom  of 
Italy,  and  afterwards  an  ambassador  of  Louis  Philippe  in  Rome,  undertook 
the  ministry,  and  held  the  parties  under  his  firm  control.  He  was  assassi- 
nated (Nov.  15,  1848)  while  ascending  the  steps  conducting  to  the  Chamber 
of  Deputies,  and  on  the  next  day  the  people  demanded  a  democratic  minis- 


Q)  I).  A.  Z.  1847.  N.  25.    Comp.  N.  140. 

?i)  Die  Erwartuugen  d.  kath.  Christen!),  im  19.  Jahrb.  t.  b.  Stable.  Z&r.  1817. 
t)  Brl.  KZ.  1847.  N.  67.  69.        k)  Ibid.  1548.  N.  87. 
I)  II  Gosuita  mtidorno.  Cosanna.  l!M7.  S  vols. 

m)  La  Gio\  iDc  Italia.  1832.  88.    De  Tltalie  dans  sea  rapports  areo  la  Ubert6  et  la  ci\iUMtioo  mo^ 
denitf.  Lp&  1846.  8  vols. 


CHAP.  VL    CATH.  CHURCH  TILL  1858.    %  469.  ANTONELLI.    SICCARDI.      623 

try,  a  constituent  national  assembly  for  the  Ecclesiastical  States  and  for 
Italy,  and  a  participation  in  the  national  war.  The  pope  besieged  and  at- 
tacked with  cannon  in  the  Quirinal,  finally  yielded  with  a  heavy  heart,  was 
guarded  as  a  prisoner,  and  escaped  into  the  Neapolitan  territories  (Nov.  25). 
A  provisional  government  ordered  that  the  constituent  national  assembly 
should  be  chosen  by  the  popular  voice,  and  although  the  pope  at  Gaeta  ex- 
commnnicited  all  who  should  take  any  part  in  the  matter,  the  people  elected 
their  deputies,  and  the  National  Assembly  on  the  night  of  Fob.  9,  1849, 
decreed  that  the  temporal  sovereignty  of  the  pope  was  at  an  end,  that  the 
government  of  the  Roman  state  should  henceforth  be  a  pure  democracy,  and 
that  the  Supreme  Pontitf  should  receive  full  security  for  his  independence  in 
the  exercise  of  his  spiritual  powers.  All  ecclesiastical  possessions  were  de- 
clared the  property  of  the  nation  (Feb.  18),  to  be  distributed  on  perpetual 
leases.  But  the  European  powers  offered  their  assistance  to  the  holy  father, 
the  French  Republic  anticipated  even  Austria,  a  French  army  under  the 
appellation  of  allies  of  the  Roman  republic,  after  an  heroic  defence  by  the 
people,  entered  the  city  of  Rome  (July  8),  and  an  Austrian  army  took  pos- 
session of  the  Legations,  (n)  A  committee  of  cardinals  by  order  of  the  pope 
undertook  the  government  (July  15),  and  began  the  work  of  vengeance.  The 
pope  promised  (Sept.  12)  some  municipal  and  provincial  limitations  to  the 
absolute  authority  restored  to  the  priests,  but  the  amnesty  which  he  pro- 
claimed was  so  full  of  exceptions  that  it  gave  opportunity  for  all  kinds  of 
persecution.  When  Pius  IX.  finally  returned  to  Rome  (April  12,  1850)  his 
heart  was  embittered,  the  patriotic  ideals  he  had  once  formed  were  broken, 
and  the  people  received  him  in  gloomy  silence.  His  sovereignty,  under  the 
able  management  of  Cardinal  Antonelli,  his  Secretary  of  State,  is  sustained 
entirely  by  French  and  Austrian  garrisons.  As  an  ecclesiastical  prince  his 
feelings  may  have  been  touched  during  his  restoration,  but  he  received  from 
Tuscany  a  Concordat  full  of  concessions  to  the  ecclesiastical  authorities,  (o) 
he  has  issued  jubilee  indulgences,  (p)  he  has  encouraged  the  Catholic  world  in 
the  hope  that  the  immaculate  conception  of  the  Virgin  Mary  to  whoso  pow- 
erful protection  he  ascribes  his  deliverance,  will  soon  be  established,  (//)  and  he 
has  once  more  committed  to  the  Jesuits  the  business  of  public  education,  (r) 
In  Piedmont  alone  the  Jesuits  are  excluded,  not  only  by  the  people  but  by 
the  king  (March  8,  1848).  Here,  where  Gioberti  himself  in  difficult  times 
stood  at  the  head  of  the  ministry,  they  could  not  be  received,  for  the  suc- 
cessor of  Charles  Albert,  in  harmony  with  the  educated  portion  of  the  na- 
tion, adheres  firmly  to  the  free  development  of  the  state  as  their  best  conso- 
lation for  misfortunes  in  the  battle-field.  (*)  To  carry  out  the  article  of  the 
constitution  which  j)rovides  for  the  equality  of  all  citizens  before  the  law, 
and  for  the  independence  of  the  state  upon  the  clergy,  the  laws  proposed  by 
Siccardi^  the  minister  of  justice,  and  accepted  by  the  chambers,  abolished 
the  ecclesiastical  jurisdiction  of  the  clergy  in  civil  and  criminal  causes,  and 

ft)  C.  Rifconi^  la  repablica  Romana  del  1349.  Tor.  1850. 

o)  A,  KZ.  l&fil.  N.  120.       p\  BrL  KZ.  1852.  N.  28.       q)  Ibid,  1S49.  N.  87. 1S50.  N.  47. 

r)  ibid.  1860.  N.  12. 

$)  F.  CHtger,  d.  Konigr.  Sardin.  (Gegenw.  1853.  toL  YIIL  jx.  BMol) 


624  MODERN  CnU.BCU  HISTORY.    PER.  YL    A.  D.  1648-1866. 

their  control  over  cliari table  establishments,  abrogated  the  right  of  asylum, 
and  gave  some  reason  to  expect  tliat  marriages  by  a  civil  act  would  be  recog- 
nized as  valid,  (t)  Franzoni,,  Archbishop  of  Tusin,  whose  pastoral  epistle 
complained  of  these  laws  as  sacrilegious,  was  summoned  before  the  civil 
cuurt^  and  on  his  refusal  to  appear  ho  was  imprisoned  and  condemned  to  per- 
petoal  exile  for  resisting  the  law  of  the  state,  and  for  exciting  others  to  rebel- 
lion against  the  civil  authorities  (Sept.  1860).  (w)  Pius  IX.  extolled  his  martyr- 
dom, and  protested  against  a  legislation  in  conflict  with  legal  concordats,  and 
the  subversion  of  the  sacred  rights  of  the  Church,  (v)  The  government  replied 
that  concordats  were  not  international  treaties  between  independent  powers, 
but  concessions  made  by  the  state  to  its  own  established  Church,  and  there- 
fore so  far  as  related  to  its  own  department,  might  be  revoked  by  a  legislative 
act.  As  the  Roman  court  persisted  in  its  established  policy  of  resisting  in 
one  country  as  a  violation  of  the  inalienable  rights  of  the  Church  as  long  as 
any  hope  of  success  rouiained,  what  in  another  country  had  become  law  by 
the  force  of  circumstances,  the  only  point  on  which  the  two  parties  could 
come  to  any  agreement  was  witli  respect  to  a  diminution  of  the  number  of 
festivals.  The  masses  of  the  people  in  ditl'erent  places  were  kept  in  an  un- 
hapi)y  state  of  excitement  against  the  government  by  the  perpetual  clamor 
of  the  clerical  party  under  the  direction  of  Franzoni  from  his  place  of  exile, 
against  the  laws  of  Siccardi,  against  the  civil  marriages,  under  which  all  births 
were  declared  to  bo  illegitimate,  against  the  courts  which  took  any  action 
against  priests,  and  which  were  immediately  excommunic4ited,  against  lay 
professors  in  the  university,  against  even  clergymen  who  ventured  to  obey 
the  government,  and  against  the  whole  process  by  which  they  declared  that 
the  state  was  to  be  Protestantized  and  unchristianized.  The  king  himself 
was  threatened  with  excomumnication,  and  the  Church  with  a  division,  (mj) 
The  state,  on  the  other  hand,  is  continually  holding  forth  its  signals  of  free- 
dom in  a  seductive  manner,  and  whenever  a  revolution  tlireatens  Italy,  to 
which  Giohcrti  (d.  1852)  has  bequeathed  the  lessons  and  the  hopes  to  be 
gathered  from  her  not  altogether  undeserved  misfortunes,  (i) 

§  470.     The  Gallican  Church. 

1.  The  Charter  with  which  LouU  XVIII,  entered  the  land  of  his  fathers, 
recognized  Catholicism  as  the  religion  of  the  state,  but  guarantied  to  every 
form  of  public  worship  the  protection  of  the  government.  The  priests  who 
accompanied  him,  the  martyrs  of  the  Revolution,  had  become  by  long  absence 
estranged  from  the  people  and  the  spirit  of  tlie  age,  and  now,  while  they 
demanded  the  proper  reward  of  their  fidelity,  they  promised  to  secure  the 
throne  of  their  sovereign,  and  to  regenerate  their  country.  The  youth  who 
had  grown  up  in  the  midst  of  the  revolutionary  heathenism  stood  in  need  of 
the  gospel,  the  people  longed  for  the  blessings  of  the  Church,  even  polite 
usage  regarded  all  ridicule  of  religion  as  disreputable,  and  De  Lamartint^  at 


0  Brl  KZ.  ISSn.  N.  3:).        «)  D.  A.  Z.  1850.  N.  22(1  24(1 

«)  BrL  KZ.  1S50.  N.  89.  51.  04. 

to)  Brl.  KZ.  1851.  N.  41.  66. 103.  Utet  pol.  Bll.  1860.  voL  XXYL  H.  e*. 

cp)  Del  rinnovamento  civile  dllAlia.  Par.  1S61.  8  Tola. 


CHAP.  YL    OATH.  CnUBCH  TILL  1868.     S'^Ta  FRANCE.    CHARLES  X.       625 

that  time  still  a  knight  devoted  to  royalty,  succeeded  hy  the  pious  sadness  of 
his  harmonies  in  becoming  the  favorite  poet  of  the  liigher  classes,  (a)  De 
Lamennais  (b.  1781)  defended  the  doctrine  of  the  absolute  necessity  of  an 
infallible  Church  as  the  objective  manifestation  of  the  divine  reason  in  oppo- 
sition to  the  frenzy  of  this  individual  reason  of  man,  contrasted  his  own 
glowing  feelings  of  love  and  hatred  with  the  indilference  which  prevailed 
around  him,  and  in  his  honesty  did  not  conceal  his  position  that  he  regarded 
the  theocratic  right  of  the  papacy  as  superior  to  the  foundation  on  which  the 
monarchy  rested,  (b)  Count  de  Maistre  (d.  1821)  proved  that  infallibility 
belonged  as  necessarily  to  the  pope  as  sovereignty  to  the  king,  (c)  But  the 
clergy,  instead  of  endeavoring  to  reconcile  the  discrepancies  of  the  past  with 
the  present,  seemed  determined  to  render  both  more  prominent.  Religious 
enthusiasm  once  more  beheld  the  cross  of  Constantine  in  the  sky,  and  intoler- 
ance founded  a  kingdom  of  its  own  in  the  name  of  God.  Priests  of  the  mis- 
sion traversed  the  land  in  great  pomp,  contending  not  only  for  the  faith,  but 
in  opposition  to  every  thing  which  Franco  had  purchased  at  such  prodigious 
sacrifices,  (d)  The  principles  of  freedom  which  formerly  prevailed  in  the 
Gallican  Church  were  now  inveighed  against  as  heresies.  The  apostolic  con- 
gregation in  connection  with  the  heir-apparent  and  the  illustrious  daughter 
of  misfortune,  by  persevering  obstinacy,  and  in  opposition  to  the  inclinations 
of  the  prudent  king,  obtained  a  Concordat  (1817)  by  which  the  Concordat  of 
1801  was  revoked,  and  that  of  1516  was  substituted  for  it.  So  decidedly  was 
public  opinion  expressed  in  0]>position  to  this  ghost  of  former  times  that  no 
one  ever  ventured  to  lay  a  plan  of  the  law  before  the  Chamber  of  Deputies,  (e) 
Without  the  consent  of  the  Chambers,  however,  the  government  did  as 
much  for  the  clergy  as  was  in  its  power.  But  no  sooner  had  the  Cathedral 
of  Rheims  witnessed  once  more  a  royal  coronation,  for  which  even  the  Holy 
Chrism  was  once  more  found  (p.  166),  than  the  hierarchy  received  from  the 
chambers  a  pledge  of  its  victory  in  the  law  against  sacrilege  (1825),  which, 
in  the  true  spirit  of  the  middle  ages,  threatened  with  terrible  punishments 
every  injury  done  to  the  Established  Church.  (/)  Once  more,  however,  the 
government  listened  to  the  demands  of  the  popular  will  expressed  even  iu  the 
Uouse  of  Peers,  and  a  royal  ordinance  (June  16th,  1828)  closed  the  schools 
against  the  Jesuits  who  had  intruded  into  them  in  the  character  of  fathers  of 
the  faith,  (g)  But  Charles  X,  allowed  himself  to  be  hurried  into  violent 
measures,  for  which  he  was  obliged  to  atone  by  tlie  loss  of  his  throne  (1830), 
2.  Instead  of  a  king  anointed  and  appointed  by  God,  a  citizen-king  was  now 


«)  Meditat  poet  Tar.  1S20.    normonies  po«t  et  rel  Par.  1880. 2  voU 

I)  E«5ai  8ur  rindiffcrenco  en  niaticro  de  la  rol.  Par.  ISlTa.  cd.  4  1822.  4  voIa.  Dufenae  do  TEfiaaL 
Par.  1$21.  De  la  rel  dans  868  rapixirts  avec  I'ordre  politique.  Par.  1525.  ed.  3. 1S2G.  Dea  progrus  de 
la  rev.  et  de  la  gaerre  coutre  Tegl.  Par.  1S29. 

c)  Do  Pa|)c.  Par.  1820. 

d)  Die  Hicr.  a.  Ibre  llundesgen.  in  Fr.  Aar.  1923.  Coap-d'oetl  aur  la  altnalion  actaelle  •!  lea  vrain 
Intert-ta  de  IVd.  fr.  Par.  1S25.    Carori,  Kol.  u.  PhlL  In  Fr.  OiitL  1S2C 

e)  De  Prudt,  lea  qiiatre  Cone  Par.  1819.  vol  III.  (Archlv.  t  KOesch.  vol.  IV.  p.  S79aa.) 
/)  A.  K.  Z.  1925.  N.  82.  44.    Du  Loiret,  lliat  Ahrvgie  du  aacrilcge.  Par.  1825. 

g)  Montloteier^  Memolre  k  conitultcr  Biir  on  fTsteme  rel  et  poL  tendant  ik  renverscr  la  rel,  la  so- 
ciet^  et  le  tr:>ne.  Par.  1826.  With  Vorw.  by  Paaloa,  Stattg.  lS2e.  A.  K.  Z.  182e.  N.  189. 1827.  N.  80.— 
1828.  N.  104. 148. 174. 1829.  N.  9. 11. 

40 


626  MODERN  CUURCH  HISTORY.    PER  YL    A.  D.  16>IS-18{nL 

chosen  by  the  people.  The  Jesuits  and  Trappists  fled,  the  palace  of  the  arch- 
bishop, and  a  few  churches  in  Paris  which  had  been  used  for  political  purposes, 
were  stormed,  the  crosses  together  with  the  lilies  were  removed,  the  salaries 
of  the  prelates  were  diminished,  and  Catholicism  lost  the  prerogative  of  being 
the  religion  of  tlie  state.  (A)  But  an  intimation  from  the  pope  (i)  determined 
the  clergy  to  offer  their  prayers  for  the  new  kingdom,  although  their  minds 
were  ftill  of  rancor  toward  it  and  they  were  connected  by  many  pious  bonds 
with  the  family  of  the  exiled  king.  Louis  Philippe  made  as  great  concessions 
to  the  hierarchy  as  the  origin  of  his  own  authority  would  allow,  that  a  moral 
basis  and  a  peaceable  form  might  be  given  to  his  own  dynasty.  The  Arch- 
bishop of  Paris,  ff.  de  Qu^len  (d.  1889),  an  honorable  priest  and  a  father  to 
the  poor,  ijc)  was  yet  willing  to  deny  Christian  burial  to  the  honest  Oregoire, 
who  died  immovably  faithful  to  his  ecclesiastical  character  (1831),  (I)  and 
the  Bishop  of  Clermont  refused  the  last  consolations  of  the  Church  (1838)  to 
the  Count  Montlmier^  who  had  once  heroically  defended  the  cross  of  Christ, 
but  had  appealed  to  the  laws  in  opposition  to  the  Jesuits,  (wi)  The  recollec- 
tions of  all  that  is  great  in  the  past  history  of  the  French  nation  stand  in 
striking  opposition  to  the  views  of  the  Church,  {n)  and  the  abyss  between 
Catholic  and  secular  France  is  daily  becoming  more  profound.  Lamennai*^ 
consistently  with  his  general  opinion  that  ecclesiastical  piety  is  to  be  valued 
above  every  thing  else,  perceived  the  compatibility  of  Catholicism  with  the 
sovereignty  of  the  people,  and  demanded  that  the  clerg}'  should  not  only  give 
up  all  their  salaries  but  all  interference  in  politic4il  matters,  and  so  be  once 
more  poor  and  free.  The  Journal  of  the  Future  (PAvenir,  1830s.)  was  pow- 
erful in  France  until  it  struck  upon  the  rock  of  a  contradiction  between  the 
freedom  of  the  mind  and  the  Roman  infallibility.  Lacordaire^  the  intelligent 
disciple  of  Lamennais,  submitted  himself  to  the  pastoral  epistle  of  Pope 
Gregory  (§  475),  became  a  mendicant  friar,  {o)  and  was  apj)arently  willing  to 
bring  the  sacrifice  of  obedience.  But  in  his  solitude  his  spirit  became  in- 
flamed, and  he  sent  forth  to  the  world  the  words  of  a  true  believer.  As 
Christianity  had  previously  been  abused  to  throw  a  sanctity  around  despot- 
ism, he  here  attempted  to  give  the  democratic  side  of  the  gospel  and  of  the 
theocracy,  that  he  might  in  anticipation  of  a  mighty  revolution,  announce  in 
prophetic  and  apocalyptic  imagery  the  overthrow  of  the  monarchy  and  the 
universal  equality  of  the  children  of  God.  But  even  this  revolutionary 
prophecy  is  pervaded  by  a  spirit  of  profound  and  sincere  piety.  (/>)  As  La- 
mennais  in  his  visions  of  the  dead  had  never  mentioned  the  name  of  the 


A)  A.  K.  Z.  1831.  N.  155. 1S82.  N.  87.  97. 167Mt 

€)  After  Ro*eU,  Cbronlque  de  JuUlct :  Minerva.  1883.    Apr.  p.  SSas. 

I:)  Rlicinw.  Rep.  1841.  Tol.  XXXIII.  p.  98sa. 

I)  Chr.  Antiroinanns,  d.  sterb.  Greg.  u.  d.  verd.  Erzb.  Neust  1881.    Kr&g€r^  (p.  S80)  p.  8T3«. 

m)  A.  Z.  1889.  N.  854.  Append.  N.  692.  889.  N.  2. 

n)  Knnstblatt  1S87.  N.  99.    AcU  hbL  eco.  1887.  p.  67. 

o)  Lacordaire^  Mumoire  pour  lo  retablissement  en  France  de  Tordre  des  fr^res  prechcun  Ptf. 
188&  Augsb.  1589. 

p)  rarolcs  d  un  croyant  Par.  1888.  (In  the  Bmneb  pirated  inapresalon,  1834. 12.  also  Baotain, 
d^EcIcstein  &  &ainte-Bouve.)  Bantain^  Response  d  un  chr^tien  auz  paroles  d*QQ  croyant  StrasK  1SU 
Baumffarten-CruHtu,  Betracht  (L  einlge  Scbrlften  y.  de  la  Menn.  Jen.  1884^  [Artiela  in  Hcf0 
Chr.  Instmetor,  in  Eclectic  Mag.  for  Oct  185a  p.  860aB.] 


CHAP.  Vt    CATH.  CHURCH  TILL  1858.    %  470.  LAMENNAI8.    CHATEL.        627 

pope,  80  in  his  rejection  of  the  "  Words  of  a  Believer  "  (June  25,  1884),  the 
pope  never  used  the  name  of  Lamennais,  but  as  a  sorrowing  father  spoke  of 
the  man  whom  France  once  esteemed  as  the  last  of  the  ecclesiastical  fathers. 
Bnt  Laraennais  found  himself  urged  on  to  a  position  in  which  he  saw  the 
pontificate  with  its  antiquated  claims  on  the  one  side,  and  the  human  race 
with  its  ever  fresh  religious  energies  upon  the  other,  (q)  Instead  of  the 
Church  he  has  put  the  universal  reason  of  man,  and  instead  of  the  propitiatory 
death  at  Golgotha,  an  oblation  of  the  deity  commensurate  with  the  ithi- 
verse.  (r)  He  has  been  declared  by  the  civil  courts  guilty  of  attempts  to 
excite  hatred  and  contempt  with  respect  to  the  royal  government  (1840),  (*) 
but  he  has  now  been  abandoned  by  free  as  well  as  by  Catholic  France.  After 
an  attempt  to  revive  the  sect  of  the  Theophilanthropists  by  a  decree  which 
numbers  the  years  from  the  time  of  the  martyrdom  of  Socrates,  the  Abb6 
Chaiel  i)reached  (Aug.  1830)  in  the  spirit  of  an  extravagant  liberalism  a 
French  Catholic  Church.  In  consequence  of  the  strong  dislike  felt  by  the 
great  body  of  the  people  for  the  Romish  hierarchy,  a  few  congregations  were 
collected  together  with  this  view  ;  but  the  modern,  useless,  political  and  nega- 
tive character  of  this  system  made  it  soon  dwindle  away,  and  the  doors  of  its 
advocates  were  finally  closed  by  the  police  (1842).  {i)  In  the  spirit  of  the 
new  monarchy,  Ovizot^  an  earnest  Protestant  literary  man,  once  more  estab- 
lished a  plan  of  national  education,  in  which  a  system  of  schools  was  carried 
out  (1888),  except  that  no  one  ventured  to  introduce  into  it  the  education  of 
the  clerg}',  nor  to  assert  the  universal  obligation  of  attendance  on  the  schools. 
He  also  proposed  that  France  should  become  the  protexstor  of  Catholicism  in 
every  part  of  the  world,  though  without  prejudice  to  the  freedom  of  religion 
under  it  The  clergy  demanded  as  the  price  of  their  reconciliation,  the  free- 
dom of  education,  i.  e.,  liberty  to  control  it.  The  University,  which  had  the 
general  direction  of  this  whole  business,  was  described  by  them  as  the  Mo- 
loch to  whose  antichristian  instruction  the  youth  of  France  were  sacrificed,  (u) 
When  the  two  parties  had  measured  their  relative  strength  by  a  discussion  in 
the  Chamber  upon  instruction  in  the  gymnasium  (1844),  they  did  not  venture 
to  come  to  a  vote  on  the  law  relating  to  it.  (r)  A  few  bishops  threatened  to 
deprive  some  obnoxious  institutions  of  the  blessing  and  countenance  of  the 
Church.  On  the  other  hand,  the  old  system  of  Jesuit  morality  which  had 
been  used  for  the  instruction  of  the  clergy,  made  up  as  it  was  of  ambiguities 


q)  Affaires  dc  Rome,  Par.  1S36.  Le  livre  da  peuple.  Par.  1S3S.  12.  Le  pays  ct  le  Rouvcrncment. 
Par.  ISIO. 

r)  EMjiilMe  d'ane  Phllosoplilc.  Par.  1841.  8%'oIa.  Par.  A  Lpa.  1841.  8  vola.— Am»clMM«paiidn  ot  Dar- 
▼andfl.  Par.  1S43.    Ijes  Evangilc&  Par.  184^. 

«)  BrI.  K.  Z.  1841.  N.  11. 

0  Unl  Deo.  A.  K.  Z.  1829.  N.  208.— Profession  de  foi  de  Vtgl  calh.  fran raise.  Par.  1881.  Catc- 
chlsme  k  I'usajfe  de  lYgl.  cath.  ft-.  Par.  1887.  li^uchlin,  p.  29868.  IfoUapfd,  d.  K.  de  AbW  Chatel. 
(Zeitschr.  C  hist  Th.  1844.  P.  8.) 

II)  Code  UnivcrslUIre  ou  loi*  et  rrplemens  de  I'UnlversltA  do  Franco.  Par.  1585.  jyianz,  p.  n». 
118.  Reui-'hlin^  p.  SCsi*.  BrL  A.  K.  Z.  lS4a  N.  62,—DftigarfiA,  le  Monopolc  aniversltalre.  de«tructoDr 
de  la  rel.  et  des  loK  ou  la  Charte  et  la  llbertt^  de  Tenselgnement  Lyon.  1848.  Vidrin^^  simple  ooap 
d*oel1  siir  les  doalours  et  les  esp^rances  do  Fegl.  aaz  prises  avec  Ics  tyrans  des  confdenoes  et  les  vicea 
da  XIX.  Steele.  Lyon.  1843. 

o)  (C  Reuii)  Rec  d.  betr.  Scbrr.  io  d.  Jen.  L.  Z.  1846w  N.  86-10. 


628  MODERN  CHXJBCH  IIISTOBT.    FEB.  VL    A.  D.  1648-1988. 

and  obscenity,  was  again  brought  to  public  notice.    MicheUt^  to  whom  all  the 
dreams  of  the  middle  ages  were  quite  familiar,  and  Quinet^  who  regarded 
everj  authorized  creed  as  a  direct  promise  on  the  part  of  all  who  profess  it, 
sent  forth  ft-om  their  Mount  St.  Genevieve  to  the  whole  French  nation  in  op- 
position to  the  Jesuits  who  had  now  become  more  numerous  than  under  the 
Restoration,  full  pictures  of  all  that  these  fathers  had  done  for  the  destruction 
of  freedom,  and  of  what  other  nations  had  become  under  their  influence.  (?«) 
When  Thiers  caUed  up  in  the  Chamber  of  Deputies  the  laws  still  in  existence 
jigainst  the  Jesuits,  they  were  enforced  with  the  utmost  possible  mildness  by 
the  government,  and  through  the  mediation  of  the  pope  the  General  of  the 
Jesuits  was  induced,  apparently  at  least,  to  dissolve  all  the  houses  belonging 
to  the  order  in  France,  and  to  recall  from  that  country  all  who  were  not  na- 
tives (July,  1846).  (j)    At  this  time,  when  the  Church  was  not  in  the  service 
of  the  court,  and  when  Affre^  Archbishop  of  Paris,  demanded  not  ecclesiasti- 
cal protection  but  liberty,  the  influence  of  the  Church  became  very  consider- 
able, in  behalf  not  only  of  the  hierarchy  but  of  general  Christianity,  in  con- 
sequence of  its  works  of  practical  piety  and  spiritual  learning,  {y)    8.  In 
Feb.  1848,  when  France  was  surprised  by  the  sudden  introduction  of  the  re- 
public, the  Church  felt  bound  by  no  ties  of  gratitude  to  the  dethroned  royal 
family.    One  party  beheld  in  that  event  a  mere  point  of  transition  to  a  le- 
gitimate monarchy ;  the  dispersed  school  of  Lamennais  hailed  in  the  new 
watchword  of  Liberty,  Equality,  and  Fraternity,  which  the  state  now  pro- 
claimed, nothing  but  the  old  principles  of  the  Church ;  the  aspiring  lay-leader 
of  the  Catholic  party  discovered  that  the  Catholic  Church  might  be  con- 
nected with  any  form  of  civil  government  from  which  it  could  expect  ecclesi- 
astical freedom,  {z)  and  even  the  priests  did  not  hesitate  to  bless  the  tree  of 
liberty,  and  pray  for  the  sovereign  people,  {a)    The  Constitution  of  the  Re- 
public promised  freedom  to  every  creed,  protection  for  every  form  of  public 
worship,  and  salaries  to  the  ministers  of  every  form  of  worship  recognized 
by  the  government,  (b)    The  law  respecting  instruction  (May  15,  1850)  gave 
the  clergy  so  much  influence  in  the  supreme  council  for  education,  and  so 
much  freedom  in  the  establishment  of  the  schools,  for  the  formation  of  which 
a  great  independent  association,  much  lauded  by  the  pope  had  been  organized, 
that  the  Catholic  party  willingly  accepted  of  it  as  an  earnest  of  greater  fa- 
vors, (c)    The  Archbishop  Affre  fell  in  the  performance  of  the  duties  of  his 
vocation,  at  the  barricades  (June  28,  1848).     ChaUl  celebrated  Christmas  by 

w)  Decouvcrtes  d*an  bibliophile,  oa  lettres  snr  diffl&rents  points  de  morale  ensclgnds  dans  qnelqnM 
Bcminairos.  ed.  2.  Strasb.  1843.— The  organ  of  the  clergy:  VUniverte^  and  that  of  the  Unlvendtj: 
Journal  dea  Debats,  esp.  for  May— Nov.  1S48.  De  Lamartins^  T^tat,  r6glise,  et  renselgneinent  Par. 
I&IS.  L.  A.  Wamkonig,  d.  K.  Frankr.  a.  d.  Untcrrichtsfrcib.  Frelb.  1S45.  Des  J^oltea,  par  Mi- 
cheUt  et  QuineU  Par.  ISia.  in  5  cd.  Uebera,  by  Stuber.  Ba&  1848.  [MickeUi,  Priest^  Women,  and 
Familic^  transl.  by  Cocks^  Lond.  I&IS.  The  People,  transL  by  CacJa,  Lond.  1849.  QuiMl,  Ultra* 
montanism,  transl  by  Cock*^  Lond.  1845.] 

e)  Der  Process  Affenacr  vor  d.  Pariser  Assiseo.  Brl.  1845.  L.  Ilahtu,  Oeeeh.  d.  Anfluft.  d.  Jea.  Ckia- 
greg.  in  Frankr.  Lps.  1840. 

y)  jyiana,  d.  reL  n.  kirchl.  Leben  in  Fr.  Stattg.  18dd.    R^uchUn,  (p.  608.) 

z)  C.  de  MorUaUmb«t%  dcs  int*>rets  catholiques  an  XIX  Sl&cle.  Par.  1852.  In  8  ed. 

a)  BrL  KZ.  1848.  N.  80.  62. 1849.  N.  2.       h)  Ibid.  1848.  N.  V^ 

c)  Ihid,  1849.  N.  61. 1850.  N.  78. 1851.  N.  85. 


CHAP.  YL    CATH.  CIIUSGH  TILL  1858.    S47a  NAPOLEON  IIL    $471.  SPAIN.    629 

a  Socialist  banquet  in  honor  of  the  sansculotte  who  was  once  born  in  a  sta- 
ble. When  the  dread  of  the  red  republic  could  be  so  turned  as  to  favor  the 
clergy  on  the  ground  that  they  were  friends  of  social  order,  (d)  the  priests 
made  use  of  it  to  secure  millions  of  votes  for  the  President  and  the  Emperor 
by  the  grace  of  God  and  the  will  of  the  people.  Louis  Napoleon  increased 
the  salaries  of  the  bishops,  (e)  richly  endowed  the  chapter  of  St.  Denys,  re- 
stored the  Pantheon  to  the  service  of  St.  Genevieve,  (/)  brought  the  Holy 
Father  back  to  Rome,  and  would  have  been  glad  to  be  crowned  by  the  papal 
hands.  Without  reference  to  the  organic  articles  (p.  633)  the  emperor  re- 
gards the  Concordat  of  1801  as  having  the  force  of  law.  The  strict  Catholic 
party  are  anxious  to  banish  modern  paganism  by  the  substitution  of  the  ec/cle- 
fliastical  fathers  for  the  classics  in  the  schools  of  learning,  (fji)  they  reject  all 
philosophy  of  reason,  and  they  advocate  the  government  of  the  Church  by  the 
civil  power,  and  the  government  of  the  Church  by  the  pope.  Sibour,  the 
now  Archbishop  of  Parw,  took  decided  ground  against  this  party,  and  the 
*'  Universe,"  through  whose  columns  its  influence  was  exerted,  but  an  open 
controversy  was  avoided  through  the  mediation  of  Pius  IX.  (h)  Even  under 
the  reign  of  Napoleon  I.  who  despised  it,  philosophy  had  desisted  from  the 
deification  of  the  flesh,  and  by  the  influence  first  of  Scotch  and  then  of  Ger- 
man metaphysicians,  confidence  was  gained  in  the  supremacy  of  the  mind. 
But  the  literature  of  each  of  the  three  revolutions,  whether  it  be  regarded  as 
a  prophecy  of  the  future,  or  a  reflection  of  the  past,  has  something  terribly 
destructive  and  relaxing  in  its  nature.  It  is  not  the  cold  scofl[ing  of  a  self- 
complacent  and  satisfied  spirit,  but  the  offspring  of  a  torn  and  lacerated 
heart.  For  this  very  reason  it  has  much  that  is  seductive  to  the  present  age, 
and  even  in  its  general  corruption  is  not  without  some  germs  of  life. 

§  471.    Spain,    Portugal.    South  America. 

{rfeiUtehifter.)  Die  klrchL  Zustfinde  in  Spgn.  W&rzb.  1842.  Manuel  rezonado  de  hist  j  legida- 
Hon  de  la  iglesia.  Mmlr.  1S4.\  4  Blocks  l'£«pagne  en  1850.  Ma<lr.  1851.— (?.  Atlujfl,  T America  an 
tempo  spagnuola  isotto  I'aspetto  reli^'ioso  Rlno  al  1S43.  Ancona  1845.  8  vols.  Uebers.  v.  F.  M.  M.  19480. 
8  vols. 

1.  When  Ferdinand  VII .  tore  up  the  constitution  (1814),  the  clergy  ral- 
lied around  the  throne,  the  Inquisition  was  re-established,  and  the  Jesuits  re- 
turned. The  cause  of  the  Church  then  represented  by  those  who  were  called 
the  Apostolicals,  and  that  of  liberty  represented  by  the  Liberals,  appeared  to 
be  completely  separated  from  each  other.  Hence,  when  the  latter  obtained 
the  victory  (1820-23),  all  hierarchical  measures  were  entirely  frustrated,  (a) 
An  army  for  the  defence  of  the  faith  was  then  collected  by  the  clergy,  with 
a  Trappist  at  its  head,  which,  after  the  victory  obtained  by  French  interven- 
tion, produced  a  sanguinary  reaction.  As  the  Apostolic  party  had  connected 
itself  with  Don  Carlos^  then  recognized  as  the  legitimate  heir-apparent,  Queen 
Chrintina^  who  desired  to  obtain  the  government  for  herself  and  her  daugh- 

<f)  Citmot,  le  minii>t<:^re  de  I'lnstraction  pabHqne  et  des  caltea.  Par.  1843. 

e)  BrL  KZ.  1S52.  N.  47.       /)  If4<i.  1853.  N.  2.  oomp.  1S51.  N.  24 

g)  J.  Gaume  le  ver  rongeur  des  sodetue  mudernes  ou  le  paganisme  dans  I'edneation.  Bnix.  1851. 

A)  BrL  KZ.  1852.  N.  48.  lS5a.  N.  81.  82. 

a)  A.  KZ.  1822.  N.  1.  9.  11. 16. 19.  28:^  58.  74. 


630  HODEBN  CHUBGH  niSTOBT.    FSB.  YL    A.  D.  1648-18S8L 

ter  by  the  abolition  of  the  Salio  law,  was  obliged  (1830)  to  nnite  ber  interests 
with  those  of  the  Liberals.  After  the  death  of  the  king  (1833)  Don  Carlos, 
who  was  powerful  through  the  support  of  the  clergy,  by  whom  much  had 
been  sacrificed  in  his  behalf,  made  a  desperate  efifort  to  obtain  possession  of 
the  throne.  But  some  horrible  events  which  then  took  place  evinced  that 
even  the  old  veneration  of  the  people  for  religion  was  now  wavering.  A 
number  of  convenU  in  Madrid  were  destroyed  (July  17,  1834)  by  a  mob  ex- 
cited by  reports  of  poisoning  during  the  prevalence  of  the  cholera,  and  no 
punishments  were  inflicted  on  the  perpetrators,  (h)  A  more  general  insurrec- 
tion broke  out  in  the  summer  of  1835,  in  which  many  convents  and  monks 
were  consumed  in  the  flames  as  auto-da-fes  of  the  revolution,  until  finally  it 
seemed  necessary  to  abolish  the  convents  to  save  the  monks,  (c)  By  a  decree 
of  July  25,  1835,  nine  hundred  houses  belonging  to  the  several  orders  were 
dosed,  that  by  means  of  their  wealth  and  the  property  of  the  Inquisition  and 
of  the  Jesuits,  which  had  previously  been  confiscated,  the  public  debt  might 
be  liquidated.  {(I)  The  government  accused  the  clergy  of  sowing  disseusions 
among  the  people,  and  required  that  every  candidate  for  future  appointment 
in  the  Church  should  produce  a  certificate  from  the  civil  authorities  vouching 
for  his  patriotism,  (e)  As  the  revolution  rolled  on  and  the  necessities  of  the 
state  became  urgent,  all  the  convents  were  confiscated  (1836)  and  token  pos- 
session of  by  the  government,  and  the  sacred  utensils  were  sold  to  cover  the 
expenses  of  the  civil  war.  (/)  The  Cortes  abolished  the  tithes,  and  declared 
that  all  the  property  of  the  Church  belonged  to  the  Spanish  nation  (1887).  (g) 
In  the  ruin  of  Don  Carlos,  which  occurred  principally  in  consequence  of  the 
demoralization  of  his  court  (1839),  a  portion  of  the  clergy  were  inextricably 
implicated.  Gregory  XVI.  had  not  recognized  the  queen,  and  bad  rejected 
the  bishops  appointed  by  the  regency,  but  the  act  by  which  this  was  done 
was  accompanied  by  an  expression  of  desire  that  the  existing  relations  of  the 
country  might  not  be  disturbed.  But  when  the  nuncio,  who  then  represented 
the  poi)e,  wished  to  guard  the  rights  of  the  Church,  Espartero,  the  victorious 
soldier  who  had  driven  away  the  queen-mother,  ordered  him  to  be  transported 
beyond  the  borders  of  the  country  (Dec.  29,  1840).  (A)  The  pope  hereupon 
declared  in  an  allocution  dated  March  1,  1841,  that  all  those  decrees  of  the 
Spanish  government  by  which  the  Church  had  been  despoiled  of  its  property 
were  null  and  void.  (i)  While  Christina  obtained  for  herself  absolution  in 
Rome,  (k)  the  Spanish  Regent  treated  every  recognition  of  the  papal  allocu- 
tion as  a  crime,  wished  to  abolish  all  intercourse  with  Rome  and  all  foreign 
jurisdiction  in  Spain,  because  the  regent  in  Rome  was  disposed  to  sacrifice 
his  secular  to  his  ecclesiastical  interests.  (T)  The  Cortes  determined  upon  a 
new  organization  of  the  clergy,  by  which  the  bishop's  sees  were  much  dimin- 
ished, the  sinecures  were  abolished,  the  property  of  the  Chnrch  was  sold,  and 
moderate  salaries  to  be  pmd  from  taxes  which  it  was  hard  to  collect  were 
assigned  to  the  clergy,  (m)    Nothing  now  remained  for  the  pope  bnt  to  caD 


b)  AZ.  1884  N.  214.        c)  Ptid,  1885.  N.  22T.  287a. 

d)  Acta  h\sL  ecG.  1S85.  p.  258a.       e)  A.  Z.  1885.  N.  84a 

/)  AcU  hist  ecc.  1S36.  p.  5188. 1837.  p.  10.       gr)  A.  Z.  1887.  N.  228.    Acta  hist.  ece.  188T.  (l  la. 

A)  A.  Z.  1341.  N.  2488.        {)  A.  Z.  1S41.  N.  70s.       1^)  A.  Z.  1841.  N.  80. 

I)  Bri.  A.  K.  Z.  1843.  N.  13.        m)  BrL  KZ.  1841.  N.  48.  09. 


CHAP.YL    CATH.  CHUBCH  TILL  18B8.    $471.  SPAIN.    POBTUOAL.  631 

npon  the  whole  Church  to  pray  for  the  distressed  condition  of  the  Church  in 
Spain,  with  the  promise  that  all  who  would  comply  should  receive  plenary 
ahsolution.  (n)  AU  priests  who  gave  attention  to  those  acts  of  the  pope  were 
deposed  and  banished  by  the  regent,  (o)  But  even  the  liberal  prelates  now 
began  to  withdraw  from  the  country,  the  afflicted  Church  succeeded  in  m- 
ducing  the  nation  to  abandon  Espartero,  and  Queen  Isabella  11.^  not  yet  of 
age,  was  declared  (1848)  competent  to  govern.  Her  ministry  soon  perceived 
the  necessity  of  reconciling  tlie  Church  with  the  new  legal  system  created  by 
the  revolution.  The  expelled  priests  were  reinstated,  and  the  papal  rights 
in  Spain  were  acknowledged.  As  the  price  of  his  recognition  of  the  queen 
the  pope  demanded  what  was  now  shown  to  be  an  imposdbility,  the  restora- 
tion of  the  property  of  the  Church.  But  the  sale  of  jill  that  remained  being 
about  one  fourth  of  the  whole,  was  now  suspended,  Gregory  conferred  the 
canonical  investiture  upon  six  of  the  bishops  appointed  by  government  (1846), 
and  Pius,  in  compliance  with  the  wishes  of  France,  rather  hastily  bestowed 
a  dispensation  upon  the  queen  for  her  marriage  with  her  cousin.  After  a 
long  period  of  vacillation  according  to  the  political  complexion  of  the  fre- 
quently changing  ministry,  (;>)  a  concordat  was  agreed  upon  (1851),  by  which, 
notwitlistanding  the  bibles  sent  from  England,  (g)  the  Ciitholic  religion,  to  the 
exclusion  of  every  other  form  of  worship,  was  recognized  as  the  religion  of 
Spmn  for  all  future  time ;  the  instruction  of  the  young  was  committed  to  the 
supervision  of  the  bishops,  to  whom  a  pledge  was  given  tliat  the  government 
would  co-operate  in  the  suppression  of  ii\jurious  books ;  the  country  was  di- 
vided into  new  dioceses,  of  which  there  were  six  less  than  before;  all  that 
remained  of  ecclesiastical  or  monastic  property  was  restored ;  all  new  acqui- 
sitions by  the  Church  were  allowed ;  and  to  provide  agunst  any  deficiency  a 
support,  moderate  only  when  compared  with  their  former  wealth,  was  secured 
to  the  clergy  from  the  sole  of  the  Church  property,  and  from  the  contribu- 
tions in  the  diU'ercnt  communes,  (r)  2.  It  was  not  till  the  Cortes  had 
threatened  the  wealth  and  privileges  of  the  clergy  (»)  that  the  sanguinary 
reign  of  Dom  Miguel  (1829-38)  was  possible,  and  accordingly  his  principal 
support  was  derived  from  that  body.  Hence  Dom  Pedro  could  indulge  in  no 
hope  of  gaining  the  patrimonial  kingdom  for  his  daughter,  except  in  the 
name  of  liberty.  Through  tlie  exertions  principally  of  the  clergy  the  people 
were  induced  to  take  up  arms  against  him,  and  hence,  wlien  Pedro  obtained 
the  victory,  the  age  of  Pombal  returned  to  Portugal.  The  government  de- 
chired  all  prel-itic  sees  filled  by  appointment  at  Rome  on  MiguePs  presentation 
vacant,  and  placed  all  the  rights  of  ecclesiastical  patronage  in  the  hands  of 
the  government  (Aug.  5, 1883).  All  ecclesiastical  orders  were  dissolved  (May 
28,  1834),  all  monastic  property  was  confiscated,  and  nothing  but  friars  truly 
mendicant  were  left,  {t)  The  tithes  were  also  abolished,  and  when  the  pas- 
tors could  not  obtain  tlie  salaries  assumed  by  the  state  treasury,  they  were 


ft)  Of  Feb.  22, 1S42 :  Bri.  K.  Z.  1S42  N.  22.        o)  Ibid.  1S42.  N.  31. 

p)  Ibid.  1S«.  N.  81.  89.    D.  A.  Z.  1S44.   N.  288. 1845.   N.  61.  823.  IS  16.    N.  22.  1347.    N.  21. 183L 
98ft.  297. 

q)  O.  Borrott,  The  Bible  In  Spain.  New  York.  1945.  8.  Lond.  od.  8.  1940. 
r)  BrI.  KZ.  1951.  N.  44  47.  87.        i)  A.  K.  Z.  1822.  N.  49. 182a  N.  48. 
0  A.  Z.  1884.  N.  178. 


632  MODERN  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER  TL    A.  D.  1648-1858L 

nnfortunately  directed  for  them  to  their  congregations,  (ti)  The  pope  threat- 
ened to  place  the  king  under  the  ban,  and  the  exiled  nsarper  was  received  by 
him  as  the  lawful  king.  But  the  property  of  the  convents  found  purchasers, 
and  the  dioceses  were  administered  by  the  capitulary  vicars.  The  dread 
which  Gregory  felt  lest  a  complete  separation  should  be  produced,  conspired 
with  the  conscientious  scruples  of  Donna  Maria  herself  to  induce  both  par- 
ties to  come  to  an  agreemeut  (1841)  under  mutual  pledges.  The  golden  rofse 
was  presented  by  the  nuncio  Oapaocini  to  the  queen,  as  a  godfather^s  present, 
and  a  few  bishops  appointed  by  the  government  received  canonical  investiture 
from  the  pope  (1848).  (v)  But  the  vast  demands  of  Rome  and  the  commo- 
tions of  an  unsettled  constitutional  government  delayed  the  conclusion  of  a 
concordat.  8.  As  the  idea  of  independence  first  awoke  in  Spanish  America 
(1810)  when  the  mother  country  was  oppressed  by  a  power  which  had  no 
Mendly  connection  with  the  Church,  the  clergy  were  generally  partial  to  the 
cause  of  freedom,  and  remained  in  the  unmolested  possession  of  their  wealth. 
In  most  of  the  republics  religious  toleration  was  proclaimed  merely  from  re- 
spect to  liberty  and  the  English,  but  Oatliolicism  still  remained  the  religion 
of  the  state.  In  the  mean  time  the  privileges  of  the  clergy  necessarily  came 
in  conflict  with  the  demands  of  liberalism.  In  Chili  and  Peru  the  number 
of  holy  days  and  convents  was  diminished,  the  Congress  of  Central  Ameriea 
pronounced  monastic  vows  of  no  force  in  the  eye  of  the  law  (1880),  the  Con- 
gress of  Mexico  t^ok  into  its  own  hands  the  right  of  patronage,  banished  those 
prelates  who  protested  against  tlieir  proceedings,  and  seized  upon  their  reve- 
nues (1834).  A  powerftil  party,  however,  in  the  latter  country,  arose  in  op- 
position to  every  interference  of  the  state  with  the  privileges  of  the  clergy. 
During  the  war  with  the  United  States  of  North  America,  when  the  necessi- 
ties of  the  country  were  extreme,  Congress  resolved  (Jan.  1847)  that  a  por- 
tion of  the  ecclesiastical  property  (15  millions  of  dollars)  should  be  sold  for 
the  deliverance  of  their  native  land,  (w)  The  keys  of  the  old  Jesuit  College 
in  Buenos  Ayres  were  presented,  August  26th,  1886,  to  six  priests  belonging 
to  the  Society  of  Jesus.  After  a  brief  dream  of  freedom,  Paraguay  was  ty- 
rannically but  patriarchally  governed  by  Dr,  Franeia  (1814-40)  with  as  great 
a  seclusion  as  was  maintained  by  the  former  Jesuit  government.  This  dicta- 
tor broke  the  power  of  the  clergy,  converted  all  property  belonging  to  the 
convents  into  state  property,  and  declared  cannons  better  safeguards  than 
saints,  {x)  From  respect  to  the  crown  of  Spain,  Pius  VII.  was  deterred  from 
recognizing  the  republics  wliich  had  thrown  off  its  authority,  and  accordingly 
he  refused  to  bestow  canonical  investiture  upon  their  bishops.  Leo  XII.,  as 
late  as  the  year  1824,  enjoined  upon  all  American  prelates  to  adhere  to  the 

u)  A.  Z.  1833.    Append.  N.  447. 

V)  BrL  KZ.  1841.  N.  51.  54.  60.  81. 1842.  N.  53. 1848.  N.  43. 

to'  P.  <r.  Kohbe^  Ocsch.  d.  Frolheitskampfcs  im  i>paD.  a.  port  A.  IlanD.  1832.  K  3iuMenpJbriU 
Scbilderang  d.  Rep.  Mexico.  Hann.  1S44.  2  vols.  £v.  E.  Z.  1881.  N.  85.  A.  Z.  1834.  N.  805w  D.  A 
Z.  1847.  N.  75.  77. 

a*)  Rfngger  &  Lonpchatnp,  <L  Rev.  v.  Parag.  n.  d.  Dlctatorialreglerang  d.  Dr.  Franda.  Stnttf. 
1827.  RJ.P,&  W.  P.  RoberUon,  Letters  on  Parag.  Lond.  188a  2  vols.  [Francia's  Keign  of  Tenor. 
Lond.  1887.  a  Carlyle'$  Essays  Crlt  as  M1&  p.  547.  (Fur.  Qaar.  Rev.  1848.  &  Edeo.  Mag.  1848. 
Sept  p.  75.)] 


CHAP.  YL    CATH.  CHUBGH  TILL  1868.    $471.  S.  AMEBICA    $472.  BELGIUM.    633 

Intimate  government.  But  as  there  was  danger  that  in  this  way  the  people 
wonld  become  completely  alienated  from  the  noly  See,  the  principle  was 
finally  recognized  at  Rome  (1825)  that  in  matters  relating  to  the  Church,  ne- 
gotiations shonld  be  conducted  with  any  government  actually  in  power,  with- 
out thereby  deciding  any  thing  with  respect  to  it^  legitimacy.  When  the 
pope  refused  to  confirm  the  appointed  Bishop  of  Kio  Janeiro,  he  was  re- 
minded by  the  Regency  of  Brazil  that  he  had  mistaken  the  age  in  which  he 
lived  (1884).  (y)  In  New  Grenada  the  priests  were  made  subject  to  the  civil 
authorities  (1845),  tithes  were  abolished,  the  Jesuits  were  expelled  (1840),  all 
who  forsook  the  convents  were  promised  the  assistance  of  the  state,  the  con- 
legations  were  required  to  choose  their  own  pastors,  and  the  Archbishop  of 
Bogota  was  banished  (1851).  Pius  IX.  held  a  sorrowful  allocution  (Sept.  27, 
1852)  with  reference  to  these  proceedings,  and  in  opposition  to  the  wild  lib- 
erty which  every  one  in  that  country  eigoyed,  to  publish  through  the  press 
every  wild  abortion  of  the  brain,  (z)  But  the  popular  faith  in  South  America 
dung  to  its  connection  with  Rome. 

§  472.    Belgium  and  Holland, 

8ophronlxon.  182&  P.  2.  Tub.  Qnartalschr.  1S26.  P.  1.  Rom  n.  Belg.  Neust  1881.  Le  livre  nolr. 
Brax.  1S87.  8  e<l.  ilbere.  (by  Bfudh)  m.  Beiuerkk.  by  Uheinwald  Altenb.  18:iS.  Kheinw.  Bep.  vol. 
XXIV.  [1.  76. 169.  276.  XXV.  i>.  178s«.  XXVI.  p.  71a«.  IllaL  \h,1  Bll.  vol.  VII.  p.  627.  vol.  VIII.  p. 
4&  2t0.  411.  fiOl.  781.  IX.  p.  7S3><e.  //.  /AfM^A,  Notices  of  Uie  SUt«  of  Bel.  in  Geneva  and  Bclgiam. 
Edinb.  1S44.    Juniut,  d.  Je»uitisinas  in  Bel^.  Lpa.  1346. 

1.  Against  a  Protestant  government  which  had  affixed  the  effigy  of  the 
traitorous  Bishop  of  Ghent  to  the  public  gallows,  had  closed  the  schools  of 
the  Jesuits,  and  hod  attempted  to  educate  a  liberal  clergy  by  means  of  a 
philosophical  school  in  the  "  College  of  the  Pope"  at  Lou  vain,  the  apostoli- 
cal party  did  not  hesitate,  although  the  Concordat  of  1827  was  formed 
according  to  its  will,  on  the  model  of  that  of  Napoleon,  (a)  to  conclude  an 
alliance  with  the  revolution  by  which  Belgium  was  to  be  separated  from 
Holland  (1830).  Catholicism  was  thereby  obliged  to  accede  to  liberal  forms, 
and  to  a  free  toleration  in  matters  of  faith  as  well  as  of  education.  After 
the  victory,  however,  these  parties  again  separated,  since  the  bishops  held  in 
their  hands  the  fate  of  the  lower  clergy,  by  the  power  of  arbitrarily  deposing 
all  who  were  sincerely  inclined  to  connect  themselves  with  the  interests  of 
liberty.  As  both  parties  were  well  aware  that  ultimate  victory  was  to  be 
decided  by  the  education  given  to  the  next  generation,  the  Liberals  founded 
by  their  own  contributions  a  university  at  Brussels,  and  the  bishops  a  f^ee 
Catholic  university  at  Malines,  which  was  afterwards  removed  to  Louvain, 
and  was  solemnly  opened  in  the  College  of  the  Pope,  tliat  the  old  Louvain 
might  once  more  be  restored,  (b)  By  the  law  of  1842,  the  clergy  were 
allowed  to  exercise  much  more  than  a  religious  influence  upon  popular  edu- 
cation, but  the  State-Gymnasia  were  guarded  (1851)  against  it,  and  were 

y)  BrL  KZ.  1840.  N.  28.       «)  Ibid.  1850.  N.  69. 1851.  N.  48, 1852.  N.  70. 

a)  A.  KZ.  1827.  N.  165.  1829.  N.  109.  174fl. 

b)  A.  Z.  1884.  Suppl.  N.  465flw  1885.  Buppl.  N.  518.  515.  DlaciUBlon  de  la  lot  sar  Tenseignement 
tapMetu  de  27  Sept,  1885,  et  de  la  loi  aar  le  jury  d'examen  da  8  Avril,  1944 ;  prec^ee  d'an  aper^n 
hkL  §ai  Forgan.  oniveraitaire  en  Belgiqae.  Braz.  1S44  < 


634  MODERN  OHUBOH  HI8T0BT.    PEB.  YI.    A.  D.  1M8-18B8. 

therefore  deprived  by  the  Archbishop  of  Meohlin  of  the  oustomary  masB  at 
All -Saints.  The  Bishop  of  Liege  refused  to  grant  absolution  to  the  Liberals 
by  withholding  it  from  the  Freemasons  (1837),  (c)  and  the  ardent  efforts  made 
in  behalf  of  missions  aroused  all  the  elements  in  the  state  in  opposition  to 
each  other  (1888).  When  the  Catholic  party,  by  means  of  the  liberal  law  of 
elections,  the  effect  of  which  was  to  give  a  controlling  influence  to  the  people 
from  the  country,  hod  obtained  for  the  most  part  a  migority  in  the  Chambers, 
the  cities  collected  tlieir  strength,  and  from  the  altered  position  of  the  Cham- 
bers proceeded  a  liberal  ministry  (Aug.  1847),  which  pronounced  the  state 
entirely  a  secular  (laique)  institution.  The  Protestant  king  has  hitherto 
understood  how  to  govern  the  two  parties  with  much  prudence,  by  balancing 
their  powers  against  each  other.  2.  In  Holland^  the  Concordat  of  1827  was 
never  fully  carried  out,  and  the  Roman  Catliolic  population,  amounting  to 
more  than  a  million,  were  called  the  Dutch  Mission,  and  were  under  the  ad- 
ministration of  an  apostolic  vicar,  (it)  The  Constitution  of  1848  secured 
complete  freedom  of  faith  to  every  one,  and  equal  protection  to  all  religions 
societies  in  the  kingdom.  Accordingly,  the  government  declared  that  noth- 
ing prevented  a  systematic  arrangement  of  Catholic  affairs  under  its  super- 
vision. But  without  reference  to  this  supervision,  Pius  instituted  a  hierarchy 
for  Holland  and  Brabant,  consisting  of  four  bishops  under  the  Archbishop  of 
Utrecht  (Moi'ch  4,  7,  1853),  placed  it  under  the  conduct  of  the  Propaganda, 
and  solicited  for  it  the  alms  of  the  faithful.  The  consequent  storm  of  popu- 
lar rage  among  the  Protestants  accomplished  only  the  overtlirow  of  the  lib- 
eral ministry  of  Thorbeckc.  Tlie  Netherlandic  government  made  known  to  the 
Roman  Curia  the  unhappy  impression  produced  upon  it  by  the  language  of  the 
allocution  in  which  these  proceedings  were  announced,  and  made  some  inqui- 
ries respecting  the  oath  which  the  bishops  had  taken.  Cardinal  Antonelli 
promised  to  erase  from  the  latter  the  offensive  passage  respecting  the  perse- 
cution of  heretics.  In  the  Ilague,  the  opinion  gained  the  day  that  protection 
was  to  be  found  in  a  well-guarded  system  of  freedom,  and  after  some  very 
excited  discussions  in  the  Chambers,  a  law  was  passed,  Sept.  10,  dechuing 
that  all  ecclesiastical  societies  were  entirely  free  to  arrange  their  own  eccle- 
siastical affairs,  and  were  merely  bound  to  inform  tlie  government  of  their 
proceedings,  and  were  subject  to  the  approval  of  the  civil  authorities  only  as 
fur  as  the  co-operation  of  such  authorities  was  necessary ;  that  the  royal  con- 
sent should  be  required  with  respect  to  the  place  in  wliich  the  business  of  the 
synods  should  be  transacted,  the  place  in  which  its  supreme  authority  should 
reside,  and  the  acceptance  of  an  ecclesiastical  ofSce  by  a  foreigner,  but  that 
this  consent  should  generally  be  refused  only  when  the  public  tranquillity  re- 
quired it ;  and  tliat  no  ecclesiastical  titles  or  offices  should  be  allowed  to  con- 
flict with  the  dignities  or  interests  of  the  civil  powers,  or  of  the  other  religiooi 
societies.  (/) 

c)  AcU  l»l8t  occ  1887,  p.  22a.  BrL  KZ.  1S41.  N.  7. 

d)  O.  Mf)^^  Propag&nda.  vol.  II.  p.  80§sl 

«)  The  orig.  Docc :  BrL  KZ.  1868.  N.  81  86.  A.  KZ.  18d8w  N.  7U  118a.  US.  121a.  IMi 


CHAP.  YL    CATH.  CHUBCH  TUX  186&    S47&  GEBMAN  CHURCU.  635 

§  478.     Restoration  of  the  German  Church, 

Nen^te  OnindUgcn  d.  tentschkath.  Klrchenverf.  Id  Actenst  Stnttg.  1821.  Supplom.  in  Yater's 
Aobaa.  vol.  II.  p.  61uw  Orig.  Doco.  In  MUneh^  Cunc  vul.  II.  Droide-Uldkhof,  KKecht  M&nst 
1828.  Tol-  L    O.  M*jtr^  Propaganda,  vul.  IL  p.  8S5sa. 

An  ecclesiastical  constitution  for  the  whole  of  Germany  was  not  perfected 
at  the  Congress  of  Vienna,  {a)  Austria  had  preserved  her  ecclesiastical  con- 
dition untunclied,  and  had  just  quietly  modified  the  prominent  points  of  the 
laws  which  Joseph  II,  had  given  to  the  Church.  (?>)  The  ecclesiastical  rela- 
tions of  the  small  number  of  Catholics  dispersed  in  various  parts  of  ^Saxoin/^ 
were  arranged  by  the  civil  laws.  These  could  easily  be  maintained  in  the 
Grand  Duchy  in  spite  of  the  complaints  of  the  Vicar-General  at  Fulda  (1823), 
and  in  the  kingdom,  notwithstanding  the  royal  favor  toward  the  Catholics 
there,  the  acceptance  of  an  apostolic  vicar,  and  the  displeasure  of  the  papal 
court  (1827).  (e)  In  other  places,  the  legal  doctrine  prevailed  that  the  eccle- 
siastical constitution  was  to  be  arranged  by  special  treaty  with  Rome.  The 
papal  court  avoided  establishing  a  German  national  Church  by  negotiations 
with  the  German  Confederacy.  The  first  power  which  separated  from  the 
others  was  Bavaria^  by  which  a  Concordat  was  concluded  in  1817,  which, 
after  much  debate  whether  it  was  consistent  with  the  constitution  of  the 
country,  was  introduced  in  1821.  Negotiations  were  entered  into  by  Prussia 
with  reference  to  the  ^ve  millions  of  Catholics  residing  especially  in  the  bor- 
der provinces ;  and  in  the  treaty  which  was  concluded,  the  mere  form  of  a 
Concordat  was  guarded  against,  (if)  This  example  was  followed  by  the  king- 
dom of  U:mover  (1824).  An  association  of  the  other  states  situated  generally 
in  the  southern  part  of  Germany,  was  formed,  after  many  great  schemes  had 
been  rejected,  and  the  parties  had  become  wearied  with  a  series  of  negotia- 
tions continued  through  many  years,  and  was  called  the  Ecclesiastical  pro- 
vince of  the  Upper  Rhine ^  with  five  bishoprics,  and  Freiburg  as  an  archiepis- 
copal  see  (1827).  When  the  princes  made  a  condition  with  respect  to  the 
Roman  enactments  on  this  subject,  reserving  every  thing  which  might  seem 
to  be  demanded  by  their  sovereign  rights,  the  national  peculiarities  of  the 
Church,  and  the  equal  rights  of  Protestants,  Pius  VIII.  reminded  the  bishops 
concerned  (1880),  that  when  opposed  by  laws  tending  to  destroy  the  souls 
of  men,  they  should  obey  God  rather  than  men.  {e)  These  treaties  are  princi- 
pally confined  to  the  new  limitations  of  the  episcopal  dioceses,  to  the  boundaries 
of  the  provinces,  to  the  endowment  of  the  Church,  and  to  the  appointment  of 
the  higher  ecclesiastical  officers,  which  was  to  bo  divided  between  the  sov- 
ereign and  the  pope.  The  various  measures  necessary  for  this  division  of  the 
appointing  power,  was  the  principal  subject  of  negotiation.     That  which 

o)  Klvhtr,  Uoben.  d.  dIpL  Yerh.  d.  W.  Congr.  Abth.  III.  p.  458ca.  a.  Aeten  d.  W.  Congr.  toI  L 
P.  2.  p.  23ita.  vol  IV.  p.  SlOm. 

h)  J.  L.  E.  r.  Barth-Btirthenheim,  Ocstr.  geistL  Anpelegcnh.  In  pf>llL  admin.  Bezleh.  VIen.  IMl. 

c)  AcWnstficke  u.  d.  Verb.  d.  kath.  Glanbfnsgenoseen  im  K.  Sacbsen.  Dresd.  1S81.     DrovU- 
HStUhof.  p.  417.  8S2.-«.  A.  KZ.  1824  N.  1898a.  1825.  N.  86. 

d)  KluWr,  xaL  Elniicbt.  d.  katb.  KlrcbenweaL  in  Prouaa.  Frkfl  1829.  A.  AtuiUr,  Pr.  o.  Baicrn 
Im  Cone.  m.  Rom.  Ncu&t  1924. 

s)  gisenschmid,  Bullariam.  vol  IL  p.  SlSaa.  Ig.  Longnett  DarsU  d.  RechtaverbiltniaM  d. 
Beacbdfe  in  d.  obenh.  Kirchenprov.  T&b.  1840. 


636  MODERN  CHTJBCH  HISTORY.    PES.  TL    A.  D.  164fr-1888. 

conld  hardly  have  been  expected  at  that  time  from  Protestant  princes,  bnt 
which  was  nevertheless  demanded  in  the  principal  article  of  the  imperial  depu- 
tation, was  accomplbhed  tlirongh  the  mediation  of  the  pope,  and  the  superior 
clergy  were  richly  endowed  with  worldly  property ;  but  as  the  Church  itself 
was  not  represented  in  these  negotiations,  no  peculiar  legal  jurisdiction  was 
secured  for  it.  The  manner  in  which  WeMenberg  was  abused  and  dispos- 
sessed of  his  episcopal  authority,  proves  that  no  degree  of  merit  for  services 
done  for  the  Church  can  be  sufficient  to  obtain  pardon  at  Rome  for  a  free 
and  German  spirit,  (/)  even  when  a  quiet  and  genuine  piety  was  not  excluded 
from  the  episcopal  sees,  (g)  The  whole  of  Protestant  (Germany  was  looked 
upon  as  missionary  ground.  When  an  apostolic  vicar  was  sent  by  the  pope 
to  the  North,  to  take  up  his  residence  in  Ilamburg,  preparatory  to  the  erec- 
tion of  a  bishopric  of  Hamburg,  the  governments  concerned  forbade  all  per- 
sons to  hold  any  official  intercourse  with  him  (1889s.),  and  this  vicariate  was 
attached,  as  it  had  been  at  first,  to  a  Westphalian  bishopric,  (h) 

§  474,     T?ie  Ecclesiastical  Controversy  in  Prussian  Germany, 

lAup^yrfSy  Gesch.  a.  beatlge  Yerf  d.  katb.  K.  Preoas.  HaL  1S40.  vol  L— Acta  btot  eeei  1886L  p. 
264fis.  1S87.  p.  87988.  Die  kath.  K.  in  d.  prean.  Rheinprovinz  a.  d.  Erzb.  Clemens  kxxg.  FrkC  1888L 
(GUnel^r)  Ue.  d.  coin.  Angelegenb.  v.  Irenaeaa.  Lpa.  ISSS.  Die  offentl.  Zaati&nde  ixn  Groaahen, 
Posen.  Ha].  1889.  Jl.  ITaa^,  d.  b«iden  Enbisch.  LpA.  1S89.  Pcrsnnen  u.  ZasUnde  a.  d.  Urcbllcb  poL 
Wirrcn  in  Pr.  Lps.  1S40.  Lit  Snmmary :  A.  KZ.  Lit  Bl  1683.  N.  10698. 1889.  N.  S2aflL  lS4a  K.  SObb. 
89. 1 1398. 1S41.  N.  40s.    [A:  R.  Ilageribach,  KGescb.  des  18.  a.  19.  Jabrb.  YoHm.  XY.  toU  IL] 

Frederic  William  III.  had  bestowed  upon  the  clergy  an  ample  amount  of 
wealth,  and  he  had  established  schools  and  built  churches  for  them.  But  the 
dislike  felt  by  the  Catholic  Church  to  its  subjection  to  a  Protestant  state 
where  it  had  once  borne  sway,  was  increased  to  new  religious  fervor  as  it 
recollected  the  state  of  things  during  the  middle  ages,  and  it  found  an  open 
expression  in  Prussia  when  the  ecclesiastical  and  civil  laws  came  into  coUisioD 
on  the  subject  of  mixed  marriages.  The  Catholics  had  been  in  the  habit  of 
applying  to  the  case  of  Protestants  the  long-established  usage  condemning  all 
marriages  with  heretics.  But  after  the  thirty  years*  war,  the  custom  of 
mixed  marriages  had  become  established  among  the  people.  According  to 
ordinary  German  usage,  where  no  marriage  compact  determined  the  matter 
otherwise,  the  children  were  educated  according  to  the  faith  of  the  parent 
with  whom  they  corresponded  in  sex.  A  peculiar  legislation,  based  on  the 
principle  of  a  certain  legal  equality,  was  gradually  formed  in  the  dlffisrent 
states  on  this  subject,  with  respect  to  which  nothing  was  said  by  the  Roman 
authorities.  In  Prussia,  the  common  law  was  so  changed,  that  where  the 
unanimous  wish  of  the  parents  was  not  opposed  to  it,  the  children  were  re- 
quired to  be  educated  in  the  Church  of  the  father.  By  an  order  of  the 
Cabinet  issued  in  1825,  this  requisition  was  extended  to  the  province  of  the 
Rhine,  and  to  Westphalia,  by  declaring  that  any  obligations  of  betrothed 

/)  Denkacbr.  {L  d.  Yerflibren  d.  ronL  Hoft.  Carlsr.  1818.  Wees.  AngeL  Lps.  1890.  On  tbe  eootm* 
veny,  for  and  againBt:  Puvitut,  benrth.  Ancoige.  Hdlb.  1818w  and  Hermea  1819.  Sect  1. 18S0.  Seet  i 
BUU  later:  A.  KZ.  1S27.  N.  175.  1828.  N.  10. 

a)  £.  g.  A.  KZ  1883.  N.  lis.    K  v.  SoKeni,  d.  Blsohulb  Sailer  n.  Wittmann.  Batiab.  1889.  It 

A)  BrL  KZ.  1810.  N.  48.    Jftjar,  vol  IL  p.  607i& 


CHAP.  YL    OATH.  CHURCH  TILL  1358.    S474.DBOSTE.    HEBMES.  637 

persons  to  the  contrary  were  not  binding,  and  any  requirements  made  as  con- 
ditions of  the  marriage  rite  by  the  Church  were  unlawful.  But  the  cere- 
mony of  marriage,  without  a  promise  that  the  children  should  be  educated 
in  the  Catholic  fdth,  had  previously  been  performed  frequently  in  Eastern, 
and  rarely  in  Western  Prussia.  (</)  In  the  latter  country,  therefore,  the 
Catholic  clergymen  now  generally  refused  to  solemnize  marriage  unless  such 
promises  were  voluntarily  offered.  At  the  same  time,  the  Catholic  bride  had 
her  scruples  of  conscience  so  excited,  and  was  so  much  terrified  by  what  she 
must  meet  at  the  confessional,  that  she  was  never  satisfied  with  a  Protestant 
ceremonial.  When  requested  by  the  government  in  some  way  to  accommo- 
date this  matter,  the  Western  Prussian  bishops  addressed  themselves  to  the 
pope,  to  know  whether  there  was  any  way  in  which  they  could  comply  with 
the  law  of  the  state.  Pius  VIII.,  in  an  apostolical  brief  of  March  25,  1830, 
pronounced  all  mixed  marriages  improper,  but  valid ;  he  did  not  forbid  the 
ecclesiastical  benediction  where  securities  were  given  for  the  Catholic  educa- 
tion of  all  the  children,  but  in  all  instances  permitted  the  parties  to  enter  the 
marriage  relation  in  the  presence  of  the  pastor,  without  any  ecclesiastical 
rites  (praesentia  passiva),  though  without  ecclesiastical  censures,  (b)  The 
government  did  not  publish  this  brief,  until,  by  a  secret  agreement,  the  bish- 
ops interested  in  the  matter  had  granted  what  had  been  refused  at  Rome, 
viz.,  that  as  a  general  rule,  marriage  should  be  solemnized  according  to  the 
forms  of  the  Church,  and  that  only  in  rare  cases,  easy  to  be  evaded,  the 
limitation  of  the  passive  assistance  should  be  applied,  (c)  This  agreement  of 
1834  was  denied  by  the  bishops  in  Rome,  until  a  written  confession  of  the 
dying  Bishop  of  Treves  brought  the  truth  to  the  full  knowledge  of  the  pope 
(1836).  Clemens  Droste^  the  suffragan  Bishop  of  Vuchcring^  who  had  pre- 
viously defended  tlie  unconditional  freedom  of  the  Church,  was  made  Arch- 
bishop of  Cologne  (1886),  after  giving  a  promise  that  he  would  peaceably  and 
sincerely  conform  to  the  agreement  entered  into  with  respect  to  the  Brief  of 
1880.  {d)  With  him,  however,  a  party  came  into  prominence,  determined  at 
all  hazards  to  deliver  the  Church  from  what  they  called  the  yoke  of  the 
state.  («)  When  the  archbishop  came  to  know  the  contradiction  which  ex- 
isted between  the  agreement  of  the  bishops  and  the  papal  brief,  he  forbade 
his  clergy  to  solemnize  the  marriage  rites  of  the  Church  without  a  promise 
that  the  children  should  be  educated  in  the  Catholic  faith.  In  vain  he  was 
reminded  by  the  government  of  the  promise  he  had  made  previous  to  his 
appointment.  The  offence  he  thus  gave  was  much  increased  by  his  informal  pro- 
ceedings with  respect  to  the  Hermesians.  In  opposition  to  the  doctrine  of  con- 
fidence in  authority,  which  it  was  said  could  never  rise  above  doubt,  Ilermes 
(1776-1881)  had  attempted  to  find  proof  of  the  doctrines  of  the  Catholic 
(Thnrch  in  the  absolute  necessities  of  human  reason,  (/)  and  left  behind  him  a 
school  which  extended  itself  from  Bonn,  and  prevailed  in  all  the  institutions 


o)  •;:  RuUchker,  d.  gem.  Ehen  v.  kath.  Standp.  VIen.  (1887.  188a)  1841.— (7.  F.  JacobBon,  (L 
d.  gem.  Ehen  in  Dentschland,  lo»b.  in  Pr.  Lpa.  1888.  C/i.  F.  9.  Ammon,  d.  gem.  Ehen.  Dreed.  2 
•d.1889. 

b)  Acta  hist  eoo.  lSd&  p.  lOes.        c)  Ibid.  1887.  p.  4288B.        d)  Ibid.  1836.  p.  SlSsa. 

e)  Beitrage  z.  Kirchengesch.  d.  19.  Jahrb.  in  DeutschL  Aagsb.  1886l 

/)  EinL  in  d.  cbr.  kath.  TbeoL  MOnat.  toL  L  (1819.)  1881.  voL  IL  (1629.)  1884.    Cniriitkath.  Dog- 


638  MODERN  CHUBCH  HISTORY.    PER.  YL    A.  D.  1«48-1808l 

for  edncation  on  the  Rhine.  The  opponents  of  this  school  ohtained  a  hear^ 
ing  at  Rome ;  and  in  conseqnence  of  a  trial,  the  most  responsible  actor  in 
which  was  afterwards  found  to  be  ntterly  unacqnaint«d  with  the  G^erman 
language  and  literature,  (g)  the  writings  of  the  deceased  Hermes  were  con- 
demned in  an  apostolical  brief  of  Sept.  26,  1835.  As  his  system  had  not  been 
explained  with  much  precision,  and  a  distinct  deviation  from  the  doctrines 
of  the  Church  had  not  been  proved,  the  Hermesians  were  not  without  hopes 
that  they  might  convince  the  Holy  Father  of  the  orthodoxy  of  their  instruo- 
tor.  Archbishop  Droste  impaired  the  influence  of  the  theological  faculty  at 
Bonn,  by  forbidding  the  students  at  the  confessional  to  hear  lectures  from 
the  Hermesians.  (h)  In  the  negotiations  of  the  government  with  the  arch- 
bishop, an  amicable  understanding  was  obtained  on  this  subject ;  but  with 
respect  to  the  mixed  marriages,  he  adhered  to  the  declaration  that  he  could 
comply  with  the  agreement  of  1834  only  so  far  as  it  was  consistent  with  the 
Brief  of  1880.  He  was  therefore  threatened  with  a  suspension  of  his  oflScial 
duties,  imprisoned  Nov.  20,  1887,  and  finally  brought  to  the  fortress  of  ICn- 
den,  on  the  ground  set  forth  in  a  ministerial  decree,  that  he  had  violated  his 
promise,  undermine<l  the  laws,  and  excited  the  minds  of  the  people  under  the 
influence  of  two  revolutionary  parties.  Gregory  XVI.,  as  early  as  Dec.  10, 
protested  against  the  violence  thus  committed  against  the  Church,  extolled 
the  martyrdom  of  the  archbishop,  and  rejected  the  illegal  evasion  of  the 
Brief  of  1830.  (/)  The  Prussian  ambassador  declared  that  the  measure 
against  the  archbishop  was  merely  a  temporary  act  of  self-defence,  and  ac- 
knowledged the  pope  himself  as  a  final  judge  in  the  case,  (i*)  The  pope, 
however,  demanded  that  before  any  negotiations  could  be  entered  upon,  the 
archbishop  must  be  restored  to  his  former  position.  Both  parties  then  ap- 
pealed to  public  opinion,  by  presenting  to  the  world  representations  of  the 
original  grounds  of  the  quarrel.  (/)  Gorres^  as  a  voluntary  advocate  of  the 
archbishop,  made  an  attack  upon  Protestantism,  and  the  whole  official  body 
of  the  Prussian  government.  (/«)  The  party  on  the  other  side  regarded  the 
controversy  as  a  struggle  between  German  liberty  and  Roman  dominion. 
Every  existing  element  of  discontent  was  for  the  time  involved  in  this  reli- 
gious contention.  The  sullen  humor  of  the  Catholic  people  on  the  Rhine 
and  in  Westphalia,  was  exhibited  in  individual  acts  of  violence.  The  other 
West  Prussian  bishops  announced  their  renunciation  of  the  agreement ;  and 
although  the  government  refused  to  receive  it,  the  Cabinet  declared  that  it 
never  intended  to  compel  a  pastor,  contrary  to  his  conscience,  to  solemniie 

matik,  ed  bj  ActUerfOdt,  Mfinst  1S34.  2  vols.— (7.  O.  yudner,  Philosophiio  Hermeeil  e^Iicatloit 
exlstimstlo.  Lps.  183S.    Perronfy  z.  Oesch.  d.  Ilermeatanisin.  A.  d.  lUl.  Efttisb.  1689. 

g)  Acta  hist  eco.  1886.  p.  307m.  Perroninfl,  Theologus  Bomaniu  Tapalana.  Col.  1840.  Shmiek 
d.  Herinu!«ian{!«inu8  u.  Perrone.  Bri.  1S44. 

h)  Eleenich^  Acta  Hermeslana.  Gott  1S86.  Braunti  Elwnieh:  Meletemata  theoL  Lpa.  18S& 
Acta  Rotnuna.  Han.  188S.  (by  Ref\fueH)  Die  Wahrh.  in  d.  Uennea'scben  Sacbe.  Darmst  1SS7  Xd» 
Acta  antihcrm.  Ratisb.  1S89. 

0  Acta  hist  eoc  1SS7.  p.  Sn.         k)  Ibid.  p.  576e8. 

t)  Darlegnng  d.  Verfahrcns  d.  Prenss.  Begiening  gegen  d.  Enb.  v.  Koln.  BrL  188S.  4.  EtpORlrioM 
di  fHtto  doctiinenlata  su  quanto  ba  precednto  e  segnito  la  deportazione  di  McMwigDor  Drottn  £«■>% 
1838.  Katisb.  1S88. 

m)  Athanaaiaa.  Ratisb.  188a  1.  ed.  in  Jan.,  4  ed.  at  E«ter. 


CHAP.  VL    OATH.  CHUBCII  TILL  1858.    %  4T1  DUNIN.    FEED.  WM.  IV.       639 

mixed  marriages,  or  to  forbid  him  to  make  discreet  inqniries  respecting  the 
edaoation  of  the  children  (1888).  (w)  Dunin^  Archbishop  of  Gnesen  and  Posen, 
bad  even  in  1887  besonght  the  government,  in  order  to  correct  the  abuses 
which  had  gained  gronnd  within  his  jurisdiction,  that  either  the  Brief  of 
1880  might  be  published  in  his  diocese,  or  that  he  miglit  be  permitted  to 
apply  for  a  decision  of  the  apostolic  see.  On  being  refused  both  requests,  he 
aeoretlj  issued  a  pastoral  epistle  (Feb.,  1838),  in  which  he  declared  every 
priest  suspended  who  should  thereafter  solemnize  a  mixed  niarringe  without 
a  security  that  the  offspring  should  be  Catholic,  (o)  The  government  de- 
prived this  order  of  all  force,  promised  its  protection  to  every  priest  who 
should  be  threatened  on  account  of  his  non-observance  of  it,  and  arraigned 
the  archbishop  before  the  superior  court  for  high  treason  and  disobedi- 
ence. (/>)  He  denied  the  competence  of  the  court,  but  complied  with  a  cita- 
tion to  Berlin.  After  ineffectual  negotiations,  a  judiciid  decision  was  here 
pronounced  (April,  1889),  which  deposed  him,  and  condemned  him  for  dis- 
obedience to  a  six  months^  imprisonment  in  a  fortress.  Tlie  king,  however, 
condescended  to  regard  a  letter  of  the  archbishop  as  a  request  for  pardon, 
and  therefore  suspended  the  sentence  of  deposition,  and  remitted  the  punish- 
ment of  imprisonment,  though  on  condition  that  he  should  not  leave  the  city 
of  Berlin.  He  immediately  fled  from  the  city  to  Posen  (Oct.,  1839),  where 
he  was  seized,  and  brought  to  Oolberg.  All  the  churches  in  his  diocese  were 
hang  in  mourning,  {q)  Frederic  William  IV,  found  this  complicated  state 
of  affairs  still  unsettled  at  his  accession.  All  the  Prussian  bishops  had 
adopted  the  views  of  the  Roman  court,  except  the  Prince-bishop  of  Breslan, 
who  was  compelled,  by  the  conflict  between  his  convictions  and  the  circimi- 
stances  in  which  he  was  placed,  to  resign  his  pastoral  staff"  (Aug.,  1840).  (r) 
The  Archbishop  Dunin  (d.  1842)  was  allowed  by  the  king  to  return  to  his 
diocese  ;  and  having  exhorted  his  clergy  to  be  lovers  of  peace,  he  gave  orders, 
that  as  they  were  forbidden  by  law  to  require  securities  for  the  education  of 
the  children ;  in  all  mixed  marriages  they  should  abstain  from  every  act  which 
could  be  construed  as  an  assent  to  them.  («)  The  king  established  a  Catholic 
department  in  the  ministry  for  public  worship,  renounced  tlie  Placet  in  mat- 
ters of  faith,  and  gave  full  liberty  to  the  bishops  to  hold  intercourse  with  the 
Roman  see  (Jan.  1,  1841).  Negotiations  were  |ilso  opened  with  the  papal 
conrt,  in  consequence  of  which.  Archbishop  Droste,  with  his  own  consent, 
on  account  of  his  ill  health,  was  appointed  coadjutor,  with  the  right  of  being 
the  successor,  to  John  of  Oeissel^  Bishop  of  Speyer.  By  an  open  royal  letter, 
the  archbishop  was  honorably  released  from  his  confinement,  and  from  all 
imputations  of  a  guilty  participation  in  revolutionary  movements.  (/)    He 

f»)  A.  Z.  1S88.  N.  70.  SuppL  N.  87.  Suppl. 

0)  A.  Z.  ISSa  N.  88.  SuppL 

p)  A.  Z.  1S38.  N.  20Sd.  Prensfl.  Staatsz.  188a  N.  862.  A.  Z.  1889.  N.  85.  Espodzione  di  diritto  e 
41  fkttu  onn  antenticl  doeumentL  Roma,  11  Apr.,  1889.  Ratisb.  1889.  Jiintely  Yertbeidlgung  d.  Enb, 
DqdId.  WQrzb.  1889. 

q)  Bit  KZ.  1889.  N.  88. 102. 

r)  A.  Z.  1889.  N.  2a   A.  KZ.  1841.  N.  81.  D.  A.  Z.  1845.  N.  5. 

«)  Bri.  KZ.  1840.  N.  <4.  69.  74,    F.  Pohl,  M.  v.  Dunin.  Marienb.  1848. 

1)  BrL  KZb  1S41.  N.  14  9.  ooxnp.  61. 1842.  N.  & 


640  MODEBN  CHURCH  HISTOBT.    P£B.  YL    A.  D.  164a-iaB& 

0 

now  declared  that  be  only  wished  henceforth  to  spend  his  life  in  praying  for 
hid  diocese  (March  9,  1842),  (i/)  and  as  an  anthor,  somewhat  awkwardly  but 
honestly  defended  the  liberty  of  both  sides,  and  the  mutual  friendship  of 
Church  and  State  (d.  1845).  (r)  The  Ilermeeians  had  already  given  up  their 
own  cause;  and  when  their  two  last  advocates  maintdned  at  least  that 
Ilcrmes  had  not  taught  what  the  papal  brief  had  imputed  to  him,  on  an  ap- 
plication from  the  coadjutor,  they  were  dismissed  from  their  offices  (1844). 
Even  Pius  IX.  repelled  their  reference  to  his  Circular  (§  475)  as  an  act  of 
insolence.  ('/*)  With  regard  to  mixed  marriages,  the  most  rigid  interpretation 
of  the  Brief  of  1830  has  been  adopted  as  the  rule  of  action,  but  the  possibil- 
ity of  a  ceremony  performed  by  Protestants  is  conceded  and  acted  upon,  (x) 
In  this  controversy  the  Catholic  Church  has  exhibited  a  powerful  self-reli- 
ance, (y)  which  might  proceed  so  far  as  to  threaten  once  more  a  division  of 
Germany.  In  other  countries,  where  the  circumstances  were  similar  to  those 
which  existed  in  Prussia,  the  clergy  were  obliged  to  make  use  of  the  same 
influences,  (z)  In  Wurtemhcrg^  when  the  ministry  proclaimed  that  all  those 
priests  should  be  displaced  who  refused  to  solemnize  mixed  marriages  accord- 
ing to  the  law  of  180G,  which  provided  that  both  Churches  should  be  placed 
on  an  equal  footing,  Bishop  KtUcr  of  Rottenburg  (d.  1840),  an  old  and  faith- 
ful servant  of  the  gc)vernment,  was  induced  to  present  a  proposition  (Nov. 
18,  1841)  in  the  assembly  of  the  states,  in  which  the  grievances  of  the  differ- 
ent parties  were  set  forth.  This  provided  that  the  free  exercise  of  those 
rights  which  the  civil  authorities,  in  direct  opposition  to  the  essential  objects 
of  the  constitution  of  the  Catholic  Church,  had  exercised,  should  now  be 
restored  to  the  Church  and  its  bishops.  In  both  Chambers,  though  in  differ- 
ent ways,  the  full  right}  of  the  government  were  acknowledged,  and  a  con- 
fidence was  expressed  that  it  would  remove  every  well-founded  complaint 
But  an  anonymous  letter  filled  with  threats  was  repelled  with  disgust  even 
by  the  Catholic  party.* 

§  475.     The  German  ChitrcJi  since  1848. 

From  the  revolution,  the  clergy  obtained  charters  which  were  partially 
fulfilled  even  when  the  reaction  took  place,  in  consequence  of  their  agree- 
ment with  political  parties  hostile  to  each  other.  Although  the  expulsion  of 
the  Jesuits  and  their  allies  from  Austria,  and  their  exclusion  from  all  Ger^ 
man  territories,  had  been  resolved  upon  in  the  first  glow  of  popular  feeling, 

u)  BrL  KZ.  1S42  N.  86. 

v)  Ueber  don  Friuden  unter  d.  Kirclie  n.  d.  Staaten.  Miiost  1848.  2  ed. 

?r)  Bonner  Zeitschr.  1S4S.  P.  4.  Actenstucke  x.  gob.  Oesch.  d.  Uermesfan.  by  Elvenid^  BnL 
1S45.  Stupp,  die  letzten  Hcrmesianer.  Siegcn,  1S44.  Comp.  Brans,  Rep.  1S46.  toL  YIL  pi  209aBL— 
BrL  KZ.  1S47.  N.  72, 

or)  Brl.  KZ.  1S41.  N.  87.  1S42.  N.  81. 

y)  J.  V.  OorreA,  K  u.  Staat  nach  Ablauf  d.  Coiner  Irmng.  Weissenb.  1S42. 

c)  Die  kath.  Zustiinde  in  Baden.  lUtiab.  1S41.  On  the  other  ride:  Kebenius,  die  katb.  Zastandt 
In  Baden.  Carlsr.  1$42.    Der  Btreit  u.  gem.  Ehen.  u.  d.  KHoheitsrecht  im  O.  Badeo.  Karlar.  1S47. 

•  A-  KZ.  1842.  N.  08.  108.  114-116.  128-126.  Brl.  KZ.  1842.  N.  6.  28.  80.  6(».  6&  JT.  J.  Matt, 
CaUiolica,  Mlttlieill.  a.  d.  Qesc!i.  d.  kath.  K.  in  Wurt  Tab.  1841.  Briefe  zweier  Freunde  a.  d.  Motion 
d.  B.  V.  Kott.  Stuttg.  1842.  2  ed.  Xcacste  Denkscb.  d.  WOrt  Btaatsrcg.  an  d  rum.  StohL  Belenebtct 
8cbaffb.  1844. 


CHAP.  YL    GATH.  CnUBCH  TILL  185a.    $  475.  OEBMANT  SINCE  1848.       641 

it  was  regarded  as  a  permanent  law  of  the  Grerman  nation.  Jesnit  missions 
then  traversed  the  ooantry  (after  1850),  and  penetrated  districts  densely 
populated  by  Protestants.  («)  With  the  view  of  forming  an  imposing  author- 
ity for  determining  political  and  social  questions  on  Catholic  principles,  a 
popular  society  was  commenced  at  Cologne,  and  named  after  Pius  IX.  (Aug., 
1848).  At  the  suggestion  of  the  pope,  and  in  consequence  of  the  altered 
state  of  the  times,  though  not  without  some  resistance  and  occasional  relapses, 
the  political  and  democratic  tendency  of  these  Pius- Unions  on  the  Rhine 
was  given  up,  and  their  general  object  becune  the  promotion  of  all  Catholic 
interests.  Branches  of  this  organization  were  extended  to  a  great  distance, 
bnt  they  had  no  permanent  place  of  meeting,  and  their  annual  assemblies 
itinerated  from  place  to  place.  (/>)  But  the  General  Assembly  at  Vienna 
(1858)  found  that  the  masses  were  not  attracted  toward  them,  and  that  the 
spectators  at  their  meetings  were  always  the  same,  {c)  The  German  bishops, 
at  a  conference  in  WarUburg  (Nov.,  1848),  proclaimed  that  the  Churcb,  in 
living  connection  with  its  Holy  Father,  had  not  abandoned  the  work  of  re- 
generating their  native  land ;  that  it  accepted  with  confidence  the  assurance 
that  all  should  have  liberty  of  conscience ;  that  it  would  now  enter  upon  the 
full  enjoyment  of  the  independence  which  had  so  long  been  crippled ;  and 
that  while  it  maintained  its  divine  right  to  educate  its  members  from  the 
common  to  the  high  school,  it  would  devote  itself  to  the  advancement  of 
true  progress  by  tlie  elevation  of  science,  the  establishment  of  ecclesiastical 
discipline,  and  the  restoration  of  the  synodal  system.  ((/)  Accordingly,  trust- 
ing to  a  sacred  influence  pervading  the  present  age,  and  which  no  secular 
power  could  withstand,  they  put  forth  a  series  of  demands  upon  the  govern- 
ments, that  in  spite  of  the  existing  law  and  the  modern  state,  the  ideal  of  the 
canon  law  which  had  never  been  renounced  should  now  be  realized,  (e)  In 
Atuftria,  the  ecclesiastical  law  of  the  Emperor  Joseph  was  abandoned  in  the 
attempt  to  carry  out  the  idea  of  the  two  Schwartzenbergs,  according  to 
which  the  mutually  conflicting  nationalities  were  to  be  held  together  under 
the  house  of  Ilapsburg  by  the  interest  of  the  episcopate,  and  all  that  was 
Catholic  in  German  countries  was  to  be  rallied  around  the  throne  of  his 
apostolic  migesty.  (/)  The  imperial  patent  of  April  18,  1850,  (g)  dispensed 
with  the  requirement  that  all  papal  and  episcopal  edicts  should  have  the  con- 
sent of  the  state  to  their  promulgation,  made  the  clergy  independent  of  the 
secular  authorities  and  proportionally  dependent  upon  the  bishops,  and  abol- 
ished every  thing  which  had  impeded  the  exertion  of  the  penal  powers  of  the 
Church.  The  right  of  nominating  the  bishops  was  reserved  by  the  emperor 
to  himself,  as  one  which  had  descended  from  his  ancestors,  and  which  he 
promised  to  exercise  for  the  good  of  the  Church,  and  with  the  counsel  of  the 

a)  K.  A.  /.eibhrandy  d.  Miss.  d.  Jes.  a.  Bedomptorlsten  in  DeatschL  o.  d.  ev.  Wahrh.  Stattg. 
1851. 

h)  Brl.  KZ.  1S4S.  N.  64.  77. 1849.  N.  41.  618.         o)  D.  A.  Z.  ISSa  N.  251. 

d)  BrL  KZ.  1848.  N.  92.  99.  101.    A  KZ.  184a  N.  SOOai 

e)  O.  Mejer,  d.  dt  KFrclb.  u.  d.  kQnfllge  kath.  Partel.  Lpa.  184SL    C,  KnUa,  d.  kjUh.  Hierftrohit 
in  d.  dt  StMten  a.  1848.  IlaL  18.^2. 

/)  ActenstQcke,  d  biechofl.  Ventamml.  za  Wlen  betr.  Wlen,  1850.  (by  Lonotict^  IHr  Joaephift- 
moB  XL  d.  kalB.  Verordn.  v.  18b  Apr.  A  d.  Ung.  Wlen,  1851. 
g)  BrL  KZ.  1860.  N.  84iL 
41 


642  MODEBN  CHURCH  HI8T0BT.    PEB.  ¥L    A.  D.  l<4S-196a 

bishops.    The  prospect  of  a  more  perfect  regnlation  bj  a  ooDcordat  was  also 
held  out.    And  yet  such  was  the  state  of  things  during  the  wars  in  Hungary 
and  Italy,  that  bishops  were  sometimes  imprisoned,  and  priests  were  hnng. 
In  Bavaria^  the  national  bishops  demanded  (A)  the  complete  execution  of  the 
concordat  for  the  adjustment  of  the  ecclesiastical  and  civil  powers,  for  on 
this  they  professed  to  think  the  welfare  of  Europe  depended.     For  this  pur- 
pose they  asked  for  the  recognition  of  certain  rights  as  inalienable  to  the 
Church,  the  possession  of  which  would  have  threatened  to  render  the  clergy 
not  only  independent^  but  superior  to  the  civil  power.    In  its  reply,  (J)  the 
government  refused  to  surrender  its  position,  that  the  royal  assent  was  indis- 
pensable to  ecclesiastical  edicts,  to  investitures  of  livings  by  bishops,  and  to 
missions  by  foreigners,  and  demanded  that  no  change  should  be  made  in  the 
administration  of  Church  property,  and  that  every  member  of  the  Church 
should  have  a  right  to  appeal  to  the  sovereign  for  protection  against  sU 
abuses  of  ecclesiastical  power.     Only  such  decisions  of  the  ecclesiastical 
courts  as  exercised  no  influence  upon  civil  relations,  were  exempted  from  the 
necessity  of  having  the  royal  confirmation ;  and  with  respect  to  the  royal 
patronage  of  benefices,  and  to  the  school  system,  it  was  agreed  that  the  opin- 
ions of  the  bishops  should  be  consulted.    The  Catholic  party  thus  found  that 
the  government  had  conceded  only  non-essential  points,  and  had  maintained 
a  position  which  had  been  abandoned  even  in  some  Protestant  states.    After 
Prxtma  had  proclaimed  the  independence  of  the  Church  (Dec.  6,  1846),  the 
bishops,  instead  of  complying  with  the  invitation  of  the  Minister  to  enter 
into  some  definite  arrangement  with  the  state,  published  a  memorial  (Aug., 
1849),  {I)  in  which  they  claimed,  as  the  necessary  result  of  the  independence 
granted ;  that  all  Church  property  should  be  transferred  to  their  hands ;  that 
the  state  should  exert  no  influence  in  the  appointment  of  ecclesiastical  offi- 
cers ;  that  the  complete  direction  of  the  education  of  the  Catholic  clergy,  and 
of  Catholic  schools,  should  be  committed  to  tliem ;  and  that  the  sacrament 
of  man'iage  should  be  allowed  to  be  administered  without  any  reference  to 
the  civil  law.    The  Constitution  (Jan.  81,  1860)  left  the  principle  of  indepen- 
dence as  it  was,  and  allowed  all  persons  freely  to  hold  intercourse  with  eccle- 
siastical superiors,  but  subjected  the  promulgation  of  ecclesiastical  edicts  to 
the  same  restrictions  as  were  imposed  upon  all  other  publications,  and  relin- 
quished the  investiture  of  ecclesiastical  officers  only  so  £eu*  as  they  did  not 
depend  upon  patronage,  or  some  special  legal  title.    But  since  that  time,  the 
government  has  made  a  series  of  concessions,  (/)  some  of  which  relate  even 
to  the  oath  of  allegiance  to  the  constitution,  (m)     The  limitation  of  theo- 
logical studies  in  foreign  Jesuit  institutions,  and  of  the  Jesuit  missions,  wis 
again  discussed  (1852),  and  the  mildest  construction  given  of  it  which  the 
language  would  allow,  (n)    A  small  Catholic  party  was  formed  in  the  Cham- 

h)  DenkBch.  der  v.  1-fiO.  Get  1850,  za  VtejtAng  Tenammelton  Enbiachufe  a.  Bkeh.  Bajtni' 
Manicb,  1850.  4         0  Of  April  8, 1850:  AUg.  Z.  18S8.  N.  11& 

k)  Printed  in  tbe  KAtholik.  Msyenoe,  Prooeedings  of  the  Cfaambera  in  S«pt :  Brl.  KZ.  IStt.  H. 
84m.  S&  S9.  1800.  N.  4 

0  //(!««>,  ev.  prot  K.  d.  dt  Belcha.  p.  899n.    JTniM,  p.  18& 

m)  Bri.  KZw  1850.  N.  4  88.  808.  Der  Confltct  d.  preosfli  Beg;  m.  d.  kafth.  Btaoh.  In  Belr.  d.  yl^ 
CuMingKidefl.  Lpa  1850.         n)  Bri.  KZ.  1862.  N.  68.  80a.  108. 


CHAP.  YL    CATH.  CnUBCH  TILL  1998.    %  475.  PRUSSIA.    MEOHLKNBURO.    643 

bera,  which  did  not  scruple  to  connect  itself  with  the  Right  or  the  Left, 
according  to  circnrastances ;  and  as  the  government  were  obliged  to  mle  by 
a  party,  these  were  often  strong  enongh  to  give  the  preponderance  where 
they  pleased.  But  a  complete  independence  of  the  clergy  was  not  effected, 
for  a  general  dislike  was  felt  to  the  establishment  of  an  independent  sacerdo- 
tal power,  subject  only  to  a  foreign  sovereign,  whose  decisions  were  formed 
by  divine  authority,  and  were  regarded  by  the  bishops  as  their  rule  of  right, 
to  which  the  heretical  ruler  of  so  many  ancient  ecclesiastical  countries  would 
be  tolerable  only  as  a  matter  of  necessity,  and  by  which  a  portion  of  the 
people  would  be  so  educated,  that  very  soon  a  second  Westphalian  Peace 
would  become  indispensable.  Even  the  complaints  from  Posen  respecting 
the  non-Ailfilment  of  the  conceded  right  to  spiritual  jurisdiction,  the  admin- 
istration of  Church  property,  and  the  Protestantizing  and  denationalizing  the 
schools,  (o)  were  not  regarded.  When  Arnoldi^  Bishop  of  Treves,  required 
(March  12,  15,  1858)  the  pastors  under  his  jurisdiction  to  allow  of  mixed 
marriages  only  when  the  non-Catholic  party  promised  upon  oath  to  have  all 
the  children  to  be  educated  in  the  Catholic  faith,  and  even  then  to  withhold 
the  ecclesiastical  benediction,  {ji)  a  general  astonishment  was  expressed  at 
this  extravagant  application  of  the  papal  enactment  of  1880.  The  king  pro- 
cLiimed,  that  every  officer  of  his  army  who  contracted  marriage  under  such 
dishonorable  conditions,  should  be  immediately  dismissed  from  service.  The 
general  belief  that  an  apostolical  brief  of  such  a  tenor  had  been  issued  to  all 
die  Prussian  bishops,  was  partially  corrected  at  Treves ;  and  it  was  shown 
that  an  attempt  had  been  made  to  ascertain  whether  such  a  proceeding  would 
be  then  tolerated  in  Prussia,  by  such  a  limitation  imposed  upon  each  bishop 
by  the  Propaganda  at  the  renewal  of  his  quinquennial  faculties  (p.  460).  [q) 
In  Jff^A/^/iftwr^-Schwerin,  the  return  to  orthodoxy  which  was  favored  by  the 
higher  classes,  was  in  some  instances  carried  too  far ;  and  a  landed  proprietor 
who  had  recently  become  a  Catholic,  employed  a  priest  of  Mayenoe  as  his 
domestic  chaplain.  This  priest  was  conveyed,  by  order  of  the  government 
(Sept.,  1852),  out  of  the  country,  on  the  ground  that  the  stated  employment 
of  a  priest  was  not  implied  in  the  privilege  of  domestic  worship,  and  that 
the  Catholic  worship  was  tolerated  merely  by  an  arrangement  with  the  sov- 
ereign (1788,  1809,  1811),  under  certain  local  restrictions,  (r)  A  complaint 
with  respect  to  this  proceeding,  founded  upon  the  sixteenth  article  of  the 
Act  of  Confederation,  was  sent  back  by  the  diet  in  accordance  with  the  ex- 
isting law,  ond  by  the  Diet  of  the  Confederation  on  the  ground  of  incompe- 
tencyi  («)  The  five  bishops  of  the  Ecclesiastical  Province  of  the  Upper 
Rhine  {t)  disclosed  also  to  their  respective  governments  what  they  regarded 
as  essential  to  the  ecclesiastical  independence  promised  them,  viz. :  free  inter- 

a)  Promomf>rla  betr.  d.  Bceintrucht  d.  kath.  K.  im  O.  PoAen.  Poa.  184S.  t 

/>>  UrL  KZ.  1S5A.  N.  83.  86.  45. 

q)  I).  A.  Z.  1658.  N.  161.-A.  KZ.  1958.  N.  184. 

r)  {A.  W.  a.  iSihroeUr,)  Die  kath.  Rel.  Uebang  in  Meckl.  Geschichtl.  n.  rechtllch.  Jena,  1S59L  On 
the  (ither  band :  J.  T.  B.  v.  Unde^  Q.  d.  recbU.  OleicbstelL  d.  cbr.  BcL  Parteien  in  d.  dt  Bnnde«t 
intb.  in  MeckL  Oieas.  1891 

«)  BrL  KZ.  1898.  N.  100.  195&  N.  50.    D.  A.  Z.  1892.  N.  4AL 

<)  For  them :  M.  £<tf^er,  in  Sacben  d.  oberrb.  KProT.  m.  Actenat  Frefb.  1806.    F,  JHem,  kireb- 


644  MODEBN  CHURCH  HISTORT.    FEB.  VL    A.  D.  1018-1898. 

course  with  Rome ;  the  validity  of  papal  and  episcopal  edicts,  without  the 
concurrence  of  the  states ;  the  unrestrained  adminbtration  of  Church  pro- 
perty ;  the  necessity  of  the  consent  of  the  hishop  to  the  instruction  g^ven  in 
schools  of  all  kinds ;  the  establishment  of  seminaries  under  the  caro  of  the 
bishop ;  an  alteration  of  the  academical  studies,  and  of  the  chapter,  so  as  to 
make  them  conform  to  the  principles  of  the  canon  law ;  a  recognition  of  the 
episcopal  right  to  examine  their  clergy,  to  the  exclusion  of  an  examination 
by  the  state ;  the  investiture  of  all  clerical  ofScers  by  the  bishop,  as  far  as 
was  consistent  with  a  well-established  right  of  patronage ;  the  restoration  of 
the  episcopal  right  to  control  priestly  functions  and  popular  missions ;  and 
the  unrestrained  exercise  of  the  power  of  punishing  all  members  of  the 
Church,  without  being  subject  to  an  appeal  to  the  civil  authorities,  (u)  The 
government  of  Darmatadt  refrained  from  enforcing  the  institution  of  the 
candidate  whom  it  preferred  fur  the  see  of  Mayence,  and  who  had  been 
elected  by  the  chapter  in  the  informal  way  sanctioned  by  a  frequent  Roman 
usage,  (r)  allowed  a  bishop  to  be  invested  (1849)  who,  it  well  knew,  would  be 
the  leader  of  the  opposition,  and  saw  the  very  last  student  forsaking  its  own 
theological  faculty  at  Giessen,  in  consequence  of  the  constitutional  freedom 
of  studies  proclaimed  in  the  seminary  he  re-established  at  Mayence  (1851.)(w) 
When  the  commissioners  of  the  government  assembled  at  Carlsruhe  made 
them  no  reply,  the  bishops  remarked  that  they  would  in  any  case  act  as  if 
their  demands  had  been  complied  with  (Feb.  22) ;  and  when  these  demands 
were  finally  for  the  most  part  rejected  (March  5,  1858),  {/)  they  declared 
that  they  should  obey  God  rather  than  man ;  and  that,  in  accordance  with 
the  doctrine  generally  received  in  their  Church,  and  the  law  founded  upoa 
it,  they  should  oppose  the  regulations  prescribed  by  the  government,  on  the 
ground  that  their  supreme  ecclesiastical  head  had  long  since  condemned 
them  as  anticatholic  and  illegal  (April  12).  (//)  It  was  determined  that  an 
attempt,  which  should  be  an  example  for  idl  other  places,  should  be  made  in 
Badai,  where  the  revolution  had  been  most  radical,  and  where  the  youth  of 
the  ruler  presented  the  greatest  hope.  Herman  of  Vicar i^  Archbishop  of 
Friburg,  who,  contrary  to  all  precedent,  had  prohibited  the  funeral  solemni- 
ties proscribed  by  the  government  for  the  late  Grand  Duke,  on  account  of 
the  course  that  prince  had  pursued  toward  the  Church  (1852),  (z)  by  his  own 
authority  nominated  a  pastor  for  Constance  and  an  ecclesiastical  council,  had 
the  seminaries  examined  without  a  commissioner  from  government,  and  thrett- 
ened  to  excommunicate  the  members  of  the  supreme  council  of  the  Church,  un- 
less they  would  either  act  according  to  the  episcopal  memorial,  or  resign  their 
ofinces.    Ue  was  admonished  by  the  minbtry  (Oct.  31, 1858)  to  revoke  thew 

licb-poL  Blatter  a.  i  oberrh.  KPr.  Stuttg.  1858.  Against:  &  R  Leu,  Wamang  v.  Neuer  u.  Ueb»- 
trolbnngen.  Lnz.  1858.  BIscbufl.  Theoricn  u.  posit  Kecht  Stuttg.  1S53.— A.  A,  Wamhdnig,  0.  <L 
Conflict  d.  Eplscopats  d.  oberrb.  KProv.  Erl.  185a 

u)  Memorial  of  Marcb,  1851,  in  Lieber,  p.  ISss.    Abstract:  BrL  KZ.  1S51.  N.  45. 

v)  Leop.  Schmid,  Q.  d.  J  ungate  Mainzer  Bischofswahl.  Gieaa.  2  ed.  1850.  Comp.  Ibid,  QfUL  d. 
Catholicism,  o.  grundl.  d.  chr.  Irenik.  Oioss.  1848.  vol.  L 

IT)  BrL  KZ.  1851.  N.  45.         or)  Decree  of  the  Baden  Gov.  In  Lieber,  p.  47s». 

y)  Brl.  KZ.  1858.  N.  88.  Tlie  reasons  for  the  Act  of  Jnne  18:  Denksch.  d.  Episcopates  d.  obcni 
KPr.  in  Bezng  a.  d.  WOrt  Bad.  Ucas.  u.  Naas.  EntacbUeasnng  y.  5.  Man.  Fr«ib.  185a. 

a)  Brl.  KZ.  ISn.  N.  88flL  40. 69. 


CUAP.  VL    OATH.  OHUBGH  TILL  185a    S  475.  BADEN.    S  476.  SWITZERLAN  D.    645 

actfi,  which  were  opposed  to  the  laws  he  had  sworn  to  observe,  and  the  eccle- 
siastical constitution  which  had  been  peacefully  in  force  for  half  a  centnry ; 
but  he  replied,  that  he  coald  no  longer  yield  obedience  to  laws  in  conflict  with  the 
right  of  ecclesiastical  self-government  guarantied  by  international  treaties,  and 
which  annihilated  the  order  Christ  had  bestowed  upon  the  Church.  The 
government  then  appointed  an  officer  (Nov.  7),  whose  indorsement  was  made 
indispensable  to  the  validity  of  all  archiepiscopal  edicts ;  those  clergymen 
who  ventured  to  obey  such  edicts,  regardless  of  this  arrangement,  were  threat- 
ened with  punishment  by  the  police,  and  those  who  obeyed  the  government 
were  assured  of  its  protection.  Tlie  archbishop  dismissed  the  officer  of  tho 
government  with  his  excommunication  (Nov.  10);  published  a  haughty  pastoral 
epistle  (Nov.  11),  in  which  he  expressed  a  desire  of  martyrdom;  openly  chal- 
lenged the  ministry — though,  as  was  proper  under  a  constitutional  govern- 
ment, only  the  ministry — to  a  war ;  protested  against  this  ministerial  inter- 
ference, proceeding  from  Protestant  views,  with  his  holy  office ;  uttered  an 
excommunication,  to  be  read  from  every  pulpit,  against  each  member  of  the 
supreme  ecclesiastical  council  (Nov.  14);  and  gave  orders  that  this  matter 
should  be  explained  to  the  people  in  the  parish  churches  on  four  Sundays,  on 
the  basis  of  tho  episcopal  memorial  and  tho  pastoral  epistle,  (a)  The  govern- 
ment did  not  venture  to  lay  hands  upon  the  aged  archbishop,  but  the  subor- 
dinate executors  of  his  will  were  fined  and  imprisoned.  These  imprison- 
ments, however,  often  involved  the  members  of  the  congregations,  and  could 
not  be  carried  out  against  the  multitude.  Contributions  also  flowed  in 
from  abroad,  amply  sufficient  to  make  up  for  all  fines,  and  for  any  retention 
of  revenues.  But  the  Catholic  people  could  not  be  aroused  by  the  fanatical 
pamphlets  scattered  among  them,  (h)  to  make  any  very  imposing  demonstra- 
tion ;  the  councils  of  the  congregations,  and  even  clergymen,  prayed  to  be 
excused  from  the  not  very  edifying  four  discourses,  and  the  archbishop  was 
obliged  to  depose  a  number  of  deacons.  The  pope,  however,  higlily  extolled 
his  remarkable  firmness  against  a  government  which  was  continually  worry- 
ing the  Church ;  (e)  and  almost  all  German,  Belgian,  and  French  bishops 
have  expressed  their  joyful  approbation  of  the  archbishop's  course,  and 
joined  with  him  in  directing  that  solemn  prayers  should  be  ofiered  up  in 
their  chorches  against  the  persecutors  of  the  Church. 

§  476.     The  Su^iss. 

L.  SneQ.^  C  W,  Qikck^  il  A.  Utnnt^  pregrn.  Erzahl.  d.  kirobl.  Ereifrn.  In  d.  kath.  Schw.  Mannh. 
185<K  2  yol&— Die  Kizn.  Curio  u.  <L  kirchL  Wlrrcn  d.  Schw.  Offenb.  1841.  Die  SchwetztT  Jenalten- 
ftago  Id  Ktaato-  n.  volkerrechtl  Bodeut  (Scbwegler,  Jabrb.  1845.  H.  8.)  QeKrb.  d.  Je«ult«iikitnipre8  Id 
d.  8«hwe1z.  Z&r.  1845.— TQb.  Qtiartalscbr.  188(\  P.  4.  F.  Ilurttr,  d.  Befdndang  d.  kath.  K.  In  d. 
Schw.  K  1831.  8chaffh.  1842&  4  Abth. 

According  to  ancient  usage,  the  Swiss  had  a  metropolitan  connection, 
some  with  Besanqon,  and  others  with  Mentz,  and  of  course  sympathized  with 
these  churches  in  their  tendencies  to  freedom.  The  connection  of  the  former 
portion  in  the  western  part  of  Switzerland  with  the  Galilean  Church,  was 


a)  Orig.  Docc :  D.  A.  Z.  IS.'M.  N.  258.  968.  27a  279.    Append.  280.  80SL    A.  KZ.  1868.  N.  18«(i& 

b)  "  Katholiken,  habt  acht  I  *< 

e)  Allocution  of  Dee.  19 :  D.  A.  Z.  18M.  N.  & 


646  MODEBN  CHUBCH  HISTORY.    FEB.  YL    A.  Di  1M8-18Q& 

broken  off  by  tbe  revolution.    The  most  important  part  of  the  confederacy 
belonged  to  the  bishopric  of  Constance^  and  had  received  from  that  source 
not  only  an  economical  administration  of  their  affairs,  but  protection  against 
the  claims  of  the  nuncio  at  Lucerne.    Tlie  people  in  this  part  were  now  en- 
joying much  prosperity  under  the  influence  which  Wessenburg  exerted  for 
the  improvement  of  the  people  and  the  clergy.    Hence,  when  a  political 
reaction  took  place  in  1814,  the  nuncio  thought  a  favorable  time  had  come 
for  effecting  a  separation  of  Switzerland  from  Constance.    Pleased  with  the 
promise  of  an  independent  national  diocese,  the  Confederates  applied  for  a 
division  at  Rome,  and  in  violation  of  every  canonical  form,  Pius  VII.  hastily 
rent  asunder  a  connection  which  had  existed  for  a  thousand  years,  (a)    As 
almost  every  canton  was  anxious  to  have  the  national  bishopric  within  its 
bounds,  and  hopes  were  secretly  encouraged  in  each,  the  administration  of 
ecclesiastical  affairs  came  into  the  hands  of  a  vicar-general  appointed  by  tbe 
pope,  the  Jesuits  got  the  control  of  all  education  in  Freiburg  and  in  the 
Yalais,  and  Switzerland  became  the  headquarters  of  the  hierarchy.    KelUr 
of  Lucerne,  who  about  this  time  swore  that  this  party  should  never  obtain 
the  victory  as  long  as  he  continued  a  magistrate,  was  soon  after  foond  dead 
in  the  waters  of  the  Keuss  (181C).    After  tedious  intriguer,  it  was  decided 
that  a  few  small  dioceses  should  in  some  instances  be  continued,  and  in  oth- 
ers bo  newly  formed  (1828) ;  and  all  of  them,  instead  of  being  placed  under 
an  archbishop,  were  made  directly  dependent  upon  Rome.    This  victory  soon 
became  of  but  little  importance,  in  consequence  of  the  revolution  of  1830. 
In  the  midst  of  many  controversies  between  the  lay  and  the  clerical  author- 
ities, the  cantons  of  the  progressive  party  united  at  Baden  (1834s.),  to  effect 
by  common  measures  the  establishment  of  a  national  archbishopric;  or  the 
formation  of  a  German  Metropolitan  connection,  a  powerful  supervision  of 
the  Church  by  the  state,  a  free  national  education,  and  the  ^propriation  of 
the  aid  of  the  convents  to  pious  objects  of  general  utility.  (6)    Gregory  XVL 
condemned  these  articles  adopted  by  the  conference  as  an  attempt  to  subject 
the  Church  to  the  laity ;  (c)  the  nuncio  withdrew  from  Lucerne,  and  took  up 
his  residence  at  Schwitz  (Nov.  14,  1836),  and  Catholic  associations  excited 
the  people  against  the  new  constitution  of  the  state.    But  the  Roman  party 
found  in  the  decided  popular  will  which  had  been  awakened  by  this  agency 
among  the  Catholic  or  mixed  cantons,  a  pious  but  rude  sovereign,  while  in 
the  overthrown  aristocracy  of  the  reformed  cantons  they  found  an  important 
ally.    The  Catholic  insurrection  in  Pruntrut  (1835)  was  suppressed  by  Berne. 
The  Catholic  clergy  in  Glarus  refused  to  take  the  oath  of  allegiance  to  tbe 
new  constitution,  except  with  a  reservation  in  favor  of  their  ecclesiastical 
obligations,  which  was  finally  allowed  to  them  (1837).  {d)    St.  Gall  unaai- 
mously  abolished  the  convent  of  Pfaefer  (1888),  the  Catholic  population 
merely  insisting  that  the  property  of  the  convent  belonged  exclusively  to 
their  charitable  institutions,  {e)    Aargau  undertook  the  administration  of  th« 
property  of  its  convents ;  and  when  the  convents  protested  against  such  a 


a)  Archly,  t  KG.  toL  II.  p.  661a&         h)  AoU  hist  eo&  1885.  pi  48U. 

c)  IbicL  p.  898.         d)  Ibid.  \^m.  p.  12508. 

€)  A.  KZ.  1S8S.  N.  46.  A.  Z.  188a  SnppL  N.  817.  Bil.  A.  KZ.  1889.  N.  lOL 


CHAP.  YL    OATH.  CHUBCH  TILL  185&    S47&  SWITZ.    SONDEBBUKD.       647 

oonrae  as  an  icjory  to  themselves,  the  gOTemment  replied  that  tlus  was 
apparently  the  first  step  for  the  aholition  of  oonyents  which  had  been  gaaran- 
tied  in  the  treaty  of  the  leagae  (1837).  (/)  Bat  an  insurrection  of  the 
Catholic  minority,  in  opposition  to  the  constitution  revised  so  as  to  make  it 
conform  to  the  views  expressed  in  the  articles  of  conference,  was  made  use 
of  as  a  reason  for  taking  possession,  by  a  decree  of  the  great  council  (Jan. 
20,  1841),  of  eight  convents,  especially  of  the  wealthy  monastery  of  Muri, 
which  had  been  founded  by  the  house  of  Hapsburg.  It  was  alleged  that 
these  convents  were  used  as  places  of  rendezvous  for  those  who  were  en- 
gaged in  insurrection,  and  their  revenues  were  now  appropriated  to  objects 
connected  with  education  and  charity,  (g)  The  complaint  and  petition  for 
the  re-establishment  of  the  convents  was  under  discussion  for  a  long  time  in 
the  diet  with  doubtful  success,  until  more  than  twelve  cantons  declared 
themselves  satisfied  with  the  concessions  made  by  Aargau  for  the  establish- 
ment of  three  nunneries  (Aug.  31,  1843).  On  the  other  hand,  Lucerne,  at 
the  head  of  those  cantons  favorable  to  Rome,  protested  against  them,  on  the 
ground  that  they  were  an  infraction  of  the  terms  of  the  leagae.  (A)  For  in 
Lucerne,  at  the  revision  of  the  constitution,  the  Romish  party,  under  the 
influence  of  the  robbery  of  the  convents  of  Aargau,  had  obtained  the  as- 
cendency (May  1,  1841),  and  the  nuncio  returned  with  great  pomp  (Jan.  22, 
1843).  Switzerland  was  now  divided  into  two  hostile  parties,  distinguished 
by  their  apparently  external,  though  really  internal  affinities  and  antipathies 
of  Jesuitism  and  Radicalism.  In  the  Valais^  the  liberals  were  overthrown  at 
Trent  (May  1,  1844)  in  a  sanguinary  battle  by  the  sacerdotal  party,  and  the 
ofEairs  of  the  canton  were  then  directed  according  to  the  wishes  of  the  vic- 
tors, (i)  In  Lucerne^  also,  a  majority  of  votes  was  obtained  by  means  of  the 
country  people,  in  favor  of  a  recall  of  the  Jesuits,  and  intrusting  the  theo- 
logical schools  to  their  instruction,  (k).  The  party  which  had  previously  held 
the  supremacy,  was  now  supported  by  the  voluntary  assistance  of  those 
Catholics  who  were  of  the  same  views,  and  by  Protestants  from  all  the  can- 
tons. This  undisciplined  host  of  volunteers,  which  attempted  to  wrest  Lu- 
cerne from  the  possession  of  the  Jesuits  by  a  single  blow,  were  entirely  dis- 
persed (Dec.  8, 1844,  March  31,  1845)  by  the  army  of  the  original  cantons, 
and  all  domestic  opposition  was  overthrown,  (l)  In  view  of  this  victory,  as 
well  as  of  the  dangers  which  threatened  them.  Lucerne  immediately  con- 
cluded a  military  alliance  with  the  three  original  cantons,  and  with  Valais, 
Freiburg,  and  Zug,  for  mutual  protection  agdnst  invasion  or  internal  commo- 
tion, and  the  allies  then  demanded  in  a  threatening  manner  the  restoration 
of  the  convents  of  Aargau.  (m)     The  liberal  party  demanded  the  general 


/)  AcU  hist  ece.  1687.  in  ISTm. 

g)  Die  Aaf  hebung  d.  Aarg.  Kluster.  Denkschr.  an  d.  Eldgenusa.  Stinde.  Aarao,  1841.  4.  (BhdDw. 
lUp.  vol  XXXIII.  p.  170.  264*6.)  Brl.  KZ.  1841.  N.  14. 

h)  Ibid.  1848.  N.  10&  A.  Z.  1843.  N.  178.  247.  297.  884. 

{)  Die  EreignisBe  im  WalL  TransL  of  the  work:  la  oontre>r6vc^  en  Yalala,  by  J/1  Barmann^  with 
Introd.  by  L.  Snell,  ZOr.  1844.  (a  partisan  pubL) 

k)  BrL  KZ.  1844.  N.  93. 1846.  N.  1. 

0  D.  A.  Z.  1844.  N.  852.  Brl.  KZ.  1849.  N.  81.  Das  rotbe  Bftehleln  a  d.  Frcischaarenzug  Bern. 
184a         m)  D.  A.  Zb  1848.  K.  27. 


648  MODERN  OHUROH  HISTORY.    PER.  YL    A.  D.  164S-186& 

expaldon  of  the  Jesuits  as  indispensable  to  the  tranqnillity  of  the  Confed- 
eracy, and  after  many  negotiations,  the  diet  declared  ( Jnly  20,  1847)  by  a 
small  minority  that  the  separate  alliance  (Sonderbund)  was  inconsistent  with 
the  general  confederation,  and  was  therefore  dissolved,  and  that  the  seven  can- 
tons should  be  held  responsible  for  its  continuance,  (n)  To  this  division  into  re- 
ligious parties  was  added,  on  the  one  side,  a  struggle  for  a  more  efficient  unity 
of  the  states,  and  on  the  other,  for  the  maintenance  of  the  sovereign  rights 
of  the  separate  cantons.  Pius  IX.  still  exhorted  them  to  the  cultivation  of 
peace,  (o)  but  he  did  not  venture  on  the  recall  of  tlie  Jesuits  as  tiie  measure 
most  likely  to  reconcile  all  parties,  but  it  appeared  probable  that  a  decision 
could  be  attained  only  by  a  civil  and  religious  war.  A  superior  army  was 
called  into  the  field  by  the  diet,  and  the  miraculous  pennies  purchased  from 
the  Jesuits  to  secure  the  immediate  protection  of  the  Virgin  against  the  bul- 
lets of  the  enemy,  (p)  were  found  insufficient.  The  foreign  aid  was  too 
scanty;  Freiburg  capitulated;  the  small  affair  near  Gislicon  (Nov.  28)  be- 
came as  important  for  the  Protestants  as  that  at  Cappel  once  was  for  the 
opposite  party,  and  all  the  cantons  were  obliged  to  renounce  the  Sonderbund, 
and  submit  to  the  diet.  The  Jesuits  universally  had  fled,  and  from  the  pro- 
perty they  left,  the  conquered  cantons  paid  a  part  of  their  quota  for  the 
expenses  of  the  war.  (q)  These  events  produced  an  important  change  in  the 
administration,  for  in  Lucerne,  in  consequence  of  a  revolution  in  public  sen- 
timent, the  party  which  had  for  years  been  trampled  under  foot  now  gained 
the  ascendency,  and  in  Freiburg,  the  faction  which  had  long  governed  merely 
by  the  aid  of  foreign  arms,  was  now  obliged  to  defend  itself  agdnst  a  series 
of  revolutionary  attempts.  In  1848,  Switzerland  availed  itself  of  the  oppor- 
tunity, wlien  Austria  and  France  had  enough  to  do  at  home,  to  form  itself 
into  a  confederacy.  In  the  new  constitution,  was  secured  liberty  of  con- 
science for  all  the  confessions  recognized  by  the  state,  and  equal  rights  for  all 
citizens ;  the  order  of  tlie  Jesuits  was  excluded  from  the  country,  and  every 
governmental  guarantee  for  the  monasteries  was  withdrawn,  (r)  The  federal 
authorities,  by  a  special  law  respecting  mixed  marriages  (1850),  have  entirely 
divested  them  of  ecclesiastical  restrictions,  have  made  the  education  of  the 
children  dependent  upon  the  will  of  the  father,  and  in  every  instance  have 
permitted  a  Protestant  clergyman  to  solemnize  a  marriage,  when  a  Catholic 
priest  has  refused  to  do  so.  (s)  In  many  cantons,  monasteries  have  been 
either  abolished,  or  condemned  to  die  by  a  gradual  process.  Freiburg,  m 
connection  with  the  four  cantons  in  its  diocese  (Lausanne),  concluded  a  con- 
cordat containing  the  essential  principles  of  the  articles  of  the  Conference 
of  Baden.  (0  The  Bishop  Marilley  sent  forth  secret  and  public  admonitions 
against  the  new  constitution.  When  asked  if  he  would  unconditionally  sub- 
ject himself  to  it,  and  submit  his  public  acts  to  the  approbation  of  the  gov- 
ernment^ he  replied  that  he  would  prefer  death  to  such  a  servitude.  Chillon 
became  once  more  the  prison  of  an  illustrious  captive  (Oct.  29,  1848),  who, 

n)  D.  A.  Z.  1846.  N.  87. 1847.  N.  208.  252. 2W.  299. 

o)  Ibid  1847.  N.  808.         p)  Ibid.  1847.  N.  850. 

q)  Ibid.  N.  844.         r)  Art  44-48.  5a 

9)  BrL  KZ.  1850.  N.  8a  bat  oomp.  1851.  N.  89.         1)  Ibid.  184a  N.  M. 


CHAP.  VL    CATH.  CHURCH  TILL  1858.    )  477.  IRELAND.  649 

however,  soon  exchanged  his  confinement  for  honishment.  (u)  The  holy 
father  wept  with  him,  («)  appealed  to  the  federal  law  with  respect  to  freedom 
of  conscience,  to  Jostif  j  his  attempt  to  secure  the  independence  of  his  clergy, 
and  protested  against  all  aggressions  since  1847  upon  the  rights  of  the 
Church,  (tp)  For  the  sake  of  a  general  reconciliation,  the  Bishop  of  Basle 
recommended  what  had  also  been  proposed  in  a  popular  society,  that  the 
remainder  of  the  debt  for  the  war  of  the  Sonderbund  should  be  paid  by  a 
voluntary  offering,  (x) 

§  477.    Ireland  arid  England. 

Iriflche  Znetnnde.  (Rheinw.  R«p.  vol  XIII.  p.  26888.  XIV,  GSss.)  F.  ff{urier\  Iii  Zust&nd.  (T&b. 
QoarUlacb.  1840.  II.  4.)  K  F,  Vogtl^  pragm.'Gesch.  d.  poL  n.  rel  Yerh.  zw.  EngL  n.  Irl.  Lps.  1842. 
B.  Murray^  Irel.  &nd  her  Church.  Lood.  ed.  8.  1845.  8  vols. — 0.  M^er^  d.  Propaganda  In  EngL 
1651. — 0.  de  Beaumont,  Tlrland  socialc,  politique  ot  rellglcuse.  Par.  1889.  2  vols.  [Ireland,  from  the 
French  oC  Beaumont  by  Taylor,  Lond.  1840.  2  vda.]— V.  O.  Kohl,  [Travels  in  Ireland,  from  the 
Germ.  New  York.  1844.  8.    F.  v.  Baunur,  EngL  in  1885.  in  Letters  from  the  Germ.  Lond.  1889.  8.] 

The  iniquity  of  the  fathers  had  descended  in  the  form  of  a  curse  of  mis- 
ery and  hatred  to  the  sons  both  of  the  spoilers  and  the  spoiled.  The  im- 
portance of  reconciling  seven  millions  of  its  subjects  to  the  state  under  which 
they  lived,  was  fully  acknowledged  by  the  government.  But  the  first  attempt 
which  it  made  to  relieve  them  of  their  burdens,  led  to  an  insurrection  in 
London  (1780).  Every  mitigation  of  their  lot  was  obliged  to  bo  carried 
through  Parliament  with  the  utmost  difficulty,  in  opposition  to  the  selfishness 
of  the  privileged  classes,  and  the  passions  of  the  Protestant  multitude.  The 
Irisli  people  were  under  the  direction  of  CTConnell  (1809-47),  a  demagogue, 
but  one  who  aimed  at  what  was  indispensable.  By  the  aid  of  the  priests,  he 
kept  the  people  in  a  state  of  tremendous  excitement,  which  he  alone  could 
restrain  within  the  bounds  of  the  law.  The  spirit  of  justice  finally  obtained 
the  victory  in  the  bosoms  of  the  English  nation,  while  the  aristocracy  were 
alarmed  at  the  threatening  state  of  despair  in  which  they  beheld  the  Irish 
people.  Constrained  by  this  necessity,  Wellington  was  able  and  was  obliged 
to  accomplish  what  even  Canning  could  not  effect  with  all  the  magic  of  his 
eloquence  in  behalf  of  universal  freedom.  An  act  of  Parliament,  passed  April 
18th,  1829,  presented  a  citizen's  oath  compatible  with  the  Catholic  faith,  by  tak- 
ing which,  every  Catholic  became  eligible  to  a  seat  in  Parliament,  and  with  few 
exceptions  to  all  offices  in  the  state  and  parish,  (a)  But  a  people  who  lived 
as  tenants  in  their  own  country,  with  a  foreign  hierarchy  and  aristocracy, 
and  in  terror  of  starvation  every  winter,  could  see  only  a  distant  hope  in 
concessions  like  this.  When  they  found  the  fulfilment  of  this  hope  still  de- 
layed, the  whole  nation  entered  into  an  open  conspiracy  (1831),  the  tithes 
were  refused,  and  whoever  dared  to  act  contrary  to  the  known  will  of  the 
people,  was  secretly  tried  and  executed.  The  expense  of  collecting  the  tithes 
was  greater  than  they  were  worth.    The  government  received  extraordinary 

u)  Snell,  yoL  IL  2.  p.  SOOss.  Der  Terrorismns  im  K.  Freib.  (Hist  poL  BIL  1858.  toL  XXXL  p. 
749ml)       f>)  BrL  KZ.  1649.  N.  18. 

to)  Ibid.  1848.  N.  86w  108. 1851.  N.  28.         m)  Ibtd.  1852.  N.  20. 

a)  Wy9^  Hist  of  the  late  Cath.  Assoc  Lond.  1829.  8  toIb.  A.  TKHn€r^  SammL  wicht  Aetenst 
X.  Oeeeh.  d.  Emana  d.  Kath.  in  EngL  Mayence,  1885w 


650  MODERN  CHUBCH  HISTORY.    PER.  YL    A.  D.  ltia-18Q& 

powers  from  Parliament  (18d8)  for  putting  down  these  Tiolent  prooeedinga, 
and  ])ropo8ed  to  reform  the  Protestant  Church  of  Ireland.  The  changes  con- 
templated in  this  reform,  were :  the  abolition  of  taxes  for  the  erection  of 
churches ;  the  transfer  of  the  tithes,  with  an  abatement  of  their  amonnt, 
from  the  tenant  to  the  proprietor ;  the  diminution  of  the  number  €i  the 
bishoprics ;  a  tax  upon  all  livings  according  to  their  yalue,  and  the  abroga- 
tion of  all  sinecures,  (b)  In  the  Ilouse  of  Lords,  however,  the  inyiolabilitj 
of  the  property  of  the  Church  was  resolutely  maintained.  The  cause  of  fre^ 
doiu  in  general  became  identified  with  that  of  justice  for  Ireland.  The  lib- 
eral ministry  was  divided  upon  the  proposition  (May  27tb,  1884)  to  apply  the 
surplus  of  ecclesiastical  property  to  objects  of  general  ntihty  in  the  state, 
under  tlio  direction  of  Parliament  (c)  £ven  the  Tory  ministry  und«r  Sir 
Robert  Peel  acknowledged  the  necessity  of  a  reform,  but  contended  that  it 
should  be  without  depriving  the  Church  of  its  property.  The  tithes  were 
again  collected  at  the  point  of  the  bayonet,  and  the  only  son  of  a  widow  was 
shot  down  (Dec.,  1834).  ('/)  The  Peel  ministry  retired,  and  then  Russell  carried 
a  proposition  in  the  lower  Ilouse  (April  7th,  1835),  (e)  which  required  that  all 
ecclesiastical  proi)erty  not  really  needed  for  the  support  of  the  established 
Church,  should  be  applied  to  the  education  of  the  people.  This  principle  of 
appropriation  was  rejected  in  the  upper  Ilouse  as  a  robbery  of  the  altar,  and 
a  commencement  of  the  work  of  destroying  the  establishment.  When  the 
Irish  Church  Bill  was  returned  to  the  lower  House,  it  was  so  mutilated,  that 
this  body  preferred  to  leave  every  thing  in  an  alarming  uncertainty  to 
attempt  inj^  any  change  then  practicable  (Aug.,  1836).  (/)  Lord  Lyndhunt 
wished  to  know  nothing  of  justice  in  behalf  of  aliens  in  faith,  in  blood,  and 
in  manners,  (y)  Tlie  tithe  bill  was  finally  passed  (Aug.,  1838),  without  the 
clause  for  the  appropriation  of  the  surplus.  It  transferred  the  tithes  in  the 
form  of  a  ground  rent,  with  an  abatement  of  25  per  cent.,  to  the  proprietor 
of  the  soil,  and  the  previous  arrears  were  to  be  paid  firom  the  treasury  of  the 
state.  (A)  Even  O^Connell  advocated  this  law,  although  it  was  merely  an 
acyoumment  of  the  question  respecting  the  existence  of  a  Protestant  Church 
supported  by  a  Catholic  people.  To  assist  the  people  in  the  work  of  deliver- 
ance by  their  own  exertions,  the  Dominican  Father  Matthew  (since  1840)  his 
excited  a  prodigious  enthusiasm  in  favor  of  total  abstinence  from  all  intoxi- 
cating drinks,  (/)  and  during  the  spring  of  1843,  O'Connell  was  able  to  collect 
around  himself  hundreds  of  thousands  of  people,  at  what  he  called  lus  mon- 
ster meetings.  The  object  of  these  assemblies  was  to  demand  justice  for 
Ireland,  with  threats  that  if  this  were  denied  them,  the  union  of  the  legisla- 
ture of  the  two  countries  should  be  legally  dissolved,  and  the  jurisdiction  of 
the  Anglo-Saxons  should  be  thrown  off  (repeal).  For  language  used  on  these 
occasions,  he  was  sent  to  prison  by  the  Ilouse  of  Lords,  but  Ireland  was  no 
less  governed  by  him  in  his  confinement  than  before.    The  ministry  of  Sir 


b)  A.  KZ.  1888.  N.  88.  4a  A.  Z.  1S84.  N.  220.  229. 

c)  A.  Z.  1S31  N.  155.         cO  A.  Z.  1385.  N.  4.  SappL  N.  9. 
e)  A.  Z.  1S8-..  N.  110ft. 

/;  A.  Z.  1835.  N.  245. 1S86.  N.  223.  A.  KZ.  1886.  N.  18«.         g)  A.Z.  1884L  8appL  N.  STT. 
A)  A.  Z  1S8S.  N.  191.  199.  206.  2oa  212.  282. 
i)  Brl.  KZ.  1S40.  N.  4. 16.  A.  Z.  1848.  Supplem.  N.  148i. 


CHAP.  TL    CATH.  CHUBOH  TILL  1868.    )  477.  IRELAND  dt  ENGLAND.       651 

Robert  Peel  introdaced  the  Legacy  Bill,  which  allowed  the  Catholic  Church, 
with  the  exception  of  the  monastic  orders,  to  acquire  property  in  its  own 
name,  (k)  and  carried  through  an  act  for  bestowing  a  splendid  endowment 
on  the  seminary  at  Maynooth,  for  the  education  of  the  Catholic  clergy 
(1845).  (/)  A  system  of  common  schools  supported  by  government,  but  care- 
fully avoiding  all  distinction  of  churches,  had  been  some  time  before  (1834) 
established,  and  now  four  royal  colleges  were  founded  by  Parliament  (1847) 
for  higher  education,  but  no  provision  was  made  for  religious  instruction, 
each  sect  being  left  to  secure  its  own  foundation  for  that  purpose  by  volun- 
tary efibrts.  The  opinions  of  the  Irish  episcopacy  were  divided  respecting 
these  schools,  but  the  Archbishop  of  Tuam  excited  the  prejudices  of  the 
pope  against  them  on  account  of  their  destitution  of  religion,  and  they  were 
rejected  (1851).  (m)  Even  the  proposition  of  the  government,  after  having 
abolished  the  last  of  the  old  penal  laws  against  Catholic  worship,  (n )  to  grant 
a  salary  to  their  prelates,  on  condition  that  it  should  have  a  right  to  an  influ- 
ence in  their  election,  was  declined.  Emigration  to  the  New  World  since 
the  last  famine  has  entirely  removed  the  surplus  population  from  the  coun- 
try. The  real  estate  of  the  great  landholders,  which  had  been  brought  to  a 
public  sale  in  consequence  of  enormous  poor  rates,  came  to  a  considerable 
extent  into  the  hands  of  a  Protestant  middle  class.  A  mission  of  a  hundred 
preachers,  belonging  to  different  Protestant  sects  from  London,  in  the  sum- 
mer of  1853,  and  preaching  in  the  streets  as  in  a  heathen  country,  was  the 
occasion  of  more  offence  than  of  edification  to  the  people,  (o)  But  some  per- 
manent missions  have  labored  during  the  last  ten  years  with  no  inconsidera- 
ble success,  by  scriptural  instruction  from  house  to  house,  by  the  distribution 
of  tracts,  and  by  schools  in  different  sections  of  the  country ;  although,  in 
consequence  of  their  supply  of  food  and  work  to  a  hungry  people,  the  con- 
verts were  stigmatized  as  soup-eaters  by  the  Catholic  population,  and  many, 
whose  consciences  had  not  been  carried,  returned  after  a  plentiful  harvest,  or 
when  dying,  to  the  Church  of  their  fathers,  (p)  The  hopes  of  the  Catholics 
in  England  were  much  awakened  in  consequence  of  the  ecclesiastical  stand- 
ing of  some  Puseyites  who  went  over  to  them,  and  the  popular  basis  supplied 
by  immigrants  from  Ireland,  for  the  number  of  these  converts  was  for  oppo- 
site reasons  much  exaggerated  by  Protestant  and  Catholic  public  journals. 
Relying  upon  such  hopes,  Pius  IX.  once  more  took  possession,  as  it  were,  of 
this  lost  territory,  by  appointing,  instead  of  the  four  apostolical  vicariates 
which  had  previously  governed  the  English  Catholics,  a  complete  episcopal 
hierarchy  for  all  England  (Sept.  29,  1860),  under  Cardinal  Wiseman,  the 
learned  and  ingenious  defender  of  his  Church,  as  the  Archbishop  of  West- 
minster, (q)  and  contributions  were  invited  for  the  erection  of  a  splendid 
church  of  St.  Peter  in  the  very  heart  of  London,  (r)  Parliament  could  not 
but  yield  to  the  indignation  of  the  Protestant  community  produced  by  this 

jfe)  D.  A.Z.1S45.N  11. 11         0  A.  KZ.  1345.  N.  82. 
m)  .V.  I).  Z.  1S47.  N.  809.    Synod  of  Tbnrles:  Brl  KZ.  185a  N.  80.  85. 
n)  Brl.  KZ.  1S47.  N.  28.         o)  A.  KZ.  1853.  N.  161 

p)  Ag«in»t  one-9ided  Prot.  acconIlt^  but  still  not  \t§a  one-sided  Itself:  Hist  poL  BU.  1868.  toL 
XXXII.  H.  6.  oomp.  Ev.  KZ.  1S52  N.  92.   BrL  KZ.  1858.  N.  10. 
q)  BrU  KZ.  1850.  N.  9a  r)  Ibid.  1851.  N.  65. 


652  MODEBN  OmJRCH  HISTORY.    PER.  VL    A.  D.  1648-18S8. 

proceeding,  (ft)  but  it  was  difficult  to  devise  any  legal  measure  ag^nst  the 
papal  aggression  which  would  not  apply  equally  to  Ireland.  After  a  pro- 
tracted contest^  however,  the  matter  was  terminated  by  the  adoption  of  Ru9- 
soirs  proposition  (1851),  providing  that  all  papal  edicts,  and  all  jurisdictions, 
rank  or  titles  created  by  them  in  the  United  Kingdom,  should  be  null  and 
void ;  that  every  person  who,  without  legal  authority,  accepted  of  any  eccle- 
siastical title  derived  from  the  name  of  any  place  in  the  kingdom,  should  be 
fined  one  hundred  pounds  for  every  instance  in  which  he  should  make  use  of 
it,  and  that  complaints  might  be  received  fh)m  any  private  individual  with 
respect  to  ofifences  of  this  nature.  (0  A  serious  diflSculty,  however,  appears 
to  have  been  discovered  in  the  way  of  substantiating  such  a  charge,  (u) 

§  478.     Forms  of  Catholicism, 

The  special  friends  of  the  Roman  Curia  and  of  the  bishops  have  become 
more  decidedly  opposed  to  one  another,  under  the  name  of  Ultramontanittt 
and  LiheraU,  Tiie  former  defend  the  infallibility  of  the  pope,  and  the  im- 
possibility of  improving  the  Church,  by  planting  themselves  on  the  ground 
of  established  usages,  and  of  the  necessity  of  an  external  universal  authority. 
This  Romish  Catholicism  was  not  long  since  popular  among  the  lower  classes 
in  Spain,  and  was  there  embraced  with  all  the  earnestness  and  energy  of  the 
national  character.  But  in  consequence  of  the  festivals  of  the  inquisition, 
and  the  political  parties  of  the  day,  it  there  assumed  a  gloomy  and  passiou- 
ate  character.  It  appeared  in  the  most  harmless  form,  until  the  revolution,  in 
Italy,  especially  in  the  south,  where  even  the  i)er8onal  ridicule  heaped  upon 
the  hierarchy,  and  the  more  dangerous  opposition  of  the  commercial  inter- 
ests, were  not  generally  prejudicial  to  the  ecclesiastical  system.  The  sensu- 
ous form  of  a  system  of  saint-worship  was  there  a  matter  of  necessity. 
Illuminations,  rockets,  and  the  roar  of  cannons,  form  necessary  parts  of 
divine  worship,  and  the  miracles  must  annually  be  repeated  at  the  joyful 
festivals.  The  Epistle  of  the  Virgin  Mary  to  the  people  of  Messina  must  be 
read,  {a)  the  domestic  animals  must  be  sprinkled  with  holy  water  under  the 
direction  of  St.  Anthony,  (h)  and  the  lambs  from  whose  wool  the  pallium  is 
woven,  must  receive  a  benediction  at  the  altar  of  St,  Agnes.  Every  thing  is 
there  connected  with  some  joyous  festival,  and  Mary's  tears  are  regarded  as 
at  least  equally  efficacious  in  the  work  of  atonement  with  the  blood  of 
Christ.  The  Church  has  not  done  much  for  the  intellectual  improvement  and 
morals  of  the  people,  but  it  has  kept  up  a  certain  kind  of  discipline,  pro- 
tected cheerful  and  pleasant  customs,  and  never  repressed  the  natural  talents 
of  this  higlily  intellectual  people.  The  clergy,  with  their  oflScious  but  pleas- 
ant inefficiency,  are  only  the  culminating  points  of  the  popular  life,  and  as 
long  as  they  are  undisturbed,  they  are  kindly  disposed.  But  in  Grermany  and 
France,  where  this  party,  as  a  peculior  section  of  Catholicism,  has  been  made 

•)  BrL  KZ.  1S50.  N.  928.  94  101a. 

0  EcclesUstlcal  Titles  Act:   BrL  KZ.  1851.  N.  55.  v)  Ibli  N.  TO. 

a)  Deutsche  Zeltachr.  f.  chr.  WIsa.  1852.  N.  49. 

h)  A.  KZ.  1823.  N.  192.    Tb«  matter  was  prettjr  mnob  as  it  Is  tb«r«  related,  althoagh  I  mw  doUh 
Ing  **  blasphemous  *"  in  it. 


CHAP.  YL  CATH.  CHUBCn  TILL  185&  f  47a  ULTBAM0NTANI8TS.  LIBERALS.    653 

to  feel  that  the  spirit  of  the  times  is  fatal  to  its  interests,  it  has  come  into 
conflict  with  every  kind  of  intellectaal  freedom,  and  every  where  is  abhorred 
by  the  friends  of  liberty.  Hence  the  Ultramontanists  look  with  horror  upon 
all  universities,  the  freedom  of  the  press,  philosophical  studies,  and  the  read- 
ing of  the  Scriptures,  and  they  often  intentionally  encourage  superstition,  or 
at  least  mere  excitements  of  the  fancy,  (r)  In  consequence  of  old  traditions, 
much  impaired  however  by  modern  intelligence,  Bavaria  became  the  prin- 
cipal home  of  this  enthusiasm,  and  after  1888,  its  ministry  fell  completely  under 
its  sway.  The  mild  earnestness  of  the  dying  Bishop  Schwaebl,  and  of  the  king 
himself,  was  sometimes  indeed  aroused  against  the  rigid  Ultramontanism  of 
this  ministry,  when  its  zeal  against  every  thing  of  a  Protestant  nature  did 
violence  to  their  feelings,  but  it  was  not  till  1847  that  it  was  overthrown  by 
a  travelling  danscuse.  {d)  The  Liberals  possessed  much  influence  in  conse- 
quence of  the  education  which  the  clergy  of  Germany  received  at  universi- 
ties where  Protestants  and  Catholics  were  taught  together,  the  protection  of 
the  governments,  and  the  total  disinclination  of  the  spirit  of  the  age  to  all 
forms  of  mental  slavery.  They  demanded  that  public  worship  should  be 
conducted  in  the  language  of  the  people ;  that  the  Scriptures  should  be  freely 
circulated ;  that  instead  of  inculcating  dependence  upon  mere  outward  forms, 
the  education  of  the  people  should  receive  a  spiritual  tendency ;  and  that 
national  churches  and  synods  might  be  so  constituted,  that  the  rights  of  the 
pope  might  remain  merely  honorary,  or  definitely  determined  by  the  consti- 
tution. Such  views  were  sometimes  expressed  only  in  literary  works,  and 
sometimes  through  petitions  and  associations.  From  Silesia,  they  generally 
came  connected  with  disclosures  of  all  kinds  of  abuses,  by  the  learned 
brothere  Theincr^  the  theologian  and  the  canonist,  (f)  The  principal  object 
against  which  almost  every  kind  of  disposition  and  plan  was  directed,  was 
the  celiba^'ij  of  the  clergy.  Petitions  for  its  abolition  have  been  presented  to 
the  episcopal  authorities  by  pastors  in  Silesia  (1826),  and  associations  have 
been  formed  against  it  in  Southern  Germany  (1830).  These  eflbrts,  however, 
have  been  sternly  repelled  by  the  bishops  and  by  the  government  of  Wurtem- 
berg.  (/)  The  chambers  of  Southern  Germany  (since  1824),  to  whom  ad- 
dresses on  this  subject  were  sent  up,  declared  that  they  had  no  jurisdiction 
in  the  case ;  until  finally  the  Chamber  of  Deputies  in  Baden  recommended  that 
the  government  (1831)  should  adopt  suitable  measures  for  the  abolition  of  the 
law  relating  to  celibacy,  (y)    In  France,  priests  were  married  who  had  pre- 

c)  Miraculoas  Med&Is :  PJUtrut^  d.  rel.  L.  in  Frankr.  p.  222.  On  the  other  side :  ActA  hist  eoc. 
1887.  p.  814.    6.  Benedict's  pence:  D.  A.  Z.  1847.  N.  120.  oonnp.  (  480. 

d)  &  Suffenheiin,  Baierns  K.-  u.  Vollcs-Ziistilnde,  Gieas.  1842.  BrL  KZ.  1841.  N.  22.  41. 47.  6& 
1845.  N.  8-2.   D.  A.  Z.  184«.  N.  18.    A.  KZ  1847.  N.  40. 

«)  If.  Amman,  Bostreb.  d.  Hochschale  Freiburg  im  KKechte.  Frelb.  1882-6.  2  Beitr.  {WetmeH' 
b0rg,)  Die  deutache  K.  (Zur.)  1815.  FtUer,  Deutschl.  u.  Rom.  Frkt  1880.  Kopp,  d.  kath.  K  im 
19.  Jbh.  Mentz.  1880.  Mer«y,  sind  Reformen  in  d.  kath.  K.  notbwendig?  Beantw.  ▼.  d.  Pmtoral- 
confer,  za  OfTonbarg.  1882.  2  ed.  verm,  durcb  Belencht  des  dsraaf  erfolgten  Erlassra  des  erzb.  Ordi- 
nariata.  Oil'onb.  1888.  {Ant.  n.  Auff.  ThHntrr,)  Die  kath.  K.  Schlea.  Altenb.  182S.  and  often,  comp 
Ant  Thelner,  ret  Bestreb.  in  d.  kath.  K.  Altenb.  184S.  P.  2.  p.  eew^^J.  R  Uafen^  Miibler  a.  Wes- 
■enb.  o.  Strengkirchllchk.  u.  Liberalism.  Ulm.  1842. 

/)  Erster  8ieg  des  Licbtcs  u.  d.  Fin^emiss.  Han.  182A.  Merkw.  Umlanftchr.  d.  FnTstbirch.  t. 
BresL  Hao.  1827.  Ueber  d.  Bildong  e.  Ycreins  fl  d.  kirchl  Anf  heb.  d.  C  libatge*.  Ulm.  1881.  A.  KZ 
188L  N.  7a  121 174.  19a       g)  A.  KZ.  1828.  N.  78. 108.-1881.  N.  174a.  18L  188. 1882.  N.  &  147. 


654  MODEBN  CIIURCn  HISTORY.    FEB.  YI.    A.  D.  1MS-189& 

viously  taken  the  vow.  The  French  courts  declared,  that  even  the  marriage 
of  priests  who  had  given  np  the  duties  of  their  office  was  invalid,  (h)  The 
Lihernis,  in  some  instances  as  Protestant  Catholics,  were  the  first  who  took 
part  in  Protestant  literature  and  science.  As  Fehronins  had  assailed  and 
shaken  the  fundamental  principles  of  ecclesiastical  law,  BI<ih  also  undermined 
the  principles  of  ecclesiastical  faith.  (?)  In  place  of  the  only  saving  Church, 
he  wislied  to  substitute  the  only  saving  religion  found  in  every  pions  heart,  (h) 
Others  labored  with  honest  intentions  in  behalf  of  Catholicism.  Instead  of 
the  religion  of  the  monks  and  the  virtues  of  the  saints,  WerJcmeister  (d,  1828), 
who  had  acquired  an  education  of  an  entirely  Protestant  character  in  the 
Benedictine  convent,  held  up  the  religion  of  the  gospel  and  the  moral  system 
wliicli  Gellcrt  had  taught.  (/)  Uirseher  presented  the  simple  faith  of  the 
Bible,  in  contrast  with  the  scholastic  system  of  the  Church,  but  he  submitted 
to  the  ]>apal  judgment  upon  his  treatise  for  the  reconciliation  of  the  Catholic 
Church  with  the  science  of  the  present  day.  (m)  Hug  vied  with  the  Protes- 
tant theologians  in  ingenious  investigations  with  regard  to  the  canon  of  the 
New  Testament,  (n)  and  Schoh  turned  attention  once  more  to  the  manuscripts 
which  had  been  recently  obtained  from  Constantinople,  (o)  Occupying  an 
intermediate  position  between  the  Romish  and  the  Liberal  form  of  Catho- 
licism, inclining  sometimes  toward  the  first  and  sometimes  toward  the  latter, 
according  to  the  personal  preferences,  (/?)  the  position,  or  the  sincerity  of  the 
individual,  an  Ideal  school  began  to  make  its  appearance,  which  pointed  out 
the  religious  ideas  involved  in  the  Catholic  dogmas  and  usages,  and  endeav- 
ored to  reconcile  Catholicism  with  modern  science  and  improvements,  (q)  It 
proceeded  from  France  in  the  form  of  a  poetic  and  artistic  glorification  of 
the  Church  (§  444).  German  philosophy  was,  sometimes  in  the  spirit  of 
faith,  and  sometimes  in  the  allegorical  strain,  incorporated  with  the  Catholic 
doctrines,  (r)  GOrres  (b.  177C),  who  possessed  powerftil  original  talents,  and 
united  with  them  a  poetical  and  philosophical  temperament,  attempted,  with- 
out regard  to  historical  truth,  once  more  to  conjure  np  the  spirits  of  the  mid- 
dle ages.  Wherever  a  thorough  theological  discipline  was  permitted,  this 
Catholicism  vindicated  itself  by  showing  what  the  Church  had  been  to  past 
ages,  and  what  it  always  may  bo  to  the  human  mind.    In  Germany,  this  ten- 


h)  A.  KZ.  1829.  N.  la  88. 183.  1888.  N.  44.  65. 

i)  Kritische  Qeach.  d.  kircbl.  Unfehlbarkeit  FrkC  1791. 

k)  (KtU^r,)  Katholikon.  F&r  alle  unter  Jeder  Form  das  Eine.  8  ed.  Aana.  1883. 

0  An  d.  unbe!<cheidenen  Verehrer  d.  Heiilgeo,  beSL  Maria.  Uanau.  180L  Predigten.  Ulm.  ISlte 
8  vols. 

m)  Ue.  d.  Verb.  d.  Er.  zu  d.  tbcol.  Scbolastik.  Tub.  1828.  Die  klrchllcben  Zaattnde  d.  Q«geDW. 
Tub.  1849.  8  ed.   Brl.  KZ.  1890.  N.  10. 

n)  EInl.  in  d.  Schrr.  d.  N.  T.  BtuU^c  a.  Tab.  (180&-21.)  1826.  2  vols. 

o)  Gosch.  d.  Textes  d.  N.  T.  Lps.  l<aa   N.  T.  gr.  Lpa.  1880-B.  2  Tlu  4. 

p)  T^schimer,  Briefe  iL  Btl  n.  PoliUk.  Lpa.  182a  Kahier,  Bdtr.  t,  d-  Ttfvachen,  d«ii  Kath.  n 
idealiairen.  Kngab.  182a  A.  KZ.  1882.  N.  15S. 

g)  P.  B.  Zlmmer,  phll.  ReligionsL  Landsb.  1806.  O.  M.  KUin,  Darat  d.  phU.  ReL  u.  Slttonl 
Barab.  1818.  F.  Bander,  spccuL  Dogmat  Stuttg.  1828aa.  2  P.  F.  A.  StawUnmutUr,  £B<qrU.  4 
theoL  Wiss.  Mentz.  1881  [J.  A,  MoehUr,  SymboUsm,  or  Ezpoa.  of  the  Dod  I>Ufereiioea  betwatf 
Protestants  and  Catbolios.  Lond.  8vo.] 

r)  Pftge  66.  A  111.    SymboUk.  Mayenoe.  1882.  ed.  4  1886.    Tflh.  QoartalMh.  188&  H.  1 


CHAP.  YL    CATH.  CHURCH  TILL  188a    )  478.  IDEAL  SCHOOL.  655 

denoy  was  represented  by  Moehler  (1796-1888),  who  had  been  aroused  by 
Schleiermacher,  and  at  one  time  had  been  pervaded  by  enthnsiasm  in  behalf 
of  ft'ee  investigation,  bnt  gradually  he  had  been  mastered  by  the  majesty  of 
his  Ohorch,  and  now  infused  a  confiding  spirit  once  more  into  the  department 
of  Boienoe.  In  France,  since  Lamennais  has  retired  from  the  public  scene, 
its  principal  representative  has  been  Bautain^  who  learned  to  distrust  his 
reason  in  the  school  of  Kant,  until  he  was  prepared  to  surrender  himself  to 
the  direction  of  the  Scriptures  and  of  ecclesiastical  tradition,  the  infinite 
nature  of  whose  principles  was  unfolded  and  evinced  by  their  power  in  the 
human  heart.  In  opposition  to  him,  the  Bishop  of  Strasburg  defended  simply 
scholastic  reason  (since  1884).  («)  Gunther  wished  to  substitute  for  the  hea- 
thenish philosophy  of  the  scholastics  and  the  ecclesiastical  fathers,  a  Chris- 
tian philosophy,  whose  mystical  and  profound  spirit  would  play  about  its 
rational  nature  in  the  manner  of  Jacob  Boehme,  like  an  aurora  borealis  or 
an  ignis  fatuus,  and  might  be  regarded  as  the  equal  sister  of  the  system  of 
fiiith  found  in  those  established  doctrines  of  the  Church  which  always  ap- 
proach nearest  to  the  truth.  But  this  "  Romish  Court  Philosophy"  of  Treves 
was  forbidden  by  an  order  from  Rome  (1852),  and  was  threatened  by  German 
denunciations  from  the  same  quarter.  (Q  The  same  disposition  and  views 
which  originated  and  sustained  an  old  orthodoxy  in  the  Protestant  Church, 
were  here  also  favorable  to  the  Roman  Jesuitic  Catholicism ;  and  now  when 
the  hierarchy,  with  its  extensive  possessions,  had  lost  also  its  splendid  posi- 
tion, it  received,  instead  of  the  distinguished  worldly  prelates  it  formerly  pos- 
sessed, and  who  often  opposed  the  pope,  were  very  independent,  and  were 
restrained  only  by  their  political  position,  a  class  of  bishops  whose  personal 
characters  were  eminent,  who  were  entirely  dependent  upon  Rome,  and  who 
used  the  unbroken  power  of  the  episcopacy  to  educate  a  clergy  of  a  similar 
spirit  The  literary  conflicts  of  these  three  parties  were  especially  exhibited 
in  the  German  periodicals,  (t/)  since  in  countries  where  every  Church  was 
protected  by  law,  the  privileges  of  the  Catholic  Church  were  sufficiently 
npheld  by  a  censorship  of  the  press  and  deposition  from  office.  Rome  did 
not  prove  itself  the  seat  of  any  very  extraordinary  theological  learning,  and 
wherever  it  allowed  itself  to  be  drawn  into  literary  controversy,  it  interfered 
by  means  of  rather  rough  weapons,  (r)  Still  even  the  pope  prohibited  only 
the  reading  of  certain  books,  and  exhorted  all  to  collect  their  energies  against 

«)  Biitdain :  de  l*enBelgnement  de  Ia  phll.  en  France.  Stnsb.  188S.  Phil  du  ChristUnlsme.  8tr. 
183S._AcU  hist  eoe.  1885.  p.  SOSss.  1887.  p.  68ml  C  F,  Mnge,  L.  Brat  (Zeitachr.  I  hist  Th  1887. 
▼oL  YIL  pi  S.)  BrL  KZ.  134S.  N.  8& 

I)  A.  G&ntfter :  Vonchule  z.  speo.  Tb.  Tien.  (18288.)  1848.  2  toIs.  Der  letzte  Symboliker.  Vlen. 
1884.  and  Pttbtt;  Janiiskopfe.  Vlen.  1884.  and  Veitk,  Phil.  Taschenb.  Yien.  1849s.— OiacA'n^tfr,  d. 
ebr.  PhiL  vertheldigt  Munich.  1858.  F.  J.  CUtnena,  d.  spec  Th.  Oanthem  Colog.  1S&8.  BrL  KZ. 
1852.  N.  6t 

it)  1.  Klrcbenfrennd  by  Benkert,  Athana^ia,  d.  Kathollk  bj  Well  kath.  Lit  Z.  by  Kerz,  Lazemer 
EZ.,  6ion,  hist  poL  Slitter,  by  Phlllpps,  J.  G<  ^re^  J.  E.  J<3r^  deatsche  (Kulner)  Volkshalle.  S. 
FnAm.  Blatter  Q.  TheoL  o.  Klrcbenth.,  by  Pflanz,  kan.  Wichter  by  A.  M  Oiler,  constlt  K.  Z.  by 
Leratranm&Uer,  Stlmmen  a.  d.  kath.  K  DentschL  8.  T&b.  tbeol.  Quartalsehrlft,  Zeltach.  t  d.  Erxb. 
Fralborg,  K.  Z.  by  Sengler,  Jahrbb.  t  Tbeol.  a.  PhlL 

v)  Braun,  d.  Lehren  d.  Hermeslanlsmns  gutgehelssen  u.  die  ent|regensteh.  Anslehten  Terworibii 
T.  d.  Blschof  T.  Straasb.  nebst  e^  Breve  Orvg.  XVL  Bonn.  188B.  F.  BaatUr^  (L  d.  Emandp.  d. 
KnlboUc.  T.  d.  rOm.  Dietatnr.  NOmb.  1889. 


656  MODESN  CHUBCH  HISTORY.    FEB.  YL    A.  D.  164&-185& 

those  who  for  selfish  ends,  but  under  the  pretence  of  reform,  had  conspired 
against  ecclesiastical  and  divine  rights,  (w)  A  few  were  wise  enough  to  be- 
come reconciled  in  a  proper  manner ;  others  did  not  return  until  they  were 
obliged  to  do  so  OS  penitent  forlorn  children,  and  still  others  fell  out  entirely 
with  the  Church,  (x)  The  Great  Union  of  127  Catholics  at  Dresden  (1831) 
declared  that  the  gospel,  explmned  by  the  light  of  reason  and  of  the  age, 
was  the  only  rule  of  tlieir  faith,  and  among  their  festivals  they  reckoned  one 
for  the  Sun,  but  none  for  the  resurrection  of  Christ.  On  the  other  hand, 
Caroxi  insisted  upon  the  literal  acceptance  of  the  ordinary  doctrines,  drove 
Catholicism  back  to  its  principle  of  an  infallibility  by  which  alone  men  oould 
be  saved,  and  then  tormented  himself  and  others  by  practical  difficulties  in 
the  way  of  it.  {y)  The  Abbe  IleUen  of  Brussels,  in  the  spirit  of  the  Cath- 
olic apostolic  Church,  exhorted  men  to  turn  from  the  Roman  Antichrist  to 
Christ,  but  it  was  not  long  before  he  died,  abandoned  by  all,  and  with  no 
confidence  even  in  himself  (1842).  {z) 

§  479.     German  Catholicism, 

Ednin  Batier,  Gesch.  d.  dout5ch-kath.  K.  MeU«.  1345l  W.  A.  Lampadius^  d.  deotscb^kAth.  Be* 
weg.  Lps.  1$46.— Kath.  KBcfonn,  Monatacbr.  cd.  by  A.  Maur.  JfUlUr,  BrL  a.  1S45.  FOr  ftvies  nl 
Lebon.  Materialien  x.  Gescb.  u.  Fortbild.  d.  chr.  Gemelndcn  Insb.  d.  freien  kath.  ed.  hy  T.  Jlt^rldk- 
Ur  and  F.  Kmnpe,  Bral.  a.  l&iS.  Literary  Gen.  View :  by  Ilase  and  Schwarx :  Jen.  A.  L.  2L  iStft.  M. 
181. 1S8.  221.  23S.  209i».  1847.  N.  68$a.  1S4S.  N.  187i«.  [Saml  Laing,  Not«s  on  tbe  BIm,  Ac  of  Ui« 
Germ.  Oath.  Chh.  Lond.  1S45.  Cercinu*,  Mission  of  the  Ger.  Catholics,  trana).  from  Germ.  LoixL 
1S4S.    Dabl.  Univ.  Mag.  (in  Eclectic  Mag.  Jan.  184A.)  OcL  1846.  art  on  Oenn.  Cath.  Chh.] 

The  Prussian  ecclesiastical  controversy  was  finally  celebrated  in  the 
Cathedral  of  Treves  (Aug.,  Oct.,  1844),  by  the  festival  of  the  seamless  coat 
of  Christ  (§  200).  More  than  a  million  of  people  went  thither  to  adore  this 
garment  of  our  divine  Lord ;  and  when  the  grand  niece  of  the  Archbishop 
of  Cologne  had  experienced  a  partial  cure  there,  thousands  made  trial  of  its 
miraculous  power,  with  a  few  instances  of  apparent  success,  (a)  The  rejoic- 
ings occasioned  by  this  pilgrimage  (b)  were  in  some  degree  disturbed  by  a  letter 
from  Laurahatte  against  the  idolatrous  festival  at  Treves,  and  addressed  to 
the  resident  bishop  as  the  Tetzel  of  the  nineteenth  century,  {c)  The  Tigoroos 
and  bold  tone,  and  the  signature  of  a  Catholic  priest  which  this  letter  exhib- 
ited, made  it  a  standard  at  which  both  friends  and  enemies  directed  their 
attention.  The  writer  of  it  was  John  Eonge  (b.  1818),  a  chaplain  who  had 
been  suspended  for  disobedience,  and  excommunicated  by  the  episcopal  aa- 


ir)  Gegen  Offenburg  y.  4.  Oct  1838:  A.  KZ.  1884.  N.  174. 

0-)  Chr.  Fucbs:  Schweiz  Bepablikaner,  1884.  N.  78.  (comp.  Alois  Fncba  fL  a.  SaapenalonigcMb. 
m.  ActenstQcken.  Bappers^v*.  1833.)  Aug.  Thein$r^  Gesch.  d.  geistL  Bildungaanatalten.  MayMoa. 
ISCd.  A.  KZ.  1885.  N.  238.  C  A  r.  Heichlin-Meldegg  :  A.  KZ.  1882.  N.  59.  Fischsr  :  BrL  KJL 
1841.  N.  15. 

y)  Die  gros50  Elnh.  d.  127  antirum.  Kath.  LpR.  1881.  A.  KZ.  1882.  N.  G.  JI  IT  Caro^  d. 
albinaeL  K.  Frk£  1826.  Die  letzten  Dinge  d.  rum.  Kath.  Lpa.  1882.  Bom.  Eatbolla  in  d.  PapiMadL 
Lps.  1851. 

«)  Ev.  KZ.  1888.  N.  101.    Brl.  KZ.  184a  N.  11. 

a)  J.  Marx,  d.  AoaatelL  d.  h.  Bocka.  Treves.  1845.  [John  Bonge,  or  tbe  II0I7  Coat  <rf  Trtreik 
New  York.  1845.  18.]  V.  JIanaerk,  actenmasa.  Darst  wanderb.  neilongeii  b.  Aoaat.  d.  b.  Boek& 
Trevea.  1845. 

b)  J.  V.  Gdrrt9,  d.  WalUl  ▼.  Trier.  Begenab.  1845. 

c)  At  first  in  tbe  Sichalacbe  Yaterlands  BliUer,  of  Get  16, 1844 


CHAP.  TL    CATH.  CHURCH  TILL  ISSa.    (  479.  GERMAN  CATHOLICISM.       657 

thoritie.<«  at  Breslau.  After  tbcee  proceedings  against  him,  he  had  published 
at  Brealau  some  polemical  writings  against  Romish  abominations,  and  in  favor 
of  the  establishment  of  a  German  national  Church.  His  style  was  rather 
declamatory,  but  his  sentiments  had  all  the  pathos  of  a  decided  convic- 
tion, (d)  In  SchneidemQhl,  a  town  belonging  to  Prut^sian  Poland,  the  vicar 
John  Czentki  (b.  1818)  had  been  suspended  because  he  would  not  renounce 
a  young  Polish  lady  to  whom  he  was  attached.  He  however  now  gave 
notice  (Aug.  22,  1844)  that  he  would  hold  no  further  connection  with  the 
Roman  court  Church ;  and  without  renouncing  his  Catholic  priesthood,  he 
proceeded,  with  some  members  of  his  congregation  who  believed  as  he  did, 
to  establish  what  he  called  a  Christian  apostolic  Catholic  congregation,  (e) 
On  the  plan  of  this  congregation,  many  Catholics  dissatisfied  with  their 
Church  collected  around  Ronge  at  Breslau,  as  Christian  Catholic  congrega- 
tions (March  9,  1845).  (/)  Persons  of  similar  sentiments  in  nearly  twenty 
of  the  towns  of  Northern  Germany  presented  addresses  of  concurrence  to 
Ronge,  and  united  together  as  German  Catholic  congregations.  They  were 
agreed  in  their  opposition  to  the  Roman  Church,  against  which  the  Reforma- 
tion had  protested  from  the  very  first,  so  fur  as  to  demand  a  free  use  of  the 
Scriptures  and  an  administration  of  the  affairs  of  the  Church  by  the  congre- 
gation. But  those  congregations  which  were  established  by  Czerski  firmly 
adhered  not  only  to  the  fundamental  principles  of  old  ecclesiastical  ortho- 
doxy, but  to  some  institutions  peculiarly  Romish  in  their  origin,  while  those 
which  proceeded  from  Breslau  were  of  a  rationalist  tendency.  To  give  unity 
to  this  Church,  without  much  previous  concert,  a  council  was  held  at  Leip- 
sic  on  Easter,  1845,  at  which  deputies  appeared  from  fifteen  congregations, 
and  provided  especially  for  the  liturgy  to  be  used,  and  the  general  order  of 
the  societies.  The  papal  hierarchy  was  unconditionally  renounced,  and  the 
Holy  Scriptures  were  recognized  as  the  foundation  of  a  faith  which  must  be 
modified  by  the  spirit  of  each  successive  age,  and  explained  and  compre- 
hended by  a  reason  pervaded  by  the  general  Christian  idea.  Nothing  was 
retained  of  the  second  article  of  the  modernized  Apostles'  Creed  except  a 
declaration  of  faith  in  Jesus  Christ  as  our  Saviour,  and  a  special  stress  was 
laid  upon  works  of  love  as  the  true  evidence  of  faith,  {g)  Czerski  consented 
to  this  triumph  of  the  Breslau  party,  as  the  particulars  of  the  creed  were 
left  to  the  free  choice  of  each  congregation ;  but  at  home  he  adopted  a  con- 
fession  which  embraced  the  doctrine  of  the  divinity  of  Christ  and  the  Apos- 
tles' Creed,  and  renounced  the  companions  of  the  Leipsio  confession  as  the 
worshippers  of  reason  and  the  enemies  of  Christ,  (/t)  During  two  tours 
which  Ronge  took  as  far  as  the  borders  of  Switzerland,  he  founded  many 
congregations.    A  few  attacks  were  then  made  upon  him,  but  generally  he 


d)  An  (1.  nledcre  kath.  Oeistliclik.  Jena.  1840.    An  d.  kath.  Lehrer.  Alt«nb.  1S45.    Rocht&rttg. 
Lpa.  1SI5.    An  meine  Olanbeni^nosaon  n.  Mltb&rgor.  Altcnb.  1S4fi. 

e)  Kechtfert  melnos  Abfalles  t.  d  rum.  Hof  kirche.  Bromb.  184Sl    Offlsnes  Olaabenabek.  d.  cbr.  ap. 
kath.  K.  za  Schncldem.  Danz.  1S45. 

/)  Die  clirlstkatb.  Gemeinde  za  Brcolan.  BresL  8  ed.  184&. 

g)  Die  entte  allg.  KVenamml.  d.  deutacb-kath.  K.  za  Lelpaie,  ed.  bj  R.  Blum  and  F.  Wigard^ 
Lpa.  184S.    [A  day  with  Bongo.  DabL  Unir.  Mag.  (in  EcleoUc  Mag.  April  1844.)  Jan.  IS48:l 
A)  Caertki^  SendBchr.  an  alle  chr.  aposl  kath.  Oemeinden.  Landab.  184S. 

48 


658  MODERN  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  YL    A.  D.  1M8-188a 

was  complimented  along  his  journey  with  pnblic  dinners,  as  if  he  were  a 
second  Luther,  (i)  Gzerski,  whose  believing  tendencies  foand  acknowledge 
ment  only  in  a  much  more  limited  sphere,  and  even  there  came  sometimes 
unpleasantly  in  contact  with  some  of  Ronge^s  adherents,  (l)  was  induced,  at 
a  conference  assembled  at  Rawicz  (Feb.  8,  1846),  to  acknowledge  his  other 
fellow-combatants  as  brethren.  Tliis  he  did  notwithstanding  his  undeviating 
and  cordial  adherence  to  the  standard  of  the  unabridged  apostolic  Creed,  on 
the  ground  that  it  might  tend  to  confirm  religion  to  recognize  the  common 
basis  on  which  their  faith  rested,  and  with  the  hope  that  they  might  recog- 
nize each  other  again  as  brethren.  (/)  The  congregations  which  acted  on 
these  Yiews  at  a  synod  convened  at  SchneidemQhl  (July,  1846),  adopted  t 
simple  biblical  confession,  with  the  concession  that  the  old  Apostle'  Creed 
might  bo  used  in  the  churches  and  schools,  although  they  acknowledge  that 
it  contains  some  historical  matters  of  minor  importance  for  the  Christian 
heart,  (m)  In  England,  a  short  time  after  this,  Czerski  himself  avowed  that 
his  views  on  this  point  had  been  radically  changed,  (n)  but  the  only  congre- 
gation which  thoroughly  represents  his  theological  system,  is  one  which  has 
been  collected  at  Berlin  for  the  very  purpose  of  a  protest,  and  which  has  even 
gone  beyond  his  exclusive  position,  (o)  Ronge,  on  the  other  hand,  anxious 
to  ennoble  Christianity,  and  exalt  it  to  a  complete  religion  of  humanity,  has 
shown  himself  inclined  to  unite  with  the  free  Protestant  congregations 
(§  467).  (p)  The  proposal  for  such  a  union,  however,  was  quietly  laid  aside, 
when  it  was  made  in  the  two  ecclesiastical  assemblies  held  in  Berlin  at  Whit- 
suntide, 1847,  representing  a  hundred  and  fifty-one  congregations,  and 
thoroughly  adhering  to  the  Leipsic  resolutions,  (q)  German  Catholicism  has 
carried  out  its  forms  of  public  worship  and  its  constitution  in  smaller  synodal 
associations,  (r)  the  former  with  Protestant  simplicity,  and  tho  latter  with  a 
decided  stress  laid  upon  the  rights  of  particular  congregations,  not  only  with 
respect  to  their  own  pastors,  who  are  supported  by  voluntary  contributions, 
but  with  regard  to  the  powers  of  synods,  and  in  some  instances  the  women 
possessed  an  equal  right  with  others  to  vote.  A  few  clergymen  with  their 
adherents,  who  went  over  to  the  new  association,  were  excommunicated  by 
the  bishops  under  whose  jurisdiction  they  had  lived,  but  generally  the  con- 
troversy was  merely  of  a  literary,  though  sometimes  of  a  disgraceful  charac- 
ter. (j»)  Ronge  has  proposed  himself  as  a  reformer  even  to  the  Protestant 
Church,  where  the  chief  point  of  his  reformation  consists  in  bringing  Christ 
down  to  the  brotherhood  of  human  poverty  and  suffering.  (/)    A  few  licen- 

0  RonsA's  ei9to  Randreise.  Bnl.  1845.    (Schumann,)  Ron|»>*8  Fabrton.  Rndolst  1846w 

k)  J.  H.  F.  Romberg,  d.  Spalt  d.  christ-kaUi.  Yerefns  zn  Bmmberg.  BrombL  ISIS. 

t)  CcerfiH,  zweltos  Bendschr.  an  alio  christ-kath.  OemelDden.  Bromb.  1840. 

m)  BrI.  KZ.  1846.  N.  6a  68. 

n)  Kath.  KRofurm.  Nov.  1846.  p.  141.   £r.  KZ.  1847.  N.  8Si. 

o)  Q1anb«n»bek.  der  nach  d.  Protest  v.  15.  Mai  za  Berlin  slob  bildenden  christkath.  Gen 
BrL  1845. 

P)  Brl.  KZ.  1847.  N.  8. 11. 15. 

q)  I)ii>  zweite  chriBtkath.  KYeraamml.  za  Berlin,  ed.  by  R.  Blum  and  K  Wiffardy,  Lpa.  1SI7. 

r)  GnindKugo  d.  OlaubensL,  d.  Oottefld.  u.  d.  YerC  genehm.  t.  d.  Syn.  in  Bredao.  BnL  18fi 
Organ.  Statut  f.  deutKb-kaUi.  Oem.  ▼.  F.  Wigard.  Dread.  1845i. 

«)  Offenea  Sendachr.  der  Wltwe  Anna  Cierska  an  Ihren  Sobn,  den  raq>end.  Prieator.  RaUib.  180 

0  Range,  Neae  a  doch  alte  Folnde.  Deaa.  1&45l    D.  Weaen  d.  ftelen  chr.  K.  Hamb.  1847. 


CHAP.  YL    CATU.  CHUBCH  TILL  1898.    )  479.  OEBMAN  CATHOLICISM.       659 

tiates  found  an  earlier  field  of  labor  in  German  Catholic  congregations,  and 
two  Protestant  congregations  in  the  country  found  it  convenient  to  connect 
themselves  with  the  German  Catholics  on  account  of  difficulties  in  their  local 
circumstances.    But  the  Protestant  population  has  almost  unanimously  offered 
the  new  Church  the  joint  use  of  their  own  churches,  a  considerable  assistance 
in  money,  and  the  power  of  their  daily  press,  with  no  wish  to  draw  away  its 
members,  and  at  first  with  great  expectations  of  national  results,  (e/)    So  far 
as  their  relations  to  the  state  were  concerned,  the  German  Catholics  claimed 
all  the  privileges  which  had  been  conceded  to  the  Catholics,  without  modifi- 
cation.   By  prohibitions  and  expatriations,  the  governments  of  Austria  and 
Bavaria  nearly  succeeded  in  entirely  excluding  the  sect  of  Ronge  from  their 
territories.    The  smaller  Protestant  states  allowed  the  Catholic  dissenters  to 
proceed  without  molestation.    The  governments  of  Hanover,  Saxony,  Baden, 
and  Wurtemberg,  opposed  them ;  the  two  latter  impaired  their  rights  of  citi- 
zenship, and  in  Hesse  Cassel  they  were  oppressed  with  still  greater  severity. 
In  every  country,  however,  their  rights  were  sustained  by  the  lower  legisla- 
tive chamber,  (r)    At  first,  Prussia  declared  that  it  would  not  then  interfere 
in  their  favor,  or  in  opposition  to  them ;  afterwards,  the  displeasure  which 
it  felt  at  the  peculiar  Christianity  of  the  age  was  stronger  than  its  pleasure 
in  seeing  the  injury  to  the  hierarchy,  until  finally  the  natural  current  of 
affairs  brought  it  around  once  more  to  the  policy  of  non-interference,  (to) 
German  Catholicism  has  prevailed  almost  exclusively  among  the  middle 
classes  of  society,  but  the  learned  Regenhreeht^  a  professor  of  canon  law  at 
Breslao,  gave  in  his  adheaon  to  it  when  the  congregation  was  formed  in  that 
city,  and  Theiner^  at  the  frequent  solicitation  of  different  parties,  contributed 
his  established  reputation  to  the  new  movement,  {x)    Both  these  men,  how- 
ever, have  since  been  estranged  and  separated  from  all  connection  with  any 
congregation,  principally  in  consequence  of  the  course  which  Ronge  has  pur- 
suecL  (y)    Near  the  end  of  the  year  1846,  it  became  evident  that  the  leaders 
in  this  movement  were  beginning  to  sink  in  public  estimation,  and  that  their 
cause  was  deficient  in  religious  energy.    It  could  not  therefore  be  concealed 
that  the  movement  itself  had  come  to  a  dangerous  pause.    The  new  Church 
then  numbered  about  CO, 000  members,  nearly  half  of  whom  were  in  Silesia. 
Where  the  Catholic  population  was  compact  and  unbroken,  scarcely  any 
inroad  was  made  upon  it ;  but  the  remnants  and  advanced  posts  of  the  Cath- 
olic Church  in  Protestant  countries,  which  had  been  gained  or  maintained 
with  difficulty  for  centuries,  were  either  lost  or  much  endangered,  and  seri- 
ous apprehensions  were  entertained  at  Rome  that  another  Reformation  was 
about  to  proceed  from  Germany.    March,  1848,  brought  complete  freedom  to 


If)  Gerrintu :  d.  Mission  d.  D.  Kathollken.  H^th.  1845i  [G^rvinw^  MInton  of  the  Qnrm.  Catho- 
lics. Ix>nd.  1844.  12.]  (A  RcKenkel,  d.  proL  Geistlichk.  a.  d.  D.  KathoMken.  Z&r.  1846.)  D.  prot  Oeist- 
lictik.  n.  d.  DK&thoHken.  Heldelb.  1S46. 

r)  Di«  Sprecher  t  d.  DKatti.  in  d.  sfichs.  St'lndevers.  Lps.  1645. 2  P.  F.  Jlecker^  die  !>tut8ri>ehtL 
Verli.  d.  DKatboL  m.  be&  Hinblick.  a.  Baden.  Heldelb.  2  ed.  1840.  a  FHsdrioh,  Die  dentsebkath. 
Frage  in  Kurhessen.  Lpa.  1847. 

«e)  Cab.  Ordre  t.  80  Apr.,  Minist  Veril  t.  17.  Mai,  Cab.  Ordre  ▼.  8.  Jali,  184&  L.  RicMer,  d. 
Staat  u.  d.  DKatbollken.  Lpa  1S4«. 

m)  Erkl.  d.  Pro£  Refenbreeht  an  d.  Bisth.  Venreaer  iL  a.  Aoaaeheiden  a.  d.  rftm.  K.  Bral.  184BL 
^Jniom  rJMiur,  d.  nt  Beatrebongeo  in  d.  kath.  K.  BnL  1849a.  2  P.        y)  Bri.  KZ.  1847.  N.  1& 


660  MODERN  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  VL    A.  D.  IMfr-lSHL 

the  new  Ohurch :  in  Saxony  it  was  recognized  as  a  civil  corporation ;  (z)  the 
most  rigid  Catholic  countries  were  thrown  open  to  it ;  in  Vienna  and  Mnnich 
it  was  received  with  a  curious  interest ;  in  Austria  it  was  tolerated,  and  in 
Bavaria  it  was  recognized,  though  the  Archhishop  of  Frejsingen  would  not 
allow  German  Oatholicism  to  be  property  either  Catholic  or  German.    It  was, 
however,  soon  found  that  the  religious  element  within  and  beyond  the  con* 
gregations  became  less  and  less  prominent.    Ronge,  as  a  deputy  of  the  demo- 
cratic unions,  published  a  manifesto,  in  which  he  denounced  the  election  of 
an  irresponsible  imperial  officer  as  an  act  of  treason  to  the  people;  and 
Dowiat  perhaps  did  injustice  to  the  excitements  of  his  youthful  &ncy,  when 
he  declared  that  he  had  looked  upon  the  religious  movement  as  only  the 
means  of  a  social  agitation,  but  thnt  he  now  r^arded  such  a  mask  as  need- 
less.   The  authorities  of  the  Silesian  congregations  were  anxious  to  guard 
against  the  power  of  mere  brute  force,  but  they  wished  also  to  sanctify 
democracy,  and  make  socialism  a  religion,  (a)    Probably  no  complete  congre- 
gations, but  some  individual  preachers  who  had  some  Hegelian  views,  hoped 
to  find  on  the  ruins  of  the  Catholic  and  Protestant  churches  their  new  reli- 
gion of  humanity,  a  true  theocracy  in  democracy,  and  Grod  himself  in  the 
congregation,  (b)    The  German  Catholics,  and  those  attached  to  the  free  con- 
gregations, naturally  felt  a  sympathy  with  each  other,  and  had  therefore 
associated  together  to  a  considerable  extent,  (r)  before  the  proposition  for 
their  union  had  been  discussed  in  the  third  German  Catholic  ooondl,  and  a 
free-congregational  diet  at  Leipsic-Coethen  (May,  1850).      Some  hesitation 
was  felt  by  the  German  Catholics  on  account  of  the  freedom  from  all  forms 
which  characterized  the  free  congregations;    and  the  free  congregations 
were  not  altogether  pleased  with  the  want  of  freedom  which  prevailed  among 
the  German  Catholics,  but  they  were  finally  united  in  the  presence  of  the 
police  of  both  cities,  so  as  to  constitute  a  religious  association  of  free  congre- 
gations for  mutual  assistance  in  their  religious  efforts,  but  on  the  basis  of  a 
complete  independence  of  each  congregation.    These  were  to  have  an  execu- 
tive committee,  to  be  chosen  by  a  triennial  assembly  of  deputies,  but  to  have 
no  power  except  to  express  its  opinions,  and  to  make  proposals  to  the  congre- 
gations, (d)    Most  of  the  congregations  which  had  originated  in  the  Catholic 
Church  refused  to  agree  to  a  union  of  even  this  loose  character,  (e)    They 
could  not  therefore  escape  the  fate  of  the  free  congregations  (p.  584).    The 
peculiar  turn  which  events  took  in  Catholic  countriea  was  such  as  to  render 
this  result  inevitable.    In  Austria,  after  a  long  delay,  the  government  refhsed 
(Jan.,  1850)  to  recognize  the  Free  Christian  congregation  at  Vienna,  on  the 
ground  that  the  negative  character  of  its  confession  gave  no  sstisfactory  evi- 
dence that  it  was  called  for  merely  by  the  religious  wants  of  the  people.  CO 
When  all  women  and  minors  had  been  excluded  from  the  German-Catholic 

•)  Law  of  Not.  2, 1848 :  BrL  KZ.  1S4S.  N.  M, 

a)  Of  SepL  15^  1849:  in  Kampe,  (nt  h.)  ^  816as. 

h)  F.  F.  Kampe,  d.  WeMD  d.  DK&th.  m.  bes.  BQoks.  a.  8.  Terfa.  s.  Polltik.  Tfkt.  185a 

c)  A.  D.  Z.  1847.  N.  811. 

d)  Th.  Eqfferichier^  d.  Union  d.  f^len  Oemelnden  d.  K&th.  a.  Prot  Lpc  ISSa  Bri.  KZ.  1890. 
N.4e.48. 

e)  Ibid.  I860.  N.  88.  8S.  18U.  N.  16w        /)  Ibid.  18B0l  N.  M.  40.  1851  N.  6i  1061 


CHAP.  YL    CATIL  OQUBCH  TILL  1858.    |480.  8AILEB.  EMSiERICU.  661 

eongregations  of  Bavaria,  they  were  dissolved  as  political  associations  (Nov., 
1851).  (g)  But  even  in  Protestant  countries,  the  dread  of  the  evils  of  reli- 
gious liberty,  or  a  desire  to  please  the  hierarchy,  generally  led  to  their  sup- 
pression. In  Prussia,  where  the  constitution  rendered  any  measure  to  pro- 
duce their  general  abolition  impossible,  individual  congregations  were  dis- 
persed, and  their  preachers  were  expelled  from  the  country  by  the  police, 
and  contributions  from  the  common  fund,  even  where  they  had  been  granted 
for  a  series  of  previous  years,  were  withheld,  because  the  government  pro- 
fessed to  have  discovered  that  they  were  political  rather  than  religious  asso- 
ciations, aiming  at  the  subversion  of  civil  and  social  order.  (A)  In  Hamburg, 
the  concession  which  had  once  been  made  them,  was  revoked  on  account  uf 
their  departure  from  the  confession  of  faith  adopted  at  Leipsic.  (i)  Internal 
dissensions,  the  return  of  their  ministers  to  former  connections,  and  a  want 
of  worldly  means,  or  a  want  of  liberality  in  the  use  of  what  they  possessed, 
have  hastened  their  gradual  decline. 

§  480.     Mystics  and  Wonder'  Workers, 

A.  circle  of  young  persons  was  at  one  time  assembled  around  Bishop 
Sailer  (1761-1882),  whose  Christianity  was  confined  to  the  simple  doctrine 
of  salvation,  and  whose  religion  consisted  wholly  of  certain  fervent  exercises 
of  feeling.  They  therefore  had  no  very  high  regard  for  ecclesiastical  forms ; 
they  earnestly  commended  the  works  of  Fenelon  and  Lavater,  and  were 
much  attached  to  the  Pietists  of  Wurtemberg.  As  they  were  persecuted  by 
the  Romanist,  and  despised  by  the  Liberal  party,  some  of  them  became  dis- 
satisfied with  the  Church  itself  (1796ss.)  When  Poeschl^  a  pastor  settled  near 
Linz,  was  compelled  to  leave  his  congregation,  every  other  minister  was 
rejected  by  the  people,  and  on  Good  Friday,  1817,  a  young  girl  was  actually 
killed,  that  she  might  thereby  follow  the  example  of  Christ,  in  dying  for  her 
brethren  and  sisters.  Sailer  humbled  himself  before  the  hierarchy,  and 
renounced  mysticism,  but  even  as  a  bishop  he  never  ceased  to  make  efforts  to 
extend  the  kingdom  of  love,  (a)  The  wonderful  prodigies  in  which  some 
believed  were  the  result  either  of  harmless  and  sickly  excitements,  or  of  a 
settled  purpose.  Emmerich  (1774-1824),  a  sister  belonging  to  the  Convent 
of  Agnetenberg,  within  which  all  her  desires  were  bounded,  gave  herself 
completely  up  to  the  contemplation  of  the  sufferings  of  Jesus,  from  whose 
hands  she  had  selected  the  crown  of  thorns  which  she  bore  upon  her  body. 
Just  as  St.  Francis  had  borne  the  five  wounds  of  our  Lord ;  and  frequently, 
when  those  days  recurred  on  which  Christ^s  passion  was  celebrated,  the 
wound  was  opened.  (6)  That  which  appears  to  have  been  effected  here  by 
an  active  and  plastic  imagination,  in  other  instances  was  evidently  the  result 
of  deception,  with  or  without  the  knowledge  of  the  subjects  of  them,  (c) 

g)  BrL  KZ.  1851.  N.  99.         A)  Ibid.  N.  14  88.  1852.  N.  14 
0  Ibid.  1858.  N.  17. 

a)  J.  M.  SaOer,  Biimtl.  Werke.  Snlzb.  1880-85.  28  vola.  JSalat^  CL  Mjit  m.  hist  AafkhlQMen  0. 
Hyst  in  Baiern.  Sulzb.  1822.    Cumpi  {  474  nt  ff. 

b)  (d  «.  SrtfUano^)  Das  blUre  Leiden  unaen  Heim.  Nach  den  Betrr.  d.  mL  A.  C  Emm.  nebst 
d.  Lebenaumatioden  dieser  Begnadlgten.  Snlzb.  1888. 6  ed.  1842.  Tholuck^  verm.  Schrr.  roL  I.  p.  1  llaa 
voL  II.  p.  477a.— Yolkaheilige  za  Kaltern :  A.  KZ.  1888w  N.  175.  BrL  KZ.  184a  N.  99. 

e)  BrL  KH  1849.  N.  7a  184a  N.  68.  87. 


662  MODERN  OUUBCH  HISTOKT.    PER.  TL    A.  D.  16I8-19(ML 

The  miracQloas  cores  accomplished  by  Prince  Hohenlohe  (about  1820,  d. 
1849),  then  a  canon  at  Bamberg,  were,  it  is  true,  much  extolled  among  the 
common  people,  but  they  had  too  little  importance  and  character  to  make 
much  way  against  the  police  and  the  prosaic  spirit  of  the  present  age.  In 
Rome,  the  conversion  of  a  wealthy  Jew  was  effected  by  an  appearance  of 
the  Virgin  Mary  (1842).  {d)  She  also  made  her  appearance  in  other  places. 
In  Rimini,  thousands  of  pilgrims  were  convinced,  to  their  great  edifioatloD, 
that  the  Mother  of  mercy  moved  the  eyes  of  her  image  there  np  and  down, 
and  even  some  partisans  of  Mazzini  were  converted  from  their  errors  by  the 
sight.  («) 

§  481.     Orders. 

Napoleon  remarked,  that  the  holy  zeal  of  the  Sisters  of  Charity  led  them 
to  bestow  a  much  better  and  clieaper  attendance  upon  the  hospitals,  than  the 
rewards  which  he  could  offer  to  mercenaries.  He  therefore  collected  their 
scattered  numbers  into  a  general  chapter,  over  which  the  mother  of  the  em- 
peror presided  (1807),  provided  them  with  a  rule,  and  supplied  them  with  aH 
needed  assistance.  The  predilection  which  the  pious  sisters  exhibited  for  the 
conversioi)  of  Protestant  patients,  prevented  their  introduction  in  some 
instances  into  tlie  German  hospitals,  (a)  But  more  especially  in  France, 
where  a  convent  for  nuns  had  become  an  habitual  want,  they  were  renewed 
in  various  forms,  (b)  When  the  last  monk  of  St.  Manrus  died  a  member  of 
the  Institute  of  France,  a  few  friends  of  Lamennais,  under  the  protection  of 
the  Bishop  of  Mons,  purchased  the  old  abbey  of  Soleme  (1838),  that  they  might 
revive  within  its  tranquil  seclusion  the  devout  learning  of  the  congregation 
of  St.  Maurus.  {c)  A  congregation  was  established  at  Rome  for  the  purpose 
of  rescuing  the  orders  which  had  been  despoiled  of  their  property,  and  in 
some  of  the  concordats  a  number  of  convents  were  promised ;  but  the  pious 
wishes  of  the  several  governments  were  generally  thwarted,  when  an  attempt 
was  made  to  restore  the  property  which  belonged  to  them.  In  Biavaria  alone 
more  was  accomplished  than  had  been  promised  in  the  concordat,  (d)  The 
various  orders  of  knights  had  for  a  long  time  entirely  lost  all  importance 
with  respect  to  the  Church.  The  KnighU  of  St.  John  ceased  to  possess  any 
power  when  Malta  passed  from  their  hands  (1798),  and  in  the  treaty  of  Paris 
(1814)  was  recognized  2&  a  fortress  for  the  protection  of  Enghsh  com- 
merce, (e)  The  German  Musters  (Teutonic  Knights)  also  lost  all  their  politi- 
cal importance  in  consequence  of  the  loss  of  Mergentheim  at  the  peace  of 
Vienna  (1810) ;  and  although  their  application  for  its  re-establishment  was 
seconded  by  the  general  voice  of  all  Europe,  their  appeal  to  the  EnropeaD 

<f)  Bri.  KZ.  1342.  N.  67.  1848.  N.  46.       e)  Brl.  KZ.  18D0.  N.  4a  Glss.  60a. 

a)  {C,  V.  Brentano,)  Die  bannh.  Schw.  CobL  1881.  Sheinw.  Sep.  tuL  XYIIL  pi  S86aft.  C.  Btm, 
d.  O.  d.  barroh.  Schw.  Schaffh.  2  ed.  1847. 

b)  Reuchlin,  Chiistenth.  in  Frankr.  p.  22688. 

c)  A.  KZ.  1883.  N.  14d.  AcU  bbt  eoc  1S87.  p.  6.  SpicUegtom  SoIesmeDS^  enr.  J.  R  PUra, 
Par.  1852.  vol.  I. 

d)  AcU  hist  ecc  1887.  p.  854.  Brl.  KZ.  1846.  N.  10. 

e)  Vic.  de  ViUeneuve-Bargemont^  MoDaroens  des  Orands-Maltres  de  Tordr*  d*  &  Jc«d.  Par. 
1829.  2  V0I5.  [L,  d€  Boisgelin,  Anc.  and  Mod.  Malta,  and  H.  of  tb«  Knlgbts  of  St  John.  Lond.  IVA 
8  vols.  4] 


CHAP.YL    OATH.  OHUBCH  TILL  1808.    S4SL  OBDEfiS.    $  483.  If ISSIONS.     663 

OongKfis  for  the  restoratioii  of  their  poflsessions  was  disregarded.  (/)  These 
orders  are  now  kept  up,  and  in  some  places  are  re-established,  especially  in 
Austria  and  Italy,  merely  for  the  decorations  and  pensions  which  the  nobility 
derive  from  them,  (ff)  Such  Knights  of  St.  John  are  to  be  found  since  1812 
in  Prussia,  but  no  longer  as  a  Catholic  institution.  They  have  been  obliged 
to  return  (1852)  to  the  care  of  the  sick,  in  accordance  with  the  original  de- 
sign of  the  order,  but  they  are  allowed  to  do  this  by  the  payment  of  money 
for  that  object,  (h)  An  order  of  Templars  attracted  some  notice  in  Paris 
since  the  commencement  of  the  eighteenth  century,  as  a  secret  lodge,  but 
since  1831  it  has  publicly  claimed  to  be  the  original  Christian  Cliurch.  (t) 
According  to  them,  an  original  revelation  was  conveyed  and  cultivated  in 
the  Greek  and  Egyptian  mysteries,  from  which  it  was  derived  by  Moses,  was 
renewed  and  re-established  by  Jesus,  and  was  transmitted  to  John  as  the  head 
of  the  Church,  and  to  his  successors,  among  whom  are  the  Grand  Masters  of 
the  Temple.  This  revelation  was  a  religion  of  reason,  and  proclaimed  that 
God  consisted  of  three  Powers,  viz..  Existence,  Act,  and  Consciousness,  and 
that  the  world  was  distinct  from  Grod,  but  uncreated  and  divine.  A  gospel 
of  St.  John  accommodated  to  this  view  is  in  the  possession  of  the  order, 
which  possibly  had  its  origin  in  the  fourteenth  century,  (k)  The  order,  how- 
ever, has  nothing  in  common  with  Catholicism  but  a  hierarchy  to  which  the 
most  imposing  titles  are  given.  It  knew  also  how  to  give  the  most  enlight- 
ened interpretation  of  the  vows  of  the  old  Templars,  (/)  and  announced  that 
it  would  St  some  future  period  overthrow  the  Roman  Church.  For  a  while 
the  Parisians  were  much  amused  by  the  splendid  costumes  which  the  male 
and  female  members  of  the  order  exhibited  in  their  processions. 

§  482.     Spread  of  Christianity. 

As  the  Catholic  nations  of  Europe  were  distracted  by  the  revolutions  of 
that  period,  they  lost  their  colonies,  and  were  obliged  to  curtail  but  not  en- 
tirely to  abandon  thair  missions.  When  the  Church  began  to  recover  its 
strength,  the  desire  to  promote  missions  to  the  heathen  revived.  The  Society 
of  the  Faith  at  Lyons,  which  became  more  influential  than  even  the  Propa- 
ganda, grew  up  from  a  very  humble  origin  (after  1820)  by  means  of  trifling 
weekly  contributions  from  a  small  circle  of  persons  who  read  the  Annals  of 
the  Propagation  of  the  Faith,  until  the  annual  income  it  expended  for  mis- 
sions amounted  to  millions,  (a)  The  first  object  of  the  missionaries  for  the 
establishment  of  the  external  Church  continued  to  be  the  baptism  of  the 
heathen.     China  was  adhered  to  with  the  utmost  tenacity,  even  when  all 

/)  A.  KZ.  1822.  N.  6fi.         g)  BrL  KZ.  IMa  N.  18. 

h)  Ibid.  1Sd&  N.  2.  a  D.  A.  Z.  18da  N.  180. 

i)  (Manuel  des  CheTallen  do  Tordre  du  Temple.  M.  &  Par.  1825. 12.)  Levitlcon.  Par.  1881.  £glifle 
ehret  primitlTe.  Lettre  pastorale  de  M.  Tevvqae  de  Naocy.  {L'/ldtc.)  Naacy.  1882. — Carov^,  d.  Mes- 
slanlsmns,  d.  nenen  Tcmplcr.  Lpe.  1884.    J.  P.,  Eechercbee  hist  rar  les  Teinpliers.  Par.  183Sl 

k)  BPtirUer^  Notitlacod.  graed  Er.  Jo.  variatnm  continentls.  Ilafn.  1S28.  ThUo^  cod.  apoer.  vol. 
Lp.  8198S. 

t)  BrL  KZ.  1S89.  N.  8a 

a)  The  receipts  for  1845  were  ^575,775  franca.  Annales  de  la  propagation  de  la  foL  lSS4u.  pnbl. 
also  in  tfao  Oerm.,  Engl,  Flemish,  ItaL,  Sfianlsh,  Portug.,  and  Dutch  hinguagea.  A.  KZ.  1S48.  N.  100. 
BwLKZ.1847.N.0a 


664  MODEBN  CHUBOH  UI8T0BT.    FEB.  TL    A.  D.  1MS-186& 

reason  for  hope  with  respect  to  it  seemed  extinct  Once  more  the  Chnrcfa 
began  to  enlarge  its  territories  there,  when  a  map  of  the  oonntrj,  which  the 
missionaries  intended  to  send  to  Rome,  was  intercepted.  This  produced  a 
renewal  of  the  persecution  (1806).  Bishop  Dufre»ne  was  beheaded  (1815). 
A  martyrdom  quite  anfavorable  to  enthusiasm  was  inflicted  by  means  of  the 
bamboo  and  the  gangue.  The  missionaries  were  subsequently  persecuted  or 
tolerated,  according  to  the  caprice  of  the  goyemment.  The  crime  puniriied 
was  not  so  much  a  profession  of  Christianity,  as  a  connection  with  foreigners. 
At  last,  however,  the  victories  of  the  English  gave  protection  even  to  the 
Oatholic  Church.  The  priests  are  generally  natives,  some  of  whom  are  edu- 
cated in  the  seminaries  of  tlie  country,  and  others  at  a  branch  of  the  Propa- 
ganda at  Naples.  About  one  in  two  thousand  of  the  population  of  Central 
China  have  been  baptized,  (h)  From  the  Ecutt  Indie$^  where  frequently  the 
oonversions  consisted  principally  of  mere  changes  back  and  forth  between 
the  Catholic  and  Protestant  missionaries,  the  candid  DuhoU  returned  to 
Europe  (1828)  with  the  conviction  that  life  was  uselessly  spent  in  labors  to 
convert  the  people,  and  that  there  was  no  ground  for  hope  that  the  gospel 
would  ever  overcome  the  prejudices  of  the  Hindoos,  {c)  The  King  of  Cochin 
China,  where  Christians,  under  the  French  Bishop  Adran  had  attained  con- 
siderable political  importance,  extolled  the  wisdom  of  the  Emperor  of  Japan, 
who  had  got  rid  of  the  European  doctrines,  and  accordingly,  in  particular 
instances,  he  oppressed  them  after  1881.  By  a  decree  of  Jan.  6, 1838,  a  gen- 
eral persecution,  modified  indeed  by  the  local  authoritiea,  raged '  especially 
agiunst  the  priests  until  1842.  The  memory  of  the  martyrs  in  this  persecu- 
tion was  celebrated  at  Rome  by  the  pope,  {d)  The  Abb6  Sehofjfler,  at  the 
head  of  a  mission  to  the  interior,  died  like  Cyprian  in  1851.  Under  the  free 
toleration  enjoyed  in  North  America,  the  Catholic  Church  has  acquired  con- 
siderable strength  principally  by  immigrations  from  Europe,  but  also  by  its 
judicious  management  of  its  internal  affairs,  (e)  The  Algonquim  and  Iro- 
quois made  (1881)  a  present  of  a  piece  of  wampum  and  some  moccasins  of 
their  own  work  to  the  holy  Father,  who  had  sent  to  his  children  of  the  wil- 
derness the  man  in  the  black  coat,  by  whom  they  had  been  instructed  and 
induced  to  acknowledge  the  unknown  God,  and  to  live  in  peao^  with  one 
another.  (/)  A  French  diocese  has  been  formed  (1888)  in  Algiers,  and  an 
arm  of  St.  Augustine  was  solemnly  brought  back  to  Hippo  (1842).  (^)  In 
the  islands  of  the  South  Sea,  a  missionary  bishop  has  attempted  to  gather 
the  harvest  where  others  had  sown  the  seed  (§  478). — ^The  Catholic  Church 
numbers  about  a  hundred  and  fifty  millions  of  adherents,  organised  into 
seven  hundred  and  sixty-three  bishoprics.  (A) 

h)  Geecb.  d.  kath.  Mias.  In  ChlnA.  Tien.  184068.  Bhelnw.  Bep.  yoL  XXYIIL  p.  SSlss.  XXX. 
188W.  D.  A.  Z.  1S45.  N.  8M. 

e)  IhtboU,  Letters  on  the  State  of  Christ  in  India.  Lond.  189&  U.  t.  Hoffknaan,  Keost  1S34 
Comp.  KHlst  Archiv.  18^  P.  &  [Dubois  was  answered  by  Hoogh,  Townley,  and  others.  Stt 
p.  472,  nt  a.] 

d)  A.Z.  1835.  Snppl.  N.  108.  lS4a  N.  148.  BrL  KZ.  1889.  N.  78.  A.  KZ.  ISiO.  N.  M.  208L 

e)  Vogt,  d.  katli.  K.  in  d.  Verein.  Staaten.  (Tab.  Qnartalschr.  1841.  P.  1.) 

/)  A.  KZ.  1882.  N.  ea 

Q)  Bhelnw.  Rep.  vol  XXIII.  p.  78b.   A.  KZ  1889.  N.  68. 184S.  N.  2. 

A)  CharU«o/SL  Aloyn,  d.  kath.  K.  in  Ihrer  gegenw.  Ansbr.  a.  d.  Erde.  Battsb.  1845k  GiflU 
Petri,  Oerarchia  della  p.  Chlcsa  catt.  apost  Komana.  Lps.  1851. 


OHAP.  TIL    OBIEMTAL  CHURCH.    { 48&  MECHITHABI8T8.    NE8TOEIAN8.    665 

CHAP.  Vn.— THE    ORIENTAL    CHURCH. 

§  483.     Catholie  and  Protestant  Influences. 

Greek  and  Armenian  congregations  composed  of  exiles  or  of  persons  en- 
gaged in  mercantile  pursuits  in  Catholic  countries,  were  obliged  to  purchase 
public  protection  by  an  acknowledgment  of  the  papal  primacy,  and  of  the 
procession  of  the  Holy  Ghost  from  the  Son  as  well  as  from  the  Father.  In 
return  for  this  the  pope  conceded  to  them  the  usages  of  their  countr}*,  to- 
gether with  the  cup  for  the  laity,  and  the  marriage  of  their  priests.  Among 
the  Armenians  the  MeehitharUts  were  confirmed  by  Clement  XL  as  Benedic- 
tines (1712),  and  after  the  fall  of  Modon  (s.  1717),  in  imitation  of  their 
founder  Meehithar  (Comforter,  1676*1749),  they  founded  a  monastery  at  St. 
Lazarus  among  the  lagoons  of  Venice,  which  was  designed  to  be  a  medium 
of  literary  intercourse  between  their  native  country  and  Europe.  A  branch 
of  it  was  established  at  Vienna,  which  has  confined  its  pious  literary  views 
to  Germany,  (a)  In  Tranayhania  the  Wallachians  were  induced  by  the  Jes- 
uits to  enter  the  Union  (s.  1697),  but  a  holy  monk  who  came  over  the  moun- 
tains (1744)  filled  the  people  with  horror  at  this  alliance,  (b)  As  soon  as  the 
liberty  for  which  the  Hungarian  Protestants  had  contended  (§  470),  was  con- 
ceded also  to  the  United  Greeks,  the  result  was  likely  to  threaten  their  union 
with  the  Roman  Church.  When  the  American  missionaries  opened  schools 
(since  1831)  among  the  Armenians  in  Constantinople  and  Trebizond,  and  dis- 
tributed bibles  among  the  people,  many  have  been  opposed  to  all  worship  of 
creatures,  and  to  some  other  portions  of  the  Armenian  forms  of  service,  and 
have  finally  been  excommunicated  (1846).  Separate  congregations  were 
therefore  indispensable,  and  when  formed  they  experienced  the  most  bitter 
persecutions,  in  consequence  of  an  order  from  the  patriarch  requiring  that  all 
persons  should  withhold  from  them  the  ordinary  intercourse  of  social  and 
commercial  life.  But^  in  consequence  of  the  intercessions  of  others  in 
their  behalf,  and  the  favor  of  the  Turks  toward  a  form  of  worship  dispensing 
with  images  and  pictures,  they  have  gradually  attained  a  tranquil  state,  (c) 
The  American  missionaries  have  likewise  succeeded  in  confirming  (since 
1833)  in  the  knowledge  of  the  Scriptures  those  remnants  of  the  Nestorians 
which  still  exist  in  the  mountains  of  Kurdistan,  and  which  had  become  mere 
petrifactions  of  the  Church  of  the  fifth  century,  and  so  far  as  they  had  not 
become  subject  to  the  pope,  established  them  as  the  Protestants  of  the  East  (d) 
In  many  other  countries  where  the  Oriental  Chnrch  prevails,  schools  have 
been  established  and  the  Scriptures  have  been  distributed  by  Protestant  mis- 


a)  (Klnver)  YiU  deir  Abate  Mechltar.  Yen.  ISIO.  Compendloee  notizie  8iilU  congregazlone  dd 
MechiUriHtL  Yen.  (1819.)  18S5.  WindUehtnann  d.  J.  In  d.  TQb.  Qoartalachr.  1S85.  P.  1.  Bheinw. 
Bep.  ToL  XXVIII.  Ik  168m.  XXX,  \61n. 

h)  Acta  hist  ecc  toI  X  p.  110m. 

e)  BrL  KZ.  184&  N.  8ft.  77. 1S17.  N.  86.  42.  6S.    A.  KZ.  1847.  N.  186a. 

d)  A.  Grant,  The  Nestoriana,  or  The  Loet  Tribea,  New  York  A  Lend.  1841. 12ma  (On  the  other 
hand:  K  Robinson,  [in  Bibl.  Rep.  fur  1841.]  Review  of  Grant'a  Nestor.  New  York.  1841.)  [O.  P, 
Badger^  Neetorlann  and  their  ritnals,  Ac  Lond.  1851.  S  Tola  8.]  BniD&  Sep.  1845.  roL  I.  p.  ISSea.  II, 
90W.  UI,  8408. 18M.  Tol.  Y.  pp.  107, 198^  89tei.  YI,  86ml 


666  MODEBN  CHUBOH  HIBTOBT.    PK&  YL    A.  D.  1M»-1861 

Bionaries,  until  the  Oriental  Christians  have  themselves  hegnn  to  test  the  doc- 
trines of  their  Church  hy  the  Word  of  God,  and  oomplaints  have  heen  made 
that  the  authority  of  the  Church  has  been  impaired.  («) 

§484.    JSussia.     Cont.  from  ^  ^18. 

King,  Tito  ritos  of  the  Greek  Churcb  in  Raasla.  Land.  1732.  4  Rlf.  177a.  4  (Act*  hist  ecc  iio»- 
tri  temp.  vol.  I.  p.  1.  ISTss.)  //iip«l,  klrchl.  StaUsL  r.  Ross.  (Nord.  Mlac  Rig^  1786.  Sect.  11  ae.)  BelUr- 
mann,  Ahr.  d.  ICum.  K.  Erf.  17S9.  A.  cU  StourdMii^  Considerations  soria  doctrine  et  I'esprit  de  TegL 
orthtNi.  Weim.  1816.  Q.  by  KuUebtu^  Lpfl^  1S17.  Pinkerion,  RoasU.  Lond.  1838.  (Er.  KZ.  1884  N. 
71^A.)  Briefe  Q.  d.  Qottesd.  d.  morg.  K.  a.  d.  Rust,  (by  Mnrawfeff)  by  E,  «.  Jfurait,  Lpii  1S83.  with 
Krkl:ir.  Anltang  als  Lcxidion  iL  morg.  K.  by  Ibid.  LfM.  1838.  [A.  Kic  MuratcUf,  Hist  of  the  Church 
of  Russia,  transl.  (from  the  Rnssian.  Petersb.  1838.)  by  Blackmore,  Oxt  1842.]  Die  Staatak  Rossi. 
Im  J.  1S89.  by  a  priest  of  the  Oratory.  SehaflTb.  1844  Die  Bedent  d.  nusi  K.  flir  d.  gegenw.  (Deotaehe 
ViertelJ.  8chr.  184V.  N.  19.)  JHo^a,  Rossi  Iclrchl.  SUtlst  (Renter,  Rep.  1850.  H.  1.)  He/eU,  d.  nus. 
K.  (Tub.  Qnartalsch.  1S53.  H.  &)  A,  v.  IlasBikawien^  Stadien  fL  d.  Innem  Zost  RoaeL  Han.  1817. 2 
vols.  [De  Cnntine  (MarqnisX  The  Empire  of  the  Czar,  or,  Obes.  on  the  8oc  PoL  A  Rel.  aiate  and 
Prospects  of  R.,  ft-om  the  French.  8  vols.  8.  Lond.  1847.  R.  W.  Blaeknun^  Doot  of  the  Boaiw  Chnreh, 
transL  fh>m  tlie  Slavono-Ruas.  Orlginah.  Aberdeen.  184S.  8.] 

The  orthodox  emperor  was  now  the  natural  protector  of  the  orthodox 
Oriental  Churcli,  with  a  power  in  hoth  hemispheres  such  as  no  successor  of 
Constantine  ever  possessed.  After  the  death  of  the  patriarch,  Hadrian 
(1702),  Peter  the  Great  allowed  his  see  to  remain  vacant  until  the  people  had 
become  accustomed  to  see  its  duties  performed  by  a  college  of  prelates,  which, 
under  the  name  of  the  Holy  Synod,  was  declared  to  be  the  supreme  author- 
ity in  the  Church  (1721).  (a)  This  synod  is  dependent  upon  the  emperor, 
but  the  dignity  of  the  clergy  and  the  peculiarities  of  the  ecclesiastical  polity 
are  determined  by  the  national  character.  But  Catharine  first  took  posses- 
sion of  all  the  property  of  the  Church,  and  then  settled  upon  nearly  all  eccle- 
siastical offices  and  institutions  a  permanent  but  very  moderate  revenue.  On 
the  other  hand  the  convents  were  relieved  of  the  charge  of  invalids,  and  sem- 
inaries were  established  for  education.  The  clergy  are  in  the  habit  of  filling 
their  ranks  from  their  own  families  very  much  as  if  they  were  a  spiritual 
caste.  Sermons  were  at  one  time  prohibited,  so  that  no  new  doctrines  might 
be  propagated  among  the  people,  but  many  primitive  and  symbolical  usages 
Lave  been  tenaciously  preserved  in  the  affections  of  the  people.  The  eccle- 
siastical language  is  the  old  Sclavonic.  Many  persons  were  dissatisfied  on  ac- 
count of  the  innovations  made  in  the  liturgy  by  the  patriarch,  Nieon^  and 
withdrew  from  the  Established  Church  (1666).  By  those  from  whom  they 
thus  separated  they  were  denominated  Bo$kolniki^  but  by  themselves  thej 
were  called  StaroterzL  They  conscientiously  adhere  to  all  the  institutions 
of  their  ancestors,  abominate  the  fashions  and  articles  of  luxury  which  have 
been  introduced  in  modem  times,  and  do  not  recognize  the  Czar  as  the  con- 
secrated head  of  the  Church.  Many  new  sects  have  sprung  from  them,  and 
in  consequence  of  the  persecutions  they  have  endured,  many  of  them  have 
become  the  victims  of  a  gloomy  fanatical  spirit  The  Duchoborzi  believe  in 
no  ecclesiastical  connection  except  that  which  exists  between  kindred  minds, 
but  they  are  friends  of  the  strictest  morality.    Others  have  adopted  a  mode 


€)  Hist  pol.  Bll.  186&  vol.  XXX.  H.  6. 

a)  KHiat  Archiv.  18-28.  voL  L  sect.  4  p.  87aL 


CUAP.  YIL    OBIENTAL  OUUBCH.    $481  RUSSIA.    ALEXANDER.  667 

of  worsliip  iDtermediate  between  the  extremes  of  abominable  lust  on  the  one 
hand,  and  of  ennuchism  on  the  other,  (b)  While  endeavoring  to  elevate  the 
intellectnal  character  of  his  people,  Aleicander  did  much  to  improve  the  con- 
dition of  the  National  Church.  On  all  lands  belonging  to  the  crown  village- 
schools  were  established,  the  seminaries  were  improved,  and  the  priests  were 
exempted  from  the  punishment  of  the  knout.  The  national  struggle  against 
Napoleon  subsequently  became  a  war  for  religion.  In  mature  life  the  pecu- 
liar fortunes  and  plans  of  the  emperor  iuolined  him  (since  1812)  to  a  melan- 
choly style  of  piety.  (<;)  When  the  British  and  Foreign  Bible  Society  was 
formed  in  London,  at  the  emperor^s  request  a  general  auxiliary  was  established 
at  Petersburg  (since  1813),  and  under  the  supervision  of  the  Holy  Synod  an 
edition  of  the  New  Testament  was  published  in  the  Rnssian  language  (1821), 
and  was  afterwards  gradually  sent  forth  in  almost  every  dialect  of  every  na- 
tion in  the  empire.  Wiih  simple  confidence  the  Bible  was  placed  by  the 
people  among  their  sacred  pictures,  but  an  ecclesiastical  opposition  was  ex- 
cited against  it  throughout  the  nation,  which  was  strengthened  by  observing 
certain  erroneous  applications  of  passages  of  the  Scriptures  made  by  the  peo- 
ple. The  emperor  was  therefore  finally  induced  to  abolish  the  Bible  Society 
in  Russia  (1826).  (d)  And  yet  the  imperial  government  felt  constrained  to 
do  something  for  the  conversion  of  his  heathen  and  Mohammedan  subjects  in 
three  distinct  quarters  of  the  world.  Ecclesiastical  institutions  were  estab- 
lished for  the  education  of  missionaries,  and  inducements  were  held  out  to 
those  who  might  become  converts  to  Christianity.  Under  Nicolas  a  plan  has 
been  formed  ond  generally  favored  by  the  people  (since  1825),  according  to 
which  the  whole  Russian  nationality  is  to  be  civilized  by  efibrts  from  within 
itself,  and  all  the  tribes  subject  to  its  government  are  to  become  one  in  lan- 
guage and  in  creed.  By  the  conquest  of  a  portion  of  the  Persian  territories 
(1828)  Russia  obtained  possession  of  a  great  part  of  Armenia,  including  the 
convent  of  Echmiadzin,  the  principal  seat  of  the  Catholicus  of  the  Armenian 
Church,  by  whoni  alone  the  bishops  and  the  holy  oil  could  be  consecrated. 
Measures  were  however  taken  by  the  Armenian  Church  to  prevent  its  incor- 
poration with  the  Russian,  (e)  Peter  I.  gave  freedom  of  worship  to  both 
Catholics  and  Protestants,  but  this  indulgence  was  confined  to  those  foreigners 
who  resided  in  the  country,  and  were  needed  in  the  public  service.  When 
Catharine  II.  acquired  possession  of  the  Polish  Russian  provinces,  a  part  of 
the  i)opulation  became  members  of  the  United  Greek  Church  (p.  482),  and 
another  part  united  with  the  Russian.  But  even  those  who  were  deeply  im- 
bued with  the  Roman  element  finally  yielded  to  the  prevalent  inclination,  and 


b)  Strahl,  Sectenw.  d.  rius.  K.  (KHlst  Archiv.  1334.  Sect  4.  p.  Mm.  193A.  SMt  1.  p.  42sa.) 
Letu,  de  Duchoborzis.  Dorp.  1329.  P.  L  (Jen.  I«.  Z.  N.  1660.)  £r.  KZ.  1828.  N.  Ofiss.  1885.  N.  lOss. 
Rhelnw.  Rep.  vol.  XXII.  p.  9T08S. 

e)  Specially  Pinkertan:  H.  H  E.  Notiz  (L  Alex.  Jonft.  182a  [Lond  Weekly  Ber.  for  Majt, 
1829.  (In  LlttellV  HeL  Mag.  vol  III.  p.  5028A.  Pbllad.  1829.)  SehnitMUr,  8ecr.  H.  of  the  Coart  <k 
QoY.  of  BnralA  under  Alcsc.  ^  Nioulaa.  Lond.  1847.  2  rola  8l] 

d)  Knp.  Pinkerton  :  A.  KZ.  1822.  N.  70.  1840.  N.  40.  llOaa. 

«)  VaUfr,  Anbau.  vol  IL  p.  lllas.  KIIIsL  Arch.  1828.  P.  L  Knrze  hist  Darst  d.  gegenw.  Zatt  d. 
arm.  Volkn.  Petersb.  1821.  Smith  &  Dwight,  Researches  In  Ann.  Boat  1888.  2  roK  TholHck^  lit. 
Anz.  1582.  N.  17.  [ JV.  ChamtcK,  H.  of  Armenia,  tranaL  di  cent  to  the  prceent  time  bjr  J.  Ardall, 
Calcutta.  1»27.  2  vols.  8.] 


668  HODEBN  OHUBCH  HISTORY.    P£R.  TI.    A.  D.  164S-18B8L 

after  much  preparation,  the  higher  olergy  of  Lithoania  and  White  Rnasia  at 
the  Synod  of  Polotsk  (Feh.  12,  1889)  declared  that  their  people  were  anxious 
to  return  to  the  ancient  mother  Church.  By  order  of  the  emperor  the  Holy 
Synod  received  them,  together  with  their  congregations,  as  those  who  had 
heen  separated  hy  violence  and  were  now  reunited  hy  love.  (/)  Gregory 
XVI.,  after  having  condemned  the  Polish  insurrection  (1881)  and  having  suc- 
ceeded in  persuading  Gutkoroski,  Bishop  of  Podlachien,  (g)  who  had  heen 
imprisoned  for  his  fidelity  to  the  Russian  Ohurch,  to  ahandon  it  (1840),  now 
beheld  the  schools  in  Poland  closed  against  all  ecclesiastical  influence,  the 
confiscated  property  of  the  Ohurch  given  to  a  Greek  nobility,  the  real  estate 
which  had  belonged  to  the  hierarchy  taken  possession  of  by  the  state,  all  in- 
tercourse between  the  bishops  and  Rome  prohibited,  and  the  Catholic  princi- 
ple with  respect  to  mixed  marriages  turned  against  the  Catholic  Church. 
Nothing  was  now  left  him  but  to  lift  up  his  lamentations  over  the  distressed 
condition  of  the  Church,  and  the  loss  of  two  millions  of  Catholios,  and  to 
expose  to  the  world  the  means  by  which  this  had  been  accomplished,  (h) 
Macrena  Mieszlawska,  the  late  Abbess  of  the  Basilian  convent  at  Minsk,  ap- 
peared at  Rome  with  a  shocking  account  of  these  means,  but  there  were 
enough  who  knew  how  to  render  it  doubtful  whether  she  was  a  martyr  or  an 
impostor,  (i)  But  the  pope  and  the  emperor  had  occasion  to  enter  into  an 
agreement  (1847s.),  according  to  which  a  new  diocese  of  Cherson  has  been 
formed,  whose  bishops  are  to  be  chosen  by  the  emperor,  but  oanonically  insti- 
tuted by  the  pope ;  whose  consistorials  and  teachers  of  seminaries  are  to  be 
appointed  by  the  bishops,  but  with  a  reference  to  the  pleasure  of  the  govern- 
ment. These  bishops  had  also  the  management  of  the  spiritual  affairs  of 
their  diocese  in  canonical  dependence  upon  the  holy  see.  Other  matters  re- 
specting which  they  could  not  then  agree  were  left,  in  hope  of  some  future 
arrangement.  (Ir)  A  constitution  has  been  given  (1883)  to  the  Lutheran  Church 
by  the  emperor,  which  is  well  fitted  to  preserve  order  and  exclude  all  innova- 
tion. {I)  Protestantism,  although  secured  in  the  interior  of  the  empire  by 
long  established  concessions,  and  in  the  German  provinces  on  the  Bdtic  sea 
by  treaties,  must  nevertheless  lose  ground  with  each  generation  on  account 
of  the  many  laws  and  civil  proceedings  in  favor  of  the  Established  Church,  (m) 
In  the  year  1845  when  the  Letts  and  Esthonians  were  reduced  to  extreme  dis- 
tress, a  rumor  became  current  among  them  that  those  who  would  pass  over 
to  the  orthodox  faith  should  obtain  possession  of  the  landed  property  of  their 


/)  XJe.  d.  WiederTereIn,  d.  Unlaten  m.  d.  reclitgliab.  K.  (from  the  Nordtsehen  Blene)  0.  v.  A.  r. 
Oldekop.  Stattg.  1840.    A.  Z.  1889.  Sappl.  N.  828sb.  1340.  N.  Iftl. 

17)  A.  Z.  1840.  N.  157. 169.  171.  A.  KZ.  1&40.  N.  66. 

h)  AllocuUon  of  Not.  82 :  A.  Z.  1889.  N.  887.  of  July  28 :  Brl  KZ  1842.  N.  6S.  Esposidone  cor- 
redato  di  docnmenti  salle  InoeasanU  care  delta  steasa  Saotttd  saa  a  ripAro  del  gravl  tnali,  da  cat  e  af' 
fllttalarel  cattollea  negli  Imperiall  e  reall  doinlnil  di  Raasla  e  dl  PolonU.  Bom.  1842.  t  Eioaied. 
1842.— (^.  ThHner)  Die  nenst  Zuat  d.  katb.  K.  belder  RItiu  In  Polen  u.  Raaal.  a.  Kathar.  IL  Auf^ 
1841.  2  voI&  {Sausfn)  Der  Czar  n.  der  Nachfolger  d.  h.  Petruib  Mayenoa  1848.  Brans ;  Rtp.  lS43k 
▼oL  L  p.  179w.  II,  273SS. 

0  D.  A.  Z  1846.  N.  86.  8nppl  67.  7a  118s. 

k)  Alloc  of  jQly  8, 1848 :  Bri.  KZ  1848.  N.  62.  A.  Z  1848.  N.  208.  SappL 

I)  Ev.  KZ  1834.  N.  5«.    Rdhi',  Pr.  Blbl.  1884.  P.  4  p.  657a8L 

m)  Comp.  A.  Z  1S40.    SoppL  N.  153a.  168a. 


CHAP.  YIL    OBIENTAL  CHURCH.    |48Si  OBEECE.  669 

German  landlords,  and  some  fanciful  hopes  were  held  up  to  them  connected 
with  the  Grand  Dake  Michael  (according  to  Daniel  XI,  89.  XII,  1).  Fifteen 
thousand  peasants  were  accordingly  confirmed,  and  churches  were  huilt  by 
the  government  for  these  new  converts  in  all  parts  of  the  country,  (n)  Ger- 
man princesses,  when  they  became  connected  with  the  family  of  the  Czar, 
were  obliged  to  convince  themselves  that  the  Evangelical  Church  was  in 
error,  (o) 

§  486.     Greece  and  Turkey. 

IfMnder,  Progr.  d.  BIbelgeflL  BrI.  1S80.  JTM;  de  Ecc  graeca,  Hv.  proTldentlae  teste.  Lngd.  1881. 
IfartUy,  Researches  In  Greece.  Lond.  1881.  (Ev.  KZ.  1882.  N.  ISas.)  F.  Fenger^  om  det  NygraetOce 
Folk  og  Sprog.  KJobenh.  1883.  (Ev.  KZ.  1882.  N.  878.)  F.  Thiertch,  Esaai  8ar  I'etat  actocl  de  la 
Or6ce.  lda&  2  vols.  O.  L.  «.  Maurer^  d.  griech.  Volk  in  offentl.  klrchl.  n.  privatr.  Bozleh.  Hefdlb. 
1585.  2  vols.  J.  Wtnger^  Beltr.  z.  Kenntn.  d.  gegenw.  Oelstes  n.  ZusL  d.  gr.  K.  In  Or.  u.  d.  TQrkef. 
Brl  1S89.  Rheinw.  Rep.  vol.  XV.  p.  16898.  XVII.  185.  255ft9.  XVIII.  177s9.  XXVII.  173.  276a9w  (Ae- 
cording  to  Brandts.  Lps.  1643.  vol.  IIL)  XXXVIII.  p.  187.  28998.  K^gl.  orthod.  d'Orlent  AUien. 
1858.— TT.  Klone,  d.  Christen  In  d.  Tarkei  (Zeitach.  f.  hist  Tb.  1850.  H.  3.)  [S,  O.  IToiee,  Hist  Sketeh 
of  the  Or.  Rev.  New  York.  1828.  8.     T.  Gordon^  H.  of  the  Or.  Rev.  Ac  Lond.  1843.  2  ed.  2  vols.  8.] 

In  the  spring  of  1821,  when  the  Greek  people  awoke  from  their  long  slum- 
ber, the  bishops  pronounced  their  blessings  upon  the  insurrection.  The  exe- 
cution of  the  aged  patriarch,  Gregory^  on  Easter  Sunday,  before  the  gates  of 
his  own  palace,  tore  asunder  the  last  link  which  connected  a  down-trodden 
people  with  their  tyrants.  It  is  true  that  a  policy  quite  foreign  to  all  Chris- 
tian sympathies  prevented  an  earlier  termination  of  their  sanguinary  and 
tedious  troubles,  and  allowed  Greece  to  receive  boundaries  which  nature 
never  intended  for  it ;  but  it  soon  entered  unavoidably  into  the  magic  circle 
of  European  improvement,  and  with  all  the  energy  of  an  independent  nation 
endowed  with  noble  capacities  were  produced  the  first  shoots  of  an  ecclesi- 
astical literature,  (a)  In  the  zeal  of  the  people  for  liberal  views,  the  civil 
and  judicial  authority  of  the  episcopal  court  was  speedily  broken  down,  (b) 
As  it  was  impossible  that  the  Church  should  continue  dependent  upon  a  pa- 
triarch appointed  by  the  sultan,  an  assembly  of  bishops  at  Syra  (Aug.  1888) 
was  directed  by  the  government  to  declare,  that  the  orthodox  Church  of 
Greece  acknowledged  no  head  but  Jesus  Christ,  that  the  administration  of  the 
Church  belonged  to  the  king,  and  was  to  be  carried  on  under  the  direction 
of  the  sacred  canons  by  a  Synod  of  Bishops  permanently  appointed,  but  an- 
nually renewed  by  him.  (c)  By  this  measure  on  the  part  of  a  Catholic  gov- 
ernment, and  by  the  abolition  of  the  inferior  convents,  to  obtain  an  ecclesi- 
astical and  school  fund  (1884),  the  feelings  of  the  nation  in  behalf  of  its 
Church  were  wounded.  The  first  exhibition  of  its  displeasure  with  respect 
to  the  new  improvements  was  made  against  the  schools  and  books  of  the  Eng- 
lish and  American  missions,  (d)    The  conspiracy  of  the  orthodox  Hetairia 


n)  A.  Z.  1845.  N.  2188.  Bri.  KZ.  1815.  N.  89.  lOOs.  1848.  N.  4  1817.  N.  67. 1849.  N.  97.  99. 

o)  £.  g.  Rheinw.  Rep.  vol.  XXXIII.  p.  8668L 

a)  RiMo  NerouloM^  Conrs  de  literature  greoqne  modeme,  pnbL  par  J.  Humbert,  Oen.  1827.  Wie* 
deranfinge  d.  tbeol.  Lit  in  Oriechenl.  (Stud.  n.  Krlt  1841.  P.  1.)  Surroy/xa  r&v  ^timv  koL  ltp&¥  lea- 
y6vtȴ,  ed.  G,  A.  RaUi9  et  M.  BottU,  Athen.  1853.  2  vola.       d)  GHb,  (p.  867.)  p.  ll&a. 

e)  A.  KZ.  1833.  N.  191. 

d)  A.  Z.  1887.  Snppl  N.  184.  A.  KZ.  1887.  N.  82.  D.  A.  Z.  184fi.  Buppl  N.  8«2.  The  chteT  organ. 
1^  f  ^oyyc Aiicf^  viKwiylt  edited  bj  the  monk  Oennanoa. 


670  MODERN  CllUltCn  HI8T0ET.    PER.  VL    A,  D.  1648-18Sa. 

was  designed  to  destroy  every  thing  of  a  foreign  natnre  which  had  been  forced 
upon  the  nation,  and  to  place  the  Ohnrch  (1889)  nnder  the  jurisdiction  of  the 
patriarch  Gregory  VI.  (e)  This  prelate  published  a  challenge  ag^nst  Lu- 
ther, prohibited  the  circulation  of  translations  of  the  Scriptures,  (/)  and  for- 
bade the  nuptial  benediction  upon  mixed  marriages  in  the  Ionian  Islands.  For 
these  proceedings  he  was,  at  the  request  of  the  English  ambassador,  deposed 
(1840).  (g)  The  revolution  of  1843,  professing  to  act  in  the  name  of  national 
freedom,  threw  away  all  the  supports  of  German  education  and  improve- 
ment. The  Constitution  of  1844  recognized  the  orthodox  Oriental  Church 
as  established  by  law,  required  that  the  successor  to  the  throne  should  be  a 
member  of  that  Church,  and  while  it  gave  free  toleration  to  other  forms  of 
worship,  it  forbade  efforts  to  proselyte  in  their  favor.  The  ecclesiastical  sta- 
tute of  1845  gave  to  the  Synod  a  position  much  less  dependent  upon  the 
government  (A)  It  was  recognized  by  the  Patriarch  of  Constantinople 
through  the  mediation  of  Russia  (1850),  on  the  condition  that  its  holy  ofl 
should  always  be  obtained  from  the  mother  Church,  but  it  was  itself  to  be 
chosen  by  the  clergy,  and  the  Bishop  of  Attica  was  to  be  its  perpetual  presi- 
dent, (i)  The  city  of  Athens,  then  the  principal  town,  was  dedicated  to  an- 
other Virgin,  (h)  but  there  is  a  prophecy  current  among  the  people  that  at 
some  future  day  the  cross  will  be  fixed  upon  the  Church  of  St.  Soplua.  A 
tranquil  existence  has  finally  been  secured  to  the  Christians  under  the  do- 
minion of  the  sultan,  in  consequence  of  his  enfeebled  condition,  the  European 
reforms  which  he  has  introduced,  and  the  dependence  of  his  empire  upon 
Christian  powers.  By  the  Hattisherif  of  Gtilhane  (1889)  a  promise  was  given 
that  the  life,  honor,  and  property  of  all  should  be  secure,  and  that  Moslem 
and  Rayah  should  be  equal  in  the  eye  of  the  law,  (I)  but  the  government  is 
sometimes  unable  to  prevent  individual  instances  of  abuse  from  the  corrup- 
tion of  the  inferior  authorities,  and  the  fanaticism  of  the  people,  (m)  It  is, 
however,  the  i)ower  under  which  all  the  difiTerent  parties  of  the  Oriental 
Church,  and  the  Franks  under  their  respective  consuls,  find  a  residence,  with 
no  power  to  iryure  but  only  to  hate  each  other.  The  position  of  the  porte 
even  with  respect  to  the  holy  places,  for  the  keys  of  which  Russia,  in  behalf 
of  the  newly  acquired  rights  of  the  Greek  Church,  and  France,  in  behalf  of 
the  long  established  rights  of  the  Latin  Church,  contended  with  each  other, 
is  only  that  of  a  mediator,  (n)  But  when  Russia  claimed  to  be  the  perma* 
nent  protector  of  the  orthodox  Christians  who  constitute  a  large  minority  of 
the  population  of  European  Turkey,  it  has,  relying  upon  the  aid  of  Christian 
powers,  indignantly  repelled  the  demand  as  a  virtual  requirement  that  it 
should  resign  its  sovereignty,  and  the  Czar  has  therefore  proclaimed  against 
it  a  holy  war  (1858). 


0)  A.  Z.  1840.  N.  27.  80.  /)  AcU  hist  ecc  1887.  pi  SSlaa.  g)  A.KZ.  18ia  N.  8«i 
h)  A.  D.  Z.  1845.  N.  198.          0  BrL  KZ.  1851.  N.  8«.          I;)  A.  KZ.  18S2.  N.  48. 

1)  Beitrr.  z.  e.  Oesch.  d.  neosten  B«formeii  d.  o«in.  Beiohen  In  Verbind.  m.  Kftinte  EfendL  ed.  hf 
Petennann.  Brl.  1842. 

m)  (C  Pncaek;)  Die  Chiisfen  In  Bosnien.  Vienna.  1858L 

A)  Brl.  KZ.  1850.  N.  94. 1851.  N.  82. 1852.  N.  98.  1858.  N.  4L  oomp.  47. 


CHAP.  VIII.    GENERAL  AFFAIRS.    1 436.  CATHOLICISM  &  PROTESTANTISM.    67  1 

CHAP.  VIIL— COMMON  DETAILS  AND  MUTUAL  RELATIONS. 

§  486.     Catholicism  and  Protestantism, 

In  Gennonj  and  in  France  where  the  Catholic  and  Protestant  churches 
stand  side  bj  side  in  the  CDJoymont  of  equal  rights,  and  whore  the  national 
character  has  no  decisive  inclination  for  either,  there  must  naturally  be  an 
intellectual  conflict  between  them,  frequent  attempts  at  accommodation,  and 
mutual  aggressions  of  a  proselyting  spirit.  In  the  polemical  writings  of  Prot- 
estants, Catholicism  is  represented  as  a  system  of  priestcraft,  or  at  best  as  an 
antiquated  form  which  could  have  had  no  existence  except  when  the  mind  of 
man  was  in  a  state  of  pupilage.  The  Catholics  call  the  Reformation  the 
second  fall  of  man,  and  revive  the  old  but  now  especially  obnoxious  reproach 
that  the  Reformation  must  necessarily  end  with  a  revolution.  On  the  other 
hand,  the  advocate  of  Protestantism  shows  that  whatever  is  true  in  this  as- 
sertion threatens  no  danger  to  any  legal  form  of  civil  government,  but  only 
to  Catholicism,  and  that  as  far  as  it  is  untrue  facts  show  that  the  home  of 
revolutions  is  in  Catholic  countries,  (a)  This  subject  was  discussed  with 
more  calmness  by  literary  men  among  Protestants,  since,  instead  of  contem« 
plating  it  simply  as  a  polemical  matter,  they  investigated  the  respective 
creeds,  taking  a  purely  historical  view  of  the  different  systems  of  faith,  and 
regarding  them  as  points  of  development  for  the  Christian  spirit.  The  learn- 
ing of  a  Church  which  regards  all  beyond  itself  as  only  a  falsehood,  and  un- 
der condemnation,  could  never  entertain  such  a  train  of  thought  except  in 
appearance  only,  (b)  Besides,  that  was  often  attacked  which  no  one  ever 
defended,  on  the  one  side  unchangeable  Lutheranism,  and  on  the  other  an 
in£Edlible  papacy.  The  controversy  was  also  much  embittered  by  the  exagger^ 
ated  ecdesiasticism  which  prevailed  in  both  parties.  Even  a  Judas-literature 
became  connected  with  tlie  controversy  between  the  two  churches,  (e)  To 
such  as  had  become  dissatisfied  with  the  creeds  of  both  sides  it  seemed  easy 
to  become  reconciled.  Such  was  the  origin  (1797)  of  a  party,  Christo  sacrum^ 
in  the  French  Reformed  Churcli  at  Delft,  the  object  of  which  was  to  form  a 
common  ground  on  which  all  might  unite,  by  setting  forth  a  few  general  doc- 
trines relating  to  the  divinity  of  the  Scriptures,  and  redemption  by  Christ, 
without  requiring  any  to  renounce  the  Churches  in  which  they  had  been  re- 
spectively bom.  It  went  indeed  so  far  as  to  assemble  after  its  public  recog- 
nition (1802}  a  few  members  of  different  churches  in  their  house  of  worship, 
but  it  was  universally  rejected  by  all  churches,  and  never  became  any  thing 
but  a  very  inferior  sect,  {d)  The  Freemasons^  Lodges  originated  among  the 
Societies  of  architects  of  the  middle  ages,  and  even  in  the  new  spiritual- 
ized form  which  their  craft  received  fVom  England,  where  it  was  ex- 
tensively proi)agated  (1717),  it  kept  aloof  from  all  tlie  contentions  of  the  dif- 


a)  TUehimer,  Prot.  n.  Kath.  a.  d.  Standp.  d.  Polltlk.  Lps.  192S.  4  ed.  1SS4 

b)  MoehUr^  (p.  6K.)    On  the  other  hand :  Baur,  Nttzseb,  Marhelneke. 

c)  Der  Protesuuitbmos  In  a.  tklbaUaflusung.  Schaffh.  (1848.)  1816.  S  vols.  comp.  BrL  KZ.  18ML 

d)  Archiv  £  KGecch.  voL  L  seet  2.  p.  170«l  Mct  &  p.  190sa.    KHist  Arch.  1828.  sect  1.  p.  12m, 
FUsdner^  Collectenreise.  toL  IL  p.  074s8. 


672  MODERN  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  VL    A.  D.  I<i6-18B8. 

ferent  churches,  and  professed  in  a  region  far  above  them  to  construct  the 
temple  of  Humanity.  For  this  very  reason  it  was  condemned  (p.  634)  in  va- 
rious papal  decrees  (1738,  1751,  1829,)  which  were,  however,  enlorced  only 
in  Southern  Europe.  («)  The  Evangelical  Church  Journal  also  condemned 
them,  and  received  an  answer  through  an  act  of  the  royal  family  (Nor.  5, 
1853). '(/)  The  Rationalists  on  account  of  their  Pelagian  tendency,  and  the 
Pietists  on  account  of  their  rigid  ecclesiasticism,  were  accused  of  an  approxi- 
mation to  Catholicism.  A  few  regarded  every  kind  of  anion  as  impractica- 
ble except  by  the  absorption  of  one  party  into  the  other ;  (g)  some  believed 
in  a  higher  development  of  the  present  ecclesiastical  system,  in  which  the 
distinctions  between  the  two  parties  were  to  be  forgotten ;  while  many  looked 
upon  these  distinctions  as  salutary  in  their  influence,  and  indispensable  to  the 
completeness  of  the  Christian  spirit.  (A)  Persons  were  frequently  induced  to 
pass  from  one  Church  to  the  other  by  the  prospect  of  some  personal  advan- 
tage, or  under  the  influence  of  false  views.  Such  instances  were  tolerated 
especially  in  the  Catholic  Church,  on  account  of  their  relation  to  future  gen- 
erations. Others  were  governed  by  considerations  altogether  foreign  to 
Christianity.  Such  was  Winkelmann  (d.  1768),  who  thought  that  the  great 
object  of  his  life,  which  could  be  pursued  only  at  Rome,  was  well  worth  a 
mass ;  especially  as  he,  with  all  his  recollections  of  pious  youthful  impressions, 
was  neither  a  Catholic  nor  a  Protestant,  but  a  contemporary  of  Perides.  (t) 
But  some  were  really  anxious  to  correct  by  their  own  free  act  what  thej 
honestly  believed  to  be  the  false  position  in  which  the  accident  of  birth  had 
placed  them.  The  primary  occasion  for  most  of  the  conversions  to  Catholi- 
cism was  that  exalted  state  of  artistic  or  poetic  feeling  which,  when  it  became 
depressed,  fell  into  pietism,  but  which  found  in  the  Catholic  Church  a  pleas- 
ant and  splendid  form  of  life,  or  at  least  found  deliverance  fh>m  a  state  of 
mere  irony,  and  a  position  in  the  earnestness  of  reality.  Another  canse  was, 
a  natural  disposition  which  was  annoyed  by  the  perpetual  conflicts  and  com- 
motions which  prevailed  in  the  Protestant  Church,  and  sought  peace  in  a  sen- 
suous nearness  to  the  divine,  and  in  an  external  and  infallible  authority.  It 
was  to  this  disposition  that  the  faithful  Voss^  who  mistook  its  more  profound 
motive,  opposed  in  a  violent  manner  his  Datch  common  sense.  (Jc)  There  was 
also  an  historical  and  political  spirit,  imposed  upon  by  the  mediaeval  splendor 
and  perfect  constitution  of  the  Catholic  Church,  which  might  not  only  be 
mistaken,  but  stimulated  to  further  misapprehensions,  and  so  finally  conducted 
to  a  path  which  terminated  at  Rome  and  Vienna.  (I)  K  few  aristocrats  hoped 

e\  Kraute^  d.  drcl  iltesten  Konst-Urk.  d.  F.  M.  Br&dench.  Dnd.  (1810.)  1819.  I".  W.  Lindner, 
Mac  BenAc  Lps.  1818.  Sareena,  Qesch.  d.  F.  M.  Ord.  Bamb.  1820.  6  ed.  Lpsi  1885.— M.  Ball,  Roni. 
vol  XVIII.  p.  212a.    Hist  poL  BL  vol  VIII.  p.  «3es. 

/)  D.  A.  Z.  1854.  N.  28. 

g)  {J.  A.  Stark,)  Theoduls  Gastmahl  a  Q.  Verelnlg.  d.  Religionflaooietftten.  Frk£  1809l  7  ad.  19S9L 

A)  Planck,  Worte  d.  Friedens  an  d.  kath.  K.  gegen  Ihre  Yorelnig.  m.  d.  prot  Oott  1909.  Tom 
Strelte  d.  Kirchen,  an  den  ehrisU.  Adel  doata^her  Nation.  Lpa.  1827. 

f)  BrI.  MonatBcbr.  vol  XIL  p.  56ss.  Goeths,  Wlnkelm.  u.  s.  Jahrhandvrt.  KreeK,  Eiina  as  W. 
BrL  1885.  4 

k)  Wie  ward  Fritz  Stolberg  eln  Unf^eier?  (Sophronlzon.  1819.  toL  III.)  BeatitlguDg  d.  Slolbi 
Umtrlebe.  Stattg.  1820.-- J.  Meoloviu^  Ft.  Loop.  O.  zu  Stolb.  Mayenoe.  184a. 

/)  F.  HwrUr,  d.  Antlstas  IL  a.  aogen.  Amtabr&der.  Schaffb.  184a    ZeiSnd€r,  Ant  H.  n.  a.  T«n» 


CHAP.  YUL    ChBNEBAL  AFFAIB8.    |48ft.  00NYEBT8.  673 

they  could  get  rid  of  the  revolution  by  forsaking  the  Reformation.  Hack- 
neyed authors,  who  before  knew  nothing  of  religion,  found  in  the  Catholic 
ritual  that  which  interested  and  satisfied  their  excited  religious  wants,  (m) 
Sacerdotal  Puseyism,  and  even  zealous  Lutheranism,  estranged  as  it  is  from 
the  present  Protestant  Ohurch,  have  sometimes  conducted  their  lost  sons  back 
to  the  holy  father,  (n)  On  the  other  hand,  there  were  two  ways  by  which  a 
Catholic  might  be  conducted  to  the  Protestant  Church.  The  first  was  the 
same  feeling  which  at  one  time  moved  the  Reformers,  a  painful  sense  of  sin 
which  found  no  relief  in  the  works  and  penances  of  the  Church,  and  finally 
betook  itself  to  a  simple  faith  in  the  Scriptures  alone.  The  other  was  a  de- 
velopment of  the  spirit  of  religious  independence,  which,  when  it  could  no 
longer  find  complete  truth  in  the  doctrines  which  it  had  been  taught,  felt 
compelled  to  break  loose  fh>m  an  infallible  Church.  The  former  path  con- 
ducted to  the  old,  and  the  latter  to  the  more  recent  form  of  Protestantism. 
The  latter  was  therefore  followed  by  individuals  of  a  speculative  turn  of 
mind,  or  such  as  thought  themselves  to  be  so,  while  the  former  was  entered 
npon  as  in  the  time  of  the  Reformation  by  whole  congregations,  pervaded  at 
once  by  the  same  feeling.  In  some  cases,  however,  where  the  feelings  of  such 
congregations  had  not  become  dearly  defined,  and  the  ecclesiastical  authori- 
ties treated  them  with  mildness,  they  could  sometimes  be  reconciled  with 
the  old  Church,  (p)  From  the  nature  of  the  feelings  thus  defined  we  should 
of  course  expect  to  meet  with  persons  of  more  distinguished  reputation 
among  the  converts  to  Catholicism,  (p)  For  it  was  necessary  to  the  pacifica- 
tion of  those  consciences  which  were  inclined  to  Catholicism  that  the  pre- 
cise form  should  be  complied  with,  and  that  the  person  should  be  a  member 
of  the  only  Church  in  which  salvation  could  be  expected,  while  the  Protes- 
tant spirit  generally  felt  that  it  was  every  where  in  the  spiritual  Church,  it 
would  naturally  hope  to  exert  a  more  powerfhl  influence  in  behalf  of  truth 
in  its  original  sphere  of  life,  and  it  would  dread  the  severe  shock  occasioned 
by  a  change  of  ecclesiastical  relations.  Hence  generally  only  such  priests  as 
apprehended  some  overwhelming  act  of  oppression  from  their  ecclesiastical 
superiors,  effected  an  escape  by  connecting  themselves  with  the  Protestant 
Church. 

gUmpftcn  AmUbr.  Scb.  l^M.-SchenkO,  Zorw&rfon  In  Scbaffb.  a.  Uurter's  Ucbortritt  Baa.  1341. 
JTurUr,  Gebnrt  n.  Wiedcrgeb.  Scbaffb.  (1S45.)  1847.  2  vola. 

m)  Ida  Orftfln  ffdhn'IIahn^  ron  Babylon  nacb  Jeraa.  Mayence.  1851.  [From  Babylon  to  Jeni« 
nlem,  ftom  the  Oonn.  of  Coontesi  Ida  t.  Hahn-Habn.  New  York.  1S52.]  F.  e.  Ftoreneouri^  mein* 
Bekehr.  z.  cbr.  Lebre  n.  K.  Paderb.  1852. 

n)  L&tkem&ller,  nnsre  Zost  v.  Tode  %.  Aofent  Lpa.  1852.  BrL  KZ.  1852.  N.  86. 

o)  Oeechlebtl  Dant  d.  B«kebrang  d.  Fflratcn  v.  Salm-Salni,  from  tbe  Fr.  (Par.  1826.)  Jen.  1826.— 
Ootansr^  Martin  Booa,  Lp&  1826.  [Life  A  Porsecntlona  of  M.  B.  transl  by  Bridges.  Lond.  1829L 
Lond.  Cbr.  Obsi  Jan.  1828.  (in  Llttell'a  BeL  Mag.  toL  L  pi  289s9i)]  JlenAq/!'''*  cnr.  Olaubensbek, 
Heldlb.  (1828.)  1824  DucMm^r,  RQckkchr.  katb.  Cbristen  in  Baden  z.  er.  CJbristentb.  Lpn.  1828.  4, 
ed.  1824.— Bericbt  n.  Karlabald  by  PdchtMr  vor  d.  Sammlnng  cv.  Prodigten.  Barmen.  1887.— J74)^«- 
ricK,  cbri5tl  Olanbensb.  Friedb.  1885.  On  tbe  other  side :  UfkundL  Darat  d.  piet  Umtriebe  d.  vor- 
xnaL  Plkr.  Heli:  Mayence.  1S8S.— j:  J.  Maurette,  d.  Papst  n.  d.  £7.  tnm  tbe  Fr.  Hoilbr.  184i.  8  ed. 
1846.    F.  Bruitte,  m.  Abacbiedswort  an  Bom.  from  the  Fr.  Scbleiz.  1844. 

p)  F,  W.  P. «.  AmvMn^  GaUerle  d.  merkw.  Personen,  welehe  r.  d.  ot.  z.  kath.  K.  iibergetretep. 
Sri.  1888.  J.  BbefUnghaut^  cbronoL  Vcrzelchniss  d.  denkw.  Bekehr.  t.  Protest  z.  katb.  K.  Ascbaft 
1887.  IfWfeh^  Q.  d.  Uraaehen  d.  aieh  mcbr.  Uebertrltte  z.  rdm.  K.  (Dentsohe  Zeitacb.  t  cbr.  W.  1S$1. 
N.  29.) 

48 


674  MODEBN  CHUBCH  HI8T0BT.    PER.  YL    A.  D.  164S-1668. 

§  487.     The  Fine  Arte.     Cont,  from  §  878,  390. 

Art  has  generally  risen  superior  to  all  distinctions  of  creeds,  althoagh  the 
populace  of  Strasbourg  would  not  tolerate  a  bust  of  Luther  on  the  monument 
of  Guttenberg,  (a)  and  even  some  painters  have  supposed  that  they  could  do 
better  justice  to  the  saints  when  they  adored  them.  Rome  became  once  more 
the  home  of  the  arts  of  design,  when,  from  the  time  of  Clement  XFV.,  a  beau- 
tiful temple  was  opened  for  the  remnants  of  the  old  Olympic  world,  with 
such  an  enthusiasm  for  the  arts  that  it  did  not  shrink  from  evea  a  sacrilege 
upon  the  sarcophagus  of  the  Scipios  and  of  St.  Helena.    Thorwaldsen  was 
directed  by  Consalvi  to  erect  a  lofty  monument  on  the  tomb  of  the  Holy  Fa- 
ther Pius  VII.  in  St.  Peter's  Church.  (5)    When  the  more  recent  popular  life 
had  been  developed,  the  Church  could  no  longer  ^ve  existence  to  the  art  from 
its  own  materials,  but  it  was  obliged  to  be  a  mere  participator  in  it.    By  a 
profound  study  of  the  monuments  of  heathen  antiquity,  Winielmann  rescued 
the  taste  for  the  arts  from  degenerating  into  a  trifling  mannerism.    What  he 
could  only  express  in  words  Thorwaldsen  embodied  in  brass  and  marble. 
Grecian  power  and  beauty,  it  is  true,  were  found  reproduced  in  living  fresh- 
ness in  his  studio,  but  as  an  expression  of  the  eternal  beauty  of  nature  they 
were  exalted  to  their  most  significant  form  when  employed  in  the  utterance 
of  Christian  ideas.    Gods  and  heroes  were  therefore  to  be  seen  there  by  the 
side  of  our  Lord  and  the  apostles,  (c)    At  a  still  earlier  period  Dannecher 
gave  a  sublime  representation  of  Christ  in  the  character  of  the  world's 
teacher ;  his  John  is  a  son  of  thunder  reflecting  upon  the  mystery  of  the 
Trinity ;  and  finally  he  is  himself  exhibited,  when  an  old  man,  contemplating 
the  smile  of  a  Christian  angel  of  death,  (d)    After  some  Hterary  attempts  to 
discover  the  general  basis  of  all  art  in  piety,  (e)  an  association  of  German 
painters  was  formed  at  Rome  (s.  1810)  which  endeavored  to  revive  the  art 
in  the  Christian  feelings  and  ecclesiastical  forms  of  the  middle  ages.    There 
is  a  kind  of  spectral  life  in  the  exaggerated  productions  of  this  Romantic 
School,    But  the  great  masters  of  it  have  each  in  his  own  way  revived  the 
splendors  not  only  of  the  middle  ages  but  of  antiquity.    Thus  Overbeck  has 
presented  a  delicate  pious  fervor,  and  Cornelius,  cheerfulness  and  sublimity. 
These  were  followed  by  Henry  Hess,  who  added  beauty  to  the  old  ecclesiasti- 
oal  style ;  Kaulbach,  who  has  painted  the  minds  and  general  thoughts  o( 
men ;  and  Lessing,  who  has  exhibited  Protestantism  in  the  persons  of  its  fore- 
runners. A  German  Union  for  religious  art  in  the  Evangelical  Church  (1851) 
evinces  an  inclination  to  pay  a  long  standing  debt  of  Protestantism.  (/)    In 
connection  with  this  interest  in  the  middle  ages  the  art  of  painting  on  glass 
has  been  once  more  discovered.    The  Cathedral  at  Milan  was  completed  by 
Napoleon.    Louis  of  Bavaria  restored  the  old  splendor  of  the  cathedrals  of 


I    a)  A.  KZ.  1840.  N.  128. 1848.  N.  204& 

h)  XoUoed  Indeed  In  A.  KZ.  of  1880.  N.  27,  but  not  erected  until  183L 

o)  ThUU,  Thorwaldsen'a  Leben  u.  Werk«.  Lpe.  18828.  2  vols,  t 

d)J.J.  UtM,  {L  Danneckera  Cbrlstua.  ZQr.  1826.    C  Gr&neUen  o.  TK  Wagner,  Dun.  Wtfkn 
Bamb.  (1842.)  4. 

•)  W.ir.  Wackmroder,  HenensorgieflsaDgen  e.  kunatliebenden  Klosterbr.  ed.  by  Tleek.  Btl  ITW. 
/)  BrL  KZ.  1852.  N.  20.  24.  82. 


CHAP.  YIIL    GENERAL  AFFAIRS.    1 488.  CHURCH  ARCHITECTURE  St  MUSia  675 

bis  kingdom,  and  had  all  the  different  forms  of  the  ecclesiastical  styles  of 
former  times  represented  in  the  churches  of  his  capital.  Frederic  WiUiam  III. 
had  the  Cathedral  of  Cologne  once  more  repaired  (since  1824),  and  Frederio 
IVilliam  IV.  laid  the  foundation  stone  for  its  completion  (Sept.  4th,  1842), 
that  it  might  be  a  work  of  brotherly  love  for  all  Germans,  (ff)  Isaac^s 
Church  of  Petersburg  raised  its  cupolas  and  granite  pillars  more  proudly  than 
any  other  church  of  Greco-Roman  architecture.  The  three  great  masters  of 
instrumental  music  at  Vienna  have  contributed  none  of  their  peculiarities  nor 
their  highelt  efforts  to  the  Church.  Haydn's  Creation,  great  as  it  is,  is  never- 
theless only  a  great  opera,  in  which  the  Lord  G^d  with  his  angels  are  repre- 
sented, (h)  Mozart  did  not  compose  his  Requiem  until  he  was  dying,  (i)  and 
BeetTiaoejij  in  his  own  exalted  sphere,  felt  that  he  was  a  priest  of  God,  but  not 
in  an  ecclesiastical  sense,  and  his  Christ  on  the  Mount  of  Olives  and  his  Sec- 
ond Mass  were  indeed  a  Creation,  but  they  never  reached  their  seventh  day. 
Felix  Mendelssohn^  who  had  been  educated  in  the  rigid  school  of  Sebastian 
Bach,  and  amid  the  glories  of  IlandeFs  art,  has  given  a  harmonious  expres- 
sion to  the  direct  Word  of  God,  combining  profound  devotional  earnestness 
with  cheerful  artistic  beauty,  especially  in  the  lyrical  strains  of  his  Psalms, 
and  in  the  more  dramatic  works  Paul  and  Elyah.  Like  Raphael,  however, 
he  was  taken  away  from  earth  (1847)  before  he  had  realized  in  his  language 
the  complete  ideal  of  his  Christ.  While  the  friends  of  art  in  Protestant  Ger- 
many, though  generally  without  reference  to  the  Church,  labored  to  promote 
an  understanding  and  love  of  the  old  ecclesiastical  muse,  {k)  the  Italian 
churches  resounded  with  the  most  frivolous  opera  melodies.  The  papal 
chapel  alone  preserved  the  old  serious  style,  though  much  of  the  skilful  per- 
formance of  former  days  was  lost.  When  the  mode  of  singing  hymns  in 
quartettes,  which,  in  some  Reformed  churches,  and  particularly  in  Switzer- 
land, was  an  inheritance  from  their  ancestors,  was  first  introduced  by  an  as- 
sociation in  Stuttgard,  and  recommended  by  the  Synod  of  Wurtemberg  (1828), 
many  voices  were  raised  against  it  on  the  ground  that  such  a  style  of  singing 
was  too  artistic  for  a  congregation.  (Z)  Liturgical  forms  of  divine  service 
were  brought  into  use  first  at  Berlin,  and  afterwards  in  other  places,  in  which 
the  old  Catholic  as  well  as  Protestant  masters  of  Church  music  were  re- 
vived, (m) 

§  488.    Emancipation  and  Conversion  of  the  Jetes, 

RiM94r,  der  Jude.  Alton.  133289.    O.  Wi  BohtMrj  Glelchstellang  der  Juden.  QOtt  1S88.    Jott^ 
neaere  Qesch.  d.  Israel  1815-45.  Brl  1846.  2  vols. 

Since  Moses  Mendelssohn  (d.  1786)  and  Lessing  gave  to  each  other  the 
hand  of  fellowship  the  Jews  have  participated  with  much  eagerness  and  suc- 


g)  Brl.  KZ.  1942.  N.  7a  1848.  N.  69. 1849.  N.  80. 
[h)  U  A.C.  Bonibet,  Life  of  Ilaydn,  In  Letters.  Prov.  1820. 12. 
i)  K  Holmes,  LIf*;  &  Gorr.  of  Mozart  New  York.  1845l  12.] 
k)  ( TMbaut,)  Uebcr  Keinholt  Id  d.  Tunknnst  Hcldlb.  (1825. 1826.)  1851. 

t)  Koch«r,  d.  Tonk.  In  d.  K.  Stuttg.  1823.  A.  KZ.  1823.  N.  7.  105.  1S25.  N.  45.— 1S24.  N.  122. 18a& 
N.  «a  60.  1826.  N.  82. 

m)  £7.  KZ.  1844.  N.  51a.  1845.  N.  15. 105. 1851.  N.  48L 


676  MODERN  CHUBCH  BISTORT.    PKS.  YL    A.  D.  1648-188& 

oess  in  the  improveineDts  of  modem  times,  (a)  A  rational  tendency  has  thus 
heen  formed  which  exhibits  a  purely  biblical  literature,  and  withdraws  the 
mind  entirely  from  the  Talmudic  institutes.  In  its  struggles  against  the  old 
Rabbinism  it  has  founded  a  new  Temple  with  a  simple  form  of  public  wor- 
ship in  the  language  of  the  people.  Some  attempts  to  accomplish  a  still 
more  extensive  reform  were  made,  and  it  was  found  that  in  doing  so  either 
the  Mosaic  system  without  circumcision  (to  which,  however,  Ohristian  gor- 
ernments  compelled  the  Jews  to  adhere)  might  be  made  consistent  with  an 
unlimited  progress  in  improvements  (Frankfort,  1840),  or  their  national  dis- 
tinctions might  be  abandoned,  and  they  could  still  adhere  to  the  religious 
character  peculiar  to  Judaism  (Berlin,  1846).  (h)  The  educated  Jews  on  the 
west  of  the  Vistula  have  generally  given  up  their  religious  national  peculiari- 
ties, and  are  not  prevented  by  their  adherence  to  Moses  from  believing  also 
in  Christ.  They  stand  therefore,  with  respect  to  Christianity,  precisely 
where  Moses  Mendelssohn  stood.  It  was  natural  that  persons  in  this  condi- 
tion should  begin  to  demand  a  complete  equality  of  civil  rights.  The  watch- 
word— civil  and  religious  freedom  for  all  the  world !  gained  a  powerful  party 
in  favor  of  such  an  emancipation,  Napoleon  called  a  meeting  of  the  great 
Sanhedrim  (1806),  (c)  and  completed  the  work  of  Jewish  emancipation.  His 
enactments  on  this  subject  have  continued  in  force  until  the  present  time  in 
Holland  and  Belgium.  In  North  America  their  complete  equality  follows 
from  the  essential  nature  of  the  Constitution.  Even  in  Grerman  countries  the 
civil  condition  of  the  Jews  has  been  much  improved  in  various  ways  since 
the  time  of  Joseph  II.,  but  their  complete  equality  with  other  citizens  has 
never  been  conceded  except  for  a  brief  period  while  the  French  were  masters 
of  the  country.  Against  such  an  equality  it  has  been  urged  by  a  party  which 
on  other  subjects  has  shown  a  liberal  spirit,  that  the  Jews  are  still  in  every 
sense  foreigners,  and  therefore  entitled  to  hospitality  but  not  to  the  rights  of 
citizens,  and  that  the  governments  of  the  country  were  founded  upon  Chris- 
tian principles,  which,  if  not  endangered  would  at  least  be  denied  by  the  pro- 
posed concession,  (d)  The  assemblies  of  deputies,  as  far  as  they  were  not  in- 
fluenced by  the  fear  of  the  Jewish  spirit  of  speculation,  were  inclined  to 
concede  to  them  their  full  rights  of  citizenship.  The  Prussian  law  of  1847, 
although  it  commenced  with  the  principle  of  equal  duties  and  equal  rights, 
made  many  exceptions  in  consistency  with  what  were  supposed  to  be  the  de- 
mands of  a  Christian  state,  and  concluded  with  a  special  provision  for  the 
separate  existence  of  a  foreign  nation  in  exclusive  Jewish  conmiunities.  (e) 

a)  J.  Beinemann^  M.  Mondelss.  Li>b.  1881.  SteinhHm,  M.  M.  u.  i.  Schalo.  Uamh.  184a  R  Ausr- 
hach,  d.  Jadenth.  u.  d.  neaeste  Lit.  Stattg.  ISSfi.  [M.  Samuels,  Mem.  of  M.  M.  A  Correep.  with  Lt- 
vater.  Lond.  1827.  8  ed.  a] 

h)  n.  A.  Franodmy  d.  rationale  Jadenth.  BreL  ISIO.  Nethiboth  01am.  Yeigleioh  zw.  d.  modernea 
Jadonth.  n.  d.  Bel  MoeiB  a.  d.  Proph.  (fh)m  the  Kngl)  Frk£  1839.—^.  Frdnkd^  d.  mod.  Jadenth. ;  d. 
FranU  Bef.  a.  d.  neae  Zeit  BeatL  1814— D.  A.  Z.  184d.  N.  41. 

o)  Proofs  verbal  des  stances  de  raasemblee  des  deputes  firanf.  profeaaant  la  reL  JaiTa.  Par.  180& 
Bevae  des  deax  mondes.  1852.  Sept  16. 

d)  PauluM,  die  JQd.  Nationalabsondrang.  Hcidlb.  1881.  On  the  other  side :  Krug,  Henotkoo. 
Entw.  e^  Beligionsgesetzes  t  chrlstl.  8ta&tcn.  Lpit.  1830. 

e)  D.  A.  Z.  ISiT.  N.  16L.  219.  M.  Veit,  d.  Entwurfe.  Verordn.  t  d.  Verb.  d.  Jaden  in  PrtotMii. 
Lpi^  1847.    SUxhl,  d.  christL  Staat  a.  sein  Verb.  z.  Deiamoa  a.  Jadenth.  BrL  1847. 


CHAP.  Via  QENESAL  AFFAIRa    $488.  JEW&    $489.  BLAYBBY.  677 

The  National  Aflsembly  in  St.  Panics  Chnrob,  over  which  on  one  occasion  a 
Jew  presided,  granted  by  an  almost  nnanimons  vote  toM  rights  of  citizenship 
to  the  Jews ;  (/)  bat  the  execntion  of  this  enactment  has  been  almost  nni- 
yersally  prevented  in  the  German  States  by  Ohristians  belonging  to  the  edu- 
cated and  the  ignorant  classes.  (^)  In  England,  Parliament  has  removed  the 
civil  disabilities  of  the  Jews  (since  1829),  bnt  the  oath  of  adherence  to  the 
Christian  faith  required  of  aU  members  of  Parliament  has  prevented  their  ad- 
mission th^re.  And  yet  the  city  of  London  has  repeatedly  chosen  a  Roths- 
child for  its  representative  (since  1847).  The  Lower  House  has  more  than 
once  adopted  Russell's  proposal  to  change  the  form  of  this  oath,  but  the 
Lords  have  hitherto  rejected  it,  on  the  ground  that  the  admission  of  a  Jew 
would  be  an  insult  to  the  Son  of  God,  and  the  commencement  of  an  atheistic 
government  (A)  While  the  rationalist  party  took  no  special  interest  in  the 
work  of  converting  rationalist  Jews,  (t)  the  pietists  entered  upon  it  with  pe- 
culiar zeaL  Societies  of  the  Friends  of  Israel  were  formed  for  this  purpose 
in  England  (1808),  in  America,  and  in  some  of  the  German  cities,  ijc)  The 
result  of  these  efforts  proves  that  aside  from  those  Jews  who  live  in  countries 
not  professedly  Christian,  and  those  who  are  already  seeking  salvation,  and 
therefore  need  instruction  or  protection,  more  may  be  expected  from  the 
power  of  Christian  improvements  in  Europe,  under  the  influence  of  which 
the  Jews  reside,  than  from  any  direct  attempts  at  conversion,  against  which 
they  have  such  prejudices.  The  inhabitants  of  the  Ghetto  in  Rome  were 
compelled  once  more  in  1828  to  listen  every  Sabbath  to  a  sermon  for  their 
conversion.  (J)  In  the  East  the  legend  of  the  middle  ages  with  respect  to 
the  fanatical  use  of  Christian  blood  was  now  revived,  and  used  to  justify 
every  kind  of  cruelty  and  horrible  outrage  against  the  Jews  (1840).  (m) 

§  489.    Abolition  of  Slavery. 

K  Biol,  de  raboUtlon  de  Tesclayagd  sQcien  ea  Occident  Par.  1S40.  Tk.  F.  Suaeton^  d.  tfrik  ScIa- 
veohandel  a.  &  AbhBUb  from  the  EngL  bj  JolloiL  Lpei  184t  [The  AiHoan  Slaye  Trade  and  Its  abet* 
tfon.  Lond.  184L  8.] 

The  Church  has  always  endeavored  to  mitigate  the  evils  of  slavery  (p.  188), 
and  as  soon  as  it  possessed  the  power,  to  restrain  them  by  legal  enactments. 
But  it  was  not  until  some  time  in  the  middle  ages  that  the  last  remnants  of 
European  slavery  were  abolished  by  law.  After  Europe  had  for  three  centu- 
ries gathered  up  the  riches  of  America  by  means  of  the  newly  introduced 
slavery  of  the  African  (p.  888),  the  great  principles  of  universal  liberty  com- 
bined with  those  of  the  gospel  in  demanding  the  emancipation  of  the  negro. 
^*  A  party  of  the  Saints,'*  as  they  were  called  in  derision,  which  had  sprung 

f)  stenograph.  Berieht  lg48.  vol  IIL  p.  17&4aa. 

0)  A.  KZ.  1S51.  N.  119.  BrL  KZ.  lS5i.  N.  88. 

A)  A.  Z.  1884  N.  ISl  184«.  N.  8S1.  (JewUh  DfBabllities  Bill)  D.  A.  Z.  1847.  N.  862. 1849.  N.  167. 

€)  (^FrUdldndsr)  Sendechr.  an  Tellern  von  einlgen  UauBvdtern  jQd.  RoL  BrL  1799.  comp.  Tho- 
lack,  verm.  Schrr.  vol  IL  p.  126. 

it)  Khelnw.  Bep.  vol.  XXIIL  p.  84,  186«l  vol  XXV.  p.  82,  27408.  vol.  XXVIIL  p.  278sa.  Die 
Freande  Isr.  Nachriehten  t.  d.  Ausbr.  d.  Belcbea  O.  Ba&  1841.  S  P.  Gauuen,  d.  Yerk&nd  d.  £▼. 
DSter  d.  Jaden.  fVom  the  French.  Ilamb.  1844. 

/)  A.  KZ.  182a  N.  41.       m)  A.  Z.  l&ia  N.  140i.  k,  othm. 


678  MODEBN  CUUBOH  HI8T0BT.    FEB.  YL    A.  D.  1M8-18B8. 

from  the  Methodistio  movement,  contended  for  a  long  time  almost  hopeleesfy 
in  Parliament  against  the  existence  and  the  necessity  of  slavery  in  the  colo- 
nies. Their  ^eches  awakened  hopes  among  the  slaves,  which,  in  some  in- 
stances led  to  insurrections.  During  one  of  those,  among  the  negroes  of  De- 
marara,  the  passions  of  the  people  hecame  so  inflamed  that  a  missionary 
whose  name  was  Smith  was  condemned,  and  died  in  confinement  (1824) 
hefore  the  king^s  pardon  arrived  from  England.  When  the  tamnlts  among 
the  slaves  of  Jamaica  had  been  quelled,  the  chapels  of  the  Baptists  and  Meth- 
odists on  the  island  were  demolished,  and  the  lives  of  their  preachers  were 
in  peril  because  they  had  preached  that  all  the  children  of  God  were  free,  (a) 
The  abolition  of  the  African  slave  trade  by  political  treaties  (1880)  was  foand 
to  be  entirely  inadequate  to  effect  the  object  at  which  it  aimed,  as  long  as 
slavery  itself  enjoyed  the  protection  of  the  laws,  (b)  After  years  of  prepara- 
tion in  various  ways,  the  English  nation  made  an  offering  of  a  hundred  and 
twenty  miUions  of  dollars  to  indemnify  the  masters,  that  after  a  certain  time 
of  preparation  by  instruction  the  slaves  mi^t  be  introduced  to  the  privileges 
of  citizens,  and  that  all  of  them  might  be  declared  free  in  the  colonies  of 
England  after  the  1st  of  August,  1834.  As  the  slaves  had  become  Christian- 
ized by  such  means  and  by  previous  efforts,  their  emancipation  was  found  to 
be  practicable  and  safe,  (e)  An  Order  was  established  by  the  Abbess  Javohey 
for  the  purchase  of  negroes  in  the  French  colonies  with  a  view  to  educate 
them,  and  thus  prepare  them  for  civil  freedom,  and  its  efforts  have  been  at- 
tended (s.  1888)  with  some  degree  of  success,  (d)  A  society  for  the  extinc- 
tion of  slavery  was  formed  at  Paris  (1885).  The  constitution  of  the  Repub- 
lic of  1848  abolished  all  slavery  on  French  territory,  and  the  National  Assem- 
bly of  1849  decreed  that  all  losses  of  the  owners  of  slaTes  in  consequence  of 
emancipation  should  be  compensated  from  the  public  treasury.  Denmark  de- 
clared that  all  children  of  slaves  bom  after  the  passage  of  the  act  of  manu- 
mission should  be  free,  and  fixed  upon  a  certain  year  (1847)  as  the  definite 
limit  beyond  which  all  slavery  was  to  cease  throughout  its  colonies,  (e)  Id 
the  Southern  portion  of  the  United  States  the  material  interests  which  would 
be  seriously  injured  by  the  abolition  of  slavery^  came  into  violent  collision 
with  the  enthusiasm  which  demanded  that  all  who  hod  been  redeemed  by 
the  blood  of  Christ  should,  at  all  hazards,  be  set  at  liberty.  The  sovereign 
people  began  (1885)  to  hang  those  clergymen  who  preached  against  slavery, 
and  the  negroes  who  listened  to  them,  in  accordance  with  their  own  forms 
of  justice  (Lynch's  law.)  (/)  Gregory  XVI.  having  reviewed  the  decrees  of 
his  predecessors,  condemned  the  trade  in  negroes  as  utterly  inconsistent  ^ritb 
Christianity  (1839) ;  (jgi)  but  instead  of  being  dinunished,  its  horrors  became 
more  dreadful. 


a)  A.  EZ.  18^  N.  9a  £v.  KZ.  1882.  N.  96.       b)  A.Z.  188ft.  N.  148. 
«)  Abaebaffting  d.  Bklav.  Id  d.  Colonien.  (AnalAnd.  1884.  N.  806fla.> 
<0  A.  Z.  1885.  SuppL  N.  1498.       «>  D.  A.  Z.  1847.  N.  8&S. 
/)  A.  Z.  1885.  N.  244.  a)  A.  KZ.  1340.  N.  19. 


CHAP.  yilL    GENERAL  AFFAIBS.    $490.  ST.  SIMON.    800IALI8BC.  679 

§  490.    St.  Simonism  and  Socialism, 

As  civil  liberty  triamphantlj  advanced,  and  tanght  men  that  they  had  an 
eqnal  right  to  the  natural  productions  of  the  soil,  and  as  at  the  same  time 
industry  became  freed  from  its  trammels,  and,  by  the  progress  which  it 
caused  in  the  natural  sciences,  produced  reciprocal  advantages,  the  wealth  of 
the  world  accumulated  in  the  possession  of  the  few,  and  threw  the  masses  of 
society,  on  the  other  hand,  into  a  state  of  the  most  hopeless  want,  (a)  Under 
these  circumstances,  the  idea  arose  with  great  power,  especially  in  the  minds 
of  many  in  France  and  England,  either  by  a  social  revolution  to  introduce 
a  community  and  a  just  distribution  of  goods  (Communism),  or  by  an  organi- 
zation of  labor  into  free  associations  for  trade  and  subsistence,  to  assist  those 
portions  of  society  which  have  been  oppressed,  in  obtaining  a  proper  share 
of  the  enjoyments  and  improvements  which  are  now  exclusively  in  the  pos- 
session of  a  few  (Socialism),  (b)  Christianity  was  found  compatible  with 
such  efforts,  and  even  countenanced  them  to  some  extent,  by  the  aid  of  such 
fiicts  in  its  primitive  period  as  the  compassion  of  Jesus  for  the  poor,  his  indig- 
nation against  the  wealthy,  one  attempt  at  a  community  of  goods,  and  in  the 
history  of  its  orders  and  sects  having  much  to  say  of  a  voluntary  surrender 
of  wealth,  and  a  community  of  goods  in  a  variety  of  forms,  (c)  But  as 
Christianity  was  interwoven  with  all  the  existing  relations  of  society,  and 
Pantheism  had  now  made  the  idea  of  renouncing  the  pleasures  of  this  life 
intolerable,  by  destroying  all  hope  of  another  world.  Communism  has,  in  the 
person  of  its  first  leaders,  who  fell  under  the  guillotine  of  a  merely  poHtioal 
revolution  in  France,  {d)  for  the  most  part  renounced  all  connection  with 
Christianity,  {e)  But  as  the  unavoidable  necessity  of  some  kind  of  religion 
was  perceived,  the  idea  was  adopted  of  making  it  the  basis  of  the  new  order 
of  things.  Accordingly,  in  France,  Count  St,  Simon  gave  to  his  plan  for 
improving  the  condition  of  laborers  by  elevating  industry  to  the  highest  pos- 
sible privileges,  the  name  of  a  religion — a  new  Christianity.  (/)  When  he 
died,  in  consequence  of  an  attempt  at  suicide  (May  19,  1825),  a  single  disciple, 
Olinde  Bodrigues,  stood  by  his  death-bed.  The  new  worldly  gospel  which 
had  been  introduced  in  the  midst  of  the  liberty  and  the  excitements  imme- 
diately following  the  revolution  of  July,  was  proclaimed  by  sermons,  mis- 
sions, and  polemical  treatises  sent  forth  from  Paris.  It  declared  that  Catho- 
licism was  in  its  dotage,  that  Protestantism  was  a  mere  negation,  that  Christ 


a)  Tbe  Claima  of  Labor.  Lond.  1845.    Engeh,  d.  Lsge  d.  arbelt  claaeo  In  Engl  Lps.  1945i 

b)  L.  Stein,  d.  Social  n.  Commnn.  d.  heatlgen  Frankr.  Lps.  1948.  (BlunUchli,)  Die  Commonis- 
Cen  In  d.  Schwdz  nach  d.  b.  Weltling  vorgefund.  Papleren.  Commlaslonsbericht  Z&r.  1344. 

c)  i\  R  ilunde»hag&n,  d.  Ckimmun.  n.  d.  nscetlschc  Soclalreform  lin  Laufe  d.  cbriatl.  Jahrhh. 
(Stad.  n.  Kiit  1&46.  H.  Ss.)  J.  P.  Batnang,  d.  Bedont  d.  Comm.  a.  d.  Geelobtsp.  d.  Chiiatentb.  u.  d. 
BittL  Cultur.  Z&r.  ISil. —Proudhon,  d.  Bonntagsfeler.  a.  d.  Fr.  Satlsb.  1850. 

d)  F.  N.  Baboet^f^  le  tribon  da  people.  Par.  (1795.)  F.  BuonaroUi^  la  conspiration  de  Baboeail 
Brux.  1828. 

a)  (P.  554a.)  Comp.  Generalberleht  an  d.  Staatar.  ▼.  Nenchatel  tL  d.  geb.  dentacbe  Propigandik 
Z&r.  184e.  Ev.  KZ.  184ft.  N.  98. 

/)  Introd.  aox  travaox  Bdentlflqaea  da  19.  S.  Par.  1807.  2  vols.  4  R^orcanlsatlon  de  la  soclAM 
Earop.  Par.  1814.  CatScfaisme  dos  indnfftrtels.  Par.  1S34.  Le  noavean  cbrlatlanUme.  Par.  182& 
(Oeavres  p>.  O.  £odrignea.  Par.  1882.  2  Tolflw    Extracts  In  Baobholz  neuer  Monatschr.  toL  21&  84&) 


680  MODERN  CHUBCH  HISTORY.    PER.  YL    A.  D.  164»-1858L 

had  provided  only  for  the  spiritual  portion  of  our  nature,  and  that  St.  Simon 
was  about  to  reinvest  the  flesh  in  its  rights.  Simonism  became,  on  the  one 
hand,  a  deification  of  the  world,  and  on  the  other,  a  consecration  of  industry 
as  a  series  of  operations  upon  the  divinity  itself.  Its  general  law  was,  that 
after  the  law  of  inheritance  had  been  abolished,  every  individual  should 
receive  from  the  common  stock  in  proportion  to  his  capacity,  and  every 
capacity  according  to  its  works.  This  principle  was  to  be  carried  out  under 
the  direction  of  a  hierarchy,  whose  arbitrary  power  was  concealed  under 
tirades  about  love  and  self-sacrifice,  (g)  Even  noble  minds  were  sometimes 
captivated  by  the  unsparing  manner  in  which  the  evils  of  the  present  state 
of  society  were  laid  bare,  by  the  substitution  of  merit  for  the  accident  of 
birth,  and  the  reinyestiture  of  the  disinherited  son  of  European  society  in 
the  rights  of  a  man.  The  boldest  language  which  this  spirit  of  the  age  ven- 
tured to  use,  was  that  in  which  an  excluidve  attention  to  material  interests 
was  dignified  with  the  name  of  religion.  But  when  En/antin^  one  of  the 
leaders  of  this  party,  a  stately  and  energetic  but  narrow-minded  man,  in  his 
character  of  the  highest  revelation  of  the  Deity,  bestowed  his  principal  atten- 
tions upon  women,  and,  as  their  Messiah,  made  woman  free  by  destroying 
the  restraints  of  marriage,  and  aiming  to  attain  privileges  like  those  of  Mo- 
hammed, a  schism  was  produced  (Nov.,  1881),  and  Rodrigues  proclaimed  that 
Simonism  had  apostatized  from  St.  Simon.  The  saloon  of  the  Simonists  was 
closed  by  order  of  the  government,  and  they  were  themselves  arraigned  be- 
fore the  legal  tribunals  for  propagating  principles  dangerous  to  morality. 
Their  condemnation  (Aug.,  1882)  was  a  convenient  kind  of  martyrdom,  and 
the  supreme  Father  Enfantin  still  continued  the  object  of  a  oonfiding  venera- 
tion to  all  true  believers,  (h)  But  the  public  prominence  which  their  hier- 
archy and  morahty  had  attained,  destroyed  all  public  confidence,  and  their 
monastic  seclusion,  their  costume,  and  their  phraseology  became  a  matter  of 
general  ridicule.  (J)  liohert  Owen  (b.  1772),  a  benevolent  manufacturer  of 
England,  became  convinced,  by  observing  the  poverty  and  unhappiness  of 
those  around  him,  that  man  had  been  conducted  by  the  present  system  of 
civilization  to  the  very  verge  of  an  abyss.  After  vainly  attempting  to  regen- 
erate human  society  on  his  own  possessions  in  England  (since  1800)  and  in 
North  America  (1828),  he  turned  his  attention,  by  means  of  lectures,  tracts, 
and  missionaries,  to  the  neglected  portion  of  the  English  nation.  He  con- 
tended, that  instead  of  standing  in  the  way  of  one  another,  men  should  co- 
operate and  enjoy  the  fruit  of  their  common  toil ;  that  instead  of  the  present 
system  of  unnatural  marriages,  there  should  be  a  free  choice  of  kindred 
spirits ;  and  that  instead  of  families,  there  should  be  congregations.  So  far 
as  our  knowledge  at  present  extends,  we  have  no  certainty  that  the  existence 


g)  Doctrine  de  8t  Sim.  Par.  182S.  ed.  8. 1S81.  vol.  L  Communion  g6n^ral«  de  la  fiunllle  de  St  S. 
Par.  1S31.  J.  Le  Chevalier,  rel.  St  SImonienne.  Enseignement  central.  Par.  1881.  (Zeitachr.  £  hM. 
Th.  vol  I.  Part  2.)  AsMciation  Unlverselle.  Par.  1881. 

h)  U  Cheralier,  sur  la  division.  Par.  1882.    Proc^a  des  8t  8.  Par.  1889. 

{)  Ctirori,  d.  8t  Sim.  u.  d.  nonere  frana.  PhlL  Lps.  1881.  Bretachneidm'^  d.  Bt  S.  o.  d.  Chi1» 
tenth.  LpA.  1H82.  M.  Veit,  St  Simon  n.  d.  St  Slmoniaten.  Lpa.  1881  JTotter,  in  d.  Stud.  a.  KilL 
1883.  P.  1.    Kapf,  in  d.  Tab.  Zeltsch.  1382.  P.  2. 


CHAP.  Yia    GENERAL  AFFAIRS.    $491.  HOLT  ALLIANCE.  681 

of  man  is  protracted  beyond  the  present  life,  and  hence  every  religion  which 
leads  the  mind  beyond  this  world  is  a  delusion.  Men  are  responsible  to  no 
superior  being;  but  should  they  be  placed  from  childhood  in  right  cir- 
cumstances, without  the  perverting  influence  of  poverty  and  ignorance,  tliey 
would  be  animated  by  a  spirit  of  kindness  toward  every  living  thing,  which 
would  render  any  division  of  property  entirely  unnecessary,  (k)  This  scheme 
of  Socialism  found  great  favor  (since  1886)  among  those  who  were  engaged 
in  manufactures.  Simonism  had  been  utterly  ruined  by  the  laughter  of  the 
French  people,  and  it  was  perfectly  safe  for  the  government  to  conflde  the 
rectification  of  Owen^s  theories  to  the  sound  sense  of  the  English  people. 
But  the  dangerous  spirit  of  Oommunism  is  still  undermining  the  foundations 
of  European  civilization,  and  has  not  yet  been  allayed  by  the  higher  authority 
of  the  State,  nor  by  the  benevolent  power  of  Christianity.  (I) 

§  491.     The  Holy  Alliance. 

Krug^  1a  aalnte  AIL  a  Denkmal  d.  h.  Bandes.  Lps.  181ft.  (Gesamm.  Scbrr.  yoL  III.)  Archly  d.  b. 
Bondes.  Munich.  18ia  Notlz  &.  Alex.  Jena.  Vm.  p.  298a.  Eyl^  Frledr.  Wllh.  III.  toL  IL  Abth. 
2.  pi  8480a.— ^.  F,  FUet,  d.  Krieg  a.  d.  Ewige  Friedo.  Lpa.  1840. 

Under  the  influence  of  the  Emperor  Alexander^  then  consoling  himself 
for  his  lost  ideals,  and  seeking  religious  instruction  in  the  society  of  Madame 
de  Ejudener  (p.  595),  {a)  the  princes  of  Europe,  with  the  exception  of  the 
King  of  England,  the  Pope,  and  the  Sultan,  organized  a  Holy  Alliance  (1815), 
that  the  members  of  it  might  become  a  great  Christian  family,  in  which, 
regardless  of  the  various  ecclesiastical  divisions,  the  law  of  Ghristian  love 
might  be  made  the  supreme  law  of  nations.  The  statesmen  of  Europe  smiled 
at  the  strange  language;  the  Uoly  Alliance  in  its  actual  operation,  soon 
turned  out  to  be  very  much  like  other  holy  leagues  of  former  times,  and  it 
finally  dwindled  imperceptibly  away  (since  1880).  Monarchs  belonging  to 
the  three  Churches  of  Christendom  in  1840,  even  conquered  the  Holy  Land 
for  the  Turks.  And  yet  this  ideal  tlms  involuntarily  recognized,  or  in  the 
commotions  of  an  extraordinary  period  rapidly  vanishing,  is  an  everlasting 
truth,  and  a  prophecy  of  a  future  reality.  For  the  accomplishment  of  what 
Henry  IV.  and  Elizabeth  once  had  in  view,  (h)  and  respecting  which  many 
philosophers  have  dreamed,  an  annual  Congress  of  the  friends  of  peace  has 
been  formed  (since  1848),  under  the  influence  of  an  American  association  of 
Quakers  (since  1815).  The  advocates  of  this  movement  declare,  that  the 
welfare  of  Europe  is  sacrificed  to  sustain  the  expense  of  an  armed  peace 
establishment;  tliat  the  principles  of  Christianity  utterly  forbid  war;  and 
that  all  the  disputes  which  arise  between  different  governments,  may  be 

*)  Kv.  KZ.  188».  N.  48.  A.  KZ.  1840.  N.  81.  60.  BrL  KZ.  1S40.  X.  22.  Eheinw.  Eepi  1841.  voU 
XXXII.  p.  17988.  242«s.  {R.  D.  Owen,  Book  of  Uie  Now  Mor.  World.  N.  York.  1S44  New  View 
of  Society.  N.  York.  1825. 12.    Debate  i^ith  Campbell  Cine  ISdO.] 

t)  P.  591.  mndur  (p.  654.)  A.  Vinet,  d.  Social  In  a.  rrinclp.  ftom  the  Fr.  by  Iloftneister,  with 
Vorw.  by  A.  Xeander,  BrL  1&49.  H.  Men,  Armntb  a.  Christenth.  Stnttg.  1M9.  JI.  Amim-Mum- 
berff,  d.  hobern  Bttode  wie  ale  seln  soUten  u.  wie  ale  sind.  BrL  1S51. 

a)  C.  U.  Eynard,  Vie  de  Me.  de  Krudener.  Par.  1849.  2  vols. 

h)  G.  G,  Gervlnus,  ElnL  in  d.  Oeacb.  d.  19.  Jahrh.  Lpa.  1S58.  p.  IMa.  [Introd.  to  tho  Hiat  of  the 
19th  Cent.,  from  the  Germ,  of  QerTlnoa.  Lund.  1858. 12.  p.  16.] 


682  MODERN  CHURCH  HISTORY.    PER.  YL    A.  D.  164S-18&S. 

brought  to  an  amicable  termination  by  the  deoisions  of  arbitrators,  (c)  The 
declamations  of  this  Congress,  and  Elihn's  pipe  of  peace,  have  been  made  the 
subject  of  general  derision,  for  even  Christ  has  brought  a  sword  into  our 
world ;  but  the  gospel,  attended  by  an  advancing  civilization,  holds  up  this 
Peace  of  God,  this  holy  alliance  of  the  nations,  as  the  great  ideal  which  it 
perpetually  strives  to  attain. 


c)  A.  KZ.  1S50.  N.  121.  [E.  Burritt,  Thonghts  and  Things  at  Home  and  Abroad,  with  Llfti,  br 
Mary  Uowltt  Boston.  1853  12.  T,  C.  Vphatn,  Mannal  of  Peace.  N.  r«)rk.  1"^^  8.  C.  Sumner,  The 
Grandcar  of  Nations.  Boston.  1S4T.  (Orat  and  Addroases.  Boat  1850. 12.)  J.  Dymond^  Accordance 
of  War  with  Cbr.  PhUad.  1988. 12.] 


APPENDIX. 


[Some  of  the  first  pages  of  this  translation  were  stereotyped  before  tlie  seventh 
German  edition  was  announced  in  this  country.  The  following  is  nearly  all  the 
additional  matter  in  the  course  of  those  pages,  and  all  which  seemed  of  importance.] 

P.  7,  the  author  says  of  Matthias  Flacius  and  Oaesar  Baronius,  that  they 
*'  were  agreed  in  acknowledging  the  authority  of  the  primitive  Ohurch  and 
its  dogmas,  and  in  regarding  the  history  of  the  Ohnrch  as  a  conflict  between 
Christ  and  Satan ;  but  according  to  Baronius,  Christ,  though  sometimes  slum- 
bering in  his  little  vessel,  has  conducted  it  safely  through  every  storm; 
while,  according  to  Flacius,  Antichrist  has  set  up  his  seat  of  power  in  the 
midst  of  the  Church  itself.'* 

Add  to  the  last  sentence  of  §  11 :  "  The  necessities  of  modem  times  have 
been  provided  for  especially  by  the  graceftd  work  of  Berault  Bemcastel,  (a) 
by  the  compilation  of  Henrion^  (ft)  and  by  Rohrbacher^  (c)  whose  labors  dis- 
play a  considerable  sympathy  with  the  researches  of  German  scholars." 

Near  the  middle  of  p.  10,  Neander  is  said  to  have  given  to  the  pietistio 
school  before  represented  by  Milner,  "  a  scientific  character,  by  uniformly 
referriug  to  the  original  authorities,  by  entering  heartily  into  the  peculiarities 
and  earnestly  developing  the  doctrines  of  past  times,  and  by  giving  promi- 
nence to  long-neglected  representations  of  the  Christian  life,  as  they  were 
variously  exhibited  in  particular  individuals  of  uncommon  talents.  He  dis- 
plays a  confidence  in  Christianity  as  a  divine  leaven,  which  must  gradually 
pervade  all  human  affairs ;  and  though  affectionately  attached  to  the  Church 
as  the  fellowship  of  the  saints,  he  is  tolerant  toward  all  who  oppose  it  on 
merely  doctrinal  grounds,  and  he  clothes  his  descriptions  with  an  ample  and 
devotional,  but  unassuming,  simple,  and  natural  oriental  drapery.  (//)  In  the 
same  spirit,  Jacobi  has  commenced  a  Text-Book,  in  which  general  principles 

a)  Hist  de  Tdglise.  Par.  1773-91. 24  vols.  With  Ck>ntln.  by  PdUr  ds  Laoroix^  RcMaruK  eta 

h)  New  ed.  Hist  eocl  depuis  1a  creation  Juaqn'au  pontifloat  de  Pie  IX«  pablite  par  Migne^  Par. 
1852.  ToL  I.  (To  be  completed  in  25  voia.) 

c)  Htst  Universelle  de  UgX,  Par.  1842-48.  29  Tola. 

<f)  The  6th  toL  of  Neander^a  Hiat  of  the  Chr.  BeL  until  1517,  was  left  in  a  fragmentary  state,  and 
baa  been  ed.  by  £  ^.  T.  Schneidtr^  2  ed.  1-4  vol  1842-47.  [and  haa  been  tranaL  by  7brr«y,  N.  T. 
MBbLy-Hagmbaeh^  Neand.  Yerdlenate  am  d.  KOesch.  (Stud,  il  Krit  185t  H.  8.)  Jaoolbit  x.  Erinn. 
an  Neand.  (Deutaohe  Zeitach.  t  obr.  Wia&  184L  N.  SOaa.) 


684  APPENDIX.    INTBODUCTION.    LTTEBATUBB. 

are  presented  in  an  abstract  classification  of  events,  and  in  isolated  cliarao- 
ters,  and  Schaff  a  more  extended  work,  in  which  he  endeavors  to  give  the 
German  Church  in  America  the  results  of  German  theology."  {a) 

P.  10,  "the  later  editions"  of  Ouericl'e'9  Ohnrch  History  are  said  to  have 
"  gradually  become  a  careful  collection  of  interesting  characteristic  traits  of 
the  piety  of  our  forefathers.  The  revival  of  the  spirit  of  the  various  con- 
flicting creeds  of  former  times,  has  necessarily  had  some  influence  upon  eccle- 
siastical history.  Lindner  has  attempted  to  show  that  the  position  of  the 
Lutheran  Ghurch  is  correct,  by  showing  that  the  law  of  spiritual  life  is  not 
progress,  which  he  regards  as  a  purely  mechanical  and  an  unscientific  idea, 
but  development,  and  has  collected  an  abundant  store  of  materials,  with  not 
much  criticism  or  exactness,  but  with  considerable  moral  judgment  and  pious 
benevolence.  Kurtz^s  School-Book  has  finally  become  a  learned  manual,  in 
which  the  language  and  the  descriptions  are  vigorous,  and  almost  popular ; 
the  Lutheran  is  set  forth,  with  as  much  criticism  as  the  circumstances  allowed, 
as  the  only  true  ecclesiastical  system  of  doctrines ;  and  the  co-operation  or 
resistance  of  men  is  exhibited  in  a  scheme  of  salvation  founded  on  the  merits 
of  the  incarnate  Redeemer  on  the  cross,  and  under  the  fostering  care  of  the 
Holy  Spirit  advancing  to  universal  dominion.  Notwithstanding  the  exclusive 
ecclesiasticism  of  the  two  last-named  writers,  both  founded  their  division 
into  periods  on  the  national  elements  of  the  Graeco-Roman  and  the  Germanic 
civilization,  and  Kurtz  went  so  far  as  to  separate  many  things  which  for  the 
time  at  least  belonged  together.  (J>)  Niedner^  on  the  other  hand,  investigat- 
ing and  philosophizing  with  perfect  freedom,  though  with  obvious  inequality 
in  his  execution,  and  in  a  style  which  is  rather  dry  and  scholastic,  but  with  a 
strictly  logical  connection,  has  collected  a  great  abundance  of  particular 
views.  He  was  followed  by  Frieke^  with  great  designs  and  much  labor 
attempting  to  compose  a  Text-Book,  in  which  Ohurch  History  was  to  be 
delivered  from  those  petty  details  which  are  so  painful  and  even  fatal  to 
many  minds,  and  addressing  himself  to  his  work  with  youthful  ardor,  but  in 
a  peculiar  and  frequently  distorted  style,  and  in  an  unnatural  order  of  logical 
development."  (e) 

At  the  dose  of  §  12,  QfrOrer  is  said  to  have  "pointed  out  the  immense 
importance  of  the  mediaeval  Ghurch  for  the  (German  states." 

Add  to  the  close  of  §  22 :  "  And  yet  the  necessity  of  supernatural  aid, 
and  with  this  a  confidence  in  its  reality,  had  been  vividly  felt  even  in  more 
fortunate  times.  The  unconscious  longhigs  of  the  Roman  people  were  ex- 
pressed by  their  poets  in  hopes  full  of  anxious  forebodings,  and  by  their  his- 
tonans  in  gloomy  presentiments,  {d)    Among  the  oriental  nations,  a  hope 

a)  J.L.  Jacobi,  LB.  d.  KOescb.  BrL  1850.  1  vol  Ull  690.  PhU.  8ehaJ[  Qeaoh.  d  chr.  K.  Von 
ihrer  GrQnd.  b.  a.  d.  Gegenw.  Mercenb.  ISM.  1  vol  Aposi  Zeit  (Intended  to  be  in  9  vols.)  [UiA 
of  the  Apost  Church,  from  the  Germ,  of  P.  Scbafli;  by  R  D.  Yeamans^  N.  York.  ISSS.] 

b)  Bruno  Lindrur,  LB.  d.  chr.  KGesch.  m.  bes.  Beraek&  d.  dojrra.  Entw.  Lpa.  1S4S^S9  t  Abck. 
A  3  Abth.  1.  n.  (till  16iS.)  J.  IT.  Kurta,  (LB  d.  KGesoh.  MleUa.  1819. 1850.)  Ua  d.  tXlg.  KO«eh. 
(as  &  ed.)  Miet  1853. 1  vol  (Intended  to  be  in  2  toIsl  In  4  Abth.) 

c)  a  W.  KiedMr,  Gesch.  d.  chr.  K.  LB.  Lpa.  1346^  P.  O.  A.  Friekf^  LB.  d.  KGoch.  Lpa.  ISMi 
1  vol.  (till  768.) 

d)  Virgil,  Eclog.  IV,  4-10.— 2>.  W.  Bdttichsr,  proph.  Stimmen  a.  Bom.  a  d«a  ChrtetL  In  Taflttoi. 
Hamb.  1840.  8  yola. 


PHUXX    STEPHEN.    PAUL.    JOHN.  685 

then  extensiyely  prevailed  that  salvation  would  come  Arom  the  East,  and 
proceed  in  every  direction  from  Judea,  where  the  fulfilment  was  already 
approaching.  This  expectation,  though  known  to  the  Roman  conrt,  was 
regarded  as  trivial,  and  of  no  political  importance."  (a) 

Add  after  Philo^  p.  21,  line  5th  from  the  hottom:  ^^a  weak  thinker,  hut 
with  an  exalted  moral  and  a  profound  religions  spirit." 

Near  the  middle  of  p.  25,  Stephen  is  said  to  have  heen  **  probahly  a  Hel- 
lenist, whose  ardor  had  rendered  him  prominent  in  the  controversy.  Such  a 
controversy,  however,  shows  that  he  had  broken  through  the  ordinary  bar- 
riers of  the  Ohristianity  of  that  period,  and  portended  the  doom  which  then 
threatened  the  nnbelieving  Jews.  But  the  angelic  aspect  he  exhibited  in 
view  of  death  could  not  save  him,"  &c. 

The  first  sentence  of  §  81  continues :  "  and  from  the  synoptic  gospels  we 
have  reason  to  conclude  that  there  were  some  churches  on  the  shores  of  the 
sea  of  Galilee." 

In  the  sentence  closing  with  '^  (64)  "  p.  29 :  ^^  Paul  did  not  survive  the  per- 
secution under  Nero." 

After  '^  sinAilness,"  on  line  10th,  p.  80 :  ^^  Paul  had  been  brought  involun- 
tarily and  with  violence  to  Christ ;  and  in  the  profound  consciousness  of  the 
utter  nothingness  of  all  creatures  before  Gk>d,  he  believed  that  man's  destiny 
was  arranged  by  an  immutable  decree,  and  it  was  in  this  way  that  he  solved 
the  mystery  of  a  temporary  rejection  of  God's  people,  until  the  Gentiles  shall 
have  entered  the  divine  kingdom." 

Before  ^^  Paul,"  near  the  close  of  §  88 :  "  Yet  the  new  man  is  necessarily 
produced  by  faith,  through  which  the  believer  dies  and  rises  again  with  ^ 
Christ." 

P.  81,  on  line  4th,  instead  of  ^^  Bome,"  read :  *^  the  Roman  Church,  which, 
according  to  the  epistle  to  the  Bomans,  was  founded  neither  by  Peter  nor 
by  Paul." 

On  the  first  line  of  p.  88 :  Paul  "  held  up  to  those  in  Corinth  (1  Cor.  15), 
who  protested  against  the  resurrection,  not  on  the  ground  of  the  old  He- 
brew and  Sadducean,  in  opposition  to  the  Pharisaic  arguments,  but  on  that 
of  inferences  from  Grecian  literature  (Acts  17,  82),  the  simple  fact  that  Christ 
had  actually  risen  from  the  dead ;  and  he  showed  from  his  Pharisaic  position, 
that  an  opposite  opinion  would,  if  consistently  carried  out,  lead  to  the  sensual 
life  of  an  Epicurean."  After  the  close  of  the  section,  it  is  said  that  the  sim- 
ple gospel  *^  naturaUy  developed  itself  in  his  mind,  until  in  contrast  with 
those  various  orders  of  spirits,  he  placed  the  Bedeemer  as  the  Son  of  God, 
who  had  not  only  lived  before,  but  had  actually  created  the  world."  (Ji) 

On  p.  34,  line  8th,  the  conflict  beyond  which  John  appears  in  his  later 
writings  to  have  lived,  is  defined  to  be  that  between  Christianity  and  *^  Juda- 
ism, and  which  seemed  to  him  as  the  great  crisis  of  the  conflict  between 
light  and  darkness  in  the  world,  already  in  the  past." 


a)  Tiicit.  Hist  Y,  1&    Su€i.  Vesi».  a  4.    According  to  Jo»epM  Bell.  Jad.  YI,  0.  4. 

h)  Col.  1, 18-17.  is  only  the  most  pointed  expression  of  the  development  proceeding  bf  means  of 
the  epbtles  to  the  Coloesians,  Ephesians,  and  Phllippiana.  For  their  Pauline  origin :  Reuu^  Oesch. 
d.  H.  Bchriften.  toL  L  p.  lOlsa.  119fli.    Against  it:  Baur^  Paul  p.  417aiL 


686  APPENDIX.    APOSTOUO  OHUBCH. 

§  89  is  rewritten :  *^  The  writings  which  have  come  down  to  ns  from  the 
apostolic  Church,  originated  not  in  a  Ioyc  of  authorship,  hut  from  the  reli- 
gious exigencies  of  the  times.  They  were  circulars  in  which  Paul  continued 
after  death  to  commanicate  with  the  congregations  he  had  estahlished,  recol- 
lectioDS  of  the  earthly  life  of  Jesus,  and  prophetic  glimpses  of  the  end  of  the 
world,  for  the  consolation  of  those  who  were  to  live  in  the  approaching 
troubles  of  the  Church.  An  inclination  toward  the  popular  language  of  the 
Greeks  naturally  followed  when  Christianity  passed  beyond  the  limits  of  the 
Judaism  of  Palestine,  though  an  oriental  coloring  and  a  profounder  religious 
meaning  was  necessarily  imparted  to  many  of  its  words  and  phrases.  Among 
the  epistles  by  an  unknown  hand,  is  that  which  was  addressed  to  the  Hebrewt, 
Its  style  of  thought  is  that  which  prevailed  in  the  Alexandrian  school,  and 
was  adapted  to  Jewish  Christians ;  the  allegorical  mode  of  explaining  the 
Scriptures  is  used  to  show  that  the  whole  temple  service  which  then  existed 
in  its  glory,  was  an  unsatisfactory,  shadowy  form,  whose  rites  needed  to  be 
continually  repeated,  and  had  now  attained  their  true  reality  in  Christ,  the 
everlasting  High  Priest,  and  the  perpetual  sacrifice  for  sin ;  and  saving  &ith 
is  shown  to  be  a  confidence  in  things  unseen,  and  a  development  of  the  divine 
trust  exhibited  in  the  Old  Testament,  (a)  A  sudden  rupture  from  the  living 
spirit  of  former  writings  is  immediately  perceptible  when  we  enter  upon  the 
productions  of  the  apostolic  Epigonoi,  who  lived  until  near  the  middle  of  the 
second  century,  and  were  honored  by  the  Church  as  Apostolic  Fathers.  A 
doctrinal  treatise,  ascribed  to  Barnabas  by  the  Alexandrian  doctors  of  the 
third  century,  has  a  considerable  resemblance  to  the  epistle  to  the  Hebrews, 
though  its  historical  views  appear  to  have  had  no  dependence  upon  the 
canonical  gospels  (Life  of  Jesus,  §  122,  nt.  e).  When  referring,  however,  to 
the  ruins  of  the  temple,  the  author  seems  to  have  regarded  Judaism  not  only 
as  then  rejected  by  God,  but  as  already  broken  when  Moses,  in  anger  at  the 
idolatrous  people,  dashed  in  pieces  the  tables  of  the  law.  He  appears  also  to 
have  looked  upon  the  whole  popular  practice  of  the  ceremonial  law  as  found- 
ed upon  a  misunderstanding  of  the  divine  intention,  according  to  which  it 
was  merely  a  prophetic  image,  whose  particular  parts  are  referred  with  a 
playful  fancy  to  Christ  as  a  new  lawgiver,  and  whose  true  interpretation  con- 
stituted a  complete  gnosis.  Q>)  The  epistle  of  Clement  was  written  in  the 
name  of  the  church  of  Rome  to  the  church  of  Corinth  (80*90),  for  the  pur- 
pose of  effecting,  through  the  influence  of  former  fHendship,  a  reconciliation 
between  the  several  parties  which  had  broken  out  in  the  latter,  and  we  find 
that  it  was  read  as  a  sacred  book  in  the  Corinthian  Church  in  the  second 
century,  {c)  It  contains  no  reference  to  the  Jewish  law,  introduces  many 
notions  then  current  among  the  Greeks,  and  enforces  the  doctrine  of  salva- 
tion through  faith  and  good  works,  (d)    The  Shepherd  also  had  its  origin  in 

a)  After  the  Introdd.  to  the  Commentaries  {ee^  of  D.  Scbols,  Bleek,  Tholack):  T.  A,  8ey0bHkt 
de  Ep.  ad  H.  indole  peealiarL  Lps.  1621.  ffate^  fL  d.  Emj^nger  d.  Br.  an  d.  H.  (Winer's  n.  Enpdh. 
Jonm.  1828.  vol  IL  II.  8.)  BaumgarUn-Crutiua  de  orig.  Ep.  ad  H.  Jen.  1829.  W,  J.  Rink,  ia  d 
Stnd.  a.  Krit  1889.  IL  4 

()  Comp.  UtfeU  in  d.  Tub.  Qoartalsch.  1889.  H.  1. 

c)  Dlonya.  of  Corinth,  in  Eu».  H.  ecc  IV,  28.  C  Irtn,  III,  Z. 

d)  RiUchl,  p.  28268.  against  SchtctgUr,  roL  IL  pi  12688.  Comp.  C  E,  Franeke^  d.  I>hr«  d.  Om. 


CLE\I£NT.    HEBMAS.    EGCLES.  ANGELS.  687 

the  Roman  Church,  (a)  After  the  middle  of  the  second  century,  it  was 
regarded  in  many  congregations  as  a  sacred  writing,  and  from  its  many 
primitive  hut  offensive  references,  we  conclude  that  it  may  belong  to  the 
close  of  the  first  century,  though  ffermas^  the  brother  of  Pius  I.,  Bishop  of 
Rome  (142-167),  was  the  first  who  collected  these  inspired  dreams,  visions 
of  angels,  and  parables  together,  and  gave  them  his  primitive  name  (Rom. 
16,  14).  (b)  It  consists  principally  of  admonitions  to  a  strictly  moral  life, 
and  recognizes  on  this  very  account  the  rights  of  those  who  had  fallen  away, 
but  had  penitently  returned  after  baptism.  In  the  allegorical  form  in  which 
the  Church  is  there  presented,  Christianity  appears  almost  exclusively  as  a 
faith  in  one  God,  and  a  renunciation  of  the  world,  and  Christian  Judaism  as 
a  trust  in  the  meritoriousness  of  works,  and  as  a  mere  theological  form.'* 

After  the  first  sentence  on  p.  89 :  ^^  But  the  seven  stars  of  the  angels  of 
the  churches  of  Asia  Minor,  do  not  designate  the  overseers  of  those  con- 
gregations, but  in  the  style  of  the  inspired  prophets,  the  genii  by  whom 
the  distinct  character  of  each  church  is  supposed  to  be  represented^  like  the 
national  spirits  mentioned  in  Daniel  (ch.  10),  and  hence  they  are  sometimes 
addressed  as  personal  beings,  and  sometimes  as  identical  with  their  respective 
churches."  (c) 

The  second  sentence  on  the  same  page  is  continued  thus:  *^and  were 
ordained  by  the  imposition  of  the  hands  either  of  the  whole  congregation,  or 
of  the  distinguished  teachers  belonging  to  it."  (d) 

After  the  second  sentence  on  p.  40 :  ^^  All  were  full  of  the  expectation 
of  something  supernatural,  and  they  therefore  put  confidence  in  what  claimed 
to  be  manifestations  of  divine  power,  although  no  one  felt  that  he  could  ad- 
vance any  daims  upon  it  for  personal  aid.  Every  natural  talent  according  to 
its  peculiar  nature,"  &c. 

Before  ^^  Fastings,"  middle  of  p.  40 :  '^  even  the  women  took  occasion  to 
lay  aside  those  marks  of  propriety  which  were  then  generally  observed."  (e) 

Before  "  All  hope,"  near  the  close  of  §  43,  the  previous  sentence  con- 
tinues :  '*  the  gospel  had  already  shown  how  it  could  quietly  exalt  society 
above  the  utmost  limits  of  the  ancient  world.  (/)  And  yet  some  admoni- 
tions to  be  obedient  for  conscience'  sake  to  those  who  were  actually  in  au- 
thority, were  not  altogether  superfluous  for  the  new  royal  priesthood,  (ff) 
which  had  no  conception  of  the  labor  and  patience  needful  before  its  true 
historical  development  would  be  attained.    It  is  true  that,"  &o. 


^Zeitsch.  r.  lath.  Th.  184t  H.  8.)  An  eptetle  claiming  to  be  the  2d  of  Clement  was  found  with  the  Ist 
In  the  Codex  Alex.,  bat  la  a  doabtftil  fhigment  of  a  generally  devotional  character. 

o)  Irm.  IV,  a  SchtcegUr,  vol.  IL  p.  828aB.  RiUchly  p.  297881  Xfici^  Einl.  in  d.  Ofll  d.  Joh.  p. 
88788.  (as  belonging  to  the  first  half  of  the  2d  cent) 

h)  Fragm.  de  canone  in  Murai,  Antiqq.  ItaL  vol  IIL  p.  858.  It  maj  after  all  have  been  intended 
onlf  for  a  Montanlfltic  object  (TVrfuJ.  de  pud.  c.  2:  illo  apocrTphos  Pastor  moechorum.)  Comp. 
ThUrach^  d.  K.  im  Ap.  Zeita.  p.  25188. 

c)  Reft,  1,  20.  2, 1.  8. 12.  1&  8,  L  7.  Neither  with  GahUr,  (lap.  1488.)  Agents,  and  at  the  name 
time  personifications  of  the  Churches,  nor  with  Rothe  (p.  428s.),  ordinary  bishops,  but  which  ex- 
isted originally  in  the  plan  of  the  apoetle^  nor  with  TAUrtch  (K.  in  Ap.  Zeita.  p.  278s8.),  superior 
pMtors,  a  Icind  of  bishops.    Comp.  Z)«  Wette,  OfTcnb.  Jo.  p.  41a.        <f)  Acti  «,  fi.  18,  8. 

e)  1  Ow.  11, 1-16. 

/)  Ep.  ad  Philemon,  OoL^^K.        g)  Ram.  18, 1-7.    1  Pet  2,  I8-I61 


688  APPENDIX.    00NFLIGT8  OF  OHBIBTIAKITT. 

In  the  first  sentence  of  §  44 :  "  The  devotional  exerdaes  of  the  Christum 
assemblies,  like  those  of  the  Jewish  synagogaes,  consisted,  in  addition  to  an 
attendance  in  the  chnrch  at  Jerusalem  npon  the  temple  service,  generally  of 
prayers,  singing  of  psalms  and  even  of  the  first  strains  of  the  Christian 
hymns,  (a)  the  reading  of  the  proper  sections  of  the  Old  Testament,  and 
discourses  founded  npon  these."  It  is  also  said,  that  ^^  Apostolic  e|Hst]es 
were  sometimes  exchanged  between  different  congregations  (Col.  4^  158.)," 
and  that  ^^  in  Greek  congregations,  b^tism  was  sometimes  administered  to 
those  who  stood  as  proxies  for  the  dead.  (&)" 

On  p.  45,  after  what  is  said  of  Sept.  Sevems :  *^  but  the  prooess  of  trial 
by  torture,  to  induce  the  accused  to  deny  their  Mth,  which  had  been  author- 
ized by  Tngan,  and  after  the  time  of  Marcus  AureliuB  had  been  practised 
with  increased  severity,  was  strictly  enforced  by  the  courts,  at  least  in 
Africa,  (c)"  After  what  is  said  of  Alex.  Sevems :  *^  and  yet,  in  the  code  of 
laws  which  Ulpian  collected  for  the  use  of  the  proconsuls,  were  indnded  the 
penal  enactments  against  the  Christians.  ((2)" 

On  p.  56,  after  the  first  word  at  the  top :  '*  Thus  the  story  of  the  massa- 
cre of  the  Theban  Legion  in  a  narrow  pass  of  the  YaUais  (287),  was,  accord- 
ing to  its  earliest  traditional  form,  merely  that  of  the  martyrdom  of  Mawri^ 
Uvs^  with  seventy  soldiers,  in  the  East ;  and  the  more  extended  form  of  it 
which  has  since  been  propagated  in  the  West,  was  made  known  near  the 
middle  of  the  fifth  century,  at  the  same  time  with  the  coming  to  St  Maurice 
of  the  sanctuary  of  this  martyr-legion,  with  which  the  local  services  of  the 
different  places  became  connected  in  the  cities  of  the  Lower  Rhine.  («)" 

On  p.  57,  respecting  the  Ap.  Constitutions:  ^^The  7th  and  8th  books 
were  independent  collections,  entirely  revised  with  respect  to  their  language 
in  the  fourth  century,  and  supplied  with  some  later  ecdeeiastical  usages,  but 
not  in  a  sense  specially  favorable  to  the  Arians.  As  a  complete  collection, 
they  have  never  attained  the  authority  of  law,  and  they  have  been  put 
together  variously  in  the  different  national  churches  of  the  Roman  empire. 
In  its  primitive  form,  it  was  especially  the  compilation  of  the  church  of 
Alexandria.  (/)" 

On  p.  68,  ".Choir-leaders  {yfrakrai)  (gy^  are  mentioned  among  the  semi- 
clergy,  and  it  is  added :  "  Widows  and  deaconesses  were  also  appointed  for 
the  service  of  the  church ;  the  latter  as  virgins,  but  yet  distinguished  from 
the  former.  (A)" 


a)  (7o/.  8, 16.  Bph.  6, 10.    Ck)mp.  PUnii  Ep.  X,  96. 
I)  1  Oor.  15,  2». 

c)  Tertul  Apol.  ol  2. 

d)  Doniitlas  Ulp.  de  oflEicio  proconBulia,  libro  YIL    Accordiog  to  Lactant  Instt  Y,  11. 

*)  Theodoret  (about  427.)  Oraecar.  affectt  curat,  dtop.  8.  (Oppi  vol.  IV.  p.  W3.>— VIU  S.  Bomaal 
after  460,  Ac  For  a  solution  of  the  story :  BsWterffs  EOeech.  Deulschl  rol.  L  p.  94aa.  A.  J.  Btn- 
terim^  Kalendariam  Ecc.  Coloniensis  S.  IX.  ad  illustr.  Hist  Ursnlae  et  sodamin  yfrgic  Col  ISU.  4 
O.  llagen's  Ecim-chronik  der  Stadt  Giilln,  ed.  by  Groots^  CoL  1884.  Comp.  RbeinwakTs  Brp. 
1885.  vol  IX.  p.  201fl8w  Hettberg  in  IMd.  p.  IIIbsl  Bcspeoting  Maasa  candid*:  Prudent  Hymn.  UL 
TiUemont,  vol  IV.  p.  ITSas. 

/)  Note  a.  p.  67.  Butufn,  Hlppolytua,  p.  418-627. 

g)  En9.  n.  ecc  VI,  48. 

A)  Cone  Carth,  in  Stotnto  Ecc  Aftic  c  11.  Ck>ntL  app.  YI,  17.  comp.  TertuL  de  poeolt  e.  U 
de  vir^  vol  c  9.    Bunsen^  Utppol  p.  486. 


CALLI8TU8  I.    MARBIAQE.    CUHJASM.  689 

On  p.  69,  after  the  first  sentence  in  §  59:  ^^The  congregation  were 
directed  to  obey  the  bishop  as  Christ,  and  the  presbytery  as  the  apostles,  (a)" 

After  "  interchangeably,"  middle  of  p.  69,  insert :  "  traces  of  the  resist- 
ance of  the  presbyteries  to  the  new  authority  are  discoverable  in  both  centa* 
ries ;  and  this,"  &c. 

On  p.  61,  after  the  words,  "her  subsequent  empire,"  insert :  "Even  a 
swindler  and  a  furtive  slave  snatched  from  suicide,  was  able,  after  seeking  by 
violent  means  a  martyr^s  death,  to  obtain  complete  control  over  Zephyrinus, 
a  Bishop  of  Rome,  but  unacquainted  with  ecclesiastical  laws,  and  to  become 
his  successor,  Callistus  L  (219 — about  224).  He  was  disposed  to  grant  par- 
dons for  all  kinds  of  sins,  and  gave  ofience  to  his  opponents  in  the  presbytery, 
by  asserting  that  a  bishop  could  never  be  deposed  by  a  presbytery,  nor  be 
compelled  to  resign  his  office,  though  guilty  of  a  deadly  sin.  (5)" 

On  p.  68,  aft»r  "  Luke " :  "  but  the  laws  of  the  Church  were  not  yet 
agreed  with  regard  to  the  exclusion  of  women  at  certain  seasons  from  public 
worship,  in  accordance  with  the  requirements  of  the  Old  Testament,  (c)" — 
After  "  severest  penances" :  "  Adultery  was  the  only  ground  on  which  mar- 
riage could  become  void ;  death  alone  could  sunder  the  nuptial  bond^  and  a 
second  marriage  was  called  a  decent  adultery.  ((2)" 

The  following  is  added  at  the  dose  of  §  68 :  "  But  the  sacrifice  of  all 
earthly  joys,  which  the  whole  Church  looked  upon  as  indispensable  to  its 
true  ideal  of  religion,  found  ample  compensation  in  the  belief  in  a  millennial 
kingdom,  founded  upon  a  perverted  notion  of  the  Messiah  revealed  by  tradi- 
tion, and  the  Revelations  of  John,  (e)  This  kingdom,  which  the  returning 
Christ  would  establish  after  the  subversion  of  the  Roman  empire,  and  the 
brief  dominion  of  the  Antichrist  whom  they  regarded  as  the  returning  matri- 
cide, was  to  be  earthly,  according  to  its  essential  nature,  but  its  images  of 
sensuous  pleasure  were  also  symbols  of  religious  bliss.  The  faithful  who 
died  before  the  fulfilment  of  these  hopes,  were  consoled  with  the  prospect 
that  they  should  be  raised  again  to  participate  in  the  glories  of  this  kingdom. 
Such  was  the  faith  of  the  whole  Church,  (/)  until  the  common  ecclesiastical 
doctrine  became  suspicious  on  account  of  the  extravagances  of  a  party  (§  67), 
and  it  was  opposed  by  the  school  which  contended  that  none  but  spiritual 
blessings  were  of  any  importance  (§  85).  And  yet  this  old  and  popular  faith 
of  the  Church  was  never  surrendered  to  individual  enthusiasts,  until,  instead 
of  the  vainly  expected  and  sudden  overthrow  of  heathenism  by  a  miraculous 
advent  of  Christ,  the  Church  experienced  for  a  long  period  the  historical 
power  of  Christianity,  and  the  clergy  at  least  beheld  the  dawn  of  the  earthly 
kingdom.  (^)" 


a)  IgnaL  ad  TraU.  a  18L  ad  BmTrn.  e.  8L 

h)  {Orig.)  Pbiloeophmnena  &  Haerea.  BeAit  ed.  MiUer,  L  IX  pi  284aib 

e)  In  favor  of  them :  JHonyi,  Alex,  Ep.  canon.  (R<nUKy  Rellq.  saer.  voL  IL  jf,  892.)    Agalnil 
them :  ContiU.  app.  YI,  27a. 

d)  Aihenag.  Deprecat  ol  28.    On  the  other  aide  stUl,  Hsrmae  Pastor  II,  mand.  4, 4 
4)  Rw.  20.   Irefi,  Y,  88.  8. 

f)  Papku :  Eu9,  H.  ecc  III,  89.    JMan.  c  Tryph.  c  80.    Iren.  V,  828. 

g)  iCorrodf)  Krit  Oeach.  d.  Cblllasm.  (Frki:  d.  Lpz.  ITSln.)  Z&r.  1791 4  vola.    ifflfiMlUr,  hliL 
XDtimrl  d.  U  T.  tonaen^).  Releh  In  d.  8  entea  Jhh.  (Henke^b  ICag.  toL  YL  Pt  8.) 

44 


690  APPENDIX.    ANCIENT  CHUBCH. 

Beginning  of  §  66 :  "  Candidates  for  admission  to  the  Church  x<^''lX^ 
IA€vol\  from  the  number  of  whom  all  persons  connected  with  any  employment 
in  the  heathen  temples  or  the  theatres  were  exdnded,  («)'' — After  "  pro- 
tracted to  the  end  of  life,"  insert :  "  Near  the  end  of  the  third  century,  fixed 
forms  of  penance  were  devised,  as  steps  by  which  offenders  might  return  to 
the  full  comm anion  of  the  Church." 

Before  the  last  sentence  in  §  66,  insert :  ^^  though  many  rigid  persons 
established  the  conviction  in  some  congregations,  that  the  Church  could 
admit  of  no  penance  or  pardon  for  particular  sins,  or  at  least  for  their  repe- 
tition.   Among  these  were  included  those  sins  which  were  called  mortal.  (()" 

On  p.  67,  the  title  of  §  68  is  altered  so  as  to  read :  ^*  The  Novatian  and 
Meletian  Schisms  " ;  and  before  the  last  sentence  in  the  section :  ^^  About  the 
same  time  a  schism  was  created  in  Egypt  in  consequence  of  the  ambition  of 
Meletius^  Bishop  of  Lycopolis.  This  man  had  been  a  confessor  in  the  time 
of  the  Dioclesian  persecution,  and  now  raised  the  watchword  that  the  pen- 
ances to  be  imposed  upon  those  who  had  fallen  ought  not  to  be  determined 
until  a  period  of  tranquillity.  He  interfered  with  the  hitherto  undefined  pre- 
rogatives •f  the  Metropolitan  of  Alexandria,  by  consecrating,  in  the  place  of 
many  living  priests,  a  large  number  of  others  whose  salaries  could  not  be  ob- 
tained without  the  establishment  of  an  opposition  Church.  The  bishops  of 
this  new  Charch  were  recognized  at  Nicaca  as  the  future  successors  of  those 
of  the  legitimate  party ;  but  as  they  took  part,  to  a  considerable  extent,  with 
the  defeated  party  in  the  council,  they  shared  also  in  its  subversion.  Some 
remnants  of  them,  however,  were  found  as  late  as  the  fifth  century." 

References  for  §  69 : 

**  Xeander,  CL  Yeranlass.  u.  Bcschaffenb.  d.  &lt  Passahstreltigkelten.  (KHist  Arch.  ISSXL  Pt  1) 
Bettbsrff,  die  Puchastreit  (Zeltsch.  f.  hbt  Th.  I$d2.  vol.  IL  Pt  2.)  Gietder,  in  d.  Stad.  n.  Krlt 
1888.  II.  A.—SchiDfgler,  Montan.  p.  1918a.  Baur,  kan.  £vv.  p.  8340a.— X  L.  WeUael^  die  Paasahfeler 
d.  eraten  Jbh.  Pfurzli.  1848.  (On  the  other  aide :  Baur,  in  d.  Tb.  Jahrbb.  184S.  IL  2.  HUgei^dd^ 
Ibid.  1349.  H.  2.)    Ibid.  z.  Passahfeier  d.  alL  K.  (Stud.  a.  Krit  1848.  H.  4r 

The  sentences  (p.  68,  line  6)  on  the  Paschal  Controversy  are  altered  thus: 
"  In  Asia  Minor,  the  saving  Passover  (tt.  (rcDr^ptoy,  arovpcoo-t/xov)  was  kept  with 
a  love-feast,  as  a  festival  of  rejoicing  for  the  accomplishment  of  the  work  of  re- 
demption, at  the  close  of  the  great  fast  on  the  evening  of  the  fourteenth  of  Niaan. 
In  other  parts  of  the  Church,  the  Resurrection  of  our  Lord  (tr.  dvacrrdcriftov) 
was  celebrated  on  the  Sunday  after  tlie  full  moon  in  the  spring,  and  the  pre- 
ceding week  of  the  fast  was  observed  as  a  representation  of  the  Passion-week. 
When  Poly  carp  visited  Rome  (about  160),  this  difference  in  reckoning  was 
discussed,  thoagh  without  injury  to  Christian  unity.  But  the  Roman  bishop, 
Victor^  attempted  to  excommunicate  the  Asiatic  congregations  as  heretics 
(196),  for  their  course  in  this  matter.  Public  opinion  was  in  favor  of  the 
Roman  usage  with  respect  to  this  festival,  but  it  oould  not  sustain  the  violent 
measures  of  the  Roman  bishop  against  those  who  differed  firom  him  only 
upon  a  ritual  observance.  Polycrates,  in  behalf  of  the  Asiatic  bishops,  ap- 
pealed, as  Polycarp  had  done,  to  the  example  of  John,  who  had  observed  the 

a)  QmstUL  app.  Till,  82.    Oomp.  Si^ntm^  Hippoljt  voL  L  p;  4M. 

h)  Eerm,  Pastor  IL  numd.  4, 1.    T&rtuk  de  padia  a  U.    Cbnc,  BUUriL  e.  U  T.  Mdi 


PASCHAL  OOin'KOYEBST.    WOKSHIP.    BAPTISM.  691 

Passover  in  their  way  among  them  and  their  ancestors,  (a)  Bat  in  Laodioea 
and  the  country  around  it,  the  churches  continued  to  eat  the  paschal  lamh  in 
the  Jewish  manner,  as  a  type  of  Christ^s  sacrifice.  A  remonstrance  against 
this  was  presented  (about  170)  from  Alexandria,  from  Borne,  and  even  from 
Asia  Minor,  on  the  ground  that  it  was  inconsistent  with  the  whole  represen- 
tation of  John  in  his  gospel,  in  which  Christ  was  never  said  to  have  par- 
taken of  the  paschal  supper  according  to  the  law,  because  he  was  himself  the 
true  Lamb  of  God.  (h)  The  Boman  usage  finally  prevailed  in  the  third  cen- 
tury, and  even  then  those  who  contended,  though  in  ignorance,  that  this 
festival  should  be  kept  according  to  the  Jewish  law,  were  spoken  of  in  Borne 
among  the  heretics,  (c)  But  there  were  still  some  deviations,  in  difierent 
parts  of  the  Ohurch,  from  the  general  usage  of  reckoning  the  Easter  Sunday 
from  the  course  of  the  moon,  (d)    The  fifty  days,''  &o. 

Near  the  close  of  §  70,  instead  of  the  ^^  cock  and  anchor :"  ^^  and  the  palm ; 
symbols  taken  principally  from  the  Old  Testament,  but  of  typical  import. 
From  the  use  of  these  in  their  houses,  Christians  were  led  to  use  them  in 
ornamenting  their  tombs;  and  as  works  of  art  in  fresco  or  mosaic,  they 
were  gradually  introduced  from  the  catacombs  into  the  churches.  But 
even,"  &c. 

Instead  of  the  first  sentence  of  §  71 :  ^^  On  the  basis  of  the  apostolic  wor- 
ship, and  under  the  influence  of  obscure  recollections  of  the  services  of  the 
temple  on  Zion,  a  solemn  form  of  worship  was  gradually  introduced,  though 
some  peculiarities  prevailed  in  the  difierent  metropolitan  districts  which  pre- 
vented entire  uniformity  in  its  details,  (e)  Prophetic  and  apostolic  writings, 
in  the  most  extensive  sense  of  these  words,  and  the  acts  of  the  martyrs,  dif- 
ferent according  to  local  usage  and  interest,  were  read  in  the  public  assem- 
blies. The  homilies  which  followed  were  delivered  principally  by  the  bishop 
alone ;  they  were  in  the  East  constructed  and  uttered  in  a  rhetorical  style, 
and  they  were  therefore,  even  in  the  third  century,  extemporized  by  those 
whose  peculiar  talents  fitted  them  for  such  an  exercise.  The  songs  in  honor 
of  Christ  as  a  God,  in  which  the  oldest  hymns  that  have  reached  us  were 
nsed,  had  a  resemblance  to  the  Pindaric  odes,  and  show  an  Alexandrian 
spirit  (/)" 

In  the  same  section,  the  bread  and  wine  presented  by  believers  are  called 
"  ohlationes ;"  "  the  consecrated  bread  taken  home  by  them,  or  sent  to  the 
absent,  was  eaten  every  morning  before  any  thing  else ; "  {g)  "  baptism  was  ad- 
ministered usually  by  immersion  three  times,  to  the  sick  by  sprinkling  (B. 
clinicorum),  with  reference  to  the  death  of  our  Lord,  and  in  the  name  of  the 
Father,  the  Son,  and  the  Holy  Ghost ; "  ^*  anointing  (xp7afia)^  as  well  as  impo- 

a)  Sum.  II.  ecc  Y,  23-25.     Ttrtul.  de  praeacr.  (Append.)  c  69,    Socrai.  H.  ecc  T,  21. 

b)  Em.  n.  ecc.  IV,  20.    Ckronicon  patch,  ed.  Dindorf,  toL  I.  p.  128&  (Mellto,  Bp.  of  Sardei, 
Clemens  Alex.,  Ap<)Ulnaris  Bp.  of  Uierapolis,  IIlppoljtoA.) 

e)  {Orig.)  HaeresL  Refat  p.  274«a. 
d)  F.  Ptper,  Qesch.  d.  Ostcrfcstes.  Bri.  1845. 

€)  ConMUL  opp.  YIIL    Cooap.  the  Alexandrian  view  according  to  T^UanCt  repreaontatioii  in 
Bunnen^  Hlppol.  p.  49Aw, 

f)  Clem.  Paed.  Ill,  12.     {CUm.  Hymn,  in  Salr.  ed.  Plpw,  Odtt  1885.)    Uebeni  b.  JKSniir, 
Sinnb.  u.  Kunstvont  p.  Ite 

g)  Tertul  ad  oxor.  II,  5.  oomp.  ^im#M,  HippoL  p.  601 


692  APPENDIX.    ANCIENT  OHUSOH, 

gition  of  hands,  was  the  consammation  of  baptism ;  and  e(mfirmatum  (oon- 
signatio)  became  finally  a  distinct  rite.^' 

P.  71,  instead  of  the  sentence  commencing  with  "Justin'^:  ^^The 
memorabilia  of  the  apostles,  quoted  by  Justin,  correspond  essentially  with 
the  history  given  in  the  synoptic  gospels.  Bat  some  deviations  from  it  can- 
not be  folly  explained  by  allowing  that  they  were  written  from  an  indepen- 
dent recollection.  They  rather  imply  that  he  could  not  have  made  use  of 
these  synoptic  gospels,  but  that  he  must  have  had  besides  them,  or  instead 
of  them,  such  a  revision  as  was  in  use  among  the  Jewish  Ohristians,  like  the 
Gospel  of  the  Hebrews,  or  the  Grospol  of  Peter,  (a)" 

After  the  ninth  line  on  p.  78  :  ^^  In  these  respects  they  entirely  correspond 
with  the  Martyr- Acts  of  Ignatius,  (b)  The  feelings  of  humility  and  of  self- 
respect,  as  well  as  the  desire  to  die,  shown  in  them,  were  very  possible  in  a 
character  highly  esteemed  in  the  age  in  which  the  martyr  lived,  and  the 
abuse  of  the  soldiers,  and  his  free  intercourse  with  his  friends,  were  consisteBt 
with  the  Boman  laws  on  imprisonment.  But  not  only  have  we  indubitable 
evidence  that  the  more  extensive  text  has  been  revised,  (e)  and  that  other 
epistles  have  been  added  to  the  original  seven,  but  even  the  shorter  text  dis- 
covered again  in  the  seventeenth  century,  has  not  proved  to  be  perfectly 
genuine,  (d)  The  newly-discovered  Syriac  translation  of  three  epistles,  in  the 
briefest  and  the  rather  less  hierarchic  text,  produces  the  impression  that  it 
can  be  only  an  extract,  (e)  But  if  even  the  germ  of  these  epistles  should 
prove  to  be  spurious,  and  not  essentially  the  same  with  the  fundamental  ideas 
in  the  more  extended  work  we  now  have,  they  would  still  be  an  important 
document  of  the  middle  of  the  second  century.  (/)  The  Epistle  of  Polyearp 
to  the  Philippians  is  a  modest  admonition  to  morality,  was  written  with 
reference  to  the  actual  circumstances  of  their  Church,  makes  several  allusions 
to  Paul,  and  is  pervaded  by  the  same  spirit  as  the  first  epistle  of  John,  and 
the  pastoral  epistles.  The  obvious  reference  to  Ignatius  is  probably  of  a 
later  origin,  {g)    Papias^''^  &c. 

The  title  of  §  74  is  changed  into  ^^Apocryphal  Literature.'^    References  are : 


a)  Note  b.  p.  71.  SemUch,  d.  api>.  Denkw.  d.  Just  Goth.  1&19.  JTilffer{feld,  krit  UntenL  fl.  d. 
Sty.  Jnst,  d.  Clem.  HomUien.  vu  Jdarcion's.  HaL  1850. 

b)  (After  the  editt  of  the  Patree  app.)  Corpus  Ignatianain  bj  WilL  Cureton,  Lood.  1S49.  I^oattl 
quae  feruntur  Epp.  cum  ct)uBd.  martTrio,  coll.  editt  graecis,  Tereionibnaq.  syriaca,  armeiL,  laL  reo.  / 
K  PeUrmann^  Lps.  1849.    M.  J.  Wochsr^  d.  Brr.  d.  h.  Ign.  fibers,  n.  erkl&rt  Tab.  1829. 

c)  On  the  other  hand  only  paradoxicallj :  JT.  Meier^  d.  dopp.  Beo.  d.  Brr.  d.  Ign.  (Stud.  n.  Krft. 
1888.  H.  &) 

d)  Against  the  genaineness :  J.  DaUaeut,  Baur,  J.E.C.  Schmidt,  (abridged  in  his  KGeech.)  and 
ilTtfte,  (as  referred  to  in  Note  a.  p.  78.)  SchtotgUr,  nachap.  Zelta.  toL  IL  p.  ISOasi  (respecting  t 
Pauline  as  a  counterpoise  to  the  Petrine  Clementlnee  in  Bome  after  the  middle  of  the  Sd  cent) 
For  the  genuineness :  Pearson,  Tom,  Rothe,  Jffuther,  and  Dilu*«rdi«c3t,  (as  referred  to  in  Note  & 
^7&) 

€)  Note  &.  p.  78.  C.  E,  J.  BunMn,  Ign.  n.  s.  Zeit  7  Bendsch.  an  Neander.  Die  8  Kcbten  v.  4 
nnfichten  Brr.  d.  Ign.  limb.  1847.  4  On  the  other  side :  Baw,  Die  Ign.  Brr.  a.  Ihr  neoester  Kri- 
tiker.  Tub.  1848.— Z?:  Dervtinger,  ^.  d.  Aechth.  d.  bish.  Textes  d.  Ign.  Brr.  Wfinb.  1849.  0. 
Uhlhom,  d.  Yerh.  d.  sjr.  Beo.  d.  Ign.  Brr.  i.  d.  kfirtzem  griech.  (Zeitsch.  t  hist  Th.  1801.  H.  t) 

/)  iPolycarpi,  £p.  c  18.)  Iren.  Y,  28.  Orig.  in  Luc.  Horn.  ft.  (voL  IIL  p.  988.)  Aml  H.  •« 
III,  86. 

g)  Note  a  p.  78.  For  the  genuineness,  with  the  exoeptiMi  of  interpolations  (but  more  Tiforav 
than  Dallaeos  and  Bonsen) :  JHUchl,  altkath.  K  p^  804«. 


GNOSTICISM.    SATUBNINUS.    OPHITE&  693 

**  MoMhsim^  d«  canali  rappositt  Ubror.  inter  Chrtott  (Dfl&  ad  H.  eco.  roL  L  p^  2178&)  Lttek4, 
ElnL  in  d.  Offenb.  Job.  ed.  8.  184a  p.  6666.  Htuu,  Ge6cb.  d.  H.  Schriften  N.  T.  ed.  2.  Abtb.  I. 
p.  28566.'' 

Add  to  §  74 :  "  Commencing  with  the  written  controversy  with  heathen- 
ism (§  52),  this  kind  of  ecclesiastical  literatnre  was  now  developed  in  a  con- 
troversy with  the  heretics,  and  penetrated  deeply  not  only  the  sense  of  the 
Scriptures,  hut  the  spirit  of  the  Chnrch  itself.  It  is  divided  into  three 
schools,  according  to  local  traditions,  hnt  in  consequence  of  the  intercourse 
which  then  prevailed  in  the  Church,  these  traditions  were  very  extensively 
diffused." 

Ref.  §  75 :  Sehliemann  is  to  be  corrected  with  respect  to  Ebionism,  by, 

"^  BUicfd,  Altkath.  K.  p.  1026S.** 

After  ^  apostate  "  (^m^  17),  p.  75 :  *'  According  to  Roman  accounts,  they 
trusted  to  the  law  for  justification,  as  they  believed  that  Christ  was  justified, 
and  became  the  Messiah  by  completely  fulfilling  it  (a) 

On  Gnosticism  (p.  76),  after  the  reference  to  Ritter : 

FT.  Bo§sdy  Oesch.  d.  Untoreach.  1L  d.  Gnoet  (Tb.  Bchrr.  cingcC  r.  Neander.  Bii  1847.  vol  I. 

In  the  first  sentence  of  §  76  (p.  76),  after  "  infinite  " :  "  and  indeed  re- 
specting the  origin  and  development  of  thcf  divine  existence '' ;  and  at  the 
close  of  the  same  sentence :  ^^  which  combined  all  the  speculations  and  fan- 
cies of  earlier  and  contemporaneous  philosophies,  and  endeavored  to  pene- 
trate all  the  mysteries  of  the  divine,  as  well  as  of  human  history.** 

P.  77,  Saturninus  is  said  to  have  had  "a  special  relation  to  Menander," 
and  to  have  held,  that  "Satan  was  the  original  ruler  over  matter  (iJXi;)"; 
that  the  seven  planetary  spirits,  "  with  the  view  of  founding  a  kingdom  for 
themselves,  wrested  from  Satan*s  kingdom  the  materials  of  the  present  uni- 
verse,** and  that  "  the  God  of  the  Jews  put  himself  at  the  head  of  the  plan- 
etary spirits,  and  to  assist  them,  raised  up  a  series  of  prophets.  But  as  their 
God  could  not  prevail  against  the  demoniac  powers,  one  of  the  highest 
Aeons  {yovi\  as  Christ  in  the  semblance  of  a  body,  came  to  redeem  the  supe- 
rior human  race  from  the  power  of  Satan,  as  well  as  of  the  planetary  spirits. 
To  effect  this,  he  gave  them  the  Gnosis  and  the  Law,  which  directed  them  to 
abstain  from  every  thing  by  which  men  became  subject  to  matter.  The  fol- 
lowers," Ac. 

§  78,  on  the  Hellenistic  Gnostics,  commences  thus:  "1)  The  Ophitei 
CSaaaarjvoi)  constituted  the  transition  from  the  Oriental  to  the  Hellenistic 
Gnostics.  They  originated  probably  in  Phrygia  before  the  time  of  Christ, 
and  called  themselves  simply  Gnostics ;  but  in  Egypt  they  adopted  Christian 
notions,  though  they  always  remained  openly  hostile  to  Judaism.  They  pro- 
fessed to  believe  that  the  Son  of  Man  emanated  from  the  Original  Source 
Ovdof ),  in  which  the  male  and  female  powers  were  combined,  and  that  the 
Mother  of  Life  (irpfv^ia  ayiov)  sprung  from  him  and  his  parent.  From  her 
connection  with  the  former  original  types  of  humanity,  Christ  was  born,  and 
from  the  excess  of  light  then  sent  forth,  was  produced  Sophia^  i,  f.,  the  prin- 


a)  iOrig.)  lUerea.  B«rdt  p.  257. 


694  APPENDIX.    ANCIENT  CUUSCH. 

oiple  of  redemption  and  of  creation.  When  Sophia,  the  imperfect  and 
adventitious  offspring  of  this  connection,  aspired  to  he  like  God,  she  plunged 
into  chaos,  and  gave  hirth  to  Jaldahaoth^  i.  «.,  the  son  of  chaos.  This  heing, 
that  he  might  create  a  special  kingdom  for  himself,  hronght  forth  the  seven 
planetary  spirits ;  and  when  these  also  aimed  at  independence,  in  great  rage 
he  threw  himself  into  the  slime  from  which  the  universe  was  formed,  and 
the  outward  image  of  his  wrath  hecame  quickened  into  the  serpent-spirit 
(o^to/xopc^oy).  To  supply  the  planetary  spirits  with  employment^  he,  with 
their  assistance,  formed  man  in  his  own  image ;  and  after  Sophia  had  given 
inspiration  to  this  work  of  his  hands,  he  animated  it  with  his  own  spirit  to 
have  dominion  over  divine  things.  But  in  this  process  he  had  parted  with 
his  highest  powers,  and  now  saw  with  terror  that  his  creature  was  superior 
to  himself.  To  prevent  man  from  hecoming  conscious  of  these  exalted  pow- 
ers, he  conmianded  him  not  to  eat  of  the  tree  of  knowledge.  Sophia,  having 
been  brought  by  the  apostasy  of  her  offspring  to  repentance  for  her  faulty 
and  to  a  consciousness  of  her  divine  nature,  now  endeavors  to  attract  to  her- 
self and  to  purify  the  spiritual  light -power  in  the  world  created  by  Jalda- 
baoth.  Availing  herself  of  the  enmity  of  the  serpent-spirit  against  its 
parent)  she  induces  man  to  transgress  the  prohibition  respecting  the  tree  of 
knowledge.  Hence,  what  is  called  a  Fall  in  the  books  of  the  God  of  the 
Jews,  was  in  fact  a  transition  to  a  higher  mental  state.  In  great  wrath  the 
Creator  of  the  world  now  throws  men  down  to  the  lowest  material  world, 
and  harasses  them  with  all  the  pains  and  temptations  incident  to  matter,  but 
reserves  a  chosen  people  for  his  own  special  possession.  Individual  persona, 
endowed  with  high  intellectual  powers,  are  raised  up  by  Sophia,  but  she 
vainly  strives  to  free  them  from  their  bonds^  until  the  Aeon  Christ  unites 
himself  with  the  Messiah  sent  by  the  Creator  of  the  world,  and  brings  to 
men  the  saving  knowledge  of  the  true  God.  Jaldabaoth  had  his  own  Mes- 
siah crucified,  that  he  might  thus  destroy  the  superior  being  connected  with 
him,  but  who  had  previously  departed.  In  the  end,  Sophia,  with  her  pneu- 
matic followers  among  men,  will  be  led  back  to  the  blissful  fellowship  of 
God;  and  the  God  of  the  Jews,  deprived  of  the  light  of  all  the  pneu- 
matic powers,  will  gradually  sink  into  the  abyss  of  annihilation.  The  ser- 
pent)"  &c. 

^^  2)  BasilideH  of  Alexandria  (120-180)  completed,  and  at  the  same  time 
transcended  the  Gnosticism  which  professed  to  be  an  esoteric  doctriae  pre- 
served by  Matthias.  The  Ineffable  (t6  apprjTov)^  the  Deity  who  exists  not 
merely  for  time  (6  ovk  itp  dcof),  has  the  germ  of  every  thing  in  himself,  and 
gives  existence  to  every  thing  not  by  emanatk)n  (npoPokff^  but  as  Jehovah 
does  to  the  light.  In  this  germ  of  the  universe  {navtnrtpyila  rod  Koafwv)  ex- 
isted a  threefold  sonship  {vIottjs  Tpi4i€pris)y  which  the  Original  Being  produces 
by  the  attractive  power  of  his  beauty.  The  first  mounts  directly  up  to  him- 
self,  and  constitutes  the  happy  world  of  spirit  (frXi7p<ii>fia) ;  the  second  forms 
the  confines  of  this  heaven,  and  is  represented  by  the  Holy  Ghost  {to  fif^6pu» 
irvfvpa) ;  and  the  third  remains  in  the  original  germ  of  the  universe,  and 
needs  purification.  From  this  last  sprung  the  first  and  the  second  ruler  of  the 
world  (a/)xa)v),  each  of  whom,  in  accordance  with  the  decree  of  the  Original 


QN08TICIBM.    BA8ILIDE8.    YALENTINU8.  695 

Being,  gave  birth  to  a  saperior  son.  The  first  of  these  created  for  himself 
the  upper,  and  the  last  the  lower  planetary  heaven.  From  the  germs  of  these 
was  developed  the  lowest  world  with  the  race  of  man.  Until  the  time  of 
Moses,  this  was  the  kingdom  of  the  lower  Archon.  But  Moses  made  known 
to  it  the  higher  Archon,  by  whom  the  prophets  were  commissioned.  The 
great  Archon  supposed  himself  to  be  God ;  but  when  tlirough  his  Son  he 
received  the  gospel  from  the  Holy  Ghost,  he  reverently  submitted  himself  to 
its  revelations.  Hence,  in  duo  time,  the  son  of  Mary  in  this  lower  world  was 
enlightened  by  the  gospel,  and  his  nature  was  purified  from  all  worldly  ele- 
ments by  the  necessary  process  of  his  sufferings.  Accordingly,  these  elements 
were  left  on  earth  ;  his  physical  part  remained  at  his  ascension  in  the  plan- 
etary heaven,  and  his  pneumatic  part  ascended  to  the  pleroma  as  the  type  of 
all  the  redeemed.  In  the  end,  when  all  who  are  susceptible  shall  have 
attained  their  destiny,  this  lower  world  will  be  again  covered  with  ignorance, 
and  all  things  will  be  confirmed  in  the  permanent  state  of  existence  for 
which  they  are  naturally  fitted.  This  Roman  account,  (a)  founded  upon  the 
writings  of  Basilides  and  his  son  Isidore,  and  confirmed  by  the  fact  that  they 
used  the  term  faith  to  designate  the  reception  of  salvation,  and  yet  maintained 
the  necessity  of  the  redemption  of  that  which  is  divine  from  a  nature  originally 
alienated  from  God,  seems  to  imply  that  the  materials  of  the  universe  are 
independent.  The  revelation  of  the  Original  Being  in  865  kingdoms  of 
spirits,  according  to  astronomical  relations  indicated  by  the  mystic  watch- 
word Abraxas  (or  dfipaa-a^),  may  find  a  sufficient  place  in  the  doctrine  of  the 
threefold  sonship,  but  in  other  accounts  was  looked  upon  as  an  emanation 
from  the  Original  Being,  or  a  gradual  deterioration  of  his  essence,  until  the 
seven  angels  of  the  lowest  spiritual  worid,  with  the  Archon,  the  God  of  the 
Jews,  at  their  head,  created  the  world  from  the  materials  which  they  found, 
and  furnished  their  men  with  all  kinds  of  worldly  powers,  and  with  such 
spiritual  powers  as  they  themselves  possessed.  To  efiect  the  deliverance  of 
this  spiritual  power  from  its  connection  with  matter,  the  first- bom  celestial 
power  (vovs)  united  himself  with  Jesus  at  his  baptism.  Though  this  Jesus 
was  a  perfect  man,  he  needed  an  atonement  for  himself,  and  it  was  he  alone 
who  suffered  and  died.  In  this  manner,  it  is  possible  that  even  the  Basi- 
lid^ans  adopted  the  peculiarities  of  Gnosticism,  and,  especially  in  the  West, 
carried  the  idea  of  freedom  from  the  law  so  far  that  it  amounted  to  moral 
indifference,  ascribed  to  the  Bedeemer  only  the  semblance  of  a  body,  and 
hence  may  have  regarded  a  denial  of  him  as  of  no  importance.  In  this  state 
of  elevation  above  all  positive  religious  forms,  they  maintained  an  existence 
until  late  in  the  fourth  century." 

"  3)  ValeiUinus^^'*  &c.  The  scheme  of  Valentine  is  said  to  be  (p.  78)  "  a 
lofty  religion  of  the  spirit,  founded  on  the  religion  of  nature  professed  among 
the  heathen." 

After  the  word  '*  events "  (line  5,  p.  79) :  '^  in  an  ascending  scale  of 
forms,  possessing  a  material,  psychical,  and  pneumatic  nature,  in  accordance 
with  this  mingling  of  infiuences,  and  the  variable  moods  of  the  Sophia." 

a)  naer.  Refut  p.  225-844.— B«eil.  philosophi  ^ostici  seateDti«e  ex  HippoL  libru  iUnstr.  ed.  J. 
L.  Jacobiy  Begiom.  1852. 


696  APPENDIX.    ANCIENT  GHUBOH. 

After  the  word  ^^  oentary,*'  tenth  line  from  the  foot  of  p.  79,  continae  the 
sentence :  *^  divided  into  an  Oriental  and  an  Italian  school.  The  former  held 
that  the  body  of  the  Saviour  was  pneumatic,  because  the  H0I7  Ghost  over- 
shadowed Mary ;  the  latter  contended  that  it  must  have  been  psychical,  sinoo 
the  higher  principle  did  not  come  upon  him  until  his  baptism.  According  to 
t)ie  Roman  account,  (a)  Heracleon  and  Ptolemaeus  belonged  to  the  latter 
school,  and  ascribed  to  external  works  no  other  importance  than  that  of 
sensibly  expressing  our  spiritual  unity  with  Christ.  The  gospel  of  John  has 
been  very  seriously  and  piously  explained  by  Heracleon,  who  ftdly  believed 
that  it  corresponded  with  his  views,  and  sometimes  his  interpretation  is  sim- 
pler than  that  of  Origen.  (b)  Ptolemaeus  is  said  to  have  regarded  the  Aeons 
which  Valentine,"  &c. 

P.  80,  after  the  first  line :  ^^  Finally,  Marcus^  who  boasted  that  he  had 
given  a  proper  direction  to  this  school,  has  indeed  enlarged  the  nnmber  of 
Aeons  by  poetical  allegories  and  a  literal  application  of  Pythagorean  num- 
bers, and  has  described  the  universe  as  an  utterance  of  the  Ineffable,  or  a 
gradual  decadence  of  the  divine  essence ;  but  the  gorgeous  ^stem  of  the 
Marcoeian  worship,  with  its  twofold  baptism,  its  change  of  wine  into  blood, 
and  its  attractions  for  women  of  eminent  talents,  gave  occasion  to  scandal 
about  philters,  magic,  and  juggling,  {ey^ 

4)  "  Garpoerates^^''  &c.  After,  "  The  same  was  true  of,"  (line  5,  p.  81) : 
insert :  "  the  son  of  Joseph,  who  carried  with  him  in  a  pure  state  through  all 
earthly  things,  the  recollections  of  what  he  had  witnessed  in  a  superior 
state,  and  overthrew  the  law  of  the  mundane  ^irits." 

Additional  references  to  §  79 : 

**  4)  TertuL  adv.  Hermogenem.  Haerea.  Beftit  pt.  STSa.  Thsodoret,  Baa.  flkbb.  I,  19l  oomp.  Ami 
IL  ecc.  IV,  24— (7.  Bothmer^  Herm.  Africanoa.  Saod.  1882.'' 

The  sentence  (p.  81,  last  line)  ending  with  "  concealed,"  continues:  "  in  a 
body  not  formed  of  earthly  materials,  but  fitted  for  activity  and  suffering 
among  men.  (cQ" 

Note  dy  p.  79,  reads : 

**  They  are  the  principal  topic  of  Iren,  (I,  \m.  II,  1.  Haer.  Reftit  177-94)  and  of  Tm-iuL  (adv.  Yai- 
•Dtinianos),  bat  the  representatioii  which  they  give  was  even  then  that  of  Ptolemaena.  Some  par> 
tlculan  in  Clement  Orig.  in  Jo.  torn.  18.  Epiph.  Haer.  81s.  Munter^  Odae  gnosticac,  thebaico  et 
lat  Uafh.  1812.  The  Coptic  MS.  Sophia,  preserved  in  the  Brit  Masenm  as  a  trans,  of  the  loat  prin- 
dpal  treatise  cX  Valentine  (Sat  fee.  M.  O.  SchtDane^  ed.  Peterfnann^  Ber.  18S1.)  is  an  nnimportast 
later  production  of  the  Marcoeian  party.— ZT.  Rbaael^  d.  System  Tal.  (Th.  Sehrr.  p.  250n.y 

At  the  close  of  §  79,  add :  "  4)  ITermogenes  of  Oarthage  (about  200)  came 
upon  Gnostic  ground,  only  when  he  taught  that  the  Deity  in  creation  acted 
upon  the  wild  chaotic  mass  from  which  the  world  was  made,  and  which  was 
like  himself,  eternal,  as  it  were  with  the  power  of  beauty,  and  thus  formed 
from  it  the  natural  world  and  mankind  ;  and  that  even  deformed  and  wicked 

a)  Beftit  Haer.  p.  19&.       h)  Extracts  in  OHg.  torn.  In  Ev.  Ja  oomp.  Epiph,  baer.  88. 

c)  rren.  I,  18-21.  Haer.  Beflit  p.  200.  (Scarcely  any  thing  but  Extracts  from  Iren.)  Epipk 
baer.  84L 

d)  The  Roman  account  (Haer.  Reftit  p.  258s.)  is  oonftised,  since  the  doctrine  of  a  later  Mardooite 
named  Prepon^  according  to  which  the  Kodeetncr  himself,  as  the  Mediator  between  the  good  sad 
evil  principle,  wa5  only  riglitcous,  is  made  to  imply  a  change  of  views  in  Marcion  bloisall  Comfi 
the  correct  derivation  fk-om  Cordun.  (Ibid  p.  259.) 


HEBMOOENES.    EBIONITEa    IBENAEUS.      •  697 

things  now  enter  into  the  nniversal  system  as  a  resisting  remnant  (fiKotrfiov)^ 
but  will,  aft«r  the  development  of  all  which  is  capable  of  improvement^  sink 
back  into  chaotic  nothingness.  Tertulllan  vented  his  wrath  against  Hermo- 
genes  by  an  attack  npon  the  imitative  arts,  and  all  liberal  culture  in  the 
Church." 

§  80  is  entitled  ^^  Gnostic  Ebionites,"  &c. 

About  the  middle  of  p.  84,  the  sentence  beginning,  "  The  Homilies,"  may 
read :  ^^  The  Homilies  were  never  the  creed  of  the  Roman  Church,  but  were 
composed  or  revised  in  Rome  about  the  middle  of  the  second  century,  to 
reconcile  the  Jewish  Christianity,  which  was  not  yet  denounced,  but  was  de- 
clining there,  with"  &c.  (a) 

P.  86,  8th  line,  after  ^'  baptism,"  read :  "  and  in  addition  to  this,  highly 
commended  circumcision  to  Jews  by  birth." 

At  the  close  of  §  80,  add :  ^^  At  the  conmiencement  of  the  third  century, 
a  book  of  this  sect  was  brought  from  Syria  to  Rome,  which  claimed  to  have 
come  from  the  hand  of  a  gigantic  angel.  It  required  circumcision,  but  of- 
fered pardon  for  even  the  most  unnatural  sins  on  a  second  baptism,  and  was 
rejected  by  the  Roman  Presbytery,  (b)  Origen  knew  of  this  party  even  in  bis 
day,  and  speaks  of  their  selection  from  the  law  and  the  gospel,  their  book 
which  fell  from  heaven,  and  of  their  new  forgiveness  of  sins,  (c)" 

P.  85,  last  line,  after  "  appreciated,"  read :  ^^  but  the  fantastic  nature  of 
their  dogmas,  their  partial  adoption  of  pagan  notions,  their  high-wrought, 
or,  sometimes  on  the  contrary,  variable  system  of  morals,  and  the  position 
which  they  endeavored  to  maintain  in  the  Church,  {d)  or  at  least  their  ordi- 
nary connection  with  Catholic  Christianity,  render  a  judgment  respecting 
them  at  the  present  day  on  various  accounts,  a  matter  of  difficulty,  (e)^' 

§  83  is  entitled — "  I.  The  Asiatic-Roman  School,"  and  reads  :  "  A  Chris- 
tian theology  was  produced  especially  in  the  controversy  with  the  Gnostics, 
in  which  an  attempt  was  made  to  adhere  to  the  historical  basis  of  Christian- 
ity as  the  common  property  of  all,  and  to  apprehend  its  practical  relations  in 
a  scientific  manner.  While  therefore  philosophy  was  recognized,  true  Chris- 
tianity was  looked  upon  as  consisting  in  the  writings  and  traditions  which 
had  been  preserved  from  the  apostolic  times,  and  those  things  which  were 
intelligible  to  the  common  people.  Irenaeus  was  the  principal  agent  in  intro- 
ducing this  school  to  the  West.  He  was  a  disciple  of  Poly  carp,  and  in  conse- 
quence of  the  intercourse  between  Asia  and  the  congregation:}  recently  estab- 
lished upon  the  Rhone  he  became  a  presbyter  in  Lyons.  During  his  absence 
on  a  mission  to  the  Roman  bishop,  Eleutherns,  to  effect  an  accommodation 
with  the  Montanists  (177),  he  escaped  the  massacre  under  Marcus  Aurelius.  (/) 
The  same  year,  however,  he  became  the  successor  of  Pothinus,  the  martyr- 

a)  Acconling  to  the  genaine  epbtle  of  Clement,  the  Pastor  of  Hennas,  and  the  writings  of  Jiu- 
Un  in  opposition  on  tlie  one  hand,  to  ScfiweffUr^  nachap.  Zeita.  voU  L  p.  402sb.  and  on  tiie  other  to 
Domer,  L.  v.  d.  Person  Chr.  vol.  I.  p.  156.  Comp^  BiUchl,  altkath.  K.  p.  2538iL  UUgenfeld,  £yr. 
JuBtins.  p.  220. 

I)  Ilaer.  Refiit  p.  292». 

c)  In  Eu*.  II.  eoc.  VI,  88. 

<0  Comp.  %  79.     Tertul.  c  Yalent  c  A. 

0)  £.  g.  VopiHcm^  Vita  Saturaini  c  2.  Just  ApoL  L  o.  2ft.      /)  K\t9,  H.  mc.  Y,  i. 


698  APPENDIX    ANCIENT  CHUBCH. 

bishop  of  ninety  years  of  age,  and  soon  restored  the  agitated  congregation  to 
its  former  prosperity.  The  only  proof  of  his  own  martyrdom  (about  202) 
consists  in  some  remembrances  or  wishes  which  existed  at  a  much  later  period 
in  the  Frankish  Chm*ch.  (a)  The  recollections  of  his  yonth  went  back  nearly, 
if  not  quite,  to  apostolic  times,  (h)  and  he  was  therefore  strenuously  opposed 
to  Gnostic  speculations  and  all  attempts  to  explore  the  abyss  of  Deity,  (e) 
His  confidence  in  the  writings  of  John  was  no  less  than  his  familiarity  with 
them,  and  we  therefore  find  him  using  the  most  glowing  imagery  of  Asiatic 
tradition,  and  maintaining  that  the  Iloly  Spirit  was  still  ponred  out  upon  the 
Ohurch,  (d)  and  that  the  millennial  kingdom  was  near  at  hand,  (e  )  He  was 
practically  inclined  to  nothing  in  Montanism  but  the  moral  earnestness  which 
he  found  in  it^  and  though  he  rebuked  the  assumptions  of  the  Roman  bishop, 
he  was  accustomed  in  the  spirit  of  peace,  and  in  opposition  to  those  who 
would  rend  the  glorious  body  of  Ohrist  on  account  of  a  mere  difference  in 
the  mode  of  apprehending  Christian  truth,  (/)  to  point  the  whole  West  to 
the  Roman  see  (§  62,  nt.  <»,  §  69,  nt.  b).  His  writings  were  to  his  people  as  if 
composed  in  a  foreign  land,  and  consequently  were  but  little  known  among 
them ;  with  respect  to  their  peculiar  meaning  they  soon  became  to  a  consider- 
able extent  foreign  to  the  whole  Church,  and  the  principal  part  of  them  were 
therefore  at  an  early  period  lost,  (g)  The  Roman  presbyter,  CaUis^  in  an  elo- 
quent dialogue  with  Proclus,  the  principal  advocate  of  Montanism  at  Rome, 
presents  us  with  a  good  representation  of  that  system,  and  the  arguments 
urged  against  it  (202-18).  (A)  With  the  moderate  feelings  of  a  Roman  con- 
versant with  the  trophies  of  apostolic  martyrdoms,  this  distinguished  presbj- 
ter  presumes  to  reject  not  only  the  Phrygian  prophecies  but  the  notion  of  an 
earthly  millennial  kingdom,  the  authorship  of  which  he  transfers  from  an 
apostle  to  a  heretic,  (i)  Jlippolytus^  who  calls  himself  a  disciple  of  I^enaelu^ 
has  left  some  allegorical  explanations  principally  of  the  Old  Testament,  and 
some  works  against  heretics,  which  were  regarded  as  very  valuable,  (i)  The 
nature  and  style  of  these  writings,  as  far  as  the  titles  and  fragments  we  have, 
afford  us  the  means  of  judgment,  (?)  the  general  acquaintance  with  them 
which  the  Syrian  Church  possessed,  (m)  and  the  veneration  as  a  martyr 
which  was  given  him  at  Antioch,  indicate  that  he  resided  in  Asia,  but  his 
statue  found  near  Rome  in  the  old  Tiburtine  street  (1551)  with  a  catalogae 
of  his  writings  and  the  Easter-cycle  engraved  upon  his  cathedra,  (n)  and  a 

a)  Greg.  Turon.  H.  ecc  Franc.  I,  29. 

b)  Ep.  ad  Florlnum :  Eus.  II.  ecc  V,  20.        c)  Irtn.  II,  28.  «. 
d)  Ibid.  Ill,  11.  9.        e)  Ibid.  V,  25-36.       /)  Ibid.  IV,  88.  fi. 

q)  Note  b,  p.  8S.  L.  Duncker^  d.  h.  Iren.  CbristuI  ini  ZusainmeDb.  m.  dessen  theoL  a.  anthn>p. 
Grundl.  GotU  1S4H. 

h)  EtM.  U.  ecc.  II,  25.  VI,  20. 

i)  This  sense  of  Eus.  H.  ecc.  II,  23  can  no  longer  be  dispnted,  since  the  account  of  l)i4>nv!4os 
Alex,  lias  been  compared  with  it 

ib)  Phot.  cod.  121.  Easebius  (H.  ecc.  VI,  22  oomp.  28.)  thooght  that  the  period  of  bis  lit«>nu7  ac- 
tivity was  only  Just  before  that  of  Origen,  and  from  this  Jerome  (Catal.  c  61.)  baa  inf«*rred  that  bt 
exerted  a  direct  influence  upon  the  latter. 

t)  8.  Hipp.  0pp.  ed.  J.  A.  Fabrlciut,  Hamb.  1T16-18.  2  vols,  t    OaUandii  BlbL  vol  IL 

fit)  Ebedjesu  in  Afuiemani  BibL  or.  vol.  Ill  P.  1. 

fi)  Note  0*,  p.  96.  A  horrible  engraving  of  it  is  given  in  Fabric  vol.  L  p.  Stt,  but  a  better  Utbo- 
graph  is  before  Bansen*^  [Hippolytus  and  his  age,  new  ed.  Lond.  1851  2  roU.  W.  K.  Taplor^  Hip* 
poL  A  the  Cbr.  Cburch  of  the  8d  cent  Lond.  1858. 1&] 


ASIATIC-ROMAN  SCHOOL    HIPP0LYTU8.  699 

Roman  festival  in  which  a  great  annoal  feast  was  observed  by  the  people  to 
his  honor  in  the  fonrth  century,  imply  that  he  mnst  have  resided  in  a  Roman 
territory.  Not  only  does  the  most  ancient  testimony  favor  this  Western  resi- 
dence, but  it  would  seem  that  the  Portus  Romanus  mentioned  as  his  see  can 
be  no  other  than  the  Roman  harbor  opposite  Ostia.  (a)  As  he  was  one  of 
the  most  distinguished  astronomers  of  his  day  he  made  the  first  calculation 
of  Easter  for  the  West,  (b)  As  was  naturally  to  be  expected,  the  tradition 
from  Irenaeus  through  the  Roman  clergy,  if  not  a  moral  sympathy  with  the 
Montanistic  tendency,  produced  in  such  a  man  a  strong  partiality  for  the 
Revelation  by  John,  and  for  a  kingdom  of  Ohrist  at  the  second  advent,  though 
the  time  for  it  was  placed  far  in  the  future,  (c)  The  work  against  all  here- 
sies found  in  1842  on  Mount  Athos  (d)^  has  been  partially  and  arbitrarily 
abridged,  and  many  passages  in  it  have  been  in  various  ways  corrupted.  As 
the  first  book  had  long  been  known  under  the  name  of  the  Pholosophumena 
of  Origen,  the  whole  work  was  published  under  the  same  name,  («)  but  it 
bears  unquestionable  evidence  of  having  been  composed  by  some  distinguislied 
member  of  the  Roman  Presbytery  under  Zephyrinus  and  his  successors.  (/) 
The  representation  of  the  82  heresies  is  to  some  extent  literally  borrowed 
from  Irenaeus,  with  the  omission  merely  of  declamatory  expressions,  but  it  is 
also  enlarged  by  accounts  from  original  documents.  The  heresies  themselves 
are  traced  to  the  philosophy  of  the  Greeks,  to  the  systems  of  magic,  and  to 
the  ancient  mysteries ;  they  are  assigned  to  these  philosophical  schools  in  a 
rather  violent  manner,  and  these  schools  are  described  so  as  to  favor  such  a 
division.  The  whole  is  pervaded  by  moral  seriousness  in  contrast  witli  an 
easy  submission  to  Oallistus,  the  Roman  bishop,  who  is  described  as  the 
patron  of  all  heretics  (§  62).  The  authorship  of  it  must  be  referred  to  either 
Caius  or  Hippolytus,  and  as  it  contains  nothing  which  reminds  us  of  the  po% 
lemics  of  the  first ;  as  the  writer  acknowledges  himself  the  author  of  a 
work  on  the  Universe,  (g)  which  on  the  cathedra  is  ascribed  to  Hippolytus, 
and  as  no  witnesses  speak  of  a  treatise  against  all  heresies  except  by  him,  (A) 

a)  Peter,  the  MetropoHtan  of  Alexandria  aboat  806,  ia  the  Prooemiam  of  the  Chron.  pascbale  p.  12 : 
iwiffKoiros  n6pTov  rrKrifrioy  rris  'P<&/irit.  K  J.  KlmmeL,  de  Ulpp.  vlt«  et  acrlpUa.  Jen.  1S89.  P.  I. 
L.  F.  W.  Seineckf,  Lebon  u.  Schrr.  d.  II.  (Zeitsch  t  btet  Th.  1S42.  II.  8.)  On  tbo  other  hand  :  since 
Ls  Moyns  has  written  much  In  flivor  of  Portus  Eom.  In  Arabia,  now  Aden ;  C.  F.  Haenell  (de 
Uipp.  Gott  18S4  4.)  is  in  fltvor  of  Botira^  In  consequence  of  a  misunderatandlng  of  wo-airrwt 
in  Eu*.  H.  ecc.  VI,  20.    Comp.  Dom&r^  Lehre  v.  d.  Person  Chr.  L  p.  60488. 

li)  Canon  pa8cba]i^  a  cycle  of  16  years  seven  times  repeated  (h>m  the  year  822,  In  the  treatise 

c)  On  the  Cathedra:  *tic\p  toO  kcptA  *\ttiuvn\v  worff^\io\)  koI  &ro«caXi^(w^  Perhaps alwi : 
n«pl  x^^^^y^^"^^^  inroffT.  vapdiotriSt  belongs  here.  Tltpi  *A»Tixpl<rrau  Is  preserved  in :  FahHc. 
vol.  L  p.  4s8.    In  EbfdJMu :  Kt^aXina  irphs  Tatoy. 

d)  In  the  context  regularly :  6  Kark  watr&y  alp«(rt»y  i\4yxos. 

<•)  OrigenU  Philosopbumena  8.  omnium  Haeresium  Befhtatio.  E.  ood.  Parisino  ed.  Emmanuel 
Afilier,  Oxon.  18M.  The  1st  Book  is  from  the  works  of  Orig^  the  2d  &  3d  are  wanting,  and  the  lOtb 
is  without  the  conclusion. 

/)  Prooem.  p.  a  1.  IX.  p.  279.  295.  289. 

g)  p.  884:  Utpl  rrjs  rod  worr^T  ohalas.  Photins  alone  mentions  Calus  as  the  writer,  on  the 
authority  of  a  gloes  uncertain  to  himself. 

h)  Eus.  II.  ecc  VI,  22.  Ilpot  airdaas  riis  alpictiSy  In  like  manner  Jerome;  on  the  cathedra  It 
was  perhaps  Intentionally  omitted. 


700  APPENDIX.    ANCIENT  CHT7B0H. 

the  question  mnst  be  decided  in  his  favor,  (a)  The  earlier  or  even  contem- 
poraneous see  of  a  neighboring  bishop  within  the  boands  of  the  Roman  pres- 
bytery is  consistent  with,  and  explains  the  more  recent  ecclesiastical  order. 
As  Hippolytofl  on  the  one  hand  refers  the  Roman  opponents  of  the  essential 
divinity  of  Christ  to  the  authority  of  the  Holy  Ghost  in  the  Scriptures,  and 
replies  to  their  objection  that  this  doctrine  was  an  innovation,  by  appealing 
to  well-established  Roman  traditions ;  (b)  so,  on  the  other  hand,  he  announced 
the  mysteries  of  Christ^s  human  Godhead  in  lofty  parables,  in  opposition  to 
those  who  exalted  this  divine  nature  until  the  pre-existent  personality  of 
Christ  was  destroyed,  (e)  Prudentius  has  sung  (d)  the  martyrdom  of  an  Hip- 
polytus,  whom  he  calls  a  much  esteemed  Novatian  presbyter,  and  who,  in 
prospect  of  death,  returned  to  the  Catholic  Church,  and  says  that  after  his 
execution  near  the  mouth  of  the  Hber,  his  remains  were  conveyed  to  the 
Roman  catacombs,  and  that  afterwards  a  stately  chapel  was  erected  to  him 
on  the  spot  where  his  statue  had  been  found.  Hippolytus  could  hardly  have 
lived  to  witness  the  Novatian  schism,  and  the  last  historical  notice  of  him 
mentions  his  transportation  with  the  Roman  bishop  to  Sardinia,  where  con- 
demned persons  were  doomed  to  die  (236)  ;  (e)  but  it  is  very  possible  that 
this  member  of  the  Roman  clergy  who  was  so  learned  in  the  Scriptures,  and 
who  was  so  unsparing  in  his  treatment  of  a  Roman  .bishop,  asserted  princi- 
ples which  were  afterwards  called  Novatian,  and  was  therefore  regarded  as 
belonging  to  that  schism,  and  yet  that  his  reputation  in  the  congregation  at 
Rome  as  an  author  and  a  martyr  was  Justified  by  th^  legend  of  his  return  to 
the  Church.  Julius  A/ricanus  also  appears  to  have  had  an  Asiatic  educa- 
tion, to  have  resided  and  been  highly  esteemed  in  the  ancient  JBmmaus  (Nioo- 
polis),  and  to  have  been  a  friend  of  Origen,  though  more  advanced  in  age  (d. 
about  232).  lie  attempted  to  harmonize  the  history  of  the  world  as  given  in 
the  Scriptures,  especially  in  its  chronology,  with  the  researches  of  Greek 
writers,  and  from  his  epistles  he  appears  to  have  been  a  liberal  critic  of  the 
sacred  history,  and  yet  to  have  defended  its  essential  facts  against  the  attacks 
of  still  bolder  assailants.  (/)  In  this  tendency  we  perceive  the  germs  of  a 
new  school  of  Scriptural  learning." 

The  next  section  is  entitled — "  II.  The  Roman  African  School,"  and  com- 
mences thus :  ^^  The  only  literature  which  the  Latin  Church  possessed,"  &q. 


a)  J.  L.  JacoM  in  the  Deatsch.  Zeitsch.  t  cbr.  Wise.  1851.  N.  25«.  B.  C.  J.  B»n»en,  Hipp.  n.  a. 
Zelt  Lpfl.  1853.  vol.  I.  On  the  other  band  in  fevor  of  Gains :  FasO^r  in  the  Tub.  th.  Qoartalseh.  1S53. 
pi  299s&    Baur  in  the  tb.  Jahrbb.  1853.  IL  1. 

h)  In  the  fiiKpht  \a^i>pivbo%  {^Kara  rr^s  *Apr4tiMyos  cdp4<rfwt  Aiyoi)  which  the  writer  of 
the  treatise  on  the  Universe  (nt  ff,  last  p.)  qnotes  as  his  own  work,  and  ftom  which  the  passages  io 
Bm.  H.  ccc.  y,  28.  are  probably  taken.  Comp.  TTisod.  Haer.  &bb.  II,  6l  yioeph,  H.  ecc  IV,  21.  Oo 
the  other  hand :  Pfiot.  cod.  48.  as  the  work  of  Caius. 

c)  Tlpbs  NoTiTov.    (Fabric  vol.  II.  p.  Ssa.)       d)  Peristeph.  hym.  11. 

«)  In  the  Catalogns  Liberianns  of  821,  and  in  the  Liber  pontlflcalis ;  see  its  newly  discovered  text 
in  Bunson,  p.  15(>Sw  The  tuit  that  some  one  of  the  name  of  Ilippolytns  bore  a  mesaaga  nr  epistkt 
firom  Dionysius  of  Alex,  is  the  only  reason  for  supposing  that  his  life  was  protracted  longer. 

/)  XP^^^P*"^^^^  irtyrt  ffirov^dfffiaTa  (preserved  only  in  Eosebins^  chronideX  *Eir(0T.  9*fA 
rris  icard  lovadvvav  IffropiaSt  with  an  apologetical  answer  in  Origen.  *Erf<rr.  irphs  * ApiirrtihiWt 
Harmony  of  the  Genealogies  of  Jesoa.  Bm,  H.  eco.  I,  7.  YI,  81.  Ifi^r.  Cat.  c  63.  BotMy  B/A\q, 
Mcr.  vol.  IL 


BOMAN-AFBIOAN  SCHOOL.    TESTULLIAIT.    CYPBIAN.  701 

After  *'  Rome,"  4th  line  from  the  foot  of  p.  88 :  "  was  amply  educated  in 
Greek  general  learning," — and  it  is  said :  ^^  his  wit  was  sometimes  yezy  natu- 
ral bnt  sometimes  far-fetched," — and  ^*  he  supplied  the  African  Church  with 
the  watch-word  that  Ohrist  calls  himself  the  truth,  not  usage."  (a) 

The  11th  line  on  p.  89  continues  thus :  ^^  The  Montanistic  spirit  is  percep- 
tible in  them  all,  but  in  the  earliest  of  them  it  holds  up  the  simple  noble  na- 
ture of  Christian  morality  in  opposition  merely  to  an  effeminate  form  of  civi- 
lization, gradnaUy  it  proceeds  to  still  severer  demands,  and  shows  an  increas- 
ing consciousness  of  its  pneumatic  nature  in  opposition  to  those  who  were 
merely  psychical  Ohristians,  (h)  and  finally  it  was  especially  hostile  to  the 
Romish  Ohuroh,  in  proportion  as  the  latter  ceased  to  favor  Montanism.  For 
it  was  not  so  much  TertuUian  as  the  Roman  bishop  who  changed  his  views  {c) 
with  reference  to  that  system,  and  we  need  not  be  surprised  that  a  liberality 
like  that  which  sprung  up  under  Zephyrinus,  and  an  act  of  pardon  like  that 
which  Oallistus  proclaimed  for  all  who  had  been  expelled  for  licentious  con- 
duct, should  have  made  this  church  in  the  eyes  of  the  stem  disciplinarian 
worse  than  a  den  of  robbers,  {d)  And  yet  the  West  continued  so  tolerant 
toward  Montanism  that  a  number  of  female  martyrs  adhering  to  that  system 
have  been  canonized  in  the  African  Ohurch,  (e)  and  TertuUian,  to  whom  the 
Paraclete  was  rather  a  restorer  of  apostolical  order  than  an  innovator,  and 
religious  ecstasy  was  rather  a  theory  than  a  principle,  became  so  prominent, 
that  he  was  looked  upon  as  the  model  for  the  Latin  theology.  This  theology 
was  then  disinclined  to  any  philosophical  theories  respecting  divine  things ; 
it  spoke  of  Athens  and  the  Academy  as  irreconcilable  with  Jerusalem  and 
the  Church,  and  turned  its  whole  attention  to  questions  respecting  the  con- 
dition of  the  Church,  and  things  essential  to  salvation.  A  congregation  of 
TertullianUU  in  Carthage  could  have  had  nothing  but  a  local  importance,  and 
reunited  with  the  Catholic  Church  in  the  time  of  Augustine.  (/)  Thascius 
Caecilius  Cyprianus  may  be  regarded  as  the  personal  representative  of  the 
Catholic  Church  in  his  day.  (g)    Having  eiyoyed,"  &o. 

After  "  assistance,"  p.  90,  8th  line  from  the  bottom :  "  and  to  encourage 
others  to  a  similar  course  he  extolled  such  acts  as  an  expiation  for  all  the  sins 
of  believers."  (h) 

Instead  of  the  sentence  beginning  *^  Cyprian  had  now  become,"  p.  91,  line 
7th,  read :  "  Cyprian  was  now  pledged  to  die  a  martyr's  death,"  (i) — and  at 
the  close  of  §  84,  p.  91,  add :  ^*  Both  leaders  in  the  African  Church  died  in 
the  assurance  that  they  would  soon  be  raised  again  from  the  dead  by  the 

a)  De  ylrgg.  veL  c.  L 

b)  D«  po«nit  c.  758.  oomp.  de  pudlc.  o.  1.  oomp.  16.  Ad  oxor.  I,  8.  oomp.  de  fiigft  in  penecat— De 
Tlrgg.  veL  c.  la. 

c)  Noto  «,  p.  89. 

cf)  The  edictnm  peremtoTimn  Tert  de  pud.  o.  1.  has  now  its  complete  ezpUiuttion :  (Orig.)  Haer. 
BeAit  1.  IX.  p.  290l 

«)  Note/  p.  89.      /)  Ang.  haer.  16. 

g)  Vita  Cjpr.  per  Pontium,  Cfjos  Diaconnm  (Cjpr.  0pp.)  Among  the  Actls  Martjrii  are  the  two 
older  beginning:  Cam  Cypr.  and  Imp.  Valeriana — J.  Pearson^  Annales  Cyprianici, before  Fell's  edi- 
tion. F.  W.  ROtberg^  Cypr.  nacb  s.  Leben  a.  Wirken.  Gott  1881.  Rudtlbacht  cbr.  Biograpblo.  Lps. 
1850.  yoL  L  1. 

k)  De  Opera  et  Eleemosjuis  (85L)        0  De  ezbortat  martTril  (98S). 


702  APPENDIX    ANCIENT  OHUBCH. 

Yoice  of  their  rctnrning  Savior,  but  Tertallian^s  views  were  more  ardent  and 
fanciful,  since  his  eye  was  fixed  upon  a  kingdom  of  intellectual  and  spiritual 
blessings  indeed,  but  a  kingdom  where  every  thing  which  believers  lost  or  de- 
spised in  the  present  life  would  be  recompensed  by  terrestrial  enjoy- 
ments." (a) 

The  next  section  is  entitled  "  III.  The  School  of  Alexandria,"  and  in- 
cludes the  two  following  sections. 

After  the  third  sentence  of  the  section  read :  ^^  Athenagoraa  the  Apolo- 
gist (p.  51),  who  ventured  to  invoke  philosophy  to  the  defence  of  the  doo-' 
trine  of  the  resurrection,  (b)  is  regarded  as  the  founder  of  this  school." 

The  sentence  near  the  middle  of  p.  92,  commencing  "  His  superior,"  &o., 
is  altered  thus : — ^^  The  works  of  Clement  were  alone  capable  of  assisting  his 
higher  development,  nothing  but  his  position  as  a  teacher  took  him  to  the 
school  of  Ammonius  Saccaa,  and  he  never  was  concerned  in  transmitting  the 
New-platonic  traditions  with  a  rank  equal  to  that  of  Plotinns  himself."  (e) 

The  sentence  ending  with  the  word  ^*-  traditions,"  p.  98, 4th  line  from  bot- 
tom, continues  thus :  "  and  is  conditioned  by  an  exaltation  above  all  mutable 
interests." 

To  the  section  closing  on  p.  95,  add : — ^'  His  zeal  in  this  respect  was  ex- 
ceeded by  Hieracas^  whose  contemporaries  had  not  yet  learned  to  regard 
such  views  as  heretical.  This  founder  of  an  ascetic  association  near  Leonto- 
polis,  was  the  means  of  exciting  a  high  degree  of  literary  activity,  the  re- 
sults of  which  have  been  entirely  lost.  He  wrote  in  the  Coptic  popular  lan- 
guage, and  taught  that  the  Fall  of  the  soul  was  the  direct  result  of  its  efforts 
to  free  itself  from  corporeality.  He  thought  that  the  only  distinction  be- 
tween the  old  and  the  new  law  consisted  in  the  prohibition  of  marriage  by 
the  latter.  To  his  allegorical  explanations  of  the  Scriptures  belongs  his  incai^ 
nation  of  the  Holy  Ghost  in  Melchizedek.  There  was  nothing  repugnant  or 
hopeless  to  the  Alexandrian  doctrine  of  freedom  in  his  denial  of  salvation  to 
children  even  when  baptized."  {d) 

After  the  word  "  churches,"  Ime  10,  p.  97 :  "  1)  OospeU  of  the  Child- 
hood, the  Passion,  and  the  Resurrection  of  Jesus.  («)  2)  Acts  of  the  Apos- 
tles, especially  of  Peter,  and  an  account  of  the  unknown  fortunes  of  the 
twelve,  filled  with  fanciful  stories  of  their  mirades.  (/)  8)  The  Clementine 
Homilies  contain  the  controversial  discourses  of  Peter,  especially  with  Simon 
Magus,  which,  in  opposition  to  the  many  internal  and  external  parties  col- 

a)  TerttU.  do  ont  c.  5.  Adv.  Marc  III,  24.  (Do  spe  fldelium  is  lost)  Cjpr.  de  exhort  mart  c 
1.  De  mortallt  c.  2.  De  unit  Ecc.  c  16. 

b)  Tltpl  i.vcurrdo'tws  r&v  v€Kp&y,  ed.  JUeKenberg^  Lpa.  168& 

e)  Only  the  former  assertion  follows  ttom  Origen's  Epistle  in  JTim.  TL  eoo.  TI,  19.  and  the  oUmt 
must  rest  apon  the  aathc^ty  of  Porphyry,  (Vita  Plotini  o.  8aa)  who  certainly  knew  this  fSmher  in  Us 
youth,  and  upon  that  of  Longinus,  who  may  he  styled  another  Origen  among  the  heathen.  Note  <v 
p.  92.  R,  T.  Schmidtf  Ortg.  des  Neu-Platonikere  Bchrift  Sri  fihyot  Toiiyr^i  6  Bao-<Ac^s.  (Stud.  a. 
Krit  1842.  n.  1.) 

d)  Epiph.  baer.  67. 

e)  K.  n<iM^  Lehen  Jesn.  1 11.     Also,  Ew.  apoerypha  ed.  C  TUchendar/^  LpSL  1858. 

/)  Note  c,  p.  97.  FragmnL  Aetunm  8.  Jo.,  ed.  ThUo^  HaL  1847.  Acta  App.  apocr.  ex  ZXX  edd. 
graec  ed.  TUehendorf,  Lps.  1851.— K^pvy/io,  Tlpd^ttSf  *Aro«rdUiAff(t  Udrpov,  Jffut,  H.  eoa  III,  ft. 
0r4dnert  Beitrr.  vol  L  p.  SSln. 


APOCRYPHAL  LITEBATURK  703 

lected  at  Rome  about  the  middle  of  the  second  centnry,  endeavored  to  recon- 
cile the  Tarions  tendencies  in  the  Church  on  the  basis  of  a  peculiarly  colored 
Jewish  Christianity,  and  were  mingled  with  the  romance  of  Clement,  (a) 
The  continued  embellishment  of  this  story,  but  with  a  still  further  remoyal 
of  the  doctrine  into  the  background,  and  with  a  greater  approximation  to 
the  popular  faith  of  the  Catholics,  is  found  in  the  Recognitions  (avttyva><T€is\ 
translated  by  Rufinus.  (b)  In  the  first  half  of  this  work,  reference  is  made 
to  another  composition  from  Palestine,  probably  The  Preaching  of  Peter 
(jci^pvy/xa),  of  which  Peter  was  the  hero.  Of  the  two  epistles  to  James  pre- 
fixed to  the  Homilies,  the  first  was  written  in  the  name  of  Peter,  and  the 
other  in  the  name  of  Clement,  but  in  compliance  with  Peter^s  last  directions. 
It  is  not  yet  quite  clear  whether  the  Catholic  Church  attempted  to  make  use 
of  the  historical  portions  of  the  fictitious  Homilies  by  means  of  the  Recog^ 
nitions,  (c)  or  whether  the  Homilies  were  formed  from  the  Recognitions  for 
party  purposes,  or  whether  both  were  not  independently  formed  out  of  a 
still  older  work,  (d)  In  their  confused  references  to  the  consular  and  first 
bishop  of  Rome,  both  evidently  claim  to  be  the  composition  of  Clement,  who 
sprung  from  the  imperial  family,  and  after  many  unsuccessful  philosophical 
inquiries  after  truth,  found  not  only  peace,  but  the  lost  members  of  his  family 
in  Peter^s  church.  4)  Jewish  imitations  of  earlier  prophetic  visions  were 
sometimes  used  by  Christians  with  their  own  interpretation,  and  sometimes 
were  imitated  by  them,  in  many  cases  with  a  meaning  hardly  reconcilable 
with  Christianity,  and  in  others  to  complete  the  Messianic  prophecies  by  facts 
from  the  life  of  Jesus,  (e)  Thus  the  Ascension  of  Isaiah  mingles  together 
Jewish- Christian  and  heretical  elements  in  its  two  principal  parts ;  the  Be- 
loved one  descends  from  the  seventh  heaven  to  accomplish  in  human  form  his 
work  on  earth,  and  the  prophet  ascends  that  he  may  behold  the  future  course 
of  the  Mcssiah^s  kingdom,  until  the  final  judgment  and  the  glorias  of  the 
divine  Father,  and  dies  under  the  saw,  for  and  according  to  his  own 
prophecy.  (/)  The  Testaments  of  the  Twelve  Patriarchs  contain  the  moral 
exhortations  of  the  sons  of  Jacob  on  their  dying  beds  to  the  Jewish  nation. 
The  work  professes  to  have  come  from  a  period  before  the  Mosaic  law,  and 
to  contain  prophecies  of  a  Christ  from  the  tribes  of  Levi  and  Judah,  the 
High  Priest  and  the  King  of  an  everlasting  kingdom,  (ff)  Its  fundamental 
principles  indicate  that  it  was  written  by  a  native  Jew  of  the  second  century, 


a)  T&  K\riix4irria,  KXrifitvToSt  rwp  Tl4rpov  iiri^rifiwv  icripiryfAdrttv  iirirofi'ti.  After  the 
editt  by  Cotelerios  (Patres  app.)  and  Gallandi :  Clem.  Romani  quae  fenintur  Ilomiliaef  recogn.  A, 
SchicegUr,  Stuttg.  1847. 

b)  Afcer  the  edltt  by  Ck>te1eriii8  and  Oallandl :  S.  Clem.  Rom.  Recognttfones  Raflno  interprete, 
cur.  £.  G.  Oertdor/,  Lpe.  1888. 

0)  D.  r.  CMn.  Clementina  In  d.  IlalL  EncykL  vol  XVIIL  p.  868A.  A.  Schlismann,  d.  Clemen- 
Unen  nebst  den  verwandten  Schrr.  u.  d.  Ebionitism.  Ilamb.  1844.  nt  c,  p.  84. 

d)  J,  Hilgenfdd^  d.  Gem.  Recog.  u.  Homilien,  nach  Urspr.  u.  Inbalt  tTena.  1848.  RiUchL,  alt- 
kath.  K.  p.  158SB.  (making  the  Kerygina  against  Bai^ilidea  about  120,  tlie  Recognitions  against  Valen- 
tine abont  140,  and  the  Homilies  against  Mardon  about  160.)  Comp.  JIUgenf.  d.  Evv.  Just  p.  807n. 
(who  makes  the  Recogn.  original  only  in  substance.) 

e)  Note  d,  p.  97.        /)  Ibid,  last  part 

g)  Ibid.  Fabr.  Cod.  peeud.  yoL  L  p.  496881—^.  Kayter^  d.  Test  d.  12  Patr.  (Straasb.  Beltrr.  J«niL 
1861.  H.  &) 


704  APPENDIX.    ANCIENT  OHUBCH. 

bnt  by  one  who  linmbly  Bubmitted  to  the  oonnsel  of  Jehoyah,  and  rooo^zed 
in  the  last  apostle  of  the  tribe  of  Benjanim  a  chosen  instrament  of  Provi- 
dence, (a)  5)  The  lost  prophecies  ascribed  to  Uystaspes,  an  ancient  Persian 
seer,  gave  the  Asiatic  Christians  a  native  prophet  of  the  Messiah,  (b)  6)  When 
the  Hellenistic  Jews  appropriated  to  their  own  nse  the  prophetic  voice  of 
natare,  mythically  personified  among  the  heathen  in  the  Sibyls,  many  Chris^ 
tian  Sibyllists  arose  to  express  in  this  poetic  form  the  confidence  they  felt  in 
the  ultimate  victory  of  their  cause,  and  their  wrath  toward  evil  men ;  and 
the  Christian  apologists  appealed  to  these  divinely  inspired  voices  of  pagan- 
ism as  witnesses  among  the  heathen  themselves  of  equal  rank  with  the  Scrip- 
tural prophecies.  The  eight  books  of  the  Sibylline  Oracles^  gradually  collected 
after  the  second  century,  contain  a  heterogeneous  mixture  of  heathen,  Jew- 
ish, and  Christian  poems,  the  Christian  oonmiencing  soon  after  the  eruption 
of  Vesuvius  (79),  and- throwing  out  fresh  shoots  until  some  time  in  the  fifth 
century,  (c)" 

§  90  is  entitled  ^^  The  Son  of  Gfod,''  and  additional  references  for  i^  are : 

**J.  A.  DonMr^  EntwicklogsgeselL  d.  L.  y.  d.  PerBon  Chr.  yoL  L  is  on  the  flrat  4  centt  Stnttg' 
(1889).  1845.    (Z7a««)  Chr.  Dogm.  p.  SOIbs.  bV^r 

In  the  sentence  beginning  ^^  According  to,"  the  little  regard  for  the  Holy 
Ghost  is  qualified  by  the  clause  ^^  except  among  the  Montanists." 

The  sentence  near  the  middle  of  p.  99,  closing  with  the  word  ^^  Tertul- 
lian,"  continues :  *^  who  reproached  him  with  having  performed  two  of  the 
devil's  works  in  Rome,  viz.,  driving  away  the  Paraclete,  and  crucifying  the 
Father.  But*  Theodotus  the  Tanner,  who  came  about  the  same  time  from  By- 
zantium to  Rome,  excused  his  denial  of  Christ  by  saying  that  he  only  denied 
a  man,  and  he  was  driven  from  the  Church  by  Victor.  TheodotuSy  the 
money-broker,  honored  Melchizedek,  a  heavenly  Redeemer,  more  than  the 
earthly.  Koetu*  of  Smyrna,  and  probably  a  presbyter  of  Ephesus,  was  ex- 
cluded from  his  church  (about  200)  as  a  Patripassian,  notwithstanding  his 
denial  of  the  charge,  and  the  charge  itself  is  to  bo  explained  only  on  the 
ground  that  he  held  to  the  second  kind  of  Monarchianism.  But  as  Praxeas 
was  favored  by  Victor,  {d)  the  doctrine  of  Noetus,  which  was  propagated  in 
Rome  by  Cleomenes,  was  favored  by  the  bishop  Zephyrinus  under  the  in- 
fluence of  Callistus,  who  regarded  the  Son  as  only  a  human  manifestation  of 
the  Fnther  by  the  divine  Spirit  in  Christ,  so  that  the  Father  as  such  did  not 
sufiTer,  except  in  connection  with  the  Son.  Callistus  called  those  presbyters 
who  resisted  him  Ditheista  (diScot),  and  they  retorted  against  their  bishop 
that  the  heresy  of  the  Callistines  originated  with  the  principle  of  Heraditus, 
according  to  which  every  thing  may  be  its  opposite.  («)  The  party  of  the 
first  Theodotus  was  distinguished  for  secular  learning,  treated  the  Scriptures 
as  merely  human  productions,  and  was  powerful  enough  to  elevate  a  confes- 
sor to  the  episcopal  see.    It  was  not  long,  however,  before  their  bishop  was 


a)  Test  Benjamin  c.  11.         b)  Note  e,  p.  97. 

c)  Note/  p.  97.    a  Alexander,  Par.  1841.  2  vols.    FHedUeb,  LpflL  185S.— /Md.  de  odd.  SlbgrOL 
in  usom  nondam  adhlbftls.  Yrst  1847. 

d)  TertuL  adv.  Prax.  c.  68.       e)  {Origen.  Haeres.  BefbUt  p.  d79Mi) 


SUBOBD1NATIONIST8.    ECCLK8.  LITERATURE.  705 

attacked  in  the  night  hj  divine  or  episcopal  emissaries,  and  compelled  to  ab> 
dicate  at  the  feet  of  Zophyrinus,  and  Artemon^  who  maintained  that  the  doc- 
trine which  the  apostles  had  preached,  and  which  had  always  prevailed  in 
Rome,  was  that  the  Son  of  the  Virgin  was  superior  to  all  other  men,  merely 
on  account  of  his  righteousness,  and  that  this  had  been  corrupted  first  under 
Zephyrinus,  was  excommunicated,  (a)  Thus  these  three  contradictory  opin- 
ions were  then  (218-23)  openly  maintained  at  Rome,  but  the  merely  human 
view  had  been  already  condenmed,  and  its  opposite  extreme  was  represented 
by  a  bishop  whoso  reputation  had  been  tarnished.  In  Arabia  the  bishops 
took  decided  ground  against  their  colleague  Beryllus  of  Bostra,  who  de* 
nied,''  &c. 

The  sixth  sentence  of  §  92  reads :  "  All  these  wrote  on  the  same  stand- 
point  as  Eusebius,  in  the  spirit  of  the  dominant  Church.^'  It  is  said  that 
^^Fhilostorgius  found  and  honored  the  Gatholic  Church  in  the  vanquished 
party," — that  "  EvagHus  was  mild  in  his  general  judgments,  but  in  his  par- 
ticular application  passionate  for  orthodoxy,*^ — and  that  "  of  the  5  last  books 
of  Xiceph.  Callist,  nothing  now  remains  but  the  table  of  contents." 

To  the  references  for  Chap.  I.  p.  103,  add : 

**  K  Chatiely  Hist  do  la  destracUon  da  paganlBme  daos  Pempire  d'orient  Par.  1850." 

For  §  93 : 

•*  J.  Burekhardt,  d.  Zelt  Const  d.  Or.  Basel  1858.»' 

Near  the  middle  of  p.  103 :  "  the  consulting  of  oracles  as  well  as  the  of- 
fering of  sacrifices  was  prohibited,  but  ineflTectually," — ^and  "  the  emperor 
stamped  upon  his  coins  not  only  the  emblems  of  Christ  but  of  Apollo." 

For  I  94  an  additional  reference  is  made  to 

**F.  Strauss^  der  Romanilker  a.  d.  Throne  o.  Julian  d.  Abtr.  Manh.  1S47." 

And  for  §  98  to 

**  llffeU  d.  Akten  d.  ersten  allg.  S/n.  za  Nic.  (Th.  Quartalach.  ld5L  H.  1.)    Ihid.  Entsteh.  a.  Cha- 
rakterlst  d.  Arian.  (IWd.  H.  2.)  " 

To  the  second  sentence  of  §  102  it  is  added,  that  Arius  thought  the  Son 
of  God  '*  might  also  bo  adored  as  God." 

Substitute  for  the  word  "question,"  after  the  middle  of  p.  112:  "matter 
which  threatened  to  thwart  his  two  great  aims,  the  unity  of  the  Church,  and 
of  the  empire." 

It  is  said  (p.  114)  that  Aetius  and  Eunomius  "  denied  that  Christ  pos- 
sessed any  under ited  divine  nature," — in  §  104,  that  Marcellus  "  declared  that 
the  Logos  was  the  eternal  wisdom  of  God,  and  manifested  itself  as  the  power 
which  created  the  world,  but  did  not  become  the  only  begotten  Son  of  God 
until  the  Incarnation,"  &c. — and  that  his  deposition  was  "  at  Constantinople." 

In  the  first  sentence  of  paragraph  3d,  p.  115,  instead  of  "  a  sensuous  na- 
ture," read :  "  the  mere  incarnation  of  the  Logos." 

The  sentences  at  the  top  of  p.  117  are  changed,  and  read :  "  The  whole 
theological  literature  was  under  the  direction  of  two  schools  ;  that  of  Ales^ 

a)  Ku9,  H.  oeo.  y,  SSw 

46 


706  APPENDIX.    ANCIENT  CHURCH. 

andria^  with  the  new  tendency  which  it  received  during  the  ecclesiastieal 
controversies,  and  that  which  had  recently  sprung  up  at  Antioeh,  In  the 
former  prevailed  an  earnest  effort  to  comprehend  in  one  the  finite  and  the 
infinite,  an  allegorical  mode  of  interpretation,  the  general  spirit  of  Origen, 
though  "  &c.  From  the  Alexandrian  school  proceeded  "  none  hut  the  repre- 
sentatives of  the  theology  which  had  then  become  ascendant  in  the  Chiurch." 
Athanasius  (middle  of  p.  117)  "was  full  of  wrath  against  all  who  wished 
to  rend  the  indivisible  coat  of  Christ." — Basil  the  Great  was  "  the  admirer 
of  Libanins  as  well  as  of  St.  Anthony." — Synesius  (2d  sentence  in  §  107) 
•*'  was  powerfully  impressed  by  the  principles  of  Christianity,  but  remained  a 
faithful  disciple  of  Ilypatia." 

For  the  first  word  of  §  108,  read  "  Many." 

Add  to  the  references  for  "  III.  The  Pelagian  Controversy." 

**«/b.  Gfffcken^  Hist  8em!pe1asiani«ml  antlqalas.  (till  484.)  Oott  1S26.  \.  J.  G.  Voifft,  De  theorU 
Angnitiniana,  SemlpeL  et  Synergist  Goett  1S29.  LenUtn,  de  Pelagtonor.  doctr.  prfneii>fifl^  CotoB. 
1688.    «A  A  t/ixeoM,  d.  L.  d.  Pel  Lpa.  184V' 

To  those  for  §  110  : 

^  PotifdiOat,  Hist  de  8.  Aag.  Uebers.  y.  Harter.  Scbaffh.  18498a.  8  Tola." 

§§111  and  112  are  arranged  in  one  section,  and  entitled :  '^  Augustinism 
and  Semipelagianism." 

Nestorius  (p.  126,  after  "  orthodoxy  ")  "  attacked  the  honor  paid  to  a 
mother  of  Grod  as  a  new  paganism." 

After  "  epistle  "  (4th  line,  p.  128)  :  "  Christ  is  one  person,  in  his  divinity 
eternally  from  the  Father,  in  his  humanity  from  the  vir^n  mother  of  God, 
with  tico  natures,  inseparable  but  without  confusion,"  &c. 

§§121  and  122  are  united  and  entitled  :  "  The  Roman  Empire." 

Before  the  last  sentence  of  §  122 :  "  For  although  in  the  East  the  emperor 
himself  was  looked  upon  as  invested  with  a  kind  of  sacerdotal  character,  the 
people  regarded  it "  &c. 

After  the  first  sentence  of  §  123  :  "It  took  from  slavery  its  confidence  in 
its  own  equity,  and  every  act  of  manumission  was  encouraged  by  the  Church 
as  a  work  of  piety :  but,  on  the  other  hand,  those  who  refused  to  acknowl- 
edge the  owners  of  slaves  as  Christians  were  rejected,  slaves  were  admonished 
to  render  obedience  for  God^s  sake,  and  masters  to  regard  their  slaves  as 
brethren  redeemed  by  the  same  price  as  themselves."  (a) 

After  "  protection  "  (line  8,  p.  138)  :  "  Laws  were  enacted  to  sustain  the 
sacredness  of  marriage,  but  the  old  Roman  penal  laws  against  coelibacy  were 
abolished  even  in  the  time  of  Constantine." 

The  sentences  at  the  foot  of  p.  139  should  read :  "  Institutions  of  benevo- 
lence of  every  kind  to  mitigate  the  miseries  of  a  gradually  decaying  social 
condition  originated  in  the  Church,  (b)    Its  wealth  contributed  to  its  power 


a)  Or^.  M.  Ep.  YI,  12.  Chry909L  ad  Pbilem.  (yoL  IL  p.  77a)  HUr,  ad  UaroeL  Ep.  20.— Cbne. 
Oungr.  can.  S.—Neander,  Denkw.  yoL  II.  p.  IftSaa.  [Memorials  of  Ciur.  Life,  traosL  by  iSytoiMX, 
Lond.  1852.  p.  806.]  MoMsr,  Aafbeb.  d.  Sklav.  darch  d.  Chrlstenth.  in  d.  entea  15  Jhh.  (Tabc  Qoar- 
talach.  1884.  H.  1.) 

b)  B.  Chastely  Etadea  hist  aor  I'lnflaenoe  de  la  cbarite  darant  laa  premiexs  aleolea  obr6t  Par.  1851 


SABDIOA.    CHABITIES.    HEBMITS.  707 

and  freedom.  The  management  of  its  fands  was  under  the  snperintendence 
of  the  bishop  through  a  steward  (otKovo/xof),  the  distribution — "  &c. 

The  application  of  the  2d  sentence  in  §  126,  should  be  limited  to  ^^  the 
East." 

The  sentence  beginning  in  the  6th  line  from  the  foot  of  p.  140  should  com- 
mence :  "  In  the  fourth  century  female  presbyters  disappear,  (a)  and  the  ordi- 
nation of  deaconesses,"  &o. 

The  sentence  before  the  lost  on  p.  142  should  read :  ^^  On  account  of  these 
divisions  the  council  of  Sardica  (847)  committed  to  Julius,  Bishop  of  Home, 
a  judicial  cognizance  of  the  reception  of  appeals  in  the  case  of  bishops.  But 
when  this  decree  was  presented  to  the  African  Ohurch  as  a  regulation  coming 
from  the  Nicaean  Synod,  it  refused  obedience,  and  threatened  every  one  who 
should  appeal  to  any  ecclesiastical  authority  beyond  the  sea."  (b) 

Before  "  Synods  "  in  line  2d,  p.  148,  insert  "  first." 

In  the  last  sentence  on  p.  145,  Gregory  is  said  to  have  improved  Ohuroh 
music  "  by  simplifying  its  stylo,  and  by  his  school" 

After  "  charms  "  in  the  last  line  of  p.  147 :  "  the  Ohurch  contended  con- 
tinually against  superstitions  derived  from  paganism,  but  unconscious  of  their 
origin."  (c) 

Before  "  The  Ohurch,"  line  10th,  p.  148  :  "  The  Ohristian  duty  of  bene- 
ficence which  was  even  then  performed  with  a  munificent  generosity,  was 
enforced  by  preachers  on  communistic  principles,  appealing  to  the  avarice  of 
men."  (d)  After  "  Spirit,"  a  few  sentences  beyond :  **  and  even  the  old  idea  of 
the  millennial  kingdom  had  to  yield  to  the  interpretation,  that  it  meant  only 
the  spiritual  influence  of  the  gospel."  (e) 

The  2d  sentence  of  §  184  reads:  ^^The  necessity  of  some  fellowship 
brought  the  hermits  together  in  a  community  of  neighboring  huts  (Xavpa)." 
Instead  of  "  Amun  in  the  desert  of  Nitra "  in  the  next  sentence,  insert : 
**  Macarius  in  the  Sketic  desert."  (/) 

The  date  near  the  foot  of  p.  150  should  be  "  422." 

^^  Add  to  the  sentence  emhng  on  line  7,  p.  152 :  "  and  in  the  African 
Church  offerings  for  the  dead  wore  laid  upon  their  graves,"  (g) — and  to  the 
last  sentence  of  the  same  section :  *^  seeking  edification  ftom  the  vestiges  of 
past  ages."  (h) 

Add  to  the  references  for  §  189  : 

**  A.  Z.  ZetUrmann,  dlo  antiken  a.  chr.  Baslllken.  Lps.  1S47.  J.  Kreuser^^chr.  KBau,  a.  Oeach. 
Sjmbollk,  Bil<lnerei.  Bonn.  1S5\.  i  vols.—/*.  KugUr^  IIB.  d.  Ge«ch.  d.  Malerol  A.  Con$tantln.  S  ed. 
BrL  1847.  voL  I.  p.  1-107.'^ 

a)  Cont.  lAiftdic  can.  11. 

6)  C€fnc,  Afric  £p.  ad.  BonlC  {Comtani,  p.  1018&)  Cone,  MUevtt,  can.  23.  {CodtJp  eantu  JScc 
A/ric.  c.  28. 

c)  St/n.  IniU.  c  61.  62.  65.    Comp.  OhaiM^  Destract  du  Pagan,  p.  8098S. 

d)  Chnynost.  Iloin.  In  Act.  IL  24.    (0pp.  vol  IX-  p.  98.) 

e)  Aug.  De  civ.  Del  XX,  498. 

/)  Jfaairii  Aegjptll  Epp.,  Homlllaram  loci,  precea,  tA.II.J.  FloM^  CoL  1850.  Comp.  7TfoiUf»- 
dor/,  RelM  In  d.  Or.  voL  I.  p.  119*. 

g)  Aug.  C<»nfe»».  VI,  2. 

A)  Alroa^ly  IJut.  VI,  11. — Itincrariam  Ilierosolymltanum,  a.  888.— i/l  Jl.  Jleidegger^  de  peregrlna- 
tinnlb.  rcl.  Tar.  1670.    Hobiruon,  Palestine,  vcL  IL  p.  SOSaa. 


708  APPENDIX.    ANCIENT  CHURCH. 

The  last  olanse  of  the  2d  sentence  in  this  Bection  is  limited  to  ^^  the  West- 
ern Church." 

Before  the  last  clause  of  the  dd  sentence,  insert :  "  the  central  portion 
elevated  about  the  height  of  the  windows  above  the  side  aisles,"  &c. 

Before  the  last  clause  of  the  5th  sentence  insert :  ^^  where  monuments 
were  usually  erected,"  &c. 

A  few  sentences  after,  "  the  Roman  teraple-form,"  should  read :  "  built  in 
the  form  of  the  Rotunda  for  temples  and  baths." 

After  "  Sahator,^^  line  2,  p.  156 :  "  surrounded  with  emblems  of  the  sal- 
vation of  man,  and  in  the  midst  of  the  apostles,  whose  countenances  were 
serious  and  dignified,  and  whose  persons  were  in  the  ancient  Roman  oostume. 
In  the  seventh  century,  however,  this  style  ceased  to  be  popular,  for  then  a 
general  decline  took  place  in  all  the  arts,  and  the  Byzantine  style  which  origi- 
nated in  Constantinople,  and  showed  a  sympathy  with  this  corruption,  pre- 
yailed  with  its  inherited  skilfalncss,  but  its  complete  want  of  nature." 

After  "  chosen  "  in  line  7th,  p.  156,  the  sentence  continues :  "  and  Chris- 
tian and  pagan  symbols  were  mingled  together,  especially  in  the  reliefs  of  the 
sarcophagi."  (a) 

After  the  1st  sentence  of  §  142  :  "  At  its  foundation  lay  also  the  question 
which  had  then  become  so  prominent,  whether  the  whole  influence  of  the 
priesthood  was  derived  from  the  personal  character  of  its  members,  or  from 
the  general  grace  communicated  through  their  order." 

The  first  sentence  of  §  143  :  "  Audius  (Udo)  broke  off  from  the  Church 
in  Mesopotamia  because  it  would  not  listen  to  the  exhortations  to  repentance 
which  the  zealous  layman  gave  it,"  &c. 

After  the  last  sentence  in  §  143 :  "A  class  of  persons  who  arrogantly 
called  themselves  Apostolicals  (also  'A7rora<cTiicoi),  from  their  little  corner  in 
Asia  Minor  claimed  to  be  the  only  true  Church,  and  held  out  no  hope  to 
those  who  possessed  property  or  lived  in  marriage.  They  agreed  substantially 
with  the  tendency  which  proceeded  from  Eustathius^  the  honored  Bishop  of 
Sebaste^  according  to  which  there  was  no  special  merit  in  martyrdom,  which 
proudly  or  restlessly  separated  from  the  great  Church,  and  were  finally  cut 
off  from  it  at  the  Synod  of  Gangra  (between  862  and  870)." 

An  additional  reference  for  §  144 : 

**^piph.  haer.  62.    Augmt,  haer.  81." 

After  the  1st  sentence  of  §  144:  "Their  worship  reminds  one  of  the 
Adamites^  who  were  followers  of  a  pupil  of  Carpocrates,  and  were  first  men- 
tioned during  the  last  part  of  the  fourth  century,  under  the  imputation,  by 
common  report,  of  wishing  in  their  grotto  churches  to  bring  back  a  state  of 
paradisiac  innocence,  by  means  of  a  paradisiac  style  of  dress.  They  there- 
fore rejected  all  relations  founded  upon  distinctions  of  sex.  The  condemna- 
tion of  the  Priscillianists  was  obtained  at  the  synod."  &c. 

After  "  letters  "  in  2d  line  of  §  147 :  "  and  in  the  modern  legislation." 
In  the  middle  of  p.  164  :  "  Thor  is  the  god  of  thunder  who  overcomes 


a)  Piper,  OeAcb.  d.  Osterfestes.  (BerL  l^iA.)  ToL  L  p.  88.  77s8. 


THOS.    THS  0BBMAN8.    SPANISH  GHBIBTIAN&  709 

winter  and  all  the  powers  of  nature  hostile  to  man,  and  is  the  hero  who  is 
especially  the  fiiend  of  the  people.^' 

After  "  unmolested,"  line  4th,  p.  166  :  "  The  conquerors  revered  a  saint 
like  Severinits  (<L  ahout  481)  of  unknown  origin,  who,  without  official  dig- 
nity, but  claiming  to  act  by  the  divine  command,  with  an  extensive  spirit- 
nal  influence,  ameliorated  the  miseries  of  the  national  migrations  in  the 
countries  along  the  Danube.    The  German — ^^  &c. 

After  ^'  sect,"  in  the  last  sentence  of  §  158 :  "  some  sought  martyrdom 
by  reviling  Mohammed,  others  despaired  of  Christ,"  &c. 


INDEX. 


Aarnn,  Convents  fD«  (^. 

Abel  Ministry,  57a,  65& 

Abelard,  241, '88^ 

Abderrhaman,  IQS» 

Abgarus,  85i 

Abraham  a  St  Clara,  520b. 

Abraxas,  7S,  69& 

Abaalon  uf  RoeekUde^  249i 

Ababekr,  IIU. 

Abyssinia,  108. 

AcaciiLS  lU  12Sw 

Academy,  Platonic,  17,  828. 

Aohainoth.  79. 

Acta  Apotitolonim,  97. 

Adelbert   of  Bremen,   214;   of 

Mentz,  lS5,  190;   of  I'ragoe, 

250l 
Adamites,  70S. 
Adiaphurislic  Cootror.,  897, 405, 

409. 
Adoptionists,  ISO. 
Advent,  IM :  Second,  40,  94. 
Advocatla,  21  & 
Aegidius  of  Vitorbo,  2S1 
Aelia  Capitolina,  42. 
Aelianu»,  47. 
Aeneas  Svlvius,  2S0& 
AeoDB,  16m. 
Aerios,  159. 
Aetias,  114,  705. 
Alfre,  Arehblahop»  628. 
African  Churchets  62,  61& 
Agabus,  8S. 
AgaiMU\  41, 158. 
Agatho,  132. 
Agenda  Controv.,  56T& 
Agnes,  St,  152. 
Agobard  of  Lyons,  283. 
Agonistic!,  CircunicolUonefS  15& 
Agricola,  897,  408^ 
Agripi>a,  2&. 
*Aic€>aAoi.  12S. 
Albanians,  856. 
Albericus,  ISS^ 
Albert    of    Brandenbarjr,   875 ; 

of  Mentz,  868,  872,  892;    of 

Riga,  251 ;  of  Strasboorg,  264. 
Albert  Durer,  806.  445. 
Albertinus  Ma.««atus,  264 
Albertns  Magnus,  ;320. 
Albigensian  War,  255a^ 
Albornoz.  274. 
Alcain,  179, 180. 
Aleander»  871. 


Alexander  Sevems,  46. 

Alexander  of  Alexandria,  112; 
of  llales,  820;  of  Rofisia,  6d7, 
681. 

Alexander  II..  192;  III.,  20^1., 
214,  216;  v.,  276;  VU  282, 
853;  VIL,  512,  617;  VIIL, 
513. 

Alexandria,  Bishopric,  61, 141. 

Alexandrian  Theolugy,  91a8. 

Alexandrian  and  Antiochian 
schools,  117, 126,  70& 

Alexiani,  818. 

Alexias  Comncnus,  262. 

Alfiadur,  16& 

Alfhid  the  Great,  234. 

Algiers,  664. 

Allegri  Gregor&o,  46& 

Allefnand  of  Aries,  280. 

Alliance  Evang..  592;  German, 
605;  German  Diet,  574;  Ho- 
ly, ftSls. 

All  Saints.  154. 

AU  SonL%  224. 

Alogl,99. 

Alorobradosy  519s. 

Altar,  69. 

Altenburg,  865,  56a 

Altensteiii,  Minister,  56& 

Altorl  Socini&ns,  4:)5k. 

A 1  varus  Pelagius,  34dw 

Akop,  12, 

Amalrich  ot  Beno,  840. 

AmbnWus,  118,  188,  158, 159i 

America,  888,  475;  North,  601sk 
664. 

Ammionns  Marcellinas,  10^ 

AmnioniiiH  Saccas,  48. 

Ampulla  Sacra,  166,  625. 

AnMMlori;  8S0,  392,  406eL 

AmyraUl,  490. 

Anabaptism,  70,  90. 

Anabaptkits,  481s.  610. 

Ananus,  26. 

Anastasiuss  12Sv  132. 

Au.itlieniatu^ins,  126. 

AndorM)n,  418. 

AndnK^a  Jac.,  409;  J.  YaL^  449. 

Andronicus,  854. 

Angel  Bretlireu,  508. 

Angela  of  Hreseia,  468L 

Angelica  of  Port  Royal,  617a. 

Angolico  of  Fies'ole,'805. 

Angels,  Worship  ot  152. 

Angelas  SUesius,  520. 


Anglican  CbQrcb^4S)8L,  4ti,  49TaL, 

598a. 

Anglo-Saxona,  167.  172. 

AnhalL  418. 

Anna  Lee,  571 

Anoegam,  12. 

Anomians,  111. 

Ansegisua.  2091 

Ansolm  (.^anUb^  198,  239;  of 
Laon,  Glositea,  243. 

Aosgnr.  246k, 

AnsiMcli,  Gen.  Synod,  574 

Antliimus,  129. 

Anthn)(K>mnrphltes,  121, 16&. 

Antidicomarianitea,  15&. 

Antlnomian  Oontrov.,  402%. 

Antioch,  BLthoprtc,  6L 

Antioohtan  School  117^  126. 

AntUrinitarians^  482. 

Antonelli,  628,  684. 

Antoninus  Pios,  45;  of  Flor- 
ence, 2^. 

Antonlns.  Hermit,  &4 ;  of  Padoa^ 
298 :  Hospitallers  of  St.,  228. 

Antony  Uhlch,  498. 

Aphtbartodoc«tae,  1S9l 

Apocrypha,  71,  96^  614,  70298. 

'A»o#faT<{<rTaffij,  79,  M. 

ApoIUnarLs  115,  11&. 

Apolionlus  45;  of  Tyana,  47. 

Apollos.82. 

ApoU«gii«ls,  50SS..  835.  500. 

Aiwlo^ry,  Augsburg  Coot,  8sJ. 

Apostfes,  25.  8S. 

Ai>oetoIlcalN  841a.  708^ 

Apoistolic  Brethren,  341& ;  Can- 
ons, 57a  ;  Cliorch,  24& ;  Con- 
gregation, 617 :  CfWstRatiuns, 
57s. ;  FatbenvS6B.,728^ ;  Vicars^ 
684 

Appeals  to  Gen.  CooncUa,  29L 

Amienzel,  Reform.  8S& 

Apikropriatlon,  Principle,  650l 

Apnleiua,  47. 

Aquarii,  64. 

Arabituw,  lOSfl^  168,  385. 

Aranda  of  Spain,  <^T. 

Areesilaus,  17. 

Archbishops,  244s.,  see  Metro- 
politans. 

Archdeaoona,  141,  215. 

Architecture,  Eteles.,  iSiaa^&XL 
675s. 

Arch|iro8bytera,  141. 

ArelateSynod^lll. 


iriwlKn.  niiL,  Its. 
ArUnlDDm  B^nod,  114. 
ArbUdU,  ApulnflM.  DO. 
ArMotle.  Ifc,  m.  81U. 


irtenion,  ».  7». 

Alt!  In  MUlii;eA;ei,80I. 

Au,Dui'lrlMor  tlie.1«. 


Aiii!ibiinC4afeHlaii.S°S:  Diet, 

IdubjU,  10. 

incuillnr  Enmltu,  tnH. 


Aiutrli.CUholte.WS.II4l>;Prcil- 
HUnt,  4n>.,  49av..  M.*!.  «»«. 

Aiipion,  178, 3;i.  S7S.  ea,  mh, 
m. 


Ib.bTt.iiluiEtlKSTt.aia. 

linciii,  iiuger,  aM;  oT  Virulun, 

Urdtit  CunfcHniv,  CM:  Contn- 
vrrsj.  M4:  Ul^ntUioii,  SSI; 


Ihdin.  4111 
IMiliir.  1* 


.  _  .    ..._...  r.,  IK,  WI. 
ltilN.iii.>ii,  TUMjnns,  18S. 
Ilnn.  lilt.  ail. 
m^liun,  41, 10.  193.1191. 
Ii*l<ll-4<iiiim.  lU;  of  Flora 


l^ink'iuirs  Id. 

Ilirl.ni>>,  A^i. 


,  ^Sr!.  MI,  SM,  SIX,  ' 


K& 


«  Lire.  ai& 

auihiulu,  SIT;  Jwd, 


ll.:n>,  Amalrich  nC  MA  !  BudiUsat,  4>1. 

HvnnllrL  I^'IU.  1>A  tW:  of '  UuddhlHT. 47Sa. 
NnKlL  1M:  III.  IfJA:  VIIL.    nu[ruii,!VM, 
IS.);   ]X,.1WI;  X..1K:  XI.,    tmifnhkfii,  )ISU.41K 
j;i:   Xli..  i:*:  XIII.,  MA    UDrinriidi. aAA 
Mfl',  XIV„M4.ai>.  I  Bnlflngar.  8«1. 

ll.-.|l;.-u.  L,.  11,8  <-l,llrrh,  IS>.         !  Hurchinl  of  WofdU,  »!« 
1t,'ri.i.!t-lt.'rn''ji»<r<,  »'<:).  '  UuncD^r1lu^  ISD*. 

ll^n.ant'.pf  (Tulr"  iuv."l«»,' JOOl     UllllU'r,  Sift 

■J!'.:  iVK  -lu.  ■■  ajiMDtiBt^ SM  MOi. 

Bt'rrt,'.  I>»'v{>ti..n  U,  801;  lU-\ 

r..ril».,:,.    H.7  0 

Cuellluiu^  lai. 


I«rna  nr  Clugnl,  iU. 


<MtM\  180;    c«,( 


I'jlp 


lUHlt,  a,  48*).; 


Kliii,  ta. 
l(l»>IK«pt<>imI0,8l8. 


_ lUO.  jKob.  444. 

,  '  ltiwhii>cr,J.  1L,4H. 

I  BnUiliii.  ISA 
I  BochtiIIm,  Ml- 

HoiwinlHW,  1 

BahfDiiu  III 


I'ar 


.i<)ie<i'>yiEl>I,4S*>. 


:  Il^llnglmikfc  MO.  .  (■■TKilU.  43. 

'  ]l.il<.in>tl''nl>Dr-Iir.lSA  I'vvcl. 4«1. 

ll.Hi«.«rliinL  lUl,  81S.  i:trlpo»s.  I'«iim 

lS:n\ttnii  iVlnMi.   \<l\  ITS,    4'uJlD>1>.  tlS^ 
7A   H;  Vlll„«l,lfsl>.a"l.     t?nrli»i,  Won.  W 
Bontls,  Cvur.  »32«,  ISt ;  11*1- '  Cwl'taill.  H«"-. 

■       .rlnu.!lBa._  L;«iLi,.(.k*t20 

ll.™i>M,  B.  ailt  .MA  wo'  (■■•r|v»T«llMii-.'  < 

]t.•llrl>'ll^  126W.,  ««I».  Ckic-Iii-.  4-0, 


712 


INDEX. 


paaBiodorus.  188, 151. 

Castellio,  447. 

CtfQistry,  S88flL,  404a. 

Cfttacoinba,  69. 

OfUapbrjgcs,  (MSi 

CatechiHin  of  France,  584;  of 
Heidolboi^.  418 ;  Lntber'B,  882 ; 
Roman  us,  466. 

CatechamenA,  65. 

Oatharine  de  Bora,  880;  de  Me- 
dici, 427:  of  RuMia,  666;  of 
SleDa,  808s. 

Cathari»t8,  25LW.,  842. 

CatbodraK  141,  804,  674. 

Catbolic  Cbarch,  62, 146. 

CathoUciara,  68,  147,  151,  460, 
658 ;  and  Protestantism,  468&, 
48688. 

Catbolicus,  62,  667. 

Cellitae,  818. 

Celsas,  49. 

Censorsbip  of  Books,  288,  460b. 

Centartae  Magdeb.,  7. 

Cerdon,  81. 

Gerlnthas,  84 

Gevennea,  495. 

Ghalcedon,  127. 

Chaldean  Chri:»tlans,  127. 

Chalmers.  597. 

Chantal  Francisca,  468. 

Chapters,  214,292;  Controv.  on 
Three,  180. 

Charles  Albert,  622. 

Charles  Alex,  of  Wurtemb.,498; 
the  Great,  169,  178,  174,  179; 
AogURUiK,  540 ;  the  Gross,  1S7 : 
the  Bald,  1S7 ;  of  Anjou,  268, 
270;  Martel,  16S,  172;  Stuart 
I..  425 ;  1 1.,  497s. ;  I V.  of  Spain, 
274;  v., 870s., 414s., 429;  Vlll. 
of  Franco,  2S2.  852;  IX.,  42S; 
X,  625^;  IX.  of  Sweden, 
418s. 

Cliarter,  German,  578 ;  Imperial, 
418. 

Chateaubriand,  584. 

Chazarss  25Gs. 

■Chemnitz,  Martinua,  898a.,  409, 
410. 

Cherbury.  499. 

Chleregatl,  374. 

Children,  Baptism  of,  70,  224, 
481. 

ChilUsm,  40.  94,  298a,  707. 

Chllperic  173. 

Clilna,  103,  883,  474a.,  5218.,  616, 
668s. 

Ctioral,  446. 

ChorcpiscopI,  60,  214,  298. 

Chosr(»es,  lu7. 

Christian  I.  of  Saxony,  410b.  ;  of 
Mayence,  221. 

Christians,  26. 

Christiornll.,  419;  111,419. 

Christina  of  Spain,  680s. ;  of 
Sweden,  512. 

Chrlstma^  154. 

Clirlstiipher,  152. 

Christo  Sacrum,  671. 

Christ  Party  at  C/orinth,  82. 

Ohro«lepinff  of  M entz,  176. 

Cljrysooherws  Paullcian,  262. 

Chrvsostoiii,  120a. 

Chubb,  500. 

Church,  1 ;  Ideal  of;  4878. :  El- 
ders of,  571 ;  Architecture, 
155s. ;  Alliance  Evane.,  590 : 
Conference,  5S7 ;  Sinpinc,  hW, 
800s.,  445.x..  675.^;  History, 
Idea  of,  1  ;  Province,  2 ;  Value 
of.  8;  Proj»erty,  216;  Music, 
465,  485,  675. 

Cimabufi,  805. 


ClrcnmcellioneB,  158^ 

Cistercians,  22a 

avil  Marriace,  624. 

Clara  of  AssTsi,  296. 

Clarendon,  Diet  ot;  20a 

CIaudin.\  Emperor,  87;  of  Tu- 
rin, 288 ;  of  Wand&beck,  542l 

Clausen,  561. 

Clausenburg,  Diet  of^  417. 

Clemangis,  825,  844. 

Clement  of  Alexandria,  918. ;  of 
Rome,  86,  57;  Droste.  689a; 
Flavins.  87 ;  II  .190 :  III.,  196 ; 
IV.,  2(^3,  270;  v.,  272s.,  811; 
VL,  274;  VII.,  27^  876,  890, 
421,  450;  VIII.,  456,  466,  467 ; 
IX.,  512,  518:  X.,  512;  XI., 
518,  518:  XII,  514;  XIII., 
524 ;  XIV.,  525. 

Clement,  Dominican,  423. 

Clementinae,  88s.,  236.  702s.,  697. 

Clerg>',  57,  140,  176,  1988.,  201a, 
814. 

Clermont,  Synod,  196, 197. 

Clovis,  IOC. 

Clugnl,  Congregation,  226. 

Coccelus.  490. 

Cochin  China,  664. 

Cochlaeus,  360. 

Cock,  I>e,  596. 

Codex  Dionya,  Thcod.,  and  Jos- 
tin,  185s. 

Coele^Une  III.,  205;  V.,  270. 

Coelestlus  122,  124. 

Cwlibacv,  C8,  143, 176,  198,  222, 
814,  653,  706. 

Coelicolae,  lo7. 

C-ola  dlltienzo,  274& 

Coligny,  423. 

CoIletdaJL-tm,  492,  672. 

Collegiants,  482. 

Collins,  499. 

Collyridianl,  152. 

C'olombino,  817. 

Colonna  Sciarra.  272. 

Columba,  167,  177. 

Columbanus,  163. 

Columbus,  833. 

Commines,  264. 

C-ommodus,  45. 

CoiuLeni,  261,  262,  856 

Communism,  679,  707. 

Conception,  Immaculate,  224, 
801. 

Concord,  Book  of,  410 ;  Form  of, 
409. 

C-oncordat,  Aschaffcnburg,  281; 
New  German,  C35;  French, 
235,  5338 ,  625 ;  Tuscan,  628 ; 
of  Worms,  199. 

Conconiium  of  Wittenberg,  899. 

Condillac,  523. 

C-onfe-^aio  Augustana,  838;  Hel- 
vetica, 416;  Tctrapolitana, 
890. 

Confc«|(k>ns,  Augustine's,  124s. 

CH)nfe88or8,  56,  90. 

Confederation,  590 ;  Swiss,  8888. 

C^nflrm.ition,  70,  692. 

Confucius,  474. 

Confutatio  Conf  Augsb.,  888^ 

CongregHtio  de  AnxOiis,  467. 

Congregation  A  post,  617. 

C/ongregntions,  445. 

Congreirati»)nalists,  603. 

Conrad  III.,  201 ;  of  Ilochstedo, 
808;  of  Marburg,  294,  80S. 

(\)nra<llno,  26s. 

OMisalvi.  53:J,  674. 

C^nsciontiarians,  501. 

Con.*lstorie8,  441 ;  Prussian,  6S6t 

C<»n8istory,  Supreme,  Frencli, 
60S;  Prussian,  578. 


Constance,  Ooandl,  277&,  S91, 
849s. ;  Bishopric,  646. 

Gonstans  II..  182 

Con«tantia  of  Sicily,  208,  a06i,  97a 

Constantinople,  Synod  oC  115a. 
380, 182, 156,  259, 855;  Storm- 
ing oi;  207,  856. 

Cont'tantinus  Magnpi,  65,  108, 
118,  152.  157;^Ki«tlon  oC; 
184;  Copronymot,  156;  Po- 
gonatns.  182 ;  Sylvanna,  150. 

Constantius,  114;  Chlorua,  56. 

Constitution  Unigenitna,  51S; 
Cnvil,  of  French  Clergy.  581. 

Constitutiones  Apostolicae,  67. 

Contarini.  898. 

Convent  Life,  149s.,  225flL,  816a, 
462s.,  662a 

Convertitea,  470, 672a. 

Convocations,  442. 

C'onvnlsionairaa,  619. 

Coiteraicus,  489. 

Copts,  181. 

Coquorel,  609. 

Coran,  1()9, 110. 

Coniay,  Charlotte,  681. 

Cordicolatras,  621. 

Corinth,  Parties  In,  82. 

G>meliua  674;  Rom.  Bi8bopi,67. 

Corpus  Christi  Festival,  801. 

Corpus  Evangelicorum,  492. 

C-orpus  Juris  Canooici,  2S6. 

Correggio,  464. 

Coscia,  Cardinal,  613a. 

Ciithen,  Assembly  at,  679. 

C-ovenant,  Scottish,  424. 

Cramer,  9. 

Cranmer,  422. 

Crell,  Nic,  411. 

Crescens,  51. 

Crescentius,  189. 

Cresconins,  18& 

Cromwell,  426. 

Cross  Elevation  of  the,  IM 

CruciAxes,  156. 

Crusades,  196,  220 ;  End  of  tbe, 
269. 

Crypto-Calvinism,  407. 

Culdeea,  167. 

Cumberland  Presbyterians,  €04. 

Cup,  Withholding  of  the,  224a, 
850. 

Curialista,  288,  47a 

Cyprianns,  43,  SQsa.,  701. 

Cyran,  Abbot  of  St,  617. 

Cyrillus  of  Alexandria,  126, 182 ; 
(ConsUntina^),  248;  of  Jeru- 
salem. 113;  Lucari8,480. 

Cyru^  l8L 

Czechen,  606. 

Czeiski,  657. 

D 

Dalberg,  686. 

Damiani,  192,  221,  224,  812. 

T)amietta,268. 

Dancera,  818s.,  446,  606. 

Dandolo,  207. 

Dannecker,  674. 

Dannenmayr,  IL 

Dante,  826a, 

Danz,  10. 

Darby,  61 L 

Darmstadt  644. 

David  of  Dlnanto,  ft40. 

Deaconesses,  89,  140,  707. 

Deacon.**,  88,  5& 

Death,  fur  Uereaj,  156,  480. 
i  DeciuB,  46. 
I  Decretab,  False,  184;  Gkc^otUx^ 

Dcista,  498aa 

Dwnetriat  ot  Alexaadiia,  9Sl 


DtppBl),  601. 

^  tu,  4ifa,  «i» 

io£niiet]1ai,!lM. 


1)«  Cuts,  t«e. 


AuwTofiii  11,  lOa^  NK. 


I>h>l«nu,  lie*. 
DksnMui,  ni. 
DhniT<Hii>  Alci.,  M,  100:  An- 

iKiiglu,    13i.    in  1     EzlgDU, 

IM:  Uoniuiu.  100. 


IHsdiillns  Akuia,  to. 
DbMiim,  «Kk.  KBtt. 
IltohlrnU.  4W,  Wl,  4H. 
DivuRun,  II. 

I>»lwc11.M)0. 
Ihilelna,  g41 
Ih>Illii|[<r,  It, 


of  tttluv  l»ii;  <>t  I'lpln,  liS. 

Ihiiuiililnilh,  4i(L 

IMrt.  Sril'-I  lif,  4151, 441,  at. 

IVkIUicm^VT. 

liul.Hs  ('uiIImI,  6\i;  Mlvlnn- 
IliichiiUnl,  CM 


Ilulch  Krtatmei  C] 


trk.8li.». 
En*    u  n, 


F.M.ni.  :w.  BS,  s;2s.     . 
Klaiilhrru*,  «W, 
Mfv  i>r  CoKona,  iM 


ElkeuJtH.  S.\  GOa. 


RmbliMna,  Hmcrid.  ti,  StI. 
Kiili-lro,  m.  ITi.  21ft  088:  Ko- 


KnfliuUn,  tdO. 
l!nEi>Lb>T<1C  0, 
KDKlind.  167a.,  VOi,  MS,  411ift, 

EnllflittDiiient,  Age  o(  eSTiL 


Epivuialkni  In  i.'.  S,.  ROi. 
EpiKcip!  In  ['Hllbu  Inndclluo 

E|ilaGopiUfl.  410. 
Ei't-copln  UnWoTOili^  141. 
£niiiniu.  S»K,  Silt,  Hi,  SIM. 
EiuUinis  413. 
EnlaitiiHlotL  eoO. 
Eilc.  SL,  ao. 

Ern^  Uio  1'U.ui.  4S1. 


'irllx  of  Urecl,  ISO:  of  VikiK 

SaO;  IL.lih;  V.,S30. 
'Miflon,  SIS,  6SH 
■VrJtuiBil  I„  804,411,  4SS;  IL. 

in:  VII.,  ON;  Ibe  CUboUs, 

sm. 

■\-imr.lU»-.lTl-,M.iii»reby,18i. 


lM<i'fsnlil>inv.49». 
lUn  uf  Ciii:urcii,  01. 

DUi.  T,  4a«,  UTn., 

FI^IIuU,  81S. 

FUvluiu  Itl. 

Ftccbltr,  ftlO. 

Fklcba,  HM. 

Fknry,  A.  IL,  HIS:  Cluda,  & 

Fh-rCDce,  Hvpud  uC  ft«i.  SU. 

FuiiuIih'Umii  Cimciirdit,  SSi. 

F.miovmiil,  (Inkr  of,  «& 

rucilt,Ke>llral<>i;il& 


FiiUor.  I 


Foriuii.lin,  OU. 
Fox,  C  J..U9:  Gei 
Fruco.  Pnlctlwit. 
«»I>,c«iniLStr. 
FwneU,   Or.,  MJ; 


"PranclLii,  A.  r 


trUrl      I.IM 


Pramni  u.     OS. 


Ftt,  EltuboUi,  sot 

rirth,  «l. 

FuV.  i<t  NoulllJ,  MI. 

FnUli^  1*0. 

FultEcitiiii  Fi'mndui,  13<. 

a*l>r  uf 'kiiKmbcTK,  300. 


Suinnvlli,  S'.iSa. 
Outn  t>yn«1.  TOS. 
Qupirin,  6<>S. 


Otilert,  Ml. 

OfDcnJ  »fnaAi,  lU.  MO;  On. 

!;''iiii''i"'''iw'''""''''^ 

(il;..-j.-,.r  Shout,  87;*,  ML 

Ueibiu-.l  4lii.  Mt:  Groat,  SIB; 

evniTllI.  MI. 
etKu.Uilbalidim,  OH:  Church. 

IWn.  IBBb ;  OrdnoT  KnlRliU, 

MI,  B9te,  Mi;  TbBaiofT,tii; 

BrCirmed  Cliarch.  SOt. 
«inn>n[D  Chnrrli.  ItOM.  <1S& 
eww^.  ine,  3T7,  BUb  IMi 
Grvliw.  Pleinu.  31. 
OeyH  uf  Floii|;iirT.  ISO, 

Olillvlllw  tot;  Ilnoliul,  S4(i. 


OIIW  iif  Qnro,  4(1,  sa 


Qut>rt.4S& 

Gori.  Fnes.lg  oC 


Gocucliill:.  esa :   trlBM  tf  this 

WonilmMS, 
enmrnam.  Order  oC^^- 

OntUniu,  EuiimtH',  laS*.,lSJ; 

Gnrmuiina  of  lh>  Oerm.  NlUim, 

8K.a;4. 
OnjF  Lf«4nit.  837,  tTS.  4». 
Or-tBrtudu,  llfRirmwlumMIW. 


fnl.nil,  W7.  C,l(^ 


3miniT  iba  Ofhu  141,  14B^. 
1«^IV..1M:T.,1S»;?I.,1»0; 

VI L.  1  a.  If  la,  iNK,ni,  ns. 

Stt;  Vm.,  IW,  ImTIX^  M6 : 

lli;    Xni..  Mi  Ult.;    XV.. 


IIko  Ihe  Good.  SI 


llutrUn.  Emn,  4&  Ml  I.,  1T4, 
1»;  II_  l(..^;  IV..lul,  »S, 
aJ8s.;  Vl.,!!?*!,*^ 

Iliwne,  SocktM  U,  DSD ;  Brnod, 


ti.  iU,  M»9.,  tlOi..  OM. 


lUnlil  [iurfb«er,  3M;  oT  Jni- 
Ilumonliu,  Ua 

iisDpe,  ur.' 
lUfdn,  cry 

Hurt  of  Jung,  Ciei. 

17S,  217;   Greek' Kumu.  ii 
M. 
Iltber.  BeginiaiL  610. 


ei.&Tt. 


lUlTttU  BcfMnk,  aSI,  3W. 


llMnmlw.  3ST. 
Ilenntrnbog.  KBi^  S70 


ieniy  L  nlOernniiiT.  l*" ;  III, 
IWi;  IV.,  IM,  iw.  i»S;  1" 
!»:  V1,«16;  VU,  «tl:  L 
of  EBEbmrl,   1»a:    II     nn; 

viu  far;  VIII.  gjf.  «|: 

IILoTPiun.  4n;   IV..4*S 

4«l:efnniMwlrk.8W;  Lton. 
»»;  U»iik,  tU;  of  WiJiMt, 


llc^rwltur,  M». 
Itelwr.  4SJ 
Illekh  Kllu.  SOS,  «0g. 
niencu.  7ili 
HIrrarchy,  SO,  iU.  K, 


III,  ISl;   IL.  IW;  III. 


INDEX. 


716 


Ha^  Oapet,  189;  de  Parens, 
282;  Grotlus,  415;  of  Pror- 
ence,  188;  of  St  Victor,  24a 

nusuenota,  427,  494s. 

IIuinsnlHin,  554. 

Huiimni^U.  8*27,  823,  417. 

lliimo.  5(>0. 

Kumlllate^  281. 

]Iiins.ary,  250,  417,  479,  498,  548, 

Hurter,  205,  481 

]Iui»a,  34it». 

Hussites,  849s. 

HutU^n,  Ulrich  vod,  839,  867. 

Iliitt^r,  418. 

IlypHtla,  106. 

HypsUtarianss  107. 

IIyata9i>e8,  97,  69a 

I 

Ibas  127, 128, 180. 

IcM-land,  247,  420. 

loonoolasm,  1568.,  178. 

Ulaii,  850. 

Ignatias,  45,  59,  72,  692;  Patri- 
arch, 25S;  (le  Loyola,  4528. 

Icnorantlns,  521. 

Ilanz,  Diap.  of;  887. 

Illuminates,  527,  586w 

Illyria,  142, 148. 

lln:^;e^  156, 178;  Tumult  aboat, 
l.-^fisu,  US. 

Imitative  Arts  of  the  M.  A.,  802 ; 
Protestant,  444s. ;  Later  Catb., 
464.x.  ;  mo8t  recent,  674s. 

Imp<>!«tor^  Three,  267. 

Id  Coena  Domini  Bull,  311,  453, 

am 

Incorruptibility  of  ChrlsVs  Body, 

129,  130. 
In(ie[H'ndent%  423s.,  425<«.,  611. 
Indrx  Probibitorum,  461. 
lodulgcnces,  222s.,  801,  812,  851, 

sm. 

Infallibility  of  the  Church,  147, 

ft44 ;  of  the  Po(>e,  212,  2sa 
Infant  BaptiMn,  70,  152,  224,  431. 
Inirebursre,  24)7. 
Innod'htliis  I.,  121,124,148;  II., 

2IMI ;  III.,  205m..  280,  281,  255 ; 

I  v.,  2«;7 ;  VL,  274 ;  VII  I.,  282, 

810;  X..  511;  XL,  512s.,  618; 

X 11.,  518;  XIII.,  61& 
InqiiiHition,  298m.,  414,  429,  460, 

629. 
Interdict,  228,  811. 
Interim,  896^,  405;  Loljieic  897. 
Inve.Mlture  Coutrov.,  198,  199. 
Ireland,  167,  422,  649. 
I^ena«u^  )>8,  286,  699a. 
Irene,  157. 
Irminsul.  168w 
Irnerius,  216. 
Iroquois  M4. 
Irvin»r,  ftft-vi. 
Kitulla  of  Spain,  68L 
If»enl>lehl,  527. 
Isidortisof  Pcln^nm,  182;  Ilis- 

\iA\\^  184,  186,  178;   Psoado, 

1<4:  On.rttlc,  695l 
Mam.  110.163,8851 
Irariiis,  158. 
I  tab.  111. 
Italy.  178s.,  211s.,  287,  585. 617.V 

62  H. ;  ProteAUntisin  in,  429di, 

609. 
Ivan  RaAilowitz,  4SL 
Ivoof  Cbartroa,  210. 

J 
Jacob  Baradal,  181 
Jaeobi.  548.  6888. 
Jacobins,  296. 
JaoobltM,  18U,  86L 


Jaenlcke,  618. 

Jagello,  887. 

Jamblichus,  4Sb 

James  the  Just,  25,  178;  of  Bs- 
den,  476;  L  of  England,  425; 
II..  498 ;  do  Voragine,  807. 

Jansenism,  516. 

Janssen,  509. 

Japan,  478. 

Javohey,  Abbess,  678. 

Jean  PeUt.  884. 

Jena,  405.  540.  548. 

Jeremias  II.,  Patriarch,  480. 

Jerome,  120, 124, 159 ;  of  Prague, 
848dL 

Jerusalem,  Bishopric,  676 ;  Con- 
quest of;  87, 197 ;  Patriarch  of; 
141. 

Jesnates,  817. 

Jesuits,  45298.,  6248.,  617s.,  625, 
640s. 

Jesus  Christ,  24. 

Jewisli  Christians,  26,  81,  74 

Jews,  90si,  86s.  42&,  885s. 

Joachim  of  Flores,  298& ;  of  Bran- 
denburg, 892. 

Joanna  Papiasa,  166;  of  Naples, 
275 

Joaaaph  IL,  Patriarch,  480. 

Jobannic  Christian%  77. 

John  of  Antioch,  126;  Apostle, 
83.  84;  BaptUt,  154;  Festival 
of;  154;  the  Constant,  875; 
Fa.ner,  185,  142 ;  of  England, 
2<^;  Damascenus,  184;  of  Je- 
rusalem. 124 ;  Prester,  887 :  of 
Lsitki,  407 ;  Matha,  280 ;  of  No- 
punmk,  477;  of  Balisbury, 
241 ;  of  Viccnza,  800 ;  of  Philo- 
ponus,  188;  t^obsticus,  56, 
185;  Eonaras,  260;  Bisismund 
of  Brandenburg,  418 ;  r'rederio 
ttie  Magnanimous,  891,  897; 
VI.,  484 ;  IIL  of  Sweden.  418 ; 
Knights  of  Bt,  282,  819,  662a. ; 
VIIL,  Popo,  186,  269;  X,, 
183;  XL,  188;  XIL,  188s.; 
XXL,  186;  XXIL,  278,  299; 
XXI I L,  278,  889. 

Jonas  of  Orleans,  288. 

Joris,  484. 

Jomandes,  161. 

Joieph  II.,  527, 648,  676. 

Jovinianus,  159. 

Jubilee  Indulgences,  628;  Year, 
8018.,  619. 

Julia  Mammaca,  46. 

Julianists,  129. 

Julisnus  Apostata,  104b.  ;  Cardi- 
nal, 279,  845;  of  Eclanum, 
124;  Minorite,  619. 

Julius  IL.  2S88.,  804,  885;  IIL, 
451,  455;  Afk-icanus,  95,  7uO; 
Bovenis,  42. 

Jumpers.  546. 

Jung  Btilling,  542. 

Juriwllction  Eocles.,  18S&,  215, 
467. 

Jus  Bpollae,  Regallse.  Stolae,  216i 

JustlAcaUon,  882,  467. 

Justinianus  1 ,  106, 129, 189. 

Justinus  I.,  123;  IL,  180 ;  Mar- 
tyr, 48,  509.,  71,  692. 

Justus  Jonas,  8S0. 


Kant,  54a 

Katerlcamp,  12. 

Kaulbach,  674. 

Keller  in  Lucerne,  646 :  Bishop, 

640. 
Kelln«r,670. 
Keplw,  411. 


Kerz,12. 

Kettler,  Conrad,  420. 
Kiow,  257,  481. 

Knishts,  Orders  of;  281s.,  818, 
481 ;  of  St  John,  282,  813, 481. 
Knox,  424. 
Knutzen,  501. 
Koenig,  485. 
Kodde,  482. 
Kohler,  509. 
Kooriand.  420. 
Koran,  109,  110. 
Komthal,  Cong,  of,  557s. 
Krudencr,  Mad.  de,  595,  681. 
Krunimacher  of  Bremen,  564. 
Kublmann,  508. 
Kurtz,  594, 684. 
Kuttcnberg,  Diet  of;  850. 


Labailie,  608. 

Labarum,  108. 

Lachmann,  592. 

Laoordatre,  626L 

Lactantiua,  96. 

Ladenborg.  58a 

Lady  Days.  164. 

Laesare,  547. 

Lainez,45a 

Laity,  57, 140&,  4408L 

Lalande.  52a 

Lama,  887. 

Lamartine,  624a. 

Lambert  of  AschafTenbnrg;  188; 

of  Avignon,  882 ;  of  Bpoleto^ 

187. 
Lamennals,  625,  626. 
Lantyanck,  287. 
Lango,  10. 
Langlon,  203. 
Laplaoo,  490. 
Lapland.  887.  510. 
LapsI,  659.,  67,  90. 
La8Casa^883. 
Lateran  8yn<Hl,182. 193, 199;  I L, 

200,  2U8,  288,  234-285. 
Latltudinarian^  491. 
Laud,  42a 

Laurentias  61 ;  Valla,  827,  88L 
LauMnne  IMsp.,  400. 
La  Valette,  525. 
Lavater,  542. 

Law  and  Oatpel,  408,  409. 
Lay  Brethren,  225a. 
Lazarists,  468. 
League,  Holy,  42a 
Lee,  Anna,  54a 
legacies,  140. 
Legate,  Nuncio,  2ia  52a 
Legend,  GoUlcn,  807. 
Legends,  4. 

Legio  Fulminatrix,  45. 
Lc'gnano,  Battle  of;  2oa 
Lehnin,  Hermann,  57a 
Leibnitz,  4s9!(..  49a 
Leigh  u>un,  49S. 
Leiiksic   Ar»ost.    Symbol,  5608.; 

DUp.,  862^  562 ;  Synod,  «5S. 
Lent,  IM. 
Leo  I.,  Emperor.  128 ;  I.<<auricu% 

156;   Juda,  886;    tlie  Great, 

123,148;    IIL,  174;  IV.,  1>6; 

VIIL,    189;    IX.,    191;    X., 

2d5(t.,  812,  864.  869,  450;  XIL, 

619. 
Leopold  of  Tuscany,  6288. 
Less,  467. 
Lessing,  641,  674. 
LIbanius,  loa 
LibellaticI,  5a 
Liberal  CatboUos,  eSA,  &%& 
LiberinA,14a 
UbOTtinet,40L 


716 


INDEX. 


Lic1nla^  55, 103. 

LiffhN  Frien<ls  of,  579,  581. 

Lleuori,  521. 

Llndborc.  562. 

Lin«lner,  684. 

Llndsey,  611. 

Llppc','56f». 

LUfmture,  Revival  of,  826a. 

Lithuania,  887«. 

Llturpy,  224. 

Livonia,  250,  420,  668. 

Locberor.  12. 

I..ocke,  4S9. 

L<ip«,  22.  84,  94,  98,  112. 

lA>ke,  KUa. 

Ixiliards,  31 S. 

Lomba^lu^  Peter.  289. 

Lontrobards,  166,  178. 

Lord's  Sunpor,  70,  158,  224s.; 
Bull  of.  811,458,62a 

Loretto,  Holy  IIoum.  809s. 

Lorecit,  Annalt)  of,  161. 

Lothair«  I L,  187,200. 

Louis  tho  Bavarian,  278 ;  of  Ba- 
varia, 658,  674;  the  Qennan, 
187;  the  Plons,  184;  Saint, 
8698.;  of  Anjou,  275;  VII., 
Wl;  XII.,  2S4;  XIV.,  494, 
612,518,  514,518;  XV.,  518; 
XVI.,  435;  XVIII.,624;  Phi- 
lippe, 626 ;  Napoleon,  608, 629. 

Louvain,  633. 

Love-Feast,  41,  70, 158. 

Lnceme,  834,  647. 

Lbcke,  60a 

Luitprand,  182. 

Lullua,  169,  834 

Lunevllle,  Peace  of;  688,  686c 

Lather,  861a.,  877sw,  894s.,  899s., 
440,446. 

Lutherans,  861  ss.,  8908..  569,  601 

Latheranlsm,  4028a.,  569a& 

Lynd hurst,  Lord,  650. 

Lyons,  Soc  of  Faith  at  668; 
Synod  at,  12^  267,  856. 

Ljra,  Nic.  de,  831. 

M 

Mabillon,  515. 

Macaria^  707. 

Machiavelli,  828. 

Macedonians,  115. 

Macrena  Mieslawski,  668. 

Madagascar,  616a. 

Ma<liai,  6o9. 

Mafrdeburg,  565. 

Maf^ic,  4S,  309. 

Magna  (iharta,  208. 

Malnibourg.  860. 

Maiinoni<le5,  385. 

Mainottoa.  107,  256&,  866^ 

Major,  405s. 

MaJorln^^  157. 

Maistre,  De,  625. 

Malachius,  200. 

Mand«!vlll<-,  499. 

Manft-cd  of  Sicily,  267s. 

ManicffiiotAiii,  $6«.,  123 ;  of  Mid- 
dle Ages,  2528. 

Mannel,  3^6. 

Marburg  Colloquy,  893;  Free 
Congg.,  581. 

Marca,  Petrus  de,  515. 

Marcellinus,  61. 

Marccllu^ll4.705;  IL,  451, 466. 

Marcionus,  127. 

Marcion,  71,  81s. 

Marcus,  696 :  Aureliiu^  46. 

Marffarctta  Peter,  559. 

Marhelneke,  10,  360. 

Mary,  Worship  of,  152,  219,  221, 
224,  3(»7,  521 ;  the  Catholic, 
422 ;  Stuart,  424. 


Maria  of  Portugal,  681;  The- 
resa, 526. 

Marriage,  68,  708.,  138,  176.  226. 
706;  Doable,  4898.;  Mixed, 
6368. 

Mariana,  458. 

Marienburg.  887. 

Maronitea,  182,  260, 482. 

Marozla,  ISa 

.Marquesas  Islanda,  615. 

Marsilius  Ficlnna,  886. 

Martin  of  Toan*,  151,  177;  I., 
182;  IV.,  270;  V.,  278aw 

Martyrs,  55s.,  69,  154. 

Ma.M>ra,  831. 

Mam,  146,  800. 

Maasalians,  107, 168. 

MasalUon.  516. 

Master  Song,  815,  446. 

Matilda,  CounteeB,  194^  196, 198. 

Matteo  de  Ba.'vt,  462a. 

Matthew,  Father,  650. 

Matthew  Paris,  264. 

Matthias,  Emnieror,  418,  477. 

Matthiesen,  431. 

Maalbroan,  Diap.  at,  418. 

Maur.  Monks  of  St,  462,  481. 

Maurice  of  He»e,  413  ;  of  Sax- 
ony, 893,  895&,  896,  897;  of 
Orange,  4158. 

Mauritius,  688. 

Maury,  580,  686. 

Mauvillon,  687. 

Maximilian  I.,  870;  II.,  417;  of 
Bavaria,  477. 

Maximinus,  65;  tho  Thracian, 
46. 

Maximua,  158. 

Mayence.  169,  280. 

Mayer,  Cbanct-llor,  846. 

Maynooth,  651. 

Mazzlnl,  622. 

Mechatharista,  666. 

Mecklenburg  Catholic  648. 

Mediolanutn,  Synod  of,  114. 

Meinbard,  250. 

Melancthon,  866e.,  873,  873,  888, 
391,  893,  404&,  4398..  446a. 

Melchizedekians,  99,  702. 

Melchites,  181. 

Meletiua,  690. 

Melito,  51,  71. 

Menander,  27. 

Mendaeans,  77 

Mendelssohn,  Felix.  Moses,  676. 

Mendicant  Orders,  2958. 

Mennas,  180. 

Mennonltes,  432,  610. 

Menzel,  360  (Errata). 

Mercy,  Brethren  and  Sisters  of, 
463,  662. 

\fcrle  dWubignS,  861. 

Merlin,  810. 

Mej«ias  Klopstock>,  641. 

Metho<lists,  505,  595,  604. 

Methoiliua,  95,  248, 256. 

Metropolitans,  608. 

Michael,  177;  Cerularios,  869; 
Palaeologus,  269,  854,  855:  of 
Cesena,  299 ;  Angelo,  804, 806. 

Michaelis,  68a 

Mlchelet,  62& 

Miguel,  Dom,  681. 

Milner,  10. 

Miltitz  and  Luther,  866 

Milton,  498. 

Minimi,  817. 

Minlsterium,  68. 

Minnesingers,  244. 

Minorites,  29788.,  818. 

Minucius,  Felix,  49,  61. 

Mlrabcau,  631. 

Miserere,  469k 


Missa,  188. 146;  MarcaUl,  466. 
MlKiona,  Inner,  591 ;   Catholic, 

6688. ;  Priests  of  the.  468,  625. 
Missionary  Socletleo.  6l2as. 
Mo«hler,  14,  655. 
M(^las.  4S1. 

Mohammed,  lOtea. ;  IL.8661 
Molay,  819. 
Molina,  467. 
Mollnoa,  520. 
Momiers,  595. 
MonarchU  Sidliae,  196l 
Monarchlans,  9S&,  196,  704. 
Monasticism,  149, 150,  225. 
MonasUc   Life,    149,    150,   816, 

4628.,  481. 
Mongols,  887s. 
Monod,   Fred.,   608;    Adolphe, 

609. 
Monophysltes,  128,  180b. 
Monothelites,  181. 
Moptalerabert,  628. 
Montanism,  66flL,  89s.,  701. 
Monte  C^ssino,  161. 
Montesquieu,  623l 
Monteequloa.  680. 
Montloeier,  624. 
Moral  Science,  1478.,  888L 
Moralltiec^  802. 
Moravia,  248. 

Moravian  Brethren,  860,  606. 
Morgan,  600. 
Mormons,  612. 
Morrison,  616. 
Mosheim,  9. 
Mozarab««,  16$. 
Mozart,  675. 
Muckers,  6598i 
Mtthlbere,  Battle  oi;  396. 
Mailer,  Daniel,  508;  Henry.  449. 
M&nster,  AnatMiptists  ot,  481&. 
MQnzer,  Thomas,  878. 
Muri,  647. 
Murillo,  461 
Mu5a,168. 

Music  Eccles.,  168,  465,  67& 
Myconina,  860. 
Mysticism.  2898.,  82888.,  S41 619, 

5558.,  661. 

N 

Nttbe,  10. 

Nantes,  Edict  ot,  428,  491 

Naples,  529. 

Napoleon.  682,  688,  648,  676. 

Nassau,  413. 

Natalia,  Alexander,  8. 

NaUlia,  68. 

Naturali'«m,  498aa. 

National  Cliurches,  892. 

Nauniburg  Bishopric,  892 ;  Prin- 
ces' Diet  at,  44>1 

Nazarean^  25,  71 

Nazoracans.  71 

Neander.  History,  10, 68S|  Bish- 
op, 568. 

Neri,  Philip,  4«2. 

Nero,  87. 

Nerva,  8a 

Nestoriana,  1268..  88.S  665. 

Nestorius,  124.  888,  706. 

Netherlands,  Kefi>rm,  414;  Re- 
cent Sut«  of.  696a. 

Neuberg.  Count  Palatine,  476. 

New  Israelites,  647. 

New  Jemaaleni,  6u6sa.,  606. 

Newman,  5998w 

New  Platonism,  478». 

New  Testament,  71,  698. 

New  Year's  Day,  161 

Niebelungen.  L«y  of;  848. 

Ni<»f*,  Svnod  oi;  L,  lltei;  IL, 

157,  na 


u  CallliL.  TuS. 
^^  1 W. 

>'(:1iHi'r";i-iVi5.8M; 
,3tS;  DTint' Fill,', SOS; 
>.  881 :  Uothoi.c,  Wi ; 


IVscTTinDMnmt.tWa. 
'nerli^  41T,  010,  Uaa^ 


Sureal-i^te,  Diet  oC  3I8&.SK: 

Nuncios,  11^  US. 

O 
Oak.  Syno.1  of  ^ll^  lal, 
ObeiMn.  MS. 

ObMiir*  Man,  Lelttn  of,  829. 
Ou'wn.  »l. 

O'CwiwII.  «w.  «sa 
O.k'nw.  IHetor,*]*. 

Chlllo,  n«. 

^EculunpiHlla'.SSd,  S%t. 


loirnlcil  C 


Connelli,  M;  rc 


Hndila,  F.rdsconl,  !«. 
MMiliii'<i'[beYli«lD,M 


UihsUHii,  til). 
Onrkcn.  MbM<iii*iy,«l<)L 
nMtirt.  VI.  tun. 
Olmnsr.l'l-noIoCinL 


rlneon.  lea:  I..  18>,  !tf;  111, 

IK»;  IV.  tOII,tlL 
Lwbnt,  ni. 


pSntLnib  B».  UHb^  MS,  Ml 

■■•iiunu.  896. 

piIilLnUc,  8K;  of  Binrl*,  iK,     I 


rdcHiInt,  «g. 


I'lnltaMD.  IM.  M4, 
t'BMcr,  81<i,   14ta,  1S8> 
!t9w.,«S3&,4fi(IL,MlH, 


_.  .■leUiH,AEa,HI. 
PblILp    L  tt  Friince,  IM.  I 

l>s;  Aninwtiu,  10t,»n; 

Fa1r,?TI.8l9i:  orHtncf 

»>s,s»a.s>i,aH,B>s;  ofa 


rhillpplela.  <0*. 

I'miljipupolLi,   !tt;    Sjiiad  ot 

"bHcJ''ilf     °  "■ 

jiiioiwDUh  isa 

hllodlorslim  IM,  TOS. 


run^  Lelter,  S9S. 

Kii.  on. 

icbsl  ConlroT.,  88, 1M,  Ml. 

!cbi>l\Kl]..  ISIU. 

Kbulua  liKJtwnnm  124,  ISfc 

uau.  TrtMT  oC  898. 

•lortiW. 

tiTinl.JSt. 

IrlHTclift,  Ul ;  oT  CoDBtuUno-    . 


I'dilImi  Aii.-!lt,irt.,Blii,40:  I 
iirratied,  LS8;  UvnTd,  4M«. , 
orSunrBoli,  100:  DfT1lehc^    1 
64l;   Ihe^lmpli,   ISH;   II..    ' 
«SK;  U1.,SM,  3K,  IM,  409. 
4041   IV.,   401.  4N:    v..  40- 
441;  Wirnnftld,  Kl,  1T9; 
UdldolbtiJ.  Mt 
FtolleJiuu,  I0»>.  ML 
Pucu,   ETtrlutlng.   MIn.; 
Qua._«J8.  m;  of  Lint  4H 


IBT,   4«l;    Oilbodoi, 


«!•.*»  a- 


■<Dnhm.4I.  m,  839. 
IT^  Surrril,  303. 
win*.  H,  Ml. 


ii.  ta.  aa.  4h,  «si 


Pwllnttiili,  tMv 
PfBa.  William.  ODi. 

rcniMAR,  M.  ta. 

PrpniUnl.  M. 
I'cnUrim  KIT. 
remjrin".  WM. 


;  gf  l)niy*,»»;ofCMWl- 


718 


INDEX. 


Pothlntu,  697,  699. 

PouasiD,  464. 

Prague  Bishopric,  249 ;  Univer- 
sity. 326,  84ri. 

Pra^rmatic  Sanction,  208,  281, 
284,  2n\ 

Praxea^  99.  704. 

Preaching  Friara.  296. 

Pre<iestinariana,  125,  285. 

Predestination,  122, 225, 879, 401. 

PretnonstrantA,  229. 

PresbyttresMss  89,  707. 

Presbyteries  in  Bavaria,  5728. 

PresbyU•rian^  42«,  498,  597,  604. 

Prwbytens  39,  58,  140. 

Presentla  Passiva,  687. 

Presier  John,  887. 

Prieria^s  868. 

Priesthood,  57, 186, 187, 188, 448& 

Priestley,  611. 

Primastiis  of  Adrymetam,  188. 

Priiicilllanaa,  15a 

ProbabiliMn,  884,  454,  517. 

Proclns,48. 

ProcopluB.  188,  161,  850;  Ga- 
zaeus,  188. 

ProflDSsio  Fidel  tridentina,  466. 

ProIi,558. 

Propaganda,  470. 

Prophecy,  Messianic,  20r. 

Prophets,  88;  Little,  495. 

Pro6elyte^  28,  672. 

ProBolyUHin,  470,  672. 

ProtCJitant  Friends,  578. 

Protestation  of  Speyer,  881. 

Protestantism,  487s.;  Develop- 
ment of;  MSss.;  and  Catho- 
licism, 46Sn,,  67198. 

Protesting   Parties,  159,  251b8., 

Provincial  Syno<ls,  60,  2908.,  531. 

Prudentlua.  116,  7iiO. 

Pmssla,  886,  875,  566a&,  5768flL, 

685«.,  686&,  642. 
Piseudo-Isidorus,  184. 
PtoIemai^  269. 

Ptoleniaons,  696 ;  of  Lncca,  265. 
Priblic    Worship,    1588.,    1778., 

2282SH.,  3U0si^,  444sa. 
Pnlchtria,  127. 
PurKatorj',  146. 
Parilans  362,  864,  422,  601. 
Pu^yism,  599a. 


Qaadraf^esima,  6-S. 
Qaailratus,  Apologist,  50. 
Qaake^^  502,  605. 
Qau'todecimani,  154. 
Qaelen,  626. 
Qaenstedt,  485. 
Qaesnel,  518. 
Quietism,  5198^ 
Quinot,  62S. 
Quinit«exta,  134. 

S 

Rabanns  Maanl^  288,  284. 

Rabbi  Akiba,  42. 

Kabblnisin,  428. 

Kadbod.  King  of  Friaona,  168w 

Uadicali^m,  563,  647s. 

Katnmohun  Roy,  615a. 

Ranke,  8608. 

Raphael,  806. 

Rapp,553. 

RHtheriu^  236. 

Rationalism,    600b.,   5078.,   544, 

5508. 
Ratisbon,  Alliance  of;  876;  Diet, 

898,  412,  477. 
Ratralnnu^  234,  286. 
Raamer,  588. 


Ravalllao,  429L 

Hawicz,  658. 

Raymond  of  Bezieres,  256;  de 

Pennaforte,  286;  de  Babnnde, 

825:  du  Pay,  282;  of  Thou- 

loiL«c  256. 
Raynal.  523. 
Haynaldu^  S. 
Ke.•^der^  547. 
ReaIi!«t^  239,  3218. 
Kecognitions  of  Clement,  692,708. 
lU'demptorist.*.  521. 
Uedt^ciner,  Order  of  the^  817. 
Reformation   in   Cath.  Cliarch, 

276«.,  33.S.  848;    Forerunners 

of  the,  351;   Protestant,  860; 

IntroducUon  of;  886l 
Reformed  Church,  884a,  8998., 

5958.;    Presbyterian   Charch, 

6(4. 
Rogalla,  216,  287. 
Kegcnbrocht,  659. 
Regino  of  Pruem,  210. 
Rehm,  10. 

Keichlin-Meldegg,  12. 
Reimams,  587. 
Relnhard,  54& 
Itoynardua,  2488.,  816. 
Religion,  Prussian  Edict  of;  540. 
Religious   Peace   of  Augsburg^ 

89S8. ;  of  Nuremberg,  881 
Keligioel,  225. 
Rcliquca,  151«.,  220. 
Remigius,  166,  285. 
Remonstrants,  415. 
Kcpi>al  Meetings.  650^ 
Reservatum  Eocledastieiiin,  899. 
Reservation,  2SS. 
Restitution,  Edict  ot,  479. 
RetractAtion^  128^. 
Kcuchlln,  329. 
Reversales,  607. 
Revivals  in  America,  601. 
Revolution,  Engl.,  497a. ;  French, 

I.,  5>»s8. ;  II.,  e258^ 
Reynard  the  Fox,  815. 
Rhenish  Bavaria,  568,  572& 
Ithenius,  613. 
RhonsM*,  Electoral   Alliance   at 

274,  2S7. 
Rlcci,  Jesuit,  474et 
Richard  C<Bor  de  Lion,  204s.; 

Simon,  516 ;  of  St  Victor,  24a 
Richelieu,  428. 
Richer,  460. 
Rienzo,  Cola  de,  274a. 
Riga,  251,  420. 
Robber  Synod,  128, 144 
Robert  Guiscani,  192,  196;   of 

Arbris5el,    228;    of   Citeanx, 

22$;  Stephens,  465. 
Robeepierre,  581. 
Robinson,  423. 
RiKlriguc^  Olinde,  679. 
R'dir.  545,  561. 
Riinnow  of  Riiskilde,  419. 
Kogor  of  Sicilv,  196,  200. 
Rohrbacher,  65«. 
Roman  Catholics  in  the  XT.  S., 

602. 
Rome,  Pagan,  Hsa.,  488. ;  Bish- 
opric of;  61,  1428.;  Repablic, 

622SS. 
Romantic  School,  556,  674. 
Romualdo,  227. 
Roncolian  Plainfl|  Battle,  202. 
Rongis  656s. 
Ronsilorf;  509. 
Roothaan,  OlS. 
R<*»ary,  8(K). 
Roscellinns,  289. 
Rosen  kranz,  558. 
Rosicrusiana,  449. 


RoBkolniei.  666L 

Rossi.  Count,  622. 

Roswitha,  285a. 

Rothschild,  677. 

Rousseau,  528. 

Koyaard.  II. 

Royko,  11. 

Rubens,  464. 

Rucbat  3C1. 

Rudolph  of  UapsbiiTX,  2608.;  of 

Suabia.195;  II.,  417. 
Rugen.  249. 
Ruffo,  Cardinal.  580i 
Ruflnus,  98, 120. 
Rupert  of  Deutx.  248w 
Rnpp,  580,  584,  589. 
Russell,  Lord,  600,  tfSa 
Russian  Church,  257,  481a,  666u 
Russia,  ProteeCantism  la,  579a^ 

668. 
Ruttenstock,  12. 
Riiyshroek,  82a. 
Ryswick,  Peace  of;  496L 

8 
Sabbatarians,  44T,  610. 
Sabellicos,  26Sl 
8abellin^  lOa 
Saeerdotiom,  68L 
Sacharelli,  8. 

Sacraments,  224a,  860,  889L 
Sacramentarian  Contror., 

287,  88901,  899&,  401. 
Sacriflcati,  56. 
Sacrilege,  Law  on,  626. 
Sadduoeee,  22. 
Sailer,  661. 
Salnt^  Worship  of;  151&,  231; 

8078.,  620. 
St  Oermain,  Peace  o^  427. 
St  <Tohn.  Knights  ot^  882,  819ii: 

Disciples  of,  77. 
St  MarUn,  584. 
St  Maurus,  402, 48L 
St  Simon,  679. 
Saladin,  204 
Sales,  Francis  oC  461. 
Salisbury,  John  «rf;  241. 
Salle,  Baptist  de  la,  621. 
Salvianos,  149. 

Salzburg,  Evangellcala  c^  488L 
Samaritan^  28,  268. 
Samo^ateniani.  100. 
Sami>^iean\  S5. 
Samson,  885. 
Sancho  L,  207ei 
Sandwich  lalanda,  614a 
San  Oraal,  244 
Sardica,  Synod   of;   118fl.,    142, 

707. 
Sarpi,  860,  467. 
Saturninus,  77,  698. 
Saumnr  Academy,  490. 
Savonarola,  852.S. 
Saxony,  169,  685. 
Saxon  Reformation,  868Bl.  492s., 

562,  57SS. 
Scanderbeg,  856. 
Scapular  of  the  Yirstii,  280. 
Schaff,  6S4 
Scheibel  509s. 
Schelling,  550a^  602. 
Schiller,  542. 
Schism,  275. 

Schlciermacher,  11,  690. 
Schmidt  J.  E.  Ch.,  9. 
Schneidem&hl,  66a 
Schoefller,  Abbe,  664 
Schocnherr,  660. 
Scholasticism,  289aL,  820b. 
Scholz,  65i 
Schroeck,  9. 
Scholz,  Court  PrMcfaer,  64a 


ScrlnlDrM.  tH  Hcdj  I 


Bcwtliusili.,  ffiSi.MI. 
SaitiiL  Dmu,  HI  1  Erl»oi,m(. 

t(*L-»»IJI.  M4I. 

BctnlHrlxivs  IlSl. 
BcDilpuliftliv,  li^ 

'Senilrmilr.  Agreement  It,  <M 

fitMtMliU  cif  WuittmbBTB;  MTn 
..r  l-riixK  sent. 

SrnimUiB,  luo. 

fitrdiu     IIL.    19S:    Pitlluiili, 

ill;  Tyebleu, Ml. 
eKriiioio,«>l,  4t5,MQiL 

tiecen  S1«mi^  M. 
tl«Ter1*ni,  lit,  lai. 
benstliiiu,  IW. 
SiiKriB  Aleund«t.  *t- 

f  hnAiatincy.  4ini.  SID. 
Bluken.  t44,  ftHL 

tiu.)iiiiK  l-'wk^  >T,  ras,iu. 

ttldllin    MuDUcby,   SCO,    BU; 
V«-Mrfci7i). 

SIckiDio-D.an.Mt 

8leinIe<Hi.,«M. 

JJterM,  AMI. 

tlUiWn  uf  <lnnbt«(in,  1S2l 

SlEliman.!,  EmiH'ror,  1IT,  SIS: 

111.,  i't  fwclm,  tib,  4WI. 
Slnirtci  UeUphnnu,  iAOL  Sly- 


liliiionv.  181, HI;  oom&SSSi, 
Plnteiifii.  M3. 
flHriiu,  NV,  IM. 
«lnnloin.  ftcnuj  o^  114 

Birtu  IV., W.BU:  V. «*,*«■ 


lr.ir»,SjB«l<<a8»,  S, 


4.  ]««,  11%  1ST.  au,  ^ 


S[«.,  FrdL,  461. 
ap>'r<^r^l>lrl(<»9L 


10. 


HUnilU 

etaruT,.nl.  wt. 
SUiijill.,WS.«*). 

suiDbiiiii.T.  m. 

Bl«pU(n1'.,'Bi ;"  IL.  iSrviL, 
ISI;  Lt-.IM:  Bo*»t»l, «!■. ; 
at  llaniiuy.  UO;  oT  I>7C4deo. 
6M. 

Slockholm,  Soclalf  In,  MS. 

aioltwrv.  11,  ni. 

Btrulwui;,  8;iiad,<Ue;  Ficall)'. 


Bulplclu  Stvmu,  10& 
Bund.v,41,M,IM. 
SnparbittDdKili,  4U{  Oenenl, 

Siiiwrlat  CnnahlorlHi,   FnMti, 


Suirt.8>H«lut  IW. 
Sweiten.  ii.V  HO. 


Ldhtugliuifk,  e 
icrluuLSMa 


iword,  BrMhnn  of  tin.  S31. 
itWuiai  ^o^x•llUnB^  isiit. 
iylvMter  1..  lilt,  \H;  IL,  1 


^>nBR.^  IW.  II 


1^  CulutlluUod,  «0>H  44D1I;, 

;  cautu.  IT},  n2,  tas. 

iL  Holy.  AM.  «T0. 


Tuienil,M)!L 

Tmo.  Turqgito,  tOL 

Tilluius  SI,  SB. 

T»nlM,  KM. 

Tuillan   of  Iho  Chnnh,  140^ 

si«,a»a 

Tampkni  m,  Sl^.  ««,' 
Tanftoriil  SvKlwD,  4M,  DTI. 
TBtluld,  IM. 


hnalora,    KinptcM,    lit;  lET, 


iMotloreliu,  IDl,  i: 

lie«ll41]B  AKlcltf, 


Tbmdwliu  I,  MO,  lllle„  U8; 

ILIM. 
TlwiKlotiu^  n,  TM. 
Thcnliilpb  of  Ortcaiu,  ITD. 
TtionpuBchLlM,  las* 
TbeopbuH,  Cnofe 


ThHinbrlumi,  SCI. 
Theojophjf,  MT» 
eioTiliai,  MS.  1S& 
Thmi-'DtM.  t9. 


Tbomlsla,  »3\k.  S8J,  tfl 


720 


INDKX. 


Trinity,  09.1  la 
Tritt/nlu-lin,  -JiV). 
Tr«>u»>n«l«nr!».  24-1. 
Tnico  of  (J.xl.  2us,  217. 
TnillMii  Svno.l.  VM.  14S,  IM. 
Tubiti;,vn,      InivorfJtv,      32*2; 
Soho.»l,  <M»Ut,  51:»  ;  NVw,  608ft. 
Turkov,  fiTo. 
Tnnis,  2<N<. 

Tutrov,  IJW. 

Tyrannlrido,  33-1,  442«.,  45Srt. 
Tvn.j.  MS,  (Vitl. 
Tachlrner,  9,  WO,  tills. 

T' 
riilich.  ftTSs.,  5S2. 
riplilKiA.  165. 
Ulrlch  of  Aup^b.,  213;  of  WQr- 

tomb.,  Wl. 
lT|t^llllontalllsU^  GA2s. 
Uniformity,  Act  of.  423. 
Uniirenitnls  Itnll  of,  MO. 
Union,  4H.SS.,  .V2(K :  Evang.,  60S^; 

of  tho  Kv.  Clinrch,  .V»6*..,  57S; 

of  the  Cath.  and  O  roek  Charch- 

es,  4^1,  Of'tH. 
Unltariun^  9<^.4..  4389.,  603,  Oil. 
Unlversalla,  'iiVX 
Uuivorsalissts,  6«»5. 
Universities,  2:}69.  :^& 
Upper  Khenish  Prov.,  478,  C48. 
Urban  11.,  19rt,  197;   IV„  801; 

v..  27.". :  V  I.,  275,  802 ;   Vlll., 

4.W,  450,  Mr.. 
Urlsperjii-r,  530. 
Urslnos,  413. 
Unula,  5tf. 
Ursulirif.-*.  463. 
Utraq'iists  AVK,  477a. 
Utroilit  Jan>fuiats,  519;  Union 

of,  415. 


Vaira.<«(>,  523. 

Val»i^  (UT. 

VaUn^,  114. 

Vnleiitininniw  II.,  IIC;  III.,  189, 

141 
Valc'iitiniiit,  Gnoj-tlc,7Ss,  C95. 
VaU'rliiiniH,  4(». 
Vallialliu  I(;L 
VaIl:^  .MJ7.  i.m. 
Valloinl.ros:i.  Or.ler  of,  227. 
ValtfliiKs  47^. 
VaiuLil"*,  h)!>:*. 
VaM,  4IS 
Va-«arl,  3<«. 
Vw^hIs,  171. 

Vaud,  (':»Tit<.n  of,  400,  59S,  611. 
Venein.'i,  11. 
Vergrrias  469. 
Verscboorcn,  509. 


Vcsi»aMnnus  37. 

Vtio  Act.  5'J7. 

Victor  I..  ftN.  W,  704;  IL,  191; 

III.,  196,  2<>2. 
Vienna   ('t^nc<»r«lat,    2S1 :    Cou- 

eri'SN  On.\  617 :  IVaco  of,  417 ; 

Till  i.l.  F.iruliv  at,  60G. 
ViffilaiitltiN  15'.»; 
Vlirilltis,  12l».N 
Viunb,  67. 
Villaiii.  264, 

Vihncnien.  ILittlo  of.  495. 
Vinctnt  «lc  rmila,  4tW. 
Vlncentius  Forreri.  313 ;  of  Beau- 

vala.  264 ;  of  LIrinum,  111. 
VInct,  59S. 
Vlrt^t,  400. 

Vlrjflllua,  Mngieinn,  810. 
Vljober,  W3s. ;  rotor,  804. 
ViRltants  Female,  463. 
Vi>ltatl  .n,  Article*  of,  411 ;  Book 

of,  a-Ji. 
Vitwj.',  SL.  D.incc,  313. 
Vla<IJmlr.  857. 

Vlaillsljins  IV.  of  Poland,  420. 
V<)lco5,  Calline,  in  Sweden,  559. 
Voltaire.  5S8.  54S. 
Vosjs  J.  II.,  672. 
Vulgate,  HI,  466. 

W 
WalaMd  Stnibo,  Un. 
Walden*^*,  254s.,  8425.,  6ia 
Wallacbian^  665. 
Waller,  IIan.\  446 :  of  tbe  Vogel- 

welde,  244;  of  SL  Vlrtor,  ?41, 
Wartbunc,  Lather  at,  372b. 
WeffKcbeider,  Mi,  562. 
Weljrol,  449. 
Weimar  I)l*imt.,  406:    Eccle^ 

Order,  674. 
Welshaupt,  527. 
Wellington,  019. 
Wence»lau%  84Ss.  ai>8. 
Wend^  249. 
Wetkrneister,  654. 
Wertlulm  Ulhlo,  490. 
We*cl,  .lohn  ot,  851>. 
Wesley.  .5<>5.s. 
Wcswl.  351. 
WessenWrg,  6.36.  646. 
Wo.*5<'brunru'r  Pmyer.  223. 
Westi-ru'*,  Diet  of.  41s. 
Wfst  In.lie.s475,  51U. 
Westphal,  407. 
Wt^'tpliulla,  Peace  of,  479. 
Wett.«»t<!ln,  491. 
Whilefiebl.  5''5;«. 
Wichern,  691. 
Wieland,  542. 
WIpand,  40S,  411. 
WMlberforc*',  506. 


W]k1en»i«ch  cniciAzlon.  559. 

Wilhchnina.  Bohe^an,  842. 

William  of  CbaniM'aax.  24^1;  of 
St.  Amour,  29*:  of  MinMiii, 
227 :  of  Occ.im,  321 ;  oft  »ranci-, 
49-? ;  tlio  <'onqueror,  194. 

WiNon,  BI-Jiop.  615. 

Winer.  598. 

Winfrwl.  16S. 

Winkelmann.  672,  674. 

Wisi'man,  65K 
I  Wil*Ilcenu^  579.  5S0. 

Witches.  175 :  TrlaLi  of,  810bl,  491. 

Witiroru^tein,  5<i9s. 

Wltira.  172. 

Wittenbvrg  Univ..  326:  Thesefi, 
868:  Fire  Htnial,  369;  Icono- 
cla<im,  872^ :  Surrender  of, 
396;  Conn.rdium,  «99;  Phll- 
ippbta  of,  40l«^ ;  Lutlif  r&nlam, 
4!>9. 

wizti,  46a 

Wladlmlr,S57. 

Wladi.^Iaus  of  Bohemia,  8M. 

Woellner,  540. 

Wolf,  4S9SI. ;  Pet^r,  11. 

Wolfonbfkttel  Fnure.,  M7. 

Wolfram  of  Ei^cbenbaclt.  244. 

Woltmann,  S6<i. 

Women,  39.  140,  6S0. 

WwLiton,  499. 

Work^  Neccieitv  of.  lii&i..  4^^. 

Worm^  C<»nconiat,  190 ;  Diet  at, 

3719.;  Syiio«l  at,  195. 
Worship,  see  Public  Worship. 
WQrtcmbonr,  391.M7.57iK,6Vt. 
WupjK'rthal  la  Africa.  OlOw 
WycIlfTe,  »46a. 

X 

Xavler,  4.'i2,  472. 
Ximcne^  294,  331. 


Young  Germany,  554. 


Zabians.  77. 

Zueliariajs  Po|i^,  173. 

Zelatorc^  29S. 

Zeno  Ivaiiricnfl.  12S;  Stoic,  17. 

Z«'phvriruis  701,  7l»4,  7o5, 

Zillertliftl,  »i«»6. 

Zinrendorf,  50fln. 

Ziska,  .S.*y). 

Zittel.  572. 

Zunanui,  261. 

Zo^imus,  las,  124. 

Zulpicb,  Battle  o^  166. 

Zurich,  8Ji6,  S.'W. 

Z>«ickau  Pn»phets  3T2s.  4SL 

Zwingle,  3»4aA.  SdS& 


THE   END. 


f»  BO'JHDBY  ^ 


.sr--^ ->^?^?^'^ 


^^ V     .  ;